The URL can be used to link to this page

1989-03-21CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA MARCH 21, 1989 - 7:30PM 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Agenda Adoption. 4. Approval of Minutes of March 7, 1989."� 5. Consent Calendar: - %1" a. Purchase Replacement Pickup b. Final,Plat Approval, Mendota Heights Business Park (Resolution No. 89-24) c. Approval for Abatement - 886 Marie Avenue d. Street Sweeping Bid Award e. Fina Sign Permit f. Val's Addition - Tree Moving-- (Resolution oving—(Resolution No. 89-25) g. Approval of Joint Powers Agreement to Provide Recycling Services - **h. Approval for Purchase of Recycling Containers - i. Acknowledgement of January Treasurer Report j. Approval of List of Contractors k. Approval of Rubbish Hauler Licenses 1. Approval of the List of Claims End of Consent Calendar 6. Introductions - J 7. Public Comments and Requests - 8. Public Hearings and Bid Awards a. Case No. 89-06, CUP for PUD and Preliminary Pla for Mendota Heights Business Center, Third dd. ion (X4),gr, psolution No. 89-26) b. Improvement No. 89, Project #2, Robert Morin Feasibility - Storm Sewer(8n• 5pm) / (Resolutio..,n�i N9T 89717) *c. Improvement No. 87, Project #2'- Ivy Falls Cr Bid Award (Resolution No. 89-28) - 9. Unfinished and New Business *a. Recommendatioof Citizen's Parks Review Commit ee 0U-trip7 0-70.4r • At. b. U. Wes Buil at' n nd Plan c. Val's Addition P a�sand Spec ,-, d. TIF Relocation Rules and Tru k Highway 55 A ea Pr p�rtyquisit' ns — .L e . Po ' ce Oa A o3Cn ei� �°`l p ral- f. ��. Poice t. D1�R Prog a Appr t g. Police Dept. SM tPaa k Fo h. Pur o Po ce D t. Fumi�'fgWipment i. Discussion o ity Attorney Report Concerning I Uses and Restrict' o s of Retail Hours of �h n Oera ption ?',�f^� j. Request for Extension on Old itJe S atio�r R tZ �- / **k. Request from Bloomington a Richfield to Partici ate intudy of MSP Ade ua y "j. 10. Response to CounciComents 11. Council Comments 12. Adjourn 3T AP' ult MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS March 21,E To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevi�Yr4e, City Administrator Re: Add --On Agenda for March 21st Two new items, 5.h. Approval for Purchase of Recycling Containers, and'9.k. Consideration of Request to Partic in Further Airport Study are recommended for addition tc evening's agenda. New information is submitted for two already scheduled. The revised agenda also includes son the usual sections, i.e. Introductions, that were left c the tentative agenda. 3. Agenda Adoption It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda printed on pink paper. 5.h. Approval for Purchase of Recycling Containers Please see attached memo from Administrative Assistant Batchedler. 8.c. Ivy Falls Creek Bid Award Please see attached memo from Public Works Director Jim Danielson. 9.a. Recommendation of Citizen's Parks Review Please see attached memo from City Administrator Kevin Frazell. 9.k. Request from,Bloomington and Richfield to in MSP International Airport Study Although this item was inadvertently left off of the age that was prepared last Friday, Councilmembers did recei` materials in their agenda packets. Attached you will fj additional letter from the Mayor of Richfield. 1989 Lpate this items s of Ef of in e the nd an MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS March 21, To: Mayor and City CQ i�� From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative AssistanC Subject: Purchase of Additional Recycling Containers INTRODUCTION The purpose of this memorandum is to request the au purchase 700 additional recycling containers. DISCUSSION As of today, we have received 1,311 sign-up cards fro who wish to participate in curbside recycling. This i nine percent (49%) response rate and the cards trickling in at about 40 a day. At this rate we will our original 1,500 recycling containers very shortly. overwhelming response rate which is very encouragin future of the recycling program here in Mendota Heights .989 zation to citizens a forty - re still un out of his is an for the It is difficult to predict when the participation 1 vels will stop rising. As Council is aware, our program is designed to include voluntary recyclers first, and then implement incentive programs and marketing approaches in order to build and increase participation. We will need more recycling bins to do this. There are 2,700 households in Mendota Heights. The p rchase of another 700 bins would give us a total of 2,200 bins Dr eighty- one percent (81%) of the households in Mendota He ghts. I believe this should be sufficient to cover our needs, given our storage capabilities. Rehrig-Pacific, our container vendor, has promised to hrld on the original purchase price of $5.01 per container. 700 containers shipping freight $3,507 850 (approx. $4,360 This amount is well within the budget for the 1989 Program funded by Dakota County. ACTION REQUESTED Pass a motion to approve the purchase of 700 Husky -lit containers from Rehrig-Pacific Company for the cost of Recycling recycling 4,360. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 21, 1 TO: Mayor, City Council and Ci � or FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets Ivy Falls Creek Addition Job No. 8704 Improvement No. 87, Project No. 2 DISCUSSION: Bids were received at 10:00 A.M., Monday, March 20th for the project (see attached resolution). The Engineer's Estimate was $1 This project had two deduct alternates: dove 8,000. Deduct 1. Continuing Brookside Lane through to Laura Lane ve sus leaving it to deadend in a cul-de-sac and only serve the Developer's lots (see attached map). The neighbors and the School District involve were not opposed to continuing the project through their property subject tc re- ceiving favorable bids. As you can see from the following table, favorable bids have been received, however because the bids were just opened yesterday all the affected owners have not yet been contacted. We don't eve expect to get a better price than this bid therefore staff feels that the neighbors will want to go ahead with the project at this time. ASSESSMENTS Property Original Adjusted No. of C st Per Owner Estimate Estimate Lots Lot Ivy Falls Creek Add. School District Blum Sullwold Licha Robinson $120,546 $ 63,488 $ 9,126 $ 9,126 $ 18,254 $ 3,513 $113,690 $ 41,990 $ 5,820 $ 5,820 $ 11,640 $ 3,040 10 3 1/2 1/2 1 1 (Exist.Lot) 11,369 13,996 11,640 11,64o 3,040 4;. Z Deduct 2. A Park trail and bridge connecting the neighborhood to Somerset Elementary School. The original estimate for this work was de- veloped by updating the price for a similar bridge that the City installed in Valley Park eleven years ago. We estimated nearly $40,000. Staff made some modifications to the bridge abutments to try and bring the cost of the bridge down this time, because of that and because of the fact tha the contractor gave us an extremely good price the final cost will be out $190000. The Park Commission was not interested in going ahead with the project if the cost was to be $40,000 however when we received such a favorable quote we'talked with John Huber, the trails sub -committee chairman and Jim Stein, Park Commission Chairman and they both felt more fa orable about the proposal. The total project costs came in so favorably, that staff feels that we should proceed with the trail and bridge and ftnd the costs partially by assessments (suggest $500 per lot) and the remainder against the park funid. HRS, the low bidder is a new contractor and'his bid ' was extremely low. Because it was so much lower than the next low bid, he came in and went over the bid with us line item by line item to see if there was an errol. After that review;`informed hinformed us that he still feels his bid is a good one. We also called references on places where he completed work last year, those refer- ences were all very favorable. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that awarded. Deduct Alternate subject to final approval ACTION REQUIRED: the basic contract and the trail deduct be No. 1 (Brookside extended) should be awd I rd from all the affected landowners. If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 89-_, RESOLTUION ACCEPTING AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STORM STREET CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE IVY FALLS CREEK ADDITION AND ADJACENT (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO. 2). (Should the neighbors along I decide that they do not want to go ahead with their portion, staff bring the Resolution back to Council next meeting for reconsiderat' should BIDS AND SEWER AND AREAS will -on. ) 0 City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCT OF SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER AND STREET CONSTRUCTION SERVE IVY FALLS CREEK ADDITION AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO.2) WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the proposed cor struction of sanitary and storm sewer, water and street, curb and gutter improvements to serve Ivy Falls Creek Addition and adjacent areas (which improvements have heretofore been known and designated Improvement No. 87, Project No. 2), bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law and the following bids were received con plying with said advertisement: NAME OF BIDDER AMOUNT OF BID HRS Construction $140,261.80 Forest Lake, MN Brown & Cris, Inc. $181,959.80 Lakeville, MN S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. $195,841.00 Shakopee, MN Ro-So Contracting, Inc. $211,023.00 Centerville, MN Imperial Developers $226,075.13 Bloomington, 141 Ceca Utilities $255,660.25 Burnsville, MN and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has recommended that HRS Construction o Forest Lake, Minnesota, be declared the lowest responsible bidder. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the Ci Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the bids for the project are hereby received and ac- cepted. 2. That HRS Construction of Forest Lake, Minnesota, is here declared to be the lowest responsible bidder. 3. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver any and all contracts and docs ments necessary to consummate the awarding of the bid for the as of above described improvements to HRS Construction of Forest La Minnesota. 4. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, exce that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next loaves bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 21 day of March, 1989• CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. ATTEST: I Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk tensotto, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 21, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin 1, City Administrator SUBJECT: Pote tial Agreement Between the City and Scho District 197 for Henry Sibley Athletic Field Development With the materials sent to you on Friday, you rece memo outlining the parameters for a potential agreement between the City and School District 197 for developmen operation of athletic facilities at the Henry Sibley ca Since that time, Mayor Mertensotto and members of the Citizen's Parks Review Committee have offered thoughtsf amendment. Those changes are included in the revisions below: 1. Facilities needed at the site Two softball fields, one baseball field, one soccer field, playground equipment, one comf station with rest rooms, concessions, and st All fields will have bleachers and player be there will be a backstop, dugout, and goal f included. Lighting of fields will be resery the future. 2. How should the facility be controlled and mana We would be in favor of creating a recreatio board, as allowed by Minnesota Statutes. Th board membership would be comprised of two c council members, two school board members, a three citizens from the community (one representing Mend -Eagan, one representing yo athletics, and one at -large Mendota Heights resident with children enrolled in School District 197). 3. What hours of priority would the City need in facility? ed a and age. hes; cing for ? School District 197 would have priority until 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday during the school year, and until 1:00 p.m. during the summer school activities. All other times would be priority for the City of Mendota Heights. 4. How should the land and facilities be owned? As tenants in common, with each party having percent undivided interest in the land and a] improvements. This roughly parallels the re] contributions of the School District in term: land, and the City in terms of facilities. 5. Who does maintenance and under what terms? x 50 L hive of 2 This issue would not be addressed explicitl in the joint agreement between the City and the School -District. It would rather be left tc the recreation board for study and request of f ndin to the City Council and the School Board. 6. Parking Facilities - How much do we need and ant? Priority for 100 parking spaces at all time during which the City has priority use of the facilities (see number three above). 7. How will disputes between the City and District be resolved? First by the recreation board, second by submittal to an arbitration panel. 8. How are ongoing financial obligations of the wo .parties set? The recreation board (see number two above) be responsible for developing and recommend maintenance budget. School District 197 an City of Mendota Heights would each contribu half of those maintenance costs. If either entity did not agree to pay its share, it w be up to the recreation board to come up wi alternative budget. The recreation board w also be responsible for maintaining a five capital improvements plan for the facility, program for funding those improvements. 9. Consumption of Alcohol Alcohol consumption could be totally banned the site. 10. How long should the agreement last? ld a n an uld ear and a Although the property and improvements are owned as tenants in common by both parties, an agrlement setting up the Recreation Board, and setting forth other details for routine operations will be needed. That agreement would run for an inil period of 25 years, and could be cancelled of upon bilateral agreement by both parties. Al end of 25 years, the agreement would automat: renew for another 25 years, unless cancelled either party. 11. Dissolution of the/agreement. The agreement would provide that if it shoul dissolved, or not renewed at the end of the year period, each party would have the first of refusal to purchase the other party's int with land values set based on single-family zoning. If the parties could not agree on purchase of interests, the matter would be submitted to a court for division of the pro interests. We would also add a provision that use of the stor facilities in the comfort station should be for City us only. ial ly the cally by be 5 right rest, e y 1057 Chippewa Ave. Mendota Heights, MN 55118 3-18-89 Charles Mertensotto, Mayor Mendota Heights City Hall 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mayor Mertensotto: I am writing to you as a member of the Citizens Parks Review Committee. I will not be able to attend the city council,meeting wh( the committee presents Its final report and recommendations. Since January, the committee has spent many hours examining the various options available for needed Improvements In our park and public recreation system. We looked at trails, neighborhood parks and ballfields. We began work without preconceived notions or blases, other than to determine most cost-effective plan that would benefit all residents of Mendota Heights. We arrived at our final plan through a process that lnvolvo an ananlysis of needs and a thorough consideration of all options. I also eliminated costly Ideas. Through consensus, we agreed to a plat that will do much to meet the present and future demands for quality recreational facilities In our community. I urge the council to acco our recommendations. The trail system In our city needs upgrading so that both childrei and adults can walk or ride bikes for exercise or to visit friends; walking and biking are basic forms of transportation, and we need to make better facilities available for them. The Improvement of neighborhood parks and the addition of more and better ball fields 1; urgent need. The council should consider a Joint powers agreement with the District 197 school board. There are critics of such a plan. To the would say that they only need to look at the dozens of communities 11 the state of Minnesota that have very successful Joint powers agreemi that reflect both cooperation and the cost-effective use of what wou otherwise be under-utilized facilities. Critics might also say that land acquistion costs of our plan are high. Keep In mind that the cost of an average city lot In M.H. ran! from $50,000 to $60,000. This Is double what a lot costs In Hastings Also remember that land will not get cheaper if we wait and do nothii I know you and the other members of the council will give this Important matter the careful attention and serious consideration It deserves. Thank you. Yours truly, Wz-e., Mike Kluznik 4 , our the an nts d too .1 9. I P.S. I discovered previously, and th note that a Joint recommendations. District 197, then I would like to c diligent efforts. Blesener and Kevin administrative as cc: Janet Blesener a couple of typographical errors in a letter sent Is represents a corrected version. Also, please powers agreement is not a central part of our If an acceptable agreement cannot be achieved with another alternative should be explored. Finally, ommend all members of the committee for their I would especially like to single out Jann Frazell for the respective leadership and slstance they provided. City of Richfield - 6700 Portland Avenue - Minnesota 554; City Manager Mayor Council James D. Prosser Steve Quam Edwina Garcia ' Ivan Ludeman Martin Kirsch Michael Sand - March 13, 1989 Charles Mertensotto Mendota Heights Mayor 750 South Plaza Drive St. Paul, MN 55120 Dear Ma ansot of Mayor Laughinghouse has asked me to speak for both our communities to thank you for attending the March 6 lunch discussion of airport issues at the Decathlon. This evi your community's interest in this critical concern is si appreciated. n of y To summarize our discussion, the City Councils of Bloomi gton and Richfield are considering a plan to supplement and indep ndently assess information developed in the Metropolitan Council Airport Adequacy Task Force Study and in the Metropolitan Airport Airports Commission ten year plan. Of particular concern is the effort of some groups to pr conclusion that a new airport is desirable before the re of that action has been fairly investigated, and before for a new airport has been clearly established. To date has been no serious effort to quantify the economic cost south and west suburbs, as well as to the major downtown removing this vital economic magnet to a distant site. has there been a real evaluation of costs to the entire providing infrastructure including the highways and transportation necessary to relocate the airport. Finally, the inconsistencies between Metropolitan Counc projections, as to future capacity requirements, and th relatively superficial investigation of MSP potential e alternatives, give rise to serious questions whether a airport will, in fact, be required. Bloomington and Ri have asked your community to consider helping to addres and other concerns enumerated in the Request for Propos we showed you at our meeting. Telephone 869-7521 (612) pel a 1 impact he need there to the of either tate, of and MAC on field these s that March'13, 1989 Page Two The concept of this study has met with positive encouragement from Sen. Schmitz, whose committee is grappling with this issue. It is viewed as an objective attempt to coordinate existing information, and to "fill the holes" in the essential areas the Legislature should consider before encouraging a direction in airport planning that may determine a particular result. At the meeting you attended with us, there was a consensus of agreement that the study will be most effective if its primary objective is to provide a balanced analysis that will bring more certainty to the question whether a new airport is necessary or even desirable. This would be accomplished by coordinating existing data with new information developed on questions that must be considered before a fairly balanced evaluation can occur. We invite your city's participation in providing advice to develop an effective study, in endorsing this, and in providing financial participation in such amount as you may feel is appropriate. Rather than attempting to summarize in written form all of the considerations we discussed at our luncheon, Mayor Laughinghouse has expressed the willingness of his Council, and I convey the Richfield City Council's willingness, to provide representatives to meet with your Council and to answer questions your City may have about this proposal. Again, thank you for your community's continuing interest and for your earliest response as you consider this proposal. 1 SQ: eja cc: Mayor Laughinghouse Richfield City Council Page No. 2489 March 7, 1989 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, March 7, 1989 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular me ting of the City Council, City•of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to -order at 7:30 o clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins and Witt. Councilmemb r Hartmann had notified the Council that he would be absent. AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Witt moved adopti n of the revised agenda for the meeting. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Cummins moved app oval of the minutes of the February 21st meeting with correction., Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Witt moved approval of the consent calendar for the meetinj along with authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained t erein. a. Approval of an increase in he mileage reimbursement rate for use f a personal car on City busine s from 22.5 cents per mile to 24 cents er mile. b. Approval of a summary of Or inance No.264, (rubbish hauling or inance), and authorization for publi ation of the ordinance summary in ac ordance with State Statute. c. Approval of a dog litter s and authorization to place 10 park locations recommen d. Acknowledgment of the minut February 28th Planning Comr meeting. design, signs in by staff. of the sion Page No. 2490 March 7, 1989 e. Authorization for resubmission of City comments for the Runway 4/2 Environmental Issues hearin record. f. Acknowledgment of the Code nforcement monthly report for February. g. Acknowledgment of the Fire epartment monthly report for February. h. Approval of the list of con ractor licenses dated March 7, 198 and attached hereto. i. Approval of the issuance of a Rubbish Hauler License to Roadway R bbish through March 31, 1989. j. Approval of the List of Claims dated March 7, 1989 and totalling $143,201.72. k. Approval of the hiring of Steven Bradach as a temporary (6 t3 12 month) engineering technician at tie rate of $9.50 per hour and without Denefits. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 89-04, Councilmember Cummins moved approval of a SUTMER two foot sideyard setback variance at 1789 Victoria Road to allow the conversion of an existing garage to a family room and construction of a new 2 -car garage 8 feet from the north property line. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 89-07, Mr. Joseph Schaefer was present to request TILSEN/SCHAEFER approval of the division of Lot 5, Tilsen's Highland Heights Third Addition. It was noted that the lot is proposed to be equally divided and attached to Lots 6 and 7. Responding to a question from Mayor Mertensotto, Mr. Schaefer stated that Lots 5 and 6 are vacant and that there will be no future request for the division of the proposed new Lot 6 into two lots. Councilmember Witt moved adoption of Resolution No. 89-18, "RESOLUT ON APPROVING Page No. 249 March 7, 198 A LOT SUBDIVISION AT THE INTER DOUGLAS ROAD AND DOUGLAS COURT Councilmember Cummins seconded Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 89-08, Councilmember Cummins moved ad KUROSS Resolution No. 89-19, "RESOLUT THE LOT DIVISION OF LOT 2, BLO ADDITION." Councilmember Witt seconded th Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 AIRCRAFT NOISE Council received and discussed resolution and draft transmitt the FAA and MAC requesting the information under.the Freedom Information Act relative to Mi Paul International Airport run 11R. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Councilmember Cummins moved ad Resolution No.. 89-21, "RESOLUT CONCERNING MENDOTA HEIGHTS/EAG FLIGHT CORRIDOR," along with a the form of the requests to be the MAC and FAA. Councilmember Witt seconded th Administrator Frazell informed Walter Rockenstein is meeting Mendota Heights and Eagan staf Thursday to discuss the corrid that Mr. Rockenstein will appe Council on April 4th. Mayor Mertensotto directed sta and submit a press release to newspapers to inform citizens being taken by the City and to Mr. Rockenstein will be presen April 4th meeting. RECYCLING Administrative Assistant Batch( reviewed the proposed 1989 rec3 policies. Council noted that i resolution containing the propc would terminate on December 31, Council approves an extension. ON OF it the motion. ption of ON APPROVING K 1, VAL11S motion. a proposed 1 letters to release of f neapolis/St. ays 11L and ion of N AIRCRAFT proval of directed to motion. Council that ith the s on r issue and r before f to prepare he local f the action inform that at the cling he sed policies 1989 unless Page No. 249 March 7, 198 PERSONNEL Councilmember Blesener moved t at Janet Koelsch be appointed to the position of Senior Secretary at a beginninc salary of $22,528, and subject to a one jear probationary period. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Council acknowledged a memo from the Police Chief regarding appointment of a new police officer and informing Council that a recommendation to approve the appointment of David L. Olson will be made at the March 21st meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION Council acknowledged a letter from Dorothy McMonigal in resignation from the Planning Commission. Staff was directe to advertise for applications for appointment to the remainder of the vacate term in the local newspapers, with an appl'cation deadline of April 1st. Councilmember Witt moved to ac resignation of Dorothy McMonig Planning Commission and to com her work on the Planning and P Recreation Commissions. Councilmember Blesener seconde Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 MASAC Councilmember Cummins moved thz Friel be appointed to serve as representative to the MASAC anc pt the from the nd her for k and the motion. Bernard :he City's that Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No. 89-22, "RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING RECYCLING POLICIES FOR 1989." Councilmember Blesener seconde the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 FIRE DEPARTMENT Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of Resolution No. 89-23, "RESOLUT ON NOMINATING THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR THE 1989 M NNESOTA FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARD." Councilmember Witt seconded th motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 PERSONNEL Councilmember Blesener moved t at Janet Koelsch be appointed to the position of Senior Secretary at a beginninc salary of $22,528, and subject to a one jear probationary period. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Council acknowledged a memo from the Police Chief regarding appointment of a new police officer and informing Council that a recommendation to approve the appointment of David L. Olson will be made at the March 21st meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION Council acknowledged a letter from Dorothy McMonigal in resignation from the Planning Commission. Staff was directe to advertise for applications for appointment to the remainder of the vacate term in the local newspapers, with an appl'cation deadline of April 1st. Councilmember Witt moved to ac resignation of Dorothy McMonig Planning Commission and to com her work on the Planning and P Recreation Commissions. Councilmember Blesener seconde Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 MASAC Councilmember Cummins moved thz Friel be appointed to serve as representative to the MASAC anc pt the from the nd her for k and the motion. Bernard :he City's that Page No. 249 March 7, 198 Lawrence Shaughnessy be appoin, alternate representative. Councilmember Blesener secondee Ayes: 4 ' Nays: 0 U.S. WEST C.U.P. Mr. Ken Dahlmen was present re, continued discussion on an app. U.S. West for a conditional us, construct a utility building o: property. He informed Council result of discussions with, Cit; firm has agreed to consider an options for a combination U.S. use facility if the City will building to be located within park area. The options are: t park equipment storage room an bathrooms; to build a park equ storage room and an attached s and pay the City $20,000 for a easement; and, to build a park storage room, an unfinished ba attached shelter area accordin prepared by Howard Dahlgren. He stated that his firm is ask approval of the conditional us based on one of the three opti by Council or Council giving t: of option to the Park Commissi U.S. West can begin design and documents. Responding to a co, Mayor Mertensotto, Mr. Dahlmen he is aware that the City does currently own the land and tha would be willing to build the Centex property and give the C permanent easement to the land would then hold a ground lease City and would own the buildin Councilmember Blesener stated proposed structure had been to the two fields on the earlier also showed the parking lot ca to 60 cars, which she felt is She pointed out that the lates locates the structure at eithe parking area, which reduces pa capacity to 32 to 34 cars. Sh it would be more preferable to building where it was original as the motion. arding the ication from permit to the Centex that as a staff his of three West/City flow the he Centex build a finished pment .elter area land room and an to a design ng for permit ns selected e selection n so that construction ment from stated that not his firm tructure on ty a U.S. West from the hat the ated between ketch, which acity of 50 ppropriate. plan end of the king felt that locate the y proposed. Page No. 249 March 7, 198 Mr. Dahlmen indicated that he would have no objection to the original location and stated that it was changed as the result of his meeting with City staff and the planning consultant. Mr. Dick Putnam, present for t e discussion, informed Council t at Centex has acquired all of the property west of the centerline of Huber Drive end that the Condor Corporation has agreed to selling Centex a one or two acre site on which to locate the U.S. West building. He stated that if Council agrees with th idea of the building, its location could b determined by the Park Commission and he would appear before the Commission to see w ere they would like the building to be located. Councilmember Blesener moved aoption of Resolution No. 89-20, "RESOLUT ON APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NOR HWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY," subje t to City Council approval of the final esign and location of the building follo ing review and recommendation from the Pa k Commission. Councilmember Witt seconded th motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CJ HOMES Council acknowledged a memo from the City Clerk regarding the licensing of C.J. Homes as a general contractor. Administrator Frazell informed Council that Mr. John Schwab, of C.J. Homes, has ask.d that the City proceed to document complints against the firm so that he can respon . He stated that staff will proceed to doc meet the complaints. TRAFFIC ISSUES/N.W. Mr. Tom Colbert, Public Works Director from ORIENT DEVELOPMENT the City of Eagan, Mr. Glen Van Wormer, from Short Elliott Hendrickson Eagan's traffic study consultant, and Mr. John Shardlow, representing Northwe t Airlines, were present to discuss Northwest's proposed development plans and traffic implications for the Dodd/I-49 interchange. Mr. Colbert informed Council tat Dakota County, Eagan and Inver Grove eights entered into a joint powers ag eement in Page No. 2495 March 7, 1989 1987 for preparation of a trans plan/traffic-forecast to provid analysis of transportation issu 2010. He briefly discussed det report as well as potential de the southeast quadrant of I-494 Road. ortation a detailed s through ils of the lopment in and Dodd Mr. Van Wormer reviewed the T.B. 149/I-494 traffic study and roadway system concept recommendation prepared by his firm for the City of Eagan.. The three representatives then responded to Council questions and comments. Mr. Dick Putnam, whose propert; affected by the proposed conce: that is very difficult to.tell drawings the extent to which'h would be affected. He pointed of the things his firm has tri its development is to address over air quality, and is plann the freeway. He asked how the to deal with the air quality i ramp proposed is built adjacen residential development. He s the ramp is built above the fr than depressed, it would be al impossible to do anything to m problems associated with it. After discussion, Mayor Mertens informed Mr. Colbert that the c will be directed to respond to within two weeks. The Council cited the following concerns: 1 being directed to the north -- done to direct more of the tra: increased traffic and the impac 149 north of Mendota Heights Rc does not want a cross-over int( Heights, particularly where it line up with existing Delaware coming across and interfering i residential or park developmen" T.H. 55 is being downgraded. l Mertensotto pointed out to the representatives that the Counc objection to the concept of a interchange north of the freew, would be t, indicated from the s property out that one d to do with concern ng to berm parties plan sue if the to his ated that if eway, rather post tigate the Otto ity staff the study specifically raffic is what can be fic south; t on T.H. ad; Council Mendota does not or Dodd, ,ith : ; and why .1 has much lead -ended Ly. Page No. 249 March 7, 1989 COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Blesener asked staff to look at additional trail locations for the dog litter signs. Mayor Mertensot o suggested that Councilmember Blesener give staff a list of suggested locations. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before Council, Councilmember'Vitt moved that the meeting be adjourned. Councilmember'Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: o TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:18 o'clock P.M. Kathleen M. S City Clerk ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor nson LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCI] ON MARCH 7, 1989 Concrete License: Dakota Rhoads Masonry, Inc. Gas Piping License: Northland Mechanical Contractors, Inc. General Contractor Licenses: J.L. Junkman Construction, Inc. K & K Heating & Plumbing,•Inc. Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses: Dayton Bluff Sheet Metal, Inc. Northland Mechanical Contractor, Inc. 1989 RUBBISH HAULER LICENSE: Roadway Rubbish CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ma March 13, 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council and City K�tor FROM: James E. Danielson and Tom Olund Public Works Director Public Works Superintendent SUBJECT: Purchase Replacement Pickup DISCUSSION: Public Works Superintendent Tom Olund's pickup truck was "totall when another pickup truck crossed the centerline and ran into Tom on Wheel Trail on January 25, 1989. Tom received a concussion and some manent damage to the ligaments in his knee but is now back to work. truck that was totalled was a 1988 GMC that we purchased for $12,311. June 29, 1988. Our insurance company will reimburse us $11,475.00 m' deductible which we will receive when out insurance company collects the other driver). Tom has received the following bids for a 1989 re ment truck: Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet $12,238.00 Grossman Cheverolet $13,060.73 Rudy Luther's Pontiac - GMC Truck $13,281.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council award a purchase order to Jeff Bel! Todd Chevrolet for their low bid of $12,238. Funding for the vehicle be $11,475 from insurance reimbursement for Tom's wrecked vehicle and reamining $763 will be equally divided among the three Public Works departments. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they s pass a motion approving the purchase order to Jeff Belzer's Todd Che in the amount of $12,238. d" agon on ($500 m ce- ;er's will the d et CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 15, 1 TO: Mayor, City Council and Citmi r or FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Mendota Heights Business Park (MAC Property) Final Plat Case No. 88-11 DISCUSSION: Council approved a preliminary plat for the Mendota Heights Park (MAC property) on May 10, 1988• Since that date United Prop been working with Dakota County to try to get some driveway openi proved for along Pilot Knob Road. The County finally agreed to a driveways after the City agreed to take over Pilot Knob Road nort Trunk Highway 13 .as a City street. isi.ness ,ties has ;s ap- Low the of future United Properties intends to complete final plats for indivi hzal areas of this plat as developers are located. This allows them to retai as much flexibility on lot line locations as possible. The first final pl t is attached and is to be the new Big Wheel Auto Headquarters site. The City agreed to pro -rate the park contribution for this p t as building permits were issued based on land area. The park dedication for this lot will be 6.24 Acres/44.56 Acres X $33,670 = $4,715• RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Mendota Heights Business Park plat be ap- proved as submitted. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation the should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 89-_, RESOLTUION APPROVIN FINAL PLAT FOR MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS PARK. City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89 - RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS WHEREAS, a final plat for Mendota Heights Business Park has ben submitted to the Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said final plat; and NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of th City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the final plat of Mendota Heights Business Park sub itted at this meeting is hereby approved subject to the following condition: a. Payment of Park Dedication of $4,715.00 2. That the appropriate City officials be and they are here y authorized to execute the final plat on behalf of the Ciy of Mendota Heights. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 21$t day of March, 1989• CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS PARK AvuAm 7 Zf ? to. P.1 MENDO 1 ?4V '4�4 3 fmi 0 DPW$ "44 SITE PLAN Ml IRSTAft 494 I. UNITED PROPERTIES 3500 West 80th Street - Minneapolis, MN 55431 - 12-831-1000 ABATEMENTS -- Michael & Pauline #27-22501-020-01 Mendota Hei.ghts, 886 Marie Avenue March 6, 1989 O'Brien The house was assessed as being a t basement when in fact there is not City of The estimated market value should b 152,900 to $139,400. The assessed reduced from $5,352 to $4,879: story over basement. reduced from lue should be CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 13, 19891 TO: Mayor, City Council and City rator FROM: Tom Olund Public Works Superintendent SUBJECT: 1989 Street Sweeping DISCUSSION: The following bids were received from four contractors to swe City streets this year: Knutson Klean Sweep, Inc. $51.00 per hour Clean Sweep, Inc. $53.25 per hour Crosstown Sweeping Corporation $56.00 per hour Loomis, Inc. $58.50 per hour The estimated total hours for street sweeping is 180 hours (1 $51.00 = $9,180.00). The budget amount for street sweeping and striping is $11,500. Work is to be completed on or before May 15, 1989• Knutson Kleen Sweep, Inc. has done sweeping in the City and the performance was excellent. RECOMMENDATION: Award the street sweeping contract to Knutson Kleen Sweep, Inc, their hourly rate of $51.00 per hour. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, they should 1 a motion awarding the 1989 Street Sweeping contract to Knutson Kleer Sweep, Inc. M4 at ss CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 9, 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council, CityJ� i strator FROM: Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Sign Permit Approval at 1960 Dodd Road, Fina DISCUSSION: Staff has received an application from Suburban Lighting, Inc. requesting Council approval for 2 - 45 sq are flat wall signs. These signs are proposed to be install d on the south & west sides of the Fina Mart. (See attache drawings). The Fina Mart Building is located in a B-2 Z ne. The B-2 zone allows a maximum of 100 square feet of advertising space per sign. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend approval of the s'gn permit as requested for the two 45 square foot Fina Mart signs to be located on the west and south side of the building. ACTION REQUIRED: If City Council wishes to implement tr staff recommendation to approve the sign permit it shou] pass a motion of approval. APPLICATION FOR SIGH PFRMIT CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ACKNOVLEDGE,IMENT AND SIGNATURE; The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the penalties of the aclion herein requested, that all .rlalemeids herein are true tthhe� ordinances of the City of Mendota Heights, the State of SWNATU law, for the purpose of inducing the City f i)fendola Heightr to take and that all work herein urentioned will be done in accordance with Minnesota, and rulings of the Building Department. . . APPROVED PERMIT FEE SIT! ADDRESS DATE PERMIT NO. _ PROPERTY OWNER (Name) (Address) (Telephone No, CONTRACTOR (Name) (Address) 4!�ji 7WO(Telephone o.) Type of Buihiins ConstructionUsed As .Building To Be Completed 1`� i�tCE i✓ Old e--- New O Es�ssated Cod -mv f Contractor's City license No. Building Permit No. TYPE OF SIGN 2— WALL JW ROOF 0 PRojEcTiNc. O GROUND D MARQUEE O TEMPORARY O OTHER MAX. DIMENSIOtt VERTICAL :3 FT. HORI EONTAL �-� FT. SIGN AREA S' SQ. FT. ewt , Na. OF SIDES DISTANCE FROM GROUND TO SIGN BASE FT. HEIGHT OF SIGN %S FT. SETBACK OF SIGN FROM PROPERTY LINE FT. ILLUMINATED YES JR) NO 0 ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA ON PREMISE SQ. FT. SKETCH OF SIGN S19 z e 7- t`S T 15.5 ACKNOVLEDGE,IMENT AND SIGNATURE; The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the penalties of the aclion herein requested, that all .rlalemeids herein are true tthhe� ordinances of the City of Mendota Heights, the State of SWNATU law, for the purpose of inducing the City f i)fendola Heightr to take and that all work herein urentioned will be done in accordance with Minnesota, and rulings of the Building Department. . . APPROVED X:77 .7- A .41 �' MlN..'Sfm FASCIA 90 3 9e Wi. STRIPM - 34 63 _F4 IW MAX. STRIPING5 r UF FINR FAIL00 lE j��Rj L I L � 11--, 34 �2T'__- 96 MIN. STRIPING 14 7' 168 s 7 8 124 EUILMd GRAPHICS1 45' MIN. SIZE FASCIA 7� 3/4 144* MIN. STRFING 50 1�0 L.C. 77 252 MAX. ST 20' • 112 - 77 71 3' A OA AAWW t Al Ljo JL3 • MIN. SrRMNG' 9 iWMAX. STRIPINGZ 6" ING - GRAPHICS F BUILD 1 60' WW Sb:E FASCIA 2 8 192 MIN. STRIPING -67 5/8" = I80-(2)Lq336" 156* -- - - '!__: - - ql MAX. STRIPING8 0 1 2 20 N*--- - , �_ 7HR 2 1 INA ART - " - ull _= f L675/go 14 �8" 192" MIN. STF;NPINL-*'-._j�,_.__7 Z 336m MAX.. STRIPING -P: 148' BUILDING GRAPHICS11 screen graphics,-InC. AG. DIV ...... TOLERANCES 64SDStNGLERD - IjOUSTON.TXT70Q2 P.O BOX 4465 - W)USTCK.TZ77210 • DECIMAL .0625 MATERIAL FRESSLIRE SENSITIVE SCALE • VIN sv R. MIM -";- ArvRovEDJKS FRACTIONAL TITLE 24% 36N,48". BULMIG7 GW 1/16' lAFRI AW-AILAR 11 DATE 5-19- DRAVVING NUMBER G OTY DESCRIPTION CC;;� ITEM CODE DATE SYMB REVISION RECORD DR MATERIAL LIST REVISION BLOCK TITLE BLOCK CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 13, 19891 TO: Mayor, City Council and Cit ,);d'(q0s rator FROM: Klayton H. Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets Val's Addition Job No. 8815 . Improvement No. 88, Project No. 4 1 DISCUSSION: As part of the Val's Addition project, the developer requested very large trees be transplanted. Due to their very large size, mo: movers can not handle the trees in question. One company, Minnesot� Landscape, Inc., has indicated they can handle trees of this size. that six t tree Valley The developer has requsted that the City accept Minnesota VallWs proposal of $3,148.20 to move the six pine trees. All costs incurrd as a result of the moving could be charged to the development. r RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council authorize a Purchase Order for the transplanting of six pine trees in Val's Addition for an amount not to exceed $3,148.20 to Minnesota Valley Landscape, Inc. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with the staff recommendation they should motion authorizing staff to prepare a purchase order to Minnesota Landscaping, Inc. 0 s a CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY CCOUNCIL FROM: KEVIN D. Z- CITY ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: Multi -City Joint Powers Agreement to Provide Recycling Services at Goodwill Center on South Robert Street DATE: March 17, 1989 Council will recall that we have previously participated supporting the Goodwill Recycling Center in the Cub parki lot along South Robert Street in West St. Paul. The citi of West St. Paul, Inver Grove Heights, and South St. Paul also participate, with all costs coming from Dakota Count Grant Funds. Even with the advent of curbside recycling, the Goodwill Center will still have a function in the communities' recycling strategy. The Goodwill Center accepts many it (i.e. appliances, clothes, etc.) which cannot be placed the curbside. s The four cities have negotiated a new agreement with Goodwill, basically providing that we will reimburse them $20 per ton for recycled materials. This cost figure is very consistent with other operating costs we are incurring for recycling. Under the attached Joint cities, each of us pays or $5 per ton, and gets opinion, this is a very Mendota Heights, since w involved, but will enjoy ACTION REQUIRED Powers Agreement between the fo one fourth of the reimbursement 25% of the tonnage credit. In m favorable arrangement for the Ci e are the smallest of the four c 25% of the credit. Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to execute the Joint Powers Agreement to provide recycling services between the cities of West St. Paul, South St. Paul, Inver Grove Heights, and Mendota Heights. KDF : j ak Attachment st, of ies 1 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE RECYCLING SERVICES This Agreement made this day of 1989, among the Cities of West St.lPaul, South ST-715—aul, Inver Grove He—i—gTi—ts, and endota Heights (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Cities). WHEREAS, the previous Recycling Joint Powers Agreement betweeln the Cities has expired, and WHEREAS, the Cities desire to continue to maintain a recycling center, NOW, THEREFORE, The Cities hereby agree: 1. To provide financial support for the joint recycling cener during 1989 in the sum of $20.00 per ton of recyclable material collected, comprising $5.00 per ton from each of the four member cities. I 2. To distribute the tonnage credit (for such recyclable material collected) equally to member cities. 3., To continue to have the City of West St. Paul act as "lead city" for the Cities, contracting for the operation of the recycling center, and paying all bills for the center when due; from the following sums.placed cn deposit with West St. Paul by the Cities during 1987: West St. Paul $1,916.00 South St. Paul 2,180.00 Inver Grove Heights 1,783.00 Mendota Heights 727.00 It is hereby agreed that any excess monies remaining on Decenber 31, 1989, from the above account shall be returned to the city of origin, and that any city needing to contribute an additional sum to *reach the aforEsaid subsidy level of $5.00 per ton shall settle with the lead city at the same time. 4. To continue the recycling center at the same location (Wstview Value Center) and with the same contractor (Goodwill Industries) u less mutually agreed otherwise. I I 5. The joint recycling center shall be available for use wil to race, color, creed, religion, sex, or national origin. 6. This'Agreement may be terminated by any member city upon days notice to the other cities. This agreement shall take effect 1989, and continue in effect through December 31, 1989. hout regard sixty (60) January 1, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TREASURER'S REPORT, JANUARY, 1989 DAKOTA COUNTY STATE BANK Checking Account 5% Savings Account 5 1/2% C.D. Repo 03/1 7.7% Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. CHEROKEE STATE BANK C.D. due 03-13-89 @ 8.75% Savings Cert. 8-28-89 @ 8.55% Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. U.S. TREASURY BILLS July 6, 1989. 7.90 (1mm) $ BALANCE $ 7,356.11 471.45 330.000.00 $ 337,827.56 315,000.00 100,000.00 200,000.00 $ 350,000.00 13,952.59 $ 363,952.59 700,000.00 100,000.00 928,897.50 928,897.50 COLLAT $ 615,( $ 800,( ITIT13were, Value 2L28/89 est. U.S. Treasury Money Mkt. $1,500,000.00 ($1,610,000.00) Fund (8.64) GOVT, SECURITIES FUND, $1,200,000.00 ($1,490, TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $4,330,677.65 Funds Available 12-31-88 $5,273,390.77 Funds Available 01-31-88 $4,125,000.00 Increased balance primarily due to increases in G.F. TI Engineering Fund. Rates, Money Market Feb. 28 Bank 7.60 LES:rmd Fid. 9.02 03-1-89 4M 8.76 )0.00) (10.7%) District, RUBBISH HAULER LICENSES FROM APRIL 1, 1989 TO DECEMBER 1, 1989 BFI Action Disposal BFI/Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc. Knutson Rubbish Service, Inc. Krupenny.& Sons Disposal Service Mendota Heights Rubbish x i LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL, ON MARCH 21, 1989 Concrete License: y Miller Brick & Stone Excavating License: Eagan Excavating Co. General Contractors Licenses:, Al Herrmann Construction, Inc. Bohnsack & Hennen Excavating Craig Hoff, Inc.. Countryside Fence x Custom Pools, Inc. McKnight & Associates, Inc. Metropolitan Fireplace T's Landscaping Unipro Construction Company i Heatinq & Air Conditioning License: Burnsville Heating & Air Conditioning Plastering/Stucco License: ; Jerry's Drywall Service RUBBISH HAULER LICENSES FROM APRIL 1, 1989 TO DECEMBER 1, 1989 BFI Action Disposal BFI/Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc. Knutson Rubbish Service, Inc. Krupenny.& Sons Disposal Service Mendota Heights Rubbish 6 Mar 1989 hu 12:57 PM ema Check Number' Tei o. Check umber Vendor Name 1 AT&T Claims List3/21/t City of Mendota Height Account Code 01-4210-020-20 Dept 10 -Adm Dept 50-Rd&Bridge 15-Engr 60 -Utilities 20 -Police 70 -Parks 30 -Fire 80 -Planning Page I 40 -CEO 85 -Recycling 9"- nimaL-Control Comments Mar Svc Amount 5. 27 IR i Totals Temp Check Number r 5. 21 `eri-m- Check Number i Totals Temp Check Number 5. 21 `eri-m- Check Number 2 Acro of Minn _2 01-4300-110-10 type pads/magnets 22.03 Huro of Minn 4 —Totals ei=4300=030_30 Syly Kdiser 2- 51.53 Temp UMeck Murilber- emp Check Number 3 3 Atlas Alarms Install smoke detectors 2,240.00 Totals Temp Check Number 3 LRC-QK NUMUer 4 4 B & J Auto Supply 01-4330-490-70 mise parts 36.41 4 B X J Ruto Supply 4 B & J Auto Supply 01-4330-490-50 m1sc mise parts parts 2 W. 4 3 31.68 Totals Temp Check Number 4 a a. 542 VIM Check Number" 5 Bills Bun Shop 01-4305-020-20 amnio 112.08 otals Temp Check Number 5 emo Check Number 6 R, ev i n L. d/lb rfivg 6 Kevir, Batchelder 01-4415-085-85 Jan/Feb wileaoe mileage 18 45.10 Totals Temp Check Number emp, Check Number 7 I bifTs Inc Mar rent 7 ._.1. ..2. 00 --T3-t`aT-s-Te-mp CneCK Ivurii5er LS Mar 1989 Fhl.t 12:57 PM remp Check Number 8 I -soja. Check 4umber Vendor Name Maims List City of Mendota Heights Account Code 8 Board of Water Comm 49-4460-654-00 0 Totals TemD Check Number 8 ren, P-7Chzrtrk-1vU n, be r �I 9 Chapin Publishing 43-4240-847-00 Totals Tamp Check Number 9 Comments Svc Conn 87-7 ad for bids 87-2 Pace 2 Amount 1,034.26 1, .c 99. 90 Tamp Check Number 10 A;U L,.L 1, YV VSUPPly 10 City Motor Supply 01-4330-490-70 part mise '301 carts 134. TDO 22.90 10 City Motor Supply 15-4330-490-60 Ot-4330-490-50 part 402 65.70 I W--UTT y ... MUM- 10 City Motor SQ15ply Supply 01-4330-490-50 Part cors 301 301 25. Ybtb 142.60 10 City Motor Supply 01-4330-490-70 mise parts 31.74 60 421.94 Totals Tamp Check Number 10 Temp Check Number 11 t! r-tty of St paut I— I v. v'O 11 13.00 Totats. Temp Check Number Terno Check Number 12 12 Copy Duplicating Products 01-4300-020-20 Fax paper 86.65 Totals Tamp Check Number 12 13 Totals Tamp Check Number -13 Temo Check Number 14 —14 Creative Colors misc solys -Vz 16tals Temp Check NUMVer 14 -4F:429:;70 429. 70 .6 Mar 1989 Claims List Page 3 rhu 12;57 PM City of Mendota Heights temp Check Number 15 4 e M Q. Check 4umber Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount 15 Dahloren Shardlow Uban 01-4221-135-80 . D Totals Temo Check Number 15 Check Number 1 S 16 Dakota County Chamber of Comm 01-4400-110-10 Feb retainer monthly meeting 11.00 16 11.00 Totals Temp Check Number 16 Temp Check Number 17 11 UaKota County lech Inst 1-t- I course 17 Dakota County Tech Inst 01-4400-020-20 Feb trainino Totals Temp Check Number 17 r4mm-Cmeciz lqu n4ber 15 18 Davis &' Lagermar, Inc 16-4462-000-00 41W.9u. wwj 120. 00 4 ;.*-1U. ww aopraisal Curley & BOB 2,200.00 2,200.00 Totals Temp Check Number 18 1 Teruo Check Number 19 IS 13rant Endlerilann mileage 2121 Unra 31-3 19 7. 63 —;otals lemp Cneck MurtJoer Tem::) Check Number 20 20 General Communications 01-4330-440-20 radio rDrs 111.30 Totals Temp Check Number 20 fir T-j'MB' UliecR Numt5er 21 Goodyear Service Store 01-4330-440-20 tires/mounting 121.98 21 121.98 Totals Temp Check Number 21 rem..j Check Number 22 EE Gopmer State Une Call 15-4e1w-wMw-bw FeD CaiiS -37. 50 6 Mar 1969 Claims List Pane 4 'hu 12:57 PM City of Mendota Heights emp Check Number 22 Check Jumber Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount Totals Temo Check Number -6y&O-CIMOR Number 2 3 23 Burt Club Lake WMO 18-4404-000-00 1989 contr 577.38 23 577.38 Totals Temp Check Number 23 1 Ferro Check Number 24 E" Great ww5tern iron Lt. Metal flar iron 24 31.80 ---T tals Terno Check Number 24 Temp Check Number 25 25 Harmon Glass 01-4490-110-10 Totals Temp Check Number 25 I tERRIV ChecK Number 22, S 26 Herman Miller Inc 08-4600-000-00 as Totals Temp Check Number 26 Femp Check Number 27 2AU 27 —T�Itats Temp Check Number, Ferro Check Number 28 desk glass 115.32 office furnishings 11.1. o a 5,117.84 5,117.84 508.43 28 1 0 S 01-4330-440-20 March cooier mscn 65' 0 12) Totals Temp Check Number 28 'ivna heck Number 29 as I C M A R C 01-2072 3/1 payroll 107.70 e -,::t I U P1 H K L; ;$/Ivj payroll 90. 25 I telfili LA --- k- 16 Mar 1989 Claims List Page 5 rhu 12:57 PM City of Mendota Heights temp Check Number 30 etlip. Check Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount 30 Identi Kit Co 01-4305-020-20 otrly rental 102.00 Totals Temp Check Number 3141 I Od. 14W T -EMI Checl< Plumber 31 J & A Cleaners 01-4410-020-20 Feb clng 120.i0 31 120.10 Totals Temp Check Number 31 TemR Check Number 32 ZE James Kilburo 3:=1 totais lemp Check Number Temp Check Number 33 33 Knox Lumber 08-4335-000-00 mise mzcn solus bw. V110 60. 00 88.53 00. Totals Temp Check Number 33 Tera o CnecK Number .34 34 Knutson Rubbish Service 08-4335-000-00 Dec svc 24. 62 34 24.62 Totals Temp Check Number 34 Te.,ap Check Number 35 --35-KreCIIS UT I ICw MaL'M!n&!5 prt wnee2 22. 00 35 22.00 36 Kremer Sorg & Align 01-4330-490-50 rors 308 974.14 Totals Temp Check Number 36 Ta -MO UhecR Number Z 37 ,.Labor Relations Assn I8.75, -37 5 Mar 1989 hu 12:57 PM emp Check Number 38 Teedo. Check umber Vendor Name 38 Lakeland Ford Claims List City of Mendota Heights Account Code 01-4330-490-50 Totals Temp Check Number 38 gip-Chenk Number 3,J 39 Jamie Lerbs 01-4400-030-30 39 Tstals Temp Check Number 39 emp Check Number 40 40 Leef Eros 01-4335-310-70 40 Leef Eros 15-4335-310-60 120 Totals Temp Check Number 40 emg Check Number 41 i 41 —'M ma Check Number emp Check Number 42 f 42 M C F O A 05-4404-105-15 Totals Temg Check Number 42 :m -mw 43 George Lowe 01-4400-030-30 Comments rprs 86 Ford FF safety schl Page 6 Amount 297.54 60.00 reo svc Feb svc 9.65 Feb svc - 9.70 29.00 I ; 149. 25 Mbrshp Ward 15.00 FF safety schl 60. 00 _� t 43 TotaTernp" Check`' ls . i Number 60.00t ."e.W.;•.'+.ir gyp.,.+: *'%G r+'!Iy»«. tit" - w.*h T: Avt �A K A <' .r.? #.,^ s!;!=t^'!49'F--'•ws... 'r..+±.'i^.'Lj;�., ihlo-.:�:: 'emp Check Number 44 "-`-44 Mendota— — —J Feb2U.75 44 Mendota Hghts Rubbish 01-4280-310-70 Feb svc 28.75 44 Mendota Hghts Rubbish 15-4280-310-60 Feb svc 28.75 _•_�44 1-tenduta Hants Kut5tslshFeb 176 ..i,a. _ ..._ _ •st'e:" ;<;;:"x*:;: ,,;;:xa..,' •,�'"�*•��r.'' Svc. :;�' _ w •=s�::. :ti. K,.-'�-�?�';.�x;„.Y _;: 2S _ ' ._=-.;;.;.... �; ,=-•' �. .6 Mar 1989 Claims List Page 7 -hu 12:57 PM City of Mendota Heights 'ernp Check Number 45 IernD. - Check Jurnber Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount r 45 Midwest Siren Service 07-4330-000-00 Mar mtcn 62.40 -- J Totals Temp Check Number 45 i:.. eraa Check Number 46 Miller Printing 01-4490-109-09 type for plaque 48.00 Miller Printing — r — J— J recyc ing splys c J. 46 Miller Printing 01-4318-085-85 recycling solys 700.00 -------------- Totals Temp Check Number 46 �emD Check Number 47 Minn Cellular Tele Co 01-4210-020-20 Feb svc 3.90 47 Minn Ceiluiar IeIe Co I-eO svc 94 4.20 — i o a s lemp unecK NumBer ferno Check Number 48 48 Minn Deot of REvenue 01-4320-050-50 Feb fuel tax 131.40 48 s 1. 40 Totals Temp Check Number 48 f e7rTtSL.Meck Number 49 49 Minnesota Blueprint 05-4305-105-15 mise splys 119.09 —413 Minnesota Blueorint mise soi.ys 16. 90 137.78 '—i3itals jorap E;MecK Murtiber Ternp Check Number 50 50 Minn Fire Agencies 01-4404-030-30 morsho a5.00i -- • .-.>nfi�`...7i..T=�;FTX`i.,T>3';'�:.•"o�-`..:•.V+`•rttiT y, �' i�r.. �Lx�iy�`•• � .. ._.�.�- ., �+�]>T-..:�4Uu.;y `3W.i �v+t', s; ;,j�-T i-_ J7y�!+.J"It• Mt{.r a _.'f4'" W`_Yta'.'': r .. - ---- !.. +ifc" - '+".i•- K' �.ti'^ J Totals Temp Check Number 50 ' OW I ; i'�iSTrCri'�EK'N[triTtsL� 31 t 51 Minn State Fire Deot Assn 01-4404-030-30 1969 dues 90.00 51 y 90.00 i Totals •Tern Check'Number .:y. - 51 YY. 4= '• e- -dk"L' ^ h::i' 1*i- Jc .aw.y k «_: % s`'N.-s=y>;=_.. rierao:Check-.Nurnber"--- --52-. 6 Mar 1989 Claims List Page a 'h IA 12:57 PM City of Mendota Heights emp Check Number 52 Check lumber Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount 52 Minnesota -Conway 01-4305-030-30 Roof hook 84.00 Totals Temp Check Number 52 -amn..7-une R-Nufatler M4 53 MUniCi-Pals 01-4404-110-10 mbrshp dues 53 5.00 Totals Temp Check Number 53 emp Check Number 54 ::t4 Mn Dept Public SaTety 0;-4400-OdO-eW E/8 trng 0 Ia 54 Mn Dept Public Safety 01-4400-020-20 2/15 & 16 trno 60.00 Totals Temp Check Number 54 53 55 NSPE 05-4305-105-15 Contractor forms 100.00 55 100.00 Totals Temp Check Number 55 emp Check Number 56 DIaCk exp relmo Fire scnis 56 65.35 -at- -mv -eheck Number , rts-T-L ewo Check Number 57 57 Northern STate Power 01-4212-315-30 Mar svc 616.33 57 Northern STate Power 01-4212-310-50 Mar svc 933.73 STItte F -ower Ot_42i2_2tO_70 i9ar 5�4� Zj / Northern tSfate P;:Mer 15-42T.-StO-60 57 — Noi-ihern' STate'�Power N 01=4212-320-70 15 5 7 57 Northern Northern ST.Ite STate Power Power 08-4211-000-00 Mar Svc 14. TDO 701.18 57 _57 Northern STate Power 08-4212-000-00 Mar svc 962.25 1 NoVItMer-ri S i ate Power 01-4211-313-40 4-+.!5. r_:4 57 Northern STate Power 01-4211-310-50 Mar Svc 225.17 57 Northern STate Power 01-4211-310-70 Mar Svc 225.17 Norlenern S I ate Power A. I I I VJ-bvj erz. IS 684 • %.r, .4 f>>_.o3. 86 a. 10111P Chwak Number, 6 Mar 1989 Claims List Page 9 'hu 12:57 PM City of Mendota Heimhts emp Check Number 56 Check lumber Vendor Name Account Code 58 Northern STate Power 28-4211-000-00 58 Northern STate Power 01-4211-420-50 5u i45rtnern Slate Power W 1 -42 1 1 -,Mw- / 0 58 Northern STate Power 15-4211-400-60 Totals Temp Check Number 58 emp ChecK Number 59 Oxygen Service Co 01-4305-050-50 ,J'j Uxygen tie Uo lotals lemp CnecR Number Vd Temp Check Number 60 Comments Amount Mar Svc Mar Svc Mar SVC Mar svc 613:94 107.75 .7l C. C! 363.11 4. 20 12.60 60 Pitney Bowes Credit Coro 01-4330-440-20 Dict eq 156.00 A. zj. Wyj Totals Temp Check Number 60 emp UnecR Num0er 61 61 Public Empl Ret Assn 01-2074 Mar prem 36.00 61 3E. 00 Totals Temp Check Number 61 emp Check Number 6--, 52 Rehrig Pacific Lu Recycling bins VIVJ 62 6, 52e. OV-) —TtitalS I&T413 F-MeLIR Nurilt5er emp Check Number 63 63 Brad Ragan Inc01-4330-490-50 rprs 301b2 - Totals Temp Check Number 63 64 64 S&T Office Products 01-4300-020-20 wise solys 52.00 IS&I -urrice Products P't n 64 S&T Office Products 05-4300-105-15 '4300-110 w mise splys a 461.54 64 S&T Office-Products`�-, 11`Zl mise S�Rl S -Y 4'4e .6 Mar 1989 'hu 12:57 PM emo Check Number 64 I ern p. Check dumber Vendor Name 64 S&T Office Products 64 S&T Office Products 6-4--owF-ur f I ce Product s 64 S&T Office Products 64 S&T Office Products E•40 --TI_Itals Temp Check Number femo Check Number 65 65 J L Shiely Co 65 J L Shiely Co Claims List City of Mendota Heights Pace incl r Account Code Comments Amount 01-4300-040-40 05-4300-105-15 01-4Z16-065=85 01-4300-020-20 05-4300-105-15 01-4421-050-50 01-4421-050-50 130 Totals Temp Check Number 65 femo Check Number 66 ++-bb Snyder rU g Stores 1411- 66 Snyder Drug Stores 01-4305-020-20 L Jc' Totals Terno Check Number 66 emp MOM Number 67 Softwarefirst 01-4301-110-10 pens misc solys SG arnu5 rnisc solys rtn 1.20 100. 97 db. 01 18.62 128. 88cr 53.60 sand/salt - =r 2,287.64 sand/salt 650.81 rake solys rnisc splys software 2,938.45 'Y. 77 1.39 r 6' 149.00 67 149.00 Totals Temp Check Number 67 remo Check Number 68 •---FJ13--st Patui Staillp wwr,kL,- *90-800-30 89 DVq tal4s55.50 - 68 St Paul Stamp Works 01-4490-110-10 Rubbish hauler licenses 291.00 i- . J o a s Temo Checkr Number - :t'^ ...i '!r`�a"°y.�:...'3_. _.: s'..:'tn'�' "[ -.. -. ._ - �..+ .. ...;:5 :::.� .,. .... ..q:._- '� .ti+, ti. "_ Mr ••-x=t;.,sw'^x^_��r.'� ;,.,..�,-'.. •_isTt�:�;:i r�'�f.' �'¢'r'•: _ii.�;+s; :- - ::d«x::.•_..�•.. avr`=-� . .. . ..v rlys. F3"':F-i-::}_,- i'emo' heck Number 09 69 Sun Sales 01-4305-050-50 hand cleaner 24.00 t 1 Sales 69 Sun Sales WI--+IWvQ-vWf-IW 15-4305-060-60 Mand1 hand cleaner G 24.00 t —207 Totals Temp Check Number 69 i mv Check Number R .✓z _ _ _ . ... ..•...- ......-. .. z -...ems � _ - v _ _ i _ _ _ 0 G T _._. � `—_ 6 Mar 1989 hu 12:57 PM emo Check Number 70 Check lumbar Vendor Name 70 Sun Newspapers 70 Sun Newspapers Newspapet,19 70 Sun Newspapers 70 Sun Newspapers Claims List City of Mendota Heights Account Code 01-4240-110-10 01-4240-110-10 43-4240-847-00 59-4240-864-00 4.20 Totals Temp Check Number 70 emo Check Number 71 /I Iractor 15upply 71 --fo als lemp Check Nurilber . emp Check Number 72 72 U S West Communications 01-4210-020-20 72 U S West Communications 15-4210-060-60 72 0 S West Communicat Ions 72 U S West Communications 15-4210-060-60 72 U S West Communications 01-4210-070-70 Comments ord 262 ord 261 PUD nra no hr -a not 67-2 hrg not 89-1 Mar svc Mar Svc Page 11 Amount 18.26 I ec:. Oil_ 48.49 154.83 -1v 86.85 276.85 .51+..3b 34.58 34.56 -so 467.40 Totals Temp Check Number 72 1 emo Check Number 73 73 Unite6 States Sait.ln 73 Idtals lemp CRecR Numbet- err-3 Check Number 74 74 West Photo 01-4305-020-20 polarizer ,otals Temp Check Number 74 -ewa UheoR Number 73 Zee Medical Svc 01-4305-050-50 medical solys --7z, lee inedIcal Svc medical spiys 75 Zee Medical Svc 15-4305-060-60 medical solys Totals Temp Check Number 75 2, 629. 39 6 Mar 19139 Claims List 'hu 12:57W PM City of Mendota Heights emp Check' Number, -76 Check lumber Vendor -Name Account Code 76 I ChecR NUMOOF-- t:F 4� 6059 ...,-Page 12_1 7" Comments 161.94 G. T. 106,555.80 MANUAL CHECKS 12030 68.75 'Inver Hills Com College REgr.•D. Ward 12031 '140.00 MPC& PI review 88-4 .12032 150.00 Minn Dept of Health 12033 6,266.89 PERA '2/24 payroll 12034 5,224.50 Comm.of Revenue 2/24 & 3/10 SIT _12035 11,816.19 —DaRota county State Bank 3110TIG FICA, MEDICARE, 12036 - 850.00 3/10 Payroll deductions 12037, 2,794.70 SCCU 12038 37,471.20 64,772.23 G. T. 106,555.80 A 1t CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 13, 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council and City �7� trator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Solvay Animal Health, Inc. Planned Unit Development Case No. 89-06 DISCUSSION: At their February meeting the Planning Commission conducted a hearing to consider an application from United Properties for a va conditional use permit for a planned unit development and prelimin for the Solvay Animal Health, Inc. building (see attached staff me There was no public at the hearing but the Planning Commission its number of technical questions concerning the facility. Mr. Glowa to answer some of the technical questions and promised to try and technical designer of the building at the City Council meeting to any unanswered questions at that,time. RECOMMENDATION: xblic UIL. -, y plat S). f had a s unable ve the dress The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approva of all the requests subject to final approval by City staff on engineering matters to include water and air filtration, waste disposal and landscaped tails. Note: Staff has no technical expertise in water and air filtration or hazardous waste disposal, if Council agrees with Planning Commission on the need for a City review of these matters either the City will need to hire an independent consultant to advise us or we will need to complete the require- ment some other way such as having United Properties' consultant certifying reasonable design and compliance with all State and Federal guidelines. ACTION REQUIRED: =If Council desires to implement the Planning Commission reco they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 89-_, RESOLUT APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LIMINARY PLAT FOR THE SOLVAY ANIMAL HEALTH, INC. BUILDING and det form for reviewing and approving the water and air filtration sys waste disposal methods. tion ID PRE- iine the is and J City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89 - RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS CENTER 3RD ADDITION WHEREAS, United Properties has applied for a Conditional Use a Planned Unit Development for Block 5, Mendota Heights Industrial together with a preliminary plat; and -mit f or irk WHEREAS, the Conditional Use Permit provides for variances to qllow an 8.5 foot wide parking stalls and 4 parking stalls per 1,000 square eet of office space; and WHEREAS, the application for said Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development and preliminary plat have been duly considered by 1he City Planning Commission and the Planning Commission has recommended the approval of said Conditional Use Permit and preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the first phase of the Planned Unit Development is to Solvay Animal Health, Inc. building; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on said application'as required under the provisions of the City Zoning Ord NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: be the e. City of The application of United Properties, Inc. for a Conditional U e Permit for a Planned Unit Development and preliminary plat for Mendotl Heights Business Center 3rd Addition is hereby approved subject to fin 1 approval by City Staff for engineering of the Solvay Animal He lth, Inc. building to include water and air filtration, waste dispo al and landscape details. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 21s day of March, 1989. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk •4 0 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO February 22, 1 TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson and Paul R. Berg Public Works Director Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Solvay Animal Health Inc. Case No. 89-06 nY crtr«rnm United Properties was recently successful in acquiring the Solva Animal Health, Inc. corporate headquarters within their Business Park This facility is to be construction on Lot 1, Block 1, Mendota Heights Business Center 3rd Addition. It is presently unknown what will be constructe on Lot 2, Block 1, therfore a Planned Unit Development modification will be processed prior to the development of Lot 2. Because Solvay needs to occupy the building by August 15th, a b ilding permit has been authorized by the City Council in advance of approva of a planned unit development and replatting (see attached letter of expl nation from United Properties and staff memos to Council). This developmen is intended to be of a'similar quality as the other United Properties d velop- ments within the park. Like the other United developments this prof ct will also require variance from the ordinance requirements for parking sp ces for office use. The City's ordinance requires five spaces per 1,000 squ re feet and United Properties is proposing 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet. nited is also requesting variances from the ordinance for stall width to 8 51 versus 9t. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct a public hearing to consider a conditional use permit planned unit development for Mendota Heights Business Center 3rd Ad preliminary plat approval and variances on parking ratio and stall Make recommendations to the City Council on the following requests: .1. Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development. t 2. Preliminary Plat. 3. Variances: a. Four parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of office per 1,000. t b. 8.5 foot wide parking stalls versus 9 foot wide. r a tion, a dth. esus 5 United I Properties Development Company, Came No. 89-06 P#oe 2 5. 16 the layout of the building, the driveways orient to the s uth (on Northland Drive) and to the west (on Executive Drive) and are immediately contiguous to the proposed lot lines. It is the dEveloper's wish to odd the condition that additional parking spaces will intent to have these drives shared by the contiguous development in the future. Thus, there needs to be a cross easement providing for the � mutual use of these driveways for the development proposed iow and for the future. This concept has been frequently used for the Southridge Development and the original Mendota -Heights Indust-ial engineering and landscaping, be uarc for final ocar, review. Park structures. It is more efficient to do it this way, reducing th amount of asphalt and theoretically providing more landscaping space. � after the building is constructed. Normally we look for o._ This is one of the reasons vvhv the application is for a PUD nce this is one of the techniques for handling approval of such shared driveway system. si 6. Another aspect of the development relates to the amount of parking provided for the structure. Parking will consist of 173 spaces for the structure of 59,547 gross square feet. The Ordinance requires 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of net usable office space. This is usually about 80 percent of the gross square footage. Thus, the net office space (as defined in Section 18.1(2)b) is approximately 80 percent of 59,547, or 47,637. (Rounding off to 47,000 x 5 spaces per 1,000 = 235 spaces.) 7. The proposed development plan proposed indicates a total of 2. 1 spaces to be built, if necessary. United Properties proposes to build 173 parking spaces (in the front of the building) with the capacity to add an additional 58 spaces. The reason for this approach is that the total number of employees anticipated for the structure is 130. Over half of the structure consists of laboratories, the occupants of which +1so have separate offices. -Thus, if there are 130 employees, it would #em that 173 spaces is more than adequate for visitors and overflow neeqs. The variance request is for e reduction in!.parking. mpeoee pr6vided to 173 versus the 235 required. The Planning Commission and Council may wish to odd the condition that additional parking spaces will be provided if they are determined to be needed. The 58 additional sraces are shown to the northeast of the building an indicated by the do hod lines on the site plan. engineering and landscaping, be uarc for final ocar, review. ' 8./ � /\ reduced drawing of the proposed 1andoo-r'-'g is included — 'Vith this application. United Properties Development Company, in previous ` .developments -in Mendota Heights, have consistently done quality ' ~~'~~~~,^''g on their p~~r~^^^~~^ It ~nr~~^~ that the proposal consistent with that policy. 9. We suggest that the Planning Commissioni Council consider any � -,,'-'-' _ the PUD with __ condition__ that final_details, engineering and landscaping, be uarc for final ocar, review. This provides for some degree of flexibility in some plant material decisions � after the building is constructed. Normally we look for o._ .= eo that � . might constitute an improvement, but never o reduction in overall � level of quality or quantity. ` | lO. In the attached applicants' statement, they propose to re uce the � parking bay width to 60 feet. We hov� no problemwith his mince United PropertiesDevelopmentCase No. 89-06 3 | . ' | parking accommodation for employees on an of f ice site. They also propose to use an 8-1/2 foot spacing for parts of the site due to the reduced size in cars today. The accommodation of office parking at 8-1/2 feet is a well accepted principle. | 11. Overall, the development proposal is consistent with the level ol quality that has been previously accomplished by the applicants in Mendota Heights. It appears that the building will look good on the site and will make a significant aesthetic statement at the far east enc of the business park. The development proposal will be a useful and positive addition to the Mendota Heights business and industrial scenE. The approvals requested include: a) Approval of a preliminary plat; b) Approval of a PUD with drawings submitted and rev! wed on February 28, 1989 and subject to final approval by City Raff for. engineering and landscape details; c) Approval of variance 'to parking bay to 60 feet wide and a spacing of B-1/2 feet; and d) Approval for reduction of the parking requirements to 173 spaces with the condition that in the event that additional parking is needed, it will be provided as indicated on the site plan drawings as ` � ` | / ,ROpi SUB,jf(;T V)• 1 t�14RTN 11_2p0` SCALE 1 " .li.. t ©R!VE53 � stt pr '60c) i i +84 St r, T1' � • � 5 E\S,4 x ! s MEDALLP • • ij • .l SUBJECT PROPERTY NORTH SCALE 1"=400' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 13, 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council and Ci d4rator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Storm Sewer 963 Chippewa Avenue and Adjacent Areas (Morin) Job No. 8903 Improvement No. 89, Project No. 2 nTcr.TTgernN• Mr. Robert Morin owns a home along Chippewa Avenue that has thre undeveloped lots attached and would like to be able to sell the lots development, however a wetland that has no outlet is located in the z the lots. Before the lots can be developed a storm water outlet neee installed. Mr. Morin petitioned the City to install the outlet and has completed a feasibility report that shows the costs and proposed schemes (see attached report). RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends Option 2 within the feasibility report. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct the required public hearing, staff will be prepared to g oral presentation, then select a course of action and if Council desi proceed with the project pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 89 - RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFIC FOR STORM SEWERS TO SERVE 963 CHIPPEWA AVENUE AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMP MENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 1) or ar of to be aff ending .ve an -es to E IONS VE- CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO February TO: Mayor, City Council and City�or FROM: Klayton H. Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Feasibility Report on Storm Sewer Morin Property & Adjacent Areas Job No. 8903 Improvement No. 89, Project No. 1 INTRODUCTION• Mr. Bob Morin has requested that -the City complete a the storm water problem that he has on his property. The map shows the problem area. There is an existing storm po no outlet that sits on his property. Mr. Morin's land ani land of his neighbors drains into the pond. In the past ; or so, Mr. Morin has had to pump the pond dry many times severe basement flooding. Therefore he would like the Ci• install an outlet for this pond, which would eliminate fly his existing home and make it possible for him to develop for single family homes. Attached is a letter from Mr. Mi regarding the history of the problem. DISCUSSION• The attached drawing shows the pond location; draina and the layout of two possible storm sewer routes. Both and B will drain the pond for about $20,000, assuming the project is coupled with the Colon project. The only diff between routes A and B is that route A requires a potenti expensive easement, and also won't drain the pond as low B. Route B is capable of draining the pond four feet low route A, which is important given the water problems Mori in his basement. Thus route B is the preferred route wit of about $20,000, including engineering, overhead, and contingencies. There are three options available for funding this which will be discussed, including: 1) Assess all costs to Morin. 2) Assess Morin for trunk costs then assess Morin and all contributing properties for the remainder. 3) Assess Morin for trunk costs then use General Obligati cover the excess. 2, 1989 study of attached and with I the 0 years :o avoid :y to coding of two lots grin e area, outes A Morin rence lly more s route r than has had a cost ect other ie The first option, assess Morin, has some credence si: the largest benefactor and has requested the project. Hol Morin requested the feasibility report because he felt th, properties are benefitting as well. The second option involves assessing Morin for Trunk then dividing the remaining costs among all the benefitti properties (i.e. all the properties in the drainage distr including Morin). This option uses the philosophy that a properties in the district are receiving some additional even though they've paid assessments in the past. Morin for hooking up to the existing system and for the constru the new one. So in effect, the other properties in the d would be receiving a credit for assessments paid in past (Imp. 75-8 and Imp. 79-3), because they wouldn't be payi trunk assessment. ice he is ►ever, Lt other costs ct, 1 enefit ould pay tion of strict roj ects q a If Morin's property were assessed for the trunk hookup at the same rate that other neighboring properties were assessed when these past projects were constructed (adjusted for inflation/ interest), his assessment would be $0.1516 per square foot. For his 39,010 square feet of previously unassessed property, this would result in a total trunk assessment to Morin of $5,9'4. The remaining $14,086 would have to be split amongst properties in the drainage district. The result would be additional $0.1138 per square foot for the 123,750 square the drainage district. Thus Morin would be assessed an a $5,917 for all his land in the drainage district (four to roughly 52,000 square feet). The remaining 11 lots in th drainage district would be assessed between $500 and $1,8 depending on the size. The 3rd option is the use of General Obligation fund cover portions of the construction costs. The reasoning this option is that the City should participate because o omission of this storm sewer from past City projects in t Of course the City has generally not used this reasoning past. A reasonable allocation would be the remainder of after Morin's property is asssessed for trunk costs. Bas this is just an alternative to assessing the neighboring properties. The result would be that G.O. would pick up The funding options are summarized below: OPTION 1• PARTICIPANT Morin FUNDING TYPE Total Assessment FUNDING AMOUNT $20,000 TOTAL $20,000 all an feet in ditional s with X ng to ehind the e area. n the he costs cally, 14,086. OPTION 2• PARTICIPANT Morin Morin Neighbor Lots OPTION 3• PARTICIPANT Morin City FUNDING TYPE Trunk Assessment Second Assessment Second Assessment TOTAL FUNDING TYPE Regular assessment General Obligation TOTAL FUNDING AMOUNT $5,914 $5,917 $8,169 $20,000 FUNDING AMOUNT $5,914 $14,086 $20,000 RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends Council accept the Engineer's Repo recommends Council choose Option 2 as the best funding o ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with Staff's recommendation, Coun should pass a motion adopting Resoltuion No. 89- , RESO. ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON PR, STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE 963 CHIPPEWA AVENUE AND AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 1). and on. it UTION POSED ADJACENT Robert A. Morin 963 Chippewa Ave. Mendota Heights, Mn. 55118 January 16 City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 Attn: James E. Danielson Dear Jim: The City issued a building permit for my -house to be in 1955• The building was completed in the fall. In 1958 Chippewa and Mariam streets were graded and pav however the street grade was raised 12 feet. This highe made my lot lower than the paved street, and also the 1 finished lot on Block 2. Water drained from the gutter street, down my gravel driveway and on top of my drain and into my basement. In 1963 when the sanitary sewer and water project was c I installed a cement driveway and raised the street end driveway up to the top of the bituminous curb. This sto water from the street draining onto my lot. During the sewer and water project, the Contractor filled-in Simar thus trapping the water on the Block 2 low area. This a interrupted the normal drainage pattern in this area. I Ed •Kishel and told him to put in a culvert under Simar catch basin on Block 2 low area. He said there was noth budget for this, when a storm sewer is installed in the would be the proper time for the installation of a catc OU -1 ; • rL; grade est the eld npleted, of the ped the anitary Street, tion contacted or a ng in the future, basin. In 1976 a feasibility hearing was held for Northeast area Improve- ments #75 - Project #8. I talked to Ed Kishel again abo t a catch Basin and he said nothing was set up in the budget for 1his. I reminded him about our conversation of 1963 and he said he did not recall. When we have wet weather the water percolates through the ground from the low area on Block 2. I had a drAin tile system installed below the foundation footing on�he outside of the building in 1969, connected to my old septic tank system. I pump this when needed. I have been pumping for a little over 25 years. I feel < for the wetland would correct a•large portion for the ni future pumping. I also feel that there should have been provision made to drain the water from Block 2 at the had Simard filled-in. Please advise. Sincerely yours, B , q: `�12a L R. A. Morin n outlet ed of my some Ime the City City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89 - RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STORM SEWERS TO SERVE 963 CHIPPEWA AVENUE AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 1) WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 21st day of March, 1989, al 8:15 o'clock P.M. or as soon as possible thereafter,in the City Hall the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota pursuant to resolution duly adopted by_ the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights on the question of the proposed construction of the following described im- provements: The construction of a storm sewer system including appurtenance; and incidental thereto and the acquistion of easements, in and i area hereinafter more particularly described. WHEREAS, due publication of the notice of public hearing on said pro- posed construction has been attended to; and WHEREAS, mailed notice of said hearing has been mailed more than 10 days before the date of said hearing to the owners of each parcel situated within the area proposed to be assessed, all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes, and WHEREAS, the City Engineer reported that the proposed improvement am construction thereof were feasible and desirable and further reporter on the proposed costs of said improvements and construction thereof; and 519 or the WHEREAS, the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is situated within the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnes to and is more particularly described as follows: North of Miriam, south of Simard and west of Chippewa Avenue WHEREAS, the City Council then proceeded to hear all persons interes e in said improvement and all persons were afforded an opportunity to present their views and objections to the making of said improvement . NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows: 1. That it is advisable, feasible, expedient and necessary tha the City of Mendota Heights construct the above described impro ements, and it is hereby ordered that said improvement be made. 2. That the City Engineer be and he is hereby authorized and directed to prepare plans and specifications for said improveme 3. That said improvement shall hereafter be known and designatE as Improvement No. 89, Project No. 1. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 21st day of March, 1989• CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By _ Charles E. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk otto, Ma�or CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 16,1 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adi�Eor FROM: James E. Danielson Eublic Works Director SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets Ivy Falls Creek Addition Job No. 8704 Improvement No. 87, Project No. 2 DISCUSSION: Bids will be,received at 10:00 A.M.:on Monday, March 21st fol the above project. Memo and resolution on bid award will be availabl Tuesday evening. ACTION REQUIRED: None. Information only. MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS March 16, 1989 TO: MAYOR AND 9ITY COUNCIL FROM: KEVIN CITY ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION REGARDING UPGRADE OF CITY HALL BASEBALL FIELD Council has previously been advised that the Parks Comm was considering upgrading the City Hall baseball field, the request of Mend -Eagan Athletic Association. The Citizen's Parks Review Committee has also endorsed upgr this field as a part of meeting the ballfield needs of community. Attached is a site plan and itemized cost estimate as prepared by Senior Engineering Technician Tom Knuth. Th Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed this proposal a meeting of Wednesday, March 15, and voted unanimously to endorse the expenditure of up to $40,000 for the upgradi the field. This upper dollar limit can easily be met by exercising deduct item #16, which calls for simply repai existing grass on the outfield, in lieu of a complete resodding job. With an underground irrigation system in place, we should have no problem maintaining a good outf In order to expedite the construction, staff proposes th let the different cost items by purchase order, rather t taking sealed bids on the entire job. Our Engineering Department is currently soliciting cost quotations on th larger items (i.e. fencing), and those will be presented your approval at the meeting of April 4. ACTION REQUIRED Unless Council does not wish the City to proceed with project, or has other comments, no further action is required. KDF:jak Attachment sion ger its g of ing eld. t we an for s Score boa+ -d a - Fere I o 0 13 O i� — 275� -- 4' Ov4-.o{_Play Fe,+CE Toolbox Bleache —� VI C t o L)rv� C, 4 -VN" 11 OJ 0 Civic Cem�e►-- BQ//Fiet� RenoV^4-)sN rroj. 8410 i CIVIC CENTER BALLFIELD RENOVATIONS Item Quan. Unit Description @ Unit Price 00 Amount 1. 1 Each 16' X 201 X 161 Backstop with 41 @ $ 2,000 O0 000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 6,000.00 hood. 7. 1 Each 2. 470 LF 81 Chain Link Fence. @ $ 12,00 $ 5,640.00 3. 610 LF 41 Out -of -Play Chain Link Fence @ $____1O,00 @ $ $ 6,100.00 $ 500.00 with gate. 10. 6,000 4. 1 Each Rec-Rock infield with Mound, Home @ $ 31760-00 $_121000.00 $ 3,760.00 Plate & Tool Box. SUB -TOTAL @ $ 39,000-00 $ 2 000 00 5. 2 Each Players Benches with Concrete Apron. @ $ 1 000 00 , 6. 1 Each Outfield Irrigation. @ $ 6 000.00 $ 6,000.00 7. 1 Each 42 Seat Bleacher. @ $-11000.00 $ 1,000.00_ 8. 1 Each Scoreboard. @ $ 500.00 $ 500.00 10. 6,000 SY• Sod Outfield (after season ends) @ $ 2.00 $_121000.00 11. SUB -TOTAL @ $ 39,000-00 12. ENGINEERING AND CONTINGENCIES (207) @ $ 7,800.00 13 TOTAL @ $ 46 800.00 r DEDUCT ITEMS 14. For 5 Hose Spigots in lieu of Irrigation, Deduct $4,500. @ $, 15. For 30 Seat Bleachers in lieu of 42 Seat Bleacher, @ $ Deduct $300- 16. For Grass Repair with Topsoil & Seed in lieu of Sod, @ $ Deduct $11,000. 17. TOTAL DEDUCT ITEMS @ $ 18. ESTIMATED TOTAL (Item 13 minus 17) @ $ MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS March 16,1 To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevinz�s�fV,1,�1ty Administrator Re: Citizen's Parks Committee Review Recommendation Attached is the packet of information for the Citizen's Review Committee meeting this coming Monday evening, Ma 20th. The enclosed materials detail the Committee work date, but is, of course, subject to amendment at the Mo evening meeting. Assuming that the Committee adopts a recommended progra Monday, consideration of that recommendation will be in on your agenda for the Council meeting Tuesday,'March 2 Council would be asked to approve a parks development c so that we could proceed toward implementation. Two sp actions likely to be requested are: 1) sending the prop for development of the Henry Sibley parcel to School Di 197 for their consideration, and 2) commencing discussi with C. G. Rein Company regarding purchase of the Menda site. Council action to actually set the date and amou a referendum would not be until at least the second mee of April. This memo and attachments are being placed in the front your packet (Mayor Mertensotto and Councilmember Blesen previously have received their copies) so that you are of the Committee proceedings for Monday evening. Howev this packet also constitutes all the information you ar receiving at this time for Tuesday's Council meeting, s will also want to place it in the appropriate place for reference at that meeting. The Parks and Recreation Commission considered the prop package at its regular meeting this week, and voted unanimously to pass a resolution commending the Citizen Review Committee for its work and strongly endorsing thi proposal. A copy of that resolution is attached. Councilmember Cummins has also left the attached letter endorsement. IBM rks luded St. ncept cific sal trict ns ota t of ing of r ware r, Vide, sed S of PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89 - RESOLUTION ENDORSING CITIZENS PARKS REVIEW COMMI RECOMMENDATIONS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Hights has appointed a Citizens Parks Review Committee to study th issue of a Parks Bond Referendum; and WHEREAS, the Citizens Parks Review Committee is co prised of many diverse segments of the community of Mendota H ights and reflects an effort to build consensus and participationt and WHEREAS, the Citizens Parks Review Committee h s made a dedicated effort to understand the parks and recreation issues and has designed a comprehensive proposal for improving and building upon our parks system that reflects a broad community consensus.- NOW, onsensus: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE Parks Commission of the City of Mendota Heights, that the effort and work of tha Citizens Parks Review Committee is to be commended, as it has in orporated all the elements of the parks system and has utilized a process that reflects community participation:' BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Parks Commission fully and wholeheartedly endorses the Citizens Parks Review Committee's proposal and recommends approval by the City Council oE the City of Mendota Heights. Adopted by the Parks Commission of the City of Mendo a Heights this Fifteenth day of March, 1989. PARKS COMMISSION CITY OF MENDOTA HEI James Stein Chairman, Parks Com fission ATTEST: Kevin Frazell City Administrator J4 cl, t g ; -JA1611data Hei )3; 1�2A p IA 40k i t P-IF7 TAIA-"j 1101 Victoria Curve-Mendo ta Heights, MN - 551-18 -47 0- 1850': C p IA 40k i t P-IF7 TAIA-"j 1101 Victoria Curve-Mendo ta Heights, MN - 551-18 -47 0- 1850': e Tjx V y MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS March 15, To: Citizen's Parks Review Committee From: Kevin Fr , Y Administrator Re: Materials for March 20th Meeting MEETING REMINDER Next Meeting - Monday, March 20th 7:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers BACKGROUND MATERIALS Enclosed is the background materials for Monday evening's meeting. Included you will find: 1. Site plans and line item cost estimates for the thr ballfield complexes. Please note that the cost fo the "neighborhood park" type improvements are itemized, but the costs are transferred to the New Neighborhood Parks budget. 2. Synopsis and cost estimates of improvements for "neighborhood park" type improvements in five new parks (Sibley, Mendakota, Centex, Hagstrom-King, a Victoria Highlands), and eight existing parks. 3. Map and line -item breakdown for the trails system. 4. Memo from me, dated March 15th, outlining potential parameters for a joint agreement with School Distri 197 concerning the joint development of the Sibley park. 5. One-page property tax impact analysis prepared by Ci Treasurer Larry Shaughnessy. Please note that the second column in the matrix assumes a $2.5 million bond issue. UPDATED COST ESTIMATE The enclosed materials represent the changes made by the 989 ty Committee at its March 13th meeting. The total cost of proposed improvements is now $2,811,596. This is only a $25,000 less than when we started our meeting on the 13t however, significant changes were made in the respective Ballfields and'Trails budgets. Comparisons are: Prior to March 13 Ballfields Trails Ngbr. Parks - New Ngbr. Parks - Existing TOTAL $ 1,748,000* 603,408 245,904 244,218 $ 2,841,530 Current $ 1,619,00(* 687,64 242,13 267,85 $ 2,816,63 *Both figures include $473,000 of land costs at Mend 1 t Significant changes between the two proposals are as follows: Trails - All trails costs, including those trails in t e neighborhood parks and ballfield complexes ar accounted for in the Trails budget. In addition, two new trail sections have been added: 1) along the north side of Highway 110, from Valley Pa k to Dodd Road, and 2) along Wentworth Avenue, from Wentworth Park to Dodd Road. Neighborhood Parks - Trails are deleted. New playgrou d equipment is added for Rogers Lake and Valley Parks, while playground equipment costs were cut for Ivy Hills Park. $2,000 of "enhancement" are added for the Curley's tot lot. Asphalt parking is added for Valley Park. The youth -sized softball field at Mendakota Park is added. It should be noted that asphalt parking lots sire not proposed for Friendly Hills or Rogers Lak Parks. Also, curb and gutter of parking lots is not recommended in any of the neighborhood pa ks. The Committee may wish to discuss this. Ballfields - Trails were removed and accounted for in Trails budget. $50,000 for a second comfort station in Centex Park was removed (one will l provided in a joint venture with U.S. West on north end of the park.) The soccer field in Mendakota Park is changed to a youth softball field, and the cost of that improvement transferred to the Neighborhood Parks budget. e Ithe ISSUES FOR THE MARCH 20TH MEETING Among the issues the Committee will want to discuss at it: March 20th meeting are: 1. The total amount of the referendum and the tax implications thereof. 2. Whether the $180,000 of special assessments on the Mendakota and Centex parks should be included in tl bond issue, or paid by the City from other operatic funds on an annual basis. 3. To what extent, if any, we wish to use some of the Parks Development Fund (current balance $ 365,000) offset a portion of the costs of the proposed improvements. 4. From a marketing standpoint, whether the $473,000 o land cost at Mendakota should be shown as a part o the Ballfields costs, or as "Acquisition of Open Space." to 5. Whether the City should proceed with acquisition of the Mendakota land, prior to the referendum. 6. Developing a "theme" for the parks development p yam. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 15, 1989 TO: Citizen's Park Review Committee FROM: Jim Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Trails Committee Proposal DISCUSSION: Attached is the current trails layout and cost estimate prepared by the trails sub -committee. CONSTRUCTION OF COST ESTIMATE FOR PROPOSAL New Trail Construction $553,040 Three Highway Crossing Improvements $ 20,000 at Highway 110 $573,040 Contingencies, Overhead, $114,608 Engineering (20%) TOTAL $687,648 is TRAIL DESIGNATION / i.m SEGMENT WIKMNOEOLENGTH OFBITUmil SEGMENT TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION/LOCATION m ° (Rmvwmw B' Nin.) y` EDGE OF BEHIND PARK OR �$ GRAVEL ROADWAY CURB 3' OPEI- 4 STATUS EXISTING TRAILS/PATHS YEAR TOTAL COST BUILT COST PER FT. FUNDING SOURCE PRUPOSED CONSTAUCTYON/IHPROYEMENT CONST. TOTAL COST DATE EST. COST PER FT. FUNDING SOURCE 4 aDESCRIPTION a> ,4hszIE AYE. A LF=lubTLa i• vicToeiA • uoo C4. 1982 H•S•A– ;coos $ YvofoRlA 4o=1156614V • • 1400UHr4 0 (988 T46u) DEU6LOPNEiT C 2356 $eupt,.- 4- VAUq &K• • 1150 u.R o" 1189 '111soo°- atoms° fArz Fvuvs D ✓Au,, -t f'agt:� -1. Tbw CD • • 1500 L•. P -R11- 615,aaolo • lo= YANK _ 7a >'-6'UrlA .r : o 3loo ua n Doo°'t io' vaK s;OD6, VIGTUeIA kv 2 A MAele 'fD • • goo G„{{. `i gue4emeir -Jb,16GA'S EbuaA6 -6GoNT J) • • 2m unll� rutUtE 'FVol 000� 20!e ?AU FvNDS I C-WTV-JDA4 -i6 HW13 • • (d7o ti„ S. fuTURi MN DoT T� fbiA Vlct09lR,Ac4Z°sg,T3S FuTue 60066F "M U6Y0&.e rp • • 1000 b.rT WIXYDAL& CE 0° ? • • t000far, AU.E WPMCI E s��nT MN W i VAUEY fA9K 3 A t W4 110-6 eI6 • a 2$00 e oee - /g an 7'° %k< 8 - -fb 0 ub • D L; o • PW9 (Extsr.) oo el< �1 C "E•P (�xsT fAP-KC LA;t AUETrot,) ${ Lin t f O • � 3 2oD'a• 14 0, ?A� _ 1y,rue5 • Pfh�•K (O�r57:} a� to p'° !.l ° e VLAcg • t`fID Ltnf'f. O r /J,�,.} Pft�1� U, muoP-"1M ke A kal Pyx -6 Oxmoz 04-0K 8 -� WUTUIQM69K • • 11D0 .,, 171, �` C} a xw% 15V _ IMK G wameg flk v. 4. roDD sw LIJir F 0 la me, /540 YAR ---- (AKK PtAC A BwF;rGlecL--40 AtEyf�x • • kb Air. L' • 1987 Nua'DEJaap�tEur .. ir.��gkti A)wr LJ° A a6 wo PARK- • • (in fl. • PACK 71fA1L. .. r ,,-r AdC ?•e% • • 1 Ln PT, 1 1146 -� 25 1 OAK g e '� str • • 148 t�1e� T� �A)T TRAIL DESIGNATION J OZSCRIPTION - .� t.0.1 SEGMENT INTENDED USE BIKE WALK SKI JLENGTH OF SEGMENT TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION/LOCATION -STATUS _ _ /, ,,r! y 'La ntTua�tu e' min.) a'" EXISTING TRAILS/PATHS PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION/IMPROVEMENT GRAVEL EDGE of BEHIKO PARK OR GR `�a"� YEAR ( TGTAL CGST FUNDING SOURCE RGAORAT CURE 3' A c BUILT LOST PER FT. CONT TOTu DATE EST. CDST COSI FUNDING SOURCE PER FT. �YGVi4t1t�ACG �sy 7/. 1 ��Yi�ll AGl6 (,sffiKf . • • • 28M&B,. o _ _7Q0— .Z5- .ift< arr4&)z Al �l�i I�1,ei Cqw, �v • • rfODGn "" °° Z pffreK c-wppmw ,,4v,w 4 &r11 -h Au US • • 3= b, % ' c' 5� 25 "W< Hca AWN c f rhly 1"."q $��a� �Q ea Mel< flopp fix A &a -,,A) • •-Pico 1arf • HN N ... 5.7"H 1 l�j 8 Ewe ,v M60ra4ery • • m 4• • Av Do C rz v •r4 .Ljog- m • sft L+H 0. • �l T D a 7y. l/0 • • lig FI • Fr�taeE n/ PO 6x157 1b i & . 1 a e r4 '* • 1 1�ff• {yruas o Mu 1bT• 1= T Gi Gi • G'e�• • 0 �1NZb EX/57 I�nJ trlu1 74 iSJ°� • • 7m Zia • T; H sr. Mu li HEu•NGtS.�o. I-'�9�f • laro Gv FUrv,ee gN ➢o r ,F,q—,gzxry &00 c1H R. ati ',Wcz DIz 4 A AW1e 4 611 ,�YAWIJ& 15'7 pG., ,aw �a co, ,ea. !03 E#1 -� G'l • •_ZQQL.f • Cover t�t {y+ !�lrfRJE • +• 2000 ° Esvu C E< rte( d • oo NT D 5 Lft �ndG fld na • • O 1 /o �° P4,-< u, ro f lqqff6= a m ' W y8 coa°° ao°� A,erc (c«rN*Y ? l~ urs~t2 CctPE¢Fre • O 1400 , FUTueta fie°o-` ARtC LAd JfeO •h67; Gav�zF�engQ._ •„ • v 1300 ' FUTURE 0 Fuiv2B . �1O Pry utr FoFurzrzt CvavT LL 15pq r[ Z ANti�7�FbU5 70 lY! •f �ELEA) b I (aN Nc 1 _ i r�5E35ETj � Eu.&j4o r*teeso,U • • 3 oD GNFr Ttl 0 4150 •25 pick 111.. + •'c+. f.l nyr,„G: "'r ,:lal...0 •.a-3': .. ;;�t; _ _ /, ,,r! �:-> TRAIL DESIGNATION / DESCRIPTION I.O.I SEGMENT INTENDED USE BIKE WALK SKI LENGTH OF SEGMENT TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION/LOCATION -STATUS 5tT0N1N (R«amend [t' Mtn.) �� EXISTING TRAILS/PATHS �aoa EDGE OF 5EHIN0 P� OR �� YEAR I TOTAL COST GRAVEL ROAMY CUM ]' SPACE GUILT COST PER FT. FUNDING SOURCE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION/IMPROVEMENT ConT. TOTAL COST DATE EST. COST I PER FT. FUNDING SOURCE c 1�!;k ov _ A I Dr fw.)tE an dLt/ • •woo G • Jq5A Minds i /6HrS yy. g 1 add T//l T3SE • • " S E 6UD6 E • • . 4A,.A:• 98 ,N.v 7)a D lr,95745 -%D SS • • /f • 8'f MSR Ards ff_&Vss #A6 AW e f 0RQ f P/[o7 6 -b -rp / • • 1500 o ee 2 Soo '.!V5 V�fKA #44&-�- 7�R• A De,4wv-6 f�AG/E • .NSR 9wc 8 APAu,%;-ARRV-149 D • goo Li" Af3,4 MUJ ANP5 • ! GAFF • l Ev6coPE2 C1 f DARK A",,y 7� VIP, H' A1F,e5�-A �16V. Atsk • • eo LmR. • l9fg V--V6k0 _ ?21G15Ed/E1J Or 9- A-cv,Crl�il5vx. • - � -GAF{ • l9Flg _ —._ �Yr-�aG�X — dEA,•+415-CacDcSAc • • qo0 Gu - colic GChWI, 'JI(TE p A Aaet 7b llae6> mt- - •r /Sootf7. - - — - YRQK{�/HUTE�UitnYEa�xu' AA4 bo4J 4)Yga_ !S A EEui &re o -k Y 3SE • • %0 bN r� 0 19 f9 .ysA -3SE SQwLi'�E O • Go�c. ?oo - • �1 f2 A, POT C T-356 A A6,67s AP,r • • • /9$2 C T ji 6EPS f1 e ploDD ZD. O •3too" MUM �c'GOiLl9l� A A #aso-- • • 46 O� FvEQA1RTE 070N is u vow �6 T.v dFP,44< ro E rr 7.) Num • • 3foo ziiU/'� �NR& 0 '' I.0°" 36A� PA2/� M6-,Vwrg ootAZ4 • 2100 Lu . O ��T Ezs7 (ARK/f#WaAu) '1115-pod, Mz, iI; EtiDAK07ft n"?itTES g A 1JODp i2D . 31001/,,8 i y� SuJpw Vr. cul-Df-W J WAf,A J GINEEL • • (o�L� 1 � � 25 MAK x '. �.; _- l.• _; aV t yti•�`,a.�^;••_ ..A� x -r. .�� Z. lL,. `'_..�. .C?L•. J -e :..a.wr .r h:� �r �u �s � 5 ..Z �-•+.k.:....a. t .4.r� ..1 ..r.t'i. TRAIL DESIGNATION / DESCRIPTION i.m SEGMENT INTENDED USE LENGTH OF SEGMENT BIKE MALK SKI TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION/ LOCATION - STATUS °tiliml (Recamwnd 8' Mtn.) �a EXISTING TRAILS/PATHS curet R ST BEHIND ' a �� BUILT I ATL v�ER FT. FUNDING SOURCE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION/IMPROVEMENTEDGE cm- ET$TUCp$7 p�ER FT FUNDING SOURCEDATE a o a� ,2cr,� �f}KE PAR.I� 6 A Co 09604) A4WAIP t f»cc fo gi�W7,,9 ,yecrsrs Rn • • 3cao Gul't • PAQK L�XW670A) %] ,¢ 4'VWl IkIS A - p e c • • 530 L'lrr c p M5,4 coa,vey ''�E C•2- 43 8 btu kyavlO > //O • • 2 [b a ,ee � iySA(co-Nry) E o Nw ro • • 50 • • /9 Py Pi9r2K T% /0 TO R410je • • 4/00 • f 444< E .yM2/ DOu6A45 • • 1200 Pilo" ez A2 GvvTy ? L'u2GEy5 (a A W 4)11ar.46 % T • • 60 Ue q • Affs 1411 D07 Cues ToT !o7 • • /9f5 Poax, G Cvue" 'lb brR(CtA • • 2300 - - • (9 f5 P s e6=T it rl flEupaTq �ca A s-wc- �o GJrl�sy • • �/oo GN`r • Se fod/ Drsr /9 SRi2r 8 caddc%Aic {o �E • • laooLu 300 G, urc7oRlii 'ev. FROM nae cszrnw7vm 7o sunrnarm. • • 1460 IWIj p #3500.as PEAK .«mi; c.4�iE• COAC r% rcroai,+ 0 5cmx[ sire • • 50o LW • 8 j%vc/ - E 7YNc5GWoc Sire To A 7H#$b0'o • • 4u�r O 50 sc//YOG s/TL• OP 4&wNr/ R.1mlee r a�P• TO [.Esinl6rd j O • w 41;vr, �3od� .,s P/toT K,WB ;2o,917 CD. go 3/ TH' SS A -#74 -A //E� �nrs r2� • • / ooL.,pT • € G��.,f 6 Aw.96r5 • Po fkx/A • • .440-- O� Cou,vr / N„/LbT Auu,77f� cvv _ • • /00 "^ k`a`eG Cuu�v / fINL r A Acw.4 -{o TW //o • •w tab Lwfi•• 0 o 1992 b1N Do //O A NorA f4aw -b T1/ s5 • • 32co.Grr �o � /19Z AV Lbr 8 r#95-10COZI&Ad1rE • • I-,w !;u . Www /99Z xv ro a Ckoner Anure -A 1,Eriv6, • • 2?m Lir . • / TJF1rEltll�ie ., ... ... •: � Y `i ,.>,. '. �e_•,t: ?.f-. y..:i l,• •Y,' . ., .. � ?�-.,7. - .. . 'ir.. i.`= -i5� ii.� - "r' ,f:� r,_ x� TRAIL DESIGNATION! DESCRIPTION I.D. SEGMEM INTENDED USE LENGTH OFattv+tNous SEGMENT TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION/LOCATION -STATUS "a en (Recomd 0' Min.) EOM OF BEHIND PARK OR GRA4FL ROADBAT CURB 3. OPEN [r°fC o a, tt EXISTING TRAILS/PATHS PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION/IMPROVEMENT BIKE WALK SKI tFui ( BUILT TaTAL CAST CDST FUNDING SOURCE PER FT. NATE TOTAL EST. CDSt �� PER FT. FUHDIriG SOURCE rai le o alb r) eeoa)u Pf dc. VODDw) • • lgco b,,,r ells #34)0)x'' 20°° I PAW SjEL=w -m tie zR- • • Som L A)rr RPTLRE i),as,,�* .2s Qtl LAoe P, ST. A SyLVANDAL e, 'TO -BOVAI E�- sc moot.. • • 1100 L,.,'Ff. O E F�nva 1,900 b' PaP- WAR2l0R Ve. j A NwY • 1 t 8 Td '=Gttao L LOT- AR xs yEL.I ANG • • /I LIN a - ♦�dO—• rL�J Pf�i G:PPER1=iCsL.D A COPPER.i='t64..O tu+bEl2 -}*-D " e • 27ooLDs�t Ctln,c • � b� DQl�t-v d<- A2�A RAI W&W 7-62. trI92S tee' TER' e DR ! 500 uw 1400 Lav rt oa r COAr-. POG- h1LS 10 luggoveD PACKS 6 A AE15PA DTA IFS -M`176:5 ♦ • moo L.)Fr ice r O °I Q40°- *f �K Cel R • • �woL.. fl uae �O030s, a' P P- Si6tzy S •Tt: • ® OOp LIAItT 0- daJpO F °s PAI; i 11GTc21A1 W16Ht • • ({X�4iJ1{ WTuRr JO00(la� (p PA9r, VAL6BY Pt`QK `� a5T sr -100°s mex_ ffwy 110 G20Sal N (yam C.2:rs+utl; �LhNDS� RIs,# wp o0 f ! 'R»D Z -p. • • VITtat (yp4Q°` MK C r,J4TanJ • Vrrr� 15000 AMI i 1 1 l ... ...:.'�'='y„•.�'y'"fi ". ;.+Ys �!y.....,^,�'.',: `"i!., ?"at. ,, • _ : -_,... y •.i .._a ATHLETIC FIELDS IMPROVEMENTS SITE . MARIE/DELAWARE (Sibley) MONDAKOz8. ESTATES - CENTEX (Future Park Dedication) LAND SIZE 10'5 Acres (Donated by ISD #197/ 19'5 Acres Total (10,5 to be acquired) 22.5 Acres (8.5-NortK Site 14- South Site) FACILITIES 2 Softball, 1 Baseball, 1 Soccer 1 Playground*, 1 Comfort Station/ Concession ` 4 Softball, 1 Neighborhood Softball*, Play- ground*, Comfort Station, Parking 2 Softball, 2 Soccer, 1 Play - ground*, l Comfort Station, Parking 7Y]T8/, Bx/J.rzCLn COSTS $319,000 $940,000 $360,000 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK AMENITIES* $ 36,000 . • $ 53,000 $ 36,000 FINAL ESTIMATE COST ¢355,000 $993,000 $396,000 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS SIBLEY PARK CONSTRUCTION March 14, 1989 Item Quan. Unit Description Unit Pric 1. 40,000 CY Common Excavation. @ $ 2.0 2. 5 Acre Topsoil, Seed, Fertilizer, Mulch @ $ 2,000.0 3, 2 Each Softball Field (No Sod) @ $24,000.0 4. 1 Each Soccer (Large,No Sod) @ $ 4,000.0 5, 1 Each Baseball Field. @ $37,000.0 6. 1 Each Comfort Station. @ $50,000.0 7. 1 Each Storm Sewer. @ $ 5,000.0 8, 4 Each Irrigate Field. @ $ 6,000.0 9. 4 Each Bleachers. @ $_21000-C 10. SIBLEY BALLFIELD CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 266,C 11. CONTINGENCIES AND ENGINEERING (20%) $ 53, 12. SIBLEY BALLFIELD CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 319, NEIGHBORHOOD PARK AMENITIES 13. 1 Each Playground (Small) @ $20,000.( 14, 1 LS Landscaping. @ $10,000.( 15. SIBLEY AMENITIES SUBTOTAL $ 30,E 16. CONTINGENCIES AND ENGINEERING (20%) $ 6 17. SIBLEY NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITIES TOTAL $ 36 18. TOTAL COST (Item 12 & 17) $ 355 *Park Trails budgeted under Trail System Proposal. 2 Amount $ 80,000:00 $ 10,000.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 36,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 8,000.00 0.00 09 we )00.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 10,000.00_ )0.00 )00.00 300.00 300.00 r� J •y 2 r� 1 r 4 •1 :�! i l r r� ��.,• r(y; ili�i}+ryl!! r � i`.r•i"' y p• r I+' i I Lt t'l,rtir��.�•r � iY !/i�:�� ya!�t�;�i;t(r•wrxt.•i; f: 9 r q ��i�,�/t• �1�1��}j(� �ii.�.�yySSr^..� `��(({rJy�'•.r1 �i'r'•y��•i�••rl • ��.C,a.�; /(•1Yr: .li'�.�I�y�9;:V •/•�;Ir c � �1J y: �y(r j•+�+r r� �. i---...,,�,,,` i',f c`p4"F ��f M �1 • i; �t 11•iy;j '+F ._ .,_—,�,�—• r,_ rli�f:'fri� �lYtd lrf� J' y�r' 1f} �I �rtti li 1 7 . gszr b Ict i 40 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MENDAKOTA ESTATES PARK CONSTRUCTION March 14, 1989 Item Quan. Unit Description Unit Price Amount 1. 22,000 CY Common Excavation. @ $ 2.00 $ 44,000.00 2. 10 Acre Topsoil, Seed, Fertilizer, Mulch @ $ 2,000-00 $ 20,000.00 3. 4 Each Softball Field (No Sod) @ $24,000-00 $ 96,000.00 4. 120 Each Parking Stalls. @ $ 300.00 $ 36,000.00 5. 1 Each Comfort Station. @ $50 000.00 $ 50,000.00 6. 1 Each Storm Sewer. @ $ 3,000-00 $ 3,000.00 7. 4 Each Irrigate Field. @ $ 6 000.00 $ 24,000.00 8. 4 Each Bleachers. @ $ 2,000.00_ $ 8,000.00 9. MENDAKOTA ESTATES BALLFIELD CONSTRUCTION SUB -TOTAL $ 281,0)0.00 10. CONTINGENCIES AND ENGINEERING (20%) $ 56,030-00 11. MENDAKOTA ESTATES BALLFIELD CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 337,0 0.00 12. LAND ACQUISITION $ 473 00.00 13• WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION $ 30 00.00 14. CURRENT ASSESSMENTS DUE $ 100 00.00 15• TOTAL BALLFIELD COSTS $ 940 00.00 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK AMENITIES 16. 3,000 CY Common Excavation. @ $ 2.0 $ 6,000.00 17. 2 Acre Topsoil etc. @ $ 2,000. $ 4,000.00 18. 1 Each Playground. @ $20,000.01) $ 20,000.00 19. 1 LS Landscaping. @ $10,000.0) $ 10,000.00 20. 1 Each Neighborhood Softball. @ $ 000.0 $ 4,000.00 21. MENDAKOTA ESTATES AMENITIES SUB -TOTAL $ 44,200-00 22. CONTINGENCIES AND ENGINEERING (20%) $ 9,)00.00 23. MENDAKOTA ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITIES TOTAL $ 53 00.00 24. TOTAL COST (Item 15 & 23) $ 993,300-00 * Park Trails budgeted under trails system proposal 31 0/0 416. 0 • FIRE -14ALL 00 YI 00, Zz NORTH ERN . -U-STATES POWER - if SUB -STATION • In *Parks Trails budgeted under trails system proposal Kj CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS CENTEX PARK CONSTRUCTION March 14, 1989 Item Quan. Unit Description Unit Price Amount 1. 759000 CY Common Excavation. @ $ 2.0 $150,000.00 2. 10 Acre Topsoil, Seed, Fertilizer, Mulch @ $ 2,000-00 $ 20,000.00 3, 2 Each Softball Field (Backstop & Infield) @ $ 7,000.0 $_L4,000-00 4. 2 Each Soccer (Medium, No Sod) @ $ 2,000.0) $ 4,000.00 5. 120 Each Parking Stalls. @ $ 300.0 $ 36,000.00 6. 1 Each Storm Sewer. @ $1.0-1-00-0-0) $ 10,000.00 7. 4 Each Irrigate Field. @ $ 6,000-0) $ 24,000.00 8. CENTEX BALLFIELD CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 258.0)0.00 9. CONTINGENCIES AND ENGINEERING (20%) $ 52 00.00 10. CENTEX BALLFIELD CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 310 00.00 11. FUTURE ASSESSMENTS $ 50 00.00 12. TOTAL BALLFIELD COSTS $ 360,300-00 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK AMENITIES 13. 1 Each Playground. @ $20,000.Q $ 20,000.00 14. 1 LS Landscaping. @ $10,000. 0 $ 10,000.00 15. CENTEX AMENITIES SUBTOTAL $ 30 00.00 16. CONTINGENCIES AND ENGINEERING (20%) $ 6,000.00 17. CENTEX NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITIES TOTAL $ 36 000.00 18. TOTAL COST (Item 12 & 17) $ 396"000.00 *Parks Trails budgeted under trails system proposal Kj w -,R)*4tL-2 I I -- 'a.inpij I K - Lu F 4 �l MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS March 21,' To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevin F�V7-_y Administrator Re: Citizen's Parks Review Committee Recommendation With the Friday packet of materials, Council received t tentative recommendation of the Citizen's Parks Review Committee for pursuing a parks development program and referendum. The Committee met last evening, Monday, Ma 20th to finalize it's adoption of a recommendation. The Committee voted to recommend to the City Council t City pursue development of the trails system, neighbor parks improvements, and ballfields as outlined in the committee materials. The Committee did recommend that amount of the referendum be kept at no more than $2.5 million; this can be accomplished by reducing the contingencies line item, and paying for the $150,000 - $180,000 of special assessment with monies other than bond proceeds. The Committee acknowledged that there are several unkno, its proposal, including an agreement with School Distri for development of the Sibley site, the cost of land at Mendakota site, and City approval of development plans will result in dedication of the Centex site. However, Committee is recommending that, at this point, the Coun proceed with working toward a solution to those issues. The Committee intends to meet again in mid-April to rev progress on these fronts. It hopes to be prepared for May 2nd Council meeting with a recommendation regarding exact plan, amount, and date for a referendum (the refe date tentatively discussed is Tuesday, June 20th). Cha Jann Blesener has suggested that a couple of public ope houses be planned for the week of April 10th, so that citizen's have an early opportunity to review the propo and give their input before a final program is adopted referendum vote. Council has previously received a letter of endorsement Councilmember Buzz Cummins, and a resolution of support the Parks and Recreation Commission. Attached you will a letter from Committee member Mike Kluznick, who was ui to attend last night's meeting. Also attached, Council 1989 t the od he e ns in t 197 the hat the it ew he an endum r al or a from f rom find able will find a revised memo concerning thoughts on a potential agreement with District 197. The Committee recommendation will be orally presented by: Ballfields and Overall Plan - Jann Blesener Neighborhood Parks - Kevin Frazell Trails - John Huber ACTION REQUIRED If following the presentation, Council wishes to proceed with this plan, it is recommended that two actions be taken: 1. Pass a motion accepting the recommendation of the Citizen's Parks Review Committee, and directing City staff and the Committee to work toward a final recommendation for the Council meeting of May 2, 1989. 2. Pass a motion appointing a committee of City staff and Council representatives to meet with School District 197 and the owners of the Mendakota property to pursue acquisition and/or development plans for those parts of the ballfields plan. NEIGHBORHOOD PARKSk 1. Friendlv Hills Park Regrading and Reseeding Playfield 3,450 Landscape Parking Area 5,000 Half Court Basketball 5,175* Play Structure 20,000 2. Friendly Marsh Park Wildlife Viewing Blind Elevated Platform Interpretive Signing Minimal Parking 3. Ivy Hills Park Half Court Basketball Additional Parking Additional Landscaping Play Structure additions Parking (asphalt only) Reseeding 4. Marie Park Half Court Basketball Railroad Ties in Outfield Play Structure Parking (asphalt only) 5. Rogers Lake Park Half Court Basketball Volleyball". Horseshoe Canoe Launch Replace Play Structure Landscape Entrance (continued on next page) 2,070 3,795 4,600 4,600 5,175 5,750 5,750 5,000 6,000 1,000 5,175* 500 20,000 6,000 5,175 1,725 1,150 5,175 20,000 5,000 $13,625 $15,065 28,675 $� 1, 675 8,225 I 6. Vallev Park Replace Play Structure 20,000 Half Court Basketball 5,175 Parking (asphalt only) 6,000 Improved Drainage - Softball field 4,600 7. Wentworth Park Clean up landscaping 3,000 Half Court Basketball 5,175 Parking (asphalt only) 10,000 Play Equipment 20,000 8. Curley Tot -lot Enhancements SUB -TOTAL 20% contingency TOTAL 15, 775 $18,175 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 23,215 $ 4,643 $ 2 7,,858 * The 1986 dollar figures from the Barton - Aschman have had a 15% inflation factor applied to them. sals NEW PARRS 1. Sibley Play Equipment Landscaping 2. Mendakota Play Equipment Common Excavation Topsoil Neighborhood Softball Landscaping 3. Centex Play Equipment Landscaping Picnic Shelter 4. Haastrom-Rin Bench, Trash Receptacle, Bike Rack, Sign Landscaping* 5. Victoria -Highlands Grading Bench, Bike Rack, Trash Rec. Half Court Basketball Parking Play Structure Sign Landscaping Seeding SUB -TOTAL 20% Contingency TOTAL 20,000 ✓ 10,000 20,000 ✓ 6,000 4,000 4,000 10,000 20, 000 10,000 22,000 4,800 10,000 5,000* 3,800 5,175 6,000 20, 000✓ 1,000 10,000 10,000 $30,0 $44,0 $52,00( $14,801 $60,97 $ 201,77 $ 242,13 * Engineering staff estimate of remaining grading CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO ✓ March 7, 1989 TO: Citizens Parks Review Committee FROM: Kevin D. Frazell, City Administrator ,SUBJECT: Potential Agreement Between the City and Schoo: District 197 for Henry Sibley Athletic Field Development A small subcommittee of the larger Ballfields Subcommittee has previously met to outline potential parameters for anagreement between the City and School District 197 for development and operation of athletic facilities at the Henry Sibley campus. The thoughts of "Subcommittee of the Subcommittee" are as follows: 1. Facilities needed at the site is Two softball fields, one baseball field, one soccer field, playground equipment, one comfort station with rest rooms, concessions, and storage. All fields will have bleachers and player benches; there will be a backstop, dugout, and goal fencing included. Lighting of fields will be reserve for the future. 2. How should the facility be controlled and managed? We would be in favor of creating a recreation board, as allowed by Minnesota Statutes. The board membership would be comprised of two city council members, two school board members, an three citizens from the community (one representing Mend -Eagan, one representing you h athletics, and one at -large Mendota Heights resident with children enrolled in School District 197). 3. What hours of priority would the City need in t} e facility? School District 197 would have priority until 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday during the s year, and until 1:00 p.m. during the summer s activities. All other times would be priorit the City of Mendota Heights. ool ool for 4. 5. How should the land and facilities be owned? As joint tenants in common, with each party having a 50 percent ownership of the land and all improvements. This roughly parallels the relative contributions of the School District in terms of land, and the City in terms of facilities. Who does maintenance and under what terms? This issue would not be addressed explicitly in the joint agreement between the City and the School District. It would rather be left to the recreation board for study and request of fu ding to the City'Council and the School Board. 6. Parking Facilities - How much do We need and w nt? Priority for 100 parking spaces at all times during which the City has priority use of the facilities (see number three above). 7. How will disputes between the City -and Distric be resolved? First by the recreation board, second by submittal to an arbitration panel. 8. How are ongoing financial obligations of the t parties set? The recreation board (see number two above) would be responsible for developing and recommends g a maintenance budget. School District 197 and the City of Mendota Heights would each contribute half of those maintenance costs. If either entity did not agree to pay its share, it wo ld be up to the recreation board to come up witt an alternative budget. The recreation board wo ld also be responsible for maintaining a five year capital improvements plan for the facility, and a program for funding those improvements. 9. Consumption of Alcohol Alcohol consumption could be totally banned the site. 10. How long should the agreement last? Ninety-nine years, automatically renewed unles cancelled by either party. t 11. Dissolution of the agreement. Dissolution should be only by joint agreement both parties. We added also a.provision that use of the storage facilities in the comfort station should be for City use only. As the full Citizen's Parks Review Committee will need to make a recommendation to the City Council on this matter, a discussion of the parameters for an agreement will be part of our agenda for the March 20th meeting. ANALYSIS OF PARKS BOND REFERENDUM TAX IMPLICATIONS The following chart attempts to show the tax impact on homes of various value, beginning with taxes payable in 1991. It is assumed that a referendum of $2.5 million is passed which results in annual debt payments of $265,000 for 20 years. It is further assumed that the City incurs an additional expense of $100,000 for maintenance and operati.ons of the new facilities. The last column shows the additional tax impact of e $100,000 that is added to the referendum amount. DISCLAIMER - The new property tax law is extremely complex, and subject to change by the 1989 and subsequent legislatures. The following is staff's best guesstimate f impact based on the law currently in place. ASSESSOR'S MARKET ANNUAL TAX COST OF EAC VALUE IMPACT ADD. $100,0 0 $ 90,000 $ 33 $ 1 125,000 62 2 200,000 129 4 250,000 173 6 350,000 262 8 1989 TAX RATES We have recently received from the County Auditor a brea of City taxes for the year 1989. Because of the new law which is based on tax capacity, a comparison of the old rates is no longer valid. The Auditor has computed some comparisons for the County and City, while we have tried make similar comparisons for the School and Metro levies The following are the results of these comparisons: % of Tax Capacity 1989 County 20.72 City 13.29 School 36.19 Metro 3.65 73.86 % of Est. Tax Capacit 1988 19.67 13.61 42.87 _ 3.62 79.77 For purposes of comparison, the following are the local capacity rates of our neighbors: 11 to .ax For the S.D. 197 residents, the 89 rate is a bit of an aberration with the levy increase expired, and the new r to not effective, the District % dropped from an estimated 42.8% of capacity to 36.2%. Next year with the recent levy increase factored in, we would anticipate the school % t increase to around 45%. Direct comparisons are not too valid anymore, with the variety of assessments. However, in general, the tax lo< has been shifted from higher value to lower value (up to $120,000) homes. The board of review meeting scheduled J April should provide some enlightenment as to the future course of the levies. ACTION• None - Information only. or City % Total West St. Paul 16.55 77.53 Eagan 197 16.27 76.64 Eagan 196 16.27 93.99 IGH 199 16.51 77.45 1987 1988 -ASSESSORS 1988 % ASSESSORS MARKET NET CITY VALUE MARKET 1989 CITY % VALUE TAR TAR INCREASE VALUE TAX TAX INCREASE 88,000 1002 17.6 102 97,b00 I048 I88 +5Z 125,'000 1927 337'• 5% 132,000 1880 353 -2R 1 150,000 2551 446 5% •157,*500 2489 481 -2% 200,000 3800 665 0 200,000 3536' 664 -7% 11 to .ax For the S.D. 197 residents, the 89 rate is a bit of an aberration with the levy increase expired, and the new r to not effective, the District % dropped from an estimated 42.8% of capacity to 36.2%. Next year with the recent levy increase factored in, we would anticipate the school % t increase to around 45%. Direct comparisons are not too valid anymore, with the variety of assessments. However, in general, the tax lo< has been shifted from higher value to lower value (up to $120,000) homes. The board of review meeting scheduled J April should provide some enlightenment as to the future course of the levies. ACTION• None - Information only. or f r CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS r' MEMO 4 J�' • o� t TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM]KEVIN D. F ,�TY ADMINISTRATOR :a i SUBJECT: Location and Design Approval for U.S. West Essential Service Structure/Park Building f DATE:, March 16, 1989 At the meeting of March 7, Council gave conditional use permit approval for construction of the U.S. West Fiber Optic/Recreation Building in the upcoming Centex Park. A: additional copy of the materials from that meeting are attached for your review. Council's action to approve th, conditional use permit was subject to review by the Parks Recreation Commission for a recommendation on the locatio: and design of the building. The Parks Commission considered the matter at its meeting Wednesday, February 15. The Commission voted in favor of building with park equipment storage room and finished bathrooms, essentially Option 1 offered by U.S. West (see memo of March 3 authored by Jim Danielson). Such a build. would not have a sheltered picnic area, but only a small shelter overhang in front of the bathroom entrance. The Commission also voted to endorse location of the buil at the eastern end of the parking lot, which is labeled a Alternative 2 in the attached site plan. Because time is the essence for U.S. West to get on with this,project, th eastern site is really the only viable one. The other tw alternatives, south or west of the parking lot, would req substantial fill that cannot be completed at this time. making this recommendation, the Commission also recommend that when the park is laid out, a 60 slot parking lot wit double entrance be provided for ease of circulation and adequacy of parking. Sincel.the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting was not held until Wednesday evening (because of Tuesday's storm) U.S. West has not had time to prepare the elevations and site plans in time for sending out with the Agenda packet However, they will have them available at the Council mee Tuesday evening. �t �L r and of a .ng MR ew .ing Page Two i. ACTION REQUIRED f Motion to approve the design, location, and a building for construction on the U.S. West essential service structure/park recreation building. f � i' KDF : j ak Attachment , , t W I i i t nit i 4 { t CITY OF MENDOTA IfEIGHTS MEMO March 3, 1989 A Y TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator r FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: U.S. West Utility Building Location 3 • ti DISCUSSION: Council recently turned down an application from U.S. West to locate a utility building near a pond along Mendota heights Road. Council did not want to obstruct the view of this pond from Mendota !Heights Road. The building was*to house'some "state of.the art" fiber optics telephone equip- ment and provide that service to the new residents in the Southea t area. ` The Minneapolis/St, Paul area was selected by U.S. West over seve al others as a test case and local U.S. West employees are extremely anxiou3 not to have this opportunity fall through and go to another state. In order to help with a solution Council offered to allow th3 building to be placed within the Centex Park area. U.S. West therefore met and worked out a location with Centex and then met with staff and flow rd ,Dahlgren to discuss that location (see attached map). As a resul of the meeting with Howard Dahlgren the location was changed from that s►own on tfie map to be either east or west of the parking lot near some existirig trees. Also at the meeting with Howard several building designs were di= ussed and U.S. West has amended their letter of February 22, 1989 (attached) to agree .to consider any one of the following options: 1. Build a park equipment storage room and finished"bathrolcros. 2. Build a park equipment storage room and an attached shelter area (per Howard Dahlgren design) and pay City $20,000 for land ease- ment. 3. Build a park equipment storage room, an unfinished bathroom and an attached shelter area (per Howard Dahlgren design). ACTION REQUIRED: Review request with Ken Dahlman U.S. West's representative Jmine a course of action. de ter- U S WEST Business Resources, Inc. Real Estate Department 100 South 51h Street, Suite 1040 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 [I February 22, 1989 Honorable Mayor Esteemed Council Members City Administrator Park Board Commissioner At the February 7, 1989, City Council meeting, I presented a drawing of a proposed building to be considered for joint use by the City and U S WEST in a park near the Kensington PUD development. I am asking for a meeting with the responsible City officials and the developers to determine a joint use plan whicl is feasible and attainable within our timing parameters. The building would be constructed on the park land, entirely with U S WEST funds. We would erect the building to our equipment specifications and fini i the rest room/storage room facilities to the City s specifications. We have estimated that the cost f the City improvements would be about $23,400. We believe this would be a fair trade -*off for the land acquisition costs. We could also work with the p rk board to design the building to include a covered picnic area' if the City chooses to include one, at its expense. U S WEST proposes to lease the land from the City own the building, but in turn, lease thestorage/rest room area to the City. The city would maintain the exterior of the structure and it's leased area. J S WEST would maintain the interior of the equipment area, it's access door, and the roof.- We would rftain the right to enter the City's premises if necessa:y to maintain the water tight integrity of our premise.-. For example, the City would be responsible for tha care and repair to the restrooms; however, if a waterline broke, we could enter the restrooms to secure the water line to prevent water damage to Dur equipment. It is our desire to have the new telephone servic available to the developers model home at it's scheduled opening in August. !2 a February 22, 1989 Letter to City of Mendota Heights Page 2 We, therefore, ask for a meeting of the parties, at their earliest convenience, to discuss the issues and reach an agreement on the building design and' placement within the proposed park area so that we can proceed with formal City approval of a conditional use permit'for this plan. Si er' Kenneth L. Dallman Assistant Manager -Real Estate cc: Kevin Clark Dick Putnam 2 T- rl (moi i'i+i` -77- EST -COMMUNICATIONS. Us—w tho AOKINS ASSOCLAMN bW- +74067-- ti �m • ._' .,•+.,itis., it.i;.44 �,t,r/ ''. ,,i •..,, 14,r �}SIF, ;,%{t;{Y'.,.a•' y?�'� w1V ' ". ' �� i:,4, _,�%; y��5•;�riUYf�;�� ;•fit r��; �,/1: '. ',''. ' '. •�;., 'I;ri��;'Jt;'t:,Fray* �+,t;l.{ .'' +' • �.}',' ; i,.,��:l:r. Y•].'.r. �',If'I,',y'�,�•I�.li11A4i�1� IA. ��,,.,WW 1' t,, -•i-�i,t A14 r%t t*14 • t ., �_ , :t�'l y h�'f '.S•' i ,t,, j•', 4 Y,t .1'1.1.,, yli ...tl++• �•i �1 �, ��'•` k\uk ,....,.. Irl ' . i ;• hAT1Sic r `ti +�{�S:•�►' S;`•'•,+',;;%-r'r' ( ,,y4J•+ 1 �' hlit �ti• i� It ( ��- �i''+. V5 • J .. • �'t cY31n (rr� t� 0..bD UP -- ;. k- -^i7l- 1i 9-- X0 4. 411 mIN ��, Vo �'►T11'�\ �� v\ , :tet''-�-'''� ij �i I �'C" � �: . r � �':-•.��'- IN KT ' •�� , i �-�/� j '-:ctl-wr-"=r,. /�,• \ ..jam J \ % •� ✓.ir. K��T i � tit .°. -.; .\ •1 (� .f , '\'\Y _ �• � �:.t� Ilk1 _ �+ l.yi:�l-,,T_•sT:=�`rj:.i;}:;ls�.. _..' , � r.t�'!r�•a � � \\ •\� � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 15, 1 TO: Mayor, City Council and City AV rator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets Val's Addition Job No. 8815 Improvement No. 88, Project No. 4 nT Q n7TQ Q TnN . 4 Val's Addition is a 10 lot subdivision located north of Orcha d Place. Staff has completed the plans and specifications to serve the subdivision, the plans are attached and the specifications will be available Tuesday evening. While preparing these plans staff was reminded that therE is a drainage problem on Orchard Place, we therefore have included a solution to that problem with this project. The cost for this extra storm sewer is estimated to be $10,000 and we propose to fund that extra cost out the contingencies for the original Orchard Place project, completed in 1974 (Improvement No. 74, Project No. 2). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the plans and specifications be approveq and that staff be authorized to advertise for bids with the bid opening on April 3, 1989. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with the staff recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 89-_, RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL ILANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BID FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE VAL'S ADDITION AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. 4) 1 i 7 t rt. s 2 a City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89- RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE VAL'S ADDITION AND ADJACENT,AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. 4) WHEREAS, the City Engineer reported that the proposed improvements ind construction thereof were feasible and desirable and further report d, on the proposed costs of said improvements and construction thereof; and t 1 WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore directed that the City Eng' neer proceed with the preparation of plans and specifications there f; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications fo said improvements and has presented such plans and specifications t the City Council for approval. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the Cit of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the plans and specifications for said improvements be and they are hereby in all respects approved. 2. That the City Clerk with the aid and assistance of the Cit Engineer be and is hereby authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said improvements all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes, such bids to be received at the City Hall of the City of Mendota Heights by 10:00 o'clock A.M., Monday, April 3, 1989, at which time they will be publicly opened at the Cit Hall by the City Engineer will then be tabulated, and will thell be considered by the City Council at its next regular Council meeting. Adopted by the City Council of the City of MendotaHeights this 21st day of March, 1989• Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS BY, Charles E. Mertensotto, or MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEVINL, CITY ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: Trunk Highway 55 Area Property Acquisitions DATE: March 14, 1989 The purpose of this memo is twofold. First, to have Coui pass a resolution adopting relocation rules as required l State law. Second, is to approve the purchase documents the Galen Funk property, and to consider a second purcha! request in the Furlong neighborhood. RESOLUTIONS ADOPTING POLICY Council will recall that, by state law, we are required adopt a set of relocation rules and guidelines prior to acquisition of real property by our tax increment distri Those rules and regulations are as promulgated by the U. Department of Transportation (by reference in Minnesota statute), and were the subject of a presentation by Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder at your meetir. February 7, 1989. Included at the February 7 meeting was the required pub hearing. Also, the required 30 day public comment was provided through Thursday, March 9, 1989. The City off have received no written or verbal comments or requests concerning the relocation rules. Therefore, we can pro with the adoption. The attached resolution adopts the required rules and guidelines concerning relocation. As you can see, adop of these rules would apply to all real property acquisi in our tax increment district, be it along Highway 55, somewhere else in the district (i.e. the 110/Lexington Commercial Redevelopment Project). ACQUISITION OF PARTICULAR PARCELS it for 0 t. of c es on ons The next attachments are the necessary agreements to excute the purchase of the property owned by Galen and Judy Fu k at 1199 Rogers Road. Those documents include: s Page Two 1. Standard Purchase Agreement, including addendum and exhibit concerning six month house lease. 2. Waiver of Relocation Benefits As Council can see, the Funks have executed the document and they are now ready for execution by City officials, that we can proceed with the transaction. 1 The final attachment to this memorandum is a letter from Ms. Eileen Fournier, 1306 Kendon Lane, requesting that t City pursue the purchase of her property. During the February 7 discussion, Council indicated its willingness purchase properties in the Furlong area. ' ACTION REQUIRED If Council wishes to continue with the Highway 55 area property acquisitions, it should take the following act 1. Adopt Resolution 89- , Resolution Adopting Relocati Rules and Guidelines for City of Mendota Heights Development District No. 1 and Tax Increment Financi for Redevelopment District. 2. Authorize the Mayor, City Administrator and City Cl execute the Standard Purchase Agreement with Addend and Relocation Benefits with Galen R. and Judith Fu purchase of property at 1199 Rogers Road. 3.` Pass a motion ordering an appraisal of the property by Eileen Fournier at 1306 Kendon Lane. KDF:jak Attachments 0 to to for hi ".UAUDA iy L°. STANDARD YELL WBuyer's Copy Minneapolis, MN Do NOT COPY GREE -Seller's Copy Subject to Copyright Laws PURCHASE AGREEMENT PINK- uyer's Receipt ' ` 1. Galen R. and Judith Funk , Minnesota , 19 2. RECEIVED OF City of Mendota Heights the sum of Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars (s 500.00 ) by vcheck'�. NOT® s : • :011�h) as earnest money to be deposited the next business day after acceptance in trust account of listing broker 5. (unless otherwise specified in writing) and in part payment for the purchase of the premises legally described as 6. See attached Exhibit A. 7. 8. located at (Street Address) 1199 Rogers Road , 9. City of Mendota Heights , County of Dakota , State of Minnesota, 10. including all plants, shrubs and trees, all storm windows and/or inserts, storm doors, screens, awnings, window hades, blinds, curtain - 11. traverse -drapery rods, attached lighting fixtureswith bulbs, plumbing fixtures, water heater, heating system, humidifier, central air conditioning, 12. electronic air filter, automatic garage door opener with controls, water softener, cable television outlets and cabling, BUILT-INS to include: 13. dishwasher, garbage disposal, trash compactor, oven(s), cooktop stove, microwave oven, hood -fan, intercom, inst Iled carpeting, IF ANY, 14. located on the premises which are the property of Seller and also the following personal property: 15. 16. 17. all of which property Seller has this day sold to Buyer for the sum of: $ 96, 000.00 18. Ninety-six Thousand and 00/100 Dollars, 19. 20. which Buyer agrees to pay in the following manner: Earnest money of $ 500.00 an 21, g 95, 500.00 cash on or before the date of c losing. aakkmmk=gc 22. Off if7i 4�fiidlRi�i41EX 23. 24, WAIVER: Sellers' Waiver of Relocation Benefits was signed at the same time as and executed 25. herewith as a condition precedent to this Agreement to purchase the premises. Sellers under - 26. stand and acknowledge that Buyer would not enter this Agreement except in rel ance on Sellers' Waiver of Relocation Benefits. 29. 30. i9 31. Attached 4k I addendumi which a[as made a part of this agreement. General 32. SUBJECT TO performance by Buyer, Seller agrees to execute and deliver a Warranty Deed, ADDENDUM TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT DATED , 19 Pertaining to the Sale of Real Estate 1199 Rogers Road 1. CONTINUED OCCUPANCY. The parties agree that from and after t e date of closing, Seller may continue to occupy the premises located at 1199 Rogers Road for up to six (6) months without payment of rent. During such period, Seller agrees to pay all utilities and maintain premises in a habitable condition. Sellers all insure the premises during Seller's occupancy from and after the closing date anc designate the City of Mendota Heights as the loss payee. Seller agrees to give t le City of Mendota Heights thirty (30) days advance notice prior to vacating the property. At closing, Buyer and Seller shall enter into a House Lease in the form a tached as Exhibit B. 2. REAL ESTATE TAXES. Real estate taxes due in the year of closin prorated as of the date of closing; provided, however, that Sellers shall pa at closing all real estate taxes allocable to Seller's 6 -month period of occupancy of the premises, as described above. In addition, Sellers sl- closing all levied special assessments relating to the subject property. otherwise set forth above, Buyer shall pay all real estate taxes due sub closing. Sellers shall pay all real estate taxes due in years prior to tl closing. BUYER: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By: Its: SELLERS: GALEN R. FUNK JUDITH FUNK shall be to Buyer continued all pay at Except as sequent to ie year of 'j) *EXHIBIT B Form Nio. 1 533 t 1{.•v. vi mi Mill r/I)nvin Co.. Minnirapolift HOUSE LEASE This is a lease. It is a legal agreement between the Tenant and the LANDLORD to rent the House described below. The word I.Aindlord as used in this Lease means City of Mendota 1-leights nd the Landlord's address is The word TENANT as used in this Lease means (List all persons who will live in the House). This Lease is a legal contract that can be enforced in court against the Landlord or the Tena t if either one of them does not comply with this Lease. 1. Description of House. The.address of the House is 1199 Rogers Road, Mendota The House is located on property legally described as: see Exhibit A 2. Term of Lease. This Lease is for a term of beginning on ,19—, at o'clock, m. and endingxxx Xkx-x-xntxxxxxxx%'x1 1wxxxxxx. calendar months after the commencement date. 3. Rent. , a. Amount. The rent for the House is None Mikasx$ purX)W101h4Fj d)iXxa¢.kvs=M- 1, P-awnierit..-T-h"ent-payinentfor-each-month must be paid before4h _ ;"Landlord does day of each month beginning on , 19____ at Lan_dloi:d's addres not have to give notice to Tenant to pay the rent. Tenant.understahils that Landlord will not accept a partial payment of rent. �Ivery c. Respon " ity-for Rent. Tenant listed above is individually responsible for paying the 1= 1 ou t"f-rent-owed-ta-L--andlurd. 4. Security Deposit. The Tenant has given the Landlord ment of money that is a security deposit. If'Tenant fails to perform any term in this Lease, Landlord may use the security deposit for pa Landlord may spend ordamnges that landlord suffers because ofTenant's failure.The Landlord may use thesecurityc lamage tothe I louse caused bv theTenant or theTenant's guests. The security deposit may also be used to pay any rent o the Landlord at the end of the l.euse. The Landlord will pay the Tenant interest on the security deposit at the rate of rive and one-half percent (5-1 /2%) pe Minnesota Statutes Section 504.20, sulyd. 1. Landlord shall, within three weeks after (1) the end of the Lease term, and ( eposit to pay for any hat the Tenant owes year, as required by ) receipt of Tenant's nailing address or delivery instructions, return thedepositto theTenant, togetherwith the interest due on thedeposit. If t 'eturn thedepositwithin the threeweeks, Landlord mustgiveTenanta written statement showing the specific reason fo heLandlorddoesnot r withholding of part )r all of the depnsit.'I'he Landlord may keel) all or part of the security deposit (1) for rent or other money owed to the lamnge to the House beyond ordinary wear and tear. andlord, and (2) for 5. Quiet Enjoyment. If Tenant pays the rent and complies with all other terns of this Lease, Tenant, may use the House for the term of .his Lease. 6. Usc of House. The House must be used only as a private hopse to live in and for no other purpose. The Tenant nay or any unlawful activity. 'The Tenant may not use the House for the purpose of carrying on any business, professionor not use the House trade. 7. Maintenance and Repair. See Addendum 4.fer-uUb-cl Les! 2)•-hr-keep-thri•I during the term of the lease, except when the damage was caused by the intentional or negligent action of.th 'n-reanmibta"pai.w e Teharit or Tenant's guests; and (3) to maintain the House in compliance with the applicable health and safety laws except where t by the Tenant or'Tenant's guests. b. By Tenant. Tenant promises, at`I'enant's expense t I,;Lr ill repairs and eliminate any violation of health ie violation is caused and safety laws that result from the negligen t, willful, maliue-oriresbleconductoftheTenantortheTenant'sfamily, agent ' shall comply with all the . aws affecting the cleanliness, occupancy and preservation of the Hot or guest. Tenant se, except where the Iandlord is c iy law to comply with the sanitary laws (See Minnesota Statute, Section 504.18). Tenant agrees to perform the ng re mir rind rnnintrrrrme- 8. Alterations. Tenant mustobtain Landlord's prior written consent to install any panelling, flooring, partitions or o paint or wallpaper the I louse. Tenant must not change the heating, electrical, plumbing, ventilation or air conditior make alterations or ing without the prior vritlen consent of the Landlord. M 9. Damage to House. If the House is destroyed or damaged not due to the fault of Tenant or Tenant's guests, and the (louse is unfit for ise as a residence, Tenant is not required to pay rent for the time the House cannot be used. If part of the house cannot mly pay rent for the usable part. If the i louse is damaged or destroyed, Landlord may terminate this Lease immediately a used, Tenant must nd may decide not to ebuild or repair the house. If the damage was not caused by the Tenant or the Tenant's guest and the Landlord canc hall be pro rated up to the time of the damage. Is the Lease, the rent lo. Utilities. Tenant shall tray for all utilities provided to the House,r'GUjNXXi3C rH�ifiXIY}1)t11i, in�wHuttG71 tltiuikluxtt�Al4�sXX{)i9p1:IX'Tcnant shall not w:istc any utilities provided by lauwdlord. i I. Right of Entry. Landlord and Landlord's agents may enter the House at reasonable luturs to repair or ins, perform any work that Landlord decides is necessary. In addition, the Landlord may show the House to possible or new'k, hours during the last Sixty ((In) days of the lease terms. PI 12. Assignment and Subletting. Tenant may not assign this Lease, lease the House to anyone else (sublet), sell i any other person to use the House without the prior written consent of the Landlord. If Tenant does, Iandlord may tern esrrihed in Paragraph lG of this i.ease. Any assignment or sublease made without Landlord's written consent will not' just get landlord's permission each time Tenant wants to assign or sublet. Landlord's permission is good only for that sp sublease. }before theend of the six-month lease 13. Termination. irrenanI,wants to move outor the i-lousehttlwLkiKtemXoTxx^oAxTenant must give Landlord pt least thirty (30)days before thelltsh�tXt9[Db}6]4CI9CtbcOCl�i?axi�D4lijltsC0ait1{D�1tH?t6C4CfA'7fSiY?frJCjR4{4EJcg4CfttX1X9FD67CFt? date Tenant is to move out .tihis rcnuu;�L{�r�wueui ale:ill bw ualid wnly if-l,andlercl, has µiven tet=l enanl written natiFe, serveei perFenally or_-Iiy regisl Tenant's attention to this renewal provision Lytdl„r.t +,iust,give-this noticewithin'f1fte`eii-0'5Yilays prior to the time that'] fnmish3iiirtlee,tf� n47nt-s in cur tmmcweout-but not mare than thirty (30) days priorto-titatdate 14. SurrenderofPremises. Tenant shall move out of the House when this Lease ends. When Tenant moves out, T' House in as good condition as it was when the Lease started, with the exception of reasonable wear and tear. lb-Atmndonment. -If-•Tcnant-mover ou"f-the-House-before-the-end-of-this-Lease,—bandlor(i-may-bring-n-lcg possession of the l louse.'I'lie Landlord may rent the House to someone else. Any rent received by Landlord for the re•renli to pay Landlord's expenses for re—renting the I louse and second to pay�mnunte-TenMiCowes under this Lease. Tenan for paying the difference between the amount g rmWwed-byTi�nant under this Lease and the amount of rent received b new tenant together w,-any-cMr cost nd attorney's fees. If Landlord recovers possession of the House after Ten 4 -And n ay consider Tenant's personal property in the House to also have been abandoned. Landlord may then di, ect the House and misty at reasonable rchasers its Lease or permit inate this Lease as e effective. Tenant ci fic assignment or term or written notice tit required to tshall leave the il-action-to -reraver ig shall be used first shall be responsible 1 Landlord from the mt moves out, then )ose of the personal ifi. Default. If Tenant does not pay the rent or other amounts when due or if Tenant violates any term of this 14Dasc, Landlord may term inatethisLcase.lfTenantdoesnot moveout,i.tindlordmay bring anevictionaction. IfTenant violates aterm ofthi. Lease andLandlord does not terminate this Lease orevictTenant, Landlord may still terminate this Lease and evict Tenant for any other vi intion of this Lease. 17. Heirs and Assigns. The terms of this Lease apply to the'Penant and Landlord. The terms of this Lease also apt ly to any heirs, legal representatives and assigns of Tenant or Landlord. J& IUMMCNDOTA HEIGHTS TENANT: By: - Its Manager M> OIi ITN � TA 's, J u' JOUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 19-._ by STATE OF MINNESOTA Jr, COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 19—by the of , a corporation, on behalf of the corporation. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: (Name) Address) en (Signature of Person Taking tle or (Signature of Person or Itank) Q ADDENDUM TO HOUSE LEASE DATED: , 19 Pertaining to Real Estate at 1199 Rogers Road, Mendota Heights, Minnesota 1. Lessees agree to lease the premises in AS IS condition.. 2. Lessees agree that the premises are in reasonable repair and habitable in as of the date of this Agreement. 3. Lessees agree that they have inhabited the premises prior to the initiat lease term and have found the premises fit for their intended use. I respects of the 4. Lessees agree that the premises comply with applicable health and safety laws, ordinances and regulations. 5. Lessees agree, in consideration for Lessor's agreement to waive all base rent during the lease period, to be responsible for any and all repair or maintenance of the property, including, without limitation, the roof, windows, plumbing and plumbing fixtures, electric wiring, furnace and heating systems. 6. • In the event that the leased premises are so injured by the elements or cause as to be untenantable or unfit for occupancy, Lessees or any Occup leased premises agree to quit and surrender possession of the premises im. Lessees acknowledge and agree that their continued occupancy of the subject to the sale of the premises by Lessees to Lessor is solely an accor by Lessor made at the instance and request of Lessees. my other nt of the iediately. premises modation Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES All of Lot Five and all of that part of Lot Six described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner, thence North to the Northeast corner, thence Southwest one hundred twenty-five feet (125% thence Southeast to a point on the South line seventy-five feet (75) Southwest of the point of beginning, thence Northeast seventy-five feet (75') to the point of beginning, Schouveller Subdivision. WAIVER OF RELOCATION BENEFITS THIS CONTRACT made this day of , 1988 by a GALEN R. and JUDITH FUNK, husband and wife, hereinafter "Sellers," and the CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, hereinafter "Buyer;" W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Buyer and Sellers have entered into a Purchase whereby Buyer at Sellers' request has agreed to purchase certai belonging to Sellers, such property being located at 1199 Rol Mendota Heights, Minnesota and legally described as: All of Lot 5 and all that part of Lot 6 described follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner, thence North to th Northeast corner, thence Southwest One Hundred Twenty Five feet (1251), thence Southeast to a point on the Sout line Seventy -Five feet (751) Southwest of the point c beginning, thence Northeast Seventy -Five feet (751) to th point of beginning, Schouveller Subdivision, hereinafter referred to as the "Property." NOW, THEREFORE, 1. Sellers hereby declare that Buyer's purchase of the taking place at the request of the Sellers made prior to any action by the Buyer which would indicate an intent to acquire the Propert prior to any action by the Buyer to purchase the Property, Sellers sell the Property on the public market. id between called the called the Agreement i property ers Road, )perty is hatsoever and that tended to 2. Sellers hereby acknowledge their eligibility for relocation ssistance, services, payments and benefits under Minn. Stat. § 117.52, subd. 1, specifically including: a. either actual reasonable expenses incurred in moving themselves, their family, and personal property, and actual direct losses f tangible personal property as a result of moving, limited to an amount equal to the reasonable expenses that would have been required to relocate such Property; or in lieu thereof, a moving expense allowance. b. An additional payment not in excess of Twenty -T Five Hundred Dollars ($22,500.00) which would include: (i) that amount, if any, which when added to the costs of the dwelling would equal the reasonable cost of a replacement dwelling; and Thousand uisition parable (ii) that amount which would compensate Sellers for any increased interest costs and other debt service costs which Sellers would be required to pay for financing the acquisitiop of a comparable replacement dwelling; and (iii) that amount which would compensate Sellers or the reasonable expenses incidental to the purchase of a replacement dwelling; or, a payment not in excess of Five Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($5,250.00) to rent or apply toward the downpayment on a ccparable replacement dwelling. c. Payment of or reimbursement for those expenses neessarily incurred for evidence of title, recording fees, transfer taxes, a d other closing costs incident to the conveyance of the Property and the purchase of a replacement dwelling, and for penalty costs for prepayment of any pre-existing mortgage. d. Insurance of any mortgage executed or to be executed on a comparable replacement dwelling. e. Relocation advisory services including provision of inj regarding availability, sales prices, and rental charges for ee replacement dwellings; assurances that Sellers will not be req move until they have had reasonable opportunity to reloca comparable replacement dwelling; information on government which may be of assistance to Sellers; and other advisory servic would minimize hardships to Sellers. f. The right to have made available to them one or more cc replacement dwellings specifically including, without limitation, to be informed of the location of such replacement dwelling, the delay relocating for a time sufficient to enable the Sellers to negc enter into a purchase agreement or lease for such replacement and the right to relocation assistance and acquisition payments sufficient to complete the purchase or lease of the replacement dH Seller iparable tired to e to a rograms s which n pa rable fte right right to .iate and [welling, t a time �lling. 3. Sellers hereby acknowledge their eligibility for reimburseent for appraisal fees not to exceed $500 under Minn. Stat. § 117.232, sod. 1. 4. SELLERS HEREBY WAIVE IN ALL RESPECTS ANY RIGHT, ELIGIBILITY OR ENTITLEMENT TO ANY OF THE RELOCATION ASSISTANCE SERVICES, PAYMENTS AND BENEFITS AVAILABLE UNDER MINN. STAT. SECTION 117.52, SUBD. 1 AND SECTION 117.232, SUBD. 1, AS SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH IN PARAGRAPHS 2 AND 3 AB VE. 5. Sellers hereby declare: a. That they are being represented by legal counsel for tl a sale of the Property; b. That they have read this Agreement; c. That this Agreement has been explained to Sellers land that Sellers have understood its contents; -2- f d. That Sellers have entered into this Agreement voluntarily and not under any threat of acquisition by eminent domain by the Buyer; e. That this Agreement was executed at the same time as, and as a condition precedent to Buyer's agreement to purchase the Properly. f. That Sellers understand and acknowledge that Buyer ould not enter into an agreement to purchase the Property except in r iance on this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this instrument to be executed in duplicate as of the day hereinafter first written. r -3- SELLERS: GALEN'., . FUNK JUDITH FUNK BUYER: THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS is -- �'� `�� .. --i �� _r-w�i� tirr,�oU,��,v� _'�.� cj ��.e�-reed—n� a�� _,r�,.S �.,uf _ L �� Q/./ GCS ,�rt� • � _ 1_/ .._ i / n , t�. . / ,, � /� ,� G __ .Z�L� 1 � / ��i '7.'.,r_ 3 d-�'-h._'l ---�--_ice___-iZd�+�¢.._.� _ ._ � _ _ _�; _3. � ��► � __ _ ��_-� � City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING RELOCATION RULES AND GUIDELINES FOR CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FOR REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS Whereas, by Resolution 81 - 28, the City Council of City of Mendota Heights has created Development District 1 and a Tax Increment Redevelopment District to aid in t redevelopment'of particular parcels of land located with the City of Mendota Heights; and AND the No. n Whereas, Minnesota Statute Section 117.52 et. sect. requires that acquisition of properties by the acquiring authority shall be done according to the requirements for relocation assistance, services, payments and benefits set forth in the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended by the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987, and those regulations adopted pursuant thereto, and in effect as of July 1, 1988; and Whereas, M.S.A. 117.52 further requires that prior to adoption of those regulations, a public hearing must be held by the acquiring authority and a 30 -day public comment eriod provided; and Whereas, the City Council held the required public hearing on February 7, 1989, and provided a public comm nt period through March 9, 1989; and Whereas, no public comments were received during t2 at period. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota that required by M.S.A. 117. 52 et. seq., the relocation assistance, services, payments and benefits required b srm Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisil ries Act of 1970, as amended by the Surface .portation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of s the :ion 1987, 1p6 a `3 0 i Mendota Heights'Pblice Department Memorandum March 16, 1989 ' TO: ' Mayor, City Council, City l� for FROM: Dennis Delmont, Chief of Police//&U SUBJECT: Introduction of David Olson David L. Olson, Jr. will be at the meeting for the purpose of int formal appointment as a Mendota Heights Police Officer. At the 3/7/89 meeting, Council approved the hiring of David Olson co upon the successful completion of the background investigation, and and psychological examinations. These final steps have been success completed, and Mr. Olson has been offered, and has accepted, the pos Discussion David Leonard Olson, Jr. is 22 years old, and presently lives in Colu Heights. He attended C is Heights H' h School, and received his in Law Enforcement f orth Henn Community College in 1988. Da completed the P.O.S.T. required "Skills Course" at the Hibbing Techni Institute, also in 1988. Mr. Olson worked from 1984 to -April, 1988 a Medical Equipment Technician, and has been employed as a Community Se Officer for the Columbia Heights Police Department since April, 1988. Our selection procedures not only attempt to determine the candidate' potential to become a good Police Officer, but their potential to bec good Mendota Heights Police Officer as well. We feel that David Olsc that potential. t Recommendation That David L. Olson, Jr. be formally appointed a Probationary Mendota Police Officer with an effective starting date of April 1, 1989. i 4 l i :ion and ngent sical ly bia A Degree id al a vice e a has Heights �� S-1 YL 7� �.� . N �. 'Mendota Heights Police Department Memorandum March 15, 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council, City i f ator , FROM: Dennis Delmont, Chief of Police PJVFC* WA -eUMM *04444W. I v ToNn TIRTIMOTTITEM The enclosed information describes the Drug Abuse Resistance Educati (DARE) that has been so successful throughout the Country. DARE foc 5th Grade students and presents them with 17 one-hour lessons taught uniformed police officer. These sessions teach children how to say drugs and, at the same time, help increase their self-esteem and en ability to deal with stress and peer pressure. The Mendota Heights West St. Paul Police Departments, as well as School District #197, anxious to get this program started in our schools. I I was approached by Dr. Anderson, Superintendent of District #197, Polski, a member of the School Board. They had heard of the progra: the City of St. Paul and they were very impressed. We subsequently the Chiefs from Eagan and West St. Paul and reviewed the written ma video tapes, that describe the program. All of us were very enthu& determined that this program is positive, needed, proven successful effective. In order to make DARE work in our area, we will need a lot of suppo Officers must be selected and then sent out of State for 80 hrs. of This training is provided free, and the materials to administrate t are also provided by corporate sponsors throughout the country. Te be convinced that the program will work and they must be trained to through on the lessons. The Police Departments must make their DAR available to the schools and someone has to pay the bills. Our intention is to attempt to fund this program through a combinat public and private sources. We will solicit clubs and businesses f sustaining sponsorships and seek to secure the remainder of the fun, the cities and school district. Oiar target is to have the training the program ready to go by January, 1990. n Program ses on by a o to nce their Eagan and e very nd Joe through met with erial, and d and were and training. e program chers must follow Officers on of �ring from done, and The cost, for training the officers and delivering the instruction f first year, is expected to be approximately $12,500 for the five (5) elementary schools in District 197, About $4,000 of this is for the of the officers. I Recommendation It is very early to request any specific action by Council, but a vo support for the program and a pledge to provide some financial suppo needed. At this time I would ask that you indicate your support of program and authorize the expenditure of up to $2,000 for the traini officer from Mendota Heights. Action Reg uired Council motion supporting DARE as a joint project of the Mendo, West St. Paul, and Eagan Police Departments and Independent School #197, and authorizing the expenditure of up to $2,000 to train a M Heights Police Officer to deliver the program to the five 5th Grad Mendota and Somerset Elementary Schools. -2- ,r the training of is of one 'Heights, )i strict I ata classes in DARE TO SAY NO! /'V T W DARE ��a :�,o 0 A joint project of the Mendota Heights Police Department the West St. Paul Police Department and Independent School District 197 I PROJECT DARE DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM GRADES 5-6 Project DARE is a joint project of the Mendota Heights and West St. F Police Departments and Independent School District #197 to prevent di in Children and youth. Traditional drug abuse programs dwell on the effects of drugs. The program emphasis of Project DARE is to help st recognize and resist the many subtle pressures that influence them tc experiment with alcohol and marijuana. In addition, program strateg: planned to focus on feelings relating to self-esteem, interpersonal i communication skills, decision making, and positive alternatives to c behavior. The instructional guide for Project DARE has been developed to assis officers, school administrators, and teachers in the planning and implementation of a program of drug abuse resistance education for s Grades 5 and 6. g abuse armful dents s are d ug abuse police dents in The program content for Project DARE is organized into seventeen 45- 0 minute sessions to be conducted by a police officer, suggested extended act'vities to be taught by the regular classroom teacher. The sessions will be conducted by a specially trained police officerwho will be assigned to the school one day a week for one semester. The poli e officer will conduct the sessions in Grades 5 and 6 on a weekly basis. Project DARE offers a variety of activity -oriented techniques which i designed to encourage student -generated responses to problem -solving situations. An important element of Project DARE is the use of stude leaders who do not use drugs as positive role models in influencing 3 students not to use drugs. These students should be elected leaders been chosen by their peers as persons who are admired and respected. The last session of Project DARE should be designed as a culminating assembly -type activity to which all classes involved in Project DARE invited. This event will provide an opportunity for recognition of the peer lE for all the students and adults who participated in the program. Th( scheduling of an event of this nature requires the approval of the s( principal. .re mt ,ounger who have will be :aders and :hool Purpose PROJECT DARE DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM GRADES 5-6 Project DARE is a joint project of the Mendota Heights and West St. F Police Departments and Independent School District #197 to prevent di in Children and youth. Traditional drug abuse programs dwell on the effects of drugs. The program emphasis of Project DARE is to help st recognize and resist the many subtle pressures that influence them tc experiment with alcohol and marijuana. In addition, program strateg: planned to focus on feelings relating to self-esteem, interpersonal i communication skills, decision making, and positive alternatives to c behavior. The instructional guide for Project DARE has been developed to assis officers, school administrators, and teachers in the planning and implementation of a program of drug abuse resistance education for s Grades 5 and 6. g abuse armful dents s are d ug abuse police dents in The program content for Project DARE is organized into seventeen 45- 0 minute sessions to be conducted by a police officer, suggested extended act'vities to be taught by the regular classroom teacher. The sessions will be conducted by a specially trained police officerwho will be assigned to the school one day a week for one semester. The poli e officer will conduct the sessions in Grades 5 and 6 on a weekly basis. Project DARE offers a variety of activity -oriented techniques which i designed to encourage student -generated responses to problem -solving situations. An important element of Project DARE is the use of stude leaders who do not use drugs as positive role models in influencing 3 students not to use drugs. These students should be elected leaders been chosen by their peers as persons who are admired and respected. The last session of Project DARE should be designed as a culminating assembly -type activity to which all classes involved in Project DARE invited. This event will provide an opportunity for recognition of the peer lE for all the students and adults who participated in the program. Th( scheduling of an event of this nature requires the approval of the s( principal. .re mt ,ounger who have will be :aders and :hool To THE TEACHER: This information packet has been developed to familiarize you with thscope and sequence of the DARE lessions and to provide you with resources f>r conducting suggested extended activities. I The concepts and objectives for DARE are an integral part of the Distcict's Skills Continuum for Health. In addition, opportunities are provided for practice and reinforcement of basic skills listed in the oral and wriften language continuum. (Elementary School Curriculum -- A Balanced Pro cam. Publication No. X-107). The DARE officers will teach one lesson per week to the upper grade 1vel classes and will make scheduled visits to all other grade levels. r Please assist the DARE officer by: - Remaining in the classroom while the DARE lesson is bein conducted. The DARE officer is not credentialed. - Having your class ready at the scheduled time for the DARE lesson. - Providing the DARE officer with chalkboard space and occasional bulletin board space for display of student work. - Providing a place in the classroom to store the DARE student notebooks. - Keeping the DARE question box available to students. - Collecting DARE homework. - Using DARE vocabulary in language arts activities for reinforcement. Your cooperation and support will insure the success of Project DARE On January 18, 1983, Chief of Police Daryl F. Gates called upon the I Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) to join with the Los Angeles Department (LAPD) in establishing an anti-drug education program in e schools to begin with. Dr. Harry Handler, Superintendent of the Los Unified School District, strongly supported Chief Gates on the propoe was agreed that a cooperative effort by police and educators was nee( fight this growing problem. As a result of this agreement, a task f( LAPD and LAUSD personnel was created to develop such an education prc Experts in the educational and medical fields have come to the concl substance abuse education and prevention must begin before individua involved with those substances. Therefore, the task force proposed prevention curriculum model be developed and presented to children i and 6. Because the goal of prevention requires an attitudinal chang students, the traditional approach of teaching substance identificat emphasizing the dangers of abuse was abandoned. A curriculum which value decisions, self-concept improvement, respect for the law, and resistance training was developed instead. The purpose of the curri to provide children with the knowledge and the ability to say no to abuse and not be influenced by peer pressure which they encounter. Upon its full implementation, this program will reach over one -quart( million elementary school children annually. The goal of the prograr reduction of substance abuse in school-age children. The benefits o: this goal are priceless, not only for today, but also for the future children assume their roles as productive citizens and national lead( Police lementary Angeles al. It ed to rce of sion that s become hat a Grades 5 in on and ddresses lum is bstance r of a is the reaching when rs. i� On January 18, 1983, Chief of Police Daryl F. Gates called upon the I Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) to join with the Los Angeles Department (LAPD) in establishing an anti-drug education program in e schools to begin with. Dr. Harry Handler, Superintendent of the Los Unified School District, strongly supported Chief Gates on the propoe was agreed that a cooperative effort by police and educators was nee( fight this growing problem. As a result of this agreement, a task f( LAPD and LAUSD personnel was created to develop such an education prc Experts in the educational and medical fields have come to the concl substance abuse education and prevention must begin before individua involved with those substances. Therefore, the task force proposed prevention curriculum model be developed and presented to children i and 6. Because the goal of prevention requires an attitudinal chang students, the traditional approach of teaching substance identificat emphasizing the dangers of abuse was abandoned. A curriculum which value decisions, self-concept improvement, respect for the law, and resistance training was developed instead. The purpose of the curri to provide children with the knowledge and the ability to say no to abuse and not be influenced by peer pressure which they encounter. Upon its full implementation, this program will reach over one -quart( million elementary school children annually. The goal of the prograr reduction of substance abuse in school-age children. The benefits o: this goal are priceless, not only for today, but also for the future children assume their roles as productive citizens and national lead( Police lementary Angeles al. It ed to rce of sion that s become hat a Grades 5 in on and ddresses lum is bstance r of a is the reaching when rs. Vladimir Lenin, a Russian communist leader, once said, "I don't have to destroy the United States, they will destroy themselves." Even in h time, the early 20th Century, Lenin saw turmoil in America. He saw proble s of crime, -drugs and poverty in the future of our Country. Eighty years later we can see those problems growing and becoming more prominent in our so iety. What we need to ask ourselves is whether those problems are inherent in our society, problems which are built into society for which there are n apparent solutions or ones for which there may be solutions. With a positive approach, most organizations in America believe a change is possible. One org nization, the criminal justice system, seems to have the most potential of anyone of the power to change society, but so far, most of the criminal justice sy tem's efforts for solutions have failed. Between 1984 and 1985, crime rates rose almost 3% in relation to population increases. One property crime (burglary, larceny theft, motor vehicle theft) occurred every 3 seconds in 1985 according to the national crime clock and one violent crime (murder, forcible ape, robbery, aggravated assault) occurred every 24 seconds. (U.S. Dept. of Justice, p. 6). Such statistics show that the crime problem is growing in the United States, and you have to wonder if Lenin was right in his prediction. Are such problems as these wound up in our society and ways of living? Can there be solutions to the problems short of redeveloping the entire organization of our society? Before I develop an answer to the previous questions, I would like to look deeper into the problems at hand. Statistics show that there i more to crime than crime itself. A University of Southern California study stimated that 90% of all criminal acts are directly or indirectly related to drug use or trafficking. (L.A.P.D.-- Gates). These criminals are people who are under the influence of drugs, perpetuating the criminal condition, people ho resort to crime as a means of financial support for their drug habits, or p ople who -1- 1. are inhthe process of a drug transaction. Here we have to ask, does crime 6 come after drugs. If drugs are the reason for many people's involvement in crime,idrugs are responsible for those crimes committed. If a persoi who is poor spends most of their income supporting their drug habits, drugs are related to their poor economic situation. Jeffrey Reiman, an authority on criminal justice and philosophy, would argue that addiction is perva ive in our society. (Reiman, p.27) I would agree that almost everyone in lociety may be'addicted to something such as caffeine, food, or nicotine, bu not everyone is addicted to a serious drug such as cocaine, heroine, or Iven alcohol. Because drugs are a dangerous threat to society, drug use 4nd abuse in America is one important issue that needs to be addressed. This problem that can be connected to other major problems in society. .s a Sociologists have taken two approaches to drug abuse, one, that drug abuse is a genetic problem and two, that drug abuse is inherent in society. The genetic approach is one that has not been proven and to most people, it is unlikely that everyone who is addicted to a drug is so because of th it genetic codes. The approach that believes the drug abuse problem is inherent in society has better evidence to support its theories. It is easy connections between society and drug abuse by asking why people use For many people in society, drugs may be a way to cope with the pro stresses of their lifestyles. Once addicted to drugs, the poor may resort' to crime in order to support their habits. In this way the a high risk to drug abuse, although the poor are not the only ones r drugs.! We know about them, because they are the ones who are prose selective laws and are less likely to be acquitted for crimes since the resources to adequately defend themselves in a court of law. Anmother reason why people use drugs may be because they have learn 's -2- find , ugs. ms and ed to r are at ing ted by hey lack iman, 90) about t t . J i drugs `from peers and use them because they want to be accepted by of ers and to fit in.. In this way, drug abuse is carried through society because of the way in which people interact and learn from each other; we interact within our own social groups and we learn to be drug users from each other. In this manner, the problems could be considered inherent in the individual, but I believe the problem being inherent in society is more significant be ause r without society, the individual would not have this problem. Society creates the consumer, the consumer creats the market and the market creates he t condition. The criminal justice system's first solution to the drug abuse problems has been to stop the supply of drugs to the American people. Law enforcers have tried to stop drug trafficking from occurring and drug dealers from selling drugs in hopes that people would no longer have access to drugs. (Reiman, p.25) But new dealers have appeared and new ways of bringi g drugs into the country found. Other attempts to eliminate drug use, such as the temperance movement and the Prohibition Act, have failed as well and usually only made problems worse. Their second approach to a solution has been intervention, programs that have been initiated to provide rehabilitation. In 1966, the Narcotic Addiction Rehabilitation Act was passed. The purpose of this act was to provide alternatives to arrest and criminal prosecution for addicts, but the practices were so limited that it has never had much effect. (Chambers, p.30) Because the number of addicts had grown tb hundreds of thousa including youngsters from college, high school and junior high scho President Nixon declared drugs to be "a serious national threat" in F -3- (Chambers, p.31) In time, the problem has only worsened, but intervention programs have not significantly improved. Success rates for such p ograms run R at a mere 15-25%. (LAPD --Gates) Programs in intervention have not been more successful because stopping something that has already had a chance to begin is a difficult task. The programs deal with people who are already using or F addicted to drugs, and at this point it is often too late to effectloth vely help 4 them. 'Drug abuse programs are expensive, costing $419 million for rehabilitation and prevention in 1974. (Chambers, p.227) with the increase in crime rates and increases in the cost of living, the costs had tc be much higher thirteen years later, in 1986. The early prevention programE have not been anymore successful than intervention, and many people would argue that the past prevention programs have done more harm than good. Some of these programs have taken a pharmaceutical approach, providing an education for students who were predisposed to using drugs. Lessons focused on "bow to", hoping that young people would not use drugs. Some of the students involved in these programs could have taken advantage of -their education on ugs and used it to become avid drug users. Other programs focused on scare and rhetoric which exaggerated the negative effects of drug use. Th[actics se programs may have helped some young people, but most realized that t$e lessons exaggerated and lied about drug use, and decided to experiment on th it own. F 4 'In 1983, the Los Angeles Police Department and the Los Angeles Unified . ya School District developed a new early prevention program with a new ipproach. The D A.R.E. program (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) is based on a curriculum that focuses on peer resistance training, self-concept im rovement and value decision-making concerning respect for the law and personal safety. I (LAPD;-- Gates) Rather than giving kids an education to use drugs, the D.A.R.E. program gives students an education to resist drug use and zbuse. -4- g t .r 1' Rather than trying to stop the supply of drugs, the program is try'ng�to stop the demand for drugs through behavior modification. The first pil t program 1! was initiated in Los Angeles in the school year 1983-84 in 50 classrooms of • i� 5th and 6th graders. 5th and 6th graders were chosen as the target age group t, i because of statistics on first time drug use by young people. The greatest t; increases in the percentages of first time use of marijuana was from 3% in the 6th grade to 15.3% in the 7th -8th grades to another 15.2% in the 9th grade. (LAPD -- Gates, Table 10) For alcohol, the greatest percentage increases of at first time use was.from 9.6% in the 6th grade to 21.8% in 7th -8th crades and another 24.9% in 9th grade (see Table 10). For both marijuana and alcohol the highest percentage groups for first time use occurred during the 7th -8th and 9th grades, a total of 30.5% for alcohol and 46.7% for marijuana. A program for prevention would be too late to help many young people if begur at this point. By this time, attitudes of some students are already rebellious, and it was important for the D.A.R.E. program to be initiated before t en. With a few amendments to the pilot program, the D.A.R.E. program began in 110 of Los Angeles's 410 elementary schools and 10 of the 73 junior high scho is in the school year 1984-85. The 17 week curriculum consists of 17 lessons, one each week over the period of one or two semesters. Police officers in uniform serve as the teachers for the lessons after completing an 80 hour training program. The officers and the uniforms are used for credibility. Police officers are known to have a knowledge of the laws of the community, a knowledge of drug use and its impact on society, and are respected and looked up to by most children of the target group. (LAPD -- Gates) Because of their experiences with people, they also have an ability to communicate well with people. The first session, "PRACTICES FOR PERSONAL SAFETY", sets the basis for the entire program, -5- behavior modification. It is designed to acquaint students with the role of police and break barriers with police rapport, to review practices for safety, and to set rules for discipline in the classroom. In this lesson, students are taught good behavior and respect for the feelings of others. They are taught not to be disruptive and to participate in a positive way. In the second session, "DRUG ABUSE & MISUSE", students learn the harmful effects of drug use and abuse, which they often never hear about. The third lesson is designed to help kids consider the consequences of drug use that they may not otherwise consider.' The "CONSEQUENCES" lesson allows students to Xecognize that there are many consequences, both negative and positive, that result from using and choosing.not to use drugs. The teacher helps the students to sort out the positive and the negative, showing that most of the consequences of drug use are negative while most of the consequences for choosing not to use drugs are positive. The teacher points out that the positive consequences of using drugs are not worth the negative ones, and that there are otter alternatives to achieving the same positive consequences (i.e., relaxing, having fun, and feeling good). The major point of this lesson is that the students are shown that they have a choice and are taught a means to help them make the right decision. In the fourth lesson, "RESISTING PEER PRESSURES TO USE DRUGS", young students become aware of the types of peer pressures they may face and learn to say no to offers of drugs. Role playing is a major aspect of this lesson, giving students experience in dealing with different types of pressures. Then, in the fifth lesson, 'RESISTANCE TECHNIQUES -- WAYS TO SAY NO!", students are shown different techniques they can use t• turn down drugs. They are taught effective ways to say no in resisting various types of peer pressure and receive experience in using those techniques through role playing. "BUILDING SELF-ESTEEM", the sixth lesson, helps students to understand that self image results from both positive and negative feelings -6- and experiences. The seventh lesson, 'ASSERTIVENESS: A RESPONSE TYLE", then teaches the students that assertiveness enables a person to state their rights without losing self-esteem. In the eight lesson, "MANAGING STRESS WITHOUT TAKING DRUGS", students learn to recognize stress and learn different C ways to deal with it in ways other than using drugs (i.e. relaxation techniques). "MEDIA INFLUENCES ON DRUG USE", is the ninth lesson, that teaches lids skills needed to analyze and resist media presentations of drugs and alco ol. The tenth lesson, "DECISION MAKING AND RISK TAKING", helps students to use the decision making process in evaluating the risks involved in taking part in various behaviors, including drug use. In the eleventh lesson, "A TERNATIVES TO DRUG USE", students learn about interesting activities that are rewarding and have fewer negative consequences than using drugs. Older stud nts are brought in as positive role models in the twelfth lesson, "ROLE MO ELING". They are students who do not use drugs, who can talk with the students, answer their questions, and clarify the misconceptions that drug users ar in the majority and that they must use drugs to fit in. The thirteenth 1 sson, "FORMING A SUPPORT SYSTEM", enables the students to develop positive relationships with many different people as a support system. In the fourteenth lesson, "RESISTING GANG PRESSURES", students are able t identify with situations in which they may be pressured by the gangs or gro ps of people and are able to evaluate the consequences of the choices that are available. The final three weeks of the program consist of the "D A.R.E. SUMMARY", in which students assess what they have learned from the program, "TAKING A STAND", when students present their own demonstration of what they have learned in the program in the form of a skit, song or dance, and the "CULMINATION" which is the graduation when each student receives a diploma. (NOTE: The 5th and 6th grades run on the 17 -lesson program, while the version for the 7th graders in junior high is run on a 9 -lesson program.) -7- Project D.A.R.E. represents a major financial investment in reventive education, costing approximately three dollars per student. (LAPD -- Gates) However, the cost is inconsequential when compared to the price people are paying for crimes caused by drug abuse. This is especially import nt when you consider the exorbitant costs of intervention programs. Although, the D.A.R.E. Program deals with primary prevention and does not deal a effectively with those young people who have already chosen to use drugs. The only help the program has for kids who are already involved with d ugs would be a referral to an intervention program. D.A.R.E. is not a cure or drug abuse, but it can be used as a vaccine to help many children stay way from drugs. Its goal is not to wipe out drug use completely, but to co trol a situation that is now out of hand. Because this program is a preventative program that works with the people who may be the victims of the p oblem, Jeffrey Reiman would argue that it is "blaming the victim". (Reiman) That by placing a solution in laps of individuals in society, we are also placing the blame in their laps. Why would the criminal justice system be helping them if they are not the cause of the problem? Because they may hold a so ution. Warren L. Juhnke, the regional superintendent of the Los Angeles U ified School District, commented, "Over the years of my experience with the schools, there has been no program about which we have received more positive input from children, parents, community and school staff than the D.A.R. . Program." (LAPD -- Gates). According to a 1985 UCLA study evaluating the D.A.R.E. Progr m, of the students that had completed the program, the immediate effects ran a success rate of 85%. (LAPD -- Gates) Students in the 5th grade classes averaged an increase of 36% on a drug awareness test given before and after completion of the program. (LAPD -- Gates) Awareness was improved for myths such as "It is -8- okay to drink or use drugs at a party if everyone else is". and "K I ds who use drugs have more friends." Students in the 6th grade classes improved 38% on the test, and the 7th graders improved 34%. After completing the D.A.R.E. Program, 85% of the students showed improvements in work habits an grade point averages and decreases in behavioral problems as well as a dcrease in crime levels on campuses. These findings are the only concrete evLdence we have that the program is having an effect on the young people invoLved. Because the program is new and not yet wide -spread, no long term eEfects can be known. If, and when, D.A.R.E. reaches across the nation and the drug free generation has a chance to take hold, we may see the results as a decrease in drug abuse and crime rates. By 1986, D.A.R.E. will have impacted 276 of the elementary s"hools in Los Angeles and 16 of the junior high schools. Success or failure of the program will depend not only on the curriculum, but also on the mo al and financial support received by concerned citizens and businesses. 4th the support it needs, D.A.R.E. may be able to help our young people re lize what their priorities should be, that they don't need drugs, that they have the power and right to say no to drugs, and that they can make their own decisions by considering the consequences. Without any sort of drug abuse elucation, most high school and junior high school students have not considered the consequences of drug use. (LAPD -- Gates) Many begin using drugs because they are misinformed or uninformed and want to fit in with other students. Because they think that everyone uses drugs they see no reason not to. Even the 5th and 6th graders, who are developing a social awareness, an-.icipate peer pressure to use drugs. A program, such as D.A.R.E. may provide younger students with information of what they will be up against, and help to prepare them to deal with the drug situation. Although the program is not a solution, Utz it may be a means to help control the drug abuse problem which, in turn, should decrease crime rates. There will still be crime, but there should be less crime as well as more people in our society who are healthier and thinking more clearly. Just as well as the negative aspects for d ug,use outweigh the positive ones, the positive aspects of the D.A.R.E. p ogram outweigh the negative ones. It is an early prevention program that has much potential in educating children about drug use and abuse, as well s teaching decision making skills, coping skills, and self-discipline. One statement from a D.A.R.E. graduate says it all: "Knowing the consequences of drugs and alcohol, I don't want to take the risk." (LAPD -- D.A.R.E. Video ape) -10- SESSION ONE: SESSION TWO: SESSION THREE: SESSION FOUR: SESSION FIVE: SESSION SIX: SESSION SEVEN: SESSION EIGHT: SESSION NINE: SESSION TEN: SESSION ELEVEN: SESSION TWELVE: SESSION THIRTEEN: SESSION FOURTEEN: SESSION FIFTEEN: SESSION SIXTEEN: SESSION SEVENTEEN: PROJECT DARE OFFICER TAUGHT LESSONS Practices for Personal Safety.......... Drug Use and Misuse .................... Consequences ........................... Resisting Pressure to Use Drugs........ # Resistance Techniques -- Ways to Say No Building Self -Esteem ................... Assertiveness: A Response Style....... Managing Stress Without Taking Drugs... #* Media Influences on Drug Use........... Decision making and Risk Taking........ #* Alternatives to Drug Abuse............ * Role -modeling .......................... # Forming A Support System ............... Ways to Deal With Pressures from Gangs. # Project DARE Summary ................... Taking a Stand ......................... DARE Culmination ....................... * Suggested Extended Activites for the Teacher # Homework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DARE LESSONS 1. PRACTICES FOR PERSONAL SAFETY - Used to acquaint students with r(Ile of police and review practices for safety of students. 2. DRUG USE AND MISUSE - Helps students understand harmful effects of drugs if they are misused. 3. CONSEQUENCES - Helps students understand that there are many oonsec uences, both positive and negative, that result from using and choosing not to use drugs, 4. RESISTING PRESSURES TO USE DRUGS - To make students aware of kinds of peer pressure they may face and to help them learn to say no to offers to use dr ' gs. 5. RESISTANCE TECHNIQUES: WAYS TO SAY NO - Teaches students ways to say no In resisting various types of pressure. 6. BUILDING SELF-ESTEEM - Helps students understand that self-image results from positive and negative feelings and experiences. 7. ASSERTIVENESS: A RESPONSE STYLE - Teaches that assertiveness is response style that enables a person to state his or her own rights without loss of self -est 8. MANAGING STRESS WITHOUT TAKING DRUGS - Helps students recogniz a stress and suggests ways to deal with it other than by taking drugs. 9. MEDIA INFLUENCES ON DRUG USE - Helps students develop the underst nding and skills needed to analyze and resist media presentations about alcohol and drugs. 10. DECISION MAKING AND RISK TAKING - Helps students apply the decision making process in evaluating the results of various kinds of risk-taking behavior, including that of drug use. 11. ALTERNATIVES TO DRUG USE - Helps students find out about activites I. at are interesting and rewarding and that are better than taking drugs. 12. ROLE MODELING - Older student leaders and other positive role models t at do not use drugs talk to younger students to clarify the mis conception that drug u;ers are in the majority. 13. FORMING A SUPPORT SYSTEM- Students will be able to develop posit!e relationships with may different people in order to form a support system. 14. RESISTING GANG PRESSURES - Students will be able to identify situations in which they may be pressured by gangs and to evaluate the co isequences of the choices available to them. 15. DARE SUMMARY - Helps students summarize and assess what they learr ed from the program. 16. TAKING A STAND -Students complete own commitment and present to clElss. Helps them respond effectively when pressured to use drugs. 17. CULMINATION - Special exercise for all students. NOTE: IF NOT USING LESSON #14 (GANG LESSON), USE ALTERNATIVE LESSON FOR LESSONS #11 & #12, AND DO -ROLE-MODELING" FOR LESSON #13 AND -SUPPORT SYSTEM' FOR LESSON #14. a PROJECT DARE SUGGESTED EXTENDED ACTIVITIES FOR THE TEACHER 1. Discuss with students personal safety when they go shopping malls, parks, and shows. 2. Have students make a directory of important servicel phone numbers to take home and place next to the to SESSION SIX: BUILDING EBF' -ESTEEM 1. Assign the following activities as an art lesson or homework. I Ask students to print their name vertically on 1 left-hand side of a sheet of paper. Then instri to think of a word for each of the letters that with the same letter and that describes them in positive manner. For example: Reliable Useful Thoughtful Helpful Ask students to design their own personal liven (seven letters or numbers or a combination). 2. Collect assignments. Share students work with the Teachers may want to display students' sample lice on the bulletin board. and e. for ict them begins a plate f f icer. e plate SESSION EIGHT• MAANAGING STRESS WITHOUT TAKING DRUG ;I - 1. Y1. Conduct a class discussion to review major points on st were covered in the lesson by the officer. a. Stress refers to the mental or physical strain felt about a situation or event. b. Everybody feels stress; it is a basic part of our daily life. c.. Some stress is helpful, but too much stress can be Y 2. Review students responses to the homework assignment woi entitled, "Stressors." 3. Ask students how many used the deep breathing exercise i stressful situations. Ask, "How many found deep breath helpful?" SESSION NINE: MEDIA INFLUENCES ON DRUG USE 1. Ask students to make posters illustrating anti -alcohol drug messages. 2. Request students to collect ads to make collages for dis SESSION FOURTEEN: ROLE MODELING ass that r sheet anti - 1. Conduct a discussion to review with students what they 1 arned from the visit by the high school students. 2. Explain to students that one of the ways to express their appreciation to the high school students for taking the time to come and talk to the class is to write a thank you no e. Write a sample form for the note on the chalkboard and a k students to follow it by writing their own notes. DRUG CONSEQUENCES PEER PRESSURE SELF-ESTEEII ASSERTIVENESS STRESS STRESSORS MD IA RISK ALTERNATIVE SUPPORT SYSTEll YOUTH GANG INTIHIDATE 4 A 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. PROJECT DARE TWENTY WAYS TO ENCOURAGE YOUR CHILDREN TO USE DR Never eat together as a family. Never have family outings which occur weekly, monthly, or annually that they forward to as a family unit. Talk IQ your children, not WITH them; never listen. Punish your children in public and never praise them or reinforce their positive behavior. Always solve their problems; make their decisions for them. Leave the responsibility of teaching morality and. spiritual training to the schoc the church. Never let your children experience cold, fatigue, adventure, injury, risk, challe experimentation, failure, frustration, discouragement, etc. Threaten your children. i.e., "if you ever try drugs or alcohol, I'll punish you." Expect your children to get "A"'s in school in all subjects. Always pick up after them and don't encourage them to accept responsibility. Discourage your child from talking about their feelings. i.e., anger, sadness, I Be overprotective and donl teach your child the meaning of the word conseq Make your child feel that their mistakes are sins. Put your child off when they ask "why" and tell them, "Because I said so." Lead your child to believe that you are perfect and infallible. Keep your home atmosphere in a state of chaos. Never tell them how much you love them and never discuss your feelings will Never hug them or display affection in front of them. Always expect the worst and never give them the benefit of the doubt. Don't ever trust them. I an look and , etc. i them. NAM HO.UEVORK CLASS DIRECTIONS: Create a personal license plate. Write in the month you were born in and the state and the year. Use no more than seven letters and numbers. A blank counts one space. Example: 11onth State Year harch] I Californial 1 1970] ® 9 * 10 H H [E] K Mendota Heights Police Department Memorandum March 15, 1989 e7) TO: Mayor, City Council, City i for r X, FROM: Dennis Delmont, Chief of Police114� Uw 09TTA-M W." qn q0wow The communities of Mendota Heights, Hastings, Farmington, Inver Grovel] South St. Paul, West St. Paul, and Rosemount, are joining with Dakota in forming the East Metro Drug Task Force. On February 1, 1988, the South Metro Task Force was formed using off the cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Dakota County, Eagan, and La The Task Force provided a consistent, well -manned and well-equipped deal with the increasing drug problems in the southwest portion of D County. After 11 months this group has caused the arrest, and charg 133 people on 138 drug counts. In addition, they have confiscated o $500,000 worth of drugs, $93,000 in cash, and $43,000 worth of vehic attached "press release" describes their activities. Our "grow -house" bust in Mendota required a month-long surveillance time of 27 officers from four different agencies. We were able to help, because we had already established the approximate scope of t operation, and were able to lure in assistance on that basis. We d the people, or equipment, to run down the mobile and sophisticated that are operating in Dakota County. As this is a shared problem, shared solution. leights, 'ounty :rs from 7ille. Lt to ng, of . The and the et their not have ealers t begs a The cost of the Task Force for our City will be one officer, who will approximately 24 hours per month to surveillance and undercover wo- - . He/she will work under the direction of Sgt. Mike Commeford of the DakotaCounty Sheriff's Office, who will also provide the equipment and clerical services for the Task Force. All seizures and forfeitures will be used for "buy money" and transportation for the Task Force, and an annual disbursement f the excess will be made to member cities. I r PI believe that the EMTF is an excellent compliment to the DARE Progra Together they will provide a two -prong attack on the problem that is overcoming us. While the Task Force attacks the rotten fruit, the D) Program will reinforce the root system. I recommend that Council vol support the Police Department's dedication of one officer to part-tir with the East Metro Task Force. quickly e to e duty That Council endorse a Mendota Heights Police Officer being dedicate on a part-time basis to the East Metro Drug Task Force. The officer's sa ary, and overtime, will be paid by the Mendota Heights Police Department. Mc OFFICE OF DAKOTA COUNTY ATTORNEY JAMES C. BACKSTROM COUNTY ATTORNEY Dakota County Government Center Telephone 1560 West Highway 55 (612) 438.4438 Hastings. Minnesota 55033 PRESS RELEASE Charles A. Dleme First Assistant ADDED ENFORCEMENT CRACKS DOWN ON DRUG DEALING IN DAKOTA Dakota County Attorney James C. Backstrom has announcd that his office and several Law Enforcement Agencies have ste ped up enforcement against drug dealers in Dakota County. In cooperation with seven law enforcement agencies in Dakota and Scott Counties, the Dakota County Attorney's Office participated in the organization of the South Metro Drug Task Force. This Task Force is funded in part -by Federal dollars distrib ted by the State through the Narcotics Enforcement Coor4 nating Committee. Each participating agency which is funded muEt also provide matching - funds in the amount• of •25%:*of:*the Federal monies allocated. I,n_. Dakota -County,*the police departme.ts of Burnsville, Eagan, Lakeville, and Apple Valley as well has the Dakota County Sheriff are participating in this coor inated effort to "crack down" on illicit drug activities. In th first year of operation, the Prior Lake and Savage Police Departments in Scott County also participated in this effort, Backstrom said. Coordination occurred between the Dakota County Att rney's Office and the Scott County Attorney's Office which resu4ted in the joint prosecution of a major drug ring. James Terwe o, the Scott County Attorney, indicated that his office charged 20 drug Criminal Division Civil Dhvision I luncu Services Division Robert R. King. Jr., I lead Karen A. Schaffer. Head Donal( L. Bruce. I lead victim/witness Coordinator An Equal Opp ortunily JoAnn Berens Employer O e Press Release - Crackdown on Drugs February 2, 1989 Page 2 offenses investigated by the South Metro Drug Task Force in 1988. Mr. Terwedo has stated his office has experienced a large increase overall in drug prosecution. Backstrom noted there has not been such a coordinated drug enforcement effort since the. Metropolitan Area Narcotics Squad (MANS) nearly a decade and a half ago. Backstrom has -indicated that this coordinated eff rt to eliminate this blight -on society has been highly successful. In South Metro's first year of operation alone, 138 drug related offenses were charged. by the Dakota- County Attorney's office. There were 116 other felony drug offenses charged by Back trom's office which were investigated by other law enforcement agencies in 1988. Therefore, the total number of drug offenses charged in 1988 by the Dakota County Attorney's Office was 254. This, is up from 137 counts on drug cases during 1987 in Dakota County, representing an increase of approximately 85%. "I anticipate even more charges during 1989 as the formation of the Task Force required some start up and organizational efforts which won't have to be duplicated this year", -Backstrom indicated. In anticipation of increased drug charges to be filed by his office, Backstrom has sought and received funding for an add tional felony prosecutor- in- his office. ---A federal grant of $15 000.00 has been obtained to partially fund the position, a d the Press Release - Crackdown on Drugs February 2, 1989 Page 3 remaining funding was provided by the Dakota County Bo Commissioners. "I am extremely pleased to see that the r rd of rs of the County Board as well as City Councils in Eagan, Burnsville, Apple Valley and Lakeville have recognized that such J a coordinated law enforcement effort is needed to attack this ever increasing problem and they have provided their sup ort to our efforts. Without such funding and support, this Drug Task Force could not function". Backstrom indicated. Dakota I County Sheriff Rod Boyd also compliments the County Board, participating City Councils, and the Federal authorities for providing support for this effort. "This coordinated effort by law enforcement agencies is surely needed to combat this growing problem," says Boyd, who --has served as Dakota County's Sheriff for 14 years. Boyd has indicated that he has devoted a full-time deputy on his staff to assist in this effort as well as adminis rative assistance by Chief Deputy Rich Thul: Supervising Agent of the Task Force, Mark Raas, stated very pleased with the collective efforts in arresting con substance offenders. Mr. Raas feels that a dent has been he was rolled ?ut in drug dealing because of this intensified coordinated effort. Agent Raas stated that even more manpower is needed because the problem is more pervasive than originally ---thought.------ The Task Force has compiled some impressive statistics in its fir§t year Press Release - Crackdown on Drugs February 2, 1989 Page 4 of operation. Over six pounds of cocaine were seized �ith a street value of over half a million dollars, over 40 you ds of marijuana were seized with a street value of of $40,000.00. Over $93,000.00 in cash were seized and over $43,000.00 in vehicles and other assets were confiscated. Dakota County Attorney James Backstrom has indicate that this is just the beginning of a "crackdown on drugs" whi h his office will help coordinate. "Community Education as well as law enforcement efforts must be under taken to combat this problem. I am currently seeking funding_... sources ..to . further__ enab a our office to coordinate and participate in school and community education programs to enlighten youth as well as adults f the dangers• associated with drug. use", Backstr.om_:said. The Dakota - County Attorney's Office has just recently assisted 'In the development of a slide presentation regarding the .drug problem which County Attorney Backstrom hopes to share with as many schools and community forums as possible. "I am also spo soring an "Anti -Drug Poster Contest" for children in 6th through 8th grades which is being well received by Dakota County schools and which will allow students themselves to make a statem6nt in opposition of this blight on society", Backstrom stated. _�__:_._..... information. regarding._._.this_:_.drug::::poster_�contest:._wll___Y available in the weeks to come. rther _made i Press Release - Crackdown on Drugs February 2, 1989 Page 5 County Attorney Backstrom indicated that another problem which must be dealt with in this "crackdown on drugs" is strengthening of , the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines. "Sentencing Guidelines in Minnesota are simply too lenient when it comes to major drug related offenses and other serious crimes". Backstrom stated. He, along with other prosecutors throughout the state, are seeking tougher penalties fo such crimes. • Increased efforts on drug investigation and prosecutio have begun in.. Dakota County and will continue.------- Coordinated law enforcement efforts such as the South Metro Drug Task For . -e are beginning to have an effect. Dakota County Attorney James Backstrom wishes to thank the officers participating ir this group as well as their police chiefs and city councils for providing the resources, hard work and cooperation which has resulted in this successful start in combating this serious problem. If you have any questions or desire any additional information, please contact James C. Backstrom, Dakota County Attorney, at 438-4438. Mendota Heights Police Department MEMORANDUM DATE: 13 February, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council City Adm'se FROM: Police Chief SUBJECT: purchase of Fuming Equipment INTRODUCTION The Police Department requests Council approval to purchase an e fume hood, fuming cabinet and blower for processing evidence. T this equipment has been quoted at $4,970. Losion proof cost of HISTORY The Department requested, and Council approved, $4,000. in the 19E9 budget for the purchase of this equipment. It is used for processing evidence with cycloanate, ether, ninhydrin and other potentially dangerous chemicals and powders. This figure was supplied by Gene Lange eighteen months go. As you can see, the prices have gone up since then. DISCUSSION In the "old building" we used a 10 gallon aquarium and a residential exhaust fan for our fuming. In the enclosed environment of the new property room we can no longer do this. The aquarium is only large enough to accommodate very small items, one at a time. The equipment we wish to purchase wi 1 meet all Code requirements, will allow us to process a large number of ite s simultaneously, and will even accommodate the processing of rifle and shotguns. We received quotations from the two local suppliers ofthis equipment and they are attached. We budgeted $3,750 for furnishings for my office and the "Quiet Room". I was able to furnish the "Quiet Room" for $1,700 and am holding off on my office until we find out how much money we will need for other necessities. The un - budgeted $970 could come out of this fund. a ALTERNATIVES We can forego the purchase and rely on the St. Paul Police Depart e process our evidence. They will charge us, on an hourly, basis f z service. They presently charge approximately $30 per hour for la The major problems with this alternative are the long term expense, slow turn around time. Their lab is extremely busy and we must w i in order to have work done. In addition, any evidence developed hJ require a representative from their lab to testify in our court calc would significantly add to the expense. RECOMMENDATION It is our recommendation that Council approve the purchase of a fan from Fisher Scientific for $4,970. r nt to this services. and the t our turn them could S. This base and Fidel.✓' CI�if1C Quotation TO: G,,� �� 1 41 J' ALS. CORRESPONDENCE MUST REFER T NO. 16 apt A QUOTATION NO.: c� f DATE:CMU DELIVERY TIME: 41 (NeQkS TERMS: Prices are firm for 3e quoted for prompt acc approval. standard ter IN REPLY TO INQUIRY NO.: DATED: / / Balances oys unless otherwise noted. Rices lance. Subject to pprtior credit s aro not 3 days 1rr all invoices due date to remainin-1u servicechargeof 1 ,,r aid at are subject per month until paid. QUANTITY FISHER CATALOG NUMBER DESCRIPTION UNIT t r $.p}�{ PRI E NES' PRICE g� S� i',�b('anCd �x�ia t,�r� ��? 06� P 7 Oct a 174 �rJ h rs� a6l�60(Z JX1016i'dV^ �r4d= �� 3135`. �i� ��(r 60 h004 �C.liJ•J! 5 1 ti /1 / ,'� f�f%Cl-v�r� 1�,bran�a) I3�ls. o `�UO,6 1 We 1111..^,l our offer will muol with your approve) and you will favor us with your order for the above. We welcome the oprtuntty to be of service to _ you. � in Farm No. *114 Rev, 1187 Lilho in 11.1 S A VWR Scientific Inc. subsidiary of Univar '--ry7 m'l eld, We are pleased to submit the following quotation, subject to the terms and conditions on the reverse side. PRICES VALID FOR .Z_ DAYS. Your Inquiry No. Prices: FOB% Terms: I)'d 3 0 Delivery CATALOG Date: Quotation No. VWR By LIT QUANTITY UNIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION PRICE UNIT EXTENSION QC.;)Gniavl7Yl j� P`� �1G P6 C�i� 1 bs 9 i3 h p p lam_ /000 p v X01 � (.• �- » `l - v ' rIZ -rte .o e', Aa c'ne,� 6OF31 ` (,a,6 -f "A� tZ.�cc� �.(s-' 150() / c.. ,�citt'✓�rcv `JOS• 83 / �( tiU L G,� ��-� _, 9oL©� u D U U P�6 kot l cc} YIC3' l ( y'' , , c r -(Y r vr-`� /.300 °e' 4� I I I L Thank you for the opportunity to offer this quotation. SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON REVERSE SIDE. 60 0001 2 14 lel 3 r CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO 0 11 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEVIN Z L ITY ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: Discussion of City Attorney Reports on Adult*U and Retail Hours of Operation DATE: March 17; 1989 �s Included with the materials for your February 7 meeting w re memorandums from the City Attorney's office considering municipal regulation of sexually oriented businesses, and of the hours of operation for retail establishments. Due to the length of the February 7 meeting (and also the February 2 meeting), Council has never discussed these issues. I am placing them on the Agenda once again, in case time allow for that discussion at the March 21 meeting. Please be sure to bring your copy of these memorandums, w ic: were dated January 17, 1989, and addressed to me in the f rm of a letter. If you have misplaced your copies, please contact the City offices. ACTION REQUIRED To discuss the City Attorney's analysis, and direct Staff to whatever further action Council wishes to take on thes matters. KDFj ak as MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS February To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevin Frazell, A i City for Re: City Attorney Re or s on Adult Uses and Retail Hours of Operation , 1988 Council has previously requested the City Attorney to provide an anlysis of the legal issues surrounding City regula ion, of adult uses and retail hours of operation in the community. Those analyses are attached for Council review and consideration. As can be seen by reading the memo, instituting either type of regulation will likely require a good deal of additional background study and research, either by staff, the City Attorney's Office, or an independent consultant. Council may will want to consider whether, in light of other priority issues, these warrant the allocation of City funds and time. CTION REQUIRED To review and discuss the memos, then provide directi staff and the City Attorney on whether to continue pu these issues. k to wing L WINTHROP & WEINSTINE SHERMAN WINTIIROP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW EDWARD J. ORENTTEL DANIEL C. ADAMS ROBERT q, WCINSTINE RonICO, IID A. NOEL JEFFREY R, ANSEL EY N. RS ROGER B. GORDON 3200 MINNESOTA WORLD TRADE CENTER STEVEN C. TOUREK LAURJErr OCKE LAURIE A. KNOCKE STEPHEN J, SNYDER HART KULLEq 30 EAST SEVENTH STREET WILLIAM r, ROIIRMAN LLOYD W. GROOMS nmo DAVID P.PEARSON THOMAS M. HART IV JULIEKcNN.WILLAMSON MARK JULIE . OHNSMSON DARRON C. NNUTSON SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA SSIOI JOHN A. KNAPP BROOKS r. POLEY STEPHEN B. YOUNG JULIEPATRICIA I. qC ELL MICHELE 0.VAILLAN000RT TELEPHONE 16121 290-8400 DAVID E. M04AK JR. TIMOTHY R.DUN A TIMOTHY NIEL DONALD J. BROWN JONJ.HOOANSON M D SON DANIAN MICHELE C. JOSEPH C.NAUHAN SANDRA J. MARTIN GARY W. SCHOKMILLER DANIEL C. BECK ERIC J. NYSTROM BRIAN J. KLEIN TODD B. URNESS SCOTT J. DONGOSKE KRISTIN L.Pr TERSON JOANNE L.MATZEN PETER J. GLCEKELp ROBERT S. SOSKIN January 17, 1989 DANIEL P. OTSTEOAL JErrR[Y w. COOK TELCCOPY 16121292.9347 Mr. Kevin Frazell City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Re: Regulation of Sexually Oriented Business Dear Kevin: It is our understanding that the City Council has expressed a desire to provide for the regulation and control of sexually -oriented businesses; e.g. a ult bookstores. The purpose of this letter is to provide a brief outline of a municip lity's power to regulate such adult uses. This letter is not intended to be a legal memorandum on the above subject, but rather should be read as an introduction to the issues inherent in this type of regulation. Any Individual proposal would have to be evaluated separately on its own particular terms. Current Regulations: The regulation of adult business is my minimally addressed in the existing City Ordinances. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 901, various acts and materials are defined as public nuisances and the owner of property on which these acts occur Is subject to monetary penalties ($5.00-500.0) and possible Imprisonment (5-90 days). Adult uses can be considered a nuisal ice under the general provision of Section I of the Ordinance if the thing, act, occupation or use of property": 1.1 [S]liall annoy, Injure or endanger the safety, health, comf Irt or response of the public; 1.2 [Sjhall offend public decency; 1.4 [S]hall in any way render the public insecure in life I or in use of property." More specifically, Section 3 of Ordinance No. 901 labels as nuisance "all indecent or obscene pictures, books, pamphlets; magazines and newspapers." Mr. Kevin Frazell January 17, 1989 Page Two In addition, Ordinance 902 -defining and prohibiting disorderly might be invoked against adult uses. The more pertinent sect Section 1.1 and 1.2, respectively, which prohibit acts "willfully disturl of any family or neighborhood" or "[of] open and gross lewdness behaviour, or any act of public Indecency". The Disorderly Conduct penalty provisions comparable to that found in the Nuisance Ordinance onduct - also ons would be Ing [the] quiet or lascivious Ordinance has By their terms, the above ordinances only allow the City to re pond after the fact. That is, the ordinances do not truly regulate adult uses, but merely permit the City to Impose penalties against such uses should they create or permit the prohibited acts. Scope of Control: The regulation of sexually orientated b sinesses poses special problems the kind and degree of which are not encountered in the regulation of other retail commercial uses. Although obscenity can be prohibited, sexually explicit books, magazines, movies and dancing may fall within the scope of expressions protected under the state and federal constitutions, principally the First Amendment. As a result, while such uses can be regulated, the local ordinances cannot act as a "prior restraint" on the activity. The purpose of tie ordinance(s) must be content -neutral; (i.e., it cannot be intended to eliminate or censor the speech or activity). Instead the aim of regulation must be to prese ve the quality of urban life by avoiding the "secondary effects" associated with the regulated uses; e.g. preventing crime, protecting property values, avoiding neighborhoo deterioration. Alternative Forms of Regulation: Generally, regulations take one of three forms: 1) a total ban; 2) license or permit requirements; or 3) special location restrictions. While each of these alternatives has its own distinct appeal and advantages, each likewise has inherent characteristics which makes il vulnerable to being struck down if improperly constructed. Total Ban: Any attempt by the City to ban sexually orierhted businesses altogether will be highly susceptible to constitutional attack. Similarly, even if the prohibition is not expressed, the imposition of regulations which have the effect of excluding such uses may also be struck down. Permits & Licenses: Alternatively, the chief problem with licensing regulation is the issue of prior restraint; i.e., effectiv, something before it occurs. To be upheld, licensing or permitting req be shown to: "I) further the enforcement of legitimate location requirements; 2) the monitoring of adult uses in regard to their sec and 3) the insuring that adult uses do not violate criminal laws agair obscenity and the like." Further, any taxes or fees must be shown to meet the administrative and enforcement costs of the regu excessive fees are likely to be struck down as constituting a prior r subject activity. )ermitting and !ly suppressing drements must and distancing mdary effects; st prostitution, o be necessary atory scheme; �straint on the Mr. Kevin Frazell January 17, 1989 Page Three Moreover, the licensing and permitting process must be governe objective and definitive standards. An ordinance without standards employs generalized parameters (e.g., public health, safety and welfare be Invalidated because of vagueness and it is always vulnerable to a c It results in arbitrary or capricious actions when it is applied. Special Location Restrictions: The third alternative available to uses is regulating their locations. Although not immune from ate restrictions have repeatedly been upheld when reasonably drafted and Is true both of restrictions which concentrate adult uses and those 1 adult uses by separating them from one another and/or from resider uses, e.g., parks, schools ok churches. In general, to pass constitul location restrictions must satisfy three requirements: "I) the ordinance a substantial public purpose; 2) the ordinance must leave open reasonal locations for communication of the type of expression regulated; ordinance must not be motivated primarily by the desire to suppress se speech itself." Significantly, the controlling of the secondary effects has been accepted as "a substantial public purpose." Equally importa the requirement that there must be a "reasonable basis" to believe th-C regulations support and advance the public purpose(s). FInally, t ordinance still must - be drafted with sufficient detail and objectii standards to avoid claims of vagueness, arbitrariness, or over or und, either on Its face or as applied. J by narrow, or one that I Is likely to hallenge that control adult ack, location applied. This 411ch disperse tial or public lonal muster, must further le alternative and 3) the ;ually explicit of adult uses it however is t the adopted ie underlying e terms and rinclusiveness Presuming a decision is made to utilize locational restrictions, before the restrictions can be drafted, the City Council must decide whether the aim is to (1) concentrate the uses to a single area or (2) require the uses to be dispersed throughout the municipality. The choice is between asking one area to shoulder the brunt of the problems associated with the adult businesses or having all areas sharing equally In the' CIty's accommodation of these uses. We preume that the latter alternative would make more sense in a community like Mendota Heights. Now, by virtue of a recent U.S. Supreme Court case, the e findings of other cities can be relied upon in proving that a local ordi the substantial public purpose of controlling the secondary effects < As such, a first step in the development of regulations to govern ad be to evaluate the prior and current ordinances of other municipalit Twin Cities metropolitan area (e.g. Minneapolis and St. Paul) relative t on the presence, location and effects of adult uses and their abilitl judicial scrutiny. perience and ance furthers f adult usses. It uses would es within the their impact to withstand Mr. Kevin Frazell January 17, 1989 Page Four If you have questions or wish us to provide legal authority or the above, please do not hesitate to contact us. I Sincerely yours, WINTH & WEINSTINE Lloyd W.1 Grooms LWG:cab SHERMAN WINTIIROP ROBERT R. WEINSTINE RICHARD A. NOEL "ODER O. GORGON STEVENC. TOUREK STEPHEN J. SNYDER HART KULLER DAVID P. PEARSON 7140MAS M. HART IV DARRON C. KNUTSON JOHN A.KNAPP STEPHEN S. YOUNG MICHELE O. VAILLANCOURT DAVID L 040RAK JR. DONALD J. BROWN JON J. NOOANSON SANDRA J. MARTIN GARY W. SCHOKMILLER TODD B. URNESS SCOTT J. OONGOSKE PETER J. OLECKEL ROBERT S. SOSKIN JEffREY W. COOK WINTHROP & W E I N S T IN E ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 3200 MINNESOTA WORLD TRADE CENTER 30 EAST SEVENTH STREET SAINT PAULP MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE 16121290-8400 Mr. Kevin Frazell City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 January 17, 1989 Re: Restricting of Business Hours of Operation Dear Kevin: EDWARD J. DRENTTEL DANIEL C. ADAMS JEFFREY R. ANSEL JEFFREY N. SAUIIDERS LAURIE A. KNOCKE WILLIAM r. MOHRMAN LLOYD W. GROOMS KENNETH D. 710111INO JULIE K.WILLIAMSON MARK 7. JOHNSON 0110OKS F. POLEY PATRICIA I. RCDINO JULIE W. SCHNELL TIMOTHY R. DUNCAN MICHELE M. DAN) ELSON JOSEPH C. NAUMAN DANIEL C. DECK ERIC J. NYSTROM DRIAN J. KLEIN KRISTIN L.Pr1CRSON JOANNE. L. MATZEN DANIEL P.Of STEOAL TELECOPY 16121292.9347 The City Council recently questioned the validity restrictions n a business' hours or days of operation in two specific circumstances. First, the Council asked whether it can place such a limitation on a conditional use previously approved without any time restriction. The second case involves restricting a business operation as a condition to approving a zoning application such as a planned unit development. In brief, this issue Is unsettled and each case wi 1 turn on the particular facts involved. We believe, however, that reasonable regulation of hours of operation will be upheld, under either the city's zoning authority or general police power so long as the city (i) applies the restrictions consistently to all similar uses and (11) bases the restrictions on actual evidence of adverse effects which will result if the restrictions are not imposed. There are several principles which the Council can use deliberations. Statutory Provisions: Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 462.359(1), a municipality: to guide Its may by ordinance designate certain types of developments, In luding planned unit development, and certain land development activities as conditional uses under zoning regulations. Conditional uses may be approved by the governing body or other designated authority by a showing by the applicant that the standards and criteria stated in the ordinance will be satisfied. The standards and criteria shall include both general requirements for all condi Ional uses, and insofar as practicable, requirements specific to each designated c nditional use. Mr. Kevin Frazell January 17, 1989 Page Two While nothing In the above statutory provision expressly pr vides for the regulation of hours of operation, Minn. -Stat. § 394.301, which governscounty zoning, specifically states that: (iln connection- with ordering the issuance of a conditional use permit the designated approval authority may impose such additional restrictions or conditions as •'it deems necessary to protect the public interest Including but not limited to, matters relating to appearance, lighting, hours o operation and performance characteristics. (emphasis added) One could argue that because the municipal zoning statute lack the expressed language empowering counties to limit hours of operation that municipalities have no such right. }-However, a more reasonable argument is that the cou ty language is meant to be merely illustrative and such a restriction is equally ap)licable in the context of muncipal -regulation. Potential Challenges to Time Limitations on a Zoning Applicant: An attempt to impose time restrictions on prospective land us s, including a planned unit development, is vulunerable to attack. on two fronts. Fi st, neighboring property owners may contend that the proposed use itself is impermissible and thus should not be approved, notwithstanding any restriction on the business' hours or days of operation. Admittedly, a municipality cannot attempt to legitimate a use prohibited by the terms of the zoning ordinance by imposing timing restrictions on the proposed land use. Nonetheless, presuming the proposed use Is allowed within the underlying zoning district and the subject ordinance provides for conditional approval, a time restriction may be upheld as a proper exercise at the governing body's discretion. On a different front, a zoning applicant threatened with a time restriction is likely to claim that the limitation is improper because it goes to thE details of the business itself and not the property's. uses, therefore failing outside tl a scope of the muncipality's zoning authority. Admittedly, this argument has enjoyed some success. However, time restrictions have been upheld where the condition reasonable and appropriate to the promotion of the zoning purpose of public health, safety and welfare. Critical to such a finding Is the C of actual evidence that the proposed uses would have certain adver Increased crime, traffic or noise, which will be negated or dei proposed time limitation. As an additional part of this threshold determination of rea, courts are likely to consider- whether the same or similar uses elsewhere without such restrictions. To avoid claims of arbitrarl treatment, uses within specific zoning districts and uses creating cot should be treated similarly. Is found to be protecting the ,uncil's receipt effects, e.g. eased by the nableness, the are permitted ess or unequal parable effects Mr. Kevin Frazell January 17, 1989 Page Three Potential Chal to Time Limitations on Existing Businesses: (Police Existing businesses may continue to operate under their p evious zoning approvals as a matter of right, presuming • the use has satisfied and continues to comply with Its requisite conditions. As an alternative means to create time restrictions, a municipality may use its general police power to reg late business' general operations. However, as before, any such regulation must be shown to be (1) necessary given the existing circumstances and (ii) reasonably related to public health, safety and welfare if the regulation Is to be upheld. It is difficult to specify what evidence needs to be gathered lo support any city action restricting hours of operation. However, common sense may provide at least a guideline. For instance, an in house study by city staff, however thoroughly prepared, will not, be as effective in court as a study by a respective Independent consultant. Conclusion: Imposing restrictions on the hours or days of a business' t condition of zoning approval are not necessarily improper. However may not be used to allow uses which are prohibited by existing zoni placed on permitted uses only if they are consistently applied to si they reasonably relate to the regulation of factually substantiated ; created by the use. In addition, a municipality's zoning authority previously approved land uses, and therefore the municipality mt general police power, to regulate existing businesses. Once ag regulation must be reasonably based under the particular circumstance., If you have questions or wish us to provide legal authority please do not hesitate to contact us. SIncerely yours, WINTIIROP & VEINSTI E nas M. Hart {f Lloyd i . Grooms LWG:cab eration as a the condition g and may be ilar uses and (verse effects iay not reach t employ its A any such the above, 4 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEVIN D Z LI`- CITY ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR LEASE EXTENSION ON OLD FIRE STATION DATE: March 17, 1989 Council previously directed Staff to notify the current tenants of the old fire station, Thomas Weinzettel, Sr. Harry A. Kirchner, that the leases would be terminated effective March 31, 1989. Council further directed that Staff proceed with plans to demolish the old station. ity Attached are letters which Mayor Mertensotto has received from Mr. Weinzettel and Mr. Kirchner, requesting an extension of the lease through June 1, 1989. Apparently, both feel that they would have a great deal of difficulty in relocating their personal property at this time. ACTION REQUIRED To decide whether to grant the requested lease extensi and if so, pass a motion accordingly. KDF:jak Attachments i FISCHER'S GAS & TOWING 2150 Dodd Road Mendota [Its., MN 55120 454-2431 - 454-3187 March 13, 1989 I The Honorable Mayor Charles E. Mertensotto and City Council City of Mendota Heights c/o 2371 Rogers Avenue Ne-ndatil Itaigtits, 1-114 55120, Dear Mayor Mertensotto and Council Members: I respectfully request a two-month extension of time to June 1, 1989 to vacate rental space at 2144 Dodd Road. I I have been unable to locate suitable space which would be availabl prior to that date. I Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, *6 ta �rr Kirchner dba Fiseber's Gas & Towine Mendota Heights f4ndscape and tree SerWce 2140 Dodd Road Mendota Heights, MN 55120 R. J. Weinzettel 454.4659 09 March 1989 The Honorable Charles Mertensotto and The City Council of Mendota Heights c/o 2371 Rogers Avenue Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 Your Honor and Council Members, We sincerely appreciate the generous time frame allotted u our rented facility at 2144 Dodd Road, i.e. the original We wish at this time, however, to ask your forbearance of deadline and to have an extension to June 1, 1989, graciou by you. ; to vacate ?ire Station. ;he April 1 ;ly approved Due to inclement weather and the general nature of the sea on, it proves a hardship to our business to vacate the premises br April 1,1989. Much of our machinery and equipment cannot be reasonable s ld at fair market value during these winter months; a late sprin /early summer season proves more feasible for potential buyers anI liquidation. Since Mendota Heights Landscape and Tree Service has been owned, operated and integral business in Mendota Heights s early 1950s, we feel we are justified in requesting this n extension to June 01, 1989. Sincerely, Thomas Weinzettel, Sr. Mendota Heights Landscape and Tree Service TW/law family nce the cessary MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEVINCITY ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: Potential Participation in Local Government of Airport Relocation Issue DATE: March 13, 1989 udy ,3 Council has previously received copies of the report fr m'the Metropolitan Council on the long range adequacy of MSP 11 International Airport. Councilmember Buzz Cummins served .-on the Committee which recommended the dual track approach of expanding MSP at its current site, while at the same time "landbanking" for a new airport sometime in the future. The cities of Bloomington and Richfield are quite concerned about the issue of airport adequacy, and feel that previous studies by the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commission were deficient in addressing all of the implications of airport relocation. Needless to say, they are particularly concerned about the economic loss to their communities if the airport were to be relocated. They point out the inconsistencies between the Metropolitan Council. and Metropolitan Airports Commissions studies, one of which indicates that MSP will be inadequate for the region by the year 2000, while the other indicates that it will be adequate. Bloomington and Richfield have proposed to hire a consulting firm to perform a third study, which in part would be a " analysis of the previous two studies. It would also go on to look at some of the issues which the two cities feel are deficiencies in the Metropolitan Council's Adequacy Task Force Report. I was recently invited to attend a meeting of City Manac from other communities surrounding the airport to discus these concerns and the potential study. Mayor Mertensoi has also attended a meeting of the mayors of those same cities. We are now being asked whether we would consider participating in the study. Bloomington and Richfield vers os I :to Page Two estimate the cost at $100,000, and of course, would lik of the other cities to help pick up the cost. More importantly, however, they feel that having more commun participate will increase the credibility and political of the study and its results. Attached is the RFP which has been sent out by the two communities. Other cities which choose to participate be represented on a project panel to work with the consultant. ACTION REQUIRED To consider whether we wish to participate in this st if so, what type of a financial contribution we would willing to make. Attachment /j ak some t'" ties clout ill hand 5� T V, f } City Of t bloomington, minnesota Municipal Building • 2215 West Old Shakopee Road • Bloomington, Minnesota 55431-3096 • (612) 881-5811 February 27, 1989 Mr. Kevin Frazell, Administrator City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive St. Paul, MN 55120 Dear Kevin: Enclosed is the most recent draft of a request for proposal for all Airport Adequacy Study and a report on the airport prepared for thf and Urban Government Committee. 1 7 ' f } P h t i• alternate Senate Local t As explained at our February 22 meeting, the request for proposals seeks an expert panel to examine MAC's MSP 2000+ Study and the Metropolitan Council's report of the Airport Adequacy Study Advisory Task Force and repor on: 4 --Reasons why MAC and Metropolitan C'ouncil's aircraft�. traffic forecasts do not agree k --Capability of MSP Airport to accommodate additiona t traffic and alternate means of increasing the }: airport's capacity --Economic impact of relocating airport t• --Impacts vs benefits of the proposed new north - south runway Y --Impact of creating an additional metro area growth i center adjacent to a new airport Please review the study proposal with your staff and Council by mid-March if possible. I would appreciate a telephone call or letter to inform me of your Council's action. Please contact me if you have questions about t e.request proposals. 4. Sincer �y, t rry Lee Director of Community Development /k enclosures AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION/EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Telecommunications Device for the Deaf- (612) 887-9677 for DRAFT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Adequacy of the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport February 3, 1989 Request for Proposal MSP InternationalAirport Adequacy Study e ruary 3, 989 BACKGROUND Two regional agencies, the Metropolitan Airports Commission Metropolitan Council, are currently involved in examination of at for international airport facility needs for the Minneapolis - Minnesota region. The Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC),*a regional agency c Commissioners appointed by the Governor, is responsible for the and management of all public airport facilities in the seven -cot politan area, -including Minneapolis - St. Paul (MSP) Internationi located at Wold'Chamberlain Field. MAC began an* update of its Master Plan for MSP International • 1985. After an initial work phase which included facility inn activity forecasts, the work was halted by MAC because of t merger of Northwest Airlines and Republic Airlines. In its 1987 Session, the Minnesota Legislature directed that s ability of MSP to serve the future air travel needs. of the Twin proceed on two fronts. The Metropolitan Council was directed the long-term (Year 2020) need. The Metropolitan Airports Com directed to determine airport needs over the next ten years Both studies were to be completed at the end of 1988. i and the d planning St. Paul, i_ K erected by operation my metro - .1 Airport, Airport in entory and ie' pending udy of the A ties area to examine ission was ear 1998). The City of Bloomington and the City of Richfield have joined together to conduct this third study of MSP Airport because of common concerii regarding the future of the.airport at this site. The Cities have three major con- cerns: • Relocation of the existing airport will result in loss of for economic growth for existing and future commercial businesses in the communities. • The impacts and benefits of the North-South runway alte not been fully addressed. pportunity id service d ative have • The impact on the metropolitan area of creating an additi nal growth center around a new airport have not been addressed. i ti> a Request for Proposal P International Airport Adequacy Study February 3, 1989 f,�qe2 Metropolitan Council Study The Metropolitan Council's study!/ examined Twin Cities airport needs over a thirty-year period. The analysis found that the existing airport faci- lity would not adequately serve the demand expected during.th t�period. The Metropolitan Council's study also examined the question of h wlong the existing airport 'could accommodate expected demand and concluded * one uded. that existing airport facilities will not satisfy the level of demand 'expected to occur at MSP by the Year 2000. The study found that to meet Year 2000 demand at MSP, an additional (fourth) runway is needed. To mee Year 2020 demand, construction of another (fifth) runway would be requ red. The study concluded that. the only al ternati ve *means of meeting futur demand is construction of -a new international airport. The Metropolitan Council study emphasized the potential negative effects associated with having inadequate airport facilities.' The st dy pointed out the possibility that demand not served at MSP Airport woul be likely to, relocate to another city, and would probably not move back lo the Twin Cities even if airport facilities were later expanded. As a result of this study, the Metropolitan Council has dete lned that planning for future airport needs should proceed on two tracks. • Capacity of the existing airport -should be maximized. • Planning for a new airport should begin immediately, including site selection and landbanking. The Metropolitan Council recommended the -two-track approach tecause the process required to site, plan, construct and place a new airport in opera- tion is very long and complex. If the process is not begun now, there is a real chance that the region could suffer severe economic los resulting from the lack of adequate air transportation facilities. Metropolitan Airports Commission Study r MAC's study/, as directed by the Legislature, focussed on horizon. MSP 2000+ addressed airport capacity from the sta 11 Is the Airport Adequate? Report of the Minneapoli I5ferna--f-iona"t'Airport dequacy Study Advisory Task Foi Metropolitan Council, October 1988. 2/ MSP 2000+, Airport Master - Plan Update, Metropolita Commission, December 1988. a .ten-year ]points of } ;/St. Paul ce to the ;Airports .Y Request for Proposal MSP International Airport Adequacy Study February 3, 989 age 3 - airside capacity (runways, taxiways, apron space), terming capacity (gates, baggage handling, ticketing, queuing space, waiting space), and landside capacity (curbside loading/unloading, parking, public transpor- tation, traffic flow, access via the regional highway system). z The study found that air traffic expected in the Year 2000 wo Id require airport facilities improvements in several areas: • Airside: Runway 4-22 extension, and taxiway and apron improvements. • Terminal: additional gates, baggage handling space and ticketing space. • Landside: additional curbside. space and parking capacity, upgrading .of public transportation facilities, reconstruction of to minal area roadways to serve new terminal facilities. ". MSP 2000+ found that air traffic expected to occur in the Year 21000 can be adequately served by existing* runways. This conclusion represents the basic difference between the Metropolitan Council's Airport Ade uacy Study and the Metropolitan Airports Commission's MSP 2000+ Master Plan Update. MAC Commissioners have adopted the position that the two-tracc strategy proposed by the Metropolitan Council is the most reasonable a proach to planning for future airport needs. The Commission also agreed to conduct an analysis of the need for and the feasibility of a new North-South run- way. STUDY OBJECTIVE The Metropolitan Council and -the Metropolitan Airports Commission, analyzed the same airport using the same base data and the same basic for casts, yet came to different conclusions regarding the ability of MSP airport to serve air traffic volumes expected in the Year 2000 and the nature of airside improvements necessary to serve expected air traffic. - The objective of this study is to review the work of both agenci s; supple- ment the work completed to date with additional analysis where necessary, and develop conclusions regarding: e • Volume and mix of air traffic which will use MSP Airport during the forecast period. • Capability of MSP Airport to accommodate that traffic and alt.ernative means of enhancing the airport's capacity. Request for Proposal RTFI—nternational Airport Adequacy Study Te -Er uary , 9 9 Page 4 • Economic impact of.relocation of the existing airport on oppc for economic growth by existing and future commercial an businesses in Bloomington and Richfield. 4 r• rtunities i';service • Interaction between the Twin Cities region and other regions with respect to demand for air travel and the ability of each region to accommodate that demand. • The economic and environmental impacts and benefits of the N rth-South runway alternative on the communities, • The impact of creating an additional growth center around a new air- port. 4. 'l• • Recommendations for Legislative and/or agency actions related to meeting future air travel- needs in the Twin Cities market. When the results of the analysis conducted in this study differ substan- tially from the results of the Metropolitan Council stud nor the Metropolitan Airports Commission study, the Consultant team will be expected to identify alternative assumptions, data sources, analy is metho- dologies, or resources which support the team's conclusions. STUDY METHODOLOGY A The question of the adequacy of MSP Airport and the alternatives available for expanding its capacity have been analyzed by two independen and com- petent agencies and their consultants. The analyses reached different conclusions. In order to achieve credibility, an additional analysis must mobilize recognized expertise. Expert Panel' t. E This study will utilize an' Expert Panel composed of knowledg able and recognized experts in each of the relevant areas of interest in`airport planning. The panel is expected to include experts in the areas f: • Airline Industry Economics e Air Travel Forecasts • Airfield Capacity Airfield Design Terminal Capacity • Terminal Design • Landside Capacity • Landside Design • Aircraft Noise A n r Request for Proposal MSP International Airport Adequacy Study February 3, 989 age 5 e Land Use Planning and Development • Urban Economics • Airport Infrastructure Capacity • Airport Infrastructure Design The Expert Panel.wi11 include recognized and government, from acade Individual team members more than one area, an will include about five -will be expected to co area of special expert airline business who r be assembled by the project leader. The respected experts from the airline indu mic institutions, and/or from the consult] are likely to possess significant exp( d it is therefore expected that proposes to six members. Each member of the pro ntribute to the analysis both within the ise, and .as a seasoned observer of the ecognizes the interrelationships among al' expertise. f )anel will try, from ng field. rience in ,'s panels )osed team member's :ommercial Areas of Even though the Metropolitan Counci.l and the Metropolitan Airports Commission have each conducted. extensive analysis of the air ort, this., study is not expected to merely review and comment on those ana yses. It is expected that this analysis will uncover as yet unused base d to and/or modify or refine previous work in ways which may influence the utcome of_ the analysis. It is anticipated that the issues, scope -the analysis required to i sis methodologies, Metropolitan Council sideration. Study Management a panel of experts will bring a fresh pers' analysis to .crucial issues, formulate and e' dentify and support alternative assumptions and document those findings for referra and the Metropolitan Airports Commission A key factor in execution o dination of the panel of experts are fully capable their areas of expertise, t dination of those efforts, f preparation and distribute client representatives. WORK PROGRAM f. this project will be experts and other st of carrying out the he project leader will or facilitating the i on of study products, the management udy resources. analysis requir be responsible nteraction of exp and for inter ective to ecute the or analy- to the for con - and coor- Although ad within for coor- erts, for Face with The work program consists of six tasks. The study will empha ize iden- tification of pivotal issues, reduction df scope, and focused analysis. Request for Proposal MSP International Airport Adequacy Study February , age 6 Task 1 - Review Available Data The client will provide the consultant team all available i. related to key study issues, including analyses prepared Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commission. sultant will review this data as well as any other relevan .available to the team. Although detailed review of the work previously, conducte, Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commission is collection of data from primary sources and independent analyse. damental aspects of the project. r iformation ,by the The -.con- t :studies i' ,by the expected, are fun - If the consultant team requires any additional information to c nduct the study; those needs will be referred to the client. The client wi 1 provide that information to -the extent possible. Task 2 - Identify Key Issues - Expert Panel The number of issues which have been raised during the execution f studies by the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Airports Com fission is large and wide ranging. It is likely that those issues could be educed in number in a scoping process whi.ch would bring the study to focus on those issues which most strongly influence the conclusion regarding ai port ade- quacy. The responsible expert in each issue area will evaluate avails le infor- mation regarding that issue, and conduct additional research and analysis, if required. An issue description paper will be prepared which describes the issue, available related data and analysis conducted to d te. The paper will present a recommendation to the Client as to whether that issue should be considered a pivotal issue and studied in detail. Issue description papers will be submitted to the client. The c ient will reproduce and distribute the papers to all panel members for review. The Expert Panel will convene for its first meeting when all recommen- dations have been circulated and reviewed by all other expert 'and the Client. The first meeting will: i o Select the pivotal issues from among the universe of issues riginally identified. o Set parameters for in-depth analysis. Request for Proposal MSP International Airport Adequacy Study February 3, 1989 age It is anticipated that a maximum of five pivotal issues will I e,selected for detailed analysis. Task 3 - Prepare Issue Analysis Papers I , Pivotal issues will be subjected to detailed analysis. Issu analysis papers will describe base assumptions and data, and analysis methodology and alternatives. The analysis will be carried to the point where clear and relevant differences between this analysis and that conduced by the Metropolitan Council or the Metropolitan Airports Commission are iden- tifiable and supportable. Analyses will be thoroughly documen ed. Each issue paper will include discussion of -any differences between its conclu- sions and those of previous analyses. Issue papers will be submitted to the. client. The client will reproduce and distribute the papers to all panel members for review and coniment. Task 4 - Review Analysis Each issue paper will be critically reviewed by all panel members. Through the project leader, panel members will work toward consensus regarding the appropriateness and consistency of the assumptions, proceduresand conclu- sions contained in each'paper. Panel members will identify any refined or additional analysi required prior to reaching conclusions. Task 5 - Refine Analysis and Formulate Conclusions Panel members will conduct any refined or additional analysis required. Each panel member will then prepare a draft of findings and conclusions which reflects the expert's perspective. Draft findings and conclusions will be submitted to the client, he client will reproduce and distribute the draft findings and conclusins to all panel members for review and comment prior to the panel meeting. Task 6 - Expert Panel: Conclusions and Report At the panel meeting, members will draft findings and conclusi ns regar- ding: • Volume and mix of air traffic which will use MSP Airport uring the forecast period. Request for Proposal MSP International Airport Adequacy Study k; February 3, 989 �e 8 4. x. r, Capability of MSP Airport to accommodate that traffic and alternative means of enhancing the airport's capacity. `1 a Economic impact of relocation of the existing airport on opportunities for economic' growth by existing and" future commercial an J .service businesses in the communities. Interaction• between the Twin Cities region and other regions with respect to 'demand for air travel and the ability of each region to accommodate.that demand. The economic and environmental impacts and benefits of the N rth-South runway alternative on the communities. • The impact of creating an additional growth center around a new air- port. • Recommendations for Legislative and/or agency actions r lated to meeting future air travel needs in the Twin Cities market. When consensus is reached, the Consultant will prepare a report wich docu- ments the study process and findings and conclusions. The consultant will provide camera-ready copy of the report to for printing and distribution. PRODUCTS The Consultant will produce papers at three points: a Issue Description Papers - For review and discussion by t order to identify key issues for detailed analysis. • Issue Analysis Papers - In-depth analysis of key issues. he client panel in ie • Report - Full documentation of process, findings and recomme dations. SCHEDULE The project is to be completed within six months of authori proceed. The study is expected to conform to the schedule listed • February 7, 1989 Request for proposals issued. !ation to below. AV 10 Request for Proposal MSP International frport Adequacy Study February 3, 989 Page 9 • February 16, 1989 Prepropasal Conference 2:00 P.M., C.S.T. Council Chambers Richfield City Hall 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, Minnesota' • March 6, 1989 Deadline for receipt of proposals. • March 21, 1989 Interview selected.consultant teams. • March 24, 1989 Consultant selected. April 3, 1989 Authorization to proceed issued. • June 1, 1989 Task 2 complete; Expert Panel- meets. e September 1, 1989 Task 5 complete; Expert Panel meets conclusions and recommendations. • October 1, 1989 Report issued, study complete. BUDGET review The budget established to fund all consultant services and expenses is $100,000.00. PROJECT MANAGEMENT The project will be managed by a representative of the City of Bloomington and a representative of the City of Richfield. PROPOSAL CONTENTS The .proposal will identify all members of the expert panel, and present their qualifications. The proposal should specifically describe tow and by whom the project will be managed. Proposals will be a maximum of thirty pages in length. r Request for Proposal MSP InternationalAirport Adequacy Study February 3, 9 9 age 10 ' EVALUATION CRITERIA Two principal criteria will be used to evaluate proposals to con uct this project: • Level of experience and expertise represented by members of tie expert panel. • Method proposed to manage and coordinate the work of the expert panel. riE1 brl • LOISS 111,11 LS let• NITS.111.11, s1r•31maliv '3u! NOLLVI3OSSV SNINCIV SNOILVDINAM03 1.S3M sn i I 2.9croLiFI INI I T, • 0-1 ir -21 • • 0 / / //I / / [;] 4 a. • Li _- DRAWN BY; 'Wad i 0 0 .y -.- 5 z 1- ln w ROBINSON 4 U PAGNOTTA 4 1 - J3)401O113S wnle it LI z 0 � y W W c z w b vT w 0,3 Y a 0 0 m 4 J EES SCHOMAKER U) O M 133H1S 13 VO N VA ;Atl 4010 sa F bi - 00 D i un W a l rasa t O r 3 9 • lc 0— Do Nit O O O O get 0 >a sul t t3 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 its )1308/13AV89 • snomominG • 1- 0 MINNESOTA p 0 047. X 0 0 Existing or Under Construction 1MIOd • a. } E ` b b e € 4 g 8 g s a 3 d chi C J ci 0 a LL a. ccU Z W `0 V C c 0 y (0 O (7 a= v c .c u) : c a o C U y E�, c (Q O aU y T O :9 i m rn y c C 2 O y c L c 0 O U O w v a w N w12 CO 0C 0 .c (I) 1 • - INDEX TO DRAWINGS TITLE OF SHEET SHEET No. r W JW wU U 1-cr U U U 0 D0 CD (7 cr Q a c� a m= Q = =»U pew 1- 1300 UpJw � O z w �Q Q Z o 2 < U 0 (1- Q_ O wCrti Id 0 No IL Z w Q f-1 O w K = I w u5 CT O U U W H cc UjO °'3 3 i 6 t ww w w w I- 0 - c�=cn U w J Q F- 1= w Q a FO- cr Fp- N fn d' t (0 Ln 0 F- c! 0 0 J r-� >- E- -J J J :0 � V Y Z O O W 2 I- CJ G MCZ 00 W I- Z G 0 C v 0 L.L. W CC 0 W W C3 a cr y2- a� � I N N N N 0. Cn CtCt N 1 I int 00 N O 4 N N [T 1D uP o, 0 0 <2- 1 c Y N (n uP C a r M C O N V In W .) 0 C ,- . .- C I --- CG C C CD W m 0 CL � N 1 4-1 N L r- of Y CD Vr Cl) 0 1] C.7 WOG Z 3 3 Nm 4- e0 Z F- O.--. O +-+ U .- d co c L O! oaO W W Wea 0) N N !•+ r0 W C Z C to L C .-. . m Ci to r0 L 3 Cu C C7 '> Z > Y v C [1 (4 0. C Z C) C>_ W S- V) N L L O'er W N r 1J iJ L (n ( C L L Y C C 0 n F L O O 1n OW C 1- 2Tr_ N Z2_, -G0 F-- -CC C G Cn dJ •• 3 W W .,- 1- •• W = N O Z J v O H J G G O ` C 2 G H- I -a. We CD D0 U W J CD CD (n W J CO • Z Z G _J W Q H W W C7 W H Li N i f L(0 •- •••- •,•-• .- C N 3 0(5) 4 > 0 N > O y N G0 C + L O. - 4.•W OO Z Z _N W a o HYDRANTS N 0 0) STREET &A B6I8 C. EA G. - TUMINOUS d y ca cca T a` N (D Q E W a 0 L L 1- T 1-� 0 U CITY ENGINEER 0 c Q H CC0 W w 4- Approved by the Mendota Heights City Council SANITARY AND WATERMAIN 0 Q 2 U O Cr 0 1- w W 1- co STORMSEWER o W H a 3 tie 0 W v) MP.88 PROJ.04