The URL can be used to link to this page

1989-03-07CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA MARCH 7, 1989 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Agenda Adop ion.- rj?A-� 4. Approval of February 21 Minutes. 5. Consent Calendar:1A a. b. C. d. Recommendation for City Mileage Increase Publication of Summary of Rubbish Hauling Ordinance Dog Litter Signs Acknowledgment of Planning Commission Minutes of February 28 - t Public hearing comments re:MAC Runway 422 Extension Acknowledgment of February Code Enforcement Report Fire Department February Report Approval of the List of Licenses Approval of Rubbish Haulers Licenses Approval of List of Claims Appointment of Temporary Engineering Department Employee End of Consent Calendar. 6. Introductions. -- 7. Public Comments. 8. Unfinished and New Business. a. CASE NO. 89-04, Sutmer Side Yard Variance b. CASE NO. 89-07, Tilsen/Schae er Su division (RESOLUTION NO. 89-18) c. CASE NO. 89-08, Kuross Subdivi 'o . (RESOLUTION NO. 89-19) - ;^ * d. U.dS. Wst QPP P m't Report (RESOLUTION NO. 89�-20) e. Discussion of Nott west Orien Campus Development in Eagan, Including Traffic Implications - John Shardlow, Planning Consultant to Northwest - Tom Colbert, Eagan Public Works Director * f. Freedom of Information Request Re: MSP Airc of ' Flight Corridor (RESOLUTION NO. 89-21)— . g A 9 g. Resolution regarding 1989 Recycling�eimburse ent Policies (RESOLUTION NO. 89-22) & . h. Volunteer Fire Department Community Sere Award Nomination (RESOLUTION NO. 89-23) vipS i. Recommendation for appointment of Senior Secretary j. Recommendation for appointment of Police officer k. P arming Com 'ssiQn Resignation r� o 1. MA,P,C R r sent ides !� 9 . Response to Council C ment C. J. Homes Contractor License 10. Council Comments and Requests 11. Adj ourn f : p W> R }� MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS March 7,1 To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevin Fra , y Administrator Re: Add -On Agenda for March 7th One item for the Consent Calendar is recommended for a& to this evening's agenda, and new information is submitt for two items previously scheduled. 3. Agenda Adoption It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda printed on pink paper. 5.k. Appointment of Temporary Engineering Department Employee Please see attached memo from Engineer Klayton Eckles. 8.d. U.S. West CUP Permit for Essential Service 1989 Ltion Attached is a proposed site plan for the requested esserhtial service structure building. These plans were submitted on behalf of Centex Corporation, and two alternative locations are suggested. It is requested that Council approve both alternatives, so as to provide latitude as we go about planning for development of this park. A resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit is al o attached. Ken Dallman of U.S. West and Dick Putnam representing C will be present for the discussion. 8.f. FOI Request Regarding Flight Corridor The first BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED clause in the previousLy submitted resolution inaccurately states our position with regard to the corridor. It is recommended that the resolution be adopted with this clause amended to read as follows: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, that the Council wishes the 1115 decree" Operations Cone for the Corridor to be maintained with turns to the left of no more than 10 degrees from the extended runway centerline. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO February TO: Mayor, City Council and Cii strator FROM: Klayton H. Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Hiring a Temporary Civil Engineer DISCUSSION: As has been standard practice in recent years, the ing department has hired temporary engineers and technic' year to absorb some of the work loads in the busy constr season. Staff recently conducted interviews for the advert position of "Temporary Engineer or Technician". Twenty - applications were received. Interviews were held on We February 22, 1989 and staff picked Steven Bradach as the candidate. Steve is a recent Civil Engineering graduate Dakota State University and has experience with an engin consulting firm. 8, 1989 gineer- ns each tion sed ix nesday, best of North ering Steve would accept a temporary position (6-12 mont s) with the City with a starting hourly rate of $9.50 per hour nd no benefits. All salary costs could be charged off to projects. RECOMMENDATION: ,Staff recommends Council approve the hiring of Ste as a temporary engineer for a period of 6 to 12 months. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council agrees with Staff's recommendation, C pass a motion approving the hiring of Steven Bradach. KHE:dfw Bradach it should CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89-20 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY WHEREAS, Northwestern Bell Telephone Company has for a Conditional Use Permit to construct an equipment building on the northerly section of the Centex Plan C and lied rk; WHEREAS, the property for which said application f r a conditional use permit has been filed is classified as "R- lA" One Family Rdsidential District under the City Zoni g Ordinance: and ' WHEREAS, the application for said conditional use ermit has been duly considered by the City Planning Commissio and the Planning Commission has recommended the approval of said conditional use permit, and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public heari g on said application as required under the provisions of thCity Zoning Ordinance; and le WHEREAS, Council determined that to avoid disruptiing the view to a wetland the optimum location for the buildin� would be within the area of the Centex Park as shown on a dr wing prepared by Centex Homes and dated March 2, 1989; and. WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the above-described property would be suitable for an esse tial service building and would not create a nuisance or be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the immediate neighborhood or the community in general; and that the proposed use would not create any traffic congestion o hazards greater than would be the case if the site wer used ,for single family residential development; and that th proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose an intent of the City's Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensiv Plan. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: The application of Northwestern Bell Telephone Coi for a Conditional Use Permit to -construct an essential for a Conditional Use Permit to construct an essential service buildin4 within the C nt x P k is her by ppro subject to the following: 1 j (to be determined by Council) EN Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota HeigY is this 7th day of March, 1989. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By ATTEST: .R Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk Charles E. Mertens Mayor , " mrk- '�'/lt 1� I y CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA MARCH 7, 1989 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Agenda Adoption. 4. Approval of February 21 Minutes. 5. Consent Calendar: a. Recommendation for City Mileage Increase b. Publication of Summary of Rubbish Hauling Ord C. Dog Litter Signs d. Acknowledgment of Planning Commission Minutes February 28 e. Public hearing comments re:MAC Runway 422 Ext f. Acknowledgment of February Code Enforcement R g. Fire Department February Report h. Approval of the List of Licenses i. Approval of Rubbish Haulers Licenses Approve j t of Claims Ind o Consent Calefida 6. Introductions. 7. Public Comments. 8. Unfinished and New Business. a. CASE NO. 89-04, Sutmer Side Yard Variance b. CASE NO. 89-07, Tilsen/Schaefer Subdivision (RESOLUTION NO. 89-18) c. CASE NO. 89-08, Kuross Subdivision (RESOLUTION NO. 89-19) d. e. 't(c f. 9. ce on U. S esemit Report (RESOLUTION NO. 8�-20) Discussion of Northwest Orient Campus Developme Eagan, Including Traffic Implications - John Shardlow, Planning Consultant to Northw - Tom Colbert, Eagan Public Works Director Freedom of Information Request Re: MSP Aircraf Fligh CpMor (RESOLUTION NO. 89-21) Resolution regarding 1989 Recycling Reimburseme Policies (RESOLUTION NO. 89-22) 14 in -1� h. Volunteer Fire Department Community Service Award Nomination (RESOLUTION NO. 89-23) i. Recommendation for appointment of Senior Secretary j. Recommendation for appointment of Police Officer k. Planning Commission Resignation 1. MASAC ep esentativ� m. 9 . Response to ouncil Comments C. J. Homes Contractor License - ✓ 10. Council Comments and Requests 11. Adjourn 1 :3 Page No. 2475 February 21, 1989 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, February 21, 1989 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular me ting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotta called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmemers Blesener, Cummins, Hartmann and Witt. AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of the revised agenda for the meeting. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 `. Nays: 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Cummins moved ap roval of the minutes of the February 7th me ting with correction. Councilmember Blesener seconde the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Hartmann moved a proval of the consent calendar for the m eting along with authorization for executi n of any necessary documents contained herein. a. Acknowledgment of the Fire Department monthly report for January b. Adoption of Resolution No. "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGI REPORT, ORDERING IMPROVEME PREPARATION OF PLANS AND S FOR WATER, STORM SEWERS AN CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE LOST AND 7, BLOCK 4, AND LOTS 1 5, MENDOTA HEIGHTS INDUSTR (EXECUTIVE DRIVE) (IMPROVE PROJECT NO. 2). c. Designation of Diane Ward Clerk effective February d. Acknowledgment of a memo Shaughnessy regarding 198! financing. 89-13, EER'S T AND ECIFICATIONS STREET 3, 4, 5, b AND 2, BLOCK AL PARK ENT NO. 89, s Deputy , 1989. om Treasurer improvement Page No. 2476 February 21, 1989 e. Acknowledgment'of an update regarding upgrading of the ballfield. memo ity Hall f. Acknowledgment of a memo on 1989 summer recreation, along with auth rization of payment to Mend -Eagan Athletic Association of $15.00 per r gistrant for T -ball; authorization f r continuation of the contract with School District 197 to provide the art - in -the park program for 1989, and approval of the men's softball program without a coordinator but with minimal coordination services provided by the ,Engineering Secretary. g. Acknowledgment of a memo informing Council of certification of the City's Affirmative Action Plan an authorization for staff to implement the Plan. ' h. Acknowledgment of an updat on recruitment of a new polic officer. i. Approval of the list of Co tractor Licenses dated February 21 1989 and attached hereto. j. Approval of the issuance o a rubbish hauler license to BFI/Wood ake Sanitary Service, Inc. through March 31, 1989. k. Approval of the List of C1 ims dated February 21, 1989 and totalling $98,956.26. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 INTRODUCTION Mayor Mertensotto introduced M tropolitan Council District 15 representative Margaret Schreiner to the audience. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Floyd Laska, 2061 Patricia, read a written statement regarding aiport noise to the Council and audience. Dr. James Olin, 1140 Orchard Place, was also present to complain abouairport noise, stating that on one pa ticular 4 Page No. 2477 February 21, 1989 evening last summer 14 planes f home within 26 minutes and the deafening. He stated that the has all come in the last five o and suggested that pilots and a should be fined for each left t the runway. Councilmember Cummins responded Council does not have the power flight patterns but is trying t some of the flights over Eagan. stated that the Council is work Walter Rockenstein to try to ne the City of Eagan to get more f turn south and fewer north. He the audience that the Council h the City Attorney to pursue wha measures possible to get FAA co recognizing that the biggest pr with the FAA and its operationa IVY FALLS CREEK Council acknowledged the plans ADDITION IMPROVEMENTS specifications for proposed im serve the Ivy Falls Creek Addi north of First Avenue. Public Director Danielson stated that project includes an extension Lane to the east, which could homes outside of the plat area bridge over the creek to the S School property as deduct alte After discussion, Councilmembe moved adoption of Resolution N "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PL SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMP SERVE IVY FALLS CREEK ADDITION AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PRO Councilmember Blesener seconde Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 w over his ise was r traffic six years, lines n made off that to change deflect He further ng with otiate with fights to informed s directed eration, lem is practices. ovements to on located orks roposed Brookside fect 8 and a erset ates. Cummins . 89-15, NS AND OVEMENTS TO AND ADJACENT ECT NO. 2). the motion. HEARING - VAL'S Mayor Mertensotto opened the m eting for ADDITION IMPROVEMENTS the purpose of a public hearin on proposed improvements to serve the Val' Addition. Public Works Director Danielson informed Council that a petition and waiver of hearing has been executed by a 1 of the property owners proposed to be affected by the project. He briefly reviewed the project, and stated that the estimated cost Page No. 2478 February 21, 1989 for the improvements will result assessment of approximately $20, lot. Responding to Council que: stated that access to the Pastel will be by outlot, and that the owners have been notified of thi cost. Mayor Mertensotto asked for que; comments from the audience. Mr. Valdis Mikkelsons, one of t owners, felt that the notice of should have specifically named which will be assessed. Public Director Danielson responded th notice language`is statutory'an the ten newly created lots will assessed. There being no further question: Councilmember Cummins moved that hearing be closed at 8:05 P.M. Councilmember Witt seconded the Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CENTRE POINTE SOUTH Council acknowledged receipt of SIGNAGE from the Public Works Director signage policy for the Yorkton submitted by Yorkton ltd, along request for approval of a sign Centre Pointe Medical Clinic. in an 220 per ;tions, he property property estimated ions and e property hearing hose lots Works t the that only be the motion. a memo Lnd proposed ►ffice Park with a .or the Mayor Mertensotto informed the udience that Council had asked Yorkton o develop a uniform sign policy as the resu t of the request for sign permit from th medical clinic. Councilmember Blesener noted th information submitted to Counci include anything on the design for the medical clinic. She fe 25 foot height maximum proposed Yorkton policy is a problem and policy is approved there could 15 signs of that height in the She stated that she could appro proposed policy if the first op minimum width by 12 foot maximu sign area and 25 foot tall colu deleted. t the did not f the sign t that the in the that if the nd up to be ffice park. e the ion, 4 foot height ns. were Page No. 2479 February 21, 1989 Public Works Director Danielson the zoning code allows a maximus of 50 square feet and a maximum 25 feet. stated that t sign area height of Mayor Mertensotto stated that h could agree with the first option for multiple signage, as a common sign for offices in the park, but not for each building in the park. A representative of Yorkton, pr the discussion, stated that the clinic had presented a request foot high sign, 7 feet wide, wi square foot sign area, and that been trying to get the clinic t sign size. Responding to a question from C Blesener regarding the United P sign policy, Mr. Dale Glowa, wh present in the audience, stated United Properties monument sign foot tall cornerstones on top o one-half foot base, and are 5 t wide. Councilmember Blesener felt tha foot sign, 15 feet high, is an large sign for the medical cent suggested that the Yorkton repr should take another look at the signs it proposes in its policy back with designs more in scale sizes of the buildings. Mayor Mertensotto noted that Cei South is not a very large deve14 Council is concerned that, acco: proposed sign policy, there cou: foot high sign in front of each He pointed out that what Counci: is that one monument -type sign : total development would be appri felt that the total development a sign policy that would be more and suggested that the Yorkton representative come back with a which scales the sign size down height and width. sent for medical or a 15 h a 50 Yorkton has reduce the uncilmember operties was that the have 14 a two and 7 feet a 7 by 7 wfully r. She sentative ranges of and come with the etre Pointe )pment and -ding to the .d be a 25 building. is saying .or the >priate. He could have compact, sign policy both in Page No. 2480 February 21, 1989 Councilmember Cummins felt that does not need to approve a sign since it must approve each indi Councilmember Blesener stated square feet,of sign surface is be put in front of each buildi she would rather see a six foo height and 8 foot maximum widt monument type sign for the dev whole. Council policy iidual sign. at 50 oo big to and that maximum as a opment as a Councilmember Witt agreed, and felt that the second option in the polic , 4 by 7 foot sign area maximum would b more acceptable. Mayor Mertensotto suggested that Yorkton revise the proposed policy to scale down the sign sizes as well as proposing a smaller sign for the medical Center. Councilmember Cummins moved that the medical center sign permit request be tabled to such time as a new permit application is submitted. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays:0 HEARING - NORTH IVY Mayor Mertensotto opened the m eting for HILLS 2ND ADDITION the purpose of a public hearinj on IMPROVEMENTS proposed sanitary sewer, water ain, street and storm sewer improvements t serve the North Ivy Hills 2nd Addition aid adjacent areas. Public Works Director Danielso Council and the audience that proposed to install public imp serve the 10 lot subdivision 1 between T.H. 13 and Miriam. H it is proposed to assess all o sanitary sewer and watermain c subdivision. It is also props Miriam and Hiawatha be connect the cost of connecting the two streets be paid by the City's With regard to storm sewer, he the system is proposed to be e the subdivision to pick up wat drains'easterly from Miriam, a has been proposed that the prc informed 't is ovements to Gated e stated that f the osts to the sed that ed, and that dead-end general fund. stated that xtended from er that nd that it perty outside Page No. 2481 February 21, 1989 of the plat which drains to the l should be assessed. Mr. Danielson stated that the d North Ivy Hills 2nd Addition, V indicated that he would not be attend the hearing, and had ask storm sewer costs be divided so plat only pays for its costs an properties outside the plat be their costs. He stated that st recommending that the storm sew spread on an equal basis at an $0.15 per square foot of area c to the system. Mayor Mertensotto asked for comments from the audience. system veloper of rn Colon, ble to d that the that his the ssessed for ff is r costs be stimated ntributing tions and Mr. Lyal Hefflefinger, 569 Miriam, asked how many lots are going to be involved in the street connection. He stated that he feels that the properties outside of the =plat have enough storm sewer tc take care of their drainage and that his property is getting assessed for improvements to the new plat. Councilmember Blesener respondd that only the portion of Mr. Hefflefinge 's property that drains into the new storm sewer would be assessed. Mr. Jim Cascalenda, 568 Miriam it appears that his entire yar assessed, and he asked what th cost would be. He also asked Miriam/Hiawatha connection wou regardless of the new plat. Public Works Director Danielso the Cascalenda property will n assessed for street, and that Colon property developed and i were needed, storm sewer would installed to serve the adjoini With respect to the street col Councilmember Blesener stated connection of the two dead -enc intended and that Council wail action until development of t] property was proposed. stated that would be approximate hether the d be made stated that t be ntil the provements not be q area. ection, hat the streets was d for such Colon Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 248 February 21, 198 Responding to a Council questi n with regard to the potential inclusion of upgrading of Miriam and Simard streets in the project, Public Works Director Danielson stated letters had b en sent to the affected property owners ad 50% of them have responded that they ppose curb and gutter installation. There being no'further questions or comments from the audience, Co ncilmember Cummins moved that the hearing be closed at 8:35 P.M. Councilmember Hartmann secondet the motion. Councilmember Blesener moved a option of Resolution No. 89-14, "RESOLUT ON ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWERS, WATER, STORM SEWER AND STREET CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE NORTH IVY HILLS 2ND ADDITION AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO 88, PROJECT NO. 6).11 Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Responding to a request from M yor Mertensotto, Public Works Dire for Danielson stated that if the bids for the project result in any deviatioi in projected costs staff will notify those individuals whose property is roposed to be assessed. BIG WHEEL PERMIT Mr. Dale Glowa, from United Pr perties, was present to request approval of a building permit for the Big Wheel Auto orporate headquarters and warehouse pro osed to be constructed on Pilot Knob Road. Administrator Frazell informer Dakota County has approved th( Properties request for variant entrances on Pilot Knob subjer City's adoption of a resolutir accept the turn -back of Pilot He stated that the turn -back i until after*T.H. 13 is improv( the County wants an expressioi City's intent to request the 1 Council that United s for to the agreeing to nob Road. 11 not occur , but that of the rn-back. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 2483 February 21, 1989 There was discussion over poten improvements to Pilot Knob and methods of paying for those imp After discussion, Councilmember adoption of Resolution No. 89-1 "RESOLUTION AGREEING TO ACCEPT (PILOT KNOB ROAD) FROM DAKOTA C CONSTRUCTION OF TRUNK HIGHWAY 1 Councilmember Hartmann seconded Councilmember Witt moved adopt Resolution No. 89-17, "RESOLUT PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARAT FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR MENDOTA BUSINESS PARK ADDITION." Councilmember Hartmann seconde Councilmember Hartmann moved a - for execution of the developer for the Mendota Heights Busine Addition, approval of the issu building permit for the Big Wh Headquarters subject to review of the plans and specification and approval of a 20 foot vari sign setback requirement for i of a sign for Big Wheel, along of Planning Commission review variance application. Councilmember Witt seconded th Administrative Assistant Kevin reviewed his report on the Cit program and a proposed ordinan the disposal of garbage and ru licensing of garbage and rubbi recycling collection. He infc and the audience that this is introduction to curbside recyc a message from the Mayor, a br sign-up card will be sent to a in the community. He briefly recycling program, which will March 27th, and informed Coun recycling containers will be the residents in the two week the program commencement. Mr. then responded to Council que 1 j ected ements. Witt moved SAH 31 UNTY AFTER u the motion. n of N ACCEPTING N OF IGHTS the motion. thorization agreement s Park nce of a el and approval by staff, nce from the stallation with waiver f the motion. Batchelder recycling e regulating bish and the h and med Council he formal ing and that chure and a 1 residents xnlained the commence on it that the istributed to preceding Batchelder tions Page No. 2484 February 21, 1989 regarding subsidy, program goals and license fees. Mayor Mertensotto noted that representatives of several rubbish hauling firms were present and asked fo their comments. Mr. Jim Weinzettel, from Mendota Heights Rubbish, explained how his firm) proposes pick-up. He stated that handling recyclables is considerably more labor intensive than handling non -re yclables, and the subsidy does not therefore give the firms with the largest number cf customers an edge over other firms. He also felt that yard maintenance firms which remove yard wastes should be licensed so that the City gets full tonnage credit or the wastes that are hauled away. Mayor Mertensotto agreed that the City should consider licensing yard maintenance firms, and he asked whether th City could identify and establish a compo ting sites for residents to haul their ya d wastes to. Administrator Frazell stated t at he believes the County would stro gly encourage a community composti g site. Mayor Mertensotto expressed co'cern that the proposed $25.00 annual lic nse fee is too low and felt that it shoul be increased to $75 per year plus the cost the City pays for the license tabs to be more compatible with other communities. The Kruppeny & Sons and Weinzettel representatives indicated that they would have no objection to the fee proposed by Mayor Mertensotto. With respect to Mr. Weinzettel over licensing of yard mainten Administrative Assistant Batch that the sign-up card which wi residents asks them to provide with the name of the hauler wh their yard wastes. He felt th can work with those companies information on where they are wastes and asking for their co reporting tonnage. s question ince firms, slder stated .1 be sent to the City picks up Lt the City :o get raking the )aeration in Page No. 248 February 21, 198 Councilmember Cummins asked whe her there has been consideration given to charging more for rubbish collection to residents who do not recycle, to provide an incentive to recycle. Assistant Batchelder responded that this was contemplated but not pursued. Also responding to a question from Councilmember Cummins regarding building a subsidy into the system by penalizing those who do not recycle, Mr. Batchelder stated that volume based fees are not contemplated at this time and that he believes the legislature will enact volume based fees this year. Mr. Weinzettel stated that recycling is not now cost effective and that at present it is cheaper to serve those who o not recycle. Mr. Weinzettel asked that adjustment be made in Section 7.9 of the proposed ordinance so that the haulers need only to provide the city with scale receipts for recyclables and not the weight of each of the individual categories of recyclables. Council concurred. Mr.*Weinzettel stated that his firm provides service to many resid nts in Mendota Heights who do not place their trash containers curbside. He asked whether His firm can charge mo a to those customers for recycling service if they do not place their recycling containers curbside, as this extra service will be costly to him. He stated that his firm has always charged more for non -cu bside pick- up than for curbside pick-up. Councilmember Cummins pointed cut that if Mr. Weinzettel that since he charges more for the extra service whether or not the resident recycles, he is not violating the ordinance. Councilmember Blesener felt that there should be a provision in the o dinance to allow the haulers to charge extra if the recyclables are not curbside. It was consensus that Section.1 be amended in part to read "and n additional Page No. 2486 February 21, 1989 fee or charge may be made for si recycling pickup." curbside After discussion, Councilmembe Hartmann moved to accept the proposal from Banyon Data Systems dated January 13, 1989 and authorize the issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $10,400 for tie purchase of Novell Software and hardware and a Packard Bell computer as specified in the proposal, the costs to be distributed 45% to Administration, 20% each to Engineering and Utility, 10% to Other Funds and 5% to Consolidated Debt. II Councilmember Witt seconded toe motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 There being no further discussion, Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Ordinance No. 263, "AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1004." Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilmember Hartmann moved ad ption of Ordinance No. 264, (Codified as Ordinance No. 1004), "AN ORDINANCE REGULA ING THE DISPOSAL OF GARBAGE AND RUBBISH AND PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION THEREOF, AND LICENSING THE BUSINESS OF GARBA E AND RUBBISH AND RECYCLING COLLECTIO ," as amended to change the license f e in Section 4.2 to $75.00 and the c st of license plates; Section 6.2 ch ging County designated to County approved; Section 7.1 to curbside recycling pickup; section 7.9, deleting the last three lines; Section 7.12 b), deleting "in these monthly reports;"and Section 7.12'b3, deleting "by ueight and type." Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ATTORNEY REPORTS Discussion on reports from the City Attorney regarding adult uses and retail hours of operation was tabled. COMPUTER NETWORK Council acknowledged and discussed a report and recommendation from the Ci y Clerk regarding purchase of a comput r and network. After discussion, Councilmembe Hartmann moved to accept the proposal from Banyon Data Systems dated January 13, 1989 and authorize the issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $10,400 for tie purchase of Novell Software and hardware and a Packard Bell computer as specified in the proposal, the costs to be distributed 45% to Administration, 20% each to Engineering and Utility, 10% to Other Funds and 5% to Consolidated Debt. II Councilmember Witt seconded toe motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 2487 February 21, 1989 FIRE DEPARTMENT Council acknowledged a memo fro Administrator Frazell regarding Department Policies and Procedu Fire Chief Maczko was present t Council questions. AIRPORT NOISE COUNCIL COMMENTS PROCLAMATION Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 COUNCIL COMMENTS the Fire es manual. answer Council accepted the document, acknowledging that no Council a tion is required. Council acknowledged a memo f Shaughnessy regarding airport monitoring. Councilmember.Witt raised a qu potential impact of the loss o credit to owners of residentia in the Tax Increment District. Administrator Frazell responde does not believe Mendota Heigh affected. Councilmember Witt indicated to attend the LMC Legislative Councilmember Hartmann moved t the week of March 5th - 12th a of America Week. Councilmember Cummins seconded1the motion. Treasurer ise tion over homestead properties that he s will be t she plans nference. proclaim Volunteers Councilmember Blesener asked a status of installing gutters o She expressed concern over pot term roof damage which could b the icicles all the way around building. Administrator Fraze that he does not believe this in the building but rather is recent weather patterns. Publ Director Danielson was directe into the matter. out the City Hall. ntial long - caused by the 1 indicated s a defect aused by the c Works to look Councilmember Cummins asked wh ther the dog waste removal signs for the parks have been ordered. Administrator Frazell responded that their purchase and installation is a high-priority item for spring. Administrator Frazell informed Council that he has been notified that the Unisys building will close on June 1 t, resulting in a layoff of 170 people at the plant. Page No. 2488 February 21, 19891 Staff was directed to notify View home owners that the de Lexington/T.H. 110 site is c the Planning Commission on F with a revised proposal. leys Valley per of the g back to ary 28th ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmemler Cummins moved that the meeting be adjotrned. Councilmember Hartmann secondee the motion. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:18 o'clock P.M. Charles E. Merten Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk I LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY 21, 1989 Concrete License: Dwain— Pomerleau Masonry, Inc. Gas Piping License: All Season Comfort, Inc. General Contractor Licenses: Mendota Heights Landscaping Summit Energy, Inc: Plastering/Stucco License: Paron Spray Texture 1989 RUBBISH HAULERS LICENSE: BFI/Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 1, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. F e &,✓ty Administrator SUBJECT: Recommended Increase for City Mileage Reimbur Rate iA The City policy is currently to reimburse 22.5 cents per mile for use of a personal vehicle on City business. W understand that the Internal Revenue Service has now increased the allowable reimbursement to 24 cents per mile, and are recommending that the City of Mendota Heights g to that level. There is actually very little use of personal vehit for City business. The primary users are engineering technicians, with the costs being charged back to the projects. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with this recommendation, it should pass a motion increasing the City's mileage reimbursement rate to 24 cents per mile. KDF:kkb Iles MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �.�� February 7, 1989 To: Mayor and City Coxfnbil From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant( Re: Publication of Summary of Rubbish Hauling At the February 21, 1989 City Council meeting Council passed the new Rubbish Hauling Ordinance that included the provisions for licensing the collection of recyclables. Before an ordinance can become effective, either the entire document or a summary which clearly defines the intent of the ordinance must be published. It has been past practice to publish summaries f lengthy ordinances because of the cost of publication. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the summary of the Rubbish Hauling authorize its publication in the form attached. and SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 264 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE DISPOSAL OF GARBAGE PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION THEREOF, AND LICENSING OF GARBAGE AND RUBBISH AND RECYCLING COLLECTION RUBBISH BUSINESS The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights has determined that the following summary of the above -referenced ordinance (the "Ordinance") clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the Ordinance, and shall be published in lieu of publishing the entire text of the Ordinance. The City of Mendota Heights has determined it to be n the best interests of the citizens of Mendota Heights to ad pt the new Mendota Heights Rubbish Ordinance in order to provide licensing requirements for the purpose of curbside recycling services and to update the rubbish hauling ordinances of the City of Mendota Heights to meet the current needs of the community. Section 1 of the Ordinance cites the ordinance as t e "Mendota Heights Rubbish Ordinance". Section 2 of the Ordinance defines words and terms as sed in the ordinance. This section defines garbage, other refuse and recyclables. Targeted recyclables for the start of the City's Curbside Recyclables are metal beverage containers, gllass bottles and jars and newsprint. Section 3 of the Ordinance makes it unlawful to collect and haul garbage, other refuse and recyclables without first Dbtaining a license from the City. This section also includes an anti - scavenging provision to prevent the scavenging of recyclables from the curbside or collection point. Section 4 of the Ordinance describes the license appl fees procedures. The annual fee for a garbage haul will be $75 plus the cost of -a metal license for e operated in Mendota Heights. Applications will be prescribed by the City and licensing will be on an ar This section also describes the issuance, expiratio. revocation or suspension procedures for rubbish haulir Section 5 of the Ordinance requires licensees to fi City a Certificate of Insurance for liability. T shall procure and maintain commercial general liabilit covering personal injury including bodily injury a damage liability with a combined single limit of n $500,000 for each occurrence and aggregate. Said insurance shall provide for indemnity and security to Mendota Heights. cation and ng license ch vehicle on a form Dual basis. , renewal, r licenses. Le with the ie licensee y insurance id property less than policies of the City of Section 6 of the Ordinance stipulates the collection re Collection trucks shall be covered, leak proof and kept free of odors as much as possible. All refuse must go approved facilities. Collection of garbage, other i recyclables must be made available weekly. Collectioi made between 7 A.M. and 6 P.M. Monday through Friday. collections must be made available to all residential weekly basis, if so desired, by March 27, 1989. Section 7 of the Ordinance makes recycling a condit garbage hauling. license. There will be no additional charge to customers for curbside recycling as of customers with no recycling services. Rubbish hauling 7 be filed with the city and a notice of a change in rate made available to the City 30 days prior to effect. recyclables will be metal beverage cans, glass bottles and newspapers. Weekly collection must be made avai collection of recyclables will be on the same day as scheduled garbage service. The hauler retains ownersh recyclables and cannot incinerate or landfill recyclables. The haulers will provide the City with x the collected recyclables and will be reimbursed as pr Council resolution policy. The City of Mendota Height ownership of the recycling containers. Resident cust not put container out more than 12 hours in advance or out more than 12 hours after collection., ulations. clean and to County fuse and s must be Recycling nits on a ion of a or extra posed to ates must s must be Minimum and jars Table and regularly ip of the collected eports on ovided in s retains :)mers may leave it Section 8 of the Ordinance provides that violatio of the ordinance is a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a. fine not to exceed $700 or by imprisonment in the County jail for a period of not to exceed 90 days, or both. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEI By: Charles E. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk to Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO February TO: Mayor, City Council andCi r �a FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Dog Litter Signs DISCUSSION: Council directed staff to find a sign to install in the par would inform users to leash and pick up after their dogs. Staff that we use the "off the shelf" sign shown below. This sign can be ordered in any size however we suggest an 1 size. The price for that sign would be $28 per sign and $11 for suggest the following 10 locations where signs could be placed: Roger's Lake Park Friendly Hills Park Marie Avenue Park Copperf field Ponds Wentworth Park Hagstrom King Park Victoria Highlands Park Ivy Hills Park Mendakota Park Valley Park ACTION REQUIRED:- Approve E UIRED: Approve a dog waste sign and give staff any guidance on desi tions for the signs. DOG WASTE IS A THREAT TO THE HEALTH OF OUR CHILDREN - DEGRADES OUR TOWN - TRANSMITS DISEASE LEASH AND CLEAN UP AFTER YOUR DOG IT'S REQUIRED BYLAW! ORDINANCE NO. 9-3-8 JED:dfw 27, 1989 that uggests 311 X 2411 3 post. I loca- Page 1 February 28, 1989 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, February 28, 1989, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve. Chairman Morson called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The following members were present: Morson, Anderson, Koll, Duggan, Dwyer and Kreb bach. Commissioner McMonigal had informed the Commission that she was resig ing and was absent. Also present were Planner Howard Dahlgren, Public Works Dire for Jim Danielson, and Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder. APPROVAL OF Commissioner Koll offered a correction to th MINUTES minutes on Page 4. Commissioner Duggan move approval of the January 24, 1989 minutes as orrected. Commissioner Koll seconded the motion. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 89-04 Mr. William Sutmer, 1789 Victoria Road was p1lesent to SUTMER, VARIANCE explain that he desired to construct a garage addition to his home that will encroach on his northerly side yard setback by 2 feet. Chairman Morson asked about a power pole that will be in the way of construction. Mr. Sutmer explained that Northern States Power Company will remove the pole and reinstall his electric s rvice un=- derground. Commissioner Dwyer asked why his existing ga age couldn't just be shortened by two feet thus aliminating the need for a variance. Mr. Sutmer explainad that this would cause an odd sized, less functional ro m. Commissioner Koll said that she had called M . Sutmer's affected neighbors and although they were not totally pleased with the proposal, they did approve of it. Commissioner Krebsbach moved to recommend approval of the requested 2 foot side yard variance. Commissioner Koll seconded the motion. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 Page 2 February 28, 1989 CASE NO. 89-07 Mr. Joe Schaefer of West St. Paul, was prese t to ex- SCHAEFER, LOT plain a requested lot division. Mr. Schaefer and Mr. DIVISION Tilsen jointly own Lot 5, Block 1, Tilsen's Highland Heights Plat No. 3 and they desire to subdivide this wooded lot diagonally and add the two newly created parcels to existing abutting lots in order t preserve the woods and open space. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 89-08 KUROSS, LOT DIVISION Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 There was concern expressed Planning Commiss on membe that future owners of these new lots do not ieturn to the City at a later date requesting to further subdiv these parcels to create buildable lot. Commissioner Duggan moved to praisse the ow lot for preserving open space within the Ci mend waiving the public hearing and approvi division. Commissioner Dwyer seconded the Mr. Art Kuross, developer of Val's Addition,' to explain that the purchaser of Outlot A in vision desired to increase its size to have access. -The Planning Commission had no problems wi quest. Commissioner Dwyer moved to waive the public recommend approval of the requested subdivis City Council. Commissioner Krebsbach second tion. CASE NO. 89-o6 Chairman Morson called the meeting to order PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP- purpose of a public hearing on United Prope3 MENT, PRELIMINARY cation for a variance, Conditional Use Perm: PLAT AND VARIANCE Planned Unit Development, and preliminary p] Northeast corner of Executive Drive and Nor] (Mendota Heights Business Center 3rd Additi( Mr. Dale Glowa of United Properties was pre; hearing and stated that this parcel was goii divided into two parcels. Solvay Animal Het has received a building permit for Lot 1, B] that the building can be completed by Augus- ;rs of this r and recon- ; the sub - )tion. was present his subdiL t wider the re- hearing and Lon to the :d the mo-. for the ties appli- t fora ij at for the hland Drive n). ent at the g to be lth, Inc. ock 1 so 15, 1989. Y Page 3 February 28, 1989 He also stated that even though Lot 2 is lef as a unusal shaped lot, United Properties is confident it will be adaptable to successful development. Mr. Glowa stated that Solvay Animal Hospital, Inc., now located in Charles City, Iowa, is a high tec company which will employ approximately 130 people. The build- ing would be a 60,000 square foot buildng on a six acre site with 173 parking stalls in the front wi h 53 in the back. He stated that the parking stalls in the back would be left as green area for now and that if in the future expansion of the parking stalls is needed they would put the 53 in the back. Mr. Glowa staled that this building would be of same quality as th other buildings in the business park. Commissioner Krebsbach asked what was done i the facility. Mr. Glowa responded that the laboratory woul breed poultry, inside the building, and use them t test vacines and run tests on them. Commissioner Krebsbach asked how the waste f$om the poultry, etc. was taken out of the facility.) Mr. Glows stated that there is one dock in tie back and that the wastes are in barrels and would be removed from the premises to Eden Pairie. He also stated that this facility is a clean and safe use. It is regilated and inspected by the Federal, State, County, and EPA to insure safety. Commissioner Dwyer asked if any other animal would be tested on at this site such as swine or catt e. Mr. Glowa responded that poultry was the only animal. Commissioner Koll asked if radiation would be used. Mr. Glows stated that radiation would be usdA but only in small doses. Commissioner Duggan asked what kind of prec utions are taken for evacuation of employees and notification of area residents in the event of an accident. He also asked if someone would be available at the Council meeting to address this concern. Mr. Glowa stated the Elerbe Beckett the desi laboratory has extensive experience in desij tories and the sophisticated electrical and gner of this ning labora- mechanical t Page 4 February 28, 1989 systems and that he would try to have someonE to attend the City Council meeting to address this concern. Commissioner Koll asked why United Propertied was asking for a variance in the parking width. Mr. Glows, stated that the reason for this waf that the industry has gone away from big cars and alsc that in an office setting an 8.51wide parking stall is sufficient. He also stated that United Properties has as ed for this variance throughout their properties in the lark and it has proved acceptable. Commissioner Duggan moved to close the hearing. Commis- sioner Krebsbach seconded. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 Chairman Morson stated that the Commission did not have adequate materials and drawings to make a recommendation to the City Council at this meeting. He asked Mr. Duffy to proceed to explain his proposal and after that the Commission and residents would ask questions. Commissioner Duggan asked for clarification o legal rights on the part of the Commission and the �eveloper. Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend approlyal of the preliminary plat; approval of the Planned Unit Develop- ment with drawings submitted and reviewed on February 28, 1989 subject to final approval by City Staff for engineering, which includes water and air fi tration and waste disposal, and landscape details; approval the variance to parking bay to 60 feet wide and spacing of 8-1/2 feet; and the approval for reduction of the parking requirements to 173 spaces with the condition that in the event that additional parking is needed, it will be provided as indicated on the site plan drawings as submitted. Commissioner Krebsbach seconded. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 89-03 Chairman Morson called the meeting to order for the DUFFY, REZONING, purpose of a continued public hearing on Mr. John VARIANCE, CUP FOR Duffy's application for the rezoning, variancie, Condi- A PUD, PRELIMINARY tional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development, pre - PLAT, ZONING ORDINANCE liminary plat and zoning ordinance amendment Ifor the AMENDMENT property at the Southeast quadrant of Lexington Avenue and Trunk Highway 110. Chairman Morson stated that the Commission did not have adequate materials and drawings to make a recommendation to the City Council at this meeting. He asked Mr. Duffy to proceed to explain his proposal and after that the Commission and residents would ask questions. Commissioner Duggan asked for clarification o legal rights on the part of the Commission and the �eveloper. Page 5 February 28 Chairman Morson stated that the Commission the hearing up to 60 days from the original date. After that time the Developer has the proceed to the Council with or without Plan Commission approval and.take his chances at Council. The 60 days can be extended upon agreement of the Developer and the Commissi Mr. Duffy stated that his market study showe original proposal is the best scheme for thi but that he has basically two scaled down pr The first is similar to the original but sca. The gas station/convenience store (Super Ame been reduced to 12 pumps and 2,900-3,000 squ the size of the center has been reduced to 2 feet and that they have lowered the building Ej Ln continue searing •ight to .ng ;he City is mutual that the location posals. ed down. ica) has re feet and ,000 square Commissioner Dwyer asked who would be tenant and that if the gun shop was still going to be there. Mr. Duffy stated that he had a video store, Pizza place, dry cleaners, and home glass and mirror shop and that the gun shop will not be one of the tenants. Commissioner Krebsbach asked if there would pe any sporting goods store in this location. Mr. Duffy responded there will not be a spor ing goods store in this complex. Commissioner Dwyer asked what the hours of o eration for the convenience store would be and what is the antici- pated trips per day to make it feasible for this proposal. Mr. Bob Field of Croix Oil stated that hours of opera- tion would be from 5-6 A.M. to Midnight. No diesel fuel would be available for trucks. -,Super Americi anitic- pates 400-600 average trips per day. Commissioner Krebsbach asked if this smaller convenience store would be obsolete or inadequate for Suer America compared to the other stations they provide. Mr. Field stated that Super America has smal er stations and they are not obsolete or inadequate for he antici- pated trips per day. He also stated that he does not see Croix Oil coming back before the City as ing to expand the facility. Commissioner Koll asked about the drainage f$'om this site. Page 6 February 28, 1989 Mr. Duffy responded that this site would draib into the State ditch system. Commissioner Dwyer asked if they proposed to ower the building would you step down into the building. Mr. Duffy stated no, the land in the back of the site is 6 feet higher than the front. What they propose is to follow the natural grade of the land and make) the front and the back the same. Commissioner Duggan expressed that the Develo er should make the building as asthetic as possible including the back area of the building which faces the neighborhood. He also stated that he would like a more defi ate plan on what kind of building is proposed. Mr. Duffy stated that he would like to know w at direc- tion he is going before spending more money a d time on architectural renderings for several proposal . Chairman Morson asked the audience for questions on this proposal. Allen and Judy Werthauser, 2044 Patricia, stated that they felt the residential area was still too lose, the traffic to the neighborhood would still be heivy. They also stated that they wouldn't mind B-2 zonin with conditional uses. He asked that a list of B-3 uses be read to the audience. Mr. Kevin Frazell, City Administrator, read te list of approved uses in the B-3 zoning district. Chairman Morson asked the Werthauser's if the wanted the Super America station. Mr. and Mrs. Werthauser stated that they did of want Super America, they do not want the traffic tat would generate from this proposal and they don't wait the value of their property to drop. Mr. Al Price, 2106 Patricia Street, asked how much noise does the City expect the neighborhood to put up with, they have the planes and now they want to cre to more noise with this development. Chairman Morson stated that the City or the is in favor of redeveloping this corner and City and the Commission are here to help in went of the property that will be acceptable cial to both the developer and the neighborh ission the develop- benefi- Page 7 February 28 Mr. Price asked where does the money from T Financing come from. 1989 Increment Mr. Frazell explained the fundamentals of Ta Increment Financing in regard to this original propose . Mr. Tim Curley, owner of the property, want that Tax Increment Financing was brought up not the developer or himself. Mr. Duffy stated that no taxpayer's money is because the devloper will protect the City's with a letter of credit. Commissioner Dwyer asked when this property the Tax Increment District. Mr. Frazell stated that it was added in 1985 Mr. F.B. Daniel, 2056 Timmy Street, asked of this proposed Super America. it noted the City, at risk interest s added to t was the size Mr. Fields stated that this Super America wa 12 pumps the building square footage was 2900-3000 copared to the original proposal of 4,500 square feet aIriginal. d that the canopy has been reduced 20 percent from the Mr. Albert Werthhauser asked what was the bufer between the building and street. Mr. Duffy responded that the building to rigjt-of-way of the street was 75-80 feet. Mr. Price stated that he felt that Lexington Avenue was not wide enough to accomodate the existing taffic let alone the traffic generated from this propos 1. A gentleman stated that he was concerned abot safety of children on Lexington Avenue and Trunk Highw y 110. He also stated leave it zoned B-2, no filling s ation. Mr. James McShane, 2061 Theresa Street, statd that the Commission should listen to the citizens of he neigh- borhood, they are the City. Chairman Morson again explained the roles of the Planning Commission and staff participation n this proposal. He stated that the Commission is irying to find out exactly what the neighborhood wants but hasn't heard that. Page 8 February 28, Commissioner Duggan reiterated Chairman Mors went and added that the developer has the ri develop this piece of property and that the is here to aid in the best interest of the d the neighborhood. A gentleman asked if the County has been asked to upgrade this intersection. Mr. James Danielson, Public Works Director, the City has requested the County to upgrade section but T.H. 110, a state highway, is al and the State feels an upgrading is not warr this time. The City is continuing its effor this intersection safer. He also stated tha study would not be done by the County until velopment of this property. Mr. Harry Wise, 3077 Timmy Street, asked if done a traffic study on this intersection. 1989 's state - t to mmission eloper and ted and ated that his inter - involved ted at to make a traffic ter de- ne has Mr. Duffy responded that the State has done some traffic studies and that the State is the agency pusling for the frontage road because of the bottleneck at T.H. 110 and that the State will pay for the frontage roa but will not pay for the right-of-way. Mr. Price asked what affect the Mendota Bride closure will have on the development. Mr. Duffy stated that that was not a concern of the neighborhood it was his concern. Mr. Wise stated this was the neighborhood'soncern and that he would like to see the City make a go d invest- ment. Mr. John Nides, 2094 Patricia Street, stated that he has not heard one positive thing on this proposa , he sug- gested that the City leave the corner as it 's but clean it up. Mr. Vince Anderson stated that the neighborhood is land locked. He wanted to know if there would be a bike trail or are the children going to have to walk or ride on Lexington Avenue because he is concerned for the safety of the children in the neighborhood. Chairman Morson stated that the present bikj trail is on an easement given to the City by Tom Curly n a tempor- aryibasis and that easement can be surrende Ied to Mr. Pa ge 9 February 28 Curley on 30 days notice. He also asked if County planned on a trail in that area. Mr. Danielson stated that the City has been with the County but as stated earlier the Co not agree with the City that it warrants upg When it does get upgraded there will be a tr Lexington Avenue south to Mendota Heights Ro vide safer crossing at the intersection of L Avenue and Highway 110. 1989 to n contact my does ading. it along d and pro- xington Mr. Werthauser suggested that the City might buy the corner and turn it into a park. Commissioner Duggan again stated the positioa of the City and the Commission and reiterated again that the owner of the property has the right to devel p his property. Mr. Werthauser agreed that the owner of the Property has the right to develop the property but that i should be developed as a B-2 district and not rezoned po B-3. Chairman Morson asked Mr. Duffy to present hs other plan. Mr. Duffy presented Plan C which would not i volve rezoning, it would remain B-2 with condition 1 use per- mits to allow the existing businesses to rem in because the gas station and furniture.store are not llowed in B-2. He also mentioned Plari'B which includei a separate building for the gas station. Chairman Morson asked the owners of SOS Convenience Mart what plan they liked better. They stated that they liked Plan C. alThey astated that they would like to stay -but that they w nted a fair price for their property, that they would to e their chance on condemnation. Mr. Duffy stated that he has not had the opp rtunity to meet with the City since the appraisals of tie property have come back. Chairman Morson asked Planner Dahlgren to address Plan C. Planner Dahlgren gave a history of the property and addressed the traffic problems, pointed out that if this plan were accepted that the wall and trees w uld no longer be there, and there would be residential lots Page 10 February •28 even closer to the development. He also sta property will be developed now or in the fu the neighborhood must realize that and that done to the satisfaction of the developer a borhood. He recommended that no action be Commission at this meeting and that the dev quest the matter to be tabled. 1989 d that the re and that t can be the neigh - ken by the oper re - Chairman Morson stated that a committee representing the neighborhood meet with Planner Dahlgren, City staff, and Developer to find out exactly what will be Satisfactory to all parties concerned. Mr. Curley gave the history of the corner fr m his viewpoint. Mr. Wise felt that the development of this p operty should wait until after the Mendota Bridge restoration was completed. Mr. Curley stated that his business could wi hstand the closure of the Mendota Bridge but he did not know if the others could. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that the commitee should also address the bike trail issue. Mr. Daniels asked how to proceed if it tookMonger to work out a solution. Chairman Morson stated that after 60 days th developer has to agree to extend. Mr. Daniels stated that he was at the hearin when Tom Curley proposed putting the wall up and thathe sacri- ficed the lots to provide a screen to the neighborhood._ After considerable discussion on when a meeting between the Developer, Planner, City and neighborhood would be possible Planner Dahlgren suggested that Mr. Duffy re- quest that the decision on proposal be tabled to the next Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Duffy requested that the matter be to March Planning Commission meeting: Chairman Morson suggested that a motion be me the matter so that the neighborhood committe( after the meeting and set a definite date to the developer, planner and staff. to the e to table could meet eet with Page 11 February 28, Commissioner Anderson expressed his dismay the Planning Commission still had not really giver veloepr or neighborhood any indication of its 1989 t the the de- iesires. Commissioner Krebsbach moved that the hearing be con- tinued until the next Planning Commission mee ing on March 28, 1989 and that if a decision is reac ed by the committee and the developer that the developei will provide the materials, as specified in the ordinance, so that the Commission can make a fair decision n this case. Commissioner seconded. Ayes: 5 Nays: 1 Anderson ADJOURN Commissioner Duggan moved to adjourn the meet ng. Com- missioner Dwyer seconded. The meeting was ad ourned at 10:12 p.m. V CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 2, 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council and City V�Wator FROM: Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer SUBJECT: MAC Runway 4/22 Extension DISCUSSION• During the last year, the City has on two occasions r to Environmental concerns on the proposed Runway 4/22 extension at the airport. Lied Mn DOT is now in the process of holding a hearing, the third on this issue by different agencies, an the Environmental issues. It appears that Mn DOT will now be the agency which prepares the EIS on the project. The hearing will be held on March 14, with comments to be received until March 24. The person conducting the hearing tells us that our preious comments will be made a part of this hearing, however, have prepared the attached letter to resubmit the two previo s comments. Copies are attached. ACTION• Authorize resubmition of the City comments to the heari record for Runway #4/22 Environmental Issues. .m. Hearing Examiner Runway 4/22 Extension Attn: Mr. Richard Theisen Program Manager Mn DOT 427 Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Gentlemen: city of Mendota H00,hts March 2, 1989 On two previous occasions, the City has been request e to respond to Environmental Issues with respect to the a tension of Runway 4/22. Copies of our previous comments are ttached for your hearing record. The City believes that the proposed extension of the unway will result in serious noise exposures for new areas f the City of Mendota Heights which have not been subject t aircraft overflights. It might be possible to provid areas of minimum ground effect, however, the areas of conce n are predominantly established residential areas which wou d not be compatible with overflights. In view of our ongoing problem of trying to contain d parting flights in an area which was zoned for noise compatibility, and the inability of the FAA to respect this zoned ar a for flight tracts, we doubt that any predetermined depart re paths could be established and effective. We hope that the comments addressed in our comments 20, 1988 to MAC and December 15, 1988 to the FAA can addressed in the EIS preparation. Sincerely,, Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor CEM/rmd 1101 Victoria Curve • Mendota Heights, MN • 5511 May e 452.1850 M A AAAAA AA ;.,December 21, 1988. t Cly of Mendota He ghts Mr.'Franklin D. Benson, Manager U.S. Department -of Transportation Federal Aviatioh Administration Room 111 6301 - 34th Avenue South - Minneapolis, MN 5.5450 Dear Mr. BensOnt I want to thank you on behalf of the City of Mend Heights for the opportunity to respond to the elements proposed EIS Statement for the Runway 4/22 extension a Twin cities:International Airport. From the Environmental.Assessment Summary which y sent us, we find that several elements of direct and s concern to the.City of Mendota Heights have been omitt the Summary. We believe that the following elements s receive complete review in the EIS which is to be prep These items all affect the City's continuing attention compatible land use in the City and our efforts to lim effects of the airport traffic and noise on our reside 1. No mention has been made of the increased c level at the airport resulting from the run extension. 2. The noise level and noise contours relating tc departures on runway 4 and arrivals on runway 2 have not been developed. The use of these procedures results in intense and objectionable noise levels to an entirely new group of reside in the City and acts to make a sham of city qn efforts to be a compatible neighbor to the ai p f the have ious from uld ed. 0 the S. ity 2 nts ing ort. 3. There is no statement as to the development of flight tracts to the northeast of the airport for either departures or arrivals. The absence of these tracts make it impossible to relate operation E to the noise exposure which will be received in these areas of the City.,:. t, The current 180 day test use of runway 22/4 has to show noise exposures above acceptable levels in an the City which has not been exposed in the past. Th operations should be stopped as soon as the test peri .,'over, and all departures, except for strict weather -r operations, ceased. 1101 Victoria Curve* -Mendota Heights, MN - 55118 rved rea of e is ated 452.1850 May 23, 1988 Mr. Hal Greenwood, Chair Metropolitan Airports Commission 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450 Re: Runway 4-22 Environmental Assessment File Dear Mr. Greenwood: Following are the -comments of the City of Mendota Heigh s concerning the Environmental Assessment for the Runway -22 Extension project. Mendota Heights has taken no position either to support or to oppose the proposed project. As an airport neighbor, o r primary concern is the definition of an acceptable flig t corridor procedure for departures from Runways 11R and 1L, and strict compliance with that procedure (please see o r attached resolution). We are also concerned about the mpact of departures from Runway 4 on northern Mendota Heights While at first glance one might think the proposed ext: cion of 4-22 would not affect these areas, we believe there ire potential ramifications, and find the Environmental Assessment deficient in not addressing them. These are our specific requests: 1. The Assessment assumes that the extended Runway 4-2 and Runway 29L -11R could not be operated at the same ti e. Would this result in departures from 11L being dire ted more to the middle of the Mendota Heights/Eagan a g eater percentage of the time? If so, we would like to see revised Ldn contour maps reflecting this change. 2. Is it an absolute certainty that the extended 4-22 and the existing parallel runways would not all be ope ated simultaneously, as the Assessment presupposes, or ould it be possible be use the airport in this fashion y "shooting the gap" between flights? If yes, how m ch would that increase the overall operational capaci y of the airport, and what are the environmental conseq ences of that alternative? 3. A discussion of project implications on Runway 4 - departures over Highland Park (and potentially no Mendota Heights) seems to be conspicuously absent :kern :rom 4. 5. the Assessment, and we would ask that this be ;ed. The extension Project is Vremised upon the idea tha it will improve flight distribution patterns, and iden ifies svecific Vatterns to be followed. Are there other ew distribution patterns that might be made possible b the Runway 22 ektension. If so, what are they, and wha are the environmental implications? Finally, we . feel that no final decision to build th extension should be made until the Metropolitan Cou,cil Airport Adequacy Task Force has issued its final retort. Thank you for the opportunity to offer our comments and requests. N I sincerely, Charles E. Merte Mayor 4ayor, City Council, and Cl CR9�r-tor FROM: Paul R. Berg, Coda Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Building Activity Report for February, 1989 BUILDING 9 $516,535.00 $5,393.05 TRADE PERMITS: No. Valuation Fee Collected SFD 2 327,814.00 2,849.56 Apt 0 0 0 Townhouse 0 0 0 Condo 0 0 0 Misc. 3 10,878.00 297.00 C/I 4 177,843.00 2,246.49 Sub Total 9 $516,535.00 $5,393.05 TRADE E o. Valuation PERMITS: No. Valuation P 'ng 11 345.00 H 3 15.00 Sewer 0 0 Heat, AC, 0 5 821,235.00 G Gas 13 713.00 Sub Total 27 1,073.00 Licensing: Contractor's MEMO Date: February 23, 1989 89 - YEAR TO DATE 391.00 88 - YEAR TO D E o. Valuation Fee Collected No. Valuation Fee Collected 6 943,418.00 8,323.45 9 1,295,017.00 11,752.46 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 821,235.00 7,041.21 0 0 0 7 1,500,000.00 7,490.18 0 0 0 8 64,586.00 1,431.90 5 2,055,165.00 8,485.96 7 188,443.00 2,543.49 11 137,595.35 2,073.83 33 $3,517,682.00 $26,830.23 25 $3,487,777.35 $22,312.25 22 591.00 17 391.00 11 55.00 7 35.00 5 87.50 1 17.50 25 1,524.00 20 4,034.00 63 2,257.50 45 4,477.50 Licenses 34 850.00 256 6,400.00 221 5,525.00 Total 70 $516,535.00 $7,316.05 352 $3,517,682.00 $35,487.73 291 $3,487,777.35 1 $32,314.75 NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac, and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan chekk fee, and valuation amounts. MENDOTA 14EIG14TS fiff DEPARTMENT IL FEBRUARY 1989 MONTHLY REPORT FIRE CALL-$ 110. NIJN B ER CSF CAL L`t: It FIRE ALARMS DISPATCHED: —R—UMBER ACTUAL FIRES — $0 Structure - VIH Commern 'I $0 Structure - MH Re;ilderitjal 5tructure - Oontrixt Areas 0 T H Vehicle - NH FOR MONTH 12.5 Vehicle - Q,11tract Areas S t1H C011V110 RLE-11-4,",PECT101-1 VI E E T I N(3':'. MEDICAL Artist 3 Extrtatinn HAZARDOUS SITUATION 5pifls/Le,iks — Arcing/5horting 01,mical Power Line Dom*i FALSE ALARM Resident),11 ticil furlt lot) Unintentional - lercial Unintentional - criminal GOOD INTENT n cd4, e '-,c a 1, c Ste3ffi 11 iSt,4-e!) fol' "11101P�e Other 3 MUTUAL AID TOTAL CALLS 11 LOCATION OF FIRE ALARMS: TO DATE NENDOTA HEIGHTS 10 2? NENDOTA 0 0 5UNFI51-1 LAKE 0 1 LILYDALE 1 1? OTHER 0 0 TOTAL 11 WORK PERFORMED HOURS TO DATE FIRE CALL 151 369 t, I E E T I f 103 D P I L L WEEKLY CLEAN-UP 55 124 SPECIAL ACTIVITY 4".. AIMIN15TATIVE 105 211 FIRE MARSHAL 4= 125 TOTALS 1195 STRUCTURE CONTENTS mi TOTAL MONTHLY FIRE LOSSES FIRE LOSS TOTALS MENDO ALL FIRE:a, ALL AREAS 01ONTHI) — i1END,HT1"'),O1N1L'f STRUCT/COMEI-IM'S 1,10,11). HTS,. ONLY ME11f), HT.', TOTAL TO DATE ,V) TOTALS TO DATE HEIG14TS BILLING FOR SEIRVICES $0 $0 Tc, 000 $6,000 10 t f-, jno AGENCY THIS MONT I TO DATE I-IN/DoT — $0 rl I UN RP $0 C -1,11p F"R.. 0 T H FIRE MARSHAL'S TIME MPECTION!5 IMESTICiPiTION.'i FOR MONTH 12.5 LAST YEAR I TOTALS: $0 $0 33 12 FIRE MARSHAL'S TIME MPECTION!5 IMESTICiPiTION.'i FOR MONTH 12.5 0 S 40 RLE-11-4,",PECT101-1 VI E E T I N(3':'. 85 LAST YEAR 12,5 ADVI I N I "-j RAT I Of 1 20 5, 165 124 SPECIAL PRo.JE11**T,'. 6.5 14 2 5 cel TOTAL 48 REVIARK.& SEE OTHER - IDE FOR '�YNOI?515 IiFIIiF 0E11ARIMENT MONTHLY WORK PERFORMANCE FOR FEBRUARY 19139 „ AILS FOR i1ftPlTli•T` l c�- _} - �L CALLS NM YGEN ORRESCUE UP DRILL MTQ MTS I _ UOKIETSPECIAUiATEt�E�j QRIIL s�L�q DRILL -i ACT_ •_._- _+ YEAR TO [SATE j; ATT'D I HOURS I ATT'D I THIS ;; �' 2 � 2 !~ 2 2 � ;ADM MONTH ; MONTH! ; FHOU_R_S ! HOURS llHrH_R_S. ! HOURS! HOURS _ OURS ! HOURS I HRS _YEAR _ YEAR CHIEF John Nauko _ !; 6 i _ 6 1112 } 43 . -1 _.._'. .._.7-! i i 2 1?_ _ 1 � _.. � _._-•`----- 1 j ! ---__--�- 105 -- - - ASST. Bill Lerb3 3 1 280 (I 2 2 2 2 i2 I r I c 1�--•-•c n nw j —• I —n n I � (-- i CAPT.Y•.eithsteln a_ _, 1-12_� 4•_�:� I! 2 -2 . '- Paul Dreelen j j 4 i 10 ! 40;- ! _ _ L. Mike Coonan ! ! I ' 1 ! 5 CaordY SklrrvFn.._. I - _ ? 17--a--- fee°; ��.1Ci_ ��__ -` �� 2 ....... .... -, Ed Adrian_-. t. '' f. a�-' " 2_. ! I __-l. Jin, Perron__ ! _ _.:'_.. -- ! `�._� �... t i 44T; _� _._ ••- _ �.^ `I -F - _ _ - - - -.L- rtike ttarscullio i . _..r--1 1 _3 ` 3 1 --l- '2a - --�-- -- ,n ! I ! I --- I: APT. R. il�ti�tttar�a� . _. f.- 5__.i.._._ c ...-i__. 12 t.. 4921" 1 i I 2 fsi11 Chj?let..._ , �..; 1 445 I 2 ' ! � t jorc Cnnnnl1YJ1 I John 2 it. 21 Style Carlson I f S i 3 3 f 12,13 ! I Dick Z n_ •._ ___ (�ajt' r Z t11 14 •6PO ... ...- a --- -i Er ick 15 hmidt I �— .i_ ! r 32m ,1F ' _� 1 CAPT Jeff Stenhoug ! 4 1 11 I 443--! I _'' _l 2 ; Laro rlo,ack L; tr: I ...1r1 ,- 2 9§5- ._ _ I .....13- - - - 1., , ! ! 2 i 2 I- 2 I- Lambert Der l,.3 I l., �4 ; 19 i-- 76 , P Geor Noael•, Jr. _ I ! 1�� ! .�_�� _t :_ -! - - ! r 2 .__._ Tnm dlund 1 l ! 1 t, I F+ ! . • .1? 16;', ! `2 0 -I Mike Naczkn Din Barrett - 2.._ ` _ J6'�—j• ;`---- r-•------� •,� I --i---.- •---.. ._______--. � Aaron Coates I `a I 9 l 20 80 f 2 2 2 CAPT. Jamie Lerbs Tom �titeinzettel 3 I 1 1 41! 4 16 o _ ! __:? ___,�_ '2 I 2 ! ...__..._ I ! I i_....! !---� _...__`_�-- _-•_,--_... _ 16 I _ --6 I --- +4 John Lann�•ko Jim P;ilburg _---r�_ -9 I ..{ _� a - I �lui� 17 611; 12 4.t1 "-- L ( 1 L I t 2 � --' _2 2 ! -` y ? I ,� - -2 Y•evin Perron _ I ---`.- l- 7 I TOTAL FOR NONTH TOTAL FOR YEAR - ! ! I 151 ! _.._.._ -+_- 36r9 ! TOTAL ATTENDED !TOTAL t'1AtJ H:AJRS rI 2'� %' i _ a S -►- s' I -S:• 4S 10 10 _ 3 f 8 _ 4 _-- - _ori I THI'= 1.1011TH LAST 1`1ONTH ;LAST'YEAPI _ ---- - - V 61-t 4 /E. Rd5/I 1Atd i c. 1 -1 �8 vv v'd XXXX;c,..',XXX _ _ _ _ %XXXXXXXX AVE t'1EWPLIfJ I1._x.73 ! ' I tE,.ia �i �- 17_>1L1_ j__._I__—_-•! i - - -- AVE O FOP YEAR 14400 r r a5,8r.� ! 46•x3 '. z ,y .r Feoruary ,gra SYNOPSIS OF MONTHLY RUNS The f ire department responded to 1 1 calls during the month. None o� calis were actuai fires and no losses occurred. .,lust a tide note to date we have responded to 38S fewer emergencies in i988 and we hope that this trend continues. MONTHLY TRAINING The February monthly training started the first, of a six part prograrn titled Fire Attack., Strategy and Tactic_ of Initial Company Response. is a progarn that we purchased to aid our prograrn. The f irst night. included :-, rare -test of all firefighters, that v/111 be kept until the end n orograml al lowing the fTref ight. rs to see what they have learned. The !=rnph i= !�t the hist se:�sion utas was on firefighter survival Recounition of b:ick;draft. and f lashover and the tactics to foIIow lit de with these ronrlrtioni, The Saturday mak:.e-1.rp drill was, the exact d!rEilrr:�te The P'oo .le's worked with the foam ed+_rctor and tools on all the trucra_.. Tl',e Pescue Drill involved going over- all equiprnent on 228 SPECIAL TRAINiNG Depar'trnent members received refresher training on new CPR techniQ Two firefighters. started Firefighter I training and with there cornplet only a members wiII not be Vo -Tech Certified. Thi= i; 88.51!u of departrrient members which is excellent in comparison to other departments. Also during February five mernbers attended a 12 hot.rr Fire instructor Association of Hinnesota t.raininq session at the Forrest Lake High SO, The mernbers. were Assistant Fire Chief Bill Lerbs, Training Coordin-at! George Lowe, Captain ._Jamie Lerbs and f iref ight.ers Jirn I, Ibr_rrq and Ler NOack. Subjects Of sturdy were Firefighter safety and survival, Death the Fireground and Arson Awareness. the than is the ling of Ion I LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 7, 1989 Concrete License: Dakota Rhoads Masonry, Inc. Gas Piping License: Northland Mechanical Contractors, Inc. General Contractor Licenses: J.L. Junkman Construction, Inc. K & K Heating &.Plumbing, Inc. Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses: Dayton Bluff Sheet Metal, Inc. Northland Mechanical Contractor, Inc. 1989 RUBBISH HAULER LICENSE: Roadway Rubbish 2 Ma- 1969 Thu 12:11 PM T- shark Number Temp. Number Vendor Name 1 A M M Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 2 2 A T & T 2 A T & T 2 A T & T 2 A T & T Totals Temp Check Number TL -mm rhf-nk Numhm- 3 AT&T :; AT&T 3 AT&T 3 AT&T 12 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 4 4 Qcrn of Minn 4 TntAl� Temp phenk Number Temp Check Number 5 --I 5=Engr--�- - .60 -Utilities--...==== 3/7/ts9 Claims Li20-Police 70 -Parks Page I / City of Mendota List/,' w� 30 -Fire 80 -Planning 40 -CEO 85-REcycling --09-Cnjinrjj 9 -0 -Animal -Con I Account Code 01-4400-110� 01-4210-110-10 01-4210-040-40 01-4210-OSO-50 01-4210-050-50 2 01-4210-020-20 01-4210-050-5 01-4210-070-70 15-4210-060-60 5 Apache 01-4620-030-30 5 Totals Temp Check Number 5 Tp_mg2_Cbp-r_k Number 6 Arneson Fuel Oil Service 01-1210 6Arneson Fuel Oil Service 01-irlin 6 Arneson Fuel Oil Service 01-1210 L Totals Temp Check Number 6 -T,*� &eck Number 7 7 9 & J Auto Supply 15-4330-490-60 Comments P-17 mtn LD calls LD calls Mar svc mar =wn Air tank no lead rRoul a,^ diesel Amount 5-00 5.00 7.20 1.34 1 - r"; 2.43 3.96 Iffi-5-2 10.52 10.53 35.54 36. 73 161. 74 161.74 2, 445. 00 Lq:;o_ 707.51 parts 402 22.87 2 Map 1989 Claims List Page 2 Thu 12:11 PM City of Mendota Heights Tt-mn Check Number } Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount ) ' tals Temp Check Number 7 ) a Bills Gun Shop 01ammo 160.00 Temp check wmnuer 13 13 Communir-atinns Center, 13 Totals Temp Check Number 13 ' - 160.00 /Totals Temp Check Number a Temp Check Number s � . 9 Battery & Tire Whse 01-4330-440-20 battery 5:3-52 9 Battery & Tire Whse 01-4305-050-50 batteries 301 144.68 27 am5'61 Totals Temp Check Number s Temp Check Number io 10 Board of Water Comm 01-44PS-:�15-nQ Jan 1 -yr! 10 Board of water Comm 08-4335-000-00J an svc 25'21 10 sward of water Comm 01-4*e5-310-70 Jan svc 1e.01 30 112.73 Totals Temp Check Number 10 Temp Check Number 11 11 Pro Tex Inc 01-4305-050-50 Wipes i 11. 013 1i Bro Tex Inc 15-4305-060-60 wipes oo 000 -mw Totals remn.ohecx mmnuer 11 Temp Check Number 12 12 City Motor BUD ly 01-4330-490-50 garts 301-305 54.al 12 City motor Supply 01 -*305-030-30 misc spzvs 29.30 12 City motor ounpzv -- 01-4305-070-70 misc snzvs e9.30 ------ /Temp Check Number' 1e ' ' ' Temp check wmnuer 13 13 Communir-atinns Center, 13 Totals Temp Check Number 13 ' - 2 Mae- 1989 Claims List Page 3 Thu 12:11 PM City of Mendota Heights i T�mn rhf-n 11 Number 14 Temp. } ,s Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount 14 Continental Safety Eq 01 MMIYG 146-00 14 146.00 Temp Check Number 15 15 Dennis Delmont 01-4410-020-20 15 Dennis Delmont 01-4415-020-20 30 Totals Temp Check Number 15 Temp Check Number 16 a17h i f— 01 16 Number Temp Check Number 17 17 Dictaphone 01=4330-440-20 i 17 Totals Temp Check Number 17 Check NumhRr 1A 18 Dodd Technical Corp 01-4301-110-10 clothing exp Mar allowance dict rprs 120.87 120.00 240.87 34.55 78.56 78.36 ventura 2-0 395.00 395. 00 ToI I tals Temp Check Number 18 Temp Check Number i9 9 Electrn Watchman 19 —Totals 7emn Check NuriihFw- Temp Check Number 20 20 Grant Englemann 01-4415-200-70 20 Totals Temp Check Number 20 Temp Check Number. 21 21 Fisc hers Gas 01-4330-445-40 mileage 2-11thru23 150 150.00 8.57 8-57 tire rpr CEO - 6.00 24 Gardner Hdwe 24 Gardner Hdwe 24 Gandns-r WHwm 72 Tntal-_ Temp Chf-ck Number Temp Check Number 05 01-4305-050-50 01-4305-070-70 4 misc tools ig. 50 19.50 58.60 25 Goodyear Service Store 01-4330-440-20 rprs 2243 240.82 z:5 240.82 Totals Temp Check Number 25 Temp Check Number 26 26 Jim Hatch Sales 01-4330-460-30 misc parts 108.50 26 Jim Hatch Sales 01-4330-490-50 miso parts 285.03 52 393.53 1____Tntalc; _TL=Mp h U Nu her PrI Temp Check Number 27 27 Hdwe Hank 01-4305-030-30 27 Totals Temp Check Number 27 Ts -mm Che�k Number 28 28 1 C M A R C 01-2072 misc splys 11.96 2/24 payroll 107.70 2 Mar 1989 Claims — ` Ci Thu 12:11 PM City of Mendota Heights Te-mp ChF-nk Number 21 Temp Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount Qtal-_ Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 22 22 Kevin Frazell 01-4415-110-10 Mar allowance 175.00 22 175.00 Totals Temp Check Number k Numb-- 2n 22 23 G 0 A Corp M n A Corp 01-1210 2tt 1 lt7i oil/grease drum credit 377.50 40- 00ci- F—46 Tr,tal-- T, -mm Check Number 337.50 Temp Check Number 24 24 Gardner Hdwe 24 Gardner Hdwe 24 Gandns-r WHwm 72 Tntal-_ Temp Chf-ck Number Temp Check Number 05 01-4305-050-50 01-4305-070-70 4 misc tools ig. 50 19.50 58.60 25 Goodyear Service Store 01-4330-440-20 rprs 2243 240.82 z:5 240.82 Totals Temp Check Number 25 Temp Check Number 26 26 Jim Hatch Sales 01-4330-460-30 misc parts 108.50 26 Jim Hatch Sales 01-4330-490-50 miso parts 285.03 52 393.53 1____Tntalc; _TL=Mp h U Nu her PrI Temp Check Number 27 27 Hdwe Hank 01-4305-030-30 27 Totals Temp Check Number 27 Ts -mm Che�k Number 28 28 1 C M A R C 01-2072 misc splys 11.96 2/24 payroll 107.70 Totals Temp Check Number 31Ti-mn Check Numbe� 32aa Thomas Knuth 69-4+15-866-00 '32 Thomas Knuth 05 -4415 -105 -IS F32 Thomas Knuth 05-4415-105-15 Totals Temp Check 2 Mal, 1989 Claims -cis Temo Check PAd—eP5 :33 Thu 12:11 pm ci«v of Mendota Heights � 33 Krechs Office Office_-Machinp-- Machines 01-4300-110-10 01-4300-0:30-30 ) L -rap. --- Krechs wreo»s Office machines 01 -4300 -040 -*0 oo Number vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount ) Manbines 05-4200-105-15 33 Krechs Office F-56 Temp Check Number es 15-4300-060-60� > 29.1-nver Hills Community College 01-4400-150-30 regr Kaiser 87.00 ~- ^~~^~^ E^ec`'~''^^~ 01-4620-020-20 29 87.00 Totals Temp Check Number en Temn Check Number 30/ 30 Paul Kaiser :30 Paul Kaiser 01-4268-150-30 01-441-5-0-30-30 Feb svc Feh fflilL-ans:- 624.00 19- 90 -- am TnfAl-- Number Temp Check -A 3L _-___- aoa-9w )Temp Check Number 31 31 Knutson Rubbish Service -- 31 08-+335-000-00 Feb svc e4.6e ----- 24.E2 Totals Temp Check Number 31Ti-mn Check Numbe� 32aa Thomas Knuth 69-4+15-866-00 '32 Thomas Knuth 05 -4415 -105 -IS F32 Thomas Knuth 05-4415-105-15 Totals Temp Check Number 3e Temo Check Number :33 33 Krechs Office Office_-Machinp-- Machines 01-4300-110-10 01-4300-0:30-30 33 aa Krechs wreo»s Office machines 01 -4300 -040 -*0 oo xrechs office machines 01-4300-060-80 33 Krechs Office Manbines 05-4200-105-15 33 Krechs Office Machines 15-4300-060-60� Totals Temp Check Number oo ~- ^~~^~^ E^ec`'~''^^~ 01-4620-020-20 Project mileage 11-e5 March allowance 10.00 2'A- 45 ` Copier toner I. Radar unit ...,.__.. _-Marr 2 1989 Claims List Pacie Thu 12:11 PM City of Mendota Heights Temg Check Number be - Temp. Check Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount _ otals Temp Check Number 34 } Temp Check Number 35 35 L E.L S 01-2075 Mar dues 175.50 175.50 Totals Temp Check Number 35 Check Number 36 36 Guy Kullander 01-4268-650-10 mileage reimb 28.35 P-70 , Guy Ku I I ander 3E 36 Guy Kullander 01 -441S -MAO -AO 01-4490-109-09 9.67 36 Guy Kullander 01-4268-085-85 " 17.78 5 63 79 Guy Kulland;-r 36 Guy Kullander 10-4490-000-00 05-4415-105-15 Mileaoe reirn --- 20.47 o84.60_ Totals Temp Check Number 36 } D Check N!Amber 37 37 L M C I T HP 01-2074 Mar prem 339.01 74 Total-- Temp Check Number :37 1,033.21 Temp Check Number 38 38 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 39 League Mn Cities 39 Leanue Mn Cities 78 Totals Temp Check Number [Temp Check Number 40 Lees Bldg Mtcn 40 Totals Temp Check Number 40 01-4330-460-30 - rprs 2282 38 01-4400-110-10 01-4400-109-09 9 1 08-4335-000-00 40 438. 88 438. 88 1989 Leg Conf 55.00 0 55.00 Feb cing svc 110.00 760.50 760.50 c 2 Mal- 1989 Claims List Page 7 - Thu 12:11 PM City of Mendota Heights cher 41 -- ? Ternp. Check Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount -F ? 5 41 143.85 t Temp Check Number 42 42 MedCenters H P 42 MedCenters H P 42 Mgdrgnt rc H P 42 MedCenters H P } 42 MedCenters H P rs H P 42 MedCenters H P 42 MedCenters H P 01-2074 01-4131-110-10 AS -4121-105-15 01-4131-020-20 01-4131-040-40 01 -413 1 -050-91A 15-4131-060-60 01-4131-070-70 336 Totals Temp Check Number 42 Temp Check Number 43 43 Matra Area Mgr Acorn 43 Ilp Check Number Temp Check Number 44 44 Metro Waste 'Control 15-4448-060-60 44 Metro Waste Control 15-3615 44 Metro Wa5te Control 15-4449-060-60 44 Metro Waste Control 17-3575 IF Totals Temp Check Number 44 Temp Check NUmber 45 Midwest Photo 45 Svc 01-4305-020-20 45 Totals Temp Check Number 45 Temp Check Number 46 46 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-2074 46 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-4131-020-20 46 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-4131-070-70 Mar prem p MAY, orern u Mar prem O Feb sac anus adm fee March instal 1,147.60 1,163.05 704-40 2,274.55 410.00 894- A5 190.45 294.40 7,079.30 10.50 10.50 19, 550. 00 195.50cr 33,,118. 04 2, 796. 08cr 49. 676. 46 Feb film devlp 39.78 . o 39.78 20. Mar nem 5.10 1.70 " 138 - - -- 27.20 Totals Temp Check Number 46 49 Minnesota Teamsters Loc 320 01-2075 Mar dues 182_00 AIM 182.00 Totals Temp Check Number 49 D Check Number 50 50 New England Business Svc,Inc 01-4300-110-10 50 New Ennland Business Svc Inc 01-4300-020-20 50 New England Business Svc Inc 01-4300-050-50 50 New England Business Svc Inc 01-4300-070-70 50 New England Business Svc Inc 05-4300-105-15 50 New England Business Svc Inc 15-4300-060-60 -�mrh Cont forms envelopes Cont form envglopQs- 63. 70 __63._7_0 63.75 63.70 63.78 63.70 Totals Temp Check Number 50 Temp Check Number 51 Northern 01-4330-490-70 wrenches 17.99 51 17.99 Totals Temp Check Number 51 - Temp Check Number - 52 -`�- 52 Dakcrest Kennels @1-4221-8@@-90 Feb Svc 95.@@ i - 2 Mai- 1989 Claims List Page 8 Thu 12:11 PM City of Mendota Heights T --p Check Number- 47 Temp. Check µ Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount } I1esc&a_BeYef --- 01-P074 Mar prem 1 A 4 E-12 _.- 47 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-4131-110-10 245.70 47 Minnesota Benefit Assn 05-4131-105-15 320,55 +- 47 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-4131-050-50 112.27 47 Minnesota Benefit Assn 47 Minnesota Benefit Assn 15-4131-060-60 01-4131-070-70 Mar Prem 12.85 iV14-99 47 Minnesota Benefit Assn 23-1145 Mar prem 60.00 6 1,767.05 Totals Temp Check Number 47 f Check Num ^ .48 --- 48 Minnesota B1ueDrint 05-4305-105-15 blueline 183.13 �- 48 Minnesota Blueprint 10-4300-000-00 RE F'ark Ref 22.84 48 Minnesota Blueprint 411 Minnesota Blueprint 01-4490-080-80 Q1-4nMQ-OAO-AQ update City base map 260.44 148.46 -- 240 Totals Temp Check Number 48 666.97 } Temp Check Number 49 49 Minnesota Teamsters Loc 320 01-2075 Mar dues 182_00 AIM 182.00 Totals Temp Check Number 49 D Check Number 50 50 New England Business Svc,Inc 01-4300-110-10 50 New Ennland Business Svc Inc 01-4300-020-20 50 New England Business Svc Inc 01-4300-050-50 50 New England Business Svc Inc 01-4300-070-70 50 New England Business Svc Inc 05-4300-105-15 50 New England Business Svc Inc 15-4300-060-60 -�mrh Cont forms envelopes Cont form envglopQs- 63. 70 __63._7_0 63.75 63.70 63.78 63.70 Totals Temp Check Number 50 Temp Check Number 51 Northern 01-4330-490-70 wrenches 17.99 51 17.99 Totals Temp Check Number 51 - Temp Check Number - 52 -`�- 52 Dakcrest Kennels @1-4221-8@@-90 Feb Svc 95.@@ i - a Md$- 1989 Cl -aims -List page=9 Thu 12:11 PM City of Mendota Heights Temp Check Number Tern p. Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount 104 105.00 Temp Check Number 53 53 Timothy O'Neill 08-4490-000-00 Totals Temp Check Number 53 Tern- Chmck Njimhs-t, '54 54 O'Brien Sheet Metal 08-4620-000-00 54 Totals Temp Check Number 54 Temp Check Number 55 55 Temp Check Number 56 56 Sanitary Products Co 08-4335-000-00 56 .Totals Temp Check Number 57 Temp Check Number 58 58 Shaw Lumber co 58 Totals T Check Number C H sign delvy 65. 00 A_, M M air balancing C H 2,250.00 mats Feb svc 2,250.00 18.55 172.70 172.70 1,104.50 95.60 156.65 236.30 791.20 196.40 2,655.00 Totals Temp Check Number 56 T--- Check Number 57' 57 L E Shaughnessy Jr 01-4220-132-10 57 L E Shaughnessy Jr OS -4220-132-15 57 L E Shaughnessy Jr 21-4220-132-00 57 L E Shaughnessy E Jr Jr 16-4220-132-00 57 L Shaughnessy E Shaughnessy Jr 03-4220Li32-00 14-4220-132-00 57 L E Shaughnessy Jr 15-4220-132-60 .Totals Temp Check Number 57 Temp Check Number 58 58 Shaw Lumber co 58 Totals T Check Number C H sign delvy 65. 00 A_, M M air balancing C H 2,250.00 mats Feb svc 2,250.00 18.55 172.70 172.70 1,104.50 95.60 156.65 236.30 791.20 196.40 2,655.00 2 Mao^ 1989 C1`aiins List -Page f0^ Thu 12:11 PM City of Mendota Heights Temp Check NUmber Temp. Check Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount 1 446-19 .. 59 446.19 I T Temp Check Number 60 60 Sound Acoustics 08-4620-000-00 microphone 8 stand 219.95 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 60 61 St Paul Book & Stationery '61 St Paul Book ' nnery 01-4300-110-10 05-4-300-105-19 mise splys 21.45 19- Si21 122 T�fAl� Temp Check Number 40.95 Temp Check Number 62 �- 62 Star Tribune 05-4240-105-15 Engr aid ad 68.51462 C Totals Temp Check Number 62 Tep Check umber ? 63 Sun Newspapers 58-4240-863-00 hrg notice 88-6 94.88 63 5un NewsMaQers 51-4240-861-00 Hra notice 88-4 .1r _ 26 Jl 188.00 atals Temp Check Number3 — Temp Check Number 64 64 U 5 West Communications 01-4210-030-30 Feb svc 110.92 64 U S West Communications 01-4210-050-50 35.48 64 U S West Communications 15-4210-060-60 35.47 64 U S West Communications 01-4210-070-70 35.47 64 U S West Communications 01-4210-070-70 222.24 _ — 320 439.58 Totals Temp Check Number 64 Temp Check Number 65 65 F --Totals Tmmn Check Number 231.25 i Totals Temp Check Number erk Nitmhar 68 VWR Scientific 68 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 69 TT ric�r'F'' 69 Tntal-- Temp rhF-r-.k Number Temp Check Number 70 67 01-4410-020-20 68 Lab coats 37.25 37.25 150.50 70 R B Whitacre Co -'^ 01-4330-215-70 mise splys 40.13 70 _ 40 13 Totals Temp Check Number 70 Temp Check Number 71 _., 2 2 P'8r 1989 Cla rns List 71 Winthrop Page 1-1 Weinstine Thu 12:11 PM City of Mendota Heights & & Weinstine Weinstine .•z 71 Winthrop & Weinstine 16-4220-120-00 01-4221-1=0-10 mp- Check _N mb 12 A & & Wt, instine Weinstine 01-4220-120-80 71 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4220-120-30 01-4220-120-30 71 Winthrop 71 Winthrop Temp. Check Weinstine Weinstine 01-4222-120-20 Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount Check Number _ .,. 71 66 United Central Trustee 01-4132-020-20 Mar prem 28.32 66 United Central Trustee 01-4132-050-50 Mar prem 18.88 1 264 122.74 Temp Check Number 67 4 67 United Way 01-2070 Mar contr 109_20 } Totals Temp Check Number erk Nitmhar 68 VWR Scientific 68 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 69 TT ric�r'F'' 69 Tntal-- Temp rhF-r-.k Number Temp Check Number 70 67 01-4410-020-20 68 Lab coats 37.25 37.25 150.50 70 R B Whitacre Co -'^ 01-4330-215-70 mise splys 40.13 70 _ 40 13 Totals Temp Check Number 70 Temp Check Number 71 71 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4220-120-80 01-4'220-120-80 71 Winthrop 71 Winthrop & & Weinstine Weinstine 01-4220-120-80 71 Winthrop & Weinstine 16-4220-120-00 01-4221-1=0-10 71 Winthrop 71 Winthrop & & Wt, instine Weinstine 01-4220-120-80 71 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4220-120-30 01-4220-120-30 71 Winthrop 71 Winthrop & & Weinstine Weinstine 01-4222-120-20 639 Totals Temp Check Number _ .,. 71 Jan Re Airport litigation Tan RP, Ho urs. of nn--in;-c= Jan Re Adult use ord Jan Re Furlong addn_ .Tan retaing" photo copies Jan Re Fire Relief Assn Jan Re Krech Jan prosecutions 1,785.00 675. 00 775.00 308.00 500_ L71 0 60.60 106. 00 120 00 1,324.29 5,53.SC) _ r I =`2f- -r 1389 Claims`L-ist Fuge 12 Thu 12:11 PM City of Mendota Heights i mR—Ch?rk N�irnl�er 71 --- Temp. Check Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount _•1 ate- 91DL 52 +- Grand Total MANUAL CHECKS 12019 150.00 Mn Dept of Health Plan check 88-6 12020 10.00 Mn Document Div Manual PD 12 1 4957.00 U S. Postice REcycling return postage 12022. 333.33 It It permit 12023 950.00 Life Sign Design EmIlems F. D. or ar ap er B0- 2/28 meeting - -} 12025 6,380.18 PERA 2/10 payroll 12026. 10,696.52 Dakota County Bank 2/24 FIT, FICA, MEDICARE 2027 8/b.UU 2/24 payroll deductions 12028 2,784.70 SCCU till 12029 34,595.50 City M.H. Payroll Acct 2/24 net payroll 57,300.20 G. T. 143,201.72 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 2, 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council and Cit dat ator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Sutmer,Variance Case No. 89-04 DISCUSSION: At their February meeting the Planning Commission consi llered a two foot side yard variance request from Mr. William S I btmer (see attached staff memo). The Planning Commission discussed with Mr. William Sutm r a fence encroachment on his property, a power pole that to be removed and the possibility of altering his remodeling lans to allow for the extra two feet to remove the need for he variance. The Commission was convinced of the reasonab eness and necessity of the variance. RECOMMENDATION• The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend the Council grant the two foot side yard variance. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council decides to implement the Planning Commission recommendation they should pass a motion granting a two side yard variance for 1789 Victoria Road. t foot CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Planning Commission February 22, 11 FROM: James E. Danielson and Paul R. Berg Public Works Director Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Variance— Sutmer, 1789 Victoria Case No. 89-04 DISCUSSION: Mr. William Sutmer, 1789 Victoria Road has made application for foot variance to construct a two car garage addition within 8 feet o side property line. Staff made a site visit and noticed that if an existing fence 1 on the property line -Mr. Sutmer's site plan would not be accurate. contacted Mr. Sutmer and he informed us that the fence encroaches on property by 4feet. 2 As e his were The applicant has submitted a letter of consent from his affec ed neighbor. ACTION REQUIRED:_ Review the request with the applicant and make a recommendatio to the City Council. Case No.L� L CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA `• • . . ,•,#I'� #•iii i, a<' APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION ; OF PLANNING BEQUEST ' ;. Date of Application 10 Fee Paid Applicant Name: 5v L M ' , Last First Initial Address: a • 'S7�ctarz Number & Street City State Zip `.. Telephone Number Ft 452 - 1358z Owner Name: '.f Last Address: to Number & Street First Initial City State Zip • , ' I Street Location of Property in Question: t T �# Legal Description of Property; ►r ' `!-!'r f Type of Request: ik • Rezoning '':• ,.. Variance!`*.,. ? : i ct,•, a' r f ' • ,�4!'� ;r' •,', Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Minor Conditional. Use Permitk# +' >°a� `Y `*4AF 1_11 { t• I: t Subdivision Approval - Plan roval ) ' { ' ' ?i" Plan Approval Wetlands Permit Other ... •. v . , tt �' ' r )k•' .. <S'i',N '�<tiff �.f '�' •!.i�� 's#fy \' `, , n rl ''�' r, �t+1'<Y # k#', • y � '}`sC :dal K'+,,} •# <: �t <. ' .. < , r:,.;t ,•IS •# I , r /---->a--z-I i I �t �Z moor VdgANCC- loo 8� WITR PRO- 6o*s9D AvcsloN-- 0 VARIANCE) 10� MIN. PrR CODA 1.1'7 s YlCTOA Ro,4P 28 February 1989 William Sutmar Northwest Corner Avenue and Vic sketch) - Approval of Var Yard Setback l. The Sutrnaro own and occupy a single-family residence at ' Vidtoria Roadv which is the second house from the corner, Marie, on the peat side of Victoria (see attached sketch). was originally constructed with a 12 foot, one oar garage on 2. .The Sutmar's lot is large with lOO feat of frontage on Victoz feet of depth. The north side of the garage' is 28 haot fron property line. . 3. Mr. Sutnmar proposes to convert the existing 12 foot gar., family room and attach a double garage. To maintain setback with a 28 foot nide yard the maximum width of would be 18 feat. Typically, most double garages vary from 24 feet in width. He proposes to build the garage 20 fom| which would require a variance from the 10 foot setback tc setback on the north side of the garage. . ' 5. Mr. Sutmar has discussed this with his neldhbor, Gerald Brow signed a statement indicating his approval for a 8 foot set Brown's house occupies a lot which is 109.43 feet in width. edge of his house is 14 faoi from his south property line. notes in his conversation with Mr. 5utnmor that he feels the . of this additional two car garage to Mr. 5utrnar^o -house w/ the value of his residence. This is probably true since hovb house contiguous normally has a positive affect on honn valuations. 6. In summary, the hardship is the inadequacy of an 18 foot A 20 foot double garage will work if small oars are used. garages are at least 22 feet in width. of Marie oria (see .789 South north of The house the north a and 260 the north � into a lO foot is garage ! feet to in width, a 8 foot , who has ack. Mr. The south 0r. Brown )notruction I increase I a larger and lot da garage. oot double - • 1 w f 1, • `• Q `� ,• • • w / • j• • a / I 1! MARIE AVENUE cc SUBJECT PROPERTY �W PARK • ; Q Z NORTH • SCALE 1 "=400' • AVENUE •• . 6U 2U 2U p • • • • • SU 2U cr_• • • • Qpp • fit' • i • U •/ 6U U 2U • • • �rN ./ • i Q • ! / • • 2 • • t � ! r • • •/ � 6U 2 ! � • � • ! �� tsU 2 map 2U2 • 00 • • J 4U 2 2 • JI ELEMENTARY W • Q • • • / 5U 52U sUOLIC I va • ��' • • • !� O Z / • • 6U � t cc • • • • / , . • a i� * • • • i • • • DOUR c y • • t VICTORIA • AY AV N • s ` • C i . • • _ ' • • • —CROWN C CL Q E • i • A a w . ,, S T A�T E N 1 G N e v L 3 1j �o z 7 �: « 2r 23 v b , f - �• . Ll u R `do cS o° 39 3 I o 0 0 6. ^ 3 I a -c 02 o Q J 14 ° t 040 15 s� z o0 2af c `t 9 r, r ro O 4 s 70 1 : n a ♦ 14200 O b 2 z0zoto' 399. /e sr C7,* z000i 17 144 / ^ a Q c o Seel 4 E • 9 �^ cRod •° 37 3 W 4 o S ^ Z Z ,t 2 f 2 02~ SP'�o S804J srE v J y /I p �L ° .3L ..3a9"E�i X90{� ♦ / `C / Z 2 2 Z .23 � 3 Z/ 4j se a0'e�z s o J�vc ` y i� ¢O 3S o ) �aati o' •°i,Jr qu Zo Z31 * J ` Z ° /8G 2 ti J 24 3qt h - o� ?oes. -sxvaasc'w �2s1.s9- / ° n ^ . 100 OO ..I 196 a 3100,1 / ti o o ZZ ZS • �3 h / ooa v ° Is �/ «; 33 • � o s s �d o c �• 1r� 7e r v G- k, ! a ' .1114 c /G o % 2G ° 3Z ° /7 a So ♦ - rI tj w cl S/ I z 5 ° L 7 I a G? /� V • e v S4 •+'� 3/ S0 �O IG ro rr e a o -.(Z ♦ 1 2 I 9�- o � • 28 ►S4oS` / y h S? ti 1 rte• QD y /8 3 o u C1 29 1h; 4C I LYS ti pro r L LM / v r � pOUGG AS O � -� z 2 .t. . /Z 7.33 tfJ e� .14o w Z2S o 0 :"E>- 3 / 31 0 A :) 4 34 ; 4 S G 7 u3 t zoo .70.39 - o ed 1A O= P �°• 77 r 020-55 c w.— 2' O�r /)It) // 23 N LU Q �0 a N to 2 Ef t .t v o "0-55 24 �UTLOT 1 fa" Z `\ \ t Zto /n Lu Z) 25 u l 2S2 4: a Pi4/E'K O O < 27 25 Ik s v CLL r TLOT i,' /tet ♦ J Ou A w o 0 ` 2. 0 1 4.3o. s8 zco OUTLOT ial.%I IX 4 t' F 1 2 ALL M a 5 ;p MEnIf�OT•3 HEIGHTS V, x A DITION Q 020-54 -54 4- OZ2--75' _ 00e- - SUBJECT PROPERTY __ - -- - — - NORTH SCALE 1'1=200' __ o d 1 { t i i F CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO x, z. March 2, 1989 ' TO: Mayor, City Council and City �irator 7' FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Schaefer/Tilsen Subdivision Case No. 89-06 DISCUSSION• At their February meeting the Planning Commission conidered a request from the Schaefers and Tilsens to grant a subdivision request (see attached memo). RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to waive th it requirement for a public hearing and to recommend app oval of the requested subdivision. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the Planning Commissin's recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting Re olution 89- , RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT SUBDIVISION AT THE INTERSECTION OF DOUGLAS ROAD AND DOUGLAS COURT. I City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89 - RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT SUBDIVISION AT THE INTERS DOUGLAS ROAD AND DOUGLAS COURT WHEREAS, Mr. &•Mrs. Tilsen and Mr. & Mrs. Schaefe joint owners of.Lot 5 Block 1, Tilsen's Highland Heigh No. 3, have submitted a request to subdivide lot 5 di.a and attach the newly created parcels to their adjacent and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said lot subdivision and finds the same to be.in order.. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City C of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, a 3 'i f CON OF i Plat anally Lots ncil That the subdivision of Lot 5 Block 1, Tilsen's H'ghland Heights Plat No. 3 submitted at this meeting be and th same is hereby approved. Adopted by the City Council of the City'of Mendota Heicjhts this 7th day of March, 1989. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By arses t. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk sotto Mayor i t t i Case No W,j .5( 0 2- kJ lj.� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS' COUNTY, MINNESOTA, t -if.' vi"; '-IAPPLICATIONj�QRJCONSIDERATION OF" E PLANNING -R,. QY�STj I q.f A .41), 0" .,Da t?,; of Applicatton I il Fee Pa id 0.11 11f ant If �Z,� Z i i, I P -Owner 'Tt on"I" I it I , , i". ", ;, .. - , #Name:'-- CHAEFER S 1QqFPH M. Last tJ -1 nitial 55118 V val �,,Address:` 299 KOPP DR. W. ST. PAUL, MINN t Zi p Number & Stre9� 51 State h #41U "i ilifl- Telephone Number: 451-3839 T. .1,'Owner -Applicant 'TILSEN. SCOTT Last First Initial i.p �!i-- Address: 1765 0 U GLAS 'CT.'- MENDOTA HGTS MINN 55118 -J, Number & Street City State Zip S �reet Location -of Property in,-Q'uestion: �)Vj 1636 DOUGLAS ROAD LegalnDescrip t ion', of 'Property:1.1" q L 1 TILSEN!S-.,HIGHLAND'HE-IGHTS,,,PLAT NO. 3 OT 5.* BLO.CK- Y 7 u ype"to N col A0 MR i, t. ill, 4 11 --N Rezoning � ... 1. , % q .uest: ov'r -Va iance- �Conditional Use Permit' Conditional Use Permit for.P U.D.' f Minor Conditional Use Permit :.Subdivision'Approval' . , I. ).:ir f� I V ) I ", I I - .0; 1 't f x Approval f "11 TIttli" W, t, ds Ierm�t Wet an *N,o, I biql-', 0,.v fie f" i, Otber--!,� vp im, -if ...... I I I I) A i to bildi V! de'�'� ne run'n'ing fr�m the northwesternmost yta,mdiagonaf., J `o4heastern r*of Lot 5 to its"s most corner. 4 k diol", -A 4 ? if h if a fft"i 1I I b P. .,71 b(10% CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Planning Commission February 22, FROM: James E. Danielson and Paul R. Berg Public Works Director Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Schaefer/Tilsen Split Case No. 89-07 DISCUSSION: i 1989 f Joseph and Linda Schaefer and Scott and Jan Tilsen jointly ow Lot 5, Block 1, Tilsen's Highland Heights Plat No. 3. They are requestingpermis- sion to divide Lot'5 equally and attach those divided portions to Bots 6 and 7 (see attached letter and drawing). The division as proposed conjorms to the exception of the subdivision ordinance which allows the Plannirg Commis- sion to waive the public hearing for platted lots when the divisio results in new lots that totally conform to the subdivision ordinance. ACTION REQUIRED:" Review proposed lot split with applicants and make a reco City Council. ation to ^ , PLANNING REPORT ' [ATE: CASE NUMBER APPLICANT: LOCATION: ' ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: l. 28 February 1989 Joseph Schaefer Tllsen Southwest Corner Road and Douglas Lot Division ` � � and Scott ' ` of Douglas Court (see � ' ' , Mr. Schaefer and Mr. Tilsen own Lot 6 and Lot 7 of Blo 1, Tilsen's Highland Heights Third Addition. This addition is located in the west area of the Highland Heights subdivision, east of Lexington Avenue, and less than 1/4 mile north of Ma ' rie Avenue. They both owii Lot 5 and propose to divide it equally and attach it to Lots 6 and 7. 2. It is normal for communities in the Metropolitan Area to consistently receive requests for the division of two lots into three increasing the density and the value. Hero, we have the They propose to 'take the two lots, each of which are 22,800 square feet (Lot 61 and 24,200 square feet (Lot 7), and add ono -half of 8'225 square feet (Lot 5) to each lot. | ` 3. Attached is a drawing illustrating this proposed division. The result will Given the pressure for economic values of single-family lots as they diminish over time, there is pressure to develop and d vide existing parcels where additional lots can be created. Thus, we could predict that over the next 20 years, these owners may well put L)t 5 back on the market because of its potential value. At the moment, however, it seems reasonable to allow the division of Lot 5 diagonally as indicated by the dotted line on the attached survey. I IF ` MAYFIELD HG S Lj&_ -• Oct SUBJECT PROPERTY • + DOUGLAS OAD• Q ` NORTH '• . _ SCALE 1 "=400' :::r.:::; : :: ,,;< _ • • + .J _ ♦.•• + MAKI KING LEY AVEN PARK .177 0 cc0 • O • 4T F.. • L_..,. —MARIE AVENUE " ;1 • r -Il co • • PL CE BWANA • • • + + Q t J � + + C? • + • ` DRIVE o• • , I • • MENDOTA ELEMENTARY • M", J SCHOOL I PUBLIC! 0 • 1!• WEST CIRCLE • Cr • 1 • / ( W CT. O , •, i \z « + ` . cul FEBRUARY 8, 1989 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS GATS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA DEAR SIRS: JOSEPH M. AND LINDA A. SCHAEFER AND SCOTT AND JAN TILSEN JOINTLY OWN LOT 5, BLOCK 1, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND IIEIGATS PLAT NO. 3. THEY WISH AT THIS TIME TO DIVIDE LOT 5 AS SHOWN IN THE ENCLOSED PLANS*SO THAT HALF OF LOT WILL NOW BELONG TO LOT 7 WHICH IS OWNED BY SCOTT AND JAN TILSEN AND HALF OF LOT 5 WILL BELONG TO LOT 6 WHICH IS OWNED BY JOSEPH AND LINDA SCHAEFER. ENCLOSED ALSO PLEASE FIND SOIL TEST DONE ON LOT 6 BY GEOTECHNICA1 ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR THE SCHAEFER'S. *Lot 5 to be divided by a diagonal line running from the northwe ternmost corner of Lot 5 to its southeasternmost corner. THANK YOU, J SEPIt M. SCIiAE ER SCOTT TILSEN 5.,1,� ! ! DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LANDSUnVEYOR Relmotoo Unoor Law♦ of Tne State of M,nnefoU 2971 - 145TH STREET W. - BOX M ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068 PHONE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE LAS 135.0 4483 • r� � O lOT o LOT ►6.�-` fni 5 r, 6 135.0 ?o aQ LOTwee Al fit 25.0 M O O /CP' / p 01 �! r � 0 `b' 612 423.1769 t c • r ,.;.. ;• .. .. 1. s ;, , . w rr ,'r 'rrf. t] f,r. of d Ott: V' , 0'' i lw L. T.:r1:i/x: tu— i/)LL .. !1. '::'i�� . .':' f ri 1 . f„11i :IC .•:tJ�:'.�{�i' t: l: Tll::i c/1.irJ'-� I1CG')i'U�rli� to N.^. : i1:'�'' �'CE: �f,'.r li�� i.�.::1 :ii i) i):]; 'Jf� J�'..li•:1:r! � ] iij•j. t 61fNNESOTA nEE ISTRATION NO 56755 f i - i CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 2, 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council and CityKd/)iq1trator FROM: James E. -Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Kuross Lot Division Case No. 89-08 DISCUSSION• At their February meeting the Planning Commission consic a request from Mr. Art Kuross to subdivide Lot 2, Block Val's Addition and increase the size of Outlot A (see attached staff memo) Mr. Kuross has to be out of town the Council meeting date so I told him that I would atte to answer Council questions for him. RECOMMENDATION• The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the requested lot division. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the Planning Commission recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolu 89 - , RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOT DIVISION OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, VAL'S ADDITION. 11 t :ion 0 k City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89 - RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOT DIVISION OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, VAL'S ADDITION WHEREAS, Mr. Arthur Kuross, owner of Lot 2, Block 1 Val's Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota has requested f the City to divide a portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Val's Addition according to a survey prepared by Demars-Gabrie Land Surveyors, Inc. and dated February 13, 1989, said portion called Parcel B; and WHEREAS, Parcel B is to be added to Outlot A, Val' Addition; and om WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said lot division and finds the same to be in order. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Co ncil of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, that the lot division submitted.at this meeting be and the same is he eby approved. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heighs this 7th day of March, 1989. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, Ci y C er CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By es E. Mertensotto, yor } i CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO February 22, 1 TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson and Paul R. Berg Public Works Director Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Kuross Lot Division Case No. 89--08 DISCUSSION: Mr. Art Kuross, the developer of Val's Addition, was asked by th n City when he was platting his land to provide land access to a previously and locked piece of property. Mr. Kuross agreed to the City's request acreated Outlot A which accomplished the request (see attached drawing). Mr. d Paster the owner of this previously land locked property now desires o have a wider strip for access than was platted. Increasing the size of the trip does not adversely affect Lot.2 from which the land is being taken. taff feels that this division falls within the "exception" to the subdivis on ordinance and may be processed without a public hearing. ACTION REQUIRED:_ Review the requested lot division and make a recommendation to Council on waiving the public hearing and granting the lot division City uest. ^ � � PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: � APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 28 February l989 TM Arthur Kur000 KorthvvauL of (see sketch) Subdivision Approval I. Arthur Kuromo recently submitted, and the City approved, a no an 'araa of land known as \/aln Addition. That plat conolotE lobo in Blocks I and 2, with the potential for an additional fi land not owned by the Applicant. Attached is a copy of indicating this plat with Lot 2 of Block l shadmd in gray. rd Circle At plat for or seven /o bata on a drawing 2. A feature of Vals Addition was the provision for a private access road to a triangular parcel of land Y north of the' plat, -consisting of 1.10 acres. The private roadway was platted as Parcel B and was designed to be 20 feet in width. Due to tree locations and existing and proposed ditching, the 20 foot width proved to be inadequate, therefore, 18 feet of width is proposed. 3. We had suggested to Mr. Kur000 that this right-of-way could be widened through the use of on easement which would not require City approval. The parties involved, however, desire that the parcel be wdaned and that the additional width be transferred by fee title. 4. Thum, the proposal is to amend the original plat to provide 15 feet of additional width for the private right-of-way for the nor mouth Deg. and an additional lO feet of width for the east -west leg. | 5. A copy of a proposed lot division submitted by the applicant should be attached to this report for your consideration. Also attached is a copy of the private roadway as originally platted at 20 feat vvld for both legs of the parcel. | 6. If the roadway is constructed to be 18 feet in width, .-ertainly a right-of-way of 25 feet and 30 feet is not excessive. informs us that he proposes to keep the north -south leg at 25 feet because he does not want to remove the existing trees coitiguous to the west. The east -west leg does not have such critically lo d trees and, therefore, is proposed to be widened an additional lO feet to 30 feet. | 7. have suggested that they may wish to include a angle smallWe where �� ! . �s t. w° tS � x •r� Zs�9 / ttiaa° MEO`�• /\ tp • t• . 49 ♦ S4 511f � � .• � �`hs C, 2t _ ? /SEE C �, \ � 4 >/ ''�f►a �°! _ eNeQ / o .4 50 --tsE ban 's coa —_ , - - �.• V ' s 4 3 f LOT t yyEi� V4 i �o1S9—ti a �• BLOCK i , i~ IB i 1/ I!6 -S 1 LOT I ' Ct t iI r FUTURE i LOTS.lik 9 � c�� gyp•( ._ , , - � 1� ;:;;•.,;.;:<a,• ; . i i = • , �• - ^ •;.;� �� 0 ! .. � • :1� •'try: :;°::..t k I . ! ! .. .. ,�....,.:•: ; HUNTER PART OF '. ..�'�i.y �' • .,_•,..•,••�-�•�c.-� (� ,_.—u-� _i r...^�:__— � \``��/• LOT 3BLUFF �, . ; :>::: G ! -_--. r t; - -♦ - ,.; c'; ;. : 2 'FART OF � jfi;:j� . .I � . Jj � : 2 ' � .. �' � 4 i Ss S9 i t r Lor z vaxt OF i:. ,i'2 ; LOT 1 (i } •k / r_ 1st_ :_1 l.. ._ ... �'�_._. -_= �r � -•r- y_ ', •ti - „if � _..yrt... _ .�. +G�: � ItiX + r•�>,t IwN+. s nl►qq a tots + y VERNA i tt.a�'.f � � 'Jr. PART HUNTS `'"T ' �' f� x . 3 SUBJECT PROPERTY �TNaMA; 6LUFf~ .r I'f�,Bse-rr.,c •....a..i NORTHt� tss'+tiz.rc .ar�� f/7 +3000 .•r p({) ,..•. r: ? !? r1 t r007 '} Z7R"Ct-iARC?.. .SCALE 1"=200' ? _ Iu. — —t� i �+ we .z riitsaea' �btf'S[?� HILL 1 N � �, i " y` ( u to .92.1[4 1 Q2C -08 + O /" /77 L• Li53 =}, + 3r Ac. Is 032-08 040-08 4oe s I '• ;/ 157.25 S`>'h�•� 26C8o-D 260210-A pO 00 171 25 r! a n ,yam t j '4• q N.89 I8'31"E... _co 0. 0-02 ;_-..._____..... 2 ,eo/7C d wife b � S a v 228. 37- ZZ 9. 33 z zA,..S2 48--.46 a 3 a OI 0-07 ♦ C50- 02 //�� ,, - `Q. • t/fr��ri- A. Jml�� l Ac. 060-02 NT 2(a c3 go 24080_s 14 °�' Ac . N1 225..3 aa ti M, v q ° o Z605 020-03 030-03 _ 0!0-03 d a o • u oaf 1, Q0 Xg WERR CIRCLE X1.20 IN 32.5n /Yo0�-4o0%a(W ^ V 1. .4t Til - ., i - .., . . N w '.11, 4� INN, t Ilk" It Case No@ 61 A jig v, it of ;r CITV OF MENDOTA HEMUS 0� STY1 0 !11P :t DAY OTA,,Cuulilx,p,�,MINNbbV'I:A"-- 4 Ila It Yki elk -APPLICATIONFORiiCONSIDERATION.,-'iI I I it; If J, OF UIMOA 1.1V IT. i 14 f It 4�1 ,It FiT i:! ", .1, : , 1� I - ;-'I 'P qING T k)1;Date ofi4ppli at q r.- 151 P id"' .T,,,Fee a e) 40 R in !6, 1.8 's`i- A nt I I, i rD .?I Last irst' I lyl* Initialj 11 14, i I !Nil VP 111. 'S, NO. I - A; "I fill, 1dresss j it umber Stree State 4, i'? th Z ip 901 U 4P R)A""M Ll tr Tale honeiNumbeni 1141 14 it. IPA, First Initial zi '%Number &.Street State Z. J. J: 'S.tre t -Location of .Property, in question:t(iiU-1. m 1 Descriptio Lega a,of 4 Property: 4 ji T+ b L; T ?J*`1 C' Z_ 0 IN, IND I In I 1ITNI 4i. Rezonin U. �01 I'S I' T. jy Request.:lf", W"'Warianic it se Permit. I i Conditional' U* 5 e Conditional,Use Permit'for P.U.D "iMinor.Conditional.Use Fermit'�;I,11 i-Subdivision"Approv al P. l"., W(94 f, P 1 an' Ap p rova I �.Iji i- A "61 4 I. it i T.". !; I I I i � I 7`74etlan,da, Perm t-1 * I � 01-11 other 777 1q, Mot IT ... .... .... *1 � 1�.'n 114. It It 9t, S11 LAN IWO, I'k i. -4!1'11�ti -,I "whW, foviwi ,�3p : r / 51 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT �0-16 •-Z �✓ / M o / tn • •••57.94••• • S 880 52'21" W N 880 52' 21" 45.00 - E 145.00-- 25.00' 20.00 :.►�i_i i �.� i �� F25,0 S 0031'58"E ��N 52 -2 -LE— \ sl o^� �. D1 20 • II I LO � I I � i o 0 QDD L ��^i O cJ I 00 o N 1 I 0 IIf 1 I W I I h20.0 W• N 88°52'21" E I tn I I UZ M I N L• cD I 20 I � Cu z 0 ,�3p : r / 51 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT �0-16 •-Z �✓ / M o / tn • •••57.94••• • S 880 52'21" W a ' • • N 86052'21" E 145.00 - ' ''•25.00•.- ., ___ 20.00 S 0031 '58' E 0 - - - — T- �\ T 95.00 I 5 I PROPOSED ` I i 2 DIVISION i l 20 m in LINES' �• _ • I� s� - W o oU _ i .J 1 O Q �' o I I I • z � I I L7 �.�� I I �_•� s.00,....:.20.00 I I - N 88°52'21•' E 1 PARCEL A I 3 m N I I w ti M IIn O c0 3 I z I 20 M ►� w I o I I hog, J z I / �� I v V / 51 'DRAINAGE AND ortor, EASEMENT o ••57.94••• S 88° 52'21" W I/ ` CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 3, 1� TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: U.S. West Utility Building Location DISCUSSION: Council recently turned down an application from U.S. West to locate a utility building near a pond along Mendota Heights Road. Council id not want to obstruct the view of this pond from Mendota Heights Road. The building was*to house some"state of the art" fiber optics telephone equip- ment and provide that service to the new residents in the Southeast area. The Minneapolis/St. Paul area was selected by U.S. West over sever 1 others as a test case and local U.S. West employees are extremely anxious not to have this opportunity fall through and go to another state. In order to help with a solution Council offered to allow the building to be placed within the Centex Park area. U.S. West therefore met and worked out a location with Centex and then met with staff and Howa d Dahlgren to discuss that location (see attached map). As a result of the meeting with Howard Dahlgren the location was changed from that sh wn on the map to be either east or west of the parking lot near some existin trees. Also at the meeting with Howard several building designs were disc ssed and U.S. West has amended their letter of February 22, 1989 (attached) to agree to consider any one of the following options: 1. Build a park equipment storage room and finished bathrooms. 2. Build a park equipment storage room and an attached shel er area (per Howard Dahlgren design) and pay City $20,000 for laid ease- ment. 3. Build a park equipment storage room, an unfinished bathr om and an attached shelter area (per Howard Dahlgren design). ACTION REQUIRED: Review request with Ken Dahlman U.S. West's representative an deter- mine a course of action. U S WEST Business Resources, Inc. Real Estate Department 100 South 5th Street, Suite 1040 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 I February 22, 1989 Honorable Mayor Esteemed Council Members City Administrator Park Board Commissioner At the February 7, 1989, City Council meeting, I presented a drawing of a proposed building to be considered for joint use by the City and U S WEST park near the Kensington PUD development. I am as] for a meeting with the responsible City officials the developers to determine a joint use plan which feasible and attainable within our timing paramete: The building would be constructed on the park land entirely with U S WEST funds. We would erect the building to our equipment specifications and finis the rest room/storage room facilities to the City' specifications. We have estimated that the cost o the City improvements would be about $23,400. We believe this would be a fair trade off for the acquisition costs. We could also work with the p board to design the building to include a covered picnic area if the City chooses to include one, a expense. U S WEST proposes to lease the land from the City, the building, but in turn, lease the storage/rest area to the City. The City would maintain the exterior of the structure and it's leased area. L WEST would maintain the interior of the equipment area, it's access door, and the roof. We would rE the right to enter the City's premises if necessai maintain the water tight integrity of our premiseE For example, the City would be responsible for the care and repair to the restrooms; however, if a waterline broke, we could enter the restrooms to secure the water line to prevent water damage to c equipment. It is our desire to have the new telephone servic, available to the developers model home at it's scheduled opening in August. .n a :ing tnd is and k its own oom S ain to February 22, 1989 Letter to City of Mendota Heights Page 2 We, therefore, ask for a meeting of the parties, a their earliest convenience, to discuss the issues and reach an agreement on the building design and placement within the proposed park area so that we can proceed with formal City approval of a conditional use permit for this plan. Si er Kenneth L. Dallman Assistant Manager -Real Estate cc: Kevin Clark Dick Putnam 2 US WEST. COMMUNICATIONS : ADKINS ASSOCIATION Ine N t. #74067 - I,h* ARCHITECTS PLANNERS �n rrrrro.�w nr.w. r.niq•nr�a� r tt `4'! r~� iQ:;ice J �i,Y.} .; , � .. •p ', • � � ��''1��, t� is MIN 44) + r AMS . • t, s� { t ,�i�'�P 'ti ••l; Y,��N� ,'.+, 54'x. r�.' ••�'��I ��j �. ' }I .»i Sit" t {'� S � "'•, `;: , • � ' ��,,,,,,jjj ile IF >{ Ir l' ; .�•' �t ��t; �+ ;• .;{,'.+ jRf�.:ii''t-ila'tl�'�,Re..•s' •t!rt�'!�r ` +'+�?}'�`.: i,:;•�yi,it. Vii-+ C �4 ''!�it�f�`,';wV.,,lsl:».�i`r-,�"ri • ;�`{•.dti.• i.• ��. A'i(J� ,r .{Ig. ,.2;: •.�, •411: f� � `•} {1. ,l: ,i• .•• ',,`� �IY• 7. ,t Y��,r, � �. t � t`+ j •� , ;fit, i!ti ►.� � ` x "'!1 1 ..,,. 'l .r�.},,> I,�'r' j•;ti�tdl;sl, l:�{tri'!."+s'.:`... .. t.; 1 �`t WK-:400MIKEW ilk To: From: Re: MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS March 2, Mayor and City Council Kevin Fra/z��,� y Administrator Presentations Concerning N.W. Orient Development in Eagan, Including Traffic Issues Last Fall, John Shardlow, planning consultant to Northw Airlines attended a meeting of the Council to describe development plans on the corporation's campus in Eagan. presentation included a discussion of traffic implicati for the Dodd/494 interchange. John informed Council th City of Eagan was in the process of,completing a traffi study. That study has now been completed, and copy is enclosed Council only). Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works f City of Eagan, will be at the meeting to discuss the re with Council. You will particularly want to focus atte on the new interchange between Dodd and Delaware. Alth that interchange would not provide access into Mendota Heights, it would be located partially in our City and close proximity to our proposed community park. John Shardlow will also be attending the meeting to up Council on Northwest's expansion plans. 1989 That ns t the (for r the ort tion ugh n Ite 4 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 89 - RESOLUTION CONCERNING MENDOTA HEIGHTS/EAGAN AIRCRAFT FLIGHT CORRIDOR WHEREAS, the Cities of Mendota Heights and Eagan have historical the Preferential Runway System at Minneapolis/St. Paul Airport ("N results in 55+% of the departing air traffic coming over the two commui WHEREAS, the• two cities have planned land uses to be expected flight patterns along the I-494 corridor; and ly supported SP"), which ities; and tible with WHEREAS, during the past several years, air traffic has departed significantly from the historically acceptable corridor area, -causing deleterious impact on residential neighborhoods previously unaffected by aircraft noise; and WHEREAS, Mendota Heights has urged the Federal Aviation A ministration ("FAA") control tower at MSP to enforce its departure procedures so as to minimize the noise impact in residential areas, and to the extent that som impact is unavoidable, distribute the impact equitably between Mendota Heights an Eagan; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Airport Commission ("MAC") and . th FAA have failed to enforce the departure procedures and therefore have violated and continue to violate the integrity of the Mendota Heights/Eagan Aircraft Fli ht Corridor ("Corridor"); and WHEREAS, despite ongoing negotiations, the FAA and MAC hav not in any material way modified the departure procedures in current use as to inimize the noise impact on the residential areas of Mendota Heights; and WHEREAS, Mendota Heights believes that pursuant to FAA regulations and Minnesota state statutes, an environmental assessment and, potentially, an environmental impact statement are required for the current departure procedures and the proposed magnetic headings shifts of the Corridor; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Counci ("MASAC") Mendota Heights/Eagan Corridor Operations Committees review and report of the Corridor leaves many questions unanswered. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Cou cil that the City shall take the following actions: Ia. Pursuant to respective state and federal law, submit to the MAC and FAA requests for information in the form set forth in Exhillits A and B, respectively, attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Information Requests"); lb. If necessary, commence litigation by and through its City Attorney to compel compliance with these Information Requests; ` 2. Review the materials produced as of the result of the Information Request and determine the necessity of environmental assessment for any past, present or proposed action; and whether such requisite environment assessments have been or are being performed; 3a. If an environmental assessment is required, prepare and serve on the MAC and FAA, respectively, a demand for performance of said environmental assessment, 3b. If necessary, commence litigation by and through its City Attorney to force the -MAC and FAA, respectively, to perform with the requisite environmental assessment; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City 3f Mendota Heights, that the Council wishes the "15 degree" Operations Cone forte Corridor to be maintained with- turns to the left of no more than ten degrees (1 from the extended runway centerline. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City Heights, that the Council does not support a "28 degree" Operations Corridor which shifts the Corridor northward and places the entire expansion over Mendota Heights. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this March, 1989. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGF By: W,_4e., � Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson )f Mendota ane for the Incremental 7th day of MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS March 2, L989 To: Mayor and City Counc�Iyo? From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistan ,- 5 Re: 1989 Recycling Policies INTRODUCTION At the February 21, 1989 Council meeting, the City Council approved the Rubbish Hauling Ordinance and the provisions within it providing for recycling and the collections thereof. The attached resolution further supplements the ordinance by spelling out the policies we will use to guide recycling in 1989. These supplemental policies may need to be changed as the recycling program matures and therefore it was felt they should be done by resolution instead of by ordinance. DISCUSSION Of primary importance is the payment for col ection of recyclables. If Council approves this resolution, we will reimburse the haulers at the rate of $1.00 per participating household per month. This reimbursement schedule has several attractive components as compared to the alternative of paying by the ton. First, because the City of Mendota Heights is be curbside program on a voluntary basis, by paying the per participating household basis we are providing with the incentive to increase the number of participating, therefore maximizing our progress abatement goals. Second, through our sign-up method we are building a c which we have a list of every household that has a cc is participating. When the haulers submit their reimbursement we can balance the number of householi claiming with the abatement tonnage and city share of that they also have to claim. This gives us an e accurate method of monitoring what we are paying for. Third, the haulers at this stage can only guess ai costs imposed on them by these recycling programs County. Reimbursing on a per participating household sense for budgeting purposes because the numbers ar The City and the haulers can budget more acct realistically. inning its rulers on a the hauler households toward our ata base in ntainer and -eports for is they are recyclables lhanced and the extra in Dakota basis makes s definite. rately and While abatement tons are the ultimate goal of t participating households have been shown to generat amount of tonnage on a consistent basis. If we build of participants, we will get our tonnage. program, a certain ie numbers In summary, payments on a per participating household basis will: 1. Create incentives to maximize households participating 2. Enhance our enforcement and monitoring abilities 3. Inject certainty into our budgeting process Comparisons West St. Paul is also going with a $1.00 per participating household per month payment. Inver Grove Heights is paying $.75 per household per month with the difference being they are paying for every household, whether it is participating or not. They are also using the blanket approach, meaning every household gets a container dumped on the curb. The other cities in Dakota Countyfor the most part are going with a payment of $20 per ton of abated recyclables. No one is quite sure where this rate standard originated or what it is based on. The advantage of a per ton payment is that the incentive is provided, to the hauler, -to maximize tons, which is the ultimate goal of abatement. It is however, very difficult to predict the amount of tons or success in a new program. Also, it is difficult to monitor tonnage as routes and collections cross city boundaries. In conclusion, I feel that the long term success of our recycling program is in creating participation and willingmess to be involved. We have approached this by designing a system that is simple and convenient to become involved in. We will need to build participation and to sustain it if the program is to be successful in the long run. I believe the payment on a per household basis is the best incentive to begin with in our program. We will at the least have the ability to mo itor it and adapt it if necessary. Other Items The rest of the resolution is pretty basic, as it sti ulates what the city's and the hauler's obligations are. This includes delivery of the containers, providing the haulers with lists of participators and making the payment for collection based on the reports required by the Rubbish Hauling Ordinance. ACTION REQUESTED If Council wishes to approve the proposed policy, it should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 89- , "RESOLUTION STABLISHING RECYCLING POLICIES FOR 1989." Y M CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89 - RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING RECYCLING POLICIES FOR (989 WHEREAS, Dakota County and the City of Mendota Heights have entered a Joint Powers Agreement to accomplish landfill abatement programs through recycling; and WHEREAS, -,the Dakota County Board of Commiss'oners has allocated funds to provide a portion of the costs incu red by the City of Mendota Heights to implement and operate a loc 1 curbside recycling program; and WHEREAS, an February 21, 1989 the City Council a proved the Rubbish Hauling Ordinance and the new recycling provisions requiring all licensed haulers to provide recycling se vices; and WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights desires to mplement a curbside recycling program beginning March 27, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY'RESOLVED BY THE City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, that the following be adopted as the City's policy'on the Curbside Recycling Program; 1. Purpose The purpose of this resolution is to provide for cooperation between the City of Mendota Heights and the - liven ed rubbish haulers by establishing policies to implement a Curbside Recycling Program. 2. Term This Resolution shall terminate on December 31, 1989, unless the City of Mendota. Heights, by December 1, 1989 notifies the hauler in writing that the Resolution will be continued, in which case, the Resolution shall then be continued until D cember 31, 1990. 3. Right of Amendment The City of Mendota Heights may amend this resolution, with or without cause, by giving written notice to the licensed hauler, at least 30 days before the effective date of termination. 4. City obligations The City of Mendota Heights shall fulfill the fol owing: a) Containers - The City of Mendota Heights stall supply each hauler a container for every reside tial unit customer who signs up to participate in t e Curbside Recycling Program. The containers remain the property of the City of Mendota Heights. containers which are t lost, stolen, damaged or otherwise in need of replacement will be purchased by the residential unit customer for an amount equal to the cost to the City. b) Participation - The City will provide eaci hauler a list of residential unit customers who have requested containers for recycling. The list will pr vide name, ' address and scheduled day,of service. The City will provide programs to build participation in.the recycling program. 5. Hauler Obligations The licensed haulers in the City of Mendota He ghts shall fulfill the following: a) Containers - The licensed haulers shall distribute the containers to participating customers by leaving the container at the address on the normal sched led day of garbage collection. bj Reports - The hauler shall report to t e City as described in Ordinance #264 (codified as Ordinance #1004), Section 7.12. The City will provide the form necessary for these reports. 6. Payment For Collection On a quarterly basis and based upon the submitted reports by the haulers, the City shall pay the hauler $1.00 per participating household per. month. This payment shall be made within 30 days after the City obtains the scale receipts and the quarterly reports. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Seventh day of March, 1989. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor sights this G9 0 MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS March 2,,1989 To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevinv' City Administrator �. Re: Nomination of Fire Department for 1989 Minnesot Fire Department Community Service Award This May, the Minnesota State Fire School will include the presentation of awards to recognize an individual firefighter, and a fire department that consistently provide an outstanding,level of service to the community. I a suggesting that the Mendota Heights Fire Department be nominated, primarily on the basis of the high-caliber ire prevention program that they now offer each fall. Attached are the nomination materials. Chief Mazcko a d I are working on'collecting additional supporting materi 1 for attachment, such as letters from School District 197, training records, copies of the local fire code, etc. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with my recommendation, it should p motion adopting the attached resolution of nomination. s a k Campus Locations ALBERT LEA ALEXANDRIA ANOKA AUSTIN i BEMIDJI BRAINERD BROOKLYN PARK CANBY DETROIT LAKES DULUTH EAST GRAND FORKS EDEN PRAIRIE EVELETH FARIBAULT GRANITE FALLS HIBBING HUTCHINSON JACKSON MANKATO MINNEAPOLIS MOORHEAD PINE CITY PIPESTONE RED WING ROCHESTER ROSEMOUNT ST. CLOUD ST PAUL STAPLES THIEF RIVER FALLS WADENA WHITE BEAR LAKE WILLMAR WINONA "o Minnesota Technical Institute System State Board of Vocational Technical Education Capitol Square Building 550 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 TO: Chief Executive Officers, Minnesota Cities FROM: Adam D. Piskura, State Director of Fire Training( Fire Information, Research & Education (F.I.R.E.) SUBJ: Nominations for Minnesota Firefighter Community and Minnesota Fire Department Community Servic DATE: - January, 1989 enter J ervice Award Award l The third annual Minnesota Firefighter and Fire Department Com unity Service Awards will be presented during the luncheon at the Minnesota Stto Fire School on Saturday, May 6, 1989. The two. awards are designed to recognize that individual and fire department which consistently provide an outstanding level of service to the community. Tile awards are not intended to recognize heroism, but to reward exemplary selrvice to the community. k - An example of exemplary firefighter service might include the ini iation, design, and implementation of a fire safety public education campaign dir cted toward juveniles or senior citizens. A fire department will be noted for being progressive. In today's rapidly changing society, public safety organizations must modify existing service or provide additional support to their communities. Having personnel available for functions other than fire suppression (e.g. chimney inspections, speakers' bu eau, or courtesy dwelling inspections) would be an indicator of a department's sens tivity and responsiveness to community needs. Additional documentation for substantiating rating scores may include (but is not limited to): copies of trainine re`rds, attendance records, letters of confirmation from chief or training officer, newspaper or magazine articles, tes imonial letters from mayor, council person, town board member, citizens, etc., 1Z Please complete the attached information form for each nominatio .Nominations must be received no later than 11IARCH 15, 1989 in order for the selection committee to have sufficient time to review nominations and inter iew nominees. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have additional questions write Mr. William Quirk, 3105 42nd Ave. S., Minneapolis, MN 55- (612-724-0449). An Equal Opportunity EDUCATOR and EMPLOYER please call or 0 NOMINATION FORM 1989 MINNESOTA FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SERVICE A ARD NOMINEE Mendota Height ADDRESS 2121 Dodd Road Street Mendota Heights to City • State Business Telephone_(612 ) 454-3266 Home_(612 ) Nominated By: Mendota Heights City Council c/o Kevin Frazell, Ci Name Address 1101 Victoria Curve Street i 55120 Zip Code -5QA1 City State Zip Coe — Business Telephone_( 1;12 1,se-1R5n Home_(A19 )452 Reasons for Nomination: Please check all criteria on a rating of one to five, one being the lowest and five the highest. All ratings of three or more must be documented. l 1 2 1 3 I 4) 5 Attendance at Incidents Percentage of Dept. Members Attendance at Training Sessions Percentage of Dept. Members Training Program Contributions Fire Prevention/ Public Educatio Program Contributions Contribution to the Fire Service Local National Service to the Community Reasons for nomination. (attach additional documentation): Outstanding "volunteer service to the communit; area of fire prevention awareness. 0i. articular y in the Mail nomination to: MN Fire Department Community Service Award 3105 42nd Avenue So. Minneapolis, MN 55406 If you have any questions, please call Mr. William Quirk at 612-724-0449. ALL NOMINATIONS MUST BE RECEIVED BY MARCH 15, 1989. All nominations received by the above date will be acknowledged by postcard. X X X X x Reasons for nomination. (attach additional documentation): Outstanding "volunteer service to the communit; area of fire prevention awareness. 0i. articular y in the Mail nomination to: MN Fire Department Community Service Award 3105 42nd Avenue So. Minneapolis, MN 55406 If you have any questions, please call Mr. William Quirk at 612-724-0449. ALL NOMINATIONS MUST BE RECEIVED BY MARCH 15, 1989. All nominations received by the above date will be acknowledged by postcard. DOCUMENTATION OF NOMINATION The Mendota Heights Mayor and City Council are he nominating the Mendota Heights Volunteer Fire Departme the 1989 Minnesota Fire Department Community Service A This nomination is being made in recognition of outsta service to the community. In particular, the Mayor an Council believe that the Department should receive thi for the superior program of fire prevention awareness they are providing to the school children and other rel of Mendota Heights. Specific documentation of the Department's performance is outlined below. Attendance at Incidents The Department maintains an average turn out of 47% of members at incidents. The Council feels that this is particularly good response when interpreted in light o fact that a majority of the Department members are not available for weekday calls, due to the fact that they outside the City. Attendance at Training Sessions 87.5% of the Department members have received Firefigh- certification through the Dakota County VoTech system, most plan to advance through the Firefighter II prograi it becomes available in the County. 54% of the member; current certificates as First Responders, and 88% have attended training in hazardous materials awareness. Training Program Contributions All Department members parcipate actively in local and County -wide training programs. The Mendota Heights sti has been used as a training site for the Firefighter I program in Dakota County. Chief Mazcko currently servo Chair of the Dakota County Training Committee. Fire Prevention/Public Education As indicated above, the Mendota Heights Fire Departmen" being nominated for the community service award primar. the basis of its outstanding program of fire preventioi The program began several years ago, and has been consistently expanded. 1L for card. Zding I City a award ghat 3idents its the work :er I and i when have ition as is ly on ` The 1988 program, held during Fire Prevention week in included: - Three nights of open house at the Fire Station, with attendance by an estimated 1,250 citizens (out of a city population of 8,700). Activities included: - Demonstration of NFPA-approved home sprinkler systems with FEMA trailer - Demonstration on use of home f'ire extinguishers - Availability of certified service agency for servicing of home extinguishers - Films on fire safety - Tours of fire station and demonstration of firefighting equipment - In -class fire safety instruction for all kinderg rten and 4th grade students in community schools - "Lunch with a Firefighter" for all elementary stu ents, reaching about 900 young people - Beginning of "ADOPT A HYDRANT" program for neighb rhood snow removal around fire hydrants. The Department is also sponsoring an Open Gym Night at a local elementary school, whereby firefighters supervise gymnasium activities each Tuesday evening January through March. This increases exposure of young people to the Fire Department, and increases their awareness of fire safety issues. The firefighters not only donate all time for the fire prevention program, but funds for all fire prevention expenses are raised from private donations and proceed from the annual Fireman's Ball. In other fire prevention efforts, Mendota Heights has Edopted a fire prevention code, as well as Chapter 38 of the State Building Code, which requires sprinklering of all commercial structures. The Department has an active inspections program, and has pre -plan information on all commercial structures in the City. The success of these efforts is demonstrated by the fat that there has been a steady decline in residential and com ercial fires since these programs were instituted in 1984; an ,in fact, 1988 saw no commercial fires in the community. Contribution to the Fire Service Chief John Maczko served as president of the Dakota Co Chief's Association during 1988. Mendota Heights acti r participates in mutual aid drills and firefighting thr the County. The Chief, Assistant Chief, officers, and members participate actively in the International Assc of Fire Chiefs, State Fire Chief's Association, State schools, and so forth. Service to the Community Covered under Fire Prevention/Public Education. ughout iation r l CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 89 - RESOLUTION NOMINATING THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS VOL FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR THE 1989 MINNESOTA FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARD WHEREAS, the annual Minnesota State Fire School includ s. presentation of awards to an individual and a fire department which has consistently provided outstand'ng service to their community; and, WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Mayor and City Council fe 1 that the Mendota Heights Volunteer Fire Department does consistently provide such service to the community; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council believe that the M ndota Heights Volunteer Fire Department should particular y be recognized for its superior program of fire prevent on awareness. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Counc 1 of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota that Council nominates the Mendota Heights Volunteer Fire Department for the 1989 Minnesota Fire Department Community Service Award, and also directs that the attached nomination forms be forwarded on behalf of the Council. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 7th day of March, 1989. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEI HTS By Charles E. Merten Mayor 701 41. moi CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 1, 1989 TO: Mayor ann�d City Council FROM: Kevin Q a 1, City Administrator 11 SUBJECT: Recommendation for Appointment of Senior Secrotary INTRODUCTION As Council is aware, my secretary, Mary Ann DeLaRo left the City to take another position just prior to th of the year. City Clerk, Kathy Swanson and I have now completed the recruitment and selection process. The p of this memo is to recommend the appointment of Janet F to that position. DISCUSSION I nd rpose elsch The position was advertised in two Sunday editions of the Pioneer Press and Dispatch, as well as in some of the local newspapers. orae hundred twenty-six applications ere received! Fourteen applicants were invited in for testing. Of those, eight ultimately completed the typing and cleri al examinations. From the eight, we selected six for personal inte We ended up with three extremely strong candidates, an great deal of difficulty deciding between the three. However, we have now determined to recommend Janet Koe Janet has over six years of experience with 3M in positions of secretary, advanced secretary, and senior secretary. She holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in and Elementary Education from Northern State College i Aberdeen, South Dakota, and has recently received her Certified Professional Secretary designation. Janet a family currently reside in Afton, but are contemplatin a move to Mendota Heights. views. had a sch. the usic her SALARY Salary steps for the position of senior secretary re: $20,434 21,456 22,528 23,655 24,838 Because Janet holds credentials beyond the minimum required for this position, and because she was already making in excess of $23,000 when she left 3M two years ago (for maternity leave), I am recommending that she be appointed at the salary of $22,528, this is acceptable to her. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with the above recommendation, t should pass a motion appointing Janet Koelsch to the poition of Senoior Secretary at a beginning salary of $22,528, nd subject to a one year probationary period. KDF:kkb Mendota Heights Police Department DATE: March 3, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council City Administrator FROM: Police Chief SUBJECT: Police Officer and Investigator Appointments INTRODUCTION Council approved the Police Department assignment of a gatcnI Of Investigative duties, and the hiring of a new Police Officer, in 1909 budget' We are -'requesting to make the assignment and appoi effective April l, 1989 � icer to the tmeot DISCUSSION ' The Officer that will be assigned to investigation was noted and approved at a previous meetiog' we have now completed the tasks required to identify the best candidate for the Police Officer position. � Of the 55 applicants that we received fcommraS, we name down t who were interviewed by a board that consisted of acmioiutrativ Batchelder, Sergeant Anderson and Officers Olmstead, Reyes and The results of the oral interview produced a ranked list of can All a1z were qualified individuals that would fit well into our and Department' The top two candidates appear to be esncptioua We have begun the background investigation and have scheduled t psychological examination for the top candidate. (He was the u choice of our board). In compliance with the Data Privacy Law, 1 have made a contioge employment to David L. Olson Jr', and be has accepted. If all expected, Mr. Olson and I will be before Council on March 21st introductions and to seek final approvaI' z have attached a co David's resume for your iufozmatiou' RECOMMENDATION and ACTION REOUIRED We will recommend that Council approve the appointment of David Jr', as a probationary Police Officer, effective l,apriI, 1989, upon his auooeaafo1 completion of the background investigation E and psychological examinatiuno' six people aaaiotant otzasobke. dates. ommunity prospects. offer of ea as c formal of �. Olson ,notingent id physical DAVID L. OLSON JR_ 5146 7th Street Northeast Columbia Heights, Minnesota 55421 (612) 571-9147 EMPLOYMENT OBJECTIVE Entry Level Law Enforcement Officer EMPLOYMENT HISTORY 1988 to QQmmunity Service n ffinpr_ Co anvil j HeighPolirp Present: Der ->a slriQnt. Columbia Hjglttsy -Mi-aa-asota Investigate violations of ordinances regarding animals junk vehicles, and parked vehicles, and enforde same. Write police reports. Assist motorists with stalled or locked vehicles. Patrol city parks with mark d squad. Serve subpoenas to public. Transport prisoners and intoxicated persons. Testify in court. SpeaR to community groups about crime prevention. Perform residential security inspections and analysis. Patrol and inspect unoccupied residences. Direct traffic at special events and parades. Provide uniformec security in the evening at city -owned special events hall. Assist other C.S.O.'s in their duties. Maintain files. Perform other duties as directed by admi6istrative police personnel. 1987 to Du 0= Midical Eat -mend Technic- ia__ Me_d_H=4. Tnr- 1988: ManlewpQd jnneso_U Delivered liquid oxygen to residential and institutional customers. Operate and maintain company truck. Met requirements of driver certification for Minnesota D.O.T. Assisted others with invent ry control. Repaired liquid oxygen containers. On-call p rson for emergency delivery of equipment. 1984 to 1987: Home Medical. Tnc-. St- Louis Par innesota Delivered medical equipment to customers throighout the State of Minnesota. Made residential deliveries of liquid oxygen. Operated and maintained delivery truck. Provided input to administration regarding puichases of new equipment. Assisted in the training of new equip- ment technicians. Handled money and maintainEd records concerning equipment sales. Made schedules a delivery route reports. On-call driver for emergency eliveries. EDUCATION Hibbing Technical Institute, Certificate, 1988: Police SkiXIs Course North Hennepin Community College, A.A. Degree, 1988: Law Erforcement Program I C01UMbia licights Senior High School, Diploma, 1985: General( Courses I - az CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 1, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. ro 1, City Administrator SUBJECT: Planning'Commission Resignation Attached is a letter of resignation from planning commissioner Dorothy McMonigal. As you can see, Dorothy's resignation is effective March 1, so we have a current vacancy on the commission. Dorothy's term of office wil expire January 31, 1991. We have on file three applications for appointment to the commission from when we filled the vacancy last fall. Those applications are Bernard Friel, Robert Emery, and Walter Bonfe. Staff is not aware whether these three applicants are still interested in being considered. ACTION REQUIRED Council should receive the resignation of Dorothy McMonigal, and give staff whatever direction it wishes in recruiting candidates and/or making an appointment. KDF:kkb 1�✓�Cl"�i!/y} aE'L.t �-� t d Q -lam alp P-clee-41Y I'll- er— -L,e, �7�1 Z"ec� C-) (I ) 6 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 3, 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer SUBJECT: MASAC Representatives HISTORY• Every three years it is necessary for the City to appoi representatives to MASA.C. At the present time, Bernie Friel is the representative Larry Shaughnessy is the alternate. ACTION: The Council should either reappoint Friel -Shaughnessy o select new individuals for representatives. 4 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 1, TO: Mayor, City Council, City m n 4ator FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: C.J. Homes Contractor License INTRODUCTION I have been informed that Council members have rec, complaints over the workmanship and performance of C.J. as a general contractor. The Code Enforcement departme: confirmed that information. C.J. Homes was licensed as a General Contractor in and 1988. They'have not, however, applied for a 1989* license, and we have received insurance and bond cancel notices from the company's insurance carriers. This is perhaps an indication that C.J. Homes does not intend t apply (or would not qualify) for a 1989 license. >ived Homes it has 1987 tion Since the firm is not currently licensed, they may not do general contracting in Mendota Heights. We have therefore not researched the complaints. The contractor licensin3 ordinance states that "each applicant for a license shaLl satisfy the Council that he is competent by reason of education, special training, experience, and that he is equipped to perform the work for which a license is requested." If an application for license is received Eram C.J. Homes, we will recommend that Council invoke the cited ordinance provision. A license will not be issued withDut prior council approval. ACTION REQUIRED This is for information purposes only. No action s required at this time. r .t•• - 777"'N - � . . y e r ) --,•:. ` F . fi N..•r *•"'',1i,i 1 • 1 t--__ 111 f-- 0 44. j 7 • 1i 3 1 • NU 0 :z. 8 - 111�� -'� 1 1 l h �1 1 1