Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1989-05-02
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA MAY 2, 1989 1. Call to Order. 2 . Roll Call. 3. Agenda Adoption. %✓w �� 4. Approval of Minutes of April 4, 1989. — 14 5. Consent Calendar: —'4 a. Approval of City Hall Mechanical Contractors Payment b. Change Order - Val's Addition c.- Modified CAO Review d. Update of Review of Airport Corridor Informati received under FOIA Request — e. Acknowledgement of Draft Minutes of March 15 Parks and Recreation Commission f. Acknowledgement of Building Activity Report g. Approval of List of Contractors * h. Approval f List of Claims- -C laimsi n End of Consent Calendar 6. Introductions a. Ken Henderson, Chair of Northern _Dakota Co,ntW Communications Commission _ 7. Public Comments and Requests a. Mike Scharrer -/)Oak Wilt Disease Presentation 8. Publid Hearin s an Bid Awards a. Improvement No. 89, Project No. 2 - Executive 1 Bid Award lej 7, �K4) a ►le i.ve 9. Unfinished and New Business a. Case No. 89-17, Amendment and b. Cas No.•89-11, c.•C �6, d. ase N.o. 89-14, I.O.S. Planned Unit velopment Building Permit Bj or]tl.und WeWetlandsPermit �� Nides Variance Request _��� Posthumus Variance Request- p J. DELETION f. Case No. 89-13, Preliminary Plat, Alice Lane - Subdivision 1 ** f.1/ Impro�ejrft No"89, Project - Alice Lane �D Stree s an Utilities% 8q - g. Case No. 88-47, U.S. Essential Service Structure/Park Building Site Location, Building ermi A oval and a e Agreem h. Resi r ti on of Pf�frks� commission Chair aJ mes Stein g • � ! i. Chan7e of n!trt'ng Time for May 16th Meeting Date .00 10. Response to Council Comments a. Park Land Assessments 11. Council Comments a. Verbal report from Councilmember Blesener re: May 1st Meeting of Ballfields Subcommittee — 12. Adjourns q•I _�Q TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL KEVIN D. F / E�ITY ADMINISTRATOR Add -On Agenda for Meeting of May 2 May 2, 1989 Additional information is submitted for one consent cal item. Two new items, 5.i. and 9.f.1/2, are recommended addition, and item 9.e. is requested for deletion. 3. Agenda Adoption. It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda printed on blue paper. 5.i. Appointment of Representative to MASAC Sub - 180 -day Test Review The Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC requested that we designate a representative to the Operations Subcommittee reviewing the 180 -day test. Thi concerns the use of Runway 4 for departures to the north a portion of which swing back to the southeast over nort Mendota Heights. Our MASAC representative, Bernard Frie willing to serve. ACTION REQUIRED Motion to recommend Bernard Friel for appointment to the MASAC Operations Subcommittee for Review of the 180 -day Runway 4 Departure Test. 5.h. Approval of List of Claims Councilmember Jann Blesener has now requested to be incl in the registration for the League of Minnesota Cities I Conference. This brings the total for the check to the League,(temporary check number 59),to $706.00. r on has .ast, cern ., is ed j , w 9.e. Case No. 89-10, Hanson Subdivision Request - The petitioner has requested that this item be deleted fi this evening's agenda. f 1/2. Improvement No. 89, Project No. 3 - Alice Lane Streets and Utilities -- See attached memo from Public Works Director Jim Danielson. ti 3 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 2, 1989 TO: Mayor,,City Council t and Cim* st o FROM: James E. Danielson � t Public Works Director SUBJECT: Alice Lane Extension - Public Improvements Job No. 8911 Improvement No. 89, Project No. 3 DISCUSSION: Mr. Jack Blesener, developer of the Alice ' Lane Subdivision No. 1 plat and Mr. Vernon Eide owner of two previously platted lots located immediately north of Blesener's new lots have petitioned for public improvement to serve their development (see attached). Council should accept the petiticn and order a feasibility study. During feasibility preparation staff will ap- proach the immediate neighbors to determine if improvements should le ex- tended to serve them. The houses fronting Dodd Road, north of Wagor Wheel, presently do not have sanitary sewer and there is some vacant land north of the Eide lots that could be subdivided and developed. If the land (wners north do not want to develop now, a temporary cul-de-sac will be costructed on the Eide lots and then extended at such time as the land is subdivided. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council accept the petition and order bility report. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 89-_, RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR ALICE LANE SUBDI NO. 1 AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 3) f easi- 3hould ?ETITION IISION 6. Introductions a. Ken Henderson, Chair of Northern Dakota County Communications Commission 7. Public Comments and Requests a. Mike Scharrer - Oak Wilt Disease Presentation 8. Public Hearings and Bid Awards a. Improvement No. 89, Project No. 2 - Executive Dr Bid Award Lve L-1 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA MAY 211989 1. Call to order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Agenda Adoption. 4. Approval of Minutes of April 4, 1989. 5. Consent Calendar: a. Approval of City Hall Mechanical Contractors Payment b. Change Order - Val's Addition C. Modified CAO Review d. Update of Review of Airport Corridor Informatioa received under FOIA Request e. Acknowledgement of Draft Minutes of March 15 Parks and Recreation Commission f. Acknowledgement of Building Activity Report 9. Approval of List of Contractors i� h. Approval of List of Claims .End of Consent Calendar 6. Introductions a. Ken Henderson, Chair of Northern Dakota County Communications Commission 7. Public Comments and Requests a. Mike Scharrer - Oak Wilt Disease Presentation 8. Public Hearings and Bid Awards a. Improvement No. 89, Project No. 2 - Executive Dr Bid Award Lve L-1 9. Unfinished and New Business a. Case No. 89-17, I.O.S. Planned Unit Development Amendment and Building Permit b. Case No.. 89-11, Bjorklund Wetlands Permit C. Case No. 89-16, Nides Variance Request d. Case No. 89-14, Posthumus Variance Request --e-= Gorse—Ng ems �-O Hanson Subdivision Request —� f. Case No. 89-13, Preliminary Plat, Alice Lane - ( Subdivision 1 6� g. Case No. 88-47, U.S. West: Essential Service Structure/Park Building Site Location, Building Permit Approval, and Lease Agreement h. Resignation of Parks Commission Chair James Stein i. Change of Starting Time for May 16th Meeting Date 10. Response to Council Comments a. Park Land Assessments 11. Council Comments a. Verbal report from Councilmember Blesener re: May 1st Meeting of Ballfields Subcommittee 12. Adjourn Page No. 2511 April 4, 1989 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, April 4, 1989 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular me( City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:301 P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins, Hartmann and Witt. AGENDA ADOPTION Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 :ting of the o'clock Minnesota. 'clock P.M. Councilmember Hartmann moved ad ption of the revised agenda for the meet ng. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Witt moved approv 1 of the minutes of the March 21, 1989 m eting with corrections. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Hartmann moved ap roval of the consent calendar for the me ting along with authorization for executioa of any necessary documents contained t erein. a. Authorization for the purchase of two 1989 Chevrolet Caprice vehi les for use as marked squad cars, from rhane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet, In--. through the Ramsey County bid proces, for a purchase price of $12,687 p r vehicle. b. Adoption of Resolution No. 89-25, "RESOLUTION APPROVING LOT DIVISION OF PART OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2." (Katz -Frye subdivision, Case No. 89-04). c. Approval of a revised recydling budget for 1989. d. Authorization for staff to direct the appraisals of 1305 Kendon ane, 1310 Kendon Lane, 1294 Kendon L ne, 1305 Furlong Avenue, and 1314 Furlong Avenue as requested by the property owners. Page No. 2512 April 4, 1989 e. Acknowledgment of the code monthly report for March. f. Acknowledgment of the Progress Report. forcement ly Goals g. Approval of the list of con ractor licenses dated March 21st aid attached hereto. h. Approval of the issuance of Rubbish Hauler Licenses for April 1 t through December 31, 1989 to Triang a Rubbish and Roadway Rubbish. i. Approval of the List of Cla April 4, 1989 and totalling $187,425.84. Councilmember Witt seconded the Ayes: Nays: 0 PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Virgil McQuay, 976 Kay Ave what action the City has taken MAC to honor the City's flight request. Mayor Mertensotto re the Council has requested docu the MAC and FAA to substantiat patterns being used and asking Environmental Impact Statement done. He informed Mr. McQuay agencies are in the process of that data and will submit it t dated motion. ie, asked .o get the )attern >onded that ants from the flight ihy no ias been iat both :ollecting the City. Administrator Frazell stated t �a Rockenstein will be at the next meeting with a visual presenta i invited Mr. McQuay and any oth z residents to attend the meeting. Councilmember Blesener suggest d public notices be placed in the papers to inform the residents t aircraft corridor issue will b agenda. RECYCLING Administrative Assistant Kevin showed a locally produced a fi recycling in Mendota Heights w prepared by City staff and the Municipal Access Coordinator, He informed Council that he ha over 1600 recycling program si t Walter Council on. He interested that local hat the on the next Batchelder m about ich had been CATV andy Olson. received n -up cards, Page No. 2513 April 4, 1989 which represents program particpation by nearly 60% of the households in'the City. IVY FALLS CREEK Mayor Mertensotto informed the audience ADDITION BID AWARD that the award of bids for the 3vy Falls Creek Addition improvements had been tabled from the last meeting so that all property owners who would be affected by the project could be contacted. Public Works Director Danielsonstated that the bids are extremely favorabl and agreement has been worked out with the land owners, who.want the City to proceed with the project and the Brookside Lane extension and bridge construction. Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No. 89-30, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER, AND STREET CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE iVY fALLS CREEK ADDITION AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO 2)," awarding the bid to HRS Construction, Inc., for their low bid of $140,261.81). Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 VAL'S ADDITION Council acknowledged a tabulati n of bids BID AWARD received for the construction of public improvements to serve the Val's Addition. Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolution No. 89-31, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER AND STREET CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE V L'S ADDITION AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. 4)," awarding the bid to F.F. Jedlicki, Inc., for their low bid of $127,375.50. Councilmember Witt seconded thE motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CITY HALL BALLFIELD Council acknowledged a memo from Administrator Frazell regardinc upgrading of the City Hall ballfield. Councilmember Hartmann stated that when the City Hall was constructed,a re nest was made to do a number of the pro osed Page No. 2514 April 4, 1989 improvements and the action was inappropriate because the site park site. He stated that the retained to be used as a youth felt that the proposal is to ma into something that it is not, that he would like to see some planning report which indicates enough room to do what is propo Councilmember Witt agreed that Councilmember Hartmann's recoll the earlier discussion was corr when it was discussed Council r want a permanent structure. Sh that after studying the needs, the City needs every ballfield Mayor Mertensotto agreed with C, Hartmann, that the site is the site, not a designated park are stated that Council took very s time and pains and spent $1.5 m make the City Hall residential and that he feels open space ar Hall is much more appropriate. a ballfield is inappropriate fr planning standpoint, that the 1 the Civic Center site - not a p He agreed that the matter shoul referred to the Planning Consul stated that while everyone woul fact that fields are needed, bu is not the appropriate site. Councilmember Blesener stated t has very limited sites to choos that she feels it is totally ap locate a ballfield adjacent to Councilmember Witt stated that originally felt that the area s open space but recognizes the n fields. She felt it would be i to say fields are needed but no Hall. Mayor Mertensotto asked whether desired that the Special Park : the property from the General ] the site a permanent park. Cor Hartmann pointed out that the the field exists now is becaus, nothing on the site when the f, built. teemed not a ite was ield. He e the site nd stated ype of there is ed. ction of ct, that ally didn't stated he feels t can get. uncilmember ity Hall He gnificant llion to n nature, and City e felt that m a cation is rk area. be ant. He laud the that this at the City from and ropriate to ity Hall. he ould be ed for appropriate at City it is and purchase and and make ncilmember my reason there was eld was Ayes: 3 Nays: 2 Mertensotto Hartmann Page No. 2515 April 4, 1989 Councilmember Cummins stated th concurred with the decision of that it was premature to talk a a ballfield on the site, but th that the community needs a ball soon as possible. He stated th believes that it was the unanim consensus of the ballfield comm the City put afield into use a possible. He further stated th doesn't feel Council needs to d site to park use tonight but mu action on'field right away. He the site is very appropriate. t he year ago out putting t he feels ield as t he ttee that soon as t he dicate the t take felt that Councilmember Blesener moved to approve the ballfield layout as prepared byCity staff. Councilmember Cummins seconded he motion. Councilmember Blesener moved to approve purchase orders to five vendors for materials for construction of the ballfield improvements at a total cost of $17,828. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out t at the action exceeds the $15,000 stat tory limit for projects without going thro gh the formal bidding procedure. Councilmember Cummins withdrew is second to the motion. Councilmember Blesener withdre the motion. Councilmember Blesener moved that a purchase order for $12,124.00 he issued to Century Fence Company for a backstop and fencing. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Mayor Mertensotto asked whethei Council can do in five steps what is not a thorized to do in a single action. City Attorney Hart stated that he believes these ere actually five separate aspects, but that he would have to research the law. Councilmember Witt stated thatshe does the purchasing for the City of Eag n and that quotes are required for up to 15,000 purchases. She stated that th City has Page No. 2516 April 4, 1989 separate vendor quotes, each onl less than $15,000, so a bid is not necess ry. Mayor Mertensotto stated that Council has introduced a motion to underwrite a project, and the total amount of the award is $17,848'.' r Councilmember Cummins stated th t the statute says that cities cannot award a contract that exceeds $15,000. He pointed out that the motion is to award a single contract for $12,124, which is vithin the statutory guideline. Administrator Frazell pointed o t that there is no one vendor who woul bid on the total project and that the City is acting as its own general contractor. Vote on Motion: Ayes: 3 Nays: 2 Mertensotto Hartmann Councilmember Blesener moved th t a purchase order be issued to Cus om Turf in the amount of $3,500 for an irr gation system. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 2 Mertensotto Hartmann Councilmember Witt moved that a purchase order for concrete pads be issu d to Johnny Masonry for $986.00. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 2 Mertensotto Hartmann Councilmember Cummins moved that a purchase order be issued to Earl F. Anderson for $1,218.00 for players benches and a 42 seat bleacher. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 2 Mertensotto Hartmann HEARING: MENDOTA Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for HEIGHTS ROAD RIGHT -OF- the purpose of a public hearinc on an WAY VACATION application from United Properties for the vacation of a small portion of Mendota Heights Road right-of-way located at the Page No. 2517 April 4, 1989 northeast corner of the propo Heights Business Center 3rd a Mr. Dale Glowa, from United Pro present for the discussion. He that many years ago a small por property was mistakenly recorde property title as right-of-way company cannot get clear title property unless the small trian right-of-way is vacated. Mendota tion plat. erties, was explained ion of the on the nd his o its le of Mayor Mertensotto asked for quetions and comments from the audience. There being no questions or comments, Councilmember Hartmann moved that the hearing be closed at 8:24 P.M. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilmember Hartmann moved ad ption of Resolution No. 89-32, "RESOLUTI N APPROVING VACATION OF A STREET RIGHT -OF -W Y." Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 FINAL PLAT, MENDOTA Councilmember Witt moved adopti n of HEIGHTS BUSINESS Resolution No. 89-33, "RESOLUTI N APPROVING CENTER 3RD ADDITION FINAL PLAT FOR MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS CENTER 3RD ADDITION." Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilmember Hartmann moved tc authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign a quit claim deed transferring the City's interest in the vacated Mendota Heights Road right- of-way to Northland Company. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 FEASIBILITY REPORT, Council acknowledged and discussed the. MENDOTA HEIGHTS feasibility study for proposed public BUSINESS CENTER improvements to serve the Big Wheel Auto portion of the Mendota Heights Business Center, which is located north of future T.H. 13 and east of Pilot Knob (portion of the former MAC property). Mr. Dale Glowa stated that Unied Properties is not requesting r adways or Page No. 2518 April 4, 1989 storm sewer construction at this has petitioned for sanitary sews watermain extensions to the site that the report erroneously indi the developers are in favor of O but that he would like to retain flexibility of using either of t since there is time to work with before it is necessary to make a on which option to use. It was noted that the developer drain the site towards the High, right-of-way rather than petiti storm sewer at this time. Coun Blesener asked why it is not pr construct a storm sewer system to connect into the future Mn/D rather than using ditches. Public Works Director Danielson that the developer will be cons storm sewer system on the site T.H. 13 to connect into the Sta when it is constructed. He als that when Pilot Knob is improve have curb and gutter and storm Mr. Glowa indicated that his fi principal to future assessment Wheel site when T.H. 13 is cons that he cannot agree to a "blan since oversizing will be requir would like to work with the Cit to, come up with an appropriate figure. After discussion, Councilmember moved adoption of Resolution No "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER' ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPAR PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SA. SEWERS AND WATER TO SERVE MENDO' BUSINESS PARK (BIG WHEEL AUTO S IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. Councilmember Cummins seconded Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 EXECUTIVE DRIVE Council acknowledged final pl specifications for the constr Executive Drive. time, but and He noted sates that tion A, the ,e options, staff decision lans to y 13 ing for Imember osed to r the site system responded ructing a o drain to e system stated it will ewer. agrees in the Big ucted, but check" , and and State sessment Hartmann 89-34, REPORT, TION OF ITARY A HEIGHTS TE, 3).11 he motion. and ion of Page No. 2519 April 4, 1989 Councilmember Cummins moved adop Resolution No. 89-33, "RESOLUTIO FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS A AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BI IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE LOTS 3,4,5 BLOCK 4, AND LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK HEIGHTS INDUSTRIAL PARK (EXECUTI IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. Councilmember Blesener seconded Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 :ion of I APPROVING S FOR 6, AND 7, 5, MENDOTA E DRIVE, )." he motion. BEAVER TRAPPING Council acknowledged a memo fron the Public Works Director regarding beaver dams between T.H. 110 and Marie Avenue and south of T.H. 110 and.requesting auth rization for trapping.. Councilmember Cummins moved to ellow an exception to Ordinance No. 914 and authorize Kevin Custer to proceed to trap beavers at the locations cited in the Public Works Director's memo. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 COMMISSION APPOINTMENT Council acknowledged letters of application for appointment to the Planning Commission (Dorothy McMonigal unexpired to m) from Edyth Abrahamson, Dolores Heide re ch, Christine Koch, Daniel Tilsen, Tian Marshall and William Healey. It was Council consensus that t e Council should meet at 6:45 on the even ng of the Board of Review meeting, April lth, to hear short presentations from a ch of the candidates. Councilmember Cummins moved that when this evening's meeting is adjourned, it be adjourned to 6:45 P.M. on April 11th. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CITY HALL GUTTERS Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from the City Administrator regarding the installation of gutters on City) Hall. There was discussion over whet er there should be downspouts, and if s , whether the downspouts should be open r closed. Page No. 2520 April 4, 1989 Councilmember Hartmann moved to partial guttering system in the the building and gutters and sci across the Police garage area oz designed to accept continuation guttering system and downspouts future. Councilmember Blesener seconded Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 TEAMBUILDING Council briefly discussed the 1: objectives and outline.for the i teambuilding workshop. Councilmember Hartmann moved to special meeting for a teambuild with the Planning Commission an Recreation Commission to be hel Saturday,�April 15th at 9:00 A. Courtyard by Marriott Hotel. Councilmember Blesener seconded Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 approve a front of Lppers ily, to be of the in the the motion. t of ril 15th call for a ng workshop Parks and on at the the motion. RESCHEDULED MEETING Council acknowledged a memo from the City Administrator regarding the rescheduling of the July 4th meeting. Councilmember Hartmann moved that the meeting scheduled to be conducted on July 4th be rescheduled to Tuesday, July 11th. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PARKS Council acknowledged a brief u date from Administrator Frazell regardinc the proposed acquisition of Mendak to site as had been recommended by the Citizen's Parks Review Committee. Administrator Frazell stated that at the last meeting Council received the Committee's recommendation which included acquiring the 10+ acre site owned by the C.G. Rein Company on Dodd Road and appointed a committee of Counc'lmembers Blesener, Witt and himself to meet with the property owners to discuss the possibility of acquisition. He informed Cuncil that the committee met with the Rei representative, Ted Zinner las week and Page No. 2521 April 4, 1989 while Mr. Zinner expressed a des with the City, he stated that th is committed to building its apa complex, starting in May or June. Administrator Frazell stated tha first meeting, Mr. Zinner has in that the Rein Company has decide interested in selling the proper City and has decided not to spen significant money for appraising property. .re to work company since the icated it is not y to the the Councilmember Blesener stated that she believes Council has always sus ected that the owners would not be interested in selling to the City and that she is not surprised by the response. Mayor Mertensotto stated that the City cannot condemn the property unless it has an appraisal. He felt that the City would be looking at some very significant costs for condemnation plus probably 1,500 to $2,000 for an appraisal. Respoding to a question from Councilmember Ble ener over timing, Mayor Mertensotto expla ned the condemnation and Quick Take pro esses. Councilmember Cummins pointed o't that if the quick take process is used, the City would be committed to purchasing the property, and at whatever price is determined by the court. Councilmember Blesener stated always been her understanding condemnation was a process the take a look at, but that it so process cannot be used because acquisition price cannot be to the proposed referendum date. Administrator Frazell suggeste Council could refer the matter subcommittee to meet with the Attorney. Councilmember Blesener asked tt subcommittee be authorized to f appraisal on the property if it to be the best course of actiot meeting with the City Attorney. t it has t ty could s like the before that o the ty t the re an finds that after Page No. 2522 April 4, 1989 Councilmember Cummins asked whe can reasonably expect any infor the School District in a reason given the problems it is faced of the vandalism at Sibley High Administrator Frazell responded Superintendent of Schools has a that the district's property co' be taking up the issue this wee Councilmember Cummins felt that must have some idea on the scho site before proceeding with an the Mendakota site. Councilmember Blesener asked th matters be referred to the subc ballfield committee to consider alternatives and requested auth for appraisal of the Mendakota Councilmember Cummins stated th circumstances he is uncomfortab authorizing any expenditure unt has all necessary information b subcommittee. He stated that C should have information from th District in two weeks, and will recommendation back from the ba subcommittee as well, and that get an estimate of what an appr cost. Councilmember Hartmann s Council should also be given an long it would take to get an ap one is authorized. her Council ation from ble time, ith because School. that the sured him mittee will Council 1 district nnraisal of t the mmittee and rization ite. t under the e with 1 Council ck from the uncil School have a lfield staff should Isal would .ated that idea of how iraisal if SCHOOL DISTRICT Councilmember Witt stated that he would like Council to offer support and sympathy to the School District over the damage to Henry Sibley High School, and t3 offer to do whatever the City can to assist them. Councilmember Blesener moved to extend to School District 197 the City's assistance in any way it can possibly provide to respond to the situation at Sibley High. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PROCLAMATION Councilmember Hartmann moved thlat the week of April 23rd be proclaimed National Page No. 2523 April 4, 1989 Consumer Week. Councilmember Witt seconded the ion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MISCELLANEOUS Administrator Frazell informed C uncil of a request he had received from the Minnesota Territorial Pioneers asking for uggested locations for an Association heaquarters in the City. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Blesener informed ouncil that she will be late to the April 18th meeting. She also suggested that the Administrator send an information letter to the Furlong area residents. She expressed concern over questions and comments from Mr. Bernard Biesener during the consent calendar portion of the meeting (requests for appraisals from several Furlong area residents). ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmemb r Hartmann moved that the meeting be adjou ned to 6:45 P.M. on April 11th. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:28 o'clock P.M. Kathleen M. Swason City Clerk ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIJ ON APRIL 4, 1989 Concrete Licenses: Schock Construction Sement Construction, Inc. Excavating Licenses: Duane Ritter Excavating London Construction Company R. E. Palmen, Inc: Gas Piping License: Burnsville Heating & Air Conditioning General Contractor Licenses: Cedarcraft Construction/Design H & L Remodeling, Inc. Porch Living Reiling Construction Co., Inc. Walker Roofing Company, Inc. Wentworth Construction Heating & Air Conditioning License: Air Flow Systems, Inc. Plastering/Stucco License: Mel Koppen Plaster & Stucco RUBBISH HAULERS LICENSES FROM APRIL 1, 1989 TO DECEM 1989 Triangle Rubbish Roadway Rubbish 31, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEVIN LL, CITY ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: Approval of City Hall Mechanical Contractors Payment DATE: April 25, 1989 Attached is a letter from our architect and certificates payment from Doody Mechanical in the total amount of $10,576.73. After paying this bill, we will have retainai from the total Doody contract of $4,400.00. In Staff's opinion, this amount of money is sufficient to cover any deficiencies in the few mechanical items outstanding (i.e start up of the sprinkler system, air conditioners, etc.) ACTION REQUIRED Motion to approve mechanical contractor payments to Doody Mechanical in the total amount of $10,576.73. Attachment KDF:jak or Lindberg Pierce, Inc. Suite 1200 15 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612) 332-3339 10 March 1989 Gene Lange City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, DIN 55118 Architects James H. Lindberg Robert L. Pierce Re: City Hall Project Doody Mechanical Applications for Payment No. 11 Dear Mr. Lange: Please find enclosed Doody Mechanical's Applications fox Payment No. 11 and 12. We have reviewed this application and recommend payment amounts of $718.56 and $9,858.17, respectively. sincerely, 7 3 Paul A. Ragozz PAR.lkt CC. Doody Mechanical encls. 12 Ln the k r APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA DOCUMENT (702 PAGE ONE OF PAGES TO (Owner): CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 ATTENTION: PROJECT: New City Hall Building Lexington & State Rwy 110 Mendota Heights, MN CONTRACT FOR: Mechanical Construction APPLICATION NO: 112— PERIOD 2 PERIOD FROM: TO: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: Distribution to: Q OWNER ® ARCHITECT O CONTRACTOR D CONTRACT DATE: November 10, 1987 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached. CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous months by Owner #1 — #3 TOTAL ADDITIONS 810.00 DEDUCTIONS 1,091.62 Approved this Month Number Date Approved TOTALS 810.00 3,093.62 Net change by Change Orders 12,283.62 The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of his knowledge, .--^ information and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Docu- ments, that all amounts have been paid by him for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. CONTRACTOR: DOODY 1-27-89 In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site obser- vations and the data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that the Work has progressed to the point indicated; that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Docu- ments; and that the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. The present status of the account for this Contract is as follows: ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM ....................... $ 287, 447.00 Net change by Change Orders ..................... $_ (2,283.62) CONTRACT SUM TO DATE ........................ $ 285,163-38 TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE ........... $ 285,163.38 (Column G on G703) 400.00 RETAINAGE '�`' REQUF TING AT THIS TIME..". $ f-9rl3Er or total in Column I on G703 Z50 7G3,3c+ TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE .................. $� LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT ....... $ 270,905.21 CURRENT PAYMENT DUE ......................... $ 44rZ5&,4-�L State of: Minnesota Subscribed a!tt - Notary Pub My Commis (Attach explanation if ARCHITECT: By: of: Anoka anuary,19 89 - MINNESOTA ,,;,;; * * i* ;,;,,;,;s .. w from the amount applie for.) Date: This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. AIA DOCUMENT G702 • APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA6 • m 1978 —THE—AMERICAN—INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 6702-1978 CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DO(3lENT 6703 AIA Document 6702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below,amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Colwm I on Contracts where variable retainage for # 2878 -Mendota Heights City Hall Lindberg Pierce, Inc. Architects Page I OF 2 APPLICATION R: REQUEST APPLICATI DATE: FOR PER OD TO: RETAINAGE ARCHITECT'S P CT NO: A H C D E F 6 l ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHED(A.ED WORK COMPLETED MATERIALS TOTAL RETAINAGE NO VALUE FROM PREVIOUSTHIS PERIOD PRESENTLY COMPLETED % TO F NISH APPLICATION STORED AND STORED (6/C) (C } (D+E) (NOT IN TO DATE 5% D OR E) (D+E+F) 1. BOND 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 2,500.00 100.0% 2. 15010 -GENERAL PROVISIONS 2,361.00 2,361.00 0.00 0.00 21361.00 100.0% 3. 15160 -AIR/WTR TEST/BALANCE 1,250.00 1,250.00 0.00 0.00 1,250.00 100.0% 4. 15180 -MECH SYS INSULATION 12,940.00 12,940.00 0.00 0.00 12,940.00 100.0% 5. 15400 -PLUMBING, MATERIAL 24,000.00 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 24,000.00 100.0% 6. 1 IN , LABOR 20,000.00 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 100.0% 7. 15400 -OUTSIDE UTILITIES 15,334.00 15,334.00 0.00 0.00 15,334.00 100.0% 8. 15480 -LAWN IRRIGATION SYS 6,362.00 6,362.00 0.00 0.00 6,362.00 100.0% 9. 15500 -AUTOMAT SPRINK. SYS 26,700.00 26,700.00 0.00 0.00 26,700.00 100.0% 10. 15700 -LIQUID NEAT TRANSFER - MATERIA_ 28,000.00 28,000.00 0.00 0.00 28,000.00 100.0% 11. 15700 - - LABOR 14,000.00 14,000.00 0.00 0.00 14,000.00 100.0% 12. 15800 -AIR DISTRIBUTION - MATERIAL 93,000.00 93,000.00 0.00 0.00 93,000.00 100.0% 13. 15800 - ' - LABOR 19,000.00 19,000.00 0.00 0.00 19*000.00 100.0% 14. 15850 -AUTOMAT TEMP CONTROL 22,000.00 22,000.00 0.00 0.00 22,000.00 100.0% 15. C.O. i 1 - TO OFFSET ITEM 17 (2,850.00) (2,850.00) 0.00 0.00 (2,850.00)100.0% 16. C.O. # 2 810.00 810.00 0.00 0.00 810.00 100.0% 17. C.O. 4 3 (243.62) (243.62) 0.00 0.00 (243.62)100.0% 0.00 125.00 0.00 118.05 0.00 62.50 0.00 647.00 0.00 1,200.00 0.00 11000.00 0.00 766.70 0.00 318.10 0.00 1,335.00 0.00 1,400.00 0.00 700.00 0.00 -4,-656r69'✓aeG, oMa 0.00 -950r* G+m','v 0.00 -h400r00- 600.90 0.00 (142.50) 0.00 40.50 0.00 (12.18) TOTALS 285,163.38 285,163.38 0.00 0.00 285,163.38 100.0% 0.00 qI 2FI1? APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA DOCUMENT 0702 PAGE ONE OF PAGES TO (Owner): CITY OF MM. OTA HEIGHTS PROJECT: New City Hall Building APPLICATION NO: kk Distribution to: 750 South Plaza Drive Lexington & State Hwy 110 0 OWNER Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Mendota Heights, MN PERIOD FROM: M ARCHITECT TO: 0 CONTRACTOR 0 ATTENTION: CONTRACT FOR: Mechanical ARCHITECT'S 11 Construction PROJECT NO: CONTRACT DATE: November 10, 1987 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached. CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous months by Owner #1 — #2 TOTAL ADDITIONS 810.00 DEDUCTIONS 2,850.00 Approved this Month 1 243.62 Number Date Approved 3 12-13-88 1 TOTALS 810.00 (3,093.62) Net change by Change Orders (2,283.62) The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Docu- ments, that all amounts have been paid by him for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due, INC. . 1-27-89 S CERTIFI In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site obser- vations and the data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that the Work has progressed to the point indicated; that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Docu- ments; and that the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. The present status of the account for this Contract is as follows: ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM ....................... $ 287,447.00 Net change by Change Orders ..................... $_(2,283.62) CONTRACT SUM TO DATE ........................ $ 285,163-38 TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE ........... $ 285,163-38 (Column G on 6703) RETAINAGE 5 % ......................... $ 14,258-.17 or total in Column I on G703 TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE ..................$ 270,905.21 LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT ....... $. 270,186.65 CURRENT PAYMENT DUE ......................... $ 718.56 State of: Minnesota 2t County of: Anoka Subscribed and sworn to before me this- NaY_2!January, 19 89 Notary PubliF P P I P P ------- My CommisX rs� : ...... rMNIM (Attach explan ARCHITECT: applied for.) RM By: Date: This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. AIA DOCUMENT G702 * APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT - APRIL 1978 EDITION 0 AIA* 1 0 1978 I nr-r%mrri%;.AN-INSTITUTE�OF�ARCHITEC-TSi�1735-�-.NEW—XQR-K=&VkNULE,_tI.W.,_WASHINIO�ION,_RC..20.006,,,,, 6702-1978 CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMENT 6703 AIA Document 6702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below,anounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I an Contracts where variable retainage for # 2878 -Mendota Heights City Hall Lindberg Pierce, Inc. Architects Page 21 OF 2 APPLICATION R: It APPLICATION MATE. 1-24-89 PERI TO: ' 1-31-89 ARCHITECT'S PROJE T NO: A B C D E F 6 I ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED WORK COMPLETED MATERIALS TOTAL RETAINAGE NO VALUE FROM PREVIOUISTHIS PERIOD PRESENTLY COMPLETED % TTFNISH APPLICATION STORED AND STORED (6/C) (D+E) (NOT IN TO DATE 5% D OR E) (D+E+F) 1. BONG 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 2. 15010 -GENERAL PROVISIONS 21361.00 2,361.00 0.00 3. 15160 -AIR/{ITR TEST/BALANCE 1,250.00 1,250.00 0.00 4. 15180 -MECH SYS INSLUTION 12,940.00 12,940.00 0.00 5. 15400 -PLUMBING, MATERIAL 24,000.00 24,000.00 0.00 6. " a , LABOR 20,000.00 20,000.00 0.00 7. 15400 -OUTSIDE UTILITIES 15,334.00 15,334.00 0.00 S. 15480 -LAWN IRRIGATION SYS 6,362.00 6,362.00 0.00 9. 15500 -AUTOMAT SPRINK. SYS 26,700.00 26,700.00 0.00 10. 15700-LIQUIID NEAT TRANSFER - MATERIAL 28,000.00 28,000.00 0.00 11. 15700 - - LABOR 14,000.00 14,000.00 0.00 12. 15800 -AIR DISTRIBUTION - MATERIAL 93, 000.00 93, 000.00 0.00 13. 15804 - " - LABOR 19,000.00 18,500.00 500.00 14. 15850 -AUTOMAT TEMP CONTROL 22,000.00 21,500.00 500.00 15. C.O. # 1 - TO OFFSET ITEM #7 (2,850.00) (2,850.00) 0.00 16. C.O. # 2 810.00 810.00 0.00 17. C.O. # 3 (243.62) 0.00 (243.62) 0.00 2,500.00 100.0% 0.00 2,361.00 100.0% 0.00 1,250.00 100.0% 0.00 12,940.00 100.0% 0.00 24,000.00 100.0% 0.00 20, 000.00 100.0% 0.00 15,334.00 100.0% 0.00 6,362.00 100.0% 0.00 26,700.00 100.0% 0.00 28,000.00 100.0% 0.00 14,000.00 100.0% 0.00 93, 000.00 100.0% 0.00 19,000.00 100.0% 0.00 22,000.00 100.0% 0.00 (2,850.00)100.0% 0.00 810.00 100.0% 0.00 (243.62)100.0% TOTALS 2859163.38 284,407.00 756.38 0.00 285,163.38 100.0% 0.00 - 125.00 0.00 118.05 0.00 62.50 0.00 647.00 0.00 1,200.00 0.00 11000.00 0.00 766.70 0.00 318.10 0.00 1,335.00 0.00 1,400.00 0.00 700.00 0.00 4,650.00 0.00 950.00 0.00 11100.00 0.00 (142.50) 0.00 40.50 0.00 (12.18) 1 0.00 14,258.17 ✓ CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and Cit M?5 or FROM: Klayton H. Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Change Order No. 1 Val's Addition Job No. 8815 Improvement No. 88, Project No. 4 T-Tlnn TnM _ April 28, 11989 Work has started on the Val's Addition project and there are 3ome larger trees that the developer wishes to save by moving them to a other location. Staff negotiated a price with the contractor that is ac eptable to the developer and prepared the attached change order. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council approve the attached change or increasing the contract amount by $4,140.00 which will be assesse the project. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with the staff recommendation they should motion approving Change Order No. 1. against s a CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 April 26, 1989 ORDER FOR A CHANGE IN CONTRACT TO: F.F. Jedlicki, Inc. 14203 West 62nd Street Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55346 SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 Sewers, Water, Streets Valls Addition Job No. 8815 Improvement No. 88, Project No. 4 Gentlemen: The following work, deviating from the basic contract for th project, shall become part of that contract and shall comply with ings and specifications for the project. above ie draw - 1. 18 Each Transplant 5" - 8" Tree. @ $230-00 $4,1p.00 The above changes anticipate an addition to the Contract Amo t the amount of $4,140-00. T FOR THE CONTRACTOR: Accepted: (Date) F.F. JEDLICKI, INC. By uthorized Sig&Xure & Title )Z, 1. h E. Danielson ie Works Director FOR THE CITY OF MENDOTA HSIGHTS B (Mayor) 0 Clerk (Date) CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 26, 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council, City Asn ator FROM: Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcemen Or SUBJECT: 1199 Culligan Lane Modified CAO CAO Review DISCUSSION Choice Wood Co. has made an application for a build.- permit uild:permit to build an addition to the existing structure at Culligan Lane. 1199 Culligan Lane is within the boundar: of Ordinance 403 the Critical Area Overlay District. Sti has made a site visit and also checked city topography information and finds that the above mentioned property c not have a 40% slope. As a matter of fact this particul< lot is relatively flat. Ordinance 403 Section 2.3C modification states the following: In the case of a minor development and/or ch; involving a single family dwelling, and if the site plan conforms to the standards of the CAO District Ordinance, City Administrator shall bring the request to the City Council at its next regular meeting following receipt of application for CAO consideration. The City Council sha: review such request and may if it so determines, exempt applicant from complying with any inappropriate requiremi of this Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Staff would recommend that City Council approve the building permit for the proposed addition under Section ; modification. Staff would also recommend that City Couni waive the $100.00 application fee. Staff has not expends any additional research time other than the normal reviei process. ACTION REQUIRED If City Council wishes to implement Staffs recom- mendation to 1. Approve the CAO Modified Section for a S1 and 2. Waive the $100.00 application fee, it should pass motion of approval. 199 f nge the an 1 he �nts .3C it la CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: MAYOR ANDf CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEVIN 1) CITY ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: Update on Review of Airport Corridor Information received under FOIA Request DATE: April 28, 1989 The City recently filed formal request with the Federal Aviation Administration and the Metropolitan Airports Commission for information relevant to the delineation of flight corridor along the border of Eagan and Mendota Heights. We have now received a response from both agenc S. The response from the Metropolitan Airports Commission consists of minutes from MASAC meetings, correspondence between airport officials with the cities of Eagan and Mendota Heights, resolutions from the two cities, etc. Approximately half of the material pertains to the actions in the early 1970's that.led up to the creation of a supposed southern boundary in Eagan. Most of the second half of th materials concern actions that the two cities have been involved with since 1984, and which would be familiar to Council members. Although Staff has not done an exhaustiv review of the 600+ pages, it does not appear that there is too much new in the material that we were not already awar of. The information from the Federal Aviation Administration consists of three operational tower orders. The material is highly technical, and frankly beyond the ability of City Staff to interpret. All of the material is also of very recent vintage, late 1988 and 1989. Our FOIA request was for all relevant materials going back to 1970. We have written a follow up letter to the FAA office in Des Plaines, Illinois inquiring whether in fact these recent tower orders are the only relevant information,'and if so, asking that.they certify that to us in a letter. As anyone who has been through these discussions is well aware, FAA rules, regulations and procedures are technical, enigmatic, and difficult for an "outsider" to interpret o make any sense of. Staff feels that we will need the assistance of a knowledgeable person to interpret this data in light of regulations concerning required environmental impact statements for changes of procedures. Larry Shaughnessy is currently working on coming up with someone whose services we might retain for this analysis. A name been suggested to us, but at this point in time, we have n been able to speak directly with that person. When we hav found someone that we believe would be appropriate to the task, Staff will make a recommendation to the Council for retaining his/her services. ACTION REQUIRE The purpose of this memo is informational only, and no further Council action is required this evening. KDF: j ak s CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES, MARCH 15, 1989 The Parks and Recreation Commission meeting begi P.M. on Wednesday March 15, 1989 in the Conference Ro Hall. The blizzard on. Tuesday evening forced the mee held on Wednesday. The following members were present: Damber, Leffert, Owens and Stein. Also present: Councilmember City Administrator Frazell and Administrative Batchelder. Guests present were: Ken Dallman of U.S Norm Gellerman. MINUTES The minutes of the February meeting wer after changes were made to indicate additional funding was needed for this ball program because costs for T -ball c, down. U.S. WEST City Administrator Frazell gave a report on the application process of th plan to provide fiber optics to the area. Frazell explained the sitii building on park land with a storage ar rooms for park activities. He state City Council has granted a Conditional and has referred the request to Commission to determine which alternati Ken Dallman, of U.S. West, outlined optics to the home test project that wishes to install in the Kensington explained how their portion of the prop by 32 ft. building would be used. I explained the three alternatives of buildings. The commission and M: discussed the parking, maintenance, li use of the facility. Mr. Dallman state West would only need to get one smz truck into the site at a time and the parking would be minor. He stated tha would maintain the roof and the maintain the exterior of the building, be no sign or burglar alarms, and that danger from the electronic technology. at 7:05 at City a to be I Huber, Blesener, Assistant West and approved that no years T- i be kept background U.S. West Kensington j of the a and rest that the Use Permit the Parks e is best. the fiber U.S. West area. He sed 18 ft. Dallman dting and Dallman bility and that U.S. .1 service impact on U.S. West ity would here would here is no Councilmember Blesener described th'Citizens Parks Review Committee's work on this park site. She recommended to accept a st?tage room, bathrooms, and an overhang with a wildow cut in the side and that the facility be located to maximize the parking lot with provisi least sixty (60) spaces and that the p; have a drive thrbugh capability. She s was the Ballfields sub -committee's prefe Commissioner Leffert stated he had coni once again the Parks Commission ri proposal or issue so late in the pr( their input was minimized and that decision was necessary on a critical iss Mr. Dallman explained -the process his pr gone through and what the city optio easements and buildings. Commissioner Owens made a motion to a U.S. West with option one for the east with a 3 foot overhanging roof, enablin, dtive through parking lot The motion to planning staff and City Counci.' Commissioner leffert seconded and the i approved 5-0. ICE ARENA Norm Gellerman appeared on his and Joh account to present a preliminary proposa an ice arena and indoor soccer facil arena would have two indoor ice sheet indoor soccer fields for use by the Indoor Soccer League. The ice sheets used by local high schools, Mend -Eagan with verbal commitments to 3,,000 hours c would be a 4,000 seat arena with weight concession facilities. One ice sheet we smaller arena. Year round use for meeting and storage. A 21 - acre facili privately owned and would operate on service basis. The commission queried Mr. Geller parking, users, revenue projections, , impact statements. The Commission thanks for sharing the idea and stated exciting idea and that they wished posted. CIVIC CENTER City Administrator Frazell explained SOFTBALL projections and that the field's primar be for youth baseball. He explained items in the proposal and stated tl simple to bring this project in under allotted by the Commission. n for at rking lot ated this ence. rns that eived a ass that a quick gal has are on commodate end site a 60 car s subject review. )tion was Schwab's 1 to build ity. The s and two Minnesota would be and others f use. It rooms and uld have a training, ty that is a fee for nan -about nd traffic expressed his was an o be kept the cost use would .he deduct t it was ie $40,000 Commissioner Leffert made a motion to 4pprove the design with a $40,000 limit and the c�ordination of deduct items with Chuck Mastel of M, Special thanks were extended to Chuck t Bill Owens for their work and effort: Damberg seconded and the motion was appri tnd-Eagan. astel and Carol )ved 5-0. IVY FALLS City Administrator Frazell explained how the BRIDGE neighbors, in a public hearing, had s ggested a foot bridge to connect the school with the surrounding neighborhoods. Commissioner Damberg questioned the $4d 000 price tag. Chairman Stein suggested that t is bridge went beyond a parks issue and should b included with a roads and bridge budget. Frazell stated the idea of the bridge had the endorsement of the trails sub -committee but not necessarily the price tag. It is part of a stub of the trails system and does provide good ccess for the area. Chairman Stein stated that the need for he bridge was a valid public safety issue and that this was in essence a sidewalk. Therefore, he felt it was a city issue and nota valid parks exenditure. Councilmember Blesener stated that the ridge was a good link to access schools as partf a trail system, however, the $40,000 price is to high. Commissioner Leffert made a motion to eject the bid for a $40,000 bridge at Ivy Falls and to informally ask the engineering staff to develop a cheaper plan. Commissioner Huber seconded and the motion was approved 5-0. OTHER BUSINESS The work on the referendum by the Citi Review Committee was reviewed and discussion of the referendum process. Board will meet the 20th of April to 1 package the Council will consider on tl April. Councilmember Blesener presented the Parks Review Committee request for endoi the Parks and Recreation Commission for put forward on the referendum. She pr( outline of the Ballfields recommendat possible Mendakota acquisition, and t proposal to the School District. Col Huber presented the Trails recommenda Commissioner Damberg presented the Existing Neighborhood Parks recommendati ens Parks .here was The Parks ok at the e 21st of Citizens -sement by the plans !sented an ions, the fte Sibley nmissioner tions and New and ins. Chairman Stein stated that he was impres! effort of the referendum committee and should be commended. He stated this wa: way to build consensus and it was obv they have incorporated all the necessary He expressed a desire to see a resolutic a public statement strongly endorsing thi as it reflects the community's input comprehensive process. He congratu: committee for their work and the City C4 providing the process. He recommended a this effect that strongly recommend! approval. sed by the that they the best ious that elements. �n that is proposal through a ated the uncil for motion to Council Commissioner Leffert made a motion to move the Citizens Parks Review Committee's proposal to Council with a strong endorsement of approval, by resolution. Commissioner Owens secondei and the motion was approved 5-0. ADJOURN There being no further business the adjourned at 9:30 P.M. Kevin Batchelde Administrative ting was sistant Mayor, City Council, and Cii rator FROM: -Paul. R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Building Activity Report for April, 1989 CURRENT MONTH BUILDING 40 $2,917,661.00 $23,669.80 TRADE PERMITS: No. Valuation Fee Collected SFD 10 1,526,252.00 13,612.52 Apt 0 0 0 Townhouse 0 0 0 Condo 0 0 0 Misc. 26 147,729.00 3,025.70 C/I 4 1,243,680.00 7,031.58 Sub Total 40 $2,917,661.00 $23,669.80 TRADE 288 7,200.00 PERMITS: 284 7,100.00 ',robing 10 352.00 cer 12 60.00 Sewer 12 210.00 Heat, AC, Sub Total 46 4,724.50 Licensing: Contractor's MEMO Date: April 26, 1989 89 - YEAR TO DATE o. Valuation Fee Collected 16 2,469,670.00 21,935.97 0 0 0 5 821,235.00 7,041.21 7 1,500,000.00 7,490.18 34 212,315.00 4,457.60 11 1,432,123.00 9,575.07 73 $6,435,343.00 $50,500.03 88 - YEAR TO DATE o. Valuation I Fee Collected 32 4,732,994.97 42,593.50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 2,878,235.00 16,631.58 37 323,738.111 5,101.98 88 $7,934,968.081 564,327.06 32 943.00 49 23 115.00 38 17 297.50 1 23 37 5,625.50 59 109 6,981.00 1169 1,177.00 190.00 402.50 7,178.50 8,948.00 Licenses 32 800.00 288 7,200.00 284 7,100.00 Total 118 $2,917,661.00 $29,194.30 470 $6,435,343.00 $64,681.03 541 $7,934,968.08 $80,375.06 NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Nac, and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan the k fee, and valuation amounts. LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON MAY 2, 1989 Asphalt License: Asphalt Specialties Co., Inc. Concrete Licenses: Creative Concrete M & N Construction Specialists R K & T Construction Excavating Licenses: E & H Earth Movers, Inc. Industrial Utilities, Inc. Kuehn Excavating Rose Sewer Westonka Sewer & Water Gas Piping Licenses: Red Wing Heating & Air Conditionings Inc. Rollins Heating & Air Conditioning General Contractor Licenses: B & B Construction of Champlin Benard L. Dalsin Co. Brinka Drywall, Inc. Choice Wood Company Eagan Pool & Spa Everlasting Homes, Inc. Fence Specialists Glendale Contracting, Inc. Gurtek Construction, Inc. Hogan Home Builders J.P. Homes, Inc. Jacks Construction & Masonry, Inc. McCallum Construction, Inc. Michael Curtice Construction M. J. Moser Construction Partners 4 Design, Inc. Superior Construction Valley Pools Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses: Harris Waldinger, Inc. O'Keefe Mechanical, Inc. Paragon Heating & Air Conditioning Rollins Heating & Air Conditioning SH HAULERS LICENSE: Metro Rufuse, Inc. 2 Ace Hdwe 06-4335-000-00 shovel 5.77 Ace Hdwe 08 +335=03i�0�D mise splys 164.89 -- - 4 170.66 �_- iotais temp tnecK rvumoer Temp Check Number 3 3 AT&T 3 AT&T '5—AT&T 3 AT&T 3 AT&T 18 totals temp unecK rvumoer Temp Check Number 4 4 ..._ -.,... _ 01-4210-050-50 01-4210-070-70 — Ma 2 1989 May 15-Engr 60-Utilties 27 Apr 1 Claims List 10.52 _ 20 -Police 70 -Parks Page 1 Thu' 1 1 City of Mendota F ts�jn 9 ,,✓✓ 111 30 -Fire 80 -Planning (( 40 -CEO 85 -Recycling Temp Check Number 1 9oz-Animal-Control Temp. Check- -Number Vendor Namegccoun Code Comments Amount 1 A T & T 01-4210-110-10 Ld calls, - 1'A T & T 01-4210-@40-40 Ld calls 1.08 1 A T & T 01-4210-030-30 Ld calls 2.04 -" 3 9.18 Totals Temp Check Number 1 2 Ace Hdwe 06-4335-000-00 shovel 5.77 Ace Hdwe 08 +335=03i�0�D mise splys 164.89 -- - 4 170.66 �_- iotais temp tnecK rvumoer Temp Check Number 3 3 AT&T 3 AT&T '5—AT&T 3 AT&T 3 AT&T 18 totals temp unecK rvumoer Temp Check Number 4 4 ..._ -.,... _ 01-4210-050-50 01-4210-070-70 -w Hcro or minnesova -H'Y- 12 C1/. /B -- -ToasT� Temp Check Number 5 `J- 1 5 American National Bank 08-4200-000-00 - Lease pymt 86=558_75 86-,558-.--75— Totals 6;558:7 Totals Temp Check Number 5 Tlemp C ec um er 6 Anti Vehicle Crime Assn 01-4404-020-20 mbrshp dues 15.00 --- 6 15.0@ Totals Temp Check Number 6 _ Temp Check Number 7 — Mar svc 5.9 Mar svc 10.53 Mar svc 10.52 _ ar svc 10:53- -35.s� -w Hcro or minnesova -H'Y- 12 C1/. /B -- -ToasT� Temp Check Number 5 `J- 1 5 American National Bank 08-4200-000-00 - Lease pymt 86=558_75 86-,558-.--75— Totals 6;558:7 Totals Temp Check Number 5 Tlemp C ec um er 6 Anti Vehicle Crime Assn 01-4404-020-20 mbrshp dues 15.00 --- 6 15.0@ Totals Temp Check Number 6 _ Temp Check Number 7 27 Apr 1' , Claims List Page 2 Thu' 1:t I City of Mendota f its Temp Check Number 7 ' Temp. Check _ Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount 7 711 14_.9G 03 —Totals Temp CFiec '- umber Temp Check Number 8 8 Artsign Matls 10-4490-000-00 splys Park ref 77.66 g 77.66 Totals Temp Check Number 8 Temp Check Number 9 Associated Bag Co 01-4620-020-20 bag sealer/tubing 458.88 9 458.68 Totals Temp Check Number 9 Temp Check Number 10 C Temp Check Number it 11 Banyon Data Systems 01-4220-133-10 Apr cons 2,258.00 11 Banyon Data Systems 14-4220-000-00 assort program 500.00 _ 11 Banyon Data 5ystems 05-4220-133-15 pr cons 42'7:00 33 3,185.00 o£�a]eTemp Check—Number 11 ~~ emp-Shec,k-Nu,mbe 12 12 Kevin Batchelder 01-4400-110-10 Apr mtg 10.00 12 1 W. iav� Totals Temp Check Number 12 emp Check Number - 1:r uiffs IT- - 2�+n-6iL -enE 3»'.H?' ___w_ 7 Apr 1989 - Claims List Page 3 'hu 1:50 PM City of Mendota Heights 'emp Check Number 13 Temp. Check lumber -Gen or Name Account Code Comments Amount 13 0 — Totals Temp C eck Number 13 'emp Check Number 14 14 Board of Water Commissioners 08-4425-000-00 Mir svc 25.21 14 Board of Water Commissioners 01-4425-315-30 Mar svc 82.76 — f" Boar —of Water Commissioners 0 f-- ►�►25=3-re=70Mar svc .I-07 14 Board of Water Commissioners 48-4460-853-00 svc conn 87-6 1,782.00 j 14 Board of Water Commissioners 53-4460-857-00 svc conn 88-1 715.00 "S4—Boa�"fTJater Commissioners :54-4460--8758--00 Svc conn 9- 7, 45.-50 14 Board of Water Commissioners 53-4460-857-00 air vent 88-1 345.21 14 Board of Water Commissioners 08-4425-000-00 Hydr use C H 292.10 112 10, 300.85 Totals Temo Check Number 14 "emp Check Number 15 15 =f 15 'emp Check Number 16 16 B S N Corp Totals Temp Check Number 01-4305-070-70 16 Tennis nets 429.00 remm p C ec Number 17 17 Budget Dental Sply 01-4305-020-20 mise splys 17.25 17 17.25 Totals Temp Check Number 17 Temp Check Number 18 a ng 68 -ad-, 18 _ 84.60 -' TotaTs'remp Check -(umber i Temp Check Number 19 19 Cherokee State Bank 01-4490-110-10 Totals Temp Check Number 19 safety deposit bx 15.00 27 Apr I Claims List Page 4 Thu 1:5, 14 City of Mendota H sts Temp Check Number 20 Temp. Check Number Veii-d-or —Name Account Code Comments Amount Tc =10 21 Colt Carpet Cleaners 06-4335-000-00 carpet clng 202.00 21 202.00 Totals Temp Check Number pi I Temp Check Number 22 22 Communications Center 01-4330-440-20 radio rprs 42.00 22 Communications Center 01-4330-450-30 radio rprs 399.75 66 q W. 75 Totals Temp Check Number 22 Temp Check Number 23 2z— -- 23 23 Totals Temp ChecW--NGffi6FF- Temp Check Number 24 24 Corrigan Electric 01-4330-490-50 rprs 121.72 24 Corrigan Electric 15-4330-490-60 rprs L S- 311.90 48 433.62 Totals Temp Check Number 24 Temp Check Number 25 Illt -85-0—rawf—ord Door rpr doors 61.80 25 61.80 r—Tota I-.7Temp Check Number 25 Temp Check Number 26 26 Custom Fire Apparatus 01-4330-460-30 rprs 2286-2287 133.60 26 133.60 Totals Temp Check Number 25 27 Apr I Claims List Thu 1:5, 1 City of Mendota H, its Check Number 27 Page 5 Temp. Check -Nab—er Vendor game Account Code Comments Amount 27 Dahlgren Shardlow Uban 01-4221-135-80 Mar retainer 1,242.00 27 1,242.00 Totals Temp Check Number 27 Temp Check Number PS 28 -"Totals 'T&-Fn-p-Ch-e-cW-Um ber 8 Temp Check Number 29 29 Dakota County F C Assn 01-4404-030-30 Totals Temp Check Number 29 30 Dakota County Hwy Dept 01-4211-4e0-50 1989 dues City Sh tfc signals 30.00 256.07 30 256.07 Totals Temp Check Number 30 Temp Check Number 31 31 Temp Check Number 32 32 Dennis Delmont 01-4415-020-20 May allow 120.00 6d 120-.00— Totals Temp Check Number 32 `Temp CE -e -c W- N U -m 15 e r -733 Totals Temo Check Number 33 Temp Check Number 34 27 epr 1 Thu 1:5 Temp Check Number 34 Claims List City of Mendota HL is Page 6 Temp. Check —fidWGir Vendor Name Account Code Comments A-rWO-unt ---re- Check Number Mp 92 35 Fischers GAs 01-4330-440-20 headlamp 2243 17.00 35 17.00 Totals Temp Check Number 35 Temp Check Number 36 36 Fisher Scientific 01-4620-020-20 cabinet 1,601.85 36 I i otals Temo Check Number 26 Temp Check Number 37 37 Fisher Photo Supply 01-4305-020-20 splys 25.18 74 Totals Temp Check Number 37 Temp Check Number 38 8 Kevin Frazell 01-4415-110-10 May allow 175.00 Totals Temp Check Number 38 39 Friden Alcatel 01-4300-110-10 postage meter tape 14.40 3 9 -FFYd -&-r-I AI`EAtel 0T--4300--020--20 postage metertape1,4:-.-40-- ...postape meter tape 14.40 39 Friden Alcatel 01-4300-040-40 postage meter tape 14.40 397FFI-d—en Alcatel f---430"- A - 0 pos age meter tape 1-4740— 39 Friden Alcatel 05-4300-105-15 postage meter tape 14.57 Totals Temp Check Number 39 Temp C ec Number 4 27 Apr 3 Claims Lis Page 7 Thu I:-- PM City of Mendota Heights Temp Check Number 40 Temp. Check N u- 6 Account Code Comments Amount M ii-r--Qe--n-d—orR—ajnEi7 Accou 40 Totals -re—mp Check Number 40 Temp Check Number 41 41 Goodyear Service Store 01-4330-440-20 rprs 2246 9.75 SP Z+b 46 1 0 S 01-4330-440-20 46 01-2072 47 1 C M A R C R C Temp T T ti Apr mtcn 4/21 & 5/5 payroll ,0-219- 5/5 P -Yr -11 215.40 T Temp C h—e-c—k—Number _50 mileage Fire : 80 01- 4 -030-30 2653 $6 James ilWurg 01-4400-030-30 expenses Fire schl ----- r. 50 James Kilburg 50 Te-m-pT-CheCk NUMPuT' -I— 0 Apr Svc 962. . 0 0 51 Paul Kaiser 1-4268-150-30 962.00 51 51 Totals Temp Cheek Number Temp Check Number 52 59.85 mtcn Splys te8-4335-000-00 52 Knox Lumber ........... 27 Apr I Claims List Thu I:t I City of Mendota H, its -Temp Check Number 54 Page 9 Temp. Check NFG,m- Comments JeMp CheCR Numot-r-Amount 53 Knutson Rubbish Service 08-4335-000-00 Apr svc 24.62 53 24.62 Totals Temp Check Number 53 Temp Check Number 54 eage 54 Thomas Knuth 58-4415-863-00 project mileage 40.32 5W -Thomas Knuth 68-4415-665- 6 project mileage 1.20 54 Thomas Knuth 05-4415-105-15 May allow & misc mileage 22.48 Totals Temp Check Number Te-M—pCF-e-ck 54 55 Kremer Spring & Align 01-4330-490-50 rprs 209 360.79 55 360.79 Totals Temp Check Number 55 Temp Check Number 56 56 Temp Check Number - 57 57 L M C I T HP 57 L M C I T HP 01-2074-- * 01-4131-020-20 ues 175.50 May prem 339.01 May prem 711.65 114 1,050.66 Totals Temp Check Number 57 Temp Check Number 58 5 58 Lawton Printing 01-4305-030-30 Fire codes b. 4ZO 19.35— Totals Temp Check Number 58 I emp -CKe--c-k-N-Uiffber 59 League Mn Cities 01-4400-109-09 Annl conference regr 380.00 59-re—ague n Cities 01-4400-110-10 nnl carr —regr —I50700 59 League Mn Cities 01-4402-110-10 1989 directories 26.00 2 47 a— 27 Apr 1' Claims List Thu 1:5k, I City of Mendota HE cs Temp Check Number 60 Page 10 Temp. H P 01-2074 Check prem 1,116.20 66 Med Centers N..Mhw, v0nHn%- Name 60-uWe-f --BF0-S r -He Vf--4;3-15---9i 0F-50 01-4131-110-10 g•65 Apr Svc 60 Leer tiros wi-+66o-.610-70 Apr svc 9.70 19-0 Leef-EFr—os May Apr Svc 9.65 ISO H P 29.00 T`ETt-a]Fs-Temp Check mber 60 1,953.95 66 Med Centers Temp Check Number - 63 63 M A Associates 01-4330-215-70 weed control 266.25 63 266. 25 Totals Temp Check Number 63 Temp Check Number 65 I 6-5—John Maczko shields 30.00 ----- 6-5- 30.00 7otalsTemp Check Number 65 Temp Check Number 66 66 Med Centers H P 01-2074 May prem 1,116.20 66 Med Centers H P 01-4131-110-10 May prem 984.25 66 Med Centers H P e5-4131-105-15 May prem 704.40 66 Med Centers H P 01-4131-020-20 May prem 1,953.95 66 Med Centers H P 01-4131-040-40 May prem 410.00 66 Med centers H P 01-4131-050-50 May prem 894.85 66 Med Centers H P 15-4131-060-60 May prem 190.45 6 ed Centers H P O1-4r3T---07 - May prem 528 6, 548.50 68 Metro Area Mgr Assn 01-4400-110-10 4-13 mtg 10.00 68 10.00 Totals Temp Check Number 68 Temp Check Number 69 etro Waste Control 1 - May. chgs 33, 1 —IS. 0-4---- 69 Metro Waste Control 17-3575 May chgs 2,796.08cr Totals Temp Check Number 69 27 Apr I Claims List Thu 1:50 PM City of Mendota Heights Temo Check Number 72 Page 12 Temp. Check Number Vendor Ra—rae Account Code CommentsArnount 727 S�i`g KFC' 775-700- 72 Miller Printing 15-4268-650-60 Sprg N L 258:00 --- -------- Totals Temp Check Number 72 Temp Check R—Urdber 73 73 Minn Cellular Tele Co 01-4210-020-20 Apr svc 17.75 77XMinn -I�C7er-lular Tele Co 01-4210-020-20 Apr svc 17.55 -1-4-6 35.30 Totals Temp Check Number 73 Temp Check Number 74 74 Totals Temp Check Number 74 Temp Check Number 75 75 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-2074 May prem -20. , 40 75 --Minn Mutual Life rns 0 1-4131- May prem 5.10 75 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-4131-070-70 May prem 1.70 Totals Temp Check Number 75 Temp'Check Number 7G 76 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-2074 May prem 164.82 Minnesota genefit-Assn 01-4131-110-10 May prem 249-.7-6- 76 Minnesota Benefit Assn 05-4131-105-15 May prem 320.55 76 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-4131-020-20 May prem 745.90 vl i 112-.27 76 Minnesota Benefit Assn 15-4131-060-60 May prem 12.85 76 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-4131-070-70 May prem 104.96 --- 532 ------- 1,707.05 Totals Temp Check Number 76 Temp Check Number 77 27 Apr I Claims List Page 13 Thu 1:5, -City of -Mendota Ht its 'Temp Check Number 78 Temp. Check _Number V &-n-d-6F- N a rn eAccount 056—e Commen s Amount 76 Minnesota Toro Inc 01-4305-070-70 misc parts 147.92 78�Minne�ota Toro Inc 2+3O5__0 misc parts 105:66 78 Minnesota Toro Inc 01-4305--050-50 misc parts 105.60 78 Minnesota Toro Inc 15-4305-060-60 misc parts 105.59 78_M1_nnE9-ota Toro Inc rt n 55.86cr 390 Temp Check Number 79 LTotals Temp Check Number 79 T"&m pCfTe-c5W-_N `uM b e r 80 80 Mn Dept Public Safety 01-4200-610-20 conn chgs 150.00 Be 150.00 Totals Temp Check Number 80 84 LeR-o-y-No—ack 84 38.56 contr forms al 100.00 Temp Check Number 82 86 Northern State Pow&r 01-4212-320-76'. 86 Northern State Power 01-4211-320-70 430 Tota l -s -Temp Check Number p Check Number 87 87 Dakcrest Kennels 87 Oakcrest Kennels 174 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number -,, -W- -8 S_ Oxygen Service -,, -- - _C o- 01-4221-800-90 01-4225-800-90 87 01-4305-030-3; Apr svc Apr svc Apr svc Apr Svc cyl activity 41.18 18.34 -10.30 80.00 225,00 27 Apr 1 Claims List Page 15 Thu 1:5r, A City of Mendota HL its I 'Temp Check Number 90 Temp. Check N tim de_F_V4nd_&r_z"_ NatWW— Account —en t s Arnoun lawn mix 425.00 425.00 um Temp Check Number 91 -Enterprises 0-f --W30 0=0 R stamp 5 94 17.85 Temp Check Number 95 95 Reeds Sales & Svc 285 Temp Check Number 96 15-4330-490-60 96 S & T Office Products 01-4300-020-20 rprs card file 133.44 iIs- 133.44 --450_.40 2.44 96 S & T Office Products 01-4300-020-20 note rack 3.64 [---35"S-& T Office Products 1---4300--FT0-- 10 rng binaer, 96 S & T Office Products 05-4300-105-15 rng binder 2.99 96 S & T Office Products -20 misc splys 2 .5 768 Q'7 j Che 98 L E Shaughnessy jr 01-4220-132-10 V8__L_Z_SFFa-*ug nessy jr 0 -a_-I ___ 98 L E Shaughnessy Jr 21-4220-132-00 98 L E Shaughnessy Jr 16-4220-132-00 98 L E Shaughnessy Jr 98 L E Shaughnessy Jr 15-4220-132-60 Mbet 98 Apr svc Apr Svc Apr Svc - Apr. SVC Apr Svc Apr svc Apr svc 11161.00 165. 00 248. 00 797.06 831.00 207.00 27 Apr I Claims List Thu 1:5k 1 City of Mendota In is 'Tema Check Number 102 Page 17 Temp. Check arne Account —ou F. Amount KUn-i-b-e-r-V9r-,d&—rN Coe Comments 100 Speed Print 01-4268-650-10 newsletter 140.90 102 So St Paul See Line Svc Temp Check Number, 104 01-4330-440-20 align 2243 145.47 104 Sun Newspapers 01-4240-110-10 ord 264 52.63 —110W-S—UnNewspapers 01-4240-080-80 hrg not alley vac 33.83 86.46 Totals iemp unecx NumDer 107 U S West Communications 01-4210-110-10 Apr svc 273.15 107 Q S west Communications - - .2 - Apr svc 34 107 U S West Communications 05-4210-105-15 Apr Svc 149.30 107 U B West Communications 01-4210-040-40 Apr svc 50.04 T -07 -71J -S West Communications -4210-060-60 Apr svc 90:9 107 U S_West-Communications 01-4210-030-30 Apr svc 110.98 107 U S West Communications 01-4210-050-50 Apr svc 35.49 Communications 01-4210-otw-/w 108 U S West Communications 15-4210-060-60 Apr Svc 35.50 216 Totals Temp Check Number 108 Temp Check Number 109 —1 9 Uniforms Unlimited --W� 01 Z�� =O misc Vaillancourt 80.67 197Aq 11-ifnrMs-Unl-imited 01-4410-020-20 service stripes 113.40 109 Uniforms Unlimited 01-4410-020-20 misc Olson 419.85 109 Uniforms Unlimited 01-4410-020-20 badge 2225 44.55 654 Totals Temp Check Number 109 110 United States Salt Inc 01-4421-050-50 Sal in 6344 42.19 110 42.19 27•Apr Claims Lis' Page 11 Thu I:'- JM City of Mendota E tents Temp Check Number 66 ---- I Temp. Check'— - —Number Vendor -Name ccoun��e omrnen s Amount Temp Check Number 111 111 United Way St Paul 01-2070 May contr 109.20 Totals Temp Check Number 111 113 Western Life Ins 01-4132-031-30 May prem 150.50 _ 13 150. 50 Totals Temp Check Number 113 TempeGh c ck Number 114 114 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4222-120-20 Mar pros 1,192.69 114 Winthrop & Weinstine 31-4220-839-00 Mar Re Krech 1.`'-,0.00 114 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4221-120-10 March retainer 516.40 -_ -" 14 W!i-n hrop & Weinstine 16- 20000-00 Mar Re Furlong 205.40 114 Winthrop & Weinstine 10-4220-000-00 Mar Re C G Rein 375.00 114 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-42220-120-80 Mar Re Airport noise 934.40 684 3,373.69 Totals Temp Check Number 114 CLAIMS LIST 5/2/89 MANUAL CHECKS: 12069 350.00 U. S. Post Office Newsletter postage 12070 85.55 Cecils Wkshp lunches 12n71 sn 0 qtF.- la-A.nh -rpim ur_%e-expenS. 12072 4,470.00 mWCC Audit differences 1-1-86 thru 1-1-89 12073 6.08 David Olson refAnd FICA deducted in error 12075 196.30 Continental Genl Ins Apr, May prem D. Olson 12076 300.00 Augstin Tech Inst REgr Fire schl 120J_Z-61,5-00------Coixtinexxtal-Genl-lns-----Mar,-Apr,-Ilay-Pxem-Koel.%Cb 12078 34,067.37 City M.H. Payroll A/c Net payroll 4/21 12079 6,321.43 PEPA 4/7 payroll _12.080 9- -67 COMMig,;ionwr nf Rpy valance-lat-T gar t., 12081 4,994.61 4/7 & 4/21 w/h 12082 10,910.63 Dakota Cty Bank 4/21 FIT, FICA 12083 —8*7r nn 4421_p ans _21 p .2 _21 p _p 12084 2,984.70 - SCCU 12085 95,500.00 Winthrop Weinstine Funk closing 165,582.30 G.T. 326,465.42 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEVIN . F , CITY ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: Presentation Regarding CATV DATE: April 24, 1989 Ken Henderson, Chair of the Northern Dakota County Cable Communications Commission, would like to make a 15-20 min to presentation to the Council regarding the work of the Commission. Ken will be updating you on what the Commission is doing, and how cable television is being used in the Northern Dakota County service territory. KDF:jak May 28, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin Fr� City Administrator SUBJECT: Presentation Regarding Oak Wilt Disease Mr. Mike Scharrer is a Consulting Forester who has been meeting with residents in the Hunter/Orchard Lane area regarding the problem of oak wilt disease. Attached is a letter and supporting materials Mr. Scharrer has provided your information. Mr. Scharrer has requested to be on your agenda this eveni to present his report and recommendations for dealing with the oak wilt problem in Mendota Heights. KDF/ rmd or DATE: March 1, 1989 TO: Mendota Heights Cit FROM: Mike Scharrer, Cons Forester/Arborist SUBJ: Discussion and repo status of the Mendo Community Forest, w to OAK WILT The word was spread last September and concerned city residents, several members of the Mendota Heights Park Board, gathered for a at the Noah Eisenburg residence on Hunter Lane. The Eisenburg's house. They came together out of a shared concern regarding a pro dire implications for the beauty and character of their neighborh well as that of the City of Mendota Heights as a whole. That pro OAK WILT, a killer of the most magnificient and valuable shade tr Also in attendance at that meeting was David Stephenson, OAK WILT with the MN Dept. of Agriculture, "Shade Tree Program"; Steve Kun and president of the KUNDE CO. --Forestry Consultants, OAK WILT co contractor and City Forester for North Oaks and Burnsville; and m forestry consultant specializing in OAK WILT identification and c City Forester under contract with the City of Sunfish Lake. Stev, previously conducted OAK WILT consulting and control activities f Eisenburgs and their neighbors, the Vans, who shared a very large red oak, OAK WILT infection center. We three were asked to condu to address the OAK WILT problem and its immediate implications to borhood, as well as to explore the extent of the threat facing th We presented the problem, discussed the biology and potential con of the threat to Mendota Heights, and how that threat might be fa OAK WILT is the most serious disease of shade trees in Minnesota. that the American elm was a dominant tree species along boulevards is in many communities), in parks and in many yards. But oaks out in metropolitan areas almost two -to -one and will increasingly be t tree species as communities such as Mendota Heights grow into the countryside. Each year more oaks are killed by OAK WILT than elms are killed by disease, including such years as 1977 when St. Paul alone lost ove elms. The'disease has spread very slowly northward in Minnesota t from St. Cloud to Taylors Falls, and west to a line from St. Cloud and south to Iowa. Council ting t on the a Heights th respect ncluding meeting ad a full lem with od, as lem is e species. specialist e, owner self, a ntrol, and and I had r the and active t the meeting the neigh - city itself. iderations ed. It is true (and still umber elms e dominant urround ing Dutch elm 50,000 a line to Mankato, There are approximately 3,700 acres of oak -type woodland in Dakota County, based upon the DMR/U.S. Forest Service Phase I Inventory conducted in 1978, much of which is located in the northern tier, including Mendota N ights. Oaks grow in a wide variety of sites. They can tolerate very poor soils where few other tree species survive; they last far longer than elms (often surviving for upwards of 200 years); and they have few problems other than OAK WILT and construction damage. They are attractive, sturdy and higlily valued as a shade tree and landscape specimen. A -single large red oak car add ?10,000 the property value of a city lot ! (Valuations established by International Society of Arboriculture formula.) Clearly, the oaks are a resource which Page 2 deserve our concern. The good news is that OAK WILT can be stopped and l even eliminated. As major components of the Mendota Heights community forest, the oaks valuable benefits in other respects as well, such as: perhaps - energy savings through shade and. transpirational cooling in summer, and through windbreak and insulation effects in winter (The winter sun is also allowed to help heat and light our h mes and buildings after leaf drop.) - filtering and absorbing airborne pollutants, while genera life-giving oxygen - deflecting and absorbing aircraft, highway, industrial, and other excessive noise - controlling soil erosion by wind and water - filtering and absorbing pollutants from water as it passes through the intricate tree root systems - screening unsightly views and establishing privacy - controlling glare and reflection - providing increased wildlife habitat in our urban settings - providing attractive sights, scents, and foods -- and an ov rall sense of peace and well-being, as a major factor of the high, quality of life we enjoy in this area Like Dutch elm disease, OAK WILT is caused by a fungus that induces plugging of the water -conducting system of the tree. It affects red oaks most readily but is a menace to all species of oak. After an infected red oak dies the fungus colonizes the wood under the bark and produces a 'mat" of spores. (Surprisingly, other types of oaks do not produce this mat, even though they can be infected with OAK WILT.) As this mat on an infected red oak thickens, it exert sufficient pressure to split open the bark, releasing a fermenting odor. The com on picnic beetles (known to scientists as the sap -feeding Nitidulid beetles) are attracted to this odor. They feed on these mats in great numbers and then carry spores to existing fresh wounds on healthy oaks, where infection results. Herein lies the important difference between OAK WILT and Dutch elm di ease. Elm bark beetles create wounds by feeding in elm twig crotches to introduc spores. In contrast, a fresh wound must already exist in an oak in order for tie picnic beetle to deposit OAK WILT spores. For this reason Dutch elm disease 'preads overland much faster than OAK WILT. Also for this reason OAK WILT is ontrollable, perhaps even to the point of future elimination. Almost all oak wounds, into which OAK WILT can be spread, are due to h man activity, especially new home construction. By mid-May, the ground has thawed enough to allow bulldozers to clear brush and stumps and to grade new home sites Bulldozers take to the woods in large numbers, gashing trunks and breaking limbs ff trees that builders often have promised to save. If OAK WILT•is present an here nearby (up to a few miles away), the stage is set for rapid spread into the w unded trees. Page 3 Picnic beetle activity and OAK WILT, mat production are greatest in May when otherwise healthy oaks are highly susceptible to infection. The of our communities into the wooded countrysides has resulted -in a dram increase in this artificial spread of OAK WILT. The situation is furt vated when the uninformed homeowner prunes his or her oaks in the spri After one oak is infected in a grove of oaks, another means of spread c disease sets in. As an infected oak wilts and dies, the fungus is draw adjacent healthy oaks through their interconnecting root systems (root Since oaks (more so than elms) tend to grow in mixed or pure groupings, quite susceptible to progressive destruction if one member of a groupir. fected. Approximately 90% of all new OAK WILT infections result from x transmission. But this transmission is relatively slow. Scientists es that OAK WILT moves through grafted root systems at the rate of 15-20 f year. There is no 'tcure" for OAK WILT in the sense of a cure for human disea as vaccines_ for chicken pox or antibiotics for bacterial infections. management of OAK WILT consists of preventing the disease from spreadi trees. The chief component of a management program is education, to t not to prune or otherwise wound healthy oak trees during May arid June. second component is to cut the interconnected root systems so the spre disease in an infected area is halted. A.modified vibratory plow, of normally used to bury telephone or power cables, has proven most effec stopping root graft spread of OAK WILT. The third part of a mariagemen consists of preventing sporulation of the fungus by treating those few which spores will form in May and June. Because OAK WILT•is slower mo Dutch elm disease, a modest program in each community such as Mendota with sizeable oak populations, can reduce the disease to a minor probl program should further consist of inspections for OAK WILT during the season, by a State certified Tree Inspector and dissemination of infor appropriate technical expertise to those property owners experiencing A city ordinance addressing OAK WILT and other important issues relate, community forest of Mendota Heights, should also be established. If 1 checked and if aided by activities of an ignorant public, OAK WILT wil: large portions of our exceedingly valuable oak forests -- both urban a� At the neighborhood meeting last fall, I was asked by the residents in to make a rudimentary, drive-through inspectim of the city to determir an initial basis, the extent of OAK WILT infection sites within the cii were expressions of great concern as to the implications of the disease in Mendota Heights. I was asked, as well, to present this report and i to the City Council for consideration and, after such presentation, to proposal for city OAK WILT inspections and control proceedures. nd June,, owth is r aggra- the into rafts). they are is in- ot graft imate et per s, such 'herefore, to healthy ch people The of the e type ve in program rees on ng than fights, . This owing tion and e problem. to the t un - destroy rural,, ttendance on There threat formation rovide a Page 4 Sites determined or suspected as having OAK WILT infection centers in a istance are as follows, including species of oak involved and number of trees wing died or currently threatened: Location Species # of trees a pr x. Hunter Lane red oak 15+ Culligan Lane red oak/bur oak 10+ Hwy 110, west of bur oak 3+ Lexington Ave. Ivy Falls Court white oak 3+ Glen Hill Road bur oak 2+ SE corner of Lexington and Hwy 13 red oak/bur oak 7+ London Road bur oak 2+ Cherry Hill Road red oak 4+ Douglas Road red oak 3+ Rogers Court bur oak 2+ Keokuk Lane red oak 3+ There also appears to be quite a number of red, white, and bur oak infe centers in wooded property and new development areas, such as south of section of Mendota Heights Road and Bridgeview Couxt. Other such infec .are evident or suspected in development areas in the Copperfield Additi Centex Homes development projects, west of Sunfish Lake. These are mul with large numbers of dead or threatened oaks, of the various species. :tion :he inter - ;ion centers )n and :iple sites, On the basis of this initial information regarding the existance of OAE WILT in the City of Mendota Heights, combined with what is specifically known as to the extent of the disease in Sunfish Lake, Inver Grove Heights, West St. Paul, Eagan, and other surrounding communities, I would encourage the City Council to give special consideration to beginning a program of OAK WILIP control. Please act now to preserve the valuable amenities provided by your imp o tant oak resource. Respectfully submitted: Mike Scharrer Consulting Forester/Arborist 4711 S. Nokomis Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55406 722-9494 Oaks and oak will 0 Range of red oak Known ® range of oak wilt Source: Minnesota Dept. of Agriculture Oak wilt is a greater pro- blem in Minnesota than anywhere else, and is spreading rapidly in the state, according to the State Shade Tree Ad- visory Committee. J r T By Dean fiebuManiiStaff Wester } summer, and now is the time to take Steps to ensure they •. `remain healthy. ow is the time for all good Minnesotans to conroto the aid of their oaks. "Oak wilt is a human problem.• said Donald Wiltake. "It has always been present in ow forests• but if left alone it's Minnesota's oaks — an estimated 234 melion a minor problem, killing a tree here and there. The epi- trees — are threatened by oak wilt, which has•replaced demic oak is of wilt we're seeing caused by humans whoDutch elm disease as the most serious threat to our urban are messing up the forest in an unknowing, sometimes ro"okwitt suburban of tincarlaq, manner .. wilt ul thousands of the statea most plentifak andtyvaluable shade tree, and the disease is spreading. � • Willeke is chairman of the State Shade Tree Advisory Committee, which wants the Legislature to approve fundsTwin But all is not lost Unlike Dutch elm disease, oak wilt can for a vigorous program to fight oak wilt and other tree Cities be hafted, perhaps even eliminated, Although foresters diseases. Although the lawmakers allocated considerable say a statewide program is needed to stop oak wilt, money from 1975 to 1982 to fight Dutch elm disease, Property owners can do much to protect their trees. Oaks funds have been cut severely as part of the overall are most vulnerable to the disease In spring and early trimming of the state budget Willeke's committee says it's essential that the Legislature financially rejuvenate and expand the shade -tree program, and the key reason is the onslaught of o 4^yam n k wilt. Y , The disease is caused by a fungus that kilts an oak by plugging its vascula systems, blocking «-= ,<•' the internal movement of life-giving water. Although it attacks all s es `* f oak, the most 'g susceptible are members of the red oak family,Including ng pin oak, black o and northern red z w' oak, the most common species in Minnesota. infected red oaks die rapids `p , usually within a e ': x;= few weeks after the.disease is first detected. Less vulnerable are members of the white oak family, including white oak, bur oak and swamp white oak. Infected white oaks may five for several years before succumbing to oak Wilt, Oaks Continued on page 2C Ole PICNIC BEETLE Oak wilt spores stick to the beetles. The beetles then can infect healthy oaks through fresh wounds in the bark: limbs broken by construction equipment or recently -pruned branches. Oaks should not be pruned from about April 15 to July because that Is when they are- most susceptible to infection through open wounds. It such wounds are unavoidable, they should quickly be covered with a nontoxic paint or tree wound dressing. VASCULAR SYSTEM Oak wilt fungus kills trees by clogging their water -carrying vascular systems. After an infected red oak dies the fungus colonizes the wood under the bark, producing a mat of spores. The growing mat splits open the bark; releasing an odor that attracts the common picnic beetle and other insects. ROOTS Oak wilt fungus can spread through interconnected roots from infected to healthy trees as much as 50 feet apart. The solution is to dig a barrier in the soil around the infected tree. That can be done by cutting the grafted roots with a modified vibratory plow, of the type normally used to bury telephone cables. Care must be taken to avcid buried utility lines. LEAVES' d .r The first sign of oak wilt is the wilting of a tree's leaves. Individual leave wilt from tips to bases, turning dull green, theq brown. infected oaks wilt from the top of thec own downward. Fallen leaves from an infected tree are likely to be green at the base. A redo k will wilt completely within two weeks 4f the first symptoms of infection, white oaks wilt more slowly, but no species of oak Pative to Minnesota is immune to the disease. 110 (O'ER) .a� t •pl - wl ellpfc-. -�- r ...,�' �;•rrr- r ,� �; . r r t� r •�.,, '►r.rAlt �l {{jrf f s- 'r r � � -r--� -sem' ,.s--'..�•:.�/,rk • t �[~�"• , i •( r,i rig .,'�',,`"�'r±%". , .. .:-r ? � - r—'- tr- rte' �«...5�, :=�.•.';aa�,: . �--•'r.",-�. • �r-:'_— �- ^� =` s '" Iflustr tion by Billy Steve Clayton This is a crucial period. The beetles are not attracted specifically to oaks, nor can they wound the bark of healthy trees. But they can intro- duce the disease through wounds that are only a few days old and which have been made betweerr mid—May and mid—June. (To pro- vide an added margin of safety, foresters say that property owners should consider April 15 tt� July to be the crucial period). That's when the production of the furigus mats is greatest, and when otherwise healthy oaks are highly susceptible to infliction. If a tree has no fresh wounds in its bark, there's no problem. But man's carelessness creates wounds: property owners prune branches, construction efuipment breaks limbs. According to Willske and French, the growth of Twin Cities suburbs into the wooded countryside has increased the num- ber of wounded trees greatly and is used to bury telephone cables, td sever the grafted roots in the soil -around* the diseased oak. The plow has a 5 -foot blade, and care must- ' be taken to avoid buried utility lines, • Another solution is to use a soil ••• sterilant called Vapam to isolatethe diseased tree, although French eYn - phasized _that this is not nearly as effective as using a vibratory plow. For more information about control- ling oak.wilf,Gontact the Minnese'tq Department of Natural Resources ' or the Extension Service at the Uhl versity of Minnesota. Also, French has written a helpful free brochuve "Oak Wilt in Minnesota," that can be obtained from the state Depart- ment of Agriculture or the ' - l7xA1_-U service. attheUnr versity's St. Paul campus(C-011 1- 976- oZO©), the major reason for ttte increasing A�{ . incidence of oak wilt in'Minnesota.- Continuied..1mm page 1C 'Bu't the p OLUtom can be solved. Willeke and French strongly recom, If you re wofidering-to which1amify, your 4ks7661ong, Hire's'a rule of . ' thumb: red oaks have leaves with they must prune, they should imme- pointed edges; the leaves of white .. 060 `- member. X111 species can be striek--dressing. That•will prevent disease - =beetles en by the disease. ; _;� IL wound. The two men also urge . The fungus is spread in two ways: property owners to ensure that - by insects, especiafry-ffi-d' common construction,equipment not wound picnic beetle, and through the inter- ::,trees, and that paint or tree wound connected roots of infected and ; dressing be applied if an oak has a healthy oaks. The first sign that an limb broken by spring storms- or oak is infected is when its leaves ' wind. wilt, turning dull green, then brown. Pill � N the leaves to their bases. It begins fe'cting healthy trees is the easiest at the top of a tree's crown, then t spreads downward. Fallen leaves A more difficult and costly methdcl from an infected tree are likely to • be green at the base. is to prevent the fungus from mi- _ grating through'roots from infected. oaks to healthy trees. � 01 in a red oak, its over. Nobody - S knows of any-Yed oak that has PP recovered," said David French, a cies of shade tree, generally exist professor of plant pathology at the VP 00 Mo studied oak wilt for 40 years. tive oaks, many Twin Cities sub- W p f�8 He stressed that it is far easier and large, private grove can have a � M • dozen or more trees. : try to eradicate the disease once it ' is established in an oak grove. One Therein lies the rub. Oak wilt fun- method is to prevent picnic beetles gus can spread through intercori- SL netted roots from an infected tree- reehealthytrees. healthy.-trees. Pe CL apart Such interconnected, or loot The insect picks up the disease by grafted, root systems are commoh C-5 • 3 C among oaks, and may even occur �whti a the tree dies,. wilt fungus colo- between oaks of different species and nizes the wcdbd under the bark, pro- ducing a mat of spores. The mat Isolating the diseased tree is the i best way to prevent the spread of releases a fermenting odor that at- oak wilt through roots, and that ' 11, .. n� requires experienced, professional I foresters. They use a modified vi - on their bodies. bratory plow, of the type usually: • I fA dD Ma 4, \ i C- C? This is a crucial period. The beetles are not attracted specifically to oaks, nor can they wound the bark of healthy trees. But they can intro- duce the disease through wounds that are only a few days old and which have been made betweerr mid—May and mid—June. (To pro- vide an added margin of safety, foresters say that property owners should consider April 15 tt� July to be the crucial period). That's when the production of the furigus mats is greatest, and when otherwise healthy oaks are highly susceptible to infliction. If a tree has no fresh wounds in its bark, there's no problem. But man's carelessness creates wounds: property owners prune branches, construction efuipment breaks limbs. According to Willske and French, the growth of Twin Cities suburbs into the wooded countryside has increased the num- ber of wounded trees greatly and is used to bury telephone cables, td sever the grafted roots in the soil -around* the diseased oak. The plow has a 5 -foot blade, and care must- ' be taken to avoid buried utility lines, • Another solution is to use a soil ••• sterilant called Vapam to isolatethe diseased tree, although French eYn - phasized _that this is not nearly as effective as using a vibratory plow. For more information about control- ling oak.wilf,Gontact the Minnese'tq Department of Natural Resources ' or the Extension Service at the Uhl versity of Minnesota. Also, French has written a helpful free brochuve "Oak Wilt in Minnesota," that can be obtained from the state Depart- ment of Agriculture or the ' - l7xA1_-U service. attheUnr versity's St. Paul campus(C-011 1- 976- oZO©), the major reason for ttte increasing A�{ . incidence of oak wilt in'Minnesota.- Continuied..1mm page 1C 'Bu't the p OLUtom can be solved. Willeke and French strongly recom, If you re wofidering-to which1amify, your 4ks7661ong, Hire's'a rule of . • - mend that property owners not - prune oaks from April 15 to July If•�, • thumb: red oaks have leaves with they must prune, they should imme- pointed edges; the leaves of white "` diately crver•womds in the bark oaks have rounded edges. But re= ;. ; twith a nontoxic paint or tree wound member. X111 species can be striek--dressing. That•will prevent disease - =beetles en by the disease. ; _;� from entering the ;,•; , wound. The two men also urge . The fungus is spread in two ways: property owners to ensure that - by insects, especiafry-ffi-d' common construction,equipment not wound picnic beetle, and through the inter- ::,trees, and that paint or tree wound connected roots of infected and ; dressing be applied if an oak has a healthy oaks. The first sign that an limb broken by spring storms- or oak is infected is when its leaves ' wind. wilt, turning dull green, then brown. The wilting spreads from the bps of But prevdntirig the beetles from in the leaves to their bases. It begins fe'cting healthy trees is the easiest at the top of a tree's crown, then way to block the spread pf oak wi•jt spreads downward. Fallen leaves A more difficult and costly methdcl from an infected tree are likely to • be green at the base. is to prevent the fungus from mi- _ grating through'roots from infected. oaks to healthy trees. "Once you seethe signs of oak wilt in a red oak, its over. Nobody - • That's important because our na-• knows of any-Yed oak that has tive oaks, -unlike many :eater spe-• recovered," said David French, a cies of shade tree, generally exist professor of plant pathology at the in pure stands or groves. Although University of Minnesota, who has Minneapolis has relatively'few na- studied oak wilt for 40 years. tive oaks, many Twin Cities sub- urbs have extensive groves, and He stressed that it is far easier and large, private grove can have a cheaper to prevent oak wilt than to • dozen or more trees. : try to eradicate the disease once it ' is established in an oak grove. One Therein lies the rub. Oak wilt fun- method is to prevent picnic beetles gus can spread through intercori- from intr'•oducing the disease into netted roots from an infected tree- reehealthytrees. healthy.-trees. -to a healthy oak as much as 50feet apart Such interconnected, or loot The insect picks up the disease by grafted, root systems are commoh visiting an infected red oak. After oak among oaks, and may even occur �whti a the tree dies,. wilt fungus colo- between oaks of different species and nizes the wcdbd under the bark, pro- ducing a mat of spores. The mat Isolating the diseased tree is the thickens. splits open the bark, and best way to prevent the spread of releases a fermenting odor that at- oak wilt through roots, and that ' 11, .. tracts the beetles. They feed on the requires experienced, professional mat. then leave, carrying the spores foresters. They use a modified vi - on their bodies. bratory plow, of the type usually: This is a crucial period. The beetles are not attracted specifically to oaks, nor can they wound the bark of healthy trees. But they can intro- duce the disease through wounds that are only a few days old and which have been made betweerr mid—May and mid—June. (To pro- vide an added margin of safety, foresters say that property owners should consider April 15 tt� July to be the crucial period). That's when the production of the furigus mats is greatest, and when otherwise healthy oaks are highly susceptible to infliction. If a tree has no fresh wounds in its bark, there's no problem. But man's carelessness creates wounds: property owners prune branches, construction efuipment breaks limbs. According to Willske and French, the growth of Twin Cities suburbs into the wooded countryside has increased the num- ber of wounded trees greatly and is used to bury telephone cables, td sever the grafted roots in the soil -around* the diseased oak. The plow has a 5 -foot blade, and care must- ' be taken to avoid buried utility lines, • Another solution is to use a soil ••• sterilant called Vapam to isolatethe diseased tree, although French eYn - phasized _that this is not nearly as effective as using a vibratory plow. For more information about control- ling oak.wilf,Gontact the Minnese'tq Department of Natural Resources ' or the Extension Service at the Uhl versity of Minnesota. Also, French has written a helpful free brochuve "Oak Wilt in Minnesota," that can be obtained from the state Depart- ment of Agriculture or the ' - l7xA1_-U service. attheUnr versity's St. Paul campus(C-011 1- 976- oZO©), Cj 110 The attached items are newsletter articles, one previously distributed in Sunfish Lake and one to be currently utilized. I r CITY OF SU Y Sk Za e MINNESOTA OAK WILT IN SUNFISH LAKE I If you have oaks on your property, you should be concerned about a I disease which threatens them -- oak wilt. Oak wilt, like Dutch el "I is a vascular wilt disease and it affects all of out native oak spe Red and Pin oaks ( oaks with pointed leaf edges) are most susceptib disease and can be killed within a few weeks. '-,Ihite and Bur oaks ( rounded leaf edges) are less susceptible but can still become disea may live for several years with an oak wilt infection dying slowly, a time,with leaf discoloration resembling autumn colors. Oak wilt is caused by a fungus which plugs up the tree's water tran causing it to wilt and die. The fungus can Be carried from disease trees by insect carriers er by moving through common root systems. must be able to carry the oak wilt fungus spores from a diseased oa fresh wound on any healthy oak. Leaves on affected trees turn a du or bronze color from the leaf tip toward the base. In Red and Pin wilting is first most obvious at the top of the tree. White of Bus have wilting branches scattered throughout the crown. During the g samples of wilting oaks can be cultured for the oak wilt fungus. erious disease, ies. The e to the aks with ed. Some a branch at port system to healthy Insects to a green aks, the oaks may owing season, Cak wilt can be controlled by early detection and mechanical or the ical disruption of root grafts between healthy and diseased trees. Also oaks should not be pruned, or otherwise wounded between April 15 and Jul. 1, since they are most susceptible to infection through pen wounds during that time period. The Sunfish Lake City Forester will be inspecting the city for signs of oak wilt throughout the growing season and assisting property owners wit control of the disease. If you know or suspect that you have oak wilt on yo r property, or have questiDns concerning this important problem, please contact he City Forester at 722-9494. Don't let our oaks vanish as our elms have. et's stop oak wilt now! NOBS RELEASE PRUNING OAKS NOW CAN ENDANGER TREES "Injuring oaks now, from April 15 to July 1, could leave your treeE to oak wilt," Mike Sebarrer of Mpls., a consulting forester arborist anc Lake City Forester, declared. "Oak wilt spreads in two ways: from infected trees to neighboring trees through grafted or common toot systems; or by sap—feeding insects beetles) that can transfer the reproductive fungal spores from infected healthy oaks while feeding, infecting them with oak wilt." The threat of insect spread is greatest now, from April 15 to July are only susceptible to insect infection during this period of rapid sp Unable to chew through the bark of treest the only way the picnic beetl healthy oaks is through fresh wounds (1-2 days old) during this period Scharrer. susceptible Sunfish aal thy (picnic trees to 1. "Oaks ing growth. can infect time," said Preventing insect spread of oak wilt is easy: DON'T PRUNE IN MAY O� JUNE. If an oak is injured or must be pruned or out during this period of time toxic tree wound dressing should be applied immediately to the wound. T only condition requiring that a tree wound dressing be used on a tree. once in a tree, oak wilt will spread through grafted or common rootl adjacent healthy ones. If this happens, root separation proceedures are Contact Mike Scbarrer at 722-9494 for further information. 0 a non - Ls is the systems to necessary* CITY OF SU!!fiSh MINNESOTA OAK WILT in SUNFISH LAKE The City of Sunfish Lake has a unique resource; it: .inapt oak woodland. Few locations in the immediate Metz can.offer the character, beauty and value of such a sett Its value is great. Beside the immediate aesthetic and benefits , the oak woodland provides visual screening, me temperature and wind effects, a filtering an`d reduction and noise pollution, improved water quality and erosion and habitat for a great variety of wildlife. These bene take on new meaning and value with each changing season. predom- o-area ing. recreational dification of of air control, fits The woodland setting of Sunfish Lake is what makes Iliving here so special, and is also a major attraction to incre sed re- sidential development. This increased development, howe er, has the potential for disaster with respect to the same oak oodland that provides the original attraction. This disaster is called "Oak Wilt", a fungal diseas plugs an oak's vacular system, resulting in death. Onc death is imminent. The disease spreads predominantly th interconnecting root grafts between oaks of the same spe __-oak to.red oak, white oak to white oak, etc.) It origin any separate location through initial infection of an op wound during the critical susceptibility period of mid -A to early July, when "spring wood" is actively forming. These open wounds can result naturally through squi activity, wind or ice damage, but more directly occurs t the activity of man. Pruning or other wounding of oaks residential setting, or during construction/development is the major cause of new Oak Wilt infection centers. T way to prevent infection of such wounds -is through promp cation of an asphalt based pruning "sealer". Such wound be initially prevented during the susceptible period, if possible., I!riy major emphasis as City Forester of Sunfish Lake, to inspect for Oak hilt infection, but more importantly vide the information necessary for property owners (and ers) - to understand and prevent the occurrence of the pro in the _first place. (over) that infected ies (red tes in 1 n a ctivities, e only appli- ng should at all is o pro- evelop- lem FU M. The Oak Wilt problem in Sunfish Lake has fluctuated over the years since my involvement as City Forester, due to natural and man -related variables; but through increased efforts I believe the incidence of infection can be further .. reduced. My efforts grill coincide with those of the Inver Grove Heights and other area Community Forestry Programs, as part of an overall state-wide control eft ort coordinated through the 1-4innesota Depts. <Qff-.-:-gf-`c Mare f (Shade Tree Program) and Natural Resources. X /181 1792 1 ? SO 197* 1985 / glvla /997 117919 According to 1978 Phase I inventory (USDA Forest Service/YIN DNR), there is approximately 3,700 acres of Oak -type woodland in Dakota County, susceptible to Oak Wilt - much of which is locat- ed in the northern tier, including Sunfish Lake. Respectfully submitted this date, October 16. 1988 . -Mike Scharrer Sunfish Lake City Forester OAK WILT CONTROL AND PREVENTION ON CONSTRUCTION SITES A PUBLICATION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE HOW OAK WILT KILLS TREES Oak wilt is a fungus that attacks the water conducting system of the tree, located just beneath the bark. To block the fungus, the tree produces gums and resins which plug the water conducting vessels. Unable to contain the faster fungus, the .tree ultimately cuts off its' water and nutrient supply between roots and crown. The tree w,ilts and dies. All oak species can get oak wilt. Red oaks are very susceptible and, once infected, will die in a fewv�eeks. More resistant white and bur oaks may take much longer to die. SPREAD Oak wilt spreads in two ways: from infected trees to neighboring healthy trees through grafted or common root systems; or by sap -feeding insects (picnic beetles) that, while feeding, can pick up the reproductive funga� spores from infected trees and carry them to healthy oaks with fresh wounds, infecting them with oak wilt. PREVENTION If there is no oak wilt in your development, the insect vector is the greatest threat. While only 5-10 of oak wilt infections are caused by insects, this is the only way oak wilt can spread over highways, water, and oper fields. Oak trees are only susceptible to insect infection during the rapid period of growth in the spring. Because the icnic beetle cannot chew through the bark of trees, fresh wounds are necessary. Prevention is easy. Do not injure or wound oak trees during the spring, from April 15 to July 1! Key Steps - To reduce the possibility of spring wounding: * Evaluate the site to determine how much area is needed for buildings and maneuvering equipment. Trees within 15 feet of this area will most likely not survive construction impacts and should be removed. * Ideally, complete necessary tree removal prior to April 15, or wait until July. * Install physical barriers, such as snow fence, around the remaining trees (at least 10 feet away fror i them) to further reduce the chance of wounding and soil compaction. * All equipment operators should carry a can of tree paint and apply it immediately if wounding occursn oak trees during the critical period of time - April 15 to July 1. lo Once even one tree is infected, the fungus will begin spreading to adjacent oaks through interconnected r of systems. Root grafts between oak trees of the same species are very common and can occur between trees that arep to 50 feet apart. If nothing is done, all oak trees on the site may die. CONTROL The concept of control is simple: isolate the fungus by severing the roots between infected and healthy oaks (called root graft barriers). Removing infected trees is not enough. By the time the wilt symptoms are visible, the fungus has already spread throughout the tree and into the roots. Removing the tree before root linkages are broken i an actually accelerate the movement of the fungus into surrounding trees. Vibratory (cable) plows or trenchers with five foot blades or booms are the most effective way to sever cmmon root systems. This blade length is necessary to ensure all roots are severed. The vibratory plow is most effici nt because of its speed and absence of a trench to backfill. Correctly locating the barriers is extremely important to successfully stop the disease. The most critical line is one placed between the first healthy trees from the infection, and the next set of healthy trees. Having a person experienced in oak wilt control lay out these barriers is strongly recommended. The local city forester may be able to help, or you can contact the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) for a list of oak wilt consultants and contractors with vibratory plows. Note: Placing root graft barriers before construction begins will yield the greatest success in stopping the disease, and is the most cost-effective time to do it. Once utilities are buried and buildings are in, this work becomes much more difficult. SUMMARY Oak wilt is the most serious shade tree disease in Minnesota. A Department of Natural Resources (DNR) survey of oak wilt shows that nearly all infections are associated with construction. If your development sites are currently free of oak wilt, prevention is easy and involves only minor modifications in construction practices. Once oak wilt is established in an area, control is necessary. Obviously, there are costs involved with this work. But the alternative costs of doing nothing (decline in property value, treeremoval, skeptical buyers, potential liability problems, etc.) may be far more expensive. The Departments of Agriculture and Natural Resources can help you determine whether oak wilt exists on your development sites. An aerial inventory of oak wilt in 45 townships north of the Twin Cities (the area hardest hit by oak wilt) was completed last year. Computer generated maps of oak wilt infections in this area (down to a map size of 40 acres) are available (May, 1989). For these maps or other information on oak wilt and its' control, please contact the MDA or the DNR. RED OAKS DIAGNOSED AS HAVING OAK WILT Do not remove diseased trees nght away. This 11<-NN1 I Control measures may be necessary. I may accelerate the movement of the fungus there other Disrupt common root systems with a into surrounding healthy oaks through root healthy red oaks YES vibratory plow (5 ft. blade), or use VAPAM nearby (within (chemical barrier) to isolate these root 50 feet)? systems. NO These trees are in danger of producing spores during the springtime (the only time insect transmission is a problem). These trees need Did to be removed prior to April 15 of the the trees NO CFS Unless these trees are in danger of falling following year and covered with 4+ mil die in July or on people or property, they can be removed plastic from April 15 to July 1. This wood August? when convenient, and the wood used. can be used. Do not trim or wound healthy oak trees during the springtime, from April 15 to July 1. The only way a healthy tree can become infected by the insect is via fresh wounds during this period of time. If an oak is injured at this time of year, cover wound immediately with a tree wound dressing. Flowchart - Oak wilt control in red oaks MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE OAK WILT CONTROL PROGRAM Plant Industry Division 90 West Plato Boulevard St. Paul, Minnesota 55107 Telephone: (612) 296-3349 3/89 ORGANIZING A COMMUNITY OAK WILT CONTROL PROGRAM A PUBLICATION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Oak wilt is threatening the urban and rural forests of Minnesota. Without control programs, many stately oaks will soon be lost in numerous communities in southeastern Minnesota. Affected counties are Anoka, Blue Earth, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Dodge, Faribault, Fillmore, Freeborn, Goodhue, Hennepin, Houston, Isanti, Le Sueur, McLeod, Mower, Nicollet, Olmsted, Ramsey, Rice, Scott, Sherburne, Sibley, Steele, Wabasha, Waseca, Washington, Winona and Wright. Is your community in one of them? - If so, a community oak wilt control program is needed. Does your community have one? - If not, who will organize it? And how should they go about it? This brief brochure was written to help persons interested in such a program get started. WHAT'S THE FIRST STEP? It's best to first get an idea of the extent of oak wilt in yi Ramsey, Sherburne or Washington county, computer-generated available in 1989. For other areas of Minnesota, the informa computerized; however, staff members in the shade tree progran Plant Industry division, will assist you in your search. Call (612) Boulevard, St. Paul 55107. Once you have an idea about the size of the problem, together and start planning your oak wilt campaign. Here are sc nity. Ea. snt range of oak in Minnesota ur community. If you live in Anoka, Inisago, Isanti, naps based on the DNR oak wilt inventory should be ion may be more difficult to access, since it is not at the Minnesota Department of Agric ulture (MDA), 296-0592 or write Dave Stephenson a. 90 West Plato a group of interested persons in Te community ideas for "selling" the program tq your commu- TAKE IT TO THE COUNCIL You might start by trying to get on the city council's agenda. Alihough strategies for this may vary from community to community, as a general rule itis best to start by contacting the city clerk. Tell him or he that you wish to have oak wilt control on an agenda; generally clerks like to have an outline of what you're going to talk about and an estimate of the time needed for the presentation. Ten minutes should be adequate to make an initia presentation. Assemble a delegation to sell the idea to the city council. If they group attending the council meeting will be small, it might be good to take along a petition with additional signatures to indicate a greater interest in the oa wilt problem. Depending upon the response you get from the council, yIou may want to follow up with other ki nds of actions. The size of your community and the amount of municipal moniesavailable to deal with oak wilt will di •tate what your next steps will be. A good start is to propose council adoption of a tree disease ordinance. A model ordim nce, avai ]able from MDA, is in compliance with state statutes and provides a good framework for an oak wilt control program. (If your community has a Tree Board, make your presentation to the board.) 'Dave Stephenson and I have already coordinated efforts and information with regard to Mendota Heights Qk' problems. snt range of oak in Minnesota ur community. If you live in Anoka, Inisago, Isanti, naps based on the DNR oak wilt inventory should be ion may be more difficult to access, since it is not at the Minnesota Department of Agric ulture (MDA), 296-0592 or write Dave Stephenson a. 90 West Plato a group of interested persons in Te community ideas for "selling" the program tq your commu- TAKE IT TO THE COUNCIL You might start by trying to get on the city council's agenda. Alihough strategies for this may vary from community to community, as a general rule itis best to start by contacting the city clerk. Tell him or he that you wish to have oak wilt control on an agenda; generally clerks like to have an outline of what you're going to talk about and an estimate of the time needed for the presentation. Ten minutes should be adequate to make an initia presentation. Assemble a delegation to sell the idea to the city council. If they group attending the council meeting will be small, it might be good to take along a petition with additional signatures to indicate a greater interest in the oa wilt problem. Depending upon the response you get from the council, yIou may want to follow up with other ki nds of actions. The size of your community and the amount of municipal moniesavailable to deal with oak wilt will di •tate what your next steps will be. A good start is to propose council adoption of a tree disease ordinance. A model ordim nce, avai ]able from MDA, is in compliance with state statutes and provides a good framework for an oak wilt control program. (If your community has a Tree Board, make your presentation to the board.) 'Dave Stephenson and I have already coordinated efforts and information with regard to Mendota Heights Qk' problems. FORM A TREE BOARD (or establish as a special function of the City Council or Park Roard ) If your community does not have a Tree Board, you might suggest starting one. A Tree Board, an official group similar to a Park Board, oversees tree disease programs and makes recommendations to the council. This establishes community -wide input and support for an oak wilt program. The formation of a Tree Board could be part of your petition. You could propose that the Tree Board study the oak wilt problem and recommend steps to the council; in that case, it might become the body responsible for meeting with experts. FIND CERTIFIED TREE INSPECTOR EDUCATE YOURSELF Try to enlarge your group, seeking private citizens who are active in the community to help better demonstrate the need for an oak wilt control program. Try to pull in other people with expertise. The primary purpose of the Department of Agriculture's oak wilt program is community assistance. Education on oak wilt is probably the most important step. Much of oak wilt's damage can be stopped by knowing what to do. The Department of Agriculture has expertise and resources to help you start your oak wilt campaign and can provide technical assistance in the control effort once the program is up and running. EDUCATE OTHERS Working with your enlarged group, pull together an outline of a program that would fit your community's needs and budget. WHERE TO GO FROM HERE If you have utilized all of these ideas effectively, you will have built a solid foundation for your oak wilt control program. What else could you do? Consider nominating an Oak Watcher for each neighborhood in your community, someone who will keep an eye on the oaks and notify the city forester about suspected cases of oak wilt. Involve other groups in your community, too. Perhaps you can get the Jaycees, or the Rotary, or the Master Garden- ers, or the garden club, or the YMCA, or the YWCA, or the Scouts, or the 4-H, or other youth groups interested. Providing a speaker is often the best way to capture this interest. Remember, you are doing them a favor by alerting them to the problem of oak wilt and what it could do to the urban forest in your community, their community! MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE OAK WILT PROGRAM 1/89 The attached ordinances are examples addressing OAK WILT and other community forestry issues. Minnesota Departm rt SAMPLE SHADE TREE I .101. TREE 101.01 Declaration of Policy. The Council has determined that the municipal limits are threatened by fatal di wilt, respectfully. It has further been det growing upon private`andpublic property property within the City and impair the saf fence of the public. It is declared to be prevent the spread of these diseases and this of Agriculture EASE ORDINANCES ;EASES lith of the 'elm and oak tre kses known as Dutch elm diE iined that the loss of elm uld substantially depreciate good order, general welfar intention of the Council t Jcle is enacted for that purp( 101.02 Designation of a Tree Disease Control' Area. The Council shall designate a Dutch elm disease and or an oak wil or areas within the City in which these shade tree disease ordinances and c ures shall be enacted. 10 14 101.03 Appointment of a Tree Inspector. The Council shall designate a tree inspector or tree inspectors, ce Minnesota Commissioner of 'Agriculture, who shall administer the Dutc and/or oak wilt control programs for the Gity in accordance with these ordinances and within the designated Dutch elm disease and/or oak wilt of the City. 101.04 Nuisances Declared. The following are declared to be public nuisances whenever and 1 may be found within the designated Dutchelm disease and/or oak wilt within the City: (a) Any standing 'o7r living tree or parl thereof infected to any de Dutch elm disease fungus, Ceratocystis ulr4i (Busiman) Moreau, or whit of the elm bark beetles, Scolytus multistriatils (Eichh) or Hylurgopinus rul And also, any dead elm tree or part thereof with bark intact including I stumps, or firewood which has not been disposed of properly. . (b) Any living or standing tree or part I thereof in - the red oak groug oak, scarlet oak, black oak) infected to any degree with the oak wilt fungus fagacearum (Bretz) Hunt. I - - (c) Also, any living or standing tree in the white oak group (white bicolor oak) that poses a threat of transmission of- the oak wilt fungus of the same species through interconnected root systems. Plant Industry 0ivision 90 West Plato Boulevard St. Paul, Minnesota 55107 Telephone: (612) 2ir*-3349 !s within the ?ase and oak nd oak trees the value of and conven- I Control and control area �ntrol proced- tified by the elm disease tree disease control areas herevdr they control areas Pree with the I harbors any pes (Marsch). gs, branches, (red oak, pin Ceratocystis oak, bur oak, o -other -trees ! r- benefit an entire neighborhood, the tree inspector shall recommend and encourage 'neigh- borhood participation and cooperation, including cost sharing, in root graft disruption and other -control efforts, especially, where oak wilt is in danger of spreading across property boundaries. 101.10 Transporting Elm and Oak Wood Prohibited. It is unlawful for any person to transport within the City any bark intact elm wood, or wood from the red oak group that is determined to be hazardous, without having obtained a permit from the City tree inspector. The City, tree inspector shall grant such permits only when such permission does not interfere with the provisions of this ordinance.! 101.11 Penalty. Any person, firm or corporation who violates the conditions of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor and may be punished by a fine not to exceed $300.00 or imprison- ment for 90 days. ; il - ON Notes: 1) Ordinance 101.08(a) The administrative fee of $50 encourages property owners to take the steps for abatement themselves. Without it, some residents may' decide it is easier to have the City take care of it, and delay their payment until property taxes are due the following year. 2) Ordinance 101.09 If the' community decides not to require root graft disruption at property boundaries (parts a and b), part c. should still be adopted. A community's shade tree disease ordinances, with the exception of 101.08(a) (the part about the administrative fee of $50 as described in note 2) and 101.09, must be at :least as stringent as these sample ordinances to meet the requirements of the State Shade Tree Disease Statutes. V, n 1103. Control of Disease, Insect Infestation, an ,Other Hazardous -Conditions Relating to Trees SECTION 1103.01 Finding: %_V The City Council of Sunfish Lake hereby finds and d that hazardous conditions may now or in the future, exis the city limits of the City of Sunfish Lake witli-respect disea . se or insect infestations,.or:other-factors resulti death or weakening of all,.or major parts of--individual.t These conditions will-adverselv*affect the hg'alth and we Sunfish Lake.' SECTION 1103.02 Declaration of Policy: The City of'Sunfish Lake has determined-thattrees the municipal limits are currently -or may in the future subject to hazard ' ous conditions resulting from insect in or disease; storm or mechanical damage; or other biotic abiotic agents. It has further determined that -such haz conditions resulting in' the spread of disease or insect tion, or in the potential danger of windfall (or"other b of significant, weakened or dead standing tree material in the vicinity oficommon property boundaries -or travel would substantially depreciate -the value of property wit -City and impair the safety, good order, general welfare, convenience of�the public. The health of`6ak.tr6es with municipal limits -is specifically- threatened by a fatal d commonly known as Oak Wilt, caused by'inf6ction of the f Ceratocystis fagacearum. It is declared to . be the inters the City Council to control and prevent the spread of -an, or insect.infestation, and to control the potential Bang by significant, weakened or*dedA standing tree material across common property boundaries or onto common.travel This Ordinance is enacted for such purpose. SECTION 1103.03 City Forester:',,-. The position of City i8rester ' is hereby created and powers and duties of such office are hereby conferred up City Forester by the' -City Council of -Sunfish -Lake, Minne Such powers and duties of the City Forester shali,.be des from time to time by the Mavor with the concurrence of t Council. It is the duty of the City Forester to coordinate,. direction and control of the City Council, all activitie City related to the 'control and prevention of tree disea insect infestation, and the potential danger posed by si weakened or dead standing tree material, from any cause; in the vicinity of common property boundaries or -travel" termines within to g in -the ees. fare of ithin estation raous nfesta- eakage) ituated anes, in the and n the sease ngus ion of disease r posed alling anes., the n the ota. gnated e City .nder the ; of the ;e or -nificant, situated anes.- pursuant -to the provisions of'Chapter'429 of Minnesota Statutes, and said assessments certified to the County Auditor as provided by law. SECTION 1103.08 Interference Prohibited: It is unlawful for any person to prevent, delay or interfere ,:with' -the City Forester or his agents while they are engaged in the performance of duties imposed by this Ordinance. Section 1103.09 Penalties: -Any,..person, firm or corporation violating the provisions -of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon convic- tion thereof, shall be punished by a fine, or imprisonment or both, -but in .,either case including the costs -of prosecution thereof.'r Each seven (7) day, period, or any part thereof, following the original time limit given to abate any nuisance .pursuant to Section 1103.07, during which any person, firm or corporation -allows a diseased, insect infefted, or otherwise hazardous tree (that has been marked as such during the annual survey) to remain on his property, shall.c'onstitute a -separate violation hereunder. SECTION 1103.10 Severability: A If any section, paragraph, clause or provision of this Ordinance shall be declared by court of competent jurisdiction to be*invalid, such decision shall- not affect the validity of this. Ordinance as a whole or any other part thereof. SECTION 1103.11 Limitation on Power of City Forester: - -Notwithstanding anything to' the contrary contained in this Ordinance,- the City Forester shall not be required or authorized to inspect or directzthe removal of uninfected major dead, or- , otherwise herwise weakened, standing tree material located along.property boundaries or.private travel lanes provided,,'however, that the Council may by resolution authorize the City Forester to make such inspections or removal. V/ CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 25, 1 TO: Mayor, City Council and City �or FROM: Klayton H. Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Watermains, Storm Sewer & Streets Executive Drive Job No. 8904 Improvement No. 89, Project No. 2 Bids were received and opened on April 26th for the construction of Executive Drive. As shown on the attached resolution, HRS Constru tion was the low bidder with the bid amount of $69,287.40. The engineer's stimate was $90,000. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council award the bid to HRS Construction. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 89-_, RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAINS, STORM SEWER AND CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE LOTS 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 7, BLOCK 4, AND LOTS 1 A BLOCK 5, MENDOTA HEIGHTS INDUSTRIAL PARK (EXECUTIVE DRIVE, IMPROVE 89, PROJECT NO. 2) should BIDS AND 2, T NO. ! City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTI OF WATERMAINS, STORM SEWER AND STREET CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE LOTS 39 4, 51 6 AND 7, BLOCK 4, AND LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 5, MENDOTA HEIGHTS INDUSTRIAL PARK (EXECUTIVE DRIVE, IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO.2) WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the proposed cor of storm sewer, water and street, curb and gutter improvements to 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, Block 4, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 5, Mendota Heigt Industrial Park (Executive Drive) (which improvements have heretofc known and designated as Improvement No. 89, Project No. 2), bids wE ceived, opened and tabulated according to law and the following bii received complying with said advertisement: NAME OF BIDDER AMOUNT OF BID HRS Construction $69,287.40 Forest Lake, MN F.F. Jedlicki, Inc. $75,008.00 Eden Prairie, MN Ro-So Contracting, Inc. $77,148.70 Centerville, MN Danner, Inc. $81,758.50 Inver Grove Heights, MN F.M. Frattalone Excavating, Inc. $97,074.20 St. Paul, MN and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has recommended that HRS Construction o.- Forest :Forest Lake, Minnesota, be declared the lowest responsible bidder. truction rve Lots e been e re - were NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the Cit of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the bids for the project are hereby received and ac- cepted. 2. That HRS Construction of Forest Lake, Minnesota, is hereby declared to be the lowest responsible bidder. 3. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver any and all contracts and doc ments necessary to consummate the awarding of the bid for the above described improvements to HRS Construction of Forest La Minnesota. n 4. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, exce that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowes bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this day of May, 1989• ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and CiA/)Istrator I FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT:, I.O.S. Planned Unit Development and Building Permit Case No. 89-17 nTQrTTQQTnM - April 25, 11 In November 1986 the City approved a planned unit development (PUD) to allow for a second phase of I.O.S. office construction (see attached dravings). Now I.O.S. has submitted a request for a building permit with some minor changes to the original PUD plan. Section 19.10(1) of the City's Zoning Ordinance allows the Council to approve minor changes in a Ifanned unit development for the location, siting and height of a building from an approved plan. Changes to the original plan are as follows: 1. Change from a three story to a two story building (ma structure height). 2. Slightly larger building footprint. 3. Addition of a skyway to connect the two buildings. existing 4. It appears that the ordinance limits individual sign sizs to 50 square feet within a B -1A district. The proposed I.O.S. sign that is to be located on the south building wall facing Mendo a Heights Road is 72 square feet. I 5. Council had approved five foot front and side yard setba k vari- ances with the original plan and this plan fits within t ose previously granted variances. RECOMMENDATION: Staff, feels that the changes presented are minor in nature mends that Council approve them and authorize staff to issue a permit. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation they pass a motion approving the changes listed above to the planned ur velopment and pass a motion authorizing staff to issue the buildir. (Note: A park contribution of $3,906 remains to be paid and will I lected with the building permit per previous agreement. recom- should it de - .7 permiT,. a col— 0�4 ilN I 2 avow- - &A"" 5L.06 KV IVA, -V Z IA— Mery 11 -1 ]-,I, It 1-4 FUTURE OFFICE BUILDING THREESTORY .2,92508F 2 9 A /06-6 i #.Af r, lerr=cavR s;.-6 - 4 f 8. a s II -9 96 Xi @ S� N v **Nor _ ., � • � _ ill I �.I � � ►: 57 115-111 1�;A Z Case No. 4 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1 • -4 DAKOTA COUNTYo MINNESOTA 4 APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION,., Cow OF 1 PLANNING REQUEST k',", 3 Type of Request: Revision of Rla P I Number & Street ..,,., City ,.lzi -j;.tj, StateZip tz. i • _P JN."; Telephone Number: Day Time 936-9518 kj1!4 At of Application 54. Conditional Use"Permit for P.U.D, Aj ,Date. Fee Paid Applicant Name: Heights Investment Henry Flock, Managing -Partner 4 4 Name: Hagen Raymondli' We tlands.- Permit) 'W!*.;.,q St, Last First .Initial Heights,* MN 5 120 . .... Number & Street City State T ,A) it IN. :.'Address: 2101 Girard Avenue 'South Minneapolis r 4 . 55405 Type of Request: Revision of Rla P I Number & Street ..,,., City ,.lzi -j;.tj, StateZip tz. i • x Variance Telephone Number: Day Time 936-9518 kj1!4 54. Conditional Use"Permit for P.U.D, Aj Owner Subdivision Approval ;tI.;. Name: Heights Investment Henry Flock, Managing -Partner LastFirst Initial We tlands.- Permit) 'W!*.;.,q St, E X 0 ther Address: 1031 Mendota HeightsRoad Mendota Heights,* MN 5 120 . .... Number & Street City State ,,Ziprvl-R, tedunit'develonme t Street Location of Property in Question: 1031 Mendota _Heights Road r Legal Description of Pro erty: p T F- 14 IOS Plaza Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, Mendota Heights'.' MN 55120 .10 Type of Request: Revision of Rla P I A ezon .';V, x Variance Conditional, Use, Permit 54. Conditional Use"Permit for P.U.D, Aj Minor, Conditionals Use Permit - Subdivision Approval ;tI.;. Plan Approval We tlands.- Permit) 'W!*.;.,q St, E X 0 ther tedunit'develonme t A 54. Aj E M t y 6-1, "i", ":''Applicable City Ordinance Number Section Hi Present Zoning of Property:, I i BIA1`4Fl`;":'-` all 'P Present Use of Property: Undeveloped Proposed Zoning of Property: Same as*hbov Proposed Use of Property: Office building of people intended to, live .or W*ork.:on' premises'. 200 tift dr h e that *"all statements' niMe';in this request and on the a tiona I hereby declare d VA - material are true. 7 " nature bf Applicantlj J.t: %lij.j 4' %J_ by Received . ;'I% ; ; ", i ti4 i NOTE: The following plans shall be drawn and attached to this appli:ation: A. Applications involving a Variance shall'submit .the following plans Date Received* Ini tia L., oq -N , 1. Site Development Plan 4 2. -Dimension Plan 3. Landscape Plan 4. Grading Plan B. Applications involving a Rezoning,7Conditional Use Permit or Su divis'ion'"W V. shall submit the following: }z+,3'05'' W'. 1 Sketch Plan* 71 Abstractors Ce t1if ii -ate! 2. r ,—c , o (If the subdivision involves cutting of, existing parcel into twor.,more C. Applications involving a.Wetlands Perm 8 t Lng: it"shallubmi 'the 'follow j, fly A full & adequate description of all phases'.of the operatiohs&/o- proposed ."t ;,,physical, changes.,,..:,.,.., 2,.,�,A topographic map.of the area.'i--Coritour,intervals ','shall be'drawn at" two, (2) 4• 'foot intervals at; horizontalt,scaleI;ofT' 1,000 *.or larger..!, lj� ';; 6 1 A�, li� I , V 1 It Y !,11f+3., ,Adetailed site plan of the proposal!',showing proposed.drainage, grailin& an scap tt 4- A site design map showing the-locationof'existifigC features,, future man-made eatures,,,n:,,, within the site and to a distance of- five hundred ,,(500) feet surrounding .AhOsite*.' International Office Systems, 1031 Mendota Heights Road Mendota Heights, MN 55120 0Tel: (612) 456-9999 " FAX 454-9718 April 14, 1989 City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Inc, RE: Revision to IDS Plaza addition planned unit development for Heights Investments Gentlemen: International Office Systems, Inc. provides sales and service of bu machines and telephone systems. The existing corporate headquarter is located at 1031 Mendota Heights Road. This two story structure square feet was completed the fall of 1986. mess building 50,827 A planned unit development for a three story office building of 29,50 square feet was submitted to be approved by the City in September of 1986. At this time, the project has not been constructed. IDS would like to revise the previous submittal. They feel a two s building with slightly larger "footprint" will be more marketable a offer more flexibility for future expansion. The new program is a office building of approximately 27,000 square feet. This structur match the existing building height and exterior appearance. A new skyway will link the two buildings. Parking provided for each site meets existing zoning requirements. refer to the following breakdown of useable area and parking ratios Parking Ratio (useage area) Office 1 space per 150 square feet Warehouse/storage 1 space per 2,000 square feet IDS headquarters parking required: Office 29,450 sq. ft /150 sq. ft./spa. = 196 Warehouse 9,835 sq. ft./2,000 sq, ft./spa. = 5 Sub Total = 21 Proposed office building parking required: Office 20,700 sq. ft./150 sq. ft./spa. = 138 Total parking required = 339 spaces Total parking provided = 399 spaces "Number One in Office Automation" ory d will rwo story s will enclosed Please International Office Jos. City of Mendota Heights April 14, 1989 Page 2 Inc. For your consideration, a number of variances are requested: 1. Encroachment of 21-31 at 100' building set back along Inlerstate 35E frontage. 2. Encroachment of south entrance -canopy along Mendota Heigits Road frontage. 3. Zero setback variance for construction of skyway link. 4. Mountine of 6' high sign letters to reap "IOS" on south uilding wall fronting on Mendota Heights Road. With the City's approval, we anticipate starting construction in lat spring of 1989. Yours truly, Henry L. Flock Managing Partner Heights Investments HLF/jc CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 25, 1 TO: Mayor, City Council and Cit �o�—rator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Directof SUBJECT: Bjorkland Wetlands Permit Case No. 89-11 DISCUSSION: At their April meeting the Planning Commission considered an a plica- tion for a wetlands permit from Mr. Dick Bjorkland, Jr., 2324 Field tone Drive to allow the construction of a new pool in his back yard. Du ing the discussion a question was asked about whether the pool could be drained into the pond. There are no City ordinances that prevent it, however it is a federally protected pond so I called the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to see if they would allow it. The person who is the expert on protecting ponds is off for a few days, one of his co-workers informed me that we would need to talk to him directly to get any stipulations however, in general pool water is allowed to be drained into ponds. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approva of granting the requested wetlands permit. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they hould pass a motion approving a wetlands permit for 2324 Fieldstone Drive to allow the construction of a swimming pool within 75 feet of a wetlands. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: JAMES E. DANIELSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR KEVIN D. BATCHELDER, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT SUBJECT: Bjorklund Wetlands Permit Case No. 89-11 DATE: April 18,.1989 DISCUSSION Mr. Dick Bjorklund, Jr., 2324 Fieldstone Drive, owns a home along a pond within the Copperfield II development. His he is constructed greater than 100 feet from the pond, however he proposes to construct a new pool within 75 feet of the pond. He therefore needs a wetlands permit. ACTION REQUIRED Planning Commission needs to consider exempting the applica t from a public hearing, review the proposal with the applicant, and make a recommendation to the City Council. ^ ^ PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER; 'APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: ` PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 25 April 1989 B9 -Il - Dick B'urklund Southeast of the Intersection of Powdvia and Fieldstone Row Approval of Wetlands l. The B' rkbmnd hmrno occupies a 105 foot wide lot (measured the street line) on the northwest side of the pond, olrnomL opposite the extension of Pondviow Drive as it intersects with Fieldstone Road. 2, The house is located 137 feet from the pond, to which the wettand ordinance requires a nominal 100 foot setback to any structure. Mr. Bjorklund proposes to build a new swimming pool in his back yard to be located as shown on the attached site plan. The distance from the edge of the pool to the water line is proposed to be 82 feet. Also, the swimming pool is to be 35 feet from the existing house. Mr. Bjorklund notes that this is a reasonable and desirable distande since there is a 14 foot deck extending from -the house toward the p)ol site. The proposed swimming pool is to be 20 feet by 40 feet. 3. No topographical information was submitted, though Mr. D nielson, Director of Public Works, informs un that he has requested such a drawing from Mr. B'orklund. Hopefully, this will be available Lo members of the Planning Commission and Council prior to the mailing of this report. 4. Mr. B^orklund has informed us, at a recent meeting at City H It, that the level of the pond is 8 feet below the basement y]oo Danielson does not anticipate a problem with respect to the C except that the impact of the required lOO foot setback differs depending upon the amount of grade differential from the structure proposed to the pond level. | 5, In summary, it appears that the proposal has a degree rnedL Technically the swimming pool in e "structure" to which the LOO foot standard is applicable. Being below ground level, however, L e visual impact on the shoreline area in minimal. | 1 is •� :ilk I oz 0 nm aco i, .j = n � � 1 *L C. S. A. H. 63 DELAWARE ------ �— AV E NU r e - �- i � irr��r�.�rrr•ar I/3 r G ? co� 3so Vo SUBJECT PR PERTY cc,(, NORTH SCALE 1#1 20 1 14 P ON 10 7 4 J, 4. rs, -, \v AD 7 6 1� I tl� 4 1-c 10ii 0 12 •9 IiA/2 00�c 56 Of PARK IN D 56 47 2�l 77 105 4 _1 -T 1_1. 10 0" 95 C. 4 10 4 ZZ, - 12 \5 4, 4 6, 1z,4 393 5 1 5-' 9,9". 4,; 31, It, irT AT E S 151.4,11 E S 2 11 FOR DEVAI- z RE- 151.93 1b 37 4 HAGSTROFA KING PARK cy 166.74 for t 3 6 73.0 .07, 1 a. 53 110,21 GS 1 R04, 79 1 24 ii ISO. Sri 71.96 1 5 '89 21 2.44 170 159 23 104 •Z.,096 10 tag V.. 576 64 11 .3c r f. BOUT LCT 6 .76 64 4 40 7.1,11 1550 Ji No., • '3!s t i7 t4 j•: t; ;4,DAKOTA COUNTY,CITY,OF MENDOTA-'HEIGHTS l. 4,44:1 ,,MINNESOTA girl M7 APPLICATION FOR,ICONSIDERATION..I.., A ic Ar"i-I r J, PLANNING -REQUEST:1ii, VIV . :_q - , 4 fl, . , .1 , 114 f _ 1, Vi.,fit at 00" Ai Date of"APD1 ic ion'T M'. zg. Paidl/M 3 J i1pit"41. ".44, Applicant: ica tA 1. i 4 . I$, Name 8 —Initial Fist' I Las t 1% "k Address: ifi�City Z i p umber A.Street W. a on I'T 1 h Number: lei� 4tili.0-11 A 01 OwnerV.'!',: i".. 0(". 11 !Ai' Name: K(V.A,.b 1".v, Last Fir a t; ;% Initial V Address: r i STONt, 'Num -I ber & Street 'City .State Street-Location of Property in Question:,*; A, 34,( 1b '4 Sz ITE t PIMP 5, il',. Legal Description of Property:* W'S i•R,0 ',Ito (X3 C V, 1 f pm I Ott, tr J1% •t, 1. W I V1 n ng 5 est. 0 - *,Re i . I T pe,oftRequ Y Vazo I Conditional-Use Permit k" Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. l Minor.Conditional.Use Permit' Subdivision 'Approval' '�{:' � ':'''•k.r: �, #��� ' `�'i;i' •R'f,,r� �!{, ;Frr{. , ,i';''`i' !,i x..'? ` j•f, t ,1 t�('' i t • rt,!� • ,i�# ',.' -6 4. 14 fmi: Appro I il Plan va ids:'.Permit ",`.Wetlar Other 1i ;V"m . o J 'A' ,M, jilt t - J.. I ., : .� �6 t A $ VV "Alt, � Aim'. Fill . JS J..'4."J" It .APRIL 10, 1989 TO: MENDS HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL RE: WETLANDS PERMIT 2324 FIELD STONE nPIVE THE PURPOSE OF THIS LETTER IS TQ INFC RI YOU THmT WE HAVE DISCUSSED OUR PLANS FOR A SACVVYRD, UNDEPOROUND POOL AND FENCING WITH OUR =f=•':' E_!'• NEIGHB9PT. THEIR SIGNATURE N4 THil =-;-ER TNN&JrvTES THPT THEY ARE AGREEABLE TO OUR PLA1,1S. C CATHY AND MICHAEL GANNON 1-14-11CY AND DW, :Li AH THE IMMEDIATE LOT TO OUR WEST IS OWNED BY BJCRKLUHD C04STRUCTION. THANK YOU! DICK A"D JOmN 8JORKLUNI, 454-5587 I F30. 00 Z r -L Lo•T 5 BLOCK 'I- - I Lo 6LOC K '�'CK g70 7[ CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 25, 19 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Qs)—rator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Nides - Variance Case No. 89-16 DISCUSSION: At their April meeting the Planning Commission considered an tion from Mr. and Mrs. Nides, 2894 Patricia Street for a 6 foot r setback variance (see attached staff memos)• RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approv request. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the Planning Commission recom they should pass a motion approving a 6 foot rear yard setback var 2094 Patricia Street. I.Lica- yard of the dation ce for CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Nides - Variance Case No. 89-16 April 18, 11989 Kevin Batchelder Paul R. Berg Administrative Asst. Code Enforce ent Off. Mr. and Mrs. Nides, 2094 Patricia Street desire to add a maste bedroom to their home. They have submitted a letter explaining their reque t and signatures of consent from their affected neighbors. ACTION REQUIRED: Review the request with the applicants and make a recommendati n to the City Council on their request for a 6 foot rear yard setback varian e. , . PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING Street, Curley l. in Curley's Valley View Addition. The lots are originally platteld at 85 feet, thus, this lot has a lot frontage of 95 feet. in Curlav"o Valley View Addition were platted quite shallow at 12 t in depth. The house iu located on the site at an angle so that the northeast corner of the house is approximately 36 feet from the rear lot line (east side of the lot). 2. The Nides propose to build a 12 foot addition along the rea of the existing house. If the addition is done in this fashion, a :riangular portion of the new addition will extend approximately 6 feet into the required 30 foot rear yard. Thus, a variance to the rear yard setback is required if the addition is to be constructed as proposed. J. Attached is a letter from the Nides indicating cna/r proposal and the msauunu for their request for the variance. Also attached is a copy of u statement from three of *their neighbors indicating their approval. The approving neighbors have properties contiguous to the Nides on either side- on Patricia Street and abutting their rear yard (fronting on Theresa Street). 4. The Nides have r'e'viewed their, proposal with the Staff and p4inted out their principle objective of adding a master bedroom and ma ter bath. You will note from examining the floor plan that it appears that the addition on the northeast side of the house is the only ppropriate location to make it work well. The extension of the new allway to the new addition creates the need to extend the house furth r to the north, t . hus, enlarging that bedroom. The resulting four bedr om house with two baths at the bedroom level is quite attractive. 5. Obvioualy, the extension of the triangular c of the hous into the 30 foot required setback is less severe since the full width of the house is not so extended (into the 30 foot setback). Th southeast portion of the rear yard has a depth substantially greater than the required 30 foot rninlnnurn. Thus, it would appear that this roposal is a reasonable expansion under the circumstances. J u�iN ` • ' J MENDOTA SCHOOL EL MENTARY ER CIR. • ` ♦ • • V • IPU UCI V WEST CIRCLE ujC• ' ' `T • C VERONICA LA1 ' ( ! ~� Q . • i • ' civic CENTER i �. • 2 SITE ic RIA CT GE R o AA © Q _ r� _Lu Z N7 � w M R ADEM j Ecr ` z w o .-.. CENTREP INTE DRIVE Q) XTH MB �.; SUBJECT PROPERTY LLJ i• f '; • - f ' - - --� - I . - NORTH SCALE x„`400' q - - To 1 aM f ,: r O N � I I I -- I / -- -- /1/0, V7- -- -- - / saev,cE eon.o I I Q I �c Soo / V 4 O .�f/tet o V h O 1 /go ... J .. .. .. Lf c/.S� f 2 /[4. s .040-50 iIAeY A0 LE 4 AVE•C .0 050-50 I 2+ JOSEPH S c r_� ' Z3 3 S 060-50 I ° 3 7` /gc !z {- ` Locii.s B -9,7,7 N I / 3 Sao/c/`a/ 4 .070-50 _ zl s t !s sir o b /7 / .1 9 080-50 7-402-F I 19 17 I z I 72 SUBJECT PROPERTY vAN EECKH ur I i 090 50 `7Z-,A Q i 3 NORTH '2," %. ' SCALE 1"-200' Ar tErFtIGAN Ri= ,ar6ty u. tiTowN HALL. MEErl , % 070-51IT INC. % i- � � � � � gJ AG • e �ie9`s�.o�.. 1, Q 13 ,o 1 M a X 10Iffla o � c •z•ri,'2s' 1 ' !2 62 14. e CUZLEYz �. r I3o 7 o ` 9i, oo/ � �l3 vTGrI yl_ I. t• , P CN? fj 6q•�''/'• ,00 o 7-10 % Ir/?• , yJ o• 9 .� A/bar f 6 iYlabe'/ ' I + _ ,�°�• v 010-51co .s° 1 -4 Z! 4 I `,a 020- /3 ,� o i (L ��-1- - Z3 - �m� 1 EL.LEry 030-51 `~ , '�a�• THoMPsort ' ' ___ I 219.2 I t �P: ZGo7Z ' \ J B F- G r«'k It ji"; tjb; A. 1"n, N 0 IL IN -f TA" f I -Y CITY 'OF'MENDO HEIGHTS!: M INNESOTA: V -DAKOTA COUNTY;, APiLiCATION ;FOR. A & Ile f J N 4 PLANNING 'REQUEST! j til ..'• , I.,"'AC.0 11, X 1,�e J. 1A V. rIfj,!,0j 14 4 Date, of Application t, Fe,e. Paid 56 / L I, P 'fp.air •J ',,'Hama: OVA/ Last Firs t;,:;,j,, Initial Address:'a0C)4j PAj-?_ ic 1 CAJ D 67-A AA N. Number, Stre State Zip et,,, A r .ro jt [ice;Telephone Number It P a A415 Name 14 oo V C -!i: Last First Initial 'Address: SA A-1 (5 t /4 i Fumber & Street City State .'j ,Street'Location of Property in Question: :',Legal Description of Property: V /it L L V_ V Variance T; Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D Minor. Permit Subdivision Approval Plan Approval i e";,y -.Wetlands Permit Other, Type of Request: vi :V It'T .1. bl. 5 't , , - I "'.. . . " f . M Zip Rezoning Variance T; Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D Minor. Permit Subdivision Approval Plan Approval i e";,y -.Wetlands Permit Other, Zip 4 A rl April 10, 1989 Planning Commission Mendota Heights Gentlemen: We are asking for a variance to the back yard setback in the addition to our from 30 ft. required to 24 ft. The request for the variance is to prevent a hardship if the variance is not gran For the following reasons, we request the variance: house J 1. The configuration of the lot and the site of the existing home is such t at the front of the house is not parallel to the street. This creates a problemI ith the proposed addition. 2. If the new master bedroom location was moved to any other part of tie new addition, it would not be in the vicinity of my children's bedrooms. Since the oldest child is only 4 years old, this requires our bedroom to be next to theirs. 3. Because I am pregnant and expect a newborn any day, we requjred an additional bedroom and more family area. 4. Enclosed is a letter in the form of a petition by our adjacent ne supporting the above said variance. Yours very truly, Linda Nides 2094 Patricia St. Mendota Heights, MN Ighbors 14 4(ffe -=5�Y/-/ �(Je - �4 F�iyn "Jer.19 77X(9Del -7We- AL ale 1�;!Sk NOllo,IL C / C:; / C. (/7 11 1 / 1 13 U., () f --__,'- '-' ' -------''- � 4 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 26, To: Mayor, City Council and Citator From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistan Subject: Posthumus Variance Case 89-14 DISCUSSION L989 Mr. Bruce Posthumus appeared before the Planning Commission at their April meeting to request a 10 foot variance to the front yard setback for a proposed garage (see attached staff memos). Commissioner Anderson queried Mr. Posthumus about the slope down from Fremont, on which the garage fronts. Mr. Posthumus stated that the garage is elevated and will have a floo drain to address that problem. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend waiving the Conditional Use Permit and its public hearing requirements and approving a ten foot (101) front yard setback variance. ACTION REQUESTED If Council desires to implement the Planning recommendation they should pass a motion to waive the Use Permit and its public hearing requirements and ap foot (101) front yard setback variance. Commission onditional Wove a ten CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: JAMES E. DANIELSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR KEVIN D. BATCHELDER, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT SUBJECT: 'Posthumus Variance Case 89-14 DATE: April 18, 1989 DISCUSSION• Mr. Bruce Posthumus, 540 Annapolis, has requested a front yard setback variance to construct a detached garage on his through lot. City Ordinance 4.5(5) requires that all accessory structures on through lots be processed as Conditional Use Permits (CUP). CUPs are very expensive to process and require.a public hearing. Several years ago the City waived a CUP and hearing, and granted a variance to the Mancuso's (one of Posthumus' neighbors) for a similar application. The City is presently amending the ordinan e to allow these types of applications to be processed as variances. When Mr. Posthumus was in to see Howard Dahlgren, he had�his garage farther forward, however he has moved it back to e 20 feet from the property line, as requested, to allow room for vehicles to be parked in his driveway. This will avoid having vehicles park in the City right of way. ACTION REQUIRED: Review the proposal with the applicant and make a recommendation to the Council on waiving the CUP and i public hearing and approving a 10' front yard setback variance. , ` ` PLANNING REPORT DATE: ~~~ CASE NUMBER; APPLICANT: LOCATION: . ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 25 April 1989 Bruce Posthumus Between Annapolis 5 treet and Fremont Street (»aa fkaLoh) Approval of Vari noe to Garage Location | l. The property in question is 80 feet by 120 feet in depth, with double frontage on Annapolis Street and Fremont Street. Double frobtage lots normally require a conditional use permit for the construction of an accessory building on the site. The City, however, is in the process of changing the Ordinance to allow such development to be processed as a variance. Recently, this variance process was used to consider a similar accessory structure for Tony Mancuso at 552 Annapolis. Thus, this application is being processed as a variance rather than the previously required conditional use permit. 2. Mr. PooLhurnuo proposes to construct a 30 foot by 33 foot -4 irch garage along side his house which is constructed on the southwest qyadrant of the two 40 foot lots that he owns. Attached is a copy of a survey indicating the location of the existing house and the proposed garage. 3, A few weeks ago, Mr. Posthumus reviewed his' developmen proposal with City Staff at which time he had proposed to construct dhe garage only 9 feet from the Fremont Street right-of-way. We sugg-3sted that it would be important to set the garage back at least 20 feet, if possible, to provide adequate space for him to park vehicIE!s in the driveway without being out on the public right-of-way. Thelrefore, he changed his proposal to indicate the proposed 20 foot setb ck. The setback normally required is 30 feet. I 4. Mr. Posthumus proposes to set the garage back 20 feet because the grade of the lot slopes downward on the north side and a 30 foot setback, as required, would bring the garage foundation a considerable distance above the grade. You will note on the elevations of the proposed structure, as submitted by the applicant, that this grade would be approximately 2 feet, if the structure is located as proposId. 5, � You will note that the existing house is setback north right-of-way of Fremont Street. It would be helpful, in this case, if members of the Planning Commission and Council would view the property in question and the contiguous area. Many structures in the area are located in a nonconforming manner with less than the required setbacks. | ~ Bruce Posthumus, Case No. 09-14 E 6. In the past, the City has considered many variances to garage se backs. There has been a persistent policy to attempt to get at least 0 feet of garage setback from a frontage street to allow enough space o park a car without the bumper extending into a public right-of-way. The question is whether or not the placement of the structure, 20 fe t back rather than 30 feet, is reasonable in view of the grade of t e site. Unfortunately, the applicant did not indicate the topography of t e land so as to ascertain this condition on the site plan. 7. The garage is located S feet from ' the side lot line, w accordance with the ordinance requirements. is in 41*'F'4 u 6u 6 4 6U MZa r. U. I r. i O,z �sr 2 C 40 -1 Ac zo, 128 c 24 -ZZ Z su &S 7S3 SO Ile roti c I.T. 40 10 F'� L' E 110 NT sr. 3 81 c.,401 * I - 1 -40 It 11. 'o I SUBJECT PROPERTY 13 /11 Lart .S #I T NORTH t , 1.0 SCAE 111=200' �f zlys N, 7 L -'3 74 Af 1-3 4 HIAWATHA ST 114 13 /Z It 10 9 $j 7 Z 5 4 V 404- 01 24a --vo- 7 to f, z 3 2 7 .10 0 545 Zi -0 to to 71 I A ST. 0 R A 10RISN" c, S7 KADENEN C. Cc z L4 Zccst-d r3 J 2. A Z1-1 Zr QS 0 /0 /4 70 &a Sx•13 CC 10 -T F-ERRN4- ADD IP 11�-'1 57- 15 1+ 13 4bf 13 41 70 40431 170 80 207.25 a w so f4o fia z 3 it 4 5 .4 ri L 4rr - N 6j Li \44 4 13 S TO W Cp v so 77FIT 7 LI I -It 71 10 14� lot 4wjL% d 904 to 8of Fo 94 204 I LAWSON 5 T. rN 3 4 5 'S} li;4f# i`tif• •t "' y'�}�1•i a �' i'S; i},ft, y i.', ', ^(i.',r, ' .. '*' • 1 t.it i',• .. � *, ." . .i �y'4tf IiC '= t�;R ,,}t, y':• `t' ,' '.(':+ 5,+��,,i•:, .lift'}•.�J'4,'f'��}i. 3r •',t t'!`:<'t•i ,' t '-a it t'',,�`�}"'1"=''.y,;.�'•}' t t: ti"i •I F :t ,,:::Yj y ;+Carie No. •wl•: t1 t, 11" i 'i f^` .i' ".l 'i:'.,.i 115.l.'t•d { ��i,•%J' t' ,, •;`•"'(a%r', l . 22.• �' i t� �' R.al'j �t' � K Sf�'•4i::' i •t t�'e ji'�'.'f�• rt• 4:. �,. tt'i •f:tl?'�i� '{. 1� f �' �lti{�.� -y t 1lsl •iyf '• •i• 'iii�{N�, ir. •�,;•.4 ,!'•4 Sbr �t`•!- tt., ,' •4,. �,.• 3: ':• t''i= :Y} � 4"• �;' ! i '•.y •< ii +• '}•; { t •�r f,tty'`; it +i''' . "'n fnj4 li 1 xj'ii l } ; i » i• 1. 4;; i:'y �� Jlfr€ ,,�tf} ,CITY- OF •MENDOTAl.:HEIGHTS;' '; ',;.,i+:�; '�' ': 1';!•".II tt I:�ti` �7 i;.t,r {.•9,.i,,, ' ;!','},i:':`i .,ri,`..tt.'i"! DAxOTA,COUNTY;,IMINNESOTA t.. �� .'";, .i,,. t:;j ! :c�i r},s,.Sk;.� .k • at:' >,t �•�a: •Frnri ' i. -' fis..,"�J !�; �"r�,}i;rs'.1 �1''' y�'t'f � ?•.t�; }ai, l,t i •} t { • S'';t;. �,•,��s :.t •} ! .::i�,"t';:fit . I{ , j • S t i r i� I•♦ ,�,�;+_.,'. ykt, , h,.':q�h�7,rx1F,, t��`�� tti�,s'�`•• � .�.}�. 4r; f T»"'l !� 1" li:,� •i ' .'� !: f ' �t ,��`•• ,yy ;'t'�«, j, i :•i � ,:(' �}� 1 +i e{ .�,!. ��"; 1Y�r' 1. f` �. ljita..o C:�iG;:s�::,..-,• i, i i� ;, i} �:',o t iJ `.{ f! .f `, t'r a+. s? ; i'�,�tt. t � '"I'3 y ��`� 7 P' try }} t• ;• ;t , }- „�'• `• t i i. .. t° fl�4,;:�.4i •,s ; : f:`,' �+i' i 'ii r APPLICATION iFOR?, ; �. ' �'�t=Jt,i f..,.i CONSIDERATION; I 1. is i t v� .� �j' a'r•.t' r i'', ° `,' ft' t.''.i i•i't •"y .: �f,`;.. �'°: •, .,�.� it,';. ttt y' 1 ! 4! �''1 +t ;� ' s ,ii:i»t;S!(!f�»l:! ��i�tj l�i�� i ; ♦ - 4 � .:�,••• f I..�)li+�tr;+-'.! . }� i'% ,r ill•,j,. i": , • . s '� � ' .J 1� , " t,t, 1 J.�i: t:,, ,,.,,,r• `j� i ynf. } 'l4.t.,�.;«, f, • t •+t'' •,i,h •'f:',,;'":. + f,• i i ;;� ft ;L._,(. ,k"•�'i.; 1.}r':',:j l„c; :i11:;E :Ffi; t`'.d��' �, r`� v,,;,, .,I,,;,l'f !t�, (�.�•PLANNiNG}REQUEST 7-���Ft�; ;, ., ;•. ,' i;i'•tt ,• ,';',.�;' ,t`',�i� ��:!•�', h V�""4•1"�`t, .i krFn:;i. ,iW i+t;. ,*w,.ifi;}}r N'' it. �'ty;a,�• y.r ..f: :, Yi:w:q f:.'Jy �f t..ti ti ' .ir i`'�'c ,. i ; r !l: ...- ,it.I 11 ` 1a tit ism i f'a,S'�,r4 , l,ij`e. `ifi''t. r'l.r,• atJ:;•7+•.,� '}, ,s' ffs:.., .� {'►;i'(��t�iY�,}F'�;r'hl•..!: t,.l(:fit ,�„t:y, t.:,Y'iil,;r-irt•.�:'.�;.,t'f;. i tl r• 8i'f�iSt�jft.� fart � {� ���' i :if i'�,'i�i�`' :+;?�i*:i •:.+ iiit@.� ,tt?a+,4 -,I �'`rp':•2N.�}r� tssi ,� �r tt'1 5 •��' i Date of Application ! ft ;,iJ�i4f�tj'1,,: tve. Paid .5°° ''it't• t73�`. f, ,.sips�rf'�,i;i , i •C' ' •; ir•� �j t, t •, '' t t E:"t.,'i }a4i��,i'�11i •} ,', YI'. 1 F4E, i �: 'l:' ft•i �ei � , �� �• 1 •;'t � >i• ;ia '!° t• : i�,+jr(. 1 11ty.,.�' ',.t'�'tit,'t ,i t•i4�•o;`r, - +. '.,,•,;,tt�) ;'�:' ,' ... t; Applicants : i , ''';r t,"'b';}'l�.,�',T'. ;:i -r'�'•:#, ! , :i�� ,• ii r.I,( , f '•,a,i=i 1.�=;i ..'f .irr.f+.l".:Z s�( t� i r1144 t 1 t?. ;.1:. ;..1 j S #:'' ! fr• ,,r, ji' i K • .(�} •R�'+yyv 4l`ameilA, _ r.s 1;'11'14 +'�") �.A+-IF,i 1�,,4• i• }..Ai, ,', i _ t ,i. i6s-�s`. i, .tc '.t':'llyyl ru f k i{�+Last c' ':. ;r ' +,'First'r4•; ;;r ii.:f.'.I Initial 1 i•' i `p-<t.rlwt.r- Yti.i: e: 1i,!•� �t , 1 "•;,'l t, i:. • t r '.t. .l. •,r "J K. itif'� :1 1 jig 3t� i'i• 1 }ir i jr I•i�f' i•rtt.�w ...�,+j: 4t•I! }Bf4. ;:i .4 1 rr }t /moi •' 1,.• i;'e.t, t • IAddress:' 7` :,} T cif rS^ v! /cc h`� ` X175 f �ji'ltiF'' Y�•• ' i :Alilt'l'L_� ,,i�fi�?+ ` i)}�jY,*�t "',t?' 11t'r'.1str.r, 'tt i'f�f71,. y,`+•,; ' :;� Street'� State Zip It i}i," City '}1q4Number&{ lia TelephonetNi �J' ;�, ,.;it�:t'lt4'�irr';•f�t�'' .ts. r�;. t!! `�{( rti, M4k'1ilft•'i: r '�j4 } } ,'.,'; � s,: ,.� i,'.,t,'•. t 1'; .i t t 4 ' i k t' t "„tt ty1t.-t iYr� j «'%te•i% t' i ,i �t it L'#il tii,i t.�l ;,.j•tf ,'Owner, 4i 4 {/, "Name: 57/ t t't "iif.' fife 4*••'ij Last °t FiraC„ Initial. } !";: �,^it, ^ '! '' -1 ts�j'� �,i7 `I 1 i .d ` '•i :ff.j 4 �'r,, . i' ,. i r r�.r �t i,Y �.Yt,�r�'.i'x tl 'iT' ',"t. P''• '4 r:(, , ' fit,:y ,+ 'f,r., t,a I ,i/l''C�/ p;}}t }'T; ?•i, t3ra f:,Addreaes lX c j I �;fi1'`�:''�;'�N�•'; Number & Streelf ,City •'i. State ;Zip �i"'F t it t s i r 'y 1 ,r i , ' i.l . , •' l..f: , + ' %�#=��i• "•i�t1,1:M�;ri•.a. t rS!„ :: ` °i, ' �i :,.�,:f's" ,. r , i , . ,t•.F.� i ,�f " t 41�t� 4 StreWl,ocation of Property'in Question•;;•! ` i•a{',t tf`t�tlt"' i ,i '�` 1 1+'� i ///{/4 t!. .� t � y /�.'�,{%�{tJ//J�/t f'rt //ty� 1 //t/i%': `'' s/1 /j L/^ ' /�•('/)��/y i' i•1 �w. t, `i i' = I .; !.:7j,�i�!•`•• ••�V '•f' K' 'f CC�``V if4�/f .. /7C `i ��.. J "" t`tii',r'•; ''n},sty 1 ,r, Lr ••�:•�:; �".t;yw�j S };r Leal' Description of Property: ":! 64i. i, 'E?,: #?,`:'tit?Ut�!'-•�+.'.� f it,::fi.. � ;j I ..il "; . 1=t,+'r'fl ! 'r � .Ys �r{ j 'i!� ••,i. 1 X,(�.''i+/� ys i;{ :i':f l r;,lr 4 „'' i :• � 1 •• �,., "i, •, ,�id �t t�., `!•�. ;i •'1'••; 'f :l �iiip3 yyv��} tsl"il �.�• ' rrl %t' 1 /�J} f1t"* i' f//+'•.�,/jf/'�J •'' {�/' ,O (' ', s :ti,�J,f' '•f t" ( /0 r / i \ ' ! ' V L/ +� l C..� t... .J , r �,..f, " rz 7 I •-� {(ip/• ale •'`}f's':•E.^ { ,•. • } ., •', i 1F!'�r'f itr�ll•"i•'t t iai 1'i •i y, .f Tit � •'q' � •R / ,,• (, ',i f t ri. , R',tr, i' ;�. tt1! i�•'+ '"'nj: t isf tlt,' .,!r• S i.•i•.1• !`y'�'r7:•.y,•. rii 9, .,4:'� �,F;i.=if��•�it F,��iir •.,li '>'��tj,•ri, I -' , r , yt .',' i>' ; 1 i}, " ''' i f' 'i �. i�C;ii ��:, ,fir.' ,+ir ti 4�i ,+ rr .»{4 ,(f4 �. ,,j. r }••,• ,, ,•• .. t .•' }..I iY�.i�•�,;•::ilt ,.fir. �4i �1���.�! i.�; p,a.:, ,; -,, '.l",,,.Y; �,•is�; ;s•t (;ft•- "� •r,fl •t' '.,i '".�4 t'� 1ai#`,( i>vl ' i �i, - � j' .! , "�' iff r � .�.: i.t., ., ' .. ' , f f', t `•'t 'i ti � 1•,))��rrll f1t 'f,' �':• ,;� t �+ ,'•itr I,i ,iG.i # , i r'(" i'!'•:r ! •r it + 1 %Ito �! f t t, '{�l f�,> n ': t' •! r. !i•.i.; ' '' - ,t N:I '1, i e'.�it,i:wf''.se j$ j4 "t 1, 111 'Sir 4ir! . ry}.. ';� u.4is".,14.r 1te .:i•ii • �; ` !" t r R. M Vo .?IY , ,.r.t :i. i .�;ilr f t: l..a•,.}t r Sii. ;' tr iTYPe ofr;Request: '. ,�,( lid 'kt. Rezoning•'; .,. ;''i ; ; i`�,11" `•.+ t , . .1 ., i iF: t4r't.1 l•i' ; '.it '4, 'MAI �, 'L�n:!�,��' wa., , ,..�. r. i. i A: :i,', it,ir : i...:� !*• i{ .1.. , tr... ; �1. r,• � �:kv�A"�.'r,ii.t a.��'' iZ r•+t ttuiii tt t�:t 1?1' �,i%ariance i{;;i% .i,• .K%t3',• .:,-i.: 'r i yi,t �t , r�t �• ii •' rj. w .. ' '1'„if'•�I ''��f �;;�14j,�jvf,• it1 yfr 1 �4 'i 1 •, tr,. •., •;' r.;s,l :ft .i,t:r a,. L' s, 7. Conditional Use Permit: , :s [ � � ,, ,y # r,.! i'A,sE;•;�r t�;' t �; i Conditiorial.Use Permit' for•IPrU+D• , �'•'t'•;y#1��:�•'• ►,'t;�Y�.'!' y, 't�ff.iy3'± 'lel:�•.. i.: s i} i!:• i'i':'+' ',iii':it t >d,'• ;'t� F, r! ! , Minori Conditional. Use Permit' ;� t'•;.� ,?�;i'��?,1;:, f:' j:4Subdivieion Approval `•i,•ti �.:�'+#, ,,'r �� I'f"•��c;t,,.j(''.rfi :''t'',Plan'Approval J t}l !• 1 �'i t '�!i',t .� t.!'';}�: t.,; ` ! 'i' : „ a+,i.:•+.Wetlands Permit1/'1ti t•a.• , r'# } ; i•; .•r , .. u'tu "k.,•..L�11 :+f; i r i i'`f;ij;' ,:,• „�;cOther:t:•-';��i;y:.,' "a, ,,t»;,J�,';i. i,.;i;;,r',� i 't.i i" L"iw�,Y.,tt ! . , t '}E,4 ' is.i.;'•4 .. f' I�; it '•4'�Td:i}4 1i '!)y'}t :i i, f, 1', t•il,t: ;`,�,, '! t��l. L+' t '.! �j }}�� ./•l _ ,,�,f•: t' t� /� }'KIIZC }4ry A 1:T. •(t t� ;, ,,f,. Yr rr' rap• t'�: �!'/''':�i::O':I, jf l7f' �Y+'`r'�!'t`+ Q';I f/`i/{i�fr i;{4 v.:i�i�'4i�;} tY+i I NEI �`•# y }; !♦n}: S f i t ,fie i ly:li i .:.4 i' :: f ' r :'; i Sx' j7►!' t+< ' t., 1{tp•.}�}1 (.}� { i t.. is : ' fO •` { t� i•�M. f�' + �•:t•�1�t:<r i • i t :'.fi;i .a 'Vr:{ '7 , :l.i{ 'i't ' .. ; .! . , i' t• . , , .+, •f 'I'�i. i �i i'',}4 !1♦) �fs i'�iiSI'',. ,6 i R lrtt�j ''' •E . i .t. "� ip ) ' r. S, • ,i. s ,I, p.r, cv :+} +{ •,f,'u'i;, jf j : r. •f. .: t•+ .i..' ��J�.1 , �t ��' i j. •. i } j;.zS: i,. .i`: .f' •�' _ f. : e•� t, ' E -ji � 1] g •} •f 'mit••";4.,i. i l•, 'F. r, •S , 'r.' •L:y .',t" ,Q 4. 4 I., !'+1�, •t,r;::ty jr' "r .-1��K4,t.tt., ,�.s i J;f •r�. f''r rr;''r `•;' ,:-�,., I�,�•,. .t• ,"ir.rjt^t�;;ti'rJ�r,•t� •6pgt` ,, •alit '; y¢ivrp�7e,r!liy;`4,1x'tt.r4 �. 11ii . } I,i 1 : t, , '•t'+•R'r .',i11}! ;i�,' i:t.5 4". 'i•[ i.r ', t'•• t' 't.: 2 ` �< }t, r ! w-� + 1'it j i.� "iii t �� i 2 n Y"Cf '! •�;i�' •i fi�^•7'^�,1' ,•yi.^.i, ,irii t;),i, ti, ..4t�,j; if ,i' :t' �7 Nti• t,t i;`',i f. �Ur� ( ri 1?"ti(�tj ,`y,(;•f ;..� i 1 #t r,��,r 7;.. :� 1 �.,,�4;!"•zj,,A.a'i.',.i:j:;l:Ijjt,f}�,= 4i, t-, ,:,t;.:�#-:`�' �. ••} , StJtit, �•:2aA!! #�;yt'ila ` :'i'i;�i•cii:"t iii+ i•: r{ „r:t: i «,••�' ,� 'i i.l n i�fRt 41}� !I' +' 1� I i• ' . C r.t. %7y f(.. ,' , '.�'„f., �. :;< 1: :;' ' f, .(, ., j•)`r � '�:�:t �4,� t lL�Ai,R•1 •�� 4 . • e� ,1,�• ,a� YS ' , , i f '•• #r [• h'' ir�. .a. i ` f 7 t'' • i '`r S4i^:` ' •'" fFFF- a. i#. M° ''t.IM !,;,}', +S'yj't.i "G��•rr•,.� tt'1 r #:,:* I 'i f /�p i•. ( i.�y .l.;;r�'7i ` � � l.t 'H r� ' � °t s s:.,'tib ' ;f:i:� f �r s yt•:.!•i,;"t i,1,lt tS �:,t,!�• fli- Tr,., �,;'i•# t ;.f jy'rf �,. �4: i ! I . :� .l,tr t +,`Jb t �•.'''�.i �.�'�4��!(• 'f�(tt,'t";�,i,,. ! , ..t! "., , sy t .., i!' .,d. r •ri ,, i14 Iif:;�,,i 'S"r�,..�<.,�tt�•Itt4:d.l:Yr ' ';k�;i�',z�, ;' Y»��1t'��J;�,ry ary.�lr:.l:4t s {'• !1 'It�i'I'°il+ �"�'�'�1t�'} �.�'li, :l1 'f •� + . ,,! I'' ^t .. :?tiaY''.7;•:+t'r AI• �:'t •J • �Ibl 2) C111- VYT I- k4 t7 W -�f?W75--o- IV.d—Z -4;pe�f P.J 4 W22 Y7 1 (77 P v � fir;! a ,r,' , �� +f.r. • � • • r • • * ; . .' r - tic 1, C-ct 11 proper + J it • •� • • • . s r ' • •+-- ,.'fig -. _ i ' '± , -r ft- r rt• w• ►' • • �� •�•• - - •jUR • r + • • • • t # • s r • , t t i t • • t • • LL • xe, •. �..� list • • • • • • • -3 • • ,�. UTLER NORTH ' • . '' < • PARK\Uit ' + •• / • r • • • f 6u • • • • ' /1. L. 7� 6u • / • • 77 s r- 3vm El L ARK ix r • .,_ •- _ ' • • sc.«x•t F4161, IC. T [lLx�Ul�- � • , ; � - • tJ r . e Certificate of *urbep PAUL R. McLAGAN & SON 731 Wkou An -c WEST ST. MAUL, MINN. MIX Minmw s Rcriumd land S—y— Hereby Certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. iurveyed For Bruce Posthumus PAUL J. McGINLEY, R.L.S. Date...March, 161 1989 ........_---._.._.._._._._..._....._. Scale.. 1 inch..--- 20 feet �Q%rQO� MINWISTRATION WY16099 Desaription Lots 9 and 10; Block 1, C.D. Piercers Addition to Saint Paul, according to the recorded plat thereof on file in the office of -.the County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota. ,4ampo/is St Ii•> [CWC celfgZ R� fremon/ 9f c Se146'/lo pipe 46IdO —•—Min bhk Fence -- P*Aef Farce 1 i I 1 17 .i T� �aw�o� aero all! A 0.8 - 09 A"/ 94 c • �z!5 i/1Q14:10 Anon CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 25, 19E TO: Mayor, City Council and Cit dR gator FROM: James Y. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Hanson Subdivision Case No. 89-10 nT9nTTSSTnN : At their April meeting the Planning Commission conducted a publ hearing to consider a requst from Mr. LeRoy Hanson to subdivide a to Junction Lane (see attached staff memos). Three lot owners along Wi Lane that abut the rear yard of the proposed lot were at the meeting objected to the proposal. They all felt that the new lot would be o context with the other Lametti Addition lots and that this proposal just "shoe horning" in another lot. The owner of Lot 13, Mrs. Barro present and she stated that her and her husband originally purchased form Mr. Hanson and did give him a quit claim deed for the land but was as a condition of their purchase from him and not because they to. She also discovered at the Planning Commission meeting that she been paying taxes on Mr. Hanson's piece of the lot since they trans to him many years ago because the split was never approved by the C' therefore was never filed with the County. The obvious solution to the problem is to have the Barrotts property and attach it to their property as back yard. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial request based on the existance of aesthetic problems and the large ances. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 89-_, RESOLUTION DENYING THl SION OF LOT 13, LAMETTI ADDITION NO. 2. .c on Ston and all t of ould be t was the lot that it anted had ered it ty and e the �f the ari- should DIVI- City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89 - RESOLUTION DENYING THE DIVISION OF LOT 13, LAMETTI ADDITION NO.1 WHEREAS, Mr. LeRoy Hanson, 530 Junction Lane, has applied for E division for the south 89.88 feet of Lot 13, Lametti Addition No. 2 lot division would then be combined with a portion of Lot 1, Block Kirchner Addition to form a buildable lot; and WHEREAS, this lot requires a 5,140 square foot area variance a foot front yard variance; and 6 lot and said , 1 20 WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted by the Mendota HeightsPlanning Commission on April 25, 1989 to consider the request and three (3) f the abutting neighbors objected to the request; and WHEREAS, because of the aesthetic reasons, the lot is too smal for the surrounding neighborhood, and because there are two significant varances required. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City o Heights that the lot division of Lot 13, Lametti Addition No. 2 is denied. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 2nd May, 1989. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 0 ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk Charles E. Mertensotto, Mendota reby day of or r- April 24, 1989 James Danielson City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Danielson: We are writing in response to a letter dated April 6, 1989 from Kev- regarding an April 25, 1989 Notice of Hearing on the subdivision o Block 1 Lametti Addition No. 2. We are the owners of the lot adj the east side, to the above described lot. Our address is 546 Winsl Lot 14, Block 1 Lametti Addition No. 2. Inasmuch as it is our neighborhood ambience, division of Lot 13. division is to create constructed. Because surrounding lots, this values. Sincerely, C. Dennis Miller Carol J. Miller 546 Winston Court Mendota Heights, MN desire to maintain and conserve the currentl we hereby formally state our opposition to It is our understanding that the purpose of a new lot on which a single family house of the close proximity of five existing how new construction will negatively impact ou Phone 457-6176 298-0997 (Dennis -work) 642-4033 (Carol -work) n Frazel 1 f Lot 13, acent, on on Court, existing the sub - this sub - is to be ?s on the property CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: JAMES E. DANIELSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR KEVIN D. BATCHELDER, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT SUBJECT: Hanson Subdivision Case No. 89-10 DATE: April 18, 1989 DISCUSSION• Mr. LeRoy Hanson was in to see Howard Dahlgren and Staff an informed us that many years ago, he sold and developed a to on Winston Court. At that time, he divided off the rear portion of the lot (Lot 13) and applied to the City for subdivision approval. It was recommended for approval by t Planning Commission, but denied by the City Council. He is returning now to try again. Staff visited the site and offers the following comments: 1. There is a utility easement running approximately at the building setback line with overhead electric and telephone lines on it. This easement and pole location will need to be addressed in some fashion. 2. There are a number of mature trees (cottonwoods mostly) on the site that will need to be removed... 3. There is a shed and some playground equipment that appear to belong to the home fronting on Winston Cour that could be located on or very near the property. There is also a garage on lot 14 that is located behi the -house, and close -to this proposed lot. This sury should have some of these surrounding structures loca on it so that we can address any problems that may be associated with them. 4. The lot is presently not well manicured as are all the other lots in the neighborhood and if a new home goes in, it would upgrade aesthetic appearance of the neighborhood. 5. The neighbor who lives on lot 14 called City Hall and expressed her opposition to the proposal. 6. In order to approve this need to approve variances (5140 sq. ft. of area an ACTION R�UIRED development, the City would for area and frontage d 20 feet of frontage). Conduct a public hearing and based on input from the Plann Commission and public, make a recommendation to the City Council on the requested lot division and the variances (5140 sq. ft. to the area and 20 ft. to frontage). , ` PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 25 April 1989 Leroy Hanson Between Winston Clurt Junction Lane (see sk�tch) Subdivision of Platted ILot M l. Mr. Hanson owns Lot 13 of Block l in LameLti Addition and al part of Lot l of Block 2 in Kirchner Addition. Attached is o survey i1ndicating these lots and portions thereof and the proposed division. | 2. The parcel described creates a double frontage lot on Winston Court and Junction Lane, with a portion of the frontage extending in frort of the contiguous lot to the east' (Lot 14 of Block 1 in Lametti Add tion No. 2). Lot 14 is occupied by a home fronting on Winston Courl with a garage in the rear yard oriented toward Junction Lane. that 3. The properties to the east of Lot 14 are double frontage lots nd were divided creating two orno1ler iob4 which the applicant indicat to be ' 7,865 square feet. Thus, in the immediate neighborhood there u been o previous division of these double frontage |oLa with 200 feet of depth between Winston Court and Junction Lane. . | 4. Obviously, the lot divisionis very strange with the extension of the very narrow depth of the frontage to the east in front of Lot 14. We understand that the owner of this lot is opposed to this subdivision. However, it would appear that the applicant woulc be able to transfer that frontage in front of Lot 14 to that owner, because by moving the garage there would be an additional lot that �-ould be created utilizing the south portion of Lot 14. This is a solution that might be discussed at the Planning Commission and Council hea ings. f�, 5. The proposed lot, as indicated by the developer, would be 9,8 0 square feet, which is a considerable reduction from the normal 15,000 square foot standard. However, lots in this part of the City platted before the adoption of the current regulations are substantially smaller than the current standard. We have attached a copy of the section maF for this area which shows the general lot pattern. Some of the s bdivisions that have occurred are not indicated. on the section map. However, there are lots to the east of Lot 14 where the subdivision o If the 200 foot deep through lots has occurred. go Being a part of the existing platted lots, the proposed subdi%ision can occur without the preparation of e new preliminary challenge here is whether oi�' not a new lot tan be ct eated in cooperation with the land owner to the east, where potential frontage on Junction Lane (for the south half of the lot) is provided by the existence of the narrow strip of land owned by the applicant. / ®m R, i I tCf'FIEN AW�Kew,yfi X 2.4 A LOf 9 /ojs % o Q 9 /Ov v /4 1L 70 -A ° ,s � Y• n '�0r r J LCT 3 PER RrQ M ! 9 — « /5 ft 17 1 i ,1 . lo« 9 w 7 F )�►) S5 'T` o .n . L• 170 n �.o — Oo ,/ , 20)•25 1/6 �O6 • d0 ' Bow dv ,d0 OO 1•0 S o � 3 h�z .R 4 e. 801 h 5' � 4 to N N fj N ^-fZo4f 111 � i11 , �'oc SOL ` W� 5TON COVp7, o ; 7 c o I g 1 t?(1✓O s q/s Z!// v !40 ' _/Lo /S♦ V V r 11 j J4`s.)) lk 4. / .i— y� jc,c ,}tc9, hal rS I � I /.. Z 3' 4 S c i 7 N j 4 t cf / = f�c ,•tcti 69.04 8o so 8o i;:; i{::;: Ao c�±) c Jos 1.1.3 IC 1 LAWs0N sr. 3 Ile 5 � ,{ V SUBJECT PROPERTY e for �Z NORTH 7 o a t SCALE 1=200' h 7 M • , 2 -3. -° /¢ r3 . /z /r of � V ELLL t4 'V M 4115 \ S :. `h 1 l/ 7 ; «I L �1• 1 '1 CL ^ / 3 , ��? Y /Ln- �1' S 7 t w O O J CL 1 L '� i'• L+S i-1 S• J 7S Y j� �^ N VALLEYC1 LANE tk i JOHN ST-. io)o ^r f7o to. %s S 7 14 !t� P 3 Z to = 9 « n_ S L 7 90 to o I/� )i '/) V, r4 e o s `ce of e` uc t. f . IL S- A Q� StrT --A -- -- - - � L z JERotr1 J•• ,.• :rr ( /So s•• 057 6 u ° r7 S ck.U4U.! • I � � ti J L ° 0 51 t . 17 L i0 1 % �• 0 w )9 3 k roi it150 tto to A� tJ/hn 15 ? yo .1 t5 i O 0 45 3 or case No. , yq J . CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Y DAKOTA COUNTY j:MINNESOTA APPLICATION ,FORT" CONSIDERATION .,i'',, ',,PLANNING REQUEST*,i' loc. Number & StreetCity. State Telephone Number: 457 -3366 owner. Name: Same Last First Initial Address:* Number & Street City State Street Location of Property in Question: 551(j) Junction Lane yff.,k r ; ,k Date or Application re Last Legal Description of Property: ? First Fee'. Paid 150 "do, I 3, Block 1' ;Aj plicant 1,1,1 1,A I % MAMA f Hanson Address':' 4 " 530 L er Mend'o"ta Heights Mel Lametti Addition No. 2 'together.with'part of Lot 1, Block 2, Kirch Number & StreetCity. State Telephone Number: 457 -3366 owner. Name: Same Last First Initial Address:* Number & Street City State Street Location of Property in Question: 551(j) Junction Lane yff.,k r ; ,k Last Legal Description of Property: ? First Initial (See (S attached for le al de8cri 0 Sou�h' onion of Lot compiete I tion} 3, Block 1' Address':' 4 " 530 'u .function Lane' Mend'o"ta Heights ":,'-41fnnes" ti 0 Number & StreetCity. State Telephone Number: 457 -3366 owner. Name: Same Last First Initial Address:* Number & Street City State Street Location of Property in Question: 551(j) Junction Lane yff.,k r ; ,k ,Type of Request:,.. ';Rezoning zori ing '.,Variance Conditional' Use' Permit':' ;Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D,l I I' �Ovi I I. I. AN, i,Minor, Conditional. Use Permit! •XXX- Subdivision 'Approval - -C"! P •- .Plan 'Approval -Wetlands Permit -,Other 'N. .-Wits" j I 11ti I ;j:: gl� on-simi Ar I-tt3 Re best to divide , /' 6 'bitie Acibbl onta stii,u, -ti- c newith Lots I Bl"ck,Lzmeti- d9tion No.' '2, and .othe rs in mmedisfe t V I'T' P".ifq -)toi. •i i r jt. ;",f t i 4;� 1:; 1 Nil Legal Description of Property: ? (See (S attached for le al de8cri 0 Sou�h' onion of Lot compiete I tion} 3, Block 1' Lametti Addition No. 2 'together.with'part of Lot 1, Block 2, Kirch her Addition'.l V ,Type of Request:,.. ';Rezoning zori ing '.,Variance Conditional' Use' Permit':' ;Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D,l I I' �Ovi I I. I. AN, i,Minor, Conditional. Use Permit! •XXX- Subdivision 'Approval - -C"! P •- .Plan 'Approval -Wetlands Permit -,Other 'N. .-Wits" j I 11ti I ;j:: gl� on-simi Ar I-tt3 Re best to divide , /' 6 'bitie Acibbl onta stii,u, -ti- c newith Lots I Bl"ck,Lzmeti- d9tion No.' '2, and .othe rs in mmedisfe t V I'T' P".ifq -)toi. •i i r jt. ;",f t i 4;� 1:; 1 Nil Nyrd 1 o yd P--7- 2< O E _ , �y rdds O8'L6� UV• I i+OV QfMJa.YG yv L8U%sZ'/rd &W X f4&0: Jo �lY�✓.f/1r�J ,7�5 00'09 I 0 PAUL R. McLAGAIV & SOIN Certificate �(I�'Q Y 1 }� 211 Wkuu A. .... 11'1•SI' til'. PAM,.,IIs\.511111 ` 1L/i�rtif`cate AGwtea..ta ucriacrea i c j ' i of Anlrbep I Hereby Certify thut this survey, plan or report wax pteparud by ale or ander my direct supervision and Ihat 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor un er the ',�1 1 laws of lhv Slate of Minnesota. Surveyed For Roy Hanson PAUL J. Alcl 1-Y, IU.S. Date. March, 24, 1987 ... ............ .......... Scale1 inch..-, ...fee1'..................................... :DISI" . No. IUU'/9 Description That part of Lot 1, Block 2, Kirchner Addition, beginning at the Northe st corner of Said Lot 1; thence West 158.8 feet along the North -line of sa d Lot 1; thence Southeasterly 50.7 feet to a point on the Southerly line f said Lot 1, said pdint being 133.8 feet Westerly of the Southeasterly c rner of said Lot 1 when measured along the Southerly line of said Lot 1, on radius of 260.0 feet; thence Easterly 133.8 feet along the said SoutherLy line of said Lot 1 to the Southeast corner of said Lot,l; thence'North .15 feet to the point ofbeginning, together with the south 89.88 feet of Lot 13, Lametti Addition No. 2, according to the recorded plats thereof on file in the office of the Co my Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota. 0 v 7866" d Ar. "may C" Cp /7,r-7 t� .t1.. � I I I: I b I i /.2 13 Bo G e I tell I Eurnrn�— \\ i C, ions tj v �� I `k lON tet, 7866" d Ar. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 26,1 To: Mayor, City Council and >4�trator From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistan� Subject: Preliminary Plat - Alice Lane, Subdivision 1 Case No. 89-13 DISCUSSION 1989 At their April meeting the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider Blesener Builder's subdivision request on Alice Lane (see attached staff memos). The subdivision request proposes four new single family lots at the rear portion of 2251 Dodd Road, which Blesener Builders have purchasee, and a proposal to petition the city to have Alice Lan extended northerly to serve the lots. Items that were discussed at the hearing were the rading and leveling of the site, the storm sewer drainage and the need for a temporary cul-de-sac. As explained, the intention is to grade for public improvements only. The individual sits will be m graded only as necessary for construction. There is torsewer connection from Wagon Wheel Drive and Public Works D rector Jim Danielson indicates that the temporary cul-de-sa will be addressed in a feasibility study. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend to Council approval of the preliminary plat with the recoginiti n that the drainage, grading and cul-de-sac issues would be addressed in the engineering feasibility study. ACTION REQUESTED If Council desires to implement the Planning recommendation they should pass a motion app: preliminary plat for Alice Lane, Subdivision 1. Commission roving the I EIDE ESTti i ES O OEMOTES tMM NOXUMENT SrT MAXSED 8T REB. MO. 06r1 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS: i ACA R14" SMOa7 AMC ASSUAWS. P p.�—O—gyp OLMOTES X/Mr OF ACCESS OEOIUTLI TO --^_ OAROTA 1011X"7.--T— I£XCMXARR: TOr NUT OF 011 FIRE M"RANT, ISS SrN Or AND 212 EAST OF THE SO COR Or j LOT IT, OLOCX I, LID£ ESTATESD' ELE7ATIOM • 880.!8 FErr TILSIs.) BEING 10 IN WIDTH ON ADJOINING STREET LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. , rrrr I �' I •MW '..01L Or 7M£ Mf 4M ' 710 100 ••,MX L/M[ Or TM£ MK a 7M£ Ir£ pw 0r SLG JI, T.28,RZL • Or 7ML „£ N N\� S£CJ7,728, 1 rrT \ wd3Y33r r7 "7 /:ii!• 20400 - -.•s-"1 i,. 23 usL3T 24 's•.r C) 7.4 •'• V O L D .y F iti�St M �• IMEST 'ER Crar,r/CAW DOG AV. 503a1 6\ SOL ,:.r.=� /o :I I�' \fJ/j Aonca + ` 1 7` Sa!•7S'76 f r� \. DOC. N4107S1 - •� ••`"; _ ' I ' 1 , - - - •�-� YV SOLD /EAST Fra Crar,7rCATET �' a �� 81 I w°•.nbs. �ail // r •�`j� '.�/ ' 1j : 1 1 j ti F IQ 8 s 7••r M- y �!.`�C 'F+� i�/.� 1= ty lf' Sq'w,ek 0 i SOL 34 g fY v" \ �• D �, '�; ; i � / ;; � Q� 4 1 /2 SOLD I; lip SOL_•• :e•T�. .� /� _ � .•c�V `_; r '.� c�� {O� L� � / r1�F OOC. M6 sNSOriuT . IASOLD.41 Sef-pp-p-Im --- = - -i---- 4 a •` �\ ' IL) .a'1D1,7 G• I V - N�•,°• y 38.,7 i 1 �V OOC: ,,ANY @ / !� ♦ 4: SO`� D -.� ..d.A• I ,r.srFr ,,, TF1 P E yy :F R, wefuY'_7 SOLD' • ><'• !-- x • -' a 7rs b -u .o- -...� w e!,r.fw i • 3 r `;� • \ - • - ' s0m SL 0 C. K rr7.ee • ` �z I Q � � � � � LD SOLD Som SOOLD 3 = SOLD 5 �0SOLD ! SOLD l.0 s ��.. •.•-r -:.�-p . .rrr .ia. WAGON WHEEL _ ...•`• ►— R COUNNO TY ^' • lr; ROAD :s , • Ips .,..,. •--•--• �� ;r MaY.71Tr :�d•S:l-�Y C.:.c _ ----=--I--�-- � fBp/Tw uK Or 71w-:;7,----7!7I�� ! su• '--�— $ 7 I � � \7 I 2 I • �M � Taaao a Twr rvt 0I ( !A I I ,•i I ,3 I 11 I I I !t I t0 TK MLI/1, I I • •;,I•'!?^ It I AC, ��r :-•� i��T I I I I I I \ 1 :R The data required for preliminary plat are as fulluwt;. 4.10)(a) Alice Lane Subdivision \ (b) See survey ' (c) Developer: Blesener Builders, Inc. 1815 Twin Circle Drive Mendota Hts. MN 55118 Designer: Blespner Associates, Inc. 1815 Twin Circle Drive Mendota Hts. MN 55118 (d) See survey (p) See survey 4.1(2)(a) Sep survey (b) All abutting land zoned R-1. (c) See survey (d) See survey (e) See survey (f) See topographic map. (g) Submitted at a later date. (h) Minimal mature trees. All vegetation to b retained where possible. 4.1(3)(a) See Preliminary Plat (PP) - engineering dr ings to be submitted with final plat. (b) See PP (c) See PP (d) See PP (e) NA (f) NA (g) See PP | 4.1(00-:0 Single family residences, one per lot. (b) Storm sewer construction done as part of A} ce Lane extension. (c) NA (d) NA (p) NA (f) NA (g) No erosion problems anticipated. (h) Sep 4.1(2)(h) (i) None � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: JAMES E. DANIELSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR KEVIN D. BATCHELDER, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat - Alice Lane, Subdivision 1 Case 89-13 DATE: April 18, 1989 DISCUSSION• Blesener Builders, Inc. have purchased the rear portion of 2251 Dodd Road and propose to subdivide it into four new single family lots. They propose to petition the city to have Alice Lane extended northerly to serve the new lots. The four new lots as proposed totally conform to all t City's requirements for size and frontages. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to t'e City Council. PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 25 April 1989 89-13 Blesener Builders, Incl North of Wagon Wh West of Dodd R sketch) el Trail, ad (see Approval of Prelimin4ry Plat 1. This parcel is an area of land measuring 388 feet (east -we this) by 210 feet (north -south). Alice Lane would project through this parcel if extended north. from its current intersection with Wagon Wh el Trail, about 300 feet west of Dodd Road. This property is labeled "Alice Lane Subdivision 1" on the map labeled "Eide Estates". Also if Alice Lane is extended through the property in question, it will lin up with a previously platted extension of Alice Lane to the north. hus, this proposed subdivision fills in a gap between a portion of the lice Lane right-of-way immediately north of Wagon Wheel Trail and a p rtion that is about 200 feet of that. 2. The proposed lots would each have a frontage of 105feet. T e lots on the east side of the proposed extension of Alice Lane would have 143 feet of depth and those on the west side would have 185 feet of depth. Thus, one pair of lots would have a land area of 15,000 square feet and the other pair would have a land area of 19,425 square leet. The minimum lot frontage of 100 feet and the minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet are both exceeded in this proposal. 3. This roadway is proposed to be constructed by petition to the City. Mr. Jim Danielson, Director of Public Works, informs us that a temporary cul-de-sac, either at the end of Alice Lane nor h of the property in question or at the north end of the proposed ubdivision, would be appropriate. Mr. Danielson points out that this could be accomplished by a temporary easement for an additional 1 feet of right-of-way on either side of the 60 feet of right-of-way pr posed and that on this 80 feet of width, a temporary turn -around could be developed. It would be most appropriate if that temporary turn -around could be obtained on the raw land to the north of the two existing p atted lots. In any case, Mr. Danielson suggests that the accomplishment of a cul-de-sac should not be a significant problem. 4. Attached is a copy of the topography of the site area in rel tionship to the four proposed lots to be platted and the contiguous Jand. Mr. Danielson informs us that water and sewer is available and that the B&»smnar Builders, Inc., Came No. 89-13 2 proposed subdivision can be constructed as proposed in accorda ce with City development standards. The City would construct the stre t, curb arid gutter, and utilities. 5. Apparently, there is some question an to vvhmLhorno th street would be extended through the full length of Lhe Lane right-of-way or whether it will stop at the north end of �he Blonenor /\ddibon. In any onmo, a logical condition would be the conuLr cdon of a temporary turn -around at the and of the cu|�o-oac as built. | low GOLF COURSE b COUNTRY CLUB RIVAT E). SOUTH PL RI'l CITY OFFICE K' FIRE _HALL INV A 0 CL I CL. NORTHERN STATES POWER SUB -STATION /AORTHERN S,Tj . . ............ .......... —Z AN .0 X ct 0 . .... . ........... cc • TRAIL T, SUBJECT PROPERTY/ ON NORTH p Q41 SCALE 1"=400' • rRl' LANE ILL DRIVE K E 6 ul s}Tlj� Case No. N. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, ' MINNESOTA , , J. x�'r'' r•'«'2 C(..,y=tial., .,- '; �'r" "i s7..•. ... ,....,.tit_. ..r .... .. i �1,�rsf,',•••;c r•�5+ 't.t,•� APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION ��;•�`,'T;;:�r" %.fes ;a, :.4.s;a„ : OF 7 :;t a5;' ".' . t; • t`'k• `,'' '', , PLANNING REQUEST li 66 r,'r ?tl ,r,•rti.. ..l .�b. s.i:..i: �.. : t �.:...•... ' ' r3 ri •}4 tli,lt �;tfa'<,Vt'Tta{ , 'a;' �''• V Date of Applic '!g¢}�',.*�jytlS!,:�i-fin ; i;;,,,'• '; ':.,..`,fir, a, Fee Paid r,x}APPlicantr+' {.�"'•` , •?... ' i , , : Name:��" " 1(tQ(� �ti,t� �5�,.:,� �n�• . �,.is;, Last `iso'! .rt•' if;it•�. k;> r `t: ; �.t,r:*,1 !First; �;. Initial 1t;t;Address: �S 1 S T(J v� EY`. 1J Y�• Y' ' M"L Cr 1"1►V_ � {��;• i , ,S � �t . �,, •S,t;�j.�tt. Number &Street , ;• •.c r: City �. .�; State :!,,-,T hone Number: 1/(/" j'.. Owner t i ...•r' Name: Last First Initial Address: Number & Street City State Street Location of Property in Question: Legal Description of Property: Type of Request: r r t ' > 7 S� t ,•r',: 'Li vt r atio SrS1lS Rezoning Variance Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.L Minor.Conditional Use Permit X Subdivision Approval Plan Approval ..Wetlands Permit Other Zip Zip ro, Date Received by (title) additional NOTE: The following plans shall be drawn and attached to this app ication: A. Applications involving a Variance shall submit the following plans: Date Received Initial 1., o'Site Development Plan -2..o1. Dimension Plan 3 Landscape Plan ., 4:..,.Grading Plan B..:, Applications involving a Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit or Subdivision Xt shall submit the following: 1. -':,Sketch Plan 2.!,Abstractors Certificate (If the subdivision*involves'cutting of existing parcel into wo or more lots). _C. Applications involving*a Wetlands Permit shall submit the foll:)wing: i,full & adequate description of all phases of the operation Qor proposed '':-,physical changes. .-t:- 2..,,'A topographic map _of the area, .,*.,.Contour intervals shall be drawn at two q,:,,;,Qffoot intervals at a horizontal, scale of 1" M 1,000' or larger. j A detailed site, plan of the'proposal showing proposed drainagEto grading & landsca 4. A site design map showing the location of existing and future.man-made features within the site and to a distance of five hundred (500) feet I urrounding the site 130 ol) 'of 1,Applicabl e e City Ordinance Number Section F A .�.0 1� Present Zoning of Property. -,Present Use of Property: Piopbsed Zoning of Property: ck r r 'Proposed Use of Property: <J Number of people intended to live or work on premises, o -I hereby declare that'all statements made in this uest and on eq 'N material are true. Signature of Applican ro, Date Received by (title) additional NOTE: The following plans shall be drawn and attached to this app ication: A. Applications involving a Variance shall submit the following plans: Date Received Initial 1., o'Site Development Plan -2..o1. Dimension Plan 3 Landscape Plan ., 4:..,.Grading Plan B..:, Applications involving a Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit or Subdivision Xt shall submit the following: 1. -':,Sketch Plan 2.!,Abstractors Certificate (If the subdivision*involves'cutting of existing parcel into wo or more lots). _C. Applications involving*a Wetlands Permit shall submit the foll:)wing: i,full & adequate description of all phases of the operation Qor proposed '':-,physical changes. .-t:- 2..,,'A topographic map _of the area, .,*.,.Contour intervals shall be drawn at two q,:,,;,Qffoot intervals at a horizontal, scale of 1" M 1,000' or larger. j A detailed site, plan of the'proposal showing proposed drainagEto grading & landsca 4. A site design map showing the location of existing and future.man-made features within the site and to a distance of five hundred (500) feet I urrounding the site 81 (O.1Rota County, 111nnesota) i=0—"cine at a point on the east line o: Section Thirty-five (25). TOvnsh6'*Twtnty-etch. 1281, Range TNtnty-thrrr {^2t it.mch isr3)our frehundred t to and ri!ty (450) fte: South 0f the Nerthtast corner V.,r".'. thtner He -t Three Hundred and Clay Itat point of beginning of tnt land to be nrarribed, them, South T`ro 11—drad and Ttn 12101 fret. !�1 Hintty-. nHt297)dfett t nth. stv.n 1297) lett, :nthet North Tu0 Hund -+.d and Trn (210) [«t, t!}tntt tasL 'T.o Y.•rndr•d [�Ptrty. the of beginning. And the vast 111nrry one. 147) Leet of the follovtno drrerlh*A ' Beginning at a point on the east line of Secticn Thiry five 135), Tm'nzhip TvtntY eight (28), Range Twenty 123) which is r-ur Hundred and fiftyastorner thence Y.three ten (210) feet thence Hest Three hundredfand Sixty three (363) feet,tthence North Two hundred uand ten 1220)th Two efeet, thence east Three hundred and Sixty three t363) feet to the point of beginning according t0 thereof. the Goverment Survey 1 . o. a3 3: 'N r Na Crr. of Set i_, ._ I C •- •• • •F {'�•�r.- f, Cert. � •OG I q � ''3 SB933:.'1 ;�� tD Ser 2f7a.(t J I Sfi'33:'�1J" 1 W � I Cj l N V � `/�r. v: 7 ptr £rr7.jl PAPCEL � ra„rnl rranrr Tour ry rvrvtr, asrK SCALE' t /NCNr /JO FE£J;:: ';• - .: .-,w -�-,� ;` . ` PARCEL er— U <ry/2G tgFrj 0 DENOTES //2 /NCH IRON PIP£ S£r. :4 ._ . . , , <- •-� i.v r? t{,S rr ffran Nax•.rt ra eU` Z o r;, ��%f�.,._ .i BEAS7RINGS MM AR£ FROM ASSUM£F DATUM. _4:__•� _ __- f__•3t t.�D___ � v --T- 32:.LJr t_. _ a -I _- - Z7Z GG - SB933:.'1 ;�� tD Ser 2f7a.(t J I Sfi'33:'�1J" 1 W � I , V � `/�r. v: 7 ptr £rr7.jl : ? 9: /:� � ra„rnl rranrr Tour ry rvrvtr, asrK SCALE' t /NCNr /JO FE£J;:: ';• - � < c d .-,w -�-,� ;` . ` l _re.r .v nrrrara rr r_ se uwru r. arra rnnraro err. . ave rariiata farrra. not: 0 DENOTES //2 /NCH IRON PIP£ S£r. ._ . . , , <- •-� tar u.r w tar fort w rrrsu.,. •D£NOr£S AN/ROLA MONUMENT FOUND, >, }r7: rr r •'F.�<r r;, ��%f�.,._ .i BEAS7RINGS MM AR£ FROM ASSUM£F DATUM. _4:__•� I GS,. -rt ti'Z `f OATE 4-(. 6-8`1 �R5v1S10N5 t�c4iL'—r �hh;� �JD,>',1�N151cV ? BLESENER ASSOCIATES INC. ARCtrIKrJilwt76Svri aiNarr+Gls.9CON5Lti#+R. t} 18:5 Twn Grua Cn,�s cr 3 ttenoa:o Ha;,r.:r tr.•: d5/18 60 A /6' 2 7 I T 3.5. 0 C, PA E Si r ow L-5 . I o Ilk o'. V) See petal BLESENER ASSOCIATES INC ARCKn-C:TMALMC4PL4t4qW3M'DCOtMkTW� 1815 I— c. D" worowo ".Om WN 55118 iG?CG=.�fei1G. �L-M! �!=+YTP• Na1CoHTs, MN BLESENERASSOCIATES INC MCHTECILRAM9C.-1 PUM '.GAMCON%XTWG taut �Crcr Eames msroao wqb� My sstte 7,, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEVIN D',Pf�ZE ��IT_Y ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: CASE NO. 88-47 U. S. West: Essential Service Site Structure Location, Building Permit Approval, and Lease Agreement DATE: April 28, 1989 Council has previously approved a conditional use permit U. S. West to construct the essential service structure/p facility building in the park to be dedicated by Centex Corporation at Mendota Heights Road and Huber Drive. Fin construction was subject to three additional actions: 1. Final approval of the location. 2. Building permit approval 3. Approval of lease agreement for use of the City prop or rk VA Drawings of the site location and building plans are attached. Council should offer whatever comments it may have, then move approval of a building permit subject to final review and approval by the Code Enforcement Departm nt. The lease agreement has been drawn up by the attorney for U. S.'West, and reviewed and approved by City Attorney To Hart. It is also currently being reviewed by the Centex attorney, and we will have any comments he may have by Tuesday evening. U. S. West is, of course, eager to begin construction on the building. Because the City will not own the property at the time of construction, the lease has been drawn between U. S. West and Centex, and made assignable to the City of Mendota Heights at the time that the City cones into ownership of this property. ACTION REQUIRED If the proposed development plan meets with Council apprc Council should pass a motion approving the site location building plan subject to final approval by the Code Enforcement Department. Council should adopt a second motion approving the agreement between Centex ,Real Estate Corporation, Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, and the City Heights. oval, and lease of Mendota LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY THIS LEASE AGREEMENT is made this - day of 1 1 1989, between the CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, hereinafter called the Lessor, and NORTHWESTE BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, a US WEST COMPANY, doing business as S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, an Iowa corporation, hereinafter call d the Lessee, and the CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Lessee desires to lease a parcel of land he einaf- ter described from the Lessor upon the conditions hereinaf er set forth for the construction and maintenance of a telephone equip- ment building and related facilities, appliances, and a purte- nances,. and WHEREAS, Lessor is willing to let such parcel to Lessee upon the terms and conditions and for the consideration hereinafter stated, and WHEREAS, Lessor intends to convey title in fee simpl of the parcel and assign its interest in this Lease Agreement to the City of Mendota Heights, and in such an event the City of Mendota Heights agrees to accept and be bound by the terms of the Lease Agreement. NOW, TREREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and agreements herein contained the Lessor does �ereby demise and let unto Lessee and Lessee does hereby hire and lease from the Lessor a certain parcel of land situated in the C. ity of Mendota Heights, in Dakota County, Minnesota, and descried on the attached Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein, f ratthe construction of a telephone equipment building, the installion of buried cables and conduits, and manholes, and the opeation, maintenance, repair, and alteration of said building and elated appliances, facilities, buried cables, conduits, manholeand 1 appurtenances together with the right of ingress and egres over the driveway and parking area, upon the terms and conlitions contained herein. 1. Plans for'said telephone equipment building shall be subject to prior written approval of the Lessor, and an plans for modifications to said building during the term of thi Lease shall also be subject to prior written approval of the Les or and approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 2. All buried cables, conduits, manholes, and a purte- nances and appliances shall be constructed within existing rights-of-way and within the premises let and leased herender. 3. The Lease shall be for a term of ninety-nine (991) years beginning , 1989. 4. Lessee agrees to pay to the Lessor for the use of the premises one Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable ation payable in full upon execution by both parties lease agreement. In addition, in the building to be buil 2 nsider- )f this on the land leased hereunder, Lessee will provide three separat rooms which will be solely under the control of Lessor. one ro m will be constructed for use by Lessor as a storage room. Th other two rooms will be constructed for use by Lessor as public rest - rooms. 5. The Lessee shall have the right at any time t termi- nate the Lease agreement upon 30 days written notice t Lessor. Upon termination of this Lease, whether early or at t e end of the term, Lessee's authority to use the premises and exe cise the rights and privileges herein granted shall cease a d Lessee shall, promptly and in good condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted, surrender the premises to the Lessor and, a Lessor's option, Lessee shall convey to the Lessor any and all nterest in the building and the building will then become the so e property of Lessor. In that event, Lessee shall have the nigh to remove all of its improvements and equipment from the premises, except for the building, fixtures, appliances and appurt nances in- stalled in connection with Lessor's storage ro m and two restrooms. 6. The fixtures, appliances, and appurt nances con- structed, installed or placed by the Lessee on r under the leased premises, except for the building, fixture , appliances and appurtenances installed in connection with Le sor's storage room and two restrooms, shall remain the property of the Lessee at all times and Lessee shall have the right to r move any such property and improvements from the premises, subj ct to Lessee's obligation to repair all damage, if any, from such removal. 7. The Lessee shall have the responsibility of payi g all utilities, excluding utilities allocable to Lessor's rooms which shall be the responsibility of Lessor. All utilities sh 11 beseparately metered. Lessee shall also be responsible to maintainthe interior of its equipment room and the roof of the bui ding.Lessor shall be responsible to maintain the interiors f itsthree rooms, including improvements therein, and the exterior ofthe building, with the exception of the roof. Lessor shal alsobe responsible for mowing and maintaining the landscape area,maintaining the driveway -parking area, and plowing snow.8. Lessor hereby grants to Lessee an unrestricted right ofaccess to Lessor's storage room and restrooms for Lessee's use inmaintaining its equipment room and the roof of the buil ing solong as there is no unreasonable restriction as to Lesso Is useof the storage and restrooms. '9. Centex Real Estate Corporation shall hold the Lesseeharmless and, at Centex Real Estate Corporation's expense, defendany quostion of title or environmental condition raised gainstCentex Real Estate Corporation's property, if such ques ion oftitle or environmental condition affects Lessee's interes in theland. Centex Real Estate Corporation represents and arrantsthat Lessee's intended use of the premises is a permit ed usewith respect to the land leased hereunder. Centex Real EstateCorporation has no knowledge of covenants that would a verselyaffect the proposed use of the land. Compliance with ap licablegovernmental laws or regulations, including, but not lim ted to,zoning and subdivision laws or ordinances, with res ect to 4 Lessee's use of the land or the building to be built o said parcel of land shall be solely the responsibility of essee. Further, Lessee shall obtain all necessary governmental ap rovals for the construction of said building, including b ilding permits. The City of Mendota Heights makes no representa ion or I warranty as to title and Lessee acknowledges that it is elying solely on the representations and warranties of Cente Real Estate Corporation. 10. Lessee agrees to defend, indemnify and hold h rmless the Lessor and the Lessor's employees from and again t all claims, suits, liabilities, judgments, costs, damages, nd ex- penses, including legal expenses, which may accrue agai st, be charged to or recovered from Lessor or Lessor's emplo ees by reason of or on account of any bodily injury including death, personal injury, or property damage arising from Lessee's use or occupancy of the leased premises. It is clearly underst od and agreed that the foregoing indemnification and hold armless agreement does not impose an obligation on the part of th Lessee to defend Lessor from its own negligence. 11. Lessor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold' armless the Lessee and Lessee's employees from and against all claims, suits, liabilities, judgments, costs, damages, and e penses, including legal expenses, which may accrue against, be ch rged to or recovered from Lessee or Lessee's employees by reason or on account of any bodily injury including death, personal in ury, or property damage arising from Lessor's maintenance, use r occu- pancy of the leased premises, and arising from the publ cls use 5 •1 1 or occupancy of the two restrooms and the storage room. It is clearly understood and agreed that the foregoing indemnification and hold harmless agreement does not impose an obligation on the part of the Lessor to defend Lessee from its own negligenc . 12. In the event any part or all of the leased premises are taken by eminent domain, the Lessor and Lessee shall shar in any award as their separate interests may appear as to the value of the improvements on the leased property. Lessee shall be ntitled to one hundred (100%) percent of any award or other amount paid by the condemning authority with respect to the value ofessee's fixtures, appliances and appurtenances which cannot be removed without damaging them, and its relocation costs and Lesso hereby waives any and all right to claim a portion of any suc award. Lessor shall be entitled to one hundred (100%) percen of any award or other amount paid by the condemning authority with respect to the value of the land leased to Lessee hereullider and Lessee hereby waives any and all right to claim a portion of any such award. In the event any such eminent domain proce ding is initiated, no consideration paid by Lessee to Lessor under this Lease shall be rebated by Lessor to Lessee. I 13. The covenants, terms, and conditions containein this Lease shall apply to and bind the successors, assigns, heirs, executors, and administrators of Lessor and Lessee. 14. All rents, notices, and correspondence from 4essee to Lessor shall be addressed to Centex Real Estate Corporation, 5959 Baker Road, Suite 300, Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343, 0City of Mendota Heights, Attention: 411101 Victoria R Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118, as the case mayb* All notices and correspondence from Lessor to Lessee shall te ad- dressed to US WEST Communications, Attention: Real (Estate Marketing, 100 South Fifth Street, Suite 1040, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402. Either party may change its address f r the purposes of this paragraph upon giving prior written notice of the change to the other party. 15. During the term of this Lease and any extensionsithere- of, Lessee shall pay to Lessor. all real estate taxes a$sessed against Lessee's improvements on said property, not includ ng the storage room and two restrooms, when and as due before enalty attaches. 16. Lessee will keep in force at its own expense so ong as this agreement remains in effect comprehensive public libility insurance and automobile liability insurance with a minimal limit of $1,000,000.00 for bodily injury and property damage to any one person per occurrence and a minimum limit of $2,000,000 00 for bodily - injury and property damage in aggregate per occ rrence, and workers' compensation insurance providing statutory b nefits. I Lessee will furnish Lessor with a certificate of insur4nce as evidence that such insurance is in effect; however, notwi#hstand- ing the above, Lessee may self -insure for the first $1,00000.00 rance. and for workers' compensation ins of liability insurance, 11 17. Lessee will cause the building and all improements, pursuant to specifications elsewhere agreed upon the by arties, to be constructed at Lessee's expense and will keep the Iremises free and clear of any mechanic's or materialmen's liens 7 I arising out of work performed or caused to be performed or mat rials furnished by or at the direction of Lessee, and liens f any other nature, and shall indemnify, hold -harmless, and ef end Lessor from any such liens or encumbrances. 18. Except f or Lessor I s storage room and restroom,, , the property and proposed improvements covered by this Lea e are intended for use as a telephone operating equipment facili y and for no other purposes whatsoever. Lessee agrees not to kn wingly use or permit the use of the demised premises for the ha dling, storage, transportation, use, manufacture or disposal f any hazardous substance nor shall Lessee knowingly bring oito or permit the bringing onto the premises of such hazardou3 sub- stance. If a hazardous substance exists on or about th prem- ises, Lessee shall indemnify Lessor against all costs rela ing to any and all claims, suits, liabilities, judgments, cost , dam- ages, and expenses incurred by Lessor in connection with the existence of a hazardous substance on or about the premise 19.. Lessee shall not assign this Lease or sublet th prem- ises, or any part thereof, without the prior written con ent of Lessor, except that Lessee may freely and without Lesso Is ap- proval assign this Lease to any legal entity affiliat d with Lessee or its parent, US WEST as long as the original Le see is not released from the obligations of this Lease Ag eement. Lessee has the right to allow service vendors of its ch ice to have access to the leased premises for purposes described and set forth in Paragraph 18. 8 20. Lessor shall have the right to transfer and assign, in whole or in part, any of its rights under this Lease and in the premises referred to herein. In such event the original Lessor shall be released from its obligations under this Lease Ag eement as of the date of assignment except for, as to Centex Real I Estate Corporation, those obligations stated in paragraphs nine r9) and eleven (11) above which shall be continuing in nature. 21. Nothing contained in this Lease shall create an rela- tionship between the parties hereto other than that of landlord and tenant, and it is acknowledged and agreed that Lessor does not in any way or for any purpose become a partner of Les ee, in its conduct of its business, or joint venture or a member of the joint or common enterprise with Lessee. Nor does Lessee b come a partner with Lessor in the conduct of its business, or joint venture or a member of a joint or common enterprise with essor. 22. In the event of any failure of Lessee to perfor any of its covenants, duties or obligations hereunder in ac ordance with the terms hereof, and a continuation of such failur for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice there f from Lessor to Lessee, Lessor may, in addition to any other ri hts and remedies available to it at law or in equity, termina e this Lease and/or Lessee's right to possession of the leased remises immediately by written notice to Lessee. In the event of any such default by Lessee hereunder, Lessor shall be entitled to recover all costs and expenses, including without linitation reasonable attorney fees, paid or incurred by Lessor as result of or in connection with Lessee's default and the exelcise by 41 Lessor of any rights or remedies available to it. Le sor's rights and remedies hereunder shall be cumulative and none shall exclude the availability of any rights or remedies allowed y law or in equity. In the event of any failure of Lessor to perform any f its covenants, duties, or obligations hereunder in accordanc with the terms hereof, and a continuation of such failure for a eriod of thirty (30) days after written notice thereof from Les ee to Lessor, Lessee may avail itself of any rights and remediesavail- able to it at law or in equity. In the event of any such Jefault by Lessor hereunder, Lessee shall be entitled to reco4r all costs and expenses, including without limitation rea onable attorney fees, paid or incurred by Lessee as a result of or in connection with Lessor's default and the exercise by Lessee of any rights or remedies available to it. Lessee's righ s and I remedies hereunder shall be cumulative and none shall excl de the availability of any rights or remedies allowed by lawor in equity.. n 23. This Lease shall be governed by and construed uer the I laws of the jurisdiction in which the building is locat d, and its provisions shall be construed as a whole according ti their common meaning and not strictly for or against Lessor or essee. The words landlord, tenant, Lessor and Lessee shall incl de the plural as well as the singular. 24. This Lease contains the entire agreement betty en the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter of thi Both Lessor and Lessee acknowledge and agree that they M Lease. ave not P1 relied on any statement, representation, agreement or wa ranty except as such are set out in this Lease. 25. Unless otherwise specifically provided in this ease, no amendment, modification or supplement to this Lease sh 11 be valid or binding unless set out in writing executed by th par- ties hereto in the same manner as the execution of this Lea e. 26. All theprovisions of this Lease are to be constrPed as covenants and agreements as though the words importing such covenants and agreements are used in each separate article here- of. Should any provisions of this Lease be or become invalid, void, illegal or not enforceable, it shall be considered separate and severable from the Lease and the remaining provisions shall remain in force be binding upon the parties hereto as thouh such provision had not been included. I 27. No provisions of this Lease shall be deemed t� have been waived by Lessee or Lessor unless such waiver is in criting and signed by the party that is waiving the provision. A -'arty's waiver of a breach of any item or condition of this Leas shall not prevent a subsequent act, which would be originally co strued a breach, from having all the force and effect of any o iginal breach. 28. This Lease agreement shall not be recorded; provided, however, upon request of either party, Lessor and LesseE,: shall execute and deliver to one another a short form lease for ecord- ing with the Dakota County Recorder. 29. It is understood and acknowledged by all the Oarties hereto that the Lessor intends to convey title in fee simple of 11 the demised premises to the City of Mendota Heights. event title is so conveyed, Centex Real Estate Corporation to assign its interests in this Lease Agreement to the ( Mendota Heights, and the City of Mendota Heights agrees to such assignment and to be bound by the terms of this Lease ment pursuant to the provisions hereof. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Lessor and Lessee hcive these presents to be executed the day and year first abovq ten. NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CENTEX REAL ESTATE COMPANY CORPORATION By: By: Its: Its: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIG MINNESOTA By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA) n the jagrees -ty of accept Agree - caused writ - S, )SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before e this day of '1989 by -1 of Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, an Iowa corporation, on behalf of the corporation. I Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before m this day of 1989 by of Centex Real Estate Corporation, a Nevada corporation, on behalf of the corporation. I Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before day of 1 1989 by of the City of Mendota Heights, Mi on behalf of the city. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: David S. Johnson JOHNSON & MADIGAN Attorneys at Law 1350 Dain Tower 527 Marquette Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 338-3380 Notary Public 13 J this esota 34.2 .24ri ' 69' 31 N ,south.ssf corner Of Outlof B !29.63 SUr*JeY '-'as ur 11TY dicect .;ur>L-t s i on and that. I LU Q, �111����"°" kegisterell 1,and surveyor undec the la%::S W1 .ati: 3;. '10111 Martin Dat -J �Drawtx by U) 1:§J MENDOTA HEIGHTS ,south lino of Outlot B N 89*24*3l E 200.00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 11int pact of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 28, Range 23, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Coarnencirxg at the southwest corner of Outlot "B", according to the plat of IWISHIRE ESTATES,* on file and of record in the office of the County Recordec, Dakota County, Minnesota; theme North 891-24'-31" East, assured bearing, along the south line of said- Ditlot "B", a distance of 200.00 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continuing North 89'-24'-31" East, along said south line, a distance of 47.00 feet; theme South. 000-35'-29" East, a distance of 67.00 feet; theme South 89'-24-31" West, parallel with the south line of said Outlot "B", a distance of 47.00 feet; theme North 00* -35'-29" West, a distance of 67.00 feet to the actual point of beginning. Containing 3,149 square feet. Subject to easements, restrictions, and reservations of record, if any. 5 ROAD X!�z 6- B - .. C) eSpiko in 6"free Eloy. 871. 67 W-7+ 01 I 7f PROPOSED\ BUILDING Q) 47.00 S 89't24 -3l w - Q E-4 Y. Scole I" = 41ff Feet 0 denotes iron monuments set REWMIX fly * denotes iron monuments found U S. V f t1E-t'cby CC-tLif�/ r.haL this SUr*JeY '-'as ur 11TY dicect .;ur>L-t s i on and that. I am a duly �111����"°" kegisterell 1,and surveyor undec the la%::S W1 .ati: 3;. '10111 Martin Dat J1,Kji:;t(-Li0n No. !2043. �Drawtx by CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS FA401 TO: MAYOR AND CITY CPUNCIL FROM: KEVIN.D. E TY ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: Resignation of Parks commission chair Jim stein DATE: April 28, 1989 Attached is a letter of resignation which I have received from Parks Commission Chair Jim stein. Jim's resignation comes after 9 years on the Commission. We do not currently have on file any letters of interest appointment to this Commission. Therefore, I would sugg that Staff issue a press release that we are receiving applications through May 31. ACTION REQUIRED Motion to accept the resignation of James Stein as Chair the Parks and Recreation Commission, and to direct Staff issue a press release requesting letters of interest for replacement through May 31, 1989. KDF: j ak Attachment n t f JAMES A. STEIN 1752 JAMES ROAD MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA 551 18 (6121452-4113 May 1, 1989 Honorable Charles Mertensotto Mayor of City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Re: Resignation from Park Commission Dear Mayor Mertensado: Now that the Park Referendum is once again on hold an there are no pressing issues presently confronting us, th to be an appropriate time to submit my resignation from t Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Commission. I belie park and recreation issues are at a significant juncture my belief that this would be a good time to bring in ener enthusiastic new leadership on these issues. Since I hav the Parks Commission for a significant period of time, I this•is the appropriate time to move onto new issues. I would hope that the City would move forward as expe as possible with a referendum which, at the very least, w propose construction of an extensive system of bike trail construction and improvement of new and existing parks co with the recommendation of the citizens task force. As I indicated to you previously, I feel that those individual be commended for their hard work and good efforts on beha City. i I very much appreciate having been given the opportu serve the City on the Parks Commission and have very muc my association with you, other members of the Council an city staff. While I feel that this is an appropriate ti ahead with other personal commitments, I will very much association with competent and committed individuals and opportunity to be involved in City issues. that s seems e e that nd it is etic and been on eel that itiously uld and the sistent s should if of the ity to enjoyed I with le to move liss my the Honorable Charles Mertensotto Page 2 May 1, 1989 Many thanks again to you and the Council for your cont nued commitment to the park and recreation needs of the citizen of Mendota Heights. JAS:wm cc: Mr. Kevin Frazell City Administrator Respectfully submitted, C JaesA. Stein Or 0.4 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: HISTORY CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL L. E. SHAUGHNESSY, CITY TREASURER Park Land Assessments April 28, 1989 In the process of assessing open land in the City, wheth r park or open space, two approaches have been used. Thes are generally as follows: 1. For open land in what is considered developed reas of the City, the Council has approved when re ested a deferment of assessments. When the land cha ges hands, either for development or use as park and, the assessments must be brought current with payments for principal and interest by the ow er. If the owner chooses, the remaining balance f assessments must then be paid in each future year. If the land is subdivided, the remaining bal nce of the deferred assessments is spread over the ew parcels created. 2. For areas of new development, the developer/usually requests assessments be spread equally for the lots created. If land is dedicated for park pu oses, the amount which would apply to this land 's spread as part of the project costs against all n w lots. In some cases such as Copperfield, where t e developer has installed utilities, no ass ssment or cost is assigned against the park propert . In areas where assessments have been deferred for years, such as the Par 3 Golf Course, the interes to the deferred amount appears to be rather high. in almost all cases, the deferred assessment plus results in a balance due which is less than the of installing the improvements. For developers of new areas, the amount of nor assessments against park dedication land does cause a substantial increase in the amount lev remaining lots. several when added However, interest rrent cost special appear to against the N22975 + 7117."11-- I VTI rt 0 9 L.. _Qu 't H? 17 MA'rGh ("AR.,/ 3). k T IIi 11 1 L C i I II J 1 t!, 14 4 -1. C 4( 0 GAVIN ADDITION L£0£-bL£ (ZL9) w s - t 4 LQ r T 7, , L. _ _ 411 I ' I 3 _J 4••••••=, 1) W 27 1 112 7 L 1— NOLLIC1CIV NIAVO L NO. LL 1 I H IL r . --r uI 4- L672N (C ;nohl ivr-41,Sr-,1),A5 .1 ZZ — < k•._ -t•--_ A'. .4, 1111.0:4=1: low 7 LL k. GAVIN ADDITION r, >20, n L/CCr) c) 4 - ri > 'V Cu rrri) Z rn 1:4 > FIBER OPTICS BUILDING & MUNICIPAL PARK SHELTER US WEST COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING NO. 74067 nAacll.Vecre Y, I.,era M. AVE • N,.a•.e.rM the ADKINS ASSOCIATION Inc. CO ;C m N m r0) W C 06 G) go z z n n � r �1 �� ;;',;6; m V) _ __, Z I hereby e.rHly Ihel Ihl plan, •pecl- Ilcallon, Or report was prepared byi or undo, my deet supe vltlun d an,,r,' �' am . {Idr, Ir.q Wad /rcrdt.cl under Me Lin elf ' 1 f Mbule.ola. Dal• Il .tra,_tr—p%3 J I V 1 S133HS 3 30 3 133HS coot 1 3 y62 °SI� g` E5l {SW CORNER OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 34 R=1041.74 6_26035100" L=483.33 N0°4316W 639.50 1 EILY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CS.A.H. NO.31\� OF THE ST NW01 4T OF SEC. 34HE NW 1/4-- NO°43'16"W 515.81 On w Z 2 .1.33 �`QRT 1 � A° 4,O l (Jrf p OS, (DN'(p INc tpj R=1145.92_ L1-/ I°4srig_" / S ':W S i i/i. -°° LI= 2°21'14" r .s F ,9 R=120892 r mo P1 z Di .33 3°34' n N -1r m 0 ml *n °, vN n N r m N °z nm m O _i 00 zF mm mm N wn m -n 1 m 4 W w N 1 .' m n m 0 m N W N NINNI038 301NI 0 -nz In L=236.11 60671 I gam" OI m 'w w1 p 0 L/NE 31�* y, �I I Do rD Oz 30 mm 30 cox z>mo 0-n co 30-1m oz.dz cj -D* - KO NA n>P0 m -n L0l-I O MS c f1 z N O w 12" PARALLEL WITH LINE r \Z n / O O 0uX r oJ 0 0 r I 0 1 x .r m t0 '0 1+ m rZ m0 Nw c 2 titiF ' e tic? • 45, cn or co mo zm co 0 CI 01 031V01030 SS303V HO FrIzz ITC L INE 400 OD in 0 co -171 EAST LINE OF LDT 15 CD 113 CO 142.50 NO SCALE CO RD No. 31 7 cn co kns(-( -s i -FU J2' t7104\.S f I 1 I ! US ILDINGWEST COMMUNICATIONS BUNO.74067, the ADKINS ASSOCIATION inc. ARCHITECTS AIi1�SEASON •VF SI MN SSW, •ta•IH f Yet S-0— i ti i_ »—t 0 00 00 00 v 00 00 00 4 •, L7 . —4 IU. II 1 FIBER OPTICS BUILDING 1 MUNICIPAL PARK SHELTER US WEST COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING NO. 74067 • • { 11, III IL p III the ADKINS ASSOCIATION Ino. ARCHITECTS wr l..L.U.M.V. .. rein r•N .11111.. • I hereby c.rlily Ih.l IId. plan, .p•cl- nc.11on. or report was prepared by n or under my d•.cl supervision and Thal .m a dy—q•1 ed Architect under the I . of et of Minnesota. Dale rf-rb•A-9 ey.Ho.yi 3 V3 )1- 1k- -Ix la o z 1 re•MID1•1 11 Elm !iv !Him!, •• J ['3 2.1 al ,k k , 14 Y •- • 90 V 5 4 4 t LI 1111111 31 11 El!j iIHfi 1 IR! A • ) 'FIBER OPTICS BUILDING & MUNICIPAL PARK SHELTER , US WEST COMMUNICATIONS, BUILDING NO.74067 11111) 1111 the ADKINS ASSOCIATION Ino. ' A ACHI T E Cie .1 PAUL MY 6•111t • ••• 1./.11 ifl Ju 6 10 1 tmrotry C•rtIty !hal W. plan. spool- ric•Irom or report tont prermred by m• or under my died tont and Itra: am a dyly_riagl 11 •d Archll•cl 1111•1 thrt 140 ol 1)4 rrf klImmorrla, 0 n 1 p, ao )n)3 Lg r� AD r r 41 R , s T �. L r 9 r p IA o b9 0 a ZP a 0 t 3 ;DA 2- r 4 t IN 0 J, 1.0 f .p IIP TeN 1Ne, 1.178, i *L a 0 0 11 DO z 0 13 r - D Z 0 N� Ei � �e q [ -R El6' a p e p . a �a• �� is � � a�`F= sk�9=r� • .9 TWO" ..s s Y s:•fce. F q "� •1 C R.1 fEf " f[¢l� a Agra rf� eggifg Z PR A til: @ "a<REtE!tae 8 8e r . Ault r » K. kg!Fail e gcr re ` a rrt11 g 1x011»s1 gralix••r 3>s 1 �4_ a� ya 2 . fir E - WE : !!i Rr 8 €!f"Vfriifittij 0r ayt e iilIfl r� ��� Is, 1 Lj� t off, .! t Pzr« II6f sa if !&I! Bg �r 1egtt Er rYg ti I f• IF I g 1 I'lig"C ;iq i�Y 15 i rti � '..,� fiesrOQMI ; JNIGA71ONst - Q/. a-1 i 14 F JI 4. rJ I y i L ROOF WOWS TRV 2.1cfeo. z'o"o.c' t r• iii II II 0« yr r •r 1Ye p. Ngillif4INNI!!21' dig ::::: gggggggl P51 s rgR� g° kra�'g� �»ay���'Q���'s ef�?g,��s'»rr [VII ysg rR�J�da� q$ay� sE g^c•• EsFLIkE I; eLTEr r:� a gii 7:7!:4" 7:41A: se yrs rsti ��� Rg�gyPrjog rr FAti r 6®1:r1K 2 ,v�p�5 P .01VU 4 >sp2;o art»!�.se:#N ._6r� e -rgg$ E. s �M ` . r X.&r O 9 ij 1 dial!! n11 k� i 114i 8 p r.sgakr ¢. IBg6q r tI r1Di- t Er � k• F a ve the ADKINS ASSOCIATION Inc. AHC1',11CT/ Mt MOWN f 04 A"1 0f /AM •'Y NLN • NN '4odid.oplo IM 5—a—o IIUMNw,+I a AssocvgEs, INC. 617 51104111rA6 517 .5.. Q: a KREEt Ingfl ryegk$ yF Frg�g rEq; ge@ rs 4 4*2(OY 017711111YT MA PLAN, VIOmOATION OA At.0.T •N P&PAMO h K ON L0010 `. YY 011/1:01 YJ1AV1.0N AM nuT 1 AY A MAY P.°Maero iN61NLC WO/A T.t anrc a1��5*!Pr)tyt U3dl eAA (YT Nt: 1*, r\ 71, ,r rmaiF�n. iPth 1 2 N g U 1 r;31U 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 4 6 0 8 z : 1n 8 5 ^n la 8" n 0 cN C O 5 Y w a v ■ . . 1 W I , i I F. \ U-7{ Y •p O • S4 ■ V �4 t S t'O »N'w 0 p> pG�> lY^ Y■ gi4 nw [mow `hgapt. »n2 YJR Y • ♦�i� Din : "i" "0 8 Own <vi » <2e ro Q— •<w� aNg raj 1z of Y wY Y n W pupn Go ��• '21 b Y:11 ~e au w" 7ipYQ 7lvwm q roYn i [ .. VI e 3 J W o : A Y pp^ a N : '1 :ii G a IF:-, O S !_19,4 Y O Y O 'lag a•' h— r M a 400p �M LI� O 2 i0� Vwn O= �� U < Y e G O .. gq C r_ m 7 Y. ". 7 ,rrd12,a 'a " S 8 flYan Y 2822. .n�•° us �� WC■ Y O n • 0 0 2 s'" -a C 7000 a a -a -a owa2 :s" 00 00 00 00 00 00 5 I hereby oartify that this plan, speoifloation, or report was prepared by se or under my direct super- vision and that I a■ • duly Raslatered Profeauional Engineer under the laws of the State of M,N ry, DATE + / 17 / 8? Rao. No. 865;} 149eAMBERKER ASSOCIATES INC.. 00e0.0.11100 aawaw 1000 OLD t0.1111001011 It. POLO. FYI1011. • sinOMMOO ihlllli.IhI il;,ilcif L 00 0 000 00 .01x1ID 1014100 104 IIID 0/• OI IIDON00 ll+Ea .x/I DITEILL CASING - •D'-0' DIET. SEI DETAIL. CIILxID EODITED EEDEE DDTDLTOD. I is i• ,'' .7 C.IA..T THAT Mr ..A.. VOW •.I..Aw.n .T 1■ O11 `-'°.1^'^; ..CT wnllv,■a, T nU1 v J"1Lo11uwi TM 1011 M ti i _ " aim P00.109Lo 4 iitaroi I I1 :1 I� -{ T c x• t L 4 fON 1-4 - Qp - rLi liu _ r ��07. ,��xy?51 N 1 I 1 t fn 11- f-1 0�� �� jP {�« "' '� "gym ��� Sr tr g f Z F. t-1 �rtg 3 Ew �i�L x,' . 1 Z— 1 N N L 'a kr L 73 0 O O 1I&Oal1 14011 11ti r M A !I H H O O HMr ww H w E`w^H, °. w► H.w. H . Y "77 .i 1i ►° rw 0 wo wr o0 ..c■ o.. i`o-• O H - w .. wno ra w w. ..r o► °r.. ro ,n ►Nn wHw rH EE wyn O ^ O ■ n n • H r..' A t M t w = v ► ■ ° ww w■ : ° w ww O• N .4. w w H 0- ►n Hr .O.wwYM H• w r0rm2 'i rn1 74 r P� A F. I 4 I e Qoo oo-o fU o .o 2Hw w of Mo :+w Na; oa wt ��))'1111, /� s r.."' - - w w v0 ia22- E: w- i �Cn. w F°■► ■C HE3!1 ! ew tiH • H► on NLS ":r» ►■ rr w'C iii n (' HNM` owH w8 CGo 28 y L S Cavi eg 'g0 .40= :rw• fa nr o. n'r 0r id �1.°. °wi^ Nw° ri �w ynN Ho ►► O► .1► ►r r w.r.w or ■� r. F..w o� .i r1 n w'e i^ iw nn ►Hr0 . ^r HH ='r. ww - ill 1: !:. wM ■ rw FE:w i ww 6 ' r ►•� w▪ P. e o e 1 w A \ r w C. T pz ' 1 M 0 1 1 TILE GOW COMPANY Ekcaie1Engine.,ing .7 C.IA..T THAT Mr ..A.. VOW •.I..Aw.n .T 1■ O11 `-'°.1^'^; ..CT wnllv,■a, T nU1 v J"1Lo11uwi TM 1011 M ti i _ " aim P00.109Lo 4 iitaroi 1039 10941 Avenue NW Minnenpolis. Minnesota 55433 (612)648.9845 • 5� 11111111 I�Ili��l'Jll�ll ili Suite 308, 1501 University Ave. SE Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 Telephone # . (612) 379 -3037 - • tt - • N01.110CIV 4.0 L I -7- etc [.• V:7 1 a \ ; / / L. _ I ' <, •!4r.' b.rf 0 ....• • ;; .; 111111111111111 D 4 7 7-7 N. A 7 7 r • • : • 0.76106 I f"); 7"1° ' LJ 7 St 6ZZN 1 I _ _ L—J 1111\111" r. et 0 3(J 'I '.• s, -actv c , . . .. )1". — , 7 1 L No• E LE- tk J 1 r 1 • • 3 GAVIN ADDITION