The URL can be used to link to this page

1989-07-111. 2. 3. 4. 5. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA AGENDA July 11, 1989 7:30 P.M. Call to Order. Roll Call. Agenda Adoption.-- Approval doption.Approval of Minutes - June 6th and June 20th. — Consent Calendar. L �j a. Letter from Governor Rudy Perpich. b. Letter from Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce. C. Letter from Richard G. Spicer. d. Approval of Final Plat for Southridge Business Center 2nd Addition - RESOLUTION NO. 89-52. e. Approval of RESOLUTION NO. 89-53 - Assessment. Rolls. f. Approval of Joint Powers Agreement, Household Hazardous Waste Collection Day. g. Approval of City Half. Electric Contract Payments h. CAO Review for Marshall Property. i. Acknowledgement of June 13th and June 27th Plann' Commission Minutes. j. Acknowledgement of June Treasurer's Report. k. Acknowledgement of June Building Activity Report, 1. Approval of List of Contractors. m. Approval of List of Claims. 6. Publ/iic�'Comments and Re ests . - 7. Pub Yid Hea a. Paster Sub i.vision;,4ASIE NO. 9-23 8.15�lP. b. Mendakota Country Club, CUP for Fence and Sign Varia ce, CASE NO. 89-21, 8. Unfinished and New Business. S a. North Ivy i s St ee Nam C nge. b. Maczko Variance, CASE NO. 89-24 - Q' v .+C 46 l ng a 10. C. Kuross Lot Division, CASE NO. 89-22, RESOLUTION NO. 89-54. I __�� d. FinalPlat Approval,- RESOLUTION NO. 89-55, Developer's Agreement and Order for Plans and SpecificationsAlice,/ / ' - RESOLUTION NO. 89-56, fice Lane Subdivision (89-3). e. 716 St ichL nePool and Fence. t f. Out of City !WVaexy gZk' —Jerome Mandel. g. Endorsement of Candida o Liz Witt for the Regional Transit Board RESOLUTION NO. 89-57. h. Promotional Appointments to positions of senior Secretar and Secretary. &� Ag i. Re a n of Par s ommisslpnv, a ppoin e *'n t SO r4 /73'/' U ili/ ul t j. St. Pau ater U ill, Y. k. Carpet Pad in City Hall Commohs Area. - 1. Revised Target Issues List. Council Comments and Reapests. Adjourn. — y, to r�� ki CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 11, 1989 TO: mayor and City Council FROM: Keviz—ell, City Administrator IIZ51-& SUBJECT: No Add On Agenda for Tonight's (July lith) City Council Meeting There are no additions, deletions, or other chang the recommended agenda to this evening's meeting. The Council can adopt and work from the blue agenda which sent out with your packet of materials. NOTE: For your further information, the hearing on the John Duffy commercial redevelopment project, whi tentatively scheduled for the agenda next week, 18th, will be recommended for tabling to the Aug 1st meeting. Council will take that action next KDF: kkb to ore, n was my �st week. i Page No. 2562 June 6, 1989 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, June 6, 1989 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Height , Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins, Hartmann and Witt. AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Hartmann moved a option of the revised agenda for the mee ing, as amended to move discussion on he Citizens' Park Committee report to sectin 8 of the agenda. Councilmember Witt seconded th motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PRESENTATION Mr. Jim Madigan, representing 'the Northern Dakota County Chamber of Comme ce, presented the City Council wit a plaque recognizing the cooperation ex ibited to the Chamber by the City durin the past year. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Cummins moved a proval of the minutes of the meeting with c rrection. Councilmember Blesener second d the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Hartmann moved 4pproval of the consent calendar for the eeting, amended to remove Items 5d. an 5j for discussion, along with authorzation for execution of any necessary_ do uments contained therein. a. Acknowledgment of a'memo egarding fire damage to the Mendota Hei hts Road lift station. b. Adoption of Resolution No. 89-45, "RESOLUTION ADOPTING A WE LAND PROTECTION POLICY." Page No. 2563 ' June 6, 1989 c. Authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Quit Clam Deed for transfer of an easement ove a portion of Lot 41, Auditor's Subdivision No.3, to Mr. & Mrs. Harry Kladis, conditioned upon receipt from Mr. & Mr . Kladis of a quit claim deed for a re ocated easement area. d. Approval of the issuance o an on -sale 3.2 Non -Intoxicating Malt everage License to Par # Golf, Ina e. Approval of the Issuance of an off -sale 3.2 Non -Intoxicating Malt everage License to Tom Thumb Food ;arkets, Inc. f. Approval of the moded C itical Area site plan for Mr. Segundo elasquez, allowing construction of a three season porch at 774 Sibley Memori 1 Highway in accordance with plans date May 22, 1989, along waiver of the 100 application fee. g. Approval of Change Order N . 1, Improvement No. 89, Projed No. 2, Executive Drive Improvements, for removal of excess dirt, for a project cost increase of $8,100. h. Adoption of Resolution No. 89-46, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORE AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT F R IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 9," a thorizing final payment of $5,563.6 to Annandale Contracting, Inc., for wok completed on the Ponds of Mendota H ights and Rolling Woods 2nd Additio project. i. Acknowledgment of the Cod Enforcement monthly report for May. j. Acknowledgment of the mintes of the May 23rd Planning Commiss on meeting. k. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated June 6, 199 and attached hereto. 1. Approval of the list of claims dated Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 SMALLIDGE VARIANCE Page No. 2564 June 6, 1989 June 6, 1989 and totalling 153,005.27. Councilmember Witt seconded thelmotion. Mr. Ronald Smallidge was prese his request for a variance fra swimming pool fence height req' explained that he understood t height requirement to be for f has already installed a four f the south and west sides of hi A five foot fence as required installed on the east property asked that Council grant a var allow the fencing which has al installed. regarding the irement. He e pool fence ur foot and of fence on property. ill be line, but he ance to eady been After brief discussion, Council. directed staff to prepare a report on the pool fence requirement for presentation a the City Council meeting of July 11th. BALLFIELD BENCH FENCING Council acknowledged and brief y discdssed a memo recommending installati n of fencing in front of the players' bench s at the City Hall ballfield. Councilmember Hartmann statedbhat he opposed construction of the a lfield because he feel it is an inappropriate location and cannot support the recommendation. After brief discussion, Councilmember Cummins moved to authorize st ff to expend $595 from the Park Developmen Fund for the purpose of installing fencing in front of the player benches at the Cit Hall baseball field. Councilmember Blesener second d the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 1 Hartmann SOMERSET VIEW WATER Council acknowledged a report from Public W PRESSURE Works Director Danielson rega ding a complaint from Mr. Art Miller1 Dorset Road, over water pressure and discussed the alternatives contained in the report. Mr. Miller, present for the d scussion, took exception to the staff s ggestion that a St. Paul Water Department i spector Page No. 2565 June 6, 1989 review the plumbing in his home improvements. He also took exci the fourth alternative, having residents add their own pressur devices as needed. Mayor Mertensotto commented th alternative to add a pressure device or water tower to the n would probably not be economic ,feasible. and suggest :ption to .ndividual .ng boosting the osting ghborhood ly Council directed staff to ask t. Paul Water for a recommended solutin and to be sure that Mr. Miller gets copi s of subsequent reports on the matt r. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. U1tan Duggan urged Councillto do everything possible to convinc airport officials to keep aircraft on heir proper flight corridors and informed ouncil that an individual interested in bu ing his home on Hazel Court backed out beca se of air noise. PARK REVIEW COMMITTEE CASE NO. 89-10 HANSON SUBDIVISION On behalf of the Citizens' Pax Councilmember Blesener gave Cc report on the group's recommer August referendum for $2.7 mil bonding to upgrade and expand system and an additional $700, acquire additional park land a available in the community. S Council to endorse the recomme direct staff to prepare the ar resolution for consideration meeting.. Committee, ncil an oral ation for an ion in he park 000 to s it becomes he asked ndation and propriate t the next Staff was directed to prepare a resolution calling for the proposed refe endum for consideration on June 20th. Council acknowledged a report Public Works Director indicat Hanson has decided not to pur request for the division of t of Lot 13, Lametti Addition N east half of Lot 1, Kirchners located on Junction Lane, in neighborhood objection and th recommendation for denial by Commission. from the ng that LeRoy ue his e south half . 2 and the Addition, iew of e Planning Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 2566 June 6, 1989 Public Works Director Danielson that the owners of the north ha plan to acquire the south half Hanson, and Mr. Hanson proposes the east half of Lot 1, Kirchne to the City for drainage and utj purposes. indicated .f of Lot 13 'ram Mr. to dedicate -'s Addition .l ity Councilmember Hartmann moved aloption of Resolution No. 89-47, "RESOLUT ON REJECTING A LOT DIVISION REQUEST FOR THE EAST PART OF LOT 1, KIRCHNER ADDITION AND T E SOUTH 89.33 FEET OF LOT 13, LAMETTV ADDITION NO. 2." Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Councilmember Blesener moved t direct staff to prepare the appropria e legal document accepting the east po tion of Lot 1, Kirchner Addition from LeRo Hanson for drainage and utility purposes. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Mrs. Sandra Barrot, prospectiv owner of Lot 13, stated that if the Cit will clean up the Kirchner Addition lot, removing diseased trees, etc, she willaintain it from that time forward. She lso asked that the City give her access through the property to get to her proper y. Mayor Mertensotto responded t at Council would not want to allow forma access across the property to Juncti n, such as a driveway, she could bike or w lk across the lot. HEARING - CASE 89-03, Mayor Mertensotto opened theeeting for DUFFY DEVELOPMENT the purpose of a public heari g on an application from Duffy Develo ment for conditional use permit forpl nned unit development, and Zoning Ordin nce Amendments along with conside ation of variances and preliminary pla approval for the proposed redevelopment of the Curley property located at the south ast quadrant of Lexington Avenue and Highw y 110. Mr. Duffy explained his propsal for a 24,000 square foot shopping enter with a free-standing 3,000 square f of convenience store/gas station with a cap city to serve Page No. 2567 June 6, 1989 twelve cars, and reviewed for C the audience his narrative mate May 30, 1989. It was noted tha architectural style and exterio used on the shopping center and store will match those used on With respect to screening the p the residential neighborhood, that a wall and new row of eve planted and that the existing Mary Adelle be removed when th a height of 12 feet. ,uncil and Ials dated the materials convenience 'ity Hall. operty from proposed Teens be 11 along trees reach With regard to financing, Mr. uffy indicated that he has not yet eceived the financing plan being prepared y his consultant. Mayor Mertensotto asked for qustions and comments from the audience. Mr. Harry Elise, 2077 Timmyiex ressed his concerns over a number of ssu s. He felt that the Planning Commission r commendation for another row of trees in th buffet area would have left more residenti 1 area and that the parcel proposed tonight is significantly smaller than it is today: the responsibility for buffering e development is being placed o the future homes. He observed that the eighborhood had requested that there be traffic flow behind the building and sugge ted terminating the rear drive. a also noted that the plan proposes the la gest service station so far. He stated th t the topographic information shows the filling station almost at the level o the residential neighborhood, and all of the lighting for the station woul shine onto the neighborhood. Mr. Wise stated that his studof the topographic information indictes that the floor of the shopping center uilding would be 8 1/2 feet above the cente line of the intersection and suggested th t the center and convenience store elevati n should be reduced 7 feet to make it less offensive to the neighborhood. With resp It to the convenience station, he felt that the facility is much too large a d that all of the noise and light is faced into the neighborhood. He responded o Council Page No. 2568 June 6, 1989 questions on elevations of the at T.H. 110/Lexington and the facility. tersection an Allen Mr. Duffy responded to Mr. Wise('s concerns. He stated that the intent of th developer is to screen the site more tha it has been in the past. He stated that t is will be a slab on grade project using se er line elevations. He informed Counc'l that the original SuperAmerica proposal was for a 4,400 square foot facility wit 24 -car capacity and the facility has een reduced to 3,000 square feet with 6 pu ps. He stated that the station is not an all-night facility, that the light canno protrude beyond the property, and that o diesel fuel will be available. He st ted that it is his understanding that the eighborhood wants to keep the repair garag on the site and six parking stalls will be provided for it. Mrs. Judy Richalder, 2044 Patr'cia, asked the hours of operation proposel for the gas station and how many cars must be serviced during those hours to make the facility economically feasible. Mr. Duffy responded that the eration hours will be 7:00 a.m. to mi night and that he believes 230 cars mus be serviced per day. Mrs. Joyce Farnsworth, 1090 C lien, stated that there has been much terra t turn -over in the Mendota Plaza and she eels it is ridiculous to build a new cen er when the other is almost empty. Mr. Al Werthauser, 2044 Patri Mr. Duffy has been sensitive neighborhood wishes to keep t lots unchanged. He felt that issue is that no one in the n interested in such a large ga that a 12 -car capacity facili as a magnet to the neighborho that the remainder of the pro acceptable. He asked Mr. Duf compromise plan for a four pui which had been discussed at t) Commission meeting. ia, felt that e residential the main ighborhood is station and y will serve d. He felt osal is y to show a p facility e Planning Page No. 2569 June 6, 1989 Mr. Duffy displayed the plan and tated that at all of the meetings, the neighborhood has made it known they do not like the larger facility, but that it' necessary to make the project economically feasible. Councilmember Blesener stated that after studying all of the materials Council has been given, it seems that the neighborhood wants an attached facility. She did not feel that the City wants to put a gas station on the corner only to be sure TIF money is recaptured, and observel that the City should be more concerned abut good planning and good design. Mr. Duffy responded that he feel the economics can be,worked out and lso felt that everyone preferred the attahed station design. Responding to a question from Ma or Mertensotto, Mr. Duffy stated th t he could build the shopping center and le ve SOS in place but that he feels this wou d be unfair to the owners of the SOS. Councilmember Blesener pointed out that one of the objectives in putting the property into the Tax Increment District was to eliminate the SOS. The City wan:s to clean up,%the corner and to maintain a Eeeling of open space at the intersection. She felt that something aesthetically ple sing can be accomplished and does not thi k there should be compromises just becau a of financing. Councilmember Cummins stated tha he has serious reservations over the sc pe of the proposal and the uncertainty ofesign. He stated that he wants to see a so id plan not subject to change and a finacing proposal that City staff finds a�Teceptable. Administrator Frazell explained the TIF theory for the audience. He st ted that Council will have to decide whe her it wishes to put Tax Increment Financing into this project with the understanding that it may not pay back what is necessary in 17 years of the bond issue. He fu ther stated that he feels what Mr. Duffy presented is Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 2570 June 6, 1989 what the Planning Commission end rsed, but that this is not necessarily wha the neighborhood wants. Councilmember Blesener stated th t there are so many questions about fina cing that she feels it needs to be looked t as a separate issue. She suggested p tting the package on hold until the finaning issue has been resolved. Mayor Mertensotto felt that the developer should covenant against the residential lots that the existing berm and wall will not be removed until there is a back-up wall and berm of sufficient hei ht to screen the development. Mr. Tom Curley responded that a some time there will be homes built on th se lots which will serve as a buffer. ,, Mayor Mertensotto responded that he does not want new homes to provide a screen for the existing neighborhood and a ked wh6ther Mr. Curley would be willing to rovide the suggested covenants. Mr. Curle responded that he would covenant that he ill not remove the wall or screen until there is another in place. Mr. F.B. Daniel, 2056 Timmy, st ted that two primary concerns of the nei hborhood at all past meetings are not satis actorily addressed in the current plan: raffic overload at the intersection an inadequate buffering - one row of trees an a fence rather than two rows of trees a d a wall that exist now. There being no further questio s or comments, Councilmember Cummin moved that the hearing be continued to 8. 0 P.M. on June 20th. Councilmember Witt seconded th motion. Councilmember Blesener moved t concept Plan A contingent upon meeting to determine financing and tax increment financing pa in the plan, followed by one a endorse in a subsequent feasibility ticipation ditional Page No. 2571 June 6, 1989 meeting to lay out the final design. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 RECESS Mayor Mertensotto called a reces at 9:30 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 9:40 P.M. HEARING, CASE NO. 89-14, POSTHUMUS Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilmember Cummins moved to r its action of May 2, 1989 pertai Planning Case 89-14, Posthumus C Use Permit and variance request. Councilmember Witt seconded the consider ing to nditional tion. Mayor Mertensotto opened the mee ing for the purpose of a public hearing n the Posthumus application for condit-onal use permit and variance to allow con truction of a detached garage on a throug lot located at 540 Annapolis. Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and comments from the audience. II Mr. Posthumus stated that his re uest is for a conditional use permit, variance and building permit to construct a three -car garage on Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, C.D. Pierce Addition. The structure meets all building codes and was set back 20 feet from the right-of-way at the suggestion of City staff so that cars can be parked off of the right-of-way. He stated that the Zoning Code requires a 30 foot setback but there is hardship because of the lot elevation. The Planning Commis ion recommended approval of the pla as proposed. . . Mayor Mertensotto pointed out t at the hearing on the application had originally been waived at the recommendation of the Planning Commission because consent of all of the neighbors had been submitted. He stated that one of the neighbors thought there would be a ten foot setback. He asked Mr. Posthumus whether a 1C foot setback would be acceptable. Mr. Posthumus responded that th's would be acceptable. He stated that thele is an existing driveway and that he w uld have to a Page No. 2572 June 6, 1989 demolish the foundation of a ga was on the property at one time Mr. Paul Anderson, representing Theresa Meidlinger and Ms. Marg Mortinson, 538 West Annapolis, his clients object to the propo was a misunderstanding as to th of the garage, and his clients the massive size of the structu 33.3 feet) and the 20 foot setb stated that the proposed struct massive and would interfere wit. clients' enjoyment of their pro suggested that the Council cons 10 foot setback, which his clie find acceptable -- other garage street are at a similar setback further stated that his clients concerned that the garage might car repairs, and it is proposed located just outside of their k windows. He showed pictures of properties. With respect to the proposed si gArage, Mr. Posthumus stated th is determined by his family's n home has no basement for storag attached garage is full. He st he built a two -car garage there any room left in it for cars. Responding to a question from Hartmann, City Planner Dahlgre where there are double frontag is the potential for putting a either end of the lot. The co permit process controls which a garage can be built on so.th consistency with the rest of t neighborhood. He stated that all of the garages are on Frem pointed out that staff suggest foot setback because this woul to be parked off the right -of - staff was of the understanding Posthumus had received the agr neighbors. which .ret ,tated that al. There location bj ect to -e {30 by ck. He .re is . his ,erty. He der a 9 or ,ts would along the He are be used for to be tchen both e of the t the size eds. His and his ted that if wouldn't be uncilmemoer stated that lots, there arage on itional use d of a lot there is n this case nt. He also d the 20 allow cars ay and that that Mr. ement of his Councilmember Blesener suggested that the five foot sideyard setback be maintained and that the garage be setback 7 feet from the Fremont property line and limit the Page No. 2573 June 6, 1989 garage to 30 feet deep so that parking can be accommodated. f -street Mrs. Posthumus stated that she Explained to the objecting neighbors that it would be a three -car garage and what the setback would be, and that she did not misleae them. Mayor Mertensotto stated that M had indicated to him that she h with the consent she gave and t consent was based on her misund which is why the public hearing conducted. There being no further question comments, Councilmember Witt mo hearing be closed. Councilmember Hartmann secondedlthe motion. . Mortinson d a problem at the rstanding, is being or ed that the Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Mr. Posthum'Us gave Council assn ance that he does not and will not conduc an auto repair service on his property. Councilmember Blesener moved to grant a conditional use permit for a 33.3 by 30 foot garage to be setback a min'mum of 7 feet from the south property li a and a maximum distance of 37 feet nor:h of the south property line, granting a 23 foot variance to the 30 foot setback requirement. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Mr. Anderson indicated that the action is acceptable to his clients. ADRIAN LOT DIVISION Mr. Ed Adrian was present to r quest CASE NO. 89-18 approval of the division,,of Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, T.T. Smith Subdivisior No. 2 so that the easterly half of, the Iroperty can be added to his lot and the we terly portion can be added to Ms. Toi Smith's lot. After brief discussion, Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of Res lution No. 89-18, "RESOLUTION APPROVING T E LOT DIVISION OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOC 4, T.T. Page No. 2574 June 6, 1989 SMITH'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2." Councilmember Hartmann seconded Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 :he motion. CASE NO. 89-19, Since neither Ms. Diane Foley nor any FOLEY representative was present regarding her application for variance, discussion on the matter was tabled to June 20th. Staff was directed to ask the applicant tc be present for the discussion. CASE NO. 89-20, Mr. Jeff Ward was present to re nest WARD approval of a wetlands permit tc allow construction of a fence at 609 Hampshire Drive. He stated that it is hi understanding that the fence is 25 feet from the pond on one side and 4 feet from the pond on the other site. He informed Council that he did not realize that permits were necessary and that the fence has alreadytbeen constructed. a stated that the fence does not encroach on the scenic easement area. It was also noted that approval letters had been ubmitt6d by contiguous property owners. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 After brief discussion, Councilmember Cummins moved to waive the publ c hearing and grant a wetlands permit for construction of a wooden fence consistent with the application and corrected property survey. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Councilmember Blesener was excu ed from the Council table to participate in discussion of the following item. - . ALICE LANE AREA Council acknowledged and dis IMPROVEMENTS feasibility report for propo improvements to serve the Al Subdivision No. 1, located n Wheel Trail and west of Dodd Mr. Dale Johnson, 2215 Dodd Roi that he is definitely not in fi full cul de sac option and wou: see the improvements stop soutl McCoy property. the Lane of Wagon d. , stated or of the like to of the Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Ayes: 3 Nays: 1 Witt Page No. 2575 June 6, 1989 Mayor Mertensotto stated that Cc decide whether full cul de sac < appropriate way to develop the future and felt that Council she road layout plan. uncil must ption is rea in the uld adopt a Ms. Blesener stated that by no eans does the developer want to extend th improvements beyond the Eide prperty at this time, and is requesting th t the cul- de-sac be stopped on the south nd of the McCoy property. Mr. Johnson stated that he has rot intention of developing his pro erty as long as he owns it and objected to any consideration being given to future planning adjacent to his property. Councilmember Witt agreed, feeling that it is not necessary to plan for future street and utilitp-construction when the affected property owners are not interested in developing their property. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that ` utilities would only be installed as far as the McCoy property and that the full cul- de-sac option is included only to show what future planning could be. After discussion, Councilmember adoption of Resolution No. 89-5 "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER' ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPAR PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SA SEWERS, WATER, STORM SEWERS AND CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE ALICE LAN SUBDIVISION NO. 1 AND ADJACENT (IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO Option B, subject to receipt of plat, a petition and waiver of a developer's agreement. Councilmember Cummins seconded Councilmember Hartmann moved to Option A as the preferred layout Alice Lane. Councilmember Cummins seconded,1 itt moved REPORT, TION OF ITARY STREET 3)," for final aring and motion. esignate for future motion. Page No. 2576 June 6, 1989 Councilmember Blesener returned to the Council table. DEER HUNT Council acknowledged a memo troll the City Administrator, a draft Short -Ra ge Recommendations Report of the Deer Management Task Force, and a pr posal from the DNR for 1989/90 Minnesota V lley Deer Population Control. Mr. John Parkin from the DNR waE present, and requested that Council adopt the DNR recommendation to allow a shotgun hunt in the Fort Snelling National Park area, followed by DNR sharpshooting aE may be necessary to reduce the deer population to a density of 15 per square mile He informed Council that Eagan will not allow bow hunting but has agreed to a shotgun hunt followed by sharpshooting f necessary. Council heard comments from Ric and Layborn, a member of the Deer Management Task Force, who indicated that the group believes that sharpshooting is the best solution, not the public hunt, lecause the DNR thins the herds out selectilrely. Councilmember Cummins stated th t in the near term he does not see a pro lem with authorizing both the public hun and the sharpshooting, and that hopeful y a final report and long term solution f om the Task Force will be available for Cou cil action next year. Councilmember Cummins moved to the DNR request for sharpshootii shotgun hunt in 1989 in that poi Fort Snelling National Park loci the City limits. Councilmember Hartmann seconded Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 OAK WILT Council acknowledged a proposal Scharrer to prepare a study of and problem of oak wilt disease City. Councilmember Witt moved to aut Mayor and City staff to execute agreement with Mr. Mike Scharre ►uthorize ig and a -tion of the ited within the motion. from Mike :he presence in the iorize the an for an Oak Page No. 2577 June 6, 1989 Wilt Disease Study as outlined 'n the proposal of May 25, 1989, and t appropriate $3,000 from the general fund balance for the project. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 FURLONG AREA Council acknowledged and briefldiscussed a follow up report on Furlong A ea home purchases. Councilmember Blesener moved to dopt the draft policy statement regarding the City's willingness to acquire properties at the request of the owner, to authorize circulation of the statement to the Furlong neighborhood, and to invite neig boyhood residents to attend the June 20t meeting. COPPERFIELD STOP SIGNS Police Chief Delmont was present and discussed his report and recommedations for stop signs in the Copperfiel area. Mr. Mike Dwyer and Mr. Phil Vill ume, Copperfield residents, were pres nt to endorse Chief Delmont's recommen ations. Chief Delmont informed Council that he hopes to be at the June 20th meeting with a proposed policy and checklist for signs so that consistent rationale can be applied to requests for signs. After discussion, Councilmember 3lesener moved adoption of Ordinance No. a65, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1113." Councilmember Hartmann seconded he motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 1 Cummins COMMISSION APPOINTMENT Council acknowledged a memo from Administrator Frazell regarding applications for appointment to he Parks and Recreation Commission. It w s the consensus of Council that Counci meet at 7:00 P.M. on June 20th to conduct interviews with the candidates. AIRPORT COMMITTEE Council acknowledged a letter frm Senator Knutson regarding the Airport St dy Bill and appointment of members to th Airport Study Committee. Staff was dire ted to request a copy of the bill as ad pted. Page No. 2578 June 6, 1989 COMPUTER Council acknowledged a memo from he City Clerk regarding acquisition of co puter equipment for Gopher State one -Ca 1 Responses. Councilmember Hartmann moved to a thorize acquisition of an Express -XT comp ter, color monitor, printer and modem for an amount not to exceed $2,100, to a financed by the Utility Fund. Councilmember Witt seconded the Potion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 COUNCIL COMMENTS Mayor Mertensotto asked whether the old Fire Station was vacated on June 1st. Administrator Frazell was directEd to look into the matter. Staff was also directed to check on weeds along Lexington Avenue and South Plaza Drive, sand washing from 1016 an 1022 Chippewa, and to contact the dev loper at the Marie/Victoria intersection bout street sweeping. Councilmember, Blesener stated th t the West property at Marie and Delaware i for sale and felt that it is appropriate o try to get an option on the property. Administrator Frazell stated tha he would contact the school superintenden to see what the School District intenti ns are and will talk with the landowner and respond to Council on June 20th. ADJOURN There being no further business o come before the Council, Councilmemb r Hartmann moved that the meeting be adjou ned. Councilmember Cummins seconded he motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT; 11:15 o'clock P.M. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE b, 1989 Concrete Licenses: Lee -Jay Brick & Stone Construction Sta-Lor Masonry Excavating Licenses: Bjorkman Excavating Dasen Contracting Co., Inc. Glenn Rehbein Excavating, Inc. Maplewood Mechanical, Inc. Marty Bros., Excavating Parenteau Excavating Rayco Excavating Weierke Excavating & Trenching Gas Piping License: Palmer Service Electric Company General Contractor Licenses: D.J. Construction & Excavating, Inc. Dolphin Pool &:Spa Langer Construction Linrod Custom Homes, Inc. Merle's Construction Co:, Inc. Pete Leverty Exteriors Republic Building Corp. Tad's Construction Heating & Air Conditioning -Licenses:. Palmer Service Electric Plastering/Stucco License: J & J Enterprises Drywall, Inc. RUDY PERPICH GOVERNOR STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE of THE GovERNon ST. PAUL 55155 Sports The Right Business For Minnesota by Governor Rudy Perpich Now that we have won the right to host the 1992 Sup Minnesota has staked its claim.as the sports capital o world -over t -he neat four•.- ears. More than 40 major sp events will occur in Minnesota between now and 1993, r in more than $200 million in economic benefit for our Among the events the people of Minnesota can look forw are the U.S. Olympic Sports Festival and the NCAA Ice Final Four in 1990, the International Special Olympics International Figure Skating Championships and the U.S Golf Championship in 1991, the NCAA Basketball Final F the Super Bowl in 1992, and the World Masters Games i This fantastic line-up could not have happened without persistent, dedicated effort of people in dozens of Mi communities. It is fitting that these events will re effort by providing a substantial boost to the economy civic pride of communities all across our state. ;r Bowl, the irting :sulting ;tate. and to 3ockey the Open our and 1993. the nnesota and that and the Five years ago in my 1984 State of the State address, I pledged that Minnesota would go all-out to promote and producE the most successful and comprehensive sports program in the wo ld. From the start, the people of Minnesota have worked together in public-private partnership to fulfill that pledge. Before 1984 was over, we had a 21 -person task force working to bring professional basketball to Minnesota. We were building the first of our world-class amateur sports facilitie --the Giants' Ridge Ski Center in Biwabik. And we had madeour first bid to host the Super Bowl. Then in 1987, we created the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission, and appropriated more than $29 million do lars for sports facilities and associations. This money leveraged an additional $20 million in city, county and private se for resources. Today, those years of planning and effort have pro"vet excellent investment in the future economy, pride anc health of Minnesota. We now have a professional basketball team that will this fall --and will soon have its own arena in downti Minneapolis. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER S,.." to be an physical egin play -2 - We have world-class amateur sports facilities throughout Minnesota, hosting events which will generate at least four dollars in economic development activity for every dollar we have invested, infusing tens of millions of dollars into our statewide economy. And we have the Super Bowl coming in 1992, which will create tens of millions more dollars for our economy, and more publicity and worldwide recognition for our state than ever hope to obtain through advertising. We intend to maintain our national and international lea position in the hosting of sporting events, by continuin expand the scope and quality of our athletic facilities. next important goal is the 1994 World Cup of Soccer, whi many times bigger than the Super Bowl in worldwide impac host this event, we will need to expand the stadium and National Sports Center. in Blaine. The Minnesota Amateur Commission will be requesting approximately $20 million year for this expansion and for the other facilities development necessary to keep our amateur sports program track. Along with the significant economic benefits which direc translate into increased revenues and jobs for Minnesota sports program enhances our community spirit and quality life in this state. Community and statewide events for entire family --such as the Star of the North Games takin this week in Burnsville --are also part of our effort. A Blaine to Biwabik to St. Cloud, Minnesotans of all ages enjoying our -world-class sports facilities on a daily ba The result is better fitness, health and a deeper sense community for our citizens. As we prepare for the dozens of major sporting events th benefit our economy and our civic pride, I once again wa thank the people of Minnesota for putting in the effort has made this our sports program a success story. Due t hard work, we are the sporting capital of the world. could ership to Our h is . To he Sports M ly s, our of he place d f rom re is. f t will t to hat your June 23, 1989 NORTHERN DAKOTA Cof UNTY CHAMBERS OF COMM�RCLE: 1301 Corporate Center Drive #11G Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Eagan Chamber of Commerce Mendota Heights Chamber ofCommerce Rosemount Chamber ofCommerce West St. Paul Chamber ofCommerce and the Cities cdLUydu|e. Mendota and Sunfish Lake Mr. Kevin FrazeIl City Administrator of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria curve Mendota Heights, Mn 55118 Dear Kevin: 612-452-9872 Thank you and the City of Mendota Heights very much for the $sOo contribution for the 1988 Mendota Heights/West 8t. Paul Communit) Service Directory publication. We certainly appreciate your continued support of this project s Siare looking forward to putting the 1989 directory together soon. Y.Aber ve Director OAA: db RICHARD G. SPICER PETER H. WATSON HOWARD S. CARP MICHAEL L. MARTINEZ June 26, 1989 SPICER, WATSON & CARP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 828 NORWEST MIDLAND BUILDING 401 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SS401 TELEPHONE (612) 341-4334 MN TOLL-FREE 1-800-328-75SB City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Attention: Kevein D. Frazell, City Administrator Dear Kevin: J would like to take this opportunity to thank the Mayo and th6 City Council for my recent appointment to the City's Packs and Recreation Commission. I want you all to k ow I ti will use my best efforts to promote the City of Me data Heights. in than you for the confidence you have shown in me y truly yours, Ncha�szd-'C- Spicer tr-,.orney at Law R G S : s b"*-.,, I CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ff we July 5, 198; TO: Mayor, City Council and City)tr ator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Southridge Business Center 2nd Addition Final Plat Case No. 89- r%T0nTT0VTnAT . United Properties received Planned Unit Development and prelininary plat approval for the Southridge Business Center 2nd Addition from City Council in December 1988. They were then held up until now trying to get a driveway opening approved for Pilot Knob Road from Dakota County. This driveway access has now been approved and United Properties desire 3 to complete the plat. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Southridge Business Center 2nd Addi ion plat be approved as presented. % ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 89-_, RESOLUTION APPROVING PLAT FOR SOUTHRIDGE BUSINESS CENTER 2ND ADDITION. "L should FINAL City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89 - RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR SOUTHRIDGE BUSINESS CENTER 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, a final plat for Southridge Business Center 2nd Addii been submitted to the Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said final plat; and has NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the final plat of Southridge Business Center 2nd Addition submitted at this meeting is hereby approved. 2. That the appropriate City officials be and they are herelly authorized to execute the final plat on behalf of the Ciy of Mendota Heights. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 111 July, 1989• CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By 'z. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk Charles E. Mertensotto, day of CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 5, 19891 TO: Mayor, City Council and Ci«t ��rator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Assessment Rolls DISCUSSION: The following projects are substantially completed and need rolls prepared: Sibley Memorial Highway (Cornick) 87-6 Sibley Heights (Bjorkland) 87-5 Mendota Heights Road & Huber Drive 86-1 Victoria Highlands (Bream) 87-7 Bridgeview Shores (Mary Anderson) 88-1 Copperfield IV 88-2 Staff intends to have the rolls completed by August 1st and needed hearings at the September 5th meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council order the assessments roll pre for the above listed projects. :. ACTION REQUIRED: aessment t any tion If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 89-_, RESOLUTION ORDERING T E PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR 1176 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY & ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO. 6); SIBLEY HEIGHTS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO. 5); MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD & HUBER DRIVE (M.S.A. PROTECT NO. 140-104-02 & 140-103-08, IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 1); VICTO IA HIGHLANDS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO. 7); BRIDGEVIEW SHORES (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. 1); COPPERFIELD IV (IMPROVEMENT N . 88, PROJECT NO. 2). .a ,= a City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89 - RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLLS 1176 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY & ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT N PROJECT NO. 6; SIBLEY HEIGHTS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO. 5 HEIGHTS ROAD & HUBER DRIVE (M.S.A. PROJECT NO. 110-101-02 & 14 IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 1); VICTORIA HIGHLANDS (IMPROVEM PROJECT NO. 7); BRIDGEVIEW SHORES (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT COPPERFIELD IV (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO.2) WHEREAS, contracts have heretofore been let for the construction following described improvement: and . 87, MENDOTA -103-08, NT NO. 87, NO. 1); the The construction of sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water, street, curb and gutter improvements to serve Sibley Heights, Mendota Heights Road & Huber Drive, Victoria Highlands, Bridgeview Shores and Copper field IV and adjacent areas (which improvements have heretofore been known and designated as Improvement No. 87-5, 86-1, 87-7, 88-1 and 88-2). The construction of watermain extension to serve 1176 Sibley lemorial Highway and adjacent areas (which improvements have heretofor been known and designated as Improvement No. 87, Project 6). WHEREAS, the construction of said improvements has been subs completed. NOT THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the Oily of Mendota Heights as follows: 1. That the total cost of the above described improvements s all be assessed against all properties benefited by said improvem nts. 2. That the City Clerk with the aid and assistance of the Ci -.y Engineer be and is hereby authorized and directed to prepare Che sepa- rate assessment roll for the above described improvements showing the proper amount to be assessed against each of the lots, pieces or par- cels of land benefited by said improvements. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights thisll 1989• CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk day of July, M o .v CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 5, 98 To: Mayor, City Council and Cit dod's-trator - From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistan� Subject: Joint Powers Agreement, Household Hazardous Waste Collection Day INTRODUCTION On May 6, 1989 the City of Mendota Heights participted in a successful Household Hazardous Waste Collection Day. is was a a joint, cooperative effort with the cities of South St.tul, West St. Paul, Ramsey County (Westside of St. Paul) and Dako a County. As part of this joint venture we were required to enter a Joint Powers Agreement. I am submitting this document for your signature. As was anticipated, the County did not send this document out for signature until after the event was held. DISCUSSION As a party to this agreement we were required to help organize, recruit volunteers, solicit food donations for the volunteers, lend traffic cones, etc. We were able to accomplish our end of the bargain and help Dakota County conduct one of their most 'successful collection days ever. There were no costs to the City of Mendota Heights with exception of the time I spent coordinating the event. V As a result of the collection day, we will get cred t for the amount of recyclables diverted from 'the waste stre m. This credit will count towards our 9% waste abatement g:)al. The following facts describe the collection: 1. 824 vehicles passed through the gates and were surveyed. 2. Thirty-eight 55 gallon drums were filled with pairt. 3. 125 Lab packs were filled with pesticides, chemicals, etc. 4. 1,400 tires were collected. 5. 2,000 gallons of waste motor oil were collected. 6. one-half of a roll off container was filled with latteries. 7. There was more volume per car than any other colection day in Dakota County. I ACTION REQUESTED If Council so desires they should pass a motion authorizing the execution of the Joint Powers Agreement with Dakota County, Ramsey County, South St. Paul and West St. Paul for the purpose of conducting a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Day. JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTIES OF DAKOTA AND RAMSEY AND THE CITIES OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, SOUTH ST. PAUL AND WEST ST. PAUL FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION This Agreement is made and entered into between Dakota Ramsey County, and i the Cities of Mendota Heights, South St., West. St. Paul, Minnesota, by and through their governing B Councils. County, ?aul and yards or WHEREAS, Dakota County, Ramsey County, District 3 of S Paul, e Mendota Heights, South St. Paul and West St. Paul dil.�s`sire to organize and implement a household hazardous waste ccllection ("collection") program to be held for the benefit cf their citizens.; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes §471.59 authorizes two or more governmental units to enter into agreements to jointly or cooperatively exercise any power common to the contractinc parties or any similar powers; and WHEREAS, the County Board by Board Resolution No. 89-133, authorized Dakota County to enter into a joint powers contrct for a household hazardous waste collection program; t THEREFORE, -the parties agree to organize and impLement a collection program for household hazardous waste HHW subject to the following terms and conditions. 1. DEFINITIONS For purposes of this Agreement the terms defined l in Minn. Stat. §115A.96 shall have the meanings given them therein xcept as limited, amended or otherwise%defined in this Agreement. r 2. TERM This Agreement shall be effective fromthe date of execution by all parties or the commencement of service ereunder, whichever is firstj and shall continue until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled unless terminated in accordance with paragraph 13 herein. t 3. PURPOSE This Agreement shall establish the responsibilit: parties in jointly organizing and implementing a HHW colli the residents of Dakota and Ramsey Counties. Collecti, scheduled for may 6, 1989, and may be rescheduled as mutua upon. Page 1 Jes of the ction for �n day is Lly agreed 4. PACKAGING AND DISPOSAL The packaging of HHW generated by this collection governed by the terms of a separat6 contract between the C Dakota and RPTQ_S, The analysis, storage, transporta disposal of HHW 'generated by this collection shall be gov Minnesota State Contract M-8475 which provides, by its ter the contract may be extended to political subdivisions state. All parties acknowledge and agree to abide by the said contracts. The Cities will transport and dispose hazardous accepted solid waste generated by this collection and Ramsey County will arrange for disposal of oil and batt. 5. SITE ,hall be runty of :ion and ,rned by is, that of the :erms of of non - Dakota ries. The collection site shall be located at the parkig lot of the Dakota County Northern Service Center, 33 East Wentwo th, West St. Paul, 55118. 1 6. DUTIES OF THE PARTIES Each party shall assist in the organizational s , f- duties ,=,L.- associated with the collection including site set up and coordination, volunteer coordination, publicity for the Cllection day, and a public participation survey. Dakota County will be primarily responsible for publicity, educational activi les and delivery and sorting of waste. Ramsey County will be rimarily responsible for publicity, educational activities and recycled materials. Mendota Heights and St. Paul will be Drimarily responsible for the public participation survey. West St. Paul will be primarily responsible for traffic coordination and on -:all fire protection. Dakota and Ramsey County will be providing personal safety equipment including gloves, protective coveralls a d safety I glasses for workers, and all other necessary operational equipment C at the site including spill 'control equipment, fire extinguishers, dumpsters, chairs, directional signs. Dakota County wilL provide sanitary facilities and running water. 7. WORKERS The Counties and Cities shall each provide employ volunteers to staff the collection site. All workers x least eighteen (18) years of age and will read and be fam, the Pollution Control Agency document entitled "Household Waste Collection Projects --Operations Manual" (HHWCP) pr. collection day. Each worker must sign a statement ack that he or she is familiar with the HHWCP and that he of follow the proper collection procedures. The HHWCP shall and easily accessible to all workers at the site. Page 2 es and/or st be at liar with Hazardous or to the ,iowledging she will )e present 8. HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR NUMBER Dakota County shall act as the hazardous waste for all household quantities of hazardous waste collect site during the collection program on the scheduled day(s). Dakota County's generator number is M(Y(J q FA ( 9. COSTS ienerator I at the �llection A. Each party shall be responsible for paymentto their own employees. No party shall be liable for any renumerati n to any other party's employee. B. Dakota County will be reimbursed for each pa from Ramsey County who completes a survey questionnaire a waste to this.household hazardous waste collection. There minimum reimbursement of $6,000.00 to Dakota County becz have accepted the responsibility of providing a site and liability of being the generator of the waste. The $6,00 also serve to pay the cost of the first 109 Ramse participants. Dakota County will then be reimbursed at $ each additional Ramsey County participant who uses the se the collection. The reimbursement is to cover cost of p transporting and disposal of the household hazardous waste from the St. Paul residents. Ramsey County shall, in addi at the stated rate, for a percent of the total of r participants whose residency is either unknown or neither Ramsey County, equal to the percent of Ramsey County partic compared to the total number of participants whose res' known. 1 fticipant id brings aill be a use they :he added ).00 will y County 15.00 for -vices of ackaging, --ollected --ion, pay umber of )akota or ipants as dente is % C. Dakota County shall be responsible for all osts for packaging, storage, transportation and disposal of HHW collected from participants from Dakota County. 10. INDEMNIFICATION/LIABILITY Each party to this Agreement shall be liable for its o the extent provided by law and hereby agrees that it will and hold the other parties and their officers, employee., and volunteer workers harmless from any claims, suits, ( resulting from or caused by any act of neglect, intentiona omission of the party, its officers, employees, agents, or workers in the performance of the services provided fo Agreement, except that it is understood and agreed that of such indemnification shall not exceed the limits of t, applicable liability insurance or statutory limits. 11. SUBCONTRACTING/SUCCESSORS A. Parties shall not enter into any subcontract performance of the services contemplated under this Agri assign any interest in the Agreement without prior writt of all parties and subject to such conditions and provisi deemed necessary. Such consent shall not be unreasonably The subcontracting or assigning party shall be responsib, Page 3 ,n acts to indemnify I agents, r damages tort, or volunteer by this he limits e party's for the ement nor !n consent )ns as are withheld. .e for the I performance of its subcontractors or assignors unless otherwise agreed. B Successors. Each party binds itself and its successors, legal representatives, and assigns to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal represertatives, and assign of such other party, in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. 12. EXCUSED DEFAULT A. Force Majeure. No party shall be held responsible for delay or failure to perform when such delay or failure is due to any of the following unless the act or occurrence could have been foreseen and reasonable action could have been taken to prevent the delay or failure: fire, flood, epidemic, strikes, wars, acts of God, unusually severe weather, acts of public authorities, r delays or defaults caused by public carriers, provided the default ng party gives notice -as soon as possible to the other party of the nability to perform. 13. TERMINATION A. Any party may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving notice to the Chairpersons of the County Boards and the Chairpersons of the official governing body of the Citis. The terminating party shall serve on the other parties a certi:ied copy of the resolution of the governing board indicating its ntent to terminate the Agreement. This notice shall be given at east ten (10) days before the effective date of termination and in 11 cases at least ten (10) days before the scheduled collection date. 11 B. Termination shall not discharge any liability, responsibility or tight of any party which arises from the performance of or failure t(:K.adequately perform the term of this Agreement prior to the effective date of termination. 14. CONTRACT RIGHTS CUMULATIVE NOT EXCLUSIVE A. All remedies available to either party for breac Agreement are cumulative and may be exercised concur separately, and the exercise of any one remedy shall not an election of such remedy to the exclusion of other remec rights and remedies provided in this Agreement shalt exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and provided by law. B. Waiver for any default shall not be deemed to b, of any subsequent default. Waiver of breach of any pr, this Agreement shall not be construed to be modificati( terms of this Agreement unless stated to be such in w, signed by authorized representatives of each party. Page A h of this -ently or be deemed ies. The not be remedies I a waiver ,vision of n for the liting and 15. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE A. Authorized Representative. The following named persons are designated the authorized representatives of parties for purposes of this contract. These persons have authorit) to bind the party they represent and to consent to modificatLons and subcontracts, except that, as to the County, the atthorized representative shall have only the authority specifi ally or generally granted by the County Board. Notification required to be provided pursuant to this Contract shall be provided to the following named persons and addresses unless otherwise stated in this Contract, or in a modification of this Contract. To Dakota: County: Name: Address: Phone Number: To Mendota Heights: Name: Address: Phone Number: To West St. Paul: Name: Address: Phone Number: To Ramsey County: Name: Address: Phone Number: To South St. Paul: Name: Address: Phone Number: -V B. Liaison. To assist the parties in the ( performance of this Agreement and to develop servic( compliance and provide ongoing consultation, a liaison designated by each party. The parties shall keep e continually informed, in writing, of any change in the liaison. At the time of execution of this Agreement the persons are.the designated liaisons: . I Dakota County Liaison: George Kinney Phone number: 450-2793 Ramsey County Liaison: Phone number: Page 5 lay -to -day ensure shall be ach. other lesignated following Mendota Heights Liaison: Phone number: South St. Paul Liaison: Phone number: West St. Paul Liaison: Phone number: 16. COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW The Cities and Counties agree to comply with all state and local laws or ordinances, and all applicably regulations, and standards established by any agency governmental units, which are now or hereafter promulgated as they relate to the Cities' and Counties' activities u provisions of this Agreement. 17. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES Federal, rules, of such insofar -ider the In all activities related to the terms of this A reement, the Cities and Counties agree to comply with all Federal, s:ate, and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and executive orders pertaining to unlawful discrimination on account of raCE, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, or age. 18. ACCESS TO RECORDS/AUDITS A. The Counties and Cities shall have full acce s to all records relating to the performance of this Agreement pursuant to Minn. Stat. §16.06, subd. 4. B. The Counties and Cities agree to maintai relating to the terms of thit Agreement, and shall retain documentation for three (3) years following the last date i household hazardous waste collection was held by the p following the termination of this Agreement, whichever Such records shall be made available for audit or inspecti time upon request of the Counties or Cities or their z representative. 19. MODIFICATIONS Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waive: provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they reduced to writing, signed by authorized representative parties. 20. MERGER This Agreement is the final expression of the agreemi parties and the complete and exclusive statement of the to upon, and shall supercede all prior negotiations, underst agreements. There are not representations, warraj stipulations, either oral or written, not herein contained Page 6 records all such n which a arties or is later. Ion at any uthorized -s of the have been s of the nt of the -ms agreed ndings or ties, or agreements. There are not represE stipulations, either oral or written, not 21. SEVERABILITY The provisions of this Agreement sha, any part of this Agreement is rer unenforceable, such rendering shall no enforceability of the remainder of this P parts which are void, invalid or othi substantially impair the value of the en to any party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties Agreement to be duly executed and warr; person whose signature appears below is necessary corporate action to execute th it shall be legally binding upon them 4 estates, successors and assigns. Approved as Zto Form: ME LII ' �� /e� 2 B� Assistant County Attorney Date Ti Da Approved as to execution: b� Ti Assistant County Attorney Date Da This instrument drafted by: LPD Sc Approved by Dakota County Board Resolution No. B� Ti Dakota County Attorney's office Dz Dakota County Government Center 1560 Highway 55 Hastings, Minnesota 55033 By Telephone: (612) 438-4438 Ti Dz COUNTY OF DAKOTA W1 By BI Chairman Ti Board of Commissioners Dz Date of Signature B) Attest TS Auditor Dz Date of Signature Page 7 ntations, warranties, or herein contained. Ll be deemed severable. if dered void, invalid, or t affect the valility and greement unless the part or !rwise unenforceable shall tire Agreement wit l respect hereto have caused this int and represent that the authorized by law and all is contract, intending that ,nd their respective heirs, NDOTA HEIGHTS tle to of Signature tle to of Signature UTH ST. PAUL t I Emayor to of Signature 9, -jq -I q 11 to of Si nature &,-zo-89 :ST ST. PAUL tle VVI to of Signature tle 0 to of Sigbature j 11 Ramsey County Date Appro7pd ap to By Assistant County Attorney Date 4-- -$I Insurance Approved: By , NXZ/ :>,.eq Risk manager Date -,FV B —ButgXet—an ccountng Acli Date 5 leg - By Director, Public Health Page 8 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 101UN June 30, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D ell, City Administrator SUBJECT: City Hall Electric Contract Payments Attached are two requests for payments for the city electrical contract. The electrical work is,by and larg completed, and staff feels that the $3,000.00 retainage more than adequate to cover any remaining minor deficien ACTION REQUIRED Motion to approve payment on the city hall electric contract in the amount of $20,656.00, and to Pyrotronics $293.98. t XDF:kkb Attachments M all es. 1 for Lindberg Pierce, Inc. Suite 1200 15 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612)332-3339 P no 27 June 1989 Mr. Kevin Frazell City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve St. Paul, MN 55118 Architects James H. Lindberg Robert L. Pierce Re: Mendota Heights City Hall LP Comm. No. 87-10 Dear Kevin: Please find enclosed Application for Payment No. 9 submit by Capitol Indemnity Corporation (previously Thomas Elect Inc., contract) for the electrical work for the City Hal] ted Cic, We have reviewed this application and recommend payment'n the amount of $20,656.00. A sum of $3,000.00 has been retai ed to ensure completion of the remaining work under the origin 1 contract. Capitol Indemnity Corp. should be the lone payee. check directly to Lang, Pauly & Gregerson, Ltd., Center, Minneapolis, MN 55402, Attention: David Sincerely, 1 Paul A. Ragozzino PAR. lkt encl. Submitf the 4400 ID Gregers n. -- ,APP,-.-'ATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYM• T Ata DOCUMEW C702 (instructions on reverse side) Out. Of triads TO (OWNEK): CITY OF MEMDOTA HEIGHTS •PROJECT• - MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY HALL APPLICATION NO: _09_ Distribution to-,' MENDOTA HEIGHTS., MSV _ Date Approves) 0 OWNER TOTALS 3713.00 PERIOD TO: June 2, 1989 []ARCIIIIECf 0 CONTRACTOR fROM (CONTRACTOR): CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORP. VIA (ARCIiITECT):' Lindberg Pierce Inc. ARCHITECT'S 0 (Thomas Electric, Inc.) 15 South 5th St., #1200 PROJECT NO: 0 Minneapolis, MN 55402 CONTZ CT FOR: CONTRACT DATE: CONTRACTOR`S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Clontinuationlication S heet,TAIA Document C 03, is attach a�onneciion �rlfh Eh ConfratT. n IANU OunrR StWM1AXY Change Orders approved inAt)DII Fuevruus months by Owner IOTAc IONS 3713.00 DEDUCTIONS 950.00 A{)prcrecd this Month Nombre Date Approves) TOTALS 3713.00 1 950.00 Net than e by Change Orders $2763.00 The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's kncrwledge, intortnatron and belief the Work covered by Chia Application for t'aymetrt has been Completed in iccordince wttil ilia Clntract Documents. EWE Al amounts have been pard by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issues3 and payments received frorn ilia Owne—, and that current payment shown herein is notiw due. CONTRACTOR: CAPITOL INDEMNITY rnRPORATION' 'Thomas Electric, Inc.) By: AAA�4 `Date:l �'( I r? 1. ORICINA.L CONTRACTSUM....................... $ 1.52,580.00 L Net chanrc by Chante Orders ............ ...:..... $ 2,763.00 3. CONTRACT SUM-rb} DATE (One 1= Z) .............. 5 155, 343.00 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE............ $ .155.343.00 . (Column G on G703) S. RETAINAGE: a. ' '. of Completed Work S 3,000.00k (Column D + E on 6703) b. of Stored N.aterial S (Column F on G703) Total Retainage (Una Sa+Sb or Total In Column I of 6703) ..................... $ 3,000.00 G. TOTAL, EARNED LESS RETAINAGE ................... $ 1521,343-00 (Linc: 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS'PREYIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Linc 6 from prior Certificate)......... S 131, 687.00 S. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE .......................... S 20, 656.00 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE ............. S 3,000.00 (Line 3 less Line 6) ' State of: MINNESOTA Cpurti}coi;.Hennepin Subscribed and sworn to before me this June 21, Y9 89 'klpSi0001fKt!!ff! ' _Yr T'EPAN mnli arc rr. • NA AriV P� is ir+ ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENTLF1 10 6T ° �qCOires UIVTY„ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 20 &s& s; tz Feb. to, t,4llrrs from the amount applied lor;1 Irl accordance with the Contract Docuinents, bases{ on on-site observations and the _ ARCA LITE Pierce, data comprising the above application. the Architect certifies to the: Owner that to the L.7e'? txst of the Architect i knowledge. Infornration and belief cite Work has progressed as BY: D3le. indicated, the quality of the Warr k is in accordance with the: Cpntract Doc-unients, and This Certificate is not negotiable. the AMOUNT CERTIFIED ii payable only to the the Contractor is eatitied to payment of the AMOUNT CEI(i1TICD. Contractor named herein. issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudlca to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. A A LKKut.uNT CM * AYMr tCA1 tUN .uNt) CA kt tr lt'At t f t 1I rA1.1.tt N 1 . MAY VZ 11 01110N 1N • AOA* • 4 1'Z t Tett A"ZICAti 1NSntUtt Art AKCrtiM Is, 1715 111%V WAX AYtNUI. N W. WA1111rrt,10N. D.C. Surat. Lindberg Pierce, Inc. Architects Suite 1200 15 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 James H. Lindberg (612) 332-3339 Robert L. Pierce G? 28 June 1989 Mr. Kevin Frazell City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve St. Paul, MN 55118 Re: Mendota Heights City Hall LP Comm. No. 87-10 Dear Kevin: Enclosed is a bill from Pyrotronics for an amount of $293 for parts and repair work required for the completion of fire alarm system at the Mendota Heights City Hall. This work is part of the City Hall electrical work, but i order to simplify payment, David Gregerson of Lang, Pauly Gregerson, Ltd., representative for Capitol Indemnity Corporation, has requested that the City pay this bill directly to Pyrotronics and that the contract balance for electrical work be reduced by $293.98. Please proceed with the payment of this bill and we will ensure proper credit is given prior to final payment. Sincerely, // -' ~Paul A. Rago ino PAR. lkt encl. I 98 V the ORIGINAL INVOICE JIM riYnlCrS A Division of CERBE RUS Technologies, Inc. Telex RCA 219343 'pwu 8 Ridgedale Avenue, Ced'air Knolls, New Jersey 07927 j*0_0R.DER 001 �Am 7 t7SQ29.4 I Q09;k.02,00 9 TIN 0 04-.T2725969 DUNS 9 14--703-9820 CITY-1-OF-MENDOTA-HEIGHTS CITY .OF MENDOTA.HE.IGHTS PYROTRONICS ILILOIL 2VICTORIA 'CURVE 1101 VICTORIA CIJRVr- MENDOTA HEIGHTS MENWITA -,HEIGHTS, MN - 5511 1 m 1130STONs . MA a 02212 MN - 55118 E SHI NFT:AQ DAYS 091 9 PART' S qlp*--,!., S Try SHIPM RICE PC # VERBAL—G. - XULLANDER I PC 75 Sk-31 5 00-Q8 IL AIR40W= 10N"' 3 I EA 175' REP—: REP REPAIR CHARGES REPLACE. 111) SA -31-1 FAL.I 4 �._.�.� �� + �� w '� J_ -mow .«F 091c 1 INVOICE SUB -TOTAL FREIGHT SALES TAX T 28374100 I MANK YUU t -UH YOUR Ql.. — I YOUR BUSINESS IS APPRECIATED 4 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS I-VTMce To: -Mayor, City Council and City �joi�rator 1 From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assista t Subject: Critical Area Ordinance Review for Marshal Property Modified Site Plan Date: July 6, 1989 DISCUSSION. Mr. James R. Marshall, 1875 Hunter Lane, is proposing tc build an addition to his house which is in the Critical Area Overlay District. Mr. Marshall has attended a pre -application conference with City Planner Dahlgren and city staff to review his building plans. Staff has also conducted a site visit to determine where the bluff line sits relative to the house. Staff has determined the plan conforms to the Site Plan Approval standards of the Critical Area Overlay District Ordinance (403 Section 2.5), and that the proposed addition is not within forty feet of any land 40% or greater in slope. Staff is processing this application through Co ncil in accordance with Ordinance #403, Section 2.3 (c) . This rdinance %provides for City Council consideration of the application if the site plan conforms to the standards of the Critical Area Overlay District Ordinance. Also, City Council upon review may, if it so determines, exempt the applicant from complying with any inappropriate requirements of this Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION This matter, in accordance with Ordinance 403, Sectio 2. 3 (c) , (modifications and minor developments involving a sing e family dwelling) did not appear before the Planning Commission. ACTION REQUIRED City Council should review the application and, if it so desires, pass a motion to approve.the applicant's site plan and aive the $100 application fee. i nAAA ki 1111111111L Cityof Mendota Heights APPLICANT NOTIFICATION FORM Applications will be scheduled for consideration by Planning Commission and/or City Council only after all required materials have been submitted. Late or incomplete alal !Ions will not be !tilt on the agenda. 4,cets For your planning request, if proper and complete application materials and supportive documents are subinitted by: q -�-7 dat Own the public hearing, or review of your case, w 11 be conducted by tile: Parks and Recreation Commission Planning Commission date date Following completion of the public hearing, or Planning Commission review, the City Council will take action oil: NW I;S TO 11IR APPLICANT: 4jMile Ick fly ti C�c 7b-1� •1 �P VCU S licn- t t -c 4nl 5 (O t-, 1101 Vir.tot-iiA Ctiarve-Menclota Heights, MN • 55118 412.1850 wil`0 ! r - , IN I lo. T-1 4 Case No.. CAO , I% I m.,�� —IL011 V7 Ur 't M LN liv I Alt, n L lun Lb, -L, rti vT o J,,�;Dakota County -01.. A ICATIb ',FOR""CONSIDERATION .� . OF 1. 11 CRITICAL AREA'DEVELOPMENT-'(Ordinance NO. 403 V t '41 0 'Date of Application Fee Paid Receipt Number ot;4A 9.1 1,4 jij%Applicant Name:* 4 Last//:First 116 Number & Street i S -t to Initial .Q . Last;ft, 'First Initial Address 75 > Number & Street City State Code P p 'Street Location of Property tin Que" Stion: 'Deicription of Property Legal, 1 p, t - - 4 j i9o'-7 W� Z! Cz__0 5P "10 tj j 01 �j 7Z . ' r `�D ,�i��t� eee. !�. I � , 0� . , 1, :r IF. WL�. n�e 'Viria ,Type,Aly a f iReque �j Site Plan Approval v.. J", 115 V. Site*Plan Approv 1 ;X Modified 4,§44i 10 0, -7V700 o�or '75-7e_ &6 706 IiUAN el It ei, /?, ? �6 If, Phone 10 -2 Oj 'mo;i I% 10.g 7 . i13,2 It t�;� Home -Work'' 'i4 Owner Name Initial .Q . Last;ft, 'First Initial Address 75 > Number & Street City State Code P p 'Street Location of Property tin Que" Stion: 'Deicription of Property Legal, 1 p, t - - 4 j i9o'-7 W� Z! Cz__0 5P "10 tj j 01 �j 7Z . ' r `�D ,�i��t� eee. !�. I � , 0� . , 1, :r IF. WL�. n�e 'Viria ,Type,Aly a f iReque �j Site Plan Approval v.. J", 115 V. Site*Plan Approv 1 ;X Modified 4,§44i 10 0, -7V700 o�or '75-7e_ &6 706 IiUAN el It ei, /?, ? �6 If, .�x''y i • . � }� ,_ i'- "'`i it'{ „Y}'•"y'.;f'fwf 'r }±iC # I '"�,'q''f pp t^ r: • w y`t'' :.., "t irk s L•, kk ,,. :;' ! 17.ti 'r" d _,t . -•4`"•Ess;"yb""' ; .. f.••' + • ,'�+, ,.J•Y# ��. <f 3} tp"j. �, Js4 to » .. •, , 1dR�.r,}, ;�� 4 y ,�,i ir' " .JY ;i � .r' ..1. 'r'r, ,,. T"jv ,. „ 1,r t ,,'.-'% Present Zoning of, Prod trty ty->:'1w6Yr'ra� d" + bt*. d e ` 4i}Li MGtt}iY'".'a a •,t Pa• ., }. �:-', 'Ck, J; �'i'3''�Ij�t,(' <jt. *.at.' r pL .7• a t °y'is r .d. Use of Pro #1., it. � e pert'= ,..,��C,fM I >• '.` : t. ' , t•:s:t ,y}J'tfnBJ't. n •rd„« }i ;e*.., ,: �':ez xi» u. • ., r. y, .t�. ?. n'�"`,'y'c �•�." -A, �J,. �� { e.7.4 E.yF• ,� 4r' `off }, yt,.;i• p/' tf I rrt •+�.�i>x{1 y, '' t r;1: 'ri i„ .: , r t: t. f . ; 4 , + Proposed S Use of �Prpperty: yi'{Mv:ii}'ty 7 y4'r5'f,}y Yrs,i:t t .� # o .,a,} wR f9. ` a'r'!><f°i.•�,,r rky #aa''r. {{ �,,d'n. ",' P',S, j�rty .. y,� d }' '� L,' 11.. r! ; t'" . _ , i ' 'i}` or.T,�i,!?k ,'.;' ><' .?�> r' ail' '�. ''+} ,1'� '•� . b....f ,f w} &' ('` t}`4ir�,f. ,:��t'yp i F+t rt ('� "- 19 �1 + .i • t" ':d; �¢ ?i�gctot}R.y ,,,,t•':"i:: i�'.';t'`,�.. t,,, 4. 't',�+, ' eJ'•'..., f:,i`#', }. - +"ki.3'n#, i,a,• ',i(if •.( '�i' •i '%i.i'�,.„ t`t 4'. r: r,Y-0.,.37 :..i.�- '^i ' •''`'k. *t-'i� 's, ,. �. +si •}jr$,. , l"+ a �. I, hereby declare ^that`�all� statements -made in,this request"and on the a ditional : i , t$;•s. {.1' t t t' hwka?i,�::r},f�.1.,A;..! „'i>T ffe'r,i" S, `..,r. material are ,true• <;r'' pk r«i':i'. GS:. sd�3la4Signat t,,.., r�F''•X ;' 'i i�''i.'s• : ;=,�,y=', `'SR }�5 ''=+� i '"';4 :i}�,'.J r".iy 3 •+�,. i .t'�,`t,•tjppCCof Applicantitt ti`,{. .j.;? ,`�?. ,j, '�'�.'�'4 t•, +:r<,{ '; �», ' , :, , � : i} 3%h'�.. n.A4`' � i t'hr :, ti tr ,� Il; � �'t`E, ' ` �^' � •? pZ� �r`x. t.r+ hr t ti .k7*r;. ,.i`t7 •'3 'Oi `�t '+r •k+:i . }1•*:,i•' hh t' •+. ''C,i'`'t�'� :�i :i�; � YrA �'': �-'s.. Ci;�"d R'1,?'h.:� - '2n x'.d•.ft v;` 'I,,.r td'p'. �r•J�''y�'y,(,+`'' ;,r ",'c.;. i • , 'YyP ; t'{t�,Ctr ..�,',[�,;+..4?;'tr ,rF, • „'+' .i• 1�s°�ry.+•'y�ryK'dyw, o-E.S,�.�f,yY'.ady`,:• ♦ r �' {{'' F..,l�' , :,idlJ•f/k'•%% ;•l/rrt.,i+,",. ,$c.'.,r, `' r ,i •.r .y ;;..",�i ' w.y1;,r„ Aate l Ja.: a , sits _,tr�..p J,t. ,k�i, : d r, • " i. iq? t s +. a ' Y y "•Ka,u�., qi k, '} , i f• , f ihh x ' E' r °• , '4 t t fy `.> +` ii -.2 i'J :"` , .wa4 .4 r'.t%"ig{� r....,,a,.,,•.s.y.•',xl,.3':.,':.,;rw. .{.. 'S=',eew = r�~• +" 23ck�k-'�� :jisd`'�`' lr�;.n(u•. '; r��Sh:,, ��4y., � '�i..F4'jd2',�, `' x.4 •(,'t.iw; 'a• �- �'�� °s�•.' i, •. �' cK r,t2 { ,�'t: 'v'' 3; '. ;'i ( •� ' - . £ �'i r.r{., {9h^ r pr , , 'y L,t ',fti'$ (�r«^F.'.;�d'r •+,�t�,�,� y . r• s •�+ . ,.+e`'.'1 k .'4` .i'. •', e.;,, t' I' t•a a rd•t �. r,:..}, Received by (title) �i 1 '+ty i' far �' "'� {'' `"t' �' "''3 'i1 . •' •.=f � '" i •t +' . j +rj i 4:'K ,}!r •• "' Note:` The following' in§foprmation shall be provided in the i site plan: ` �' ,' •- ' YJ:: ,1:•r}, ,, i' j'^ .M,:r„ • .,. f .,f. i.�i' ,`'",1, .. .. ,'iyl«'�w { , ! r 1 ,• ,,.w K'> rIT, 43- ,•,•. • „r r Y #� .» :I '."�-•, 1 4' t Y ',r i' , �:. 1. Location of the property, including,such,information as'`the name �. J'` , ' r• and numbers of,adjoining'roads, railroads, existing subdivi ions, ori other landmarks. •�r•, ! ?" t" , ..', S •. Br' yi' i .r•,}...i:.d=Y9v'1� v'' ^ .... ,. - . '� t,r, `>r .,i•.t . 2. The name and address of tthe owner (s), or developer(s), the s ction," ` township, range, north 'point, date; Wand scale of drawings, . nd "5 4 number of sheets. 3. Existing topography asindicatedonTa contour map having 'a contour " interval no `greater than two (2) feet parr contour; the contour map " shall also clearly1delineate any bluff line, all streams,`i cluding'"�` intermittent'istreams and swales, rivers, water bodies, and wetlands located on the site : rr ;';. - ,• � . ' it 4. A plan delineating the existing drainage of the water setts g forth 'in which direction the volume, and at what rate' the storm`w ter`is ;."' ;" rte;,' !' conveyed from'the,site-in setting forth those areas on•the ite where `3 =`' -°" :R storm water'collects-andlis graduall_p'percolated into the g ound or,,:, , slowly released to stream or lake: ►' ' i.khr"C' >r,,' " aa.;+.,°'.je;isz' i t . t, r 1r3+J �, { ' rr..}'hFr«+ ` {,•j',: .y; t. ,d N ''k + ' 0 •t +, .. . asdt�M.i•�rt1,..s.'•,.,.d.ts»„r.r.y:a. r.:.i�..1 µ1..C. ,.''," ,,t,, t I,r•,'."+ .« i a - yr S. r' A deseriptia'`.ofHthe soils on the site including a map indi ating soil i <,: i t';~''-• ~ '_"types by, are`as` to� be disturbed' as well as a soil report . con aining_1,,t,.,• j i j;�-,: `',j.$�s information'; onathe suitability of, the,.soils for, the type of. deve opment _ ' # ( proposed and -for the type , of • sewage disposal proposed and d scribing; any remedial'steps to be' taken by ,the developer to render t e soils' {�. ,•!• suitable.,,'All''areas proposed for grading shall be identifi d` by• '� ": '�f',, soil type,.both both as' to : soil type of 'existing top soil and soLl type ` F•rA; �..' '' of the new" contour. The -'location 'and extent of any erosionareas shall be `included -in' the soils description. •� ^�, �.#c � i "R f33 r �'}+' i• •f•,. k' ;#' i a«i•pu';q;.t}pr s ,+[; ' W=.¢� ;'',,..3t'.:��,5 h � � , •."• sstt r<�'h. :,r i .•-r a `,:, q`"s:y �� r,~i" ; i.y.. .� ,. , � y � t' i�' •,� "y I ti } .�`.`';Na '. {i' •SIr S:.F 1 � .. atr'; tt,, r • :: A description ,of the; flora 'and fauna, 'which occupy the sit or are • ' . �^..;','i(:` ,occasionallyfound theaceon;'setting forth with detail thosareae'� *.I, '.1,t _ - where'..unique', plant or'' aniamal species may be found on the s te. ; , =' r'r:d'�; ?r..ia •�,I�r�}.,jyC.ll,:;•i.,. . `+n"d' u+r�•'O�.r4::AtTf ld�wa"i�.`rsi:ri+i.."^�ti:�;1r;i N+,'.s��+'Il',;iys"„K;'4 y;:,.'l?�j, ^..'_� .b•. i 'vtirz ".t.►'rdk+.A�aK�st!s''.. {3�'rrF:•t`nv._ t + 4 k4 it'-ii( •`fitiy.+ �t:iy.t,,`t:Y4, .}}'•:�d Fib •:,`d�kt� `.. •'•ilr's.,.'},,•ktt{+:^•F'. X'dtt.:t'J��trfR'';Pwigtn}y;°'-r,.•,.��,},'i,��sdF''�•�`1:�' }.�;,ir}ry•i0T{',i., 1'.t'"'t�y,„”,j^4t"�'tq tf•d,r14,.piiS,.k<S'l5'r'}h.G`.� ;; �.".J'..'O4''.';.a,r�' dk0".-+,' K,."',kdi.l•i"�'s'".':>: +a,;,•r.;' };4,d'•vd�•'�:`:»k.{''.ir+`-' ".'',�fi",xr♦ .4t,}}i<w: j.,..n� :•srr•^s>3' na;.,•", 'sii".ir •,�:•+, , z s .$gi',,,:. yF-k } :y yi'o:,'l.::,t+,t+. rt'•b }�'-Dl�i�.a:.'.''s:NR"w.tsa.:; ,Yit:.J••'.'S:':".` 't�.tip: .ryy4 'C�v♦� y��" .,. ,;t:a,,. , tLw �'�}'.., itt ' ,4 h L•'. to r rY ''q�•' � , >g.„. ,5., rZf d••'"�'s - r:F4 ,.,j: ••.ri� . tl , , }T: . � 'YG.' R ` July 5,1989 To: Council Members City of Mendota Heights From: Rick and Mary Marshall Re: Remodeling and Additions to our residence at 1875 Hunter Lane located in The Critical River Corridor Dear Council Members: As indicated, we are proposing a remodeling and additions to our a property located in The Critical River Corridor. To aid your r enclosed the following: front, rear and side elevations site plan - topographical map sidence, ew, we have: The elevations map indicates the proposed final product. The exte for materials are primarily stucco and stone with a timberline roof, thus keepig in concert with the natural beauty of the location. The site plan demonstrates the set backs from the street, the adj fining neighbors' properties and the bluff area to the rear. The hi-lited area on the plan indicates the proposed additions to the existing home, including the dimensions of each addition. The topographical map is also hi-lited; indicating the existing hoke. On June 26,1989 we met with Howard Dahlgren, Clayton Eckles, Paul Berg and Kevin Batchelder for their intial 'review -of our proposal, It was t eir consensus that the proposal was well within the parameters of The Critical R'ver Corridor ordinances. They also agreed that the proposal met the building cole requirements, including proper set backs. This is the second home we have owned in the Mendota Heights commu ity. Mary has lived in 'Mendota Heights her entire life, in fact her relative were among the originating Mendota settlers. ( Quinehan, Bouthilet, Fee and Fairb ult ) We are proud to Be -members of this community and look foward to ra sing our family in Mendota Heights,, continuing a multi generation tradition tie have spent considerable time to assure our plans our within thelestablished ordinances, and look foward to your approval so we may proceed acc rdingly. Sin rely,�� ) Y Rick and Mary Marshall _ � y ,` i j � ' _ � ,�, - � 1 / : � ��`� , tit - -Fllll Fir- db ►.... -_-.fes-� .----- �. KW 10 /rr� It I 0%11\ 1/i IL V t f V Lam'. senr IL qk f• .-� :... y I f tom, L � I ; rt 4 ;':l iriti a CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, JUNE 13, 1989 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meetir Planning Commission, City of Mendota Heights was held o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Minnesota. 1 g of the at 7:30 Heights, Chairman Merson called the meeting to order at 7:35 o'c ock P.M. The following members were present: Anderson, Duggan, Dwyer, Krebsbach, Koll, Morson and Tilsen. Also present ware City Administator Kevin Frazell, Public Works Director James Danielson, Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder and Planning Consultant Howard Dahlgren. APPROVAL OF Commissioner Duggan clarified a stat ment on MINUTES page 3 of the May minutes and then motioned for approval. Commissioner Dwyer seconded the motion. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 CASE NO. 89-15 Dick Putnam inquired about the act on taken 'KENSINGTON by the Citizens Parks Review Committ e in SUBDIVISION 'regards to the proposed parks dedi ation in the Kensington proposal. Chairm n Morson stated", 'that the committee has acc pted it, that the Planning Commission has o reason not to approve the parks scheme. Mr. Putnam made a brief statement about coming back for the special meeting with more detail on the condos, manor homes and houses he is proposing and addressing the parks dedication. He then stated he was open for questions. Commissioner Krebsbach asked if t ere were any changes since the last meet! ng. Mr. Putnam replied that he had moved one building, the park layout is the s ame, that the plan shows the individual homeowners to the southeast and the future street access to the Kennedy's land. He stated that all 48 single family lots will be above 15,000 sq. ft. and that these details will come out in the preliminary and final plan stag s. w 2 Commissioner Tilsen inquired about t e trail to the north of the pond, what had appened to it? Mr. Putnam replied it i there. Commissioner Tilsen stated that it ppeared that there was a 1/2 street jog to the alignment of Pond Circle West that was not there before. Mr. Putnam replied hat the street is intended to be aligned and when it is installed it will be aligned. Commissioner Tilsen presented a map in which he had highlighted the differences between plans. He detailed the differ nces by showing, in red, where park area ad been taken away, and in black, where it had been added. He inquired about the RigIt-of-Way along Delaware. Mr. Putnam replie that he has to dedicate 50' from the cen er line. Tilsen stated that he liked the previous plan's buffer between the single fam ly homes and the condos and that the hourgl ss shape of the park is quite narrow. M Putnam stated he would be tickled to trade and area that had been dedicated to the par for the hourglass under 'the power lines. Tilsen stated that there are limits on de sity, it would be nice not to encroach on t e single family homes, there should be better buffer.. Tilsen stated he was cancer ed about how close the plan gets with the units, even to a park. Kevin Clark, of Centex replied that there was a transition no matt r how one had to look at it. Commissioner Dwyer asked Mr. Putna to show the slides he had brought. Mr. Put am gave a slide show that detailed the 1 youts of streets, buildings, landscaping, lighting, security, pedestrian paths and de sities of Devonwood, a similar project in Bloomington. Commissioner Krebsbach asked ifhe parks intermixed with the units wit create security problems. Mr. Putnam rept ed he was not sure about the question, it should be similar to single family homes and hat there might be more sight lines, lig ting and security than single family homes. Commissioner Duggan queried about the square footage of the proposed units. Mr. replied that the units ranged from 1, ft. to 1,500 sq. 'ft. and were one t bedrooms. Commissioner Krebsbach there would be wooden decks and b allowed. Mr. Putnam replied Bloomington, yes, and they we sprinkled. He stated in Mendota Heig will be sprinkled and that barbeq dependent upon City Ordinances. Mr. Putnam showed the townhomes t) constructed as part of Devonwood. Morson inquired where were some man constructed similar to the one; proposed. Putnam replied that Bloc Edina and Shakopee had these types c Putnam then demonstrated on a wall r the types of units from the slide st go in at Kensington. Chairman Morson inquired what time Kensington project was on. Mr replied that if the sketch plan was now, the platting would take a months, and that grading could begii Fall or early Spring. Chairma inquired about the phasing of the Putnam replied that the condos woL line in one year and that this was e as a ,three year project. He st single family houses may start complement Hampshire and could actu in before the townhomes. Commissioner Dwyer inquired ab elevations. Dick Putnam replied elevations were close to being the the 16 unit condos and the 8 unit t He stated that there were a lot of and woods on the terrain in contra: flat cornfield that Devonwood in B1 was built on. Commissioner Krebsbach asked what would be left with if this projec go. Dick Putnam replied that th meets the guidelines of the city based on market studies and other He stated their own demographics anc analyses come to the same conclus: stated that all Centex manor homes 3 Putnam 000 sq. 3 three ;ked if rbecues iat in e not ,ts they ling is t were zairman homes being ington, units. where a would rame the Putnam approved `ew more in late Morson project. .d be on .visioned ited the soon to lly come rut the :hat the same for rwnhomes. ,ak trees t to the lomincrton :he City doesn't project zich are nalyses. location ins. He ave sold M and that the location and demograhics of this project have been determined to e ideal for this type of use. Krebsbach a ked how I much of the project was subsidized. Putnam replied none. f Commissioner Tilsen inquired handicapped accessibility. Putnam no, that this would be handled by the market just like in Copperfield. easily be handled as an extra cost, to finishing a basement, he stated. PRESENTATION City Administrator Kevin Frazell gav4 presentation on the history Comprehensive Plan Amendment and t East Area Plan. He spoke about the of Plan* Amendments proceeding thr Planning commission, city Counc finally, the Metropolitan Council. DISCUSSION commissioner Duggan ..spoke abc Comprehensive Plan and its amend stated that the park shown comprehensive plan was done in lie loss of school property as park. I that park is now'a school and that t big loss to the City as a buffer. that the park has been reduced f rc acres proposed in the Parks Referend 26 acne dedication now being Duggan expressed a concern about th, potential open space. Planning Consultant Howard Dahlgr about Kensington and how it relate land west of it. He summarized b: that this whole parcel would allow of 900 units, when including the la: west, and that Centex was proposing and the Patrick property would have than 30. There is a proposal for dozen units to the west of Centex, the whole area well within the density, he stated. Commissioner Dwyer stated that the r units multiplied by 3 people per u add about 2,000 people to Mendota This would amount to 1/4 of the ci small corner of it, he stated. Consultant Dahlgren stated that th. about replied private t could similar a brief )f the e South process ugh the 1 and, it the ent and on the , of the e stated is was a e stated i the 35 m to the roposed. loss of n spoke to the stating density d to the 64 units no more about a bringing llowable ambers of iit would Heights. -y in one Planning s was an 1 overestimation of occupancy. Dwyer that he foresees a tremendous pro' taxing the city services. He stated predicted a serious traffic problem Road and Mendota Heights Road additional 1,000 cars per Commissioner Duggan stated that this 3,500 extra trips per day. Dwyer sta Mendota Heights Road will turn into a and that his kids were not goin allowed to go to any park in this a stated this amount of traffic was sc asked, where will Centex be whe problems develop. Kevin Clark stated that the Devonwooc was built at the intersection of t toads in Bloomington and that the problem is nil. He stated there are care centers adjacent to the prof even with their peak hour traffic gf there are no problems. He stated eight years with heavy traffic a: there have been no fatal accidents. Dick Putnam stated that the same being made by Commissioner Dwyer applied to Copperfield. He stat heard the same arguments with Col that the kids would be killed off the parks would be overflowed. H that, 1 in fact, occupancy is h Copperfield where there are three cE which generate more traffic. Putn that each project would have about number of people and that Kensing have more elderly people and workinc He stated that the City built Mendot Road to 80' wide so that it cou 10,000 to 12,000 trips per day. He half this amount was what the Cor was worried about. Putnam also st he would be around, he can't mistakes. He stated that the pr significantly adding parks to what currently has, it had a diversity c ranging from condos to half milli houses, lakeshores to active pa3 stated they have been responsive City's request to delineate dedication, and asked what more wanted. 101 stated )lem of that he at Dodd ith an ould be ed that highway to be ea. He ry. He these proj ect +to maj or traffic two day-- :ct, and neration that in �d buses rguments ould be d he had erfield, and that stated, gher in garages Lm stated the same on would singles. Heights d handle asked if issioner ted that bury his j ect was the City f housing 7n dollar ks. He to the :he park the City Planning Consultant Howard Dahlgrei that the densities in the ar, determined in the South East Area that as part of this plan traffic sti been done. He stated the road sy handle the capacity quite easily. F that this is residential use only, no business or industrial uses in tI The traffic problems are within the of Mendota Heights Road, he state occupancy rate will be low for this not as high as an expansive singl home, he stated. Commissioner Dwyer stated that the study did not account for, or coni the use generated by the softball Dick Putnam asked if the City was pl; have region -wide softball ga Kensington, that his impression of tl the softball fields was -for City leaf without lights. Planning Consultant stated that he did not feel # approximately 40 cars generated by a game would tax the capacity of designed to handle 10,000 trips per count of 5,000 trips per day is mor( he stated. He stated he didn't belie would be major problem. Commission( asked .,,him if he was saying the: problem. Dahlgren responded that problem would be with the inter Duggan queried if the City would acquire land to improve the inte Public Works Director Danielson r no, there was plenty of right -of -Way commissioner Duggan stated that the 9,000 trips per day in the South Plan will tax the capacity of the stated that the Comprehensive Plan to guide land use in the City and tr either a plan and policy or not a policy. He stated it should be f not. The document was submitted t Council and approved. As part approval process, in 1985, the Me' stated that Mendota Height accommodated 1,100 additional un asked, with all the new development Copperfield, Kensington, Shaughnes 5 stated a were lan and lies had tem can a stated .here is .s area. rapacity The )roj ect, family traffic emplate, f fields. nning to yes at e use of ue only, Dahlgren ;iat the softball a road day. A likely, ve there r Duggan e is a :he only section. have to section. sponded, 8,000 to 3ast Area road. He was used at it was plan and Llowed or the Met of the . Council could ts. He s such as sy, Colon and others if this figure of 1,100 1 been reached. He felt that we had this number, especially with the 5 being proposed in Kensington. He a amending the Comprehensive Plan, setting a precedent that allows ever a development to come in and as: rezoning to a higher density. He stz the Planning Commission's charge t the guidelines of the Comprehensive I apply. Also, he stated, the Commission must look at the Compi Plan and the breakneck speed of app development in Mendota Heights. 7 zits had :xceeded 3 units ,ked, by are we me with for a :ed that follow .an must ?lanning shensive oval of Kevin Clark stated that their purpos tonight was to replace a developers agreem nt that currently allows us a much greater density. Commissioner Duggan said let's go ba k to the Comprehensive Plan. Dick Putnam st ted that under the existing agreement between the City and the developer, it is either P an A or Plan B. Chairman Morson stated that this isgoing to be a busy area of town and that he emembers Riley's 3 -story,' 75 unit buildings that had been proposed for the same parcel. Chairman Morson stated that Commissioners ha to get it out of our minds that we can go back and start the South East Area Plan all over again.' He stated this was the best project that he had seen for this area and the issue was not a discussion of land use but that the task before them was to look at t e sketch plan, recognize what is going in here and make a decision. Commissioner rebsbach replied that the Commission shouldn' have to feel we don't have the right to s y yes or no. Chairman Morson stated our task t night is consideration of a sketch plan. He stated he did not call a special meeting to rehash all those old issues from 1985. Commissioner Anderson stated that here were two options. He stated that the Planning Commission is an advisory body an that he felt there was no rational or legal basis for turning down the project. He al so stated that if we don't like the density there is nothing to stop us from stating alerting City Council to taking a ha at it. He stated a protest vote realistic and that meaningful recomm should be within the confines guidelines set forth in City po within the proposal. Commissioner Duggan pointed out another case the Planning Commis conditions and the developer came something different and Council rej He stated that the Planning Commi: more control than you think. important because available decreasing further and further, he s N :his and der look was not ndations of the icy and that in ion set in with --ted it. :ion has his was ind is ated. Commissioner Tilsen stated he ound it difficult and rushed with the confusion on the park dedication and felt this didn't allow time to focus on different a pects of the plan. Mrs. Celia Kennedy, 2567 Delaware asked what the Citizens Park Review (CPRC) -had decided since May 30. Administrator Frazell explained t] approach to ballfields, its search and its conclusion that the dedication was acceptable, and, t would " no "other" site for softbz in this parcel. Mrs. Kennedy as else is land available for this type and if Sibley and the School Dist out of this. Frazell responded thai school district is very much inte this and favors a joint ballfield listed the other sites as Mendak Highway 149/ Highway 110, and P. Road/Acacia. He mentioned that each site had c( that made acquisition difficult or e Planning Consultant Dahlgren state( City has looked at this ar extensively and should be proud of these decisions. Public hearings and it went through the Met Council for approval, the density and the t reasonable, and the parks dedi, generous. He stated that the devel largely done a very responsible Avenue, Committee City e CPRCIs Cor sites proposed at there Ll fields :ed where of thing -ict were , no, the -ested in dte . He to site, lot Knob aints sive. that the ►a quite itself on were held s process •affic are ation is opers have job of working within the system and pro the City has asked them to develop. 0 ed what Commissioner Anderson wondered if he City was ever even going to be able to de elop the land the developer was dedicating. He stated to demand more from the developer is not responsible. Commissioner Duggan stated he had a roposal. He recommended that the City should accept Plan B if the City can come up with $850,000 • for the park. Mrs. Kennedy asked a question rega ding the east property line where it borders the wetland, King and Kennedy property. She asked about park development in this area and on her property. Mr. Putnam assured her that this was not on the sketch plan and that there is no proposed development for parks on her land. He left open the optiol of this being a dedication if she opts to de elop her land sometime in the future. CLOSED HEARING Commissioner Tilsen moved to close te public hearing and Commissioner Dwyer secon ed. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 Chairman Marson asked for a motion Either to accept with qualifications or reject. Commissioner Tilsen moved to ac ept the sketch plan with the following conditions: 1. All single family lots should have 35,000 sq. ft. minimum lot requirement. 2. Exchange the northeast section of 33 townhomes for 15,000 sq. ft. single family lots. 3. Accommodate the park connection to Hagstrom- King park so that there is a direct link to trail system. 4. Petition the MnDOT for signals a Mendota Heights Road and Dodd Road before ompletion of the project. City Administrator Frazell advised the Planning Commission that they should the amendment to the Comprehensive Pll and that the first motion should be out the park as it appears Comprehensive Plan. The second motio be to approve the sketch plan wi approval contingent on the City Cou Metropolitan Council approval Comprehensive Plan amendment. kX#] rule on in first to take on the z should h final icil and >f the Commissioner Tilsen made a motion o amend the Comprehensive Plan with the incl sion of a neighborhood park as shown in F-gure 2, with no detail of- the communit park. Commissioner Koll seconded. Commissioner Anderson stated that w should condition this so that if we lose the developer we can at least still have a 25 acre park. Chairman Morson queried staff if they could condition the amendment to Centex. City Administrator Frazel-1 replied that he didn't recommend comprehensive Plan amendments specific to any developer and that the Planned Unit Development process gave the City a lot of control in guiding projects. He stated the City ordinances don't illow the City to require a 27 acre park with this amount of land. 'Chairman Morson asked if the PUD process gave this type of latitude. Anderson replied that another developer will only give 10% and that he felt Putnam was doing the City a favor. Tilsen's motion to approve the Comprehensive Plan amendment was voted on. AYES: 6 NAYS: 1 Duggan Tilsen's first motion - to approve sketch plan with listed conditions - was put back on the table. City Administrator Frazell explained State puts in semaphores only after level is present, not in anticipati He stated the City could petition t but that in all likelihood they won in until the traffic warrant Commissioner Dwyer stated that the should pay for the semaphore. Coir Tilsen responded that this was that the i traffic )n of it. ie State, t be put 5 them. leveloper nissioner not his intention. Chairman Morson and Consultant Dahlgren both replied tha encourage the State on this. 11 .anning we can Commissioner Krebsbach suggested an amendment to the motion. She was concerned about the number and size of the 16 unit condo buildings. She counted 8 sixt en unit buildings. She stated she had an interest in seeing the number of big 16 unit tuildings decreased to reduce the density. Commissioner Anderson stated these changes may not go well with the developer nd that any conditions should be articulated for City Council seeing as how the developer is under the density guidelines. Krebsbach stated it was the mass of the structure that concerned her. Commissioner Duggan agreed. M . Putnam stated that'he would like to see the Planning Commission state whether they wanted Plan C-2 or Plan C-3, not a piecemeal appro ch that includes portions of each plan th t might appeal to individual members. Planning Consultant Dahlgren warned that as you take units out of the project you should, expect to see the park dedication decline. Commissioner Krebsbach offered a mbtion to amend the motion by requiring a condition that the number of 16 unit condos be reduced. Commissioner Tilsen replied that this was acceptable. City Administrator Frazell stated that the City Ordinance or this zoning allows a 24 unit buildi g as a permitted use. Krebsbach restated h r motion and Tilsen accepted the a endment. Commissioner Duggan seconded Tilsen otion. AYES: 4 NAYS 3 Morson, Koll, Anderson The nay voters stated that they voted nay as an objection to the conditions placed on the project and that they were not voting against the plan. Mr. Putnam requested that the re, that he is not even interested in the plan with conditions recommend, Planning Commission. He stated he proceed with the recommendations an rd show roposing by the )uld not that, he ADJOURN AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 0 was going to council with his orig C-3. Sharon Koll motioned to adjourn the Tilsen seconded. .V Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assis 12 ,nal Plan meeting. t CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 27 1989 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning t was held on Tuesday, June 27, 1989 in the City Hal Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve. Chairman Morson cz meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. The following meml present: Morson, Tilsen, Krebsbach, Anderson, Dwyer Commissioner Duggan was excused. Also present were Puh Director James Danielson, Administrative Assistai Batchelder and Planning Consultant Howard Dahlgren. mmission Council led the ers were tnd Koll . lic Works t Kevin APPROVAL OF There were no minutes to approve. MINUTES CASE NO. 89-24 John Maczko, 751 Cheyenne Lane, des ribed the MACZKO VARIANCE proposed addition to his house and the variances he was requesting. Commissioner Tilsen asked Publ'c Works Director Danielson about the width of the Right -of -Way. Danielson responded that the R.O.W. is 60' and that the 15' boulevard is adequate if sidewalks are to be put in. Commissioner Anderson stated tha sympathetic to the size of the lol the applicant was proposing, howevi visited the neighborhood and had no other garages thrust out like th proposed to be, and it has a short L, Mr. Maczko replied that Cheyenne L in front of his house and that he to all his neighbors and they fell fine addition. Commissioner stated problem with the addition to the h widening of the garage, however, stated that he felt it would be aes better to extend the addition intc yard. This way there would be nc side yard variances required and make it better for resale, he st asked Mr. Maczko if he had contemoll Mr. Maczko replied that he had, ] not desirable because it would e big picture window in the rear of room, the only light they had for Commissioner Anderson stated that t expansion is appropriate k aesthetically it is better to be it he was and what r, he had seen any s one is riveway. ne curves had spoke it was a he had no use and a he also .hetically the back front or it might .ted. He .ted this. at it was iminate a :he living the room. ie idea of it that the back. Pag 2 Jun 27, 1989 Commissioner Koll stated that she thinks the neighbors will appreciate the covered storage area this expansion will provide. Commissioner Krebsbach inquired about what precedents this type of approval ould set. Commissioner .Anderson replied that the storage space eliminates an eyesore but that any precedents have already been set. Chairman Marson stated that, yes in the Friendly Hills area that precedent has been set for 20' setbacks from the fron yard to accommodate expansions and garages. Commissioner Tilsen inquired about the materials and construction. Tilsen wished to know if the addition would blend into the current structure. Mr. Maczko responded that he was matching materials and that in the long range he was going to cedar side the whole house. He stated there wo ld be no brick involved in the garage area Tilsen restated his concern that the roof and siding should match. Tilsen also stated that in Mendota Heights it is becoming co mon that larger lots don't have enough roo for the types of houses going up, and n w in the smaller lots we see the same thing appening. Commissioner Anderson stated he seeg a better alternative that is aesthetically b tter. Commissioner Dwyer moved to recommend approvAl to City Council for a 8 foot, 6 inch (8' 611) front yard setback variance and a 6 inch (611) side yard set back variance. Commissioner Koll seconded. AYES: 5 NAYS: 1 Anderson CASE NO. 89-22 Mr. Arthur Kuross, 1155 Orchard Pla e, KUROSS LOT SPLIT explained the Right -of -Way situation as it related to the request. Chairman Marson asked the Commission if there were any questions. He stated he had none. Commissioner Krebsbach moved to waive the public hearing and make a recommendation to City Council that they approve th proposed lot division. Commissioner Dwyer seconded. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 CASE NO. 89-23 CELIA'S ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Pag� 3 Jun 27, 1989 Chairman Morson opened the public haring and explained the procedures that are f llowed in a public hearing. Mr. Paul McGinley, of Paul McLagan represented Celia Paster and explaining the proposed plat at the Orchard Place and Hunter Lane. The be divided from one parcel into 1 family lots. He explained dedications. Chairman Morson stated that a lette: received from Mr. Mulvihill, the next door, about his concerns drainage and what would occur to thi if these lots are constructed i McGinley replied that swales and bE be put in if that is what is desire Commissioner Krebsbach stated that wooded lot and asked how many of were proposed to. be cut do,, construction. Mr. McGinley replie many trees as possible would be le if berms were required this would n the removal of some trees. Co Krebsbach stated that two hou: drastically alter the nature of the it doesn't remain wooded. She ii there were any buyers yet. Mr. replied one lot. Commissioner Koll stated she had ch the neighbors about his lot divis. had been okayed except for Mr. M concern about' the drainage. Co Tilsen inquired if it was reasonab rear drainage easements and also sides. Public Works Director replied that yes this would be a and that it is a City standard in platting. Mr. McGinley responded was a good recommendation. Commissioner Tilsen moved to close hearing. Commissioner Krebsbach se Commissioner Tilsen moved to approval of the preliminary plat and Sons, )egan by corner of lot would ao single the 30' had been neighbor over the drainage n. Mr. rms could :his was a the trees z during 3 that as t in, but :cessitate imissioner es would corner if quired if McGinley eked with on and it lvihillIs missioner Le to have along the Danielson good idea the final that this he public onded. recommend with the Page 4 June 27, 989 proper easements for drainage and utilities as per the City Engineer's analysis in addition to those required by City Etandards. Commissioner Anderson seconded. Commissioner Dwyer inquired if t e motion could be amended to include proper drainage and/or berming as determined by the City Engineer. Tilsen accepted this amendment. Commissioner Krebsbach wanted a coi maintain the trees and character ol She stated the record should refle< is desirable to maintain the Condit, lot and its wooded nature. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 CASE NO. 89-21 Mr. John Carl, Jr., Vice President CUP-MENDAKOTA Mendakota Country Club, explained tl COUNTRY CLUB request for a Conditional Use Per, proposed fence and sign at the ( explained the security need to pr golf course, especially from vandal: Chairman Morson asked two questio the fence goes up, who is going t the area outside the fence along (2) the area along the south s parking lot, where there are sin houses'. what is going to be done weeds `and the final constructit landscaping? Mr. Carl replied that Mendakota Co would continue to maintain the Dodd Road. Mr. Carl explained tha was presently in the process of g seeding the area along the parkir that the weeds would be removed by stated they would contineu to mai: area. He also stated that the C1 - with the neighbors to work out the concerns about the lack of landsca the south of the parking lot. He s the club had landscaped accordit approved plans in their original C Use Permit. Chairman Morson asked Mr. Carl if Country Club's intent to proceed possible to finish the phasic dition to the lot. t that it .on of the f tit for a lub. He ]tect the SM. s; (1) if E maintain Todd Road; 3e of the le family about the i of the ntry Club :ea along the Club ading and f lot and this. He taro this b had met teighbor's ing along sated that j to the ►nditional .t was the s soon as of the Page 5 June 21, 1989 landscaping. Mr. Carl stated yes it was. Commissioner Dwyer asked Mr. Carl why the need to have the security measures taken now when it has been okay with the status quo. Mr. Carl replied that, before, the old clubhouse overlooked the most obvious entrances for vehicles but that the new clubhouse is back off the road. He also stated they have had incidences with horses and snowmobiles. Dwyer asked if a five foot fence would stop anyone. Mr. Carl replied it would stop vehicles, but for pede trians it was simply a two toe hold fence. Dwyer asked if they intended to put up vines. Mr. Carl replied that they would like to do this, and that almost every .golf course i5l fenced. Dwyer stated that the fence along I-35 and Hwy. 116 was not that obtrusive. Commissioner Koll asked Mr. Carl exactly where the fence would be along Dodd Road. He replied that it would be along th property line, which is 33' from the center line. Commissioner Krebsbach asked if the fence was for insurance purposes. commissioner Anderson wondered if a natural barrier might be more appropriate than a chain 1'nk fence, which he felt would be aes hetically unpleasing along Dodd Road. Co missioner Tilsen stated he would like to see some vegetative screening proposed and that he doesn't care for a bare chain link fence. i. Mr. Carl replied that a chain link fence is not the only solution for the club. He spoke about the plantings along the 1-35 section, that more vines could be used. He described the nursery they operate and the plantings it will provide. He stated the concern about vandalism was a legitimate one arid had the potential to be serious not only to the physical resources but to the Club's ability to do business. Commissioner Tilsen asked if the Country Club would object to screening the fence. Mr. Carl replied the only objection w uld be the financial aspect. Chairman Mor on stated that he hesitated to impose too iarsh of a condition on the club. Mr. Carl explained that the intent of the nursery is to add to the plantings on the golf course and well as along the perimeter. They have a plan for 0 Page 6 June 27, 1989 doing so and any additional requirements would be tough on the budget. Commissioner Tilsen stated that i appears that both sides are after the same thing and that there was a real need for the fence, but that aesthetics were a major concern. Commissioner Krebsbach asked Mr. C rl if he had the authority to approve extra landscaping. He replied that the Board of the Club would have to approve it. Krebsbach stated she would like to see this tabled until the board could consider dditional plantings. Commissioner Anderson spoke alpout his concerns of the aesthetic appeara ce of the fence. He stated he would like to see details of the plantings, foot by foot, before they make any recommendati n to City Council. Commissioner Dwyer stated that the City had the rights to screening of the fence and that the golf course had the right to fence for security. . Chairman Morson opened the floor to questions from the audience. David Sc oon, 871 Mendakota Court,' stated he was currently the closest neighbor to the club. His major concern was the noise pollution from the exhaust fan at the club. He stated you could hear it from anywhere on Mendak to Court. ChairmAn Morson asked Mr. Carl if they planned any further screening of the fan. Mr. Carl replied no, there was an eight foot wall in place to screen. Mr. SchoonIs second concern was which he felt were too high and He wondered if they could be directed away from the neighboncc He concluded by asking if the ap being a good neighbor and that cu leverage exists to encourage the t to satisfy the neighbors and the about buffers. Commissioner Tilsen stated neighborhood's concerns were more and he felt extra efforts could better buffer the neighborhood. Hf the residents that there is no oth( than themselves. :he lights Do bright. raffled or d somehow. licant was rently the ty Council r concerns hat the .han valid e made to stated to watchdog AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Page 7 June 27 Mr. Keith Heaver, a contractor, stE attended a meeting with the Country afternoon to discuss the issues noise, and buffer. His main conce plantings along the parking lot prc and the time schedule to con plantings. A resident woman spok would like to see the plantings fj that she had just finished putting landscaping, at quite an expense buffer the property line. Commissioner Krebsbach moved to public hearing. Commissioner seconded. 1989 ted he had Club that of light, rn was the perty line Mete the that she nished and in her own , to help close the Anderson Mr. Weinzettel stated he was concIrned the sign and if it was going to be lit. about Commissioner Dwyer moved to reopen the public hearing. Commissioner Tilsen seconded. Public hearing reopened. Mr. Carl described the sign as a arved wood sign, approximately 3' by 31, unlighted, one sided and would be placed 50' back from Dodd Road and 20' back from Mendakota Drive. It would 'ibe mounted on a 6" by 6" cedar post. Mr. Carl stated the sign faces eat and that the country club would maintain th area. Mrs. Jane Mogol, Mendakota Court asked if approval of the sign could be made contingent on the country club finishing the andscaping along the parking lot bordering the single family houses on Mendakota Court. Commissioner Dwyer moved to cl se public hearing. Commissioner Tilsen seconded. Commissioner Krebsbach desired to table the approval of placing the sign on city property until the country club has a chanc to have a Board meeting. If so we shouldnclose the public hearing, she stated. AYES: 3 NAYS: 3 AYES: 4 NAYS: 2 AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Page $ June 27, 1989 Commissioner Tilsen stated if this is the case we should make a recommendation Mr. Carl can go to the Board with. Commissioner Dwyer stated that we can make recommendation to City Council while Mr. Carl goes to his board. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that the request would move forward with approval and that by virtue of closing th public hearing we lose any controls or conditions we may wish to place on this. Commissioner Anderson stated our strongest leverage is to continue the public hearing. Chairman Morson stated the motion was made and seclnded and asked for a vote. Anderson, Tilsen, Krebsbach Motion fails, Commissioner Krebsbach moved to ex end the public hearing until the fourth Tu sday in July to give the applicant a chance to go to the Country Club's Board with the plantings for the fence. Commissioner Tilsen stated he would like to add a schedule of completion of landscaping in progress with a timetable of completion. Commissioner Anderson stated he would like to see the concerns of the neighbors addressed. Commissioner Anderson seconded the motion, Morson, Dwyer' Motion carries. Planning Consultant stated that the Planning Commission could act on the sign now that it conforms to all City codes and that the only matter was the terms for placing th sign on City property. The applicant would need a variance to place the sign on City property and that City staff could work out the details on terms for liability and maintenance. Commissioner Tilsen moved to ecommend approval of variance for placing th sign on City property if an agreement can a worked out with City staff. Commissio er Koll seconded. Page 9 June 27, 1989 PLANNING The Planning Commission reviewed th proposed APPLICATIONS revised applications forms and p3,ocedures, made suggestions and accepted them. VERBAL REVIEW Public Works Director gave a verbal review of the last City Council meeting. drian lot division was approved, Foley fence was approved, Ward wetlands permit was approved, Centex was approved without the donditions placed on it by the Planning Commis ion. Commissioner Krebsbach inquired a out what kind of briefing the City Council rceived on the Centex issue. She inquired bout why weren't the minutes ready for the Council meeting and what did Council go on in making their decision. Public Works Director Danielson replied that the staff report was available and the applicant made an oral presentation. Several members st ted they saw the meeting on cable TV. Commissioner Krebsbach.-stated that there was no written summary of the meeting and that the Planning Commission was not officially represented. Commissioner Dwyer rtated he looked at the staff report provided to City Council and that it provided a history and a section by Kevin Frazell that det fled the conditions placed on our recommendation. He stated the section was silent about the rationale behind the modifications, or conditions, placed on the recommend tion. Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated that there were at least two Planning Commissioners at the City Council meeting. Commissioner Krebsbach responded that they were not present in an official capacity. Chairman Morson stated that if a Planning Commissioner is at a City Council meting, it is as a citizen and they are not fficially representing the commission. Commissioner Tilsen stated that he the Council meeting and told the C felt the decision from Planning ( was a compromise and that they h ample time to review the plan after Commission had finished with it. spoke at uncil he )mmission dn't had :he Parks Page 10 June 27, 1989 Commissioner Krebsbach stated that this was after quite a bit of discussion by the Council trying to figure out why we came up with what we did, that Council didn't seem to know what we had done. Krebsbach st ted that Dick Putnam played this for all it wits worth. Commissioner Dwyer stated that developers are coming in from the o her side of the fence and are providing so much information that you can't pick out the important information from the unnecessary. Commissioner Anderson stated that he was upset by adverse comments by City Council about the Planning Commission. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that she agreed arid wanted the record to reflect this. She stated she felt that comments in general a out the deliberations of the Planning Commission and the hour in which we made our lecisions somewhat discounted the process. Anderson stated that these comments should lie in the record. Chairman Morson inquired about the availability of the council meeting tapes. He suggested that the body should review it to see -how the comments relate to their relationship to Council. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that this was tie second Council meeting in which their deci ions had been reversed, the Duffy develop ent and Centex Krebsbach stated she would like to go on record as expressing a conc rn about how the Planning Commission's re orts are dealt with by City Council. Commissioner Dwyer wanted the r cord to reflect that the bleachers at the new City Hall ballfield are located da- gerously because thrown balls are coming r ght into bleachers. Dwyer stated that there should be an extension of the fence to prote t people in the bleachers. Jim Danielson suggested moving the bleachers behind the backstop. ADJOURN Commissioner Tilsen moved to adjourn. Commissioner Koll seconded. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 9:20 p.m. Kevin Batchelde Administrative Assistant CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TREASURER'S REPORT, JUNE 1989 BALANCE DAKOTA COUNTY STATE BANK Checking Account 5% $ 78,861.94 Savings Account 5 1/2 479.38 C.D. Repo 4/5 7.9% -0- 0 79,341.32 Collateral - Bonds 315,000.00 Gov't. Guar. 100,000.00 200,000.00 CHEROKEE STATE BANK C.D. due 9/11/89 $ 350,000.00 @ 9.75% Savings Cert. 8/28/89 13.952.59 @ 8.55% 363,952.59 Collateral - Bonds 700,000.00 Gov't. Guar. 100,000.00 U.S. Treasury Bills July 6, 1989 $ 928,897.50 7.90 (1mm) ' 928,897.50 $ 615,000�. � Value 6/30/8 E U.S. Treasury Money Mkt. $ 800,000.00 (965,000.00) Fund (9.42) Gov't, SECURITIES FUND 1,200,000.00 (1,535,000.00) (1( TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: 3,372,191.41 Funds Available 6/30/88 2,738,000.00 Funds Available 12/31/88 5,273,390.77 Increased balance primarily due to increases in G.F. TI District, Engineering Fund. Rates, Money Market June 30 Bank 7.50 Fid. 8.96 LES:kkb 7/7/89 EE m 1.7%) TO: Mayor, City Council, and Cit It r FROM: Paul R. Berg, Code Enforc nt Officer SUBJECT: Building Activity Report for June, 1989 CURRENT MONTH MEMO Year to Date - 1989 Date: June 28, 1989 Year to Dat _ 1988 BUILDING PERMITS: No. Valuation Fee Collected 1 No. _ Valuation Fee Collected I No. Valuation I SFD 13 2,159,383.00 18,826.23 I 1 40 6,319,425.00 I 55,811.05 1 59 8,886,782.51 APT 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ( 0 0 TOWNHOUSE 10 819,460.00 6,133.04 ( 15 1,640,695.00 13,174.25 1 0 0 CONDO 0 0 0 7 1,500,000.00 7,490.18 1 0 0 MISC. 33 285,972.00 5,429.48 1 102 836,461.00 15,530.02 1101 729,216.31 C/I 6 225,035.00 2,719.21 1 18 1,680,008.00 12,680.38 I 26 2,916,941.00 ....................•---------------•--+--•---•-----••-•-----------------------+--------------......... Sub Total 62 $3,489,850.00 $33,107.96 1 182 I $11,976,589.00 $104,685.88 1 I 186 $12,532,939.82 PERMITS: 1 1 Ptumbing 29 743.00 ( 1 71 I 1,937.00 I 67 Water 33, 165.00 1 67 335.00 1 65 Sewer 29 4 507.50 1 51 892.50 1 50 Heat, AC, b e Collected 79,005.53 0 0 0 12,005.93 17,416.98 $108,428.44 1,749.00 325.00 875.00 Gas 30 1,949.50 ( 86 8,748.50 ( 94 9,533.00 d5%;, ....................................•--+....-•--- ...-----------------------+- - --------•------- Sub Total 121 3,365.00 1 275 $11,913.00 1 276 $12,482.00 LICENSING: 36 900.00 1 375 9,375.00 1 3759,375.00 ................................................. ..............................•+----................ ................ Total 219 $3,489,850.00 $37,372.96 1 832 $11,976,589.00 $125,973.88 1 837 $12,532,939.82 $130,285.44 NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan and valuation amounts. ick fee, LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON JULY 11, 1989 Concrete License:, Peter Klatte Brick & Stone Construction Excavating Licenses: Gary Bobcat Service Kenealey Co., Inc. St. Paul Utilities, Inc. Gas Piping Licenses: Genz -Ryan Plumbing & Heating Co. Harris Mechanical Hinding Company Innovative Heating & Air, Inc. Midwestern Mechanical Corp. General Contractors Licenses: Advent Construction Co., Inc. Decks Plus HBS Construction, Inc. J & L Schwieters Construction, Inc. Linert Construction Minnesota Exteriors, Inc. Sawhorse Designers & Builders Thomas Conway Contractor Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses: Gen -Ryan Plumbing & Heating Co. Innovative Heating & Air, Inc. 7 Jul 1989 Fri 8:15 AM Temp. J.., -Check 41 . Number Vendor Name --------D.ep-t-lOrAdm--J)Bpt-SD--Rd-&- Bridge Claims List 15-Engr 60-Utilties Page 1 City of Mendota Hg ei Z&89 20 -Police 70 -Parks h s 30 -Fire 80 -Planning 40 -CEO 90 -Animal Control --85-Recycling- Account Code Comments Amount T 4 1 A T & T 05-4210-105-15 63 I A T & T 01-4210-030-30 to, 4 -Totals- Temp --- Qheq8--N-uYdb-!Rn.- : 11 1,41 Temp Check Number 2 2 Earl F Anderson & Assoc 01-4420-050-50 si Totals Temp Check Number L , !Lff-emp-Cb.eck 3.- 3 AT&T 3 AT &T 3 AT&T 12 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 4 33 4 d dr -i an 34 — 3s! 4 Temp Check Number 5 signs 01-4210-050-50 Jul Svc 15-4210-060-60 Jul Svc 01-4210-070-70 end qr 93 5 American Heat 01-4402-030-30 j42 Totals Temp Check Number 5 'E--Temp-Check-N-umber 4(, 10.52 10.53 8.83 40.41 18. 00 Trng tapes 650.00 6 Annandale Contr Inc 47-4460-852-00 pymt 7 87-5 14,750.71 14,750.71 Totals Temp Check Number 6 Temp Check Number 7 7 350. 00 7 Id calls 0.75 1 d calls 4.03 Id calls----._-__---- alls------ -.---_ _-___ 1. 3J _____—__ 8.15 8. 15 signs 01-4210-050-50 Jul Svc 15-4210-060-60 Jul Svc 01-4210-070-70 end qr 93 5 American Heat 01-4402-030-30 j42 Totals Temp Check Number 5 'E--Temp-Check-N-umber 4(, 10.52 10.53 8.83 40.41 18. 00 Trng tapes 650.00 6 Annandale Contr Inc 47-4460-852-00 pymt 7 87-5 14,750.71 14,750.71 Totals Temp Check Number 6 Temp Check Number 7 7 350. 00 7 10 Bills Guns Shop 01-4305-020-20 amIAO Totals Temp Check Number 10 Temp Check Number 11 11 Battery & Tire Warehouse 01-4330-490-50 battery 43.00 28.43 pl! ;:321 11 Claims List 28. 43 7 Jul 1989 11 Page Fri 8:15 AM City of Mendota Heights Temp Check Number 12 Temp. 12 Kevin Batchelder 01-4400-110-10 reimb mtP expense_ 13.00 P7, I I ----_ Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount 13.00 8 Donn Anderson 01-4410-020-20 re'imb expense 64.99 7I 42, Temp Check Number 13 8 13 Biffs Inc 01-4200-610-70 64.99 392.00 _Totals Check Number _j@rOp 392.00 Temp Check Number 9 Totals Temp Check Number 13 Temp Check Number 14 01-4305-050-50 part ---3.99 1131--g B & J Auto SUpplyv, 141 9 B & J Auto Supply, 01-4330-460-30 parts 12.03 01-4425-310-50 May Svc =4305-OSO-50 part__ 9.70 08-4425-000-00M 27 203.41 25.72 Totals Temp Check Number 85.14 42 119: 74 iss Totals Temp Check Number .2c! Temp Check Number 10 10 Bills Guns Shop 01-4305-020-20 amIAO Totals Temp Check Number 10 Temp Check Number 11 11 Battery & Tire Warehouse 01-4330-490-50 battery 43.00 28.43 pl! ;:321 11 28. 43 Totals Temp Check Number 11 Temp Check Number 12 12 Kevin Batchelder 01-4400-110-10 reimb mtP expense_ 13.00 P7, I I ----_ as 12 13.00 Tota is _Tegip _gheck _Number 12 42, Temp Check Number 13 13 Biffs Inc 01-4200-610-70 July rent 392.00 441 392.00 Totals Temp Check Number 13 Temp Check Number 14 11.9 so! 14 Board of Water Commissioners 01-4425-310-50 May Svc 20.19 .14 Board of Water Commissioners 08-4425-000-00M Svc 203.41 14 Board of Water Commissioners '---May Svc 85.14 42 74 iss Totals Temp Check Number 14 T-- rh--U W—k— 7 Jul 1989 Claims List Fri 8:15 AM City of Mendota Heights ,-2emp_Gheck_.Number _ __.,• 5-. a - Temp. 3 -_Check-__.-. _- _._-. _.�__----__a._ _____-_ ___ _y_._.�_•-------___.--_- --_-_._� ____.-. - ` Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments __..-15_City_Aotor-_Supply_____._-_ _ 01.-4330_-=A_45_40.-__-_.__- _ ___� parts .__-_ _ - _-_-• 7i- 15 City Motor Supply 01-4330-440-20 parts �i 15 City Motor Supply 01-4330-440-20 parts 2203 01.-4330-490-50--.-----••-__---___-_-mise_parts_-___ �__ _. i 15 City Motor Supply 01-4330-440-20 parts 2203 15 City Motor Supply 01-4330-440-20 credit parts 2244 -_- 13i 15 City Motor Supply 01-4330-440-20 misc parts 15 City Motor Supply 01-4330-445-40 part 'e 135 Totals Temp Check Number 15 .a Temp Check Number 16 �1 ""I Temp Check Number 17 1271 17 Communications Center 01-4330-440-20 Totals Temp Check Number 3z; i� ..Setnp_Che¢k_Nurnber 1. 18 Continental Safety Eq 36! 17 01-4400-150-30 371 18 1 '38i Totals Temp Check Number 18 -� Temp Check Number ail 19 Creative Colors _-1554330-490-60 _3 _- 19 LC Temp Check Number 20 .LQ a - 20 Dakota County Abstract — 16-4473-000-00 20 _ -- Totals Temp Check Number 20 _ np Check Number 21 Dennis Delmont 01-4415-020-20 -_-- spkr rprs splys Kaiser Fuge 3 _.___.�.-. -- -• Amount 21116-___. 43.71 7S.92 _20. 75._ 83. 77 50. 73cr �.__ _ __ ___73.,,47 -_ .__... __. _ _ ___.___.-- • -- 2#. 16 5.05 _-297. 26 --- - •-- -- - - - 2.61. 2.61 rnisc splys _97:21 - Page 1 _ title searches SgIasmais 259. 00 July allow 7 Jul 198,j Claims List Fri 8:15 AM City of Mendota Heights 21 2 Temp. Totals Temp Check Number 25 Kevin J Halliday Treas MCFDA 05-4404-105-15 ,I.,. Check 1 Number Vendor Name Account Code 7 Tota .LEi-Temp_ Check Number 21 1311 Temp Check Number 22 32. !39! 22 Klayton Eckles 05-4415-105-15 40; e6 H-& L Remodeling 01-3315 Totals Temp Check Number 22 141 Totals Temp Check Number 26 23 Fisher Scientific 01-4305-020-20 27 Hdwe Hank 01-4330-490-70 23 ?°' Totals Temp Check Number 23 Totals Temp Check Number 27 Temp Check Number 24 124 24 Kevin Frazell 01-4415-110-10 125 24 Kevin Frazell 011-4400-110-10 27i 1 48 Totals Temp Check Number 25 Kevin J Halliday Treas MCFDA 05-4404-105-15 ,I.,. 25 1 Totals Temp Check Number 25 36) 1311 Temp Check Number 32. !39! 26 H & L Remodeling 01-3250 40; e6 H-& L Remodeling 01-3315 52 Totals Temp Check Number 26 27 Hdwe Hank 01-4330-490-70 27 Totals Temp Check Number 27 53 Temp Check Number 28 Comments mise mileage lab coat Page 4 Amount 46.56 46. 56__ 34.76 :77= 34.76 Julyallow---_175.00 reimb expense 19.28 _194. 28 mbrshp Ward rfd dup _I_pRrmitfee—_—___Y frd dupl permit fee mise parts 25. 00 25.00 9.71 28 Halla Nursery_____ 51-4460-861-00 remove trees 88-4 1.-06.28 28 1,206.28 28 / r Jul 1989 Claims List Fri 8:15 m* City or Mendota Heights -__remp-oheox'Number-- Temp. ' Number vendor Name . Account ouue Comments es Home Lumber misc snzys ___------------ �_--'------------------' -^--'-'--'-------- -------� Tutaxs Temp, Check Number ae :z. ow 1 o a o 01-4400-150-30' vaz matzs conr am - Totals Temp Check Number 30 ``. Temp Check Number 31 w R--'R_cL_-'_---__ _ -__-'_��em7e�___--__- '-__- --'_- -__'a,��o�paYcpz-I-__-_---_'_-_-_ =z ox z c m n e c 01-4134-110-10 6/30 payroll z^! ' ,��'��'��' 125 Totals Temp Check Number a/ 29 32 Inver Grove Ford 01-4330-490-50 parts 32 Totals Temp Check Number 32 =l Temp Check Number 33 135 '------'-----'--'--- nmuvnt 38'58 ~° .p ------------'- 45.00 45.00 ^5'mm __tm7,7m---_---- � ----------'' ea'55 7.52 7.52 01-4335-315-30 Svc_�L 32 33 i3q Tota �aa'mm '°. Temp Check Number 34 34 F F Jedlicxu Inc � Totals Temp, Check Number qg 35 Johnny Masonry Inc � 35 Totals Temp, Check Number .o Temp Check Number 36 49-4460-654-00 �a 10-4460-000-00 Bench/slabs Ball park as 28,055.7* gaa'mm eaa'mm ______ mti-quP-_oi-t;at f�_cmrre--_' '--'-- 7 Jul 1989 Fri 8:15 AM Ternp Check_ Number __ _36 ! i Temp. - Check Claims List City of Mendota Heights Number Vendor Name Account Code 36 James Kilj?Ltr_q— 01-4415-030-30 7 al 72 Totals Check Tfunp NILr4jzi��.r. --_ acs :11 Temp Check Number 37 113! 37 Paul Kaiser 01-4268-150-30 37 Paul Kaiser 01-4415-030-30 74 Totals Temp Check Number 37 Comment s mileaae state conv Jun Svc Jun mileage Temp Check Number 38 21i 3 SvLI —.�Kriu:tson Rubbish Service 38 , Totals Temp Check Number 38 125:, Temp Check Number 39 Page 6 Amount 108. OL71 447.15 1,033.50 8.40 1,041.90 - - 1.13. 'S; 39 Thomas Knuth project mileage 6.40 ,23 i i 39 Thomas Knuth 43-44I5-847-00 project mileage 45.84 13Ci 39 Thomas Knuth 50-4415-655-00 project miles 28.80 i311 39 Thomas Knuth 58-4415-863-00 project mileage 42.72 1:32. 39 Thomas Knuth 68-4415-665-00 project mileage 40.56 L -L' 0.00 10.00—_-__-- I 234 176.32 Totals Temp Check Number 39 371 i 36 Temp Check Number 40 139. 40 Kustom Electronics 01-4330-440-20 radio rprs 150.58 Totals Temp Check Number 40 41 L E L S 01-2075 41 Totals Temp Check Number 41 July dues 150.58 175. 50 52i Temp Check Number 42 42 Lake Country Chppter ---,20. 44---.- 42 Lake Country Chapter 6i-4304 - 0-70 misc splys 28.50 48. 94 | / Jul 1989 Claims List Fri 8: 15 nm City of Mendota Heights -_-jewp-�C^ -------------------'----'-------�---- � Temp. " Number Vendor Name Account Code comments ' --_-'rpcs ea_zs_-_ ' *3 Lakeland F mr m�-�o�m *a Ford - m-om rprs aa Is .o| a �----''------------ Totals Temp Check Number 43 44 !`�� ---- ---'--------------------'--------------'-------- 44 Land Care sn co, 01-*3mS-070-70 parts .` 44 Totals Temp Check Number 44 r � emp o��cx Number .,, 2.11_��-�e�-:4��wm-wm__--____. ., _- .a2� 45 Temp Check Number *a +aJohn macz/m ^s John waczxo 9e Totals Temp Check Number 01-4400-030-30 01 -*41S-030-30 46 _ reimu state fire conv exp Mileage exp St fire conv � I , Temp Check Number 47 704.40 JxJy_p'gm______'__'-_-__-____-�,��_�_—___' July prem 410.00 July prem 89+.85 erem !HL -47 Med Centers H P 01-2074 1371 47 Med Centers H P 47 Med Centers H P 05-4131-105-15 �Zsi 1411 47 Med Centers H P 01-4131-050-50 ;42'; 47 Med Centers H P 15-4131-060-60 1431 47 Med Centers H P 01-4131-070-70 �otals Terjip Check Number 47 Di 48 merles Construction 48 Merles Constructio, Temp Check Number m1-3u5m 01-3315 Page r - --------------- — Amount 159.94 ------ -----------'------- 23.74 23. 74 -760.50 760.50 July Orem July prem July prem 704.40 JxJy_p'gm______'__'-_-__-____-�,��_�_—___' July prem 410.00 July prem 89+.85 erem 190.45 July prem 294. 40 rfd perm sora e22.75 � 228.33 13,Soo. mm 7 Jul 198'v Fri 8: 15 AM _,__Temp_ Ch, eckNum-ber. Temp. Check Number Vendor Na. Claims List City of Mendota Heights Recount -Code Comments 52 Minn Cellular Tele Co 01-42 Totals Temp Check Number 52 ber Jun svc Jun Svc Page 8 Amount 2,796.08cr 43,983.96 31.00 31.00 31. 00 31.00 31. 00 ----245.00 307.00 139.00 846.00 4.95 11.55 49 15-3615 i mber •4C 49 Metro Waste Control 15-4449-060-60 July Svc of 49 Metro Waste Control 17-3575 July Svc 196 27.20 Totals Temp Check Number 49 51 Miller Printing 01-4220-130-10 audit rpt covers 51 Miller Printing 52 Minn Cellular Tele Co 01-42 Totals Temp Check Number 52 ber Jun svc Jun Svc Page 8 Amount 2,796.08cr 43,983.96 31.00 31.00 31. 00 31.00 31. 00 ----245.00 307.00 139.00 846.00 4.95 11.55 .50_M!� dwest Wirq 01-2074 Jul pre, i mber •4C so 01-4131-020-205- 10 53 Minn Mutual Life Ins m Check Number 1.70 159 27.20 Temp Check Number 51 53 51 Miller Printing 01-4220-130-10 audit rpt covers 51 Miller Printing 05-4220-130-15 audit rpt covers Miller Printing 15-4220-1301-60 audit rpt covers 51 Miller Printing 14-4220-130-00 audit rpt covers 51 Miller Printing 16-4220-130-00 audit rpt covers 17 i- 51 Miller ng bldg -permit forms :;8! 51 Miller Printing 01-4300-040-40 bldg permit forms 1:29i 51 Miller Printing 01-4300-040-40 insp cards 408 Totals Temp Check Number 51 Tersip Check Number 52 52 Minn Cellular Tele Co 01-42 Totals Temp Check Number 52 ber Jun svc Jun Svc Page 8 Amount 2,796.08cr 43,983.96 31.00 31.00 31. 00 31.00 31. 00 ----245.00 307.00 139.00 846.00 4.95 11.55 LI! Temp Check Number 54 521 ir-l! 54 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-2074 Jul prem 267.32 :C.-. 54 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-4131-110-10 Jul Prem 245.70 iL5 ' ---- 54 Minnesota Benefit Assn 05-41:31-10i1T July prem 320.55 53 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-2074 Jul pre, 20.40 •4C -Ins 01-4131-020-205- 10 53 Minn Mutual Life Ins 1t413 -070-1- 1 1.70 159 27.20 Totals Temp Check Number 53 LI! Temp Check Number 54 521 ir-l! 54 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-2074 Jul prem 267.32 :C.-. 54 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-4131-110-10 Jul Prem 245.70 iL5 ' ---- 54 Minnesota Benefit Assn 05-41:31-10i1T July prem 320.55 !' 7 Jul 1989 - -- --. -..----`-----T Claims List Fri 8;15 AM City of Mendota Heights !__-Temp-Check_..Nuraber-_...__-.-- -54 _._._. _______ -__-__ ___.____.------_-, _•- -_._ =' Temp. ----- Number Vendor Name Account Code 1.-4131 7.0 P-S0L �'; 54 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-4131-050-50 -- - - r8i 54 Minnesota Benefit Assn 15-4131-060-60 "� 378 "= Totals Tergp Check Number 54 t4 Temp Check Number 55 0s Comments Pace 9 Amount_-.___._—_.__._� ----- Jul prem 112.27 Jul prem 12.85 1, 794. 73 Temp Check Number 59 59 Oxygen Service Co 01-4305-050-50, 59 Oxygen Service Co 01-4305-030-30 118_-�- Totals Temp Check Number 59 lss� Temp Check Number 60 F.3 60 P C Express -_- 15-4620-060-60 155f 60 P C Express ^01-4600-110-10 ais med oxy 47.18 55.93 _ T _ Express Xt------1, 2238.00 Microsoft mouse 121.00 359. 00 55 Mn Dept Public Safety 01-4200-610-20 2nd qtr conn chg 150.00 -'- 15 Totals Temp Check Number 55 ---�_-_- r_'.._J�InP__Check__..N_iunbe� 31 ^ 56 Natl Fire Protection 01-4402-030-30 renewal 60.00 4 I261 56 60.00 -` Totals Temp Check Number 56 1=r, 1281 Check Number 57 _Temp '29i 12°? 5 - J hn-Ltes}ka-- 57 John Neska Qt.la4430 01-4415-030-30 -- _ reirnb ex_p st fire cony _159. 5!0 _ -� 110.16 (r4 mileage st fire conv , i 114 _ _ 134 Totals Temp Check Number 57 ------------ ----_..- ___-._-_____ =3�( 176! Temp Check Number 58 y__ ----- --- -_--� v ;3i 58 Oakcrest Kennels 01-42221-800-90 Jun Svc 355.00 L. 58 Oakcrest Kennels ------- ---- _ o 01-4225-800-90 _ _ ---.--_--._ - __- _- . _ . Jun svc 1, 90. 01D ;"1 116 545.00 Temp Check Number 59 59 Oxygen Service Co 01-4305-050-50, 59 Oxygen Service Co 01-4305-030-30 118_-�- Totals Temp Check Number 59 lss� Temp Check Number 60 F.3 60 P C Express -_- 15-4620-060-60 155f 60 P C Express ^01-4600-110-10 ais med oxy 47.18 55.93 _ T _ Express Xt------1, 2238.00 Microsoft mouse 121.00 359. 00 7 Jul 196,j Claims List Fri 5:15 AM City of Mendota Heights Temp Check Number 61 Temp. 2 Check Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Page 10 Amount 61 Kevin Perron 01-4415-030-30 53.52 61 53.52 2—Totals TempNumber- 61 Temp Check Number 62 62 Pyrotronics 08-4335-000-00 replacement parts 711.00 62 711.00 Totals Temp Check Number 62 jfrjip Check Number 63 M 63 S & T Office Products 01-4300-020-20 misc splys 63 Totals Temp Check Number 63 Temp Check Number 64 64chumachers Inc 01-4305-050-50 22 64 S'chmachers Inc 01-4305-050-50 'Y; 1: Totals Temp Check Number Jun svc 99.90 Jun Svc 163.75 Jun Tem _-bRck \Iq 65 svc 77. 70 Jun Svc 65 L E Shaughnessy Jr 01-4220-132-10 1�61 65 L E Shauahnessy Jr 05-4220-132-15 V -21-4220-132--00— :373 r 65 L E Shaughnessy Jr -3pf 65 L E Shaughnessy Jr 16-4220-132-00 "9i 65 L E $bLaunhnep� 03-4220-132-00 eei 65 L E Shaughnessy Jr .41! 65 L E Shaughnessy'Jr 15-4220-132-60 !42; --- 455 Totals Temp Check Number 65 6.79 6.79 misc splys 50.00 Jun svc 1,154.40 Jun svc 99.90 Jun Svc 163.75 Jun Svc 246.95 Jun svc 77. 70 Jun Svc 826.95 Jun svc 205.375 2,775.00 55 i b -g�,tp st fire cony Temp Check Number 66 66 J L Shieley—Co 01-4422-070-70 rec rock 826.72 66 J L Shieley Co 01-4422-070-70 rec rock 130.87 66 J L Shieley Co 01-4422-050-50 crse sand 1.90 959. 49 198 ;53; Totals Temp Check Number 66 I i Temp Check Number 67 55 i b -g�,tp st fire cony i 7 Jul 198-1 Claims List City of Mendota Heights Page 11 c Temp. �r-� - --'-----------'----'----'----'-------'---------' - -- ------- -----'---------------�'----�------ Number Vendor Name Account Code comments Amount ~1 134 *31.e4 L?,—_-.-zo-t.azs_remp-u*eck-wvrnbez_---_-__.-a7_-'__--'____-__-___' 1:0: \, Temp Check Number aa .`� i. -eja/Sun Newspapers --------------'-'---------'------------------------' " Totals Temp Check Number 66 ,2~ay Turf products 01-4330-490-70 parts ` 33.07*e0-:70 marts- �~| Temp Check Number 70 in 15.57 eo'�a �e7'ea_______ � 213.26 ---------------'---'------ r] � nn u y west Communications 01-4e10-030-30 Jul s"c 110.96 -1 29i nn u o west Communications 01-4e10-050-50 Jul Svc 35'74 Pol ar, 15-4210-060-60 Jul Svc 35.74 121 1 70 U S West Communications 01-4210-070-70' Jul Svc 35.75' ___ Totals Temp Check Number rm 23: 71 United Ceniral Trustee 01-2071 ;29: 7L-QIjLitg-d Central Tnuskgt�_' -020-20 71 United Central Trustee _At- 01-4132-050-50 71 United Central Trustee 01-4132-070-70 284 Totals Temp Check Number 71 � /emn UMeok mumuer po _ 72 Temp Check Number 73 Jul prem Jul p Jul prem Jul prem 170-88 _43'93__ 1a-oo 1y'4/ 55, 73 Univ of Wisconsin 01-4400-020-20 regr L Bridger 350.00 UI 7! 73 350.00 7 Jul 15 -- Fri 8:15 AM Temp Check Number 74 Temp. I:, Check Claims List City of Mendota Heights Page 12 Comments Araq Firework safety message 189.00 189.00 189.00 Jul prem 150.50 6279 MANUAL CHECKS Grand Total 12235 1,466.78 Dakota County Bank Fisepaytoll w/h 12266 15,981.58 City M.H. Payroll a/c Fire net payroll 199,47 -76. 08 r— Kullarider —mileaae expense Number Vendor Name Account Code 12239 !271 1724 f281 74 W M I M 01-4490-020-20 12242 122-43- 35,057.44 *Cijzy'M.H. Payroll a/c 74 163,500.00' Winthrop & Weifistine 12245 Totals Check Number 74 ;34! ,Temp 16.65 Quick Silver Express ttl Temp Check Number 75 122-54- Vl 75 Western Life Ins 01-4132-031-30 12256-260 —6.,325-43- PERA- ----6/-l6--payxo11 - -------------------- 1296-1 4W 75— 875.00 12263 Totals Temp Check Number 75 Page 12 Comments Araq Firework safety message 189.00 189.00 189.00 Jul prem 150.50 6279 MANUAL CHECKS Grand Total 12235 1,466.78 Dakota County Bank Fisepaytoll w/h 12266 15,981.58 City M.H. Payroll a/c Fire net payroll 199,47 -76. 08 r— Kullarider —mileaae expense ;r„ 3,875.32' Reisinger*Exc 12238 26 12239 !271 1724 f281 12241 875.00 12242 122-43- 35,057.44 *Cijzy'M.H. Payroll a/c 12244 163,500.00' Winthrop & Weifistine 12245 --150-00—SoftbaU-umpires* ;34! 3-2251 16.65 Quick Silver Express 12253 --22. 80-LRoacl-Runaer* 122-54- 60.00 Window Whse 12255 75.00 Softball umpires 12256-260 —6.,325-43- PERA- ----6/-l6--payxo11 - -------------------- 1296-1 4W 12262 875.00 12263 —3,034-20—SC I 17264- 143! 1 12265 14-1 12266 ;r„ 3,875.32' Reisinger*Exc 86-16 6,922.95 PERA 6/2 payroll —.3,147-.Zo--C.c>mmisstoner-.of-My-e.nia--'$ w 11,112.22 Dakota County Bank 6/16 w/h 875.00 6/16 payroll deductions 35,057.44 *Cijzy'M.H. Payroll a/c net payroll 6/16 163,500.00' Winthrop & Weifistine Tousignant properties --150-00—SoftbaU-umpires* 700.00 Rx#*tmx Dakota County Bank Police dept 16.65 Quick Silver Express dely svc --22. 80-LRoacl-Runaer* .1 60.00 Window Whse balance for replacing window 75.00 Softball umpires —6.,325-43- PERA- ----6/-l6--payxo11 11,445.38 Dakota County Bank 6/30 w/h 875.00 6/30 payroll deductions —3,034-20—SC I 36,175.16 City M.H. Payroll a/c 6/30 bet payroll 500.00 Kathryb & James McCullough earnet mpney 1805 Delaware 27._26 _Diane ward--expense-xpi- ursemenLt-- 304,456.65 G.T. 420,074.81 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TO: Mayor, City Council and FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Paster Subdivision Case No. 89-23 MEMO July 6, 1989 City —rAor and Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their Junq meeting to consider an application from Mr. Paul McGinley to plat a o lot subdivision located in the southeast corner of Orchard Place and e Hun n r Lane e and owned by Celia Paster. The Planning Commission had received a 1 tter from Mr. Art Mulvihill, abutting landowner to the east, expressing aconcern about drainage. The Planning Commission discussed the concern with he applicant and he agreed to plat a wider drainage easement along the ast property line to be able to hold the drainage totally within the new y platted lots. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the preliminary plat conditioned on the City Engineer determination of proper drainage and inclusion of an easement for drainage and utilities alo ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the Planning Commission recomm ndation they should pass a motion approving the preliminary plat. I CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Applicant Name: McGinley Paul Case No. - I) - Date of Application Fee Paid 35 ' 3 0 , J. 511 Last First Initial Address: 233 Dakota Ave,. West St. Paul MN 155118 -Number & Street city State Zip v Telephone Number: 457-3645 Owner Name: Paster Celia N. LN First Initial C o Edward Paster. Address,: 2227 University Ave. *St. Paul MN 5114 Number & Street City State Zip Street Location of Property in Question: SE corner Orchard Place and Hunter Lane Legal Description of Property: The west one-half of the north 2,00 -acres of the west .501fpet o the east 1369.98 feet of the south 2425.50 feet of the Norteast Quarter of Section 27,, T.28N., R.23W., Dakota Countv, Minn soca. Type of Request: Rezoning Variance Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D Minor.Conditional Use Permit X Subdivision Approval Plan Approval Wetlands Permit Other Applicable City Ordinance Number 301 Section All Present Zoning of Property; R-1 Present Use "of Property: Vacant Proposed Zoning of Property.- Same Proposed Use, of Property:, !2 single family lots Number of people intended;to live or work on premises! 2 families I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the material are true. -Signature of Appl-icanliox' June 8., 1989 Date Received by (title) ditional NOTE: The following plans shall be drawn and attached to this appliction: 'A. Applications involving a -Variance shall submit the following plani Date Received Initial 1. Site Development Plan -2.'* Dimension Plan 3. Landscape Plan 4. Grading Plan B. Applications involving a Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit or Subd vision shall submit the following: 1. Sketch Plan 2. Abstract6rs Certificate,-.. (If the subdivision involves cutting of existing parcel into two r more lots). C. Applications involving a Wetlands Permit shall submit.the followin: 1. A full & adequate description,of all phases of the operation Qor 3roposed physical changes. 2. A topographic map of the area. Contour intervals shall be drawn at two (2) foot intervals at a horizontal scale of 1" - 1,000' or larger. 3. A detailed site plan of the proposal showing proposed drainage, grading & landscaping G. A site design map showing the location of existing and future man-ade features M within the site and,to a distance of five hundred (500) feet surr 0 nding the site. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: KEVIN L. BATCHELDER, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT." K3 SUBJECT: Celials Addition Subdivision Case No. 89-23 DATE: June 22, 1989 DISCUSSION Paul McGinley, a surveyor with Paul R. MeLagan and Sons, i representing Ms. Celia Paster on a proposed subdivision of her lot. Ms. Paster owns a large unplatted lot of land on the southeast corner of Hunter Lane and Orchard Place. Sh wishes to create two lots on the parcel. 1. There is ample area available to subdivide the lot and cre to two new lots that meet or exceed all ordinance requirement The land is currently unplatted, therefore the platting procedure must be completed with a public hearing. It Mr. Art Mulvihill has expressed concern to the City regarding the flow of water off the subject property towards his property which is adjacent to the east. Mr. Mulvihill wi 1 not be able to attend the meeting and has submitted the attached letter. This subdivision, if approved, will mean a $600 dedicationto the Parks Fund. ACTION REQUIRED I Conduct a public hearing, and make a recommendation to Ciy Council on the proposed subdivision. t KLB: j ak PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 27 June 1989 89-23 Paul McGinley Southeast Corner of Orcl Place and Hunter Lane sketch) Approval of Subdivision 1. Paul McGinley is a surveyor who proposes the division of land for elia Paster, who owns a corner parcel that she proposes to divide intotwo buildable single-family lots. 2. You will note from the attached preliminary plat (called C lia's Addition) that the two single-family lots fronting on Hunter Lane ould each have a frontage of approximately 110 feet. The depth of the proposed parcels will be 157.25 feet. Thus, the northerly lot will have an area of 17,430 square feet, and the southerly most lot will hav an area of 17,428 square feet. The minimum lot size is 15,000 s uare feet and the minimum lot frontage is 100 feet. Thus, the lots a ceed the minimum lot size requirements. 3. You will note on the preliminary plat drawing that the appli ation % includes a proposal to dedicate an additional 14 feet of widt for Hunter Lane and sufficient right-of-way to make Orchard Place 60 feet wide on the north side of the property. The property line, as it xists today, is slightly north of the;. existing 30 foot right-of-way for Or hard Place. Thus, the total dedication is actually slightly more than 30 feet. However, the end result is a total of 60 feet of right-of-wa for Orchard Place as required. 4. The preliminary plat includes contour lines indicating the developm two houses on the two lots with walkouts to the east. Thus, tt lots will require some fill to achieve this objective. It would s however, that both lots are highly desirable, exceed lot requirements, and can be developed for attractive easterly v designs. 5. It appears that the proposed division is appropriate as submitted. it of two pear, size lkout 7;4 foff f X f I I VERN^ VVI" 4 6^11"tsett rys 93 MAGI (3,x 1-4 14 L 9: C V,,;T HUNTER No LOMA s F, BLUFF 0-0-01 057 ol "4"e r 4 4010 -/I;r F;L -s 40 Z6074 A 2607 -AL 0 F:z c ) )S HILL TIN 2.2 t i 410 'X 6 O!r op A'- -,-7 /77 e- Us SUBJECT PROPERTY -+ /7-f 2& -3 Ac -74fAc 0 3 2. 08. 1 0 NORTH t SCALE 11111=200' 2 C. 4o0o -A ol f. 4 45% v it 510 896 lrj'3 0.,l rp. 02 ID CA Ac 46 ol 3 )2 010-07 0610�; - 2 ')z 91 INT ov a, 22932 4 020 03 N 030-03 0!0 W ID W11 0 Z INTER CIRCLE w 121 20 136 so tu 0-in— F- 14 2 F MALLARP-P-ROAD-4 %j �7V j .1 A 175 00 k, 240 D o/v 52 51 136 51 Z2 Z, '00 !L NTLOT A 2&079-A ol a 4.19 0 En < 5 5 .50 1.15 Q(; re %os.so V)t-L-AGr-- OF tAlE vc>-rp, 0 G E N Z 2 010-04ll L-ANC %) "10 118.6i81.7 M L-9 c -� VERONICA LA. Z G 0 7 9 C N Ito 0 \ADDITION 3 t' loo` �l I If _fy 2N /10GS .98 Its- F T v alp l I�I• •' i .i � r :i '.� ARI I,ILIN 1". MULVZFIILL ' `r C '• i Li1. 1JRCI'IOF?C) i='LACE; t5,. t. ML•:%tt.�u'r'A Far:� I c�i-€T S , MN . ,.} i 110 % ' CITY OF ME=:h1DOTA HEIGHTS ru�r,!i)1>>TA I)f. ] 1:1 I`T'a, MSI`. :} i:L:11 ri -} A"r'rm- KEVTN r), r"RA'LEL.L t 1• IN 1t1"flARD 11:1 THE CI`T'Y MEETING JCal'E 27, 1981',' PASIAIR S111,11,HVI 3IC]N OF A LUT Ai)t_`K**,r•::[,I,I.. T'CI I"HE', !Atl:-:;2'1 ':)r:' ':`IY I f1rI I'I(lr''r'1' rC! FIFhR VIE:. WILL Carr"r` C1l`]•i...]. i F�'i".t.t']1�I 1)►: 't € !€., r=F:€?t !' €''� , F(Ir,' '111!_. 111.110"OSi- (IF i - r. srt; t: MY :'{ "it'.IC r: I i€'.€ P3 THE €-_LAVATION Gr' THE 1..1JT n MY NU `?`31; .113 1 "I t'! "I I_.t.p) ;; r 1)r: 1')r: €'I1C LC]'I-'� ;I"C) THE C}TRI::.E:'1' €1%v .- Of:- '•Ium I r:! !_iljt!f. !. .: ADO! )A :113 1 ! _L.T . 1'riC:' We)] ER FLOW EI) ICJ1.11..D nU_)'1"'. Whilf 1'0 fiETAT11INCl WhL.L.S. CIL.fi1C] .",I.101Jt_..Ci IJIF 1114111 11.1) Nl.., I' I.-:1. t:F'. T'17. r-1hVL"•` (1 1)ITC;H L_ 1 I:L: ;,i:)!�h r;r;C_r1`; €`€ Io I 1� All. ) 1701'1111=1.. WA i I_ ..: :CiV'rt] my Y(lrm..�.1i\1 r`'our, t 6rd, 1. VIULVII••!IL- t i 'f t .i CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS July 6, 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council and>t�d6?rator FROM: James E. Danielson and Kevin Batchelder Public Works Director Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Mendakota Sign Case No. 89-21 DISCUSSION: At their June meeting the Planning Commission conducted a publ hearing to consider an application from Mendakota Country Club to c a fence around their boundaries and to consider a variance to allow construction of a sign on City property at the intersection of Dodd Mendakota Drive. There were some neighbors at the hearing that liv the south boundary in Mendakota Estates, and they were objecting to that Mendakota had not completed all phases of their landscape plan truct Road and along the fact Planning Commissioners also felt that the proposed fence shoulbe landscaped along Dodd Road in order to camouflage it. The public h aring was continued to the July meeting to allow time for the applicant t go to his Board to be able to respond to the requ6sts for additional land caping. Planning Commission did not have a problem with approvingthe ign as proposed. The Planning Commission made a recommendation to approve the sign, contingent on the staff wqrking out the terms for maintenance and t liability with Mendakota Country Club. City Attorney Hart has dete mined that all that is necessary is a "revokable license" allowing placem nt of the sign on City property. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted 4-2 to continue the public hearing with regards to the conditional use permit for the fence, however they qid make a unanimous recommendation to approve a variance allowing placement f their sign on City property. I ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the Planning Commission ncm;ndation they should pass a motion approving a variance allowing place the Mendakota sign on City property subject to staff preparing the app opriate revoKable license and execution by the Mendakota Country Club and ity Council. 2075 Mondokvm Drive ^ Mendota Heights, WN5512u^4s4 cnom June 6, 1989 City of Mendota 8eio6be lIOl Victoria Curve Mendota Heightd, MN 55118 RE: Application for conditional use and variance from setback requi Mendakota Country Club is requesting a conditional use permit and a from the City of Mendota Heights for the following: A. The installation of a sign located on city property at the northwest of the intersection of Highway 49 (Dodd Road) and MendakotE Drive specifically 501 from Dodd Road and 201 from Mendakota Drive. A ::opy of the sign detail is attached. B. The ^^^~~~l^~^^`^' of --~----z --'---g ----'- the perimeter—of '' Endakota Country Club property. The fencing shall -be 5" high and of the chain link type' All fencing along Dodd Road will be green in color. AlL other ` fencing will be galvanized. & gate will be used at the existing southern most entry drive along Dodd Road. | The fencing will be commeted%.io phases with Phase I being equired immediately to secure the eastern end of the property and at the eaoeom end of the new practice range as a screen for golf balls. I The attached sketch shows the approximate location of the proposed encing. We will tie into existing MNDOT fencing along Highway 10 and 35E when Pase II As part of our fencing plan we request a variance from the City which will allow us to place fencing on the property line between Mendakota and City owned property along the north and west border of the Fire Station property (including the farmhouse). We also request a variance to place fencirig along Dodd Road within the 301 setback from Dodd Road. We understand tyat this fencing along Dodd Road is at our risk. Should MDOT decide to upgr de Dodd Road we will move the fencing. f June City of Mendota 5/ 1989 0eigbto Page 2 The purpose of the fence is to protect the property from damage by acc�dent or vandalism which has occured on other golf courses and to restrict access, particularly on the east border along Dodd Road, except to authorized ersons. We thank the city for their consideration of this matter and hope yours Truly/ 'c President Mehd kota Country Club cc: Hans Letebec/ M.C.C. Bob Connell, M.C.C. _ Don Lewis, M.C.C. � c/ raidakala .IYLA (56un4dib 2075 Mendakota Drive • Mendota Heights, MN 55120.454-2822 Legal Description of Mendakota Country Club Property: Lots 4, 5 and 6, Joseph's Rearrangement, according to the recorded plat thereof, The West 1 acre of the Past 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 - The /4;The South 1301. 2 feet of the Past 1303. 5 feet of the Southwest 1 The North 214. 5 feet of the West 660 feet of the South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4; The North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 except the South 6 feet of the East 577. 5 feet thereof and except the South 1 acre of the East of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Southeast 1/4; all Section 26, '.Township 28, Range 23, Subject to easements for highway and utility purposes, that par+ of the West 1 /2 of the West 1 /2 of tile: Northwest 1 /4 of the Sout 1/4 lying Southerly t f State Trunk highway # 100 and Northwest of State Trunk highway # 49, Section 25, Township 28, Range together with drainage ease'inent described in Book 265 of Deed page 408, and Subject to utility occupancy, easements and restrictions if any record, 1; /2 n hwest e rly 3, Ch- fendakola G6unlitl dub 2075 Mendakota Drive • Mendota Heights, MN 55120 • 454-2822 Legal Description of Mendakota Country Club Property: That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 28, Ranlge 23, Dakota County, tlinnesota, described as follows: Commencinn at the northeast corner of the South Ilalf of said Southeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 49 minutes 50 seconds East along the east line of said Southeast Quarter a distance of 317.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 33 minutes 26 seconds Vest, parallel with the north line of said South Half of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 330.00 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 0 degrees 49 minutes 50 seconds West, parallel with said east line, a distance of 323.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 33 minutes 26 seconds Nest, parallel with said north line, a distance of 247.50 feet; thence South 0 degrees 49 minutes 50 seconds East, parallel with said east line, a distance of 6.00 feet to said north line; thence South'89 degrees 33 ninutes 26 seconds West along said north line a distance of 1391.55 feet to a point 660.00 feet easterly from the northwest corner of said South Half of the Southeast Quarter; thence South 0 degrees 45 minutes 03 seconds East, parallel with the west line of said Southeast Quarter, a distance of 214.50 feet; thence South 82 degrees 49 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 12C9.54 feet; thence North 82 denrees 04 minutes 01 seconds East a distance of 444.99 feet to the point of beginning. T �Uop P44 Sheet Title Job Title �teN CtaClmlw GUJb . Drawn Date comr4. Sheet No. � .. � • ! ��► X10 �t�Nf 400 Slbwy Stroh 1'I'T } Sheet Title Job Title �teN CtaClmlw GUJb . Drawn Date comr4. Sheet No. � .. � • ! ��► X10 �t�Nf 400 Slbwy Stroh Saint Paul, Minnesota 58101 (612) 222-3701 ARCWECTS r2 W470p. IC0,A. (v , Tr-opzw * \\160 HaP4 Shoot Title Drawn Date Job Title '4W'il"yStrait Saint Paul, Wnrasolo 53101 (612) 222-3701 ma Sheet No. 4404. tz �J IFI '12411o� �sA _ �•SI � ¢ It*1 • it �E Nra• U U r wr rrk�x `+�f.W"* yl��y '_'- x ''�3 x �..* x�ax"�` •• Ll Fy � Dtr•r .4.,,c� 4 =----- .AxoTA G. G CITY:OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM:; KEVIN L. BATCHELDER, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANZ SUBJECT: Conditional'Use Permit for Security Fence and Sign Location Planning Case 89-21 Mendakota-Country Club DATE: June 22, 1989 INTRODUCTION On February 2, 1988, City Council granted to Mendakota Country Club, a Conditional Use Permit for the constructio of a new clubhouse and rearrangement of the golf course. has subsequently been, constructed. John Carl, Jr., Vice President of the Club, has submitted a proposal and application to amend the Conditional Use Permit to include the installation of ;a secur•ty fence and identification si DISCUSSION t The applicant is proposing to construct a five (51) foot high,,chain link fence along Dodd Road; Trunk Highway 110, ' along the north and west borders of the Fire Station and a the rear lot lines of some residential lots along the sou h boundary of Mendakota Country Club. They are proposing t do this,in three stages. (See attached applicant letter of explanation and map)., Phase One is proposed to be constructed this year and represents the most',critical locations for potential vand is to enter the propertyi As part of the amendment to the Conditional Use Permit, the applicant is requesting a variance to the required 301 front yard setback along the public right of way along Dodd Road. (Ordinance No. 401, Sections 4.8(2)a and 4.8(2)6]. An identification sign is proposed to be constructed at t e north-west corner of Mendakota Drive and Dodd Road. This sign is proposed to be located on city property adjacent o the Fire Station. The location is a proposed 50' from Do d Road and 20' from Mendakota Drive. The size of the sign nd the setbacks conform to City Code. [No. 401, Sections 18.6(3) and 18.6(5)3. Staff has no problem with the sign location on City proper as proposed, however, an agreement needs to be worked out betwe ' en Mendakota!Country Club and the,City regarding term under.which the sign will be allowed. In response to complaints from two property owners on Mendakota Drive, Staff met this week with John Carl, Jr.; Hans lefeber, to,ieview the landscape plan and the intende buffer between the country club's parking lot and the sing family lots on Mendakota Drive. It appears Mendakota Coun Club has met the -requirement of the first phase of the landscaping plan. (See attached copy of landscape plan). Some neighbors may be present at the public hearing to address their concerns about lighting, noise and landscapi ACTION REQUIRED Conduct the public hearing and make a recommendation to Council on amending the Conditional Use Permit to allow installation of a security fence and identification sign the appropriate variances. V nd e City th PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 27 June 1989 Mendakota County Club South of Highway 110, Between 35E and Dodd Road (see sketch) I Approval of Conditional Use Permit for Sign Locatior and Variance to Fence Height 1. Mendakota County Club has undergone substantial changes, includinj the recent construction of a new Club House (in a new location off ogers Lake), new accessory parking areas, driving range, access, an the reconfiguration of some greens, tees, and fairways. These chan es have precipitated a serious analysis of their fencing and security plan. Therefore, they are proposing additional fencing along the periph ry of the property (within the property lines) for mainly security pu rposes They are also proposing a small identification sign off their site t the northwest corner of Dodd Road and Mendakota Road, on pr perty contiguous to the fire station site, and owned by the City of M Indota Z. With respect to the fencing concern, you are aware of signIficant problems incurred by some of the metropolitan area golf courses. These problems have been in the form of malicious damage caused by riving automobiles on the greens artd fairways. Such damage has bee and can be, very expensive to repair and difficult to prevent (if someone really wants to do it). According to representatives of the Clu they also have had past problems involving encroachment and damage o the grounds from intruders, not necessarily in a vehicle. I 3. The fencing program is to be done in three phases. Attacheq is a sketch plan submitted by the Vice President of the Club, John Cgfl, Jr., who has also submitted a statement with the application. have prepared a map of the area showing the entire golf course, i h the land under Mendakota's ownership indicated in a light gray pattern 4. The fencing regulations in the R-1 District to which this land is zoned allows a 6 foot high fence any place on the property, except wi hin 30 feet of a public right-of-way. They propose a 5 foot feZei in all cases, therefore, they are seeking a variance from 2-1/2 feet to 5 feet where the proposed fence is within 30 feet of Dodd Road or Trunk Highway 110. 5. When 35E was constructed, Mn[JOT constructed a 5 footgal onizod chain-link fence along portions of the Trunk Highway llO right_ i f -way. The Club proposes to extend this fence with the same height and design Mendakota Country Club, Case No. 89-21 6 to the intersection with Dodd Road. Along Dodd Road they build u 5 foot fence (on the right-of-way line), which will be the coated type of chain-link fence. As we understand it, the green oated fence is proposed to be utilized only along []odd Road. / G~ They also propose to fence the north and west line of the fire st tion, enclosing their utility on the south end of the pond. The fence would the south edge of the driving range to the access drive conning northof k4�ndaho�a Drive. Ao shown on the drawing, they also propose to ence the north and east side of the driving range in Phase D. | 7^ There is a notation on the sketch plan nwup that they propose to ence behind the7 single-family lot (along the north rear lot lino) on Wagon Wheel Trail. Here, e 8 foot fence is ol1ovvod^ though they propose to build a 5 foot fence. � B. There appears to be no particular problem with fencing the golf ourse as proposed. Most golf courses around the country do so. | 9. You will note that the Golf Club owns the property on the north side and contiguous to Mendakota Drive. They propose not to fence contiguous to this right-of-way line, which is 6 good idea. They s ould, however, landscape this area well so that it represents an aesthe ically desirable impact to this portion of the public right-of-way. lD. Regarding landscaping, the City Staff has had a complaint from o e of nc the contiguous single-family home owners south of he Me akota ` Par^///9 LwtIn this area, substantial uu/u^cmpu/g was propose and approved by the City as part of the overall PUD design. Howeve this landscaping has not been completed and should be the subject of some concern (particularly as it r6lates to the single-family ho e o ners). Therefore, Members of the Planning Commission and Council ma wish to visit the site and ascertain the degree to which the landscapi g has been done. We will have a copy of the approved landscape plan t the meeting. 11 We are informed that representatives from City Staff wd 11 be eeting with representatives from the Golf Club on Tuesday, June 'th to review the neighbors' landscaping concerns and also some problem with the lighting of the parking area. Hopefully, these problems an be resolved in conjunction with the current review of the fencing and sign permits. I lI. You will note in John Carl's letter, a request for a condition�l use Mendakota Country Club, Case No. 89-21 =1 __WN 12. Mr. Carl's letter notes that they propose to place the sign 50 feet rom rates; Dodd Road and 20 feet from Mendakota Drive. The drawing indi these dimensions to be reversed. However, we have confirmed wi 'th Mr. Carl that the intent is to place the sign 50 feet from the Dodd oad curb (west side) and 20 feet from the Mendakota curb line (north ide). This location is selected so that the sign will be visible to Dodd oad traffic. Signs normally permitted in the R -I District would be 30 feet back from a public right-of-way. lJ. Ordinarily, identification signs such as the one proposed can be 10 only on the property where the service, business, or facility in lo( Thus, the conditional use permit is requested mince the land on the sign l0 proposed to be located is owned by the City. /\ golf is in many ways a quasi -public facility since many public geth/ occur at the site. On this basis, it would seem reasonable to co/ e sign to be located on public property for the public interest. 14. ` Subject to the solution of other concerns relating to the golf development, it vvomdd aeorn that the fencing proposal and the concept represent a reasonable solution to enhance security conc and public identification. Certainly, it would appear that the oxl� of o private club such as k4endakota has been, and will continue I an asset to the community. ' �� /hlnh club rings sidar | club sign iiiono tence o be, '!.Cas e No. tett itl>i: J,:CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS V1, ;',DAKOTA COUNTY,MINNESOTAt -,fjJ1; ,I it V, j�i 1, iI R k;.1t: "d APPLICATION �O R CONSIDERATION ,.t 7 4 -9T I IF ',PtAN�I*NG''REQUEST; -: Date ,6f Applicatiol A `4ee' Paid Applicant Name: VF1v,0A 1,e67i9 �z!l C Last First,' t Initial 7 /8 Address: c�20 7 5t---1 C:)7--'9 O/Z t U E /%%i-10or,9 /(/7.5 177A15, -6S '. Number .& Street cityState 4, .7 Telephone Number: ,6.;2 a Owner Name: UL,- r - Last First Initial Address: Number & Street Street Location of Property in Question: ,::7, C> -2 Legal Description of Property: Type of Request: City— ove State Zip is Rezoning X Variance- 'J., Dl Conditional jbse 'Pe'timit Conditional Use Peimit for: P.U.D Yf Minorl'Conditiona'l Use Permit Subdivisiori Approval J'' tt!, t it Pll'n-IpproVal ;Wetlands P"im ,�'�,:,.: �tk,;•• .. '{i. ;: �;, � We e I 4S OtherI t , " - I.: � 1;,i "' '. "i is pp -r -r�j4'0i"c- ID F- r 7 lfp: s Tq Vill N .511 it t it ,11ij Applicable City Ordinance Number Section. Present Zoning of Property: Present Use of Pr6perty:_ ra 5 k Proposed Zoning of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Number of people intended to live or work on premises! I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the material are true. Date ture of Applicant rM Received by (title) NOTE: The following plans shall be drawn and attached to this applicat ion: A. Applications'involvifig.a Variance shall submit the following plais: Date Received Ini ial 1. Site Development Plan 2. Dimension Plan 3. Landscape Plan 4. Grading Plan B. Applications involving a Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit or Sublivision shall submit the following: 1. Sketch Plan 2. Abstractors Certificate• (If the subdivision involves cutting of existing parcel into twc or more lots). C. Applications involving*a Wetlands Permit shall submit the following: 1. A full & adequate description of all phases of the operation &/or proposed physical changes. 1 T1, t." 2. A topographic map of the area. Contour intervals shall be drawn at two (2),, foot intervals at a horizontal scale of V 1,0001 or larger; 3. A detailed site plan of the proposal showing proposed drainage, raiding & landscapin, 4. A site design map showing the location of existing and future ma-madefeatures 'I within the site and to a distance of five hundred (500) feet surrounding the*site,,*,v �:t Ilk -W '; , dditional �l f ` j. 77 Received by (title) NOTE: The following plans shall be drawn and attached to this applicat ion: A. Applications'involvifig.a Variance shall submit the following plais: Date Received Ini ial 1. Site Development Plan 2. Dimension Plan 3. Landscape Plan 4. Grading Plan B. Applications involving a Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit or Sublivision shall submit the following: 1. Sketch Plan 2. Abstractors Certificate• (If the subdivision involves cutting of existing parcel into twc or more lots). C. Applications involving*a Wetlands Permit shall submit the following: 1. A full & adequate description of all phases of the operation &/or proposed physical changes. 1 T1, t." 2. A topographic map of the area. Contour intervals shall be drawn at two (2),, foot intervals at a horizontal scale of V 1,0001 or larger; 3. A detailed site plan of the proposal showing proposed drainage, raiding & landscapin, 4. A site design map showing the location of existing and future ma-madefeatures 'I within the site and to a distance of five hundred (500) feet surrounding the*site,,*,v CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING JUNE 12, 1989 TO WIiOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Mendota Heights Pla ning Commission will meet at 8:00 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, June 27, 1989 in the City Council Chambers; 1101 Victor] Curve, to consider an application from Mendakota Country Club for a conditional use permit to allow the construction o security fencing within a front yard area along Dodd Road and, Trunk Highway P0 and the construction of a sign on City property at the intersection of Dodd Road (TH 149) and Mendakota Drive. This property is located in the southwest corner off Dodd Road (TH 149) and Trunk Highway 1.10. This notice is pursuant to City'of Mendota heights Ordinance No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard reference to this request will be heard at the meeting. ]Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk lith 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 5, 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council and Cit W'Ptrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: North Ivy Hills Street Name Change DISCUSSION: Mr. Vern Colon recently had his North Ivy Hills 2nd Addition fia approved by City Council with the street name for the cul-de-sac as e Court. Mr. Colon has not yet filed the plat with the County and has a change of heart on the street name, he now desires to call the scree, "Sutcliff Circle". plat ther RECOMMENDATION: Staff can see no problems with changing the street name to Sutc iff Circle and recommends that it be approved. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they pass a motion approving the name change. L CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 30, 19891 TO: Mayor, City Council and Cit '/Cd4Q)'trator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Maczko Variance Case No. 89-24 DISCUSSION: At their June 20th meeting the Planning Commission considered a request from Mr. John Maczko for a front and side yard setback variances (see at- tached staff memos). At the meeting Commissioner Anderson expressed a concern that the front yard extension would not be as aesthically pleasing as adding to the back yard. Mr. Maczko stated that adding to the back would block all the windows to his living room. The Commission further di cussed that granting this variance would set a precedent for other neighbornoods. The Planning Commission was aware that precedent had already been established for granting 10 feet front yard variances in Friendly Hills. Since that meeting staff has located that previously approved Council policy (see attached minutes for the September 18, 1979 Council meeting). RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission voted 5-1 (Anderson) to recommend approval f the requested variances. V ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the Planning Commission recomme dation they should pass a motion granting a 8161, front yard setback varianc and a 6" side yard setback variance. ~ ^ Ayes: 4 's: O BID AWARD Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 gage 1147 September 18, 1979 Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. The hearing was closed at 8:10 o'clock P.M. The Council received and reviewed an abstract of bids ruoei for construction of Ivy Falls Creek/Maple Park Drive storm sewer improvements. � On the recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Los moved the adoption of Resolution No. 79-9f, , "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR IVY FALLS CKCOK/M PARK DRIVE STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 79, PROJECT NO. 6)," awarding the contract to the low bidder, F. F. Jedlicki, Inc., for their bid of $I9,575^00. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. |Ux8I8 AVENUE The Council acknowledged receipt of a tabulation of bids 8nIDGO DCP8IK received for construction of Marie Avenue bridge approach BIDS subsurface restoratioa' oiaooeaioo on the matter was dela' l to later lndhe meeting. � CASE WO, 79-23, It was noted by the Council that discussion on the applinz }V\UGON VARIANCE for front yard setback variance at 753 Pontiac Place has L continued from September lltb at which meeting staff had I directed to prepare a history of Friendly Hills Addition front yard setback variance approvals. The Council ankoo, aod briefly discussed a staff report outlining such vaziar which received approval -since 1972' The zaDort indicated there had been two variances of less than five feet grauLe and that variances of nine and one-half feet and Lon fcoL also gzaotaU' ��. After a brief discussion, Mayor Lockwood moved approval o| ten toot front yard setback variance at 753 Pontiac Place, allow construction of a garage twenty feet from the front property line. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 'ed zoo !en �n Ledged ,es Ahat vere a to VARIANCE POLICY It was the concensus of the Council that a policy should )e adopted~ / variances to applications for variances of lU feet or les5.� The primary concern was that approval of variances which ld \ allow conversion of garage space into living space might reate ' situations where future garage construction might require variances which would intrude ngou the front yards closer than \ twenty feet from the property line. | After discussion, Councilma ' n Losleben moved the adoption f a policy limiting front yard setback variance consideratior to those applications requesting variances of ten feet or less, d requiring submission of a plan showing how a new garage could be constructed in such a way as not to create the necessity to consider additional future front yard setback requests (4 n Page 1148 September 18, 1979 those cases where an existing garage is being converted living space). Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 79-24, Mr. Richard Bjorklund, Jr., was present to discuss his DJOIZXLUND application for variance for Lot 3, Block 8, Ivy Falls S( Addition. In response to Council direction on September Mr. Bjorklund presented a revised site plan showing a pr( structure in relation to the proposed 10 foot sideyard or Emerson. Mayor Lockwood moved approval of a 20 foot sideyard set variance as requested, to allow construction of a struc ..10 feet from the property line abutting Emerson Avenue. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 WATER SYSTEM The Council acknowledged receipt of letters from Sports ASSESSMENTS Inc., Mrs. J.D. Thompson, Mr. Jerry Schouveller, Mr. Rob Larson, and Mr. Brian Birch relative to the assessments water system improvements. The Council also acknowledge from the City Administrator recommending that the Counci consider deferring the making of assessments against pro on which residences are located, based on a maximum defe of $625, or the equivalent of one-half acre of property. After discussion, Councilman Hartmann moved the adoptior of Resolution No. 79-98, "RESOLUTION DEFERRING THE MAKIt ASSESSMENTS RELATIVE TO MUNICIPAL WATER STORAGE TANK AN[ RELATED DISTRIBUTION LINE IMPROVEMENTS (IMPROVEMENT NO. PROJECT NO. 8," dp.terring the making of assessments of u $625 for those parc6ls recommended in the Administrator' Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 flays: 0 Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 I cond 11th, fil posed It ck re WWUA. , rt or a me mo rties en OF 7, to memo. Mr. Herbert Dalglish was present to request a deferment on the Ostertag property,.Parcel No. 27-03400-010-27. Mr. Dal lisp stated that the property is very narrow and probably coildn't be built upon unless it is put together with another pr(perty. After discussion, Councilman Losleben moved the adoptior of Resolution No. 79-99, "RESOLUTION DEFERRING THE MAKING OF ASSESSMENT AS TO OSTE-RTAG PROPERTY (IMPROVEMENT NO. 77, PROJECT NO. 8)." Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. The Council acknowledged and briefly discussed the lett?r from Mr. Brian Birch. It was the concensus of the Council teat since Mr. Birch has submitted no definitive and accepta)le alternative assessment proposal no action should be takn. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: KEVIN L. BATCHELDER, ADMINISTRATIVE A5&I'Si' SUBJECT: Maczko Variance�� Case No. 89-24 (� DATE: June 21, 1989 DISCUSSION John Maczko, 751 Cheyenne Lane, desires to add an addition his house in order to enlarge his garage, relocate a: stairwell to enlarge the kitchen, provide an entrance from the garage to the house, and provide additional storage. has submitted a letter explaining his request and signatur of consent from his affected neighbors. ACTION REQUIRED Review the request with the applicants and make a recommendation to the City Council on their request for ar 8 foot, 6 inch (8' 611) front yard setback variance and a 6 inch (611) side yard setback variance. CO To Members of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission and members of the City Council. My name is John Maczko and I and my family live at 751 Chwriting 'e lane I in g r which is in the friendly hills addition of the city. I am , 0 you requesting an 8' 6" +/- variance to the front yard setback requi ements and a 6" +/- variance to the side lot setback requirements so th t I can put an addition onto my existing home. The proposed addition would increase my garage size from 19' X 2'to 26' X 30'. This would allow me to park both of my cars in the garage Ind also to store my snowmobile trailer inside. There will also be a small addition to the house allowing me to relocate the existing stairwell f om the kitchen to the front, enlarge the kitchen in the future, provide an ntrance from the garage to the house, and provide additional closet and storage space. Since when the house was originally built it was built right he required setbacks I cannot accomplish any of the above without l atthe yard setback variance. The side lot setback variance is required 'io keep the east side of the garage one continuous wall. I have had t le plans reviewed by -the neighbors, with exception of the Vacarros at 752 Cheyenne lane I believe they are on vacation, and none of them op ose the addition or variance and eveff commented that they thought it was an attractive addition. I hope that you will find in my favor and I will be available to an questions. -Sin-cerely 4. n PMaczko � qsg —59 (o I r any To Whom it May Concern, We the undersigned have reviewed the plans of Mr. John Maczko for the addition to his house. We also realized that Mr. Maczko is requesting a variance of the front yard setback of approximately 9 feet and a side lot variance of approximately 6 inches and we are not opposed to this request. 7WCheyenne Lane 748 Cyenne Lane 752 Cheyenne Lane 2222 Apache Stre t PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 27 June 1989 RM John and Lynne Maczko One Lot EooL Northeast Corner Lane and Apache sketch) Of of Chey Street � Approval of Variance to Yard Setback / l. John and Lynne K4eozko have oubnniLhad to the City a series of / drawings indicating their proposed expansion of their house. expansion includes extending the existing garage 8 feet, 6 inches tc southwest toward Cheyenne Lane. The first drawing is, o site plan shows the expansion of the garage toward the front and to the In addition, there is an expansion to the house for o new entranc the interior corner of this "L« shaped house). They have also subrT e statement describing their proposal, along with a list of the noi they have contacted. . | the ,mne (see roni �hree The the that side. � On ithod ibors Z. The house is sited on a 70 foot lot with the proper lO foot set)acks on either side. The expansion proposal requires a variance to the front yard setback, since the existing 30 foot setback (to the front � right-of-way line) will be reduced from 30 feet to 21 feet, 6 inches. 3. Over the years, there have been many garage expansions in the Fr Hills area. In all caumn' the *City has suggested that garage ewpe involving an addition toward the front of the lot be held back at 20 feat from the public right-of-way so as to provide adequate for the parking of o car on private property in front of the g This is important *because if sidewalks are ever conatruoLodL parked in the driveway might extend across the right-of-way Maintaining 20 feet of private property between the right-of-wo, and the front of the garage provides space where s oar can be p washed, or 1ofC over night without intrusion on the public right -mf-` 4. There is usually a 15 foot boulevard between the edge of the pav and the right-of-way. If no sidewalk exists, the extension of a P vehicles into this boulevard is not serious. However, when aidevvall built, parking cars across the sidewalk alignment could result in Throughout the Friendly Hills area there have been a numnbi variances approved within the criteria that there be at )aomt 20 f setback remaining. In this case, the setback would be 21 f inchou.Therofore, the setback conforms with the overall poll ' allowing e variance up to 10 feat. | endly mionu baoot -pace rage. car line. line rkad, ay. *rnent rivabe u are .,.^/. or of at of at, G 'y of ' ^ John and Lynne Maczko, Case No. 89-24 2 5. The lots in Friendly Hills are relatively ornaLL averaging appro 10,000 square feet rather than the 15,000 square feet normally reqyired since this subdivision was built. Thus, due to the lots being relatively small, there have been a number of variances requested because expansion capabilities are limited. 6. With respect to the contiguous properties, the adjoining home to the southeast has the garage contiguous to the K4aczhdu easterly side. Thus, the impact on this residence may well be minimal. Also, the residence to the northwest orients toward Apache Street, therefore, the northwesterly side bot line of the K4aczko's lot is contiguous to this neighbor's rear lot line. | 7. In nunnrnar^, it would appear that the proposed division is rmaeonob scale with the established setback policy and will have minimal a on contiguous properties. N 13 �. in |Yoot P 7 sf ti r b�• 13 ti b�' 7, �ti' , .2 y IT 4 ,,• J2 t bs 6 arm a� SUBJECT PROPERTY NORTH v>`h )-25 o, _. SCALE y "--200' . ? 9 x� rtT�t '�� 3r. to A' tttr Mrd /o v dr ✓y s3 to ,roar f v ij w 14 5 e�j, ` S F 3 Ga Ir t t 10 y !1f ♦ y b+ z NF1 Jo 17 as /oS ca L. /p bra , � „ � °'• mJ �,. � t � O Audreft It 30 r3r,rS L . �.o \ ��, r is m / L r h Z y y !<< t J b Z 010-26 .� « d r 0 a♦ o o' �'►• 1 r ? .t7p Z4 ,o 3 , a ro a it 5` �.R .r,, 4 °S s� . id + ttp va /Q G . 4 r3 -L3 v Q fo •. `7 rt 3 S <+sr Z` tt s! srra �t ©1 •'rF4do 05 '•s O y , .cp T 17 rr 020-26 " ' 4 ,,,� c. is t l7 J7a ± 13 r rm 'dj A ` o C �� . � �,t• yo t � ,� o , '�► a �, o �. h a • t, - (y ioY 030-26 f h ♦ ` Ay / Irj t S' s 7 y rr Ie J 7 �7 ♦ .- f... tog y o to c %, `� frm ft7 b 8 Sr + , o 17 J Z s* L to i �, Sl' r rrtro a/i rot d 7 r4 a4Y .a rr to i° rme f7lJ Se ,r S • /o a S o 20 3 4 22 7 ti r 9 4 t f 6 0 t ti Y'a pd 's too ?rr 3 G /o / p> > °5 a 14 s S rQ at 9 * d r,m'iJ a '` ` ��. ♦ fi 4 'o � .n / x ! i. 9 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS July 5, 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council and 5y;Vdmj0s)trt— or FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Kuross Lot Division Case No. 89-22 DISCUSSION:. Mr. Art Kuross appeared at the June Planning Commission meeti g to request a second lot division that further increases the size of 0 tlot A. Outlot A provides access to the previously landlocked parcel of la d located north of his plat (see attached staff reports). The Planning Commission had stated previously that it desired to increase the size of this ace ss. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approvl of the request. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the Planning Commission recc they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 89-_, RESOLUZ APPROVING THE LOT DIVISION OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, VALIS ADDITION. tion t i City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89 - RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOT DIVISION OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, VAL'S ADDITION WHEREAS, Mr. Arthur Kuross, owner of Lot 2, Block 1, Val's Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota has requested from the City to divide a portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Vat's Addition acdording to a survey prepared by Demars-Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc. and dated February 13, 1989, said portion called Parcel c; and WHEREAS, Parcel C is to be added to Outlot A, Val's Addition; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said lot divisi and finds the same to be in order. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Counc1 of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, that the lot division submitted at this meeting be and the same is hereb approved. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota heights tis 11 day of July 1989. N .%�- CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGIITS ATTEST: a z eee M. Swanson, City C er By Charles E. Mer eensotto, Mayor A 4j jig, 1 Case No Is Yq .,I Aj 4" T di, -Y OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS' W� fflESOTA, AKOTA.,COUNTY',:,.Mll If 'iDr APPLIC . AftO0jbR`t66N S�ATION It �jj (4 `I,�Jfl �;:PL ANNI G'%g UEST!0i?.!� I T Date of Aopl cAt jh:c tls*, ir r �E I f� EPI,41 Js kc , 11. 1 5- � 1K. % "S F if 4- " � , , I �5 it ji ee Paid' qo-, joWif,; D. i o -7 54--14? Applicant,' m Ili Ki`04711;T1194.1? 1! Last 1, ilo �fl F ir t I', Initial A. Y Address: Ci Zip State ielephone mb�r Sof .�`- ,, " p I ji 14pumber.4 Street *f*4� Nu ",Owner 11-'i Name Last First Initial Address. ber,& Street City State Zip a o o ,,t8treet L jroperty,,, Question,:: -JALs t C 4 :�kLegi "t il'Deackiption'of Proper is j 4 % of - Reques t: 0 Rezoning' ,ype,, Variance, Conditional Use Permit Rif, Conditional Use Permit or P . . . 41 f fir. Minor,Conditional 'Use Permit -Subdivision Approval 1.7 t4 1; ND' iR i 4. I A i", 1 4 SiW,. -J., I Plan Approval, .;4��'-i Wetlands Permitl� is ar Ato T-. k. . t ... , "., i%i74A11Bi , I "Othe IN, t '. - 7 J �V g A A-4 -0 'T g, o's n f f 'so !V, 4. q MR liV , 14 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: KEVIN L. BATCHELDER, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT .4 SUBJECT: Kuross Lot Division Case No. 89-22 DATE: June 21, 1989 DISCUSSION Arthur Kuross, 1155 Orchard Place, is proposing a lot division of Lot 2, Block 1 of Val's Addition. (See attace survey.) Previously, Mr. Kuross platted an outlot, Parce on survey, to provide access to a landlocked lot owned by Mr. Ed Paster. This was done at the City's request and t e subdivision was approved at the March -7, 1989 City Counci meeting. (See attached staff memo dated March 2, 1989.) The granting of this subdivision increased the width of Outlot A by adding Parcel B. Now, Mr. Ed Paster has work d out a further agreement with Mr. Kuross to further increa e the size of his access by adding Parcel C. 1, The addition of Parcel C comes from Lot 2, Block 1, Val's Addition. The reduction of Parcel A, by Parcel C, does n t adversely impact Parcel A which would still far exceed th minimum lot size. Staff feels that this division falls within the "exceptio., to the subdivision ordinance and may be processed withou a public hearing. (See Ordinance 301, Section 11.3(1)). 1 ACTION REQUIRE Review the requested lot division, waive the public hear and make a recommendation to the City Council on the lot division request. KLB:jak 12 , PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: 27 June 1989 Arthur Kurosn Northwest of Orchard C (see sketch) I ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of Lot Division PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 1. Not too fong ago, the applicant proposed, 'and the City approved, the subdivision of land that resulted in the platting of Orchard Circle and contiguous lots. Included in that plat was a private driveway to pr vide access to a triangular shaped lot, which had its only public right -o -way frontage on Trunk Highway 13 down the hill from the property. 3. A private driveway constructed off of Trunk Highway 13 to thisl high ground on the triangular parcel would have been extremely teep, difficult to build, and difficult to maintain. Therefore, Mr. Kuros was encouraged to provide an access from the top of the hill vi the approved private driveway off of the northwesterly corner of 0 chard Circle. That triangular shaped parcel has subsequently been sold t Mr. Ed Paster who recently has requested that the private d1rivew y be widened. Thus, Mr. Kuross is now proposing a change in the o iginal plat so as to widen the north -south portion of the driveway y an , uuvuip,v^l 5 feet and the eeoc-vveoc portion or the driveway y an additional 10 feet. It also appears that the driveway will be leng hened by the addition of an area shown on the lot division to be Parcel C. 3. On the attached map of the area, we have indicated the I nd in question with a light gray color and have shown the expanded dr veway width in black. Thus, you will be able to see the impact f the overall width change as it relates to the properties in the vlcini y and the triangular shaped parcel, in particular. 4. You will note that all of the lots in this subdivision prev i ously �toposed and the parcel in question far exceed the minimum lot size. P rcel A (the remainder of the original lot) will be 32,760 square feet. The final dimensions of the private driveway will be 25 feet or its north -south leg and 30 feet for its east -west leg. The additiona width on the east -west leg relates to the retention of some existing t ees (as indicated by the applicant). 5. In width is not significant as /t relates to the oevo/opanuicy o, thee xmc as originally platted. It also appears to enhance the accessibility to the off-site triangular parcel to which the 000emo is designed to oary. LOT. 1 to CD to t.4 100 IAS 0 .0 R,c0RO PJ 0 j 'Es eNcQ. i r312�' DO GS\, i ci 0z clormqvj FOR r — 1. 1 . I I i 3 p -q, 4 Ad LOT 1 0 BLOCK LOT I 14 to 97000 SOO 2516w t4lC)O ---L:x 3 N$$"52211 " I lw!ts:xs: ITA- it LO TS. FUTURE 7 :+ HUNTER 7 PART OF LOT 3 ; BLUFF 4: sy 41 4 PIRT OF LOT 2 PAW OF LOT, 74? r)F_. NA vvtvA 4 tv Pt t3 LOT HUNTE.A SUBJECT PROPERTY NOMAS 3 �, wr BLUFF cM NO RTH I LY A I. SCALE i"=200' w ;7n HILL �� = '�,� ,� t 4 of" .1k of. 61 02r. 1 0 O!n I -P 14 E1-7-7 17-Y )30-G2 71 5 win 3 Ac 24-08Z-0 040-06 0? 032-08 1100 00 171 Iva'L L 4 31 E 0,10-02 Z- - AF017C rA 2 3 A ZI-9. 37- Z-xv. 3 3 2 x a.. '5 010-07 071-0?- C50-02 060 - 02 0 9 0, —0,0 2 ZS -3 7 - lot C, I et 4 01 > k )k tl 0 020-03 030-03 y '(Y k 0 N e9* i6'31 -E w co I ',16 �1,tj 010-03 ml 5 �- a z CIRCLE 0i IL W 14 '44 I I 36.60 Q: 04 h- (. i "D It -WWUl:AR T4 c, T i; _-Ronne CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGIITS MEMO March 2, 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council and City d i trator FROM: James E. Danielson Eublic Works Director SUBJECT: Kuross Lot Division Case No. 89-08 DISCUSSION: At their February.meeting the Planning Commission consider d a request from Mr. Art Kuross to subdivide Lot 2, Block 1, Val's Addition and increase the size of Outlot A (see attached staff memo). Mr. Kuross has to be out of town on the Council meeting date so I told him that I would attemp� to answer Council questions for him. I RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the requested lot division. ACTIO14 REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the Planning Commission recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolut 89 - , RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOT DIVISION OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, VAL'S ADDITION. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO February 22, 1989 TO: Planning Commission 'FROM: James E. Danielson and Paul R. Berg Public Works Director Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Kuross Lot Division Case No. 89-08 DISCUSSION: Mr. Art Kuross, the developer of Val's Addition, was asked;by the ity when tie was platting his land to provide land access to a previously la d locked piece of property. Mr. Kuross agreed to the City's request and reated Outlot A which accomplished the request (see attached drawing).' Mr. Ed Paster the owner of this previously land locked property now desires to have a wider strip for access' than was platted. Increasing the size of the st ip does not adversely affect Lot 2 from which the lana is being taken. St ff fools that this division falls within the "exception" to the subdivisio ordinance and may be processed without a public hearing. ACTION REQUIRED: Review the requested lot division and mdke a recommendation to th City Council on waiving the public hearing and granting the lot division re uest. PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: i 28 February 1989 Arthur Kuross , Northwest of Orchard (see sketch) Subdivision Approval 1. Arthur Kuross recently submitted, and the City approved, a new an area of land known as Vats Addition. That plat consists o lots in [clocks 1 and 2, with the potential for an additional five land not owned by the' Applicant. Attached is a copy of a Indicating this plat with Lot 2 of Block 1 shaded in gray. :Ircle lot for seven ots on rowing 2. A feature of Vats Addition was the provision for a private acces road to a triangular parcel of land, north of the plat, consisting�,f 1.10 acres. The private roadway was platted .as Parcel B and was esigned to be 20 feet In width. Due to tree locations and exists g and proposed ditching, the 20 foot width proved to be inadequate, th refore, 18 feet of width is proposed.: 3. We had suggested to Mr. Kuross that this right-of-way could be jwldened through the use of an easement which would not require CitypprOva). The parties involved, however, desire that the parcel be wide sed and that the additional width be transferred by fee title. G. Thus, the proposal is toj.amend the original plat to, provide 5 feet of additional width for 'the private right-of-way for the north-suth leg and an additional 10 feet of width for the east -west leg. 5. A copy of a proposed lot division submitted by the applicant s could be attached to this report for your consideration. , Also attached i a copy of the private roadway as originally platted at 20 feet wide for both legs of the parcel. 6. If the roadway is constructed to be 18 feet in width, ce tainly a right-of-way of 25 feet and 30 feet is not excessive. Mr. Kuross Informs us that he proposes to keep the north -south leg at 25 feet because he does not want to remove the existing treescont guous to the west. The east -west leg does not have such critically loco ed trees and, therefore, is proposed to be widened an additional 10 fe t to 30 feet. 7. We have suggested that they may wish to Include a small an le where the Parcel B right-of-way Intersects with Orchard Circle. At hat point the actual entrance point to the private driveway remains at 20 feet. Obviously, the lot from which this additional right-of-way widti is being taken is very large, and there is no Impact on this property from the additional width for this private access road. ' z �� >t �9 / ��a sA EA' ��'\ �0`: ,1 ✓ z A5 4d. ``at _ 3J � RECOCJ Y+ / gCE edea oE,A,L . ,NGSL rr 4t "'itc.Gatr�4h ';p FOA---- i — — ° , { t LOT t Bt.Of.K ! le ii 16 I\ '/ _ • { _. z. 1st j7f F t_ _. _._� 4 _J 97 \/ n" 1 Ei 0'i i • 4 ,((J 141O0_tu_ _ t« :kq;::' ::: •?fir i 1 ; , n � t._.._ t : � ya: j: U t Y�f::.1.191 t $:tsi ' Cit L - :�. .tt FUTURE 5 LOTS , 1V I HUNTER PART Or 1,b BUFF �' .' �r ...':y:�:t ;�: .1 �•. I:j!�I�: ••:2 •��;. •3• t,: �4rJ S► •�. rc s� tJ f tat 01 f .. t or z non o� `« •-: .i ?• ry . J, ti _:. —j! r " _'`� •� __'� Oct.- VGRNA 'tl^m 3 for'� `HUNT�f� '`��:` ;' (r ,;3 SUBJECT PROPERTY t,oMA p,t .. a„,( .t i BL_UFF �.� .�� p� .h:' ��` t NORTH LY 11040 r) f f I =` i Zbo7 _ ''� •' bRc� SCALE 1”-200' HILL..14 -N �'t ttt t�.. �= vtl tt • t 02r,.(), ,•� O r to /7-7 L 3, AG. 032.09 040-06 r' 't? I.11? 17 t J Ia,zS 17t,zi ,tGodTo-O; P is _ .ttoyyr t 126 LC 4 � N.E9aiQ'3!„E.. .. _ .. 0 .1Q• t1? i1e _...._._..-. `�•�---•-'-. 2Z8.3Z ,' ZQ.3S a� a.. •s; 14 . d 3 C50- 02 d oro -07 4(1 tAc., NT n:1 .0 �± 4, 020.03 _ 0 1 O i tie�ore l� E C 010-03 lC 't 10 030-�3 5 V 4X h10 1 l 'Elt CIHCIE -; a r W V v /Yo/-oJd CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS July 7, 11 TO: Mayor, City Council and City d J-6Va-tor FROM: Klayton H. Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Alice Lane Subdivision Final Plat, Plans & Specifications Job No. 8911 Improvement No. 89, Project No. 3 nTQrTTQqTnW- Attached is a copy of the Alice Lane Subdivision final plat, veloper's Agreement and public improvement plans (specification U available Tuesday evening at the meeting). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Developer's Agreement, final plat and specification be approved as submitted. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation the pass a motion authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to exe Developer's Agreement, adopting.Resolution No. 89-_, RESOLUTION FINAL PLAT FOR ALICE LANE SUBDIVISION, and adopting Resolution No RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZI TISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE ALICE LANE SUBDIVISIO ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 3). be plans should to the 89-_, ADVER- AND City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89 - RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE ALICE LANE SUBDIVISION AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 3) WHEREAS, the City Engineer reported that the proposed improvements construction thereof were feasible and desirable and further report on the proposed costs of said improvements and construction thereof and WHEREAS, the.City Council has heretofore directed that the City neer proceed with the preparation of plans and specifications t, and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications fo said improvements and has presented such plans and specifications t the City Council for approval. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the plans and specifications for said improvements be and they are hereby in all respects approved. I 2. That the City Clerk with the aid acid assistance of the Cit� Engineer be and is hereby authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said improvements all in accordance with the applicable Mianesota Statutes, such bids to be received at the City Hall of the City of Mendota Heights by 10:00 o1clock A.M., Thursday, July 27, 1989, at which time they will be publicly opened in the City Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Engineer will then be tabulated, and will then be considered by the City Council at Lts next regular Council meeting. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 11t day of July, 1989. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS B Charles E. Mertensotto, ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CONTRACT FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT Job No. Imp. No This agreement, made and entered into this day of 1989, by and between the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, (hereinafter called the "City") and Blesener Builders, 1815 Twin Mendota Heights MN 55118 (herinafter called the "Developer"). W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, Developer proposes a plat for a single family del Mendota Heights to be known as Alice Lane Subdivision Number 1 lc of Wagon Wheel Trial, West of Dodd Road, and East of Rogers Couri WHEREAS, public services are needed by the Developer from Heights in order to proceed with said development; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the two follows: 1. In the event that the City initiates litigation to en7 performance of Developer's obligations hereunder, the entitled to reimbursement of all costs and attorney fe in connection therewith, wheather incurred prior to o] of judgement. 8911 89-3 , Minnesota, Circle Drive, relopment in >cated north ; and Mendota parties as orce City shall be es incurred after entry 2. Developer will petition the City for needed public im rovements (Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, watermains, and Streets). Developer agrees to pay $1,500.00 escrow to the City as per ordinance 1503. Escrow to be refunded upon successful completion of project. .L 3. Developer will provide at no cost to the City all needed temporary construction easements to install said improvements a d those permanent, right of way and easements, necessary for aid public improvements. 4. Developer will proceed immediately to commission a re istered land surveyer to place and maintain enough lot corners so 4hat street centerlines and all utilities can be located by City 4taff. 5. Developer acknowledges that there will be park contriution due to the City as per Ordinance 301, Section 6 as amended b Resolution 80-16. That contribution is to be $600.00 per lot or $1,800 and is payable at the time the mayor signs the final plat, 6. Grading operations may be completed in phases (i.e. i or group of lots) by the Developer/Homebuilder. Each submitted for approval. To gain approval, the Develo builder shall provide a grading plan that shows at a erosion control measures, the existing and proposed 1 elevations, elevations for garage floor and first flo elevations for all breaks in grade for each lot. Als proposed drainage patterns on and across the lot(s) s Also, a $1,000 escrow shall accompany each phase plan in a phase of the grading shall require reapproval. shall be returned upon satisfactory completion of the operations. 7. If and when there is an excessive buildup of mud or d existing -City streets as a result of building or grad operations, the Developer shall have the affected str mechanical means, at the direction of the city. 8. The Homebuilder will be responsible for repairing dam< utilities incurred as a result of building constructic utility installation. 9. If at anytime the Developer is not in compliance with agreement, the City reserves the right to correct the compliance after giving the Developer 48 hours notice, associated with making the corrections shall be chargf Developer. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS i Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor Kevin D. Frazell, City Administrator DEVELOPER Mr. Jack Blesener dividual lots lot must be er/Home- t corner r, and all the all be shown. Any change he escrow grading ets swept by to public or private this areas of non - All costs 4 to the CONTRACT FOR SINGLE FAMILY Job No. Imp. No 8911 89-3 This agreement, made and entered into this day o , 1989, by and between the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, (hereinafter called the "City") and Vernon & Alice Eide, 2458 London Lane, Maplewood, Mn 55118 (hereinafter called the "Developer") W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Developer proposes a plat for a single family d Mendota Heights to be known as Eides Estates Lot 34 Block 1 and located north of Wagon Wheel Trial, West of Dodd Road, and East Court; and WHEREAS, public services are needed by the Developer from Heights in order to proceed with said development; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the two follows: 1. In the event that the City initiates litigation to enj performance of Developer's obligations hereunder, the entitled to reimbursement of all costs and attorney fE in connection therewith, wheather incurred prior to o3 of judgement. opment in 1 Block 2 Rogers Mendota parties as orce City shall be es incurred after entry 2. Developer will provide at no cost to the City all needed temporary construction easements t$ install said improvements and those permanent, right of way and easements, necessary for said public improvements. 3. Developer will proceed immediately to commission a re istered land surveyer to place and maintain enough lot corners so hat street centerlines and all utilities can be located by City �taff. 4. Grading operations may be completed in phases (i.e. it or group of lots) by the Developer/Homebuilder. Each submitted for approval. To gain approval, the Develor builder shall provide a grading plan that shows at a i erosion control measures, the existing and proposed lc elevations, elevations for garage floor and first floc elevations for all breaks in grade for each lot. Alsc proposed drainage patterns on and across the lot(s) sh Also, a $1,000 escrow shall accompany each phase plan. in a phase of the grading shall require reapproval. 2 shall be returned upon satisfactory completion of the operations. ividual lots of must be r/Home- nimum corner and all the 11 be shown. Any change e escrow rading 5. If and when there is an excessive buildup of mud or d'rt on existing City streets as a result of building or grad ng operations, the Developer shall have the affected str ets swept by mechanical means, at the direction of the city. I 6. The Homebuilder will be responsible for repairing damilge to public utilities incurred as a result of building construction or private utility installation. 7. If at anytime the Developer is not in compliance with this agreement,'the City reserves the right to correct the areas of non- compliance after giving the Developer 48 hours notice All costs associated with making the corrections shall be charged to the Developer. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor Kevin D. Frazell, City Administrator 611 191RUDIF102219. Mr. Vernon Eide Mrs. Alice Eide i Z. MEMO Date July 11, 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council, and Cit d ator FROM: Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: 716 Stanwich Pool Fence INTRODUCTION• The Smallidge's have requested to be exempted from t 'e requirement of the fencing section of the Pool Ordinance 503 Section 5.1(7) for existing fence along their south and wst boundaries of their lot. HISTORY• On November 6, 1979 the City Council adpopted Ordina ce #503, an Ordinance Regulating Swimming Pool Construction. Since the adoption of this ordinance staff has been activ ly enforcing the ordinance in its entirety. Two pools and fences have been installed in the Smallidge neighborhood since the adoption of the Pool Ordinance. One at 707 Stanwich Lane and the Smallidge's at 716 Stanwich Lane. he 707 Stanwich pool and fences are in compliance with Ordin nce 503. The 716 Stanwich Lane pool was issued a permit on Ma 27, 1988 to Prestige Pools. An inspection was made by melon June 6, 1988 after the hole"was excavated for the pool. o other calls were made requesting any further inspections. The Smallidge's said that the non -complying fence that w s installed had been done by Midwest Fence. This fence wa installed without a permit or inspection. At the end of May, 1989, the Smallidge's claim they told by a city employee that a 4' fence met the requirem of the pool ordinance. I haven't been able to discover anyone of the staff that can recall giving out that information. The Smallidge's neighbor had contacted Councilmember John Hartmann to complain about the fact t the fence around the Smallidge's pool did not comply wit pool ordinance. Pursuant to John Hartmann's call I went investigate the complaint. I had found the complaint to valid and issued a warning of violation notice on May 26 1989 (see attached). After the receipt of the warning violations the Smallidge's sent the attached letter. were nts at the to be DISCUSSION• Currently the Smallidge's pool is not protected by a complying fence. I feel that it would be appropriate to grant the Smallidge's a reasonable period of time to brin their fence into compliance with the pool ordinance. I a aware that national standards are recommending a minimum three barriers to prevent tragic deaths or brain damage f pool drownings. RECOMMENDATION• As Code Enforcement Officer, I would expect that th fence be brought into compliance with the ordinance as written, including a minimum 5' high fence. That will effectively enclose the entire pool area to prevent the entrance of children, further such fence shall have self closing and self latching gates with provision for locki ACTION REOUIRED: Council should discuss the issue with the Smallidge' then decide whether to require ordinance compliance as recommended, or to grant the requested variance. Council also wish to discuss with the Smallidge's an appropriate amount of time to bring their fence into compliance. may CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 8:00 to 4:30 (612) 452-1850 WAKniIN�; OF VIOLA N /CTop O -RI( ORDER N -, 10-A(�' 5/ I I Date S--�� 7 Name , Site Address /16 Time 10- d7/d/A Notic is hereby given that you have violated a Building Code oning Ordinance e uiremen Nature of Violation. kb &V,4 /J EN GQ !-ks' ,av l Ufa 2 � ar ereby requested to remedy the conditions as stated above within 14 calendar days hotirs of the service notice. lC City as allowed action by lawY you within the ime, further action w be taken bY the �Vl. �� (,9151 Signature by Homeowner/Contractor 716 Stanwich Lane Mendota Heights MN! May 30, 1989 Mr. Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer City of Mendota Heights Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Berg: I am writing to you to request an extension of time beyond the fourteen (1 calendar days for compliance stated on the Warning of Violation/Stop Work Order which you posted on our house dated May 26, 1989, at 10:07 A.M. As I discussed with you per our telephone conversation of Friday afternoon May 26, 1 would appreciate an extension of at least five (5) weeks beyond the June 9th date listed to July 14, 1989, for the following reasons. 55118 1. In order to be in compliance with Ordinance 503 Section 5.1 (7) requiring*a fence of at least 5', 1 need time to secure estimates for installment of the fence and a self -latching gate along the ea5t side of our property. Having immediately* contacted Midwest Fence and Manufacturing Company on Friday afternoon, we have discovered that there is presently a four week waiting period because of the weather and a backlog of orders before they could install a fence. We have found Midwest Fence to be very competitive in bids and have had them do work for us previously. 2. Before installing the fence along the east property line, we woul like to have our lot surveyed to insure that the new fence is accurately installed along that property line. Ul 3. In addition, we would like to request the,Mendota Heights City Council for a variance on the fences currently constructed along the south and west edges of our lot. These fences were installed last June due to a combination of negligence on our part along with misinformation which we received from an employee in the Mendota Heights City Offices. My wife and I have been resi Mnts for over twenty-one years in Merdota Heights and have constantly tried to be law-abiding and contributing members of this community to make it a better community in which to live. We would like to think that we will continue to live here for another twenty-one or more years. It has never been and never will be our intent to purposely violate any ordinance or code. We were well aware of the need for a fence surrounding our pool which we had install d in June, 1988. Although we have discovered within the last two weekthat we were negligent, we feel that we acted in good faith when my wile contacted the City Offices just prior to our pool construction lat May to check on city codes. At that time she was informed that the fence needed to be four (4) feet high which certainly made sense and seemed accurate in light of the fact that the other pools on our Ilock are enclosed by four foot fences. We unfortunately just naturalli assumed that installation of the fence was inclusive in the building permit acquired by Prestige Pools for construction of the pool silce it is mandatory to have a fence enclosing the pool. Even within he past two weeks when contacting the Mendota Heights City Offices, we have also been told twice that we needed a four foot fence. -2 - Thank 2 - Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions we could be of any further assistance, please contact either my wife, Mary or me at our home or by calling us at 454-6009. Thanks once again. Sincerely, Ronald J. Smallidge cc/Mr. Kevin Frazell, City Administrator N 1 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and Cit q�`a PArator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Out of City Water Hook Up Mr. Jerome Mandel INTRODUCTION: June 30, 1 Last year Council allowed Mr. Burt Anderson one of Mr. Mandel s neigh- bors who has a large lot simlar to his to hook up to the Mendota H fights system. Because Mr. Anderson had recently divided off a lot and h d the potential to divide off another Council based his a hook up charge on 100 foot of frontage. nTRnTT99TnN Mr. Mandel, 1770 Delaware Avenue, West St. Paul, would very V h like to have City water at his home and West St. Paul does not have nor will they have a main available for him to connect to. Mr Mandel has there ore requested to be allowed to connect to the Mendota.Heights system (see at- tached letter of request). Mr. Mandel had previously requested t hook up to our system in 1980, however he has a very large frontage and t e costs were prohibitive. He recently learned that Mendota Heights had c angel its policy on Out of City Connections and had allowed his neighbor to connect for a charge based on 100 feet of frontage (our minimum lot size) Mr. Mandel has submitted a survey that demonstrates how he could subd'vide his lot into three 100 foot frontage lots. He requests that the City of Mendota Heights allow him to connect to our water system based on 100 fee of frontage with the idea that we would collect the other hook up ch rges as his lot is subdivided and developed. ALTERNATIVES 1. Adhere to existing policy. Cost to Mandel = 308 (ft. of frontage) X $8.00 (per front foot) X 1.15 (Out of City overhead factor) _ +7% Interest for 19 years = +Water Availability Charge (WAC) _ '2,833.60 3,768.69 200.00 TOTAL 1$6,802.29 2. Grant Mr. Mandel's request and charge him for only 100 feet of assuming that if and when his remaining frontage is split off and d( additional connection charges will be received. Cost to Mandel = 100 (ft. of frontage) X $8.00 (per front foot) X 1.15 (Out of City overhead factor) $ +7% Interest for 19 years = 1, +Water Availability Charge (WAG) TOTAL ACTION REQUIRED: Review alternatives and select a course of action. N frontage veloped, $21,244.29 June 26, 1989 Mr. James Danielsen, Director of Public Works City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria*Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 I live at 1770 Delaware Ave., West St. Paul, and would like to up to the Mendota Heights water system. I hook I made this same application back in May of 1980, but due to te size of my lot and the formula used to determine the assessment, the cost at that time was prohibitive. I It is my understanding that the city has changed its policy for determining assessments, making it possible to be charged at a rate based on a 100 ft. lot. My Delaware frontage is slightly over 308 ft. and could be divided to comply with your requirements. 11 A copy of a survey dated June 29, 1981 is enclosed for your determination. Also enclosed is a copy of my file on the applicatio made in 1988. .1. I would appreciate action on my request at your next council meeting. Thank you for your prompt attention. era M. Mandel 1770 Delaware Ave. West St. Paul, MN 55118 Tel. 457-4286 (home) 450-5031 (business) 1 Certf ff cate of *urbep • FROM *ME OFFICE 01 -PAUL -X WeLAGAN 2}}1lakma Aacnvc X'F.SY S7.T11't. 11 innam.3 arTiaterJ IanJ mnm. Hereby Certify that thio plat shows a sareey erty described on this pint, nod that the corner+ are t and thnt all locatinns. encroachmentn, etc., bare been Saroeyed For Jerry Mandel WAYNE McLA Date. June 29. 30 19$1 Scale I inch - 60 feet _ __.._... .'c 04 U N O Cp V C � w u O w.+1*+E Md.. SON .4•411, by me of the prop- ly placed as shown. Ily xhown. Consultant --_ .,..c�1T1yVOL4....pd Fe+. t ttn�`.�•I ti 114 O' i R O As, :;!I - I Aj A LC C S v " o} o u a a u .x ac o s+ Co a,'0 bolt, 3$ Cn V ,I M .. NoRTO °� r� a� .�••-1 �.—Y---p t='-�AiM�t R�-•AV-1" ---•6: •i�-t Jd Y >+ [5 W. L)wE or SWY4 SWYs, SEc. 17r T: y u u a �f u ac4 . Sw V lw.Ztw.., -�0 O IR Ow E. i1Ttt Or SWAY SW%4, "JEC.1�aT, aN.tR."t2`N. . v. O ...�... __�_..._. ...__ a u w %�I V. o a G u �. _ �. w -Z 717-67 u i - a 3otf.b'! JQ.0-2!'tc"rv. ow o 1 t0 tD U 14 1t In W tU O O H � ' Y. uw rJ L W 1 w 0 u C i�I Z w aw °u 1 N aw u Fn v C C u O W 4 M i K � I fiZ ' Y hQ a• III 11 Lyu N t RI La V)u —I n w '' o I ° t — 0.4 u t to 0 S 2 r� U J �ttre wo R 1. 1J z n u O G GoasYO M� � .. t ttn�`.�•I ti 114 O' i R O As, :;!I - I Aj A LC C S v " o} o u a a u .x ac o s+ Co a,'0 bolt, 3$ Cn V ,I M .. NoRTO °� r� a� .�••-1 �.—Y---p t='-�AiM�t R�-•AV-1" ---•6: •i�-t Jd Y >+ [5 W. L)wE or SWY4 SWYs, SEc. 17r T: y u u a �f u ac4 . Sw V lw.Ztw.., -�0 O 2% MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS July 5, 1989 To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevi�i?oe- - 11, City Administrator Re: Endorsement of Candidacy of Liz Witt for the Regional Transit Board 1989 legislative action restructure the Regional Transit Board. The RTB is the agency responsible for overall planning of public transit in the Twin Cities, including Light Rail Transit, the bus system, Metro Mobility for t disabled, and para -transit alternatives for outlying sub areas. n The 189 legislation created an 11 member board, with eig t of the appointments made by the Metropolitan Council from geographic districts. At least six of these must be locil elected officials. The remaining thrde seats are appoin:ed by the Governor, and are the Chair, a disabled person, aid an elderly person. The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities was required to submit the names of nominees from among elected city officials. Liz Witt was one of the names submitted. She is eligible to represent District H, which comprises Metropolitan Council Districts 15 and 16 (covering Highland Park, northern and eastern Dakota County, and southern Washington County). Liz has asked for a resolution of City Council endorsement and support which can send along with her application materials. F ACTION REQUIRED Motion to approve the attached resolution requesting that the Metropolitan Council appoint Councilmember Liz Witt to the District H seat on the Regional Transit Board. City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89 - RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE CANDIDACY OF COUNCILMEMBER ELIZABETH WITT FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD WHEREAS, Mendota Heights City Councilmember Elizabeh Witt has applied for appointment by the Metropolitan Cou cil to the Regional Transit Board; and I WHEREAS, Councilmember Witt has extensive experienc as both an elected and appointed City official in Dakota Comycommunities; and I WHEREAS, Councilmember Witt also has a long history of demonstrated volunteer service in representing the inter sts of local communities throughout the metropolitan area an the State of Minnesota. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the Council requests that the Metropolitan Council appoint Councilmenber Elizabeth Witt to the District H seat on the Regional Trinsit Board. Resolved this lith day of Jdly, 1989. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEI By Charles E. Mertens( Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk -0 July 6, 1989 Dear, I seek your support for my candidacy to the Regional Trinsit Board. My area of representation would be most of Dako-a County and the south half of Washington County. Many c)nunun- ities in this area are of high growth or of potential hLgb growth. What happens in transportation in the seven -co my metro area will be greatly impacted by and have great inpact on this southeast portion of the metro area. My interest in transportation goes back to my position is a Research Analyst in the Planning Department of the Dep#tment of Transportation. I soon learned that traffic and stret configurations affect every development of every community. Many of us in Dakota County are trying to deal with hot1hyspots that need immediate attention. Also under discussion many of our communities is the decision to stay or opt outf the MTC bus system. Light rail transit is another high pr ority C issue for the metro area. These and other related ite s, S such as metro mobility, provide a full agenda for the oard. fc I have lived in Mendota Heights for twenty-five years and am in my eleventh year as a member of the Mendota Heights City Council. I have been employed as an Administrative AsEistant for the City of Eagan sincia 1982. In addition, I have been very active in working with county,state, metro and otter governmental entities, notably the League of Minnesota Cities and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. T#anspor- tation questions are a part of practically every propoal to come before these local government organizations. I I have a solid background in relationship with many cities Council. I feel I would be a making and ask that you send Sincerely, I transportation and a good .working in District 15 & 16 of the Met positive force in RTB decision - a letter of support to: Sandi Lindstrom Secretary to the Chair Metropolitan Council 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 Liz Witt, Mendota Heights Councilmember PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF ELIZABETH WITT EDUCATION 605 West Marieve. Mendota Height MN 55118 Phone: 612-454r2657 MMA Masters in Management & Administration Metro State University 1989 B.A. Public Administration, Metro State University 1983 B.A. Psychology, University of Minnesota 1956 FXPERTENCE 1984 - present: Administrative Assistant, City of Eagan. I perform City Clerk activities including elections, records management,licensing and interpret the City Code for the general public. I act as Purchasing Agent for the City and supervise front counter activities. 1982-83 : Administrative Intern, City of Eagan. My assigned duties carried through all departments to ensure a broad based knowlIdge of the administration of a city. I coordinated the annual repor , capital improvement plan, the purchases for and move into our new City Hall, and Ci ' ty Code revision. I completed research projects or the Planning, Finance, Public Works and Inspections Departments. 1979- present: Councilmember, City of Mendota Heights. I ad everything that has to do with running a city: Set policy, e goals for governing and accomplish them; review budget, ordin and development proposals. 'Interact with other governmental including the state legislature/agencies, regional organizati county and other city governments. 1973-1981: Homemaker and Community volunteer plus part-time, professional jobs. Most of my time was spent raising childre acting as a leader for many of their group activities and par ting as a member of the Mendota Heights Parks & Recreation Co and Community Education Advisory Council. 1966-1972: Research Scientist, University of Minnesota, Dep 1957-1958 of Psychology. As a researcher, I gathered, ana summarized and submitted written reports of the particular p for publication. 1959-1965: Research Analyst, Minnesota Department of Trans and Welfare Department. Performed traffic studies such as analysis, origin -destination, motor vehicle use, control of design hours; also designed day care surveys, forms and di and wrote brochures for the Department of Welfare. ress tablish nces ntities ns, non- icipa- mission tment ject tation al route cess and tories, page two Elizabeth Witt PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS League of Minnesota Cities: Member of Board of Directors, 1983-1988 Legislative Contact, 1984 to present Revenue Sources Committee, 1980 to pr sent Vice-Chair,1987; Chair,1988-J9 Annual Conference Planning Committee, 987-88 75th Anniversary Committee,1988 Minnesota Cities Week Chair, 1988 Dakota County Legislative Committee 1984-1987 Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Committee -1984 to present Northern Dakota County Cable Communications Commission member and Officer, 1982 to present Metropolitan Land Use Advisory Committee - 1986 to present Government Training Service Board of Directors - 1986 to present Minnesota Women in City Government Board member and officer - 1985 to present Minnesota Association of Urban Management Assistants - 1983 to pre;ent Minnesota Clerks and Finance Officer's Association - 1984 to preseit International Institute of Municipal Clerks,- 1989 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities committee member - 198 It International City Managers Association Associate member - 1984 t American Society of Public Administration member - 1986 to presen References are available upon request. to present present MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS July 6, 1989 To: Mayor and City 'Council From: Kevin F� ,/ City Administrator Re: Promotional Appointments to Positions of Sr. Secre ary and Secretary As Council is aware, my Secretary, Janet Koelsch, resigne from City employment on Wednesday, June 28th. Janet left for a position with 3M. Kim Blaeser, currently Secretary to the City Clerk and Utility Billing Clerk, has applied for promotion to the Sr. Secretary position.' We have tested Kim, and considerd her other qualifications in comparison to the outside applicants received when we advertised the position last Fall. We feel that her qualifications are equivalent, a d her experience in filling the Sr. Secretary position mak her a solid candidate. Therefore, I am recommending her Appointment. Nancy Bauer, currently our front desk Clerk -Receptionist has applied for the Secretary/Utility Billing position which Kim Blaeser will be vacating. It has been our past practice to promote from within when qualified candidates are availa le. Nancy meets the requirements of the job, and has a very ood record of work performance with the City. Therefore, I recommend her promotion to the Secretary position. Both Kim and Nancy would be serving a one year probation period in the new positions. SALARY Attached is a copy of the City's salary matrix. Effec August 1, both Kim and Nancy would have moved to Step their current positions of Secretary and Clerk-Recepti As you can see, Kim's promotion will carry very little additional -compensation. In order to ensure that the beginning salary for her new position is close to her salary, I recommend that she start at Step D, $23,655, eligible for progression to Step E in one year. E lin orlist. lrrent nd be I am recommending that Nancy start at Step B in the Secret ry scale, then be eligible for movement to Step C in six mont s. Her further progression up the salary scale to Steps D an E would be in one year intervals. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with the above recommendations, it shotild pass a motion appointing Kim Blaeser to the position of S . Secretary, with a one year probationary period, effective July 1, 1989, at salary Step D. A second motion would be to appoint Nancy Bauer to the position of Secretary, with a one year probationary peri effective July 1, 1989, at salary Step B. It 'w. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA EMPLOYEE POSITION PLACEMENT AND PAY CLASSIFICATION CHEDULE RESOLUTION NO. 88- , ATTACHMENT A GRADE A B C D E* F G I Clerk-Recept. 15,963 16,761 17,599 18,479 19,403 20,3 3 21,392 ii 16,362 17,180 18,039 18,941 19,888 20,8 3 21,927 ZII 16,771 17,610 18,490 19,415 20,385 21,4 5 22,475 IV 17,190 18,050 18,952 19,900 20,895 21,9 0 23,037 V 17,620 18,501 19,426 20,397 21,417 22,4 8 23,613 VI 18,061 18,964 19,912 20,907 21,953 23,0 0 24,203 Vii 18,512 19,438 20,410 21,430 22,502 23,6 7 24,808 VIII 18,975 19,924 20,920 21,966 23,064 24,2 7 25,428 IX Secretary 19,449 20,422 21,443 22,515 23,641 24,8 3 26,064 X 19,936 20,932 21,979 23,078 24,232 25,4 3 26,716 XI Sr. Secretary 20,434 21,456 22,528 23,655 24,838 26, 79 27,383 XII 20,945 21,992 23,092 24,246 25,459 26,731 28,068 XIII 21,468 22,542 23,669 24,852 26,095 27, 00 28,770 XIV 22,005 23,105 24,261 25,474 26,747 28, 85 29,489 XV 22,555 23,68.3 24,867 26,111 27,416 28, 87 30,226 XVI Account., Eng. Tech. 23,119 24,275 25,489 26,763 28,101 29, 07 30,982 XVII 23,697 24,882 26,126 27,432 28,804 30, 44 31,756 XVIII 24,290 25,504 26,779 28,118 29,524 31, 00 32,550 XIX 24,897 26,142 27,449 28,821 30,262 31, 75 33,364 XX 25,519 26,795 28,135 29,542 31,019 32, 70 34,198 XXI 26,157 27,465 28,838 30,280 31,794 33, 84 35,053 XXII 26,811 28,152 29,559 31,037 32,589 34, 19 35,929 XXIII 27,481 28,855 30,298 31,813 33,404 35, 74 36,828 XXIV Sr. Eng. Tech., CEO, 28;168 29,577 31,056 32,608 34,239 35, 51 37,748 Engineer, Adm. Asst. XXV 28873 30,316 31,832 33,424 35,095 36, 50 38,692 XXVI 29,594 31,074 32,628 34,259 35,972 37, 71 39,659 XXVII 30,334 31,851 33,444 35,116 36,872 38, 15 40,651 XXViii 31,093 32,647 34,280 35,994 37',793 39,683 41,667 XXIX 31,870 33,463 35,137 36,893 38,738 40,675 42,709 XXX P.W. Supervisor 32,667 .34,300 361015 37,816 .39,707 41,692 43,777 XXXI Sergeant 33,483 35,158 36,915 38,761 40,699 42,734 44,871 XXXII 34,320 36,036 37,838 39,730 41,717 43,803 45,993 XXXIII 35,178 36,937 38,784 40,723 42,760 44,898 47,143 XXXIV 36,058 37,861 39,754 41,742 43,829 46 020 48,321 XXXV Pol. Chief, P.W. Dir., 36,959 38,807 40,748 42,785 44,924 47 171 49,529 City Clerk MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS July 6, 19 To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevin Frazell, City Administrator Re: Resignation of Parks Commissioner Robert Leffert, and Appointment of Replacement 89 Parks Commissioner Robert Leffert has given me a verbal resignation from the Commission. Although his current teril of office does not expire until January 31, 1992, his resignation is effective immediately, so Council will need to appoint a replacement. At the time of your recent appointment of Dick Spicer to t) Commission, there were two additional candidates interview, Michael Lundeen, 1824 Twin Circle Drive, and Michael Saege: 1817 Valley Curve Road. Christine Koch, 1152 Sylvandale Road, also applied for the appointment, but did not attend the interview. N ACTION REQUIRED To accept the resignation of Robert Leffert from the Parks Commission, and to make the appointment of a replacement Commissioner for a term of office expiring January 31, 19@! W 'la. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO I TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEVIN yX19PIL, CITY ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: St. Paul Water Utility DATE: June 27, 1989 As Council is well aware, Mendota Heights residents have purchased their water from the St. Paul Water Utility fo well over twenty years. Our residehts pay the 20% surch for "outside the City" customers, as'do residents in sev other suburban communities surrounding St. Paul. In addition, the City of Mendota Heights places another 10% surcharge on the water bills to pay debt service costs o water tower, and to provide for expenses of maintaining local water system. Our contract with St. Paul Water expired 4 or 5 years a and we have never negotiated and signed a new one. St. has, of course, offered to renew the existing contract the 20% surcharge. Many of the other suburban communit are also without current contracts. Representatives of suburbs have been meeting with St. Paul Water Utility M Tom Mogren on an erratic basis to discuss what alternat might be available. rge ral the he I aul th s he ager es Attached is a memorandum from the City of Maplewood, laing out three options that were discussed at the last meeti g. Those options would be: 1. Status quo, each City signing a new 20% surcharge contract with St. Paul. I 2. Creation of a regional water district to replace t e St. Paul Water Utility. This district would serve essentially the same area, including the City of St. Paul. However, the suburban communities would have an equity position in the utility, and representation on the Board. 3. Pursue special legislation requiring that inter - community water rates be reviewed and established some outside source, such as the Public Utility Commission, or a third party arbitrator. . 11 A I CITY OF /MV 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, 55109 OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER f 612.770-4524 TO: Gary Berger, Arden Hills Janet Weisner, Falcon Heights LaVanche Peterson, Lauderdale Joseph Chlebeck, Little Canada Kevin Frazell, Mendota Heights Steven Gatlin, Roseville Bill Craig, West St. Paul FROM: Michael A. McGuire, Maplewood City Manager RE: ST. PAUL WATER UTILITY DATE: June 14, 1989 At our meeting today three options relative to our water contl with the St. Paul Water Utility were discussed, they were: 1. STATUS QUO: Each City remain on a retail or wholesale contract with the St. Paul Water Department 2. Create a Water District to replace the St. Paul Wa t e r Department, that would essentially serve the same area; 3. Pursue special legislation that would require an outsid source, such a`s the Public Utility Commission or arbitr to establish the rates for the contracts. The people present felt that at this time it would be approp to discuss these options with our respective city councils a together again if option 2 or 3 is pursued. Please keep in touch. MAM: kaz Equal Opportunity Employer ,acts or tor, ate get k MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS July 7, 989 To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevin /City Administrator Re: Carpet Pad in City Hall Commons Area Because of seam problems, St. Paul Linoleum and Carpet Company is planning to replace the carpeting in the City all Commons area (see attached letter). They are suggesting hat we consider authorizing them to place a pad under the car et, rather than using the direct cement method of the existin carpet. This change would cost $1,495*, and have the following advantages: 1. Appearance - the "lip" next to the tiled areas wou removed. 2. comfort of walking. 3. Most importantly, extended life of the carpet. Obviously, placing a pad under the carpet would be desir We leave it to Council's discretion whether it justifies additional expenditure. ACTION REQUIRED To decide whether to authorize the expenditure of an additional $1,495 to purchase the carpeting pad for the Commons Area. be the �1_ AND CARPET COMPANY 1505 June 21, 1989 Mr. Guy Kullander City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 Dear Mr. Kullander, We propose to furnish and install carpet type 'B' along with the repla carpet 'A' in the Commons Area, using a Robert's "Mono -Slab" pad syste complete net sum of $1,492.00. This amount represents the cost of pad adhesive to apply the pad and additional labor for this system versus traditional cement direct method. Please note the Mohawk carpet representative has offered to supply car 'B' at no extra charge if the option to use the pad system is selected Mohawk feels this will provide additional performance to both carpets in this area. Please refer to our letter and diagram sent to The Joseph Company, foz of work involved. Please contact me if you have any Oestions. Sincerely, Lynn Hansch f cc: Paul Raggozzino Contractors of carpet & resilient sheet vinyl. An Equal Opportunity Employer T, ST. PAUL, MN 55104 (612) 6454801 FAX (612) 6466083 for a nd e t type ' and 'B' 'Ithe scope .:� • . -r•L .. - -•` _ •7•.Yli. .n {�.-Ri..-.jar J.-.• /. .. •,•\ r: jk- 1:F•j ' orif efence _ . Lunch Room. WOOD G=.C1 1 W?'• lip t0 ��,-�E—TI 'C3 Men Ml A. ns Area I • y, of w1 A l �tl� t �• - , i J- -- - - - - - - -A� Women nitoi ?Lt �+r \'� I ( i A - I CE►u►vc-� -wz WOO D)vi t Conference UCouncilFzzq 4 Vestibule I Chambers • , i Audio/ Vide MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS July 5, 1f To: Mayor and City Council From: Ke F, City Administrator Re: Revised TARGET ISSUES List On April 15th and May 30th, Council held workshops with t Planning and Parks Commissions. one of the purposes was draft a revised and updated list of target issues to guid the work of the City. Attached is the new list, entitled "TARGET ISSUES: 1989/9 I believe this list fairly reflects the consensus of opin that Council expressed at the May 30th meeting. However, will want to review the listing, as well as the implementation steps under each, to determine if any furt changes are needed. The numbering is'simply for referent and does not reflect "within group" priorities. This document also gives a status update on each issue. 189 . If on you er The second attached documen*�'is the old list "TARGET ISSU�S: 1987/88/89.11 On this document I have indicated whether tie issue has been deleted (because it is essentially completd) or where it has been placed on the new priority list. ACTION REQUIRED To discuss the updated TARGET ISSUES list, and direct sta f if any further changes are needed. If not, a motion to formally adopt the list would be in order. TARGET ISSUES : 1989/90 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ADOPTED JULY, 1989 TARGET ISSUE STATUS - 7/1/89 1 -------------------------+-------------------- 1. Immediate Park Development - Establish program of { Program of improveme is improvements { adopted. Referendu on - Hold referendum { 8/15/89. - Secure third community park { site. - Implement improvements I 2. Long Range Park Plan - Review Barton-Aschman 1985 Study - Set program of future needs - Survey opportunities available - Adopt plan of action to achieve desired results V 3. 110/Lexington Redevelopment - Resolve planning issues - Complete financing plan - Work toward implementation of preferred solutions 4. 110/Dodd Redevelopment - Work with MnDot on 149 improvements - Work with owner of Mendota Plaza to upgrade center - Determine future of S. Plaza Drive - Clean up old Fire Station/ Fischer's area Project to be pursu d later, after 8/15 `•referendum (and implementation if successful.) Final plan to be presented to Counci on 7/18/89. Finance concept approved. Center renovations under way. Old fir hall to be demolished in 189. Other issues need attention. 5. Highway 55 Area - Review policy on house purchase' - Acquire homes as requested - Monitor MnDot plan for highway improvements - Resolve planning issues of preferred land use 6. Planning Processes Update - Complete -development and applications of new forms and procedures - Adopt new zoning ordinance - Update Future Land Use Map - Hold orientation session for Planning commission - Develop program of orientation for new Comm. 7. Airport Noise - Participate in Rockenstein shuttle diplomacy effort - Complete Braslau study - Evaluate options available to the City V - Actively pursue best course of action Neighborhood meetinc set for 7/13/89. Currently receiving requests for house purchases. "Prototype" applical forms approved; stat drafting remainder. First draft of zonix ordinance written. Awaiting Rockenstel response. Braslau hired; work on stud begun. I ------------------ ------------------I-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -' HIGH - I --------------------- HIGH PRIORITY 8. Recreation Program - Evaluate community needs - Determine adequacy and effectiveness of current offerings - Determine city role - Work toward implementation To be done after referendum, and whi.' implementing facili- improvements. ion f Le :y 9. Area Transportation Issues - Monitor emerging traffic Primarily a "reactil patterns in and around City priority. Time wil: - Work with MnDot to accomplish[ dedicated as issues highway improvements I arise. - Actively participate in State( Regional, and County traffic( studies and plans - Monitor,IRT impact on City 10. Tax Increment Financing - Monitor impacts of State on-going issue. Sty changes on local use will monitor and re] - Respond to proposed uses as as issues arise. requested - Schedule remaining projects I and plan for termination of District 11. Financial Management - Review investment policy 'Project to be done - Review insurance coverages time permits. Migh- - Review external audit a priority during - Consider need for more winter months. Fee explicit council policies schedule recommenda - Future of financial 4ngt. will be part of 199 - Adopt new fee schedule budget. 12. Infrastructure Replacement - inventory existing status andl Engineering has establish replacement plan partially complete� - Adopt policies on standards inventory. Policy for replacement and use of street replacement special assessment l be presented to Cot - Evaluate impact on City l soon. financial obligations - Consider County turnback program ------------------------------------+-----------------__ ------------------ ,11 be ff be ion it MODERATE PRIORITY 13. Recycling - Expand participation - Implement Comm./Indus. - Resolve compost options - Monitor County activities 14. Commissions - Continue periodic workshops with Council and staff - Role/responsibilities clarification -•Improve staff support - Develop orientation program - Develop appreciation program 15. Street Lighting/Sidewalks - Adopt policy for new and existing neighborhoods - Adopt street light standard and design - Adopt financing policy 1. 16. Economic Development - Evaluate pace of business development - Decide whether City should take more active role - Determine ways to promote desirable development - Adopt program and policies 17. Senior Citizen Issues - Evaluate whether and when programs might be needed - Housing - Recreation - Transportation - Other issues needing to be addressing Program working well Will work with Count on C/I effort, and other cities on compost. Workshops/appreciat to be included in 1 budget. Staff upgrading support. Other issues on-goi Staff suggested policies presented. Council will need decide on further attention. To be done as time allows. Could be c_ some priority over year. Future project as allows and need b more apparent. :y .on 190 iven next I omes 18. Housing - Maintenance of existing To be addressed as t housing stock allows and need becc - Senior housing more apparent. - Moderate cost housing Monitoring activity. ------------------------------------+--------------------- LOWER PRIORITY 19. Drainage Ditch and Holding Ponds - Evaluate magnitude of issue - Evaluate maintenance options - Adopt'program and include in City budget 20. Sanitary Sewers - Continue to monitor evidence of any I/I problem - Consider program of reducing inflow through drains - React to specific problems .V 21. City Ordinance Codification - Consider alternative ways of accomplishing - Plan for and do it as time allows 22. St. Paul Water Agreement - Consider long-range City objectives - Work with St. Paul and other suburbs to resolve issues - Negotiate and enter new agreement Engineering has partially completed study. Complete dui next year. On-going monitoring %job. City Clerk to compl( as time allows. Ma)� addressed in 1990 budget. Meeting with St. Pai and other cities to consider options. Council input on 7/: agenda. ime Ing .te be it L8 23. Watershed Management Orgs. - Monitor effectiveness - Work with WMOIs and other cities to solve mutual problems 24. Drug Education - Work with School District, State agencies, county, and surrounding communities to discourage drug abuse On-going administration. Working with WMO West ST. Paul on Creek. DARE program being implemented for 89/ school year. TARGET ISSUES: 1987/88/89 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ADOPTED APRIL, 1987 -------TARGET ISSUE ------------------------------ TOP PRIORITY 1. Parks Development - Reassess program, priorities, and direction - Secure location for athletic complex - Reschedule date for referendum 2. Southeast Area Plan Amendment - Adoption of noise ordinance - Complete Plan approval by Met. Council and adoption - Consider parks implications React to development proposals Construct public improvements 3. City Hall STATUS IN 89/90A IST ---+-------------------- - Bldg. Committee completes schematic plans - Architects draw up Pl. and Specs. - Let for bid and construct - Arrange and approve financing - Consider policies for operation - MOVE IN AND ENJOY! 4. 110/Dodd Area Redevelopment - Work with MnDot on 149 improvements - Work with Mendota Plaza new owners for redevelopment - Determine future of S. Plaza Dr. - Clean up entire area 5. Airport Noise - Become more active in issue - Resolve corridor issues with Eagan - Adopt noise attenuation ordinance TOP PRIORITY Items No. 1 and 2 DELETED TOP PRIORITY Item No. 4 TOP PRIORITY Item No. 7 6. 7. Hwy. 55 Corridor Study - City Planner completes background - Meet with neighbors and owners - Focus direction and policy - Identify funding sources - Implement preferred plan Zoning Code Amendments - Planner completes background work - Workshop with Pl. Comm. to discuss amendments and set policy - Draft ordinances, hold public hearings, and adopt revisions HIGH PRIORITY 8. Infrastructure Replacement Policy - Inventory existing status and establish replacement schedule - Adopt policy on standard for reconstruction - Set policy on City financial contribution Continue to build sinking fund Consider County turnback program 9. Street Lighting/Sidewalk Policy TOP PRIORITY Item No. 5 TOP PRIORITY Included with Itemi ----------------------- - Develop policy for new and existing neighborhoods - Adopt financing policy 10. Commissions - Clarify relationship to Council - Develop recruitment effort - Develop training program - Define Planner/Staff role - Hold periodic joint workshop HIGH PRIORITY Item No. 12 MODERATE PRIORITY Item No. 15 MODERATE PRIORITY Item No. 14 No. 6 11. Financial Management - Review investment of idle funds J HIGH PRIORITY - Review insurance coverages Item No. 11 - Review external audit - Consider need for Council guidelines( and goals I - Role of Treasurer - What to do afterl Larry 12. Drainage Ditches and Holding Ponds - Review maintenance program and J LOWER PRIORITY beef up as needed J Item No. 19 13. MSA Street Program - Review and reconsider priorities J DELETED 14. Economic Development - Considerneedfor more proactive J MODERATE PRIORITY city role in attracting desirable Item No. 16 business - Structure City program -------------------------------------------------------------- MODERATE PRIORITY 15. Sanitary Sewers - Work with MWCC to get accurate meter readings - Agree on temporary method of measurement - Decide on correction of identified I/I problem areas - Identify and react to other problem areas 16. Elections LOWER PRIORITY Item No. 20 - Review needs and options DELETED - Review optiscan system - Review precinct boundaries - Lobby County for needs 17. Equipment Replacement - Inventory existing stock and establish replacement schedule - Establish reserve fund, weaning off equipment certificates - Include parks equipment 18. Use of "Garrofi" site - Focus on desired future use - Resolve conflict between Comp. Pl. and current zoning 19. Hwy. 110/Lexington Intersection - Redesign and upgrade of roadways - Redevelopment of existing use - Future commercial. uses 20. City Image - Adopt slogan - Adopt logo - City Hall planned to reflect - Employee service 21. Recreation Program DELETED TOP PRIORTIY Included with Item No. 5 TOP PRIORITY Item No. 3 DELETED �- Survey needs, present and future ( HIGH PRIORITY - Assess current program Item No. 8 Plan to meet future needs -------------------------------------------+----------------- LOW PRIORITY 22. MAC Property Sale and Use - Review status of sale to United - Work with developer on use 23. City Code Codification - Determine need - Recodify existing ordinances 24. MIS Review - Review effectiveness of current uses - Consider additional applications LOWER PRIORITY Item No. 21 DELETED 25. St. Paul Water Agreement - Reconsider City objectives - Negotiate and enter new agreement with St. Paul 26. Tax Increment District - Review and prioritize remaining projects - React to specific requests/proposals) for TIF assistance I - Schedule remaining projects and plan( for termination of district 27. Council - Staff 7 Commission Retreat - Study and anticipate the future - Plan and organize to react appropriately - Consider need for professional assistance 28. Comparable Worth - Review City Administrator recommended program - Adopt a program - Begin implementation by 8/1/87 LOWER PRIORITY Item No. 22 HIGH PRIORITY Item No. 10 MODERATE PRIORITY Item No. 14 DELETED --------------------------------------------------------------- -------- LOWER PRIORITY 29. House Moving Ordinance - Amend current ordinance to require developer's agreement with timetable 30. Snowplowing - Review current snowplowing procedures and determine whether to amend to increase efficiency 31. Relationship with Mendota/Lilydale - Identify impending issues - Review provision of services - Resolve storm water runoff problems TOP PRIORITY Included with I DELETED No. 6 32. Police Department - Review problem of high percentage j DELETED of senior officers - Plan for future turnover 33. Fee Schedules - Review existing fee schedules I HIGH PRIORITY (i.e. Parks dedication, Planning, Included with Item No. 11 etc.) - Modify as deemed appropriate 34. Cable Television. - Cablecast of City meetings I DELETED - Design in new City Hall - Plan City programming 35. Employee Benefits - Expansion of cafeteria plan I DELETED - Review possibility of fitness plan --------------------------------------------------------------- ------- BOTTOM PRIORITIES 36. RR Crossing in Industrial Park - Review status and decide 4hen and I DELETED if to build 37. CDBG Projects - Survey potential uses and implement I DELETED 38. Intersection Obstructions - Review problem of obstructions from I DELETED tree, bushes, etc. - Plan to remedy as necessary 39. Senior Citizens - Housing j MODERATE PRIORITY - Recreation I Item No. 17 - Transportation 40. Watershed Management Organizations I LOWER PRIORITY Item No. 23 41. k Housing Policy - Maintenance of existing housing - senior housing - Moderate cost housing MODERATE PRIORITY Item No. 18 ��'� � , . . � � "z d'l � �' oo � a R.on, o V+ � • �� '� ._ .._._ 1 I - �� ! �'i �_ �, � �� . • , ``--`.. � • �� * . - __.J..� y� � t � fl '"�_r il i x . � � 0� � � ` 7 �t{ �.� �� ` ��„ �� o,,r, � �. C� B .;_� � P �'ir -p � ^ : � g � � � t � '�'"�' ��' � • � ��' ` � �/j�{/ 1 t �. , � �M �• � � • . . . V � ' i. • ,; I{ ' � t ,4i) + i ' ! � � I ' ` t � �� ' � ti . t� i 9 . �� , , �,�i � �, , �, .�. o� � �`�-�� ' � �- ' p c�� ( � � y o � �� j Cw � y( z'/ 4� p` Z i � � � � � � � � ; tt i� � � r � ;� �". �� Q � ��, o�'�,r � � � � ,`...�r. ' U�� -�t � � . _ _ I '�� __ _ _ �' '► � �� u �S � `q �. �+' ' • � �� . � ' . �' • ; � �`'+a �. �► � i ,rf � , ., t, C If �t, ,��. �.�,} Z � �� . f %` .;. �� ' �. : � � . t . . ' �, >:. :� • � rt . z ��. j d `.t. �,� (: •.. .+ � , ; f. } y � N � f� � * ._�: �� <<� • . . • � � . � . �1 a « �. ' � .it� xr��. .. . ' - "i: t� � • (�. f�+ ' � , ' . . � . . L,,. • m. ' . . , ' > p� Q ---�-_..-�_ ' , t ` ` • � i " �,,,�_1 ' � �`" . . , � . . , - - ------.._-- _ ' • - "---�„ EyrST, jt ,t�...J��7 r rr�C,'i, '�"'• - "' }' ��"�, , . , ' t+tc�w�, y ss e. V '�, ` • � ,. , � • � � O '`�i ' •t � �\ ��y~�Cf'N i � --_ - ' •. . - �. � ; .z ': .- • . __ � 1 }• ;: �i �, � c � � �.• . � , : . . . . . t „ � n � -1 " � ��'' 1 t ; . � � i 3 . t 1 � 1 l. •, : � . : . : . . .� •� :1'�.j �� . +�• ::l ,t ` t;.�'�i'atsf�y��lef`tl`�� #i,y� ��fi2i:�'.:�i t�:^ rii3L :1�_i'C �iLSI'Cii}.�?i i�i'1 C�:... :�.h.a `� -�'. i. �� : �, ��; }'i r1f t':.F� �fi.ri' � � �.��_�i )?%:t. tl{t'i�:�� , ., �. . .' ..,1�'' �k.11 :1,•�•�.�+i::��; to C.,c r�•r.or�� S . • . .... . , • . . . . - �-. .` . m c t . . / _ � _ — — — — — ---- -- — _' _' _' — — — -- -- — -- ---- — — —... _. _.. — — i �______ ___� —- - •. .�i / � " . � �� . ._` �� ",s " x � � ' � . , -��,� . : • w . �e � _ _ _ . .._ _ ._ — — -- — — ��,oi �' '�� • � — — — — — — —�— — — — — —.� — — — � y,,:{� • � ^`�'� � � `� � j�N . � `, � / C� � } � •� � � � T � • ` / 'a 1 � � � j 1 T i3 ` S Is � . � i � e it��ticzL�3 ir�:� 0 . � � ti . • . � ! a• ' � � s� . . '- � � � b • I � �, . t • � , . : :. . ��; !• ' _.. i,t �v • • � " �� c�� - - - - ��' �I � _ . - � ' -1�{`'? — — —. — -- — ._.. � �'. — — ;� � �'� . t ��'1 .• � � {�. � ► '1t' ( ' i � j � �, � 1 ♦ ;. `�' �' i �j � L •�� !�' � � � ��: � — ---- � � � � " � � t�� t t t � 'i r � . � . � t . --� � „ . . ,�,��, 1 �--, � - i � . „� �� s., _ �-a� � � . �-; � -i � . . ' � �� r �s � -.-• f — - , . , �; _ . � , . �• � � ' � . : � � . ' ' y . • � • � ' , �t i./ /j . � S -� r � � �R i � � �� - � � 0 LEXINGTON AVENUE ° ij O3WRSSV S O m 03 n's2 . n1 O 0 ni In ti CO131 n t0 ti Lo Lo 2 La Lo w 1 Co Gl m n, w 3H1 3O 3N17 H180N 3H1 N CQ oz 0 A • 0 N ] 0 Y 03 punod 4uawnuof uoul 0 n 7 S O Y - Io 'O 7 • n 3- 0 0 • < 6 inch Iron Monument Set Marked 4675 O 01 4 0. 01 0 0 7 0 0 7 7 . In A 7 '0 - re N _ n - O -I- -1 4l -I- • - 121 - n _ 7 Y 7 F - m 3- u Cu • 4 c mT_ (n 7 ti 0 O 0 7 O 3 O -" l 7 n F n- Y Y 0 01 n 7 0 F O. m - - Y n • Y m Y Cu 4 7 • 4 m 7 4 Registrar of Titles, Dakota County, Minnesota 10 I hereby certify that. this instrument was filed in the office of the.Registrar of Titles for record on this _day of 989. at o'clock .M., and was duly recorded in Book on Page 838WRN 1N3W11700 838WRN 31VJ1311833 1 z ONY 39VNIV80 .1' r • r, NO°3240"W *E(NORTH)* 210.00 - fn CO tO•w el w _ I 2 N • r...- IIL.. I� )t. rer 0 4, 3 3 A 105.00---15sr---105.00--- N IS I L_ ------J5 s 105.00 CO CO Ut 9' O r-- s� 105.00 0 0 NC/32140°W L. NO°32'42 " W 210.00 NF 210.00 0i 0 3 105.00 105 00 110 iof------',5 P4 0 ° NO°32'40''W *004511.4 co 0 N ISI I a w O 210.00 N) w O 0 Igo lel -- -_J5 �\ l°� 15-5.0O /5 /• �L- 105.00----� (i / 1 - - S 0°32'40"E *CSOUTH) * 210.00 - i‘ v • J/ y rn /• /i " sow"w -0 / ^ \ 0� W r /s.‘•'''- .> * ua+Ipny ':4unoJ e4oie0 No delinquent taxes due and transfer entered this I �w1 r ,1 r M� r ` O On a- C 0 7 Y + < n-4 C T 3 m Y c n l 3 ] n ti O Cu 4 m O co to it(1S3M) it w W O 0 1 (1 'tit, lr. Sig4 uo pagiiasap puel a Cu + m u ALICE LANE SUBDIVISION have been paid on Gary H. Stevenson, Dakota County Surveyor East CO E0 WAY S 0°32'40'E *( SOUTH );F Line of Sec. 35, We do hereby certify that on the day of m tp the City Council of Mendota Heights, Minnesota approved this plat, X 0 + n m O l 3 < ta C u 00- • n rn Xc 0 '0 O. X- 3 l O n Y 0 m e,osauulp 'A,unoj V10)IV0 30 A1NROJ Y10S3NNIM. 30 31V1S h 7�1L'. 210.00 T•0. 29, Cu v, 7 0 n 'n 0 0 n 'o 0 44 c n- u < n - O l ju O el N n O l Os -� a re on. u - n 3 0.. 0. Y N 7 m n x- 2 2 O O 3 - n os 4 Us 0. 3 < n •N w 0 0 0 - • n n 77 0 n 'n0 0. -. n 3- u UI 4. ? 14.1 (11 m 0 7 0. o O Y co to O Y -. - 7 7 u Cu 7- + m n remnn - o 0- 13 -l< o. a (40 n + O n n 7 +l m C -f. lin Ile-; 7 0 < + Y l 7• u. (e Y Os u +0. 3 _ Y < - n m 1(5 O 0 O 7 7n N n-4. 0 7 3 -a 0 le (5 ( 00 • n < n + u n Y - C m<cm Oa ` 0 O n +- 1 n ?m 4 m -a 0 -r Y CrC re 7 m 4 n (5 0.m 'o o �a S 00 m 0 0. C n 01 X • H � Os < 0 - In m O u l(e (5 (5 0 n n • 0l 4 3 l -. u • A Cr - Y n 0. in ? + 0 +< Y n Y (n.Y 0. (5O7S (5 O 0 3u 7-c a n + O - 1 u 3 m + + a Y 0n 3m O CO u 3 Cr O 0 X.. (4: m 7 l < 3 a n It 01 u C m 30 l 4- n n C to O 7 - l 3 • 2 n 0. • + Y Y In 0 14- 0.. CI 0..o n +Y N 3- 10 u O + m 0a 0003 0. • + m /-L_1'✓L_ D I n l,rr_ L7 L. /-:., V 1- -I --00'£9£ W co co O O Rge. 23 V10HV0 30 AlNROJ a l n u 4 o. n (n 7 Y m n 0 X7 + J W 0 O (e N m '0 (0 l Co n C nm n l 3 u n Y - S 3- - m J 3 O 03tn O -4 n 0 l a O l 01 14- 0 0 3 4uawnu4Su! CD b r r r; • 1;G,•D1 S0°32'40"E -*(SOUTH)* V10S3NNITI 30 31V.S BLESENER BUILDERS, INC 7 3 . N CO 01 'o . n 0 l 0 O l m O 3 3- Oa En n Cnm c CS - 13 0 l n 01 n 3 ti 0 0- n N b 7 n 0. 0- < L m n a 0 0 3 o < l l < a CO N a n 0. 0. u _ C N n 4 - C < (5 Y O ▪ u l < a < n Y 0 Y r0 Cr Y (A C C c l O < '0 0 7 - as m 0. n • a m 0. 7 Y 4 m 0: u m O In 0. a • r- - - n n m m re a Y.m In 0 030 0 In - n (3e to 3 U 2 • cu tn to S 4 O 0 3 s n 7 N Q Y < u - O 0 01 - m n + m O 4 l 4 4n m 4 -.n J m Y 'p n n m aY C n 0 � n. r7` ff o_ 7Y ' !' cry 5 S '5 n^ Sh° gal 0 ° 4•'a 450.00 ID 0 N (n1 M „££ ,££ 069 S < x O 0 Mln-, La-( z �-'•F n F ▪ a n -- n n 3--.nl.1SO n k n n n' 3 a O3 3 r ++Y Y n +0J 0 3 +< (n 0 10 `< -1 `? 7 4 nit -I O 7 u . F+ -. n n 2 T C Y tn 0 r In -- N Y l + y It n n co 3n ?3-z < 2 Y l nCO- a�°.-1. 3p30.oim mo(<Yl4;--.-: O1 -. .'<IIIt\\\p��n Y2m+wm p-.1401 70 0. o -1,2<m m7 `30 n -. 14 x Rs Ol -. N 4 -- 0. --a u ((i( n• -~ 3-tn� Y?Y m p -F 2 3 `� -. -� 10a, +n O 0., m (n 3 O KYT-A J (np + I U -.n 4 N (133-- r -1 (0 13n p N•c �. `< 0 J m mon ?M 077 +++ -i- n l 33 • 1: + -.a 7' W n Y J- 30 -. 7 to ___-1 (0 - O 3 + -I 003 + NI:) ---/ O - (0 U 0. ▪ -t n n -.. O v o (7e O m -.F l 3 0 Y4`�++ C 7 7 0 0 +- n 0 J n '0 0< Q++r + +l +'O 7 7 -•� - O n. C. Y l ? 314 7 m7 CZ - Y (5 47 +4 J S0. SOm0M n n '0 n 4. 7 ! l cl m n N u - 3 (-34 O -4-?3t- (n l -I c Q 2 (0 ?Y l 7 7 n Y 73r O (0 '- (nn ry3 S 7 4 + (4e z, 0 o. 3 -1'D 0 3 u 0+ +• 7 Os Y N F n l n l n -O O -I -1 +< 0. NO -,0 F - 7r 0 C., CFen ono +-- < -I. 3 7 Y C 0.0 Co ; 7 n n Y< C • Y W 7 n 3' • - 0 4 S On (70 0 7 lb 3' 7' O n n l -1 u + n -. Cu F 0. n n i O r n • (0 Q. r -. m r l 3 m • n O 7 _ Y u O • 0 (0 N O Y ? Y0 b 3- O O n, 7 '- ((5 l l m -. • 3 3' n -t E W In N O?'O NF• - 7 ?�. n 7. O O -«`G l(5? J • 3 ` 2 'b 42- O n n - c n n -. .43 Y] 7 F -4.� ° n rb in'o n Cal! m +I: + l J Y o Y• Q. Z' u O (o i m Y m Inn le:: m 4 n • 20 (e a+ m a 3 m n n -I - ` a 7 0. 7 in -; (5 l , `l (4n Y rT 7 n 0 N Y 4 0 m b l k.tim 7 ie cr (. < l • 0.Y -t-t0.F CO -1 0 ll O ".. n J (ln S -. n n tint Y l 2-I.m 7:n < 0 n C Y u c1z -, COX1 I + 0;1;4 0. Y 0. 0. 3-- -, + O('"14tin J 2N �'.n n fb w O n 7 k `m m n Y-. J N Y + 'y 7 n .10 n + kg r n m r z rn NOISIAIQEJflS 0 0 z L i i mx5 T /1.44/4, �o r' // P ' c,,l 04, t o A • N 88°52' 21" E 145.00 25.00 20.00 PAR S1!�mksS 0°1 '5 ' E C-/ w' //r7Pa 71 • 5 I Z5 00- I ss4,a o� _ • • 95.00 PROPOSED DIVISION LINE ()-1— I F.-) n / IDI t �. PARCEL 51 '-DRAINAGE AND A 2D CD (45 1 5.00: 23 1G / „ v 2000 (>- N 88°52'21" E UTILITY EASEMENT " 0 DEMARS • GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lane No Ptyrnouth MN 55441 Phone: (elt) 569.0008 57.94.. S 88° 52' 21"W f�eV/ - e 9 /9.0V I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described and and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, end all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land As surveyed by me this ,/ 11-4 /* • EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 2, Block 1, VALS ADDITION PROPOSED LOT DIVISION Parcel A Lot 2, Block 1, VALS ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof; EXCEPT that part lying easterly and northerly of the following described line: Beginning at the most northwesterly corner of Outlot A, said VACS ADDITION; thence South 0 degrees 31 minutes 58 seconds East, assumed bearing along the mort. westerly line of said Outlot A and its southerly extension a distance of 30.00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 52 minutes 21 seconds East a distance of 95.00 feet; thence South 0 ac'<,rees 31 minutes 58 seconds East a distance of 105.01 feet, tklence North 8.8 degrees 52 minutes 21 seconds East a distance of 5.00 feet to the east line of said line there terminating. Arec2 3Z,7 c: � c7 Parcel B That part of Lot 2, Block 1, VALS ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying easterly of and northerly of the following described line. Beginning at the most northwesterly corner of Outlot A, said VALS ADDITION; thence South 0 degrees 31 minutes 58 seconds East, assumed bearing along the most westerly line of said Outlot A and its southerly extension a distance of 30.00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 52 minutes 21 seconds East a distance of 95.00 feet; thence South 0 degrees 31 minutes 58 seconds East a distance of 105.01 feet; thence North 88 degrees 52 minutes 21 seconds East a distance of 5.00 feet to the east line of said line there terminating. Aroma; /97�� 5y �T Parcel C That part of Lot 2, VALS ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying westerly and northerly of the following described line. Beginning at the most northwesterly corner of Outlot A, said VALS ADDITION; thence South 0 degrees 31 minutes 58 seconds East assumed bearing along the most westerly line of said Outlot A and its southerly extension a distance of 30.00 feet; thence South 88 degrees 52 minutes 21 seconds West a distance of 25.00 feet to the west line of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating. Area: 750 sq. ft. Pe 6. 1919. u Minn. Req. No. 94'4'41+ File No 5907 Book •. Page Scale 50' PROPOSED LOT DIVISION PREPARED FOR ARTHUR KUROSS z 0 0 0 0 z 0 U W J J 2>ab J f-- z of Mendota N row 3 0 L N it .,1 -0 i.) 1J >. • W 1) 0 4 N 0 0 • C c C - C N O A ro 01 (-, O 0 3 � 0 -c 0 U 401 O - • >, w CC C 0 ro .0 C a 0 OE 4 U 0 >0 c ro ro ca no; ' a - 'd .+ ro- 4 4 .c 0 0 N cro L, -) d) U ro 4 f+, C it; Q1 ILr 4 1-) C '0 O '0 0. N W W E O --f.1 O C ro ro 4 >, O C 4 4.) ea - 0 0 W '"0 0A c • U 0 •4 0 01 • 0 01 a RI0 -y) H C 4 0 O --1 0 N 01 01 ,-) C 0 0 • -1 4 J-) C 4 .0 CO 4 C O 4) £ a .g 0 >. 0' E A ro re F acknowledged ro U O -0 u N 0 it 4 O J-1 4 C '0 a 0 C 7 'O Xa 4 s ) 0 N ro u '0 4 0 > 0a - lJ U >, 4 0 >, 0 0) 4 1J 'ca a0 a) 7 E 4 .0 C 0 0 a 4-)U '0 0 0 ro 0 )J r O A -0 0 0> a 4 CW , 0 .. -,c N 4 'O 4• 'O 3 0 U O 0. 0 s 0 U w 0) 0 1) (0 W 5+ o JJ 0 (0 .-, 0 r0 H JJ 7 L -C •-I 0 al 1, 4) o co a 4-' 0 C C .H a 0 41 ••4J£ 4 L F W W O 0 Z 0 0 0) fL) = 4 U) 4 0 Z ro tlCa c Ii 0 -1-1 a 0 J 4-1 4 --IV - 0) u () ❑ 0 C U) 0) - 0 ro C W 0 (0 Q ..1 S W L E- 0 U) 0 - _x .� >' a O N W >, 5 .,I ❑ a 1) X 0 C C (0 N W W 0 0 2 4 0 a 0 ✓ U . C >, UW 4411) -O ICS 442 4 C Cr) 4) JJ at r0 7 4 0 a0 1.1 0Y - • H 0 0.c 10 a W C Q CO 0) 4.0 a' a',-) O c Z a C W 17 City Clerk '0 0 > 0 4 a a 0 0 0 A N ro .0 4) re 04 N .� .0 4) r> 01 rn .-1 Minnesota. My Commission Expires 4 0 a) > 4 7 (0 aJ C 7 0 0 4J 0 etsC 0 0 N 0 0 > 0 +J U) >1 4 U 0 4.)4) 4 -00 w I> to s o z � o H 4 F ro H 0 0 >. C 0 _❑ I 4.3 Z 4 0 01 0w'H w (0 N 0 >4 0 a 4) _c 4-) (0 H • A 4) --1 W 4 _0 0 0 1) -0 .l•' H 0 '0 c i L C Jr U JJ N 44 aJ 0 U >. 'D U 4 4) RI 0 0 c 4 4 3 A 4 0 0 4.c -•4 4 U 0 01 4 0 c 0•- 003c .c It 0) .0 N Cll c D NJO ro.1 N H L .-1 > 4) 7 44.4 4-I 0 a. O 00 U .0 •-• a ▪ a 4 CO 0 4 4 JJ 20100 4 N H U 0 C'O 0 t E ro c _C 4-) 0 7 c (0 4..) 4 C 7 -I 1) ft 0 0 ro ro E A W 0.0 N 0 4 JJ 0 H 0 3 4 U'H'O (0 -C roti 0 Z CO 0) c a co JJ 4) 4) N CO 7 0 23 E- .0 0 4 C 2 JJ (0 ro C 0 O H '• C 0 ro Q 1J N 4 • 0) >, O (C)0 0 1) _C O ZaJW it 4) 0 > 0 ro .0 L 4 U t la 1-) 1) N 7 W 4) 10 (11 U) 4-1 - N O CO >, 3+)'0 > 4)0)0)013(1 r0 > s .c c ro .0 H 4 J.) N ro .0 7 'O lJ N 0 N - >• 4r 444 W> O ro ro 0 ro H .c C 'O HI X .0 7 0 a4) +-)S .0 7 0 F W 0 0 W 0 o r001 .0 ▪ 0 -.I z c ro a) 1) 0 0 C r0 4 01 1) X 0 c O ro 4-I 0 41 01 U )0 0 r0 .i 4) J-) W C a) N >, ro C -'- 4.4 0 .0-H0(1 It '0 0) a N '-1 'O C )-I 0) 0 01 0 0 W 4 J.) U •.I .0 .0' aro ro N r 0 .i --I 0 O H 1) 4 04 2'O W 5-4 0 In >.01 0) 0 > 4 7 fno Z 'C) C 0 ro o a -4 J-) 5- 01 O 4 > 4) (0 CO t .-4 4 00 cc •ro W 0 co co 0 0 E c ro-; P-.) O 0 - 0 N m N .0 N '-I 4.) ro -0. 0 X 4 rn>4 (0 0 4 ro 0 0 a1 U 0 0 (0 -+ Y .'., (15 J.) ro O a rtl W al a) 0 0 JJ .. co O C S 'a a 'O JJ .se W C a) V(0 0 0 ro ro 0.(0 0 A C 0 (0 CU ro 4 WW 0 JJ .,.I (13 a 4 01 0 O o ' 0 4) > O J= u aJ 'O >. a: C '4-J ° • .i c H 0 0O v1 -'-1 0 .0 r0 •.1 Y 'O 10 3 0 O N -J O -0 0 0 N .0 0 4 4 C 4J - W 01 4 CD c J= a 1) O N .- C ro C v 0L H--0 CJ 1- 0 •0 w r0 >, a • 01 .4(t) .'0p Z 0 r 4 0 L>= E N > 7 > ▪ Oro -m - c -- C 0 ▪ 4 - 0 4 O 0 1) 01 0 0 01 E 0 0 "H '^I a '0 7 .0 c 7 a) N'-' 0: 0 0 lJ ro c C N C o 7 O 0 r0 • >_C X 0> O T 4> 0 L1-1 ^ 44 0' J= N 0..... < _C 0 7 CO W 4.4 01'O 7 C r0 4 C. rc r0 - O C U. 0 o C r0 Si c C c.- 0 0 0 N C 0 0 (0 C 4 0 01 -) 7) 0 0 - 44 0 0 7 71 7 0 _7 4 _C -- (es c - a) G] C 0-I4J 1) 0_c 4) 0W L U W �, JJ 0 W ..0 0 -,4.) (0 N 0'0 0W 0-0 v .cJ J H 0 L 7 Q 0 a 0 C • 0 1.) N • O) .. C 0 0• C CM C c N• '0) 3 C -1 0 r a: ,, c � 0 0 0 >' 0 0 >, a 0 '� 0 r 44 0 L 3 4 W 4) -0 >' U -0 0 0 c 0 0 o r' a a 4 L .0 1) 10 > JJ 0 aJ r0 ro 7 0 Q 7 0 4-44.40) 0 .-0 O -1a) O O r 01 N a a r0 N ,-, a: N J 0 0.-1 4-1 4 0 -'j 0 aJ c c a: >, w 4400 U-C000c- a-4 N N JJ J E a11) 4 X £ 0 3 7 0 r JJ C O E1X- - c�) 41 L0 • ro - 0 J-) (0 7 0 >''O .. O 0 L W -..I 0 1 U 3 N 0 3 4: H 4.) L 4 0 C 0 w H ▪ (.1 • 0 U (.0 Q U 0 C due and transfer entered this ro 0 - 01 ro • °1012 3 'H °c . o Y H U 1) ro ro 4 N 4.) (0 N 01 3 ,4 O 0 J-) fZ (0 U r0 •-, 4) w 0 N W W 0 4 0 C O c ro £ N 'a 4 0 O > > rt) O .0 > 4 4 0 7 N 0 (1) -NO .0 Cr) 1) • ^C - 1 0 O E N 01 0 O O E 4 4 0 • O 0 w w 01 -C1 A F N N F 0 (0 W z z E X 0 0 N F Z F O (0 Minnesota County Auditor, aJ C 7 0 0 0 W L' CO J) O 01 U r4 .4 w W 0 0 4.) 0 W 0 C 0 w C 0 w N ro 3 0 0 m c J W C 0 O 'O E > 0 �� 4 a) 0 N U C 0 --4 4 N >. ▪ .-1 -C N 7 1 •H 4) A 1J 14 N CO 3 3 4-+ 4 0 'O >. U C w 0 (0 --1 4 yJ • • c 0 0 . • U W >. C A 0 Y E 4 4 0 7 0 0.-1 U L U U 01 O • c< - 0 a ,• ▪ '> ( )• •M `, ( I �.' / (v; \ ,e • NI, A• ro ) •11 J. N •• C ` 1v, c E My Commission Expires --, 0 N 0 O 4 4 U zaa c • O > c Lfr ( 0 1) 4 W 4 (0001 ao w 0 C U) H .i 4 a 0 4) ro N ro 4 > H 7 U 0 s r . UV > N roC >, 0 .-I 01 '0 > 'O C 0 0 0 Z a N F - X 4 r0 O 0 4 ro C N U (0 purposes ro 4) 0 (0 a C c H E C 0 0 U 54 iM ti S_ 5-4 re._ >, O 0 4 JJ 4▪ 4 - 4 44 24 7 .r >- ro L 0 p ro 0 U - la a.0 4 7 E Q O 0 `0 0 X 'O U "0 c 1-) 44 c 4; ro rC 1C '0 c a) 41 C P Ti J.) Z 4) r0 .,.I 0 (0 01 a co > 0 O ro 4,. cc w >roro.-, '0.0) 4 0 r0 4 7 O r 4 0) 0 N .-a 'O 'O JJ O 0 4-I 4: c . 4 f.. N 0 J0 10 0 0 a) 2 O 0 w C T1 >, 41 r0 JJ 1.1 >-, JJ rC N '0 ro ro N 4) ✓ c 3 0 E 0 .c a 44 0, 10 ro 01 O N H CO 0 0) 0' A .0 N 0) C 0 0 1) A Ju N L 4 0 3 r-) .,-1 SD ro C ,c '6 .0 1) O N 'a 11 0 (0 N 0 N C 0 N N C 7 0 - 3 C 7 4 O a) O J- 17 0 0 Uro 0 0) U C 0 N N ( 4 N ro c u m (1' ro (1) ro H _0 a FEDERAL LAND COMPANY a partner 0 O 0 U • c 0 C 4 0.' a partner c 0 0 U Martin F. :/) • rl Li; LL 0 SOUTHERLY LINE O 0 N m N - p -7 w W 0 1- a / <l 490 EXCEPTION ()) 02 m (0330 8.£11) m (038fSV3IN) 311Zb1bIo0S -Z1£1I- W N -- 1 , x L1J a E VICINITY z 0 F w z 0 4- N 0 z 4 N c-1 Y ac a a W W 0 0 w W U ver O 07 0 IoM z a) J - CO x H 7 0 N N m N 02 W W LL 2 0 0 N 0 n O 0 O N In N O N .0 Z +J O L 7H rJ O F N H C C l 0 A Q co 1J 01 O C C Z ..I O 0 4 ✓ ro F () (0 Co A W • u) 4 a 0 waw O H N rn .� C >+ N > ro '0 H A ro CD (0 F X N '0 o ea ✓ Z E ro 7 w 0 N 0 N N 7 • (0 0) 44 C N (0 C.5-1 (13., <-43a L!_ 0£ 13381S 0 0 8b)H±VMV(14 91'b9 00'0£ O O N S6'£bl a 6°12:2:5 00'0£ t 0 W 0 C' 0 v N N 0 N 4) C 0 7 c 0 E C O 4 N 0 J-) 0 C 0 O Denotes iron 0 • 2 MI1917,St>00 S 00.99e v 0 0 0 9 L 1 27 • b a1 ro 0 •H • a) C ro O ro H 0 '0 U 0 N •ti .4.nro O 'O'O U C ro •.4 01..i 'p c a c --4 0 0 .-4 C N ro . •H 0 O 3.0 N n 4 4) --4 O 0'O 3 ro Jr -.1 4 .0 0 3.00 ->) c 4 O (0 .i 0 -4 N 3 0 4) N -I 0 N c 0 0 7 LI -I H C 4) co O 7 0 0 • v co N C 0 01.,-1 U1 '-1 0 4) 01 .0 0 C 4 0 -1 ro'O 4 0 0 C +1 Ca 4 RI co c .H 2? 8 '921 '£1 '03S b/I 3N 3N11 1S1/3 3„IZ,I2.0N 60£b9Z -- 990121-, J 3 a M -n wW 0 N ›- 4.1 w Z U 1`£b Z££1 I 10 to • ir> ,^ L/ W 00.0 ) 0 n 0.41 -- O O d (0 • •i • 0 0 O 3„10,b1.0 S r M 99'191 • - I r() - • es r ' 0 0) Cr L_1 c V I_-_ 3„10,171•06 r L l ci LL. N 171'661 3„I0,bI.0S CO 0009 "6 *PO. ,r2 0 •S, ' 19'b91 M„IL,s9•I N coL_ W (//J ti N Lift -OO) N ,N /n n V n 1 J IO v .. Oe es a / •4 _0 0 0 P b n �S v (n 0 51, 0 1 ,'4/r L/• O z . Nb ain 1/4;€4, • cr LL 10 L Z'Zb l „b£,e0.9 N .90 /41 • 01 0 0 0 N 0 O 0 1) DRAINAGE AND 011 Lai irr • 0 6 u) WUJ 27 • ri od Nx 0 L*; o0 J d 7 • i O_ ro r 0 cn 0 C7 Cn r < 17 R w rr w r•11 7' rt w a Cn @ w @ rt D r•t rt @ 0 w U) a It rt O C @ 7 M11 w 0/ ha* X m a cr H. `C `C [n a 11 rt C M n w 0 < cn C rt @ o a 0 '< rt 0 N t W 11 PI C tf rt 5 aw 7 a @ @ rt C 0 £ 4 t< In CL �1 r• @ 0 @ 11 't M (hi @ 0 r• O 11 rt CA R rt r rt @ @ C £ (tbEn O. 0 n m lot ..fe4n_ T C k 4if w G•'C/v wale: 9"vcv San. — x -HUNT -ER- 10, m •\ 4 f -LANE ; I - I 7; be a1adiand as street4y%ts s ,4'a' i - 26~. 37\- 3 -. Steven_ W. Whita4'er . a- PHILLI PS H ILL ADD. ; E�� • x / % o.d aaterJs/ ,P : /174,///P, /1,1/ Add-) 9/43 } / lc I 1 , 9/1 - v V klI I 1 X3i1aao Xgaaaq 1/4 Solid contours indicate proposed grades. 9.2/ 04 u p 0 0 n U p N / //o. 39 9/7S H V - _— _23-1.37, - Ari5 it r "4iy; hill rr 00 rt 0 @ r r r Cr vl .C- mm @ C N ui R M11 "0 a T1 H 1 ED o w w o w rxo N rt g rt R rt rt a ch z in th £ r'i c 0@ E R E o E7 @ o O o o w@ w@ r 0 O 7 r• M 0 O. 11 C 1t C m cn N cn A) a @ r In rt R R R rtR R R a '0 r rt rt w 7 7 7 7 I-. cn 7 m o w0 n.r-@ r 11 n 11 u n n 11 R C@ m 0 x r• s r• z CYO R 0, 11 O a 'O H 7 r• 10 O ZZ @ ,D 10 CO CO 10 Cb W R O r1 @ y r 0 qD qO 0 CO ,O 11 g @ r•Rb ,ro M r N O, CP, NJ • • a .Q a a@ 0 w VON r -' V r D- 0 O n @1t a by R O 4O 4S V V N N 0 Vl r. w rt D. 7 1'' @ rt rt 0 0`< 0 r• M M MMM M M 0 VI `G g. M O E ;_' N @ @ @ 0 @ @ O -i 0 0 x 0 r• CO • -0 rt rt rt rt rt rt R a O M 11 0 r 11 < I-, N r' H,ti rp 11 r 7J rt 0 R r. 1-1 Cn a a 0 rt rt cn R ply rr £. r--' M a R < O @ w r Is] rt O R @ < 11 r by r•rXrt @ N QQ C @ P--' 11 0 aomR a 7 !r: rRbo,wH. • 7 7 0 1rt cc rt*0r~1-• O P 0 0 N p 1t r • '< O 1n R `••/ H. CT O M f<D rt cn 10 1w-+ O o 11 @ R a M K r 0 O O. 0 ro 0 Ob a 0 0 W rt a rt . n w I@ 0 ': O' R O n W W 0 M 7 1-1r• 0 11 w @ @ GO rt Cl. • H @ g 7£ S R 0 w R t@10 ED ry I'3 @ w 11 b 1:,O w 7 M R R 1+.M @ r• r• 7 1 @ Cn a rt a `< a 0- /.29 w 11 asn pasodoad s4oj 6ZZmeg aZ2u1s Z 0 2u3uoz auaaan3 11 @ 0 v,rrrt rt O 0 w 11 rt R r @ @ N r ro R r cn w rt 1-• 1 1 CO I V W r V In O N W O, N CO O O A n n n n ,• L -c z m 0 D • 30' grew'ram Y D 0 m - 3D — n I110.00'ti Act.. O O O r £ww w C N F F O OOOO rtW��< 9999 d @ n n @ @ V1 tow r1 c-1 `< • V R • T 0 ,. . ( 1 • 0 11 ON itw (3 0 CrC 9w r r <QG a @ w r C a @ r0 2••< H @ w 7 0 N R rt r• E 0 r It ] W m O` R N • O V • 0 a ° 1 f0 W N @ r CO rt M z 0 0 M M JO rt rt N @ @ W £En 0 0 C rt rt rt 7 N N 0 O R N3 N O W Lno n v1 C O n HI M @ CA '< @ rt O M r• M R R cn @ £ O 0 Rzcn w 0 R • n rt c.0@ N N lr rt O tti C It R rt @ O It M O rt M N uoildtaosau c 1 - 1 r D z D� CIn D � o o _ D H 0 z .....„1,14 """' 80NN N m N O z 0 6 z N cr w 1- z V u) SOUTHRIDGE O '',.n 0...1.. .0.-0 rn T U O 3= . U A =C C f . C VI wTs = a 0a a n w a « ; O N Q CC .01 y N O A L N 0 O 03,.1 XI — L N ON o . S . yr1 Cj L= n W ia J S C a2YH uLs L .',1:31Lt _ o nea - 0 O•v a y c.0 0 w O 0 U A y 00 « m L L O 9 r..... • Os cG Y et o u a0 - 'a • o c x p O O a - a o y E v 7 a i U O 9 .0 U O q A a -O` .2 2 Lai H O c W Op C N 2O • u m = T these presents to be signed by its proper officers this Minnesota corporation, has caused LAND COMPANY, a in witness where said NORTHLAND NORTHLAND LAND COMPANY N LLI m 0 L 0 a 1.1a c o .0 0 13 4-1 onS. pO .1.1 G S na 6 _ 2. u O CO Oa 0 0 ^ 2 0 a '0 foregoing instrument was acknowledged a 0 L C H A County, Minnesota V v t 4.1 L V L = y a 4;,. a a G'0 6 c � N p 3; O2 n • Ea' Z a ~ 4 C 0 0 a' L L q � Y g„.;.2 L =22 W � M 2 W qa+ u = N t N a m L x o iO w c a = a ¢ c o 1-43 O a O N a vf2 D a.i C A A O� _N 0 t a a a+ .+ 0 C v D 0 L ;18 u m a O T N Yad C L a I- 3 u A 228-.2 5 a 9 t q N va .- a q � t N 9 � L L t V ; N ~ o C N a ; O N t N L N 9 � N C N q A a+Lt O N t r j L �S O C L t a a u A T C V' a a a v a a aL L V t O. a a — L nG 19 by Edward H. Sande, Minnesota Registration 0 a County, Minnesota O .3 O We do hereby certify that 0 aft i Cc. 0. a L N L t u N 0 4.1 O Ol u 0 O cn v O O o = i 0 an E CITY COUNCIL OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, 0 the Board of 0 for the land described • No delinquent taxes due and transfer entered this sa a 0 DOCUMENT NUMBER 0 O u W v oL 41 4_3 • N • n w 0 0 O O a 3 N 0 em an r r 5 2, D = O U u y « L t � as V q = Ca D U C L = N _a U0U t' - -Iw0 2 N'-:1 N 0 MWm w 0 1-04 1.2 a Fa- ONO w wY 0ZZ OO i 0 2_OS ry - _1wm z =L'+a w N w FO 7Q W 0-O (..)QS41.4 ) = 0- LI W7 00 1-010- z 0 z N cr w 1- z w V w z En CO SOUTHRIDGE VICINITY MAP SEC. 34, TWP. 28, RGE. 23 1 S 12 x v I g Ia 2 am4 1_ L �Yy i 'ys 14 ON N-4 53 101012 1044 101111 ` • 31436 ON 0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND iu_ i- Ldi o . MN i� F N WO DO 22 2 O iZ O 2F Oa W r O CC NIsa 1-5 N N WL•J0 0 W CO ■■ W 0 Z�- ■a W>= O U 0mN ,0 _N • 0 _Jl 4.,—..., (ILIs• I 11CJ1 2 Li L_ L L. _I LI OP 0 0 0 N 1• W it 0) m 4) 3 4 m aF O a 0 J ZP'S£Z 00'991 0 J 3„£I,LI.OS - 9L'£8�— S 89.50'27"W 09'815 W a, 27 to 9 N � Z, v o 1919£ M,EI,LI.0N 0 f4 '33S 40 P1144 3441 40 Y/1444 3441 40 li 04P 1434 3441 d0 3411 1543 — i 0 0 M„£I ,LI.0 N 81'£82 m „j 41004 3d 1 0 Z >11019 51449130 NI 1 40 14 06'91111N3 34 310 d0 3411/143 341 30 101443123 A143441401 N89 42'47"E DRAINAGE !i UTILITY EASEMENT 0) 0) 0) m • `3; 101 40 1 06'911 1534 3441 30 3413 1SY3 09'3£2 2 Ci I 1- u_ LL_ _J 9 V �J V0--q}a00¢-N 0-O 9 9 0 Q 09'815 6 3.£I,LI .O S O 0 553374 0314401530 12 '0N ' H.V.SD � n ,, -- 09.81S M„£I,LI.ON 0 (�>"J 1 I • t_I`•• N-1 r SURVEYING SUNDE LAND 2 Of 2 Sheets