The URL can be used to link to this page

1983-12-06r� :� � d CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA December 6, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. l. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Approval of M inutes, November 15, 1983. 4. Consent Calendar: a. Adoption of Resolution Accepting Work and Approving Final Pa ment for Improvement No. 81, Project No. 2. (See Engineer's Memo . ' b. Adop;tion of Resolution Accepting Work and Approving Final Pa ment for Improvement No. 81, Project No. 3. (See Engineer's Memo .� c. Adoption of Resolution Setting Public Hearings and Ratifying Public Notice on Proposals to Amend Multifamily Housing Development to establish a public hearing on December 20th. d. Acknowledgement of Code Enforcement monthly report for Novem er. e. Approval of the List of Contractor licenses. f. Approval of the List of Claims. End of Consent Calendar. 5. Old Business a. United Properties request for final approval for Commercial �evelopment Revenue Bond Financing. (See attached letter. Resolution a ailable Tuesday evening). ' 6. Communications a. ArII�I Bulletin regarding Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Ordinance A:proval Requirement Conflict. b. Letter from Phillip Krass regarding accident on Lake Drive. ' 7. Commission Reports a. Planning Commission M inutes, November 22, 1'983. c. Case No. 83-35, Dornburg -- Application for Variance. (Reco end approval). 8. New Business Public � December 6, 1983 Page 'Iwo City Administrator a. Memo responding to R.M. Parranto Letter.�.7�'r as Hf��' City Administrator-Designee Councilmembers City Attorney . City Engineer a. Memo on Roadway Width Variance. Public Works Director a. Memo on Dakota County State Bank Sign Permit Approval. City Clerk a. Memo on Hughes Lot Division. JT b. Proposed resolution to correct minutes of October 18th meet(ing. 9. Adjourn. //� l��i� — �'✓�,/ � %i`� ��—,�'c�.�.��° i�� i��-r-�� y � � , G� 0 � 2 � C/�"� • .� � � 6-�ti / �'/ � �i�� i � � I" Y/ GZ.�K (/�"' �.,,� � 0�� /�� C/� / `-' i ��J Q- r / �"�Z4�� r � yl/ --�� / `/�� G�/,� ._. !- - - � ,�-m G � �O�`-�-�� C�� /� �� G�%�C G�o�� C_ Page No. 1921 November 15, 1983 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, November 15, 1983 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at the City Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Cty Council, L1, 750 South Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The �ollowing members were present: Mayor Lockwood, Councilmembers Hartmann, Mertensotto, nd Witt. Councilma.n Losleben had notified the Council that he would be late. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ayes : 4 Nays : 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Ayes : 4 Nays : 0 HEARING, DODD CONSTRUCTION C0. EASII"IENT VACATION Councilman Hartmann moved approval of the minutes f the November lst meeting with correction. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Councilwoman Witt moved approval.of the consent ca endar as sub- mitted and recommended for approval as part of the regular agenda, along with authorization for execution of all nece sary documents contained therein. l. Acknowledgement of the Fire Department monthly October. 2. Acknowledgement of a report from Administrator relative to the ICMA annual conference. report for Designee Frazell 3. Acknowledgement of the Treasurer's monthly rep�rt and Engineering Status Report for October. 4. Approval of the List of Claims dated November $177,398.92. S. Approval of the List of Licenses, granting 1 C.O. Field Company Centraire, Inc. Centraire, Inc. H.J. Pool Properties J.P. Homes, Inc. Sorenson Construction II Taping, Inc. Walter's Construction Co., Inc. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. , and totalling to . General Contractor Gas Pip'ng License Heating & A/C License General Contractor General Contractor General Contractor Plaster'ng/Stucco General Contractor Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpose hearing on an application from Dodd Construction vacation of a drainage easement in the Snelling V �f a public �mpany for �w Replat. Pa�e No. 1922 November 15, 1983 � There being no one present for the discussion the hearing was continued until later in the meeting. . , ABATII�fENT County Assessor Peterson was present to request approval of an abatement for property located at 2294 Dodd Road. Mr. Peterson explained that the original two acres of land area was not reduced for valuation purposes after Mn/DOT right--of-way acquisition, and that since the City has restricted the use of the second residential structure on the property, an economic disadvantage should be C applied to the property. Councilman Losleben arrived at 7:45 o'clock P.M. After additional discussion, Councilwoman Witt moved to grant an abatement to Mrs. Brunhild Kirchert for Parcel No. 27-03600-020-26, reducin� the assessed value from 23,107 to��18,744, for taxes payable in 1983. , Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion. • Ayes : 5 Nays : 0 MENDOTA HEIGHTS The Council acknowled�ed a letter from Mr: Marc Cella, requesting BUSINESS CENTER approval of the issuance of building permits for Phases II and III of the Mendota Hei�hts Business Center, along with a memo from the Code Enforcement Officer. Mr. Cella was also present for the discussion. Councilman Losleben moved that building permits for Phases II and ��I of the Mendota Heights Business Center be approved as requested. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes : 5 Nays : 0 FIRE STATION ?�Ir. Jim Jordan and Mr. Bruce Caulfield, from Trossen-Wright Architects were present to review the project schedule, preliminary drawings and design concept for the fire station. Mr- Jordan stated that the anticipated schedule entails advertising for�b.ids on January 6t{�, acceptance of bids on January 26, award of contracts on February 8 and construction commencement on May lst. He stated that construc- tion should then be completed within nine to ten months. Mr. Caulfield reviewed the preliminary site plan and design concept. He indicated that the preliminary plan proposes to locate the structure on the site so as to allow addition to the 76 foot length of the apparatus bays in four foot increments, up to 24 �. additional feet, as an add-alternate depending upon the result of the bid process and available funding. He described the proposed interior design of the structure and stated that the exterior will be finished with burnished concrete block. After review, Mr. Jordan requested Council approval of the prelim- inary plans and authority to proceed with preparation of final documents. There was considerable Council discussion over the proposed size of the structure, particularly the size of the apparatus bays. In Page No. 1923 [Vovember 15, 1983 response to a Council question, Assistant Fire C that Chief Noack could not be prese.nt�because of .�meeting � However- ,'at a Fire Department meeting he had expressed satisfaction w.ith- the._plans-ins 4 administrat.ion_ar_ea.,.,but-was"'riot —satisfied" with" apparatus bays. Assistant Chief Lange stated ho felt that because of the potential bidding clima possible to increase the bay size within the bud '�'..��,� �� a-.con lict:ing:,� n Sunday evening f-ar- as--the�_ he `76�`foot"� ever, that it is e, it should be et. � Councilman Losleben noted that the architectural contract is tied � to the size of the originally proposed 9,000 squ re foot structure, and that any deviation of size by more than 10% ould require a proportionate adjustment in the fee. He pointed out that the size now proposed is 1,600 square feet greater than t e original, and bay extensions will increase the square footage. Ayes : 3 Nays : 2, EASEMENT UACATION Ayes : 5 Nays : 0 Councilman Mertensotto suggested that it would b the administration areas and plan for a 100 foot He stated that the intent in building the struct sufficient room for apparatus, the other rooms a felt that the apparatus room is the real priorit constructing the facility as proposed would be b cence. He suggested that the plan call for a 10 area and shelled-in administration areas with al various levels of finishing. better to reduce ppara°tus area. e was to provide extras. He and that by lding in obsoles- foot apparatus rnates for Mr. Jordan stated that the direction to his firm as to design a finished building within the $825,000 budget, and this is what the preliminary plan reflects, with the bid alternate for bay area size increases. After considerable discussion, Councilman Losleb of the preliminary plan as presented with the ad for shelling some amount of finishing in the adm shelling to be determined by the architects and Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Mertensotto Hartmann Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpose hearing on an application from Dodd Construction vacation of drainage easements within the Snellin 1 moved approval ition of options iistration areas, ire Department. of a public :ompany for the ; View Replat. Administrator Johnson explained that when the hea ing for vacation of street rights-of-way within the plat was held, the drainage easements were inadvertently omitted from the hea ing notice and process. The easement vacation is a technicality required by the County before Dodd Construction �aill be allowed t file the Kingsley Estates plat. There being no questions or comments from the aud'ence, Mayor Lockwood moved that the hearing be closed at 9:35 o'clock P.M. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Page No. 1923 November 15, 1983 response to a Council question, Assistant Fire Ch: noted that Chief Noack could not be present becau: meeting on Sunday evening. He had expressed his : the plans insofar as the administration area but � with the 76 foot apparatus bays. Assistant Chief however that it is felt that because of the potent it should be possible to increase the bay size wit �f Lan�e � of a confli cting itisfaction with �s not satisfied ,ange stated Lal bidding climat iin the budget. Councilman Losleben noted that the architectural �j'ontract is tied � to the size of the ori�inally proposed 9,000 squarle foot structure, and that any deviation of size by more than 10% w uld require a proportionate adjustment in the fee. He pointed ut that the size now proposed is 1,600 square feet greater than th original and bay extensions will increase the square footage. C.. Councilman Mertensotto suggested that it would be the administration areas and plan for a 100 foot He stated that the intent in building the structu sufficient room for apparatus, the other rooms ar felt that the apparatus room is the real priority constructing the facility as proposed would be bu He suggested that the plan call for a 100 foot ap shelled-in administration areas with alternates f finishing. etter to reduce paratus area. was to provide extras. He nd that by ding in obsoles ratus area and various levels Mr. Jordan stated that the direction to his firm as to design a finished building within the $825,000 budget, and this is what the preliminary plan reflects, with the bid alternates for bay area size increases. After considerable discussion, Councilman Loslebe moved approval of the preliminary plan as presented with the additi of options for shelling some amount of finishing in the administ aion areas, shell- ing to be determined by the architects and Fire De� artment. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. I • Ayes : 3 Nays: 2,Mertensotto Hartmann EASEMENT UACATION Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on an application from Dodd Construction ompany for the vacation of drainage easements within the Snellin View Replat. Administrator Johnson explained that when the hearing for vacation � of street rights-of-way within the plat was held, the drainage easements were inadvertently omitted from the hea ing notice and process. The easement vacation is a technicality equired by the County before Dodd Construction will be allowed to file the Kingsley Estates plat. Ayes : 5 Nays : 0 There being no questions or comments from the aud: wood moved that the hearing be closed at 9:35 o`c] Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. nce, Mayor Lock- ck P.M. C . � Ayes : 5 Nays : 0 TAX INCRII�IENT DISTRICT Ayes : 5 Nays : 0 Page No. 1924 November 1S� 1983 Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Resolution No. 83-99, "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING VACATION OF DRAINAGE EASEMENT IN THE SNELL�..� VIEW REPLAT", as amended to recognize that consideration of the easement vacation had been inadvertently omitted from consideration at the August 2, 1983 public hearing on the vacation of rights-of- way. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Administrator Johnson distributed and reviewed a proposed resolution to clarify and correct certain provisions in the resolution estab- lishinQ the Tax Increment District. Councilman Hartmann moved the adoption of Resolution No. 83-100, "RESOLUTION RATIFYING FINDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ?�iADE IN RESOLUTION N0. 81-28, AND MAKING CERTAIN ADDITIONAL FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS A, B, AND C PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS." Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. PERSONNEL The Council acknowledged a report from Administrator Designee Frazell on his progress in preparation of a proposed compensation plan for non-union personnel. Mr. Frazell recommended that the Council conduct a workshop on November 29th to consider the propo� and to review the preliminary Capital Improvements Program. The Council concurred in the recommendation. AMBULANCE SERVICE Administrator Johnson reported briefly on his research on emergency medical service. It was the concensus of the Council that Councilman Hartmann be authorized to continue researching the matter by contact- ing Divine Redeemer Hospital Administrator Curt Wassberg, for answers to questions such as: what would happen if the City chose not to continue its Divine Redeemer ambulance subsidy? PARK AND RECREA- Mayor Lockwood stated that he has received the name of a candidate TION COMMISSION for appointment to the Park and Recreation Commission to fill the unexpired term vacated by Tom Bayless. He recommended that Mr. A1 Singer, 656 Highway 110, a naturalist at the Dodge Nature Center, be appointed to the Commission. Councilman Losleben moved that Alan Singer be appointed to the Park Commission for a term to expire on January 31, 1985. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes : 5 Nays : 0 MISCELLANEOUS Councilwoman Witt informed the Council that she has received • complaints regarding a home occupation being conducted at 680 South Freeway Road. The Council acknowledged the complaint directed that the Police Chief research the matter and refer the Ci:ty Attorney, if necessary. several and it to � Page No. 1925 November 15, 1983 KRAJNIAK City Attorney Glinthrop informed the Council that M EASEMENT agreed to prant the City the drainage easement whi as part of the wetlands approval several years ago not willing to reimburse the City costs incurred d of easement acquisition. Attorney Winthrop recomm of the easement and waiver of the required repayme Ayes : 5 Nays : 0 �� . Krajniak has h was requir�d however he is ring the process nded acceptance t. Mayor Lockwood moved to accept the Krajniak easeme t, on the basis of no cost if the easement is received within ten avs. Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion. MENDOTA HEIGHTS Public Works Director Danielson reviewed plans and specifications ROAD WIDENING for the widenin� of Mendota Heights Road east of T 149. He stated that both the widening and sidewalk constru tion will be accomplished by Mn/DOT in 1984 in conjunction with construction of the I-494 bridge. Councilman Losleben moved to authorize Mayor Lockw� plans for Mendota Heights Road widening east of TH Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion. Ayes : 5 Nays : 0 I-35E PLANS Public Works Director Danielson stated that at the meeting, the Council considered a request from Mn/ of plans for I-35E. At that meeting the Council e that there has been no commitment to a direct conn Council was also extremely concerned about the saf travelling northbound on I-35E because the tee for was adjacent to and parallel with the proposed hig elevations of the tee and the highway are equal an such that balls could easily be driven int, o oncomi Danielson informed that Council'that he;Mayor Lock �man Mertensotto had recently met with Mn/DOT offic �these-concerns:�-He-pointed"out"`that there'�will b-e cussions with Mn/DOT officials on this concern and safety wall will be designed to alleviate this pro to execute the 149. October 18th )OT for approval ;pressed concern �ction. The �ty of motorists the fourth green iway. Relative l the distance ig vehicles-..._,_M-r. vood and Council- ials to discuss some form of a Councilman Mertensotto stated that Mn/DOT has give its assurance on a direct connection.and that_a 4.5_mile per hour speed limit is the principal feature of the parkway. � Councilman Losleben expressed concern over truck t affic and suggest- ed that Mn/DOT be requested to do everything in it power to dis- courage truck traffic on TH 110 after freeway cons ruction. Councilman Hartmann moved the adoption of Resoluti n No. 83-101, "RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR I-35E". Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Ayes : 4 Nays : 1, Losl� eben ` ORDINANCES On the recommendation of the City Clerk, Mayor Loc wood moved the adoption of Ordinance No. 203, "AN ORDINANCE AM END NG ORDINANCr N0. 1109," relative to vehicular parking during snowfa ls. . � � s. Page No. 1925 November 15, 1983 KRAJNIAK City Attorney L�Iinthrop informed the Council that M EASEMENT agreed to grant the City the drainage easement whi as part of the wetlands approval several years ago not willing to reimburse the City costs incurred d of easement acquisition. Attorney Winthrop recomm o.f the easement and waiver of the required repayme Ayes : 5 Nays : 0 . Krajniak has h was requir�d however he is ring the process nded acceptance t. Mayor Lockwood moved to accept the Krajniak easeme t, on the basis of no cost if the easement is received within ten ays. Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion. MENDOTA HEIGHTS Public Works Director Danielson reviewed plans and specifications ROAD WIDENING for the widening of Mendota Heights Road east of T 149. He stated that both the widening and sidewalk constru tion will be accomplished by Mn/DOT in 1984 in conjunction with construction of the I-494 bridge. • Councilman Losleben moved to authorize Mayor Lo plans for Mendota Heights Road widening east of Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion. Ayes : 5 Nays : 0 I-35E PLANS Public Works Director Danielson stated that at the meeting, the Council considered a request from Mn/ of plans for I-35E. At that meeting the Council e that there has been no commitment to a direct conn Council was also extremely concerned about the saf travelling northbound on I-35E because the tee for was adjacent to and parallel with the proposed hig elevations of the tee and the highway are equal an such that balls could easily be driven into oncomi Danielson informed that Council that he and Counci had recently met with Mn/DOT officials to discuss � He pointed out that there will be on-going discuss officials on this concern and some form of a safet designed to alleviate this problem. Ayes : 5 Nays : 0 od to execute the 149. October 18th OT for approval pressed concern ction. The ty of motorists the fourth green way. Relative the distance g vehicles. Mr. man Mertensotto hese concerns. ons with Mn/DOT wall will be Councilman Mertensotto stated that Mn/DOT has give its assurance on a direct connection and that a 45 mile per hour speed limit is the parkway emphasis (in St.Paul). Councilman Losleben expressed concern over truck t affic and suggest- ed that Mn/DOT be requested to do everything in i s power to dis- courage truck traffic on TH 110 after freeway con truction. Councilman Hartmann moved the adoption of Resolut'on No. 83-101, "RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIAL PROVISION FOR I-35E". Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. ORDINANCES On the recommendation of the City Clerk, Mayor Lo adoption of Ordinance No. 203, "AN ORDINANCE AM EN 1109," relative to vehicular parking during snowf od moved the ORDINANCE N0. ls. �_ Page No. 1926 November 15, 1983 Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes : 5 Nays : 0 ' Mayor Lockwood moved the adoption of Ordinance No. 204, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 901", to prohibit depositing of removed snow onto public streets. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes : 5 Nays : 0 � SEWER USE CHARGE Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Resolution No. 83-102, "RESOLUTION SETTING SEWER RENTAL CHARGES FOR SINGLE FAMILY DWELL- INGS, MULTIPLE DWELLINGS, ANIENITY STRUCTURES, SCHOOLS, CHURCHES, PUBLI BUILDINGS, CONLMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES", to increase the minimum quarterly rates and the volume rates for 1984. _ Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes : 5 Nays : 0 DELINQUENT USER Mayor Lockwood moved the adoption of Resolution No. 83-103, CHARGES "RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT SANITARY SEWER RENTAL CHARGES TO THE DAKOTA COUNTY AUDITOR FOR COLLECTION WITH REAL ESTATE TAXES". Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes : S Nays : 0 ADJOURN There being no .f.urther business to come before the Council, Counc man Hartmann moved that the meeting be adjourned to 7:30 P.M. on November 29th. Nlayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Ayes : 5 Nays : 0 TLME OF ADJOURNMENT : 11 :25 0' clock P.M . ATTEST : Robert G. Lockwood Mayor \, Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk m CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO December 1, 1983 T0: City Council FROM: Edward F. Kishel City Engineer SUBJECT: Final Payment Certificates i Included with the Claims for Payment are final payment certificat s for Improvement No. 81, Project No. 2, and Improvement No. 81, Project No. 3, installation of watermain across FAI 35E at Mendota Heights Road and W gon Wheel Trail. In that they are final payments, they must be approved b Council resolution. Attached are such resolutions. Staff recommends payment and the adoption of said resolutions. a City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. 83- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT II�ROVEMENT N0. 81, PROJECT N0. 2 WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Mendota Heights on June 10, 1983, F.F. Jedlicki, Incorporated of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, has satisfactorily completed the watermain extension across Wagon Wheel Trail improvement project (Improvement No. 81, Project No. 2) in accordance with such contract. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby dir- ected to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract in the amount of $3,444.89, taking the contractor's receipt in full. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 6th day of Aecember, 1983. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk � l� w City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. 83- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT INIPROVEMENT N0. 81, PROJECT N0. 3 WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of M� Heights on June 10, 1983, F.F. Jedlicki, Incorporated of Eden Pr� Minnesota, has satisfactorily completed the watermain extension Mendota Heights Road improvement project (Improvement No. 81, P� No. 3) in accordance with such contract. do ta rie, ross ject NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the C'ty of Mendota Heights that the work completed under said contract is ereby accepted and approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby dir- ected to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contr ct in the amount of $4,739.80, taking the contractor's receipt in full. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this � day of December, 1983. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Bv Robert G. Lockwood Mayor th CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION N0. 83- RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RATIFYING PUBLISHED NOTICE THEREOF ON PROPOSALS THAT THE CITY AM END ITS "PROGRAN FOR MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT UNDER CHAPTER 462C - LEXINGTON HEIGHTS APARTMENT PROJECT" AND THAT THE CITY ISSUE ITS MULTIFAMILY HOUSING MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE A PROJECT UNDER SAID PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, M inneso a, has determined that it is in the best interests of the City to amend its " rogram for Multifamily Housing Development Under Chapter 462C - Lexington Hei hts Apartment Project (the "Program") to substitute Lexington Heights Asso iates Limited Partnership (the "Developer"), a Minnesota limited partnership, as the developer thereunder and with�respect to certain other matters; an WHEREAS, the amended Program provides that the City will issue it Multi- family Housing Mortgage Revenue Bonds in an estimated amount of $11,00 ,000, to finance the acquisition, construction and installation of an approxima �e�ly 225 unit multi-family rental project to be located at 2300 Lexington Avenue in t;he City; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has caused Notices of Public Hearing substantially in the forms attached hereto as Exhibit A and Exhibit B to be published i the City's official newspaper, in accordance with law. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of M�endota Heights, as follows: � l. The Council shall meet on Tuesday, December 20, 1983, to condu t a public hearing on a proposal that the City amend.its "Program for Multi amily Housing Development under Chapter 462C - Lexington Heights Apartment Project". 2. The Council shall meet on Tuesday, December 20, 1983, to condu hearing on a proposal to issue its housing mortgage revenue bonds pursu M innesota Statutes., Chapter 462C, to finance the acquisition., construct installation of the proposed Lexington Heights Apartments to be located Lexington Avenue in the City. 3. The Council hereby ratifies publication of notice of such previously published in the West St. Paul kiendofa HeigHts Sun. t a public nt to on and at 2300 ic hearings Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, M innesota, �his Sixth day of December, 1983. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By ' Robert G. Lockwood, ATTEST : Kathleen M. Swanson, City Cler �or hlr r10 'i�.:.�: Citv Council _ ::��?-1: Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer �:l?JECT: Building Activity Report for November 1983 CiJRRENT MONTH � YEAR TO DATE - 1983 NO. VALUATIOh FEE COLLECTED NO. VALUATION • ..:�� r� �'•SITS ��'� 7 $774,682.78 $5,313.84 61 $6,792,185.06 '�/I 9 89,910.00 1,125.98 38 4,806,228.08 ��=��• 3 27 100.00 378.69 119 807 512.37 su`� Total 19 $891,692.78 $6,518.51 218 $17_,405,925.51 . . _. . c..i•'. I ; S �==��: 6 153.00 82 � �- 6 30.00 75 =•- 12 210.00 70 �� ..�y, � b Ga� Pioe 18 1,018.00 86 � �;:i; ^otal 42 $1,411.00 313 _._..�.�JT:vv Cont�actor's �ic�:lses 14 350.00 287 DATE: November 25, 1983 FEE COLLECTED $47,Q56.92 23,449.93 10,572.62 $81,079.47 1,873.00 650.00 1,300.00 3,538.00 $7,361.00 7,175.00 YEAR TO DATE - 1902 �0. VALUATION 66 $6,631,913.33 23 3,775,371.04 150 862,325.66 ?.39 $11,269,610.03 SO 54 47 76 227 237 FEE COLLE::! = $39,038.40 18,291.98 9,411.4a $66,791.52 1,667.00 420.00 897.50 6,4�1.0� S9,385.50 $5,925.00 TOT:+L 75 $891,692.78 $8,579.51 I818 $12,405,925.51 $95,615.47 I703 $11�269,610.03 $82,102.32 '- ::11 ree amounts exclude Sac, Wac and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, F�lan checti �ee vr;u �.�aluation amounts. � LIST OF CONTRACTOR'S TO BH APPROVED BY COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 Blaine Heating, Air Conditioning Blaine Heating, Air Conditioning Complete Air Heating and Cooling, Complete Air Heating and Cooling, Dave's Builders David and David Sewer and Water, Doody, Inc: Doody, Inc. Kimmes Masonry, I�c. Steve Kroiss and Sons, Inc. Kuehn Excavating Signature Enterprises & Elect., Inc. & Elect., Inc. Inc. Inc. Inc. Gas Pip: Heating Gas Pip: Heating General Excavat� Gas Pip: Heat ing Masonry General Excavatj General ng License and AC License ng License and AC License Contractor's Lice ng License ng License and AC License License Contractor's Lice ng License Contractor's Lice � 1 4 ! fy A < � ♦ � M Dept 0-Rd&Bridges t Dept 10-Admin __,. .__ ___ ..-•-- •-----...n_.._ . ��... _.... _..__ - �. ._.. .... .. ... ..�_.._... .._....�. -•..... -15-Engr _. � ______._- -•-- O�arks 0-Utilities 12/06/83 CLAIMS LIST � 20-Police 0-Planning , � CHECK REGFSTER 30-Fire 0-Animal Control 40-DodF• Enfc �„A.MOUNT __V'c=NDGR_. _ , :. ,___ ITEM__ DESCRIPT ON , _._. _AC_COUNT_N0._.IN - -�-� _.....�.�.:-^... __ . ._..._ - — -- - - _ .. - -....� _ .._ _ .�-•--�--_ - . . __. _...__._ .__-•-- - - � --•. . _ . .. ----- --- �� 207.50 � AMER BUSINESS RISK �� 10MOS84 EXC�SS 176.70 AMER BUSINESS RISK 10MOS8480ILER&MCHY _..__.35..30 ... ,__._,.AMER BUSINESS. RISK_._.,___ `_zMOS _83BCILER&MCNY..__ 4i .50 AMER BUSINESS RISK 2MOS83EXCESS 461 .00 * ✓ 63.00 BI�D�R SHEET METAL W RFO HTGPER�1558 1.50 . BI NOER SHEE7 METAL R�D S/CH#1558 64.50 * 11b.12 CONTRACTOR MCHY&SPLY CHAIN/HOCKS 116.12 *� 141.38 PAUL OREELAN REIMB EXP CAHERA i 41 . :i 8 _*. . __ _ . 155.00 FOREMAN&CLARK PANTS/BLAZER/1LANGE 155.00 *r 1 i0.70 1 lO.OD *• 3�444.89 4�937.A0_ ^_..._ 8,3$2.69 *. 955.01 955.01 *� ..1_�064.64— 21 ,292.R2 20r228.18 *✓ 15.75 • 15.75 +► _ 20 .2 5 40.50 JOHN GRUND F F JEOLICKI F_F JEDLICKI,__ MORTDN SALT _ME,M SEyER�4)ATER _ M.&M SEWER841ATER �T PAUL BOOK�STA7 �IKING ELEC SPLY LIKING ELEC SPLY STUMP REMOVAL FINAL 81-2 FINAL 81-3 SAF£-T SALT RETAINER 83-5 PYMT 1 83-5 MISC SPLYS CL LE NS CL LENS 01-1215-000-00 01-1215—Ofl0-00 01-4250-110-70 v 01-4250-9'10-10 �01-3253-�00-00 01-3315-000—UO Oi-4305—OSO-50 U1-4403-030-30 .. . -� -- - _._. _.. .------ � -� �- � 01-4410-020-20 � _' '� . _♦ Q1-450fl-220-70 70-446Q-944-00 7i-4460-945-D'0 01-4421-050-50 88-2020- ODD-0'0 �� 88-4460-813-00 � � 01-43D0-030-30 01-4305-070-70 01-4305-070-70 _ .. _ ._.. __ _ . ._ ._. �. � A MOU �T 60.7� *. 4?0.00 E� .1 5 z��.�� tJ M�� SR.70 s�?4.R0 *.� ! sfl0�.h0 3,109.35 7 37 . 9 {# 4�$54.85 +� � 35.00 35.0� �/ CHECK REGIST�R V� NDGR POtCNER PRTG pOI.CF#ER pRTG POUCHER PRTG PCI.CN�R PRTG POUCN�R PRTG ��1AUGEtNESSY CJ 5HAUGHNESSY GO SNAU�?�NESSY C�J AIR Ct3MN! ?NC ITEM DESCRIPTI4N BflNfl PRTC BONQ PRTG BONB PRTG BONO PRTC 80Nfl f'RTG FEE Z MPR 80NDS FEE IMPR BQNDS F�£ IMPR BONDS DEG CQNTR 0 97.50 45,29 97.SQ 2 40 . 7 9 +�� 1 04.76 � �ti s7� k 16,44 19«:'9 35.53 * . 4. h9 4,7Q 4. 69 13.11 �7.1 3 30.09 78t1.88 357.28 1 ,742.57 *�, 4.�0 4 . +4 {} +r ALDY 6RAPHIC SPLY �LDY Gf�APl�IC SPl.Y AI.DY GRAPNIC SPLV ALEINSON fi&J qUT� SPLY B&.} AUi C SP LY BO wAT�R COMMISSIDN BD �A TER CO"1MISSI (?N BO 4iA7tR CaMMISSIO�f ED WAT�R COMMI�SION BD 41A T�'R CQMM 3S SI 0�1 BD WA7ER i�OMMFSSION BD 1�A fiER COMM IS SI Oi� 8D 414TER COMMISSION �R�uU PHoro DISKETTES MI SC S �l YS DZSKETTES MISC FAI�i �IIPER BLAOES FIiTINGli�C$E OCT SVC 2431LEX QCT S VC 243'1 LEX OCT SilC�43iLEX COMM �ATER READINGSS {}CT E NGR SYC OCT ENGR TIME RAISENYQRANTS OCT ENGR TIMc FINISNTNG 52.3Q CZ7Y M4TOR SUPP�Y SFAl./PAQS/StiOES ACCOUNT N0. Itv' 16-422b-00{1-40 62-4226-936-QQ 74-422b-Oi3Q-L}0 85-422b-�1 t3-qG 88-422b-$1 3-QO b2-422b-F3b={i0 74-4226-000-00 88-4226-81 3-DO �1-�330-450-20 01-43G�0-'! 10-10 OS-430D-105-15 05-�3�0-#OS-15 D5-4305-10` i �71-4330-440-2Q 15-4330-49Q-�0 0.�-4425-310-SO 01-4425-310- 7G 15-4�25-310-b0 15-4490-Obp-60 7i-4231-945=(}Q 83-4231-807-OQ 83-446Q-$07-4Q 85-42 31-�10-00 01-4305-020-20 Q1-433I1-44 Q-20 Ci1ECK REGISTER ANO�JNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPT�ON 31.Q7 CITY MOTOP. SUPPLY PLUGS/NIRES 32.11 CITY MOTCN SUPP�Y MISC SPLYS 116.38 *,/ 5,64 CCAST TO COAST CLA NPS 56.95 COAST Ta COAST PO�ER BLCUER 3.04 COAST TO COAST KEYS AOMOFC 65.h 3 * , 5.70___. CflPY E�UIP CO VtLLUM . 77.85 COPIf EQUIP CO MISC SPLYS �3.5 S *i i�098.50 DAFLGr�EN HO�IAR►� ASSQ OCT RE AIRPORTNaIS� 1�183.00 DAt�LGP,EN HOWARO ASSO OCT RETA INER 3t]f�.�0 DAHLGREN HOIiARO ASSO OCT M4ClAND 2,5R7.50 *� 4R.R4 CANIELSON JAMES E MI THRU11/29 48 .5 4 +►. 1,762.50 DCR CORP. DtC R�NT 1�170.'�0 OCR CORP. OEC RENT 2,932.50 # 90.00 DENNIS DELMONT DEC MI 9D.00 */ 175.00 FRAZELL KEVIN DEC MI 40.Q0 FRAZ�LL K�VIN REIMB EX�F 215.00 �►/ - 159.35 SOA CORPORATION ANTI FREEZE 54.00- GOA CORPGRATI CN RE7D DRUMS 18.00- GOA CORPOP.ATION RETD DRUNS I, �•P7.35 s,' ' 53.P,5 IDS LIFE INS CO 71111 41/Ft r aCCOU*JT N0. IN11 01-4330-440-20 01-4330-490-SD 01-43D5-050-50 41-4305-070-70 01-4490-110-10 ii _ QS-430if-105-15 I 05-4300-105-15 �1-4220-135-80 01-4221-135-8G 16-4220-135—OD 05-4415-105-15 a 01-4200— 600-10 OS-420D-600-15. Q1-4475-021-20 Q1-448D-110—]0 01-4490—ii0-10 � 01-1 210-000-00 � 01—i210-000-00 � 01-1210—D00-00 01-2072-000-00 a , CHECK RE6ISTFR _ AMOUNT _. ._._.._ __.._ ._ _._ _._vE.NDCR .._T __�,._.�_ __._ ITEM_.DESCRIPTION.--_--_.__..ACCOUNT._�NO. IN' �. �4.D3 IDS LIFE INS CO CITY CONTR 1 �/11PR �1-4480-11" 0 - --. .._._ _ 1 27sB8_ +�,�_--..�._.��._.__..__-----.....�..._ _ _.�_.___...._..�..�.__W_.�._.._.-w---__...�._.�__..._--__ -------- - - ; ________ _ -- ".1 � 14 �.�__. __ _ _ KNtJTH" TOM � � a9.54 � • � KNt1TH �.TOM ..________..___ 9_Q_�b4 * ---------�.__..�......__._._.. ,__..__. ...._..__...-Mi THRU 1 i%30 -_�_.._._—____-{i5-� 4�15• 1�OS• ) 5 MI THRU 1'11.3fl - 8$-�,4'IS-$,'1.3-OU - -- - -----__.____._._.. - -_--�.__...._.�__.... _._____.___._�._ ._.�-• ---...-_--.-----�.___._�. ' ' 4►.b2 �� KULLANpER 6UY MI THRU 11 /30 ' OS-44)5�-10 S-i 5 ° 29.92 . KULC'AMDER GUIf HI THRU1 i/�3U r� 88-4k15-$'1 3-00 _.___._.__.�. �+_!..$�! .-r___�C,�l,.lt.��.B_. ��X _.�.__ ,.._� _Ty,Rl1 911l3a_____�. 84-�►415-8� 4-00 39 .3 8 *,, � 135.00 LELS • DEC DUES 4i-2075-QDO-UQ 1 35 .0 0 * --.___.__...._�_._.. _,--__,__..�.��..------ r--� ---�_.----____._�________..___.�__.�__._.r____..__..__-----.----.- ---- — - ---._._. .. _ _..�_.._..__..___..---. _____.__..�________....--- -- -- -- -- �� 69.08 LMCIT NP PLAN DEC INS ii%H° Di-2074=0D0-00 250.00 LMCIT HP- PLAN bECPREM ` 01-4245•020-20 ----_..._ 56.69.._- -. ----.�_ LTNCIT. H� _�LAN,_�__.....�_..._..__..___ DEC PREM ___:__..__ �___ 07-4�245-Q.2'� '0 120.OQ LMCIT HP �LAN QEC PREM 01-4245-04 D 495.77 * / _._97g.52_.��------�OGI� _i.r.___.__..__�.__._.._--- OCT svc_--_.__._. 97s.sz *. 2i1�901.27 METRO WASTE CONTROL DEC INSTALL ._ .2i1 � 9 01. 2l *. _--•- - _ _.+__.._..��..__... _.�w _ _ ._.._ ._. .. _ . .�---•-----..�_.. . _ _. _ ... _...__._ __._...__._._____�.._._______.._..___.._----__......__�__.__._�. ___----..._.._.,__ 239.00 MIDY�S,T � �iIRE•STEE� T POSTS - 119,SD �- HID�iEST WIRE-STEEI , T POSTS 3 58 .5 U * � �� , . >. r.� . . ... . . _. � � ~ � � � � � f � � � O 15-4449-06,0-60, --------,�� ._. 0'l-4420-05D-50 . 01-4420-05D-50 .._ �.�---�--66.30° ----�-�MILLER-DAVIS CO-._^.._... ---�-MINUTE BOaKS— --�-----��-01-4�300-1i0-10, � 66.3fl */ , , . , ,. . �. > , .. 27.95 MINN BENEFIT ASSN DEC W/N 01-2074-001. ,0 --. .. .. _ _._._�_ _-- --.__.�---- �� ---- - 5.00� •�^�� MINN BENEFIT ASSN DECPREM � 01-4245-050-50� ,.32.9S */ . . • . � ' . .., > . ,.a:: y�,� wrw.,.�> . ._.�...,._._ __..__�.�________....,.,---.._ _. __........ . ._ . _�____ _._- --, ___.._._.._ . __�.___..__�_._ .._. �...�..._.___.____ _�_ __r = � AMOUNT.. ._________ ..__. _ CHECK REGISTER � U=ND�R _ _ ._ .._. .. ITEM_ OESCRIPTION__ i7.55 MINN MUTUAL I.IFE DECW/H 3.90- NINN MUTUAL LIFE � DEC PREM -�- ---. . _��----------_ -_ __-----------------... ----�- ----____------ --------- - - --- 1�.95 NINN MIfTUAI LIFE DEC PREM � 3.90 MINN MUTUAI�LIFE DECPREM _. . - ---.1.95��' .�,_.. .__._.MINN MUTU_AL_ L.IFE_____.____.__ _. DEC._,PREH.....___._ 5.85 M2NfV MUTUAL LIFE - DEC PREM 35.1 0 *l W __ACCOUNT _N0._ IN� 01-207b-ODO-00 __-_---__ 01-4245-020-20 ��Q�-4245-021-20 01-4245-D50-50 01-�►2 45-070• 70 �.�,.�..�.Y 01-42 45-1 'I 0-10'- . _.__..__2�•�9 ��_..�#�RT►�I�RN_ST. POKER CO ...._.___NOV,._S_VC --....________...__.�_�- __fl1-4211-30_0-50-- 57.34 NORTH�RN ST POi��R CO NOY SVC 01-4211-315-30 299.91 NORTHERN ST POWER CO , NOV SVC 01-4212-3)5-30 6 42 . 3 4 _ */ _ — _ _ _ ._ - � - --- � - - � -- -- - -- - ----- �-----_..- --• �---- --- -------� ------.---__-----�----- ----�-------- ---� - - -- -�-----_..... _ __..__.__--�-------_._ __ __—___.._..__..�___ -----•----�-_.._._._._._..._.....,_. 216.54 NORTHUESTcitN BFLL NOV SVC 01-4290-020-20 65.52 NORTHwESTERN BELL NOVSVC Oi-4210-050-50 97:b6 NORTH�IESTERN BELL NOV SVC 01-4210-070-70 - 260.1 5-�.---- --�� NORT!li�ESTERN BELL �..y �_ � � NOV� SVC - - � �- - -�---� � ....-01-4210-'110-1'0 69.63 (�QRTHWESTERN BEIL NOV SVC 0'1-42i0-315-30 ..___..71..50___..-----_.__ NO�tTH,WESTERN SELL ._.-------- NOVSVC.._..___. ._..�.---_--.------ -- -.__05-4210-105-15_ 524.07 NORTHWESTcRIV BELL NOV SVC i5-42�0-Qb0-60 1 �305.07 *,/ . .___.---- — - ------ - - - �_ 1.75.00______ _. flAK__CREST .KENiVEIS__ _ _ __ NOV_RETAINER!!CALLS_____ 01-4221-800-94_ 75.00 OAK CREST KENN�LS NOV BOARD �1-4225-800•90 250.00 •,� - 31_�949.,3_7_^/____ _OR_FEI.. b.._S.ONS .INC_.,,_ �. .._, • _FINAL,._83-2 .____ _..._____.___,_ __._,.85-44b0-8'10-00 , 31 � 9 49 . 31 */ � . 176.00 OSWALD FIRE HOSE � END C4PS 01-4330-460-30 . ___.1.76.D� *.�._...�..._ .. ; 11.25 OXYGEN SERVICE CO ' OEHURRAGE THRU 10115 01-4305-03D-30 11.25 OXY6EN SERViCE CO � DEMURRAGE THP.0 10/15 01-4305-050-50 -•-----44.3.8�_ _ ._. CXYGEN SERVICE CO- -- - - -- �--OXY/ACET " -. .---� --. _._ ._..._01-4305-050-5D bb.88 *.% ' 27.90 pAYI.ESS CASHUAYS INC SCOOP SHCVELS 3.99 PAYLESS CASHNAYS INC MOLDING 31 . 8 9 « / , ., ,.� . fl1-4305-070-70 01-4305-070-7t? CHECK REGISTER �MOUNT VENDOa ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV�. 347.55 �INE BENO PAVING INC WEAR MIX 01-4422-050-5U S: - 391.�5_-_-;-- - PINE.. 8EN0_PAUI.NG I_�C __._ MC MIx ---,--_ _- -- - _--.-_,- ' _. ._01-4422-050-.50,�5� 7 39 .4 0 *�,/ . . . 325.OU P041ER BRA KE EQUIP CO INSTAIL AIR DRYER , 07-4330-4bU-30 0 3 25 . 0 0 * � ---- -- - --___ __._. __ _ .._--- - ----- �_._.._- ----------�...-- --�_ ...�_ ..__ .... __ -----_--.-____._..._......_ ._ _ ___._____r..�_—_----------.----- 2,69 SbT OFFICE PR00 MARKERS 01-4300-110-10 T 4.6fl S&T OFFICE PROD , APPT BOOK 01-4300-110-10 B 7.2 9 * / --- --_._ ______.. ._� _ _._ _.—__..----.___._.___ __ _—____ ..._..-------- ---�- -•-- - �---- --�-�- ---- �- --� --�----.._----�---._.____...... .__--__�.�--� ---------- - -- 35.00 SEI.ANDER DUANE C DEC MI 01-4415-200-70 35 .0 0 *� � , 40.60 SEVEN CORNER ACE HOiI� � PUSHERS � l3i-43t15-07D-�U � 40.60 *� , 19.53- SHIELY J L CO �ULY REBATE 01-4421-OSU-SQ 2 � 42.rJb----�--- SNIE�r �� _.Ca___ .. .------ CL 2KE�r-�- - ----- -- -- --- -- D1-4421-0�50-50 1 22 . S 3 �; 50.00 SIGNAL CAR WASH 4TH QTR CONTR fl1-4430-020-20 a . . - - 29.70 SIGNAL CAR WASH NOV �IASHES 01-4430-020-20 0� 79.70 */ .. __. __...__.__._ _. - --- -------__ .. __._ .- --.- ----w•- .� -- ---------___. ..�_.._W-.---.---. ,----- ------___ . _. __. .. .._._______.-- - -- --- 61.00 SI�aP ON TOOLS FLEX SHTS 15-4305-Ob0-60 t 61 .00 *� _ 2 � 2 09_. 51,. -,- - 76.D7 125.10 4 68 . 5 8 __y 2 67.94:� 3b6.54 - -- 90._1.9.._---- 674.44 1 60.65 4,419.02 */ . ST.__TR��4S _SS __�OSI_. F.U�'0.� __.._._.NOV _FICA,_ 4I,/H_��__. .. ____ ._.._._.01-20.63-OOQ-00_. 8T TREAS SS CON FUND NOV FICA 01-4408-021-20 ST TREAS SS CON FU(VD NOV FICA 01-4408-040-40 ST TREAS SS CON FUND NOV FICA Oi-44Q8-050•50 �------__------ ---.�_____.__--- - -�---._.-__ _ -- --- -- -----� - ST TREAS SS CON FUND • NOV FICA 01�4�,08-070•70 ST TR�AS SS CON FUND NOV FICA 01-4408-i) 0-1�0 _.___ST__TREAS SS__,CON.._FUhO_��__„ NOV,. FICA__ FRAZE��_.._._____ _.,___01-4480-1.'1_0-10�.. ST TREAS SS CON F11N0 NOV FICA 05-4408-1U5-i5 ST TREAS SS CON FUND NOV FICA 15-4408-060- _,_ ;.. .____.....__._._,.---- -._•--_.., v. _ -_ -- -... _ ._ _W .. . _..�_ _. __ _._ �_..___. ._--- -- --. _ . _._ . _.__� ._. ._ 4 _.. ._. .__.— - _ � CHECK REGISTER A_MOUk7 __ . _ __. __ . __ _ VE NDCR __. _ ITEM, OESCRIPTION __ _ _._. _ __ ACCOUNT _N0._..INV, .. .___.._9•1$_--.--..__.._ SUN_.NEWSPAPE.RS .__.._..�_.._.�...._f�R�...N.�T.__VAC�ASE.__..___...__. l_0.1-4240-1_10-10.� 9 .1$ */ � . � . 123.00 UNITED YAY-ST PAUL DECCONTR 01-2070-000-00 .... _._. 1 23..00, */---�_ ..�. _ .. _ 120.D0 US POST OFFICE � 19B4ppSTALPERMITS 01-1215-000-00� 12Q.00 �� , SQ.4_0____ ____ _VIKIryG_INDUSTRTAI. CT_ _ FLARES__ __ 50 . 4 U � - - . .. . -- - - -- - - - 01-4305-030-30 � 64.70 W�'LLS FARGO TRUSTEE DEC Y/H 01-2071-000-00 L 39.09 WEI.�S .FAR�O TRUSTEE _____DEC PREH 01-4246-020-20 L 2D.76 WELLS FARGO TRUSTEE DEC PREH' 01-424b-OSO•50 �L 1Q.38 41ELLS FARGO TRUSTEE OEC PREM 01-4246-070-70 L 134.93 */ 1 27.1 0� �� WESTERN LI�E INS C� � DEC�PREM 01-4246-030-30 +3 � 27 .1 0 *� . , 72.b0 GOA CORPORATIQN - --�2.60 -*,%- .. ._..- - �-- --- ---_ _._ -- OIL 56.69 LMCIT HP PLAN DEC PREM S 6 . b 9 *,/ - - - � 01-1210-000-OD _4 01-4245-OSO-50 - , -___---�--.... .-�---------..�_------_--__.w_ _ __�__.. , _._.. .... .. _._....__.. ..�� .._..... . -: - _. . _... ._�____.._ _ ._.__ .. . .. ___ _ _._._.- - ------ ----- ---- - --_-- 134.26 LOGIS OCT SVC 15-4214-060-b0 1 134.26 *i � , , • • . _, .__446.80___,__ ___ F`/1Q�......��/.sT'iQ.v_c7p�S .%�.S'SNI.NSTRUCTION._SPL1fS_.._.. .. . .0'I-4403-03D-3� D 446.F0 * - - � - - � _ . ... .. _.. .. . .. - -- �-- - -• -- �� 48.84 /j iC /�s� Rd �L Qu,n e� MILEAGE THRU 11 /18 07-4415-OSO-50 ' - - _.- - -- _._..---.- --.----- - ._ _ _ _ _ .._ _... .- -. - _ . ......_ . _ �_. ____ __.__._w_.�.. ___ _ . __..._..- ---- - ---- .--- - -- ._._..-------.____-----•.�- . � CHEGK REGIST_R MOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCQUNT N0. INV� 4$.84 * . , 14�57�.D0 __..._ . ... __..__4-'_"_��ll�t,��1iN__. �'S-S'}/ �'4. F�E_. TZF 60NOS._.. .._._.._.__.___._16-4226-Qt}0-0_� . 23�4�.'!0 .. _�_-�--�EE IMPR 80NOS 85-4226-81Q-fl0 't4t804.1Q * . : ` 16,990.42 FUNCt t31 TQTAt � GE�iERA! FUNO .2;301.60 �____._ _._._- �`UNO^_05 70TAL_ ___,.- - ..___ENGR__ENTERPRISE _�__.__ � - . 21.,81•8".�i4'-�- _ FUNCi 15 TQTAL SE1�ER UTItITtt .... , . :_ . _. _.______..____ _ 15,3Q6.q0 . �FUNp 16 TOTI�L TAX:INCRENENT DISTRICT .._ _i_},t#i7_f?5�..._.__.__..__._ �ilND__52' T_OTAL___._..---._.__-_I79-'#2__I Yt�,_ �A�.�S 'lST,�ADD ____�__ _.__..._._- --.--- 3�446.89 FUNp 70 TOTAL 181-2�AG i�#i Tfi WAT ExT 4t9$4.93 FUNQ 71 TOTAI I$1-3MHRDYAT EXT '. 3,356.70 FUND 74 TOTAI I78-41b-79-4l8�81-1 . _ _ ._.__ ..__._ ____ _ _. ___ _ . . � . .. ---_._._ __ _ __...__._._ ._._ _._ .--- - - --- --_._,__ _ __ ,. -- 810.9� FUND 83 TOTAL -M�~ ._ .� -- `I.82-8HU8�R DR UPGR. 32tS59.29 FUN[3 85 TOTAL I83-2STRU8 PUD 21._t.144._2,4.- ..__�___.� _�UNp _88 _TOTAL ..._... ... ._..w_.____.I83_-SOOD,O._CI�NST ___�.,.._... __..__._____ �___._ . 4:84 FiJND 84 TOTAL Z83-bCA�.LAHANIKEUPE -__�___..__ ..123,849r7?_ _- ,- TOTAL ...MAN.UAL._CHECKS._.. _...».____._.._._.___,.__..�..._..__..._.. ._ ....__...�.---•�..__.�_.____.___...______._...____.____...._....._.._----_�____.._ --- 10390 4,472.83 Dir Int Revenue �IT WjH 11.j11 PR 10391 . _._ .___.__ ,_..20Q.00_. Dak. Cty__Bank --. ._ ..P R. Deduc'�ions. 11,�11_...__ _ _ _..._ .... - -_-_-_-_--.....-_--_ _ -- - iossa �a.ao „ ,� � 10393 822.75 State Cap Cr Un " . ' 1039.4.__ .._ _.5,168..02._.._Comm_.Revenue_ ,.___. __._SIT_.WfFi 1Qj_2$&11/_11�._,.._r..._ _.�_.��__..,. --------- 10395 2�,427.56 City NII3 PR Acct Net Payrall 11/11 14396 4,584.59 St Treas PERA 11/11 Payroll 10397. _ __._ ._ 20Q»00 _Dak_Cty_.Bank _. __..P_.R Dec3uctions_ 31/25._.._.____ . _ _.._.._.__. _ ___ . .__ ___. ._ 10398 � 847.75 State Cap Cr Un " : 10399 4,758.35 Dir Int Rev FIT WjFI 1.1J25 ..1.040Q• •---_._----21�,b12�.69—City Mh -Pr Acct .. _...... __ Net_.Payrall_11/25____.�_..._..._�..,.._�. _. .. - - --. 64,144.54__._.._._.. _ ._.._.__...__ .._...� .___-.----- ____ . .._.-_. _.._ _�. .... �T __...____.� $._ 18•7-,954.3�..... ----.._.__.___.._..____ � . .. .._---_.._ __---.... ._ _._ _._ � . __. ..� ... _ ._ . .. ___. �_ __..__._._._.---. ._.__._,._____.__.._ " i " "..-...._.. . ._. _,. ._ _ . . _.. _. .. _ ._. . _ _ .. _ . . .. ___.._... .---._ .___ __. - -- !� � X ... f . _... ._.1 . ._._._----...__._.__. ._ . . _ . .. ..__.._.,____....._.__ . _._._._ ....._ _ _.__._.._.___.---.__._..._,..___._____�_..�_.__�Y....-- 11N ITED P�OPERTI ES November 21, 1983 Ms. Kathy Swanson City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 RE: Commercial Development Revenue Bonds, Mendota Heights Business Center, Phase III Dear Kathy: - 4..;,.. � . . .: � � : �.; . :, United Properties requests to be placed on the agenda of December 6 City Council meeting for final approval for Cc Development Revenue Bond financing for Mendota Heiahts Bi Center phase III. i�r. Larry Shaughnessy, City Financial tant, has been receiving current documentation regarding and is well aware of our plans. Please call me if you need more information. Yours very truly, �`�� Marc D. Cella Project Development Manager MDC/c j t cc: Mr. Larry Shaughnessy Mr. Len Champer Ms. Trudy Halla Nis . Andrea Bond Mr. Bruce Odlaug 893-8828 WRITER'S DIRECT LINE the mmercial siness Consul- the issue f�Jarlt�IGnd Fxecutivc Office Cent�r/350U Wesf 80th Streef�Minnc�apolis. Minnesotc� 55431�"(bl2) 831-1U00 I Extract of Minutes of a Meeting of the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regu�lar -� • meeting of the City Council of the Cit�r of Mendota Height�s, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall in said City, oCated at 750 South Plaza Drive, on December 6, 1983, at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: and the following were absent: P4ember introduced the following re: tion and moved its adoption: RESOLUTIOPd AUTHORIZICQG A PROJECT UNDER THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIA'L DEVELOPMENT ACT AND THE ISSUANCE OF COMMERCIAL DEVFLOPMEC�TT REVEI�TUE BOND5 TO FIiJANCE THE PROJECT (MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSIN.ESS CENTER III PROJECT) � The motion for the adoption of the £oregoing tion was duly seconded by member , and u� being taken thereon the following voted in favor thereoj and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and �olu- solu- vote 0 RESOLUTIO� AiJTHORIZING A PROJECT UNDFR THE MI�NESOTA MU�ICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AND THE ISSUANCF OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT REVE�UE BONDS TO FINANCE THE PROJECT (MENDOTA HFIGHTS BUSINESS CENTER III PROJFCT) BE IT RFSOLVED by the Council of the City of Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Council has received a proposal from � Northland Company (the "Company"), that the City underta; partially finance a certain Project as herein described, ant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Ac Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes (the "Act"), through the ance by the City of its $800,000 Commercial Development Bonds, Series 1983 (Mendota Heights Business Center III Project) (the "Bonds"), and in accordance with a Bond Pu Agreement (the "Bond Purchase Agreement") among the City Company and Juran & Moody, Inc. (the "Bond Purchaser"). Bond Purchaser will offer the Bonds pursuant to a P'relim Official Statement dated December 5, 1983 (the "Prelimin Official Statement") and a Final Official 5tatement to b prepared prior to the closing of the purchase of the Bon "Final Official Statement"). 2. The Company desires, alone or in conjuncti� others, to acquire certain real estate and construct the: three office/warehouse buildings and related improvement equipment suitable for use as commercial business office (hereinafter, the "Overall Project"). The Overall Proje being constructed in three phases. The financing for th of t'ne three buildings was authorized pursuant to a Bond Resolution of the City dated May 3, 1983; the second bui and phase is intended to be financec� through sources oth Commercial Development Revenue F3onds. The Overall Proje described above will provide employment to approximately additional persons and will otherwise further the polici purooses of the Act, and the findings made in the prelim resolutions adopted by this Council on March 1, 1983, an 5, 1983, with respect to the Project are hereby ratified affirmed and approved. The project to be financed from proceeds of the Bonds is the third of the buildings conp the Overall Project; it is free-standing and will contai apnroximately 20,000 sq. ft. (hereinfter, the "Project") 3. It is proposed that, pursuant to a Loan A date3 as of December 1, 1983, between the City, as lend the Company, as borrower (the "Loan Agreement"), the Ci 2 ndota •- • e e to pursu- . issu- evenue chase the The na ry ry s ( the n with eon and t is first r than t as 225 s and nary April ising eement , and loan the proceeds of the Bonds to the Company to partially the costs of the Project. The basic payments to be ma� Company under the Loan Agreement are fixed so as to pr revenue sufficient to pay the principal of, premium, i and interest on the Bonds when due. It is further pro that the City assign its rights to the basic payments certain other rights under the Loan Agreement to the F Trust Company of Saint Paul, in St. Paul, Minnesota (t� "Trustee"), as security for payment of the Bonds under Indenture of Trust dated as of December 1, 1983 (the "Indenture"), and that the Company grant a mortgage an security interest in the Project to the Trustee pursua Statutory Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Se Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement dated as of December 1, 1983 (the "Mortgage"). It is further prop The First National Bank of Saint Paul, in St. Paul, Mi issue its irrevocable Letter of Credit dated as of Dec 1983 (the "Letter of Credit"), in favor of the Trustee secure the payment or purchase of the princinal of the and up to two hundred eighty-five (285) days' interest by the uce � any, �sed d �st .n �- to a rity ed that .esota, �ber 1, 0 ;onds he�eon. • 3. This Council by actions taken on March 1, 1983, and April 5, 1983, gave preli.minary approval to the pr posal and on or about April 21, 1983, the Commissioner of Co erce of the State of Minnesota gave approval to the Project. 4. Pursuant to the preliminary approval of Council, forms of the following documents have been s to tne Council for approval: (a) The Loan Agreement; (b) The Indenture; (c) The Mortgage; (d) The Bond Purchase Agreement; ' (e) The Letter of Credit; and (f) The Preliminary Official Statement. tted 5. It is hereby found, determined and declax�ed that: (a) the Project described in the Loan Agre and Indenture constitutes a"project" authorized the Act; -3- t (b) the purpose of the Project is and the effect thereof will be to promote the public welf re by the acquisition, construction and equipping of facilities for use as a commercial office/warehou e building; (c) the Project is to be located within the City liinits, at a site which is easily accessible to employees residing within the City and the surrou d- �- ing communities; (d) the acquisition, construction and insta la- tion of the Project described in the Loan Agreeme t and Indenture, the issuance and sale of the Bonds the execution and delivery by the City of the Loa Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Indenture, and the performance of (i) all covenan s and agreements of the City contained in the Loan Agreement, Bond Purchase Agreenent and Indenture nd of (ii) all other acts and things required under he constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota t make the Loan Agreement, Bond Purchase Agreement, Indenture and Bonds valid and binding obligations of the City in accordance with their terms, are auth r- ized by the Act; (e) it is desirable that the Company be aut or- ized, in accordance with the provisions of Sectio 474.03 of the Act and subjeet to the terms and co di- tions set forth in the Loan Agreement, which term and conditions the City determines to be necessar , desirable and proper, to complete the acquisition and installation of the Project by such means as shal be available to the Company and in the manner determ'ned by the Company, and with or without advertisement for bids as required for the acquisition and installa ion of municipal facilities; (f) it is desirable that the Bonds be issue by tne City upon the terms set forth in the Indentur ; (g) the basic payments under the Loan Agreei are fixed to produce revenue sufficient to providE for the prompt payment of principal of, premium, : any, and interest on the Bonds issued under the Indenture when due; and the Loan Agreement, Mortg< and Indenture also provide that the Company is � f e t required to pay all expenses of the operation and maintenance of the Project, including, but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and insuran against all liability for injury to persons or property arising from the operation thereof, and a taxes and special assessments levied upon or with respect to the Project Premises (as defined in the Indenture) and payable during the term of the Mortgage, Loan Agreement and Indenture; and (h) under the provisions of Minnesota Statu Section 474.10, and as provided in the Loan Agree and Indenture, the Bonds are not to be payable fr or charged upon any funds other than the revenue pledged to the payment thereof; the City is not subject to any liability thereon; no holder of an Bonds shall ever have the right to compel any exercise by the City of its taxing powers to pay of the Bonds or the interest or premium.thereon, � to enforce payment thereof against any property o the City except the interests of the City in the : Agreement which have been assigned to the Trustee under the Indentur�; the Bonds shall not constitu cnarye, lien oz encumbrance, legal or equitable, any property pf the City except the interests of City in the Loan Agreement which have been assign to the Trustee under the Indenture; the Bonds sha recite that the Bonds are issued without moral ob tion on the part of the state or its political su divisions, and that t�he Bonds, including interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenues ple to the payment thereof; and the Bonds shall not consti�ute a debt of the City within the meaning any constitutional or statutory li.mitation. 6. Subject to the approval of the City Atto� forms of the Loan Agreement, Bond Purchase Agreement ar Indenture and exhibits thereto are approved substantia] the form submitted. The Loan Agreement and Indenture, substantially the form submitted, are directed to be e� in the name of and on behalf of the City by the Mayor < City Clerk. The Bond Purchase Agreement and any other documents and certificates necessary to the transactioz described above shall be executed by the appropriate C: officers. Copies of all of the documents necessary to transaction herein described shall be delivered, filed recorded as provided herein and in the Loan Agreement < Indenture. . -5- �e 1 r7 / nt a a- , th e ly in each in ecuted nd the ty the 7. The City hereby finds that the information section of the Preliminary Official Statement captioned Issuer" does not contain any untrue statement o£ a mater fact or omit to state any fact which is necessary to mak statements made therein not misleading, and the City her approves in substantially the form submitted to the City Council at this meeting such information.for inclusion i Final Official Statement; and the City hereby ratifies, confirms and consents to the use of said section in the Official Statement in connection with the sale of the Bo The City has not prepared nor made any independent inves tion of_ the �nformation contained in the Official Statem other than the section therein captioned "The Issuer," a City takes no responsibility for such informat�on. 8. The Original Rate, as defined in the Inden of interest on the Bonds shall be such rate per annum no than eight percent (8g) and not more than eleven percent as the Mayor, the Bond Purchaser and the Company shall a to, and thereafter the rate of interest shall be determi accordance with the provisions of t�e Indenture. The Ci shall proceed forthwith to issue its Bonds, in the form upon the terms set forth in the Indenture, with the Orig Rate established as provided in this paragraph. The off the Bond Purchaser to purchase the Bonds for $784,400 pl accrued interest to the date of delivery at the interest or rates specified herein and in the Indenture is hereby accepted. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and d to prepare and execute the Bonds a5 prescribed herein an the�Indenture and to deliver them to the Trustee for authentication and delivery to the Bond Purchaser. 9. The Mayor and City Clerk and other o.fficer the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furn the Bond Purchaser certified copies of all proceedings a records of the City relating to the Bonds, and,,such othe affidavits and certificates as may be required to show t facts relating to the legality of the Bonds as such fact appear from the books and records in the officers' custo control or as otherwise known to them; and all such cert copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heret furnished, shall constitute representations of the City the truth of all statements contained therein. 10. The apvroval hereby given to the various ments referred to above includes approval of such addit details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and �:� in the The al th e the inal ds. iga- nt d the ure, less (11�) ree ed in Y nd nal r of s rate rected in of sh to y and fied fore s to cu- nal uch 0 0 modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions to as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by t� Attorney prior to the execution of the documents. The e tion of any instrument by the appropriate officer or off �of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive eviden the approval of such documents in accordance with the te hereof. In the absence of the Mayor or City Clerk, any documents authorized by this resolution to be executed m executed by the Acting Mayor or the Acting City Clerk, r tively. Passed: December 6, 1983 ATTEST: (SEAL) City Clerk yor -7- 0 nere- City cu- ers of the be pec- - • �� association of metro�politan municipalities --- LOCAL :??�OlAL RcQUIREb1ENT CONFLICT: COIlPREHENSIVE PL�Ii - Z� Il 1oca1 Co: ��re:��nsi :-e Plan can be udo�=ed and amended b� a simple a City Co�.incil. Tnere is a reguirem.s�t tnat the official control etc_) canr_ot b� in con�lict with a Ca:�� P1an and the official con amended �_��ir. a prescribed time frar..� so as not to be in conFlic Rezoning r�qu_r�s a two/thirds major:Lu vote of the City Council. attorneys cZ�E v= �.i? Ot71.'11071 t173t L::@ �°�b 1.d17C1 USB Plannirg Act and thus su�ercedes the zoning ordinance. Therefore, develoornent occur per the C�_�p Plan regardless o= �ctual zoning. This raises points: .'�. Th•� r.o��, p�.:..�%�catior_, he�r..i.na ard ,voting requirements are Compre��ns=�e Plan amendment than zon_ing ordinance cnanges. the Co��r��n�s�ve P1an map could L=COtT.a the zoning docurznts, longer �e a p1a.-L�ing document. )NING majority vote of � (zoning, maps, :ro1s n=st be •. . Zoning and � Several , '.s pre-err�nent coul�' possibly some interesting ess strict for 'hus, � n reaZi ty, and would no 2. The p;��iic ..-�y oecone confused as to s✓hat is the legal la�d u e in sorr,e areas and a lanc dev�loper could begin �u�ing per the Comorehensive Plan rather than zoninc ::ap. 3. Becaus� it _s easier to muster a s�:�g1e r�.ajority rather than two/thirds majori�v ��e Co�prehensive P1an m.: � could become the ve��icle or zo�ing chanqes. The confl�c= �rc�?et-n as described in :;= foregoinq has aris�a in at least two rr�ember Atl:' �i��s �rhic:� were unable to r.rlster the two/thirds vote necessary to amending �:� z�:�i�g ordinance so that _� would not be in conF?ict with the adopted � Comprehens_�e ?_an. At the request of thsse cities, this issue w s corsidered by the A�4M !le==o_o==ian hgencies Committee with the possible idea of develoo.�ncr leqislatils pa_�cy to resolve this �p��rent problem.. The com�itt e, after thorough debate, dec=d�d it �aculd be prerature to see:c legislative action until after more input could � r�c�ived from member c�ties. Hence, we are callin this <zratter to your atten��ol-� �o facilitate such inpu�. The P.liM staff would b� 'nterested in receivinq tne =ol�o�,�ing information: J tlas th_s conf=_c;. .'veen d�irol.ile,� _.z �:.ur city, how did ycu d proble�, do you have suggestions =or solving the problem whic share ::=t'r. ot�er c� ties and do yoa thir.;� that we should pursu throuc� Legisla:�ve Action? Vern ?eterson is the A1119 Staff c Tllci t te'_� . ' 1 wi �h ti:e we could a solut_ior� tdCt i�1' fhls Law Offices of KRASS, MEYER, KANNING & WALSTEN Chartered Suite 300 Marschall Road Business Center 327 South Marschall Road P.O. Box 216 Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612)445-5080 Honorable Piayor and'2�embers of the City Council of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza �rive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mayor and Council Members: �10'�f ? � i ;�._� November 11, 1983 Phfilip R. Krass Barry K. Meyer Ph(lip T. Kannin� Trevor R. Walste This past I4onday, November 7, 1983, my daughter, Cathy, a Visitation School, was involved in a one-car accident on Lake Drive St. Thomas Academy. Cathy struck the front window with enough force it and sustained a concusion and apparently was unconscious for a st of time. She was, however, wearing a seat belt and shoulder harnes: believe kept the accident from being exceedingly serious. The auton which she was riding sustained approximately $4,000 damage. A Mendota Heights Police Officer named Roger Plath attend and was very helpful, courteous, and professional in handling this Richard Ploumen, who I believe to be a member of your Public Works also happened onto the scene and was helpful. In my opinion, this accident should never have happened an have happened but for the design and construction of the culvert the apparently constructed and does maintain at approximately the point where the road turns toward St. Thomas Academy. The ditch built to the culvert under Lake Drive is approximately five or six feet deep less than a car length in width. It is unmarked and drops off immed the pavement of the road. There is a shoulder-type area on both sid ditch; and it is almost impossible to see that ditch until you are o which is precisely what happened to Cathy. This exceedingly dangero could have been so easily rectified by the simple extension of the c ten or twelve feet and the filling in of the portion of the ditch im adjacent to the roadway. In the alternative, posts to protect vehic going into that ditch could have been constructed to prevent an acci this. I do not understand how such a dangerous condition would be a exist with the knowledge and indeed the upkeep of the City on any mu street, let alone a street the City must know is used daily by many ienced drivers going to Visitation or St. Thomas. Exasperating the situation even more is the fact that the or about October 27, cut down some trees in and around that ditch,'t from which extended onto the roadway approximately three feet in the Peralepals Susan M. Brown Barbara J. Hodslrom iunior at to crack rt period which I bile in the scene tter. partment, would not City has n Lake Drive ccommodate nd something ately from s of the top of it, s condition lvert another ediatel}� es from ent such as lowed to icipal ess exper- :ity did on ie sawdust area of the m Honorabl.e Mayor and Members of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights Page 2 November 11, 19$3 , acc3.dent, and covered much of the grassy area in front of the ditch, making it even mare slippery and dangerous. I believe the design, construction, and maintenance of this culvert di�ch by the City of Mendota was negligent, and that negligence caused or can- tributed to the 9,njury my daughter susCained and the damage ta our vehicle. I am making three requests af you as members of your Ca.ty CounciZ: l. Please stop by and look at this culver�, If you do, I think you will agree that a.t presents an extremely hazardous and dangerous condition and one which you can, with some ease, rectify by extending the culvert and fil.ling it in, ar placing guard barriers along the roadway at the point of the drop. 2. I wauld apgreciate being informed whether or not the City has in the past had either camplaints about the condition of that culvert ditch, or is aware Lhat accidents occurred regarding tha� ditch. 3. I am mak.ing a claim for the damages sustained agains� the City, and I wauld appreciate your farwarding a copy of this letter ta your insurer. PRK:dk File No. 1-1104-33 Li� . .�lt?•'hGtip� �.-r��cuYiYYE-G,�„� 1'.�c,.�h.t.uu1 i.��;.� �� ) Xours very truly, KRASS, MEY�.R, �J�,AI�tNING & WALSTEN i�: Krass r m w � ��n /� TRAFFIC ACCIDENl HEPUHT � O ,.,,,,,, ❑ ❑ 1 Q'�—pt �� (FOf1 POLICL USE ONLY) �""' �y, (l�lf ()F MONfI� D�Y YC�R n�Y f)f WFCK IIME C(IUNIV �/ .^ r � O.� /� 7C [�./ �� M }/),f.l (Y V � 1 I�� 1 � �CCIDEN! %(�� 2 /� � ��y� V V O/ V v � f'M � i/'r U I W P ,� . } u J �� AOutE SYStE1.1 ROUTE NUMBEN OR SIREET N�ME � �t INIERSECfION WIIN Z .� ON /� ! �,/ 5D0 ❑ ILES ❑ N ❑ E pi O /•'t I`�� V'� U�i� FEEi ❑ S W w' , N NOU�E SYS POUTE •, SIREET N�ME. CITY IIMITS, HEF POST OR FEA�uHE REfERENCE PO�NT HJI EIEM � Vl • • ��Q SW/�'1u' ---+--' --- � � � UNIT NO. 1- VEHICLE 1 UNIT NO 2— Q VEH 2 ❑ PED BIKE � '� DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER • 1 STAfE ONIVER LICENSE NUMBER • t STAfE I �-- - G�- o�- o �-s6� M�N�, iMST NAME MIDOIE LAST FIRST NAME MIDDLE UST �,[ 4 C/� �- " /a- NN GZ.A- SS R 1 SNUMBER AND STREET NUMBER AND STREET % Tl� S,i . � � CI7Y STATE ZIP COOE E CITY STATE ZIP COOE ��, 5 S P1=� I'�1, N,✓ ss3 � 9 R � �� DATE OF BIRTH SE% INVALID RESTRICTIONS CLASS O�TE OF BIRTH SE% fNVAIID ESTqICTpNS CLA55 ^ LICENSE NOT COMPLIED LICENSE OT COMPLIED 7 � / � ❑ WITN ❑ —J� � ITN � ��% W ' � L LA v FIRST NAME OWNER • t MIOOLE LAST - i"1 �-21 c- " �J %C4Z./�-s S . o � NUMBER AND STREET W NUMBER AND 57HEET ' N � fE 6 C�TY ��T� �r— 21P COOE R CITY STATE ZV COOE , �� I _ �� VEHICLE TYPE VEAR AND VEHICLE MAKE COLOR � VEHICIE TYVE YEAR AND VEH lE MAKE COLOR � MD C.� �31,,, S. V N K,. M �c L ENSE PL�TE NO YEAp STATE OF ISSUE NC OCCUP C LICENSE 7lATE NO YEAR STAT OF ISSUE HO OCCUP - ) n/�/ • � E 1 � DAM�GED UNIT NUMBER t � AEAR END 3 LEFT TUNN 5 6 RICMT TURN 8 HEAD ON D MAGED UNIi NUMBER 2 21 1 - INTERSECTION � 2 7 � H- � 1�— RIGHT �NGLE —� /�► -+ � 2 J � � J I ' 9 i0/ __ 5 D D �,Z OVENTAKING 4 OFF RD LEFT �� OFF RO RIGMT 9 SIDE SWIVE _� T � _ � ioeorTOM f— � � � r_ � ioso oM ?2 8 EST DOILAR AMT �_ _� e ' 6 EST OpLUR AMT �� 7 6 , ^ �� 1 ! . ; . . : + IND�cATE NORTH DESCRIPTION: �1 � h• - 1 � . BY ARHO� . �i O� � � � J � W�J �'� _.;;�'.._i :.: ..... :.....:. � �� o�i✓G r.vr�$To c��iL► �- �3 - ,, ._; . . . . . . . . . _, . . . . . ... P.�S ,� t s -- � ' ; . � -_ . . . . . .. : . . . . .. . . � ' • o S j 2v GT c � .v `L 1�! w�,4-S ' �.��.; �..;. .. .. ;.;.:,.: �-�,�; � nr� ✓; J r�1PN o .�t-1 ' ,._ � f ; , _ , � � � ��,_.+.� . ...:^' _ -�-' �..� ;. . . 3� v�P�-� Zon�E . S � w� S ` CJo t i i� � i' i � �� " I A/`G V i� � - '-i-` 1-,-�---�'..:---�w-- : . , � ' �_ � .� � �� _ .. ,..� .i i .: .- v � c u Gt.v � c N Tl� Ic.oA-A � ;i � � i � � �__; . i ' ' � I j i� i� ; i , , ; ,� , �-�i- � t �` -t-7_"1_�: "�_�- � - ; - • ;. T-��.i��. ;..., y �_,- ; .� ��_.+1. 1-� ING sP r�.� :��E'-zfL ��L 5N J O� ' f'j�{1L 6- � ' ��' ��:_ -�-; :. ` ; ._:._,,� i.� _� �_;._, � � ;�- � ; A A- ,� Q _�... :, ; � r T�-��, i t �,a � Tc.� . � s A�, �V'o ��-+ -�- -�—,.-� - ;..,.i . i-�-,—r-,—i-.;.�_�{_�.�_ -� ��- �-_ -�--� ; • �' ` �; �- �-��--{-+ i --�-;-' .`..}--t-j -i--t"- p ��2 C��S C�oN r v� � � ,�vG 12• �-'-_ _i`{- I"----� �-� ._:_! �_!..1_•.:_.�'_ . �.;_�_4.�. �, �� -�� _ _�_ '_'_._: 1_l..i_Li_� _� .i � +_�..,_ OFF T . S w�4.S � A-� w��r/� o ''.''��: , � ��-�.�..I.�.i _ �� --1-� _�_:_. �_. `�Z CO �o �/l!6 Pci T �� - d S W � � , ,-�--�-�--�-�-r. . �--�- � . . � � .� _.1�. ...}�, _ ., _ _..�.. _ ., .�..,I _' -! _ �_,--�- i � - , ,�. . _.�, o ,3 , I t I � � ` . ; ; ; � . ;� . , i 'l'1-��- C tr� � TN� �O ,0 , o , • . � :.. � ' �.',.•.'- � ��<:.'�'�y 4 i�ztY# _ �'�. �' '�:. �-r : > _ ' � 1.... • � : ti5 �.t' i,v 7'i: if.. ' 'M'f,"' ,.F' v �' S:iS• � :.14" �'�-i � - �:a�' _ . �.�:. �:Sr;�:s?9. :d-� :. ;,tr:� d0i�4'Bt+= ti`.C:tik•gE' :?,' ".iL � NAMES OF INJURED PERSONSlWITNESSES 24 25 28 27 28 29 30 ��' A { C � �x D � � y i j n s � o W < ■ � � : U(fICC11$ NANK ANn NAME BAOOE NO L� �� `O `� w DEI'ApTMENI OR AGENCY � j W N � L} AECOMMENOAIwNS S��N �rt-. 2 0�2 ��-`7-i� a� 3 � � ❑❑ � o= �[ C� ENGINEENINC s O O . -l�l _. $I4�C N�t S11EN CAL (111 ER CITY OF MFNDOTA HEIGHTS PLANNING CONIMISSION MINUTES � November 22, 1983 The regular meeting of the M.endota Heights Planning Commission was ca] by Chairperson Kruse at 8:04 o'clock P.M. The following members were Kruse, Burke, Butler, Blesener, Frank and Morson. Stefani was excusec present were Planning Consultant Howard Dahlgren, Public Works Directc and City Administrator Desi�nee Kevin Frazell. APPROVAL OF Minutes MINUTES Butler : Morson Ayes : 6 Nays : 0 Led to order present: . Also r Jim Danielson of the October 25th meeting had been sub'Imitted previously. moved that the minutes be approved as subl itted. seconded the motion. CASE 1�83-34, Mr. John Callahan and his attorney, Mr. Arnold CALLAHAN, WETLANDS present to request that a public hearing be set PERMIT a proposed wetlands permit for Lot 2, Willow Sp Said lot is at the northeast corner of Dodd Roa Mr. Kempe stated that he was present to answer commission members might have and to note any s to the proposed plan. He noted the petition f ; improvement and a waiver of hearing that is to City Council at an upcoming meeting, and noted proposing that three new lots be created in the stated that there may or may not be a need for proposed homes to be constructed and noted that prepared by the City Engineering staff, his cli 2. He noted that each new home would require a consideration by the Planning Commission and Ci mpe, were ith regard to ngs Addition. and Marie Avenue. y questions the gested changes surface water cou� presented to the at his client is lan. Mr. Kempe riances for the f the three scheme: t prefers Scheme etlands permit Council. In noting a 350± foot creek relocation, Chairper on Kruse suggested that the water flow, after relocation be slowed own. Public Works Director Danielson noted that that would b kept in mind by the Engineering department. Mr. Callahan is greeable to the dedication of a 40 foot easement along the n rth property line and along Dodd Road. Commission member Butler asked if the City has er relocated a creek before and Public Works Director Danielso responded, that yes, the Ivy Falls Creek was relocated. Planner Dahlgren noted that the purpose of relo to develop the land. He noted that parameters now but that individuals would have to come bef Commission for a wetlands permit in order to bu also noted the possibility of waiving the publi for each individual. Mr. Dah]_gren is to outli in his planning report, which is also to includ ments, etc. ting the creek is � ould be establishec e the Planning � d a home. He hearing requiremenl such parameters front yard require� Chairperson Kruse noted that there may be possiblle problems with fillin�, as the applicant may have to haul out t�he poor fill on �I Planning Commission MinuCes, November 22, 1983 • 1'age `1'wo the lot and bring in good �ill. The question of whether it would be possible to apply for a wetlands variance and ].eave the creek in its present location was brought up. There were no further questions from the commission members. Burke moved to set a public hearing for the January 24, 1984, meeting and to not hav� a December meeting. Frank seconded the motion. Ayes : 6 Nays : 0 CASE ��83-35, Mr. John Parkos, from Parkos Construction, was present with the DORNBURG, VARIANCE applicant, Judith Dornburg, who resides at 739 Pontiac Place. He proposes to construct a 16 foot by 24 foot addition onto the rear of the house and requires a variance in the northwest corner of the addition. He noted that the neighbors had submitted written approval. Commission member Burke questioned if it was permissible to have an entrance to the master bedroom from a den and wondered if the building code addressed that matter. Planner Dahlgren thought it was permissible. Mrs. Dornburg, in response to a question, noted that the whole house will be resided to match and that a new roof is planned for next spring. There being no further discussion, Morson moved to recommend approval of a rearyard variance as requested. Burke seconded the motion. Ayes : 6 Nays : 0 VERBAL REVIEW Public Glorks Director Danielson reported on Mr. Riley's Planned Unit Development and the several 7nning Ordinance amendments that had been presented to the City Council. MISCELLANEOUS Chairperson Kruse noted Kevin Frazell, the new City Administrator, and introduced him to the Commission members. Several questions were asked by the members, regarding their concerns on the TH 110/TH 149 interchange, the Shaughnessy home in Valley View Oak and the berming on the Kingsley Estates plat. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Commission, Morson moved that the meeting be adjourend. Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes : 6 Nays : 0 TIM� OF ADJOURNMENT : 9:OS o`clock P.M. " > Case No. CY � - � � , CITY OF MENDQTA HEIGHTS ; DAKOTA GOUNTY, MZNNESOTA APPLICATION FOK C4N5iDERATION OF PLANNING 12EQUEST Date of�ppli.catia: Fee Pai ,3� .Qa App].icant ( Name:_ �i � ��K� � \ 11�i�t7`�`F � , Last First Initial Address: �� 'j� C„_ �-� �Q (%�W�r�t Number Street City State Telephone Number : '� S '�% � �.i / ,� Qwner � Name: Y�- t�t.� 1+�. � �-t,�} �"�_ ` _ Last � First Address : �� ` � 7��.�(,,� 6"� lM� Number & Street City Street Locatian oE.Property in Quest3.on: 73 5' �o��.� ��..�►.-�-�_ Legal Descrip�ion of Proper�y: � �.s, ��- j/_ �i�� _ r� 7-' �? 7rYt1 t3 � I�SJ7 /1 Initial �i�� State Type of Request: Rezoning . • .' � Variance Conditional Use Permit Conditional Usa Permit far P.U.� • � Minor Conditional Use Permit Subdivision At�praval ' �" Plan Approval � Wetlands Permit � ' Other � t „/ `�^-- � � � � � J` / �� Z ig �( j � Z ip � s CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS M F�I O T0: Planning Commission November 16, 1983 FROM: Paul R. Berg and Jim Danielson Code Enforcement Officer Public Works Director SUBJECT: Case No. 83-35, Dornburg, Application for Rear Yard Variance for 739 Pontiac Place Mr. John Parkos, of Parkos Construction, has made application on behalf of Judith Dornburg, who resides at 739 Pontiac Place, in Friendly Hills. He � is proposing to construct a 16' x 24' addition onto the rear of the existing home. The proposed space will function as a master bedroom and den, which will contain 348 square feet. According to the site plan submitted, the proposed addition will be 25 feet from the established rear lot line. This particular lot is unique because it forms a point at the rear. The 7Aning Ordinance addresses, by definition, this type of lot in Ordinance No. 401, Section 3.2(70) as follows. Lot Line, Rear: that boundary of a lot which is opposite the front lot line. If the rear lot line is less than ten (10) feet in length, or if the lot forms a point at the rear, the rear lot line shall be ten (10) feet in length within the lot, parallel to and at the maximum distance from . the front lot line. The applicant has obtained signatures from the adjacent property owners speaking in favor of the requested variance. Staff would recommend approval of the variance subject to Planning Commission .; and Council review. \ �� . � ,v • r �' ( i ' ' : ��'.:: . . `\ 1 r,~'1 .�J r.. ':��,��''i , � r � � � i"�1h L}s . \ � ,� t� � r� � •�y��4. �� '1 � _i {.i ,. iC„' . . : t : . " ' ' ._�� '��,.;... � �,.F� � � . . � ^ ',� � - , �: i , : ++� "CVr.,:, �. , ... , :� � �.�.s.�y'� ,�, �� ' �g r: �'3• r;�' �;:..,�ry��:'�i,''r, �, '�.� 4 } ,r f :; �.n;.ra,:i�y 'r��. ^ 1 :i "w•:..�' y`� . '�t"' ' � � : ? M`w,�+��'..1,, �. � � - , - �-:..;f'�';�:�:...r: fi},,x�, . .; � - j � . . c;. is.,�::.; :;�:!fi � r�.. �..� � ' :� ' ' ii l.`� +r' � .: ', �'� ; r :` t%r;± �� +, ,y � • �. y , �'�.�t: `" ; '; .� . • � : 4 . , �. � . : •�. i. ' � ',., `J �. � •,; _ .~. , . : ., c,; 1,;,;. . �c ;... ' ,r �t, �.. . �,.ti:s,;t .... -:, � V:� �� ,�::;�.::�� . �.� �� . -::. � � �� -� , ��y , � �::��'�;;: k� ^ r •� + � i S ::i.. . � , ;e .,e:�?jyf�N��J� , +,%�: •4�,-. ��A� ' /I ' � .., C�'!r ��` .��''"t{��(� �� . Y .ka�,d:'r4;�:r"n3i,y. �j � , %! � � :v 5��i�%:��.,1 •,,,� ":. , c'`, :;:;,�'„t.;•=?,';i 4 �7_' .� �"��,.;;'�:.t:.,y, ',i.:��'' YC � ' �:,�diY�:� ..J%i � y .1.��,�r, a .t� `?�; j �!'� � � " � .�:ijC` w�t�twi'•'.`',� : � .. �f X+v.' . • 1'�` .1..4#',�� 5 _ � ,.�`'.�t.::;<<x��.�::� _� :.Y � �.. �-..f:�..:r • '�c,,„" ',;:;, �`�'a„�n• ,r..� � , . � :t.?-��+';�: � 3�� 1 r4� _ , � , i :r �. • -��,f.tq�y.. u'',6''�'. .� . . . < ., : ; » ti�'�.vi�f3i' }�,F�."1 � : �. .. .rjy:� �y��I< �i:,;��:�;+F*�1 �h�'1� �'�+.'�f F,� { ,` . � . < « I ,�',f.,,�'•�1'`�,i�� .,�.��.,�„ •i . u1'.• �: •i'��^'B.' A . �.'N��U{ �s ✓' P .t- 7"��.�,�'a.,i* :.�;_r?(, ��"�'{ •�'��''�� , �.:,�;:.; ;sY: � �'t��,� ' � . 'p "� `''; ?'; !: ' � . , ��.rnrc. ki a - �- . , F�'�,�. , �'�i � , . . � �=':'�r,�.:��?��:. .�,..,�j u, : '.✓y!i 4,f':jF��r� , _, ' ' .' .'<i 'r :'�.'.,t,� t��-.,�' y ., . - :.y.;�.' A�, ��..� . <��: +�li -;�� `;••'S' •s.' " rJ�t:S+F�ry � I �. • s. 4'� 4.��.•.. S.. ,;�,{��w ��. :� j�„r�1�C .. j _=S`•� ;,.' 2s t iF',�TC�'n�n.' j7sii ... .:: vj z;� . ��c+,..�,'f• ..., . �ra . .:.:�?:��a't". °� �:17 ��:.��{ntt,,4 .. � '','::� ,�y',Y:..}+j.'., :: rrK'• � , . �,.::.. ��#f�. <:,',: "',;::;z � • ' x �' - �y �`•'-� , �.� 1"�, Y��' �}yt .. . ." . ., ; �4.','�ii�`' i•.J.X.,:.��y, i:li 1. ' • :. y .7�ti n� �h,1Ryi� •r4 •�'�, . �iir'ir!��.=',�: �t7��• '� z•,�. . •'4��, ;.4j .(� Ir1.•F.;:�,:•,%k1 4 ' .+��}N� t�: . iCl'�.. �:��,�. �lu . ti�•r"�+::� 1. ,..T�I��! ,;?`��y"S .. . f `<�;w`rt.. ,:�,":>': ��' f'�"�t�l-?a , 3 „ :1i;!,,- �,C.�''' „� n•; , �..f .;;: ...,a.t4i�; . �5... �. -. ^'h��. i�i�•iP., r: �i. , N� pY.i:.. �:��:-�, ' rk �, p5 `+"'��ia��; � ,.0 :,afii.. '_,,�� ^ " � � '.Gjf•G ��'�{`.• � f ��"4�•' ��t• •'n ��s':i`e•:•i ��':�r rti�.�'rf'f7�Jtr: 'i t vL• �! 4,•i � i$Y;I.,�C y�,�,( I .,�,/"� . .�. ' '�r"i;y.�'y.:'+4� !,. .sr..u,+�'�i �� ,.�...aj�:�- F, ,q ; � % :;�,�.;:,i;�. ..�� !� r'�r;s,; r��.•�:�,;°' "r. s; � ,�; a., �n,;. �#'�`t c� ��'" 4' � �':;"' 1 �>r,. ++4»s,'r"i . i , �'.%!Y�`�+1$: � {i . ' ��',i`�i^2;. ! 8'.ih']l .. ' � J.�.ybs:`:,, �'��.ls�l':��fl�' ��i'1'TJ ` , . ., . , .},,,� ,;, s;�;�� 1 .�s ,. '.;,:w:�ri,�;, ;;i;;�'=:�q :. G ,J... ':. � : t�� .� ;�. , j��+J: 1 1{ "-,,: ., �.� ,..,�,-,.;.- , ,, :: fti ; . r.M �+, � .� � � n�+r w y.r,.,� 4 i`s': �r.' 'jr�y�f;{L;;`t n,4�'n;z7 • t:�.: tv•5'..�.�.�f� .).�:'�� _ C�: . J i�T.'i. • b j � ` , � ��;'.:.g •.: �'.:,�;r�:;,� j; <�,:`:,;. `.;". -;.,..'� �,�= , t� �. � � � �;:. ti � :� i=: � ' :` � '.�.:.,. � , v� '.. ,t •<:,,'= � . .. a�.l d . r. : �:'� : r•�.r.. . ' " .'C.; i�,�,.�1'k�""�::�y�.Y t•� r � K��',�y�;`�7.. , t i. =.��7n � ) ' .; �.Y' 'j; !7,- . .�4�1�i.��. ty"Ct. , �.. i /� , f:;,�: o;::,'�''xt��f�!'�'.`,Y+.'�-i+F+;i''�. 4�•'"i — �J i./ . � . . ;:e;$�`::'r�: r�ISta�'J�'..a:" �i,_'�r.� --y+ ity • 7 1'�'4•}i. �� L � � _ ,,� �. ;�;:;�'};L��;�.I' ,. � h}�•�;t;`�"a?':��t:'� �� s�s�`�� '�'' a% . � :._ ., .„ . :s-t1?k. �.!%�;G�:ij�';s�:1:i!?f r �,l;t.%- ".4ii:4wt�� ir'��'�•�,Y• � ,°i:)w:� ? %�:.+`,'�� i x tF`a ;ef,i J�. �i"� }',Y: � lnii� ° �'�"'sri��.;�}�..i t"" .. _j„�,� �;��,�,�+�i+Y�f'`7jt,��?,f. .r'.��,;Y`;f�. `ti;`�I,:��)�;7.��r i'+i1 �. ' .. .., . �� , �. �", . �'� . ,� _; ; . ,r;;`,i r ,,;,�;' , �� , ' `1�f � '� k�,:,�f,., .tt��.�� i ".r. , i:'Y; . . _�=�tii � '� • -tt^• '�N};�•� ( . • iy;,'•!;, t�rr.• „t , �'��'• �ft {iY':.• . � ' ;;� , �'}. - f� :rsNc(�. �,�? �� ;,.'r<<r'y. ;�.+�� f F ., ,a .' `,�Y',+,� �: �,.• ;'•_,�. . . <,:i� .�'t`'�f�•� �f�;;�'.; °,; t�$»; � � r� �`y •i(``>�1`.{„ } . r."``, �- ,,.. �,, ..�i? r' • �.� �:g� � , r; ; t.? ;tG'',�r�: rfrr{�.'i",;. tst';, �'P,ii:, � � ' �;.'_'= �y K ��i4%�' i.�'y'f�,Si! {J ��riF��.��,' 'I ? �.��: �:;+'_ : ff'�',:. i�it' "�i .f,,S"F! y ' . 's'F•; � ;�,":j: J �.�� .;f�'. � „ . �.i,:�� .r,:i�:', ��I.� . ! i:rt,.�:h,i'.'.l� .� �� [, i�'�(�', �.�'- �� .i{'�S^' °w, • ` .. � =:fy� ;+ �,�i;'s," . . � :.'�"'+Ri�.��.,'�iqNr!TK:i,.�.F . � •,�`'"'T��:F'v�rw+Vi,'�� c:y�. . . . :r�*.ir.,it ��, �1.. ,+�.�" Y{�x31�'�i�r `r t�'. �,y+ . , � . .. . i � � t • t } ,� � '�i r• Q ,4NJ! y,.�/�, �.,?ti/"�'�j,i _��J � 1( � �O� y •'�� Yi' .i.w. _ _ _!' _ (� �.�..i.��. �,. l 1 :� � 4�.. �,.�t ;: ,� i . :!�'c�;,.;�� ......% i `./% , "7"'i;: :�'�, ,'�h, � t 9 ;. ,: r:, ;��',y=`. a. .y �•.�-� , ..�,." C�' -'g'S�E..r^"'rq�y53' ,�� , ,t;ya... . ��r,; x!'. }„� {.?k�F� • x i �.i � t,Z}��'�}�'y��,, � f� ` a. �,i.��,Y 1 � "�" � �ti!'� ;�', � h�`t,'S':� �"c� '�"(: � :�r��"��iat�?;�� . , ,. ,'� , .� ;�..�,,�`;,.itk�� ;i�., � � s..`, ; ry� !�'�i+.i �1� i-';i�. �i i .y �..J t�p;:=��i�r'� � ' r � � :`t,+5si'� � ��,, . ''•`,ir r ' :•a. 'v:�" � ' �,��•. '�,iIC��X,�,y .F;�i �a.. • ;;�,r ' �x�'� i+ ryl�,� .t<� �L,�.4,�,r,!�'�r�,�'p, �'. «`�%�.`*�� `'•4��,y�"�L�~:`e',L�B${i'�.. � i�•` ' a ': ye`' � � : � � �. � , �''"'� ' �' '. <j �T1.L, i�•�' N . � . t : ;, . w� .r ''}�i0.�' ;'�"f"':, ��a�a;��'441� ♦. � . • .,ty t.s-,: .•1!�:"'! n :i1 �+�T f�f..:'.,�.:i � � .�•:".i�"ry :ii�{•1' i�1{,; 41'. i:'`�i� .{Ift"�i1::��'r. . „ ,. q * ,;: ql�•;,F«',�, •: t ;�'v� '' ;r,+.y' �,�K�x.j 1 j•� . � �`;�II2,� .`r ' f4�f�S '� .. �j. �,a;' .` M :ia:.�.i.+�if!.1.�. I�4'',�ii{�` '� i , i r .: .��A, 1 y �YGi' � i . ..'P��. Jt , �.i.=.v t"�J�tirAt'�ii, ; { i ... . . `' �`�(�� '�r+ � . . �. ��..a,: 1 , fr,�,^d �,�Y,t V '�:�.:.;' ' • '.,r,z,�•�,�t + �.,• . = ' # � '��+ ',1 nA�;�p';+1 ' ' � ^n7� i•� .�l'"�a'' r ,�.4' ..� r' y"•i. �'4, 3,. . .. :Z i ''��;y`, fr . - .1 � . �;��`:t��. ,..,�: . • . , � ; ;,,.:,,:.�,.. �� '. ; v ' ` ' � ,. ,,�;,� #�"' ., • ,��' ` 1, ':, ��>;� � :�+;;t� ;'' °;�;��# < < ,� R . � ;�i1 •.�.✓',:=z "� 7�,.p• , / � !�� .i.. :� � ,' , �LL �=:f•.,'�,{�.a.:'�.` .r�tFt', , j Y ` �j �^�.,t,• .�)«r� s ,/�'� !`r�`4�{ r. _c� �"�'2: � �„/ ': ' t�'' 4 st "%r, ::; Mj�'�.i � '+y�<; ' ��.;r Y�i/y'�'';�'' �S%�, ,ir^ °Y` .� . ::'�F�` ` :'� . ... �'ir,..:r ;`r` : y'}i:?!'� '` k� 'i�� ' c . : ` =: :.r': .yr�i�.:,,Z> d it�,� - • • .�.'i, :� i��:"J:' 3. 9�"i�:% '_h ��(ry ��Y"� S. �j� •,}'• '' :'�`• "'�i��``I;�'�� f'.`� Y n.y�.fJ�_� ; � ' . ^ �. , . ., t^C'�f +i�",'.','C.. ; { ' :k• .:,��fS�'�.I{:,Yj% ♦ __ � . � . _ � �•� ��:, i ?i"ti.n�� t � '. � � �� i'`t, . ..�;.. M1 � "�'.: � A � e �,�,fti.y� � f ��' t ; S {�t;, � :y j (.{�, `St I'7•T� •�` +; •�- 1�� !.; r .�'�c``��Y ''�y i �� . �: tfP.� iN ,b�iaia �✓ �� n4 ' 1,_ir,`��ti's�} �{fi. J qU, y, �' ��T . ,. .� :.�,y.:'. ' rr::i,KY'."'in ��'1��'?�x�� , M �'��:'�Y " �?�4•;`t,,•{i'�.."..r i;�,r.. 1 . ,�i��' �k'9,� � 1 � ' l :b. .�k� 1:_��' �z'�':�!�rrj,.i� ;�r� ,::i�- a' c •e" 'a, y`K. �.s, `a.:�",;!a;.bi:.,`. rt,��"� ,n� ' .. : .�'� ..v,C:3`J�TY r�MMi.+. re � , . . �J. �i)�� A �� '��:Y;�,'t i : � ;:.�G�;�r� . '.tiF ;�i+i�{ :tSt y.3: 'a.ir. ' r�'6:. 'aiV: � • �.�. `�. ry.`,1 ,,•.� .�i? .��' 1�j)�� j� � ; '~ ' '�Ys };.(�.'!!1'��ti;,41�•��',S:W��ii ��i. < . .. ,.,.,: :. �.::.�.• .;, �=. �.��. . • , �`�Y;;:.7.�.,. ;.=t��'{•� r)jh;,�� +�' ; � •.is .''�' ••Yj� _.�i ��Lx'�l��I~� �4. . , ._ . _ _��. �.t'-� � ' , .,'*^ �l}:y``.tFu;ji" '.r'r ��Lii�� f,i� y � *�T.� : ' �'. S x �; :.`�i�'„z `. �f. y� - �iti. : •.t� ..i.�:}:::a� ':�• 33�'kt.:i.� •t��. .r.E'_:'y.�, j.%..�4�n`•{w,Hiy.i.ii(�� : y.�f •''�ts -� '" �T� t, + , U�R • •�t. ,':a'.;�,' '�•a%�:i{ d&;�k:A' �P%, ".n .f•.' '•'£ i• ' �'�' '.,C�f, . t , ��, i �i w; 4:�j�� i`�; •i '�1. ,4,,4' }+t -.� r� t !::� , •'�' ; . ,;y`�y�.'tr. ,� ' 'l;� �i;:� i^ '+ ; � '� M�.t� • �. , ' �;%• � ..: � '+'':"�},� � ;c� ' . :,�;:,�,�,'; ��.k;;'.;.•:..''t'^�;.:`�'� '" ; .�w� ;�,:;',:� :s,:�.r.•� ;.-. -. s;�..`;� ,, n i.,iri�i�ytr��.•F4 H�•.:.41v�_,�LV 1.1:.'-• �MI. {} �ia• '.?i. ji' �e;�"i'x.� .,: � 1, 1' ..t .�w?'� •t1�'1 ' :'�"." '?',.Jt. ±�;5�.'I��. 'F�.. �.{.:: � k'��1, jW� J. .. : },+.:�t�. `'iti� .`r?��=:•" :h �� \�Y: 4.:�Y. jt. n .�i,".� �'�v 7 �. . ,. ,.,� �?+`,yr iqy�„ ��t� ., �x�,'i i� ' t'fWs+'�''��` '3 � ' i"� Ci'^ h.� '. . ::1{. n�ry-�f . ' 4. . � , �� .�`..� �:,':.:. i' ' 7 t�f . . . •,t. a. ' 'e. ' .{1) . 's +':T;sf ,.�._i �}i� . t� � � , z; •:,j� .`j;`3ri.,� � . • t. 1� •, .t'(1;�M'� 'i�'�i'�ys�}� 1., +.i�a,.`F' -1./.•'v� ��'' f��'L.•. p _ p� 'A 't:° ,rt.".i l,. "£�i. �' . :+'�5.� i ,->.- .e- � �� : a�.::r .=a � ��? •, ^ .•1. YNF' "K#{' '�Irly['+ •;ttini� '�l ' : . . ��:�� :^r�� ,?.d`ii�i�.'r�'��,y^`��{�� i` i�Y�j ''y ,r.� ��•t'fY 4.,�.24�# t, J'�'• '�.� •:1 '%a � 1 ` .l.,q:�te;51' '�-�%Cr.r. � , � a:.: 4:.i: i':;[::� ;::�c}� _��k,. ' �k •� :.�. � r.1.�.. ,.S.i.' t, � �;�Sfi'�1•�;��N`'�� .�'t . . �!«� • ,�r4�. . , _._ . .,..��.i::.'�i��'�+��8= . " . . , .t.y'��'�,•�� t}8i � �' . . . .-��;:7�''��' �r,i : "`, j`J'o,,t''1 '♦Lr + �r 'rl^`+ .�ill'41.`.� , 4 : i , . . ;�� . PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDEP.ATIONS: 22 November 1983 83-35 Judith L. Dornburg Northwest Corner of Curve on (see Sketch) Approval of Variance to Rear Y �ntiac Place Setback l. The Dornburgs own a home at 739 Pontiac Place which is Lot 15, B ock 11 of Friendly Hills Rearrangement. The Dornburgs propose to add a 1 foot by 24 foot addition on the northwest side of the house providing ex ansion for a master bedroom suite. P7e have discussed the proposed addition to the house as it relates to the existing plan. It appears obvious th t for the purposes intended, the addition as proposed can only be accompli hed on that portion of the lot where construction is currently planned. • 2. The lot in question, as you will notice from the attached ske'tch and the plan submitted by the application, is a triangular shaped lot, w ich in effect has no rear lot line. Section 3.2 (70) of the Zoning Ord nance (page 9) designates the policy for establishing the rear lot set ack in such cases. This section of the Ordinance states: Section 3.2 (70). Lot Line, Rear: That boundary of a lot w ich is opposite the front lot line, if the rear lot line is less than ten (10) feet in length or if the lot forms a point at the r ar, the rear lot line shall be the line ten (10) feet in length ithin the lot, parallel to and at the maximum distance from the fr nt lot line. That statement defines the rear lot line in the case of a triang lar shaped lot. You will notice that on the applicant's drawing of the sit plan, that she has drawn this ten (10) foot long line near the apex of the ngle at the northwesterly corner of the lot. Measuring a 30 foot distance f om this line places a triangular portion of the building within the requ red 30 foot rear yard setback. The applicant is seeking a variance so as to allow this portion of the addition to be placed within the prescribed 30 f t required rear yard setback. 3. The applicant's site plan is drawn at a scale of 1/16"=1'. Scal portion of the addition within the 30 foot setback indicates tha protrude 4.8 feet into the 30 foot,rear yard. The applicant upo from the City Staff has received written permission from the con owners on Pontiac Place. These statements of approval, you will written on the site plan itself. g that it would advice guous lot te, are CASE NUt�iBER: 83-35 22 November 19�33 APPLICANT: Judith L. Dornburg Pa9-'- 2-~ 4. You will notice that the side yard setbacks of the existing home, and the . addition, exceed the ten foot minimum requirements. Thus, under the circumstances it would appear that the proposed protrusion into the required rear yard will not constitute deleterious impact on the contiguous land owners. / . � /� . �� . 5 �ti. ., ,� - � - — - - � „�., ; � � :.� �1° ��\ '~ ~ � �'° � CASE NUMBER: 83-35 b` 4 °+° APPLICANT: Judith L. Dornburg !1 .' ti o5 ,,, q ACTION: Approval of Variance to Rear s- e Yard Setback v : ' � 5 6 ll �" sr� � � 6 E J o � i �s� ` �� 1 V r. S ,5 J - ` / _ 0 � )� �o � j i '1 v F . � ��, ` ,45� � ��` ', q � \ � 7 � r � � �k� �r . `' ,t�� o. /o � �N � •Qi , • • � � 1 �` x �q • ` 8 ,. ° J ... '•' B M � � � . �� z yk b � � � 9`y� �` J �� o c � ��'� �4 V �u `�.b 1 J � r • ^ a ft $ \ L Q •b 4 a � 'rt 9 ti• i z ,� ,- `a - � 5 Q 7 4 ��' � v ��'� .f'r `� s y o � �, � ,�, � r � v e k. i 0 � � �� .� �� J • �, ! 0 I j N '�Q � �` s Z . . . � y o . 10 � iiots- ~ Fi . ^l 1 « 1 S � o e o� �� d� � 3 � �s'� t� +' �' � IG 5 '?�� ` s sr �� ti 2 d!�1 .a ios vz � o r I ` 0 14 o w � o �� .� `'' �` a • S . G a � v � A s� r� a, � �., �: : �O 9 8 1 10 L3B�' 3 ao cc \ %'` • n � � � e �.i - L! i ti J (�. e� �OZS< O L _ 9 eo� � fa k� : ° 3 �o � . �is ai� ,,' ` 9`� � °�o. / C H EY ENI�E )o� a f% o af � � V �Z?..ro je �3S.tS 7� Q�7 . \ � p � d N • i �� F a� �i t Y ♦ M �l I p � � � v� "l : ZC A ( 2„F D � Z . r ,� �`eY L, o*�o ., � y,,< <:, � �• ; i 2 � Z y � cs9 �y k Z ' �� ` 3 I � ` ` y 9 S � �? ° +V . !�! d r S^ � s�o4r ` a j r 2 4 � �� os o a a �-20 •� q a u, � Ir kb 'o�a4 8` 4°S �` ' ''• P�G 4 D 2 ND F 3 0� /D � r�' �i i3 'J FOR DEfA1L S �rG. s r� � �t v �,��3 'c ,�° Q �z d p 25 � 7s•so � � � 3 S J C ^ �i' , 4 � . <.s r� j �'�� c Z o5 's i� � � � � .a � /V T �: �4 1 /3 ,,. -� � � 3. •.r y h aa si � , ��a �� :�� ° `r � ' io J � �:. � s o ^, t o o ,.1 c -} .,'1� 5 c, ` ia _ . . � � 5 /� �° 6 11 �Y y J4� �, �� '� J '� 1 0�, I �lSi-7 0 � � io v 1} " S �C � ��q , �o a i. ' � � ° ' p Y T. ! ��e ` /ai' �tt[ c�Si ��J � � � _ \� /L ' \ ��- � � �a o r� c +� y , , - . � 9r 'S' �. 0 1' � 7 \ • . o ! ..y � y w � 7 � � J - J'�6 � 14 0 �s V S� � � � 9 � ' � � � 1 4 �r o � � )�, 'r / � ti L � y � Z �d• ; M i'= stJ �ia io �7 5 y�(� �� s�f ` "Q �` � B - io o s � � r 7 9 0, S�` � a � "<< � ` � y� `0 5�o � � .Z� ` S �°'` 5" ''>�, ° 5`,- ` 0 /1 � �. J� ¢ � D i J�l_ REALTOF� ' R. M. PA1:I2AN'1`O CO., INC. - r'S� / - r� �ir f l�./ • • ///irril.11 l.l / ltiO:i l;\IV1�:I251:1`1' A�'P:\I't�.. 5T. YAC'I.. JIINNPSO'l`:\ 3:i1(�4 •r�:i.N:��uc��r;: (c�i•�) sac-2u:sr� Charles Mertensotto Attorney at Law 1100 West Seventh St. St. Paul, Mn. 55102 Dear Charlie: for her balance due of $750.00 of my money. November 4, 1983 � �C'`a. m socierr oF REAlESTATE APPRAISERS n � r�� I enclose a copy of the bill from Mendo�a Heights $120.00. Facts of the matter are, they have stolen When I applied for a variance to build building it was suggested that I bring in a rendition of the building and if it was at- tractive and a desireable improvement, the variance would probably e granted. We then proceeded to spend $3,500 on architectural services to desi n what the architect felt should be built on the site in question. • After meetings with the City of Mendota eights, it was determined that rather than ask for a variance, a new zoning or inance be submitted. This would cause us considerable delay, but we had also heard that others had been requesting the same kind of new ordinance and it se ed to be time to proceed on that line. When we submitted our request for appro building to the Council, we were asked for an initial $750.00 depos a total of $1,000.00. I was told directly by a planning consultant additional $750.00 would be snent in an analysis of the plans I was Instead, the planner chose to write a new ordinance and charged me First he swallowed the $750.00, and then added a$120.00 bill to th A total cost that he would like me to pay of $870.00. If the City of Mendota Heights wants a it's their business. I don't. The purpose of submitting the plan to gain approval on the basis of quality. of construction, fireproo attractive condomini�n structure. The purpose of the ordinance pro not for our sole benefit, but rather for the benefit of the City as To take my funds to pay the cost of writing a new ordinance, an ord should be written by attorneys, is a misuse of deposit funds. I would appreciate your explaining this the City Council and introducing an ordinance to refund the $750.00 taken from me and to forgive the bill enclosed in the amount of $120 1 of our , making hat the ubmitting. r his time. amount. w ordinance, did was durable, sed was whole. ance that lem to gf ully _' ' i .. - " .. ..s,. .., . _l , . -zr. �.. . .,� .. � _ Charles Mertensotto -- , � , Attorney at Law Page 2 • I believe it is important to note that the proposed ordinance was not the basis of the reject of the ordinance, but simply the un- willingness of the Commission members, except for "Blesener" as shown in the attached minutes. Thank you for your consideration in this mattere Yours very truly, R.M. Parranto Co., Inc. _ � , �� ,�,� Richard M. Parranto enclosures cc: Tom Curley ,�% �� : � I" r� h �r� � 7'Lr ►s�l/ �t w i'/� �/u�� df" i�v i' f"ii �''Y%� o`s5 t.� +�� as cr' i�/�"61% CITY Or MENDOTA HGIGNTS M II�10 November 22, 1983 T0: City Council FROM: Orvil J. Johnson City Administrator SUBJECT: R.M. Parranto Letter Response The preceeding letter from Richard M. Parranto was addressed to by Councilman Mertensotto. As you recall, the letter was presented at 15th City Council meeting. Council direction was to put it on the Dec with appropriate researching and information; hence this memo. r� o,¢ rQ, �- �i: r�7� /��'� nd received the November mber 6th agenda The various innuendos and phrases as presented by Mr. Parranto reflect his method of communication. The accompanying written records are quite silent, reflect- ing only the facts and premises as recorded in City documents. The point: Parranto's presentation is quite vivid, the records are quite dull, therefore th's memo will fill in any voids. Parranto's application for planning action was dated November 1 submitted to the City offices on December 3, 1982 (see Exhibit 4�1). time, Mr. Parranto used Howard's planning services for one-half. hour again used Howard's services for one hour on October 7, 1982. Under stances, petitioners and land developers normally have one half hour Howard to discuss their plans. In this case, Parranto spent three ti amount of time (without charge) to discuss a plan that deviated exten City's established zoning, plan. , 1982, but rior to that n September 7th a rdinary circum-. �ssion with es the normal ively from the Then on December 3, 1982, when Mr. Parranto submitted his planni�ng application, the City Cler.k requested a$750 escrow deposit, in addition to the $25�I0 planning fee. $750 was asked to cover anticipated planning expenses because his schekIne was judged to be unconventional and therefore would require more than the usual a,knount of pro- fessional services. � Since the Planning Commission had met on December lst, Mr. Parr application was considered at the January 25, 1983 Planning Commissio of those minutes (see Exhibit ��2) are attached and you are ur�ed to v read those minutes as concerns Parranto's planning request. Note tha present and that his proposed plan "exceeds the City ordinances in ma fore he asked for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance". You will no Commission, in response to his request, recommended that the staff de multiple residential zoning district for a public hearin�. You will lengthy January 25, 1983 Planning Report (see Exhibit ��3), wherein he considerable amount of researching to advise the Planning Commission between Parranto's proposed plan and the City's current �oning requir to's planning meeting. A copy y carefully Parranto was respects, there- that the Planning lop a new te Howard's rather resented a the differences ents. - After the January 25th Planning Commission meeting,, Howard prep red a rather lengthy and comprehensive report responding to Parranto's request. Ob iously Howard had prepared information as directed by the Planning Commission so that Parranto's plan Page Two and an appropriate Zoning Ordinance'could be considered by the Planning Commission and others. Howard's report (see Exhibit 114) was distributed to all members prior to the February 22, 1983 Planning Commission meeting. At the February 22nd Planning Commission meeting, the commission members discussed the proposed R-3A 7.oning District as prepared by Planner Dahlgren. The Planning Commission members spent a considerable amount of time discussing the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment. Mr. Parranto was not present to participate in the discussion. The Planning Commission had Howard's report for discussion purposes and were deliberating as to whether a hearing should be considered. After a very lengthy discussion, "Frank moved, seconded by Stefani, to not consider an R-3A Zoning District for Mendota Heights at this time. Voting: 4 ayes, 2 nays, I3lesener and Morson". Therefore the Planning Commission had expressed disapproval of Parranto's development concept. (See Exhibit 1�5). The next consideration of Parranto's application was scheduled for the City Council meeting of March l, 1983. As you will note from the transmittal memo (see Exhibit l�6), the City Council agenda and all other appropriate information from the Planning Commission was mailed to Mr. Parranto on February 24, ].983. As you note on the City Council minutes of March l, 1983 (see Exhibit 4�7), "no one was present to represent the applicant with regard to the application for zoning ordinance revision. No action �vas taken on the matter". Should any financial relief be given to Mr. Parranto? EDITORIAL: City staff is not privy to the land owner/applicant relationships in this saga. Obviously Tom Curley owns some land and has some interest. Richard Parranto, as a realtor and developer, has interests also. Tom Curley has contacted me wondering what he got for his money. I advised him to contact Parranto. That action, no doubt, prompted Parranto's letter to Councilman Mertensotto. In my opinion, the development of the area southeast of Lexington and TH 110 is still subject to a considerable amount of differences of opinion. Curley has had a multitude of ideas on how to develop it. This recent example seemed to exhibit a sincere amount of interest, however for unknown reasons, the matter was not pursued diligentiv (at least up to this point), and now an interested developer expects the City to absorb the professional costs involved. I suggest and recommend that the next deliberations on the subject area be continued only upon payment of the additiona7.$120. , Applicant Name: Case No. CTTY 01 MENDOTA HEIGHTS D�'1K0'rA COLJNTY , Ml'NNESOTA APPLICATION FOIt CONSIDI.RATIQN OF PLANNI�;G 1tEQUEST f�_�_�.Z Date of Applicar an 11/10/82 Fee Paid $250 `� 9'/ f � $750 - e crow depasit M. � Ra.chard Last 'First °.Cnitial Address: 1603 University Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 Number & Street City State Gip Telephone Number: 646-263$ Owner Curley Mary A. and N��: Curlev Thomas 0. Hu band and Wife, LasC Fa.rst I�iitial ea an un xvi ed � in erest. Addrass: 175I Lexington Avenue South, Mendata Heights, MN 55118 Number & Street City 5Cate Zip Street Location of Property in Question: Cn�ythcact nF Grn,rhPa�t r�nrnPr nf T,exinQton AVe. and Hwv. �..1.�, Mendota H 1QIlt3, M� Lega2 Description of Property: ,.. Lats I thru 9, Block 1 and Outlot B and 4utlot C, except tha Glest 19b f et of the North 18S feet and except the East 230 feet thereoi, Curley's Valiey View. Type of Request: � x Amendment to zoning ordinance. Re zon in�.; Variance Conditianal Use PermiC Conditi.onal tJse Permit for P. ?�Iinor Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval Plan Approval i�'etlands Permit Other ct�rY OI� hiGNDO�rn ►iric��•rs YLANNING COMMISSION MII�U'fLS January 25, 1983 The regular meeting oE the hiendota Heights Planning Commission wa by Chairperson Kruse at 8:04 P.M. The following members were pre Morson, Blesener, Iiutler and Stefani. Burke and Frank were excus were City Administrator Orvil Johnson and Planning Consultant l�low APPROVAL OF MINUTES CASE 82-24, JOHNSON BROS. (CCNDOR CORP.) CONDITIONAL USI: PERMIT Minutes of the December lst meeting had bee previously. SteEani moved, seconded by Mor minuCes be aPproved as submitted. Voting: Chairperson Kruse noted that the hearing fo had been continued From the November meetin; had been advised that the applicant has cho llis application, therefore Kruse noted that closed. called to order ent: Kruse, d. Also present rd Dahlgren. submitted on that the all ayes. Johnson Brothers but that staFf �n to withdraw rhe hearin� was CASE 83-01, PARRANTO, Mr. Dick Parranto was present to discuss hi application, ZONING ORDINANCE noting that his proposed plan exceeds the C'ty ordinances AMENDMENT in many respects, therefore he asked for an mendment to the Zoning Ordinance. His intent is to con truct a four to six story multi-family highrise condomin um on the southeasterly corner of TH 110 and Lexingto . This development suggests a density of 19 units er acre. Planner Dahlgren noted that in most cities, a densi y of 15 units per acre is acceptable. The density of the existing multi- family zone approximates 10 units per acre. Mr. Dahlgren also noted that most cities allow a three s ory structure and that a conditional use permit would be nece sary to allow four to six stories in a new zoning distric . Planner Dahlgren also updated the commission briefl on the "downtown' Mendota Heights study. Mr. Mark Finnemann, architect for the proje t, was also present for the discussion, which centered n the project, and not on the rezoning amendment. After some discussion, Butler moved to reco end that staff be requested to develop a new multi-residen ial zonin district for a public hearing. Morson seco ded the.motion. City Administrator Johnson noted that multi le uses shou d be considered. Blesener added a friendly amendment, sugges ing that "district; should be included in tl�e motion. Morson 'se onded the motion. Voting on amendment: 4 ayes, 1 nay, Stefan�. Voting on original motion: 4 ayes, 1 nay, tefani. � L'lanning Cc7�mnission itinutes, January 25, 19$3 P,igc 'l'wo Several commission members expressed tlieir opinions, with I3lesener wanting a general discussion on down-zonin�; and mixed use. Morson noted ti�at he did not tliink tl�is site � shoul.d be a commercial site. Chairperson Kruse staCed that staff will come back with a proposed zoning ordinance at Che February meeting and also with some typical ordinances Erom otller cities. The Commission could take a look at ttiese and probably set a public hearing on tl�is application for ' tiie March meetin�. There was some question as to whether this should be done at a work meetin� or at the end oE the February agenda. Chairperson Kruse noted to the applicant t}�at just because he voted in favor of the motion tonight, tt�at did not necessarily mean that he would vote in favor of a zoning ordinance amendment to allow this proposed project. e ... �. . � ' , ,i • �, ,' 25 January 1983 • � � . - , • •• PLANNING REPORT ' . ' '., , CASE NUt�IBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLAidNING CONSIDERATIONS: 83-01 Richard M. Parranto Southeasterly Corner of Trunk ic and Lexington Avenue (see sket h) a y 110 Adoption of L1ew Multi-Resident�ial Zoning District � 1. Mr. Parranto and his architect have visited with the Staff on t occassions� prior to this application. Their intent is to construct a four to six story multi-family highrise condominium on portions of the Tom C rley property easterly and southerly of the furniture store, gasoiine station, and convenience stor� at the southeast corner of Lexington and unk Highway 110. Attached are copies of a preliminary site plan, building plan, existing site plan, and a data sheet outlining the scope of the development of the land. This information is supplied by the a for the purpose of demonstrating the intent and need for the ne district. The design of the proposed development, of course, i subject of the approval process at this stage. The question at is whether or not the City is desirous of having a zoning distr accommodate such a proposal. If such a district is amended to Ordinance, the applicant would then presumably apply for develo under the terms of that district. rspective, roposed licant zoning not the his point t that would e Zoning ent approval 2, The City already has a multi-family residential district. The ensity varies according to a formula relating to the type and scope of develop- ment. A copy of the provisions of that district are attached fo your information. The density of the existing multi-family zone approximates 10 u The development proposed suggests a density of 19 units per acr difference between the densities is substantial enough so as to to handle the proposed development utilizing the existing provi Zoning District with a variance to the density. You will recal the Mct�ulty people proposed to develop a townhouse project in a zoned to require 40,000 square feet per unit that the Council p have the new zoning district adopted providing for the 30,000 s per unit required in that project. That chaiige represented a S increase in density (decrease in the amount of land area requir The proposed density represents almost a 100 percent increase i so it would seem the adoption of a new district would be more a than attempting to process a variance to this degree. its per acre. . The not attempt ions of the that when area �posed to sare feet percent � per unit). density �ropriate CASE NUMBER: 83-01 APPLICANT: Richard M. Parranto DATE: 25 January 1983 Page 2 3. Typical multi-family �nes accommodating condominiums in the metropolitan and suburban area approximate 15 units per acre. The City of Roseville allows approximately 17 units per acre, Saint Louis Park allows approximately 20 units per acre, the City of Hopkins allows up to 40 units per acre. Higher densities such as 19 units per acre cannot be reasonably accommodated on the land unless the structures approximating about five stories in height are utilized. 4. The basic question is whether the City desires such higher structures, and the consequent higher densities within the community. We suggest that the Planning Commission discuss this issue at the meeting in January, offering direction to the applicant and the Staff relating to this policy question. Should the Planning Commission and Council desire us to do so, we shall prepare an appropriate zoning district as an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance as was done to accommodate the McNulty townhouse project in the southeast corner of the City. S. In consideration of the aopropriateness of this step, we suggest that a dialogue with the applicants regarding their marketing and development strategy would be helpful. It should be borne in mind that the adoption of such a district will make its provisions applicable to other areas in the City. Such use of a new zoning district would, of course, have to be preceeded by an application for rezoning, and approval of development plans. Approval of this zoning would not necessarily imply approval on another site. The point is that a new zoning district should not be adopted to serve a single site, but should be appropriate for Possible application to other areas. 6. In general, the construction of higher density, highrise structures enhances the tax base. This is particularly true if units are designed for the accommodation of empty-nesters and others constituting a small family size. The tax assets at the municipal level for commercial and industrial development is shared with other communities through the Fiscal Disparities Law applicable to our Metropolitan Area. Residential units are not subject to the provisions of this tax sharing revenue method. It may also be true that the concentration of higher density residential units in the vicinity of "Downtown Mendota Heights" near the intersection of Trunk Highway 110 and 149 may be appropriate. SECTION 10. "R-3" MULTIPLE�FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRI 1.Q.1 Permitted Uses � Wi�hin the "R-3", Multiple Family Residentzal istrict, . no structure or land shall. be used except for ne or more af the fall.owing uses. Al1 applications far b ilding permit wa.thin the "R-3" District shal.l be subm'tted for Ci�y Council approual prior to issuance. 10.1 (1� Dwelling structures of �.wo (2) or more units. 10.1(2) Public parks and playgraunds. I0.1(3) Those uses iisted and as regulated under Sectio�s 7.1(3), 7.1(4), and 7.1(5}. 10,2. Conditional Uses Within the "R-3" Da.�trict, no structure ar land shal3 be used for the following-uses except by conditianal us permit. i0.2(1) Single famiiy re�idence. Z0.2(2} Private clubs and lodges which are not opera�ed, 10.2(3} Fraternity and sararity hauses. 10.2(4� Private schoalst universities and colleges. 10.2 (5} 10.2 (b} � for profit. Private swimming pools intended for and used sa ely by the occupants of the property on which it is locate and their gue�ts, provided: (a} the water surface of sai paol is located not less than fifty j50) feet from any lat line; (b} tha� the pump and �i1.t�r installed be not iess t an forty (4Q) �eet from any lot line; and {�) that the pa l area be sa fenced as to prevent uncantralled access from the street or fram adjacent property. � r„ Those uses listed and as regulated in Sectian 7. Permi�.ted Aecessary Uses Within the R-3 District, the following uses shal� be permitted accessory uses. . 10.3(1) Any accessory us� permitted in Section 7.3 of th s Ordinance and as regulated therein but subj�ct to such fur h�r restric- tions and regulat.ions as araplicable and specizie herein. ].0.4 Lot and Buildinq l�r�a and Building Heiqht Requir�ments and Llmitations �� 10.4{1) No limit shall be plac�d on th� height of buildir f�-3 District. {401j 4"a gs in the ved; 10.4 (2) ,ot � 10.4(2)a five . - � i��'? ' • 37i-` - The followinct mini_;mum yard requirements shall be observed: �� :. t;. . �Front yard��of at least. fifty (50) feet plus one (1) • foot � per each one-(1) foot��of building height over seventy-five , (75 ) feet. 4� - � . �ne-ha1f10.4 (2)b Side and rear yards'.of a£ least forty (��1 f.eet plus one-half :venty-five (1/2) foot per one."�(•1) -.foot of building height over seventy-five .n g se r :t . ' (75 ) feet. . � � �t . 10.4(2)c No principal building housing more than two (2) dwelling units, shall be less than fifty (50) feet from any other such building. •- -;. 10.4(2)d Minimum lot width shall be one hundred fifty (150) feet. �.� - . :ss 10.4(2)e No lot shall be de'veloped separately if its area is less �rved than twenty thousand (20,000) square feet. Lots not served frea by a public seweraqe system shall have a minimum lot area a(10 , 0•00 ) of thirty thousand (3.0., 000 ) square feet or ten thousand (10 , 000 ) _s qreater. square feet of lot'�area per.dwelling unit, whichever is qreater. : shall 10.4(3) The followinQ per unit minimum floor area requirements shall be observed: „ ' Efficiency Units,' Not Permitted One Bedroom Unit's'� �� 750 square feet Two Bedroom Units 800 square feet. � Three or More Bedroom Units 1,000 square feet .; � . ;rement�0.4(4) The followinq minimum lot area per dwelling unit requirements � shall be observed: ``� ' � '- '�`�° � � . � �•1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom t .. �q. �t. �� , decreased 4 (S ) �ided under 10.5 f? of this ��k�ing �all 10 5 (1) ''t be ��:� :� �1:imum � �-'icient �;h e z�,�ired 1 Story � ,•;S,O50 sq. ft 6,000 sq.ft 6,630 sq.ft.� 2 Story :;'� 4,400 " " 5,220 " " 5,770 " " 3 Story or More ��.4,080 " " 4,840 "" 5,340 "" The total minimum lo,t area requirements herein may be decreased by 300 square feet,�far each parking space that is�provided under a multiple family building. - � . . }, ..g . Off-Street Parkinq�=,Requirements - , • t. . In addition to the`applicable provisions of Section 18 of this Ordinance, the follow;iriqrminimum parkinq space and parking �ot requirements shall� apply in the R-3 District. r A minimum of two and, one-half :(2 1/2) parking spaces shall be provided for each,dwelling unit, one of which shall be enclosed. Parking 'spaces not enclosed shall hav�e*a minimum width of ten (10) feet. and twenty (20) feet in length. Al1 enclosed parking:spaces shall be d�signed with sufficient ,..a�y:, access area to allow temporary parking of vehicles on the access way without interfering�with access to other required x' . ;�{�', � parking spaces . � ` � � . � , ,, � � `��,p �' �" �_' t: ( 9 O 1) 4 9 ��,. , �:� � ' � . � ,w . � � 10. S(2) L'arking lots or other unenclosed par_king snacF�s sh�al_l be at least forty (40) feet from any public street. Parking areas shall be at least ten (10) feet from any principal i�se build- ing unless the parking area is enclosed as an �.nte ral part of such building. � . 10.5(3): The minimum width of any driveway shall be twenty- our (24) feet. The minimum distance hetween curbs of drive ays at the right-of-way line.shall be twenty (20) feet. ny aisle providing access to parallel rows of spaces shall ave a minimum width of twenty-four (24) feet. 10.5{4) No driveways shall be less than fifty (SO) feet fr�m any street intersection. 10.5(5) Minimum driveway angle from a two-way access stree shall. be sixty (60) degrees; from a one-way street it shall be not less than thirty (:30) degrees. 10.5(6) All parking areas and driveways shall be surfacPd nd curbPd with either cement, bituminous surfacing or compar. ble material to provide a hard all-weather surface �nd to delineate the edges of all parking areas and drive ays. Bumper stops of similar material shall be provided for each parking space. 10.5(7) Parking areas which ser_ve buildings housing three 3) or more dwelling units which are contiguous to or across a street from single or two f.amily units shall be screened ith a four (4) foot wall of masonry or wood. Such wall �hall be at least eight-five (85) percent opaqiie. 10.6 Architectural Controls Any buildings which will contain dwelling units fo more families in the R-3 District shall be constru in conformance to building and site plans certifie registered architect. ThP site plan may be prepar professional site planner but a registered archite certify that he has personally reviewed the site a the proposed buildings in accordance with the site terrain and neighboring conditions. No building p be issued when these conditions are applicable unt appropriate certif.icates and plans shall be submit indicate the�following: two or ted only by a . d by a t must d designed plan, the rmit wil.l 1 ed to 10.6(1) Complete details of the proposed site development, including location of bui.ldings, driveways, parking spaces, imensions of the lot, lot a.rea and yard dimensions. 10.6(2) Complete landsca�ing�plans including species and s: trees and shrubs proposed. A bond in an amount no� exceed one and one-half (li) times the cost of lanc and screening shall be required to guarantee the p: thereof as set for.th in said plans. (401) 50 z� of to scaping acement 10.6{3} Complete plans far proposed sidewalks to service parking, . recreation-and service areas within the proposed development. 10. 6(4) - Complete��lans for storm water:`c�rainaae system suffi.cien�. .� to drain and dispose of all�:;surface water accumulatians � � � within the area. - ' � .. 1Q.6t5) 10.6(6) 1Q.7 10.7 {1) 10.7 (2) 4 Complete struc�.ura1., el.ectrical. and mechanical plans for the proposed buildi,ngs. � , Complete plans and specificatians for exteriar wa11 finishes proposed for all principal and accessory bui2dirtgs. Structural, Electrical and Mechana.cai Requiremen�s In �addition to other applicable contrals and regul.ations specified in tha.s Ordinance and the building code of the City, all principal use buildings in the R-3 District shall con- form ta the following requi.rements: All mechanical and electrical systems shall be designed and cer�ified by a registered engineer. Plans for any multiple family dwelling of more than two floars shal]. have a st.ructural sys�em designed and certified by a registered structural engineer. 10.7(3} Mul�iple family buildings with dwelling units on mare than ; three (3) floors shall be of Type I or Type II constructio. , as defined i.n the I.atest edition of the ��a.nnesota State Building Code. I 1p.7{4} AI1 multiple dwej.lings shall be designed and constriictPd with windows that are ea.sil.y opened from the inside far emergency exit. 10.7{�) In new cons�ruction, no air condita.oni.ng unit shall pratrude from any ex�.erior wall unless it is designed to appear as an inteqral part a� such wall. 1Q.7{6a All,living space shall be above the average grade of the structure. 10.7{?) A minimum of fif ty.{50) square feet of starage space shall � be provided for each dwelling un.it within any multiole family b�zilding, exclusive of storage space narmal.ly pro- vi.ded within each dwelling unit. There shail be no exterior storage of debris ox garbage and no open-air laundry drying shall be permi��ed. 10.7{8} �tarage of f2ammable materials shal.l not be allowed in any structure cantaining living quarters unle�s stored in a fireproof rt�om or contazner. (401) Sl 10.7 (9) In all buildinqs housinq two�or more dwelling units followinq requirements relating to acoustical contr shall �apply: ' the �ls 10.7(9)a All doors providinq access to individual dwelling u its shall be not less than one and three quarters (1 3/ ) inch solid core and equipped with gaskets or closing pla es. 10.7(9)b All plumbinq servinq each unit shall be separated f om other units by a room, closet, corridor or sound barrier nd shall be so const�ructed so as to have a loss in sou d transmission of not less than fifty (50) decibels. 10.7(9)c Party partitions and floor systems shall be of a ty sufficient to accomplish a loss in sound transmissi less than fifty (50) decibels determined by averagi loss of frequencies of 125, 250, 350, 500, 700, 100 and 4000 cycles. Corridor partitions shall be capa accomplishinq a loss in sound transmission of not 1 forty-five (45) decibels similarly determined. 10.7(10) Al1 multiple dwelling buildings shall be designed a constructed to have the equivalent of a front on ea exterior surface. All accessory or ancillary build includinq qaraqes shall be desiqned and constructed facing materials of the same quality as those used principal use building. , (40�) 52 n of not g the , 2000, le of ss than �d :h �ngs with Ln the . , , . � , i . i�..,- Nt , i � � � ;��i�1...�._t � !�� I `r �' _ i , � �.��.��---_ _-__- : % .�.-� , �1 ' � ! � • aIARIC AV Nt, 4 _ �' ^� � ` �� :1 i�' �+1 , I' � aO� 1.f • 1 � -._.. � � •� ,� .•t + � a` � , , ' � `~� �' � • �w.� � �.�f i i .,__ • k � �� /; � � 1 _ � '�. � ti :. , � i 1 '_ ;ci k ` 1• • • u �� .�r � - � , � . ...,,. _ , . o ,__ ., - , � . � . "� ,1111 � y' � � � ��777 ,z -- •�� ` / � +//'I r � � �' . �--� �t ° �/ � 1 � � Jj ry. 4.. ' * • � �� ,u �ylf � .. � �y — • w[waolll Il.twturu.r : � ` � �� i •J/ � e "y Kwo� in»�K� �i uu .�(/ _ , � • �. � � ��, � � - , • � � ' w /� --�--�-• - • -- i �. � s � ' . 1 n c+�cu / ti� .__.. _._.' 1 � '- � ' � / r' / �� . ,.. �)� 1� , � • , J/ ' , \\ • � , , I . : \�� .r.o«c. �. CtYK � � � . } � ' �•` � / • � �� ` tiMS� �. • � � � r j ,, s�TE � �, , � / ` � • . • 1 • ` • i .��i. --. '+ ;-�-�.- , j� �" :�+.' , . ' � � � ' 'a'` � �;1.i . j , ' , � l�Jl. � : . - • . _ - - ' . . �,.; " � �„ � � "�`�' � Y j'�- � �.. /� :�� - � . i � =�'�: � .._......... � r ` . •�� ' — ��. �..+ _ =--=J. �: � _: �_.� `.�.____L�� c-�._-, _� • �. — � c--_ -_.-._ _ _-__:� �. . _ •,�� _ _ .__- . �M` "'! �I-----'.'_"_ � . ..} -------1 � _.._.� y�,-r-�-• - H i G W A Y 5 �'=z� i ," ■ �. ;4i 4;,�, ;� � �r , y� ; � :� ,�,.» _ � �� ,�lyEl11,h�;� � � , i . .�;� • j f 1,/ 1 _. -- �--- , z � _z.:i' ,\� : .9 - ►A£NQAKOTA GOIF COt1F25E 9 COUNTRY �u�je�f !� �� • � . , � -�. • !� ~ ` �' ( PRfvAT_) f� �. � It Property��. ��. �; : ., �.t:: �;,: _ ,: � �. . �' ; � �, • , � -x _ •� � . , �;� • i ` ' ,' }�{'� � - -- - ' -t; lr;� t" ' ' i Q� H471/�'''''_'' T' ,.,,,,_ _ • "'' . 1' . �, � � • . ,.. � f � : a !' +, � � .0 • �• __ ' � i,. ._ _.� � a��• - � • � ,'(M, ' ,.�.c�? ....� ."` -�.— ��-- =.�'. : _; — 1.,%i.' �'� _ - --.,��,� -� . � � ` � \`� � 1 � ��_��•M � �� _ " . � v'-'` � . : .` r . � t�j I rr, t _� _`_7 • • ' ' ' �,�� -J '�' � :_Y, CJ H � `Y,: �----� • -- j J - _ - _ _ ; F I\,,'�� • . '4.~ : � . ti '/' j . —+ � �e�� - - t i R��/��C�,I ti N �; J �� • . • . � 'w �• � ; _ � '- _ ,�` : } ' • *, ~ ' , � - i. • • • .�? . ;,� - - . �� ,\ � M .\ , � tr l l � �fi j� � - - _ �. � • wo+n.c�r. ! V � • • � • 't i x*ar�s �o+n� � ,� .� „_, ..t 1_. i� �:ia „_ _�. - _ ' nw.n•nw � a� = - . ' �."� i !1 �M i �„--� ,�w'�f„� t' • , +�^� ; F"f « ��_ �.. � �� L ��'"e��' \v% ; r"_ :� ,�V s �+ � � - , �' v _ r � w �r e a r �'�'� 1 �� •,---+� . � � `;�` � . ( . �.; % ��':' '^ ; ,; ;� �,'' ••• '�' �;: W.x � _ r ` _ k i � : � r 1,� � ' _{ / k � ..� yrau3 , , -� � _ � _ _ ( �. 1 ' FF/ :�;�'• � _ ' ' . � . � � �it . .__ci '�'•' 7 , :>� •.•• . � I . ...._.. � � ♦ , s l ir� ' ^ ' �^-� � � ` , ,;; � ,.,.: ; � � , � � . "'"� , • i ' • , l ROCfR51 � �'� � � � •� • { � `� t11 .t�;'. , IARE � � 1 - - . .-� ' `.•.�� 1� 'i =�` P1AN � i. j � - . - ' r` . . . � � r ,. � ,,7j �s., ' � t. �• . �. .� , , l� � u 1•�r� . - , �r.� ' " ` ' _ J i ^'� � 3 ;� �' ' _ � - -�i _ - � T� f i ' )�• i .' j��(' _ _ � _ � - u� ' �L �_L ' �� _ — �Q�j S " - � .� -- -- • .� �17I -- . Si_'�` ; � ..r � �'�.. . � � . �-• �-i" � � �' �� f • I� w it�..�� t' '�.� _ - �� . �{ r � . , �l d - - - CASE NUMBER: $3-01 `' �� _ ` _ APPLICANT: Richard Parranto '� j� = -� I�CTION: Adoption of a t.ew tfaulti- t r Residential District - - - �. � � - i ------r �.!t` �� r_ "'-�`!�___-� � `=! � � � � :J � ^'' �� v! ;, �_� � � ., 'j `�� 4 ~ PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: . ,., LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 22 February 1983 83-01 Richard M. Parranto Southeasterly Corner of 110 and Lexington Avenue Adoption of New P4ulti- Zoning District Highway 1. Attached is a copy of the report prepared for last month's Plann'ng Commission meeting. �You may wish to review that text, and the a companying drawings prior to continuing with this report. 2. As requested by the Planning Commission, we have conducted resea ch relating to the broader question of multi-family residential densities (n er of units per acre) used by other communities in the Metropolitan Ar a. The results of this research indicate that in general higher densiti s than that which are currently allowed in the Mendota Heights Ordinanc are in common practice. The results of this research follows in this r port. 3. We have also included two examples of multi-family zoning distri ts from the Cities of Bloomington and Edina which are helpful illustrati ns of how higher density projects have been handled in those cities. Thes are illustrated in the attached Appendices A and B. 4. At the end of t�his report there is a discussion of the various e ements of a suggested.new zoning district, followed by a draft text of s ch a . district for your consideration. Following that is an analysis f the potential impact of the zoning district to the Parranto proposal. DISCUSSION OF R-3A ZONING DISTRICT: .: In May 1977 the Metropolitan Council and the Association of Metropo Municipalities conducted a survey of zoning ordinances from 81 metro municipalities (see Figure 1). One aspect of that survey was the r for high density multiple residential zoning districts in the surve municipalities. The range of maximum permitted density varied grea the communities surveyed. Central cities such as Minneapolis permi as great as 145 units per acre, while outlying communities limit th density zones from five to ten units per acre. The following table the range of permitted densities found among the communities survey tan litan ts y among densities r highest llustrates ;,-�:;F:3P�.� ., ::�„: �� {� ,' 'k i�> +. � �.. t i� Y S f! i4�t� �'�5:�''i i��i .�, r c� � ri. . �� r�4 � 1,t�,� t ��. t; I , 1 . F� t ..; ,! l'.,� j. ,,° ie ' �- ��. .. �, � 1 l .� > y,•i t.. � ,� ✓ L` 1 ' � r a �tY i ,: . ..�. ; r�T r t � � - • 1 t Y Zr �' { �' r• ti * „r�i J i ��.�+rh t �� c �. �:� � 5 � s. .. fa �� s:'t ! �lff C�� r,F �� i= j i.� � y��'+�' �? J!'a�.c�yt! ?'`'+r�� a�� yi3a '.�i�` � ��C,d, r �,��'✓ �tY �r�i ♦ j -,�� s h;��'71 '"9 ..x � ,i `�� '� S �1� t�:*,t.! titi"..i�� . : ` .,i �: �� : �: 4 ' 7 � i .f x � ' ;,� � .0 � �� . 3 ,.� � Y� ,..r t y � �` � �� Zi �� 3 .�•y � ` _ ~ t > > 1�..i"r j � � •��a r 'r - �.i t �Y�'~i��i'. ,� • t , .° L.{ { W �:C �y� � �'t L y { n� i r� i� L:t � E .T.t`i ,�,� b � r�� 4 �. „ ` 6r��t 7 • i�Y} 1 A r �.�] F a��l.�. y��'{ .� !, a�� Y d�- i ..� '^� �:�;. � f �oi" Z � r� �'7r,4 tif} lt�� :J �.. . } � tc .1 � ��3w �� 'l � �� t 1 � hPi t� a�.� SL. jy �t�'. .� �� n � 7 �i� ��i7� �yC'i� �:��suv:. a._j !.f �� {�� y � r�'�li�y � , i�� t)�} �», v, � . �•,. � J • r ,. � • � tr ., ., �,,. � i ��'E,.��a �y�v ,t '� 4•t �3 C :; f r ,J,a� �l 3�rc'`,' �'t .�i �r,' � �Y�:yi� ' �� f" �iti:i { n Y�.�v j'�� t � S ti � -%% J . a� � f i� t1.� (�y 4. �� 1/ 4 � :� 1 l �� r ii A� 3��Ci ` 4 i.. jY .. �` , f�;..: .�ir L+' ;��i��14 . � r i ��' i �lti ,r �; til� # j�i ��7k� iH� � S. s � � .._ n i A�, ��s �'f} . .." � t s> .— �5 � i • j . : ^. r� y` -"�, � �� li �„ pI� , r �� K s� t��`� q' 1 . i � Li�'4�A�., 'F,� �. y � . � rr a �. f � 2• , i� ! � !} �, t t � „� . t. � ;y `��; ��::2��'c .r btAl i�.f� iL`a . :t.i r � t ;rr �...� �.�a�:• �oti.! �1 r. .t v � ' � � �� . .i i ��: � ti� t t . . � , s �. F,f' r. ' t f� k � r � ? � .ii '' � i ,- t' r 1�t. �. �Y�.'�S^if.. , ,�'��„+1 .�,�; ,t i � 1 Il�, 1I f1 �:7! �' � . f • 4 J � �� 1 Y, �� f .� � i� I l. . ,.. 1 1 l � :2 r.. �.. 1 � < / , �i Y : . S ti'l�d. �� 't \, i! Y a � 3 2�', h°. o l,i s � � � � ��;J � � `, �i . �it-'` c ��r �, r' ' '� � rr � i i* •� , � �< �`.�=i �'•?%i:r�j �d � .�:k j 5 t., i � t .'� �Y�j .. �' .t ✓ii-, � ` �'.�. yl � �� fi t� iA1i1 �3'.`t .M� �� _ � 'Et`� �- ` � s T�N� ty 11�' r . F'i. � � 5 -1t � �� S r .}- � �� v r' «.{ ic : 'tt y .�y/ 6�!`�, � Z�' �t ; f . 'i r s.�. +S ��.�'. ��* v n i, � �-Y.l� t:. � t� t � `+y� r `„ �t (� :h iN� n, ' . �s 4 i ,+' . : � t ' S 1 ` r , r `'' i�r , �y �, ��S �r,., �s J:� '� �� ( �{ i� p�-ir+SF � ��f �J- SV: +.� � st r,`�'�' �•r �. :t�.• �i. E � 7� . f� �� , ^� {J` t,�,�.t��si��'�i'o: _ ,�. t' j}r £��f�^!s i� .:i .�.,�=::� CASE NUMBER: APPLI CANI' : DATE: 83-01 Richard M. Parranto 22 February 1983 P�IAXIM(lM DENSITY FOR MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING 10 units/acre 15 units/acre 20 units/acre 30 units/acre 40 units/acre SO units/acre 145 units/acre Variable* No multi-family in community NUMBER OF COMMUNITZES 6 8 21 16 4 4 5 PERCENTI 7.4� 9.9� 25.9� 19.8� 4.9� 4.9� 6.2� 12 14.8$ 5 6.2� TOTAL 81 100.0� * Many of these communities gave the density figure listed in its Zoning Profile but also indicated that densities could be higher due to the size of the development or other factors. Due to the variety of inethods used in determining maximum densities it is sometime difficult to convert the figures to numbers which are It appears, however, that the average density of communities surved units per acre. Page 2 permitted, comparable. is 'near 20 Figure 2 illustrates the maximum units permitted by community. The map shows clearly that communities closer to the Twin Cities Central Business Dis'tricts generally permit higher densities than outlying communities. Prox' ity to employment and service centers is a key element in determining whic areas are most suitable for high density residential development. Other fact rs such as sewer capacity and transportation systems also affect the viabil'ty of potential developments. As Figure 2 also indicates, all communitie adjacent to Mendota Heights with the exception of Sunfish Lake permit densit'es greater than Mendota Heights. City of Saint Paul City of Inver Grove Heights City of Eagan , City of West Saint Paul City of Mendota Heights ("R-3" District) 73.0 units/acre 43.5 units/acre 23.0 units/acre 14.5 units/acre 10.0 units/acre Figure 2 MULTI-FAMI LY, MAXIMUM UNtTS PER ACRE 5 - i 2'h � �`t!Z' LU � 21 - 31 � 36 ar mare r� ,� :..»�,� �� .�,��._ � _ _._. � � ( uNwpOb � � [�il �[TN[l � tlVaNS i Qan(:POVC ��,_�� ( � �3 i � �aM/(T H�SS�H D�YTOM CM• i� G�l[MIIIID CO�CO��M OLrt4�0 HENN � ❑40�(TTO 1 tiipCt[XbtXt�� Y[DIMA IY�IIi II�IF � � �� _ { 1 f AIIIITOwF .I � kOitiwOOG ' waTERTOwtt r I o«�► ��[:�..S er�� ! ?ICt( (.{�RiNT t _— � I I ' ' 9 C�wOfN ` wAtONi• 9 l+KE70«H � A�COMI� ( CARV'ER CO. i--- �--------�------ � � � TOfUNG ( CM�511� AML�IG� FOkn04D� ( � � CalYt ' COLOGM1� DAMLGNEN � V�4hG •�ER�U I 9ENtON ' L«_�.� _ ( _��_ � _.— r �� LOV^SVILI,E ILtM0U1N � • M111NiTOMK� !rN�v[N � [�CM �lAl�tL �. ,��--- -- - CO. CORUMBUS MaML�KL ` �i � � N[W SC�+NUta +i �� (— � � r. ��,y'� UNOI�RCF r��u .;��}�� ^��::�:{• � �C[Xi[�Yi[t[ � r�4�� M(i � MaY �� $?Ef :�"�� Huco a�' � � �[ky�. rb f:�� CIRCLI IIM[t WASHIMGT4H CO. OY�iiNOf[YI[Y � �1�I��— 27 (�• (YK• woaiN � � Si¢twat[a � q�R� YNIT �" i _1 491HT 1 1 I. .;' • :. � ... •'�: :� r�. `: 0.RlL tAIkLT ._ �� ,..:k�.+2+r^''r, � �,ii`n z: , ` .. . .. 4 t` • ��,�i�': 3 t.� "'+ . . �,ti;ti •� �y�1' • i �. � � ' r',� ��'�,�i`'' � 1 'y H'?y � g:1� � G� ' f��} f i� I�� t.7��{ f {.,' «y�4± �''7. � �y r,�.t. �'.,'� .� ;�- ��;��` � �i..t� I r� •�� ' • , u�L� ��,�w:r.,'� ''!�ix�t�'i�1�C�3'��y/ - '��i,"i1Sl:i�.M.A.� 0 1 . .' . . _ ,�: ..._ ..._ . _. OA �_ � � i S+H:R�Nt+5G0 ' �".� �y�V � M�NCOCM f ( � ( ( � YERMIII�ON � 'R�vftiMa� v.��_-.�,,.,.� �SAf<OCREEIt ' SPRIHCtAKE ' CREO�F EMPIRC ' ❑ � NAqSH�N ' � • i ' plvEp Y[IMrIL410M r SC07T CO. I TOM I � � ST.I+WRENCE� JOt6Ak + I ' ' ' _� � �..� �.�__��_.�_.�.��__.._ � +cu� nae«c � V ` � `! �' I �( ( � - •• ' 1 N(W M�RKEi � i t � ON[� TIII[/ XA ON ( Bl•KELEY � BC4lF rtuN[ I MEIEN� �CEU+N lAK( i I EUREK� ' C�STLE ROCK i M�� . I � Mtw x4+KCT � ( { I � I ! � NAMVTON , OOUGL�S +f � M! �l�GY(! I lK0 t t: � i I I ---�.��4�.._�..��...��1..��...�.1�.��..1i�----�----�---�—q.Noa�wn+ u.76 1 1 ( +� arM � i � MK£5 5 1� 35 20 IS GNFENV�IC �W�TCRipjRD � ' �../�� $C10T � (�' ��.i�� 1 1t�IMG t��R 9 VICT0�1� 17 I�LCOM NfIGNTI 3! GIY ��K( 2 OiOKO (O R6��i�fOti[ 16 M[MDOiA 7G �tetNn000 J MIIIN(TOMRA �[�CM II 11�IML L�I{l ��IIR IY lllVp�ll ii wH�TE tlE•a 4 TOwKi �AT �1 Y f GOVt i0 GRET CtPUO 2� fait4eT ! llCl/llp■ �� MILlTO/ il IAXD/�ll Y9 Mrllll�Ml[ 6 G�i(X�000 {4 COIYr�i; M[ttNTt Il D[ItMOOb XY OaR tiRF M(�GNT3 7 woouUeo ts R•�rNOMr' 7.1 ne� 1niMc1 31 ��RLL�NO �NOY[t � M(OlSlql L�R[ �6 4�VPfiO4t( 7� M3.NiOtt[Dt a7 �i M4fT'i �OtM7 � '""ax� County Boundary o:oxa �unicipai Boundary � CASE NUMBER: 83-01 APPLICI�NT: Richard M. Farranto DATE: 22 February 1963 A list af 18 ather metrapolitan canununities having densities greaf units per acre i.s also included for yaur review. The name of the farmula for calculating minimum lot size, and maximum permitted d� included. Since some communi�ies allaw bonus density when speciaJ are met, we have noted which communities offer bonuses. Pzoposed R-3A Zoning Dis�rict Based on our research and experience with high densi.ty residential we have prepared a ciraft ordinance for the Planning Cammissian and Council's review. This draft ordinance includes pravisians which clensities greater than presently allowed under the existing R-3 Di proposed R-3A Zoning Dis�rict is patterned similar ta the R-3 Dis� the base densities aze madified by density deductions anc3 addition upan specific aspects of the individual proposal. Yard requiremen architectural controls, and structur�l, electrical, and mechanical of the R-3A Dis�rict are the same as•those presently requi.red in t District. The follawing is a sumnnary of the additional ar diEfere mar,ts of the proposed R-3A District. Page 3 , :r than 20 :ity, the lsity is conditions developments City ould allow trict. The ict in that based s, requirements e R- 3 t require- Permitted Uses. The new R-3A District is intended for project with 32 or more units and more than three staries in height. Proje ts af �aller size should be developed under the existing R-3 Di.stri t. Permitted Accessory Uses. In addi�ion to the normal accessory uses such as parkz.ng, driveways, I.oading, etc. we have added limite commerca.al uses to be allawed at the first £loor level. The s ope and layout of such uses wou2d be contralled by the Planned Unit De elapznent pracess which will be required in every case. It is conceivab e that � such a comba.nation of 2imited commercial. and multi-family resi ential �' could be adaptable ta possible sites in the "Downtown Mendota eights"� area {zntersectian oE Trunk Highway 110 and 149). Lot Area. The praposed minimum lot size iF 80,000 square feet Prajects of a smaller size are mare sui.table in tha Ft-3 District. The armula for determining required lot area'is based upon 2,500 square f et per unit, �. approximately i?.5 un5.ts per acre. This base density is furth r madifi�d by the follawing: 1. Underground Parking. Parking underground improves sit� efficiency. A bonus of 300 square feet per undergroun< stall is proposed. This is similar ta the R-3 Districi 2. Building Height. As buildings became taller, building site coverage decreases and site efficiency improves. An allowance af 2Q0 square feet per unit is provided for all units ai�ove the fourth floor.� r CASE NUMBER: $3-Ol APPLICANT: Richard M. Parranta DATE: 22 February 1983 Page 4. 3, Building Caverage. If building coverage is significantly r�duced (ta 10� or less}, a bonus oi 250 square Peat per unit is propased. 4. Number af Bedroams. For each bedroom per unit mare than two, an additional 500 square feet per unit a.s proposed. As an example, if a ten story structure with �en units per floor was praposed and one underground parking space per unit were provided and the building coverage was less than 10�, a maximum density of 24 units per acre could be permitted under the Ordinance. Useable Lot Area Amendment. While ma.n5.mum lot size tioes directly relate to the amaunt af green space on a praposed lot, it does not necessarily mean that the space is both useable ar accessible by residents as outdoor recreata.on space. This amendment would assure that a rninimum of useable au�door space would be provided. Special Requiremen�s. Due to ti�e traffic generated by high density deveZopments, this provision assures that gaad and safe access will be pravi.ded by any proposed future projects. Parki.ng Requir�nents. The total required parking spaces propased is similar to �he R-3 Distarict. The only difference is that in the R-3A District, one unc3erground parking space per unit will be required, This greatly discourages the use of garages to fulfil.l parking requirements. 'Thi.s also further reduces buii.ding site coverage and ensures that more green space will be provided. a ANAL`1SIS 4F THE PROPC?SED R-3A DISTRICT AS IT WOULD AFFECT THE PROPO�AL OF RICHARD PARFIP,NTO: 1. As the Planning Commission wi11 recall on 25 January 1983, Richard Parranta requested that the Cammission consider a new zoning ciistrict to permit higher residential density requirements. The fallowing is an analysis �: showing haw the clenszty"praposed by Mr. Parranta's praposal wauld be affected by the R-3A District. CASE NUMBER: 83-01 APPLICANT: Richard M. Parranto AATE: 22 February 1983 NUMBER OF UNITS FLOOR NUMBER PROPOSED 1 13 2 18 3 18 4 18 5 9 • 6 4 TOTAL UNITS: 80 TOTAL PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE = 18� 2. Based upon 80 proposed units, the base=required lot area is 200, feet. Additions and deductions to this base are as follows: - 80 underground parking spaces at 300 square feet per parking space = 24,000 squaz - 13 units above four stories at 200 I square feet per unit = 2,600 squax - No three bedroom units proposed = ' 0 squar - Building coverage in excess of 10� = 0 squar - TOTAL NET DEDUCTIONS = 26,600 squaz - TOTAL REQUIRED LOT AREA (200,000 s.f. - 26,600 s.f.�) = 173,400 squaz - TOTAL IAT AREA PROPOSED = 190,342 squaz Therefore, the proposed submission by Mr. Parranto would fulfi: density requirements of the proposed R-3A District. Page 5 000 square feet e feet e feet e feet e feet e feet e feet . the l t�iannin�; ��uunisslon Minu�e5, t•ebruary LL, tyt53 i�u};� ruur As noted in staEf reports, the 1lenrict�s o a large lot tiiat has enough area buC not enough frontage to be legally split without a variance. A 10 foot variance to the north lot��oulc be required. � No one was present for the public hearing discussion Morson moved, seconded by Butle public hearing at 9:55 P.M, recommending a subdivision, and granting a 10 foot varia lot, as well as requiring a SO foot right from the centerline of Lexington Avenue. nd after a brief , to close the oval of the to the north r-way dedication otinQ: all aves. CASE ��83-07, KEGLER, Mr. and Mrs. Leo Kegler, owners of Lot 4, 1 1, Sunview Hills, VARIANCE 1880 Hunter Lane, were present to request pproval of a 30 foot frontyard setback variance to constru t a home 30 feet from the front property line. Other homes in this area are setback much greater than the required 30 eet but this particular lot has a drainage easement and a wetlands located on the rear of the lot. . After a brief discussion, to reCommend approval of a Voting: all ayes. Stefani moved �foot front ; CASE ��83-08, VAN, Mr. Scott Van, 1885 Hunter Lane, was pres CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT request to place fill on Lot 3, B1 4, Sunv FOR FILL After a brief discussion over the matter o � being needed, especially in the driveway a seconded by Frank, to set a public hearing RECESS conded by Morson, .rd setback.varian nt to explain his ew Hills. a corrected topo ea, Blesener moved, for March 22nd, to consider a conditional use ermit for fill on Lot 3, Bl 4, Sunview Hills. Voting: all ayes. Chairperson Kruse called for a recess at meeting reconvened at 10:20 P.M. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL At the January 25th Planning Commission me ZONING DISTRICT Parranto was present to request an amendme ordinance by requesting creation of a new to allow his proposed project to be constr and Lexington. In response to commission Dahlgren had pre.pared a proposed new R-3A addressing this concern. The new district minimum of 80,000 square feet and would be projects with 32 or more units and more th height. :15 P.M. The ting, Richard t to the zoning �ning district cted at TH 110 irection, Planner �ning District aould contain a intended for 1 three stories in The Commission members discussed several as ects of the new zoning district with member Stefani noting hat he would not like to see higher density in Mendota Heigh s, particularly at TH 110 and Lexington. Member Butler wan ed Council opinion on the new district and also wanted public 'nput on the matter Chairperson Kruse noted that he is not in f vor of establishin; a new zoning disCrict Eor R-3A. The other o�nission members suggested that perhaps Mr. Kruse could cont ct other members of the City Council to get their opinion of the zoning distric 131esener noted that she felt comfortable wi h the district and would like to s�e it pursued Eurther. � � ,, .� Planning Commission P1inutes, February 22, 1983 Page Five � � After furtl�er discussion, Frank moved, seconded by Stefani; to not consider an R-3A Zoning District Eor Mendota Heights ' at ttlis time. Voting: 4 ayes, 2 nays, Blesener and Mor�on. VERBAL REVIEW A verbal review of the application by Bill Strub for a variance that was granted at the February lst Council meeting was given. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Commission, Butler moved, seconded by Morson, that the meeting be adjourned. VotinQ: all aves. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:05 o'clock P.M. Public Works Director Danielson noted that there may be an additional public hearing on March 22, regarding a simple subdivision on Callahan Place whicfi may have some• neighborhood opposition to it. � � M r �:ETY U� fViEl�l7��'r� HEiGNTS j��l��i I��bru:iry 24 ' R t {} 75(3 ;�iouti� f'i3z�3 (?ttve � FN.E NO. i � PJiE:NQOTA i-tE'sGHTS. t:�l(titdESOTA 55120 , ��( ` ' �� ATTHNTION: ? III ; --- ' F'hcane 4�2-I8a0 � j M > � S ' S . A G . E � P t � Y � �ir. Richard Paz'r�ata Q URGENT! ❑ SO4M AS P08818LE ❑ NO REPtY NEEOED Czce ��83--07_, . enc3meuC to Zoning; 4rdinanc � Transmitted {or your inCoxinat.ion: City ��unci'� ��da, 2-4{zrch 1, 1383 Tneetin�; Cc�pies of a7.1 repor�:� and Pla ninp COIIlIA�.SS�.0I1 Cnmznis�ion minxxte � r.elaLa.�*� o yaur applic�t�.�n for 7.anin�; �1r�]:i_i:3;�r.e �s��:�ndn .zit. . . ^', � f , �- ' � Itia�h� ee� :�4. Swunsan CiCv Cl rk c:�closures SiGNED: 6 DATE OF REPL S{GNED: SENDER: DETACH AND FII.E FOR FOLLOW-UP. ' M Pr��e No . 1794 March 1, 1983 AEteY discussian, Cau�cilma�l Losl�Uen moved ap�roval. of Che prelzminary glat as presentecl, including a 10 Eaot lot width variance an the north lot, subject ta the granCing of an additional 17 feet oE ri�ht-of-way alon� I,exinpton Avenue arid subject to receipt of the required park cantribution. Councilwoman Witt secanded the marion. r\�'�'�" Z �.tY:+r � !:A`�1: ft83-07, Mr. Leo Kegler was present to request approval of a fronC yard �;}:t,� �;�Z setbacic variance far 1$80 Hunter Lane {Lot 4, Block l, Sunview Hills). Mr. Kegler exp].ained the topagraphy of the site and stated that given the Copagraphy, he cannat place his prapas�d new residence at the same setback as ather resi.dences in the general area. He asked that he be allowed to place his house 30 feet from the front �aroperty line. Mayor Lockwaad maved approval of Che variance, as requested, granGing permission to construct a residence 30 feeC fram the front yard setback at 1$$4 Hunter Lane. Councilma� Losleben seconded the motiott. r1��., . 5 �:��:;. (J i:Atii•: //$3-pl The Council noCed that no one was present to represent the 1'AR1tANT0 " applicant with regard to the application far zoning ordinance revision. Na action was taken on the matCer. �t I�;t:t:LLANE0t3S Mayor Royal Balcke, from the City of Mendo�a, was present to respand to a J.etter relative to an extens9.on of the proposed Mendata sewer system to the St. Peter's Church site. He briefly reviewed the City af Mendota's application for HUD funding and the status of �he proposed project. He a].so welcomed the City to investigaCe the possibility o€ joining St. Feter's Church inCo the system and indicated that cooperation would be required Erom FitTi) and from the Mendota engineering f irm. There was alsa a considerable amount of discussiori over surface water drainage int�c Mendata from MendoCa Heights. ltU11,!)I1VG pERMiTS Mr. Garry Marko, representing Dak.ota County State Bank, was present ta request approval of a building permit ta remove a glass parti�ion and install a firewall and to straighten an arngle an a doar in the old City 4ffice space an �he lawer Zevel af the bank structure. The Council also acknowledged a handout memo fram the Code Enfarcemertt Officer recommending approval af the request. Councilman Losleben maved to approve the issuartce of a building permi.t to Dakata Caunty State Bank. Councilwoman Witt seconded the mation. Avt_s: j \:iys: p The Cauncil acicnowledged receipt of a mema fram the Cad� Enfo - ment Officer recommending•approval oE the issuance of a permit £or remodel.ing in the Mendota Plaza Shopping Center to accommadattr a Coast to Coast hardware facility. � Mr. Orvil J. Johnson City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 750 S. Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Dir. Johnson: ��/N C:IT�C� Jecember 5, 1983 etropolitan Council 300 etro Square Building ieven h and Robert Streets St. P�aul, Minnesota 55101 Enclosed is a copy of the staff review of the City of Mendota Heights' revenue bond plan to be considered by tne Metropolitan and Community L Committee at 1:00 p.m. on Thursday, December 8. The full Metropolitan will also consider this review at its 4:00 p.m. meeting that same day. (612) 29a ;6359 1: r'� � .'��' � � g�"�� ! �,•r„rt housing avelopment Council Though your attendance at the meeting is not mandatory, it may be help�ul if there are questions by Council members for which I don't have answers. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si ce 1 , uy eterson Housing Planner Enc. An Equal Opportunity Employer MEMORANDUM � FROM: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Suite 300 Metro Square Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 December 5,� Metropolitan and Community Development Committee Guy Peterson SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS" HOUSING REVENUE BOND PLAN • REFERRAL FILE N0. 11740-1 • COUNCIL DISTRICT N0. 15 I. AUTHORITY TO REVIEW The Council has received an amendment to the City of Mendota Hei� housing revenue bond plan initially reviewed by the Council in DE 1982. The Council is required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter �46� review and camment on such plans and plan amendments for their ec with loc�l and regional housing policies and needs. The Council this �plan amendment on November 30 and thus the 45-day review pe� no� expire until January 14, 198�• However, the city has asked 1 Council to review this bond plan amendment at its first meeting a December so that is may seek MHFA approval of the bond program i� II. BOND PROGRAM SUMNIARY This amendment to Mendota Heights' housing bond plan sets forth For Multifamily Housing Development" which authorizes the city t housing revenue bonds the proceeds of which will be used to fund mortgage loan to finanee the acquisition and construction of the Heights Apartments. In October of this year the Council conduct review of the developer�s proposal for federal mortgage insuranc projeet. �: : +a • � � i 7,�r,, � 1983 hts' cember , C to nsistency received iod does n December. "Program issue a Lexington d an A-95 for this This bond program calls for the issuance of $11 million in housi g revenue bonds to provide $10.2 million for the construction of a 225 uni� apartment projeet at the southeast corner of Lexington Avenue an Wagon Wheel Road. The development will include 90 one-bedroom and 135 two- bedroom Lmits in three, three-story elevator buildings on an 18- cre site. The anticipated rents upon initial occupancy will be $475 $500 for the one-bedroom units and $575-$600 for the two-bedroom i,mits. Twenty percent of the units in the development will be held for by households of low- and moderate-income, that is those with an gross incame not in exeess of 80 percent of the median income fo Metropolitan Area, for 10 years •or one-half the term of the tax- obligations, whichever is longer. Currently this incane could b $25,280. It will be the project owner's responsibility to certi City or Trustee annually that this tenant incane restriction is in order to maintain the tax-exempt status of the revenue bonds. ceupancy adjusted the xempt to the ng met It is curren�ly proposed that the bonds will be publiciy sold prior to the end of this year. Constructian�is also anticipated to begin in December with completion and oeeupaney not exgeeted, however, until early 1985. TII. ISSUES RELATIVE TO TRANSPORTAS'ION AND AVIATION PLANNING The proppsed site of this development borders the Interstate 35E cooridor and development plans do include earth bercning to reduce noise levels. Additional guidanee on naise attenuation is available fram the Minnesata Department af Transpartatior� although state and federal policies do not provide far installation, at publie expense, af naise abatement measures for new development constructed adjacent to major transpartation facilities , The site is at least partiallp within noise exposure zones III and IV near Minneapolis-St. Pau2 International Airpart. Aircraft takeoffs are likely to result in peak hour no3se ie�eis of 70-75 decibels. Multifamily deve3.opnzents whith shared entranees are "provisianal" in these zones, aceording to the Couneil"s Guidelines for Land Use Capability with Aireraft Noise adopted in Mareh, 3983. This mear�s that the apartments shauld be construeted so that interior noise levels in living areas should not exesed an interiar sound level af 45 dBA idscibals). As was recommended to HUD by the Council when it reviewed this project's applieation for i`ederal mortage insurance in 4etober, ths eity should t�ke the fallowing measures to apprapriateiy reflect the guidelines: 1} require noise disclasure infarmatian for prospeetive tenants, and 2) require noise attenuation in the eonstruetion of these uniis to aehieve the speeified interior noise limitations. IV. CONSISTENC7C WITH LQCAL AND REGI4NAL HOUSIAIG NEEDS, GOALS AND POLICZES In Navember, 1980, the Metropolitan Council found the housing e2ement of Mendota Heights` camprehensive plan ineonsistent with the Housing Chapter of the Metropolitan Development Guide. The plan did not have polieies or numerieal goals regarding the pravision af law- and moderate-ineome housing opportunities nor did it set farth an implementation strategy by which sueh ob�eetives eou3.fl be aceanplished. In preparing a hausing revenue bond glan in late 19$2, Mendota Fieights supplemented the housing element of their comprehensive p1an with housing policies that recognixed the potential need for low- and moderate-income housing in Mendota Heights for families and the eldarly. These policies call for continued caoperation with the Dakata County HRA to provide law- and maderate-incaure housing and eonsideration for the use of federal, state and local resources to provide such housing. The bond plan�, unlike the housing element of the comprehensive plan, set forth an implementation program autlining the housing assistanee that has been and continues to be provided in Mendota Heights, as well as a deacription of bath single-family and multifamily housing revenue bond pragrams,. Mast importantly, however, it indieated the recognition that it wil.l be to the city"s "benefit and advantage to pursue the necessary revisians" ta the housing element of its canprehensive plan ta deal with these housing affordability issues. � -2- t Though a specific timetable for""such revisions was not presented, plan indicated that such changes would be appropriately made in conjunetion with other canprehensive plan revisions that are to b following resolution of the airport noise and land use compatabil planning issues. When it reviewed the Mendota Heights' bond plan December, 1982, the Council directed staff to offer assistance to officials to resolve this comprehensive plan issue and evaluate t revisions necessary in the housing element. The city decided not pursue participation in the mult�.-community bond program for whic prepared their bond plan, but did not reverse their approval of t housing bond plan. They have not, however, sought any advice fra Couneil with regard to housing element revisions ..S� ��`�',I�� ;/ Now, with the addition of this multifamily bond program to the c plan, the Council is again faced with the issue of how to reconc inconsisteney of the housing element of the city"s comprehensive regional housing policy, and its proposed effort in a bond plan affordable housing. The Council is proposing and the city indic it concurs with the following steps to resolve this issue: the bond made ty in city to the y e �t h'e q/I/ �GN d / �.i'a.°i Q y "s bond e the lan with provide es that 1. The city agrees to undertake revisions to its housing element independent of its efforts to amend its land use plan brought bout by b � recent amendments to the Aviation chapter of the Development G'de because that process may take longer than expected. 2. The city will seek the advice and consultation of Council hous ng staff in indentifying the Council"s specific concerns with the housi g element of its comprehensive plan. 3• The city's revision efforts will include adoption of f�ir shar numerical goals for affordable housing as well as an e xaminati n of local official controls to aehieve greater flexibility in zoni g density . 4. These revisions should be completed within a reasonable ti Sinee May, 1984 was the originally anticipated date for re to aviation impaets, that date still seems appropriate. The Mendota Heights' bond plan and the multifamily housing progr added to it, are consistent with both local and regional housing and _goals, and will help the city provide for some of the housin has identified. Specifically, these housing needs include the p of low- and moderate-income housing opportunities and additional cost housing for both families and the elderly. This housing bond effort is also consistent with regional housin such as Policy 81, which calls upon cities using tax-exempt fina assist residential development to�do so in a manner which helps share of the areawide need for low- and moderate-income and mode housing. Consistent with regional policy and the Couneil"s bond review guidelines, the bond plan indicates that the housing oppo afforded by the program will be affirmatively marketed to all po consumers and producers. The proposed apartment projeets will a provide diversification of housing type, and the construction of rate rental housing units, both of which are identified in the C review guidelines as primary objectives in tax-exempt financing -3- •due being �o li ci es needs it vision odest poli cy , ing to et their cost lan . unities n ti al rket- cil"s housing . The apartment project proposed by this bond plan amendment is consistent with the city"s land use plan and has received all necessary approvals for develogment by the city's planning commission and council. The project is consistent with the Council"s housing review t3uidelines and other ,! applicable policies of the Metropolitan Development Guide. Ve SUI�'II�IARY OF FINDINGS 1. This bond plan amendment includes all the information required and necessary for Metropolitan Couneil review. • 2. It identifies and describes a multifamily bond program to develop the Lexington Heights Apartments. 3• Though the Mendota Heights comprehensive plan has no policies regarding the provision of affordable housing, this bond plan sets forth policies and implementation aetivities to aceomplish�such, and includes •� indication by the city that these types of revisions to its comprehensive plan are necessary and forthcoming. 4. The bond plan amendment"s multifamily development program will help the City aehieve a portion oP its ten-year fair share law- and moderate- income and new modest cost housing responsibilities. VI. RECO@R�SENDATIONS 1a That given Mendota Heights" recognition that changes are necessary in f, the housing element of its comprehensive plan and its commitment to proceed with such revisions, this bond plan amendment, as currently su�bmitted, is consistent with the Council"s Housing Bond Plan Review Guidelines. 2. That housing staff be directed to off er assistance to the City of Mendota Heights in its efforts to revise the housing element of its comprehensive plan to address the issue of fair share housing responsibilities and housing affordability consistent with regional housing policyo 3• That the city take measures to insure that prospective tenants receive a diselosure of noise anticipated from aircraft overflights, and the specified interior noise limitation standards be achieved. LS8232 -4- �, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS December l, 1983 T0: City Council FROM: Edward I'. Kishel City Engineer SUBJECT : Raadway Width Variance Council is aware that as part of the construction of F,A.I. 49 , east o£ F.A.I. 35E, Mn/DOT will also recanstruct TH 149, (Dadd Road) to a poi t north af Mendata Heights Raad and wzll canstruct a segment af Mendata Heigh s Raad east af TH 149, as a Service Drive, ta replace Blue Gentian ltoad, whi h will b� destroyed a.n the freeway constructian. Mn/I?4T intended to construct Mendota Heights Raad as a 34 foat wide country road. Through discussion and negotiatian, MnjDOT is now plan ing, and will receive bids in January, 1984, for a standard 44 foot wide roadw y with a cancrete curb and gutter together with a bituminous sidewalk. Mendota Heights wili have to pay for the 10 additional. feeC of roadway and the eight foot bituminous sidewalk with the use of State Aid iund . Because State Aid has established a minimum width of 46 feet f r State Aid fundin�, it is necessary to request a variance when the width dae not meet �hose standards. Staff has made the request, and has received Commi sioner Braun's approval of a variance subject to a resalution from the Counc 1 holding MnjDOT harmless fram future claims caused by the variance. Attached is a capy of the Commissioner's letter, along with a proposed resolution. Staff requests approval. of the resolution. of the t�`�NNE�Tq �n° �o n Q � � -' - � � o F,l,T 5Q OF TFP� ;� 111111(..:SC)1�.1 1.)(;�.)cli"1�C11Ct11 OI �I ('"<IIIS��O1"1�111O11 "1'r<�r�SE�c)rt��iic)►� f>�iilciin�; �t. I'<lU�, l�•`[11111C'�(�(<1 > ;155 O(fic( C�( c_:��mniissic�nc�r November 28, 1983 Mr . James. Daniels.on Mendota Heights City, Engineer 750 �outh. Plaza Drive Mendota Aeigfits, Minnesota 55120 In reply refer to: 8100 Request for Variance Dear Mr. Daniels�on: l(il2) 2�d6•3OOO Upon review of ttie validity of the City of Mendota Heights` request for a variance from S.tate Aid Rules § 1.5032 H.,l.,c., I hereby grant the variance. The variance is conditional upon receipt of a resolution b� the Mendota Heights�CitX Council tfiat indemni�ies;, saves and holds harmless the State of Minnes.ota and all its: agents: and employees of and from any and all claims, demands,, actions: or causes of actions of any nature or character arising out o� or hy reason of, in any manner, tlie reconstruction of Mendota Heights Road from Trunk. Higtiway 4�. LDodd Road) to C.S.A.H. 63 (Delaware Avenue) in any otlier manner tfian as a 46—foot wide street in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Transportation 14 MCAR § 1.5032, and further agrees to defend at their sc�le cost and expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising as a result of tki� granting of this variance. Sincerely, �i�� `'r�/d Richard P. Hraun Commiss.ioner An �?qurrl �)pporlunih� limployer ��q, � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION N0. 83- RESOLUTION HOLDING THE STATE OF MINNESOTA HARMLESS FOR GRANTING THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS A VARIANCE WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights has applied for a variancel State Aid Rules 14, MCAR § 1.5032 H., 1., c., and from WHEREAS, the Variance Committee of the M innesota Department of rans- portation has granted subject variance conditional upon receipt of a r sol- ution from the City that holds harmless the State of Minnesota for suc action; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Mendota Heights saves, and holds harmless the State of Minnesota and all its agents a of and from any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of actions soever nature or character arising out of or by reason of, in any man reconstruction of Mendota Heights Road from Trunk Highway No. 149 (Do C.S.A.H. 63 (Delaware Avenue) in any other manner than as a 46 foot w to curb street in accordance with the M innesota State Aid Constructio be found in the Rules of the Minnesota Department of Transportation 1 or arising as a result of the Commissioner's decision to grant this v .ndemnifies, . employees �f what- :r, the Road) to .e, curb Standards to MCAR � 1.5032, •iance. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this Sixth �lay of December, 1983. � ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF M ENDOTA HEIGHT By Robert G. Lockwood Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS December 1, 198� T0: City Council FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Off icer SUBJECT: Dakota County Bank Sign Permit Approval � Mr. Mark Raiche, of Leroy Signs, Inc., attended a regular schedul d consulting meeting at staff's request to discuss his application for a sign permi . Dakota County State Bank's existing sign, lo.cated at the southwes corner of the ' shopping center site, is in need of repair, and the time and temperatu e portion of the sign has been inoperable for some time. The City Hall sign, located o the same stzuct should also be replaced fo match the bank's new sign. After the City received the application, a meeting was scheduled ith City Planner, Howard Dahlgren, to make sure that all City Ordinance requirements wou d be met before issuing a permit. At the meeting with Howard, it was noted that the p esent sign was approved for its location by a Conditional Use Permit granted October , 1972. Howard stated that because the proposed total sign area will be 1 ss than originally approved all the applicant needs to do.is apply for a sign permit. Th t permit, as do all commercial and industrial permits, needs City Council approval. N xt Planner Dahlgren felt that because the new sign is so remote f�om the bank bui ding it should have a directional arrow incorporated in its desigu. Finally, P'�anner Dahl�ren offered to design a new City Hall sign f�or Council consideration. � It appears that these graphics changes recommended by staff will ot be availa�le until the night of the Council meeting, therefore, the original. propos d sign drawings will be enclosed for your review. (Sign design remains same only mess ge will change.) Staff recommends the granting of a sign permit to Le�o.y Signs, an�1 authorization to expend approximately $1400.00 to pay for the City`s portion of the newlsign. a; CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MII�I O T0: City Council December 1, 1983 FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Hughes Lot Division Lot 16, Block 1, Ivy Falls West Second Addition The attached file memo by Ed Kishel reviews the progression of ac ivities regarding the above lot division. The division was conditionally appr ved on July 7, 198�., but was never recorded by the owner because the easement prepar- ation had not occurred. We have received copies of the easements, whi h have been recorded at the County offices. The park contribution has also b en received. We recommend that the Council formally accept the easements and g final approval to the lot division. (A copy of the proposed division attached). This approval, or in reality, a confirmation of the origin will allow us to submit authorization to the County Recorder to accept property deeds. .ve 31 approval, the , , .>-� . ,%' 7 �1 t i {� L^-__••'�t..i_ `� ��t ` t ' \ � F . . �• ' . . �. _ ' 'i •�1 ' an.a. • ' � H Kl�tJ` h• . '\ 'i i � 4LT.1� . � . . . • . ... .. . - ^ - - ' • - - - � � .� -•�I -'-. -• - - -'`- �' ; - - - - - -� •` .. . .. . ......--- ._.. • � ..�. . . . ....... . ' ' \ � I f % . a ..... .... ... ..... . . .i • � � . . � • •/ I � • ...... ... .... ... ,: Y�, , � • , � ��' /�� `•, �� , o . . ..,...�. ...r.......,......_ ' .�', . / / + �. •;---: . ,; % !' .� ,�-� � ' �► �i � �� '� . : ; . .�° � R. / 't ,r� j -- - ' �' � � j � , .; . ' �� '' . / � .,+ t', /, �Y � \ ` ..`�� y� "�; . . �! /� � f � / �, / � \, � . i j' � t' � j / l� '�. r� �. ♦ `�•. \ � �_ ' ; �i . ! �' � s ��' � .,� :`� - ` `� �,—. . . . �: . . ' I. . .. . • _ ' /%• /. /� If I �� / % /� % I; / � _ ,� _ � � •' '' � � ,' / / ` � 1 -~ . : : LOT A � � , ! % � �� • �° � � ' ,,• / � /` / / %: � �• \ 1 ` ��._.'�,Yri � Nnw�/C : �' . j �• � / L YVME�f 1��t{� . � . / / � � / • . J, / -r�'• • / , / i � I / � ' �' � �, o � .._.. %Aw� t . %' � �' % l � / � / r LOT B ; I � , • ' `', u...�. �,W • �•. . . � � � ! / � . . � � % _ �� • � �'�•:;� .• �� • • `�`'I � � /' ,. ^� ' � . .� � __'__ I '� • y � � � r * ,,; . � � � . . �tq`.' /'� . ` %' • � �� . . � .. f C/� \\ ' •,' r 7' / c; ' i . /� . ; . . I .. �oT � ��': � , �: � ' • . '`•- /� . � . .' - SCA L E I "� z 0 � ' • �000 : �; `� '�,. •...,, , >��'�� 'Y;� 'r/' � '',; � t`1 ;. �' � ` • . � � . ' �°� �aTs �• • ' ��> /', '•4 • — __ TOP06Rl1PHY MAP `� � � t �,�;• /��, `'r ;: � ' - �. �� " ?'% � ��K . �: :.....�..�h..,��.. +� HucNEs CoNsr. ' � � r • �.. � �..; �i r. �;t. L► � �. � w~i � .�i� �H.... � .. . W K, /!a[ I IIy !iw I!/nr tw �.�N `/ �} � `�-.�'�"' i...r "�"�� D�c�r� C�a.l Mirria�T,1 • •'I • , " � f N ��ru� �11 Mwallr " �' `' • ' 1; ,' �.,�.,. .... � _..,�, .� _ ..�. y � . . �r � +�r• ~ , w ! �� rwr�.�r.". W rw �.w.�i. � ^ � /� ,j'` � � •�t ,, ��.�1•;t• /Lu� i%.�Q �� /��,� ,• ,��' ��^+, �. w_ JP�S�. �c.� l�{J.i/ A[ i� Sif1 YO�CI WMuOt t UWG K , . �' .f. �� / . �,., �.�-� , . . �;, :.�„�.;,�;. .- �, ; • . .,. P�rrvit. � sHowr,a unrrEs • ...._,.. _ �, ' (�M IIW R L�}v6T) i10 BCB�B � .. ��. t, Ls•= [j:; ��tt S e ti�q i F ��ii Lt�: t�(� � }•�i t!a � 1 ; t i SI . � • �, � � �_ . �c.-� � � �� 1JoJ � ��2 21 � t � �� ; " �.,� �JI l � . r� �o . � T , � �-�.,� r �� - � � 1 v �a �,�,5 tc� �� r � `�. � J�� . �I � t, W-� M��. � o�- `�I--� 1�. i �� s► o� o F �•o � 1(� �I.QcJ�'� � � 1 � C..I�S UV �` Z� � D p I TZb� � I � ��-�. r�� ►�', � t-� r Z �- L�- L�� c� )� �. r. o v P� o v�� - s � o G 6� N-t � I��7 �L. t�� x� G A I� C� v 1� c. � o � . I � .rj'b�"� cT7'� , v5 m� .�4-� 2a aS�p l�D 1 �� -n� � v� �� - �- I�, Ir ��-�,5 ;�' .��-.- � ` r �'fi-�-1-��j iY(� � flf�"1 D� o� �"�- _ i'1-D 1-'� i �j I � � 1 �`�1 C�,�-c��- c�-�S -, ----'P`�v � �,v �-�� l�--f�-- �Z--+ cz _ �r.�--- ---------1 � � �- p -�--�-�.. � ��r� ��-�- u� � i � �--v�. �-o � I �L D � o � i� � ��-f�� I'�-P fi-a� ('� �� v � �_ ��. � � `t (� O ►-� �' j � �=� ► G�I, h"�-L.. 2 ��D I � � !� y , l.,p -�- � (J l�l -� . _ � --�- \ �� '��--- I � �'� � � Ay /a,� � �� M1- �..:�;k� tJ�--r'L.. ��.,� � �.--�� ...� �--�. ��S' o� c�� . �'N�9 �- . ��i � 1� c� � � A-r..L �� '�t� . 't11 �r�� \ �I � "'S , W 1 �:��-f� �� '� � ,v �p ��1�--a � 1��-�--b. .� . � S,� `�� -r- �, � � � _ . I� �— . _-- - . �-t �o.�- � T ►� � � �-e.-�� . o r� -,� � a� � ) , . � �-� ;l� � `� � - �vv� p ��r�-t�t-ft�' r'Z. �.1�-� �rJ�► � � �I �a--�.�� . . m u �� ~----r' '��%�� , J ��.. ��-c-h �-� j� ��rz.. �- Is.�� -�--- . � �-�-r� � l� n ��- ��- - ' . v rL � r��;� �5 , ��— - �-�``�' � ��o �z�-v � �-� �- r !� ��c� s .��- � �.-,�-- { , � ` t�sY�� (Z��'c.�Y�-� �-~� � � �--5 � 5 � � , � d N4 1�'� 1�--�- � t� � �- � � j � � ('� - �� J'��r�D � 'C t � � -�-�� -� �� ,��. r��T.�--,� �� -�-�. � � , � r�..,.. �-�.. � � a ,� 1 �- �� .- U� _ �� , ' � p p �, � �� l�� a � �� -�..o ��-�- �,,�,� , . . . . � - - M n. .1,.,, ,� r��=�5 . �-- �� -�''� ��-� 5 ._� �' C � � v Y'�-L-�r`� 1�c-ca 4'� "�� '11�il�- t�._. � ''�— � �v-1J1�'- ��'�5 . �� - ��; i�`e--� n-t� ` � :W t�-C� t ►�'D ! , - G-�tT'�'� �-� �� u c. a-�--5 � - �-�- � r��-�. rp � � � c� n-� �f �— C.� r�-r<�-�—r� �� ,.�,•�,�,�. � , -- _ ._ - �- -. �- __. _ o�.,t�n� = u � _ 1�_� _ - --- � F�t�-fi-� � - � � i - `� `� ��c��-� � . �� i��--� �--� z.�...-� �-� c� � � c��-.- -�-�--�- � ��.- ��.�� `1��...v�-�'� �'�'1 �'C� � f�-�: !�� ('i-(� �v� �...,t,�.�-c 1,.,,, �s .. �� i � � k�" �J �-�2.�r , `, �t�'h'� t� 4� c.t� j�4--k-S ��-tg-�..1�-*3 �'"� 1 �4G.��i+� ��'�17� � U �� 3r-�c'�(" ��-�`-Q-?" r!�-�.7� . � _ (� � ti... �, �2,� c��--� �w , -� t� ,� ,� rz-� ,�...��'�..�- � . . �,,U �c�--. �-�� Ca�. � �...f �, . ,..-. , �' ��-�.- n.��-u�., �- , r��SU� � �x � � �j �� o � � �� - - - - - - � � . � �-� �-t.,.. ��-�.._ _ �-�-.o� .___._..1-�-� �. �__�-�--c�._ � """�j � ��'� , , � � � �� . �D �'►�-- "�.� �— �..c� � . ,%�c� M � � . , �� . �r�.�� c�� . ,..�.__-----� 0 1 t CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION N0. 83- RESOLUTION CORRECTING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 18, 1983 MEETING WHEREAS, at its regular Council meeting held on October 18, 1983 the City Council adopted a resolution ordering sanitary sewer, water and storm ewer improvements for the Kingsley Estates Planned Unit Development and awa ding the contract for said improvements; and WHEREAS, the minutes of said meeting incorrectly stated the titl of said resolution as "RESOI.UTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CON TRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWERS, WATERMAINS AND STORM SEWER IMPRO VEMENTS TO SERVE KING LEY ESTATES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (IMPROVFM ENT N0. 83, PROJECT NO 5)"; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to correct and clarify said mi�utes of its October 18, 19E3 meeting as hereinabove set forth. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the C}.ty of Mendota Heights, M innesota, as follows; I 1. That the minutes of the October 18, 1983 Council meeting be nd the same are hereby corrected and amended so that the title of Resol tion No. 83-93 shall read as follows : "RESOLUTION ORDERING LMPROVF�IENTS AN ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER, WA ER, STORM SEWER IMPROVIIrIENTS TO SERVE KINGSLEY ESTATES PLANNED UNIT DE LOPMENT (LMPROVEMENT N0. 83, PROJECT N0. 5)". Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this �ith day of December, 1983. � ATTEST : Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk � CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGH S By Robert G. Lockwood Mayor