Loading...
1983-04-05l. Call ta Order. 2. Rol1 Ca11. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGH'SS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA April S, 19$3 7:30 P,M. 3. Approval o£ Minutes, March 15, 1983. 4. Cansent Calendar: rQ,�,,,.:�C., a. Acknowledgement of Code Enforcement monthly r�por� for Marc . b. Acicnowledgement of Minutes af March 22 Park and Rec meeting. c. Acknowledgement of March 22nd Planna.ng Cammission meeting m'nuCes. d. Acknowledgement of NDC4 Minutes from March 16. e. Acknowledgement af NDC 4 Ietter to Nationai League of Citie . f. Acknowledgement o� NDC 4 letters to SenaCors. g. Approval af �Iz� List of Ciaims. h. Approval of the List af Licenses. i. Letter from Councilwoman Witt on Representative Seaberg, j. Acknowledgement of letCer from W.A. Lang Company on Workers Compensation dividend. k. Ackn.owledgement o£ memo fram City Clerk an Opticom. 1. Acknowledgement of letters from Mn/Dat and Steve Loeding on Mendota Interc2�ange. End of Cansent Calendar. 5. Bid Award on MAC property impravament project. {gee attached bid jtabulation and recommendata.on). � 6. HEARIhiGS: a. Linvill Associates Praposal for Commercial Facilities Devel pment Project. (See attached Notice of Hearing) 7:30 F.M. b. Northland Compan.y Propasal for Commercial Facilities Develo ment 1'roject. {See attached No�ice of Hearing 7:45 P.M. 7. Cammission i2eports: 1 a. HEARING, Case No. 83-0$, Van, Application for Condition�l for iill. {Reconunend appraval} . $;0{} P.M. b. Case Na, 83-14, Frenz, Application for W�t2ands Permit, { c. Case No. $3-11, United Properties, Application far Varian� approval). d, HEARING, Case No. 83-12, tlna.ted Properties, Conditianal Us (Recammend Approval). $:45 P.M. �e PermiC commend apprc�vaZ�. { Rc�c amznen d Permit. � r - 2 - 8. New Business. a, Request for foundation permit from United Praperties. {S�e attached memo from Code Enforcement Officer}� b. Represent�iv��rt ���be�wi��be �r„es�it �,o�di��uss lega�slaCive matters. � c. Request for building permit for Visitation Canvent audito�a.um addition. (See attached memo fram Code EnforcemenC Off icer). d. Letter Erom Friendly Hills residents regarding kiddy Park �'ot Lot. e. Letter £rom City of Bloomington regarding State Aid reduct Public Mayor City Administratar a. Mema on employment transition. City Attorney Gi�y Engineer Public Works Director City Clerk a. Me�m� on proposed computer cquisitian. �i. .��_-�=� � �tc�/�"G�i�r1 ..��---�frtc�--�� }�.%�:11/./JU !.� �i �. A4� j 011 L'II . ,� 6� _ l�• /��%'-�ilit''IJ�� � - . h' �� /P���`.... J{� _.. ._..-- / � ' v �,� �r.'�1�--� �.�� � ���,�� -- � � . ��" ����,y� �;�`� � � o.sj /�v ,�d�--�� C' G�%r I � e���.�- ce��---� ��-,�. — � ��-� -- _ . � �s/�1� `� �' U,,�' �. � � -- �;i%� �' ��. l� �� -¢' ���•, � �� � f�,��5 ,�r��..._ ,f— -�� f . G� �- �G���-�-� G�� �'.-��- ���--�" ,:�� ��=� �.;�`�� ����-----�y--�..�-� �.�--f--�� ���� -=� �- .��.:�� � �--�--,.��.�:�� ��_.s� �;�- `��..-,�--,,,,,,�.-�� ' � ''��'� v'����. s. � + n � Page No. 1798 March 15, 1983 � � CITX OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESQTA Minutes of Che Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, March 15, 1983 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of City of Mendota Iieigh�s, was he2d at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayar Lackwood called the meeta.ng �o order at 7:30 o'cloctc P.M. members were present: Mayar Lockwood, Councilmembers Harttnann, tensotta and Witt. APPR4VAL OF Cauncilman Losleben maved appraval of the ca MINUTES of the March lst meeting. Councilman iiartmann seconded the motian. Ayes: 5 Nays: p City Council, , 750 Sau�h foll.owing eben, Mer- ted minutes CONSENT CALENDAR Counc3.lman Hartmann moved approval of the conse t ca�.endar as suhmitted and recommended for approval as part f the regular agenda, along with authorization for �he execut'on af all necessary dacuments contained tharein. l. Acknowledgement of a summary of the March G breakfast meeting. i 2. Acknowledgement of the February Fire Depart report« i I 3. Acicnowledgement of the minutes of the Febru 4. Acknowledgement of the Cade Enforcement legislative t and Treasurer'� 9th NT7C4 meet 1 report. 5. Authorization ta purchase two 19$3 Dodge Di Iomat squad cars at a tatal cost af $17,611.50, thraugh the ennepin County Jaint Purchasing group, and acknowledgement af withdrawal of the Ford Motor Company b3.d which had been a proved on March ls 6, Adoption o£ Resolutian No. 83-23, "RESOLUTT N CALLING FOR A PU HEARING QN A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACZ ITIES DEVEL4PMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICTPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOP MENT AGT AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF A N TICE OF SAID HEAR- ING," the hearing to be canducted on April th at 7:30 P.M. 7. Establishment of a public hearing ta be can ucted on April 5th, at 7:45 P.M. to confirm the preliminary app oval to the Northland Comgany Cammercial Facila.ties Dev Iogman.t Project. 8. Approval of the List of Claims dated March 5, 1983, and tatalling $432,174.55. � 9. Approval af the list of contractorts 13.cens s, granting licenses to: , ; Ames Construction, Inc. Excavating License Conray Canstruction Comgany Genera Contractor C Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ASSESSMENT HEARING -- WAGON WHEEL TRAIL/I-35E WATERMAIN CROSSING Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ` Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 1799 March 15, 1983 D.L. Morrison Construction Rosemount Cement, Inc. D.S. Trudeau Construction Co. Turner Excavating Company General Contractor General Contractor General Contractor General Contractor 10. Approval of the issuance of a Cigarette license to George's Golf Range, Inc. 11. Approval of the issuance of an On and Off Sale Non- Intoxicating License to George's Golf Range, Inc. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpose of the contin- uation of a hearing on the proposed assessment roll for the proposed Wagon Wheel Trail/I-35E watermain crossing project. Public Works Director Danielson stated that, in response to Council direction, letters had been sent to all affected property owners indicating that the Council would consider assessing each of the properties on the basis of the standard lot frontage of 100 feet and deferring the making of the balance of the individual assessments until such time as the properties are more intensely developed. Ae advised that favorable responses had been received from two of the property owners involved, Mr, and Mrs. Bebel an' Mrs. Pace. No other responses were received. Mayor Lockwood asked for questions and comments from the audience. There being no questions or comments, Councilman Losleben moved that the hearing be closed at 7:45 P.M. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Resolution No. 83-24, "RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATERMAIN CROSSING AT WAGON WEIEEL TRAIL-I-35E (IMPROVEMENT N0. 81, PROJECT N0. 2)". Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Councilman Hartmann moved the adoption of Resolution No. 83-25, "RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS �LATING TO WAGON WHEEL TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS AND DEFERRING PAYMENT OF A PORTION OF SUCH ASSESSMENT." Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. DOWNTOWN MENDOTA City Planner Howard Dahlgren was present to discuss the status HEIGHTS STUDY of the "Downtown Mendota Heights" study. He stated that he was present to share his ideas and get input from the Council into planning the downtown area. He placed special emphasis on the need for planning on the handling of the basic traffic circulation � in the area, particularly the crossing of TH 110 and TH 149. ) n Page No. 1800 March 15, 1983 Mr. Dahlgren presented and reviewed ten concepts for traffic circulation and "downtown" development, includin the bridging of a relocated TH 149 over TH 110. There was considerable discussion over the poten ial alternatives, including in particular the alternates relating o where a new TH 149 could best be located within existing rig t-of-way, whether a realignment of TH 149 should extend to a connection with existing TH 149 near Wagon Wheel Trail, or hether a new alignment should end north of the Friendly Hills area. Mr. Dahlgren had advised the Council that if a new T 149 were constructed along the full length existing right of-way, noise- walls or berms in the residential areas would be necessary and could cost approxima.tely $1.5 million. As the result of the discussion, the Council dir cted Mr. Dahlgren to continue to look at utilization of the existi g TH 149 corridor as far east on the right-of-way as poss'ble, bridging over TH 119, and various alternates relating to he length, width, configuration and location of new TH 149. IVY FALLS Mayor Lockwood stated that he has had no further contact with Ivy ADDITION Falls Addition representatives and suggested tha a public IMPROVEMENTS hearing on a proposed street overlay project for the area be conducted. Mayor Lockwood moved the adoption of Resolution "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR FE ASSESSMENT HEARING ON PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEME IVY FALLS ADDITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF ROLL THEREFORE (IMPROVEMENT N0. 79, PROJECT N0. on April 19th, 1983. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 o. 83-26, IBILITY/ S TO SERVE THE OPOSED ASSESSMENT 2)", to be held MISCELLANEOUS In response to a letter from the Metropolitan Co cil, the Council appointed Mayor Lockwood to serve as the City`s ontact person with regard to compliance with environmental reg lations. DISPATCHING Councilman Losleben moved to authorize the Mayor nd City AGREEMENT Administrator to execute an agreement with the C'ty of West St. Paul for dispatching services for 1983. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MISCELLANEOUS The Council acknowledged a memo and proposed Ordi City Administrator relating to height limitations towers and similar devices. Councilman Hartmann concern that the proposed ordinance did not stipu relating to locating devices on a property in suc should a device fall, it would fall within the co property on which it is located. ance from the for radio xpressed ate provisions a manner that fines of the The Council referred the matter to Councilman Mer�tensotto for further research and report. I Page No. 1801 March 15, 1983 LABOR Mr. Gene Tretter was present to update the Council on the NEGOTiATIONS status of labor negotiations. He advised the Council that recent negotiation and mediation has resulted in wage and benefit packages for both the Eolice and Public Works Departments which fall within the 6% guideline established by the Council. The proposed Police labor agreement would result in a top patrolman wage of $2210 per month for the f irst six months of the contract and $2226 per month for the second six Q months, along with a$15 per month increase in the employer's contribution towards insurance (to $125 per month). The proposed Public Works agreement would result in hourly rates of $10.78 for leadmen, $10.78 for the mechanic position, $10.53 for a new Grounds Maintenance position, and $10.28 for maintenance men. The contract would include a$20 per month increase in the employer's insurance contribution (to $135 per month) and preparation and implementation of job descriptions. After discussion, Councilwoman Witt moved to approve the 1983 Police and Public Works Labor Agreements as negotiated, retroactive to January 1, 1983. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 HUBER DRIVE City Engineer Kishel reviewed his memo on the Huber Drive up- IMPROVEMENTS grading project. He stated that the Engineering Department has proceeded with plans and specif ication work on the project on the basis of past Council approval of a 5 Year MSA Plan. He asked that the Council authorize execution of the plans for forwarding to Mn/DOT and that staff be authorized to establish a bid date as soon as the plans receive Mn/DOT approval. Mayor Lockwood moved the adoption of Resolution No. 83-27, "RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF HUBER DRIVE BETWEEN DELAWARE AVENUE AND SOUTH LINE OF THE DELAWARE CROSSING PLAT (IMPROVEMENT N0. 82, PROJECT N0. 8)." Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilman Mertensotto moved that the Mayor be authorized to execute the plans and specifications. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. C Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 WATERMAIN The Council acknowledged a memo from the City Engineer indicating EXTENSION that William Strub has requested an extension of the City's REQUEST water system to serve the proposed development sate on TH 13. . The Council confirmed the Engineer's recommendation that the following conditions be met before any action is taken on the preparation of a feasibility study: That the developer submit a formal petition for improvements along with a waiver of hearin�; that the developer submit a$1,000.00 engineering escrow; and that the Planning Commission be advised of the Council action. � � � SURPLUS EQUIPMENT Ayes: S Nays: 0 EQUIPMENT PURCHASE Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ANNUAL REPORT ADJOURN Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ATTEST: 0 Robert G. Lockwood Mayor Page No. 1802 March 15, 1983 In accordance with the recommendation of the Pub ic Works Supervisor, Councilman Losleben moved that staff be directed to advertise for bids for the sale of the follow'ng surplus equipment: 1954 Dodge cab and chassis and utili y box. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motian. The Council acknowledged a summary of bids recei ed for the purchase of a small tractor and accessories for he street department. Councilman Losleben moved that the low bid of $7,677.00, from Corcoran Hardware of Rosemount for a John 'Deere ractor and accessories be accepted and that acquisition of aid equipment through the Equipment Certificate Fund be author'zed. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. The Council anknowledged and briefly discussed t�e 1982 Public Works and Engineering Annual Report. There being no further business to come before t e Council, Councilman Mertensotto moved that the meeting be adjourned. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:06 o'clock P.M. ' Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk ; T0: City Council FROM: Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Building Activity Report for March, 1983 CURRENT MONTH NO. VALUATION FEE COLLECTED BLDG PERMITS . SFD 6 $638,732.33 $4,438.51 C/I 2 60,300.00 545.33 MISC. 3 4,670.56 151.90 Sub Total 11 $703,702.89 $5,135.74 TRD PERMITS Plbg 8 $ 168.00 Wtr 4 20.00 Swr 3 52..50 Htg, AC & Gas Pipe 3 64.50 Sub Total 18 $ 305.00 L�ICENSING Contractor's �o YEAR TO DATE - 1983 NO. VALUATION 8 $903,842.84 3 60,800.00 6 19,670.56 17 $984,313.40 11 5 6 10 32 Licenses 8 $ 200.00 134 DATE: March 29, 1983 FEE COLLECTED $ 6 ,13 9 . 67� �;,: 555.33� 398.41 $7,093.41 $ 243.00 25.00 105.00 553.00 $ 926.00 $3,350.00 TOTAL 37 $703,702.89_ $5,640.74 � 183 $984,313.40 $11,369.41 YEAR TO DATE - 1982 N0. VALUATION FEE COLLECTED 8 $ 728,464.06 $ 5,301.46 8 2,545,186.00 11,104.88 9 73,862.45 732.69 25 $3,347,512.51 $17,139.03 13 $ 350.00 9 45.00 9 157.50 24 1,830.50 F'�'i 110 $ 2,383.00 $ 2,750.00 190 $3,347.512.51 $22,272.03 NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee and valuation amounts. � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION MII�lUTES March 22, 1983 The regular meeting of the.Mendota Heights Park and Recreation Com� called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Bayless. Members present were Bayless, Williams, McMonigal, Stei�n, Literski and Doffing. Schneeman's excused. Also present was Orville Johnson, City Manager. TRACTOR iission was Knittig, absence was Tom Bayless reported that the Roads and Bridges Dep rtment has finally acquired a tractor which may be used for pa k purposes, such as for the groomi�ng of ball fields. WOOD DUCK HOUSES Rudy Literski reported that six wood duck houses ha e been placed in the following locations: Ivy Falls Park, Friend y Hills Park, Marie Park, Wentworth Park and Wetlands at Lexingto and Marie. FRIENDLY HILLS The Corr�nission reviewed the status of the Friendly TOT LOT Lot. This was prompted by a letter dated March 16, several citizens in the Friendly Hills area. The c quested that the park equipment located at that loc repaired and that the park be maintained. The Comm viewed a 1980 letter_from City Attorney Sherman Win ing the conditions under which that property can be park purposes. It was acknowledged by all members sion that the City has no obligation to maintain th since it is not owned by the City of Mendota Height by the citizens in the Fri�endly Hills area. Rudy L that he has had great di�ffi'culty in maintaining the the last two or three years. The Commission then d possibility of recommending that all park and recre be removed from the Tot Lot and that the City staff to cease any maintenance work at tha.t area. Howeve moved by Williams and seconded by P�1cMonigal that th� writing the letter be invited to the next Commissioi discuss�the situation at the Tot Lot. This motion � mously. Dorothy Mch1onigal agreed to contact the in� signing the letter and invite them to our next meet PARK SURUEY Pri�or to the April meeting each to conduct a park survey at the for the purpose of determining needs of the City's parks. ART IN THE PARK member of the Commi park to which they the maintenance and lills Tot 1983 from tizens re- tion be ssion re- hrop regard- abandoned for f the Commis- t property , but rather terski reported Tot Lot over scussed the tion equipment be instructed , it was � individuals meeting to assed unani- ividuals ng. sion agreed ere assigned lean-up The Commission agreed that the concept of having an art program in the City's parks during the sumner was a good id a and merits further discussion and planning. Commission repres ntatives will continue discussions with Cathy DeCourcy to see if ore concrete plans can be developed. � DALGLISH SUB Tom Bayless reported that Mr. Herb Dalglish is in the DIVISON process of subdividing his property. Mr. Dalglish would like to make a contribution to the Mendota Heights Parks of something in lieu of a cash contribution. Bayless reported that Dalglish works for a nursery and is w111�ng to make contributions amount- ing to $600.00 in the form of trees and/or shrubs. Upon motion by Stein, which was seconded by McMonigal, the Commission unani- mously voted to authorize Jim Danielson and Tom Bayless to deter- mine the type of trees and/or shrubs which would be appropriate as Mr. Dalglish's contribution and where said trees and shrubs should be located. DOWNTOWN MENDOTA Tom Bayless reported that Howard Dahlgren made a presentation to HEIGHTS . the last City Council meeting concerning future plans for a "downtown" area for Mendota Heights to be located in and around Mendota Plaza. Bayless reported that many of these plans involved the rerouti'ng of Highway 149. He indicated that he would keep the Commission appraised of further developments on this issue. VOLKERT RUBBISH PACKER COUNCIL MEETING Tom Bayless reported that Mr. Vokert offered at the last City Council meeting the use of his rubbish packer for the annual city-wide park clean-up day. The Commission agreed that it would keep Mr. Volkert's offer in mind in connection with future dis- cussions concerning the organization and planning of a park clean-up day. Dorothy McMonigal will attend the next City Council meeting as the representative of the Park and Recreation Commission. TENNIS TOURNAMENT Mike Williams discussed the possibility of organizing a junior tennis tournament for the City's park system. He reported that it was probably too late to organize a sanctioned tournament for the summer of 1983. However, the Commission agreed that this was the sort of activity that should be studied for the future. Mike Williams also reported that an unsanctioned tournament could still be organized possib�y for late summer, 1983. The Commis- sion decided to discuss the possibility of organizing such a tournament with Dewey Selander at the next Commission meeting. COUNCIL MIPdUTES Orville Johnson stated that he would provide members of the Corrxnission with copies of City Council minutes at its regular meetings for those who are interested. NEXT MEETING ADJOURN The next meeting of the Park and Recrea�ion Commission will be held A� ril 12, 1983 at 7:00 p.m. It was moved and seconded to adjourn the Commission meeting into a meeting of the Trails Committee. Submitted by Jim Stein, Interim Secretary -2- .. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARK AidD RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTE5 OF TRAILS COMMITTEE March 22, 1983 The firsi regular meeting of the Mendata Neights Fark and Re Commissi�on-Trails Committee was called to order at 8:23 p.m. by C Bob Doffir�g. Members presertt were Kr�i.itig, Bayless, WilTiams, Me Stein, Doffi'ng and Grayden Page. Tom Bayless bega Trai 1 s Corr�nni ttee and Council has asked the the 1974 Trails Plan. reation iairman loni gal , n the meeting by describing the his�ory of t e referred to its ]974 report, He ind�ca�ed t e City Park and Recreation Committee ta update and revise The members of the Committee agreed that several actions mus taker� priar to beginning a fu11-fiedged updating of the exis�ing Plan. First, it was agreed that Jim Stein would contact Orville to determine whether park funds cauld be used in the canstructian bike trails. He would also ask Mr. Jahnson for infarmation conce possible grants and state aids that could be used for the constru of trails. He will alsa cantact Sarb Schmitt at Dakata County ca ing alternative funding possibilities. Second, Mike Williams mad point that it was ir�partant far us to deter€nine whether the c�tiz Mendota Heights are actually interested in using park money to co bike trails. He suggested that we loak into the possibility of c a phone survey to determine the interest of the citizens'in this ject. He agreed to look into the various costs involved in havin survey performed by a prafessianal survey campany. Finally, the of the Committee agreed that it was important ta involve other na Co�mission members in the process, Therefare, it was agreed to a the meeting until April 14, 1983 at 7:00 p.m., at which time an e would be r�ade to have other citizens become a part of the Traiis Submitted by Jim Stein, Interim Secretary be rails ohnson of ning tion cern- the ns of struct nducti ng ro- a embers -Park journ fort 4l3]tTE'! ���� . � 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 22, 1983 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was c lled to order by Chairperson Kruse at 8:03 o'clock P.M. The following membe s were present: Kruse, Morson, Burke, Butler, Frank and Stefani. Blesener was excused. Also present were Planning Consultant Howard Dahlgren, Cit Admin- istrator Orvil Johnson and Public Works Supervisor Jim Danielson. APPROVAL OF Minutes of the February 22nd meeting had been su mitted MINUTES previously. Stefani moved, seconded by Frank, t at the minutes be approved as submitted. Voting:, all yes. CASE ��83-02, Chairperson Kruse noted that the public hearing CULLIGAN, continued from the previous meeting had been sch PRELIMINARY PLAT this evening, but that staff had recommended pos hearing until April 26th.in order to prepare a s engineering report. Frank moved, seconded by Bu continue the public hearing to April 26th. Voti hat had been duled for poning the tisfactory ler, to Q: all ayes. CASE ��83-06, STRUB Chairperson Kruse called the meeting to order fo the purpose CONDITIONAL USE of a continued public hearing on an application by Mr. Bill PERMIT FOR PUD Strub for a conditional use permit to construct our buildings on TH 13. Mr. Strub briefly reviewed his applic tion, noting that 140 parking stalls should be sufficient for the 29,000 square feet of useable floor space. He also not d an increased landscaping plan and stated that the buildings w 11 be somewhat earth sheltered, with earth berms coming to just below the window sills. Mr. Strub displayed brochures of imilar projects in the area. He indicated that staging was unknown at the present time, but that hopefully one buil ing would be constructed this summer, possibly two next�summe and finishing in 1985. He noted that each individual office w 11 be required to pay monthly dues for maintenance. Financing as to have been handled through Metropolitan Life, but this has now been changed. He had no definite answers yet as to h w the project would be financed, although he mentioned the pos ibility of a tax exempt mortgage note. He stated that five p rking stalls per 1,000 square feet of useable floor space would b allocated. Mr. Strub stated that the roof mater_�ial would be opper, if available, otherwise it would beYiarctl split cedar shakes. The windows will be a reflective blue-green mirrored glass, similar to the IDS Tower. High pressure sodium lighting will be used, casting light down, not up or around. He stated that low signs, about four feet by eight feet, will be used and ill be designed by a graphics consultant. There will be only on sign on TH 13, naming the project, but not naming the individua offices. He stated that a variance would be needed for parki g only, not for a front yard setback. Chairperson Kruse asked for' comments from Planni g Consultant Howard Dahlgren. Mr. Dahlgren replied that he c uld make no comments, since he had not received any plans to review. � Pl�intiing Commission Minutes, Mareli 22, 1983 Page 'Cwo ` P VAI S I; Mr. Strub noted that the most successful marketing manner is through direct mail. Chairperson Kruse noted that the commission needs a relatively final decision on building materials and suggested that Mr. Strub and his architect, Bob Ackermann, meet with staff in a few days to go�over what is needed. After further discussion, Butler moved, seconded by Burke, to continue the public hearing until April 26th to allow for further documentation of needed items and that the developer and architect meet with City staff to make sure everything is complete. It was pointed out that a phasing plan would be needed in the event that only a portion of the project is constructed. Voting on the motion: all ayes. The applicant is to have his material to City staff for reports at least seven days prior to the next Planning Commission meeting and preferably 21 days prior to the meeting to allow for a satisfactory review period. E��83-14, Mr. Mark Frenz was present to explain his request to build a NZ, WETLANDS single family residence on Lot 11, Block 3, Rolling Green. MIT He distributed letters from his adjoining neighbors, both approving his building plans. He noted that his home would be a two story, flat-roofed structure, which is permissible according to the Zoning Ordinance. Chairperson Kruse noted that he would not be allowed to place fill in the area of the 100 year high water mark and that he would not be able to come back in future years to request f ill to allow a more useable back yard or a swimming pool ��83-11, D PROPERTIES, [�CE TO LOT FOR PUD After further discussion, Butler moved, seconded by Morson, to recommend approval of the wetlands permit, waiving the public hearing requirement, and allowing construction 53 feet, 2 inches from the pond to the face of the deck on the south side of the home. Voting: all ayes. Mr. Boyd Stofer and Mark Cella were present representing United Properties. � While they were setting up their presentation, Chairperson Kruse noted that each of the commission members had received a letter from several Mendota residents, voicing their concern over � increase in volume or rate of runoff and their feeling that the drainage system/holding pond for Valley View Oak is not performing adequately. Mr. Stofer explained the proposed project,,:noting that it would be located at the intersection of Pilot Knob Road, Northland Drive and Mendota Heights Road. It�consis�ts of four platted lots, Lots l, 2, 7 and 8, Block 3, Mendota Heights Industrial Park, and that they would like to replat the parcel into three lots. The first building would contain about 50,000 Planning Commission Minutes, Marcli 22, 1983 CASE ��83-13, UNITED PROPERTIES, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT f CASE ��83-08, VAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR FILL square feet and would be leased to high technol� research type projects. The remainder of the b vary from 2,000 square feet to 20-30,000 square buildings would be 12 foot clear height, brick glass predominately in front. There will be a the top to contain the individual office names. that nine foot parking stalls are being request contains 8.25 acres, whereas a minimum of 10 ac for a planned unit development and he requested the lot size. After further recommend app for a nlanned discussion, Burke moved, seconded roval of the variance from the 10 ige Three gy office/ ildings would feet. The xterior, with etal band near He also noted d. The site es is required a variance to Stefani, to e minimum size unit development. Voting: all a�es. Chairperson Kruse called the meeting to order f a public hearing on an application from United a conditional use permit for a planned unit dev construction of three structures in Mendo�a Hei Park. Mr. Stofer noted that more parking stall in the f irst phase of construction than will be noted that the truck parking will be hidden bet He noted that the 2'6" metal band for signage w standard format and size for the office letteri also noted that a metal sign monument would be the required front yard area. The project woul profile light standards, which would only be on the truck areas, otherwise they will be in the The poles will be 24 feet high, with the light the same as what is used at ComServ and Big Whe r the purpose of roperties for lopment for hts Industrial will be installed needed, and een the structures. 11 contain a gs. Mr. Stofer ocated within contain low the buildings in arking lots only. shining down, Planner Dahlgren noted that the request to repl t the area into three lots is the acceptable way of handling th matter and that their plans are very fine. There was no one present for the public hearing for the Planned Unit Development as pre amended, with city staff approval prior meeting, conditioned that the landscape staff, as well as utilities, that build sented, r as may be to the pril 5th Council lan be reviewed b ing plan details and signage be reviewed by the Code Enforcement Off: all ayes. Chairperson Kruse called the meeting to order f a public hearing on an application by Scott Van use permit to allow f ill in excess of 400 cubic placed on Lot 3, Block 4, Sunview Hills, to all of a single family residence. Mr. Van was pres had been at the previous meeting, to briefly ex In discussing his corrected topo drawing,',it wa the contours were drawn incorrectly along the d er. Vot r the purpose of for a conditional yards to be w construction nt, as he lain his request. noted that iveway area. . �� lanning Commission Minutes, March 22, 1983 ��83-13, GREGATION SONS JACOB, DITIONAL USE MIT & VARIANCE Page rour Chairperson Kruse expressed concern with the 13% grade for the driveway, especially during the winter months. Mr. Van noted that there was a two car length stopping spot at the top of the drive�ay and that the reason the driveway was placed at that spot was to avoid the heavy traffic on Hunter Lane as it came over the rise. Mr. Van also noted that he would probably put a culvert in place, even if the driveway is blacktopped. He originally noted that he would def initely place a culvert in place if the driveway were gravel material, but has since been informed that gravel driveways are no longer permitted in Mendota Heights. Chairperson Kruse suggested that a culvert be put in if the driveway is blacktopped to prevent the blacktop from breaking up. There was much discussion about the 80 foot long retaining wall that Mr. Van had constructed which ranges in size from 3 feet to 6 feet in height, tapering down to one foot at the end. Chairperson Kruse asked for questions and comments from the audience. Mr. John Mathisrud, 1860 Hunter Lane, was present for the discussion and expressed concern over the retaining wall, noting that he had been satisfied with past Van projects. After noting the incorrect contours on the drawing, several members noted that they would like to see the plan changed prior to City Council approval. After further discussion, Morson moved, seconded by Butler, to recommend approval of the conditional use permit subject to preparation of a drawing in similar scale, correctly depicting the fill on the westerly portion of the lot. Chairperson Kruse offered a friendly amendment adding that l. 2. The retaining wall should be adequately and properly designed. That the culvert be provided in the driveway at the correct grade. Voting on the motion and amendment: All ayes. Chairperson Kruse called the meeting to order for the purpose of a public hearing on an application for the Congregation Sons of Jacob for a conditional use permit and variance to allow construction of a synagogue on the northeast corner of Hunter Lane and TH 110 Service Road. Mr. Roger Johnson from Johnson- Forberg Associates, was present to give a background of the project, which was approved by the,City Council in 1977. He noted that the sanctuary will seat 300 people and that several large, mature trees will be retained along the north property line. The building will contain 8,500 square feet and there is room for future expansion of the wood frame structure. The height will be less than 25 feet. He noted that there would be one parking stall for every 3� seats, and that a fence would be added along the northwest corner, as well as new trees. Planning Commission Minutes, March 22, 1983 Mr. Johnson stated that a variance to the par is requested. The stalls are proposed to be rather than the required 10 feet. P�ge Five stall width feet wide, Commission members asked whether there are any mergency entrances/exits from the parking lot. Mr. John on responded that no exits to Hunter Lane are allowed, only o TH 110. He noted that sodium vapor lighting will be use in the parking lot and that no definite design for the top of he synagogue has been made. The structure will be flat roof d. Chairperson Kruse asked for questions and comme ts from the audience. Several persons were in attendance a d noted that hooded lights were approved in 1977 and that is what they would like to see now also. It was also noted that c nifer trees were agreed upon in 1977, not deciduous trees. It w s also mentioned that a minimum tree size should be known and ag eed to by all parties concerned. Mr. Johnson explained that hey intend to start building this spring and would like to be finished by September, 1983. The audience also expressed s me concerns over the drainage path that would follow after he parking lot is paved. Chairperson Kruse noted that he would like to s e a more detailed plan regarding landscaping and screening as a v sual barrier between the synagogue parking lot and adjacent homes. Mr. Frederick W. Fischer, 1163 Veronica Lane, s ated that he would like a detailed landscape plan showing the type of trees and shrubs furnished, so the residents could be awa e of what would be happening. . After further discussion, Stefani moved, second�d by Burke, to continue the public hearing to April 26. Votin : all ayes. PRE-APPLICATION Mr. Robert Shields was present to get input fro the commission MEETING, SHIELDS members as to whether or not they thought it wo ld be possible to build a single family home on the northeast orner of Dodd and Marie. He had plans for an earth-sheltered home, but after much discussion, felt that perhaps a convention 1 type home would be better suited to the lot. The members noted as well as Planner Dahlgren, that the lot would be extreme y difficult to work with. It was pointed out that the topo ma was very possibly incorrect, and the first step for Mr. Shields t do would be to obtain a correct drawing showing the lot lines nd topography. VERBAL REVIEW ADJOURN Public Works Director Danielson gave a verbal r view of the Dalglish, Henrich and Kegler cases that had bee approved by the City Council. There being no further business to come Stefani moved, seconded by Burke, that Voting: all ayes. before he Commission, the meet'n� be ad_journed. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:01 o'clock P.M. I Commission member Stefani noted that he would b out of town for the April 26th commission meeting. � 0 I. NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION , c/o City Offices �750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FULL COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - MARCH 16. 1983 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Dave Zemke at 7:35 p. The following Directors were present: Baird- Sunfish Lake Zemke- Mendota Heights Hanson- West St. Paul Kinney- South St. Paul Tatone- Inver Grove Heights Witt- Mendota Heights EXCUSED ABSENT Harrison- Sunfish Lake Walker- West St. Paul Boelter- Mendota Bruestle- Mendota Henderson- Inver Grove H UNEXCUSED ABSENT Beaird- Lilydale Goad- Lilydale n. Also present were Adrian Herbst, legal counsel, John Gibbs, legal counsel, Nelsene Karns, Group W Cable, T.J. Ryan, T.J. Ryan & Associates, obert Sachs, Continental Cable and Jane Salen, staff secretary. II. Tatone moved approval of the agenda of March 16, 1983, seconded b Motion carried unanimously. � III. Motion by Witt, seconded by Baird to approve the minutes of March Motion carried unanimously. Tatone moved receipt of the Executive Committee minutes of March seconded by Bruestle. Motion carried unanimously. IV. Recital regarding communications to the Board. � Minutes received from the MCCB of March 11, 1983 meeting. � Walker received news articles of cable activities from the F issue of the TBS Transmitter. witt. 2, 1983. 2, 1983, Bruestle moved to receive the communications, seconded by Lanegra�n. Motion carried unanimously. I V. Review of the RFP Status. Distribution of the RFP began as of 9:00 a.m. March 16, 1983. One copy of the RFP was sent to each member city with a letter e: the need to keep the RFP available for public review along'with the public notice. 1983 plaining copy of -2- m A letter and copy of the RFP was provided ta the following requestors: Group W Cable Telephone & Data Systems Cantinental Cable Company Dowden Communications Commutronics, Inc. ELRP, Group VI. 1982 Expenditures Kinney dist�ibuted to the commissian far review the 1VDC4 itema,zed 1982 expenditures. {attached} Discussion of the 1982 expenditures followed. VII. Other Business On Chairman's request counsel discussed a new bi1.1 introduced �.o the Minnesata lec}isla�ure, Sena�e file 5.406, the bill praposes to abolish the MCCB board and staff and possibly incorporate a new department. Herbst distri.buted a resolution addressing the revised Go].dwater Legislation and Natianal League of Ci�,ies nec}otiatian. Baird maved �o transmit the sense of the resolutian ta the National League af Cities and Minnesota Congressional representatives. Seconded by Henderson. Aye: Zerrcke, Baird, Henderson, Wit�, Hanson, Walker, Bruestle, Baelter, Kinney Abstained: Tatone Motion carried. 0 Chairman Zemke suggested that the full commission need no�. meet un�il May 18, 1983 uniess a special need, such as responding ta a cable company questipn related to policy interpretation, shauld arise and tha�_the Executive Committee be respansible for comm�ssian activities cluring the two mon�.h period. Discussa.on fallowed. Baird moved that the next meeting date be set for May 18, Z983. That the Executive Committee meet as needed and pay the bil.ls. Ad-interium a special meeting will be held for the commission if needed. Seconded by Tatone. Aye: Baird, Tatane, Zemke, Henderson, Boelter, Brues�.le, Kinney, Witt Nay: Wal.ker Abs�aine�: Hanson, Lanegran Motian carried. VII. Report af Of£icers Kinney reported receipt of security bonc3 for 1983 from the Great American Insurance Campany. A check was received for $7.5Q from Byron Wertx af Telephone & Data Systems for March 1983 minutes. /' -3- Treasury Balance- $8,054.32 Bi11s 6,555.46 Herbst & Thue {�anuary) 3,477.45 Herbst & Thue (February) 785.03 Anita �tech (January) � 644.96 Anita Stech (February) 245.00 Mendota Heights (secretarial) Zemke moved ta pay the January and February Anita Stech bi31s and 5,555.46 aqainst the January Herbs� & Thue bill. Seconded by Baird. Mation arried unanimously. IX. Presentations by interested members of the public. T.J. Ryan introduced Robert Sachs wha is the Director of Corpora for Continental Cable Company. X. Tatone moved ta adjourn a� 9:00 p.m., secanded by Hanson. Mation mously. . I Prepared byz .7ane Sa1en staff secretary Development ied unani- 0 NDC4 1982 BUDGET EXPENDITURES BY FUND AND ITEM I, LEGAL SERVICES 11/16/81-1/26/32 2/5/82-4/29/82 5/82 6/82 7/82 8/82 9/82 10/82 11/82 12/82 HERBST & THUE HERBST & THUE HERBST & THUE HERBST & THUE HERBST & THUE HERBST $ THUE HERBST & THUE HERBST & THUE HERBST & THUE HERBST & THUE TOTAL II, CAB.LE CONSULTING SERvICES 6/23-6/30/82 ANITA BENDA 7/82 ANITA BENDA 7/82 RALPH CAMPBELL 8/82 ANITA BENDA 8/82 RALPH CAMPBELL 9/82 ANITA BENDA 10/82 ANITA STECH 11/82 ANITA STECH 12/82 ANITA STECH 11/1-12/31/82 REED CARPENTER TOTAL �1562,00 $1774,50 �1399,00 � 316,00 � 355,50 � 367,50 �4065,50 �2341,50 �1802,00 �1903,00 �1�5, 886 , 50 > 120,00 ► 720 , 00 ► 460, 70 � 630,00 � 39,00 �1232,01* � 75,00 1162,50 780,00 1019,37 ��,238.58 .. � III, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS A, PHOTOCOPYING AND 11/16/81-1/26/�2 5/82 6/82 7/82 7/82 7/82 ais2 8/82 9/82 9/82 10/82 10/82 10/82 10/82 11/82 11-12/82 12/82 B, CITY STAFF 7/82 . 8/82 9/82 10/82 11/1-12/10/82 ti MATLING HERB,ST & THUE HERBST & THUE HERBST & THUE HERBST & THUE NERBST & THUE-PosTA�E AN I:TA BE�1DA HERBST & THUE ANITA BENDA HERBST & THUE-Pos�Ta�E HERB.ST & THUE ANITA STECH ANITA STECH-PosTA�E. HERBST & THUE HERBST & THUE-Po�Ta�E HERB�ST & THUE ANITA STECH HERBST & THUE TOTAL REIMBURSEMENT SECRETARIAL SECRETARIAL SECRETARIAL SECRETARIAL SECRETARIAL FEES FEES FEES FEES FEES TOTAL 3�4,35 9,00 3,90 1�,20 3,00 28�, 23 �,15 13,27 2, sa 33,45 5,Q0 ,40 54�,15 13,6Q 9,00 64,05 39,60 � 594,15 � 103,85 $ 172 , 50 � 412,50# � 225,00 � 392,50 �1,306,35 C, MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES 4/21/82 GLOBE PUBLISHING ; SUPPLIES 5/19/82 APOLLO AGENCY SURETY BOND 6/2/82 K, HANSON-SUPPLIES 6/2/82 FAIRCHILD PUBLICATIONS ADVERTISEMENT ; 6/2/82 INSTITUTIONAL SALES INC FILE CABINET 4/22/82 CHECK PRINTING 7/7/82 GLOBE PUBLISHING STATIONARY '', 8/82 CTIC- FORMS 9/�2 GLOBE PUBLISHING STATIONARY 11/30/82 GLOBE PUBLISHING STATIONARY 12/82 ACTION MESSENGER DELIVERY 12/82 APOLLO AGENCY SURETY BOND 1/83 SPEED PRINT-PRitvTiNs 12/82 JAMES M. KING � INSURANCE TOTAL � 16,80 � 50 , 00 � 1,77 $ 150, 00 � 162,75 $ 24,17 � 14?_ , 28 � 750,00 � 46,20 � 106,86 �� • : � � 50,00 $ 240,00 � 566,50 �2,317,13 P IV, MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES 11/16/81-1/26/82 HERBST & THUE-MILEAGE 5/82 SERVICE CHARGE 5/82 HERBST & THUE-MILEAGE S�SZ HERBST & THUE-TELEPHONE 6/82 HERBST & THUE-Mi�EA�E 6/82 SERVICE CHARGE 7/82 SERVICE CHARGE 6/�2 ANITA BENDA-TYPtN� . 7/82 ANITA BENDA-TYPiN� 7/82 ANITA BENDA-Mi�Ea�E 5/2-7/26/82 DAVE ZEMKE-TELEPHONE S/82 SERVICE CHARGE 8/82 ANITA BENDA-TYPi►v� 8/82 ANITA BENDA-MILEAGE 8/82 ANITA BENDA-TE�EPHONE �/S2 AN ITA BENDA-rHaPs 9/82 SERVICE CHARGE 9/82 HERBST & THUE-Mi�EasE 9�HZ HERBST & THUE-TELEPHONE 10/82 ANITA STECH-TYPiN� 10/82 ANITA STECH-rE�EPHONE 10/82 ANITA STECH-aiRFaRE 10/82 SERVICE CHARGE 10/82 HERBST & THUE-TELEPHONE 10/82 � HERBST & THUE-MILEAGE 11/82 HERBST & THUE-MILEAGE 11/82 HERBST & THUE-PRINTtNG 11/82 HERBST & THUE-rE�EPHONE 11/82 SERVICE CHARGE 12/82 SERVICE CHARGE 1/83 SERVICE CHARGE 11-12/82 ANITA STECH-rYPtN� 11-12/82 ANITA STECH-MILEAGE 11-12/82 ANITA S�TECH-TE�EPHorvE 11-12/82 ANITA STECH-AIRFARE 11-12/82 ANITA STECH-caR RENTAL AND PARKING• r 52,00 6,94 7.00 4, 87 8,00 6, 0� 5,71 37, �0 97, 75 13,60 21, 51 5,65 39 , 00 14,00 11, 75 5,19 7,53 41, 80 10, 37 24,14 39, 60 162,00 6, 74 16,95 35,40 24,60 12,84 12,58 7, 88 5,67 5,13 437, 85 81,50 125,�95 771, 00 � 153,64 IV, MISCELLANEQUS EXPENSES - CONT`D 12182 NERBST & THUE-MILEAGE 12182 HERBST & THiJE-T�LEPHONE T4TAL CAPITULATION OF BUDGET EXPENDiTURES I, LEGAL SERVICES II, CABLE CaNSULTING SERVICES i I I ADi�INISTRATIVE COSTS (A -r��ou�w C) IV, MISCELLANEIUS EXCENSES GRAND TOTAL � 20, 00 � 19,26 }2, 359, 23 .�, �s�, �a �,238,58 4,217.63 12 359 �2 , ,$ � .� ` ` ... _ : - .' �:.o—. " - _ = •. , -. - . . . . • . • , ' . • I _ — � . . , s _ _ : . - �,I :.,..p•.. _.,"I �' '_'__ ' •.". .�. ___..�.r... i NOR�HERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION � c/o City Offices �750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 Cynthia Pols National League of 1301 Pennsylvania Washington, D.C. Dear Ms.. Pols: March 29, 1983 Cities Avenue Northwest 20004 I: am writing: on� behalf of �he. Northern Dakota. Couni Communicat�ions Comr.lission (NDCi}�) �which represents seven located in the suburban areas:. of P�inneapolis and St.- Pat Min�nesota. Tfiese ci.ties� are� Inver Grove Heights,� Li:lyd� Mendota, Men.dota• Heights, South St.: Pau1, Sunfish Lake, West St.. Paul.. • The. NDC4 was created t� obtain and administer a ca franchise on behalf of its member�cities. A single cab communications system serving each of the cities jointl the-expected result. The entire area includes approxim 25,000 homes. i The NDC4 has unde�taken a Iong and arduous franchi process which lasted many years for some of the members process was in compliance with the standards of Minneso franchising procedures and according to a scheme that w not only be fair and reasonable for all parties but pro those communications needs as well. The NDC4 believes it was successful in doing so, and anticipates that it receive proposals from several cable companies desirous serving the NDCg area according to the decisions that h been made. y Cable cities i, Ie, • and le e is tely ing This uld ect hat ill of ve We are-now concerned about pending legislation suc as 5.66 and the proposed NLC/NCTA compromise. Specificall , our�concerns are as follows: l. There is no prevailing need to abrogate the a�thority of local units of government by federal legislation. 2. TYiose franchising authorities that have enter good faith"franchising processes, and, particularly, th that have complied with laws such as in Minnesota, ough :d into >se : to _� � y, - � '� _ � � :.. - ..�._ .�,�;_..,::, .,}.ac. z�r�r.t;�K..3za<s:'3r ", _ :-" .. . ... _ . . . . .. . • . .. .. ...,.. _.., .._ . ., .. . . • _ . _ . . .�... ,. _ ' : ' . . _ . . :. _- �. , . . . �N;,� . .. . . ._ .- ' ' ._ . . • ' - ... � -- _ •. ..... . • "'` • . . � -• - - •=' •. .; . ' : _' . . - . .. ,. ...,, . "� ;, .. .... : . , ., . . • . . � -•. .�_ .. _ '•_..._ • •, : ' { . Cynthia Pols Page Two March 29, 1983 have the�integrity of the negotiated f�anchises preserve through grandfathering in the event.federal legislation_'s enacted.� 3. Exemption from the federal legislation sfiould e considered in those states where there is existing state legislation describing specific and uniform procedures that must be complied with by the local units of govern nt witfiin that state. I.t is our understanding tha.t cable.companies, when om- peting for- franchises-, freely of.fer- servic.es and= per.sonn l; financial, equipment and bandwith commitments�,to meet th �. ongoing cable communications needs of their�subscribers. We also.understand-that no one�can force a cable. company to make these offers.. - At the last meeting of the NDCq, a�resolution was a proved authorizing me to direct our�reaction to the recently an ounced compromise to you and the. Senators of Minnesota. It is ur hope that you will accept our comments as constructive i asmuch as we do recognize that.the NLC has worked very hard to e- solve these very important issues pertaining to cable te evision. Very truly yours, ' � � - David H. Z mke � Chairman DHZ:ndr cc: Senator Rudy Boschwitz Senator David Durenberger Members of the NDCg League of Minnesota Cities. , " '� � �� � ;.__,_ � :. . ..,���..�,._.� = - ^' -- -- '..r . _ - . �_ : � ,. � _ , .. .. _ , " .• j, � . , . .; .. ..--"--- - - ---- - - - I NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSI� RESOLUTION WHEREP;S,. the Northern Dakota County Cable Communicati ns Commission ("NDC4") is a joint powers commission organize by seven (7) member cities of Lilydale, Mendota, Mendota Heights, nver Grove� Heights, Sunfish Lake, South St-.. Paul, and West St. Paul; and WHEREAS, the NDC4 has reviewed the provisions of S.66 known as the Goldwater Bi.11, and, in addition, the Summary of t e proposed compromise between the National League of Cities and the National Cab1e Te1_evision Association; and �WHEREAS, the NDC:4 desires that.it go on record with t e - - National. Leaguef of Ci:°ties• as� well as its congressionaT de egation � , . froni� Mi•nnesota as to its� pos•ition c.oncerning _this: propose '- � federal legi.slatior�; arrd WHEREAS,. the:NDC4�; over the past.several years; under ook a.�� proces.s�in accordance�with Minnesota law.to grant a franc ise for a cable communications� syste� to serve i.ts seven ( 7) memb r. cities; and WHEREAS, the�-franchise process:included the developme t of numerous policy decisions and a decision to negotiate wit a cable company desiring to propose a cable system in accor ance with these decisions; and I WHEREAS,.NDG4 believes that enactment of federal legi lation that would in effect preempt, change or alter the authori y of the NDC4 with regard to its franchise process would impac tremen�- dously upon the policy decisions it has made; and � WHEREAS, the-NDC4 also wishes° to advise the National eague of Cities that it is concerned that it� did not have the o por- tunity to review nor to understand the proposed.compromis be- tween the�National League of Cities and the National Cabl Television Association before it was announced at the con ention in Washington, D.C.- and, had it had such an opportunity, ould �have voiced strenuously its concern relative to this legi lation inasmuch as the NDC4 firmly be�lieves. that the federal leg'sla- tion proposed by Senator•Goldwater and 5.66 as well as th pro- posed compromise-, does, in fact, invade- local control and impact on in a retroactive way, good faith, bargains, agreements and negotiated policy decisions that have been entered into a a local level that cannot possibly be resolved in an across the board federal legislative process. � � , _. 0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE NDC4 in a.r meeting assembled, as follows: r 1. That it does, in fact, oppose 5.66, the Goldwate}� Bill. 2« That, if the National.League of Cities intends. t de- velop a proposed.compromise to S.66 along the lines sugge ted by i.ts Summary distributed at the�National League of Cities onven- tion in Washington, D.C�. in March, 1983, that the Na.tiona League of Cities strenuously work towards the preservation of lo al control of existing franchis.es by seeking to have the pro isions of existing franchises and those finalizing processes gov rned by existing state legislatione 3. That the Chairman of the NDC4 is hereby authoriz directed to� immediately inform� the National League� of. Ci.t the Minnesota congressional members of.�this Resolution an position• of th.e NDC4� a�nd to. follow. th�rough. on- this- by see provide wkiatever other.;inf.ormat.ion is necessary�and to ta other steps: as- may be� necessary towards:- the• development o defeat. of - S. 66, or, in� the. alterna.tive, a reasonable:' comp consistent wi.th the�provisi.ons outlined in°this Re.solutio pos-ition . of� � th� NDC4:... - - , � �' � ►. t. � `� 0 I ATTEST: NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE �OMMUNICATZONS COMMISSION iNI oZ° �J ' Secretary 0 By Its: ( d and es and the. ing. to� e such• totaT omise� as the �4) 1' • �_ _- . w r-:�.' � '•^4�� .-• • .• " -.. . � � � � ... I . ' ' NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE ' COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION � c/o City Offices �750 South Piaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 March 29, 1983 �S_.�. -•Fw' ., � !,' , �.. �. ��M, �... _ .. The Honorable David Durenberger 353 Russell Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear•Senator Durenberger�: , _ - , Enclosed is a le�ter�I have sent to the National L agt; of� Cities:expressing our. c.oncern. about the possible ena t= ment of`federal legislation pertaining�to cable •televis'on. It is our hope that you will recognize our positio and be supportive o£ it. Since franchising of cable te e- vision is so much of a.local matter, it does not seem possible that any legislation by the�federal government could deal with the many and.varied terms of franchises negotiated.between the cable operator and a local unit of government. I Thank you. ' � � fVery trul y urs, � . � - - � David H. Z ce � DHZ:ndr ! Enclosure' cc: Members of the NDC4 League of Minnesota Cities e - � � NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE , COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION , � c/o City Offices ' 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 March 29, 1983 '� The Honorable Rudy Boschwitz 506 Hart Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear- Senator- BQschwitz�: . - � Enclosed� is a. letter I have sent to tYie National L ague of Cities{expressing our concern about the possible ena t- ment�of federal Tegisla�tion pertazning, to cable televis'on. It is our'hope that you will recognize our positio and be supportive of it.. Since franchising of cable te e- vision is so much of a locaZ matter, it does not seem possible that any legislation by the federal government could deal with the many and varied terms of franchises negotiated between the cable operator�and a local unit of government. ! Thank you. Very truly o s, . David H. Ze Chairman DHZ:ndr � Enclosure , cc: Members of the NDCg League of Minnesota Cities --.`____ _: . . �� f ., i�� � Dept 10-Admin ---Dept 50 Rd& Bridges , 4/5/�83 CLAIMS LIST 15-Engr ' 60 Utilities , 20-Police 70 Parks CHECK R�'GZSTER 30-Fire ' 80 Planning AMOUNT V�N00? ZTEM4�ECS�G�tI�T�ON 90 An��t�l.���r}tr��� INL 6.15 DONN pNOE�SON IAS ADJ 3MOS"83 0)-424�-020-20 37.32 DONN A�CERSON ZAS ADJ 3MOS 83 D'�-4246-02D-2U •�: -- - _. - 43.47 * -. _ .. .- - -- - - - - -- _._---- �---- -- -- -� 45.D0 FLtYO ARN�T I�S ADJ 3MOS 83 0�-4245-020-20 45,00 # � 45.00 NU��1 6LACKFELLNEF, I�S �ADJ 3MOS 83 09-4245-02D-20 4 5 .0 0 # - - - - . _. _ __ - -- _.. __ . .__. ._ � 28.44 TERRY BLUM INS ADJ 3MOS83 Da-424b-070-70 28.44 * � 45.00 LARRY BRIOG�R I�S ADJ 3MOS83 I D7-4245-020-20 45 .0.0_ *__ _.___. _ ; --- - - -� - - -. . .._ -- --� - -- - -- - --�- - �- � - t � 15.fl2 CA�ITCL SUPPLY CO EXT=iVOtR TNKR TRK 1�-4G30-OOD-�0 7 5.02 * � 3b0.00 CAK CTY AUTI FIRE FIG�-!TER TRNG 01-44�0-030-30 -- -- ... . . -- - --- - ... _ 3 b D . 0 t1 * - - - -- - - -- ----- - �- --- - -�- --- _ _ � � 42.23 FO�T RD HD�IE MISC PARTS 01-4305-05�-SO 4Z.23 * ^ ' � 390.55 _ FAYDEN MURPHY FOUIP __ SANDtR RPRS __ ,____ _ 09,-433ti-490-50 390.55 * � 275.OD II�'C CCNF REGR R�GR W, D�LARACSA Oi-4400-110-i0 215.00 * . � 225.00 INTL FALLS FD ANiVUAL CONF REGR 0'�-4400-030-30 225.00 * ---- �- -- - --- --- -- ----- -._-__.. _ � __. � 6�.U0 LEONARD KANITZ INS AOJ 3MOS83 U1-4245-OSU-SO 6(1.00 * � 40.22 LUXOR LZGHTIhG LITE 8UL8S 0'l-4335-310-5Q 40.22 LUXGR LIGli7Ii�G LITc L�ULBS 0�9-4335-38D-70 40.23 LUXOR LIGHTING LITE BULBS �5-43�35-3i0-6a 'l20.b7 * � 24.OD RUCULPN LiTERSKI IAS AOJ 3MOS133 01-4245-D70-70 2$.44 RUCOIPH LITERSKI iRS ADJ 3MOS 83 0�-4246-0?0-7U 52.44__.*. _ _ . .. - - .� 19.95 NICWEST �HLSL TIRE SAl INV724010 0'�-4330-440-20 19.95 * . � 4$9,�32 STATE BLDG INSPECTOR 1ST OTR S/CNGS 01-4447-1)0-70 4�9.�2 * , - - .. _..__- - � �740.00 GAVIES HATER E�UIP OIAMETER COUFLING 37-4460-908-UO 740.00 * � 12.00 OAKOTA CTY 7RIEl.NE '1983REN��JAL t31-44�2-1�0-10 , .. .. _ _ _ _- �--.._ _ ._ � �� AM0IJNT � 2.0� * 4�240.00 4� 240.00 * 25.00 25.00 * 2, 394.StJ 4b.(30 2�440.50 # 28.44 28,44 * 44.4$ 44.48 * k5.D0 45.00 # 60.00 60.OD * 60.00 60,00 * 4 5 .00 45.a0 * 5 .28 7.9fi 73.18 * 66.50 b6.50 * 50.00 5�.�0 * 23.34 23.34 • 45..00 45.OD # 1�.86 17.86 �7.87 53.59 * 29,075.00 29,075.00 # 89.01 , CHECK REGISTER � U�NDGR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT Na. I�V, - - -- - - - -- - --- ____ ----_-•- --_.._._------ - - -. . CON,M �CF TRSP TFRC SIG SS$NH RD 21-4460-000-DO e MN CITY MGMT ASSN �ELSO!! RADIO CCNM fti�LSOM RADIO C�NM GECRGE nCACK NQRTHERN AUTOMOTIVc ANNUAL MBRSH� FEE 07-4404-1�0-10 R�NaTE FIRE TRANS 72-4630-OOD-O� 1 RE6IRzD OUTL ETT 7 2-4630-OOD-�fl 1 I�S ADJ 3HOS 83 09-4246-050-50 wIFER MdTQR 0]-4330-4�I3-70 3 CRLID GLMSTEAO I�S ADJ 3MOS 83 01-4245-Q20-20 TuF4 OLUND IAS AQJ 3MMOS 83 15-4245-060-60 FRED FFEIFF�R iNS AOJ 3MOS 83 01-4245-DSD-SQ ROGER PLATl� IAS ADJ 3MOS 83 D1-4245-020-�.,, MARIO REYcS pARIO RfYES ROAD R�SCU� INC CA4ID SOMP�I hICNOLAS UNDIS ED VA ILLANCOUftT VIKING EL�'CTRIC SPLY VIKING EI.ECTRIC SPLY IIIKING EL�CTRIC SPLY CITY I� ST PAUL R E 41}iITACRE &CC MILEAGE BURN S SCHL D'�-44� 5-020-2a MM�ALS BllRNS SCt1 D7-4490-020-20 CASTTT H=AD ASSMY Oi-4330-46D-30 3 30 DA INTERNSHIP EXP t3a-4130-710-i0 REF OVEkP1f1MT SWR AC 75-1150-Oi�U-DO INS ADJ 3MOS 83 SHOP LITE/FITTINGS SH�P LIiE/FI7TINGS SHGP LITE/FiTTINGS 83 DI SPATCHI AG SVC SEALMANHOLENENT(vKR 09-4245-020-20 09-4335-3�D-50 2. U]-4335-310-70 2 �5-4335-390-60 2 0'J-4275-020- 4 i2-4b30-000-OU >> . . . . ,. .,. _. ., ._,.. _.._.._. . _ . ...... . _. . . CHECK R�GISTER ►MqUNT VENLC� ITEM DESCRIPTION fiCCOUNT N0. I�V. $9..i39 # ..____.__..,___.__.__._.__�..._. -_-- --- _-- --. - - . ___ __ ._.. - --- -- . __._.....----_. _..__.�..._--- - -___. _.____ .. . �,009,70 �tii.�NSKr AUT� PARTS RPRSlFARTS tll-4330-�+bi�-30 i� 1,Oq9.70 * 240.00 POt,CN�.R �RTG 80N0 PRTG TA X ANTIC Oi-4226-7 �L1-10 240.�10 * ._. _ _..... - -. -- --• -. - ---_ .,._____ _ _._.._...---.--__. _. _ 73.9? PGIICE MAG CNE YR SUBSC fl�-44iJ�-02D-20 7 3.9�T � �s.00 ��� c tr�� ��e 3 5 . D O .*_ _-. - - -- - --- � --- -- 52:95 B&.� AGT� SPL�f t50.b2- B�,J__AU7 C SP LY ---._.. ..__.--• - - - - 9�.f32 E&J AUi'C Sf'LY 2i7.'SO BRJ AUTC SPLIf 30.b5 * ?30.001 23Q.OQ * 40.�5 4.10 49.$5 * ED �!A T�.R COMMI•SSiOiV _ -. CAR?ER SOB FORD ZNC CAR'fER Bt!3 FCRD INC 68.40 CHAPIA PUBL.ISHII�!G CO 68.4p * 30.70 CITY 1�0?CR SUPPLY '�4,9�3 CITY MQTfl#� SUPPI�I 82,98 CITY MqTOR St;PPLY '12 E .6 6 �+� 3.3� CCAST 70 C�AST 35.3? CCAST 7fl Ct}AST 38.70 * - _ __. a�� c ���r� - ---- -- ----- .I 8aT7'ERY __.._....._._._ _..� BATTERY REiN MI SC� PAR TS MISC PARiS RINK FLOqDING HTR Ct�RE L� AS 0�-433_ti-45C?-20 8. ili-433{�-440-ZO 0! 01-433�1-4�0-_2D _�( {j�-4330=�b0-30 Of O1-4330-4.90-�0 Ot D'I-4425-470-7Q 2�; - - -• -. --. 01-433U-440_-20._.g;`. 07-4330-44t]-2i3 8�`. PUBLISH AJ F GR B ID _..__. ,�79-4Z40-802-OU 3�4 DISC PADS/AC OGI�I3VION BA7TIBULHS SNARPcNING �iAIN DANCE 1-433U-44p•20 1�7 _ D1-433ti-4bi3-30,_i � �-4330-49q-50 i�� -433p-49Q-70 37 . -4330-490-7Q 3;7 77.56 CCPY_ _E�iUI�' CC .._ BLUELINE ..--- _. ....----..�..,_. __,...5-4,300�-t05.-15_51 � , CHECK REGISTFR QM�UfvT VENQCr2 ITEM DESC�2IPTi0N 7i.Sfi * 25.15 CAVZS �LECTRCNIC SUG 2t?.�U GAVIS ELECi'RONIC SUC 45.1 S * '��7b2.50 DCR C�RP. �!l�owoQ ac� c�ii��• 2,��z.so * ' 9p.0U DENNIS QE�MONT 90.DQ * 6�.52 KAR PRODUCTS INC. b1 «5� KAR P FCDUCTS INC. 61.52 KAF PP.QDUCTS IAC, 6'1.52 KAP ?ROf3UCTS I�4C. 61.52 KAR_PRODUCTS INC. 3D7.59 * 34.20 KAT K�YS 34.20 * 2Z.22 KI�HEI EDWARC 1.1D KI.�.Hc�. �D4lARC! 1,32 K7SNEi fDi�ARt3 7.92 KI �H� L �`DI�ARD 32.S+S * 'lZ.32 Kt�i37H TOM .�3$ KNUTH TOM 4.62 KitiliTH TOM 9.b8 Kht,TH TGM ! .7b K NtiTN fi{7M . i8.7b KNUTH tON 2:2U N ttUT�i_ T Ct� 44.T2 * 8.T4 KU��A�OER GUY G�� ACCpUNT N0. Ih �PRtPAR7S 03-4330-45ii-30 RPR Di-433tf-45a-30 APR RENt 13�-420t?-b�D-i0 APR RENT OS-4200-6�1�• 1 S APR M I 01-44'f 5-02'# • 2D MI � C PARTS NISC PAkTS l�icC PARTS MfISC i'ARTS rs z sc �a� �s 0�-430 5-020- 2U 0�-4305-030-3� [11-4305-05�-50 " 01-4305-070-70 � 5-4305-QGC ! PAD �OCKS 01l-43U5-07D-7D MAR M� NAi� Mi NAR MI MAR MI NAR Mi MAR Mi NAf� NtI N A R M �i MAR MI MAR MI NAR MI NAR MI 05- 441 5-105- � 5 37-4b� 5-908-OD 62-4k15-936-Ot� _ _._ _ _ �4-443 5-802-DO OS-44i 5-105-'1 S �0-44i 5-944-t10 7l-4415-945-00 79-44'i 5-802-00 84- 44� S-$Q9-Dfl $5-44i S-81t?-00 85-4415-870-00 QS-441 5-105-'! S �NOUNT �.94 i 4.b8 * z�.za 27.2C1 * CHECK REGISTER V�NCCR ITEM DESCRIPTION KULLAAOER GtIY l�AR MI LaKELANO FORD RPR DOOR 2295 135.Q0 LFIS APR UD i35.OQ # A92.Q5 M&1� INC CANON PROD 7CN�RlMTCtU 47.7S M&�t IfiC CANON PR�D T�NERIMTCN 57.30 M&W I�C CI�NON �ROD TGN�.R/MTCiV 12.05 �&ii Il+C �ARfON P�0[} TC1e�RI�TCN 9.i�S N&4i ING CANON �R00 TONER/MTCN �,�s. ._ . i���i-i�c �A�oiv x�oa __._ ___-�r����r�s�c�i� 6.1$ 1►&6' I�C CAN�JN PROD TCNER/MTCN �4(3.25 M&� INC CANQN �'QOD Ti1NERlMTCN 6.00 �&W I�C CdNON FRDO TONERlMTCN 6.19 N&4i ?(�C CANON FROD TGNER/lNYCN 27.713 M&3� I�C CA�ION �RflO TtNcRlMTCN 502.7i1.. *. _ ._ _._._.. , - -- .--- - �5.00 NE(1C #=GTS RUB�ISH MAR SVC � 5.00 * 2,SSD.00 25.St1— 2Q�901.27 23•425.77 : 35,95 35.95 * 9�.OD i7.00 * Mr TRO �JA�T� Cf?NTR�L MAfl SAC CHGS N�TRO �tASTE CONTR�L tX ADMIA� F�E MtTRO �IASYE CONTRqL _ ___ _AQR INS7ALLM`NT.. MINN E�AEFIT ASSN APR PREM MINN fIRE ZNC SFRG BRAGK�1`� �85.Ofi 1ti0R�H�•RN ST POidER CO MAR SUC a7/,.28 kC�THERN ST PL�MER CO MAR SUC 'lT4.2'� i�^FTHERlV Si POI.Eft CO HAR 51JC ACCOUN? NO« I AU g�-��� �-so�-oa 32-4630—OUO—OI 01-2075-D00-01 [?1-4240—+510—'l.04 �t 01-4200-61D-20 ,ii , Oi-42U0-610-3(3 11 t3�-42[30-6�D-8Ci �t 07-�4300-04Q-4t1 1t ... f_. 0'f-43�t3—(?SQ— 50 1� . 01-430[�-070-70 �I . t15-42Q0—b30—'f 5 1t . 7 0-430U-000-00 11 75-43D0—Q60-6i1 '!{ . 23-43{30-000-fl0 1t 01-4280-3�5-30 2: -- - . _ _._�---_r.. ... � 07-444$-7 )p•�0 � '! 5-3320—t}tlfi—Q(3 �7_5-4449-060.-60 1�' �1-2074-000-00 9-43QS-030•30 2�: i-421 '1-300—SO 9-4211-31D—SU I-4211-3'�fl-7G . � ANt3URT 46.4�4 265.23 2'1b.76 808 .96 �508.95 738.25 157.0� �-��.z� 239.� 2 8Q8.96 4, 945.02 * 294.9'f �3s�� ��t.so 73.35 260.� U 45.b4 63.1�1� �k3.$5 i � 254.24 * Z45 .00 7 45.00 390.00 * 3.5Q 1i.Z5 12.35 27.10 + 144.b3 �49,b3 * 13.6D 13.b0 * ��.oa �s.00 = 1 � 3�O.OD �, CNEGK REGISTER �t�t�GC� ttiORTH£�iN ST Pt3i�ER C4 _ f►ilf,cTHERN_ ST_ P01�IER_ CO I�OFTHE�h 5T PL14tER CO AORTHcRN ST P�WtR CO A(lRTH�RN ST POWER CO 1�`GRTHERN� ST PO�+ER CO . At'RTH£RIV ST POi+ER CO NOE�Tt#ERft ST Pt2i3ER CO t�CRI'HERA ST PCid£R C� AflRTHEftN 5T PQiiER CO .. 11-CRTH�+£ST�RN Bt�,t_ ._- - NOR7H�i�STERiV 8�f.1 i�{3RTHkEST�RN BEl.I A CRTF! f�ESTE'� N SEI.L NflFTHkESTE'R�1 �ELL NOR7H kEST�'RN BEI.L lVC�THl�EST�EtN �EL.L 11CRTHi�ESTc`RN B�LL CAK �REST K�yN�'LS CAK CREST K�.NNELS c�x X�� n s�� vI c� c� tJXYGER SERUZCc. Cf1 CXYG�'!� ScRVZ CE CQ Flt�t BEND PAN:NG IhC SB,T O.FFICE �'ROD �EIAN DER 1?UA t�E C SH AUG HNES SY L� JR iTEM DESCRIPTION MAR S VC _ r�a� svc __ . MAR SUC MAR SVC MA R S UC Mi� R S VC NAR SUC MAR SUC _, MAR SUC MkR SUC MA R S VC MA R S VC r�AR suc l�AR SVC HA R S 11C MA R S VC _ _ NA R S UC h�A fi S VC M�R R£TCC/CA�l.S MAR B OARQ fl��u��a�� [?L�MURRAGt CYi.S �A s� IN/OUT BOARp AFR I MI MAR T�ME • , , , ACCOUiUT N0. INt tit-42i 'i-31 G Oi-428 'l-32fl-7i! . _. 01-427 3-42Q-5Q 01-42a 2-3!(l•5"t? 01-42i 2-3'f0-7Q 01-»�212-315-3�3 [17-42i 2-320-70 15-42i1-31D-b0 _� . 15-42'i 9=40D=6iI '#5-42� �-3��i-60 D1-42i 0-02D-20 0�-4210-030-3i3 t�1-42f 0-OSO-50 09-4210-i3�t3-7t3 Oa-421Q-�10-#0 D'f-42� 0-3�5-3Q OS-4210-'105-'15 �5-4�] 0-060-b0 o�-�zz�-�fla� _ o 0�-4225-8i?D-90 Ci�-�3€#5-030-3fl. 07-43f�S-030-3D i?1-43QS-QSD=S{3 o�-��z2-oso-�� 05-4300-1 OS-15 i1�-441 5-200-7i3 0'�-4220-7 32- 10 CNECK REGISTER �HOUNT V�NOt�R iTEM DESCRZPTION b75.00 SHAUGHNE55Y L E JR TZME R� 7AX ANTiCIP ♦0#S.Ofl * 7.38 SNYDER DRE3G STCRES 7,38 * 15.19 34.58 f09.77 * 2� 39� ,99 i � 104.44 48 4.99 1b.44 50.Ot� 143.8Q 10�.52 ?14.79 ZS3.74 b3.b0 98G.37 *� SOUTH�IEW CHEURGLE7 �al:TMbIEW CHEVRCLET S7 TREAS P�£RA ST TREAS �ERA �T TREAS P�RA _ __ �T TREAS PERA ST TREAS PERA S7 TREAS �ERA Si TREAS P£RA ST TREAS PERA ST 7REAS PERA ST TREAS PERA PHQTO FIhISHiNG MI�C PAR7S 222'� MI�C PARTS 222� � PERA 1�1H P tE 313 8 �'ERA 3/25 �PR P£RA 3!S PR PERA_ 3125 PR _ _ f�ERA 3/25 PR ' PERA 3I25 PR P�fiCA 3125 F'R PcRA 32l25 �R PERA 3/ZS PR __ _flERA 3l25 PR 2,034.67 �T TREAS SS COPt FllM1,O MAR FiCA t�/N 59.75 _-•--_. ._ ST 7RcAS SS CGN FUitiO _ M�R F�CiI CflNt'R _.., �"f23.55� ST 7R�AS SS CC*�1 FUND NkR FICA Ct3�iTR 4�2.1 2 ST TR EAS SS C0�1 �'UND MAR F ICA CON Tr� 259.50 ST TREAS SS CON �U�D HAR FICA CON7R 337.87 ST TREAS SS CCN FU�D MAR FiCA CGN]'R b2b.4p S7 TREAS SS CON FUND MAR FICA CONTR 15�►,.98 �T TREAS SS CON FUi�D MAR FICA CCI�ITR 4, (lb9 .34« * " - - -� -- � 2F31 .20 372.4fl b53.50� # � 2t5,72 26.72 # ST PA U� DI SP ATCH ST PAI:L LiSPATCH SUtti NEi�SPAPcRS i?.�0 �UNIFORMS tJN�.IMI7ED 5.95 tlNIFORMS U'V�INIT£D NOTPUBHRG RE LINYI NCTPUBHRG UNIT P�tTP AD FtIR BIt?S 8Z-2 RED LENSE SNAP GN Nt+E B ARS ACCOUhiT N0. zNV (11-4226-i "10-'I 0 0'Q-4305-020-20 09-433�J-44Q-2Q fl'�-�433fl-y�0-2Q 4i-2fl62-OOO�Ot� 41-4406-Q20-20 0�-440G-Q2l-2Q 01-4406-03D-30 0]-4�►06-04D•40 Oi-4�.06-OSD-�0 {}i-4�06-D7�- 7t� D'l-44i�b-110-'f 0 i?5-440 b-'1 OS-i 5 15-44Q6-06D-b0 01--2063-flOD-00 D1-�.408-021-20 n�-44Q8-(}40-40 D'� -4408-0 5U-5 0 Q'f -4408-t17Q-70 i7! -4408-110-'10 OS-4408-7 OS•'� 5 1 �-4408-Ob0-60 21-4240-QOQ-Qfl 21-424�-OOQ-00 9- 424 0-8D2- DO � � 7-4330-460-30 5 ;«-4490-030-3t! _` . � t•• ; . � CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VE�Df,R ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. I�V, i 8.� 0 UNZFORMS UNL IMI TEO EUTTONS/STRI PES 01-449D-03Q `. 4a.95 * . 125.00 925.00 * 60.00 60,00 120.00 * 113.36 250.D0 5�.71 i20.D� 57.71 120.00 7'�8.78 * 91 .52 45.26 24.8b 24.85 i?3G»50 * 84.Fi6 84.86 * 54.911.02 �, 628.44 4.00 2�577.73 22�969.T1 4,8�3.60 27.70 741.10 1 .32 .8$ 4.h2 7'12.72 5,94 '1 . 7 6 20,46 88,895.OD •r., i. � � UNITE�3 f�AY-ST PAUI UA! IU OF MINN UNIV OF HINN uASH AATIdNAL IhS CO kASH 1�ATIONAL IAS CO I,ASH AATIO�IAL I�S CO _.kASH_AATIONQL I_IuS CO__ 1�ASH (tiATIONAL IAS CO �ASH h1�Ti0NAL IhS CO kELLS FARG+J TRU�T�E i�ELtS FARGO TRUSTEE Y�LLS FARGO TRUSTE� 41ELLS FARGO TRUSTEE ZIEGL�R INC FUNC 09 TOTAI FUNC �5 TCTAI FUND 1U TOTAL FUND �2 TOTAL FUNC 15 TOTA� FUNC 21 TCTAL 'FUNC 23 TOTAL FUNC 37 TOTAL FUNC 62 TOTAL FUN C 70 TO TAL FUND 71 TOTAL FUNC 79 TOTAL FUNC fi3 TOTAL fUNC 84 TdTAL FUNC 85 TOTAL TCTA� APR C ONTR iJKSHP REGR T KNUTht NKSHP G KULLANDcR APR INS W/!i APR PRcM AFR PREM At=R PR�M_ APi2 PREN1 APR PR£M APR LTO/L kl/H AP R P R�F9 APR P�EM A�R PREM TiRES 301 fll-2U70-Di�D-DO DS-44Dfl-! OS-'J 5 i OS-440�-105-15 � 0�-20T4-Dii0-00 7 Oi-4245-02D-20 7 0�-4245-D2�-2U 7 _ 0l-4245-040-4D 7 �1-4245-050-SO 7 OS-4245-105-'!5 7 D1-2�79-DOD• 1 fl)-4246-D20-20 9 D�-424 6-OSD- 50 1 fl1-4246-07D-70 � fl�-433D-490-50 � ��.. r ....... . .. .r-a.�� .- .v. . ...�...�.-.�+--r•�1....�..r,.. ..�... .�.w.- ..� .. ., .. i0237 847. 75 St Ca Credit Union PR Ded, _3 18_ _____,__,__ __ ,_.___.._�,._ ._. ___.._ --- --- --- --. _. ._. _ .._._. _ P ___ __ _- -- ---. . _..__ __. ./__-- -------_- 10238 200.00 Dakota Cty St Bank " 10239 4,279.37 Dir Int Revenue FIT W/H 3/18 10240 4,558.38 Comm Revenue Mar SIT W/H 10241 18,217.42 City Mh PR Acct Net Payroll 3/18 10242 240.00 Dakota Cty ATVI Regr Computer for small busin ss 10243 23,809.38 Amer Natl._Bank__ _, Interest/fee_.1981_ Tem�_I_. Bd.s_ _ . ..._ ._._ ._. ._. _ ._.. 52,152.30 _ __ _-- - - -- . _.. - �-- - - --- ._ __ --- - ___.��..----._ -- •----- - - - GR � y 141,047.30 - -- - � - - - � --- _ .. _ . _ . . . , _ ._. _ _ , �1 � CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL - APRIL STH, 19831 Corrigere Construction Company Concrete License Northwest Service Station Equipment Co. Excavating License James Peters Excavating Excavating License Scherff, Inc. Excavating License Cal-Mech Gas Piping License Master Heating & Cooling Gas Piping License Blix Construction Company Gas Piping License Crist Construction, Inc. General Contractor's Lic Dennis Greger Construction General Contractor'� Lic Quality Exteriors, Inc. General Contractor's Lic A-ABC Appliance & Heating Company Heating and Air Conditio Master Heating & Cooling Heating and Air Conditio 1983 3.2 NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR ON/OFF SALE LICENSES Country Club Market, Inc. Par 3 Golf, Inc. Tom Thumb No. 563 Off Sale License On Sale License Off Sale License se se License License CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Aoril 1; lp8' Dear �tayor, �ity Council I!em�ers an� Citf Ad�inistratar, nepres�ntative Seaher; wi11 be at�en�in� a meetin� o yatxr ci�y cau�cil this mon�h an� it is ap�ra�riate to ;ive }=a an up- da�e o� curren� and nendinU le�is?ative issues. T�p�� a e several. �ills in grocess , so�e o� c•r?�:ic� s�ou�.� hc� s�.zpoor e� a-��? ot?>ers wrich would have adverse irn�ac� on t`:e cities. Pl�ase voice yaur concern to Representatzve Sea�er� c�n any or all of �he �ollowin�: • � Local �overn�e�t Aid. riscussions ar� still continuing it'^i-� the Lea�ue an the Le�i.slaturn. ���eetin�s are �ein� �:el�i `�y em�ers o� t�:e ?�:e�ro Losers Grou�, the Association a£ ��:ta11 �iti,es, :�iinneanolis, �31ao�ni:��tort and ot'-;ers . "_'he I.eaaue will cantinue to adv' se you af possible ef�ects o£ the various proposais. Zo�al :zovez~�:�tertt Ai.� SF 753 �aould chan�e the �istri%uti oca �avernment ai to cities. 'I'ris bill is snonsored Associatio�z of Sma3.l �'ities an� the "�etro T_asers' Group knawn as the 20-50-50 plan. ^ach city wauld recaive °20 capz.ta. valf af the rernai:zing a�out�t would ;o to the ci based an per capita assessed valuation and t!:e rest woul a mill rate basis--gopulation ti�nes averaoe equalized �i ?�iinneapolis and Rloomingtan have subrnitted or wil.l s containi:�� a for:nula revision, '�'�';� uovernor' s praposal ooin, chan;e and the I.ea�ue is not fir:nly behi-�d a speci forrnula as of this date. The cornpanion issue, Ievy 2imi alsa u:��er scrutiny and any f�elings you t�+ave a�:aut chan deleting or Zeaving the levy ].i�it as is, shauld be ca�.� Local Q*�tian �Iatel-Mot�l "'ax �x?' f��Q wau? d a1.1ow any city o i�posin; a tax on t e �ross receia�s. `°inety-£ive pe the prace�ds would be use� to pro:nate touris�:t. "!"t�e six wha �Zr�ady have t�:e �oG�er to i�� pose ��:e tax woul:i ded�c of the revenues to �romote tourism. 'I're ? ea;ue �eels t'� places Ie;islative control over what s�ould he a city fu and allows no say in C�:e use a� r�venues. I 1 of � the d zs er es be on rate, bmit bi� ls s under- ic s, is ing, nted upon. the op�io� cent of ities t e 'i'?°' s bill ction Su er-£un3 bi11. S� 2?_0, Tj:' 76 I.eaves Ghe city expos�� to jait ia ility arisin� out o � azarr'ous waste lao� suits and wh�ich exceed Che insurance covera�e. The Lea�ue sup�orts limiteC lia�ilit} or i:amuni.ty as the cities are r��uireC to provi.de �his necessary service. FuSlic r:n�lavee L'ill t?�' 74? wou13 re�efi:�e pu�lic e�ployp"e to inc u e t::ase seasana er�olo}�ees who wor'.: 3Q or rnare days in a calendar year. Tl:is :�eans that a11 su.-:�^�er caor'- ers ;�ou13 e in- cluc:ed i:� collective �ar�ainin; a;ree�ents, sis-�i£icanti raisin� � � � Z city costs. Tre bilt would also redefine t�e term supervisar and t�e eff�ct woul� �e t�at the ci�y rnana�er is th� only suner- vi.sor. In aCdi�ion, aII city e�npla�ees, w�ett�er txnion �r not, coul� refuse to cross the }�icke� line. "':�:� ar�itratox's �iecision woui � take �recedence over city or��.:�ances, char.ters ar resolutians ne�atin� t::e ?:asic powers, �uties a�3 r�s�onsiSilities o� �!-+e city council. Stat� T icensin� af �'o-�tractors SF Il? � wou? :� re�{�aire ��:e fb�„missioner a� Go:-a.-nerce to icense a���il�?in� co:��ractars and raoul� pre-e:�c�t cities fro:;z er�acti��; l�cal. lic��si:t� or-�i-�a*�ces. ""!�.e city *.�ot�Ia _ i;e arnhi'�z.te� `ro:�t issuin� a huil�'i:�� ne�i* to an unlic�ns�d coztractor. � ''_'�:e -!'.ea�ue �otes that t�-:e bill wi2? not a�?equatel5� �rotect consu.-:�ezs a.*�d. wau? c� rrs:�r.ict sn�sL? �;ui? ���rs and c�Titr�ctoxs. �':a:�y cities a�rQa�y 1ic�:�se ca�tracto�s a:�� t�:�ir or�ina*�c�s are set at a leve? satis�actorJ to tk:e cit; . "'?�:e cit;� woul�? not �e aS1e to fi�anc� t?-<e izspectian �rogra:� o��:er t'�a-+ trrau�'- per�it �ees or ;e�eral revenues. 'T't^e cost to set u� the �ro�ra� taoul� co�ie out of t�:e corsu:ner's �oc'.cet, �ivin� ?�i.n i�t erfect o�e--'�alf t!-+e nrot�ctio� at twice th� cast. �urt�.er, enforce:n�nt o� the hil.I is not a�dressed Ly t�?e biI? . T.':�e Gaa� Sar.iaritan Bi1Z i�'? 3°�` would protnct t�ase aho �ive � emeroency care at t.e scer.�� an accide*�t. This would �rotec� from Iiability the a�a�ulance, rescue, fire an� pa?ice volunteers. I hop� there will be a Uaod aYchan�;e o� i��as a�a tha� ?'.epxesentativ� Seaber; i.rill knoT�a �ahere yaur corn;�unity �riorities Iie. I'� Ioakin; forcvard to your C0�1:1C11 neetir�a. m Sinc�r�ly, . �1 ` ��- �i�' l�.�irt ' Lea�,ue T�e�islative Coardinator � V�A. L,ang �a INSURANCE 2pt HANOVER $UIL4ING • 48Q CEDAR STREET SAiNT PAUL. MINN 55101 •(872} 227-8951 � Marck� 15, 1983 Mr. Orvil Ja��nsan City Admi.nistrator City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Neigh�s, Minnesata 55120 Dear 4rV i 1 : RE: LEAGUE OF MINNES�JTA CTTIES 1982 k[ORKE.R'S COMPENSATION DIVIDEND r�� i {�? �. � r��� I am pleased ta enclose a check in the amaunt of 6 257.00 issued d, League of �9innesota Cities Insurance Trust Worker`s Compensation Ac This represents the Ci.ty's diVidend for the calendar year of;1982. � You also wi�11 find a Release fram the League of Minnesota Cities wi i.nformation to the dividend., Wtth. ki;ndest regards. Very truly yours, W, A, LANG C0. �� R. B. F1 ei schhacker Vi:ce. Pres%dent �: . Enclasut^e f 1%a7��: .�« L M C L��� r or� r e v� r.s e s�`�r. the unt. h background rtarch 7, 1983 T0: FRO�S : league of minnesota cities City Officials and Insurance Agents League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust Board of Directors - Bonn:i.e Carlson, Finance Dir�ctor, Chaska Lee Radermacher, City Council, Mir.netonlca Sig Stene, Mayor, Lindstrom Pat Bonniwell, City Administrator, Dassell Don Slater, Executive Director, I,eague of. rtinnesota Cities RE: 1982 idorkers Compensation Dividend A check for each participating city's share of the dividend from the LMCIT workers compensation program for 1982 is bei.ng sent to the city's insurance agen�. The total amount being returned to cities is 20% of the earned premium for 1982 -- over $700,000. Combined with the initial discount each city received, LrICIT has saved its 285 participants nearly $1.�► milli_on for 1982. As was done in previous years, the dividend payment for individual cities was calculated according to a formula which takes into account both the size of the city's premium and the loss experience of the individual city. Specifically; one-third of the dividend is allocated among participants proportionate to the city's premium, and two-thirds is allocated based on the loss e�perience of the individual city. Based on this formula, individual cities' dividends ranged fro� a minimum of 6.67% of premium in a city whose losses and exper.ses e�ceed their pr6'??!�U.II1s to abo>>t 24% of premium if a city had no losses at all. The dividend was calculated based on experience from January 1 through December 31, 1982, Citie.s who entered the prograni during the year received a.pro rata dividend based on the number of. months they participated during 1981. Since each participant received an initial discount of 18%, the dividend means that each participarit saved at a minimum nearly ane-fourth of their workers' compensation costs. I'or cities whose loss experience was good, the total savings are much higher. This marks the third consecutive year in which the LMCIT �rorkers compensation program has returned a substantial dividend to its members, in addition to a sub- st��ntial initial discount. We feel that the success of Cliis program demonsCrates what can be accomplished when c�.ties cooperate to address their insurance needs and we look for�oard to continued success in the coming years. PT : gl.b 'I 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 O'I •f6'I 2l 22�-5C00 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: City Council FROM; Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Opticom April l, 1983 The Claims List included within your agenda packet includes p yment of a$4,240 billing from Mn/DOT for the installation of Opticom at the intersection of T.H. 55 and Mendota Heights Road. While the optic m has always been addressed as an "Equipment Certificate" expenditure, w have taken a different approach in expensing the system at this particu ar lo� cation. Since the signal is located within the industrial area and si ce the _ Industrial Revenue Fund has a very substantial fund balance, we fe t the billing could very properly be expensed against the fund. Little f the money we have received from Industrial Revenue Fees has been expen ed. The opticom device will benefit the industrial area and it seems t us that it would be appropriate to support the cost via industrial re enue fees sulxnitted by industrial firms in the district. ! We recommend that you support this funding approach and aut the expenditure via the Industrial Revenue Fund. =ize � t1��NNE�Tq � ZO � a f- � ��rOF TRPa�� Minnesota Department of Transportation Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Office of Commissioner March 14, 1983 Orvil J. Johnson City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 Dear Mr. Johnson: Thank you for your recent resolution supporting completion Mendota Interchange project. Proposed legislation (first File 60, then House File 371i) designated specific routes f improvements with proposed highway bonding authorizations. the proposed highway funding legislation has been amended references to highway projects have been deleted. Also, t of highway bonding has been reduced in favor of increased taxes. �r1�.'i, ������3 ) 296-3000 of the louse �r Currently, �nd specific �e amount iotor fuel At this time, I do not know what we can �or will be able to fund. No decisions have been made on highway bonding, gas tax in reases or statewide priorities for .highway projects. I will ask he District Nine Office in Oakdale to keep you informed of any new dev lopments. Your city's interest and support for highway funding is ap reciated. Sincerely, Richard P. Braun Commissioner An Equa/ Opportunity Employer Minnesota House of Representa March 22, 1983 Mr. Orvi1 J. Johnson City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 750 So. Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Mn. 55120 Dear Mr. Johnson: 0 t�,'^:� ,� � N . �� ry`�� Thank you for your letter and resolution advising s of your concerns regarding the intersection at T.H. 1" , T.H. 55 and T.H. 110. As a resident of Dakota County and a frequent user intersection, I wholeheartedly concur with you tha one that is much deserving of some attention. I w following up with Mn/DOT to obtain status reports see if there isn't something we can do to encourag action. As you may know, H.F. 60 has changed,quit tically since you took action to adopt your resolu The gas tax bill which has now become H.F. 371 no tains a specific project list of priority projects state of Minnesota. We do not anticipate that suc ing will receive serious consideration for this se We are, however, quite confident that the gas tax pass, which will provide substantial increas es in Mn/DOT for major road construction throughout the From your perspective I would think that the elimi the specific project list should be considered a p the project that you have in mind. Now that Mn/DO tied to a specific list of proj ects you have some present your case for the need for these improveme the priority it should receive. As soon as I have more informat ion regarding the s1 this project, I will be in touch with you. In the time, feel free to give me a call if I can be of a� ance to you in pr esenting your case. SL/ml Sincerely, teve Loeding Committee Administrator House Transportation Co� of this it is 11 be nd to earlier dras- ion. onger con- in the a list- sion. ill will oney to tate. ation of us for is not oom to ts and atus of mean- y assist- Iiimit tee �� 0 t CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO �1arch 29, 1983 T0: City Council FROM: Edward F. Kishel City Engineer SUBJECT: Bid Opening P�.A.C. Property and Adjacent Areas Improvement 82 Project 2 Job No. 8202 The attached Resolution indicates the result of bids for the above project which were received on Thursday, March 24, 1983. The low bid is approximately 19 percent below the Engineer's Estim te and is being recommended for award. In explaining the difference between the estimate and the low bid, we sug- gest that the estimate was prepared early in February without the enefit of knowing what the competition might be like. Staff recommends that the resolution be adopted, awarding a contra t to Orfei and Sons, Inc. of Saint Paul in the amount of $259,078.06 � City of P4endota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. 83- RESOLl1TI0N ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STREET AND STORh1 SEWER IMPROVEP1ENTS TO SERVE THE METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION PROPERTY AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT N0. 82, PROJECT N0. 2) WHEREAS, pursuan.t to an advertisement for bids for the proposed co struction of sanitary and storm sewer, water and street, curb and gutter im rovements to serve the Metopolitan Airports Commission property and adjacen areas (which improvements have heretofore been known and designated as I provement No. 82, Project No. 2), bids were received, opened and tabul'ated according to law and the following bids were received complying with said adivertisement: NAME OF BIDDER Orfei & Sons, Inc. Saint Paul, Minnesota Austin P. Keller Construction Co., Inc. Saint Paul, Minnesota Arcon Construction Mora, Minnesota Encon Utilities Burnsville, Minnesota Richard Knutson, Inc. Burnsville, Minnesota Robert W. Moore Company Saint Paul, Minnesota F.F. Jedlicki, Inc. Eden Prairie, Minnesota Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. Osseo, Minnesota OPUS Corporation Eagan, Minnesota and AMOUNT OF Bl $259,078.06 $298,058.00 $305,162.76 �310,615.50 $317,189.81 � $332,334.00 $334,511.00 $336,908.50 $347 , 68�L . 90 WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommended that the low bid submitted Sons, Inc. of Saint Paul, Minnesota, be accepted. Orfei & NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, P�innesota, as follows: 1) That the bid of Orfei & Sons, Inc. of Saint Paul, P�innesota, submitted for the construction of the above described improvements be and the same is hereby accepted. 2) That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver any and all contracts and documents necessary to consummate the awarding of said bids. Adopted by the City Council of the City of P9endota Heights this 5th day of April, 1983. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen P�. Swanson City Clerk NOTTCE QF PUBI.IC HEARING QN A PROPQSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PRpJECT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notzce a.s hereby given that the City Council of the Gity oi Mei Heights will meet at i:30 a'clock P.M. on Tuesday, April 5, 19$3, iz�, City Hall Council CLhambers, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights; esoGa, to consider the proposal of Linvill Associates Company, that City ass3st i.n financi.ng a project hereinafter described by the issi of industrial development revenue bonds. Description of Project idota � the , Minn- the The acquisitian and constructian of an approximately 65,000 sq are foo� office warehouse to be located at the narthwest corner of the intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Northiand Drive in Mendota iiei�hts. The estimated principa2 amaunt of bonds ar other obligations to be finance this project is $2y750yQ00. Said bonds or other abligatians if and when issuad, will not c a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City except project and such bands or obligations will nat be a charge against general credit or taxing powers but are payable from sums to be pai to a revenue agreernent. � A draft copy of the proposed application to the Commissioner o Planning and Development, SCate of Minnesota, for approval af the p together with all attachments and exhibi.ts thereta, is available fo inspectian beginning March 14, 1983, from $:00 atclock a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the City Hall, ', At the time and place fixed for said public hearing, the City the City of Mendora Heights iaill give all persons wha apgear at the opportunity to express their views wa.th respect ta the propasal. Dated this 14th day of March, 19$3. {$Y ORDER 0�' THE CZTY �y Iffathleen M. Swanson Citp Clerk ;sued to .stiCute e� ' e Cityts pursuant Energy, ject, publ3c 'clock uncil of earing an NQTICE OF PUBLIC HEARTNG ON A PRQPOSAL FQR A COMMERCZAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN. Notice is hereby given that the City Council of �he Gity of M ndota Heights will meet at the City Council Chambers, 750 South Plaza Drive, Men ota Heights, Minnesota, at 7:45 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, April 5, 19$3, to cons der the proposal of the Northland Company, that the City assist in financi g a project hereinafter described by the issuance of commercial development re enue bonds. Descriptian of Project Project consists of the construction of three (3} office/ware �ause buildings with an aggregate square footage af approximately 100,000 squa e feet on approximately 8� acres of real estate located at the northeast carner of the intersection af Pi�ot Knob Road and Narthland Drive in the Cit . The estimated principal amount of bonds or other obligations w ich will be issued in one ar more series to finance this praJect is $5,000,000. Said bonds or other obligations, if and when issued, will nat onstitute a eharge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of fihe City and such onds or obligations will not be a charge against the City`s general credit r taxing powers but are payable from sums to be paid by the Narthland Compan pursuant to a revenue agreement. A draft capy of the proposed application to the Gommissioner o Energy, Planning and Development, State af Minnesata, for appraval of the p oject, �ogether with al1 attachments and exhibi�s thereto, is available fo public inspection from $:00 a.m. to 4:30 p,m., Monday through Fri@ay, at t e Ci�y Hall. At the time and place fixed for said public hearing, the City C uncil af the City of Mendota Heights will give a1I persons who appear at the earing an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. Dated this 10th day of March, I983. (BX QRDER QF THE CITY COUNCIL} By�������'�'� th2een M. Swanson City Clerk Case No. � -� � City of Mendota t�eights Dakota County, Minnesota APPLICATION FOR CONSTDFRATION of PLANNTNG REQUFST Date of Applicat on �-"�-�3 Fee Paid`� �� � /7 �j Applicant Name: A� ��� Last First Ini ial Address : I�gS �uh�r L�-. �f, ��I /�^ �.Sllc� Number and Street Owner rTame: SaW�. . Last First Address: Number and Street Street Location of Property in Question �uh�e� �-� V1'2� City ty State Zip Code i �elephon No. ys�-- ���.� � i �� yo / �s/�/�� i Ini ial �� State Zip Code � icyai ++c��tlr�tvtl Vl r1V�JCl l.y. — n � . . _ � _ , ' T�Tpe nf Request : I Rezor_ing Variance Conditional Use Fermi Subdivision Approval Plan Approval �Other (Specify) �.� � Yi87 l�� ,v�v�s ��.cc=�'F,e c.ou. �o� �us,� .� . a March 23, 1983 NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights will meet at 8:00 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, April 5, 1983, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Mr. Scott C. Van for a conditional use permit to place fill on property described as: Lot 3, Block 4, Sunview Hills This property is located east of Hunter Lane, north of Mallard Road. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed conditional use permit will be heard at this meeting. This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Ka.thleen M. Swanson City Clerk � � < . CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO T0: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director and Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer a March 17, 1983 SUBJECT: Case No. 83-08, Scott Van - Fill - Conditional Use Permi� Scott Van the owner of Lot 3, Block 4, Sunview Hills was noticed t be placing fill on his lot last summer. Scott was notified of the Cit 's requirement of a Conditional Use Permit when in excess of 400 cubi yards of fill is placed. Scott met with staff to discuss what pro ess was necessary and it was determined at that meeting that Scott had not exceeded the 400 cubic yard limit. Scott promised to cease fillin un- til he had a house plan completed. Subsequently to that time a la ger quantity of fill was placed. Scott contends his mother unaware of his agreement with the City allowed the Contractor from the Eagle Poin nroject to place additional fill on the lot. � Scott is now making an application "after the fact" for this�filli g. The filling was done to provide for a gentler driveway slope down o a drainage way in the center of his lot and then back up to his prop sed home. Scott has coordinated this fill with the Kegler lot to the outh to provide a smooth transition between those lots. Scott says he ill put a culvert under his drive if he has a gravel one or allow drai age to. go over his drive if he blacktops. Gravel driveways are no lon er permitted in Mendota Heights. Scott has constructed a retaining w 11 along his north property line that saves some existing trees. Alt ough a permit is not needed for retaining walls, Scott's looks of quest onable design. We find no problem with this proposal and subject to concurrance o neighbors, recommend approval. � the 0 PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: 22 February 1983 83-0£3 Scott Van East of Hunter Lane, North of Conditional Use Pexmit to Deno 1a11 ard �it Fill PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: l. Scott Van proposes to construct his house to the rear of hi.s lot (just north of Mr. Kegler's property). In this case the terrain of th Iot is such that the rear of the lot is approximately in line with t e Mathisrud existing home to the north and appears appropriate. 2. Mr. Van is applying for a Conditional Use Permit to deposit fill on the property in accordance with the plans which he has prepared. � We do not at this point in time have copies of this plan, though we are aw re that they are being prepared. _ 3. We discussed this proposal with the Public Works Director,,,and i appears that the proposal represents a reasonable way to handle this rat er difficult lot. 4. Fill has been deposited on portions of�the land contiguous to th street. • Additional fill is proposed so as to allow for the construction f a driveway on the north side of the lot to provide access to;the h mesite on the east end of the property. , �Gt+L�GK �:�v- vv�-vi MAfalG4N � �7'Ho:�ifi �•-". �6 T,�c�i.r,c9 /1�O.=.Ser-�„/ MYRTL� F. C30-Ot 020-f�! •, _ 0 os�_a1 052-01 3c �-n�: r',-�e� ,-'�..�.-� ���- � L�/%<►ve�-9 ��0-0� . zt.a7•� -•�3 .= ✓e ,�y, .� / o.a,,�, � � w i ,= /�'%10r! �.ya 24a7�^t3 �Go�3-O z�a�4 A-f � ]..?.c z6c73-.� ! ORCHA+'�.L� ROAP ��;,s3-� . _ ----� _ . �S- -- . 4 00 � !A � ~ lSF ~ iR ' �' 4„ r u N c.r 44 � : � ; azo•oa � �:� '`` ' ^ ' o�c-ae • ! � C � ��.e 7 � - v � ' . iQ 4 /?"i /'7? i C� L,. • .�/ �30-02 „�^� .S' wca�/%*s�,-a z... .s`s . e�i G'. i S s � . . C . „¢ '7S 2f.iC►8 t+'O 2 C32- 08 040-08 0 21- 0 2 ,wa s ' 2Ge�o-D 2 G oSo-a �sz.2s i-ra.z� , . �; q "'y,00 �$�' t�� ts �, �: � � � � � � :�4 4:�. � s s �., 326.58 O a. ., Kes�ie a� �e 0�0-02 ° �,/ � �Y�ro1d L. Po/�' d sv� r aaa ; 2 � P . . 3 < W A c• � "'�+ a • �. . i o �-u � 22$. �2. 2.zQ.33 zzs_, s PE'['£R d � _ . ._ . _�_ � � ' .�errr .4. �� NEN�.st - �, a� Oi0-OT ♦ CSO-Q2 /,�C• d70-C / ,f?G. � + .�j E/rrt�r A. ..5�1»�.a�t ^ 2bo .p 4�0-42 , � ,4c '': J.d'a..t i4G• � `� 2Go,go -� . o • '� _ m '" o � � ' y � 4 ! P ? Z4aat . : � � 020-03 E'//iari �__ •- --- - ''� ? " h - � �► Oori,� t7 � � y N e9 �e ai e � - � 010-03 IC W t'� a '�30-0 � o � a� . � �'`� "' J °' .:r�, _ ,a g ^ , a °' Q � _ _ _ � - - • . 4�,� 3z .so . . i"` � —� 3p4p�y^ —50� %+� .. _ •� �'44 nJ4�y{ yi �.N(1L � � J'. Z .� �� �sA,tJL f75.D0 . . r, L' Yi � � . • �efetRPN''( , i'I 'r:�. �p° OUTLq7 A c � G� � �FG' � G a n i ' � • . aao-as �' N � N � Z � //}� wt � w `iJ' l.rr%•'� I75 00 r+ � !F 2 �i.SO �y ''' �, � G E N Z 2 � ,� hT, C. A t�i E � � '� � qx.�3. . � ,20 - ,,g.s? ,. NC�RTH . � ` VERONlCA LA. � /��' 200� �..t � iz� � �oa ;F?.,3 � � � y � � � �, - � N� J �';DDiTf N � � , , � 1i II Z � N "' - �.,. ''� C m �� v hlaro�c `Z � a{ � � ~'� 'ono- 1 U t� �� G t�� `� yt0 �. � ' Q � 2Ge??—� J 1 ;: za4.9e : Vtt...tdAG� rs� tA�c�tt>aTA HEiC OTO-04 9�='�c. z,�a�g —c .. � .o� ' ' /Y2n ?: ` :9� S CASE NI7MBER: 83-08 � , ,-� � ,, z ,,.4 - APPLTCANT: 5cott Van 1 ACTIQN: Conditianal Ltse P�rmit , � � � t--{ j _, ' � � � �� �� ,�._�, � PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: 22 March 1983 83-08 ' Scott Van East of Hunter Lane, North of Conditional Use Permit to Dep Mallard sit Fill PLANNING CONSIDERATION: 1. D4r. Van proposes to construct his new house to the rear of his ot shown on the attached plan. You will note this property is directly orth of Mr. Kegler's property who has applied for and received permissi n to locate his house near the front of the propex'ty, setback 30 fee from Hunter Lane. 2. A copy of the site grading plan indicating the development of r. Kegler's property and Mr. Van's property has been submitted. Mr. Van is seeking a permit to deposit fill as'indicated by the revised contour li es on his property, You will note this fill extends easterly from Hunter Lane on the front portion of the land conforming to the contours indicated n Mr, Kegler's property to the south. 3. The subject then is the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit or the deposit of the fill, some of which has already been placed on t e land. As you know, the Zoning Ordinance prescribes the need for the i suance of a Conditional Use Permit if the fill to be deposited exceeds 40 cubic yards. The plans do nat indicate the total cubic yards to be d posited, and the Commission may wisli to ascertain this number with the a plicant. It would appear that if the�fill is deposited in accordance wit the plan submitted that no deleterious ir�pact on the property or drainag conditions should occur. � HD .�t_.nL,.t� G1-h •.�v. � ,,.�, MAC AN ' �j-�c2Mi __ � � �ca T,-��'/..r�cQ /i�r? -..�2rr`✓ MY. .'�.& 1 C30-0� U20-GI ,.� . r �, osi_ai o52•p1 ,� � �-.-,� >ar;�e� ,tr��•� �`Gr � L�.�i�.6E"�9 040-01 . : Z.GC74 -A3 wr:- rv�"i.SoyrJ ,30 26a'7�-� Zco�3-o -� zb 4 A-► I i+ 8 ��y _ i na73-A � �" ORCHA�.t�c► RoAt� ------ - ;r;'�3"'ri �tI ' , � � � 4 O !n "' �' %�C ~ tn � ' N 'y� + -� h 4y �^ � ; 02C�-Q8 ' +to Q- "' fl{C-OE � . � �'- �-"' � b�m rrr i�' L• �/ �30-02 ,� „S wc�/7so.-7 Z.,o ,s�s 3 s ss Q . .4G. 4 �d ,,qc., ZL� G8 Z"O x b e3z- aa oao-as ' a a �_ e 2 vrs � 2Go8o-� 24o8o-F. .� lsZz: l'Yl•za , , �3 a Q,f Oa o !71 �5 � : � � �' ' "' 2 6 4 atJ. O� 4 S i Q fJ , 3 26. 50 i1 4 4 HB9°IB �1'E �'�C-a2 u ° `�,% � f�'arr-Q/d L. 20/�' d w�' a �� 3 2 „� �, � . 3 . , „ .4 c. rt. , `�. - �, _ . . S O N � � 2z8.3'z. Zzst.33 2zg- � � o t��-r � R _. • - - ---- " ^- ,E's,x A. G�cr NFt�t,c . L, o? � OIO-OT � / f1G? //qG• 070- `�� Errr��r- .9. .Srr�..s� � oso_o2 , ,tic —i �4 p�, AG 26rtag0-D zGoBo-� - � , � � ' - 0 .,_��7 ._ ---- �—� y � � Ct� a j 2GCa} . ' � � 020-03 E///G� � K��+1 0 � � �t . a� O,�r. d `;, N 89° ie ai E � � � Oi0-C'3 d� �t a�' G30 t � r w " cj � � �1 �' x y r � �' o` � � tll �� � /`�i'f"'d/. �----� --• � K � � ��`0 i2 �N '0�0 •. 41 3z6.5p T . > � �� � Q _ ; � ., �a fvf'XCL'�R �� G ��,,+ � � _I p d.� ;�' t7s.0o `` Z �o Z Z .�; �,� �..��. � . R �. �v+ . � ' a u,e�Rr�wY z�.o� w �' �- 'pO OUT�OT A � : � 9` � • ,� o e� .s�. g G W � f._ �� , 040-Q5 � r ' L34.�jd N N 1 Z �� J wJ � � !�' � tG7• S � Ts ao � � �� n_ ja Z,aa.so � �, j� Y�t...+�p,�,�. aF tltErv�oTP. HE►� f �, � G E N Z� ;� a�o-oa AAi�� LA N E v- � M � qi.�3 �?%4 r9C. j�° Jf�.s� �� NaRTH ,. . � VERONlCA LA. z6O�� -� � � � 0 200� s iz� ti ,o� ;p h.�r3 „ : L' 9 �'. r v � . \ ( � 2 r� ' �� �'ADDIT! N 3 ;� i .. Y . i � -r � CASE NL7MBER: 83-08 ry 2 � ,o. • ixe „� ` :a .5 � T" ; L : < ?' „ < < " , APPLICAPIT: Scott Van � ' ACTION: Conditional Use Permit ; � � ; r � � }� _� ` � ,� , ��,._�� 1 , � , s .,,, ,,.,�: . � , , .. � ~ • , :' _ � , ' . � Case No. C7 � �•'jL � ..� 3 }..� * � :.� ,s:.h _ . . � ^ _ �s} .i:vt;�x��: 'µC�i. t . .. ' , • �',`v,'.3i�'�'M2.^nY.•• ' ir'lS ..y3,.�f' - � � �.�ii,.vT..4:f,"•w r'£*,��,;;" ':r=.ot}�`-_ ;'},M . %F;�?�x:. ,V#'��F� . _. ,. . �'xA � f', 'q,.....� . . ::} , �l, rx;a.:�. .ki,'i� {„r . �r �. -,�.�;'�:"k'�%-' � .:i���f' � ' +c. ♦ :✓:„ s r Li„ y'�,..": �•F ��i,.'„'7.e. %,:•�r,�:;.�x�,�r;:>,:..� �. 'r:,�,� - ,.. A' IGIiTSr' '+ Sza .,.,,, ,, .,.. �;;� � ,�3,�z.,.�. , �; ,4;>���G. � �;�:�'.�`�r i�'��. ?���,,;7���.'• a. CITY .OF MENDOT �HE '{ �• ,,.,, ,,.•� :,.. :: `a� % 3. �,�-,k,, 4 �•��'.;,.•;.,' t .S ' r". ..��.�e. ^ . . '!: ��� , +'. • �„< �, , ;� . �y,_ f..�: :'� ��� t�;t-._ :_,{� . �r=.�;t'�="'-;x:�� �e �4�: - Y:�: DAKOTA ' COUNTY MINNESOTA , �' . . . '�a;,s; ; �; . �. . , _;:�,- � 5,:; .,, � ,• � � �..r.: �:. _ ��:.;ri�� � s.+ '"�'�:•.^�#.�-��k?'=..3'xa•.:;��k,t�'�f .`:��;`t.. t� ,arr•':.y:i,.- . , . • . - ;'i::�`'u ,- x�,�'' , . �, , . • , y:1�� :,y•% �'S��4...f:�.:.' � • .: . aY.. . .a �'(..a;� .. '1.�'" � 'Y.t....Srv�;s' `�5 t i-r;r .�;%i"i; lf';,� �i+� • " • •', " y t . . . � . ' ` . " - . £ .+�c'%c. � t. Srqi' ~ �a�`:'�n'sq�� ;` .: ' ..x�t°'73 " �. F r ` .�`� xyl �� . ,�', ,:- �'v. ;'�.. •�. .`���:' �.s. .;����''. ��yAPPLICA�ION FOR-�.;CONSIDERA.TION F` :4`. , -.<,: '. .`' �ti' •�"y �we�p,J-- '1,�•.'� r. � Yt�. : •'.• ',;,.!':s.• ...•.c . S''C; -1r,".��, �+�,n• a * �.. �%�...,.,. `.;: ;:z:=rf ?'' :.t.�. .•:�r.1 :�7`t:a,, '�: r J �4.4LL.�i4:{.�`n..rX�;�,rs.,+...�_ , . �j�,�:" ��'' '''�_'ft;`� :7r..•':-::}` ;',�: - . :��. '�'�'°'--'�.s:a+{.�'�>�x.€. .5fig. ,„;: '�3 :i�' „�5,. , `��'-.k� . s�:�`:� ..r-,.,. /��+" :p^._:. t�.` ��?,s .us.. 1'' ,�:�._� Vi: r �..}�.`ir..::k�.: �Y..rt ..,4r. '4� ,.zR'•<` ,,�-� - ,w'' ��ti:,":'j#:`'i. l,;,Y°.`�]• .�%F t - , �„�.. R'� i � . < � �4'.c.%"., f� ;��, ` ;r. .�i'R�";r a.ti' ..f�;n r�Y^;�C.`: hc i*: ..;�"Y'' �,� rt •, 3r' , .+,�. �J'.,. �.;�• .;F;'.' ..�::ti. ,"yy' '''i`�1'?�.-t;.-�'rk'..qr':.:i;f�':., �� � '. . :.�.- :,� _ �,: �,,x .'Y�- `'� �=t` PLANNiNG"i2E UE ST� F:.�' _ :�i° ::r�'. •':.�' � "'i'a�, ',t"^ .�� . i� ..q� ...-r.'Y � r:k�; . t,: �' {. Q iFY�C.ir� R,� * ..• y N. %�",r � �1' ��Ltr.F.i A�S+ ' ` Y� � ' �'j,�e...r+xri-4 �.y3•;.',A:�,'`�r` 'h;�^;. '� :a .., t ' , � . , ri: ^ k . i.� .-a� s ;i " ' � �.�'}-,. :. . .� .. ". .., - . .. :Y': j r a ' 1'�.s.• �� J #-'t" A,�' Tt:.��Di.�A"'.�«J... ;"•�:�.ir•..E` .p: - ,i - � .�(�.�. ..- ;J.,: �� i}.:�•ti�"� ::5;.. .}.�Y"s's...: .l^t s..t�' !M1� -.7 � ' :A:n.... . .i���4� : ti^'^.i:y.i.`.s.�.* "'� .^k' . • 1 . .. . • • - :yyp' " a �' •R�' �.` : S`..� .. : , :; ,: . .;. ,� -�� . ,� . �� Date�ryof Applicat�ionF 3-8•1983 •> y :^ ' � .ir, � .•F.� ` -'.aa'. .: _. . ..�Z... ,�ti. t'' _ �. . :.' . . � + � F � } . ,;r.� '�. :�, ., . .' _ ii i`'` - _ •. ., *''r>'+�. , ,.. �`* 5.�.,�:.. "Fee�''Paiii $123:5U � 9slt� ". �:�3 /v'-j�-3 �Applicant ��,: . , . .. - . w... . , , . .. ,,.....� , :. r . . � _ ;,, ' Name; - F:renz ,. Mark��:�,�:�, �,;,:,.�.", wsi�M;:;r�� � .,4. '„;,....5, . < < , ., . . � � Last , �• ^ Address•3�k� Minnehaha Ave. Sa. Number & Street Telephane Number: 722'3956 Owner Name: Same � t ,' , Address: '� Number & Street _ __ _ First ' Mpls. . City irst City Street Location of Property in Questian: 1842 Rolling Green Curve, Mendota Heights,Mn, Initial. ' � Mn.. 55406 State _ Zip Initiai S ta te Legal Description of Property: Lot 11, Block 3, Rollong Green Subdivision, riendota Heigh�s, Mn. Type of RequesC: Rezoning I _ . . 1 _ _ �---.w,_"" Canditional Use Permit i Conditianal ilse Permit for P.t3.I?.'' rfinor Conditional Use Permit 5ubdivision Approval � Plan Approval � Wetlattds PermiG , W � Other Z ip � P���R � 0 �a�3 March 7, 1983 � Application for Wetlands- Permit The following numbered explanaCions are intended Co corespond to c nditions of Wetland ordinance as delineated on page 5 of same. , 1) Ownere �fark and Carol Frenz, 3213 D4innehaha Ave. So., Mpls. Mn. SS406 2) Legal Descriptions Lat 11, Block 3, Rolling Green; Atendota Hei ts, Din. Address� 1842 Rolling Gresn Curve, t4endota H ights, Nln. 3) Proposed construcCions Single family home with attactched garag and ground level deck. i 4) eredominan�t Exposed soilss Northerly 110 ft. of lot � silty san s Southerly 40 ft. of lot - sandy loam 5) Topographic mapt See attatched map , 6) Site plan: Attatched j 7� Site Design �lap: Attatched 8) Existing Drainage and Vegetations (:,enerally, drainage in the no th 30 ft. of lot is over the ground to the adjacent street. In the south 12 f t. of lot drainage is over the ground to the surface of the adjacent pon . Earth- work previously performed during subdivision development included rading in th� northerly 110 ft. of lot. The subdividers left a high ridge a shown on map which will be removed. Topsoil is absent from most of the lot. Vegetation consistr of mostZy weeds. �he southern 40ft. includes some grass ith weeds. 9) Time Yeriods Construction is anticipated to begin in the spring of 1983. Construction wi21 be completed fn L983. Landscaping is expected t be done in 1983. LO) Construction will be kept well back from the pond until the ff al grading, is done, just prior to placement of sod. We anticipate that approximately 475 cubic yards of soil will be mo eci on the site. Approximately 2S0 cubic yards of ton soil will be brought in PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 22 March 1983 83-14 biark J. Frenz South of Rolling Green Curi/.e� Ponding Area on the South Approval of Wetlands Permit 1. The location of the property is indicated on the attached sketch north of the ponding area shown on the drawing. The base map doe the plat which was recently approved, but this relationship can Y� maps available at the City Hall at the time of the hearing. 2. Recently a Wetlands Permit was approved for the contiguous prope house located similar to that which is proposed in this applicat Wetlands Ordinance establishes a setback of 100 feet, from the p area in question. You will note from the site plan submitted th proposed structure will be 53 feet, two inches to the face of th the south side of the building. When this plat:was originally a it was recognized that each individual homeowner would be requir an application for Wetlands Permit as development occurred. It at that time that each of these homes contiguous to the pond on side and on the west side would likely not be able to meet the 1 requirement. . � tiguous to immediately s not show �e shown on ty with a on. Tlie nding t the deck on .,„�.., to submit recognized north foot 3. The home as proposed is setback the required 30 feet from the pu lic right- of-way. The Site Plan submitted�, however, indicates a 30 foot wide curb cut on Rolling Green whicfi is greater than that allowed byiOrdin nce. This ,, can easily be corrected by simply reducing it to the prescribed istance at the curb line (24 feet)•. _ i 4. The Planning Commission may wish to question the applicant regar ing the , nature of the roof proposed for this structure. The Council rec ntly adopted an Ordinance requiring roof slopes of a mini.mum of 3:12 itch. We have discussed this with the applicant but are not aware whet er it is proposed to build a flat roof or a pitched roof as required. . 5. It is also true that the house as proposed could be setback furt er from the property line if the garage were not placed in front of the ouse. You will notice that there is ample side yard space to accommo ate a home with a greater east-west dimension, thereby approximately i creasing � the distance from the residence to the pond. If the Planning Co ission and Council feel this is a matter of some concern, this could be investigated with the applicant. Prior to the meeting, we will attempt to as ertain the distance that the contiguous home is setback from the ponding ar a inasmuch as the Commission may consider that relevant to the reduction in setback proposed on this site in this application. e i � /� '� • �'' / � , � • \\`•�\ \ � •1� �� •� � � J: ,E � / � ��� ,�,� \ �-- I -� —� _ _ - � ' ,t� . ' . - , , ;��.•�` � "—` ' � u _ � _- ' '. ;'` .. -� —� ' �"•:, , ' ' _ . •,. . , -,--� - . _ . � % oE ��8,- . . , , f - .,,,;,, L - . i ``��. • ��� � . c �G• M� ri:;: I \ �c/ ' . �— . I � � � �'fti ' 1 `/ / 4 � \ � %� J - _ ' �::yi: •, .r•^•A C , j ' . � • I \\ e �' � � - t • •,•1 �urra�n �w + • 1 �\\ \ �,/ � / / � .�. � I j� ' � � `� • I � ••v- • �� � `� \\ � �� i / _ " .� � ���4's ••�I� '• o ' �� � / ' C� � � /,�. , -/� / I .,\ \ _ 4•: Gi�' • • G `_ , • �� •,� • u ,\� Z\ �i\ ` •/ � IZ �� � : ., - , \ • � • •� ' / 111' �� Y . , , . y°' • •�_ , ' / I1 'O •_•� : '� . J . — � v � 1 � _ . . �•,J � • � • • . � •- • ` / I � 1 ` •- •.r�'• ::;: -:::'::. '" ��', . • / •`� • / d' ` .., , C • .�7 s ,� I I g 7C 1 � �� , Y• ��' , j�� .� g �' I = � \ � .�_i' ' ' .� ' �' . ,' ; � � ._- . �. ` 1 • i • .I . i . . I � � MARIE I '^ �� I� $ 1 '\ � .� 1 � • • AVENUE d i I�, �� �. _ � • • l ' � ' .. PARK F_. _ ' i� � j �+ �'J • t . � � � i � � . j �� � I�` / . �+ � b ' , —�:.:ARIE AVENU N � � "' � • . i I�rd � �, 6U� � 1 � � 1.� � � � . � w � �• w I .�.. :E , ., , � u ,�, � _ - � � ii =_. ,� ,� • � y ' � • W • Y ' ` �` � • nrr� ° / �� I / ` I �� � � . �� tr � c°. V �� � j � •%�� . � / - � a' V I i� Q �� � F � � • � , .� , l �. \\ I • YlMDOT• LLEYENT�M1 � � � SU ' � � � 3CMOOL I.UlIICI n � 37U � n � ` � �� O �� � I •� w i r` � � z wcsr �ecu o . i . , \�c ..+.c �v � i � � 1 �� \\ �i . \ • \�%' . \ i o �\ � • �; � � � � � � CIV�C � � � \y r � � I . .i / . � - CEN R � � 1 � SITE/ I \ i �� // ' � '� \ � "i , i� � / / iY •I • •i••� � � � J • � / � • � i�: � ' I �e ,1 �X \ ^ FS� � J V. r:�..��s� . %� •_ � � / /, � • _ • � � C=�� __—� ' — � = � . � ---- H 1 G W A Y :�— � , �;��;4�- ■ • �• � � T <rk�,�'�`�,�H� . , �, p ,sE � � � ' .�`" _� � ; � / -� � I � j ��`�~ � M � E • � �%, J MENDAKOTA GOLF COURSE 9 COi NTRY CLUB � • I • • • � i (PRIVATE) '�� � z, . . 1 / IF 1� �. �� � o - • .. I �/ '� I � It � �, r ~ • • � i � ' z � �� _ � �-'---'�- - X '.r� _1 � _ •,// _" � a , :. ._ � � � : �• 1 '/ =— ♦ : �— _ — ! /, ' ._ _ � ' ' �r �. 1�\ .� — .�' � j � 1 � �.._, :� • : -? -, ; ; �- �- ' oa . — , � - \ �� •' � � •M • � �; �, CP,SE NUMBER: 83-14 Z 1,�� Mark J. Frenz '�� � � C� � -.-y ; / APPLICANT: ': � \. \• ,. ' I _ . .+, -- _1'/ ACTION: a Approval of Wetlands Permit ��,;�: ' t o aoo i000 2000 /\ a000 SC�LE �N FEET NORTH CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO T0: Planning Commission FROP1: James E. Danielson Public Works Director and Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer March 17, 19�3 SUBJECT: Case No. 83-14, Mark Frenz - Wetlands Permit P�r. Frenz has made an application for a Wetlands Permit and,a var ance for 1842 Rolling Green Curve. The property is located in the Rolling Green Subdivision, Lot 11, Block 3. At the time of platting it was not d that this lot and several other in the Rolling Green plat needed wetla ds permits granted prior to construction. P1r. Frenz's lot is immediately we t of Terrance Dobie, who was granted a variance on July 6, 1982. P�r. renz's proposed grading plan is in harmony tvith the previously aoproved obie plan. The basement slab elevation is designed to meet the required mini um three foot separation from the high water level of the holding pond. Mr. Frenz should be reminded of erosion control and his responsibility to remove any soil he allows to flow into the pond. Mr. Frenz has a reed to obtain signatures from the adjacent lot owners approving of,his plan. Subject to receipt of those statements we would recommend calling a minor development, waiving'the hearing and granting this wetlanc plication and the 36 foot 4 inch wetlands setback variance.! � is ap- � � �/�. �,, � `� IJ�'/' .. q '� T • i N • - The Demck Companias 1650 Shelard �wer Minneapol s, M 55d26 61? /546 2276 16 March 1983 , •�f. .! ,�,� � �•-� • • � - Mr. Mark Frenz • 3213 Minnehaha Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55406 RE: Lot 11, Block 3, Rolli.ng Green Mendota Heights, Dakota County, MN Dear Mr. Frenz: ' It has come to our attention that you are in need of a variance for the house you plan to build on the above described property. Pursuant to the protective covenants on the property, the Architectural Control Committee must approve your variance along with the house plans before you can go to the city for approval. (See attached copy of the covenants.) Please send a complete set of your house plans, including a site plan and exterior color selection to us immediately. The Architectural Control Committee will review the plans and the variance you are requesting and notify you of their f indings. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. - Sincerely, , � � -� � .,,i.r.i/ ' Roger D. errick, President Derrick Land Company FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE ROLLING GREEN, DAKOTA COUNTY, MN cc: City of Mendota Heights, Planning Dept. Corres/AwtgRpls/RD . �..f ,�. a , �, ���� ��� .� : . . - � -i rl �;�� `� -�� ---��,-� � ����- .�,-�� ���-�-- �'��� �. �� � - � �-� � ��'�� �� ���� �- ��'� �ai�'�1 � �' �`� �v � C� �� � `� �-'_'�"� �" Z��'-'"�,`�� ,�v'� �' l�� '��� ��i� �'�'�`1'��'I,��' 9�� �� �� r ����� �'�'�� '''�" , � �,Z�' ���� ���� .fY���/ �/ � ��2"Z�� 0 � ��,,",:�y�{� ' o�-ti9����"�y �.°�`'yJ•�z'�.ti/ � �"v,t-��'�'��-��j�.'� C �% � �% ) -v., 7 ; *y !'�„ )'1'�/ C �3' ��� �C-I i �" / ?^� r �,� —Yr,.h�'�`h✓ � ' %, � � 'v . � �'��;�lu��' �' ��;C.'�' �—�c-�v�rc� !z-��rz�.�,�;ri -� -�-.'"�-' ��y�Y'✓ �'' r �' �� �' -�-�z,�•C. , �i� y� �z--�� �J �?�-,)-,•� ;7 ,L. ��2''� v , � `1''u�����y��� /�," �-, , , 5�,��i�; /;l r� �J�� � `z �7"i .-�?� a'LC. _ �" .' °�' , . ��y -n%� �`' � �/ i C`�'b� _ ��, - 5=�. � d C�se No. ��I`�� CITY OF M�NDOTA HE:LGHTS . . >, , . . �+ ; DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESQTA , r� . � . :� •__' , � i� - .. �t; . � � �. , - , � _ � ' l APPLZ ATIO:;,:.�. ��' SI , RAT • - �+''`,' ��. , • .' ' � • .• ' C N•; �FOR� .CON I?E I4N � '' � � � - � � .. r>3 . . ' �- ' .�� �- '�.-_ �"�OF: N' • .� 'f�- .; y �=-g ,; . . �. , ..�,' "a�.i 4�,'L it�z .2. ✓ f ' . . Y. .s • . - �. . . . , , �' , Y �t� • j - r ' -', - . � ^G-'. e c . 'n:�.• ' .. r, .�'i :'T.' �u.� �*� � �l"� ;!. S,v' - '.• ., . . ;$^ • • • < •. _ PLANNING11�l;+QU�S1'"• � +S•. ,'��»'� :•' , , '•'�Xir. . �iS. i .4 • = T . ' - . 5• ' .. . ,� r :. t s i-i 'LL. �3 �+�• � Y yL i; � • � .. t . � : . . , ' �;,,,�el.� �tri' f�^ �� _ a'�,,, Y. � J.. ' , Y i. �'��' " . . : .y ,. 't' ; � � . - . . _ ^ ��2.r't:: �. � "� �F. ,. �:• Y f,� , , .. - r. . , ��� a ., ,. .�,'. .. �. �. . .'.�' �. - �. - . ; . :_:�:: -�� •r� _�� ��:'` . �Date of -Ap�plicatio ":�^.7—�''� • - � ;i-' ' ., . . - " . -�a4 r _ ' ` � :� .. St�`'fr•• "'` �a ti . �'�. _ ;'r' ' � . .. . . :�,: �, . . . > - G..pa .�' ` .�i�,t�.s':::.,�d _.'�s..• .�<:`p �ee paid�°;jfi�p - � �S'�f - . _ �. . . �,.<;,� : ,,; :� ,ti .t:E ..,. �„;;;,,� r �.r • ��;1;� ••t�: � � :�... ���"A1�P11cant � . ;. ... '�t „�:p �. ���.i.� `.. _,,,< �'� ri...,:�: ,,. . - F^ . >;,F..:. � •: .. � - �' , - Name:c � . NI,J�' ;�'%�i$$GGI�'#t'S.. _ .- .:��.,�Y�:'Gr .t?`� �t1l�tT�'"` `IP120�?�''���' - - ' - • .t� • - -��{ .' e �Last . - " ,' - :.First- .z...r;:���-. '.�.:.' .Ini.tial:� .`;:. . �� . . . =yµr', T �.' �:'} 'ti.'r'(.Y;�.,' cJ. .. � . - • :�i...:T�- . , � r . . F `; :,; ' rk��: ` .. . ,!«-;. .,. �.•:: - ,,y ' _ ' - r.1 •'' �=,a�-j w •`-• . �_; . ... .,. , . :ir;;.�{ 'Address: r•} ��� - Wi �(lT�." St'+� %r�y�K..L"CJ�'('l���N -� "�!"L7�/..s �`� �iS'>t"�1': jj •y � ! _ � . ; ' � �;-;'' Number. & Street ' •• `Cit �' � ' ` •• ` State"� � -�-� . . . � . � , .. � . ' y �= ` . • . .. - . ZiP � . , i , . • , ; " Telephan:e Number: " . �-, , . " Owner _ � Name: I�! 1-� %iSSOCl.4�—S st Addrass • S�M Number & Street � irst o U� ir�D ,P��P�r� Initial ' . C ity State SCree� Location of Property in Questian: � �a��hsr c�,e.��.. ,�ru� r�.�,�8' ,e�. h� n�o�t�� t��. , Legal Descriptian of Praperty: � L�TS I. 2_-�: s�, rr� bt�k� 3 � �u�-�t�ik 1-f�r�N7� • ;.: Z ip Type of Request: -Rezoning ` J( a - Var`iance , Canditional Use Permit , Canditiona2 Use Pertnit for P.U.D. rlinor Conda.tional Use Permit Subc3ivision A�proval Plan Appraval • Wetlands Permi� , O�her e Variance fram 4rdinanca Na. 40I, Section 29.1; Planned Ur�it I7avel� lot area requirement. , � • t .� PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 22 March 1983 83-11 United Properties Northeast Corner of Pilot Northland Drive Approval of Variance to Mini: for Planned Unit Development 1. Following the completion of the Comprehensive Plan for the C"ity Heights in 1961, and the adoption of a new zoning ordinance and the City in 1962, United Properties purchased a substantial por industrial lands designated for development north of Interstate proposed) and west of Trunk Highway 55. At that time a plan fo: industrial park was developed and approved and a few years la'te: Heights Road was extended east-westerly from Trunk Hiqhway 13 t� to open up the initial portions of the industrial park. Since � a few of the sites have been developed, with most of the land b� Road and Site Size f Mendota ap for on of the 94 (as an Mendota Highway 55 at time, reserved for the ultimate ,potential relating to the completion o�E I-494 across the Minnesota River, which of course opened in the Fall of11982. 2. Prior to the opening of I-494, United Properties petitioned for, City constructed Northland Drive from Pilot Knob Road to Trunk h This road is designed to open up for development the properties contiguous to the Interstate Freeway and form the southerly boun property in question in this application. Now that the freeway United Properties has chosen to develop a tract of land consisti acres under the provisions of the Planned Unit Development secti ' Ordinance which will allow for the construction of the two princ Yiuildings planned on the site. Inasmuch as these buildings are ' be constructed in three phases, the use of the Planned Unit Deve procedure is the best method for reviewing and obtaining develop from the City. • � and the ghway 55. hat are ary of the s open, g of 8.42 n of the oposed to pment nt approval Inasmuch as the Planned Unit Development process may be used for residential commercial, or industrial development, a minimum site size of te acres was established for purposes of processing a development plan un er the PUD Chapter of the Zoning Ordinance. Inasmuch as the proposed s te is 8.42 acres, it is thus necessary to process an application for variance to the minimum site size prior to the review of a PUD applicatio itself. The City Council at its 1 March meeting determined that the Plan ing � Commission could act on the site size variance at its 22 March m eting, and i� recommended for approval,�a Public Hearing for a Coriditio al Use Permit for approval of the PUD preliminary plans could be conduc ed at the 22 March meeting after the variance has been acted upon. G. 0 CASE NUMBER: 83-11 APPLICANT: United Properties Page 2 4. Each of you has been furnished a copy of a letter from United Properties to Orvil Johnson, dated 14 March, outlining United Properties' intentions and timing. The applicant is hoping to get a foundation permit approved by the City Council at its 5 April meeting. This permit would apply to the first phase only. Inasmuch as that permit applies to a single structure (at that point in time) on a single parcel (8.42 acres) the issuance of such a permit at that time is valid. 5. In the meantime, however, the PUD will be in process and could be approved by the Council at i�s 19 April meeting. The applicant, their engineers, and architects have been working at a fast pace these past months finalizing the concept and working drawings so as to enable early spring construction. There has been considerable contact with the staff on the part of all of these parties in a coordinated effort to solve the inherent problems in a project of this size. There has been a sincere attempt on all sides to make this a high quality development on one of the City's most crucial and dominant industrial sites. - 6. With respect to the variance to the site size (8.42 acres versus the required ten acres) may we suggest that the larger site size is not crucial to an industrial development, but rather that the limitation is in the Ordinance primarily applicable to residential development. The advantage of the PUD in residential planning is the dispersal of the density and ways in which to create and preserve open space where too small a site may in fact eliminate this potential. Thus, it would appear that the request for a variance to the reduced size is not a significant factor in this case. i� - � / , �, i, -�-� ,� ,. ` � - -___ _� ��J . �� , � • � � ; �'_" _ .. ' ' , � � ,:: �� \ — _- - �� ' '- � �. .�� . _' I • � � I'{=�`� ���. � . '`::'� __ =1 a `E• .�� +• --• �--''� ••• ` " - - _ --• �- � euc i ',.c �� '- riX£ vi[1o�r .vc � L ��� / _ � I{Y��' _ — � = \`� S'. .�Y� — '�_ _. \� �• � � � I I `� _ -� _�"". � I • _ .�..�� _ I - � - CEM�,TERti � - � i � / i � , — - � I :."C y,�'Ls- � K M 'l.� J i � • 1 _ y<`+'JN•+ i.�• � � �� 1 ; �f•"r,µ^ °. �,�� p� `��(: � • T' // ? 'G` __. .�___� �N.A.��:i^'N�j',,''G�".%h • I — u �/ � ,•'�z, z .:,, ,'.vtF�,E � = n j - �y ; L . � •r�,�, c.�-- " _ - I �_ ��-- �T ..•• .•• ` •n' ,r— _ ,� � � II � � I l I 4 � �� • ` _ -_ V . � o`��;: �— .,, u � ►. , � ;;, _• q - 11 , � :. �: ,Z(" -- • _ = ' � �/ � _-_ y - �� � � 1� i- " � _ — % . �� ' li'-T'` 'I � � . � �'�� _- __ -- n N` ��\ �, Q� � � l� \ _ _ , N�� � •�%Y — I � - _ « .o� � •• ••--�;q ' ':t'; � � ' K Y � ��� �a `n �_- i � - S,; • .� � • _ - — • ' � �y�2 � . � T s1 �� / �' .... 'q,�r. -" ` / /i . r. ' r� �: � � _ . � 'I •s �,.y' ' �•' /�// p �n �' � � � I . � � > � ,�� � �� � 'Z:;;:' ......... � 1 / �� I' � �^F.;" � / . I �,/ �� i;z�L2.� / . I r �. � v � _Y � ''Z�3� / _ � �- i � �_ � ,/�:�� � �'SITE � ; . ���. , ' �^ . �Y �i .�i � , � , � I � - �� � - � 1 1, / _ �^., , MENDOTA ' HEIOHTS ' ROAD ' � ,\\ .. , ',r0 � i o � � / � \ � I � . J . � �0��� � , � f � ' Q —.. ' w \ � / / � �I � � / / •�! u � , / / ,t � i �a N:��. .o'�- . �! �� � ,I j '/�� i� 1, . • � .' r Y e �� i --- 1 ; ` i � -::� -�+��� 1 � 'I • � • C� �• ' XOIITNERM ST�TES MME11 CO. � I f � 1 I S � % �. .$. , , .,�'�, x.,, ' � � _ . ,�• •�•'. -'�� •ti :..:'� .'.�'s• :r:?� Y � .. •...: �.—J^ � .�' ..rii�� �;�.f��f� �' ,�Ij.:. ' �5�`,�. " i� � ,•y. ..n .+ tl �: -,: p; _ , ... . . .. � �� : . :: _ . � �:r . . . �' .r� '�:��: '�.: �j� ',i I ; - •---- �---.•-- - . _ . _. i . . ;�1 � � . ' � CASE NO. 83-11 / 8 -12 �� � % ' • � /��,i �; ' APPLICANT: United Pr perties ACTION:. Variance o Site Size Condition 1 iJse Permit . i � .__ � � . 0 400 1000 2000 4ppp SC4LE �N FEET NORTH Case No. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MZNNESOTA APPLICATIQN FOR CONSIDERATION .. • pF . . . , PLANNING REQUEST Date of Applicatia �- 7—�' �J . Fee Paid ,�"90 � 3av ev Applicant � i9a �' r�ame: M!-f �t�SSoGl�4-7E3 C�o u�,�-r�b �'�oP��2�`yE5 ` Last First Initial Address: ,�SOO w� �Oi'� ST .l�l�MtNCo7Z?� �'illi Number & Street City Telephane Number: Q3 �— 1 OQQ Owner Name : M� A SSae rh�S C�c� v� rt-t� PP-�p���7ES Last First Initial Address: s/� E Number & Street , City StreeC Location of Property in Questian: No+C�rt-E-E hs`T' Co �,►E� P� t.dr tc�oa ,P.a ,,f+�D n1 Ak�F�va DR. State S'S t!3 / � �-P State Zip Le�al Descriptian af Property: t.D-rS 1. �.?. g �� Bt.-t�CK 3 OF M��T.�4 N�GH7S /�a�rnrr.tt Type of Request: • Rezoning � Variance _. .. Conditional tlse Permit � Conditional Use Permit £or P.U.D. rtinor Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval � Plan Approval Wetlands Permit ` M Other �p61 March 23, 1983 NQTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR CONDTTIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Natice is hereby given that the Mendota Heights City Council will meet at 8:45 o'clock P.M, on Tuesday, Apri2 5, 19$3, in the C ty Ha11 Council Chambers, 750 South P1aza Drive, ta consider an'appli - at�.on front United Praperties for a conda.tional use permit for a pl nned unit development on Lats 1, 2, 7, and $, Black 3, Mendota Heights ndus- trial Park, Mendota HeighCs, Minnesota. More particularly, this property is described as being east o Pilat Knob Road, sauth af Mendata Heights Raad and narth af Northl Dr ive . This natice is pursuant to City of Mendata Heights Ordinance Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed use permit wa.11 be heard at this meeting. Kathleerz M. Swanson City Clerk �. 401. �nditiana3. UNITED PROPEF�TIES March 14, 19$3 Mr. Orvil J. Johnsan City Manager City of Mendata Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Orvi ]. . The purpase of this letter i� to supply you with the ne infarmation ta grant us preliminary development approva Planned Unit Deve].opment at the southeas� corner of Pil Road and Mendota Heights Road. Enclosed are the follow architectural and engineering plans for �he Mendota Hei Business Center: 1. Preliminary site plan 2. Preliminary grading and drainage 3. Preliminary landscape plan 4. Typical building elevations 5. Park monument plan A preliminary fou.ndation plan should be in March 18. plan our hands by'' Aside from the city ordinance that requires us �o obtai� we feel that a P.U.D. is to our best advantage in provi� consisten� development concept for the site. Because tl Heights Bu.sin�ss Genter will be a phased prajec�, over t: corporating two s�parate buildings, a P.U.D. w�ll provi� the best .method a£ overa].l develapment tagether with sar flexibili�y. There are thr�e variations from code that we propose to into the P,U.D.. l. Common 1ot lines with no setbacks 2. Nine-foot parking stall widths 3. Park manument special signage iv�AE� 1 � ��c�� .. .. . .. : ������ �� �� . �:. �essary � far a �t Knob -�9 xhts Friday, i a P.U.D., ��ing for a �e Mendota me in- �e us with e financing incorparate Norfhland Executive Office Center/3500 West $Oth Sfir�etiMinneapolis, Minnesota 55431/I(612) 831-1000 l•11 . vl vll V. �1V111tJV11 March 14, 1983 Page Two The preliminary plat shows three lots for which we will submit a cross easement, cross parking and cross access agreement that will run in favor of each lot to each of the other lots. The enclosed drawings further specify the details of the plat. As we discussed on the phone, our approach to the P.U.D. process will be to submit the necessary drawings for Planning Commission and City Council approval and simultaneously submit plans for the building permit for phase 1 so that we can begin construction of phase 1 after preliminary approval of the P.U.D. on April 5. We expect to receive final approval for the P.U.D. on April 19. As you are aware, United Properties has owned the land for the Mendota Heights Business Park since the early 1960's and has been waiting for the proper time to develop the land into a quality. business and industrial park. We feel that the opening of the I-494 bridge over the Minnesota River and the growth of high-tech companies in the 1980's justify our development at this time. Existing companies in the area such as Cray Research, Comserv, and Sperry Univac will provide a strong business base on which to build our marketing effort. Given Mendota Heights superior housing growth potential coupled with an abundant supply of labor, we see a growing need for quality office-service space. The Interstate provides the necessary traffic link to the entire Metropolitan area, and the site we propose to develop sits at the doorstep to the Park. We appreciate your guidance through the P.U.D. process, and look forward to Planning Commission approval on March 22 and subsequent City Council approval on April 5. Sincerely yours, ���.�e�� Marc D. Cella Project Development Manager MDC/pb Enclosure cc: Howard Dahlgren Mark Duitsman Paul Berg Jim Samuelson S T0: f FROM: f CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO Planning Commission Paul Berg and Code Enforcement Officer March 17, 1983 Jim Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Case ��83-12, United Properties/ Case ��83-11, Variance ; Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development � United Properties was recently before the City Council for appi industrial revenue bonding for the development of four lots east of Knob Road between Northland Drive and Mendota Heights Road. t ' i � ; It was recognized at that time that the development contained t principal structures located in such a fashion that the existing lot inapplicable. After some discussion, it was determined that United best alternative, because of many joint or common uses, would be to the property as a PUD. ', • The area involved is less than the required 10 acres, therefore step is to consider a 1.58 acre variance to the minimum. Variances granted to the 10 acre minimum outside of the residential zoning di� past and staff recommends granting this request. Subject to favorat on this request, a public hearing considering the development may be to order. i t ; ; Phase I within this project is legal to begin independent of tY. and�grading has co�nenced, ; x Staff has worked closely with the developer in preparing the pl this development and it meets all the requirements foX a conventiona ision with the.exception of having two principal structures on a si.n of land and having 9 foot wide parking stalls. Furthermore, to enha overall park development, United Properties is designing a park monu would fall within a required front yard area. + We have reviewed documents submitted and recommend approval as f , � val of ilot were operties nlat the first ave been rict in the e action called others ns f or subdiv- le parcel ce the total ent that quested. PLANNING REPORT DATE,• CASE NUMBER: ! z�Piz c�T : LOCATION: { ( ACTION REQUESTED: � 22 March 1983 83-12 United Properties Northeast Corner of Pilot Knobl Northland Drive Road and Conditional Use Permit for Pla�ned Unit Development , i � PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: � 4 1. Reference is made to reduced copies of Preliminary Site Plans, P eliminary �Grading and Drainage Plan, Preliminary Landscape Plan, and typic 1 building `elevations submitted by the applicants. If your copies have mor than one plan indicating the site design, the plan dated 11 March 1983 is the appropriate plan for consideration inasmuch as it indicates �some final adjustsnents in driveway location and parking configuration. The driveway on this plan near the center of the site on Pilot Knob Road has een moved further north to better relate with the curb configuration on Pilot Knob Road. 2. You will note that the plan divides the development into three p 49,034 square feet of structure in the first phase, 22,139 squar the second phase, and 19,411 square feet in the third phas�e. Th building square footage is 90,585 square feet producing a�site c 24.69$ on the 8..42 acre site. Each phase will be occupied by a parcel with a separate mortgage applicable to each building phas respective property. This is the normal way of handling a phase �ment of this scale. Cross access and parking easements between �guarantees the functioning of the site as a single entity. You notice that in the event that phase one onTy is completed, that lots for phases two and three could'be developed as separate par unlikely event that that would occur. The end result is the sam which occurs in all large scale regional shopping centers for in wheze each.:'anchor tenant" normally owns their own building and the remaining "tenant building" has its own parcel of land and p accommodations. In this case, it would appear that the proposed taccommodating the three phase plan are appropriately drawn as a replatting of the land from the three existing rectilinear lots survey to the three lots proposed. 3. lThe building is designed to function as an "office-service" bui }concept differs fror,l a typical office-warehouse inasmuch as the `of offices proposed is much higher and the ceiling heights in t 'area are substantially lower than that normally provided in a t ,warehouse building. In this case, the two southerly wings of t ases with f eet in total verage of eparate and its develop- 11 parcels ill he remaining els in the as that tance, arking and rking lot lines asis for the hown on the ng. This rcentage service cal office building e CASE NUMBER: 83-12 APPLICANT: -United Properties Page 2 are designed exclusively for offices having 12,062 square feet of office in Phase One and 13,077 square feet of exclusive office space in Phase Two. The remaining areas of the building are devoted to office and service with the exact percentage of office ultimately developed being somewhat flexible. We would anticipate that in this prime location, a substantial portion of the building will ultimately be utilized for office purposes only. Thus, the entire development is planned so as to provide adequate parking for this event. 4. The required parking for offices is 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of usable office space, normally referred to as net square footage. This figure excludes corridors and utility areas and is measured inside the exterior walls. Parking required for "warehouse" is one (1) space per 2,000 square feet. Reducing the gross square footage by 10� (to produce a theoretical net square footage) the entire project has adequate parking for a total office useage. 90,000 sq. ft. - 9,000 sq.ft. = 81,000 sq, ft. 81,000 sq.ft. x 5 spaces/1,000 = 405 parking spaces The proposed development has 408 spaces. 5. You will notice that the driveway locations are planned so as to locate each a substantial distance from the street intersections at the northwest corner and at the southwest corner, Al1 the parking spaces are setback the required 20 feet from the street right-of-way, and the parking circulation is handled in a manner so as to allow flexible access to available parking spaces from any driveway without returning to the public street system. You will notice too that the access to the warehouse-service area is via an interior courtyard near the center of the project. Access to this courtyard is via driveways between the structures, thereby . substantially enclosing the courtyard area and the loading.and unloading functions that will occur within that space. This results in office spaces only oriented toward the public street and the contiguous property to the east. We suggest this is a very desirable feature of the plan, and works well on this site. 6. The entire structure is masonry with a pre-finished aluminum spandrel, insulated glass, and anodized aluminum frames. The exterior is entirely of face brick with the exception of the interior truck service court being painted pre-cas� masonry block to match the color of the brick. Ordinarily the City would require continuous treatment on all four sides of the building. However, inasmuch as the interior court is substantially hidden from the public view, it may be acceptable to handle the interior court in this fashion. . 7. We have examined the preliminary landscape plan, and suggest that the scope and scale proposed would appear appropriate. Our landscape architect suggests, however, that the species of overhead trees indicated on the . � ;� � � i � CASE NUMB�R: 83-12 I� APPLICANT: United Properties � i � a �plan are not tolerant to salt. This could be a problem particu7 �Pilot Knob Road if speeds of 40 miles per hour or more are perm� �the future. This can easily be corrected by substituting White :Norway Maple, two species that are salt tolerant. The Planning .and Council may wish to handle this by simply attaching a condit ;the PUD Approval that the final landscape plan be subject to the City staff prior to installation. I 8. �Approval of the PUD would also include the location and design f �"Park Monument" indicated that the northwest corner of the site ;project sign indicated at the southwest corner. Our drawings sL �yesterday (17 March) do not indicate the design of these structt hopefully they will be available for the Planning Commission anc -hearings. United Properties, as you know, has been applying a: ,and unique sign policy on all of their properties in Mendota Hei .This calls for a low "ground sign" placed 20 feet from the prope 'rather than the 40 feet ordinarily required by the Ordinance. E signs are low and not 25 feet high as would ordinarily be requir �40 feet, they represent a substantial improvement in the aesthet � It would appear that the continuation of this policy as proposed . PUD would be appropriate. 9, �As noted earlier, numerous staff consultations have been conduct ,the process of the preparation of the design for this project. have been most.cooperative and helpful in our joint attempts to high quality development that will be good for the owners and tt project meets or exceeds the development regulations with a mini deviations from those requirements as allowed for consideration � Unit Development. These deviations include: � • a. Eli.mination of setback requirements on either •side of the ir. i lot lines (covered by the joint easements proposed). 1 �b. Reduction of parking spaces from the prescribed ten foot wid to nine foot (normally used in all office development today. c. Placement of the signs at the street intersections in accord the past polic� applied to United Properties' ground sign co uration. 10. The Planning Commission and Council may wish to consider Planned Development approval subject to final staff review of the landsc �and review by the engineering staff of the drainage and utility ; t Page 3 arly along tted in Ash and Comr.i i s s ion ion to review of �r the nd the snitted es, but Council andardized hts. ty line cause these d •if setback c effect. in this d during he applicants roduce a City. The al use of n a Planned terior th �nce with zf ig- - Unit �pe plan �lan details. fID i � r a ��' �.y; �;�. � � � . c�•y�, �'' y �%� �''J _s . ,__ - Nlendata , � b�� Heights . �,a' Business �"_. .. ��� Park ,��� . � united properties a�,a000 .„ , �-.--�-- ..._.. � - ��— Pr.�.l�� � N1�'� - . ��� �� f� . � . � � : - 7, _ t�� �-�tz-�f �f �i �-�-�' - � G�Nf�I�� P�t� (l� 1 • �� C ��-� _, _ �. Ill �. . 'i t �-- 4 1 �� � I�' � � - (.� 1 - ���-�;;;.�.�V���.-,�—�..,�.�..� i • - - r I` .�. _.._ �... -_... .. _ � � . •�\� � _..� =,� � ;._.� _J : ., . J. ; ; ♦ ' , .,.�Y�-�" ����= `�}`� ' �.. � � � • • . . • � . /�: .,,�.;:., ��.,. . � .�\ ; ,—�� — ._._�r._ . _ -- — ---�___---�-- \`� �• ' ���'������ �c,�t.�'��=t'r)' - _ ''-:_.1 O i o' � �: U � �. mendota heights business center' 0 � ' (e�U i,1 .-. � � _ _ _ _ . '.—�,:------- - � I� .1 _ , "�I � `� '� j �-=�v=�==��_ � �--, --+ � I �yi r,'� --i r r � � ' __�, i. _ � _, • � - Ilrs " _� � � .4 �,I II� � ' � - � � . � -...�`�.�: � �,e p I � \ . �d t � __ '[af' !:i' '_'.___'__ � � �M1,o .�° 9 ; ; � +` i ; � r�++ ; � � i � ���' �' � � � � — —:� � i � - ,; � -- -� - • } - --- - - ; ---- -- � -� •�• o � ,;��. ,.. � b,. __ . �. � �'�---- � — -- ,?� c�) (i Q „ �'1� �e� _�h•TipG YOOT/NG ANO M1 'IOUN T/pN • /N ^NO¢T • �WiN6 T " - y ,.,�, ...y ��`�� ----- - - °�(t— y�'^oj 6' - v:.. �" �3', -� ....., � —�="0yI, C i«iit .i� y •– _• h i-. �—Y - r_- a{�, _. • � : i'��:i..r.w. �l� ",. n„� >�...�. .... � � � ,�_ . --� � :� �.,� �,�,� �.:� , GY� L! C NL9 06TA/t /T LOL. i0. ' ro. Ida•I d.uAplbn � .� � ._. � ` , . _ ' •. . . - ' roborl I. boland inc--^� P orchilods/plonne�s r�i�-�.ii.t il �riliJ I Dale Purpose ol lesua ihaet n0. 5-2 �,. ,��`�' � � M VY Rv w Av e-a � yd •wa �-J • .,_.....�....n, ,*.., 'ou �oeyt �nsa� w asoUmd e�ep /�us�t �rI Yst•r S�rw siovuo�d/spo��y�ia� �+x puo!°4't t�aqoi vasdu� •jw - �^ �,r�... � �v✓fd Noi.[ ON/�W pN✓ sw/sw/ +ri.�rrs r� I °. e� ; IJ jU .y.. I - ,. ^ � � - ` -, __ :. � �. �N �,I . - ----- �'' 1 ° �f'�� �� lirilG!\� '� I � _�...__....... I . � ` I l.-, �R ��i..0 � �e7`'.�r r,ae�� vr 'c� if _ t� uta e � " ' .st lil�f�no YJ�d �R*�J AY!!O J'IId iH09 �:c �I_ _ ��� ( i r: a �'� � - p , P _ t • +r � ' i Ff 4 � � '0 '..'�0 �' r\ 0 ll � 4 \'ti:. ^, , ��_.�p .�_ y.. . i_ I __' ; = »i" __ _ 4 - �.J � _�_ � -- � - �Q _ - ` �FRT. � r rt Y.��.:s F � ei.i D F� n ` �• � ' � � �: d. ......:.:� ,e i�::s"sa,n �` � � .w.,..,m.>: t % ' s• "'_—'miil��_ _"'a;�7i n. .s ...�«e�..i� I �� l' �-�'- t a:t� � l'L °i � F� �r Y �� t r,i � _....«..._ . _.. .. ._ ... . .. �._ . � ._ . . .. ...._._ .�..... � �^p f t ° x f �g i N ♦ F"` � ;wc i _ ; , � .€ � � m � � o" a , o ��- : ..�, � = F � .p\p X Q� >= a � q � m t� R � "' w�' k€:'£� p tl•R�' � r� �cG•' � �� �a 0 �� � � i ,�, ic ��"i4 O ' . ^''' �^.' � �°�g)� i , � ti"i � _ � :3� � �i a � t.-.-i _� € Ic�, � . � � � �"� '"3 E ¢pp�I ay � � IE 4: � ' `� � 8Ce p9 N+i `' _ �tyrt>t zS. � F�� � p i t S ��n : � aA � a, , G: i 4 I' q,� � Rh;: A F u : � 0��4 I € y °1 {E h � � n _., A i j' = �.i i � � � ..s t:;j; � ±; n 1!`�[^ � f' � p b :�Y�i c�;. iY� n .e `�:.�, � l a '¢ 'tt � � � F � � - �i � ��' �� i �� � q � a � 6 e ! � �� � xz' fp c' .�R€� r ~ I u ! 0 e � - 3i /�� m• '-`^' s� '� H � �: .� s*a ' �; 7 � � y e� ,� � e ��i e �� , ��� .�..��. 1� � � ; �C & i �. a w � �a �',,. � E � �� a9 � q- : C �°g � =' 6 �� : x s ; x (a$ i =' � , �SA F � I } . . . .. i.'s P .. t P � .. F vC) . .. . :. � '� � � ���EF��6"c°§'c6�c;� �. -� •�- � s€�sa,$� ., �� � �_ 3 . c::- @ 9 :e..:"6 t� SYA �2 7� �: ��m�� ?� ��H� S� �p�CS �.Cp�. t ..p 7��:7 ��D� �� a ��6 5�.3"�' i�= �` � de� �_ ��a -(^�.o' • � c s : : c : . . . . .. . _ ;. . ^ �x3F�C ��E"EEB��C��SCppce�F_�Ef:�§� P �' � 6ar�a:G�$ stE�oczd�Fr;�ra5°€=i`��F� � k r �g.e 4:�� cag` _E paSias_;� :• S"gy � � � ' t_ 9�Qa �~5� Y9�R ���a tlFiwxO�. . ,�fi ' Z r � _ � 3.Z=: YFtYz�F���EF ��yeaCi} 'yF Q�€.�i = Pxc y g { f � � � �� `�S^'; �Ft���%��BY�t3 �7.'. kF� t pF�G ' rrK I�� =•1 - ? 7^COE dF.�^���t�C'•�p^ ¢y. t�1Fi: aEpaF « T 'amia nr. �— � 7�� �Ssv L�3�CaF e�s�e�3� � �4C8 = cF: ��s5�E; �sEs � ��� �. �� = � ��� �Z'j EF=a��:� 3;c� �cE i ��3; � ���,..... ��� I � 2 � aE[ � �„a�e�F ���° S.`i, a :;,'= � . ?3 � n�c u � �.€�F:� �:ati"e ��: ' t.^Y . j" i� E ., [: �:`s3 ?'e. e" ' .:; I�_I� � � ' �` E: c a�� � i '^3 � �- �A� t 3 €; �n. ��:� o � c c.= a�� C ' S � p . �'C C.. - 3� �Q8�' .0 ' � r � � Cp � "••• *Y ER�G i�:e� � � � �.� � ` � . E « � �i R 7^ S � s �'� � ..� ' = e "s a� � a �_ � ' � e ^ ' « ���.�,. mendatc� hesghts business center � � ( i a � a l:J � s•. � �re..�_...� �r. —_.? • e�. '2.._-" �'p"-- --r�r.e_,�� �T � e'v c.ri ra+.a• ro�. � s:n 5 I I I ' �� I . __ _. _�-, � ._ 1 L_`___ _' i� '�� _ �.tl'N'.fSfe f•ro..1R rI)'O• � I L i F � I � :(, a t � .rr � � i � i - t;�a � \41 . � � '� � ( � I __ ; pp1 ra�r�c ...m \��x '�,;i'++i�S 3 � � ' i „� �i$e;���, ( � q '^ 0j 4; � � , '� # L —��� �� �lEd t�3 6 �. _ ' e . � �•� 1 t} e �b�'� p I � �� �� �e �;�; � �� �:�s ��.�iY te;� n .1�. _ i } : � � ' �S� ��F�1 {;;i � d N'�♦ ♦ ini{al.Y�is:a' ..'__!i4��--�+�...,._ ^li '���V 2Y�1 ,�,�__ —_ ' __ � __ � + __ � x d y� k;'; .` _; t � I I r " n�Z `�`� S.,. . _ I , .0 1,` nt�y �i; � c'�'i _�. '_ � i ti a v.� ��yf �{?, '� ( � w M� A d �` • u �} Z i� a � rtt •i:e ' i s'�i �� ♦�` �� ��;t /Va� td/1 � i�:e _ �p� 2\ ,i.. � .. II<• z � : �, � — - . � e a ��Ri ta7 � � � n : + t:J $ rJ —ii � m � � �, � �„���.: � �1ent�O�a �eight5 bvSl�e55 cer��ef . A 1,,, �_ � $ `�' .�.,o � z $ S'� a , . � �3: � Mn � � �I2 �o Y i p ^ '\ \ \ \ i � 2 2 2 0 t � a 6� .9 , ; . � � i8 � _ � `: �$ s�i m g � o� �Ji � ��c T o� t � v , ��c € a sz �2 L� „ro r cJl�) U --- ,,,:�_.,� r ze:, i ,.�e`- .• i '' — —�--r (_ - � -- i`'�.�..-- - - — ..,... e _ :i� E --- ---.;------- _ r ' �,. ! �•-- ____�_;;-�_ • � _ � � , ..... a: (gi' " � v e ` a � >:.eJ„ e • -- � I ,,.... � � � ;o . — , � i: � � � I i ( —i � c . � " ' - I � o : � r � — — — -��� --I- � :• I I �o ; � � , o , � ;: ; � � ! ., �;, ,�%� �:, � , ,�— ,, i o— ''=� � >> . , (4 y, y ''/ I .^ =�3• � ; €:. � � a' e4� � � w�sr.a �..., z �..r-_�—� ' .'s I : •,' �e:e t I a.:e . � I e'o � � vie• � � o mendota heights business center �i .~_ _ I I __ � ' . � _� : ..�� � �. w � •.sria _ .... "«!I '=i,..'e vo.. ' _ __ '_ � 4 , � �� � sipin�+iJiw w ♦ � 4 �.- �. . ; . ,: .y � ; � � ., X,...: _. _._._ , a � —� — ij � ! . �. . ;� .� ` � � , ...> I q � ' - � �� ,�� ; -i ...., � � I � , � ! ' �` _ _ , i �.� �Tj -- . - -li- -r------------- ---------- -- �I � >I/0 lill �'! l�d GtV �:e �" iro r � � — it:a a�w > r. i+. i�•r..r• R O O i F.a q M J N G P L N N ++�r. � < r i A L ..-- sa a e e' a' � • '" - -- sheot no. fit /l��a I�/L� - � s� / � _�'--_ �� �� d.v bu dJ 6V March 25, 1983 Mendota Heights City of Mendota 750 South Plaza Mendota Heights, UNITED P�OPERTIES City Council Heights Drive MN 55120 RE: Mendota Heights Business Center Dear City Council Members: We are requesting approval for a foundation permit to co an office/warehouse building at 2520 Pilot Knob Road in of Mendota Heights. It is our intention to start founda on this building immediately following approval from the Council. We will subsequently be asking for approval on building permit request at the May 3rd Council meeting. obtaining the permit approval on I�ay 3rd, it is our inte start erecting the steel frame during the first part of is our intention to complete this project around Oitober We have reviewed this project with both your Planning De and your Building Department and are now seeking your ap that we may proceed with the project as planned. We wil available at both the April 5 and May 3 Council meetings answer any questions that may arise. � Very truly yours / .Cl�:. :.:�, Bruce W. Palmer Construction Manager BWP/ jmm � 9 19�3 WRITER'S DIRECT LINE istruct :he City :ion work City a full After �tion to �ay. It 1, 1983. artment roval so be ta Northland Executive Office Center/3500 West 80th Street/Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431/k612) 831-1000 � I i CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 1, 1983 T0: City Council FROM: Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: United Properties - Foundation Permit Request On March 29, 1983, I received a letter from Bruce W. Palmer, Construction Manager for United Properties. Mr. Palmer is requesting Council approval of a foundation permit for Phase I of a three-phase project known as the Mendota Heights Business Center. The project is located on Lots 1, 2, 7 and 8 of the Mendota Heights Industrial Park. A permit application and foundation plans have been submitted and reviewed by myself and I would recommend Council grant Kraus- Anderson, the builder, a foundation permit subject to the proper licensing of the general, excavator and masonry contractor prior to permit issuance. M�GOUGH CONSTRUCTION C0. INC. 2737 NORTH FAIRVIEW AVENUE ❑ SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55113 o TELEPHONE (612) 633-5050 March 25, 1983 a Mendota Heights City Council 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN Gentlemen: , MA� 2�5 198� I would like to reguest a building permit to construct a auditorium addition on the Visitation Convent and School located at 2475 Dodd Road. We would like to start construction approximately the first week of April. If you have any questions, please call. Yours very truly, McGOUGH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. /• � � ��G G. McGough mdg C THE FOURTH GENERATION OF CRAFTSMAN BUILDERS �n � i CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 28, 1983 TO: City Council FROM: Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Auditorium Addition - Visitation Convent I have received plans, permit application and a letter of request (see reverse side) from G. J. McGough of McGough Construction Company, Incorporated. McGough Construction is requesting a building permit to construct an auditorium addition on the Visitation Convent and School, located at 2475 Dodd Road. Council may recall that Winsor Faricy Architects, Incorporated, of Saint Paul, were before both the Planning Commission on October 27, 1981 and the City Council on November 3, 1981, requesting approval for a nine foot variance to the R-1 Zones 25 foot maximum building heighth. Both the Planning Commission and Council unanimously voted to approve the requested variance. Staff had recommended that a new fire hydrant be installed at the north corner of the new auditorium addition and the existing inactive private hydrant, located at the west end of the existing building, be put into service. I would recommend issuing the contractor the requested building permit, subject to satisfying the City license requirements, staff recommended fire hydrant activation and a new one installed and compliance with signed plans and specifications as submitted. March�l6, 1983 Dear Sirs, This is in re�rard.s to Kiddy Park located between Ap� St. and Keokuk. Livina� ri�ht next to it we have enjo,yec seein�r how many people use it and how often it is used.. seems a shame that the equipment is�allowed to �ro unrepa: The amount to repair it is ve.ry little. We have heard that you are thinkir.a� of movina� some � equipment to the Friendl,y Hills Park and shuttina down K' Park. Living between the 2 parks we Ret to observe fir; how both are actively used.. It seems a shame to close F Park when with very little repair it can still b enjo,yec it can cut down on the Friendly Hills Park pla,y �uipment ov�er.lv; crowded. Before you make a final decision I hope ,you inform 1 area of what you are thinkinar of doin� so that others ha� chance to respond to this situation. A� N A ^ , �— , ; � � �. .:��`%(r-� ; �� . r n . �-t . �s �3 Sinc rely, '�� � Q (, � .o�': �'� i-C+�o^I �� Cedr�c and Janet Schrankle 2350�� Apache St . Mendota Hts. 4�52-4253 � � � � � � �� he It ed. the dy hand d.dy and ecomin�r e a /�, 9 �e �3 d ? JOHN G. PIDGEON MANAGER March 18, 1983 ,�"'� (.� �� ��=�J f�����. CITY �F BLOOIVIIIV�GTON, MI E��T.�i. MUNICIPAI BUILDING • OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD AT PENN • BLOOMING ,ON, MINN. 55431 The Honorable Robert G. Lockwood Mayor of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mayor Lockwood: JAM�S H. LINDAU MAYOR I am very concerned about the new tax bill, S. F. 487, H. F. 545, pa Article 7 which changes the formula for distribution of state aids. would lose $793,000.00 under the change, which is about 26% of our t and amounts to almost $10.00 per capita. It would result in Bloomin receiving $28.08 per capita in 1984. Other examples of what some would get per capita are: Albert Lea Mankato Duluth Minneapolis St. Cloud St. Paul Virginia $102.58 106.42 101.95 140.40 103.55 113.80 134.56 ti cul arly Bloomington tal in 1983 I� see from the printout prepared by the Department of Revenue that M ndota Heights will receive $251,225.00 in 1983, but only $17.4,927.00 in 19�4, for a loss of $76,298.00 if this legislation passes. That amounts to a 30 37% reduction and a per capita distribution of $24.00! I feel thi s i s a very unfai r di stri buti on of the sal es and i ncome ta which our citizens pay. If you feel the same, I trust that you will your legislators as well as the bill's authors, Senators Oouglas Joh Moe and Collin Peters, and Representatives John Tomlinson, Harry Sie Willis Eken. i Very tr41y yours, �� James H. Lindau Mayor, City of Bloomington cr �a �,fiy b�f��r� ��r� E��d��sfs �s crr� l��a�te af�t AFFIRMATIVE ARION � fQUAI OPFORTUNItY EMPIOYER � moneys �contact �son, Roger en, J r. and n CITY 0�' M�htDO7A H�1GtlTS M�MO Mcvcch 25, 19�3 � T0: C,i,�y Caunc,i,�. �ROM� Otcv.%P_ J. Jahwsa�. C.i,ty Adm.i.v►,i,a�'ica�on SUBJ�CT: Re�ceme.v�,t Ttutws.�,ti.an ,4c,t,i.v.i.�i.e� The, �.me h.cr,�, came �o �.�aee an necand my �.2a.ws �on ne,�`�i.x.tn.g �na, ac.t.c:.ve C,i,�y Adm.i.w%.cs�r.a�on wanfz. Oveh �he pa�s� �sevelca,e mav►�'h�s, T hav v.i�s�ed w.i,th each a� yau cance�cvu:ng my ne.tijcemev�i, and bome �ad��.b.�e .#�can�.i�i.av�a,� ac�i,v.i.ti.e�s. I am �ubm.i,�`.�.i.ng �some. �sugge�s�',%.aws and ,i,dea�s nepne�sev►,� a campo�.�r.te p.�an a� ac�,i.on a� �he �i�ougt�,�s cf�i.�5cws�ed. I wau.�d ptcapo�e �a ce.cue �c�f'.�-.�une emp.�.ayme� �somQ.ti.r»e �.n �he a� 1984, ikelr.e�otce, .i� �he�ce .v.s �0 6e an a�d.��cr.n� on deputy adm�.n.i an baand dcvt,�..ng my �enuxe, �sueh a p¢Jr�sovc �shvcc�.d 6e heeti.u.�ed, de.2ec.� be an payrco.�2 by m.F.d-Oe,�oben a� 19�3. Th.i.�ss mema .i„rr..ceude� dame e�� da.#,a. and �sev�r.a,e nece��cucy .�.tem� �an .�he .�'icavvs.i,t,i.an. , P.�ea�se cavvs.�detc �he �a.22ow�i.ng: 1. The Adm.i.vws:�c.a�on - an excejc�� �nom LMC f�and6aoFi. 2. Re�sa.2u�.�.on #44k, da,ted Novembe�r. 1 b, 1971, C�ce.a�i,ng �h�. 0� ,4dm�i.n,i��r.cLto�r.. , 3. Re�o.Eu�',i.an #449, da,t�d Novem6e�r. 1 b, 1 R1 �, Appa.��men.t, und Co ncLi,�'.{.o n� . ' 4 , Schedu,�e a � Ar,t.i,v.�,ti.e,� . ' 5. Qua.�.L��.ccz.t,i,avus os a�e�acLty C.i,ty Admi,vu�s�'ica�on. ; .. '► ba,a e�► a� ♦ ij n - 2 - 6. AnnauncemevLt and Adve�i� e}nev►,i. 7. An,t,i,c2e�s snam Pub.�i.c MaKagemevi,t a. �cCi,to�r,i,a.2 b. "Gaad Pnae�,i.ce� . . . " The b.vc�,� �Gvicee .i�em�s cvice �.nc2uded �a mane {�c�?.ey acqucu.v�i yau w,i,th �he chcvcge.� and cancCi�,i.avus a� necanded. Addi�i.avi.a,� da,ta can be ab�a,i,ned �nam �he League o� M.i.vr.ne�5o�a. C.i,t,i.e�s, �,S de�s-viced. The LMC inema, "The C.i,ty Adm.i,vi,i.��1r.c�tan", .v� ava,i.ecc6.2e ban yaun �,vus�ec,t.<:on. Re�so2.wti.on #448 wcvs dna��ed �a ne�.�ec� dcLti.e� o� a C,i.ty Mav�age�r., ye,t ne�s�ec.t and cam�.2y w.i.th �he .�ega.2 ne�pav►��.b.i,P,i,t�,e�, c�, mew#',i,a�.ed .in �he LMC exce�c��. R�sa.2u�'.i.an #449, Appa�.vLtmew,i, .i�s my "cav�icaat". Some a�p.P.i,cawt�s may de�.vice �o have a�anma.2 cav�cac.t. Th,us .i�s bec�m�,ng mane �neva,�evi,i a.r►.d yau �hau,2d be adv.i,aed �hcLt �he �ucce�s�ssu,2 cand,i.da,te may a�sFz �an a 5atuna,e cav►�caat. The SCH��UL� OF AC7IVITI�S ,i�s �,nc,euded �a g�.ve yau an �.dea ob �he �.i.me �name neede.d. A�s yau na�e, �h,i� �nace�s� �hou,�d ��a�r,t �.n .2cc,te A�n,i,2 otc ean.e.y May. Une de.ta,i,� �ha,t ha�s n.o� been adc(�.e�s�sed: Glha,t �y�e a� Caun�i,e Se,eec.t.i.on Comm,i,#�ee �hau,�d be Sonmed? Da you wawt a�sub-camm.i,t,tee ,ta �e�cbatrm on mav►,i,iorc S�e� #4? Now �shau,2d S�ep #6 be handked? Haw �honough2y and who �hou,2d pe�r.�o�cm S�e� #g? �ven p�r,i.an �o cLuscws�s�.ng �he �evelca,2 �se,eec,t,i.an �s�e��s, you �shou2d e�s�a.6.P.i�sh �he �i�e and quc�,Zi.b�.ccr�,i.ovus �on xhe �.vt�etr.c.m �o.�.i�'.i.on. Unce �hcLi .v� a�pnoved, �heK yau �shau,P.d e�s�ab.P.ush a na,te ab compev►�cct.i.on and �he annaunceme►tit. Sugge��ed �otr.ma� cvice �,v�c,euded a�, ,i.tem� #5 and #6. I am �ahi.ng �he .2,i,beh,ty o� cr,t,tach,i.ng �cua afr,t,i.c,2e�s snam ICMA'�s Na�i.ana2 magaz,i.ne. I am na� �ugge��.i.ng �ha,i yau carr�a�.on an Fxecu�i.ve Seanch b,vcm (a,2,ihaugh .i,t �elcha�.a �shau,2d be covvs�.dehed) , bwt I am �sugge�s�'.i.v�g �ha,t you ccuce- �u,2�y covv��,de1c. wh,cLi �hey do. The �cli.tajr.i,a,e. ,i.d �,nc�uded �o em�hcu�.ze xhe �.dea � • s�sra�oud a�qb -�rpa� b a�npoucl o� h�ros��a�aU �uo��rpap pUn h6ua�ua a�y� Uy �nd ua�y� `UQr.�nn�a -prsn,+ � pa?pn��i unQh s�.-�a��jak �n�� ��og �'�y'2'9�sra P2mQ�y� no� •�r aasr j rro sn� `a�a�y pa�na�aucl sro `srsra�Q�rcl s�-y� h�smornqp •uauubu� h�aurr.� b Uy Uaz��� � uo;r.�-� a�n?�rdokddb ua�y� P�tn `pa�npUo� pUn pa�uUb�cl aq un� po?�vcl U�ysr�n��rp s�sra�aU a�y� �,1� osr au�?'.� s�'y� �n Pa�.'.�?'u�qnsr 6u?-aq yr ou�aYV s:n11 •„a6n���ncl uo;r.Xnuapy�+o��� 2'b�o� a�1� o� PPb P2mo�ys� pun `uo�-uycfQ hu� u;r a�rr�rdo�rdr�b huan a�ro sra�;r.�ro on� a��1 ',��'�+oug dn�� �?' op noh �sra66 �i I�sruQr.xnpuawu�o�a�r a�y� qo h�b �uno�sn�p o� ub�d uo `aau6bs�rp noh gI . ��Uop am noh �i, op �noqb �roa� a�;rnh �r a2�;r-X� �� . . . �a�r�bud P��J�� a�11 '���+bm `�?" s�?"y��� �1� aa�r6� p�nb �sn2" a2"9b�cla��� h�n�nu� b o� �+;rod �n� � � os� �rr�gga pU� aw� �y6noUa pUad�i p�nr���i no� •s�o6 6U�-ys'.�2'9�� gQ The Administrator A position much like that of city manager in ' Plan B cities may be established by ordinance in standard plan and Plan A cities. These coordi- nating duties of the position of city administrator may be assigned to the city clerk, deputy clerk, or a special administrative officer. The duties so � delegated must be purely ministerial: The courts will not permit the delegation of legislative discre- tion. The duties which may be delegated are the � supervision of workers, accounting, preparation of ' reports, factual determination and execution of council policies. The power to hire and fire employees may not be delegated nor may the administrator make purchases and let contracts without specific st��lards set by the council � governing this action. 4 ; Some problems arise when the duties of this position are not clearly spelled out. A detailed job description should be prepared before this position is filled. (See the League memo "The City Admin- istrator.") � A new concept in city administration involves the "circuit riding" administrator. Several small cities may agree to share the benefits of a profes- sional administrator by sharing the financial burden as well as the time of the administrator. (For more information, see "Five Mayors and an Idea," Minnesota Municipalities, March, 1976, pp. 4-6.) Except in Plan B and charter cities, department- al managers are directly responsible to the council. While they may make decisions of a daily routine nature in the operation of their departments, all questions of major policy must be referred to the council itself. In cities operating under Plan B, however, the department head is directly responsible to the city manager, not to the council, and as a result, must make the reports, submit the budget, and be directly subordinate to the manager. In fulfilling their supervisory functions, admini- strative officials should perform the following tasks: long and short term departmental planning; organization, direction, and coordination of the work load; reporting, both to the council and to the general public; and budgeting, both preparation and execution. ( , Villaqe of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. 448 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR AND CREATING THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE VILLAGE OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS WHEREAS, the Village Council of the Village of Mendota He the belief that the operation and functioning of the Vill be improved and better coordinated by the creation of the of Village Administrator, and that the administrative det the Village would be more efficiently and economically ha the creation of the office of Village Administrator;i ghts is of ge would office ils of dled by NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Village Counci�l of the Village of Mendota Heights as follows: � That the office of Village Administrator is hereby created in the Village of Mendota Heights; That the Village Administrator shall be appointed by the Council on the basis of his training, experience and administrative qualifications; That the duties of the Village Administrator shall as follows: � � a. Exercise control and supervision over all dep rtments of the Village and coordinate the activities of c nsul- tants and advisory bodies. ! b. Submit to the Village Council recommendations relative to the appointment and removal of all em loyees of the Village on the basis of inerit, and act as Personnel Officer being responsible for the implementation o�f Village persannel policy. � c. See that all laws, ordinances and resolutions of the Village are enforced and shall make recommendations for changes or additions to ordinances when necessary. d. Attend all special and regular meetings of the Village Council and actively participate in such etings in all respects, except he shall not vote. � e. Prepare and submit to the Council the proposed annual budget, and enforce and administer all prov'sions of the adopted budget. , f. Submit reports to the Counci3 on Village finances, budget status and administrative activities on a regular basis, g. Keep the Council advised as to the future needs of �he tTil.3age and make recaminendat�ions an lc►ng range programs and capital impravements, h. Recommend to the Cauncil any other measures required � for the efficiez�t admiriistration of Village affaiars and promotian of commuriity welfare. i. Such ather duties and responsibilities as may be assigned to him by the Vil].age Counci].. Adopted b�r the Vil.la e Counci2 of �he Vil2age of Mendata Heights �.h i s ld _ d ay o f _���,.'�%��.,._. � 19 71. AT�EST- /i� . �1 A Gilbert M./�3 abaug Village Clerk � VILLAGE COUNCIL VILLAGE OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � :� ��-�r� ,�" .� � gy ' �1�� �� Donald L. Huber 0 0 Vi7.Iage o£ Mendota Hei.ghts Dakota County, P�4innesota RESOLUTTON N0. 449 WHEREAS, THE Village of Mendota I�eiqhts d�sa.res� (r �' to fill the positian of Village Administrator as previousf established by resolution; and � � WFiFRE1�S, it is the desire of the Village Caunci to �stakalish certain condi�ions of employment for said Adminis�ratar and to provide c�rtaa.n �enefits; !�� :dOW `PFIEF�FORE BE IT RPSOLV�D that Orvil J. John�on is hereby appointed as �Ti7.lage 1�dministra�.or anc� her�a.naft�er call�d "'Adminis�rator," and; IIE I`i' FURTH�R RE�QL��n that the folZoc�ing terms and conditions are herehy �stablished: a. T�rm of. Fmployment. Said appointment shall. be effective January l, 29?2 and shall. he for an indefini e period of ti.me. ?�?othing shall prevent, limit, or otherwi e interfere c•rith �he right of the Village Counczl ta termin te th� services of �ldministrator at any time; an� nothing s?z 11 prev�nt, lirnit, or othercaise interfere witJ� the riqht of ,i�dminis�ratcsr to resign at any time. :�. T�rmination and Severance Pav. In the even the apnointment is �erminated unilaterall,y h_v the Village Council, tli� Villag� agrees to �ay a lump sum cash paymen equal. to two months aggregate salary. In th� �vent � 11.dministratar valun�ari2y resigns his position with the Village, he shall ga.ve the Village two months advance noti e. c. Sa2ary. 2he Viilage agrees �.o pay ndministr � for his �ervices pursuant to this resolution an annual bas salary of $21,000, payalale in i.nstallm�nts at the same tirn as other employ�es of the Village. Saicl base salary'and/a ather benefits paid ta 1ldministrator shall he reconsidered an annual basis at �.he same time as similar consideration given to other employees generally. � tor an Ls d. Automobile. Th� Villa�e will provi�� car allowance of $100 per month, payable monthly, for thP exclusive and unrestricted use of an automohile furnished by Administrator. Such automobile shall he used for all transportation required and expected in conducting Village affairs and no other in-state travel allowance shall be granted. � e. Professional Development. The Village hereby agrees to budget and to nay out-of-state travel and the subsistence expenses of Administrator for attendance at meetings and occasions designed to continue professional development including hut not limited to the annual conference of thP International City r�anagement Association, State League of P�unicipalities, and such other groups and committees deemed of mutual benefit to hoth the Village and Administrator. The Village also agrees to budget and to pay the professianal dues and subscri�tions necessary for continuation and full participation in national, regional, state and local associations deemed mutually heneficial to the Village and Administrator. f. Fringe Benefits. The Village agrees to provide vacation, sick leave, hospitalization and medical insurance, and other fringe henefits in the same measure as are nrovided to other Village employees. Adonted by the Village Council of the �Iilla�e of Mendota H�ights ttlis lGth day of 1lovemher, 1971. AT� S'i' : / i.,�.� Gilhert � adaba Village. Cle k � VILLI�GI: CC1Ur�ICIL VI Gl. OF r4I;P�?DOT�'1 L-iEIGtiTS � ^ B�, i '' `� .� Donald L. Huber �'�ayor Step 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES Date May 17 Council establishes position, sets desire qualifications and compensation. � June 7 Announce opening and advertise, circulate recruiting letter. July 11 Last day for application acceptance. July 11-15 First stage elimination, submit written q estions to 20 or 25 of most desireable and qualified applicants. July 15-29 Receive responses from questionnaires. Aug. 1-5 Grade responses, select top 5. � Aug. 18 Council interviews top 5(3?) Aug. 22-31 Check background on top 2. Sept. 6 Council makes�f inal sel�ction and offer. Johnson resignation received. Oct. 17 Successful candidate commences work. Jan. 17, `84 3 months report by Orvil J. Johnson. March 17 5 months report by Orvil J. Johnson. i April 17 6 months completed. May 1 Johnson resignation accepted. Permanent appointment made. UALIFICATIONS OF THE DEPUTY CITY ADMINISTRATOR Professional Training 0 The Deputy City Administrator applicant should have completed a Public Administration or Public Affairs course of study in a recognized college or university. Although a Masters Degree is not required, holders of MA degrees will be given some additional consideration. Administrative Experience The Deputy City Administrator applicant shall have Personal Integrity Committments to Community completed at least five years of experience in a similar responsible position. Although "full-service" City experience is desirable, applicants having experience or .aptitude for suburban activities and interactions will be given additional consideration. Experience i� the �ain City Metro area will warrant special consider- ation. A documented record of successful urban co�nunity experience is important to the City Council. The City Council will employ an administrator whose intergity is beyond question. The administrator is expected to be loyal to the goals of the City, honest in all respects and of sound moral principles. The City Council is interested in providing basic community services only, believing that "the least amount of government is the best government". Accordingly, the Council is looking for an administrator whose record supports good "business-like" government operations with the least amount of empire building. � ANNOUNCEMENT The Mendota Heights City Council has established the position f Deputy City Administrator. The reason: to recruit a person to work ith the present City Administrator who plans to retire in the spring of 984. The person selected as Deputy City Administrator will be considered as t e prime candidate for permanent City Administrator. ' The City Council desires a smooth transition. The members bel'eve that � a six months "get acquainted" period should provide a frame of refer nce for the new person. The present City Administrator, Orvil J. Johnson, w'l1 aid the City Council in recruiting the new administrator. After the City Co ncil makes the final selection, the new Deputy will work with Johnson for six m nths as an "in-service, get acquainted" period. Plans are to have the new p rson begin in mid-October and Johnson to leave in mid-April, 1984. Orvil J. Johnson has served as the first and only City Adminis rator in Mendota Heights since January 1, 1972. He plans to do extensive tra eling while still maintaining his residence in West St. Paul. I APPLICANTS WANTED CITY ADMINISTRATOR -- Formal education plus minimum of five ye rs experience in local government administration. Will work with prese t City Administrator until his retirement in April, 1984. Salary $ , plus fringe benefits. Applications close on July 11. For application fo m and further information, contact Orvil J. Johnson, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights,MN 55120 (612) 452-1850. I � :C�l��Y'' �r �1�Ut�'.S► Seven years aga executive search was a highly contraversia! practice. Managers asked biting questions #a the "headhunters" who spoke at the 1976 iGMA conference in Toronta. Whiie there were a number of firms in the executive search business, few had cfevated themseives ta executive search far any length af time. Taday ihe situation is different. When executive search consu�tants come to ICMA conferences, they are sur- rounded by managers eager to make themselves known. There is more curiousity now in hearing what per- ceptians these recruiters have of the profession. They have become re- spected observers af the cou�cif- manager retationship. Bu# there are still many qusstions about their role in the selec#ion af a city or county manager. There is con- cern thai soms in the executive search business are unethical or un- professional. Some managers be- lieve, for example, that executive search firms p(ay favorites and are prejudiced against women, minor- ities, or individuals uncfer the age of 50. i'982-83 IGMA Executive Board PRESiDENT Stan E. Kennedy Village Manager Wilmette, Iliinois PAST PRESIDEIVTS Walter A. Scheiber, Executive Director Metra, Washington COG Washington, D.C. Thamas G. Dunne, City Manager Walnut Creek, California Lawrence Gish, City Manager Stillwater, Oklahoma VICE PRESIDENTS West Coas� Rcgion: John E. never, City Manager Lang i3each, CaliFornia Elclon S. Mills, City Manaber fiilist}or•c>, �r•egon Because there were so many ques- tions and concerns, lGMA held a meeting with six representaEives af executive search firms in December 1982 to review the prpcess of execu- tive search and to discuss some of the managers' concerns. It was an excelient meeting. The group agreed that ICMA could assist in preparing a set af guidelines for elected officials to consider in hiring an executive search firm. ICMA could also help in deveioping a"Code of Good Practices" for search firms. To share same of the other issues that were discussed at the meeting, several representatives agreed to write articles far this issue of PM. These articles describe how execu- tive search should be conducted and give the firms' perspective on some of the questions and concerns that have been raised by managers. dne of the strangest impressions fram the executive search represen- tatives was how impartan# they feeS their role is in he�inq elected officials aiven communr�. i ney ao crns as they help the cauncil define #he crite- ria they want in a new manager. It helps build consensus among Midwest Region: Richard A. Wilkey, City Manager I7es Moines, Iowa Wiitiam A. Basse#t, City Manager Mankato, Minnesota counciimembers ar manager goad dire year. "It needs to t atly as issues are r� cils change," comn erts, KarnJFerry IM All of those at the r #hat cities and cour goal setting sessioi some cities and ca� #his should be an ir Paul Fieaume, Paul ciates. Attending the meeti Roberts and Reaun Scott, Municipat f�C ald Zweig, Ronald ; DonaEd Pearson, tlti of Central Manager Graham Watt, Ft. L; ICMA President St< Executive Director I also present. Northeast Regior, Osmond C. Bons Yarmouth, Main Larry N. Blick, t Rockville, Maryl Southeast Region: Other Countries: Narman W. Hickey John C. Robison Caunty Administrator City Administrat Hiltsborough County Fredericton, Ne� Tampa, Florida ' William H. Carstarphen At-Large Vice Pre City Manager Karen Davis Ktif Spartanburg, South Carolina Intergavernmeni Mourrtain Plains Regiorr: Joel D. Valdez, City Manager Tucsan, Arizona Andrew J. McCo�vn, City Manager t:ngle�vaod, Colorado San Antonio, Tex John H. Eckenrc Village Manager Northfieid, Illino gives the new ion for about a updated annu- �olved and coun �nted Norm Rob- •national. :eting agreed es need more ;. "The fact that ities do not do ictment," said . Reaume Asso- in addition to were: Roger ars, Inc.;�Ron- ;iq Associates; nt Services; ierdale, Florida. Kennedy and irk Keane were �`� y, Town Manager ty Manager nd r Brunswick itlenls: ver 1 Relatians s d, III �ood Practices for Executive Search Firms by Ronald Zweig Ronald Zweig Associates Hackensack, New Jersey n early December, an open and constructive meeting was held in Washington, D.C., with representatives of executive search firms, members of ICMA staff, and the ICMA presi- dent, Stan Kennedy. A portion of the meeting was devoted to a discussion of good prac- tices that should be followed by executive search firms. These might be developed into a Code of Good Practices to which manager search firms might subscribe. Professional Practices In assembling the elements of good practice, the author concluded they fell into two categories—ethical and etiquette. Webster defines ethi- cal as "conforming to professional standards of conduct." Etiquette is defined as "the forms, manners, and ceremonies ... as required in society, in a profession, or in offi- cial life." It is interesting that both definitions specifically relate to professions. Clearly, the list of good practices that follows is based on the concept that professionals are dealing with professionals. � � tt � � � � ♦ � f � i . � . ,. . y ,. .. •, a � .. _ � , �,�:•' . . - - -• ._. . . � � � � � m.,.r-,oa- --+so�- -�taa� .0 � � w ? The Executive Search Contract " � ; Good practice requires that the ' search firm not work on a contin- gency basis: a fee is payable when _ .��1 �, ' an appointment is made regardless :�',.I.�:'' of the source or if the search is -- '�' terminated for any reason. This ar- rangement is no different than the basis on which other consultants are retained. The searcher is paid for investing his or her time in a total process. The process should not be confused with that of a place- ment firm which simply checks its files and offers the client the most likely candidates from that single source. The elements of a search are described in de- tail by Paul Reaume in this issue. ' Since the search firm will be held responsible for the ' final outcome, good practice warrants that the firm contract for the entire process. The firm should refuse to undertake a portion of the task, such as ad- ; vertising, reference checking, or screening applica- tions. RequIrement of Vacancy Some councils request search firms to begin a search before they terminate the employment of the incum- bent city manager. In this way, they hope to reduce, or eliminate, the acting manager period. No search firm should accept an assignment to fill a position � until a clear termination of the in- cumbent has been made. Acknowledgment of Applications Common courtesy dictates that ev- ery application should be acknowl- edged in writing. And each one should be acknowledged promptly. Further, each applicant should re- ceive written notification when the search is concluded. This letter should indicate the name of the suc- cessful applicant and the effective date of appointment. This informa- tion should reach the applicants be- Eore the ICMA Newsle�ter containin! notice of the new appointment. • ..�, Confideniiality — The nature of the council-manager _ relationship is such that preventing �'��� �'� the names of applicants from �;:!'`�:��i�: . reaching their present employers is '— a prime responsibility of the search firm. This is especially so if the candidate did not apply for the position but rather was persuaded to become a candidate by the searcher. There is a time, of course, when the candidate's em- ployer should be informed. That time varies based on the peculiarities of each situation. In all cases, how- ever, it should be the candidate who informs the council—not a newspaper reporter. Open Recruitment Every position should be advertised in the ICMA Newsle�ter and other relevant publications. The notice should contain all requirements in the profile com- piled by the search firm based on discussions with members of the council. Unequivocally, no search firm should accept an assignment in which the client expresses age, sex, color, or religion as a factor of se- lection. Resumes received, either unsolicited or requested from a prospective applicant, should not be edited or changed in any way. Those that are referred to tfie client should be exact copies as received. Public Management/March 1983 � Cvuncil Atleridattce rlttendanee by nll meml�er-s c�(' tl�e g��re:r-�Sing bociy fc>r nll interviews is of urn�Ust importance. l.ack of atten- dance indicates to the applscant that the council doesn't consider appointment of a city manager im- portant. Further, absence oE members at specific in- terviews precludes futl and tneaningful participation in the selection decision. Pluses and Minuses Good practice warrants that the applicant be tald all the negatives as well as the pasitives of the situation. The search firm does neither the candidate nor, in the final analysis, the community, any service by dis- cussing only the pasitive aspects. Travel Expenses Travel and subsistence expenses far candidates at- tending the interview shoulci be reimbursed. The search firm should describe the arrangements ko the� candidate when the interview is agreed upon. The re- cruiter also should assist in securing accommodatians and making travel arrangements within the commu- nity where the applicant is ta be interviewed. In shart, the searcher shautd make certain that the can- didate is treated in a haspitable manner. Interview Preparafion A meaningful inkerview will accur if the candidates are given infarmation abaut the cammunity before the interview. Such inEormation might include a pro- file af the community, current budget, or annual re- gort. In some pracesses, the candidates are taken on a tour of the community. In others, they are given the opportunity to meet with department heads or other of�icials. Good practice requires that all candidates be treated equitabty. Tn much the same way as managers should dtal with councils, what is given ta one should be dis- tributed ta all the athers. And, of course, there should he no caaching of candidates with "inside" informa- tion an questions that are likely to be asked or on haw ta answer them. Credential Check Aithough uncommon in the city manager professian, there have been instances in which candidates have falsified educational attainments or work experi- ences. Goad praciice requires that the executive search firrn verify this inforrnation before the candi- date is scheduled for interview. Reference Check Normally there are two periads when reEerence checks are made. The first is befare the candidate is scheduled for interview by the council. Since can- fidentiality is required at this stage, the reference checking znust be perfarmed discreetly, Search firms generally do this by confidential discussions with other city rnanagers wha•are familiar with the candi- date. The second check is made after the interview but be- fare a format af�er is made. This check is usuaI]y per- formed by the new ernployer assisted by the searcher. Since this check normally involves community offi- cials and other Ieaders, it is performed after the can- didate has had the opportunity to inEorm his or her gresent cauncil. Fa�nily Decision The decision to relocate ta a neiv commuizity is a ma- jor ane for any family. IE the Famity does not adjust ta Public Management/March 1983 thc n��v ct�irtmunity. tlir result is an ti�iplcaszs�it es- ��erie��ce for tl}e {�tm"rl}r at�c3, prob�}>I}�, �i si�ai•t �er�iir-e for the new mana�er. 'I'his is espcciaU u•uc: tc�day �vf�en sa many mates as-e emplayed in their o�vn ca- reers. Goad �ractice suggests that tl�e searc grocess in- clude an opporivnity for the spause t visit the cam- munity beEore the offer af appointme t is made. The visit should include apportunities ta e glore hausing, educationat institutions, cultural and ecreationai ac- tivities, religious instiwtions, and, if a plicable, em- ployment oppartunities for the spouse 1�Io Easy Choice The gaa! af the search firm should be to make the fi- nal selection of the council as difficult as passible. That is, the search should seek out th best candi- dates available for that particuIar situ tion. In na case should the firm refer one gaod c ndidate and six athers who would serve only ta make he good candi- date a clear and easy choice. Ghoice by CouncIl Very often, at the canc]usian of the in erview stage, the council will turn to the searcher a d ask which one he or she would select since he a she is an ex- pert in the field. This recruiter has the following stoc question. First, I explain that they ar and meet the profile developed by th therefore, it wauid be unethical ta gi Second, because they ali meet the pr tion shauld be based on that difficult� "'chemistry" between the appiicant a Because the counciimembers knaw t organization, and the community mu they are more qualified ta make the < short, it is bad practice far the searcl any preEerences among the candidat� Written Statement of Conditions It is a good practice for the search fir council ta cIarify and decide all of th employrnent, to communicate these t and to get bath parties ta agree. The should then set down in writing all o including starting date, residency rec fringe benefits, leave time, memberst ence attendance, moving expenses, se sions, and periodic manager evaluati� understanding shauld be sent to the c the governing body for written appro paintment is announced. Depending � the desires a£ the candidaie and the c terms may be referred to an attorney in a mare forrnai and iegal document answer Eo that aII quaiified council and, � my chaice. ite, the selec- d the council. :mselves, the h better than I, �cision. In firm to indicate ; interviewed. n to get the conditians af the candidate, �arch firm the canditians, iirements, p dues, confer- �erance provi- �. This written �ndidate and al be£ore an ap- � state laws and �uncil, those 'ar ennbodiment Payment 1`he sine qua non of any code of good practice is that the onty payment for the search cam s from the ap- pointing autharity. Under na circumstances shou]d the s ceive any payrnent, express or irnplie plicant. This injunction includes fees candidates, resume preparation, find ture consulting contracts. ' rch firm re- from any ap- r advising , fees, and fu- CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �4 � T0: City Council FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Computer Acquisition and April 1, 1983 Larry Shaughnessy Treasurer As you are aware, we have spent considerable time over the pas several months preparing fo�r an eventual recommendation on computer-system ac uisition. We herewith submit that recommendation. i The initial and most basic step was in familiarizing ourselves with "computerage" -- a very foreign language. Once we became familiar wi h the basic terms, we studied magazines and brochures to become familiar wi h the features of the most popular micro-computers. We met with a Burnsvil e CPA who demonstrated use of an Apple II, several pieces of software and a dot- matrix printer. Since our meeting with him, he has installed an IBM- C, and advises us that it is a much better system. We contacted both Peat-M rwick- Mitchell and the Hennepin County Data Processing and Auditing departm nts for information on the IBM Personal Computer and software. In both cases the contact persons responded that of all the micro-computers they had in estigated, IBM is the best. A seminar given by Peat-Marwick-Mitchell and discus ions with vendors and computer industry professionals both reinforced our'decis on to pursue acquisition of the IBM and aided us in determining peripheral eeds. We-have therefore solicited several informal quotations from vendors. Because of City participation in the Hennepin County Joint Purchasing Agreeme t, we have received a quote which falls within the $2,500 earmarked (and as yet unused) in�both 1982 and 1983 for computer system acquisition. � We recommend your authorization to purchase an IBM Personal Cor monochrome screen, letter quality printer, two double-side disc�drive: three pieces of software from Computerland, Inc, through the Hennepin Joint Purchasing Agreement for an approximate cost of $5,000. We bel� that the system and software proposed will meet our assets accounting, processing, and information management needs both now and for many ye� the future and give us the capability of drastically expanding iur apF with little additional hardware expense. � uter, and ounty word s into ication �� � � a� C � � CZTY 0�' MENDOTA HEIGiiTS MEMO April 4, 1983 � To: r.�cy coun��i FROM: Dick Ploumen Public Works Supervisor SUBJECT: Bid Tabulation 1954 Dod�e Truck - Truck U�ilitv Box The following bids were received and opened on March 31st. 1954 Dodge Truck Mid-America Pipe Guy Kullander � �'�`� R.J. Weinzettel $ 90.00 214 , 00 140.Q0 Based an the abave bids received, i recommend that Guy Kullandll awarded the bid for the 1954 Dodge truck and R.J. Weinzettel be awardi bid for the utility box, ` : :. tilitv Box $1Q.00 23.50 ss.ao >r be �d the q�� V 1 ��� ✓ � l L� �s � t�-I ,� I�� k � S U�:� �� w I-I � �_�s i .. �,�....141W01WIIWLY4ALiLl.l'JLIIG�.JLLJ.r,1J.,�"rJ'JWLWJWiIII� i53' �� ���,1`3. � G'.-i:i_! i�;:.i .�� .. ��'dVI '. �� NMC� _ _ �-. - , � f[-�,� l�"3=, �r' �,�11-r,n� ' � �����o� S3 � ll 1��-1 ° ' - � �:',os.�r�. -r�- -, � _ - ,� , _ �,,�a'� --- _ . s�:�{,�oiri�;, yr.rs�-�a�l f/ _ - ---- - _ _ _ _ - __ --___ --� „�' `,"'G, ^ . -��^y � . � - - = , ,, - _ ---- - - ` ---- __ „ �' -, �'� „' -, `'� „�= - . � t� � -r. -� �r�.wi.. t � x"/d?R`�7 � I ' � �hdN'M. H`�IIN'j G Nn-� _ - �� � _ �-__—__ _ � '�_� _ �� ' ' =_ . - - . - ' _ _---- / _ �'�fi'?n�.V<f 53�11 ��� ^��� a rro�l�nr�� � , _---._ - � - ---_ - � —1��8 -�-- �3mnn7Nnc ).91d3-r `:.3��`�iZ' j�OW3>i.--=;'-_. .7 �-- - - �: -R"�8 `�� ..�-� . . �_ _�.�-/ i-_. _ _.`�"g_. ..... .-. "� I _' / . 2 ���-_ ._._ V �g�� ^ ( L�18 r .• �1'J30 in� �\.,- T ,-rn•a �9A�i3 v,�a � ���orr �n .ltdw3 sr��*saa �ooai -tan�-� �tN�,oa=, -� - -�,�..,�,-.�." _r��oa h; �a_ --_ r , ,,�,,� __ °I�R h'cllah3�� 9+��,^ ��' 9�E--- i �,, d- __ _ � 3 �fiOfl R7 ���g__ -� _-____ �._ . ,-___�- � - pr U/A i � f �8 �-- ' � � '� a�� _ _ -- - o[ ,9 l�:i<_; C�g Nnii�fn's-i� �a��� �L8 _ � 7�d-rS 3`��d2J�/ � I� _. ._ .'__._. .. . -._. . / I � 8 -. - � �,rs - -ft8 -- - --�_ � _ , Nl}Iv N � �4' c f'- £' �', � rt/ Y�-__ — ____- —o�g.�- -- - Jvir.3r i.�d j �`� N0�1Nn3�3 '�L{ n'; � 3n�n� !t3�� L� `J Ni�7�10 �1 ___--1�3n��� n i ; ,� / 1hnc.,y � N'�a��.�a 7 r > r A � � II'�Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll�lll0lil!!In�@IINII�III�IIIIII�InVlllllflll�96111�A miiiuimiiiiiiiiuuiiuiuii;uii!m� ��uuiiiiii���i�i�en�n�inii�i��iii�iii�niuuiiifium�am�mo��mmRai�m��