1983-03-01CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Dakata County, MinnesaCa
AGENDA
March l, 1983
1. Call ta Order.
2. Roll Call.
3. Apgroval of Minutes: February l, 19$3 and February I5, 1983.
4. Consent Calendar
e `
a. Legislative Summary and MeeCing Natice. '
b. Cade Enfarcement Monthly Report far February.
c. ApprovaZ of �he List of Claims.
d. Approval of General Contractor Licenses for: Robert W. Compt
E.D,S. Cons�ruc
5. Bid Opening: 1983 Tax Anticipation Certi€ica.tes. '� ,
6. Hearings: , � . ,
a. MH Associates application for Induatr�al Revelue Financing.
attached.} i:45 P,M. �,
7. Communicatians
a. Letter from Dakota County regarding County Board hearings att
turnbacks. .
b. Letter from Lower Minnesota Rzver Watershed District Board.
c. Letter f m Anthony Crea, Ramsey Countp, n Lilydale Park c
� �%~,�/� 6' �'1! .�P/°'"f � // � .r'`/J 7/I'����
8. Commisszan Reports
a. Planning Cammission Minutes, February 22, 19$3
b. Case No. $3-03, Dalglish -- Application far lat diuision. (Re
approval with conditions.) � •
c. Case No. 83-05, Henrich -- Applica�ion for'I.ot division.
with conditions,)
0
, Znc.
on Campany
ee �� �
� �.
unty Road
' s.
mmend
,
rnend approval �
d. Case Na. 83-07, Kegler -- Application for variance. •(Recommend ppraval.)
e. Case Na. $3-Q1, Parrartto -- Application for Zoning Ordinance ame dment.
(Reco�nend denial.} �
9. New Business 5 '
d. �J�/` �rrn i`7� /� ._.. /fj�'/�1,p�' FJ7" _�►
P ub 1 i c �! ,./ E f!` ���/!n �f c-r� �tr/� /� �%•�� jP%�/71'1 �'� �✓��i e'' f.��
r
Agenda � -2- Marcli 1, 1983
Ma or
a. Oral report on ivy Falls Steering Committee.
Report.)
b. Memo on Personnel Matters.
(Reaction to �easibility
� City Admini�trator � ' � " �
� -
a. Mill levy and Non-Ag tax levy comparison charts ..�n c�u�/� C 6 iis�jl� �js
o s��/ �� �'
b. Memo on old Fire Station,j epairs. ' �� �
c. A7�mo on Sg�c�,o ��-��4cr,�i�sE � i ii,�%.�/�Li. �`CGc/fe
Council Members � �a/ ��� ('o�,-, f,,? oy� }�G/,s� ` /C��1cih
Ci E .�r�JiFr�i . �
ty Attorney �, f fGG�O ( y �f���se�r� — ��G� ,/!%�� �a
Citq ' Eng ir►eer
a. Memo on proposed City of Mendota utility construction.
6. �8i�a�,�. C'ar'rc�����s
� Public WorkS Di'rector •
., ' � - . . Q . Fi /o7�-ff.�o,6 �'� f ss�'� /i��y.
' Citq' Clerk �. �,�// �9�m�� ,
10. Adjourn.�
� , / � i� !' � � � � i ,,
.
, . t , , / �. , �.�
. ,
� � - � � � .�' � �.- � �
. , ", i � : �
�' , � � � : / y
N I � � ,� /� �
� � ff �`
r' / /
, /��, /i/ / � ,
,. � ; ;, ,' � �
;; ,% ,,r �` ,� � ,
� � � / / � �.�. / , � '
/
�
r / � � � / f �
/
� �
/ / i
� ,. i • i .►
, ,
�� � � / � , �
�
_ � �/� �
,
, r 1
i !
� � � ` / - �•.i" / � - / ",
/� /` � ,1 / �► //i�/ x
� *� �
� �
��er-����yc=
E:I � s ^CC,i�I �l�'D
�� ;525,Q0(' Tax ilntici��7tion Certificates 1?^?
vX.•-�.� ��arcf� 1 , 1 �?.3
1�Ct'^rtt�T
�i�'rT Pt�7I�rY",Z �t�,i;Y.
`_'t. ^aul, '"inn.
n�'C!�'.IC^.h� ��^.7I��11'.L L�"FIY, ,? TR�1S7 C0.
� t a � d l! �, ••1 t! ti .- � 3`j-^ 1��1.�, ' lo.vt
��8-�3s� ,�,«
rI�'ST �l;�TinF1M1l_ �/!'•'Y
",i nneapol i s, t'i nn.
n n•�('.'.��R!�i+•'���
''inneapolis, "irn.
.�.�,�' .
_�� �
�?ate 1 i'iscatint ;` {
�2of �. 7 �s �° �I
Ct�st 1 g �'ate �
Pa
o c��
7
„�/� / -�' /, oz,� ' z � �-g� z.r
° -�' Z / o
.�j' . � D 6 P '- .
.�1. C'a o ��
C
�,
raK� ivu. tiuu
rebruary l, 1983
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Re�ular Meeting
Held Tuesday, February l, 1983
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the
City of Mendota Heights was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at the City H
Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
ity Council,
1, 750 South
Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P,M. The following
members were present: Mayor Lockwood, Councilmen Mertensotto and Har ann.
Councilman Losleben and CouncilwomanWitt had notified the Council th t they would
be late.
APPROVAL OF Councilman Hartmann moved approval of the minut s of the
MINUTES January 18th meeting as corrected. �
Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
CONSENT CALENDAR Councilman Mertensotto moved approval of the co sent calendar
as submitted and recommended for approval as part of the regular
agenda, along with authorization for execution of all necessary
documents contained therein.
Ayes:3
Nays:O
l. Acknowledgement of the minutes of the Octobe
January 11, 1983 Park Commission meetings.,
2. Acknowledgement of the Code Enforcment montY�
January.
3. Acknowledgement of the NDC-4 January 5th min
February 2nd agenda. .
4. Approval of the issuance of a Cigarette Lice
Gas and Towing.
5. Approval of the list of contractor licenses,
to:
H.W. Cook & Sons Concrete Licen;
Mon-Sons Inc. Concrete Licen;
F.M. Frattalone Excavating Excavating Lice
& Grading
Stocker Excavating Co. Excavating Lice
American Burner Service Gas Piping Lice
Arneson Heating Service Gas Piping Lice
Co.
Boehm Heating Company Gas Piping Lice
Hinding Co., Inc. Gas Piping Lice
Gentry Construction & General Contrac
Development, Inc.
Hanson Homes, Inc. General Contrac
J.H.L. Construction General Contrac
American Burner Service Heating & Air C
Boehm Heating Co. Heating & Air C
Hinding Co., Inc. Heating & Air C
Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
12, 1982 and
y report for
tes and
se to Fischer's
granting licenses
se
se
se
se
se
se
or's License
=or's License
=or's License
�nditioning License
�nditioning License
�nditioning License
Page Na. 1787.
February 1, ].983
I-35E NOISEWALL The Council acknocaledged a letter from Mr. Lawrence Grb, Mn/DOT
Noise and Air Quality Supervisor, regardin� installation of a
noa.se wall and mound along the west side of I-35� beCween
Wagon Wheel Trail and TH 110. Mr. Erb, present for the
discussian, stated that he met wiCh the praperty owners a,n the
vicinity of the proposed wall on December 2nd Ca explain the
proposal and received only one objection. He pointed aut that
Mn/DOT must get approvals fram all affected property owners before
construction can commence and will wor% wi�h the residents. Mr.
Erb reviewed a plan af the cambination treated wood noise wa11
( and eaxth moundzng praposal, and answered several Cauncil questions.
Af�er discussion, Mayor Lockwood moved the adoption of ResoluCion
Na. $3-10, "RESOLUTION REQUESTING NOISE A$ATEMENT WALL".
Ayes: 3 Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion.
Nays: 0
COMMISSIOlV Mayor Lockwood moved that Cameron ICruse, Joseph Stefani and
APPOINTMENTS William Burke be reappointed to three year terms on the Planning
COTt1Iri2SS10R.
Cauncilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
Dzscussion an appointments to the Park and Recreatian Commissian
was tabled to February 15th.
MISCELLANEOUS Mr. William Strub was present to request approval of a variance
ta allaw consideration of an applicatian far a P.iJ.D. on a
parcel containing less than 10 acres. Mr. Strub briefly
reviewed his proposed development plan for the constructian of a
condominium office complex on 5± acres of land located on TH 13.
Iie painted out that he wiZl not request any change in density.
He stated that NSP is the only praperty owner within 350 feet of
the site and that the developm�nt will affect no property owners
other �han NSP.
Cauncilman Losleben arrived at 8:1,2 o'clack P.M.
Administrator Johnson staCed that a commercial PUD would al.low
inr►ovaCive design work with no change in the density or use allowed
in the Zaning Ordinance.
After discussion, Councilman Mertensot�o moved Co approve the
application for a variance from the ten acre PUD site require-
` ment under the B--1 Zaning District regulations and density
requirement.
Council.man Hartmann seconded the mation.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
Abstain. l, Losleben
UNITED PROPERTTES Mr. Boyd Stafer and Mr. Mark Cella, fram United 1'roperties, were
presene ta request the Council to establish a public hearing to
consider the United Properries application for a$5 millian
Industri.aZ Revenue Financing Praject. Mr. SCofer briefly reviewed
�
Ayes: 4
Nays: Q
AIRPORT SAFETY
ZONES
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
�
Pa�e 1.7$2
February l, 1.9
the proposed office/warehause devel.opment proje t proposed to be
constructed an an $.25 aere site in the Mendota Heights Industria
Park.
Financial Advisor Shaughnessy explained the pro osed financing
method and recommended establishment of the hea ing.
i
After discussion, Councilman Mertensotto moved he adaption of
Resolution No. 83-11, "RESOLUTTON CALLING FQR A PUBLIC HEARING ON
PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMEN PROJECT PURSUANT
TO THE MINNESOTA MUNiCIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPM T ACT AND
AUTHORIZING THE 1'UBLICATION OF A NOTICE OF SAID HEARING," the
hearing to be conducted an March lst.
Councilwoman Witt arrived at $:35 o'clock P.M.
Mr. John Shardlow was present to review his mem regarding the
status of the airpor� saiety zoning process and ,7oi-n��Airport
Safety Zaning Board meetings. He stated that t e Board believes
that the length af the safety zones as establis ed by the Mn/DOT
Division af Aeranauti.cs is toa strict and that he tatal length
of the safety zones (Zone A and B) should be es ablished at 8,Q00
feet. He advised the Council that MnjDOT has s ggested that
the safety zones could be terminated at the rig t-of-way of
proposed T.H. 13. He believed, however, that b sed on pilot
testimony Co the Baard, that the bluffl3.ne shou d be the A zone
limitation. Mr. Shardlow advised the Council t at there are two
courses af action which may be followeci in arde to reduce the
length of the safety zones: adaption of special egislation by
the State Legislature or an administrati.ve chang in the rules by
Mn/DOT. Since the Mn/DOT administraf ive amendme t cauld take as
long as a year, he recommended that the Council irec� that
special legislata.on be draf ted to establish the luffline as the
end of the A zone.
After discussion, Councilznan Mertensotta moved t
Planner Shardlow's report, the City Gouncil dire
implemen.t the mechani.cs necessary for special le
by contacting the City's legislative represerztat
Iegislation to amend the proposed airport safety
Mayor Lockwoad seconded the mation.
DOWNTOWN MENDOTA City Planner Howard Dahlgren was present to disc�
HEIGflTS the Downtown Mendota Heights study. Mr. Dahlgre�
reviewed several drawings of the study area and �
questions and comments fram the Council. Iie rev:
potential schemes for the design and location of
emphasized the fact that the highway questians mi
befare the study can be fully developed,
at, based on
t staff �o
isla�ion
ves to iztitiate
zones.
ss the status af
presented and
esponded to
ewed several
T.H.I49 and
st be resolved
Page No. 1783
February 1, 1983 "
FIRE DEPARTMENT The Council acknowledged a letter from Assistant Fire Chief
Dale Peterson notifying the Council of h is intent to retire from
the Department on January 21st, along with a letter from the
Assistant Chief to the Administrator advising that he retired as
Assistant Chief on December 31, 1982. The Council also acknowledged
a written recommendation from the City Administrator that Fire
Marshal Lange be appointed Assistant Chief effecti�e on
January lst.
Councilman Mertensotto felt that Assistant Chief Peterson should
� be allowed to act as Assistant Chief until his retirement from the
Department and that appointment of a replacement should not be
made retroactively.
After discussion, Councilman Losleben moved that Fire Marshal
Eugene Lange be appointed Assistant Fire Chief effective on
February lst with full remuneration as Assistant Chief.
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
COMMENDATION The Council acknowledged a letter from the St. Anthony Fire Chief
commending Fire Captain Marc Connolly for his assistance during an
emergency medical call.
ORDINANCE City Attorney Winthrop stated that an ordinance amendment adopted
AMENDMENT in 1979 to rezone a parcel of land on T.H. 13 (Strub property)
from B-lA to B-1 was incorrectly prepared, the end result being
an enacted ordinance which retained the original zoning rather
than the B-1 designation. He distributed copies of a proposed
resolution and ordinance to correct the ordinance to reflect the
Council's intended action.
Mayor Lockwood moved the adoption of Resolution No. 83-12,
"RESOLUTION CORRECTING ORDINANCE N0. 164".
Councilman Losleben seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Ordinance No. 199,
"ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS ZONING ORDINANCE."
Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PIPE LINE Public Works Director Danielson advised the Council of the need
AGREEMENT to enter into an agreement to cross under the Milwaukee Railroad
� tracks in order to construct water and sewer lines near the
Country Club Market warehouse as part of the MAC project. He noted
that execution of the agreement would commit the City to a$1650
payment in consideration of the right to cross the tracks.
Councilwoman Witt moved adoption of Resolution No. 83-13,
"RESOLUTION APPROVING PIPE LINE AGREEMENT TO CONSTRUCT WATER ANP
SEWER LINES ACROSS THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC
RAILROAD TRACKS."
Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
❑
Pa�� No. 1784
February l, 1983
IVY FALLS FIRST The Council acknowled�ed and briefly discussed feasibility
ADDITION report relative to bituminous street maintenanc in the Ivy Falls
rirst Addition area. It was the concensus of t e Council that
copies of the study should be sumitted to repre entatives of the
homeowners' association prior to establishment f a hearing, and
Mayor Lockwood volunteered to contact the assoc ation representativ
Councilman Mertensotto moved that the matter be directed to
Mayor Lockwood's attention and that further dis ussion be tabled
w to March lst.
� Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
STREET IMPROVEMENT The Council acknowledged receipt of a proposed esolution
POLICY relating to establishment of a street improveme t policy.
WATERMAIN Public Works D irector Danielson informed the Co ncil of a recent
ASSESSMENTS staff ineeting wherein the proposed assessments or the Wagon Wheel
Trail/I-35E watermain crossing project were dis ussed. He stated
that the general concensus of the staff inembers for several
reasons including apprehension over future coll ction of totally
deferred assessments, was to recommend that the properties involvec
be assessed for 100 feet of frontage at the pro osed rate and that
the balance of each assessment be deferred.
The Council expressed its general agreement witt} the recommendat
HOME BEAUTY SHOP Mayor Lockwood moved that Mrs. Elizabeth Mulcah be granted
a one-year renewal on her request to continue o erating a home
beauty shop at 670 - 2nd Avenue.
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5 �
Nays: 0
LIST OF CLAIMS Mayor Lockwood moved approval of the list of cl ims dated
February 1, 1983 and totalling $190,828.99.
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
LABOR NEGOTIATIONS The Council received and discussed a memo from he City Administrat
relative to the status of negotiations on the p lice labor
agreement. Administrator Johnson stated that t e recent mediation
resulted in a 6.6% (6% wage increase, $20/month insurance
� contribution increase) demand. He asked for di ection from the
� Council on whether to waiver from the 6% total ncrease stance.
After considerable discussion, Mayor Lockwood m ved
the offer of 6.6% to the Police Department for 983.
The motion died for lack of second.
to conf irm
1'1ge 1785 '
Fehruary 1, 1983
ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council,
Councilman Hartmann moved that the meeting be adjourned.
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: S
Nays: 0
ATTEST:
Robert G. Lockwood
Mayor
�,
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:55 o'clock P.M.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
l
L u�;� �,�. .,.,�.,
I'ebruary 15, 1983
CITY OF M�NDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, February 15, 1983
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the
City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M, at the City
Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
ty Council,
1, 750 South
Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P,M. The ollowing members
were present: Ma.yor Lockwood, Councilmen Hartmann, Losleben and Merte sotto.
Councilwoman Witt had notified the Council thatshe would be late.
CONSENT CALENDAR Councilman Losleben moved approval of the consen calendar as
submitted and recommended for approval as part o the regular
agenda, along with authorization for execution o all necessary.
documents contained therein.
` Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
ABATEMENT
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
1. Acknowledgedment of a summary of the Dakota
Racing Committee meeting.
2. Acknowledgement of the Fire Department and T
reports for January.
3. Acknowledgement of the minutes of the Februa
Recreation Commission meeting.
4. Acknowledgement of a Dakota County Tribune a
return of County roads to cities and townshi
5. Approval of the List of Claims dated Februar
totalling $72,989.75.
6. Approval of the list of licenses, granting c
licenses to:
Rauchwarter, Inc.
St. Paul Utilities, Inc.
Fredrickson Heating & Air
Conditioning
Amcon Corporation
Atlas Pile Driving Co.
Peterson Maintenance
Corporation
Fredrickson Heating & Air
Conditioning
Excavating Licen
Excavating Licen
Gas Piping Licen
General Contract
General Contract
General Contract
Heating & Air
7. Approval of the issuance of a Rubbish Hauler
City Clean Up.
Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
ounty Ad-Hoc
er's monthly
8th Park and
ticle on the
s.
15, 1983 and
tractors'
License
License
License
iitioning License
License to
Assessor Bill Peterson was present to request Co ncil abatement
of taxes for Parcel No. 27-03600-010-50, the for er Mendota Water
Company water tank site which was transferred to the City in 1981.
After a brief discussion, Councilman Hartmann mo ed to approve
an abatement of the 1982 taxes on Parcel No. 27- 3600-010-50.
Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion.
Page No. 1787 'y
February 15, 1983
COMMISSION Mayor Lockwood stated that he has eontacted the two Park Commission
APPOINTNIENTS members whose terms expired on January 31st, Dorothy McMonigal and
Gary Gustafson. Mrs. McMonigal expressed her desire to be re-
appointed to the Commission, however, Mr. Gustafson preferred n�
to be reappointed. Mayor Lockwood noted that he had not received
the names of candidates from members of the Council, but that Mrs.
Marsha Knittig, 524 Staples Avenue, has expressed an interest in
serving on the Commission.
� Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
�yes: 4
Nays: 0
Councilman Losleben moved that Mrs. Dorothy McMonigal be reappointed
to a three year term on the Park and Recreation Commission.
Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion.
Mayor Lockwood moved that Mrs. Marsha Knittig be appointed to serve
a three year term on the Park and�Recreation Co�nission.
COMPLAINT The Council acknowledged a letter expressing complaints about
the operation of a rubbish hauling business in a residential
district, at 2400 Dodd Road. As part of the discussion, it was
noted that the Zoning Ordinance does not allow storage of vehicles
in excess of l� tons to be stored in residential garages.
After discussion, staff was directed to�invite the owner of 2400
Dodd Road to attend a Council meeting to discuss the complaint about
parking commercial vehicles in a residential district.
Councilwoman Witt arrived at 8:08 o'clock P.M.
MISCELLANEOUS The Council acknowledged a letter from Mr. Norm Hendrickson,
requesting a determination on whether a crank-up, self-supporting
antenna tower for amateur radio use would be allowed in a resid-
ential district. It was noted by the Council that while the 21'
retracted state would conform to the Zoning Ordinance height
limitation, the extended position of the antenna while in use
would not conform.
The Council acknowledged the suggestion by the Public Works
Director that perhaps an ordinance revision to address antennas
and wind generators should be drafted. Councilman Mertensotto
expressed the concern that such a draft ordinance should address
aesthetics and other concerns and should establish a set of
criteria which must be met.
Staff was directed to solicit and research sample ordinances
relating to antennae and wind generators.
ANNUAL REPORTS Assistant Fire Ch ief Gene Lange reviewed and answered Council
questions relating�to the 1982 Annual Fire Department Report.
As part of the discussion, the Council expressed cdncern over the
reduction in the size of the department because of recent, and
potential future, retirements. The Council directed Assistant
Chief Lange to discuss with the Department members the possible
need to increase the size of the department over that wHich is
currently authorized by Ordinance, and to prepare a projection
for the future which reflects the impact of retirements.
C+
.
<
Pa�e No. 1788
February 15, 1983
Police Chief Delmont reviewed and answered Coun il questions
regarding the 1982 Police Department Annual Rep rt. Chief
Delmont also reported to the Council on the dif iculties involved
in enforcement of the snowmobile regulations.
CABLE COMMISSION Northern Dakota County Cable Communications Co ission Chairman,
Dave Zemke, was present to report to the Counci on the Commission
activities relative to the draft franchise ordi ance and Request
for Proposals process. He informed the Council that copies of an
executive summary of the preliminary ordinance, as well as copies
of the RFP, will be distributed to each Council member, and
asked whether the Council would like to invite he NDC-4
consultants to attend a meeting to discuss the reliminary ordinanc
The Council members indicated that they would s udy the executive
summary and advise Mr. Zemke on the need for an appearance by the
consultants.
ST. PETER'S CHURCH Councilman Losleben, speaking on behalf of St. eter's Church, stat
that the Church's on-site sewage system is in p or repair and that
St. Peter's would like to be included in a stud for extension of
sewer service after development of the Mendota tility system.
City Engineer Kishel was directed to contact To tz, King, Duvall,
and Anderson relative to the status of the Mend ta study and to
prepare an estimate of the cost of feasibility tudy preparation.
- COMMENDATIONS Councilwoman Witt moved the adoption of Resolut on No. 83-15,
"RESOLUTION COMMENDING DALE S. PETERSON FOR OUT TANDING SERVICE",
as member and Assistant Chief'on the �olunteer ire Department.
Councilman Losleben seconded the motion.
Ayes:
Nays:
Ayes:
Nays:
5
0
5
0
Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Resol tion N0.83-16,
"RESOLUTION COMMENDING WILL C. WACHTLER FOR OUT TANDING SERVICE",
as member of the Volunteer Fire Department.
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
AIRPORT SAFETY City Administrator Johnson stated that he has m
ZONING John Shardlow, along with City of Eagan represe
John Voss and Dale Runkle, relative to potentia
the airport safety zone regulations. He noted
questioned the advisability of special legislat
recommended by John Shardlow on February lst.
amount of discussion amongst staff people, Mr.
concerning administrative rule changes prevaile
Johnson suggested to the Council that the matte
legislation be delayed for several weeks pendin
success with Mn/DOT personnel in promoting rule
_ administrative process.
t with Planner
tatives Tom Hedges:
amendment of
hat John Voss
on, as had been '
fter a considerable
oss`s thoughts i
. Administrator
of special
Mr. Voss's
changes via
MISCELLANEOUS Administrator Johnson informed the Council that Mr. Wes Lane had
contacted him, requesting Council support for h s interest in
appointment as Metropolitan Council District Re resentative.
The Council concensus was that it would continu to support the
reappointment of Mrs. Kathy Ridder.
1'age ].7t3�
relaruary 15, 19$3
,�
LABOIt NEGOTIATZONS The Council discussed a memo from the City Administrator relative
to the status of Public Works labar agreement negotiations.
The Cauncil.rioted the demand for an overall 6.45% increase and
reiterated its stance on a 6% maxi.mum increase for all departmenLs.
No action was taken on the matter.
MI S C ELLAN EOiTS
MAC AREA
IMPROVEMENTS
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PUBLIC WORKS
EQUIPMENT
Ayes: 4
Nays: 1 Mertensotto
CRAY RESEARCH
WATERMAIN
AGREEMENT
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Council.woman Witt invited the Council members to attend a
legislative breakfast meeting to be he].d on March 4th.
Engineer Kishel presented and reviewed the plans and specifications
for the MAC area publ.ic imgroveinent pro�ect.
Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Resolution No. 83-1.7,
"RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAZ PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORiZING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS AND ORDERING CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE THE M.A.C. AREA AND ADJACENT AREAS."
Councilman Mertensot�o seconded the motion.
The Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from the Public
Warks �upervisor requesting authorization to solicit informal
bids for the purchase of a small �racto� and accessories.
Counczlwoman Wi.�t moved to au�horize staff to solicit informal
quotations for the proposed equipment.
Mavor Lockwaod seconded the motion.
On the recommendatian of the Public Worlcs Direc�ar, Councilwoman
Witt moved �o authari.ze the Mayor and Cl.erk ta execu�e an
agreement with the S�. Paul Water Department and Cray Research
ta accept a public easement from Cray Reseazch for watermain
purposes.
Mayor Lockwoad seconded the motion.
SURCHARGE The Council acknowledged and discussed a memo and proposed
AGREEMENT resolutian fram the City Clerk recomntending authorization for
execution o� an amendment to �he St. Paul Water Department/City
agreement far collec�ion af the 10% water surcharge. Councilman
Mertensotto felt that the agreement termination shoul.d coincide
with the date stipulated in the water service agreement rather
than December 31, 1999.
After discussion, Councilman Mertensatto moved Co request that
the St. Pau]. Water Department prepare an amendment to the Water
Surcharge Agreement to provide for an extensian of the agreement
to Octaber 24, 1983.
Councilwoman WiCt seconded the motion.
Ayes: S
Nay s : 0
BOARD OF REVIEW
MISCELLANEOUS
ADJOURN
Ayes:S
� Nays:O
ATTEST:
Robert G. Lockwood
Mayor
Pzge No. 1790
rebruary 15, 1983 '
I� was the concensus oL- the Council that the an ual Board of
Review be conducted at 7:30 P.M. on June 14th.
The City Clerk reported on the status of the mi ro-computer
selection process.
There being no further business to come before he Council,
Councilman Losleben moved that the meeting be a journed.
Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:45 o'clock P.M.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
m
a
CITY OF NIENDO'rA HEIGHTS
Dear Mayor, Council and City Administrator,
February�
�Enclosed is the legislative summary for February 11 and 18. Highlighte
Governor Perpich's Budget Proposal and its potential effect on the citi
League of Cities is also requesting that you take particular note of tt
Requirements For Liquor Licenses HF 223 and the Volunteer Ambulance Re
Association SF 223 - neither of which would be good for the cities.
23, 1983
i is
es . The
� Bond
lief
Representatives Halberg, Seaberg and McKasy will be attending the Brea fast
Meeting, Friday, March 4, as will Senator Knutson. We hope that many f you
will be able to attend this get-acquainted session with your legislato s. We
plan to schedule future meetings in different locations in order to al eviate
the driving burden for some of you. . .
� The Breakfast Session is scheduled for 7:30 a.m. at the Pannekoeken
S. Robert Street in West St. Paul. Hope to see you there. '
Sincerely,
�f�
Liz Witt
League Legislative•Coordinator
�, 1505
I
�
Le�islative S�unmas�y
The League of PZinnesota Cities sends out a weekly�Le�islative �lletin o member
cities. The following are highli�;hts fY�om the weeks endin� Februazy 11 and 18.
I.ncal Goverru:�ent Aid (LGA)
Governor Perpich addressed the IAcal Goverrnnent Aid in his recent budgP proposal.
i�e would : 1. Elimina.te all of the �andfather clauses arci the minim�un ncrease
provisions of the current aid forrmzla; .
2. Set a maximtian increase so that no city w�ould get more th a 6�
increa.se in aid in ar�y one year;
3. 'Ihe distribution of local Povernment aid funds �vould be o the
basis of a need/capacity formula Vrhich is a modification of the current formula.
Preliminary fi�.ires of the impact the proposed formula would have on Di�trict 38
cities are as follows:
Bux�nsville
�an
Lilydale
Mendota
Mendota Hei�hts
Proposed
$1,102,518
321, �+33
s�lo2
17�+, 927
IQ83
$1,286,926
356,380
8,103
8,877
251,225
In general, those cities with high equa.lized assessed va.luatians are
to experience cuts in local aid. �'he proposal does allow ar�y city w:
cuts in 1984 to levy and make up for lost flulds.
Levy Limits
The Governor's pr000sal would continue lew limits for all cities with
1. There would be a levy limit �ase consisting of 1983 levy limit and
,408 -
,9�7 -
,103 -
225 +
,2Q8 -
most likely
receives
cha.nges :
1983 LGA.
2. 7he levy limit base w�ould increase annually by an index factor whic reflects
inflation costs of local goverr�nent. (The flat 8a would no longer p�y.)
Cities would be able to "bank" increases in their levy limits.
3• The pronosal ties levy limits and local government aid so tha.t a
aid could be made up by an increase in levy limits.
Shared Risk Proposal
If there is a shortfall some monies would come irom state reserves. SJ
of the rest would be from a risk-sharinp; pool in which schools, cities:
and the homestead credit would be included. Forty per cet�t would coqae
�oups. i.e.. a.�encies individuals, entitlements. etc. ZYiose in the :
pool would receive a$�0 million cut for each $100 million shortfall.
would be made on the basis of operating bucigets rather than on the shai
fl.inds .
e in
ty per cent
counties
rom Arotected
.sk-sharine:
he cuts
of state
0
u�rIInary of m�jor bills of interest to District 38 municipalities:
1. 4JASTE DISPOSAL-HF 174. This bill would amend existing law to prohibit placing
a facility for processing or disposal of solid or hazarcious waste on agricultural land.
2. TAX F�TION OF PROP�'I'Y FOR F[TI'URE DEVEIAPN1b�FI' .�' 153 •�s bill V�ould allow
qua.lified non=profit organi�ations (those whose pur�ose is to improve and develop
a Minnesota. city) to hold property for later resale for economic develotxnent
purposes and that property would be tax exemnt.
3. STORM SEWER FINANCING-SF 219. This bill is supported by the League and it would
a11ow cities to build, repair and improve storm sewer systems including r�a,ins,
holding areas and ponds for collection and disposal of storm water. The local
g+�vernment could impose charges for the sue of storm sewer facilities in order to z�a,y
for construction, repair and improvement of those facilities.
4. BOND REQUIRF�"�'.NI'S FOR LIRUOR LICEPISES-NF 223. ��Tould increase to $10,000
the amount of bond applicants need for on-sale and off-sale licenses and tha.t the
sta.te w�ould be the beneficiary of the bond. Therefore, although the amount of
bond increases, the municipality ma.y lose ar�y protection that it now ha.s, e.�;.,
the state m�y have prior rights with regard to such obligation as payment of state �
taxes or license fees. '
5. II�IAYF� I�ALTH CWERAGE AF"_�R A��fORKBRS' CU�1P Il��IiJRY-SF 15� . Z�Jould prohibit
termination of covera�e for emQloyees who lose their jobs as a result of
persona.l injury covered by workers' compensation. Zhe �nployer would provide
coverage for the period of total disability, up to one year, if the in;�ured
employee continues to pay his share of the premiu�ns.
6. MODIFIF.S WORKERS' COMP COVF..RAGE EVIDENC�I-�' 216. Would have only state
licensing agencies withholding a license or permit. 'Ihe cities would need
evidence of workers coarip coverage only when they enter'into a contract for public
work. �e bill would also provide that the licensing section would not create
a liability on the part of goverrnnental subdivisions to pay workers workers'
comp benefits or to indemnif� at�yone who pays workers' corr� benefits. 'Ihi.s bill is
stt�ported by the League.
7. WORKF.RS' CL�'�' R��aRITE- HF 310. Would make Minnesota, system sir�ilar to
Florida's, which is based on �,ra,�e-loss concent rather than a sta.tutory schedule.
Zhe prestur�ption tha.t "police and fYrefighters' heart and lung disease" are joh
related would be eliminated. "
8. OFF-SAL� LIQUOR LICENSE FEF-sr� 56. An amenc�ne:�t to this bill �rwould remove the
statutory ma.xir.nu:i on off-sale liquor licenses . Ri�ht now Minnesota Sta.tutes limit
the amount cities can charge and these maximums have not increased since 19u�.
�he League would like to rer.�ove the maximwns and leave the fee amount to the local
government. At th� present time the cities can set the license fee for on-sale
liquor but must show a reasona.ble relationship between costs involved and the fee.
9. VOLUNTF.�t ANBUr�A,'JCE RELIEF ASSOCIA^'IONS-SF 229. Would allow creation of
volunteer ambulance relief associations. Aut, under the bill, the cities �rould
have no control over creation of the associations or benefit increases. There
would also be more ong;oing; administrative functions. Zhe Lea�ue feels this bill is
had for the cities and tna.t Ambulance Relief Associations are not necessary.
M.�..�
DATE; February 24, 19$3
T0: City Council
FROM: Paul R. Berg
Code Enforcement Officer
S;:,BJECT: Building Activity Report �or February, 1983
CURFtENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE - 1983
NQ. VALt7ATION FEE COLLECTED NQ. VALUATIC}N FEE COLLEC2`ED
'3LUG PEF�IITS
SFD 1 $124,403.91 $ 817.58 2 $265,110.51 $1.,701.16
C/I 4 0 0 1 500.00 I0.00
AIISC, 1 12,000.00 152.63 3 15,000.00 246.51
Sub Total 2 $135,403.91 $ 970.21 6 $2$0,610.51 $1,957.67
TRD PER.MITS
Plbg �. $ 29.00 3 $ 75.00
Wtr 1 5,Od 1 5.00
Swr 3 52.50 3 52.50
Htg, AC
& Gas Pipe 3 233.50 7 488.50
Sub intal 8 $ 320.00 14 $ 627..00
LIC:ENSING
Contractor's
Licenses 2I $ 525.00 126 $3,150.00
..;,. ,
TOTAL 31 $136,403.91 $1,315.21 � 146 $280,610.51 $5,728.6'7"'
YEAF2 TO DATE - 1982
NO. VALUATIQN FEE CQLLEC2'ED
8 $ 728,464.06 $ 5,301.46
3 2�502�450.C}d 10,65b.95
4 17,300.00 260.76
15 $3,248,214.06 $16,219.17
7
7
7
18
39
104
$ 20$.00
35.00
122.50
1,058.50
$ 1,424.00
.�ri ••
158 $3,248,214.06 $21,243.17
[10TE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac and 8tate Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect anly permit, plan check fee and
valuation amaunts.
ir �.�+irsi��rr� rnw���r irr�s
��,/1/83 CLJ1Ih7S LIST
; aa��J",T
,no
.on k
1��.83
1b7.�i3 *�
4;�D.DO
4�O.DQ *�
75.0�
75.00 */
�F35.0[3
1R5.00 *�
4f3.30
6.�8
55.[?8 * /
91 .44
91 .44 *�
�02.00
102.00 */
5 .00
5.00 */
90.00
9D.00 *�
pz.so
82.50 *�
b.67
b.b7
1 S.Ofl
6.66
35.00 */
85.32
85.33
85.33
85.32
341 .30 */
Dept 10-1ldmin
15-Etlyr
20-Police
CHECK R� GiST��i 30-I'ire
V•-NOG� ?TEH D���KiPTrG�v
CiTY NH �C DU "JD
R�PL� P�I SH PC
ACTIO N COURTS IN� T�NNIS NETS
PCL CH SPG TRNG
�'roVT TR S 4'+s�T� ,
IIµC CONF REGR ANNL CONF K S�IANSON
De}�t U-Rd& Bridges
O-Ut111�1E'S
0-Parks
0-Planning
0-Animal Control
�CCOUNT N0. :!
CAFITOL SUP�LY CO
CAQI7 GL SUPPLY CO
MICW=�T I�H�LESALE
NINN WRTcF�WL ASSV
iMUNICI-PALS A�Sh
l� CNA RD PERft CN
REDDIhGS MARIN= INC
STAT�' MN DEPT �&I
STATE NN �EPT l&I
STA7E 'MN t7EPT L8I
STATt MN dEPT L8I
SNpP GN TOOLS
SNAP CN TOOLS
SNpP ON TJOLS
SNpP CN T�OLS
A.IR LINc.S
AiR LI�itS
TIRtS
I�OOD DUCK BOX;S
7983DUcS
PLCWI NG 2/3
WENCHtS
BOILEP. EXcMP CERT
BOIL�R �X=MP CERT
BCILER �XcMP CERT
BC.IL�R EXEMP CERT
MISC SPLYS
M I SC SPL YS
MISC SPLYS
MISC S�LYS
96b.97 AIR CCMM iNC LBR/P�RT.i SIREN#23
35 .00 L1 i R C CMM i NC MA R C C�'JTR
2D1.�T *�
0�-)021-000-OI
0)-43Q5-070-7(
D'f-4400-020-2(
D1-4400-11D-1 (
' . D7-433�-4b0-3C
Q'1-4330-460-3C
D1-433fl-44ti-2C
01-4345-070-7f
D1-44i�4-'1 �0-8{
fl�-4268-500-3C
D7-4305-070-7C
01-�.335-31D-S�
D9-4335-31D-7�
0'1-4335-3i5-3G
75-433�-37U-6C
01-43U5-030-3C
D1-4305-05D-513
1��-4305-070-7i�
15-4305-Oba-6C
��-4330-450-20
0�-4330-450-20
y.
:� `1�'J'; T
1 f? . 0 D
1�.00
3�.Q0 *.._
27ti76
b1.R0
42.5 i
205.54
143.06
13.00-
467.67 #�
hZ.03
9.98
1 5.7 5
7 . ] �3
.Z4.63
45.52
1b4.49 *i
12.38
�i.7_D
5 .63
z6.�1 �
11.40
12.20
3.04
127.73
31 .Eib-
122.5� �
6.37
22.22
28.59 */
1�76Z.5D
1,970.00
2�932.50 *�
90.')0 �
C��_Cx R�,?ST-2
U: N^u0?
ALEIiJcn��
ALFI'VSON
8&J AUTO S�LY
8&J AUTC �PLY
B&� A l�T C SPLY
H�J AUTC SPLY
B&J AUTC SP(.Y
F3�J AUTC ��'LY
C_TY I�OTQt? SUPPLY
C ITY MOTO� SUPPLY
C ITY Nt�TOft SUPPLY
CTTY NOTO� �UrPLY
C�TY MOT�R SUPPLY
CITY NOT�R SUP?LY
C�aST TO COAST
CCAST TC COAST
COAST TO C�AST
COPY �OUIF CO
COFY E�UIQ CO
Ct�FY EOUIP CC
COFY "cQUIi' CC
C�FY �OUI� CO
DANI�'LSON JAMES E
DANIELS�N JANES E
OCR CCP,P.
CCR CCRP.
C_r��!T� DrLM7"�T
i T�`1 ����? IP T? C`J
�NT P LAT=
SHT Y LAT=
MISC PARTS
MISC P�;RTS2295
P,�RTS 2295
BA TT�RY
BATT�RY/COR= DEP
CORE CR.EJIT
MI SC PARTS
MISC �ARTS
GATc.S P/S
MISC PARTS
CA�3L� Z295
MiSC PaRT� 2�95
MI SC SPLYS
� Ir� / FLA NG�
PA IN7 /SCREWS 2295
SOLV� NT
MISC SPLYS
DI�TZGEN PO�J�NCt
MISC•SPLYS
RETD MYLAR �HTS
FILM
JANIF�B MI
NARCH RENT
NARCH REtVT
NF,RCH MI
A C C 0 iJ CJ T Pi 0. I���
79-43D 5-�30� ,JO
�3-4305-8D8-00
0)-4330-490-SO
72-463�-000-00
72-4630-000-00
15-4330-4D0-60
15-4330-49D-60
15-4331�-49D-b0
0�-4333�-440-20
0�-4330-46D-30
0�-433fl-490-50
�'1-4330-490-70
12-4630-Di10-00
12-4b31�-000-00
01-43D5-070-70
��-4305-07�-70
a2-463D-DDD-00
05-4�3D0-1 05-� S
fl5-4300-i OS-1 S
t}5-4300-� OS-1 5
D5-430�-� OS-1 S
83-43Q5-SD8-DO
OS-4305-7 05-� S
D5-447 5-105-�5
i79- 42�i0-600-� 0
�5-42D0-6�]0-1 S
01-4415-020-20
j• -
°. !•'^, �I "; T
90.00 *
h9.00
h9.00 *�
10.Sb
4.40
1.�2
1 b.2� *,�
40.24
40.24 k�
1 35.00
] 3 S . 0 0 *,i
4.�9
4.�8
4 .08
4.09
4.Q8
4.08
24.5� *
1�030.97
'1 , 725 .00
143.80
575.UD
3, 473.97 *�
44.25
22.13
1 1 .D6
11.06
Fi$.50 *�
CHECK R=v?ST�R
V=►�OC� iTEM ��S��.PTIUh1
tXECUTQN� �YST=MS
KhUTH TOM
KNUTH TOM
KNUTH TOM
LA�,�ULA HJW'c
L�LS
L=EF �3�OS INC
LEEF EROS INC
�� EF BROS INC
Lc.EF BROS INC
LL EF BROS INC
l�EF �ROS INC
TELt RPR
FE B M I
EFEB MI
FE B M I
MI �C S�LYS
MAR UD W1!i
F�8 SVC
FE E S VC
FE 8 S VC
FE 8 S VC
FE E S UC
FE 8 S UC
LCGIS �A(t SVC
LGCIS CL 2 ASS�SS
L�JGIS JAA SVC
L CGIS C� 2 ASS=SS
M/A ASSOCIAT�S I�C ARTIC KL=cN
M/A ASSCCIATES I�C ARTIC KLEEN
M/n ASSOCIATES INC ARTIC KLEEN
N/A ASSCCTAT�"S I11C ARTIC KLE_N
ACCOi1�':T ;VC. :'r'V,
01-433D-49D-20; E
J5-447 5-105-1:
79-4415-802-0(
83-44� 5-808-01
01-43�5-03D-3{
Q1-2075-D00-0(
01-4335-31D-ST
01-4335-3�0- 5(
0�-4335-370-7[
01-4335-390-7�
� 5-43�35-3 �D- 6(
'15-4335-310-6[
�1-421 4-1 70-1 (
01-42� 4-� �D-1 {
15-4274-060-6[
1 S- 42� 4-D 60- 6�
01-43D5-020-2[
07-4305-050-5�I
01-4305-070-7(
15-43D5-060-6C
,,901.27 N�TRO WASTE C�VTROL NAt� IhSTALL I 15-4449-060-bC
7_Q•901 .27 * ✓
:; M � t! '+I �
26.1�3
Z5.18 *�-
35.9�
35.95 *
r
146.83
14b.?3 *
9 .8 4
3Fi.D0
47.84 f
46.F�
'i 34.44
943.1 R
4.�5
1�1T9,21 +,�
Z52.95
h2.1 2
128.82
250.72
4b,76
h.3.1 1
444.fa7
��259.7b� *�
Z9.?Q
29,70 *r
�S.ZZ
45.54
45.54
�iS.21
$5.22
45.53
392.26 }r
CNt��' �c�'r,r�T�`�
V��! �.�i ? I T c. �fi D� 5�. =t I P T:;3'd ;, C C G J fi�; T�10 . i t„
MII�EF—CAUZS CJ POCTiT s�TuSLI�Sl�AQ� 0�-43013-11u—li�l
MZiv{� EEi�EFIT ASSN NAR PR"cM O1-20?4—OL30-0��
M INN FI RE I�1C
N'� T�JR CL '� T_ NC
MOT03GLA INC
R�RTNE�?tL Si PC�bi�R CO
it�RTH�RN ST PO�SER C�
f�O4TN�R1� ST PGi��ii CO
R�R7t-�ER4� ST PQkE�i CC
N�R7H4f£ST�,RN BELL
NGRTHi�EST�r?N SELL
f1CRTHMESi�iiN BE�L
�;rRTH1►EST�RN 8�Ll.
NOR7HI�ESTTRN BELL
NORTHI»EST�.RN B�L�
NCRTNGEST�RN BtLL
GXYGEf� SERYxC� CC
PR ICE c�,ECTR IC INC
PR?CE cLECTR iC SNC
�� ICt ��.ECTR ZC iNC
FR I�E ELECFR IC iNC
P� IC� ELECTR IC ?tvC
�RIC� �LECTRIC INC
MI�C SPLYS
C!. ZP
RP RS
FEB SVC
FcE SVC
F�'8 SVC
FE � S VC
F� B S UC
F£B S t!C
�� B S VC
FE 8 S UC
F�B SUC
FEB SVC
FE B S VC
M�D OXY HYDR 0 TE ST
BA�L+�STS/tJINC NUT
G; LA MP
6E LA MP
8AlLAST5I�ING NUT
BAL�AST.SI4�INC NUT
GE LA MP
'D��4305-�3D-3�
0�-4330-45D-20
r��-����-�s�•zo
D]-421 )-3)S•3�0
�3-421�-420-50
01-&292-3�5•30
15-42i 1-4D' "C
D7-427 0-02D•?_0
0'5-42�0-050-5�3
01-429 0-t3?0-7�
o�-��� o-� �a-� o
01-42� Q-3�5-30
OS- 427 Q-'f OS-� 5
a 5-429 0-060-6t1
09-43(15-03C3-30
Oa-L33S-390-SO
Df»4335-310-SO
t}1-4.335-310-70
01-4335-3'JO-7D
15-4335-3��-;t?
15-4335-31C �
� '
u '�� � �J "; T
37.21
?1.84
59.�J5 k �
153,R3
153.83
153.83
153.�3
615.32 *�
35.00
3 5 . 0 D *.�.
71.15
71.'15 *�
69 .Z 5
69.7_S *,
1,2b0.f30
1 , 260.00 *;
1�095.16
9 , 095 .'1 6 *�
2,439.49
1,128.79
435,Oa
� 6.44
57.35
206.12
�D6.5�
37 4.�9
260.SR
67.83
S, 077.20 �-
2,055.h'f
59.74
115.73
48i.06
?59.48
rH=CK ��GI�T�k
V = P;'J r'
S&T OFFIC� PR��
SRT OFF ZC� PR�D
SAT}LLITE iNOUST i�VC
SATE�LT TE i�dDUST INC
SATFLIITE INDUST I�C
SATELLITE iNDUST I'VC
s�Lan�c�R �ua n_ c
5�11��J COR^�=R ACE HCw
SExTOV PRI�TI116 INC
SH pUG HlV=S SY L� JR
SOUTHVI�W CNEV�OLET
ST TREAS PERA
ST TREAS pERA
ST TR�AS PLRA
ST TRFAS PERA.
ST TREAS 'ERA
ST TREAS PEFtA
ST TR�AS �ERA
ST TREAS �ERA
�T TR�AS pERA
ST TREAS PER4
ST TREAS �S C�iN FU'VD
ST Tt�EAS 5S CON FUND
ST T�cAS SS CC:J FU�O
ST TR EAS SS C0� FUND
ST Tn Ea5 SS Ci:�'1 �U�O
?TE� O�S�RIPTi�'�1
M I SC SPL YS
PRON6 FAST=NcRS
R�NT MARIE A V
RcNT FR HILLS
REAT IUY FALLS
R��T W�NTNORTH
MAR MI
MI�C S�LYS 2295
MTCN CAKOS STR �JtPT
Fc6 TIME
TRUCK RPRS
PERA W/H P/E 2/17
PERA 2/11
PE RA 2 /7 �
QERA 2/7 7
PtRR 7/17
PERA 2/1�
PERA 2/19
PERA 2/71
PERA Z/� i
PERA 2/) �
FE 8 F ICA a/H
F� E F ICA
FE E F ICA
FEB FICA
r=E F�CH
Avt;OU!1T R�C. i.",1
01-4300-1 10- 1,0
OS- 43D 0- ] 05- ��5
01-4200-h]0-7�0
01-4200-610-7`0
D1-4200-670-7�0
01-4200-670-7D
0�-449 5-200-7��
72-4b3D-00[�-
D1-43i3 5-050-
D1-4220-1 32- 1
09-433�D-490-5
�7-21�b2-000-0
0'1-44Db-020-2
fl1-440b-021-2
�1-440b-030-3
0]-44fl6-04�-4
D1-44D6=050-5
fl7-440b-O�fl-7
��-4406-110-1
OS-44t�6-1 OS-1
15-4406-06D-6
01-2�63-D00-0
�Ja-4408-020-2
01-4408-D40-4
01-4408-OSO-S
01-440B-07D-7
���"',`U"JT
337.R�
635.59
160.72
4, 11 1 .22 *,_
i1.b0
1�.99
� 3.39
10.3s'
7.��
1b.5b
9t}.82 *
r
359.'1 7
$�w�3
45.R5
485.97 *
,i
125.00
�z5.00 �
�43,3b
22D.QIf
57.77
T20.00
5�7 . ? ]
72f1.00
718.7R *-/
"176.40
176.40 *�
22,��9.2�
2,464.94
25'1 .24
?_2,�i74.49
1 6.5h
zz.��
y 2.54-
C���K �=��ST=�
V,.�J�C".
ST Tri �AS �S CC�1 FU�D
ST TR�_AS "aS CO^! FUND
Si TR "t�S 35 CC"! FUi�C}
�U�� NEWS�AP� RS
sun ru�us�a���s
SUN �i�NSPdP�RS
SUA t+lEWSF.��=R�
SUt� NE�tS?AP�r�S
SUN NEWSPAPERS
UNrFORMS UNLIMIT�'0
UNIF�RMS UP+iL INI iED
UNIFOr�MS U�JLI�'i T�'0
U�ITED uAY-S7 PAUL
��5� hAi�'01lk� IAS CF3
NASH NATI�NAL iN5 CO
4�ASH .{1ATZt?NAI. It�� Ct3
GA�N ��TI��+lAL I�4 CO
WASH �ATIuNA� INS CO
t�ASH tVAZI�IEAL iNS CO
ZACKS I�;C
FUNO �1 3�JTAL
�UNC i35 TOTAL
�UNC 'tZ iOTAL
FUrlD 15 TOTAL'
FUNC 21 T{?TAL
r=UNC 79 TOTAL
�UNC3 83 TOTr1L
k7, �S?6.3D r cTa �
iT��t �va�nT_� TIO�
Fc G' F iCA
F'_� F.CA
r�8 FIC�I
GRD19$
STRtlB HRG NOT
GL�.NH�LL �0 '�RG N�T
OAI.GISH
H�NP,ICH H�G I��7
MN ASSOC HRG NOT
MISC C�OT!�ING
JA CK� T
MIMC S�LYS
MAR UF ul'r!
MA R I I�S �# IH
MAR PR�M
N:r�R P��.M
NAR PRc.M
MAR PR�M
MAR PR�MM
MISC SPLYS
accour,�T �vo. z :,v
Da-44C78-111 )
OS- 4408-105- � 5
15-440�-060-60
. [�]-4240-080-�L�
D1-4244-08Q-8'� '
i17-4240-D�0-8� '
01-4240-080-8C1 '
��'�`1LYUl�OU�OI/ i
2�-424D-000-00 '
Da-441� {�-D2D-ZO =
09-4410-020-20 '
D1-�.490-03D-3G `
li9-2D70-OOQ-f��}
01-2ii74-Ll�il=tl0
Iiy-4245-020-20
�1�-4Z45-029-20
0'1-4245-040-40
Oa-4245-QSD-5�0
D5- 424 S-'I OS- 1 5
01-43DD-050-5t1 I
.
MIINUAL CHECKS
,...,222
�aaa�
10224
1Q225
10226
10227
10228
�a.oa
I.,677.55
200.OQ
847.75
4,955.70
4,495.97
1$,242.47
30,429.44
$ 78,065»74
No Star ChapICBE
Mid Amer Pipe Cing
Daka�.a Cty St Bank
State Cap Cr Un
Dir Tnternal Rev
Comm of Revenue
Ci�y MH Pr Acct
GRAND 'F(?TAL
2/25 Mtg P. Berg
Ins Water Tank
Payrall Deductions 2j18 PR
,�
FIT WfH 2J18
SIT W/H February
Net P�yroll zfis
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL
FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Menc
will meet at the City Council Chambers, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendot
Minnesota, at 7:45 o'clock P.M, on Tuesday, March l, 1983, to conside
proposal of M H Associates, that the City assist in financing a proje
after described by the issuance of commercial development revenue bor
Description of Project
ta Heights
Heights,
the
t herein-
Project consists of the construction of three (3) office/wareho se buildings
with an aggregate square footage of approximately 100,000 square fee on approximately
8� acres of real estate located at the northeast corner of the inter ection of Pilot
Knob Road and Northland Drive in the City.
The estima.ted principal amount of bonds or other obligations wh�ch will be
issued in one or more series to finance this project is $5,000,000.
Said bonds or other obligations, if and when issued, will'not co stitute a
charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City and such bo ds or oblig-
ations will"not be a charge against the City's general credit or tax' g powers but
are payable from sums to be paid by M H Associates pursuant to a reve ue agreement.
A draft copy of the proposed application to the Commissioner of nergy, Planning
and Development, State of Minnesota, for approval of the project, tog ther with all
attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection rom 8:0.0 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the City Hall. •
At the time and place f ixed for said Public Hearing, the City C
City of Mendota Heights will give all persons who appear at the hear
to express their views with respect to the proposal.
Dated this lst day of February, 1983.
(BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL)
By Kathleen M. Swan
City Clerk
il of the
an opportunity
This Application must be submitted to the Commissioner in du�plicate.
STATE OF P1I NNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
BUSINESS SERVICES '
Application •
For Approval of �lunicipal Industrial Revenue Bond Projec
Da te
�
To:
Minnesota Department of Energy, Planning and Development
��sinpss �ervic�s
480 Cedar Street
St. Paul, h1N 55101
The governing body of Mendota Hei�hts , County of Dakota
!di nres�ta, her�by app � i zs tc th:. Cc� :;i ss i cn�r �f the Sta �� or A; �„r,2s
of Energy, Planning and Development, for approval of this community'
municipal Indusirial Revenue Bond Issue, as required by Section 7, S
Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes.
4Je have entered into prelininary discussions with:
Firm
Address
M H Associates C/o United
3500 West 80th Street
City Minneapolis State
State of i2oa���on Minnesota
0
ies
Minnesota 5543`.
Attorney Bruce Odlaug Address Ma.un Gre
Name of Project M H Associates Project S� Pa�
This firm is engaged primarily in (nature o� business):
of co�ranercial
The funds received from the sale of the Industrial Revenue Bonds wil
(general nature of project): construction of three (3) office/warehou
aggregate square footage of approxirnately 100,000 square feet in apprc
It will be located 3� at the Northeast corner of the intersection of
The total bond issue will be approximately S 5,000,000
toward paycnent of costs now estimated as follows:
Cost Item
��� and Site Development
Construction Contracts
Equipment Acquisition and Installation
Architectural and Engineering Fees
Legal Fees
Interest during Construction
Initial Bond Reserve
Contingencies
Bond Di scount
Other
, 1983
�a, �eNartr��rt
proposed
bdivision 7,
Simon, Johannes
� .. �
�
bn used to
� buildings with
mately 8 1/4 ac:
io be applied
Amount
S 50 000
3 700,000
-0- .
100,000
100,000
�
-0-
300,000
150.000
e
It is presently estimated that construction will begin on ar about April 1 v
19�3 , and will be completed on or abaut October , 19 $�� 1•lhen conpleted, �
there will be approxima�ely 225 new jabs created by the project at an annual
payroll of approximately � 3,400,000 based upon currently prevailing wages.
The ientative term af the financing is 30 years, corrmencing April 1 ,
7 � �3 .
The fai 1 awi ng exhi bi ts are furni shed a�i th thi s appi i cati on and are i rtcarporated
herein by reference:
1. An apinion of bond counsel thai the praposal canstitutes a project under
Minnesata Stat., Ghapter 474.02,
2. A copy of the city council resolution giving prelininary approval for the
issuance of its revenue bonds.
3. A camprehensive statement by the municipality.indicating how the project
satisfies the public purpose af tdinnesota Stat., Chapter 474.07.
4. A letter of intent io purchase the bond issue ar a letter canfirr�ing the _. .-
feasibility of the project from a financial standpoint. _
5. A siatemAnt, signed by the principal representative of the issuing
authority, io the effect ihat upon eniering inta the revenue agreement,
the information required by Minn. Stat., Ch• �74.01 Su�d.. 8 V1r31 be
submitted to the Department of Energy, Planning and Development.
6. A statement, signed by thp principal representative of the issuing
authority, that the groject daes nat includ� any property to be sold or
affixed to or consumed in the production of property for sale, and does
not include any hausing facility ta be rznted or used as a permanent residence.
7_ A statement, signed by the principal representative of the issuing authority,
that a public hearing ��ras canducted pursuant to tlinn. Stat_ 474.OI Subd. 7b.
The statement shaii inciude the date, time and place of ihe meeting and that
ali interested parties �rere afforded an opportunity to express their views,
8_ A copy of the notice of publication of the public hearing.
We, the undersigned, are du7y eiected representatives of Mendata Heigh�s ,
M7Cif1�50'td, and solicit your approval of this project at your earliest convenience so
that we may carry it to a finai canciusion.
Signed by: "(Principal Officers or �2epreser�iatives o� Issuir� ��4i o� �tyj
Ma,yor
Clerk
This approvai shail not be deemed ta be an approvai by the Corr�nissianer or the State
of the feasibility af the projec4 or the terms of the lease to be executed ar the
bonds to be issued therefor. -
Qa te of Approva 1
� The project is to be constructed in
three {3) Ahases carraner�cing April l, 1983, Gommissioner
with comp].etian of the final, phase in p�� n�esota Department of Energy, �
4etober of 1g85. Planning and Developmeni
RESOLUTION RECITII�IG A PROPOSAL FOR A
COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT,
GIVIIJG PRELIMIIJARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT
PURSUAI�TT TO THE tdII�R�TESOTA
MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVEIAPMENT ACT,
AUTHORIZIIdG THE SUBt9ISSION OF AN APPLICATION F(
APPROVAL OF SAID PROJECT TO THE COMMISSIONER
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, PLANNING Ai�iD
DEVEIAPMENT OF THE STATE OF MIIINESOTA,
Ai�TD AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF
NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS
II1 CONNECTION WITH SAID PROJECT
WHEREAS,
(a) The purpose of Chapter 474, Minne
Statutes, known as the_P�tinnesota Municipal Industrial
Development Act (the "Act"), as found and determined
legislature is to promote the welfare of the state by
active attraction and encouragement and developinent o
cally sound industry and commerce to prevent so far a
the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and area
chronic unemployment;
(b) Factors necessitating the active
and development of economically sound industry and co
the increasing concentration of population in the met
areas and the rapidly rising increase in the amount a
governmental services required to meet the needs of t
increased population and the need for development of
which will provide an adequate tax base to finance th
increased costs and access to employment opportunitie
population;
(c) The City Council of the City of Me
Heights ("the City") has received from Di H Associates,
partnership organized under the laws of the State of h
(the "Company"), a proposal that the City assist in fi
Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of
Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note or Notes (izere
referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonds") pur
the Act;
(d) The City desires to facilitate the
tive development of the community, retain and improve
base and help to provide the range of services and em�
opportunities required by the population; and the Pro:
assist the City in achieving those objectives. The P�
will help to increase assessed valuation of the City e
surrounding area and help maintain a positive relatior
between assessed valuation and debt and enhance the ir
reputation of the community;
-2 -
� the
he
economi-
possible
of
,erce are
�politan
cost of
nd use
e
fo�r such
dota
a
nnesota
ancing a
a
nafter
uant to
selec-
he tax
oyment
ct will
ject
hip
ge and
..i
{e} Company is currently engaged in the
business of the development and management of coci�nercial
praperties. The Projec� to be financec3 by the Revenue Bonds
consists of the construction of three (3) affice/warehouse
buiidings to be Iacated in �.he City, and wi.li resul.t in the em-
ployment of additional persans to work within �he new
facilities;
(f) The City has been advised b� representa-
�ives of the Campany that conventianal, commercial financing to
pay the capital cost of the Project is avai.lable anly an a
limi�ed basis and at such hzgh casts of borrawing that the
econamic feasibility of operating the Project would be signi-
�icantly reduced, but the Company has also advised this Council
that with the aid of municipal �inancing, a.nd its resulting law
borrowing cast, the Project is ecanamically more feasible;
(g) Pursuan� to a resolutian of the City
Council adopted on February �, 1983, a pub2ic hearing on the
Project was held on March l, 1983, after natice was published
and materia2s were made avai2able �ar public inspection at the
office o� the City Clerk in the Dakota Coun�y �tate Bank
Buil.ding, 75t} Sauth Plaza Drive, a].l as required by Minnesota
utatutes, Sectian 474.01, Subdivisian 7b, at which public
Y�earing all those appearing wha so desired ta speak were heard;
and
{h} No public official of the Gity has either a
direct or indirect fi.nancial. interest in the Project nor will
any pabla.c o�fici.al either directly or indirectly benefit
£inan�ially from the Praject. �
NOW, THEREF�RE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mendata Heights, Minnesata, as fallows;
1. The Council hereby gives preliminary approval to the
pxapasal of the.Company that the City undertake the Praject
pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Developrnent r'+,ct
( Chapter 474, Mi.nnescsta Statutes }, consisti.ng of the acqui--
sitian, construction and equipping af facilities within the
City pursuant to the Company's specifications suitable far the
aperations described above aand pursuant to a revenue agreement
between the City and Campany upan sueh te�s and conditions
with provi.sions for revision fram time �o time as necessary, sa
as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due,
the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bands a.n the �otal
principal amaunt of approximate].y $5,000,000 to be issued
pursuant to the Aet ta finance the acquisiti.on, constructian
and equipping of the Project; and said agreement may also
provide for the entire interest of the Ca�pany ther�in to be
mc,rtgaged to the purchaser o£ the Revenue Bonds; and the City
hereby undertakes preliminarily �o issue its Revenue Bands in
accordance with such terms and ccrnditions.
-3-
7. Nothing in this resolution or in the document
pared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure
municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues
from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for
pose. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a charge
encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or
the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to th
thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liabilit
on. The holder or holders of the Revenue Bonds shall
have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing po
the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Reven
or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof
any property of the City. The Revenue Bonds shall rec
substance that the Revenue�Bonds, including interest t
are payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledg
payment thereof. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitu
of the City within the meaning of any constitutional o
statutory limitation.
8. In anticipation of the approval by the Commis
the Department of �nergy, Planning and Development, an
issuance of the Revenue Bonds to finance all or a port
the Project, and in order that completion of the Proje
not be unduly delayed when approved, the Company is he
authorized to make such expenditures and advances towa
payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to
financed frorn the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds as the
considers necessary, including the use of interim, sho
financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds
Revenue Bonds if and when delivered but otherwise with
liability on the part of the City.
9. The actions of the City Clerk in causing publ
of�the public hearing and in describing the general na
the Project and estimating the principal amount of the
Bonds to be issued to finance the Project and in prepa
draft of the proposed application to the Commissioner
Department of Energy, Planning and Development, State
Minnesota, for approval of the Project, which has been
available for inspection by the public at the City Hal
and after t?ie publication of notice of the hearing, ar
respects ratified and confirmed.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of tdend
Heights, Minnesota, this lst day of March, 1983.
Attest:
City Clerk
-5-
Mayor
� pre-
�f any
derived
:his pur-
, lien or
Funds of
� payment
� there-
er of
e Bonds
against
te in
ereon,
d to the
e a debt
ioner of
of the
on of
t will
eby
be
Company
t-term
f the
ut
c notice
ure of
Revenue
ing a
f the
f rom
in all
� `4
2. On the basis of inforrnation avaiiable to this Council
it appears, and the Council hereby finds, that the Praject
canstitu�es properties, rea2 and personal, used or use�ul in
connection with one or more revenue praducing enterprises en-
gaged in any business within the meaning a� Subdivision Ia of
Section 474.Q2 af the Act; that th� Project furthers the
�urposes stated in �ection 474.n1, Minnesata Statutes; that the
availability of the financing under the Act and willingness o£
the City to furnish such financing will be a substantial
inducement to the Company to undertake the Project, and that
the effect af the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage
�he develapment af economicaliy sound industry and commerce, to
assist in the prevention of the emergence af blighted and
marginal land, to help prevent chronic unemplayment, to help
the City retain and improve the tax'base and ta provide the
range of service and employment apportunities reguired by the
population, to help prevent the movement of ta�ented and
educated persons out of the state and to areas within the State
where their services may not be as effectively used, ta pramote
more intensive development and use of land within and adjacent
to the City, and eventually to increase the tax,base of the
community . .
3. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by
�.he City subject to the appraval of the Praject by the Com-
rnissioner of the Department of �nergy, Plann.ing and Develop-
ment, and subject to final approvaZ by this Council, the
Company, and the purchaser esf the Revex�ue Bonds as to the ulti-
mate details of the financing af the Project.
4. In accordance with Subdivision 7a of Section 474.01,
Minnesota Statutes, the Mayor af the City is hereby authori.zed
and directed to submit the proposal for the Projec� to the
Commissioner af the Department af Energy, Planning and Develop-
ment, requesting his approval, and other ofEicers, employees
and agents of the City are hereby authorized ta provide the
Commissioner with such prel.iminar� infarmatian as he may
require.
5. The Company has agreed and it is hereby deterrnined
that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with
the £inancing of th� Praject, whether or nat the Project is
carried to campletian and whether ar no� approved by the
Commissianer of the Department af Energy, Planning and
Development, will be paid by the Co;npany.
6. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as
bond counsel, is autharized to assist i.n the preparation and
.review of necessary documen�.s relating to the Project, to
consult with the Ci.ty Attorney, the Campany and the purchaser
of the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities, interest rates and
ather terms and provisians af the Revenue Bonds and as to the
covenants and other �rovisians af the necessary documents and
to submit such dacuments to the Council for final approval.
-4-
��a z 7 ����
R
Z► �� .�1 +�1 �r.E� t�� �,► �� ,(�T �r i''
k DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1�60 HWY. 55 � HASTINGS. MINNE56TA 55033
lfT. rAu�.
MtLB. + *
MAtTINO
OAKOTII
� OUNTY
February 16, 1983
Mr. Orvil.le Jnhnson
City Administrator
City of M�ndota iieights
750 Plaxa Drive
Mendata Heights, MD1 5512Q
Re: Caunty Board Hearings on Turnbarks
Dear Mr. John�on:
As we discussed earlier �.his month, the County F3oard has directed
praceed with scheduling publia hearings for the jurisdictiaz� af
the praposed Turnback Program. While the C'�ainty Board is requir�
to hold a public hearing prior to �.urning a county road back to a
this is not required in the case of incarporated cities. Haa
County Board has chosen to follow similar pracedures for both town
cities in the c�unty.
The hearings for cities have been cflmbined into three separate 1
At �hese hearings, each ci�.y will be allocated a sp�cific ti
during which the Board will hear com�nts regarding that city,
time slot a�. each he�ring will be reserved for �he host ca.ty. Th
will �tend only as long as pec�ple are wishing to speak, up to a m
45 minutes . Therefore, anyone wishing �o c.�um�nt regarding this
should plan to be present a� the beg%nning of the allotted time per
The following hearing schedule affecting your ci�y was
Ccunty Board at their meeting an February I5, 1983.
DATE: Wedi�esday, May 25 j].983
L(�ATIQN:� Mendota Heights Caa.ncil Ct��ambcrs
AGEt�IDA: City a£ Lilyda].e from 7:00 ta 7:30 p�n
City o� Sunfish Lake fro�t 7:30 to 8:00 �n
Ca.ty of Inver Grove Heigh�.s frcxn 8:OQ to 8:45 gn
City o� Mendota Heights �rom 8:45 until end of di
AN EQUAL OPf�'4RTUNITY EMPLQYER
ERT P. SAtVDEEtV. P.E.
COI,INTY �'NGINEEFt
TELEPHONE:
G12-437•0399
��;�tc,� J
af� to
ted by
by law
nship,
r, the
ps and
pPriod
�e last
period
mum of
�t city
by the
�sion
February 16, 1983
Hearing Schedule: Page 2
This letter serves as confirmation of the scheduled hearing date. A legal
notice of the cities' turnback hearings will be published in the Dakota
Cou nty Tribune on April 7, 1983. Notice of the hearing will be served by
mail on each member of your City Council not less than 30 days prior to the
- hearing. A news release will be provided to local newspapers throughout
the county as each hearing date approaches.
Enclosed is a listing of the oounty highways which were identified in the
Dakota County Transportation Plan as "Patential Turnback Routes". A1so
shown are th e improvPments that w�uld be required to bring the road up to
the county standard for a conparable road, as recomcrended by the County
Engineer. The estimated costs of these improvements are also provided.
We would appreciate any effort you could make to see that the hearirig
schedule is understood by interested parties. If you have any questions,
please contact �re at 437-0398.
Sincerely,
�. •
Ann M. Hopkins
Technical Engineer
JURISDIGTION
APPLE VALLEY
APPLE VALLEY
APPIE VALLh'Y
BURNSVI .I T,F"
BURNSVTT.T.R
CAS'IZE ROCK TS
CASTI�E ROCK TS ,
CASTI�E ROCK Z5
C�15TLE ROGK TS
DOLIGLAS TS
DOUGLAS TS
FAGAN
FACAN
FAGAN
II�IRE TS
II�LRE TS
II�'IPIRE TS
ExJRF.KA TS
ATREKA TS
IIJREKA TS
FARNIING`I'ON
FARNLING`I�ON
GREENVALE TS
(zREEN�IALE TS
HAMP'I'ON TS
INVER GROVE HTS.
INVER GROVE HTS.
INVER GROVE HTS.
LAKE�Un�T.F
I�AK�,'VTr.T.F
LAKEVn.T.R
LAKEUn•T.F
LAKE�UTT �T.F
I�AKF.'VTT.T.F
LAKFUn.T.F
LAKE,Un.T.F
LILYDALE
NII�IINGER TS
RANDOLPH TS
ROSF�SOUISr
ROSF�10[7l�lr
SUI�'ISH LAKE
VERMILLION TS
WATERFORD TS
t�1TERFORD/9CIOTA
CR/
CSAH
M�
r�
••
�-
••
•�
••
•-
••
••
��
r•
��
w�
�.
�•
�•
i�
r�
k�
r•
r•
�•
M�
��
•�
r'
�-
r•
r'
•'
M'
r. `
r•
��
�•
••
••
r•
«�
r•
•�
��
-��. � �
•
38
38
40
7
34
78
80S
82
53N
76
93
63
63A
23
79
58
72
84
17
74A
64
74
21
90
83
28A
63
77
1
44
5
64A
64
64
5
46
45
16
87
83
38
38
18
81
92
53
RF,CO��NDED TURNBAQC SDGMF.[�TrS
Fd�ruarv 1, 1983
TII2MINI
11-23
23-GAL�AXIE
23-33
13-42
SOOTT-5
3-80
51-79
51-79
80-80S
82-91
61-260�i
149-30
149-63
13-32
66-190TH
3-BISCAYNE
3-81
SCa�r-17
80-84
Sarrr-9
W. LII�-31
31-3
90-96
SCO'I'T-23
47-86
ZWO LOOPS
55-149
TWO I,OOPS
SCO'I'r-70
46-5
64-MIN[QR�
64-23
SCOTT-50
50-E.LII�
SCClI'r-64
5-135
13-RAMSEY
43-149
42-42
86-88
71-42
DODo-3
63-3
79-50
3-53
86-47
LENGTH
IN MII�ES
1: 87
0 . 41
3 . 00
2.26
1.27
2.50
3.00
3.00
1.00
5.00
2 . 00
1.22
0.31
2.90
1.00
1.00
5.25
1.75
1.75
0 . 80
2.20
1.00
1.25
5.04
3.32
1.80
1.48
3.88
l. 48
1.54
2.00
0.75
3.27
2.07
1.53
0.64
1.72
1. 05
2.29
1.21
3.04
0.86
1.40
1.58
2. 25
2.36
93.30
- ��• i� � �
i' • ���y i�+
Nrne Raruired
overlav
None reo_uired
None reauired
Nane required
Gravel surface
Overlav/Gravel
Gravel surface
Overlav/Gravel
Gravel surface
Gravel surface
Sealcoat
Gravel surface
Overlav
Gravel surf ace
Gravel surface
Gravel surface
Gravel surface
Gravel surface
Gravel surface
Gravel surface
None rea_uired
Gravel surface
Gravel surface
Gravel surface
Sealcoat
Overlay
Sealcoat'�
Gravel surface
Overlav ,
Overlav '
Gravel surface
Sealcoat
Overlay
Gravel surface
Overlav
Gravel surf 1. ;
Overlay
Sa3lcoat
a
Gravel surface
Sealcoat
OverlaV
Gravel surface
Gravel surface
ESTIMATED OOST
(1983 $)
9 Mi.
0.00
13120.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
25000.00
74000.00
30000.00
21000.00
50000.00
20000.00
12800.00
3100.00
92800.00
10000.00
10000.00
52500.00
17500.00
17500.00
8000.00
22000.00
0.00
12500.00
50400.00
33200.00
18900.00
47360.00
40740.00
14800.00
49280.00
64000.00
7500.00
34335.00
21485.00
48960. 00
6400.00
55040.00
33600.00
12900.00
38720.00
31920.00
8600.00
14700.00
50560.00
22500.00
23600.00
� L227�320 . 00
Russell A. Sorenson
Jens Caspersen
Russell Heltne
Cyril B. Ess
William J. Jaeger, Jr.
Lawrence E. Samstad
Raymond A. Haik
Presiden�
Vice Presidenr
Treasurer
Secrelart�
Engrneer
Alrorne}�
�'ES 2 2 1983
Lower Minnesota River Waterslhed District
Mayor and City Council
City of Mendota Heights
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120
Dear Mayor and Council:
WARRI R OFFICE BUILDING
BURNSVIL E, MINNESOTA 55378
PLEASEIREPLY T0:
4344 I�S Center
Minnea olis, MN 55402
Feb
fY 18, 1983
The Board of Managers of the Lower Minnesota Riv r
Watershed District is commencing efforts to comply with the
provisions of Law� 1982., Chapter 509, commonly known as the
Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act. �'his Act re uires
an update and revision of existing watershed district p ans
and requires alternate methods for planning by municipa ities
and county governments.
The Ma.nagers have directed that we contact the m
palities of the Lower Minnesota River Watershed Distric
express the Managers' desire to coordinate their activi
with the municipalities. The Managers would like to ob
background information and details �ec�arding planning f�
face water management in your municipality. In that re�
the Managers would appreciate the City naming an indivi�
or individuals that can be contacted by the District to
tain information concern�ing your community's efforts to
ply with this new law. The engineer for the Lower Minn�
River Watershed District is Mr. Lawrence Samstad of the
Engineering Company in Cokato, Minnesota.
An appropriate response to this letter at your e
convenience would he appr�ciated.
RAH/kar
cc - Board of Managers
P�Ir. Lawrence E. Samstad
Very truly yours,
� �� �
Raymo d A. Haik, Attorney
for the Watershed Distr
ici-
to
es
r sur-
ard,
ual
ob-
com-
sota
Itasca
liest
t
February 22,1983
RAMSEY COUNTY
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTME�
1850 White Bear Avenue Telephone (612) 777-1
St. Paul, Minnesota 55109
Anthony J. Crea, Director
Bernard L. Edmonds, Asst. Dire
Mayor Robert G. Lockwood
City of Plendota Heights
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120
Dear Mr. Lockwood:
The Ramsey County Department of Parks and Recreation, and the City c
Department of Community Services have developed a proposal which mor
defines the role of each agency in operating and maintaining two met
regional parks which presently have split jurisdiction. The parks i
this proposal are Battle Creek Regional Park and Lilydale Regional F
A portion of Lilydale Regional Park falls within the boundaries of
of Mendota Heights and any action regarding this park will have an
your unit of government. Your attention is directed to the propose
lation which, if enacted, will provide for an adjustment in the mun
boundaries of the City of St. Paul to coincide with the southerly b
of Lilydale Regional Park. This proposal will alleviate jurisdicti
problems in enforcement a�hen the City of St. Paul takes over the op
responsibilities of the park.
1
�" •`' �i l t ;�:v',
�_ ., � J
St. Paul
clearly
opolitan
volved in
rk.
he City
mpact on
legis-
cipal
undaries
nal
rational
A joint nowers agreement providing for the exchange of lands will b placed
on the agenda of the Public Works, Recreation and Open Space Commit ee for
action at 7:30 a.m. on Monday, �1arch 7th in the County Board Roo of the
City Hall and Court House. The matter will be on the County Board genda at
10:00 a.m., �1onday, 14arch 14th in the Council Chambers of the Ci y Hall
and Court House.
Will you please review the enclosed material and let us kno�� of any
that you may have regarding this contemplated action. You may wish
at the Public l�lorks Committee or County Board meeting and express y
to the Commissioners.
Sincerely,
L�
Anthony J. Crea
Director
AJC:jjh
�nclosure
�o
concerns
to appear
�ur vi ews
-� - � �=RAMSEY COUNTY
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1850 White Bear Avenue � Telephone (612) 777-1361
�Y0°�� St. Paul, Minnesota 55109
Mthony J. Crea, Director
Bemard L. Edmonds, Asst. Director
February 2, 1983
Mr. James Van Houdt '
Acting Executive Director '
County of Ramsey
Suite 316 Court House
St. Paul, ��innesota 55102
Dear Mr. Van Houdt:
I am submitting herewith, a proposal which should substantially
improve the cost effectiveness of the operation and maintenance
of the Lilydale and Battle Creek Regional Parks. ,
I propose that the City of St. Paul and Ramsey County, as imple-
menting agencies operating within the Metropolitan Regional Park
System, adjust the boundaries of ownership and re-define their
operational responsibilities.
I recommend that the City, County and Metropolitan Council enter
into joint powers agreements for Battle Creek Park and Lilydale
which clearly establish the role of each agency, the land to be
exchanged and special conditions or agreements which must be
honored by each agency.
I have prepared the documentation for an agenda item to be placed
before the Public Works, Recreation and Open Space Committee on
March 7, 1983.
I request your approval and that of the County Board.
Sincerely,
�/I •
Ant ony J. Crea
Director
AJC:jjh
Enclosure
c.c. All Cor,�missioners
._;. • J
. • i �
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
T0: City Council
FROM: Orvil J. Johnson
City Administrator
SUBJECT: Lilydale Regional Park
Interesting proposal!
February 24, 1983
I would hope to have a better, clearer map for display on Tuesday
Note especially:
c on page 2 of the Agreement
7 on page 7 of the Agreement
What reaction, if any, do you want carried to the Hearings on March
��� e �� ���
1
g•
& 14th?
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
RAMSEY CO U NTY
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTM
1t50 White Bear Av�nue
St. P�ul, Minnesot� 55109
, T�lephone (612)
Mttwny J. Crea, Direi
Bemard L. Edmonds, Asst.
Anthony J. Crea,�Direct�r
Bernard L. Edmonds, Assistant Directo
Februarv 1. 1933
Exchange of Property
Ramsey County and the City of St. Paul are both implementing
in the Metropolitan Regional Park and OPen Space System. Twc
parks within the regional system have ownership and operatin�
bilities divided between the City and the County. it has bei
suggested that a joint powers agreement be enacted to bring �
exchange of land and responsibilities so that the role of eai
can be more realistically defined.
LILYDALE REGIONAL PARK
Lilydale Regional Park is made up of five segments: Lilydal
Cherokee Park, 66 acres; Harriet Island, 63 acres; connect
112 acres; and Navy Island, 3'acres; for a total of 529 acr
City of St. Paul is the owner and operating agency of Harrie
and Cherokee Park. Ramsey County operates and maintains the
Lilydale section of the park and holds fee title to all of t
except for five small parcels now in acquisition and except
land which was purchased by the Port Authority, deeded to th
St. Paul and subsequently turned over to Ramsey County for m
and operations under a 20-year agreement.
The confusion arising out of the split ownership and operati
bilities can be eliminated by Ramsey County deeding all of
in the Lilydale Regional Park over to the City of St. Paul a
having St. Paul assume responsibilities for the entire park.
of ownership and�responsibilities can be initiated through a
powers agreement which should take into consideration those
now in effect between Ramsey County and other agencies:
1. Existing Agreements
a) Police - City of Lilydale
b) Joint Powers Agreement - Lilydale/Dakota County
c) St. Paul Maintenance and Operation
d) Hang Gliders
2. Other specific items in which Ramsey County has had
continue to have an interest:
. o�
361
agencies
� of the
responsi-
ut the
agency
, 335 acres;
ng corridor,
s. The
Island
entire
at section
or the
City of
intenance
�g responsi-
its property
�d by
The transfer
joint
igreements
�Ramsey County
and may
A. J. Crea
-2-
a} Acquisition af re�aining parc�3s
b) �treet vacations
BATiLE CREEK REGIQNAL PRRK
Bati�e Creek Regiona3 Paric is
846 acres; Indian Mounds, 97
and Pigs Eye, 1,i58.6 acres;
regianal park.
made up of faur segments: Battie Creek,
acres; Fish Hatchery, 105.4 acres;
for a tatai of 2,207 acres in the
The Fish Hatchery and Mounds Park segments are owned and operated
by the City of St. Paul. The City of St. Paul alsa owns ],'t2U.9 acres
of the 1,158.6 acre Pigs Eye segment which 37.7 acres remain to be
acquired. The Battle Creek segment is in split ownership with 686.5
acres beionging to Ramsey County, 94.5 acres belanging io the City
of 5t. Paul, 36.8 acres belonging to the Minnesota Department of
Transpartatior�, and 28.3 acres remaining to be acqu.ired by Ramsey
County. There is no lagical definition of ownership or responsibility
under the present arrat�qement. .
As a remedy to this problem, it is praposed that the City of St, Paui
deed ali of its praperty in the Battie Creek segment over ta Ramsey
County as well as all of its property in the Pigs Eye 5egment. 7he
City woulci then own and aperate a1i of that partian of the park iying
westerly of Highway 61, except far the Pigs Eye segment, and the County
wouid owrt and operaie that portion of the park lyit�g easierly of
Nighway 61. After the completion of the propased Highway 61 realign-
meni, it is proposed ihat the Department of Transportation be requested
to turn over its excess Highway 61 right-af-way to Ramsey County as
a part of the Battle Creek Regional Park.
To initiate the transfer of ownership and responsibility, a joint
powers agreemeni between the City of St. Paul and Ramsey Caunty will
be necessary. As in the case of the proposed Lilydale exchange, the
joint pawers agreement musi reflect all existing agreements or oth�r
items of interest to Ramsey County and or the Gity of St. Paul.
1. Landscape Nursery
2. Ramsey, Washington,
Assessments
BLE; j jh
Metro Watershed Improvements and
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEt�IENT, Made and entered into by and bet�aeen the
CITY OF ST. PAUL, a municipal corporation of the State of
Minnesota, hereinafter called "CITY", and the COUNTY 0 RAMSEY,
a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, her inafter
called the "COUNTY";
WITNESSETH: .
WHEREAS, the CITY and COUNTY are authorized by l�w to
acquire, maintain and operate lands for park and open �space
. I
purposes; and
WHEREAS, the CITY and COUNTY have authority, pur�suant to
Minnesota Statutes �471.59 to enter into agreements fo"� the
joint or cooperative exercise of any power common to t em; and
WHEREAS, the CITY AND COUNTY wish to enter into joint
exercise of powers agreement so as to provicle that thel CITY
shall be responsible for the development, operation, aintenance
and control of the Lilydale Regional Park Complex, and that the
COUNTY shall be responsible for the development, oper tion,
maintenance and control of the Pigs Eye Lake, and all other
sections of Battle Creek Regional Park, except the Fi h Hatchery
Lake and Indian Mounds section of Battle Creek Region 1 Park
which the CITY shall develop, operate, maintain and cc}ntrol.
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY AI�D COUNTY
AS FOLOWS:
1. COUNTY Res onsibilities for Lil dale Re ion 1 Park.
The County shall have the following responsibilities ith
respect to Lilydale Regional Park:
0
0
a. The COUNTY shall within 90 days of the effective '�'
date of this agreement, convey by Quite Claim Deed
to the CITY fee title to all lands which it now owns
within the Lilydale Regional Park Co;nplex, as shown
on the attached Exhibit I. Conveyance of title by
the COULJTY shall be conditioned on the CITY's
maintenance of the.property as public park and open
space use consistent with the Metropolitan Council's
approved plan for recreational development of the
area.
b. The COUNTY shall act as the agent of the CITY and
shall acquire in the name of the CITY property
within the Lilydale Regional Park Complex until all
parcels in the Park have been acquired as indicated
on the attached ExY�ibit I.. The acquisition of these
properties shall take place in accordance with the
policies and procedures of the COUNTY at no expense
to the CITY.
c. The COUNTY has entered into an agreement with the
City of Lilydale dated July 27, 1981, whereby the
City of Lilydale provides police patrol and
protection for that portion of the Lilydale Regional
Park complex located within the City of Lilydale and
the County of Dakota for an annual sum of $26,000.
Contingent on this Agre^�-nent becoming effective
pursuant ta Paragraph 9, the COUt�TY shall
E
1
e
�
terminate its agreement with the City of L'lydale
for police patrol and protection services ffective
12/31/83 and the COUNTY shall have no res nsibility
to provide police patrol and protection se�vices for
Lilydale Regional Park after 12/31/83.
. d. The COUNTY agrees to provide financial ass stance to
,� the CITY for the maintenance and operation of the
' Lilydale Regional Park complex in an amoun not to .
' exceed $4,000 to be paid no later than 1/3 /84.
e. The COUNTY shall terminate its permit agre�ment with
Northern Sky�Gliders Association, Inc., da ed May
23, 1978 which is attached as Exhibit II, hich
, grants penaission for the establishment an �
operation.of hang gliding activities on a rtion of
the Lilydale Regional Park no later than 9 days
after the effective date of this agreement The
CITY may in its discretion enter into a si ilar
permit agreement.
2. CITY Res onsibilities for Lil dale Re ional ark.
The CITY shall have the following responsibilities witl� respect
to Lilydale Regional Park:
a. The CITY shall develop, operate, maintain nd
control the entire Lilydale Regional Park, as shown
on the attached map marked Exhibit I, as a public
park and open space consistent with the Me ropolitan
Council's approved plan for recreational d velopment
of the area.
3
m
b. The CITY shall develop, operate, maintain and
control the entire Lilydale Regional Park, as shown
on the attached map marked Exhibit I, as a public
park and open space cansistent with the terms and
intent of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement
dated September 28, 1972, by and between the County
of Ramsey, County of,Dakota, and the Village of
Lilydale, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit
III.
3. Termination_of Existing Agreement Between COUNTY and
CITY. The COUNTY.and CITY hereby mutually agree to terminate
the previous agreement between the CITY and COUNTY for
Lilydale-Harriet Island-Navy Island Regional Park complex, dated
October 4, 1977, which is attached hereto as Exhibit IV, upon
the effective date of this Ag�eement, as set forth in Paragraph 9.
4. COUNTY Resonsibilities�for Battle Creek Regional Park.
The COUNTY shall have the following responsi•bilities with
respect to Battle Creek Regional Park: .
a. The COUNTY shall develop, operate, maintain and
control the entire Battle Creek Regional Park
Complex, as shown on the attached map marked Exhibit
V which is made a part of this agreement, as public
park and open space consistent with the Metropolitan
Council's approved plan for recrational development
of the area. '
b. The COUNTY shall obtain approval in writing from the
CITY for the implementation of any policies, plans,
4
� development, canstructzon or alteration of the
Battle Creek Regianal Park property convey d by the
CITY to the COUNTY pursuant to this agreem nt.
5. CITY Res onsibilities for Battle Creek Re i nal Park.
The CITY shall have the following responsibi2ities wi h respect
to Battle Creek Regional Park:
a, �he CITY shall cantinue to operate and m inkain the
Indian Mounds Section and the Fish Hatch ry Iake
Section of Ba'ttle Creek Regianal Park, a shawn an
the attached map marked Exhibit V=
b. The CITY shall within 90 days of the ef ective date
,, of this agreement, eonvey by Quit Claim deed to the
CDUNTY fee title to all lands which it now owns
within the Pigs Eye Lake Section and B ttZe Creek
Section of the Battle Creek RegianaZ P rk, as shown
on the attached Exhihit V. Conveyanc o£ title by
the CITY shall be canditioned on the OUNTY's
mainteaance of the property as p�blic park and open
spece use consistent�with the Metrap Iitan Council'
approved plan for recreational devel pment of the
area,
c• The CITY shall obtain appraval in w iting from the
C011NTY for the implementation af an palicies,
plans, development, construction or alteration of
Indian Mounds and Fish Hatchery La e Sections of t�
Battle Creek Regional Park.
5
6. Payment of Special Assessments levied for Siarm Water
Improvements on Battle Creek Regional Park Property. The Ramsey
j�ashington Metro Watershed District has Ievied special
assessments against the praperty described in Exhibit V af this
agreement for storm water improvements for Battle Creek Project
No. l. The COUNTit shall make applicatian to the,Metropolitan
Council for the purpose of abtainin� funding for the impravement
and management of the Battle Creek RegionaZ Park complex,•which
application shall include a request for funds to be used to pay
the special assessments levied against the CIT� owned proPerty
described in Exhibit V£or Battle Creek Project No. 1. The sum
af the total estimated assessments levied against the property
is $904,994. Upon the condition that the Metropolitan Council
pravides funds to the CDUNTY to pay these assessments, the
COUNTY agrees to reimburse the CTTY for all previous and future
payments made by the CITY on account of the special assessrnents
levied by the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District'for
Bat��l.e Creek Project: No. l. The Gc�unty shal'. pay thesE
assessments with Metropolitan Council funds made available from
the Council's 19$3-1984 or subsequent Capital Improvemeni Plans.
If the Metropolitan Cauncil does not provide the County with
funds to pay the special assessments, the CITY hereby agrees pay
all special. assessments Ievied by the Ramsey Washington Metro
Watershed District for storm water impravements for Battle Cree'x
Project No. 1 against the property as shown an Exhibit V• The
COUNTY agrees to pay all. assessments levied against the praPerty
as shown on Exhibits V after the propert� is conveyed to the
0
a
COUNTY pursuant to the terms of this agreement. The CI�TY agrees
to pay all special assessments levied against the prop rty as
shown in Exhibit V which is not conveyed to the COU[�TY
7. Special Legislation�for Lilydale Regional Pa�k. The
CITY AND COUNTY Agree to jointly seek the enanctment of{ special
legislation at the 1983 session of the Minnesota Legis ature
which changes the boundaries so that all of Lilydale R gional
Park, as shown on Exhibit Z, shall be Iocated within t e
corporate limits of the City of St. Paul, and which wo ld
authorize the City to enact and enforce ordinances rgu ating the
property so acquired by the City.
8. Hold Harmless. The CITY and COUNTY each agr e to hold
the other party harmless for any.and all claims which rise out
of either the CITY's or COUNTY's acquistion, developme t,
operation, or maintenance of the Lilydale Regional Par or
Battle Creek Regional Park Property.
9. Effective Date. This agreement shall be eff ctive on
the nay after final enactment of the special legislati n
described in Paragraph 7 of this agreement; provided t at if the
special legislation is not enacted into law by June 1, 1983,
this agreement shall be terminated a:�d all obligations of each
party to this agreement shall be null and void.
10. Completeness of Agreement. This agreement
the complete agreement of the parties hereto and may
�ntains
ly be
modified or amended by a writing signed by both partie�.
,
IN WITNFSS WHEREOF, the parties have set their
7
nds on
the dates written below.
CITY OF SAINT PAUL:
By
Its Mayor Date
By
Director of Department of
Finance & Management �
Services /Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By ' �
Assistant Ci y Attorney
/Date
�
COUNTY �F RAMSEY:
By .
Chairman, Board of County
Commis�sioners /Date
By
Chief CTerk Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
.
By -� • :
Assistant County Attorney
/Date
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
By
Its Director /Date
� ;, , . .�;�.,�.: �,r- . .-� -� .. ...._.;: ��...,�-�. � !f
. f�:� t ., �:�` i; _,. ,.::�.�,;�. -"�� ` , , / ,.
. . ' 1: . :,'t.. . �.,r,.`.• �. • . f /
. . . 4. • � f . . l' `` 1 ` . �� • ' . , �.. f � '� � ��/ .
.. , 1 . • ' �.`'; \4�� , A ! ♦ • �' � ... `,�`' J',/ . . r�( �. , D
� . �- ' � ..;•, ,� '� 'Y . '` _. . "� ` . _ ' : . . , . _ f.!_
, r1`� � �� ` -�-_,..�-�. i ,+ _ � o ` Y .
� �/ n 1 / �
• _ 't• ! . { _ ~ � ' • • K,t. • ♦
; ,'� `+` . � � , ~ �/ `� 1' ' f.. t �....-.-,,:.�7.. ` i ' .t :� 1 . . . •� ' �� • • ^ � , ....... „. �.�'
+ • J'I � �`+ � � I . • c.�.. L���'..��_� �� I• ' � .�, ` `� is` . •� ' j /
• • - �r�� �....y....��-^�'� ��, ��j''•�'-�-�j+,,�i� � ` ��
.. . _ . _ Y`'f 3�Y'^'� _ � , . � ' `'y 1 .� � � a. • . • • � , � �• � �
•�• • � • i � C ��� � .a.� �_ � " •� y� � 7
� ,�,9.... - ..�':n� .. w . 7 • � ;�.. �.. � ' '��3'.�� .y ,, //
�4 � , ., , ^ n S. M `'��.' . t�� .,.r 4,� ,r _ �-1.�. .�. �... . . � .. ` ^� ' �rl �f 1 . ( '• 1
� � • " ' ••� s .ra� I ' . l S. �I . 1 ' ; � , . ' " _ - , i il
,'�* � �_ --�'.� � _ - • , ' �:`_ �`�._ -°�.+'—;�-_•-�-- - r - L - -_ „� ` .
- .. � � �„/ .�-_-_. :r. ' ' : � . � � ,;��.." "` • �`.�` I
• . � e � Y u+t �
� ,' . . .± �' '� ` ^ �-;. �..,.r : ,r� ;,. :r t; j „ .�
� .� � , � •. ..... � . . .,. t
:� '..r;. ,ry.- - , . -. _,.�'� } 1„ .r .
' -'r �'. � l .t 3 }� J t �'•l � .''7�� } ' ' .y'. , • . �, ',i
.. . . � � �. � . ;� �' �. �„ � �,/ ..
� .� ' . .. . . ......... .... :. .. _._ .. .... •- ... . ... . r%tti �Cti '� . . .r - / -� � � (
� .. . ._ ...... : ' ,;�. . �_.. �- ' _.. % '' .. �%s \���i�.' ' r f
:.-� ,""�' • - i � . ... . ' ..,y ...%:....._..... �..-.. _ _ , �' ., 7
� . - ... ��....- .�...• . . •� ......_.. ., . �� '�' ,.� . � �/" •
.'� •� j"'-' E. 's: •<r.r• �.%�M��``•, �. f•. 't":�' .
/ irr• , • �• . . .. ... :�:a:a-:: ....,. ..... � i , � 1 ni.':..' � *ti, �'~ � } _ '
�µ ._.. ' .. ... ' ' ' - .d4_ �5�1.,�1,, "V.;;±��"�'` � - r
� /'�' • . . _.» . ._ - � . ... 'ti,...�.c-,= "r^�� . . ` ,�:�� f; - _ r :� '� .r .-•= " .
•-• Y ..�-� '�,q„_ _ ._ ..... " �.,��� . • :�.�<'.. �. y .•.;~. .
� � ' - t, : ' • : • " :� rt• • f '-`• ' ' •
— � �� _ � y�r,,;:%--�,.' r':' .�__..:.r'� `�,�•, •'; +;. ; � . •, .Y; ' �4 ` ^
`�. � � �..3. ��� '~ �� � �3
•- — � ' � fi �J . . �_"'"�'.a::%�'� �;� . .y�„ �!""'•J1,�• � .. �.... '�,.
i':..' � � '�`" ,,,�--•�_ � ��',.r. : ..... .�.. .�t`� =��' ! '`,�'`••-� `��," ' '�-!�r
_: /� ' '� ^^^--..`' ' __..��F,�'�'�'"'-.. _ �+ �.�..�-.-rie• ���,;�_ �1.��' •� �� `� f�.►...
� / _ �'. �i �� � .�t . J��•`..-� i � ..+ • `` � �'
• � . . ...»1 __ • • � r�' -•�,,,,,� ..•:•_ '� 1,..�.+ 4� � ,, -`. `"' _ i ' ' "' �
/t' • � .• r.�.
.�. •J-� • �„L'_„� � \ --' �•' � � �
. ' l+ .. . . . �. � � ��l��✓, /: !7'; '� � �`. , , � . • . `: � �� V ..�-�+�r."� .... - �
.ti�, `+ 5:;� ��•�.` !':
+ .�-.�—��-rC 't�. \ � •
�` �� � '+`{ _' �. .. �' . _ ;s \ ; •,� ,+�� �y �.,r, ..� . ,.. .., � . • . _ - .
`� �? g . ♦ , . ' •�.: � . � ..
\\� t .'t•' :i.�'� , �♦`I'r1' �t; ' :^'��, _`.'� . r, e .. f,'. ' '
� � l � 1',� ti ��� `�— Ni � il� .,`� �� � �iw� . �O) .i�wi
�� � �'�r�7' y �. � �`�'.:, ..t� + ` , "'\\- . _ �' �s•_.—Y,.- -:�._ ..._
�"'\... �..'_^-�,,, � ' � �'• �... � � , : t � � �
/ � ~' _, r: • � �
. %1 _
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
February 22, 1983
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was cal]
by Chairperson Kruse at 8:00 o'clock P.M. The following members were F
Kruse, Morson, Frank, Blesener, Stefani and Butler. Burke was excused.
present were City Planner Howard Dahlgren and Public Works Director Jin
ed to order
resent:
Also
Danielson.
Chairperson Kruse noted�the reappointment of Burke and Stefani, along �iith himself,
and welcomed them for another three year term on the Co�ission. �
ELECTION OF Chairperson Kruse opened the floor for nominations for Chair-
OFFICERS person and Vice-Chairperson. Stefani moved, s conded by
Frank, that Kruse be nominated for Chairperson. Frank moved
seconded by Butler, that Blesener be nominated for Vice-
Chairperson. Nominations were closed.
APPROVAL OF
MINUTES
Cameran Kruse was elected Chairperson and Jan t Blesener
was elected Vice-Chairperson for 1983•. Voting all ayes.
Minutes of the January 25th meeting had been
previously. Butler moved, seconded by Blese
minutes be approved as submitted. Voting:
HEARING, CASE ��83-02, Chairperson Kruse called the meeting to order
CULLIGAN, SUBDIVISION of a public hearing on an application by Lawre
AND CRITICAL AREA for the subdivision and critical area site pla
SITE PLAN APPROVAZ his property located at the northwest corner o
Road and TH 110. Mr. Culligan was present and
he had just submitted a new set of drawings, w
access to Lot 3. He noted that drainage will '
via a drain pipe and a ponding area. He also �
lot sizes are in excess of the minimum 15,000
one lot containing 48,000 square feet.
mitted
that the
ayes.
or the purpose
ce Culligan
approval of
Glenhill
noted that
th modified
e accomplished
oted that all
quare foot, with
Butler was concered about drainage into Mendot . Mr. Culligan
replied that the runoff rate will not be incre sed but that
the volume of water will increase, although no signif icantly,
according to the hydrologist from Suburban Eng neering. Mr.
Culligan noted that there are no other areas t be developed
around his property.
Chairperson Kruse asked for questions or comme�ts from the
audience.
Mr. John Davidson, engineer from Toltz, King, uval and Anderson,
representing the City of Mendota, spoke, notin the concerns
of Mendota's residents over the increase of wa er problems.
He noted that Mendota would not be opposed to he development,
provided three items of concern are addressed:
1. A deferment of the development until the w ter discharge
matter can be taken care of and Mendota's anitary and
storm water project is completed.
�
Planning Commission Minutes, February 22, 1983 Page Two
2.
3.
That the volume of water be controlled before development
commences. He suggested that the water be contained, no
just detained.
That strict erosion control measures be followed.
Mr. Davidson noted that Mendota's sewer project will probably
take another 30 days for completion, then bids can be taken
in mid to the end of May, with the general work completed in
the fall of 1983 and some cleanup anticipated in the spring of
1984.
Mr. Culligan noted that he was anticipating street and utility
construction this summer if his project is approved.
Mr. Bob Bruestle, Mendota Councilmember, spoke, expressing
his concern over additional water problems being created if
this project is allowed.
Mayor Royal Bakke also spoke of the City`s concerns over excess
water runoff problems.
An unidentified woman from Mendota spoke, noting that last
spring she had dump trucks haul dirt out her back yard after
the snow melted. She noted that problems have been increasing
in the last several years, due to the development of Valley
View Oak.
Many other residents complained about excess sand, dirt, ruts,
etc, in their yards, making them unusable for gardens or
open space.
Mr. Earl VanBerkem, from Mn/DOT District 9, spoke noting that
Mendota does not need any more water. He also e�ressed concern
with excess tfiater from Mendota Heights and TH 110 coming from as
far away as Lexington Ave. That water will be removed when the
Mendota Interchange Project is completed.
There being no further comments or questions, Butler moved to
continue the public hearing until March 22, directing staff
to try to find answers to the concerns expressed at the hearing
and to come back with some answers and to work with John
Davidson on the water runoff problem. Stefani seconded the
motion. Voting: all ayes. •
Mr. Culligan was requested to petition for an engineering study
in the meantime, so that engineering could be closely looked at.
A Councilwoman from Mendota also noted concern that the City's
wells might become contaminated from all the runoff and dirt.
CASE ��83-03, DALGLISH, Chairperson Kruse called the meeting to order for the purpose
SUBDIVISION of a public hearing on an application from Mr. Herb Dalglish,
1054 Sibley Memorial Highway, for subdivision of his property
Mr. Dalglish was present to explain his request, noting that
• proposed to build a new home for his family on the lot south
of his existing home.
- � Planning Commission Minutes, February 22, 1983 Page Thr�e
A Lilydale Councilwoman was present for the he ring and
asked about drainage in Lilydale. She also as ed about
erosion control measures.
There being no further comments from the audi
moved, seconded by Frank, to close the hearin
and to recommend approval of the subdivision,
variance to the new lot size of 13,300 square
conditioned upon adherence to strict erosion
Votin�: all ayes.
CASE ��83-06, STRUB, Chairperson Kruse called the meeting to order
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT of a public hearing on an application from Wil
FOR PUD for a conditional use permit for a planned uni
TH 13, between Wachtler and I-35E. Mr. Strub
and Mr. Bob Ackermann was present to discuss t
He noted that the building materials would con
sandy colored brick exterior, and he hoped the
to have a copper roof or otherwise,�hand split
The walls would be reflective, tinted (pink) m
�ce, Morson
at 8:54 P.M.
anting a
et, and
trol measures.
or the purpose
iam Strub
development on
as out of town
e request.
ist of a rustic,
would be able
cedar shakes.
rror glass.
The commission noted that no phasing plan had een submitted and
that several variances were also needed, relat ng to the size
of the parking stalls, and the easterly and fr nt yard setbacks.
It was also pointed out that removal or reloca ion of two or
three parking stalls was indicated since they ere on 40% slopes.
There was a considerable amount of discussion ver the net
28,000 square feet of floor space and the numb r of parking
spaces required by Ordinance.
No one was present in the audience for the he
As noted by Planner Dahlgren, many aspects of he preliminary
development plan were not included in the pac ge. These
items were the matters of covenants, additiona p�r_king 'spaces
for approximately 29,000 square feet of usabl floor space,
parking in the critical area slopes, staging p an showing
utilities, surfacing, signage,lighting, and a ore complete
market plan along with a more detailed landsca�ing plan. The
commission also wanted to see, in writing, the list of building
materials for the structures. The members did not forsee any
problems with granting any of the requested va iances to parking
spaces and setbacks.
There being no further discussion, Butler move , seconded b
Stefani, to continue the public hearing to Mar h 22nd for
discussion of the items to be included in the ext 30 days.
Voting: all ayes.
It was pointed out that the developer will nee� to petition
for public improvements for the project.
HEARING, CASE ��83-05, Chairperson Kruse called the meeting to order or the purpose of
HENRICH, SUBDIVISION a public hearing on an application from Peter enrich, 1875
South Lexington, for a subdivision of his lot. Mr. and Mrs.
Henrich were present to explain their request, however
no one was present for the public hearing and he commission
members had no questions of the applicants.
�
YlanninK t,onunission Minu[es, iebruary LL, lytf.S Yage r'our � �
As noted in staff reports, the Henrichs own a large lot that
has enough area but not enough frontage to be legally split
without a variance. A 10 foot variance to the north lot wou_
be required.
No one was present for the public hearing and a-fter a brief
discussion Morson moved, seconded by Butler, to close the
public hearing at 9:55 P.M. recommending approval of the
subdivision, and granting a 10 foot variance to the north
lot, as well as requiring a 50 foot right-of-way dedication
from the centerline of Lexington Avenue. Voting: all ayes.
CASE 4�83-07, KEGLER, Mr. and Mrs. Leo Kegler, owners of Lot 4, Bl 1, Sunview Hills, or
VARIANCE 1880 Hunter Lane, were present to request approval of a 30
foot frontyard setback variance to construct a home 30 feet
from the front property line. Other homes in this area are
setback much greater than the required 30 feet but this
particular lot has a drainage easement and a wetlands located
on the rear of the lot.
After a brief discussion, Stefani moved, seconded by Morson,
to recommend approval of a 170foot front yard setback.variance.
Voting: all ayes. '
CASE ��83-08, VAN, Mr. Scott Van, 1885 Hunter Lane, was present to explain his
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT request to place f ill on Lot 3, Bl 4, Sunview Hills.
FOR FILL After a brief discussion over the matter of a corrected topo
being needed, especially in the driveway area, Blesener movec
seconded by Frank, to set a public hearing for March 22nd, to
consider a conditional use permit for fill on Lot 3, Bl 4,
Sunview Hills. Voting: all ayes.
RECESS Chairperson Kruse called for a recess at 10:15 P.M. The
meeting reconvened at 10:20 P.M.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL At the January 25th Planning Commission meeting, Richard
ZONING DISTRICT Parranto was present to request an amendment to the zoning
ordinance by requesting creation of a new zoning district
to allow his proposed-project to-be�constructed at TH 110
and Lexington. In response to commission direction, Planner
Dahlgren had prepared a proposed new R-3A Zoning District
addressing this concern. The new district would contain a
mini.mum of 80,000 square feet and would be intended for
projects with 32 or more units and more than three stories in
height. •
The Commission members discussed several aspects of the new
zoning district with member Stefani noting that he would not
like to see higher density in Mendota Heights, particularly
at TH 110 and Lexington. Member Butler wanted Council opinion
on the new district and also wanted public input on the matter.
Chairperson Kruse noted that he is not in favor of establishing
a new zoning district for R-3A. The other commission members
suggested that perhaps Mr. Kruse could contact other members
of the City Council to get their opinion of the zoning district.
Blesener noted that she felt comfortable with the district and
would like to see it pursued further.
r ,,
Planning Commission Minutes, February 22, 1983
VERBAL REVIEW
ADJOURN
Page Five
After further discussion, Frank moved, seconde
by Stefani,
ota Heights
at this time. Voting: 4 ayes, 2 nays, Blese er and Morson.
A verbal review of the application by Bill Str b for a variance
that was granted at the February lst Council m eting was given.
There being no further business to come before the Commission,
Butler moved, seconded by Morson, that the mee in be ad'ourned.
Voting: all ayes.
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:05 o'clock P.M.
Public Works Director Danielson noted that the e may be
an additional public hearing on March 22, rega ding a
simple subdivision on Callahan Place which may have some
neighborhood opposition to it.
�
C1'rY OF TiENDOTA HLIGf{T5
llAKOTA CQLFNTY, MINNESOTA
APPI,ICATION FOR CONSIDFRATION
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
Applicant 1
Name : (��c1 � i S f? �L° Y' ,�'� ��r
Last�— First
l�ddress: (7'c� �� 10 �'�
Number & Street Ci y
Telephone Number: Z- ��- � c� g�J
Owner
� Name : r� � 1.5 � � -�? .�
• Las��- First
Address: � 7..at� � �`�"`, i � t�� ��
Number & Street Ci.ty
SCreet Location of Property in Questian:
/C , ,! �, . , /�"i3`7 . '?�/ � , r 1 ;
Legal Descriptzon o� Property:
_ e _. / s r— r . � n--
-�_r� %_�'J a�3 0 0- ca � o �
cas; Na
� -{-O
Date of Ap licatic
' Fee Paid'���y� -�--
i t� i� In�al
�"� �tx w � � i
S ta re
�l °� 1 �i
Initial
_ <�t_._�4'� !
S �a te
,
Type af RequesC: tcezoning
Variance
� ' Conditional Us� Perrnit
Conditiona2 iJse Permit for P.U.D.
hlinor Conditional Use P�rmit
• �_ ,��"` Subdivisian Anproval
Plan Approval
lJetlands i'ermiC
�___ Oth�r
/; a–�3
s4� 1 ) g �
Zip
tl � y
Z ip
� �' / t g''�.
Applicable City Ordinance Number �� �
Section .�
�- Present Zoning of Property: /� /
. . �-----
���,Present Use of Property: � f ' �
. �� �•' � / .
� •;: "'' �r'oposed Zoning •of Property:
� '+ ° Proposed Use of Property: :, ' � � ;� l 2` � , � � ��
r�
Number of people intended to live or work on premises: �%
� �
� ,� : - . • ,� . .
_ -• ; ; , - ,
�I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional
material are true.
., ,r�•,.} .
... � . 1 Y
.,, {� _
';- <.
� . • '
, �
�
ignature of Applicant
� f
Dat
v � /
Received by (title)
�
NOTE: The f.ollowing plans shall be drawn and attached to this application:
�: A: '`Applications involving a Variance shall si�bmit the following plans:
,,,� ,� ;��.�ti , � �, . . • ' � - � . � - Date Received , Ini tial ...
. l. Site Development Plan _
' 2. Dimension Plan �
,,, _ 3. La�dscape Plan • � " '
� • - 4: ' Grading Plan
�
B. Applications involving a Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit or Subdivi.sion
shall submit the following:
1. Sketch Plan
2. Abstractors Certificate
(If the subdivision involves cuttin� of existing parcel into two or more lots).
25 January 1983
PLANNING REPORT
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
RLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
83-03
Herb and Patricia Dalglish
Southwest Corner of Trunk High
Mayfield Heights Road (see ske
Approval of Lot Division
�y 13 and
l. Herb and Patricia Dalglish reside at the property in question (10 4 Sibley
Memorial Highway) in a two story home located approximately in th center
of the property with access off of Mayfield Heights Road. Tliey p opose to
build a new house for themselves on a lot to the south of the exi ting
home on a flat area of land above the hill separating the propose homesite
from the existing residence, �
2, They have submitted a plan for the lot division (attached) propos:
lot line to run generally at the toe of the slope separating the
homesites. This lot line will be 30 feet from the existing home,
fulfilling the 30 foot rear yard requirement for the R-1 Single F
Zone. The land is zoned R-l. The lot line, you will notice, jog
to include the flat area behind the existing home (south side) wi
larger remaining lot to the north. We suggest�that this is appro
inasmuch as that flat space behind the existing home is far more
useable and maintainable as a part of the existing homesite and 1
The placing of the proposed lot line in this way produces a build
frontage for the new lot of 95 feet as measured at the building 1
(30 feet back from the right-of-way), The minimum requirement fo
frontage in the R-1 District is, of course, 100 feet. The actual
frontage at the property line (street right-of-way) is 104 feet.
appear that under these circumstances, this is not a crucial devi
from the Ordinance requirements inasmuch as there will be approxi
70 feet between the new house and• the old house. The lot depth (
new lot is 104 feet. The lot area is 7.�,300 square feet, whereas
square feet is required.
When considering this smaller lot size, it may be appropriate to }
mind that the overall density of the two lots together is 19,175 :
each. The lots sizes and lot area have been calculated after the
of an additional ten feet on the west side of Mayfield Heights. i
right-of-way of Mayfield Heights Road is 40 feet, thus the total �
will equal 50 feet. Mayfield Heights Road has been constructed ai
Public Works Director suggests that the additional ten feet of ric
will be adequate in this case.
a new
thereby
mily
so as
h the
riate
eadily
lot
ot
t would
ion
tely
r the
5,000
:ep in
;uare feet
ledication
;isting
Lght-of-way
i the
it-of-way
�
CASE NUMBER: 83-03
APPLICANT: Herb and Patricia Dalglish
DATE: 25 January 1983
Page 2
3. This area is in the Critical Area (River Corridor) and an applica ion
have to be processed after the lot has been created for the const ucti
of the new home. At this time, the applicant has indicated the a prox
location and size of the home he proposes to build. This locatio is
indicated by the dotted lines near the south side of the proposed lot.
will
te
4. Inasmuch as this is a metes and bounds property, the division of his lot
should be processed as a preliminary plat rather than a lot divis'on. Such
a lot division,as you know, may be approved if the lot to be divi ed is an
existing platted lot. Under these circumstances, the Planning Co ission
may wish to consider the setting of a public hearing for consider tion of
the Preliminary Plat. ,
r
, , ` •�G- � / ,l�r /�'�! .$ y r� '. � �� "�'U � � '
�/ - t,' . �� �, `
. ' � - � r , :� -��� t � � �
' � - � ii� .�a . �, �
� � _ / �'J . .
, ^ , O'` •• . U • _
` �^� ha�
. � - �:�.-�'_`� '� �,� � ��i • ,
.�_- � .
, ` : �';: �,,' �[..d..._� M .. _ R
_ _"� r � � ,;;� ' . nn� m unn � .
� + ' �' :i';'= � • � uni n� m•n '� : ac;
l �• ' !
•: ,..> ,! 1 , .
s � F��(:; 4••:.a : • �` ni ._^-Y (ii{� '
'r, � ��`^ � �
(� GiLiO - "�,! r ' • k. �' - . -
� fr � ,
r, � _ ..;. �
�_ ... r��� � � � �
o :µ .r:� � � :�r
r������ � , �.,'•`�'_ `�' ,:� � �� ` � \ t �
�= : •4',�'. '�;, :
f `���'� • �. ��A t' � /
NORTH �� �UbjG�t�- `'�� � :-�f �t ` -:
/' I�-� • r ;'} �� � a�� �• � 1�'�1 i �
� f � Pro�er��� =-� �� � � _� ! � � . , 4.
. -/' ` •:%::�" .. `� -C •� ,. - L � �r
' `�++ r.:;.;'� � � �• /�
-' � ` ' �r.'.�,` . - � r�ey, t + �` � '� , '.�
� �y � : ' .l . r' -' -• �'� ( `'� M � ` �
. �- -- _ -. �,�" •�.:.: •`a,i* ` , j --- :'`�.. . . ! � \ 1 ,f .< �
.
_' / �,� .� •� __.,_ �,,� • .
_ �t'�►�� . I Iy (! . ; ; . ` • � � e f �" � �+"n
«�ir �
`�''';� M� 11�ll�' � ' � ' ' ` � € ' ._ ``i,�
w,,.���o � �,..-- . "'ti . " ' � � •
i` ' • •t • • ' � • " ��
.� .:�r' ' ,� ' ': d • r . � 1\' �
.t . _� , ' � 43n ' . ` . `�J
. i:;:. �� . . / ( : °y �`�y
�+t . `� , . . .'',�" � . � � >> ` � ��.'+�
��•` .:t ;•.. `• •�"% • / • � �� A { 1 P .� � 'A
�* ` • • • • ' 4 / , 1.� �`r �
� . � , r1`� •� •• i � � • � • �• Y-.. • ��« • ♦ r Yi s = � 1
�/ � • �• e • •
/ � ��. ' � + •I �1 • • • � �•/ • • � �� �' i � Y .
jJ '=t'w�' � �v •� � • • • �! • Q f� �F �� , �
/ � ..,`r� ••i• - ' � \ • l�y,,,• • � // t � \�„��.�
. � • , , , Y , , ,, 1 � - •i : , ► � ,, � �.. �
. , .. . . ` � {
,,,�,�+`+(�'� .: k i . , ( � • i f � MAN{E � / � �`. � ``� � �,�'
�+i 1 1 .•... .�•'• •''.�. .;.,. . .,.. « . �' � � f (� �./ ��
AYENUE -�'�
� � � � . • • • • . � i • a = � • PARK � � �, j 1 � i .� � � :
� . •' ' / i` �t. €�
_i�' � � •' ` � � -
� ^ � ' • + � ' , �_ .
� � ��fAAR1E• AVENU + ^��.yv�r �r V t �� t• s
1 j • w i n�iC�O� ' 1 j ;
i i� � �; � t �1 � � „ 1 � � '� • i�w _ � ,C.
i � �L
i � �� % • �• .j.
• � J J 'a
' tt 11l. "�^ � • � � �
�b'� lh �t\ • • � � • ` e
Ii ' � ` "' ' "� .
. � � � � I • � . '
Y � �s� f . ..��. • o � . :
� N � Ct � � �' { '
\` j / �"_+ W • • f,— .
• w / � � � • �
�� • v d .' .,� '� f • � fl, � i . �
,, � .
, - • � s� , i :
� � �_ � / s�v , •
Y�yp(Stt C[CM{NTARY � �� �
- S�HOOI :.�S�K, p , �� �� : �/' , � _ ' �.
�' /
/ CU /� •rE :�wt "+'
, z / i I
� � .� i
.� � a� a ••
ti • `' •� ESiCIMCIE � � • � • � �� \ S , 1 � ,� !
�
r :i 1f" 1 � /"� ' \
� - \ � � ' � ` ;, � '+ ,
� `�, , , ' � '/l� • � �i .` \ �''- -
} ' ' ' ' � ,' 2
� ^" � i
-'�"�"" t�J� ��v�� f � CASE NUMBERt $3-03 �
� C=_NTR ,' APPLICANT: Herb and Patricia algl.ish t
, - , � _
� S�TE �, / � � � • • ; ACTION: AAProval of Lot Di ision '''� �
. � � - • �._c
J -'� ��., y �. � . ~� %= � .,_..�-y =,_._ � �� -._t""'`.�— = =�h��--�� _--_ _-- _ - � _3�.__��..�__ � ;
._�.-.-- --'—_-- :��.. _ �.
-+,�,>,'�a��-�:?.,.� -� ��a�,-_...�.--.'�a � ,^*',�a�'-�"��T.`�-�a..l`�" /.:'���m�- a`�'�'��. • . .. ,. . ,,��..�� G�y,' ��^'�: �: �! "'�I`';' . .
�a.._ - . _.._.. • • �• �
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Commission
SUBJECT: Dalglish Plat
January 20, 198:
Mr. and Mrs. Herb Dalglish want a larger home to live in. Their p esent
home at Trunk Highway 13 and Mayfield Heights Road is located on a large
unplatted lot and they would like to split that lot;sell the home hey
now live in and build a new one "up the hill".
The existing lot has some slopes on it that are unusable as yard s ace
so staff has worked with the Dalglish's to locate a new lot line t at
maximizes :usable lot area for both homes. One of these new lots eeds
a variance to area and frontage. It is also acknowledged that the e
lots fall within the Mississippi Critical River Corridor and staff has
informed the Dalglish's that a Critical Area Ordinance review woul be
required at the time their home plans are submitted. (A home can e
built on this new lot without any variances to that ordinance)
Staff feels this proposed plat is feasible and recommends favorablE
Commission action.
A public hearing needs to be established for the next meeting.
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
22 February 1983
83-03
Herb and Patricia Daglish
Southwest Corner of Trunk Hi
Mayfield Heights Road
Approval of Lot Division
�
13 and
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: •
l. Attached is a copy of the report from last month which reviews th basic
proposal and its considerations.
2. It would appear that the placement of the house fronting on Mayfi ld
Heights Road placed 10 feet from the south prope�ty line (side lo line)
can readily be accomplished on the site. The driveway from the g rage
(placed 30 feet from the new right-of-way line) would have a slig t slope
to Mayfield Heights Road. The northerly portion of the house cou d have
a walk-out feature inasmuch as the house could easily be designed so as
to have a portion of it placed on the slope facing north. There 's an
ample amount of backyard which is almost flat on the west side of the
structure.
3. Though the lot line is proposed to have a jog in it, it would app r that
handling the lot line dividing the two lots in this way will reta n the
flat space 'south of the existing home for its use.
'�\ �_��� l .. �' .
' � 'f . . , l �,�.�`�� :Y`,:, �''. . ' � . . � . ' � ..
- • - • Case No. �
� � - � � City of M'endota Heights . . •
�'°'�� � ' � ��:.,� �-;.' =;w:. �.�D,akota. County� Minnesota =r "" � -�::`'.: ��"��;�
,.:x: `�::� :.,, „..;:.: . i" h �;. �a<:rw...:..r.
_ _ _ .> Kc '•� . ; ='?``.: � , , t �s �' . �^ �;
.. - , - ;' •+'`' . .r� . .;'. - - - �. •'� � i�z •�i ry �� a -1-
, � � • ' :{ <2 . ,'. �...•.
. '� y'X"�' ' ' � �.' ' .'�,�,j. `�
p. .}•�a .x�tuY � , .�'� C{'�:.i..�::' `'S ��' ,}�•:,'¢.a•+, , A ,�� '*r � f ���'�,'s
� .ti�.• y ��. �,.. ,.`� ��T I ON.-. .::. . . .. f�_ ,.:� • �,'�:,::�:. �. �:..�:, �,,
_. � ;,:_.'-,�`� PP,UIC FOR���ONS�1pERATYON•,.;r t ?;� ..�,�,.:,-.�.�f=� ,
��'-� ' ;,:r .'^�' . .' ��!:'�� ''.%.:•' :x.?:^4CaK�C� �'S" :d� � %f�� .y,. -�%'..���. �t- .�.« -
} ,�.�• .-Miv �;,t. r, �s�g:'�.,�, yv:'� ..a_ , - lk� �k:�_i
"S'.a i,�41* t . iY.l. :r'f+�"� `O fJ� r.�' 1 \' .{`� y"iI, a�F.`.tl..' _ �Jh.( ��
y :.i*'�g��k`+'..'f_'?• 't'*��'_ µ�3`'r?."`r �i�e t.,''� :„�' �=1:_ ��'' �' ` - `Y�'
rrv: t. a.-.�A �t''�'; -^'�: �Y� , ..,y;^ �:�.,, -'�;"�da� .�..
{,�� .i:� . '��' c. , s., t'"'� }� .Y .i.: - y, - ��.tn� .4 r :1'
�.�: `�,,. .. X -,� '`I�L"��� .;'Fi{• :ii /� �_h,� � .J. 1. �i�' � T * �en � .�T,C �b'�`�4 J...
....t;:. ',•;�.. ��.":..�:�r�..�r�<<.��::,-� _ .��.�, PIiANN�ING RE� LJESZ:�n.°����: ��-;:�;:,�.x +:��,r.� ::o �a.
� ;'~ic .;i.�;:t�T� �,,: .ye, , .�;:;�..rr" ��. ¢,"<4s.> t. ' :�;..�, X- :� 1,-';�•..,. '�:.: }r 3, . r, e ��'i�?:� .. � �y-"`-�•'�'t=.�,
"R`• '-'y�- y1 ;�;i+: ..i:.'"' S:i'�":'.rlfi=is r*��. '�-`.�..N :.r,���2" .4:;: ,�, s�..yi °� q .�� :Y��!;��e: -:y:_ }.. ��i ( c
�as, x. �r; .A:. N.� (�,�
�' ',x!}i�;S °± "�.`� �� ,.,�:. •: 1' - ..4. .#,;,: �L- a 5:...y,_'?� a?� '� •�s. �
,a.,t.�'t.� .'s�;: ,f-'' ;itY :.Sr.;a.a3'�,;:�.in.."h..Sn ',d.�}';:ii;..s��� .�,�, .':r f,+�'ti,: '".t. 5 r y ::�%'
y- '.si`� �":/:�c'.'.'°t :�� `.'�ref.- - y�^"c�'t'= "���L.#b r .9.. �` r � ?' ;'tt1'.`::�„ � :,i,a!a r dy ,�.7.� j.p .; �,� • :.!" a .a (J � S .(] ';� •�{{z. .
�d� I.. �� n�.�y.� ��.'� i� s. ,' � 1.;.C• �';'.n .L`iG • � Y� � 2 i4
�a; �� -R -���.v L� �,�. .� �J.��.�c'ation` _.' "% :'G''K �^'r'�',�N�.
'.�;"x t. i• f� . u 7�` (t7' %Y'. '�a�'l�•"iCi_ lf�
�'�'re�. 's:�:c.j.� '�A. ���`.�;i�'. ��%47 :.,'i+:• �.(.�� N'�"i4�k'•.�'� �t�, yN �',�,i� �. .'� i► i" � A .
:i�� :.5": �G�o ts:� �n• �;.�;'1� y {,t�r�7+. .J:,7F;� h:;:,_.� �''r ; 1:x'> �`�•,., �ra'. t'� hp.�`'�.i'',' F i,;.
�F ) -ral t � � ?% �iil'� .✓ t .�...:.�� 4i3" �.� yiA H..
•+Q• `1j' ti,k; ..r.` � ,C: ;,lo. '��"� ,A�. r^wva' �. ���.,iy.,._i;'v'.., r x,,,s,;""`.�..` '�t���..y „���' _y;,` �.it,,..J t;�A• �i .i::}. t;�'t'� <
„�f� ,.�.`R' :G'��t� �..Y.S*�SiT�Yr.y� iS.Y•A�:f_����y;,.C,� .T I ���k. r.. ,�y�+� ��!m'� t�-�x1:§:,54..�.F''d" =*Se•�. .�;( ,�ti I .,��' :�'2'k'�"t'.t3�`: 1.
ri't,: `'k> �,� :,'a �. i' .'"s �; t . '`t�"� v:�•. . a}�:,:ry . 3�dF �l 7L
�iN ,. Lt ..Y ,�' '�4.. �vY� V w F 'k��:. °[f'< �p.'..'. r .
� �'���,r,.. " f � r,_iw: �'. :'`y y �''�`' „d: � a` -�.+`�M,'{-�.a.`ae•'`n,F ''�',•�`',S."f<-.i ����4f, 1 �$?°'.��it �. ,�`'' :"`: i' i �i�� � ],� '�`� _ : t: �
�;,` � "'P a .cl :�.. �,::�., Yo �3t��
�i4`L• .r4.� a1�h� : _ �,� :Y �C,C b� ��_ .. ' ' � i� '
� � �' �/ .�. ;�__� j; ,�.. �;ee�;y . � �I
4�'�r �/a. •ti w.>>�i' f��:.�i41e�`t §,F'i(�y. r�tr,.:::^1a'iT 4ir'S.� _ .
:'1° .r.; �'.F, :�}?- ,Ci' - y�;u.c�_}; �,.�;� rs5:��;^� s w�'.s`.¢. .+3 r�•'ft. .'..'$`.d. �'��",: ��.� ��.;��-•Y':.r � - .:X,
..5,'s" :A ?S_ .F'j,j; piln, .. .4,'.Si: ...'�'r.S: ?G �+" .�',�:'q.:ib ; :'+a' .,y.'4..,�5'.t.'.�j 7 �41,a>.:"�y �`I'r��;,.�}�''�tii>�y :'%�.it � - '-<.y� ,�a
- :"4±i:.d:-a ..Y: Z` ^y �-� 't� ,",J� _- 1�; ro 5 �; p4t. %i^ .v> �-�.ii'a. .'-'�,:J ':,s'-' �'
' �a� � ,y ,�. .�- e'y1'.:."S a.a i',3',{',�-. ..1,�-.,;c.. ,. �..'1`�'•• ".,''ti,t •a.r. 3:k .�,�.
';�''Xs;e q�a.�&.-�,a.,t T .�.; - .:..��,,3,�.1 � .�7„�,.'<<r,.:�•:.s�;=.�i;�•?., �+ , f':.'<'„°i1•-,rga::i.t,?�! .._h�;, �:'�'�i"e,,:..1��� . �x. R,�s��•:��;:* ;.s^'�+�.�a .��'
.r a�t, +�;tA�P�y;. 1=i;canty ��f .,,�`� �'..�_.1�',,.r � t ' _ 1'P`. �'r�r- '.k -� Eu b
�'s:G'�..t•,':C,t": �Y.�:'^ -^+�L Y'. t� �.i:: • x ���:,lo ;�.�.4i;:.Y�i_�/ 1 �,J.,. �;�v ;''f'-ti�{-�,.;t ..�,}•y;, ��?.t.�.rd-i ".i^�W,�"%�'�`� �'u:�'Li;;•t"` :t
,i� �. t,: V' - ~• „�::e.,i YC"�'t�'.,;�° Y�' S.iy _'-Ne.. .' �.:'4 t.2.. :�� +,{'
�r :�. 4,�.-� �a *.r ✓• Y: � _ ' ,.� „ ��` .y ,.y. A, ?i;��;r, �+;¢�'�.�1;
,��;:�'-..�.;_{ �:r=�:_�• �;�-:l�ame �. �"J�C:` :��/ .�;��_�.. � ��2�,�� -�;��.?��::� :��2' ���-;��:=;:��:-_ :_�:,� :. y�(�,�
' �^t�F.•'7.1�. ��..+ 1,�.�"�aSa-. A. ;�.�. - _ �.'i�.} -"y3�i(1
!¢',i; � r� � � =>`F5 r'� � ':. � h�'4 . ii =Nq.' `ii ts... :� . - . �. , - _ .ir;t',`:.'�_t T�'•,a �`.n.:.;,,cu,; ,�.t��y� ':7, i. •. � .r.,.w; .
y '• s`�u- .�jt t'�'_��a .i-'tr-•'?"�,••' � ;� s ' '�': �i�`:i�:^.�..
'��.,a���` -�-':�=t� ..�< °,� :� ,�4 L'�' t'� �":e.-,>,:�,:_ . Fi:rst- �,�: ��k,T� �it a7: ��:z. -
. .li'.::°: •.i' :,r,', sL+i' �,r. i::. . �qx tJSx� .i�i�.�ti y•, t� f.`- ^�.y� s:. Y°^:� � ui . � ;;i 4. :�'•
f+ <4,* y �' _ 4. s `. i '�. :`'.;�x . 'F r �. p ° i. ..
~�.i � �1.. �n' �Y (�4.Ls � .6h �1i�h Y •..e,. ` y''- Tj': `��'1ia��-'� �..'..':,f�^•, J•�i�,�
,+ \• '�� , �G °"' t; �'�`Y �: J, r f y 'tn . i•.Y� �� _ �� `�tl: i;�,.a�:{..a . _ �' y',Y' • 'f' ���
_ iF '_ ....: ::; �4�:�� `"��� �::Y:�-�'� / ti'.
.^f:, ya.;;f.-. ';.1L'�' . '}R .t.: �4 �;,. ��.,,l.i �.c.'i.J,t: k . j{ "' ��: .�
�_��; .�.�".;•.,rr: ;Q. �.. �� "r Je�,S.:�'a.. ',4:-,�.. KTi,' '•T:^`e•g3=.,F.%.y'�'� t
s;8�r;t.'Y ` .i` - � �" �'.� - :j„ -;t.� ;r. .St:�" ,i, , �.~. 9' :.,'r'-• ;,,,:4:,i . , y« .;�� �:y:a , ' -
� . .*•z • - ' "�. i?`� �; :�,r4 r,�?rJ+ + - . ,t ` l.
. ;r<.�f:�����-7:�: . s`,:Aaaress �;t �s; .��7SS;=-�G � ����aw�,;�. ;;:�u��:;�:;:5:�'��dw �. $�'�'�/�.� .,:.
„O:i'•��in;%'1• .:l'�� �^yk:,. � 1`�.. .0 �.f " .. _. .6�. ' - � _ ' ."`
;��'� ���- n Numbert and�� Street , ��°' =Ci�ty., '� - '� x.Sta�,el �:Zi '=°C.ode � `�
- ':f: :" .. j:v./•.�;.a: ,i'.:s�,' 7u. •'r" d, .-t �.;Y`i:.:L.`4r`y° <%:-' •v"�'j;^ n , �.-
' ♦=i..q��'.l^ , v�a. •'iiilr '_t..�'Y . - , �.:{`5�.d.., ` - r,;r.%. - L'•°' ., _ - 1_�t
` ; � y : .:d . - ' - x }'' :1 � . r.`x'. , • ' :. :
� e.['il�%.�. .,t: �,� . ) : i'� ' - - .iJ''-].a , : C.i��
't•. ,�.x,•� ,.r� t,ar..r.!., "i ' - ''A 'i ,�'':�,4' .y..
� S�. ,��. �,i•i ti� .l `.k. �1's�'�,� •:Hri . ._
sby :';el. :C+`��c...q;�.I it �r..." :v j r: Yh�:.,iR.:�:.:' h'' / [e:`s�i� zss'.�.�.'.-�+tE:'f{4�l: `y: �t�� �R�
, f,Y, ��: ..;,�;°:��Own,er�;,�.y,:a:;��� ���..:�,::t, ,, y_.�:.,_,�. ��y,:� �:, �:�:: :,��.�;tF'-
/) �/, .Telephone IJO.sSI�Z �/.�Z: ';,-...
-..3d.�.'•�'J2'ifi�Yr";..;�•,_ ..3 �.:i: {J�'��;`�tA,. i4�i`SS 'r- // , }.� .� •o, 7LQ 1� ,//�//�� - �.xc��;�-, r ff+'
. •�-- '•,�.�.{. �..-Naine �°' �/�iC�A/.L'�' f�T`.. e�L�.j.�,.�'�,7' +1+' (__. �'"/'Y/IT•`/ 5�.��f34:�t.tr�j` rY: .. . + :�'
iy��.. rr��-rt�. . ' T _ =T C.i i `%v �` -c� ' . #
� ,�_ , . -- .. ?�,.�' �- J�>=.:'.;::'%?'t, :3�
� �. , r:. " i+i3i'4��, . 2r=�: • ¢i t�.'P, j i` i� .t �y�.. ` ',k.;ii ;Yls•s. i:�� '*:t w`i -
;�r'•���� ��ast, - -. ,:.. :E• F- c;" �- .:;.:. - •- Init a'�:�„-�=.�°,x,,,
. _,��, ., .•.: 5 : ; i�rst=r.:,-, �.� :
�� . � :i��...P.�l�� ';.t:i�4:.�'ff.�blGr� 7t'. ` " `f'� -r2�..1>�� � �1 ' ' �55� ��� �i ,c�. y.�S�J� *j.;�� :f.
� � " 'f, ..J1.j�i' �r'� �7�` • _ .. '�t'Y� - •Y'" '�tf,' A' iu Yu? � �'.
• y't`>9 Y. .�: i. �,.�_ •:�p'1F; �i'�.+�� .+: , Y- - a 1 '� �.f�' ..4? r.Y itiS.�i'J��q !Yd l.�CS.�.y:. ti �I:4 •.i'i_ a.V
' ' .y •- a*Y2'slNt'� 4' _ `W, :�1�.�' c ir _ �;+T a t`r`,e.t':.`y,w�Y :�L...y���
� '� 4..%.�.y.. r•r�. '`S • _ w.�`' G' iltki4,_ !"S�.�. J'
1 ! "ii i`F' Qai .,ly}�),y�ilYa• �}• • .�Li
.- , :;r.��;,_;�_. . Addre�ss,,,,; I�'`, s' .L'':j� '��. ".::: �:�5.= `�¢ ��:�= ��ly� :3 ••..
;. � �,��:. �;•..>,. (1 s;•:: ��?�,,��
. � . , � ,j.`; .,�k . ., i + _ , . , ' . . . _ frr''��`��..
.�: "4
. ��; .. �;. - -�Y'`�•. um.ber.•�:'a.rid'�St ee-t� - `��,c��:• ' Cit '�%:.�:,��_ t�s:t. ."'`,...,,�*t.:'�Z�; ��code`. �,�,`>
� •� i.:�,,�.N � . �:j;� y a��e,�,..�,.,, �
<,�-� �,,:,;� A ,:�;:t r . r =°` �,.•.:=. . -,� p� f.
`., �r , ,•�,' ..rf.�, .�.„ ., , X�'; - ��.-.A� ::y"5" ar`o''� �' ^`'Tr"�`' � d: "" :S..�i '' x,`F1;i�i
• s-:.<.
' i- .-j�1y, ' s{;'y;,..`� ``L ^'F��- ,�Y`4:z�i
' . i;'; :::'i,w � :M1 �2"� ,a� Cc �'%-: "�• _ � �`...1'>� �''=i.;fy�>� �=�q`.�':-,.w�:.:v�+Y i _
, - j.SE�.- 'cv� _ :_�.� �it;, r��' , . �,,v��j;...�� _ y.,' . . 1�.':. � _ ��q.�;'aj:ic" :: � �v d�� 't'�..
�t i n � u e s t i o • , _ ,. � `;.. _ "- ._; : ��-� . :�;:.
' _- ;,xstreet Loca�i.on`�of �'Proper•,�..y:: {,rQ n.��: _ ;, '`�':;�-,.�;;-�,;;•;:` =s:,�`�' ..� • L�=r. • �.,
. rt.�' •'I,� �', -� . : j , i ti` i,q -�. - . .ti �,.9;;ga�si - r• 'xC, _ •,y,:. 'i ',"a' , , �:, q.�+s .�t, , ,. ':iz.�. F
,:t,:; x.. -/ .�1r,� -�?��s�� �,�+' $: a:r.'.,_ }f i /k. + .i' . �„ �;"�,��;�;� +�_ ,
���� �"z','. � . 5:t / y-�! . �i" �'�'Fl _ � y yi4• 1 " �^`:x���' r ��'��/ ��' F•;u,. i � "#� �'+� . ._ - { 'iu�:: - � �.i ' �'.,
' cT` - .`'")%4� A_ .-�:,i.�,. }L �. % '`.?C' y •,Y4 '3':.:t
/ ��. . ti:� � :, �; � .11:i
<y;,.i` J f.n�! � / (J;N- ;�i- ;£�i, (• iM'+�4'I� ,/ ti/'1�:Si, a�,; ���.;'_ ��� 'S'.M1/ slci�`.. .�ti .�/r� _ (^_ti:':a.
:: %..,. C�� ��� g � .��� .s-s� �..
_, i' :*,..:p::r'.�3"�:�'ti� `.i;,.e ' �+'� :i.'.`�:'"�=.4'. s ..r''•y � ��r{4>ar,. 'c, - - �'� :�s�' .
*:Jk` ..ti.4,aK' �b� fF'.;i :�'kt'.�, •.t� `"�`���.'r" �.�.A.� '.u.:- ;5:,�{��'ec :;<..
:y.L�� '�? .�� � �"� ,r:, . - �'���: .i :� :' �k.^,.y,r,�' t . .r�,.., . .;c.- - �'R. ^ .Y' ,�•7-.
- ::�:.+ �: ���' t.'L�. '.n i,i: .!•;>' ':� _ -•lc,..:%r �`E•.
i. ,�t..�'.:�. - .0.,��5., e�.�_-. v:' . et.:,- }'+'.
� }:. S+' ♦ .1'� j';?.• • .T. �' �.�i,�^.�. Y . •'t`0. . �Y,' =�
%tp - ,! J.J'���_ •S..Y 'k..T n�tl.,.
4� •I.. Ii?yy a .�i:'��L� J �kr..,. y.i,�, . �.y�..
- '.G `n. . � :'�=' ``L w ��t. ,i�&..•p'. i.ar :.ari.
�,;�. ..•4x��-�Le'.,`al Des.cr�l�V+t; �oti ay� `� . '.,1;.:'r,.-b• •L�i. .m,:�t..�f.M r - '�+'ti'y 'i. '�`�'
- �:... 9 •�. p. i f`�'..r�I?..xty" �,-� `::,�,_ :.�,,. ��..y. - ;.:;;; �,�; <k:�; �.�-�Y
• •`�" �.t.'n2 ...5�'� � �, a 1.,. -�r ta.. :.�.�.;��.,. . ,-.��.,-, ..�..� •.��_*i*'�O"� � :..ir_,*. ,�.•''iN`�v , :a- �;�.�.�- w ,+�.t:._. E � �:'yl'�'
'.:�;•"°,, �, F'' �� .h i' t _ _ ,'F- i� .s.+'� k �'i':'� -
. •-,ryi��.i�•'-'- .t, ,'i� ?i*-.:i'h�' -r�?"• ,.t,`; • - '�-.;�t.,._;;hv ��5; - t ;Ktl�,,,.;,i f 3r ' c
s- .-y'_'� :.5 ' "'.�'{t''i,"9� _ �A:.>���:�v ,� l . �e' , �e�� : ,r.::Y _.f •`E-.,• � :�j;�, :,j� { `i:+
'�- `-4�.'si?� :y..�.. ;{u; '�.fi '•Y ;r%�o-� . :��:r '�,�''. �z.t: P.t• .1„+f 't.�:;'
,.?' .s ,. ,,�:il?�p. , � ' H{i� � :nr, ..ei . _ .. ° �. �y. ' � ` -1 �'7 ,•.,i� :'i�.:. pi��S;.� y�.�. -.,.,,� : �� : ,�,.5 , �.
�:, .l.'S�� �': !, .i�'�4�^+�;' „r..n ,_iJM. ^.:::{rno.�''s. r�v! .�.,'�. ;°�i., x_ar`tf`.. . - l.`. -.x ;�:.,'��j „fi;'��,
.�'T�t :a`�.3�` l+�y': 3 ` , y t �� .� L ;�; 3 ` yrv�..'�{ �/ � t;�:,� ��',K, '' ` �J '''i. �. *•!;' qa;f�r.v* :�• �' ��rZ ,r�a��. �
�'4,•', '' �. � -�i?;. �3:. - ,��. � '� . a;.. n�- , �
`,r .:,. v;`p: o.r,i� �i�. t ` I �2,r... �:,;. !Y ^�.V �yi. '�+� �I�Y��{7'':`�•�`:i., ! .3,�`.,7 �.l`4i. ..{ S.
�� :. "� � . .L, �. .7,,a`L yA"`r'K ±l�: yy-. ;w}.
f •i-:� �iy"�t �`�k'.. - `�;' „c.'ni.:r�- >-;s�" ..3�ii:..' �t:::_�.�,.;._ - _ :
�+' :�"'n:t.. •�qu�at i �4 ti•i - ,�i3 .tr"...z:� .rc - �;#c.. ,a .�,,.,a+�.,'" ra�T.�.
4. •t �. •L..• •..cr.. i:.�... %;.Y't�''":'<.:::,5� .�` �.�'°{'a - i4 P.r�'�;:i.i i
....,_._ --�....:`.�.,..Xi.:._,_..,., ._._s�4.•. ....-.r�c�•_..,,.�'�e.ts:_ �ia°,-_ ��t _.�r.ai%4.:,....�.r^.. _..:e%':.L;»,`z�'z...,�M.._....2��...:..1H,:._...�...:a.'"�,._,,,. X:':_ . r� �ir..`l..::;'.a�..;�i_,3...._.....�.. . �.. -�,.. ,
� ;�;-:yn.yt.Y �•F: i .,x.,f. :r,y�rn�:s•- • s=2%�.r� . t i + 4' r��;,:;':"4` '� 4. "Y '.� . +.Y� ' r,�. �.C'tiv�:!!Y-".'. _'1.� - . �..y.�✓ xi, :.Y-F�"�.:' a. a-�,-<<;.,.,
.?e��4 .K.r'n��,'-�:v.{i.�,r.if�,`'c,.�"�` �i.�,.�;��s.'�'s'"6;;(;. �`'�"' y`."v.."c rA,..,�} ,�.<. �u--SY ��y., ;;:+h„ �.=`% - .'C:' a+r' .�f,.ty; j�.�� �_.4�'it+°. ��'• ?y;SS'`,i��< :%t;., =�}'}_�..�,�;'.-'e.
{i���: �x.,�f„+. A.� � �t � e�f �er, '� kY4:''.t', 7a�y`y;3•��, `ro��a..t� arice:n �-% �' S, �Y a ''}".i, �„ � :- ':.
ya �;,.Y�'M1 i: ."+�1..��`.�-�.�'�:,,7,.a'ry 1.5j,` .it2'-� i....�•� yai;�"'cs.,i.. nsa..t , .+l�'nt' f F,fp. 'L,;.=.s•;�:s.' �.C.
-�i z�- �'.F3�•-�'}'�i",''a., jr::S•x;. `,-d�r, �.,. .�;.�}E�. .yk � "c.i;�`f;f'..';.�, .� ;. ;��a::.14 ?^_';�'�. �;t �:._,„.�, .
�`+��:i��sa� ?w�.�;:« �s. -:-s ir.� �'*:,'�a� �; ��...�:A�.;�s.�. ,.flyr.iY� ^S`''S��i�;��C '° : ;r.. �� '+, \�,.• ;� .,�.'��..
�� ,.,.�; .�.,��.1�,�s.� �-� �.�:= ��,. „�. -.,��� �,. .�� , qha�i�.ti on aT-°��U.se , �•e�xm'i'�, � °��� :�. i :4. "� , �;•:
�..
, "� .=t.�,Y' ,- ;: �. ;7.:=a ;��:,,;�_.';�^;`�!=-
.,,'s^!.�' •ep ti, ,.t�'rr'°e�a'.,,.�,' .s.: �'�}"' �f t.r - �:. .v:, . j.�� •�iy'" .�� ° ."��y��,�,.�y � �..� ' x.
ii�_ w:t. ���!'�`.�+K' . i � �.�. ,r�: ,;.� �n ..;�r�',.- ..� +' . . ;�-.. ,y+�' ' <� ti�;`�.,: i y4��•'.'e.;;�'e
'�t ♦ - I�f" i�i3.40':''W..v:i `- �,.5 .y'. s � .`2 �•, ' S lS� R V �1 S. ,�� �.�<.:. A' Ae�
� «..;,., ir. .rt ':l :t'.� 1.J 1: !' 'i � �• � s .SL 1•
,r.� �_- .,H t'4.��"�t.�� ��'� .a.��� :,;�:. 'x,: "y�, r ,, �`.�.: ;.1:.0ii y �i 1'•;.O�T�,l :R �i,s:.., �. � jy, r. ,`,`r::;+";s'
»..Z'>,, �t <.p x , ;L�,. rY_ ' � i:�� .#�.•� .2r; -� _... PP � �-;-; T,.r ti�'.'� ' .. y��:��a�%�i � °,. � "
t.,:� 3i � /" s.r .; „ r , �':.�... .F". s``� ,.- t �' i, i ';rr.' 'i;v`:
- .k� +.r" '.,i;.�+:�<-i '�-•' ..�."�`� "a � . -e� +.`�:_:I��"�'"�i � q�"` "'4F:�r.�i� �,;.�i`; •,r•.fW;�,`'..
.`t�`�.r =�r'�'' �: '�' ,P-l�n ..A �'rova-].' _ �.�: ;�;:�� '-�:��,
.�� . <.�• _ .,: ;�r� '-�'�'�:.; '�,�� _ ..�: I?P. _ �•�.;� f.., ��r.;�. '���_'� :-t,::=:�<c
" .�.'�S,' 'J` .J,yfr,•;;fr'%"- h'� / f.�a���...:.�'i. 't. '�i�s �.:.. �QC i -�',i a`'Y.1
- ,i: _ _ „k„��i•r:•s _ .f �. :z: ;.� Yr�f:lJ,';��'�. .Y.. `,�K�f`'y .d. --t�r°�. xa
. .�y�Y"-' n.J,a�. �e:tn. rvf.C'�� iY�.r S5�'!j'i i , S� n ' Y ♦ �t. . ;S ,liy� t�'y�:i ..�F4e: ��': i ' .t
'�1"•S:^wYsrv 'p:., z �Y�r��;�r�;"''�.��-.,.:�, ��- �:;�i��:Co�ici�`ti.tinal..Use Pe'rinztr-for� :Li:D"'�°: .� .,a�,^�->`i���
'`i'; � ;�. �'Y�' '�'r ���;h;: � r� `` ; a. �. - .:7, 7 `'�" 1
...�";c 5•' .� , ;,�` . 1 . � .• . �N '- s _ :� i� ' '� .,. "r`•`, .5`.. s..
�' � � .�, '' � - ��: � •'tl�,„ � . ., �„',S I 1 . � .' • . - ' '6' a{'� , �'��� w �
- i k �i. •!:. '' �f. , - '7S'. ''f..Y,�::�'.,:'-� . Y �',e:, ri. y1t''?
. • � -� �y . -�.: .=�: �; � .�.x � Minor`. Condi i s s. , �: • . � :
, . _ . '�1 . . ,..s.;�,.r ,� ..:�':. ;�,.. t onal;=Use�Pe`r'mi �t�> , x«��'_'�.r,��:;n�a=`�':,.
� ' , t. ry �.A " �' S":' �S•.. ..
, . ;. . , a .v S� ^� �.; t� 3 r `,- . ✓"::. .;d', _
�' _ . . . • . . . � y .� �� - : Y. , • • ^ • ' iq ` ��=t , ��4 � - ��?+.�' ,�y�'i`_'^ .
, . . , _ ;� - ..z:�' •�: �w..�.�� Rezonin j• � ,.;.�`��•`•���� - ..�, w.�;��"r�.�., _
� �«,,. + y,.
. . � � � , .. .:�. , _.. -,u �` '� ,, 5 .. y �.;�•�^_w,r� :;p':...#'„;;e�.�;�,;:,;:i. . ' ;
'�fi. •: .,: , .. �,�_ ', �_ .::=.,- .; `•.; :':r;`• .: -.'• .. ... , - 4'., .;. :
. .. . .;2^ s:+;r„ .y�. . :,'=, x�;� �•' .{ - �`n:'�T.. � n-f `•�'
� � � . , . , . ".'1.�'. .1� . � '���11..t�..� i',rr i4�` N ' `
- �'- � �,, .r�.., Wetl`ands � Permit , . �:� ':rr� .:��"; ��:.a�,�, .
- .. � �r �3'x:�'- ,. t:�iF�t-. �t'ti`'
. . . - Other � . .. , �:;' f:r;;� - . • ,, t ;� .
' . , =� ;f ,t .` :�' , . �5�_. - � ` " -.',��• ,a... �' '
� . • . • - • _. .. , , _, . . - . - , . . • t��:l�;:- ,. ,�, . - �'* -
r
- • - _ - , . > _ _ , �
. ' , �ia • , • . . -, , ,
•.i.. . .. , �
� , . . . r
. - . . j
0
CITY 0� MENQOTA HEIGNTS
MEMO
February 17, 1983
70: P1anning Co�nission
FROM: James E. Danielson
Pubiic Works Directar
SUBJECT: Nenrich P1at - 1875 Lexington Avenue
The Henrich's live on a large iot ihat has ample area but not eno
ta be legally split without a variance. The lot has an easement
south iot line that provides access (driveway and utility} to the
behind and utility only to two other homes behind. There has bee
sewer stubbed into the lot to accamodate this spiit. This proper
and baunds so a plat needs to be prepared with an extra 17 feet o
way for the Gounty along Lexingion Avenue and a permanent 20 foat
and driveway easement along the south property line.
ugh f.rontage
along the
hame directly
n a sanitary
ty is metes
f right of
utility
I recommend granting the 10 faot variance ta the north lot and ap rovai of
this preliminary plat subject to payment of the�•required $600.00 ark dedi-
catian.
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
22 February 1983
83-OS
Peter Henrich
West of Lexington Avenue, South of
Orchard Road
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of Subdivision `
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The applicant proposes to divide his property which currently has 190 feet
of frontage on Lexington Avenue, into two lots. The northerly most lost
contains an existing home and is proposed to have 90 feet of frontage with a
depth of 228 feet, equalling 20,520 square feet (15,000 square feet
� required).
2. The second lot�would have frontage of 100 feet and a depth of 228.35 feet
thus having a lot•area of 22,835 feet.
3. Your Public Works Director may wish to comment on the additional right-of-
way dedication needed for Lexington Avenue. It would appear from the survey
that the existing rigNt-of-way is 33 feet from the centerline.
The survey indicates, however, that dimension of 50 feet from the centerline
which we presume to indicate the location of the new right-of-way line.
4. You will note that the existing home is setback 57 feet from the old
right-of-way, therefore suggesting that the additional 17 feet will place
the house 40 feet �ack from the new right-of-way line. As you know, 30 feet
is required for this front yard setback.
�
�pplicant
?.T�.me:
C, c3 S C I�10 '.--'--_.� �_ C�-------------
City of 1�9enc3ot�� llc���l�ts
llakota County, !�1:innc�sota
APPL�TCA'I'ION FUR CQNS I �};RI�'1'ION
of �
PLANNING }2F;QlJF5'I'
Date of Applicat on�,��3
� JC�
F�.e Paid� ?_� -� �l "`3 �'f r-,r ���/c/�-
�
=e C �� �� __ I�.
L;�st r irst Ini ial
�
�d r'. r � s s: � 9s._�/_l �I S f..c� I�v l�_t. � l.��s�s.� 1ti� �SIO %
Numl�er and Street City State 7ip Code
O� ner
�TulflE° -
Last
Telephon NO.
i L
First
�ddr�ss:
1�TumbEr and Str�et
Str�ct Location of Froperty in Question
L�_8O t-���-��-r}N � ---
L�gal Description of Property:
Ini ial
ity State I Lip Code
"'.;;r� n: ?e�t��st : Rczor.ing
_�,,�— _variance
Conciitional Use Fer it
Sul�division Appro�al
Plan Approval
Otl�er ( Sp�ci fy )
�L��►--52, y�Ll:�_1_I.L�LI
N
I)ecember 21, 19�2
To Whom It May Concern;
Ws, the undersigned, have no objectians
ta Leo and Marcie Kegl.er building as close as
3{} feet from their front line on Lot 4,
P�.OL'I{. �. � Sun View Hills. .
l � .c ��i�L��-C,c� .
r
r
i` (� � �� ���.,� �:�
.�-�--• �r�
�-,�-�-_ �-�--�`- -- � �� 2Ja--,�:,.
c'�!i fl�' s �o�-�-�.ti.Z�.=� �,'.:,�.r-�. '
kl'<�{ �1 � ��� .
� .
��
��.-�� � , .�,-<«_ �
�
�, t . .
;:� ,
� '
'� .
,
,
PL�ANNiI�IG REPORT
DATE:
CASE i3UMBER:
APPLTCANT: .
LOCATION:
ACTIC}N REQUESTED:
PLANNING GONSIDERATIONS:
22 February 1983
83-07
Leo Kegler
Eas�. of Hunter
Nor�h of Mallard
AppravaZ af Variance to Front `�ard
Setback i
l. Mr. Kegler was in last week to discuss wi�h us the placement of
house ta be placed 30 feet fram his front property line, which
side af Hunter Lane. A variance is needed here inasmuch as the
hause on the bl'ock, awned by Mr. Mathisrud ilocated two lats to
is setback to �he rear a£ hi� Iot a substantial distance off o€
Lane. Under these conditions, the Ordinance requires hames to :
at least half of the average dis�ance that the hames wi�hin a b
set back from the front street line. Though there is no additi
home ta the sauth {narth of Mailarcl}, Mallard 5treet i.s not bui
the next home �Go the south af that is located near Lexington. '
there may be some guesfiion as ta whether ar nat a variance is r
required a.n this case but we felt it would be best to process s
variance so as ta make sure there is a clear t5.tle to this prop
structure an this particular lot.
new
the east
ther
he north)
unter
set back
ck are
al
and
us,
lly
h a
ed
2. We have examined the terrain on Mr. Kegler's I.ot and it appear abvious
�.hat building �he home near the street is the most appropriate alution.
He has prepared a cantour map indicating the new gracles to be f lled in
to the frant and to the nor�.h and south of his house. This pro sal will
allow for a walk-out basement on the east side and would appear not ta
involve fill �atceeda.ng �he 900 cubic yards that are allawed wit aut a
Conditianal Use�Pez�mit.
3. We sug'ges� the Planning Commissian and Council examine the cont ur map
�:
submitted and �he seetions proposed so as ta evaluate`the merit af tha.s
proppsal. This has been reviewed with the Publ.ic Works Directo , wha
concurs with us that it appears �o be a reasanable solution.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
February 16, 1983
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Kegler Variance - 1880 Hunter Lane
The Van Sunview Hills subdivision has been developing from north to south.
, The lots in this subdivision are unusually deep and the homes to the north
have been constructed at a set back much greater than the required 30 feet.
Mr. Kegler's lot would have a drainage easement and wetlands to deal with
if he would construct his home in a similar location on the rear of his lot.
He wp uld like to build his home at the standard 30 foot set back and because
City Ordinance requires home5to be 30 feet from the front property line or at
the established set back line he needs a variance.
I can find no reason not to allow Mr. Kegler's request and I recommend
granting a+ 170 foot variance to the required front yard set back.
' � � Case No.
. ',�.�. . ; � � . � ' . GITY OF MENDOTA H�IGHTS . � �
. . . : �;" _ � {`;.s;,-,�;;=F - : �° • DAKQTA�� COLINT}Y;r MiNNESQTA . , . < '��'_•: . .. , '
.. .y.,:,.�:,y'�.. ``''.A�, ' ";rv..`!'-.'+�.,''•,�:'• _ < t '�. ; :�,-�.t`.. `a`.j�`.", .. yrR� ;fi; '�i�,'.,;�:% .:�, ;i,; � ..
+ �' .,t%x,�5 �i n r.^�_ .:.�,. � �•5}.. � ° � �" •• s;ixi ^>�.;.w.R. o �•h`a'�M.Frat. , : . ' ^ : .. .� ..
"'�. :�.."'�.f'; .. ^''-.' Cj� -."e . :I �, •r ."jf'�v• �rFp��� •r�.��' �
„��-`,>,;.. ��.,.�: � .:�;�: `: >;APPLICA ION�",'FOR".CONSIDERATION.��.�; '�'�� �•�'�:���� .�' �1�'�=y ��"•:`
`,f.'[.. iti;;C,�.i'f�� :�'."t�X �.�.. �;���,.. .ry f rt,yi.p. �„ :�r.sre..r,pt�.._, �, A . s'' ' t, 2';+'.y.'r'��,.:i.i�@��;,<�.-
, i��' .. ;A�'f� .�i�{��f.ifrr't�R ��nARN.:= �tr . ��hYj-:iit��"v#`. ` . ;,;�::q��.�Y�tiY ^5`Sd�: �kT`Y ..
, ' � � . �: "�• • ,.f: =' ��'-'.:>: , ' : �,, t?',; w .
� '1' .:'Y, �3x :t"'J�i'�� �7 `i�i.,.7a�L+,4tiLY'�,...'��.�iw5'..�' .t•,�r.i•.... k^ �C,^: '�4w�. ".iC't� t.� .l':"a".
, „��.' `�+7 :
' �f)„!f' , : Y" �*...w L.'"^ t )= _
, : ri � '1 � � : 5'.,t!t�• � � . �� � x�• ;k i', �. '" . . ;, .�'y. ..d �.. �.• i'i'T',i'�.`Y�v��x.� r ,,�
Y�;� '�>:,., 7 "•'' _ ;; �.�. .+" -f' ` ,'�4..< •_. .ti `� .. .
- . .. ,..,,.�,;,;:, :,i,'=�r�`:�,�. ��.:�',: �;;i,�n=PLANNING�.FREQUEST.,-� •. ;' �Y•�•,, , -.;,� ,
:'f - Y a :F :fY� �4 •� f �i �~, ' •!: ri�,: _ `*i4;4..�. . �'k. �� � 2�'"'�Z
;.':�' .:r�f:'-t��-',�� rLr"r :�r;;.`fa-.. ta,�,�{'..i;:,.��Kit,fi.i3,: i>.• '' ��:., :,a..t�, x,. �='.�i � J
�, ` ,' ' � 'S�' J
« . .._}`. �� :�f;,..; q,+:i ?' � ' � ': .� z-"� .r z;� - *r.l + , 5„^, _ .
'F.; r''�'Y: ' '''..,:. _ i,• tN:� s w't- ..�`I; ..F.1`.wz, 'M1; #<<��:fin�,Y •fF' .ii.'`..' 1t�� ?:i- n�g� +ft i
"+' ''�: :.Fl`�' ,. k��_ ��r.tiw:3C9''` ".'it":.�j Y:":'t»�ti.• �`sa x -t'�T.,v �V r `,r�. � Z�y,r¢` - �•-{p _
�, a . E;' Y ,i.., UZ
�?• �:�i��'r:t.�fi'�r ' K=.�:7'''a;,:<� ��'�{4,'.. Y�Y: i:, °.�. .Z.=11 �� ,
, �r:�: ,�.o ':r:': ;�,�,�:. E��,.�F;;.: �_ °Yx` :, 'i�_�- �Date af,Appl�iaa+�ion,' .%, /
+,> : -t-.2'.='i�. }'� :,�•<�'�.t l •:iN' ��i:•.iy!}p': '".y:':ii;� � ° e�!^�''j' f'�;�i„G i.f fvrµ 'L%`�i: f.. � s'• J�t I `,.g�� �' '
_ 'Lj�•a�-•t• rk. ��".`� '�i� s�t:i r�:.r��='*'�'+ro;�:;��'.v.;�_ c.+���.r �'.F..'+'s�',�.;&.yi�'� .; �, r. •iY.F'i. ,ta,t �i` .t �+ l� .1;a.1�S� 4fFsirp� /� 'i,'t
• afti"i.r��.'a+.:� ..�;;r..��'ryka:Fr,�..},:'iiY r3s,y�:.�::..'S:::i<.'�:i�='�.�.�.:� - = : 's>yk,���w�`;a'.Y;r.i�?=' •S:: i'�f£;.�St� y�JrV�7:'`'�"?�'r. .+'�. .-/1-T " °t+
,��1�.yci•.�.,,�;� zr �t :�� ..*�,: N.a';�wG'�•M,s� tr.e`v;� °^�'%�� ,t•-a • ..S�t.���:� t, F -
��I: p �.YF`r5�'�y,.t ;� `�tt:;�'.� ', f..r"t�;� v,';�;• .� ,.5�. p<{•Ci``;'. :*i.' '-f.� �r�. ,r.+ �,T'E� Y� OS�.t''.ib
:A lYcarit: ;r:��',- _.�,��.;.�:,� ,�r�'�::•.x1.��:u ��..e.�;��;:,�;:�a:.e:3:.�� ,� :;_., . :,i. 750�;.ry scr w�:t p .;
. I?,. ` ,;�_ i� u - ../� Y ra� �,�' ,:r';'} , ��
a ._ ,%:F,..F �';4.�.yh'"jta1� 'S:;!•. '�yi"^..,^''�:-,aFrt�7r.:.c3:;3 .�.��1.�e`� �.Sw-nC;..,;'}C`,t� ~`i' j,+,.at�..,i^�.:{...r''E.�6 �-M+,�;..y -�t.-k�%;
^ ,:i,' - 'i �� K;�i`"s:'�:'�.:w' "�,• s�'=.G'.'r. Y:� •F . �-T';. s, :e i v.�r"�e i9, �..>..�.,.�'�; ..�"Y � ��;� F:,e`.'.: .. „4�',�� _
;�t��Na�tte: �' '' <`� , �, ^� Richar�,,. ,,.. ,,�.,_, ;, -. ;j. „�...:���:��� .�';;;.`:�:.,.
-�r��::�x _ ::iPa�rarito � ,:� <��::,;:r;s�:�.�:....., �.��•�>h;,. <,Mh,��� � � I�I. � •.,.� .
`. {�y iei:t:;.:�"K�Yts.,,e. . µ� .. _' � r:r:::'
y; .-�J': . ��"V4 -y/:y t�'.i�S;C���i.n "wM.;.� i>'. `:�.a. 'N' . ":ha}�\ %�!'i:+SY �. s.*.
;��' „> �r� s��as.t'"� ?,= ;���� ..r.� ;First,��;:�z �,,::- ,, �In3.tial:.w: :��w.r �;..k�, ,�r:;:.�,.-��:.•�.,���,
':ra :? M ;! ;�£:,,"','� I �T .j'I. �.3i�t�J ' V'. . '..C' t t, :iF'�� .�. � f'�• �,� : � ,l� �.,�N.' ,�k g .t`'.:� ar
7":' ,y:�'"• a'z�',<Et.,^.Y�,,,� ,,�, � .t�r � ..b': ,a. .�:i. �Y.r�; .i!': >,e ;•�:..� .,y'aTy:' - � ....f:�;.;<::�±.s a±.�.
.'!t'"•. f:..t, ,:;C'h.. �� .«1:. i�:.�;., } ' ,at� .�* .,}^, �' . ✓.� e.:5't r �nL�,
�:, y �,; ies� .4qs^f ii"•. i`'^1 ,�,r..': s�-'' ` `+$��,k: •3.',:t„:�' � `,,�. :4 �' .:Jtli%�4.�, � - �- ' `� '
.S •,;�;. ^rj ,c ���.F,�::i.rtiF-rr.; 'w.,i. f,K-� ty.'�•F:'t^,i,*s.��': «��` i;�: _ ..�•.,, ;I:. Y�..K�:> "t�i' _•�FA'irkw" ,i
'{`„ 7 .�,`,i. .:i; . :.t2:a'�Z`�M�Kr'*'3%,+ . P..��..7.;�j �, %?:'�:' �x.' �.k � t.�'t:t.< ,,.+�,:r i ��: y •.. ij'S��e`:ai '.�'f �� �.?��
'�: :2,�� t'>S.s,aR= ''x. -:.4"+-'.�.Y+'t�yrr+"�' "'k _ :°G:' f a,. - y�j',r.t�,r ���.' S.b •,.:t.
_ . t t-
�.�;��..,,.t ;�� .�, �.r4.� ,;g• ,�: �� ':s::,� ��. �'� :L,�,�.Miiiiiesota:=:,};:;�,:�.: � 5�53.04��'��:w��' -�
,� �F E_ �;`Address.<�:�:1'603�;Universit °.Avenciei .Sta.:�Pau1;� :�;�k:;�:- ,4`�'��'�?';` r. : ,
,,;, .ft�,� ' : ,-';;. :}' c`.,y;-:' '•
��' . el+i��.<'� ��51�7�'�'��,,, .>: � •.i^ i�r,�kr����+.1���`.,� �7t�'• •�.,u .liw,; �.�.. � . .
��'.3''� v. `NL1Ii1�.)e%. �x �S =E.'et.:"=c:.v.j'-'='= - _v.'.t�i:r..�r+�'iit ~ ,",'°vi:•;�,;., '� •i e�sri:� 'ri`,'��ui�%'k,FeJ."� j, `�-;;;-'�:�;
��::i".i.'„ ..i���S� �,-� :'•i�l, - .f _� �es}..�a,��i:�:�'t's` -:'4„ y�`.�..',.'rY' .�.5^"�.•�M1 't. Stc�. �:..j`^;,t'j� �,�, 7+ p: e} �"
+�,� . �'.J.�" ;'+�,'
:,.+�:''- _�% '�' .}'.n r �T t'i,f^ ;Y! ♦ �. '.<,s�.,4'.. ;:•' �«'.
� ars'c <•,'t7.?�'' ;�s�;rq�. :x� r�.,o 7 "�?,•,:y:,-_�`+''?�c,�s:i+z-�%^�a. �,. �r.-uoi� Ss� = sj�,?,;,'r�"�'.', 1;lr.+.tcs��- .'��`.r�. M:1 •t: '.
f�` .1� Y» Y .i:#.�>y'`3�: �; ; f,e". ' tr'% ;a,*� t' �l . v� ..k. , c�.x =�^ �
Y r�L >...x�,;... {' �' i'.`'::y . t - „ r�.,. ; �.,,: :: :��,;w�.,.
,t.��y �'''�� - y';.`^�,t'1.�r'�- `�?:: . 3:. i;i sa., ^-"�..�'.� ki � , _ 't.: �.. I R,�
• .�i' •S,� . �:�.:t p.i' i�">�� f ..i' i '"� nt,«, 7;�:: .`i.k��... „d�:it'/.
i�',��. ��7..% ��{.FY`��:i INr.. �'�� t . ,M,. a.�. +{y.Ji.7�..;::,_
,, r x,.. •t `".t:,� y�"�� +�y�. �',�, �:�.: ¢"' ,L ,�
' :� r.�rit N� 1 �� +1.': ��S°.','.�'��+:�.' � ��,,..�w: ;,f�i CK;� n: � �.+r.�'-.q. 'Hr�{x•x� r 1.y�'��a"t:' �-y. f ,
.Tel'ephon.e'�;Numbex. :�.646=2638>,. Y�.. �,,.��t;'''� '�,,��".�r,,;, c ;,.,,, ..,.�. � , ":��F:,;,� � �. �. • �,, ��.,,,�.;3yCyt�w�`� °ti ;-� :
'i;�: . � . , a �• : •i�:�i• t'.,i� � � 1 � e7'fi�1'1 �Y ({'�: k zY .a
�c.YyY,:K'•,, . 1 �F� nJ'�1°j a3K`.,� �', y. �', `� �,y+ •�K;`�'
. Z�:n ,.�.'';.:,`?.+ ;:�'i'.,.�.L'•�.. L. �'.t"'� ��:;P. . , . t' �1. . .Y rs. 7;Y� 'i.: �^r,.yg,r.
' `S.. .. 'r _= .. :� i. `%*# „ s. ,i`s��j,y.s�,'9rt✓1. � : , , '. - . i' ;_ ;;#� t;ai'.F?+:�.:�;''_ , y
' Owner r .,�r : ;.: ,•l�:.��. �'��`Mar �'� ,. � .. . . � A. and ' : ;=t"'' � + "'' ,,Z:�`-'� ; - .
•��-.:�� ���. = .rc,�rie'y, ;. '' �:�; �; _ � y; , �< =��` ,�,;. , �' :�.,;� : k:
,,� ,,. � `��.�,:.,.. �.�';;.."� ,. . •: : . ,.�
. ; "� �' �iamas " - � . . . . _ <.Wi
���� Name: :�;.`°Z.. Cur3`e �s'a;��i.�.::��r'��:� 1 ,�,`., ' p _ �Husba d~'an@-, fe;•� -:.
=:�..�. rt�: , -.��,- �Last�:�;;° x�iv".��<..>-:;����'�� �; t . . r - - � . Initial �eac :- n un ,v ed � �
,�..� �•:;�� f,.. � Eirs ,,
,..v: > , . .. � t; "` �� �`-' �"r" �' • . • . , .
. ' . i. 't. ,.. : ;t�,. or. !F :r..:'� t � �r, f Y (.:�:��y�_;,,`'_ ' ♦ • �
� - �>:::,,= ,�� :;� .: °� :::�: .. •" . . , .,.�. �'inter st. .: _•Y.,,
_Addre � s : ` "��' , ,
� =�'1�51=:Lexin �tori�=Avenue=South,��.���Fendota�,Heights,` •MN� =}';;�`.�55118�<i.,;:�_ .
' � '':'� •,1R..r. . , . ^ .�. , .
. . ., , �.; .Nuinber' &% Street �:,:. . - .y:s�� ,' City - T, .. .... Sta�e- � .. •<� - •
. =ZiP�:.� .
. : ,,. . 'i• a .^_�;',`.. . :.• ..,-".,.:>,.;,�{j .,�;. •.::r: ' ` _ . . . . . . . ', . . • � .
Street�Location` of��Prop'erty=irn�Question: .,' ° � . " � .. � , "' . `� � ` '- .
� . �� �i ' • ` ,.�� ; .. ' ��` t;: ..:. ' '' " " ' ' , - ..-'sn, ,. - '. .�
� " Southeast of•.Soiitheast��,corrieir�;f�of �Lexingtan �Ave. ".and �Hwy.n:-130;. Mendo.ta�YHei"' ts.,'�•.MN'^���':``.�°� s.x�> >
. ; .,• �4�,,
' ls:� .t: �1, � _.,'7 ..r':t=,.y'.. ' .r' . _ , ' . • ' ' .. . •9;.,ri f,"�. 5 :;i� :U.,•`,..;i..:�,- ' .
• -..�� x+ 'j�f•����Yct:'. 5�f#:.'.' _ .:; _ :�::: .7 •N• i_�.;r�r. �i�lr�
`• ;'f!� -� , : ... 4�: i S` .
_ .�� �. i;:= ',�•" :a.,.,, :�' •i',�A:'c�';,�.-i;;,�..,.•=;'•:;;�:,or.H't'. tx.'ij.�,,,'v .,�t'�:�:
-Z,ega2,� Descr,ip:X2on. of�.Praperty,.'.�'• ` ,� .,'� }'� b.>�. __:;�� . � , �f ; :.g ,�'
�f'� � c •1 �8�:. ���i",����'r4'�:�~ ��. ' t :'s.. i;•� �. �4 � � .l�:1�.5 :�.,, _ C.a.
.. ;:G."�S!���{ii�"'ti'��:a:��:��i.id�'�i�•.�t1'��lG'4 t�,:.j ' J.a ts1� �Si r.l•:µ :Akjf��o'1�1/�.� 'f - it ' 1` . '1�' _ �i �y �la•� ,.
' � ��i,. .d .`�::'. ,'s'*r� .+.e�b,� . .�. :a'" x. �^, '`�"''y .
'I�"� . �%'. h :F ^.'+: 3'; a�p..: ti..i• :�'y`t� ^��r :�r� � f ^ ',rt;. ,'yn .a: ..e:�' � �� � . . :,,j •.`�'' '�k": `��;�'33N9. 'i
e,'.i�:;• _�t ., },_.; ,�,s.''r r x±. `'� .�.'� `�'
�. . ,>iit, ,r. ,:z. 3:<• `,�-' .i•'� ,+Y�wx;�?..,:.. �s. {',.i, �;i., :*:^' �� �� � r«-.s.� .
-�' .o `=J:��,thrii;� �;�Biock .1=y.aria=� 0iit2ot�:Bi anci;`�Outlo���C {�- exee t �the`wWest-:�196�;.f ee .�of; the=:North -�: ��
��'' _ rf-. L ts��l Y.9 r_ �°' � . � ._ �: � P '���_
>. ... . .e< 4 .,,�:.,_. .,� �. �i..:,�.�_- :�x.
;..�.�.'�5 � �py „i�,y;,`Y;�+j��s.!,. :i+tyi�4�,. .11,5�Y�%14:^i.i' 1�'}. 'I�:.;;;t••.�'��;�iyt� ��:,��.:.�": •. .r:: , " • . z.�1t , y; -�ti :;L;t.M�.'o'�• r�;:'Y
,.tt;. x•!�' .u�ee7 ,i:�xe r ..Y�S�.`.:.., _ _ ['•�..�'3,f.- ° :,t°.1t��s. • , #}�,.:1:�� � ';',
7�'4`..' �,�: ,�a�.,:' ' ;� '`='r ft-�* - :�;r�,..�� ',..,Y
.;.:f'.z.' ��'.'.. �it_ • x s'r'. �: �� l:G�: `;`.,�5: �'�'', �:ifd':j}", .3:a'Y�C:.*�c`,.i
.`�.• ,�.�:��.'185F��feet��;and�,��ce't;�th��;Ea.'st=230°'tfeeC:��thexeof;',Curley�;�s>;Va11.e Vieur.�� .�: ti' .� ��i.�.
Y t: F�.-:, w�•`;:;�'r.•:�;�'r�.r::•tsr:*r��`�-?s���c;F='
� `„��`�.�,�.� 'S . ,s,R,'ii'.. ;F,a. ;;rt r� • 9 v-:-�Yeyx.,:. ,->%. .''•i5�:•,. ^R _ ^i��r. a' . - u;tb�,� A :x atD' v'�` t",'..!" '
, ' c' f ' , �'. � 1� .', i. -�y,�"`^4:k'1 ^.7.' • . � ..tx. ., • 1 y. . � _ `�t `.+.� � : t ��� y. "ly�� p �' :.cr
� r.7 "} � _ .:i ta , . i�y� .7�,', �.i�':.. L� » . �:t , s r' ��.;'? ° ;'Y'',
" , , ., � � x' '.J:yt¢.t':a Y��',f=,' . .r� • • t��si"�' . . .,. :.;� �5' �t� F �� o ' : �y. t„;t t z . ^i. `� ,
� ... `1" 'k .p^'.�.:."r ,,o-' �•� :5� ;°=��,..7it i�i:v,*e,d" ;i.�jl:y�.. t'.i.i`. o-a;6":o�:' ,
� .,: � .: .:'a , .r.'�:d�', i�:#�;,•.,�-.�;;t
, .. . r r�i �i= .t:c ;ywt,s�,..>. �.A �.�i• ' _ ��>• „rr.r. .i',t i k; .4:::,9 i. i�y"�d'�cu,�,f�k;; .`s.,,'$`ga`"•�.,
"''Y sa�;, ;'gi: .y;..v='e•;�r', *(}"�..E:i�y'c;:�:.� . ::r �:�,�'yM i-�;.�,�;`:tt}�,. �.y' .t;,. Mr,^-�:. ,a
�Ma '� '4. '�'l��i��^.y �`tu .�:'tf'I�a�J�'.T..fi� '�Y^au.45�.ja:f:wt.��i�i'�,�T'l•' .MF `P •,,7 � '2� � I:�'� �%u n,Z:�+1���. l��l.>���: :JM.
� « . . i . ; • �,�`i. �.S• :^i�' R ��...;;,• r'' . ,d - ' �]'; ., e S.F . v .e ` :,. ' Z• n ";id: !y� �' '' l�iyh s' 3•. T �,rj' �:^•,�', n ,`':ri.' n5
: �: e.t ,F.: _•!; }•^ -'-t':�.5�: . y: r'i _ r:. wyi �� ,�'(-. . f. �r'', .� �. t . C•: .7&;, , A��i' . , C!r::,.7+.r.: 3+.`^ y ��.,� �,,. . a,
.,R ..'t. ':i� .`,^ �,.�i'� ::�.r ia;: �:Y�.�:�. .�K} r • L nr, , �i * 0,4:;� . .� � {�.; _
.i. s�r..R,_r 'rA:s`?�•'� _�. `i:.;. -:r...,. +••:}.-. ;,Ycr;�;v: �'-t�' �:
_ f . x•� �4 •�'i ; t�'��" W •,, "s .�.
YF -* _Z �'.�,.�iA�li'6�.:ti
:x::`;;nsi �i:d=A: v.f�'." � e;Efi•i ~f.:e_�s.+::. __ " ' . -'- :C:': '�: :bi..i.;:.fy<i�f :1i �..�,y,5`ui::;+ li .,�r'„�;; " ' .
. � '„t'�:�. K,: � i�:.' �. ..{'';. ,.�.. �'.�`''l. ` .. ? rt.'w<,�. t.i'' ,t l.. . t,, r3 �. �s.,' t ,
.r .5i"+Y^-�':';rr�•T ,,�K:.�' 4.?..4:.��'.:m'"�.e: .. i,� tP�' :M1:. y.�;�y:q•w:�.!'�,,+;h.Y's`� »b3, '� .
', • ' -aM;J�.ti�.{wa. '�y�Wi�'. . .,'i(.'��"� • f , �,I• . �Yi.� . . • ..1�,� x. , ��„ . i.` .�i� � .
'.�` •:> ..<� .3.. ';,ti `�y' .`x:e:`,^ava:e.^�• •�: '"'; ���p ',�� �lr �•��:� �'�'�.i:�':�.:�".��n.:'C'.: '+i:.s .��
� ' � 'e :off Re uest : � �:t;,' ,�-» � . y ;.,: ,��..,�:�.:.�� �� : -;,, .,••: �:t . , ��, :ti �'�� �:::SL'-�-�:, "�r- -
3''p .. ti �,� : ` ., .:. = , . . ;r. e'zon ' .: . . r .t+, ;,
�:Y`"� � «a� ;�'s:+� ' b'' ,tin. ..� ri :;e':a' :t��y, "rc't.;,: .h,ia..t..,��� .t�t' .
"'-�c. o� .:�a. ; #^ ��' ,,v•.�v_,.aaz� r.l^ . n-.ve>�':. ;=�i "� "s-..''v ���'�.tw"_ F iY�' ; .��t.•=!z= �:�:e. i.,.
t.c ea�zx5.xz.�r.i:..jgi. �''��� � ..C�� _�`: ,#%�i.. . �.n � � €t,:" ;�,..y�- � ''a 'r.t`:, , , � • • r ,e. .i':� . : `��
;�,..V..1 1 #>:>_ �..�- �, t+ .; ,.;"k
�� �=:°; .:_}�:��r � �� t :Variance�
., s� _ � -: w.�..Yk�a; Zati^`.�.wt G=• .t. ..i� .zt � � rt�; .,;,� ; �ga�'_�r.. ;,y .. _ , cy , _ ' ' • +:�. _ '
. ii.�;�". �� ; . _y+i; r ,. :.' "-� '��"�. x .t+ � '.F. ;�� �.
t 'i.t�`, �fe�. n. �. ti: t: l "P ' t l; �,�.i:ko c t!n�3 x rk, +���� ^M M�1�',,. er_
:.�='�'t, -.!�,�;����:'�'��{s:;"��:• • �..r;=';;, ,:.;. :,;;,,,.;.-�'N ;Conditional�tUse errnit : �;s;.;,w :.r;.�j _.,�,4;.,t?
. ,�t%',4`., , .=SI'' �.r, '+;i� 5;.yr: � . _ , ' ',�S � "_ X.•"• i� �i;�,,,.,,�i,� . .
, . �.' '�r„'°.�..:Canditiorial:;Use:Permit��or:i'..U:D <_:, : . ,�J,a�,�•�;
.a.> �;:, � :� � Y�:t; :4; ;�, t ���,.,,'"�:. y,,:z�L v.-� ;,.ti ..��-. .
s"t;� ., a -.>��. A�k� • . � � °.t,x�.'�`*:�:,� .=t :4�,"�:. �s,:; �n�^;�:.
'���R:� ':�,: �,.: ;�: .w�:,, � - `��," �Minor.�Cond'itional: tTse P"e'i�uiiC' -3 � �`� „� �+:?� F.;. .
„�o: '«<'r,. . :.r..`"bs'E ����',��'Fr�,�'1F;; �+ %.i'. - :,6' t ':,jC:��vo'xi'E•'.' '� �t : cy;�t','.�`"> + �';
�'-� � J � ' � S�' .�
� � � ,;�F;�.: �;�`� `. - :t: °. ' k,y..;�= Subd ivisiori:'�:4 roval� : a...::�,�X;,��;,, �,���> .` ; �,,�; : . �, „ ., 4.;:,'j;:.
�r;� . . __ _ - _ . , _ • ;i;`;"s,'' ^ _ s
4} <. �-_. " .,.. P� ��,. r : �. � :.,:; �-�.�
ri'�i.�:f'::"a� ��'', . . ";.fjK.�� �.b�F��.,< �s'..�.�Y<;ri�4Y �..� .¢',:=�:�,4, F ., ,. ;.�,�.,'•` ,{.a!�`� �+:,k;':i.,`' .
a ;��' :�. ,_'.� ,.x�* ti :�r�'� >.�, R1ari';APProval �.. �� _ .•. °-�+ •
�t;: , �, .. � �.. .. :. •:: , r: � .n��� , ...
.. . � :.:.�.;,...;
. .,' - �,;��:�r,,,��;;`; i. ;r°� - W�`'� n�Wetlands��Permit _ �. ��-����' t `'�'` ��`j'�af.�..,;,:�_
, ... ��1-�y, r`:�^��� ;h; ...tR ",i't, `x'�v"s'f:,,e;a,;�-. : . ,Y:f.bs:: i`i'��� _ i't��,l«'.�.� �'�=:?.Y' :�E�'in;.
;:., ,.���.xr::=:����•-�r�;ryi' w.t�;:=. -�_��.:x- _��:: =�.Ottier ''�.-,- ,ts-.t::. - .:. °;� �.<<-. „`� -
�t '� M':F.�• y. � -. ie,�:w. . , � i��, , �,�`,. � ' . . ' ; 'y" � ��� r a� � ' �� �� s
.. `Z,_�`,iN�: i,^ ' _•,L',t` �i,r,'� :.�i, i�; - ':�4•+�.;!< .. .a. � l.y��ls��, 4'��iy+:� �.3 `KM,1y.Y.;�: �sj.,�, ` '
,S :t�.-=�.���r,�Amendmeiit��to��zoning�,�ordinanee..v ., • , �� s��:-,_�,.-�»�.k:�s <w:::_: . > .�;_#... - _ ,
�i'; • ':` ' . . _ . , . . ��. " .r,r�' .
. . . ., , , �i. S:- _ , , . . , '..
r ,� ,. . n „ . ' . , i` . " � � s' s „•.,� ::._ , . .
. 7 " w�i ;'w.�! . ..'F'i, • pF{ � 1.N�,k�. ; s'�.L.�„rM. .l r . : .f 1.1�� ' ..•� u •! 1 . � _�.. ^ .� r �
' - M1,t , ., i; � 'tf,��.,j" i - . • �x � «, , � ' E. C' i Y . :n �3; . ,'�/..� , . � . �
. �.
i .. i .. ^ - � , r � ' . � . Y . .. .
� � r . . . �i � � . . �. . . «. _ ' ." . � . ' .i � ' : . .
0
Applicable City Ordinance Number 401 Section 5•8
Present Zoning of Property:
Present Use of Property:
Proposed Zoning of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
See attached sheet
See attached sheet
See attached sheet
See attached sheet
Number of people intended to live or work on premises: 1.7 x 80 = 136
I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional
material are true. •
, >
' / i
�n. ure of A pli.can
' � Richard M. Parranto
11/9/32
Date
'i1'I ,c9 la. - �3 -- ��
Received by (title)
NOT�: The following plans shall be drawn and attached to this application:
A. Applications involving a Variance shall submit the following plans:
Date Received Initial
l. Site Development Plan
2. Ditnension Plan
3. Landscape Plan
4. Grading Plan
B. Applications invol'ving a Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit or Subdivision
shall submit the following:
1. Sketch Plan ,
2. Abstractors Certificate
(If the subdivision involves cutting of existing parcel into two or more lots).
C. Applications involving a Wetlands Permit shall submit the following:
l. A full & adequate description of all phases of the operation &/or proposed
physical changes.
2. A topographic map of the area. Contour intervals shall be drawn at two (2)
foot intervals at a horizontal scale of 1" = 1,000' or larger.
3. A detailed site plan of the proposal showing proposed drainage, grading & landsc
4. A site design map showing the location of existing and future:man-made features
within the site and to a distance ot five hundred (500) feet surrounding the si1
r rr��� 1,�
4ctaber 19, 1982
D A T A
RE : MENDOTA HEIGFiTS CONDC}MINUM
• PR(7POSED DEVELOPMENT
Parce� "A"
Existin,g Zoning
98,280 s.�. �2.26 acres}
92,063 s.i. (2.12 acres)
Proposed zoning
190,343 s.�. {4.38 acres}
Parcel "B"
Existing zoning
Segment of larger parcel
Propased zoning
32,1OQ s.f,
Parcel "C"
Existing zoning
Segment of larger parcel
Praposed zoning
40,$55 s.f. (.94 acres)
S H E E T �
�
Li gh t
B-2 b
�New z
Resid
f am
B--2
.
Propased Development
As described on concept plan dated September 1, 1982.
residential
siness
ning distri.ct
ntial multi-
ly �
Publi� Street
ded cation
�
:
Parcel "A"
80 units candominums
Midrise/height vara.es �rom 4-6 storie� over enclosed pa
Site coverage by building. 35,50
Blacktap drive and parking area. 50,55
Landscapejogen recreational area. 104;:39
Parking, 8Q indoor/�20 exterioar Iot
Proposed density, 19 units%acre.
Parcel "8"
Develapment inta frantage .•road as per highway and Ciiy
Parcel "C" '
Naintain exa.sting business wi�h sufficient praperty �or'
oi 2000-3000 s.f. af building. Appropriate l.andscaping
frontage raad connection wa.11 be made at time oi re�id
development. .
king garage.
s.f.
s.f.
s. �.
requirements.
expansian
and new
ntial
29.�4 ��e s�� .�z�aa�t��z� �un��esc�. 5.5�� � `'� 4��-� �
.`��..'�
„,.�;; u��il�ll�lf�111l1�'�►.�c��ai����►�,,,�';#��--- '�� i��►��-- � ..� ,����1i�11�'�illli���.�;z�;3:�,���,iitt�,.`w
�
.-_ A�Y__��_,�—.1JYJ�..f�MM,►t!
s Y� % i7s '. .. _ A1sv :.6�sa.Q1.'
" f�tl�i%sl' ' _ '._ ./1AMUA� i4Y1ir
_���.�$'X�
[���a� o a �
�a���G11 �IbOC]�.1�f�
N �1
/-���.�-�
� ; � ' � � .
� ' � s � , � '—. �;-
; � .�____._ _. _._.---�_.___ ...____.--� �---- ----�------_- --�---� , �. _---- �`
M `_'�' "�1�
. �``•` \,
� I �� �
1 \ 1
���� �_ ,\
nov �wr++vv
�
l/i Ja�i` JA�!'.D►'N ` I' I �� �,`1 I
� '_ "-�. ` � I �
�� �' �� .� .� '� /� �
�1 y/ �" �t \ ��
'� j � - '�����-_-- ' ; ,� ."I ,
I.►r►s�w►7M ' y ���'�'^�P}iNT1J�lAM'df�litt- , /� / � ' ,,' ' \`�
.i I 1, � ` •,`
-�ZI— =i=— � -==wl =ye1� P�/. �, �� oN,,1 � ,�^ ,``1
\
'\ j 1 • ,`� 11 �
�� ` • I�U'O�l7 ,\`` �� �� �. ` ,�,+������.�.{-�.���... ,' .�, 1
�
� � I _ �..�r..v _ .. ' 1
` i� w � � / � *
'' `` `` "�rr.. � • ��. � � � �1 t� T'7�'f
-T-rbN7' \ �� :� � �'t�d! ' ���•
� 1 •.T•w - -. �� � .�..
I��, ,\,� � �Ni` �� f� - '_ �u� �
� � �� ; � �� � � �
I � 1 i� � � ^
� � � ,'I
i � '�� i
�_. �- ) � I � � � I � i� r'-=r
\ � ' i�� � � ' �I : T:I'�Z: �
; j �� ' •�� `' � - - � � �1
�' '���� �• � � "��'����"��' '''
���...�..�� '�'� ��""� ._ .
_.l ' `�
C,,.� (
< <
� � bww � '
- - � �' • i ',J�'iw.��v,�Ao ' � / ' ; .
�- �._• � 1
--J-�.� -- i� -- �
C'- ---- - ' "�: - ---- �,•_:: _:_ ; _-- -, %
�_ ---- _--------------- -
�
C
1 \� F
� � .-------.�. __ . ` --M�Y.7/a -�---•_ -_._. - -� �__ � ----- --- _...
. �
/rie�art 'c' � •
' _--'.____ - .7'DVAt71R�/.Z/' �
m "�
� '� � N•'' ���� 'w _� ..
� -- -=.� f-�, , ,. � 17 � - ��
� � � �
� �r� �i �` =__ -
/ I
%' -� , .
/ ' ^ ' .. _..
� ,-;` ;; �'� '� ;,
,.,�+ , ; „ •,,
�p , .,�„- :���; . ,,, ,� � � ,
� ,I ,wu i� i�� �i J
� `� r �I
� ^� �� /� �� �
� � ♦
�/ ' •�/',A i
�' i i � ; /Yl�t /esw�.w�ef tr
�9 '� .-' , ' � `. . 1 I
''� � '�
. :�.._ . i , ,�, ,
f ��/�� � - � i ' I
�; _,� l �
� � '
v � . ��---n" =-:.' '- --- ~ ' . i
y '� �- � �� /--� y (��.w� . ._. 1 w
tiF I �
i � '1� .� e»w,■w `/�� (�""'j � �......� — �-_-s��ar-----
.� � , , �
, ,.
:� �-' _ � -' � �
, , , ,.�, , , �
--- � • � � - ��:'---� w
T •� � ' I • �, ' y --� � }, � (f �, J' I . . . �,a7 -'— � ..
�� : �•
�/� •��� i � �i��� '. �. �� :� •� "(''� I
. �� � � � � _ �'(;i`>,� '..'_ ' ,,`,�� h--�`' �� �
ai Ai:1-'`� 1 � i/rd -i. _� ��� `�".�� ,' _ _�•�- ,�:.? .�\,� �\ 1 � M
� � `�_� � � �'� � � �i+,:•. �\��.- : %��_ �I 1� t�eci.i.rV.' .,�
� � : �� � � � �� .� = I ���`. � �.��.��_.._ �
; '•r �_ •i ' �����.�...��..
� � '�•�' ----�+-----
I' �� _.. . �� J
� "„�'o : ' , ` '
�.. . _
i
�
� Cc�DC��n.��[�UI�G,�
�.��-
. .��isww -- - - _..;�.��
s+.�r� nx�cv_===,�_ -sn % �s"�:
1+�nrrN�.+r+[�- ---- - -'��'r' � • •-
� et t:'t3.r s----r+in ra-pa+�
--lawrv�Y �= Nt+rttilttt�I�n►V�
��oaoc�oaao�
�a�o�a a�a���
, .a
� �� r6��q11'/J•��
r►F.r�. 't�:: •
, ,! -�"'�— i ...,• I
\
���•���`° '�"I
��'� .
_ , ...... ._., _ �
.�
� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�P-LANNING COMMISSION°
�
MINUTES
January 25, 1�98
----------i
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was ca:
by Chairperson Kruse at 8:04 P.M. The following members were presen.t;
Morson, Blesener, Butler and Stefani. Burke and Frank were excused.
were City Administrator Orvil Johnson and Planning Consultant Howard I
APPROVAL OF
MINUTES
CASE 82-24,
JOHNSON BROS.
(CCNDOR CORP.)
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT
�C_ASE 83-01, PARRANTO;
�-ZONING ORDINANCE""`"'�
=AMENDMENT«,��,_'x
C
led to order
Kruse,
Also present
ahlgren.
Minutes of the December lst meeting had been su mitted
previously. Stefani moved, seconded by Morson hat the
minutes be approved as submitted. Voting: all ayes.
Chairperson Kruse noted that the hearing for Jo nson Brothers
had been continued from the November meeting bu that staff
had been advised that the applicant has chosen o withdraw
his application, therefore Kruse noted that the hearin was
closed.
Mr. Dick Parranto was present to discuss his ap
noting that his proposed plan exceeds the City
in �ny respects, therefore he asked for an amen
the Zoning Ordinance. His intent is to constru
to six story multi-family highrise condominium
southeasterly corner of TH 110 and Lexington.
development suggests a density of 19 units per
Dahlgren noted that in most cities, a density o
per acre is acceptable. The density of the exi
family zone approximates 10 units per acre. Mr
also noted that most cities allow a three story
that a conditional use permit would be necessar
four to six stories in a new zoning district.
Dahlgren also updated the commission briefly on
Mendota Heights study.
lication,
rdinances
ment to
t a f our
n the
his
cre. Planner
15 units
ting multi-
Dahlgren
structure and
to allow
lanner
the "downtown"
Mr. Mark Finnemann, architect for the project, as also
present for the.discussion, which centered on t e project,
and not on the rezoning amendment.
After some discussion, Butler moved to recommen that staff
be requested to develop a new multi-residential zonin
district for a public hearing.
City Administrator Johnson note
considered.
Morson seconded the motion.
d that multi ple ses shou d
be
Blesener added a friendly amendment, suggesting �that "districts"
should.be included in the motion. Morson 'second d the motion.
Voting on amendment: 4 ayes, 1 nay, Stefani.
Voting on original motion: 4 ayes, 1 nay, Stef ni.
Planning Commission Minutes, January 25, 1983 Page Two
Several commission members expressed their opinions, with
Blesener wanting a general discussion on down-zoning and
mixed use. Morson noted that he did not think this site
should be a commer_cial:si.te_.,_,Chairperson Kruse stated that
staff will come back with a proposed zoning ordinance at thej
Feb.r_ua-r_y-m_,eeting-arid al"so�wi.th�some�typical ordinances fro��
other cities. �he Commission could take a look at these =�
�and probably set a p_ublic hearing on tN'is application=for�`
�the_Mar-chxmee=t-ing�There was some question as to whether-`
his should be�-done at a work meeting or at the end of the
February agenda.
Chairperson Kruse noted to the applicant that just because
he voted in favor of the motion tonight, that did not
necessarily mean that he would vote in favor of a zoning
ordinance amendment to allow this proposed project.
CASE 83-02, Mr. Lawrence Culligan was present to explain his request, stating
CULLIGAN, that he plans to develop nine lots on 7.3 acres on the north-
SUBDIVISION AND west corner of Glenhill Road and TH 110. These lots are in
CRITICAL AREA the Critical River Area corridor and will also need site plan
SITE PLAN REVIEW approval. Each of the lots exceeds the 15,000 square foot
lot minimum area and conforms to other development requirements
of the City. A sanitary sewer easement is planned to accommodate
Lots 1 and 2,
After further discussion, Butler moved, seconded by Stefani
� to set a public hearing for February 22nd to consider
preliminary plat approval and critical area site plan approval.
Voting: all ayes.
CASE 83-03, - Mr. and Mrs Herb Dalglish, 1054 Sibley Memorial Highway, were
DALGLISH, SUB- present to explain their application. Mr. Dalglish noted that
DIVISION they have five children at home and that their present home is
too small for the family. They are proposing to build a
larger home on their present property. He noted that there
are 60 feet between their property line and their neighbor's
property line. The existing lot has some slopes on it that
are unusable as yard space and one of the new lots will need
a variance to area and frontage, as it will contain only
13,300 square feet This land is also in the Critical River
Area corridor so when a new home is contructed on the proposed
new lot, it would have to undergo critical area approval.
Because this property is metes and bounds, the division of this
should be processed as a preliminary plat, rather than as a
lot division.
After a brief discussion, Butler moved, seconded by Morson, to
set a public hearing for preliminary plat approval for February
22nd. Voting: all ayes.
PRE-APPLICATION Mr. Bob Doody, a partner in the Diamond Company, and Mr. Bob
MEETING, ACKERMANN/ Ackermann were present to discuss their intentions to constru�
STRUB, PUD ON TH 13 a.complex af four buildings on TH 13, easterly of I-35E.
0
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January �0, 1983
7 4
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: James E. Danielson
� Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Parranto Request - New Residential Zoning District ,
Dick Parranto is proposing a new Mid-rise Condominium at Lexington Avenue
and Trunk Highway 110. Aspects to consider:
1. The density he proposes does not conform to existing Cit
Ordinance.
2. The heighth is in excess of present City Ordinance.
3. The site is less than the required 10 acres for a Planne Unit
Development.
4. The �City should complete a feasibility study to consider the im-
pact of this development on existing public utilities, s rface
water controls and streetsystem.
Should the Planning Commission want to proceed with this proposal the
guidelines for a new Zoning District should be prepared by the pl nner
and adopted. Then Mr. Parranto could make an application for rez ning
, of this land to that new category.
,
0
•. � .. ' + ,.. ,. �y ''�ul � t ^ �;ii � . '
_ . ,.iy . � ' .• .. iY;,_ , . • _
�� n 3 , . �t.'!' ..�.r��- � �' ' - - . ,. • _ r _ - t ' '
i�'� ,•�l. ,.(:s ♦ .. t,� .:.z _ ei.Y; r����.L�.i�i:'=�• ,�t� .. _ ,L��� .�C- � � _
.ti ".k: .r.,:x:` � . .. . - ''i_:�-y,+,,,. .. . �.�>�:r;;•'�?t;4 • •`2� 'v� , ' . .'.F��r - . , - - -
.�:i+y,�i". • ";" :,t� , x.:t+t..:n - _ u,�:i ,� r i,^ - '�s;'' :i` - - �'-�y` _
. � i k y,Yl✓ . :- _ - •�•- - '!` _ `>>_
=r 25 •�Jarivar .1983 -�:� - . :'�=::..r�� y ,;z � J
_�.< y �'�:,' •`.•,;;. ,e!;°' . -t+;`:;�. :,,�'" ':�'; •._:•.: '.'�' �..: �.�. �,��:,
'y - �:Y� - � -+j:, G'�':.. ��; �.Z.r`i�Lk .�;{ �.✓�_�' �I.'.�4�i4i+ v.f„L_.��`F! FJ.`v�f'•
, ,�'�?" , y i`t :+� ' .•x' ' _ �}:e. 't�'�k;; �. , �4! ,�,:���t,,. . � _ :.r��.�;.�: C�^e :lF�r�!`Y F _ "�S' r9', .
- j` ~'� •'�e � . ' Fa '.*�Y,.: _. 'Jr ,.�:. :. � . _ . �s,`" = �,w,
�',�"• � �a�:" a yf� •• •f•� y`� . '.{ ' :Y 3' 'f�x' .
_ ••%:S�J :'��` ^ - `T�.. Y `��' .f! ��.ti.�' .f..: .�,.. . `��'�#? _
i' ;�:;� PL��NNINGr REPORT; ":'�" . '.i -x.f ^.-r:;"s;'�:;'�:... ..',:. ,. :,��:: :'r!': ���. �
' . _ .' ,t�i�nw K�t��r�' . � ��C^:: �.�: �' _ ..,4. . .ti . xt.,�•s..p't.i�: ' .y.., �y .
' n � i3�. , n : ! i "- .•A�f�.. '�4. . " �./�' - . ' _ . 1' �£�• i^�_ c2 .X,��i.�• �. �
' � • , � r ' - ��� , ' ' _ ' •� t •�4' ' � . •• _ . _'lM.� � _ . �, . ' ' ;
,. ''` ' � CASE NUMBER: • _: ',,� � -, , ' . ' ,.. 83-01'.�' " • • ,- • ^ . '�t . - •.
.... ._ ' - t �, _ _ r . �.Y � �,�1 � . �y � ' ' . .r � ' ' " t» . . 1'.. `� `J '" `i". • .� . _
, ' • :.`�• • . .�� yy;f' , ' . ,
• ' _ - : � APPLICANT: � � � ' y . ' Richard M. Parranto • �� • • ' .
, . , . .. ; . ' , � ' � .. ,. '�'. ..:� . - . � .. �
. • .. - LOCATION: : • • - ` - " . - Southeasterly Corner of � Trunk' H' ghway..110
. � ' . _ " - . . ,-„ , - ., " • and Lexington� Avenue � (see�;sketc ) - . •
ACTION REQUESTED:� , ••
PLAATNING CONSIDERATIONS:
Adoption of tdew Mu1ti=Residenti 1-Zoning •
District ; ��
� � _
1. Mr. Parranto and his architect have visited with the Staff on two
prior to this application. Their intent is to construct a four t�
story multi-family highrise condominium on portions of the Tom Cu
property easterly and southerly of the furniture store, gasoline
and convenience store at the southeast corner of Lexington and Tr
Highway 110.
Attached are copies of a preliminary site plan, building plan, pe
existing site plan, and a data sheet outlining the scope of the p.
development of the land. This information is supplied by the app
for the purpose of demonstrating the intent and need for the new
district. The design of the proposed development, of course, is
subject of the approval process at this stage. The question at t'
is whether or not the City is desirous of having a zoning distric
accommodate such a proposal. If such a district is amended to th
Ordinance, the applicant would then presumably apply for developm
under the terms of that district. �� .:"
2, The City already has a multi-family residential district. The de
, varies according-to a formula relating to the type and scope of.
� ment. � A copy:of the provisions of that district are attached foY
information.- � -
The derisity of the existing multi-family zone approximates 10 uni
The development proposed suggests a density of 19 units per acre.
difference between the densities is substantial enough so as to n
to handle the proposed deve],opment utilizing the existing provisi
Zoning District with a variance to the density. You will recall
the Mcl�ulty people proposed to develop a townhouse project in an
zoned to require 40,000 square feet per unit that the Council pro
have the new zoning district adopted providing for the 30,000 squ
per unit required in that project. That change represented a 50
increase in density (decrease in the amount of land area required
The proposed density represents almost a 100 percent increase in
so it would seem the adoption of a new district would be more ap
than attempting to process a variance to this degree.
six
ley
tation,
'_spective,
-oposed
_icant
;oning
iot the
iis point
: that would
: Zoning
:nt approval
is i ty
ievelop��_.
>yaur '`� ���4'�• ':�.
m
per acre.
The
attempt
s of the
at when
osed to
re feet
erc ent
per unit).
ensity
opriate
CASE NUMBER: 83-01
APPLICANT: Richard M. Parranto . -
DATE: 25 January 1983 Page 2
3. Typical multi-family �nes accommodating condominiums in the metropolitan
and suburban area approximate 15 units per acre. The City of Roseville
allows approximately 17 units per acre, Saint Louis Park allows
approximately 20 units per acre, the City of Hopkins allows up to 40 units
per acre. Higher densities such as 19 units per acre cannot be reasonably
accommodated on the land unless the structures approximating about five
stories in height are utilized.
4. The basic question is whether the City desires such higher structures,
and the consequent higher densities within the community. We suggest that
the Planning Commission discuss this issue at the meeting in January, offering
direction to the applicant�and the Staff relating to this policy question. .
Should the Planning Commission and Council de'sire us to do so, we shall
prepare an appropriate zoning district as an amendment to the Zoning
Ordinance as was done to accommodate the McNulty townhouse project in
the southeast corner of the City.
5. In consideration of the appropriateness of this step, we suggest that a
dialogue with the applicants regarding their marketing and development
strategy would be helpful. It should be borne in mind that the adoption of
such a district will make its provisions applicable to other areas in the
City. Such use of a new zoning district would, of course, have to be
preceeded by an application for rezoning, and approval of development plans.
Approval of this zoning would not necessarily imply approval on another
site. The point is that a new zoning district should not be adopted to
serve a single site, but should be appropriate for possible application to
other areas.
6. In general, the construction of higher density, highrise structures enhances
the tax base. This is particularly true if units are designed for the
accommodation of empty-nesters and others constituting a small family size.
The tax assets at the municipal level for commercial and industrial
development is shared with other communities through the Fiscal Disparities
Law applicable to our Metropolitan Area. Residential units are not subject
to the provisions of this tax sharing revenue method. It may also be true
that the concentration of higher density residential units in the vicinity
of "Downtown Mendota Heights" near the intersection of Trunk Highway 110
and 149 may be appropriate.
, . � ( ,r r,
•�,� ,I°'!r+ft�. � " �I l�l�! I i !_M�"t�].%—•-1 i � 'M �
.; .,
� _ •ARi[ �v Nu ._�
/r� '� '\ ±t ; ! ' r^ � � • ��._ _ - - •" z'
,' �.. . � �� • � /r� � ��i w� ` �;, 1
— _."-T f �� : �, w ,.J � ; l � ~
---- �� J / � w
t � M � �l ` �\ /"1i , f � � ; t I � , ; , „�y
• /N � t
' '.. It ' �' � • e.�wy � • " i �u � ` Z �
' �-s �� ct � . - � - , '' � t /! �
_ . .
j � f
� .� ' • . - ' '`� w � i .
� , i . 1 � �,r
—: i ,;� o � ,� ` .' i ��
• �, i �U _�' � ..
' � � • " � f � Qj,y �u i �%
r[�ooT� lL�YtM1AR� � j �
��. � fCN00�, tn+�t,C� � �� "` sSU .�{, i
. . 'i � � �_ /� %+ �: / � � _
— • i �
� ..� . �-. � "+ 1 sT tric« (^� � ''"' t � ,e
�...
.._. I � ' � � 1 ' � • � /� ' � ��
a • ' f • ; � � \ � t . `t y',
• ♦ • i r��owKa �• t / GV1C 1 ` �' / ! • � � `
I'`J / '� � � ' !
. � �' J , f � � � � � -
� • �/
' j � SI'TE AF / ' ! • �/ A�t t
I / r� 7' � � I • • . . 1
,.-_ �'' F ' } �, i .7�1�: �, j � ,'
• E � � � � '.� � � : ' � ,. , i�,, I }`,! • � . � � '�
i•L..: � , 4
�� �irw�..,.�5;•'♦ �f..,, y ! ��//�� �i���� _._��J� MSs i �
`„ � '�' / �
;:'= � % _ -+^-_ ", .._ �._.._' __.— _ _ �.? C'___y � _ _
= ����;�---- M��>;!�t�' ��N � j�ru;�` a. �.}r/� f y�� - — - ---- --i� G W A Y ;
S 1� �' �%"' t ';d,cl-1i�I�ll � � �� � i( �i,
:�' �i �� �I� �n ,: , 1 �j:
1 l
'`� ,� � �` Y rtoEL� E, -1' `\� +••!�/ irtEIYOANOTA GOl COE.iRSE 8. C4UNTRY ClU
SU�jeCt �_ ��. ��• _ . �`��, :��" i. �
: � ` / �� � t PR VkT£ 1 �
� �.
Property� ' : � � {� _
i � "} • • ' �': / : f
� � � ,. ! � t:
I T' . _ �• ' � /,�i:' �s :i
/ '� � '_
O /,, VQOI'..' y" • t'� _ �,1 �^ !/� _,_ - �
• . ;• p� r �' �
I J'I' • p •
.�`� ' � '.�' • Ip %� ! �I ..
'r.' ' F. ; tii 1� r ` <•c'
. • � • . � {dj. .. ,y�-.;5� ._r � 4 i.
\ ��- �``?,.' • , t i ! � �{f} � `��i, . , . n
� r Jj — l 0� � �..
7 1 \�,/,,,•,�^ •M .+� � � t {:. ,' ! _ _�. 7 s� M
r ` T�
� �� • i � �` �f • /r � = - �
� ' �;
. r ! • r _ '-a = ' f
,, , a N �1 __ - . . � � � - _ . -,
\� � J„j� 1'� • r�• � _-_ _ _ - � $
�,%� .j� il . � � � .' ._ T� .� '4-� � ^ _ i .z
.�
I R ���C�,I t1 N ' � , + • • • • i �'• � , i_ � ' - i
C• • • _�J �
; i �� � \ � �r� �_ _ _ = . �
\ � �fi `. � �� __ _ i �rwew
f * i + � �'{' �� �_ ( R�Tti 'O'YlR
.,� • ., �. .t 1__ �. _.. _,_ . _,_..t .�,..rt..�.
- 4r _ �'� t VM�� ' ' �^�-�,-,'��- T_ _ - � _ . T`- _
� % �\.�.✓�/ St---. � _'._ � �, r �r • �^ � - _ � �.._��� �
!
� r.,;,., - � ^ �
�.t E / £ R Y �f' � }-=;---+ E : �� , 3 • � \ ' � -:y,� .,�
;� z» •
� L...�--_ _`- `'` -"`a.:'"� --- wao�1="'L" � � ' - � r " - _.
.: .�: �
�� '` �. ._ _ ..- �E. = (
�� �.�: . , � ` 'F �- �
�., ��` � � ' • r� "�'+_" s � _ . _ '
• �- � � �.._a, � ,_�„ ti � -
•� !
` r .� z " . . �'` � t ( • ` � + �� i' � I / ' +
i ti� �i z •• !+'� R6iQR3 ( j . � . • . . �
/ �"' 1� _ ry :�� �: lAK£ 1 ' ( � - _ � ! •�
� L ! ��` � ' � , ; j�r� PARx i � � I = _ , _ ^ �.,` - , ` �
�� _ ` _ � i �: . ��� _� . . E.;. .i
. �`• � • 4 { yl �'ti� - - ' . , r
\ � �� \, � Jt 'r� } �� � _ _ _\J_-.,� r - _ -- t r�
J�-_ � . — �
� :' 't� •- �_ '_ � _. ' U � • OR v r . . -
� � • — _ _' � � . �. '�
!G - �J'---- " � _ _ ^ �--1� S ! . - t "_ . . il�� • � 1+.�
�.( ,y —�-+,-- -
� gt ! ' r_ > >
(! ` _= 1 Cr�SE NUI�BER: 83-d1 f t
r-• ,� `— /
_ APPLICANT: Richard Parranta �
� _` _ ACTION: Adopt,ion of a Ne �lulti-
' � r - �� _ � Residential Dist ict
. ! � i� �-- , _ !
. : i µ � �- _ - -' - -==..�1 ' � i r M -.• i � , �
�J'� �. � � "7 f7� �� :"''-r�� S�r_•ti . .rw. ��� � � � ���� � t! '� � � � j'
. I . . � _ . r.,. �
!. %�
SECTION 10. "R-3" MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
10.1 Permitted Uses
� Within the "R-3", Multiple Family Residential District,
no structure or land shall be.-used except for one or more
• of the following uses. All applications for building
permit within the "R-3" District shall be submitted for
City Council approval prior to issuance.
10.1 (1) Dwelling structures of two (2) or more units.
10.1(2) Public parks and playgr�unds.
10.1(3) Those uses listed and as regulated under Sections 7.1�(3),
7.1(4), and 7.1(5).
10.2. Conditional Uses
Within the "R-3" District, no structure or land shall be used
for the following uses except by conditional use permit.
10.2(1) Single family residence.
10.2(2) Private clubs and lodges which are not operated for profit.
10.2(3) Fraternity and sorority houses.
10.2(4) Private schools, universities and colleges.
10.2(5) Private swimming pools intended for and used solely by the
occupants of the property on which it is located and their
guests, provided: (a) the water surface of said pool is
located not less than fifty (50) feet from any lot line; (b)
that the pump and filter installed be not less than forty
(40) feet from any lot line; and (c) that the pool area be
so fenced as to prevent uncontrolled access from the street
or from adjacent property.
10.2(6) Those uses listed and as regulated in Section 7.2
10.3 Permitted Accessory Uses
Within the R-3 District, the f ollowing uses shall be
permitted accessory uses.
10.3(1) Any accessory use permitted in Section 7.3 of this Ordinance
and as regula_ted therein but subject to such further restric-
tions and regulations as applicable and specified herein.
10.4 Lot and Building Area and Building Heiqht Re uirements and
Limitations
10.4(1) No limit shall be placed on the height of buildings in the
R-3 District.
(401) 48
.;
10.4(2) The followinq minimum•yard requirements shall be ob erved:.
10.4 (2) a Front yard af at Ieast fifty f 50`) feet plus one (1) foot
per each one (1) foot of building height over seven y-five
. (75 ) feet. � - - " - �
10.4 (2)b Side and rear yards of at least forty (n�l.�feet plu one-half
(1/2) foot per one (1) foot of building height over seventy-five
� (75) feet. .
10:4(2)c No principal building housing more than two (2) dwe ling
units, shall be less than fifty (50) feet from any ther
such building. .
10.4(2)d Minimum lot width shall be one hundred fifty (150) �Eeet.
10.4(2)e No lot shall be developed separately if its area is less
than twenty thousand (20,000) square feet. Lots not served
by a public sewerage system shall have a minimum lo area
of thirty thousand(30,000) square feet or ten thous nd (10,000)
square feet of lot area per dwelling unit, whicheve is qreater.
10.4(3) The followinq per unit minimum floor area requireme�ts shall
be observed: ,
Efficiency Units Not Permitted
One Bedroom Units 750 square feet
Two Bedroom Units 800 square feet.
t Three or More Bedroom Units 1,000 square feet
10.4(4) The followinq minimum lot area per dwelling unit re�{uirements
shall be observed: �
1 Story
2 Story
3 Story or More
1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bed�joom �
5,050 sq. ft 6,000 sq.ft 6,6 0 sq.ft.
4,400 " " 5,220 " " 5,770 " "
4,080 " " 4,840 " " 5,3 0 " "
10.4(5) The total minimum lot area requirements herein may be decreased
by 300 square feet for each parkinq space that is rovided under
a multiple family building. �
10.5 Off-Street Parkinq Requirements
In addition to the applicable provisions of Sectio 18 of this
Ordinance, the followinq minimum parkinq space and parking
lot requirements shall apply in the R-3 District.
10.5(1) A minimum of two and one-half (2 1/2) parking spac s shall
be provided for each dwelling unit, one of which s all be �
enclosed. Parking spaces not enclosed shall have minimum
width of ten (10) feet and twenty (20) feet in len th.
Al1 enclosed parking spaces shall be designed with sufficient
access area to allow temporary parking of vehicles on the
access way without interfering with access to othe required
parking spaces.
(40�1) 49
10.5(2) Parking lots or ather unenclosed parking snaces shall
least forty (40j feet from any �ublic s�ree�. Parking
-���w•�•s-ha1°1'""b�e�at"�l'`ea's�`"'ten (10'J'""'feet" from 'ariy""p�'irici,�,aa'l�''i�se
ing�unles`s the parking area is enclosed as an 3.ntegral
part af such building. • " � , -
be a�
areas
build-
10.5(3} The minimu� width of any driveway shall�be �wenty-four (24)
feet. Tiie minimum distance between curbs o� drzveways at
the right--of-way line shall be twenty (20) feet» Any aisle-
� providing access to parallel row� of spaces shall have a.
ma.nimuzn wa.dth of twenty-faur { 2 4) f eet .
1Q.5{4} No driveways shall�be �ess than fif�y (SO} fPet from any
stree� intersection. .
1p,5{5} Minimum driveway angle from a two-way access street shali be
sixty (60) degrees; �'rom a one-way street i� shall k�e not
less �han thirty {30} degree�.
10.5{6) All parking areas and driveways shall be surfac�d and curbed
with either cement, bituminous'surfacing or compar.abl,e
material to provi.de a hard aIl-weather surface and �a
delineate the edges of al1 p�arking areas and driveways.
Bumper staps af siinilar material sha11 be provided for. each
parking space.
I0.5(7) Parking area� which ser_ve buildinqs housing three {3} or more
dwelling units which are contiguous to ar acros� a stre�t
from single or twa family uni.ts shall be screened with a
four (4) �oot wall, of masonry or wood. 5uch wall shall be
at least eight-f ive ( 85 ) pe.rcent opaqale .
10.6 Architectural Controls
Any buildings which will contain dwelling units for twa or
maxe �ami3.ies in the R-3 District shall be canstructed only
in conformance to building and site plans certi�ied by a'.
registered architect. The site plan may he prepared by a
professional site planner but a registered architec�. must
certify that he has persa,nally reviewed the site and designed
the proposed buildings in"accordance with the site plan, the
terrain and neighboring conditions. No building per.mit wi1.l
be issued when these canditians are appl.icable until
appropria�.e certi�icates'and plans shall be submitted to
indicate the�following:
10.6(1) Camplete details of the pxoposed site development, including
location af buitdings, driveways, parking spaces, dimensions
of the lot, lot area and yard dimensa.ons.
10.6(2) Complete landscaping plans includxng species and size af
trees and shrubs praposed. A bond in an amount not ta
exceed one and on�:-half (lZ) times the cost of land�caping
and screeninq shal.l be required ta guarantee the placement
thereof a� se� forth in said plans.
(40].) 50
10.6(3) Co.mplete_�lans for proposed sidewalks to_servic�
.recreation"and service areas�_wi�hin.the,propose�
. i' . . � ��' _ v , � ':. ' , . .
10. 6(4) �{ Complete .plans for -storm water.`drainage system ;
.�' -to drain and dispose of'all"surface water accum�
� �,� : within � the area . � : . , : � , �
10.6(5) Compl.ete structural, electr_ical and mechanical �
the proposed buildings.,
10.6(6) Complete plans and specif ications for exterior �
proposed for all principal and accessory�buildi�
10.7 ' Structural, Electrical and Mechanical Requireme�
parking,�
development.
- - , "�,,`• .. :
fficient '�
ations ��
•. ; � `. .
lans for
11 f inishes
s.
ts
In addition to other applicable controls and re ulations
specified in this Ordinance and the building co e of the City,
all principal use buildings in the R-3 District shall con-
form to the-following requirements:
10.7(1) All mechani.cal and electrical systems shall be esigned
and certified by a registered engineer.
10.7(2) Plans for any multiple family dwelling of more han two
floors shall have a st.ructural system designed nd certified
by a registered structural engineer.
10.7(3) Multiple family buildings with dwelling units o more than
�� three (3) floors shall be of Type I or Type II onstruction
as defined in the latest edition of the PZinneso a State
Building Code.
10.7(4) All multiple dwe].lings shall be designed and co striictPd
with windows that are easil.y opened from the in ide for
emergency exit.. _
10.7(5) In new construction, no air conditioning unit s all protrude
from any exterior wall unless it is designed to appear as an
integral part of such wall.
10.7(6) Al1 living space shall be above the average grac�e of the
structure. �
10.7(7) R minimum of fifty (50) square feet of storage pace shall
be provided for each dwelling un.it within any m ltinle
family building, exclusive of storage space nor ally pro-
vided within each dwelling unit. There shall b no exterior
storaqe of debris or garbage and no open-air la ndry drying
shall be permitted.
10.7 (8)
Storage of flammable materials shall not be all wed in any
structure containing living quarters unless sto ed in a
fireProof room or container.
� c4o�� sl
;
10.7(9) In all buildinqs housing two or more dwelling units the
followinq requirements relating to acoustical controls
shall apply: . �
10.7(9)a All doors�providing access to individual dwelling units
shall be not less than one and three quarters (1 3/4) inch
�solid core and equipped with gaskets or closing plates.
10.7(9)b All plumbinq servinq each unit shall be separated from other
units by a room, closet, corridor or sound barrier and
shall be so const'ructed so as to have a loss in sound
transmission of not less than fifty (50) decibels.
10.7(9)c Party partitions and floor systems shall be of a type
sufficient to accomplish a loss in sound transmission of not
less than fifty (50� decibels determine�d by averaging the
. loss of frequencies of 125, 250, 350, 500, 700, 1000, 2000,
and 4000 cycles. Corridor partitions shall be capable of
accomplishing a loss in sound transmission of not less than
forty-five (45) decibels similarly determined.
10.7(10) All multiple dwelling buildings shall be designed and
constructed to have the equivalent of a front on each
exterior surface. All accessory or ancillary buildings
including qaraqes shall be desiqned and constructed with
facing materials of the same quality as those used in the
principal use building.
�:JN' ..
(401) 52
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
22 February 1983
83-01
Richard M. Parranto
Southeasterly Corner of
110 and Lexington Avenue
Adoption of New t9ulti-
Zoning District
Highway
ial
1. Attached is a copy of the report prepared for last month's Planni g
Commission meeting. °You may wish to review that text, and the ac ompanying
drawings�prior to continuing with this report.
2. As requested by the Planning Commission, we have conduct�d resear h relating
to the broader question of multi-family residential densities (n er of
units per acrej used by other communities in the Metropolitan Are . The
results of this research indicate that in general higher densitie than
that which are currently allowed in the Mendota Heights Ordi.nance are in
common practice. The results of this research follows in this re ort.
3. We have also included two examples of multi-family zoning distric s from
the Cities of Bloomington and Edina which are helpful illustratio s of how
higher density projects have been handled in those cities. These are
illustrated in the attached Appendices A and B. �
4. At the end of t�his report there is a discussion of the various el ments
of a suggested.new zoning district, followed by a draft text of su h a
district for your consideration. Following that is an analysis o the potential
impact of the zoning district to the Parranto proposal.
DISCUSSION OF R-3A ZONING DISTRICT:
�:
In May 1977 the Metropolitan Council and the Association of Metropoli
Municipalities conducted a survey of zoning ordinances from 81 metropo
municipalities (see Figure 1). One aspect of that survey was the req
for high density multiple residential zoning districts in the surveye
municipalities. The range of maximum permitted density varied.greatl
the communities surveyed. Central cities such as Minneapolis permit �
as great as 145 units per acre, while outlying communities limit thei
density zones from five to ten units per acre. The following table i
the range of permitted densities found among the communities surveyed
itan
among
nsities
highest
ustrates
Figure 1.
COMMUNITIES SURVEYED
�-----�� -
' I A7[�TOMM
I MOLITWOOD I W�TERTOWN
�
�
I��++-� �[R ---
M[N G[tM�M► I
� C�MOEN I WACONI� LAItETONN �
I FACOMIA
� CARVIER CO.
' --- —}"-----f------
I f� �OUNG I Cf
L,J�M[IIICA �j
NORMOOD� � �J I
I COLOGMF� OAMLGflEN
� YOUNG �MERIC� I BENTON �
� I
��.�.� __ � �
--f--- -t----
� I S�N �RAHCISCO
MAryCOCM1
�----.; l�`
�-----
1 IT.IIIRMCII
NE I HELENf I ^C^ ^^R^c' '
CEDAR ��NE I EI
I I M[� MAIIR[7
I I I
M[ �IIAGU[I LI(0
—1--�-1— - —1----�---
�
MIlES 5 10 15 20 25 � CREI
�
I S�tING ���K 9 VICTOIIIA 17 IALCON M[IGMTI 25 G[Y LAK[
2 O�OMO 10 �O��IMfDALL lE M[IIDOTA 26 �I�CMMOOD
3 YIMF[TONR� �[�LM ll f1�IMG LAK[ IA�R 19 LIl1D1L[ 27 WMITE tlE�fl
� TOXRR ��Y li U{.GOYi 20 GXEY CLOUD 2� �ATIORT
S!xC[L31011 13 NIlLTO� 21 IAND�FLL 29 WILLLIIMI[
6 G�LINWOOD 1� COLUM�IA M[IGMT{ 22 OLllW00D 30 O�K ��IIK NCIGNTI
I 1YOODLAXD 13 iT �NTMOMT 23 �IX[ f�I11MCt ]� �AK[L�XU fNOf[f
B M(OICIM[ LAK[ 16 LAIID[�OAL[ 2l M�MTOM[DI 32 {T ��RT'� �OIMT
� , ,�..���,,
EMPIRE I ❑ I MRASMAN I I
i0M � V[IIYILLI011 I I
� � � 1
-----�------�------ —J
I 1 I �-
� • � � �ML� T�I[R ^1 '
�I X�M� OX � 1 r �
I CASTLE ROCR U
� '
�
��---�-- � i
i ��wATERFOPO
� .� � SC107• �
_' J__�
AN KA County Boundary
o.o�o Municipal Boundary
c•"`-`"—__ Township Boundary
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
83-01
Richard M. Parranto
22 February 1983
P�IAXIMUM DENSITY FOR MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING
10 units/acre
15 units/acre
20 units/acre
30 units/acre
40 units/acre
50 units/acre
145 units/acre
Variable*
No multi-family in community
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
6
8
21
16
4
4
5
12
PERCENT
7.4�
9.9�
25.9�
19.8�
4.9$
4.9$
6.2$
14.8�
6.2�
TOTAL 81 ]:00.0�
* Many of these communities gave the density figure
listed in its Zoning Profile but also indicated that
densities could be higher due to the size of the
development or other factors.
Page 2
Due to the variety of inethods used in determining maximum densities pe itted,
it is sometime difficult to convert the figures to numbers which are c mparable.
It appears, however, that the average density of communities surved is'near 20
units per acre.'
Figure 2 illustrates the maximum units permitted by community. The ma shows
clearly that communities closer to the Twin Cities Central Business Di 'tricts
generally permit higher densities than outlying communities. Proximit to
employment and service centers is a key element in determining which eas are
most suitable for high density residential development. Other factors such
as sewer capacity and transportation systems also affect the viability of
potential developments. As Figure 2 also indicates, all communities a jacent
to Mendota Heights with the exception of Sunfish Lake permit densities greater
than Mendota Heights.
City of Saint Paul
City of Inver Grove Heights
City of Eagan
City of West Saint Paul
City of Mendota Heights
("R-3" District)
i
73.0 units/acre
43.5 units/acre
23.0 units/acre
14.5 units/acre
10.0 units/acre
Figure 2
MULTI-FAMILY,
MAXIMUM UNITS PER ACRE
5 - 12'/z
� 14Yz-20
� 21 - 31
� 36 or more
�-----
T--
, �T.,.,M���
�
, I
IBUpNS i OAMGROVE
I I
1 '
H�SS�N O�t70M
C
��
G�L[MII[LD COIICOIIAM
OCKiO�D HENN
IQL011[TTO
� IMD[f[NO[X[� M[DIM�
IM��L[ IL�IM
r----T� , - �
I I �7[�TOMN
( MOLLrWOOD I W�TENTOwN
�
�
�_�—_� �t[R
M[M GL�M�Mf I --
_ I 9
� L�MDEN I WALOfiI� L�KETONN
I MACONIA
L---- � CARVIER CO. —
1 _�_____L____CN�SK�
�
f� 70UNG �
I (JAM[�IC� �� ����VI
MD�MOOD� �
DAMLGREN
�ONO
JACKSON
y ':;? Tj�.:'•'.:.k:
�� �LTYOYTN.���
.'�' } t'�
•
MIMX[TOMK�I
� ==.�'y�v�,I �
[[►N�V[M
t'. j'.r�j'.
(CLM ��AI�IL
CTN[L-- ---1
�
LINWOOD I
�.fT .�.H« ,
_�_—�
1
CO. COLUMBUS
M�YL�R[
�
LIMO LAK[S
�. • • q �C[NTl
,'�► fNC �
;•1k �#�;:
�; '
TO �SR� CIRCI[ �IN[i
� t.y
�i� "o4Mis fNORcwcw =7
•K• MO�TN
t:�� OAKf wNi
{
0�3 25
1• _ ...
HEw SC�NDi�
I M�Y
NUGO
WASHINGTON CO.
— � ----
�� I STIILW�TEN
GR�NT I �
`�R� BAYTOWN
[LYO� �--'
wEST
I�KEUNO
fr. uax �c
AlT011
DENMl�RK
� I COIOGN '-1 � t:-`.i• !l�•
1
y � YOUNG �NERIC� I BENTON I �— '; � 1V►1t MAIk[1 � HININGER ��t,
i I I �- lOU15VILlE .Fi' 1 . :x `,'A . 1
. L�.�.� � ---- � : ` o. ---�— �
_� I SAN fRAHC�5C0 I � I
� VERMI�L ION
` M�NCOCF I I I I I IRAVEHNA�
� L_�_�� �5�NDCREEN I SGRINGL�KE I CREOIi EMVIRE I a I MARSNAry I
, � I RIVER TOM � YERMILLION I I I
I'
� SCOTT CO. � I I I I1
: ST.L�WNENCEI JO�DAM I -- �— ____��__�__L----- J
: —_—+___T_ — I � � �_
i �[LL[ �LAlll[
I I I
r ' I NE'M MARKET I � �M[� T�I[�
BL�1(EIET BELLE FL��NE i HELENA � CED�R L�RE i ' EUREMA I L�STIE ROLI( I M�M�TON I � �
I Mlll MA�I([T I I � I MlL�ucl
I M�MiTON I DOUGLAS
1 I
` I �
I MI �II�GY[I I LRO �: I I '
���������_�1���1_��'1i_—__�__ ���pOLfMLPM a/.iE
-�---
�%J � i I
//�Y( MILES 5 10 IS 20 25 I CREENVI.LE �w�iERFORD
L/ L/
' � SLIOT� �
�-- —1—J—'�
i f��ING ��IIK 9 YICTORI• 17 I�LCOM HLIGNTf i5 G[M L�KI
2 O�OMO 10 �O��IMSDIILL lE MlXDOTA 26 �IIICN1�000 ANpKA ``O11n� Bounda
j MIMMC70NRA �L�CM 11 fI�IMG I�KL �A�R 19 LIL1'D�LC 2) WM`TE BE4R Y rY
f TOIIN� �F1 I7 U f GOVT 20 GREY CIOUD 3� ��TIO�T OROMO Munici al Bounda
5[1ICLlf10� 13 NILLT01 21 LAFOIAIL 29 MILL[RNI[ P rY
6 GII[LXw00D 1� COIYM�I� N[IGNT3 22 D[LLWOOD 30 O�R IA�k N[IGNTf •+�'JEN _T�Wn$h�ft Boundar
7 MOODL�XG 13 !T •11TXOXP 23 �IM[ fI111NG1 31 L�KCL�NO fNO�[t Y Y
0 MCDICIN[ l�Rl 16 L�UOLIIDAL[ i� M�NTO�LGI 32 fT MA�f'f t0111T
CASE NUAIBER: 83-01
APPLICANT: Richard M. Parranto
DATE: 22 February 1983
A list of 18 other metropolitan communities having densities greater i
units per acre is also included for your review. The name of the cit}
formula for calculating minimum lot size, and maximum permitted densit
included. Since some communities allow bonus density when special cor
are met, we have noted which communities offer bonuses.
Proposed R-3A Zoning District
Based on our research and experience with high density residential de
we have prepared a draft ordinance for the Planning Commission and Ci
Council`s review. This draft ordinance includes provisions which wou
densities greater than presently allowed under the existing R-3 Distr
proposed R-3A Zoning District is patterned similar to the R-3 Distric
the base densities are modified by density deductions and additions b
upon specific aspects of the individual proposal. Yard requirements,
architectural controls, and structur�l, electrical, and mechanical re
of the R-3A District are the same as•those presently required in the
District. The following is a summary of the additional or different
ments of the proposed R-3A District.
Page 3
n 20
the
is
tions
lopments
allow
t. The
in that
ed
irements
3
Permitted Uses. The new R-3A District is intended for projects wi h
32 or more units and more than tHree stories in height. Projects f
smaller size should be developed under the existing R-3 District.
Permitted Accessory Uses. In addition to the normal accessory us
such as parking, driveways, loading, etc. we have added limited
commercial uses to be allowed at �the first floor level. The scop
layout of such uses would be controlled by the Planned Unit Devel�
process which will be required in every case. It is conceivable
such a combination of limited commercial and multi-family residen
could be adaptable to possible sites in�the "Downtown Mendota Hei
area (intersection of Trunk Highway 110 and 149).
Lot Area. The proposed minimum lot size i� 80,000 square feet. F
of a smaller size are more suitable in the R-3 District. The forn
for determining required lot area�is based upon 2,500 square feet
approximately 17.5 units per acre. This base density is further n
by the following:
l. Underground Parking. Parking underground improves site
efficiency. A bonus of 300 square feet per underground
stall is proposed. This is similar to the R-3 District.
2. Building Height. As buildings become taller, building
site coverage decreases and site efficiency improves.
An allowance of 200 square feet per unit is provided
for all units ahove the fourth floor.
and
ment
at •
a 1 �'
ts" �
jects
unit,
fi�d
CASE NUMBER: 83-01
APPLICANT: Richard M. Parranto
DATE: 22 February 1983 Page 4
3. Building Coverage. If building coverage is significantly
reduced (to 10� or less), a bonus of 250 square feet per
unit is proposed. .
4. Number of Bedrooms. For each bedroom per unit more than
two, an additional 500 square feet per unit is proposed.
As an example, if a ten story structure with ten units per floor was
proposed and one underground parking space per unit were provided and the
building coverage was less than 10�, a maximum density of 24 units per
acre could be permitted under the Ordinance.
Useable Lot Area Amendment. While minimum lot size does directly relate
to the amount of green space ,on a proposed lot, it does not necessarily
mean that the space is both useable or accessible by residents as outdoor
recreation space. This amendment would assure that a minimum of useable
outdoor space would be provided. •
Special Requirements. �ue to the traffic generated by high density
developments, this provision assures that good and safe access will be
provided by any proposed future projects.,
Parking Require�nents. The total required parking spaces proposed is
similar to the R-3 District. The only difference is that in the R-3A
District, one underground parking space per unit will be required. This
greatly discourages the use of garages to fulfill parking requirements.
This also further reduces building site coverage and•ensures that more
green space will be provided.
,
ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED R-3A DISTRICT AS IT WOULD AFFECT THE PROPOSAL OF
RICHARD PARRANTO:
l. As the Planning Commission will recall on 25 January 1983, Richard Parranto
requested that the Commission consider a new zoning district to permit
higher residential density requirements. The following is an analysis
�:
showing how the density`proposed by Mr. Parranto's proposal would be
affected by the R-3A District.
CASE NUMBER: 83-01
APPLICANT: Richard M. Parranto
pATE: 22 February 1983
NUMBER OF UNITS
FLOOR NUMBER PROPOSED
1 13
2 18
3 18
4 18
5 9
6 4 �
TOTAL UNITS: 80
TOTAL PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE = 18�
2. Based upon 80 proposed units, the base�required lat area is 200,i
feet. Additions and deductions to this base are as follows:
- 80 underground parking spaces at 300 '
square feet per parking�space = 24,000 squarE
- 13 units above four stories at 200
Page 5
square
feet
square feet per unit = 2,600 square feet
- No three bedroom units proposed = 0 square feet
- Building coverage in excess of 10� = 0 s are feet
- TOTAL NET DEDUCTIONS ' = 26,600 square feet
- TOTAL REQUIRED LOT AREA '
(200,000 s.f. - 26,600 s.f.') = 173,400 square feet
- TOTAL LOT AREA PROPOSED = 190,342 square feet
Therefore, the proposed submission by Mr. Parranto would fulfill i�he
density requirements of the proposed R-3A District. I
10A.1
10A.1(1)
10A.1 (2)
lOA.l (3)
10A.2
10A.3
"R-3A" MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Pe�nitted Uses
Within the R-3A Multiple Family Residential District, no structure
or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses.
Al1 applications for building permit within the R-3A District shall
be submitted for City Council approval prior to issuance.
Dwelling structures of 32 or more units and at least 4 stories
in height, and as specified in Section 10A.5.
Public parks and playgrounds..
Those uses listed as regulated under Section 7.1(3), 7.1(4), and
7,I(5). (Same as R-3 Zone.)
Conditional Uses
Those uses listed as regulated under Sections 10.2 and 7.2.
(Same as R-3 Zone.) • •
Accessory Uses
10A.3(1) Any accessory use permitted in Section 7.3 of �his Ordinance and
as regulated therein but subject to such further restrictions and
regulations as applicable and specified herein.
10A.3(2) Shops, restaurants, offices, and club or lodge rooms. Accessory
uses shall be reviewed as part of a PUD as listed and regulated
in Section 19 of this Ordinance.
10A.3(3) In addition to responsibilities listed in Section 19,2(3) the
Planning Commission shall determine the following:
10A.3(3a) The type and square footage of accessory use(s) to be constructed.
10A.3(3b) The type, location, and size of any signage which will be erected.
10A.3(3c) Parking for accessory uses shared with parking provided for the
principal use. The Planning Commission shall determine either of
- the following:
1. Tl�t the accessory use will have sufficient parking by
sharing parking; or
2. The number of additional parking spaces required for the
accessory use.
1
10A.4 Lot and Buildin�
10A.4 (1)
10A.4 (2)
Height Requirements and LiR
No limit shall be placed on the height of buildings in the
District.
Yard requirements for the R-3A Disttict shall be as listed
regulated under Section 10.4(2) a through d.
10.4(3) No lot shall be developed if its area is less than 80,000
feet. Lots not served by a public sewerage system shall
minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet of lot area per dw
unit.
Ltations
R-3A
and
�quare
ive a
Lling
10A.4(4) The minimum floor area require�nent per dwelling unit shalllbe as
listed and regulated under Section 10.4(3).
10A.4(5) The total minimum required lot area shall be 2,500 square
lot area per dwelling unit subject to the following allow
However, in no case shall the total lot area be less than
square feet.
10A.4-(6)
Deduction allowances:
- 300 square feet per underground parking space provided.
- 200 square feet per unit for units higher than four stor:
Eeet of
1ces.
30,000
- If total building coverage is less than 10�, a deductionlof
250 square feet per unit will be permitted.
Additions:
�
- For each bedroom in excess of 2 per unit, a00 square fee� of
lot area shall be added.
Useable Lot Area - Outdoor Living Space. Outdoor li:ving s ace
in the amount.specified below must be provided on the lot ccupied
by the multiple residence building. This space must be ea ily
accessible for daily use by the residents of the multiple esidence
building. Driveways, parking areas, purely ornamental are s,
areas having a width of less than 20 feet, and required fr nt or
side yards shall not be considered as useable lot area. A eas
developed for.outdoor recreation purposes such as t�nnis c urts
and swimming pools, indoor or outdoor, may be included as equired
useable lot area.
BUILDING HEIGHT
Up to and including
6 stories
Units above 6 stories
2
REQUIRED SQUARE FEET/UNIT
100 square feet/unit
75 square feet/unit
10A.5 Special Requirements
10A.5(1) Multiple family structures within the R-3A District shall have their
primary site access from at least a minor or intermediate arterial
as defined by the Transportation Chapter contained within the City
of Mendota Heights Camprehensive Plan.
10A.5(2) Multiple family structures within the R-3A District shall only be
permi.tted in conjunction with a Planned Unit Development as listed
and regulated under Section 19, except that the minimum site area
shall be 80,000 square feet and the site need not have more than
one principal building.
10A.6 Building.Coverage
No structure shall occupy more than 25� of the total site area.
10A.7 Off-Street Parking
10A.7(1) In addition to the applicable provisions of Section 18 of this
� Ordinance, the following minimum parking space and parking lot
- requirements shall apply in the R-3A District.
10A.7(2) A minimum of 2.5 parking spaces shall be provided for each dwelling
unit, one of which shall be located in or under the multiple
residence building or else completely underground. Parking spaces
not located in or under the structure shall have a minimum width of
nine feet by 20 feet in length.
10A.7(3) In addition to the above requirements, regula�ions listed under
10.5(2-7) shall also apply to the R-3A District.
10A.8 Architectural Controls
E
As listed and as regulated in Section 10.6.
10A.9 Structural, Electrical, and Mechanical Regulations
�:
As listed and as regulated in Section 10.7.
3
SURVEY OF MAXIMUM DENSITY REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY ZONING DI TRICTS
WITHIN THE METROPOLITAN AREA
1977
CITY CRITERIA
ANOKA 9,000 square feet + 1,000 square feet
for each unit over three
BROOKLYN CENTER 1,400 square feet per unit
• Bonus Points available
BURNSVILLE 1 Bedroom: 1,700 square feet/unit
2 Bedroom: 2;500 square feet/unit
Bonus Points available
CHASKA 1,200 square feet/unit
COON RAPIDS Efficiency: 1,800 square feet/unit
1 Bedroom: 2,000 square feet/unit
2 Bedroom: 2,700 square feet/unit •
' 3 Bedroom: 2,900 square feet/unit
- Bonus Points available
�
EAGAN • Six story building
EDINA Buildings over five stories
2,500 square feet/unit
FALCON HEIGHTS 1 Bedroom: 1,500 square feet/unit
2•Bedroom: 2,000 square feet/unit '
HOPKINS Buildings over seven stories
' Efficiency: 400 square feet/unit
� 1 Bedroom: 520 square feet/unit
2 Bedroom: 600 square feet/unit
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS 1 Bedroom: 1,000 square feet/unit
2 Bedroom: 1,500 square feet/unit
LITTLE CANADA � 15,600 square feet +
Efficiency: 1,500 square feet/unit
2 Bedroom: 2,000 square feet/unit
Bonus Points available
DIINNEAPOLIS 300 square feet/unit
MOUND 1,000 square feet/bedroom up to
2,000 square feet per unit
DIAXIMU DENSITY
37 u its/acre .
31 u its/acre
25.5 u its/acre
36 u its/acre
20 u its/acre
23 u its/acre
30 u its/acre
29 ur�its/acre
84 un�its/acre
43.5 un�its/acre
20 un�ts/acre
145 un'ts/acre
43 un'ts/acre
�
CITY
SAINT PAUL PARK
SOUTH SAINT PAUL
SAINT PAUL
WAYZATA
WHITE BEAR LAKE
CRITERIA
1 Bedroom: 1,500 square feet/unit
2 Bedroom: 2,000 square feet/unit
3 Bedroom: 2,500 square feet/unit
Efficiency
1 Bedroom = 1,500 square feet/unit
2 Bedroom: 2,000 square feet/unit
1 Bedroom: 600 square feet/unit
2 Bedroom: 900 square feet/unit
3 Bedroom: 1,200 square feet/unit
2,000 square feet/unit
Bonus Points available
Efficiency: 1,500 square feet/unit
1 Bedroom: 1,700 square feet/unit
2 Bedroom: 2,000 square feet/unit
BLOOMINGTON
_ SQUARE FEET/UNIT REQUIRED
STORIES EFFICIENCY 1 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM
1 story 2,000 2,955 3,600 4,275
2 1,920 2,795 3,440 4,085
3 1,840 2,665 3,280 3,895
4 1,780 2,535 3,120 3,705
5 1,700 2,405 2,960 3,515
6 1,620 2,275 2,800 3,3'25
Bonus Points available
* Al1 1 Bedroom at 6 stories
SOURCE: Metropolitan Council, 1977
MAXIMUM DENSITY
29 units/acre
29 units/acre
73 units/acre
22 units/acre
25.5 units/acre
19 units/acre*
' f 1�J.=10.08
�
ZONING
V I h _:�.•4,�. ;:'.
!il Siens.
� (1) (a) One busiaess sign for each toaer of teo or more st�;riea
� to exc?ed 400 square feet in area provided tfie sign is hacklit, ind��.ir:;:al
lo�o �r trademark mounted within 20 feet of the top of t:ne stru;.ture, or
'�1 (1�) Or,a business sign for each iadividual use larger than ]
� feet of floor are3 not to exceed 200 square feet in ar?a.
(2) One business sign for each individual �ise la:gsr tt►an 20,�Q0
flcor :irea not to exceed 100 square leet in area.
n hei�i�r, n;,-
lettPrs ��r a
O,O�Q sr,:;_r�
uare iee,t L.�
� SEC. L5.90.09. HESIDENTIAL OFFICE DISTRICT RO-50.
(a i Intent. It is the p rnnse of this district to pro�ide �eor a mix f �1;:�3 ��; �-^-•
priate to a high-density residential environment. It is intended tt3st this dist^i�:t ;.-
� vide an arrang�menC of land uses which incorporates oPPice and cumr.►er;;ir�l 3c ivitia� µ•:.i�-•�
are int�:rrelated to the principal resi�lPntial use. This �listrict is t� be z.��lie�i only ���
are:is �s�;.th dir�ct access to arterial or collector streets in prosinitf to t igf�-iaten:�i;.;
• empinyment areas and adjacent to public open space. While special atten�i� to design :.s
needed �o blend multiple iises on an individusl site, the u�lique character f sitPs �i�:���-
able f�r this d�lstrict will �rovide convenience and amenities not immediutel acail�ble ::�
mos: neighborhoods.
'i�'af/
#
3 _v
(b) Permitted Principnl lises.
(1) liulti-family dwellings.
(2) Public: uses.
(3) Transit stations.
(4) Accessory us2s customarily incidental and clearly subordi�ia
princiaal uses.
(c) Provisional Uses. N�ne. '
(d) Conditional Uses. ,
(1) O:Efices:
(2) Retail stores for the sale of arts and crafts, �ifts. flowers,
ceries, bakery goods, produce, dairy products� drug5, sundry items. books
magazinas� and apparel.
(3) Personal-service establishments including harber nad beauty sh
a.nd h�alth activities, dry-cleaning drop-oii and pick-up stations, lauiiderin@
vices iacidental to retail stores, and similar personal services.
(4) Athletic and recreation �acilities, separate from those provi
dent,.
(5) Vurs•aries, kin3ergartens. and day-care centers.
(B) R�stauc•ants, provided their access for custom�rs and servic�
fro�n acc2ss for r�sidential uses.
(7) Product design, �ievelopnent, and testing.
' (8) Utility uses.
to per;�itts:
�
plants, ;ra-
newsp&OP.TS�
�ps, eserc:i�� �
, renair ser-
ie3 f�r ras:.-
is separa��
• (9) E::panslon of �sisting uses which are not in conformity withldistrict u:�:
pr���risio�s. •
(e) 'dinimum and hiazimum Gross Density. The minimum densitv with
d=s�ric� shall be 20 dwellin uriits per zcre and the maximum density shall b
uiii�� p�r acre, eacept as t ese s an a: s may be m�dified by the provisions
(h) beioH. '
•;t) Dimensioc�al Reauirenents.
�:
�Sini�n�in lot ares:
aiinimiin lot width:
lfinimum setback, front:
',finim�i� setb�ck, side:
F.finii�i:.� sAtbaok, rexr:
?laximu;� �:tructure f�ei�ht:
\laxirn�im 5tructure iot coverage:
;�faximur� structure f1�or area ratio:
',Sinim�ir� ii�aUle op�:n s��ac2 for dwelling unit:
387
30, 0�0 sq�iare fe2t
2U0 feet
60 feet from arterial
streets, 40 feet from
strsc: ts
lu feet pliis .25 fnor.
one foot of str�icturF
excess of 20 feet.
Same as side setback,
instauce less th�n 3O
980 feet above nean s�
3G percen�.
.�0 °�r nonresid=ntia
400 square feet
,n t:�e R�-5U
� 50 dv�el l ir.ti
of paragrap:i
or cotlect�r
local
for esct�
heig;�t iu
but in uc
feeL.
a levei
uses
y 1�.40.09 BLOO�lINGTON CITY CUDE . � 19.40.10
(g) Afinimum Off-street Parking.
(1) �ulti-family dwelling units:
Required Number of
Number o` Bedrooms: Spaces per Unit:
0 ' 1
1 1.5
2 or more 2.0
At least one space per unit shall be provided in either a garage or indoor parking stall.
(2) For other uses, transit service, shared parking, and pedestrian orientation
will reduce the need for individual parking lots to accommodate peak deroand; therefore.
the parking requirements in the RO-50 district are 80 percent of the requirements in
Section 19.64 of this Code.
(h) Special Provis�ions. '
(1) No permits for development within the RO-50 district shall be issued by the
City until final site and building plans have been reviewed and approved by the City
Council, subject to the provisions of Section �9.40.12 of this Code.
(2) The provision of private balconies and porches directly accessible by indi-
vidual dwelling units creates usable open space more beneficial to the residents of multi-
familp dwelling units than open space situated away from their units. Such balconies and
porches shall be counted as contributing�to the usable open space requirement according to
the iollowing bonuses. The minimum area and width for a balcony or porch to qualify for a
bonus shall be 80 square feet of area and eight feet oi width.
Balcony or Porch Area:
First 80 square feet
Each additional one
square foot to 180
square feet
Counts as Usable Open Space of:
200 square feet
2.0 square feet •
(3) In the RO-50 district� the floor area oE nonresidential uses shall not
eaceed SO percent of the floor area of residential uses in any development; however, this
re�uirement shsll not apply in instances in� which the RO-50 district provisions are used
to regulate residential development in the CX-2 and CO-1 districts.
(4) Minimum gross density in the RO-50 district may be reduced to ten dwelling
units per acre provided that structure lot coverage does not exceed 20 percent of the lot
area and provided that the remaining vacant lot area provides reasonable opportunity for
residential development above 20 dwelling units per acre ior the entire site.
(5) Maximum gross density in the RO-50 district may be increased to 60 dwelling
units per acre provided that the lot area �s in excess of 200.000 square feet, that the
property fronts on an arterial street� and that it is contiguous to public open space
larger than the site itselY. _
�
(i) Signs. . '
(1) One business sign Por each •structure, not to eaceed 100 square feet in
area.
(2) One sign per residential development. not to eaceed 40 square feet in area�
idsntifying the name of the development.
SEC. 19.40.10. CONSERVATION DISTRICT SC.
(a) Intent. It is intended that this district provide areas wittiin the City�;for
habitat protection and wildlife management.� The Conservation District may be applie2i to
either public or private land where preservation of natural resources is appropriate. The
designation of a Conservation District not only will regulate land use within its boun-
daries, but will assure that adjacent land in other districts will not significantly
icpact the natural areas it is designed to protect.
(b) Permitted Principal Uses.
(1) Public and private natural areas, conservation areas, and wildlife manage-
r�ent areas.
<2) Public recreation uses.
(3) Accessory uses customarily incidental and clearly subordinate to permitted
principal uses.
(c) Provisional Uses. 5ingle-family dwelling uses in existence at the time of
ar�licstion of this zoning district to the property.
�88
�
��
F
�
- (1) Front Strcet Sctb�ck. ��'hcm m�rc Ih�n �Sro c�F
:. � tr�mi.i,: ��ii ti�� >iue ��i :i :lirct hct���rrn intci;cctic�nx i>
�•:.u�i�J h�• .tru�turc� lia�•ui� sctba�ks t'rom str�rt ri�ht•ol�-
��.iy, ul' Lfl':1lCf Uf lesser amc��in�s tlian hercinaftcr requirc�l,
Uic �c�ra�,c scth�ck uf �II existing builclin�s betwcen the
nucrscctiuns shall be m�inta�ned by all ncw or relocated
�iru�wr�s. !ii thc e��cnt � buil�in; is to be built wherc there is
w�h an cst�blisl�cd a��cr�ec setback dit7crcnt from th�t
��,�Ulfl'tI I1�fClll:l�lc:f and there arc existino buildings on oiie
.:�ic unit�, the front setback of s�id ne�v buildin� nced be no
r:rsccr than that of the next adjoining existing buil�in;. In
c�,c the buil�ine is to bc built where there is such �n
r�trblisl�ed a��erage setback and there are existin� buildinss on
hutta sulcs ot the s�id ne�v buildin;, the front setb�ck sh�ll not
he ccquired to be ;reatcr than that which would be established
bp cunncrtin� � straight line between the forwardmost portion
of ttie first a�jacent building on each side.
(�) Side Street Setbacli. The required setback from a
sidc street property line for a single family residence or its
�ccessory uses shall be increased from 15 feet to that req"uired
1'ur front street setbacks when there is an adjoining interior lot
lacmg on the same street. In such cases where a garage fronts
t:p�+n a side street, said garaee must maintain at least a 20 foot
�ecb�ck from the street right-of-way line.
� (3) Interior Side Yard. Sin�le family residence lots
ha�•irtg a w•idth at the bufldin; line of less than 60 feet may
h��•c an interior side yard less than 10 feet in width, but ir� no
� e�ent less than �ve feet. On lots 60 feet or more in width at
� thc buildin� line, residences whose average height above
cround level aloneside the residence is in excess of 15 feet shall
h�c•e an additional side yard dimension beyond that required
�,�� herctufore of not less than six inches for each foot the average
he�z;ht exceeds 15 feet. .
(b) Building Heights. Single family residences and
accessory buildings — 2-1/2 story or 30 feet maximum.. All
" utticr buildings — 3 stories.
(4) Roof Projections Into Required Side Yards. A
liouse roof may not be constructed within three feet of a side
prvperty line.
(5) Amended �y 811—A30 '
�. Requirements for Parfting. Off-street parking fac�Tities
o! ;he type and number hereinafter specifed shall be required
on ti�e site occupied by the permitted use. All parking areas
cunt�ining more than six spaces which adjoin either a public
ti:rcct or residentially zoned propeRy shall have a solid wali or
�cnce of not less than 3 nor more than 4-1/2 feet in height
a�,�r.; such 3djoinin_ line. A screen planting approved by'the
�;'.:��c Council may be substituted for the required wall� or
..,.,.. :�Il exposed driveways and parking areas shall', be
:::r!sccd ��•ith a hard, all-weather, durable, dust-free surfacina
::u::;ial �nd shall be properly drained and landscaped, and
�..,.! t�c maintained in a siahtly and well-kept condition.•No
^.,r•.:n_ area shall occupy any required setback, nor shall it be
..�•_.,trJ closer than five feet to a side or rear lot line, nor closer
:::�r. t�n le�t to any building. Each parkin� space shall have a
r•:��ti�:iium �vidth of 8-1/2 feet and a minimum depth of 19 feet
c�;:usi�•e of aisles and maneuvering space.
Number of Parking Spaces Required:
- Use
ti•:,:,�c i::mil}� residence
! '-�:cm�ry, junior and senior
• .;.!i �,:hools
�'cl:.�uus institutions, club
. ���us
r1NNCiiu�x u �.i�y u� cu��ia
Section 4. h4ultiple Residence Distr�ct.
1. Multiple Residence District B undaries. Tlic multiplc
residence district is hereby establish d ai�d sh�ll further be
diviJed into subdistricts desi�nated • s District R-2, District
R-3, District R-1, and District R-5, a sl�own un the official
zonin; msp of the Villaoe and by ame idments hcrealter ma�le
to tliis parabraph. �
2. Specific Uses Permitted in Distr cts. The %llowing uses
are permitted, iC and when a buildin perniit shall have been
issued Uy� the Building Inspector, an no persun shall erect,
alter, enlarce, move, demolisli, use, ccupy or maintain any
buildin;, struccure, improvement or premises without first
having obt�ined such permit:
(a) Principal Uses.
District R-2: :;
( I 1 Residences containin
(2) amended by 81]
District R-3:
(1) Residences containing
more than 12 dwelling units.
(2) Child day care centers.
District R-4 and,R-5:
(1) Residences .containing 5
� (2) Convalescent, nursing, • �
homes. •
(b) Accessory Uses. In additio
uses which are clearly and cusiot
principal uses, such as driveways, pai
the followin; additional accessory us
the lot occupied by the principal use:
Amended by 8I1—AS
Districts R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5, F
(1) Private recreational facili
pools and tennis courts, intended ;
enjoyment of the residents of the
guests. -
District R-5:
(1) Shops, restaurants, offi
rooms solely for use 6y non-profit c
uses shall be permitted within mult
provided they are accessible only fr
building and have no advertising or
which u visible from the outside of
than 10 per cent of the gross floor ar
devoted to these accessory uses.
� dwelling units.
5
less than three nor
more dwelling units.
and boarding care
to those subordinate
rily incident to the
ng areas, and garages,
will be pemutted on
including swimming
y for the use and
cipal use and their
es and club or lodge
�ganizations. Accessory
�le residence buildings
m the interior of the
iisplay relative thereto
he building. Not more
a of a building may be
,:
3. Restrictions on Lot Area, Buil ing Bulk`and Setbacks.
fn determining the applicable restrict on, the most restrictive
of the follo�ving standards shall govern
(a) Required Lot Area. The req ired number of square
feet of total lot area shall not be le s than the sum of the
minimum lot area for e�ch dwellin� u it thereon, adjusted by
the allowances permit[ed or impose liereunder, and in no
event less than the minimum total lot rea:
Number of Required Spaces
2 (enclosed space)
1 for every 3 seats in largest
place of assembly
I for every 3 seats in largcst
place of assembly
8asic Reqnirement:
District
R-2
R-3
R�
_ R-5
Maximum Amount af Atiowance Permitted
. District
R-2
R-3
. R�
R-S
Schedule of Attowances
Dist►�ic2
R-2
R3
, • R-4 and R-5
{b1 lat Cuverage and Plaor Area Ratia {FAR}.
Minimurrt Lot Area Per
Dwelling Unit
7,500 square feet
4,40Q square feet
2,500 square feet
. 2,SQQ square feet
• Minimum i'otal Lot
Area
15,l1Q0 squate feei
17,600 square feet
24,OOQ square feet
2 acres
Maximum Allowance
Nono
1,500 square feet per dwelling unit
1,500 square feet per dwell'in� unit
2,000 square feet per dwelling unit
0
Basis and Amount af Altawance
No Allawances. �
I. For each parking stall in or under th� multiple cesidence or otherwise
completely underground; subtract SOU sq. ft.
2. If the maltigte residenct is a part of a planned multigie residence
project involving no less than 3 acres of useable land; subtraet SOQ sq.
ft. per dwelling unit. _
3. For each bedroam in excess af two in any one dweliing unit; add 500
sq. ft. .
1. For each parking stall in or under ihe multiple residence or oiherwise
completeIy underground, subtract �00 sq. �'t.
2. If the rrtuitiple residence district is a part af a pianned mu2tiple residence
• project involving no less than 3 acres af useable land, subtract SQO sq. ft.
per dwelling unit. -
3. In the R-5 District, subtract I00 sq. ft. per dwelling unit per story in
excess of four, up to and including a ma�imam of 1000 sq. ft.
4. If the total lot coverage is less than ten per cent, subtract 25Q sq. ft.
per dwelIing unit. ' '
5. For e�ch bedraom in excess of two in any one dweIiing urut, add S00
' sq. ft.
District • Maximum Lat Coverage
R-2 • 20%a
-R-3 _ ` 30%
R-4 -� 30"!6
R-5 . 25%'
'The floor area ratio is the gross t7oar area af ail buildings an a lot divided by the lat area.
. (a) Buitding Height
DiStriCL
R-2 and R-3 � _
R� �
' R-5
Minimura No, of Stories
` 4:
- S
Maximurn FAR
1.2
Maximum Na. of Stories
2
4
(d) Useabte Lot Area. Outdaor living space in the amount specified below must be provided on the lot occupied by the mul-
tiple re;idence builtiin;. T'his space must be easiiy accessible far tiniIr use by the residents ot the muitiple residence buildin;.
Uriti•e��•�ys, p�rking areas, purely arnamenta! ure�s, areas havin� a width of less thasi '?0 feet and rec�uired side ar front yard shatl
r.at bc considered as Useable Lat Area. �
District
R-3 and R-�
R-5
R-5
Square Feet Per Dwelting Unit"
400
204 �- 5 and 6 story buildirips
100 — over 6 stories
'incrcasc �ll iigures by ] 00 sq. (t. if
� d«•tliitt�� �sr�tt h�. iti e�c�ss c�i � hrclr��c�ms
(e) Lat Area Camputation. Lat de�+ths in execs� c>f �OOr� aClot �viutt.s stiaU nrt be used in ecilrul;slin� !ut arcc�s.
154
�
�
��
�
�
�
�
(f) Setbacks and Yards.
District Front
R-2 30 feet
R-3 � 35 fcet
Side Yard
15 feet
30 feet
lntcrior
Side
]0'` feet
20 feet
*Add 6 inches for eacti foot the average height of the house exceeds 15 feet.
In Districts R-� and R-5, the minimum building setb�ck from any property line shall be no less than 35
hei�ht of the Uuildin;. ��'hiche��er is ore�ter. A buiWin= �vhuse length is ec�u�l to ur exceeds 4 times its avera
an �vera�e front )•ard setb�ck of not less than a distance equal to twice its average height. ln the R-5 Distric
or 6 stories in I�eicl►t sf�all be no closer to any R-I District properties, except tliuse ulilized for non-residcni
times the avera�e height of tfie buildina. For a 7 or 8 story structure, the setback shall be no less than 3 tin�
and for a structurc 9 or more stories in heigl�t, the setb�ck sf�all be no less than 4 times the buildinb heiglit
District properties, ercept ttiose utilizccl for non-residential purposes:
4. Building Design and Construction.
�(a) Design Responsibility.•�A building• permit for a
multiple residence building containing more than 4 dwelling
units shall pot be issued unless the applicant's building plans,
including flie site plan, are certified by an architect registered
in � the State of Minnesota, stating that the design of the
building and site has been prcpared under his direct super-
vision. Any building of Type I or Type II construction, as
provided in the Uniform Building Code incorporated by
reference by Ordinance No. 401, shall have its electrical,
mechanical and structural systems designed by registered
ericineers. Provisions of this paragraph shall �n no way prohibit
the preparation of the site plan by a professional site planner.
(b) Floor Area. The minimum floor area of an ef-
ficiency dwelling unit shall be not less than 500 net square
feet, that of a one bedroom dwelling unit shall be not less ihan
750 net square feet, and that of a two bedroom dweliing unit
sh�ll be not less than 9�0 net square feet. Units containing
three or more bedrooms shall have an additional 150 net
square feet of floor area for each bedroom in excess of two
bedrooms.
For purposes of ineasurement, the net floor area of a
� dwelling unit shall mean that area within a building used as a
single dwelline unit, and shall be measured from the inside of
outside walls to. the center of partitions bounding the dwelling
unit being measured, but shall not include public stairways,
� public entries, public foyers, public balconies, or unenclosed
public porches, separate utility rooms, furnace areas or rooms,
storage areas not within the apartment, or garages.
(� Sound. Party and corridor
systems shall be of a type rated by
engaged in sound testing as capable
avera�e sound transmission loss (using
not less than 50 decibels. Door systems
dwellin; units shall be of solid core coi
gaskets and closure plates. Room rela
signs, door and window placements and
ing installations shall be such that they
sound transmission from unit to unit.
: (g) Projecting Air Conditioning s
conditionina or heating units projecting
or windows shall be so located and des
unnecessarily generate or transmit sc
architectural amenities oP the building.
than 4 inches beyond the exterior fin
shall be pemvtted only with the w�
building inspector, �vhich shall be give�
tural systems prevent compliance.
(h) Trash and Garbage Incinerat
incineration of garbage and trash is �
houses or multiple residence sices of fou
as to row houses or multiple residence
units. There sh�ll be no exterior stora€
except in an accessory building comple
and roof. p�ended by 81Z-A6 `
(i) Elevators. Any multiple �
stories or more shall be equipped
elevator.
� (c) Efficiency Owelling iJnits. No more than 10% of the 5. Distance Between Buildings. No
dwelling units in any one building shall be ef�ciency dwelling closer to any other building than a di
�- units. of their respective heighu or 25 feet,'v
j
�
_�
�
�
(d) Below Grade Dwelling Units. No dwelling unit or
any part thereof shall be built at an elevation lower than the
elevation of the ground at the building site.
(e) Closets and Bulk Storage. The following minimum
amounts of closet* and bulk storage shall be provided for each
dwelling uriit:
(a) One-Bedroom Unit. 10 lineal feet of closet space
and 80 cu. ft. of bulk storage.
(b) Two-Bedroom Unit. 24 lineal feet of closet space
and 100 cu. ft. of bulk storage.
(c) Three or More Bedrooms. For each bedroom in
ercess of t�vo in any one dwcllin� uni[. an �dditional 10 lineal
feet of closet sp�ce and 50 cu. ft. of b�lk storaoe volume shall
be required.
'Only closet space havino a minimum clear �nish to
finish depth of 2'0'� sh�ll be consi�crc� in determining the
lineal feet of closct provided.
6. Accessory Buildings.
Rcar
�30 fcet
40 feet
cet or the average
� iItlLlli SI1�II Il:lve
;, any structurc 5
al purposes, than 2
:s the building ticight
rom any R-1
partitions and floor
laboratory regularly
of accomplishing an
� 9 frequency test) of
�etween corridors and
struction and include
ionships. h�llway de-
�lumbing and ventilat-
�ssist in the control of
id Heating Units. Air
hrough exterior walls
ned that they neither
�nd nor disrupt the
Tnits projecting more
h of a building wa(I
:ten consent of the
when building struc-
rs; Storage. Exterior
:mussible as to row
units or less, but not
sites of five or more
: of trash or garbage
;ly enclosed by walls
:e building of three
at least one public
g shall be located
equal to the sum
er is greatec.
(a) Accessory buildings shatl obs rve the same setback
requirements established for the multi le residence building
except that accessorv buildings located ithin the rear yard of
the multiple residence building may be 1 cated to within 5 feet
of the rear or interior side propercy lin . The Villaoe Council
ma}• require common walls for acces ory buildings where
common walls will eliminate unsightly a d hazardous areas.
(bl Exteriors of accessory bu;
exterior finish as the main structure.
7. Parking. There shall be provided �
the multiple residence dwelling at
enclosed p�rkin� space and one-half
parkino space for e�ch dwcllino unit in
dwellin^_. eYcept that in tiie R-? L
pro��ided two completely enclosed pa
Enclosed parking space in the R-5 �nd .
Uistnct mu�t be in ur under the multip
else completel}• underDround. Exposed
•�� Amended by 81�-A10, All,
shall have the same
, the siLe occupied by
ast one completely
nclosed or exposed
ie multiple residence
trict there sh�ll be
in; sp�ces per unit.
6,�tultiple Residence
resi�lence building or
�arkino areas sh�ll be
surfaced with a hard, ail-wcather, durable, dust-frce suri�cing
material and shall be properiy dramed and landscaped, and
shall be maintained in a siDhily and well-kept condicion, Na
parking area shall occupy any required setback, nor shall it be
located doser than f:ve Ceet ta a side or rear tot line, nor closer
than ien feet ta any huilding. Each parking space shall have a
minirnurn width of 8-1/2 Ceet an�a minimum depth of 19 feet
exclusive of aisles and maneuvering space. All parking areas
containing more than six spaces which adjain either a public
str�et or residentially zoned property shaU have a solid wall or
fence af not iess tllan three feet nor more than four and
one-half feet in height along such adjoining line. Such fences
or walls shall be so designed ihat they are architecturally
hatmoniaus with the principal struciures on the iat. A screert
planting approved by the Village Cauncil may be substituted
for the reqnired wall or fence. Guest parking stalfs shal! be
easily accessibto to or from the niain entry af the muitiple
residence dwelling. No street parking shall be permitted. In
addition to the above requirements, child day care centers
shall have one on-site parking space for each employee and
teacher.
8. Subdivided Lots in R-2 District. �Vhenever a lot in the
R 2 biultiple Residence District has been subdivided, as
provided in paragraph {c} af Sectian 3 of C}rdinance Na. $OI .
of the Village, as amended, but remains in such District, the
ru3ts and zegulations applicable in the District shai2 be applied
as if the subdivision had not been made.
Sec. 5. Planned Resident"sal District
� 1. Pu�pase. The planned development concept is rapidly
einerging as a means for encoura;ing creativity, imagin�iion,
variation and flexibility in the development of residGntial
areas. Its basic characteristic is thc clustering of housing in an
effort to preservc and protect natural am�nities, to provide
larg� expanses of useable open space, to reduce development
costs and yet to mair�tain singie family densities within ihe
overalI Planned Residential District. Tts purpose is to create �
new hiah-quality, low-density residential environment having a
miuture of housing types in a functionai and natural setting.
Amended by $11-A1 "
The Planned Resjdential District shall be divided into
subdistricts designated �as PRD-1, PRD-2. PRD-3, PRD-�, and
PRT)-5. PRD-I is praposed ta closely approximate sin�le
family develogments in terms of the number of units per acre
and couid accur in an R-1 setting. PRD-2 is propased to only
sIighdy exceed R•1 densities �vhile PRD-3. PRD-4. and PRD-5
approacimate apartment densities and thus anticipate a lesser
mixirtg of housing.
2. Objectives. The foliowing abjectives shall bt considered
in reviewing any petitions or �pplications far Planned Resi-
dential Districi zoning: r
{a} T'o encauraDe the provision of agen spaca and
recreational Cacilities in conjunction with residential develop-
ments.
(b) To encaur�ge developers ta use a more crcative and
ima�inative approach in the development of sesidential areas.
(c) Ta provide an enjoyable livin; enviranment b}•
preser�•ing e�istis�� topo�rapi���, stsnds of tr�es, ponds, t�lUod
pIains and simii�r natur�l ssscts.
(ci} i"a encoursge a varicty c�C ii��in; environrnents and
an �greeahle mixture ol�lrciusiiig t�•pcs.
te} Tc� persnit a e3r�ret u!� ilexihii�ty in envirv�rnient�f
design ���hirh is not pus�ihlc un�14r currcn[ rr_�ul�tiuns.
ts6
3. Requiremenis for the Estahlishment of Planned Re;i�
dential Districu. Before a petitiort or application tor 1'l�nncd
Residential District zoning may be acted upan, the fallaw�ng
conditions must be met:
(amended by 81i—A1�
(a} The planned� development site shat) be nat iess
than ten acres in area far PRD-1 zoning, nor less than five acres
in area far PRD-2, FRD-3, PRD-4, and PRD-5 zoning. The site
shall be under the controi of one awner or proup of awners,
and shall be capable of being planned and developed as one
integra2 unit.
(b) The numbec of dwelling un'rts wiitsin the site shalt
not exceed the number af acres therein multiplied by faur for
PRD-1, siac for PRD-2, 12 for PRD-3, 18 for PR.D-4+ and 24 for
PRD-5. ���+�u�r� L�r�i'��tl`��
(c) Open space shall be set aside or dedicated as
grovided in garagraph ? of Section 5 of tiiis {}rdinance, The
minimum amount of open space per dwelling unit to be so set
aside shall be as follows for each district:
(1) PRD-l: 2,000 square feet
(2) PRD-2: I,500 square feet
{3} PRD-3: 400 square feet
(4) PRD-4: 400 square feet
(5) PR.D-5: 40fl square feet
4. Boundaries of Ptanned Residential DistricL The bound-
aries of the Pianned Residenciat District shalt include the lands
as shown �an th� offcial zoning map of the Village and by
amendments hereafter rnade to'this paragraph.
{amended by 8I1—A13,15,-17}
S. Specific Uses Permitted in Pianned Residential District
(a} AII of the Principai Uses permatted in the Single
Family Dwelling District and accessory garages and parI:ing
facilities.
(b) Two-family dwellings.
(c) Townhauses, apartments and other similar hausing
tYPes. . '
(d) Recreational facilities as�permitted in paragraph 2 of
Section 3 of this ordinance. Recreational facilities may also
inciude swirnming pools. The use of recreational facilities may
be r�stricted to use by the owners ar occupants of the lots
2ocattd within ttze site and their guests.
(amended by 811—A46, Al) (e)
6. 1Fard and Site Requirements.
(a) 1�3aximum height of structures:
�{I} PRAl: Two staries 'for single and two-family
dwellings and three stories for all other structures.
(2) PRD-2, PRD-3, PRD�: Four star'res.
{3) PRD-5: Na maximum. Heig,ht sha13 be deter-
mined by tt�e setback required.
{b} Aiinimum nnmber oi par�:ing spaces required: .
(1) All residential d�vzllin; units: 3 enclosed spaccs
per d�veliing unic. {amended by $11—A10)
(3) Othcr permitted uses: as pravided in �ar�graph S
�f Section � af tizis ordinance. (am�nded by $11—A49}
tc1 Sc:ti>,icks (n,m slr�ets ci�si��n.itcsJ h�� tlr� 2'f:itsrzis3�,
D�partn�rnt as c:ulle�turs. :li[t(I;II�. �\F��tS:�\1-.i�s ur 1rrc�4a}•�
and from 1'I�nned Rczidci�tial District boundarics shall be
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: City Council
FROM: Paul R. Berg
Code Enforcement Officer
�����'� �
.�e/i v�i
�i xl�.v/a �
February 28, 1
SUBJECT: Building Permit Application for Coast to Coast Hardware S
� ���
�t� �Du�C�/
` fp ,�.as
Plans and building permit application were submitted to me on anuary 26,
1983, to create a Coast to Coast Hardware Store by E.D.S. Construct on of St.
Paul. The space proposed is to be 78'6" x 86', totaling 6751 squar feet;
5504 square feet for sales area and 1247 square feet for storage. lso, the
facility will contain two bathrooms and a managers office space. T e store
will be across the mall from the existing Country Club Market.
I have reviewed the floor plan and their proposed layout subst�ntially
complies with state and local codes. •
On Feburary 10, 1983, I talked to Mr. Jack Frerichs of E.D.S. onstruc-
tion and he said that their license fee, bond and certificate of in urance
will be sent to the City to complete the contractor license require ents.
I would recommend subject to Council approval that E.D.S. Cons
be granted a building permit to remodel the space to create a Coast
Hardware Store.
�
�`ruction
to Coast
SALES �REA� 55C34 S0..FT.
SCA��
l"= !0,
��A�T TO ��A�T
., _
►l A f I
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
T0: City Council
FROM: Paul R. Berg
Code Enforcement Off icer
March 1, 1983
��� ��,��
SUBJECT: Building Permit for Dakota County State Bank i
S1a.,4, i r � �
G.E. Marko, from DCR Co, has made an application for a building per it on
March lst for a job already in progress without benefit of a building p rmit.
The work involves replacing a glass wall and reinstalling a set of doub e doors
to change an existing lunchroom to a computer facility for the bank. T e glass
wall will be replaced with a standard 2" x 4" wall with 5/8" gypsum boa d applied
on each side to create a one hour separation between the existing hallw y and the
new computer room to satisfy insurance company requirements.
The contractor hired to do the work, Valley Investments, is current y licensed
with the City of Mendota Heights as a general contractor. They are cur ently
reinstalling the glass removed to afford security of the bank until suc time as
the Council gives permission to grant the permit. I can see no technic 1 reason
why the permit should not be issued, so the work can be restarted and r eommend
the Council rescind the verbal stop work order I have issued.
13Q x
_�,;,�_ . � ��H =
�'�:'� . o
f=E^.�:; N U L a AT i � N ,
_ � �' I ' �
{ � .
+�►—►------� '.r --�— . --�/ -
�K j , ' �* . � __ .- . ..
- � _ . , . . _ _ � . . „ . ur- �� • ��
-' �ur�..T-i,^r'� c..,�_ 1rr� S vJIn1GUv�l 3fi� X'It� rl • � j
._... _._. .. _._ � .. _ .. _� ��_ _ - — - - - - - ,,� � .. . �
_� . � N �' ' . .-< 3 ! ' . {
. . � . �� - ► I ;
�
� � C.LJI� FC,tTF'R R Q�tl� � i � � I � $ �
. - � � �(� •
i . s�� ?
; • � , '�!/� ` � j. • W�U.. . , " �
' . � ' = � � . , . .� ,''JjI��✓ GPT ! E1 .; • J 7"
,... .._ ..J � . �t. � jl�' : . .. � .. _:'��*-:."•�1:;� i . r
�� -�` _ « _ . . � _. .. ..._....,...... .r..,.... .... „��:. . ... . r - , . _ , � , - ..N.._.�...h.y.,_r�..�.,.,..,, , �.,- r-"-�--� __.�.�,..�..,�.,.,�._..�
.,».. ,. . � : _ ...—� i ��p� t ---- --�
I � �• � Y� �
' r � k - �
t ,� �
� � �/ _r._.. .L�.._ _ ..i,M
=r-
r--�-•-,, i � —� - I .. ._ . .
� _�.._�.,�_..__.��....__.. �...___�i`� � � 0; �. %-tfz. RATE� � .
; • ' � 0' ' .S�1�'ORAC� � "� J7"oFl AC7 �' `�
' �� � �i : 4 . � ~- , . :} 3 ° x
y i..._..._� .�� --_.. .�� . ;� . .._`_;.._..� ' � � :, ,�.,
' ; i �____,_ , •� � t� n.�E [..
1� �. q+ � k/z �;_ a � 8'-0 '� �
_____ - .
' . ' . , • . I � `� i. . �
'} , ^ i . � _�
- • � =y` .
«„� -
�N�v� �YP �p. ��z� ° . �r��oJ� �t�T � � � ._ . , . - , ,..�
� 7l� �YP• ��rt �a►►�-i'q�. G�r.� WAt,G . • Exrs ,�Pr: ��ctST.. Q;�'�
o� n� �lR�. R-��{`�,j • . � ` ' , � � `�
. r : , .. , . : .. . ' . • . .�,:�:�. ,:�° �y ° ". ,-_ .tc:; ; � , _,_�...�
•,� - . . • • • ,t,�,.:C s. � . �"K.cLa.;. ��c, ' r.k
:i ' ' :' �.r��.�. �r: .,..: ... j,
. : }�. ' • . : . , � '+ . ! . :n . ' `: , a ; '�' � ': 4c, t�sjr,�ti -�^.'-'..: '.�.. •' - . ��t'iir:�i ��
' ti, � �t',.;���Y . ` h- • cJ•�,• '', ,?{i� 1: ' �y,.�,� ' • Yh, � �
,��� �, , .x ",. � .,�ii '3� �,ltKY�' ,i'{��yr.'y; �i��•\�.
l�p,1 �S��.7J' Y . -.. ' ry„�' . " • � �t.'�'i...� �o:�. `.T'a+p':S� � » �,,n�r"�i.�J'y ,, ;,�v_ ♦ Y �.
+ ' , r ' �'W.'P,x`,rt`�?'/tf'�'y�^�i,as'''. . ' . , s� :�i• `'J�'�.'�i• .�f .� ,'r,^�'f<"3�'h.. . , 1�.. . �..;1y�::U;.'. ���ni��i'i.�'���+ �. . , S`
- � „f-�"*`�''+'� ?'�.�U:;' �•,.t +' . . . y . . . .,'': �:;a; �'-.�;...,.: a�F' . �. ,:`.�'v,�'' ��"���r�`""E
..�• �"�'...... ,...x ._. -.-: :..v.c, ....'.�.-,�� ---_-_ .•' r %�,i„ , _ f l;�.'��,� � ���'"" . ,�.t=�., ,,,. ..,,,,.
w..w�w.��.i _ .. . _- ...F.+�.}..,-,-,.a.,�-_.,, _ _ . . ' r•., -M - • - -*-�. .:t �� � ,�t t
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
' ' MEMO
February 24, 19$3
T0: City Council Members
FROM: Robert G. Lackwoad
Mayor
SUBJECT: Appointment of Assistant Fire Chief
it turned out thaC our appointment of Gene Lange as new Assistant P
Chief, effective February lst, was probably an unfortuna�e mistaka. Ac
Dale Peterson had conducted his affairs as though he were retiring at t
of December, I9$2, and turnad over ta Gene Lange aII the tangible and i
gible effects of the AssistanC Chief's position, The City did have an
ant Chi.ef acting in the month af January in the absence af Chief Naack..
On Tuesday, March Ist, T will be asking j�ou four members to recons
previous action, which will, in effect, have Gene Lange appoi.nted on J
1st, 1983, not February l, 19$3, as Assistant Fi.re Chief. If any of y
any reservations about taking this corrective actian, please call me b
Tuesday evening. This is a matter I would rather not discuss at any g
length at a public meeting.
re
ua11y,
e end
tan-
S51.S�-
the
have
ore
at
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
EAGAN
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS
WEST ST. PAUL
BURNSVILLE
WEST ST. PAUL
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS
BURNSVILLE
EAGAN
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ROSEMOUNT
EAGAN
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS
WEST ST. PAUL
BURNSVILLE
LAKEVILLE
APPLE VALLEY
SOUTH ST. PAUL
MUNICIPAL MILL LEVIES COLLECTIBLE IN:
1983
14.527
17.149
18.256
20.312
22.034
1982
15.207
17.669
21.959
20.796
19.467
ELEVEN YEAR INCREASE
20.312 - 23.12
14.527 - 13.53
18.256 - 10.88
22.034 - 12.23
17.149 - 7.90
19i
13.5
7.9
10.8
23.1
12.2
MILL INCREASE % IN REA
-2.808 -1 .14
.997 .37
7.376 6 .79
9.804 8 .16
9.249 11 .08
OPERATING/DEBT LEVY
1983
11.858 / 2.669
12.440 / 3.746
15.182 / 1.967
14.215 / 4.041
16.970 / 3.342
14.906 / 7.128
16.664 / 5.596
17.888 / 6.514
20.025 / 8.976
0
1982
12.6�+2 / 2.565
15.327 / 5.923
15.597 / 2.072
16.250 � 5.709
17.065 / 3.731
14.879 / 4.588
17.002 / 5.439
18 .0 73 / 7 . 340
19.238 / 8.704
Z-10-O,
O.J.J.
TOTAL
r1I LL
LEVY
226.60
233.39
241.78
241.81
243.59
233.23
249.10
238.19
244.65
zss.ia
297.04
318.56
291.28
97.09
95.42
93.19
96.75
89.27
89.854
91.070
90.119
88.552
STATE
MILLS
8.10
6,84
6.39
8.31
8.22
6. 84
18,32
17.14
�
3.57
2.92
2.64
3.44
3. 37
z.��
7.35
7.19
19?2 con er�.ed
New Ba is
CIfiY OF MENt' HEIGHTS
I30N-t;u
TAX LEVIES
. COt7NfiY
MILLS
40.04
41.57
44.Q3
44.39
42.35
44.�8
45.54
50.71
57.25
55.68
55.31
52. 77
58.67
19,56
29.67
19.25
19.42
19.44
17,400
19.242
19.80
19.873
$
17.62
17.83
18.20
18.33
17.41
19.I2
18.3Q
21.32
23.42
zi.6i
18.60
16.52
20.15
2Q.i5
20.58
20.64
2Q.07
21.80
19.36
21.17
21.97
22.44
91.�52 � � �I 19.594 � 21.95
$9.260
CITY
j MILLS
II 22.19
18.32
19.77
2d.77
20.96
2d.98
24.3$
24.58 1
26.12 1
35.70 1
39.74 1
43.79 1
40.60 1
13.53 1
12.64 1
12.4� 1
].2.36 1
13.02
15.044
15.961
15.13
17.672
15,207
14.527
�
9.79
7.84
$.17
$�.58
8.62
9.01
9.78
0.35
0.66
3.84
3.38
3.79
3.94
3.94
3.27
3.37
2.78
14.60
16.74
17.51
16.79
19.96
lb.5b
].6.2$
SCHOOLS
MILLS
156.27
166.66
171.59
168.34
171.96
160.83
160.86
145.76
161.28
166.72
201.99
220.79
1B7.17
62.39
61.44
59,00
60.60
54.14
5� .47
52.928
52.227
47.792
52.645
51.015
$
69.02
71.41
70.99
69.65
70.60
68.94
64 . 5'7
61.14
65.92
64,55
68.02
69.31
6�.25
64.25
64,4Q
63.34
62.64
60.60
60.63
58.p8
57.95
53.97
�2-SQ
57.31
57.15
METRO & MZSC.
MILLS �
1.21
4.84
1,61
1.67
2.47
4.37
2.67
2.94
2.939
2.962
3.215
4.049
4»124
.38
1.66
1,66
1.75
2.65
9.51
3.00
3.27
3.24
3.29
3.63
4.41
4.62
T A X E S
ANALYSIS AND COMPARTSON
Plus
SUMMARY REMARKS
For
CITY COUNCIL
Q.J.J.
3-I-83
s
ANALYSIS OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TAX LEVIES SHOWN ON PAGE 2
This analysis and review of the Mendota Heights non-ag tax levies s�ows an
interesting set of statistics.
Note that the 1983 levy of 14.527 mills is lower than: 1982, 1981, 1980,
1979, 1978, and 1977! It is necessary to go back to 1976 to find a low r City
mill rate.
You will note also that the same comparison and facts hold true for the
percentage of total tax levies. Note that the 16.28% for 1983 is the 1 west
since 1976.
No other unit on the sheet has that kind of a track record!
Dakota County has been quite stable but can't quite match our�.
---- School District ��197 has been up and down -- now is up.
Metro and Miscellaneous -- their trend is up.
- 1 -
CITY OF MEi�iDOTA HEIGHTS
� ' NON-AG
TAX LEVIES
�F�i�
PAYA.
�,960
6'
62
1963
E4
65
�966
67
68
1969
7a
71
1972
1973
74
�5
19 76
77
78
1979
80
81
1982
83
TOTAL
MZLL
226.60
233»39
241.78
241.81
243.59
233.23
249,10
238,19
244.65
25$.1Q
Zs�.o�
318.56
291.28
97.09
95.42
93.19
96.75
i
89.27
89.$5�C
91.070
90.119
88.552
' 8Z332
91.$52
89.260
STA2'E
8.10
6. 84
6.39
$.31
8.22
6.89
18.32
17.14
3.57
2.92
2.64
3.44
3. 37
2.93
7.35
7.19
1972 con erted
New Ba is
���
MILLS
40.04
41.57
44.03
44.39
42.35
44.58
95.54
50.71
S?.25
55.68
55.31
52.77
58.67
19.56
19.67
! 19.25
19.42
i
, 19.44
17.400
19.242
19.80
19.873
Zo . ls z
19.951
19.594
iTY
�
17.62
17.83
18.20
18.33
17.41
19.12
i8.30
21.32
23.42
21.61
is.�o
16,52
20.15
20.I.5
20.58
20.64
20.Q7
Zi.so �
19.36
21.17
21.97
22.44
24.51
21.72
21.95
GITY
bi
22.19
38.32
19,77
20.77
20, 96 •
20.98
24.38
24.58
26.12
35,70
39.74
43,79
40. 60
13.53
12.6�
12,47
22.36
�Ei3,az
� 15.044
�15.961
� 15 .13
�17.672
�y14.679
�15.207
�14.527
- 2 -
9.79
7.84
8.17
8.58
8.62
9.01
9.78
10.35
I0.66
23.84
13.38
13.'79
13.94
13.94
13.27
13.37
12.?8
14.60 �
i6.74 +�
17.51 ,y
16 . 79 �
19.96 %
17.$3 J�
Ib . 56 �
16.28 �
SCHOOLS
156.27
166.66
171.59
168.34
171.96
160.83
160.86
145.76
163.28
�.��.�z
201.99
220.79
187.17
62.39
61.44
59.00
�o.�a
54.14
54,�►7
52.92$
52.227
47.792
43.221
52.645
51.015
69.02
71.41
70.99
69.65
70.60
68.94
64.57
61.14
65.92
64.55
68.02
69.31
64.25
��.z�
64.4Q
63.34
62.64
60.60
60.b3
5$.08
57,95
53.97
52.50
57.31
57.15
METFtO & MISC .
1.21
4.84
i.61
1.6?
2.47
4,3?
2.67
2.9�i
2.939
2.962
3.215
4.25p
4.049
4.124
.38
1.66
1.66
1.75
2.65
4.51
3.00
3.27
3.24
3.29
3,63
5.1.6
4 .u41
4.62
COMPARE MENDOTA HEIGHTS LEVY WITH OTHER MUNICIPAL LEVIES
(SEE PAGE 6 )
l. Comparison of municipal mill levies.
Note that of the f ive surrounding communities, Mendota Heights is c
under our neighbors. Our 14.527 compares quite well to Eagan's 17.
22.034 for Burnsville. Note especially also that in 1972 we were r
lowest. Eagan and Inver Grove Heights were considerably below Menc
2. 11 year increase.
This comparison is presented to compare the growth of our neighb
Note that West St. Paul has actually had a 12.14% decrease in 11
the 7.37% increase for Mendota Heights compared to
67.79% increase for Inver Grove Heights
80.16% increase for Burnsville
117.08% increase for Eagan
All of these communities are assessed by the Dakota County Assessor
evaluations are jacked up regularly, we have every reason to believ
same process happens in Inver Grove Heights, Burnsville and Eagan,
the above mill rate growths are comparable.
To say it another way, our 14.527 mill is
85% of Eagan's levy;
80'/, of Inver Grove Heights' levy.;
72% of West St. Paul's levy;
66% of Burnsville's levy
3. Operating/Debt levy comparison.
The following comparison is necessary to further analyze municipal
a. Operating Levy -
Of the nine close or comparable cities, we have the lowest
mill rate! (See page 2 of the Auditor`s pamphlet). In D
lower operating mill rates are levied by:
Coates - 9.748 no debt
Lilydale - 2.816 no debt
Miesville - 3.022 no debt
New Trier - 7.208 no debt
Vermillion - 10.137 no debt
Actually our 11.858 operating rate compares fairly good witt
and Vermillion, and as you can see, is lower than Rosemount,
This poses some questions for policy makers:
- 3 -
�nsiderably ,
L49 up to
�t the
>ta Heights.
ing communities.
3rs. Note
. I f our
a that the
therefore
:inancing,
pperating
kota County,
� Coates
1. Has it really been the goal to keep the operating mill
at such a low comparable level?
2. Has the above result happened by accident?
3. Should such a trend of minimal operation continue that
Compare our 11.858 with the other eight municipalities:
Less than Rosemount.
----- Approximately 80% of Eagan, Inver Grove Heights a�
----- 70% of West St. Paul, Lakeville and Apple Valley.
59% of South St. Paul.
rate
way?
Burnsville.
These are comparisons based on the 1983 budget and f inanci g plans.
Does this kind of evidence and documentation convince you hat the
Mendota Heights budget and levy, as prepared by staff, and approved
by you, is minimal, is substantially lower than comparable communities --
and even might be too low? '�
t
You have the duty and responsibility to set a level of ser ice and a
taxing rate. I won't address "level of service" at this p int but
you did set a taxing rate that you should be able to justi y to your
constituents.
b. Debt Service Levies
c
Look at the debt service columns. Note that only one comm
has lower debt service than we do. Most have debt service
or more, higher than our 2.669 mills. Look at the growing
Lakeville, and Apple Valley -- from 5.596 to 7.128 mills -
two and one-half times ours. Some of you have expressed c
our debt management. I don't see that the above compariso
such and -- we plan to build a new fire station without ad
ad valorem debt service! Damn good debt service managemen
suggest.
Share of Ad Valorem Taxes
ity, Eagan,
evies 50%
urnsville,
two to
cern over
justifies
ng to the
I would
Where do we fit in the picture as concerns the municipal sh re of
ad valorem taxes? Note the right hand column on page 6. As noted
earlier in this presentation, Mendota Heights receives 16.2 % of ad
valorem taxes -- and this is the lowest since 1976. Compar our 16.28%
with the other eight municipalities. Only one, small examp e of a
"better" ratio. Note that a portion of Eagan has a ratio 0 15.96% --
but this portion has a total mill rate of 107.424 (compared to our total
of 89.260). In all other cases, with the many different sc ool districts,
all the municipalities get a bigger piece of the tax pie. t seems
again that the City of Mendota Heights has the questionable honor of
being the nice guy as concerns taxes.
- 4 -
SUMMARY
There are two main reasons for this tax analysis:
A. You should know our respective position in the ad valorem tax G
Each year I have Che opportunity (and urge) ta call y,our attent�
this kind of comparison. I hape you will see fit to ga forth �
the people of the miserly way we levy taxes.
ld,
to
te11
The 1983 Mendota Heigh�s municipal mil1. levy rates very favorab�ly on at
least seven comparisons:
---- 1. It is the lowest rate since 1976. Our 14.527 is lower�than any
of the previous six years.
---- 2, The Mendota Heights portion of the tax pie is the lowe t of any
in the previous six years. We now receive only 16.28% of the
real estate tax.
3. Only five cities,{and they alI are under S00 populatia�} in Dakota
County have mill rates lower than our 14.52.
4. West St. Paul has reduced its mi11 rate in ].l years, M�ndota Heighrs
has gone up only 7.37% compared to o�her increases of 7% ta 117%.
5. Our operating mill rate is lower than 15 other cities �.n Dakota County.
---- 6. Of the 22 citzes levying a debt service, only Eagan ha� a lawer amaunt,
1,967 mills campared ta our 2.669.
---- 7. Of the nine selected cities, we have the Iowest ratio �municipal
to total mills) of any, except for one small segment a Eagan.
B. A11 the abave figures, comparisans and "ratios are premised on the
1983 budget. You have seen fit to withhold personal compensatio
well below the budgeted amounts. You have set the stage for P'ol
ration by refusing to agree to the industry settlement of 6.6%,
in all probabilities, cast aver b.b% in wages plus $3,OOd or mor
professa.onal fees. Our very meager budget wauld have supported
increase nicely -- iC may not when the arbitratian dust has seCt
adopted
rates
ce arbi.t--
hich will,
in
he 6.b%
You have 9.nsisted on 6.O1 for Public Works and the non-union emp oyees. I
don't know what Fublic Works wil7. do -- accept or go on strike. The non-
union employees abviously accepted. In bath cases, the budget w s structured
to suppart the recommended increases.
You have, conscious2y or uncansciously, impased additional restr cCions,
limitations and withholdings on a budget °.Chat was very prudently and modestly
prepared by people quite close to the action. It goes wi.thout s ying that
the sCaff delivers services, spends and plans on the adopted bud et. You
have the unenviable duty to establish the present and future ope ations of
Mendota Heights. I£ the 1983 Budget and Capital Improvement Pro ram are
not acceptable in their present form, please advise as to some n w standards
ar goals. Yaur staff and employees can perform as a team anly wh n some
reasonable standards and goals are known and acknowledged,
- 5 -
� ( .
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
EAGAN
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS
WEST ST. PAUL
BURNSVILLE
WEST ST. PAUL
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ZNVER GROVE HEIGHTS
BURNSVILLE
EAGAN
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ROSEMOUNT
EAGAN
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS
WEST ST. PAUL
BURNSVILLE
LAKEVILLE
APPLE VALLEY
SOUTH ST. PAUL
MUNICIPAL MILL LI'sVIGS COLLf�CTII3LL IN:
1983 1982
14.527 15.207
17.149 17.669
18.256 21.959
20.312 20.796
22.034 19.467
ELEVEN YEAR INCREASG
MILL INCREASE
20.312 - 23.12 -2.808
14.527 - 13.53 ' .997
18.256 - 10.88 7.376
22.034 - 12.23 9.804
17.149 - 7.90 9.249
OPERATING/DEBT LEVY
1983 1982
11.858 / 2.669 12.642 / 2.565
12.440 / 3.746 15.327 / 5.923
15.182 / 1.967 15.597 / 2.072
14.215 / 4.041 16.250 / 5.709
16.970 / 3.342 17.065 / 3.731
14.906 / 7.128 14.879 / 4.588
16.664 / 5.596 17.002 / 5.439
17.888 / 6.514 18.073 / 7.340
20.025 / 8.976 19.238 / 8.074
15.96 - Applicable only in Cedar Grove area
where overlapping school debt results
in total mill rate of 107.424
2-28-83
O.J.J.
- 6 -
• 1972
13.53
7.90
10.88
23.12
12.23
%
�
� {o�r, �ow
INCR ASE
-12. 4
7 . 7 -- �
67. 9
80. 6
117. 8
% of T tal Mills
1 . 28
16,52 to 18.35
15.96 to 18.66
18.50 to 20.22
2 .37
19.94 to 21.50
22.27 to 24.65
21.71 to 23.27
25.16 to 29.17
MEMORANDUM
February 23, 1983
To:
From:
City Administrator
City Council
Chief of Police Delmont
Assistant Fire Chief Lange
Request an extraordinary expenditure of $1,036.93 be approved for re-
placement of 2 12'x12' garage doors on the lower level of the Mend ta
Heights Fire Station.
The lower garage bays of the fire department are used for police torage
of evidence and property of a large or unusual size, that cannot e stored
in our property room. The bays are also used to store police veh cles
during particularly cold weather.
The overhead doors to these bays have been in poor shape for some time,
but were not extensively repai.red because of the planning process for
the new station. They are now in such a decrepit condition that hey
are unsafe to manipulate. In order to avoid injury or total coll pse
of the doors, they must be replaced. Attached you will find two 2)
proposals for that replacement:
1. Crawford Door Sales
2. Don's Service Company
$ 1,184.00
$ 1,036.93
We recommend that this expenditure be approved and that the prop
Don's Service Company be accepted. There are no funds allocated
either the police or fire budget for this expense.
NOTE TO COUNCIL:
Although this expenditure was not specifically addressed in the 1
can be f inanced thru a combination of allocations from the Fire Depart
Maintenance, Police Department Sundry and Administration contingency.
These doors are in extremely bad shape, I would fully expect some
; or accident before we abandon, sell, or raze the structure, hence reco.
O.J..J.
2/24/83
al of
ithin
3 budget, it
nt Building
of failure
approval.
Rebruary 24, 1983
T0: City Administrator, Orvil Johnson
FROM: Chief of Police, Dennis Delmont
SUBJECT: Squad Car Purchase � ,
The time to replace squad cars is here again. I have examined the ids from
St. Paul, Hennepin County and the State of Minnesota and found the wo lowest
to be: �
Jerry Palmer's Southdale Ford, Ford LTD $ 8,610. 0
White Bear podge, Dodge Diplomat $ 8,797. 0
We have spoken to several other departments, our maintenance people and our
own officers and based on these conversations we reco�mmend the purc ase of
two (2) 1983 Ford LTD Crown Victorias from Southdale Ford. The cut off for
this bid is March 15, 1983 and vehicles must be ordered by then.
DJD/rmd
r
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEP�O
T0: City Caunail
FRQP�: Edward F. Kishel
City Engineer
February 23, 1983
SUBJECT: City of Mertdota
Praposed Sanitary Sewers & Storm Sewers
Job No. 8230
The following memo is intended to keep members of the City Council.informed as
to ihe status of a proposed sanitary and stor�n sewer improve�nent p oject being
considered by the City of Mendota, and how Mendota Heights may be ffected by
such project.
In Apri1 19$2, Edie Lancaster, Director af Community Development f
Couniy N.R.A., became involved in Water Wei1 Contamination�in Mend
need for a municipal sanitary sewer system. The Metro Council pro
Municipai Waier System but Edie was more for sart�tary and storm se
Qakota
a and the
sed a
T.K.D.A. prepared a sanitary sewer feasibility report in 1978 and a�storm
sewer report in 1981.
Following some diligent work, Edie and athers,managed to obtain forlthe City
of Mendota, a$1,q00,000.00 grant as part of a needed $1,200,000.00 project.
Now, Edie is trying to obtain the additional $200,OOq.00 in order t� complete
ihe entire propased prajec�.
In an effort to see haw sewers in Mendota may effect Mendota Neight , we have
been in touch with T.K.D.A. regarding canstructian plans, timing, s heduling,
etc. As of this date T.K,D.A. has not been ordered to proceed, pen ing ac-
quisition of an enviranmental repart and additional finances. They will keep
us informed. +
Two matters may concern Mendota Hei.ghts should sewers be installed 7n Mendota.
One, concerns the need for sanitary sewers to serve St. Peter's Chu ch and
Jacks !�lanufacturing adjacent to the river.
The other, is to consider the effects of surface runoff and sanitar sewage
from proposed Va11ey View OaEcs 2nd Addition being introduced by Lar Culligan.
With the City af Mendata apparently moving ahead, it seems advisable for
Mendota Heights to consider an a�verall view of the properties in P1en ota Heights
which surround P�endota.
We have in.fonmall'y di°scussed th�:mat�er.with T.K.Q.A., and find that�
they cancur with the above suggestion, and will caoperate where poss'
needed.
ible, if
City Council
Page Two
February 23,1983
As far as St. Peter's Church is concerned, a quick look at the situation in-
dicates that there may be some problems and that providing a means to connect
to the Mendota System will not be easy. It is most probable that a lift
station will be needed and that much rock excavation will be encountered.
The proposed Culligan plat will add surface water to the City of P9endota
where surface runoff and ponding areas are contemplated.
The installation of a sewer system in Mendota can eliminate the need for a
lift station in trie Culligan plat but will require cooperation and easements
from Mendota with the possible need for a joint powers agreement which can
be time consuming and may not be an acceptable solution.
At the last Council meeting, staff was requested to estimate the cost of a
feasibility study to provide sanitary sewers to serve St. Peter's Church and
others. We estimate the cost to be between �2,000.00 and $4,000.00.
To study sanitary sewer and surface water solutions for the entire area sur-
rounding Mendota could cost from $4,000.00 to $6,000.00 or more.
As matters develop, staff will continue to keep the Council informed.
MENDOTA'S UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
P1arch 20, 1983 - Environmental Study Complete and
Final go ahead.
' May 15, 1983 -
September 30, 1983 -
Take Bids ($800,000 Est.)
Project Complete
,;..�..w..,
I��� ���
3:� �
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Dakota County, P�linnesota
RESOLUTIOP� N0. 83-
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT
FOR IMPROVEMENT N0. 80, PROJECT N0. 1(PILOT KNOB ROAD;
WHEREAS, pursuant to City Resolution No. 80-04, "Resolution �equesting
Dakota County To Upgrade Rilot Knob Road North of I-494" dated January 8,
1980, Dakota County has satisfactorily completed the improvement of storm
sewer and street improvements to serve the Mendota Heights Industrial
Park area (Improvement No. 80, Project No. 1) in accordance with s ch re-
solution: i
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of th City
of Mendota Heights that the work completed under said resolution i hereby
accepted and approved; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLUED that the Mayor and City Clerk are here y directed
to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract in he amount
of $109,947.78, taking the County's receipt i�n full.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this Fi}�st day
of March, 1983. �
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF M�NDOTA HEIGH S
:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
Robert G. Lockwood
Mayor
�I
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Da4�.ota County, P�innesota
RESOLUTION N0. 83-
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
PILOT KNOB ROAD STREET IMPROVEP4EN7S (IP�PROVEMENT N0. 80,
PROJECT N0. 1)
WHEREAS, contracts have heretofore been let for the construct�
following described improvements:
The construction of street improvements consisting of the
widening of Pilot Knob Road (County State Aid Highway No.
31) between I-494 and Transport Drive including the ac-'
quisition of easements and the grading, stabilization,
drainage and bituminous surfacing of said portion of said
road.
and
'�° =�'
°, �.
on of the
WHEREAS, the construction of said improvements has been substa�ntially
completed. �
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of tf�e City
of Mendota Heights as follows: �
1) That a portion of the above described improvements shall b�E
assessed against all properties benefited by said improvements�.
2) That the City Clerk with the aid and assistance of the Cit
Engineer be and is hereby authorized and directed to prepare t e
separate assessment roll for the above described improvement
showing the proper amount to be assessed against each of the 1 ts,
pieces or parcel of land benefited by said improvements.
i
Adopted by the City Council of the City of P�endota Heights this Fir t day
of March, 1983. ,
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Robert G. Lockwood
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kath een . Swanson
City Clerk
��,� � .� �
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Dakota County, Minnesota
RES4LUTION N4. 83-
RESOLUTIOM CALLING FOR HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLL
FOR PILOT KNOB ROAD IMPROVEMENTS {IMPROVEMENT N0.
80, PROJECT N0. 1)
t�1NEREAS, cantracts have hereiafore been lei for the coristruc�ian of the
following described improvements: ,
The construction af street improvements consisting of the wi ening
of Pilot Knob Road (County State Aid Nighway No. 31) between I-494
and Transport Drive including the acquisitian of easements and the
grading, stabilization, drainage and bituminous surfacing of �said
partion of said road.
and
WHEREAS, the construction of said improvements has been subst�antially
completed; and �
WHEREAS, the Ciiy C3erlc, with ihe aid and assistance of the C'ty Engineer
was previously directed by the City Council to prepare the assessm nt roll
for the above described improver�ents; and
WNEREAS, the Gity Clerk has notified the City Council that a roposed
assessment roll for the above described improvements has been comp eted and
filed in her office far public inspection.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City �ouncil af t�e City of
Mendata Neights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That a publie hearing on the proposed assessment rall for the
Pilot Knob Road Improvements shall be held at the P�fendota Heights
City Hall at 750 South Plaza Drive, in the City af Mendat Heights,
on iuesday, Apri1 19, 1983 at 7:45 o'ciack P.P1.
2. That the City Clerk, wiih the aid and assistance of the C�ty Attorney,
is hereby authorized and directed ta prepare and attend t the
publication and mailing of the necessary notices of said earings,
all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota statues.
Adopied by the City Cauncil of the City of Mendota Heights this Fi st day of
P�arch, 1983.
CITY COUNCIL I,
CITY OF MENDOTA NEIGHTS
By
Robert G. Lockwoa
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. 5wanson, City C1erK
T I t'� ��� _ � ,�n �C. �i'C't/tJ {�. 1"'Cj,GtJ J�G.
" �`; (��,,":,=�'"�il l��l�l'�C,�
�=r�, � `, �_
r; -,7 r�
�a �f r I
� �� ����������� �
3 ,
; i� t�;
. '� �� ��t�u�l � �� !�
� �I '
��
�__�
. .1,�.�_-_� �� --- ��t�-,
�.._ -:_.��.�: � ��--�— .. _ ���. :
�f
F'ROM THE OFFIC�
P.�.I�TL, �., ?��c�.C�.�I�' c� �C�I�
233 1?aknta 1Svunii� W�:ST $T. P tii. I F7, TyiINN,
�t�N•IE:IUTA flEGIST�iTF.D LAtJU aIIRV 'fOA.�'i
I Hexeby Ceriify fha� ;1�is �>l,�t �f�cativs a surv�y ac4e 1�y me of ttze prope
described cir, this ��'.tat, anrl t h�it tl�c� cn: nt�rs are Ct7Y' C'Ctlj% ;;laced as shoGYn, ;
th�if ;�ll lurati�m�, rncrr::i•hn��•i�!:,, ��tc., h;i��� l�cxn rc�rrrctly sf;c,wn.
`-: •rveY�'d.Fo� ...Pe;:tEi..J, !le�tnrich
�,,,;�� Sc�ptetnber. 21, lt)��
:ir'Qje ...1'..l�Ci1 — ,J� i�_'f.'�'i.
W. 1?. 1�!�cL�.Cy�P�'
.�F:PY"fY
Ti,�j� .j{-� f/l (tXCG, ti�.,..�
� �
i)C':i� r lj:� tlt�)1
k�. 11PicL1�G1�A1'
f7 1!t�",'A (.'OUNTY SL.FVEYUR
C:o:��rencin� at a��aii�t oi� t�ie :ast 1i;�� r>,i .��ctiar� 27, ":
S$ 1 tj �(� 1. 7? f' �1? J!1 S' i) � �% . i�{' C'. j' S(? 11 t� 1 (`S r �' � i t' �ti (l L'i ? l t� it �: f" C'. I; il f' i t� �
. e'C"10E' •�'�h.'S� ::� �. �_`i f �'l:' t � Cllt?Iii.i? .'�1;,, tii i�: , `':`i . 2 1C�ts�1!t':, ..��.ti'L .
1':f' :i4:� i 1 lIl(? i•� �l?`f)i'l'. �i.l�.? Si'�: l �(1[I � (.iif'.:•t'i� ,�it �'�1 <l.� C�il�', .��i L�� .
iC.)`1 �'(�l.�+i t.%+ �(��� i�l,)i. il '��f� l�i:� li�i7'ill`�.
� 7
�
�
�
- • - _ �� �,
r�E CaF:. OF S�,C. 2?, "C.28P1.�R 23W� I
o :ir�clic4t�s i.r4n
{,�-- � Z/ __ _...___._.._.�� q�_�-:._
!'
I
�22b.35•
__...__ - ------ - ----o
�i(} �f ��fa?J H9
i � ��0� �7� �S,��C�
r ' f— �
i~" � S
z i 1
� � `� t
j d o �_ � .��a�dm
� 1 � _. ` _. ..
t_ _ _ T ._ `. __ _.
,.�.� a n+ a s
,.. .. ... ..n a. w. ,� .� .ri�
:��� t;�rt;t ;;t �� � . Cl ?Socl ,�..�d
� • .�in�s a�m�s
� � .
I '
� .� -� - -- — _ ...._ � ^ � � uj� �. _ - - - —
7U� 1 ..'ti`.��_t`�1��. NT-
i
'J T-' -_.—__.___...._._ ._. _... 'O ^---'
��.._._._..._.._. _..—..r._—._.�..._— C 4� H. � J �
I'
N
. � �
i �
�i T
�
; I .
� '
..---- .�
;aU�
.�
!�. �
� �
M
�
�
_ p
�
-- r
' N�
� �''
w�
�
'L
� �
z
J
W
J
,i0
��
� J
. 2���. ,K.23t�'. ,
��i� �,Cc:tiOc2,
r>: .:3�t r�_��t t�.
:":,.(._t::l :li'1^