The URL can be used to link to this page

1983-01-04f CITY OF MENDOTA H�IGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA � AGENDA � JANUARY 4, 1983 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Administration of Oath of Office to Mayor Lockwood, Counc�ilmemb and Witt. ' 3. Roll Call. � 4. Approval of Minutes, Decemb�r 21, 1982. ' 5. Consent Calendar: a. Metropolitan Council letter on Mortgage Revenue Bond plan b. Code Enforcement monthly report for December., c. Approval of the List of Claims. d. Approval of the Licenses. ' e. Memo on Planning Commission terms expiration. f. Memo on Park and Recreation Commission terms expiration. End of Consent Calendar: ` 6. Department Reports: "r�,�.� �� 4-� a. Memo from Police Chief on mobile radio.replacement. b. Memo from Fire Marshall on Scott-Air-Pac replacements. 7. Communications • .� a. LMC Letter or� LGA distribution formula. • ` � � , � 8. New Business: a. Appointment of Acting Mayor for 1983. � b. Appointment of Health Officer for 1983. c. Designation of Official Newspaper for 1983. (See attachec Dakota County Tribune and Sun Newspapers). �! � " `� � . �,��, "_ � �, _ .. 1 � j V Z 4 �6j�r�� . !;+� , .� � � �s Hartmann'� �t�; � � , . ' 1 � � .. , � - , y *�'� �r1 . � etters from ' # , � .. � Public , t � . Mayor , ` ' � ., , ` � City Administrator , • �� , � , — ., � a. Approval of Metropolitan Council pl nning loan agreement. Details � available Tuesday evening°.) �P�c� ��r��P�o y�e.h f- pr � �!y/fjO1/%` � � b. Revised 1983 non-union salary recommendations.� � c. LMC 1983 City Policies (available Tuesday evening): � . ? .1 . 0 � t. . January 4, 1983 Agenda Page Two ` /��NJ7oUT� I�es �'.r d. Recommend approval of 1983 Budget an I.P': (Distri uted r + 3 ♦ �� e. MAMA Labor Relations Service. (See note on 2nd page). � �r��d ��u� c�� if,y for ��n�mt� �6�� Councilmembers �' �h e/'� 7�0 � n r k wi'�h bo v< Z� l�o/�" City Attorney �l � '�A /� �` )'t'y � � �� /' 0�� o �'`s� �i¢ t �`�--i� - /y City Engineer , . Public Works Director � ` . - a. Memo on Municipal State Aid Street System. (See attached resolution). b. Memo on MAC Property Feasibility Options. Treasurer a. Approval of Pledged Securities. (See attached). b. Designation of 1983 Depositories of City Funds: ---��/r•�i Dakota County State Bank Cherokee State Bank Signal Hills State Bank Minnesota State Bank Mn Federal Savings & Loan First National Bank o: NW National Bank of St. Paul American National�Ban] City Clerk ' 9. Adjourn. . t � ` � � � / /� � `r ••c r �� ..� � ' , / � 1 � � / I /1I / , / � � � � / ,r; / / / , � ` � / - � � �� / , i , / % / � _ ' „' ___ , ,. I 12-7-$2). ' � 1 1 � �'i �' � : '�, - `a �r fl e�r ,bs f : 9 �►i':vv�� t� T ' �roposed � UT F�es, , ��f �� : St . Paul : of St. Paul � � � --� �/�; �� /�/ 07/% � /� , � � � � s��_. � �� -�,,.. � � � �� a.��--►�- �-�— � ,� � . . Pac�e No. I758 Decc:mlaer 21, 1982 CITY OF MENDOTA HEZGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESCITA Minutes of the Reguiar Meeting Held Tuesday, December 21, 1982 n Pursuant ta due call and notice thereof, the regu7.ar m�eting of the ity Cauncil, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:3Q o'clock P.M. at �he City H 11, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heigh�s, Minnesota. Mayor Lockwaoci ca].led the meeting ta arder at 7:30 P.M. The fallawi�g members were present: Mayor Lockwaod, Councilmembers Hartmann, Losleben, Mertens tto and Witt. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ' Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilman Hartmann movecl approval of the m�.n tes of the 7�h meeting. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. CONSENT CAZ�ENDAR Cauncilman Losleben moved approval af the can ent calendar, as submitted and recammended tor approval as par of the rec�ular aqenda, along with authorization for the exec tion of all necessary documents contained therein. 1. Acknawledgement of a mecno from the Public arks Director an the proposed I-35E noisewall. ' 2. Acknowlecigement of NDC4 agenda frsr Decembe 15th and minutes of the NDC4 December lst meeting. 3. Acknowledgement of the Treasurer's monthly�x�eport �or Novembe 4. Approval af zhe List of C].aa.ms dated Dece�er 21, 1982, and total3ing $101,065.66. - 5. Approval of the List of Licenses, granting�licenses to the fol.lowing far 19$2: A11 Season Remodelers MAC Heating & Air Conditianing Temperature Control, Inc. �.983 Contractor Licenses: Daily & Son Blacktopping, Inc. Dahn Builders, Inc. Johnny Masonry, Inc. '.Crapp Concrete & Masbnry In�ayne Canstructior_ Co . , Inc . Carl,on S�wer Company, Inc. A . Kamish & Sozls , Tnc . l�ick Levine Excavatinq Ca. Gen ral Contractor Hea ing & Air Cond�. Hea ing & hir Condt. As��a lt ic jConcr. e te Con rete C�rz rete Coil z et� Exc�vati.nc� P�Yc v�ting Exe� vat5.ng � Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 1759 December 21, 1982 Ralph's Plumbing, Inc. Richfield Plumbing Company Southview Sanitation Sun Excavating, Inc. Thompson Plumbing Co., Inc. Weierke Trenching & Excavating Co. The Birch Company Northeast Sheet Metal Geo. Sedgwick Heating & Air Condt. Standard Htg. & Air Conditioning Fred Vogt & Company Ray N. Welter Heating Co. Bream Homes, Inc. Dodd Construction Corp. K.J. Johnson Construction, Inc. Loeffel-Engstrand Co. Mendota Heights Landscape & Tree Svc. Minnesota Exteriors, Inc. Patron Builders, Inc. Twin City Storm Sash Co. Viking Automatic Sprinkler Air Comfort, Inc. Allied Metalcraft Co. Arneson Heating Service Co. The Birch Company Northeast Sheet Metal Geo. Sedgwick Heating & Air Condt. Standard Htg. & Air Conditioning Fred Vogt & Company Ray N. Welter Heating Co. Befort Roofing, Inc. Berwald Roofing Co., Inc. Leroy Signs, Inc. Midway Sign Co., Inc. Suburban Lighting, Inc. 1983 Cigarette Sale Licenses to: a �xcavating Excavating � Excavating Excavating Excavating Excavating Gas Piping Gas Piping Gas Piping Gas Piping Gas Piping Gas Piping General Contractor General Contractor General Contractor General Contractor General Contractor General Contractor General Contractor General Contractor General Contractor Heating & Air Condt. Heating & Air Condt. Heating & Air Condt. Heating & Air Condt. Heating & Air Condt. Heating & Air Cond' Heating & Air Cond. Heating & Air Condt. Heating & Air Condt. Roof ing Roofing Sign Erecting Sign Erecting Sign Erecting Twin City Vending Co., Inc. - ComServ School Country Club Markets, Inc. Employees Party Club Lyons Pride Convenience Stores, Inc. Twin City Vending Co., Inc. - Mendota Heights Standard Par 3 Golf, Inc. Snyder's " Surfco Station Tom Thumb No. 563 1983 Rubbi.sh Hauling L3.censes to: Action Disposal System, Inc. Mendota Heights Rubbish Service, Inc. Remackel Trucking Councilman Ha.rtmann seconded the motion. C Page No. 1760 December 21, 1982 ABATEMENTS County Assessor Bill Peterson was present to approval of an abatement for Parcel No. 27-5 Peterson explained that the abatement is nec ' of an error wlaich was made in keypunching at He recommended that the abatement be approve Ayes: 5 Nays : 0 request Council 7000-031-02. Mr. �ssary because the County offices. Mayor Lockwood moved approval of an abatemen for Jean Franson and Don I. Perron for Parcel No. 27-57000-03 -02, reducing the assessed value from $2,254 to $1,750. HEARING-ZONING Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the p pose of a public ORDINANCE REVISION/ hearing on proposed revisions to Sections 3 nd 4 of the MANUFACTURED HOUSING Zoning Ordinance and the addition of a new s ction 10A, R-4, 'tnanufactured home park district". Mayor Loc ood briefly reviewed the proposed amendments. The Council expressed concern over a potentia variance requests if the revisions in Section There was particular concern over the propose siding width. It was the general concensus o the Ordinance amendments should be adopted bu should be provided to allow processing of var to building code provisions on a more streaml Councilman Mertensotto suggested that Section Ordinance could be amended to provide a speci the Code Enforcement Officer would prepare a Council on such•variance requests. If the Co � Officer indicated in his memo that the reside would be in substantial compliance with the b � that all other provisions of the zoning ordin ' variance request could then be considered by prior input from the Planning Consultant or P increase in 3 and 4 are adoptf . requirement on ' the Council that some procedure ances which relate ned basis. 4.18 of the Zoning 1 procedure whereb5 emo to the ' e Enforcement tial structure ilding code and nce are met, the he Council without anning Commission. Mayor Lockwood asked for questions or comment� from the audience.! � There being no questions or comments from the audience, Council- ; man Losleben moved that the hearing be closed at 8:30 P.M. Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 ', Nays: 1, Lockwood Staff was directed to prepare a final draft of the Zoning �- Ordinance amendments for Council adoption, alo g with proposed revisions to the variance procedure requiremen s. COMMUNICATIONS The Council acknowledged receipt of a letter f om William Sheehy regarding the Mendota Plaza Shopping Ce ter. INDUSTRIAL REVENUE Mr. Ralph Linvill, from Linvill Associates Com any, was present FINANCING to request the Council to establish a public h aring on his request for the issuance of $2,750,000 in Indu trial Revenue � Financing. Mr. Linvill briefly gave the Counc l.a background Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 17G1 , December 21, 1982 �' on his company and advised that he is requesting the Industrial Revenue Financing in order to construct an approximate 65,000 square foot office/warehouse facility at the northwest corner of Pilot Knob Road and Northland Drive. After discussion, Councilman Mertensotto moved the adoption of Resolution No. 82-99, "RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE OF SAID HEARING", the hearing to be conducted at 7:45 o'clock P.M. on January 18, 1983. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. The Council advised Mr. Linvill that they would be interested in receiving details at the hearing regarding finance/cost infor- mation, building plans and a proposal for employment possibil- ities, traffic, tax revenue projections, and other similar information. I-35E The Council acknowledged a letter from Mr. John Rutford, Metro- politan Council Referral Coordinator, relative to review of . plans for I-35E. Administrator Johnson recommended that the Council respond to the Metro Council recommending approval of a directly connected I-35E. The Council members felt that the Metropolitan Council should be reminded of a resolution passed by the Council several years ago which stated that if a parkway system for I-35E through St. Paul is approved, the City of Mendota Heights wants a similar treatment of I-35E through Mendota Heights. Councilman Mertensotto moved to notify the Metropolitan Council, through John Rutford, Referral Coordinator, that the City of Mendota Heights recommends the expeditious�review and approval of Mn/DOT's plan and statement for a controlled access highway I-35E from TH 110 in Dakota County to I-94, being directly connected to I-94 near downtown St. Paul. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 EI�LOYMENT EXTENSION The Council acknowledged receipt of a letter from City Engineer Kishel requesting an extension of his employment through 1983 in accordance with the provisions of the Personnel Code. Councilman Mertensotto moved that it be deemed to be in the best interest of the City that City Engineer Ed Kishel's employment with the City be extended through calendar year 1983. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MENDOTA SEWER SYSTEM The Council acknowledged a proposed resolution from the City Administrator supporting an amendment to the Metropolitan Council Water Resources Development Guide, which would auth�` acquisition of a part of the Mendota Heights Trunk Sewer li►ie in order to accommodate construction of a sanitary sewer system in the City of Mendota. C, � . J Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 1762 December 21, 1982 Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Re olution No. 82-100! , "RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AMENDNIENT TO WATER RE OURCES DEVELOPMENT GUIDE". , Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. MISCELLANEOUS The Council acknowledged receipt of the Asso iation of Metropoll itan Municipalities Policies and Legislative Proposals. PERSONNEL � The Council acknowledged and discussed a mem ' Administrator regarding a proposed 1983 pers � compensation and benefit plan for non-union � Administrator Johnson indicated that the pro reflects an over-all 6.19� increase over 198 that the proposal recommends an increase in : contribution by the City of $20 per month, 'r bution to $130 per month. . There was considerable discussion by the Cou Hartmann felt the increases for the non-unio be comparable to whatever the union settleme Mertensotto felt that the salaries should he . across the board, rather than variable perce Councilwoman Witt moved to accept the salaxy Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. ' After additional discussion, Mayor Lockwood original motion to pare down the original p ' package of 6� or less, including insurance. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.' i Vote on Amendment Ayes: 5 � Nays: 0 , Vote on Original motion Ayes: 4 Nays: l, Mertensotto � The City Administrator was directed to bring � compensation plan for Council approval. ' C� v h.r�G��red� The Council �� a request from the City his monthly mileage allotment be included wi � for 1983. from the City nal services nployees. �sed salary sched . He also stated salth insurance i.sinQ the contri- il. Councilman employees should s are. Councilm ncreased 6� ages. sal as present ed to amend the sal to a total a modified nistrator that his salary IMPROVEMENTS Public Works Director Danielson reviewed and xplained three , memos to the Council regarding two proposed p blic improvement projects. He requested that public hearings e established on January 18th to consider proposed construc ion of the watermain crossing at Wagon Wheel Trail and I 35E, the proposed construction of public utilities to serve the Acacia Park/MAC property, and on the proposed watermain cross'ng at Mendota Heights Road and I-35E. Page No. 1763 ` �� December 21, 1982 Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Resolution No. 82-' "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR A HEARING ON WAG�... WHEEL TRAIL/I-35E WATERMAIN CROSSING (IMPROVEMENT NO. 81, PROJECT NO. 2)". Mayor I,ockwood seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Resolution No. 82-102, .. "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR A HEARING ON MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD/I-35E WATERMAIN CROSSING (IMPROVENIENT NO. 81, PROJECT NO. 3)". Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilman Hartmann moved the adoption of Resolution No. 82-103, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR A HEARING ON PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE ACACIA PARK/MAC PROPERTY (IMPROVEMENT NO. 82, PROJECT NO. 2)". Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. The Council requested that Public Works Director Danielson prepare a report on the proposed Acacia Park/MAC property improvements, addressing the various options available to the Council. TRAFFIC SIGNALS Public Works Director Danielson reviewed his memo to the Council relative to the proposed upgrading of the traffic signals at TH 110 and Delaware Avenue. Mr. Danielson also reviewed his proposed resolution requesting the County to reassess its..policy on cost-sharing and financing for the pro- � posed signal upgrading. It was the concensus of the Council that if there is no change in the County's policy regarding cost-sharing and financing on the proposed upgrading, that the Council will not support the upgrading. Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Resolution No. 82-104, "RESOLUTION REQUESTING DAKOTA COUNTY TO REASSESS POLICY ON COST- SHARING AND FINANCE FOR TH 110/DELAWARE AVENUE UPGRADING." Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. 4��i�'>�a.�.c��•� Aye s : 5 ".�..."'..w"'""�" ( Nays: 0 ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilman Hartmann moved that the meeting be adjourned, Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:53 o'clock P.M. Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk ATTEST: Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor � �i,.t1 13 �is I�J.U`,7 December 20, 1982 . �t.�� ;cC:.. Dt;G `' � �;,�� (-, w ..,:.> Mr. Mark Ulfers, Qeputy Directar Dakota Cotznt,y Housing & Redevelapment Authoriiy 2496 - 145th Street West Rosernount, Minnesota 55068 RE: Mortgage Revenue Bond Cities af Eagan, l�lest St. Paul and Mendota�Heights Metropolitan Council Referral Fiie Na. I0845-1 Dear Mr. Ulfers; 5<>�'� ;' t At its meeting on Dec�mber 9, 1982, the �ietropolitan Council consi� Dakota County HRA tax-exempt mortgage bond revenue plan far the Cii Eagan, West St, Paul and Mendota Heights. This cansideration was.t repart of the Fiuman Resources Cammittee, Referral Report No. 82-13: this report, which was adapted as presented, is attached. �V�t�ir�,%FJ��i��r'�i 1 : �w��..:� �;:� iV18Srn �r��,•a;�,, c;�.!'It?'til� n�IZ i�nci i:�i.�r,�ri ;;$r�:;�.;15 Paul, Minn�sota 5510"� Teic�,honc� (b12} 291•b35�) �red the i es of ased on a . A �capy of The Council finds that given Mendota Heights' recognition that cha ges are necessary in the hausi�g element of its cor�preher�sive plan and its co�nmit�ent to proceed with such revisions, the mor�gage revenue bond plan for Eagan, 4Jest St. Paul and Mendota Neights, as currently submi�ted, is consisten with the Council's Housing Bond Plan Review Guidelines. The Council has directed the housing staff to affer assis�ance ta 1 Mendota Heights in the City's efforts to revise the hausing elemen' cornprehensive plan to address �he issue of f air share housing respc and housing affordability consistent with regional hausing policy. Sincerely, METROPOL.ITAN COUfilCIL �..�r��,�--.-- � GA.i.� Charles R. b!eaver ' Ghair�nan � CR41: dh � Attachment � cc. Thomas T. Feeney, Area Manager, FfUO Thomas Hedges, Administrator, City of Eagan 4rvil Johnson, Admir�istrator, City of M�ncioia Neig��ts t.i Thomas Noban, Planager, City of West St. Paul Guy Peterson, �letropolitan Gouncil Staff r�.r� ! :i...� L�i � ..'it.:i�t� tifi'��,�: �,. . 12 c; ty Or of i ts zsibilities t. . . ti . ° / •' % For Release 12.9.82 - 4:00 p`:�m: `"' �-• � Bus. I ' M E T R O P O L I T A N C O U N C I L Suite 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota � ' REPORT OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE ' REFERRAL REPORT NO. 82-133 To: Metropolitan Council Subject:, Mortgage Revenue Bond Plan - Dakota County H � the Cities of Eagan, West St. Paul, and Mend � Heights, Referral 10845-1 Date: I; December 8, 1982 ; At its r,ieeting of December 6, 1982, the Human Resources discussed the attached staff report and recommendations to the subject mortgage revenue bond plan. Recommendations �� 5101 A for ta Committee related That the Council concur in the following staff recommen ations: 1) Given Mendota Heights' recognition that changes are necessary in the housing element of its comprehensive plan an its com- mitment to proceed with such revisions, the mortgag revenue bond plan for Eagan, West St. Paul and Mendota Heig ts, as currently submitted, is consistent with the Council's Housing Bond Plan Review Guidelines; and 2) That housing staff be directed to offer assistance t of Mendota Heights in the City's efforts to revise t element of its comprehensive plan to address the iss share housing responsibilities and housing affo�dab� � sistent with regional housing policy. � � � Respectfully submitted, Roger Scherer, Chair lg attach. ; ; � the City e housing e of fair ity con- \ MEMORANDUM� T0: FROM: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Suite 300 Metro Square Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55 Human R�esources Committee Guy D. Peterson Novembe� 30, 1982 SUBJECT: ; MORTGAGE REVENUE BOND PLAN - DAKOTA COUNTY HRA � FOR THE CITIES OF EAGAN, WEST ST. PAUL AND MENDOTA HE REFERRAL FILE N0. 10845-1 _ � COUNCIL DISTRICT N0. 15 I I. AUTHORITY TO REVIEW The Council has received from the Dakota County HRA a tax-exem revenue bond plan prepared by the Cities of Eagan, West St. Pa Mendota Heights pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C. is required by this law to review and comment on such bond pla consistency with local and regional housing policies and needs day review period expires on December 29, 1982. Following Council review, the HRA will submit the bond plan an to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for its approval. MHF employ the criteria set forth in the law to select from progra those that will be authorized to issue mortgage revenue bonds. may issue more than $10 million of $27.5 million in bonding au is expected to be available for municipalities in 1983. II. BOND PROGRAM SUMMARY The Dakota County HRA proposes to issue between $7 and $10 mil exempt mortgage revenue bonds to provide betweeen $6.5 and $9. for below market interest rate loans for the purchase of homes West St. Paul and Mendota Heights. The balance of the bond pr additional non-bond proceeds will be used to fund required res pay the cost of issuance. The non-bond proceeds may consist o contributions from participating orginators, developers and se well as a contribution by the cities such as tax increment fun Thougfi presentTy it is undetermined as� to exactly how much of fund will be available in each of the three cities, it is expe approximately on,e-third of the total proceeds. At current bon conditions, the cities would anticipate being able to provide interest rate of between 10.5 and 11.5 percent for between 110 home loans depending upon the size of the bond issue. iIGHTS �t mortgage �1 and The Council �s for their . The 45- program will s statewide No city hority that� ion in tax- million in Eagan, ceeds and rves and lers as :he loan :ted to be i market � mortgage and 155 This mortgage revenue bond program is part of a"rollover" housing effort by the three cities involved. The homes for which loans are made through � the program may be either newly constructed or existing units, however, at present�it is estimated that one half to two-thirds of the loan fund may . ( be reserved for a resale commitment to the developers of a new senior ' citizen development in Mendota Heights. In this f ashion,�ihe program will provide a pool of home loan dollars at a below-market interest rate available to first-time home buyers to purchase homes of empty-nesters in these three communities that want to'move into the new development. For the first six months of the program all_of the mortgage loans will'be made available to persons and families with;adjusted gross incomes of no more than $25,168. 'At the end of this period, any remaining funds may be used for loans by households with incomes up to $31,460, and up to 20 percent of the loan fund, if still available, may be used in Mendota Heights for loans to mortgagors without regard to income. This exception for Mendota Heights occurs because the entire city has been designated as a development district and now qualifies as a Target Area. The maximum purchase price limits are $75,600 for existing homes, $94,380 for new homes and $102,520 for new homes in the Target Area. Given the income limit, for at least the first six manths of the program, the price of homes purchased through the loan fund will likely be considerably less than the program's price limits. The HRA indicates that at present the median sales price in N4endota Heights and West St. Paul is $75,650 while in Eagan it is $78,000. It would thus appear that nearly one half of the existing homes sold in these communities are within the program limits. In targeting a11 of the loans to households below the median income for six months, the cities may achieve at least-a portion of both their ten- -�. year low- and moderate-income and modest-cost housing responsibilities. The program provides a tool by which all three cities can offer a housing aTternative for their elderly and empty-nest households through the seniors' condominium development while enhancing the marketability of a significant portion of�these units. It will also help the three communities provide affordable home ownership for younger, first time homebuyers. Public sale of the revenue bonds is not expected before Spring of 1983. III. ISSUES RELATIVE TO MENOOTA HEIGHTS In November, 1980 the Metropolitan Council found the housing element of Mendota Heights' comprehensive plan inconsistent with the Housing Chapter of the Metropolitan Development Guide. The plan did not have policies or numerical goaTs regarding the provision of low- and moderate-income housing opportuni�ies nor did it set forth an implementation strategy by which such objectives could be accomplished. In preparing their portion of this housing bond plan, however, Mendota Heights has taken the housing element of their comprehensive plan and added housing policies which recognize the potential need for low- and moderate-income housing in Mendota Heights for families and the elderly. Tnese policies call for continued cooperation with the Dakota County HRA to provide low- and moderate-income housing and consideration for the use of federal, state and local resources to provide such housing. `-- 2 �, IV. The bond plan, unlike the housing element of the comprehensiv forth'an implementation program outlining the housing assista been and continues to be provided in Mendota Heights, as well .descri�ption��of;both: single family and multifamily housing rev progr.ams. Most importantly, however, it indicates�the recogn will be to the city's "benefit and advantage to pursue the ne revisions"_to:the�housing element.of its.comprehensive�plan t these;housing�affordability issues. . • � � '.. �. ..... , . , ' . . . . . �Though a specific timetable.for such revisions�is not present plan,indicates that�such changes would be appropriately made conjunction;with other comprehensive plan revisions�that are following resolution of the airport noise,and land use compat planning issue now •before the Counci.l. • .. SUMMARY OF REVIEW FINDINGS .; • � plan,- sets ce that has as a � nue bond . t i�on th at i t essary deal'with d,• the bond n ,. o be made bility 1. The housing bond plan includes all information required by�law and necessary for Metropolitan Council review. � . 2. The bond plan provides examples of the maximum purchase pr income levels can support and offers estimates regarding t number of mortgages expected to be financed. 3. This.housing revenue bond effort is�consistent with the ho policies set forth in the Eagan and West St. Paul comprehe however, West St. Paul should amend the implementation str forth in its comprehensive plan to more specifically incor type of revenue bond program. � 4. Though�the Mendota Heights comprehensive plan has no polici the-provision of more affordable housing, this bond plan no forth policies and implementation�activities to accomplish indicates that these types of revisions to its comprehensiv necessary.. � : - _ ,. �.,. . . . • . . 5. The bond program is a tool which may help the cities achiev of�their ten-year fair share low- and moderate-income and n cost housing responsibilities. . certain total ing ive plans, egies set rate this s regarding on ly sets uch, but p 1 an are a portion modest- 6. The program will not result in the concentration of home lolans in any one area of any of the cities. V. RECOMMENDATIONS � 1. Given Mendota Heights' recognition that changes are necessa housing element of its comprehensive plan and its commitmen with such rev..isions, the mortgage revenue bond plan for Eag St. Paul and"Mendota Heights, as currently submitted, is co with the Council's Housing Bond Plan Review Guidelines. 2. That housing staff be directed to offer assistance to the C Mendota Heights in the City's efforts to revise the housing its comprehensive plan to address the issue of fair share h responsibilities and housing affordability consistent with housing policy. 3 y in the � to proceed n, West sistent i ty of element of �using •egional PLAN CONTENT REQUIREMENTS- . � All information.r�quired�by��law and necessaryyfor Council•review has-been� submitted with this �plan including the housing element of the City's - f comprehensive plan.: • • • - � •� Though the bond plan does not identify the income levels and the number of units at each level to be served by the bond program; it does�include specific examples of the maximum purchase price that can be supported by particular income• levels at different• interest rates and down payments. It also indicates that according to the_Dakota County Board of�Realtors, durin� the first nine , months of 1982 the median home sales price was $75,650 in West St. Paul and Mendota Heights and $78,000 in Eagari. It is anticipated that 110 to 155 mortgages may be made through this loan fund depending upon the amount of the bond issue. In making all of the mortgage money available to households at 80 percent of the program limit ($25,168) for the first six months, the Cities have more than adequately complied with the requirement of the law that at least one half of the loan funds be targeted.to incomes at 90 percent of the program 7imit during its first six months. The HRA intends to contract with a program administrator for monitoring of program implementation. The administrator will submit monthly reports to the HRA during the origination period showing the income and family composition of the mortgagors, their former place of residence and type of unit they moved from. ' � BOND PLAN REI.ATIONSHIP TO CITY AND REGIONAL HOUSING POLICIES The mortgage reirenue bond program proposed in �his bond plan is consistent with�' � the housing objectives and policies set forth in the housing elements of Eagan's and West St. Paul's comprehensive plans which were reviewed by the Metropolitan Council in January and June of 1982 respectively. The Mendota Heights plan reviewed in November, 1980 did not address the issue of housing affordability. � This bond program may help Eagan and West St. Paul achieve a portion of their low- and moderate-income and new modest-cost�housing opportunities goals for 1990 and provide the type of affordable homeownership on a scattered city-wide basis called for in their comprehensive plans:�'Though housing maintenance is not cur.rently a major concern to any of the three cities, the program offers a means of "rolling over" existing housing to younger households who may be financially and physically better able to care for a home, and thus provide one avenue by which existing housing may, if necessary, be improved or renovated by its new owners. The bond plan is cons,istent with regional housing policies, particularly Policy 81 which calls upon communities that use housing revenue bonds to do so in an effort to meet their share of the areawide need for low- and moderate-income and modest-cost housing. This bond effort also supports regional policy which calls for the expansion of alternative forms of home ownership and encourages diversification of housing type. This may occur if new units are purchased through this loan fund or the fact that, at least in part, the program will enhance the feasibility of the new condominium development to be built in Mendota Heights. The plan is also consistent with regional housing policy which indicates that the housing opportunities afforded by such programs be � affirmatively marketed to all potential consumers and producers. 4 Of these three cammunities, only Eagan has a comprehensive plan wi implementation program which.s.ets forth this type of housing reven � program as an�activity by which io provide affordable.housing oppo � West St. Pau1 should amend the implementatian section of ,its compr '•. plan's housing element ta specifically inc3ude this type of fiscal Mendota Heights recagnizes that revisians to its plan must include ,. this and other'��implementation activities, but also hous,ing. goals a regarding the,pravisian of affordable hausing.. 5uch changes must; be undertaken pursuant°to the Metropolitan CoUncil's plan 'amendmen , ..,. . . . - . . ... .. _ ar.�:r . . ., • . • . _ NOUSING��NEEDS, TYPE AND COST TO SE SERVEQ BY THE PROGRAM ''`� . At the�A"rea's current�median income, this martgage revenue bond pr for at least its first six months be serving households with gross incomes not �xceeding $25,168. Thaugh the'purchase price limits f and new �ousing are $75,6Q0 and $94,380 respectively, ihe program provide mortgage loans for units priced belaw these limits. Examp indicates that with; a�five percent down payment and an 11 percent rate,�typica7 families purchasing homes through the program wiil b purchase prices in the law 60's and will make monthly payments of $750. If the purchaser makes a 20 percent downpayn►ent {Example 2} will be able to purchase a home in the low 70's. � • If loan funds remain avaiiable after the first six manths, househo adjusted incames as high as $31,460 will be able to purchase highe units.� Examples 3 and 4 show that at an II percent inierest rate percent down the units can be priced in the high 70's and with.20 irt the 1ow 80's. If a maximum af $2.0 millian af a$IO million lo used for Target Area loans in Mendata Heights, the program may pro 20 and 25 laans for units priced at the Target"Area limit. This mortgage revenue bond pragram is a vehicle through which housi presentiy underutilized by empty-nesters and the elderly can be "ro ta younger fami 1 ies whi le affording the former awners, an alternativ option.. ' � A1I types of rea3 praperty are eligible under the pragrar�t and there available for new housing in all three corr�nunities. It's likely, h most loans from the program will�be for,existing housir►g. -. � CONCENiRATION OF t1NITS h a hausing e bon d tunities. hen s i ve • device. � not anly d� policies 0� ' GOUt"S� s guidelines. The fact that three car�munities are participating in the band pragr likelihood that most of the loans provided through the program will existing housing, considerably reduces the likelihood of a concentr the laan fund on units �n any one area of the three cities. The NR monitor the monthly progress reports provided by the program admini ensure iha� this does not become a problem. LS520a gram �wi 11 ad3usied r'�existing i11 iikely el nterest� limited to pproximately he or she s with priced th f i ve rcent down fund is de between g that �i s led over" housing isjiand wever, that ; :��-� F > un and th� be for ited use of t wili �trator to • � .. - � Example 1-: . . � ..' . , - • �' ' �� . , ., . . � • ., �--- . ` . . , . �< : , . , . _ , , : :,.. � - , ' � .INTEREST RATE - 11� " r � :,' ' �. ..Family Size � ' DOWN PAYMENT - 5% :' ," '., , ' , : � ,. , -- � • � � • �,. 2 Adults. �� - � � ' � � � 2 Adi�lts � 1 Chi ld , . � . , Gros s Income . . .- . �- $ 26, 668 � : $ 27,168 , . , r . . . ,. .., ...._ . .. . ... . _ . - Adjusted Gross Income . � . $.2,5,168 ,,-�; . . $ 25,168 . Principal Interest Taxes � � .- �, ' , and Insurance . . $ 733.37 � • $ry747.12 Insurance - - . - $ 121.23 $ 123.50 Taxes , - _ $ 58.74 $ 52.60 Principal and Interest $ 533.40 $ 571.02 Mortgage � �• � 58,111 $ 59,961 Purchase Price � $ 61,169 � $ 63,117 INTEREST RATE - 11� DOWN PAYMENT = 20% Gross Income � . Adjusted Gross Income Principal Interest Taxes and Insurance Insurance Taxes � Principal and Interest Mortgage Purchase Price Example 2 _ 2 Adults $ 26,668 $ 25,168 $ 733.37 $ I37.80 $ 58 74 $ 536.83 $ 56,871 � 71,089 0 Family Size 2 Adults 1 Chi ld $ 27,168 $ 25,168 � 747.12 $ 140.38 � 59.84 $ 546.89 � 57,427 � 71,784 - - 2 Adults 2 Children . ,$ 27, 668 $. 25;�168 $ 760.87` $ 125.77 $ . 53.57� � 581.53 $ 61,064 _ $ 64,278 2 Adults 2 Children $ 27,668 $ 25,168 $ 760.87 $ 142.97 $ 60.95 $ 556.96 $ 58,484 $ 73,105 � �, � �, ; - .� Example 3 �• ' ' � ' . ; �, _ '. ' - :' �:- . . ` ' • � . INTEREST RATE = 11%�.� � . - �=;'�Fami ly Si ze . � DOWN PAYMENT•,-, 5�-. � - �� . `. ,; � � " � �2 Adults �' � " � �' '`��2`Adults 1 Child ' � . j.a:' . . - n � , �. .. i ' . . , - Gross. Income�' :°�-� �.�='=�.s$' 32,960 � 33,460 , , . . " , . Adjusted Gross •Income • � :',� $ 31,460 � 31,460 , . . • Principal Interest Taxes . �.. 2 dults 2 C ildre $ 3,960 � � � � 1,460 and Insurance $ 906.40 $ 920.15 $ 33.90 Insurance � $ 149.83 $ 152.10 $ 54.37 Taxes � $ 63.81 $ 54.78 $ 65.75 Principal and Interest $ 692.76 $ 703.27 $ 13.78 Mortgage $ 72,744 $ 73,849 , $ 4,951 Purchase Price $ 76,573* $ 77,736* $ 8,896* *Exceeds the'maximum allowable price_for existing houses. � . INTEREST �ATE - 11� OOWN PAYMENT;- 20� , Gross Income Adjusted Gross Income Principal Interest Taxes and Insurance Insurance : Taxes Principal and Interest Mortgage Purchase Price Example 4 2 Adults $ 32,960 $ 31,460 $ 906.40 � 170.31 $ 72.60 � 663.48 $ 69,670 $ 87,088* Farrri 1y Si ze 2 Adults 1 Child 3 33,460 � $ 31,460 $ 920.15 $ 172 90 $ 73.70 � 673.55 $ 70,727 $ 88,409* *Exceeds the maximum allowable price for existing houses. , � , 2 �dults 2 Children $ 3 ,960 � 3 ,460 � 9 3.90 � 1 5.48 � 4.81 � 6 3.61 $ 7 ,783 $ 8 ,729* rii.a�l0 DATE. December 29, ].982 T0: City Council FRO�*f: Paul R. Berg Code �.nfarcement Officer ' SU�JECT: Bui].di.nq Activity Report for December, ].982 _ CUR£2ENT �;ONTH � --� XEAR TO DATE - 198z NC3. VAI,tJ�1TI0N FEE CQLLECTFD NO. VALUATION FEE COLLECTED $s.,DG PE'Ra4SI`I'S � ~ Sf'D 1 $114,649.47 $ 776.33 67 $ 6,746,562.84 $39,864.73 C/I 2 3,OQ0.00 48.5Q 25 3,778,371.Q4 18,340.48 �IISC. � 42,903.$8 540.79 154 905,229,54 9,952.23 Sub Total 7 $160,553.35 $1,365.62 246 $11,430,163.38 $68,157.44 �r�.� ?F�r�zTs �1.hc� 5 bVtr 4 Swr 5 Htg, AfC & Gas Pipe 6 Sub Tota1 ZO LZCE?SS IIdG Contractor's LS.censes `� $ I15.00 20.00 87,5Q 292.50 $ 515.00 $ 225.OQ T(7TAL 36 $160,553.35 $2,105.62 55 58 52 $2 247 $ 1,782.00 440.00 985.00 6,693.50 $ 9,900.50 246 $ 6,150.OQ ', 739 �$11,430,163.38 $$4,207.94 YEAR T(J DATE - 1981 N0. VALUATION FEE COiLEC'�'ED 48 $4,62$,635.73 $31,9$�.33 21 3,273,797.02 15,732.93 179 1,192,192.19 15,868.1.4 24$ $9,099,624.94 $63,58$.36 5$ 53 62 82 255 252 $ 1,379.00 373.00 996.50 3,533.OQ $ 6,281.50 $ 6,275.00 754 $9,094,624.9�} $76,144.$6 � � D - a v � r �'..� ,Su�.g� � . / /� 3 �.�' ovPr �63 ,E'.sf` ?vOTE: Al1 fee arnoun�s exclude Sac, Wac and State Surcharge. Amoun�.s shown will reflect only perrnit, plan check fee and valuation amounts. .; rir 37.96� 37.98 *� 143.�J 9 143.J 9 *� �NECK REGISTER VEN003 KAPLAN f3ROS LA FR ANCE EaUIP Q x�t /D - Hd,rn t n 20 - Police 15 - Ei�gr 30 - Fire 40 - Cde Enf ITEM DES�RIPTION COVERALLS COAT � s Acp� SA - al �t mc-�.alges � 60 - tilities � . 70 - arks ' 80 - lanning �1'q 90 - nimal Control ; ACC UNT N0. INV. # � a�- oio-oQo-flo ii�s� -- � fli- Q10-�.4Q.-(iQ Q�i=3Ci8 90 .3 a. MINN ST FD ASSN 19830 U=S d I- 4�.�#-�.3) - 3� ' . . 9 � ._� -� :--t � ..._- ----------_ _ - - � _ __...- --- - ---- _. _ ___ -- --- - -- - --- - - � 137�42 N S P GAS SVC RPR EMENDWTR 15- �1Q-)DDrQn C1I64 137.42 * � . ___�.. _ .-_ - .- -- -_ _ -- - - -- - -- - . i 48.3.3 STO BLOG �IATI. SiIICA SAND OI- 3�.5-�7�,*7Q. 53I�12 48.D0 _+�� d -- -----. .._ ... ______. _ _ __------ -.- - _- --- . .._--_ ______ � 93.24 VIKING EL�C SPLY ELBOU&&CONN I5- 010-3,O�r'Jti.21466 ..._93.24- '-`-� � - -- - --- - - - - - # a8+7�R M P C A SEMINAR T I�Nt1TH �5- 40D-105-15 .__4 8 . �_+_3__ # � ' - - ---------- - -- -�--- - - -- ---__.-- -------- � - ----_.--- - - -- -.... - - -- - - � 348.6� POUCFtER PRTG BD PRTG 12- 01�-�.G�; QL� 85866 348,5J *� ? _-- - - - --- - - - - ' - -- ---- - ------- - � a 3 ,_._----•---•------____ ._._-------------- - - --- - -- ----• ---- — - _... _-- --. . _._ _ .. _. .. ...---- --- - .- .. 42.ID AIR COMM INC JAN CONTR L�1�- 330-45�r2� 82121 42.1 � *� i ; � ---------- - -. _.. .- -------.�_ _.—_------------- - --- - - -- -- � 108.�5 BbJ AUTO SPLY BATTERIt'S/CORE O1- 010-�0.��-a0 47142 _. _____.._..._____..-._._—_- -- - ---- _ _-- ---- - - -- -�----- ---- - --- --_ _. ._ __.�..�---- ---- ... _ _. __... 10 8.45 *� ------- - ----- - -�-- - s � f �_.^�_-' _ __ �...�_.».'_"_.__..^_"____�-�._ ._'�_ _____._._._'. �.___-_' "__'.� ^_.. ._ _ -._-_ __._" .'.' _ '._. � 128.58 BO I�AT�R CONMISSION �iATER USE I5- 425-470�60 22730 128.E18" *� _ ___.__......_- ------ �- ---- �� --- -� -- - � . , i ; _ , 14.�8 CART�R BOB �'ORD INC MOTOR �1- �1Q-O.Or.-OC 80.448 14.48 * ♦ e � 3 , i 21.4� CITY NOTOR SUPPLY OUPONT 41- U1Q-7.0�; : f� :6961 45.55 CITY MOi'0� SIfPPLY MISC PARTS s3i- 010-1.03-'.3^ 16961 31.59 CITY MOTOR SUPPLY PARTS �.i- 31 D-)A�-J �l I6937' ?" 85 CITY Mi�TOR SUPPLY TAPE/THIyNER 15- t110-J.UDri�� 1695II 1 3 9 +� � ' 2.85 COPY E�UI� CO UtILU �S- �LO-��7,-�0 4685!3 0 i CHECK REGISTER M�UNT _ ^_�__^_ VENDOR_._ 38.68 COPY E�UIP CO ___.__92.50v...____.----_ CDPY .E�UIP_..CO 134.13 *� � v : i J � _____..._._ITEM D�S�RIP TI ON_ _ACCOUNT N0. I NV.� MISC SP�YS 5-2II10-�.Q?-0.0 �6 _.-------- -- MISC... SPL.YS_ _ _......_..__.- - _3-43��5-�03-��! . 46 � , ---- .�- - -�-----... ._..---�-- - --___._�__�_.__...____. —_..---_.-__.._______.��. �---�------- - �-- -. .. - ---- --- ------.___ _.�__._... ___ # 420.�,� OAHL6REN HOIiARO ASSO NQV TA EXTRAS Ol-2n10-�.6�-Q,0- S�T _ 1�,18.3.�3�J.�__.� DAHLGREN__HO{�ARD_ASSO__`___NOY_R.ETAINER_._.__.__,_____...____._Q1�201Qs�S:�_�y�:tl.__ST 1�520.�.8 DAHLGREN N41fyAftD ASSO NOV RE AIRPORT NOISE p1-2010rQ00-00 ST 3� 123.� g *� � � _ .__ _ _ ._ _.__._____ _---------- - - - - -� -- - - -� �- --- -� - - -- - --- -- _, _ ._ 1 _...1_t.T62,.5�J.�_...--------OCR_C ORP. _- - --- 1,17Q.3!? bGR CQRP. 2�932.5I3 */ __...____�9it.Q.�--------------QENN.IS DELMONT 9i�.�.0 *i ?13.12 GOODYEAR SERVICE STR -�1-3'i 2- *��---------------- _—.___-__—_----�--- s � � ------.JA fV _R EN T .---_- .. - -- -- - -_.. _ .. �1.1".9_2� 0_- 64.i�� .1.4. ; JAN RENT Q5-42Q.�-60D-15 , ___JA N M I __. i i - - - - -- ---- - ------ --- �- --- � � � ----- -. _..----- a.1-�a.1_5-�Z��29 , - - - -- ----- - -- - - � TIRES /3A LANC ING US-2010-0.00-Q 0 19 ; �.- - - --------- -- --- _..---- ---. __.___.._._�...��_---�- • 175.3.3 ------- JOHlVS ON �ORI►I L-�._-------____..--- JAN--MI -- -- 175.'� 4.. *� � – - -___.._.._.---•- -- —. _ ,. ___ ! D1-44I5-110-10 ; � ..---- -._�. _ ___._ .__-------�----- - -� � . . � _- --- 55�94_._.___� KAR PRODUCTS _INC.-_--- -�--MISC.._PARTS .__._._._---------.----.-.-- Oi�2Cil0�OD9.�OQ �_ 55.94 KAR PRODt1CTS INC. MZSC PARTS Q.1-2a,i0-0.�D-.Q.Q. � 55.94 KAR PRODUCTS INC. MISC PARTS 15-20�,0-OA��.tiA • ------167 .8_2_._±� ..__. � �_..___—_ ------------- ____ _------ ..... _- ---._.._------- . __..._----- ._..__ _—._.______-. � 24.12 LANGULA HD1iE 24.12 */ 135.� � LELS 135.'?.? *'� 2�,9�1.27 METRO 4�AST� CONTROL 2C+.901.27 *� MISC SPLYS JAN UD JAN I NST i J __ - � l71-2010-O,O�rQO 20 � � - - - # i 01-2075-I.0]rOQ + � , Y � � 15-4449-�6�-60 15 � � e r � � i i 1 �OUNT CHECK REGISiER _ VENDOR____._ _ ______ __..--- _--ITEM _DESCR IP.TI.ON-. --.. ,_�__86.3 5__�`_ MOTpR U�,_A_� NC _PA RTS /S VC _ 86.35 *T ----_�.__� 144.66 NOR7HER:N ST P041ER CO DEC SVC I4�.66 *� , 262.69 NORTti1�ESTERN BELL 37.77 NflRTM1�ESTERN BE�L _ 47.35 _ _ NORTH yEST�R N �3ELL 3T.77 NORTI�NESTERN BELL 233.6�J fVORTHUESTERN B�LI 23.64 NORTH WESTERN BELL 52.31 �� NORTt�UEST�RN BELL 3T.77 NORTI�SiESTERN B£LL 2.62 NORTF#�ESTERN BELL 735.22 *� 5.0 � 2 .52 4.23. a.2p. 12.6'�,. _ 2.52. •.3 9 4.2� =. 35.67 * S&T OFFICE PROD S�T�FICE PR'OD S&T OFFICE PROD S&T OFFICE PRQD SB�T OFFICE PROD S&T OFFZCE PR00 SbT QFFICE �PROD SbT OFF�CE PROD --_.__..._... DEC S VC -----�---- DEC S WC _�_ DEC S VC_.__._.__._.___. �DEC S VC DEC S YC -------- DEC S VC.- ------- DEC S VC QEC S VC nFr_ c �r 83DESK CAL SCHED 83 DESK�CAL SCHE 830ES K C A L S CHED 830ESK CAl SCHED 830ESK CAL SCHED 83DES.K CAl SCHED CHALK 83DESK CAL SCHED 35.'J D:, SELANDER DUA NE C JAN HI 35.�.�... *� _.___...---------- -�.�.�_ .._ ._-�-�- ._._...___--�- -._ ...-----------...--- - �- - ----�----- 1 r 230.�3 D SM AUG HNESSY L E JR DEC S VC 2r23fi.3ti */ 28.SQ SHIELDS GAS&ELECTRZC - -� - - -- - - .__. _ - -------- 2 8 . 5 0 * / - -- - ... _ _. 5.7� SNYO�R DRJG STOR�S 5.74 « � SVC CALL MARIc AV MI SC SPLYS 1-2010-000r. fl 4 ' 1-202D-�O.DQ,rt10 ; i�2010-��t�D_ _._ � 1-2DiDr�7A3-t1Q { 1-2D1Q-0.O��Ot� � i-2Q10-U�QJ-O._0 -- a 5-2010-)D1-L�. � 5-201•�-�OAtlr.O� � .7-2D1_0-0�I�-i�II---- ►. � Y � "'_ '�_ '�._._-T�_ "' _' + .., � 1- �3fl�-��2fls 2t} , 60,7 1- �3�.�+0 Ai��A__B� J 1-432Ar. �,5i.-50. 80.,7 1-43��Q-07��Tt1 B0.7 1-43JA-11J -1Q.. BQ�.� 5-431A-lt15�'15 BJ:7 5-4.3�,0-:1'0��:�.15 BO.T 5-43Q�fl-D.69.-6D. BD.� i , ___.,. . .� .. O 1-44i 5-2D3-�0. ' .____.. ._._�.____ �__� � d a ----01-201Q-s�A3-�Q � � _._.._.... ._... _ _ .. .... � � � i a1-4268-)7�-70 STM - - , � i _ _ . _ � � -43]S-�3)r3fi 67�' x 9 ; . _ . � i � MOU N CHECK REGIStER V�NOflR_.�...,.�_.___._.�.�.,.---- �TEM___DES�,RIPTION._____.._,.__._ CCOUNT, N0._ FNV..�; _ .._.._ � 99 .9 b_ � ST i' R �,A'S P �ft A ___ _.--- �'� �?A -- 2-? j 2 �.� .g.R .____,.�..._......�..__ �1r110.T2 ST TREAS P�ERA PERA 12/lp. PR �8.61 ST iREAS PERA PERA 221L�t PR 290.64 ST TR£AS PERA PERA 12/1�..PR ___._._ i 5. 5��_._.__.__ S T. TR gA'S ` P ER A_...._ __._... __ - pE RA i 211 ti �. P!� ._._,._—.....,,_.__....' �#4?.9Q., ST TR��1S„PERA . PERA 12l1it�PR 1��<{12� ST ' TR�A S' P�R� _�_ P� R� 1= /� Q.� P lg _.____.___.. I� 751.s5 ST TREAS PERA PERA iilH 32113�. PR 24i1.31 ST TREAS P�RA PERA 12/1�,.PR 69.38 ST TR�AS PERA PERA 1212(f PR _._.._._— .__..—_...__ ..�..�_.._� 4�28�.79 *l -._--.._._.------------.__._---..._..____.__.. 7.97 SUN NEUSPAPERS PU8 HEAR PERMIT t�OME 6.10;. SUN NE1�5QAPERS PUB HEAR MF6 HS6 � 2#.ti�T � � _.._._ �__�...__.._-___._.---.----- 125.�Q llNIi�D �}AY-ST PAUL 125.1,A� *f JAN C OHTR 1 .i30.� 4 Fi�ND O1 TOTAL. --1,55�.76 FtJfVD 05 TtiTAL �. 348.60. FUND 12 TOTAL 21t�#4$.95 FUND 15 TOTAL � 2.62 FUND "�T TOTAL � ��^�� 9��60�, �'1lND 83 Tt�.TAI. 35�9T7.� TOTAL MANUEL CHECKS 1,0189 � - $679.78 � n� an a �� Hugo �lackenfe],ner Net Payroll Terry Blum Double ti.me pay not 10191 22.60 A1ver Freeman MN L& S 10192 200.00 Dakota Cty St Bank PR ded (12/24) � 1.0193 ___ .580�00 State Cap Cr Union PR ded {12/24) _ .. .. __.___.._._._._ _.--.- - -- --- - -- -_... _ -. . ___.._._ .___....._ _..__ _. ._. _ 10194 12.00 ICBO Copy of Unif Bldg Cade IdI95 15.38 3ahn Neska 1 hr. standby pay {1.j3j82} @ ,. _... 10196_-.-_--_�___ 7µ50___,_ Joan .Frank _.._ Electa.pn Judge time 11-2-82 10197 7.50 Marjarie Cheesebrow Electa.on Judge time 11-2-82 1,534.51 _ _ _ _ _. _ _ .._.. __---_ -- - $37,512.0$ GRAND TOTAL �..-.� � � � -;i,u� �� v.�s__ . � 1-2010-.O�OQ-O-0 � 1-2Q1fl-�,ft�:-0£� � I-201_0:-�d�D-Ai} ..._� 1-2010�J�t�� 4 . ; 1-2010».D��tl.� � #,�!��•�A �__ � 1-20b2•:3i��tii3 a 5-2i1i0s0A0-.@0. � rt��itit nri:i�a..i��i ' . , # 1.-2V 1 OT�iD�TM'� I3 . r"JI 1-2�10-a,0�-AD._ 51 . . V . .�_._._._.._ __ ,- 1-2t}70-Q.OQ�fl� 1.5, not previausly 2 @ 3.75 unrecorded 2 @V3.75 �unrecorded � ; 1983 CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES I'OR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL - JANUARY 4`I'HJ 19F33 - T-- Andretta Brothers Concrete License Theisen-Fischer, Inc. Concrete License Husting & Engstrom, Inc. Excavating License Red Rock Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc. Gas Piping License Suburban Heating and Air Conditioning Gas Piping License Ken Anderson Construction General Contractor's Licen e Bjorklund Construction Company, Inc. General Contractor's Licen e Gilbert Hamm Construction Company General Contractor's Licen e Masterpiece Kitchens & Construction Co. General Contractor's Licen e North Star Services General Contractor's Licen e Sheehy Construction Company General Contractor's Licen e Timberline Builders, Inc. General Contractor's Licen e Valley Investments General Contractor's Licen e Central Air Conditioning & Heating Co. Heating and Air Conditioni g Horwitz, Inc. Heating and Air Conditioni g Red Rock Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc. Heating and Air Conditioni g Rouse Mechanical, Inc. Heating and Air Conditioni g Suburban Heating and Air Conditioning Heating and Air Conditioni g 1983 CIGARETTE SALE LICENSES FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL Economics Laboratory, Inc. Somerset Country Club 1983 RUBBISH HAULING LICENSES FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL A A Rubbish Service, Inc. Marv's Disposal Roadway Rubbish Triangle Rubbish Service License License License License License r� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: City Council FROM: Orvil J. Johnson City Administrator December 30, 1982 SUBJECT: Park and Recreation Commission TeZms of Expiration The terms of two members of the Park and Recreation Commission expire on January 31, 1983. These members are Gary Gustafson and D McMonigal. � 1 Reappointments or new appointments should be considered at the J�nuary 18th City Council meeting or no later than February l, 1983. , 0 See reverse side for current Roster. � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEMBERS NAME ADDRESS CHAIRMAN: Thomas Bayless 738 Navajo Lane VICE-CHAIRMAN: J�mes Stein 1752 James Rd. SECRETARY: Robert Doffing 1900 Twin Circle Dr. Gary Gustafson 1423 Cherry Hill Rd. Mike Williams 2357 Rogers Avenue Dorothy McMonigal 703-2nd Avenue Mary Jeanne Schneeman 792 Upper Colonial Dr. APPOINTED 2/1/82 2/1/81 9/15/81 2/1/80 2/1/82 2/1/80 2/1/81 , EXPIRE5 1/31/85 1/31/84 1/31/84 1/31/83 1/31/85 1/31/83 1/31/84 � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: City Council FROM: Orvil J. Johnson City Administrator December 30, 1982 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Terms of Expiration There are three members of the Planning Commission whose terms ill expire on January 31, 1983. They are Cameron Kruse, Joseph Stefani and Wil iam Burke. Reappointments or new appointments should be considered at the �anuary 18th Council meeting or no later than February l, 1983. • ' See reverse side for current roster. � NAME . CHAIRPERSON: Cameron Kruse VICE-CHAIRPERSON: Janet Blesener Joseph Stefani Jerome Morson William Burke John Frank Sandra Butler CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ADDRESS APPOINTED 902 Cheri Lane 1/31/80 1818 Twin Circle Drive 1/31/81 1820 Valley Curve Rd. 1/31/80 1442 Wachtler 7/20/82 707 Decorah Lane 1/31/80 774 Lower Colonial Dr. 1/31/81 734 Woodridge Drive 1/31/82 EXPIRES • 1/31/83 1/31/84 1/31/83 1/31/85 1/31/83 1/31/84 1/31/85 December 22, 1982 T0: FROM: SUBJECT: Orvil J. Johnson City Administrator Dennis J. Delmont Chief of Police Mobile Radio Replacement There is $8,000 in the Capital Improvement Budget for the replacement of squad car radios; $4,000 for 1983 and another $4,000 for 1984. I assume figures were used for Motorola or General Electric radios, the most expe available. I have researched the market and found that a new synthesize the "Citi-Com Plus" by Wilson Radio, represents the state-of-the-art in tions and is available at a very reasonable price at the present time. solicited informal quotes from three reputable dealers which resulted in following prices for six (6) Citi-Com Plus radios and installation. Mobile Radio Eng. $3,540 Capital Electronics $3,300 Nelson $2,640 our present that these sive radio, ommunica- have the All three dealers made these observations. I� unanticipated problems dev�lop in installation, the price may go up by $120 to $150 total. A linear ampli ier may be needed to boost signal strength - cost $200 per radio. At the outs would have to pay a total of $3,990 with Nelson Radio. We would still a savings of $4,010 over the budgeted amount. • I recommend that we purchase these radios immediately at the $2,640.00 Nelson Radio with a billing date of 1-1-83 or later. After much negot conversation with the three companies, I feel that this represents the responsible and efficient method of making this necessary change. DJD:cb NOTE TO COUNCIL: Please refer to the 1983 Budget Document, pages 10, 50 and 52a, background information on financing this expenditure. I have seen the demonstration unit in one of the squad cars and thoroughly impressed with the unit. I concur with Chief Delmont and recommend authorizing this Capital Expenditure. O.J.J. 12-23-82 we erience ice from ion and st for am CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS M E M O December 30, � To: Orvil Johnson, City Administrator From: Gene Lange, Fire Marshal .982 Subject: Outdated Scott Self-Contained Air Breathing Appara�tus The Capital Improvement request from the fire department f r the year 1983 includes the replacement of two Scott Air-Pacs t at we could not convert to positive pressure. In our 1982 reque t we had enough money to convert the other twelve units from ne ative to positive pressure to comply with the OSHA regulations w ich go into effect on July l, 1983. Our request for $2,500 was to purchase two new units with spare tank for each. Due to local competition between two deale s and the manufacture's trade-in promotion the purchase price of these units is less than we estimated last fall. I have receive bids from both dealers, the low bid from Mid Central Fire would allow us to purchase three complete units plus two extra air tan s for a total of $2,460. Their quote is good until mid January, at that time the list price (over $900.) will be increased 7�. Th trade- in allowance also expires with the present quotation-bid. Please submit this request at the next meeting on January �, 1983. � .. . � •. , . . . , _ , . _ ;s , . _�,-:;�l.�a�ue of minne�ota citie� , December �20,�� 1982 ' , `, , `� � ` � Dear �:City Official: , ; • '�::r�::,'�,:;, ��C � � (�f�%� � Y Tbis letter is being sent to you to clarify the current positi.on af th League af Minnesota Cities with regard to the farmula for the distribution�af Lo al'Government Aid. This is potentially an extremely divisive issue. Since disunity.could hurt all cities, the League is cammitted�to acting as a forum where cities can ontinue to resolve their differences among �hemselves. - ��=r - ' l . . �.. ' � l Thus, the League Board of Directors has taken cognisance of the urgenc af this matter and has scheduled meetings on January 14 and 15 for this purpose. On anuary 14, the ' Baard�will.conduct a�hearing on proposals ta alter �he Local Gavernmen Aid �distr3.bution�farmuia., The Baard invites a11 cities to submit comments or suggestions. � Those wishing �o_appear at the hearing shauld cantact Ann�Higgins at t e League Office ta reserve a place an the heazing agenda.• The LMC Board wi13. also�;req est � - presentations,from�a group of inetrapolitan cities, the City af Minneap lis, and the Local'�Governfuent Folicy Task Force -{aPPointed by Governor Quie} ;-�,: Each has. developed ' s: .- •different approaches,"•fo+making:changes-.in� the me'thod of �LGAlallocation � � - .; • . • ' . . ; ,� . �-� . - , . , � , . . . � . , . - 4 . ' '•. ThewLMC'jBoard.of Di�ectors has constituted.itself as a task force�to r view�these" �-��......,;a].ternatiyey�LGA.�forniula:, propasals from the; perspective,rof ' grincip].es�:�r commended..°by the �X� -:.;�: - -:..�;.:. , , ��.,,a:: �,,v- .. , .:... . , , .;�:.:,,. . . . . . _ '�eague;�Revenue�.S'aurces;.Cammittee and 'appraved-by+the'•Board`�'this,.past:•w ek.:. �;Those : ., pxinciples staCe , , '�. � " . `� . •' . : . � :-�y ; � . ., � .. "' • ' . s �'- . � . _ . . . ., , - - s � ° - � ,•� '��Any LGA�increase ar decrease to an�individual city resulting fr m the new formula shouZd be ghased in. • j ' The annual LGA appropriation shnuld increase in accordance with any increase in the State's Genera2 Fund revenues. Cities can then responsi ly plan an LGA as a revenue source with assurance af a specified 1eve1. of stat commitment ta the pragram. ' Any city which suffers a reductian in LGA payments as a result f a new formula must be a].lowed to offset that revenue loss by increasi g the local property tax levy. � �' LGA Fayments should be distributed to cities monthl.y, but not 1 ss than � quarterly. �/ �t} 'r" N '1 8� universi� avenue ea�t, s�. aui, minnesota �5'I O'I �C'I �l 2�-5C QCt � Y P �3 q . � . � . -2_ - , , . " ' ::a i , � ' ' � , • ' . . .; ,. . ,,.} -. :`;;^:;�LGA �paqments��should nat be reduced from budgeted amounts after September 1'oE�x''� • � y,. , _� � -the year.�,g'receding the cities' affected fiscal year. ° =. . . ' • . .. � ., •-�,, ;� �.' :. '.:: S.ince the primary purpase of LGA is property tax relief, funds should be ,- �� ,;'=, ;`- ;. �`;-�_...,_,: distributed on a basis that�recognizes"each�city's expenditure needs�and-local �- • , '_ revenue-raising abiliCy. � ' - ' � ,. ,- •-. ' No individual city"should be able to manipulate the formula by increasing , • . ; � - ' , spending. - � . - • ' - . . . , , .- . - „ , .��The LMC Board WiIZ en@eavar•ta make recommendatiat}s on the subject af aliocation af LGA �',�_ Ca•ciL'ies to Ctie League membership at the LMC-Legislative Action Conference on - . .�,Wednesday�� January 26. - � . ��._• IC�is'impartant�for all of•us to reaZize that it is critical for cities-to continue to. work together Co ratain any pragram of state aid to cities in rahich cities themselves �� (will),have a voice.. The State L�gisl.ature may�well perceive disunity as an .oppor�unity to further diminish that partian of state ravenues allacated to ci�ies. • . This is•especially true since State Budget�constraints make it more�difficult ta continue property tax relief and aid pragrams. ' . .Some cities appear'to be willing to risk serions disunity'within the League ra�ther �han to enter negot3.ations ta resolve poiicy di£ferences. It is possible we will all Iose ,in such a struggle. I believe that c3.ties have a greater need to cooperate than to � . risk such loss af strength and mutual suppart. -� • .�, Zn,the hope `that you share this canviction, I encourage you to taik with your • .-� ,., colleagues and urge.them to forego unnecessary disputes an-this matter and to press for �. �•<a process�of negotiatian to enable th.e League to exercis� appropri.ate•leadership.- - . , . . . � . , , : . � 5incexely, . . _, . . . .... , _ ' . � . � � � _ _ � . _ ;� .,.. , ' , � • . � , �. ... „ �.� - • _ , _ ; O ,-.. , � : , - . . .` . .. , ' , , -. ` ' ±y� `�.�IL�^��/�/}'(,/� ' � ' � � •. "i'.+:i,t.. „ "�.Y. A ^ ' J., - .1y� . , . ��, -Josephine.:.Nunna +r - . . � - .� . , � �. '. ';.. . w .;4 � ��ia• 's� w .'41 �.S b �� . . s''��t.�y��.�"i.��•, � • . , "�� '1e. •• t�' ,. �. . '>S'"!�S`<y,�' .."i' , �.� ' ' ' , y�` ` , , " ' .�, .�..Mayor;;:City, of��Ciiamp�;in;,:�"" ;i' `� •;';�� ._ . . . . . • . . . . - .,;.'�' . , :: ��PresidQnt, Zeague�' of Min.nesota , Cities, - ° ' � � }', ' . . JN : rmm� • ' , � . . . ` _�� DAKOTA C �n �� Y TRIBUNE I C TED MAIN OFFICE - FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55024 dRANCH OFFICES ROSEMOUNT LAKEVILLE BURNSVILLE APPLE VALLEY December 21, 1982 �City of Mendota Heights Dakota County State Ban� 75� Plaza Drive , Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 Dear Council Members: AREn 612•n63-7fJB4 l�, .:5 � �'"..rJ DEC� � � i�82 Within the next month you will be holding your reor�an meeting for 1983. We at the Dakota County Tribune sinc hope you will appoint the Tribune Your official newspa zatio nal rely er. We do our utmost to accommodate and cooperate with gov rning bodies, and feel our past record shows we offer accura e and efficient service. • If you have any questions, please feel free to phone u 463-7884. Sincerely, DAKO COUNTY RIBUNE INC. .� . G� aniel H. Clay Publisher � ' � � � D � � �/�3 P R 1 N T E R S A N D P U B L 1 S H E R S S I N C at , 1 8 8 4 b� De cembe r 8, 19 82 �SUN �� . EWSPAPERS .�` MINNESOTA SU6URBAN NEW PAPERS, INC. �� 401 Buah Leke Roed Edina. MN 55435 • $gi-/200 . City Council City of Mendo�a Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heigh�.s, MN 5512Q Gentlemen: .L' ` ,'' L. t�,r � I� _t. J ! V3�� Yaur desiqnation of the West St. Paul-Mendota Hea.ghts Sun o be your afficia2 newspaper for the year i983 will be mos� app eciatecl. The rate for leqal publications as set by Minnesota law is 22,6� per line for the first insertion, 15.1� per line for each ubsequent a.nsertion. Tabular rnatter, i.e., proper names, numbers, le al descript,ions, etc., is 7.5� per line additional for the or'ginal insertion with no additional charge for repeats of the ori inal insertion. We will provide, at na additional charge, �.wo notarized af idavits on each af your publications. Additional notarized affidav'ts on request, will be furnished at 25� each. All publications should reach this office by 2 p.m., Fridayj,preced- ing your Wednesday publication. � In order to expedite aur services to you, it is requested t a� you direct your publications �a the attention of Meri.del Hedblo , Legal Department, ?40i Bush Lake Raad, Edina, MN 55435. Thank yau for your consideration of this, our af£iciai appl for designation af the West St. PauZ-Mendota Heights Sun a� officia3 newspaper far the ensua.ng year. Very truly yaurs, �,�,...-.,'- � 1�4,INN -SOTA S BURB'AN NEWSPAPERS,' TNC. ff r� �� .� �� . Elmer L. Andersen Publisher Ccation your � a, ��m� � 300 Metro Square Building, 7th Street and Robert Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101. December 29, 1982 Mr. Orvil Johnson, Administrator City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive St. Paul, Minnesota 55120 � Dea r Orv i 1: ' �t�„ << - 612, 291-6359 I have enclosed five copies of t.he loan agreement. Please have the executed by the appropriate person and return them to me along with the city's resolution acting on the loan. I can't process the loan thr ugh our finance department until I receive the five executed copies fro the city. If you have any questions, call me at 291-6518. Sincerely, Gregg Jf1Ft�(s6�ii Grants Coordinator GJ:im Encs. e1n t��;itne:�� (;rt•.i6��t) �o Cuorciin,tte: f.he Yl:tnnin{; :ind I)�velu��ment. of the 'I'��•ui (:il.ies �'1t•trn��uli�, n��rc�;i (.;r,mpriyin�;. /lncikaCniu�t�' (;��rverCountY �I)o-ikut<tCc�unty��N��iinepinC��unLv �ft.unsey(_'nunL�� cc,it(:�iunty 1'1'<ishinRtun(:oun[,�� :�n F��u�il C)p�x�rtunit.>' l�:mpl�i��cr C . � _ �1'.w/ .• CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 82-89 RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PLANNING ASS WfiEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights is operating under an Comprehensive Plan; and .� - WHII2EAS, additional land use controls are being considered by Metropolitan Council due to aircraft noise adjacent to the Minneap Paul International Airport; and WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights has expended over $5,000 participate in the formulation of guidelines addressing land use c with aircraft noise; and � Q � /St. merely tability Wf�REAS, the land use planning and associated controls for near y one- half of the 6,262 acres in Mendota Heights will need to be reevaluat d and reestablished; and WI�REAS, such planning services are estimated to cost $ 20,000. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council this 4th day o November, 1982, that application be made to the Metropolitan Council for an in erest-free loan to assist in the planning services necessary in amending the Me dota Heights Comprehensive Plan to accommodate future airport planning requiremen s. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 4th November, 1982. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA By ��z/ Robert G. Mayor ATTEST: d�.C��J � � / - athleen M. Swanson C � City Clerk �� of � Contract No. 7810 LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 7n� day of �P�Pmhar 198 2, by and between the Metropolitan Council, hereinafter referr the "Council," and the��y of Mendota Heiqhts , hereinafter r as the "lendee." � �\ to as erred to WHEREAS, the Council is required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 73.851, et seq., to administer the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, hereinaft r referred to as the "Act," which requires local governmental units within the Metropolitan Area to prepare comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, the Council is required by Mi.nneosta Statutes, Section 73.867, to establish a planning assistance fund to assist local governments in` arrying out planning activities and to adopt uniform procedures for the awar , disbursement and repayment of grants and loans. WHEREAS, the Council desires to assist the lendee in carrying ou additional planning in response to unresolved planning issues betwee local plans and Council policy plans that were raised in the local comprehensive plan. I NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the Council's agreement to loan planning funds to the lendee and the lendee's agreement to repay said funds, he Council and lendee agree as follows: 1. A. The Council shall pay to the lendee, in accordance with the schedule set forth below, a total loan amount of $ Loan funds shall be made available to the lendee as follows: The period for release of the loan funds has been negotiat�ed between the Council and lendee and is stipulated as follows: $15,000 on or before January 10, 1983 6. The lendee agrees that no more than 75 percent of the tot 1 cost of carrying out the work program set forth in lendee's application for loan assistance, Appendix A, attached hereto and made a pa�rt hereof, �hall be financed by loan funds. � C. The lendee shall utilize the loan funds to carry out the ctivities specified in the funded portion of the work program set f rth in Appendix A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. D. The lendee agrees to comply with all provisions of the Mei Council Application, Award and Disbursement Guidelines for Administration of Planning Assistance Loans, hereinafter r as the "Loan Guidelines" dated September 12, 1982, which � incorporated by reference into this agreement and made a K opolitan the ferred to hereby rt �hereof . -2- f 2. Authorized use of Loan Proceeds It is understood and agreed that the following costs and expenses shall `be the only such costs and expenses paid for out of loan proceeds. Costs and expenses to be reimbursed shall additionally be _in substantial accord with specifications contained in the lendee's loan application and other provisions contained herein. The following costs specifically incurred in carrying out the planning activities specified in the funded portion of the work program shall be payable f�om loaned amounts. A. Compensation of existing staff. B. Compensation of newly hired staff. C. Employment of a qualified consultant(s). D. Payment of other costs such as overhead, re�tal of space and equipment, purchase of supplies, printing and publishing. 3. Accounting A. The lendee agrees to establish and maintain accurate and complete accounts and records relating to the receipt and expenditure of any and all loan funds including, but not limited to, documentation and information relating to the selection and payment of consultants. B. The above documents and records of the lendee shall be audited in the same manner as all other accounts and records of the lendee are audited, and may be audited and/or inspected on lendee's premises or otherwise by individuals or organizations designated and authorized by the Council at any time following reasonable notification during the loan period, and for a period of three years following final loan payment. 4. Reports A. Midpoint Report. Lendee shall prepare and deliver a midpoint report by letter notifying the Council that the activities undertaken in connection with loan assistance are half completed. The report shall contain a short description of the utilization of loan funds, projected future planning expenses, and any anticipated problems in meeting completion dates. . B. Final Progress Report. The lendee agrees that upon completion of the total work program, the lendee will submit to the Council a final progress report which shall be evaluated by the Council to determine that: 1) The planning costs funded by this loan did not exceed 75 percent of the total cost of the work program. 2) The scope of work was completed. 3) The terms of this agreement were met. -3- 5. General Conditions A. Duration. The period of loan award specified herein shall commence on the execution of this agreement and remain in force and effect until December 1, 1985 B. Repayment. The lendee agrees to repay the Council in the following schedule: 1. $7,500 on or before December 1, 1984. � , 2. Balance of $7,500 on or before December 1, 1985. C. Rights Reserved. In the event that the Council finds that been a failure to comply with the provisions of this agree Council reserves the right to take any and all such action deems necessary or appropriate to protect the Council's in ance with there has nent, the as it terest. D. Changes. The terms of this agreement may be changed or moidified by mutual agreement by the parties hereto. Such changes or difi- cations shall be effective only upon the execution of written amendments signed by authorized representatives of the Cou cil and lendee. E. The lendee agrees to•comply with all applicable laws relating to nondiscrimination, affirmative action, and public purchase, contracting and employment. In particular, lendee agrees not to discriminate against a y employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religi n, sex or national origin, and to take affirmative action that appli ants and employees are treated equally with�respect to the followin : employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, la off, termination, rates of pay and other forms of compensation, and selection for training. ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreemen executed on the day and year first above w�ritten by their authorized representatives. Approved as to legal form and adequacy: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL By Charles Weaver, Chairman LENDEE By Title to be Office of Staff Counsel I • CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO T0: City Council FROM: Orvil J. Johnson � City Administrator December 29, 1982 SUBJECT: Revised 1983 Non-union Salary Recommendations In accordance with your directions on December 21, I have revis recommended salary chart and the recommended insurance contributions directed that the entire compensation backage be limited to 6�. 'My proposal included salary increases of 6.19� and $20 per month insura which totaled 6.89�. the You iginal e increase, In order to comply with your directions I used the total 1982 c st (salaries and insurance) which resulted in an allowable increase of $1,992 per month for the 16 full time employees and three paxt-time employees. I took th liberty of arbitrarily assigning $10 per month insurance benefits, leaving the emainder of $1,832 ($1,992 -$160 =$1,832) to be distributed amongst the 19 pos tions. Since I had spent a considerable amount of time determining the rela ive increases on the original memo, I merely decreased each increase by 6.48� and hen rounded off to the nearest dollar. The accompanying chart represents an inc ease of $1,830 per month in salaries. I therefore recommend your favorable consideration of the chart and the following several special conditions. 1. Hospitalization Insurance - as amended As mentioned above, salary increases were based on insurance co tri.butions being increased by $10 per month, therefore I recommend that th insurance contribution for the full time non-union employees be set at a.m ximum of $120 per month. 2. Mileage - I am attaching a memo from Jim Danielson concerning mileage, es ecially as applies to engineering personnel. You will note his two propos ls. I believe that they are worthy of serious consideration because o the special nature of automobile use as applies to engineering field activi ies. I would recommend the following: a. Reimburseable mileage be set at 25� per mile. This was ecommende last year; you authorized 22� per mile. This is paid to Ed, Jim, Kathy and others who occasionally use their cars on City business. b. Jim's Alternate 2- pay Tom Knuth and Guy Kullander 29�•�er mile for their "hard miles", 25� per mile for "street miles" -2- c. Monthly rat�s as follows: 1. Police Chief -$90 per month (no change). 2. Recreation Director -$35 per month (no change). 3. Administrator - Include in salary (no change in amount, i.e. $175/mo.). � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEM4 T0: Orvi7 J. Johnsan City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielsan Public Works Directar SUBJECT: 1983 Mileage Adjustment December 9, 198 According to Uni.ted States Department of Transportation the �7982) costs of owning and operating a mid to large size car is 2 26.6 cents per mile {based on 10 year, 120,000 mile usage).. For driven less than the yearly average the cost per mile i►icreases b the "fixed costs" amaunt �toover 2/3 af the per mile cost with ga accounting for the remainder. An increase in the Gity"s current 22 cents per mile reimbu should therefore be considered. In addition, consideration shauld also be given to subsidizin Knuth and Guy Kul]ander of the engineering department for off road miles" they put on their vehicles.while performing survey and con tion inspection duties. Futhermore, Tom carries, year round, in h all the surveying paraphanalia and ather implements rteed ta comple duties. This an advantage to the City and an inconvenience to him have discussed several alternativeseach of which would be acceptab Tom and Guy. Aiternate 1. rrent 8 ta hicies ause line Tom "hard truc- s car e his We e to Pay Tom a monthly lump sum availabiiity payment af $2t�.00 and "hard mileage" of 25 cents per mi1e, leaving normal mileage at 22 cents p r miie. Guy would receiue lesser amount for auto availability only d ring cons�ruction periods when }ie performs inspectian duties independently fram Tom plus a"hard mileage" rate of 25 cents per mile. Alternate 2. Establish a separate off road "hard mileage" rate of 29 cents er mile.with no availability payments. Because of its nature this mile ge is much.3ess fuel efficient and causes extra ordinary maintenance. This miieage would be used 6y Tom and Guy when on project inspections, s rveys, etc. THESE MILES ARE ALL PROJECT REIMBURSABLE AT NO COST TO TNE ITY. Tom has done a study to support his "Sreak Even" rates that wo 1d result if either of the above mileage adjustment a3ternatives were ap- praved using actual costs incurred over the iast few years. FOSITION ?.W, Supervisor Dir. P.W. £:�gr. Aide IZZ JOB # 10 12 15 £ngr_ Aide IV �� City Engr. lg Code Enforce. Off, �� ?olice 5qt. Det. Fire riarsh. Lolice Chief Falice Clerk Engr. Searetary Acctg. Gierk 19$3 SALARY PROPL__.L (12EVISED 12-29-82) 1982 MEAN MENDOTA HTS. RATE 6$ GROiJP 5 RATE* 39$1 19$2 INCREASE $2109/mo. $1895 $2070 $124 3208/mo. 2355 2667 160 17951ma. 1400 2450 • 87 1983%mo. 2700 1850 111 2833/mo. 26dQ 26Q0 1S6 202Q/mo. 175Q 1915 115 28 2486/mo. 2185 2400 144 �A , 2315 2530 152 3Z 311?/mo. 2540 2740 1fi4; 42 1494/mo. 832 910 5a 42 1094/mo, 875 900 5,4 36 1300jmo. 1155 1270 76~ s . RECOMMENDED � It3C . I1VC . 1983 MO . R�TE 5.65 $117 $2,187 5.36 143 2,810 5.52 80 1,530 5.68 105 5.38 140 5.64 1.Q8 6.04 145 5.53 140 7.12 195 6.16 56 6.78 61 6.61 84 1,955 2,790 2,023 2,545 2,670 2,935 966 961 1,354 Rec,pt./Secy. 42 1094/mo. 82p 905 54 6.74 61 966 �dmin. S�cre�ary 48 1363/mo. 1040 1165 70 6•d0 70 1,235 City Clerk 60 NA "' 1635 1$OQ � 108 6•n0 �Q8 1,90$ �c3ministrator 63 3625/mo. 3Q35 3305 198 4.66 154 3,459 + 175 Fire Chief 34 Part-time 255 280 17 6.07 17 297 - - Asst. Chief _ ` NA -- - Part-time ` - - 140 -- - - 155 g 5.81 - 9 - '� 164 - �ec Director NA Part-time 58� ��p �g ��R �7 6'�'� * Although Mendata Heights has been categorized in Group 5, the above ciata is based on Graup S information, {Previous comparisons). 0 TO: EROM: RE�t'�' � • t ,. ._ ' G' � D , i a";�. u December 10, 1982 METROPOLITAN AREA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION MEMBERS Labor Relations Subscriber Service Members ! Jerry Dulgar, Chairman i MAMA Committee on Labor Relations Subscriber ! Service Contract �, SUBJECT: LABOR RELATIONS SUBSCRIBER SERVICE In November, 1982, I was appointed to chair a committee'to the Special Subscriber Services portion of the agreement b League of Minnesota Cities and Labor Relati.ons Associates, addition, Jack Irving and Bob Thistle were appointed to�th Committee. Also participating in the negotiating process Slater, Executive Director, League of Minnesota Cities and Peterson, Executive Director, Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. In view of the current State fiscal crisi pleased to report that there will onl_y be a 3 to 5� increa depending on the city's population. Since there was no in the 1982-83 fee the increase in fees over the two years is averaqed 1-1/2 to 2-1/2$ increase. � General Membership Services The current (1982-1983) agreement provides for two'ty relations services. The first is "General Membership for cities that are members of the LMC and AMM. Each organizations contribute an amount to the labor se�rvi behalf of their memberships. The "General Membership part of the agreement provides for: Articles in the magazine; general advice and assistance by telephone correspondence; one personal conference; advice on,ar selection; and advice and assistance to LMC staff �rel proposed or adopted state and federal legislation.� AMM Service negotiate tween the Inc. In ere Don Vern , I am e rease in onlv an es of labor Services" of these es fund on Services" MC Cities r itrator ting to The AMM services include meetings, telephone calls, r view of ' proposals and counter-proposals with regard to an AMM member's labor relations efforts, and general coordination of he metropolitan cities' labor relations goals. � Special Subscriber Services The second part of the agreement provides For Special�Subscriber Services. The contract language emphasizes joint �bar. aining. LABOR RELATIONS SUBSCRIBER -2- S�RVICE M�MBERS December �0, 1982 The agreement also provides that the consultan� {Lab�r Relations Associates, Tnc.) will advise subscribers in their individual nego�iations, mediatzon and/or arbitration effarts. However, if Labor Relations Assaciates, Inc. staff is. to be involved in the attendance or preparatian far attendance at such individual efforts, the individual subscriber will be bil2ed accordingly. The fee schedule �or the 1983-1984 Subscriber year is as fo2lowsz Papulation Cateqory Under 5,000 10,000 �s,oaa ao,oao Over 5,000 9,999 14,999 19,999 29,999 30,000 � 1982-1983 Fee $ 680 1,010 1,415 �,$�a 2,425 3,025 1983-1984 �ee $ 70Q 1,060 1,485 1,970 2,545 3,175 In�oices and copies a� the 1983-1984 agreement are being sent to all ci�ies curren�ly using the special subscriber services. This letter and capies af the 1983-1984 agreement are also being sent to all MAMA cities no� using the special subscriber services. If these cities {non-subscribing} wish �o use the special subscriber services, please remit the appropriate fee for yaur population group to the League of Minnesota Cities-Labor Rela�ians Subscriber Service. Your population category should be determined by using the mast rec�nt Metropolitan Council papulation estimates. Remittance of your special subscriber fee shauld be forwarded to the League af Minnesota Cities na later than March l, 19$3. The on-going administration o� the agreement will be the primary responsiility of the Executive Director oE the�League of Minnesota Cities. The LMC Labor Relations Subscriber Servzce Contract Commit�ee exerci�es general jurisdiction over the agreement. Both the LMC and AMM financially contribute to the cost o� providing �he services as enumerated under the agreement. If there are any questzons regardzng the 1983-1984 agreement please call mysel�, any members of the Cammittee, Don Slater or Vern Pe�ersan. At�achment ours truly ; � ' err, Du q C�.ty� Manage : City af �naka � r�afiE �o cacjrTc �� : This is submi�.ted for y'our info. � Our use cs� St. Pau]. EmpZayers Association has been satisfac , and has cost about $1,000 in s_�s ana $i,iaa �n 1982. a.J.,�. 12-30-82 CITY OF MENL}OTA HEIGHTS ��M �1� �"4 "'' � j�,� DAICQTA COUNTY, MINNES(7TA 'R� �-9 RESOLTJTIOI3 N0. $3- RESOLIITION ADOP'I'ING 19$ 3 BUDGET �{3CUMENT WHEREAS, Levy Resolu�ion #82-83, adopted October 5, 1982, es levy of $979,800 collectible in 1983; and WHEREAS, the 1983 budget proposal was discussed an several o formed the basis �or Resolution #82-83; and V;iHEREAS, the Utility E'und and associated maintenance aperat user charges; and WI�i2EAS, the Capital Impravements Program was discussed on J lished a sions and relies on ary 4, 1983. NOW THEREF012E BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council this 4th day f January,, 1983, that the documen� titled Mendota Heights 1983 Budget is hereby acknowledged, said document can�aining the General Fund Budget Proposal far 1983, he proposed engineering services, charges and 1983 Budget, the Utility budget, t e Capital Improvements Program and ather fund docnmenta�ion; and � ' BE IT FURTHER RESQLVED that said Mendota Heights I983 Budget d cument is hereby approved and shall be used as the 1983 financial plan until a ended by future City Council action. ' Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 4th ay af January, 1983. ' . ' i CSTY COUNCTL CITY OF MENi?OTA HEIG TS I gp � Robert G. Lockwood Mayor ; ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk � 0 ,�I � 1 � �i �/'. � �, �I �'.I 1�r �/� ): . DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER ; 1860 HWY 55 • HASTINGS, MINNESOTA 55033 fT. �AUL MPLS. • * HAfTINO OAKOf� CWNTT Orvil J. Johnson, Administrator City of Mendota Hts.. � 750 Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mr. Johnson: �.. • J �Fr�E��i�c� w. ��v. .�I COUNTY AUh11fJISTRA'IJi� TELEPHONC• <et2�n3�-onte December 29, 1982 On December 21, 1982, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners adopt d the attached resolution regarding the potential of locating a horse raci g � facility in Dakota County. As directed by the resolution,•I wish to notify you of the action taken by the County Board. As a first step in a coordination effort with cities, chambers of co erce, and any other interested groups, we are suggesting that each party e pressing an interest in pursuing this issue select a representative to serve n an ad hoc group that would explore this matter further, with the following objec- tives in mind: ' • Serve as a coordinating body to insure communication and liaison among various bodies (government and private). ' • Develop cohesive positions on proposed legislative matters that ave an impact upon the racing facility and pari-mutuel betting issue • Provide input toward developing a strategy that would insure tha Dakota County will be viewed favorably for consideration as a si e for a future racing facility. At this point in time, we view the County as a facilitator in this p bringing a number of parties together that are,interested in a commo to investigate the possibility of locating a future racing facility County. Consistent with this role, an introductory/information meet held on Thursday, January 20, 1983 at 3:00 P.M. at the Apple Valley in the Conference Room (14200 Cedar Avenue South). We would expect this initial meeting to accomplish the following obj 1) County staff will provide an update of activities, and explain h got to where we are. � 2) In the event any pertinent legislation has been introduced in th lature, an explanation of that legislation will be given by Coun ,—.,�n+L115510flGRS -' !•,r ^IS7RICT^ IObF:f%H A FIl.RHIS H! STIPlv5 2ND DISTRIC7 GCRALt) E. HOLLENICA�-0f' SOUI'M ST PAUL 3itU UISl171CT JOHtJ S VOSS fJURWSVILLC _�"-'?_ �7 ; cess, by objective - Dakota g will be tv Hall, tives: we Legis- staff. /�N ECJUAL OWPC�f�'f'UPJI"f'Y [.Mf'LOYE.f+ 471+ DISTRICT , Sn� DISTF7ICT GENE ATKINS IiUSStl.l_ S'I'RLF.F'LAP7Ci IfJVCF2 GROVF. MEIGHT5 BUf2N5'JII.LL -2- 3} ppen discussion regarda.ng �he rale and expectations of the group (e.g., active rale, passive role, coordinative function). 4) The next step: • Raport to res�ective Cauncils/Baards, and receive further directian. • Devel.ap a strategy/approach to mast effectively address tha.s matter. • Future Meetings - representation, frequency, and lacation. I hape you or another representative will be able to attend this initial meeting, to express yaur views and provide your thoughts regarding any future activities related Co this i.ssue. If yau have any questians in reg�rd ta the matter, please feel free to call either myself (437-041.8) or Jeff Can.nell (437-0225). Sincerely, �� `.!� � , �`redersck W. 3oy Jr. County' Admina.str tor FWJ/JJC/vk cc: County Baard of Commissioners � Dakota County Legisla�ive Delegation , t � � � a ��r�nL vr �:vutv"l� x �..;Vl�T1�'11�51(..)lV�1�;.5 � DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA � Date ..Dec......2.1.�....1982 Reaolution No.........$?.._652.�.......... Motion by Commissioner... ........Hollenkamg_ Seconded by'Commissioner.......V,_ ss____,___� WHEREAS, The State Legislature will be considering the legali ation of pari- mutuel betting and the creation of a Ca�nission to govern par'-mutuel racing in the State of Minnesota this upcoming legislative session; d WHEREAS, There appears to be a preliminary interest among cit'es and other organizations in Dakota County regarding the potential of loc ting a racing facility in Dakota County; and � ��, Dakota County feels that a proactive coordinated app ach is required, in order to increase the opportunities for potentially locatin a racing facility in Dakota County. � NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, TYiat Administrative Services s�taff be directed to follow any proposed legislation regarding-pari-mutuel betti g and racing, and report to the County Board regularly as part of the legisl tive matters; and . BE IT FURTiiER RESOLVED, That County Administ�ative�SQrvices st f are directed to work with and coordinate any efforts�wi-th�-local jurisdictio s and other interested groups toward obtaining or providing information on this matter that may be of mutual benefit to Dakota County, with reports t be made to the County Board on a_r.egular basis; and , BE IT F[JRTHER RESOLVED, That_ the Co�ty Administrator is direc all local jurisdictions, cha�nbers of commerce, and other inter trf �Iiis a�-tivn. - � - YES Harris Hollenkamp, X Voss ' X Atkins X — Harris Hollenkamp Voss Atkins NO :ed to infoxm �sted groups Streefland X Streefland State of Minnesota � 88 i Coanty of Dakofa I, C. D. Oniachuk, duly elected, qualified and acting County Auditor of the County of akota, State of Minnesota. do hereby c�rtify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a resolution with the original minutes of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners, Dakota County, Minne ta, at their session held on the.......21st...... day of......December .............19.:$2., now on file in my office, and have found the same to be a true and correct copy thereof. , �Vitnes� my hand and official seal at Hastings, Minnesota, this.. 3Y':dday f..Ilec bt • �� __.._.... ...P..�t.�,r... _.,..__.—_._._ Covrly Auditor � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO December 29, 1982 T0: City Council FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Municipal State Aid Street System Mendota Heights is presently under its maximum allowed Munic pal State Aid Street mileage by 1.12 miles. Staff has studied th'e st eet � system and fins that Victoria Road (CR45) between Trunk Highway 1 and P4arie Avenue is on the County's list as a road projected for urn- back to the City. We feel this 0.66 mile section would be an exc llent segment to have on the City's Municipal State Aid Street System. , Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution that wi 1 provide for that to happen. � �� . ; CI.TY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A MUNICIPAL STATE AID HI�HWAY WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of Mendota . Heights that the street hereinafter described should be designated a ��unicipal State Aid Street under the provisions of P�innesota Law of 1967 Chapter 162: NOW THEREFOR, BE IT RESOLUED, by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the road described as follows,� to-wit: Victoria Road (CR45) from Marie Avenue to Sibley Memorial Highway (Trunk Highway 13) be, and hereby is established, located, and designated a P1unicipal State Aid Street of said City, subject to the approval of the Commis- sioner of Highways of the State of P�innesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City i.s hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissio,ner of Highways for his consideration, and that upon his ap- proval of the designation of said road or portion thereof, that same be constructed, improved and maintained as a Municipal State Aid Street of ~�� - the City of Mendota Heights, to be numbered and known as Municipal State Aid Street 107. ADOPTED , 19 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Robert G. Lockwood, P�ayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk 1 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � � T0: City Council FROM: James E. Danielsan Public Worlts Director December 30, 1� SUBJECI': Utility Services t�.A.C. Praperty Job Na. 8202 Improvement 82 Projeci 2 I reported to the Cauncil iast meeting when the feasibility hearing was set for this project that there are some uniQue aspects to this project. These unique aspects re.late more ta assessment of the casts than he feasi- bility of the project and the assessment fiearing will nat be held until next fa11. Staff and Council shouid be an ihe same wavelength in th beginning as to how these costs will be assessed. I have attached a drawin that has the "possible" assessable footage shown on it. A rational for th assessment of each are as faiiaws: ASSESSABLE RATES Sanitary Sewer Water Street Storm Sewer $3Q.00 per faot 18.00 per foot 34.OQ per foot .12 per sq. foot APPROXIMATE ASSESSMENT COSTS Name . Sani tary Sewer ��' lJater Perron $ 9,6Q0 $ 4,500 L.C.S. 16,Q50 g,090 Cauntry Club 19,800 li,$80 McNeill 3,OQ0 1,800 MnjDOT {A} 34,500 20,700 Mn/DOT (B) 3,000 1,800 MAC(Assessable} 2�,90Q 14,940 Sub-Total $110,85Q $ 64,71Q MAC (Trunk costs) � �2,oa� ��as,$ga JTAL �162,854 $171,600 Street ��,�oa 6,800 28,220 $74,124 �7�,i20 (Average of p (Average of p Actual Costs Actual Costs S ta rm $26,500 1,370 �,�ao �31,770 $31,770 st projects� st projects) 1`o ta 1 $ 14,1Q0 25,1�Q 31,680 4 ,800 120,800 12,970 �� ,sso $2$1 ,45U �� s,$�a $A�40 , 344 Staff recommends deferring all MAC costs until such time as a development scheme can be worked out. Tax Increment Financing would pay for all costs in interim. Staff also recommends the Mn/DOT land which was residential at time of Water Tower assessment and was not assessed should now pay its share of the assessment. 13 acres X $1,250 = $16,250. � ASSESSME�v�'ERIOD Watermain - 19 years PARCEL N0. 16400- 111-00 1640Q- 1i2-00 16400- 120-00 1b�00- 131-00 16400- 200-00 ,; �.- CITY OF ME�'�'�TA NEIGHTS '. �� PROPOSED AS�-�,Sh1ENT ROLL ASSES5P�ENT ` RATE �� WATERMAIN CROSSING AT WAGON WFiEEL TRAIL� WATERMAIN �18.00Ift. ACROSS I-35E �__ WATER SERVICE'- AS REQUESTED ..�____.____ ___.__. ____--._.__----.._._---- , (;$2,OOQ} REPUTED QWNER AND DESCRIPTIQN Richard W. & Mary Bebel i011 Wagan Wheei�Trail Mendota Heights, MN 55120 James & Audrey LePore 2021 Wagon Wheel Trail Mendota Heights, �qN 55120 Marian H. Pace 991 4Jagon Whee1 Trail Saint Paul, MN 55120 Alois T. & Adeline E. Wagner James & Judith Widmyer 9HJ Wd�4J1 Wheel Trai1 P�endota Heights, MN 55120 �lilton N. & Danna Anderson 994 Wagon Wheel Trail Mendota F{eights, P�1N 55120 SUBDIVISIpN Caroline's L.akeview Addition Caroline's Lakeview Addition . Caroline's Lakeview Addition Caroline's LakevSew Addition Caroline"s Lakeview , Additian FRONT FOOTAGE WATERMAIN WATER SERVICES 232 303 219 225 .r $4,176.QQ $5,454.00 $3,942.00 $�,Q50.00 $2,$80.00 �: _ �� PLEDGED SECURITIES December 31, 1982 DAKO�A COUNTY STATE BANK $100,000 Farm Credit Bank CHEROKEE STATE BANK 200 , 000 U. S. Treasur.y.�Note 400,000 Farm Cr�dit Bank 200,000 U.S. Treasury Notes 300,000 U.S. Treasury Notes 200,000 U.S. Treasury Notes $1,300,000 FIRST NATIONAL BANK - ST. PAUL �� 13 1/8� 15.25� 13 1/8� 15� 14.375� 660,000 Huntington Park Redev. Agcy. Calif. 11� 330,000 Ontario Calif. SF Mtg. 11% 130,000 Tulsa Co. Okla, Equip Lease Agmt. 6.5� $1,1�0,000 SIGNAL HILLS STATE BANK 50,000 Edina Mn G.O. 50,000 Dakota County VoTec 25,000 Beltrami Co. G.O. 50,000 Madison Mn. G.O. 50,000 ISD #271 G.O. 25,000 Beltrami Co. G.O. 25,000 Arlington, MN. ISD #731 50,000 Plymouth, MN.GO.O 20,000 Ramsey Co. ISD #625 25,000 New Hope, NIN G.O. 25,000 New Hope, MN G.O. 45,000 St. Paul, I� 35,000 Prescott, WI School G.O. 35,000 St. Paul Port Authority G.O. 25,000 Fargo, N.D. G.O. $535,000 6.2g 5.75� 4.6� 5.9� 6.1� 4.5� 4:5� 5.4� 3.75� 4.85� 4.85� 5� 4.6� 3.5� 5.5$ Additional collateral each bank $100,000 FDIC Insurance. 5-2-83 8-15-85 7-23-84 7-31-84 1-31-84 11-15-84 6-1-2006 1-1-2009 12-10-86 12-1-89 4-1-88 2-1-87 2-1-90 2-1-87 2-1-86 1-1-86 2-1-85 11-1-87 2-1-87 2-1-87 5-1-88 3-15-85 3-1-85 7-1-85 r CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 83- RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 1983 CITY DEPOSITORIES OF FUNDS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heigh that the following institutions be designated as depositories for Cit funds for 1983: Dakota County State Bank Signal Hills State Bank Minnesota Federal Savings & Loan Northwestern National Bank of St. Paul Cherokee State Bank Minnesota State Bank First National Bank of St. Paul American National Bank of St. Paul Adopted by the City Council of the Ci-ty of Mendota Heights this 4th January, 1983. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA By ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk Robert G. Lockwood Mayor =s, y of %y SErfion� (aNE __ ____ _....—�---...-- - - - - � -- �I Uy I � � Ud � � r � � C .�1�• �� o '-. 1 �_� /_._. .... .. .. � � 50 -- � � �� P��, � � y /�-- �� ' �P , c�rnou cr�uco— �� _�� /� 5" . � O Q N U u sn � _ n. _ � ,_ � 0 z _ _.