The URL can be used to link to this page

1982-08-03� 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY AGENDA AUGUST 3, 1982 7:30 P.M. 3. Approval of Minutes, July 6, 1982 and July 20, 1982. 4. Consent Calendar: a. List of Claims. b. List of Licenses. c. Code Enforcement Officer Monthly Report for July. d. Resolution Establishing Proposed Use Hearing. e. Planning Commission Minutes, July 27th. f. NDC4 Minutes, July 21st. End of Consent Calendar. 5. Bifl Award on 1982 Seal Coat Project. (Tabulation of bids and reco� able Tuesday evening). I 1 ' 6. HEARING: Case 82-10, Baskf ield, Application for Minor Condit and Variance.� (Reconnnend approval), ✓ � 7. Old Business: tion avail- Use Permit a. Letter from W. Murphy, Mn/DOT, requesting approval of Mainten nce Facility building permit. (Representatives will be present. See,attacied memo from Code Enforcement Off icer). b. Case 82-07, Ballard, Application for sign variance. (Recomme�d approval). c. Letter from Bream Homes requesting extension of temporasy sal�s trailer for Eagle Ridge property. 8. Commission Reports a. CAO 82-01, Nonnemacher, Application for Critical Area Site P1 n Review. (Recommend approval). b. Case 82-13, Colon, Application fo Variance. (Recommend appr val). . a l5'c; %�f�/l�'I7A U J� c. Case 82-15, Suburban Lighting, Application for variance for S rfco Gas. (Recommend approval). d. Case 82-17, Balyk and Associates, Application for Replatting f a portion of Delaware Crossing. (Recommend approval). e. Case 82-19, Gehrz, Application for Variance. (Recommend appr val. See attached memo from Code Enforcement Off icer and Planning Comm ssion minutes). n August 3, 1982 Agenda 9. New Business �._ Page �ao a. Letter from Crawford and Anderson regarding sanitary sewer , Public (�c �i' j � � � /'rr✓a /�i`r�f✓!� e f^ May o r�- �� ef. /�� i1 ��i �/ —�o l�'� � f h G�A7`i O h / City Administrator o / �� Gt. �7�"� vs o� YVi`/v�` �' s PA rL/' f�`7"� �:'r��`i �cF d7� Council Members ,b� 57�� ve ,�, e f" ��/Y% h r'r N vy. �uJ L;�5'7�r e z f / f,�s's�� i c)/ j��4�/,�'JD City Attorney City Engineer a. Memo on Burow Pond - Rolling Green. b, Ei� qr �� i`h/y �Pe,� a� f- i�%�.�L'�Jo /�T Public Works Director � City Clerk a. Correction to Page 1671 of the June 15th Council minutes. 10. Adjo�'nd��P ��/�,P af �i-*,9'� �� s�p ec �i/fr'r'/i �?� Clab il ity . C'� -r 7� 7, q, 44 �,' �l,�.�D % e � � i �, Page No. 1667 July 6, 1982 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, July 6, 1982 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City of Mendota I-Ieights was held at 7:3Q o'clock P.M. at the City H� Plaza Drive, I�ndota Heights, Minnesota. ty Council, , 750 South Acting Mayor N�rtensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'cloc P.M. The follo� members were present: Acting Mayor N�rtensotto, Counci]man Losleben and Councilwoman Witt. Mayor Lockwood and Counci]man Hartmann had notified the Coun il that they would be out of town. APPROVAL OF MLNiJTF.S Ayes: 2 Nays: 0 Abstain: 1 Witt Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 Councilman Losleben moved approval of Board of Review meeting held on June Acting Mayor Mertensotto seconded the Counci]man Losleben moved approval of the June 15th meeting. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Counci]man Losleben moved approval of June 21st meeting Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. : minutes of the with correction. .ion . minutes of minutes of CONSIIV'P Counci].man Losleben moved approval of t e consent calendar CALENI�R as submitted and recorrrr�ended for approv 1 as part of the regular agenda, with the exception of i ems 4c., memo on Pabst Meat Corr�any's application for building pezmit, and 4i., letter and proposed resolution from Mn/DOT requesting approval of bridge construct on plans and special provisions, as otherwise submit ed and reconmended for approval as part of the regular age da, along with authorization for execution of all nece sary doctar�nts contained therein. l. Acknowledgement of the Association f N1�tropolitan Municipalities Newsletter for June d a memo on Minnesota Constitutional amendments 2. Acknowledgement of a memo from the blic Works on 1983 Lawcon/LCN�2 Grant rankings. 3. Acknowledgement of the minutes of t e June 2nd Cable Commission meeting, minutes of the une 22nd Planning Conmission meeting and minutes of t e June 29th special Planning Commission meeting 3. Acknowledgement of a notice of rate increase from the Public Utility Commission relat've to Northwe Bell telephone rate increases. �1 .. 1 Page No. 1668 July 6, 1982 :, a 5. Adoption of Resolution No. 82-53, "Resolution Acceptir. Work and Approving Final Payment (Improvement No. 82, Project Nq. 5)," awarding final payment to F.F. Jedlicki, Inc., for work completed on the N.S.P. storm sewer extension project. -r „_ ��, . , _ . _ , � -, _ ., � Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 -"; .:r , � , �. - �� 6. Approval of the List of Claims dated July 6, 1982 and totalling $240,262.56. 7. Approval of the list of licenses, granting licenses to: Arrow Fence Fence Contractor License Abel Construction General Contractor License Biskupslci Fire L1�mage Repair C�neral Contractor License Midwest l�ofing Company General Contractor License Richgels Brothers Construction� General Contractor License _ Tollefson Builde'rs, Inc. General Contractor License T.J. Heating & Heating and Air '"` Air Conditioning Conditioning License .;., . - . , 8. Approval of the issuance of a cigarette license to Economics. Laboratory, Inc. 9. Acknowledgement of the Code Enforcerr�nt monthly report . for June. . . . . . , „ � ,r,. �r. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Case No. 82-11, NORTHLAND COMPANY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/WETLANAS PERMIT , _ _ __...•�_,� ., , ;.�� .., , ' � _' a � Acting Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the purpos� of a public hearing on an application frorr the Northland Land Corrq�any for a conditional use permit for the filling of Block 3, Mendota Heights Industrial Park. � � I�. George Burkhards, a representative of Northland presen �� t.,, _ for, the, meeting,.-reviewed topographic inforn�ation and graphics. He explained that the request is for a conditio� al use permit and wetlands permit for an area bounded by Mendota Heights Road, Northland Drie, Pilot,Knob Road and Transport Drive. N�. Burkhards advised that Northland �is,contemplating developing the property into an office/ . �office-warehouse parlc with a mix of one story structures along Mendota Heights Road and one to three story structurt in the balance of the block. He advised that Block 3 does not lend itself to single story structures because , ..of ,:a � 40y foot , drop -in- grade from the southeas t to the ,, � northwest corner of_the property. He stated that the , .soil is basically.sugar sand and very erodible and advised •, that the wetlands �area � actually created by Northland at the t une the original grading of the park took place. Nh-. Bur}chards stated that considerable fill material .is�,avail'able because of the construction of I-494 and it is proposed to utilize this material for the filling project.- He proposed that the area to be filled be � " � , ` . !' _, Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 �. _ � .�� _ y �r � Ayes: 3 Nays�: 0 ' SURFCO BUILDING PERMCT .." • . .. •�� .. • � , - . , , ., F ti Pag� No. 1669 July 6, 1982 surcharged and that the unstable materia be removed. He anticipated tk�at the filling would t e approx�mately one week and advised that haybales will used to control erosion at all the storm sewer catch bas'ns and that rye grass will be planted to control ero ion later if development doesn't occur soon. In resp nse to a question from the Council, he advised that Block consists of 17 acres and that approximately 40,000 c bic yards of fill'will be added to the site. . r . • . Counci]man Losleben expressed concern ov r future drainage particularly in view of the request to f'll the wetlands area. He asked whether the developers uld reserve to`the,City the right of final design of a storm drainage system within�the area and pointed out i.s concerns over a lack'of on-site ponding. Acting Mayor Mertensotto pointed out tha the City installe a storm,sewer`system in the park and did not incorporate a holding pond�at that time. Public Wor Director '' Danielson advised the Council that Mn/DO intends to provide ponding on the other side of T.H. 13 and meter 'out storm water from this area into the iver. - ,,,Acting�Mayor Mertensotto asked for quest from the audience. There being no questions or comnents fro Councilwoman Witt moved that the hearing 8:00 P.M. Counci]man Losleben seconded the motion. Acknowledging Counci]man Losleben's conc Councilwoman Witt moved the adoption of 82-54, "Resolution Approving Northland I Conditional Use Pennit," subject to conc to erosion control, street restoration � ,` with`�pproval of the requested wetlands '""' �accordance with plans • submitted with the Counci]man Losleben seconded the motion. _ - .. _ . _ - ,,,, • �„ : Acting Mayor Mertensotto noted that dis� � Surfco Co�any application for building cation of the former Skelly Oil station 110 had been continued from the June 15- He confirmed from the Surfco representa� � •' ��'.tYiat co"rporate "ownership of the facilit� • from the time that the conditional use � •� "� and tha`t the•rmodifications proposed do � terms of the original conditional use pE ' � Representatives of Surfco advised that - ' proposed will charige the facility from < to a gas station.- They also requested � of the installation of improved lightin� replace those existing. They stated th would be 14' in height to replace the e; and comments i the audience, be closed at rns over drainage esolution No. nd Company tions relating d seeding, along ennit, all in applications. ssion on the �ennit for modifi- n Lbdd and T. H. . meeting. Ves present has not changed rmit was issued t affect the mit . e modif icat ions service station uncil approval fixtures to the light poles sting 16' poles, ' '� � Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 TA[�1KER TRUCK � •ti �.._ , _�. .. Ayes : 3 = � • Nays: 0 Page No. 1670 � JL•ly 6, 1982 � and that the proposed new fixtures will throw the light down, not broadcast it as is the current situation. It was the concensus of the Council that the remodeling as shown in the drawings submitted with the permit request would not affect the original conditional use pennit as long as it is not the intent of the owners to provide for a future convenience store, which would be a violation of the conditional use, and which would not be allowed by the Council. After discussion, Counci]man Losleben moved approval of the issuance of �a building permit for the Surfco station�with the understanding that the conditional use permit is not affected since the structure is still retained in its origi.nal ownership and since there is no change in the conditions of that permit, and also approval of tlie lighting as presented in graphics and photographs presented to the Council, all based on the understanding that the owners' only intent in requesting the permit is to change from a full-service to a self- service operation. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Administrator Johnson advised the Council that bids were received at 10:00 A.M. this morning for the acquisition of a truck cab and chassis to be modified into a tanker truck for the Fire Department. He advised that only one bid, that of'Boyer Ford for a 1977 LN800 was received in response to the advertisement for bids. Me�ers of the Fire Department truck committee were present and recomr�nded awarding the bid to Boyer. , After a brief discussion, Counci]man Losleben moved to award to the bid for a truck cab and chassis to Boyer -�� '-, Ford for their bid of $12,900 for a 1977 LN800 cab and chassis iri as-is'condition, the acquisition to be funded by equipment certificate revenues. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. . y 1.� i• CASE NO. 82-06, Mr. Terrence Dobie was present to request approval of a DOBIE 43'8" variance from the wetlands ordinance to allow con- • struction of a new home on Lot 10, Block 3, Rolling � ' Green P;ddition . Nfr . Lbbie explained that his lot is ' �� '• 150 feet deep and approximately 20 feet of the depth ' ` is within the designated wetlands area. He stated that ""'~� � � in order to build his hame within 100 feet of the designat�. area, a variance is required. After discussion, Counci]man Losleben moved to approve a 43'8" variance from the 100' wetlands ordinance setback requirement, conditioned upon proper erosion controls as stated in the Planning Conmission and staff recorrrnen- dations, and subject to the Planning Conmission recorrrnen- _� Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 ,z CASE NO. 82-63, IX�'TH � � � i � Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 MISCII,LANEOUS � MISCELLAIVEOUS Page No. 1671 July 6, 1982 dation that the owner be responsible for stabilizing the fill area so that it does not erode nto the ponding area. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Mr. Nornian Roth was present to request a proval of the co�ination and replatting of Lots 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 10, T.T. Smith Subdivision No. 3. Nh�. Roth �lained that he proposes to combine the four sixty fo t lots and then divide them into three 80 foot lots Acting Mayor Mertensotto noted that if ��J is approved, the new lots would still 15,000 lot.�size requirement, but ackno proposal is better than the current pl e replatting be 70 0 of the dged that the �9- Counci]man Losleben moved that the heari g requirement ��. ,, . be waived and that the lot configuration as proposed be approved, along with approval of 20.0 foot frontage variances for each of the new lots, vari ces of 4205 square feet from the lot size requiremen s, and a 4'7" variance from the sideyard setback requ' ement for the easterly lot line of the new Parcel A. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Dr. Ik�rrell Westover was present relati� from the Mendakota Country C]_ub to inst� , around the new practice tee and faizway. showed the Council a sketch of the newl� tee and stated that the Club is really � to build a permanent 18 foot tall fence and north sides of the practice range. t . Acting Mayor N�rtensotto advised Dr. We� , Zoning Ordinance requires a conditional • a fence in excess of 6 feet. i-�e advise� of adjoining property, the Perkegwyn Irr have e�ressed their opposition to the : recommended that the Country Club both � ditional use permit and contact the adj� owners. The Council acknowledged receipt of a lE Burow relative to the condition of the P Shopping Center.. The Council directed t the letter be submitted to William Sh2eY that he should,consider the recoimiendat= N�:+Burow, as they were looked on very i Q : to a request .l a "test fence" Dr. Westover completed practi king permission .lona the south over that the se permit for that the owners stment Company, quest, and ply.for a con- ent property er from Robert dota Plaza t a copy of advising him s made by orably by the Page No. 1672 July 6, 1982 Council. FIRE STATION The Council acknowledged receipt of preli minary pro- posals from several architects relative to construction of a new fire station, along with rating sheets preparec by the City Administrator. It was the concensus of the Council that after each Council m�mber corr�letes and submits a rating sheet the three firnis receiving the best ratings should be invited to submit more specific proposals and be interviewed by the Council. � � RESIDENTIAL The Council acknowledged receipt of a memo from the ACTIVITY INVENTORY City Administrator lis.ting an inventory of activities inappropriately being conducted in residential districts. , It was the concensus of the Council that a letter should be sent to all property owners on the inventory, pointing out the activity which has been observed and giving them the opportunity to correct the situation before any furthe� investigation is necessary. MISCELLANEOUS The Council acknowledged receipt of a letter from the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities acknowledging receipt of the City's annual dues. MARIE AVENUE BIKEWAY The Council acknowledged receipt of a letter and resolutioi adopted by the County Board approving funding for'the bike path along Marie Avenue from Lexington to Victoria. It was acknowledged that the maximun $14,000 in funding will be based on City participation in a joint maintenance agreement. Staff was directed to pursue such agreement. 911 Administrator Johnson advised the Council that a presen- � tation on the "911" system is available to the City. The Council asked that the slide presentation be made at the July 20th Council meeting. CABLE COMMISSION The Council acknowledged receipt of the minutes of the June NDC4 meetings and the agenda for July 7th. Counci]man Losleben advised that he has submitted a positic , , A_ , paper to the Commission on behalf of the City. PABST MEATS The Council acknowledged receipt of a letter from Pabst Meats requesting approval of a building permit for minor , remodeling�in the interior of the facility. The Council also acknowledged a memo from the Code Enforcement Officer recorrrr�nding approval of the pezmit . Public Works Director Danielson e�lained the request, advising that the finn's main operation has been moved and that the proposed remodeling will acconmodate the Cotr�any's meat boning operation. Counci]man Losleben moved approval of the building permit as requested and in accordance with the plans submitted along with the pennit application. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays : 0 n . Page No. 1673 July 6, 1982 BRII)GE Public Works Director Danielson e�laine a reque�t CONSTRUCTION from Mn/DOT far Ca.ty approval a� plans d special pravi for construc�iar� of four bridges at tl� J35E-494 inter- seci�ion . Ayes: 3 � Nays: 0 I/I STUDY •t. 0 9 Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 MISCET,LAN'F'�OUS s •• •-�r j .� � • Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Acting Mayor After�a brie� discussion, Councilwoman W'tt moved the adoption of Resolution No, 82-55, "Resol tion Approving MnJDUT Plans and Special Provisions." Counci]man Lasleben seconded the mo�ion. Pub].ic Works Director Danielson revi.ewed propased resalution approving th� recent Infiltrationjlnflaw study. I�. Danielso that the Council autharized staff ta pro next step in �he I/I process, that being of a sewer system evaluation study for D recorrmended i.n the IJI study. After discussion, Council��an Losleben of l�solution No. $2-56, "Resolution F Inflow Analysis Report." Councilwaman Witt seconded the motian. is memo and completed recommended ed with the reparatian trict 3 as the adoption ng Infiltration/ The Council gave canceptual appraval. to t proposed SSES program ior District 3 at an estamat d cost of $27,775, subject to receipt of a financin report �rom the City Treasurer. The Council acknowledged receipt of the Status R�port for June. The City Clerk distributed copies of a d liquor ordinance for future Council cons There being na further busines to come Councilman Loslel�en moved that the mee Councilwaman Witt secanded the mcatian. TINIE OF AA70URNME'.NT: 10:14 o'clock P.M. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk ing on Joff sa1.e tion. Eore the Council, � be adjourned. Page No. 1674 July 20, 1982 CITY OF I�NDOTA IiEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, July 20, 1982 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the Cit of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M, at the City Hall, 750 Drive, Mendota Heights, Mi.nnesota. T Council, City South Plaza � Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The fo lowing me�ers were present: Mayor Lockwood, Counci]man Hartmann, Counci]man Losleben, Councilwoman Witt. Counci]man Mertensotto had notified the Council that he would be out of town. 0 CONSENT Counci]man Hartmann moved approval of the consen calendar as CALENDAR submitted and reco�r�nded for approval as part o the regular agenda, along with authorization for execution o all necessary docLunents contained therein. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 l. Approval of the List of Claims dated July 204 1982 and totalling $1,179,857.30. � 2. Approval of the list of licenses, granting l�.censes to: C & C . I�velopment Corrpany Donald E. Wilbur Gold Key Realty Harrison Development, Inc. Mrozik Construction, Inc. Patio Village Ra-Den Energy Saver Rayco Construction Corr�any, Inc. Sussman Construction Co. Ostlund Plastering, Inc. N1cPhillips Bros., Inc. Concrete Fence Contrac General Contr General Contr General Contr General Contr General Contr General General Plaster Roof ing License r License r License r License r License r License License License License 3. Approval of the isuance of a one-day 3.2 on- ale beer license to the Mendota Heights Lions Club, along wit waiver of the license fee. 4. Acknowledgement of the Fire Department and 'I'�easurer's monthly reports for June. � 5. Acknowledgement of a memo from the League oflMinnesota Cities regarding regional meetings. 6. Adoption of Resolution No. 82-57, "RESOLUTIO ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT (IMPROVII�lENT NO. 81, PROJECT N0. 6)," awarding final payment of $84,210.8 to Richard Knutson, Inc. for work co�leted on the Nort and Drive/'I`rans- port Drive improvement project. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. � �� Page 1675 � July 20, 1982 " IVY FALLS FIRST The Council acknowledged receipt of a letter from Sanders and ADDITION Associutes on behalf of Mr. Ellis Abrahamson, 714 Maple Park Court relative to drainage problems affecti.ng his property. Mr. Larry Wacker, from Sanders and Associates, Nh�. Abrahamson, and N�. Lloyd 9nith, 716 Maple Park Court, who had also submitted a lette� regarding the drainage problems, were present for the discussi�. Mr. Wacker stated that he has seen the feasibility study on pro- posed street and drainage improvements prepared in 1979. He acknowledged that he is aware of the history and project rejection but advised the Council that the Abrahamsons are suffering hard- ship due to the lack of drainage controls, and gave the Council several exam�les of those problems. He stated that Mr. Abraham- son would like the City to construct a total in�rove�nt project in the Ivy Falls First Addition, including curb and gutters on the cul-de-sac. Mr. Smith indicated to the Council that he would only support a complete project and felt that there should be some Council discussion which would result in a solution to the problems suffered both by the Abrahamsons and himself. Mr. Abrahamson advised the Council that whenever there is a heavy rain, water comes down the cul-de-sac and heads directly towards his front door and he must sweep the water away to avoid damage to the first floor of his house. He asked the Council to take some action to resolve the drainage problems. Counci]man Losleben pointed out that not only is drainage, but the streets are also in very poor condition. He suggested that the Council direct preparation of a new feasibility study. Mayor Locicwood moved the adoption of Resolution No. 82-`.� , "RESOLUTION AUTI-IORIZING AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY STUDY F1�R IVY FALLS FIRST ADDITION DRAINAGE AND STRF��'I' IMP�VII"IENTS," directing that the City Engineer collect and study data prepared in 1979 and make a recorm�ndation to the Council at the August 3rd meeting. Counci]man Losleben seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 AIRPORP LAND USE Planner John Shardlow was present to review and update the COMPATIBILITY PLANNING Council on the airport land use compatibility planning process. Mr. Shardlow advised the Council that Mendota Heights cannot live with what is currently being proposed by the Metropolitan Council staff and that he will represent the City at the July 27th Transportation Subcomnittee meeting. Councilman Losleben suggested that the City try to initiate a meeting of the Joint Airport Zoni.ng Board. CONIMISSION Mayor Lockwood advised the Council that Planning Commission APPOINTN�NT member Kevin Howe has submitted his resignation from the Commissio: He reconrriended that Mr. M.J. Morson, Sr., 1442 Wachtler Avenue, be appointed to serve the balance of the tenn. Mayor Lockwood moved that N.�. M.J. Morson, Sr., be appointed to the Planning Commission, the term to commence imnediately and to expire on January 31, 1985. Ayes: 3� Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Nays: 0 � Page 1676 July 20, 1982 �"NBSCELLAND'JUS The Council acknowledged a memo from the City inistrator on housing, and directed that a copy be sent to th Planning Commis s ion Chairnian . TRAILS The Council acknowledged a memo and copy of a p posed joint AGREII�NT trails maintenance agreement between Dakota Co y and the City, relative to joint City/County maintenance of th Marie Avenue . bike trail. Counci]man Losleben moved to authorize and dire the appropriate City officials to execute the joint maintenance agreement. Councilwoman Witt second�d the motion. ' Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 FIRE STATION The Council acknowledged receipt of a r�mo from he City ARCHITECT Administrator along with a chart on accLunnulate scores of SELECTION the several inforn�al architectural proposals fo the proposed fire stat ion . ' It was the concensus that the top three fii�ms, ossen-Wright & Associates, Architectural Alliance, and Rober Burow Architects be requested to submit forn�al propos ls and be invited to an interview process on August 24th. Councilman Losleben moved that a special meetin be conducted at 7:30 P.M, for the purpose of interviewing ar hitectural can- didates. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 MENDOTA Councilir�an Losleben moved the adoption of Reso INTERCHANGE "RESOLUTION SUPPORTING A'�NIbTA INTERCHANGE AND FUNDING." Counci]man Hartmann seconded the motion. Aye: 4 Nays: 0 MAC AREA City Attorney Winthrop advised the Council that STREET has received title to property within the MAC a� VACATION may now take action on the request from MAC to � the MAC area. I-� reminded the Council that wher hearing was conducted on April 6th, action was c Mn/DOT acquisition of their maintenance facilit� Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Reso � "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING VACATION OF CERTAIN ST OF GARDENVILLE REARRANGF�NT A1VD SOU'1'H LANES ." Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 tion No. 82-59, RGING EARLY since Mn/DOT ea, the Council acate streets wit the vacation elayed pending site. ion No. 82-60, TS IN THE PLATS �� r � Page 1677 July 20, 1982 KE��,�NI'.l�K 'Iize Council acknowledged receipt of a capy of a EASE[�iT A�torney Tcm Ha�e-t ta Attarney Patrick Farrell r� the still unsettled ease�tent nego�iations betw� Michae]. and Deborah Krajniak. Ci�.y At�orney Wi: the Council that we�lands Aennit approval of th{ proper�y was subjec� to �.heir granting of an ea. not yet l�n re�eived. He stated that appropri, City, as referred ta i.n �he letter, mi.ght Ia� de: extension of the e,xpired wetl.ands pennit, that choase to get a cc�urt o�er to alla� the City t� drainage improvements necessi�ated by the filli� a�sessing � Krajniaks �or � work, or scme o� acticn. SEAL CCYaT1NG Ayes: 4 Nays : 0 et�r frccn ative ta . the City and hrap rerninded �he Kra�niak �nent which has e action by the al of any e City may perfornt �the � o£ the site, er type of It was the concensus of �he Cotmcil that the Ci Attorney be direct�cl to noti.fy the prt�perty osnmers that unle s the easemez�t is granted as was a condition of �he wetlands pe i� approval, the City wi11 pursue 1ega1 actiQn. Ca.ty Eng�neer Kishel presented plans and speci 1982 seal coating project and reca�nended -�hat aut-horize ad�er�isen�nt �or bids . CaLmcilman Losl�ben moved to authorize advexti. to be received on August 2nd at 10.00 A.M. for Cou¢�cil�cnan Hari�r�ann �econded i:he zt�tion. ti.c�s �or the Council for bids �eal. coa.tinc}. SSES Public Works Directctr Danielson recc�mer�ded Caun il adc�p�ian af a praposc�d resolu�ian authorizing preparatica�. of a sewex sy�tem evaluation study for Dis-trict No. 3. 'S`rea.surer haughnessy revi�ed hi.� men� relative to f�nancing of �he �-3y and possible financing iar a potential project to resolve the I/T problems in the Distric�. Council�� Losleben maved the adc�atiari of �soiu ion Na. 82-61, "RESOLUTION ALl'I'�iQRIZING CITY STAFF TO PREPARE S SYS'I�Ni EVALUATIQN 5TUDY." Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays : 0 MI5CEL��US Treasurer Shaughnessy reviewed and responded ta press relea� on the City's fi�cal health prepared and su�unitt to the Stiin Newspaper by t-he Sf.a�e Audifi�r . CABLE CCMNLZSSION The Caunci]. acknawledged and discuss� a mema proposed reso- lu�ion fran the Ci�ty Clerk recc�nn�nding' approval of �:he Narthern Dakota Coun�.y Cable Catani�sion budget which incl es a$3,000 contribution by fihe City. . After discussian, Council��an Losleben move�i the dop�.ion of Resoluti� No. $2-62, "RESOLUTION APPRCIVING NO DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE CCl'��+�lUNICATZONS CON�2LSSIUN BIJI�GEI' AND AL]TFI4 ZING TTFtANSFER Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 OFFICE EQUIPMENT Page 1678 July 20, 1982 OF FUNQS . "� Counci]man Hartmann seconded the motion. The City Clerk reviewed her memo recorrrr�nding City purchase of a Canon NP300F copier. She and Treasurer Shaughnessy explained financing options and recoim�nded direct purchase of the unit. After discussion, Counci]man Losleben moved to authorize the purchase of a Canon NP 500 copier from International Office � Systems, Inc., for a purchase price of $6,241.50. • Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 � ASSESSMENT Councilman Hartmann moved the adoption of Resolution No. 82-63, HEARINGS "RFSOLUTION CALLING FOR HEARING ON ASSESSN�NT ROLLS FOR NORTHLAND DRIVE/N�NDOTA HEIGHTS INDUSTRIAL PARK IMPROVII�IENTS ( IMPI3�VII�lENT NO. 81, P�JECT NO. 6), NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY STOF�'I SEWER IMPROVII"IEN'I'S ( IMPROVII�IENT NO. 82 , PROJECT NO. 5) AND MICI-IAEL S. I�iJPONT ADDITION IMPROVEMENTS ( INh�1�VE�NT NU . 81, PROJECT NO. 8)," the hearings for the Northland Drive and Northern States Power Corrq�any improvements to be conducted on August 17th, and the Dupont Addition hearing to be conducted on September 7th. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 1983 BUDGET CLUB LIQUOR LICENSES Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Ay�s: 4 Nays : 0 Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. On the recorrmendation of the City Clerk, it was the concensus of the Council that a special meeting be held on August lOth to consider departrr�ntal budget requests for 1983. Mayor Lockwood moved that a Club Liquor license be issued to the Somerset Country Club. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Councilwoman Witt moved that a Club Liquor license be issued to the Nlendakota Country Club. Counci]man Hartmann seconded the motion. LIQUOR T�e Council reviewed and discussed a draft of a proposed ORDINANCE on and off sale liquor ordinance. Several changes were suggested, and further discussion was tabled to August 17th. 911 AA70URN Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 �, Police Captain Lange gave a brief slide presentation on the "911" err�rgency telephone system. There being no further business to come before the Council, Council- man Losleben moved that the meeting be adjourned. Counci]man Hartmann seconded the motion. TIN� OF AA70URNMENT: 10:53 o'clock P.M. ATTEST: �"� Robert G , Lockwc�od � Mayor Page 1679 July 2Q, 19$2 Kathleen M. Swari�on City Clerk _ „ ' .._.._.r... ._._.�.�._.... ... ....,..� .Dept 1q�Admin__-- . ��,Pt, I5 Engr CLAIMSLIST 8/3/82 CHECK REGISTER �Q Police 30 �'ire. 'qUNT VEI�OCR ITEM DE�C��T�� 399.45 �ARTOtV ASGHF�AN ASSOC RE RRCRC)SS 4/1�3-6/44 , � 3�39.45 ._*__. _. 5t70.Gt3 B�UMBE�2G �'�I�TO SDG�vO AUD20 VIEWER SIGIFT . 75.QD •" 8�.i;�fBERG �H#1T0 Sf1U�iD 8AL AUDIQ VIE�iER � 7 5 .0 Q � -- __ - - _ _ . -- - 2r104_.fi.0__,,� ._ __._CAILY&SO(�S BIKT{1P SVC RPR , 2e10t}.w0 * . 33at�{l ____ LELNARD ENORESEn LETTERING Sp CARS 3 3 . Ci �} : * , 98.23 £L£CTROIVIC C�ITR IiUC OURAC�'i.� �8.23 *__.- - - �35.Qii KREMER SPRIN��ALIGh RPR P/S CON"iROL �35.t��3�� -- - _ 2�.51__._____.___..__��.LER PRiNTING.--.I�IC _ 7INE SHEETS . b.84 MIi.LER �RIN7ZNG IRfC TT_ME SHEETS 6.84 MILLER PRINTFNG iNC TIHE SHEETS 33Q�56--- '___ MILLER PRINIIAG__SNC. ._ NISC FORMS 3.56..16 NiILER PRINTIAG INC MI�C FORMS 6.84 MSl.LER PR2NIING INC TiMME SfiEEFS 727.7.5__.* __ .�.. _ _.._ _ .�_.... --...__ s2.!�� . �ct�c �co c��r ��c�'o�r g2.� o * L..25 LAWTON PRTG INOEX TABS ACCTG 8:25 * 42..�-U - -- - - 42.;3 (# * AIR COMM INC � AUG CONTR 13..53�__.___... _ 8Q �iATER COMM,ISSIQN_ . 2�1D QTR 2344 _DQOD 16.81 BD 1�ATER COMM�LSSIt1N �itR READINGS 122.66 " BD iiATER COMHi5�I0N JUN ENGR TiME 8l3.5�.00 ______....,.._B_D,�1�IATE�t CONNISSIAN . .___SUC_ CON.t�.. CHGS--- ------- _ 242.18 80 WATER CONP9ISSIC1fV .1UN Et�GR TIME 8•54�.1$ * i�s�i� ,_..».. I1�6�'J * BR�?�fN ff'NOTO ,,. .. _ CITY N.OT{#R �UFPLY TANK TRK/'AIftPORT DiSC PADSfSEALS �'! O-Road&Bridges "" 0 Utility � E�: 0 Parks • _ 0 Planning �. �`- ACGOUN7 N0+ I"N1 �? ��'�� t��°� l� C1-216�-G�ti-�U �,1-4b20-� 3C-.3v � �5-433�3-a81�-6f� G1-433G-44p-2�� c � ;1-43�5�� 3£i-3. c�1-433�-46p-3� U1-43� �-D 20-2� ' � 3-43�3 �3-i3 50-5C (ii-43vf�-J�0-7p �i-43Jii-2iA-3� �`�' �;z' �5-43t�5-1�5-15, r-j 35-43J t�-t? 6ti-ot1 � � �—��; 2—� aa— Zo U1-43u�-110-1C�. ::: _ .. W_..._._._._ 3 u1-4330-45�-2Q� .0.1-4425-335.-3� 15-43pS-fl6�i-bfl� 75-4233.-949-�iU _75� # �'t6 0..-`��9 -.�L 77—az3�—��—or� �.� i-4490-Q_3�-3 �1-433tt-44Q-2�i '�!OUN T 3�'.48 42.2t! _ I2b.83 Y* 215�:6#3 .._ 15.95 .__ .. 5.5t1 7,�7D 21 .2 � _ -- - -- 24.35 7.7U 2�38.�Q * 22.bS 12.55 . ._ �.2Q 4+75 5.10 ..� �.��____ 4� «75 +� � � p762.5L� 2rI05.v�Q 2 � E?67.5i3 * _. 9.t� �.� � _._...._ 90 .Q �' * 18�.(3t' 18Q.�G * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR CITY N.OTOR SUPPLY �CITY N07C� SUPPl,Y COAI� DUF'!. PRODtlC7S COPY QUPL PRODUCTS COPY nUPL PROOUCTS C CFY CUPI PR CdUCTS CO�Y CUFL PRODUCTS COF'Y CUPl. PRpDt1CTS COPY G'UP� PRC?DUCTS CQFY EQUIP CO CCPY EQ�TP CC COFY E4UIP CQ COFY Et�U�P CO CDPIf E�UIP C13 CCFY EQti�'P CC GCR GCRJ�• DCR CURP. ��iY�l � Ui.��tJ1i� JOiiNS CN OR V I4. �20..24 __.._._.__._.._- -KI SH� L. EDWARD 1.10. KISli�L E041AR0 __ ,_ . 1.32__...__ ..__ __ KI �NE L ECibl ARD 1.9;3 KTSHEC, ED�IARD 4.84 KI�t#ct ECi�lARO 29.�h8 � T '�s�2 �-- - 5.� 6 1;.2� - - 1.32 - - 2.2�f KNIJTH TOM KNUTH T01� _ KNUTH i(iM !(NUT'� T CN! 1�NlITI�! T{lNi �� _ ITEM D�SCRIPTION _ ACCOUNT_N.O. T,N{, PR IMER/THINNER ? 5-43�? 5-� 6 Q N!I�C SPLYS _ 15-433ii-#9�3-5!'I JUL RENTIJUi� Ct�PIES �1.-42J0-bi4-i#i JUL RENi JUN_ �QPIES_._.._. OI-42S3s1-b2,�-2�-- JUl. REN1'tJllfi2E CJPI ES (31- 42u tI-61�1-��i JU1. R£NTl,�UN� COPIES t�1-42�0-61D-8G JUL R�IVTtJUNE G4PIES i12-43;2i3�-f�4�-4� f� JUI. RENTlJUNE COPIES �5-42at3-63C1-15 JUL RENT/JUNE COPxES 23-42�`I�-UOtl-t24� BL�CK�.ZN� FIINM C��-43�5-�2�-2G BLACKLINE FILM _ -_. _ n1-442.3-i35(i-5�i-- MZ4C S!�l.YS t�5-�3flt�-ZQ5-15 VEL.L�1M 63-43'J�5-8p4-G�} il�FiOX BOtVO . -. _...._._.._.._ 75-431�.5_944--Q�-- f�AGZ N� TAPE 78-43�I.5-8t31-0 G AUG RENT _, p1-�q�RO-btiL __ RUG REN7 �5-�,2(?�3-b0�-.�� __. ________._AU� N1I -- .._.__.___... _...___._ ..._�,1�-443.5-�21-�Q__ AUG MI BAI. JUL �1-�41'5-i1D-1G __._._._ -- MI THRU 7/��____.._.---_ —.-.._.L��15-�.fl5-15^ � MI 7HRU 7127 b3-44i5-St�3-�}Q _._..___ _ __.__ .MI TNRLI 7I�7 __..__.__._____...._�Z�?~441_5-9�t�=�t1_._ MI TF#RU 7127 77-4�t� 5-951-�r C , MI THRU 7I27 78-44i 5-801�� C MI THRU 7128 MI THRU 7/28 MI THRU 7128 MI THRU 7/28 M� THRU 7128 -- .__._� .. -� 1-422 t�-125 i �-- 15-�4i 5-4 76- _ 63-44�.5-8ti3-+:!�,_ 63-441. 5-SQ 4-CS Q a5- �t415�-9 #9-{3 � CHECK REGIS7ER NOUNT VEN�OR 11.66 KNUTH TON _. 3 8.5 i� .... _.. k(� U T'H T C M _ 76.56 * 4.88 KULIA�DER GUY ,_._.__E.36____._ KULlA1�DER GUY 4.1-.5 KULLA WOER GU Y 4.84 KULLA �DER GU Y 4.8�_ _ _ KUi.LAA'DER GUY 2.20 KULLANDER GUY 2 s.30 * 1L�8_.�30 _ LELS 10 L..O Q * ITEM D�5CRIPTION MI THRU 7/28 MI THRI! 7/28 FIN STMT COVERS MI THRU 7/2b . MI THRU 7/26 MI THRU 7//2b MI TF9RU 7/26 MI THRU 7/26 AUG UD 4.3,8 LEEF BROS INC JULY SUC 4.D9 � LEEF BROS INC JUL1f SUC 4.08 IEEF EROS INC � T JULY SIJC 400..8 LEEF BROS INC JULY SVC _� 4.0,9__ _.. _ LEEF BROS INC _ __ JULY SVC 4.08 LEEF @RCS INC JULY �VC 24.50 * ' ACCOUNT N0. ItVU �7-4�1 5-951-� 0 78-441 �-8�51-4�� - --- �11-43�] t��l 1Q -1i3�+ . . . U1-443.�-i1t�-1fl! 15-44917-� b0-6(} 7:}-4415-944-��, 71-4415-945-�C 78-4415-SO1-OC _ f, �J1-2075-000-,Ot}� µ C1-4335-05Q-5� .__Q 1-4335-0 50,-,5� T ^ E}1-4335-D70-70� O 1-4335-fl?0.- 701 ? 5-4335-�_60L_b�_ 15-4335-�i 6�-6! _470.10_J___.__ NEO CNTR HEALTH_ __ . AU& INS_N/H _.__,,.__.� 645.45 M�D CnTR HE�lLTt9 AUG F'REM 214.45 M�D CNTR HEALTH AUG PREM 38q.95 NED C �TR HEALTi� .__, AUG i'REM _, 2�8.90 NED CNTR HEALTH AU+G PREM 3b3.85 NEO CNTR H�ALTH AUG PREM ___410.�5.�_., NED C11TR HEALTH . AU� PREM _ 115.�iD N�D CNTR HEALTH AUG PREMM 2�81�.i5 * --- �_,1- 2 LI.? 4�_i��Q.�� D 1- 4245-� 2D -�20 Q 1- 424 5-0 21-2►� _ 01-�245-050�5Q_ Q 1- 424 5-� 7D r 7� (3 I- 42 45-1 19s 1£� � 5-4245-Z 05-15_ 15-4245-Q 6�-6U 22� P40.52 _�__METRO WASTE CdNTROL .__ _ AUG_ INS7_._�___.__--_- -.._._,__�_ ..�1�-��±49-�bQ—bO 22��4l;052 * .. .-----._._ _ _ _ ..._ ..... - -- -_ _ _. _ .. _._ __.._._ .__.. _. . - ---. _._ 27.75 h1IfVN 6ENEFIT ASSN AiJG PREM ili-2G74-DOD-DC 10.01J, , HI�N BENEFIT ASSN._ AUG PREM ,+�1-2075-Q00-3I, +37.75 * 261.84 �ORTHERN ST POf�ER CO JULY SVC ( 01-4211-300- �� CNECK REGISTER �!OUNT ' VF�DOR 110.62 KO�iTHER�; ST P441ER CO 110.61 �NORTHERN ST P06lER CO 70.95 � I�GRTHERN ST PONER CO 32.91 �ORTHER� ST PC11ER CO 156.61 ' AORTHERi� ST PO�IER CO 2D.�8 nOKTHERl4 ST PONER CO 20.98 NG'RTHERh ST PObfER CO Id8a02 i�ORTNFRN ST POWER CO 27.b2� V�� ORTHERN S7 P041ER CO 110.62 AORTH�'R11 ST PCIdER Ca 19"e.76 NGRTHERfV ST PO4tER CO '2fl.98 � NORTHERN 5T P01dER CO 1 � 245.5� * 339.39 42.92v 59.b9 _ 165.76 245.35 63.79 50 6.11 1�423.01 * i30.3� 7b.� C 2DE.OQ * 31.42 2q.25 �_� �5.b7 * � __ __ . .. . _. _. _ �. �__.___�-.._ --- �--_ ITEM DESCRIPTION JULY SUC JULY SUC JULY SVC �U�Y SUC JULY SVC _ .9ULY SUC JULY SUC . JULY SVC _ _ JULY SVC JULY SVC JULY SUC JULY 5UC _ NORTNb1ESTERN EEL� JULY SUC NORTfi4iESTERN FELL JULY SUC IUOPTH4�ESTERN EEI.L JUl.Y SVC _ (VORTHii��TERN EELL __ _ __ JULY SUC_ NORT}�I�ESTcRN EELL JUIY SUC " NORTHWESTERN B�'LL �ULY SVC NORTHWESTERN BELL _____� __ JULY SVC_ ACCOU�17. N0.__I_f�V �2-4221-31� � 01-42i1-31'J_.�_� ii_. Q1-42i1-3I5-30 C 1- 4211-32�- 7 0 S11-4211-4.2��519 t31�4212�310d5C� fl1-4212-31D-7a �i1-42i2-��5-3.C�_ �51-4�3.2-32Q-7G 15-4211-3i0-b0 15-42I1-4_00-6� 15-42i2-31Q-60T -- __[31-4210.-J,21,-2C� - --- - - - -- - -- t� 1- 4 210 - s7 3Q - 3 � �71-4220-4 50-5� - -- - -�-- --•-� -fl I-4210-a 7.��.�?�_ G 1- 4210-11D � 1Q � 5-4210-105:-15 -- -.�___.._-- --.-.---15-4210-3 bOT6D._... OAK CREST KENNELS RET/CALLS JULY 01-4221-800-90 CAK CREST KENNELS BdARD _ __ _ t71-4225-8C30-9{? _ tXYGE � SERVI CE CO 2/CYL COMP A IR � 1-4305-ii 30-3�i .._ CXYGE n SERVI CE CO ._ __._ �__ _OXY/ACET-- -- -__._�__ .___..._._....._�1-43i� 5-� 56-_5C_ � 15.9t3 FAYLESS CASHWAYS I�VC aOGDCRFT . f31-�3D5-G7G-7G -- 16.9� _ FAIfL�SS CASH�IAYS INC_-_ - MI�C SFLYS--_ ---_---__._v__G2-430,5,-Q�Q-7(l_ 3 2 . 8 4 * - - -- . _.� _ -- 31..5C FI�E BENC PAV�N� INC WEAR MIX 01-4421-65�J-5G ; 31.50 * __-- _ -- - --- - -- -� - - -- _�_- -- - -- - _ _ ._ - -_. . _. .-�- � - - ----- ------- -- 206.50 POWER BRAKE EQUIP CO STROE3E �.IGHT 1�-462D-0 60- "0 , 1D6.5i?. POWER BRAKE EQUIP CO S7ROBE iIG�iT 15-4b20-066 � 213.t30 * 40 U N T _ __ 8.34 8.34 16.68 * 35.�_i3 _ 35.i J * 16.98 _ 16.98 16.99 5C .95 * 1�35�.D0 1 • 35� .� fl * , 89.62 __ 89.62�* 2.�a 1b.48 %s�% 26.39 * Ct1ECK REGISTER VENOOZ S&T OFFICc �RCO S8T OFFIC�" �ROD SELANOER DUANE C SEVEN CORNER ACE HDk� SEVEN CORNER ACE HDN SEUEN CORNER ACE HCW SHAUGHNESSY L E JR SHIELY J l CO iTEM DESCRIPTiON TONER TON�'R AUG MI PAINT SPRAYER PAINT S�RAYER PAINT SPRAYER JULY SVC '� 1 ACCOUNT N0._INVj, G 1- 43�1 v-1 lc�_-1a : :?5-43JB-205-15 � � 1- 4�t15-200 -_7U j- �?1-43� 5-�50-50 : ui-43fJ5-0�0-7C : 25-43�3 5-a 60�60 � ti1-422Q-i32-10 _ FILL SAND/CL 2KEY_._ ._.__ _�.__15-�33t1-48Q-6�.�� SNYDER DRUG ST�RES CLARlNAPKINS �J1-430�-110-It; E SlVYDER DRUG STORES FILM/PAINT 01-43U5-�320-20 i SNYDER ORUG STORES PICTURE FRAMES i: 1-4490-� 30-3�. E 16.6G STARR OFF SUCS . MISC S�LYS '"01-�3U0-023-2G " 16.6fl * .._.._.- - - �- - � . . 1,772.99 STpTE TREASURER �ERA W/H 7i23 PR L'1-2062-D�0-Q� 1�139.31 S7ATE TREASURER PLRA 7l23 PR �1-44�6-J20-2G 447.9� STATE TREASUR�R PERA 7/23 PR :1-44.�6-021-2C 15.Si1 STATE TREASURER PcRA 7/23 PR L1-44�36-:330-3C 48.61---.� -. STATE 7REASURER � . �---- PERA 7/23 PR . . - �?-44'46-340-40 192.86 STATE TREASURER P�RA 7/23 PR C1-44�b-�50-5+� 112.^ �1--`.--_- -- STATE TREASURER___-,-- -_�PERA 7/23 PR _.___.._.........__._.......�1-44� 6-�_30-7� _ 1bG.! 6 STATE TREASUFtER PERA 7/23 PR a1-44�7 6-1ad-1Q 130..48 STATE TREASURER PcRA 7/23 PR [i1-44� 6-110-1D 245.66 STATE TREASURER PERA 7/23 PR +.�5-44i16-i05-15 - -. --. - --._ _- -- -. ._._........_ _. _ _._._- - - ___ _. __.._ __._..___ _ ...__ - .__ .. _..__. _ 69.38 STATE TREASURER PERA 7/33 PR 15-44�6-060-6fl. 4,334.85 * 2'979.53 ____. �_ ST TREAS SS CON FUNO __ JULY FICA 4�/H 84.42 ST TREAS SS CON FUNO JULY FICA 177.b5 ST TREAS SS CON FUND JULY FICA G1-2i763-GG�-G _._ _.. . V1-44J.8-�321-2 ;�1-44� 8-f3 4�-4 �!OUNT CHECK REGISTER VENDGR ,_� .._ .__._.. _ ITEM aESCRiPTIQN 724.26 ST TR�'AS SS GC3N FUND JULY FICA 3�3+�0 ST TR£AS aS CGIV FUND JULY F2CA �447.8�� v� ST TREAS SS CON FUND JUt,Y FICA 914.l�3 ST TREAS SS CON �'UNO JULY FICA 237«? 7 � S7 TREAS 5S CtIN �UiVD Jt3E.1' F7[CA 5 w 959.�! b �*- - ------- _. .,_.._.._,_. _ __ _ 5.2T 5.27 * 10 9 . 4 0---- l�i 9.4� * �UN NEtdSPAPERS S .__�: ; ACCOUN7.N0._InV i:1-44�.8-0 �L 1 �?-44U8-�37Q-7Q_ CZ^-4�� 8-].13alti G�-44t� 8-1d5� 15 _ �.s—�� a-� �,a�._.�o NOT ANN BD REVI£W �?1-424C-110-1fi ___UNITED WAY-ST PAUL -._- -- "AU� CON7T .�._ _.._.. .__..._ . �1-2G7q-Q�3D-0l� ---98s52 ___..__.....:fASH_IlATIONA� IRS CO ---- AUG IN5_4J/N__ _..... _.__... �1.-2�74-QCiA_:�?.��._- 22tD.�?� b�ASN i�A720NAL INS CO AUG INS PREPi L�1-4245-s72�J-2t3 158e73 Ia(ASH NATIONAL IiVS CO A1,1G IN$ PREM O1-4245-�2X.�20 ll�l:�fl � 6�ASH AATI+3NAC. iNS CO AUG IiUS PREM iil-�2�5-�4�-90 4`�.'i3 �----__- WA�H 11ATi4NAL It�S. ��__�.__..AtJG INS f'REM__ _..____ _...___�1-4245-05Q-50 llfl.�.t� 4lASH NATIO�fA� .INS CO AUi INS P�E� t#1-�245-310-�Q llfl e�il_.__.._. _. b'A�H AA7ICINAL IfiS_CO-.-----AUG _iP1S PREM_._._. ---..__._._ �.._ A5-4245-1515 _ 855.98 * 1133.49 W�LLS FARGO TRUS7EE dUG LTD&L W1H 27.49 �fELiS FARG{} TRUS3EE AUG PREM _ _..26.13 __ __ _...---..�'�,LLS FARGO TRUSTEE__._.__ AUG PREM----.�^__..._...___._.. __._._.. 28.$9 �i�'LLS FARGO TRUSTEE Ail� PREM 176.5� * 99t�.i2-�_... _ ._. �I�THR{lPb�c.IIUGTINE&S LEG SUC VAIV._C.ANO____.....- .-- 1.50J.QQ �d2NTHR0�W�INSTIhE�S 2ND QTR RET 4v5'92.45 NINTNROPiJEZNSTIN�&S FRDS 412-613�3 235.0�.. �.µ_ WINTHROPME�NS7TNE&S - -----LE� S1IC �/1-6/3(3 /82 �----- 12�.�}Q �ZNTHRCPY�Eiiti�1'Il1E�S L�G SUC 411-6l3t� - �25.�Ci ._�..__iiI,NTH_R_OPI�EIN�TIAE&S,--------LES_SUCw.4l2,-bl3G_... _..___ _ b5.�fl NINTHROPWcINSTINE&S LEG SVC 4%1-6/3� 75.fli3 #iiNTFiRO#��iEINSTINE�S LE6 SVC 41I-�iT3Ct 115.qt3 l�INTHR0�11EINSTINE�S HEG SUC 4/1-6/3Q _ __.__�_ �. ._-- ._. _. _ .. ___... .. __ ._._._- - - -----__. �___---..._..__ 95.A�fi �#INT�Rt�P�EEINSiINE&S LEG SUG �I1-613tI 3,985.14 1�INTHRGFW�INSiIAE&S LEG SVC 4�1�-66/3i1 _225.t1D____. _. _ . _uIl�TtiR4FNEIN5iINE&S_^. __ _.LE�E SVC 4I1-b1313 _.._v..__.._ �77.�� 41INTHROPWEINSTINE&S LE� SUC 4/1-5/30 75.t7B I�Il4THROFIIEINSTINE&S l.E G SUC 4/2-b/3fl i2�779.61 * __ ____._., �. __ _,. .___ _.,._.._ ...... � .. - -- --- � - , -- ._ ..._. C�1--2G74-OAD-t�t1 i31-4 2�t 6-{I 2D � 20 R1.-'42p�b-�5'�rSG' : iI 3.- 424 5-�? 7�3 - 70 : 01-4220-120-8t3� O 1 � 4221-12p - 3.0 � 1- 422 2-1,2� � 2�._. 1C�-�422t3-].20-O�i 23-422�=22Ci-Li {3 37-422�-.9G16-Q.�__ 42-422�l-914-C{3 �2-422i3-92�-t10 b3-4220-804-QA 74-4220-919-t3 �3 75-422i1-9a9-ti�i 76-4220-95Q -t? �# 77-422d3-95i- __. 78-422i�-8t11- CHECK REGIST�R �DUNT _ � VENDO? ITEM OESCRI�TION ,fl19.09 FUNC �? TOTAL 5�267.�2 FUN[I it5 TOTAL 2'�5.3i, FUNC Z�3 TOTAL 26r632.79 . FUNC 15 T�TAL 132.Tt3 FUNC 23 T�TAL 325�.�JD FUNQ 37 TOTAL 1�iT.�J�t FUND 42 T�TAL 135..37_ _ _ FUNQ 63 TQTAL 6.26 FUNC 7�i TOTAL 4.A4 FUNC 71 TOTAL 950'�� FUND 74 TOTAL 23,663.55 FUNO 75 TOTAL 22�.i!0 FUND 76 TOTAL 632.82 FUNC T7 TOTAL 122�94 FUNC 78 TOTAI • 92�437.28 TGTAL MANUAL CHECRS_ 10109 �L�.00 10110 ��`- � � 500.00 10111 12,900.00 "^112 20.00 .13 5,050.74 i�114 200.00 10115 __ 430.00 10116 �79.00 10117 20,615.02 39,814.76 $ 122,252.04 E.J. Trophies Womens Softball Trophies US Post Office Refill Postage Meter Boyer Ford Truck Fire Dept Truck HCBA . Tuition Mertensotto,Danielson DirInternal REv FIT W/H 7/23 Dakota Cty StBk Payroll Savings 7/23 State Capitol Cr Un " �� „ City Mend Hghts Pr Net Payroll 7f23 � r+� �� ACCOUNT N0. I(�1 CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL - AUGUST 3RD, 1982 L.W.T. Cement Construction, Inc. Stocker Excavating Genz-Ryan Plumbing & Heating Company Floodmaster Engineering Corporation Forbes Construction Company, Inc. Hanson Homes, Inc. Hass/McNamara Construction Dale M. Johnson Engineering & Const. Lissick Construction Don Miller Construction Darryl Thayer & Associates Swanson Plumbing & Heating, Inc. Donaho Roofing Superior Pool Builders, Inc. Concrete License Excavating License Gas Piping License General Contractor's License General Contractor's License General Contractor's License General Contractor's License General Contractor's License General Contractor's License General Contractor's License Heating and Air Cond itioning Heating and Air Conditioning Roof ing License Swimming Pool Installation L' �icense �icense ;ense TO: City Coun; il FROM: Paul R. Berg Code rnforcement Ofiicer ' SUB,7ECT: Building Ac:.ivity Re�ort for July, 1982 CURREPIT P;ON`iH NO. VALU�'1TION �'F E �OLI�FCTE� BiDG PEi�:•IITS � sr� 3 $352,850.81 $2,365.65 C/z 3 36,400.00 483.36 �tlsC. 30 100,163.88 1,424.61 sub Total 36 $489,414.69 $4,273.62 TRD PERI�IITS �lbg 5 $ 117.00 tatr 11 55.00 Swr 1 17.50 Htg, A/C & Gas Pipe � 309.50 sub Total 24 $ 499.00 r,z�vrtSIr1G Co:�tractor' s Licenses 18 _ $ 450.00 TOTAL 78 $489,414.69 $5,222.62 M�,_ DATr: July 27, .1982 Y�,AR TO llATE - 1982 r:0 • �JALUATIO:i � Ei COLLECTEC � � 27 $2,669,091.10 $18,834.24 � 16 2,604,850.00 12,327.07 I 91 471,499.38 5,220.22 I 134 $5,745,440.48 $36,381.53 28 40 25 44 137 176 $ 701.00 200.00 437.50 4,411.00 $ 5,749.50 $ 4,400.00 447 $5,745,440.48 $46,531.03 YE�1R TO DATE - 1981 N0. VF1LliATION FEi: COLLECTED 31 $2,164,337.77 $20,255.81 6 852,031.36 4,739.56 112 568,050.14 11,703.33 149 $3,584,419.27 $36,698.70 32 30 33 49 144 173 $ 619.00 258.00 576.50 2,173.50 $ 3,627.00 3,875.00 466 $3,584,419.27 $44,200.70 NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect Qnly permit, �lan check fee and valuation amounts. e CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESQTA RESOLUTION N0. 82- RESOLUTIQN ESTABLISHING FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING PROPOSED IiSE HEARING WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heigh�s receives Federal Revenue hari,ng monies under the provisions of the State and Laca1 Assistance Act o 1972 (PI, 92-512} ; and W�iEREAS, PL 94-4$8, Fiscal Assistance Amendment of I976 amends the ori.ginal Act by including, among other items, additional public hea ing requirements; and WI3EREAS, it is the intent af the City afficials both to meet a 1 federal requ3.rements and to solicit citizen input on use of en�itle ent monies; NOW THEREFdRE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council. of the City of Mendota Heights, that a public hearing be established for discussio of proposed use of Federal Revenue Sharing manzes; and BE IT FURTIiER RESOLVED, that said hearing shall be conducted a 7.30 o'c].ock'P.M., on Tuesday, September 7, 1982. '� Adopted by the City Cauncil of the City of Mendota Heights this 3rd �day af August, 1982. ATTEST: Kathleen M, Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCTL CITY OF MENDOTA By Robert G, Lockwaod Mayar 0 m CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 27, 1982 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was cal] by Chairperson Kruse at 8:07 o'clock P.M. The following members were � Kruse, Burke, Frank, Blesener, Stefani and Morson. Butler was excused, present were Planning Consultant Howard Dahlgren and Public Works Direc Danielson. ed to order resent: Also tor Jim Planning Commission Chairperson Kruse proceeded to introduce Jerry orson, who was appointed to replace Kevin Howe on the Commission. His term will expire on January 31, 1985. � APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of the June 22 regular meeting had b with the agenda. Burke moved, seconded by B the minutes be avvroved as submitted_ vnt;,, Minutes of the June 29 special meeting had with the agenda. Stefani moved, seconded b the minutes be approved as submitted. Voti n submitted sener, that all aves. be n submitted y lesener, that HEARING, CASE ��82-10, Chairperson Kruse opened the meeting for the BASKFIELD, MINOR public hearing on an application from Mr. Bre CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 687 Decorah Lane, B1 4, Lot 5, Delaware�Cross AND VARIANCE allow a five foot high wrought iron fence to his property, Mr. Baskfield was present with the proposed fence for the commission members also passed along a note from his neighbor t Mr. Lance Moberg, who had no objection to the Mr. Kibort and Mr. Osterhus, two other neighb Baskfield, were also present and had no objec f ence . all ayes. urpose of a t Baskfield, ng, to e located on a section of to note. He the rear, proposed fence. rs of Mr. ions to the Mr. Baskfield reviewed the two main reasons f r desiring the fence for his property, they being for se rity reasons and to salvage the remaining portion of useab e yard space. He also elaborated on the security aspect for ember Stefani who was not present at the last meeting for t is discussion. Mr. Baskfield also distributed a list of other City violations ' regarding site obstructions at street intersections, noting that he didn't feel that he should have to mo his fence further back into his yard to a11ow site visibi�ity at the corner of his lot, especially since his fence ould be an open fence, constructed of wrought iron. Chairperson Kruse asked for questions or comme ts from the audience and one of Mr. Baskfield's neighbors poke in favor of the fence. Mr, Baskfield noted that he would be agreeablelto not placing plantings either in front of or to the rear of the fence, �i IP ., Planning Commission Minutes Page Two July 27, 1982 _ ,� i z so visibility would not be obstructed. There being no further questions or comments from the audienc�. Burke moved to recommend approval of the variance and . minor conditional use permit to allaw the five foat high ' wrought iran fence at 687 Decorah Lane, conditioned that na _ �lantings be permi�ted in the face of the fence in the front � yard, parallel to the front af �.he hause and 15 feet narthexly . along the side lot line and that it would not be more than 36 inches hi�h above the center line of the street. � Stefani seconded the motion. Vating; aI1 ayes. � CASE ��82-07, BALLARD, Dr. Ballard was present with a new drawing of the praposed � SIGN VARIANCE sign for his denta]. off ice. He noted tha� the total height of the sign is betweerz faur and five feet. He noted that � Mr. Stryker of the Bank had spoken to other tennants in the , building and no one else appeared interested in being on a .. Sign at �he presen� time. His sign would be 33 feet east of th�. drivEway on Sauth Plaza Drive, and six feet from the right-of- � way- line af South Plaza Drive, which would be the mast apprapriate locatian. � There bea.ng no further discussian, Stefani moved, seconded by Blesener, to recommend approval of a 24 foot varaance to allow a dental sign to be p�aced six feet from South Plaza Drive ti'oting: all ayes. CASE ��'$2-13, FEDERAL Mr. Vern Colon, from Federal Land, was present to request a LAND COMPANY, VARIANCE variance to allaw a Planned Unit Develapinent on 5.62 acres of 1and, the property being located on TH 13, westerly of Miriam Street. Mr, Colon noted that he had warked extensively with the neighbors to satisfy their concerns and he presented a getition with 22 signatures in favor af his townhouse proposal �� to the planning commission members. He noted that eight more signatures will be obtained in iavor of hi.s reques�, and that �hese peaple are an vaeation at the present time. Mr. Charles Bartholdi, attorney far Federal Land, was present and noted that there are two issues which he would address. , Qne issue was that of a substantial hardship, because �here was no other available land to purchase ta bra.ng the site up � �o the 10 acre minamum requirement for a Planned Unit Developmen The ather issue he wanted ta address was the satisfactory portio� af amenities being preserved under a PUD, which would not be preserved under sing3e family development. He also noted that storm waCer drainage is a unique problem for this site and stated that a PUD cortcept could relieve this graposal, if approvc He stated that a single family plan would not allow an area for a hol.ding pond but that drainage and on-szte prob�.ems would be remedied under a PtID. Also that the City would have cantrol over a PUD development, but would no� have control aver single family development. Mr. Bartholdi also nated that a PUD wauld preserve the site 1.ine af the existing homes in the area, wh.ere singl.e family homes could possibly be twa stories and 2S feet high. Under the PUD, they would be sing].e story and 14 feet high. Under Planning Cammission Minu�es Page Three 2?, 19$2 the townhouse proposal a halding pond and pu�ting green are grogosed and fencing and a swimming pool are eliminated. Mr. Bartholdi infarmed the commission members family hames are not readily selling at this a PUD with tawnhauses could be developed and start this fa1l. The density wauld be 16 uni per unit. The single family plan that was pr would have 11 single family hames with 4 pers for a density of 44 persons. versus 32 person that single ime, but that ould possibly s with '2 persans viously appraved as per unit, under a PUD. In summary, he no�ed that under a PUD the Ci� would have contro: over the development, a PUD woul.d salve the d ainage problem and with a PUD, the si.te and view lines of the ex'sting hames would be preserved. � � Mr. Scott Minmes, a landscape architect�with amon Farber, caas also present and spoke abaut the planting sch me for the szte. Mr. John Pope, architect for the project, wi.t Pope Associ.ates, nated that the scale af the buildings will be single family in character, Mr. Colon spoke again, noting that he had spa en with Mr. Jerry Shaughnessy, who resides direct2y behind one f the proposed townhouse units. Mr, Colon has agreed to swi g one unit away 50 feet in the rear and 20 feet in the front, so that the unit will not be directly in line with Mr. Shaughn ssy's hozne. The comFnissian mernbers questioned canstructia time, which would be approximately ane year irom start to compl tion of the project. The units wi1.1 be about 2,000 squar feet and wil2 cos� about $200,000. Mr. Co1on expressed concern with a holdir►g po�d under a single family developmen� ta drain existing homes in the area. After further discussion, Frank moved, sec recammend appraval af the variance from 10 for a Planned Unit Development for F�deral Voting: alI ayes. CASE ��82-14, GRYC, Mr, James Hi11 was present representing Berth� SUBDIVISION He noted that there are 24 acres in the parce7 proposing 43 single f amily lots. The propert� is located west af Dodd Road, north af Par 3 c south of Wentworth. They had originally propc Wachtler south from Wentworth to Bachelor but were not in favor of that idea so they are noC extend Wachtler sauth from a street named Eve� • which would tie into Dodd Road, south to Bach� Each of the lots meet �.he lOQ foat frontage re average 1ot size is 39,$55 square feet, with 1 at 15,500 square feet. Mr. Hill noted that a af land, Outl.ot A, could be deeded to the Cit� Wentworth in the future. by Stefani, to s ta 5.62 acres Camvanv. and Jim Gryc. and they are in question id one lat depth �ed extending .=he neighbars proposing ta ;reen Knoll, Lor Avenue. �uirement and the ie smallest 7.ot i0 foot wide strip for access to �� Planning Commission Page Four July 27, 1982• ,, Mr. Terry Raddatz, from Trail Road, wondered where the costs would be assessed, and he wanted to go on record to show that Wachtler and Trail should never connect. After a brief discussion, Stefani moved, seconded by Frank, to , set a public hearing for August 24th, the next regular Planning. Commission meeting. Voting: all ayes. ' CASE ��82-15, GETTY OIL, Mr. Phil Larsori, from Suburban Lighting, was present to request, SIGN VARIANCE a sign variance for Getty Oil, at 1906 Dodd Road. Surfco � Self-service gas station would like to install the new sign ' on the existing sign base in the same location. The variance � would be to allow a greater sign area than is presently in , place. There was some discussion as to the size and location o3 the price signs on the pylon and Mr. Larson stated that it . was his belief that Surfco would prefer to place the price sign: on the building, rather than delay action at this time. CASE ��82-16, SUBDIVISION & VARIANCE After further discussion, Frank moved, seconded by Morson, to recommend approval of a variance to allow a 46 square foot new sign and new standard without the price signs on a 15 foot pole. Voting: all ayes. - TUMINELLY, Mr. Tuminelly was present to request a subdivision to create three lots out of two existing lots at 1903 Hunter Lane, Lots 1 and 2, Culligan Knoll. He stated that he had had no previous discussion with Mr. Ted Van the abutting northerly property. Mr. Tuminelly noted that two of the lots will be 23,000 squar� feet and the third lot, with the existing home on, is 42,000 square feet. He also stated that a Homeowner's Association would provide plowing and maintenance for a 20 foot wide private drive in the site. Frank moved, seconed by Stefani, to set a public hearing for August 24th, for preliminary plat approval of the subdivision. Voting: all ayes. CASE #82-17, MINN. Mr..Thomas Balyk, was present to request permission FSL, SUBDIVISION to reduce f ive lots to 4 lots in Delaware Crossing. The lots are lots 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23, Block 3, and Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 2, Delaware Crossing. The lots were each platted in groups of five at approximately 10,000 square foot per lot. The applicant now proposes to enlarge the lots by talcing two groups of f ive lots and replatting them into four larger lots, to accommodate larger residential structures. 7.tao of the new lots will still contain less than the minimum required square footage. There was discussion as to how to increase the square footage of these two smaller lots b�. adjusting lot lines. After further discussion, Blesener moved, seconded by Burke, to recommend approval of the subdivision, subject to making the two lots meet the 15,000 square foot requirement, and waivin� the public hearin� reauirement. Voting: all ayes. CASE 4�82-18, MINN. Mr. Balyk, from Balyk and Associates, was present for this FSL, VARIANCE discussion, along with Mr. Robert McKinstry, Assistant Secretary for Minnesota FSL Corporation. They were present e y Planning Commission Minutes VERBAL REVIEW Page Five J to request a variance for the house located Lot 4, Block 4, Delaware Crossing. This hom constructed by August Construction before th in�and it was placed too close to the prope home is adjacent to Mr. Baskfield's in the r Baskfield noted that the porch roof of 682 0 over into his property. After some discussi were directed to return with an accurate sur correct lot lines and placement of the home, was also to be advised that this would be on This matter was continued to August 24th. Public Works Director Danielson reviewed the gone before the City Council for action. 27, 1982 : 682 Ocala Lane, was originally streets were :y lines . This �r and Mr , .la Lane extends , the applicants y showing the Mr . Baskf ield he agenda. ses that had MISCELLANEOUS The Commission received a Handout memo from t e Code Enforcemen Officer relative to a proposed garage constru tion at 538 W. Annapolis, for a Mrs. Theresa Meidlinger, Pu lic Works Director Danielson and Planning Consultant Da lgren explained the situation to the members. After discussion, Burke moved, seconded by B proceeding without a public hearing if the g on the same location as the old garage which Voting: all ayes. sener, to recommen age is to be as torn down. HAZARDOUS Commission member Stefani reflected on the li t presented to INTERSECTIONS the members by Mr. Baskfield earlier in�the e ening and wondered if any policing was being done�on th se intersections being obstructed by plantings/fencing, etc, e felt it was a serious problem and should be looked into. Member Blesener wondered if something could e mentioned in the City Newsletter, addressed to the homeown rs to clean up problem areas where traffic visibility is red ced at certain intersections. It was pointed out that the i tersection of Apache and Decorah is very hazardous! After further discussion, Stefani moved, seco� reco�nend that the City Council direct staff siting a priority item and to take appropriat site violations present hazards. Voting: al ided by Burke, to :o make intersecti >. action, where ayes. The southwest corner of Wachtler and Marie an� also Somerset and Staples intersection were two problem areas t at were mentioned. AIRPORT NOISE Chairperson Kruse advised the members that he had attended the July ZOth City Council meeting relative t Airport Noise and proposed uses for land south of TH 110, e noted that land use was very restricted in this area and that the members should keep advised of any new developments o this matter. CABLE TV �l Chairperson Kruse also noted that he had rece ved a letter from the Northern Dakota County Cable Communi ations Commission (NDC4), asking if there would be any desire f r service for the Planning Commission from a Cable Company. He noted that cable presentations would be presented at the August 4 and Planning Commission MinuCes Page Six July 27, I9$2 '' August 1$ Cauncil meetings. No action was taicen. SWTMMZNG POOL Mrs. Richard Gehrz, 1047 Marie Aver�ue, had been seated in the EMERGENCY audience since the start of the meeta.ng. She attended the (VARIANCE) meeting in the hope of receiving help fram the Commissi.on � members regarding a swimming pooZ that was just under • construction at her home. She noted that when the Code � Enforcement 0£ficer made his inspection, he nated that the excavating was six feet too close to the rear property line , and he pl.aced a"Stap Work" order an the cantractor, thus allowing no further work ta be dane before a variance cauld be applisd for and eonsidered. Duri.ng the course af the � afternoon (July 27, the date the inspecti.an was made and work '� was stapped), a partion of the retaining wall collapsed. She admitted that the pool was not p].aced in �he correct place in the yard and should have been correc�ly place� accordir ta the site p2.an that was being follawed. However she believed that heavy equipment on Marie Avenue had caused vibrations which was causi.ng the sand ta shift and sift around and may have alsa played a part in �he retaining wall callapsing. ' Before the wall collapaed, she had called the City offices �o set up an appointment with Planner Dahlgren to app�.y for a variance, but with the emergency nature of the situatian, she � hoped to get help from the Planning Commission members withaut � having to wait to be an the August 24th agenda. ` It was noted that her neighbors ta the rear, living an Overlaak� could not see a.nto the Gehrz backyard, and the Gehrz's could not see into the Applebaum yard due ta an apgroximately 25 faa� high hill which was between the two �.ots. After further discussian Blesener moved, seconded by Burke, to recommend approval of a si.x foot rearyard vari.ance to a11ow continued canstruc�ian of a swimming paol. This action was taken due to the emergency nature of the matter and was based an the si�e pl.an sho«in� the nature of the problem. Voting: all ayes. ADJOURN There being no further business to came before the Comnnission, Stefani moved that the meeting be adjourned. Burke seconded the mation. Voting: all ayes. TZME QF ADJOI;�RNMENT: 1Z:45 a'ciock P.M. �� 't NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION � c/o City Offices u 750 South Plaza Drive -�r Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 I. II. NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FULL COMMISSION MEETING MINU�ES - July 21, 1982 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Dave Zemke, Cha�rman. The following Directors were present: Baird - Sunfish Lake Boelter - Mendota Bruestle - Mendota Hanson - W. St. Paul Harrison - Sunfish Lake Henderson - Inver Grove Heights Kinney - Lanegran - Tatone - Walker - 7emke - Excused - absent South St. aul South St, aul Inver Grov Heights W. St. Pau Mendota Losleben - Mendota Heights Also present were Gary Matz, Legal Consultant, Ralph Campbell, DC4 Cable Consultant, Jane Bremer, Storer Cable Communications, Dick Joyc , Tribune Cable Company, Ron Abrams and Nelsene Karns of Group W Cable, D b Schultz, Crawford and Anderson, Father John Pilagznski, St. Thomas Acade y, Robert Zeller, Minnesota Cable Communications Board and Grandpa 3'ohn H rrison, citizen of Sunfish Lake. A Motion by Paul Tatone to accept the Agenda after correcting t e spelling of Storer Cable Communication in paragraph V. Seconded by Gran a Alice Harrison. Motion carried. A Motion by Virginia Lanegran to accept the Minutes of the Julyl7, 1982 Commission Meeting. IV. Received a letter from Cooper and Associates stating that they to become our Technical Consultant if we require one. Received a letter from Lilydale that they have approved the NDC for the balance of 1982. As of tonight, Lilydale,Npndota Heights and Sunfish Lake have the 1982 budget. South St. Paul, I9est St. Paul, Mendota and Inv Heights have not presented this to their City Council yet. A Motion by Alice Harrison to accept and file the communication Commission. Seconded by Ken Henderson. Motion carried. V. Presentations by both Tribune Company Cable of Minnesota and S Communications was appreciated by the Commission members. VI. Ralph Campbell gave a review of the Systems Committee meeting o 1982. The Minutes of this meeting were sent out with this week' Paul Tatone added a friendly Amendment to the Minutes of the Sy Committee. To the Channel Capacity Paragraph " State a desire Cable." Seconded by Virginia Lanegran. Motion carried. - �uld like budget �proved Grove to the er Cable July 14, agenda. ems r a Shadow NDC4 - July 21, 1982 Minutes Page 2 VII. A Motion by Paul Tatone that we make a consciencious policy decision to have no Lobbyist Policy. 5econded by Bob Bruestle. Motion carried. Lee Walker, Bob Bruestle, Ken Hanson, Virginia Lanegran, Paul Tatone, A1 Boelter voted for this Motion. � Voted against this Motion: Duncan Baird, Craig Kinney, Ken Henderson, Alice Harrison, Dave Zemke. VIII. Other Business: Motion by Virginia free of charge upon This came about due Lanegran that the Press receive an Agenda and Minutes request. Seconded by Duncan Baird. Motion carried. to a request from Beth Gauper of the St. Paul Dispatch. Due to a recent Supreme Court decision Dave Zemke told of the change the Minnesota State Cable Board is contemplatingin regards to compensation for Multi-Unit owners. The commission decide that we are against continuing compensation. A Motion by Ken Henderson that we extend the full Commission Meeting beyond 10:30 P.M. Seconded by Virginia Lanegran. Motion carried. A Motion by Virginia Lanegran that a property owner should only be compensated by payment of a single reasonable fee for any taking involved in the installation of a Cable Communication System. Seconded by Duncan Baird. Motion carried. This Motion is the committee response to proposed Minnesota Cable Board Rule 4 MCAR S 4.242. A Motion by Virginia Lanegran that Section D from proposed 4 MCAR S 4.242 prohibitions be deleated. Seconded by Alice Harrison. Motion carried. A letter will be drafted by Dave Zemke and Adrian Herbst's office which will be sent to the Minnesota State Cable Board giving the NDC4 position. IX. Report of Officers: Treasury Balance-- $3458.31. No bills to be presented. A Motion by Duncan Baird to approve the }reasure report. Seconded by Bob Bruestle. Motion carried. X. XI. No comments by interested persons. Motion to adjourn by Paul Tatone. Seconded by Lee Walker. Motion carried. � 7 � NUI11HtIlN UAKUTA CUUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION c/o Ci1y Offices � �750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 XI. NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FULL COMMISSION MEETING � AUGUST 4, 1982 � 7•00 P.M. � AGENDA � � Roll Call . Agenda and Amendments thereto approved by a majority of those present and voting. Approval of the Minutes of the July 21, 1982 meeting. Recital regarding communications to the Board. Cable Company presentation: 1. United Zylstra 2. Group �4 Review of System Committee Meeting. Review of System ownership, RFP and Franchise Committee Meetin Other Business. Report of Officers. Presentations by interested members of the public at the meeti wishing to be heard on matters not included on the Agenda. Adjournment. � NOTE: DUE TO THE CABLE COMPANY PRESENTATIONS THIS MEETING STARTS AT 7:00 P.M. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEP�O T0: City Council FROM: Edward F. Kishel City Engineer SUBJECT: 1982 Seal Coating August 3, 1982 Attached Bid Tabulation is the result of bids opened on Augusjt 2, 1982. Low bid will conform to the budgeted amount for seal coat. We recommend award to Bituminous Roadways, Inc., who have bee� suc- cessful low bidders for the past several years. � PROJECT: 1482 Seal Caatinq LOCP.TTOPd: Mendota H2�9hts I��PP.OVE�"ENT td0. None Job No. 8211 BITUthINOIlS COPITRAC70R �ta.,v. BdACKTOP SERVICE COMPANY Burnsvill� Minnesota ALLIED BLAGKTOP COMPANY BID TABt7l.ATION :� : � $�33,759. 00� ENGINEE�R'S ESTIPIATE � 32,511.50 Shc.�r. 1 r,f 1 BIO D�,TE: August 2, 1982 TIP9E: �10:Q0 A.M. REC�1(:DED BY • �FK COf�� . DATE 9J1/82 4 • C�ise No. �> --/() a CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION QF � PLANNING REQUEST Applicant �/ � Name : t(S jC ��' � �' P W� Last First Address: � � � /_/�Ct� �'C{ � o�G Number & Street City Telephone Number: �� "' �� d % Owner Name: Date of �pplic�atia j'��{�� Fee Paid ,3-S -�v-�L �r[. os Initial �� , „� W State � � Last First Inztial Adc3ress: Number & Street City Street Locatian of Progerty in Question: � �7 %�E'cora h � a � Legal Descripti.on of Property: : l o� d� � �t./P / 4�c.l ti r-� �f" � S 5 rf � Type of RequesC: State �"j� a Z ip Z ip �G Rezoning �,/ Variance "�'� �Z� � Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D � rtinor Conditianal Use Permit �� -� Q- � Subdivision AUproval ' � Plan Approval Wetlands Permit Other � Applicable Czty Ordinance Number 1��i Section C�j� �,g�2�'3` ��' „qc d'�� Present Zoning of Property: � ( Present Use of Property:___� ( Pro�aosed Zoning o� Proper�y: (� � Praposed Use of Property: �� • Number of people intettded to live or work on premises: '� I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional materia], are true. �/" �/ � o�.. Dace Received by (title) NOTE: The follawing pZans shall be drawn and atCached to Chis appl.icatian: A. Applications i.nvolving a Variance sYtall submit the following plans. Date Received Initial. 1. Site Development Plan 2. Dimensian Plan 3. Landscape Plan 4. Grading P1an B. Applications involving a Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit ar Subdivision shall submit the £ollowing. I. Sketch Plan 2. Abstractors Certifa.cate (If �he subdivisian involves cuCting of existing parcel inCo two or more lots). /4 July 28, 1982 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTZCE OF HEARING FOR MINQR CONDITI4NAL USE PERMIT TO WHOM IT MAY CdNCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City oi Men ota Heights will meet at �� o'clock P.M, on Tuesday, Augnst 3, 19$2, in the City Hall Council Chambers at 75Q South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, riinnesota, to cansider an application from Brent Baskf ield, for a minor conditio al use permit to instaZl a five foot high wrought iron fence on his property located at 6$7 Decorah Lane. More particularly this land is described as being Lot 5, Slock 4, Delaware Crossing, � � This notice is pursuant to City of Menda�a He2ghts Odinance N0, 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference �o the proposed min r cond�itianal use permit wi31 be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swansan City Clerk ��i�! 1 � a�$2 June 11, 19$2 � TO: M�ndota Heights Planning Commission FROM: Brent Baskfa.eld - 687 becorah Lane SUBJECT: Impractical application af the code causing difficulty and hardship Per the request of the city planner attached, please find an architects'rendering of aur homesite with propased improvements, Obiective: To fence a swimming poal area and secure .+._�.�.�`... our backyard area from dogs, neighbor children and vandals wha.le salvaging a u�able portian of same for family use. Practical difficulties demonstrating need for a fenced in yard. 1. The dwellin behind our ham� is in direct violation of the Mendota Heict ts cades. The house was i.11egally placed approximately 2 feet from the property Iine and the gutterless eves of the dwelling hang over the Io� I.ine by at least 8" spilling run off into aur 35' back yard. In addition since the dw�2ling is so close ta the lot line the occupants {2 adults, 2 children and 1 dog} walk out the back door and on to our yard and without malicious intent tramnle newly_planted trees, shrubs and flawers. t! 2. �e plan to �.nstall a sw�,mmina__nooL__ Since th� back yard is ony 35' deep and since there are heavy underground uti2iti�s buried dawn the center of that 35' back yard and since the center � of that 35' back yard is a drainage swale for the neighboring 4 homes caus�ing panding in our , back yard and since the homes are too close together ta provide any privacy for �he pool area, the pool must be located closer to the street as shown on the architect rendering. � , � 3, Securit is also a ractical reason for �nsta Iing this fence. Since we resided at 687 Decarah Lane {August I, 198i) w�e have experienced a substancial axnount of malzciaus vandalzsm. The fence as propased by the architect would discourage cri�rtinal access ta the back o� caur hame while salvaging some back yard in which our children cauld play without risk yet maintain the quality of the neighbor- hood thraugh this see through iron fence. 4, By Mendota Heights code all swimming pools must ence ar sa e v. e propose ence is similar gua�ity to the fence used to enclose the other pool in Delaware Crassing. 5. With Friendly Hills park across the �treet many p�ople believe it legal to let theiar dogs run freely. This presents a substancial health %azard when doqs free3.y roam our children's play area in the back and the side of our hame. The proposed fence would reduce this risk and eliminate the hardsh.ip currently endured. 6. Hardship calls far fence varience. Because of the il eaa p acement o t e ne�.g boring dwe11- ing and because of the small size af the back vard,and its Iack of privacy it is necessary to utilize a ortion of the szde ard for tlie pool and play area. T zs cou easz y be done without obstructing site of traffic and without negatively impacting the neighborhood by instal- ling this attractive see through ornamental iron fence. Hence the need �or th� varience. l�� - y�"y� - �,�� a CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ��r�a T0: Planning Cammissian FROM: James E. Danielsan Public Works Director and Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer July 22, 1982 SUBJECT: Variance and Minor Conditional Use Permit Brent Baskfield has made application for a variance and a Mi ditional Use Permit requesting to be allowed to install a wrought to enclose partians af hisfyard area ��or reasons calied aut �n hi memo of June 11, 1982. �or Gon- iron fence We fee1 that unrestricted visibility at street intersections is the primary inteni af the fence ordinance and if the applicat�t uses t e wrought iron fence design presented, visibility at this intersection will not be restricted. 8ecause of the open design af this fence staff recom ends granting the variance and minor conditional use permit. , , This granting shauld be conditioned upan campliance with Sec ian 4.7 of the Zoning Ordinance dealing with plantings and shrubs hei ht limita- tions. i. The variance requested deals with Sectian 4.8{2}c which tates, should the rear lot line be common with the side lot line of an a utting 1ot, the portion of the rear lot line equa1 to the required front yard setback af �he abutting iot sha11 nat be fenced to a height or mo e than 30 inches. The app1icant is requesting the fence in this locatio to be 5 feet high. 2. The �ninor conditional use �ermit reqtaested is in S�C'�'tOCI 4.8{2}a which says fences in excess of 30 inches in height extending acro s front yards or along that portion of the side 1ot line equal to the req ired front yard setback shail require a conditional use permit, The fence h ights proposed by the applicant wi11 again be 5 feet high. NOTE: See the plat af survey af adjoining lot on back side of ti . .. - � .�l_ .�.r � S � _ O � r � � i � �� , � � ! / %�D��' . � L O.�'7 cr'I' O f /' o �1' jl,r', :'/�i Scq�� I "= Zo' , ...` i� �.� ..�,s-� /�.,> ��, � �/.�� p` � � � r .\ �ii�?:��?,'� c�:rS�'�� d�. .� ,n �� . \ � , t ' \ � J� � � �_ - � � , � .� `� � � ;' �'\ . .� � _ � c � T, � �� c.l I `C' � <' �' `' o- � r, \ �� ;� A1 - \`��' � � �c � /�/ �� _`� s �' � � - �\ � �' z :� �.�: , , � ti� � � C�� ; , . ,�. - <<, .� � �,�s a � p � ._.. . + � \ . �--' �• � 6^ �. � �_� � , �, _. . � {i`'' �jv �.cs- ��'`�:� -^".i '' c , \\ �� ,p � � •: .'' ` `> \, \ � �� \ �'_ 4 i \ 1 \�C� � • ' \ ` • � n / \ � � � .r • �� . � ��.: � � UJ��'�c�i�`r ••T9 , ' ::� a ,y , -.. , . sz , . , , ,:�� r "`�c, '— - � � � i:rir:�G }.. , n�?1� % .r 7 i� � ' ,�< 1� -� �. � � \ ` r. � C�y �t �7. /'i:'� , ` : �. :�; � i 9 r �� v /� � `. =,�i'.` I _ . , �lB,._.._5�.:� % O L� / �� .� � ...._� ^ � .�. — . \•` � �L _ � � � - -- , - �� I / . -�._, I Ck �_ wf �_� � � o t _ � � ; �� G I .F� ._ � I �..K�IE�D ' 1zE510ElJGE � 27 July 1982 PLANNING REPORT CASE NUMBER• APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: • PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 82-10 Brent Baskfield Northwest Corner of Decorah Ocala Lane ie and Variance to Fence Height on Re r Lot Line Special Use Permit for Fence H ight on Side Yard (Contiguous to Str et) 1. Mr. Baskfield has purchased this residence recently from Minneso who have taken over the residential properties developed by Augu Construction Company in the Delaware Crossings project. He prop construct a wrought iron fence, five feet in height, with one-ha square iron pickets placed six inches on center. The detail of fence is illustrated on the site plan submitted by Mr. Baskfield each of you has a copy, The rear yard of this property is conti a Federal t ses to f-inch his of which uous to the side lot of the residential property to the north. Under th se conditions, Section 4.8(2)c, the Ordinance states that a fence a ong this rear line may be only 30 inches high on that part of the fence 1'ne within thirty feet of the public right-of-way ( Ocala Lane), H intends to build the fence five feet high along this rear property line nd extend it southerly along the public right-of-way (east property line) o a point in line with the front of his house.(fronting on Decorah Lane). The fence would •then extend from this point westerly to the southeast corn r of his house. This proposed fence location is indicated on the site pl n. 2. Section 4.8 (2)a, requires that any fence within thirty feet of side street may be a maximum of 30 inches high. Relief from this req irement requires a Special Use Permit. 3. Attached is a letter from Mr. Baskfield dated 11 June 1982 addr ssed to the Mendota Heights Planning Commission indicating the reasons f r his request. Obviously, Mr. Baskfield is concerned with the close proximity o that was misplaced in construction that is contiguous to his rea trespassing, and possible damage to his property, and the locati future swimming pool. The problems of tr�spassing may have been influenced by the fact that Mr. Baskfield, as you may have heard news accounts, is the spokesman for. Northwest Airlines. He indi during the recent strike he has had a greater than usual problem malicious damage, That risk, of course, may well not be permane least due to those circumstances. ' �- = the home ' lot line, �n for a somewhat in recent ;ates that ; with 1t, at -. CASE NUMBER: 82-10 APPLICANT: Brent Baskfield � Page. 2 4. The existance of the nearness of the contiguous home, plus the utilities and drainage arrangements in his rear yard, obviously create some unusual conditions, particularly with respect to the location of a swimming pool. The Public Works Director will comment regarding these engineering considerations. 5. Part of the problem with respect to the replacement of the pool is that the Ordinance requires that a pool to be constructed at least ten feet from the house. This is to prevent possible drainage problems with respect to pool leakage, and is a restriction normally adhered to. 6. One of the reasons for requiring the lower fence height on a corner lot is so as to maintain traffic visibility at the intersection. Section 4.7 of the Ordinance deails with traffic visibility and requires that no structure or planting exceed 36 inches high that would adversely affect such visibility on the corner. This distance is normally construed to be a triangle drawn at a 45 degree angle to the streets at a point 30 feet perpendicular distance from either street. Thus, if a structure is placed 30 feet from each street, such a triangle will not be infringed upon by the structure. Such a triangle drawn on this site would appear to require that the fence along Pontiac Place be moved approximately 18 feet to the north. This would have the effect of moving the pool 18 feet north which would appear to be possible without conflicting with the drainage or easements in the rear yard. We feel that this is an important consideration inasmuch as it deals directly with the public safety. Though the applicant proposes to build a fence that can be seen through, if the pool is placed only four feet from the side property line, it is likely that such a fence will ultimately be screened to provide privacy either with shrubbery or other material. 7. Mr. Baskfield proposes a�ive foot high fence because it is the minimum requirement required for enclosing a pool in a yard. Another adjustment that might be considered is that of reducing the height of the fence at the northeast corner of the property, but enclosing the pool at a point further south with the required five foot fence. You will notice that in Mr. Baskfield's drawing, that there is such a fence running east and west from the northeast corner of his house. The fence may be built five feet high in all locations exc�pt 30 feet from Pontiac Street. Thus, if a lower fence is proposed within that 30 feet (for which the variance is being requested) this would alleviate the condition of a high fence next to the front yard on the property to the narth. 8. It would appear t.hat the case for locating a pool on the property has merit in being partially in the side yard inasmuch as the rear yard is encumbered with engineering concerns. It would appear from the.drawing, however, that the pool could be moved further to the north, thereby occupying less of the side yard contiguous to the house, and providing for the traffic visiblity, which is one of the principal reasons f.or the reduced fence height in the 30 foot area contiguous to the street right- of-way. � CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: 82-10 Brent Baskfield 9. Our Engineering Department has checked out the nature of the uti: that run through the back yard and report that it is an undergrot electrical service and underground telephon service. Unless ser� Baskfield residence only, these utilities should�have been placec easement along the north property line. The drainage swale, Mr. Danielson reports, does exist running through the back yard, whe� too should have been constructed within the drainage easement alc north property line. It would, however, be difficult to change t drainage condition at this time inasmuch as drainage from the cor property to the east also runs through this swale. Thus, regrad� at least two lots would be necessary to reroute the drainage alor north property line. This is also complicated by the fact that t residence on the contiguous lot to the north was misplaced, and i to the rear lot line of Mr. Bask.field's lot than allowed by Ordir (10 feet) . 10. We have met with the Minnesota Federal people who have indicated intent to apply for a variance with respect to this reduced side setback. 11. ►\ In summary, it would appear that D'Ir. Baskfield has a case due to physical conditions of the land. It would appear reasonable in c opinion, however, to consider moving the proposed fence and pool north along the side of the house. In other words, a portion oi rear yard could be used for the pool site, allowing for the mover the pool away from the front yard setback a distance of ten to 1! The variance, if approved, should be with the condition that no : or solid fence shall impede the required corner lot sight lines. happen in the future anyway because of the need for privacy of tt Flaced so close to the public street, the movement of the pool ai further north would mitigate the im�act of such a future visual c� e 3 ities nd ing the in the eas it ng the his tinguous ng of g the he s closer ance their yard the ur further f the I1ent of i feet. �hrubbery This may iis pool id fence �bstruction. HD 1 (� �] \ (� .r t 4 `��` e�; � �p � � . ' N r � a � + � ♦ -r j ."' , �� *1� � .'� , i ,Jy �.J�' � � � �" � 1 d ��*�; `s � `A N ' Ar� �^ ' 'f, ; � ,� 2 �)s. !OS v z 4 . ♦ � '� , � , � .,.r, �a � . , ; E. 1� Y�} �'� l. V �` � l__� 'y+ Z n t • o � � I" n A K `o S ,f.r l�,y .!' z, ' � _, "'\ v �{ ts o �L h '' o 'N � LC` '°`'` '°Z .c � . � H�:.�'F NN.�.-•-�"'--- `...... ~ V 17 k a>QJ� 'f' y. `"� t `_,_ '-"'--' , '�'"� 0 00� o i j T 0 ' ' roa� i> )� � (E � 3 k'n�� !?o,ro � ; t ? Q � 0. ^ * � t � / ` �' µ � 4 ° s' ' \ Z � � � tS ; e � . -� ----- • • � n. � , t �'0 7 �, '• 4, � 20 { �Js p� ' � � a,r'� 1 Z � � � ♦ 1 � � [. M 7 ; ��*� t ��= Za �i a , � . c ,� , w �t r � �e L , \ P .., 9 . .s ti � ,` • P e �PL. °'` s� 'r �� ` 4 �' �` / i3' % Q, rib -� ��` � w¢'� b ''s s �'�' ° r �s ` r� � '9 � 'i {,� � + � �, , t O d. � l, gs 3 � ',.,�, d" � � 3 c, sy Z y j� ,s l3 � a �, � . a o� j G� � o�' ,o / � ," i�: � u t4 ' i. , .' � PO �'� O '4r > Ce y �'.i .. ,o�s � ii � ��''9 �,�� ' +� '�'�� pt� �� `�� tS �4 , o» Y ��1� Jf' :dDS '� br'�e 3' o � C�P �i` 1G �.. 1 ' � 6 it � ro f1 ��V J' � � � � • S v � � /.i � i i) �l� (. 9 S' t � � / t ' e � I C icl� � r� „� � tio �r i �rw . � o .,}, 1 � � � wJ 'r t I 'oo ! y -�,�j , � •t � � �y � e � s � � � rl'Z � � ' , � � sl ' �� i7Y ,:� �4 0 . � �? y < �r ; � Ug ,,P �; � ,. � � , � a ,ti G� 9J �, ,t5 �� , y? � � rn • � . f�1 ', p z y, , y I�l �`� � `y� Q n e� �} 9 �:* � �at ,t �""! 6 f\ ic s „�4 �RC � '�� 1.tI, A�� *V �� i \ ; ♦ � � � 7 r' �\ t i n �� .�• � S i C <r., '� ` 7 n 4 �,� �� 0 40 �--� � Z r� r� "= r c _ s �`'� / , f� � �Y f�`f � I 2t , N s. e � � � � �% 4,' 4� G ?, ��* 77 • � a y `�t` '?' ° : s � ��j , � +�r f ' � r i' P' <o. s'•r e� � � ! A � 1 �' i � 'o� c � �, 8 `}� .l� o 9 7 � �' '• "��,L_ I �,% ��, s' � o`' �•� 7 i:`\.. y � u � ►, �*'�-_ / .sr ,' ,� I , q f .9 � j' i ; --......�. / •� ��, � �: '� ,. L ` . "'Y 4 � , � 7 , , �,� `- a� ._ 1` 79' �„ � r n � ' .\ ,� y s �.. +„ � t� �`\ r L `� O � ��,, o� , t5 s ,... ��' �� j� �� r,�`� CASE NO. 82B akfield '�'�� ; ' y + �' / 9t pPPLICANT- VarianGeUse Per �' . r J ,' ij r z ., p,CTION: SpeGi,al 'b ! ] f l \ .,�,a�� o T 'r t �`-+',C� � 'g � ' ' /''�"" � !S �r .Y/� �� ti� � � tA � � S wt ,�/� � ry o 9„ �G yr � , s �� . 4 , � ? r+ N : c v„ y r .� 7 rta � � � r. ; A '�� 7 S ,� �� '� S � p> O : Z " t 7 7 4- / ' .' �.. _....-----'_. a �S '�Y a �' . � r . ..... 'Y � ^O � %Q � � 7 � V /�., � t ,1 .t` Y�F � ,4 n i.. . � � J �. . `..Y.. / \'' . '' �'�NN�r'� Minnesota � � Department of Tra�zsportation -f �� yQ°� D485c�-i dley Avenue North, Box 2050 �°��°'`� North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 July 22, 1982 City of Mendota Heights . , Attention - Mr. Paul Berg j 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 ; Dear I"� . Berg : � We request to be included in the agenda of the council meetin� 'Il.iesday, August 3, 1982. � . We intend to request council approval of the building permit for the Maintenance Facility at 2229 Pilot Knob Road. ' Sincerely, ' (it/ � 7"� Wayne F. Mzrph District l�iritenance �gineer Nh1/DOT - District Nine An Equal Opportunity Employer f� f, (612) 770•2311 A � � City of Mendota Heights � F: � - M�ma t July 28, I9$2 ,,,� . . ...f T0: Cit�r CounciZ FROM: Paul R. Berg SUBJECT: Mn/Dat-Building Permit A letter has been received from Wayne Murphy, District Maintenance Engineer Mn/Dot distxict �%9. Wayne is requesting to be scheduled on the August 3, 1982 councii agenda ta request appraval of a building permit for the maintenance facility at 2229 Pilot Knob road, (note: the street number is temporary until such times as the remainder of the M.A.C. property is platted}, MnlDot was before Gauncil on March 2, 1982��or approval of a wetland permit,. foundatian permit, site plan review, and landscaping plari review. S�aff had prepared a memo to council addresszng specific requirements some of which I have prepared a memo to council addressin;g specif ic requirements some of which I have listed above, In addition the planning commission expressed concern :: directed towards a requirement for dense plantings as a screen along the South boundary adjacent to the equipment storage lot. pther poin�.s were brought out cancerning the area are as fallows: a. The Mn%Dot site abuts a residential zane. A f ence not Iess than 54;per-cent opaque and not less than 6 feet in height be cons�ructed along the common lo� line. There is a fence designated on the''�Nofth property line, hawever, ather than the Iocation details af the praposed fence have not been submitted. b. Public sewer and water are not avaai.lable for thzs building site at this time. Mn/Dot has petitioned the city for tho�e facilities last f all, but because the building is nat schedul.ed for co�zt�letian or occupancy befor� 1982 plans far ' their installatian were delayed. M.A.C. intends ta sell the remaining land to a developer. staff feels that delaying an improvemant project unta.l after tl�at sale may be prudent, however, Mn/Dot and Council should be aware that before a certif icate of occupaney could be issued to MnjDot the required sani.tation facilities need to be instalZed and functional. c. The buildings access raad follaws �he proposed alignment far a future city street and it is felt that the right of way should be dedicated to Che city at this time. I have reviewed the plans and specs and f ind them to substan�ially comply with Iocal codes and ordinances and would recammend that Cauncil grant the building permit subject to con.tractor licen.sing and carnplience with staff recommertdatzons listed herein. * See back side for Wayne Murphy's letter of request. ; €1 � CITX 4F MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTX, MINN�SOTA APPLICATION FOZ2 CONSIDERATION OF . PLANNING REQUEST L G > h.r..ri Cc1S2 NO. ��,'� r7 � Date of Applicatior ��h� b, ��t � Z-- � Fee Paid�/d�,(7 -- (�/�p,{,[E�(,/`R� Apglicant Name : $ �- � �.-/�-� � P /�-~ % /Z ( C k" �." Last First Initial Address: 7SD .Sousry i°(��y dv. µ 3'{6 M�c.�tr�ot4+ �F,�.r �t��7. st 2-� Number & Street City State Zip Te2ephone Number: ¢' S Z- S 8�S , Owner • . Name: R f Ll��-/ a SY'/z y�!/E2 Last First • In�.tial Address: 7SO Sm u� /�!a La D:�. N�.��.�,�� FFf� M ti � S.r � Z Q Number & Street City State 7ip ,Street Lacation of Property in Question: ; � Legal Descriptian af Progerty: Type of RequesC: Re zon. ing �/ A �- Variance ��Z�'�4c'GL� ��J�7.� Conditional Use F�rmit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Minor Conditional iJse Permit Subdivisic�n Approval Plan Ap�raval ' Wetlands Permit �__. Qther � � . :, � , � � ;: 4 . � G Applicable City Ordinance Number �t' o I Section �d', S �� ' Present Zoning of Property: 'J — � Present Use of Property: /� _� � Proposed Zoning of Property: '� �' , , Proposed Use of Property: ! ; ' Number of people intended to live or work on premises: '- ' ; ,, I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. / � �G�� Signature of Applicant G��ti � (S�Z. , � Date Received by (title) NOT�: �The following plans shall be drawn and attached to this application: A. Applications involving a Variance shall submit the following plans: Date Received Initial 1. Site Development Plan 2. Dimension Plan . 3. Landscape Plan � 4. Grading Plan y ' B. Applications involving a Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit or Subdivi.sion �• shall submit the foJ.lowing: 1. Sketch Plan ' 2. Abstractors Certif.icate (If the subdivision involves cutting of existin� parcel into two or more lots). � July 6, 1982 Mendota Hei�hts City Council Mendota Keights City Planning Commission This is an amendment to the si�n variance request th; I filed last month. After attending both the Planni: Commission and City Council meetings, I feel the sug gested alternative to my original proposal is a good workable idea. I have included a description and sk� of the proposed sign with this letter. I feel the s is in keeping with the professional image of the bui ing. P�Zr. Richard Stryker, the building owner, suppo; this effort and feels it is a much better idea than adding additional signs to the buildin� itself., � tch � d- ts I would again like to say that I feel this sign is v ey important to the success of my new dental practice h re in mendota Heights. A sign may not be that importan to an established dental practice, but every dental business seminar I have attended stressed that it is essential for a new, developing dental practice -to h ve good visibility. Sincerely yours, , � ' � r� ; ci,� �� cc,f',� �°t ��. �. / 1n � Patrick T. Ballard, D.D.S. Incl. 0 � S��fl `-�. . �i,Z$��, `�. `�. � .}rect o1.. .,�3karrJe, �.U.4l.1.� 756 50UTH PLAZA DRtVE MEtVDOTR HElGNTS. MlNNESOTA SSt2d TEi.EPHONE 452-581 $ c� t�.71t' ��j � � �� T�� endota �Iei�ht� City Counca.l I�•ienci.a�ta �-I�i�;hts C;i�t;y I'lanning Commission 750 �oizth l'laza 1)ri.v�: p.2enda�a �I�i�h�t;s �iinnesata 55120 At the request af �r. I'atricic .r�all�.rd, I have con�acted. a1.1. of �he oth�r tenan�;� in th� D�.lcota County 33�.nk J3uilda.n�. !�t -�his tim�, n.o one el�� has any inter�a u in a sign. outside the bui.ldin�;. Ilo�,��ever, fu�#:ure tenants might very u�ell desire �his kind of visi�k�ility d.ependin� on �Gheir type of business. Therefore, I thank it is a good idea that the proposedtsign be �I�xible enou�;}i to allow :ior �;his. :-�incerely, � ��.� /�1�-_. _.. �-.--�. �( Itichard 5tr ker��l � Y D. C. iZ. Camp�,ny ftichard �tr,yk�r I�•:an�.�i.n� I'ar��ner � ' INFORMATION ON PROPOSED SIGPi FOR DR. BALI,A�tll'S D; OFFICE AND OTHER INTERESTED TENANTS AT 750 SOUTH DRIVE, 1MlENDOTA Y,EIGHTS - two 4M x�" redwood posts set in concrete 6�9n apart - four 3/4" Duraply panels set in alwninum retainer between posts - panels will be removable, interchangeable, and double-sided - panels will be black with silver letters - panels shall be 6'9" long and about g" high - use of sign will be ma.de available to other tenants on a first come basis by splitting the cost evenly with Dr. Ballaxd - sign shall be placed 6• south of property line and 33� east of driveway (See drawing. Scale: 1" s 18.7') ;� �A � � -' l �� . ' �! `1, ; � `�: . i , F\fi-_ , � ' : .. 1 ,�_YS ,k..•} i t 1 ' l � �� -� .. � f �� h�r., '! 1 '�� __ _�_ . . _ . - - _ . .._.:.� - - - - -- - - � -- --{-- . P.; �,J,/ G `�NG .�i'�� t•-1 � � $ L'�R6 �V �.c►��v� =XU c�� c ��uN `�/ �/ - -�-- - -- ---- �- - - -------- - ---- -t- - �- - . . -- •1FQIF''( Ex�_ �. ..sT2. `�E�lvi Gdn�IJ. �,L�) 6�� .St.tLVICc - IT' � (-\f`�Nf!OL� E. SI��UT-OFF •JFiI.� Zt.�J��. L �irEt�Eo 3�l c(�'/ � � • v ,� '_! _•,•\ �. • . `� `, _ , m 'i, . 'r ' ' r`\ \' - -• - . , ,� . • - P ' ` , .. , � . �� -i � � � . i ` jr j _ _ z...»_..�,.- _--\ � / / r � '- - _ ; ✓u: I. 1 t �- i ;__�_—_ �`'^� - .:.� . �...�`- _ _ �_ �� : 1 � . I � _ � ' J � Y .� . _--�_ _�`,`. �� i ; - ----- � --- �`-- i� ; , .' _ � ' �.� ..----- _. ._..__. W _ _ _._- �'�j - - -• --- •---- - - � _ _ - j - _ _ .___ -� � '''� I �� , 3.� ,f' r � — ------------- _ ' r� v ' � . � �C \ r; � � � - I __ - -------• - :.ri --- - ---� �,=�\ \ \\ \, - N, � � � � ^ � --?- _ — s�- � � •�� . ! , • � _\w ' � , 1` ; W �'v' `��-; � a ; � ` �' � - --- , ,��.\ \ � ' ��Y �."c` J�-c .5�-- �- I _.. , • �� .�J � --•- - -- - � � '`�, -,._ __ � ' O � � � 4^.. \.�"'"' N ` � �:.� t:. ! -•s ! ---� � ` . � ; � . , � - �--'--- i. . ._. � y . � ' :--..__;��.�..�_ _ . .. _�........ -•-- -------�-----__,----•K--.. . � ' � / � I `jF!tr�j �tir� 1"1�rJ. y � ( �r�.� � � , i1 • � � � � : I `-o" Lur �( . � f • ». R�Mc�Vc ','�ti�� i �� / I:j � ; ,� 3(T i'�Vl��,tc.� ..% .. } � � ; C.� ^I G G u i� : -� . . L �, , ' /, �` � ' � 1 / �I J � • � ' ., ' . �•�' � _ _ �� i` 1� '--"—--'"'—".1 _.y"- 7 �/ -- �r' + {' � � .. - -__ � I ! ��\�.1 �%h�`. I � � �G�Y�% ��%iS �.�1�-� i;I ' . : -_—_� ' � /�+'A-fi ' .,Yc � I , l . �.. � ' � i r + , g�u � � � I 5� �, -2 r ii � � I � ." r'f[�1lo}��r��Ei.:: +. ,� I / . � • ' 1 i/'M L� �1V ICS ♦ � J I � ��f�fL � '��` - ( �j 1 + j , ' ' �e�-w :�IT � � �� •i � T�"}►t7tt� �F�• R , _ � � ��.� h.a , I ; �'�f--'-�-j + , � � ' ' , �cc '�r � ,� � � �� i ! t . i ' , � , t ;=�Fi s i R i Pf r.tr� � � °,�" � - - � • - - - - - - - - ' - - - T---y-..�...�.. � _ . . . t ; � � , `�y , � � � ' J � ; � I � � , r � i � �'� . ��REMovc=. , I � , . . 1 ' r —_— � �� `� , I �y � ��' • � '� � t � ?AYINIa' . / �NC r:Jnb`" j i. " �. I ;�-� � i � L . ' ; � _ YE�,iF1` v-o ir-o ,� 42D—O. .� , j . � � �I _;� � . _ .._ ...r -- -- - ,� - ,� -- -�- -� - -- - ---------------�— --- ----- --�---�--� - � - - --- - --- -- f - ., � ' � � J � �i ��,�.s �, . , ', , i i i ` � �v � .): / � I � � .._ �-.-�- ` ------•-- •----./: i s . , �.. »��+� ��". -'" '£M,M; ` . �'s _. � ' . 88-c � t , . cx.� ; �, � �:. �-r-- t , � �; � 8sg i'' � Tv � c:. � r EJ-', C:v � � `}' / ; 1 Y n� � :J!�� D , %�;; / N��,;� i �i�ir �^<< J_.t- !� . ,/ . � te�;�`. '�♦ ' . ' . -: ;:.�_: 1; , ' •?i \ /,,%%,'l{f`/ �� i; . �r :�/��i .�i�St � � �=. ., . .--.-• ;',1, `1 r; -• � ^�-'-"' ' 1 { 1 ' � . � , r L."'�'�� t r � � � ' - i:. 27 July 1982 PLANNING REPORT CASE NUMBER: APPLI CANT : �- LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PL1�,NNING CONSIDERATIONS: 82-07 Patrick T. Ballard South of South Plaza Drive ( Financial Center) Heights Approval of Variance to Sign L�cation 1. Dr. Ballard was in last month to discuss a proposal to add a sig indicating the presence of his dental office in the Mendota Heights Financi 1 Center. You will recall that he proposed to add a panel under the existi g sign indicating the location of the Mendota Heights City Hall and the bank. Based upon advice from the Planning Commission, staff, and consu tation with others in the building, Dr. Ballard now proposes to constru t a separate sign easterly o�f the access drive to the general parkin area as shown on the attached plan, t4embers of the staff and Dr. Bal ard inspected the site area, and suggestcd that if a sign of the typ proposed is to $e mounted in the area in question, that the location as n w proposed would be the most appropriate one. 2. �� This places the sign 33 feet east of the driveway, and six (6) f�et from the right-of-way line of South Plaza Drive. Another consideration might well be the length of time that the ign is allowe� to remain. The Commission had discussed the possibility of setting a termination date of from one to two years. Dr. Ballar has expressed his concern regarding the establishment of his practic (it being a new practice), and was willing to consider the possibili y of the removal at some point in the future when the practice is est blished. Dr. Ballard reports that at as of this time, no one else in the uilding desires to have their name on the sign. If that is the case, re oval as some point, say two year.s, might be aF>propriate for. considera ion. � a a HD & � � , ; 11�i �•��'��., � ( ' n�.�. '� �� V 9iO� " j , , Y 0 � _ � Ip� � � � � � � �� ., 3. � �J4p { � « � � ' k �� _-..,. L` .�i�, _ f , t'Jt �r * � � µ; /L - .. _ .. Cd b , . � , _- � , t � 6�0 � � � . 7lHM � ' � t' •�/ . •� � � � r � �'� �� i � t"I ' � y� . � . . . . .. � , � . �� , . f � � _ �j . • �, � . ��}, : � t � : `!t; ,^ . . -.., :,f, ' � ; . .:p ��1 ' f� p �. wri,' I? .... Ii '',J I�t�� - ;; ., .� , � J �OTOl:� ; d ' ; ,. . , h�. ;ii - r �� a . �' �,,�� s ,,, • i; `. .. � . .ii� �� ' o .`: f . . ..t; �i. � •� � i � ' 9SU y� � '" . • � . ` ,'., . �.i O4o� i , ` � . �s �� '. i F" • • . . E �t„ - ' , ' ; !� + . ` _ v.__� . -- " ti• ''� � �� ' , � . . i �� .. _.. . „ . . , • `1 7zo • -- _ ... .- - _ -- - - - 1 . • ��o �.H I G >1 N' � }� � � �. � � *+�,.� - f � r� ~ .t . • • � C `V r: 'r, r � a �� g� �R g , , • 0 � �Q < �� 4f ' '� , �LIBs.1F...C1 PI30P... — � '�.,`�,,�•.. � - , f:lf „ - . • , � � ` : �� . ' � •' `'� � �. t � i{ , �.�...\� ,: '`• � ` � � r'` -' r`�' `I� b3s•a � , �a�� , � : , � ,' � i a��.� - :��.. . •: . , � 1` �5 � ' .... � Qi - .. . . - � � 1 • : . � . ,�.,�� J � � f . . . _ -• .. .'---... '3 t `; � a�, .; ,; ," � � i{ .� 4 �.< �.y k � 1 � ,'t� � i � . ..� f�� • * i..�� t �� f15.� � , , �J • �:• �:.:r • -' ago � � � 1\ /�� - ti0 ' ' .� . . ``f . ' 1 , rt . 4 • �I •$ i �. _u . t � V � � , ' . . Vf'} ,V j'��, . � f1T.0, ~~~ �� i s _ � � f - . .. »_.. _.... _.._ �� 'i✓ \ 9��f fJ ^' . - f f . .. . _ . .. .« _ _ _ ' ' . �'„�:_._,_ W � ��. l�" /� j � � . . 8�0 r . . ' • • ' ^ "� . : fl39 a s'5�,��*�� 1✓ �, � . � � fe . p Y , ^ ^ �. ' ' �'�T.' ' �V � ' ' ,p(� � �3A � �', �� . ` , /. 1�.'` "i ,�• � 417. . , , . � � W , ' .. . ' e r• j ' � � t b �� • � jM"� ' , " £ � e, • .Tt-�T-�' a� 4 ;,�i , - .�,�r , . . ,, ; , /�v,l� .� � .. r -0'sol . . �°o- '4 • • ,ri.'� a�c " - sss a � ' � ,�� , � ,+�'� � ,', i� E9 -, . .. • ty3i : ,� � ' - - - .... �! . �1 � �`� 6°�'.b� CASE NUMBER: $2-07 � - a . 14 APPLICANT: Patriek Ballard � � � ACTIODI : �• M Variance to Sic�n Location ^��M • YtNw y q . �. r+ ' �� (}� � �;j ry �,ip � a . ,:..'/ 1 � +� � t �yiR+ . ��w.r..�' � �.� i� _ � w � 1� � � . bream hor�nes, inc. July 22, 1982 ,\ JULI2 g 1982 Mr. Orville Johnson, City Administrator ��,� i;��=»„��.'•.��,City �of Mendota Heights ,, ,.�; .��:� .,. .. �-�.:.' ' �: '{� ��750 South Plaza Drive ' " �� '� : Mendota Heights, MN 55119 , Attention: Mayor, City Council ' Dear Sir: , Oa behalf of the Eagle Point Development Company, I would like to requeat approval to extend the permit for the temporary sale � facility on our Eagle Ridge property from the expiratioa date of August 1, 1982 to August Z, 1983. � I would like to draw to your attentfon the improved appearance f • the sales facilitq with the addition of lighting, landscaping d . , ' awnings . � Our office has hsd no complaints and I have been informed that o complaints have been received by the City either. � Thank you for qour cooperation in this matter. � «.^'�,'�_,��'�,:.,.�'�+�*;��nca eZY� : ��;�:,.�.:,.. ,:�Y� =,, � �::�, _, . ��-�� +.' ",.'�.�F, eti ��.1 �' .?�L,:i' - �. .. .;i � ' J'i�;� >,; . p " ��.iY-"��,'.S:Zrii i8�' '�i" [:��.iilf..�' ^4. �/^I/^' V' �+.1 �. � � �'', .��iV;� �? �K' . , ! I �' ��I �� , .l�� ,�;�.��' �� `.. ' J'_ ,„- . y eri� :+.:�i.:..V;iv��r";; ,' ' .. .. �. 4�� 4 � h.%� �Y, cy �. �... .��:�•�:� ��: ;��"�`�`'; '"Hoi,iard M. Bream h�.k•� S . tl:-9=� _` =�}''`'"" = Eagle Poiat Development Co. -*.: ",�, . :;�` • � - • � � �� ' HIKB :md ' � , -* 961 Grand Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55105 / Telephone (612) 2� 7 � Case No. CAO r}r.� -D C�TY OF MENBOTA HEIGHTS ' Dakota County, Minnesota " APPLICATIQN FQR CCINSIDERATION of CRITICAL ARL'A DEVELOPM�NT (Ordinance No.'403) Date of A�plication �%-- /`-�,..Z Fee Paid /,�� Receipt Number �'73 � Applicant: rrame : %vo �� e. �ri a c.-h � � %�.� Last First Address: /��,3 O �Q c/ i�e �sa� Number & Stre� City Phone: � .��- /�42 � Owner: Name : �� r37 e.... ' Last First Address: . Number & Street City Street Lacata.an of Pzoperty zn Question: �C � � `�! �"1T,�;'� l� __ Legal Description of Praperty: __ __ - � �-- 5��7 5`4 l - � "�d' � . �ir! �r S r`7! � initial �f �' /� �� State Ini�.ial State �� O Type of Request: Variance - , � Site Plan Appraval Modified 5ite Plan d!'� � D 3 �'e �.,� ,� � �' `5`.� //r�' Zip Cod� Zip, Code CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 23, 1982 T0: City Council FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director and Paul R. Berg , Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Critical Area Ordinance - Single family site plan�revie Thomas Nonnemacher has applied for a Critical Area Ordinance eview for Lot 4 of the Mayfield Heights Addition. The site plan as subm'tted has been reviewed by staff in addition staff has made an on site i spection. The lot slopes to the north and is heavily wooded. The new h me has been designed to fit the existing grades as closely as possible so only two trees need to be removed. Very little of the existing vegetat'on on the home site area will need to be disturbed. Although this proposed ome does fall within the River Corridor Critical Area it doesn't encroach o the 40� bl uff .1 i ne. Staff ca�nnot see where Mr. Nonnemacher would require the issu nce of any variances for his construction, providing that the applicant c mplies with the Cri�ical Area Ordinance section pertaining to proper eros'on control methods. Staff would recommend the issuance of a Critical rea Or- dinance site plan approval�.�under Section 2.3c, Modifications for M'nor Revelopment n Case Na. CITY OF MENDOTA HBIGIiTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINN�S4TA APPLZCATZON FOR CONSIDERIITIQN OF PLANNING REQUES`P r� . • Date of Applicatifl �"��' � � Z Fee Paid .�;3,,�'� �' UP Applicant � Name : C01011 VeY'iloTi R « Last First Initial Address: -994 Winstan Circle Mendota Heights, Mn. 55118 Number & Street City State Zip ,: . � Telephone�Number: 457-623$ Owner � , �tame: � �ederai Land Company ' Last First . Initial Address: 346Q Washin ton Drive Eagan Mn. 55122 Number & Street City State Zip SCreet Locatian o� Property in Question: b30 Sibley Memorial Highway (Nighway 13} + „ Legal Descrigtion of Praperty: ' A11 that part of l.ot 9, in Auditor's Subdivision No. 4, Lilydale, lying South of the Sauth line. h xype of Request: Rezpning � � � r t . x Variance Conditzonal Use Permit X Conditional Use Permit far P.U.D. riinor Conditional Use Permit _ Subdivision Approval ' Flan Approval t�3etlands Permit Other ti� � Section 19 of the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Mendata Heights, Minn sota , Ordinance Na. A�OI} provides for Planned Unit Development utilizing �en 10} or more acres of cantiguous land. The subject parce] is approximately 5,62 acresa A variance rom e a , Use Permit for P.U.D. h i �� 1 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO T0: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director and Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer July 22, 1982 ' SUBJECT: Federal Land Company - P.U.D. Variance Request � Vern Colon has comissioned different architects, engineers and land- ; scape designers to develop a new 16 unit P.l1.D. proposal for his 5.6 acre site on Highway 13. This new plan is not substantially different from the + townhouse plan submitted in 1981. He has now proposed to eliminate the pool and tennis court facilities. � The variance requested deals with a section of the P.U.D. Ordiarice t requiring a minimum of 10 or more acres of contiguous land. When this issue was before you in 1980-81 in was learned from the public � heari�gs that a number of the residents contiguous to the property were opposed to the P.U.D, concept. In 1980 both the Planning Commission and the City � Council unanimously voted to deny the P.U.D. Mr. Colon has not demonstrated to staff that this plan will meet with any greater neighborhood support than ; it has in the past. If this variance is approved tonight�a Public Hearing to consider the P.U.D. should be set for August. If the variance is denied perhaps Mr. Colon ' could be convinced to withdraw his P.U.D. Application. �I �r` C 7` � \ :�y� ��/✓� 4�l��..��..�+.<'�.1��'�� ,�,;;�, • Yankee Square OFFice III • 3460 Ulashington Drive • Suite Q02 • Eagan, Minnesota 551 QQ • Tel.� 61 Q-45Q-3303 July 8, 1982 FEDERAL LAND COMPANY - VERNON R. COLON P.U.D. APPLICATION 1. This project is being designed as a safe, secure, residential environment. It will feature significant, quality homes in a park-like setting. The intended market is of those people, who desire a house wit individual character within a quiet, shared setting. . The proposed units will be grouped in clusters to provide as much park-like open space as possible. These units will be � located at the top of the site and will terrace down towards � the highway. By grouping the units in clusters it is possibl to leave more space open for natural park or landscaping, as well as the proposed putting green and pond. 2. Should project be approved, financing is arranged with America National Bank of St. Paul. 3. All of the land within the Proposed Planned Unit Development i presently owned by Federal Land Company. 4. The expected schedule of development will be to prepare final design drawings and to prepare construction documents within 60 days of final approval by the City of Mendota Heights. In response to more specific information relative to construction scheduling as outlined in Section 19.6 (2) e, the following is Federal Land Company's intentions. The project will be built two (2) stages, with 8 units being constructed per stage. Stag one will commence construction in late fall of 1982, weather permitting. If the necessary permits and the like cannot be obtained by this time, then construction shall commence by the early Spring of 1983. Stage two shall commence construction within 90 days from the commencement date of construction of phase one. The development of this project shall be completed within 9 months from the date of comnencement of construction of phase one. The total 4 acres of open area shall be complet phase one. , 5. The units are set in groupings of 2 residences, giving a total of 16 over the 5.62 acres. Each resident will have its own RECEry�p JU� 1 2 1982 n �d in P.U.D. APPLICATION Page 2 � entry-court, landscaped for privacy and rear deck area. To � accommodate the intended buyers, the homes will be approximately , 2,000 square feet, selling for between $200,000 and $225,000. ; 6. The cluster site plan allows an open park-like space which � ' separates the housing units from each other. The developed � area is 16 units X 2,000 square feet equaling 32,000 square feet. Drives would be equal to or less than the same, leaving approximately 4 acres of green area. 7. The density per unit is expected to be two people per unit or 32 persons total. 8. The attached units, utilizing a common wall, will conserve on energy consumption. 9. A tenant's association will be established and as part of the s duties therewith associated shall be maintenance of the cotnmon , grounds. Through past experience, this has proven to be very successful at preserving a clean and appealing atmosphere. � 10. Based on current data from the Metropolitan Council, the increase in building permits for townhome developments over the last ten • years has risen 70� throughout the Metropolitan area, and over 50q throughout Dakota County. This increase substantiates the � demand for this type of development. The quality construction ' of these units combined with the superior location and the ' internally contro1led landscaping development will make this development one of the finest in the City of P�endota Heights: � � � ; The Honprable Mayor Robert Lockwood and Members of �he City Council Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission City of Mendota Neigh�s 750 S. Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Mn, 5512Q Dear Mayor Lockwoad, �a �� ' fM� I would ]ike to advise you of the fallowing, relative to a Townhome Development currentiy being proposed by Mr. Vernon R. Colon of Fede ai Land Company. I am in favor of the granting of a variance to the 10 acre ordinanc for Planned Unit Qeve3opment, as the applicant`s parcel cantains only 5 62 acres and additional contir�uous property is not available. In addi ��n to the granting of a variance, I am also in favor of the Planned Townhome Deveiopment by Mr. Coion and feei that this develapment wili benefit the entire community and fallow �he continuity of the high standards of The City af Mendota Heights. Sincerely, Name .��- �-�l�'`_'�. t ,�� Y� (/'. Address f /i '`� ��-� l��' --- �� .Tuly 29, i9$2 NOTE TO COUNCIL: Similar letters received from; James Reagan, I.455 �'armdale Chester Sazensk3, 1805 Eagle Ridge Dr. Phil.lip Bi�ulk, 210$ Timmy Rd. Robert Cle�nens, 1138 Sylvandale James Miley, 1$45 Eagle Ridge Dr. Dr. Richard Car7.ey, 1271 Sylvandale Rd. Kenneth Slater, 1342 Cherry H111 Rd. Leonard Halper, Z850 Eagle Ra.dge Dr. Richard Rosacker, 1$50 Eagle Ridge Dr. � Mr. & Mrs. L. Anthony 1133 Cascade Lane Mendota Heights, MN Gumbrill 55118 July 30, 1982 The Honorable Mayor Robert Lockwood & Members of the City Council Chairman & Members of the Planning Commission City of Mendota Heights 750 S Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mayor Lockwood I would like to advise you of the following relative to a�Town Development currently being proposed by Mr. Vernon R. Colon of Land Company. � �1 ,'I'��. , . Y�•.., � � i., :.• r� : , r, i �. • '1 � ��i� ti �vr eral I am in favor of the granting of a variance to the 10 acre ordi ance for a Planned Unit Development, as the applicant's parcel contains nly 5,62 acres and additional contiguous property is not available. In addition to the granting of a variance, I am also in favor o Planned Townhome Development by Mr. Colon and feel that this de ment will benefit the entire community and follow the continuit high standards of the city of Mendota Heights. Sincerely . . Anthony Gumbrill 8-3-82 NOTE TO COUNCIL: Similar letters received also from: Mr. & Mrs. James Vitelli, 1163 Ivy Hill Drive ' Austin Stibbe, 1300 NW National Bank Bldg. Van P. Harwood, 638 E, Cook, St. Paul, 55117 Mr. and Mrs. William Walker, 711 Maple Park Court Mr. and Mrs. Girard Minea, 1691 So. Victoria Road ,I O.J.J. = the �rel op- '� of the 27 July 1982 , PLANNING REPORT CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: � LOCATION: ' ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 41 ; �� 82-13 Vernon Colon South of Trunk Highway 13, Wes Miriam Street Variance to Minimum Land Area / /� rly of PUD 1. Vern Colon (Federal Land Company) has resubmitted the proposal f r a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for sixteen townhouse units (form rly submitted as fifteen units) on a 5.6 acre tract of land at the w st end of Miriam Street, south of Trunk Highway 13. The PUD Section of the Ordinance requires a minimum of ten (10) cres of land in order to qualify as a viable submission under the PUD re ulations as described in the Ordinance. The City's Legal Counsel has adv sed the variance should be processed prior to consideration of the PUD i self. If the variance is granted then the PUD plan and other required xhibits and data can be considered under the Special Use Procedure for a proval of a Planned Unit Development. 2. The first PUD approved in Mendota Heights in the early 60s was t e Ivy Falls Townhouse Development. This development utilized the norm 1 single family residential density in the form of townhouses concentrate on the easterly end of the property. The westerly end had an extremely high water table making it difficult to develop. This space was thus pres rved, and seven acres of it was dedicated to the City for a park. Utiliza ion of the PUD thus provided a substantial benefit to the community and the immediate area around the PUD tract. The approximate area of th t PUD was 26 acres. Another early development utilizin� the PUD Principle was that of Somerset 19, located at the northwest corner of Dodd Road and 6Ventworth Avenue. In this case, a substantial area of wetlands and draina e capacity was preserved by concentrating the units in the form of apartmen type structures containing condominiums rather than the mor.e typical orm of townhouses. 3. Obviously, as the land ar� involved in a F�articular PUD gets sma11E potential for achieving the major objective in using the PUD conc (preserving natur.al open space) rapidly diminishes. If a single containing two units allowable on a 30,000 square foot tract werE as a PUD, there would obviously be no potential for any substant: preservation of any natural amenities. The question then, become what size parcel encompasses enough land to provide for this poi The extent to which this objective is achieved should be applied , the tructure proposed one of tial. the CASE NUMBER: 82-13 APPLICANT: Vern Colon Page 2 parcel in question on an individual cas� basis. We should thus be asking ourselves, "Is any substantial portion of the amenity being preserved through the use of the PUD on the property in question in this case?" 4. As you know, Mr. Colon has applied for a single family plat providing for 12 single family lots on the property. Such a plat was approved distributing the housing units very similar to that of the proposed PUD, utili.ing a cul-de-sac off Trunk Highway 13, in almost the identical location of the proposed cul-de-sac access in the PUD design under consideration. In short, this means that the proposed development is similar to that of the single family plat in terms of distribution of homes, with the major differnce being that the housing units are constructed in pairs (two units per structure), and that the cul-de-sac is a private street rather than a public street. Looking at it from a standpoint of distribu- tion of units only, the PUD serves as a method of rezoning the land from R-1 to R-2 (duplex units). 5. The purpose of providing a variance provision in any Zoning Ordir�ance is to allow a means of application for relief from a particular standard in the Ordinance due to a hardship condition caused by some physical property of the land. In this case, the hardship would appear to be that there is no way to expand the acreage from 5.6 acres to the required ten (10) acres, inasmuch as the property is bounded on all sides, either by existing single family development or Trunk Highways. That represents a physical condition appropriate for application for relief, but only if it is perceived that the intent of the Ordinance is achieved through the provision of open space achieved by dispersing the density in some manner to achieve that objective. The PUD as now proposed concentrates a higher number of units closer to Trunk Highway 13, thereby leaving more open space on the southerly high ground, and in an areas westerly of the cul-de-sac. The plans indicate a proposal to construct a putting green in the latter area. Does this offer substantial amenity to be considered adequate reason for the variance? 6. One of the problems perceived in reviewing the plan is that the concentra- tion of units near Trunk Highway 13 results in structures being within nine (9) feet on the east side of the cul-de-sac pavement area and within 12 feet on the west side. This condition can be corrected, but represents at the moment a mis-use of the flexibility provisions inherent in a PUD process. 7. The distance between the two structures throuqh which the entrance to the cul-de-sac passe:> is approximately 46 feet. If this were a single family development with a 60 foot dedicated street, the distance between the structures would be 120 feet. . ' ' - ) CASE NUMBER: 82-13 APPLICANT: Vern Colon Page 3 8. We have suggested to Mr. Colon and his associates that they work closely with the contiguous property owners, and adjust to their concern . As you know, some of the neighbors in the past have felt that the b nefits of the accrued open space that are possible in a PUD process, wer not handled in a way to mitigate their concern. This speaks to the int of the size of the parcel, inasmuch as if the site did consist of t e required ten acre area, the location and scale of the open space accrued y concentrating the density in certain areas could be more meaning ul. This is, in fact, why the ten acre minimum was established when he PUD regulations were initially established by the Planning Commissio and Council. � The new PUD Plans as submitted indicate a concept of unit design that appear rather attractive. This is, of course, not the issue wit reference to the variance to the ten acre minimum site size. With respect to that question, the factors are very similar to that previously consid red. The principal question is then, does the five acre parcel as cur ently conceived for development, provide adequate open space amenity ( ither public or private) that mitigate the impact oi the higher concen ration of density in various parts of the site? � � � ..�.s...�. - 'r � . � ` ` � � _. . '., • ' , . .'� �� , , ., , t . �, r� •�- � �•�� ' .7 � � • • .r r � - - - • .-�� • r! , � / If � , , ' s � � � l. t_.c" � f r�� . � �r f ' �1• ♦`v * �' � . ` , . " � rt . ' � i 4 I1 1 �� ' • � • '� • ��(� . . ��r'.r^ �t . � � �lt � '';�.� �� . �.,�. , �,f:'^.,�' -. _ � i . 1 • • , -4 • � � . . � � ' , � •.'r' . . � � ,�:\, ' „ . . y; ; �; �, ry , .�,,: � �� .� h , ., � � . � , �; "" ' :. � ; . � ; • ` '� � IJ ' . , �� . �, �., �/y� -,� ,; , r� �' ,' , • ; » , . � �i�� ,��a� 1 �/� //J >^� � `�` �,\ '! �.� . .'� � " f:,.� •, • s .-:_ :�._�k. , .- . :.�.-� - ��'r p t.y. • � . ��s-srr: - �� Y,,',`, �' f' <�\ ,,r �� .,�. � � �! � ' ' } : _ � • , � ,> . � �� ✓ L F j f � :::�:� ' � ; - ; -.--r,�.- ;I� ..,�, :-%4 -,.; �� .� _ �,_ . -�`�`- . : , � � . !� ' , � , f=. ._ ', �1'11`\./'�4,�� l � � % � � � • � � T � + � +�� c4/+ �'� .%�' %�'+' �"�'� �� i� � L '� � } •� �• •.• •�.�• �; � F�r� ••s -r � ' N� i . %. � ~� ` • • • �� • � • • r ; ,� � . ; .;¢" .;�,r � i � ' : �/ ; , / ; ,; ;� .: ;,r � �S!, j�. � • . , � . : <' / � .;" �:- � a�z�` '. . . • . • • * . ,f r ,� r�' i,�" j �•� ,' �, � . ', � , �' . ` ,'� � �IA /r r . � • • 1 � � . r ( � ± . � , / ' � •� �,,, ��+ � . � ' ' r • • � ^., •t� �,�_ , •y •, •i , � • � � � • •r• • i y'/ � /�' ` � ir� �„ � ` '� ��,�� ,� ��• l , .�f �_ , � � �� • • - � .( � �� t.v�� 1 �� • • � � • � � / fi *` ��.w�, � �.�� 2 �' • < a .�� • '�. � � o- ...s.. ` �, '' ., � ^ / I, "��; 6' �� • 1 • • � • / �...�}-_�-••_ `,�� s ��:jw . � • �� ! • * � • i ' �' :.Yt . r`� � "� ' NORTN � • • • � J �' '�.' �u • i . _... . . ', (•'� ��'• '�. . `'. " i M� '� ," . � . { l • , f , `J • 1 � U \ i � �'� fi `•� . , � � �: � '� � � ��•i� • /f . � � � � i . � � �- , ��„ , � w � � , �. � . Y'( i / �t "' � i � • -- � . � t * ' ` '� �� ' � ` / . y � ' :� f • � , ' \ • s � • � • s • • ._ - _-. � `".`� • . .� �� ;, ; , ' l; � + ` �-T ` � . '.., . • � . � . . . . . � • .,, ; �,�� . * ..._�� f • . . . • ' • ` • - - . .� . . . • . . � : r� 7 •�• � � � � • �'� � i . . _ • ' • .. i / � � •; • . �.. � .T �.. �� s �• � � • . . � � .: .' ,� . , \ . . � . �: �• : . � .� • t �i w, � � .. � � _� 1 ! ! . � •` . = . l� . +i y . • • • _ • . � i � � ' • ... _, • r • * • . � + .. � 1 • i i . �� t �-_.... � . � � y • i' T • � 1 ` • • .• • • � ` �; � • i � �.. � � . � . . • � _... ' • . � � . ' ' ��.�a..�a- �� . // - .r ` . M r I , �o.�ea� ",Zi'� ' • . � CMOOI F �� . uwxc T T T� �, -5 i ,"� • • �:.� • • . . .� ; �. . •I_ • . . — — � 1 Mt�4i� :.:r;� i yr� � /i . � � � , � � • — � i" _ � , — =�l�� / � { •� ; � � '. _ . __ . i { ` • � • • - j ,,,,,, �„/ ' • s � � � • ' + � r ' ` - --• - ' ,,,,y..� • �. ..�_ � �,'� t � � • �• . r ��: ', , � ` �'t: ! �I � � i il _. - � � ' :_.� � . �....d.�a- / ( � � .:� ��__ . j i .�. ��; - �_ ,.. � �. , :.:�:j, � , _. . � . f" 54MERSE7 ► __ i/. + � � . • � . . . ` �� . � �. � ,_, . . S� ��. �.[ � . • Y l 1. . ' • r!-' • �[ �;r / . ...,"�.... � ' + u ,,..,., + , . .. �� .. �9k� �• f t�`. ;` . f CAS� NUNiBER: 82-13 i .�w , ,� � APPLIC.�NT: Vernon Calon (Federai Land Co.) : I•�� ' �•'','' [_`-- �_ ZiCTIC}N: Variance to Minimum Land F�� , � . Area for �tli) � •.i'• , � y `'-T. c:l , � . YT T—� �• r'� �.- �• � MrNTWOATN , /�i , , y� u � •M _ I / � . i ' � 1�41t1t n� ' ' . ti � W .^-^ ♦ t"' —... _.. . r 4. , _ _ . _ . t � , fipplican� %�fi@ : .• ,"�f,a'� ` ' ' { ` �1 ,� - ` � f C�se IJa, l7 / �� Czty af t�lenc3ota 1:e3.ghts llakota Col�nty, t�1:i��r�esota APPT.,ICA'i'ION r'UR CU^]S 1.111;RATION ' o� ' PLANNING RE,Qt)I;ST ,,, � Date of Application�,-l3-g�- . � ee Paid �1G� "'` �b97 't,seB•sln��,�/7� �l fi f/✓C' ` --- L�st First � fid d r e s s:�7�Cf�/� G�Gr� ��,__�'. ,.5�`��lc� i��amb�r and St,r�e� City ' Owner ' . . - I� � in e : _�-� 1.�. " Last � . Fi�rst " . Address: 21i�'ZG� /�, �vss�.�'_J�?i+5� � `' ; � � A7L�Ler and Stree�� Lity , � , � , a � ;, Str2ct Locatzon of rroperty in Qu�stion il �1 D � �� '� .._ _�� ' _ _.__._.__,�_ L�gal D�scription ot Property: . ��. �—�-t—r. .� ��. ��1,..—� �-t"" t .. s � �.r ,.�� _ _.._ _--- ._ .. T?TrP nf R��ia��t: z � � . k 1 r , s � ' �� 4 , �r. ' ; ' . t �� ' •. _ ',.� �i.: , , � ,. , . 4 �� 1 �1 ', . � . ,Y � ;}, 7r,tr , • . I .r. n z a. a .t , <r • 5..3-D8 '2� - S-�ate Zip Code 'elephon NO. �j/.3i "? 5�t�'t,� I Ini ial S � v� l .r�, • .$�"//3 State Gip Code Rc��oning � }( �V�riance , Cc,nc�itional Us� P�rmi ��SuUdivision Apprav�l P1ar� fipproval i Canditional i3se Pe�mi.t for P. iJ. D. Minor Condi�ional t7se Perm t � Rezoning Wetlands Permit Other � t 0 . ,. _. - ,_ � n_. . _. , ` .- . . . _ .iUT V@y i0I' :— GEffY REFINING AND ��iIARKEFING COA�P,At�j� Dc-� cri . r_i c�r' . a - • - d Al ] that nart of tl-�e P,:'•rthwest 1/�'� i�f Sectic�n 25, Towr�ship ?H, Ran�;e ��, c�escril,eri �-s r�e�ir�ning at th.e [Jest ]/`+ c�•rner �f. said Secti^r ?5; thence East al^.n�, the S� utl: iii�e �r ��,i . Nortlzw�st :;',= G.:ist�ar.ce ..t •'►'�:��.0 feet tU th� Sc:��theasterly ri�ht c�f way line �f St�3te �?i�hway Nn, !��; thence Nr_,rtheasterly alon�; said ri��}-it c�f way Line and def lecCir?, rf the ieft �r. ar.�l.e .�E ;'' ��e�,rees !�: �r�in��Ces .:C sec,.:nds a distance ::•f !Ebi,.;,S feet tc� tlze actual p�ir.t uf t�e�riniiin� :�f the land tc:� r�e describe9; tlience East i50.G feet �lef lectir�g t.:• ttie right ar� a�.�;�e c.f �: �e�rees ?_0 minutes; therlFe Northeasterly 1`L3.� feet deflectin�; r_,� the left an Gn�'•_e _�f :�G �,eerees ?0 R�in��es; tt�ienc� I��rtt�westerly 12ti.�2 feet at riKilt an�;Les to the Sc�urheasterly rir�ht �f way iine of StaKe }[iKhway No. 4�; thence Southwesterly ��':.r.� sai.d ri>;hr t;f wa�- line 2C'�'.� feer t� r.t�e actu�'. p,int �-f !>e�,inclin;.;. 0 0 � I hereby certiPy that this is a trua and correct representation of a s�svey of the boundaries oP the land above described and of the loc�tion of all buildings, if ar�y, thereon, �nd all visible encro�ichments, iP �ny, irom or on said land. Deted this �� '-` dny of �'�--_� • -_ , 1968. - C�RLSON �c CAHL;�OPd sv�tvLYoxs � . ,:. by �L:inn. uog. No. � 5648 � �- _ - . _ - <�.. - . _ . . r - _ y • . . . , , . , r----- • • - — -• • • •- ••-_-• • - •—.�..---� --•—� '9"d 57•O' _ - '� 4�i1lo' ��+ST�.�I (�.h. GOti10LG c�...,G��ro o�S�kwSLict n++� r0 4 R. '_' ' __ "� � �iZ-�c�✓�i Dn�t T p . � � 1��. TSGr � iw�� ►hc0 P cf 1M�� L\ T�� R W.I+iAflrl, �O dT_a � � . �.yi4u'+w �� Tiw�w.'.�Fl ` I _J�_J._J� IJ.wISC►�r4`� r �� `Sf�.11T wc � ��EG v4 i1 �/ 1 iv ^" 7�1P�"�56R5 t � � 4u o YST�..LL NE� C1f��6 ' �4 YO�lC AiGYi J�+ 5�20. ¢E^ov y G^�^ � Srrt�r h71�� f1) {oo�u Sr.� G�uo(�T lTS Q�nOv4 EF��T ��So7►wL Mi„ w6w �w ��T. �S�w1.�n� „ '.� tic.wovE cr c S �»tiMs�� \ � n.�..�o ri�� T an�..��5 � T� J STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY No.49 ' �t 000a acab - PLOT PLAN scu. ,�* Iw�n� �1� W� :�� v.Y e��1 M U)�]I _..____. .T. ....._ _. ._ ES'fIMATED EXPENDITURE - SM i LESSOR G CAPITAL � 2 EXPENSE FFILE� E�MQ(�EL 1-CGHO�G t}�tiT�w� �Na.�.v�HV iw p^�r��,� ),IwS �.�L w�w �u►ll P tiGL�N4 �-iwSr..�� n.rw v�wq� FLGOTw4 � {-�N'�jTT�LL N�W S\GYS�T`(� LIISr�IN W��y. • F`t10R�S�p p.�0 CGMruTML4j' ►/yOV• 7 Krra'c To ri.T. -r.• o.. ow(.. (.Rnc•cc.c-�u� CC-�tovE Ef�ST •4 S�V�+ � STowoucv o �i�yc � ��,�•.T�� v, w�., s.4� +/� i+�r+��'rS�ticn� B-�e vo�� OTHER RESTRICTIONS SPECIAL SITE FACTORS EXISTING IMPROVEM[NTS STRUCTURAL LIF[ AGE CONDITION EXPC-CTANCY Getty Refining and Marketing Company DRAIYN Bl".J. VANCE SCAIE: 1��= 40�-0�� OATE 2-16-82 LOCATION HIGHWAYS ;�` 149 � I10 iv�Eid�OTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA nUTHORII Y ` �+DATE R F. C� -- - - --,..-- • ------ --- .... .. : .... ...---------- REC I -- -------- —. _ .. .-_, . _.--• - -----•---- ----- - REC � ENGINEERING SUAIMARY 0 0 �l S T A T E M E N T Variance - To install new image sign on existing base. There presently is an approved variance for sign location. Seeing the site was landscaped around the sign based on previous variance plus relocating to new setbacks would locate the sign in the blacktopped drive areas. 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 23, 1982 T0: Planning Commission FROM: Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Surfco Sign Variance, Case No. 82-15 Getty Refining and Marketing Company has requested a varianc be allowed to install a new Surfco sign on the existing sign base shown on the site plan. The original sign permit was approved by Planning Commission on October 27, 1971 and by the Council on Nov 2, 1971. The reason for the variance request to a prior approval is t new sign contains more square feet of sign area than the existing Upon review, we find that they will not be over the maximum allow sign area for the site and staff would recommend approval of the ance requested. to as t the ign. i- � . 27 ,7uly 1982 PLANNING REPORT CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 1. 82-15 Getty Oi.l Com�any Northeast Corner of D�dd Road � Trunk Highway 110 Variance to Sign Location i nd The existing service station at this location is proposed to be emodeled closing-in the existing service k�ays and other improvements with'n the interior of the structure. They do not propose to convert this pace to a convenience store. The existing sign consists of 36 square fe t, and is located within six feet of the right-of-way of Trunk Highway 10 and within six feet of Dodd Road. The proposed sign (see attached sketch) would consist of a 46 sq are foot sign at the top, with two 20 square foot signs on either side of the pylon pole, equaling a total of 86 square feet. The Ordinance provide for a maximum of 100 square feet on a pylon. Additional signs are proposed on the building, all of which are Ordinance requirements. 2. One of the reasons for approving the original sign in its locati close to the rights-of-way as constructed, was that the sign was relatively small, being basically six foot by six foot. Our pri concern would be that of the hanging of the price signs on the p applicant proposes to use the existing pylon �ole for mounting t thin the as cipal lon. The e new sign. 3. The applicants indicate that the hanging of the price s�c�n is cr cial to their business. Our concern is that the hanging of such signs c uld have a deleterious affect on the single f.amily residential area on the est side of Dodd Road. Ti�e original intent of �l��cing F�ylon signs on ser ice station sites was to identify th� brand, and the ��reser�ce of the servic� One wonders whether c�r not it would be ac9ec�uate to �rc>vic3e for the p ice signs on the structure itself in accordance with coc�e requirements. 4. The normal setback rec�uir�d for a sign in this district for this purpose would be 30 feet. The r�quired setback in the Ordinance for ser ice stations for the building is 60 f.eet. The bui]ding meets that r.quirement. 5. The applicant also indicates the intent to develop new lighting where th2 source of the light is shielded. The addition of this will be an asset t� the sik.e compared to its present condition. Eor design lighting 0 CASE NUMBER: $2--15 APPLICANT: Getty Oil Campany �,9 •2 ' 1 $ Page 2 6. The applicant would have the right to canstruct a sign of up to lOp square feet if setbac3c 30 feet fram the proper�y lines. The site design as it presently exists would make that difficult �.o accomplish. We suggest the , Planning Commission and Cauncil may consider leaving the sign zn its present locatian, but restricting its szze as was established zn the previous policy c�ecisi.on when �he original variance was granted. , �` � / � � � ' � � - f _.._ _ ' ._ r'', "1 , i • � �1 ` � f ! . • �. � � • ' • . � . . t '. : �� 1 �� _ I I ' ' • � � � ,` ' !tr 1 i _ �'•�,_ ♦ _ t' . -'+ ( � s . r. I • a � L ;� ! , • . . I _ . _ _ �b�- � . .7 . ! 7' - • . ' • . � ��, J y � ;r , i "—� � „� �. . _ _ _ _•. � . `/,' � .'�• � \ i _'. �� . _ ---_._.—_ '` ! ^, i • /. • " _• � �,1w,..i+� • ! � rC � ! ! �' ` �. ;! � ' • __ . .. ._. . _` r. � / � �• _ + _ �~ .. ' . � . � ' r o � • Y � � . • � e. i�/ . y � � ( -f . . � � �vrc � �� ); " . A r.. , _...T _ t i _"" — . , +• � . `� ; . '�i � / . . .. �. � • • ' , ,\ ,,,. � ' �.1 • IX + �/ � • ' � . ' �\ • � / • � — } . . . .•. , � . \ � - � ' . � l t � , . . . ! � . ��. ` f 1 • • :, •� , ; + , .;�, I . . . • � � ( ' � `"_ � ' ` k" � � ;; '�y' y l . , . .. . �� . + . � � �� l 'j� � . .. ' . . • t ' ' , tl' � a --� '::'• i:`•r.'� . r • N1� ` - ��. _ r.� ..�� , � " t \' Y ` 11�.� h4 �.`�I f �•i I • �' � K�' � . . � ' ��. �� . ..� _ - _..-_� "1 _ . _Q �w - _ � ^ � -� f�.�� • -r...... r kF • �'.�.• �. �. • � � . �. . t i� � � � w � r y� _ - . � -�,� ' ':� _ - --; �� -� � - _:.�_'_:.� f- - - � ; � - aS � � i�`,b�:' .i e r� � • �-_-^�._� �i.�-"�.:�5;,' �. y ` U��:�• j N -.� �-------r.--• O„ �.L..'-`'�— I I ,i', � w:r .�,� �, . . . .� , . .- ' _:� ;�:. � fOtf CQURSE 8 C4UtuTRr CLU9 � ,- �:'t �i,l�f�'Ct , . . PRIVATE) I� , :d�,. ::.�;:_ • Property . �.___._. _ !t � �t3.hF ,r1_,�` ' Gt 1 '� �� js.� �"r ` � . j � • '�"- � � t. . � Y'';••� �,� �� __ _ "'�'//�� r . ` • ■ .� j � � y��,�. �', NORTH i ,' ;' .. s-. A _.. - a—t".; � iZs �~� T� «��i �� #•Y,: �t _ � _...' '� __ _� � _ _ ' ' � �...nafiz • �' �nr'• i o � 1.�� i '• • • \ �� 1 � �R •' • ' • �� ' l • r ` • ! 'sl ! • t;��* _ � • 1r • � �i' ' � \ I � _ 1 • : t+ . �,�� 4, -�. .F I "• M4 \` -"----'"-��. �- --- i -- - . � �. . , L�..A � � ` ` � � 'J � '' \ ! � .�� . � � •L/{�• ` � i� � . ' ' � 1 • I ' • � .• � ' � � . � �•t t � ' � ' N« " � • �w ' i � ' • j Si�fl1 M'r[11 � � � � f ' , � ' SU�•1111TIOM • • • ' • � -- 1 • 1 .. ^"�'�.i '7 " i- .� b .*,. : fl'MII CO _� LMtlT , �..n`..rn...""' � � vi �_ ' aRK Y MARQH ' � � ' � »y ; � • .. � J� _ .. r 1. }�pxRx t\ . , � , ` � 1_.,. � ' ;'• �' � ' � . , .� . i • M � • • O ---,- , � � �r � % ; � • ' � � ' •. . ♦ �' - ,,,.- ��l }' ` - � '..._' � _ _ • • . � '.• • • • � �� •� \ � .. * . . • ♦ y 1 '/'� � . -� � r — —r--�,—� r_---_ . r . . _ . . � . , : -' .. _ � � } � • fz„� + / # .: . � ' � . � . . .` ;� Cca.se Na. G�` ��% � . City of s1�nc3ota ll��z��hts ' Dakota Ca�inty, t�1ir►r7��:�c�ta . • . API�LT.CA`TION FU12 CUNS,fU1.,fZATTON ' of � ' , , PLAi'�UING R1;QiJi;S'I' " Date of Application �'-o�-�'�Z k e e �' a i d�,,.� .��. �} -f- a1�L? .� 0�'Sc/"d , fipplicant �� a m e: Thamas P. Ba.� & Assoc�i..ates BY--Thamas P. Balyk, Esq � - L�.st First � Ina. ial fid � 7' c s s: 3570 Lexington Ave . Narth St . Paul :Minnesot 551I2 . I��.amb�r and Str�et Suite I09 City State Zip Code Own�r �'elephon No. (612) 4$3-9205 ' � � ,� m � : Minnesota FSL Gorpcaration., Tnc . � , . ______ F i�r s t . ' Lust Ad d r e s s: 355 Mirmeso�a Street St. Paul I�u:,il:,er and Street �C:ity . ; Strect Locatian o� rroperty in Qucsti.on n _ _, _ n.....,.{- ,,,...,a rT.,.,3.,, ,� i �„o , . � Inz ial Mirmesota 5510Z Stat� I Zip Cod� —t,rCcscs—vvcwv—�.......�-...�.......,...- �.,....�.__ Legal D�scription of �roperty: Lo�s 19, 20, 21, 22 and_23, Bl.ock 3, Delaware Crassing, Dakota and Lats 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 2, Dela�;�are Crossin�, Daka�a i i'�%�P f1t K��lj�'� t • : , i : . ; :jt ! ! . �; �_ A rPnl,� a� . , ,�, ?�finnesota. , M-ismesota Rc.-zoning �Variance ' Con<�ition�l Us� Fermi �Subdivisian Appratial yPlan .fipproval Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Minar Canditional Use Ferm t Rezoning � Wetlands Permit �' Other ; t � h � pE�.A1f��,RE C(�OSSI(�G 2�!D ADL�(�! lOf� P!:[a�p�n��av r�er � � � � . \ � _ , — � • ' . • —" --- �_ .__ — ,_,_ �-- . j . ' II:W� � x .a°p , s•.+'.+a. � � . , :w � i f �i."�.� ' _" •� � - :ivRT• • ..'�,�r�' �• I L �Giii� „.lr�� I . � . r I ¢ •i�� /Jtall l, I!).fi�/ �� I[�'(�l�/i�� /Nt4 LC �� ' �� , � G� - ��:� . .TK' � � • T � : I ' �� In • Y �• !14) � . . `\ a 5 %�','C•.; �� / � •-. ..... . . e _'�" " .... .. .... `'�� '� ,.i.. y- -- �. �� « f" �\pn�� #� 1�� / • /�` �'• { r�> / • I � - _��`�--��,—`4.--°n ;s �r ':,�—�� . � d � ' . .� /�� 1--- � — --1-----, �� •%� \ � � r � � e � �--r-� I i c ` /'i � � I / `\ \ � t"y� -,�r-- _—_-:• �� / `\ /� r -�\u,.c`.,a ---•/ �'-r--" � \�� \ _{ --- � p ; �• /, .� � '� � 2 ��y,// '`�5 " � �, �F y \ i � � � ^ 2 ��.:� :�_:J -<� ,� 3r �� F. _-- - / .; :- � i ,�-: � r-- -- - _ _ _ �"` � � '� � . �: .. . .. ; : �. _ . �. . � _ . ��..; y, �, , : - , . ........_ . -.... ., :;: �� R , .. � � � i4 \ / � � r �~ ,,' �/ Y � . '�� '/ / \ /� �-- -- — .R ��,,,,; `'��d� . �\\ ..�'� i r � � �// � Iiq.�e.. ,: bs •\\ � �\\ 3 /� I ` 23 �\ ��' 'T'f // � � �--- — �-- -- � •- �• �`\ /� L I\ � , , �� `` j l � � � � � . �------.. � / � � ��. . . ; a >' � , / - . � . " PROBE ENG!NEERING CO3 INC. t YCt,TM 0 prtorcarr OcscRirr�rw t... ,.�., ..� . �.... a i. �n.••. .� .. .� . �Gli�v.�R[,,L40tilr.�O•�+o3, �� c.:., , n.._...�� ...� r• - ^� e'� .. 27 July 1�a82 PLANNING REPORT CASE NUMB�R; APPLICANT: LOCATION: 82-17 Minnesota Federal Lots of Huber Drive and Ocala (see sketch) :r�ta ACTION�REQUEST�D: Approval of Re-Subdivision of L�and PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: , 1. The properties in question were platted by August Construction Co pany as a part of the replatting of portions of Friendly Hills, known as elaware Crossing, Second Addition. The lots in question were each platt d in groups of five at approximately 10,000 square feet each, consist nt with the original lot sizes in Friendly Hills. The applicants now pr pose to enlarge the lots by taking two groups of five lots and replattin them into four larger lots. The attached exhibit prepared by Probe E gineering indicates the ex�sting and proposed lot lines. 2. The properties in question have now been taken over by Minnesota Federal, who recognize the market for larger homes in this desirable area of the eity. They are therefore recognizing this much potential, and p opose to develop the larger lots to accommodate the larger residential st uctures. 3. The drawings indicate the existing and pro��osed services for pub ic utilities which appear to represent no problem with respect to this adjus ent. It appears too that the change represent� an increase in quality an desirability for the homesite and the future residences. It wou d appear to be consistent with the City's policies and desire for quality construction in this area of the City. � �. Fi D /� v 1\ v t0 �0�1• ♦ %d V � `� 4 ^ �{ � �� ' w ♦ �l �I; � ' � v � � � n r ! ,-1L.. x �f ,_ ivS y'L , � • t f� � 1 ■ir + ^r2 !s. . � 1� ♦0 �. ,. � , .. r( ; 1 ! � • . _ _ . �l � � � t _ " �- ' � ° EN t � at 4 ,.HE� � �qN� rt � ; O ' t i '�' . , . 4 •, �'�'��'�.. -.+� � . ��..��' .. )J 2 d I O O �r y ; � J 1 ,.' �, 4 � �� •' „ �; , ,� : � .rt is � • � , ; � � �'�3'�1'` �. -..��= y �v p ' �J� f %j� � � �/ , ' � _ -T''�' r .S \ d/ � � �� „ ` i�� " S/ �% f��f fil I�..,f i f�,� ;_ -� : 1 � � � �`��/ � f� :�j!%f /1 - -�--�� rif fif�� r" P�''P '� f j�� ""- ._-- 7, `�� „ � • ,%/,�� ' E. �Q'( f� � f� � -C . ' i f--'-..-- pG � ! t t a t `' C C�i% J '"� 0 �' � " � .� jf 11%f/ ' �� ,r .•,. , i ,,f1/ ,, • �- �-�-- - �; /a _ , 1i. ` �� ' "� ry� i � - � +l� �o t)`,` ' 1? . ,' . `--�I " � 4 ! � �'` �'`..�-�'" ` !. � ' F � , • ---`� � > > _-=� i J� -�' rS . '"� .� � �� . � `' •� q C p `�` 1 t f`�� i ,� �/" , ,� � • . � • ' . ,�, ,,r�� '4 dy t T ', t��C' . � ss ,,, . � � ,r P �a %� �r l ys �1 � � � `�il ` z ,, • "'` � � p� � �, Z : + � GflQ�' f ' • � 1 � h , , t't1 S' .' � �O ♦�R ,� -� �� f � �O 9,r : h � "� ` J�'� l'd .-�Ut � �;1 8 r j° 9 �J�e �s � . t s � v �os • y E !'� sJ.�* s>>� sl 3 _� � : � ' o � o �, , 3 ro `� s c S +s ti, i .� "_ =a , e, ( u s „ �; 7 �,t" fz M t b ' 7. t 'rV y 9,� �* � � S �,i- o � S � S � ? � ,. �,, � ' w � �. g h 'ri.r o , s . (I1 , � , .J J __„r�//"/' 8 . �"Q tj �' J1 j 1r�#�n�•-- ' O 1 � ' � � ' 0 G � �>>l ��,� - 7 �a ,,,��'* s 5 � E-; 9 `~ - � � ' �v ttJ V ', O h'', / t � iiys rs s .� �, �_,�r► i.� _. `-' Q v o� `tr "� p�� -� /' � O.- S �� d �b � � 3 9s. .� t Z ;'� �0 _ - � ` J �, . '� z `��,. �. _ _-- ` Q � � ` '�� ' �'F rr tt�, �� \ 15 7 ° ro • �� \ r 9. �6 �y .f°> '�` �A �l ,/ S _,,�o.�•--`-'' J 1 4 _ pa E NtlNiBER' M�ri eso�ao eR SU dyvisi°n �f � E_y-�,,. CAS �,�CAI3T = AP�Y°°al �A�''� ' P Ap d � � pCTSON� Lan .I � . � APACHE , ` n c CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 22, 1982 T0: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director and Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Delaware Crossing Second Addition Minnesota Federal Savings and Loan requested to replat 10 existing substandard lots located in Delaware Crossing to 8 lots, 2 of whi h still contain less than the minimum required square footage. All propo ed lots appear to be able to provide the 100 feet of frontage required at the building setback line. As shown on the proposed replat sewer and water connections will be available to each newly created lot. Staff contacted Minnesota Federal Savings and Loan in an atte pt to adjust the lot lines to the remaining substandard lots so that all lots would now meet minimum lot size. MFSL stated they did not want to do this because of problems with utility services. Staff feels that the 2 substandard lots could be increased to meet the 15,000 square feet requirement and the subdivision could then all within the exception portion of the Ordinance. A hearing could be waived and approval of preliminary plat forwarded to City Council. l� � �' #... ; � • f�r'�}� - , �;;� Case Na. C.�� , 4: ' � � CITY 4F MENDOTA HEIGHTS � �� • DAKOTA COUNTY, MTNNESOTA . APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION . OF � - , PLANNZNG REQUEST ' ' • Date of Applicai • . Fee Paid '�.� ,� Applicant Name: �e �tt"Z �t G�j�tr � � Last I�irst Address;t � � ra 4�`7 %�q/'i e. � , Number &�Street City �''� Telepli'ane Numb'er ; r$t�� 02 3 % ,: •� �, , . ' � 4wrier. ,.; � . . :, 'Name: ��C �m -� � �� {. ,_ ' ' Last • First , Address: Number & Street City , , Street Location af Praperty in Quastion: . • /O ��7 ��'ia �i' � Legal DescripCion of Property; � of . _ / ,�,� b'� �-,' / �' yd f _ ____L Initial _ �d J�'� /�--/7�.s Type of Request. State Initial State 0 i ��' � � d`-z' � Rezoning �� Variance Conditional Use Permit Condi�iona�. Use Permit for P.U.D. �iznor Canditianal. Use Fermit Subdivision Approval P�an Approval Wetlands Permit O�her s S/� �'' Z ip Z ip T0: FROM: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS City Council Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Off icer MEMO July 28, 1982 SUBJECT: Variance to Rear Yard Setback. Case ��82-19 Mrs. Richard Gehrz of 1047 Marie Avenue was before the Planning ( on July 27, 1982 to request a variance of six feet or to be allowed in twenty-four feet of her rear property line with a swimming pool. ommission to be with- To further explain the request, some background information is n cessary. On July 19, 1982, I had issued a swimming pool permit to Superior Pool Builders, Inc. A site plan was submitted along with the permit application showing the pool to be located twenty feet from the West property line, thirty-two feet from the East property line and thirty-one feet from the North property line On July 27, 1982 a location inspection was called for by the pool company so To Knuth and I went out to measure the setbacks to insure that the pool was locate in the spot where the site plan said it would be. We found that the pool was pl ced six feet closer to the rear lot line than allowed. I then issued a stop work order and advised the pool contractor and homeowner that the pool project cou d not continue until such time as the Planning Commission and City Council had rev ewed a variance application and was approved by Council. The Gehrzs' had not met with the Planning Consultant, Howard Dah regularly scheduled consulting meeting;and went directly to the Pla meeting on the 27th of July. Planner Dahlgren was in attendence at is aware of the situation. The reason for the emergency nature of t showing up unscheduled at the Planning Commission meeting is that d traff ic and vibrations from the equipment working on the Marie Aven earth and parts of the pool foundation fell into the excavated hole ren, at a ing Commission is meeting and Gehrzs's to the heavy proj ect the The variance requested would be to allow the pool to be complete and left in its present location six feet closer to the rear property line than allowed by ordinance. !� �✓ � Page No. 1671 June 15, I982 Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Resol tian Na. 82- 51-A, "RESOLUTTON ORDERING PR�PARATION OF ASSES MENT ROLLS FOR NORTHLAND DRIVEjMENDOTA HEIGHTS INDUSTRIAL PARK IMPROVEMENTS (IMPROVEMENT N0. 81, PROJECT N0, 6), NORTHERN S ATES POWER COMPANY STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS {TMPROVEMENT N.$2, PRQJECT NQ. S) AND MICHAEL S. DUPONT ADDITION TMPROUEMENTS IMPRQVEMENT N0. 81 PROJECT N0. $)". � Councilman Mertensat�o seconded the mation. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 SPECIA:L MEETING Councilman Losleben sketched a praposed plan fo the intersectian of TH 110 and TH 149. He briefly exp].ained the discussions he has had wi�h Mr. Toomey, the ownex of the Stand rd Oil S�atian on the corner. He aiso noted that he had set u a meeting with Mn/DOT represen�atives, Wilder representatives nd himself, Administratar Johnson and Planner Dahlgren, far a discussion on: the matter far Manday, June 21st, at 2:30 P, . He suggested that other interested Council uiembers migh� wis to attend. It was the concensus of the Council ta hold an djaurned meeting aG 2:30 P.M, on June 21s� to discuss the inters ction and related matters. CABLE TV , Counca.lman I,osleben noted that he, as a represe tati.ve of the Cable TV Commi.ssion, would be preparing a posit on paper regarding Cable TV. He wondered whether he should have a endorsement from the City Council, It was decided that he would end capa.es of his pasition paper ta the other Council members for their reaction. before submitting his paper ta the Commissa.on. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before Cauncilman Losleben moved that the meeting be a on Monday, June 21st. ' Counci3.man Hartmann seconded �he matian. Ayes: 5 Nays. 0 A�'TE S T : Robert G. Lockwood Mayor TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:25 � o'clock P.M. ' l i i Mary Ann DeLaRosa Deputy Clerk { i �he Cauncil, ourned to 2:30 P.M. ! ( `! � �� {� � �I �I i ' I �' i n° 0, tp� �y! � y�l � o �a o� bl o; q' o t� � ; �� ' �C � �'''' � � � � � `� � � �o � � �� \ t � q, � l � � '� ` . � 1 � �� 1 � � i � � �'� � ` 'ti � �` �� 210.�7�, �� , �, � '; '. 'y � � �t � � t 1 ��+ � � ` � ! �.r ' + ' . . ' , '� t �` j � ,. • 11 ; �� t � . � � l • � �' . `w i � 1) � }t . � � 1 ' ' � � � + � � r � � ' ' ` _r"y ; ��, t f , � .,y. ..�--"'� ` � � '. � �,,. !' �'�Ci�'! rad`iC f�� , � r � { � .`� ,� � 1 � '�� _.- r �# -C�" l��=�'1N � . f � ;� _,��'�;.,� . - ' � �- � ` / . � , ; ; - ,fi , • r �� ....% ', . � . �' f f � r �4 �, - , ,� , � ,-~ . f � i f �i t ' , � - - � � ' � (-� � � , 1 ' �� t � ` `'' �'''` '` ! ' O ,�' t � � 1 � , � �`�...1 r ,�' � � ' � f , �i 1 ` . J� ' � . , - , ♦ `� / . � I . r � �` ; � � ` �. ,� 6 1 r� -��, . �,, � + � J� � i � � �+�� , / ,�J � . �`' � r c'f � � ' � • , l• ,/' j � ` ! � �� j ' � 4� � � �j ��, 'K r f � �, � ..� � . ;� a�� . ;�~ /� � � f � �.�'= ' � $ t '� � � f/ � '�Z N� � � ��. � / � �� " �, r ��' � , � j � j ; t f �) � . r � � � � i - V� t { � i , .., . ! �. S��'� � � � , _.��iE1+�'..!"5 T � `I' � . O� � ` � % �� i��:K,. � - -- • �4�;�a -� ' f , . . ' � ' ✓ ; � .,�� ` - "-� -� � � *� .,•f . . � � � ' � �S � � ,j� �. �' F)5�9T'. �'��r "' �' � � �- . ,�.,� . Ta.P�� i�i�fG�i�Q . f '� • , r,,,..�"�'/�j/�`� � � � 'Sa i' �` � ; �,.�—'�''�``Y, �, . . ' `''(`�Jj'�" } ��,�r;' , � . � � � ...-"'" 1 c�,yr_ 1 i � � _7`� , l�• ' � �' �1� `,'� l F � ,i '� t �y � • . ''`��. p �"+fiTv :.�,�-.. ..._ '.'' :-t�trt� � _ _ - � ��'�r�' � �► . '� �'��''' .,..- � � . �r'�'1 �"C'7t�s► s Gul,..�1�• �AG . _ �,,._ � _ � , rf . ��c.�.�: �� . ;�Q„a The Honorable Mayor Robert Lockwood and Members of the City Council City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota +lei ghts , Mn . 55120 RE: Petition of Agreement and Recommendation for approval of vari�ance and P.U.D., Federal Land Company, Nighway 13, Mendota Heights, Mi�nnesota PETITION The undersigned hereby inform the City Council of Mendota Heights hat they are in general agreement with the development plan (Exhibit A) on he following described property to wit; Lot 3, Perry's Addition to St. Paul and Part of Lot 9, Audito�'s Subdivision No. 4 Lilydale, Dakota County, Minnesota All that part of Lot 9 in Auditor's Subdivision No. 4, Lilyda lying South of the South line of Cherokee Park Heights except therefrom as presented by Vernon R. Colon of Federal Land Company. The plan to the undersigned shall consist of (no more than) 16 single story townhomes in clusters of 2 units each and the townhomes will be ex landscaped. There will not be a swimming pool or tennis courts in development, however, there will be a putting green for the use of residents. It is also understood by the undersigned that each indil unit will sell�in a price range of $200,000.00. e, ng as shown :ensi vely this the vidual lJe recommend to the City Council that they cooperate with the deve oper on this project while also imposing the accepted standards developed y the City in similar projects. � , / , � _�; , � - -� � �� STREET ADDRESS %% � �ti��C�� 9�0 ,�U6 � oG LOT & BLOCK N0.1 ADDITION �� , ��.v � �. ��-�y /�2'G�ti�� ; / � � �i / i' /, i ' � i. � � � 1 l� /� / � /' � � � . �� / � � �./... � � � , . � - �� =r�� l�� , � ��`� ,� � P �.�,.��.� . � ` �,�� $"�O � �l/ � v �'- (� 0 c� w�, �.-., S`-�--' . . � �do� /p0/ � �. 9 �� , � 5 �� 1 ..s90 1�.'.C' �iC�- CT �;�5 �d,� c �� 0 � � � r 0 � ; { The Honorable Mayor Robert Lockwood and Members of the City Council Page 2 + Petition of Agreement and Recorrmendation for approval of P.U.D., Federal Land Company, Highway 13, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. NAME STREET ADDRESS � LOT & BLOCK N0. ADDITION _. t i . �� - /000 � ' . ; � 4�--�--rl ' . r � � � � �`7`' �t� �'�%L�`� ; „ 9 ' i��-�� -�'-�-� g � _ �'� � ' � � �. � � . . � �i�� i ' .�---�-�--- �l � � � � �� ' � � � Z � r � ----T - - � - - - - i � ; , � � , .... .. �.. . .. . . 5 �� .� - .�. z��•- - - - - _ - - ,c�. - .,�...:. � - �•s: a.: -r - , - - -S- - - �: - - - - �`� c�•- a� - - ' a. .. e::: rz:s: . �iir. Y wr $+-'�. 2 ��W �r '�J.-� � _ ji ..' _ "4'ii�u. :a`• � - � '.f'. ., r'.'>i+.i:W. :;,,y,. , � x?'.,sa.:., ^'t .- :i��r � 3�x � f ' ' t' �e` •'.aE,. - �e,+.;e•,. _ - ,�}_,� - .��„ .. .._ �. . .a-.� .. �a�:"'q..,:�;;�.at�:r'_--• �`-�'_3,..._:,.��.. `. : ' . �'' 3 `•^� ,c4.. <^.r _ - � --�!'�'� -.'rs0' .+:' - �+ c�'�_ . � - ' �Hl:...:_.C-��: +.s y;� - '? ^,L� �v�."-, , J • >L.. Ca - - - P. i, _ ~ei " : '�ir ' t �F:> _ ,.:aox..*- rS•`_ ;�£`' h!M �-��' h fi �� - xs.,' y r n '+ °a �`} - o�y� � ir- s•,...r=�, -'S- �{y� ..?�::.;.'R . y t. '�G� 1' ��J�."2• *�,�-.l`�'': . S' ::! E.. :•.Wo= 5 �.i:.r'J'�':,Y'.: ': �`�" • ` Sfi.� , 4'.7�. - � �:��^ � . .i:'.'.r.ia'a�+ 5.�' LPS .-Aa"a }.. i.y: ,•f ':'a_ - , `..� .4 - >S � - .! �.tiv`_"' �� . , eT =.- '.i��..s 3� - ...Y - 'k�.�' ::i�.... } " - � J%-"y:=d _ ,.� i, . " a(.. �.�s ,_if �. .r�i." - ;l. ..� .`'"�: � b �'� =i ` 1 . +r'. -� i "i.. x�� :i�i! A�'. 'fM: - .Y' - '�3'� ��-:ri„'� ��i�i- � '4� �:4. "�v� f ' _ ' . �'S«i�'y� _ _ " _ _ :$v[. ''!}� _ �:a=- •.-`a' "i - - � � ° ' nn � m„ - 3: �:c�':r. - '�+ +.-4 - "°':P.� ��..'`»!-.c x•' �s : ' �a,. :at ` �,;i'a ` :�,z... .i.:iti:.��.'oS„.. �"' ":3�::F.:,�� -r' ,.:��:+x.;r �'��.,:.. ".�*'. `yai... +.s.:r�+wt+�+. :wr_ it w.+�%�'! 'sb[en�F:. ,%.,.. '�Y�..�Vassi .{ - '='f.YnN:' '�.' ..a� ��d'x:a, stii;' eah:.iewwr.:' ..;� �•.e'�'�:n-4'�^+'�'A!ii?'::�tie+"b; .`�!e+c:ws .�. _.wisc;��':i'�ia�.'�f'v T�.. �" ^�3� }5ya+fiad��T"' � �.�f/ �t�. �-a�V,.;-��,i'�.,,;r,±�r..�w�",.,u.'a�. «�?.s,?�fic+'!��tu._ _ ,�: `� z-C^cs9`- N,'-, - - - . �'.. �� ' '^:b; ".?.x' ' _ _ >d..-c' ':a,:: - _ _ • ~� Jv+� �4 . S �Y. �� .1� . N. .�-. • " .� ' '�.r. ' -. .. � . _ ._ . �j . . w: :... . �.1 Y - '!':' t{ �y'�s��j�v � �fuN ' � 93 � y� - � iMi 'Y .:1«'i?'�T:.' ...."v. �' � F. •'k . - �P. t "" aJ WM1' _ }zi" �<,' . _ : �';,..ti _ t>; .�� , .i" i:� � �-'� . �:�* r - ,'Y:-. '�:�:;�c. i' �S� y �h' - , �T �1, . '�i 't'• e . .c�'' '� � � ..' _ . ro✓.,.. �:... ,�� y ��. Y"J'.. '1r - _ a�C - , - �.?ti:.:'4 '�.�. +JS''r.:..� � ';,-, '.�, , _�. _ :a. "rf` "' ' - <.�'�' .t . '':'�1 -- <'.�.. .�'a.{.. _ .. . p�� }� : .>, ._ .,- r �. ,,:, .. ,. , -.. _ ,.. ,.-. .,. , . . - s ;.. - r� �,�1.':. . . •` -' �.., , , ,.. � � � ,t . .. .., .� .. .. - ..�. �: . _�",._ ..: s':.-.'- s•. . '.r.'::�.r..'� `Y. �t.� . , ., . .. .,,.y.si'. . ;'.e: �. �. . ,,,,„.e }�. , ., �_ . _. . . 1 .Y . 9h ♦ . 1 .. _ . _ . T✓' . . ..y . a. . .. _ . .4 . ., �•, , ,.. - ' ;. : .,-_ ^•,,,,'�":.;•; Yi' _ ' `.-d f i. �qe+._ ..A.a, x,T :*•' =§. - ,.+. = :;'k� - �' ' h - `�4: . ,. . ,. ._ . .L. . „ .s. , �� ... •_ � -..e- , s., � .,_ ... >.,.� . ... . � '{^ y., .Y. L'<,,:-. �,,:t�c;.,. _ .,,,(.'.g'_i �,r.- ,.'ti ' _ �y, : ��- ._�,'�%a,-` � s,{y ^ 4'.0 ; . . _ , . - . . Y � 3" � 'r^+ , - 's.,i+:^�a"-i" >, a.�:'=.' "': - u^N f'� � - !'4` . - . �y.�`?!��..;!?'--`'- vk't!: =`�'�:t �'xa;'}'-.-'--R .f5 � _ . y_,`.�'' 'i»'e ":'z:. _ �y ''h•T- - ' f, - '1� Y, _..c". •.tn - _ _ ¢ " " , ' ' - _,� � �� ' ara : t.�,-� - ��.{ . �,. . ' S _ ,';;� �_x,�,. , 1. .�+", 'a.. a 7<..,•..:3• �r7_ .,r, _„,;� ' n.s� . ._.C°^'-'x - 4 ��'r"t s - - '? `< - - ��Ri':�4r'^ c.i'. V4:r:?" ,;' . [S :• y+� .`.�p �p ' � . . . � .,.:�. '.�_ .,.:. �..�: . . �i . � �t' - �F.c �G`-' *rY ,`.1., Jy� ' ,�-+-� ,5 .R" -r;. ..1=. _ , _ � _ c:xT�. � � - - r'�•+' �;c�� ,:y_,;>-�.. ':¢T'.�t.; _; �i,6S _ - „4 rt�,•' �:..�,c..; +,ti9' � �"�.� %!� =f}`. ,:��'a. :'.i�i' +�:i." �.�"� ;: -`,-,, . y� ' - a. ' �:�"=-: - A: ...+'.. M.a.:«.�..: rt c`;.!-,^;:.<_ .'i .'o' "r�� > i - '` w' < f - 'a . n, . .g, _ �` `''., n �t - .S - r � , ;,i: it : �d . �>.+� s'K-' _ '� R. ,4fb, c_ ' -y"�T' - 3'� - �. � . �. '; f � '">'l'� ,� � •'K� + . s.+n'�. " ..i� �:._' - ' 3 �'3' .S� _ «�y. � ` } - _ .,:aa �.. • i^' i w '�L..r �d - - . �; --.. �u,.. �yr� - s - ' t ��' z -i <. _ - _ , _�„ - ��.. . �a o�` •.,•`• . �.� x�• •� ' �r�e... �`�7" - . 9. 3 "l'k`�s'i�'�� ;��.�� .,ey-:. ".l. . - .Y . . � {e: i/}� �b' - Li-' - - �1�,�� - �'4' . i� � ,' �F' � .s.^ . . � . , - , _ ..=1. . ^ �., - i' ' '�a'x' . - . 17„_ , . :'`.i� � . . - 3 ..K L _ -.�+w. tt . 1 . - r B ' ^1�: � 4 \- , uf ._ .,� - _ _ _' . �'t+'s:� - � t� ' - . ^'t. � .�. . � - , r.�tYr+:..� . � Y e . '�:. � • �. • � F . - - A' i . W . . . - . - ' - - _ � . .. . .��. _ . � " �'4,>- . _ " . - _ k ' - Y � f• � µ � a �+' a- �� . ! SY _ al.��' � . %"• - . . _ . ��F-� ✓ - 't.� . ' - �;i .. - i - � �'{�. , ; �+. $..s. - �' - ' - `�}'.'� _ . n'��_ �.n::." - ',v,:._. �'7.�•:` ,.� s;i,�� 'i�,:� -wr..'�`�. :5u•`'a �s �-�ij��- . -t>,..:r.. ,.zxr• .ria�"�. F-ta y� .Y•' : d'.{. �iWi ,Y_+'td�. ��::`_�.. ...��._ � 4i ,�k�t' c -:�:,: .r. _s: �,,q> ::y+' ;�„ - :�:i< ;�,�i". _ - •1-:-.., _ i. _ ^Ffd. .e .iv- r��; Hi - �s.F:i ��} . •'l'•. '.a�^y.. 4:, v :05�•�� ' W `� .7�. ai � _ - i;,, ' ,.y'.n: � , D}.. - T:h�} - ' y^i' � . :.{-".'..,..., _ t, - . , ' - i. ` .�t)`��' _ ' _ _ - .-;. � j..; _ _ _ -�i:,-' I tk'�t ,. „y � ..�:_. <:�, s . - 3. - = - - , , � +4 . �e ' _ �,+7a'' a .. . " -i- " - '3.�. . . . wk! ' 'J - '�l.� ''�A'�F.'i^'' �N�� "A" c _ yT ��•_ ,,,) - '�i ��i' . � .i�A i . � �.t�'� : .� , `, h 1' . "'Ft. . . . . . . a . •r ,E(!' - `-V �' r'2' ' - . �� 1 . . _ ..Yr'i'. . �+Pt .�+ . - . 4`' , _ �i,: .� " ; � .. : . . �v . . e , .r .. . .. __.CM'�:� '`fi ' - :�i -. • . ".: . ' " ' ' It �/ .. _ ��, „ . .. �� ; -_ . . . . /� 1 , - - - - ,. � - '�. � _ ..� � - , - . , -;�: ,_ - - �. - - .➢. - „- .�c -- . , V.'r - ' . , i� , - . X � 'x'{'�.. af,'�. , r � . ' ' �.^"s� . � � '� � F . 1. 1 > . M . _ -.i i'i" i t+' , �. ... - � , ... i/ .i.:fi ' . ' - . .• . /i - 2 . , +.ti. " . '�L , • ' _ " _ •:Kn":. -J.: - , . - - . - - _ . • T . _ . . . .y �i}..�`.: .}. . � . �...'� _ -� .. - _ � {., 1 `�� 1 �! _ _ .i..: . _ �:S � _ .. . v." _ . . '_, s . . _ . - :'a, - . , . , . . , . - .. - • . _ . - �� . . _ .. . . . - _ . ._ . , � ,.: ._. � ;s.' +F.t,.:,F`.. .,,�" t , . � ..��,s . . ., . , . . . . ' • . . ' ' . ^ ` . ��'. , ^ . ` ' ' „ * - � . , , ,. . ( ' �.. � - _ ._ - -� .'a.".: _ . � ,._ � .. . _ - ,. . _ . _� . - : . � e �:° .• , � _ _ r ' F ' , t � . �wE. .^1; ^-�_: �..t �ti`� '- � t ' � �: T _ � . . ' ';t: . . . , - . _. ..r . 3t a�:cf�. 't. _; . r'�k', . � .r:� - - �...i <.'-••PJ,�.�.ay . . `'_ ' _ �� `;�,t �,� r'� ��_ t �ti" _ -_'yy._is. i s: �- • - . , ,- - _" . • � ., � i�` a'W�. 2.it.'�''` _ ' ':k �3. ,ae' ��!•.: ^ ��.+�;a`c��y��' "YR_ � _ , " , ' " . . , �+�,�-.'__-�+.,"�° . ��:gl a-� }R '�-Y�Ty,.� g�,.i _ 'yl .�, r :i��K.. `" � � „y.,��.7='�ti � 4��tl�f,..,. ,�.;_- ,_____._ -,-.-�--. _ -- . _ � . ,,.. -- � -•---... .__ . _ _ - - '-"-'-., -- :[is` _ - "' ��lI�IR �V�-�.(�a:,ii'Ti.�'w '��'� - �i.�.�a'k. _ ,,�y��_. _ ..ra"t..��.#v'>�:�,. '�' y'',.f�as%.r`�""•-" . , ` - . _ , ,- • " . `n � 3�= _ �8^,.�� e y . �.t;i _ _ � ..�,4's' a ��q^��.�s5 i � �j�.', ,�i} �''p•E'� W ..a �.� _ r`,� tr.R _ . " - • - - . ' ^ i - :w�...s?c :�� i'' ic:'l;i�, : •cta; ti��r`, �� . .?��-wt _ .-i:•. '�<N ir :'t4d c$' `�s•.p,� i�� r � v'i� `-:R�ir -�. Y:�}'•S..'»�.: '_K'" .�..'7'1 r:: ''y".«4�5.'d-f`` , y7','ti,�'S.,�¢s '"�.: - :� - _ ., tl�.J,r� 1y,� ��.;'E�1�? � . f " � •�j� ��Qc'F� _ „,�.,. • i � :i;.�. �� . -":`� ..n � ��'_...,y.n. � �'^ . -a�iF; W �xi°'}� ✓?.: Y'.:F E.. ^i'^,'�',�+3 ,C` '�1^.��'.�a ,y�� '4.,.:.�' 4'�'''* " "' , - �u,.�d"-'�",d 1 'e'+�-..`,:b��,"�:a.� �,t�.i,??�';��"'r'�.+c'r��'. � �i' +Fm9` s �:. � - '- _ .� ~ ' � ' - aF }x '.�v.` � :+."^�-�i� - :i� n �,a�" - � � - � s ..� � ' :F t x: - - � . ' . -, _ ... - � �g w_ Y.�..v wr.a; ` ' ,��,`. _ �- ' - y`:-� ' ",.. -. . . . � , � , � ' _ ,t,.' _ _ . .. . , -. .� - • - - �- _ .. z - � .' •._.-v , . _ .;.7�z . „ ��_' _ . : .. . . _ . - . ' l, . ' - `� .:�' �� , .� .-,+ . �, � - ' - , .. ' }� � f �J � 't-�:' - ck .w- '_ � n.� . { , �.- ; _ _ - - , - .- . " -� _ � f,-'� +i i �'^ 'i ;�T �- _ { . . ' "_ : _-•�---- _ .-- . . -, . _ . _ ' - _ _�- __ __ ... _ _ .a . .-.-. � :t == _ ' � . p ' T # : J.r`�i�- �' . - ., { ; - ' .. �- _r;,.•�. :� � � •.�.. - is_�1Q' :4. � . 4 n��:�:. .�= i � r��,, 9�:",r'-��'. � � � " .I. • i. -`� .-<R :!� i� j I , ' a M �' s , ., ' a • ,.. , , - -� - ��..._...._. - - - - - - -_ - - . . . r� ' ' ..� nFiV.:` ��'.. . ^_ y V _ . , .• . . d. ��"�.u"-�"; � t''`"•'' � J. * ' '�` . : . :� • �`'��'"`-','.�;�s='�� a�3:.- ` 'u�', .. , � � _ .. ` � , +� , • . � �..Y. . � -.�'�+,� '�--..r"'�- , � �... . - . . ` • ', � ' [ • . " , - ' • ' - "t` x ��``°'�'�"� e , - _ ' , .. � � � ' . • ,^,.i.�" •' . S'�.." is'...�••'� :F' . 2°4`� �,+ ' .-,.-,...�= � F..�Ff :�i:��?��`v<�,i'-�?�- .- ^6". . . , _ � . - .. d�� `tr�t!g �f.r, - ..`, . � _ :,� } - .. , ' � - , � . . • �ra;., � • ,�� .y. t . � �- . , .. � . ' � ,'. .� � :"..=Y.t-"`,'':`'.`F3?,'��,.�„' :i .. ` _ _ • " _ �. . `. ,� .,`k;F , � � ' r ' � . ! �; ' !F'..'�i`�eJ r "�'�:C�s'`.+cwJ^..'b. '.'t _-`4 _ r:� ^ . ' �%D ' F,�r,.. .l: r � F ' •'3.i ;'. �;` ' � � I,~ _ i }F I l,�,.d`•' Y } � �+f.s - '• � ` � f _ . • - . ` " y „�� .. .�. � `�� " . ' - r ,C. -� . i � i �_ � N'�+� ., .,, . '- � , „ � � ��- - - �.� �.; __ . _.. . .....____L'a'4'';.�', _ _ ' , � -. � . . . . : _ � . � ��_� .� .�. . . � ^ - � . � rs , . Y` � . - � . . � , - ,,� . ` - .. ,. - ` , , _ , .. . . - . . , - . - - ��u��,��..��; L/G�fT/J�lG. ' .: - '-'. - - e ' • ; ._, . . , . , _ . . , , , .�_, � '} - .. - _. • - , ; . • - , - - . , _ - . , • ��' � ' -' - � : _ . . , . . - . - , - _ -- � , . � , � • r, ' ' =�� ,�, � : � - . - - . _ ._ . . „ .. . • • � , ' _ sX, � =-- - "- -f it: � -�e�-.�:r;.:::;y.;= :c -;„� - _ _ ' ��i� - . . - _ . ,t� . . -- _ . s�f. - . ,, - r _ . v>',. ::':.. - _ ,�.;f'' ,�-. �,�> ,;-C:'�y:� . . _ , _ . , - - . - �`� `., . - . . . » . - - � . . '� - : � . _ � .. . � , � .. ' .. , .� � t't'' .. , . -. , . _.- . -.. -. . . �> e . ..rJr,- ,. _ ..- _ . F>.-.. . _ � � a S 0 } -- / , ._. _... P l ) Y �(� ; . , d�sJ �_ q ` ,:.,' . ;�, ., ;.',:•';;:� , r,;, - , � •°' J , r ao:a.`xc��.M1�.a...r..- _....,„ � /% /pt '`:°' ;"1;•�;ti�',.,'' -:N.• ,. 4 . -- — 3"2�a+ ' , �.i7. . , • ,,, .�,�•'�t5��^,.'<`n. �,a., � O I ..r.a -,.;;, ;d "� �. ;,. , ' '.��5� +•,.;.1: �.• ,: y r<. , i. ' : ,r; • .. %, [�; � r. �.�Sf%. � P=� � . '�`�''; • � � , rp( �. ':�i'i•�~ � a. •. �i .'�'ire' k , �ii �. �� ,��.�'si )��.r ' � � ,�t/:�("ri%i��'ii.�ii�'� . <,i• It '�L'`iY�` t)=:'�ti�1 �r:.1 �t}i��. � . . ; `n ^ .j+.�f ..'.r . �." '�r �qi{� ��.��t��T 1 �. • �:.� ' " . r y t � ;,,y'��•..t*��,>� j 't�'' ' '1✓i."��,.�^ `{i, r.�r �•a�ea ,� j. . , SyR. 5'si16 � '; `':;R�� '. � �4'?�_'R � � ,f;S�: �t tr��y' k,.,:,Sis',.ti,•.,,�, J4: - . . • • �ti _ . > �t,:.��ti'�:i�•'.,� . ,' _ �'ry�. ,� y'• ��:{'`• � .,:d ; ,� ;;+:�. . � ,.� �i?�; )k'. ;{,;%:} i, ,,,,� �is.r• •'�` 2/ ••s.: yr,.W� i � : .,i�f�'. �N's.;�', 's � ... J.•. . j. �. ,}ti. . . , "' i � ' a. � f,' �ui�Y+t %. p E . /�� . �n....: _ , iC'• " �;�, + ...�^A„�; �w,-, �,4<. ., E i � • _ . : . ``�, r �� ; .� ss. , w ,. ' .. '} g . .t`: :> • ' • �:: ., .. .� ti.Y�'+ '' .�` '•' ' .. � 1— — ' . . ' v ' :" .�_,'�r;•� ,�;; 44�� o � � 1=9�i6� . . ?- �. :y'+:,. r.1..;:;�;;�-r.� . ' er�v � � � V � ' ' . . , x:�•• '-�:`• --' � . . + 'S . . r;� ', �Yr i,� . ,� � • , • , , s,,.��''.i .X�Y, � ' �-� . � ,`' . � _ _ — I P , � , , . � ri,`.� ; '";� .< .� �a,-.. �..;.�.�c.�� . : � — — — — — — — — — — — — �. .. . � ,r•'c. y :`a �'f',yµ�y'ii'? ;.,�;�`��'.. �. . %/� Q7. . �4 iNKWHCEX S-i�L�. POtYCHQO'NiA �� /j2` � '. .-, .. . :�?Yi � ��:„ ".�'•.iAi:�`� � �:;•�? :�R• �'S/i,�—'� SY"R/P GiMENTiO To TQoI'BOTTdNF3M.t�t /� '�'�[•,�, .iy, ;f�': � , .Y'A ( Y,, . � •' � .��{1��: , � , '>: %�, ,� '.;> � ,�;;�� • ''�' w ' ----..�_.__._ �-ov • :�. . ; :., ° :..., y; �:�.. .� �:.,, �t,+,�,,.• -- -- — r'z'.:. ,�t, .�. �,�. ,,:tw '�5.":''- ;;i�•3- +'�,��- � -- ,,. .j-r,c,_ z v , .Y. ;� • �},�;3. �i. _ _.,_. _. .. _._�___.__.. __..._ _ __._ _. .__. �'''w; �r:�•n�'':.:;;_.::';'c bd,i�."d' . f�;�� .� �'�:: ';iw.;`' .�� '�.^ G L:�`r.�':'� �.�pi't ��rt�.• , . ' �' ' ' •'�� ' .• Vt.. �]..�� 'S�.% '�. I 1 ��y� �.�:.. �.. �tir. ;� ;.�, '�� a� ``�� '��'.. .=..1. n, , ,�.,-�;ti. ; ,• .r `•y , �;;,.. . . . �'�'•" i. � s " .a -�" yd:'� . ..'i:: •'..' 7iJL.�r'kn•r .�;�,t;,, ' . �i;5;; L'� X'§:� ;�Y 7t =":e :'ra`•,,�.�. . . �. ;7, �. . yr; Fn��(' j��''i :;-y..� • ^ � � �; �r' 1_�� Y{' '. ' P : ?,L�1�•'.L., . . . . ii.'D�y* . .. �:!� ' ,.g,;;rb.: ', .'�' , ..r � ;r• ;'j,j�„ .�' r�'4.• •i"`.,'�'P::� \1'.."'", � ,d.. . :i=. u�i��,S �,4 ,,y� �F�:T'..,:i ' �D,� IC � . -�� ,�v - ' Py y ` f ' • j+.%1i��y�,;ti . � � ..,' k :� P�P i �� 1' � �� '�'�� j''F ' . . , `�, � . .i. '� y:,:;;'F: 0; ' ,��t�,! '%'Y� H;Y; ' i�:f.s ':.�r:.',�i�V ,��' (�' . •,af.�i,'!C:u,�'� �i..•�'/'1! •p'`,^ •�•�:•!^ � �� , 1 I ! • r��';¢ • .:G'" 'r � �1;'S:. 'f.'�r�'.'`, 7 . ��.. ,� ':�- �.�; . :�k;!fw + .z"� ..,, , '. � � , ' '�';�r1 . �r>�^ A YT��?5 w;�•F�:-e r I I •;' j �'x °`.ti.` ;.4 ' :f.;. ,Q� e , � � . ',7,� ,•Y ' T�x��, :p .•.i` • � - • .�;,i'.', �! �� c' #c: ' � Q , �•i�'•e. . . . � � ' ;�rJ �it n��' �.. � �C,•.�. ,�:iK,. � " ' ,+'ry' ;::P::��":� �;�:;�9 : ,: . . � / G,� f S / G � � � . .� �}�� :: : .;�::,.. �: (, f _;��,..' ±�''ya� , ��! !.' '"F 4 ' • ;�: \A . 3; . . ' I � i •�J��:i t � ' o;'rl ,l{� .;.�� ` �I �'"."� ' .. �I l � � ; ' i :r,' �. � :�y�,';'ry; ' �:'• � ' ,. '�' ! � . . � ."'.: '•:' �,. '_ :i..V .T.. �•ji�� r�: ..r � ] • , ,-> �4=- , . �� ,,�- � .i ... : �_ � b.iitrr� ' ':v"i�i�t�� r�t,;�'r1!T _ . , . . , '� '� �.r�:_Q I , '� 4 ,�S.a`'i'> , i J�. • ' ,^ �y�i �� .,.;`�... � . . , ^ ,,f^.„ •:.�' ''��:•i'i , � , , t`` ;a.-�s v. �;. . . , . ?�✓:, J.�b?'�. �y' ,�;. ::, -��' . .. •'�z; ., >�.; �•}'• " nY.'ti, �•k�� •.f' .:af. �,�(vY �' 't. ��iy.Tr � . '�n��.��;fRy . . '� � � .. %•y{�, ' � � , 'Sj,�`. � � � }r�.•^.1�"Y:,,„ '.i . . ' „�. 7 �.--:� . ''. `. . �'� r;?f : � ', �, �; :>, , . , • . i. .. ��. :' 'T �.;� f:, � �� :�: . � ,:::: ; : ..::. �..A. � . � 1 . . , �;�::��; r�:��; .� �:,. . .. � . �,�;;;Y`,`,= l�' .__..._ __. . . :^�: t�+:.:'�' . . .,, =' �;* ' . �, �i.r;. . _ ; . . �y�_Q �� . . . ;. �•. •j.�n - ' ut: •'�?:'.... �.•:...�4,�_� ' . ��', +i �F ,�li.�.� .r � " � U . �'�� ' :'� '�j�.y'�'- . . ��,;t, ��"-`; ;.� ' � '.ArF'�';��•��<'�.v.t�y�`�c�� . •� ^r��;' ��;r'•i� . y', ,IY�•o .. . . i•. ' . . _ .t. d.��;?"ei . ; .. 1'. :_ ' ' : ' ?'.`Y? : ii�i; �� •' � . . ;�-;�,i fy�+. •,F.i,Y;•�Ji ,•F � , :� 'I�^. ,;j��,x i'� r i'� • �4p�'.�'I:;�': e :;�,.�`,�•" fs , • � `'�. ' �' � _ +�a �'.�. .A 1�Yw V1.�� :'� �..A.1�. ,,: ' i . '� � . i• .. .` �?n�!.5�,. e:o. ;r. t , , . � . ,��.�r: _ .�y 'r�v��1,f� � '.' w�i 'z d, .. J ' ``, � � ,. k?',��, ; �,..f:�;'";�,•., �, �?' . . • ,., c��f.� ;, � � t . j. ;,4;r�' , " . ' • • =,," ::• . .t, • ; '" .�[y ,� �dF. � . " . � . � s . ..LIj��;,CN.. �.+.�µ, ,:F ., TM��n� q�' , �'{;;�i°'.�4:C'3 `'' . . �;;�,t ' ' ' �z',�r;,•�;. '' `;*�'�,;,, . . - � �; ; i •�� : :.: � . ':'' 'r�i'�J . V ��YZIi `��6p`�''�.• ' ' , ^4if '. � ~ l��t' �ry�y�p'1;�•.t��' t�4 �'`� ��' .i ' • y. �. . �y�.L,� '•�''M� , � . � �'�I�y,�!"1).' (� i�.'�:��y�,�, r � i "��. i'A.. �� ' .t . . f�!r�j •�.t'.ti{�. i . ,.. .' YS�a�' `. '+CF`Y� � " 5 . �,r �,�•��' . .�;�� t`�r� . . � ., r:�:$' •..n ''�,, ��, ,�;� . , , ! �^M ` . r ' , , .ti':k't'y;r � "?;,' . . . "`4' ' . �'? �';':''. �,• ''.i• . . , � ::.:, � .. ". 4. `,r�\� ' t.., %,'ij�. � — � �, ..� ��,� y � �i s�i � �t`� �: � �. �� '� � . � `�; i � . , .tZ'fy,.iY�:i.\+.r`: . • . � !f, � n ��JxF1' "� a?�T)�+��.T.. •.� (� N `N° � �,l. ('�4 � � .i • ,•'rJ w, '+�.�'�{,1�u�f�� .f. Y�.z`� .., .. . \ , ' �A• "'• � • �+ �� r � ;�,��JM1' •1!� �'��r>1 ' ' . J t.. ��\,". ` � ��ti�,� �4 ��.'_ � � : . .v.� i . _ . ' ' '<�, .:H" .:fT��`.,r�:�. . . . ' . ' .��.� ' . . . rir� ' Sp`i: , . r;: ' • J`. ' . . • i.1-µ�� t�'� , � '� ' ' . �'S ''i(Y; X 1 � ,."5.'''' �.''.. + • . . • • .�� , '. � � � . �,'�°'; ��?:- .i�y�: 'r,: � . n 'ti:� . A•�`�'� �•�;��' ' • . z�� '' �fi�_C��.:'��'.t.� .:"�` ,.�...� .. ' , � �,�.. ,��,' ^ p',•y; �; .. , ' .Y',1�•�'.ip:'.,'in�y,J . :;t a^ ` sy •!•k�:". f � ; '�° a - , "•F �t�G�i'�,� y �•`.S.�N',�.��'�'•. ,. ,,( , . . a:�: i•:s`�F •�r:.� �. � t.�,,,;;.. '• �t.. t` i ��?' t?", : i . . . `'^:5, .�{,.:y;Uk},;•yS' t.' :a"`•�• " ;'x .' � iNS�"'Si�}' S.^ . � _ `:�r xr,.,�. ._ ��: , • F.r�Pi."' ' , . r , . 'd',' . t � a'„"e�n. e ' . , ;r.::�'jf�'.'l��sa;''t::'1�:^ , ' � '' �v:.��,.,i! . ^q�" .v'" . . ri� r . • , r�:?.L:.'.� � " ,.� �'-' �'•L . ' . ,, y�•. - ' �: ;�,y ��,�'' .. � ,� . ��6.'.:,�r'. l.. • ':S >" . E.�'��'��.{ � � 7 .i"'� • , iy,.. ^, . • ;,'�{�;'� ` ' "`%``11��1..�i1�� I : `• � .rr � • ��•ti..r...�.�aa.. . � . . � �;� .'Y''n ' ' t..1.:1 �rp ' �� V � ��I�l\\1l \�11,1 --1�11 r 111 .. ��'�( . ' • •'�e; . t.,� 1..:�';Y . ��i1:� � S.4'�•,. ' r �;, �'r�.v'. � � ','''f :�!. � � , i�i� ', � ^� �`�-•�s: � '�r��`�f u �' � 1 Z i r`c?•. ' . � � � � ��J" '�':: . �• 1�'•�,j „ ,�: ��5 �FL � �r,:x J; . � �..+r. . , . � '�V , ,.� ' � ,. : ti , m "' r_z -_ • ` � ' _ . "_ ' ' ... . ., �.-. �w ..w• , . �-.«- -� �.� -...�..r-+� -_ .., . --.a..` . . �.....� r 5 0 , ` � - �/� ��cFi� �� - ----- ---- - ---- -----�— July 29, 198?_ �� %�� 4Pe, the undersigned, own and live on property adjacent to the r. ar or side lot lines of 1047 Marie AverYue. we are aware of the pool eing installed on Gehrz's property. We have been fully advised that the water's . edge of the pool does not comply with City of &Tendota Heights o dinance No. 503, Section 5.2 (a) requiring pool location 30' from the r�ar lot line. We do not object to the variance being sou�ht by the that the pool can be completed in its present location. . -�ar�� '�� " s . ' % \ . �• � /' // . �7 .7 ' � � ' / �� = � � ��-�--� �.��.. :% • • �� ..�. . 7 ( � 041 Marie A� � ( 1051 Niarie Ave�ue ) � ( 10.4� Overlook `�`� (10�6 Overlook � Q V�h�-00 k �Q0r4 D I I � � /05'O I !O`�� ' I I I N.I — — -�--��.7I I. _ OF ' 98.T7 �5.T7 93.T7 9 � � � A� � 4 . � � � � ��b5 � N N ��"'{� ��M 'O � ��M � M � � ( n � � O � o QI � m o� 4 0� o� o� � • o 0 17,165.34 c.f. � 17,165.34 s.f. � , sQ� ��,�s�.34 Sq.� g L 0 CK Z i Z �7, �s j 95.69 95.� 9 93.70 : — — --8� .8g — — — � ' MARkE AVE. I so ) ) top o� -�'olia9c +�p �r- h,rr h�.i9r►+ cf wa i 1 gra�,i,nd(. I e�e I (�,/0.ter Sur-face IeVeI� � CRAWFORD & ANDERSON ROLLIN H. CRAWFQRD PftOPESS{dNAL ASSOClA710N LAUREt10E A. ANOER54N ATTClRNEYS AT UlW BARRY W. MCKEE SUITE 21 t, WEN7WORTH OFFICE CENTER JAMES A. WEItNER 33 EAST WENTWOR7H AVENUE pONALD L. HOEFf WEST ST. PAUL, MN 531 1'0 (6l2) 4D7-'SBeI TE�8Xo 248-651 July 29, 1982 The Honorable Mayor Robert Lockwood and City Council Members ci.ty xall 750 So. Plaza Drive , , ,Mendota Iigts. � MN 55iI8 Re: Sanitary Sewer Availability to Kavanagh and Dawson's Suburban Acre Lots Fionorable Mayar Lockwood and City Council Members: This office represents the owners af the property a� northwe�t quadrant of �he propased 35W ancl Mendota Height on the southerly end a� Rogers Lake. They have this week vered to their amazement and harror that �he construc�ion currently underway will deprive them of the access to the rnunicipal sanitary sewer,which they have had on the west property for some time. This has occurred in spite o� re assurances over�the years �hat such access would be canti after such construction. ; Needless to say, the 1.oss of access to the sanitary � this parcel of prime land results in a significant reduct: : value ta their property and consti�utes damages for which' ' have nat been compensated. Wha.le the owners of this prope . the Bisanz �amily, have been cooperative with every munica • in.which they have operated over the past thirty-�ive yeaY �-=�-�*��`��obva.ously �'cannat tolerate such a diminution in value to t� : .,,.�;��,ti.s�:. • ,�-�.:.. .., �.'property; wi�hout compensation ar, in the alternative, a . : '�':;'restora�ian of sewer availability. � We have been told tha� one of the first �teps in dete ` a saiution to this problem is �o complete a feasibili�y si of relative costs of the various methods of providing sewE �' this property. We hereby request �hat the Council. imrnedia : authorize such a study. The urgency af this matter is re: the f act that unless the sewer line is constructed under 1 posed freeway 35W before the paving work is done, tha� opi ;� �L'` .,, , �� 2 � ,g8�. SED CQUNSEL 7 E. $TASSHN D A. BMERICK the Raad disco- of 3 5W f �heir eated ued ewer to on in they rty, pality s, they eir rmining udy r to tely atec3 ta he pro- ion may The Honorable Mayor Robert Lockwood and City Council Members Page 2 July 29, 1982 ' be precluded. The cost and difficult.y of the extension of sewer from another direction may be disasterous to these property owners and increase the damages to their land. Please give this matter your immediate attention. Very truly yours, CRAWFORD & ANDERSON ' PROF SIONAL ASSOCIATION � �� . C�� • Rollin H. Crawford RHC:mkd ::1; ; , �,� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTIQN N0. 82-- � RESOLUTION COMMENDING KATHLEEN SWANSON FOR HER DEDICATION AND AT TNMENT OF CERTIFTCATZON FROM THE MUNICIPAL CLERK'S AND FINANCE OFFICER' ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, Kathleen M. Swanson has been emgloyed by the Gity of since May, 1972; and WHEREAS, she has served as City Clerk since Januarq, 1978; and WHEREAS, her dedication and prafessional drive prompted her to Municipal Clerks and Finance Off icers training pragram; and ata Heights 011 in the WHEREAS, aver a period of three years she successfully completed uch training and has attained a Cer�ificate from the Muni.cipal Clerks and Finance ificers Association, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by �he City Council this 3rd day of ugust, 1982, that the City Council hereby expresses its appreciation and commends athleen Swansan for her dedication and community serva.ce and particularlp for her attain- ment of this Certificate. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights thi.s 3rd dajy of August, 1982. ( CITY COUNCIL CITY dF MENDOTA By Robert G. Lockwood Mayor ATTEST: Orvil J . JaYtnson City Administratar ' 4j CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO T0: City Council August 3, 1982 FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy and Orvil J. Johnson SUBJECT: Permanent street assessment policy Over the years, it has been the City policy to assess to tlie pro approximately 100% of the costs of all public improvements. As this streets, it has meant a generally acceptable type of construction, w gutters in most areas. It must be understood also, that if curb and installed, a satisfactory design of surface water disposal must be i Many older streets were replaced in the course of utility improve "as was" condition, without rebuilding the base of the street, or imp drainage. An exampTe of this type of replacement wouTd be the Ivy Fa Addition and the Chippewa-Hiawatha area. The cost of street.restorat considered a portion of the utility cost, and was assessed over�the 1 utility assessments. rty owners efers to h curli and utters are orporated. ents in an oving the ls First on was fe of the Straight street improvements have been based on a 10 year assessm nt period, acknowledging that some future rebuilding could occur, resultin�g in a new assessment. We have now had several areas where initially permanent streets w re installed, such as Ivy Falls East and Ivy Falls Second, where construction, some 16 years ago, is still in excellent condition and should provide another 10 to 15 year of service without rebuilding or overTayment. For the past several years, the City has been wrestling with the ilema between assessing 100% for good, permanent streets and the need for good, per anent streets in areas where street base and street surfacing was less than permane t. In 1980, the City staff studied and the City Council.spent a eonsiderable amou t of time discussing improving streets and drainage in the Ivy Falls First Addi ion. The project was deferred because the residents were not of a mind to "buy" a good permanent street the associated drainage improvements. This same concept applies to t e Chippewa- Hiawatha area, acknowledging that City off icials have not had as much face-to-face dialogue with the residents as occurred in the Ivy Falls First Additi n. Is it unreasonable to charge or assess older homes for a new stre t and' drainage system? We levy these improvement costs onto newly developed areas b cause it is merely a part of the total improvement. It would appear that the reb ilding of streets in existing residential areas may take more the form of, or c mpare to: a) a large expenditure to put on a new roof on your house, or b) a complete residing job in order to bring the investment up t current standards. If it is the concensus thatolder homes should have some type of incen ive or subsidy for repTacement facilities, then the City Council should face up to a change in policy or at least an amendment to the hard and fast 100%. If the City is to participate in the rebuilidng of existing streets, then comes t e question: August 3, 1982 Page Two At what level of participation or subsidy? It may be that now is the time to consider a change in policy and some assessment criteria to accompany the change. Under Chapter 429 of the Improvement Code, we can undertake a project so long as 20% of the cost is assessed. Bonds may be issued for the entire cost or even in excess under certain conditions. Any bond issue that is only partially assessed obviously has to be made up through a special debt service levy. It may be that a "replacement fund" should be established in order to finance future subsidies for street improvements. This could be accomplished by "over-financing" and possibly collecting a debt service levy somewhat in excess of that needed. Through these two measures, we could graduaTly begin to establish a fund for future City participation for street improvements. The criteria for participation should include at least the following elements: a) Permanent (bituminous surfacing only) street reconstruction should have approximately 50% City participation. City participation should not apply or be considered in those areas where permanent street construction has not been assessed. Street restoration costs which were part of the cost of utility improvements should not be considered as "permanent" street improve- ments. (If a permanent street, including drainage improvements had been constructed, it would have been assessed as a permanent improvement). b) If past drainage improvements have not been assessed, then 100% of the storm sewer collection system should be assessed. As part of the collection system, curb and gutters are as integral a part of the collection system as are the underground pipes and catch basins. c) If any amount of "trunk line" drainage pipe is needed, then at least 50% of such trunk line should be considered as a City participation or general obligation. Justif ication for benefits, and legal tests, would be much more defensible if local collection is assessed 100%, and trunk lines are considered and paid for as a general City obligation. The attached resolution attempts to put the foregoing thoughts and concept into a policy statement. It is submitted for your consideration, discussion and certainly subject to change and "f ine-tuning". CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION N0. 82- PROPOSED RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING POLICY FOR ASSESSING COST OF STREET RE-CONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights has established a policy of � permanent streets, including concrete curb & gutter and storm sewer ii development areas, and assessing the cost of such street improvements against the benef itting property; and :onstructing i new 100% WHEREAS, street surfacing and drainage improvements in the older reas of the community were constructed to less than permanent standards in ye rs past; and WHEREAS, in a number of cases the street surface was actually con tructed as "street restoration", a direct result of underground' utility construc ion; and WHEREAS, such street restoration did not include permanent draina e improvements, curb and gutter or other characteristics of a permanent street; and WHEREAS, it is the policy of the Mendota Heights City Council tha all properties sfiould be assessed for permanent street improvements and drainage imp ovements, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council thi:s day of August, 1982, that the policy for reconstruction of non-permanent streets is hereby stablished; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City will participate up to 50% o the cost of reconstructing the bituminous surface of any existing permanent stree needing reconstruction; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any street improvements deemed necess ry on a street that has not been constructed to permanent standards.or assess d for permanent. improvements be therefore assessed at the 100% rate; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any needed storm sewer collection syst�em be assessed at 100% of cost; and ; I BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approximately 50% of any storm sewer t unk line improvement cost associated with street reconstruction sfiould be absor ed as a general obligation; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that f inancing of permanent street improve nts be structured to establf.sfi a fund which would allow City cost participati n for re- construction of permanent streets. Adopted by the City Council this ATTEST: .._�t� ___ •.� e........r�n ('itv l'lark day of August, 1982. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHT By Robert G. Lockwood, ayor �: � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 29, 1982 T0: City Council ; FROM: Edward F. Kishel � City Engineer SUBJECT: Burow Pond - Rolling Green I In the matter of the Burow Pond, an incident has occurred dur'ng the past several days which we believe should be brought to the attent'on of the City Council and others. It seems that this past week-end, Mr. Burow, the Owner, has p mped all of the water out of the pond through the overflow pipe into the Ma ie Avenue pond where it was lifted into Valley Creek. Starting early Monday morning, Staff received several telepho � calls with respect to this operation. Most were ecological in nature co cerning the wild life, possible damage to vegetation, and appearance. It robably was also fear of the unknown. After lunch on Monday, July 27th I discussed the matter with hief of Police, Dennis Delmont, mostly to determine if a citation was in o der. Because Jim Danielson is on military leave this week, I also conta ted Sherm Winthrop for legal advise. Sherm suggested that we order him to c ase pumping or be cited. This was not done pending further investigat on. We reviewed the wetlands ordinance and the easement agreementlfor establishing the pond as part of the Rolling Green plat. The wetlands ordinance permits the removal of not more than 1 0 cubic yards of materials. It has other limitations but, in our opinion, none effected Mr. Burow's operation. There is nothing in the ordinance that covers removal of water, unless one reads between the lines. Dennis met with Mr. Burow Monday afternoon and learned that i his (Burow's) intention to remove dried silt in an amount less than 10 cubic yards, to fill a low spot behind his barn, one that becomes soggy fter each rainfall. Mr. Burow maintained that he had a letter permitting hi to do so, but Dennis did not see the letter. Without a date, we looked hrough the files but found nothing. Tuesday morning I received a phone call from a Mrs. Roszak, 9 8 Stratford Court, who asked about the operation, and indicated that by that t me, Mr. Burow had the pond pumped down to mud. She called it "dry". With Jim gone, we were not certain whether a verbal approval o move dirt had been given. We finally got Jim on Tuesday afternoon and iscussed the situation. Jim recalled that at the time we obtained the drai age ease- ment in March 1980,there may have been some mention of dirt movemer.�. Because a lot of what had gone on for two days was heresay, first Dennis and I agreed, and then Jim and I discussed the matter further Tuesday evening and agreed, that I should meet with Mr. Burow to obtain first hand informa- tion because it was rumored that a number of Rolling Green residents might appear at the next Council meeting. Wednesday morning, Dennis and I met with Mr. Burow to determine what he intended to do. We explained conditions of the wetlands ordinance and the easement he signed for the establishment of the pond. He explained that he wanted to move about 60 cubic yards of silt from the pond area to a low spot back of his barn and that he had permission to do so. He showed us a copy of a letter from Sherm, dated April 2, 1980, to Don Christenson, Burow's attorney, indicating that the City Engineer concurred that the movement of 60 cubic yards within the ponding easement was acceptable. That struck a bell, and further research revealed that as part of the agreement to sign the pond easement, Mr. Burow was told he could move 60 cubic yards from the pond to the low spot in question. He maintains that he was only conforming with that permission even if it was 2 years later. At this time, it is our judgement that he is conforming with regulations except for the fact that he did not first notify the City of his intentions. We are not certain as to how to deal with the pumping the pond dry. It is possible that representatives of the neighborhood will be at the next Council meeting and it is possible that Mr. Burow will also be there. It appears that it may take a week or so, without rain, for the silt to dry sufficiently for Mr. Burow to remove same by his method of operation. Should rain come, he will be stalled again. The removal of the silt from the bottom of the pond will not harm the City's interest in the pond. In fact, it will help delay the need for the City to clean the pond. Some concern has been rendered that excavating might break a seal in the bottom of the pond thus permitting it to dry up permanently. We are not cer- tain that there is such a seal, and this is not likely to take place because there are 2 to 3 feet of silt and Mr. Burow intends to remove only the top 4 to 6 inches. It appears that the silt moving operation will improve the pond depth and will improve Mr. Burow's back yard. Without further comment, we leave the matter for possible discussion at the next Council meeting. � � , _____.________- M---�.. �1._D_0 `r _f� _. -- - k�--� I � 1� � � . �� . � __.�._� � T�� : �_._� _.._��C ��` U;5 .��. � 0=R`�------ ------. -V --.---- -- _ _�P��l� � �. �.� � � �.-� � � � - - ��- �. �� ---..__.l �_ ___ �i--g -��r � � - .. . ��.��. �-v��-�� -- ---1_� � ,. __$-1- � - - - -! "-'�-�?-- �?-= � ►1 L_t`�'`� ��ot�.Yih�.�'ot2�j��.S1, `�"ca �#� 1:.. � /�, Co M.� •-- . __2�� °° �� ri�� 3 y��- � 1�40 � r�JG C-0M 1..�'�' G.1,� . -%r t-. i... U�(J�. � i2.0 Un..) (� �C�DYZIL 22�a�xi "� �I, o a �-a� � n� ��.s ��, �� } �-o�.p �.� ,. ��.� , � �� r�.� C�� G� . (,� rZ.�-r�� c�fi-r�-r�r ►z. rt� � �.o� ,��._sS� �� - -- - -- -- _ _.___ _____ 4g9 a 8 �: z.S . _.. �� ,� � . � �2.0� �-� C..�,r.,ti � �..�� ov �hlJ P M AYi+K- �'� C , .o � Y , �oo _� .� �� .� .,� _-- . � 8 �, 7 � � � ad , a a � � � �s� r� � -- ��...�..-�,� � Z� c�� l _ _t ,�Z 4u� ""'".. _ _�_�_��, �-4�`� __ �� .c�c.k� �#►,� , `��,J . � M� $.�_Z � _ Qt�.� — W w� 3 5 �. �J,�--�i� gSt i..3� 5 ----�- - -- _ $_ Z�� 2 N1 p, l�;z:a � t„� �-��.:.i �-t � �" ______._ _._---_� _ _. . .----- , � I�r� � rz�. s S . k��uh � � 6.,�, W U v2.. K. '�..'�c.�- �"T' '�AV +� . l'a �ar�� l..Fr..�'�X-.p, C 2� CpG 2� 1 c� Z, a�� _. "��,�.,. �,�',� �.��__ t� � ��.. � 1`� ��p I� A ��s`�'. ��:n�s�"� -- , �^ � ��G �1 �...L.. "7tE�1Lt Z�J~�� {C. i3t2114� � . �tf-l.. c�- �h�� }.�� "i t'2-t 1.�i . ._ _. . _"„ — a_ __ �....� i �1 I' j' -- --- -._. _..__.�._ -- - � -------�- ----- - k --------�n o , a �o _ 1 __ - -i,t1 ar2,..K- �� ___ _ �'i-'�_� �o �. _. �,�'�� ,Z �1 t� � t �c� � � ��_�-�_. _w. ►°� a � ��n�r c-� , - - � - --- -__ _ _ ----- ------- -�-- - - - r-- ��-�. i�.� --- r�,�t�.UCz.S� "._S _ . �u _ . --�-c�s M � '�o� ,l �" _. ..._ �{ c_ � �..a I.��p � a o�f"`_' � � �� G� �V 1 � 1� � �U /�`'��.IZ... Ve ! • ----- -- - - - -- - -- - - -. ___._ __-- __ __.. -�' - - � - � - --� - - - -- ----�-----_�.- -- � - .__...---- - --- --- - � -_. .. �. ___ __-� - - -_ ..— __� __�__-- - '-."' ,. _ _ � ,� } i u� o ��rL� �� J � � �i�..�-�.1 s '� �a'�r c. S, -- - --?�o__-�-'�► �?� � � - - _ .. .. _---_. - - , . t � ...._.. . , , _ _t- _ �'i"1. .,, � `�u �St�-6� � �G..�1 t1 _ �ZD�'.1_� �_.,��.._._ c�{2_.__ _ ._._- -- �..� �3i�o u.a r�1 C:.�2 , � � �, � Q 0 z N ► t �✓ � � � � � � r V � W k � � � Q � '; � :� . : �"p �r M N � �J /V� m y < i � •f 0 �nr T aJ � K �� r ' r O - M i J Y• 4 x .v ys � , -__. __. '� .. �\ / / , f � p � . � \ � { � -- l , �, . '� ` + . , . , �C. � � � . Y'� . .. . �o . — c-• � � . S�Op Q • 1 . . _. .. , � N� 1 . � �" . .. . � sa , ° - - —T — -- •, ! " 1' . V � •r . �+,, ! • • � I /F) +Y� ' . lU � ss � � � � .. I � ; '{ , ' ., __ '_. _ _ _ Sf / � %� : � '_ 1`Y . ! . _ �s i �. \I I e � � �. � � i1 _• / / � .. Oi ___ __ ' � •� J: �•�Sf: I 7g �. __._ ._ - ;•- �i i ir,% � � ` . oM1 � _ , �� O• n i �. ; . .•�� r .. � . �`A . s., � ', _ ' '—" "-- Y s : �� Y� . � J -t �� Ay . �. . r ,�� $g . •� _ , ' p Nlf — .� r '. 2, '.,.. M.i i. 1- / i . � __ _ _ • P � a �� 1 Yw • ,... �a r•. / . . - �i! w gi � e�+ : . _ r � . �f f3 ` .� . , 9,t�,opk" ;•y� � . �Y . _ ori � eo � :t ;_,' _ ��.,, — -- -_ n s � ,� _ , ..�y .". i -- �•+ rg , . _' �, E . .�F p � �.. _ �,(� / . � • p.t � �;u.. •i° � ' �.a I • �.1� �% n � ^ �� I � ,_ u '! ♦ 'd i�l •• � - ; i N f� '��. 4 /i M d y • ^ 'I , ' ' -. � 1� � �-_. i ' - . n�a.. � i Y � Y - ` i .. _. ; ..� �� .'t:�:;..a � . . ♦ <� �'8:�,.. � ' �- -__` ' , ,I `.-- �i� � ' . �• Ro 3q�-N _� �� r � pfj♦� • f3 ��'. ak . , S.9<s � �2y� / 4, ,� W. � a • i � EBf.y �, / � � • t :C �� i 'z'° �si +� ' -'- .,- �� /, �� 4L �'\ j / a'�.`.�: 6 �f. r: i �. ' i �,� .. r _ __ _ . __ � Z � Z I.L• W W Z z �J.� � � a �e r� . 0 Co�� ,� �__. _. ; �. Z .! U L- �{ !, � B Yc�4- �.'�Jt7'x•Ht� r�eh t�! �.r� � ��i �c+�� ,� i-+r�- � on�. r,rµ-�a� � , ,� ;:..tr�,� 8 %� �: ``� A`✓ A N NA S/E�'%,:'- �� -�i , -.I11J� G- I`r� C�1C' Cz4 � 1+, �•.c-,�f,.��,,��i � ec� �ox �a4 �+��fi ,r�N� ��;:��