The URL can be used to link to this page

1982-10-05CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY,MINNESOTA AGENDA October 5, 1982 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 0 3. Approval of Minutes: August 3rd, September 7th and September 21 4. Consent Calendar: a. Approval of the List of Claims. b. Approval of the List of Licenses. c. Acknowledgement of the monthly Code Enforcement Officer report d. Acknowledgement of the NDC4 minutes from September 15 and 29, for September 29 and October 6. e. Acknowledgement of the September 28th Planning Commission minu f. Appointment of George Lowe to Volunteer Fire Department. End of Consent Calendar. 5. HEARING - 8:00 P.M. a. Case #82-13, Colon, Application for Conditional Use Permit for Unit Development. (See attached Notice of Hearing. Planning � recommends denial) . 6. Old Business: a. Memo from Code Enforcement Officer and Request from Lanvesco permit request. b. Resolution from Mn/FSL on tax abatement for replat of Delaware c. Memo from Police Chief on Hunting and Trapping Complaints. d. Memo from Code Enforcement Officer on accessory structure at 2 7. Commission Reports. a. Case #82-21, Stanton, Application for Variance. (Recommend ap b. CAO Case #82-03, Stanton, �lpplication for Modified Site Plan . (Recommend approval) . .� 8. Communications. a. Letter from St. Thomas Academy regarding accessory structure. b. Action Alert from League of Minnesota Cities on change in c. Request from Russell Wahl for Halloween Bonfire. agendas s. Planned ommission �r builcling Crossing. )78 Theresa. �roval) . ►pproval. guidelines. � October 5, 1982 Council Agenda , � 9. New Business: �' Public Mayor City Administrator Page Two a. Memo and discussion on 1983 levy and budget. (Continued from b. Memo and Resolution on Dakota County State Bank anniversary. C, ,�1� ��o /�m usi ��o r�-!g'e r/y f/�il/ o v T t S�e.� .'r�� r f. Council Members q��t ahjr ��deas �/' �'rl� ��i`��Z� ?� e, G u i�r'e /�`<� es -�qh d Us�/�: r�ra ft Nmi;s e h City Attorney ��h� ��B�i/i��/ /Je.�o 7"m f:/� f�/s�ey f�'/�i1�.L �: �1�0/ � r� Co u � f/fsfrn f��'r��a ,�f��/L/�OD a. Report and recommendation on Fire Station Architectural Contrac� on Tuesday). City Engineer . Public Works Director a. Memo on Wagon Wheel Trail activity. City Clerk • -ti. a. List of Judges for November 2 General Election. b. Memo on Manufactured Housing provision. (See attached Planner'; proposed Ordinance amendments). � �. . .� ' /� / � � / �, ` . � / � � . � .� � -� ! �/ , , � ; ,� . / �/' �, "' f� / / i ' � � ,- / � , � ,i��/ � , ,� ,, � ,�;,. , �,,,, � r , , �� ,� , � �, � f i i � � �� , i I r � � / / � / / ,/ � � / l�• ��r � G✓/H � —�� .��. . � � �� / �;e� �� . 21) . �ndur��rneriiC' 1 �� 't��-n �r� /!/ov `� � i✓,pavT s,a� � �v7- ��f. o.-r � �T- ; (Oral report memo and e r� — - 9 •� n� 1 Page No. 1680 August 3, 1982 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the Cit City of Mendota Heights was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at the City Hall, Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Acting Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P. following members were present: Acting Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmen H ( and Losleben and Councilwoman Witt. Mayor Lockwood had notified the Co he would be late. � s APPROVAL OF Councilman Losleben moved approval of the minutes MINUTES 6th meeting. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 Abstain: 1, Hartmann Councilman Hartmann moved approval of the minutes 20th meeting. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 . Nays: 0 Abstain: 1, Mertensotto CONSENT CALENDAR Councilman Losleben moved approval of the consent submitted and recommended for approval as part of agenda, along with authorization for execution of documents contained therein: n �Council, 750 South . The il that �f the July the July :alendar as :he regular ill necessary 1. Approval of the List of Claims dated August 3,I1982, and totalling $122,252.04. 2. Acknowledgement of the July Code Enforcement O ficer's monthly report, minutes of the July 27th Planning Comm ssion meeting and minutes of the July 21st NDC4 meeting. 3. Adoption of Resolution No. 82-64, "RESOLUTION'�STABLISHING FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING PROPOSED USE HEARING" 4. Approval of the list of licenses, granting 1 L.W.T. Cement Const. Co. Concrete License Stocker Excavating Excavating Licen Genz-Ryan Plumbing & Htg. Gas Piping Licen Floodmaster Engr. Corp. General Contract Forbes Construction Co. General Contract Hanson Homes, Inc. General Contract� Hass/McNamara Construction General Contract� Dale M. Johnson Engr. & Const.General Contract� Lissick Construction General Contract� Don Miller Const. General Contract� Darryl Thayer & Assoc. General Contract� Swanson Plumbing & Heating Heating & Air Co� Donaho Roofing Roofing License Superior Pool Builders, Inc Swimming Pool In ses to: License License License License License License License License itioning llation Page Na . 1681 �'a August 3, 1982 Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 1982 SEAL COATING The Council acknawledged and di.scussed receipt of tabulation of bids received for the 1982 seal coating project. On the recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Losleben movec3 that the contract for 1982 seal coating be awar8ed to the /' low bidder, Bituzninous Roadways, Inc., for their low bid a� 1 $33,759.04. Councilwaman Witt secanded the motit�n. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Mayor Lockwood arrived at 7:43 a'cZock P.M. HEARING -- CASE Mayor Lackwoad opened the meeting far the purpose of a public #82-i0, BASKFIELD, hearing on an applica�ian from Mr. Brent Baskfield, for a con- CONDITTONAL USE ditional use permit for instal].atian of a fence, along with PERMIT AND consideratian of a request for a variance far fence height. VARIANCE �, Bask�isld, owner of the subject property, 687 Decorah Lane, reviewed his application and proposed p1.an to install a five foot wrought iron fence around his property. He advised that his primary reasons for desiring the fence aare to salvage the remaining portion of useable yard space and to provide additional security. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Mayor Lackwood asked for questions ar cammen�.s from the audience. There bea.ng no questians or comments, Ca'uncilman Hartmann moved that the hearing be closed at 7:58 P.M. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Mayar Lackwood maved appraval af the adaption of Resolution No. 82-641�, "RESOLUTION APi�ROVING MINOR CONDITONAL USE PERMIT," approving the ins�allation of a five foot wraught iron fence in accorclance with the site plan provided by Mr. Baskfie3.d, on the condition that no plantings be permitted in �he �ace af the fence in the front yard, parallel to the £ront of the house, and also 15 feet northerly along the westerly side Io� line, an.d further conditianed that �.he fence be na greater than 36 inches above the grade of Ocala Lane. Counoilman Hartmann seconded the moti.on, Ayes: 5 � Nays: 0 MN/DOT MAINTEN- The Counci2 acknowledged receipt of a letter from District 9 Aating ANCE FACILITY Engineer, Wayne Murphy, requesting Council approval of the issuance of a builcling permit for the Mn/DOT maintenance facility proposed to be sited at 2229 Pilot Knob Road. � Mr. Murphy and Mr. Bob Krueger were present �or the discussion, and reviewed landscaping plans for the Cauncil. The Gpuncil had _ several questions regarding utility extension to �he proposed structure. Public Works Disector Daniel.son advised that the applicants are requestang an extensa.on of sewer and water utiiities _ w,� _.... ..,,,,.. August 3, 1982 to the structure as soon as possible in the sprin of 1983. Engineer Kishel advised the Council that the City could install utilities following the platting as proposed by C'ty Planner Howard Dahlgren. Mr. Danielson advised the Counc'1 that the Metropolitan Airports Commission staff plans to d'scuss the redevelopment of the MAC property at its next sta f ineeting, and that the City staff recommends approval of the is uance of the requested permit at this time. (� Administrator Johnson suggested that the Council rant approval of � the permit conditioned upon receipt of a letter f om the Metropol- itan Airports Commission that the Commission woul give the City any right-of-way necessary to accomplish the exte sion of utilities to the site. ' r'� LJ C After discussion, Councilman Mertensotto moved th approval of the issuance of a building permit for proposed Mn/DOT maintenance facility conditioned upon receipt of right-of-way dedication for utilities and roadways and whatever easements may be necessary to extend utilities to the project site. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 i i CASE #82-07, Dr. Patrick Ballard was present to request Counci BALLARD, SIGN amended variance application to allow installatio VARIANCE at the entrance to the Dakota County State Bank. stated that the proposed sign post would be�five would be set back six feet from the South Plaza D way. In response to Council questions, he stated own the sign and that anyone else in the Bank Bui to use the directional sign may buy into it. Mayor Lockwood moved approval of the requested 24 setback variance to allow installation of a�five si.x feet from the South Plaza Drive right-of-way, that the Council reserves the right to order remo, should Dr Ballard decide to vacate the premises a� Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. ; Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 EAGLE POINT SALES The Council acknowledged receipt of a letter from FACILITY requesting the extension of the permit for a temp facility on the Eagle Ridge property. In his let had requested that the original permi� due to exp 1982, be extended to August l, 1983. As part of on the request, Administrator Johnson pointed out ized 2' x 2' directional sign has been installed to direct potential buyers to the sales trailer, that the Council should direct that this or any o be removed. approval of an of the sign �r. Ballard ot tall, and ve right-of- hat he will ing who wishes oot sideyard ot sign post , n the condition 1 of the sign some future time. �ward Bream, ry sales , Mr. Bream on August 1, e discussion at an unauthor- Marie Avenue suggested r similar signs Councilman Mertensotto moved to grant an extension to Eagle Point Development for their temporary sales facility per it, extending the original permit to August l, 1983, conditioned upon com- pliance with all regulations on additional signing and removal of any unauthorized signs. c Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 1683 August 3, 1982 "" Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. CASE #CAO-82-01, The Council acknowledged and discussed an application from Mr. NONNEMACHER Thomas Nonnemacher for review of his critical area site plan �or Lot 4, Mayfield Heights Addition. The Council also acknowledged a memo from the Public Works Director relative to the site plan, C explaining the application and describing the lot and recommending that the site plan be approved. Public Works Director Danielson advised the Council that all of the conditions of the Critical Area Ordinance have been complied with and all that remains is the erosion control measures. C Councilman Mertensotto moved approval of the Critical Area site plan with the condition that proper erosion control methods be employed. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays : 0 CASE #82-13, COLON, Mr. Vern Colon and Mr. .Charles Bartholdi, representatives of VARIANCE Federal Land Company, were present to request approval of a variance to allow an application for planned unit development for a parcel of property consisting of 5.62 acres, rather than 10 acres as required by the Zoning Ordinance. The Council acknowlec receipt of several letters supporting the variance application, a petition in favor of the variance signed by a number of City ' residents, along with memos from the City Planner and Public Works Director. The Council also acknowledged minutes of the July 27th Planning Commission meeting wherein the Commission recommended approval of the variance. Mr. Colon acknowledged that he understands that the variance must be considered and approved before he may make application to the Planning Commission for a conditional use permit for a planned unit development. Mr. Colon pointed out that a petition, which had been received i�y the Council, was signed by several surround- � ing property owners and that he has met with Jerry Shaughnessy and reviewed the concept of a revised townhouse development plan. He stated that Mr. Shaughnessy advised him that based on the new proposed plan, he would have no objection to the townhouse concept. Mr. Bartholdi, legal counse� for Federal Land Company, displayed drawings of the property and a potential townhouse layout. He stated that since the matter before the Council relates only to the varia�ce, he would reserve any comments on a PUD concept unt31 such time as a PUD application is heard. Mr. Bartholdi expressed the opinion that the Council must only answer two questions on the issue with reference to the variance: whether a substantial hardship exists and whether a substantial portion of the property would be preserved through the PUD process which would not be preserved through a single family development. With reference to hardship, Mr. Bartholdi stated that the property consists of only 5.62 acres and is surrounded by developed property so there is no property available to expand the site size to the required 10 acre area. He also noted that a second problem, storm water drainage i m C Page No. 1684 August 3, 1982 on the site and to adjacent properties to the nort east also exists. : He stated that in order to resolve the st rm water drainage problems,Federal Land Company has develop d and proposed a ponding area to alleviate the problems for both n site water and water draining onto the property from the adja ent land. He suggested that single family development of the si e would not allow development of a ponding area. He pointed o t if the variance were granted and the PUD were considered, the impo tant aspect in the PUD would be the retention of natural ameni ies and the City control of landscape design and the placement of all of the units. He stated that the new concept for a PUD w uld preserve site lines and views of all existing homes in the rea, the structures would be single story units, 14 feet hi h. He noted that if the variance were not granted and single f ily development would occur, two story, 20 foot high structures co ld be constructed and views from the surrounding area would not be p otected. Two architects representing Federal Land Company, amon Farber and John Pope, reviewed potential landscaping plans an artists renditions of the proposed development for the are . Among other information presented, it was noted that there wou d be a housing coverage of 16.5� under the concept, 11� of the ar a would be used for pavement, and the remaining 72.5� of the ea would be open space. The concept would address a maximum o 16 units, two units back to back, with a mixture of roof lin s. Two members of the audience asked questions relati e to potential assessments to adjoining propertyowners for storm ewer improve- ments and the possible connection of Miriam and Hi watha. Mr. Colon stated that he would be willing to commit to all costs involved in the development of the site, including the Miriam Hiawatha connection, but could not commit himself o total costs for storm sewer drainage system improvements�. � Councilman Losleben stated that Mr. Bartholdi has ndicated that there is a hardship based on the inability to acqu re enough land to meet the PUD area requirement. He asked whethe the applicants knew there was no available property in the area a the time that the property was purchased. He indicated that he oes not believe the lack of available space constitutes a hardship. _ � , Councilman Mertensotto pointed out that it is the the Council to represent the interest of the City, in the area surrounding the Colon property have be C past proposals for a PUD on the site. He suggeste Council approves the variance, the applicant might court if the conditional use permit application is and denied. He stated that he would have no objec granting of the variance to allow Mr. Colon to wor surrounding property..owners to see if a townhouse be acceptable to them, but pointed out to Mr. Colo neighbors object to a proposal, he will again be f same problems he has faced in past conditional use sideration. Mr. Colon pointed out that he has sub from the neighbors approving of the variance and t �esponsibility of and that people :n agai.nst all '� that if the take the City to later considered ion to the with the .evelopment could that if the ced with the permit con- .itted a petition at all he is C Ayes: 3 Nays: 2, Losleben, Hartmann Case #82-15, SUBURBAN LIGHTING (SURFCO) SIGN VARIANCE Page No. 1685 August 3, 1982 � asking for is variance approval so that � PUD can later be considered. Councilman Losleben stated that the land was first purchased with the knowledge that no additional space was available to allow enough size for a PUD under the Ordinance and could see no hardship on which to base variance approval. Councilman Hartmann felt that the variance application is really a request for a change in zoning and did not want to take any action which might set a precedent for similar future variance applications. Councilwoman Witt felt that several of the signatures on the letters and some signatures on the petition were by people outside the •350 foot radius required under the abstractor's certificate. She asked that Mr. Colon confine any future petitions to those people on the abstractors list. Councilman Mertensotto stated that he would have no problem with approval of 'the variance as long as the applicant is confident that he can work out all problems with the neighbors, and on the basis that the Council reserves its right to deny any PUD application if it is not acceptable to the neighborhood. Councilwoman Witt moved approval of the variance from the 10 acre PUD area requirement, to allow the applicant to process a PUD application without any committment to approval of a PUD application. Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion. Representatives of Suburban Lighting Company were present to request approval of a variance to allow installation of a new Surfco Gas sign on the exiting pylon at the former Skelly Oil Station at TH 110 and Dodd Road. It was noted that the variance is necessary because the existing standard is located within six feet of the right-of-way of TH 110 and Dodd Road, whereas the Ordinance requires a 30 foot setback. Representatives of Suburban Lighting, present for the discussion, also advised the Council that they are requesting approval to install a price sign on the south side of the station building, as recommended by the Planning Commission, rather than their original request to place signs on the standary� which waizld be consistent with other stations in the City. It was the concensus of the Council that these signs posted on the stand��d would be preferable to signs placed on the structure. C Councilman Mertensotto moved approval of the sign setback varuance, along with approval of the installation of two 3'x5' gas price signs on the pole, on the condition that the pole height be a 15 foot maximum and that the price signs be placed nine feet above ground level. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 C � Page No. 1686 August 3, 1982 CASE #82-19, Mrs. Richard Gerhz was present to request approval GEHRZ, VARIANCE foot rearyard setback variance to allow the instal swimming pool at 1047 Marie Avenue. Mrs. Gerhz e � the variance was necessitated by an error on the c part in locating the swimming pool on the site. A discussion, the Council expressed its irritation w and several faults which occurred in construction foundation and directed staff to look into the mat whether the contractor's license should be revoked Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 of a six at ion o f a lained that ntractor's part of the th the contractor f the pool er to determine After discussion, Councilman Mertensotto moved app oval of the six foot rearyard setback variance at 1047 Marie Avenu , to allow installation of a swimming pool 24 feet from the r ar property line. Counci�lwoman Witt seconded the motion. FEASIBILITY Mr. Rollin Crawford was present to represent the B STUDY owners of property at the northwest quadrant of I3 Heights Road. Mr. Crawford stated the because of a portion of Bisanz's property, sewer access to th reduced. He asked that the Council authorize prep feasibility study to determine costs of the variou providing sewer to the property. He suggested tha urgency to the matter because of the impending con I35E and because the option of connecting to the w work is done on I35E may be precluded. � City Engineer Kishel advised the Council that the Comprehensive Plan of the City indicated a method subject site with sewer at some time in the futur the method is still valid, and that the property aware of the sewer information before purchasing pointed out that contiguous properties easterly o site will be served by a lift station accord'ing t were made many years ago. After d�scussion, Councilman Mertensotto moved the Resolution No. 82-65, "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PREP ON II�ROVEMENTS, " authorizing the City Engineer study subject to receipt of an escrow deposit to c of the report and further subject to receipt of an petition for improvements. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 C . Nays: 0 sanz family, E and Mendota n/DOT taking site is reation of a methods of •there is an truction of st after paving riginal o serve the He stated that ners were e property. He the Bisanz the plans which adoption of RATION OF REPORT o prepare a ver all costs appropriate CASE #82-17, There being no one present to disauss the Minnesot Federal S�vings BALYK, SUBDIVISION and Loan application for the replat of a portion of Delaware Crossing, discussion on the matter was tabled to t e next meeting. MISCELLANEOUS Mr. Cedric Kirshner, was present to request Counc'1 approval of the conduct of a sale at Cedric's warehouse, located i the Industrial park. Mr. Kirshner stated that he would like to c nduct a 10 day (maximum) warehouse sale open to the public within the next two weeks. Page No. 1687 `� August 3, 1982 After further discussion, Councilman Losleben moved approval of conduct of a warehouse sale at Cedric's warehouse, for one week, commencing August 9th, with the aption of a continued sale on August 20 and 21 and 22nd, on the basis that the sale be conducted during the hours of 11 to 5 PM on Sunday, 10 AM to 8 PM on Monday and noon to 8 PM on all other days. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 ( Nays: 0 BUROW POND City Engineer Kishel reviewed his memo to the Council relative to the draining of the Burow pond by Mr. Thomas Burow. He explained the history of the pond and platting of Rolling Green for the Council, and responded to several questions from residents of the area present for the discussion. Councilman Mertensotto moved that the City Admiriistrator to advise Mr. Burow to discontinue all pumping and to order removal of any obstruction to the City's storm sewer drainage system, and requesting that h� appear at the next Council meeting to explain the matter. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MISCELLANEOUS The City Clerk advised the Council of an error in the June 15th minutes, which minutes had included the adoption of a Resolution ordering preparation of assessment rolls. Mayor Lockwood moved approval of an amendment to the minutes of the June 15th meeting, reflecting the adoption of Resolution No. 82-51A, "RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLLS". Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ELDERLY HOUSING City Administrator Johnson advised the Council that the Wilder foundation is still diligently pursuing an elderly structure, and updated the Council on the status of the Wilder efforts. AUDIT Administrator Johnson distributed copies of the 1981 City financial audit,: and advised the Council that Mr. Steve Laible would be present for the next regular meeting to discuss the audit. CMISCELLANEOUS Council acknowledged receipt of copies of the'�1982 Stanton Report. Administrator Johnson distributed copies of a proposed street assessment policy for future Council discussion. � COMMENDATION Councilman Mertensotto moved the adoption of Resolution No. 82-66, "RESOLUTION COMMENDING KATHLEEN SWANSON FOR HER DEDICATION AND ATTAINMENT OF CERTIFICATION FROM THE MUNICIPAL CLERKS AND FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION". � Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 s ADJOURN Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 C ATTEST: Robert G.Lockwood Mayor C Page No. 1688 August 3, 1982 � There being no further business to come before the Councilman Hartmann moved that the meeting be adjo 7:30 P.M. on August lOth, when the Council will he departmental budget requests. - Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. TIME OF ADJOURNNIENT: 11:34 o'clock P.M. 0 Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk ! Council, irned to r the several � � Page No. September 7, 1982 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, September 7, 1982 , Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the C City of Mendota Heights was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at the City Hal South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. � Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The members were present: Mayor Lockwood, Councilmembers Hartmann, Loslei Mertensotto and Witt. ty Council, , 750 ollowing en, APPROVAL OF Mayor Lockwood moved approval of the Minutes of t e August lOth MINUTES meeting. ' i Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilwoman Witt moved approval of the minutes oi meeting with correction. ' Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. � Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Abstain: l, Losleben Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilman Losleben moved approval of the minutes 24th meeting. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Councilman Hartmann moved approval of the minutes 31st meeting with correction. ! Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. I i the August 17th �f the August of the August Councilwoman Witt moved approval of the consent c lendar as submitted and recommended for approval as part of the regular agenda, along with authorization for execution of all necessary documents contained therein. ; 1. Approval of the List of Claims dated Se� totalling $163,224.10. � ,2. Approval of the List of Licenses, granting 1 H.G. Anderson Masonry Concrete Licens Senderkey Concrete Concrete Licens Teals Masonry, Inc. Concrete Licens Delory Company Excavating Lice Dependable Excavating Co. Inc.Excavating Lice Etzel Excavation Excavating Lice Alton Anderson General Contrac Larkin Construction General Contrac 7, 1982, and nses to: se se or's License or's License L'clC�l. lVU. September 7, 1982 Manard, Inc. Genaral Con�.ractor's License Pin2view, Inc. General Contractor's License Urban Unit Corporation General Contractor's License Walter's Constructian, Inc. General Cantractor's License 3. Approval of the issuance af 3_2 on-sale malt liquor licenses ta T.�'. Baker for St. Petear's Church for September 18 & 19 and October 3, authora.zing that fees for the temporary licenses be waived. 4. Acknowledgement af the Minutes af the August 24 Planning Commission meeting, the August 18th NDC4 meeting minutes, acknowledgement of the Code Enforcement Officer's month].y repor� for August, and acknowledgement af the Fire Department monthly report far August. Cauncilmari Losleben seconded the motion, Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 HEARING--FEDERAL Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpose af a public REVENUE SH1�IRING hearing on the Proposed Use of 1982/83 Federal Revenue allocations. Adminis�.rator �'ohnson advised the Council that a natice ot the public hearing to consider the use of the�Federal Revenue allocations for entztlement period 14 had been pub7.ished in the City's legal newspaper. He statec3 that the City e�ec�s to receive $26,500 during this entitlement period and anticipates application of the funds to the deficit in the funding of �he Public Works Garage construction. Mr. John�on advised that the $62,200 deficit in �.he fund would be reduced to approximately $36,Op0 after applica�,ion of the revenue sharing monies. The balance of the deficit wou].d thereafter be funded by the unappropriated General Fund surplus. Mayor Lockwood asked for questions and comments irom the auclienca. There being no questions ar comments fram the audience, Councilwoman Witt moved that the heari.ng be clased at 7;�8 o'clock P.M.and that the anticipated 1982J83 (EP-1.4) Federal Revenue sharing alloca�Gion be applied against the Public Works Garage construction fund deficit. Councilman Har�mann secondecl the mation. Ayes: 5 Nays: Q HEAFtING--1983 Mayor Lackwood opened the meeting far the purpase of a public hearing DEPAI2TMENTAL on the 1983 departmental budge� requests. He �.urned the meeting BUDGET REQUESTS over �o Administratar Johnson for review and discussion. Administratar Jahnson advised the Council that a part of the Federal Revenue sharing guicielines and raquiremants include the canduct af a public hearing on the proposed 1983 budgei. He advised the Cauncil that as of this date the budget has not been completed, hawever thP departmental budget requests, indicating proposed expenditures fai 1983, have been subrnitted. He advised the Council that notices of hearing had laeen published in the Sun Newspaper, and �hat the notice included the departmental requests alang w5.th antica.pated 1983 expenditures far General Fund aperations. Mr. Jahnson advised that he does not anticipate any cutbacks in the propasals in consa.deration Page No. September 7, 1982 of the fact that they are only 6 to 6} $ increase and it appears that revenues to support the proposed expe ditures can be generated. Councilman Mertensotto asked what the net effect o of departmental expenditure requests will be in te Administrator Johnson responded that he anticipate City decrease. Treasurer Shaughnessy advised that a 7 to 8� reduction in the City's mill rate, and t for a 10� across the board valuation increase, the would amount to approximately a 2� increase in the the real estate tax. Mayor Lockwood asked for questions and comments the composite ms of tax dollars. a 1.4 mill he anticipates at after allowing net result City portion of the audience. There being no questions or comments from the audi nce, Mayor Lockwood moved that the hearing on the projected 1 83 expenditu�es be closed at 7:58 P.M. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. � Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 DUPONT ADDITION Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpose f a public hear ASSESSMENT on the proposed assessment roll for public improve ents to serve HEARING the Michael D. DuPont Addition. He turned the me ing over to Public Works Director Danielson for review and his ory of the project. ; Mr. Danielson described the improvements which ha He stated that the plat consists of eleven new lo sanitary s'ewer, water, storm sewer, street curb a sidewalk improvements. He advised the Council th front on both Walsh Lane and Summit Lane are incl ment roll because they received sanitary sewer an improvements as part of the project. He noted th division of the lots is possible in both cases. advised that the public street (Victoria Court) h completed because of unstable ground conditions. the street construction has been removed from the will be completed by purchase order sometime next advised the Council that the concrete pedestrian � Victoria to the south boundary of the school prop included in the project in accordance with the ag: the School District and Mr. DuPont. He further a easement agreement with Mr. Marty Evans requires� ing property lines, and that this will be compl� He further advised that sufficient money has b� accomplish the planting of the shrubs and complet. He stated that the estimated feasibility cost was cost was $126,000. The estimated per lot assessm� feasibility study was $11,000, and the assessment lesser assessments. He advised the audience that roll is adopted, assessments may be paid to the C: 30 days, and that unremitted assessments would th� certified to the County for collection over a ten street improvements and 19 years for all other im� an interest rate of 11}� per year. He pointed oui � been installed. ; which received I gutter and : two lots which led in the assess- watermain : an east/west . Danielson ; not been fe stated that �roject and �ummer . He .lkway from ty had been ement between ised that an antings along exis� ed next spring. n escrowed to n of the street, 149,000 and actual t in the oll reflects f the assessment y Hall within eafter be ear period for ovements, at that there are ��- Page No. September 7, 1982 no service connections for Lots 10 and 12 since those lots must be served from Victoria. Mayor Lockwood asked for questions and`comments from the audience. There being no questions or comments, Councilman Mertensotto moved that the hearing be closed at 8:08 o'clock P.M. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilman Mertensotto moved the adoption of Resolution No. 82-73, "RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR MICHAEL D. DUPONT ADDITION IMPROVEMENTS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 81, PROJECT NO. 8)". Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 530 FREMONT The Council acknowledged a memo from the Code Enforcement Officer AVENUE relative to the status of the structure moved to 530 Fremont Avenue. There being no representation by the property owner, the matter was tabled to the next meeting. LYONS PRIDE Mayor Lockwood noted that the discussion on a request for sign permits for the Lyons PrideConvenience Store and Royal Car Service had been tabled from the August 17th meeting. Mr. Greg Lyons, owner of the property, was present for the discussion. He advised the Council that he would like to install two signs on the wall of the building, using plastic letters with low wattage lighting. The lettering would consist of 12 to 15 inch high capital letters for the convenience store with 8 inch letters for Royal Car Service. He stated that the signs would be attached to the facade of the building. He stated that the proposed signing will not extend any higher than what currently exists. Mayor Lockwood pointed out that in the Code Enforcement Officer's memo dated August 17th, he advised that the total area of the two signs would not exceed the area allowed in the City's sign ordinance. Councilwoman Witt expressed concern that no c7rawings have been submitted to the Council and that she would like to see the drawings which would indicate the size of the sign, height of the letters and length of the sign. After discussion, Mayor Lockwood moved approval of issuance of a sign permit for the two signs as requested, on the condition that satisfactory drawings which include the size of the sign, length of the sign and height of the letters, be submitted to staff. Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 1, Witt FIRE STATION Mayor Lockwood advised the audience that the City Council is ARCHITECT attempting to locate and construct an eight bay fire station to SEI,ECTION replace the old, existing fire facility via tax increment financi He reviewed the history of the proposed structure and advised that three architectural firms have been interviewed, those firms being Robert David Burow Architect, Trossen & Wright, and Architectural Alliance. The Council members discussed their reaction to each of the interviews, and it was the general Ayes: 5 ( Nays: ' 0 TH110/149 INTERSECTION Page No. September 7, 1982 concensus that any of the three candidates would choice, however, the choice must be based on the factor, and that the bid received from Trossen & lowest of the three proposals. a good nancial ight was the After discussion, Mayor Lockwood moved that Tross n& Wright be selected as the architects for the proposed new f're station. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Administrator Johnson advised that staff has met ith Mn/DOT officials to discuss the TH 110/149 intersection nd that another meeting will be held on September 21st at which time the Mn/DOT representatives will give staff cost estim tes relative to the feasibility of highway improvements in this a ea. ELDERLY HOUSING Mayor Lockwood reviewed the history of discussion H. Wilder Corporation relative to construction of housing facility in Mendota Heights. He advised if the City pursues the possibility of 125 condom has been discussed, a housing plan and program wo prepared, approved and submitted to the Minnesota Agency. ; Mr. Jack Klepp, representing the AHW Corporation, osed resolution which would authorize the Dakota Redevelopment Authority to both prepare the housi issue and sell single family housing revenue bond stated that the purpose of the revenue bonds woul financing, at reduced interest rates, to first-ti to allow them to purchase residences for a maximu of $75,600, from senior citizens who move into th units. Councilman Losleben stated that when the desire f was first discussed by the Council, the des3re wa income housing for the elderly as an objective. the only real incentive presented now is to new b senior citizens. He also suggested that construc can be accomplished on the open market, without t governmental agencies. In response to concern over the desirability of a plan, Administrator Johnson advised that the hou plan which states the City's objective to develop with the communities of West St. Paul and Eagan. indicate that in order to accomplish the goal, ta financing and housing finance bonds would be nece down the interest rates to the new home buyers. with the Amherst an elderly he audience that nium units, as ld have to be Housing Financing reviewed a prop- ounty Housing and g plan and to . Mr. Klepp be to provide e home buyers purchase price condominium r elderly housing to provide low e suggested that yers, not to ion of a facility � need for other .opting a housing ing plan is a elderly housing The plan would increment sary to write Councilman Mertensotto felt there were too many u answered questions He stated that he has no problem with the Wilder nvolvement in the development of elderly housing in the City but do s not believe the City should get involved with housing revenue bonds or a housing plan. Councilman Losleben stated that he believe there is a need for elderly housing but that the original objecti e has been lost. C Yage No. September 7, 1982 He stated that he is uncomfortable with all the steps in the proce�� and the participation by so many agencies. He felt that there must be some way to accomplish the Council's original elderly housing goal without involving so many agencies. ' After discussion, Councilwoman Witt moved the adoption of Resolution No. 82-77, "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DAKOTA COUNTY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO EXERCISE, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, THE POWERS CONFERRED BY MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 462C.01 TO 462C.08, RELATING TO PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BOND HOUSING PROGRAM". Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 2, Mertensotto Losleben Councilman Hartmann moved to establish a public hearing on a proposed housing plan for October 19th at 8:45 o'clock P.M. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 RECESS Mayor Lockwood called a recess at 9:55 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 10:07 o'clock P.M. PRELIMINARY PLAT �, Carmen Tuminelly was present to review and request approval of the preliminary plat for the proposed Tumi.neTl.y's Hunter's Lane Addition, which consists of the replat�ing of Lots 1 and 2, of the Culligan Knoll Addition. Mr. Tuminelly proposed that the 2.2 acres be divided into two new lots, plus a lot which contains the existing structure which will be remodeled and renovated. He noted that each of the lots will be approximately 22,000 square , feet, and that he proposes to dedicate a 30 foot strip of land on the north border of Lots 1 and 2 as right-of-way for a future street. Mr. Tuminelly stated that he would like to keep the 30 foot strip as a private roadway for the present and dedicate it as right-of-way at some future date. Councilman Mertensotto pointed out that, in order to be buildable, a residential lot must front on a public street. Attorney Winthrop advised the Council that the right-of-way should be required immediately, not dedicated at ,a later date. Mr. Tuminelly stated that he wo.uld•have no objection to the immediate dedication. As part of the discussion on utility services, Mr. Tuminelly indicated C that he wants to install the sewer and water utilities himself. It was the recommendation of staff and the concensus of the Council that public utility installation would not be allowed, it must be done in the same manner as other public utility construction, utilizing City Engineer and contracts. Planning Commission Chairperson Kru�se was present for the discussio^ and pointed out that the Planning Commission recommendation for approval provided that drainage toward the Barber lot be addressed. Public Works Director Danielson pointed out that perhaps a land- scaping and grading plan should be required as part of the platting approval process, and noted that since the proposed plat �. a Ayes: 5 Naysc 0 September 7, 1982 is within the Critical Area Overlay District, the mandatory review before any permits can be issued construction. � After discussion, Mayor Lockwood moved approval of plat for the Tuminelly's Hunter Lane Addition. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. will be a the preliminary It was assumed by the Council in the granting of t e preliminary plat approval that the applicant will dedicate a 3 foot right-of- way for the use of the public street and for insta lation of utilities, that the applicant will submit grading nd drainage plans to the City staff for review and approval. n the granting of the preliminary plat, Council acknowledged that variances will be necessary in order to allow two structures to constructed on the lots on the 30 foot dedicated right-of-way ather than the completed public street. CASE #CAO-82-02, Mr, Jerry Bisari and Mr. Jeff Albrecht from Design Y� present to request approval of an application for setback variance for Lot 11, Block l, Ivy Falls We Addition, property owned by Dr. Alexander Yue. Mr the lot, showing the Council drawings of the lot, structure, grades, etc. He explained that since t Commission meeting, the plans have been redrawn, a house, as proposed, will fall within the City's he and no variance will be necessary for height. He site plan has also been redrawn and it is requeste' applicant be allowed to locate the proposed reside� in an average of 44 feet from the 40� bluff line. P.lanning Commission Chairperson Kruse advised the concerns of the Planning Commission relative to t lot, and the need for landscaping along the drive structure i.n order to screen the Rubin lot from h I Councilwoman Witt moved to grant approval of the � Ordinance setback variance as requested, based on revised August 31, 1982, and received by the City based on the condition that the structvre will no� building height and that screening be placed alon� towards the future Rubin home. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 5PERRY UNIVAC Mr. Jerry Junkman, of Ryan Construction, and Mr. ADDITION Mr. Tom Guyerre, from 5perry Univac, were present approval of a building permit to create a preciou reclamation laboratory within the existing wareho Sperry Univac structure. The gentlemen explained intent of Sperry Univac to reclaim gold and other from "computers", and they explained the chemical involved in such reclamation. They also explaine� permits necessary from the Pollution Control Agen� •Commission and other agencies. They answered sev� Forum, were ritical area t Second Bisari reviewed he proposed e Planning d that the ght requirement tated that the that the tial structure uncil of the adjacent Rubin to the Yue liahts. �itical Area he site plan �eptember 2, 1982, exceed acceptable the driveway rnie Wa'rd and o request metals e area in the hat it is the recious metals roce sse s the various , Waste Control al Council � Page No. September 7, 1982 questions relative to safety precautions and the effect of the discharge into the City's sewer system. After discussion, Mayor Lockwood moved authorization for the issuance of a building permit for Sperry Univac and Ryan Construction Company to create a reclamation lab within the existing Sperry Univac facility, subject to receipt of all necessary state, City, and other permits, and conditioned upon immediate notification to the City of any rejection of state permits. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 , , Abstain: 1, Hartmann NSP CONDITIONAL Mr. Bob Burg, from Northern States Power Company, was present to USE PERMIT request Council approval of the change in the conditional use � permit for installation of a wall around the Roger's Lake substation. Eie advised the Council that while NSP had originally proposed installation of a concrete wall around the structure, it is now felt that wood construction would be preferable, both in terms of financi.ng and � sthetics. He advised the Council that the owners of the adjacent property, Eide Enterprises, find the wood construction acceptable, and that NSP believes it is more aestheticall� pleasing than concrete would be. He advised that NSP will maintain the wall and will not allow it to deteriorate. Councilwoman Witt moved approval of a change in the original conditional use permit granted to NSP to allow installation of a green pressure treated timber wall around the Roger's Lake sub- station, with the condition that vines be planted on the outside of the w�ll. � Councilman Hartsnann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 COMMUNICATIONS The Council acknowledged receipt of a letter from the Mn/DOT relative to the Mendota Interchange. HUMAN RESOURCE Mayor Lockwood moved renewal of the contract with Human Resource ASSOCIATES Associates for one year, on the basis of a�130'per referral charge. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CON1�'lUNICATIONS The Council acknowledged receipt of a'Spotlight on the Metropolitan Waste Control Commis'sion", advising of a meeting to be conducted on Septmber 24. The Council also acknowledqed receipt of a notice from the Hozza Associates, Inc. relative to a meeting of the Joint ' Airport Zoning Board to be h�ld on September 9th. HIGHWAY BONDING The Council acknowledged receipt of an Association of Metropolitan Municipalities bulletin regarding several items, in particular � the proposed Constitutional Amendment #2 on highway bonding. The Council concurred in the Administrator's opinion that this Constitutional Amendment is particularly important and should be supported and publicized. � C � • ' � Page No. September 7, 1982 Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Resolutio: "RE50LUTION SUPPORTING CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT #2, TO THE MINNESOTA CONSTITUTION ON HIGHWAY BONDING, T� RESTRICTIONS ON THE INTEREST RATES FOR AND THE AMOU1 HIGHWAY BONDS." Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. � Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CABLE Mayor Lockwood moved to accept Councilman Losleben' COMMUNICATIONS as City representative to the NDC4 and to appoint C Witt as the representative. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. P,ye s : 5 Nays: 0 � STREET ASSESSMENT Discussion on the proposed street assessment pol POLICY the City Administrator several weeks ago, was ta meeting. , TRUNK SEWER The Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from ACQUISITION trator•recommending support of_the.City of Mendota application of a sanitary sewer system. The memo adoption of a proposed resolution requesting MWCC the Mendota Heights trunk sewer system from the he Mendota at such time as the Mendota collection sys� � No. 82-74, AN AMENDMENT � REMOVE fT OF TRUNK resignation ncilwoman distributed by i to the next �e City Adminis- HUD•funding ther recommended uisition of house into � is constructed. Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Resoluti n No. 82-75, "RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACQUISITION OF THE 9 TO 18 NCH MENDOTA HE TRUNK SEWER BY THE METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM SSION". Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 � Nays: 0 T.FAVE OF ABSENCE On the recommendation of Police Chief Delmont, Mayc that Police Clerk Carol Bakka be granted an unpaid absence from September 27 through October l, along hire temporary clerical help during her absence. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 ' Nays: 0 MISCELLANEOUS ZONING SIC�iS The Council acknowledged receipt of the Engineer for August. �r Lockwood moved leave of with approval to Status Report The Council discussed a suggestion that signs be p aced on properties, for which zoning or development requests have been made to notify � interested parties of impending public hearings. _ Councilman Losleben moved to direct staff to conta t communities +� which post properties and prepare a report and rec mmendations relative to preparation of an ordinance providing or the posting of properties under development consideration. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. Sep�ember 7�, �,982 DELINQUENT Councilman Mertensotto moved the adoption of Resolutian No. 82-7( SEWER ACCQUDITS "RE50LUTION CERTIE'XING DELINQUENT SANITARY SEWER RENTAL CHARGES TO THE D.A.I�OTA COUNfiY AUDIT012 FOR COLLECTION WITH REAL ESTATE TAXES". Councilman Iiartmann secanded. the mo�.ian. Ayes: 5 I3ays: 0 ELECTION JUDGES Coizncilwoman Witt moved approval. af a list of additional and emergency judges af electian for the September 14th Prirnary Elec�ion. Mayar Loalswoad seconded the mtoion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ELDERLY HOUSING Caunciiman Losleben moved to c3irect staf� to prepare and submit advertisements to Construction Bulletin soliciting praposals, including financing details, for construction of an elderly housa.ng facility. '� Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 2, Witt FIartmann ADJOtIRN There being no further business to came befare the Council, Councilman Hartm:ann moved that the meeting be adjourned. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 12:15 o`clock A.M. Kathleen M. 6wansan City Clerk � Robert G. Lockwood Mayor l t raye No. September 21, 1982 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, September 21, 1982 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the Ci y Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at the City Hal , 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. � Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The f llowing members were present: Mayor Lockwood, Councilmen Hartmann and Mertenso to and Councilwoman Witt. Councilman Losleben had notified the Council that e would be out of town. CONSENT Councilman Mertensotto moved approval of the consent calendar as CALENDAR submitted and recommended for approval as part of th regular agenda, along with authorization for execution of al necessary documents contained therein. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 COMMUNICATIONS l 1. Approval of the List of Claims dated September 2�, 1982 and totalling $115,720.84. 2. Approval of the List of Licenses, granting licen es to: Rudy Lenz, Inc. Concrete Licen e Dick Levine Excavating Co. Excavating Lic nse JSR General Contractor General Contra tor License Site Services, Inc. General Contra tor License 3. Acknowledgement of the Minutes of the September Sth Planning Commission meeting, the September lst NDC-4 meet'ng, and the monthly Treasurer's report for August. 4 .. Adoption of Resolution No. 82-78, "RESOLUTION A' PTING WORK AND APPROVI•NG, FINAL PAYMENT (IMPROVEMENT NO. 81, PROJECT N0. DUPONT ADDITION," authorizing final payment of $ 0,252.92 for work completed on the project. � Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. ; 0 8) Mr. Bernard Friel was present to discuss his letter requesting the installation of "no hunting" signs. Mr. Friel indi ated that, particularly during duck hunting season, there are. lways a number of hunters discharging weapons near the ponds locat d on the School District property at the south end of the City. He asked that the Council authorize installation of signs at Dodd Roa and Blue Gentian, Blue Gentian and Delaware, Pagel Road at Hazel Cour and Huber Drive at Delaware to remind hunters approaching the area that hunting is not allowed in Mendota Heights and there y discourage the activity. Mr. Friel advised that he has contacted he Police rayu ivv. September 21, 1982 • Department when he has observed hunters in the area but that he does not believe citations have been issued in response to the violations. Councilman Mertensotto felt that approval of the request c�uld resu� in the receipt of many other, similar requests, and suggested that a better approach would be to direct the Police Chief to order patrolling in the area early in the morning along with the issuance of citations for any violations. Councilwoman Witt advised that hunting is allowed in the rural areas ( of Eagan, if certain conditions exist, and agreed that signs to indicate the no hunting regulation should relieve the problem of hunters crossing Blue Gentian from Eagan. Mayor Lockwood felt that perhaps a no-hunting and trapping sign should be placed on or near the City limits sign at the south end of the City on Dodd Road. After discussion, and an apparent concensus of the Council to approve signing, the matter was referred to the Police Chief for a report on hunting activities in the area along with a history of past citations issued (or lack of citations) and a recommendation on whether signs should be installed and if so where minimal signage should occur. EAGLE'POINT Mayvr Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing " on an application from the Eagle Point Development Company for amendment to the Eagle Point planned unit development. Mr. Bruce Martin of Lanvesco Corporation advised the Council that thr applicants are requesting a change in the PUD to reduce the number of units from 60 to 54 and to construct the buildings in two phases consisting of 27 units per building. Mr. Martin reviewed an overlay of the proposed PUD over the originally approved Eagle Point PUD. He advised that the originally approved building location and setbacks and exterior design will be maintained but that the unit size would be increased to a range of 1572 to 2408 square feet. He indicated that the sales prices will range from $150,000 to $270,000. Mr. Martin also requested approval of a new final plat which would create a lot and block for each of the two structures as opposed to the original plat which consisted of a single lot/block for the entire parcel. Councilman Mertensotto stated that his only caution relative to the proposed platting is the potential for change in parcel ownership before construction of-the second structure. Mayor Lockwood asked for questions and comments from the audience. There being no questions or comments, Councilman Mertensotto moved that the hearing be closed at 8:13 P.M. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Mayor Lockwood moved the adoption of Resolution No. 82-79, "RESOLUTION APPROVING EAGLE POINT P.U.D. AMENDMENT." Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Page No. September 21, 1982 � Councilman Mertensotto moved the adoption of 82-80, "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR N0. 6". Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 solution No. LE RIDGE PLAT 528 FREMONT In response to an invitation from the Counci , Mr. Peter � Schwartz was present to advise the Council o the proposed schedule for completion of a structure moved to 528 Fremont. Mayor Lockwood advised Mr. Schwartz that the Council has asked staff why the structure was still on s ilts early in September even though approval of a variance to allow moving of the structure was conditioned upon complet�ion by August lst. Aye s : 4 Nays: 0 MENDOTA PLAZA Mr. Schwartz stated that the reason for the is that he was unable to get a performance b He advised the Council that the house has no its foundation, the garage slab has been pou is being put in and the roof is about half f asked the Council to grant an extension of t to July 1, 1983, but acknowledged that the C Officer has given him a December 1, 1982 dea elay in completion nd until July lst. been placed on ed, the plumbing nished. He � e completion date de Enforcement line. After discussion, Councilman Mertensotto mov d that an exten- sion to December l, 1982 be granted to Mr. S hwartz for the completion of all improvements required unde the original performance bond data sheet and building per it. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. ' Mr. William Sheehy was present to review an cription of several renovation activities p completed at the Mendota Plaza Shopping Cen the discussion, Mr. Sheehy advised the Coun representatives of MGM Liquors could not re space and other details and that he is now details with Star Liquors and a potential p After review of the "description of work" a proposed renovation, Mr. Sheehy invited the his "laundry list." Mr. Sheehy asked that to consider the matter again at the next me of the work, such as painting, can be�compl ' discuss a des- oposed to be er. As part of il that he and ch agreement over egotiating tenancy zza parlor lessee. d drawings of Council to add to he Council agree ting, so that some ted before winter. � Several additional items were suggested by he Council members including such details as extension of the etal facade around the entire structure, increased lighting in the mall area, placement of the benches on the interior, r ther than exterior walls of the mall area as proposed by Mr. S eehy, and other details. City Administrator Johnson suggested to the Council that the majority of the items contained in Mr. Shee y's list, do not normally receive prior Council approval or onsideration, and unless the Council so directs, there is no eason for Mr. Sheehy not to accomplish painting before an other approvals. � ruy C tvv . September 21, 1982 Mayor Lockwood noted that there were members of the audience present for the discussion and asked for their comments. Mr. Richard Stryker, owner of the Dakota County State Bank Building, commented that the shopping center is obviously in need of attention, pointing out that the masonry is in bad shape, ceiling tiles are falling down, and it needs painting. He noted that at such time as T.H. 149 is realigned, the center will be oriented towards South Plaza Drive and pointed out the lack of landscaping, the weeds, and the generally unsightly conditions. He pointed out that the tennants in his several million dollar structure have had to look at a very unappealing shopping center for the past ten years and felt that something to enhance its appearance should be done before the off- sale liquor issue is resolved. Mr. Sam Shepard, Manager of Minnesota Federal, a tennant of the center, asked whether the "laundry list" would be accomplished whether or not a liquor license is issued. Mr. Sheehy responded that some of the items will probably be accomplishec because the center is very hard to rent. He stated that painting and sign renovation would occur whether or not a liquor license is approved. Mayor Lockwood stated, in response to the liquor issue, that he will take the position that a public hearing should be conducted before any decisiori is made on adoption of off-sale liquor provisions. He suggested to Mr. Sheehy that he should proceed with painting and other repairs which should be done. DELAWARE CROSS- Mr. Tom Balyk and Mr. Robert McKinstry, representing Minnesota ING REPLAT Federal Savings and Loan, were present to request approval of the final plat for the Delaware Crossing Second Addition. In response to a reminder from Councilman Mertensotto of the conditions attached to the preliminary plat approval, Mr. Balyk advised that deeds to convey title to Outlots B and C to the City have been prepared. He asked the Council to adopt a resolution to support the Minnesota FSL request for tax abatement which has been submitted to the County. Mr. McKinstry stated that his firm will take the responsibility for paying the taxes in order to resolve the situation but asked that the City cooperate in the abatement effort. He advised that if the abatement is denied by the County his firm will pay the taxes and convey the deeds to the City. The City Council expressed its intent to support the abatement and take the position that the payment of taxes is the responsibility of the grantor should the abatement not be granted. � With the understanding that Minnesota Federal Savings and Loan has aqreed to be responsible for the taxes on Outlots B and C and intends to deed said outlots to the City as required in the original platting agreement, and with the understanding that the City will support a resolution to be submitted by the applicant on October Sth relative to abatement of taxes on said outlots, Councilman Mertensotto r , ray�: ivv. September 21, 1982 . • moved the adoption of Resolution No. 82-81, "RESOLUTION AP ROVING L'INAL PLAT FOR DELAWARE CROSSING SECOND ADDITION." � Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. � Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 ' FIRE STATION City Attorney Winthrop and the Council members revie ed the proposed ARCHITECT agreement for Fire Station architectural services. fter discussion, AGREEMENT Mr. Winthrop was directed to review several details ith Trossen and Wright and report to the Council on October Sth. FIRE DEPARTMENT Councilman Mertensotto advised the Council that Assis MATTERS Dale Peterson, is planning on retiring sometime after and that the annual fire department meeting will occu at which time the department will ordinarily elect of coming year. He stated that he suspects that Assista Peterson will, at the annual meeting, advise the depa that he will be retiring and would not then accept th Chief appointment for 1983. In view of these circums the Council to direct the City Administrator to write Fire Chief Noack, advising him that the Council has d possible retirement of Assistant Chief Dale Peterson that it be the Council's intent to reappoint both Chi . Assistant Chief Peterson. However, if the Assistant that he will be retiring, it would then be the Counci appoint Fire Captain Gene Lange as the Assistant Fire Councilman Mertensotto advised the Council that he ha Chief Noack and Captain Lange and has their concurren potential appointment of Captain Lange if the Councill MISCELLANEOUS ant Fire Chief, January 1, 1983, next month, 'icers for the t Chie f tment members Assistant ances, he asked a letter to scussed the nd suggested f Noack and hief confirms 's intent to Chief. spoken to both e on the is in agreement. It was the concensus of the Council to agree with the recommendations expressed by Councilman Mertensotto, particularly in iew of the fact that such activity is in accordance with the require ents of the Ordinance establishing and setting forth procedures �f�Or the Fire Department. , � Councilwoman Witt advised the Council on NDC4 activit�ies. . I AIRPORT LAND The Council acknowledged and discussed a letter prep ed by John USE SAFETY Shardlow to present the City's concerns regarding air ort land use ZONING safety zoning. The Council directed that the letter e executed by Mayor Lockwood and submitted to Mn/DOT. MISCELLANEOUS The Council referred a letter from Mr. Brent Baskfie to Attorney Winthrop for review. , � � STREET ASSESS- The Council briefly discussed a memo and proposed resolution which MENT POLICY had been distributed on August 3rd, relative to stree�t assessment policy adoption. � 1983 LEVY Administrator Johnson distributed and briefly review �d a memo � relative to anticipated 1983 General Fund revenues ar�d the proposed levy. Discussion was tabled to October 5th. � Page No. September 21, 19$2 ' ' - ADJOURN There being no further busine5s to came befare the Council, Cauncilwoman Wi�t moved �hat �he meeting be adjaurned. Councilman Hartmann secanded the mation. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 TZME OE' ADJOURNMENT: I1c20 o'clock P.M. Kathleen M. Swansan City Clerk ATTEST: Rabert G. Lackwaad Mayor 10/5/82 CLAIMS LTST ' CHECK REGISTER �NOUNT VENDOR , 3.96 80YER TRK&EHUIP INC 3.96 *� 226.5G 226�.50 �, 2�5.QJ3 �n�_nn *. 123.6Q i23.6� *� 81.60., 81.bf! _ *; 114.? B"� � 114.18�- _--_ 47.44 37.14 84.58 *� lUl.�� 101.�.0 * � AIRPORT M�D CLINIC EL MARKETI N6 FZRESTflNE STORES GENER AL SAFE Tlf E.�UIP STEPHEN LiSSICK NORTHER N AUTONOTIVE NORTHERN AUT.OMOT.IVE �TATE OF IMINN ___� Y.. - - •..- - _-y.-.. - -_ _� . 49.98 � 550.?3 RADIA70R SVC CO 55Q �" � *. 33.J� . HIGHLAND NURSERY - ---- 3 3 . J ^ � *, -_- Y - ------------- 8.33 ST PAUL EMPL ASSN 8.33 ST PAUL E�IPI ASSN 25.� 0 ST PA UL EMP� ASSN 8.34 ST PAUL'ENPL ASSN ---- 5 0 . �1 � �,�.�_�.._.___-._-- --- - --- 1T6.81 CITY HENDOTA HE3GH7S 176..$1 *. 60.95 BETTY ANDERSON ..._--_--- 50 .95 *. _...___._. ___�-__..----------�------ 57.2� EDWIN�1 BURRDWS 57.2G *. _._... _ 51. 9 t� ---.-.--- -- Q A?R I CI A B U R O Y ------- ti si.9n *. 66.55 MARJORIE CHEESBRON 66.55 *' b1.90 SAILY;COUNTRYMAN De�.t � O�m; � � 20-Police 30-Fire 40-Code Enfc 5p d&Bridges ITEM DESCRIPT�_ON __., ,__._. SPRIN GS ' EXAM G LOL1E ELECTION SVCS TIRES /HTGIBA L DUAL FAC ED L ITES 70-Parks ( 80-Plannin� 90-Anim Coni CCOUN T1N0: g�NV. i-4330-490s5C�. 5� 1-4244-0.30-3� 1•422fl-b40..-1€3 -.1�� t! 1-433 ii-440.-2t3 tf1-4330-46Q-3G i 80X PERMiT#4518 L�1-3250-��DD-£�.0 i HTR/FUEL HOSES ' t11-430�5-0.50r5� 3�9 PARTSS ' L1-433Q-490r�i? . 34 1982 STATUTE S U1-4240-�2� - 2� , RENTAl, CH6 ROC RAKE a-42ti.3�-b��_7� FORD TRK RADIATOR..� __ U1-4330-4�63-3G� RUSSIAN �LIVE 74-�46U-943-t3i3 I � 1982ASSESSMENT _ __,, .. fl1-4221-Z 50-Sii 1982ASSESSMEf�T q1-4221-9 7�r 7Et 1982 ASSESSM£NT G1-4224-12�.-2i 1982 ASSESSHENT 15-4221-i350-6i3 REPLENISH .PETTY CASH._._ �.01,-1021-3.OD..-Qry 'PRIAM MARY EL EC I f31- 426 ES- PRI MIAARY ELEC __ _ i PRIMARY ELEC � ------ ; PRIMARY ELEC , ---...PRIMA_RY _ELEC__.---_._.__ �_.-.-----_ D1-42b1�-b40-1�i (�1-42b0-64).-1#i . ( e�1-426�-640-1C� .._�1-426D-64�-1L?_ L CHECK REGISTER . AMDUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV�. 61.90 * ' 61.85 �� v�Ll1CILLE CUR7IS� �^ PRIMARY ELEC 61.85 */ 48.75 �1ILFRED DE4IRER PRIMAR1f ELEC 48.75 *. 61.85 MARY � DDHt.RTY�y � PRIMARY ELEC 6�.85 *. 01-4260-641.-1J Ol- 4260-640 -1 � 01-426�-64Q-1L 22.50 EVELYN FISC##E�t �RIMARY ELEC A1-426ti-b4Q-1�7 22-.50.. *� �61.85 .�OAN M FRANK ^ PRIMARY ELEC 51.85 *- �l1-4264-64�-2U -- -. . .- - -- - - - -- -� - - � b6.55 RtfTFI GRUNKE PR3HARY ELEC 01-426D-64�-1fl 55..55 *. � 64.70 MARJORIE S KOEPKE PRIMARY ELEC 64..�7t7 * 83.45 NANCY KRUSE PRIMARY ELEC 83.4 5 +w � 57.23 � BEVERL1f LERMAN PRIMARY �LEC 57,2� *. 83,45 RITA MACZKO PRIMARY ELEC 83.45 *� 52.50 NUBERT MEIER � PRIMARY ELEC 52.5D *, fl1-426i3-640.-3� 41-425t3-b4�-1� ^1-426L�-64D� �J O1-426i�-64�-1� 1?1-4260-b4D,-1� 60�.95 B£TTY MOEW PRiHMARY ELEC 01-�26D-64a-2fl b0..95 * '6p.95 ��^ EILEEN�E MULLEN � T PRIMARY ELEC 60,95 * d 1-426Q�-64� -1G ' 28.15 MARIIYN NELSON PRIMARY cLEC O1-426�-64�Jr.10 28.15 *� 46.85 JOSEPI�INE RRUSE PRIMARY tL�C 46.85 * 68.45 ANNABEL RANDOLPH PRIMARY ELEC 68..45 *� -- ------•--_..______._....._�.___._-_�------ - �-- ---- --- -�--------- --- ----------- — - 61.85 TNERESA R�DDING PRIAMARY EI.EC 61.R5 *� 31.9t# ARVID E RUED PRIMARY cLEC 31.9:� * � .__._. ...... _......_____.__..- -- ,.___. _ fl 1-4260-64J -I�1 R1-a260-64J.-1lI D 1-426Q-64D -1 �i 01-4260-643,-10 ------ -. ..--- ----- - --- �_ _� _ �_ � AMDUNT CHECK REGISTER � VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV oA1NF H RUSFRT PR IMA RY ELEC , � 1� 42b0-64� �1 tl 64.7� * � � _ 30.��1 __ MARY SHAU6HNESSY PRIMARY ELEC, __+_ ._._ U1-426Cl-64Q-i0 30 . ii �.. *� fi0�.95 __.Y�R�� N� A SIMEK PR�RY E E _-426D-64 .r� 3i� 6Q.95 *, b!?.95 JOAN N SMITH PRIMARY ELEC 01-426n-54�-iCs - --� --- - --- -� - - -- _ - -- .. _ .. --- -- --..__�....-- --- - � 64.95 *, -- _-._ 27.20 . D�OROT�iY._„TRO�LTZ�CH ._ PRIMARY EL�C �-42fD-64�-1G 27.2D *, 63.75 _ . MARILYIV VAN Z7L PRIMARY ELEC_____, ____, ._ _ ti1-426fl-640-1C� �53.75- */ - , _______5i3.95 JUl1E__R �iAGlVER __ _ PR2MARY ELEC,_,_ 1-426�-64�_-1,.�__ b4�.95 * � 30.Oi3 MARGARET M WALTER PRIMARY EL£C 01-426t1-64�-1ii 30.6t�.. *� --...._.._ ... _ . _ 28.15 _LAURZE_ WEINZETTEL u PRIHARY _LEC � 1-426�-b4D�-2�_ 28.15 * � 56.25 LAURITA .i�EINZETTEL PRIMMARY ELEC O1-�+26�-640-1U 56.25 * . .. ^� . l�bt?5,98'" STATE 7RE:4S 3RD GliR SUR CHGS ' �1-4447-1i�-1Q . �1 r 6Q �.98 #� --._.�._--- . �---- ----------------- ------ -- -- I 9.24 OIANE i�ARD MI �`�GG DI-4415-64a-It; 6.82 DIANE WARD � p1Z s9Es sr�ny , 15-4415-477-6C 16.��6 *� 213.�0 v� HAMELE RECREATION FIELD AMARKER 01-430�5-ti70-7G 213.p0 *� � -� - - - � 1DQ.3� AIR C�MM INC RAOIORPRS � J1-433D-45�r,2G '42.�0 � v AIR COMM INC � T OCYT SVC CONTR 01-433t1-45D-2u 142.1 U * / - - r-_. _. _. _ _. ._ _.__ -- -____ �� !�8�_---__�__8& J.__A UT 0.---SPL Y .- . 8.31 8&J AUTO SP�Y 2�J.38 ' 8&J AUTO SPL� 58.57 *� MMISC PARTS MUDLAMPS U1�'►JJil�!t�U��1J� 01-4330-46�r3G : J1-433D-46�-3G , - ..._ . __. ...--�-- - -- - _ . � .. . - - - -- - - - - - .._.. -•- --.._. ._. ---�-----_.._._ --- -t---_.... _.. - - _._._.. ��; . __, �.......�..�,_.�„r.....,. ...F....� „ CHECK RE�ISTER �MDt�NT VENDOR , ITEM DESCRI�'TION , __,��,976.16 .._._Bp �A T�R. COHMISSION RAIS� _H�'DR 82-1 . 1o9fi6�26 *. ,� 38.� �: CHAPi N PUSLI SH�NG �0 REQ F{�R PROPOSALS 3#3�3 � , t � ,�, i5.��.._. ._. _.--_...- CITY HOTOR St1£'P�Y__ .. �� S£1.44 CITY MOTOR SUPf�L�f _�� 22.14 C27Y hIOTOR_ SUP�L� ' 117..5 8 * �, .� 4.82 COASF TO COAST � �,,��_ 12..24 �_CUAS7�T0_GDAST�,� 3.7,i� 6 � .. - 19 i,83+�i C3 ; 0 .L O � �i +J �Si ��"� DA°NLGREN tiOiiARD ASSO RC}TER S _-_ --•---- .. _ - _ _ ...._ M I SC PA R TS '; ACGOUf�i N0. INY. �?2-4240—i2J-3.G12 �3-433€3-4#0-2I� 2 �1-433t1—�t40-2�i 1 rt�a��cn_a��t=�n � PAZNi/7R�E iiRAP GI-43�;:�—�7D-7t} 3 A11T0 DIGITAL CLOCK t31-433ti-44�.-2�` 3 , � SEPT RETA3IVER � l�1-4221-135-8�. . _. __ _... . .l �,�Fs ��iv��i..s{�� ,��r��s �. - �"i�- ��Yc 4 �.84 DAtVIELSON JAMES E Mi RESURRECTZON � __�-- 13.2t}. DANIEi.SOfV JAH£S E _ MI 8124-9128 ' 23.42 DA�ViELSON JAMES E MI 8/24-9l2B 4�.92 *�. � ._ _% 76 2.5 0___..._---.-_--D C R. C 0 R P.--------- ---- 0 CT R'�N T �� 1,1��.�Q OCR C.ORP. t?C7 RENT 2•867.54 +� ._.._.---- 9Q.aClt3 _DEN(11?S DE�.MOHT _OCT NtI _ 9Q.0� * i .. - ----. . . - -� - — - _. _ ... _ ___ __ __. .. .- - � 1i5.�p Jt3HNSG?N t}RVIL OCT M.I ' --_...1�'S�.� 0 * ..,G._.�._�_____...._. _..__---------.._._. . 6 6 ._. _... _. 31.��J. KISHEL EONARO KISHEL EDWARQ ---_..._ -� _ _.___.�_------ -- -- �1-2225—��3�—�� fll•2325—O.pJ-�i; 35-44i5—it75-l� �a-��i �-�o�-� r� i t�.1_ �t20.ti-bQO_• 14._1_ C5-42DA-6t3�.-15 � L7.;�...-�...�o t11-441�—ii3-1{� � MI CQLON PUO --4.Y� .. �1-2125-0 U�J -0 u MI 911-9l22 � t35—+�415-1U5-15 ....--.--__.______�_._._-------__.._.___.._.....�__.__ ..__..__..__.___._...---._._._._.___.�. jAMOUNT_ __.. � .66 _ .b6 � S M�� 2a.s6 * � 38.72 5.72 31.68 , -- . 9.9i3 _ 8 9..54 *.- CHECK REGISTER „ UENOQR KISFiEL £DtiARO KISHE� EDWARD KZSHEL ECIi�ARO �UT�i T OM KNUTH TOM KNt)TN fi0M KNUTH TOM ftlVUTh 70M 1�J S.� � . . _ LEIS 10 8.0 9 *.- 42.38 23_.1� 2��M�Y. 28.5av. 3�.59 28�.5Q 1�}.6i� 17�+25 *. 78.59 20 «4� 35.2 8 9.96 2.60 44rI?7 5{3.53 .7Q 15.22 ... 237.25 *� ' - _�__-__ :r 1 35.�� 15.'J U * i M/A ASSOCIATES INC M�A ASSOCIATES INC MIA ASSOCiATES INC M/A ASSO�iATES ZNC M.�A�ASSi3CIAT�S INC M/A ASSOCIATES INC MIA A�SOCIAT�S INC M&ii I NC CANON PRf3D MB�N i 11C CANON PROD M& � I NC CA N(}N PftflD 1N&i� SNC CANON �R�D T!&i� I NC CANON PR�t.O .�_ I AC_ CA I,10l� PRpD M&1� I NC GANON �'ROD H&t� I NC CA N�N PRQD M841 INC CANDN PROD N�END HGTS RUBBZSN � _� ..�__.T..._ ._. _._._. .�� . _ _ I�µ?Qi3.Q� � � METRO �tASiE C�NTROI. - 17.�0.- METRO 1iASiE CONTRi�L r�4Q..52 METR{} �iASTE CONTROL 24•523.52 �' ITEM__DESCRIP_TION_:. ,. ..._„ AGCOUNT NQ. I MI 9f1-9�22 ' 62-4415-935-� ._ H3 9/1-9.f21 63-�4I5-8�.03•I� MI 911-9121 78-�t415-6£t2-0 MI 9/6-9/29 MI 9/6-9/29 j MI 9�b-9l29 MI 9/6•9,�29 NI I 916- 9I29~-- __ .__._ _..__ ,. Lt � "'"9'Fl �� l�IJ � � � 63- 4415-803-{l b3-#�15-8'04�-G 78-4a15.-801-C+ 79-4#15-802-L� OCT OUES.--.--- ---_...._____..._. .�._ �1-2075-G,OOr^ WINOSt�IELD NASNER 1�Z NDS HIELD , �tANSNER,. NAND TqWELS ' HAND .TOWELS � Sii NLISt�IELt3 1iASH�R HAND TQ1dELS I, i�ZNDSHZELt3 �1ASHEft TONER/MTCN CANON i, 70NERlMTCN CANpN � TONER�MTCN CANON ': TDNERIMTCN CANON � 30iV�RlMT.CN CANON TONERJM'��N CANqN i'ONERlMTCN CANON ' TONER/MTCN CANqN I 70NER/MTCN CANON }- SE PT SYC ' � _. -- - --_ ..___�._. _ � SEPT SAC CHi� S 1 X ADMIN F�E tlC T I NS T �J1-43�.5-02Q-2 � 1- 43i�.5- �3 5d - 5 Q1-43�.5-0�0-5 Yl�TJ�<��Y7i7.� 7 �I2-43U.5�D7D.r7 15-43�.5-060-b 1�=�3it.5-� 60.-6 1:��"TZiJ4Y�D.1.�..�111 � 41-42D.�J-610-2i1 ' t31-4200-b2(}-30 ' O:I-420�?-6I�-St? ' Y.M '� J V W�� T V ai T iF � O.�l-43f�;fJ-54f�-1t3 ' �5-423�3-b3J-25 ' 1Q-42QA-A.OD-�Jf� � Z3-4ZD t�-9 i?t�-� t� t} 1-428ti-3I.5- 3 t�1-444$=1i�-1� 15-3320-�G�: G� 1�-44�+9-�3 6�-b� CNE^CK REGISTER AMOt1NT VEN0032 ._ IT�M_ DESCRiF.TION_. ACC�lll�tT N0. I`i`� ____.__ 27.7'5 HIN�i BENEFIT__ASSN OG7 RREM .._.__�1-2074-,� t�. ,�y 10.�30 MINN BENEFIT ASSN OCT PREM R1-2i375-)07rGv" 37.75 �- 4fl..?5 MZNN DE�'T Q� REV SPEC FUEL. 3AX AUG ill-�32t1-05�J-50 4D.75 * 69.'J9 MOiDR PARiS SERVIC�. RPRSIAdRTS *� Oi-�33i3-497 - St3 .. , _. . -- -_ ....-----....__._ .. __._____..__._.---___. ... _.---_..___. __.._..___. �.. _ 4�.73 NORTH{iESTERN BE�L SEPT SVC t?1-4210-i3.30.-3►..: 37.�7 NORT}i1�ESTERN BEl.L SEPT SVC 02-422�1-0.�0-5� 3T.77 NDRT1�ifESTERN BELI. S�PT SVC �i-421.0-07�-70 _� 37.77 � NORT#�IiESTERN B��i. SEPT SVC IS-�2i�-aS�,-i6�i 162.`a 4 *- 2�5�.��: DAK CRES7 KENNEl.S R�TAINERtCA�l.�___ t12-4�22 -8�..�-"'4 120�3.0 ' l3AK CREST KENNELS BpARD 01-4225-BOa ! 325.� � *r 35�3�.�i3 PEAT-t�AR4�ICK-MI7C��L. Ai10IT FE£S �3-422tl-130-£3>'_ 3��tI+Q.30 �'EAT-�1AR�I�CK-MITCHEL AUQIT FEES 14-422t4-s�t�D-Ofl 1, OQ U.J,O PEAT- M�,RNI CK-MI TCHEL AUDIT �t �S 15-422U-� b1.- 6C� 15G,.��.__ _.__.__... .. _._�'EAT-_MARNICK-Mi7Ci•iEL_.._,_ _ AUDI,T FEES__..__...__.__._..____._ . 21"4220-;1_D�_-0� 125.O.i� �PEAT�-l1aRWICK-MI?CHEI. AUDIT FEES ?8-4220-801-�0 3.25.�� . PEA�-MARiiICK-t�ITCHEI. Aili3IT FEES 7�•422t3-8fl2-qil __�., 125.�<�3 P£AT-.MAR�ICK-�lITCNEL AUDiT FEES �,,,.Bf�-422D-805-t3� 125�� Q FEAT-MARNICK-�lITCHEl. AUDIi FEES Si-�i22ti-BD6-�,fl 5�OQC3.3Q *� r "�7.�2 �INE � BEND PAVIN� INC �INE MIX� q1-4422-OSf1-5i} 325.70 PINE BENO PAVINC INC FINE MiX 15-4422-4.8p,r6%. 20 2.72 * � __._ .__ 2:. 8 4_._.._ _.�__.�. S 8 T_�i I F F_I C E__P' R 4 D.._.�__.�.�� A M PA D S .__.�.�"� �"�.�..A�'_�4.: 12.38 SS�T QFFICE Pft00 LIOUID PAPER 01-430,�1-110-1£� 15.22 *! � - - .___... -�-.3 5 . � t1 _�.,.__..------_-_ S E !w A N 0 E R_.._ D U A N E--- � - -- —__ _____.. _ 0 � T _M I _.. ---------------. _..�...__ � � .� 4 415 - 2 01- 7. �?_ CHECK RE6ISTER _AMOUNT_ _ _ _ _ _ _, _ . . VENDOR 35��,D.. * Y ITEM _DESCRZPTION ._..___,.�..__ACCOUNT_N0.__i 1�310._�.0___.___ SHAUGHNESSIf L� JR SE,PT_SVC__. __ __.__,.T__ . Oi-4220-132-1 1�31D.Q0 *� 83.25 SISNAL CAR �iASH 83.25 *� 1 � 761.18 l�lifl.92 44�.90 15.50 48.61 192.89 111.95 133.92 1b0..16 249.48 --- �71.92 _--- 4 s 30 4.4 3 ST TREAS PERA ST TREAS P.ERA _ _ _ ST _TREAS PERA_ ST �TREA3 PERA ST• TRE�1S PERA " ST°TREAS PERA ST TREAS PERA ST TREAS PERA _ ST TREAS PERA ST TREAS PERA ST TREAS PERA 2�i335,22 - 56.2 8" ,_ i18�.43 492.54 254�9i 322.t? 6_._ 6i8.11 163.89 4�l►72..9�4 �� 33�.58 33.58 +�' 3RD QTR PLUS SEPT fl1-443i3-3 2� - 2 QERA N/}� 9/17 PR ��-2�62-�.00-Q.�J PERA CONTR 9/1�.-T. PR fli-44Q.6-02D-2� PERA CONTR �1.:1F7 PR �1-44�.b-J.21-2t� - - - - --- ------ -- ---...---- --. __._. .__ --- - - - --- -- ---- . _ _._ PERA CONTR 91,1;7 �Pi� 01-44fl,b-D.3Q-30 PEfiA CONTR > 911� Pit a1-.44Q.b-0_40 -40 P£R�1 CONTR`9�I17 AR 03=44�7;6-75Qr�� PERA CONTR 911� PR . 01-44?,5-��J.-7U PERA CONTR 9/17 AR 01-440.b-110.-1U __PERA .CON_�R 9_/17__PR _,, __0_1-�4L1.b-11D-1.0 PEfiA CONTFt 911T PR �5-44U.b-�R5-15 PERA CONTR 9/17 PR 1.5-4413.b-3bti-6L� � ST TREA'S SS C�9N FUND ST TREAS SS CON FtiND ST TR£AS SS� CON FUND. St TREAS SS CON FUND ST TREAS SS CON FUNO _ __ __ST TREAS SS_ CON FUND_ ST TR EAS 8S CQN FUND ST iREAS SS CON FUND F�CA 1JlH'SEPT � FICA CONTR SEPT f FICA CONTR SEPT ` FICA CONTR SEPT , FZCA CONTR SEPT i FICA CONTR SEPT �iC�1 CONTR SEPT� FFCA CON7R SEPT ; ._ . - fJ1-2063-ODDa�D 0 i-�t4Q.8-D.2i- 2� 43.-4�t3�8-D �0-4D 01-440�8-� 5D-50 �i1-44��.8-� 7t3-7D _... ._ �1-44d 8-i lU_-10 G5-�4D..:,9-105-15 15- 44D.8- 7.b0 .- 60 SUN NEI�SPAPERS NOT PUB HEAR 81-8 R 7T-4240-951-D.D � , s _105.�0_ ___ T41IN CITY TESiING SLUOGE ,SA_MPLE_TEST__.__,,. I._ 15-4330-4QD.-6��2 lE� 5.1.Q.. : /"�-- - - 109.4Q UNITED WAY-ST �PAUL OCT C ONTR 109.4i1 * , _ ..,.__._._ .._�__.--...___...____._____---.____.,-- - - � � al-2d70-0.00-►3� CHECK RE6ISTER AMOUNT _ VENDOR _._ _ ._ ITEM DESCRIP_TION _______ . _..__. . . ACCOUNT N0. I.IV1F: .,,.._.._____ 7.�5 _ VIK3NG INDUSTRiAI C�' TUBE . ,�1-44D.3-J�.30. ��: 7.45 * � 98.52 YASH NATI�DNAL INS CO OCT INS ii/H 01-20T4•tiAD-��. 22A..�0.� WASN: NATIONAL INS. CO3 OCT. INS � PREH 03�=4245-329:r20.. 158.73 wASH NATIONAL INS CO OCT INS PREM U1-42�5-121-2t1 110.�0 �iASH I�ATIONAL INS CO OCT INS PREM D2-4245-Q.40-40 48.73_._, _._ ______WASii _NATIONAI _INS_C�_.�_._ OCT INS PREMT_.___._ _,_. _.._01-�245-0,50-.5:0_ ll�.flQ WASH NATIONA� INS Ca OCT iNS PREM D1-4245-11�-2D.. 11fl..�0.� WASH NATIONAL INS CO OCT INS .PREM 05-4245-105-1� ,__�_ 855.98" *� -- --------�---...-- - � -...__--- -----�-------�--------_.___----------- _ -._---�-----....___.--�--- --.___-------- 103.�9 �ELLS FARGO TRUSTEE OCT LTD iiJH O1-2D74-O:OD-DG_ 32.99 �ELLS FARGO TRUSTEE, OCT PREM D1-4245-D20-20. __ 26.�3. r 1�Ei:lS' fARGO 'TRUSTEE`. OCT PR�M 01-`424b-3:5��5D. i8.89 �iELLS FARGO TRUSTEE OC7 PREM 0.1-4246-�_7J-�0., I81 .50 *% 21�5b1,71 FUNO O1 TOTAL 35�1.� �l FUNO 03 T4TAl 2�16�.84 FUND 05 TOTAI .70 FUND 10. TOTAl. 3�Jfl�3.a� FUND la TOTAL ._ _. ....... --- - - - --- __ - --- - - _ ..._..------- - -- --- - -- �- ._.._. .. . .. 24�382.�,6 FIfND 15 TOTAI , 15q.'�A FUND 2i TOTAL __ 15.22 FUND 23 TDT.AL .6 6 FUN Q 62 TO T AL 45.10 FUNO 63 TOTAL 33.� 0 FUND 74 TOTAL -- - -- - - - --. _---... _... _. - - -------- ___-- -- -----�------.__._._..____ -- ---._._._..__..._ ._..--...__.�. ._------- 33.58 FUNO 77 TOTA� 2�I58.14 FUND 78 TOTAL 134.�D FIiND 79 TOTAL 125.L� D FUNO 8J TOTAI. � 125.? 0 FUND 81 TOTAI . _ .W...._.. . --- ----- -•- - - . - _ ___ _ __ _ __ ___ .. .- -- -�- �-- -- . - - . . ._. ..---- 54,275.91 70TAL MANUAL CHECKS 10139 200.00 Dak Cty St Bank Payroll Deductinns 9/17 10140 555.00 St Cap Cr�Union " _ 10141.___ _ 4 , 848,_45,- --.. Dir Int Re�enue _ _ _...EI.T_W/.H 9/17 -----.--.�_---._._._.._..__ .__.__.___..-- --_._..- -- -_ -_. _. , 10142 19,895.43 City Nffi Pr Acct Net Payroll 9/17 _- - -----__---. _25.r•4g8...88r_------�---- $ 79,774.79 GRAND TOTA1'� CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES FOR CITX COUNCIL APPROVAL - OCTOBER 5TH, 1982 Bowler Company Robert Arendt Construction Dennis Cons�ruction Company LandTech Corporation Western Remadelers Bowler Company Gas Piping License General Contractor's License General Contractor's License General Contractar's License General Contractor's Licen�e Hea�ing and Air Conditioning License r�F�to DATE: �eptember 28, 1982 TO: City Council "�O:�i: Paul R. Berg Code Enfarcemen�. Oz"Licer �;,�3��CT: Buildi.nq :1c�ivity Rec�.,rt ic.sr September, 1982 CURRE£3T :�i�Jc7i`ii Y�.AR T� llATE - 1982 `I0. V�LU ;TION FFL C(7LI LC�'ELi ,•:O. �TALUATION FE� COLLECTED B:.DG PFi��?w i'� � � --- I ___. _ S=D 3 $ 288,671.63 $2,Q88.90 1 32 $3,187,951.33 $22,479.92 C%I 2 1,195,2Z5.00 5,489.55 � 20 3,8Q8,565.00 17,948.35 :�t�SC. i5 116,714,96 618.d9 126 721,854.12 7,`503.36 S�b Tota? 20 $1,6Q0,6Q1.59 $8,196.54 178 $7,718,370.45 $4?,933..63 _•�r� ��an1IT5 �`' ?lbq � $ 91.00 44 $ 1,127.00 t•F�r Z 10.00 45 300.00 Swr 1 17.50 37 647.50 � �''..y � F�� & Gas Pi^e � �..�._ 328.50�.� � 63 5,3d6.50� S� Total 16 $ 447.00 189 $?,381..00 �ICEA��ING Co~:�ractar' s Licenses �� $ 400•Od j 21I $ 5,275.00 � `I'{1T�L _ ��_ _—..__ � � 52 __ $1,6Q0,601.59 - $9,043,54 - --� - 578 ! $7,718,370.45 $60,587.63 YE:iR TO DKTE - 19�. NO. Vr'1L(it�TZON Fr.�: COi,L£C';"EL} 3S $2,639,754.47 $23,332.84 10 3,16$,805.82 14,693.09 146 ' 803,167.69 16,034.73 191 $6,617.,727,98 $54,060.66 4$ 40 44 68 200 � 198 589 $6,611,727.98 $ 1,023.00 308.Q0 769.00 2,898.50 $ 4,998.50 $ 4,50Q.00 $63,559.16 tiOTE: Al2 zee amaunts exclude Sac, taac and Sta�.e Surcharge. Amounts shoc•�n will reflect only permit, plan check fee and valuatian amounts. � , I. NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION , c/o City offices —I' MendotahHefght DM nnesofa 55120 NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FULL COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 15, 1982 ; The meeting was called to order by Chairman Dave Zemke at 7:35 p.�n. The following Directors were present: � Baird- Sunfish Lake Boelter- Mendota Hanson- West St. Paul Kinney- South St. Paul Harrison- Sunfish Lake EXCUSED ABSENT: Witt- Mendota Henderson- Inver Grove Heights Lanegran- South t. Paul Tatone- Inver rove Heights Walker- West S . Paul Zemke- Mendot Heights Bruestle- Mendot UNEXCUSED ABSENT: Beaird- Lilyda e Goad- Lilyda e Also present were Anita Benda, technical consultant, Adrian Herbs , legal consultant, Nelsene Karns, Group W Cable, Brad Anderson, Viacom C blevi.sion , Dick Joyce, Tribune Cable, Carol Woldsindt, Storer Cable, Jane Br mer, Storer � Cable, Deb Schultz, Crawford & Anderson, and Jane Salen, staff se retary. II. Dave Zemke added on the agenda for September 15, 1982 under VI O�ership Committee Report, item VIa, System Committee Report of September , 1982. Motion by Hanson to accept the agenda of September 15, 1982I se Harrison. Motion carried unanimously. f III. Harrison motioned to accept the minutes of September l, 1982, sec nde Hanson. Motion car'ried unanimously. I IV. A check for �22.50 was received from Brad Anderson,Viacom Cablevi ion cover the NDC 4's minutes for September, October and Novem�er. MCCB sent their minutes from September 10, 1982. I t I by : . , to A letter sent from the City of Mendota Heights confirming the res gnation of James Losleben from the NDC 4 and the appointment of Liz�Witt o NDC 4. V. Programming and Services Committee Report. , i Lanegran moves to accept the Programming and Services minutes of 8, 1982, seconded by Walker. Motion carried unanimously. ; Zemke mentioned to add on the minutes of the Programming and Servi ces Committee meeting of September 8, 1982 a reference to Anita Benda's memo of August 4, 1982, Cable Issues: Programming, Services & Institutions. ' A,motion was made by Hanson to accept the policy recommendations rom the Programming and Services Committee meeting of September 8, 1982. econded by Baird, Bruestle abstained. Aye: unanimous. � VI. vza. �� _2_ Anita Benda discussed the policy recommendations of the Programming and Services Committee meetinq crf September 8, 1982. -.� Baird maved that under F.2. AccesS Support (��) makes.use of existinq productian facilities in the area, be deleted, Seconded by Ta�one. Motion carri.ed unanimously. Lanegran made a motian that on F.2 Access Support we re-order the lettering. c�� will change to �c and g will change to ii. On e and f, Anita wil]. make as a separate statement. Seconded by Hanson. Motion carried unanimously, Tatone mac2e a motion to correct on F.2. Access Support in sentence 3,centers should read center. Seconded by Baircl. Motian carriecl unanimausly. Tatone made a motian to include private high schools in the sentence; Applicants be requirecl to proposa a system desiqn that pravides Inver Hills Community College and all high schools'with p�rmanent capability to transmit ].ive vicleo programming on either a subscriber or institutional network(K. Insti- tutiona2 Service). Seconded by Hansan. Mation carried unanimousl.y. Ownership Committee'Repor�. On the minutes o� the RE"P/Preliminary Ordinance Committee meeting of September 9, 19$2, Paul Ta�.one mentioned typographical errors. Also, to change the name of John Henderson to the correct name of Ken Henderson. There were errors in the amounts of the performance bands, change to read from $500.d0 ta $50Q,04Q.OQ and �.he liability insurance from $2,000.00 ta S2,OOO,OOO.QO. Paul Ta�.one then made a motion ta accep� the amended minutes ot �.he RFPf Preliminary Ordinance Committee meeting of Sep�ember 9, 1982• Secondecl by Baird. Motian �arried unanimously. Adrian Harbst reported an the RFP/Preliminary Ordinance. Paul Ta�.one made a mo�.ion under Ftevocation #6 �o add the word re-newal. Changi.ng the sentence ta read: fihe company materially misrepresents a fact in the application for a re-newal negotiation of the franchise. Seconded by Boelter. Moti�n carried unanimou�ly. System Committee Report of September 2, 1982. Lanegran made a motion to approve the SXstem Committee members recommendaticans on September 2, I982 as palicy recammandatians. Seconded by Hansan. Mation carried unanimausly. Anita Benda discussed the policy recommendations of the System Committee Repar� af September 2, 1982. Tatane made a motion to delete under A.Rates #l. Applicants be required ta propose discaunted service rates for senior citizens and the handicapped. Aye: Tatone, Hansan, Zemke, Walker, Baird, Baelter, Harrison, Lanegran, Kinney, Nay: Bruestle Lanegran made a motion on D.3 to add the ward calendar. The sentence should read: The franchise contain a provision requiring the Grantee to act on complaints within 24 haurs and to resoJ.ve them within 7 calendar clays. Aye: unanimous. ��tian carries. � .. :. � NDC 4 Full Commission Meeting Minutes September 15, 1982 Page three VII. Report by Consultant and Counsel. Adrian Herbst listed a number of topics that should be reviewed by Commission. The following topics are: l. Administration 2. Reserve Fund 3. Franchise Fees 4. Local Ownership 5. Municipal vs Private Ownership 6. Institutional Network 7. Process to follow after recommendations 8. Pornagraphic Material 9. Rates- uniformity 10. Local Investors 11. Form of Documents 12. Prevailing wage and rate for two TV's the Tatone made a motion that Adrian Herbst and Anita Benda prepare a utline of the above policy issues. Seconded by Baird. Motion carried unan mously. VIII. Other Business IX. � In the memorandum from Adrian Herbst on Commission Insurance, Jame King and Associates was recommended by Herbst, Zemke and Kinney. Tatone abstained from voting because his office is located next King and Associates. � Aye: unanimous. Motion carries. Report of Officers The City Administrators met over breakfast on Wednesday, with Anita Benda and Dave Zemke. I I On September 14, 1982, Anita Benda met with the City Educators at Square in South St. Paul. ; ( Tatone heard from the Inver Grove Heights Fire Department replyin intended to have a meeting and a proposal ready by Septembei 20, Craig Kinney will be attending the FBI Academy in Washington, D.0 September 29, 1982 until approximately January 4, 1982. ' Dave Zemke has assigned Vice-Chairman Paul Tatone as actingltre Craig Kinney's absence. � Treasure's Report Balance:: $ 11,682.74 Recieved: 3,000.00 from Mendota Heights final budget paymen 23.50 check for minutes from Viacom Cablevisio: Bills: 1,502.21 Anita Benda technical consultant service . 307.65 Herbst & Thue legal services Tatone made a motion to pay these bills, seconded by Hanson. Mot' unanimously.-� - James 15, 1982 :entral that they a82. f Y'o�n. -e in carried p y.,. �� IX. Boelter made a motion that the Ownership Committee meeting scheduled � for September 20, 1982 be changed to September 29, 1982 at 6:30 p.m. The meeting will be held in the conference room at the Mendota Heights City Hall. Seconded by Baird. Motion carried unanimously. Tatone made a motion that Adrian Herbst and Anita Benda put together a summary of the policy recommendations. Seconded by Baird. Motion carried unanimously. X. No presentations from interested members of the public. XI. Tatone made a motion to adjourn at 11:10 p.m., seconded by Boelter. Motion carried unanimously. Prepared by: Jane Salen staff secretary 1 NORTNERN DAKUTA COI�NTY CABLE . COMMUNICATIONS CQMMISSION ' , � c/a City Offices ; 750 South Plt�za Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 ' NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSIONi FIJLL G{}MMISSiON MEE`.�II�IG SEPTEMBER 29, 1982 7:30 P.M.. AGENDA 0 I. Roll Call. II. Agenda and Amendments thereta approved by a majority af those present and vo�ing. , II2. Approval of the Minutes of the September 15, 1982 meeting. ItJ. Recital regardi.ng communications to the Board. � v. Ownership Cammi.ttea Report. t1I. i2eview of Poiicy Decisians. : 4 VIS. Other Business. �� VIII. Report of Officers. . i IX. Presentati.ons by interes'Ged members of the pub7.ic at the meet wishing ta be heard on matters not included on thc� Agenda. X. Adjournment. ! NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION , c/o City Offices —T Mendota He ght DrM nnesota 55120 NDC4 Ownership, RFP and Franchise Committee Minutes - September 29, 1982 I The NDC4 Ownership, RFP and Franchise Committee meeting was called to rder by Chairman Paul Tatone at 6:30 p.m. The following members were presen : Tatone, Baird, Boelter, Hanson, Witt. Also present: Adrian Herbst. Herbst advised the Commi:ttee that in his opinion, as embodied in his me orandum of September 23, 1982, there are serious constitutional problems involv d in a flat policy against "rent-a-citizen" investors, pointing out that as of this � time the Commission has not adopted any policy on local investors, nor, for that matter, on lobbyists�• either. It might seem that these two items are 1'nked. Thereupon, on a motion made by Boelter and seconded by Hanson the�follo ing recommendations were unanimously adopted. The Committee recommends tha the Commission: ; Alternatives A. Reject all proposals of applicants which include a financ'al structure whereby the percentage of stock held by local i vestors is greater than the percentage of d�llars actually invest d. B. Prohibit loans by applicants to local investors forithe i of buying applicant's stock. _ � C. Reject all proposals by applicants which have provided gu to "local investors" at little or no risk. � � D. Reject all proposals of applicants which provide that the of local owners can be bought out readily or at a guarant E. Local investors file with the Commission a sworn stitemen their total financial arrangements with the applicant. (T form will be worked out in detail by Adrian Herbst.j i rpose rantees interests ed price. showing e actual Consideration was then given to the matter of distribution of thejfranc ise documents. Upon motion made by Hanson and seconded by Boelter the following resolu ion was unanimously adopted: f The Committee recommends that the franchise documents (RFP, : ordinance, contract and needs assessment) be supplied to the l. All potential applicants 2. All �ity offices 3. MCCB 4. All Commission members and the consultant and attorney. �eliminary ;ollowing: � -a- The following recommendation was then moved by Hanson, seconded by Witt, and unanimously adopted: The required public notice of the availability of the RFP shall be published once in the following publications: 1. The St. Paul Dispatch; The St. Paul Pioneer Press 2. Cablevision; Broadcasting; Multi-Channel News 3. The Sun The following recommendation about application fees was then moved by Boelter, seconded by Witt and unanimously adopted: Application Procedures A. Expenses 1. Each applicant shall submit with its proposal a fee of $8,000.00 to cover the estimated costs of analysis of his proposal. Any ` unused portion of this fee will be returned to the applicant; 2. The RFP shall contain a statement that the successful applicant will be obligated to reimburse the Commission and cities for all other costs of franchising through an award fee; 3. The RFP will include an estimate of the award fee referenced in (2) for the applicants to use in desi�ning their financial plans in the proposals. This estimate will be based on the total fee estimates from the consultant, staff, attorney, publications, advisory committee and other city costs; , 4. The Commission shall direct the consultant, attorney, staff and each city to submit estimates of their anticipated costs to the Commission for purposes.of determining the total award fee estimate. With reference to a provision for.a deadline for submission of applications, it was moved by Witt, seconded by Baird •arid tinanimously adopted that the following recommendation, be made : Applicants shall be allowed 90 days from the date that the RFP is issued and distributed to submit their proposals. The Committee then turned its attention to item "C" on pages 2 and 3 of the Herbst memorandum of September 23, 1982, but discussion was ended by necessity to adjourn for the full Commission meeting scheduled for 7:30 p.m. By common consent it was agreed that the discussion on this item would continue at the next meeting of the Committee . On motion made, seconded and unanimously adopted, the meeting thereupon adjourned. NOTE: The next meeting of the Ownership Committee has been set for 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, October 6, 1982. The meeting will be held in the city office conference room. Prepared by: Duncan Baird NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION , � c/o City Offices 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 I. NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION SPECIAL FULL COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 29, 1982 ! The meeting was called to order by Chairman Dave Zemke at 7:40 p.m. The following Directors were present: � Baird- Sunfish Lake Boelter- Mendota Bruestle- Mendota Hanson- West St. Paul Walker- West St. Paul EXCUSED ABSENT: Henderson- Inver Grove Heights Kinney- South St. Paul Harrison- Sunfish Lake Lanegran- South St. Pai Witt- Mendota Heigt Tatone- Inver Grove F Zemke- Mendota Heigt UNEXCUSED ABSENT: Beaird- Lilydale Goad- Lilydale Also present were Anita Benda, technical consultant, Adrian Herbst, consultant, Nelsene Karns, Group W Cable, Norman Hendrickson,� Lilyd John Wadell, South-West Review, Rollin Crawford, Crawford and� Ander Dei� Schultz, Crawford and Anderson, and Jane Salen, staff secretary II. Anita Benda added on the agenda of;September 29, 1982 item VIa, Eva Criteria and Priorities under VI,�;Ownership Committee Report.� � i hts legal Motion by Harrison to accept the amended agenda of September 29, 19�2. Seconded by Witt, motion carried unanimously. j �Attorneys, III. On a request fpr.amendments or corrections to the minutes of �the Co ission meeting of September 15, 1982, Tatone requested that item VIa of th minutes be corrected by adding that his (Tatone) motion was duly seconded b Zemke. A further correction was requested to reflect the actual vote on th motion which was as follows: � Aye: Tatone, Zemke, Baird, Boelter, Harrison, Bruestle ; Nay: Hanson, Walker, Lanegran, Kinney � Also with respect to item VIa, Lanegran requested that the minutes f September 15, 1982 record a second by Tatone to her motion to amend item D(3) of the System Committee Members Report of September 9, 1982. ! Hanson moved to accept the amended minutes of September 15, 1982. was seconded by Witt, motion carried unanimously. ! IV. Recital regarding communications to the Board. A letter from the law offices of Stern, Levine, Schwartz, Lifson & advising that the city of Burnsville has submitted a request�to MC� CST to consist of Burnsville and Eagan. . s motion �eighton, to revise IV. � VI. -2- A letter to NDC4 from the United States Senator Rudy Boschwitz than•king � the Commission for contacting him concerning the 5.2172 issue. ' A letter sent from Bradley E. Anderson stating that Viacom Cablevision will not be submitting a proposal to NDC4. Ownership Committee Report. Lanegran made a motion that all materials of the Ownership, RFP and Franchise Committee meeting of September 29, 1982 be sent to all Directors and that discussion be deferred until the October 6, 1982 meeting. Harrison seconded that motion, motion unanimously carried. Review of Policy Recommendations. Reference Herbst memo of September 21, 1982. Adrian Herbst led a discussion on the policy recommendations made by the Commission and Committees to date. Item 17 deleted because the Commission previously acted to defer recommen- dation on local investor issue. Baird made a motion to adopt Adrian Herbst September 29, 1982 Clarification of Rate Increase Policy. Seconded by Lanegran, motion unani.mously carried. Lanegran made a motion to amend #113 B, adding "with proper lighting." The sentence should read; Has aclequate parking facilities with proper lighting. Seconded by Harrison, motion unanimously carried. Lanegran made a motion to amend #130 by taking out the word "private" in "private high schools" and substituting the word "non-public." Seconded by Harrison, motion unanimously carried. In the September 21, 1982 memorandum from Adrian Herbst, rates for additional TV outlets, Tatone made a motion on B, to leave out the second sentence. Also to change the first sentence by adding "applicants are requested to propose." The sentence should read; Applicants are requested to propose reduced rates for additional TV outlets in a home above and beyond the first TV outlet. Seconded by Baird, motion unanimously carried. Tatone made a motion to adopt the amended memorandum of September 21, 1982. Seconded by Lanegran, motion unanimously carried. VIa. Evaluation Criteria and Priorities. Lanegran made a motion to adopt the first three categories, Services, Technical and Engineering and Financial and Management. Lanegran also suggested in the motion under Financial Management to underscore the words "local ownership."Seconded by Baird, motion unanimously carried. Tatone made a motion to extend the meeting past 10:00p.m., Aye: Hanson, Zemke, Harrison, Tatone Nay: Baird, Boelter, Bruestle, Harrison, Lanegran, Witt, The meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. Prepared by: Jane Salen staff secretary seconded by Hanson. Walker NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION , c/o City Offices �750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 X. i NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FULL COMMISSION MEETING ' ' OCTOBER 6, 1982 � 7:30 P.M. AGENDA I Roll Call. i Agenda and Amendments thereto approved by a majority of those present and voting. � Approval of the Minutes of the September 29, 1982 special meet Recital regarding communications to the Board. Ownership Committee Report. Continue discussion of open issues. ! i Other Business. , Report of Officers. I t Presentations by interested members of the public at the meeti wishing to be heard on matters not included on the Agenda�. Adjournment. I � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 28, 1982 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission wasrcallec Chairperson Kruse at 8:05 o'clock P.M. The following members were preseY Morson, Butler, Burke, Stefani, Frank, and Blesener. Also present was P_ Consultant Howard Dahlgren and Public Works Director Jim Danielson. APPROVAL OF Minutes of the August 24th meeting had been�submii MINUTES agenda. Burke moved, seconded by Morson that the approved as submitted. Chairperson Kruse noted would like to see any minute corrections included set of minutes. Voting: all ayes. j to order by _. Kruse, inning ted with the minutes be that he in the following Minutes of the Special meeting held on September 5th had been mailed to the Commission members on September 20t . Butler moved, seconded by Stefani, that the minutes be a�roved as submitted. Voting: all ayes. �� HEARING, CASE #82-13, Chairperson Kruse called the meeting to order for COLON, CONDITIONAL continuing a public hearing from the August�24th USE PERMIT FOR application from Vern Colon for continued discuss PLANNED UNIT proposed townhouse project on Highway 13. { DEVELOPMENT � Mr. Colon was present and requested that the hear until the next meeting to allow time to respond t Dahlgren's memo and the memo prepared by City Eng � Chairperson Kruse wished to discuss the matter no� were many residents in attendance at the meeting Mr. Colon responded by no.ting that he reduced the in the project from 16 to 14, and addressed�the m spaces and the cul-de-sac turnaround diameter. l Planner Dahlgren noted that the plan does not hav� mental detail to continue the hearing. He stated should have a drainage plan, a topographical plan plan. Also needed would be a market analysis, an� schedule. 1 purpose of ing on an on his g be continued Planner eer Kishel. since there or the hearing. number of units tter of parking enough develop- hat the Commiss nd a landscape a construction Chairperson Kruse asked for questions from the Co ission members, noting that he had received considerable input fr m the neighbors in the last few weeks. He suggested that perhaps Mr. Colon had not met the needs of the neighbors and that�perha s a meeting with them might be feasible. { Chairperson Kruse asked for questions and comment from the audience. Mr. Jerry Shaughnessy, 527 Miriam, ask d about a timetable for the feasibility study. Public Work Director Danielson stated that it may take possibly anothe month or longer. Mr. Shaughnessy noted that he had trouble heating the lower portior� Planning Commission Minutes, September 28, 1982 Page Two of his home last winter due to a pileup of earth that blocked the drainage from his yard. He noted that he heats his home through the floor and that his heat ducts had become filled with water, thus not allowing any heat. He wondered when this matter would be cleared up and his drainage problem rectified. Chairperson Kruse noted that the audience, in responding, should state why they are for or against the project, not just that they are for or against it. He wanted their reasons why they felt as they did. Commission member Butler noted that she felt the Planning Commission was out of order as they had never approved a sketch plan and now they were being asked to approve a preliminary development plan. Mary Jean Bilski, 605 Winston Court, noted that she liked single family neighborhoods, that is why they moved into their present neighborhood. She does not like apartment-like structures and very little open space. She stated that if and when the time comes where she might move into a townhouse, she would go to the town- house, but that she definitely did not want a townhouse in her single family neighborhood. She also wondered if "need" is one of the qualifications to allow a piece of property to be changed. Mr. Ed Abrahamson, 1007 Downing, expressed concern over the safety of the neighborhood children regarding the holding pond and also questioned what happens to the water. Public Works Director Danielson responded that the holding ponds are normally dry and they only hold�rain water, draining slowly. He noted that they are generally about three feet deep, with a very shallow descent, and that they are usually not fenced. It was pointed out that a holding pond would be necessary for both a single family develop- ment or townhouse development. Mrs. Jean Tuohy, 1007 London Road, stated that the Ordinance requires 10 acres for a planned unit development and that they are now trying to squeeze a PUD onto 5.62 acres. She felt that townhouses would be a threat to existing single family home values. After further discussion, Blesener moved to close the public hearing at 9:2� and forward a recommendation to the City Council. Burke seconded the motion. Voting: all ayes. Blesener moved to recominend denial of the Planned Unit Development on the basis that it is incompabible with the existing single family development. 5tefani seconded the motion. Voting: all ayes. HEARING, CASE #82-14, Chairperson Kruse called the meeting to order for the purpose of GRYC, SUBDIVISON a continued public hearing from the August 24 meeting on an application by James Gryc for subdivision of his property, located west of Dodd Road, north of Par 3 Golf Course and one lot depth south of Wentworth Avenue. rlanning �ommission Minutes, September 28, 19�2 Page Three Public Works Direc�or Danielson advised the Commis � and Planning Consultant Dahlgren had conducted a m the affected neighbors on Sept�. 22, and that the a good, long meeting with a majority of the proper attending. Mr, Danielson gave a brief summary of noting that the property is proposed to be develop phases, from west to east. He noted that Mr. Klad a road on his property, and stated that there is e to move the road off the Kladis property and put i property. , aion that he aeting with meeting was :y owners :he meeting, �d in four Ls does not want iough room : on the Gryc Mr. Danielson noted that the development of TnTachtl r Road is of great concern, and that a connection is needed bet een Wentworth and Bachelor. He noted that it would be more desi eable to put Wachtler in from the north, rather than from the s uth. ; Commission member Morson commented on what would h ppen if 30 homes were put in and Wachtler was installed�. The homes would be on a 2200 foot deadend street. He suggested th t Evergreen Knoll be extended all the way across the property, rather than in four phases, and also to place the utilities i at one time, rather than in phases. � Mr. Leonard Horowitz, 1779 Trail Road, felt it wou d not be fair to extend Wachtler, as it would be too busy,�as is Trail Road presently. He was against making Trail Road�a tho oughfare. Mr. Terry Radatz and Mr. Peter Shepard both spoke gainst extending Wachtler through the property. Mr! Shep rd noted that there is very little day-time traffic, and tlie onl traffic on Trail Road now is in the evening hours when the pa k is open or when the golf course is open. , Mr. Ray Olmstead, 1743 Trail Road expressed con speeds and the amount of traffic which would!be Wachtler is extended. � Carolyn Verret, 724 Bachelor, noted that there is favor of Wachtler Road being extended, but that th against the extension of Wachtler Road. Virgil Ch W. Wentworth, is against Wachtler going past his h Jansky, 1373 Cherry Hill Road, noted that just bec platted does not necessarily mean they should go t The Planning Commission recommended that a report : Department and/or Fire Department should be availa subdivision. Mrs. Emily Slowinski, 806 Bachelor Avenue, wondere� could not be built thru the Lewis property from W� Dodd Road. There was a great deal of discussion a: place Wachtler Road. over excessive rated if petition in e will be one stofferson, 800 e. Mr. John se �eoads are ough. the Police on this why a road tworth to ut where to Commission member Frank spoke, as a resident, not a a commission member, advising that he had conducted his own surv y of Cherry Hill residents, and that he received 18 responses f om persons Planning Commission Minutes, September 28, 1972 Page Four who definitely did not want to see Wachtler extended. Mr. Gene Schway, representing Pa� 3 Golf Course, asked Mr. Gryc why he would choose to put a road in along the south side of his home, along the golf course property. Mr. Gryc said he had more room on that side, but he could put a road in on either side of his home. After further discussion, Butler moved to recommend approval of the preliminary plat of EverGreen Knolls, without constructing Wachtler Road from Wentworth to Bachelor. Morson seconded the motion. Morson noted that Wachtler would not be open from north to south, but a westerly exit from the development would need to be found by the developer. Voting: 2 ayes, Butler and Morson. 5 nays, Kruse, Stefani, Burke, Blesener, and Frank. The motion failed to pass. Blesener made a motion to continue the public hearing to the next monthly meetinq and that the developer come back with a drawing showing a westerly exit for this development. Morson seconded the motion. Stefani added a friendly amendment, noting that if Wachtler is eliminated in the new drawings, some provisions must be made for the future development of Par 3. Blesener accepted the amendment. Voting: all ayes. CASE #82-18, NIDT FSL, This case was continued from the July 27th meeting, when Mn/ FSL VARIANCE requested a variance to allow a portion of a roof at 682 Ocala to remain over the property line of Brent Baskfield's lot at 687 Decorah Lane. Mr. Tom Balyk and Mr. Robert McKinstry, representing Mn/FSL were present, noting that they had given Mr. Baskfield an easement for the porch location. The Commission members asked Mr. Baskfield if he was agreeable to the easement and he responded that he had just received the easement a few minutes earlier and had not had time to look it over. Planner Dahlgren recommended that the Planning Commission do nothing on the variance request until the matter between Mn/FSL and Mr. Baskfield is resolved. Stefani moved, seconded by Butler, to table the matter until an agreement is reached between Mn/FSL and Mr. Baskfield. Voting: 6 ayes, 1 nay, Kruse. CAO 82-03 AND CASE Commission member Morson stated that he is familiar with the house #82-21, STANTON, in question, owned by John McBride, at 1330 Wachtler, and that there MODIFIED SITE PLAN is no problem. Morson recommended approval of the modified site APPROVAL AND plan approval•and a variance to allow placement of a 22' x 22' VARIANCE detachEd garage-closer to the front property line than the existi ' home. Blesener seconded the motion. Voting: all ayes. Mr. Mark Stanton, representing Mr. McBride, noted that he had written approval from the adjacent property owners. .P?anning Commission Minutes, September 28, 1982 Page Five � RECESS Th��Commission members recessed at 11:13 o'clock P reconvened at 11:15 P.M. , MANUFACTURED HOUSING VERBAL REVIEW ADJOURN K. The meeting Planner Dahlgren reviewed and discussed revisions o the Zoning Ordinance relating to manufactured homes and the n ed to amend the Ordinance to include an "R-4" Manufactured Hom Park District. � Chairperson Kruse acknowledged that there should a public hearing on this matter and Butler moved•to have th s item on the October a enda for discussion and setting a public hearing for the November meeting. Blesener seconded the moti n. Voting: all ayes. , Public Works Director Danielson gave a verbal revi w of cases that had gone before the City Council. There being no further business to come before the Commission, Stefani moved, seconded by Kruse, that the meeting be ad'ourned. Voting: all ayes. �, TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:32 o'clock P.M. � CITY QF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: City Council �'ROM: Orvil J. Jphnson City Administrator September 29, 1982 SUBJECT: George Lowe Appaintment tcs Volunteer Fire Depar�ment George Lowe of 20 Somerset Road, has completed the several requi �he pracess af making applicatian for the volunteer fire tiepartment. Noack has reviewed Mr. Lowe's application and has submitted the recc to me for fur�her processing. Mr. Lowe passed. a physical examinatic August 20, I982 and therefare has comp3eted al1 the steps far becomi �' ements in Chief nendation QR x a volunt- eer xreman. , George Lowe has exhibited a considerable amount of interest' in vo unteer fire department ae�ivities. Iie belonged to a volunteer fire departme t priar to moving to Mendata Heights. As you may recall, he was an act�ive me er of the ad hac cammittee studyinc} fire station relocation several years aga. His appoa.nt- ment is different �han the previous anes in that he is 49 years ald. His appointment wauld change the pattern of the past appointmen�s which a 1 have generally been quite young indiva.duals. He passed a special exercise electro- cardiogram which was recommended by the Airport Clinic. I believe th t George Lowe will brinq a eiifferent viewpoint into the arganization and reco enci that he be appainted in accardance with the pravisions af Orc3inance #101. � 0 September 29, 1982 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR � TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: , Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Mend a Heights will meet at 8:00 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, October 5, 1982, in the City all Council Chambers, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider n application from Vernon Colon for a conditional use permit to construct townhouses a property commonly known as 630 Sibley Memorial Highway. More particularly, this land is described as being: all that pa in Auditor's Subdivision No. 4, Lilydale, lying south of the south line. This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed conditional will be heard at this meeting. i i Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk � I of Lot 9 , '401. Such use permit c CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO September 23, 19II2 T0: Planning Commission FROM: Edward F. Kishel City Engineer 9U�JECT: Mendota Townhomes (Colon P.U.D.) Job No. 8220 In early August 1982, the Developer of Mendota Townhomes submitted an escrow deposit for the preparation of a feasiblity report for the in- stallation of public utilities to serve the development. Subsequent to the August 24th meeting of the Planning Commission, the Developer phoned and verbally authorized this office to proceed with ' the report. After looking into the matter, we find that because a final plat has not as yet been approved, it is not possible to complete such a report. Additional information v�ith regard to site grading, building elevations, roadway profile and others is needed to complete a feasibility report. The following comments and thoughts are being submitted to aid the Commission in making a decision regarding the request for approval of the proposed Planned Unit Development. A preliminary study indicates that sanitary sewers, watermains, and storm sewers can be installed to serve the P.U.D. Because a grading plan has not as yet been submitted for approval, it is not possible to prepare a feasibility report for submission to the Council at this time. So as to properly serve the Units, we prefer to have the Developer establish street grades after which public utilities can be designed. We also request that the Developer show how a surface water holding pond with a capacity of approximately 0.83 acre feet and minimum 18 inches of freeboard can be located in the southeast corner of the site. Our determination of pond capacity includes anticipated runoff from approximately 3.13 acres of drainage area east of the proposed site. We have discussed the spilling of surface water from the ponding area into an open ditch along Highway 13 with the hydraulics engineer for P�n/DOT and are assured that with proper controls, permission will be granted. The Developer will have to obtain an access opening for the private roadway entering onto Highway 13. The City will design and construct the extension of Hiawatha Avenue to meet t4iriam Street. � It seems that the name "Mendota Townhomes" is a bit incongruous. 0 i 24 August 1982 PLANNING REPORT CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: 82-13 Vern Colon South of Trunk Highway 13', Westl Miriam Street Approval of Residential PUD 1 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: ! � � 1. The variance to the 10 acre minimum requirement for a PUD having approved by the Planning Commission and Council, the applicant i applying for approval of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) site Please refer to last month's report regarding comments on the pl the basic purposes of the PUD procedure. ' 2. 3. �rly of now lan. , and In this case, where the land area involved is substantially,less han the 10 acres required, it is important to utilize the relativeTy sma 1 amount of open space available in a way so as to satisfy conditions aro nd the periphery of the site. That is to say depending upon how the un'ts are distributed, the available open space will have varied impact on contiguous development and their owners. Thus, the opportunity offered in PUD planning process is that of working with the contiguous property owners so as to be able to adjust the open space so as to accommodate c ntiguous neighborhood concerns. It is obvious that in the new plans some of this has occurred. You will note in comparison to the old plan�that greater number of units are now concentrated nearer Trunk Highway 13 rat er than on the high land to the east. If these changes result in satisf ctory conditions for contiguous property owners, the PUD plan will hav achieved one of its most important purposes. Opinions expressed by,conce ned contiguous owners should reflect the extent to which this condition has bee achieved. In our opinion, this is the most important consideration. ; Another concern we have is that as a result of the concentration of the units near Trunk Highway 13, two of the units are extremely clos to the entrance to the site. As reported in our previous report,'ithe d stance between structures appears to be approximately 60 feet, whereas f this were a single family development, the distance would be 120 feet The 120 feet distance, of course, consists of a 60 foot right-of-way for street purposes and the required 30 foot setback from such right-of-way equaling 120 feet. 4. It would appear possible to modify the site plan so as to achiev a greater distance than currently proposed between these structures. The ul-de-sac proposed to serve as vehicular access to the units will be a"pr vate street". From a financial standpoint, this is, of course, one of the adva taqes of r' CASE NUMBEI2: $2-13 APPLICANT: Vern Colon Page 2 the PUD in the sense tha�. the maintenance of this street is not borne by the City. The cul-cie-sac at the end of such stree� if a.t were a publ.ic road, however, would provide for a 120 foot divided right-of-way which is capable of providing space for the movement/turning arouncl of a fire trucic. The current desa.gn, as we understand i�., proposes a rectilinear pattern of streets �o serve �.his cul-de-sac purpose. We suggest that we ascertain the adequacy af this turn-around for emergency vehicular purpases. The pavement forming the rectilinear cul-de-sac is 16 feet in width and therefore would appear not to be adequate far parking of vehicies. There is some questian in our mind as ta the adequacy of provisions for visitor parking under these conda.tions, There are six houses that front off of this rectilinear cul-de-sac, and some provision for visitor parki.ng should be made. brdinarily, in the case of a public right-of-way, of course, where the street width is approximately 32 feet, such overflow parking can accur on the public stree� itself. The roadway width for the remainder of the cul-de-sac is 24 feet and again, the adequacy for visitar parking is of some cancern. We would suggest that the roadway width be widened so as to pravic2e far excess visitor parking in a manner similar �a that which would be pravided under a publi.c street sys�em. 5. We suggest too �hat the opinions of your engineers be considered regarding the handling of utilities on the site. As you know, there is a storm drainage prablern wii�h respect to the land to the east, and provisions for such drainage are cantemplated in the development of this parcel.. It is also important to determine the conditions under which the extension of Fisrce Street with Miriam Street will be handled. A section of right-af-way connecting these two streets is proposecl, but the cost af canstructi4n of this s�reet shauld be a part of development, which would normally occur if the Zand were to be developed as a typa.cal single family plat. 6. The architecture of the units themselves appear to be interesting and aesthetically desirabie. Ou`r basic concerns relate to the dispasition af the buildings an the site, the handling of the vehicular traffic and parking, and pravisions for drainage solutions and their costs as relates ta the contiguaus proper�ies. m � , 27 July 1982 PLANNING REPORT CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: 82-13 Vernon Colon South of Trunk Highway 13,' Wes Miriam Street � { ACTION REQUESTED: Variance to Minimum Land Area fo PUD PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: , -1y of i l. Vern Colon (Federal Land Company) has resubmitted the proposal fo. Planned Unit Development (PUD) for sixteen townhouse units (forme submitted as fifteen units) on a 5.6 acre tract of land at the we of Miriam Street, south of Trunk Highway 13. , The PUD Section of the Ordinance requires a minimum of ten (10) a land in order to qualify as a viable submission under the PUD reg as described in the Ordinance. The City's Legal Counsel has advi variance should be processed prior to consideration of the PUD it If the variance is granted then the PUD plan and other required e: and data can be considered under the Special Use Procedure for ap: a Planned Unit Development. ' i 2. The first PUD approved in Mendota Heights in the early 60s was th Falls Townhouse Development. This development utilized theinorma family residential density in the form of townhouses concentrated easterly end of the property. The westerly end had an extremely table making it difficult to develop. This space was thus�prese seven acres of it was dedicated to the City for a park. IItilizat the PUD thus provided a substantial benefit to the community and immediate area around the PUD tract. The approximate area of tha 26 acres. Another early development utilizing the PUD Principle of Somerset 19, located at the northwest corner of Dodd Road and Avenue. In this case, a substantial area of wetlands and drainag was preserved by concentrating the units in the form of apartment structures containing condominiums rather than the more typical f townhouses. � � a Y end es of ations d the lf. ibits oval of Ivy single �n the igh water ved, and on of PUD was as that entworth capacity type rm of Obviously, as the land ara3 involved in a particular PUD gets smalle , the potential for achieving the major objective in using the PUD conc pt (preserving natural open space) rapidly diminishes. If a single tructure containing two units allowable on a 30,000 square foot tract were proposed as a PUD, there would obviously be no potential for any substanti 1 preservation of any natural amenities. The question then, become one of what size parcel encompasses enough land to provide for this pot ntial. The extent to which this objPctive is achieved should be applied o the m CASE NUMBER: 82-13 APPLICANT: Vern Colon Page 2 parcel in question on an individual case basis. We should thus be asking ourselves, "Is any substantial portion of the amenity being preserved through'the use of the PUD on the property in question in this case?" 4. As you know, Mr. Colon has applied for a single family plat providing for 12 single family lots on the property. Such a plat was approved distributir�g the housing units very similar to that of the proposed PUD, utilizing a cul-de-sac off Trunk Highway 13, in almost the identical location of the proposed cul-de-sac access in the PUD design under consideration. In short, this means that the proposed development is similar to that of the single family plat in terms of distribution of homes, with the major differnce being that the housing units are constructed in pairs (two units per structure), and that the cul-de-sac is a private street rather than a public street. Looking at it from a standpoint of distribu- tion of units only, the PUD serves as a method of rezoning the land from R-1 to R-2 (duplex units). 5. The purpose of providing a variance provision in any Zoning Ordinance is to allow a means of application for relief from a particular standard in the Ordinance due to a hardship condition caused by some physical property of the land. In this case, the hardship would appear to be that there is no way to expand the acreage from 5.6 acres to the required ten (10) acres, inasmuch as the property is bounded on all sides, either by existing single family development or Trunk Highways. That represents a physical condition appropriate for application for relief, but only if it is perceived that the intent of the Ordinance is achieved through the provision of open space achieved by dispersing the density in some manner to achieve that objective. The PUD as now proposed concentrates a higher number of units closer to Trunk Highway 13, thereby leaving more open space on the southerly high ground, and in an areas westerly of the cul-de-sac. The plans indicate a prbposal to construct a putting green in the latter area. Does this offer substantial amenity to be considered adequate reason for the variance? 6. One of the problems perceived in reviewing the plan is that the concentra- tion of units near Trunk Highway 13 results in structures being within nine (9) feet on the east side of the cul-de-sac pavement area and within 12 feet on the west side. This condition can be corrected, but represents at the moment a mis-use of the flexibi.lity provisions inherent in a PUD process. 7. The distance between the two structures through which the entrance to the cul-de-sac passes is approximately 46 feet. If this were a single family development with a 60 foot dedicated street, the distance between the structures would be 120 feet. C �� C � CASE NUMBER: 82-13 APPLICANT: Vern Colon E� � Page 3 ; We have suggested to Mr. Colon and his associ.ates that they1work closely with the contiguous property owners, and adjust to their concerns. As you know, some of the neighbors in the past have felt that the be efits of the accrued open space that are possible in a PUD process, were not handled in a way to mitigate their concern. This speaks to�the p int of the size of the parcel, inasmuch as if the site did consist�of th requir.ed ten acre area, the location and scale of the open space accrued b concentrating the density in certain areas could be more meaningf l. This is, in fact, why the ten acre minimum was established when t}e PUD regulations were initially established by the I�lanning Commission and Council. The new PUD Plans as submitted indicate a concept of unit design hat appear rather attractive. This is, of course, not the issue with reference to the variance to the ten acre minimum site size. With respect o that question, the factars are very similar to that previously conside ed. The principal question is thPn, does the five acre parcel as curr ntly conceived for development, provide adequate oPEn space amenity (e'ther public or private) that mitigate the impact oi the hi,qher concent ation of density in various parts of. the site? � � HD � �� Y .� f� . �► -, 1 1 �+� . . . � , -� �,�-- , , :� __..1 .r! r _'�'7� !1�- � :r �r i � � � .� j � . � i j i "' '� ; •�;�- � �:�, r;': i �,,1/ �l • � .• . .[� _�.. 1 1 ' �� • <• .4' . • � ^�w` .'� � � � � f � ��'h� ' • � l�C".� "..+ � � " . , :.� .. . /` f . LT� � .;^� . /'.,f ..� -. � , , � � . �� j'� " ;: . � �✓; ' . � � /:� � , � . `r :�`,{� �!'• Y�' , • j�'�`+ •�,�,�i�.�� '� �• +, � • �! � • �� / ,/ . . � {"� � ,•�, � �'+, / � • • • � R� ,,�`4' ((�� v( � .. `�` . �� •'� � � '^.\`',,i. 1 /• , ' ..�'�.' ' �� p � 7 ��. r w •, • ��• yx r` � � � j � { t ._ _. 4•`,t / w `` -.r �� r'�` � . • •. . �:_,.�. _..,w `/'j ,- �r . • L / '/ . i.• - -_: : _ _ �� . r �; f ,' �, ,�"• � ° � . � :/ �;yl.� � • * " AL. � + � 7 '� . . � '�:�;` 7 -r; J /. � J ' , . � 'j} : s, � `. , + �ss� � ��(r�� i I • r' � � • r • .�..�.. � . � • � i •.-_.,_ �•' ,i' ''�; :;� � ',-' ; • , • �a . • ��,l. � �� r � • ,' r y ; K, � � �� %. ~ ' ; • `i + . • • '' ` • ! :� • h� i'� ' / r �' ' � � �i , ii /� � � � / � • • ��( � � ri i� ♦ � �.' ' � j�� » • • � • � • . • • • • • r .'/, , « ,lv. !r 1 �•� . �.� . •.ti � '. • .•'• - , • t r; .<+ f ,r � � ."^ ��` /�� i • , r • � • � � � • � ` , � • , ' �.� Y,t` .�/ i,,; , j � � • • � r ' �� . •• �, . + � . • � h ` f { / � l .�.� � + � � r '�� •C � i � .Y� ' / 1 � � � .�{` � 1 f � '• `i 1� �-._ "L 4 ! • M ' Hi 4—� ,`, • � ,��,�'�'�,J, •'� • ' � • � � • � `/' i +� • �_� �._ � . ,'{"'a 1 t, �J� , �/" � • '1 ( ! � • . ' '" l.�• . —.� • "� • Mo�rk: ' � • ' �i � " "� � � •' , ' ` • � �� . . � . - — - • � ` t � ��' F� . • , • ` MRK . i ' .,�� , r • / .-� � �� ' • , '. i i: . � � � y . • � .' ; . ti . , ,� . . . ;,/ `'J + , . , � • � . � r T �y / • � _� r � = s--� „ � � � � .�■"� � � � �" � t . , � . . i �w� � �. ..� % 4 / ' • {'� :f /r � � ` . e e . .� w ' � • w "'f� � � � � ,[ `� \ • 11 x � � !; . � � 'T � "a� . • _ 4 � �fi • �/.r _, ,' . , • . . .,• . - ', � ��r ' ,' �r i •... • . � � . �� - • ' '� , j . : // . . � . ,�. . , . . J • r � • �• �• f , � � � � '� . � : . � . �. , �.' . • w . , .i'� �r 1� , , , � I t �i r�:, `; . .- .' • �'� � �y r r • • . -�"1 � � • • � • � •• • � •• , •,_� , + fl • �~ k � • � � 4 '' . . • • • • * • • � '• ,� � � .. • � + � � �� • • _ . - . �e I • � _.. • f.� .. . . • t . • • • • , r � � . '+' • i • • •." • t • • • � • • 4 • • . ' • � � �sq�:»�' « . � � . .' . H ,�. •` I . : � "«�; x. _ T �'. . � y♦ . + Mw�� .� • s • • s' . �, �:�... . ,.1. ., . , . . •.1 ritAireiL:v:•�' _. - — /— +r ii . : � , � � � . , - �r � ' - � `�r • � ' - _ � , • , ' � i � � . � . ' ' _.. _ ' i �,..�,..- + . � � � �� ♦ .�,,.d,y,,,_i ('_�Y;.. �,� �,� . •t • �RIL�1fl � � � ' �.�L- :�. — � � � :�� .� � . — ' ' �_ . . . / "� ��.�� r � . ` _� , �'`r• » �9 . .�,�'i� �, �� 4 . , � 'M' • �'' . SOMERSf T f � . .y' • . . • ' � . i • 1. •. � - . / . ... ..__. t - ` • i�la ' . I � .� .._f. � r' ' 4 , � • • � , . . •...+« �� i�. .�.�, .�• �• ' C:i�S� NUMB3.R: i32-13 � .•• t• �� i�PF'LICF�NT: Vernor� C'<�1c3t7 (f'ec3�ra2 Lar�<� Cc�,? •; • , •�•• ` �-- VaYiance tc> M�r7im�nn I��>>�ci . �•�• � t_—,�r 11C`PI�)N: }' .� _ `-�-_ J�r�t3 t"c�t: }�Itl) I�� , j •1� ,' . '---�• !'1 � -- --� _, t , k ! ,., :� 28 September 1982 PLANNiNG REPORT i CASE NUMBER: Ak'PLICANT : 82-13 Federal Land Company , j LOCATXON= South af Trunk Highway 13; West r2y of Miriam S�reet i � AGTION REQUESTED: Appraval of Residential PUD • t . i PLANNING CC?NSZpERATIONS: As you will all recall, the Planna.ng Cozrcnission at its last�regul r meeting vated �o table the develapment appraval of the PUD so as ta'allow ime for the applicant to adjust the drawings in accardance with his�propos. d changes offered at that meeting. The significant change was an offer ta reduce the number oE units by two (from sixteen to fourteen)�. Thi of�er was in response ta the Commission's concern abaut the crowding af he units around the entrance to the project off of Trunk Highway 13. At that meeting, Mr. Colon also nate8 that he wauld be paying for the exte sion of Miriam Street at the sau�hweast carner of the project, and of cour e, � dedicating 60 faot wide right--of-way far this purpose�, j . i A revised site plan submitted shows only the footprint for each o£ the dwelling units and the cul-de-sac with I2 parking spaces at .variou goirtts alang the cul-de-sac. The plan does not show driveways, topagraph , landscaping, and the other elements of the plan xequired as specif cal2y listed in the PUD Ordinance. i l. 2, We have therefore cantacted Mr. Colon and infarmed him of the inad quacy of the plan for the purpose of Development P1an Appraval for�the P D, iie said that he wauld instruct h9.s architects �o prepare the apprapri te plans and have them ready for the Planning Cammission hearing. j 3. Withou�G the topagraphical detail and landscape plans, it is difficr� to evaluate the plan as it has now been revised. It appears�that t reduction of the number af units by two assists materially in redue crowded conditions near Trunk Highway 13. The turn-around at the � cul-de-sac has alsa been,revised to now indicate a I.00 faot diamete circular turn-araund, consistent with �he standards normally�used c street for the handlinq of fire trtzcks« Mr. Gene Lang, Fire Depart Chief, has indicated his appraval a� the plan far fire access purpt Assuming.that we are given a copy af the plan in advance of the mef we wi11 analyze the revisions, and comment to the Planning Commiss� at the hearing itself, t �or us e ng the d of the a public .ent es. ing, CASE NUMBER: 82-13 APPLICANT: Federal Land Company 28 Septembar 1982 Page 2 4. ,We are also cancerned with the disposition of the open space, particularly as it relates to contiguous property owners wha have opposed the prajec� in the past. We have no indication as to whether or not Mr. Colon has met with and satisfied these concerns. One of �he principal advantages of the PUD system is the fact that individual units and other elements of the plan can be adjusted ta meet contiguaus property owners' concerns with the knowledge on the gart of such awners that the plan can be built only in accardance with the approved design. These adjustments are best negotiated by the developer directly with the affected property owners rather than attempting to do this at a Public Hearing. Mr. Colon ha@ indicated his intent to carry out this procedure in the interest af gaining the suppart and confidence oE contiguaus land owners. This suggested procedure does not constitute a deiegation of the decision af approval for the plan ta the property owner which is, of caurse, the ultimate respansibility of the Czty Councii. The flexibili�y of dispersinq the apen space is �he principal feature of the PUD planning process, and can be handled so as to solve same of the problams relating to contiguous praperty owners' concerns. This process should be campleted prior to consideratian of approval of the PUD Development Plan. HD � SEP EI1iED 2 8 1982 � Dear Mayor � Council Members: As resident of Mendota Heights, Ivy Falls specifically, f�have at and thought countless hours about the decision you will shortly be m king on the Federal Land Co. proposal for town houses on the "Clemens" Fa m Property on Hwy. 13. � , I have walked through Cherokee Park and along Hwy. 13 allithe w y to ' the end of Ivy Fa�lls on Sylvandale Road. The view and the homes ate Seauti- � ful, they seem to fit into the contour of the land perfectly. �I jus cannot, in my mind, see this whole concept changed for the good of .nt�.one el�:ept Fed- � eral Land Co. a � I think ten or twelve lovely single styled h�mes set in that ar �3 propertx, arranged to fit the topography of the land, would be a far better an �ver than fourteen or sixteen look-a-like town homes set in a circle. I�feel I�e taxes derived from single family homes would bring as much revenue as the roposed town houses. ! I feel the owners of this land would gain a very handsometprofi from the sale of individual lots, though probably not as much as a group of t wnhouses would bring. But they knew this, land was zoned R-I when they purcha ed this property. j �. In closing, I must say the Mendota Heights council has the fine t reput- ation in the entire metropoiitan area as the fairest, wisest and mos honest councit. Being unreachable and far above any type of intimidation b one owner of a land company that has vowed to overrun this council and tFie peo le of this area for his own personal gain. I feel that in your hearts you will do what you feel should be done for the r.eal good of the people you vowed to rep esent in their best interests. I know you will prove to the rest of the coun ils around the metropolitan areas that no one �person or company can taint�that eputation. Thank you, A very concerned citizen , I R6CElVEG , �SEP 2 8 1982 .� � � ��ti , � ��, Iq��- � �- _ '�'�..o.,��: . �� , _.�.�. �. . �� . �9 a�-�, c�-� .�- �e.rLe_ ,�✓,.�.•� a�-s�-d, � ; �-r-- U 0 :.�wv-m- cM-- 1 ' , � 13 . . , �� t� . . �c�..�.� `1,�1�-�- a,�-� � �- , , . -�8-c...�:.� :�¢1� , � -�,tJ G�.t.U2�. -f�-e i''�-o� - ' a.-c-a,te. . C��- ` ' .i�-t- .��e. `�t1 �z _ � GZrwc� . .v..-WL r .�ti� (�. ,t5ra --iia..t.�.R-e ' . r.r� , .�2 ��.. �c:,G .�-�.� 2cJ o.�.•_ _ �I .-�-a-�-4 �� - I ! - - - �. _ � c� . � � L �;,�.�c. ;�,� �- . � . (� , �. /Yt.t.c�. ��-c.�..�a�L d -- - -- - - � � c� o•-2�a,r��,� J�%�.� _ � .�a�- .z �'�--P�� . �� :�- � �� - , � �..� . . ' , � . �. . �� '.�°,`'` � _ . `�-0�-c..v,h . � � � . G��. `� C�i��/� � � � 0 SPptember 2p�, 1��32 To the Pr.esident and Members of t�he , Plannin� Commission, and the Hono .rable Mayor and Members of the City Council for the ' RrCFiVED SEP281982 Cit�y of A7endota Hei�hts, Minnesot�a � Re: Hearin�;s concernin�; proposed toti�mhouses - Hwy 13 & lorth Ivy Hills area (former Clemens farm) Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:: � � I oppose the buil�lin� of townhouses one bloc�c north ast of mv home in the Iv,y Falls East Addition, The 5.6 acres 5_nvolved is too small for a torrmh�use community of any size, ti�That size there is apparently is �;oin� to e compact- ed into the lotr�er portion of the acrea�e in order to pre erve the �Tieya for. �;he hornes to the east o:C the property, I One c�ncern T ha��e v��ith sL�ch a small developmen�; is that a:Cet�� recalcii:rant members of the townhoilse associat�ion could omprise a majority and tYiereby control the entire decision process as to hov�r t��e �rouilds and buildin�s are maintained. T fear tYiat o er tirne there ma�� no� Ue the pride-in-ownership care taken as th re Z�roL?lc� be with sin�le--famil�� homes, � Sincerely, 1/� � l�l�% J mes R. Konen 989 DoUmin, Street Mendota Hei�;hts, Minnesota C� 9-17-82 � Mayor and city cauncil members: ' �t ¢ "'� �'� t• .) J<✓...}l'z . ; �l _ . ., ! , ' My husband and I are aut o.f town quite a bit and therefore unfortunately unable to attend any of the recent meetings. I also ha.ve never be�n informed of the date or proposed agenda of any of the meetings. ►�e are s.t�ongly against the constxuction of town-houses (ar any multipls dwelling buildings here in this area. It has been zoned single famiiy and that is why we live here. We have owned�.ipleaes and also owtt a candaminium where it is allowablea We are concern�d'. ab�rut praperty values� tra.ffic and generally xhat rentals would result in hexe. I understand {frorn neighbors) that a va.xiance ha.s been granted and tha.t it is just a matter of time before we ca.n�; expect to see a devel.opment. Tt �rould seem that the rulings or law out here are made just to avoid by a s3mpie pracedure..We have ha,d experience with this "overlaoking" or ina.king exceptiot�i to the Iaw before. F€oping you xil]. _consider the view$ of many �a.xpa.yers and homeowners in thi� area rather than the financial success ai oz�e developer and cont�a.ctor, D* R. Heidenreich 59g Sibley H�ty. St. Paul, Minn. e 1 'r r �Q( 3EY !`. t C.�� d 10Q% LQNDORd FiQ�I£} S?". �RUi., i�RN S51 �� , September Ta the Planning Commissian and City Counca.I for the City of Mendata Heights, MN �'�t4i_�Vi_[�) .' � ' ': , 1g 32 Re: Proposed Townhouse Co plex, North Ivy Hil.ls Secon Add�.tion, ( �'ormerly the Clemens Tj`arm) , Mendota Heights,!MN Dear Members: I I would like to indicate my opposition to the prapo ed town- Y�ouse complex considered to be built two blacYs from my lome. J� be].ieve that to�rnhause/condominium units are fbest �ituated together in a multiple --famil�� zoraed area, sucl� as Lex�.n�ton --Ritrer � si�e and �a�;l� Rid�e areas, � One dra��back to the tov�rnhouse!condominium concrpt is that ihPr.e �s a lass of identit;�r U�itI� ov�mership of such units, No one lr�ows erho li.�Tes wi�ere and na ane can identify i�lith a;ny pa ticular resi�er�ce bein�;, for example, the Al�man home, or the SY�a �;hnessy hame, or -�he Elv�rer� home. The cons-�rt2ction becomes� inst'tutional-- not residential. A case in point is the apparent condami it�m com- plex at tre carner of Dodd Road and Z�Tentwo�th. It simply is there-- witl� no identity or at�tachment to the surrondin�; single-f mily c�wellinr;s . ' i S suppart sin�le-family residet�ces in tre small� area once '.nov�rn as the Clemens �arm and presently zoned R-l. i �espectf 11 submitted, ` ' ! i _ j . hn P, Tuahy j 07 Lond�n Road j . v.y Ta7.2s East Addition Mendata Hei�;Y�ts, P�2i� ; J � September 9, 1982 I Mr. Vernon Colin ' Federal Land Company ' 750 S. Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 . John P. Gannaway 590 Windston Cou Mendota Heights, nnesota 55118 RE�EIVEp• S�P �.1 19d� , Dear Vern: � f After conferring with independent real estate developers, not connecte in , anyway to your proposed development, in our neighborhood, I find�it necessary � to rescind any support, or implied support, I may have given the proje t by signing your letter of approval in July 1982. � � The developers state, as they did on the last attempt to build�multipl family dwellings, that the project cannot add to the value of homes in the ne'ghborhood but only detract from them as most multiple family dwellings do. � If you wish to circulate a petition to sell lots and develop the�area " to single � family homes, I will not only sign the petition, but actively support our projecC. � Please remove my name from the list of supporters for your multiple fa ily dwelling project. � ',Sincerely, � , � • John P. Gannaway CC Mendota Heights Planning Commission � Mendota Heights City Council �. �/ �.� /�� /�G� � � .e-Gt-/�' O�(�-L� 1��Cx'�-`'�-l' �'ri` v � � ' � �-r-- � -� � �...�..� � ��`�- �� . . �. �� . �� . �� _ _ � �� ,�-�.�� . ��e� a�� —�e� �-��.. . .-c,�-.��--Q--,,.� �Q , � '�"`' " G�-�. � � �- .s � / l � %� ��, �s�i� ��c�vE� '�� 17 1982 � � . s • � .r e ! a l % I � <. � r j , , ,, ,/ ,, ,. ` � /I t � �j�f - �' ♦ r - ' i� . f , �, / , ,,. , .. � ,� . � �- % . , / �� / ' ,, 1, ,, , , � . f. �! ,� / � ��'; j ��, ,l r � "...._. I" - . � i � `_ r �.` ° • � � / I / r 1 � % I I � ! l/ , . �... % f L./IlL.....'�r � / � s' / � �' �► � ' � > / , / � , � � ,. . I' s' , T. � . r � i � e � .ra . _..�r�r- -' -� � _ ��ri _ _�/-"r� � ' '.:�.,.i��', � / �:_ �.. . i � � _,,, / � � � + / , . �..rL . . ..� �. _�.�. .�' /' i '__ _.�_._.., � / � � � ' �/ _ ` ,,./1 1 _�� _ _ i . `vya, ;; ,_�t , ' t� � � ' RECEfVEp ' � � 0� T -.� 1982 ' � -�� ' � a-�"' �� i a 7 0�.� �!� � �� ' � .�� ,�-� �� ` �� .��' I ..�o cL �� Q�� i � , �� _ : � ; �' - ,Lf ..�,.� , �sv�.o-t.� ��;�� . f , � , � , � , . / � • i / ' �� . � � ��' . i ,c � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: City Council September 29, � 1�82 FROM: Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer � SUBJECT: Eagle Point Condos i I i I have completed my plan review for the 27 dwelling units, unc parking, recreation area and guest room of Phase I and find the plz substantially comply with local codes and ordinances. ', to I have received a building permit application and a letter of request to be placed on the City Council agenda for October 5, 1982 from B uce Martin of Lanvesco. The letter requested just the footing and foundation permit, however, I have had enough time to review complete plans and speci ications for Phase I. � This permit wouldn't include the proposed pool, pool building, fence enclosing the pool area, building sign or the sprinkler permit for the underground parking area. The contractor and sub-contractor�must e licensed prior to their starting on the job as required by ordinance and so e concern has been voiced by staff that if there is a lapse between Phase I nd Phase 2, construction materials, etc. should not be allowed to remain on the site which would create an eyesore for area reside�ts as well as the ne occu- pants of Phase I. � I would recommend approval of the building permit for the E Condos, subject to contractors licenses and an agreement to keep orderly between Phase I and Phase II. � Point site Lanvesco Corporation Suite 490 6600 France Ave. So. Edina, Minnesota 55435 612-927-4004 . September 24, 1982 Paul Berg Code Enforcement Officer City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 RE: Eagle Point Condominium Dear Paul: � � ; I enclose with this letter an Application for Bu'lding Permit and Certificate of Occupancy for the�abov project. The application refers to the plat approved by t e City Council on September 21, 1982, and which will be recorded early next week. � I ask that this application be placed on the Cit Council's agenda for October 5, 1982. We intend to commen e con- struction of the project immediately following t e approval of the footing and foundation permit. I If you need any additional information, please g�ve me a call at your earliest convenience.- � S' erely, c,�-c� � , Bruce E. Martin Vice President Lanvesco Corporation BEM/ln enclosure cc: Mark �Ravich Paul Esch THOMAS P. BALYK & ASSOCIATES ' ATTORNEYS & COUNSELORS AT LAW � � SUITE 109 ; 3570 LEXINGTON AVE. NORTH SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 551 1 2 61 2/483-9205 ' THOMAS P. BALYK �' GARY J. EVERS I September 30, 1982 , Mr. Jim Danielson City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Mendota Heights, Minnesota Re: Abatement of Taxes for Minnesota FSL j , Our File No. 82-114 '� Dear Jim: j Enclosed please find a copy of the proposed resol�ution for the abatement of property taxes for Outlots B& C in D�elawa e Crossing, Dakota County, Minnesota. Our office is req�uesti g to be placed on the agenda for the council meeting scheduled o October 5, 1982. ( � If you have any questions or comments please feellfree to contact our office. Sincerely, ��'' --'''�� <� -C�.�c� ✓ � GARY J. EVERS GJE/cw Enclosure �' , CITY 0 - ;:;t�;��u��;r'� i��r,-H1'� '� Eft •��:i : >>;,.� ; � r -T. -�� iLl ; :�EP 3 � 1982 ; f�, r ;�� .-�-� �� ; `.._� � <r, i � � �1 •. �.:.7 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 82- RESOLUTION APPROVING ABATENI�fiiT OF PROPERTY TAXES FOR OUTLOTS B& C IN DELAWARE CROSSING Wi�REAS, Minnesota FSL Corporation, pursuant to a developers agreement for Delaware Crossing, approved January 9; 1979, by the City of Mendota Heights, has agreed to deed to the City the following legally descri.bed property, located in the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota: Outlots B& C in Delaware Crossing according to the recorded plat thereof. WHEREAS, the above property was inadvertently never deeded to the City of Mendota Heights and that Minnesota FSL Corporation has continued to pay property taxes on the parcels for 1980 and 1981, but has paid no taxes for the year 1982; and WHEREAS, Minnesota FSL Corporation has derived no use or benefit for the years in question and has requested that the City Council approve an abatement of property taxes for the same. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, that approval is hereby granted, by the Mendota Heights City Council for an abatement of property taxes on Outlots B& C in Delaware Crossing, Dakota County, Minnesota, Property ID No.'s 27-19850-020-00 and 27-19850-030-01, for the years 1980, 1981, and 1982, said approval subject to: 1. Filinq with the County Recorder of Dakota County a deed or deeds transfer- ing title from Minnesota FSL Corporation to the City of Mendota Heights for Outlots B& C in Delaware Crossing, Dakota County, Minnesota. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 5th day of October, 1982. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk � � September 30, 1982 T0: • City Manager ' Mayor and City Council FROM: Chief of Police, Dennis Delmont ; SUBJECT: Hunting and Trapping Complaints ! . _ r I have reviewed the concerns of the citizens and council regarding hi within the corporate limits of Mendota Heights and believe that signi areas in question would greatly help in alleviating �the problems. i As you can see by the attached staff report, the problem has not beei However, any discharge of firearms in an uzban__ or residential!area c result in grave consequences. If one side is posted and the other s� not, it allows a convenient defense to any enforcement attempti I I have instructed our officers to be alert to those violationsiand tc appropriate action if they occur. I do feel that signs, though not � quired, would eliminate half of the problem, and give our officers sc support in dealing with the other half. ( DD/rmd nting ng the great. an de is take e- r .• September 29, 1982 T0: Chief Delmont FROM: Sgt, D. Wicks SUBJECT: Hun�ing and Trapping Complaints « In respo�.se to the recent conversatian we had concerning the feasibi of signing Blue Gentian Road prahibi�ing hunting and/or trappirig, I' done some research into the years of 19$I and I9$2 relating to the r for police action. � ty In 19$1 we received three calls relating �o hunters. All three were received in October and all three were in the area af concern, south of Friend y Hi2Zs and B1ue Gentian Raad. On on,1y one ca7.1 were Che subjects located. Th s was on B].ue Gentian Road west of Dodd Road, and the officer involved in t is incident elected ta advise the subj ects. On the oth.er two calls the a ficer respanded to �he area in questian but was unable ta locate any huntin ac�ivity. , 1 During 1981 only one report af trapp3.ng was handled. This was in Febr ary and the area af concern in this incident was �he pond near Wqrrior Drive. The person(s) responsible far setting the trap was unknawn. j i In I9$2 we received five calZs relating to gun shots or shots fired. nly one, which was ain August, was in the area of concern, Blue Gentian Road. T e oificer did make cantact wa.th the parpetratars but as it turned out they were shoating iire works. The other faur calls were not in the area in question, an again a few turned ont ta be fire warks. ; d� j We delt with only ane report needing palice action relating ta trappi g, This occured in. April and was Iocated behind Country Club Market in the fi 1d east of �there. Agaii� we did not have any information as to who the person( ) respansi.bZe for setting the trap was. , For yaur a.nformation and the City Council's, may I shed a Iittle Iigh �he years prior to 1981 concerning our prablems with hunters. Prior C time we had more of a problem because of the undeveloged land south o Friendly Ha.11s to the Eagan border. Up until recentJ.y Eagan allowed h on their side af Blue Gentian Road with permission of the land owner. would create problems because the hunters did not know ar care,iif th in Mendota Heights or Eagan. into th3.s nting Ti2.S y were .• i2') The problems have diminished over the years. I myself along with other officers have arrested hunters and some I have not arrested, but advised. It all depends on the circumstances involved and the professional discretion given to that officer to uphold the law. In my opinion I think signing the areas involved would have a positive effect on future problems with hunters. DWW � CITY C}E' MENDOTA F�EIGF3TS � TO: City Council FROM: Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer , September 29, 19� 32 SUBJ'ECT: Accessary structure at 2078 Theresa Street i Fj I I have written Mr. Thomas Kletcatslcy a letter (see at�.ached}r dvising , him of the necessary steps to obtain a building permit for his buil ing and alsa directed him to stop work an the building until such time as a permit has been issued. � He has contacted me by phone and said that he in�,ends taicompl the city's rules and regul.ations. I will keep Cauncil advised if a fur�her problems arise with this accessory builcli.ng. j , + with Administrativc Offices CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ' Thomas Klecatsky 2078 Theresa Street Mendota Heights, MN Dear Mr. Klecatsky: 55120 September 23, 1982 It has been noted by staff that you are constructing an accessory structure on your property. I have no record of a building permit being issued to you or a contractor if one is involved. You will have to discontinue the construction of this building until such time as you have submitted a site plan and pl�ins for the building, so that a building perr��it can be issued. If you have any Monday thru Friday, in this matter. PRB:ks further questions, you can contact me at 452-1850, 8:00 A.M. - 4:30 P.M. Thankyou for your cooperation Very truly yours, �� Paul R. Berg� Code Enforcement Officer 750 South Plaza Drive • Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 • 452-1850 Case No. CAO �2-- 03 CTTY OF MEIVDOTA HEIGIiTS , Dakota County, Minnesata � APPLICATIC7N F012 C4NSIDERATIC}F� 4 af ' CRITZCAL AREA DEVELQPMENT (Ordinance No.��403j i C Date of Application�,� Fee Paid �l"d `�' Receipt Number �,�. � � Applican�.: '�_ (�� i Name : �'t�xl �t'�}� v'u1 R. }�_ � I Last ! First z�ddress: ��3L-t.N ��'vJ �-� � Number & Street City Pnone : �'� � c�o 2-3 owner: � -T Name : ��- (J,�t1JE V n N � Last First Address: �33Cy �-"l��T�'Z- ��S Number & Street City Street Location of Praperty in Question; Legal Description of Froperty: .�ti U fb t� .�-, 2� S{� t� -� '� Type of Request: Initial ; ,c.,/ �5 � o. i ' 1.�-- �'z.- State i� I Zip Code � ' I � � { �Initzal � 1 SG`� � state i �� Variance Site Plan Apprava Madified Site Pla �� Zig Code Applicant Name: �� Last CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AAKOTA COUNTY, MINN�SOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION � OF PLANNING REQUEST First � Case No. �� QD 3 � � Z j"; d!J Date of Application 9 /y'��'� ---�— Fee Paid t�'�. �A�c�Nu 35�.a.s'�� /-. �� Initial Addre s s: (� t'% 3 L-/1%1 l.{! �t� In �/,%J/"��/G �J%C% ��` �S'� Number & Street City3 —'- State Zip Telephone Number;_ �� 7 �Q�� Owner Name: L Address: f S „� � � ' Number & Street First Street Location of Property in Question: C ity 13 3 � /�r �- �/f �"t�.C.- ,�? Legal Descriptian of Property: Initial State ,�U�J��`�`s 5r��3 DlUI S�c�n/ #�� - �� .� � � � 0 7-- �`� - . Type of Request: Rezoning )S Variance Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.I3.I}. Minor Conditianal Use Permit 5ubdivisian Approval �� P1an Approval Wetlands Permit >c Other L',qb Z ip J � ti��,a �1%�1t/ C��-r�'" s �� o�� a d!% G'�' 15 7-/..� C,- /�C! rl S G� � �-- � L-S a �� J�1 �i ! 7-i C � /i�a�_��- �4 � 28 September 1982 PLAI�NING REPORT CASE NUMBERz AE�PLI CAI3T : LOCATION: ACTION REQCIESTED: PLANNTNG CQNSIDERATIONS: $2-23 attd CAO-82-Q3 Mark Stanton � (3o2�n McBride) West of Wachtler Avenue (see Variance Madified Site Plan I. Mr. Stanton had a garage attached to his house which was built in hillside, which was ultimate].y removed due to probLems of earth m and water having destroyed the foundation walls, Rather than con � the �ement to atternpt to fight that problem, he now proposes to build a separ te garage which would be slight2y in front a� the existing house, and served by the exa.sting driveway and turn-around area. : The new garage location as shawn on the attached site plan will no adversely affect the slope inasmuch as it is being built at a loca�a.on�that s substantially fZat. � . , 2.. The problem here, however, is tha� the Zaning �rdinance does�not a low the construction of an accessory garage in front of the principal stru ture on the si�.e {the house). Nazmally, this is ta prevent garages in the front yard from s�ick5.ng out in front of other hames in the area. �In th s case, however, the homes ta the north and to the south are both closer to Wachtier Avenue than the garage would be. Thus, in this case, the garage w uld not adversely affect the normal setbac}c arrangement, Thus, a variance is requested to this provision af the Ordinance which would allow the canstruct on of the garage in front of the house. I£ you drive by the property; you ill natice that this house and garage are built substantially above Wa htler Avenue, and there are a significant number of trees that actually creen it frozn the street and fram the cantiguaus residents, � 3. The second part of the application is £or approvaZ of construction the Critical Area . The Critical Area boundary line goes through t northwest carner of the property a�, a 45 degree angle fram the sout corner af the property. Thus, tha garage is slightly within�the Cx boundary line. Examination of the site, topographical conditions, caver, and relationship tcs the bluff line wauld suggest that�the g� located in �his location would not adversely affect nor be iri con£] the int�ent of the Critica2 Area Qrdinance. ,That intent is, of coui principally to protect the aesthetic enviranment of �he river corr� This constructian will nat be visible from the river, and will harc visible from the street due to the tree growth on the bluff line wY roughly parallels the Critical Area boundary line as indicated on t map attachecl. HD thin hwest itical Area tree rage ict with �, or. y be ch e sketch CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jim Danielson and Public Works Director September 21, 1982 Paul R. Berg j Code Enforcement Offic SUBJECT: CA082-03 & Case No. 82-21, Stanton Application for CriticallArea Modified Site Plan Review and Variance Mark Stanton was in attendance at a regularly scheduled consulti meeting to discuss a building permi.t to build a 22'x22' detached gar 1330 Wachtler Avenue for.John McBride. Upon review of Mr. Stanton's proposed plan, it was determined that a variance was required to all the detached garage closer to the front property line than the princ structure on the lot and also that the property falls within tYie Cri Overlay district. i 1 The site plans as submitted, appear to conform to the standards CAO district Ordinance. The site plan also demonstrates that althou garage is being placed closer to the front property line than the ho lot, it doesn't extend closer to the front property line than the ad principal structures to the north and south. ; Staff has made a site visit and would agree that the placement o garage as presented is the best location due to the topography of th Staff recommends approval of the variance and the modified�site of the CAO subject to receipt of the signatures of adjacent property . , � �e at � �p.lacing �al cal Area ` the the e on the cent the proposed lot. an approval �wners. SAINT TN�MAS A�A DE Iv1Y 949 MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD • SAINT PAUL • } . ��c:�iV�ci City Council ` City of Mendota Heights , MINNE .� . OCi 1 1982 �, October l, 1982 >�TA • 55120 . T L. {617) 454•4570 On Saturday, September 24, 1�82, our Atfil.etic Director and el.even coac �o erect a garage on our property�. Wh.en theyquit late in the afternc had finished about 70! of th.e job. On Monday we were visited by Paul told to suspend construction until we got a permit. $ecause of the tj �o obt�ain a permit the unfinished garage stands �vul.nera'�1e to the weat are requesting that we be allowed to �inish the roof and sid:tngito prc materials from the c�ret weather, whil.e we go through the process'of obt a permit� -Far ca,�.c��"�.,,5� us+� . � As are mast projec�s at a private schaal, this ane was dane an a shoe� budget. The Athletic Director acted as tTie cantractor, lined up the � (lI coaches}, secured the advice af a contractor working in our�build� �he design of the garage, begged the�cement from a parent (ban Slifiely) the lumber from an alumnus. The slab was done by aur maintenance dep� one of which is a cement contractor an tfie side.� iiowever, Tiecause of inexperience, the AtIzletic Director neglected to obtain a permit. We n,ow �hat mistakes in pracedure were made; but because of"tfie problems and getting our volunteer work force ��oge�her again we ask �o be alloG finish the structure before permanent damage fiappens-to our raof and : caill continue to pursue a permit in the meantime. � We appreciate your consideration of this matter. � I , Sincerely; ; . Patrick Casey � Superintendent � JCP jz-znd . hes began on they Serg and me needed her. We tect our tr�.ng �rk force ng, for , and rtment, reallze of weather ed to tuds. We EX UMBRISIIN VERITA7EM To Members of the City Council: � �EIVED ; �CT 11982 The garage Saint Thomas Academy proposes to build on their property will in no way affect The Convent of the Visitation. We support their request for a conditional use permit. Sincerely, ,:., � ^ Urban L. La ger Headmaster ?4%5 UODU ROAD � �AINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55120 • AREA 612/454-6474 � ❑ �� lea�ue of minnesota cities September 28, 1982 T0: Concerned City Officiais Don Slater, Executive Dire�tor Peggy Flicker, Legislative Counsel � CITIES VICTQRIOUS: GOVERNQR ORDERS FINANCE DEPARINiENT IO CHANGE BUDGET' GUI ELINES In response to vigorous labbying by the League and city officials all'aver the Governar has instructed the �inance Cor�rtissioner to revise the budget g for F.Y. 1984-1987. As Revenue Cammissioner Clyde A11en stated in a letter to Don Slater and dated September 24, "... the decision has already been ma Governar that those guidelines will contain a recommendation that Local Gov be funded at the $270 millian doliar level far all four years covered by the �uidelines." This means that there no longer is a conflict between what th ,epartment to]d you to expect and what the Finance Department is planning t ta pay. It daes not mean that the fundsare "in the bag", however. Note al increase is being planned after 1983. i CITIES MUST KEEP UP THE PRESSURE Sp THAT THE NEW GOVERNOR AND LEGI5LAT A1 though we won an i mportartt vi ctory, r�ost Of �il� WQ2"iC � i@S ahead. The 198: faces many difficult tax and spending decisiori's, and we must keep the�integr city finances a high priarity. ; A call or letter to Governor Quie, gubernatorial �candidates and legislative is stiil in order - expressinq your satisfaction at the decisian that was mt your hape that the state will continue to hanor its commitment to pay�LGA. also express your concern about the process itseif -�he fact that decisions without adequate consultation with cities - and ask for mare corr�nunicat�on � consideration of the locai perspectiVe in the future. � ' � DS:PF:kgj (OVER) he state, idelines addressed e by the rnment Aids budget Revenue be abl e o that no � Y Legislature ity of candidates de and You might were made nd 1 8� universi�y avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55'I O'I (�'I 2] 22r1-5�00 St. Paul Dispatch Friday, Sept. 24, 1982 ��`�� ili��'��t.�S It� ��°� �!� �,1�� By Gary Dawson Staff Writer Minresuta League of Cities of- ficials emerged victorious Thursday in a flap over a state budget plan that would have giv- en cities b120 million tess in state aid over the ne%t four years than they had anticipated. Gov. A1 Quie, siding with city officials, said state law appar- entl�r calls for �30 million more in state aid next year than the level included in a budget plan in July by Finance Commissioner Ailan L. Rudell. . The dispute arose when two state agenci�s dilfered oa the planned local government aid appropTiation fur 1983. State law calls for an appropriation next year of up to E270 million, a b30 million or 11.3 percent increase over current funding. 'The state Revenue Depart- ment, as required by law, noti- f:ed cities that when they set their tax le�ies this fall they should plan on receiving the 32i0 million. But Rudell, in his budget guidetines, called for freezing the appropriation at tha current level, $240 million. Rudell's budget plans v�ere enough to cause panic among the cities, already suffering from aid cutbacks imposed as a result of past state budget deficits. League director pon Slater and legislative counsel Peggy Flicker drafted a memo protest- ing Rudell's action. They urged mayors to protest Rudell's pra posal to political candidates, leg- islators and Quie. Rudell raised the matter in a budget meeting with Quie late Thursday and the governor quickly re.solved the flap, saying the cities should plan on receiv- ing =270 miilion next year. "It was a matte: of interpreta- tion," Rudell said. "The gove; nor wants to go v�ith the E270 mil- lion. We had some unhappy peo- ple out there. I can see their con- cern." The change in buCget plans is not a simple matter, howerer. Rudell had planned on freezing aids at the $240 mitlion level for four years as part of a master budget plan to get the state out of its financial difficulties and restore a healthy operating bal- ance to the ireasury. Now he has been directed to plan at a E270 million level, that, over a four-year period, adds E120 million in costs to the state budget. Rudell preciously sai� that the state could face an 5316 million budget deficit by 1987 assuming reasonable spending increases �, and a July 1, 1983, espiration of the current 7 percent income taa surcharge and 1 percent sales tax increase as called for in state law. He now will have to add E120 million to that potential deficit. Rudell also issued a series of recommendations cailing for re- strained spending and continua- tion of the two "temporary" tax- es, which he said could result in an operating surplus of �657 mil- lion bp 1887. That would now de- crease to a537 m.illion. The sur- plus would be used to finance priority programs. ; ECEi�/EU I SE� 2 �: 19�2 September 23, 1982 City of Mendota Heights 750 Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 Dear Mayor Robert Lockwood & City Council: For the past nine years, in cooperation with the City Council and Staff, we have held a Halloween bonfire for the kids and residenc of Mendota Heights at Mendota Plaza. I would appreciate the consideration of the Mayor & Council to hol this bonfire again this year on October 31, 1981, between the hour of 7:30 P.M. & 9:30 P.M., at Mendota Plaza. � I would also request the Council appropriate $225.00 to allow us t purchase hotdogs and pop for this event. In closing, I want to thank the Mayor and Council for their consid ra- tion in this matter, and also the City Staff, Police Department, Fire Department and Pub:lic Works Department for the help I have receive in the past, which has made this event a worthwhile cause. � I I Very truly yours, l� GU�.-�� Russell A. Wahl � 631 Callahan Place Mendota Heights, MN 55118 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS T0: City Council FROM: SUBJECT Orvil J. Johnson City Administrator Tax Levy Comments MEMO September 30; 1982 } � ( I � Several additional pieces of information should be considered, or at least kept in perspective, while considering the Levy Resolution. As you re all, the 1983 Budget Summary and Levy Resolution were distributed on September lst for your action on October 5th. Please review my Memo dated September 21s for the various facts and figures associated with the proposed 1983 Budqet and Tax Levy. The attached sheet attempts to place the City Levy in pers�ective with the total tax levy as anticipated. Larry prepared this to give you�a pict e of what the taxes will probably be on a typical residence. He based the� antic'pated taxes on a residence with an Estimated Market Value of $86,000 in 1981�, whic went to 94,000 in 1982. Note, then, the Estimated Tax on this residence, and specially� the figures in the Increase column. �(Larry or I will explain how the everal Mill Rates were arrived at). Any reasonable or ordinary changes� in th City's $9.60 increase will have negligible impact on the estimated increase o$234. This ratio and relative importance of local services should be given s rious consideration. � Note the gradual reduction of the City's share of the tax dollar over 1� per year. ( � The bottom half of the sheet shows how the Assessed Valuation is Note that a 9.5� increase in Estimated Market Value results in an 11.1 in Assessed Value. � One other set of data involves the Unappropriated Surplus Balance. remember that the Auditors suggested that the General Fund balance shoi 35� and 50� of the annual budget. We are gradually approaching this a: by the following audit figures: � Dec. 31, 1979 Dec. 31, 1980 Dec. 31, 1981 Dec. 31, 1982 $334,051 ! 313,341 462,175 � � 500,000+ Estimated i I We should establish a levy that will afford service.levels as you det keep a relationship with other units and provide a proper operating b I I stand ready to discuss this further on Tuesday evening. � - reducing increase You may d be between indicated ne, ce. ANTICIPATED 1983 MENDOTA HEIGHTS TAX COMPARISON BASED ON A $94,000 RESIDENCE 1982 Idills County 19.95 City 15.21 School Dist. #197 50.77 School Dist. #917 1.87 Metro 4.05 91.85 Tax $385.06 293.55 979.86 36.09 78.16 1722.72 Esti.mated 1983 Mills Tax 20.00 $430.00 14.10* 303.15 53.25 1144.88 2.00 43.00 4.00 86.00 93.35 2007.03 Increase Dollars $44,94 9.60 165.02 6.91 7.84 234.31 Net Tax (Minus $650 Homestead) $1122.72 $ 1357.03 $234.31 *Based on City Levy of $979,100, final mill rate will be slightly adjusted to reflect "Fiscal Disparity". � 1981 1982 City � of Total: 17.8� 16.5� �, Average Residence Est. Market Value Est. Taxable Homestead Value Computation of Taxable Value (Homestead) Formula 1981 Est. Market Value $86,000 16� x lst $27,000 4,320 22� x 2nd $27,000 5,940 28� x Excess 9,040 Taxable Assessed Value $19,300 1981 City Taxable Value $63,495,000 Less Tax Increment , District 1,150,000 562,435,�00 1983 15.1� 1981 $86,000 19,300 1982 $94,000 21,500 4 1982 Est. Market Value $94,000 4,320 5,940 11,200 $ 21,460 1982 $71,620,000 2,200,000 $69,420,000 .L. S . , 9-29•-82 � 11.4� 3.2 16.8 19.1 10.0 13.2 FZil� � CITY QF MENDOTA HEIGHT� DAKOTA COUNmY,M.INtESOTA I2ESOLUTIQN rIO. $2-82 ' RESOLUTION COI"IM�PIb1NG DAK4TA COUNTY STATE BA1VK j ON ITS TENTH ANNIVERSARY ; WHEREAS, the' City Offices, prior to 1972, had been� loca�ted in the Fire S�ation and Curley's Furniture Library; and � WHEREAS, in 1972, Nid America State Bank constructed building including municipal office space; and � WHEREAS, the City personnel moved into the new affa.ce � on October I7, 1972; and a mew staace WHEREAS, City af�icials, bath elected and appointed, ha e en- joyed an extremely pleasant and caoperative rela�ion�hip wit bank persannel over the ter� year period; and WHEREASr the bank personnel and owners have provided fi ancial resources and services so necessary in the Mendota Heights c mmun- ity during the past ten years. ; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Cauncil this th day of October, 1982, that the Dakota Caunty Sta�.e Bank and its fficials be comrnended far the grow�,h and pasitive inf].uence in Mendot Heights duri.ng the past ten years; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City officials hereby expre s their �hanks and apprecia�.ion ta �he bank af�icials for the xem- plary community support, and especialZy for their generasity in providing space for the Camrnunity Raom/Council Chambers; ancl BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Ci.ty Council ex�.ends it con- gratulations on thas �en year Anniversary date and best wish s�'or many mare successful years. � Adapted by the City Cauncil oi dag of October, 19$2. ATTEST: the City af Mendota Heigh�s t CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA n . n I d . B y� ik'l�liii� /°d � Robert G . ; Lo �, , Mayar � ,, �. ' 'N f K thleen M. Swanson ' . Ci -y Clerk s 5th IGHTS c 0 0 � Announeing New Village Office Locationi The mendota Heights Uillage Offices will be loc� in the new mid—America Bank Building, 750 South Plaz� beginning October 17, 1972. The mid—America Bank pec have built a nice new building in mendota Heights anc leased convenient floor space in the wesi; end of the to,conduct local government activities. � s Village Council meetings and other public meetir will now be conducted in the Bank lobby. We are loo� forward to well—lit, air conditioned, pleasant meetir conditions. The offices, including the Police Depari are arranged to allow convenient access in conductinc Village affairs. The mid—America Bank officials and Uillage offic are conducting a joint -- � . ,Open House on October 24 through October 2? in order that you may view these new, modern faCilit� Your Village personnel will be glad to show you�arour discuss Village affairs. � 0 ted Drive, ple have Bank gs ing 9 ment, Iials es. d and (��ac�t� L J L � � Octc�ber 1`l, l��`72 UILL.AGE DF mENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA CaUNTY STATE QF mINNESOTA minutes af the Regular �leeting Held 7uesday, October 17, 1972 pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the Village Council, Uillage of �lendota Heights, was held at 8:00 o'cloc�k P.m. at the Village Hall, 750 South Plaza pr9,ve, 5aint Paul, minneso�a. (�ayor Huber call.ed the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock P.m. The f'o�.lowing members were present: mayar Huber, Counc3.lmen 8iair, Gutzmer, Lockwood and Wahl. mI�CEL— mayor Huber introduced �ir. Ray tUheeler, Chairman L.ANEOUS of the Board o�' the i�id—America State 8ank, to the Council and audience, and expressed the Cauncil's appreciatian to the Bank officials for allo�uing the Vi].Iage to hold meetings a.n the Bank labby at no cost to th� Uillage. mr. tUheeler introduced �ir. i�ike murray, 8ank President, and �Vr, Eric Iversan, Cashier, to �Ghe Council. APPROVE Counca.lman Wahl. moved apgroval of' the minutes mINUTE� of' the regular meeting held Tuesday, October 3 with carrections. Councilman Gutzmer seconded the motian. �tyes: 5 �fl�/S a d Councilman Lockwood moved approval of the ma.nutes aP the special meeting held Tuesday, Octaber 10 with correctian. Councilman Blair secanded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PLANNING �3ayor Huber requested tl�at the appointment C0�lI�ISSION ta the Planning Commission {for the positipn APPOINTmEfU7 vacated by UJilliam Langford) be postpar�ed until the November 7 meeting. SQmERSET Village Engineer Kishel stated that at the VIEW instructian of�the Council at the �ctober ].4 STREETS special meeting, he has proceeded with a study on Somerset View Streets and stated that the study will be completed next tueek. 8 a � Mr. Orvil Johnson, City Manager City of Mendota Heights 750 Plaza Drive South Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mr. Johnson: s��;" _ :. ,'��.:; �� ; �' 1'��C September 21, 1982 ��t ��:; " ". � ! �) i i o� � � 300 1V. Saint k The Aging Program of the Metropolitan Council, as the federally funded agency on aging" for the Metropolitan Area, completed a study of the s services for older people in Dakota County in 1981. This study was co in conjunction with several organizations within the county and involv large number of community meetings. ro Square Building ul, Minnesota 55101 ione 612/291-6359 area tem of leted a i The plan that resulted from the study contains many recorr�nendations for how services for older people in the county should be organized, provided a d funded; a copy of the plan is enclosed with this mailing. j One section of the plan describes the need for a network of "community sites" or senior centers throughout the county where services are�provi older persons. The plan recommends that such a site be identified in e of the county to be responsible for providing "access" services and pro or arranging for a variety of "community level" services such as social/recreational opportunities, health education, congregate dining, educational opportunities. ---�- ----'--•�� - � SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER RE-OPENS In addition, federal regulations requi designate such sites throughout the Me the delivery of services to older peo� � Therefore, a preliminary survey of pot County was completed by our Aging Prog indicated that there are some sites pr while others are developing such servi� The Advisory Committee on Aging wouldi which meet their criteria but which ar� appropriate to arrange for/provide com In addition, the Corr�nittee is concerne' agencies accept such designation and il their site and serve older people. � i Therefore, we are asking you as one of, serves older people to respond to the 1 sites: � i _ :;__ .. � _. The West St. Paul Senior Citize begin another ,year of ope;ration ;High School.on,Monday,,October Center'is open from October thr serves about 1,000 area senior-� ing that time. Coordinating Cen ties is Mrs. Grace Galvin; a lon resi dent of the West St. �Paul: ar cal week at the Center includes offered by COMPAS, crocheting, a program, bridge, and other card addition to these activiti!es, pe blood,pressure screening is offe attorney is available by a�ppoint income tax assistance is a�lso av The Center is a cooperative vent Di stri ct 197 Corr�nuni ty Edu�cati on West St. Paul Park and Recreatio � OGf �/9��2 An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development oP the Twin Cities Metrop�olitan P Anolca County O Carver County O Dakota County q Hennepin County O R,amsey County O Scott County O W i ve 1 d to h area ding � �n d ,T� GRASS : Center will at Grass Jr. � . The ugh May and itizens dur- ter activi- i g-time ' ea. A typi- art classes � n exercise games. In ' riodic ' red, an � ` � ment, and � ailable. ; ure of ; and the � �� Dept. � Comprising: ngton Count,y 9 - 2 - - If you are one of the agencies whose site is listed, we would appreciate a formal response from your board indicating your willingness to accept the designation as a community level site and your commitment to continuing to sponsor the site and serve older people. - If your agency provides services to older people but does not sponsor a potential site, we would like to know whether or not the sites to be designated to serve your area are appropriate. Feel free to either write a letter or contact our staff with your comments. We would appreciate receiving your response within the next month - by October 20, 1982, if possible. Our staff is available to answer any questions you may have on this subject, and would be happy to come to a meeting of your board or advisory corr�mittee to discuss it in more detail. .. Enclosed for your information is a list of the potentially designated sites in Dakota County as well as more information on the responsibilities of designated sites. Issue of Volunteer Opportunities for Older People Although the Dakota County Plan (enclosed) describes a large role for older volunteers, no specific recommendations are made for the organizat'ion, provision, and funding of such programs. The plan does mention that volunteers should be involved in providing "access" services at community level sites and neighborhood sites such as churches and senior clubs. Because increasing attention is now being focussed on the need for volunteers, we feel ttiat recorr�nendations on volunteer ,opportunities should be added to the plan. � . , To help our staff further study the issues involved in the effective provision of volunteer_opportunities for older people in Dakota County, please complete the enclosed questionnaire and�return by October 20. Thank you ahead of time for your assistance. ��As work on these topics continue, you will be kept informed. Please contact LaRhae Knatterud (291-6497) of our staff for more information on either the site designation or the issue of volunteer opportunities. - , � � �� Sincerely, , , . , ' j�'-�;,�� , � , Naomi Pikul, Chair � Advisory Committee on Aging cc: Dakota County Plan List of Potential Community Level Sites Responsibilities of Designated Sites Questionnaire on Volunteer Opportunities POTENTIAL COMMUNITY LEVEL SITES IN DAKOTA COUNTY* �: �:;. �� x , , .,��: - � �� i��ti .f�,��r � . � y i � � `,� �i''' i I � Based upon the survey of potential sites serving older people in the ight community areas of Dakota County identified in the Dakota County Plan, the following sites (and sponsoring agencies) either currently provide th full range of "community level services" or appear to have the greatest po ential for providing "community level services" in their area. ! 1. South St. Paul Comnunity Area South St. Paul Senior Citizens Center � Sponsoring Agency: Community Education Department, South S't. Pau School District 100 Seventh Avenue North South St. Paul, MN 55075 Area Served: South St. Paul and surrounding area Services Provided at Site 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Social and Recreation Services (School District, Parks and Recreation, Civic Arts Commission) Adult Education (South St. Paul Adult Education St. Paul Parks and Recreation) Adult Day Care (School District) � South , � Progra , Volunteer Opportunit�es (School District) ; Stroke Club (School District) � Outreach (School District) ; Congregate Dining (Ramsey Action Program) ; Transportation (Neighbors, D.A.R.T.S.) ! Legal Assistance (Southern Minnesota Regional Legal Se Inc.) � Tax Assistance (V.I.T.A.) Mental Health Counseling (Dakota County Mental Health Caregivers Support Group (Wilder Foundation) i Health Screening •� * A comp ete copy of the survey of sites serving older people County is available from the Program on Aging. in Dak . Paul ;, South ices, ter) ota -2- 2. West St. Paul Co�nunity Area Seniar Citizens Center - Grass Junior Nigh School Spansoring Agencies: Community Education Department, West St. Fau1 School D�strict and City af �est St. Paul 182 Butier Avenue North West St. Paul, MN 55118 Area Served. �est St. Paul Area Services Provided at Site l. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Adult Educatian {School District} Sacial and Recreation Services {School District, Recreation Qepartment� Information and Referral (City) Tax Assistance (V.I.T.A.) ' Health Screening (Dakota County Nursing Service} Legal Assistance (SMRLS) City Park and Naan Meai (Schooi District through Grass Junior High) 3. Burnsville, Apple Va17ey, Eaqan Com�unity Area Sioux Trai1 Seniar Center Sponsoring Agency; Cammunity Services Department, Burnsville School District 2801 River Nills Drive , 8urnsville, MN 55337 Area Served. Burnsvil]e; portions of Eagan, Apple Va11ey, Savage and Rosernount Services Provided at Site l. Comprehensive Outreach (Schoai District} 2. Social and Recreation Services (School District� 3. Transportation (D.A.R.T.S., Schaol District) 4. Information and Referrai {Community Action Caunci�i, School District) 5. Volunteer Opportunities (D.A.R.T.S., Retired Senior Vo]unteer Program, Volunieer Services of Dakota County) 6. Health Screening (Dakata County Nursin g Service} 7. Education (Dakota Technical Institute, 5ocial Security Administration� 8. Congregate Dining (School District through Sioux Traii Elementary Schooi} 9. Peer Counseling {Cammunity Action Council, School District) 10, Tax Assistance (V.I.T.A.) -3- 4. Rosemount Corr�nunity Area Rosemount Senior Citizens Center Sponsoring Agency: City of Rosemount Kenrose Shopping Center Rosemount, MN 55068 Area Served: Rosemount Area Services Provided at Site 1. Education (School District) 2. Social Activities (School District) 3. Transportation (D.A.R.T.S.) � � � 5. Inver Grove Heights Community Area ; Inver Grove Heights City Hall � Sponsoring Agency: Corrxnunity Services Department, Inver Grove-Pir Bend School District* ' 6701 Doane Trail Inver Grove Heights, MN 55075 � Area Served: Inver Grove Heights Area � Services Provided at Site � � 1. Social Activities (School District, Parks and Recreati 2. Health Screening (Public Health Nursing) � 6. Lakeville Community Area St. John's Lutheran Church Sponsoring Agency: City of Lakeville 8748 - 210st Street Lakeville, MN 55044 Area Served: Lakeville Area Services Provided at Site 1. Social Activities/Senior Club (City of Lakeville) 2. Transportation (provided by participants) 3. Potluck Meals (City of Lakeville) * This agency receives partial funding from the City of Inver �Grove to provide services. ; I �e ) ights - � - 7. Farmington Community Area Farmingtan Area Senior Center Sponsoring Agency: City of Farmington 431 Third Sireet Farmington, MN 550Z4 Area Served: Farmingtan Area Services Provided at Site Title III Older Americans Act funds were awarded io this center by the Metrapalitan Cauncil in Juiy, I982 ta develop and administer a multipurpose senior center. Title III-funded multipurpose senior centers are required to provide or arrange for a rtumber of services including comprehensive outreach, social and recreation services, cangregate dining, and transportatian. 8. Hastings Community Area Hastings Seniar Center Sponsaring Agency: Corr�nunity Educatian Department, Has�ings School District Hastings Senior High School llth and Pine Hastings, MN 55033 Area Served: Hastings Area Services Provided at Siie 1. Social and Recreation Services �Schaol Distr9ct) 2. Education Programs (School District} 3. Legal Assistance (5choal District) 4. Tax Assistance {V.I.T.A.) 5. Peer Counseling (School District) 6. Health Screening {Public Nealth Nursing Service} 7. Transportation (Hastings TRAC, D.A.R.T.S.) 8. Information and Referral {Schaa] District} 9. Volunteer Opportunities (School District) LN795A 1. RESPONSIBILITIES OF DESIG�ATED COMMUNITY LEVEL SITES What is a"community level site?" The concept of a"community level site" is based upon the need id by older people and service providers for local centers that can information about services needed by older people in their commun also develop or arrange for services to be provided within that 1 community. The term "community level site" is used by the Metrop Council's Advisory Committee on Aging to describe the community a centers throughout the Metro Area identified as appropriate to pr these services. The Committee is required by federal regulations designate such sites for service delivery to the elderly througho Metro Area. � 2. What are the s� cific responsibilities of "cortununity level sites"? Community level sites to the older providing or including: people in �arran gi n g are responsible for providing outreach serv their community. They are also responsibl� for a broad range of "corranunity level" ser� , - health education and screening � - congregate dining - supportive/peer counseling ! - social/recreation al/educational opportunities - assistance with tax and other forms - activities which encourage integration of disabled elderly in ongoing programs at the site ' - transportation (to and from the site). f It is recognized that some sites have all these services availabl while others are in the process of developing these services�. It important to note that cort�nunity leve] sites do not have to provi these services directly. On the contrary, emphasis is placed on for {rather than providing) services whenever possible and approp Each site is to be an advocate for adequate provision of service area and is responsible for seeing that services needed by its ar residents are available. . I In addition, the designation of a corr�nunity level site does �not me all "community level services" must or should be available a�t that site. However, "colocation" of services at the community level si encouraged when possible since it does provide a single focal poin delivery of services to the elderly in a given community. ' �tified �ovide :y an d :al i tan I sen i or �i de ;o ; the for ces all ranging ate . its 's older n that specific e is for the 3. -2- What daes it mean to a spansaring aqency if its site is designated? Once a site is designa�ed, it is seen by the Advisory Cammittee on Aging as part of a network of community leve} s�tes in each county throughout the M�tro Area. Along with those Bg��C1@S that pravide centralized "access" services, it is considered an important part of the access system for older people. Designated community level sites are listed in the fi�etropolitan Cauncil`s Area Plan for Programs on Aging submitted t� the Minnesata Board on Aging each year. The Aging Program also schedules periodic information al ar training meetings with these sites. It is nat the intent of the Advfsory Committee on Aging to pravide Tiile III funds to each designated community levei site, since many designated sites in the Metro Area have strong pragrams funded through a variety of other funding sources. However, the Advisory Car�nittee on Aging's funding policies state that, in those counties where a service delivery plan has been completed and sites have been designated, funds far outreach services and multipurpose senior center facilities and administration wili aniy be available ta designated community level sites.* Therefare, since there are no legal or financiai contracts between the designated sites and the Agin g Program (except in cases where a site is receiving Title III funds), this designation can be accepted ar rejected by any individual site. Nawev.er, it is hoped that potential sites in Dakota.County will see value in this designation and will want to participate in a county-wide network. 4. What would be the relationship between desi nated sites and other agencies or programs �n t e county. This description of community level sites is not meant ta impiy that aii services far older people must be delivered at these sites, or to minimize the role of county-wide agencies that provide services to meet specific needs. Rather, the community 1eve1 sites provide a��more coherent and understanda6le network for the delivery of certain�services for older peapie at the iocai level. � Since many of the "comunity ieve7" services (listed earlier} are in fact prav�ded by county-wide agencies, good working relatianships between ]ocal sites and these agencies are essen�ial and can lead to the provision by caunty-wide agencies af tl�eir services at community level sites. It is hoped that joint planning and development of needed services by local sites and county-wide agencies will result from these linkages. * Qther agencies may be funded to provide outreach services if they can document a large unme� need and a close worEcing relaiionship with iocai community level sites. -3- 5. Wh are there no communit level sites desi nated in the rural o tions of Dakota County? �, Based upon the service delivery study completed in Dakota County, it was felt that "neighborhood level" sites such as churches and enior clubs were a more acceptable and appropriate way of providing acc ss services to older people in the rural sections of the county. Th refore, because no stated need for this type of site was identified�in th se areas, no community level sites have been suggested. � , LH798A � .�� .' • ' � �. • QUESTIONNAIRE�ON'Vj'�OLUNTEER OPPORTUNITIES. ` • ' ,_ • c`: ' ".r; .t ` _ , • .. v' �LU� , . , � . f ��,.,,.- �,�.� ... �� ,... , . ., , , f :b�:::a;,,r,•IN�DAKOTA�:COUNTY.-{.`_•` . ,;.',��".;�; �� . . .. . .,. `:; y, :,<.�',;� � � . , , . , , . ' �. , . ;�,.,.� ��;�,z -. . i,. , r , . _ • ,r :. � :• ,; �� : x . '�`� �. .: ;" • � �>: '.�'4;. ;` . a � �r , , . • ,� . „ , ' I .,tj,4 ' '•"� , ' � � �" . . �i . .;e, . . ' ' 1 ' , ry .+. ,. , n . .. .- ., . c.i: _,<•r,. . , . � 1. ' .., r�� • .+ �. i, •, , , . ! � i � 1' x • V w .� � , ' , .. , ,'�';'` :ti .Sl�v�., . i�s i��'� ty� i:. , - �,'`"r."• �� (� e , - i . . � ,� ' . . ;'��;.:;�s.;, ��t;�7To,y.he.lp,� usw•analy.ze;how:.vol�unteer�;-opportuni-ties;�=for-;'ol'der�.people��in�-�Da ota �''r � ,�,� y � .. , ��.•;'�.'��;.- ;; :County:.,should be, organized;••,prouided ,and;,funded;splease��answeri.the_follow-in ".�};� - ",� . .'` � ' ` uestions==.,and ;retur.n�<b ` �. • , .. � ,. . ". . ` . 9*° � :;� �.�- °;,4� °��-t:,q ,.�, . y-October.*20,�n1982;�5to: �:��:�:.,.,....:-:a-.. �;�y�"�....��.x;�,�,��;;..x-.�.: -Ax.�`;�.��'�.��'�� : , . ' ,s .�: �� "i�c'.... {'; ;.��, �:. ,�:.;j^.., . : f. .� , yt. ' ,!• ~ ` ` ' '�, _ � ' j ,�T',• , , , � _ '�:'r, �r.` �3r � "t;. ,f_:,..:, ,. �� . ,� . ... _ � - ��?`>' , •; -�d- .».e., v.�. ,�:"+'M.;r.t,'�,�s�i'.:.yc•,� »o.'.-..�i.;V .,,,.��..;r.......+, ..ys".•.i•:.,y'. . • . , ,. . . �, y�;:,: .�x�.:; � Agi n gx; Rro gr am ��. _ .. , �� . . �. ��X., �...�r�- , . ,� . �- , . y '` . .:. . .. ..:,. . � . .� .�• r•:�c �. . :�:. ° �� .�} - �� Metropo l i tan Coun ci l°'�` .- ` . ��- - '':;�� ` . . � ,: °�_ . k : ..�.. � . .- . , . , , :: �.� - .�". �. �:� �i' ,_ ,._ ..... .�;`,`�.� Seventh � and�Robert� Streets� . .. .. . . ..- : . � r;`�;,:r�� . - . • �. _ - < . ;;�` . ' _� . • , ' St.� Paul;- MN;. `55,101 � .. , ., -.:s.; ;: . , �e:f'; �,i� . ` � . . . • . - • ' :3 . ' �': , 'a�-•r'•a , _ • �ti.�' �f. ' �a ' ��.'.jL : ; � ' . '' ; . „�.' . • �' i, j4.�� • a . ;;;�;�� ; .`A�.��.Organization� and'��P.rovision� � . ' - � � :;., �� ' , � . � " � :;�'. .`* . - ` • �. ., ,� : � , . . •3•. t.. �,',' � ti.;at's ::�:�'.'^• c y* ; - . ;��;';,`��:��-'� �� -' 1�'`�=� Wh�ich:of�th'e-following.ways:.of�_�organiz`ing vo]unteer,�opp�ortun,ities for . � ,;�'F'�';�"�7r��Y , .. older. peiople`'�do�ryou��..feel��is�;most��effeetive?'"� .'ti". ;;;: .��:._� . --�-. ' . "4`••!i-".. ' . 1 •ai�r. �� .; . { .:: ,. . - • r , . . � •' i. �"', ".' , ; ,. . . . 1.:' �•��.;a,�y • ^ �.r •..S'3 , : .::+ . .�,;,. .. .�. ,.. y �'.. . ..:.": ....#.. � . �i "; `�'..�'� � ,, , „ , . _. ��"'`a:�:�; a separate;��service`should�:recruit��older.vol�unteer's,and place ��- ',- � .� , , .. them in�.�appropriate °agencies. : - , � � � ' � .: t ' . . , , i : � ' , :i r , o ... . , � � . .� ' � ' . ' 'b:'• a.separate�se`rvice�should�:�recruit,�all:person's.�interested in ' . • . � • . volunteering (including older •people) and. place��.th�em in - - � ,,. - ,, appr`"opriate� agencies . � . . . . � - � ' � '�, re . � . .;_ti ♦ ' . • � . • . i . .4 �� ' . ��' .. .! :f. t , � 'i� "l.';Y � = f• ,� ��.^ . . •• • r.r'w %, ,,�"V�f�_.r.. � `'� , ,-�{:� ••��Y�s=;'.��Y, a,c::�� . eachr,agency�� shou�l,d ;recruit �and• place��its�.own�".vol�unteers ' � � • � �. :��_ . ; :�`; .,,,. �.ri . . . . . � �� . . , , . , . � . .. _ � ;,', '.f =�:, :�'��:::-�• � • ' -,,.r` - 'j�� - . ., • .d. -`. : . ;.:. ; .' . ,. . <<; • . c � �� al l ��of��the�� above�•�are .needed. � � - � `'��`` ��` � , _ ; . ',.:;.,.. , ... , , ... .. � . l:;�t - `;�' , �` �:�:.: • ' - , � ' •, �; • _ .,�_ ,. � .. ' � - � � - I- ... _ � ` - : - ' - . ';? �:� . �.i�-..,«;�,: '.e.. , , 47'r . .. .�.�(�,.5.,�. ��. . .. ,. . .' _. - . -� �•r"Q � -. . ,... .. � rr;. , � '`,. ..,.. , :r.,. .1 . : . y� � . :� .�,.:.��' .. . . ..,� � ��e. . othert� (speci_fy)r: . � . , .. � . - _ _ , • _ • - ,;u- : , � � , � • , .� . �.,,;�;�.,s ; :. . • . , : . . . ` . r . - � • -;: ,.,t , _, , � " . �;.,.. - V � � = . - • � . (_uy'~" �•�i ��, • �>. � . ' . . • . - r ' .." , . . S• � . "L .. �F � ` , . . . _t..�«��i,d. .�;, �1::i��':��.,."-"' ,. _ • • .. y�S"� ��.� n1f .. .eF��3•: ::�J!�1• . . -.ys,�s•�Y..ry.�� . ..L •. . .*.it�- - v r� -�.Y.- ..A.� t. � -' " ' �' �:t' 1'' �a. • k w ., �:lr:�,�:fx.�`�Y��;��'�; ::2.��;r�r:Do ou feel��..the`�wa, �.t�hat' . . --�.a . , ':E, � .. ,..,:�:Ls . ,�� _ 3� YJ .volunteer�-�opportuni,ties��•arev�'now,.� , . . , ::�: ��_:=:�-:;:;,:: ,..�x��1K..or.gan,�:�zed.��andw�p'rovided ��is-�general ly• �`K� 3�fi. ♦ r�T•` . ` � . ' :s :'. �,:kn. i. ;r�y+� y�'�. e i<� .4'., i�(� � ' : E•.. ' � ' !� ' 'iF, • '�' � - '?�� . . r< -?��-w�=��- �i:: .^-r�..�.. 6 y '�;+„, � . . r>, �» , .'t F.,'1- • . , � . :, � • . 'Y S`F, . .,+ , . . �• r.. . i'•� r i .. � �'� � . �� a: � very�''satisfactory ° ' � ' � . . . .. < .-... :��.w� ;�, : . . �,� . - . , ;_ ;'� , ,�.: `:;:;" ; • ', . • � ` - '�� ' ., . _ `. t: . . F�,. ' � �' ' : : • : ;;,:. :'�: � . . . . ,:��.�,,� ,.,. ...,F��,,,b`. :satisfactory==�^•. ". . '.;` `" � - '�,`��;. < -.. �r,,_+ `i,. ,.: .. , � � 4 ; ;c•. t + . Y�' , :.�� ,�l •'- ..- �y_ �,, _ F� • .. nq, � , ; .t _. . ; F ' , ` :n`y t'.:a�" { ry .. � . . �', .,3;�r; . � . ^.G,,�.,i: • ��;f,.� .. .. ;`:3.t. . . -r . . �. . ,� � . � • Y y ` .i' x�' .' ' �r . ` . �. , w �Y,+=` • - . ',{..��"'� - , '• � ' ' _ 4�.�i i'.' _ ' • '��''"��rf' ' ... •�-a�.._�,f� ' • .1, , tv'�� ' _, '. � � .. � � ;.rc:�� un�satisfac�tory , . : . .. .'d.: . . . . �?.. . :z:'��-°�� .. ��,.,�<; . . . , . �. �:�. . , : . . . . 2.., .� �.. ' .F�`' . • , ' � 'i. �,i :- -0 . ' .,. . , 7`�;, �.. • � .. � . . . . .. , ' M1 4 �. , . . . , . . • . T�~ � . . � , �_ , � -� � . ,�:;',d . ��• .,very .un sati sfactory. �� _ .. '. ' .�' - . , . � : . -. , . ,., _ � � � � ` � �:._;,:: =:. ' � :�„'.� , ; : . , : , , � - . . . ' , , � k _ �, �� :.�- '�� '., _._.S.`;n�If;;:you; answered_:"c"-or.�"d;"�.please describe�:the reasonsr�why�t e � ' - , .�. � . � • current situation,�is•unsatisfactory: .. • ', ; , , „ � ,�.. . *. '-. • ', .. , . , _ .. : � • .' � ,� , • . . � ; ,. , , . � 0 -2- 3. In the space below, please describe the types of linkages that you feel are most needed among agencies that recruit, train and/or use older volunteers in Dakota County. B. Fundin 1. How do you feel volunteer programs should be funded? a. by each agency according to its own funding sources. b. primarily by private sources, such as United Way, foundations, etc. c. primarily by local public sources, such as county, municipal, school district, etc. d, primarily by other public sources such as state and federal governmen t. � e. combination of above (specify): f . other (specify) : C. Additional Comments Please use the space below to make any additional comments about volunteer opportunities for older people in Dakota County, particularly how you feel they could be made more effective. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE! LH797A 4' 1 i<'�."t.i_:`di�.1.3 ��'e1�� 9'i 50 CENTRAL AVENIJE N.E.. E3LAING. MSNNES07.� � • � l ' �� Ye�� City Managers and r�dministrataza; Enclosed is an announcement o� an Association of Metrop Mur�icipalitieslMetroAolitan Counci� £ollaw-up Conferenc I�ousing, Octobe.� 27, 1982. I t�ust you recall our S�pt '�i Can�erence, "Where Wiil Qur �hildren Live?" T�:e �� po�itan �rea participation was fantastic and rewarding. war_t to �epeat it. , �J12� L.t:2itL, "Pubi.icJ�riva�e '�c.x�ilBi��2ip & F'10U�'!�Cj'� �:@?L'L'1� a core �.s�u�, resgective local. governznent/deveioper r��e A��er�.can housing delivery syst�m. Housing in3ustry�:�ite an� practiticr.ers ar� tal:cing al.��, about the necessa.ty o "public!��ivate partnership" to the future o�' hcusinq. is ��, does it �xis�t, �s it more than r•�a:sey, whe:ce does How do you put �he partners�ip together? Can iocal'gove decisior. makers be comfartab�.e in a�artnership? The AMif Nousi�g Commit�en beiie=res � cor.uno^ canscio�:snes � rived through metrapolitan exchange, most c�ntribut�s ta continued balanced production of housing tt:roughou� the palitan area. The Canference will emphasize A��iM/Metro C housing concern, and discuss some partnership projects w occurring. There will be a�nock �'ouncil meeting high?ig partnersi�ip issues and subsequently discussion. , � Last y�ar I voluntecred your considerable comnunicati�ns �o bring c�:t your community of�icials, Caun�zlme-�bers, P GomTnissicaners, etc. You're credited with the succe�� of �onfe�enc� and S'm asking you to build on success. ��lea u�= I�ur respective communications device�, chan:�els, a, ents---repetitively to the dat4 of the conference--to bri: veur cem,-nunity official.s and developers. Remember the d � o;: cover�,r_g conxerence costs for Council and Plannincr Co� sian rnembers. 1w Your r�w�.rd, if �r�u at�er�d, will be Jerr1 Splinter *ahat hz'� u� �c n�w: S��erely, � ,h _ � ` /L. 1 L sli M. � '. son Ci y M ger L,.'�+SJ : g #'� EP 3 u 1��2 t61 2} 7S�•6?OC} itan an cer YJP. 3.i"1 `t.' lia :!1@ ature a ut canat t �x�st? n�r«nt r ae� the etro- uncil's ich ar� �ing �owers a:�n_ng tr.� e aga�n tal- g out vire mi. s- 7 �� I ! � Program � PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP: IT'S MORE THAN JUST MONEY A Housi�tg Canference far Local {}fficiais ' . ; . October 27, 19$2 • Sheraton Midway � Interstate Hwy. 94 at Hamline Av. St. Paui, Minnesota 4 p.m. Registration 4:30 Welcame: Charles Weaver, chairman, Metropolitan Council 4:40 Keynote Address: George Latimer, mayor, St. Paul 5:10 Panel: Partnerships in Actian: Examples of Taols and Techniques Moderator: Leslie Johzlson, city manager, Biaine, and AMM Housing Committee The City as an Equity Partner. David Sellergren, attorney, Bloomingtan HRA; vice president, Larkin, Hoffman, Daly and Lindgren Rfltlover Housiilg: How New Hames for Elderly People Can Halp Young Famitif Gerald Splinter, city manager, Brooklyn Center Using Land Write-down €or Scattered Sites. Bruce Nordquist, housing specialis#, Negotiating Affardable Housing Prices. Lee Starr, director of planning, Coan Ra � 6:10 Social tber �eld ' �l:�Q DiI1228F Skit: The scene is a city council meeting. City of�cials and developers show publ"c-private partnership in action. ' 'i:50 Panel: Clearing the Air Abaut Partnership: How City Of�cials, Staff and Dev� Wark Togetirer Moderator: Mary Anderson, council member, Golden Valley; AMM president Lyn Burtan, assistant vice-president, Northland Martgage Co. Donaid Jacobson, directar of devaiapment, Bor-son Companies Jeff Sweet, city manager, Golden Valley � 8:30 Questions and Discussion ' � 8:45 Wrap-up: Mary Anderson, AMM president ! Can _..__.__.._� _._..__.__ � � �� r �� r� �w �� r� � �� rr � w�� w � r� �� wr� � �r� � �� • Name Address City Regisiration A Housi�xg Conference for Local Officials O C17eck enclosed (make payable to Metropalitan Coun ❑ Bili my city � � , � City � 'I'o register, mail this form or call the Council at 291-6464 by Oct. 21. (Metropolitan Coi�ncil, 300 Metro Square Bidg., 7th alid Robert Sts., St. Paul, Mrnn. S5I01. Conference fee, includil g din��er, � is $13.50 a person. Cay�cellations after noon, (7ct. 25; will be billed ta your city or to you dir ctly. PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP: IT'S MORE THAN JUST MONEY A Housing Conference for Local Of�cials October 27, 1982 Cosponsored by Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and Metropolitan Council CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO October 5, 9:00 A.M. TO: FROM: File . Orvil J. Johnson City Administrator SUBJECT: TH 110/TH 149 MEETING PARTICIPANTS: Mn/DOT: Dick Elasky, Mike Lewis,!Bob ,� sas Elmer Morris, MSA � City: Larry Shaughnessy, Jim Danielso , Ed Kishel, Orvil Johnson � Mn/DOT personnel presented a proposed layout of new�TH 1 9 on the presently unused corridor. They used an overlay to pro�ect a first stage construction from South Plaza Drive to about CheriiLane as well as the original drawing showing four lane divided roadways fr m TH 110 to I 494 as well as the associated frontage roads. � Bob Rosas indicated that the estimated construction'cost the first phase which includes construction from Hauensteins the intersection to south of Wagon Wheel Trail, would be�appr $2,000,000. He also indicated that $1.5 million worth of no may be required through the Friendly Hills area. Bob proceed explain how MPCA and Mn/DOT interact, such interaction may or be the same as the City Council and the local residents.' At it was noted that we have approximately $1,000,000 of MSA mon could be used for TH 149 construction. Larry Shaughnessy and Morris agreed that approximately $600,000 of receipts would b able after the 1984 allocations and that approximately�$400 of bonding could be accomplished thereby providing approximat $1,000,000 for "off-system" improvements. Elmer Morrisidid serious concern as to the eligibility of "temporary" construc between South Plaza Drive and Wagon Wheel Trail. j Another surprise was the explanation of the TH 110 profi was noted that a grade separation interchange fits very riicel the proposed location. Bob Rosas indicated the serious grade when TH 149 intersects with TH 110. He called attention to t problem of no "landing" east of TH 149 for westbound traffic. acknowledged by all of us that a new at-grade intersection in proposed area would actually pose a worse intersection than p exists at TH 149. This matter was discussed to some length, that the alignment of TH 149 could not be moved very much wes improve the bad situation. for hrough ximately se walls d to may not his stage es that Elmer avail- 000 ly xpress ion e. It at problems It was the esently oting erly to Some time was also spent explaining the feasibility or de�sire- Page Two ability of improving the existing TH 149 roadway. It was noted that additional right-of-way could be acquired on the westerly side re- latively easily, however, other major intersection improvements would need to be made such as signalling and channelization. If this was done, what could be done with the existing unused TH 149 right-of-way? State officials still seemed reluctant to abandon the right-of-way -- maybe nothing should be done with it for a few years. In summary, the ball is back in Mendota Heights' court. What do we want to do with the major intersection? Mn/DOT officials noted that the present 10,000 ADT traffic on TH 149 will remain about the same in the future. (They indicated that the north/south traffic may vary from 8,500 to 13,000 after I-494 is opened up). In other words, the traffic volumes are such that a three lane, four lane, or four lane divided could be constructed for TH 149. It was agreed that the Council now will have to consider the cost feasibility, the intersection feasib- ility and development desireabilities, then advise Mn/DOT of our intentions. NOTE Mn/DOT left the various drawings for future City use. I suggest that we have a work meeting with Howard Dahlgren and City Council members to thoroughly discuss this proposed land development scheme and once and for all make a decision as to proceed or shelve it! r � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO T0: City Council FROM: Edward F. Kishel City Engineer ;� � HAND OUT r' �� rs.0 _ .. .. _. October 4, 1982 SUBJECT: Maple Park Court - Storm Sewers & Streets Job No. 7911 Improvement 79-12 In the course of preparing for the public hearing regarding st and streets in Maple Park Court to be held on October 19th, a few s minor incidents occurred which should be brought to the attention o Council. � On or about September 15th, we were visited by a resident of P�� Park Court, one Richard C. Herzog, owner of Lot 4, Block 6, Ivy Fal� Mr. Herzog had received the hearing notice and wanted all available mation regarding the hearing. When informed that this was the purpc the hearing, he insisted on knowing beforehand. I We sat down and explained the details which seemed to satisfy i even indicated a favorable interest in the project if the proposed c could be installed along the entire front lot line of his property. plained that this possibly could be done but it would have to'be di� at the hearing. i We discussed assessment methods as well as potential prel�iminar ment figures. We even discussed potential uniform assessments over parcels. Mr. Herzog finally left seemingly satisfied. ' �_ � The next day he phoned me with some suggestions relative to thE of eliminating some of the proposed pipe lines and curb work.' We ac plained existing and past policy relative to street and storm sewer tion and again he seemed satisfied with our explanation. I �� rm sewers �emingly � the ple s Addition. infor- se of im. He urb work We ex- cussed assess- 11 five possibility in ex- onstruc- A few days later Mr. Herzog came in and talked to Jim while I w s out of the office. Upon my return I entered the discussion during� which time, Mr. Herzog was permitted to look through our files and reports,relat've to the project. He was even given a copy of Mr. Abrahamson's letter of request for relief. Again he seemed satisfied. � ; On Tuesday, September 21st, I received a phone call from a mutu 1 friend � who had received a memorandum that day regarding the project. ;We ar attaching a copy of that memo for your use and information. There is no',indic tion as to who prepared the memo but inference is that Mr. Herzog is involve . On one or two occasions, Mr. Herzog mentioned that he hasl,discu sed storm sewer and street construction in ivy Falls Addition with Mr. Leon Go drich, � President of the Home Owner's Association, and from these discussions obtained the history of the previous meetings and hearings. Confidential information regarding the September 23rd meeting at Mr. Herzog's house indicates that about 15 or 18 persons attended, that exagger- ated assessment costs were mentioned and that concern was felt for expanded improvements if Maple Park Court was upgraded. P�Ir. Abrahamson was not at the meeting but there was some mention of his legal rights concerning public surface water being spilled onto his property. From information obtained at the September 23rd meeting, it appears that two of the affected property owners are for the project, two are against it, and one was neutral at the time but is expected to be against the project at the time of the hearing. Because of the nature of the hearing, that is, "assessment" as well as "feasibility", Staff is attempting to cover all phases hy.retaining the ser- vices of a professional appraiser to determine potential benefits from the proposed improvements. It is felt that because of the size of the project and the limited number of properties involved, this is an ideal situation in which to determine the relative merits of such professional assistance. This is the first time such procedure has been followed but it may well be a tool to be used in the preparation of future assessment hearings. As of this writing, the appraiser has not received cooperation from the property owners, especially those appearing to be against the project, by not permitting him to enter their homes for inspection. This apparently is part of his method of evaluation. On Thursday, September 30th, Mr. Herzog phoned Orvil requesting infor- mation regarding the need for appraisals and the need to inspect the dwelling interiors. Staff's reasoning was explained and his respone was that permis- sion would not be granted. Late this afternoon, the City Administrator received conies of appraisal results from Bob Hutchinson, the Appraiser. S�e City Administrator separate memorandum. a�.---- � . . '� ' A.l„l.t;��,PI()N • IVY FALLS FZRST AI)i)I1'Iuid �iU�•1�; t}�rlt�tl;ItS Your city is attenrpting to qu3etly insta].1 new streets and se�•,ers i,t Ivy ralls rirsC ,�ciclitian clespite your avjectious Cwo years a�o, 'Lhe five lot owncrs on ;Iap].e i'ark Court ►�avc Ueen notiJ:iecl oF a p��blic licaring Ucto2�er I9, 1�152 at iiiflQ p.m. to cans�.�ier tiie proposed constructj_an of new �treeCs ancl S�C•r�rg in ;laple Park Court. Assessments per lot are as much as $I2,�40.00 �Ius. �cccirding to tiie city en�,ineer, "....�..the five 1.ots t.�ould then no lon�er bs:. involved in £uture street and storm sewer assessrients fc�r the balance of Clie- su�division." Ti�is �s obvi,pusly a UIVIll� A.dl) COi�'QUIiR strat:�gy designed to �ccor,.— p.l.3.sh sar�eotle's dream to liave on3.y "first class" streets i.n �iendbCa l�eights. , If ynu �,�isl1 to receive additional in£ormatiort, di.,cuss the proposal� a� ca��sider al.ter�iatives, p2ease co�tie Co a iiei�i�t.aorizaoci meetin� on T�1ursclay� Septenl>er 23, 1�82, 7;30 p.m. at �1►e 3lerzog's -- 703 :•ia�].c Park Court ar ca21 Ui.ck lierzog at 457-83�}j�.� __ --- CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: City Council � October 5, 1982 � FROM: Orvil J. Johnson City Administrator _ SUBJECT: Maple Park Court Assessment Hearing Additional Assessment Practices As has been discussed many times in the past, assessment: be based on "benefit". We have bri.efly discussed the value oi an appraisal prepared in order to support assessment figures. have now engaged such services and have additional informatic your consideration. ( I took the liberty of engaging Robert S. Hutchinson of W Paul to perform appraisals on the five properties involved in Park Court hearing. He was advised by Ed as to the proposed p improvements. Then he was asked to perform a before and�afte appraisal on the properties in order to arrive at a"benefit" he determined it. The result of his appraisals is as follows BEFORE AFTER Menning Lot 8 $95,900 $98,865 1 Herzog Lot 4 124,300 128,�150 � Walker Lot 5 183,800 189,800 , 1 Smith Lot 6 248,100 255,800 i 1 Abrahamson Lot 7 97,500 106,I500 Total "Benef it�" : You will note that his total benefit amounts to some $29,515 to Ed's estimated assessment of $46,500. From these fig'ures, that the proposed construction exceeds the estimated benefits $17,000. As we have been advised over a period of years�, if ment exceeds the "benefits" then the City is sub�ect to beinq which involves'not only a loss of assessments, but added lega ; It appears that the Cit� Council has a number of options. following four options are somewhat inter-related however th � �u�- are to having We n for st St. , the Maple blic as BENEFIT $2,965 3,850 6,000 7,700 9,000 1$29,515 s compared it appears by some he assess- contested, ex�enses. The are Page Two listed in a probable descending order as to acceptabililty. Your actions could take ane of the follawing: l. Abandan the project because cost exceeds the benefi�s. 2. Proceed with the project, order construction as proposed, and take a chance on bei�g challenged (before awarding a construction contract) then act in ane af the fallowing ways: a. Abandon the project; b. Reduce the costs ta match appraised "benefit�" and proceed with the project; c. Reduce the amount of assessments to the appraised benefits, and absorb �he $17,000 as Generai �blig- ation. (This is based on original level of design and constructian}. 3. Reduce the design and cost o£ the project to match the esti- mated benefits and try to get acceptance by all five awners. 4. Proceed as in #2, order in the praject, and acknawledge that the City will absarb additional costs (approximately $17,Op0) in order to maintain consistent street and starm sewer con- struc�ion standards. It does appear that the bene�its accruing ta this small neighbor- hood of five residences is less than the proposed cost. If we place some amou�t af credence in the appraisals, then it is obvious that some modifying set of .circumstances has to be applied. This mod- ification or total abandonment is a policy ma�ter that must be address- ed -- preferably before the upcoming assessment hearing on October 19th. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS .'� MEMO { i September 30, 1 T0: City Council FROt�: James E. Danielson Public Works Director ' � SUBJECT: Richard Paul Residence - 940 Wagon Wheel Trail� ; � At the September 21, 1982 Council meeting a question was rais d about some apparent construction in the front yard of this home. (The o iginal building permit for the structure was issued in 1978). I � A site visit was conducted by the building inspector and mysel on September 23. The only ongoing work that seems to be evident is la dscaping. It was noted however that the existing driveway did not have�a culv rt under it for drainage. Wagon Wheel Trail is a County road and the omeowner should have applied for a dri�veway permit from them. Assumi"ng the esident complied with that �requirement�the County should have provided a cu vert if one was needed. � The fact was reported to the County and they are going to inve tigate the matter. CI7Y OF MENOOTA HEIGNTS M�r�o T0; City Council FROM: James E. Danielson Public Warks Directar SUSJECT: Mrt/DQT Maintenance Garage Starm Sewer Connection october 5, 1982 ; � Mn/DOT has two storm sewer leads that were ta be connected to t e City starm sewer sysie�n in tne future. {�ne iead from their roaf wa er and one from their east parking lot) i MnJ00T proposes ta construct the portian of the City starm sewe main needed to make their cannection. This work would be done in advance of the upcor�ing City project. They proposed io use iheir own forces 'and in siack materials. Mn/DOT has worked out the design of this pipe with Ed an I and now discover they don't have the pipe size and type required in stoc . t They have asked the City to buy the pipe needed and include the costs in their fuiure assessr�enis. Staff feels the City shauld cooperate ith them provided Council concurrs. I have talked with Sherm and he fee s we could proceed. ' Mn/DOT has received quotes from several 18:�nchClass 3, R.C.F. with Type R-4 joints: Su�pliers North Star Concrete Elk River Concret� Hancock (Cannon Falls Plant� Bladholm Brothers I suppliers for the�472 f et of � Bid Amount $6,1I2.40 $6,112.4Q $6,1]2,40 $6,112.40 Staff recommends purchase af 472 feet of R.C.P. from Elk River for installation by Mn/OQT forces. Costs to be assigned to Mn/DOT storm wa�er assessments. ( 0 i oncrete ture 1982 GENERAL ELECTION JUDGES PRECINCT #l, Somerset School, 1355 Dodd Road D.• Ruth Grunke, Captain 1155 Dodd Road D. June Wagner 1392 �armdale Road R. Sa1.ly Countryman 648 Ivy Fa11s Avenue D. Mary Daherty 664 Maple Park Drive R, Eileen Mullen 1288 Dodd Road 2. Lucille Cur�.is 589 Valley Lane PRECINCT #2, Bank Building, 750 South Plaza Drive D. Laurita Weinzettel, Captain R, Betty Andersan R. Virginia Simek D. Betty Moen R. Nancy Kruse D. Rita Ma�zko ' Hubert Meier (Peace p�ficeri 2I.44 Dodd Road 2119 Patricia 814 �€azel Cour�. 2319 5wan Drive 902 Cheri Lane 907 Cheri Lane 795 Keokuk Lane PRECINGT #3, Mendota Schaol, 2001 South Vic�oria Road R. Marilyn VanZyl, Captain D. Joan Smith D. Beveraly Lerman I. Maraella Sundberg R. Annabel Randolph R. Marge Kaepke Wilfred Dehrer (P. Officer) 1400 Wachtler Road 1$18 E'aro Lane 1645 3ames Road 1838 Faro Lane 541 W. Emerson Ave. 1423 Farmdale Road 182� So. Va,ctoria PRECINCT #4, Henry Sibley High Schaol, 1897 Delaware Avenue D. R. R. D. D. R. R. Marjorie Cheesebraw, Cap'�. Dorothy Troeltzsch Pat Burow Edwina Burrows Theresa Redding Anne Russert ,7oan Frank 594 W. Marie Avenue 825 Hilltop Road 654 - lst Avenue 668 - ].st Avenue 720 W. Wentworth 1420 Farmdale Road 774 Lawer Calonial Drive PRECINCT #5, ABSENTEE BALIAT, City Hall, 750 Sou�h Plaza Drive 457- 529 451- 199 457- ?70 457- 355 457- 554 457- 524 1 4 54- � 452- 454- ' 454- E 454- �� 454- '� 454- 59 48 47 85 65 457-6 87 452-3 48 �454-4 IO 454-4 79 {457-3 63 �457-1 50 454-4 99 454-1 40 454-5 79 457-3 35 457-6 58 454-1 12 455-3 88 457-1 64 R. Evelyn Fischer 1733 Lansfard Lane 454-1 50 D. Josephine Pruse 2354 Pagel Raad '452-1 34 D. Marilyn Nelson 894 Wagon Wheel TraiZ '454-1 24 R. Arvid Ru�d 787 Keokuk Lane 454-4 98 General Election Judges; November 2, 1982 RECEIVING CENTER, 750 South Plaza Drive D. D. R. I. I. I. I. R. Marilyn Nelson Josephine Pruse Arvid Rued Mary Shaughnessy Margaret Walter Laurie Weinzettel Rosemary Murphy Shirley Worlanan Page Two 894 Wagon Wheel Trail 2354 Pagel Road 787 Keokuk Lane 27 Dorset Road 1480 Somerset Ct. 2140 Dodd Road 1696 James Road 1456 Farmdale Road COUNTING CENTER, Inver Grove Heights City Hall 454-16:4 452-1034 454-4698 454-1100 457-1480 454-4659 454-1880 457-4151 R. Nancy Kruse 902 Cheri Lane 454-3854 D. Rita Maczko 907 Cheri Lane 454-1628 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGI-ITS MEMO TO: City Council 'r'ROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Manufactured Housing October 1,'1982 i As I trust you will recall, we advised you several months ago t legislature had adopted new statutory provisions relating to mobile The impact of the legislation on Mendota Heights and other cit� be significant. The terms "manufactured homes" and "manufactured hc have supplanted the original "mobile home" and "mobile home park" te statutory definition of a"manufactured home" in MS 327.14 amended i nition of a"mobile home and does not relate to structures most of L otherwise perceive to be manufactured home, such as the structure cc in sections in the Eide Addition. The recent legislation also dicta "manufactured housing" may only be regulated by the State Building C that such structures may not be restricted from an entire City. As was acknowledged in April, the City must now provide the fra to allow manufactured housing in the City. At that time, the �Counci ected staff to research the matter and prepare draft Ordinance amend to make provisions for a manufactured housing district. i, We have attached for your information, a memo and draft Zonit�g nance amendments prepared by Howard Dahlgren. The proposed ordinanc uage was prepared after staff ineetings with Howard and John Schardlo a good deal of research by both planners. Given the length of time the legislative action and the August lst effective date of the Stat preparation was set aside to allow the completion of more pressing m and was not deligently pursued until September 17th. Copies of the were distributed to the Planning Commission at its last regular meet The amendments are to be discussed at the October Commission meeting a public hearing will be conducted at their November meeting. ': ; Both this memo and the attachments are submitted to you as a st report. I believe that Howard has done a very good job of addressin the statutory requirements and the City's sensitivities and welcome comments you might have so that adjustments in the draft can be pres to the Commission in October. ' � Since the ordinance draft was Council initiated it seems that you be aware of its contents within the same time frame ssion. hat the homes. es could me parks" rms. The s a defi- s would nstructed tes that ode and work dir- nts rdi- lang- , after etween te, the tters ttached ng. and tus both ny nted approp iate as the ommi- t HOWARD DAHLGREN � CONSU LTIN G P �SSOCIATES INCORPORATED AN N ERS O N E G R O V E L A N D T E R R A C E MINNEAPOLIS� MINNE OTA 55403 612•377-3536 MEMORANDUM DATE: 28 September 1982 TO: Mendota Heights City Council and Planning Commission FROM: Howard Dahlgren Revisions to Zoning Ordinance Relating to Manufactured l The 198� session of the Minnesota State Legislature enacted'new 1 gislation eliminating the term "mobile home" and substituting a description for "manufactured homes". This legislation further prescribes that m nufac- tured homes shall be permitted in single family zones, and must b allowed within the community. ', A publication by the League of Minnesota Cities entitled "Manufac Homes - Notes and Ordinances", dated July 1982, suggests actions cities may take with respect to the new law. Information from th consultation with municipal attorneys, and research on the law it suggest that two principal actions should be taken. One is the p of the Manufactured Home Zoning District added to the Zoning Ordi purposes of making it possible to develop a manufactured home par the community. The other is amendments to the single family zone standards for single family housing which may preclude the placem manufactured homes too small, or of such design and layout so as them incompatible with existing single family homes within the co 1 I Attached is a suggested preliminary draft of the new�Zoning'Distr "Manufactured Homes Park" to be added as Section 10A. We have al a preliminary draft of amendments to, Section 4 of the Zoning Ord (Ordinance 401) under the General Provisions section of the�Ordin prescribing certain minimums for single family homes in both sing districts.(R-1 and R-lA). � Also attached for your suggested deletion in the Definitions sect Ordinance (Section 3) are the definitions for Mobile Homes and Mo Parks, and substituting a new definition for Manufactured Homes a Manufactured Home Parks. � hat t tract, :paration .nce for within to set t of � make �uni ty . ct, o added nance family n of the le Home We suggest that the Planning Commission and Council may consider he citing of a pulic hearing for•the next regular meeting of the Pla ning Commission to consider the Ordinance amendments as proposed'and/o as may be modified based on input from the Planning Commission, Staff, a d others. MEMORANDUM RE: Revisions to Zoning Ordinance re: Manufactured Homes Page 2 Researching other communities, we have found that Brooklyn Park has approved what we believe to be the first plat for manufactured homes in the Metropolitan Area. This plat and PUD is on an eight acre site with a density of 4.5 units per acre, and a lot width of 57 feet. The housing units are 900 to 1,300 square feet in area, and have 30 foot public streets in a 60 foot right-of-way. Copies of this proposal and illustrations of of the proposed manufactured homes will be available at the Planning Commission meeting for information purposes. FID/j k AMENDMEI�I'.r ADDITION TO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGI-tTS 4RDINANCE N0. 40I (ZONING ORDIIVANCE) +ii 4.18 Minimum s far Sinqle Residentiai Distri.c�ts. 4.18(1) All Single family dwellings shall have a minimum a� one {1,040? sq,uare feet of useable floar space above grade. 4.18(2) All single family dwellings shall be a minimum of �wenty- o{22) � feet in width and the length shall not exceed three (3} ti es the width. ,4.18(3) A1]. single �amily homes shall have a baseman� or eellar. 4.18(4) A private two-car garage with a minimum floor area of four hunclred farty (444} squarg feet shall be required to be built conc rrent with the principal s�ructure. ' 4.18(5) All dziveways and required off-street parking spaces shall be surfaced with concre�e or bituminous surface. �! t i 4.18{6) All waste material, debris, refuse, garbage, fuel includin wood- pzles af one card ar I.arger (four feet by faur feet by eig t feet) , or materials nat currently in use for construction shall b stared indoars, or tatalZy screened from the eye-level vie from public streets and adjacent properties. 1 4.18(7? With the exceptian of earth sheltered homes, alZ homes shal have a pitched roof of at least 3 in 12. � � 4.18(8) All single family dwellinqs shall be sided with material na than ten (10) inches in width and be af a nan-refl.ective ma ' 4.18(9) A11 single family dwellinqs shall meet the requirements of Unifarm Building Code and/or M.S. 32'7. ' 1]ELETE: 3.2('78) Mabile Eiome: Any type of structure or vehicle which can be adapted to or does provide facilities for a persan or�persor rat ar sleep which is mounted on wheels, has provisions far � or may be loaded on an ordinary flat bed truck, such as a hc trailex, canverted bus or truck, tent or small buil.ding. i 3.2(�9) Mobile Home Park: Any site, lot, field, or track of land u� which two i2) or more occupied mobile homes are harbored, ei 0 c}reater rial. eadily to heels, se AMENDMENT ADDITION Page 2 free af charge or for revenue purposes, and shall include any building, structuxe, tent, vehicle, or enclosure used or intended for use as part af the equipment or such mobile home park. ADD TO DEFZNITIONS: 3.2(78) Manufactured Home: A structure, transportable in ane or more seations, which in the traveling made is eight body feet or mare in width•or 40 body feet or mare in length, or when erected on site, is 320 or more square feet, and which is built on a permanent chassis and designed to be used as a dwelling with or without a permanent foundation when cannected to the required utilities, and includes the plumkying, heating, air conditianing, and electrical system contained therein; except that the term includes any structure which meets all the requir�nents and with respect to which the manufacturer files a cer�ification reguired by �he secretary (af the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development} and complies with the standards established under this chapter. 3.2(79) Manufactured Home Park: A tract of land at least ten acres in area where two or more manufac�ured hames are located, zoned, and built in accordance with Section l0A o� this Ordinance. HDJjk ., , � AMENDMENT ADDITION TO ' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ORDINANCE N0. 401 � (ZONING ORDINANCE) I ADD: . � SECTION 10A. "R-4" r4anufactured Home Park� District lOA.l Permitted Uses ; � Within the "R-4" Manufactured Home Park District, no , shall be used except for the following purpose: i lOA.l(1) Manufactured Home � I 10A.1(2) Public Parks and Playgrounds � 4 10A.1(3) These uses as permitted and regulated in Section 4 of Ordinance ' 10A.2 10A.2(1) 10A.2 (2) 10A.3 10A.4 10A.4 (1) ture Conditional Uses j Within any "R-4" District, no structure or land shall be sed for the following use except by Conditional Use Permit: Manufactured Home I Uses lised in Sections 7.2(3), 7.2(7), 7.2(8), and 7.2(10). Accessory Uses � Within any "R-4" District, no structure or land shall be u as an accessory use except those accessory uses listed in Section 7.3. ; i Performance Standards � } The following minimum standards shall be observed subject additional requirements, exceptions, and modifications as forth in this Chapter and Section 17 of this Ordinanoe. Lot Requirements: � Minimum Lot Area 7,500 square feet � Lot Width Interior 60 feet � Lot Width Corner 75 feet � 0 o the et Side Yard Setback Parking Side Front Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback 10 feet 10 feet 30 feet 30 feet Ordinance No. 401 Page 2 �OA.4(2) The minimum street width within "R-4" Districts shall be thirty (30) feet. Streets shall be surfaced with poured-in-place � concrete or bituminous material. All curbing shall be poured- in-place concrete. 10A.4(3) A buffer yard of not less than thirty (30) feet in width shall be landscaped with appropriate grass, shrubbery, and trees around the entire perimeter of the'manufactured home park. This buffer yard shall be maintained by the owner of the manufactured home park. 10A.4(4) The Minnesota Department of Administration Building Code Division of Rules for Mobile Homes Support and Tie-Down Systems, authorized • by Minnesota Statutes 327.31 and 327.34, are hereby adopted by reference and made a part of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein. All new manufactured homes or those manufactured homes changing ownership shall be equiped with an anchoring and support system as defined and approved by said state rules. It shall be unlawful for anyone to own or occupy a manufactured home in violation of this Ordinance. Manufactured home parks shall not allow any manufactured homes to remain in a manufactured home park in violation of this Ordinance. 10A.5 Standards for Manufactured Home Parks 10A.5(1) All waste material, debris, refuse, garbage, fuel, or materials not currently in use for construction shall be stored indoors, or totally screened from the eye-level view from public streets , and adjacent properties. 10A.5(2) 10A.5 (3) 10A.5 (4) 10A.5(4)a A manufactured home park shall have a landscape plan subject to City approval which should be bonded to one and one-half (1�) times its anticipated costs to insure completion. All manufactured home parks shall have a storm shelter or evacu- ation plan approved by the City. Parking: Each manufactured home site shall have off-street parking space surfaced with concrete or bituminous for two (2) automobiles. 10A.5(4)b 10A.5(4)c 10A.5(5)• 10A.5(5)a 10A.5(5)b 10A.5(5)c 10A.5 (6) 10A.5(7) HD/jk e No. 401 Page 3 Each manufact�red home park shall maintain a hard surfac off-street parking lot for guests of occupants in the a unt of one (1) space for each five (5) manufactured home sites. Access drives off roads to all parking spaces and manufa tured home sites shall be surfaced with concrete or bituminous according to specification established by the City! Utilities: . � � t All manufactured homes shall be served by a public water nd sanitary sewer system. All utilities shall be underground. There shall be no ov rhead wires or supporting poles except those essential for stre t or other lighting purposes. ; Access shall be provided to allow the inspection of plumb'ng, electrical facilities, and related manufactured home equi ment. The park shall have a street lighting plan approved by th City. i I All manufactured homes courts shall have at least ten (10 percent of the land area developed for recreational use '(tennis c urts, children's play equipment, swi.mming pool, golf green, etc ) developed and maintained at the owner/operator's expense. i �