The URL can be used to link to this page

1982-10-19CIT'X flF MENDOTA HEIGiiTS Dakota Caunty, Minnesota AGENDA October 19, 1.982, 7:30 P.M. l. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Approval of Minutes, October 5, 1982. 4. Cansent Calendar: a. Appraval of the List of Ciaims. b. Approval of the List o£ Licenses. (Attached). c. Memo and proposed resolution to authorize execution af sug; Agreement to Mn/DQT watermain relocation agreement. d. Acknowledgement o� the Fire Department monthly report �'or e. Acknawlec3gement of the Treasurer`s monthly report �or Sept� f. Acknowledgement o£ the NDC4 minutes af October 6th and acte: End of Consent Calendar. S. Old Business a. Case No. 82-13, CoZon -- Application for Conditional Use P Planned Unit Development. {Hearing closed on Qctaber 5th} 6. HEARTNGS: B , ; �.:,x.,�..� . � for Oct. 20th. y � r n � t for a. Feasibility/Assessment Hearing an praposed Map1e Park Court Tmprovements. 8:00 P.M. {See attaehed Na�ice of Hearing, proposed assess ent rall and memo from City Engineer). b. Hearing an praposed Housing Plan. 8:45 P.M. (See attached(Notice oi I3earing and f1,ow chart) . ( 7. Department Reparts a. Memo from Fire Marshall on Ftemote Fire Pager Transmitter. 8. Communications a. Letter from Eagan on proposed guidelines for land use campai with aircraft noise. 9. New Business: • Public Mayar Council Members City Attorney a. iteview and recommendation on Fire Station Architect agre lity Agenda, Oc�.ober 19, 19$2 Page Two City Etigineer Public Warks Director a. Letter from MnjDOT on Noise Wall approval. City Treasurer a. Memo on issuance of Equipment Certificates far 1982j83. City Clerk a. Reschedule November 2nd regular meeti.ng. (Recommend 10. Adjoux'n. 4th} . R � ; a L'ac�e No. 1.'/20 October 5, 19$2 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ' DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of �.he Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, �ctober 5, 1982 Pursuant to due call and notice thereaf, the regular meetin of the Ci�ty Council, City af Mendota Heights, was heid at 7:30 O'c ock P.M, r at the City Hall, 750 South Plaza Dri.ve, Mendota Heights, M'nnesota. t Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:30 a'clack .M. The followi.ng members were present: Mayor Lockwood, Couz�cilman Hartmann, Losleben, Mertensotto and Councilwoman Witt. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ayes: 5 Nays. 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 4 Nays: Q Abstain: CONSENT CALENDAR Cauncilman Hartmann moved approval of the m nutes of the August 3 meeting. Councilman Lasleben seconded the motion. Councilman Losleben moved approval of the Septem'ber 7 meeting. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. the minutes o� Cauncilwornan Witt moved approval of the mini the Saptember 21 meeting. Cauncilman Hartmann seconded the motion. l, Losleben ites of Cauncilwoman Witt moved appraval of the can ent calendar as submit�.ed and recommended for approval a part of the regular agenda, along with authorizatio for exec- ution of all necessary dacuments contained herein. l. Approval of the List af Claims dated Oc�ober 5, 1982, and totalling $79,774.79. 2, Acknowledgement af Cade Enforcement monthly repart far September, the NDC4 minutes £or 5eptember 15 and 29, and agendas for September 29 an October 6th, and acknowledgement of the Septembe 2$ Planna.ng Commission meeting, the appaint ent of George Lowe ta the Valunteer Fire Depart ent. 3. Approval of the List of Licenses, granti g la.c- enses to: Bawler Company Gas Pipinq icense Rabert Arendt Con�. General Con ractar Dennis Construction Ca. General Con ractor LandTech Corp. General Con ractar Western Remodeler� General Con ractor Bowler Company Page No. 1721 OctobPr 5 , 198.2 Heating & Air Conditioni.ng Councilman Hartmann secanded the mation. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 EAGLE POINT The Cauncil acknawledged receipt of a letter fram Mr. Ct}NDOMINIUMS Bruce Martin fram Lanvesco Corporation, requesting appraval of a footing and faundation permit for the Eagle Point Cond.ominiums structure. The Council also acknawledged receipt of a memo irom the Code Enforce- ment Officer relating to the Lanvesca reguest. The Cauncil noted that while the letter related to foo�- ing and faundation permits, the Code Eniorcement ��ficer's memo related ta the issuance of a tatal building permit, excluding the swimming poal, pool building fence, etc. There was some question over whether the request was really for the issuance of a footingjfounda�ian permit ar actually for a building permit. No one was present on baha].f o� Lanvesco ta discuss the i.ssue. • Aiter a brie� discussion, Councilmari Losleben moved to apprave the issuance af a faotingJfoundatian permit for the propased 27 unit Eagle Ridge condomi.nium structure. Cauncilwoman Wit� seconded fihe motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 4 DELAWARE The Council acknowledged receipt of a letter and pro- CRC}SSING posed resolution from Mr. Gary Evers on behalf af the Minnesota Federal Savings and Laan Corparation, request- ing Council adoption of a rasolution to suppart a request to the Caunty for abatem�nt of property taxes for Outlats B and C in Delaware Crossing. City Attorney Winthrop advised the Cauncil that the propased resolution had been submitted far his review and that he had made some changes in the document praposed. He advised that the resalution would provide for City support o� a request by the agplicant for the abate- ment af taxes for Outlots B and C upon conveyance af the autlots to the City. Councilman Hartmann moved the adoption of Resolution t, No. 82-$2, "RESOLUTION APPROVING ABATEMENT OF PROPERTY �, TAXES FOR OUTLOTS B AND C IN DELAWARE CRQSSING". Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: d HUNTING/ The Council acknawledged and discussed a memo from TRAPPING Police Chief Delmont supporting the installation of "No Hunting and Trapping" signs at the southern boundary C ` Page No. 1722 October 5, 1982 of the City. It was the concensus of the C direct staff to see that signs are placed a Gentian and Dodd Road, Huber Drive and Dela Blue Gentian and Delaware and at the end of Road. It was also the concensus that the P be authorized to determine whether there is signing at the end of Huber Drive, and also discretion if he determines that two such s necessary for proper site access at Dodd an Gentian. �uncil to : Blue �are , Pagel �lice Chief a need for to use his _gns are l Blue MISCELLANEOUS The Council acknowledged receipt of a memo rom the Code Enforcement Officer relative to the un uthorized installation of an accessory structure at 2 78 Theresa Street. CASE #82-21 CAO 82-03, STANTON Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 & Public Works Director Danielson reviewed fo an application from Mr. Mark Stanton for Mr McBride, for approval of a modified Critica plan along with a variance to allow the co of a 22' x 22' detached garage at 1330 Wach It was noted that the variance is necessary applicant is to be allowed to construct the garage in front of the principal structure property. The Council noted the substantia front yard screening (trees and shrubs), an posed 88 foot setback from the front proper the garage. After discussion, Mayor Lockwood moved;to w requirement for a public hearing on the cri site plan review and at the same time to ap modified site plan. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. the Council John Area site struction ler Avenue. if the detached n the existing the pro- y line to ive the ical area rove the Councilman Mertensotto moved to approve the granting of a variance to allow construction of a 22' x 22' garage in front of the existing principal structur at 1330 Wachtler Avenue in accordance with the site lan received by the City on September 14th. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. HEARING-CASE Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the pu 82-13, COLON public hearing on an application from Mr. Ve for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned U ment of a parcel of land commonly known as t Farm, located on TH 13, west of Miriam Stree Council acknowledged receipt of several staf on the application, a petition in opposition planned unit development proposal, and lette objection from the following: -pose of a -n Colon iit Develop- ie Clemen's .. The : reports to the -s of Page No. 1723 - October 5, 1982 � Evelyn E. Peterson, 5.58 Hiawatha Avenue, James R. Konen, 989 Downing Street, D.R. Heidenreich, 598 Sibley Highway „ John P. Tuohy, 1007 London Road, John P. Gannaway, 590 Winston Court, Clara B. Ruhnau, 591 Hiawatha Avenue, Nancy Kane, 586 Highway 13, and Donald O. Olson, 563 Hiawatha Avenue. CMr. Tim Murnane and Mr. Charles Bartholdi, represen- , tatives of Federal Land Company, were present to represent the Company and present the latest layout for the proposed Mendota Townhomes. Mr. Murnane stated that the layout has changed from the original in various ways, advising that the number of units has been reduced from 16 to 14, the cul-de-sac has been enlarged, and twelve off-site parking stalls have been added. He stated that the changes were made in order to satisfy the concerns of the neighbors, the Planning Commission and the Council. Mr. Murnane stated that the developers believe this was the best method of developing the property and provides the best method for controlling the development of the land. �� Mayor Lockwood pointed out that the City Planners memo addresses the lack of plans for drainage, grading and landscaping. Mr. Murnane responded that the plans presented show the reduction of units but that the developers had asked at the Planning Commission meeting for a continuance to allow preparation of the other plans. He noted that the developer has address- ed topographic and drainage details in previous plans but they have not been incorporated into the current plan. Mayor Lockwood asked Mr. Murnane whether Federal Land plans to get together with the area property owners to try to resolve several differences which remain. Mr. Murnane stated that he would make no committment on what course of action the developer will take. Mayor Lockwood pointed out that although the parcel contains only 5.62 acres of land, it is the last portion of property left to be developed in the area. He noted that there is no real hardship, that the land could be developed as single family. He advised the audience that the Council approved the variance to allow con- sideration of a Planned Unit Development on the under- sized site only as a good faith gesture to make it possible for the developer to put a PUD application before a public hearing at the Planning Commission and City Council. Mayor Lockwood felt that the topography of the site may make this a difficult par- cel to develop, either as single family or townhouse development. He noted that the advantage of townhouse C � � Page No. 1724 October 5, 1982 development is that the City Council and determine all details on unit placement, the structures, appearance, landscaping controls. st ff can he ' ght of nd drainage Planning Commission member Joe Stefani, pre ent for the discussion, reviewed the Planning Commi sion hearing discussion and recommendation for t e Council. Councilman Losleben stated that he believes retains good control over single family dev as well as townhome development, that the control . drainage under either t development, and that he believes the topog the site could make it very desireable for family development. He pointed out that he against the variance because he could see n ship involved: the developer knew the zoni site, the size of the site, and the f act th additional contiguous vacant land was avail the time he purchased the property. Counci Hartmann agreed, and pointed out that the s more difficult for single family developmen Valley View Oak plat and many others. Mayor Lockwood asked for questions and c the audience. Mr. Julian Bilski, 605 Winston Court, advise Council that his property is adjacent to the site. He stated that at the Planning Commis ing, the neighbors stated their position tha would like to see the property remain as sin He noted that the developer can control the design of a single family development as wel townhome development, and that he does not b Mendota Heights _n�eds any additional housing. He pointed out that one of the obj the Planning Commission and City Council in process was to satisfy the neighbors and tha has not been done. He stated that the neigh would like to see the property remain single R-1 zoning. �` Mr. John Tuohy, 1007 London Road, stated tha � development in which he lives, the Ivy Falls Addition, developed by Bream Homes, the deve controlled the structures in every detail, ing where they were located, etc. He noted the City lopment ity can pe of aphy of ingle voted hard- g of the t no ble at man te is no than the ts from the subject ion meet- they le family. rchitectural as a lieve multiple ctives of he entire that orhood f amily, in the 2nd oper nclud- hat the topography of his area is very similar to th proposed development site and that the Ivy F lls West Additions have much greater degrees of slope than the Colon property, and that the developer f Ivy Falls West imposed covenants upon the proper y Page No. 1725 � � ' October 5, 1982 relative to house values and many other details. He stated that he believes that Mr. Colon builds excell- ent single family structures and would do a good job of developing the land with single family structures, but that the neighbors do not want multiple family units.. Mrs. Tuohy said that the PUD proposal would give no flexibility, would be lacking in personality, and further that she believes the PUD concept would be a threat to the values of the surrounding properties. Mrs. Tuohy stated that all of the neighbors are concern- ed that their home values would be negatively impacted by a PUD development. Mr. Ed Abrahamson, 1006 Downing, stated that he was present at the Planning Commission hearing at which time he objected to the proposed storm water holding pond, believing that it creates a hazard. He also asked several questions about drainage from the site. Mr, Jerry Shaughnessy, 572 Miriam, stated that Mr. Colon did try to accommodate many of his concerns. He stated that he has always expressed a concern over property values and that he has had an appraiser come out to his home and has been told that single family structures on the site would increase the value but other types of housing would decrease it. He advised that many of the people in the area are concerned also over potential assessments. He informed the Council that he has had.serious drainage problems since last November when the site was graded, and that the devel- oper would do nothing to resolve the problems. He asked that something be done to resolve the problem. Mayor Lockwood asked whether there was anyone present to speak in favor of the project. He pointed out that the City had received several letters in favor of the PUD concept, noting that many of those respondents were not as close to the development as those people present. Councilman Mertensotto stated that the land has alway� been zoned for single family density, and about a year ago, a PUD application was denied because no hardship could be shown. He pointed out that the developer knew when he purchased the land that it did not meet the size requirement of the PUD ordinance. Subse- quently, the developer came back and asked for a variance from the PUD ordinance, on his own agreement that he could put together a development that the neighbors could support. Councilman Mertensotto pointed out that the problem the Council faces is that it is a parcel that does not meet PUD requirements, and that contrary to the developers assurances to the Council, he has more objections to the PUD concept now than he had before the variance was granted. He noted that the Page No. 1726 October 5, 1982 development would have problems in meeting : and other similar problems which single fam: ment would very possibly not present, and tl are constraints in trying to put this type < ment on such a small parcel. etbacks ly develop- at there f develop- Mr. Bill VanFleet, 1012 Downing Street, sug ested that it is silly to cram so many units into an in- adequate space. He asked how often the res'dents C must come back to listen to a PUD concept. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 EAGLE POINT C Mayor Lockwood asked Mr. Murnane whether th would like more time to prepare additional mation, and asked whether they would like t cussion continued to a subsequent meeting. Murnane advised Mayor Lockwood that�a conti not necessary and that no additional inform would be presented. There being no further questions or comments audience, Councilman Mertensotto moved that be closed, but that the record remain open f to allow written comments to the Council fro not able to attend or to submit comments at ing's meeting, and to allow the Council to t matter under advisement until the October 19 meeting. developers f or- dis- r. ation is ion from the he hearing r ten days anyone his even- ke the h regular There was considerable discussion on the mot'on as stated. Councilman Losleben felt that suffi ient information had been presented and that the earing should be closed without condition. After d'scussion, Councilman Mertensotto withdrew the motion. Councilman Mertensotto moved that the h:ear�-.n closed at 9:00 o'clock P.M., that the Counci matter. under advisement, and that it be plac October 19th agenda. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Mr. Bruce Martin, of Lanvesco Corporation, w� relative to his firm's request for a permit : struction of the first stage of Eagle Point. being advised that the Council had approved � and foundation permit earlier in the evening, requested that a complete permit be issued. that the pool, pool building, sprinkler systE ation and fence enclosing the pool area are t arately bid and that separate permits will bE for those items. be take the on the is present :or con- After i footing Mr. Martin He advised :m install- >eing sep- : requested C raye �v�. 1 /L / October 5, 1982 Councilman Mertensotto moved to substitute "approve the granting of a building permit for the Eagle Ridge Condominiums structure but excluding the pool, pool building, fence enclosing the pool area, and sprinkler system", for the language in the original motion. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ST THOMAS Mr. Jerry Brown and Mr. Pat Casey, representing St. ACADEMY Thomas Academy, were present to request permission to be allowed to complete the roofing and siding on a garage which is being built near the school's athletic field. Mr. Brown explained that, unaware that a permit is required, volunteers began building the structure, and were informed by the Code Enforcement Officer that both a permit and minor conditional use permit are necessary. He asked the Council to grant permission for the volunteers to complete closing of the structure while the conditional use process is taking place, so that the structure's materials are not damaged by the wet weather. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilman Mertensotto noted that Henry Sibley High School had recently constructed a similar structure but went through the total conditional use permit process before construction. He suggested that perhaps per- mission to close the structure before the weather changes could be granted subject to the schools com- pliance with any conditions which may be imposed in the conditional use permit process. After discussion, Councilman Mertensotto moved to permit the school to proceed with the closing of the structure while processing a conditional use permit application with the applicant's understanding that they will have to comply with any conditions of the conditional use permit, if it is granted, and with all building code requirements. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. � COMMUNICATIONS The Council acknowledged receipt of a LMC Action Alert regarding a change in budget guidelines. BONFIRE In response to a request from Russell Hartmann moved to authorize a$225.00 for the purchase of pop and hot dogs Halloween Bonfire. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Wahl, Councilman appropriation for the annual C Page No. 1728 October 5, 1982 LEVY Administrator�Johnson reviewed his memo and resolution on the proposed 1982 Levy, iHe n adoption of the proposed�$979,800 levy woul a 9.5� City tax increase, or, as an example of $9.60 on a residence valued at $94,000. Councilman Mertensotto 20.8% tax increase for felt that there should levy. pointed out that the all agencies is too be no increase over proposed �ted that i result in an increase overall reat and he current After considerable discussion, Councilwoman Witt moved the adoption of Resolution No. 82-83, "RESO UTION APPROV- ING 1982 LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 1983". Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: l, Mertensotto DAKOTA COUNTY The Council acknowledged a memo from the Ci y Adminis- STATE BANK trator advising that the Dakota County Stat Bank will soon celebrate its tenth anniversary. He r commended that, in consideration of its community sup ort over the years, a commendation to the bank would be approp- riate. Councilman Hartmann moved the adoption of R solution No. 82-84, "RESOLUTIUON COMMENDING DAKOTA C UNTY STATE BANK ON ITS TENTH ANNIVERSARY". Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 COMMUNICATIONS The Council acknowledged receipt of a lette from the Metropolitan Council on housing and program for the elderly along with a letter from the Blaine City Man- ager on a Housing Conference to be held on ctober 27th. I-494 TH 149 Administrator Johnson advised the Council t at I-494 will open on November 9th and asked for inp t on what role Mendota Heights should play in the ope ing act- ivities. The Council acknowledged a handout memo on the TH 149/ 110 intersection. AIRPORT Administrator Johnson distributed copies of he NOISE Metropolitan Council's report on Land Use Co patabil- ity withAirport Noise and recommended that a meeting ' with Inver Grove Heights, Eagan and Sunfish ake be held to discuss the report. MISCELLANEOUS The Council acknowledged a memo from Public orks Director Danielson regarding landscaping act'vities at 940 Wagon Wheel Trail. YCtt�t: tVV . 1 t G7 � a October 5, 1982 " � MnjDOT Public Works Director Danielsan reviewad hzs memo MATNTENANCE recommending tha� the City purchase storm sewer pipe, FACILITY to be installed by Mn/DOT, far canstruction of the � City's storm sewer main to the new MnjDOT maintenance facil.ity. He advised that if the Council approves the purchase, the cost wauld later be included in MnjDdT future starm water assessments. He recammended that the purchase of 472 feet af R.C.P. fram Elk River �. . Cancrete be autharized. Mayor Lockwood moved that staff be authorized to purchase 472 feet of 18" R.C.P. from Elk River Cancrete. Councilwaman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ELECTI4N Cauncilwoman Wit�. moved approval of the list of Judges JUDGES o� Election far the 1982 General and Ci�ty Election. Councilman Hartmann seconcled the motian. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MANUFACTURED The City Clerk reviewed a memo and propased amendments HOUSING to the Zoning Orda.nance relating to manufactured housing. She advised that capies have been distributed ta the Planning Commissian for discussion and publi.c hearing. ADJOURN There being no further business to come befare the Caunci.l, Councilrnan Hartmann moved that the meeting be adjaurnad. Councilwaman Witt seconded the motian. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 TiME C?F ADJOURNMENT: 11:45 �'c3.ock P.M. Kathleen M. Swanson Gity Clerk ATTEST: � Robert G. Lockwood Mayar , .�_� _ .�... ........... . .�,.�.. _- _ _. . . _..-__..�. ._ ..,,>�,�,.._._.,... Lept lu-Hamin LepL 5u-xaa�tsriages � �LAIMSY LIST 10/19/82 1x ��T^~� ��-EnSr�� 60-Utilities �' 20-Police 70-Parks CHECK REGISTER 30-Fire 80-Planming 40-Code Enfc 90-Animal Control AMOUiV� V�NDO�t ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. 13.12 C�NTINFNTAL SAFET�EQ MISC 5PLYS �1-43�.5-350r5D 5 ,. ___ ._ 13.i3 _ CONTI{dENTAL_ SAFETYEQ___._____ MISC_SPLYS_._._.______.___. _ . �1-43�.5-i3_70-,7� 5 2b.25 * � 1�39.28 DAKOTA CTY HNY DEPT 45X MN DOT CH6S 10 9 . 2 $ * .� . , _ .. _._._..r� 51�5_.94 _---.---------EL .f4A RK�TING _----- BALIOT CARDS_W. 5� 6 . 9 3 *.- . 387.? 5 FI RE INSTRUCT.OR ASSN _____, Tl2N6 SPL YS __ ._ 3A 7 .'i 5 *.� 173y58�,� INTERSTATE 7ACH-DRIYE RPR i73.58 *� �� 145.67__ ___ __ LA FRANCE _EG1UIi' CORP CO�T - - i 4 5 . 6 7 *,� - ----- ---- - REPU 33.55 * . �.�� T�EAS STATE OF HN FUEL LIC - -- - - - - _ ...__ ___. _._. ^___.._..� -- .--_ - 5 . ^ �R *� - ------- -- - - - - _. __ 17�. b t3 ._ ------- K A TH L E E N S 4�A N S 0 N M I_9/ 13 -�� _.�_.._ 17.6L' *,� _ , 3i� .ri 5__ r�USS E SMITti CO __� __ MISC_ PARTS TANiC TRK 3�-�� 5 * � - - - -- - - - --- ._ i,565.��___ �MC3_T__C/fl EBA __ BAL 83�82 41C PREN _____, 1�665.Yi- � ' , ___ 17.25 _ _ A TO Z _RENTAL CNTR_.____. __._ BELT__ SANDER_ ___._ ___ ._ _ 17 . 2 5 * -- -- - -- - _— _-- � - ----_-- -.�.S�Z.Q - --.---___ . RADTATOR SVC CO__. _ CLEANlRPR RAOIATOR �_...___ : 75.$) 0 *� - 15.�J THE GUN SHOP CLNG PATCHES - 15 . � �J *� - _ _ - - - -� -- -- ---- -- - - _� 75.82 _�___� �ORT ROAO �fO:WE MISC� S�LYS 7 5 . 8 2 *� ------- � - 54-4231-938-4C 1 ,_ 01-430,i�-64D-1�2 1 �1-44�,3-�_30-3X!_ 3 �.1-4330-�Fb3-3G : A � _f�1-4630-03D_-3ii '8 _�,�1-430.�-640 -30 .S t�1-432�-D 5a-5t� 01-441.5-64_'�-1D_ � t?1-433it-460-3�i 3i D1-4247-117-2t!-- � C�I- 42Q.fl-613-7Q_,El � 15-4330-49D-b�.51 01-441D-;20-2� 01-433�-49�a5C 8�10.;'lJ EAGLc POINT DEV CO REF ESCRO� EAfPTPlfO 1fl1-2124-OS�Q-�D - ------ -- - - - --- -- --- - -- - - 5�Ji2.JQ EAGLE POiNT DEV CD ^REF 0/CSAC/41AC#4543 ^^ � � D,3-33's2-,1DD-D.D 1�3��3� *,� - -�- -• - - ---- _.....�_--------- ---- --.---__ _�--__...__ .._. ___ _.._ . _ _. 49Q.5� SOLIOIFICATIflN INC SEAL SAN SI�R LINE 49C.5� *- 65 .;� 0 Bi1LLS EYE REl.'OA DING RELOA DS oS.J�; *._, � 15-4337-475- 6t3 � t�i-434.5-�20-2U AMOUNT - - - -- - 6 . ;3 2. __ _ 48.47 32 .� 2 6.17- 92.51 *.� VENDOR CHECK REGISTER ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCflUNT N0. INV. _ARTSI.GN_MAT£RI_ALS_ __ __ ARTIST TAPE __.._____ _�___a��-_430<A-11.�-.___.�_.E ARTSIGN MATERZALS LETRAASIGN/�I�1YL �Ji-43Dt1-640-1U f �RTS.IGN MATERIALS LETRASIGNILTRS 01-43��D-643-18, � ARTSIGN MATERIALS PKG TAPE 0.5-43J.0-105-15 f 2.95 BD �IAT�R COMMISSION 2431 LEX 41-4425-31J.-5il 2.95 BD �IATER CDMMiSSION 2431 LEX O1-4425-31D-7� - - -- — --- - - - •- � ------- --- --- �- --.._ .-- --- ------� ----- --- - -- - - ---- -- .. ...- - -- - aD.13 6D �A TER COMMISS10�1 1T8�.Lil.AC fli-4425-470-70.. 2.94 SD IJA TER Ct3MNISSION 2431 LEX 1�-4425-31�-6fl -- 1r52ti�.86�__----�D .f�ATER COMMISSIflN_ �9UYE HDR' I.EX&MtH•RD _,_, 63-446D-904-`QD � 16.61 BD S�AT�R COMMiSS�ON AUG E(VGR TIHE 7�-4231-951-CO � 1�586.44 *� �.6t� ---�— BRO�1N__PHOTO _� PHOTO FINIS�1i�1G ___ L1-43Q�- 1�2Q=2D : 4�6Q *� 38.1n CHAPIN PUBLISHINs CO AD FOR PROPOS 9l24 �1-424�-113-1�i 3 -- --� 3 8 . 3 i3 *� _�._---- - - - ----- ----------�-------�--_. _ 3 8 ..� 8 -- -- -- - 15.9s� -- -�------� 4 . 9 3 - - -._._ 5.66 33.78 ___ 38.18 24.58 69.33- ..__.__._ 5 i? . 7 3 �- - � 40..59 252�3� *.�� CITY NOT4R SU.�PLIf THINNERIPRIHER �1-43Ct.5-@5�•5t3 l CITY MOTOR SUPPLY ROTORS CUT ti1-433ilr44p-2J ] CITY MOTOR SUPPLY BRAKESlSEALS ti1-433D-49'3r,2tl.l -�--CiTY N�OiOR SUPPLY �-�--V GASKET ��.��.~�--.._v. D1-433f�-4b0-30 1 CITY NOTC�R SUPPIY M3SC PARTS 01-4330-49Q-5�0. ] CITY MOTOR SU�PLY NISC PARTS {?1-4330-49Qr5ti l CITY MOTOR SUFPLY GATES � 81�-433D.-�9Q-54 3 CITY �OTOR SUPP�'l AAJ ON PARTS p1-4330-49Q-5�.7 __,CITY MOTOR StlPPL� PADS/SEAI.S ROT;DR CUT �__ f�2_4330-49Q��54�] CZTY MOTOR SUPPLY PI�E/CIAMPS �1-4330-490-50 l ._2,�95.�9 ,_.�___. CaMMISS OF. REVENUE_____ BAL_3RD OTR .Si IJ/_N�____..___t31-.2i�b1-4.1��-0�i 2�195.09 *� 74.15 CGNT� L CR CORP OCT P�X�IT b1-4210-020-2�3 C 118.65 CON7E L CR COR� OCT PYMT Oi-4210-11fl-1�l. C - - - _ _._._..._.______ . ---�- - - ---- --- -- --------- ---_.,._._��.._-----_..______ ___�_____.. ._ __ _.- ._-- - �------- -�----�------ 59.32 CONTE L CR CORP �OCT PYMT 05-4210-105-1� 0 252.1 2 • � 13.79 COPY EQUI� CO SPLYS C4LDN PUD ,, r1-2125-�.00-�.� CHECK REGISTER � AMOUNT VENOOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOU�IT N0. INV 12.333 CflPY EQUIP CO MISC SPLYS n5-43�.fl-105-15 . - --�.23.3I__._._.___ _ CO�Y__EflUIP--CQ -------.-------_ ._SIUELINE ----- ._.__._._.____ _..._ .... ti5.-43p��-1D5-1� _ 4 9 .4�f1� * � � 23.38 DAVIS ELECTRONIC SlIC RPi25/PARTS 01-433Q-450-3 ___,____ 10.?C_._ .__, DAVIS ELECTRDNIC SVC_ _RPR y „__ 01-433�-45Dr� 33.38 * 51.4� ELVGREN PAINT SUPPLY PAINT Di-�#3�7.5-D,TD-7 51.4Q * � - -. �62.67 ---� b2.67 -_.__ 5 2. 6 6 �- b2.66- 62.66 - -1�8.Jfl *-✓ 51.3 �- 159.9D 18.�D- 3 2 6. 4 5--- 4i7..35 * � FME C 0l2P �ME CaRP f �IE C GRP FME C OR'P FME CORP -- �PaSTA GE --- - _— ___. POSTAGE HCH MTCN POS7A.GE I�CiH H3CN CORR PROG POSTAGE MCH �iTCN GOA CORPi�RATION ±GOA CCRPORATIQN GOA C ORPdRAT i ON _--_-_ -- GOA CORPORATICN fl�1-433Qr11D-1� � 01-433tD-�9Dw 20 .;' _ fl5-433�t-1_ 5-�.5 � Q5-4330-105-15 .i � 05-4330-490-35 i -�- - � - ----- ----�--_ CR RETNO MTS A1VTI FREEZE CR RETD MTS _ OI l/GREASElT RAI�SN7D . . .�. 01-1210-�.09-0.ir_' . �}1-2210-OOD-fl�! � {11-121 il-0,00_.-� �ii- C21-121D-D,�0-t10�1 � 1r125.�� ------- IDS_ L IFE__INS_ CO --• ----OCT ANNUI_TY------__._.._. .� _ Q�._-2072-3.00-0 - -1i125..G0 * ^ - - - �- � 3.52 KNUTH TOM 34.76 _ _ _ KNUTH TOM _ 10.78 !(iJUTH TOM� 11.22 KNUTH'TOM 19�Si� KNUTH <TOM 8�.v.8 *� 27.3<6 1+�6 __ -�8.a2 * �� KUL.LANDER GUY KULLANDER_ GUY . ; ' MI 9/30.-10�i3� 4 D.5-4415-105-15 MI 9/3D-13,�13 63-4415-8�03-DR3� __.-� -- - - - - - --- --- - -- _ -- MI 9/3D-10l13 - - �-- f 63-4415-8D4-31#Sj M I 9/ 3fl.-1 Q/ 13 T$- 4415-8 �.1 • 41 �1�;. MI 9/3t3-3f3�1 3 �9-44i 5-8Q2�Q��: MI 9121-10 JB MZ 9l21-10/8 4.'i 9 L�EF E�ROS INC SE�'T SVC 05-4415-105•1 __._ _.?s-aa� �-a��-� O1-a335-310- CHECK REGIS7ER AMOUNT . VENDQR.. _._ _ ___ _.___ ITEM _DESCRIPTZON . ACCOUNT_ N0._INV�. 4.Q.8 LEEF BROS INC SEPT SVC 01-4335-310� `�5 ______._ 4+�3.8___,_�..___LEEF BROS INC _ SE�T 8VC __ _�_�_, 01�4335-31Q_-` '6 4.:3.8 LEEF BROS INC SE�7 SVC U1-4335-310-7D °6 4.3,$ l�"tF BROS INC SEPT SUC 01-4335-31�-70 `6 ..4_.�' 9_ _ _ ___ L�E� BROS _ INC _ ._ _ _ ___SEPT SVC_ _ . _ . . �. �1-4335-31U-70 5 4.�8 LEEF BROS INC S�PT SVC 15-4335-310-60 6 4.�9 LEEF BROS INC SEPT SVC �5-4335�31D-fi0.6 �4<._�.8 ,__,�� tEEF 8ROS INC._ _ S�PT SVC _ _� 15-4335-31J�b+D . 5 _..__ 36.75 * / 47i�.1D MEO CNTR hpEALT�i .�NS �!}� 10/i �R n1-2�79�fl:OD�-aA_ 5�F5.+45_� M,ED C�ITR H£AL,T� OC :T. INS PREH ��, .�31-4245-�.2Dx2�T � � 214.45 � MED CNTR HEALT� OCT INS PREM �01-4245-�21-�0 3'�4+95 M�D CNTR HEALTH OCT INS PREN 01-4245-�.5�-5Q 2�J8.90 MED_ C�1'R HEALTH OCT INS PREM ________._._ _. _01-4245-Q.�TD-70�_, --- -- 363.85 -------- M�0 CfVTR HEALT#'! --- T DCT INS PREM� 01-4245-1.��1-'10. 42fl,45 MED CNTR HEALi!H �JC7 INS PREM D5-�#2�5�-105-15 �i�:.�D,::, MEU CNTR HEALTH OGT: INS. _PREM __ 15-4245-?.S�J-SO; 2, 813.15 *.� 17.b7 ME1VD HGTS RU89ISH SEPT SYC C33-428t3-310!-50 .3 17.57' HEND t�GTS R1�88iSH SEPT SVC 01-4280-31D`�'� .3 17.6b � MEND HGTS RlfBBISH SEPT SVC 15-428c�:31De 3 22.1(3 MtNO HG7S RUSSI SH SEPT �VC 15-4330-41�r_ b+� 6 b5.Q � * ---- -_ _._.- -� �-� --___ � - - _... -� - - -�--- --�---�---._._..___— _—_-------- - - - 7.6� ` MINN DEPT OF RtV SPEC FUEL T1�X SEPT ��~ �31-4320-050-5i3 7.60 * � _ Sb.��.. _ MINN MININGBHFG __ BtlR6 ALH CULLIGAN ! 15-933Q-�Q3#6�_2 b 6 . 0 �3 *.�' - - 14[f..��J MINN TEAMST£R-LOC320. OC7 DUES D1-2Q�5-D.D��D: ia�.o� *: � , . , - -- - -- -- - - --_ . -- -- - _....._... __ -___ .�_. . __ ._.- - - ---------------�- -- 84.98 NOR7NERN ST` POWER' CO OCT SVC 84.97 NORTNERN ST°pflliER CO ' OCT SYC . - ----- _.48.23-----__._._.____. NORTWERN`ST 'PO�IER. C�__,.,,__� OCT SVC 38.1b NORTNERN ST PONER CD OCT SVC 217.80 (VORTIIERN ST POW.ER CO OCT SVC 47.4D NORTHERN ST POWER CO OC7 SVC � *+7.41 NORTHERN S�T PO�IER C0� OCT SVC 69..25 NORTHERN ST POW�R CD OCT SVC -- � -- -01-4211-31�-5D..� �1-�►2�1-31�.��7Q� II1-42i�1-315��30. �__..._.�_...----Q;- 4211-32D - 70 D1-4211-420� Cf1-4212-31Q-_ � �i—a2i 2—�-io-�o .. v1-�212-315-�� i r�----- CHECK. REGISTER AMOUNT VENOOR 91.2t! NOR7H£RN ST P041ER C� ---.----. -84.98 _..._._..�._..._ NORTHERN_ST Pa�1ER CO---- 169.34 NORZ1iER(V ST P041ER CO 47.40 NORTHEftN ST PQ1J�R CO _ �81.!3.3 --# i--- __- --- --__ _._ _ .�.- � 2�A .74 2A .74 +�� 241.9fl , � « 2a1.9Q * 45.22 4��2 45.21 135.65 *� 55.i8 � �52.50 15.�C+7 _17.70 __. �41.75 � 367.43 15?.4Q * ITEM DESCRZPTION ACCDUNT N0. IN11 - --- - - --- -_ _- ._.. . . ---. . .. �- OCT SUC il1-4212-32fl-?0� OCT SVC ___�___ � � 15-4211-31a-6R , OCT SVC 15-4211-400-6t� OCT SVC 15-4212-314-b0 - �--- - - - -- - --- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -� PAYLESS CASHIiAYS INC L8R PRICE ELECTR IC I�1C. �R'�ICE `£LECTRIC . ZNC �RiCE ELECTRIC INC S&7 OFFICE PR.OD S&T OFFICE PRDD S&_T D�FICE PROD ---_- -- SAF�CD LIFE INS CO GE LITES �G�°LIiES GELITES MYSC=OFFiCE SPLYS BNDRS /CAL REFILLS PE NS 41AND STAMMPS_ _ ___ OCI PREMM 01-93Q.5-07D- l1-4Q►22-� . . .� 01�-4335�=31'� -�54: >• Q1=#33�-�Y�'-7iI� r 15-4335-31�-60.. Qi-43i�d!-�.�9 �5f� G1-43Q.0-. 114.-1�� . O1- �3R.�-110..-1�. ._G1-43Q:5-350-5Qi _ (11-4246-� 3l r3U�� _..��__ _�.___ � . � , , � 31.R 7 SATEL�ITE INDUST INC BAL RENT ROG LAKE 01-42�.i3-610-70i 31.�7 * > 3.96 " SNYOER ORUG STORES 8Ai'TERIES Ofi-43iY:5��20�2�°. i3..88 SNYDER DRUG STQRES FI�M Ol-�+3tl.5-02D ,r2i�� 6.87 S�lYDER DRUG STORES FILM �1�-43ti:5-U23..r20�. 13.88 SNYDER DRUG STORES F3LM Q1-430.5-D2J-2�#. 12.95 � T SNYDER DRUG STDRES � 8Ai7ERIES/FILM 0•Y-A3ti;5-.D°.3Qr.3�.k.. 7.29 SNYDER DRUG STORES FLASl�LI6�IT 15-.43D.5-Db0-fiDN 57..SS ,��. -- _. ._. _._._.__ ----._.--.---------. .---- -_,.____...__. ___� ._ _. _.__... ._ _.�_ __.__ _._. _ ._r. ____.____.._ ._,___ �� 46U.5a, � SOIL £1(PLORATIflN CO � SUBSURFACE EXPLOR 46�..b�? *� - - ----- - 79-423b-.602-� 0 . CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT UENOOR _.. ITEM DESCRIPTION 1�3.15 SOUTHVIEI� GARDEN CTR FERTILIZER 3.0�3 SOUTHUIEW GARpEN CTR SOD 3.75��_. �_i..��-SOUTHUIEW GARDEN CTR T SOD ---- -- -�--^---- - 1� 9.9Q *� 3fl.87 STARR OFF SV CS 34 .87 *- HISC SPLYS __ ACCOUNT �NO. _I_NV 01-43Q.5-070�70 i5-4330-480-50 �.74-4460-943r0 0 . 01-430.�i-D 20-20 - - -1 � 73D.53 ----� ST TREAS PERA PERA ` �t/H : l0 Q,/1 PR -��---fl'1-2tlb2i?.DD-.UD .' 1�098.4.Dn - ST TREAS PER.A � �ERA:2�/..1. P_R 01-�40.5-�2D:�20... r_i 13�55., ST TREAS P�ERA P�AA .1011 'PR ; 0�3-.�RD:6�fl�i-20..� �424.80 ST TREAS PERA pERA 1311 PR �.1-4405-9.21�-20 15.50... ST TREAS P�ERA' PERA iD11 PR �fll-44C:6�.3i:_3Qr:3Q . 48.60 ST 7REAS PERA PERA 10 /i PR 01�443b�l::.4D-4D . ---. .__--293�20 , ___�__ ST TREAS PERA � PERA 10��11 PR----- -L�3-a40'.�-��i,5Dk 50�w , i05.52 ST tREAS PER,A •, P.£RA' 1�J:1�I f'R 'i�I�44�:b�4.'�kT�':�t�w 130.4.� . ' ST TREAS t�€RA PERA ,:iII�3 PR �.i31+-44t�«6-i.3t�'�'�� . 160.16 ST TREAS PERA PERA 1D /1 PR Q1-440.6-11U-10 . 249.24 ST TREAS PiERA PERA 1D�2 PR fl5-44D.S-105�`1�5 62.62 ST TREAS PERA �PERA 10�1 �R 15-44p,b-Db0-6fl_ 4 �23�..6� #�_ __.__...___--.- -_ __.__.___ ____.�- ---------------�_.__.�._- -.----------- ..__... 1 2.72 SUN N EIiSPAPERS NOT HEAR EAG POI NT 01-4240-�:8J-�80 '. -- _- 13.51 _�_____._ SUN_NE�ISPAPERS-.-._ .`.��_ NUT BUDGET }�EAR--_ ---- _-.--01-42�D�-1i�=1U.' � i.�7 SUN NE�ISPAPERS NOT PU8 NEARY .02-�424ii'-110=i0..' 9.18� SUN NE�IS�APERS NOT TAB OF RALLOTS ti1-424�-64��-1D : ____�__ b.4i _ SUN NESJSPAPERS �IOT OFFICIAL TEST . t3i-�+24�-6�+�-.Z.II.'. 7.52 SUN NEWSPAPERS f�OT FILING AFFIDAVIT 01-424Q-64�J-10 ! 56.47 *� �:� . . . ... ___ 30:d.�.; TYIN CITY iES7IN6 CYL TEST _ � 78-4231-80I-ti0 � 3 U ..�7 Q * � 2�} 7.75 � UNIFORH� UNl"IMI TED SHIRTS/PAN�S REYES' 01-4410-D 2Q:-2D :: _ 79.,�.5 •UNIFORHS_ UNLIHITED BOt3TS/MACE.H�.flRARNDT 01�4410�D+20�2D_� _ 286.A0 * 6�D .0•i�_ri UN I1� OF M INN ' RE�R R L ITER SK.� 01- 44�,�-Q 7� �7t� r: _ 6�i .+�D �__, UN IV OF H INN -_.- --RESR T OLUAID _:_�._._----.----- 1.5-�4��3-i160-�0.:: ._.._.._._ _-- 12D.3D * ,_ � 1�00�9•.J.O... ZIEGLER IMC LABOR/RPR/PARTS t31-433D-493.-5Q 1 CHECK REGZSTER � AMOUN� VENDOR ITEM DESCR�PTION ACCOUNT N0. INV -- - -- - ---- ----- -- _ . --- - --__...---- - �--� � �-- - - - =� ---- -� - - - _ --___ — ---- � -- -- ----- - -_ __-_ . _ _ . - --- --- _ __ . 8�7.66 ZiEGLER INC LAB�RlRPR/PARTS �1�433D-49�-74� �.847..56 * / , � 1� �767.24 - -�----500.�0 ----� �54�.�13 .___ 1 + 2 71 <.19 1 � 566.4Q lt� 9..2 S i 3.75 �-- -- -- — — -- - . .�fi.61 E 42�98 "; ' 4 84� .4 0 :� 23�611.88 MANUAL CHECKS FUND O1 TOTAL __�_______ _____�____ __ TFUfVO 03 TOTAL ' FUfVD �0.5 TOTAL FUN D i'5 TO T Ar FUND 63 70TAL' FIfND 64 T�TAL' FUN 0 74 TO T AL ______..______ �'UiVU 77 TOTAL FI�ND ?8 TO�AC �UND 79 TflTAI:';. � TOTA L 10143 500.00 Refill Postage Meter U S Post Office 10144 244.32 3rd Qtr Swr Bill Postage " -' - ' `--70145- --"2;74�5� "R:E:`Tax&Spec Assess --�Gold�"Meda-Il:ion/Da�ron-C"o'rp �--� 10146 850.00 Appraisal.I�laple Pk Ct Robert St. Hutchinson 10147 580.00. Payroll Deductions 10/1 State Capitol Cr Un i��T6�$-�06. D ota ty B 10149 4,733.92 FIT W/H 10/1 PR Director Int Rev 10150 18,849.05 Net Payroll 10/1 City MH Payroll Acct - - _ __I.�1�1 ,—'----VOID'------- -•------�_�_.—._..------- ---------� - --_ -- -�-- 10152 40.45 Fall Conf MIAI Gene Lange 28,743.30 $ 52,355.18 GRAND TOTAL CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES FOR CITY COUNCIL APPR.OVAL - OCTOSER 19TH, 198 Doty & Sons, Inc. Turner Excavating Westonka Sewer & Water, Inc. Joseph R. Card Construction Co., Inc. Robert W. Compton, Inc. Masterpiece Kitchen's & Construction Quality Builders Greg Tauer Construction Co., Inc. Scandia Stucco Company Excavating License Excavating License Excavating License General Contractor's License General Contractor's License General Contractor's License General Contractor's License General Contractor's License Plastering/Stucco License CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO October 13, 1982 T0: City Council FROM: Edward F. Kishel City Engineer SUBJECT: Mn/DOT SupplemPntal Agreement Approval of the attached Resolution No. 82-, is requested and recom- mended. It covers reimbursement of funds expended by the City in t e matter of disconnecting a segment of eight inch watermain on the west end i the proposed Wagon Wheel Trail bridge over Highway 35E by the St. Paul ater Department. It also includes the installation of a valve in prepar tion for by-passing the bridge with a watermain crossing. The resolution will authorize the Mayor to sign Supplemental A�reement No. One to Agreement No. 60804. � CITY OF �1ENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION N0. 82- RESOLUTION APPROVING SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEP�ENT N0. ONE TO RELOCATION AGREEMENT N0. 60804 WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR EIGHT INCH WATERMAIN CUTBACK AT WAGON WHEEL TRAIL AND PROPOSED I-35E (IMPROVEMENT 82 PROJECT 4) WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has presented Supplemental Agreement No. One to the City relative to cutback of the City's eight inch watermain in Wagon Wheel Trail to allow room for excavation of the bridge glory hole; and WHEREAS, said Supplemental Agreement has been reviewed by the members of the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council o,f the City of Mendota Heights, P4innesota, as follows: 1) That the Supplemental Agreement No. One described above be and the same is hereby approved. 2) That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of Mendota Heights and deliver the same to the State of Minnesota. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 19th day of October, 1982. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk Y hiENDOTA HExGHTS FTRE DEPARTMENT i MONTHLY REPORT i Fire Ca11s No. 82-90 Thru 82-94 Number oi Calls � Manth o''' sept ��g 82 FIRE ALARMS DISPATCHED t � TYPE � NO. STRUGTURE C4NTENTS MISC. ' TC?T LS TO DATE . ; Commercial � 5,000 � Re'sidencial ' 2,400 Vehicle Fires ' 2,400 ContraCt Fires (AII ) 2 �aQ ��a Vehicle AcCi.dents $ nane $ none s nane Monthl Loss Tofieals Men.Ht s Rescue { no �ire ) 2 A1]. Fires All Areas $ $ 1 0,300 � Grass, Brush&No Va�1ue Men Hgts Only Struct/Content'si �►�� False Alarm Criminal Mer� Hg�s On�.y Miscellaneous ; 2,400 False " Commercial Men Hg�s Total Loss ta Date $ 9,800 False " Residencial 1 B�LLTNG FOR SE'RVTCE Good Intent Calls � Aqency 'This�Mont To Date TOTAL CALLS 5 Mn : DOT . Nane �' Lt�CATTON �F FIRE ALARMS To Date Last Yr. Milw RR 1 Mendota Heights 3 82 94 CNW RR � ; Mendota 2 8 Others ' � Sunf ish Lake � � �1 i TOTALS $ � $ � �7 • Q� Lilydale 1 4 11 � �ther � FIRE MARSHAL�� TIME OR MQNTH TOTAL � �� 2� Tnspections 1 2 WORK P��RFORMED Hours Ta Date Last Yr� Investiga�ions j a Fire Cal].s 42 1�12 1642 ! F.ire Calls i 2 Meetings �n ��a �� . . ; Dr.ills 50 433 495 Meetings 2 Weekly Clean-Up 25 2�5 218 Drills, Training 2 Special Trai.ning 18 229 2'75 23 • Miscellaneous lmi.nistrative ].8 184 184 � Fire Marshal 31 „ �43 321 Total. � ��- TC?Tr�L5 214 3090 3393 Remarks : See other s�. e of this shee� for mon�hly Syn psi:s . .y � 1 FIRE RUNS: Runs for the month of September were limited to five calls. Two of the calls were rescue calls, the first was a request by police for assistauce at a heaft attack. The victim was a 17 year old girl from Ivy Falls Addition. The second rescue call was an accident on the Mendota Bridge. �Ve received two contract calls, the first was at the old Lilydale Marina were an abanded house boat was engulfed in flames. The second was a clothes drier call in Sunfish Lake, there was no damage from fire. The only structure call in Mendota Heights was to Ivy Falls for "smoke alarm". Owner had started fire in fireplace and did not open.the damper. The alarm system tripped and we were called $�!athe alarm company. TRAINING: The monthly training time was used to drill with the department's foam equipment. We used up some out-dated foam received from one of the refineries. � The foam injection equipment installed last year on pumper 2281 was used along with the portable ea_uipment. Five members of the department attended a mutual aid drill at Cottage Grove during the month. The drill was held at one of the local schools and envolved students as victims. { r . ` FIRE DEPARTMENT MON`1'EiLY WUf2K PL•'RFUftMANCE I Mon h , 19 Calls for Fire Fire Per- Month- Clean 13us. Off'r Spec Other Othe Month 5 Calls Calls cent ly Up Meet Meet llril Act'y Act' Year Total Att' d Att' d Att' d Dri 11 in in �o�"�'` R 6'""" g 9 Mutul,� q� Mus � x R � Date _`` . Month Year Year Hrs1, Hrs Hrs I-Irs I�irs Hrs Hrs i ...oack, L. . Chie 2 6 6o y x Admi -- � — ---.�..- -•- �- - -- - •- • � ----- -,� ---- -•- Pe erson D.Rsst. • Hrs . _.. �_� .3._..... _..�- /8 ..._ �----- --�- �- � ��=__. .__.__._ �_ ....__: _� _ ' a t.Bill Ler.bs i 1 ,�7 3 . Will Wacht er .2a a.3 Paul Dreelan 0 S7 )c � x � John Maczko .� y�� . Mike Blechinge� �/ y Mike Coonan . a 3� x ; , Gordv Sk j erven �� U� S/7 x :� � y 0 Jeff Stenhau Dick Zwirn John Lapakka Stu HenninQ Jim Kilburq �pt . Bruce ev� n i i zi �- Geor e Noack S Q 37 Gerald Nelson �� 0 3 37 Lambert Derks 0 �o y3 Ted Husnik / D y3 Jamie Lerbs o _�6 Mike Maczko 0 , �s � N a. . ... .. ..y Tom Weinzette Marc Conno y Tom Olund John Neska Steve ar son Ken Noack Total Attended 5 - Tot. Man Hours So T is M L M n ver. RunsPerMan /, 5��, er MenPer Ru � ko i3•�D �Hver_X for Year �S. 03 � �G•�7 �� y �st Ygs � -� � � , z -•- so.io � Mus�'�z irv � C1TY OE' MI�NIX7't'A EIl•:1 �i1'("�, 'i'RLA �U!<l:k R1.F�o?i•C - September, 1982 Dahuta Cc�unt'y ti�,il�• it.inr Ctie��k i �yc� Ac.cv�ar�t Savings Account C.D. Uue Rev. 5h�ring Savir�yt� S��cial J'ol ic:� S,.lviny:; 4-1-83 @ 9.737� C,��t�. l� ui�d S��ec. :>av i ny:c 2'OTAL Ca1laCeral -- Bottds 150,000.00 Govt. Guar. I��.��•�� Cherokee State Bank C.a. Uue ZQ-4-82 @ 14.5� 300,004.4Q C.D. Due 11-6-82 @ 13 3/4� 100,000.00 C.D. Due10-12-82 @ 13� 300,OOQ.00 C.D. Due 2-9-83 @ 12$ '325,0OO.Od S��ec. Park Savings3-$-83 @ 13,952.59 10.I23� 'PQTRL Ca3laterai - Bon�.�s 1r3QQ,000.00 Govt. Guar. ��O,Opp.00 Signal I�ills State Bank C.D. Uuu 'POT�'? L C�IlatLr�al - i3c�n�.i.c 640,000.00 Govt. Guar. 1QO,OOQ.00 Minnesata State Lank C.D. Uue Collatcral - t;ovt. Guar. Mini�csota Federal Jt�V1I14�j & Loan �. i?. �t1G' 1.2—�.�—$� � a.{i� �3$ Col2ateral - �',,ovt. Guar. 1 t ti a 1 a i,� �: ------� _._ $1b , 71.4 . 78 338.27 25,OOQ.00 42,053.05 r 1,038,952:59 � �VO j VUU �tl� I r'irst National t3}�zk af St. Paul C.D. Due 12-2�'8� @ g•65� 1Q0,000.00 10-2-82 @ 9.�� 3p0,000.00 � � l�-I2-82 @ I3�� 600,000.00 Collatcsra - I�onri�; 1,00O,OOQ.00 1,OOp,00Q.00 Govt, �uar 100,000.00 ' U.S. Treasury F�ills j �u� 2-23-$3 @ I4.23$ {87.8996) $225,000.00 197,774.10 Repa due 10-11-82 40,000.00 'I'C)Tl+.i. C•'UNUS AVATL,N.fL►?: $2,41,8,779.74 Caliar.era2 1,40Q,000.00 740,000.00 � � f f t � �, 1,100,400.OQ 1�. Shau�yhna:��.y NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE , COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION , � c/o C(ty Offices 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 I. II. IV. NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE CONIMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FIILL COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 6, 1982 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Dave Zemke at 7:35 p.m� The following Directors �ere present: Baird- Sunfish Lake Boelter- Mendota Hanson- West St. Paul Walker- West St. Paul EXCUSED•ABSENT: Harrison- Sunfish Lake Kinney- South St. Paul Zemke- Mendota Heiglits Witt- Mendota Heights Lanegran-South St. Paul Tatone- Inver Grove Heigh Henderson- Inver Grove Hei UNEXCUSED ABSENT: Beaird- Lilydale Goad- Lilydale Bruestle-Mendota Also present were John Gibbs, legal consultant,. Rollie Crawford, Anderson Attorneys, Deb Schultz, Crawford and Anderson Attorneys, Group W Cable, and Jane Salen, staff secretary. Lanegran made a motion to approve the agenda of October 6, 1982, Baird. Motion carried unanimously. ts and Karns, : . Lanegran made a motion to accept the minutes of September 29, 1982,Iseconded by Baird. Tatone moved to correct on VI a, Evaluation Criteria and Priori sentence; "under Financial Management to underscore the words The sentence will be corrected to read, "under Financial Manag line under local ownership indicating that the discussion has s This motion was seconded by Baird, motion carried unanimously. A motion was made by Hanson to adopt the minutes as amended, se Motion carried unanimously. Recital regarding communications to the Board. Lanegran's ownership". we draw a . there"• by Baird. MCCB sent minutes from their meeting September 10, 1982. � � Robert Zeller, from MCCB, sent ae�,0atober 1, 1982 memorandum.� The s bject was, Recorxsideration of the Proposed Cable System:Multiple Dwelling Unit Access Rules. Baird moved that the Commission accept the communications, seconded Motion carried unanimously. by Boelter. -2- V. Ownership Committee Report. Tatone moved that the Commission receive the Ownership Committee minutes of September 29, 1982, seconded by Hanson. Motion carried unanimously. Tatone discussed the recommendations from the minutes of September 29, 1982. Baird made a motion to accept recommendations A thru E under Alternatives. :..Lanegran moved to strike alternative E as worded, seconded by Walker. Aye: Henderson, Lanegran, Walker Nay: Baird, Tatone, Witt, Hanson, Boelter, Zemke Henderson said for the record that he opposed alternatives A thru E. Tatone made a motion to amend the wording in the alternatives A and D. In alternative A, to delete the words "percentage of stock", adding the word "interest". Also to delete the words "of dollars". Also to add the word°"any" in front of local investors. The sentence should read, "Reject all proposals of applicants which include a financial structure whereby the interest held by any local investors is greater than the percentage actually invested". In>alternative D, to delete the words "readily or" changing the sentence to read, "reject all proposals of applicants which provide that the interests of local owners can be bought out at a guaranteed price". Tatone's motion was seconded by Baird. Those in favor of accepting the amendments on alternatives A and D: Aye: Tatone, Hanson, Witt, Boelter, Zemke, Baird Nay: Walker, Lanegran, Henderson Baird� moved' to subs£itizte the� word "interest"' in place of �"stock"�' nn alternative B, seconded by Tatone. ' � - , '. .. '' Nay: Walker, Lanegran, . . - � � Aye: Tatone, Hanson, Baird, Zemke, Witt Boelter Abstained: Henderson The Commission voted at this point to accept the amended alternatives A thru E. Aye: Tatone, Hanson, Baird, Zemke, Witt, Boelter Nay: Walker, Lanegran, Henderson Tatone moved to accept the recommendations of the distribution of the frar�chise,. doc'uments: • Secanc�ed by.. Baird. � . . ' , Lanegran moved to add a#5.in the recommendations of ihe distribution of the ' franchise documents. 5. To include distribution to Dakota County Library and the South St. Paul Library. Aye: Lanegran, Henderson, Walker Nay: Hanson, Tatone, Witt, Boelter, Baird, Zemke - " -3- V. Ownership Committee Report continued. On:,the distribution of the franchise documents discussion,l�anegran #2 , say.ing "one copy per city" : � , � .. -' ' , . ,, �:. . . y_ ,- ,. �' Seconded by Hanson, motion carried unanimously. � All those in favor of the recommendations as amended. Aye: unanimous Tatone moved to accept notification of the RFP to be published in Seconded by Baird. � Lanegran made a motion to delete #l. "To put public notice in the S Dispatch and the St. Paul Pioneer Press°. Seconded by Zemke. Aye: Zemke, Lanegran, Witt, Hanson, Henderson, Walker { Nay: Tatone, Baird, Boelter ; A motion was then made to adopt th� recommendations as amended,. Aye: unanimous � Tatone discussed the recommendations on A. Expenses in the Herbst Franchise Matters. dated September 23, 1982. Tatone made a motion to accept the recommendations 1 thru 4, Motion carried unanimously. � to change newspaper. Paul randum on by Walker. Tatone made a motion to accept the option of 90 days in B, Deadline �or Submitti Applications. Seconded by Boelter�•motion carried unanimously. On C, Method for Submitting Proposals, Tatone made a motion that 1 accepted. Seconded by Henderson, j Zemke moved to add #4,"Executive summary to be supplied to each Consultant and Counsel". i Seconded by Lanegran, motion carried unanimously. � ; All those in favor of the recommendations as amended. � Aye: unanimous - � � � Tatone discussed Hearing, Evaluation and Selection Procedures in the Franchise Matters memorandum of September 23, 1982. ; Tatone made a motion to adopt the suggested provisions 1 thru 4. Se� Abstained: Lanegran, Walker Motion carried. Tatone proceeded to discuss E, Rules of Application Procedure. ` , Baird made a motion to accept 1 thru 6, seconded by Witt. Motion • 3 be Lssion Director, IHerbst by Witt. ried unanimously. -4- VI. Continue discussion of open issues. The discussion was led by John Gibbs, legal consultant. The discussion opened with the Adrian Herbst memorandum of October 4, 1982, Obscenity and Regulation of Cable Programming. Tatone made a motion to adopt option #l. Option #1 r.eads as follows; Make no provision regarding obscenity in the RFP or the franchise ordinance. Allow state law to govern. Seconded by Baird. Motion carried unanimously. Adrian Herbst memorandum of October 4, 1982, Reserve Fund. Baird made a motion that a provision in the RFP require that the successful bidder allocate a line of credit available for purposes of upgrading the system. Seconded by Tatone. After some discussion, a motion was made by Henderson that action of Baird's motion be tabled until further information be given. Seconded by Hanson. Motion carried unanimously. John Gibbs stopped the open issue discussion at Herbst memorandum of October 4, 1982 Amount and Use of Franchise Fees. Lanegran made a motion to adjourn at 10:10 p.m., seconded by Walker. Motion carried unanimously. VII. Other Business. John Gibbs discussed the MCCB memorandum of October 1, 1982. Hanson made a motion to draft a letter of approval to MCCB, seconded by Henderson. Motion carried unanimously. The provisions approved are:• D. Compensation for access. In exchange for obtaining access to a property owner's premises, a cable communications company shall, within 30 days after installation of a cable communications system, 1. Compensate the property owner for any reduction in the value of the premises resulting directly from the installation of the cable communications; 2. Reimburse the property owner,�in an amount not to exceed one hundred dollars for premises containing less than ten dwelling units and two hundred dollars for all other premises, for actual costs incurred by the proper.ty, owner with respect to the�professional review of plans and drawings regarding the proposed cable communications system, contractual materials and other documentations; 3. Pay to the property owner a one-time charge not exceeding one dollar for each dwelling unit on the property owner's premises. _ . � � -5- VII. Other Business continued. Baird made a motion that the Commission does not subscribe to the Communications Newsletter published by Mason Publishing. Seconded by Walker. Motion carried unanimously. � Henderson made a motion that the Commission consider evaluating and studying whether or not a reasonal5le lobbyist policy would be in the best int rest of the Commission acta:vities. Lanegran moved to table the motion by Henderson. Seconded by Baird. Aye: Zemke, Lanegran, Baird, Witt, Tatone, Walker, Hanson, Boelter Nay: Henderson Henderson moved that the meeting be adjourned. Seconded by Walker. Motion carried unani.mously. The meeting adjourned.at 10:12 p.m. Prepared by: Jane Salen staff secretary NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION , c/o City Offices —T MendotahHeight DMinnesota 55120 XI. NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FULL COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 20, 1982 7:30 P.M. � t AGENDA Roll Call. � Agenda and Amendments thereto approved be a majority of those present and voting. , Approval of the Minutes of the October 6, 1982 meeting. ' Recital regarding communications to the Board. Executive Committee Report. Ownership Committee Report. Continue discussion of open issues. Other:Business. Report of'Officers. . ' Presentations by interested members of the public at the meeting wishing to be heard on matters not included on the�Agenda. Adjournment. � � 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA f } ( �_ �{ EIVED � �SEp 7 1��'7 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF MAPLE PARK COURT IMPROVEMENTS AND NOTICE I OF HEARING TO DETERMINE AND CONSIDER PRO.POSE.D ASSESSMENTS FOR SUCH IMPROVEMENTS j TO WHOM ITiMAY CONCERN: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, County, Minnesota, deems it necessary and desirable to cor construction of the improvements nereinafter described an� �^ � ^ -a - :- g c o,., � ,- � � c ; ; � S r _ �se.. �., e..�..,,.....s o� :.ai� ir;proveM . NOW THEREFORE, notice is hereby given that the City Counci the City of Mendota Heights will hold a public hearing on improvements and the proposed assessments therefor at the lowing time and place and within the said City: Date and Time: Tuesday, October 19, 1982 8:00 o'clock p.m. . Location: Mendota Heights City Hall 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota The general nature of the improvements is: ; The construction of a storm sewer system including � tenances and incidentals thereto and the acquisitior • easements, to.serve the area hereinafter more parti- cularly described. � )akota �ider the �f aid ol- 55120 pur- of The construction of street improvements consisting f the acauisition of easements ar.d the arading, stabiliza ion, drainage and bituminous surfacing, and the construc ion of concrete curbs and gutters on Maple Park Court w ich is located in ivy Falls First Addition in Mendcta H ights, Minnesota. The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements _s situated within the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minn�sota, and is more particularly described as follows: Lots Four (4) through Eight (8), in Block Six (6) i Ivy Falls First Addition. , The total estimated cost of each of said follows: Storm Sewer $20,420.00 Street Improvements 21,813.00 improvements is s � , � It is proposed to assess every lot, piece or �arcel of land benefited by said improvements whether abutt�ing thereon or not based upon benefits received without regard to cash valuation in accordance with the proposed assessment roll thereof which is now on file with the City Clerk of the City of Mendota Heights at the City Hall of said City and which asse�ssment roll is open to public inspection. Persons desiring to be heard with reference to the proposed improvements and/or the proposed assessments therefor should be present at the hearing. The proposed assessment roll for said improvements is on file for public inspection in the office of the City Clerk. Written or oral objections to said assessments will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned :r:eet'_zg �ai �n s:�c" f�rthe� notic� tc the :zffactea �,�OpCL cy �wr�er.� - as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within 10 days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any individual assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. You are hereby advised of the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193, 435.194 and 435.195 which provide for the possibility of a deferral of special assessments in the case of hardship for senior citizens. This Council proposes to proceed under and pursuant to the authority granted to it under the Minnesota Statutes, Section 429. . Dated this 17th day of August, 1982. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Kathleen M. Swanson City of Mendota Heights a CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO T0: City Council FROM: Edward F. Kishel City Engineer October 14, 1 SUBJECT: Maple Park Court Feasibility/Assessment Hearing - October 19, 1982 Job No. 7911 Improvement 79 Project 12 In the matter of the above subject hear,ing, the following comn recominendations are relevent. ( The hearing is being held to determine the feasibility of insi storm sewers and do street reconstruction, including concrete curb gutter, on Maple Park Court to relieve a surface water problem affE Lot 7, Block 6 of Ivy Falls Addition. s and lling nd ting A request for relief by the Owner of Lot 7 prompted the establ�shment of this hearing, by the Council ' Since October 1979 several feasibility reports have been prepa ed with regard to surface water removal and street reconstruction in ivy Fa ls Add- ition. There have been informal meetings with residents. Because f a divergence of opi:nion, nothing has happened to this time. � The most recent feasibility report is dated August 12, 1982 an recom- mends that streets in the entire Ivy Falls Addition�be upgraded and that storm sewers be installed, as was recommended in the previous repor s. As an alternate, the report suggests that, as a minimum, only Maple Pa k Court be upgraded. , The August 12th report shows estimated cost figures of $20,400�00 for installing storm sewers and $21,813.00 for constructing streets. Tlese were the numbers that were published in the Hearing Notice. , In preparing the assessment roll, we more closely evaluated th anti- cipated costs and determined that the work could not be completed b fore 1983 and that with interest rates falling, construction will pick u and bidding prices are likely to increase. Therefore it is necessary t increase our estimates to $22,422.00 for storm sewers and $23,994.00 for str et construction. We also took into consideration the time honored method of ass ssing. Storm Sewers by the amount of area contributing to surface run-off, and Street Construction by adjusted front feet. In computing anticipat d as- sessments, we found that the above methods did not appear to be equitable and chose to consider that all five parcels involved benefited equally by the proposed construction. Feasibility Report Maple Park Court Page Two We therefore recommend that each parcel be assessed $4,484.40 for storm sewers and $4,798.80 for streets for a total of $9,283.20 per lot. This is a maximum, and if construction costs are less than $46,416.00 the assessment roll will be revised to reflect the actual total cost. It is also being recommended that if the above assessments are established, that there be no future assessments made against these properties for storm sewers and streets, should other portions of Ivy Falls Addition be upgraded. Sto�rm sewer assessments may be paid off over a 19 year period while street construction can be paid off in 10 years at an interest rate, on the unpaid balance, of one percent above the rate paid for financing by the City. Because this is a feasibility/Assessment hearing, the Council will not only hear testimony regarding feasibility, and act on it, but will also be required to adopt the attached assessment roll, or some modification thereof, if a project is ordered. PARCEL N0. 37600- 041-06 37600- 050-06 37600- 060-06 37600- 070-06 37600- (PROPOSED) ASSESSMENT ROLL STORM SEWERS AND STREET CONSTRUCTION IVY._FALLS FIRST ADDITION - MAPLE PARK COURT IMPROVEMENT 79 PROJECT 12 JOB NO. 7911 ADOPTED REPUTED OWNER & DESCRIPTION Richard C. Herzog 703 Maple Park Court Mendota Heights, MN 55118 William Parks Walker 711 Maple Park Court Mendota Heights, N�i 55118 Lloyd F. Jr. & Martha M. Smith 716 Maple Park Court Mendota Heights, M[�11 55118 Ellis & Edythe Abrahamson 714 Maple Park Court Mendota Heights, NII�i- 55118 - JoAnn Fesler Menning _ �06 Ma�e Pa*"k-CQt�rt Mendota Heights, NIl�t 55118 SUBDIVISION LOT BLK. NO. NO. Ivy Falls lst Add. 4 6 STREETS $4,798.80 Ivy Falls lst Add. � 5 � 6 � $4,798.80 Ivy Falls lst Add. � 6 � 6 �° $4,798.80 Ivy Falls lst Add. 7 6 Ivy Falls lst Add. 8 6 $4,798.80 $4,798.80 STORM SEWE RS $4,484.40 $4,484.40 $4,484.40 $4,484.40 $4,484.40 TOTAL $9,283.20 : $9,283.20 � $9,283.20 � $9,283.20 � $9,283.20 � � ' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS i � MEMO i , October 14, 1982 I ! T0: City Council ; i ! FROM: Edward F. Kishel Ci ty E�ngi neer SUBJECT: Map�le Park Court Sto�rm Sewers and Streets � Job,� No. 7911 Improvement 79 Project 12 The attached document wasbrought to my attention early this mo ning. ( The information is basically correct except that the matter of creek improvements, included in the total cost, should not be tied in wit the Ivy Falls Addition improvements. � The hearing concerns proposed improvements on Maple Park Court It is possible that discussion sould be limited to property owners aff cted by the proposed project because of an additional hearing coming up t 8:45 P.M. T0: AL'L IVY FALLS FIKST Al?UITIO,i tIO� i� UWtd�:P.S SUi3J,�CT: Proposed street, sewer, and creelc improvements to �ta�Ze Par� Caurt PRC3BLE.'�f: You are wel.l aware that ,your streets have not tieen resurfac �d or g�,ven adeZuate maintenance s�.nce tliey �rere installed some tw�rtty years a o. �urther- mare� the city is apparently unwi.11.in� to: adequately�maintain our treets un- 2ess the suLdivisian a�rees to £our tlYtti�s; � 1. hip�sing out exlstin� 5`2" street and renl.acing i,C with a new 8" stree�. 2, Installin� cancreCe curi,s and gutCezs. 3. Installing sCorm se�,�ers in the new streat. 4. �iaking creek repa�.rs due to stor�a sewer water Flowing into creek. COST: 7:he city of Iiendota FieigllL•s has conc2ucted five studies sinee 19 7 in an attemgt to solve the abave problem. From the "stwlies," .the�estim ted cast - (in i977 dollars) to make t�ie above im�rovemenCs isa � 1. StreeCs, curbs, and �utters 2. Starm secoers 3, Creek improvements Tatal est. cast $2b1�000.00 232,700.QQ 65Q,OOO.QO '.��43, 700.00 'lhus, the esti�mrated cast rer lot owner is between $15,44Q.QO and $ O,OOO.OQ� depending upan Che assess,ment fozmula used by the ciCy. i . � ;3ACKGROUND; During 1980 the ciCy pro�osed making the above mentionad i provec�ents in xvy Falls Fizst !lciciition. L7ue to strong opposiCion from reside ta, tiie prapasal was dropped by the council in early 19$1. �he ma�or, reaso s For o�+posin� �he city's glan taere: � , � I. I2esiclents rrefcrred tt�e rustic, "counCry-like" atmosph re of Ivy Falls wittiout curbs and �utters, ' . 2. Cost caas proliibitive. •, 3. C�rryin� off surface storm waCer in a storm sewer syst dumg- ing directly into tae creek taould �ubject lot owners t additionai " assessments for creek ancl sewer maintenance that ttiey re not •1 naw 2egally requirecl Ca pay.; -• � " ; ' Recantly the city has ag.ain pushed to impZemeut its plan for Ivy Fa I.s. . Tliis time the city prapases ta tiegin wi.th i�€a�Ie Park Court. I3efore tlie ciCy can sCart they must have a public hearin�; sclaeduled for Uctober 19 1952. 4 i:i,COi�kiE�1tI)A'�'Ifl�': Fi�iit back a�ain. .'�ttend t;ie pu'�lic i�,earing Tuesday, UcCoUer' I9, I982 at 7:3p p.m. at Ciey llall. It is important tlxat a 1 lot . , owners in ivy �"a11s First Add�.tion attend tn1.s hearing. In additio , p3ease sig;n tlie attached petitian and deliver to one af the Acl Hoc ommittee members befare Oc�oUer T9, 19i32. It is nat anly :iaple Yark Gourt's figi�t. Figiit for decerit streets at reasonable cost� r�it:iout cctri�s and guCt �rs. Le� tl�e city know it is zrresponsib2e �overnment to force non-essenClial capital improvements on its citizens. ' � , , FRQ;i: Tl1e Acl 23oc Comm3.ttee Charles Bans Gai3. I'areman llick Herzog ].100 Sylvat�d�le itc! . h88 ?doadrici�;e 7U3 �[aple Par�. Court 457-63 2 45�-64 S 457-83 8 I am in �avor of resurfacin� tiie existin� streets in ivy �'alls First Additian. I am ��;�inst the rrapose� plan to consCruct r�ew streets, curbs, �utters, storm sewers, and creek im�ravemenCs. . , . ; � � _ > � Sz�uature Address Date Si�naCure * � . 0 � S H a Mandrake �lirplanes, Inc. Sixteen October Eighty Two OC� 1 � iS�2 Off�ce of The Honorable Mayor City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 Subject: Assessment Maple Park Court Job 7911 Improvement # 79 Project 12 i Dear Mr. Mayor: j 1 I am opposed to the above subject proposed project. � The proposed improvement is aesthe.tically nil and•practically economical and alternate solutions sh.ould be considered? i Cordially , sincerel , � .-- • /' � �1�� ,��C'�7 Wm. Parks Walke.r 711 Maple Park Court Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 _ i 612.457.4400 a 1 WPW/mb � Administration Building Saint Paul Downtown Airport (Holman Field) Saint Paul, Minnesota 55107 . U,S.A. 612 . 221 . 1000 OFFICERS 1981•82 DONALD C. BERGOUIST President and Assistant Reglstrar 62 Weston Road Weston, Conn. 06883 ROLAND J. WOLCOTT President Emeritus 3682 Woodridge Road Cleveland, Ohio 44121 MAOELYN WOLCOTT COlCA1RE Vice President Emerltus 13677 N. Garden Court Drive Sun City, Arizona 85351 BETTY WOLCOTT GEORGE First Vice President 2115 Ceniral Avenuo Victaria. B.C., Canada VBS 2R4 WM. G. WOLCOTT Second Vlce President 428 Earl Ave. Kent, Ohio 44240 W.BRAYTON BATSON Third Vice President 1107 Center Avenue Pittsburgh, Pa. 15229 BRUCE WOLCOn LIND�UIST Publiclty 417 Cedarcrott Avenue Audubon, N.J. 08106 ROBERT C. Gf;IFFEN Aegistrar �35 Oatka Road rry, New York 14530 ,,.,ANN WOLCOTT MENNING Secretary 706 Maple Park Court SI. Paul Min. 55118 TEDDI ANN GRIGGS Assistant Secretary 3783 75th St. East Inver Grove Heights, Min.55075 JEAN PETERS PROFFIT Treasurer 7420 Bosworth Place Columbus, Ohio 43229 SARAH UFFORD DAVIS Assistant Treasurer Route 1, Box 82 Blackstone, Va. 23824 CLARISSA M. WOLCOTT Historian 922 Locust Street Columbla, Pa. 17512 DAVID PIERCE MASON, JR. Poet 2359 Old Trail Drive Reston, Va. 22091 JOHN FRANKLIN WOLCOTT President and Chairman of THE HENRY WOLCOTT FOUNDATION 448 Trlangle Avenue Dayton, Ohio 45419 ROGER A. WOLCOTT Chairman, Connecticut "350" 67 Ridge Ave. Agawam, Mass. 01001 r'{VEi� � C 1� 1 5 1s3� ?�he �4QciP#g uf ��es�Ert�rttrr#s nf �Ext� �n�Ca## 12 October 1982 City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights� �vuv 551zo To Whom it may concern: This letter is in response to your notic of August 17� 1982 regarding the public hear- ing on October 19, 1982 for improvementsjand proposed assessments on Maple Park Court; Mendota Heights� MN. � � f We, the undersigaed, strongly object to the cost of the project as well as the over- all project. Also, there has been little or no effort i by the City of Mendota Heights to maintain I the streets in�said area. We feel, as tax- 1 payers, that the streets in the Ivy Falls I First Addition should be maintained by the city at no extra cost to the residents. �' Ra1pK A(�/ Mennin� C' j � � J .Ann Menning 1982 REUNION 706 Maple Park Court DENVER,COLORADO ►5�,. Paul� Nnv 551i8 August 6, 7, 8 8 man: Elvina A. Sloddard .�44 Sluarl Street Denver, Colorado 80212 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING GENERAL HOUSING PLAN ( � � NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mendota Heights City Council{will in the City Hall Council Chambers, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota�Heig Minnesota, on Tuesday, October 19, 1982, at 8:45 o'clock P.M. to condu a public hearing pursuant to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, S 462C.01, et seq., as it relates to adoption of a General Housing Plan. plan will describe the housing needs of the City and will describe a p meet said needs and other matters required by Minnesota Statutes,',Chap 462C. � Persons desiring to be heard on the proposed plan may address the Further information regarding the plan will be available at the office City Administrator after October 11, 198�. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk eet s, tion This n to ncil. the MENDOTA HEIGHTS 462(C) HOUSING PLAN October 19, 1982 A. HOUSING INUENTORY AND ANALYSIS 1. Number and Type of Housinq Units It is estimated that there were 2,292 housing units in the City of Mendota Heights in 1980. Of these, 2,176 or 94.9 percent are single f amily units and 113 units or 5.1 percent are multiple f amily units. In addition, there were two mobile homes. In comparison, there were 1,556 housing units in 1970 of which 1,513 or 97.2 percent were single f amily units, 41 or 2.6 percent were multiple family units, and two or 0.1 percent were mobile homes. During the period from 1970 to 1980, single family units have increased by 43.8 percent, multiple family units have increased by 175.6 percent, and mobile homes have remained the same for an overall increase in housing un�its of 47.3 percent. Although the overall percentage of single f amily detached uni_ts has decreased slightly since 1970, single family homes are still the predominant housing type and the decrease is relatively insignificant. Seven hundred thirty-six (736) units or 32.1 percent of 1970. This represents an average annual change of 4.7 percent f or the period f rom 1960 to 1970. 2. Residential Land Availability the housing stock has been built since percent for this period compared to 1.8 There are approximately 1,900 acres of vacant land in the City as shown in Table 1. It is esti- mated that 800+ acres of vacant land would ultimately be used f or residential purposes. This 800 acres represents 12.8 percent of the total land in the City and 33.8 percent of all residential land. - Thus, Mendota Heights is approximately two-thirds developed in terms of total residential land uses. 3. Tenure The 1980 Census shows the City of Mendota Heights as having 2,292 housing units. Of these, 2,141 _ housing_units_or_ 93.4_percent_were_owner-occupied. -1- � TABLE 1 EXISTING LAND USE IN ACRES 1977 , TOTAL PERCENT LAND OF LAND LAND USE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 USE USE >ingle Family 154.4 221.1 43.6 111.5 165.6 243.1 249.0 192.3 244.1 1,624.7 26� "wo F ami 1 y 0 0 0 0. 7 0 0 0 0 0 0. 7 ' 09' lulti-Family 9.0 4.9 0 0 11.7 0 � 0 0 0 25.6 1% :ommercial 0 0 0 0 46.7 7.5 22.7 10.2 21.7 108.8 2% 'ublic/Semi-Public 0 0 140.5 19.5 55.9 0 407.1 122.1 2.5 731.6 12% ndustrial 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.1 0 0 30.1 09� 'ark 9.0 9.9 0 7.2 89.9 0 611.2 8.0 50.2 785.4 13% >chool 0 9.2 0 14.6 0' 89.8 0 90.7 0 204.3 3% �treet 39.3 48.3� 24.8 73.0 106.7 43.6 204.4 141.6 88.4 770.1 129' 'ailroad 0 0 0 10.9 0 0 50.8 0 0 61.7 19' `acant 12.9 64.7 5.4 207.3 100.4 61.8 438.8 320.1 691.8 1,903.2 30� �OTAL AREA 224.6 358.1 214.3 444.7 576.9 445.8 2,014.1 885.0 1,098.7 6,262.2 100� -�eveloped Area 211.7 293.4 208.9 237.4 - 476.5 384.0 1;575.3 564.9 406.9 - 4,359.0 70q -_ 'ercent of ��,=�y ��,,,;��Q�� -�� °�-�3� �3�-Q�,� 7�� 649' �7y 709' -2- 69 housing units or 3.0 percent were renter occupied, and 81 housing units or 3.5 percent were vacan�. In 1970, there were 1,556 units of which 1,513 or 97.2 percent were single f amily detached homes and 41 or 2.6 percent were multiple f amily units. Metropolitan Council data for the f ourt� quarter of 1981 shows Mendota Neights ta have an overall vacancy rate of 0.� percent compared to 1.9 percent in the Metropalitan Area. Turn-aver rates were 1.7 percent in Mendota Neights compared to 6.7 percent f or the Metrapo1itan Area. Thus, Mendota Heights has a stable population and an extremely low vacancy rate. During the f ourth quarter of 1981, Mendota Heights had a total of nine vacant un�its or 0.4 per- cent of all units. All of these units were single f amily. The City had six units which had been vacant six manths or longer, For this period, there was a t�rn-over of �0 uniis ar a rate of 1.7 percent. Of these, 39 units (1.8 percent) were single f amily turn-overs and one unit (1.1 percent} were multiple f amily turn-overs. � 4. Cost af Housi nq The cost af housing in the City af Mendota Heights is higher than Dakota Gaunty or the urban area of Dakata Co�nty. The median value o-F hausing in Mendota Heigftts in ].970 was $29,600. According to the 1980 Census, the median housing value increased by 196 percent in Mendota Heights to $87,700. Table 2 shows �he relationship af the cost af housing in Mendaia Neights to other eom- munities in Dakota Gounty. The increase in housing costs since 1970 has been greater than the cnajority of the County. , The figures in Table 2 refilec� market assessed value and nat actual market values. Therefore, the actual price af hames in the various cammunities are higher than shown in Tab1e 2. However, the relationship between the present cast of housing and the increase,in cost since 1970 in the previous cor�uniiies is valid and shows the trend. The cost of rental uniis has been similariy af#'ected by inflatian since 1970, Tab1e 3 shows the f air market rents f ar Dakota County as of April 1981. -3- COMMUNITY Apple Valley Burnsville Eagan Farmington Hastings Inver Grove Heights Lakevi lle Lilydale Mendota Mendota Heights Rosemount South Saint Pau 1 Sunfish Lake West Saint Pau 1 URBAN AREA AVERAGE DAKOTA COUNTY AVERAGE TABLE 2 URBAN HOUSING AVERAGE VALUE 1970 - 1980 DAKOTA COUNTY AVERAGE 1970 VALUE $ 29,000 • 33, 500 26,666 18,900 19,500 22,000 24,400 Not Available 24,300 29,600 21,800 1:9 ;200 49,186* 21,500 $ 26,119 $ 22,784 * Metropolitan Council Figure AUERAGE 1980 VALUE $ 72,300 79 , 500 70,900 60,600 - 59,900 65,500 68,600 162,500 46,200 87,700 63,900 56 ,100 159, 400 62,100 Not Available $ 68,100 PERCENT CHANGE 149.3% 137.3q 165.9% 220.6q 207.2% 197.7% 181.19� N/A 90.1% 196.3% 193.19' 192.2% 224.1q 188.8% N/A 198 . 9q Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census: "1970 General Housing Characteristics", and Minnesota Analysis and Planning System 1980 Census -4- � TABLE 3 FAIR MARKET RENTS - DAKOTA COUNTY APRIL 1981 DWELLING UNIT SIZE FAIR MARKET RENT Studio Apartment One Bedroom Two Bedroom Three Bedroom Four Bedroom $262 $317 $372 $42 9 $483 Source: Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority ' It will be difficult to provide an adequate supply of housing for those persons in the low and moderate income ranges. One reason is that the City has limited influence over the type and cost of housing units constructed. High mortgage rates and the availability of mortgage loans, as well as the costs of land, labor, and materials, have a much greater impact on the cost of housing than any public actions. Table 4 gives a comparison of the components making up the selling price of a house between 1950 and 1977. 5. Housing Choice Households in the City of Mendota Heights are generally in the middle of high income ranges. 1970 Census data indicates that Mendota Heights has a relatively high f amily income of $20,147 per year or nearly 50 percent greater than the average family income for Dakota County (see Table 7). Table 6 indicates that in the year 1970, more than 50 percent of the families within Mendota Heights earned more than $15,000 per year. This information points to the fact that Mendota Heights has a relatively affluent population. -5- 0 TABLE 4 COMPONENTS OF TNE SELLING PRICE OF A HOUSE Materials Labar � Overhead, Marketing, Profit Land Financing 1950 1977. 36% 32% 34� 18� 14� 19� L1% 2ti/ 5W IO% Saurce: Metropolitan Council af the Twin Cities � I�rp �YI��IY11�1�1 COMMUNITY West Saint Paul Hastings South Saint Paul Farmington Burnsville Eagan Inver Grove Heights Mendota Heights � TABLE 5 COMPARISON OF ZONING REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM SINGLE FAMILY LOT (SQUARE FEET) 7,000 9,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 12,000 15,000 MAXIMUM MULTI-FAMILY DENSITY (UNITS/ACRE) 14.5 17.5 29.0 24.0 25.5 23.0 43.5 10.0 Source: Residential Zoning Ordinances, Metropolitan Council, 1977 . - 7 - 0 FAMILY INCOME $ 0 - 4,999 $ 5,000 - 9,999 $10,000 - 14,999 $15,000 - 24,999 $25,000 - 49,999 $50,000 and over MEDIAN INCOME MENDOTA HEIGHTS 3.4 15.8 26 .8 32 .4 16 .8 4.8 $15,000 TABLE 6 PERCENT OF FAMILIES BY INCOME DAKOTA COUNTY 7.9 23.5 38.2 24.5 5.1 0.8 $12,000 METROPOLITAN AREA 11.3 25.8 34:5 22.2 5.1 1.1 $10,000 STATE OF MINNESOTA 18 . 7 31.8 29.2 16.0 3.6 0.7 $9,000 Source: Minnesota Analysis and Planning System, Fourth Count of the 1970 Census, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, 1972 : TABLE 7 1970 AVERAGE FAMILY INCOME Mendota Heights $ 20,147 Dakota County $ 13,424 Metropolitan Area $ 13,097 State of Minnesota $ 11,079 Source: Minnesota Analysis and Planning System, Fourth Count, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota 1972 As of 1970, 6.6 percent of Mendota Heights' housing stock was in the price range of aff ordable to low and moderate income persons. This included all units renting for under $150 per month and homes valued at under $15,000 in 1970 dollars. The 1970 and 1980 Census gave the breakdown of the value of housing units as shown in Table 8. As of 1970, Mendota Heights had 29.8 percent of its single family units and seven percent of its rental units in the modest cost range. Modest cost housing is roughly defined in 1975 dollars as housing costs between $20,000 and $40,000, and apartments renting for $260 to $440 per month. With the present rates of inflation and f ast rising housing costs, the demand will continue to increase for the limited supply of modest cost housing. Theref ore, it is important for the City to carefully evaluate proposals for additional housing units to ensure efficient use of land and resoures. In order to get a better idea of the number of lower income households needing Metropolitan Council has prepared an estimate of the housing assistance needs f in the Metropolitan Area. The data for Mendota Heights is presented in Table 9 currently has three Section 8 existing units of subsidized housing and one unit Moderate Rehabilitation. These units are provided through the participation of in the Dakota County Housing and-Redevelopment Authority. —In addition,-there i assisted housing which is being provided through Dakota Adults a group home for physically retarded adults. �'� assistance, the or each community . The City of Section 8 Mendota Heights s twelve units of the mentally and TABLE 8 ESTIMATED HOUSING VALUE 0 Distribution of Owner Occupied Units by Value of Units 1970 CENSUS (OWNER OCCUPIED UNITS: 1,427) PERCENT 1980 CENSUS (OWNER OCCUPIED UNITS: 2,141) PERCENT Less than $10,000 0.6% ' Less than $25,000 .3% $10,000 - $14,999 4.8% $25,000 - $39,999 2.4% $15,000 - $19,999 11.4q $40,000 - $49,999 4.7q $20,000 - $24,999 18.4� $50,000 - $79,999 35.1q $25,000 - $34,999 32.29' $80,000 - $99,999 19.6% $35,000 and Over 32.6% $100,000 and Over 37.9q Distribution of Renter Occupied Units by Monthly Rent 1970 CENSUS PERCENT Less than $100 19% $100 - $149 239� $150 - $199 7q $200 and Over 51� o�r 1970 Census and 1980 Census 1980 CENSUS (Renter Occupied Unit: 69) PERCENT Less than $150 14% $150 - $249 389� $250 - $399 26� $400 and Over 22q - 10 - � �� TABLE 9 ESTIMATED HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS August 1979 Estimated Total Need Estimated Need of Lower Income Renter Households Estimated Need of Lower Income Owner Households TOTAL 33 16 17 ELDERLY 22 9 13 * Does not include 28 households comprised of single individuals Source: Metropolitan Council, August 1979 FAMILY 9* C 3 LARGE FAMILY 2 1 1 6. Housinq Conditions For the purpose of analysis of housing conditions, the City of Mendota Heights has been divided into nine diff erent neighborhoods as shown in Figure 8. These neighborhoods were determined in part from the neighborhoods of the 1959 Comprehensive Plan and in part by the available data from the United States Census Bureau. During the summer of 1977, a windshield survey was taken of all existing single family houses in the City. The objective of the survey was to view the exterior of all single f amily units and make a determination as to the status of the physical condition of each single f amily residence. The following criteria were used: Excellent. These are relatively new buildings, usually erected within the past ten years which appear to be satisf actory f or continued lif e of 20 years or more with only normal maintenance. Good. These are buildings which, with minor remodeling or rehabilitation, would be satis- f actory f or useful lif e of an additional 20 years. Frequently, these buildings were erected between the years 1940 and 1960. Fair. These are buildings, that if they were to provide a useful service for an additional 20 years, would require major remodeling or, after casual study, would �indicate that demoli- tion should take place within the next 20 years. Poor. These are buildings that are definitely classified as substandard and could not be economically remodeled and probably should be demolished. Housing in Mendota Heights is generally in good to excellent condition. According to the 1977 survey of housing conditions, 881 units or 46.6 percent were in excellent condition; 977 units or 52.7 percent were in good condition; eight units or 0.4 percent were in f air condition; and five units or 0.3 percent were in poor condition. Table 10 shows the results of the survey by neigh- borhood. Two commonly used indicators of substandard housing units are overcrowding and lack of some or all plumbing f acilities._ According to the 1980 Census, 1.0 percent of the housing units in Mendota Heights were overcrowded, compared with 1.9 percent in the Metropolitan Area. Overcrowded housing is defined as units having more than 1.01 persons per room. - 12 - .' yf}� �� 9 � �� ' �� . ., f�lyr•i'•+5....___..._...� ..1 .....� , ��%�'�� A;��M�-�`�`� � . �'� • �' ��•;M+ ' DAY0T4 CO:1N7Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. �71NMESOT�M1 � �.�` •S \ i . ''�_. i .• 1 � . Figure 8 % . , � �� A �i ' ' � Plant�it�g IVeighbot'hood5 � = � ; : - � . ��. somerset , ,f ; ; view , � � �� ; � ��,�, .,��_. ,:�. �� \.\� '; �. ^.0 _ _ _, •' �_ % , .�, ' � . ! i ., ' �,` ' .5:�' "�'� •'t.1 � ,\+,_�, ;-_- � Z.. . • � .! , � Clierrj�:- - . . . -;' ��: Hiils:�f--� ;� y ' , ;;�:. � � _ , =��:, ...�, _- =;'r� �+ .. 3 °'� y J�mE� ,� ,1 P �r-.- -- ,. � , '; �� '' .� �; '�' •i - �{:• - �.�Ub - � -- - '.� ��f''.,,, �" =-`�it-- �•-, ' • ' . ii. �� i r� �:•"t,�. � l ~ %,�;' � � `:. =~i � - ` ! s -- - is i t � -�%' "" � � - ' � ::-��'`� ` � ,� �� : _._ ,`�`'„ ; �_ � �- - - _--- -- _ ; .. �. �..l,��.,,... ' .i' .�..r ==' .� �.�. �:,�, -�; --:.�-�:;�;j',a.� � �:� ��;3�;;� . _ - — �-�._. �',: y .�^.='` . g� .� ;�;;s �_:��-' ::A,. �_ � � �..• , ' • � , _ _ — .- `":-.� -� �� .� _ • � � . �:::._.. �� i. � � Y �.,:--�"''� :� ' .� �`,�.;�;a: � �.`�.;:;�~"'. Somerset-�:� � � Willow. . �/.:�'1 f ,� �, � �u,v;at.-i��.t_},r » 'F � 7!_J.. -� _,,,, � : .p. �._ �....:...,_.... �� ; • �., ;. --__ "f.�, ,.�=,.: f._-�;� �- -_.:-_ �� --= ;; �lilis;��.:�. : .S� rin ,. ,. � � � � 1'%,: :"a;'�.: ;' ..�:.�i-; r� v wa . p g -- �•� ,;�� ;,,:' _ �_ "l.•% _ ` ' ._ ` � ;, � r:.,�. , � y '� .. . _. ., � ._...__. ,...�_ , ..s' �.. ., � i-r:-..�.,�.._, ....�=_ � H�gl��a�d '� � ..;' i a.�rl -,..."�' - . " . i rr' ..`, .. _!. , '� ,,.�"-.y _ '��•♦-' n +. .. , y+•�r�/, '`{ _H :� � ' s�+_�J' ' .-� , � '" ` , ' � 1!� � _ __ .�'j'' .y,:..�.: "i�. � � �j�'F � N 1: f1 ' ' r,%� . 'tn ' , ', ; i'' '� ��•� �: t"��I�iit$ � - , ! � ��,�' � 7. ,� ,...i p ` ii _ r i { � � `� �,�:� .. �,. ,- ,� .,.: �:.�.:,�{�' . ��i7;�i-� �� 4 ; �.Y`• %: 'r'�., � � � ��.; ^ i i _ �.� 4p•. e %; i . �^'" � • _� ; � " .{ '__ ' , .- ; .. r .. � . t ' r _ I'.` 3 �_� ; �4;,, ;;;.,. �,, _ ��.,, �_. , -1�=-g . , :: �v�.,`, ��.. _ . :: ,n.�� , , Y ,` � `' ` + . , �. , .,� ,,a.. • r ::'._<,; • �,�., ; ,. r._�,�� - � .L � � ., . ,... � ,�,�,,[ . . . ' � � �;: f',�;. � { �,'' T:r . .�..�.. �. �c:�;,;�M' . � � /��I• /: �� •.�� .• � " .F`�".vS' �°:�.�:�. . i u �:i' � 'a� ' I Ysa � f:. I '5.�� . •� �: � I t.i...,..-. ° - �'��'i � �,�` +v � ,� I • ( • �;:', ' � _ p •;�.j �' �i i t YI --- �.. L, „ i'�� ,nx . s ' •,� ;r! L �F' :� �t�" � a , ' �'" . ' _ :y k.�.� 1=j. ,.%�' `��t_r` `i ? 3r .. - • 1 �', •' ': y r � , . + ... C. :� ♦ ` ., i,' � ,1 y? , , - . !� r � ?.�� ( ;� �. t,. .. �. r ' �,,. ',�,'`�>'r :�:,'.�., •', r ` . -� r' "ll.�:.�s " '�v •..r • � . � �r . .. �- , s. _ . , � .� j a a�. _ .-.. _. . 'I j i K,; . . i •l ^T-:�:.�.- .l �i:.�.._-r_ _-�r� -�� ir:....c �t . L. i 1? � � I.. ��_, _y' •__ ~'i.. '. � f.' t•�,('--- `;•'��` . - ��,.---"' � �T •-'.._ .. � :�.. .. � r •".�.,, i i, ia }n�,.:,..,s-.,.:i^�',."� � .�;'�'~� i .,...... ,'- „ ' S.: ; �*• j ; , ; . I 'fit • { °A—�e._...=.'/ \ ( B ^,, ! , / i �:.. �::• - � �;? ...z:._. � ��,,,�,_ .. i5 � Z.�*7 '1 I� `1'�. � � '' "_�� .3� T•,,'. i vl '?�'' -^'.;..-.! 1�. . .i � � . . i � ;} : . : � �, ."' � r ;• � � • . ' `�e I �j�'_ _.� •'�?• L� II r�i.,,, �'�O` '�� .2. �I lO� i ` �t ��, :�Wagan '�-i`°��;�: . �. ,�riendiy . -,, i t i � ` � �. ,' ' Y. ,� � � h � S ��, .l _ t f � ,�� 'Y . S � � j�•,�' ��IIS ' ' . ` "' G r 1. ; : , . �a� . •. " �' '1 . t "�.: ��l'; � • . C�t • . T . . �� }. '. . �� -�- -- - , , f, ;� .c,�:` .� �,� - �r - -. ! rai� , i �, �'�'', ' .., ,. . �^ � i� _ � , �: 1�P,- i•' Ai,''_ j� _ f ,� i •i . \ .F� . hj �' :' . � Y :i .� : � i .l � f - , ,��\ . ' _ ��i. :� "' N i. i: i• + � . �' C . . �1 7�..; : "•'•' . . r .:.I . ��. _ . ' I ,� . ' 'iij.�i,. 1, , � � ;; ;• / ` , ��al�: j � . i !. , ' • :, `�� ' - , . . •' °? r. St I . � ..�, S .,. ' � _ i`�r.__.:.' _ . . . � �., : � `. - i _ . Y, .. ; �. , yr. , ' e ��?'7�.�.a � ■ � 1. ` � � : ; `� t�. �i� � ' ��.` s� {c_-.,.�.._ �.x�a:r-n.a.,.F,�� •,•�� K -' . . _ :1 i �+ ! i 1. ,+,- ` ,• I. �;�'J , 'j I'. �4�,� I nacw"'t�,/, . �� . .... liri',r�� ;(-�,; {'x;'7s=i+-+.-�.-`._... �„ . . . . : ' , . � n".;.,.z.-•.. -��„,; , . .a.r -� . __ _ ,. 'x, �'+�, w. �'IRty+''•'�.�`�`r... 7" �'.7 � �;.atSM1:,:;u'�:'..-��. ..��..:,, r-..y:,.:.:: _��:�'�' -�. . . - ' �� ' ... . • �A `- �' ` '} � ,,j � r � • . _-�.: -;�;:�ji' " -� 13� � ` , - : . . . /� 1 1 ._ � � ' J.• •L . . , , ` `='t NEIGHBORHOOD 1 Somerset View 2 Cherry Hills 3 Somerset Club 4 Highland Heights 5 Somerset Hills 6 Willow Spring 7 Pilot Knob 8 Wagon Wheel Trail 9 Friendly Hills TOTAL PERCENT TABLE 10 SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING CONDITION SURVEY 1977 EXCELLENT 107 211 30 167 121 102 5 116 22 881 (46.6%) GOOD 233 91 81 102 49 59 51 76 255 997 (52.7q) Source: City of Mendota Heights, Land Use Survey 1977 - 14 - � FAIR 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 1 8 (.4�) POOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 (.3�) TOTAL 340 302 111 271 170 161 66 192 278 1,891 (100/) One reason f or the low percentage of sub-standard units is that the majority of the housing stock is relatively new. Seven hundred thirty-six (736) or 32.1 percent of the 2,292 total housing units in the City have been built since 1970. However, as the housing stock ages, signs of deterioration will continue to show. The housing stock in the City of Mendota Heights is now generally at the age where most emphasis needs to be placed on housing maintenance to prevent deterioration. 7. Relationship to Adjacent Communities and the Metropolitan Area In comparison with the Metropolitan and immediately surrounding areas, Mendota Heights is unique in terms of the housing situation. The housing stock in Mendota Heights is predominantly relati- vely high value, single family detached. The City has an extremely low percentage of apartment units. Mendota Heights is a residential community with smaller percentages of commercial and industrial uses than the surrounding communities. The Metropolitan Council has included the City of Mendota Heights within the Area of Planned Urbanization in the Development Framework for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. The Area of Planned Urbanization is part of the Urban Service Area and comprises the developing surburban communities. Thus, Mendota Heights is included in the part of the region which is in the path of urban growth. B. FUTURE HOUSING 1. Housing Unit Projections It is anticipated that the City of Mendota Heights could accomodate approximately 1,428 addi- . ' tional housing units. This in addition to the 2,292 existing units would give a total of approximately 3,720 housing units in the City. These figures reflect total development of all residential land and would not necessarily occur by 1990. The calculations were based on the density shown in the Land Use Plan less a percentage f or roads and unbuildable land. Low density residential areas were calculated at a density of 2.3 units per gross acre, medium density aras at six units per gross acre, high density areas at ten units per gross acre, and rural residen — tial areas at 1.2 units per gross acre. Based upon the Land Use Plan, the additional units would be distributed among the permitted densities as follows: high density - 456 units; medium den- ; er�si��,�=7�3 �—an:v�rad r�r�-1 r�sid�ntial - 3�7 �mit-s - 15 - The Metropolitan Council has estimated that there will be approximately 3,700 households in Mendota Heights in the year 2000 as shown in Table 11 below. Theref ore, Mendota Heights has suf- ficient land available to accomodate projected growth to the year 2000. TABLE 11 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS METROPOLITAN COUNCIL POPULATION, HOUSEHOLD, AND EMPLOYMENT FORECASTS Population Households Employment Households Size (Persons Per Dwelling Unit) * 1973 Estimate 1970 6,565 1,553 1,254 4.2 Source: Metropolitan Council, February 1978 1976 7,391 2,038 1,500* 3.6 1980 7,800 2,200 2,500 3.5 1990 9,000 3,000 4,500 Cc�i� 2000 11,000 3,700 6,500 3.0 PERCENT INCREASE 1976-2000 67.2� 55.19' ?_3.1q Assuming the Metropolitan Council figures accurately reflect the rate of growth in Mendota Heights, the City should average the addition of 95 new units per year. The ultimate population - of-the-City-would-be-in-the-range-of-11,000 to 13,000-depending-on how f ast family size declines in the City (Mendota Heights has experienced a slower decline in f amily size in the past few years in comparison with the Metropolitan Area, which reflects the strong f amily orientation of the ort 1 - 16 - 0 after the year 2000. This date is dependent upon the projections of demand for housing which do not account f or economic conditions or further changes in the Land Use Plan resulting in dif- f ering densities. 2. Future_Housing Mix Mendota Heights has carefully planned for quality residential, commercial, and industrial deve- lopment over the years. The result has been the development of a community which is known throughout the Metropolitan Area as a quality environment. As shown previously, there is land available to accommodate an estimated 1,428 additional housing units. It is estimated that there will be a need for�approximately 900 of these additional units by 1990. However, the total number of housing units is only one dimension of housing need. A balanced price range and an assortment of types of housing are also desirable. The City has investigated various ways which might increase housing opportunities for various housing types and allow for a variety of housing prices. The actions a City can take in reducting housing costs are extremely limited. For example, the community f eels that lot size reductions would not reduce the cost of housing because of the demand f or lots in Mendota Heights. This is evidenced by a subdivision currently being built on lots of two-thirds the standard lot size which will sell f or essentially the same price as a standard lot. There are two basic sources of lower cost housing. These are lower priced, generally older pri- vate housing and housing which is subsidized by the government to reduce its cost to the con- sumer. With respect to the older private housing, it is the City's policy that these older homes off er the most f easible and desirable way of providing housing f or young f amilies. As of 1970, 6.6 percent of Mendota Heights' housing stock was in the price range aff ordable to low and moderate income persons. There are a number of older small homes on small lots in the northeast portion of Mendota Heights which should help to meet this need and this eff ort is encouraged by the City. - — --Subsidized-housing-is virtually-the-only way the City_of_ Mendota_Heights_can expand its supply of low and moderate income housing. The City is currently a member of the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority and will continue to work with that Agency to provide low and moderate p� hn��c;nn n��_a crattara� citP hacic ThrPP S tinn $ xietlnQ hOUSInQ Un1tS and On2 Unit Of Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation has been provided through the HRA as of August 1982. - 17 - In addition, twelve units of Section 8 202 housing have been provided at Dakota Adults, a group home f or mentally and physically retarded adults. This project was approved in 1979 by the City Council and construction was completed in mid 1980. The City also provides opportunities for a variety of housing types and sizes through the Planned Unit Development (PUD) procedure. The PUD provisions are intended to allow f or additional flexi- bility in housing development and to promote innovative planning and design solutions. 3. Housing Maintenance and Rehabilitation Mendota Heights does not have a substantial problem in terms of housing conditions at the present time. Two indicators of housing conditions traditionally used are overcrowded units and units lacking some or all plumbing f acilities. In terms of these indicators, Mendota Heights has a lower percentage than is typical for other similar suburban cor�nunities. According to the 1970 Census, 5.5 percent of the housing units in Mendota Heights were overcrowded compared with seven percent in the Metropolitan Area. The Metropolitan Area had 3.4 percent of all units lacking one or more plumbing f acilities in 1970, compared to 0.8 percent in Mendota Heights. In addition, the 1970 Census indicates that Mendota Heights had 120 units built bef ore 1939 and worth less than $20,000. The 1974 "Survey of Housing Conditions" showed that Mendota Heights has 171 housing units whose condition already had or would soon warrant rehabilitation. Because a portion of the City's housing stock was constructed bef ore 1960, it is likely that the City may need to place a greater emphasis on rehabilitation in the next decade. For the present, the City will continue to rely on available programs such as through the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority. To date, the Dakota County HRA has weatherized sixteen households and rehabilitated an additional six housing units in the City through use of State and Federal rehabilitation programs. C. HOUSING POLICIES The purpose of the housing policies included here is to outline major directions in housing and to identify what the City ofi Mendota Heights is striving to achieve in solving the identified needs. These policies, then, should serve as guidelines f or determining the appropriate actions to ensure the availability of quality housing f or existing and prospective Mendota Heights resi- GOALS: 1. To perpetuate a high quality residential development. : 2. Maintain the existing residential areas of the City. Residential Growth It is important that residential growth occur in areas where full services are available or areas where full services can be provided in a timely f ashion bef ore development cor�nences. In order to maintain the fiscal integrity of the City, it is imperative that the residential growth rate does not exceed the capability of the City to provide full services to these areas. By managing growth to those areas where services are available or can be provided, the quality and character of the com- munity can be ensured. Policies: 1. Continue a reasonable rate of residential growth which does not exceed the ability of the City to provide services. 2. Guide residential growth in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan so that they can be properly served by public f acilities and in order to retain the character and quality of the community. Residential Environment In order to ensure a quality residential environment, it is important that adequate consideration be given to the design of housing areas. The site layout should be responsive to the natural terrain and amenities. The design standards f or streets, lighting should be aesthetically pleasing. The underlying soil conditions and sensitive slopes should be respected. Policies: 1. Pursue high standards of residential development in the City. 2. Provide a desirable residential land use pattern taking into account the acceptability ofi the land which has unusal soil conditions. Compaitible Development__ � �_ _ _ _ One pressing residential concern is the fear that incompatible development and the resulting traffic will encroach into established neighborhoods and residential areas. Industrial or commercial develop- ment located in or in close proximity to resi en ia areas can e rac r neighborhood and the values of the property therein. One reason f or this is that the size and design of structures are of ten inconsistent with structures in the neighborhood. - 19 - 0 These differing land uses can co-exist in proximity to residential areas when carefully developed with sensitive transitions between uses. Each situation must be carefully considered bef ore the �issue of compatibility can be decided. It is important to protect the character and quality of existing neigh- borhoods from the negative impacts caused by incompatible developments. Policy: Require proper screening and landscaping between residential development and diff ering land uses. S af ety The residential environment should be designed and maintained so as to provide saf e and sanitary housing units as well as to provide access f or public saf ety and service vehicles. Policies: 1. Require adequate, saf e, and sanitary housing f or all inhabitants of the City. 2. Design neighborhood subdivisions to ensure adequate access within and between neighborhoods f or public saf ety and service vehicles. Open Housing The City of Mendota Heights does not condone discriminatory housing practices in the sale or rental of housing. Housing units in Mendota Heights must be open to f amilies and individuals without regard to income level or cultural, racial, religious, or ethnic background. Policy: Promote f air housing practices. Low and Moderate Income Housing Since, the cost of market rate housing is beyond the reach of some Mendota Heights residents, espe- cially senior citizens; the City of Mendota Heights will consider the development of low and moderate income housing units f or f amilies and elderly. Policies:— 1. Continue to work the-Dakota-County-Housing-and�Redevelopment Authority to provide low and moderate income housing on a scattered site basis. - 20 - 2. Consider the use of Federal, State, and local resources in order to obtain funds f or the purpose,of providing low and moderate income housing. D. HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM The City will take the following action to implement the housing policies of the proceeding section. 1. Low and Moderate Income Housing The City will continue to participate in the Dakota County HRA as it has done since 1975. Currently through the Dakota County HRA, Mendota Heights is covered by both the Section 8 Rent Assistance Program (3 units) and the Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Program (1 unit). Also, the City will continue to participate in the-Dakota County HRA Weatherization and Rehabilitation Programs. As of September 1982 sixteen households in the City have been assisted through the Weatherization Program and an additional six households have been assisted through MHFA and HUD Rehabilitation Grant and Loan Programs. In addition, the City will continue to consider assisted housing proposals by non profits and private developers for assisted housing. Mendota Heights has shown its willingness to con- sider projects on a case by case basis. For instance, in mid 1980 Dakota Adults a f ederally assisted group home (12 units Section 202 project with Section 8 assistance) f or mentally and physically retarded adults was completed. In approving th�is project the City Council granted a conditional use permit on a unanimous vote after public hearings on the proposal. Finally, since traditional federal programs cannot be relied upon in the future the City will consider using local financing tools (e.g. MRB's and tax increment financing) to assist in meeting the needs of its low and moderate income citizens. - 2. Housing Element of City Comprehensive Plan The City of Mendota Heights recognizes that the housing element of the comprehensive plan requires some modifications. The f ollowing are the main reasons why in 1979 (the year the plan was developed) that Mendota_Heights was unable to prepare a housing chapter of the comprehensive plan that met all of the Metropolitan Council criteria: �� TnP nnicP and Pnviromm �tal impact of massive freewav construction in the city were unknown. - 21 - (2) There was a lack of an Metropolitan Council, f or use in connection aircraft noise. agreement between the Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC), and MPCA as to a descriptor for identification of airport noise with local comrnunity planning f or on-the-ground attenuation of The City of Mendota Heights recognizes that once public hearings are held and final agreement is reached by the three Agencies on noise standards that it will be necessary to revise the housing element of the city comprehensive plan. It will be to the City's benefit and advantage to pursue the necessary revisions to the housing element of the comprehensive plan in order to obtain orderly development within the City. 3. Single Family Housing Mortgage Revenue Bond Programs The City, under Chapter 462C of Minnesota Statutes (the "Act"), is authorized to develop and administer single f amily housing programs which may be financed by revenue bonds issued by the City. Because ofi' the size of the City and its limited staff, the City may wish to delegate to the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA") the power to act on its behalf in issuing revenue bonds whenever it determines that such action will enable the City to fulfill the housing goals and policies set forth in this housing plan. In issuing revenue bonds and carrying out single f amily housing finance programs, the City is authorized to excercise, within its boundaries, any'of the powers that the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency is authorized to exercise. It is possible that the City may wish to establish or delegate the HRA to establish single f amily housing finance programs to make or to acquire, by contracting and entering into advance commitments to acquire, mortgage loans to finance the acquisition of single family housing located within its boundaries. The City does not have extensive experience in making, servicing or administrating single f amily mortgage loans, and does not wish to add staff or hire new personnel with lending experience. If the City were to undertake single f amily mortgage revenue bond programs, it would instead anticipate making and executing contracts with lending institutions f or_ the origination of_mortgage loans and the sale of such loans to the City. In addition, the City would make and execute a contract with a"program - administrator" which is experienced in mortgage loan originating and servicing, f or the moni- for com liance with the City's requirements and the requirements of the Act and for the servicing of the mortgage loans. - 22 - The City will not, in developing such programs, hire additional staff for the administration of such programs, but may enter into contracts with program administrators, who will admi- nister the mortgage loans for compliance with the City's guidelines and for the servicing of the mortgage loans. The City may also select and contract with a bond trustee experienced in trust matters to administrate the bonds sold to finance its programs by maintaining the various funds and accounts created by program documents and by making bond payments as they become due, to bondholders from program generated revenues. Insof ar as the City expects to be contracting with bond underwriters, legal counsel, the program administrator, originating mortgage lenders and a trustee, all of whom will be reim- bursed f rom bond proceeds and revenues generated by the City's individual programs, admi- nistrative costs will not be paid f rom the City's budget with respect to either the origination of and maintenance of mortgage loans or revenue bonds sold to finance programs which may be developed by the City. To sell revenue bonds for the purchase of mortgage loans under single f amily housing programs the City or HRA must adopt, by resolution, a relevant housing program document for each such program following a public hearing on each program document, notice for which shall be published at least 15 days prior to the date of the hearing. Each housing program document must incorporate certain specific information necessary to qualify the issuance of revenue bonds under the requirements of the Act, and each program must be submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency f or review and approval, according to the requirements of the Act. Following such approval the City or the HRA may by resolution authorize, issue and sell its revenue bonds, which bonds shall be payable only from proceeds of such bonds and continuing program revenues. Any bonds so issued by the City or the HRA will not be general obligat�ions of the City or the HRA and will not in any way be secured by the taxing powers of either the HRA or the City. Proceeds from the sale of bonds must be placed in trust with the trustee, who will, under the terms of a trust indenture, deposit into separate accounts funds which will be used f or the purpose of acquiring mortgage loans, funding any necessary bond reserve funds and paying bond issuance expenses. Mortgage loans which may be purchased by the City or the HRA from the proceeds of revenue bonds sold to finance any-single-f amily mortgage program will carry interest rates and amor- _ tization terms that shall be agreed upon in writing between the mortgage lenders and the City or the HRA prior to the purchase by the trustee, acting on behalf of the City or the HRA, of" suc mor gage oans. n an , ^;^+^�^�+ N,+o ap +h� mor�.agP -23- loans and the �interest rate on revenue bonds sold to finance the program will represent only the costs of insurance premiums which may be required on the mortgage loans, amortized expen- ses of issuing and ma�intaining the revenue bonds, the City's or the HRA's ongoing costs f or adm�inistrating all its housing programs, f ees of servicing and administrating the mortgage loans and trustee and paying agent fees. In establishing individual single f amily housing programs, the City or the HRA must consider and establish, among other matters, purchase price limits with regard to residences being purchased under such programs and l�imits on the income of persons and f amilies eligible to participate in the programs, all in accordance with the requirements of the Act which specifi- cally establishes maximum purchase price and income limits. . In establ�ishing any single f amily mortgage revenue bond programs, the City may wish to establish target areas in accordance with the requirements of the Act. In addition, the City or the HRA may wish to consider and adopt restrictions on the assumability of mortgage loans, a list of lenders eligible f or participation in such programs, set-asides of mortgage purchase funds for persons or f amilies of particular income levels or for particular housing units or projects, program participation fees to be charged buyers and sellers of housing units to be financed by the programs and contributions of non-bond proceeds to be made to the programs. 5. 1983 Single Family Housing Revenue Bond Program The City proposes to authorize the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment to issue housing revenue bonds during 1983 to assist the development of a first time homebuyerJsenior c�itizen program. It is anticipated that the Program will meet the following conditions: 1. Issue Size: $7,000,000 to $10,000,000 (f or the Cities of Mendota Heights, West Saint Paul, and Eagan, jointly). 2. Mortgage Loans: $6,500,000 to $9,300,000 to 110 to 155 mortgage loans. The loan fund may be initia1ly allocated between the three cities and reallocated based upon demand. 3. Type of Housing: New and/or existing housing with a reservation for the developer of __ senior citizen housing project-f or-the purchasers--of housing units sold by the senior citizens. One-half to two-thirds of the mortgage loan fund may be reserved f or the developer. - 24 - 4. Mortgage Loan Interest Rate: Interest rate f or mortgage loans to be determined based upon conditions at the time of the issuance of bonds. (Under present conditions interest rates could be between 10.5q and 11.5�.) 5. Program Income Limits: 100% of the mortgage loans wi11 be reserved f or six months f or individuals and f amilies with �incomes less than 80q of the maximum program income per- mitted by the Act. After the first six months, the maximum income will be the maximum permitted by the Act. After the first six months, up to 20q of the mortgage loans may be ----- — made without_regard to income 1imits in the target area. 6. Bond Sale: Bonds will be publicly off ered unless a private placement can be arranged. 7. Bond Sale Date: Bonds will be issued during calendar year 1983. 8. Purchase Price Limits: New Housing (Target Area) -$102,520; New Housing (Other) - $94,380; Existing Housing -$75,600. These limits may be adjusted as permitted by the Act or federal regulations. 9. Eligible Lenders: All qualified lenders doing business in the City and other interested lenders. 10. Loan Aff ordability: Attachment 1 shows aff ordability f or various purchasers under various conditions. 11. Target Areas: For development purposes the City Council has designated the entire city as a 472A development district, theref or the entire city qualifies as a target area. 12. Monitoring: During the period mortgage loans are made and purchased, the City will receive monthly reports showing the income and f amily composition of mortgagors, their former place of residence and type of housing unit moved from. -25- 4. Multif amily Housing Revenue Bond Programs The City is also authorized to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of assisting in the acquisition or construction or other provision of multif amily housing within its boundaries. In carrying out multif amily housing finance programs under the Act, the City is aga�in authorized to exercise, within its boundaries, any and all of the powers that the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency is authorized to exercise. Much like the single family mortgage revenue bond programs which may be developed by the City, the City must, prior to issuing any multi-f amily housing revenue bonds adopt an individual housing program document which sets forth certain specific information necessary to qualify the program under the requirements of the Act including such information as the number of len- ders who will be participating in the program, the-amount of bonds to be issued and the amount of loans to be made, whether occupants of the housing units will be subject to income limits, whether rental rates will be market rates or subsidized, the administrative requirements of the City with respect to such programs and the costs to the City, if any, of the programs, and certain other information. A public hearing must be held on each program after publication of notice in a newspaper circulating generally in the City at least 15 days before the hearing, after which the program may be adopted with or without amendment. Each program, following adoption, must be submitted to the Minneosta Housing Finance Agency for review and approval. The City may also designate the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority to act on its behalf whenever it finds that such action will assist the City in fulfilling the housing goals and policies set forth in this housing plan. � ,� � s a � z �� 0 ATTACHMENT 1 ASSUMPTIONS: (A) MORTGAGE INTEREST RATE: llo � (B) LOAN TO VALUE RATIO: 89�°s (C) INCOME: 8�o OF MAXIMUM PROGRAM INCOME • FAMILY SIZE ---------------------------------- 2 ADULTS 2 ADULTS '1_ CHILD --------- --------- GROSS It�COME $ 26668 $ 27168 A�7JUST�D GP.OSS INCOME $ 25168 $ 25168 P?:NCIP�,L Ii�'TEREST TAXES rt:D I�SUR�t�CE $ INSQR�'-,NCE S TAYES S : �I:�'C � P=:L n?�D I�TER�ST $ !�i 'l m r '� /` ^ Y � i�tt � vr.v� PL�CHASE FR�CE $ t 733.37 137.8a - 58.7� 536.a3 � 56871 71U�8° $ $ $ S $ 7�7.?2 140.3H 59.84 s�6.a� � I 57c27 � �l�sc ; . 2 ADULTS 2 CHILDREN $ 27668 $ 251 68 $ 76�.E7 $ 142.97 $ 6C.°5 $ 556.96 � ss�s�. $ 731E5 0 ASSUMPTIONS: . {A) N,ORTG�GE INTEREST RATE: 11$ (B) LOAN TO VALUE RATYO: 950 (C) INCOME: 8�a OF MAXIMUM PROGRAM SNCOME FAMILX SIZE -__________�--------------------------------- 2 ADULTS 2 ADULTS 2 ADULTS 1 CHILD 2 CHILDREN _________ __--_---- --_---____ GROSS INCOME $ 26668 $ 27168 S 2?668 ADJUSTE� GR�SS INCOME $ 2516$ $ 25168 $ 251$$ PpIi�:CI�nL It�TEP.EST TAXES srvD INSUR':?�CE $ 733.37 � t�'SURrivC:� � � $ 121 . 23 'T:�XES � $ 5$.�� PRItvCI P�' L nl�tD INT�RESm $ 553. �`. � '�'•C? t•GnGE $ 58111 � 4��.�i:%a7✓ �'Y�� b? 61? 6° 0 t S ' ' $ S S S S 747.12 123.5� sz.�� 571.�2 5996? ! � r 5311r � i . , $ 76�.87 S 125.77 $ 53.�7 S 581.53 S 61.�e4 � �� 6�27$ a A:. ;,PTIOI�S: - ' (A) MORTGAGE INTEREST RATE: 11% (B) LOAN TO VALUE RATIO: 800 (C) INCOME: 108o OF MAXIMUM PROGRAM INCOME FAMILY SIZE 2 ADULTS 2 2 ADULTS 1 CHILD 2 C1 ROSS It�COME . $ 32960 $ 3346H $ .D�USTED GP,OSS INCON,E $ � 31�6�i $ 31960 $ 'RINCIPAL I?�T�REST T�XES ' AND ItiSURANCE $ 966.C6 $ 926.15 $ �hSURANCE $ 17�.31 $ 172.9Q $ �A._�S � S i2.6Q $ 73.70 - S ��;Tj�CTa�.L ?:^:D It�T�REST $ 663.�8 $ 67�.55 S iOrTGrG� $ 6967�i $ 7U�727 S >r.i:tC'r':.'-:5�� aRiCE S E7 ��88x .$ '�8t�9''` 1 S *.EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM ALLOi��ABLE PRICE FOR EXISTING HOUSF 0 ADULTS . ILDREN 3396� 31560 °33.°� 175.�8 74.81 583.61 7�7�3 89720* ;S , � �b ?TIONS: (A) MORTGAGE INTEREST R�TE: llo (B) LOAN TO VALUE RATIO: 950 (C) INCOME: 18�o OF MAXIMUM PROGRAM INCOME � FAMILY SIZE ---------=----------------------------- ` Z ADULTS 2 2 ADULTS 1 CHILD 2 C� ROSS INCOME $ 32968 $ 3346� $ D�USTED GROSS INCOME $' 31068 $ 3146� $ RI�CIF�L I�TEREST TAXLS F�t�D It�SURANCE S ?��SURANCE $ � � . .� J yS �I?�CIF�L ':\D I�^�REST $ 0�^G.'-:G� S ��C'r'•:;c� p�IC� $ °�6.�� 149.83 63.81 692.76 %��G_� 765i3* $ 92Q.15 $ 152.1� $ 6c.78 $ 7�3.27 $ %��9 S 77736�• i * EXCEEDS THL MAXINUM ALL04dABLE PRICE FOR EXISTING HOUSE ADULTS ILDREN 3396� 3106� 933.90 154.37 65.75 713.7� �!oS1 788°6* � A-_�MPTIO�S: . (A) MORTG�GE INTEREST RATE: 12.5% (B; LOAN TO VALUE RATIO: 8(30 �(C) INCONiE: 80 o OF MAXIMUM PROGRAM INCOME FANSILY SIZE -------------------------------------- ------ 2 ADULTS 2 ADULTS 2 ADULTS 1 CHILD . 2 C ILDREN --------- --------- --- ------ �ROSS INCON,E . $ 26668 $ 27168 $ 27668 :�DJUSTED GROSS I1�CONfE $' 25168 $ 25168 $ 25168 ?R1�.CI rZL I[� i �,REST TAXES A�D 1NSURANCE $ I h SUR�,NCE $ � ti,. �. S S ?RI�CI?::L r�D I�iER�S'" $ •�0?�G-�� S �tl�� :iy�E Ph1C� $ 0 o � . 733.37 126.65 53.98 552.74 5791G 72328 m 7�7.12 129.�3 Sg.Qo 563.1C SC;61 68C51, $ 76�.87 $ 131.�� S 56.�Q $ �i3.t7 � J J / J � $ 6i166 0 0 � A`'-'��'�PTIOI�S: ( A) MORTGr,GE I NTEREST RATE : 12 . 5 0 (B) LOAN TO VALUE RRTIO: 95% (C) INCOME: 8(3o OF MAXIMUM PROGRANf INCOME �ROSS II�COME :DJUSTED GROSS INCOME �RINCIPAL INTEREST TAXES AN� I�SURAt�CE =taS.UrcAI�CE ,- -S �RIt�CIPAL P.I�D I�TEREST :0�:'"G=GE =U:�C i�S� ?RICE a ' � c FAMILY SIZE -------------------------------------- 2 ADULTS 2 2 ADULTS 1 CHILD 2 C --------- --------- --- $ 26668 $ 27168 $ $ 25168 $ 25168 $ S 733.37 $ � ?10.°6 $ �7.3g $ 575.11 $ 53887 $ 56?23 $ $ S $ S S 747.12 113.�9 48.19 5s5.89 5�8°7 577E6 m $ $ $ S Y S ADULTS IILDREN 2�66s 25168 76e.87 115.12 49.08 596.67 55°E% 5�0�0 � m A�MPTIO!�S : (A) MORTGAGE iNTEREST RATE: 12.So �(B) LOAN TO VALUE RATIO: 8�% (C) INCOME: l��o OF MAXINiUM PROGRAM INCOME FAMILY SIZE ---------'----------------------------- ------ ' 2 ADULTS 2 ADULTS 2 ADULTS 1 CHILD 2 C ILDREN --------- --------- --- ------ �ROSS INCOME $ 32960 $ 33460 $ 3396� �CJUSTED ��oss INCO:°SE $� 3196G� _ $ 31�60 s 31�66 ?RINCT_PaL IhTER�ST TAXES AI�D ItvSGRArCE $ °06. �P �?�SURAi�CE $ 156.5� i, � S $ 6 6. 71 �pI?�CIPnL �:�� I�TEREST $ 683.15 ,.C� ,,GT..GE $ 6��1C ?C�RCH��= ?RICE � 8v4313* $ 92�.15 $ 158.°1 $ 67.72 $ 693.52 C EL•a?y S • E1226* S 933.90 $ 161.28 . $ 68.7t S 7�3.88 S �5�.7� i � � ' S d2«G� 0 * EXCEEDS THE NAXIMUM ALLOWABLE PRICE FOR EXISTINGIHOUS S , � . . I . . - ' i { r �SUMPTIOt:S : . (�) MURTGAGE INTEREST RATE: 12.50 (B) LOAN TO VALL'� RATIO: 950 (C) INCONfE: 1(3(3 o OF MAXIMUM PROGRRM INCOME GROSS I\COME F,DJLiSTED GROSS INCOME PR�NC�P?�L IrT�REST TAXES L�D I�SUR�NC� I��SLRAtvCE • "- XES PRINCIPvL F?��D INTEREST ;�o��: c?:c� � �?=C�..S� :'NiC� ', Q . FAMILY SIZE ------------------------------------- ------- 2 ADULTS 2 ADULTS 2 ADULTS 1 CHILD 2 CHILDREN --------- --------- — -------- $ 32960 $ 3346� $ 33968 $ 31Q60 $ 3146� $ 31460 $ 9�6.�0 $ 137 .14 $ 58.c6 $ 719.8Q $ 66oG�1 $ 7G106 92�.15 139.22 5°.35 721.58 67611 71169 933.96 1�1.3Q 6(3.25 732.36 6°621 �32s5 October 1, 1982 T0: FROM: SUBJECT: Orvil Johnson, Mendota Heights Administrator Gene Lange, Fire Marshall FIRE DEPARTMENT REMOTE FIRE PAGER TRANSMITTER The radio pager system for the fire department is a little over si years old. During this period of time we have had considerable problems with the tripping of the pagers. Some of the problems can be attribute to the equipment itself. However, I feel, as I have expressed to you many times, the major problem that we have with the paging system not f nctioning properly is do to the fact that the W. St. Paul transmitter and an enna tower are located at an elevation several hundred feet lower than he top of Marthalar hill. The W. St. Paul transmitter has the power and fficiency to trip our pagers in an acceptable radius except in a pie shaped one directly west of the transmitter. This cone encompasses the geogr phic area of Mendota Heights causing secondary reception quality from t e transmitter. When the pagers were first purchased they were serviced by the Elf Company in Hudson, Wisconsin. The pagers that were turned into me activating were given to Mr. Ed Fina who in turn would take them t in Hudson, Wisconsin. On a number of occasions the pagers that we in as not operating correctly would perform on his work bench with repair. I have personally carried my pager as far north as No. St as far So.as Hastings and had it activate. It is my opiniom and a opinion of several radio technicians, including Mr. Davis of Davis that a remote transmitter located in Mendota Heights would solve a of these problems. I have negotiated an agreement with school district �6197 through D to use the Somerset School facilities as a location for a remote t As you know in our discussion several weeks ago we also investigat High School which is at a slightly higher elevation, however, phon to this location in the amount of $60.00 per month makes it financ desireable. Continuing the investigation that Somerset School lie the 450 exchange and telephone service for that location is approx $11.50 a month. I have negotiated a purchase agreement with Mr. S of the Nelson Radio Service to install a single channel, transmitt radio and antenna system on the Somerset School for the amount of This price includes the remote microphone installation at the W. S Communications Center. It should be noted that W. St. Paul would ability to use their transmitter to broadcast our calls should pho Communications as not � his shop e turned �ut any Paul and .so the Electronics, maj ority .. Zahn -ansmitter. ad Sibley : service ! ally un- � within _mately :even Nelson :r only , >2,394.50. :. Paul �etain their ie service -z- " ba interrupted ar power fail at Somerset School. It should a2so be noted that W. St. Paul could use this transmitter as a back up for �heir own system. I sincerely hope tha� you will look favorably upon our reques� for this additional radio equigment, and that yau will bring it to the cauncil's attentian at your earliest possible convenience. In the 19$2 Capi�al Impravement Program the fire department requested a sum of $28,000.00 for opticom equipment. It was based on an estimate of the cost of equipment that goes on the fire trucks plus the installatian of opticom at Hwy. 55 and Mendota Road as well as Hwy. 149 and �wy, I10. As we discussed several days ago the project at Hwy 149 and Hwy. 110 had been postponed until sometime Z9$3. We have purchased the five apticom emitters at a cost of $5,735.Q0. The opticom equipment should by installed at Hwy. 55 and Mendota Heights Road this year at a cost af approximately $6,04Q.00. This wauld indicate a balance of approximately $I6,000.00 in our request for opticom equipment. I would like to reques� that you consider using a small portion of this unused balance ta finance the cost of�our remote radio sys�em. GL/rmd NOTE TO COUNCIL: I believe that Gene has struck upon �he correct solution far questianable pager operatian. This amount of investment shoulcl result in bet�er £,ire alertang. It shauld be given serious considera�ion. OJJ 1Q-14-82 OF C3t7CJt7 3795 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 October 12, 1982 Rc•...-�Vrf1 ...! •_ QGi 1 � 1982I To: Duncan H. Baird, Mayor, Sunfish Lake Orvil Johnson, City Administrator, Mendota Heights Bob Schaefer, City Administrator, Inver Grove Heights Dear Gentlemen : BEA BLOM9UIST Ntoya THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Councd Members THOMAS HEDGES City AUmirvstwta EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Gty Clerk A meeting is scheduled at the Eagan City Hall on Wednesday, October 27, 1982, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of reviewing and discussing the proposed guidelines for land use compatibility with aircraft noise. Pub ic hearings are scheduled before the Metropolitan Council in December, an it seemed appropriate that our mayors and/or city council members b given an opportunity to review the proposed guidelines and discuss the ame� before final presentations are made that represent our communities at hose public hearings. Mr. Dale Runkle, City Planner, City of Eagan, and John Shardlo , Planning Consultant for the City of Mendota Heights and an employee of H ward Dahl- gren & Associates, will be present to explain the proposed gu delines for land use compatibility with aircraft noise as prepared by the etropolitan Council. Please send this council members October 27. Sincerely, notice of invitation to your respective mayors �and/or city and plan to join us for this discussion on I Wednesday, ��.� �� --- Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd cc: Dale Runkle John Shardlow NOTE TO COUNCIL: I would urge your attendance and in order to: 1. Become better acquainted with the tions and impact on development; 2. Determine our response to up-c ipation . � � estric- � I � hearings. ! Please refer to the Guideline Booklet as a HANDOUT on October 5th. O.J.J. 10-15-82 THE LONE OAK TREE. ..7HE SYMBOL AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 1� G� ��'r�C�� _�{ I-494 RIVER CROSSING DEDICAT�ON - NOVEMBER � i�s2 i�oo p.M. HISTORY AND FACTS ABOiTT I-�94 AND THE MINNESOTA RIVER C�ROSSING PR�1�CT D�SCRIPTION AND (�PENING �7AT�S The I-4g4/Minnesota River Bridge is a part af an 11 mi.le long project. This 11 mile stretch of sz�c-lane f'reeway is the only uncompleted segment of the I-494I69� Twin Cities Circumferential Beltline Raute. The project will be buil.t and opened ta traffic in twa basic sta�es: 1. A four-mile sectian frQm 24th Avenue i.n Bloomington to High- way 55 in Eagan and Mendata Heights - Open November g 1.982 {with temporary connec�ions . 2. A seven-mile sectian.from High- way 55 to Fifth Avenue in South St. Pau1. - Open 1985. Possibly an interim section wil1. be apened ta traffic - prior to 1985. . PR�1�CT PLANNINC P1.anning for the Riuer Bridge and the 1Z mi.le pra ject began �.rl 1956 . Public Hearings were held in 1956, 1963, 197� and 1977. Construction wa.� s�arted in 197I. . but was ha].ted in 1973.because new Iegislation requzred further environ- mental studies. The Drafi Environmenta.l Impact State- ment was published in July, ].977. The Final Environmen�al.Impact State- ment was published and approved duaring 1979. Now canstructian is,completed for the four-mile section from 24th Avenue to Highway 55. {This will give traffic nother river crossing to help relieve " .he Mendota Bricige congestian). RIV�R BRIDG�' FSTZMAT�D TR�I�FIC For the opening year i9$2�- 30,000 vehicles per day. For the design year 2003 vehicl.es per day. RIV�R BRI�G� D�STGN 63,000 The I-494 Bridge ov�r the Minnesota River is actually two ind vidual bridges separaied by abau two fee�. Each bridge is ai�out 4 50 feet Io . One bridge will car'ry the westbaund traific, the other wi11 c ry sast- bound traffic. � Each bridge has three 12-: lan�s and twa ten-foat sa; for a tatal width of 56 f� rail.ings . .The easibound ' addition, an eight-foat w, trail on �he upstream sid� wi1,1 connect� trail system ton with those in Eagan a Snelling State Park. A c� also be made to the Natio� Refuge on the Bloamington river. 1 PRt1.7FCT COSTS The I-4941M�.nnesota River plus $50,000 ciean up. Mainline grading, paving, east end of bridge to Tru: $7,304,000. i Cost of bridges at Trunk : and Interstate 494 = $8,8 ��4��k 0 �ot driving �ty shoul.ders �t between rzdge has, iri ie pedestrian . The tra�..I in Blooming- � in For� rinection wil1. al Wildlife side of �he $22,7].4,QQ0 c . , from Highway 55 -- ,OOQ. 55 ��NNESp�.� �° tio � a � � ��T OF 'TFiP�� Mir�n�sota De�artment �fi T��a��s�ortati.on District 9 3485 f-Iadley Avenu�; North, Box 2050 North St. Paul, ti�innesot� �5109 October 8, 1982 Mr. Orvil J. Johnson City Administrator Mendota Heights City Hall 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 Dear Mr. Johnson: The current construction of I-35E in Meadota Heights includes bridg and grading items with paving scheduled for letting in January 1984 opening the later part of the year. Noise abatement is proposed fo the Valleq View Heights area located between Wagon Wheel Trail and T.H. 110. The current contract includes the construction of an ear nound in this area which provides the most suitable location for a wall. 4G T .� � �:: 1 .� ti � (612) 770•2311 and se Information on the proposed noise wall is now available for present$tion to the affected residents. Mn/DOT policy on noise walls requires fbr�al City approval. City approval of the final plan is also required pr or to letting (1984). Experience gained f rom our noise wall projects hows that the residents acceptance of the final product is directly rela ed to their involvement in the preliminary meeting. ! Your assistance in arranging this informational meeting vith the re is requested. This meeting will probably take two houra with a nin one hour if everybody is in agreement. A formal resolution is requ the F.H.W.A. if the residents do not want a aoise wall. Please con Larry Erb, Noise & Air Quality Supervisor (770-2311, ext. 282) if q any questions. i Sincerely, ' ��__._- Kermit K. McRae, P.E. District Engineer. /1/0 7�e To C'o u ri c; I s wy.q � ,s �- i�'l�.r �/i' � # Ed a ssi,J f /l o �s f'� i s An Equal Opporrunify Employer ��55 7�`a J /f' ; ia m of d by t have �l70T' J✓ �s�e2 � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO October 14, 1982 TO: City Council FROM: Larry Shaughnessy Treasurer SUBJECT: Proposed Certificates of Indebtedness 1982 & 1983 Purchases With the 1983 budget now just about determined, it is time that e consider the issue of certificates of indebtedness for the equipment which has been purchased during 1982 and the projected 1983 purchases. It is to our advantage to complete this issue prior to December 5, as some changes in the.1982 Federal Tax Act will in the future increase our b rrowing costs. All Bonds issued after January 1, will have to be in register d form, and we will have additional expense for a trustee on each issue. As of the present time, it looks like we will have to issue abou $170,000 in Certificates to pay for all past purchases and those planned in 19 3. This breaks down as follows: Balance in Acca.ixnt 12-31-81 ($1 ,157) 1982 Expenses Budget Actual Sirens $28,000 $29,609 Police Cars 18,000 18,856 Equipment 510 I Radio 4,500 4,521 Fire Truck 10,000 12,900 Truck Equipment 10,000 10,000 est Opticom 28,000 11,735 Fire Equipment 4,000 4,000 Street Tractor 8,000 8,000 est Total 110,500 101,132 101 132 1983 Budget 40 000 Total 156 300 Issue Expense Capitalized Interest First Year Total Issue Less Sale of Old Police Cars 1982 Sale 1983 sale Est. 4,250 3,500 2 11 170 7 �700 ',900 ,900 ,750 Page Two In the past, we have aimed at a one (1) mill levy to repay the certificates which are outstanding. On our present time table, we could be considering the next certificate issue in December of 1984. The following table shows how the next issue might fit in. YEAR 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 EXISTING ISSUE $62,000 74,000 72,000 -0- PRINCIPAL INTEREST $70,000 50,000 50,000 Cap . $11,900 11,900 7,000 3,500 EST. TAXABLE VALUE PAYMENT $71,620,000 $74,000 75,000,000 83,900 80,000,000 81,900 85,000,000 57,000 90,000,000 53,500 MILL ESTIMATE If the next issue is put out in 1984, the first levy could be in 1986. 1.03 1.11 1.02 .67 .57 7 � �eptember 7, 1982 1 City ordinance delegates housin power to HRA and authorizes of revenue bonds. Sets public hearing date f or Housing Plan. � at i east 30 days f rom published notice) . ACTIONS REQ,UIRED BY S�__� LAW FOR SINGLE-FAMILY REVENUE BONU PROPOSALS: October 19, 1982 November 16, 1982 . December 7, 1982 January 2, 1983 ru�iic nearing. City adopts Housing Plan. Submits to Metropolitan Counci 1 for review and comment. (Met. Council ha 45-days for review.) NOTES: City Council sets public hearing date for Housing at east Pro ram. 15 days f rom published notice) Spring, 1983 HRA prepares tax increment plan. County/school district reviews tax increment plan. HRA adopts tax increment plan. City Council approves tax increment plan. city [;ounci i holds public hearing and adopts Housing Proqram. � housing rian ana Program submit- ted to Minnesota Housing Finance AQencv. , 1983 Before December 31, 1983 NKN passes Hous- ing Board sale Housing Revenue Resolution. Bond Closin4. p�� G�i� January 20, 1982 Minnesota Hous- ing Finance Agency allocates Housing Board Authoritv. 1. Between September and December, cities of West St. Paul and Eagan follow same sequence of events; but--at specific dates coinciding with their City Council meeting dates. �: .1 � p � 2. Dakota County HRA does preparation of Housing Plan and Housing Program for the cities. � . r oug ous�ng ans may vary, ous�ng rogram wi e, the same for each participating ,� city.) r� 3. Developer will commence development process after MHFA approval (January 20, 1983). � •�r � .� � ' , --- .�