1994-03-15` Y '+�
s:K�� ' =,n+
r
o,
y
'�'� CITY OF b�NDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA CO�NTY, MINN�SOTA
�Gffi�TD�
..
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
March 1S, 1994 - 7:30 P.bi.
Agenda Adoption
Approval of March 3rd Minutes
Coa$ent Calendar
a. Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's Report for Fe ruary.
b. Approval of RLSOLIITION NO. 94-19, Supporting the City of
Eagan�s ISTEA Application for Trail Funding.
c. Acknowledgment of the March 8th Parks and Re reation
Commission Minutes.
d. Approval of Non-Conservation Classification of F rfeited
Property - RESOLUTIOIa N0. 94-20
e. Approval to Solicit Proposals for Hiring a Consu tant in
Designing Traffic Signals at Trunk Highway 49 and
Mendota Heights Road.
f. Acknowledgment of the Fire Department Rep rt for
February.
g. Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authoriz tion to
Advertise for Bids for the Mendota Heights In ustrial
Park Project - RESOLUTION N0. 94-21
h. Approval of St. Thomas Academy Applicati n for
Conditional Use Permit and Variances -
RESOLIITION NOe 94-22
i. Approval of the List of Contractors.
j. Approval of the List of Claims.
End of Consent Calendar
Public Comments
HearinQ
a. Lexington Heights Apartment Financing - 5:00 P. .
S. Bid Award -
* a. Approval of Pilot Knob Road Watermain Bid
1tESOLU'�IOIa NOo 94-23
_
9. �afinished and New Husiness �y
a. Diacuss with Jodie Miller, NDC-4/NDCTV Executive ,,
Director, NDC-4 1994 Budget and Federal Cable
Legislation.
b. Review and Discuss Supplemental Report on Painting of the .
Water Tower. .
c. Discuss North Rensington Concept Design Plan. '
** d. Discuss Status of City Council/Planning Commission
Workshop Scheduled for March 29th.
10. Gouncil Comments
11. Adjourn
Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upoa rec�uest
at least 120 hours ia advsnce. Ii a aotice of leas thaa 120
hours is received, the City of �eadota Heights will �ake every
attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible
oa short notice. Pleas� contact City Adminiatratioa at
452-1850 with reguests. •
F
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
i� •
March 15, 1994
�
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administr
SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for March 15th Council Meeting
One new item has been added to the Unfinished and New :
section of the agenda (*). Additional information has be�
to item 8a (**) .
3. Agenda Adaption
It is recommended that Council adopt the revised
printed on yellow paper.
8a. Bid Award
Please see attached memo and resolution.
Scheduled for March 29, 1994.
Please see attached memo.
MTL:kkb
�
iness
added
CITY OF b�NDOTl� HEIGHTS
DAKOTA CO�NTYs biINNESOTA
AG��
March 15, 1994 - 7s30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption
4. Approval of March 3rd Minutes
5. Consent Calendar
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g-
h.
i.
J•
Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's Report for Fe ruary.
Approval of RESOLIITION DiO. 94-19, Supporting the City of
Eagan's ISTEA Application for Trail Funding.
Acknowledgment of the March 8th Parks and Re reation
Commission Minutes.
Approval of Non-Conservation Classification of F rfeited
Property - RESOL�T=AN 1JOe 94-20
Approval to Solicit Proposals for Hiring a Consu tant in
Designing Traffic Signals at Trunk Highway 49 and
Mendota Heights Road.
Acknowledgment of the Fire Department Rep rt for
February .
Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authoriz tion to
Advertise for Bids for the Mendota Heights In ustrial
Park Project - RESOLUTION N0. 94-21
Approval of St. Thomas Academy Applicati n for
Conditional Use Permit and Variances -
RESOLIITION NO. 94-22
Approval of the List of Contractors.
Approval of the List of Claims.
End of Consent Calendar
6. Public Comments
7. �earincr ,
a. Lexington Heights Apartment Financing - 8:00 P.I�I.
8. Hid Award
a. Approval of Pilot Knob Road Watermain Bid
Informationp Available on Tuesday.
�
e
9. IIafinished and N�w Buainess
a. Discuss with Jodie Miller, NDC-4/NDCTV Executi�re
Director, NDC-4 1994 Budget and Federal Cable
Legislation.
b. Review and Discuss Supplemental Report on Painting of the
Water Tower.
c. Di.� North Kensington Concept Design Plan.
10. Council Commeats
11. Adjourn
Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon reguest
at least 120 hours ia advance. If a aotice of less thaa 120
hours is received, the City of �ieadota Heights will make ever�r
attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible
on short aotice. Please comtact City Administratioa at
452-1850 with requests.
�
.�
.. �: j
a
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Thursday, March 3, 1994
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting�
City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'cl
at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesotg
of the
�ck P.M.
�
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'cloc�k P.M.
The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Counc}.lmembers
Huber, Koch, Krebsbach and Smith. �
AGENDA ADOPTION
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Councilmember Smith moved adoption o the
revised agenda for the meeting.
Councilmember Huber seconded the mot'on.
Councilmember Smith moved approval o the
minutes of the February 15, 1994 re lar
meeting.
Councilmember Koch seconded the moti n.
CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Koch moved approval of the
consent calendar for the meeting, re ised to
move item 5f, lighting retrofits, to the
regular agenda, along with authoriza ion for
execution of any necessary documents contained
therein.
��
�
Acknowledgment of the minutes oflthe
February 22 Planning Commission �neeting.
Acknowledgment of the Code E
monthly report for February.
c. Approval to purchase a Toro modell 325-D
riding lawn mower with cab for t e Parks
Department from MTI Distributin Company,
for its low bid of $14,145.33 w'th trade.
d. Approval to purchase a Toro 37" regular
deck with 14 hp Kohler Traction Unit
(walk-behind mower) from Polfus Implement,
for its low quote of $2,131.20.
3937
e. Adoption of Resolution No. 94-14, "A
RESOLUTION NOMINATING THE MENDOAT HEIGHTS
VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR THE 1994
MINNESOTA FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY
SERVICE AWARD."
f. Adoption of Resolution No. 94-15, "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA (THE "CITY")
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND
DELIVERY OF THE CITY'S COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS
(CENTRE POIINTE ONE ASSOCIATES PROJECT)
SERIES 1994 (THE "BONDS") WHICH BONDS AND
THE INTEREST AND ANY PREMIUM THEREON SHALL
BE PAYABLE SOLELY FROM REVENUES PLEDGED
THERETO; APPROVING THE FORM OF AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF
THE BONDS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE SECURITY,
RIGHTS AND REMEDIES OF THE OWNERS OF SAID
BONDS."
g. Approval of the promotion of John Boland
from Maintenance Worker II to Maintenance
Worker III effective April 4, 1994.
h. Approval of the list of contractor
licenses dated March 3, 1994 and attached
hereto.
h. Approval of the list of claims dated March
3, 1994 and totaling $221,342.80.
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
LIGHTING RETROFIT Council acknowledged a memo from Building
PROGRAM Manager Guy Kullander regarding energy saving
lighting retrofits for the city offices and
public works maintenance facility.
Councilmember Smith asked what the affect of
the change in lighting will be, particularly
in the Council Chambers since it is used for
meetings. She also asked if NDC-4 had been
contacted to determine whether there will be
any impact on televising meetings.
Administrator Lawell explained that the
program proposed by NSP will not in any way
affect the color or intensity of the lighting,
and that the biggest change will be in the
temperature of the room. The lights which are
3937
r
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
VOLUNTEER WEEK
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
proposed to be installed will not
much heat as the existing lights.
explained the program criteria. A
Lawell stated that he believes the
equipment adjusts to the lighting
further stated that although NDC-4
been contacted, he will do so.
C•
3938
ierate as
: also
Lnistrator
�mera
rel. He
ts not
Councilmember Smith asked what chang' in
fixtures will be required. Administ ator
Lawell responded that he does not be ieve any
fixtures will need to be replaced a in most
cases the there will just be a small r
diameter bulb.
Treasurer Shaughnessy stated that t
City Hall will just involve changin
and bulbs but that fixtures will be
at the Public Works garage. He inf
Council that NSP will finance the c
the work, deducting the savings on
energy bills to pay for an interest
After the cost of the contract has
which is anticipated to be four or
the city will realize the energy sa
Councilmember Smith moved to direct
complete the applications required
energy saving lighting retrofit pro
the City Offices and Public Works g
to request NSP approval to proceed
project.
Councilmember Koch seconded the mot
work at
ballasts
eplaced
tract for
e city's
ree loan.
en paid,
ve years,
ncts .
taff to
r the
am for
age and
th the
Mayor Mertensotto read a proposed p oclamation
to designate April 17-23 as Volunte r Week.
Councilmember Smith moved adoption
"Proclamation Designating April 17-
Volunteer Recognition Week."
Councilmember Huber seconded the mo
a
, 1994 as
ion.
SENIOR CITIZEN Council acknowledged a memo from Ad inistrator
PROPERTY VALUATIONS Lawell regarding proposed adoption f a
resolution urging the state to enac changes
in the property valuation tax laws o provide
fiscal relief to senior citizens.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the m tter is on
the agenda at his request. He expl ined that
3938
3939
after property valuation notices are mailed, a
number of calls from residents are always
received and that he is particularly concerned
when he gets a number of calls from senior
citizens. He stated that in responding to
those calls, he can only explain that state
law controls the county assessor's office and
the assignment of values for tax purposes. He
informed Council that he received one call
from an 80 year old woman whose market value
increased from $97,000 for 1992 to $117,000
for 1993, and then to $120,000 for 1994. He
felt that such increases are unconscionable
for an elderly person and that something must
be done. He pointed out that many seniors
have no way to increase their income and
increases such as this are a big burden, and
stated that this is why he proposes that
Council adopt a resolution to urge the
legislature to provide relief to senior
citizens. He read the proposed resolution for
Council and the audience.
Councilmember Krebsbach expressed concern over
the impact that a change in legislation would
have on state policy and stated that she would
like more time to think about the implications
of opposing state policy.
Councilmember Smith moved adoption of
Resolution No. 94-16, "A RESOLUTION URGING THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA TO ENACT CHANGES IN THE
PROPERTY VALUATION TAX LAWS TO PROVIDE FISCAL
RELIEF TO SENIOR CITIZENS OVERLY BURDENED BY
PROPERTY VALUATION INCREASES."
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 1 Krebsbach
CASE NO. 94-04, Council acknowledged memos from Administrative
ST. THOMAS ACADEMY Assistant Batchelder regarding an application
from St. Thomas Academy for a conditional use
permit for an accessory use and variance to
allow the school to upgrade its football,
soccer and track and field facility, adding
lights, bleachers and a press box. Council
also acknowledged a site plan, a letter from
St. Thomas, planning consultant report, and a
proposed resolution.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the city's
planning consultant, in his report, referred
tosthe athletic facility as a stadium and that
a question arose before the Planning
3939
Commission as to whether a football
an allowed use in the R-1 District.
suggested that, rather than getting
dispute over defining whether the p
for an athletic complex or a stadiu
should hear Mr. Greving's presentat
refer the matter back to the Planni
Commission for consideration of ame:
Zoning Ordinance to allow stadiums
conditional use.
Mr. John Greving, St. Thomas Headma
introduced the following individual
Turpening and Bill Makens (architec
drawing and plans), Dennis Leslie (
Gerry Brown (parking) Jack Zahr (at
and stadium schedules), and Kevin B
Michel, Rob Nordin and Bob Slater.
Greving stated that St. Thomas has
engaged in long-range strategic pla
two years. He explained the Academ
that it is essential to provide an
for the students to compete and bel
it is advisable to improve the athl
facilities on the campus including
addition of field lighting. Mr. Gr
informed Council that the Academy h
on a year-to-year agreement with th
University of St. Thomas for use of
athletic facilities and stated that
Academy has always made its facilit
available for city use. He stated
Eagan uses the Academy's fields for
and baseball and noted that one-qua
students at the school are Mendota
residents.
Mr. Greving stated that the individ
present on behalf of St. Thomas hav
response to Planning Commission con
parking, etc., and are prepared to
Commission's concerns. With respec
interpretation of zoning, he stated
Academy agrees with the interpretat
city staff and city planner that th
fits within the existing Zoning Ord
explained that the proposed improve
serves the purpose of the school an
programs. Mr. Greving stated that
worked with the city's Public Works
on a parking fact sheet which shows
is sufficient parking. He stated t
proposed lighting is state-of-the-a
that if the height variance request
3940
tadium is
He
nto a
posal is
Council
n and
ing the
a
�,
Gary
al
hting) ,
dance
, Kelly
en
ing for
feels
portunity
ves that
ic
operated
ts
s
at Mend-
ootball
er of the
ights
als
come in
itions on
ddress the
to the
that the
on of the
facility
nance. He
ents
its
e has
Director
that there
at the
t, and
d is
3940
3941
granted, it will not alter the character of
the Academy.
Mr. Turpening reviewed the landscape and
lighting design plans. He explained that the
average lighting from end zone to end zone is
50 foot candles and diminishes down to 8 foot
candles on the east-west end of the track. At
about 450 feet from the center of the football
field, the average lighting will be equivalent
to a full moon. He stated that 68 of the 72
luminaries will be focused on the football
field. Mr. Turpening then showed an aerial
photo of St. Thomas and Visitation and a
topographic view of the site, stating that the
facility will be incorporated into a hill to
minimize its impact. He reviewed the proposed
site plan for the stadium, stating that the
football and track fields have existed for
many years and that the proposal is to build a
grandstand and control center at the north end
of the field. He reviewed the flow of
parking, described the grandstand area and
reviewed detail drawings of the control
building. Mr. Turpening showed a view of the
grandstand facing towards the St. Thomas
Academy building, an end elevation of the
facility, a drawing showing the impact on
existing buildings and a drawing of the
facility drawn to scale showing the contours
and topography of the land and the impact of
the sight lines from the Rogers Lake
residential area to the football field.
Mayor Mertensotto asked how many light bars
there will be. Mr. Turpening responded that
there will be three bars on each 70 foot
standard with six luminaries on each bar.
Mr. Leslie, consulting engineer for the
lighting, stated that the luminaries are about
20 inches in diameter and each weights about
100 pounds.
Mayor Mertensotto expressed concern about pole
strength and asked if they were designed by an
engineer.
Mr. Leslie responded that they are all
assembled and certified by the manufacturer
and that they will have an anchor bolt
assembly into the ground.
3941
3942
Mayor Mertensotto asked if there is
manufacturer's recommendation on soi s.
Mr. Leslie responded that the Academ has
retained Braun Testing to perform so'1 testing
and the firm is preparing a recommen ation,
and the light standards will be inst lled in
accordance with their design specifi ations.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the el vation
drawings indicate that there is litt e
question that the light standards wi 1 be seen
from homes on Wagon Wheel Trail.
Mr. Leslie responded that because of
height of the school and its locatio
of a hill, the houses on the east si
lake will not see the standards and
see the St. Thomas facility itself.
that the Academy can plant more tree
shield the facility from the homes o
side of the lake. He further stated
lighting becomes offensive, baffles
added to the lights.
Mr. Turpening stated that the footba
is at elevation 884 and the front of
building at St. Thomas is at elevati
The height of the building from that
the driveway is an additional 30 fee
950 foot elevation at the top of the
He stated that even with 70 foot lig
standards, that puts the top of the
at a 954 foot elevation. He further
that the drawings show that because
depression of the field, the top of
standards would only be about 4 feet
St. Thomas building and the lights a
the top of the standards.
Mr. Zahr reviewed parking facts and
topographic drawings of the school �
describing existing parking at St. '
Visitation, which shares parking fo.
events. He explained that Visitati�
tenant of the St. Thomas athletic f
Mr. Zahr stated that there are 521
spaces on the two campuses. He inf�
Council that the school has a gentl
agreement with IOS to allow parking
when needed and that Mend-Eagan use
for parking for its games. He info.
Council that the IOS property has b
and St. Thomas will contact the new
the
on top
e of the
ill only
He stated
to
the west
that if
an be
1 field
the main
�n 920.
point in
, or a
building.
t
tandards
tated
f the
above the
e below
ounds,
omas and
special
is a co-
ilities.
tablished
med
en's
n its lot
the lot
ed
n sold
wners
3942
3943
when the facility changes hands in April. He
reviewed other areas which can accommodate
parking and which could be improved for
parking if needed. He reviewed attendance
figures for the last three years, which
averaged 969 s, and informed Council that
the largest single game crowd was 1348. He
stated that he does not think that the
improved facility will bring an increased
level of traffic into the neighborhood and
stated that over 1200 people on site every day
including students, faculty and visitors
without any parking problems.
Mr. Zahr stated that there will be about 12 to
14 regularly scheduled night events each fall,
with games starting at 7:00 p.m. He stated
that all but four of the events will be
attended by less than 100 people and he did
not anticipate any change in the pattern of
traffic than now exists. He stated that St.
Thomas has instructed other teams to enter the
Academy site from Lake Drive and that city
police officers will be hired to help with
traffic control for large events.
Mayor Mertensotto asked if St. Thomas would be
willing to stipulate as a condition of a
conditional use permit that the facility will
not become a lease facility for other schools,
etc., so that the field does not get used
three or four nights a week.
Mr. Zahr responded that the Academy would like
to be very protective of its fields and has no
intention to lease the complex out. He stated
that if there were a special night when Mend-
Eagan were to want to schedule a special
championship game the Academy would let them
use the facility.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the city would
need to have an agreement that the school
would not lease out the facility and that this
should be specified in the conditional use
permit. He asked if the school would be
willing to barricade Lake Drive where it turns
at the lake so that it cannot be used.
Mr. Zahr stated that St. Thomas could use
barricades for the four varsity games, which
are the only games when he would anticipate
more than 100 people, and that the police
3943
officers could)
Heights Road.
3944
also direct traffic t� Mendota
Mayor Mertensotto asked for question
comments from the audience.
Mr. Greving st�ted that the upgradin
improvements will provide the St. Th
students with an improved educationa
and that much work and thought has g
the long range�,planning. He further
that he hopes the St. Thomas represe
have conveyed to Council that St. Th
forward to working with the city to
first-rate facility.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the P1
Commission hea"rd the application for
conditional use permit and unanimous
recommended its approval subject to
conditions: proof of parking, instal
diffusers on all light standards and
of an opinion from the City Attorney
stadium would be allowed as a condit
in the R-1 district. He further sta
he has suggested that consideration
given to amending the Zoning Ordinan
provide for a stadium as a condition
with the conditions stated in the Ma
from Assistant�'Batchelder. He expla
Council could direct staff to advert
hearing on the�ordinance amendment b
Planning Commission in March, and in
inter°im Council could table the matt
its first meeting in April. He stat
with respect to the Commission's con
lighting, it is the understanding th
diffusers would be added to the ligh
correct any problems which may arise
pointed out that the St. Thomas
representative;s have indicated that
the intent to lease out the facilitv
Councilmember �Krebsbach asked if the
one entrance ctate to the stadium.
Mr. Greving re�sponded that there a
entrances, one�for spectators and
emergency vehifcles.
CouncilmemberfKrebsbach asked about
on the Visitattion Monastery in term
vis�ting teams�which may not be awa
Monaste'ry. Sh� noted that one of t
�i,
and
� and
�mas
program
�ne into
stated
.tatives
�mas looks
�uild a
nning
Y
ation of
receipt
that a
onal use
ed that
hould be
e to
1 use
ch 3 memo
ned that
se for a
the
the
r until
d that
ition on
t
s to
and
t is not
is only
two
ther for
he impact
of
of the
3944
3945
alternative parking sites is at Visitation.
She also asked about parking on Mendota
Heights Road and about concession activity.
Mr. Greving responded that the Visitation
parking would not be advertised and that it
would be used by the St. Thomas students and
parents. People would walk around the fine
arts center and along Lake Drive. With
respect to Mendota Heights Road, he stated
that if people park on Mendota Heights Road,
they could walk from the road to the path
leading to the entrance gate. He stated that
the Academy is considering allowing a firm to
use a mobile unit in the open area behind the
stadium for concessions.
Councilmember Krebsbach informed Mr. Greving
that any signage on the press box would have
� to be approved. She asked if lighting will be
sufficient for football games and if there
will be lights for pedestrians.
Mr. Greving responded that no consideration
has been given to signage on the press box at
this time. With respect to lighting, he
stated that if diffusers were required on all
of the lights, it would create a black hole,
and the way lighting is currently proposed -
putting up standards and using the lighting in
the most efficient manner and diffusing
individual lights in response to complaints -
is best. He stated that there are no lights
on Lake Drive because it is a residential
street, and further stated that it is not
likely that the flow of traffic will be into
the neighborhood.
Mayor Mertensotto asked about fencing and
volume controls for the public address system.
Mr. Greving responded that there will be six
foot high fencing close to the perimeter of
the field and that the P.A. system volume will
be less that the airplane noise.
Councilmember Smith stated }'��-�-�_� �-g�rd
it is highly unlikely
that St. Thomas will need 'ng
anra- �cv �- •��t - � �- -� �^^�Ar7 t0 build a
•--.--�— lr r u r
stadium that would accommodate so many more
people.
3945
Mr. Greving responded that state cod
22 inches of width per person for bl
He stated that people from one team
on one side of the bleachers and the
team will sit on the other side, and
will be set apart. He stated that a
the facility may never be filled to
it will provide sufficient room for
to be comfortable and for�home and o
teams to sit on opposite sides.
Councilmember Smith asked if the Ac
plans for tennis court replacement.
3946
requires
achers.
ill sit
other
the bands
though
apacity,
veryone
posing
has
Mr. Greving responded that the exist'ng court
was not in ideal site and there are ther
sites on campus where it can be relo ated.
Councilmember Huber stated that he d es not
see anything in the wording of the p oposed
ordinance amendment (March 3 memo fr m
Administrative Assistant) that would change or
restrict St. Thomas from doing what hey are
proposing.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Counci
have to make a ruling that the propo
athletic complex rather than an athl
stadium, which is only allowed by or
B-3 Districts.- He felt that in orde
any zoning problems a decision shoul
delayed until after consideration ha
given to amending the ordinance.
Councilmember Huber asked what it i
proposal that makes it a stadium wh
Thomas has been using for many year
allowed. He stated that the existi
facility and bleachers have been us
years, that the city has allowed th
asked how the proposal is anything
improvements to the existing facili
Mayor Mertensotto responded that is
that the city could be challenged a
outside of the Zoning Ordinance bec
proposal has been referred to as a
Mr. Greving responded that when St.
started planning the project last f
with the hope that the project coul
completed before the 1994 football
which requires that the field be co
August 15. He explained that in or
would
al is an
t].0
1riariC2 lri
to avoid
be
been
about the
what St.
has been
athletic
for
use. He
her than
ossible
being
se the
adium.
1 it was
be
ason,
leted by
r to meet
3946
3947
that date for the grandstand and track
improvement, engineering, grading, asphalt
installation etc. must be completed, and in
order to accomplish those items the project
must start by March 3. He stated that there
are over 1000 individual pieces that must be
made for the grandstand plus the fabrication
of the seats, and it takes eight to twelve
weeks to design and fabricate the individual
pieces. He stated that a commitment cannot be
made to making the fabrication forms until
city approval is received and that if 30 days
is lost waiting for an ordinance amendment,
the August 15 date cannot be met.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he has received
calls expressing various concerns about the
facility and some objections to it. He noted
that no one has objected this evening and it
would appear that Council could work out the
conditions, but a building permit cannot be
issued until the project is approved. He
pointed out that construction cannot begin
until the frost is gone.
Councilmember Huber stated that he can
appreciate Council may wish to consider making
a change in the zoning ordinance in order to
protect homes surrounding a facility elsewhere
but that this does not appear to be an issue
in the St. Thomas proposal. He felt that the
proposal falls within the ordinance and
pointed out that the city has already allowed
bleachers to be put up. He asked why St.
Thomas should be held hostage for something
that might be an issue elsewhere in the city
but not at the St. Thomas campus.
Acting City Attorney Evan Coobs informed
Council that he has researched what a stadium
is and that it is not defined in case law or
any zoning code. He stated that the
dictionary defines a stadium as a large,
unroofed building. Responding to
Councilmember Huber's comments, he stated that
he also is not sure where the line should be
drawn.
Councilmember Huber stated that if there were
no existing facility on the campus he might
agree about an ordinance amendment but St.
Thomas is simply improving an existing
faaility.
3947
Councilmember Smith stated that Coun
dealing with R-1 zoning and a facili
unique at this point. She stated th
site where such a facility could adv
affect people it could be very detri
and while she felt that the proposed
is very suitable for the St. Thomas
Council must be consistent.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he did
that money should be spent on direct
City Attorney to determine whether t
proposal is an athletic facility or
and whether it can be allowed in an
District. He stated that he would r
through the process of amending the
ordinance, and that he cannot believ
Thomas would be hurt by a 30 day del
must have approval this evening.
Mr. Greving responded that it is no
necessarily the construction but th
commitment to the factory that buil
seating that is a problem. He furt.
that the St. Thomas representatives
studied the code and since the exis
structure serves as an accessory us
school, the proposed improvement is
a use that is accessory to the prim
facility. He stated that if action
taken this evening, the school coul
in a precarious position. He asked
if an ordinance amendment failed, S
would have the right to interpretat
the existing ordinance.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that Co
follow statutory procedures and one
is that if there is a petition for
Ordinance amendment a public hearin
conducted. He stated that the Plan
Commission could recommend not to c
ordinance but Council is not bound
recommendation. He explained that
ordinance amendment would be the on
before the Commission.
Mr. Greving responded that St. Thom�
concur with Councilmember Huber's
interpretation of the ordinance and
the school has existed since 1965.
out that the school would basically
upgrading and improving the existin�
for its athletic program.
3948
�il is
y is
.t at a
rsely
�ental ,
facility
�ampus ,
not feel
na the
tadium
-1
ther go
oning
St.
v and
the
r stated
ave
ng
f or the
pgrading
s not
be left
�hether,
Thomas
�n under
.cil must
�f those
Zoning
must be
ng
nge the
� that
y issue
s would
the way
He pointed
be
facility
3948
3949
Mayor Mertensotto was concerned about the
possibility of setting precedent.
Planning Commission Vice Chair Ultan Duggan
stated that in the past the city has approved
applications with contingencies. He stated
that the Commission has recommended approval
of the application with conditions and asked
what the ramifications of a negative decision
by the city on an ordinance amendment would be
on St. Thomas.
°Mayor Mertensotto responded that the
commission is advisory to the Council and that
Council, independent of a recommendation of
the commission, could proceed to affect a
change in the ordinance.
Mr. Duggan stated that part of the
recommendation from the commission was a
ruling from the City Attorney on its request
to determine whether the proposal is for an
improved grandstand or a stadium.
Councilmember Smith responded that the
condition was that the City Attorney give an
opinion that the proposal is not a stadium.
She stated that the commission also stated
that if the facility is a stadium, St. Thomas
must come back before the commission for
rezoning and conditional use permit, but that
Council is proposing something simpler.
Mr. Duggan stated that there have been
occasions where Council has permitted
development to occur prior to needed action,
and suggested that, in view of the St. Thomas
time constraint, permission could be given
contingent on the Planning Commission making a
recommendation.
Mayor Mertensotto e�lained that Council would
be asking the commission to make a decision on
whether a stadium should be a permitted
conditional use, and if a positive
recommendation is made he believes it would be
well received by Council.
Mr. Duggan stated that he has been on the
commission for eight years and has often seen
where plans have gone forward contingent on
meeting certain standards. He asked why this
can�ot be done this evening.
3949
�
Councilmember Huber stated that in
Thomas was approved for constructio
the city has recently spent several
of thousands of dollars on an athle
at Sibley. He stated that there is
similarity between the facilities a
in R-1 districts.
Mr. Dick Spicer, representing Mend-
stated that the association strongl
the request, and uses the St. Thoma
facilities from May to August. He
whether Council's concern is over p
and pointed out that St. Thomas has
the standards for the conditions of
proposed amendment. He asked what
would be set, since St. Thomas meet
the standards. He stated that the
has indicated that what is proposed
upgrade, and that only Planning Com
Friel has suggested that it is some
different. He did not see that a n
precedent could possibly be set and
he realizes that Sibley may some ti
before Council for lighting a field
exactly what almost every school in
Paul Suburban Conference has.
3950
64 St.
and that
undreds
c complex
both are
��..,
supports
ked
cedent,
et all of
recedent
all of
ity staff
is an
issioner
hing
gative
that while
e come
this is
the St.
Councilmember Huber stated that the precedent
has already been established when t e city let
St. Thomas put a football stadium o its
property in the early 1960's.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated thatlshe does
not want to lose sight of the fact
Council would like to have the faci
city and if Council is divided over
and a decision must be delayed for
an ordinance amendment, she would h
Council will continue to support th
She stated that she does not think
any fear of Sibley doing the same t
pointed out that there are residenc
Sibley.
Mr. Spicer stated that Sibley does �
the tests set forth in the amendmen�
not build under the ordinance amendi
there is concern over the School Fo:
He stated that the concern is the d:
the stadium from Visitation and the
of 1,000 feet should not be a probl�
hat
ity in the
procedure
pproval of
pe that
project.
here is
ing but
s around
ot meet
and could
ent, but
est site.
stance of
condition
3950
3951
Councilmember Koch stated that she sees no
problem in granting approval to St. Thomas
this evening. She further stated that she
cannot see the rationale in delaying action,
nor that Council would be held hostage by
another applicant because of approval granted
to St. Thomas. She suggested that an
ordinance amendment could be considered at
some future time.
A member of
would be of
right after
whether the
challenged.
the Council asked what the affect
changing the zoning ordinance
making a ruling on St. Thomas, and
amendment action could be easily
Attorney Coobs responded that there is always
the risk that people will wonder if the
amendment is special legislation to favor one
party. He stated that Council must decide
whether someone would argue that what is
proposed is not an accessory use incidental to
the use of the property as a school. He
explained that he could not find any hard
evidence on either side of the stadium issue
and did not know how anyone could make a hard
case against the project.
A member of the audience asked whether
Attorney Coobs had researched the standard of
review that Council has a rational basis for
approval. He stated that there is a
reasonable basis in deciding in favor of the
application.
Attorney Coobs stated that he believes there
is a reasonable basis for approval and that
under the conditional use process Council has
to review the unique characteristics of the
proposal.
Councilmember Smith asked if Council decides
that this is an accessory structure, should it
be an accessory structure for everyone.
Attorney Coobs responded that could be
deciding that an athletic field would be an
accessory structure.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Council must
treat all applicants the same and that St.
Thomas should not be treated differently. He
fur�her stated that a conditional use permit
3951
is not normally processed as quickl
has been.
Councilmember Kresbach asked a serie
questions of Mr. Greving regarding t
comprehensive improvement plans for
Thomas. In response to a question z
parking, Mr. Greving stated St. Thon
build additional parking if parking
problem at Vistiation. In response
question regarding landscaping, Mr.
noted that St. Thomas intends to im�
landscape plan presented as part of
facility update. In response to a c
regarding neighborhood concerns, Mr.
reiterated St. Thomas' intent to hiz
police officers as needed to control
crowd/traffic on game nights. Counc
Krebsbach stated that she does not t
are any further concerns or question
stated that the St. Thomas represent
made a well prepared presentation an
answered all questions.
Mr. Greving stated that he senses t;
of Council and understands that the
has raised problems which exist in
code but that St. Thomas has met al
standards of the code. He suggeste�
perhaps at a later date Council may
review the code as it pertains to s
accessory structures but all St. Th�
is that the current ordinance be ap�
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Counc
follow procedure and there have bee
raised on whether the facility is p
He stated that Council wants to pro
city by knowing that what is propos
done in an R-1 district. He furthe
that St. Thomas has met all conditi
requirements but has one loop hole.
that if the project must start in M
application process should have beg
Councilmember Huber stated that wha
proposed is reasonable under existi
ordinance language and he did not t
approval would set a negative prece
stated that he is sure that the cit
allowed things to be done in the pa
later amended ordinances to strencrt
3952
as this
of
t.
garding
s would
ecame a
o a
ement the
heir
estion
Greving
off-duty
lmember
ink there
. She
tives
have
support
roposal
e current
of the
that
ave to
diums or
as asks
ied.
should
questions
missible.
ct the
can be
stated
s and
He felt
ch, the
earlier.
is
ent. He
has
t and then
en them.
3952
3953
Administrator Lawell suggested that if timing
is an issue, a hearing notice could be
published on the weekend and the Planning
Commission and Council could hold special
meetings on the matter to minimize the delay.
He stated that, because of publication notice
requirements, the earliest the Planning
Commission could a hearing would be March 17.
Councilmember Huber stated that the only
problem he has is that there are neighbors
near other schools who may well want to have
input on how the ordinance should be amended.
He further stated that he would not want to
rush an amendment through where other
neighbors would want to have input on how
close a facility and lighting could be to a
residential neighborhood. He felt that what
is unique about St. Thomas is that the
athletic facility is a good distance from any
residential community, whereas there are homes
much closer than 1,000 feet from Sibley. He
felt that Council would err in two ways - by
delaying St. Thomas and by rushing a decision
on an amendment.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that she does
not want the matter to become overly
complicated and pointed out that Sibley is a
different issue.
Councilmember Smith asked whether there would
be cause for challenge if the application were
approved and then the ordinance was changed.
Attorney Coobs responded that anything Council
does prior to amending an ordinance would be
grandfathered in under subsequent law. He
further stated that if Council approves the
application this evening and then considers an
amendment, the St. Thomas facility would be
grandfathered and would not set a precedent.
Mr. Spicer stated that what was done by the
city with respect to the Sibley complex was
more of a precedent when a building was taken
down and a new structure was constructed,
whereas in the case of St. Thomas, an athletic
facility clearly already exists.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that an
ordinance amendment could become a very
cotr�plicated issue because of Sibley. She
further stated that St. Thomas has met the
3953
conditions and has received the appr
recommendation from the Planning Com
She stated that if she were not conf
all of the Council's concerns had be
would not support the project.
3954
ing
ssion.
ent that
met she�
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that C uncil
must make a finding that what is pro osed is
an accessory use (structure) and not a
stadium.
Council made the following findings:
the proposed project by St. Thomas A
an upgrade of its existing athletic
and falls within the definition of a
accessory structure and is appropria
classified as an accessory structure
could be authorized as a conditional
existing zoning; and 2) that the pro
part of a larger plan which includes
landscaping; and 3) that the topogra
distance from surrounding residentia
will be sufficient not to interfere
people's enjoyment of their own prop
The following conditions were stipul
that St. Thomas Academy will not lea
facility for use by an outside agenc
prior approval of the City Council;
that in lieu of the required number
spaces, if parking becomes a problem
for Visitation or neighbors, that St
will construct another parking lot t
accommodate parking needs; and 3) th
duty police officers will be retaine
necessary for evening events and bar
will be placed on Lake Drive during
football games; and 4) that issuance
building permit is subject to review
approval of plans by the city's Code
Enforcement Officer and Fire Marshal
that the project is part of an impro
plan at the St. Thomas campus that w
include the landscaping plan present
Council; and 6) that concessions wil
provided by a leased mobile unit and
such time as a permanent structure i
St. Thomas will make application and
before the Planning Commission and C
Council; and 7) that St. Thomas agre
diffuse, baffle or screen any offendl
lights, at the discretion of the Cit�
That any future requests for signage
subject to City Council approval; an
the light standard and attachments n,
1) that
ademy is
acility
ely
which
use under
ect is
hy and
areas
ith
ted: 1)
e the
without
nd 2)
f parking
either
Thomas
t off-
as
icades
arsity
of a
and
and 5 )
ement
uld also
d to City
be
that at
desired,
appear
ty
to
ng
; and 8)
will be
9 ) that
t exceed
3954
seventy feet (70') in height; and
number of games to be held in the
with the use of lights be limited
per year.
3955
10) that the
facility
to 15 games
Councilmember Huber moved to grant a
conditional use permit and height variances
for light standards and press box/control room
to St. Thomas Academy with the findings and
conditions as set forth by Council, and to
direct staff to prepare a resolution setting
forth those findings and conditions.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that his only concern
is that he has received an objection to the
facility after word got out that the Planning
Commission discussed that stadiums are only
allowed in B-3 districts.
Councilmember Krebsbach responded that the
advice of the city's attorney is that if an
ordinance amendment is adopted to make a
stadium a permitted use in an R-1 district,
the St. Thomas facility would be
grandfathered.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the only
potential problem might be that Council would
be exceeding its authority. Councilmember
Krebsbach asked attorney Coobs if the City
would be exceeding its authority.
Attorney Coobs stated that the issues raised
this evening have not been frivolous. He
pointed out that stadium is not defined by
statute, and further that he is not saying
that Council is exceeding its authority. He
stated that there is always the possibility
that someone will challenge an action by
Council.
Councilmember Smith asked, if there were a
ruling that Council exceeded its authority,
could adoption of an ordinance amendment
making the change solve the problem.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he feels that
amending the ordinance would be an admission
that Council did not have the authority to
approve the application. He stated that he is
aware that a challenge has been directed to
him.
3955
�
VOTE ON THE MOTION:
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
RECESS
Mr. Greving stated that St. Thomas
unique situation - according to the
ordinance the proposal is an access
structure well within the education
of the Academy. He felt that if Co
defines what St. Thomas proposes to
accessory use, there should be no p.
particularly since the structure, t:
bleachers and the field are already
existence. The project is an impro�
felt that the issue is semantics an�
of the work stadium.
Mayor Mertensotto
the project since
will be at least
3956
in a
isting
program
il
as an
lem,
ment. He
the use
stated that he will support
it is obvious that there
three approving vot s.
Mayor Mertensotto called a recess at�10:14
p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 0:20 p.m.
SENIOR HOUSING Council acknowledged a memo from
Administrative Assistant Batchelder
senior citizen housing site selectio
with excerpts from Planning Commissi
minutes, a report from the City Plan
maps showing the seven sites conside
Planning Commission. Council also
acknowledged a copy of the D ot Co
site selection criteria and a le ter
Agency's Deputy Director, K r�� 11.
Ms. Gill, present for the discussion
brief overview of the senior housing
development program, informing the a
that Mendota Heights has set aside C
Development Block Grant funds in 199
and 1994 for acquisition of a site f
� housing. She explained that a study
by the HRA has determined that there
for housing for senior citizens who
reside in the city and parents of re
the community. Ms. Gill explained t
of the HRA program and showed pictur
facilities which have been construct
the program in several Dakota County
communities. She explained that the
are financed by the HR.A through the
of bonds.
garding
along
meeting
r, and
d by the
nty HR.A
from the
gave a
dience
mmunity
, 1993
r senior
conducted
is a need
urrently
idents of
e goals
s of the
d through
buildings
ssuance
3956
3957
Mayor Mertensotto asked about the timing of
the Mendota Heights program, and when the city
would need to finance a site. Ms. Gill
responded that site selection should be
completed in 1994, with construction of a
facility occurring in 1995. She stated that
the city should select two or three sites, and
prioritize them if desired, and then the HRA
would begin contacting property owners and
assessing the sites.
Councilmember Smith asked where senior housing
sites are typically located and what criteria
the HRA looks for.
Ms. Gill responded that there are several
criteria, such as transportation and access to
shopping areas which are key criteria, but
that usually not all of the criteria can be
met.
Councilmember Huber asked if the facilities
are designed for seniors who need care.
Ms. Gill responded that the facilities the HRA
builds under the program are for individuals
who are able to live independently although
some of the residents contract for nursing
services on their own. She stated that
normally one nice community space is developed
on the main floor of the buildings and smaller
lobbies are designed on each floor. She
explained that the residents are encouraged to
have different functions i the community room,
which includes kitchen facilities. Responding
to a question on eligibility criteria, she
stated that the purpose of the program is to
provide affordable housing and reviewed the
annual income levels which cannot be exceeded.
She stated that all of the units are rental
units.
Councilmember Krebsbach asked if individuals
can reserve a unit.
Ms. Gill responded that when a new building is
opened, the HRA accepts applications through a
given date and then does a random drawing,
giving preference to Dakota County residents.
Councilmember Smith asked how many Mendota
Heights residents are on the waiting list.
3957
�
Ms. Gill responded that the informa
readily available but that she will
research and provide the informatio
Council.
3958
:ion is not
do
� to the
Councilmember Huber asked if the re idents are
required to reside in the units for a minimum
number of months during a year.
Ms. Gill responded that she would h ve to
check with the property management taff but
that to her knowledge there are no esidents
who only live in the facilities for a few
months each year.
Councilmember Smith stated that she
the city was on a track to find a s
1998. She asked what has prompted
accelerating the schedule and how t
affect financing for the site.
Ms. Gill responded that the schedul
changed because of information cont
the agency's study update in 1993 a
other HR.A developments have been co
faster than anticipated, which free
agency's financing capacity. She s
the HRA may need to add some other
acquisition of the site, possibly u
of its senior housing development f
explained that the HRA receives abo
mil from the county to reduce the d
bonds and that it may be possible t
as a funding source.
believes
te in
is will
was
ned in
i. because
�leted
up the
.ted that
nds f or
ng some
.ds . She
1/3 of a
t on
use this
Administrator Lawell stated that the city's
CDBG funding dedicated to the senior housing
site through 1994 will total $150,00 .
There was brief discussion over the otential
costs for a site and the ability of he city
to use eminent domain proceedings if
necessary.
Mayor Mertensotto thanked Ms. Gill f r her
presentation, informing her that the matter
will be placed on a Council agenda i the near
future for discussion of the sites r commended
by the Planning Commission and for
prioritizing of the sites.
IVY FALLS CREEK Council acknowledged a memo and tabu ation of
bids received for construction of th Ivy
Falls Creek restoration project. Ma or
3958
3959
Mertensotto briefly reviewed the bids for the
audience.
Public Works Director Danielson stated that
the engineer's estimate for the construction
was $650,000, and the bids were well within
the estimate. He informed Council that the
low bidder, C.S. McCrossan, constructed the
Phase I creek improvements, did a good job on
that project and is familiar with the area.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Council had
reserved awarding of the bids for 90 days
because it wanted to have all easement
acquisitions completed before an award. He
pointed out that all but one of the easements
have been signed.
Public Works Director Danielson responded that
the final easement, over the Miller property,
will come before the court on March 26, and
under quick take proceedings, the contractor
will have the right to enter the property
early in April. He stated that the project
can be started in advance of getting the
easement and that the contractor would like to
begin in early April.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that all bid bonds
except those from the three lowest bidders
should be returned after the award and those
of the second and third lowest bidders should
be retained for return after a contract has
been executed by the low bidder. He stated
that the easement acquisition process is far
enough along that the city can risk going
ahead with the project without jeopardizing
project costs.
Public Works Director Danielson responded that
the Millers have reaffirmed that they are in
favor of the project but dispute the easement
acquisition price.
Councilmember Koch moved adoption of
Resolution No. 94-18, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
BIDS AND AWARDING CONTR.ACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
IVY FALLS CREEK RESTOR.ATION IMPROVEMENTS
(IMPROVEMENT NO. 91, PROJECT NO. 6)," awarding
the contract to the low bidder, C.S. McCrossan
Construction, Inc., for its low bid of
$556,402 and to authorize the immediate return
of ,the bid security to all but the three
lowest bidders and return of the bid security
3959
to the second and third lowest bi
execution of the contract by C.S.
Councilmember Huber seconded the
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
RADIO TOWER Council acknowledged a memo from th
CONSULTANTS Administrator regarding retention o
consultants to assist in evaluating
radio tower application. Council a
acknowledged a copy of a letter froi
Nystrom, the city's legal counsel i:
matter, to Ms. Pentel's counsel, Jo:
and letters, resumes and fee schedu
Mr. John DuBois and Mr. Geoffrey Ji
was recommended that Mr. DuBois, a:
Professional Communications Consult
Engineer, be retained to assist in ;
radio performance and radio interfe:
issues and that Mr. Jillson, a civi:
structural engineer, be retained to
analyzing structural engineering an�
safety issues.
Administrator Lawell stated that th
schedules are based on hourly rates
amount of time spent on the project
Council chooses, it can set a cap o
costs. He felt that the work can b
$5,000, $2,500 per consultant.
Mayor Mertensotto suggested a $2,50
each consultant and that they shoul
the application and the Court of Ap
ruling and present written options
Responding to a question from the a
Mayor Mertensotto stated that one o
consultants is a structural enginee
analyzes structures and towers for
purposes and the other analyzes rad
performance and radio communication
3960
;rs after
�Crossan.
ion.
City
the Pentel
so
Eric
the
n Bellows,
es f rom
lson. It
eaistered
nalyzing
ence
and
assist in
tower
fee
times the
and if
the
done for
cap for
review
eals
o Council.
dience,
the
who
afety
issues.
A neighbor of Ms. Pentel informed C uncil that
Ms. Pentel has stated that she plan to take
some of her trees down. The neighb r felt
that perhaps Ms. Pentel's existing quipment
will have better reception after th trees are
down.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Counc'1 will ask
the consultants to address the ques ion. He
briefly reviewed the history of the Pentel
application and the court decisions.
3960
3961
The neighbor stated that radio operation is a
hobby for Ms. Pentel and that her income does
not depend on the antennas. She stated that
Ms. Pentel originally erected two antennas on
her home without approval and then came to the
city to request a larger one. She informed
Council that the neighbors are concerned over
safety. She stated that the city's height
ordinance is in place for a reason and that
nothing in the neighborhood has changed that
would require the ordinance to change. She
pointed out that the neighborhood has greatly
improved in the past six years and th
allowing the tower in the Pent cc yard
will affect many homes.
Councilmember Smith stated th t
federal law takes precedence n
trying to address the neighbor
but that the problem is that alt
����e the case in lower court, Ms.
appeal. She stated that Council
hiring the consultants is better
action than pursuing the matter
Court.
�7�,�;�.-�
d Council s
ood conc rns
3��g�he city
Pentel won on
feels that
course of
to the Supreme
Mrs. Elizabeth Plummer expressed concern over
the size of the proposed antenna versus the
size of the lot. She stated that there are
other structures on the lot and also suggested
that NSP should be contacted because of its
power lines. She was concerned about whether
the neighbors would have to try to find Ms.
Pentel during a storm, as an example, i the
antenna is extended and Ms. Pentel i ot
home. � �
Mayor Mertensotto responded that Cou c/il ould
impose the condition that someone mu t� o the
premises when the antenna is extended d that
the tower can only be extended when it is in
operation.
Councilmember Krebsbach asked whether there
should be a go/no-go point on the consultant
work - perhaps $1,000 - to determine that the
services of each of the consultants is what
the city wants.
Administrator Lawell responded that it would
be better to pick a stage in the process
becyause he is not certain how much time would
be needed to perform each of the tasks in the
3961
e
3962
process. He explained that he can uggest to
the consultants the number of hours the city
thinks are needed to do each of the tasks.
Councilmember Huber moved to author'�ze staff
to retain the services of Mr. John . DuBois
and Mr. Geoffrey G. Jillson as prof ssional
experts to assist in the analysis o the
Pentel antenna request in accordanc with the
terms and conditions set forth in t eir
respective fee schedules, to a maxi um of
$2,500 per consultant, the cap to b subject
to reconsideration if necessary.
Councilmember Smith seconded the mo ion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Administrator Lawell stated that he will
prepare a memo of agreement encompa sing the
work plan and timeline:
JOINT WORKSHOP Council acknowledged a memo from Ad inistrator
Lawell regarding the scheduling of joint
workshop of the Council and Plannin
Commission for discussion of the ci y's long-
term comprehensive land use plannin goals
along the T.H. 55 corridor.
It was the consensus to notify the lanning
Commission of a preferred date of T esday,
March 29.
ADJOURN There being no further business to ome before
the Council, Councilmember Huber mo ed that
the meeting be adjourned.
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
TIME OF' ADJOURNMENT: 11:43 o'clock .M.
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
3962
CITY OF �:PTDOTi� HEIGHTS
TREASIIRER'S REPORT, FSBRIIARY, 1994
h �x's
DAROTA CCIINTY STATE BANK
Checking Account 1.05�
Savings Account 2.15g
C.D. Rep. 2.40�
Collateral - Bonds
Gov't. Guar.
CHEROKE$ STAT$ BANR
C.D. due 5/31/94 ��2.75�
Saving Cert. 8/22/94 r� 2.50�
Collateral - Bonds
Gov't. Guar.
$ 17,423.86
$ 569.09
0.00
$ 17,992.95
$ 500,000.00
$ 100,000.00
$ 350,000.00
S 13.952.59
$ 363,952.59
$ 500,000.00
$ 100,000.00
FHLMC 7.23� 12/97 FBS $ 500,008.00
FNMA 6.3� 12/97-95 FBS $ 500,008.00
GNMA Mtg. Pool 9� (PRU) $ 154,662.75
FHL Mtg. Pool Sg (PRU) $ 149,356.63
b'Na,C 7� Mtg. Pool (PRU) PAC $ 265, 974 .40
FNII�C 6 1/4� Mtg Pool (PRU) $ 465, 962 .14
FNMA 6� Pool (PRU) $ 506,808.50
FIiLMC 6� Pool C� 101.4375 (PRU) $ 303, 978.42
FNMA (1994 Pool) 6 1/2� (PRU) $ 305,100.60
U.S. Treasury Money NDct (FBS) $ 800,143.48
Gov't. Securities Fund $1,002,470.00
Zero Cpn T.Bds 7.9� -
2011(J&M) $ 197,530.00
TOTAL FIINDS AVAILABL}3: $5,890,284.93
Funds Available 12/31/93 $6,886,428.58
Funds Available 2/28/93 $7,287,736.07
Rgte� MoneY
Feb 28 Bank
Fid
;
Escrow,Funds (American National Bank) 2/28/94
City Hall Buildings $ 16,561.00
LES:kkb
�
�?,000.00
$ 60Q,000.00
Value 2-28-9�4 (est. )
$
rke
2.40�
3.00g
52
51
17
27
50
47
49
30
30
1,49
2,06
,000.00
,000.00
,000.00
,000.00
,020.00
,000.00
,250.00
,000.00
,750.00
,000.00
,000.00
20�,000.00
L
t. ;
CITY OF I�NDOTA HFIGHTS
, �a�,_ •.
1Karch 10, 199
To: Mayor, City Council and City
From:
Subj ect :
Administ t
�
Revin Batchelder, Administrative Assis a
Proposed Resolution Supporting the City of Eagan�
Application for Trail Funding
DISCiTSSION
On April 6, 1993, City Council approved Resolution No
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING EFFORTS OF THE CITY OF EAGAN TO
TR.AILWAY CONNECTIONS INTO THF3 MINNESOTA RIVER VALLFY TRAILS
At the time, city staff was working with a loose organiz<
cities titled "Partnerships in Trail Connections" to co�
trail connections on both sides of the Minnesota and Mis�
River. All of the involved communities were supporti
other's grant requests.
s ISTRA
93-21,
SYSTEM.
tion of
issippi
iq each
The City of Eagan�s proposal was to develop t ailways
connecting their City system in �the Cedarvale area w th the
Minnesota River Valley and the Fort Snelling State Park This
would loop the trail system with Mendota Heights' connec ions to
these same systems.
The ISTEA grants are quite competitive with many cities
competing for the availa.ble grants and Eagan was not su cessful
last year. They are making the same request this year nd have
asked their neighboring cities, Burnsville and Mendota Hei hts, to
support their request for ISTEA money.
RECOM�2ENDATION
The Parks and Recreation Commission voted unanimo
recommend that City Council approve a resolution endorsing
of Eagan's request for ISTEA grant money to construc
connections to the Minnesota River Valley.
AGTION RE4IIIRED
If the City Council so desires, they should pass
adopting Resolution No. 94- , A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING :
THE CITY OF EAGAN TO DEVELOP TRAILWAY CONNECTIONS
MINNESOTA RIVER VALLEY SYSTEM.
ly to
a City
trail
motion
IRTS OF
'0 THE
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COIINTY, MINNE50TA
RESOLIITION NO. 93- 21
A RESOLIITION SIIPPORTING FsFFORTS OF TSP CITY OF EAGAN TO DEVELOP
TRAILWAY CONNECTIONS INTO THE MINNLSOTA RIVER VALLEY TR.AILS SYSTEM
WSEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Dakota
County and the Cities of Minneapolis, St. Paul, Mendota Heights,
Bloomington and Eagan have established an informal coalition to
jointly pursue the coordinated development of trail connections and
linkages through the Minnesota River Valley; and
WHEREAS, this network of trails will offer the public enhanced
opportunities for trail related recreation including bicycling,
raalking, jogging, nature enjoyment, and other recreation pursuits
in and around the Minnesota and Misaissippi River Valleys; and
WHEREAS, an integrated system of trails will provide citizens
with new opportunities to gain direct pedestrian access to
significant points of destination in adjoining communities,
including the Mall of America, Fort Snelling State Park, Minnehaha
Park, Hidden Falls/Crosby Farm Park, Lilydale/Harriet Island Park,
Lebanon Hills Regional Park, and the Minnesota Zoo; and
WHEREAS, the completion of key trail linkages will afford
local commuters with alternative modea of pedestrian tranaportation
to and from major employers within the Minnesota River Valley area
including the Minneapolis/St. Paul Intemational Airport, Veteran's
Hospital, Ford Motor Company, Mall of America, Blue Cross/Blue
Shield Corporation and Northwest Airlines, to name a few; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has placed its highest priority on
trails connections into the Minnesota River Valley thereby
promotion the inter-agency trails network concept; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has applied for matching federal
ISTEA funds to construct such trails.
NOW THEREFORE BFs IT HFsREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mendota Heights that the City of Mendota Heights endorses
the application by the City of Eagan for ISTEA funds to complete
trail connections to the Minnesota River Valley trails system.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 6th
day of April, 1993.
ATTEST:
���� ���
athleen M. Swanson,
City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
BY �....�. �. �Ll.�.�...�'
Charles E. Mertensotto,
Mayor
�
CITX OF �DOTJ# HEIGHTS
DAROTA COUNTY, blINNESOTA
RESOLUTIOIa NO. 94-
A RESOLIITION SIIPPORTING EFFORTS OF TH� CITY OF EAGAN TO
TR.AIL�AY CONNECTIONS INTO THE MINNESOTA RIVER VALLLY
�YSTEb�
YPBEREAS, Dakota County and the Cities of Mendota Hei hts and
Eagan have worked cooperatively in supporting the establis ent of
the Northwest Regional Trail (Soo Line Trail) and have w rked to
jointly pursue the coordinated development of trail connect ons and
linkages through the Minneaota River Valley; and
WHEREAS, this network of trails will offer the public
opportunities for trail related recreation including bi
walking, jogging, nature enjoyment, and other recreation
in and around the Minnesota and Mississippi River Valleys
�HEREAS, an integrated system of trails will provide c
with new opportunities to gain direction pedestrian ac
significant points of destination in adjoining commi
including the Mall of America, Fort Snelling State Park, M:
Park, Hidden Falls/C'rosby Farm Park, Lilydale/Harriet Isla�
Lebanon Hills Regional Park and the Minnesota Zoo; and
�PHEREAS, the completion of key trail linkages wi17
local commuters with alternative modes of pedestrian transp
to and from major employers within the Minnesota River Val
including the Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport, V
Hospital, Ford Motor Company, Mall of America, Blue Cr
Shield Corporation and Northwest Airlines, to name a few;
�PHEREAS, the City of Eagan has placed its highest pr
trails connections into the Minnesota River Valley
promoting the inter-agency trails network concept; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has applied for matching
ISTEA funds to construct such trails.
NOW THERSFORL B$ IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Counc
City of Mendota Heights that the°City of Mendota Heights
the application by the City of Eagan for ISTEA funds to
trail connections to the Minnesota River Valley trails s�
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota He
15th day of March, 1994.
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTI� HEIGHT
�cling,
.rsuita
and
itizens
:ess to
nities,
Park,
afford
rtation
ey area
teran's
sg/Blue
and
�rity on
thereby
federal
1 of the
:ndorses
;omplete
;tem.
�ts this
Charles F. Mertensotto Mayor
� :
� •
CITY OF D�NDOT�i �EIGHTS
DAKOTA COUIJTY, �III�INESOTA
PARKS AND RECREATION COb�iISSION MINIITES
Mp,RG� 8, 19 9 4
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and Re '
Commission was held on Tuesday, Nlarch 8, 1994, in the Ci
Large Conference Room, 1101 Victoria Curve. The meeting wa
to order at 6:40 o'clock P.M. The following members were
Spicer, Norton, Kleinglass, Linnell, Katz and Libra. Also
were Administrative Assistant Reyin Batchelder, Parks
Manager Guy Kullander and Recreation Programmer Shelli
Guests present at the meeting were Dan Rostrader, Dave and
Barnes and Sandy Running.
APPROVAL OF MINUTE3
Commissioner
minutes.
Commissioner
AYESs 7
NAY3a 0
eation
Y Hall
called
resent
resent
roiect
Linnell moved to approve the February �, 1994
Rleinglass seconded the motion.
DISCIISSION OF CONCSPT
DESIGN - NORTH RENSINGTON
PARK
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated the Pa�
Recreation Commission had hosted a neighborhood mee
February 24 at which approximately 40 residents atte
provide input and suggestions about the development
park in their neighborhood. Batchelder stated it
positive meeting and that the City staff has rece:
written comments or letters and approximately one doze
calls from interested residen�s regarding the park's
Batchelder stated it was not easy to categorize all
comments but listed the following preferences a�
expressed by residenta in the area:
Park Use Preferences
Landscaping, berms, plantings, trees
Tennis at Hagstrom-King
Gathering area/picnic tables
Passive, open park
"Backyard" concept
Opposed to active uses
Opposed to parking
Basketball hoop
13
11
10
9
8
7
7
5
ks and
:ing on
ided to
of the
was a
ved 25
1 phone
iesign.
of the
being
t e'
Horseshoes
Barbecue pits
Benches/rest area
Badminton/shuffleboard/bocce ball
Volleyball
Par Course and Paths
Tennis Courts at Kensington
Ice Skating/Roller Hockey
Wildflower Beds
Pond Improvementa
Parks and Recreation Commission
March 8, 1994
Page 2
5
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
1
1
Commissioner Spicer suggested that the Parks Commission divide
up the issues about the development of North Rensington Park.
Spicer stated it is apparent there is a demand for tennis in
this area, however it also apparent that the Hagstrom-King
seems to be the preferred site for tennis . Spicer stated that
tennis should be considered for Hagstrom-Ring Park.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder inquired if the Commission
desired to see this placed in the Capital Improvements Plan or
to be done as part of the referendum. Spicer suggested this
could be the final spending out of the referendum and stated
there is approximately $80, 000 left in the referendum. Spicer
stated if you subbract the $30, 000 for tennis at Hagstrom-Ring
the remainder could be spent on North Kensington Park.
Chair Ratz stated the Commission should separate the issue of
North Kensington Park development and the tennis, but that
North Kensington Park should be addressed first.
Commissioner Spicer moved to recommend that the City Council
approve the construction of tennis courts at Hagstrom-Ring
Park, as there is neighborhood support, and that the City has
pre-planned for it with the grading in the area.
Commissioner Damberg seconded the motion.
Commissioner Norton inquired if tennis is approved for
Hagstrom-King if it could be handled as an early and high
priority on the Capital Improvements Plan. The Commission was
of a consensus that this could be done as a high priority item
in the Capital Improvementa Plan and directed staff to place
this in the Capital Improvements Plan.
AYESs 7
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Spicer stated he feela it is obvious a green area
is the preferred option of the development of North Kensington
Park and that this park skaould be developed along the lines of
the backyard concept. Batchelder stated that while many of
the residents have indicated that they desired a passive or
Parks and Recreation
I�arch 8, 1994
Page 3
open, backyard concept for this area there were many �
suggestions about how this could be achieved.
Commissioner Spicer moved that the Parks and R�
Commission recommend that a backyard concept plan be
for North Rensington Park.
Commissioner Damberg seconded the motion.
The Parks Commission discussed how a backyard concept �
designed for this park. Commissioner Spicer stated Y
the backyard concept would exclude active uses. Comm�
Damberg stated the neighborhood wants a quieter park,
the suggestions about how to achieve this get very s�
Commissioner Damberg mentioned a couple of �
suggestions the Parks Commisaion had received for e
planting trees along the north end of the park to scre
traffic along Huber Drive. Commissioner Damberg sta
people in this area obviously have taken a good hard
the design of this park and that any concept plans
utilize the auggestions made by residents in the are�
Commissioner Spicer stated he feels the Commission and
could direct staff to draw up concept plans based c
suggestions. Chair Ratz stated there is some contr�
apparent in that some prefer an open, passive are
others prefer a heavily landscaped type of
Commissioner Linnell stated that, for instance, th
screen proposed along the north edge of the park to bl�
and traffic conflicts with the need to have an open �
visibility into the park.
Parks Project Manager Rullander atated any concept
should be based on the numbers of anticipated park
Kullander stated, for instance, if three or four barbe�
were placed in the park with eight or ten picnic tab7
would attract enough people where parking would be
Kullander stated that under this scenario, unless parl
provided, there would be parking along Mendota HeigY
which is a situation we would prefer to avoid. Kt
described how the City could construct a grass park�
that would have a more open, natural look to it than
parking area. He stated if groups are encouraged to c�
this park, then parking should be considered.
Commissioner Spicer atated he feels it would be apprc
have a couple of barbecue pits and some picnic t�
plantings to make it attractive in this area. C:
stated the Commission must consider that if this is
park and th�re are attractive parking
considered.
uses,
ssion
f erent
ation
igned
�uld be
feels
sioner
cific.
�ecific
:ample,
;n f rom
ed the
ook at
should
these
ction
while
.
sign.
heavy
: wind
k and
design
users.
:ue pits
es this
needed.
:ing was
ts Road
llander
ng area
a paved
�me into
�.ate to
es and
r Katz
public
st be
� r
Parks and Recreation Commission
March 8, 1994
Page 4
Commissioner Norton inquixed if it could be designed on a
scale to discourage parking. Kullander stated that any picnic
activities that are planned are going to draw people in
automobiles as most people will not desire to carry picnic
supplies a long distance. The Commission discussed the use of
this park by those in the immediate vicinity. �
Mr. Dan Rostrader, Brentwood resident, stated if he desired to
picnic in this area he would go to the south part of the park
where there are swings for his children to use and picnic
shelters avai�able. Spicer stated that maybe the City should
consider two barbecue pits and no more than five picnic
tables. Rullander inquired if the Commission was interested
in any grass or natural parking area. The Commission
indicated they were not.
Commissioner Spicer stated we should design this park with a
backyard concept to include two barbecue pits, four picnic
tables, no parking, appropriate landscaping and a bench or two
along the pathway. Spicer also stated that wildflowers could
be placed around the pond. Commissioner Damberg suggested
that bushes with berries be used in addition to wildflowers in
order to enhance the wildlife in the area.
Ms. Barbara Barnes inquired about the ahallow pond and stated
that it appears it is a].most dry during the summer. She
inquired if this pond could be improved. Kullander responded
that this pond is a detention pond designed to slow stormwater
in the area and that it does dry up in dry years. Kullander
stated this pond has no clay bottom to holci water, however
more water will be in this pond now that the adjacent
development has occurred. Ms. Barnes inquired if this pond
could be improved.
Parks Project Manager Kullander stated the City could scrape
out the pond and put in a clay bottom and put some appropriate
landscaping around the edge of it. Kullander estimated it
would cost approximately $5, 000 to $10, 000 to improve the pond
and stated the City would desire that the pond not be too much
deeper, maybe a maximum of three or four feet deep. Rullander
stated this pond won't be pristine, that there is runoff from
adjacent streets and that the pond would be flushed out every
time there is a heavy rain storm.
Kullander suggested plantings that would be appropriate around
a pond, such as wildflowers, cattails and bushes.
Chair Katz stated the Commission should return to the generic
backyard concept that had been proposed by Commissioner Spicer
and discuss this earlier motion.
Parks and Recreation
March 8, 1994
Page 5
Commissioner Spicer restated his
that the City utilize a backyard
Park with landscaping plan being
received from the neighborhood.
includes two barbecue pits, four
along the walkway.
ssion
motion and moved to r commend
concept for North Ke sington
based on the requests we have
Spicer stated this motion
picnic tables and two benches
Commissioner Linnell suggested the Parks Commission
consider hiring a professional landscape architect to
landscape plan. Linnell stated he is considering offe�
talent� as a landscape architect and to do thi:
volunteer, however, he is not sure he has the t
adequately finish this plan for the City. The Con
discussed including the hiring of a professional la
architect to design an appropriate landscape
Commissioner Spicer accepted this friendly amendment.
Chair Katz seconded the motion.
AYESt 7
NAYS: 0
Parks Project Manager Rullander inquired what the dolla
is that they would like to see for this motion. Commil
Spicer stated that the City has approximately $80,000
the referendum and that $25, 000 has been earmarked for
power line poles, and that $30,000 to $35,000 would b
for tennis at Hagstrom-Ring. Kullander stated the
pits are relatively inexpensive and that the City alr
picnic tables in stock as inventory. Commissioner
stated that landscaping not to exceed $20,000
appropriate.
Commissioner Kleinglass inquired the cost for hi:
architect. Kullander stated this would likely cost t
approximately $3,000 to $5,000, however we would have
request for proposals on the design of the landsca�
Chair Katz stated she feels the City needs to expl
least expensive design options for this park.
Commissioner Spicer moved to recommend that the
concept be planned at a range of $20,000 to $30,000
cost including the landscape architect's fees.
Commissioner Damberg seconded the motion.
AYF�S : 7
NAYS: 0
should
do this
�ing his
� as a
ime to
mission
ndscape
plan.
,r range
ssioner
left in
raising
needed
.dy has
Spicer
ay be
.ng an
e City
to get
plan.
re the
th this
Parks and Recreation Commission
March 8, 1994
Page 6
The Commission discussed design specifics for North Kensington
Park. Kullander stated City �taff would have to seek rec�uest
for proposals and choose an architect to do the design. The
Commission discussed the planning and construction and the use
of volunteers to cut costs at this park.
Commissioner Linnell inquired of other Commissioners what type
of guidance the Commission would want to provide the architect
for this park. The Commission discussed grasa volleyball,
picnic shelters and horseshoes. Commissioner Spicer stated we
should develop the park with a backyard concept and see what
fits. Commissioner FCleinglass stated he prefers to give the
architect some room to suggest appropriate uses. The
Commission agreed.
Mr. and Mrs. David Barnes suggested that a barbecue pit be
included at the South Kensington Park as well as barbecue pits
at North Kensington Park. The Commission was of the consensus
that one pit should be placed in South Rensington Park.
CELEBRATE biENDOTA
HEIGHTS PARRS
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated the City Council
had been invited, at their February 15th meeting, to volunteer
for the Steering Committee that will plan this coming year's
park celebration. Batchelder stated this event was publicized
at the February 15th City Council meeting so that we can begin
generating interest. Batchelder stated recruitment would then
expand to include previous sponsors, volunteers and the
community at large.
Commissioner's Libra, Norton, Katz and Spicer volunteered to
be on the Steering Committee.
Recreation Programmer Morgan discussed the use of a Mend-Eagan
tournament in conjunction with this year's celebration and
stated this would probably mean this celebration would be one
of the last two weekends in July. Morgan stated we had had
success in involving Mend-Eagan last year and that this tends
to generate a lot of families in the park on the day of the
celebration.
Commissioner Norton stated she thinks it ia great that we are
getting an early start on this year's planning and that this
would allow us to consider additional events such as using the
trails and different parks in the City. Commissioner Norton
stated she felt the focus should be on acquainting people with
�
Parks and Recreation
March 8, 1994
Page 7
ssion
the park and park system and perhaps the City could se some
type of door prize drawing based on getting a stamp t each
event located around the City.
PARK RESERVATION POLICY
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated that
month's meeting the Commission discussed the City's F
reservation of our five adult sized softball/youth
fields, the priorities for reservations and the assi
reservations to competing uaer groups. Batchelder s
Commission had suggested that Recreation ProgrammE
seek clarification on this issue at tonight's meeti
Commissioner Spicer stated that Exhibit C lists the pr
for assignment of reservations for the aoftball fie:
stated that second priority is given to organize
programs of Mendota Heights. Spicer referred the Co�
to item 4g in the Reservation Policy. He stated t]
item defines the organized youth programs in Mendota
as the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Departmen
Eagan Athletic Association, Sibley Area Girl's Fasi
Sibley Sting Soccer and non-profit organizations
Mendota Heights City limits. Commissioner Spicer f�
priority number two could have an additional word�
states "as described in Section 4g". Spicer stated
defines what he feels was�assumed were the organized�
in Mendota Heights.
.t last
icy for
aseball
ment of
ted the
Morgan
�rities
is . He
. youth
nission
�t this
fieights
, Mend-
Pitch,
within
Lt that
ig that
�hat 4g
Commissioner Linnell offered an alternative suggest'on that
the priorities discussed in Exhibit C could be ame ded to
state "the larger the number of Mendota Heights resi ents in
the organized youth program, the higher the priority f r field
reservations". Chair Katz stated that she feels Comm'ssioner
Linnell's proposal makes sense.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder cautioned the C
about changing priorities or policies in mid stream c
current reservation period.
The Commission discussed current reservations and
interests with Recreation Programmer Morgan. Morg
she attempta to accommodate all Mendota Heights resi
make field requests, however she is receiving
requeste for the same fields on the same
Commissioner Spicer stated at the recent sign ups
Eagan baseball he was asked by numerous parents
baseball programs are not playing on the Mendakota
saion
�q the
peting
stated
.t s who
peting
f r Mend-
hy the
f ' elds .
Parks and Recreation Commission
March 8, 1994
Page 8
The Commission discussed the use of Sibley Park and
Independent School District 197's fields. The Commission
discussed priority based on historical rights. Recreation
Programmer Morgan stated that she gets requests from new
organizations that have xecently formed and we have to attempt
to find room for them a� well.
Commissioner Libra stated that Item 4a in the Park Reservation
Policy should be amended to state "neighborhood park
reservations are reserved on a first come, first served basis
on the weekends".
The Commission discussed the competing interests for
reservations at Civic Center field. Commissioner Rleinglass
moved to recommend that City staff make a good faith effort to
accommodate the Pegasus traveling team at Sibley Park or offer
available nights at Civic Center Park.
Commissioner Norton seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
ABSTAIN: 2, SPICER, NORTON
The Commission discussed scheduling and giving historical
priority to teams who have demonstrated continuing need for
fields. The Commission discussed Commissioner Linnell's
proposed amendment to the policy to add the wording that
priority will be given to "the larger the number of Mendota
Heights residents in the organized youth program, the higher
the priority for field reservations". The Commission felt it
appropriate to revisit this issue next Fall for possible
amendments to avoid changing the priorities and policies
during the current registration period.
TREE CITY IISA
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated over the last few
years the Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council
have discussed forestry options and level of service in the
City of Mendota Heights. Batchelder atated that during the
1994 Budget process the City Council had decided not to
authorize expenditures for forestry personnel and had directed
staff to provide a referral service for interested property
owners and to explore options of working with volunteers and
finding grant programs. Batchelder stated he had been meeting
with Mr. Steve Shimek, a Horticultural Specialist with the
Minnesota Department of Agriculture who is a Mendota Heights
resident and has indicated an interest in assisting the City
on tree issues. Batchelder stated he has discussed tree
inspector certification, tree specifications, newsletter
Parks and Recreation
March S, 1994
Page 9
articles, Arbor Day celebrations, private consultat
Tree City USA and coordinated grant programs with Mre
Batchelder stated Tree City USA status is nece
the City desires to pursue grant programs t
available. Batchelder stated some of these
include the Minnesota ReLeaf planting programs,
control grants, the Energy Conservation through C
Forestry Program, the Urban and Community
Challenge Grants Program and the Small
Administration Natural Resources Development Pr
Chair Ratz inquired if there was any desire on the par
Commission to pursue Tree City USA status. Comm
Kleinglass indicated he was not interested in this
Commissioner Spicer inquired if the City really had
to pursue this. Commissioner Damberg stated she fee
have a value as a resource in the community and that Z
USA status should at least be considered.
The Commission tabled this item until their April
REQIIEST FOR TR.AIL SEGMENT
Parks Project Manager Kullander stated he had rec
request for an additional trail segment on Mendota
Road from the Mendota Heights Road Traffic Signal Tas.
Rullander stated this Task Force has been looking at
a traffic signal at the intersection of Dodd Road and
149. He stated the Task Force feels it is�difficult
Dodd Road because the trail switches from the south
the north side of Mendota Heights Road as it crosf
Road. Kullander stated that the desired extra segme�
run from Dodd Road to the Bridgeview Shores developme
the north side of Mendota Heights Road and is a duplic
a trail on the south side of Mendota Heights Road. K�
stated this trail can be proposed to be included in t:
funding and if it is approved MnDOT will pay for th:
segment. Kullander stated if MnDOT does not approve
for this trail segment it could be paid with MSA moi
explained that no motion is necessary from th�
Commission.
sion
ons and
Shimek.
sary if
iat are
, Wilt
unity
estry
iness
of the
sioner
desire
s trees
�ee City
ting.
eived a
Heights
: Force .
getting
Highway
:o cross
side to
es Dodd
it would
it along
ition of
illander
ie MnDOT
s trail
funding
,ey . He
: Parks
The Commission indicated that City staff should pursue
inclusion of this trail segment in the request for the traffic
signal at Dodd Road and Mendota Heights Road.
Parks and Recreation Commission
March 8, 1994
Page 10
1994 MINNESOTA FIRE
DFPARTMENT CObIlKtTNITY SERVICE
1�,WARD
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated that on March 3rd
the City Council had passed a resolution nominating the
Mendota Heights Fire Department for the 1994 Minnesota Fire
Department Community Service Award. Batchelder stated this
resolution and nomination is based on the various community
activities undertaken by the Fire Department for the benefit
of the community. Batchelder �stated Fire Chief John Maczko
was requesting that the Parks and Recreation Commission
consider authorizing Vicki Katz, Chair, to write a letter of
support of this nomination. He stated the Fire Department had
provided significant volunteer efforts at the last two
Celebrate Mendota Heights Parks! events and they also assist
the park efforts through their ataffing of the Mendakota
concession stand.
Commissioner Damberg moved to authorize Chair Katz to sign a
letter of support for the nomination of the Mendota Heights
Fire Department for the 1994 Minnesota Fire Department
Community Service Award. .
Commissioner Spicer seconded the motion.
AYSSs 7
NAYS: 0
VERBAL IIPDATES
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated that the City
Council had considered overhead netting at Mendakota Park at
their February 15th meeting. He stated City Council had
directed staff to conduct additional research on issues
involved with overhead netting including maintenance, costs,
effectiveness, as well as, looking at other possible
alternative options.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated that he had
received preliminary summary evaluations from Dakota County on
the North Urban Regional Trail. Batchelder stated the County
is looking at three alternatives for the North Urban Trail
through the City of Mendota Heights including routes
Wentworth Avenue, Marie Avenue and Trunk Highway 110. He
stated all alternatives do have one thing in common which is
that they proceed north through Valley Park to link Lilydale
and the Soo Line Trail. Batchelder stated City staff was
meeting with County staff and their consultant on March 9th to
discuss these preliminary findings.
Parks and Recreation
Nlarch 8, 1994
Page il
Batchelder provided an update on �the County
system that had been received from the County.
Batchelder stated he had received a request from the
Eagan seeking endorsement or resolution of support f
ISTEA grant. He stated the City of Fagan is pursuing
grant for trail construction in the Cedar Avenue/M
River area that would be a part of the loop system co.
Mendota Heights and Eagan to the I-494/Minnesota Rive
crossing. Batchelder stated the City of Mendota Hei�
provided this resolution of support last year but th
was not awarded the ISTEA grant.
sion
trail
City of
r their
.n ISTEA
nnesota
necting
�Valley
hts had
t Eagan
Commissioner Kleinglass recommended that City Council approve
a Resolution of support for the current Eagan ISTEA g ant for
trails in the Cedar Avenue/Minnesota River Valley ar a.
Commissioner Norton seconded the motion.
AYES: 7
NAYSs 0
Commissioner Linnell stated the City should consider t e Diane
to Celia Road trail link. Rullander explained the osts of
construction and the availability of MSA funding. The
Commission felt that this trail link should be include in the
Capital Improvements Plan.
r � � t�; �I�a��+�l+
There being no further business, the Parks and Re�
Commission adjourned its meeting at 8:45 o'clock P.M
Respectfully submitted,
Revin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
tion
.
� �"��i � , ' LI...Q,
.. � '�� �
� ��� l�t.aa,. 1���.�� i���
�l I�T - 1��2i
� ��..�-
,i . �� , �r
t , � �, I
� �2Z, �-~ � � Z`�
� �' �'-'�'�-
�n��.�.�. 1���-
�'lZ -- 3' 1�
� �� ��
1� j �
, � � r �i � a
i.l O • 't �� � � ♦ i • - zT• �
. • � ',
�" f L� K . �
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Admini t
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson �j�
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Classification of Forfeited Property
INFORMATION
Eleven parcels of properiy in Mendota Heights have been forfeited for non-pa
real estate taxes for the years 1987 through 1989. In preparation for the sale of these
Dakota County Board, on February 18, took action to classify them as non-conserval
The County Auditor has requested that the City Council approve the classification of
in order to allow for their eventual sale.
DISCUSSION
10, 1994
�nt of
;els, the
lands.
pazcels
Seven of the forfeited parcels are located in the Northland Plaza plat, located a the
southeast quadrant of T.H. 55 and Mendota Heights Road. The remainder are in the rki
Centre Pointe South plat, which is located at the southwest quadrant of T.H. 110 and exu
Avenue. All of the parcels are identified on the attached drawings.
The City ha.s two options with respect to classification of tax forfeited pazcels.
can choose to approve the non-conservation classification, thereby allowing the sa1e, �
public need is identified, can request a change to the conservation classification. The
Plaza. properties aze fully improved, including street lights, and are prime developmen
There is no identifiable public need for any of the Northland pazcels nor for any but o:
Yorkton Centre Pointe South paxcels. It is the opinion of Public Works Director Dani
however, that the parcel located at the immediate intersection of the frontage road and
Avenue (Outlot A- Parcel #27-88100,010-00) should be reserved for storm water dra
purposes.
RECOMMENDATION
Council
�ifa
parcels.
; of the
Lexington
I recommend that Council approve the non-conservation classification for all f the
forfeited parcels except Outlot A of the Centre Pointe plat and direct staff to request akot�
County to provide the forms necessary to classify Outlot A as conservation land in pr paral
for its transfer to the city for storm water drainage purposes.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should approve the non-conserv
classification for Lots 5 and 7, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Yorkton Centre Pc
and Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 Block 1 and Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2, of Northland Plaza, and
conservation classification for Outlot A, Yorkton Centre Pointe South directing staff
from the County the forms necessary to implement the conservation classification an�
the land to the city for storm water drainage purposes.
South
� request
transfer of
i �I/' ' r . . • . . 4yr ^f�(,w.;.'.~iR•iyt:�i`.'T�� �.. y..�%``vY' .
'��.�. �j'..�.4�:P✓.eic�'Sj� n;,J���;*r�_ •
' �,�i d y^•.��' � � fn'ti,� ;t+�.
� � � T��^t•�..y��.r .. . i.. •.. • ♦ ,r .'I�.v .�,..I•.. • ...�'!^:r� �hZ, U}'.'.:�11A . . .. ±«
� ' � . y. �i:tiC , . . :.:' `` •: . Al:?:1�Y�,%�n' . .. �'�//� � 't,. t.�� �i. .+h ij,.
�...r.,�;
. S .�,•�...•.:t.IQ �+..r :•� �: `f. �,..,,•,>::rr'•:_
... . . ' � .. . � ,� 1"w. :. � . . � . . ' ' . : ..ti:. . � •��
.. . • 'Vyr`� . . .. ., ..r • . • , ,
•'.th•.' .+f�V,'rl� .. .� � � ... ti ' � . . ' � _ �.. • . , +..• '��^"� ` `" ... w4 '���..�.' �.; � ' . :
fY w.. '.�Y.. �'� �' - Ke �.
♦�:`r wi' + :.'T"� j., r.n' �:,�','�",,,�
� •'a;,:?;o . :.�ilw+'wt'.:Y".:: a. . . � rt � . �
�� _ =� -_ � � ." _ . . � F _R' :._`�__�� T � � � �'';�".���'�:
„� .,..��,�� ;i� .;. . _�_ �- , �
-" -�- �:_=::.:�" a � �;;�- ..�.
• a•, . 4 . ' � � 4� � 7 � � / • 4 Q t . `. �i, r I
. � � 3 4 , _ r�
' • .. !t �/� � '� ' ✓ _ :�,�,�{ -- . .. � . •
t • .�� .1.• ,I j j . : i ti..J� , �
.:= � 'G�" _.�—_--,
� �l �•tr � � � � . � � / . '
-� `w: . � , Q W � � '�.' //
.;� • , �v'. �i ry . � V Z t 347:f�i�i.�t5 {�7 'i /
! , �' -{}�� ` �"' 4
' � y�• " \ ' � � � ..+ � Q" (
u '�� �� I /
� ,.., . � . , }�' �0 7' ;
� �' ,a � ; � l �) ..� „1 - � /
..��.�' �``" U � .._. _ � � '� 1 � (.410p.. Oto--d9— .
� ' ' ' � .,� , �' 2 � ��tr . . f
_ c � . � � . -� � U � � .�� � � _._,_ , . -
�� � Y �
4r .`'�" ' GEEJTRE 'F'OfNI'E 1'R1V�. �
l ( � • �} � � 41
i � � I � � �� ���i2� i/ �♦ � �,l ' 2 ��' _ . �'
`� '�" i'r r% . � �a
/� f} 3 �+ � t
v i%, - � ' � � �f '� '� 4 ~ •x � �+-r G' t . .. t .
. - ' , • • �tV G•.. t ^ • ' . ,
.. - � � _ ,�. - - - �``.. r� �k °, • ,) .. . . ., . . ... _ . ' . ..� .,.' . ^ . ,... . . . . f • ` � � O
: 5�.�''{� Y`"';ks�'':, � . . . .. ". ; ,, . . ..."�' ' . .. , ~
:��5�' 'w• '. ;,';s ,,���,�.�.1. . . : G.:.� . •, ��O r, . . . � � ._ .. • ' � . ' ' �
� �� � � �' :.�� : � �� . . �,`��.aP . . � ' - � ... � . � - .. . � � X
i . yn.
�•'<• ' ��, �' . • ,:y,si,:�:`lt • . , . . . - : �'Fi . • . .. . � . . ' �+ W
. �j ' ' �i.'•E�\� , . �� .a::' .. . , • . • . J
—�i !�` — 200� • �';` . `{��� ." +. :.,V ..`, _
. �;�,..�`;� v�{-� �� � . - : . . l,Y..���<.1: . , - . -
i : �w,� . .
' E � ; �' ; �, � 11 � . .:.� . � ' .�. : � .: •: . . , ',
��
�p,4�1'd�-�-.. � • .�� . • � � . �� �`,�� ,.; �g, p:,.:: - . . . .. � .
,. ,�.,i .
x, `3��.:� , . .. � . . „ � ... � � ' . � � . ...
;,.J ; ` ` ;+� �_ :�i ' . � . . , . . ..
� . ; �.
, .
�
� h ' . � ,
�
, r� r�.z" �'�9
�
.. f���.�-� ' � S���, JrkT yo , Q
. t SA � �_, YT� t ��
. ; Yi, r. � .,
.:� 3� �
. , . ����>�Ny{5r� � r �,c �-�e
" ,� ,� .
. , � Q..
. � �.r A. �� �
. e {�. ��' , #..i
. L� ��y L�+` ���
� �,.`.`b. �'f � •
� s � "r� "Y°s` �:
.- , .. . n ., � . . �+� �', "'i'}L�P's�{
.'.,�„�.. —' —`— — -- � . —
� .
' ;c:H^:9
•""� • �
r �i
a
CITY OF MENDOTA SEIGHTS
DAROTA COIINTY, �lINNE50TA
RESOIa�I0I1 I19. 94 -
ItE50LIITI0N APPROVING TH$ 1�aCQIIISITIOri OF TAX FOItFEIT
BOHEREAS, the Dakota County Assessor'a Office has info ed the
City that a parcel of land described as Outlot A, Xorkto Centre
Pointe South (27-88100-010-00) has been offered for sale as Tax
Forfeit Property; and
WHEREAS, the parcel located at the intersection of Hig way 110
and Lexington Avenue is currently open space and it ill be
necessary for the City to reserve this area for the deve'lo ment of
storm water drainage.
NOW THEREFORS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of he City
of Mendota Heights that the City declarea this parcel is ne ded for
conservation purposes and that the City acquire said parc l.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota HeigY�ts this
15th day of March, 1994. I
ATTEST:
Kathleen Me Swanson
City Clerk
By
CITX COUNCIL
CI�'Y OF MENDOTA HEI
Charle� F. Mertensotto
Niayor
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CI'i'Y O� MENDOTA �EIGHTS
..r�+ :r.
March 10, 1994
Mayor, City Council and City Adm 's
7ames E. Dani
Pubic Works Dir
Traffic 5ignal at Trunk Highway 149 and Mendota Heights Road
DISCUSSION:
At the February 1, 1994 meeting Council adopted a resolution requesting r
Special Agreement Funds to install a traffic signal at the intersection of Trunk Hig
(Dodd Road) and Mendota Heights Road. If the special agreement funding is app�
signal will be funded according to the "contributing legs" theory, where Mn/DOT
for one half the construction costs associated with that project because they own o�
roads entering the intersection and the City will pay for the other half (out of MS�
I met with Mn/DOT o�cials on March 8th for aa update on the mc�uest an
informed me that the request has passed its first review board test. It is now very
likely that we will be successful in obtaining Mn/DOT funds for this project this f:
The request now gaes to the Mn/DOT Central office for a review and then finally
Council. These last two reviews will take appmximately 1.5 months.
way 149
�ved, the
�ill pay
; half the
funds).
they
u year.
Met
Mn/DOT encourages the City to begia the process of hiring a consultant to help with
the desiga of the signals so that we are able to get the project constructed fiscal y 1995,
7uly 1, 1994 -7une 30, 1995.
� � i i� � • �
I recommend that Council authorize staff to solicit proposals from
to begin the signal design.
ACTION RQEUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the recommendation they should pass a m
authorizing staff to solicit proposals that would then be presented to Council for
approvai by Council at a future meeting.
� JED: dfw
consultants
and
� ',
0
FIRE CALLS NO.
MENDOTA HEIGHTS FlRE DEPARTMENT
FEBRUARY 1994 MONTHLY REPORT
94026 - 94044 NUMBEROFCALLS:
FlRE ALARMS DISPATCHED: NUMBER STRUCTURE CO�ITENTS
ACTUAL FlRES
Structure - MH Commerciai
Structure - MH Residential 1
Structure - Contract Areas
Vehicle - MH
Vehicle - Contract Areas
Grass/Brush/No Value MH
Grass/Brush/No Value Contract
MEDICAL _
Assist 7
Extrication 1
HAZARDOUS SITUATION
Spilis/Leaks 1
Arcing/Shorting 1
Chemical
Power Llne Down
FALSE ALARM
Residential Malfunction 1
Commercial Malfunction 3
Unintentional - Commercial 1
Unintentional - Residential 1
Criminal 1
GOOD INTENT
Smoke Scare
Steam Mistaken for Smoke
Other 1
MUTUAL AID
TOTAL CALLS 1 9
LOCATION OF FlRE ALARMS: TO DATE
MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1 6 3 9
MENDOTA 0 0
SUNFISH LAKE 0 1
LILYDALE 3 3
OTHER 1
TOTAL 19 44
WORK PERFORMED HOURS TO DATE
FIRE CALLS 48 5. 5 10 3 5
MEETINGS 5 4 12 4
DRILLS 6 0 1 82
'EEKLY CLEAN-UP 2 8 58.5
'ECIAL ACTIVITY 31 43
ADMINISTATIVE 0 0
FIRE MARSHAL 7 6 145. 5
TOTALS 734.5 1588
$175,000
19
MISC.
TOTAL MONTHLY FlRE LOSSES
$175,000 $0 $0
FlRE LOSS TOTALS MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ALL FIRES, ALL AREAS (MONTH) $175,000
MEND. HTS. ONLY STRUCT/CONTENTS .
MEND. HTS. ONLY MISCELLANEOUS
MEND. HTS. TOTAL LOSS TO DATE
BILLING FOR SERVICES
AGENCY THIS MONTH
MN/DOT
MILW. RR
Cf�R RR
OTHERS:
LAST YEAR
32
1
3
2
2
40
LAST YEAR
812.5
105
241
65.5
222.5
144.5
1591
TOTALS: $ 0
FIRE MARSHAL'S TIME FOR
INSPECTIONS
INVESTiGATIONS
RE-INSPECTIOfJ
MEEfINGS
ADMINISTRATION
SPECIAL PRQIECTS
TOTAL
REMARKS: SEE OTHER SIDE
'ALS TO DATE
75,000
$0
$4,000
$0
179,000
175,000
$4,000
179,000
26.5
10.5
13
24
2
76
SYNOPSIS
<<•" �
SYNOPSIS
Firefighters res�ponded to 19 calls during February, 1994. pf these
calls, two were significant.
On February.7th the department responded to a call at 1830 Eagle
Ridge Drive involvmg a chimney fire. A fire had started inside the walls
surrounding a gas fireplace. The fire bumed upward through the wood
frame pipe chase and worked onto the second and third floors of the
building. Fireman carried hose pacs into the bundling and used standpipes
in the building for a water supply. �Iand tools were then used to re�oee
sheet rock, carpet, and panelmg in order to get to the base of the fire.
Ineestigators later produced evidence that a set of glass dvors had
been improp erly installed on the fireplace. This allowed a build up of heat
in the wood structure surroundin� the fire box. Estimated fire lost was
$175,000.
On February 12th, in the early aftemoon, firefighters responded to a
hazardous ammonia leak at 2520 PiIot Knob Road. Ammonia is used in a
film process that takes lace in the building (duplicating film). While
switching from one 15�1b. tank over to an other, ammonia started leaking
from the valves. This leaked forced the employee to flee from the work
site and the building was evacuated. We sent fire personnel in full
protective gear into the building to stabilize the tanlcs and to shut off all
supply valves. We then ventilated the entire building, checked the welfare
o�the employees and then returned to the fire station where exposed fire
gear went throug� a complete decontamination process.
. ,�_: !� e�
Monthly Drill
Drill for February was on fireground ventilation techniques.
Firefighters were reinforced with the principles of vertical, horizontal, and
all aspects of positive pressure ventilation.
Monthly Sauad Drill
Sc�uad drill involved reviewing the proper techniques used in foam
applicahon and foam induction systems the department has.
Firefighters reviewed the proper,maintenance procedures needed in
working with our Waterous pumps. Videos were viewed on the different
types of Waterous fire pumps.
Y WORK PERFORMANCE FOR
1LLS FOR MONT}i FIRE FIRE FIRE PERCENT CLEAN MONTHLY GEN OFFICER SQUAD HAZ SPEqAL
19 CALLS CALL CALLS ATTENDED UP DRILL MTG MTG DRILL MAT ACT.
YEAR TO DATE A7T'D HOURS ATT'D THIS 1 2 1 2 2 ADM
44 MONTN MONTN YEAR YEAR HOURS HOURS HRS. HOURS HOURS HOUR HOURS HRS
Adrian, Ed 12 18.5 23 52% 1 2 1.5 2
Blaeser, Bret 11 16 27 61 % 1 2 1.5 2 3
Coates, Aaron 6 11 17 39% 1 2 1.5 2
Connally, Marcus 9 14 14 32% 1 2 1.5 2 7
Coonan, Mike 8 14.5 17 39% 1 2
Dreelan, David 13 18 26 59% 2 1.5 2 3
Dreelan, Paul 13 19.5 27 61 % 1 2 �
Henning, Scott 16 21 40 91 % 1 2 1.5 3 2
Husnik, T�d 3 8 9 20% 1 2 2
Kaufmann, Mark 11 22.5 25 57% 1 2 2
Kilburg, Jim 10 11.5 23 52% 1 2 1.5 3 2 1
Kingsiey, Roy 12 18.5 24 55% 1 2 7
Klarkowski, Walt 4 4 8 18% 1 2 1.5 2
Lapakko, John 14 19 31 70% 2 1.5
Lerbs, Bill 10 15 24 55% 1 2 1.5 2
Lerbs, Jamie 11 16 22 50% 1 2 1.5 3 2
Lowe, Geor e 15 21.5 31 70% 1 4 1.5 3 2
�"�^zko, John 9 14 25 57% 1 2 1.5 3 5
ko, Mike 12 18.5 25 57% 1 2 1.5 2
McNamara, Randy 3 8 12 27% 1 2 2
Nelson, Gerald, Jr. 16 22.5 39 89% 1 2 1.5 2
Neska, John 11 16 21 48% 1 2 3 2 7
Olund, Tom 6 11 7 16% 1 2 2
Oster, Tim 8 14.5 17 39% 1 2 1.5 2
Perron Jim 10 16.5 29 66% 1 2 1.5 2
Perron, Kevin 4 9 9 20% 1 2 1.5 2
Shields, Tom 11 17.5 20 45% 1 2 1.5 2
Skjerven, Gwdy 13 19.5 31 70% 1 2 1.5 2
Stein, Keith 14 19 32 73% 1 2 1.5 3 2
Stenhaug, Jeff 5 11.5 14 32% 1 2 1.5 2
Weinzettel, Tom 6 7.5 13 30% 1 2 1.5 2
Weisenburger, Ken 11 11 29 66% 1 2 1.5 2 1
Zwirn, Dick 1 1 22 50% 2
TOTAL FOR MONl}� 485.5 TOTAL ATTENDED 28 30 22 7 0 1 7
TOTAL FOR YEAR 1035 TOTAL MAN HOURS 28 60 33 21 0 0 31
THIS MONTH LAST MOM"FI LAST YEAR
AVE. RUNS/MAN 9.94 XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
AVE. MEN/RUN 16.74 16.60 14.06
F FOR YEAR 52.06 51.88 45.78
t� " �;
�_ � _ \/� \��J� : i� iV�
March
Ma
TO: Mayor, City Council and City
FROM: Shawn Sanders t�.� •
Civil Engineer
' 1. U J :Y�'' ��
.�
SUBJECT: Plans & Specifications
Mendota Heights Industrial Park
7ob No. 9213
Improvement No. 92, Project No. 5
The storm water system for the City's Industrial Park was constructed over
and provided adequate storm water drainage for the area for several years. Throu
the Industrial Park, the runoff potential has increased causing the e�risting storm ;
to exceed its capacity during large rain storms to flood low lying areas. In 1987, di
"Super Storm," the Printware building located at the northeast corner of Mendota l
and Pilot Knob Road was inundated with 2.5' of water. The damage suffered 1
demonstrated that design changes needed to be made to accommodate further exp
Industrial Park. �
The City acquired the services of Barr Engineering to complete a report
existing Industrial Park storm water system and to make a recommendation for an ei
water management plan for the Industrial Park. The results of the study include c
series of detention ponds, as land develops, throughout the Industrial Park to slow
of storm water into the existing storm water system, and to construct a large de
behind the Printware building.
DISCUSSION:
1994
years ago
growth of
�er system
ig the July
ghts Road
Printware
;ion of the
dying the
tive storm
tructing a
discharge
tion pond
Council received and approved the Barr report in October, 1992. The gineering
Department then proceeded with the project as recommended by Barr to solve th problem.
Funding for the pmject was to be by Tax Increment Financing (T'II�) and no assess ents will
levied to any properties in the Iadustrial Parl�.
1'he engineering department is cunently finishing the plans and spec� tions to
implement the recommendations made by Ban Engineering. T�vo detention gon s will be
constructed as part of this project. One being the large detention pond behind the Printware
� building and the othex being a medium size detention pond loca�d at Y,he northwest corner of
Mendota Heights Road and Enterprise Da�ve. iTnited Properties is cunently develop' g the site
;� • �r
on the south side of Mendota Heights Road adjacent to the pond. As part of their development,
a pond is being constructed that will serve four different watersheds in the up�er portion of the
Industrial Park Drainage District. An additional concem has been added to the project addressing
the erosion control problem at the Cray Research outlet. The area around ttus outlet has eroded
away the existing channel and side slopes endangering the access road to the rear of Cray
Research and the City's underground utilities. A drop manhole will be constructed and storan
pipe will be added to divert the water away from the access road.
Since the majority of the work to be constructed is not located on City owned land,
easements will be needed from the property owners. It appears that the easements needed from
Printware and Cray Research can be obtained without any compensation. Aowever, United
Properties who owns the land where the two detention ponds are located desires to be
compensated for the area taken by the ponds. The area for the easement is approximately
128,000 square feet. United Properties and Mendota Heights staff have negotiated on the price
of the land and have come to the conclusion that $2 per square foot would be a reasonable price
(Treasurer Shaughnessy has a cunent appraisal that indicates the fair mazket value).
The estimated costs for the construction of the two ponds, the Cray Research outlet
improvement, and easement compensation are listed below:
Construction Costs plus Engineering $850,000
and Overhead �
United Properties Easement $256,000
FSTIlVIATED TOTAL COSTS $1,106,000
The ideal time frame for construction would be to have the project coordinated at the
same time as the construction with the Mendota Interchange project. Work is set to begia this
spring on Pilot Knob Road and we would like to have our work completed prior to or during the
period of this construction. If plans and specifications are sent out in time, the contractor for
the Mendota Interchange Project, 7ohnson Brothers, may be interested in bidding on the project
and combining our project with theirs.
T'he Engineering Department is in the final stages of completing the plans and
specifications and seeks Council authorization to advertise for bids. We will open the bids on
Monday, April 4, 1994 and present the results to Council for award at their April 5, 1994
meeting. . .
ItECONi1V�NDATION:
Staff recommends that Council approve the plans and specifications and authorize staff
to advertise for bids. Staff also recommends that they be authorized to finalize negotiations with
United Properties on the purchase of the needed easements for the ponds.
ACTION REQ�JIRED:
� If Council concurs with the xecommendation they should pass a ma
Resolution No. 94-_, RESOLUTION �'PROVING FINAL PI
SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZIl�TG ADVERTISIIVIF�VT FOR
IlVIPROVF.II�NT TO SERVE THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS INDUST�
(IlVIPROVIIV�IV'r NO. 92, PROJECT NO. S' and authorizing staff to
negotiations with United Properties on acc�uiring the needed easements.
SS:dfw
adoptang
� E�1VD
5 FOR
PARK
�ue final
City of Mendota Heights
Dakolta County, 1Vginnesota
�OL�J'i'�OI�T 1V0.
RESOLUTION t1PPROVING k'IN� PI.ANS AND SPECIFICt��'IONS
A1VD AUTHORIZING ADVER�'IS�1vT FOR BIDS FOR �ROVF.�NTS
TO SERVE THE 1VIF.l�I)OTA �+ %(a�TS �TDUSTI�IEIL PARK
(IlV�ItOVk�1�1'r 1V0, 92, PItOJECT NO. 5)
�VHEREAS, the City Engineer reported that the proposed improvements and construction
thereof were feasible and desirable and furthe� reported on the progosed costs of said
improvements and construction thereof; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore directed that the City Engineer proceed witli
the preparation of plans and specifications thereof; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for said
improvements and has presented such plans and specif'ications to the City Council for approval.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the plans and specifacations for said improvements be and they are hereby
in all respects approved.
2. That the City Clerk with the aid and assistance of the City Engineer be and is
hereby authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said unprovements all in
accordance with the applicable 1Vdumesota 5tatutes, such bids to be received at the
City Hall of the City of Mendota Heights by 10:00 o'clock A.M., Monday, April
4, 1994, at which time they evill be publicly opened in the City Council Chambers
of the Ciry Hall by the City Engineer will then be tabulated, and will then be
considered by the Ciry Council at its next regular Council meeting.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 15th day of March, 1994.
CI'Y X COUNCII.
CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS
:
ATTPST:
Kathleen ivi. Swanson, City Clerk
Charles E. 1Vlertensotto, Mayor
� :r
To:
From:
Subj ect :
�ITY OF MENDOTA HLIGHTS
March 10, 1994
Mayor, City Council and City Administr
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assista t��
Proposed Resolution Approving St. Thomas
Application for Conditional Use Permit and Vari
DISCIISSION
At the March 3, 1994 City Council meeting, the
approved a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Struct
Height Variances for the light standards and the press box
room for St. Thomas Academy�s request to upgrade their f
track and soccer facilities. �'he Council established a n
findings and conditions of approval in addition to those
proposed resolution that incorporated the Planning Co:
recommendation.
The City Council directed staff to prepare the
revised resolution for formal approval on March 15th.
attached proposed resolution.
ACTION RS4IIIR8D
Review the proposed resolution, and pass a motion ;
Resolution No. 94- , A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITI(
PERMIT FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AND HFIGHT VARIANCES ;
IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ATHLETIC FACILITIES AT ST. THOMAS ACA]
�
Academy
�nces
Council
ire and
control
' V L/6ii i �
�ber of
in the
�ission
priate
se see
ing
USE
CITY OF' biENDOTA �EIGHTS
DAROTA COUN'�Y, MINNESOTA
RESOLIITION N0. 94-
A RESOLIITION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL IISE PERMIT FOR ACCESSORY
STRIICTURE �ND HEIGHT VARIANCES ALLO�ING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE
ATHLETIC FACILITIES AT STe THOMAS ACADEbiY
4PSEREAS, St. Thomas Academy has made application for a
Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Structure and Height Variances
to expand their existing football field by constructing a set of
concrete bleachers, a control room/press box and four seventy foot
high light standards, as proposed on site plans in Case File No.
94-04; and
WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission conducted a
public hearing on February 22, 1994 to review said application; and
WHEREAS, on February 22, 1994 the Planning Commission closed
the public hearing and voted unanimously (7-0) to recommend that
City Council approve a Conditional Use Permit and Height Variances
for Light Poles and Control Room, as proposed, with the following
conditiona:
1.
2.
That the applicant demonstrate 700 parking spaces through
existing parking and agree to a proof parking plan.
That all four lights be shielded and diffuged with appropriate
baffles, louvers or shields.
3. That the City Attorney opine to the effect that the facility
proposed is not a stadium within the meaning of Section
17.2(2) of the City's Zoning Ordinance having in mind that
Stadiums are specifically addressed in that section. If the
facility proposed by the applicant is deter�nined to be a
stadium that the applicants must return, if they wish to
proceed, with an application for rezoning and a conditional
use permit pursuant to Section 17.2(2).
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed said application for
Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Structure and Height Variances
for Light Poles and Control Room at their March 3, 1994 meeting;
and
Y�HEREAS, the City Council reviewed a Resolution of Approval
for said application at its March 15, 1994 meeting.
NOW THERSFORL =T =5 HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mendota Heights that a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory
Structure and Height Variances for Light Poles and Control Room to
allow construction of concrete bleachers, control room and light
poles are consistent with the general welfare of the citizens of
the community and the surrounding land; and
IBE ST FIIRTHER RRSOLVED that construction of said c
bleachers, control room and light poles is consistent w
general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance; and
BE IT FIIRTHER RESOLVED�that the City Council finds:
1. That the proposed project by St. Thomas Academy is an
of its existing athletic facility and falls witt
definition of an accessory atructure and is appro�
'classified as an accessory structure which could be aut
as a conditional use under the existing zoning; and
2. That the project is part of a larger plan which i
landscaping; and
3. That the topography and distance from surrounding resi
areas will be sufficient not to interfere with p
enjoyment of their own property.
BL =T FQRTHLR RESOLVED, that said Conditional Use Per
Accessory Structure and Height Variances for Light Po]
Control Room for St. Thomas Academy be approved with the fo
conditionsa
�
1. That St. Thomas Academy will not lease the facility fo�
an outside agency without prior approval of the City C
and
I
2. That in lieu of the required number of parking spa�
parking becomes a problem either for Visitation or nei
that St. Thomas will construct another parking
accommodated parking needs; and
I
3. That off-duty police officers will be retained as ne
for evening events and barricades will be placed on Lak
during varsity football games; and
4. That issuance of a building permit is subject to rev
approval of plans by the city's Code Enforcement Offi
Fire Marshal; and
�ncrete
.th the
n the
iately
orized
udes
e's
nit for
es and
L 1 owing
use by
uncil;
s, if
ibors ,
�t to
ssary
Drive
and
and
5. That the proj ect is part of an improvement plan at he St .
Thomas Academy campus that would also include the land caping
plan presented to City Council; and
6. That concessions will be provided by a leased mobile u
that at such time as a permanent structure is desir�
Thomas Academy will make application and appear bef�
Planning Commission and City Council; and
�
7. That St. Thomas Academy agree to diffuse, baffle or scr
offending lights, at the discretion of the City; and
�it and
d, St.
re the
:en any
8. That any future requests for signage will be subject to City
Council approval; and
9. That the light standards and attachments not exceed seventy
feet (70') in height; and
10: That the number of games to be held in the facility with the
use of lights be limited to 15 games per year.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this
15th day of March, 1994.
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles £. Mertensotto, Mayor
�
- LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY
March 15, 1994
Concrete License
Jesco Inc
Serice Construction Inc
Excavatinq License
Turner Excavating
Gas Piping License
Springborn Heating & A/C
Twin City Mechanical
General Contractors License
Du-All Services
S.E. Hanson Inc.
IiVAC License
. Marsh Heating & A/C
Springborn Heating & A/C
Twin City Mechanical
'' �
,
i
Ma rc
TO:
h 15, 1994
Mayor and City Council
LIST SUMMARY:
Total� Claims
ficant C1ai�
Collins Electric�
Hugh s & Costello
Mort n �ihokol
NSP
Trip Fuel
Claims
Davi Lagerma��
Wate► Pro
rprs
pros legal
salt
utilities
gas
Ivy Falls
Eq
43,354
1,640
2,883
1,734
9,440
2,799
1,350
2,670
r
�
\ �;
*
3����9. Dept 10 Adm Dept 50-Roads � r
10 Mar 1994 �l�ims List 15-Engr 6p-Utilities page 1
Thu 3:44 PM City af MeMdata Heights 2Q-Po3ice 70-Farks ' ,
�••, 30-Fi re 80-Pi anni ng �,
Te�np Check Nurnber i • 40-CEO 85-Recycling
' 90-Animal Control
, . Temp. °
Check �
Numher Vendar tJarne Rrcounb Cade Camments Arnount
1 A G Systems 01-4305-050-50 splys 105.�1 �
1 A G Systems Q11-4305-050-50 splys 8.58 ,
. i A� Systems 0f -�►305-Qt50-50 splys 15. 60 �
1 A G 5ysterns 01-4305-080-50 splys 7@,32
'� 200. 21 �,c�
Tatals Temp Check Number 1
Temp Check Numher 2 �
2 Rce Hardware 08-4335-00tb-@0 splys 8.80
� 8. 60 �
Tetals Temp Check Number 2
' ys Temp ChecFc hiutrtbe�^ 3 �
.��t 3 Airsi gnal Inc 01-4210-020-20 . tnar svc i5.78 _�, �, :�
'•• 3 Rirsignal Inc ibi-42f0-@30-30 mar svc 7.75 �.•-'
: ••3 6 - 23. 54 '
- Totais Ternp Check Number 3 1� '� �
i
. Temp Check Number 4 • �
4 American 7ao1 Supply Inc 01-43td5-070-70 , splys 52.94 '
- ' -----
' 4 52. �4 �
7oials Temp Check Number 4
Femp Eheck Number 5 �
. 5 American National Barik 31-4226-000-�0 bd fees 196.85 �
S Rmerican Nationa2 Bank 85-42�6-000-@Qa bd fees 183.30
. 10 � 380. 15
�' Totals Temp Checic tJumber 5 �
Temp Check Number 6 '
�
6 Dann Ar�derson 0f-440P�-@20-20 exp reimb 43.80 �
6 43. 80 �
a a s emp ec um er
Temp Check Number 7 �
7 H& J Auto �upply 01-43@5-030-30 splys 7,87 �
•• 7 Et & J Auto Supply 01-4305-050-50 splys 13.3?
�
' � �
;............. .. . ..------_._____._._..�_.
� .._.. .._ ____
\� f
10 Mar 1994 ` Claims l.ist Page � a �
Thu 3s45 PM City cf Mendota Heights „
Temp Check Number i • �
iemp.
Check �
Nurnber Vendar Narne Account Cade Cornraents Amour�t
7 B& J A�ito Supply Q1-4305-050-50 splys 46. �4 a
7 H& J Auto Supply 15-4305-060-6@ splys 26.3@ ,
28 93. 78 �
7otals Temp Check Number 7
Temp Check Number 8 . �
8�auer Built 0i-4330-�4Q+-�0 parts 20.�8
8 Bauer Built 01-4330-440-20 parts 9.67 �
8 Bauer Built 01-433@-494�-50 par�s � 39.13
_8 �suer Built 01-4,530-490-50 parts 28_45 �
32 97, ��
Totala Temp Check lVumber 8 �
Temp Check Number 9
9 Etoatmer�s Bar�eshares Inc Qil-2Q►72 mar prem 248.30 '�
9 Boatmens Harreshares Ina 01-4132-020-20 mar prem 113.88
9 Haatmens Bartcshares Ina 01-4132-050-50 mar prem 3@.90 �
9 BoatmeMs Baneshares Inc 25-�132-060-fs0 mar prem 30.90
36 323. 99 �
Tat�2s Temp Check Number 9
Ternp Check Number 10 � � �
10 Gity Mator 8upply 01-4305-@50-5@ parts 27.10
10 City Motor 5upply 01-4305-070-70 parts 27.10 �
1@ City Motar 5upply 25-4305-062�-to0 p�rts 27.15
10 City Motar Sttpply 0i-4330-460-30 parts 32.16
10 City Motor 5upply @1-4330-490-70 part� 117.69 �
1@ City Motor 5upply @1-4330-490-50 parts 54.92
60 286. 12 c�
Totals Terap Gheck Number iPJ
Temp Check Number li �
h
ii Ca3lins Electrical Co»st 01-4330-490-70 rprs 511.43
il Gollins Electricai Const 01-4330-490-50 rprs 170.5@ �
il Collins Electrical Const 01-4330-490-7@ � rprs 170.50 �
c r ca cns - - - r}srs I70.43
11 Collins Electrical Co»st 01-4330-490-70 rprs 288.50 �
11 Collins Electrical Const 01-4211-30�-50 rprs 328.25
66 1�6s9.61 �
Totals Temp Check Number 11
Temp Check Number 1� �
. i�C Copy Duplicsting Praducts 02-4305-0�0-50 splys 4.95
r �
- -... .. _ .
. _ . _ .. ___. ._-- - •- --- -... ....------- ----_.._M�.._
a�r�� r����l+�+�rl '��� � �rl��Irrrlw��rr�r�l u�rn r.��lrr�� -._..�_».�' _�r.�"""_' - ��_'�..���_
1t0 Mar 1994
Thu 3:45 FM
�Temp Check Number 12
Temp.
Check
Nu�ber Ve�dnr Name
12
• Totals Temp Check Nurnber
Temp Check lVumber 13
13 Caverall
13 Caverall
13 Coverall
39
Totals Temp Check Number
Temp Check Number 14
14 Custom Die Cuts
i4
7otals Temp Check Nurnber
Temp Check Number 15
15 Davis & Lagerman
15
Totais Temp Cheek Neernber
Temp Check Nurnber 16
16 Di�cam of Mn Inc
16
Tatals Temp Check Nurnber
Temp Gheck Number 17
f7 Electro Watchcnan
17
Tatais Tetnp Check l�tumber
Temp Check Number 18
18 First Imaressians _
" 18 First Impressians
18 Fit^st Irnpres�ians
18 First Irnpressians
18 Firsi Impressions
90
Tatais Temp Ct�eck 3tilusnber
. �
Clai,ms List
City of Mendata Neight�
Rccau»t Code
12
tri i -4335-32 �-50
01-4335-310-70
15-4335-310-60
13
01-44��-@S0-5Q
14
29-42�0-834-2t6
15
Idi-4330--44�-20
16
�8-4335-000-00
f7
E
t
Cotnment s
rnar svc
mar svc
mar svc
signs
re 2/23 court ivy falls
rprs
2nd qtr
Page 3
Amount
4. 95
6Q1. 00
6@. ��h
S9. 99
179. 99
8s4.40
$34. 40
1, 350. 00
1, 350. @0
73. 91
73. 91
159. 75
159,75
01-4268-650-85 spg nl 60.65 �
15-4268-650-Er0 spg »1 399.40
07-4868-650-00 � spg nl 20.70
21-4268-65�0-Qt0 spg nl 199.74 �
1, 479. 29
f8 �
�..�
' G
10 Mar 1994 Cl�ims List Page 4 `�
Thu 3:45 PM City of Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 19 , �
• Temp.
' Check �
Number Vendor Name Account Code Cornments , Arnount
19 W W Grainger 01-4305-@50-Sm 5piy� 85.28 .�
19 W W Grair�ger 01-4305-030-30 splys 44.41
, 19 W W Grainger 01-4305-050-5@ splys 206.51 �
57 ------ �
Totals Temp Check Number i9
336. 20
Temp Check Number Zm '�
20 Gopher St�te One Call 15-4210-@60-60 '� feb svc g,�0 �
20 ----
Totals Temp Check Number 20 9•�@ �
. Ternp Check Nurnber 21
�
21 Govt Training Svc @i-4400-040-40 spg sernir�ar 25.@0
21 25. 00 �
Totals Temp Check Number 21
Temp Check Number 22 �
, 22 Hdwe Hank 01-4305-07@-70 discount 9.89cr
22 Hdwe Hank 01-4305-030-30 splys 35.90 �
2Z Hdwe Hank 01-4305-030-30 splys Z,99
22 Hdwe Hank 01-4305-070-70 � splys 44.68
88 ----- �
Totals Temp Check Nurnber 22 73.68
Temp Check Number 23 `�
23 Hennepin Technic�l College 01-4400-030-30 regr 112.05 �
23 -----
Totals Temp Check Number z3
112. 05 �
Temp Check Number 24
4�
24 Hughes b Costello 01-4222-120-�0 ,7an prasecutions 2,882.98
24 --------
� Tota �s Temp-�Freck-Nurrtber —�c 2, &82. Qg �
Temp Check Number 2g �
25 I 0 S � 01-4330-490-10 mar rntcn 34.45
25 I O S 01-4330-460-30 mar mtcn 34.45 �
25 I O S 01-4330-445-40 mar rnten 34.45
�
��
- r.... - -•---------.�_..__ __-----•------• ;--- — --�------
10 `Mar 1994
Th u 3: 45 PM
Temp Check Number 25
Ternp.
Che�k
Number Vendar Narne
25IOS
25I OS
25 I O S
25I OS
25I OS
25I OS
25I OS
25I OS
2S I 0 S
300
Totals Temp Check Number
Temp Check Number 26
26 I O S
26IOS
26 Q 0 S
78
Totals Temp Check Number
Temp Check Number 27
27 Identi Kit co
27
Totals Temp Check Number
Temp Check Nurnber Zg
28 Inver Grove Ford
28 Inver Grove Ford
5b
Totals Temp Check Number
Temp Check Number 29
29 I S D 197
29
Totals Temp Check Number
Temp Check Nurnber 30
Claims List
City of Mendota Heights
Account Code
01-4330-490-50
01-4330-49@-70
15-4330-490-60
05-4330-490-15
01-430@-080-80
01-43@0-08@-80
01-4300-I 1•0-10
01-4300-030-3@
01-430Qi�40-40
25
01-4300-080-80
05-4300-105-15
15-4300-0fi0-6@
26
01-440@-020-20
27
01-4330-46@-30
01-4330-460-30
28
01-4435-2@@-70
29
Comments
mar mtcn
mar rntcn
mar mtcn
mar rnten
mar mten
toner
toner
toner
toner
toner
toner
toner
qtrly kit
parts 2280
parts 2280
eq rent
Page 5
Arnount
34. 45
34. 45
34. 45
34. 45
34.48
57. 90
115. 80
57. 90
86.80
594.03
57. 90
115. 80
86.75
26@. 45
1 @2. 00
1@2. @0
15. 71
9. 31
25. @2
15. 00
15. 00
30 Kar Products 01-4330-44@-20 parts 166.80 �
30 Kar Products 01-4330-460-30 parts 166.8@
' 30 Kar Groducts 01-4330-490-50 p�rts 166.85 '�
3@ Kar Products 01-433m-490-70 parts 166.85
.e�
� ��
� ' - • - .__._--•----.____�__�._�� _.__._.._ .._..
� . ..
___._.---�-•-•-_•------._ ....--
.- r. .�.;'-'_--' -'---
10 Mar 1994 ` Clairn5 List P�H� 6 �
��u �:45 Q� City of Mendata Heights .
�
Temp Gheck Num6er 3@ '
� Temp.
Check
tJumber VendGr iVarne Account Code Comments Amaunt
3Qs Kar Rraducts 15-4a30-496-50 parts 166.86 �
3Q+ Kar PrQducts Qs1-4330-494�-50 parts 65.75
� 280 899.91 �
Totalg Temp Check Nurnber 30
�
Temp Check Nurdber 31
31 Kat Keys 01-43@5-0�0-50 splys 86.13 �
32 Kat Keys 02-4.s05-050-50 splys 4i.34
fi� 127. 47 �
Totals Temp Check Number 31
• 7emp Chec3c Number 32 �
3� Knox Cornmeraial Gredit @1-433�-490-50 SPLYS � 1@.10
32 Krrox Garnmercial Credit �Br-4330-490-50 BPt,.YS 35.44 ,�
32 Knox Cornrnercial Credit 01-4330-49@-50 BRLYS 8,34 .
32 Knox Catnrnercial Credit 01-4330-490-70 BPLYS 29.65
' 126 83.53 �
Tatals Ternp �eck Number 32
. �
� ` 7emp Check Nurnber 33
33 League of Mn Cities 01-P@74 ' MAR FREM 62Q1.24 �
33 League of Mn Cities 01-4131-Q�20-20 mar prern 868.45
. 66 1,488.69 �
iat�ls Temp Check Number s3 .
f. Temp Check Number 34 �
34 Lagerquist Gorp 08-4335-000-@0 roar svc 9@.50 .
34 gm' �'� �
Totals Temp Check Number 34
�
Temp Check Number 35
3� League Mn Gities 05-4400-i@5-15 wkshp 15.00 �
35 �c-�ague Mn Cities 01-4400-f 20-10 wkshp 45.00
�S _i d��,a-pq r,�-.n_„z�+: �.,5 v,'� - :�00-@'�"E�-2 •
i Q;5 1 �fi. 00 �
7otals Temp Chieck Number 35
�i
Temp Check Nurn6er 36
36 Leef Bros 01-4335-31Qa-50 feb svc 16.Q@ �
�
�
10 Mar 1994 Claims l.ist Page 7
Thu 3e45 Phi City of Menduta tiei.ghts _
Temp Check Number 36 ' �
Temp.
Check �'
Number Vendor Name Recount Code Camments Amaunt
36 �eef Sras 01-4335-310-70 feb svc 16.00 �
36 Leef Hros 15-4335-310-60 feb svc 15.99
108 47. 99 �
Totals Temp Check Number 36
Temp Check Nurnber a7 � �
37 Lillie Suburban News � 05-4240-iQ+5-iS ernpl ad 129.80 �
37 119. 60
Tatais Temp Gheck iVumber 3? �
Temp Check Nurnber 38
38 Mac Queen @1-4330-490-50 p�rts 242.62 , �
38 Mec Queen 01-4330-490-50 parts 452.31
39 M�c Queera Qti-4330-490-50 parts 27.37 �
38 Mac Qu�en 02-433td-4'30-50 parts 39.1'7
38 Mac Queen 01-433@-490-50 parts 485.64
190 . 1 y z47. 31 �
Totals Ternp Cheak Number 38 •
Temp Check i+lurnber 39 �
39 Mac Warehouse 01-4300-020-�C0 ' ' splys 42.00 �
39 42. 00
Totals Temp Check Number 39 �
Temp Check tVumber 40
40 Michael 1Y}aczk� Q+2-44710-@7tII-70 bal 94 allaw 33.3^c �
40 33. 3�C �
Totals Ternp Check Number 40
Temp Check Number 41 ' �
41 Minn Bearing Co 01-4330-490--70 parts 13.63
41 13. 63 �
"'-'�-� �:�—�tnp-�heck-ldum
Temp Check Num6er 4� , �
42 Mendota Heights Rubbish' 01-428@-31@-50 feb svc 48.55 �
42 Mendota Heights Rubbish' 01-4280-310-7@ feb svc 48.55
42 Mendota Heights Rubbi�h� 15-4c80-32Q�-60 feb svc 48.60
. �
1
10 Mar 1994 Claims List Page 6
Thu 3:45 PM Gity af Mend�ta Neights -
Temp Check Number 42 ' r
iernp. .-
Check
Number Vendar Narne Rccount Code Cornments Amount
r
42 Mendota Heights Ru6ba,sh' 01-4280-s15-30 feb svc, 43.08 '
i68 188.78 �
Totals Ternp Check Number 4�C
Temp Check Number 43 �
43 Metro Waste Control 15-4448-@6Qr60 feb sac chgs 1,6�0.00
43 Met�^a Waste Contral i5-36f5 feb sec chgs ___f6.0@c�^ .:�
86 1?584.00
Totals Terrsp Gheek Number 43 ,�
Temp Check Number 44
44 Midwest Phnto Svc 01-43f�5-02rD-20 feb svc 44.64 "�
44 44. 64 •'�
Tatals Ternp Check Number 44
Temp Check Nurnher 45 .�
45 Midwest Siren Service 07-4330-000-00 mar contr 62.40
45 62. 40 �
Tata].s Temp Check Nurnber 45 .
Temp Check I�iamber 46 , �
46 Midwest Radiator 01-4330-46Q�-30 p�rts �242 268s?6 �
46 168. 76
Totals Ternp Check Number 45 �
Temp Check Nurnber 47
47 Minn Celiular Tele Go �+1-4c3.@-@3�-3@ feb svc 21.20 ��
47 21. 20 ,�
Tatala Temp Etieck Number 4?
Temp Check Nurnber k8 .�J
ann ep o evenue 02-4320-050-50 feb fuel t�x 102.80
Q R�
�� 1��R i:i� -
Totals Temp Check Number 48
Temp Check Number 49 . '�
49 Minn Pallutian Gantral Agcy 01-4490-02@-2@ veh insp fee 32.00 �
�
10 Mar 1994 ` Claims �ist
ihu 3:45 PM City oF Mendata Neights
�...,
" Temp Check Number 49
• � 3emp.
Check
Nurnber Vendar Name Account Cade
Comment�
Page 9
Rmoant
49 Minn Poliution Cantrol Agcy 01-4490-030-30 veh insp fee 8.00 �
49 Minn Pollution Contral Agcy 01-4490-Qu0-5@ veh insp fee 24.@@
49 MiMn pollution Control Agcy 01-449P1-07'0-70 veh insp fee 24.00 ' �i
49 Minn Pollution Contral Agcy 15-4490-@62�-60 veh insp fee 8.00
245 9b. 00 �
Totals Temp Check iVumber 49
Ternp Check IVumber 50 . �
50 Mn Chiefs af Palice Assn 01-43@0-020-20 permit 1.07
50 , .. 1. 07 �
Totals Temp Check Number 50
'Femp Check Nuwber 51 �
51 Minn Palice � Peace Offc As�n 2+1-4404-02Q+-20 94 deees 150,00 �
, 51 150.00
Totals Temp Check Number 51 �
Ternp Check fVumber 5C
' S2 Minnesot� Teamsters i.oc 32� Ql1-20'75 . rnar dues C73.00 �
52 ' � 273,@0 �
iotals Temp Check Number 52
Temp Check Number 53 Q
53 Minnesota Toro Inc 0i-4330-490-70 parts 48.10 .
_53 Minne�ota Toro Inc 01-4400-070-70 regr mti univ 450^00 �
106 � 498. 10
Totals Temp Check Number 53 �
Terop Checit Number S4
54 Miss 5treet Metals 01-4305-050-50 splys 58.67 �
54 58. B7 �
Tatals Temp Check Number 54
Temp Check Number 55
L•�..
55 Mor�on Thakol 01-44�l-05Q)-�0 safe t salt 1,734.10
55 • i � 734. 10 �
Tatals iemp Checic Number 55
• Temp Check Nurnber 55 '^�
' � � .._ _" . _.....'_ _...�_ ..- -�._....�._".. . _.J
. , . .»
20 Mar 1994 Claims List ` Rage 10 '�'�
Thu 3:45 PM City af Mendata Neigh�s
�
Temp Check Number 56 '
Temp. Q
Check
Number Vendar Narne Accaunt Code Cornments Amaunt
56 N O I 5 E 01-449Qs-080-80 94 dues 385•00 �
56 385.00 . �
7otals Temp Check Number 56
Temp Check Nurober 57 �
B� Northwestern Aggregate 01-4k�C1-050-50 ice rock 1,048.4�0
57 iVorthwestern Rggregate 02-44zf-050-50 ice rock 230.4k �
114 1,276.84
Tota�s Temp ChQek Number 57 �
Temp Check Number 58
58 Narthern 01-4330-490-70 splys 109.6'7 �"
58 Northern 01-43@5-050-50 splys 266.13
58 Narthern Q1-430.�r-070-70 splys 10T.52 �
174 383. 32
Totals Temp Check Number 58 � �
Temp Gheck Num6er 59
59 Northern State Pawer 01-4212-315-30 mar svc 716.39 �
59 Narthern Sta�Ge Power 01-421�-310--50 . mar svc 1,124.iB
59 Northern State Fawer 01-4212-310-70 ' mar svc 1,124.iB �
59 Narthern State Power 15-42i2-320-641 mar svc f,f24.15
59 Narthern State Rawer 01-4212-320-70 mar svc 332.87
59 Nortfiern State Power 15-421�-400-60 mar svc 30.04 �
5�3 Northern 5tate Pawer Q+8-4�i2-00tL�-@0� rnar sve 1, 120. E5
59 Northern State Pawer 01-4211-310-50 mar svc 296•S5
59 tJorthern State Pawer 0i-42i1-31¢�-70 mar svc �g�+•5� �
� 59 1+4orthern State Power 15-4�11-37.@-6td mar sve �96.54
59 Narthern 5tate Pawer 28-4211-00@-00 mar svc 79'7.57
59 t+Iarthern 8tate Pawer 81-4821-300-50 mar svc 421.89 �
708 7,680.12
Total� Temp Check Nurober 59 y�
Temp Gheck Number 60
60 Narthern State Rawer 01-4211-4E0-50 mar svc 156.6@� �
60 IVarthern State Rower 08-4221-000-00
orthern State Fawer 15-4211-400-60 rnar svc 4$�•�� �
60 Northern State Pawer 01-4211-3�0-70 mar svc 359.84
Z40 1 � 760. 2"�c �
Total� Ternp Check IVumber 60
Temp Gheck Number 61 Q
61 Oakerest Kenne2s 01-4221-800-90 feb sve 75.00
�
� i � �
ifd Mar 1994 Ciaims List Page 11
Thu 3t45 PM City cf Mendata Heights
Temp Ch�ek Number 6f �
� Temp. � '`
Check
Nuraber Vendcar Name Account Code Gornments Amount
r
6f Oakcrest Kennels @1-42�5-800-90 feb svc 134.i8
222 209.18 ' :;"�
� Tota3s Temp Check lVumber 61
Temp Check Number 62 !�
62 Oxygen Serviae Co 0B-4335-00�-2�0 act thru 2/28 13.Sm
� 62 Oxygen Service Ga 01-4305-Fi30-30 act thru 2I28 33.50 �
124 27.@0 �
7otals Temp Check Nurnber 62
�
Temp Check Number 63
� 63 Pedersan 5ells Eq 01-4330-490-50 splys 133.48 �
63 ' 133.48 s�
Totals Temp Check Number 63
� Temp Check IVumber 64 �
64 Rublic Empl Ret Assn ai-2Q�74 apr prem 60.�0
64 Public Empl Ftet Assn 01-4131-110-10- apr prem 9.00 �
b4 Rublic �mpl Ret Rssn . 0i-413i-02@-2¢� apr prern 12.00
192 ' 81. 00 ,,�,�
Totais Temp Checic IVumber 64
Temp Check Nurnber f5
�•
65 Quad State Rural Enfc ?ask Fc 01-44q0-080-20 regr 6@.00
' �,� 60.00 �
Totals Temp Check Number 65
Temp Check Number 66
�
66 Ratmer 5tee1 Sp2y 0i-43Q5-050-.�.�0 splys 80,94 �
, �6 8@.94
icstals Temp Check IUumber 65 ;,�
Temp Check tVurnber Er7
67 St Jaseph Eq 01-4330-490-50 parts . 102.65 �
67 IO2. 65 �
Totals Temp Check Number 67
Temp Check Nurnber 68 �
68 Shals Auto E]ectric @2-4330-490-�0 rprs 40.95
.a
..
,. . � r. � ».. . «.,. ._ . . .._, .. . ._ .. _._..._' _'__' ' .
t � � �..
10 Mar 1994 Claims List Page 12 "
Thu 3:45 PM City of Mendota Heights �
i �n, .
Temp Check Number 68 .
. Temp.
' Check �
Number Vendar Narne Account Code Carnments Amount "
; ...y
68 ----- �
�>, Totals Temp Check Number 68 40.95
Temp Check Number 69 ' �
69 Spectrurn Business Systeras @5-4301-105-15 eq 500.00 �
69 Spectrum Business Systems 15-4220-133-60 eq 250.00
69 Spectrum Husiness Systens 01-4330-490-10 eq 768.38 �
69 Spectrum Business Systems 15-4330-490-60 svc file rnaker 180.00
69 Spectrurn Husiness Systems 01-4330-490-10 rprs 288,gg
. 69 Spectrum Business Systems 15-4330-490-60 rprs 219.50 �
69 Spectrurn Business Systems 01-4330-490-10 rprs 161.18
;;. 483 2� 368. @4 �
Totals Temp Check Number 69
t,j. Temp Check Number 70
70 St Paul Stamp Works 01-4490-110-10 hauler lic 375.47 �
"•�
7� 375. 47 �
Totals Temp Check tVumber 70
Temp Check Number 71 , �
-, 71 Tapco 01-4420-050-50 `' � signs 211.29
71 211.29 �
, Totals Temp Check Number 71
Temp Check Number 72 �
'� 72 T I E Systerns 01-4330-44@-20 rprs gg, �m Q
72 95. 00 �
Totals Temp Check Number 72
Temp Check Nurnber 73
73 Trophy Ho��se 01-4490-11@-10 splys 71.36 a
73 71. 36 9
Totals Temp Check Nureber 73
Ternp Check Nurnber 74 �
74 Tracy Tripp Fuels 01-1210 fuel 2�798.74 �
74 -------
, Totals Temp Check Number 74
2� 798. 74
. �
• . . ..._-f••-------_... . _. ____.._._ _._...___. ._.._.---------�---_-.___M_.__... . --� _ . .r—,. ---� �
i
F
F
10 Mar 1994 ` Claims List Page 13 • � �'�
Thu 3:45 PM City of Mendata Heights
Temp Check Numher 75 • � �
�� Temp. `
Check �
Number Vendar Name Account Code Cornments Amaunt
75 Uniforms tln2imited 01-4410-020-20 splys 1�217.16 �
, 75 Iz2i7.26 , �
Tatals Temp Check tVumber 75
Temp Check Nutnber 76 .*�
76 Viking Elertrric Sply 01-4308-050-50 splys 43.69
76 43. 69 �
Totals Temp Check Number 76
Temp Check I+ictmber 7'T �
77 Water Rro 15-2010 eq 2�670.AS �
77 2, 67@. 45
7otals Temp Check Number 77 �
Temp Check Number 78
� 78 R� Whitace � Co 01-4420-050-5� splys 49.E9 �
78 49. C9 �
'iata2s Temp Check Number 78
Temp Check Nurnber 79 � �
79 Zee Medical Svc @8-4335-000-00 splys � 8.57
79 8. S7 �
Totals Temp Check Number 79 •
•� Temp Check Number 80 �
80 Ziegler Inc 01-4330-490-50 rpr parts 258.19
-- ----- �
8@ 258. 19
Tatals Temp Check Number 80 �
6674 43,353.68 �
6rand Total
�
�
t��i
� ��
. *
�
. ; ,. , ,— =
�.,1
. �,
MANtlAL CHECKS �
14593 243.00 Deputy Reg9strar license tabs
2454� 3�a.00. Renee Sore��son skating 9essons i�
14595 150.00 Minn�Dept'Health plan review
14596 . 48.U0 Dennis Delmont� •• exp reimb�
'� 14597 36.00 Minn Urbank Tfc regr ' �
14598 2,518.14 State'Capitol C U 3/4 payroll
14600 40.00 ASOA ' regr
14601 8,276.41 PERA 3j� payrotl �
14602 ]:3.84
14603 780.82 •ICMA RT "
14604. � b88.04 Minn Mu�uai �� �
i4605 410.00 Minn State Retirement
14606 256.80 Ddkota'County' ' ' "
14647 ' 475.00 D1k4td COUitty Bdqk " �
14608 14',646.62 . . " . "
14609 . 3,398.35 Comnissionet^.Revenue "
14610 44,940.19 Payrolt ac�ount " �
.. . _._-_......_..,:_
77,165.77 �'
G.T. 120,5�9.65
.. • • _. • �
. �
' �
. �i
ar
�►
�
�
�►
�
�
. . ,�.
� �,...:
�� a
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
March 11, 1994
T0: Mayor, City Council and City Administr
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DISCIISSION
Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer
Lexington Heights Apartment Financing
At the Council meeting of January lSth, the Council
public hearing for the refinancing of the Housing Revenue
the Lexington Heighta Apartments.
At our January iSth meeting, the Council adopted a pre:
resolution approving the refunding and authorized a Joint
Agreement with Maple Grove to include bonds of a Mapl
project into a single Mendota Heights issue. Mr. Ri
deposited with the City a$2,500 expense escrow, and will b�
for an issuance fee of approximately $20,000 on closing
refunding issue.
Mr. Riley will be present at the hearing to
questions regarding the project.
A�TION RE4IIIRED
Conduct a public hearing, close the hearing and at
staff to place approval of the final documents on the
agenda as soon as they are prepared.
LES:kkb
�
�
led a
.s for
Powers
Grove
ey has
liable
of the
any
rize
ncil
�
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIII�NARY APPROVAL TO TI�
ISSUANCE OF BONDS TO REFUND TI� CITY OF MENDOTA
HEIGHTS, D�TNESOTA, MULT'1FAMII.Y HOUSING REVENUE
REFUNDING BONDS (LEXINGTON HEIGATS APARTMENTS
PROJECI� SERIE.S 1991A AND SERIFS 1991B AND TO REFUND
TI� CITY OF MAPLE GROVE, MINNESOTA, MULT�ANIILY
HOUSING REVENLTE REFUNDING BONDS (EAGLE RIDGE
APARTMENTS PROJECT� SERIES 1991A AND SERIES 1991B
AND APPROVING E,NTERING INTO A JOINT POWERS
AGREEMENT WITH TI� CITY OF MAPLE GROVE,
MINNESOTA, TO AUTHORIZE THE ISSUANCE OF
REFUNDING BONDS ON ITS BEHALF.
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights ("Mendota Heights") and the City of Maple Grove
("Maple Grove") (collectively, the "Prior Issuer") each adopted a Program pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, chapters 462C and 475 as amended, (collectively, the "Act"), which Act authorizes cities to
issue revenue bonds and use the proceeds thereof for the purpose of developing and administering
programs of making or purchasing loans to finance multifamily housing developments affordable to
persons and families of low and moderate income and to issue bonds to refund such bonds previously
issued; and
WHEREAS, Mendota Heights, pursuant to the Program (as defined in the Act) adopted by it,
issued its Housing Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Lexington Heights Apartments Project) Series 1983 (the
"1983 Lexington Bonds") in the aggregate principal amount of �11,000,000, dated December 1, 1983,
the proceeds of which were loaned by Mendota Heights to Lexington Heights Associates Limited
Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership ("Lexington") to finance the cost of acquisition and
construction of a 255-unit multifamily rental housing facility (the "Lexington Heights Project"); and
WHEREAS, Maple Grove adopted a Program (as defined in the Act) under which it issued its
$11,000,000 Housing Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Eagle Ridge Apartments Project) Series 1983 (the "1983
Eagle Ridge Bonds") dated December 1, 1983, the proceeds of which were loaned by Maple Grove to
Eagle Lake Associates Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited parinership ("Eagle") to finance the cost
of acquisition and construction of a 240-unit multifamily rental housing facility (the "Eagle Ridge
Project"); and
WHEREAS, Mendota Heights has previously issued its Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Lexington Heights Apartments Project) Series 1991A and Series 1991B (the "Lexington Heights
Prior Bonds") and Maple Grove has previously issued its Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Eagle Ridge Apartments Project) Series 1991A and Series 1991B (the "Eagle Ridge Prior Bonds")
(collectively, the "Prior Bonds"); and
WHEREAS, Mendota Heights issued the Lexington Heights Prior Bonds in the aggregate
principal amount of $11,000,000, the procee�is of which were used to refund the 1983 Lexington Bonds;
and
WHEREAS, Maple Grove issued the Eagte Ridge Prior Bonds in the aggregate pri
of $11,000,000, the proceeds of which were used to refund the 1983 Fagle Ridge Bonds;
WHEREAS, Mendota Heights is authorized pursuant to the Act and Minnesota
471.59, as amende�i, ttf euter into a joint pciwers agreemerrt and, pursuant thereto, ta
bonds for the Eagle Ridge Prior Bonds previously issued by the City of Maple Grove; ;
aznount
s, sectian
refunding
WHEREAS, Lexingtan and Eagle Ridge, in order to reduce the autstanding princip amount af
th$ Priar Bonds and to change the interest rate there�n from a floating rate io f�ced rates h ve graposed
that Mendota Heights issue its revenue bonds or notes in the appraximate aggregate princip amaunt of
$22,000,000, but nai to exceed the outstanding principat amount af the Prior Bonds, for th purposa of
refunding the Prior Bonds in whole; and
WHEREAS, Mendota Hei�hhts shall not be liable on the Bonds, defined below, a
shall not be a debt of Meadota Heights within the meaning of any state constitutional
statutory Iimitation, and wiit not constitute or give rise to a charge against the general cr
power of Mendota Heights or a pecuniary liability of Mendota Heights, nor shall the Bon�
aut of any funds or properties other those than provided as security therefor; and
WHEREAS, L6XiilgtpA and Eagie Ridge have praposed that Mendota He
Multifatnily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (Lexington Heights Apartments Project)
amount aot to exceed $11,0(}t},000 {the "S�T1�S A BOIl{�S"}; and
the Bonds
rovisian or
it or taxing
be gayable
issue its
A, in an
�i�FIEREAS, to authorize Mendota FIeights to exercise certain powers an behaif of aple Grove
Lexington and Eagle Ridge have pmposed that Maple Grove and Mendota Heights enter into a joint
powers agreement, which agreement will altow Mendota xeights to issue, oa behalf af Map Grave, its
Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (Eagle Ridge Apartments Project) Series B, flt to exceed
$11,Q40,QQ0 {the "Series B Bands"); and '
WFiEREAS, the Series A Bonds and the Series B Bands aze hereinaftsr callectivel� referred to
as the "Bonds"; and
WHEREAS, there has been prepared and presented ta this City Councii a form of T int Powers .
Agreement (the "Joint Powers Agreement"), which Agreement will allow MenQota Heights to exercise
ait powers on behaif of Mapie Grove necessary to issae the Series B Bonds; and
WHEREAS, in arder ta compIy with #he requirements of the Act aad of section 131 of the Tax
Reform Act of 1986 and section 147(� af the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amend , the City
Councii propases to hotd a public hearing on March 15, 1994, after pub2icarion of notice ereof in a
newspaper of general circulatian in the City of Mendota Heights at least fourteen days before e hearing;
and
W�IEREAS, it is necessary and proper at this time that Mendota Heights {a} a'tharize the
execution and delivery af the 7oint Pawers Agreement and (b) autharize the issuance of the Bonds and
the appIication of the proceeds thereaf to the refunding of the Prior Bonds;
NOVY THEREFORE BE IT RESQLVED, by the City Council of Mendata Heights,
1. The form of the Joint Powers Agreement is aggroved, with such changes
inconsistent with this Resoiutian and not materially adverse to Mendota Heights, as may be
failows:
not
iby
the Act and approved by the officers executing the same on behalf of Mendota Heights. The Mayor and
the Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute, attest, and deliver the 7oint Powers Agreement.
All of the provisions of the Joint Powers Agreement, when executed and delivered as authorized herein,
shall be deemed to be a part of this Resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated verbatim
herein and shall be in full force and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof.
2. Mendota Heights hereby gives preliminary approval to the issuance of the Bonds.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the adoption of this resolution shall not be deemed to establish
a legal obligation on the part of Mendota Heights or its council to issue or cause the issuance of the
Bonds, and Mendota Heights and its Council retain the right not to issue such bonds or to issue the bonds
in an amount less than refened to above, should Mendota Heights or its Council, at any time prior to the
issuance thereof, determine that it is in the best interests of Mendota Heights not to issue the bonds or
to issue the bonds in an amount less than set forth above.
3. Lexington and Eagle Ridge have agreed to pay directly or through Mendota Heights any
and all costs incuned by Mendota Heights in connection with the Bonds whether or not the Bonds are
issued by Mendota Heights.
4. All commitrnents of Mendota Heights expressed herein are subject to the condition that
Mendota Heights, Lexington Heights, and Eagle Ridge shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms
and conditions of a loan agreement, the Bonds, and of the other instruments and proceedings relating to
the Bonds, that the public hearing be held on March 15, 1994, after publication of notice thereof in a
newspaper of general circulation in Mendota Heights at least fourteen days before the hearing, and that
the closing of the issuance and sale of the Bonds shall have occurred by no later than January 18, 1995.
If the events set forth herein do not take place within the time set forth above, or any extension thereof,
and the Bonds are not sold within such time, the preliminary approval herein of the Bonds shall expire
and be of no further effect.
5. For the purpose of financing a portion of the cost of refunding the Prior Bonds, there is
hereby authorized the issuance of not to exceed $11,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Series A
Bonds and not w exceed $11,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Series B Bonds. The bonds shall
be issued in fully registered form, shall be in such denominations, shall bear interest, shall be numbered,
shall be dated, shall mature, shall be in such form and shall have such other details and provisions as are
prescribed by the Indenture.
6. The Mayor, Clerk and other officials of Mendota Heights aze hereby authorized to
execute and deliver such other agreements, certificates or instruments, approved by legal counsel to
Mendota Heights, as may be reasonably necessary or desirable to implement the matters approved hereby,
the execution of such agreements, certificates or instruments being conclusive evidence of such approval.
Adopted: , 1994
ATTEST:
Clerk
�-�.-� �
Mayor
� r • � �� � � ��
authorizing the
CITY OF hZENDCITA HEIGHTS,
to exercise certain powers on behalf of
TI� CITY OF MAPLE GROVE, MIIVNESOTA
Dated: , 1994
�
JOINT POWERS AGA�:EMENT
THIS JOINT POWERS AG1tFF�N'i' is entered into as of the _ day of ,
1994, by and between the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota ("Mendota Heights"), a
municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and the City of Maple
Grove, Minnesota ("Maple Grove"), a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the
State of Minnesota (together, the "Cities"), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, chapters 462C and
475 and Minnesota Statutes, section 471.59
L S�t�ment of Purpose and Powers to be Exercised. There is a need in both
Mendota Heights and Maple Grove to preserve the quality of life through the maintenance,
provision and preservation of adequate housing stock, to encourage new housing construction
and the rehabilitation of substandard structures, to provide in a timely fashion affordable housing
primarily to persons of low and moderate income who are unable to afford housing at current
market interest rates or to obtain housing financing because of the severely restricted mortgage
credit market and to provide financing to providers of residential housing at rents and interest
rates which permit the development or rehabilitation of housing at costs affordable to persons
of low and moderate income. In order to promote the public health, welfare and prosperity,
Maple Gmve and Mendota Heights have each undertaken a pmgram of providing below market
interest rate mortgage loans to the ovcmers of the rental housing projects described herein (the
"Projects") upon terms and conditions not otherwise generally available to such persons in the
private market (the "Programs") through the issuance by the Cities of multifamily housing
revenue bonds.
The powers to be exercised under this Agreement are the powers conferred upon the
Cities in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 462C and 475, and the powers now or hereafter confened
upon the Cities under any general or special law of the State of Minnesota, and in particular,
but without limitation, the (i) power to undertake financing programs to implement individual
components of the housing plans developed by and for the Cities pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
chapter 462C, and to issue revenue bonds to finance such programs and to issue refunding bonds
for such bonds previously issued, and (u) the power to issue revenue bonds and refunding bonds
for such bonds previously issued and to use the procceds thereof to carry out the powers
confened upon either of the Cities by any general or special law heretofore or hereafter enacted
and approved.
,ro:aao�a
2. Method by Achievin� Pur�; Manner of Exercisin� Power. Purs
approval and consent of Maple Grove, provided by its resolution evidencing it
undertake the Program, and evidenced by its acknowledgment and acceptance of this
below, Mendota Heights shall exercise on behalf of Maple Grove the powers of M�
under Minnesota Statutes, chapters 462C and 475 or any related special law.
Mendota Heights in canying out the terms of this Agreement shall have the sa
except as provided herein, subject to the same conditions and limitations which woi
the powers enumerated above, including the power to issue the bonds or obliga�
exercised by Maple Grove and for that purpose any reference to any statute, law
provisions authorizing the exercise of said powers or authorizing the issuance of b
Minnesota Statutes, chapters 462C and 475 or any general or special law shall be G
reference to Mendota Heights. Accordingly, Mendota Heights shall have the pow
such regulations or resolutions, and to enter into such documents, and agreement
necessary or convenient to exercise such powers and to issue and sell revenuE
obligations, and such other resolutions, documents and agreements as shall be nE
convenient to properly manage, administer and operate the projects or programs u
proceeds of such bonds or obligations and such other funds as may be made availa
in conjunction with the Projects and Programs.
nt to the
intent to
Grove
e powers,
d apply if
�ns, were
►r chapter
nds under
isidered a
� to adopt
� shall be
bonds or
essary or
lizing the
�e for use
The Programs shall be managed, administered and operated in the manne provided
herein and in the documents related thereto. Except as otherwise provided herein Mendota
Heights may act singularly, without any consent by or action of Maple Grove, with respect to
the administration of the Programs to the extent provided in the related documents.
3. Limitations on the Powers of Mendota Hei h�ts. The powers of
Heights shall be limited as follows:
(a) Mendota Heights shall not undertake to issue bonds or oblig�
this Agreement until and unless Maple Grove has approved the financing program
in Chapter 462C and adopted a resolution or resolutions authorizing Mendota
undertake the financing program by the issuance of bonds or obligations.
(b) Mendota Heights may not pledge the full faith and credit or
of Maple Grove for any purpose whatsoever.
Mendota
ins under
provided
eiehts to
power
(c) The bonds or obligations shall be issued in conformance with the
provisions of Chapter 462C or any other applicable general or specifi law, as
appropriate.
4. �efinitions. In this Agreement, unless a different meaning clearly
the context, the following terms shall have the following respective meanings:
Bon : any bonds or other obligations issued by Mendota Heights in
of its powers granted hereunder including without limitation long term fixed-rate o
refund Series 1991A and Series 1991B Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding F
2
from
exercise
ations to
s (Eagle
Ridge Apartments Project) and Series 1991A and Series 1991B Multifamily Housing Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Lexington �%ights Apartments Project); such bonds or obligations may be
issued on a parity with and as part of a series of bonds the proceeds of which are to be used for
other programs of Mendota Heights, and such bonds or obligations may be issued, for any
particulaz series, in the form of a single debt instrument, or upon such terms and conditions,
consistent with this Agreement, as Mendota Heights shall deem appropriate;
1Vlaple Grove: the City of Maple Grove, Minnesota, its successors and assigns.
�.Viendota Hei h�ts: the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota and its successors and
assigns;
Program: a housing finance program pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, chapter 462C or
any other general or specific law, approved by Mendota Heights for an appmximately 225 unit
residential rental housing facility owned by Lexington Heights Associates Limited Partnership,
and approved by Maple Grove for an approximately 240 unit residential housing facility owned
by Eagle Lake Associates Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership and pursuant to
which the proceeds of a series of Bonds shall be used to f�nance the purposes of the Program;
Project: any residential housing project or development within Maple Grove authorized
under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C or any other general or special law to be financed from
the proceeds of one or more series of Bonds.
5. Source and Contribution of Funds. The source of funds for the Program
undertaken by Mendota Heights pursuant to this Agreement shall he the proceetls of the Bonds
and such other properties and revenues as shall be loaned or contributed to or derived from a
Program.
6. B�dQet and Disbursements. Mendota Heights may, but need not, require an
annual budget for itself or for any Project or Program. Moneys and funds shall be held,
applied, disbursed, and accounted for as set forth in the documents, agreements or instruments
relating to each Project or Program or in such manner not inconsistent with such documents,
agreements or instruments as Mendota Heights may determine.
7. Liability for Debts and �Obli ag tions. Mendota Heights shall not do any act or
thing the effect of which is to create a charge on or lien against the property or revenues of
Maple Grove, other than the revenues of a Program or Project financed by Bonds issued by
Mendota Heights and then only to the extent required by or not inconsistent with the indenture
of trust or other instrument or resolution entered into by Mendota Heights in connection with
the issuance of the Bonds.
The Bonds shall be special, limited obligations of Mendota Heights payable solely from
proceeds, revenues and other amounts pledged thereto, as more fully described in the indenture
of trust or other instrument or resolution relating thereto. The Bonds and the interest thereon
shall neither constitute nor give rise to an indebtedness, pecuniary liability, general or moral
obligation or a pledge of the full faith or credit of Mendota Heights, Maple Grove, the State
3
Minnesota or any political subdivision of the above, within the meaning of any
or statutory provisions.
8. �epresentation. Maple Gmve hereby represents to Mendota Heigh that it will
undertake any and all actions necessary or desirable to assure the validity and enfo ceability of
the Bonds, and to assure and preserve the tax exempt status of the Bonds, or as may be required
to enforce the requirements of federal or Minnesota law applicable to the Project.
9. Term of A�reement: Termination. This Agreement may be
concurrent action of Mendota Heights and Maple Grove upon the retirement or
the last outstanding Bonds, and this Agreement may not be terminated in ad
retirement or defeasance.
10. Distribution of Assets Upon Termination. Upon termination of this
all properties and any surplus moneys, acquired as a result of this Agreement, sh,
or distributed to Mendota Heights; provided that to the extent that any such properl
moneys have been contributed by Maple Grove with the consent of Mendota H
property or surplus moneys shall be returned to Mendota Heights and Maple Grove i
to their contributions.
11. Amendments. This Agreement may he amended by Mendota Height
Grove at any dme by a written instrument executed by both of them. To the exten
Statutes, section 471.59, or Minnesota Statutes, chapters'462C or 475, or any othe:
general or special law of the State of Minnesota, shall be amended or supplen
Agreement shall be deemed amended to the extent required to conform to such law
or supplemented, subject, however, to the next succeeding sentence. No amendment
impair the rights of the holders of any of the Bonds, unless they have consen
amendment in the manner provided for amendment of the indenture of trust or othei
instrument or resolution pertaining thereto.
ated by
�ance of
of such
ll be return
� or surplus
ights, such
proportion
and Maple
Minnesota
applicable
�nted, this
s amended
iereto may
:d to such
IN VVTTNESS VVHEREOF, the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota and e City of
Maple Grove, Minnesota, have each caused this Agreement to be executed on its b half by its
duly authorized officers and the seal of each respective city to be hereunto affixed; as of the
day and year first above written.
(SEAL)
CITY OF MENDOTA
I�IINNESOTA
By_ �� � �
Its
By
Its
4
GHTS,
CITY OF MAPLE GROVE, Mlt'NN�FSOTA
(SEAL)
By
Its
sy
��
CITY OF MII�TDOTA HEIGHTS
� `t:�� . �
Iviarch 10, 1994
TO: Mayor, City Council and City A
FROM: James E. Danielso
Pubic Works D'u �
SUBJECT: Pilot Knob Road Watermain Project - Bid Awazd
DISCUSSION:
At the February 1, 1994 meeting Council approved a feasibility report and
a watermain project to connect the two ends of the Mn/DOT projects being done �
Interchange Project to bring water to St. Peter's Church and the City of Mendota.
the
At the last meeting it was determined that the contract should be structured �o that
either 8" or 12" watermain could be brought to the Garron site.
Bids for that project will be opened March 14th and the results will be
meeting. �
:� � ��:
at this
� � `�� � 3I l � (R,4-
Y li � u'1 �!►I 1.� _ :1 :
I �`I �!' ' 1�
March 14, 1994
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adm' '
FROM: Shawn Sanders �'� �
Civil Engineer
SUB7ECT: �Vatermain & Street Reconstruction
Pilot Knob Road �
7ob No. 8420A
Improvement No. 84, Project No. 2A
DISCUSSION:
Bids for the above project were opened at 2:00 P.M., today, March 14, 19
were seven bidders and the low bidder was Ryan Contracting, Inc. of Burnsville.
amount was $72,230. The engineer's estimate was �76,000.
Ryan Contracting, Inc. has done work for the City in recent years, the L
Associated Bureaus utility unprovements. We have been satisfied with their work.
At a previous meeting, Council was concemed that the installat�on of a 12"
would encourage a higher density development for the Garron property and an 8"
would discourage this type of development. The engineering department considered
and feels that the cost difference of installing a 8" DIP compazed to a 12" DIP is min�
and for water supply purposes a 12" DIP would provide a much better volume of wa
protection purposes to the Garron site no matter bow it develops.
�K� ►� i►� i .i � : � � .
I recommend that the City Council accept the bids and award the
Contracting, Inc for their low bid of $72,230.
Y � � : .� 11C �!1
If Council concurs with the recommendation, they should pass a moti
Resolution No. 94-_, RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING C
FOR WATERMAIN AND STREET RESTORATION IMPROVIII�IENTS '
PIIAT KNOB ROAD AND ADJACENT AREAS (IlVIPROVIIV�NT NO. 84,
NO. 2A).
SS:dfw
�4. There
Their bid
and
is option
($5,400)
r for fire
to Ryan
adopting
SERVE
f �
City of 1Vdendo� �eights
Dakota Coun�y, 1Vlinnesot�
RESOIdtJ'1'I011T NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEP7'Il�TG B�S �1VD �A�VARDING CON'�ItACT FOIt
WATERMAIN AND STREET ItESTItOAZ'ION IlVIPROVEMENTS
TO SERVE PIIAT KNOB RO�ID A1�TD ADJACENT AREAS
(IlVIPROVIIVIENT NO. 84, PItOJECT NO. 2A)
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the proposed construction
watermain and street restoration unprovements to serve Pilot Knob Road and adjacent areas
(which improvements have heretofore beea lrnown and designated as Improveanent No. 84,
Project No. 2A), bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law and the following
bids were received complying with said advertisement:
NAIVIE OF BIDDER
Ry� Contracting, Inc.
Burnsville, IvII�T
Northdale Construction Co. Inc.
Rogers, NYN
Ro-5o Contracting, Inc.
Centerville, MN
R.P. Utilities, Inc.
Annandale, MN
F.IvI. Frattalone
St. Paul, MN
Penn Contracting, Inc.
Centerville, MN
C.S. McCrossan Const. Inc.
Maple Grove, MN
and
$72,230.00
$76,656.00
$77,550.00
$79,072.50
$82,304.00
$92,831.00
$116,921.00
WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommended that the low bid submitted by Ryan
Contracting, Inc. of Burnsville, Minnesot� be accepted.
� �►
� NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the bids for the abode project are hereby xeceived and
2. T'hat the low bid of Ryaai .Contracting, Inc. of Bumsville, Ivlinn
ted for the construcdon of the above described improvements be
is hereby accepted.
3. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed
and deliver any and all contracts and documents necessary consum
awarding of bids.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 15th day of Ma
CI'i'X COZJIVCIL
CI'I'X OF 1VIBNDOTA HEIGfITS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTFST:
I�athlee� M. Swanson, City Clerk
of the City
, submit-
the same
execute
e the
1994.
� NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTI( CABLE
COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
, 5845 Blaine Avenue
�Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota 55076-1401
612/450-9891 FAX 612/450-9429 TDD 612/552-9675
To:
From :
Date :
Subject :
M E M O R A N D U M
Mendota Heights City Council � .
Jodie Miller, NDC4/NDCTV Executive Direct r
March 11, 1994
Materials for March 15 Council Meeting
The revised Joint Powers Agreement of the Northern Dakota Cour
Commurucations Commission requires annual budget approval by six of
member cities. Because the revised Agreement was officially enacted in
of 1993, NDC4 is now presenting its 1994 budget to the seven cities for
The 1995 budget must be approved by August 1, 1994, so you'll be seein€
this summer!
�ty Cable
the seven
December
�ri.vvua.
me aga.in
Attached is the 1994 budget for your review. Also attached is a copy of a NATOA
Action Alert regarding important federal legislation that could take a ay cities'
authority to grant cable franchises . I am available to answer any question that you
may have on either of these items before Tuesday's meeting at 450-9891. O�therwise,
I will see you on Tuesday evening. Thank you. �
Also attached is�an Action Alert from the League of Minnesota Cities addressing
important state legislation which was faxed to'my office late Friday afternoon.
4d00
4011
45Q0
4200-4210
5000-5050
5100-5110
5125
5127
6000
6010
7005
7006
6020
6021
6022
7010
6110
7080
7100-7112
6220
7200
5130
7040
7210
6300
6247
6250
6270-6271
7220
7230-7232
7240
7060
7300
6280
6320
6330
7310
7340
7340
7350
7050
7055
NDC4 1994 DRAFT BUDGET
Approved by NDC4 March 9, 1994
REVENUES
ORIGINAL REVISED ACTUAL
1993 REDUCED (PRE-AUDIT) DRAFT (6/93) DRAFT (1/94)
BUDGET 1993 BUDGET AS OF 12/31/93 1994 BUDGET 1994 BUDGET
Franchise Fees $309,000 $309,OQ0 a302,986 a318,270 $306,016
Narrowcasting Settlement 27,000 0 0 0 0
Miscellaneous & Dub Income 5Q0 500 362 500 500
Interest 5,000 5,OQ0 2,930 5,000 3,000
SUBTOTAL 341,500 314,500 306,278 323,770 309,516
OPEHATING BUDGET
---Personnel
Salaries (4.5 FT�
FICA & PERA
Workers Comp. Insurance
Payroll Service
SUBTOTAL
---Operating Expenses
Accounting Services
Bank Charges
Cable Service - Office
City Payments
Conferences & Training
Consultants Services
Contingencies
Courier Service
Depreciatian Expense
Hearing Impaired Grant
Insurance
Legal Services
Memberships
Mileage
NDCN Grant
Newsletter
Office Rent
Office Equip/Furn. - non-cap
Office supplies
Postage
Printing
Promotion
Publications
Regional Channei 6 (MCN) Grant
Repairs/Maint.: Vdeo Equipment
Repairs/Maint.: Office Equipment
Speciel Events
Telephone
Vdeo Services - Cities
�deo Supplies
Videotape - Education
�deotape - Government
�deo Grants - Education
�deo Grants - Government
�deo Production - News Show
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL OPERATING IXPENSES
135, 467 130, 408 120, 046
16,270 16,270 13,461
0 0 658
0 0 150
126,226 126,091
15,160 15,295
0 850
0 150
151,737 146,678 134,315 141,386 142, 386
5,6Q0
400
340
0
s,aoo
1, 200
1,500
200
16,000
1,500
4,500
5,500
1,000
2,000
78, 411
1,400
33,662
0
3,500
1, 500
0
1, 500
750
1, 000
3, 000
0
�,oao
3, 500
3,900
1,500
1.400
2,OQ0
2, 000
2,000
0
5,000
400
340
30, 900
3,500
0
0
200
i 6, 000
0
5,000
8, 000
850
1,500
62,000
600
33,662
0
2.711
1,200
0
1,000
650
0
2,500
0
0
3,000
5,000
1,000
1,000
1,800
0
0
0
4,833
291
270
0
2, 467
0
0
317
16,000
0
3,066
10,536
1.218
1.799
62,000
516
33,661
1, 097
2, 388
1,326
0
1,441
655
0
4,360
0
0
2, 539
3,922
685
922
1, 795
0
0
0
5,000
310
384
31.827
3, 000
0
0
220
� s,aao
0
5,250
8,000
600
1,500
62,000
450
30,163
0
2, 380
1,200
0
250
300
0
2, 800
0
0
3,000
4,000
1,000
750
2, 000
0
0
0
5,000
0
384
30,602
3,000
0
0
520
16.000
0
4,250
8,000
600
1, 500
62,000
450
30,163
500
2,380
1, 200
0
731
600
0
1,700
1,800
0
4,000
4,000
1,000
750
2, 000
0
0
0
189,763 187,813 158,104 182,384 183,130
341,500 334,491 292,418 323,770 325,516
REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENSES SO ($19,991) $13,859 $0 (�16,000)
NDC4 199� DRAFf BUDGET ORIGINAL
Approved by NDC4 March 9, l984 1993
BUDGET
REVISEp ACTUAL
REQUCED {PRE—AUQIT) DRAFf
1983 8llDGEC AS OF 12131i93 1994 Bt
OTHER INCREASE (DECREASES)
8000 Transterred assets from {taj iVOGN 4 4 fl.00
NET INCREASE {DECRE/iS� tN FUND BALANCE Sp (Si9,991} 513,859 �
ADJU57MENiS TO RECClNCILE
lNCREASE (CIECREASE� IIV
FUND BALANCE TO CASW
FLOWS FROM OPERATIONS
Net increase (decreese) in fund balance 0 (19,991j 13,859
Add back nan operating revenues:
Narrowcasting Settleme�t irom Continerital 27,OOQ 27,000 27,000
Actd back nan cash expenses:
Depreciation 16,000 16,C�10 16,�0
E.ess:
* Purchese of capital improvements NOC4 (10,OQ0)
** Pu�ch. of cap. imp. {For Ciiiesj (27,000} {27,040} (17,828} _
Net increase (decrease) in cash $i6.000 (�3.991) *** �29,030 �
* Pre—Audit Estimate for 1993
** Source of funds: NarrowcasNng Settlement from Continental (Cepita! Improvements for Cities.)
*** Not Including i0% Frar�chise Fse Payment #o Cities.
**'* Carried over from 1993 Narrowcasting Fund (527,000) Capital Improvements for Cities.
0
DE3AF� �t/84}
1894 BUDGET
0
4
(S16.QQ01
� (ts,000)
27,Q0 27,000
16, 18,000
0
27,4 {36,i7i)
16 04 '*** (�9,1711
" 199� �
R��+ :l1c�; �;�R � 1
The National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors
An affiliate of tfie National league of Cities �
March 8, 1994
Congress is now seriously considering legislation to allow telephone companies to enter the
cable market without a local franchise. Local officials must act now to safeguard our
communities' interests.
The House Telecommunications Subcommittee has passed H.R. 3636, which has no franchising
requirement for telcos providing cable. While H.R. 3636 would pernrit a local government to
impose a fee, even that provision would not match the franchise fee obligation of cable
companies. The fiill House Energy and Commerce Committee is expected to act on H.R. 3636
as early as next week! The bill then will go to the House floor for action.
The Senate Commerce Committee is now holding hearings on S. 1822, which appears to require
a franchise for telcos providing cable but is silent on whether video dialtone service would need
a franchise. While S. 1822 is therefore far superior to the House bill in that regard, there will
be efforts to weaken it as the process moves forward.
The Clinton Administration supports telco entry into the cable market without a franchise. Even
more alarming, a White House position paper recommends relieving cable companies of their
franchise obligations in most instances.
In the rush to unleash the telephone companies and promote competition, many Washington
officials are ignoring the community needs and interests protected by the franchising system. IF
LOCAL OFFICIALS DO NOT ACT NOW, CONGRESS MAY SOON PASS, AND T'HE
PRESIDENT MAY SIGN, LEGISLATION TO PREEMP'r LOCAL JURISDICTION AND
ALLOW USE OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY WITfI NO CO1��VIUNITY OBLIGATIONS.
You should immediately brief local elected officials in your area and urge them to communicate
as soon as possible with your Senators and Representatives. Personal meetings or telephone calls
are better than letters.
The key points to make are:
• Telephone companies should be subject to the same obligations as cable
companies, a level playing field.
• Telephone companies should not object to malcing the same commitments to the
community as cable companies.
• Franchising will not slow develapment of the information superhighwa ; on the
contrary, Iocalities welcome compedtion and can expeditiously autha new
entrants.
• Only local franchising can address each community's unique ' terests;
nationalizing requir�ments like PEG access cannot reflect the d'xversi� of the
country's communities.
0
•
Franchising delivers to the public appropriate benefits for use of its prop�rty and
allows local officials ta assure adequate customer service. �
If communities are to participate in the infarmation superhighway, Iacal
must play a meaningful role.
• Telco competition to cable is consistent with a franchising process; the federal
government should not preempt loca]. governments from protectin their
communities.
PLEA►SE ACT lYOW — YC1U CAN CALL 4R W�.:� Y4UR
REPRESENTATI�'E AS FOLLOWS:
� • Senator
The Senate
Washington, DG 20510
(202� 224-3121
Representative
The House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 224-3121
The members of the House and Senate Committees with jurisd'zction over the
i` i'
�
-�I ,t�USE: Dingell {31�Iich.}, VVaxrr�an �Cal.), Sharp (Ind.}, Markey {Mass.}, S 'ft {Wash.},
Collins {Ill.}, Synar {Qkia.}, Tauzin (La.}, Wyden (Ore.), Hai1 (Tex.), Richaz son (N.M.},
Slattery (l{an.}, Bryant (Tex.}, Boucher �''Va.}, Caoper (Tenn.}, Rowland (Ga,), M ton (N.Y.),
Towns (N.Y.}, Studds (Mass.), Lehman (Cal.), Pallone, Jr. (N.J.), Washington ex.), Schenk
(CaI.), ECrown (Ohio), Kreidler (Wash.), Margolies-Mezvinsky (Pa.), Lambert (Ar .), Moorhead
(Cal.), Bliley (Va.), Fields (Tex.), Oxley (Ohio), Bilirakis (Fla.), Schaefer ( ol.), Barton
(Tex.), McMillan (N.C.), Hastert (lll,), Upton (Mich.), Stearns (Fla.), Paucon (N Y.}, Gillmor
(Ohio), Klug (Wis.), Franks (Conn.), Greenwood (Pa.), Crapo (Idaho).
E�,N .A_TE_: Hollings {S.C.), Inauye {I3aw.), Fard {Ky.), Exon (Neb.), Rockef�ller {W.V.},
Kerry {Mass.}, Breaux {La.}, Bryan {Nev.), Robb {Va.), Dargan (N.D.), Ma ews (Tenn.},
Danforth {Mo.), Packwood (�re.), Pressier (S.D.), Stevens (Alas.}, McCain ('z.}, Burns
(Mant.}, Gorton tWash.}, Lott (Miss.}, T�utclunson (Tex.}.
PLEA►SE ACT N4W — IT IS ESPECIALLY IlViPORTANT TI3A.T ELECTED FFICIALS
FR.OM YOUR COMMUNITY HAVE INPUT TO THE CONGRESSIONAL P OCESS .AS
SOON AS POSSIBLE.
r'
.ACTIQI�T AL�R�"
TF?LF�.'HON'� INDUSTR.Y SUPFQ�tTS �tLL 'TtJ DERBG�ET�..ATP r�EW �NF4x2MA�'ION
S UPBR�IIG�iWAX; C'T�Y GONCERNS NtJT ADD�SSEU
City officials must contact 1oca1 legistators to urge them to support dic�ct municipaI
involvement in cievelt��iuent of a new regvlatory structur� for future tel�cammunicatzotts
services Fdr 11�Iin�tesot,�. The L,eagua has 1eat�ted tha�t U.S. West is urg-iing action i�y fhe '94
1c�islatur� to drac�iatically rettuce state r�gulatKon ta pertn�t Iac�� and regionat felr,phone
cvmpanies to r�tove fc�rw�trd with new fiber aptzc video, voice, tiata and interactive servir.�s.
Pro�osed alten�ative forizts of regul�ation providc rto locat contrai or �xotectiot� for existing
community cc��nn�unications services.
On Mareh 7, Rc�resentat�ve Lor�n 7ennin,�s (DFL-L�istrict 18B) intraduced H.�.
2408, which would aut�otize substantial �hanges in s�ata regulaiion af ti�ese new servic�s to
t� offer�i by #he tele�hone industry in rehtrn for �a�rping the price of some e�cisting telephone
service, but ��ot any of those services a�saciated with the new "informatiaa sup�r�ughway.
Cities wcre nc�t invotved in the deve�lopment of the tegislatian. Cvnversations with state
ofiiciais iudicat� that th� St�te is smphasizu�g "efficiency" iat an �ffott to design a r�gtilatory
framewc�rk to recluce costs for the indvstry and remove unnecessary barriers for development
of new teieccfrYimunications technoiogy.
'ihis Izgistatipr� daes not requite thc t�lephone rnciustry to provicle coiuu�unity ac,cess
crtiannels, or production assistancelequipment for �ublic, educatiQnal or governtt��nta�! �ccess
pragrammin� or conn�ctions ta 1c�cal institutic�us such �s sctiools and city hall.s. Witll no local
ZO' d S�fl' �I�i 8t�� �T b6 Ti �pl,d �L00—�C�t�—�T9� "!�l S3IlI3 t�!!la .�Q 3t1��3�1
�
franchi�ing oF such xelecol�;municatic�ns syst�ms, cttrret�t state policy that has
t�eveioptttent of se�vices by cable systems will be overturned. 'Z'hese a�re key
e�xinhasize in ex�lainittg the unportanc� of retaining city authority to regulate
telepl�on� company information services:
* the 1Ggislation does nat p;ratect existing �omm�nity comma�ica�ic�n serv�ces
P�� channe�s a�d grogrammi�g);
E�7
new
* there is no requir�t�ent fOr t8l�hon� CO�npatlies tq obtain a franChis� frotri th� ciiy far ths
u�e of public rights of way �+r tc+ establish locat cotitcal anc� oversigttt o�
ar technical stanc�arrcls (sigrtal quality);
* the lcgislation d�s not provide fc�r effectiv� campetitian since cable camp4
currently offering tele�hone services and at�e less likely tv be abie ta compete
cc3rnganies g�ven the barrrers af federal r�gulatiorr and the extent of tl�e iu�anc
a hug� cc�rparativz� (U.S. Vt�est),
'� telephor�� cott�panies take on no risk in this entry intv informatian services bei
woEild per�itit telcos to wa11c away fram the plan if the ventures fait;
* it is not necessary for the stat� legisl�ture t� mave on this proposa� in the shQ�
sinr.� con�ress i:� expected to aet on major fedearat telecammunications 1e�islatian
sessian;
'� civic and community tnvolvemet�t in the develnpm�nt oF these deregulation
been Iacking ancl must be taken into eonsideratian befo�� swe�ping chang�s are
Sq�ppor#ers of proposals calling for �weeping deregc�Iatian for ietephon�
cl�ve�o�n�exrt and c�peration of tite ncw "inforn�aiion superfiighway" view this
as necess�ry ta ancc�ucag� com�etition. Th� prqb�e[n iS tiiere �r� n0 cotn�etito�r�
r servic�
s are nat
.h telephonc
resources of
�ause the bili
. '94 session
et this
�asals has
in policy
�'�' d 8�C0' pN 6b � Z� tr6 ti Z -�'�� Z�.Oa-06tr-ZZ� � ��l S3I I� hll�i �0 3f1��3�
i
/
compari.ies such as U.S, West. Iust�xd, tF.S. West wil1 gain the apporhinity to gaYn �.
monopaty in providin� s�ich scrvices to businesse� and tiomes and wi2I be ��rgely free of
regulation to �rotect against cross-subsidy in which rata-payers wall end up supportit�� thB
tetcn �ntry inta videa and interactive iinformation servic�s.
�
.,,., ��,. �T ,�� TT .��« z�oa-a��-zi�: ��l s�ziz� r��ra �0 3n�d=
TO: .
FROM:
SITBJECT:
crrY o� MErmoT� �GHTs
Mayor, City Council and City
7ames E. Danielson
Pubic Works D' ec
Water Tower Painting
Job No. 9309
DISCUSSION:
�� �
� � �� �►►. � . �'�
March 10, 1994
At the February 1, 1994 meeting Council discussed a report from AEC En�
that analyzed the City's 2MMG Water Tower and recommended a course of action
repair and maintenance. At that meeting Council discussed in detail with Mr. 7ac�
AEC's Representative, the added costs associated with the decorative fluting. Tha1
was added at the time of construction to the tank to disguise some severe buckling
bowl's exterior surface. Mr. Kollmer explained that over $90K of the repair costs
associated with painting and repairing those decorative flutes. Mr. Kollmer volunt
further study this issue and to determine the costs associated with some other alten
including totally removing and replacing the bowl. �
The issue of whether or not Cathodic protection should be utilized was also
and I was directed to get St. Paul Water Utility's opinion.
AEC Supplemental Report:
AEC has now completed their supplemental re�ort and it is attached. In
they investigated three new options with respect to the water tower's bowl:
1.
2.
3.
NOTE:
Completely remove and replace the tower's bowl for a total i
$309,300.
Remove and abandon decorative flutes for a total cost savings of
for its
Kollmer,
fluting
�f the
were
�red to
discussed
report
cost of
,050.
Remove the flutes, paint them on ground and reinstall them. This ' less
expensive way to complete the originat plan. Total savings -$40,6 0.
AEC also revised their original cost estimate up $14,000 to $609,SSfb. The
above three costs adjustments were calculated on this revised amouq�t.
Cathodic Protection: Added initial cost -$15,750
I called St. Paul Water Utility and obtained their opinion on cathodic protection. �"hey
offered the following comments:
l. Cathadic protection oe n t protect the entire tank, only the wetted part of the
bowl (see attached drawing).
2. The most wlnerable part oi tank remains unprotected.
3. Cathodic protection rec�uires anamal inspection and adjustments which adds to
the cost ($300.00 per year).
4. Ice caa damage anodes so thea� is a need to remove them in winter.
5. The "old" style cathodic protection was sometimes suspected to be counter
productive.
6. There is not enough experience to be certain of the results of the new style
cathodic protection.
7. eVhen properly protected with coatings Cathodic protection should not be
necessary.
8. St. Paul Water Utility does not recommend Cathodic protection.
ACTION ItEQUIRED:
Select a course of action/or actions and authorize stafF to solicit progosals froffi
qualified consultants to prepare plans and specifications.
NOTE: Please retum AEC regorts to staff, they are expensive and aze needed in the
bidding process.
��
XL ANODE ASSEMBLY
�
HIGH WATER LEVEL
X� RISER ANODE
ASSEMBLY �
ERP SYSTEMS FOR ICING TANKS
. . Eievc�#ed Ta�nk.. .
XL REFERENCE ELECTROOE
ASSEMB�Y FOR N0.2 AND N0.3
EtECTROdE, _CONDUiT ENTR0.NCE
XL
NQTE�
OL/ANT/T Y, LEN6TH AND LOCAT/ON OF XL ANODE ASSEMBL /ES AND
XG REFERfNCE ELECTRppE ASSEMBG/E5 ARE D£TERMlNEO BY THE ERP
£N6lN£FRIN6 DEStGN t0 SUtT1NDlYlDURt APPLtCATlON
YPlCA�
dSTALLATION
�i3.�o7�
2ENCE ELECTRODE
'FOft NO.tElEGTRQOE
L UNIT
L`I"�
v} � i
ti.� ��� ��'��n �� ���',�,�w� i
� wr���n►c� �-r�Er�Nn►N
._._ DIVISION _...... ..._ ._.. _.._._. ._.._..__._..._�___.__ ...._._..._._w___... ---___+__.__...._..�. __ ,_
25 MAIN STREET, BELLEVlLLE, NEW JERSEY 07109 CAT. N0. I�I 3. Q�Tr'J
9 - 77
�
AEC ENGINEERING
5ii E(eventh Avenue Sauth
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415
Phone: i612} 332-8905
Fax: (612) 33431q1
March 9, 1994
Mr. Jim Danielson, Pubiic Warks Directar
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victaria Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 5511$
Re: Revised Engineer's Cast Estimate
2.0 MMG Elevafied Water Tc�wer
City af Mendota Heights, Minnesota
AEC Project No. 55�3225
Dear Mr. Danielson:
' ENGINEERS
INSPECTORS
By Fax & U.S. Mait
Thank yau fior the apportunity to meet with you and the City Council to discuss our
inspection report an your 2,000,000 gallan hydropillar.
Enclosed for your review and reference is a sample request for quotation that you may
use ta solicit and select a consulting engineering firm far preparation c�f plans and
specifications and reconditioning inspection and praject management.
As discussed, we are pleased to revise our Engineer's Cost Estimate to include the
fo!lowing optians.
1 i Cost of submerged Gathodic Protection System, add $15,750.
2} Cost to replace straight side of the she[I fo elirr�inate denfis and buckles in
the shell plates. This would alsa eliminate the decorative panels and the need
and acfditional costs to paint and repaint these panels. Pitt-Dss Moines, Inc.
(PDM) has provided us with a procedure and cost for this work. The procedure
wauEd be to remove the roof, remove the shell, replace the shell plates and
shell courses (3), and replace the roof. Cost for this work is estimated at
$445,040. This would also reduce our structural repair estimate by
appraximately $35,800.
Mr. Jim Dainelson, City of Mendota Heights
AEC Project No. 5593225
Our revised Section 5.0 would be as follows:
5.1 Interior Structural Repairs $ 16.600.(
5.2 Interior Wet Coating Complete Replacement $ 131.750.(
Type of Coating - Epoxy System
5.3 Interior Dry Coating - Repair $ 51.000.(
Type of Coating - Epoxy System
5.4 Exterior Structural Repairs/ New Shell Courses $ 459.00O.0
5.5 Exterior Coating* Complete Replacement $ 215.00O.0
Type of Coating - Epoxy/Urethane System
5.6 Engineering Specifications and Inspection Fee $ 45.500.0
5.7 Estimated Total Cost $ 918.850.0
*Includes cost for containment. Does not include costs for new log
and/or lettering.
3) Cost to remove and abandon the decarative shell panels. We have
investigated the removal and/or painting of the 96 decorative panels. Fir;
cost to remove and abandon the decorative panels. This cost is estimate
$32,600. This would modify the Engineer's Cost Estimate as follows:
5.1 Interior Structural Repairs $ 52.400.00
5.2 Interior Wet Coating Complete Replacement $ 131.750.00
Type of Coating - Epoxy System .
5.3 Interior Dry Coating - Repair $ 51.000.00
Type of Coating - Epoxy System
5.4 Exterior Structural Repairs $ 46.850.00
5.5 Exterior Coating* Complete Replacement $ 215.000.00
Type of Coating - Epoxy/Urethane System
5.6 Engineering Specifications and Inspection Fee $ 45.500.00
5.7 Estimated Total Cost ' $ 542.5�0.00
*Includes cost for containment. Does not include costs for new logo
and/or lettering.
ot:jrk-Itr�5593225
Page 2
further
t is the
�tobe
Mr. Jim Dainelson, Ciiy of Mendota Heights
AEC Project No. 5593225
Page 3
4) Cost to remove, paint off-site and replace decorative shell panels. The cost
to paint these panels and lettering in place has been confirmed to be
approximately $97,000. As an alternate, I have investigated the cost to remove,
repaint off-site, and to reinstall these panels and the lettering at approximately
$59,000. This would modify the Engineer's Cost Estimate as follows:
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
Interior Structural Repairs
Interior Wet Coating Complete Replacement
Type of Coating - Epoxy System
Interior Dry Coating - Repair
Type of Coating - Epoxy System
Exterior Structural Repairs
Exterior Coating* Complete Replacement
Type of Coating - Epoxy/Urethane System
Engineering Specifications and Inspection Fee
Estimated Total Cost
*Includes cost for containment.
$ 52.400.00
$ 131.750.00
$ 51,000.00
$ 14.250.00
$ 274.000.00
$ 45.500.00
'. .: •1� 1�
I must apologize for an error on our original Engineer's Cost Estimate. We failed to
include the repainting of the light-weight steel letter panels attached to the decorative
panels. Those letters are welded into place. As they are light-weight panels, they are
subject to severe warping if blasted in place. Therefore, they need to be removed,
painted and reinstalled with removal bolting for future repainting. The estimated cost
for this is $14,000. This should be added to our original cost estimate, which would
increase that total to $609,550.
Based on our discussions and additional cost investigations, we recommend that you
consider options 3 and 4 as the best solutions. Please remember that we can bid this
project with the various options discussed here. This would then solicit bids from
contractors and provide exacting information for the Owner to choose the best overall
and most financially attractive option.
Please feel free to call me to discuss any questions you may have on this matter.
Sincerely,
AE ngineering, Inc.
. �
ack R. Kollmer
Manager, Coatings Systems
NACE Certified Coatings Inspector No. 691
JRK/ot
ot:jrk-Itr�5593225
c � . .
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
FOR WATER TOWER RECONDITIONING
Introduction:
U , Minnesota is :
proposals for engineering and inspection services for inspection report review,
plan preparation, construction management, and inspection for cleaning, repair
painting one (1) 2,000,000 gallon hydropillar elevated water tank.
oliciting
design,
'nq and
, by the Request for Proposals (RFP), is not undertaking a competitive bidding
process and does not promise to accept the lowest, or any other, proposal.
specifically reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive any roposal
requirements, to investigate the qualifications of any proposer, to obtain new pr posals,
or to proceed to have the services provided in any way deems appropriat .
Deadline for the proposals is _ p.m., _, 1994. Please
(3) copies of your proposal to:
Jim Danielson, Public Works Director
City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118
Owner Consultant Evaluation and Selection Process:
shall review the qualifications of the respondents and shall uniformly
them. Qualifications shall be evaluated by an objective process. Under the tern
RFP document, engineering and inspection services shall be provided
organizations or individuals who are properly qualified to do the work. Those so
are:
1. An engineering organization whose principals are registered professional
engineers in the State of Minnesota specializing in engineering; preparation
of plans, specifications, and inspection services; and having at least five
years experience in the performance of this work on elevated potable water
storage reservoirs.
2. The inspectors assigned to the work in the field are required to be National
Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) Certified Coating Inspectors or a
NACE Intermediate Coating Inspector working under the direct supervision
of a NACE Certified Coating Inspector and AWS Associate Welding
Inspector working under the direction of a Registered Structural Engineer.
3. All engineering and inspection shall conform to the requirements of AWWA-
D-100-84; National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE); American
national Standards Institute (ANSI); American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM); State Health Codes; and the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA) Standards.
three
of this
�ly by
�alified
4. Past record of performance on similar contracts, including such factors as
control of costs, quality of work, and ability to meet schedules.
5. Capacity of the respondent to perform the work (including any specialized
services) within the time limitations, taking into consideration the current
and planned workload of the respondent.
Scoqe of Work:
The work required of the consultant will include the following:
1. Predesign Services
The work included under this section shall include the following:
a. Confirmation of results from AEC Engineering, Inc. Inspection Report,
Project No. 5593255, dated November 18, 1993.
2. Design Services
The work included under this section shall include the following:
a. The consultant shall prepare and provide all necessary bid documents
and drawings for the towers, foundations, and accessories as follows:
• all civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, and instrumentation
drawings
• specifications including both General Conditions and technical
sections
b. Provide a final engineering estimate of the construction cost of the
towers.
c. Provide bidding support senrices including responding to bidders
questions, preparation of addendum, assist in receipt of bids, analysis of
bids received, and assist in award of the construction contract.
3. Reconditioning Plans and Specifications
The specifications will include:
Section I Advertisement for Bids
This section provides a concise project description and
meets the requirements for legal advertisement.
-2-
�
U
Section II Instructions to Bidders
' This section provides precise instructions to bidde
including the scope of work, insurance, payments, time
completion, bidder qualifications, taxes and permits, lec
requirements, performance bond and other importa
project information.
Section 111 Proposal
This section contains the bid proposal, legal requirem
and the bidder and subcontractor qualification forms.
Section IV Project Reauirements
This section contains the description of the project, intei
project schedule, execution of contract documents, noti
to proceed, project meetings, work hours, quality assuranc
liquidated damages, application for payment, retainac
substantial completion, project close-out and fir
submittals, final payment application, work to be done
owner, contractors' use of premises, rejected work ai
materials and guarantee.
Section V Specifications
This section provides all of the particulars concerning the
project: workmanship, structural modifications, surface
repairs, surface preparation, material selection and coating
application, health and safety requirements, unfavorable
weather conditions, clean up and sterilization, repair work,
containment plan and environmental regulations,
superintendent, inspection of work, and disposal and
required TCLP testing, and other procedures that must be
adhered to in order to maximize project quality.
Section VI Su�plemental Conditions
These supplemental conditions amend or supplement the
general conditions and other provisions of the contract
documents as required by the owner or project conditions.
Section VII General Conditions
This section is commonly referred to as boiler plate.
Actually, there are several valuable provisions that can be
added here such as authority of the engineer�nspector and
final inspection procedures.
Section VIII Contract Aareement
This section includes the form of agreement between the
owner and the contractor.
Section IX Payment and Performance Bond
This section included the forms for payment and
performance bond.
-3-
Section X Inspection Report
This enclosure gives prospective bidders a clear idea of the
condition of the tank and the scope of work involved.
Section XI Specification Drawings
The drawings include information on existing conditions as
well as any required repairs or modifications.
Section XII Surface Pre arp ation
This section references industry accepted standards such as
NACE of American Concrete Institute (ACI) for surface
preparation requirements.
Section XIII Existing Paint Total Lead Test Results
This section contains the laboratory test results from paint
chip testing for total lead in conformance with State
regulations.
Section XIV Loao and Letterinq
This section includes drawings and color requirements for
signs, logos and lettering as required by the owner.
4. Construction Management
The work included under this section shall include the following:
a. Conduct a preconstruction meeting.
b. Review of shop drawings.
c. Issue contract document clarifications as required.
d. Process contract change order requests.
e. Review, correct and approve contractor submitted construction progress
schedule.
f. Process progress pay requests.
g. Prepare record drawings.
h. Monitor contractor progress for conformance with construction
schedule.
i. Prepare daily inspection records and submit weekly, including the
monitoring of environmental weather conditions, conformance to
environmental regulations, surface preparation inspection, mixing,
thinning and applications of coatings for conformance to specifications
and coating manufacturers requirements, and all other requirements of
the NACE certified coating inspector coating inspection requirements.
j. Hold and report on weekly job site progress meetings.
-4-
L y •
k. Monitor waste generation at job site. Take TCLP samples, submit i
testing and report on results.
I. Review contractor submitted waste disposal plan, TCLP test results a
report findings.
m. Conduct final inspection.
n. Prepare and execute punch list and project acceptance certificate.
o. Notification to contractor and owner of liquidated damages, if required.
p. Resolution/negotiation of liquidated damages.
q. Request final submittals from contractor in conformance with contra
documents.
r. Process final pay request/project clos�out.
s. Process warraniy start date to owner, contractor and surety.
5. Inspection Services
The work included under this section shall include the following:
a. Perform reconditioning inspection.
• Structural work shall be inspected by inspectors qualified to perform
the work under the direction of a Registered Structural Engineer.
• Welding, surface preparation, and coatings application shall be
performed by NACE Certified Coating Inspectors or a NACE
Intermediate Coating inspector working under the direct supervision
of a NACE Certified Coating inspector and AWS Associate Welding
Inspector working under the direction of a Registered Structural
Engineer.
Cost Proposal:
The cost of the proposed services shall be submitted as a lump sum for
Sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 and an estimate of costs or lump sum for Section 5.
schedule detailing all anticipated categories of charges shall be provided for SE
services; if an estimated cost of providing the services under Section 5 is used.
Factors for Evaluation and Award of Cantract:
Proposals shall be reviewed by for the following items:
1. Approach in addressing the issues described in the Scope of Work section.
2. Experience of the proposed personnel relative to the Scope of Work of this
RFP, as well as experience of the company as a whole.
3. The length of time the firm shall require to carry out the work.
-5-
3ch of
A fee
;tion 5
4. Results of reference checks.
5. Completeness of the proposal.
6. Cost of the project.
reserves the right, without qualifications, to select any proposai, to reject any or ali
proposals, and to apply its judgment with respect to any proposal submitted. Although costs will
not be the overriding criterion in the selection, the cost may be the determining factor if
proposals are deemed to be equal in content.
Once an engineering firm has been selected, will issue an order to proceed. The firm
shall not proceed with any work until the order to proceed has been issued.
�
CITY OF MEI�7DOTA HEIGHTS
March il, 1994
To: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative �nt
Subject: Concept Design for North Kensington Park
DISCIISSION
Since October the Parks and Recreation Commission
considering concept designs for North Kensington Park
February 24, 1994 they hosted a neighborhood meeting with r
of the area. The neighborhood meeting was designed to
input and suggestions about the development of this park ar
attended by approximately 40 reaidents.
The Commission discussed the responses received and t]
generated at the neighborhood meeting. (See attached PaY
dated March 4, 1994.) The Commission passed three mot
recommendation on this issue. First, the Commission felt t]
a demand for tennis and that it should be placed in Hagsti
Park. They recommended that this be accomplished by plac�
on the Capital Improvements Plan as a high priority to be
the near future.
The second recommendation was that North Kensingt�
should�be developed with a"backyard concept" that �
landscaping, two barbecue pits, four picnic tables and two
along the path. The recommendation included contracting
professional landscape architect who would incorporate the
suggestions on landscaping that were received from the neigY
residents.
The third recommendation was that the expenditu
development of this "backyard concept" be between $20,
$30,000, including the cost and fees for a landscape arch;
If City Council agrees with these recommendations, the
consider directing s�aff to seek proposals and bids from 1
architects to design this park. Following a bid a�
landscape architect services, plans and specifications
considered by the Parks and Recreation Commission and City
�
is been
and on
sidents
301].Clt
it was
input
memo
is of
�e was
-Ring
this
ne in
a Park
�cludes
►enches
with a
rritten
�orhood
�es for
) 0 0 and
tect.
should
idscape
rd f or
can be
�uncil.
RECONIl�NDATIOI�i
r
r
The Parks and Recreation Commission voted unanimously (7-0) on
the following recommendations:
1. �City Council should approve the construction of tennis courts
at Hagstrom-Ring Park as there is neighborhood support and
that this park has been pre-graded for tennis. This item
would be placed in the upcoming Capital Improvements Plan as
a high priority item to be done in the near future and its
funding could be determined at that point.
2. That the City Council approve a concept plan for North
Kensington Park that includes landscaping, two barbecue pits,
four picnic tables and two benches along the pathway, to be
designed by a landscape architect based on the suggestions for
landscaping provided by the residents of the area.
3. That City Council approve expenditures of $20,000 to $30,000,
including landscape architect fees and costs, from the
remaining referendum money for the development of this park.
ACTION REQIIIRED
If the City Council desires to implement the Parks and
Recreation Commission's recommendation, they should pass a motion
approving the "backyard concept" plan as described above and direct
staff to request proposals from qualified landscape architects for
the design of this park.
NOTE: The City Council was provided with a copy of the
written comments received prior to, at or after the
neighborhood meeting with their Friday packets on
March 4th. Theae comments have not been included
again due to their volume.
If any Council member desires copies of these
written comments, please contact me at 452-1850.
e�
:i
CJ
:
To:
From:
Subject:
�ITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
March 4, 1994
Parks and Recreation Commiasion �
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assi ��
North Kensington Park - Discussion of Concept
Review of Neighborhood Meeting
�3�1���•�+1
i ign
On February 24, 1994, the Parks and Recreation Co 'ssion
hosted a neighborhood meeting to solicit ideas and suggestio s from
residents in the area around North Rensington Park ab t the
development of this park. It was a very positive meeting a tended
by over 40 residents, six children, five Parks d Rec
Commissioners, two Council members, a Planning Commissio er and
staff .
City staff received 25 written comments and approximat ly one
dozen phone calls in addition to the comments received at the
neighborhood meeting. (Please see attached.) It was not asy to
categorize all the comments, but the following unscientific olling
was taken:
Park IIse Preferences
Landscaping, berms, plantings, trees
Tennis at Hagstrom-Ring _
Gathering area/picnic tables
Passive, open park
"Backyard" concept �
Opposed to active uses
Opposed to parking
Basketball hoop
Horseshoes
Barbecue pits
Benches/rest area
Badminton/shuffleboard/bocce ball
Volleyball '
Par Course and Paths
Tennis Courts at Rensington
Ice Skating/Roller Hockey
Wildflower Beds
Pond Improvements
13
11
10
9
8
7
7
5
5 �=
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
1
1
Many of these cartegories could be lumped together and
the individual categories there were many different suggest;
ideas. The Commission should first review the resu�ts
neighborhood meeting. �
within
Lons or
of the
0
PARIZ REFERENDUM
Funds Available
Question #1
Question #2
Other funds
(includes MSA, County, Water
Utility and School District funds)
TOTAL
Funds Expeaded/Committed
Expended thru 12-15-93
Outstanding Contracts or Purchase
Orders
Mendakota Park Riosk Signage
TOTAL
Balaace of Funds RemaiaiaQ
TOTAL
LxistiaQ Coamnitments
Kensington Power Poles (raise)
Identified Needs or Improvemeats
Kensington Park Signage $
Kensington Park Top dress soccer fields
North Kensington Park Development
$2,700,000
$ 700,000
S 168.302
$3,568,302
$3,484,649
$ 3.000
$3,487,649*
$ 80,653
$ 25,000
1,500
6 to 5,000
61 to 76,000
* Includes Engineering charges at full rate throughout the
life of the referendum.
r
, �r �
�7
y
Q b
n ~ �Z .
~.! " `�-.i,,,,-
�
Uj o
-„
�
�� a
: �---�._
..�
BeoFaR
� �Q�Rr
, ,... _ � ' * /� ' ' ` • � • � w - • � _= a - _
. .. �. . . . , •-. • �• . • , • �• , • • �, _ �r — _.�.-=_� , • , . . . , , . t;����'.:
... �,, . . . .� , .. � -- _o, �� .
� ' • l.
- • • • � � • • ' � • � • � � • � � � ` a. %� • � • . .
•
s • . * 'E- +!� _ � • • �, .
� � � � • • • • • � ` * � • � • � � � Q,�i' % � /- � ♦ � � s a � '
� ' • i • "• � � � Q � � _ �,�„�. � � � .: :
• • • • • � • • • � s � ; • d • � � ' � :tt!�:: J * � � • . • • - s,� :
K • X .:..
..... . - -
� .......
..::::�:•:::• •
� • * ..........
� ..i3:::: ff.i:.
, � ::3::::.: �:::� "4'� •::5�::::::i{:':� � :: - �
_ ���� + � • � �
� ♦ ....» rll'... ::�t��N..... • .j`. /♦ ♦;
j . . . .� :�;::� :;;:�� . . �::
- . . . • . . `�� t:.::. • �::.... �..... . :.��:f:� :;:s�t:::� :::;� :`:..: '�:� :::,:.; _ . . • _=e' •
� � • • • ��i�;`„ : =,[:t:t ���::::: , .;::::.� ::E�-::: � t •
s , � .� • ::s:;;::::yi�,:• ' „+�.: �� � `t} 'r� � .
.... . ..::.s::::�:::::.:� �:•� . _
.::a:�:=.::s:aa�::' '.'""'w�";� i _: .-.— �� / � • � � • � ' �
• j., • s''�`';•':"'``. ' • .:.: „ ii;t;.g ;� t � ::: i;,s:� :..
• � :::�;•::::::_.• ..ii:::: ...... _ .
: ,:�
. ,t� .
� �., :�� ..... t:..... , : : s: . ...
::; ::.. ; ; •. , ,y, - •
. . .:.::::::::::�:�s. ::;_:;:::;,;i;..:::. � , • ',
� • � • . • • • �� • � s's;::�=.s..,i' :;;..`. :::::�,::�' � � ! �';% � � _ � Q ', :
....... , .
.. ... • :.;:: 's:.... , ' • • • • �' • • •• ,,
• � * ' • • • � » ��` :i� �':'•!�:':i:;j.:; ` :i:1' ::: :;ti::::. ��::•':.l•:i=.'s: � • • � � • � �'� 1 • . t t- .
• � • • i • • • :�_"�'•_�''•�'atiiii:"::::::.. �. • � • � ., • } . \
. :..::::::;::� :_:::� . ; :� :��;:"•:. ::��: �i::_��!�_ � � � • � � •
� • • `'_.�:�:� i:::::s:;.::::: ��:a� ::: �:: •: {:' �::� �:s: �
• : ........:..: : :::.� ....:!4� � � � W •
• � i ,� � if ��i^iiiiiii� :iS:•• :..: iiiEii'ei5i;eik :;., ' m � � ����� * '"� � � •
/ • �.., � • i'siItei� i;iiai^iii:iii : :. . ...... .:.yc:iii?iii....,,,: ii"r.i:»�: � • � • • • � � I �«�••
� `� s '.:e�:c.::iiqii:�:^.r:: �ii=:if0' :::�:i..:::::iiii�:�:• • • • _ n
/ —...� . • � ,....... �..:. :. :, :.. ;:; _ _
...............:... .
• � ............._...........,.
R � � , � ........m:::::::::::� ::r:r� ;� i �
;� ::r.: .ca+:»: • 1 i • -. �
... . ...:.• � . •�•.,�.
\ � '• :':'r:i?iiii:^ii:;:: + ` ,' � � a�
q 1 / • � i � � � � `, I •'.��°' . E � • • � • i • • ~ • � i � � ' � / •�'�-'
/ `. �� ` ` � • • � ��'. • P �_ 7D • 1 i � ,,: � • � + � ,; �
_{ * � • * � • • - • •.: � ;
� y, • • • � � M • • � • • • A � �;::: � • � t' :
7 _" � __ _ ' ' �I ::;�:: .':�:�i::>:::i^:''�'. ! • �;. .'
�::;�;:::;::: .�..
�� t! ~ ' HAV NVIE CAURT A `EO �� � • • i • � t ;� :�.iii;�;'•i '.;c . �i�"'� �+ � • ,....\
F �� w • WEl! � y 1 ��i; ,..s}`�;......� '. •
• • . � �+'�. � �
�j _ O • r`j�!'�r+. . , , � •
j I ��� � � � { ,�r� � � � ; � � '::'r? �:;Ei:,c. ��: �:'.,,,;- `''• i • • � � � .
� >, r ` • ,#itA,�t�.�....�.�,�.�:,,�i�E«:t�i!�G;;::� _ .':
t � � • - '� T � �~ !; f � • � • :;i.,.�,.,s�!,i,alci�> :::i"�" � � ; :a
.;
�i( • . s ` _ _ . —. � *; « � 1 fi • _ ` � *+ � ti:�:����� � � ` � � ` � +
' "� l �
i • � 1 ,�
� \ • �r � ' — ! � ; � ;•;..
� � �w • t � � �r • _.. • �
� \ � � • _ ,�i�— � • i'i
•� ��2� AONOMAYEN tA E , f� �2g w � _ /"'� .. :::ry:::::::: ROAO • s s - ,
� 3 • • ' ! ' � \ , � _ /r � ':ei? .4`3.! �: �_,Y.,1,'i:. � •.
V W "� / � ?'}+� .' '�iir:l:}il:::�;•„ � • �..
� CIR. � � ��! � � - � ,�i � ;� . ;;',.•}�:i: — � , •
� • s ; a _.. 'z w s _— . . .. `•�,`rt4:: � o r = . ` � � r ..
� r:�•�, `�4i s ;%>ir:�... •,,,::,,_.
• � � a � � � �� _
� . � � . + 4°��-----^_th�'.,4 • � ` 4 1 C ' � _ _23��►'=� — � � ,��•
' r� ! •a�.., 1 - � - �- . jR • , . i.
�• r �� � 2� 'r, m / _ ¢
� . � � • ` "'F/ m ''::;::� r,.. � %` « + •.
t � r <<:"';: i `�' . J ��
@' �'t f` ti ,i<:�,:�:::, � A Y
/ � . � rii�:::...
4�° ' t!�''� � A ii;'l,:,l:ii
�"_ r � �r� �l.'ORO WA � � �;::{.•:�:;%:Y.: �'.•;t:5%'.1�:•:.. � � -
� r�'\ �`�� • �.� S :7+,ri$3t1;�:�:n•.:t,.•'i:i?Y;t�:,. � '
� iiirf,+:.•:r.? . ��
� � * � gjt?.}7!{. �'irir.:.:iiii:;;yf;.+^::F'ryz..
� � O ••�`:e:ifq'�;:.1�r',•r•' ',"i�;' ' ,,�
' � ¢' >irl: ii �`i?�i+:�i :i:i' �i�if;ir::'}i� rj"•' . � �'
� tr,r.?,:.ytri;:'.i:?I.+r'i?ti.,
O i:Ty�:�: YS:.. �.r
�� ti�•','•�:�ii?:�;i:ir:}�::i:ii�i::�:7�:Y;i:a'fir::�j.'r:ie'`r:ir^: �� � :
iq � :�:.yif,::�:)iii't.�ilif:�:fi..:1 �F. :. �� � .
T :�;ie��'ii+:+.i.. ii".7::F?rL,r:;?:%7:7iei�:.. �y�,
.. �� '?:.:�„�'r:.e:er:: .. ��
:i'r:7C';j:t1;; r:'ii:a;f.,'.
: ;i�y:�::. �' �
..._. � , r .. �.,���� '�" ,`�,— �,;
J — — — —��```- — — � _ t�/�! :
� � �.. _ ..._ _ _... � —'9�' ..` ��R't'T7IA' � � � .: ._._ ,
, .. :. . . . , ,: . _ -�*-a-�..-zy
: � ;-; + - ; � ;';; �— . . � s' -: �.,i 'r' •. � .` : �' � �; � : :•� .. - �� ' � ; • . '.
�, . . . • , ' :.� (ji:� . w,y �' . . . •`• ' . , •' :+ . � '•°�• • ` .
�• . �' _ . ' �%/ . . •!/. ":�',�i• . . '+, i . • � . . . . . �•�`' . . . , . ", , :./ • . � � `.
, . . . . • . .. . . . . . . _ . ' e . . �" t;.
ti
SOUTHEAST AREA PARKS '
Friend) �Iills, Hagstrom-Ring, Iiensington (narth outh) p
, ..
CITY OF MEIQDOTA HEIGHTS
i� •
March 15, 1994
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ
SUBJECT: Discuss Status of Workshop Scheduled for March
DISCLTSSION
29th
Recently Council discussed the need to upd te the
Comprehensive Plan for the Highway 55 Corridor in light of the soon
to be reopened Mendota Bridge. At its last meeting, Council
established a joint workshop date with the Planning Commi sion for
Tuesday, March 29, 1994 to initiate these discussions. '
Staff has since contacted the members of the
Commission to inform them of this workshop and we have :
number of the Commissioners will be unable to attend on t;
More specifically, three of the seven Commissioners will x
attend, three will not be able to attend, and one is a
The difficulty with this date appears to be due to its
with "Spring Break" as scheduled by the School Distr:
addition we have learned City Planner John Uban also has a
with the March 29th date.
ALTPRNATIVES
Planning
earned a
is date.
: able to
"maybe".
conflict
ct. In
conflict
Given the above, Council is being asked to consider w�ether or
not to go ahead with the joint Planning Commission wor shop as
originally scheduled. In the alternative, Council should �Consider
rescheduling the workshop to a date aometime in April. �
ACTION REQIIIRED
Council should decide whether or not to hold t
Planning Commission workshop on March 29th as planned. If
workshop should be officially cancelled and an altern
should be chosen.
e joint
Zot, the
te date
Form No.1560 — peoartment oi Tanation Farm No. 92. ] Poucher, M
APPLICATI4N BY GOVERNMENTAL SUBDlVISION F(?R C
TAX-FURFEITED l.ANQ�a
Under L.aws 1941, Chapter 511
In #he Matter of the Application
of Dako�a County .
a'Govemmental subdivision, for a '
Conveyance of Certain Lands.
Ciiy o£ Mendota Heights
Comes now
and alleges: NAME QF SUBQlV18tON
1. 7hat applicant is a(a) Munici:pal.ity
2. Tha#{b) p�rcel No. 27-881Q0-01q-p0, Outlot A, York�on Centre Po
Subdivision. is�necessary far the Citp to establ3sh a st
�
3. That there is situated within applicanYs boundaries in the Gounty of Dakota
certain tax-farfeited land described as foflows:
2?-881QQ-Q10-00 - Yarkton Centre Pointe 5outh
4. That said lands are (c)
vacant apen space adjacent to major h
commarcial.�.y zoned�•land
ANCE QF
e Sou
water
ivision
5. That applicant desires to cabtain said land for the follawing purposes: (d)
Necessary to maintairn�and improve storm water retention in the area
6. That there is need for such lands for the following reasons:
High �unoff•from adjacent h3ghways and business proper�y
Wherefore applicant prays that said iands be conveyed ta it for the use stated herein.
By
It5 Mayor
and
Its Clerk
STATE C7F MtNNESOTA, }
} ss.
County of Dakata �
Gharle's E. Mertensatto and Kathleen�M. Swanson
each being first duly swom, depose and say, each for himself, that they are respectively the lia
and Citv Clerk ofthe �ity of Mendota Heigh
that they have read the faregoing application and knaw the contents thereof; and that the matters
true.
Subscribed and swam to before me this da� of
Notary Pubiic,
My Commisston Expires
;
therein are
19
Minnesota
(a) State facts relat(ve to legal organization.
{b} 3tate facts shawing auihartzatian of acquisttian af tand herei�aRer described by resotution of gaveming body or by vote s, etc., as the case
may require, attaching copies of resalutions, if any. I
(c) Describe nature of tands, use of surroundfng property and oiher similar facts.
(d1 Give statement of facts as to the use to be made of such lands. •
r � .
RESOLUTION OF COUNTY BOARD UPON APPLICATION
WHEREAS the County Board of County, Minnesota, has examined into the
allegations of the application of dated ,
19 , for the conveyance of certain lands therein described; now,
Therefore, be it resolved by the Counry Board of
that it hereby approves said application and recommends that the same be
STATE OF MINNESOTA, )
� ss.
County of
County, Minnesota,
granted.
Counry Board of said County.
0
�� , County Auditor and Clerk of the County Board
of County, Minnesota, hereby certify that i have compared the
foregoing copy of resolufion of the County Board of said County with the original record thereof in the minutes of the
proceedings of said board at a meeting duly held ,19 �
and ttiat the same is a true and correct copy of said originai record and of the whole ther�of, and that said resolution
was duly adopted by said board at said meeting. I further certify that the application referred to in said resolution is
hereto attached.
Witness my hand and seal this
�
m
day of
19 .
Counry Auditor and Clerk of the County Board.
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
St. Paul, Minnesota,
19
County, Minnesota.
Upon due consideration of the within application it is ordered that the same
be and it is hereby rejected granted.
Commissioner of Taxation
BY Deputy
0
�