1995-09-05� �'
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
September 5, 1995 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption
4. Approval of August 1 and August 15 Minutes.
5. Consent Calendar
a.
b.
c.
d.
f.
9•
h:
i.
J•
m.
n.
Acknowledgment of the Building Activity Report for August
Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's Report for July.
Acknowledgment of the August 9th Airport Relations ommission
Minutes.
Acknowledgment of the August 22nd Planning Commission Minutes.
Approve Payment to ISD No. 197 for Sibley Park Maintena�ce.
Acknowledge Receipt of the 1994-95 Community Educatilon Annual
Report .
Adoption of RESOLUT/ON NO. 95-44, RESOLU�T/ON PROV{D/NG FOR
PUBL/C SALE OF �2,170, 000 GENERAL OBL/GA T/ON REFUN /NC AND
/MPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1995.
Approval of Variance Request from St. Thomas Academy to Operate a
Motorized Pontoon on Roger's Lake for the Purpose of Condu � ting Tests
and Obtaining Lake Samples. �
Accept Public Works Employee Resignation and Autho ization to
Complete Posting and Advertising for Position Vacancy.
Approval to Scheduled Public H�aring for 7:30 o'cloc P.M. on
September 19, 1995 for Consi tion of the Heritage Inn pplication
for Limited Service Hotel On-Sa � unday Liquor License.
Approval to Purchase Kensington ccer Field Landscape Im rovements
(Available Tuesday).
Approval to Purchase Replacement of Wood Foot Bridges in Valley,
Wentworth and Roger's Lake Parks (Available Tuesday).
Approval of the List of Contractors.
Approval of the List of Claims.
End of Consent Calendar
6. Public Comments
4
:l
7. Presentation
a.
8. Hearin4s
a.
Presentation from NDC-4 on 1996 Budget and Cable Franchise Extension
Issues - NDC-4 Executive Director Jodie Miller and Mike Sokol
Friendly Hills and Surrounding Areas Assessment Hearing - 7:45 P.M. -
RESOLUT/ON NO. 95-45
b. CAO NO. 95-03: Schaefer - Critical Area Review - 8:00 P.M.
9. Unfinished and New Business
a. Approval of Preliminary Budget and Tax Levy for 1996
a. RESOLUT/ON NO. 95-46, RESOLUT/ON ADOPT/NG PROPOSED
BUDGET
b. RESOLUT/ON NO. 95,47, RESOLUT/ON APPROV/NG TENTAT/VE
1995 LEVY COLLECT/BLE /N 1996
c. RESOLUT/ONNO. 95-�48, RESOLUT/ONAPPROV/NG F/NAL f995
TAX LEVY FOR SPEC/AL TAX/NG D/STR/CT NO. 7 COLLECT/BLE
/N 1996.
b. Discuss St. Paul Water Utility Agreement.
c. Discuss Youth Ballfields at Mendota Plaza.
�
e.
Case No. 95-13: Star Builders - Variance, CUP and Modified Critical
Area Review - RESOLUT/ON NO. 95-49 �
Case No. 95-14: Cruz - Variances.
f. Case No. 95-19: Lane - Wetlands Permit.
9•
h.
i.
J•
k.
I.
m.
n.
�._--
Case No. 95-22: Slater - Wetlands Permit.
Case No. 95-23: Simmonds - CUP for Fill - RESOLUT/ON NO. 95-50
Case No. 95-24: Nelson - Fence Height Variance
,
Case No. 95-21: AT&T Wireless Services - CUP and Variance
f
Discuss Draft MSP Airport Area Community Protection Concept
Package. - -
Discuss Purple Loosestrife Problem.
Discuss Scheduling Workshop with the Planning Commission to Discuss
Highway 55 Corridor on September 28, 1995.
Discuss Rescheduling October 3, 1995 City Council Meeting.
�
10. Council Gomments
11. Adjaurn
Auxiliary aids fnr disab/ed persons are available upon requesf at least 1 Q hours in
advance. /f a notice of /ess than �20 haurs is received, the City of Mend - ta Heights
a
wi!/ make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be assible on
short notice. P/ease contact City Administration at 452- y850 with req ests.
�
�.��t- _.,_.��..u�..�.-�Q �-�,..r--�-�-�
( '���'���-� r» �a�. �;.� �-�`��'--�-��'` --
�
�-,�..� .�..�-�---�.,�
Page No.
August 1,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, August 1, 1995
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of
Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota. Hei�
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following mer
present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Krebsbach and Smith. Councilmember l
notified Council tha.t he would be late. Councilmember Koch had notified Council that
absent.
AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption of the
for the meeting.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
Councilmember Krebsbach moved approval of the
July 18, 1995 meeting with correction.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Minnesota.
s were
�r had
would be
agenda.
of the
CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Smith moved approval of the consen calendar for
the meeting, revised to remove item Sk , Heaver mo fied site plan
approval, to the regular agenda, along with authoriza. on for
execution of any necessary documents contai.ned ther in.
a. Acknowledgment of the Code Enforcement
June.
b. Acknowledgment of the Code Enforcement
July.
c. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the July 12, 1
Relations Commission meeting.
d. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the July 25, 1
Commission meeting.
report for
report for
Airport
Planning
Page No. 4498
August 1, 1995
e. Approval of the 1995-961abor contract settlement between the
city and Teamsters Local No. 320 and authoriza.tion to execute
a formal labor contract agreement.
f. Acceptance of a letter of resignation from Public Works
Maintenance Person Gary Pike and authorization for staff to
begin the process of hiring a replacement. �
g. Adoption of Resolution No. 95-35, "RESOLUTION
ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLL
FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION/REHABILITATION
IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE FRIENDLY HILLS
REARRANGEMENT, HASELBURGER ADDITION,
SIMEK REARRANGEMENT, AND SURROUNDING
AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 92, PROJECT NO. 6): '
h. Adoption of Resolution No. 95-36, "RESOLIJTION
ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT, ORDERING
IMPROVENiENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR SAI�TITARY SEWERS, WATER,
STORM SEWERS AND STREET CONSTRUCTION TO
SERVE IVY FALLS SOUTH (IMPROVEMENT NO. 95,
PROJECT NO. 3)."
i. Approval of a modified critical area site plan to a11ow
construction of a 12 by 15 foot porch addition at 1145 Orchard
Place, along with waiver of the $100 site plan review fee
(CAO 95-01, Home Enhancers).
j. Approval of a modified critical azea site plan to allow
construction of a 10 by 14 foot shed at 1219 Victoria Curve,
along with waiver of the $100 site plan review fee (CAO 95-
02, Burow).
k. Acknowledgment of a letter from Mrs. Ludelia Palmer and
memo from the Public Works Director, and authorization to
release the Palmers from the condition that they complete a lot
survey before construction a new fence which received
wetlands permit approval on August 6(Case No. 95-09).
1. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated August 1,
1995 and attached hereto.
q. Approval of the list of claims dated August 1,1995 and
totaling 252,596.32.
Page No. 4
August l, 1
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
CAO 95-03, HEAVER Council acknowledged an application from Mr. Keith',
modified critical area site plan approval to allow const�
spa tub, deck, porch and enclosed walkway at 1889 Hi
Council also acknowledged an associated memo from
Enforcement Officer Berg recommending approval of
site plan approval and informing Council that the total
� includes construction of swimming pool, which will re
area review by the Planning Comtnission and City Coi
of the amount of dirt which must be excavated. Mr. f
present for the discussion.
ver for
ion of a
r Lane.
the modified
project
quire critical
uicil because
[eaver was
Mr. Heaver stated that the swimming pool permit mus't go to the
Planning Commission if more than 100 cubic yards o fill is
removed, and he estimated that he will be moving be een 90 and
110 cubic yazds of dirt. He asked Council to discuss at issue this
evening rather than going to the Planning Commissio .
Mayor Mertensotto responded the matter must still go the
Commission and Council for review of the retaining 1a11 and pool
enclosure.
Councilmember Krebsbach felt that it is imgortant th�
of project in the bluff azea go to the Planning Commi;
they comply with the ordinance completely. She stat�
wants the applicant to understand that if Council give
tonight, it will only be for the spa tub, deck, porch an�
walkway and the other items must be discussed at the
Commission level.
Mr. Heaver responded that if he moves less than 100
would not have to go through the Comrnission reviev�
moving between 90 and 110 cubic yards, that will be
the swimming paol and will be placed right next to t�
retaining wall will support the dirt that is being taken
if he could get approval this evening if he limits exca
90 yards.
Councilmember Krebsbach responded that a 40 by 40
pool on the top of the bluff is a significant structure. ;
pointed out that there is a natural ravine, and both of t
in the neighborhood have been controversial. She sta
these types
ion and that
l that she
approval
enclosed
�bic yazds he
if he is
ken out for
pool. The
ut. He asked
�tion to only
ot in ground
; also
other pools
i that those
Page No. 4500
August 1, 1995
applicants had to make accommodations to their neighbors in order
to get approvals for the pools. She was concerned that granting any
approvals this evening would lead the applicant to believe that the
pool and retaining wa11 will be approved. She felt that in fairness to
the neighbors, Council should take a look at the project in the most
conservative fashion and that the applicant should follow city
�rocedures as closely as possible.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that if it is deternuned that the excavation
will be less than 100 cubic feet and staff determines that further
review is not needed, the matter should be placed on the August 15
agenda. If the determination is not made, the application must be
processed through the Planning Commission. He stated that there
needs to be a clarification on what is needed as well as the depth of
the pool and the amount of fill to be moved.
PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Peter Beck, from AT&T Wireless Services, stated that AT&T
recently installed an antenna. tower at the intersection of I-494/T.H.
55 in the Mn/DOT right-of-way. He explained that the antenna was
installed with Mn/DOT approval but without the approval of the
city, and stated that he understaod from Mn/DOT that local approval
� was not necessary on Mn/DOT land. He stated that the installation
was about 99% complete when it came to the city's attention and
AT&T closed the site and removed all contracting equipment
iminediately after being contacted by the city. He asked that
Council allow the site to be activated while the planning ap�lication
is being processed through the Planning Commission and Council.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he does not know that AT&T enjoys
priority over any other land owner in the city, and that it should
abide by the same rules as everyone else. He stated that once AT&T
puts its system on line, it can say it does not caze about city
approvals - and anyone else might do the sazne thing by consttucting
something before coming in for approvals. He informed Mr. Beck
that he should have investigated all requirements before the tower
was erected, over a week end, and cannot now claim there is a
hardship and that AT&T should get special consideration. He
recommended that the request be denied.
Mr. Beck stated that he wants it to be cleaz that if approval is granted
to activate the site, there will be no additional construction activity
and he would not assert that approval would mean that AT&T will
be granted approval by the Planning Commission.
Page No. 450
August 1, 199
Councilmember Smith stated that she has questions
and believes Council has the obligation to ask quest
matter comes before them in an open forum.
Mr. Beck responded that AT&T already has a tower
Heights.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that AT&T knew that ;
required when it installed the first tower, therefore it ;
laiown before putting up the new tower that the same
needed. He directed Mr. Beck to follow ordinance uY
PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. & Mrs. James Schueppert informed Council on a
burglary of their home and expressed their anger and
the lack of a secured juvenile detention facility in Da�
and over the way the legal system released the suspec
no bond. They commended the police depariment foi
investigative work and for apprehending the suspects,
is self-defeating for the police to have the suspects ge
The felt that the system is flawed and asked that Cout
the problem, exploring it with the Dakota County aut]
that something is done to develop a better system.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that although the city
jurisdiction over the courts or the county, Council w
Schuepperts in their requests. }
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that she would like
a report on the status of a Dakota. County juvenile det
and information on average bonds required by the cot
Mayor Mertensotto responded that Council has to tal
about the bonds, and can pursue a juvenile detention
County Boazd. Regazding bonds, he stated that Cow
resolution to the county attomey and the judges for tl
district, asking them to look at the bond schedule paz
case. He informed the Schuepperts that Council will
in their efforts. �
Staff was directed to prepare a resolution based on tl�
presented by the property owners with respect to the
�acility, addressed to the chief judge, Dakota County
and the city's legislators.
PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Fred Moore was present to complain about c
which he attributed to development of the lot adj
it the tower
when the
Mendota
a�s were
have
ials were
rustranon over
ota. County
s with little or
its
but felt that it
off so easily.
cil look into
orities to see
s no
support the
city to get
�n facility
to the court
�cility with the
il can send a
: city's
culazly in this
unnort them
comments
judges
;e problems
to his. Public
Page No. 4502
August 1, 1995
Works Director Danielson was directed to send a letter to Mr.
Moore's neighbor and to keep in contact with Mr. Moore.
Councilmember Huber arrived at 8:15 p.m.
BID AWARD - SWANSON Council acknowledged a memo from Civil Engineer Sanders
2ND ADDITION tabulating bids received for construction of the Swanson's 2nd
� Addition improvements.
Mayor Mertensotto sta.ted that the site has terrain and drainage
difficulties, and asked if staff has investigated the qualifications of
the low bidder.
Public Works Director Danielson responded that Kober Excavating
has been a subcontractor but has never completed a municipal
project. He explained that Engineer Sanders contacted past
employers of Kober and they gave Kober very high ratings.
Mayor Mertensotto cautioned staff to alert the contractor at the pre-
construction meeting on where the problem areas may be.
Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption of Resolution No. 95-
37, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWERS,
WATERMAINS, STORM SEWER AND STREET
IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE SWANSON'S 2ND ADDITION
(IMPROVEMENT NO. 95, PROJECT NO. 2)," awarding tlie
contract to Kober Excavating, Inc., for its low bid of $114,304.24,
with the understanding that there will be very close scrutiny and
supervision by the city.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
CASE NO. 95-15, Council acknowledged an application from the Convent of the
VISITATION Visitation for a conditional use permit to construct a gazebo on the
monastery grounds. Council also aclaiowledged associated memos
from Assistant Batchelder and the city planner. Ms. Linda Ostberg,
project architect, was present for the discussion.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he understands that the application
has been before the Planning Commission, which unanimously
recommended approval.
Page No. 4
August 1, 1
Ms. Ostberg stated that the screened gazebo will be j
square feet gross, although it had originally been�cal�
899 square feet.
� Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption of Resol
38, "A RESOLLTTION APPROVING A CONDITIO�
PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONVENT OF THE Vl
CONSTRUCT AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE Or
MONASTERY GROIJNDS," in accordance with the
and specifications on file with the city.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
under 700
.ted at about
ion No. 95-
AL, USE
[TATION TO
plans
CASE NO. 95-06, MN/DOT Council acknowledged an application from Mn/DOT or a
conditional use pemuts for an accessory structure and ling in
excess of 400 cubic yards. Council also acknowledge � associated
staff reports.
Mr. Jack Pirkl, Mn/DOT Maintenance Engineer, expl
proposed 80 by 125 foot salt storage facility is intend�
existing salt shed of about 30 by 120 feet. He explait
Mn/DOT is required to cover salt and sand, and the p�
capacity will be 3,400 yards. He stated that a canopy
installed as well, so that all of the material can be cov
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the Planning Commissi
concem about the height of the lighting poles. He ask
lights will be on, and expressed concern about casting
the Mn/DOT site.
Mr. Pirkl responded that the lights will only be on dur
and ice periods, and stated that Mn/DOT will agree to
on site as much as possible. He informed Council tha
Planner is agreeable to the type of lights proposed. R�
question from Mayor Mertensotto about the structure'
stated that it will be steel siding, probably in an earth �
can be any color Council desires.
Public Works Director Danielson informed Council
Planning Commission did not address colors but su�
shucture match the existing Mn/DOT building.
Mayor Mertensotto suggested that perhaps the stn
color rather than dark brown to match the e�cisting
ied that the
to replace an
that
iosed storage
.11 be
expressed
when the
ht outside
ng the snow
iirect the light
the City
aponding to a
exterior, he
�ne color, and
the
ed that the
be a sand
in�. 1VIr.
Page No. 4504
August 1, 1995
Pirkl sta.ted that Mn/DOT would prefer that the color not be light,
for maintenance reasons. '
Councilmember Smith asked if salt corrodes the steel and if
Mn/DOT has a maintenance program to prevent corrosion.
Mr. Pirkl responded that they try to keep the facilities clean to avoid
corrosion. With respect to color, he stated that he would be happy to
come to the city staff to get recommendations on color. He also
stated that he would agree to a condition that the lights will only be
on during the winter months. .
Mayor Mertensotto asked if Mr. Pirkl is aware of the grass seed
mixture recommendation of the planning consultant.
Councilmember Smith referred to the Planning Commission
recommendation that the light poles be as short as possible. She
stated that, without interfering with the work being done at the site,
the city would still like the poles to be as short as possible.
Mr. Pirkl responded that if the poles are high, Mn/DOT can
minimize the number of lights that will be needed He stated that
there is very little dif�usion ofFthe property and the lights are the
standard cobra head type used by Mn/DOT, which will direct the
light down and outw ` to the Mn/DOT property. He informed
Council that there az 40 ght poles on the upper level of the site
now, and the propos ould add four poles of the same type.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that it would be to argue that the
new lights should be lower if there aze akeady 40� les on the site.
Councilmember Smith stated that there is a lot of light on the
Mn/DOT property and pointed out that there are residences in the
azea, across Pilot Knob.
Mr. Pirkl stated that the storage shed would be at the old T.H. 13
level, which is about 15 to 16 feet lower than the main building. He
stated that the lights would be around the perimeter of the parking
lot for a working area and they are a combination of photo cell and
switch lighting. He stated that when Mn/DOT has the need for
loading, the lights will be switched on, and agreed that they will
only be used when the salt storage facility is being used.
Responding to a question from Councilmember Smith, Mr. Pirkl
stated that if the lighting is more than adequate for the site or creates
problems for the area residences he will come back to Council to
discuss the matter.
Page No. 4
August 1, 1
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that she would like �tO see the
landscaping be trees that are more substantial, and woiild prefer that
they not include poplar. She informed Mr. Pirkl that �ouncil has
asked private businesses to invest in plantings and wol d like
Mn/DOT to do something compatible.
Councilmember Huber moved adoption of Resolutio No. 95-39, "A
RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL U E PERMIT
FOR FILL AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT �
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE TO ALLOW A SALT
SHED AT 2229 PILOT KNOB ROAD," with the con
pole mounted lights e used only when the salt storage
that the paint color be approved by city staff; and that
landscaping plan be revised to include species other tl
poplars are not to be used as a specified tree in the lan
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
TREE PRESERVATION Council acknowledged a memo from Assistant Batch
revised proposed tree preservation ordinance. Counc.
acknowledged letters from Bernard Friel, Robert Prio
and Gail Crecelius regazding the proposed ordinance,
and proposed ordinance language from Sten Gerfast.
Batchelder informed Council that everyone who had �
interest in the matter at the last Council meeting was :
ordinance proposal would be on this evening's agencl
Councilmember Huber stated that the proposed o
revised to address only properties of two acres or
that if a permit is issued for tree removal people `
replace the tree that is removed He asked why rE
required.
Assistant Batchelder stated that in the case of prope�
acres no permit is required, therefore replacement w
required. He further stated that in the case of lazger
would have to determine the impact of tree removal
pazcels, which gives the city the opportunity to requ
where removal does impact neighbors.
�s that the
is in use;
poplar and
�aping plan.
der and
also
Chris Riley,
nd a letter
a an
that the
�ce has been
and states
be asked to
ment is
s under two
.d not be
�cels, the city
adj acent
replacement
Mayor Mertensotto stated that his main concern is that trees aze
finite and die or can come down in strong winds. He �tated that in
his neighborhood many trees have grown up on lazge�pazcels and
are not particularly desirable, such as cottonwoods an� boxelders.
Page No. 4506
August 1, 1995
He pointed out that the ordinance stipulates not only that people
cannot cut down trees, but if they do, they not only have to pay for
tree removal but also must replace the trees.
�- Mr. Batchelder responded that the first draft had a�lengthy list of
species, good trees versus scrub trees, but that level of specifics has
been removed in the current draft. He explained that the current
draft does include a waiver where someone can proof it is not
necessary to replace a tree because it is an undesirable, or scrub, tree.
He pointed out that there is no permit fee, nor is there a requirement
� for Planning Commission or Council approval. He infarmed the
audience that there is no proposal to hire a forester.
Ms. Kathleen Mahoney, legal counsel for Mr. & Mrs. Robert Ridder,
stated that the Ridders are concerned by the ordinance because it is
an attempt to manage private properiy. She stated that the Ridders
own one of the largest undeveloped tract in the city, and when they
purchased the land many years ago, there were very few trees on it.
She stated that the Ridders should have the right to decide how to
use their property and its resource, and pointed out that the
ordinance imposes a burden on the land owners. She further stated
that there is much micro-management in the ordinance because there
will be review given by the Council and Planning Commission, and
it requires replacement at the sole discretion of the city if there is a
�visual impact. She informed Council that the Ridders feel that it is
inappropriate for the city to adopt a tree:preservation ordinance, and
she felt that the ordinance reads as an improper restriction on the
rights of property owners. She stated that the main purpose of the
ordinance is to maintain a look or feel, not to control soil erosion or
cazbon dioxide, etc. Ms. Mahoney stated that the Ridders strongly
ask Council to reconsider whether the city wants to micro manage
individual property owner rights.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that she has spoken to Mrs.
Ridder, and Mrs. Ridder felt that it makes sense to have something
in the city ordinances to prevent clear cutting.
Ms. Mahoney responded that the Ridders have been slrong
supporters of the city and will continue to support it, and she felt that
if the ordinance would speak to cleaz cutting only it would be a
different matter.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that what she is most interested in
is that the city have a way to prohibit clear cutting of undeveloped
property. She further stated that she understands there is an
agreement in the superblock not to cut trees, but she was concerned
Page No. 450
August 1, 199
about what would happen when one of the owners s
informed Ms. Mahoney that she would like Council
the property owners to arrive at some level of protec
Mayor Mertensotto sta.ted that he has spoken to Mrs.
that he feels she is concerned that once an ordinance
Ridders would have added expense because of what ;
want. He further stated that perhaps Mrs. Ridder's �
azgument to him was that there has not been a definil
ordinance in the past and now the city is 85 to 90% d
informed the audience that the current tree cutting m�
expires on September 1. He asked City Attorney Ha
extend the moratorium just in the cases of lazger und�
acreage, independent of zoning, and continue the mo
against clear cutting.
Attorney Hart responded that statutes relating to mor<
much discretion, further stating that a moratorium mL
general planning matter. He did not think that there �
problem in extending the moratorium, as Council is e
city-wide planning issue. He informed Council that t
a moratorium could easily be in effect for 18 months.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Council is trying to v
reasonable solution and would like input from the R
explained that the moratorium would have to be ext�
Council meeting or it will end without an ordinance
Mr. Sten Gerfast stated that the city is about 95%
developed without a tree ordinance in place. He �
either dispense with the proposed ordinance or co
he has proposed.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the language proposed
implies that adjoining land owners have veto power o
He suggested that staff rework the draft ordinance for
meeting, possibly applying it to any parcel that could
Councilmember Smith suggested that it apply to
undeveloped or subdividable.
Mr. Gregory Lee, Executive Director of the Dodge N
stated that the center has 171 acres of land which is z�
was concerned about what the proposed ordinance po
nature center, stating that the nature center board and
over the past year, started to seriously investigate wh�
;. She
consult with
idder, and
adopted the
ighbors might
�t compelling
e tree
-eloned He
if Council can
riums allow
relate to a
uld be any
aged in a
ler state law
out a
rs. He
3 at the next
.oped and
that Council
r the language
y Mr. Gerfast
tree cutting.
ie next
� subdivided.
that are
Center,
R-lA. He
s for the
to do with
Page No. 4508
August 1, 1995
the property and the plan is to do active restoration. He stated that
the ordinance would prohibit the center from clear cutting and
prohibit them from removing more than six 4" diameter trees in a
year. He showed Council a six to seven inch buckthorn which has
been taken out because buckthom is very destructive to wildlife
habitat. He explained that there is a backlog of 25 years of letting
the properly grow wild and stated that he does not relish having to
come to the city every time the nature center wants to remove a
buckthorn or boxelder, etc. He explained that the nature center is
trying to return the land to native species.
Councilmember Smith stated that Mr. Lee is talking about forestry
management, and she felt that this could be worked out in the
ordinance.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that if the nature center is
planning to bring its property back to a prairie she would like them
to consider keeping a buffer to the Copperfield azea. She asked Mr.
Lee to see what the nature center would be comfortable with in
terms of clear cutting and perimeter buffer.
Mr. Lee responded that the center would like it land to be considered
as a different type of property and subject to different consideration.
Mr. Stan Linnell, 1407 Cherry Hill Road, stated that he is pleased
with the ordinance revisions. i
Administrator Lawell informed Council that Councilmember Koch
phoned him to ask that he inform Council that she feels that the
ordinance is still more inhvsive and has a greater level of detail that
she desires, but she agreed that there needs to be some wording on
clear cutting.
FINA MART/OASIS Council acknowledged a memo from Assistant Batchelder regazding
continued discussion on the request from Fina Mart for a change in
its sign face. Mr. Chuck Phillips, from Oasis Markets, and Mr. Jim
Nelson, contractor for the Fina remodeling, were present for the
� discussion.
Mr. Phillips stated that Twin City Stores is an operating company
that purchased 45 FINA stores last year - and operates them under
the name of Oasis Markets.
Mayor Mertensotto informed Mr. Phillips that Council is concerned
that there is a Tom Thumb convenience market within 100 feet of
the Fina station. He stated. that Tom Thumb wanted to install gas
Page No. 450
August 1, 199
pumps in the past but Council said no because there �
station next door. When Fina asked to expand into a
store, Council told them that it did not want a market
with Tom Thumb. He informed Mr. Phillips that Coi
know what the Fina/Oasis plans aze.
Mr. Phillips responded that Oasis is not Fina. or Fina
independently owned and operated and contracts to s
gasoline. He explained that Oasis is trying to differe
from Tom Thumb, Holiday and other convenience rr
stores.
Mayor Mertensotto informed Mr. Phillips that Mendc
would not allow outside storage. He also asked what
be done to the facility.
Mr. Phillips stated that Oasis operates with the unde�
does not put items outside, and further stated that Oa
by the city's regulations. He informed Council that l
graphic" the exterior of the building with the Oasis c
design. He explained that the Oasis Market will ope:
existing 30 by 60 foot facility and is not asking for a�
what it currently daes. He stated that it will continue
station tha.t sells convenience mazket items.
Mr. Nelson informed Council that.the existing color s
facility that now says Fina and uses the Fina colors w
to say Oasis in white lettering on a blue band with a y
The etcisting Fina sign will say Oasis Market, and one
will say Fina. He stated that the canopy will remain t
trademark red and blue stripe. He explained that all o
Mazkets aze affiliated with Fina, although there is not
contract with Fina and at some time a decision may b�
different brand of gas.
Councilmember Huber moved to approve the issu
permit for Oasis/Fina in accordance with the plan
city, with the condition that there be no outside in
equipment storage or expansion of the market.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
a gas
compete
;il wants to
ut but is
Fina
�te itself
:ets and
Heights
proposed to
�nding that it
o will abide
wants to "re-
�rs and
e within the
exceptions to
beagas
7p on the
1 be ohanged
llow sunburst.
third of it;
e Fina
the Oasis
, life-long
made to sell a
of a sign
utted to the
�rv or �
SUNFISH LAKE OUTLET Council acknowledged a memo from Engineer Mogan regarding the
proposed joint powers agreement for the Sunfish Lake gravity outlet.
Page No. 4510
August 1, 1995
Sunfish Lake City Engineer John Gorder was present for the
discussion.
Mr. Gorder informed Council that the WMO plan identifies allowing
an outlet from Sunfish Lake to control the lake level so as not to
endanger property on the west side of the lake. He stated that the
agreement relates to operating conditions, indemnification of
Mendota Heights from claims by property owners around the lake,
and also if Mendota Heights exceeds its capacity it has the power the
close the valve to not allow any water into Mendota. Heights. He felt
that the conditions of the proposed joint agreement aze favorable to
both communities.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Council wants to be cooperative so
long as it does not cost the city anything.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that she wants to be very cleax
that there would be no damages if Mendota Heights ponds aze at
capacity and Mendota Heights wants to close the valve, which may
cause a problem for Sunfish Lake property owners. Mr. Gorder
responded that there is indemnification in the agreement.
Councilmember Smith was concerned over section 6.1, stating that
the section apparently means that if Mendota Heights reaches
capacity it has to accommodate Sunfish Lake as well.
Mr. Gorder responded that the language means that if Mendota.
Heights reaches capacity it does not have to accominodate Sunfish
Lake.
Attomey Hart stated that the key is whether Mendota Heights is
required to do something further to increase its capacity if the
existing design capacity is exceeded..
Public Works Director Danielson stated that this is not a WMO
project and he thinks the comments are very appropriate. He
explained that Sunfish is within the Lower Mississippi WMO and
the WMO has given its blessing to the project. He stated that should
the Mendota Heights system for some reason have to be expanded
downstream because the Sunfish Lake water is contributed to the
system, Sunfish would have to contribute to the improvement. He
informed Council that there is a valve on the outlet and Sunfish Lake
wants to keep it closed, only opening it when there is a need
Mr. Gorder informed Council that the project plan is in conformance
with the WMO plan and its engineers have reviewed and approved
the plan.
i ..
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Page No. 451
August 1, 199
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that Mendota. Heigt
benefit from the project but certainly the city wants
Councilmember Smith stated that under section 3.1
expenses for tasks performed under 3.1 shall be rein
Sunfish Lake payments to Mendota Heights. She fe
Mendota. Heights costs go beyond those tasks, inclu
deprecation, administration and other costs, and she
sure that all costs are covered. She sta.ted that the st
costs should include the other city costs for permits
equipment use.
Public Works Director Danielson responded that
covered under the agreement.
Mayor Mertensotto did not feel Council will be ready
agreement until it is reviewed by legal counsel, but ca
plans and specifications so that the project will not be
Councilmember Smith asked if water will all come in
Mendota Heights system. Public Works Director Da�
responded that the valve can be incrementally opened
Lake is asking Mendota Heights to operate the valve.
Councilmember Huber moved to approve the Sunfish
overflow system which entails construction and utiliz�
the city's drainage system and reserve action on the jc
agreement pending review and recommendation by th
Attorney.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the C�
Councilmember Smith moved that the meeting be adj
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
TIlVIE OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:40 o'clock P.M.
Kathleen M. Swanson, City
will not •
cooperate.
�sts and
ursed by
that the
ited to be
�rd hourly
out of city .
costs are
� approve the
approve the
eld up.
xush into the
Sunfish
,ake gravity
ion of part of
it powers
City
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCI
•�_ =
Concrete/Masonry Co�tractor License
Broin Brick, Inc.
DayCo Concrete Company, Inc.
Petron Masonry
Excavatiag Contraator License
DLR Fsxcavating, Inc. .
S.R. Stevens Excavating, Inc.
Gas Pi�ing Contraetor'License
Bruce Nelson Plumbing & Heating Service
AYAC Contraetor License
Albers Sheetmetal & Ventilation
General Contraetors Licease
Fine Line Design �
Hansen Bros. �Fence & Construction
�
�
Page No. 4512
August 15, 1�95
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regulaz Meeting
Held Tuesday, August 15, 1995
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of
Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota. Hei�
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The followirig
present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Huber, Koch, Krebsbach and Smith.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CONSENT CALENDAR
;
Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption of the
for the meeting.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
�
4
Councilmember Krebsbach moved approval of the co
for the meeting, revised to move item 4k (Mendota L:
permit request) to the regulaz agenda, along with autt�
execution of any necessary documents contained ther
a. Acknowledgment of the Fire Department monthly
June.
b. Acknowledgment of the Fire Department monthly
July. ,
Minnesota.
were
c. Acknowledgment of receipt of the Dakota Allianc� for
Prevention's annual achievement report for 1994-1 95.
d. Acknowledgment of receipt of the following infon
the Northern Dakota County Cable Commission: l`
annual audit report for 1994; draft NDC-4 and ND
budgets; unapproved NDC-4 meeti.ng minutes fron
1995, and direction to staff to schedule formal con
the draft 1996 budget for the September 5 Council
e. Acknowledgment of the proposed assessment roll
Hills Addition improvements along with memos f
Engineer Mogan regarding recommended assessn
and driveway information.
agenda.
calendar
sign
xon for
for
for
ation from
�C-4
TV 1996
July 13,
deration of
�eeting.
�r Friendly
m
it revisions
Page No. 4513
August 15, 1995
f. Authoriza.tion for payment of $3,929.77 to Savanna Designs
for landscape design for Ivy Falls Park.
g. Approval of payment for commissioner fees and easement
payment related to the Eric Miller easement condemnation.
h. Approval of a request from the Convent of the Visitation
School to reserve the Roger's Lake and Marie Park tennis
courts from August 14, 1995 until October 24, 1995, from
3:15 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
i. Authorization for the issuance of a building pemut to allow
exterior building changes to the Fazmer's Insurance building
located at 800 South Plaza Drive.
j. Acknowledgment of a letter from Independent School District
197 Community Education regarding an overview of the
Community Education prog�rams and occupancy at the Metro
II building, 1300 Mendota Heights Road, and authoriza.tion for
extension of the School District's special non-conforming use
permit for another year.
k. Aclrnowledgment of a memo from the City Administrator
regarding the West St. Paul dispatching service agreement and
approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Dispatch Services
Agreement dated March 15, 1983, along with authorization for
its execution by the Mayor and City Clerk.
1. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the August 8, 1995 Park
and Recreation Commission meeting.
m. Approval of the issuance of a two-day on-sale 3.2 malt
beverage license to St. Peter's Church for September 16 and
17, 1996 in conjunction with its annual Father Galtier Days,
along with waiver of license fee.
n. Approval of a Contract for Use of Fire Safety House with the
City of Rosemount in conjunction with the Mendota. Heights
Fire Prevention Open House on October 14, 1995, along with
direction to staff to notify the city's insurance carrier to name
the City of Rosemount as a co-insured on the city's liability
insurance policy during the term of the contract.
o. Adoption of Resolution No. 95-40, "RESOLUTION
APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR
Page No. 45 4
August 15, 1 95
IMPROVEMENT TO SERVE IVY FALLS SO'
(IMPROVEMENT NO. 95, PROJECT NO. 3)."
p. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated
1995 and attached hereto.
�
q. Approval of the list of claims dated August 15,1
totaling $947,019.96.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
15,
and
MENDOTA LIQUOR SIGN Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from Cbde
Enforcement Officer Berg regarding an application fo sign permit
for Mendota Liquor.
Council expressed concern that the proposed three foo't tall capital
letters are too large and simply using the word "liquo ' does not
give the facility an identity.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that the sign seems o be
unusually lazge and it should be proportionate and in �eeping with
the other signage in the center.
Mayor Mertensotto suggested that the matter be tabled
owner be asked to come back with a sign more consist
others in the,sign band.
�
Councilmember Huber was concerned over what basis
be for denial if the proposed sign is consistent with the
ordinance and shopping center sign policy.
Administrator Lawell stated that the sign is inconsister
composed of all capital letters yet appears to conform 1
criteria, however this does not preclude Council from c
matter with the owner.
and the
,nt with the
Councilmember Smith moved to ta.ble action on the si
September 5.�
Ayes: 5 Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
Nays: 0 ;
It was the corisensus to authorize the Mayor to approve
permit if there is an emergency and the owner wants to �
store before September 5 and it can be proven that the si
is consistent with others on the building.
i -
would
in that it is
the sign
�cussing the
permit to
sign
n the
letter size
Page No. 4515
August 15, 1995
PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Sten Gerfast was present to reiterate his opposition to a tree
preservation ordinance.
PARK CELEBRATION Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser, staff coordinator for the fourth annual
. city park celebration, was present to report on the success of the
1995 Celebrate Mendota Heights Parks! event held on July 22, 1995.
Mrs. Blaeser recognized the volunteers, contributors and staff
members who participated in the success of the celebra.tion.
Mayor Mertensotto expressed Council's appreciation and
commendation to Mrs. Blaeser and all who participated in financing,
preparing for and conducting the celebration.
PARK IMPROVEMENTS Council acknowledged a memo from Parks Project Manager Guy
Kullander regarding installation of cut stones at North Kensington
and Ivy Park and installation of overlook and brick pavers at North
Kensington Pazk.
Mr. Kullander informed Council that he contacted five firms to
solicit quotes for the work, however only one bid was received. He
stated that the bid of $11,710 from KCI Construction is well within
the budgeted estimate of $10,000 to .$15,000 and expressed
confidence that the firm can accomplish the work detailed in the
approved landscape plans. He sta.ted that he has received good
references from firms KCI has worked for, and one of the references
was for a job which was very sunilar to the work to be done for the
city. He explained that the stones were a gift from Acacia Park
Cemetery, some of them from the old Ramsey County Courthouse,
and the heaviest weighs about 1,800 pounds. He stated that Council
could either award the bid to KCI or wait and hope that another bid
comes in. He informed Council that the stones must be installed
before any landscaping can be done.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that while there is a possibility
another bid may come in, it could be higher than the KCI bid. He
stated that if the bid awazd is delayed, the work will probably not be
done on time to get the landscaping completed this fall.
Councilmember Smith stated that it appeazs that quite a bit of
grading needs to be done. She stated that she wants to be sure that
installing the stones will not constrain the grading plan and asked if
grading must be done where the stones will be placed.
Mr. Kullander responded that the grading in the azea of the stones is
minor and there should not be a problem, but the stones can be
moved if necessary.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CURLEY ADDITION STREET
IMPROVEMENTS
Page No. 45
August 15, 1
Councilmember Krebsbach moved to authorize the i
purchase order to KCI Construction in the amount o:
installation of cut stones at North Kensington Park a
installation of overlook and brick pavers at North Ke
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the purpo�
continued public hearing on proposed Curley Additio
unprovements. Council acknowledged a memo from
Mogan, along with an improvement option fact sheet
questionnaire which had been prepared by city engine
distributed throughout the Curley neighborhood by M
and Mr. F.B. Daniel.
Engineer Mogan gave a brief history of the proposed �
informed Council and the audience that he and the Pu
Director had met with Mr. Ayers and Mr. Daniel, and
suggestion prepared the fact sheet. He reviewed the f
which described highlights and funding on the four pc
improvement options: total street reconstruction (opti�
street reconstruction (option 2); bituminous overlay (c
no improvement project (option 4).
Mr. Dave Ayers, 2121 Theresa, sta.ted that he and Mr. l
eight other neighbors distributed the fact sheet and soli%
signatures on the questionnaire to all of the households
neighborhood. He explained that there aze 98 househo
93 homes in the addition, two homes that face Lexingtc
yards adjacent to Cullen Lane and three vacant lots. HE
Council that the volunteers attempted to get signatures
husbands and wives and to the best of his knowledge e�
the 98 households had an opportunity to sign the surve�
that eleven did not respond, and of the 87, or 89% of th
did sign the survey. Of the totals, 7% (6 households) f�
nothing, 11% favor bit�zminous overlay (10 households
limited reconstruction (6 households), 75% favor total
reconstruction (65 households). He presented a color c
sutnmary of the survey responses to Council.
aance of a
11,710 for the
Ivy Park and
;in�ton Park.
of a
street
�d project
ing and
David Ayers
ject and
c Works
their
sheet,
1); limited
on 3); and
and
n the
ds affected,
i but have
informed
ry one of
He stated
households,
or doing
7% favor
Mayor Mertensotto stated that one of the things that is real concem
is heavy trucks like rubbish hucks causing damage. He stated that
he would like Council to consider in the future dividing e city into
zones and issuing licenses to one hauler for each zone s� that trucks
are not in and�out of neighborhoods several times a day evera.l days
Page No. 4517
August 15, 1995
a week. He expressed Council's appreciation to Mr. Ayers for his
efforts, and stated that he feels that complete reconstruction is a wise
choice.
Mr. A1 Price, 2106 Patricia, stated that everyone should be aware of
the fact that Patricia is 30 feet wide and there aze many children in
the neighborhood and there are no sidewalks. He felt that improving
and widening the streets will increase the speed of traffic and make
them less safe for children. He stated that there are only two exits
from the neighborhood, one of which is Patricia, and there is a great
deal of traffic past his house. He informed Council that he objects to
the project and does not think it is being handled in a business like
manner since the estimated per lot costs have changed. He asked for
an exact figure on what the project will cost.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he feels it is totally inconsiderate of
neighbors to drive at lugh speeds through the neighborhood and he
asked the residents to be more considerate and careful. He explained
that there is nothing the city can do to reduce the speed limit, as state
statutes establish the speed limit in residential neighborhoods at 30
miles per hour. With respect to anticipated costs, he explained that
the project has not yet been ordered, nor have plans and
specifications and bids been requested. He stated that if Council
orders the project, the engineering staff will be directed to prepare
plans and then go to bid and an assessment hearing will be
conducted after the project is completed. .
Mr. Price stated that the original street was supposed to be 2" but
was one and one-half inches, and if that lasted many yeazs a three
inch bituminous street should last forever. He felt that if the street
had been maintained better they would have held up better. He
stated that he wants to be sure that the new streets will be maintained
at city cost and asked who will be responsible for replacing curb that
is knocked out by snow plows.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that any curbing repair would be paid
by the city and the streets will be seal coated on a regular schedule
of once every five to seven years. �
Responding to an audience question, Engineer Mogan reviewed the
project time schedule, explaining that if it is approved, construction
would begin in May of 1996 and should be completed in September.
Regarding the increase in the estimated cost per lot for the
bituminous overlay project ($1,500 to $1,700), he stated tha.t the
original $1,500 estimate was given two years ago by the former
engineer as a quick estimate based on Friendly Hills cost estimates.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 45�8
August 15, 1 9
He explained that he has done an actual cost estimat� on each of the
options and the estimates he came up with aze conta'� ed in the fact
sheet which was distributed to the neighborhood an also in his
feasibility 'report.
Mr. Price stated that existing Patricia Street is off of
Mayor Mertensotto responded that the city will wo�
neighborhood and will straighten the stxeet if it can
Councilmember Krebsbach asked if Mr. Price's vac
extension of the Pilney lot aze buildable. Public W�
Danielson responded that the lots meets the 70% re
Zoning Ordinance and are therefor buildable.
centerline.
vith the
done.
lot and the
Director
ement of the
Mayor Mertensotto stated that in the past Council has� considered
requests for assessment deferments. He pointed out at interest
accumulates on the unpaid deferment balance until th assessment
becomes payable - when the property is sold or devel ped. He
informed the audience that anyone wishing to request a deferment
must do so in writing.
Responding to a question from Councilmember Hub
Mogan stated that curbing on William Court is plazu
;
Responding to a question from Mr. Price regarding t
Treasurer Shaughnessy stated that the County Asses
on resales in the azea, and if over three yeazs there is
the sale prices in the azea, the assessor will likely inc
values.
Engineer
increases,
relies strictly
increase in
�se property
Mr. Price commented that it makes little sense to put ore money
into the properties when they are losing value because f air noise.
s
Responding to a question from Mr. Bemard Carlson, T easurer
Shaughnessy stated that if the project is ordered and co�istructed, an
assessment hearing will be held in the fall of 1996 and 1 payment
of assessments can be made without interest for thirty ys after the
assessment roll is adopted. The assessment roll would e certified to
the county thirty days after adoption, and the first insta.�lment would
become payable with property taxes in 1997. �
There being no further questions or comments, C
Huber moved that the hearing be closed.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
�
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 4519
August 15, 1995
Councilmember Huber moved adoption of Resolution No. 95-41,
"RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT,
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET RECONSTRUCTION
AND REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE
CURLEY'S VALLEY VIEW ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO.
93, PROJECT NO. 4)."
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that because of the limited access
to the neighborhood, the project should be carefully managed so that
there is an exit that is not under construction. She also asked sta.ff to
work closely with the neighborhood on the starting date to
accommodate their needs. She asked if trees can be provided from
the city's tree farm for neighborhood tree planting.
Public Works Director Danielson responded that the tree farm is
depleted, and adding boulevazd trees to the project will increase the
cost (about $200 per tree).
Mayor Mertensotto suggested that perhaps the city could ask the tree
program contractor for a discount for residents in the Curley area
who wish to add boulevard trees.
CASE NO. 96-16, Council acknowledged an application from Mendakota Country
MENDAKOTA WETLANDS for wetlands permit and tree removal permit to allow reconfiguration
of the golf course and construction of a proposed new second hole.
Council also acknowledged a letter from the Corps of Engineers and
reports from the City Planner and Assistant Batchelder. Mr. Robert
McKinley, Mendakota.'s Ground Superintendent, was present for the
discussion.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the area in which the hole would go is
an eyesore now with decayed and damaged trees, and anything the
club does in the azea would be an improvement. He expressed
concern, however, that Council must be sure that there will be
enough acre feet of water detention.
Mr. McKinney responded that Barr Engineering is double checking
to be sure that there will be sufficient detention and is doing a
wetlands survey. He stated that Mendakota intends to improve
every hole in the course over time and would like to eventually
combine the sixteenth and seventeenth holes into one long par 3
hole.
Page No. 45
August 15, 1
Mayor Mertensotto stated that if the proposed proje
diminish the city's storm water holding capacity he
problem.
� Mr. McKinney responded that Mendakota. is asking
contingent on everything in Barr's wetlands survey 1
appropriate. He stated that if more than 400 square' i
in the dredging process mitigating measures will be
explained Mendakota. would like to begin cleaz cuttn
boxelder and scrub brush in the area of the new hole
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Public Works Director Danielson informed Council t
bringing in excess of 400 cubic yazds to a site require
permit, but the cut and fill on the site is balanced, so :
does not need a fill permit. He stated that if there is i
in the wetlands, only the wetlands permit is required.
that the Barr survey is being done to show where the
officially is, and if as the result of that survey filling i
the designated wetlands, Mendakota will have to retu
request a Wetlands Conservation Act Pernut. He sug
Council grant a wetlands permit conditioned that filli
exceed 400 square feet �
Mr. McKinney reviewed the landscape replacement pl
that Mendakota.'s intent is not to begin clear cutting ur
from the club membership is given. He stated that the
deem that next spring is when the hole should be finisl
clear cutting should be done this fall.
Councilmember Krebsbach asked Mr. McKinney to
effort to plant a vegetation buffer if clear cutting occ
club does not go ahead with construction of the new
McKinney responded that he will do so.
Councilmember Huber moved to approve a wetlands
construction of a new Hole No. 2, as proposed with tl
landscape plan, with the proviso that Mendakota will
responsiliility to notify city engineering staff before �
cut and filling so that staff can make a determination
of fill.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
does not
ies not see any
r approval
t are removed
:en. He
of the
is fall.
�t removing or
a conditional
filling done
[e explained
to be done in
i to the city to
�sted that
T Wlll riOt
He stated
approval
ib, may
but that
e some
even if the
,. 1VIr.
:rnut to allow
revised
idertake the
ceeding with
. the amount
CASE NO. 95-17, Council acknowledged an application from General P p for a
GENERAL PLTMP conditional use permit for accessory structure and side azd setback
variance to allow installation of a satellite dish 16 feet om the
Page No. 4521
August 15, 1995
north property line at the General Pump facility at 1174 Northland
Drive. Council also acknowledged associated memos from staff and
the city planner. Mr. Joseph Zwak, legal counsel for General Pump,
was present for the discussion. Mr. Ron Lippert, from Ron's
Satellite Systems, was also present.
Mr. Zwak informed Council that the conditional use pernut would
allow General Pump to locate a satellite dish at the northerly end of
its property, and any other ground level location would also require
a variance. He explained that the dish cannot go on the south side of
the building because of the loading docks and the angle of the
building, and the only other possible ground level location is below
the hill on the east side, which is very unstable. He stated that the
Planning Commission suggested roof-top placement, but the roof
structure is not sufficient to carry the weight of the dish. He stated
that while reconstructing the roof would be possible, it would be
very expensive and the dish would have a visual impact. He
informed Council that General Pump proposes to put in screening on
the north side and some to the east to screen the dish from the
property to the north and T.H. 55. Mr. Zwak stated that the
Planning Commission also discussed fencing, and General Pump
subsequently discussed the issue with the installer, who did not feel
a fence is needed as there is no need to protect people from the dish
because it is very low voltage and there is no reason for security
fencing azound the dish given its location. He stated that General
Pump feels that a chain link fence azound the dish would be
unsightly. Responding to a question, he stated that the 12 foot dish
would be about 14 feet above the ground at its highest point. Mr.
Zwak then reviewed the screening plan which had been submitted,
stating that fir trees will be used to maintain screening year round
and will grow to sufficient height to screen it from any future
building to the north. He explained that the dish will be used to
receive commercial training sessions transmitted by satellite.
Mr. Lippert informed Council that he has installed similar satellite
dishes at 88 state extension service locations. He stated that only 14
of those dishes were roof-mounted and they were the only ones
which have had problems. He informed Council that ground-
mounted dishes are much more stable.
After discussion, Councilmember Smith moved adoption of
Resolution No. 95-42, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SATELLITE DISH
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AT 1174 NORTHLAND DRIVE,"
subject to review and approval of the landscaping plan by the city
planner and with the express understanding that the variance pertains
Page No. 45
August 15, 1
only to the installation of the requested satellite
structures, at the specified location.
Ayes: 5 Cou.ncilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Nays: 0
RECESS Mayor Mertensotto called a recess at 9:55 p.m.
The meeting was reconvened at 10:05 p.m.
CASE NO. 95-02, CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE
CODE/ZONII�TG AMENDMENT
Council aclrnowledged a memo from Administrati
Batchelder regarding a request from Fire Mazshal :
an amendment to the city's Zoning Ordinance to p
wood frame construction in all "B" and "I" zones.
acknowledged a letter from United Properties reg�
proposed aznendment.
Fire Marshall Kaiser explained that the ordinance cw
allows wood frame conshuction, and both the Marric
Heritage Inn are waod frame. He expressed concern
particularly in stair cases and other azeas, and stated �
proposed amendment would prohibit the use of wooc
construction. He informed Council that Bloomingto�
construction materials in its B and I districts to non-c
materials, and this is his long range vision for the cit;
two motels have already been consfructed and there i
for a third.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that if Council gets involv
55 study, where there could be a senior housing proj
the restriction would also apply to the HRA project.
5
and no other
Assistant
iser regarding
ubit the use of
ouncil also
lin� the
Public Works Director Danielson responded that the i
to address industrial zoning, and the zoning far the se�
facility near the shopping center is now low density re
would need to be rezoned to high density residential, �
not be affected by the proposed zoning ordinance ame
explained that residences are not allowed in the B/I zc
further stated that the HRA uses wood frame construc
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he would like to have s
place before something goes forth for a planned senio:
facility in lieu of office/wazehouse space behind the C
building. He asked whether the city would want at le�
stairwells to be Class C materials, stating that the city
want a fire to start in the stair wells.
Administrator Lawell responded that his would
change for multi-family districts.
�ently in effect
t and the
�ver fire safety,
iat the
frame
resiricts all
. He noted that
� the potential
in the T.H.
. He asked if
t has been
housing
�ntial and
;h would
ient. He
He
in
housing
�rporate One
�t the
vould not
an ordinance
Page No. 4523
August 15, 1995
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he feels staff should look at a revision
and Council should put it in place before a project starts.
_. Councilmember Smith stated that she shares the concern regazding
wood frame construction for structures like the Herita.ge Inn. She
stated that one of the United Property concems is that they felt it
might not be necessary for all commercial development. She stated
that if there were an application for a one story restaurant or strip
mall the greater standard would be required.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
DOCK REQUEST
Fire Mazshal Kaiser responded that he feels strongly enough that the
ordinance should be changed so that any future construction would
be non-combustible and Council could then a11ow a variance from
that standard should a restaurant be proposed at some future tune.
Responding to a question from Councilmember Smith about whether
the kinds of exemptions which could occur should be limited, he
stated Class A occupancies, which includes resta.urants, are
exempted in the code.
Councilmember Smith felt that perhaps the ordinance amendment
should specify exemptions rather than including all B/I uses.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that as long as Council has the authority
to grant exemptions, adoption of the proposed amendment would not
be curtailing development. He pointed out that if someone were to
come to Council and show that "budfor" the amendment a structure
would be built, Council could grant a variance. He also asked staff
to look at proposing a similar ordinance change for multi-family
districts, for stairwells, etc.
Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption or Ordinance No. 304,
"AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 401."
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Council aclaiowledged a memo from Public Works Director
Danielson regarding a rock path and dock which have been installed
in the scenic easement on Copperfield Pond at the Willerscheidt
property, 613 Pondview Drive. Council also aclaiowledged a letter
from Mr. Anton Willerscheidt and copies of the scenic easement
quick claim deed and easement description including restrictions.
Mr. Willerscheidt informed Council that he purchased a paddle boat
in 1990 and built a portable three by eight foot dock which he puts
in and out on a seasonal basis so that lus grandchildren can get in
Page No. 45
August 15, 1
and out of the boat safely. He stated that he underst�
someone called city hall to complain about the dock
He felt that the pond is there to enjoy, and pointed o�
use it for canoeing, skiing, skating and hockey. He i
no difference between his dock and hockey nets as b
structures.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that the dock and path
and of high quality but the problem is that all of the p
the homes around the pond run into the center of the �
stated that the developer did not retain an easement o �
pond to the city because the city did not want the liabi
maintenance, but Copperfield Assaciates deeded a pet
easement to the city. He explained that by accepting t
of the homeowners azound the pond became the prima
beneficiaries of the easement and can rely on its condi
not think the city has any ability to abate the restrictio:
easement, which include a prohibition against perman�
temporary stntctures in the easement. He stated that h
a hockey net would be considered a structure unless it
anchored, although there could be a question of interp:
dock is certainly a structure. He further stated that the
hard surface improvements within the scenic easemen�
Willerscheidt lot. Mayor Mertensotto stated that he bE
would defy logic in interpreting the restrictions such tl
not covered. He also did not think the city has the righ
restrictions, and if Council could approve the dock it v
precedent for other structures.
3s that
is summer.
that others
t that there is
h are
re very nice
operiy lines of
�nd. He
convey the
�ity for pond
nanent scenic
ieir deeds, all
�ns. He did
� of the
�t and
did not think
;tation, but a
e are also
along the
.ieves it
�t the dock is
to amend the
ould set a
Mr. Willerscheidt responded that to him it is a matter o€ safety - he
does not want his grandchildren to fall into the pond. �
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Mr. Willerscheidt bo
knowing full well that the easement and restrictions
safety issue did not occur after he moved to the pro�
Councilmember Huber stated that it is a situation whe
were at the site today they would see it is quite grown
were walking through the reeds, they would hardly wl
stops and the water begins. He state that Mr. Willersc
trying to facilitate getting into a paddle boat and some
offended by the dock and is saying it is a violation of �
restrictions.
Councilmember Smith pointed out that the city acce�
conditions and only has the right to change one thing
the property
ted so the
if someone
, and if they
�e the walk
idt is just
.e is
the
� that is the
Page No. 4525
August 15, 1995
topography, but no other conditions. She stated that whether or not
Council agrees with what is being requested, it does not have the
right to allow it. She informed Mr. Willerscheidt that he must get
the consensus of the beneficiaries of the easement.
Mayor Mertensotto sta.ted that a scenic easement cannot be altered or
changed. .
Councilmember Huber asked if the neighbors agreed to accepting
changes to the restrictions, would Council accept that. He stated that
it would ta.ke the consent of everyone to change the restrictions but
the city cannot do so.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the only reason Mr. Willerscheidt is
present is because someone objected. He explained that the primary
beneficiaries are the people who rely on the restrictions that were
placed on their properties and the properties that border on the pond.
He further stated that it is the people who live around the pond who
benefit and if the complaint came from someone who does not live
near the pond, Council still cannot turn their heads.
Public Works Director Danielson stated that the first issue is the
easement that was granted to the city when the land was developed,
� and if Mr. Willerscheidt were to cleaz that hurdle, he would still
have to apply for a wetlands pernut for the temporary dock.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that she thinks the intent of the
easement was that there be a five foot natural shore line around the
pond and that it be a common community asset when it was
developed. .
Mr. Willerscheidt stated that he removed the dock a month ago
when the complaint was made.
SLTNFISH LAKE OU'TLET Council acknowledged a memo from Engineer Mogan along with a
proposed Joint Powers Agreement between the city and Sunfish
Lake for the conshuction and operation of a gravity outlet from
Sunfish Lake. Mr. Tim Kuntz, Sunfish Lake City Attorney, and Mr.
John Gorter, from Bonestro Engineering, were present for the
discussion.
Acting City Attomey Michael Duffy informed Council that he has
reviewed the agreement and conferred with Mr. Kuntz. He reviewed
changes which have been made since the last Council discussion on
the agreement.
Page No. 45
August 15, 1
Administrator Lawell stated that three conditions are
including evidence of easements over private proper
Lake to allow Mendota. Heights access; review and a
interim use permit; and funding by Sunfish Lake for
Mendota Heights legal fees.
Attorney Duffy informed Council that Mr. Kuntz ]
him a draft easement which does not include legal
Adminislxator Lawell informed the Council that Sun
Mayor Tiffany has asked that that the city not be req
legal fees since Sunfish Lake is paying its own legal
Mayor Mertensotto stated that if there is no reimbur
would be spending Mendota Heights money outside
district to benefit people outside of the city's corpor
Mr. Kuntz responded that the agreement will not be h
$500, but it is a question of the two communities ttyi�
the details. He stated that Sunfish Lake has made the
outlet and also asks that it not be charged for legal fee
Responding to a question from Mayor Mertensotto,
stated that he estimates that the legal fees will be ab�
Mayor Mertensotto stated that if the fees are greater
city would be undervvriting the legal expense to revi
powers agreement on behalf of Sunfish Lake.
Councilmember Huber sta.ted that Council would ask
reimbursement if the request had been from a private �
stated that the city is incurring costs for the benefit of
and Sunfish Lake should understand Council's nositic
in Sunfish
►roval of the
� to $500 in
to
Lake
i to pay any
ient, the city
its taxing
limits.
i up for
to work out
quest for the
orney Duffy
$500.
n $500, the
the joint
He
Lake,
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Council can approve the greement
this evening, but the issue would remain open - Council needs to
laiow what the costs aze if they are to be waived.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that she thinks the co � dition over
reunbursement should stand, and if the expenses aze gre ter than
$500, the matter should be brought back to Council.
Councilmember Smith asked if all of the Mendota Hei
reasonable and determinable costs been covered in the
the agreement.
of
Page No. 4527
August 15, 1995
Mayor Mertensotto responded that there is nothing in the agreement
to cover the city's engineering costs.
Administrator Lawell sta.ted that Mendota Heights can bill Sunfish
Lake for the actual costs of operation and maintenance. He
informed Council that Mayor Tiffany believes both that Mendota
Heights receives some benefit by having the agreement in place and
that there is a right under the WMO for Sunfish Lake to construct
the outlet.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that what is proposed is not part of
the natural water course.
Councilmember Smith asked what will happen if Mendota Heights
reaches capacity, if Sunfish has the right to put its drainage into
Mendota Heights.
Public Works Director Dazuelson responded that with the valve on
the outlet, which can be opened and closed by Mendota Heights, and
if the valve is not open during a rainfall event it will not affect
Mendota Heights' capacity at all.
Councilmember Huber stated that Mendota. Heights is financing its
engineering costs and Sunfish should cover all of the Mendota.
Heights legal costs. He suggested that the city bill Sunfish for all
legal fees. ' .
Councilmember Huber moved to authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute the joint powers agreement subject to the
conditions recommended in Engineer Mogan's memo, and to direct
bill Sunfish Lake for all legal expenses.
Ayes: 5 Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Nays: 0
LIAISON OFFICER Council acknowledged a memo from Administrator Lawell
regarding establishment of a police/school liaison officer. Council
also acknowledged a memo from Police Chief Delmont, a memo
� from the City of West St. Paul regazding cost allocations, a copy of
the most cunent Police Liaison Sexvices Agreement, a draft job
description for the position, and a letter from the City of Eagan.
Police Chief Delmont briefly spoke about police issues, informing
Council on the status of a secure juvenile detention facility and the
sta.tus of the investigation of a burglary which was recently brought
to Council's attention.
Page No. 45
August 15, 1
Mayor Mertensotto asked what would happen if We
cannot provide the officer, pointing out that the city
obligated to pay. He stated that the agreement shou
any reason West St. Paul cannot provide an officer i
1995/6 school year, the reimbursement to West St. l
rated to the other parties to the agreement. He furth
the function is not taken care of on a full-time basis
the cost should be pro rated.
St. Paul
ould still be
state that if for
the entire
zl will be pro
stated that if
r any reason,
Administrator Lawell stated that the August 2, 1995 etter from
West St. Paul addresses pro ration of the financial co tribution�
because the program cannot start until the end of Oct ber.
Responding to a question from Councilmember Smit]
qualifications of the officer, Chief Delmont stated hat
POST certified peace officer be in the agreement so t]
individual is not, for exaznple, a community service o
informed Council that he has had experience with the
program in the past and will be watchi.ng very careful
the program is successful. He pointed out that the of1
well to both the students and the faculty.
Councilmember Smith asked if Chief Delmont is con
officer will be employed by West St. Pau1 but will se�
Mendota Heights jurisdiction. Chief Delmont respon
volunteered to provide the officer several yeazs ago u
was first discussed. He sta.ted that he has some serioi
about responsibility, supervision, how arrests will be
he would very much like to have a Mendota Heights �
be the liaison officer, but at the present time there are
officers in the department.
It was the consensus to direct Chief Delmont to
regarding
he asked that
at the
�icer. He
police liaison
y to see that
cer must relate
ned that the
in the
l that he had
i the issue
concerns
ade, etc., and
lice officer
�t enough
TREE REMOVAL Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from As�istant
MORATORIUM Batchelder regarding a proposed, less restrictive, tree r moval
moratorium resolution. The proposed moratorium wo d restrict
clear cutting on large undeveloped pazcels and properti s wluch
could be subdivided.
Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption of Resolu
43, "RESOLUTION ADOPTING A LIMITED TREE
MORATORILTM."
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 1 Koch
No. 95-
�IOVAL
Page No. 4529
August 15, 1995
BUDGET WORKSHOP Council acknowledged a memo from Administrator Lawell
regarding the scheduling of a budget workshop for August 29.
Council also acknowledged receipt of the proposed 1996 budget.
It was the consensus of Council to conduct the workshop at 7:00
p.m. on August 29. ,
COLTNCIL COMMENTS Mayor Mertensotto directed staff to schedule a CounciUPlanning
Commission workshop this fall to discuss the T.H. 55 corridor and
� the Curley property redevelopment.
Councilmember Smith sta.ted that Council should look at the cutting
and filling provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and perhaps extend
the provisions to limit the volume of earth moved on-site as well.
Councilmember Koch stated that the Somerset School trail is
overgrown and the trees should be trimmed again.
Council briefly discussed the North Urban Regional Tra.il and
directed the City Administrator to prepaze an update on the status of
the trail.
Mayor Mertensotto expressed concern about the prol'iferation of
purple la,o�t.s r'ife and asked sta.ffto prepaze a report identifying how
many srtes are mfected so that Council can get a measure of what
kind or program to put in place to address the problem. �
ADJOURN There being no fiuther business to come before the Council,
Councilmember Huber moved that the meeting be adjourned.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: o'clock P.M.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
LIST OF CONTR.ACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY
f � . • i . = -�-y���'�_�
.. - - �-c.._y .. . -.:-
• - • . �
Excavating Contractor License _
J B Diggers, Inc.
Gas Piping Contractor License
Shandley Heating
General Contractors License
Gouette Construction LLC
prvwall Contractors License
Medearis Drywall
Sign Contractors License
J.T Specialties, Inc. dba Identi-Graphics
T0:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMO
0
Date: 8-24-95
�
Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
Paul R. eerg, Code Enforcement Officer ��•�.
Building Activity Report for August 1995
CURRENT MONTN YEAR TO DATE 95
BUILDING
PERMITS: No. Valuation Fee Collected
SFD 3 447,262.00 4,022.71
APT 0 0 0
TOWflHOUSE 0 0 0
CONDO 0 0 0
MISC. 31 176,097.00 3,490.10
C/I 9 53,570.00 977.75
-------------------------------------------i
Sub Total 43 676,929.00 9.490.56 �
TRADE
PERMITS•
Plumbing 4 142.00
Water 4 20.00
Sewer 4 70.00
Heat, AC,
& Gas 25 1,102.00
--------------------------------------------
Sub Total 37 1,334.00
� No. Valuation fee Collected
�
� 20 3,321,158.00 28,772.00 '
0 0 0 ,
4 570,787.00 5,214.01 'I
I 0 0 0
� 239 1,774,329.00 31,151.74 �
57 2,211,328.00 21,824.87 �
------------------------------------a
320 7,877,602.00 86,962.62 �
68 2,569.00
27 135.00
27 472.50
126 8,087.00
•------------------------------------�
248 11,263.50
0
YEAR TO�DATE 94
� No. Valuatiod Fee Collected
I 37 7,210,174 00 59,440.85
0 0 0
0 0 0
10 928,524.00 6,269.18
266 7,534,395�00 57,408.44
41 14,239,169.00 66,501.56
354 29,912,262. 0 189,620.03
99
61
63
174
�------------------
397
t
Licensina: � � •
� � �.
Contractor's • � � .
Licenses 15 . 365.00 � 326 8,150.00 � 310 �
-------------------------------------------+------------------------------------+-----------------
Total 95 676,929.00 10,199.56 � 894 7,877,602.00 10,376.12 �1061 29;912,262
NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, 41ac, and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit,
valuation amounts.
�
7,581.00
305.00
1,102.50
15,228.00
-----------------
24,216.50
' 7,750.00
0 221,586.53
check fee, and
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
TREASURER'S REPORT, JULY 1995
DAKOTA, INC.
Checking Account 1.05%
Savings Account 2.15%
C. D. Rep. 3.00%
Collateral - Bonds
Gov't. �uar.
CHEROKEE STATE BANK
Saving Cert. 8/22/95 @ 3.60%
Collateral - Bonds
Gov't. Guar.
Bank Acc. 6.16% Due 8/17/95
FHLMC 7.23% 12/97 FBS 6.40%
FNMA 6.3% 12/97-95 FBS 5.95%
FHL Mtg. Pool 8% (PRU)
FMLC 7% Mtg. Pooi (PRU) PAC .
FMLC 6 1/4% Mtg. Pool (PRU)
FNMA 6% Pooi (PRU)
FHLMC 6% Pool @ 101.4375 (PRU)
FNMA (1994 Pool) 6 1/2% (PRU)
U.S. Treasury Money Mkt. (FBS)
Gov't. Securities Fund
Zero Cpn T.Bds 7.9% - 2011 (J&M)
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE
Funds Available 12/31/94
Funds Availabie 7/31/94
Rates Money Market
July 30 Bank 3.00%
July 30 FBS 5.58%
LES:kkb
BALANCE
$76,921.60
$583.69
0.00
$77,505.29
$500,000.00
$100,000.00
$13.952.59
$13,952.59
$500,000.00
$100,000.00
$484,514.44
$500,008.00
$500,008:00
$236,920.97
$505,000.00
$418,350.79
$503,180.34
$272,395.56
$267,285.98
$875,629.04
$1,002,470.00
$197,530.00
$5,854,751.00
$7,840,461.20
$4,349,918.49
$1
r ;
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 9, 1995
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commis:
held on Wednesday, July 9, 1995, in the City Council Chambers, 1101
Curve. The meeting was called to order at 8:04 o'clock P.M. The follc
members were present: Beaty, Leuman and Stein. The following mem
excused Olin, Surrisi, Olsen and Fitzer. Also present were City Admini:
Lawell and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Due to the lack of quorum, the approval of the July 12, 1995
tabled until the September 6, 1995 meeting.
PRESENTATION/DISCUSSION
on was
Victoria
wing
�ers were
trator Tom
utes was
Patrice Bataglia, District 3 Dakota County Commissioner, and Jo n Tocho,
Transportation Planner were present to discuss Dakota County's erspecti�
on airport related issues.
Mr. Tocho reviewed an airport flight track and 1990 population
with the Commission.
Chair Beaty stated that Mendota Heights's main concern is noise
and that the air noise be distributed equitably. Commissioner Ba1
stated the County is continuing to monitor and assist Cities affec�
noise. She stated the dual track issue has made more residents i
County aware of the airport relocation issue and many opinions a
concerns have been expressed.
.Administrator Lawell inquired if the Dakota County Board of Comi
has taken a formal position regarding the dual track issue. Mr. Ti
responded no. Commissioner Bataglia stated the issue has been �
especially by the District 1 Commissioner. She stated that she ta
interest with the Mendota Heights' position. She stated she has ;
with Mayor Mertenso.tto regarding this issue on numerous occasic
pointed out to the Commission that the entire City of Mendota He
1
map
�atement
�lia
d by air
Dakota
issioners
ces great
�poken
`ns. She
�ghts is
�
1
not united in its opinion of the dual track issue.
Mr. Tocho stated Dakota County does not want MAC to land bank. He
stated that a position will need to be taken soon as there is a real
environmental concern. Administrator Lawell explained that land banking
entails purchasing property from a farmer and allowing that farmer to
continue to farm the property. Mr. Tocho stated the MAC is looking to
purchase land from farmers and then lease it back to them for farming
purposes. Tocho stated the County is very concerned with impacts to the
environment and the loss of valuable farmland.
Chair Beaty informed Commissioner Bataglia of the Commission's concern
with inequitable air noise distribution turning nighttime operations.
Administrator Lawell stated that the City has been working on trying to get
a crossing procedure implemented. �•
The Commission discussed how the new Global Positioning System may
reduce the width of the corridor. Commissioner Stein pointed out that even
with the GPS system, specific areas will be "hammered" more frequently
with air noise. He stated the Furlong Addition may never see air noise
relief.
Regarding the Dual Track Issue, Mr. Tocho discussed details regarding the
infrastructure and what the impact to taxes may be. He discussed how
commercial development is being handled by the MAC. Mr. Tocho stated
the County is keeping their "eyes" focused on economics. He stated the
County is concerned about losing commercial property off the tax rolls
which would then generate money back to the MAC.
Administrator Lawell inquired about the Community Protection Package.
Mr. Tocho stated the County will not adopt this package. He stated that by
adopting this package, the County would be locked into allowing a new
airport.
Mr. Tocho stated that County wants to be involved with the dual track
planning process. He stated the MAC is not allowing the County to
participate.
Chair Beaty inquired about the City of Hastings' position. Mr. Tocho stated
the City of Hastings does not want a new airport constructed.
Chair Beaty informed Commissioner Bataglia of the Northern Dakota County
Air Noise Coalition. He summarized several topics the Coalition has been
2
e 'J•
r ;
working on. Commissioner Bataglia stated she would like to at
upcoming Coalition meeting. She stated she would inform the
about the Coalition. Administrator Lawell stated he would give
Commissioner Bataglia the list of topics the Coalition has been �
over the past few months. -
ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF VARIOUS
REPORTS/CORRESPONDENCE
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC General
Minutes and Technical Advisors Report for May, 1995.
The Commission discussed nighttime departures in the month of
Beaty stated that Mendota Heights receives 51.4 percent of ovei
during all hours of the day. �
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC General ME
Minutes for June, 1995. Chair Beaty .stated the MASAC acknowl
receipt of the Northwest Airlines letter from the Northern Dakota �
Airport Relations Commission requesting Northwest's cooperation
developing and testing the "Distant" and "Close-In" departure pro
an
Board
on
ng
. Chair
:ting
dged
dures.
Chair Beaty suggested that information be obtained using the ANO� S
system in comparing hushkit vs non hushkit aircraft. Administrato Lawell
stated he would inquire with John Foggia.
,
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Draft Northern Dako �a County
Airport Retations Commission Minutes for June and July, 1995. Chair Beaty
stated he would like to invite John Foggia to a Coalition meeting to do a
presentation on GPS. � -
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Richfield Part 150 Bu�r-Out
Update for July, 1995. �
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the NOISE Newsletter for July,
1995. Administrator Lawell informed the Commission that the May r is not
able to attend the NOISE Conference. . �
As noted in the July NOISE Newsletter, Dr. Stephen L.M. Hockada�
Consulting Services LTD was hired to examine the alternative layo�
Louis Airport is considering. It was noted that Dr. Hockaday has v�
the design of airports throughout the world and specializes in issue
concerning the most effective use of limited airport capacity. The
3
of
s the St.
�rked on
�
Commission felt that this individual may prove to be of help to the City of
Mendota Heights in the future.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of Stop the Noise! and National
Helicopter Noise Coalition Newsletter for June, 1995. -
The Commission acknowledged receipt of various newspaper articles. related
to airport noise. Specifically, the Commission reviewed an article regarding
the tentative agreement being reached on plans to extend Runway 4-22 and
how it will go before four city councils, the MAC and the Met Council. The
Commission noted that the City of Eagan was a part of the mediation
process. Chair Beaty stated that the City of Mendota Heights should have
representation during the mediation process.
NORTHWEST AIRLINES 747 JET FUEL
RELEASE OVER EAGAN
Administrator Lawell briefed the Commission regarding the recent NWA jet
fuel release over the City of Eagan. He stated that MAC representatives
have been to Eagan to discuss this issue.
DISCUSS LETTER RECEIVED FROM NORTHWEST AIRLINES
REGARDING NOISE ABATEMENT DEPARTURE PROFILES
AND NDCARC DRAFT LETTER OF RESPONSE
Administrator Lawell explained that the Northern Dakota County Airport
Relations Coalition recently sent a letter to Mr. John Dasburg of NWA
expressing concern over soon to be implemented departure procedures
affecting aircraft altitude/climb rate. Lawell explained that in July, a
response was received from Mark Salmen, NWA Manager. The Coalition
discussed Mr. Salmen's response and felt that NWA's response did not
adequately address the Coalitions concerns. He explained that the Coalition
agreed to send a subsequent letter. Lawell stated that the Commission
needs to review the letter and give comments.
The Commission was of the consensus that the letter should be sent jointly
with Mayor signatures from all of the Coalition cities. The Commission was
of the consensus that the content of the letter is appropriate and that it
should be sent. The NDCARC will review the final version of the letter at
its August 16th meeting.
C�
c' �
DISCUSS DRAFT MSP ENVIRONS COMMUNITY
PROTECTION CONCEPT PACKAGE
Administrator Lawell explained that the Commission has discusse
of the Met Council as it relates to the Dual Track Airport Planninc
and their on-going analysis of the economic and land use impact:
to expand MSP in its present location would have on surrounding
communities. Lawell explained that the Met Council has been mE
interested cities and state agencies to formulate the "MSP Enviro
Community Protection Package".
Lawell explained that the City Council has not seen the correct dr�
document and that additional information is needed in a lot of aref
stated that the Council may wish to include additional language sli`
choose to ultimately go along with this package. Most notably, tfi
makes no mention of aircraft operational procedures which we w
obviously like to see changed if the airport is to stay in its current
long term. Chair Beaty stated that issues such as noise equity sh �
considered. Lawell stated that the Met Council and the communit
discussing this issue have set a meeting date for September 14, 1
that they would like comments from the City Councils prior to tha
This item will be scheduled for City Council discussion on Septemti
1995.
ADJOURNMENT
I the work
Process
a decision
:ting with
s
ift
�s. He
�ould they
e package
uld
location
iuld be
les group
995 and
; meeting.
�er 5,
There being no further business, the Airport Relations Commissionl
adjourned its meeting at 11:00 o'clock P.M. �
Respectfully submitted,
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
5
V
CiTY OF MENDCITA HEiGHTS
DAKOTA GOUNTY, MlNNESQTA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 22, '! 995
The regular meeting of the Mendata Heights Planning Commissian was field on
Tuesday, August 22, 1995, in the City Ha[I Cauncil Chambers, 9101 Vi�toria
Curve. The meeting was called to order at 7:33 o'clack P.M. The follo mg
members were present: Dwyer, Koll, Friei, l.orberbaum and Duggan. �
Commissioners Betlej and Tilsen were excused. Also present were Pubhc Works
Director Jim Danielsonr PEanning Consuitant Jahn Uban, Administrative �ssistanl
Kevin Bafichelder and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser. �
APPROVAL O� MINUTES
Commissioner Duggan moved approval of the Juty 25, 1995
corrections.
Commissioner Lorberbaum seconded the mo#ion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
CONTiNUED HEARtNG:
CASE NC?. 95-36:
SALMEN -
SUBDIV151QN AND VARlANCE
As requested by Mr. and Mrs. Satmen, of 1 fi94 Dodd Road, Chair
moved to continue the public hearing until October 24, 1995.
Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. ,
wifih
Cammissioner Quggan directed staff to inform Mr. and Mrs. Salme of the
continuance and to also inform the Salmen's that they shauld atte pt to
address #he folEowing issues be#ore the Planning Commission farm Ily
reviews the application in October .
1. That easements be required for all utilities including a ten 1
access and utility corridor along the southern property line
the existing !ot and the tot proposed to be subdivided.
1
public
both
r
2. Private easements should be amended to incorporate and coordinate
snow plowing, rights of access by a fourth lot, and future conversion
to public right-of-way for the fifty foot access strip.
3. . That an appropriate turn around be designed and included on the
proposed subdivision plans with the provision of an easement of the
. same dimension as a public cul-de-sac at the end of the private road.
This private easement may have to include the Boyte property as
well.
4. Confirm with the Fire Department that absolute minimum
requirements for safe access, grade of street, all weather surface,
width of street section and dimensions of an adequate turnaround for
emergency vehicles.
5. Inclusion of a building pad on the proposed new lot that demonstrates
grading changes and impact on the wooded characteristics of the lot.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
CONTINUED HEARING:
CASE NO. 95-13:
STAR BUILDERS -
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCE
CRITICAL AREA REVIEW
Chair Dwyer introduced this case by stating that at their July 22, 1995
meeting, the Planning Commission had a problem identifying an appropriate
hardship for the requested variance and felt more details needed to be
submitted for the pool and pool house. He explained that this case was
continued to the August Planning Commission meeting to allow time for Mr.
Landreville to submit more information addressing the Planning
Commission's concerns.
Mr. Ken Nordby, Architect, representing Mr. Alden Landreville, of 1010
Sibley Memorial Highway, was present to review the revised plans which
includes information regarding the proposed garage, accessory building and
pool.
In response to a question from Commissioner Friel, Planner Uban explained
that the Commission needs to review this application for proper placement
of the garage within the Critical Area. He explained that the applicant has
2
m
some difficulty with adding to the existing garage due to the facl
established landscaping, trees and driveway would need to be re
Uban stated that Mr. Landreville has a large lot and that his inten
preserve the trees.
Uban explained that the Commission needs to confirm what the
structure will be used for. He explained that Mr. Landreville has
that he intends to store an antique car, sports car, boat and sno
Uban explained that Mr. Landreville has submitted information re�
proposed pool and pool house. He explained that Mr. Landreville
located the pool and pool house in such a place to minimize the K
impact and change to landscaping. .
that
ocated.
tions are to
ssory
rding the
erty
Uban pointed out that the combined square footage of the access�ory
structures may be in excess of the combined square footage allo ed under
the conditional use process. He stated that a second variance m y be
necessary. Mr. Nordby stated that the proposed square footage f the pool
house to be 425 square feet and the proposed garage to be 728 quare
feet. Planner Uban stated that the pool house square footage f Ils within
the guidelines of accessory structures and that a variance will be eeded for
the second garage. Commissioner Friel stated that if the access ry
structure is not considered a garage, then the square footage still exceeds
the square footage requirement for accessory structures. Planner Uban
concurred.
Commissioner Friel stated that the City's Zoning Ordinance specifi
defines an undue hardship as such that the property cannot be pu
reasonable use without a variance. Friel stated that the property i
being put to reasonable use now. Mr. Nordby stated that they co
adding onto the existing garage towards the river. He stated that
encountered an increased slope on the north side and that trees vr
to be removed. He explained that Mr. Landreville has planted ove
trees on his property and that he does not want to remove them.
Nordby stated that the building will be used for storage and not u;
daily basis like a garage.
Commissioner Duggan stated that he has no problem with the a�
He stated that the site is large and that nothing will be visible to
neighbors.
Commissioner Duggan stated that he would be inclined to recor
approval of the Conditional Use Permit and the Modified Critical
3
to any
currently
uld need
100
llr.
dona
nd
�
Review.
Commissioner Lorberbaum stated that she believes this is a unique situation
and that the additions will not alter the character of the neighborhood. She
inquired about Section 4.5(4) of the Zoning Ordinance which requires that
of detached garages or other accessory buildings not being located nearer
the front lot line than the principal building on that lot. Planner Uban. stated
that a variance from Section 4.5(4) is needed.
Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public.
There was no one present to discuss this request.
Commissioner Duggan moved to close the public hearing.
Commissioner Lorberbaum seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Koll stated she visited the site and that she does not feel the
garage will impact Mr. Landreville's five acre site. She inquired about how
the pool construction will affect the drainage. She inquired about the
existing pond and she informed the Commission that the backyard was wet
and squishy. Mr. Nordby explained that the pond was created when the fill
was removed during construction of the house. He explained that the pool
will be raised and thaf the drainage will move into spillways on the south
end of the site.
The Commission inquired about Mr. Werthauser's drainage concerns. Public
Works Director Danielson stated that Mr. Werthauser's concerns are related
to spring time when the ground is still frozen. Danielson stated that Mr.
Werthauser was aware of the drainage when he constructed the house. He
stated that the water goes around the south side of the house. Mr. Nordby
stated that with the pool construction, they are not creating or changing the
drainage situation. He stated that runoff will only be increased by the new
hard surface created by the concrete and pool house.
Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that the City Council approve a
Critical Area Modified Site Plan and a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory
Structure to allow the construction of the pool house.
Commissioner Lorberbaum seconded the motion.
�
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend #hat the City Counc
Variances to Sectian 7.2(10) and Section 4.5(4j to atlow a secoi
proposed to be 728 sguare feet, that would be tocated neared tF
line than the principle structure, as proposed on plans dated 8-1 �
Commissioner Lorberbaum seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
NAYS: '1, FRIE!
Commissioner Friel stated that he is not satisfied there is a basis
hardship.
CONTINUED HEARING:
CASE NO. 95-14:
CRUZ - ,
VARIANCES
ii grant
d garage,
� front lot
Chair Dwyer introduced this applicatian by stating that Mr. and M s. Richard
Cruzj of 1338 Cherry Hill Road, we�e present at the July Planning
Commission meeting to discuss their request for a side yard setba k
variance that would allow them to continue to store their recrea#i nal
vehicie in their side yard. .
Chair Dwyer explained that at the meeting, the Commission felt th'at if the
Cruz's were given time to discuss altecnatives with their neighbor that a
possible compromise could be arrived at. Dwyer stated that the ruz's
agreed to meet with their neighbors and that they woutd return ba�ck to the
Planning Commission meeting in August. I
Mr. Cruz explained to the Commission that he had spoken with th ee of his
neighbors and that they have agreed to a[low him to insta[i a fenc around
the car port. He submitted copies of a revised plan to the Commi sion. He
stated that he would like to construct a cedar fence in [ieu of shru s and
that he would still install some trees.
Richard Gabriel, Attorney representing Mr. and Mrs. Cruz, was pr
discuss the Cruz's request. Mr. Gabriel expiained that the Cruz's
using this car port for two years. He explained that the configur�
house as it sits on the tot makes access to the backyard difficult
�
�ent to
ave been
on of the
�d nearly
impossible. He stated that the house is positioned at an angle to line up
with the other homes. He stated that the Cruz's lot is being treated as a
through lot which has two front yards. He further explained that the side
yard configuration does not allow the ten foot (10') setback in the side yard.
Commissioner Friel stated that the vehicle can be stored in the rear yard.
He stated that access to the rear yard is difficult, but not impossible. He
stated that the applicant built the house, that they created the difficulty with
the alignment of the home and the hardship is not due to unique
circumstances of the property.
Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public.
Mr. Steenberg, 807 Park Place Drive, stated that the Cruz's motor home is
in his picture window view. He explained that the motor home was only out
of the Cruz's yard once this summer. He stated that the motor home was
not out of their yards enough to justify storing the vehicle on their property.
Chair Dwyer inquired if Mr. Steenberg would agree to allowing Mr. Cruz to
construct a fence to sc�een their view. Mr. Steenberg stated a fence is not
adequate. He stated that the vehicle does not belong in the neighborhood
and that the driveway is not meant for storage.
Mr. Cruz explained that he has done a lot of yard work this summer and
that his work schedule prevented him from using the motor home this year.
He further stated that he inquired about covenants when he constructed his
house. Commissioner Duggan stated that the improper placement of the
concrete was not the City's fault. He inquired if Mr. Cruz has discussed
with his neighbors about installing plantings on their property line. Mr. Cruz
responded that a cedar weave, ten foot (10') high fence could be installed
along the edge of the concrete. Commissioner Duggan inquired if Mr. Cruz
considered purchasing ten feet (10') of his neighbor's property. Mr. Cruz
responded no.
Commissioner Duggan moved to close the public hearing.
Commissioner Friel seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Friel moved to recommend that the City Council, based on a
finding of fact that there is a lack of hardship, deny the requested variances
for driveway setback and outdoor storage.
Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion.
�
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
GASE NCl. 95-19:
LANE -
WETLANDS PERMIT
Mr. Jerome �ane, of 2314 ZeMay �ake Road, was present to
request for a Wetlands Permit to install a fence within one hu
{1p0'} of LeMay Lake and to install a dock.
}s his
feet
Mr. �ane informed the Planning Commission that he had spoken �o the DNR
and that they infarmed him that as long as the dock is not a per�anent
structure the DNR does not issue a permit. He submitted a letter infarming
the Commission of the DNR's position.
Mr. Lane explained that the proposed dock is for baating pleasur� only and
that he uses a smalt rowboat.
Commissioner Duggan stated that he visited the site and that his pnty
concern is his preference for black viny! clad fence. Mr. Lane sta�ed that a
btack vinyi ctad fence is forty percent i40°/a) more expensive.
Commissioner Lorberbaum stated that she visified the site. She s
the Mr. L.ane's received signatures of consent from his neighbors
the fence construction. She inquired if his neighbor's had an opii
regarding the proposed dock. Mr, Lane sfiated that his neighbors
of the proposed dock. Chair Dwyer stated thafi the consent farm
to the fence.
Mr. Rex Crandle, neighbor, stated that a dock would be nice.
that
aware
r refers
The Cammission discussed aliowing the dock and whether this w uld set a
precedent for other homeowners to install a dock around LeMay L ke. Mr.
Lane responded no and ihat only one other person mows to the e i ge of the
lake.
Commissioner Frie! inquired if there are any other fences in the ar a. Mr.
Lane responded that one other fence was remaved at the time of he utility
project in Furlong and the cemetery's fence is in the middle of the lake.
In response ta a question from Commissioner KoN, Ptanner Uban
private awnership of the iake is that of the lake bed and not the
7
;d that
r. He
stated that homeowners own the bottom of the lake which is covered by
water which is public. He stated that this is still a Wetlands issue.
Commissioner Koll stated that she continues to have a problem with fences.
She stated that she appreciates the open community atmosphere. She
stated that Mr. Lane's neighbor has chain link fence and that a dock would
create an additional nuisance to children.
Commissioner Duggan inquired about guidelines for dock installation in
Mendota Heights. Planner Uban responded that there is no policy on docks.
He explained that some newer subdivisions control docks with scenic
easements. Commissioner Friel stated that the City's Wetlands Ordinance
regulates dock by enforcing conditions that maintain natural areas.
The Commission discussed high water mark levels.
Chair Dwyer moved to recommend that the City Council approve the
Wetlands Permit allowing construction of a four foot (4') high chain link
fence up to the water's edge of LeMay Lake. Chair Dwyer informed the
Commission that this recommendation does not include approval of the
dock.
Commissioner Lorberbaum seconded the motion.
AYES: 3
NAYS: 2, KOLL, FRIEL
Commissioners Friel and Koll informed the Commission that the request is
inconsistent with the standards of the Wettands Ordinance.
Mr. Lane informed the Commission that he is a tax payer and that he should
have rights to his own land. Commissioner Friel explained the benefits of
the Wetlands Ordinance.
CASE NO. 95-22:
SLATER -
WETLANDS PERMIT
Ms. Billie Slater, of 2464 Pond Circle East, was present to discuss her
request for a Wetlands Permit to continue and finish a landscape project
that had already begun.
Chair Dwyer stated that Ms. Slater cleared vegetation which consisted of
buckthorn. He explained that seventy-two feet of vegetation was cleared
�
and replaced with wood chips, a play structure and steps. Chai Dwyer
noted his concern for approving a project after the fact could es ablish a
poor precedent. Chair Dwyer informed Ms. Slater that someone in her
neighborhood complained about her project to the City.
Commissioner Duggan stated that he visited the site and that he
recommend approval.
Commissioner Lorberbaum stated she visited the site. She inquii
the request is not approved, would the area have to be restored.
Uban stated that much has been completed. He stated that the
needs to consider whether leaving the vegetation as completed r
benefit the area as opposed to removing it and allowing weeds t�
Planner Uban suggested a condition that the new plantings be m
uld
;d that if
Planner
;ommission
�w will
grow.
intained.
Commissioner Friel stated that the structures should be removed and that
the landscaping should be allowed to remain. He stated that the shrubs
should be a species associated with the wetlands.
Ms. Slater informed the Commission that she is embarrassed tha this has
happened. She informed the Commission that she has done rese rch in
how to properly maintain the wetlands area and that she would n ver do
anything to harm the area. She further stated that precedent has been
established on Abbey Way in that many yards have been cleared own to
the pond.
Commissioner Koll stated she visited the site and that it is a defin ti
improvement to the yard. She noted her concern for establishing a
precedent.
Commissioner Duggan stated that efforts have been made to su
establish the vegetation and moved to recommend that the City
approve the requested Wetlands Permit.
MOTION FAILS due to lack of second.
Commissioner Friel moved to recommend that the City Council nc
Wetlands Permit, as proposed. Commissioner Friel suggested tha
Slater relocate the play structure outside the one hundred foot (1i
setback and that the new landscaping, sod and steps could remai
constructed.
Commissioner Lorberbaum seconded the motion.
�7
I re-
grant a
Ms.
0' )
as
AYES: 4
NAYS: 1, DUGGAN
Commissioner Duggan suggested that before the City Council reviews this
application, that Ms. Slater explore alternative sites for the play structure.
CASE NO. 95-24:
NELSON -
VARIANCE
Mr. Daniel Nelson, of 575 Sibley Court, was present to discuss his request
for a fence height variance which would allow his five foot (5') fiigh patio
fence to remain along Warrior Drive.
Mr. Nelson explained that the fence was constructed to provide privacy. He
stated that there are a lot of activities at Sibley High School and that people
have asked to use his bathrooms. He stated that the fencing adds a
decorative feature to his house. He stated that may be when his trees grow
taller, then the fence could come down. Commissioner Duggan stated the
fence appeared to be patio decoration more than it appeared to be a fence.
Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that City Council approve the
requested fence height variance.
Commissioner Lorberbaum seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Chair Dwyer called a recess at 9:06 o'clock P.M.
Chair Dwyer reconvened the meeting at 9:16 o'clock P.M.
HEARING:
CASE NO. 950-20:
MENDOTA HOMES, INC.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING
AND SUBDIVISION
Chair Dwyer introduced this application by explaining that this subject
property, known as Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, Carmen Court, has previously been
approved as a single family subdivision developed by Mr. Carmen Tuminelly.
He explained that Mr. Tuminelly has not been successful in developing
single family lots.
10
Dwyer explained that Mr. John Mathern is now proposing to re-p at the
Carmen Tuminelly property into a subdivision that would include en (10)
townhouses developed as five (5') twin homes.
Mr. John_ Mathern, owner of Mendota Homes, explained that he
constructed several townhouse units in the area such as Victoria
Townhomes, Lilywood Townhomes and Mendota Meadows.
Mathern explained the four corners of Highway 110 and 35E. H explained
that the property is well suited for townhouses in that the conditi ns for
single family homes does not exist. He stated that the land slopes to the
freeway and that a townhouse use would provide a buffer for th single
family neighborhood known as Crown Point Addition.
Mathern explained that there are a lot of trees on the property an that he
has tried to save as many as possible. He submitted an updated andscape
plan to the Commission indicating the terrain with berming and e ergreens
along Highway 110. I
Mathern stated that he held two neighborhood meetings. He stat�ed the
neighborhood voiced opposition against a number of issues. He tated the
neighborhood is concerned with the entrance into Crown Point a d putting
the residents of this area into jeopardy. He explained that MnDO has
removed the entrance ramp to northbound I-35E and now traffic �raveling
west must take a right at the light. He explained that the remaini�g
triangular piece of land is owned by MnDOT. _
Mr. Mathern submitted a letter from MnDOT dated June 9, 1995 � nforming
Mr. Tuminelly that Highway 110 will be upgrade in 1996 and tha they will
install a turn lane into Crown Point. Mathern stated that he want to see a
safe ingress and egress into this area.
Mathern stated that the neighborhood discussed how traffic safE
addressed. Mathern explained that widening the road may help.
indicated that a trail extension is possible.
Mathern explained that the neighborhood also discussed whether
townhomes are a good use for this property.
Mr. Mathern reviewed plans indicating exterior elevations and foo�
2,200 to 2,600 square feet. He stated that the townhouses will r
double garages with one or two story homes a possibility. He sta�
basements will be an option. Mr. Mathern stated that he is workii
11
will be
e further
prints of
ave
:ed that
ig on
exterior designs to be compatible with the neighborhood. He used the
Lilywood townhouses as an example.
Mr. Mathern stated the proposed townhouses will have open space around
units with large rear yards and that there will be a common open space. He
stated that an association will maintain the landscaping, irrigation,
driveways and yards. .
Mathern explained that the driveways will be constructed in a snake design
to save trees and that the units are being placed to accommodate the site.
Mathern stated that he has received calls from interested buyers who live in
Mendota Heights. He explained that there is a market for this type of
development in Mendota Heights, primarily a mature, affluent buyer.
Chair Dwyer stated that more information is needed from Mr Mathern and
that general information is being discussed tonight.
In response to a question from Chair Dwyer, Mr. Mathern explained, due to
safety reasons, MnDOT will, in 1996, overlay Highway 110 and install a
right turn lane for Crown Point Drive.
In response to a question from Chair Dwyer, Mr. Mathern stated that with
the townhouse construction, there will be an additional 60 to 65 trips per
day. He stated there should not be a significant difference in trips
generated from this development. ` .
Mr. Mathern stated there are three individuals interested in purchasing a
home. He stated that people are looking to purchase north of Highway 110.
He explained the price range to be 5225,000 and up.
Referring to the Mendota Meadows construction off of Mendota Heights
Road and Dodd Road, Commissioner Duggan stated that the roads are left in
a mess and that he wants reassurance that Mr. Mathern will follow up on
this detail with the Mendota Meadows project and any future projects in the
City. Mr. Mathern responded that this is a City improvement and that it will
be taken care of.
Commissioner Duggan inquired if Mr. Mathern has considered any
alternative plans. Mathern responded that maintaining green space was an
�issue and that impervious surface was kept to a minimum (27%).
In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Mr. Mathern
12
explained that the neighborhood's key issues are traffic safety, tpwnhouse
opposition and change in general. �
Duggan stated there is a lot of air noise in this area. He further tated that
he does not like the spider effect of the driveways. He stated h would like
to see the units reduced to 7. He stated he would like to see m re effort
placed in noise attenuation.
Duggan stated that cleaning up the site will help the neighborhodId and that
there are some scrubby trees. He stated that the best trees are �iear the
existing home. `
Duggan stated that many technical items are missing such as ar
elevations, lighting plan, floor plans, utility and landscape plans.
Commissioner Duggan stated that he is against this specific tow
schematic and that he is uncomfortable with changing the zonin
Commissioner Lorberbaum stated that exceptional conditions mu:
identified to justify a rezoning. She stated that she needs to see
conditions and that she is satisfied with the current zoning. Chai
stated that exceptional conditions are needed for Comprehensive
Amendment. Mr. Mathern stated that the proximity to the freew;
intersections, terrain and no privacy for single family homes are e
conditions. He further stated that Mendota Meadows is selling w
they are �located in a noisy area. '
Commissioner Lorberbaum inquired if Mr. Tuminelly gave the lots
price. Mr. Mathern stated that he has no idea and that Mr. Tumii
approached him. Mathern stated there is a market for townhousi
stated that the Victoria Townhouses are very similar to what he i
and that they are located near a very noisy area. He stated thes
have proven to have a good resale market.
Commissioner Duggan inquired why townhouses are superior to
family in relation to noise. Mr Mathern stated structurally there
differences. .
Commissioner Friel stated that the application is incomplete for th
Comprehensive Plan Amendment. He inquired if a Planned Unit
Development is needed or are variances necessary. Friel stated tl
changes in conditions since the comprehensive plan was adopted
proven.
13
iitectural
�ouse
t be
:xceptional
Dwyer
'lan
y and
cceptional
:II and that
� fair
elly
��. He
proposing
homes
gle
no
dtobe
Commissioner Koll stated that changes have occurred in that 35E has
opened and that the amount of traffic has increased significantly. She
stated that single family homes may not work in this area and that
townhouses may provide a barrier to the existing single family homes.
Commissioner Duggan read an excerpt from the March 22, 1995 Planning
Commission minutes recommending that City Council restrict further
subdivisions on this property.
Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public.
Ms. 0'Gara, Crown Point Drive, presented a petition to the Commission
which has signatures indicating opposition to the proposed development.
O'Gara stated that Mr. Tuminelly did not relocate trees properly and that
they are now dying. She further stated that Mr. Tuminelly was asking for
565,000 to $100,000 per lot. She stated that these prices were too high
and that she believes these lots could sell for 530,000 to 550,000. She
stated that these lots are similar to those in Crown Point. She further stated
that the neighborhood is happy with the frontage road and that she believes
that widening the frontage road is only necessary due to the development of
the townhouses.
Chair Dwyer inquired with Ms. O'Gara as to what is wrong with a ten (10)
unit proposed townhouse development. O'Gara responded that she moved
into this area knowing that the zoning was for single family homes and that
she wants this property to remain this way. She stated that 5150,OOO�to
5200,000 homes would blend well with the Crown Point neighborhood.
She stated that rezoning property is scary as the City could end up with a
different development than originally approved. Ms. O'Gara stated that slie
moved into a single family area and that she would like to see this area stay
single family.
Nancy Girard, 873 Highway 110, stated that the road widening would be in
front of her house. She stated that she does not like the design of the
townhouses and that they do not seem right for Mendota Heights. She
stated that the City needs to be more creative in allowing different building
design styles. She stated she has done some landscaping and that it will be
affected should the road be widened. She further noted her concern for
safety, especially relating to her three children. Ms. Girard stated that
housing designs in Mendota Heights are beginning to look alike and that
more diversity in housing should be considered. She referred to the Centex
townhouse area and stated that she though the City should have been more
creative in allowing more creative housing styles.
14
Daniet Matecha, 912 Crown Point Drive, stated he is opposed to he
rezaning request. He stated that Mr. Mathern has not presented exceptional
circumstances as required by the City. He noted his concern for R-2 zaning
in that it coutd allow low income housing by the HRA. He furthe noted
concern that the proposed density is too high.
Richard l.eitner, 897 Highway 110, stated that he will be most di
impacted with the proposed development. He stated that he wa
impression that Mr. Turninelly's original subdivision appraval was
conditianed upan nat aiiowing further subdivision to this prope
stated that Mr. Tuminelly opened the property by removing trees
he maved dozens of trees which are now dead. He stated that h
Mr. Tuminelly and Mr, Mathern have been partners from the start'
their intentions have always been to construct townhouses on #hi
further stated that the Lilydale townhouses were constructed in r�
have given an apartment like appearance.
In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Mr. Leitne�
that when the trees were removed, the noise level daubled.
Tim O'Gara, 919 Crown Court, stated that his house is as close
freeway as the proposed townhouse development. He stated tF
lane on Highway 110 has been asked for by the neighbors for y
stated that Mr. Tuminelly is asking too much far the lots. He st
not want the property rezoned.
���
He
�nd that
. believes
and that
a site. He
�ws and
� stated
� the
the turn
rs. Ne
�d he does
Paul Johnson, '! 968 Crown Point, stafied that existing subdivision ts
complete and that the road can barely hold the traffic now. He s ated that
the propased ten (10} unit townhouses would generate more cars than four
(4) single family hauses.
Commissioner Duggan moved to table the request for Comprehen:
Amendment, Rezoning and Subdivision until September 26, 1995
the contractar time to provide required infarmation as regulated b�
Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Subdivision Ctrdinances. Duggar
that this item should not be rescheduled should Mr. Mathern not k
provide the required information.
Commissioner Friel seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: U
Chair Dwyer catted at recess at 10:36 o'ctock P.M.
15
ive Plan
:o allow
the
stated
e able to
Chair Dwyer reconvened the meeting at 10:48 o'clock P.M.
HEARING:
CASE NO. 95-21:
AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES -
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND
VARIANCES
Chair Dwyer introduced this application by stating AT&T Wireless Services
has constructed a cellular telephone tower one hundred twenty-five feet
(125') tall on a piece of surplus MnDOT right-of-way at the intersection of
State Highway 55 and Interstate 494.
Chair Dwyer stated that the tower was built on MnDOT property with the
assumption by AT&T that construction on MnDOT property did not need
City approval. He stated that he his satisfied that AT&T's intentions to
construct the tower were not in bad faith.
Mr. Peter Beck, Attorney representing AT&T Wireless Services, introduced
Max Thompson and Ted Olson, both employed by AT&T Wireless Services.
Mr. Beck explained that the facility is 99 percent complete and to make the
system operational, the computers need to be installed. Mr. Beck reviewed
graphics and provided photos of the site. Beck explained that the tower is a
one hundred twenty-five feet (125') monopole with antennae and a shelter
building. He stated that this facility is similar to sixty (60) other cell sites in
the Twin Cities area including a site approved by the City of Mendota
Heights in 1993 (I-35E and Highway 13 - Strub site). �
Mr. Beck stated that this request is similar to that approved by Council in
1993 which included a height variance. He stated that the Council
determined that only a Conditional Use Permit was necessary because it
was an essential service structure.
Mr. Beck explained that a setback variance is not needed as the pole is
setback thirty-five feet (35') from an abandoned railway.
Mr. Beck stated that the location is ideal in that it is near highways and is
zoned industrial. He stated the pole is out of view from residents. He
submitted pictures giving different view perspectives. Beck stated the pole
matches existing light poles and that the pole is placed in a cluster of
existing light poles. He stated there is a similar pole located at the corner of
Highway 169 and Crosstown. He stated that positive reactions have been
16
received.
Beck expiained that each cell site has height determined by the
area and surrounding terrain. He stated that one hundred twer
(125') pole is necessary for service in this location. He stated
height is necessary and #hat anything less would prove a hards
would be toa restrictive.
vering
five foot
t this
in that it
Beck stated fihat AT&T agrees the landscape plan could be enha ced
significantty but no amoc�nt of landscaping will cestrict the view f the pole.
He stated there is definitely room to compromise.
Regarding Planner Uban's suggested conditions, Mr. Beck stated that the
access road wil[ only be used once a month and that their intenti ns are to
use Class 5 dirt. He s#ated if the Commission wants blacktop, then AT&T
will comply. He stated that a turnaround hardEy seems necessar�, but
ATBcT will comply if required by the Commissian. Regarding buil�ding
material, he stated that the tower on the Strub site is tocated wit�iin a
Planned Unit Development where specific building materials were enforced.
He stated this pole is located at a highway intersection which is �aned
industrial. He stated the industrial zoning district allows an aggre ate stone
buiid'+ng and that the existing building meets the zoning requireme�nts. He
stafied the landscaping can be enhanced.
Beck s#ated the tower height needs to be one hundred twenty-fiv feet
(125') and that painting the pole will be expensive but can be do e. IVar.
Beck s#ated that AT&T has no objections to enhance the landsca ing but
that they cannot agree to landscaping the entire property. He sta ed they
will work with City staff. Beck stated ATBcT desigrtates one main enance
person who takes care of the cell site. �
Mr. Beck stated constructian inspections are the same as the 199
inspections and that reports are available. He stated the bui�din� s omplie
with building codes. He infarmed the Commission that the buildin came
from a site located at the Coltege of St. Catherine's.
Mr. Beck explained that the positive impac#s of the cell site are th�t i#
provides improved cellular #ransmissions far 2,000 customers and hat it will
handle 10,OC10 calls per day during peak hours . He stated that th re will be
better reception� especially with hand held phones.
Regarding the location of the cell site, Mr. Beck stated the FAA I
approved the iocation. Mr. Beck stated that nighttime iighting is
17
red of
towers over two hundred feet and that the FAA did not require AT&T to
install nighttime lighting.
Commissioner Duggan stated that he is not sure he agrees that the need for
service is a justified hardship. Mr. Beck stated that if Mr. Duggan does not •-�
consider cellular telephone as an essential service, then he understands his
opinion. Mr. Beck explained that many industries rely on cellular telephones
to run their day-to-day business and that cellular phones are considered an �
essential service to industries. Commissioner Duggan stated the
surrounding terrain is flat and asked why a seventy-five foot (75') tower will
not work. He inquired about the service area. Mr. Beck explained the line
of site and that cellular transmissions cannot see over hills. Mr. Beck stated
that information regarding service areas can be generated using computer
graphics. Commissioner Duggan stated the City Council should be given
this information.
Commissioner Duggan stated that this area is considered the gateway to
Mendota Heights. He stated the road should be paved and that he is not
convinced that one hundred twenty-five feet (125') is not necessary. He
further stated that the fencing should be black vinyl clad. Mr. Beck stated
that they are not recommending a fence at this time.
Commissioner Lorberbaum stated that she visited the site and also the site
on Highway 169 and Crosstown. She stated the pole on Highway 169 and
Crosstown is setback further with large trees used for landscaping. She
further stated sHe is a cellular telephone user and that'she has not .
experienced any signal problems in Mendota Heights. She stated that this
intersection is the gateway to Mendota Heights and that this area needs to
look respectable. She further stated the building exterior materials should
be changed and she inquired if fencing is required by the City. Planner
Uban stated there are not special City requirements for fencing. In response
to a question from the Commission, Mr. Olson stated that the runs on the
pole were installed for construction purposes. Mr. Thompson stated a
twenty foot (20') run will remain and that fencing will be installed. He
stated that there have been no instances of climbers at other cell sites.
Commissioner Lorberbaum stated that she would rather see the antennae
located on the water tower as originally proposed. Mr. Thompson stated
that the water tower location was considered and that AT&T did try and
negotiate with the City Council to install an antenna on top of the water
tower in early 1995. He stated it was determined that the water tower site
was too restrictive and that the I-494 intersection would best serve the
customers. Mr. Thompson stated that the height of the water tower does
rF:3
not help their situation and that a highway intersection was the �est
scenario. �
Commissioner Friel inquired if this application meets the requiren
Zoning Ordinance. He stated that cell towers are proliferating al
country and he inquired if the City can expect more tower reque
future. Mr. Beck stated that as a number of users increase, the
cells increase, therefore more towers are needed. He stated tha
of the towers decreases as they grow closer together. Commis:
stated that he thought the higher the tower, the more range the�
inquired if satellite systems will be considered as a future use foi
telephones. He stated that the setback requirement should be b
size of the parcel.
In response to a question from Commissioner Friel, Planner Ubar
within Section 23 of the Zoning Ordinance, exceptions to height
requirements does not list transmission towers. Commissioner F
that the height of the tower is a big concern. He stated that a h
not been demonstrated.
Commissioner Koll stated that the antennae and building are an
the intersection. She stated she would like to see the entrance
Heights improved. She noted her concern for landscaping and
Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public.
There was no one present to discuss this request.
Commissioner Duggan moved to close the public hearing.
Commissioner Friel seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Friel moved to recommend that City Council deny �
requested variance and Conditional Use Permit as a result of findi
hardships for the variances.
Chair Dwyer seconded the motion.
AYES: 3
NAYS: 2, DUGGAN, KOLL
Commissioner Friel moved to recommend that City Council con
ordinance that would specifically address future cellular tower i
19
�nts of the
over the
ts in the
�umber of
the height
�ner Friel
have. He
cellular .
sed on the
stated that
el stated
rdship has
3 sore to
Mendota
g no
er an
uest
within the City.
Chair Dwyer seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
HEARING:
CASE NO. 95-23:
SIMMONDS -
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR FILL
Ms. Janice Simmonds, owner of Outlot A, Evergreen Knoll (1650 Wachtler
Avenue) was present to discuss her request for a Conditional Use Permit for
Fill which would allow the construction of a single family home on Outlot A,
Evergreen Knoll.
Ms. Simmonds estimated approximately 900 cubic yards of fill will be
needed to raise the home so it may have gravity flow to sanitary sewer
utilities on Wachtler Avenue.
Commissioner Duggan stated that the neighbor to the north would like to be
assured that the trees along the perimeter of his property are protected.
In response to a question from Commissioner Lorberbaum, Public Works
Director Danielson stated that with the development of Outlot A, the
extension of Wachtler Avenue will be discouraged. .
Commissioner Koll stated a neighbor's concern about water problems and
erosion and saving the trees to the north.
Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public.
Don Peterson, 790 Evergreen Knoll, stated he is not opposed to the
development. He stated he is concerned for drainage. He stated that if
proper care is not taken, the water drains directly onto his property and that
he wants reassurance that the water will flow along the designated
easements.
John Hartmann, 812 Deer Trail Point, inquired if there was a permit issued
for the fill brought in over the years. He stated that over the years, the
natural water way has been filled in. He inquired if a DNR study has been
completed. He further stated that all lots have to front on a public street.
Public Works Director Danielson stated that grading plans were approved
20 ✓
e
wi#h the subdivision and that this outlot has been filled little by li
the years. Ne stated that this permit is the first request. He sta
Outtot is not a designated wetlands and that there is no need fo�
study. Chair Dwyer inquired if this construction would interfere
course af water. Danielson responded that there are no easeme�
gaining easements should be condition of approval. He stated tt
along the sides and ten feefi along the north should be adequate.
Simmonds agreed.
tie over
�d this
a DNR
vith the
ts and that
�t five feet
Ms.
Public Works Director Danielson stated that Wachtler is a public �treet and
' th� proposed house does front Wachtler. Mr. Hartmann inquired�about
emergency vehicte access. Chair Qwyer stated that Ms. Simmonds
driveway serves as the access for emergency vehicles. �
Emil Slawinski, noted his concern for drainage and that the orig
course needs to be preserved. He stated he wants assurance ti
grading to his property line will not create erosion. Danielson s�
Ms. Simmonds`s plan indicates that a silt fence witl used as an
control method.
water
the
d that
5ion
' Lee Opp, 7$9 Evergreen Knoll� stated there will be many trucks h�uling fi!!
and that she does not want the traffic on Evergreen Knotl. She inquired if
' the trucks could be direc#ed down Wachtler Avenue. �
;
' In response to a guestion from Commissianer Frie! regarding the !�
driveway, Pubtic Works Director Danielson sta#ed that this is an ui
' situation and that Ms. Simmonds has agreed to install a turnaroun
i .
' Commissioner Duggan moved to close the public hearing.
; .
; Ghair Dwyer seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Friel moved to recommend that fihe City Council g
Conditionai Use Permit for Fill with the faliowing conditions:
;
,1.
�
�2.
�
That turf establishment specifications be added to the finai
That an additionai silt fence be inctuded atong the eastern
line across the swale to golf caurse.
21
usual
a
perty
3. That the driveway turnaround be reviewed by the Fire Marshal and
include a five foot (5') setback to the property line.
4. That all dump truck spillage be cleared promptly at the cost of the
developer.
5. That ten foot (10') utility easements around the property perimeters
be provided to the City.
6. That all dump truck access to the site be from Wachtler Avenue and
not Evergreen Knolls.
Commissioner Koll seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
HEARING:
CAO NO. 95-03:
SCHAEFER -
MODIFIED CRITICAL AREA SITE PLAN REVIEW
Mr. Keith Heaver, contractor, and Mr. Joe Schaefer, of 1889 Hunter Lane,
were present to discuss their request for a Modified Site Plan review to
allow construction of a porch addition, walkway, garage expansion, pool
and retaining wall. ' .
Mr. Heaver explained that the enclosed walkway will connect the porch to
the proposed garage addition. He stated that the construction of the
retaining wall will create a flat area for the pool. He stated no trees will be
removed.
Chair Dwyer stated the City received a letter of concern from an adjacent
neighbor.
Commissioner Duggan stated he visited the site and he commented on the
slope line dropping seven feet (7'). He also commented about the largeness
of the proposed retaining wall. He stated he would like to see a vinyl
coated, chain link fence.
Commissioner Lorberbaum stated that letters of concern are more effective
with signed names, and that she discounts anonymous letters.
22
Commissioner Kol( expressed cancern for tree protection.
Commissioner Duggan noted concern for erosion created by swi
water discharge. �
Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public.
There was no one present to discuss this request.
Chair Dwyer moved to ciose the pubiic hearing.
Commissioner Duggan secanded the motian.
AYES: 5
NAYS: {i
Commissioner Friei moved to recommend that the City Council a
Madified Site Plan, as proposed to allaw constructian of a porch
walkway, garage expansion, pooi and retaining wali.
Commissioner Koll seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
DtSGUSS PROPOSED ATHLETtC STADIUM ORDINANCE
The Planning Commission tabled discussion on the proposed Ath
Stadium Qrdinance until September 2fi, 1995.
DISGUSS SCHEDUI.ING A WORKSHQP W[TN CITY C{�UNCIL
TO DISCUSS HIGHWAY 55 CORRIDOR
iming pool
The Planning Commission was of the consensus to recommend Th
September 28, 1995 as the date for a workshap with City Councif
discuss the Highway 55 Corridor issue.
VERBAL REVIEW
Public Works Director Danielson updated the Planning Cammission
Council actions regarding recent planning cases.
23
�
the
c��r
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the Planning Commission moved to adjourn
its meeting at 12:45 o'clock A.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
24
�
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 31, 1995
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator n
�J i
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer �r
SUBJECT: Joint Park Maintenance Agreement with Independent .Schi
District No. 197
DISCUSSION
Included in tonight's List of Claims is the annual billing from ISD No. 1�7 for the
Sibley Park.
The billing is within the budgeted amount of 515,450 and is some S 1,9j51 more
than the 1995 billing. �
ACTION REQUIRED
None. This is for Council information only.
LES:kkb
ti i
ANNUAL REPORT
AUGUST 1995
COMMUNITY EDUCATION
ISD 197
. - ;�
�v \
•� � 1, `'��
� 4 ���►��1.
�.t�.l� �
q
�'�'d sC�O .. , 4l� ti�
OL DIST
PARTNERS IN LIFELONG LEARNING
The mission of ISD 197 Community Education Depart ent
is to encourage, assist and empower
all people in the pursuit of lifelong learning.
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 197 COMMUNITY EDUCA
1994-95 ANNUAL REPORT
YEAR IN REVIEW . . . . . . .
August 1994
• New Youth Service Coordinator hired.
September 1994
• Community Education OfFces move from Henry Sibley High School to Metro II facility in
Industrial Park.
• First Annual Sibley Community Pride Day held in conjunc[ion with Homecoming.
October 1994 .
• Open houses held at 1300 Mendota Heights Road and 1037 Bidwell to introduce public to new �
facilides—Learning Center South and Learning Center North.
• Casual For A Cause begins its second year with Community Education, Metro II and Disa-ict Oi
November 1994
• School Board approves Early Learning /Later Learning Policy.
• CEAC plans and hosts lOth Annual Dakora Area Community Educadon Advisory Council
December 1994
• Community Educadon Coordinators and suppor[ staff "adopc-a-family" [hrough Neighbors, Inc.
January 199�
• Governor's legislative budget proposes massive cuts in community education funding. ISD 197
Education faces a potential cut of �162,000. Budget/Legislative task force formed with staff and
• A new coordinator of the Access Project _and the Adult Enrichment program is hired.
February 1995
• Building custodians are hired in place of building supervisors.
• CEAC (Community Education Advisory Council) unanimously approves new facility
and fee structure.
March 1995
• Bond referendum for [wo new middle schools is successful.
• First annual all community educadon staff development day held - topic was change and managi
• A new secretary is hired for youth, aquatics and adult programs.
• Northern Dakota Counry Community Pulse Project holds a two-day strategic planning retreat (F�
Communiry) on issue of juvenile violence.
• Legislaave session "heats up" while le[ters, phone calls, and "Rally Days" are held at the Capito]
support for Community Educa[ion.
April 1995
• New facilities/accouncing secretary hired and officed at Leaming Center South.
• New full-time secre[ary hired for Extended Day, Senior Programs, and pre-school at Learning
• Henry Sibley High School's Positive Force for Change gains statewide recognition by Govern
Service Recognition.
• School Board approves new facili[y management regulations and fee structure.
May 1995
• Legislative session ends with Communi[y Education funding reinstated at last year's level!
June 1995
• Children's Defense Fund Grant awarded to ISD 197 Early Childhood Family Educa[ion.
• A"challenging" year wraps up with no new changes in the immediate future!
N
Heights
renamed
staff.
ommunity
itizens.
nt regulations
ig transitions.
cus on
to demonstrate
nter North.
Youth
MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR
Community Education in Minnesota began as a grass roots effort by citizens to provide lifelong learning
opportunities. Twenty-five years ago it may have meant basket weaving or belly dancing classes were offered in the
public schools in the evenings. It has evolved to mean decision-making, leadership and a continued advocacy for
lifelong learning. For me this is most clearly demonstrated by the Community Education Advisory Council (CEAC).
Members of CEAC represent your
neighbors, business people, service club
members, youth and senior citizens.
CEAC members have been di-
rectly involved in several projects that will
have a lasting impact on our community
and schools. This year members have been
involved in the following: serving on the
steering committee of the Pulse Project,
which is undertaking solutions to juvenile
violence; promoting a safer and more se-
cure environment for the public use of
schools in the evenings; working toward
the adoption of the Eazly Learning/Later
LeamingPolicy; monitoring and lobbying
legislators to reinstate funding; and devel-
oping leadership skills by participating in
and planning workshops and conferences.
L[o R Community Education Advisory Council—co-chairs, Liz Williams &
Mitzi Moh; Secretary, Rhonda Thompson
Recently I heard a talk that
focused on never underestimating "the
power of ONE." The point being, that many things would never be accomplished unless one person decided that
changes needed to be made. The individuais that volunteer their time and talents to the philosophy of community
education through CEAC deserve our thanks and my sincerest appreciation. This Annual Report is as much a reflecdon
of their efforts as it is the efforts of the staff in community educadon.
%�(���G(/
�•
Bev Fri[z, Director
Community Education
A TRANSITION YEAR
Appropriately enough our department held its firs� ever al! staff inservice on March 20, 1995 and its theme was
"Mastering the Trapeze: Lessons on Transitions." This has been a year that has brought its Full share of changes,
evidenced by the following:
-� Community Educaaon Offices move to Metro II facilides in Mendota Heights.
Board approves a three year lease.
� Staff changes occur that require res[ructering and retraining.
-� Pulse Project sets two year strategic action plan to address juvenile violence.
� Community collaborations expand to include new programming eEforts with
Dodge Nature Center, Rotary, and Henry Sibley High School.
� Early Learning and Later Learning policy adopted with specific tasks defined.
-� Legislative Funding issues bnngs citizen support [o prevent cutbacks.
Each of these transitions are high(ighted in the report. While [hese changes have brought challenges to
community education, they have offered opportunities as well.
�
a,, ,+ c, ,,.
COMMUNTTY EDUCATION PUTS THE MOVES ON
On September 10, 1994 the Community Education Offices made ye� another move within a d
Learning Center South is our permanen[ "home" for at least the next three years. Our new locaaon is t
Metro II building at 1300 Mendota Heights Road. Metro II is also an educauonal facility, which provi
support to seven metro school districts. �
; month span.
first floor of the
, technology
In addition to housing the community education offices which were formerly at Sibley, the n�,v location houses
four early learning classrooms, two conference/classrooms, and one 1500 square foot large meedng r�m used for
activities ranging from toddler's toys and rrucks to tap and ballet for youth. New this fall will be an aft r work aerobics
class for adults. �
The new facilities now provides the southern residents of the district with better access to earl� learning
opportunities. With the move came more changes—a new name change For our former "community c nter" at 1037
Bidwell in West St. Paul to Learning Center North. At L�arning Center North ali ages participate in pr gramming
opportunities. It is also known as the Senior Cen[er to those residents agc 50+. An Open House was h ld last fall to
promote the new and improved community education facilities.
SCHOOL BOARD ADOPTS LIFELONG
LEAItNING POLICY
Adopted on November 7,1994 this policy promotes
the philosophy that learners are all ages. After an extensive
one year review of communi[y education based on early
leaming and later learning opportunides, several recommen-
dations were put forth from the committee. The new lifelong
learning policy helps to promote those changes and recognizes
and celebrates the 38,000 lifelong learners in District 197.
Policy 6.100 speaks to the fac[ tha[ "human nature is
inquisitive and that people naturally want to understand the
world around them." Thus this is the "central purpose of our
public school system and that to effecavely meet this need,
education must be viewed as a lifelong process, extending
beyond the scope of ages Five to eigh[een." W ith the adoption
of the policy came several tasks that would promote early
learning and later learning within the district. A community-
wide survey was conducted in May to de[ermine the feasibil-
ity of an all-day preschool childcare operated by [he District.
In addition, the desirability of a co-tocation of services and
programs for later leamers is being examined in connection
with the facilities at 1037 Bidwell in West S[. Paul. A
recommendation on both of these task forces will come before
the Board in [he Fall of 1995.
` , �
.... '� w. < �ih,. �� � .� �i
_... _ _ __ . a,--���':"�. � =-; � "
� �-. �ri,
: �b./A �.Y�' .. �
� I . . ,.. _..� �w�'2i,'�w • a, .
�
� � •�, < ' �� � r� �,": x
>:
�...
_._.. � _��� �.� r�b� `
• �.`��� '.ij
� �.
� - *�> �
�,• *�� � 3� •
�:., � ,�»
� �� � 'r;'
,,., .,�5�+�� ;,;,� ,�- ,�,,
;�M;.. � ,;;:�„,..af
. �
f
�,,,
_ . "�-�
Membcrs oF Sibley Brass Ensemble an Board member
David Juckson listen �o Dr Monson's r marks at grand
opening of Lcaming Center South
Community Education Advisory Council Members
Geg Bauman Mitzi Moh Jim Nikolai
Don Buckner Jane McKay Max S�ucedo, Chair Elec;t
Terry Davern Susan Maher Terah Venzant
Li-r. Williams, Chair
COMl�1UNITY EDUCATTON STAFF
Bev Fritz, Director
Sara Barthoiomew, Youth Activities Coordinator
Barb Eschie, Senior Center Coordinatar
Sonya Ferber, Secretary
Sharan Gagner, ECFE Coardinator
Sherry Green, Extended Day Coordinator
Mary Happach, Area Resauzce Center Coardinatar
Gayle Heuer, Secretary
Sheila Langfield, Facitities Scheduler
Michelle Liebl, Youth Development Coordinator
Lynelle Lindber„ Access Project/Adult Programs Coardinator
viary Wellington, Secretary
Jan Simon, Area Resource Center Scheduler
KeIly Swanson, Aquaacs Coordinatar
MONEY, MONEY, WHO HAS THE MQNEY?
Do you remember the childhooci �ame "Button, button, who has the button?"'and the thrill of accomptishrnent
that you had when you found it? Unfortunately, if we were to equate the "'game"' of funding education in Minnesota
with those fond memaries of childhooti games, we would stili be searching for the tast button.
This gast legisiative session was one that wi11 be not st�on be forgotten by cammuni[y educators throughout
Minnesota. When the Governor announced his proposed budge�, iG was apparent that lifelong leaming was going ta be
a"victim" of budget cuts. Some af the proposed fundiag cucs wouid have impacted yauth service, senior citizen
programming, adults with disabitities proeramming, and funding forchildren with special needs in schoql-age chiidcare,
volunteers in the schools, and public access �o use of school buildings after hours. Overall the impact would have been
$19 millian throughout the state in comrrtunity education.
District 197 residents showed
their supportof comrr►uni[y education by
writing letters, mailing gostcarfls, caili ng
legislators, and attending "rally days" at
[he Capitol. When the dust cleared in
May, the 1994 Legislature reinstated all
community education funding at its
present level. While this was certainiy a
happier scenerio than what "might have
been,'" it makes the eighth s[raight year
that there has been no increase in the
general community education levy.
Community Educatian continues to ad-
dress societal issues through providing
the needed services Ehat residents iden-
tify. As these needs grow, however,
there has been no additit�nal funding. In
the upcoming year, the Community
Education Advisory Councit wili be
evaluating our presenc programs and
services and will be developing a strategic
pian to address future issues.
ECFE children and families mect Senatnr James Metzen at ECFE ftally Day at
che Capitol.
� •
THE NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY PULSE PRO
,
4
On March 9-10, 1995 fif[y adults and students from northern Dakota County participated in a
plan to address juvenile violence. Focus on Communiry, an event planned by the Northem Dakota Coi
Pulse Project, was held at Koinonia Retreat Center in Annandale. �
Focus on Community
was designed to provide a com-
munity-wide ini[iative that de-
veloped "back home" strategies
to address juvenile violence in
the communities that are de-
imed by ISD 197 borders. Ju-
venile violence was defined as
crimes committed by juveniles
and crimes where juveniles are
the victims (i.e. child abuse).
; � ,
�
Eleven youths repre- " -
senting Sibley, St. Thomas '�'
Academy and Convent of the
Visitaaon high schools formed �
a panel to provide their answers ��Focus on Communiry" small group report
about what it feels like growing
up in a more violent society,
what their greatest fears are, and what they hope can be done about them. An open forum followed where
engaged in a dialogue with the s[udents. Small group sessions were given the task of "Blue Sky" planning
come up with solutions to rhe issues raised earlier and were told to imagine they had unlimi[ed resourc
conclusion on Friday afternoon, practical solutions had been established.
Three specific areas for action were determined based on [heir practicality, achievabili[y, and F
committees are .1) development of commun�ty standards and enforcement applied to youth and adult co�
establishments, 2) alternative youth activities and ga[hering spots for teens to combat boredom and 3) rr
build self-esteem and engage adults and older youths as role models. Each of these committees are actic
goals that can be achieved in the next two years. The Duector of Community Education, Beverly Fritz,
for the Pulse Project.
THE COST OF DnINC BUSINESS
The cost of renting facilities from the school district will be increasing next year. This spring
Education Advisory Council recommended to the school board a change in fee structure and managen
after hours facility use by the public. The Board adopted the recommendations which will provide for ;
safety within schools in the evening. Most buildinas will have a building supervisor on duty in the eve
The new fee structure also is commensurate wuh charges in districts of similar si2e. In order to �
within the schools, a permit applicadon must be filled out at least one week prior to the use of the facility
information or to request an application, please call Sheila at 688-0668. '
tegic act�on
Community
[he participants
ach group could
[o do it. By the
�rity. These
uct and
itorships to
oriented with
the facilitator
Community
regularions of
� security and
�e a space
For further
1994-95 COMMUNITY EDC.TC�TInN BUDGET SUMMARY
Revenue Expenses
$646,118 Levy and State Aid S925,985 Salaries and benefits
$343,488 Fees 562,590 Supplies
176 76 Qther • S217 39 Other(Contr'd Services,equipment)
�1,166,369 Total 51,205,970 Tota1
0
Early Learnir
$398, f 5d
You��� ���,N���
�ss,00a
1994-95 PROGRAyt REVENUE
AduEt Programs
�ann �aa
Early Learnir
$434,082
Youfh Support Youth $137,92A
$135,608
Youth $124,974
299a-9M PRpC,R�M E�PEYSES
:omm Services
$30Q,$75
Aduit Programs
..,...� _t3
:omm. Services
$248,234
0
CITY
i
� � .
� 1
OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�r {
MENIQ ��
August 31, 1995
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
i
� �
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer/�i .
SUBJECT: 1995 Bond Financing (
7
i
DISGUSSION �
At fihe present time, we have four improvemenfi Projects underwa which
wil! require financing. The Projects are as follows. x
' �
Improvement Proiect Cost ; Finance Amt.
# .
t
Friendty Hiils Streets $ 3, 604,000 ' $'1,18Cf,QQO
Ivy Falls South $ 275,000 i S 275,000 .
Swanson's � 200,40Q S 200,40{}
Mendota Meadaws 5 260,000 � $ 260,000
�
In addition, we can currently call for prepaym�ent and refunding the balance
of �250,000 Improvement Bonds from our 1985 Issue. A future saving q about
$28,100 can be realized by including the refunding with expenses of abo � t
�2,5t}0. Another issue will become currently refundable in 1996 and can be
refunded at the time we do our financing for 1996. �The sale date has be n left
open at this time, however, we anticipate a sale date of November 7th.
�
ACTIt}N REQUIRED �
Adapted Resalutian Na. 95- Resalution Pravidin,g for PubJic SaJ of
�2,170,000 Genera/ Obligation Refunding and lmproverrrent Bonds of 199�5.
-- LES:kkb
4
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
HELD: September 5, 1995
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota
County, Minnesota, was duly called and held at the City Hall in
said City on Tuesday, the 5th day of September, 1995, at
o''clock .M.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC
OF $2,170,000
_ GENER.AL OBLIGATION REFUNDING
IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1995
SALE
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Finding; Amount and Purpose. It is hereby found,
determined and declared that this City should issue $2,170,000
General Obligation Refunding and Improvement Bonds of 1995 (the
"Bonds") to provide funds to redeem on February 1, 1995, all of
the outstanding General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1985,
dated February 1, 1985 of the City, and to provide funds to
finance the construction of various improvements within the City.
2. Appointment of Financial Advisor. The City Council
does hereby appoint The Shaughnessy Company, in St. Paul,
Minnesota, to act as its financial advisor to the City for the
sale of the Bonds.
3. Meeting. This Council shall meet at the time and place
specified in the fonn of notice hereinafter contained for the
purpose of opening and considering sealed bids for, and awarding
the sale of, the Bonds. �
4. Notice of Bond Sale. The City Clerk is hereby
authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and
purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper
of the City and in Northwestern Financial Review not less than
299266.1
�
�
( �
ten (10) days in advance of date of sale, as provided
which notice shall be in substantially�the form set fo
Exhibit A attached hereto. � i
;
4
5. Official Terms of Bond Sale.F The terms and c
of said Bonds and the sale thereof are;fully set forth
"Official Terms of Bond Sale" attached°hereto as Exhibi
incorporated herein by reference. ; �
6. Official Statement. The�City Clerk and Treas�
other officers or employees of the�City are hereby auth�
participate in the preparation of an official statement
Bonds with The Shaughnessy Company.i j
The motion for the adoption of th! foregoing resol�
duly seconded by member I t and, after fu:
discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon,
following voted in favor thereof: i �
I
�
and the following voted against the sa�e:
�
Whereupon said resolution was dec:
adopted. ;
,
299266.1 2
�ared duly passed
law,
in
,ditions
the
B and
rer and
rized to
for the
tion was
1
the
i
I
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
� �
, NIII�20 �
�
TO: Mayor, City Council and City
FROM: 7ames E. Daniel on i �
Public Works D' to , !
SUBJECT: St. Thomas Academ Ro er's Lake Boat U
Y g .
DISCUSSION:
Request
August 3�., 1995
Attached is a request from Mr. 7oe Reymana; Env'ironmental Studies Class �
to once again have the City grant St. Thomas Academy a variance and allow his clas
operate a motorized boat on Roger's Lake for the purpose of obtaining samples to
their lake studies. ' � �
I i .
RECOIVIlVIENDATION: I �
i
I recommend that the City Council grant the St. Thomas Academy Eaviro �
Studies class a variaace to allow them to operate a motorized pontoon on Roger's
purpose of conducting tests and obtaining samples to continue their lake quality stu�
variance would be granted subject to the times established within their August 27, 1`
of request and the class presenting a report to the City Council on the results of the'
ACTION REOUIRED: i f
I f
If Council desires to implement the recommendation, they should pass a moti
approving a variance allowing St. Thomas Academy to operate a motorized pontaon
Roger's Lake for the purpose of conducting tests and obtaining lake samples subject �
and dates called out in their August 20, 19951etter and subj�ect to the class presentin�
results of the tests to the City Council.
�
I
� � �
to
ce for the
;s. The
�S letter
study.
� the time
the
Ta: hlEndat� Heiqhts Gity Gouncil
Frcm: Jae Re�mann
The purpas� af thi=. letter i4 ta re�uest a wariancp fram th� la�u
prahibiting ma#ors an bcats an Roqer� LaKe sa that we may build upon
the data we a�tain�d and recently �r�sEnted ta yau at a Cauncil
Meeting. �IE w�uld tike ta again appear befare thE Council and Rresent
t�e result� af aur cumulatiUe recards as they are gath�red. Qur
sprin� presentation would then inciude fall and spring data and would
gi�e us the combined appar#unity ta see what changes dre accurrin� on
a yearly b�si�!
The tim�s we wauld be an the laKe in the baat would be canfined
ta the haurs between ane and three during late September and all af
Octaber. We will only hawe class ewery at.her day. Hawe�er, it will b�
as in our pre�ious request - three days ane week �allawed bY t��a days
the next and so an! Not all of these day� wauld we be an the laKe -
weather and schedules woul.d alter our plans.
I appreci�te your censideration af this praposal and am willing
ta Rravi�e you with anY additional infarrnation that You would require.
Au�ust 27, 1955
TO:
i �
i
�
� 1
t
(
i
'� i
I �
�� �
t
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGBTS
� �MII1Z0 ; �
i t
,
1�rlayor, City Council and City Adminis
� i
7ames E. Danielson, Public Works
SUBTECT: Neska. Resigrxati.an
August 2�
�, 1995
DISCUSSION: ;
�
Attached is wxitten notification from 7aha Neska, Utility Leadperson annou ci
,
resignation. 7ohn bas accepted a positian with the City of Newpori as Assistaant Pu li
Supervisor, He plans to continue on as Assista.nt Fire Chief.
i
We recently accepted Street Department Maintenance Worker Cary Pike's si
so we now have two vacancies within Public Works. i The Public Works labor con c
provides that we first past open positions and attempt,to fill them firom within. We �
already eompleted posti.ug for Gary Pike and no one requesteci a traxxsfer to his ,posi c
will now past 7ohn`s Leadperson position, With Jo�ui's positian being an advancem �
maintenance worker, it is somewhat likely that we will receive requests from within b
Leadpersan position, ,
i
We are planning to hald off on advertising for I Gary �Pike's positi.on until we
finished any internal job shifting and ad�ertise for two replacements, thus avoiding
processes. We will select the top two candidates from one list of applicauts.
I
RECU11rIl1�.' {I�NDATIUN: ,
1
Accept 7ohn Neska's resignation and autharize staff to camplete the process f
replacing him. � {
AC7'ION REOUIRED: �
i
If Council desires to implement the recammendation � they should gass a motic
accepting 7ohn Neska's resignation and autharize staff ta complete the pasti.ng and ad
required to replace him.. Recommended replacement canclidates will then be brought
Council for acceptance at a later meeting. �
; �
g his
Works
. We
from
fi11 the
hiring
to
�
T0:
THOMAS J. OLUND PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT
JAMES DANIELSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
THOMAS LAWELL CITY ADMINISTRATOR
JOHN P. MACZKO FIRE CHIEF
GENTLEMEN;
August ,18,1995
I hereby give notice that I will be terminating my employment
with the City of Mendota Heights beginning September 2,1995.
After 20 plus years of service, I find that it is the time in
my career to persue other interests. Please accept this as my
two week notice. I will be available for any questions that
may arise.
Thank You
�/�'t-� �.��
� ohn S. Neska
�
CITY OF MENDOTA
MEMO;
�
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Admini
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanso�/Yls
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Liquor License Hearing - Heritage Inn ,
August 30, 1995
INFORMATION + �
�.
The Heritage Inn of Mendota Heights has submitted a.n application for limited
hotel on-sale liquor and Sunday on-sale liquor license, to allow the sale of liquor at its
The application has been processed by sta.ff and appears to be complete and in conforn
the ordinance. In conformance with the liquor ordinance, Council must schedule and i
public hearing on the application. %
, Since this is an application for a new license, tlie hcense cannot be approved o�
of the initial hearing. Issuance cannot occur unhl the meehng followuig the hearing d�
i �RECONIMENDATION �
I recommend that Council conduct a� ublic he I on the li uor license a lic
P g q PP
September 19, 1995. I
� I
�
ACTION REQUIRED - ',
If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should schedule a public hearing
p.m. on September 19, 1995 for consideration of the Heritage� Inn application for limit�
hotel on-sale and on-sale Sunda.y liquor license. i � �
restaurant.
iance with
;onduct a
the date
�on
- 7:30
service
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
�� • • .
c
,
�
�
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS
�
i
� �
iSeptember 1,
�
Mayor, City Council and City Ad '
I
Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager �j'�
Update on Landscape Improvements to South Kensington Soccer
Request to Increase Tree Budget �
March 7, 1995 Council approved a proposal from Mendota Heights Athletic�
Association for improvements to South Kensington Park totaling $15,000 funded ou
Referendum Fund. �
+
$10,000 Topdress soccer fields and other turf�improvements.
Fields have been topdressed twice, a third treatment will start
and a fourth in October.
$ 4,000 Youth soccer goai sets for Kensingto � and Victoria Highland ]
(Purchased and in place. Total cost $1,700).
$ 1,0{}0 Thick planting of pine trees to provide a noise, wind, and visc
(Subject of this memo). �
The Mendota Heights Athletic Association has contacted staff and will provi�
planting crew to install trees purchased by the City. �
Mendota Heights Athletic Association was informed,that $1,000 could only t
12' to 15' pines. After discussing this they agreed that 50 to 6U small 2' to 3' pines
acceptable and that they �cauld nQt provide an effective bamer for ten plus years.
EXISTING PLANTING SCREEN BEHIND FENCE �
When the park was constructed in 1993 nine twenty foot high Ash trees and o
twelve foot high Oak trees were installed between the fence and the freeway and at t
end of the field. All of these trees survived.
In 1994 City Park Crew installed fifty four to six foot high lilac bushes from
tree nursery. These are doing well.
and
of the
barrier.
a
four
uld be
en �-
south
; City
CURRENT PLANTING PLAN
The sixty small pine trees would be installed in clumps or in staggered lines to provide
a future barrier. Installation will be by volunteers from the Mendota Heights Athletic
Association and will be watered and maintained by City Park Crews.
: ' • ►�lul .I� : r • .
I recommend that Couacil increase the tree budges from $1,000 to $3,300 ($2,300
balance of soccer goal budget) and that larger trees, six foot tall Colorado and Black Hills
Spruce trees be purchased and planted by volunteers from the Mendota. Heights Athletic
Association. I also recommend that a local contractor be hired to auger/drill the holes for
these larger trees the auger would pulverize the soil where the tree ball would go and increase
the survivability rate of the new trees. Purchase of thirty (30) six foot trees, delivered, plus
sales tax would be $2,438.00. The contractors fee to auger the holes is a time and equipment
charge which should be around $6U0 to 800.00.
I_���ti . : � �Ti�i: :��
If Council so desires to adopt the recommendation to increase the tree budget from
$1,000 to $3,300 they should direct staff to issue a purchase order to Bork Tree Farms in the
amount of $2,438.00, for thirty (30) six foot spruce trees, hire a contractor to auger planting
holes, and coordinate the installation of the trees with the volunteer help offered by the
Mendota Heights Athletic Association.
m
TO:
FROM:
SUB7ECT:
f
�
t
!
�
a
CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS
!
t
�Q
_i � ..
Mayor, City Council and City
Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager
Replacement Bridges in Wentworth,
`��.`C�[i�Y.�ii�A
�
September 1, 1
and Rogers Lake Park
Wood foot bridges were installed in these three pai�ks in the early 1970's.
wood piles driven into the banks they have required maintenance almost every yea
frost hea.ves, stress on connections points, and deterioration of the wood.
�
The Parks and Recreation Commission determined that the bridges should 1
with steel bridges and in certain locations with culverts. 1'he total budget to cone�
bridges (one in Valley aad three in Wentworth) was $35,000 wluch would come fi
Special Pazk Fund.
The Commission recommended that three steel bridges be purchased with t
in Wentworth Park. The budget of $35,000 would have to be increased approxim�
$10,500 if three bridges are purchased. The plan to be described replaces the tlur�
location with a culvert. �
Bids were received in late 1994 to replace only the Valley Park Bridge whi�
estimated to cost $10,0{}0. The bids ranged from $25,000 to $37,000. Repairs w�
the wood bridge by the Parks crew with the intention of rebidding the job in 1995.
Tlus summer the Park Maintenance Crew rted�that the wood bridpe in
� e b
Park needed extensive maintenance. This bridge was previously discussed by the ]
Recreation Commission and determined that it would be replaced with a culvert wl
wood bridge became unrepairable. +
,
:��� - ... � �. .
The Rogers Lake bridge brings the total to five wood bridges that must be
With a budget of $35,000 this can only be done if two are�',replaced with steel bric
other three by culverts. I have received reliable bids and quotes for the various o
required to do this project. The City will act as Generai Contractor and bid the R
categories. `t
t
. � -
�
�
I
►ttached to
due to
� replaced
:four
im the
�o installed
:ely �
bridge
h I had
�e made to
:ogers Lake
�rk and
;n the
aced. - - - � -�
and the
tions
in five
1. Provide two (2) prefabricated steel bridges $14,202.84
2. Crane service to unload and place bridges 4,500.00
3. Concrete firm to prepare concrete footings 6,0{}0.00
4. Excavator to remove three bridges, install culverts, bacl�ill and
prep for trail � 7,000.00
5. Asphalt contractor to restore 8 foot trails 3,500.00
$35,202.84
City crews will remove and dispose of old bridges and provide and restore each site.
:'. �►�lul'.I� • Y •.
I recommend that City Council approve the bridge replacement plan as outlined above
and accept the bid from Continental Bridge for two steel prefabricated bridges. It will take
eight weeks for fabrication and delivery. During this time fum bids will be accepted for the
remaining portions of the plan. Culverts will be installed at three locations as soon as bids are
approved.
� Y•. :'• 11:'�
If Council so desires to proceed with the bridge replacement plan as detailed above they
should direct staff to issue a purchase order in the amount of $14,202.84 to Conti.nental Bridge
for the fabrication and delivery of two streel pedestrian and light vehicle bridges and further
direct staff to seek fum bids for the remaining portions of the work.
�
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BF APPROVED BY CITY
A,s�?halt Coatractor Licease
Bill & Co., Inc.
ConcretefMasonrv Contractor I,icease
A& H Cement Construction, Inc.
General Contractor License
A Top Roofing & Construction, Inc.
Blaeser Landscape
Steenberg & Watrud Constuction Inc.
D.L. Property Report
Dave Taylor Construction Co., Inc.
Gas Pi�ing Contractor License
Metro Air
SVAC Contractor License
Metro Air
Drvwall Coatractors License
Donald Goodroad
. � `i :. �: • � •ri. �a':; :'<<'y>'.�:: ... ".;°y,'�..;`, ' i
,.i,.: :. V ..%:: ' %y" °''�'y ��y r`}�/'�`iri,'::K 2'a�"�'�'n�'• ,��j �' � �y� �<� ,�'
.s . ' ;;�;.: C:jr' c'i;.; � .'��Y..'''�'-.:`�j.12�� t�'a/,;�✓'t��y-,+'e�s':�'yr,�`��� + .�.
:>>:��(7��•��r• r��q ,.���.0,'^�'.v"7•';'rc''.�C�`;/.sC�'^v:;'•i. •.� e�a.
>.. :i+:' •��. - ::?: ^.r•��_' . -,:Pa.%!:p,^.�'• e.; :.:i>:::.;;fi,�• :�.�7c�1������'�
��'&;wiir;;.: s iy'.r +.�; �,'� :�,.,: . ..4s.�••'.S'.., ir..:..; :;,�•x•. .:9„�t;.:1 {.�'.
E^!Jr.:.t,... - •.� .::;�; : %:t-.f;:�'�w '' ;�;•'a •s� `-.: i"-�' , .. .;j>sst> �: ' ''yr �' "`-
=i:.�°°•. _ y:a:; 'iz .•�i Y �:.:. �{.., l'%+..SS.rIy.; �.',�,�,-.`:,,,t� °f":y-:�
..�? ` x�i ;r".��� ' : , .± :.v. : i
. 'ri; . . ` ' -.., , • • - ' • • .__ • �•,. t?7;;: .. . ; . :{
. • . - . , < . . : . <. . ; ,
� .. , • ,� • - . . . • ,:�;. . '� i
� �`�: . , ' . . . ., . � , .
�:4 n •. • ` . _.i w,o-< ,::j ��':�,c�. •r�i�i-::5:''�'� .
� •.y., ';.N•.�'y. �.
':�7. �, �L' '!Olni-�; • ':1'4. }:P\\�r .�r.. ryi�J: Y , s.:.. �. �.4 1
�:.�s'�:;;..� •^:i;'Y`i"V �,:-
; •., , .., • : .� ..
, �a:���,%� .. . ;'ot,;1k . .•.. • c;�'ry•;I�•ry��,.;�.''
�f ' • . :}: .. �"i;d.�- 2:i.;�:,•
. <:.t:.��^'i,,� .> =;�. i; �;' - . �•���.
• � •��'; '�",ll_ l�<�:.
., .. � ' � . , t`-~ ` i: . ;r.r :: , :'.p. � �..,�. .
., .. . , .. . . . 'Lo'L.r•: ' ' . ' . .:'a:.i:;. ; �,:.� ...:r�....
,,. _ . . - .. ' .__ ..: . � . .. ._ i
September 5, 1995
TO: Hayvr and Citg Coancil
. �5 TSST �' .
Totttl. Clais2s
2U4,s21
Si9nificant Cl.aims .
eit,.minous Roadwdysl o�•erlay 3,417 •
ISU 19/ park mtcn • 13,226 •
' Med Centers health ins 11,655
MWCC sewer chg 71,556
NSP utilities 5,455
���+ � . ` '
Fire Relief Assn state atd 39,510
Ratwik Roszak labor negotiations 4,702•
TMI Coatings water tower 3,315
t �
; -�; :. �., ;;. �.., �
;;�'. .. . . _ . . . , �r_�:•_;j :.=.:;z.:�<. a,�: . .
• ''.5�� , , • �. :� ;>'�,i`, �'.i:�?i.:::, '+'�. +
..' ' _ ' . : i ;i: �1,;�„� .
; -ifi"' _ . . . ,' . . . �. � ^Y•`.t:' � . .
�"ii 1" _ . . .. � . ����:'' ��. ,.� �+'.
.. - �� . , ' ., w. '.Sst� . x
•, �:; � , . ' . . ' . . , , � .. ' .
�''A�'il:�r �:��.`' ' _ .'�' : ,. .. ��''..(�" fi.. f,(T,'i. ��'}� •� =� �; � .
;;•� :�;; �$F: S! �,i�•�.•••
"rn`,.1�.� :.. ' "�^`x� .:.' ', :•'ic:��=, .r:o- ,�*.
,•,,,eW�:y1''y���'i.i;�;': 'f':�: , ., '�*w: .�9i'_, .• "r�.� . ; ., . �ci'x,:CJf . .iSf� :...: ... . , . , • . .
�;,•1`i�:lt;3�����a�Fra .. .. � . i f"'::_;.,... ' ..:: �.� '''�::.:�; ;p � . . i
JS. � � yy
C•�"�,Y�i i:" "��� .� �R�i �7 `�ii�iK'.-�`;•'ij:F' .
�,i Z��,`�,.,+,"'�,isn';;�ti:. . � , ."'k� '' _� , .� . ,.. • . .. _r - . . `i. . >�`"�;:` . . . •,
. �, .
- SeD Clairns Lis•t � uak+� lU�MUIN ueot bU-Koatls= p�ge 1 �^
�"''� Fri 4. �M • 9�5�95 City of Mendota hea � 15-cngr 60-Utili�ties �,.
20-Police 70-Parks
� Ternp Check Number 1 30-Fire 80-Planning.
40-CEO ts5-Recycling �
Temp. y0-Animal Control
(;j Check
M Nurnber Vendor Name Account Code Comrnents Arnaunt �
1 Advance Soecialties 01-4330-215-70 _-_-_ �
{��' SP1Ys 74. 31
1 74. 3I
� iotals Ternp Check ivumaer i �
Temp Cherk Nurnber �
2 iaT&i 0i-42irt1-@2@-2Fi sept svc ,^s3.am �
2 AT&T �71-42i0-a50-5� sept svc I1.26
r...; 2 AT&T 0i-42iE-070-70 . seot svc ii.26 �
2 AT&T i5-42i0-060-60 sept svc 11.27
2 A i& o Qti-4G10-P.�70-7&1
�'1 2 AT&T 0i-42i0-110-10 sept svc 14.68
�� 2 A'r&T ld calls 22.25
di-4210-0^c0-2a ld calls 23,7B �
2 AT$T 01-4c^i0-030-30 ld svc 5.30
� I6 ` 132.80 �
• Tatals Temp Check ��umber 2
� Temp Check Rumber 3 Q
� 3 A B C Rer�tals 01-433@-215-70 rprs 76.60 Q
3 76. 60
� Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 3 �
Temp Check Nurnber ' 4 ,
� 4 Air Conditioning Assoc Inc @i-4335-315-30 rprs 550.92 Q
� 4 5.�,@.92
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 4 Q
� Temp Check 1Vumber 5 �
5 Albinson 27-4305-709-Q�0 �plys 17.74
^.� 5 Albinson 05-4305-105-15 splys 114.39 �
5 Albinson 05-4305-105-15 �plys 42.8i
5 Alhfnson 05-4305-105-15 splys 41.44
� 5 Rlbinson @5-4305-1@5-15 splys i4.06
. (: j
25 230. 44
;�� Totals Temp Check Number 5
Temp Check Number 6
'� 6 Americ�n Planning Assn 0i-43@0-@8@-80 renewal 50.00 �'1
� 6 i0. @0
Totals Temp Check IVumber 6 Q�
.�
._f �^�
--� ?
. �
..'?�5.>n;`r °' ..Z'i:'-��s",\�: -yE . .,ir : .5>.�'��t�•.,;: � - --- —✓fa'�':> :'�'i '� .y� . _ :
.. �..`n;S:'rti�;.. •n�..� � .... - . t � :t'v. ::^r .:C..K i✓�.•., .,4\..1:..�/:'•^.'� ^ .. ''4.:�.tv<+./.±�.:•S�iT' ..7�i.:.. .... .:S.u� .. _ . . .. . �. ..
� . T.. r..h . .... . .. . :.1.;, ... .. .. ::<... .. �er.:.�ani:�:.:.:..s�.......... .. ..,. .if�....•-��!?y.... .:�u. . _ ...'�! . . ..t.�:..1.. � .. . �+�'v
Y
} 1 Sep 7 Claims List ` r^age �
" Fri 4i �M City af �ienda�a Hei, �
� Temp Check Number 7
7emp.
(`� " Check
Nurnber Vendor Name Account Code
r••�, 7 American Natianal 8ank 35-42�6-000-00
" 7 Rmerican Natian�2 L�ank 88-4226-�10Q-80
� 14
iotals TemR Check Number 7
Temo Check Numaer &
8 Arneric�n Test Center V�i-43a�-460-3�1
. $
Tatals Temp Check Number 8
Temp Gheck IVumSer 9
; � . 5 Situminaus R��dway � 2E-k46Q3-G700-0+�
9
Tatals Tetnp Check il4umber 9
Temp Check iVumber 1�
--^} �
'� 10 Befort Rt�ofing 01-4335-3.5-3�t
•••5 � Yt
"' iatals Temp Check tUumber 10
� Temp Gheck lVumber 11
11 Board af Water Cammissianers 01-4425-3i0-50
11 Hoard of Water Commissianers �d1-4425-310-70
�� 11 8oard of Water Commissioners i5-44c^5-�10-6@
il Board af Water Commis�ianers tdi-4485-325-.�tL
� li Soard of Water Commissianers Q�8-A425-000-0fA
11 Hoard of Water Cammissianers 01-k4�5-070-70
11 Bo�rd af Water Commissianers 02-k42S-07@-70
•.� __
... '77
Tatala Temp C,heck flumDer 11
... Terop Check litumber 1^c
�•, 12 Border 5tate Znd 01-4305-050-5t�
... fz Barder 5tate ind 01-4305-050-8@
Cc�rnments
svc fee
svc fee
rprs
final street c+ver-l�y
- • rprs
�ul svc
. ,�ul �vc
�ul svc
3u1 svc
�ul svc
�ul svc
3u1 svc
splys
Frnaunt
ca4.95
250. 25
5�5. ^c�D
3, 4 i 6. 65
3, 4 i 6. 65
125. 0Qt
i 25. 0tc1
36. 58
35.58
.. a6. 58
23. 26
256= 07
I� 121.81
866. 97
2� 383. �5
3'7. 06
--
. 36. :s7 (.,,'1
Tatals 7emp Check Number 3�
� Temp Check Number i3 �
13 C�nvas Rroclucts Q�1-4305-030--30 splys 161.79 _
} __ _----- �...�
• 1�y . i61.79
� ' . �
�y,� '�Y j ;X � „1 , ti��''� �.:;; � il+: .. .
i . ' ♦ �, , t�.�• � ���' K• .;,'; ::� ..�:�;�. _v,;,: . .
�+::�+:.r.3%:2+w :.... .. .. . .. . . .. . _ ' ' . _ c. ...e <r -.a.."_�' '.� •�±�'1��" _ _' �:S[ ..s . _a%��.;� . __?�r �.?�.•.,..�-. �:a_.ti;4:... _. , , 1��. ��,�`$;£'!k. - . ....G ._ ., ._ r:s:, . ..... .. . .
: , `' ': 't .�rt.is:��=+;�^�� ' .�:,: �'`
, 1 g�� �' Claims �isi
Fri 4: A City af Mendata Heiy
'7 Temp Gheck Number l3
Temp.
"'•� Check
� Number Vendor Name Accaunt Code
'� Tatais Temp Check Number 13
Terop Cheek Number ik
� 14 Carquest 01-433�-k90--7k1
i4 Garc}uest 01-A330-44�Zt-�Q
28 �
TataAs 7emo Cnecx tiumher 14
Tetnp Chc?ek yumbei^ i5
• 15 Centrai ^atation Aiarm Assn k11-44@0-iS0-3�
15
'1 Tatal.s Temp Check i�umber , IS
. Temp Check Nurnber 16
.:�
� 16 City Motor 5upply 01-4330-kQ5-4Q�
16 City hiotor 5upply 01-4330-460-30
; lb Gity MatQr Supp2.y @1-433G1-44�-��+
' ib City Motor Suppiy 01-433�-490-50 ••
16 Gity Matcm Supply Q1-4330-490-50
F6 Gity Motor 5uppiy 01-433@-490-70
` 16 City Motar Supply @1-k330-440-20
16 City Mator Suppl$� 01-4330-460-30'
'j 128 �
� Tatals Tem{s Check iVumber 16
Temp Check Number i?
� 17 City of 5t Paul 27-k46@-830-0�C
f 17
Totals Temp Gheck IVumber i7
Temp Check IVnrnber 18 ��
1 •
' f8 City af �'rior L�ke QS-4400-11�-10
18
' Totals Temp ChecFc Nutnber i8
'�emp"C ec um er 1�
19 Contact Mobile Communica�ic�ns 0i-433Q-44@-�P1 '
� '..
� 19
Tatal� Temp Cherk Number 19
Camments
parts
parts
spiys
parts
p�rts
parts
parts
parts
parts
parts
parts
�^prs
mu»ici pal� "
rprs
_ �"'"�fF:F � . 3' t &p'? 'G",��, `,,+�{+�.� ,fc� "t a ro7 ,va;. .nn;.�,�.; :,r•: �..,�r.. f L�r �,{ �. '. ,.„•a.•i.••.;;� �r • ,^�; > +�.. � :.�;•;.
�`c�..: bs.��.. �5s'��'��3.� ��z.��'i3" ��:. ��is�'o� _ � .' . _ '§��.s,-'��.i"�s.�£` .
Page 3
Amaunt
8. 80
7v�. 29
7'3. i 5
�i ^c. 3V1
26. 59
42. 92
547=44
242. 20
360. 73
52. S 1
31b. 71 }
1,4i5.00
937. 58
9^s7. 58
72. Q�0
7c^. @�
975. 0Q�
975. 00
�
.� 1 Sep 7 Claims List � Page 4 �
Fri 4, �M City af Mendota Hei , .
�'� Temp Check NumDer �Q� �
Ternp. s
Check �
'� Number Vendur Name Accour�t Code Comments Arnount �
. 20 Cornmercia2 Asphait 01-4422-05@-50 we�r mix 1,384.83 �
20 --------
1 � 384. 83
� Totals Ternp Check IVumber �@ �
Temp Check Ivurnber 21
2I Continental Safety Eq @1-430�-07@-7�c't splys :72.Sa '1
21 Continental Safety cq iS-43a5-060-60 splys 32.34
;"1
42 204.84
Totals Terno Check Number ^ci
Temp Check Number c2 !�
"•� 22 Connect Inc � Q�1-4210-030-3@ �ul svc
, 17. 0kl {.-�
, ZZ -----
Totals Temp Check Number ^c2 ,
17. @Q
.. �.�
._•}
Temp Check IVurnber 2� '
�� • 23 Copy DuQlicating Products 01-4305-050-5�r �• {.�
__ splys g,Q7
....- 23 8. @7
Totels 7emp Check l�umber 23 �„i
:::� Temp Check Nurnber 24 , , • �,
24 Crawforo Daor 01-433@-490-50 rprs gQ�,OQ�
24 Crawford boor 0i-433@-490-50 discount 1.00cr
24 Crawford Door 08-4335-00@-00 {..7
rprs .. 163. Q�0
24 Crawford Door 08-4335-0Q0-@0 discount 3.26cr
� 96 208.74 �
Totals Temo Check Nurnber 24
" Temp Check Number 25 :..1
25 Creative Colors 01-4330-2i5-70 splys hockey rinks 1�62@.45 t•-�
25 Creaiive Colc,rs 01-433@-2i5-70 splys hockey rinKs 3m'7,�9 •••
• 50 1 92B.24
iata�s Temp-6heek-NFam ,.,
Temp Check Number 26
�..a
26 Cunningham Sports 01-4435-20@-70 � splys 117.13
� 26 117. i3 �
Totais 7ernp Check I�umber 26
'r �
� }
�l - .
J � �..�
—�,"�''•^:$��'�v. :w.%{�' '•..�::'C�:,`x� R% '`l:'•:' 1�,•. �.,,)+:`�t�::"a� i' :\ :.\::� ��:. l. .�'•��6... � z.-:' —
�`:: � ..�t. n..�,. +..+.3:x-�:.•. �.,• `` :'�• ,a. .,s.. L'- �i.�.i..; �4. ti..:.. . •. at ...�.. •f� • .�� � P: "` :Y� _ , . , , . ; i'`5`.v!-.... � ' - .-. . .
. . Y�•: ... . '71t�i . . , �... .. . ,.�-.c!. . . . .. .. -. _ r , . .. .. . . ... . ' _ . . . �. ,. ... . � , �w � - -�
....-.�:Z. ��,. . -tf�... .. ,. :�>>'a...,. •S%:. v�.,:;i:a:. .:::^ .�.�..�a....s.. n :..4�:?: . =.r�..S.�....G�. . r».:,'1 . ,�-r.^.�: �
"'''� FrSeP4y �M Claims List ' Page 5 • �
City c,f Mendata He� ,
(,j�, Temp Check Number 27 Q
Temp.
�� Check
Number Vendor Name Account Code Cc+mrnents Arnount �
!'� 27 Custorn Fire Apparatus 01-433Q�-460-3@ parts 425.00 �
27 425. Z0
� Totals Temn C:�eck Number 27 �
Temp Cherk iVumSer 28
� 28 Dahlgren S`�ardiow Uban Q�i-42^c0-135-80 ; i
� un svc ��3. Q;�
28 Dahlqren Shard?ow Uban 0i-42�1-1JJ—EQ1 �ul retainer 1,S33.68
28 Dah:gren SnardioH Uban 0i-422Qt-135-80 ,7u1 tree ord 373.06
84 -------- �
c^, 245. 74
r"j Tatals iemp Check tVumber 28 �
Temp GhecFc Number 2�
� 29 James Danieisan � 05-4415-105-15 sept allow 120.@0 �
� 29 i2cfs. @0
Totals Temp Check Nurnber 2'3 Q
� Temp Check Ivurnber 3Q+ O
30 Danka Emgcy Eq 01-4305-@3@-30 spiys I,931.@Q�
� 30 Danko Erngcy Eq 01-43a�-@30-30 spiys 1�050.00 �
3@ Danka Emgcy Eq 01-43@5-03@-30 air test 30.00
92� � ` • Q
� Tatals Temp Check Nurnber 3m " 3@11.00
`"� Temp Check Nurnber 31 �
31 D C Mech�nical 01-3255 rfd perrnit fee 5.5@
� 3� 5.50 �
Totals Temp Check IVumber 31
i�
Temp Check Number 32. J
:�'� 32 Denttis De2mant 0i-4415-02¢+-20 sept al low , 120. @0 �-�
32 12@.@0
'�� Totals Temp Check Number 32 {.�—
Temp Check Number 33
M� �,. �
33 First Trust 4�-4226-000-@Q� , svc fee 657.75 -
� 33 657.7� �
Totals Temp Checlt Number 33
� Temp Check Number 34 �
(:.1
.� . �;
-:��" ,.���',`.v �r„^r.�;:•ti`�a`,}��a� • .r..;•:�,;:•:�', ,.,•:•.� ,�: ., �•:��. :i:,_(�
- �� 1: .K. : i.. •;Yy:: L'% . 1: .��,.,:
:"_',. y 'C.N \� .W ^l% k�s' •:.?�'.,•
;2� ' :•;�,.,
::6. � . 1 . .^' . .
.:�;..:,:, "/ '.• ..L .. "
+:4 . � . s
... , x � .._. >
__4+`. _. ._ . .. , . 'n .c.. . . �
.. .e. . "e:'4r.•- h , . `J' . ..r .ti... n' , .
•\r+ ... . . �. i_:rC'. > rr' :,f; _ , 'jt.':2' .. l`C` . .
. - .. ��'Y. ��:ti�:%c:i5'i...'9kk::•:.13 .•R` < D:.'v''�.�., .. ....a: ��i•'�C. . . ..1::.. . . . .w f . .. . -a. ..r:.,a..�_.. . .7.:. .�;.'�.. . '� � .�:k.�:..- .
.. . .. . i. . ... ^�%'-. . . r. �C::'.:r� . 'f�n��. . K.<ti, Jfk.'•._ ., �
.i 1 �ep ]
Fri 4: M
� Temp Gheck Number 34
Temp.
'"'} Check
Number Vendar Name ,
'"': 34 �'lexible �ipe 7aa1
34
� Tatals Temo Gheck Nurnber
Temp Check Number 3S
35 FortiS &enefits In� Cc+
35
' Tatals Temp Checic i�#umber
"'� Temp Check Nurnoer 36
36 Globe Printing & Supplies
�"� 36 Glabe Printing & Supplies
36 �io�e Printing & Supplies
36 Glabe Printing & Supplies
�• 36 �lobe Printing tF Supplias
" 36 Olobe Printing t4 Supplies
36 Glabe Frinting & Supplies
-� ___
..` 2S2
Tatals Temp Check Nurnber
....�
"�` Temp Check Number 37
-� 37 W W �rair,ger
37
�•4 7crta2s "Cemp Gheck Numbe�^
Temp Gheck lVumber 38
� 3� �raham Mfg i� Teresa �arlock
�•� 38
'= Tatals Temp Cherk tVumber
Temp Check Number _ s9
39 Group lie�lth Inc
.'� 39
ClaimS List '
City af Menauta Hei_ 3
Account Code
I5-4330-490-6+2!
s4
2� i -k 13c:-03 i ^3�i1
35 �
01-4305-020-2Q
01-4305-020-20
Et1-43fD5-QJ3sB-30
01-4305-�50-50
01-4305-07Qs-70
:5-4305-060-6Qt
01-43@S-02Q�-2@
36 �
0f -4335-310-70
37
Q! 1-�+13i -@20-20
38
05-4133-105-15
Camments
parts
seQt prem
sply5
sply�
splys
splys
splys
s¢lys
splys
pat^ts
sept prem garlock
sept prem ku2lander
��ge 6
Arnaur�t
2 Q+6. 50
206. 5ttr
i b3. 4d
i 63. 4Zt
239. 63
33. 00
33. Q�0
33. 00
33. Q�5
33.03
2Qt. �1
424. 92
c^1. $2 �
21. 82
9�. 85
92. 85
3 841. 35
Tatals iem C
� Temp Check lVumtrer 40 ���?
� 4@ Jim iiatcri Sales @1-4330-k90-70 parts 39.05 �
40 ,Tim Hatch Sa3es 15-4330-490-60 parts 3'�.05
gQ 78. 10 i- ti
'` Totals Tem¢ Check IVumbar 40 .
.� � ��
.. \. ., .\\�i<� .2.:�2�!1„ nR ti�Y:' ' �' f�t .r oY';::Vi.a� ... :'!�f%���+:�.,_•. ::;i�
. „e. . . _ . . . . s 3 -` . —` -'- -' - `— '� - - --. . . . . . .. `'"rsaG::'^'-[%itri'. -., e:v `:'-��'.�ti:�,..._ *.�a'ti�ai5:. __._ .. . _ . . - .. ._ _ .:<.> . .. . . ... , _ t:::; ° : . .� .-�.a . . ,, o.,.:r -S�r�i. . ,
� 1 g�� - Claims List ` Page 7 �
Fri 4 �M City af Mendata Hea s
� Temp Check Number 42 . � �
Ternp.
Check [1
�� Number Vendar Name Account Code Carnments Arna�rrit
41 Ndwe H�nk 01-4305-@��-SQ� sply� 3.i.59 �
41 Hdwe iianic QiI-k3Qf5-030-30 splys 3�.51
41 i-3dwe Fiank 01-43�25-03t3-30 d'zscaur,t s.7ic�^
� i23 47.ti9 �
7r�ta2s Terno Gheck Number 41
�?
Temp Ch�cic �lurnver 42 �-
42 Hoffers Inc @1-433�-c15-7k'� rprs 870.ii r^�
qz 87tr. 2 i
-••; Toials Temp Check iVumber 42 ('j
Temp Check Nurnber 43
r«� , a
... 4Ts Inver �rave F'ord Ri-4330-490-S�d rprs I38.33
�3 138. 33 �
' Tatals TemQ Gheck Number 43
...� � Temp Check Nnmber 44 (�
A4 1 5 D 197 01-4268-070-7Q� sibley park rntcn 13,226.55
"` k4 13, 226. 55 �
Tatala Ternp Check Nu'raber 4k ' .
, �
"' Temp Check IVumber 45
45 Pau2 Kaiser Q�1-Q268-i50-30 aug sve 1, 55Q�. s0 �
� 45 Paul Kaiser 01-k425-030-3Q� exp reirnb . i�.02
� 9e 1,561,82 �
Tcatal� Temp Gheck Number 45
� Temp Check Number 46 (�
46 Kaplen �ros 0i-k305-050-SQ� @laves 61-.�.,0
�;� ' , . �
.. pg 61.50
7atals Temp Gheck EVumber 46
-` Temp Check ititurnber 47
• 47 Knutsan Rubbish Serviae �8-k335-000�00 aug svc ?8.fl9 {:,1
47 7fi. 0�
� Tatals Temp Check hiumber 4� �j
Temp Check Number 48 •
.j ;: '�
'' 48 7harnas Knuth 85-4415-72k4-00 exp reirnb i5.37
� � �' �
rh•' 1 �KM ��• AJ� . M .. .
:E �,,y : i,':�k. ,,:.�s,�; ' .i.:xi� �: hi�'•u>:;��is,. �.. ` .V...:._ - � �'�:�� • " .. ,. . . . ...... .. . . .. . - , -
`'' :a,'�: s. =;?,�•,;r;,,,..'Sb•'r'tF?: ..2,>.�.,y�s�..r>:.�C.�, . :.'i7.:�..�c�•:..
_ .. .c ,. , _ . _ '-�S'�.� � YA... :a�.e�`�+ � ``�-`"�:!fr,�er-i�.M1:%:: .v�:p�.K i.�+-: : . s.. '�- . �:v:.=4..'� _��':`::::.L:•• ... ........., d..� - . .. .
. . . . . _ _ _ . _ . . _ e0'` _. _ ' �. }`: . :�f<.� . ..
1 1 Sep 1 �
' Fri 4: M
�
Temp Check Number 48
Temp.
"'�y Check
"' Number Vendor i�ame
� 48 Thornas Knuth
48 Thamas Knuth
48 Thoroas Knuth
� A8 7harn�s 'r(nuth
48 ihamas Knuth
k8 Tharn�s Kr'�uth
336
7utais Temp Cneck Numtrer
Temp Gheck IUurooer 49
��� 49 Krecn� Busir�ess 8ystems
49 Krechs Business 3y�tems
k9 Krechs Business Sy�tems
:> k9 K�^echa Busine�s Systerns
156
"•Y 'iatals Temp Check Number
Ternp Check Nurn�er 50
" 50 Krereer Spring & Align
... 50
`" Tat�ls Temp Check Number
'� Temp Check Numher 51
81 l, E L 8
..� 52 .
Totals Temp Cherk h4umDer
� Temp G�heek iUumber 52
•.� 52 Guy Kullander
' 52 �uy Kullander
S2 Quy Kullander
S2 �,uy Kullander
5� �uy Kul iar�der
52 Guy Kullander �
S2 fi�uy Kullantier
52 C�uy Kullandar
S2 Gu Kullander
�5 �ws
" 468
Tatals 7emp Gherk Number
� Temp Check Number 53
Claims �ist �
City af Mendata Hei
Account Cade
i6-A4i5-642-00
27-�44 i, S-7 i 0-QtQt
27-4415-7@9-t3Q!
27-k415-7i6-00
c^7-44i5-7i3-m0
@5-k4:5-105-15
48
P�i-�+330-490-i 0
01-430tL-110-i@
05-43@0-105-15
01-430P1-1T�80-80
49
0i-4330-460-3Qi �
50J
01-2075
5k
E7-k41S-710-00
05-449fl-f05-IS
�i-4490-1@9-0�
06-4335-0@0-00
�9-4415-f313ID-@0
0k-4415-000-00
37-4330-479-00
16-4490-0rD@-!d0
JryG
Carnment s
exp reimb
exp reimb
exp reimb
exp reimb
exp reirnb
Sept 8ilow
rprs
splys
splys
splys
rpr`s 2E82
seot dues
exp reirnb
exp reitnb
exp reimb
exp reimb
exp reimb
exp reirnb
exp reimb
exn r im
exp reimb
aage 8
Fimount
33. 8@
87.87
5. 80
57. �i
8. 93
i F2i. Qf2t
�19. 54
8�.�i. QiQ
87.58
97. 98
9�.98
378.94
i � ic18= ^c5
i � 089. c^5
364. 00
36�4. 00
1 s. 92
5k.$4
c2. 8"�'c
28.C3
42. 92
20. 30
20. 59
"S'I�tE�
5. �C2
219.92
n
. 53 Labar Relations Assn @1-4400-110-f0 ragr I45.@0 •
� ' , . �...:
.e• -. � - o- • �. .,t t`� •, _ �'�tn,:.;; . ��.'r1.-.`�-�"' ��a:.,.r;"� tii'L�,` :a.. �.• %." ,� �':w . "'^'%::_, . •�:!;,.•r
�:� . ..... _ • �i::Et?:�''�k�.,. %71 . _ .., "�Cfi�ae'3.c,,. < ,. � -r_-_ .:ii�'_ '� , �..�f;.��-.�"�.�•�' o: `.,""�•., s a;,>.�:-.c?:.:;�. -t:—'�•�o.-. �v K.2.fu'..*� , .
:c ti 'b;� y $a� +��'i+'r'`sx.._.:ax':.�.�..'':sS.: �:ti?�....,�..., .... _.. . . -
�} 1 Se p '
Fri 4 PM
,�.��. Tetnp Check Numbar 53
7emp.
(�1 Gheck
Number Vendar hfame
i ;:'t 53
' iatals Ternp C�eck Number
� Temp Check Nurnber 54
54 L�ke Cauntry Ch�pter
54
Tata2s Ternp Eneck 14umber
' 'i
" Temp Check M1iurntaer 55
*,� 55 M 7hatnas Lawell
SS
� Totals Ternp Check Number �
Temp Check Numher i6
� 56 Leef Hros
56 Leef Bros
t'.�, ' S6 �eef Bras
168
�, "iotals iemp Check iVucnber
Temp Check Number ' S7
� S7 Lincoin Penefit
57 1_incoln Benefit
� 57 Linca2n Re»efit
f71
� Tcstals Temp Gheck Number
Temp Check iUumber S8
� 58 Richard Ma�;ek
�, ,,._
� 58
Tatals Temp Check Nu�nber
� Temp Check Number ' S9
59 Mac Wareho s
Tatals Temp Gheck tVuaEber
� Temp Check Namber fif�
:� 60 Mike MePhiilips Inc
1
'�i:`.� ��',."e�'�'..a�..i .�'l�E'.$�..#`$�e`.":..�±;�-.�'�:.����'�'.�
Clairns Li�t �
City of {�endaLa He._ rs
pccount Catle
J�
0 i -44fZi�Zt- i 5Qt-3�
54
01-�4415-1i0-10
55
Y1-A335-320-50
01-k335-310-7�
15-4335-3i0-60
J�
01-207'4
01-4131-020-2Q1
0I-4i3i-110-1Q�
5?
01-3250
5$
��
01-A337-0:,?J-50
Cararnent s
regr- kaiser
sept allow
aug svc
aug svc
aug �vc
sept prem
sept prem
sept prern
rFd permit o/chg
software
rprs
Rage �
Amount
f 45. f�i�
i�5. ft�0
i25. Q�D
i 75. 0@
3?5. 00
17. 25
2 7. 25
17. 30
5i.8@
;
k�. 00
387.i1
i38. i0
565. 21
9. 30
9. 30
871. 25
�
�
1 Sep ' ' Clairns List '
FrY 4 �M City of Mendat2 He, s
Temp Checic iUumber b0
Ternp.
Checit
Number uendor Name pecaunt Code
6Q iike Mc�hil:ips Inc 01-4337-�50-50
220
Tot�l� Temp C;�eck iVumber 60
Temp Check Number 6i
61 John �iaczico 0i-44¢�k�-Q30-30
62
Tntals Temp Checit Nurnber 6i
Temp Check lVum�er 6�
62 Menards @1-4305-@50-50
-- �
62 ,
Tatals Temp Check IVumber 62
Temp Check Numtrer 63
63 Med Centers H R 01-207k
fs3 �iEi� �EEM'CEi^S }�{ P Qil—$i�1-1 i0-�20 '
63 Med Centers H P 01-4131-02@-20
63 Med Centers N P 01-4;31-040-k0
63 Med �enters H P 0f-4I31-050--50
63 Med Cer'�ters H P' 01-4131-070-70 �
63 Med Center� H P 05-4131-105-15
53 Med Center� N R 08-4232-000-4I@
63 Med Centers H R 15-4131-060-6fl
567
Tota15 Temp Check Number 63
Tem{a Check Nurnber 64
64 Mendota Height Fire Relief Ass 08-4490-@@Q�-0@
64
?�tals Temp Check Number 64
'Femp Check hlumber 65
65 Metro Urnpire Assn 01-4435-200-7¢�
Carnrnents
rprs
exp reirnu
splys
sept prern
sept pi^errs
sept prem
sept prern
sept pr^ern
sept prern
sept prern
sept prern
sept prern
state aid
Page 10 ,
Amount
f 4$. 75
i � @�0. Q�k1
S�l. k�0
Ss2t, �+0
21. G8
21.28 . �
2, �C72. 04
1 i 347. 68
2� 868. 44
46�.36
1 i 64Q. 27
954.11 �
i � 5�C6. 92
166. 92
k09. 56
i 1,� 655. 3`'c
39� 5i@. fh0
39� 51@. @Q+
Y-,-�-ts�aa
___�_
r--�----0 1 � 785. 00 �,. �
7otals Temp Check IVumher 69 .
�, Temp Check Number 66
�
bb Metro Wasie Control 15-4449-tB60-60 sept svc 74,352.@0
•� f...
� ' �;��•
'•':',+�, .'r',:�y ., � +�>+f,:�.��} � - :1" • �'{ -•f:2 '- :L.+�..'�� ,;.',5,.'s �,:+:::'...;=� � .'y;r.�v 4a•. , ;:��...., j,��.i1-._ . .2' `. , .. :�!i'i:: _ .n.�r`, l\. ,.. .: �:✓ .. . . . tii
..\ry.;' .•r•"�,•• =:4�:''S'v ..Y. �.i'':'�1'.. ��i �=/.Y.s' — , , . . ' � �.. . .•.!' v w .... , ,.
��<':;.i_r::�\:..,,. i1;�an:..i!r:u=a:-.n., . +F:_ ;.:.f:.::..fy-..ts*5:::i:i',�:��rs'�'�'�;`•'kSa�-w�ca' :r":«�e+ =t .:ii4s%� :`r:`a..+ti.. . . tic�:^�i':a'. .. .
) i Sep ' '
`""� Fri 4 �M
("} Temp Gheck Nurnber 66
Ternp.
;""a Check
� Number Vendar iVarne
•� 66 Metra Waste Contral
' 13z
� Tatals Temp Check Number
Temp Check Numtrer 67
67 Mi»r� �lutual Lifa Ins �
67 Minn Mutua: :.ife Ir�s
67 Minn Mutual Life Ins
6? Minn Mutual Life Iris
. 288
Tatals Ternp Check Numbe�^
,�
Temp Checit iVumber 58,
• 68 Minne�ota Henefit Assn
&S Minnesota Benefit Assn
� 68 Minnesata Etenefi� Assr,
68 Mirmesata Henefit Assn
� 88 Mfnnesot� Benefit Assn
" 68 Minnesota Henefit Assn
68 Minne�oia Henefit Assn
"� 4�6
Tatals 'iemp Gheck Nuinber
�'� Temp Check Nurnber 69
. 69 Minriesota Teamsters Loc s2@
B9
� Tatals 7emp Check Number
Temp Gheck Number 70
"�� 70 Mator Parta Service
7@ Mator Part� Service -
�_j 70 Motor Parts Servfce
.. ?0 Motor� Parts 9ervice ..
70 Motar Farts Service
"�, 70 Motar Parts Service
--- .
4'G7
' Tatals 7ernp Gheck IVumber
Temp Check Number 71
� 71 Nextell Gomm
Glaims �ist
Gity af Mendata He, s
pccaunt Gc,de
i 7-35'75
66
Q+i -�074
471-4i3i-1i�^i0
Q� 1 ��►1 .31 �'Q�2 ��^G�
0�-4i3i-070-70
67
QI 1-2074
Qti-423i-I i?J-IQi
Q�1-4131-02@-�0�
01-�4 i 31-0150-50
Q3-A131-Qt70-7Qt
05-4131-105-iS
1.`�-413i-060-60
68
01-2075
69
01-A3Q�5-070-70
01-4330-43@-50
01-4330-G40-20
37-�►330-479-00
37-4330-479-�0
�1-4330-490-70
@1-433@-k60-30
Camments
sept svc
sept prem
sept prern
sept prern
s�pt prem
sept prem
sept prem
sept prem
sept prem
sepi prem
sept prem
sept prem
sept dues
splys
parts .
part s
parts � �
parts
parts 501
�^prs
P�ge ii
Amaimt
�, 796. 0�+cr
71,556.tB0
cOS. 92
7. 6�+
�5. ,�0
J. I Ql
248.52
JJ�..�J9
38. 81
3?$. 47
k4.52
237. 03
53. 53
45. 51
i s 349. Q6
225. @�
.. 215. 00
c^5p. 44
L�G� �7
10. 1Q
58. 73
6Qt. 1 b
200.64
643.38
40. 00
. �:
;� .v'-`,�,�:ti� � "^:i.�,��: ��'%'��:C. ' ,.�j,�e.�.. `:^i�. ":4'�' :z'w.�: . ::.�w �'. .:'•."..: "%:. 'P ,�. y: ::' esv i• .' ' . . YS'Y•::c'�" .. . .. t . .. .. T: :..�r� :;.:.�,.. .: , .
��.s`. _.. . . _'4=Rz,....:v-_.. �t.w�:.i?.z^.� . _._ �. _.�s$ _ . ..� :'_:S.`���.':..v'�'.`+°.�'�:..'_r�..�'-�x�'��.. �:<��. �.�•;?33.':'.":"'":'�.,"•..""^''.:'�.. .,. ..i��.. ;t,.....-.�'ti'i:i::'c,:;^{'y'F:' •�... '-Hrwr:=n
t
�
�
�
f Sep
Fri 4 �M
iemp Gheek t�E�►snber 71
7emp.
Check
Number Vendar i�ame
71 Nextell Comm
142
Tatals Ternp Check Ivumber
Ternp Gheck i�:umber 72
'72 iVatianal Tr�ca Dii
72 Natiar�al Treca Oil
'72 tiatia�al Tracc� Oil
72 Nataonal 3raco Oii
72 Natianal Traca Oil
�2 National Tracn dil
4a2
'Tatals 'iernp Check Nwsber �
Temp Check Number 73
?3 Narthern State Rower
?3 Northern State Power
y3 Northern State Power
7� Norther» State {"�rnuer
73 Northern Stace Rower
?3 tvorthe�^n State Pawer
'73 Norther» State Power
73 Northern State Forver
?3 Narthern State Power
�3 Northern State Rower
'73 Northern Staie F?ower
?3 Northern Stat� P�ower
876
Totals Temp Check Nunber
iemp Cttec{c Number 74
'74 Norihern St�te F�aver
74 North�rn 9tate Power
74 Norbhern State Rawer
�4 Northern State Poarer
T4 Northern State F'o�ver
37QJ
Temp Check Number 7S
Clairns �ist '
Cit� af Mendota He. s
Accaunt Code
01-433@-460-30
71,
01-43.�0-490-50
�i1-4330-490-7�
15-k33@-4�0-6�b
01-433fD-440-20
01-43�2+-460-30
i5-43a0-490-61D
72
01-4212-3i5-3@
01-42i2-320-70
15-kc�12-k0tD-60
P.�8-423 2-II!@ki-tII03
Q11-4211-3 i 5-30
0i-4c^Ii-a10-50
01-4211-310-70
15-42i1-310-60'
28-k21 i-0Qt0-tLtO
tb 1-kZ 11-300'--50
01-A211-42Q1-5(A
QJ8-421 f -000-fbQl
�
01-k211-320-70
15-42i 1-400-60
01-4212-31@-50
4Ji-421�-310-70
15-4'c.'12-3i0�50
Carnments
rprs
sply5
splys
splys
splys
splys
sply�
sept svc
sept svc
sept svc
sept svc
sept svc
sept �vc
sept svc
sept svc
sept svc
sept svc
sept svc
sept svc
sept svc
sept svc
sept svc
sept svc
sept svc
Page iC
pmG�rr��
�tQ1. t20
80. tIa
i 0�. 35
i �2'ic''. 3.`�i
102. 34
70.i0
7¢+. 1 �
70.08
5;.7. 3�
46. �7
35.25
zs. �s
26.35
i y 0,�r3. 56
235.63
^c35. 53
235. 63 �'
438. k5
4@4.33
4Qt7. 67
2 , 507. Qi2
4, 64i. 45
225. 37
479. 9+d
35. 93
35. 99
�s. �s
_�i i"z _ aL
a
�. �
�, �5 �akcrest Kennels 01-4221-800-9� aug svc 235.0@ �
75 Oakcrest Kennels 01-4285-800-90 aug avc 350.98
•� I50 565.�8 : �
' Tota]s Temp Gheck Nueaher 75 .
:� � ' ��
>r.: s ...� i'� .i� :,;��-.::.�..�'.•. � � •,.;.. , � �,� % ti. 7 ti. ,::r... .�%;C_;,..1> .. .' �:s , .n. •�r:' . K..S�.:�.' ;'£ �:'c.. `• ,..�� ;::..;., v.;C_�• .:'::. . ...
.:•f' x... �.:t:` •:-5. e.c �y::cs�.. . .- �,+r.`:,^.'.tf,, .?':Z : . ......... .. ... , .. _. ..,..... .,. ...
�iPi�'�. _ .._.. ...:� ____...<�:f�'�sf-.:.L'�.:�..':::�... __. _._. . ..- _ .....r�i?i5i�^Ss..,: ..�..-'-��` .. .,_��,._..�:•.... . . .
1 Sep • Giaims �ist Page 13
Fri 4 �M City of �endata He. �
Temp Check NurnGer 76
iemp.
Check
Number Vendor Narne Accaunt Code
'76 qffice Max 01-4300-030-30
i5 Office Max Q+1-4304t-070-70
76 Office Max Q5-4300-1@5-i5
228
7c+tals Tema Check Num�er 76
Temp Chec}t Nurnber 77
'77 Oxygen Servire Ca 03-4s05-030-30
77 Oxynen 8ervic� Ca 08-4335-0�@-a�
�7 Oxygen Service Co Q�1-A3Q�5-030-30
E3i
Tatals Temp Check Number 77
Temp Check Nurnber 78 �
76 Pete Pc�p,�2er & 5a�s 01-45@�-070-70
78
Tc�tals Temp Check Numher 78
Temp Check Number 79
79 principal Mutual @1-2074
79 Principai Mutuai' 0i-4i32-020-20
79 Principal Mutual 01-4132-@50-50
79 Prinezp�l Mutual 4�1-413Z-070-70
316
Totals Ternp Gheck Number 79
Temp Check Number 80
80 Prafessian�tl Turf & Renovatior� ¢�1-4330-2i5--70
80
Ta�tals Temp Check Number 80
Temp Cheek Number 81
82 Ratwik Raszak Hergrtrcm&Malone 01-422k-0�0-50
8f Ratwik Raszait Bergrtrom&iYlalone 01-4224-070-7Qs
81 Ratwik Roszak Her rtram& - 22�0bQ+-62r
Carnrnents
sply�
splys
sply5
axy
act thru 7/si
act thru 7/3i
stump remaval
sept prem
sept prem
sept prem
sept prem
5plys
re pw labar negat
re pw 1�, aborrte_oat—
— re pw labar negc+•t
Arnaunt
39.58
'3. 57
36. 49
8S.64
29. 00
z8.00
13. 50
6Q�. 5@
75. 0@
7S. @0
19i. 27
77. Q6 ' -
2@. �6
' 4k.46
333. @5
3� 706. 20
3� 7Qifi. ^cQ+
1, 567'. 43
�B'T�
1 Y 567. 43
-------- �...,1
.. 243 , 4, 7@�C. 2�
Tatais Temp Check Number 81 '
� Temp Check Number 82 �
.,y 8� R� K Repair @1-4330-460-30 rprs 2282 :5;..89 {":,
� • �,,,
�.`�,;. a. 't�t, e'`'. :a.,. � :�• ..3r<;. r:;s3i�. .t :t�a. .. "i „f� ,.�..;+����:: ., _ _ :.'t.. ae.::�:r.•_:.,k�Yt^'�P`:`=.. i�... . . . -
� .ti �>'i•.; ..$:'. :.<. �.;cr �< .,s:. �2y.�:is�.t;....a 1 . �.... '�4 `%r.. ..,ci.3'%:�.....: .. . . .
•.k• i:?,. b+. �'si° "t' ' . ,eYic'+tc^,wi:�o%G.�.>...t.:.:•-.....r...�.^J' .t• . . �
......�. .. i'�F:'�..._.._ ._...._.�_. , ..- _ . ..`:=i4.x,._ :+::: . _». v.., . .....,.._.. _..�.�...._...r.�a.�F+f�,C:;�.•f:;5-..a-rs�s::>dtia___y ..,._,.
r�
�
1 Sep ' �
Fri ti PM
Temp Check Number 82
i'ernp.
Check
Number Vendor Name
82
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber
Temp Check �urnber 83
83 Brad R�gan Inc
83 Brad �agan inc
83 Rrad R�can Fnc
83 Brad Rag�n Inc
83 Brad R�aan Inc
4I5
Tc�tals Temp Check htumber
Temp Check Nurnber 84
84 Ruff Cut `
84 Ruff Cut .
268
Totals Ternp Check Number
Temp Check Nurnber 85
85 L E Shaughnessy Jr
85 L E Shaughnessy Jr
85 L E Shaughriessy 7r
85 L E Shaughnessy Jr
85 L E Shaughnessy Jr
85 L E Shaughnessy Jr
85 L E Shaughr�essy Jr
5�5
Totals Temp Check Number
Temp Check Number 86
86 Southview Design
86
Totals Temp Check Number
Temp Check Number 87
Ciairns List
City of renciata He
Accaunt Cade
82
@1-4330-4'3�-70
01-433@-46V7-30
�1-433�-460-3v�
�? i -=e330-490-70
0i-4330-430-7�
Ss
OJI-4490-04@-4@
01-4490-04@-40
84
01-4220-1s2-10
05-4220-132-15
15-4220-132-6@'
21-4220-132-@0
03-4220-132-00
29-422@-132-00
16-4220-13Z-00
85
16-4460-842-00
ss
s
Cornments
tires
tires
c�sing
t ir•s SZ�i
c�sing
weed cut
weed cut
�ug svc
aug svc
aug svc
aug svc
aug svc
aug svc
aug avc
rprs
Page 14
Arnount
16i. 8�
351. A0
55 i . 66
85.0�cr
344. 0�
75.00cr
i! �187. 13
4@. @0 �
4a.00
8Q.@0
1, 652. 65
17i. 30
251. 95 '
191. 45
211. 65
85, 65
2, 473. 95
S, 038. 6Q�
84@. 00
84@. 0@
87 Southview Chev - 330�� rprs z�3•99
' 87 203.99 �."�
Tatals Temp Check Number 87 �
� Temp Check Number 86 �
.r 88 5tate f'�tutual Ins 01-�ID74 sept prem 143. il i 1
� , . ��:
f ..�[: 4 ! �J,h +a:`. ' :ly�ty>'/.: .' S ' ;:4 •. \:�'•:.' .`?c+^��u. . ✓t � .' �. d . � �� .... _.. ?,� .� �"� . . .. i. ... .. . .�.
+ !�-riii +.. .iJ. ..:r.. a+n.,d{-� ..�`: ::}�:,i:+rt:i�+',c�"i ,r=...--w-"""'�y:> '.. \" . . �. : .
..._....__...._ . '=,�Yu:._.... _ .._. �?f{..._... ._..._.. ..... .•y.x.+'_.-.f�G:<n...:::Z.,.w.aX�...�:__.. �, .z - _..:riY:• rF.6Q �,d _ �.,..'i+l:+.a.^.�...,.�...a+t.r.�.. :.�.+..+;::"�.=+�F�:. �"'.�.:�: �:t�'•'•::•�� .•;t�.. .�y..?';,C�i .r+�
y i Sep
" Fr i 4 yM
r� Temp Gheck Nurnber 88
Temp.
; � •, Check
Nurnber Vendor Name
. $8 St�te Mutual ins
176
?� Tata2s 7emp Check Number
i'ernp Check :�:urotrer 89
89 Fatrick Sweeney
69
Tatals Temp Ghecic hi�zrober
Temp Check Number �0
90 Traphy Hause
90 7raphy House �
160
Tatals Ternp Check i3umber
Temp Check Number 91
9i Turf 8upply Ca
91 Turf Supply Ca
182
Tat�ls Temp Check Nuimber
Temp Check Number 92
.. 92 T M I Coatings Znc
58
� 7o�als 7ernp Gheck Number
Temp Check iV�mher 93
'� 93 U S West Carnmunications
93 U 8 tJest Communicatiaris
� 93 U 5 West Carnmunications
"` 93 U S West Cammunications
93 U S WQst Cammuttira�ions
93 U S West Cammunicatians
"' 93 t3 S West Cammunicat ians
9a u s w�st c4 �-��
7A4
Totals Temp Check lVumber
� Temp Check hlumbe�^ 94
� 9k iJniforms Unlimited
{ , ., . n .r-y�-
.-�c.^ .^?r � .. < 'C .,+fir..r; ^
'r:��:='r?'.a�a4"�r.':'��x^se� i`... �:�:�.���' : ^z,.....>:�-.�``.�"�'ie��:._..
Claims l�ist �
City af Mendota Nex_ �
pccaunt Code
0 i -4 i 31-0�'�..Q+-20
8$
0i-325Q
$9
01-4435-200-74�
01-4435-200-70
90
Qti-4330-8i5-70
01-442�-@50-50
91
37-433Q-A73-Q�0
s�
PJS-H21fD-110-10
¢t 1-42I fd-0�c0-2Q+
@ 1-A210-04Q1-4P�
QS-421fL-IO5-15
k 5-A�c I tA-0o0-6�J
01-4Z10-050-50
@ i -k�C 10-4J7¢�--70
i - a ro@
sa
01-4410-02P,-20
Comrner�ts
sept prerrt
rfd perrnit fee
recr soiy5
recr splys
spiys
splys
�^e w�ter- tawer
aug svc
aug svc -
aug svc
aug svc '
aug svc
aug svc
aLi-g-svc---"�"—
aug svc
sply5
Page 15
Arnaurit
i � 1 @0. 95
1 y 244. tD6
12d. 93
i 20. 93
i90. ZI
305. 88
496. m9
167. 89
3i6.03
483. 92
3s 3i5.49
3a 315. 49
324. 8�
48b.?1
59. 5�
177. S2
438.32
3q. f-��
145. @1
i37.75
1�80�.23
21. ft�3
' � :
t 1 5ep ,
' � Fri 4, �M
"} Temp Check Number '34
Temp. '
} Check
Number Vendar �iarne
'�t 94 EJniforms Cln2 imited
94 Uniforms Ur�lirnited
94 Uniforms Urilimited
;� 94 Unifarms t3nlimited
94 Uniforms Unlirnited
�64
Taiai� Temo Check Number
� Temp Check �lusaher 35
95 Ur�iver�al Life
'y 95 Univer�al Life
� 95 Universal Lzfe
95 Universal �ife
';� 95 Univer�ai Life �
" '95 i3niversai Life
� 95 Univer�al Life
..� ---
.. 658
Totais Temp Check Nurnber
"} Temp Check Number 96
� 96 U S West Cellul�r
95 U S L�est Celluier
96 U S Wesi Cellulai^
'] . ^c88
'iotal� Ternp Check Number
..y
" Temp Check 3Vurnber 97
� 97 United Way 8C Paul
97
Total� Temp Check Number
Temp Check Etitutnber 38
"' 98 Zep Mfg
98 Zep i+'Ifg
. 98 Zep Mfg
"rc94 Is4.73
o a s Temp Check Number 3B ��_)
� 13963 204�320.69 �
�raMd Tata2 �
t `.. �
� . �...
.:t �. ' 'x:�,. � '�:.�. '"Ac. fi��:y�. :'r''`:''• :�•v :ti.,�:.'ifiti.:]_z�;�;:-'M^ .'.XJ"2' ^+:!�.',.`:-sa.'_ ;G �� e�,V�.::v�. - � ; �
s+.. '�:: '.i> - i.. ;+# :aF-. r.... c.. ,::x:..�.:.r. '.:;.-,�: a:,..,+<.;'sh r - .:a-�i. .,x.,:.., - 1
,�/3 -.n.�c•� .� . �t. _i:z,x. `.:--.ti'h':.�. :t��=.'•>:..: ' . . ... .. . �
d. ..j::{ . v'• ::�i=:...:.. ;F"%:c`•z.nt_.�.c;...{�����•- - • <•- e'
':c� :ar. .�,.t ^e 'c3'' ..+5.'�-�r., n-:. -:r;:;i:rf^:`•:• .. . _... �.� .. 4 ..... ...,�,n..
�:.. `t;.�^; f ,,,},{: � .:? : `,:�: :ky..� r7,rs �� _ :,.!3e"' i .....+� ,-`:.' w . c:�..Cy� �. .. .. . .. ... . .. .. .. . . . . . . � . . �
�'!�:...? �.. :.�''.;,_�'��:3;.....lni?,:.. .�!'.�. ::�.. . ..;S:vw„a.`�:�'�:i � .;,,�}:.::%��_:......�'.-=:.=:-'^^��+.ti-:.., . . �,+�1 . .. . .
Clairns List '
City of Mer�dot� He. �
Accaunt Cc�de
@1-44i0-��rd-20
01--4410-@2@-�E
01-4410-02�2-20
tZa i -44 i Q�-�Qy2@-,2Qi
01-44i0-020-^u�'0
94
0 i-4 i 3 i-02Qt-2�
P� 1-413 f -4150-5@
Q i. -4131-E70-70
01-4i3i-120-I0
05^-4 i 31-i 05^ 15
i5-4i31-060-6�8
Q� i -413i -04@-40
95
@ i -4� 10-02@-^ctcl
�D2-42fQt-f i0-1@
01-4210-@30-30
96
mz-20��
97
15-4305-064+-Es0
Qti-4305-@50--80
01-43Q�5-070-70
Commerrts
sp2ys
splys
splys _
splys
splys
se�at prern
sept prem
sept prern
sept prern
sept prem
sept prem
sep�� prem
,�ul svc
1u2 svc
�ul svc
�ul aug 5ept contr
splys �
splys
splys
i�age i6
Amc�ti�nt
i93. G,Q
9. 8c
k4. 95
c65. 43
2i.57
,�.i55. 80
3�8. i�i
2+7t i.33
234.49
154.86
248,2u
123. 30
312. 0�1
1, 6��. 39
348. 2v�
8. 2tIl
15. 2�
37i.62
435. 4�
435. 45
�+4. 91
44.9i
44.91
,���,
�
.
1543, 1702,20 State Mutuai
15435 232.50 John Neska .
15436-44i 13i3.OJ Recreaticn refunds
i5�42-443 102.D0 umpires�
15444-447 9,237,48 ivy FaT1s easemenfis
25448 54.�0 Dekota CtY iiwY Dept
15449 175.00 Fire "cMS Center
1545Q . 40.00' Minn Goui.ty Attny
154b1 1�O.JQ tdinn Cha�:ter TAAI �
15432 4;250.�Q0 State Ca�+itoi C U
1545A ;i929,77 Savanna Lesign
I5455 13.84 PERA
15456 9,079.43 "
I5457 1,051..36 ICMA
I5�58 1,0�5.00 Minn I•wtual'
15459 225.0� Great West L& A
15460 170.00 �tinn State Ret9rement
1546i 266.4.. Dakota County�
1�¢�� � 585.00 �Dakota Bank
i5463 . 4,626.7& Conmqs5ianer Revenue
15464 29,559.58 Dakota Bank
15465 55,777.27 PayroTi ajc
1546b �97.27 Oennis �elmont
��¢�7 300•00 Dakota County
15468-478 �4.00 unpfi Ces •
15479 � 143.00 Krtox Co ••
i5�81 �40.00 r�iPCA " .
l��z 150•0+1 Minn Dept heaith
15�83 's8.45 Kim 8laeser
15484 SQ.GO ist ptace softba�li
i54b5 25.07 2nd pTace softball
15486 45.04 aona Cnrrie
113,551.94
�.T. 317,872.63
ins ddj
exp reimb
permit fee
regr
regr
regr
t3jltt payroTl
park improvement
$!28 pay,ail
„
„
��
��
��
M
��
��
exp reimb
warrant
fd splys
insp fee
�fd pet�ttiit fee
exp reimb
► ..
C``
r-
a
''}
'-1
�•�
!��}
�; l
_:�
�.J
�
�
�
�'�
{"}
J �
�j
k � ..
, - ;f: , ��t;::,;.��. :;.� _�,:;w�, . .
. .. � .... h; :r;:-" .SJ,i.•4 .•:`�s.;. . �..:'
:i'..i ti.ti.V' Sa, 'c:%=.,;. <;..
.rrk'�'- ..G..:.�:o-•�.%,-e'.—.-�:t•%' ••v:::+,::y . .<.,;�-:: „�
_ __ _- - _— � ::;r:i::Y':"r'i��i;�v:titi>>':.�?..�.. "',�r• f.o^s3;t}.u*`;.r7iJ::,� it�.",'i:�es�.':. •:^,!i�..�:C\::. F - *'ti",e..�• _
.........-..n..�..4..�,•.�..-. v.....�..,�+.��»+`s,•.e.�+.-e.�t .n.,. •�»�:en. ;:.5 .-r--,....r:r....-1—,`�•�'�---.,.a.....-u....:,� . ....,.... _.....;.+�.:: ... ....:..7.t.:i......s..�:.:....___.:.... . - ' --_ "_
�
�
�
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �
MEMO
September 1,;1995
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis rat
SUBJECT: Presentation on 1996 NDC4 Budget and Cable T
Renewal Request
DISCUSSION
At our meeting held on August 15, 1995, Council was �
packet of information from the Northern Dakota County Cable
Commission (NDC4). This packet contained information on th
budget and a pending request by Continental Cablevision to e:
their cable television franchise.
ision
1996
�d the
a
ms
of
On September 5, 1995 representatives from NDC4 will be presentlto
present this information to the City Council, and to ask for approval of t e
submitted 1996 budget document. Guests expected at the meeting incl de NDC4
Executive Director Jodie Miller, and NDC4 Community Representative Mi e Sokol.
Due to the length of the previously submitted material, a
the NDC4 budget and supporting documents have not been m�
and bring to our upcoming meeting your copy of the memo fro
you are unable to locate the material, please call Kim to let her
replacement packet will be made for you.
ACTION REQUIRED
litional opies of
;. Plea e locate
August 15th. If
�ow, an a
Council should discuss,with those NDC4 representatives 'present their 1996
draft budget, and should consider a motion granting formal approval. In addition,
Council should discuss with NDC4 Continental's request to extend their able
television franchise agreement. �
4� f�
♦
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis
FROM: Marc S. Mogan, P.E., Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Assessment Hearing
Friendly Hills & Surroundi.ng Areas
7ob No. 9221
Improvement No. 92, Project No. 6
DISCUSSION:
The Friendly Hills street reconstruction project currently is not
anticipate its completion yet this fall. This is a very large and costly i
due to the considerable interest e�ense which would accrue on this pi
that the City certify the assessment roll this year rather than delay it w
The ro rties that abut Hazel Court received a bitu� ous o�
P P�
assessment is $800. The iemaining majority of the lots have an ass
There have been a few properties that have requested extra work fro
assessments for these properties have been increased accordingly, d
Donald & Beverly Nechadom
710 Ocala Lane
Extra Bituminous Drive Work
Thomas & Loretta Connelly
2296 Apache Street
Extra Concrete Drive Work
Nadia Hennessy
2167 Fox Place
P�ctra Storm Water Work
7ames Helluig
749 Cheyenne Lane
Extra Sod
$2750.
1.1
��T�
� John & Lynne Maczko $2790.00
751 Cheyenne I.ane
Extra Sod
1, 1995
completed, but we
�ement project, and
staff recommends ,
next year.
erla.y only, and their
sment of $2,700 per lc
the Contractor. The
are as listed below: ,
One last property of special note is the John and Michelle Edward's's parcel at the
southeast corner of Dodd Road and Decorah Lane at 2270 Dodd Road. Dodd Road abuts the
entire frontage of this parcel and consequently no concrete curb and gutter or street
improvements were constructed across the frontage of this parcel. The Edwazd's did not
oppose consttuction of the bituminous pathway along Decorah Lane between Dodd Road and
Apache, and in fact were very accommadating by granting the City a slope easement over their
property at no cost.
At the feasibility public hearing Council agreed that only those parcels which received
curb and gutter and reconshucted streets would be assessed a proportionate share of the
improvement costs.
Based on the above circumstances, this property will not be assessed any cost of these
improvements. While this property does not meet the assessment criteria. which was
established for this project initially, I believe that the property benefits aesthetically from this
project because of its close proximity. I would recommend that Council consider stipulating
that should the propefiy ever be split or subdivided in the future, that a condition of that
appmvai by the City would be that all of the resultant properties of such aa action pay a
connection charge of $2,7(}0 per 1ot.
RECONIlVIENDATION:
5taff recommends that Council adopt and confirm the assessment roll as submitted.
Conduct the public hearing. If Council concurs with the recommendation they should
a motion adopting Resolution No. 95- ,RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND
TFIltn�IING ASSESSMII�ITS FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION/REHABILITATION
ROVIIVIENTS TO SERVE FRIIIVDLY HILLS. REARRANGIIVIENT,
�ELBURGER ADDITION, SIlVIEg REARRANGIIVIENT, AND SURROUNDING
`AS (IlVIPROVIIVIENT NO. 92, PROJECT NO.�
/
ti-`
e� 'r
City of Mendota. Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRn�IING ASSESSMENTS
FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION/REHABILITATION IMPRO �`T.MENTS T�
FRIENDLY HILLS REARRANGEMENT, HASELBURGER �ADDITI(
SIlVIEK REARRANGIIVIENT, AND SURROUNDING AREAS
(IlVIPROVEMENT NO. 92, PROJECT NO.�
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights as
WHF.REAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the Ci En '�eer has c
the ro r amount to be � �' �
p pe specially assessed for the costs incurred to date with respec
Improvement No.92, Project No.6 conshuction of Street Reconst�uction/Rehabilita
improvements to serve the following described property situated in the City of Men
Heights, Dakota. County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows:
All parcels located in Friendly Hills Re-airangement except parcel � 27-2780
and 27-27800-190-05, Haselburger Addition, Simek Rearrangement and Pa�
27-02500-020-52; 27-025(}0-021-52; 27-02500-030-52; 27-02600-012-77; 2
010-26; 27-036(}0-020-26; 27-036Q0-030-26; 27-03600-010-27; 27-48225-0
27-48225-020-00. �
WHEREAS, the progosed assessment roll has been on file with the Clerk
times since its filing has been open for public inspection; and notice thereof has bi
published and mailed as required by law. Said notice stated the date, time� and pla
meeting; the general nature of the improvement; the area proposed to be assessed;
proposed assessment roll has been on file with the Clerk; and that written or oral �
thereto by any property owner would be considered; and �
WHEREAS, said hearing was held at 7:45 o'clock P.M. or as soon as F
thereafter, on Tuesday, September 5, 1995, at City Hall in the City of Mendota
Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor announced that the hearing was open for the co�
objections, if any, to said proposed assessments; and �
WHEREAS, all persons present were then given an opportunity to present o:
objections, and all written objections theretofore filed with the Clerk were presented
considered. , I
NOW THEREFORE, this Council, having heard and considered all objectic
presented, and being fully advised in the premises, and having made all necessary ac
SERVE
to
0-02
No.
and
latall
duly
of such
�t the
so
of
and corrections, fmds that each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the
proposed assessment roll was and is specially benefited by the construction of said
improvements in not less than the amount of the assessment, as corrected, set opposite the
description of each such lot, piece and parcel of land, respectively, and that such amount so set
: out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein des-
cribed; and
BE IT FiJRTHER RESOLVED, that the proposed assessment roll when adopted and
confumed as to the proper special assessment for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land
respectively, and the assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of seven
percent (7 %) per annum accruing on the full amount thereof from time to time unpaid, shall be
a lien concurrent with general taxes upon such parcel and all thereof. The total amount of
each assessment as to street reconstruction/rehabilitation improvements shall be payable in
equal amounts extending over a period of nineteen (19) years; the first of said installments,
together with interest on the entire assessment commencing thirty (30) days from the date of
the official letter of assessment to December 31, 1995, to be payable with general taxes for the
year 1995, collectible in 1996, one of each of the remaining installments, together with one
year's interest on that and all other unpaid installments, to be payable with general taxes for
each consecutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid.
BE IT FLTRTHER RESOLVED, that prior to October 6, 1995 the owner of any 1ot,
piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may at aay time pay the whole. of such assessment,
without interest to the City Treasurer; and
BE IT FiJRTHIIt RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall prepare and transmit to the
County Auditor a certified duplicate of said assessment roll with each�then unpaid installment
and interest set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County, and
the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessments in the manner provided by law.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this Sth day of September, 1995.
CITY COUNCIL
CTTY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTFST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
y� �- .
s
ASSESSMENT PERIOD
Stree# Reconstxuction - 19 years
1NTERFST RATE -1 %
-03600-
-03600-
0 27
Patricia K.' Lovegreen
2294 Dodd Raad
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
ames Baker IIT
2300 Pgel Road
Mendota I3eights, MN 5512Q
Robert P. & SuTanne Fischer
2390 Pagel Raad
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Albert & June Peterson
7S9 Creek Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Emilie M. Burow
765 Creek Avenue �
Mandata �IeighEs, MN 55120
CITY OF MENDOTA SEIGHTS .
AS5ESSMENT ROLL
FRIENDLY HII.LS & S�;�RR4tiiNDIl�iG A,REAS
REHABTLITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
�QB NQ. 9Z21i IlV1P. 92-6 .
ADOPTED: '
���1; t �+I��Cf��)
202ftofW433ftofS1568.2ftofS � 2 � 26
68.2 fi of 5 135 acres of NW 1/4
202 ft of W 433 ft of S i366.2 ft of S 3 26
966.2 ft of S 135 acres of NW 1/4 ex
ta hwy
r 248.92 fi of N 175 ft of S 205 ft of 1 27 -
?AS ft af S 135 A of NW 1J4 Ex W 33
to vill
Friendly Hills Rearrangemeut 1 1
Friendiy Hills Rearrangement 2 1
G
ASSESSMENT RATES:
Street Reconstnzctian - $2,700 per Iot �
(Street Rehabilitation/Reconstsuction Fund - 50 �,)
$2,700.00
��y7�,�}Q
$2,700.OQ
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
, tt ft
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,70Q.00
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. RECONST.
27-27800- Arnold T. & Judith Hanzal Friendly Hills Rearrangement 3 1 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
030-01 771 Creek Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 '
27-27800- Randal & Debra Swenson Friendly Hills Rearrangement 4 1 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
040-01 775 Creek Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Robert & Martha Swenson Friendly Hills Rearrangement 5 1 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
050-01 779 Creek Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
r
27-27800- David & Jan Dreelan Friendly Hills Rearrangement 6 1 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
050-01 785 Creek Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- John Jr. & Evelyne Thorpe Friendly Hills Rearrangement 7 � 1 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
070-01 791 Creek Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Earl & Iona Weinberg Friendly Hills Rearrangement 8 1 $2,700.00 $2,700,00
080-01 795 Creek Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Alma Fischer Friendly Hills Rearrangement 2 2 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
020-02 796 Creek Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Lois M. Johnson Friendly Hills Rearrangement 3 2 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
030-02 790 Creek Avenue "
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Amy Powell & Carlos Puigsanchez Friendly Hills Rearrangement 4 2 $2,700.00 $2,700,00
040-02 784 Creek Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
PARCEL
�i� i7
-2780Q= Gail �I. & Klytia M. Wirth
0-02 2123 Fox Plac�
Mendota' Heights, MN 55120
-278Q0- osemarie M. Bisciglia
0-02 2129 Fox Placa
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
-278Q0- Patricia A. Adolph
Q-02 2135 Fox PZac�
Mendata Heights, MN 55120
27800- Geo. F. & Lucille S. Wojnar
0-03 2145 Fax Place
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27800- Beth Y. Henry
0-03 2153 Pox Place
Meudota Heigh#s, MN 55I2Q
-27$QO- Dennis E. & Judy A. McCardle
0-03 2259 Fox Placc
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
-27800- Frances Rose Franzen
0-03 1b5 Fox Placa
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
-278p0- Nadia Chriskine Hennessy
0-03 2167 Fax Place ,
Mendata I�eights, MN 551?A
-27800- erese Chao
0-03 783 Hokah A�venue
Mendota Heights, MN 5512A
r
Q��
Hills Rearrange�nt ;
Friendly Hilis Rearrangement 6 2
Friendly Hills Rearrangenaent '7 2
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 1 3
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 2 3
Friendly Hills Rear�rangement 3 3
Frriendly Hills Rearrangement 4 3
Friendlp Hills Rearrangement 5 3
Friendly Hills Reanangement 6 3
ft t'+ +Tt�
$2,700.00
$2,704.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
�p�i7�.�
$2,700.00
$3,270.00
$2,70Q.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,7Q0.00
$2,700.00
$3,270.00
$2,700.00
PARCEL REP�fTED OVVI�TER AND SUBDT'�I�fiION LOT BLK STREET TUTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION. NO. N4. RECONST.
27 27800- Morris Frie��na,a Fitendly Ffills Rearrangement : 7 3 $2,700.00 $2,704.00
070-03 '189 Hokah Aven�e '
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 .
27-2780Q- Thomas G. & Julianne Toth Friendly Hills Rearcangement 8 3 $2,700.00 $2,7Q0.00
080-03 '795 Hokah Avenue
Mendota, Heights, MN 55120
27-2780fJ- Craig D. & Nan A. J'aeger Friendly Hills Rearrangement 1 4 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
OlQ-04 21i9 A,ztec Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 5512A . �
2�-278t30- Mary Ann Frowick Friendly Hills Rearrangement 2 4 $2,700.QQ $2,704.00
020-04 �66 Creek Avenue
Mendata F%ights, MN 55120
27-27800- uth E. Gaodriah Friendly Hills Rearrangement 3 4 $2,700.00 $2,70Q.40
030-04 '772 Creek Avenue
Menc3ota fIeights, MN 551?A
27-27800- Conrad & Rosemaiy Olson Friendly Hills Reanangement 4 4 $2,700.W $2,700.OQ
040-04 2116 Fax P2ace
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
2'1-2780Q- Robert & Ruth Ann Linc Frtendly Hills Rearrangement 5 4 $2,700.W $2,700.00
OSQ-04 2124 Fax Place
Mendoka Heights, MN 5512Q
27-27800- Micael G. & Deborab. Evenson Friendly Hilis Rearrangement 6 4 $2,700.Q0 $2,700.00
060-04 1572 Boazdwalk Court
Mendata �Ieights, MN 55120 �
27 278IX}- ohn & Dorothy Engh Friendly Hills Rearrtingement 7 4 $2,700.IX} $2,700.00
070-04 2136 Fox Place
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 .
�
�
AND SUBDIVLSIUN LpT BL
NO. N(
27 278QQ- Jess S. & Doro#hy D. Larsen Friendly I�il1s Rearrangement . 8 4
Q80-04 2142 Fox Place '
Mandata Heights, MN 55124 .
27-27$00- Raymond A. & Caxol A. J'ubera Friendly Hills Rearrangemeut 9 4
090-04 2150 Fox P?�ace
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-278Q0- Bradley & Pataricia Herbert Friendly Hi11s Rearr�ngement 10 4
100-04 2158 Fox Placa
Mendata Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Andrea Arndt Friendly Hills Rearrangemant 11 4
110-04 2163 Aztec Lane
Mendota FIeights, MN 551?A
27 27800- anet M. Connolly Frieudly Hills Rearraugemeni 12 4
120-04 2153 Aztec Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 551?A
27-27800- Don & Glenyce Harrington Friendly Hills Rearrangement 13 4
230-04 2147 Aztec L�aa�
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Bette Oberg Friendly Hills Rearranngement 14 4
140-04 ZI43 Aztec Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800= Lucille K. Hansen Friendlq Hills Rearcangement 15 4
150-04 2137 Aztec Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 �
�=�7-868-- - nnts .. a ewxcz Friendly �Iills Rearr�ngement I6 4
160-04 2131 Aztec La�ne
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
ft tt
$2,70U.00
�2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,7W.00
$2,700.00
t� �f
$2,�W.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00 $2,70Q.00
$2,700,00 $2,70Q.00
$2,700.00 $2,700.00
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER:AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION• NO. NO. RECONST.
27-27800- ohn & Lucille S�kalo Friendly Hills Rearrangement . 17 4 �2,700.00 $2,700.00
170-04 2125 Aztec Laae '
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Kenneth & Bernice Radke � Friendly Hills Rearrangement 1 5 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
010-05 210b Aztec Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Michael J. Engel & Jennifer J. Tschida Friendly Hills Rearrangement 2 5 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
020-05 2112 Aztec Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 .
27-27800- Donald L. & 7oanne K. Wilke Friendly Hills Reanangement 3 5 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
030-05 2118 Aztec Lane '
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- A.J. & Ruth Fisher Hipp Friendly Hills Rearrangement 4 5 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
040-05 2124 Aztec Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- LeRoy C. & Deanna C. Stuber Friendly Hills Rearraugement 5 5 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
050-05 2130 Aztec Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Harry Fredkove Friendly Hills Reanangement 6 5 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
050-05 2138 Aztec Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Timothy Cutting Friendly Hills Reanangement 7 5 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
070-05 2144 Aztec Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Darrell L. & Sue A. 'hitewohl Friendly Hills Rearrangement 8 5 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
080-05 2150 Aztec Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION.' NO. NO. RECONS"r.
27-27800- ussell D. & 7anice Johnson Friendly Hills Rearrangenaent 9 5 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
090-05 2156 Aztec Lane � '
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 •
27-27800- Virgina L. Elmer Friendly Hills Rearraugement 10 5 $2,700.00 $2,700•00
100-05 2162 Aztec Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Timurie R. & Kristen A. McCullough Friendly Hills Rearrangement 11 5 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
110-05 2168 Aztec I.ane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 •
27-27800- Bonnie A. Anderson Friendly Hills Rearraugement 12 5 $2,700•00 $2,700•00
120-05 2174 Aztec Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Frederick W. & Kay Lambrecht Friendly Hills Rearrangement 13 5 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
130-05 2182 Aztec lana
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
2?-27800- Steven B. & Jeanelle Shimek Friendly Hills Rearrangement 14 5 $2,700.00 $2,700•00
140-05 2188 Aztec Lana
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Eugene & Mazlene Schiff Friendly Hills Reanangement 15 5 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
150-05 196 Aztec Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- – omas Weinzettel Friendly Hills Rearrangement 16 5 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
160-05 202 Aztec Lane
endota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800— nen y s earrangement 17 5 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
170-05 2204 Aztec Lan�
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
-27800- Cari 3. & Gretchen Becherer
0-05 2197 Aztec Lane
Mendata�Heights, MN 5522A
-27800- Mary Christixt� Grant
0-05 '796 Hakah Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
'-278W- R,audy L. & Jean A. Lenoch
A-05 'T88 I�ok.ah Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 5512q
i-27800- Steven 7. & Christa Crangl
10-07 2201 Apache Street
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
►-27800- E. Gleisner & Joyce Johnson
40-07 2209 Apache Street
Mendota Heights, MN 5512U
1-278W- Pearl E. Mortensen
i0-0� 22i3 Apache Street
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
1-2780Q- Vet Administration
50-07 Fort Snelting
Federal Buildi.ng
St. Paul, MN 53711
7-27$00- obert C. La�ng
70-0? 2225 Apache Street
Mendata Heights, MN 55120
7-278Q0- Steven A. & Gail P. Krey
3Q-07 2231 Apache Street
Mendota. HeiQhts. MN 55120
s��sDr+►�s�oN LOT BL
NO. NC
Friendiy I3ilis Rearra7ngement ; I8 5
rn
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 21 5
Lat ZO & W�,st 1/2 of Lot 21
Friendly Hills Rearraugement 22 S
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 3 5
Friendly I3ills Rearrangement 4 5
Friendly Hills RearrRngement 5 S
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 6 7
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 7 7
Frriendly Hills Rearrangement 8 7
$2,700.fl0
$2,700.W
�2,700.Q0
$2,700.00
$2,700.W
$2,700.Q0
$2,700.W
$2,7Q0.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.C10
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,70Q.00
$2,700.OtI
$2,'T00.{}0
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND � SUBDIVISION LOT SLK STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTI011T NU. NO. RECONST.
27-27800- Michael G. & Lisa G. Coonan Friendly Hills Rear�rangement 9 '1 $2,700.00 �2,7170.00
09Q-0? 2237 Apache Sireet .
Mendota Hoights, MN 55120 ` •
27 27800- William G. & Judith Krogmann Friendly Hills Rearrangement 10 '7 $2,700,00 $2,700.00
100-0� 2243 Apacha Street
Ivlendota Heights, MN SS12t}
27-27800- Connie A. Johnson Friendly Hills Rearrangement 1 i 1 $2,�00.40 �2,700.00
110-07 2?s�9 Apache Street
Mendata Heights, MN 551Q
27-27800- Richard P. & Maryann Za�tn Friendly Hills Rearra7agem�nt 1 9 $2,?OQ.04 �2,7QQ.00
010-09 719 Cheyenne Lane '
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Williazn J. Stieger F'riendly Hills Rearrangement 2 9 $2,70p.00 $2,700.00
0?A-09 723 Clzeyenne Laucs
Mendata Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Gregg J. & Apri1 Palski Friendly Hills Rearrangement 3 9 $2,70Q.00 $2,7Q0.00
030-09 729 Cheyenne Lanc
Mendota Heights, MN 5512{}
27 2780Q- Brnce Goodwin Friendly Hilts Rearrangement 4 9 $2,700.00 $2,704.00
040-09 733 Ch�yenno Lana
Mendota I�eights, MN 55120 �
27-27800- �,laine M. Kirchner Friendly Hills Rearrangement _ S _ _ 9_ _ — $2,?OQ.00 -- — - $2,10Q.Q0 —
p50-09 --- 737 Cheyenua Lane - .
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- David W. & Dianne K. Witllcie Friendly Hills Rearrangement 6 4 ---$�2�0A:
;
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION . LOT BLK ST T TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. • RECONST.
27-27800- David & Marilyn Garwood Friendly Hills Rearraugement 7 9 �2,700.00 $2,700.00
070-09 743 Cheyenne L,ane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 '
27-27800- ohn G. & L.ouise Dorsch Friendly Hills Rearrangement 8 9 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
080-09 745 Cheyenne Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 5510
27-27800- ames K Helling Friendly Hills Rearrangement 9 9 $2,750.00 $2,750.00
090-09 749 Cheyenne Lane
Mendota Heights, MN
27-27800- oha P. & Lynne Maczko Friendly Hills Rearrangement 10 9 �2,790.00 $2,790.00
100-09 751 Cheycnne Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Kacper & Halina Ambroziak Friendly Hills Rearrangement 11 9 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
110-09 2212 Apache Stre�t
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 ,
27-27800- Brian & I{aren Bird Friendly Hills Rearrangement 12 9 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
120-09 2206 Apache Street
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Clara Marie Podd Friendly Hills Rearrangement 13 9 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
130-09 2200 Apacho Street
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Dave A. Nygaard Friendly Hills Rearrangement 1 10 • $2,700.00 $2,700.00
010-10 724 Cheyenne Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Douglas C.& Mary J. Johnston Friendly Hills Rearrangcment 2 10 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
020-10 728 Cheyenne Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 '
Q-10 400 Marie Avenue '
West St. Pau1, MN 5511$
-27800- erome & Mary Ann Vashro
0-10 736 Cheyenne Lana
Mendota �Ieigh#s, MN SS120
Z78QQ- Caro2 3. Grewing
0-10 740 Cheyenno Lane
Mendota Hcights, MN 5512Q
-278q0- oseph & Luatm Wittrock
0-10 742 Gheyenna Lane
Mendata Heights, MN 55120
-27$C10- Williaxu E. Jr. & Mary Chisler
U-14 746 Gheycnne Lans
Mendota Heights, MN 551?A
-27800- Larry D.� & Miriam �ieinert
0-lp 748 Cheyenne Lana
Mendota Flaights, MN 55120
-2780Q- Margaret A. Vaccaro
0-1Q 752 Chtyenna Lana
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
-27800- Chazles & Elizabeth Lysdahl
0-10 � 2222 �Apacha Street
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
-278Q0- ohn M. & Dana M. Reed
�} �g
Mendata Heights, MN 55120
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 4 IO
Friendiy �Eills Rearraugement 5 20
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 5 10
Friendly Hills Rearrangement '7 10
Friendly Hills Reart�ngem:en.t 8 IO
Frieudly F�il�s Rearrangement 9 10
Friendly_Hills Rearrangem�ent _ 1Q_ _ 10 _
Friendly Hills Rearx�ngement 11 10
700.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,704.00
�2,700.00
�z,�aa.00
�2,700.00
7W.00
$2,7()0.00
$2,100.00
�z,�ai.Qo
�2,7(10.00
�Z,�ao.00
$2,700.00
�t it �� �i
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIYISION . LOT BLK STREET TOTAL
N4. DESCRIPTIO � NU. NfJ. RECONST.
27-27800- Thomas H. & Louise Lentz Friendly Hills Rearrangement 12 10 �2,700.00 $2,700.00
120-10 2236 Apache Street
Mendota Heights, MN 5517A '
27-27800- effrey D. Stenhaug Friendly Hills Rearrangement I3 10 $2,700.00 $2,70p.00
130-10 2242 Apache Street
Mendata I�eights, NIN 5522A
27 27800- Darlene V. Melquist Friendly FEills Reanangement 14 10 �2,700.00 $2,700.00
140-10 2250 Apache Street
Mendota Heigh#s, MN 55120
27-278IX1- David & Lois Trstee Holvarson Friendly Hills Rearraugement 1S 10 $2,700.W $2:700.00 .
150-i0 '7'793 Inskip Trail Sonth
Gottage Grova, MN 55016
27-278W- Darrell B. & Lois J. Kelsey Friendly Hills Rearrangement 16 10 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
16Q-14 753 Decarah Lan�
Mondota Heights, MN 5517A
2'7-278W- Lars T. & C�nnlhia Hesbjerg Friendly Iiills Rearrangement I� 10 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
170-10 749 Deco�rah Lane
Mendota FIaights, MN 55120
27-27840- ean B. Baregi Friendiy Hilis Reanangement i8 1Q $2,700.00 $2,70p.00
180-10 �47 Decorah Lane
Mendata Heights, MN 5512A
27-278Q0- Sally Sabahier Friendly Hills Rearrangeaient 19 10 �2,7QO.W $2,700.00
190-10 143 Decarah Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-278W- Ernest Jr. & Margazet Eilers Friendly Hills Rearrangement 2p 10 $2,700.W $2,700.00
200-IO ?41 I?ecorah Lane
Mendota Hei ts MI�T 55120
�
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUSDIVISION . LOT BLK STREET TOTAL
• NO. DESCRIPTIQN NO. NO. RECONST.
27-27800- Stephen A. McCrcedy Friendly Hills Rearraugement 21 10 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
210-10 737 Decorah Lane .
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 '
27 27800- Maureen Ana Kucera Friendly Hills Reanangenient 22 10 �2,700.00 $2,700.00
220-10 733 Decorah Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Fdward F. & M.L. Pedersen Friendly Hills Reanangement 23 10 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
230-10 725 Pontiac Place
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- oger D. & Nancy C. Plath Friendly Hills Rearrangement 24 10 $2,700.00 �2,700.00
240-10 721 Pontiac Place
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 '
27-27800- Kelly & Teresa Obrien Friendly Hills Rearrangement 25 10 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
250-10 717 Pontiac Place
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Merkan Corporation Friendly Hills Rearrangement 1 11 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
010-11 706 Robert Street South
St. Pau1, MN 55107
27-27800- Vernon & Antoinett� Larson Friendly Hills Reatrangement 2 11 �2,700.00 $2,700.00
020-11 736 Dccorah Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Ann E. Weaver Friendly_Hills Reartangement —3 — —11— � $2,700.00 — -- $2;700.00
030-11 740 Deco�ak Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Carl & Janet Carlson Friendly Hills Rearran ement , OO:UO— , 00:00'
� 1�—
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDPVISION '. LOT BLK STREET T4TAL
NU. DESCRIPTiUN � NU. NO. RECONST.
2'7-27800- Robert D. Brack Friendly Hills Rearrangement 5 11 �2,700.W �2,70p.q0
050-11 'T46 Decorah Lane
Mendota Heights,. MN 55120 '
27-278W- i�onald 7. & V�ra Stahl Friendly Hills Rearrangement 6 11 $2,700.W $2,700.00
060-11 752 Decorah Iane
Mendota Heights, MN 5512A
21-2'T800- ih�right S. Caver Friendly I�ilis Rearrangement 7 21 $2,700.00 $2,�00.00
070-11 756 Decorah Lane -
Ivlendota �Ieights, MN S51?A
27-27800- Dakota Couaky HRA Friendly Hills Rearrangement 8 11 $2,704,W $2,7QQ.00
080-11 2496145th Street t'V.
Rosemount, MN 55068
2'7-278W- obert R. & Mary E. Adam Friendly Hills Rearraugement 9 11 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
090-11 2270 Apache Street
Mendota Heig�.ts, MN 55120
27 278Q0- Mary Ann Hoyt Friendly Hills Rearrangement 10 11 $2,700.pQ $2,700.00
100-11 2276 Apache Street
, Mendota Haights, MN 55120
27-27800- Maty C. Philblad Friendly IIilis Rearrangement 11 11 $2,700.tXf $2,700.00
110-11 �57 Pontiac Place �
Mcudota I�eights, MN 551?A
2'7-27800- ussell L. & Marcia F. Haugen Friendly Hills Rearrangement 12 11 $2,704,Q0 $2,70Q.04
120-11 �53 Pontiac Place
Mendota Heights, MN 5512A
27-27800- Marc A. & Patricia L. Angell Frtendly Hills Rearrangement 13 11 $2,700.OQ $2,700.00
130-11 ?49 Pontiac Place
Mendota Iieights, MN 5512Q �
27-27800- Daniel & Patricia 4'Keefe
1�0-I1 745 Pontiac Placa
Mendota Heights, MN SS 120
27 27800- Douglas & Christino Wenxel
150-11 739 Pontiac Place
Mendata Heights, MN 55120
27 27800- Donaid D. & n+Iarjarie Judge
010-12 727I�eokuk Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 551?.{}
27-27$00- Samuel & Leila G. Texer
020-12 'I18 Navajo Laue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27$p0- 'chatd L. & Armella Clem.en
030-12 722 Navajo Lane .
Mendata Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Glendel Akerlind
040-12 726 Nava,}o Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27 27800- George D. & M.J, Butt�eman
OSO-12 'I30 Navajo L�ane
Mendota Iieights, MN 551?A
27-27800- gh 8c Joan Myhrman
Ob0-12 — 'i36 Navajo Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Scott L. & Cathleen J. Koecheler
07Q- ava.3_ T -
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
14 1 11 I 1�2,700.00 I �2,7W.00
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 15 11 $2,70Q.00 �2,700.00
Friendly IIi21s Rean:ingeinent 1 12 $2,700.00 �2,7Q0.00
Friendly Hills Reanangement 2 12 $2,700.00 $2,700.40
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 3 12 $2,700.W $2,700.00
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 4 12 $2,700.00 �2,7Q0.00
Friendly F[ills Rearrangement S 12 �2,'7d0.00 $2,�00.00
Friendly Hills Reanangement __6 � _ i2— • — $2,700.00 � -- $2,700.00
Friendlv HiUs Rearraneement '7 12— --5-2.7A0:00 --$2:`700_00�
m
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDTVISION . LOT BLK STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTI4N N4. NU. RECONST.
27-27800- Arthur R. Pendfield III & Jean M. Stai Friendly Hills Rearrangement 8 12 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
48Q-12 ?44 Pontiac PIace
Mendota Heights,. MN 5512U '
�
2'7-27800- Michael C. Godes & Penny L. Krogmann Friendly Hills Rearrangement 9 12 $2,700.00 $2,70+0.00
Q90-12 748 Pontiac Place
Mendota Heights, MN 5512t}
27-27840- Mary A. Noreus FrisncUy F[ills Rearrang�ment 10 12 �2,'700.00 $2,700.00
1Q0-12 '7S2 Pontiac Place
Mendota I3eights, N1N 5512A
27-27800- Lionel & Myra Greenberg Friendly Hills Rearxangement 11 12 $2,70Q.OQ $2,700.OQ
110-12 '756 Pontiac Place
Mendota Heights, MN 5517A
27-278W- ob�n S. & Jaaet F. Canway Friendlq Hills Rearrangement 12 12 $2,700.00 $2,704.00
1Z{}-12 2288 Apaehe Street
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- omas & Loretta Connelly Friendly Hills Rearrangement 13 12 $2,975.W $2,975.00
130-12 296 Apache Street
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27 27800- G`ynthia A. �Ienriohs Friendly �fills Rearraugement 14 12 $2,�OO.IX} $2,700.04
140-12 '761 Keokuk Lane
Mendata Heights, MN 5517A �
2'7-27800- Kevin K& Wendy F. Dybal Friendly Hills Reacrangement 15 12 ' $2,70Q.OQ $2,700.00
i50-12 755 Keokuk Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-278W- Michael A. & Renee L. Sorenson Friendly Hills Reatrangement 16 12 $2,700.W $2,704.Q0
160-12 151 Keakuk Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 551?A
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND
27-2780Q- ames E. Jr. & Kakhyrn Reudelsterz Friendly Hills Rean�angement 17 12
1'70-12 747 Keokuk Lane
Mcadota Heights, MN SS12A � � '
27 27800- Bemice I. Wheeler Friendly F[ills Rearrangament 18 12
180-12 T43 Keokzxlc Lane
Mendota Hoights, MN 551?A
27-27800- Bart A. & Wanda L. Schempp Friendly Hi11s Rearrangement 19 12
190-12 739 Keakuk Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27 27840- omas F. & Evelyn Bergmaun Friendly Hiils Rearrangement 20 12
200-12 735 K,eokulc Lane
Mendota H�ights, MN 5512(? ,
27-27800- William & Ruth A. Keenan Friendly HiUs Rearrangetnent 21 12 '
210-12 731 Keokuk Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27 2780Q- Edward M. & Geraidine Boland Friendly Hills Reaxrangement 1 13
01Q-13 2263 Apache Streat
Mendota Heights, MN SS 12Q
27-278W- ohn & Frances Finnegan Friendly Hills RearrRugement ' 2 13
OZO-I3 2269 Apache StreGt
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
212?800- Roy S. & Lincla K. Irey Friendiy Hills Ttearrangexnent _ 3�-13 -
03Q-13 _- - 2275 Apache Street — �. � . _ .
Mendota Heigbts, MN 55120
27-278IX1- Eugene D. & K,R. Henrickson Friendly Hills Reai�augement 4 _
040-13 2283 ,
Mendota Heights, MN SS120 .
iM
700,00
$2�'�Qa.00
�2,700.00
�z,7no.00
$2,7t10.00
— $z,�oo.oa - �
700.00
$2,700.0(?
$2�%00.00
$2,700.Q4
$2,'70t3.00
$2,7Q0.00
$2,70U.OQ � ____
PARCEL REPUTED OWN�R AND SiJBDPVISION . LOT BLK STREET T4TAL
N4. DESCRIYPI4 � NO, Nt�. RECONST.
27278q0- omas V: & Janet J. Parrish Friendly Hills Rearraugement S 13 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
05Q-13 2289 Apache Street �
Mendota Heights, MN 5512A `
27 27804- oel C. & Julia W. Bennett Friendiy Hills Rearrangement 6 13 $2,700.q0 $2,700.00
p60-13 7 Roauake Romd
Sunfish Lake, MN 55118
27 278W- Kathryn Kuleukamp Friendly �[ills Rearrangemeut 7 13 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
070-13 2305 Apache Street
Mendota Hsights, MN 5512Q .
2'7-278()0- obert & R. Gruenenfelder Friendly Hills RearrRngement 8 13 $2,700.W �2,700.00.
080-13 ?71 K�okuk Lane
Cottage Grove, MN 55016
27-27800- obert & Jean Gilbert Friendly Hills Rearr�ngement 9 13 �2,700.pQ $2,700.00
090-13 '177 Keokuk Lano
1Vtendota Heights, MN 55120
�•
27 27800- osemarie Rued Friendly Hi1Is Rearrungement 10 13 $2,700.W �2,70p.00
100-13 '787 Keokuk L,an,e
M�ndota I�eights, MN 5512A
27-2780Q- ubert & Glenna Meier Friendly �:Eills Rearrangement 1 I 13 �2,700.00 $2,700.00
1 IO-13 795 Kcokuk I.ane
M�ndota Heights, MN 5512p '
27-278W- Danna M. Li11ia Friendly Hills Rearrangement 6 14 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
060-14 ?09 Cheyenna Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 5512Q
020-15 �06 Cheyenne Lau�
Me�tdota Iieightsy I►+1N 552ZA
27-278p4- Daniel W. Regan
030-15 714 Pontiac P1aca
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- S�amuel & Janet Thompson
040-1� '709 Oca1a Lana
Mendata �Ieights, MN 55120
27-27800- Arthur C. & Dorothy Janota
090-16 702 Ocala Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-2'18Q0- Robert Jr. & Darlene Misner
1W-i6 �Ob f3cala Latte
Mendata �ieights, NIN 551?A
27-2780Q- Donald & Bevcrly Nechodom
110-16 710 Ocala Lanc
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
2'7 27800- David & Shellcy Janecky
120-16 720 Pontiac Placa
Mendata Heights, MN 5512A
27-27800- Arthur Bmwn
' 130-16 724 Pontiac Place —
� Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-2'7800- Michael A. & Laura M. Weinberger
140-16 7i9 Decorah Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
SUSDTVLSION , LOT BLK STREET 1 uTAl.,
NO. NO. RECONST.
Friendly Hills Reatrangement 2 15 $2,700.Q0 $2,704.00
Friendly Hills Rearrungenxent 3 iS $2,700.00 $2,70Q.00
Fxiendiy Hills Rean�tngement 4 15 $2,700.A0 �2,70f1.00
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 9 15 $2,700.00 �2,700.00
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 10 16 $2,7Q0.00 $2,70p•00
Friendly I�ills Rearrangement 11 16 $2,750.00 $2,750.00 �
Friendly Hills Rearrar�gement 12 16 $2,7W.U0 $2,700.00
Friendly Hills Rearrangenzcnt 13 16 — �2,700.00 -- — — $2,700.00 —
Friendly Fiills Rearrangexnent 14 16 2 0.4,.Q�_ __---$2,700=UO-
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDPVISION . LOT BLK STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. RECONST.
27-27800- Donald & Marvell Grilz Friendly Hills Rearrangement 15 16 �2,700.00 $2,700.00
150-16 715 Decorah Iane •
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 '
27-27800- Alvin F. Alice L. Bohne Friendly Hills Rearraugement 16 16 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
160-16 711 Decorah Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- ohn W. Burke Friendly Hills Rearrangement 17 16 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
170-16 707 Decorah Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Vaughn & Ruth Ann Stai Friendly Hills Rearrangement 18 16 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
180-16 703 Decorah Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Mazk R. & Janis B. Aune Friendly Hills Rearrangement 1 17 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
010-1? 708 Decorah Iane -
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- obert A. & Georgene Beales Friendly Hills Rearr�ngement 2 1'1 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
020-17 712 Decorah Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Charlotte D. Marks Friendly Hills Rearrangement 3 17 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
030-17 716 Decorah Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- obert N. & Ianda L. Skolnik Friendly Hills Reatrangement 4 17 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
040-17 720 Decorah Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- William & Rita Lew Friendly Hills Rearrangement 5 17 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
050-1? 726 Decorah Lane
Meridota Heights, MN 55120
�
..�_, � „_�
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER �
N4. DESCRIPTION
27-27800- Larry L. & Kathleen A. Shemoi
Qb4-1? 735 Navajo Laue
Mendota Htights, MN 551?A
2�-27800- Gerald & Geraldina Hoye
070-17 729 Navajo Lane
Mendota. xeights, MN 5512a
27-21800- David A. Nelson
osa17 725 Navajo I.ane
Mendota Heights, MN 5S 12Q
27-27800- Patrick T. Larson
090-1'7 �21 Navajo Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Elizabeth V. Melzaxek
100-17 717 Navaja Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27 27800- Chery1.L. IVtiilard
010-18 730 Keokuk Lano
Mendota Fieights, MN 55120
27-27800- oger Grabawski & P. Darling
020-18 734 Keokuk Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 551?A
2T-27800- Lloyd & Editli Julson
050-18 746 Keokuk Lana
Mendata Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- re I& Ione Kanevsky
Qb0-18 75 -
Mendata Heights, MN 55120
6 I 17 1 I $2,700.0o I a2,'100.00
Friendly Hills Rearrangement '7 17 $2,70Q.00 $2,700.00
Friendly Y[ills Rearrangement 8 17 $2,700.00 �2,700.00
Friendly Fiills Rearrangement 9 17 $2,704.QQ �2,7Q0.00
Friendly Hills Rearrangemsnt 10 17 �2,700.00 $2,7Q0.00
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 1 I8 $2,700.00 �2,7C10.00
Friendly F.[ills Rearrangement 2 18 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
Friendly Hi1ts Rearrangament �5� _18_ --$2,7W.Q0 — � -$2,700.04
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 6 18 2,�OO.OU--� $�700:00
.�
PARCEL REPUTED OWN�R AND SUBDIVISION . LOT BLK STREET TOTAL
NC►. DESCRIPrION NO. N4. RECONST.
27-2780Q- Marcus T Connolly & Marilyn J. Spindler Friendly Hills Rearrangement 7 18 52,700.00 $2,700.00
070-18 2330 Apache Street -
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 '
2'i-27800- Chazles J. & Lois R. Parsons Friendly Hills Rearrangement 8 18 $2,700.00 $2,70t3.00
080-18 2332 Apache Strreet
Mendota Heights, MN 5512A
2?-2780Q- Elwood &�Beth L, Z,astine Friendly F:[ilts Rearrangement 9 i8 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
090-18 2336 Apache Street
Mandota I�iaights, MN 5512t?
27-27800- Cedric R. & 7.B. Schrankler Friendly Hills Reanangement 12 18 $2,700.00 �2,700.00
120-18 2350 Apache Strect
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
2'7-27800- A1ice M. Thesi.ng Friendly Hills Rearrangement 13 18 $2,700.W $2,70(1.00
130-18 2354 Apach� Street
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Diana E. Foley Friendty Hiils Rearrangement 1 19 $2,700.Oi1 $2,704.00
010-19 2359 Apache Street
Mendata I�eights, MN 55120
27-27800- Edwazd A. & Sa11y Ann Tande Friendiy Iii11s Rearrangsment 2 19 '$2,700.IX} $2,700.00
p20-19 2355 Apache Strreet
Mendata Haights, MN 55120
27-27800- Sylvia G. Nelson Friendly Hills Rearraugement 3 19 $2,700.0{? $2,700.40
030-19 2349 Apache Street
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Paul & G. Joanne Chamberlin Friendlq Hills Rearrangement 4 19 ' $2,700,00 $2,700.00
440-19 345 Apache Street
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 •
PARCEL REPUTED UV'VNER AND
NO. DESCRIF''rION
2'7-2'7800- oan W. Crisp
050-19 2341 Apache Street
Mendota Heights, MN 551?A
27 27800- Peter L. & Vera Gochberg
460-19 233T Apache Street
Mendota Heights, MN 55124
2'7-2780q- Craig M. & Kristine M. Wanamaker
070-19 2331 Apachc 5treet
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
2? 27800- William & Glaria Callai�an
Q80-14 772 Keakuk Lano
Mendota Haights, MN 5512A
27-2'7800- arold F. & Kathleen Miller
090-19 780 Keokuk L.ane
Mendota. Heights, MN 551?A
2'l 2780Q- K:athteen Skradski
1qQ-14 786 Keokuk Lane
Mendota. Heights, MN 55120
2'7-2'7800- K�vin T. & Karen Jane McMenimen
110-19 787 Mohican Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
2T 2'I800- ames D. F2vranca
120-19 — 781 Mohican Laue
Mendota H�ights, MN 551?A
27-27800- Gary W. Raddatz
- hi
Mendota Heights, MN 5512A
BLK
Friendly Hills Reairangement 5 . 19 �2,700.00 $2,700.Q0
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 6 19 $2,7i�0.00 $2,�00.00
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 7 19 $2,700.OQ $2,7U0,44 �
Friendly Hilis Rearrangement 8 19 $2,700.00 $2,'700.00
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 9 29 S2,7UQ.Q0 $2,740.04
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 10 i9 $2,700.t30 $2,'700.00
Friendly Hills Reartaugement 11 19 $2,70U.OQ $2,7QQ.OQ
Fitendly Hills Rearrangement -12 - -19 - — � $2,700.00 � $2,700:U0
Friendlv Hills Rearran;�ement �70Q� , .
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER ANU SUBDTVT,SION � LOT BLK STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTIUN NU. NU. RECONST.
27-278W- Michael S. Leech & Jill E. Hellenberg Friendly Hills Rearra�zgement 14 19 �2,700.W $2,700.00
140-19 �73 Mohican Lane
Mendota Heights,. MN 5512q �
27-27800- Sharon S. I.eah & Mark C. Lemke Priendly Hills Rearrangemen.t 15 19 �2,700.W $2,700.Q0
1�Q-19 76'1 Mahican Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
2? 27800- Gerald & Ar1e�n Nsrisan Friendly Hills Rearrangement lb 19 $2,'700.00 $2,700.00
160-19 '163 Mohican Lane
Mendota I�eights, MN 55120
27-27800- 'chard & Juliann Johnson Friendly Hills Reartaugement 17 19 �2,704,04 �2,704.00
1'70-19 '7S9 Mohican Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 5512Q
27-2780fJ- Steven J. & Shelly Barenbaum Friendly Hills Rearrangement 18 19 j;2,700.00 $2,70p.00
i80-19 755 Mohicaa Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
2'1-27800- Donna Mae Anderson Friendly Hills Rearrangement 19 19 �2,700.04 $2,700.Q0
190-19 �51 Mohican Lane
Mendata Heights, MN 5512t}
2']-278IXl- Darraw & Lori Daczyk Friendly Hills Reanangement ZO 19 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
2Q0-19 '749 Mahican Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 5512t}
27-27800- David A. Epstein & Carol S. Fjelstad Epstein Friendly Hills Rearrangement 1 24 �2,700.00 $2,700•00
Ol 1-20 '7S2 Mahicaa Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- 'chard C. & Diann Wold Friendly Hills ReanRngement 2 20 $2,700.UQ $2,700.00
020-20 754 Mohican Zana
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
PARCEL
C�]'.�/�I � : ►11
-27800- Mavis Karn
Q-?A 758 Mohican Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
2'7800- I.eander & C. Sehoenecker
0-2Q 762 Mohican Lane
Mandota Heights, MN 55120
-27800- Maureen Ann Lynch
0-20 776 Mahican Lana
Mendota �Ieiglits, MN 55120
-27800- Donald J. & Janet L. Stenha�g
0 2A �70 Molucan Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
-27800- William H. & Geraldine I.erbs
Q-?A 774 Mohican Iaue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
-27800- Loren E. & Charlene Steele
0-?A 780 Mohican Lane
Mendota �Ieights, MN 551?A
27800- Kenneth B, & 14�ary K. Weisenburger
0-20 2350 Fueblo Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 5512A
-2780U- Ruth S. 7ohnsan
0 21 736 Malncan Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
-27$00- Thomas C. & Marsha A. Knuth
Ar2-�-- u '
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
SUBDIVISION . LOT BL]
NU. NO
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 3 20
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 4 20
Friendly Hills Rearraugement 5 20
Friendly Hills Rean�►ngement 6 7A
Friendly Hills Rearratigement '1 ZO
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 8 20
Friendly F[i1ls Rearxangement 9 2t3
Friendly Iiills Rearrangement 1 21
Hills
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
�2,70CI.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
700.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,7QU.00
$2,7(I0.00
$2,7W.00
$2,7t�?.00
PARGEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION . LOT BLK STREET TOTAL
N4. DESCRIPTIUN NO. NU. RECONST.
27-278Q0- Richard H. F.dinger Friendly Hills Rearraugement 3 21 52,700,U0 $2,70Q•00
03Q 21 T44 Mohican Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 '
2'I-27800- Bernard. P. & Damaris Friel Friendly Hills Rearrangement 14 21 $2,700.00 $2,70Q.00
142-21 7'SO Mohican I.aue I.ots 10-17, Blk. 20 & Lots 414,
Mendota FIeights, MN 55120 Bllc 21 &'STac Sts adj
27-27800- Carale Bonine North Friendly I�iils Rearrangement 16 Zl $2,700.04 52,700.00
160-21 2376 Pagel Road
Menc3ota Heights, MN 5512Q
27-27800- Katherine L. Kladstrup Frriendly Hills Rearrangement 17 21 $2,700.00 $2,70p.00
174 ZI 2354 Page1 Road
Mendata Heights, MN 55120
27-278W- Koushik K Ghosh Friendly Hills Rearrarugement 18 21 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
184-22 2354 Page2 Road
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Mark G. & Kakhy Enderlein Rriendly Hills Reamangement 19 21 $2,700.00 $2,700•00
190-21 2353 Ptteblo Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27 2780Q- Michael & Gail Regan Friendly iIills Rearrangement 2t} 22 $2,700,00 $2,700.00
201-21 2345 Pueblo Drive
Mendota Heigbts, MN 5512U
27-27$W- David R. & Michele Odalen Priendly Hills Rearrangement 21 21 $2,700.00 $2,7W.00
210-2I 2339 Pueb2o Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 •
27-278Q0- Daniel & Kristine M. O'Gara F�iendly Hills Rearrangement 22 21 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
22Q-21 2331 Pueblo Drive
Mendoka Heights, MN 55120
�
�
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AN
NO. DESCRII'TION
27-27800- Donald P. & Alice Baier
270-22 741 Mohican Court
Mendota Heights, .MI�T 55120
27-27800- Edmund & Betty L. Messervey
280-22 737 Mohican Court
Mcndota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Robert E. & Sheryl I.everton
290-22 735 Mohican Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Leo & Patricia Christiansen
300-22 731 Mohican Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-27800- Daniel A. & Renee E. Schmid
310-22 729 Molucan Court
Mendota Heights, MN 551?A
2731900- Lawrence S. Mack
010-00 2347 Pagel Road
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-31900- errance D. Wilk
020-00 2351 Pagel Road
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
2731900- ymond & Elizabeth Haselberger
030-00 2357 Pagel Road
Mendota I�eights, MN 55120
27-31900- Neil N & L ]ylacrorie
040-00 2381 Page Road.
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
LOT I BLK
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 27 22
Friendly Hills Rearrnngement 28 22
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 29 22
Friendly Hills Reanangement 30 22
Friendly Hills Rearrangement 31 22
Haselberger Addition 1 0 '
N 130 ft of Lot 1
Haselberger Addition 2 0
Haselberger Addition � 3 � 0
�-_.� ' � .
STREET TOTAL �
:ECONST.
62.700.00 $2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
�2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
$2,700.00
�2,700.00
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SLTBDTVTSION LOT BLK STREET TOTAL
NCi. � DESCItIl'TIQN NO. Np. RECONST.
27-31900- ohn M. & Jane H. Rabbins Haselberger Addition 5 0 $2,700.Oq $2,700.00
05Q-00 2341 Pagel Road
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 '
2'7-319(30- Catherine K. Paulsen Haselberger Addition 6 Q $800.W $800.00
050-00 803 Hazel Court
Mendats� Heights, MN 55120
21-3190Q- ohn F. & Sandsa A. O'Brien I�aselberger Addittion 13 0 �800.00 $800.00
130-00 $07 Hazel Court Ex W 17'7 ft to State for Hgwy as
Mendota Heights, MN 5512Q m�stued on S line
27-6830Q- Ken R. & Catherine Edwards Simek Rearrangement 1 1 $$00,00 $800.Q0
010-01 810 FIazel Cauxt
Mendoka Heights, MN 5512Q
27-683W- William & Virgiaia Simek Simek Rearrangement 2 1 1+800.00 $800.00
020-01 814 Har.el Caurt
Mendota Heigllts, MN 5512A
2'7-b83W- ames P. & Ju1ie Los2eben Simek Rearrangement 3 1 $800.00 $800.00
oso-oi srs x�i cau�c
Mendota �Ieights, MN 5512A
27-G83W- Paul W. & Elizabeth Wild Simek Rearrangement 4 1 $800.00 $800.00
040-01 813 Hazel Court
Mendata Heights, MN 5512Q
29-68300- ames J. Boyd & Sharon D. Moeri Simek Rearrangement S 1 �800.00 $800.Q0
050-01 809 Hazel Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
a
e
TO:
FROM:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 31, 1995
Mayor, City Council and City Adminis �
�
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis��1�
SUBJECT: CAO No. 95-03: Schaefer - Critical Area Review
DISCUSSION
Mr. Keith Heaver, contractor, and Mr. Joe Schaefer, of 1889 Hu�
appeared at a public hearing held by the Planning Commission at their �
1995 meeting. Mr. Schaefer is requesting City approval of a Modified :
allow construction of a porch addition, walkway, garage expansion, po�
retaining wall. There are no variances to the Critical Area Ordinance. (
attached Planner's Report and Application).
The Planning Commission reviewed this proposal and expressed
concerns. One anonymous letter was received from a"concerned neig
Planning Commission stated they gave little or no credence to the letter
was unsigned.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to close the public hearing.
Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend that City Council approv
Modified Site Plan, as proposed, to allow construction of a porch additi�
walkway, garage expansion, pool and retaining wall.
ACTION REO,UIRED
Conduct a public hearing. If the City Council desires to implemer
Planing Commission recommendation, they should pass a motion to app
Critical Area Modified Site Plan, as proposed, to allow construction of a
addition, walkway, garage expansion, pool and retaining wall.
KLB:kkb
;r Lane,
gust 22,
;e Plan to
and
ease see
o major
bor". The
because it
ie
the
the
>ve a
orch
.�
�
C(JNSI�L'i'1:��.� i'LAti[�.il:>
L.4i�IJ�i.':�I'f•. ,�1:c'Illli.�l"IS
iUl1 I=1RST A.'E\LiC• i�C)I:IIi
SUI"TE 310
MINT�'EAPOLIS. \lIv ��lili
C 1� •.�.�H i:ii10
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:
CASE NO: �
APPLICANT:
PROPERTY OWNER:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PREPARED BY:
PL�ANNING CONSIDERATIONS
Background.
August 22, 1995
CAO 95-03
Heaver Design and Construction/Keith
Heaver �� �
7oe Schaefer
1889 HunterLane
Critical Area Site Plan Review
C. John Uban
The Schaefers who live at 1889 Hunter Lane wish to build a pool and porch addition to their home
and add a third car to their existing garage with connectiifg walkway to the home. The properiy is
in the critical area of the Mlnnesota River. The construction although outside the 40 foot bluff
setback will require gcading which will result in more than five feet of change on the property. This
earthwork may involve more than one hundred cubic yards of earthwork.
Mr. Hea.ver appeared before the City Council at their August 1 meeting to request a Modified Site
Plan Review by City Council for the pool complex and retaining wall. At the time of the Council
m�ting, the City Couna'1 felt that this proposed plan might have an impact on the neighbors and did
not wish to proceed with a Modified Site Plan Review or waive the requirements for a public hearing.
The City Council directed Mr. FIeaver to proc.eed with a full Critical Area Review to the Planning
Conunission for their recommendation and public hearing.
' Because Mr. Heaver submitted only plans necessary for Modified Site Plan Review additional
information may still be forthcoming from Mr. Hea.ver.
The City has received a letter of concern &om adjacent neighbors. A public hearing notice has been
� August 22, 1995 Case C.�40 95-03
published and mailed.
Critical Area Review.
The home with detached garage sets on a high knoll above H'ighway 13. Adjacent nei
west sit below the site on areas above the bluffline. The attached area. sketch shows th
of the neighbors to the subject property. A plan has been submitted showing the contou
but no slope analysis has been provided to show the edge of the 40 percent bluff slopes.
setback line is indicated on the attached Site Plan. Elevations of the proposed poc
retaining wall are shown indic�ating that the retaining wall will not exceed five feet. A se�
the pool illustrates how the retaining wall will create a flat area for pool construction
over five feet deep, thus creating a change in the grade greater than the five feet n�
Critical Area Review.
Page 2
hbors to the
relationship
s of the land
The 40 foot
, patio, and
xon through
The pool is
�essitatin� a
The existinng vegetation consists of three identified oak trees and a wooded perimeter. �t is assumed
because no other vegetation was shown on the plan that the construction area is primarily turf grass.
The oak trees as shown are to be preserved, however, construction comes very clos�e to the tree
trunks. Specaial conistruction techniques are needed to protect the root zone of the oak� or they will
die. I
The grading plan shows spot elevations, and a siltation fence around the perimeter of � nstruction.
The drainage of the site will not significantly change as the flat area of the pool will rain into the
terraced sod area. The natural drainage pattem of the site will stay the same beyond �the retaining
wall perimeter.
The retaining wall is to be constructed of interlocldng concrete wall block. The hei�
not to exceed five feet. The concrete blocks have a stone like appearance and will g
retaining walls built of wood and even natural limestone. I suggest the color of the
natural limestone. �
A Landscape Plan showing shrubs along a portion of the retaining wall has been in
developmern package. The shrub types and sizes are not specified and should be clarifia
Additionally, it is wise to have some bazrier above a wall over three feet in height for saf
The shrub planting could extend further around the perimeter of the pool where the
three feet. The Landscape Plan shauld also include the tree protection techniques for th�
trees.
Fencing is required by law for pool installations. A fence location has been indicated
not detail�of the type of fence has been submitted.
Paul Berg, the City Code Enforcement Officer has also sent a memo to the City
the proposed construction This is included in your package for review.
is proposed
rally outlast
ck rep�icate
luded in the
on the p1an.
ty purposes.
�vall exceeds
existing oak
the plan but
reviewing
The City has also received a letter &om neighbors with concerns about the constructio�f a pool on
this pmperty. Because the property is higher than the surrounding lots; its construction not block
£
Augusi 22, I99S Case C�10 95-03 Page 3�
the iiver views of adjacent homes. Other concerns about noise and neighborhood safety axe already
addressed in various City codes. Noisy parties and pools without protective fences are subject to
direct City action. '
Action.
Review the applicant's request and make a recommendation to the City Council.
Considerations.
1. Provide more detail on the Landscape Plan.
2. Provide tree protection and root protection construction techniques for the oak trees.
3. Provide detail on proposed fencing.
�
�
a
�
0
9
� ,
�t� t�,u��,, �f,y/ps-
t
Atzgttst i2, Z995
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
City af Mendota Heights
RE: 1889 Hunter Lane, const�ruction of swimming pool, retaining
wall, fence, spa tub, deck, porch and an enclased walkway.
We don't feel that the Critical ordinance should'���be madi�ied for
a noncritical applicaiion such as a swimming pool and other
requests. We are against this rea_uest.
We chose to Iive in �his particular neighborhaod because of �he
woods/wilderness ezperieace. We have enjoged the sezeneness and
the quietaess and wish to continue to da so. We do not �eel it
is appropriate that a swimming poal and the other elemeats be
allowed ta be constructed in this waods type setting.
While such construction may be Ieqal, it is not conducive to the
quietaess of the woods. This propertp is located en a large
wooded lot. � -
Our concerns:
* disrugtion o� the lifestyle of the immediate aeighborhood,
* noisy parties late into the evening �
* infriAqement of no�se in a quiet neiqhborhood .
* spraying for bugs/mosqui�oes, spray drifting into
neighboring yards
* decrease of property value if/when selling the house
because of the pool
* pa'ssible danger te small children in neighborhood (17 in
immediate cul de sac)
* cutting down, of large trees to make raom for proposed
canstruc�f.on ( cuttinq a]. ready commenced)
,:
Disgruntled, alarmed, conceraed neighi�ors of 1889 Hunter Lane.
August 10, 'E 995
Mr. Keith Neaver
Heaver Design and Construction
875 Mendakota Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Oear Mr. Heaver:
� �l
1��ier�►dota H�i
The letter is to inform you that we have received your application for a� r'
�►rea t�rdinance Review. Your appiication is considered complete and w tl be
forwarded to the Planning Commission for their mesting on u u 2 995
The Planaing Commission is an advisory body #hat conducts public he�
� reviews applications for recommendation to the City Council. The Plai
Commission reserves the right ta request additional, ar supplementat, i
State Statute allows the Planning Commission to request an additional
days for �eview of any zoning matter.
The Pianning Commission mes#ing stacts at �:30 o'ctock P.M. here at C'
the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, will need to be present
that your application may receive Commission�consideration.
If you have any questions, please feel free ta con#act me at 452-'f 85�.
Sincere[y,
�1/V�.�.. �,�G�i-�•��`-
Kevin Batcheider
Administrative Assistant
4
110i Vicioria Curve -�endvta Heights, �N • 5v1i8
�s �and
9
rma�ion.
ty (64)
Hail in
� order .
� C ity o�
.�.,, .� 1Viendota Heights
August 4, 1995
Mr. Keith Heaver
875 Mendakota Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Heaver:
I am writ'rng to formally notify you that the City Council, at their August 1, 1995 meeting,
declined to waive the public hearing requirement on the C�ritical Ama R,eview request for the
pmposed oonst�uction project at 1889 Hunt�r Lane. (CAO 95-03j. Because of the extent of
the�improvements Proposed, the Cixy Council prefeired that this request receive the review of
the Planning Commission through the public hearing pro�ess required for Critical Area site
plan approvals.
This item will be scheduled for the August 22, 1995 Planning Commission meeting. A
published notice has been sent to the SouthWest R�eview, the C�ty's oi�icial newspaper. In
order t]�at praper review of the pmposed pnoject by the Planning Commission can. occur, it
may be necessary to sabmit additionai information, or revise the plans: A►s we discussed on
the telephohe, you will visit next we�k to review the site plans for revi.sions, if neoessary. �
I may be reached at 452-1850 if you have aay questions, or coacerns..
Sincerely,
��^L"'� �
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assist�ant
�
1101 Victoria Curve -1Viendota►. Heights,lViN �• 55118 452•1850
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
NOTICE OF HEARW,G
August 2, 1995
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given that #he Planning Commission of Mendota H�
meet at 9:15 o'clock P.M., or as soon as possible thereafter, on Tussday, �
"! 995, in #he City Hal! Counci! Ghambers, 114'! llictoria Curve, Mendot�
M�nnesota, to consider an application from Mr. Keith Heaver, of Heaver D�
Constcuction, for a Gritica! Area Qrdina�ce Modified Site Plan review #o
construction of an i� ground swimming pool, retai�mg wal1, fence, spa tuE
a porch and an enclosed waikway on the following descc�bed property:
[.ot 1, Block 1, tJak Point
�
More particutarly, this property is iocated at 18$9 Hunter Lane
This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Critical Area t3rd
403. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the request 1
Criticat Area Ordinance Modified Site Plan witl be heard at this meeting.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
Auxiliary aids for disabted persons are avaitable upon request at
hours in advance. if a notice of less than 9 20 hours is received, �
Mendota Heights wil! make every attempt to provide the aids, hov
may not be possible on short notice. Please co�tact G'rty Administra�
1$5Q.�
ghts will
gust 22,
Heights,
sign and
Ilow the
a deck,
i�
the
ast 120
: Cify of
Irer, this
( at 452-
_. OTr21./95 16: 0,5 FAT 612 452 8940 MENDOTA HEIGIiTS � � l� 002
Case No. CAO Q �- ��
' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Dakota County,. Mi.nnesota
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
OF
CRITICAL AREA DEVELOPMENT (Ordinance N0. 403)
/
Date of Application v % �
Fee Paid
. . Receipt Number
Applicant: � ,
Name : �f 'z A,�J !z /L ,�'1��'l C� s � �or5lS� /N L " �
Last �'irst
Addresa:
m
�
Number & Street City ." " State Zip Code � .
Phane s (g a7�0��'3Z
Some ' � . Work
Owner :
Name : :�b 1� �GJa�'�� f�,�L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Last • � First Initial
Address : / gjS9 ,ly�'•v7'Fr� (:�c,L>"� /'��/IJd f;� �-T�
Number & Stree Citq State•' Zip'
Street Location of Propertq in Question:
f �s y l�v��rr,2 �aNrf � � �
I,egal Description of Propertq: •
l.�oy % /.� �-� G�L 1: o.at�, ,�a�,v r . � -- =
1 - -. ' • .n_ . . . .
Type of Request: • Varfance
Site Plan Approval •
Modified Site Plan Approval
e
07%21/95 ].6:07 �FAx 612 452 8940
Present Zoning of Property:
Present Use of Propertg:
Proposed •Qse• of Property:
1riENDOTA HEIGHTS
�� /� l L�Ti !� L-
r!�,/ �1J-�'��G C�
� Il.�/�.�/7 t1, C.�
0
f�] 003
I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on e additional
m��terial are true. n .
, Signa�ure of Applic
� ,��, , % _ �
y /5'?i
' Date 7 �
, Received by (�itle)
Note: The followinq information shall be provided in the site pl s
� l. Location of the property, including such infozmation as e name
and numb�zs of adjoining roads, railroads, existing subd visions,
or other lan�dmarks. ,
� 2. The name and address of the owner(s)�or developer(s�, the�section,
township, range, north point, date, and scale of drawings, and,
number of sheets.
� 3. Existinq topography as indicated on a contour map having aontour
• interval no greater than twe (2) feet per contourj the c ntour map
� shall also clearly delineate any bluff line, all streams, i.ncluding
' � intermittent streams and swales, riners, water bodies, an wetlands
located ori the site. . '
,� 4. A plan delineating the existing drainage of the water setling forth
• in which direction the volume, and at•what xate the storm water is
conveyed from the site in se�ting forth tihose areas on th site where
storm water collects and is qradually percolated into the ground or
slowly re].eased to stream or lake.
5. A description of tYie soils on the site including a map in�
types by'areas to be disturbed as we11 as a soil report a
informa'tion on the suitability of the soils for the type�
proposed anc� for tHe�.type of sewage disposal proposed-and
any remedial steps to be taken by the developex to render
suitable.._.A11 areas proposed for grading shall be identi;
soil type,'both as to soil type of existing top soil and ,
oE the new contour. The lacation and.extent of any erosi�
sha1Z be included in the soils description.
ting soil
_develop�aent
�scribing
ae soi].s
:d by .�
u t�
areas,
� 6. A description of the flora and fauna, which occupy the sit or are
occasionally found thereon, setting forth saith detail thos axeas
where tinique plant or animal species aiay be found on the s te: ••
�
II.. . 07%21/95 ___�.6.: 08 .FA7C 612 452 8940 MENDOTA HEIGHTS Qj 004
� 7. A description of any features, buildings, or areas which are of
historic significance.
)( 8. A map indicating proposed fi.nished grading shown at contours at
T T the same interuals proposed above or as required to clearly
indicate the relati.onship of proposed changes to existing topo-
graphy and remaining features.
� 9. A landscape plan drawn to an appropriate scale including dimensions,
distance, lvcation, type, size, and description of all existing
vegetation,'clearly lxating and de�cribing any vegetation proposed
Eor removal and all proposed landscape materiais which will be �dded
to this site as part of the development.
/\ 10. A propased drainage plan of the developed site delineata.ng in which
direction, volutae, and at what rate storm water will be conveyed
from the site and setting forth the areas of the site where storm
water will b� allowed to collect and gradually percolate into the
soi1, or be slow].y released to..streaa� or lake. The plan .shal3. also
set forth hydratzlic capacity of.a1Z atructures to be construc�ed or
existing stzuctures 'to be utilized, inc•luding volume or holding ponds
and desi+�n storms.
%� 11. An erosion and sedimentation controi plan inclicating the type, location,
and necessary technical information on confxol measures to be taken
both during and after construction inaiudi.ag a statement expressing the
calculated anticipated gross soil loss e�pressed in �on's/acres/year .
bo�h during and after construction. • '•
� 12. �The proposed size, alignment, height, and intended use of any structiares
to be erected or located on the site. •� . .
� 13. A clear delineation of all areas which•shall be paved vr surfaced
including a description of the surfacing material to be used.
14. A description of•the method to be prov�.ded for vehicular and pedestrian
access to the proposed developaaent and pubiic access to the river and/or
public river view'opportunities both before.and after developnentj a
description of the development•s impact on existing views of and along
the river.
15. A descriptioa of�all parking facilities to be provided as part of the
developiaent of the si�e including an analysis of parking needs '
generated by the proposed development. � ..
. 16: A delineation�of the area oz areas to.be dedicated for public use.
17. 'A delineation of the lxation and amounts of excavated �soils to be
stored on the site duri.ng'construction. ��� _
18. Any other information pertinent to that paxticular project which i.n
� the opinfon of the inspector or applicant is necessary or helpful for
the review of� the project.. � �_- �
TO:
FROM:
CITY 4F MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
1 8, 1995
Mayor, City Councii and City Admini
Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer V�'�' �
SUBJECT: CAO 95-03: Heaver - Modified Site Plan Approval -
9 889 Hu�ter [.ane
Mr. Joe Schaefer, owner of 1889 Hunter �ane, has hired Mr. Kei
Heaver Oesign and Construction, lnc. and Mr. Pat Hency, Prestige Poot:
construction work. Mr. Schaefer's property fa11s within the boundaries
Criticaf Area Ordinance and the cantractors are seeking City Cau�c�1 ap
Modified Critical Area Ordinance Site Plan Approval.
The City Council should note that the in ground swimming pool, �
on the attached site plan, wiit require moce tha� a five foot {5'} excava�i
more than 900 cubic yards of earth to be removed. Because of the amo
excavation �ecessary to construct the pooi, the City Plannec, Planning Ca
and City Council wiil need to review this request under separate cov�r. I
also note that rev�ew o# the assaciated construction of the retaining watE
enclosure fence will be done when the swimming pool critical area applic
returns for fuli Planning Commission a�d City Counc�l review.
,��scussto�
Tha project includes a spa tub, a deck, a porch and an enctosed �+
which connects the porch to the proposed garage addition (see attached
Upan review of the site plan submitted, all of the above proposed constr
be in excess of the required forty foot setback from the forty percent {4(
(blufftinej. 1 have also checked with Mr. Heaver and he has indicated no
be removed.
RECCIMMENDATION
i Heaver,
to do
f the
�ova! of a
shawn
i and
it of
...
�
plan).
m witt
slope
ss wilt
I recommend that the City Council approve the proposed constructi n under
the Modified Site Plan portiori of the Critical Area Ordinance which wauld Ilow
the construction ot a spa tub, a deck, a porch, an enclosed waikway and e
proposed garage addition, In addition, I recommend waiving the Critical A ea
Ord�nance application fee of $"I OQ.
� f • �
If City wishes to imp[ement the above recommendation to approve tl
requested Critical Area Ordinance Madified Site Plan, a motion should be p;
appravi�g the proposed constructian alang with •waiver of the Critica! Area
Ordinance Modified Site Plan review fee of $100. . .
�}
r .
. ` � - , �
..�o� �.►� :'
. ----~'''"'� �
u�� —'�`'�I : .
� -
.",;,. ' ' ; . ' •
..r' ', ' ' •y • �"i�� , _ w , : ,
r �,� • • �
���� +:�' ' � _t:
•;;,�• • . �'+t_ f� _ .
' . ., -i. �,f • �.:'..� . . .. . •, • �
.,, ,=,k.-» � :'� - ". ' • '
• � ' f ». -. ; ,,,;•. "': ' • t �
:.` . � �, , - • ,� - �«�.
� • . � • `�n `' ; .L . . �i
��j w• , .�i. ���;'~ '. :�•� �J
�y�^:H�. �)r r l 4 4��'��+! 1�
^Y I � . _ � _. �� �
�a
.� � VE�SA--L.O�C Ct3�iPt31'� NT�` .
TYPE A•
TYPE B.
, ,��
� -,1'` ,..;
.t� i . �: , .
i�'t��� �;�,� �; f' �
���. �.'. �=.�
CAP UiV1TS
' � �
;
_ - 'M�"���'~ -
�' �. -' � `� � r
��� ; #,�,� _ j jJr
, il �I r,.. • i C"" %�••�,
i. -� � � ! �•� zJ- , � � j I�'•t / n � .
l J. � a •• � 1
` 1 �.i � � � y� .! � �/
(
i�;�� �/j-���j .
{ y� '
� STANDARD V/L �
,/ �•.�,� �� � 1 1�,
� � � ..f.�!'� . i �tin�i �.! t. � " �:r _� �r
� . �,_,,.. �
r .
� - � K . • • . �l �` `� t: j/ �,;,• � :
�� �.�;;�, �...- i,' •; +� . • ,. -. r
�a • t �' �.! � '� % ,`
i�' •�..w. / % .
'TI J ; , . j. •.
.�
i !
L . _
�
UN[T
HALF UN[TiS
Oimensio�at Cha
■ VERSA-toK" ■
Weighr: 82 �bs.
�aae A�o: ?13 sq. ft.
UnitSize: 6"H lb"W 12"0
1-TUFF PiN
b�4"
;r: U'1" �
���.sA..-zvF� �►��
_
! �__. � �1
FflR �PALLS UP TO 4 FEET HIGH. PREPARE
A SHALL(7W TRENCH 4" DEEP AND 14" �t7IDE.
FROVIDE A LEVELING MEDIUM OF 1"-2" OF
COURSE SAND OR GRAVEL. -
. ,.Q,_„ �,-,� .. .
IT IS I1��RTAi�` THE FiRST COURSE i5 LAYED C3N UNDISTURBED SQIL. Ff3R
�VALLS THAT EXCEED 4 FEET IN HEIGHT OR FOR WALLS BEING Ct�NSTRUCTED
4N A RECFa`VTLY BACKFILLED AREA tNEAR A I�TEE'� BASE�fENT, ETC.),
C4MPACTION I5 NECESSARY TO 9Q-95 PERCENT OF ORIGINAL DENSITY.
M�iCHINfi COMPACTION. GEOGRiD. AND PER1�iiTS .�RE REOLiIRED FOR
RETAINING WA�LS THAT EXCEED 4 FEET IN HEIGHT. .
LAY THE FIRST COLTRSE, CORNERS FIRST. MAKI�TG SURE U:�ITS �.RE LEVEL
iLENGTFI & WIDTH�. FOR LONG ST'RAIGHT` SEG'T'ICtNS, A STRING LINE IS
USEFUL AND Sl'30ULD BE USED AT THE BACK OF THE UNITS. CARE MUST BE
TAKEN I.EV�.ING THE FIRST COIJRSE OVEIt T�IE ENT`IRE LENGT�. THIS
GOVERNS THE OUTCOME OF THE EN'f IRfi WALL.
-
INSIDE & OUTSIDE 90a CORN!ERS CAN BE CREkTED
BY SFLITTING VERSA-LOKTM UNITS TI�RQUGH THE
CEIVT`ER 'V' GROOVE. THIS CAN BE ACHiEVED BY
T�iE MANUFACTIJRER CIN PLANT� 4R QN-SITE
USING A BRICK-SET CHISEL.
IN"I'ERNAL & EX'I'ERNAL CURVES CAN BE ACHIEVED
EASILY. MI11tlMAX RADIUS TO aUTSIDE OF UNITS
IS S FEET. CCIIVIPENSATE FQR 3!4" SET BACK FRC►M
�TOP COURSE. EXAMPLE;
WALL 6 COURSES HIGH - 6 z 3/4" = 4 i/2"
INCREASE FIRST C��JRSE RADIU� BY 411 Z"
�
�
* f1DR ESIIIMTINC PURPOSES ONt,Y
�
2 �.
�
3 FT.
3 F% WAL.I.
� 4 FT» WAL�
Z 72' µtNlhtuhc _ 'it� eAt.tit
"�: : ' GR�1idLtt�2 FtLL ' i4tATE�21A1.
L��� CGMPIw^7m ' (1 4' P€,itFORATEO
W Lf.Gl J Wl� SOJL ..• GRNN 71L
� . ,;; � .�- ��. ��.
sMro e� auv� scu�: � /�~ «z •-c'
�r
,
�
�
,
H07�• �
(N idQS SiA'i�. ALtS C�trER k F;.
HICH REOUIK : P MRS. Mt0 O�tGt�
SHOUW 8= R BY A OUAUFlra ,
ENGiN'EER BE�ORi. COi�fSTRtICftOh.
i
2,3 � 4FOOi�
' WA LS
y
�l�y o� _�� �..
,.,,,, ,, � ,�iie�da�a H�i�hts
August 17, 1995
Mr. Keith Heaver
875 Mendakota Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Dear Mr. Heaver:
Your application for Critical Ar�a Site Ptan Review will be considered by the Planning
Commission at the�r next regularty s�cheduted meeting, which wiii be heid on Tuesday�
,Aug�rst 22, 1995. The P'lanrting Commission meeting st�rts at 7;34 o'clock P.M. here
are City Hatt in #he Councii Chambers. You, or a representative shoutd pian on
attendi�g the mesting, in ordec that your apptication will receive Commission
consideration.
if you have any questions, please feel free to coniact me.
Sincerely,�
�� �� 1�� ���, �
Kimbe�lee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
Enclosures
. 110� Vietaria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, l�l�►N � 5511� � 452• 18�0 �
. � . .
. City o�
�,,,. , 1Viendota Heights
September 1, 1995
Mr. Joe Schaefer
1889 Hunter Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Schaefer:
Your request for .Critical Area Modified Site P1an Review wiil be considered by the City
Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday,
September 5, 1995. The Council meeting starts at 7:3 o'clock P.M. here at City
Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the
� meeting in order that your application will receive Council consideration If you have �
any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,� �
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
cc: Keith Heaver
875 Mendakota Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
. ,
2
�
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights,lViN •.551�8 � 452 • 1850 ,
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 30, 1995
Mayor, City Council and City Administ
Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer ���
Preliminary Budget and Tax Levy for 1996
Each year the City must adopt a preliminary budget and tax levy
following year prior to September 15th, and certify the levy to the coun
Once the preliminary levy is adopted, it can be reduced but not increasE
county auditor then prepares parcel specific tax notices and mails them
our Truth-in-Taxation hearing.
Attached are these resolutions:
1.
2.
3.
Preliminary Budget Resolution.
Preliminary Tax Levy Resolution which includes the Gene
Levy plus the special purpose levies.
A Final Tax Levy Resolution for the Commercial Street Li
which is not subject to the Truth-in-Taxation Hearing.
At the present time, we are basing our tax projections on the p
figures from the county assessor's office. There was a considerable i
valuation �djustments for next year from reductions to over ten perce
Overall, there appears to be about a ten percent increase in (tax capa
about 40 percent from new construction.
For the
ty auditor.
:d. The
prior to ,
Fund
District
iminary
ge of
increases.
� ) with
The Pretiminary Budget, which shows a 4.9 percent increase in
dollars, is ready for approvai. A resident with na increase in valuatian
decrease in Ciiy tax {5-6 percent}. A tax payer whose house has a fi�
increase in value will see about a 0- 1 percent increase for 1996. Th+
S 154,Oa4 home paid a 1995 City tax of �466.94.
The budget as presented does no ai(ow far any of the add tevei:
for 1996. As you wi!! recall, these add level items include Heart Start �
outdaor warning siren improvements, an enhanced City Hatt telephane
the acquisition of the Burow Farm. It woutd be possibte to adjust the �
levy to include► any of these items which the Council might want to inc
must certify to #he County by September 15th, A workshop or speciai
could be heid up to September 14th. .
According to the dates provided by the County Auditor, we can
Truth-in-Taxation Hearing at our regutar meeting on December 5, 199�
The finai Resolutian must be adopted at a subsequent hearing pi
December 19#h. It will be necessary for us to hold a special meeting t
resolutions. [ suggest that a brief special meeting be held on Decembf
4:30 p.m. or 5:00 p.m. If work on the budget is not finalized on Dece
we could have our cantinuation hearing on December 9 2th with a sub:
hearing an December 13th. The time and dates of the continuafiion an
subsequent hearing must be announced at the December 5th hearing.
unable to use our regular December 19th meeting as this date has bee
t
by the County.
ACTtON REQUtRED
veratl tax
vill see a
percent
typical
af service
�vices,
ystem and
oposed
ide. We
nee#ing
ald our
�r to
adopt the
12th at
ber 5th,
ve are ,
preempted
if Council so desires, a mot+on should be passed adopting Resolu ion Na.
95- , RESOLUT/4N ADOPT/NG PROPOSEla BUDGET, Resolution No. 95- ,
RES(JLUTION APPROVING TENTATIVE 1995 LFVY COLLECTIBLE IN 19 6 and
Resolution No. 95- , RES4LUTIQN APPRQV/NG F/NAL 1995 TAX L VY F4R
SPFC/AL TAXING D/STR/CT NO. 7' COLLECTIBLE /N �'996.
LES:kkb
� ' -
�FUND FUND NO.
GENERAL FUND � C �p1
� , TOTAL EXPENDITURES
1-
DEPARTMENT 1993 1994 1995
' ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
City Council 17�750 18,880 19,990
Administration � 472,840 488,070 545�460
�
� Elections ' 1,650 27�600 ' 21�410
;
�
IPolice 9�168�830 1,205,030 1�285,500
Flre 185�190 232,970 223�020
� Code Enforr.�ment 130,010 137�630 128,060
PubGc Woiics
; Road & Bridge 455,220
� Parfcs 312�960
Planning 79,400
,cyding ' 12�520
Anima) Controi 4,970
;
Total General Fund
386�690
324�880
72�690
17.060
8�010
434�850
373,460
66�520
15,430
T�200
1995 1995
to 6/1l95 ESTIMATE
F
1996 � °/a
6,210 19,990 19,990 0.0%
161,270 - 545,420 532,540 2.4%
50 21,410 �� 37,000 72,$%
462,800 1,284,000 1,307,650 1.7%
51,80U 223,020 216,130 �.1%
45,440 128�060 133�Q60 3.9°k
145,240
157,790
17,560
5�190
3�880
437.490 472,490 8.7%
373�460 382,660 2.5°!0
66,220 67.360 1.3%
15.430 15�770 2.2°k
7,660 7,600 5.6%
EXpenditu�+es 2�841,340 � 2,919�510 � 3,120,900 � 1�057,230 � 3,122,160 � �3,192,250 � 2.3%
Generai Fund
Contingency 0
NON-0EPARTMENTAL
ADD-LEVELS'�
,
Heart start devices
Outdao� waming siren
Cit�r Hall telephone system
Burow Fartn
r
• Peroentage General Fund ill increase ov�
F�md expendihires.
72,000 � 60,000
000
1995 if the
0
0
0
0
� .� ��� � .� ��� � ��,
item is add�d to
�
�
�
�
8,400 2.6%
25,000 3.1 %
35�000 3.4°�
67,000 4.4%
���
C[TY {3F MENDCITA HEtGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
RESOLUTION ADOPTtNG PROPOSED BUDGET
WHEREAS, State Statu#e requires City Council adoption af a
Budget for '! 996 on or before September 2Cl, 1995; and
WNEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed the City
Administrator's Proposed 1996 Budget; and
WHEREAS, Council recagnixed that the Budget document was pre ared on
the basis o# a Pretiminary Levy which will be considered at public hearin � on
December 5. 1995. '
NOW THERE�ORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Cit}� of
Mendata Neights that the City Administrator`s Proposed 'f 996 Budget appropriates
expenditures in a manner consistent with service level needs and Preliminary Levy
funding; and _ I
BE iT FURTHER RESBLVED that Council h�reby adopts the Admini irator's
Proposed 1996 Budget dated as the Pretiminary Budget for 1996 subject to
amendment following budget and levy hearings and adoption of a final le .
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendata Heights this 'i 3th da� of
September, 1995.
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swansan
City Cterk
CiTY GOUNCtL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEI
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
RESOLUTION APPROVING TENTATIVE 1995 LEVY COLLECTIBLE I�V 1996
WHEREAS, the 1990 State Tax Law requires the City of Mendot�Heights to
certify a tentative Tax Levy for the year 1995 prior to September 20, 1 95; and
WHEREAS, the Levy may be adjusted prior to December 20, 199� to an
amount not to exceed the adopted tentative Levy.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council adopt
following tentative Levy for tax against all taxable property in the City
Heights for collection in the year 1996:
General Fund
Emergency Preparedness
Fire Relief
Infra Structure Reserve
Watershed District
Legal & Contingency Levy
Total General Levy
Subject to Limitation
Special Debt Levies
MWCC Sewer Debt
Equipment Certificates
Park Bonds
Improvement Bonds
Fr. Hills St. Bonds
Total ,
Total Tentative Levy
Anticipated HACA Aid
52,385,000
1,000
_ 22,000
30,000
-0-
60,000
52,498,000
30,000
106,000
320,000
17,400
30,000
S 503,400
$3,001,400
S 448,000
Net Tentative Levy Certified $2,553,400
Mendota
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Levy shall be amended
hearings to reflect the adopted City Budget.
budget
BE IT FURTNER RESOLVED that the City Counci! hold a public he ring on
Tuesday, December 5, 1995 at 7:30 o'ctock P.M. for the purpase of co sidering
the proposed budget and tevy with a second hearing to be held at 5.OQ 'cEock
P.M. on ' , December , 1995. -
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 13th d�y of
September, 1995,
�
ATTEST:
GETY C4UNC1�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEI
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
Kathteen M. Swanson _.
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL 1995 TAX LEVY FOR SPECIAL T�►XING
DISTRICT NO. 1 COLLECTIBLE IN 1996 �-
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights has, by Resolution No. 8-91,
authorized the levy of taxes within Special Tax District No. 1 for the pur � ose of
paying operating costs of the street lighting system established within s id
District; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights has determined that the sum of
S 15,000 will be required in 1996 for the purpose of paying such operatir�g costs.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the Ci'ty of
Mendota Heights adopt the following levy against all taxable property wi hin said
Special Taxing District No. 1.
Operation and Maintenance Costs S 15,000
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any tax exempt property with sai� District
be billed for services at a comparable rate computed on the Assessor's arket �
Value of such property. �
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby instructed� to
transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the Dakota County Auditor
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 13th day of
September, 1995. �
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIG
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
Frr�rr� : OL I N lJRQUGHT I ROh} SYSTE�1� PHONE No. : 612 454 0312 Sep,
TO: Tt?Tii Lt3WCl�
From: ]oan Olin
Regardiug: ACc]uisilitu� oi' tlte Bu�'row's T'tc�pe�'ly
September 5, 1995
Dettr Mayor and City Cauncil memhess,
I am anabl� ta att�nd innigM�ts racoting. 1 sti11 wish ta make a request re
aequisitic�n o!' €he Burrow's grvperiy. I reunt�y saw a copy c�f the petiti
ti�en circulatai through the commun�ty. T�llS �lilA11 W15 (S�'1V18115Iy h1AS
BCi�UlSittfJll.
1995 2:17P�3 P01
the
h�s
+ i0
I would like to tak� a��inutc to �int out a couple of examples. It stat that the
property is �+ act�es. tt did noi statc that S acres of the prop�rty is t;ased pt�n snd
can not be developed.
lt als+� S�Lc:s tlial payments for the prop criy would ceas� at the time of Mr. �urrow's
death. lt was my �n�lerscanding the .�.!'he �'ricnds af thc 13urn}w's F�rnz" wnuld take
over paym�;nt�. Ii' thls organuahvu fails, it h�►s aot yet b�n madc o1e�r s�s to �whom, if
anyonc, would resnme paym�nts.
The petiiion, also, does not state that if "Th� Friends af th�G Butrow� s Parm"
orgatizahan does cease �o exist, what future cvsts would he �assed on tc� the ta�c payers
for things svch as in.suranc:�, meild�nanc�, etc. Also, tbe council has n idea the
num�er of people that may hav� �dicl `NC}" lo the p�ctition.
With these things in minG, I�equest that the City �ouacii not wh�leh � 1y acccpt �
this p�tition was thc wishes of the citizens, but instead put f�rth an nbiesed
referendum to �1 the voters �f Mendata Height�. I uuc��t�d fihat thic c�u2d ccyst
between �1p,0�0 and $15,004. I co�slder tl�is a small amc�unt c;+�nsidcrin th� ciry
could be liable for $�04,{I{3�-i-. �
Ag�in, i�polagize fa� my nc�t i�ing aUle Lo attend th�e m+�tin�;. Thiti i��v w�s�r
dimmishes my passionate opposiiion to th� Cifiy's u�e e,r taxpaye�s money tn a�guire th�
Iiuirow's Progcrty.
Please feel free to read this letter for the minut�s if yau feel it ic
��ariudiy siga my namo to �his letter.
R�s ifully,
.��� ��� ~
..�_�
luu� otin
Mendata Hts., Mhl
And I --
1 1.
• i:il i i • 1:�
►�f:�u •
Mayor, City Council aad City Admini
7ames E. Danieisan, Public Works Direc
St, Pau1 Water Utiiity Agreement
August 29, 1.995�
Mendota Heights' contract for water service with St. Paul Water Utility e�
September 1982 and Mendota Heights ha.s been operating under the terms of that e
agreement ever since. This situation is not unusual, as several other of St. Pau1 W
Utilities' customer suburbs have aiso been operating this same way. Carrently St.
Utility desires to establish a new agreement with all the suburbs it serves. When ec
St. Paul Water Utility we indicated to them that hecause West St. Paul is "up streai
Mendata Heights that we desire that they fiin�alize an agreement with West St. Paul
that we would then cansider a similar one. St. Paul Water Utality finaiized an agre
West St. Paul in Febna�ary 1995. Upon being informed of West St. Paul's agreem
Mendata Heights City Council appointed the Mayor and Council Member Krebsba
force ta work with St. Faul Water Utility to finatize an agreement for presentation
Council.
Mayor Mertensotto and Council Member Krebsbach met with Mr. Bernie F
Pau2 Water Utility General 1�?Ianager, an May 12, 1995 to discuss the praposed agi
suggested some changes. The pmgosed new agreement which incorporated thase c
remains a twenty year agreement with a twenty gercent watex rate markup over St.
Resident's rates. The twenty percent water rate mark up is identical to that which
charged Mendota Heights custamers. This new contract is an improvement to the e
because it now provides fox Mendota Heights residents to receive all the same benE
residents receive. This is accomplished by adding the fallawing benefits:
l. Extendi.ng a 30 inch diameter water main to Charlton Road and �i
Avenue for added Mendota. �ieights water suppl.y. St. Pau1 Water
willing ta extend this water main fmm its 6MG reservoir in West
clasest Mendota Heights/'West St. Paul street intersection. Unfor
intersection is not a con�enient place for us to accept the water m
connection.
�
ul Water
�eted by
from
st and
►ent with
t, the
to a .task
the City
St.
:and
currently
sting one
ts St. Pau1
Lity is
Pau1 to the
tely, this
In the alternative, St. Paul Water Utility has agreed to extend the mai.a a snnilar
distance to the intersection of Charlon Road and Wentworth Avenue and we will
need to extend this 30 inch liae from Charlton Road along Wentworth Avenue
to Dodd Road in order to accomplish providing the needed water supply.
2. Guaranteeing all water service connections within the public Right-of-Way
(previously only Boazd installed services were guardnteed). .
3. Repairing the street where watermain breaks occur (previously Mendota
Heights' responsibility).
4. Maintain the 2MG water tower, subject to Mendota Heights being responsible
for removal of the remaining chromate contaminated paint, if and when such
removal becomes necessary in the future.
5. Mendota Heights retains the right to convert to a wholesale contract, however,
in order for St. Pau1 Water Utility to recapture some of their expenses
associated with extending the 30 inch main, such conversion could not occur for
a mini.mum of 15 years.
This contract is modeled after the West St. Paul contract, with some exceptions, ie, we
will conti.nue to complete our own sewer billings, and we do not have a pumping station for
St. Pau1 Water Utility to take over the maintenance, being the most significant differences.
: � ►�lul�!►II _ Y 1 ►
This contract is modeled after the West St. Paul contract, and now includes many new
benefits that were before only afforded St. Paul residents. I feel that the proposed contract is a
good one and I recommend its adoption.
Y � . : .� ll: 1
Review the attached contract (Mr. Bullert will attend the meeting to answer any
questions), and then if Council desires to implement the recommendation, pass a motion
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign it.
,
�� 4Jl(yl.l��'e.
�f `�i��i �, r�
' F BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
�t s � ' !
�� r �r'�. 1
T `�'P4U�.M .+.
Dino Guerin, President Janice Rettman, Vice President
Stephen Haselmann, Commissioner David Morris, Commrssioner Michael Harris,
August 8, 1995
Mr. James Danielson
City Engineer
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Danielson:
Enclosed please find the following:
1. A revised draft contract with the City of Mendota Heights dated
oner
1995.
You will note ten (10) changes from the previously submitted and revised con ct. The
changes, I believe, reflect our recent discussions regarding a wholesale contract, furnishing
data for sewer billing, tank painting responsibility, etc. The changes have been "shaded" for
your ease in reviewal.
1. Table of contents revised.
2. Article II, Section 9, Page 7- includes new language regarding o� tion
to convert to wholesale.
3. Article III, Section 1, Page 7- minor language added regarding c anges
and requirement to furnish as-builts and minor wording change. .
4. Article III, Section 2, Page 8- minor wording addition.
5. Article III, Section 4, Page 9- language defines responsibilities f r supply
main to Mendota Heights.
6. Article IV, Section 3, Page 13 - language defines conditions reg ding
elevated tank maintenance. Ianguage added regarding control of ystem
operation.
7. Article IV, Section 6, Page 14 - language added regarding extran us
water use.
8. Article V, Section 3, Page 15 - language added regarding surchar e
fee collection.
9. Article V, Section 4, Page 16 - new language regarding the furnis ' g
of data for sewer billing.
10. Attachment No. 2 and Exhibit A- regarding elevated tank mainte ance.
SAINT PAUL WATER UTILITY
Suite 200 8 4TH ST E Saint Paul, MN 55101-1007
Customer Service Tel (612) 266 - 6350 Fax (612) 292 - 7537
Bernie R. Bu!lert, General Monager Roger A. Mohror, Cen�ra! Services Manager
Jumes L. Huugen, Production Manager James M. Graupmann, Distribution
Mr. 7ames I}anielson
August 8, 1995
Page 2
I believe the Ianguage added shauld brirtg the contract inta agreement with our negotiations.
If possible I would hope that a final contract could be submitted to my Board for approval at
the September i l, 2995 meeting.
After you have had an appartunity ta review these changes, please call me at 266-b274.
Very truly yours,
�.,.t�vYu.<... P
Bernie R. Bullert � �� 1
General Manager
RAM/na
Attachment: Draft Contract (revised)
cc: Roger A. Mohrar
Reprinted
August 8,
CONTRACT FOR WATER SERVICE
BETWEEN THE
BOARD OF WATER COMI��IISSIONERS OF 1'I� CITY OF SAINT P�
AND THE
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
August, 1995
1995
ARTICLE I.
Section 1.
Section 2.
Section 3.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TERM OF CONTRACT/GIIVERAL PROVISIONS 1
Term of Contract • 1
Termination for Default 2
Indemnification 2
ARTICLE II. WATER SIItVICE 3
Section 1. Boazd to Furnish Water 3
Section 2. Water Quality 4
Section 3. Use of Supplemental Water Supply 4
Section 4. Future Quality Standards 4
Section 5. Rules and Regulations 5
Secfion 6. Board's 7urisdiction in Mendota Heights 6
Section 7. Storage Facilities 6
Section 8. ' Future Operating Characteristics 6
��{};.;y •• .a.�xµ:[,`. ;,,,....;;.+..w,�t;;mv,s?£:a;r�:o:;:,y.;¢;���,•,,yM1•,�A; �acc<Oc:=T.+uCca1roar.�;;.ro{��ct,;� u�:+.,K•.,.:wco+.fC.�'^�i�v;...v44,��, ,...;<:.`''.,;:'�.;•`:�•`•:f?�;.•",'."••5::3:v:::'•°;°:.,;u";•
C51 �'�� {�ii4i� .iAwJini�:•}M' '�iv(BY•�•'.•�+•�'•}+�i<inhi4.x:'T/M ri�uVS �RK�,M���'LA�^W�L�i'K�i$rv��'L��ifLiii{ti�JCiii{iiiiiA�ti.�'�WriW�SK�'wtittin�SiL.': vWAntiittfn'SrTn{iii{{4:�itiKf��
ARTICLE III. MII�IDOTA HIIGHTS WATER SYSTEM 7
Section 1. Mains Constructed by Mendota Heights 7
Section 2. Standards 8
Section 3. Right�f-Way Changes 9
..�,yx, �:k".7; n�:fixeSe. 'yroo5u:'�'?u:Jc'.. v.ae•Kc ...W�.„�,y�..,,attoa..•x;x:h'.�.'•:�rcuv.a:�<;k;x�r<!�sC"a:'x?�t�!'r�;:�xu.�;:c,a.��cu.,,
}�. f ,.'��,. �, y� .t �t ,.�ct s 4•.'>ry,:•:;�•� ,.;;:r.; r .
k���,`.�:�:F;'.`tYr.�2:�::��:,�:,�;4>ii�:::.<?.::' . .:J'•`•'' �;. ...: B�?w���r:�.:. '.'.�,.<i:k rN'*,.,`�''�i:tt�):S,yfi:;S?�'`•i:,•'.<\?;j.,.'t . •+�, .
• .: .... . � ..
k.:cv,a�.... . .. ....:..:.�. . .: . :' ' )r�aa.Fsxuarsr:��w:3>if.G`'.:•:.:t :.::.:::. ....::
Secfion 5. Service Connections-Installed by Boazd , 9
Sectioa 6. Service Connection Guazantee by Board 10
Sectioa 7. Piping, Fixtures, Etc. 10
Section 8. Extensions of the System 11
Section 9. Joint Use of the System 11
Section 10. Independent System � 11
Section 11. Right to Inspect 12
ARTICLE IV. BOARD TO MAIIVTAIN WATERWORKS 12
Section 1. Waterworks Defined 12
Section 2. Board to Maintain System � 12
Section 3. Boazd's Option to Maintain or Replace 13
Section 4. New Mains/Maintenance by Board 13
Section 5. Boazd's Right to use of Streets 14
�y �� . ;Y.H,.;.'i4'l,.?i](:{;G'��:' fii...'^�P:CH�^4.i,y}T�' Y4. L}:;`Y.,+.•:MYlY :}:}v.^.'.^':ii:p;ti;nr!SWMp�,J'ri'}vi.{:?�C�:?N.'i'�
� �'.^ri��:�?:�li;,i ..}::tiv.\,'•:; :.,,..�,.,,�.,..NM1,.,�,.�,/.,,�}rrr�::{.�r:'ti .t�.,;;°?��,`.t£+.'i:ii}ji:;:,}.i.:;i;:j+.i�C?�'.�:tit:{;:;i::i;:;:'t•'i:}t;:::.ti�:
k?.�.�Q :a. • . . .
�c ,:...�: 6:�::,.. . .� ..>.,;:::,�...<..:v.;.;:.�....�..'"'° �{G��,..h. .. ��:.��.M,..;A:...,.. " �{;. : �>,...:::..��;� t;:;,r,
a,,�wa�,...ar?�.+s,:<aao-.�sa.F.x.N....s�...a,a,a�,z�s>zA:rasa�.��xc;a�xc`r,.s:.�aw,.:.:�.;.w;V,,,.:.r�..EE;�:. N.:x�;.�.^xs;::;�..:,., .
ARITCLE V. METERS AND RELATED SERVICES 15
Section 1. Boazd to Furnish Meters 15
Section 2. Billing and Collection 15
Section 3. Optional Billing and Collection Services 15
.«.��:.�>�r . �,�c�,;�:�,w •:.w:��:,,,:�,�,.r:.:�zx:.. .,�„v : � ���;;:� ...::.�. .;.,:�f.
� �l�4�:.:�"�'�::�::: •..:.::>:.;t;.:<�<;��t�i�' .b�v�.�"�°�"`f`Qr�: .�..' .�' <::}4:.,` :�.:•,•. ;;.}�:> • ::?ti.,:.::>,.::':::3L�
.
.... :, .. . z,�r. � .:<::N :: .:.::.:... ... ....... <.....� ::.: .: .
. .. ...:
,..,.:
:.... .. ..... ,,,,,.rv,,.., ...... ... .... ................ .:..<: . ........ .:... .. ....� .. ........... . �..::.:.:.-...::: ;�,„�;;�,,,.
ARTiCI.E VI. WATER RATES 16
Section 1. Consumption Rates 16
ARTICLE VII. PROTECTION SERVICE AND HYDRANT USE
Section 1. Hydrants
Section 2. Inspection of Hydrants
Section 3. Painting of Hydrants
Section 4. Hydrant Nozzle Threads
16
16
17
17
17
ARTICLE VIII. EFFECITVE DATE OF AGREEMENT 18
CONTRACT FOR WATER SERVICE
between the
BOARD OF WATER CONIlVIISSIONERS OF SAINT PAUL,
and the
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
This contract, made and entered into this day of
n
1995• by and between the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of aint Paul,
a municipal utility located in Ramsey County, Minnesota, hereinafter called the
"BOARD" or "WATER UTILITY" and the City of Mendota Heights, municipal
corporation located in Dakota County, Minnesota, hereinafter called "MENDOTA
HEIGHTS".
V'VITNT5SETH:
That the said parties, in consideration of the mutual covenants and
hereinafter set forth, have agreed to and with each other as follows:
ARTICLE I
TERM OF CONTRACT/GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 1. Term of Contract
This Contract shall be for an initial term of twenty (20) years
the day of � , 19 and terminating on the
on
day of , 2015z unless terminated earlier as hereinafte� provided.
It is expressly understood that this Contract may be extended for an addi 'onal term
of twenty (20) years by the written consent of both parties. This Contra t may be
1
� Y
terminated for default, or may be cancelled by either party if laws are enacted by
the State of Minnesota or the United States of America which substantially and
adversely affect rights, duties, or obligations of either party under this Contract.
Section 2. Termination for Default
Either Mendota Heights or the Board shall have the right to terminate this
agreement in the event that the other party fails to comply with any of the terms
and conditions of this agreement. An act of default shall include failure to pay charges
lawfully due the Board under the terms of this agreement and the Board shall have
the right to terminate water service. Termination of this agreement and/or water service
may occur only after written notice setting forth the act(s) of default has been
submitted to the other party, and the defaulting party shall have a reasonable
opportunity to correct any condition which is cited as cause for termination of the
agreement and/or water service. Notice of default shall be in writing by certified mail
to the parties at the following addressees: �
Mendota Heights Ci Manage ��m �� � s T�'�" �° 2
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118
General Manager
Board of Water Commissioners
8 East Fourth Street - 4th Floor
Commerce Building
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101-1007
Section 3. Indemnification
Mendota Heights covenants and agrees to indemnify, save harmless, and
defend the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul, the City of
2
Saint Paul and any or all of their agents, employees and servants, from
claims arising from or that may be claimed to arise from the operation, �
repair or existence of Mendota Heights' water system except those occurrin;
of the Board's negligence.
ARTICLE II
WATER SERVICE
Section 1. Board to �i.irnish Water
Subject to the terms, conditions and provisions of this contract,
agrees to furnish the water requirements of Mendota I3eights and its
domestic, commercial, and fire protection purposes under normal static �
mains at the points of connection with Mendota Heights. It is understood
however, that the Board undertakes to supply such water only in case �
in its mains is sufficient to enable it so to do, and the Board ;
responsibility for failure to supply water resulting from acts or conditions
control.
It is agreed by and between the parties hereto that the terms,
and all
; by reason
the Board
sidents for
sure in its
d agreed,
e pressure
�ssumes no
beyond its
�visions and
conditions outlined in this agreement shall be applicable only as between the parties
hereto and shall not afford to consumers within Mendota Heights an, rights or
interests hereunder.
3
Section 2. Water Quality
The quality of water furnished to Mendota Heights shall be the same treated
water supplied by the Board to its other consumers and shall meet State Health
Department standards.
Section 3. Use of Supplemental Water Supply
No supplemental supply of water shall be connected to the Mendota Heights'
water system being served by the Board without the prior approval of the Board.
This agreement shall not preclude Mendota Heights from establishing a portion
of its water system to be supplied from any source approved by the Minnesota
Department of Health in areas where water supply from the Board is impractical or
unworkable, or in such cases where a central water supply system may be constructed
. and installed for a housing development prior to the time that water mains supplying
the area with water purchased from the Board can be extended. However, in no case
shall there be direct connections between the Board's supply system and other supplies,
and when the Board's supply system is practical and workable, the other supply shall
be discontinued.
Section 4. �ture Quality Standards
To promote and provide quality water for Mendota Heights and the Board's
service area, both parties recognize the need for the operation and maintenance of all
existing water facilities, and that the construction, operation and maintenance of future
water facilities may be required by the Board or Mendota Heights to meet present and
future primary water quality standazds and any secondary water quality standazds
n
W
deemed necessary or desirable by the Board and that such facilities are
interest of both parties.
No unreasonable or unnecessary regulation, permit fee or time
imposed upon either party by the other party which would limit or
construction, operation and maintenance of any water facility required
compliance with any water quality standazd mentioned above.
Section 5. Rules And Regulations
Mendota Heights further agrees that the use and distribution oi
Mendota Heights, derived from the supply furnished from the Board, shall
be governed by rules, regulations, policies, and conditions which the
heretofore adopted for the City of Saint Paul, or which it may
said city concerning the preservation, regulation and protection of its
n the best
y shall be
restrict the
to assure
` water in
at all times
Board has
• adopt for
�ter supply,
including water waste, water conservation, sprinkling restrictions and water � use for air
conditioning equipment; and as more fully detailed in Board of Water
Water Code dated February 1, 1995 and Saint Paul Water Utility S
Installation of Water Mains dated July 1992, or latest versions thereof.
Mendota Heights agrees to enact such rules, regulations, policies,
into ordinances and make them legally effective and binding within si
1.
dards for
conditions
(60) days
after the execution of this contract, and to enact any amendments thereto � adopted by
the Board within sixty (60) days after being notified of such adoption,
suitable penalties for the violation of rules, regulations, policies and
to strictly enforce such rules, regulations and requirements.
�
to adopt
, and
Section 6. Board's Jurisdiction in Mendota Heights
It is further agreed that the Board, through its officers, agents and employees,
shall have the same authority and jurisdiction in the enforcement of such rules and
regulations in Mendota. Heights that the Board has in the City of Saint Paul. Further,
Mendota Heights agrees that when complaint is made to it by any of the officers,
agents or employees of the Board of a violation of the aforesaid rules and regulations,
it will take immediate and effective steps to prevent the further violations of such
rules and regulations and punish the violators thereof, and that Mendota Heights will
make it the duty of its attorney to prosecute any violations of such rules, regulations
and ordinances upon complaint being made of the violation thereof by the Board or
by any of its officers, agents or employees.
Section 7. Storage Facilities
For areas in Mendota Heights where Mendota Heights desires greater water
pressure than that provided by the Board's West Side Booster Service, Mendota
Heights at its own expense, shall construct storage facilities to meet peak hourly
demands and pumping facilities -to supply water to said storage facilities all in
accordance with acceptable water industry standards. Additional connections to the
Board's system shall be subject to Board approval shall not be azbitrarily withheld.
Section 8. �ture Operating Characteristics
Mendota Heights may desire to change the operating characteristic of its water
system from time to time and may request different or additional connections to the
Board's system. In that event, Mendota Heights shall pay all costs associated with
�
�
providing the required additional facilities. Additional connections to the
shall be subject to Board approval and such approval shall not be arbi
S�i'a'i��::��:: :ri:: N: .;:��idi:���s��;ri�`::T�>�:�ii:+i�� <.. ��
....� ...�..K.,�....... ..A�;«:::��,�;::v»r::<;<:N:.<.<.,�.�..�.....,,..v.n,h.w...,..
�
ARTICLE III
MENDOTA HEIGHTS WATER SYSTEM
Section 1. Mains Constructed by Mendota Heights
Mendota Heights agrees to construct or have installed, at its ov
adequate and suitable water mains and appurtenance adequate for the di;
said water within the corporate limits of Mendota Heights in accoi
�,.:.
specifications and standards �� the Board. Plans of all extensions to tl
Heights' system connecting � the Board's water supply shall be submitted i
to the Board before advertising for bids, the awarding of contracts
construction is begun.
7
�d's system
� withheld.
expense,
ution of
ce with
Mendota
approval
l actual
The initial water system and any improvements necessary to provide adequate
water service for the citizens within Mendota Heights shall be considered development
costs necessary to providing water service and these services shall be provided by
Mendota Heights at no expense to the Board. It is further recognized that the water
main replacement program adopted by Mendota Heights is an important system
management method. The Board shall identify water mains that have a history of
maintenance problems and �shall notify Mendota Heights where analysis indicates said
main replacement is the best cost-effective alternative (replacement policy as shown on
Attachment No. 1). Water main replacement shall be considered a Mendota Heights
system Capital Improvement and the resgonsibility of Mendota Heights. Water main
replacement shall be carried out in a reasonable amount of time and as soon as is
practical.
,
Section 2. Standards
Water mains, appurtenances, services and connections shall be of the same lcind
of materials and constructed in the same manner and under the same standards, rules
and regulations as are now in effect or as may hereinafter be prescribed by the
Board for similar installations in the City of Saint Paul
'��:v<i�i:v:S�:: tif.?Fh]d'AM'.j-0Cfi'M:+�V'?C!{T+,GM+'�C^C{SS•••�{h:{:.M44
C:����z�.�:....�.,.�.��..���,s: �:;,�.;�;;:�i�>�� or under standards acceptable to the Board.
:
A review of the Board's standards, rules, regulations, policies
as they relate to Mendota Heights shall be held with representatives
Mendota Heights and the Board. Either party may request a review and ,
shall be scheduled at a time and place agreeable to both parties.
Section 3. Right of-Way Changes
Any and all expenses or costs accruing to the water supply system
conditions
from both
a meeting
Mendota
Heights in connection with the maintenance, reconstruction, overlaying or� paving of
public streets, alleys or rights-of-way due to change of grade on such
rights-of-way or any other change resulting from action of Mendota.
of Dakota or State of Minnesota as such changes affect mains,
appurtenances within Mendota Heights shall be the responsibility of
..,.�.w.,.v.....,,v.,�,:;>�r.: ::,,.,,..>.,.v<.v::�: :�.»::.>.:::::> :...:.,,:; ..;..,...;;;;<,,,;.::; ::::.}:<:�:��;:�»:::::>,:;:..>,:.<,,..v..
:-?tb>`� ' :'.:�ii�::::�>�:�>� � x�i�e�:''�� `:1:����'<`�:9�'7��
�:�::<;����<::�:��;�.�; :.:::: .:.:::.�� . .. �.::::::....... �::.>:..:::::.::..:::..
>:;: : : : : : : :: :: :: : . . . . . . . . . � .::.: : : . :.. . . : : .: : : : : : : : : : . .: : :�.: . : .: : . : : . : : : . : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 5. Service Connections-Installed by Board
It is agreed that all service connections from the main to the
be installed by the Board under rules identical with those in effect in
Saint Paul or as may hereafter be morlified by the Board. The charges for
�
, alleys,
County
ces and
Heights.
line shall
ciry of
service
connections shall be in accc�rdance with the schedule of charges established from iima
to time by the Board for customers outside city limits of Saint Paul, provided,
however, that the Boazd shall not charge Nlendata �ieights' customers more than the
charges made to any customer in Saint Paui for like service. New applications for
water service connections sha�l be made to and through the Board, and each applicant
shall furnish the Board a certified street acidress established by Mendota Heights.
Sectian 6. Service Connection Guarantee by Board
Z'he Board u�ill, without exgense ia Mendota Heights ar the owner, make all
necess��ry repairs and maintenance to that part of #he service connect�o�acated wit��n }_-
the public street right-of-way, under rules identicai with thase in effect in the City
of Saint Paul. This shall apply io al1 existing artd future service connections
.• constnzcted ta Saint Paul standards. Service connections from private mains ar a
system nat served by the Board's water supply shall nat be guaranteed.
Section 7. Pipirzg, Fixiure, E�c. � .
Mendota Heights shall, by the enactment of suitable rules, regulations ar
ordinances, zequire that ali interior piping, fixtures, accessories, or on premises piping
in any manner connected to the public water system supplied by the Boazd, shall be
of the same materials, installed in the same manner and me�t the same standards as
are required for the same ar simi2ar work in the City of Sa,int Pau1.
Section 8. Extensions of the System
It is agreed that Mendota Fieights shall make no extensions to its
system beyond the corporation limits of Mendota Heights without the writt
of the Board.
Section 9. Joint Use of the System
Mendota Heights agrees to permit the Board to make connections �
joint use of the water system owned by Mendota Heights as may be
extensions beyond the corporate limits of Mendota Heights if deemed
desirable by the Board and not detrimental to the supply within Mendota F
Board shall pay Mendota Heights for any such use and the amount of st
shall be negotiated by the parties.
Section 10. Independent System �
The Board may in the future desire to extend water service to n
beyond the corporate limits of Mendota Heights by means of an entirely ;
non-interconnecting water main or mains. If such separate system is deeme�
Mendota Heights shall allow the Board to construct the mains within Mend�
right-of-way provided that the routing of the mains shall be coordinated w
Heights' City Engineer and approved by the Mendota Heights' City Cot
approval shall not be arbitrarily withheld. It is mutually understood that
�
11
distribution
approval
► and have
;quired for
;asible and
�ights. The
;h payment
nicipalities
�arate and
necessary,
� �ieights'
� Mendota
;il, which
� Board ,
shall be responsible for all costs associated with the construction of the mains,
including the design, construction, street restoration and future maintenance of the
mains. The Boazd shall reimburse Mendota Heights for staff time and expenses
incurred for plan review, and inspection deemed necessary by Mendota Heights.
Section 11. Right to Inspect
The Board, through its officers, agents and employees, shall have the right at
all times to examine, inspect and test any materials or workmanship used or to be
used in connection with the waterworks system of Mendota Heights and supplied with
water by the Board or connections thereto, for the purpose of determining whether
or not they comply with the foregoing provisions, and shall have the right to examine
and inspect the materials and workmanship and method of installation of house
_ plumbing connecting with said waterworks system for the same purpose.
ARTICLE IV
BOARD TO MAINTAIN WATERWORKS
Section 1. Waterworks Defined
Waterworks shall be defined in this contract to include booster pump stations,
water storage tanks, distribution mains, service connections, fire hydrants, valves, water
meter systems and related appurtenances.
Section 2. Board to Maintain System
Except as hereinafter provided, the Board agrees to maintain and make necessary
repairs to the waterworks system of Mendota Heights supplied with water by the
Board, to keep the same in proper repair and condition to prevent any waste of
12
water, and Mendota Heights, further agrees that the Board may make �
repairs to the waterworks system of Mendota Heights, and the
maintenance, including street repair shall be at the sole expense of the
Section 3. Board's Option to Maintain or Replace
The Board may elect to replace, within Mendota Heights, any
service connection and water metering system where the cost of
existing facility exceeds the cost of replacement. The same standards
within the City of Saint Paul shall be used by Board within Mendota
emergency
of such
hydrant,
ang the
h apply
i�hts to
determine whether replacement is justified. Replacement of baoster pumps, �controls,
pump stations, tanks and distribution mains, etc. owned by Mendota
considered capital improvements and are all the responsibility of Mendota
Section 4. New Mains/Maintenance by Board
It is further agreed by and between the parties to this agreement
Mendota Heights constructs or contracts for the construction of new
and appurtenances to be connected to the system and supplied with
Board pursuant to the terms, conditions, and provisions of this agreement,
13
shall be
:hat where
I>, services
�r by the
that the
Board shall not be resgansible for the maintenance ar repairs to sueh newly
constxucted additions to the water supply system until ane year from the date the
same have been placed in operation, or until the Board has notified Mendota Heights
in writing of the acceptance af such installation, whichever date is earlier.
Section S. Baard's Right io Use of Streets
Mendota Heights does hereby grant the Board free and uninterrupted use of all
streets, parkways, alleys or public easements witi�in Mendota �Ieights as may be
reasanably necessary far use by the Baard in maintenance or repairs of the water
system wit�iin the carporate limits of Mendota I3eights.
Mendota Heights also agrees that its departments will to the fuliest extent
possi6le assist the Baard in the pratectian of �he existing water system and will
. cooperate with the Board in pratecting barricades, stored � materials, traff c rautings, etc.
that may be necessary ta maintenance or repaix work performed by the Boazd ta said
system.
�.�..: � x;. �::;:::�.- -�;�.... .,f
. �;>;'..�;��.:��:,ti���'{.���,�±
::;.�,'r . . .a:�:c;r�ucaab'�x;.:ars:o�o:•rxu:as....
��y"�.4• :`•: ' an�,^".!v`>y;;..;..--: :{sr.?.4y.;.^2.,c�;ra}..xtor?�ct��;..., .,ksas,x;�:s3�r:�*,,x.�,��,y��.,:. • r� • ^^nrr>.:n:as . �., . nsr-?�x:t� .n>t:.�+yns;aqaca:c;,•v..a:.;c:.s��x.v7.,yxr.:�.xn
..:� �:;��N���.���i�+,:�� „�`�:� •�,�Y::��� ;�::�e��:'•.�����>'s�`� �:����::�`��5��:�< . '.���:1���'j ?:��� �
{ . , {�:
' �' � "� �'�6faVa�&:oSOCG1043�WCiiC&:.C\������s5:�.. �. r .... . ;...} . . . .. . x.. ... .�r . .. . .... ..... : . �'.. ...��'Ti�v'�'A'C.O�O�o��
'�q>»:!,o!+.vt?a}ae;s:.,�+....'}�^s�mn�e,;.,w,:, . .; •'v,+.tpr?ro?{got 3^:...,rk.;���.. .`�e„cv.!.�Y.•;"•".. ,,.,,y,�„�,,. .n�,,,y.. . . , . �,,..a..�,,,.. ;y.;.,^4,r ,
'.:.� '. .. � ''':�..�4«�`..�� . .... �;��t. . �.�'. r::��;.�:�$ ::ii:�.:��:?���: � �:.:.�5�--�i�3k�:. <::��k:?�.�``a.'.::��E��E�#�:>�3,�::=��:<��` '
�:,: . . . : ...... ......: . . ....,..... . ..; .�� ........: .. ..... . . ..... �i'V.i��
•,�«�,�.,�.�;;�«,.��.k ... , ............... ........, ....... .......,.............. ..
. . . .... �
��.��:�w.. , c:�.�,�,,:s�:««o:��� :�,� .�.w,:�z
�.-�;�•�::.:..:.�::��::..YxY,s.....h,. , r..l,. -r;n,: � r{. ..,M �.,:;<..... .
� '��8::>:��:::����:�::�Cf�`:::��?t:��z:�.� �;� �
':t�`�N:�k:�•.+;fi;:•,;sx::s:;:;wa:N::ta::ikM;<s>x,`.,�.v:o-'.:::t:2<�::x.•':r: rx:witY�::�:;�:..•x::s
2�
ARTICLE V
METERS AND RELATED SERVICES
Section 1. Board to �iurnish Meters
The Board shall furnish, install and retain tifle to all customers'
full responsibility for maintenance of same in accordance with rules and
in effect in City of Saint Paul.
Section 2. Billing and Collection
The Board shall assume full resgonsibility for reading meters,
collection of accounts.
Section 3. Optional Billing and Collection Services
The Board may provide billing and collection services for c
performed by Mendota Heights (for example; sewer, storm water, :
refuse) if Mendota Heights desires such services from the Board. Such
be provided only for properties being provided with water service by
15
neters with
regulations
and
functions
r�e; and
:.. �
shall
�;�� Mendota Heights �� pay costs relative to the programming and set-up costs
s:,K..
necessary to implement the optional billing and collection system for which Mendota
Heights will pay the Board a monthly payment to be agreed upon by the parties hereto.
�� 1'he Board will send a monthly payment to Mendota Heights equal to the
amount of collections received during the month (less the agreed upon collection
charge).
+��4N{('�%'1At{;:fiM1?vi'::Y.,'.y%:?ii6.'�$i`:.�r'W.y.v.{:i}w.,v,..n�.}:•:i:'1.f,.::;3;:!...;:iMi'!R�.��j��'•Y•�r�N{v.r..yS:�:::+✓::i:Y,.!i� i•i:•'+C
�e���:;:�:�<A;:;;«::��n�i�i�i . >: �n:;�at�:}:�`�::��:e�::::.: :�i�iii �
� . . ... . . � � . : ..:..:
.�:,:�:�«.�.,�,�,.,,��:.:��.�„�,�.�.,�.�:��:��,.��,.�
\..x,v„v,.;,;.•.:ryx.a. 'Cy..'-:i�'SC' • "�YRL "�A})i':;:i`..'•w.�t':.. M^'..•:•�;;?ccr7.Mvwn,�y+�k�'�•�v,r• _�..^•.�iYry.P'.;C4}. fy,��;v,"px::y:�Y�x}y::^i;9t¢:C�.�,{r»eyW.xy. , nv.+.}. �y�;rnv.rrctinr..,,�,y,..y�m.
.. ..�.,. • ••:ax: p �••: } y "'•.;i:i.�•:y.,;<:.. �ey /;jy�
:;<�Y.;4±,?f;,.t.,�';: �: �;:•: : k?':<. .:?': .:fA�:'.�::�.'tF�'wl�feFkii4'.•1i3.'4t.GA�:�%:�.'.�::�`<:C:�'I:>�;�,� ..'���."'FR�F;�SiAi•
. :.,. , . : ,
::,:, ,...�i�.�<���.::��... � ':: � � �.:�3?t�,?Ck � ��>'t�
' .:>::: . � :�>-.;
. .....:.:... . .� . . : <.,;;.,� . � �a;;;���;�,�
, .: . , .. . . . �� ��„+,.,�.,
tiArn•nJv.'L{yi%:hY' �'' OiJNY�iriri4:{Liy'�`SWPVti�k1 • • •: •4]iCti3: ,L9W. AGG�k+'�`t0.Wk{PW.\�kWA.' n�Yk••••••�.+'tii� M4:YiaC4:'v`.FiJCS'+W4tt{W�j00LL4'vG'v • `•• • ••• •.
.....•.vy,. „K.;•K:r':o2»•'.2�^' +r,::Z�C%,,y"yo„"""� ;•�'n`�y4 : ...v�.:,:,�; •uxcr >+++ .,;�..y,,,,,y�,�,,...:•:ca::'^•-• • , :�su•:c�:' ,�na:^;;Y' •,r.:..�'�`�':��,x:e<o;t�o: .
��1;��s?;:�#:���<:�!€�>x � : : : : �`�;:�s E�:.�.���1�:�>���:�<:�°��a�.� ��"`�::;:;:�7;�:v:: � �: :'>�:��:<.. . .�� �:
� .
.��:s�� �
¢}}?}r^l,:PN%S45C'^+}XjY.!Av!!{�N 7k�tiMC•T}A'?; ?�:d?' �Y:^:+¢):-iv:� iih:� t\:'�t+� '?`?N^•?v'`y,AO:$^v;•,W.,.+^„M.,?,'`0:4�:{h:+?}:�¢JG}:.:{i?i<tMi}:{.�.,i�... .:;T:y,.IX^fl.l^]C;:?Y/A'� TSC{�}:i?,N. 'AYf.:{�'!CL`<i�;'}W^K
jfy \. •• :• � : .:i \ k'` : ti\�.;.:.; :: .
•.{• : � � �:};, a, �; �; : �y(��i ��j.�
h.v � ", 'ti:' . • . y1� ;.�' : Q}� �y.
{..:. � . . . : : ' : ? f�. . � �•i: . 2::i�'. � iit . '. ': . . i: v:.;C$.r. � x:.lf.}•>i'��` i�$:: :kt�I:� : i :;' '►l!�I!�i,•'•,: :��• �'��L1�iih
�..r.4i1F��i����'.'��.�'>•�lAF.��;{�/.A•:� ��n wmww�v.vn�.w�v.�0.1Vn� �M��iiv.`\��0.GSih\hV�i�ihv,MntLbFnv.{JJ���%L4:«
... ' :.u: .. . !
.. • .:.... .. .::...: . :xii:._n?tiJT:.. .::ri.titi..w:?i:Si.:kkv::in�.
. �v.
kJ�uL��F�iw�i�6:�i:4T%i:4�n. �4�4.Z1V�%in' :.:: � : ....:: � � �: •::: . ...; .; . ... �: n; ..:: v:: - � ��::: • • �
. .y,wxv.w•F4*�:•]:O'•:••:f..' .... "•F?:?�:.Y.:�. ri{�I.•:?".:.1.!:.MC6:4"}}:{!.:.S.W.MfMY:."?ri•i}}��y,x�•r�x`{.;x{!!?U.{n;e«:r•;rr{{.:'%+,:;:S;f,.?/,.?:.r{r�x�;♦/,♦,n:n,;{�,A,u;�n:?S;:!ill�Y,r,:f{.:rryf.N:�•;.v.v,x,.,v,?tix;,x{M{C
�Y '�$h'y:v+{!. •. :.i..: .; .}.. .�. . . . ��..^v..'�,.�t4.. ;. .... .: {... ..
:: ��€ �.��::>�a:�:::r'��::`::a����'.'����:>:�i�e��::,;�.�.:�,<:���`::�n:u�::::. . ���n:t� � .:�n.�i�as� �'. �...�:<
...... � .......................:: .:: :.:.::::::.::.::::.:::.�.�::::.::.::.::..<........,..::::: :.:.._ :..�:.:.:: . ..........:......
�<::::<.:�wri;��,;:.::.::.::<.:��;,.��,..,�..�.r�,,,..�.....�..:.�:.�....::N._:���x«v.: w��h�::..�.,.,..::�.: �hu::::::�r..v..:N......:..::>:..:�.�.r:v:..F�;fr�<:<�:::.;:K:.:�� ri>;:<.;h..:.,<.�::;;:.:::<.::<;.::<:>;:.::.:;:::..
ivnv�. ..r. ..�..nvnw.v: ..4ti.. . ......"...+ .. v+�. ... vvxv x r.�......... .: �. t.. �4... ..... v+�� 'i?+y� '::? i}}:..t...:.J.v:: .,�,; ...: • •: w.}\.}i::......:;
.::.;v\;.. \;...;.....;fF.:.i.`•���r'•::��••;,}Y':rrj.v...±x:•v?v�S;••:N^,.�'•.}••:i:.;i��::ti::vn•.rr•::f�::';'�4•::':"'`:.::}:':....::. ..i:•::::•.
�r#:::.�: `"��`:�`�sa;���A� :.��!���: :�ffx�: fi • .�€:; .�;��::�:;� . �:�:C��:�:::�fi:<��#;��::<��i i�.��:�
. . >...:::. .................. ..,..::._::...........::...:....:.. .
... �: �...
�:K;,�.Kw«:w::�„�.ri:.;;,;,;�;:��;::m.�.�,..,..<;.;.::�,�.....,:;,:.;s,,::�:<::s;:<..::;:.,,:<;;::::::;;:>�.�;>.w::x«:��::.:::.::<::<�::.:<.>:<.:;.:::,,,:;..�,:T;:;�:v;;:<;.N;;::.:<>::,:;�:.<::::�:.
ARTICLE VI
WATER RATES
Section 1. Consumption Rates
The charges and rates to Mendota Heights' consumers shall be those water rates
charged within the City of Saint Paul multiplied by a factor of 1.20. Surchazge rates
charged to Saint Paul customers shall not be considered in determining water rates for
consumers in Mendota Heights. The multiplier shall be applied to the current and any
future water rate structure which the Board of Water Commissioners adopts and is
approved by the City Council of the City of Saint Paul.
16
ARTICLE VII
PROTECTION SERVICE AND HYDRANT USE
Section 1. Hydrants
Hydrant use for purposes other than fire fighting by Mendota H
subject to the same rules and regulations applied by the Board in the
Paul.
Section 2. Inspection of Hydrants
An annual inspection of all hydrants located in Mendota Heigr
conducted by Board crews. Repair and maintenance work required on
Mendota Heights will be conducted in the same manner as work condu
City of Saint Paul.
Section 3. Painting of Hydrants
The City of Mendota Heights will paint the hydrants in Mendota
shall do so in accordance with the Board's established schedule for st
Mendota Heights standards. Mendota Heights may use a hydrant � cap
distinguish dead end mains, circulating mains and selected criteria. -
Section 4. Hydrant Nozzle Threads
Mendota Heights may also select a standard for hydrant nozzle
than the Saint Paul standard thread, and the Board will recognize and
desired thread.
17
shall be
of Saint
in
in the
and
work and
code to
other
the
ARTICLE VIII
EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT
This agreement shall not be binding until it has been accepted by resolutions
of the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul, the Council of the
City of Saint Paul, and the Council of the City of Mendota Heights.
IN WITNESS V'VHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to
be executed as of the day and year first above written.
. General Manager
Assistant City Attorney
City Attorney
BOARD OF WATER COMIVIISSIONERS
OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL
By
Its President
By
Its Secretary
By
D'uector, Department of Finance and
Management Services
THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Its Mayor
By
Its City Clerk
18
MAIN REPLAC�.'MIIVT CRITERIA 6/13/95
In accordance with AW WA Guidance Manual "Water Main Evaluation for Rehabilitation/Replacement" an� construction
cost estimates, the Saint Paul Water Utility has adopted main replacement criteria as set forth below.
Using average construction and repair costs a main break frequency factor is caiculated at which it becomes ost-effective
to replace a main rather thaa continue to repair the main. This criteria is illustrated ia calculations below. Restoration
by Water Utility will mean that the Utility did its own excavation and street restoration. Restora6on by oth rs will mean
that the Utility contracted the excavation work and street restoration was done through a project at no cost to the Utility.
Additional evaluation criteria: main break data reviewed annually with main(s) added to list (if nece
paved streets are given exemption for five years; aad on questionable mains the Utility will do coupon
corrosion and/or soils testing to determine soil corrosiveness.
The follbwing criteria is used to calculate this frequency factor:
length of main segment - 60U feet
useful life of C.I. main - 70 years
length of study - 10 years
frequency factor = number of breaks/600 feedl0 years
The Saint Paul Water Utility uses a frequency factor of 2.6 breaks per 600' street block, and 1.2 breaks
block for paving areas as shown in the following example:
Illustration
cost of main relay (8"):
restoration by Water Utility
restoration by others
cost of break repair
Restoration bv Water Utilitv
- �75/ft.
- $35/ft.
- �2,SQ0
(600 R.) (a'75/ft.) -�45,000 cost to relay 600' of main (8")
(�45,000) / (70 yrs.) - $642.86 per year
($642.86/yr.) /($2,500/break) = 0.26 breaks per 600' per year
(0.26 breaks per 600' per yr.) (10 yr.) = 2.6 breaks ner 600' per 10 vrs.
�testoration bv Others (which includes work done in coniunction with sewer seaaration, reaavine, etc.)
(600 ft.) (�i5/ft.) _$21,000 cost to relay 6Q0' of main (8")
($21,000) / (70 yrs.) _ �300.00 per year
(�300/yr.) /($2,500/break) = 0.12 breaks per 6Q0' per year
(0.12 breaks per 640' per yr.) (10 yrs.) = 1.2 breaks per 6d0' ner 10 vrs.
recently
for pipe
600' street
No. 1
{.: • . , .. . . .
:':�;�.',,,....,>.�:,>:;:::>^�•.::.f �:. f1�i<,�
.,,,�,. ...,,.,..-,,,,,..•.. . .
•;:.•. ... ..:::: •: • • •:. •�•-.:• :.:::::.:::.::.:::•:::•::::•:.• .
•:: :. .,,;. ....,.: . ......
. ..... �.:;::: • ...:.::.:.;:•�:;.• .:; . '�...... ;4�:..E�;.I��...:' ..: :.. .:.....
:.�. .. .:, . ........
� ............. .:: . ..:... ...:: . ..::.::: • .
. :..::. .:.. ...., .... ,� •.. • • ,.:. �.:.. •: <•-��:: :<::; ::>:::•:;•:::�:z.::;::•::::: ;.,. ...:: :...
hx•.�.n•.::v..:i:::.:ii:i:r.:v.i:::..:v.:r .:.:. ....... . ��. .... .:.
�;:>yy. .....�...ay ...vvr.vx:••; y •:••.rn}::•:tt.v tt.•...k..a}}}vavfiC{+ ,v,ytiY•}};.•:::: :N:�{t{nk{.....:v�}};: n}vn•{x:., rt..i'+..M.w{y •:t+.ii}�:r.},�.w� v ?i:{r{.;{.;{3. ..ii:{?:!?i:?�iir,ii.••, .?•� r{:?:i??i"^'ri:}:i{rx}};Y:��}
'.:::�:.�':iii.'. 4::: .�:'i'.:ii :.' . .: �.2<,. .. � . �.y . . i . � ::i;::• .' : :..: . :.} . . . .....i:iv�•"'' �i .i.J,..... :: . � :: :::: ': . ' : . .. .:....: .: . : � ' . .•%
.........::::..��:.:>:::�:�.��..:;�a.�:::::��....: >��:�::��.���.:;:�`�� ��.��:�><:.����:;<:.:��s: .:��� �.�o�:::.. �].��. ����.��1::=
::::.::::....:::.::.....,.,.,..::.v w..�,;;�.....:::........,..... �,;<....:..�
N�....v...��w..::��>..s:�.�.��.�-.�;:.��.>:,•,�. � .�,.,�.:�;� �E�.�.�..�„�:���... :�:�k .��:�r.�;:;,�.:�:�;:w>�:::�::::�;::<.�.�,;:,�:�:;,:.�;�.�:�.�:�,�,::�:,�
:�•:+f.Y.•:'.k'v: {;:.....:??:::;;Oi:^:^�f{4::v:�•1;}?:;:4:!,iti?:^:ii� •i::�i' ! }�^f�:!�'h+}}iFr,{r3v fy.}:•:Ci^:!iY.•4,r?Y' v,{:f:{�,v,.:•}}'fi• •r y}� ' vr{xn'l;ti.y.v
�' � ��`:�:��!'�?�::>'���� ``�:. .: . "
��
�`:�::>�>'�`�i�»�:: :aa:�� ::::::�:��t��e�:`''�:��::::ru� ���e::::�s���s .:.........................
:..::.. .........::::�. �'�:..�,,.A �:.. .�:.�.:..;:;�:;..,:.,.::::::..�.�: .........:.,.:.::�. .. . ...,....... . ..�.,� . . �
.xv.�.�vM:�:.N;F,....:: :.�:: ..�:::::.�.�.: ....�.H..�.,�.....:w�.... ................. ..::. ... ..
:::.::... .,�.. w,,. :
�...��...,..�,...�,.w�.,�.... �..:. .��.:�>:;;�. �:.,�.
..:....::.,.. .r�.... .... ...K.:.h...::.......v.,K.. :.....,...,..,.::.�..:..N.xx....:....Y>.:::.:k.. .:<....:.,,...�..:,,.,.:....:...,.urv<::<.v;.:.::.,.:.>::��u:;.: �:�.�<,�,�,�.:.,>. �..,,:.:. ..n:.. v...........:w��� ��::;�;.�: :::
�' : •.�::: •. � Y,..:,:: :!CN..;;N,.,- ..:..x�.:.� .; r;.. .. F.{. .: 4::.:..,....:.::•v: •: :.:::<:.:: w.. : . ...^.`.2...�:::: .....ii : . ,. •.:;: •v. . .�.. . .�}
•.v:: . �i: �'.• . ,v.vv ;
. .; •. . :i. . . }.;. •.;: � ' . :
....
. . ..>:•: .�... � . . •.;�.; . ;:.,:,:; . ; . . : •' •:+••>. �
� �. ..�, � �:b7�3:i'�a€��:. .>:;:.:� . �: :::. :�£? >: �I`���;:'>•:��`�:::�i� <::`��3it€ .�a.�,]:�,�,�.:'.. °:tf.:�:��:�.::.�'.:<:>:.'.'€i�:..'.:�
f�b:�?z�.....t4..;:.<:�t:�.:.: �.�,:. ... 4.. ...:: . .: ... .: :.::.:: .::::::.::,:::: :::.::.�: .. .:: :.:�.::::: ..: ....:. . .. �......:.....:: ... .
...
... .,....... �.� .,..,.::.m....� .::h.. .� �.....:..:,.:::.::::.::,, ..::.
fc.•;:x•;:r;x•:w.;��trr.:t:w:,;r�:...•::..•.ih:�•.•::�>:r:•:: •: ••.,...,..:...........:.. w�fx..:.wr::.n•...:....:w.....�W:;::.•,.•iv.v..vx,•:,•:.x:..•.v.,.r�....rr....v,.v.:a:,.r:•rrrt:txrx:::...::a,x:•::•:x:�:o-x.Gf
r•:-.v. . •nvurn••••••.vn •.v.mxxv.v:•••.�n�•: v�vnvvvvv•xv +r :x•v.:: v.v•:: • ::.vvvw:n :• �xvvv::.v+w.r•: },v,{.}};;.,v,.}}4:�:ti: ••,••w •x•.v.••.x••:i4:"^:^\17::::{•;n••nx;.,v,n••;••••••v:••�n••••••v,.••v•v•.ry;{rn;; r•
.,,.;..:: •s••:•:.: :. •<.a ...::.:.::::.:.:.:...;. : :.::.:;:::. .> '�: :K.::.::.:..::..::>•:::: .:.::.,::.: u>.<..:,.>:..:;:.}.y..;�••. :.... .:...:...,.. , ..,-.::. ;:r:.:,..:: ::: . .
::: .. . : � < ��;:�<::�J �. ��jW�.�. r..�.e ���:::�:�C��:�:>:�:. :»���':.. �<'•;�: : � �!:�:�:': ` �'�1:�
�`#��::>:�::�"�.0:�:�C4z�:t�.#���:::;�s�::�i:E;:�..��..�,�..�. �r.: �t.. x� .....: .:...:.....: .. ..... ............ . .............. .......... ..................: .. .::: ....�'.E.. .�.�`►...:::: .::::. �..:..... .
vti::.}:.::.;�G: •v::.;•::{.i•::::::::{:::.}•.}•:.}•.}v .: ........: .........: . .:: ........ ..: .: ....... .. ... ...�••: ••': •:::: .; .; ... ..; .; .i•:':i4i:'i�l.::K.h+i:titi�.W.'tiJii:4::4:i..i•.{v::�:'$C%k:ti:•:tii•:ii{:i43:ivn•.L�ir:nm•mKKtwrk
i1�..r.vn.1nl'vx.mM1..vn4uvnrr..�.....yn1.44vx.•.:::::::.:vn.W..rrxrxn0.yn..tiv.:�:.1+}i:4:•:::X•:itin\yti4y.+..+ny......�.�.»y{�nnn . v
..�........:�vnx• •:•rvvr•v •.v.,....::v.vvvvu:•.v:• •:.•.v:r:::w.•::u•:x•:::::::::x::wwu•w•v,.v::v: •::r:::vn r::vnw•:'::�'rii{{{r.••.}:?+J.-0C+�7N�Cr:r�:•{xr:tx�•i•;�C{{r{••;•;t::;r;;•r�r;�;r• :•r•vxl{.v.vN.i..
Y::�•::.>.. •�{::.. :..i.:A{.i: :..}•:.. 6.. :. . . :.}:..:...i::p:..:. ::\.. :.� .�:.i::.i :..: ::.::: ::::: .:::. .:...::: .::: .::.: :} .:;.,... .•:: :.�::.iSC.i•:.�.�:... Y... ..i:..:. ..: ...i{}..�..�::.�:.:::..:.: ;.: ....:. .ii:: . :..::::i:: ... •.�:::::::.::.:: ...i
. . � . .;: �:: ... :: .. � :..:: :: �>�..r�����>:.:,��:::�:��:�:>:,:�e������:
�ao�:�:: �:��:� >:�:. �`h��::::��� ..��..::��:n:Q��::.�����:;:>t���::��eo�n :.::::�:..::�..:: .. �
�::w:�:�:,.�:.Nr>:;,::�;,;;n��,;;.;;�;�w��:.>r�::::;�.��?:.::�.�::;.<.:�v:>::�.:r.:x:�,:;�::.:N,:.M.nri,::;�.:w:,::.:K:��„N:w:..p.xN...�,k.v.�....w>>�;�:�m.�:;�.Nh:.::v::<w�<.;:<.::.�.,:�.:;�:<:>:h�.r,�.�:,�<..,
. ,.. ..:.:.,v:.,..,,,.xv.,...,.. .,......v�.: :.:::.,.:..,.::nv..::..,:......:.......v.,,..,...,.:...: v..v: :....::..:..,,,...v.....:..v ..:...,,.:::n...:::.>,...4.>;::<..;...>:.::.<.;,:.:.,:.»:<...>:�;::.:;:<.:..:.,,..:....v.::.,....::..v::h..:::.vn:.»...:�
p•n:•:::}5.�. .::f::}.v .:. .:::::. ... 7U.::::::r.:... :::::::M:.� .:..,::.i':.i'n. .f::.:: :i..{;. . •.i'.::...:::.iv: :. AC:.:::.i' :::: :ti::':::::::::::::::...... .: : ...: ..1.... ...ii%: .,: ... .:v........L:i:::::::.�;: :: �:.1. . ,{.... .::::: ..... :.
y� y{�� ::. .....>;�. : : . :; <..���<<:::�:: <:���r:�::.:an+�::.>�1:���r�#�d::�
j]���: �::��xfi��: :��:: .. :. >:::: �: a� . �::� ::c���� :;:.::�:�"��::�:: �:. ��n; �:�� � .:���d: ..
:i'..i•p;•;;•, •;••;;•�.y..y ... ...: ....:..:.�..n�C�:.y..,..;,-..;..:v•:�•.:�...n v ...�,.�.�.......... ...:..i..xy... �1...r... � 4'1�"+"•.•.:.�'.•.
tym.r..n.n'rh. n.r.1..�x.x'kvn.' n�v.�.m....A.y.w.1�v..yh1.m.v..y.y....ti..nv.. \4.J+.�.+ .. \..Km..{w::.y. .::�.; .: •• • • • •• :. tivi..' 4i:•.'v'r:iriti•:'r.4:ti:::•..' n.x.•••• • k::v::4:ii:i::i•Yr}iii::C•ii:i3::ri i:::Liri� �
• rvvr•:.....: w . .. . x••.w. ;.v:.. .. h0 Ctir.v.:xpy�:•b":•;•qwi9:9,v,.;• •xv�w:....�..y�x• r�nM1 . ....n..:.,n:r.s:.•r,:�•'.�`.` C�:I:i:::i.^•.�.':•.nnnw:. . .iiY:�::iiSC
�....;y.i.:..:,;:,�.,:X`�"•:'�� �;::.:;. .:::•:.., ,,...,,,,, ..:. ..::..:. .::. . ...,-...:.:.:.;
. . . . : .: ::.. ::..:.. :..:..: .... .r: :.:: : .::.: : ,:.: ..:'�: .. . .: .: '. ' • . ::`':"•., : . . . . ; . . :.:. ... •:...:...::::.
. :. .:.. . . ..:... . .;..::::.::. ��:��....: �;.::: ��::> .>>�::;::�:i�::::�������� ::.>.:��:e�:��:�:e
_ ,;.:
o.�:: ::�r��b��:::_:�::��:.:�.��� �:::.:�����::.::��>.::����:...:� �1..:.
�........................ .. ......... .. �.........::.:::::.,.�.:::::.:>.:::.:.. :.... . .. . ... . .: .. ......:...... . . . ...� .. .:. . ......,, .......:;�5.'::.:v. ..... ,.........,.......,.
...�,.............,�..,..wY:..<.::n.::.,......:.:..h....:.. ..............n.....�.......,.,.,.,,......,.............<............... ,.....�.................,..,:�:.:��<:.::.:;:.::::<v:......:.::..::.:::::: ...::.:.:..:.::.:::::.:.:.....
£., :. :..�., • • . •.,a::, y.; . , ....,- . . ., .. ..�::..,;`.•: �
��x��i:�:���>��:��:�':�� ���. .ri�<����:�'e..
.:::.
Avi:tiiii•:ti4:•:\�.1'JC{S4>k4i'v%{�+:2i�ti�.L♦l'dkC�:iVii �:•ti4:•:ii•h�:•::h•:'m�K
.v.v x•....•r•:••v :.,. x e•.. v. x•r•,h;:•.v:..;,.;�.,vyk.,.••.y:,;;•;.e,.:�+..;••::.,;;.v.;x.....o:�:?:::::v,v:�.::.:yyy,�.;x.;;•:?:::".."�i:::;e,•;:.;•;..y...y,.•;.v. �;.v>::;..:.v•.f?.:N'+ +'+c
..;,..]$^...... }:;}?:{..;:M:;d'.f.l,.M.;{\., . .:1
..3.<,. � :.: ;:.;; . .,.< : . �i� <•���:a�::>��c����::�.��uc�� .:t��:::���:::��:����::::
:.:
��:<. �:��a:...; ..�t���: ::� <; . �:-�:��....�a��..::��.��€. � .., �
h.r,.:..x.<:: .. .. ... .:<::. ..�... �� ..... .. :.:..:. . .:..::.:: :...
... ::. ., . . :... .., ., ..... �.��;�;:«�,�:x�,:;�.x.;.�..,�.:�.�>.wk
�w.z.�,a;,.:x:�aw,zt,ti, aa,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,5..•,;,tcta.�,^.a�s.o.:;x..•u•�..;z:�;'•.,:;:.,.�;x<a:w.,.a.t<;•:;ca,.zw.�:x:::,...:;..s;.w,.�,w..:,t::a�aa�o:r�.�.w,.wu•,•;,.
•.;.v.};nx�::i?. •• ••:. : :wYv¢yJ?ti�i•%v. . • nv xv} . {: CL?�•m;.y ;.,vn},v,ny :^:wilil,v,.}},x} wvrnv
.,.. . "C;?Y3": . . .' . '4'+'�`k:' ',��:
..... . ..., . .,..+ . ."v,.^,Y,. . .: . , :.,. : •.M:;:;,w,,.;�t,}.,a:t••.x.,;;;,�;;;{t:YrYfi'.{+M1.M1;x.,v,y;rwr�. AYjY.^:•f.'ii.rr�?{�ny ; }••y:+.•:.,v,•;.;ry v. • .�}`.;•:C... .
.,<:: 7�
N.<.�.:<;;�:... .4:. :.�xc�>>.<..�F>n:�:e�<:�:���d::>������.:<:����a�� a��.� ��� ��z���t�, ��:��i���a: .��'��::,.<��
<:� .;.....:...,......?€�:<.. :. . .,. ...., �t�. ........,,.� ..,.... . . ................,.,...,.v.....::.
.
•� . ..... .�. .�% . . .:. .. ,... .
�Y.�iin4n� Y:J'+.W�}S:A�35i. ASCVAInQGSh}}TAivF�J6 •• . ii}iT+.PinWmY%4h+bJh'iJ'Y..i+n•i`Fn'JS'ukJij}fTinVhV.(S3.2h�V'h'tih}YYNiY" 'MW}�JGAJJv' 'rhk�}}SS}iii�i:Lii}}}'+} inY}h3J]$hvxi}}b+:S�i'�6k�
• �{•{r{wN v . . rr.vx . . '. . •••••y :v.
...Py.....{.. {�...Y:.;;:..�:::R...:{}r•:•.••:•{r{x•%r.n;!r�e;¢......�.:.:.. Y.NC<trJ:??i:tF?e{nk{t?Y�:?i+.•'?!l,H.d:!yS•f.?r.r..,..H fi::{SNti!fN{,.•i^:.;,':.`•SSS'..}C?�F':?^!tii�{i{,H.SifS{+i.vr,ri.vr•.
,:..,;,<:'�'` :;<:• ., stK:, ,, ., w� �0�3.f� .�. �.�:f •�l � .::�::�... ".;�:x;:�:y�. �•:�, � L`.G��S �� � �.�`�.:. #�,�.'��'J.8
• Yy:Y• <:,':.�'•.�#�3�'��7:�,'i��. ,;�1..... .� ..�u.a. ... `� �.
•::: , : :..: .: . ..: •...: .:.,:;•::: :.� . . .:: •::. ...... . ....���'
•• •• � •� � „�,: ......:. , .<••:•::;�;:x<�:Hr:i:?�'.'"«;s�.ze:co�:;fs�r:z;�,:�.�•
. ...•:::...; ......, ........ . :...... .
'.;;,4z'i,;.co.zS�c.x�.A.ic.,..co;cccwoa.cw..auo-a3co-axw,�,..w.c:.<:: ti.mm.,S.;ra.w�,.•...w..vx•W;o-:cw • .�,�,.,�:<u•...w�,c,�c�w: •.�,.�x<t'awwrr.L.c,..w�,.. • •a,rt,wcts>rfzt.x,r.xw
�}v;•}L}\:.:'!N.N{.}:!-0t+i�k •�nvi:ii:fi'x,vx•,xxr}v.};.}.. "x'Y::n};xnv.}�};p}}}},xx;;n;lJv};.;?(+••nv.4�;.x:%:?{?r^?!C???'i;:r•u;na�py.v.Fn�v�^�.^,�::k:�vvv.}ii4�:��%<%ivnw�n,xy¢y}}}:v,}};.};nyk{?h,wn�.v.vv}wy,y{¢:://,?.};.
:.:.. .....%;..n.,.,.. r.r..., .rrr......r . g %...Y.•:.
�#e�4�::;`t�:�: :.�i��.. �����:,..�.�Q:��#::��`�ti�;��t�:a�... ..F���;�� : :��i�::c�:ro�?�:::�v�;�� >�:���
bra�...�tw�...�..v.,.�.,,.v.kv,awh.�..�.,.,.�>s„�.,..•...v.v...•: k.,aw,.t�. h+�whv..,�.rr:.ww..•ww.,arrw.a�s,�as�.�...�.,.,..v. v v�y,fts.fv.tww...>.wax,,.waaasr.rww.r.,t�..+h,�,.,arR�aavr,�
v.tiy,$i�.`�i."•.`•S!:v.'>.•'.�:!:3•'.�S)(i?r'v,i��%vi^,,.Sy.2Y¢.�+.i1i+,�+%;+;�!N{A.y....x?�a�;•i,x,w.'?!!;:CM'..x..:rr. !M?��n;!!:�%,v,.�r.a,.}.:..;.......r., Y,•:,H.!^:r,fy�' yy�,.�,!."•M.^•.}�?fi'�/.,+iCi:WC,�i�'r?},.ip!K��!i�Ha"��{:v�y:}�?+�,��:��: •:}Y:�a.�•;I�?T.?ik:�..
. �1.;.. :.:<:r:' ":: . �' �.�i::c :i�\?W.#74l7:2:�:�f74l�Y?��::•':�hi?7•``•:V. . '.�•
.:. . .... '� e'�i� ����
x . ,
��,�:��, .i.��.�� #������i:�`��{:..:'�i�: 5� b�:�';:�;�;.;��::'� '.: :���,��.,�.t,�.,.�.' ,..�..
::;: .:
4rii.... . r .... . `F.. .. • . .i: ... . v.'.•. v: • :. . r. . .. n ..... . ......
iG.JmntiAn'M�'v.�si.." wim�tiq4.v.40.phwkWHkK••lti'i4iRv�%�MAVnti7\irittiiyG.v+h.�nr. •• � ♦ n W�itiiA{mOnFi.w+�iv.Tv.�v+��ki<3:in{tiS •• •
..4::..'+.•`.v' .�,wn".Qx>.pik.Mn'�:•�:•'.Yii .w+y,.,m.�vr rx;pm;:mx�:;ryY,»y,v,q);•,v,4..,+'?!?!?:{�m.v,...:n"v:i n .: :.'^)%.myytirr{;w�y„v,:'iv�:::n'!.'•f.`•S:iYv.i•:.i.��.....�}�'....1 {,$��•�•;mwr�:.::::/Y.'?:Si'.lt;:::�?±.$�.>+v:/1.�.(•e.,wn•....
. �
.{. . :::Jy :i'�i.. n:. ..ti4•
:. :.. . . . :
<:>:�::�:::: . .a��;�:::::�€��:4`�a:�.:::�.�:r��<<<: � . �`��� �..
. . . :::::
., , ::.:.:.. . : � . . . .
. . . .;..; . : ;_:. :{::::....
:..��::., . ..
.. :;. ,: : .
�� r� :.u�:>.: �� .:.�::.:::�..�:����;:�;..�::::.�� �:.��:�....
...:.. ��. � ��� � ...�„�...
•iaxG:;.;;«�s�i2;w...:a:xN:a,w,.:wiW,F7:;'r.:,: .�.,:..>.w,.%.`.r::;%xG:G:::r.:w.r,x•xo..•..,M1..�w,cSxSwwx:N;;:::,.;:h�..- •�:ca::•.,a�.•;.r.u.:,•a::.•w::c::v::ua:wx;Nuuu.a:,�:•,r.a:v:::•w..x,<:Y9.,.. �•:�w:«s...4..•.,•�;r.;�s
�.,,i.y,.. .�
C�Sf���'•
�:;<�;.� �s
Attachment No. 2
�
�
�
I if f � '� �
',�� � � .
��I�.� �, .�
.4.
Q
. , ' �
� J .
' •� �.
1 �
1 � �• � � s
� . � ; �..
. � � �
. • I ( .� . .
. I � i �• ��•. '
�'�;;.
� i 'J :,y� •
' � ��-� .
. , '; � `
. , fz� ( �';Q`.
�Q
. .' j� �� �
� � �1,
1 = r
v� �.�� �• .
. ' ' QI ' "'�� � .
f .� �
i , ..�. � •
, . I i T •�. .
� I , � : �: �.
, . �
...,.�:
- , , � �.�
�
, � ,� ;�..
� 4' . ,�1• -
� . . 2� %� .
; �.:.a'r
• . . . ' • � , . ' ' � . ' •y`Af... . .� • ,
� _ • , .. . -::��� . :Y - ' , .
. ' � • � ; . . �A 2
' .. .. , , • . � . .+
—_�—.— ecxe • r• . : • . • . , , : ' ' . • • . '; .Y'. ..:-..=+,_::-
%� WEFER�Tb QENEWALiL"ANS ►AfiEC ,. � � IIEfER TO DETML rLAMS ►AQES � ' ' �AQE ` '
.." - ' ��' �.}.. . ._. . .. .. ._. . .�:i' . �, ai�;Y'>•` � :�e::�,i:e: .�:�i`:i.;✓l�iY;.. v4/i� ._:,:;;,..n.�e"..:[s;yiw:[::.i "�C �`r•r '1-.'r�.i.(+:.
��.�,.` ;'`� "i:^'� _ , . . , .�, l.i.,.. .'S�:.'i�..:,.'.. :.o:,. ::"�:.n�,. S '•-��`. .. . aMl
. . • . . :iF.+.' ^'tiV .+r.
.:j.�. , .�,Ja' v'a..�:::: ;���� ,�J��
. -. .1:Ji�s.. �p�.' •{:
. . ti�� - ...
.. . . f t. .
. . . . :"'�.. '
:.Y._ �,1'. . . . .n.��� J .
. . . . �f. n�1.iY'r.' �,-'`i
s �k :�r'
�:4_.�n. �.
.r�
^\"` �'h : ¢i �� .
. �:M
a u.....:� ,
r�A'�'� �;qr ��:.:` �n"�'d' .
'�+\ �
%'� �C::` ��`�':yv .^�:
.C�. � �. �7¢S ':h SSi:i�'•W:', :'Y�.
.1. .t• . .
.. . . � :' �•ir'v.
..� .. `. , . ^v '
�ya: . . .�'.zw. JS�:
.'$. -:'h ..i`�i_ ..,.�t�,'C_•r.a^t. 'wrst�v�•:.:� .�ct::i•, �:a.��v:�,•... ..:,�..*.,. ..
. . • .�.t 4 . l .. V. . . .. .. . Y�: ::�t�'n �i,ii�'v:v. :�?���T`��::. hia•:.�y �..�.. . . . .
.t: . �•• .:c r..:....
- ��<:2 = �.o....,
: � ;> . `S�
�:a.° . . .
.��: . . ._rtav:,,.,.
. =Y�a _. . . .v
. ,<;, . . ... . . . .. .
.. '-a � . . .. ,
�.. . ._.. .. . ::k: �. r �.\. . . , r . .
. ..... . .. � �r .. . w... .. . . .. . _ . . . � . �. , . . .. ,.
.. . > . . :t � ... .. .. >:z:w, �...,: ..
� ~�
>_ :.
L:'
To:
From.
� Subject:
CITY OF M�NDUTA AEIGHTS
September 1, 1995
Mayor, City Council and City A
Kevin 8atchelder, Administrative Assis�
Yauth Ballfields at Mendota P1aza
This past Spring, the City considered alternative sites for the location of T�
Transitianal League fields and yauth sized baseball fields. Sites that were conside
front yard of the Public Works garage, Resurnection Cemetery, taac forfeit land in
Qffice Park, and at the Mendota Plaza. Paster Enterprises, awners of the Mendot
gave the City an affirmative response to the possibility of making improvements o
southwest corner of the Mendota Plaza site for tempoia�y youth sized fiel.ds.
Meetings have been held with the Mendota Heights Athletic Assaciatian (N
discuss the agpmpriate sized fields and age groups to be served so that their great�
could be addressed. MHAA has indicated that two small youth sized fields, as op�
larger field, would best address their needs. The sixty five foot {65'} basegaths p�
the pmposed desiga wauld allow play by youths (both bays and girrls) up to age 11
has indicated that they would pmvide a letter of suppart for tl�is pmject and tlais sb
availa.ble Z}uesday evening.
Guy Kullander, Parks�Project Manager, has provided a field layaut, a cost e
a time schedule for construction this year so that these fields may be availab% in l;
(Please see attached memos from Guy and attached field design plan.) The cost is �
be approximately $60,000, pri.marily to provide grading and topsoil sa that turf' ma
establi.shed. Cost savings, from this estimate, could be realiz.ed depending on gradi
quantities and black dirt costs. M]EiAA has offered to provide some "sweat equity"
project and there is a possibility the City could save some costs on some af the imp
such as tillingJmck picking, benehes, plates and ather items.
The Parks and Recreation Commissian has not had a chance to review this s
plan, however, staff indicated to the Commission last month t�at this pmject might
Council before their September meeting. The Comamission ind.icated at that time tb
Special Parks Fund would be appropriate to fund this facility, however, they alsa v
that if it exceeded $25,000 that they wauld like a chaace to review and make a
recommendat�on, If Council desires to procec?d with this pmject, COIll2ll1SSIQII I�Vl
occur while surveying and the legal agreement worlc was being conducted. (Please
',all fields,
;d were the
'enter Point
Plaza,
the
:AA) to
ne�ds
sed to one
vided in
MH:AA
Eld be
�mate and
6.
�timated ta
be
�
o the
the
• i
�.
�
r�
attached time schedule.)
7ohn Streeter, of Paster Enterprises, has been provided a copy of this plan for his
comments and response. If the City Council desires to praceed with this proposed project for
youth sized ballfields, an agreement will have to be negotiated between the City and Paster
Enterprises for the use of the land, on a temporary basis. The City Council should consider
these proposed improvements in light of the temporary basis of any potential agreement.
As Council is aware, MHAA has a growing softball and baseball program for the youth
of Mendota Heights. Their need for field space requires that they rent and lease fields from
neighboring cities, private schools and public schools, in addition to the games that they pla.y
on City fields. City staff has been meeting with MHAA and local softball interests to discuss
the field use at Mendakota Park. While these two fields will not dampen MHAA's interest in
the Mendakota fields, they would significantly help MHAA meet the needs of their youth
programs.
ACTION REQUIRID
Consider the proposed youth sized ball fields at Mendota Plaza. If the City Council so_
desires, they should pass a motion approving this project, to be funded by the 5pecial Park
Fund in an amount not to exceed $60,000, and to direct staff to begin work on surveying and
preparing a legal agreement with Paster Enterprises.
f �
i
a-_i
► +
August 29, 1995
Memo to: Tom Lawell and Kevin Batchelder
v From: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager
Subject: Estimate to construct two ball fields at Mendot�
. Plaza
Construction of two temporary ball fields at the Mendota Plaza
can be accomplished with the estimated cost to be from $ 0,000 to
$ 60,000. The exact costs cannot be determined until a c mplete
design and total materials required are determined.
The biggest unknown quantities are for grading and topso'1. The
imporvements to the parking lot, constructed in August, esulted
in a large quantity of material that was "spread" in the south
east and northeast areas of the undeveloped portion of the site.
Because of this a topographic survey must be done to dete mine
exactly how much dirt must be moved and shaped on the sit .
Also the site has no topsoil. Black dirt/topsoil mu�st be rought
onto the site. Approximately four inches (min.) must be s read
and tilled into the outfild and side line areas which equ ls
2.3 acres in size. Black dirt prices vary due to availabi ity.
and trucking costs depend on distarice of haul. To purchas the
dirt, haul it to the site and spread it can cost from $8. 0 to.
$15.00 per cubic yard. For this estimate I used $10.00.
Estimate
Grading.�.,,,Est. 7500 cu. yds dirt moved.......$
Topsoil Est. 1250 cu. yds. In place........
Till/rock pick turf areas - approx. 3 acres.....
Ag Lime infield areas - 4 inches x 2500 sq yd
Seed, fertilizer, and sod strip - 2.3 ac.@ $1800
Backstops 2-16' high by 10'/20'/10' (40' long)
Protective fence by players benches .............
Players benches 4 @ $500 each ... ..............
Home plate, base supports, and foul poles.......
15,OOOI
12,500
2,000
4,500
4,000
4,000
1,800
2,000
1,200
.� z. �.,�.,
Engineering, inspecting, survey 15� 7,000
Contingency 10� 5,000
Legal ( Paster agreement) 1,000
$ 60,000
A minimun development cost could be $ 50,000, but for thi
happen grading quantities must go down, black dirt costs
must be low, and contingency costs low.
to
�
, r
.
•t �
August 29, 1995
Memo �a: Tom Lawel3. and Kevin Ba�chelder
From: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager
Subject: Development of ball fields at Mendota P1aza
If this project is to proceed I see the foliowing time lin,e
that would be neces�ary for the fields to be used in May of
1996.
5eptember 5, i9�5 - Council appraves project and directs staff ta
proceed, Assume funding fram Special Park
September 6 - Survey of existing topography and design of
fields. Layout, drainage, etc..•-�
September 6 - Contact made with Paster Enterprises to work
: out a useJdevaiopment agreement
September '! 9
Qctober 3
�ctober 9
October 23
April%May 1996
_ ••.
- Council apprav�s Paster agreement
- Council appraves plans and specs - directs
staff to seek bids for grading �
- Coucil awards bid
- Grading work begins. Est. 2 weeks
.= Ins�all ag-line infields, backstops, safety
fence, benches, and turf imparvements.
Turf: Includes seed, fertilizer, sad str�.p
at edge of ag-line infields {if availabl:e}
This would be dormant seeded with additional
infi3l seeding early in spring.
- Overseed all turf areas.
- Install players benches
- Install reguiatary signage
- Install autside drinking fountail on back of
building with approvals from Paster Enter�.
- Install anchors for bases and homeplate
- Fields availabe for play. Outiield turf
conditions unknown - depends on weather -
no irrigations system. Turf would be �imilar
to neighborhood parks.
Because dormant seeding is anticipatd the exact time when
grading could begin could be extended into late October. I� must
be understood that the weather at this time of year can be wet
and soii canditions slow to dry out and these conditions may
hinder speedy campletion of the job. Seeding can occur any time
before first snowfa3l.
SEP-19-1995 14�35 PASTER ENTERPRISES
612 646I1389 P.02i02
� •
DL-�TELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF
2227 Univasity Ave. • Sc PaaI, MN 55114-16i7 • 61?�Cie
September 'i 9, 9 995
cENTRAt. QL,�,zw
45th �fc Central Ave. N,E.
Minnet�polis, Mianosota
Honorable Mayor Mertensotto and
Members of the City Council
City of Mendota Heights
CRYSTAL SHOPPING CENTER 1101 �ctoria Curve
Bass I.akc Road b Wes[ Btoadway
cays�, Minnaota Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120
DOpDWAY SHOPPING CENTER
Smith & Dodd Road
• West S� Paul, Minnesota
RE: Proposed Youth 6all Fieids on P�operty
Mendota Plaza Shopping Center
The installation of the storm sewer system, land;
new improved lighting has creaied an improved
shopping atmosphere at Mendota Ptaza�
EiOP1�YNG C�NTFRS
7901• Fax 612-646-1389
ot
and
and
LEXi1�IG'nON PL,AZA SHOPFES We now have serious inquiries regardi�g le sing the
�"1D��"� ��'``�` undevelo '
����, M;,,��, ped property south or in the back��of the Shoppin8
Center afong Ptaza Drive. it appears that.. we � w II have a
pvrtion of this land Leased by tf�e first part �pf �ext �ear.
E ,
�� PL� With a minimum of Aradi�� and tree �emova'!, it ap�ears tt�at
staxx�.iia�DfladRo�a a youth ball field cou(d be constructed east of t�he south
Mendota Heighu. M�� entrance behind the shopping center. ' � .. '
MOUNDSVIEW SQUARE
Hwy.10 & Long I.ake Road
Mounds view, Minnesota
NORTI9WAY SHOPpING CENTER
Sta�c Hwy. 23 & Woodland
CSnlc Pincs. MinnEsota
It is our best guess that thls wif! be the tast piece o property
to be leased sou#h of the shopping center. We exp ct that it
will be developed within the next 2 to 3 years. tf t e City of
Mendota Heights woutd elect to use this as a youth bat{ field
until the land is leased, Mendota Ma!! Associates ould be
giad to cooperate.
Respectfully yau�s,
PASTE NTERPRISES
SIBLEY PLA7a `
Wa•-1 71h Suret d� bavan
sc. p.ui, Minnesota dward J. Paster
"OUTHVIEW SHOPPllYG CENTER
Southview �lvd. & 13chAve. S
South St Paul, Minarsota
Chief Executive Officer
EJP/(ah
•'+ ��F:�:; �i:;:�. r:'• . .,..
� .
.. �
,�TI�ki7�r, � -4l�::�f.7:::t�!�..�J'..1:'+�.::�!w
r„ '
y�}ti � ����` ,� � �•• �. . _,.�. �: ��., �'^�• •
... �.~!.� �.�i. . �. `..t..'.� #�,!%1 i:•
TO:
.[��Iu.B
CITY OF MENDOTA HEtGHTS
�
August 30, 1995
Mayor, City Council and Cifiy Admin at
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis a
SUBJECT: Case Na. 95-13; Star Builders - Variance, CUP and Modifi�d Critical
Area Review
DtSGUSStt�N
Mr. Ken Nordby, an architect representing Alden Landrevilte, af 1
Memoria! Highway, appeared at public hearings in July and August to r+
Criticat Area Review, a Gonditional Use Permit for Accessory Structure
house? and a Variance to Section '7,2{1(?} to a!!ow a second, garage. T
requested approvals are to allaw the construction of a 728 square foot
garage, a paol and pool house on Mr. l,andreville's five acre property. ,
Planning Gommission meeting, it was discovered a second variance wa;
allow a detached garage nearer the front lot tine than the principal strut
(Section 4.5(4). Please see attached Planner's Report and Application.
The Planning Commissian reviewed the Critical Area standards ar
there was minimal impact to grading and vegetation. The P[anning Corr
discussed drainage to the Werthauser property, but felt this developmer
have minimaE impact or additional runoff. In regards to the variance req
Commissioner Friel felt there was no hardship demonstrated and that th
is being put to a reasonable use. �ther Commissioners fett that this fiv�
unique, that the proposed structures will not alter the character of the
neighborhood and that the structures w'rtt barely be visible to the neighE
RECt�MMENDATiON
The Ptanning Commission vated 5-0 ta ciose the public hearing.
Planning Commission voted 5-Q to recommend that City Council approti
Area Modified Site Plan and a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Str
allow cons#ruction of the pool house. The Planning Commission voted
Friel) to recommend that the City Council grant Variances to Section 7.
10 Sibiey
�uesx a
ool
etached
t the
needed to
ure
felt that
would
property
acre lot is
�e
a G�i#ical
.ture to
1 (Nay:
10) and
r
Section 4.5(4) to allow second garage, proposed to be 728 square feet, that
would be located nearer the front lot line than the principle structure, as proposed
on plans dated 8-14-95.
ACTION REQUIRED
Meet with the applicant. If the City Council desires to implement the
recommendation of the Planning Commission, they should pass a motion adopting
Resolution No. 95- , A RESOLUT/ON APPROV/NG A CR/T/CAL AREA SITE
PLAN, A COND/T/ONAL USE PERM/T FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE, AND
VARIA .NCES FOR A SECOND GARAGE AT 10 �0 SIBLEY MEMORIAL H/GHWA Y.
KLB:kkb ��
_
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO . 95-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VARIAI
CRITICAL AREA REVIEW ALLOWING A GARAGE, POOL AND POOL H
CONSTRUCTED AT 1010 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
(PLANNING CASE NO. 95-13)
� AND
E TO BE
WHEREAS, Mr. Alden Landreville, of 1010 Sibley Memorial Highw y, has
made application for a Critical Area Review for a Modified Site Plan, a C nditional
Use Permit for Accessory Structure to allow construction of a poAl and a pool
house and for a Variance to Section 7.2(10) to allow a second garage, s id garage
proposed to be 728 square feet, and a Variance to Section 4.5(4) to allo the
garage to be located nearer the front lot line than the principle structure; and
WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing on July 25, 1995 and August 22, 1995; and
WHEREAS, based upon the public record transcribed at said publi hearings,
the Mendota Heights Planning Commission voted unanimously (5-0) to r commend
to the Mendota Heights City Council that the Critical Area Modified Site lan and a
Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Structure be approved, to allow c nstruction
of a pool and pool house as proposed on Plans in Case File No. 95-15; a,nd
WHEREAS, based upon the public record transcribed at said publi � hearings,
the Mendota Heights Planning Commission voted (41) to recommend th t the City
Council grant Variances to Section 7.2(10) and Section 4.5(4) to allow econd ,
garage, proposed to be 728 square feet that would be located nearer th front line
than the principle structure, as proposed on plans dated 8-14-95.
WHEREAS, the City Council considered said applications for Criti al Area
Review, Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Structure and Variances t their
meeting on September 5, 19,95. . I
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council f the City
of Mendota Heights that the proposed Critical Area Review, Conditional Use Permit
for Accessory Structure and Variances will have no adverse effect on t e health, �
safety and general welfare of the citizens of the community and the sur ounding �
land and that said proposed garage, pool and pool house is not adverse to the
general purpose and intent of the Critical Area Overlay �Ordinance and Z ning
Ordinance.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Critical Area Review, Conditional Use
Permit for Accessory Structure and Variances be approved to allow Mr. Alden
Landreville to construct a garage, pool and pool house, as proposed on the plans
on file in Case No. 95-13.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 5th day of
September, 1995.
By
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
,
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
►f�►�i_�Tr
Planning Commission
August 17, 1995
James E. Danielson, Pubiic Works Dir t
Case No. 95-13: Star Builders - CUP and Variance "
Critical Area Review
DISCUSSION
Mr. Joseph Griesgraber, representing Alden Landreville of 1010 :
, Memorial Highway, attended the July Planning Commission meeting req
Critical Area Review, Conditional Use -Permit and Variance for a Second
. ... , � . , - �:_. _ _
At that meeting, the Planning Commission had a proble.m identifyin
appropriate hardship for the requested variance and felt more details neec
submitted for the pool and pool house. The matter was continued to the
meeting to allow time for Mr. Landreville to submit more information addr
the Planning Commission's concerns.
�ting a
rage.
an
dtobe
Since that meeting, Mr. Landreville and his Architect, Ken Nordby, met with
staff to discuss his case and receive our advice. They also have submitt d the
attached additional information. .. -
ACTION REQUIRED
Conduct the continued'public hearing, discuss the :request with th� applicant
and arrive at a recommendation to the City Council. ;
JED:kkb
.= ?^ � �?,i r i;� n.
� ,i � -�c x;.. '' -. :
r�� �',� . _d3 �
d z�.
l. "r
••�: : � •
August 15,� 1995
Honorable�City Planning Commission
and City Council
c/o Kevin Batchelder
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve .
Mendota Heiqhts, MN 55118 �
Re: Garaqe and accessory
building and pool for
Mr. Alden Landerville.
Dear Honorable Members:
Mr. Landerville is asking for a garage. His needs for a
qarage are; antique car, sports car, boat and snowmobiles.
These are in addition to his other vehicles (3).
We looked at attaching the needed space to the existinq
qaraqe, however, we encountered the tollowing: relocation �
of .established landscaped areas, removal of existing trees
at the qarage and on the north side of the existinq driveway,
increased sl.ope on the north side of relocated driveway, and
increase the impervious area by an additional driveway re-
quired, all which seems to create a hardship. �
Mr. Landerville is also asking for an accessory building at
the pool as shown on attached plans. It was indicated by
Mr. Batchelder that if the structure was 425 SQ.FT. or less
we could construct it as a permitted use, thus making this
request for the garage only. The swimming pool will be
located and fenced as shown on the site plan.
We are herein addressing the items of critical area, variance
and conditional use: '
Critical Area; the accompanying site plan shows the
following:
245 EAST ROSELAWN AVENUE • SUITE 30 • ST. PAUL, MN. 55117 •(612) 487-3281
August 15, 1995
Honorable City Planning Commission
and Council
Page 2.
1. Existing topography with no changes
due to this request.
2. Drainage of water with no significant
chanqes due to new roofs (the volume
of storm water created by this proposa
is infinitesimal on this 4.5 acre site
3. The soils in this area for both the
garage and pool are topsoil and�shall
be redistributed on the site. No
erosion of soils shall occur by the
anticipated work.
4. The tlora and fauna which occupy the
site of the proposed garage and drive
are scrub underbrush and one saplinq
tree approximately 1" diameter trunk
and sod where the driveway is to be
e$tended. The area Where the pool is
to be placed was disturbed at the tim
of construction of the residence and
thus no flora or fauna will be distur
5. There are no buildinqs, features or a eas
of historic significance on this prop rty.
6. Proposed finish qrading is already es ab-
lished. It is not necessary to revis any
of the eRistinq grades for this propoled
work .
7. Landscaping is shown on the site plan
No trees are to be removed from site or
this proposed work.
8. A proposed drainaqe plan is not appli�able
(see item 2).
9. Erosion and sedimentation control is
applicable due to the location of prc
work.
�
ot �
osed j
�
�
August 15, 1995
Honorable City Planning Commission
and Council
Page 3.
10. The proposed site, alignment, heiqht
and use of structures is shown on
attached plans.
11. Delineation of new and existing paved
areas is shown on attached plans.
12. Vehicular and pedestrian traffic to
the site is by the existing driveway
shown on attached plans.
13. Parkinq is existinq and also shown on
attached plans. .
14. No areas are dedicated for public use.
. 15. No soils are to be stored on site. All
materials excavated shall be graded
with garaqe structure or the pool struc-
ture. - �
This concludes reference to Ordinance item 2.3 (site plan -
contents) in regards to the Critical Area.
Variance; this section shall address the Ordinance item 5.5
alonq with the enclosed plans:
1. The owner herein is asking for a variance
due to a hardship per 5.5(1) for the
26 x 28 garage building because:
(a) If the existinq qaraqe which
is connected to the residence
would be increased for additional
- vehicles (�antique car, sports aar,
boat & snowmobiles) we would be
required to remove existinq trees
due to the increased building
size and additional trees due to
relocation of existing driveway.
0
N
August 15, 1995
Honorable City Planning Commission
and City Council
Paqe 4.
Note! Mr. Landerville has plant
over 100 trees on this site and
start removinq trees at this tim
is against the best use of the
property, plus against the Criti
Area Plan.
n
al
(b) Relocations of estabYished lands�caped
areas. ,
(c) Rework and increase slope and drjain-
aqe on north side of driveway. �
(d) This variance if qranted would ot
alter the essential character o
the neiqhborhood in that the qa age
structure roof could only be se n
in the winter by property south of
this site and never seen from t e
River Corridor or Hiqhway 13. �
2. ApplicatiQn per 5•.b(2) is included.
3. A sketch plan (site plan) showing it
per 5.5(2)a is included.
4. The City has been qiven the list of
property owners per 5.5(2)b.
5. Topography of site is included per
5.5(2)c - 5.5(2)d is not applicable.
This concludes reference to the Ordinance item on Vari
Conditional Use Permit; this section shall address ti;
proposed swimminq pbol, fence and accessory building
for the pool, plus the garage building should the
Variance be granted:
1. Application for Conditional Use has
been submitted per 5.6(2).
e.
August 15, 1995
Honorable City Planninq Commission
and City Council
Paqe 5.
2. Twenty copies of plans and graphics
including reduced copies have been
submitted per 5.6(2)a.
3. The site development plan includes
5.6(2)b:
l. Location of all buildinqs on the
property in question includinq
both existinq�and proposed struc-
tures.
2. Location of all adjacent buildings
located within three hundred fifty
(350) feet of.the exterior boundaries
of the property in question.
3. Floor area ratio.
4. Location and nwnber of existing
and proposed parking spaces.
5. Vehicular circulation.
6. Architectural elevations (type
and materials used of all
external surface). ��
7. Sewer and water aliqnment, existinq �
and proposed. NOT APPLICABLE
8. Location and candle power of all
illuminaries. NOT APPLICABL�
9. Location .ot all existinq easements.
5.6(2)c Dimension Plan, which shall include:
1. Lot dimensions and area.
2. Dimensions of proposed and existing
structures.
3. "Typical" floor plan and "typical"
room plan.
4. �Setbacks on all buildings located
on property in question.
5. Proposed setbacks.
5.6(2)d Grading plan, which shall include:
1. Existing contour.
2. Proposed grading elevations.
0
August .15, 1995 .. . ,
Honorable City Planning Commission
and City Council
Paqe 6.
3. Drainage configuration.
4. Storm sewer catch basins and
invert elevations. NOT APPLICABLE
5. Spot Elevations. .NOT APPLICABLE
6. Proposed road profile. NOT APPLIC�
5.6(2)e Landscape Plan, which shall include:
1. Location of all existinq trees, ty�
diameter and which trees will'be
removed.
2. Location, type and diameter of all
proposed plantings.
3. Location and material used of all
screening devices.
This concludes reference to the Ordinance item on Condit�ional
Use Permi.ts. �
We have described the above to help clarify and inform s to
the total development asked for by Mr. Landerville and e
have included the plans to respond to the Ordi,nance and Staff
per our meetinq with them on August 2, 1995. We also e cour-
age Your Honors to visit the site to view the location f
this proposed garaqe and pool area.
Should you have any additional questions regardinq the
please contact me.
KGN/cros
Enc.
,
Yours Respectfully,
`�; �: �fv " f -
./ ��-�_.
,..�� / - .-.-__
K.G. Nordby, President
.,� i.,.� i . � '^t • ' F' l�\,�:i� � "'_."'^'-..� �l� � t Srrr�4`/� .r...
. ; . : ~ / f ; t iC......lt --Jt : �.. -� ,:.1� . �%- �
•� � y �, , ti.. ,r �i %' 1 '�..`""'_ .^. . ! ,+' ' ' 7 � -,,.� ' '" .
L..»._ # �� - J � � T / � ;...'".'� '"y 'S f 'L' `
_� :�1• 1i �,:�; � .� G,,,'.,1, •-�/_•• �i �-"�"'; � � �•-••_• f ���� fjy. r
��. /,�!,�'�r'I�',`'"�- `' : � f:.-`"'�=�`• I ' ! .....' J f� /" ^�:.�%:: _ ` _. t+`�::.:." _ 5%
� �• �' � � "s "_.�,,. ' i � �» ' p' F ,,,� ,�i% «."„»� . �„r- 1,•- � �,,,.� • �>.� r � w...�_•-=�/ '+ �,,•...
� .� .`%/ -' i � .�•:;� ��. —;-=_ �''''' .`��r:' � --- ' ...f . � : �. • ,,r.. �'-- a � .._ ,,•.. � ,
.� ^ '�.i'�._..� �1~ � /
%��f�,�:.��• � . ^, ' `. .r� f �� `,` •�yJ � ,,,,,% ,~ �„/•�• �� �,,,;i�+: : a � �' � ,� �r;'
t���'" �' ! � .�' . \ r i i t ( : �" � t—.....-.."' �..r i%'"S;'t.'"� , � � J � r ...r'' � ! ./ i,
� .tf { ��. ,s j; r /�� +%� � j':-."'.� � / % .. � �..'� J
•:Y ,f �� i: � ��jj•' ...-- �,,.� _ f f 1 '' ' �1 � �,...- .r ./%' � j j.
:�� /- ' �1_ � j��r f � _../ ,/ ,f. i/ r " � .. "�� ��..`,1' '
� '�,^ ' \� v, } � ' J L.: � i � ^ �..i" • .i' J/ / �' `. J""� i • , r ,.,� I �� /�.��,/'� ~ .'� i /
..:'. + �:`.'`` i' �.+� ~ !h '^�il, V'� �. f r ` � �+ ..J� ,/��,..�''•„r �r `!�� ..,'�.•
� �y � � �"� \ �.-:--,•% �- . r • ' � . ,,•� t �� f ' ___._. ", � � ' . f �- 'r,,.-'.�, �f lI, i, .�;'
m,� � �.^'� � 1 � i
j� l \-� f � 1• YJ%/�%�i�• ..."..-.� � '�, -..I". ^�M i � r /� f /1 1(� l .J
`a •�' i r � r:%rrr'y/ r � _..+ `^-�,,, Jj � , jf .. ,�'�..
� �' r, '� � fj � �^�� �.. t , »...^.ii�,/���nf��'! ,,,r A' ...,..+^ _�� ""� .!', "'�.,�� r F / •�� ! ! f .o � ��„^...
', � ~ � •- -"� '"'"."`� r� • , � ' � �
't . . 4 ;1 ':r':-:-i f�`.. , � � . .� �i�� .r� I � r,,,� ' '
:,��i. , ' ,� ..,.- : .��.. - ,-� _. -.--;;.;,; ~_` ' ;' � ` � "., `. � i _� � f ..r
,�� \ J`: .'''r�i�.. �,..'�'� .,,r--..... ,�,,,,,_ + � "`�.� r ,� � !r �.
, ..�.` � t ' ,r' . . / , �r�.iJ ' • �'i/� P' � —!'••:. .,., � ' � - �.
'� s,i..� ! 1 . � J , f" T+' �• ". � ^' , ' ` �
�f:%-:;.r..^e`- /�r�'^.-.— ` ...--�_:1" ,,,. , � � . .. { • . �. t
�1', � ... ..::� i:..•:: .; �::''- .,,,._ _= �.%.w,r' � •.=-�-; • r ! �`` : `-'..' i � � � � ? � �
' /. .f.:: y = Y�/ ' : y.r.a . � i
' . • ,,... •..,,,� - ...'r �!;r. j;� r �.�=~"" i! -',7'-• �y,. ` . '� i � . •F_.� `. . t 1' �„
� ,,,. ' � � � �','• •r .�.,,,:�`�,: .�','^=7.;� ^ "ti _ �� 1 � •�� ` ' � � !` , �1`+ •
` '-''� �'" � j `._ /'; ..-- _.� r'- �' �.;se: -; ''f ..-^ -....--•_;,,'-;�, � : .� �"���'� ,! � f �. � �'--.
- ; <' � • ';ti'`''�- ��C�; �.._,_ '� � � ; , �� 1 ', s
_ '. • ` ,....,-. � -.:�.�?. i i � � ` � �^. ._ � 1 „ = '� 'y- �` .
'_ �� � �1 •_ %� �°;i��:�:` -.. � t ,�� 11 j' ,--- '....�� _.� F�; t j �}'S�:.f�.�
�� ��� r-!� � I r � ': t '�i �.�' r � � � � � `. 1 r \ �+ f 1 t; � J w,��
. �, � r •`�t-� r .1 ,1 . ��r• � f / r t .
�::- _ • j;,('�• �:� _ •�;,; ° ;,` `_-' s� �`�il:!`; ' ot ` : `- �; ' ` �'� 11' ^ � O �' ;j�;r' '' �` .
.-'° �[. r • r:•�: t f� :';; � t : � .
..--''�' � _'"': ".. �� ' '/ %%':�' '- ,,, "'1 � ! .i ,�:,i . � i �}i'.c=-'.._:-_.'� .. F `�.. � . ~ 4 ,; �'1 .,'. , •. t. ti �.�i /�T � , I
_ ��__. :�'' \ �,�i:; "� !� ` «»� -� ,` � : f" t `� f. ; (\ �� '
1•_._. ,tS,, . ``, , ►'+.. r"�iJ,•'' v` '"^.! ka.'.. ..r..... `,'La, ,c.-� . • t : t '` ! � t
. � ' J ....✓ • � �` � 1� ! f . ./. ` ` • s � � _ — ,!,:i'. .''+� �.",�.,,f �. `"`T t ♦ b!7 , .. S"" i � 'r` •.^,� `� f�: t ', � i 1 t� ` t`
� f, � . . �fC '�,,, •_ �..'-� ,: 1 i e 1 .._ _ l a'� ; ,� .�t,• • t c `-�,. � . ,,, -�•.•�� \
_� f+ .•!- • 1 ,ya,� a, . % '.� 4 f��''^ ,1` i t , '� ! � J� � ( � ' ': ' ; i ; f . ',��,� t � t { .,y � f '^....
'.�. ♦ �^ •• ,•i,.'� .. _/.�.` � i %%� �'`.l j .-�.:� • r \,� :�y.• t 1
... _.� �; �'��:,,,�� : f� ,f::; "'�' � �� t ��: �.,�`'; , � :
,.. ��:,,. .
. � � :� f v � ;�•" � ' i . } i�� 'y
' r'r� '...%' �� ""�'„ '�1 f' J�` .L\� � ��`. e� r, � . 4 � ; , t`!,_ •> >�` ' � �1t � �'/� ��.
:�,i'' `;��=-=�i. ;`=__ . �' � �� '�!: '` .�,.�`.� ; - } �.li'r�f .` ,. % �;' ' ' ��1� ._',l �`}� `��; %' `��, `
' ! l`:^' - � � ` , ! a , .,`�.`�` 1 / ; r �� � � � ` �. f / `^'
. � -� � �L"�.,._ ! j! ` •: .,.'' ' :�' f �'1�. ��{l��i'y . K !J 1 `�', �� f Ji � . , �1
.. ,,, - ^' . : 1 % } s'` . . ��� - �_:. ' ,' � • 1. 1 r '�
. _-. --- ; ';Y'_;. �;:� � ,������J���'�������� = o ?�� :'� - r�l� �
;,� -- -...:� � ; �`�r�-�=,' ; , •�°�• : ���;* � ;>>:��;�� ' r � ,;' :_. j� , < <.
-•,�� ''- �- ., �',j , � , � �; r r,,, ,��.._.�, �t� � �, : � � , ' , ,
�� �>,..,.ti�— ,,� _ � : ,�.!, r: t ;�i��,� � rf�,;j%:'' ��, ,,'j��u. � , "' i ' ;� :�, ' �, :
ti � t f . � y.~ { .. . r j . t t � ! �i %f� � , / t"�.� i � .} , � � ` ': v'' ' � j �
� % �.~ �� j ` � • � � j' f . � . � � � f �7 � ;�..� ' T � ��' ' �-�
�=. . i , �; =,..,, ...' � ; _ : ��j' . _ �ji
`'_ ... ; : ,'� ' -� .' . i j � � s � � i r � : i .�_-
� `� ""`�•.. :1:.1': ` .t,.�sv .: 'i" :r'_ 1 < <t: � � � '�• , =:1_1 , � . � ` � I` i`:` :\ \,, L � 1, ;� f , / ....
7: � `':.:':'�: ;i '� ,' `�,l} � �. : } J ; � � \' , � . --' ., ,%:;!`r%, .
�� ^ � :�.. � ef'`.� .i-. : f../I �Pa %� s � �` � � � j � .+Z , 1 s• � ,.,' � s'l. i,r `
:1 ' , ...c. ; i \ "`�.. f } t t "
' ,� 1 -"t`�}' ` , t, ' ',;,�. �'.�,, .r..! � �,, 1 . i : f , ��� {1. �.. ,
�� 1 \ • l 1 ` '� '� \ 1 \ � + f tt :r ! ~ '.,*.�`+..
•�t ```, �`� i'���` : ` ',�+ • : '\� .L 1 ( .�(�' i 'r.
i ..�..- ' / _� t' f r ♦ \' � f t, � ' i %
V��
� �F � . � . � , '' ,I^,� �� �� 1- � .f�+ i i:
.0 ' `�� ���` � �rt � � r ! �
� �!,�-, . . _ ` . l '� . i y,
.��Dp �.�. -. :,,,, ,1 ` ;''�._.' ;-= ; � t � ='1; ; �
Na • T� -�.�,I ; . ; ,. ` ��. , ��-� �' i = � {
. �5— .� �`� ��TS .� ' - - � .
�. ,' � ,� 1 �. �
�
September 1, 1995
. C ity o�
1Viendota Heights
Mr. Alden Landreville
1010 Sibley Memorial Highway
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Landreville:
Your request for Variance, CUP and Modified Critical Area Review will be considered
by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on
Tuesday, September a, 1995. The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here
at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on
attending the meeting in order that your application will receive Council consideration
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
� 1� � �I�j ,�
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
cc: Ken Nordby
Nordby and Associates
245 East Roselawn Avenue, Suite 30
St. Paul MN 55117 � ��
Joseph Griesgraber
Star Builders
999 County Road I West
Shoreview MN 55126
�
e
�
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • v5118 452 • 1850
�
PLANI�TING REPORT
DATE: �
CASE NO:
APPI.ICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PREPARED BY:
1\t't il�i'llF:\ 1 L•7)
CONSULTINC PLANNERS
LANllSCAI'E ARCHITECTS
3U() FII2ST AVENUE IJORTf�
SUITE 211)
A1INNEAP<�!_iS, MI�; �5-llll
612•:i3y•3.'il)U
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
Background
July 25, 1995
95-13
Joseph Criesgraber, Star Build�
Homeowner Alden Landreville
1010 H'ighway 13
Variance for Second Garage,
Stcucture Conditional Use Pe
Critical Area Review
C. John Uban
The subject property is a 4.5 acxe su�gle f�y lot along H'ighway 13. The site falls withi
Area of the 1Viinnesota River and must go through a Modified Site Plaa for Crirical Area :
submitted plan shows a proposed second garage for storage of yard and recreation
addition to the eadsting three and one-half car garage built onto the home. The plaa
proposed swimming pool, but that was not addressed in either the narrative, or the a�
The site is more than four acres in size and would allow a 425 foot accessory structure as
use. The proposed shucriue is 728 square feet. Thus, the stiucture must go through the
Use Pernut process as well as the Critical Area Review. This process requires a greaf
informatioq which was not supplied SpeciSically, grades, topography, and existing veg�
not noted on the plan The best information available to the Planning Commission is th
sketch fumished by the City planner with the application. �
This applic�tion has been accepted by the City and 10 days have transpired since the f
submitted. New 1Vlinnesota State law allows only 60 days for a City to review and eit
deny an applicatioa If an application is not complete, the City must notify the appL
within 10 days. The 60-day time table does not generally leave enough fune
Inc.
�
; Critical
;w The
�ment in
shows a
permitted
deal of site
tation were
; small area.
catton was
approve oc
t in writing
additional
July 25, 1995 Case 95-13 Page 2
i�nforntafion to come back ta the City after it has been reviewed by #he Planning Corr�missian If the
City daes not iake acctian wittuin the 60 days, the proposed item is automatically considered approved
by State law. This will farce cities into de�ying applications wi'thin that 60-day periad ifadequaie
information is nat fumished. The City's review pracess may have to be amended to accommodate
this new law enacted Jaiy I, I995.
Notices have been maiied and a public hearing v�rill need io be convened for this applicaiion.
Conditionai Use Permit and Variance for Second Garage
The applicant has suggested in earlier staffmeetings tl�at additionai space would not fit architeciurally
.attached ta the home. The propased garage consists of two garage bays with aa access door in
between The general design, materrials, and color match the existing stnzctu�e.
The site is £�iziy large and based on the placemeat o£the stzucture, it wauid not be notic,eabte to the
public trave,ling on H'ighway 13, The closest point to the adjacent properiy line is 45 feet. There are
trees alang tius property Iine. The stcucture as prapcised wautd probabty have a�unimal impact on
the gcading, dra:�nage, and erosion of this very large single f�mily home site. rTo material was
submitted to conEum that na gradiztg and minimai trce remavai is necessary far ihe construction of
this garage.
Critical.Area Review
Because this is a large site that has already received a Site Plan Review for the main s�tnechue, this
requ� c�n 1�e eonsidered a Madifi�ci Site Ptan. However, the�condition of the site as it pertauins ta
grades, drainag� e�dsqng vegetation, and construction teGhniques have not been submitted and
certainly, nathing has been submitted for the swimnuag paol other than a dimensioned locat7iiaa on
the srte. The applic�t was givea �Il of the required cha �klists and the required matterial has not been
forthcoming. Without more deta�ed information, the Critical Area Review cannat be made.
Aciion
�
Ho1d a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council.
Considerations
1. The new law does allow the City to extend the review penad for up to an additiona160 days
if the applicant is notified in writing.
�
4
.�1.��.�►
�1 �T O�
1��.endo�a Hei . hts
Al'PLICATION FOR CONSIDERA.TION
PLAPINING REQUEST
Case No. _�ti�
Date af A 2icat"ron `
Fee Paid �:tx''.�.�
S�,y�2 •Qa. /�.�'s ..Z—,s�
ApplicantName: GRt�,S'6Rr�Q,�2 = �.cE,v�- �"' PH: �&'3
c�t) i��) i�
Aaa�: �� � 1�.�'wE� r .�S �,��«.� �K. �
jNumber & s�eec} tt�ty) tstate) tZip)
Owner Name: �r��� �+� A tL� vt2 � cj,t �/�� t�L tfErv
{tast) (F'irst) t14Il}
Address: 3 .0 s iit/
(Number & tre�t} " (Gity►) (st�te) ("�.�P)
Streei Locatiou of Progerty in Questian; /l� /d , j�,� ,, f��
Lcgai Description of Pmperty:
c��
r
Z`ype ofR,equest:
Rez.oning �� Variance
Conditional Use Perrmit Se�bdivisiou Apgmval
• Conditional Usc Peimit far F.0 D. W Weilands Permit
Plan Apprnval � (7th�r (attach explanat
Compmheasive Plan Amendment
Agplicable City Ordin�wce Nwnber Section
P�sent Zog�ng.c�f•Pmper�` Preseat Use � . .
Pnapased Zoning of Froperty �„_,,,_, Pmposod Use
I hemby dec� that titi s'tateme�ts mad� ia tius r�qucst and the �dditt
' materi�ii are icu� .. � � r..l � ��� ...1.,�r St ,�
t�)
(Rec;eived by - TitiC)'- "
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, ,NiIY - 55i18
�
. -.�::
.�...� ..,
is5a �
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
NOTICE OF HEARING
July 5, 1995
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
- :�
NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of Mendota Heights will
meet �at 7:30 o'clock P.M., or as soon as possible thereafter, on Tuesday, July 25,
1995, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 �ctoria Curve, Mendota Heights,
Minnesota, to consider an application from Mr. Joseph Griesgraber� of Star Builders,
Inc., for a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Structure and a Variance for a
Second Garage on the following described property: .
All that part of Govemment Lot 3 and the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 23,
Township 28, Range 23 described as follows:
�� Commenang at a point 620 feet North of the SW comer of the NE 1/4 of the
SW 7/4 of said Section 23; thence North 654 feet to the center of the St Pau(
and Mendota Road (now known as the Sibfey Highway and as State Trunk
Highway No. 13); thence Narth 51 degrees 30' East along the ce�ter line of
said Road 379 fee� tfience South 889 feet; tfience West 297 feet to the place
of beginning, said premises being also know� as Lot 8, Auditor's Subdivision
No. 2, Mendota.
More particularly, this property is located at 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway.
This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Such
persons as desire to be heard with reference to the request for a Conditionai Use
Permit and Variance will be heard at this meeting.
Kathleen M. Swanson
' � City Clerk
Auxiliary aids far disabled persons are availabie upon request at least 120
hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of
Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this
may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administrator at 452-
1850.
e
f a � ��
♦
.l►. � .l►
Juty 2C}, 1995
M
1
1�iiendo�a Hei
a
�
Mr. Joseph Griesgraber
Star 6uiidi�ers, tnc.
599 County Road t Wesfi
Shoreview, MN 55126 �
Oear Mr. Griesbraber:
Your application for a Conditional Use Permit and Variance will be considered b.y the
Planning C+�mmission at their neact regularly scheduled meeting, which wil! b hetd on
?uesday. Ju1y 25. 1995. The P[anning Commission meeti�g starts at ?:3 o'ctock
P.M. here are City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, ar a representative sh utd ptan
on attending the meeting, in order that your appticatian wili receive Co mission
consideration.
If you have any quesfi�ns, ptease feel free to contact me. _ _ --
Sincerely,
��� �����.�� �- � .
1�,��,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant �
KLB:kkb
Enclosures
t4
�
,'` . 11U1 Vietoria Curve •,1Viendota, Heights;lVi1'�t'•��55118 ��� 45�•1850
�as ��:u���
�Q �Y��d.�;
��� �������
�� �-� 1 �..�
c�.t Ci'� �1�t'1�.5��'12Ya k3�.1�'
,. l�•�j`�en � ��-' ?� ?�
�
�
�
�ip�� M , + �
` � 1 �� ��` .� .,� 1
� � 1 • ` ��„ • . 3 ti ii
,� � ` �1 ` t , ~'` �..""', 1 �
$��►`•��, '�'`�. �'•, � v
"`1�� ,• ��� � `,..1 �'rtt•�156'.�;ti�*"
�,.u`'�� .•`ti `` �• "`-•.; •y • � �
ti � • ti�,�1 �•,.,,, •► 1 ��
j"',�` �'� ;�� ».� '�„ � �`r►� { "1
' f .l',>>` �1��` 'r',"` 1�' �,~�.� ,y ± � � },.
� ,1 � �.'"`�,► , .. �„► ti` �,� � � �'� • '� t • ••
� � �ti � � �
.
�� ti. �
. l ,-"•. �`�`: ��11`��► ti�� �� � i t t ��
t� j ' `4.� t+`�"�`1 i i �� i
�
i � '�;��' � � 1��� t i �
i
`j .���o��f1r � ri r i� ! 1,� r
� /i � J d � � �4?� °,`�C
�.'�.. �. � � i "r f� f� �' � � j 'y t �� + � �
Ata'? 1 �.: : / +' ..;.� � �
...___ ��''—� .... _.1. _f_.,...._t•y.�
. �� �
� �
��,�{ i ' �'� �f! ,
`'�n i ,� ! f 1'
r'r `, �`1 i � i � f+
� � �ti t1 i
r" '"r � � /i�1 , 1'� � � � • 1
,- .•' � 1, j � �} �'`•
t
T'` `,� 1 � ���r �►
7ti y t i '�����\
� i r ' i � ��
p• .� E j t � t
N!t ��,-�' j � I
. j
�.�, 7 J l r''�v„ r%' 1`
! , t I ��,� ` r
i0,: r� t, f j lp�,,r� y i �
/
%jf '!'� t l�
. _ .. •
R � r��—•:,,;,; ;/..1�'0.8
.
� � y
�� ��...�---- ti .
hl.Z CiiaC paact af G�uear�uant Lot 3 aild �lte NE ljk of�tl�� SW 1/4 aF SeaCion Z3,
Tvwrss��ip �8, �iange �3 ctasc��.bad a� �olxows:
�t�au�encing at a poisi� 6Zti F�et NaxCh o� Ghe sotst�tiyr�st carner o� Cl�e NE ��k ar� the
SW 114 of s�id SecCi�on 2�; Chence Hoxrl� b5�i �`Qa� �a the caatez �� t:sa 5�. kaul ancl
�leus�ata Koad �aarr know:i as� the S�b�cty �tigi�way �ssd �ts St�ta Txunk I�i.ghsr�ay No. 13�;
thcnce Nortli 5i �da�rr�aes 3i? �u�.nu��s ��sC aloizg C�ia 4cn�er I�,na of sa�d Roar1 �79 feet;
ti�an�e South S89 £ce�C; �Gtie�tcfi West 2�7 lactt to �hc pisccr o� b�Einnfng. sa�d prorniaas
boing ��,so knocm �s Lat S, J1ud�[Co�Cts S�rbcliv.�sivrs I�o. 2, tie�cloC�,. DakoCu CaanCy
i�i�cinesota�, ac�cirxd�sj� t� �Itc Gov�ritmerr� Survcty tiiccreaL-.
�
�! I ��re6y �eer-�`���y' �hrarf �'his p1c�n, St��"ve�y or �`epor� r-t/c7s �t�'�vtYr-ec� -- ,�. �', �'1Jf� �' �'�1V.
��J�/ mE or �rnjcr�'er r»��'�}�/� ��"r���` sr��vjLt�Y)�sror� ��3c� �`hjr�f Iry c/�r» c� +�'ul�y L�1t/i3 SU�2�r�Y'�Dh�S
JiYl.nf'C�����1 f�i"tiIi �s/ilHi�/l�fy//'�Y1 ii!'il1(�iM ♦�Ii �i1T�/iII1 A� 1i�• i.i.w��w ��+� � �
O L.c��v ��i.. i�- �c..�� Yv �- � ru: G'� ��� ?J t����,
.
�a �� ��� �� � � �
� ��� �
� ��� � l� � � 1-� �S y��,Z,. . ,
. � •
.
CtTY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�
29, 1995
�
a � � .
Mayor, City Council and City
Kevin Batchetder, Administrative
SUBJECT: Case No. 95-14: Cruz - Variances
DISCUSSNON
Mr. Cruz and his Attorney, Richard Gabriel, appeared at public he�rings
conducted at the July and August Planning, Commission meetings to request
variances that would atlow a driveway to remain and a recreational vehi !e to be
stored within their required side yard setback. The variances are, a five foot (5')
side yard setback for the driveway and a variance to Section 21.4, to at ow
autside starage of a recreational vehicle within the required ten foot (10 ) side
yard setback, (Please see attached Apptication and Planner's Report}.
This case was brought to #he Planning Commission fol[owing co
from adjoining neighbors. At the July public hearing, Mr. Gruz and his
agreed ta a continuation to allow time to work on a compromise. At tl
meefiing, Mr. Cruz proposed a cedar fence ta be constructed along the
1ine. The neighbors apposed this sotution. The Planning Commission �
agreement that there was no hardship established as a basis for a vari�
RECOMMENDATION
laints
;ighbars
August
�
The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to close the public hearing. he
Ptanning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend that City Cauncil based o a finding
of fact that there is a lack of hardship deny the requested variances for riveway
se#back and outdoor storage.
ACTtCJN REQUIRED
Meet with the applicant and then if Council desires to imptement
Planning Commission recommendation, pass a motion to deny the requ�
variance and direct staff to prepare the appropriafie resolutian of denial.
KLB:kkb
.
,.
• j
,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 17, 1995
TO: � Planning Commission
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire
SUBJECT: Case No. 95-14: Cruz - Variance - Continued Hearing
DISCUSSION
Mr. and Mrs. Richard Cruz, of 1338 Cherry Hill Road, appeared before the
July Planning Commission meeting to request a side yard set back �variance that
" would allow them to continue to store their recreational vehicle in their side yard.
At the Planning Commission meeting , the Commission felt that if the Cruz's
were given time to discuss alternatives with their neighbors that maybe a
compromise could be arrived at. The Cruz's agreed to meet with their neighbors
and to return back to the Planning Commission meeting in August.
On Thursday, August 17th, Mrs. Cruz informed staff that they are still
waiting to hear from their neighbors regarding a compromise. ��
ACTION REQUIRED
Conduct the continued public hearing, discuss with the Cruz's and their
neighbors the results of their negotiations and arrive at a recommendation to the
City Council. �
JED:kkb
/ r
�
�: �
PLANNiNG REPORT
DATE:
CASE NO:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PREPARED BY:
co�rsu�.�rt�t; �>�.�:�r�E�ts
LANi�SCAPE ARCI�ITECZ'S
300 F{RST AVENIJL- !vU}:l }1
Si3]i"E 21{}
MINNEAPC7LIS, MIV 55<a01
�>>2�a.�9�.��oci
PLA1�T1�T�tG CONSIDERATIONS
Background
July 25, 1995
95-14
Richard Cruz '
133$ Cherry I-�ill Road '
Setback Variance for Driveway d StoraDe
of Recreational Vehicle
c. rann v��
Mr. and Mrs. Richard Cruz who reside at 1338 Cherry I3ill Road received notificati�
Berg, Mendota Heights Code Enforcement Qfficer February 6, 1995 that the storage ai
home was not in campliance with Section 21.4(1) o£the Zoning Ordinance. Consequer
seeking a variance for a driveway seiback and storage of a recreational vehicie as it pez�
existing candition: The setback required for the starage of a recreational vehicle is 10
setback for a driveway is 5 feet. Because of the position of ihe hame on the lat, the side
10 feet at the narrowest point. There is not enough raom an either side to meet the reqL
setback and have room to park the vehicle on the side ofthe house. The home is Io
Cherry I�'ill cul-de-sac with the back partion of the lot abutting Wachtler Road. Th
conditian exposes both the frant yard and rear yard to the public and makes apprapria
the rear yard area difficult.
Althaugh a copy af the surveyor's certificate showing the placement af the home and dr
submitteti, there was no si#e drawing indicating the actuai piacement af the side yard d��
existing storage area. The written material indicates that a 10-foot wide pad was bui
property line at the time of construction atthaugh this wouid have been caught by Paul
been shown on the Building Pernut Plans. This is an exasting non-canforming conditi
appticants seeking variances to continue the storage of theu recreational vehic2e. Althaug
no specific request for the amount of variance requested, I am assuming they w�ill need
frarn Paul
leir motor
y, tt�ey ��
ns to their
;et and the
ard is only
ed 10 foat
ted on the
"thru" lot
storage in
eway was
�eway and
up to the
erg had it
i with the
there was
zero foat
r
July 25, 1995 Case 95-14 Page 2
setback to the side properiy line. No mitigating screening or other conditions were noted in the plans.
Notices have been mailed and a public hearing will be required for this request.
Variance
The City Ordinance requires a five-foot setback for driveways. This allows for screening, snow
storage, drainage, and other activities to take place unencumbered along property lines. The
applicant's letter indicates that a 10-foot wide concrete pad was poured right up to the property line
at the time of construction. The submitted plan does not show any driveway on the side of the home.
The home is set slightly askew on the lot with one corner or the other within 10 feet of the properiy
line. This makes circulation to the rear yard difficult for large vehicles. The rear yard has a 30-foot
setback because of the street frontage on Wachtler. ��
Ordinance 21-4 controls the storage of recreational vehicles in residential districts. The storage is
permitted on one side yard or the rear yard in residential districts. It also requires that all setback
requirements be met and the storage shall not be adjacent to the street. Because the driveway for
storing the vehicle must be five feet from the property line, there can be room for screening by use
of tall plant material, decorative fence, or lattice work at the property line.
The applicants have not produced any plans showing the solution other than to request a variance.
The variance request is for a zero foot setback to the property line for the storage of a recreational
vehicle without any screening.
The width of the home, the placement on the lot, and the fact that it is a"thru" lot makes it difficult
for storage of a large recreational vehicle with appropriate screening. However, it is important that
the solution not become an unsightly nuisance to adjacent property owners. A status quo solution
does not seem reasonable unless a pad can be relocated and constructed in such a fashion as to
provide appropriate screening for the storage of the recreational vehicle. The other option, which
is chosen by many people, is to store the vehicle in a recreational vehicle compound. Off-site storage
is not considered a hardship because there are facilities available in the metropolitan area.
Action
Hold a public hearing and make a-recommendation to the City Council.
r � . � ' • ::-, % � ,1
t ' f f f+Y Y .✓ f J� Y r . � fr �' '.'" -. , fJ �. %I
J `''� � � // +r•,r~- f "`�•• � J�.�i. �
^,`.' l t, fy�,,,./, l:/, f�' �``, j '."�..,.. � i(
f '��^•�- �,%i'f �4' � 1 � !)
��`�',r t , �r ",,� ..,Jr t� tf �. i ..! �l(l:
; j r• � .. . � � ' �
o�� j ;r�~ ";f � �,� ''�...-' � _..� � r
� , y. .
, �r, '� r, . l � J
1 % f ` � 1 !r � � - .-
! � s � r 1 f `'� `� �
l ! � � r � f � �' r
; � ..._._. � >> , _f
�l "`�� � Jr � 1 `�� t
� � , � � / ''r�'' _... ... r �f % ,_• ,.'`
1( j , r ' �i ^ " ` � l� y ' � �� ...._.
t � � ! �.... _....�..—, ;,^' � ' � r r` �„" "^
p Iy�� t t � :' _,...�. " _ , . � J : � �.
i tl r � �
t ; j r"" -"�.�,�'" �.�"� -�`,,, ,.' '� R i
�`�j/--'_.i�� �,; �i'� � ' �� r /
;;1.�"'�..., t ,; __ �r �' : � �.
+'�-'r'�ti �� J� �l� � �_._, r, � ' r` �. f ;� � ``�
l/r .—•1� • � � � .L., � (� '-� j J i
' �' �....�/ ,� � `f , f � Q `—._„ -- wl
.. ,..-• , r ; •-_•,.,�, ry ... ��
���,.. � �y, � •� � ' _ �` ` ..
� �' � J ^ �jl �'� � ; � �"� -�� ;� �:,�.�,� �...
. /� � � . /� — _ , �1 �
'�' r� �,,...! —��`,..,.•r'.."""'r� ' �" �».. _.....�... 1 f.� `' (
�� � � ,,, x:..... -
f ^—" � � ` �
^ l J�� `n ` � t� � �.A..
.�.: - t �.• � t ,.-
�ti..: �-^�, �`�,, P �'R'K � � fv _.-.
`''` � �../' f�' � � �' �-.; � � "..`. -
`� • f �f` > s
� �'"'.- �, .-:: = ..,�'�S�! � � �ti �_ � ''' t>> �
� `
F � CLF _`� ° �\ /� � �,,`� ��- ,
i + .:: / � �
t --.,.. Q /,� �,.%'�'' '� '� � .1
. � -.,, ; � 1 �j, � ` � ��,
,f ! i �~ ^, [ "'.,`.:'�,.. ._ _ 1 f i j � ,�
� _ �:.�:. - �:
� ' I .ti � . ` r C�,.,c,.: • y
) + '"""\ -.......-- -• 'r ,...�
"�. ` i i �.......�,,, S "'. ..r' � .. ..�
Q -�i j�,�r� � �r
1�1 � ����
No �aTA
• �5 - H�I�.�T �
1 �. S
�
�
�
� ''
�*��,����
� �
/r r
�' � �� �'-=a'� � �� �,% �
�' � ■ �_
�r „ :'�-��.�.,..,� � �
�,,,,,!I!� �''�u"""rn:�i�r " • . .��wr
� � _�1��i'R�_.�r'""ii'��
�+' "�i �l�,,� pi �— Q� �
, �
, �, � �
.
,
!9►,rr . � r�'� � + � ,��L'���
r "'�„�� �� ''�• � � 'liii' ,
=�rr��111� �,� �� -� ���:. ..��� �
�
�
Richard F. Cruz and Gloria Cruz
1338 Cherry Hill Road
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
June 8, 1995
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Re: Request for Variance
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We are the owners of 1338 Cherry Hill Road, Mendota Heights,
Minnesota 55118. We are requesting that the City of Mendota
Heights grant us a variance from the setback requirements for the
outside storage of recreational equipment, paragraph 21.4(1), and
for the setback requirements for the construction of a driveway,
paragraph 4.18(5).
Enclosed please find a surveyor's certificate depicting our lot and
the location of our home thereon. You will note that our lot is a
through lot with frontage on both Cherry Hill Road and Wachtler
Road. As such we have no rear yard and, therefore, could not store
a recreational vehicle or equipment except in the side yards.._ In
meeting with the City Planner we stated that the side yards are
only those portions of our property immediately-adjacent to the
sides of our house. While we do not necessarily agree with this
interpretation of the City Ordinance, this would virtually prohibit
any storage of recreational equipment on�our property.
Our house was placed on tiie lot at an angle so that it would be in
conformance with the way our neighbors had located their houses.
Unfortunately this resulted in a rather narrow strip on either side
of our house. Even if we were allowed to use what we consider our
back yard for st�rage, it would be virtually impossible to drive
our motorhome along the side of our house without going into our
neighbors' property. ,
We use our motor home practically every weekend during the spring,
summer and fall. It is occasionally used for winter camping as
well.
We request that we be allowed to park our motor home on the south
side of our house. There is presently a concrete pad that was
poured at the time the home was constructed. This concrete pad
extends to the lot line at its most easterly portion. It is
approximately ten feet in width.
, 4 �
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHT5 PLANNING C4MMISSION
June 8, 1995
2
Because af the configuration of our lot, the placement of
and the double street frontage, we feel. that we havE
hard�hip for the full use of aur property and would, tY
reguest a variance to allow use to utilize the concret
presently aonstructed for the storage of our matorhome.
Very truly yours,
� ,.�I��- �t.�c-t 2..
hard F. C uz loria Cruz
92218�2614.itr
Enclosure
aur home
a real
erefore,
Y pad as
, - C ity o�
. ,., �. � .��.endota Hei�hts
�'�
1
��
� AFPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
AppIicant Name: � v%i �% Z- � f�%I�?�
� (�.�s�) (F'�)
Address: � S' � �/ �
clvumber & streec) , . . ..
�
Owner Name: � 4 '`��- �r d �✓'
p�t}
(City)
{F3rsc}
Case No. ��- � L
Date of Application �� 9.� �y
Fee Paid ,� . � � �3-q ��,7�-�3 � d
��� PH: �-�d <..� T'�� .S`
C�
�, �rz �`� .�,c,. .�",S�/
(State} (Zip)
�
Address. �' i C (
(Number & Street) (City) � (State) (Zip)
Street Locadon of Property in Questian;
Legat Description of Property: .
Tyi�e of Request: �
Rezoning
Conditional Use Permit
Canditiouai Use Permit for P.U.D.
Plan Approval � �
Compiehensive Plan Amendment
i
.t
_-�.. Variance
Subdivision Approval
Wetiauds Permit
�� � Other (attach explanatian)
Applicable City Ordinance Number Section
Present Zon�uug af•ProPerty` Present Use ' �
Propased 2aning of Praperty .; P�t�aposed Use
I hereby de,r,�ane that alZ statements made in tlus request and on the additional
materia� are frue. �
(Signature of 3i ) -
t��i
(Iteceived by - Tide) ' �
. � 1101 Victoria �""w� 2 850 - - . � �;F g. As
, �Curve �1Viendota Heights;��1ViN.����55118.:� 45 _�1
�. - - . - , .-,7 ; . . . . `:",z,.- Y. . .
w 4
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
NOTICE OF HEARING
July 18, 1995
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of Mentiota F
meet at 7:45 o'clock P.M., or as soon as possible thereafter, on Tuesda�
1995, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendol
Minnesota, to consider an application from Mr. Richard Cruz, for a vari
setback requirements for the outside storage of recreational equipment
variance from setback requirements of a driveway on the following
property:
Lot 5, Block 3, Cherry Hills 2nd Addition
More particularly, this property is located at 1338 Cherry Hills
leights will
/, July 25,
a Heights,
ance from
and for a
described
This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Zoning Ordinanc No. 401.
Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the request for Vari nces will
be heard at this meeting.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at
hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, •
Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, hov
may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administral
1850.
:ast 120
e City of
:ver, this
r at 452-
- - - �' � �
C lt O�
. y
.�., , 1Vlendota Heights
September 1, 1995
Mr. Richard Cruz
1338 Cherry Hiii Road
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Cruz:
Your request for Variances will be considered by the City Council at their next
regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday. September 5, 1995. The
Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers.
You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting in order that your
�� .application will receive Council consideration If you have any questions, please feel
free to contact me.
Sincerely,�
�' � � �` �'' `� �� I, 1
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
�
�
�
�
° 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850
T0:
FROM:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
Mayor, City Councii and City Adr
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative
SUBJECT: Case No. 95-19: Lane - Wetlands Permit
DISCUSSION
29, 1995
Mr. Jerome Lane, 2314 LeMay Lake Road, appeared at the August�
Commission meeting to request a Wetlands Permit to install a�fence withi+
hundred feet (100') of LeMay Lake and to install a dock. The Planner had
incorrectly stated that a DNR permit was required for the dock. (Please s�
attached Planner's Report and application).
At the Planning Commission meeting there was a concern expressE
the dock setting a precedent. Neither Mr. Lane, or any Planning Commis
were aware of any other docks existing on the lake. Two Commissioner:
expressed a concern about extending the fence all the way to the water':
however, the majority of the Commissioners felt the impact was minimal.
\\
RECOMMENDATION ��
The Planning Commission voted 3-2 (Friel, Koll) to recommend apK
Wetlands Permit allowing construction of a four foot (4') high chain link :
to the water's edge of LeMay Lake, however, approval was not recommi
the dock.
ACTION REQUIRED
Meet with the applicant, and then if Council desires to implement 1
recommendation, pass a motion approving a Wetlands Permit allowing th
construction of a fence to the water's edge on LeMay Lake. A second rr
deny a Wetlands Permit for the proposed dock should be considered by (
Council.
KLB:kkb
'lanning
one
also
I about
oners,
edge,
of a
up
for
on to
.. .
��� �s Ia� IGs b�
�� ��� �
. �
,
' , , ,� � �; ,
�
� � ,, i�
% � , f � � ��
B � � s . /�- i�• � .
� ,, l /�'
I � �� �I � / � �• ,� � i
�
� i �
�� •
., , ,
/ • �/ ♦ �� � t � .' i /
� � ; �
�� � . ,
, , ,,� ,
� • . • � .• • f� �- .�� /.
l ,, � � %% � ji � ,
�' ,
/ �
.� '� � �' � �! .,I//� �.
� . �
� /
.-..-
�
/ il�'� � •13��/ �
i . . ' � �� . ' . . , ' i,
� 1 � � � Ai /
� . � .. � ,, .
. � � i
t: � �/ 6 , ,� � .
, // / / / /
,�, , � � � i
. . .,
. � � � /� %/ �►� ,
o � / / , � � �/ /
i
! � ,
\ /
a r - .� �
�� �� ' •
_ o
�
C'Ci:�.`:l.�Li'i:•.;.; i'LA\^.I:I:�
I_Ar.,.i1c.,••iil• �J�C;}ii"If(,'i.:
.iUU 1'i1:tiT i�\'f_:�l:L :�t)I:I'll
SUITL' ?lU
�\11ti!�EAPi)LiS, i\4t� ��•!nl
(,1= ; i�)• i.il:ii
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:�
CASE N0:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PREPARED BY:
PLANNIlVG CONSIDERATIONS
Background.
August 22, 1995
95-19
Jeremy Lane
2314 LaMae Lake Road
` Wetlands Pernut
C. John Uban
Mr. Lane desire,s to conshuct a fence on his side lot lines running down to the waters e�
Lake. Sewer service was installed aeross his rear yard as part of the Fudong project in
yacd was dug up and re giaded at that time. Some fencing was removed and not r
proposed fencing within 100 feet of the lakeshore extends the existing fence and repl
the fencing that was removed. �
Signatures of consent have been submitted by Mr. Lane's neighbors and the, Planning
may waive the required public hearing.
Wetlands Permit
af iaMae
►2 and the
.ced. The :
� some of
The proposed fence is 48 inches chain link fen�e located in Mr. Lane's rear yard on b th the north
and south properiy line. Gates are proposed to allow access through the yard. The is a shared
driveway with a neighbor which will not be blocked and the fencing will be kept a y from the
driveway so that snow can be stored without damaging the fence. No vegetation ' be removed •
with the constnuctioa of the fence.
Mr. Lane also is proposing to install a dock at the lakeshore. The shoreline is suitable for dockage
but require a DNR pernu� No detailing of the dock was submitted. However, a gene description
is included in Mr. Lane's narrative. Mr. Lane desires to have the dock included in he wetlands
n
August 22, 1995 Case 95-19 Page 2
permn� The planner knows of no precedence or policy on dockage for LaMae Lake since it is totally
a private lake without public acoess. The City in the past has not approved docks in wetland
conditions.
Action.
Review applicant's request and make a recommendation to the City Council.
m
�
.
e
�
..
C�� ! � ' ", ` `�I , � , `l , ' 1 � ,\\�� � �a
r", � j ! I � ,.�:�i� \ � � �,,,. ',�-.�. l� `� `�� `� � \� �
,� �''1� i 1 �( , "� �' 1�` t .,'��\ , �\ . � .
t 1 � � , \� \ '��,� ► �,�� \ ,• .
..... ;` r . , � � - - - '�� � ���t � IC � ��t���,.
--� til� ,,.- � ',� � � �i,� , �' �\� �� �\� \�..� .
�� �.. � � � ' � ` ` --- -
� �. � �. , � 1\' \��, � �� . �... ---.
• � �` � �„ ,1� , �.� � , `� { ,`�� _ `•� �� � ` :..-- ;'= �-.. . �'�
�, .1 ,� � [�j .'� ��� . 1 � �� ,� � `� � � ;11 ;1 �`�.,... _�... �
. ,. �� �---�.:....r„ � 1 �e` •. � �1: i t� c , �... ,�: . � �``�
; , �� � � " "',`.,..-�.. -r= . ;`�` �' ;� � �� \��` ti 1i� ! -�--; �.
�-. , � � � �, � � �
_� y '� �_ ',' - '�. "� • �1,! ��� � II �•�\�i\l 4 ;1 �".r�' `,�•
'� `` �'' 1 ' , ' , � \` ''1! 1 , � f ^S! \i`- � �•M,�,\ •\
��..�\ �./',.^.. '� 1 � � � � �y l ,i��� .� li � ��1', `��`�^ �� `� '' l,.
` � �, � ... `�` \ `, �', 1 ` ``` �` '��'� 1 ��`�`� ';�... \ ��` � �
i c ��� — , --....- , , � �l .;E,,,,,1�l ; ��, ��o`�'�� J � ( � �
� ����. , . � , � 1 S, �; + ���,; !� � •ti.:\���• '•� � r•�
r � � � � ,
� , `��/ � � : ; ���� ; �� \ , ����\ .�_ /
, � .� � �
,•-- '�,` ,� � ,+-�.� � -� �-. ,\ - - � - - - � , ���\1 `�, ��� �`:��,��•..�.�,.� _
�� � ..-..
/ � � � , � ' �' �- ., ,�'� ��'� �� i!� �� \, ��.\`;..�.._ .
�� r�y"�.��` l � � `• ~� � � ` `\\`�\\\\�\\\\\ �```` � `i.�,,. I
\ , ;� ;, ;- �.,..�_ :j � .1 ,,/�> . , �,��,\.,.,�,,,�.,��.�; �.�.�\�_.._
"r"` t � � 1 % „ / � � � \� �� . � � �j � ��. �4. .
( 1 � r•' � � ' �' ' / :•�` .` �\����\`' i � ��� �, �
\� i �-•�.
,y \�i! � ' �� � ? i �5��`��\�\;i 1�� 1 ���ti �,
� ��' \ \ `\��f i ` �� � � j � :
� ' � � � � .. � � ` l` ` �,1`,� S i��, '� (i � i � �
�` � � , ��, �, _ � 5���`��tit�;�1� � �� � l � �
� �--_� � �,��: 1,1 '; �,, '�\ \./ J �
� 1 � ��, r-, , 1 �• � �����1��'�` ��.��.- �
� _ � � � .\����i�; ,\. ., �
, .,., i ` , .� ,��i�►� �\�� � \�-, t
�,� , � `` ���� `.�f � �\� ��� �� ���\ � � �
\`� \ - .. 1 � � ` . `'r\�;;�``�;, ` �.'`�- � 1 i
ti� ,�' �, � i ► _ �: � ��\ � \� �ti {
�—�—'/�-'� ..r..V- - � . ��•. �-.�i — ,''���� �� � � � � �
�� , -- (f l �, � �� EG7 PROPERTY � ��:�,1\���1 �� `�. � �i
..� '�.�`- ` \ .... � �\�� �� ti�� ��� J
�''�. •• / 1 \ 's• `;��`•'��;���� �i� ��\ �
� �- -% � j � � ��� \� �\ �� �� ,�
� ., � � , . .. ,, .�,....� �` ` � � �'���` \�`�\ ���
t � i ....` ...a; '" ;: i � . � �
��� f •�„Y�„^�,;,..�., � , ..: �•, �
7 ,� j /r�,� � � �r- �, -_._..�•� � c �� � `�`�'����. .��� ,
�., � ` � ����f � / � r" ...-�'' "��� �' ..�- I I �.;`.,.\ `�� 1� ` �
� �.;.,�,, / l , • �` � 1 �l `� ..����., \, ` � `� '` � ; ��\��\`\�1, 1 `;
� "`•.... '�.. �/ �/ � _,; � `\.,. � � /� /r.. —'\�� ;� �� \\ Y:� . ` � `� ' _ � . � .,\\ ` `,\`�\i�\R�
..,,,: '�.,` �� ,-' � C" ` / /"',.,_..� � � • •� � ; ^t`�i� = ;� � �` �1 �.,-._
.� , '� _� % � �
„ � , � f � � l ' \ f � .� ;' ��'� \ `....�� �.. �,\�.._ �; ��.r���,:..�
,� � 1 �- (�� � J �`. �•�t�i � ,G�' �. � •-.`_ '�� ��\ ��:';
� � � � (I �.�...�'�.. � .' � �-`� � � � i . � � ,� �`; �..�` • --.,.�� 1 � \ ' ;��=.
� f � � \� �.._.`� , / /��� �` �� \ \�, ,V �, \ � � .�''� ,� �� /1 } � � ` •.� � i
~"�.. `� J � � � ~ \� \ ` 1 f �� ! r' � .i/.+� �J � y ,1 \
"� �' .------.---.r.�..- � /� 1� '`�\ � ��;• � 1 � ,.:� , f��. ,...� ! , :
-•. � ' ,� ,.
�,� .�...1 ` � � 1 � ��j ,��" - •-. I i �� � � �
1 1� \��� � \ � ��: �" �� ' . .� f 1 � . ` �
i' ; � 1 '` \���„ � � ' } 1 � j � �r; '� •,..' ": � � .., ,.._.. �i i ,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �
. �
Case No. �5-1� �
��
.,��
scua � � ,�� e�.�
� C i�y a� '� �
1��e�,data Heights
- APPLYCATI4N FOR C4NSIDERATION
4F
PLANNING ItEQUEST
.
t �
. . . • . . . � . � :�I��
• w �► :�' y's ..F►�
Applicant Name. .� � L1 P... �� l�`1�?`�t �= � 'Pii�: G t a - �{� � — /� �
- (I.ast? (F'�) C�
�
�
f�tY) <s�)
OwnerName: �,��'.f� _ s�ct�arr,r- ,�} •
{I.ast) fF'ust) {MI}
Address: J c'�%!?�
(Numbex & Samet) <'�'Y) t:�) (�P)
�: • :��� • • s►. � i .,�►�� r /! �
/ � 1 1 • 1 • � � �.�!!�i ! ���._� � .. r
`Fype Of Request:
Rezaning
Couditional Use Femxit
Conditianal UsePesmit forP.U.D.
, Plan Approval �
Comprreliiensivc Plan Amendment
APPlicable Cily Onlinance Number
Vaziance
Su%tlivision Appmvat
,,,�_ Weilands Permii .
Athtr{attach explanation)
Section
Present Zoz�ng.�f�PragerEy Present Use � -
Proposed Zoning of Properiy : Pt+�pased Use �
I hermby de�are thai ali staoemeats madc in this request and on the addidonal
materiai arc true. ., • . .
t ignatiue af App2ic�at} .
. , — �'r�/�� l�J »
• ��)
��CCI{►� bjr - Tl�� ` .
� 1101 Victoria Curve •,�V�endota Heights,; N�:N • 55118:;�: ����45�•185fl
♦/►.,� .►t
August 17, 1995
• �
1� O�r � �
,��iendot�►, Hei hts
Mr. Jerome L.ane �
2314 LaMay Lake Raad
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
C?eac Ntr. �ane:
Your application �or Wetlands Permit wili be aonsidered by tfie Planni�g
at tfieir ne�ct regularly scheduled meeting, which wilM be held on uesda
'�995. The Pta�ntng Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'ciock P.M.
Hall i� the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on <
meeting, in order thai your apptica�ion wili receive Commission car�sid�
If you have any questions, please feef free to contact me.
Sincerely, .
� , . . .
. � � � �, ` �
� �� � � � ,
Kimberiee K. Blaeser
Seniot� Secretary
Enclosures
�
�
are City
dinq the
1101 �ictoria Curve -1Kendota Heig�it;s,lViN�- 55118 45 •1850.. .
C lty O�
.�.. , 1Viendota Heights
September 1, 1995
�
Mr. Jerome Lane
2314 LeMay Lake Road
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Dear Mr. Lane:
Your request for a Wetlands Permit will be considered by the City Council at their
next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, September 5, 1995.
The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council
Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting in order
-y that your application will receive Council consideration If you have any questions,
please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
' � � � ` �'� '�� � � � 1 1
Kimbe�lee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
,..
a
�
�
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Vien:dota Heigh�s," �1ViN • 55118 -.: 452 • 1850.
: � - .'. . ..�,-. .� �- ry .
;�
-�
July, 21,1995
Gentlemen,
This is an intent to file application for a wetlands permit which I understand
necessary to be made part of a building permit for the installation of a dock
fence on my property at 2314 LeMay Lake Road.
It is my intent to extend the existing chain link fence along both sides of my
property to the shoreline of LeMay Lake. (Please note map.) As you can s
this property extends over half way across the lake.
This fence is being installed not only for protection from roaming dogs and
children, but also to try and minimize liability. As part of this intent, I would
install a dock as well.
We have numerous children, four years of age and under who are often
unsupervised, and to which a dock could be an attraction. The older childr
causing damage, as are the dogs, to the shrubbery. I realize this fence ma
keep the older children out, however, it is the smaller ones that I am conce
about due to liability.
nd
�e
ike to
n are
not
�ed
The dock will be pressure treated vuood, vuith steel posts 2" in diameter. S me
posts will be driven and some will have pads. It will be in the shape of "T", 0' on
all sides.
In closing, I must say as a 32 year resident of Mendota Heights, I find this
process not only expensive and cumbersome, but terribly invasive. The
contractor as well as all the signature's question this whole process. There
request the City Planner to recommend to the City Council this request for
variance, and a Wet Lands permit be issued to me.
Very Truly,
Jerome A. Lane
enclosure
re, I
z ��
�
� ,a1►.1�,�1
lty O�
1Vi.e��.ota. H� ight�
TO: The Planning Cammi�sic�n, City of Mendota Hei
FRcJM: Praperty owners of 2'� i`-� �Ew��-.�.,/ �,r,R. �
6
�
w�-c_ t.._� U, -e
�f
� �'a1 � �c�.•T!tl4.-, � .
�S tC�r""w-t �'�'_��t
We the undersigned have reviewed the plans for .{.��C
;�.� ��,,,...e C-�- �-e., : and understand the terms a:
canditions af the requested v.���� {.,1� ¢-{ u. w�-:
:: � � a V� nc Q�j ecii.ons to this request and do hereby g.
wri.tten cansent and consent to waiver of public heari:
Sincerely,
�� C�-./�-� L `�'
: our
Np1IE (Please Print) SIGNATU!RE ADDRE S(INC':C,. LOTl
� �X G��4a�1 DA-� � ,��-� �G�"� �.'� �".v d �nJ
r —i1�
� �^� _ ��� j-�.�.��� � ��
Yv,�.,-e-tJt� � � .��- c�-�.� �� �1 , . � - I�s
"'�u1b�a7�-� � �i4�J �, ��"'�.,1:-� � ,��J.-%�,� 1 �
. ,
`f-
♦ � � / a r �� i
I
t
r► r , � t , , f � � ,
r � , '� - i
ii' � � � 9 ./ � ...�//liL�w .:-, %� — �
������
___
fl�.QU� ��c��rga. �u�v� • ����o�a �e�g,l��s, �I'� - �����
v
v
; „ , ��:
� ' � ' �
�•�'�'�'�' �'�'������'�'�'�'�' ♦�'������������'
►�����i������������D����♦ ♦�������
♦ •�����.������.���������♦ 0���♦ �♦
f��i1f ♦�1� ��`�'►�► ..t�C'�`�i♦ ����`����
�������' :��: ► � ► � ►��, t► �� •.�►�� ►��� � � ���►�1������� �������
��� / � � ► � ♦�� / �♦ � ♦ � 1►♦ ♦�1�
i�%i�i;%�i���%iA����%.��%i�%i�i�+,i!i��iir��ii�s i�o�o''i�i�i�
�������►��+����Y�i��►���r�v���������v����►��►�������W��i��►��1���������1,
��i�������i���i�i�����i�����������i���i���i�i�i�i�i�������i��!
. �
.•
Gopl�er State (1) Call ID �464
Nearesi Interseciing Street _
Hudson Page ,-�
Hudson Grid #
Corner Lot �
Township
Range
Section/G
Name =„� ���� � � ��, v � Date
Spouse '� Job No _
Address �� I� �� ►'�` f-�� �/J�CI—`— �V f`t'1� Salesperson
City I`�Y�.�������� I l�`i County �1�1�� I f 1 State lY' Zip f��I �-% P O.
Employer , f""�-� `��� * , Home Phone `t' � �� " } �� � Terms: 1
5
Job Si1e Address Work Phone � �
Work Phone (Spouse)
' C
QUANTITY DESCR IPTION
��-k � � � � � � G( ��C� , � r�� ( I
�' ` (ti i il C" ( '1
.
I� 3' � J r(. �v A f�l� >4 -t
�- K�� �- !� J r� �
� 'i'�iZ.Vt�i I �ll �1� L �D S S
v (� � � �`� 1 � •, t.� �h���
. 0 �J {
� ------
' �(� G � ��� � ��
;
SZ� <
��
i L �- 1'Y�rET�i7 i;
�
� v N cl�.�. r�_
1u k�s -
4 �.�n�_
#
1 , 9 9.�
% Down
%^5tart-Up
ance To Installer on
>mpletion
tomer Initials
Price
Down Payment: Check # .^t_ Ami. _ Date
Credit Card � Expiration Date
DP � PS � BC � ALL �
A SERVICE CHARGE of 1�/s% per month (18% Annually) will be applied
on all �past d0e balances.
The purchaser shall be responsible for any and all collection and •legal costs MATERIAL AND INSTALL TION .
incurred by Midwest Fence in the event of this bill becoming past due. TAX
Midwest Fence reserves the right to lien ihe improved property if payment THIS ESTIMATE VALID FOR 30
in full as agreed to in this contract is not received. DAYS FROM ABOVE DATE OTAL
Owner responsible for showing correct property Midwest Fence & Mfg. Co, shall furnish only the material and labor
�d fence lines, for removal of obstructions to specified in this contract. Any changes made from the above speci-
ice installation, obtaining permits and identi- fications necessitating additional material or abor will be billed at
�ying underground cables. � Midwest Fence & Mfg. Co.'s current retail p ices.
stomer
� Form 2— Rev. 7-93� Salesperson's Signature
ture
��
Date
v
:,
�
C1TY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�
. August 29, 1995
Mayor, City Council and City Adminis
K�vin Batchelder, Administrative Assis t�
SUBJECT: Case No. 95-22: Slater - Wetlands Permit
DISCUSSION
�
Ms. Bi11ie Stater, af 2484 Pond Circie East, appeared before the F
Commission to request a Wetlands Permit to continue and finish a land:
project that had aiready begun. This project includes a playhouse/struc
sets of waoden stairs, vegetation removal and vegetation replacement.
see attached Planner's Report and Application).
The Planning Commission expressed concern for the tocation of
structure. Chair Dwyer was concerned that approving a project after t
could establish a paor precedent. Ms. Slater was encouraged to consi�
alternative locations, outside the protected one hundred foot {100'} w�
boundary, for the playhouse. The Planning Commissian recommended
Wetlands Permit not be granted but that the landscaping, sodding and
remain. -
Despite #he Planning Commission's recommendation, Ms. Slater i
that she can still abtain a Wetlands Permit for her project. She has sub
letter, in response to the Planning Commission's recommendation (Plea:
attached ietter dat�d September 1, '1995).
• �j •
The Pianning Commission waived the requirement for a pubtic hE
Ms. Slater submitted all the required signatures of consenfi. The Planni
Commission voted 4-1 iNay: Duggan) to recommend that City Councii
Wetlands Permit, as proposed. Ms. Slater was encouraged to relocate
structure autside the one hundred foot i10Q') setback, however, the
recommendation stated that the new landscaping, sod and steps could
constructed.
anning
;ape
ure, two
(Please
ie play
; fact
;r .
ands
his
:eps could
hopeful
nitted a
� see
as
grant a
P��►Y
n as
ACTION REQUIRED
Meet with the applicant. If City Council desires to implement the Planning
Commission recommendation, they should pass a motion to deny the requested
Wetlands Permit for the playhouse.
KLB:kkb
INf�)RI'UItA'ILS�
COi�'SULTtNC: PLARtNE12S
LAIa'f�SC:APG ARCIi1TEG'TS
30t? FIRST RVEt3tJE I�lOt2TIi
SUITE 21O
MINNEAPOLIS, MN SSA(11
G1�•3.iA�33O{1
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:
CASE NO: �
APPLICANT:
LOCATiON:
ACTIt?N REQUESTED:
PItEP1�1LED BY:
PIrArTNIl�IG COI�I'SIDERA2ZONS
Ba�kground.
August 22, 1995 .
95-22 �
Billie Slater
2464 Pond Circle East
I.ot 12, Biock 4, Hemshire Estat s
Wetlands Pemut
C. Jahrc IJban
I4�is. Biltie Siater, of 2�64 Pond C:ircle �:ast, was cantacted by a Mendaia �-Ieights Code
Officer regarding the landscape project that had been underway in her rea,r yard. Becau
inciuded remaval ofvegetation and the construction of a couple of s�tiuctures inctudi
house and twa set�s of waoded stairs, it was detennined a Wetlands Pernuit was needed.
of the area ha�s ceased untii the Wetlands Pernsit has been camp2e#ed.
Mrs. Stater has received signatures of consent fram her immediate neighbors and
Cammission rnay waive the requirement for the public heax'rng.
Wetlands Permi�
Mrs. Slater is applying for a Wetlands Permit ta complete her landscape project in th
yard. The project started with a need for a safe area for children to play so she had th
aad Gaosebeny removed from her reac yard. She has planted speeies to attract
compteted wood chipping ofthe area to stabilize soii conditions while her children pl�
standing tree house. Wooden risers were created on sloping areas for access to the play
has visited the site and the stairs appear ta be timber with six to eight inch risers and fo�
in width. They appear to have minimal impact to the area.
the project
a play tree
Planning
rear of her
nldlife and
in the free
reas. Staff'
� to siac feet
August 22, 1995 Case 95-22 Page 2
Because existing vegetation had been removed in the construction process, the Wetlands Permit
should recognize the restoration work that has been completed for this back yard project. A patio
is proposed in the back yard but is outside of the 100 foot area. The existing open area of the rear
yard is proposed to be sodded with the rest of the area. completed as a natural landscape project. Play
equipment is within 100 feet ofthe wetland but appears to be close to the home and the sodded area
of the rear yard The natural e�ge to the pond and wetland is propose�i to be maintained with the new
plantings eventually establishing the natural characteristic to the rear yard.
It is apparent that the applicant is tiying to improve the properry and do so with natural vegetation
and sympathetic treat�nent of the prop�ty with minimal impact. The Wetland Pernut should contain
any condifions the Planning Commission feels are necessary to insure the successful re-establishment
of the vegetation.
Aciion.
Review the proposed back yard project with the applicant and make a recommendation to the City
Council on the Wetland Pernut. -
� �..�,,.`,✓ ...1 ,� ��
�` �.,..-.---•
'� ,`�'w�._M�i �, .
,,__ __
t.,.. . ....M_..
N
�u���cr
PROP�RTY
i
�
0
�ITY OF MEND�TA HEI�HTS ��
� ��
�a�se I�To. �5—�2
un�r ��
f
N
� Lett„e of intent re+�ardinq landscape chan=
at 24�ond Circle East, Mendota Heic�hts.
Dear Committee 1Vlembers,
I am v��ri�ing this letter to give you an idea of
th.e changes being made on our property and the �_
reasons behind them. My family and I are rela�iveiy
new to Mendota. Heights, but are no s�ra.n.gers ta the
beauty that Minnesota halds. '
C3ur property backs up to a� small pand.
Although the pond is almost impassible to see from
our house in the su�nme�e, we know thai it is th.ere
and respect it. The Iand directly adjacent to the pond
has not been touehed and will not be, as� we � realize its
value and respect the animals that ma�e it their hame. �
However, t�ie Iand e�ending up from this area
proved to be a hazardous enviranment for our .
children and vc�e have sought v�ry caref��l�y to amend
it. The band of woaded area that swrrounds our lawn
area was home to two unpleasant plants, the ��
buckthorn an.d the goaseberry. The thorns proved to
be more than t��ree small children could bear.
After careful con.sulta,tion with many of
Wentworth. Library's landscaping books, I purchased
a boa� published by the l��Iinnesota I�epa�:�tment af
Natural Resources called Landsca�ing for �iildlife.
�
r
♦
This boak was very helpful ta me. It gives ciear
descriptions how to �mprove a.landscape estheti+
and ai the same taime �and more �umparl:an.tly) retr
and enhan.ce its appeal to wildlife.
T�iis is what we have tried to achieve
yard. �asically, we co�tracted vv�ith Pace Lan.dsc
to remave buckthorn, gaoseberry, some sma1l (u
3/4 in.ch� scrub, and a bit af canstruction debris :
our rear yard. In its place we asked them to��plan,�
and shrubs that wouid be consistent �w�ith tb.e pla�
that can be faun.d elsewhere. in Mendota Heights
nat���al areas. This in.eludes sumac, qu�g aspe
and high. bush cranberry. These plants were chos
witli an eye an being consistent with what we
�
Additionally, a layer of waad chips has been l
to provide .sure footing for our childre� as they
e�plore the wooded area. Also,° a free-stan.ding tr
house�has been erected in th.is wooded area. This
i
our
trees
t life
iree house is nat the ty►pical play struct��re �hat h a
plastic slide or a br�ght canvas "tent". It is cedar '
canstruction and blends very. harmaniously with t e
environment.
� Directly adjacent to our house, we have
installed a cobblestane-Iaak paver patio. It is we
sit��ated atop the stone retaining wall (with railro
stairs).
Respectfu.11� submi�tted,
� s w l . A �
�
tie
� Q'%l /t"~-
6
�-'t
" . � 1t�T O� L� `
1��i+�ndata Hei�hts
� ' APPLYCATION FOR CONSII7ERATION
OF
PLANNING REQUEST .
.r_...
.1
_�.
,.
, <,,<��^�'�
�. • • t i .� i i �il�iil��l
♦,r
' � �, �!i .ie � � �
APPlicantName: ��'���,�. ���! j� G�+ PH: LI �.�"' �L�� oZ. .
(Last) (F'ust) (M�
Addr�ess: ��i iD"� �LS7'�t'� �.ii'+�� ���,�, r�ief'i�rA. E�� l�� ����
{Number & Streex} t�Y} ts�) t�P) .
Owner Namo• �� GZ�.%'� , �O,$Q�/jj �• C{.�hC� �/ 11 / � �. � ,
�� (F'�) tr'�
Aaa�• ���� ..�sr� . Ctrc,�E �'��� 1'h�rsx�v�a, 1��., K�l�! �'�12C�
{Num%ear & Str�t} t�hr) ts�e) t�P)
Stre�t I.ocatiaa of Fi+oge�ty in Qucstion: �� �o� �dh0� �t/D� �Q.S7M
i'%�dah:. 6�s; , i�r!✓ ��/2.t�
u� �ptio� �p,�.�: Lc�fi 1 �., 1� I a �k �-I , .���sh�v-�e �s���S
T�►pe of Requesc:
Rezoning
�Conditionai Use Peanit
Co�nditianal Usc Pemnit for P.U.D.
Plan Ap�rovai �
CAmpr�heasive Plan Am.cndment
Variance
Subdivisi� Approval
.x . x Wctlands P�tmit
t?thor (attach explamation)
ApPlicable City 4rdinaz�cc Numbcr ��� Section t�
Present Zoning of Prop�rc� r� Preseaait Use • r^�S .
Propased Zoning of Praperty .; """ Pmposed Use """'
I hereby dedaxc that alt staxments mada in this raNcst and on the�additionat �
mat�ri�i a� frtt� .. � . /�5��l�v�" C��Lr2z��'t,,` .
�
" (Si� � Applic�v;tj .
t���a� 1,�lqR',3�'
�,�,+� r
• \�+aw�
` <MVtti�J�.tJ'*r►.�+�.. Jt�"�• /�5�.
(R�OC1Y� �- �1�1. � ' .
1101 Victoria Crurve =1Vier�dota� Heigiit;�,��1ViN - 551�8 452•1854
� �-
•
1
.,,. ,� . . � 1��iendo�a Hei
.... . -- --- -
SIGNATIIRES OF CONSENT FOR VAItIANCB REOIIisST
TO:- The Planning Commission, City af Mendota Heights
FROM: Property Owners of �46�}-- �0�1� �,IP-t-� � _
RE:
We the nder,signed have reviewed the plans for
� 1r�,��;��;�� - : and understand the �erms
conditions c�reguested variance for UJ
We have no ob�ect ons to s request and do hereby
written aansent and consent to waiver of public hea
Sincerely, �
�
�
ve a �
,g.
NAME (Please Printj SIGNAZ'URE ADDRESS
irorl.:� /_�'1 ? 1�Sr�/JC.r»a�e,�" i�i'Ut��.. ��o�
„� �'
)a,� j ��.Y N�,+,��► - a�
.. � . . .
. �
. � :
11Q1 �ictoria Cwrve •.�.endota Height,s, �Vf►:N � 55f18
�
�
185Q _
m
0
1
r
. �
�
�`i"� P�Y�-N -- �.'� 6'�fi PcMd C�,r'c.�-� �s�' �
1'�'�n�tz. 1-�P:inh�''S , wfN�� �����i^,
�
�
��
�
�' "�1�!
.. �� �
(� �Jr�o�.i h �� - � ..
. � .
�(A�'UR�4L �1��'Efil�i ��n1
/ .. _ — �-- S S - -
� * �'4 ct Q c. '
V V .
v �, .n�r�oo • L
y� ���, � � t� L
• v ,M s .S s ��y�. . � � t''
v ;�• •� .•
. y
. ,�
i � `'
. , � SOD
�S• ,
s.,,!��_ � � �T�M �PS
•
• '
a
� i
t
, ` �TO �?'1 �S �i'�e�1 O [,�5�
Tom's Treehouse with optionai Sundeck,
Cargo Net, Picnic Table, and 10' Wave Stide
DIMENSIONS 12'x16"x10' 6' high
0
�
-���
, �� `�
A 7"reehouse Without a Tree
A longtime favorite, Tom's Treehouse has
thrilled families from coast to coast! •� Combine all the
features of Fort Adventure, but with a wooden roof.
The wooden roof provides a more subtle appearance,
blending with decks, fencing, trees and landscaping.
Our sets are designed to enhance the appearance of
your yard. No environmentally unpleasant color
combinations are used.
Tom's Treehouse is constructed of redwood
and westem �ed. cedar. All boards are carefully
sanded� stained, and sealed. No potentially toxic
"pressure treated" lumber is used.
Select from the many options to create your
own special Tom's Treehouse.
s
�
August 17, 1995
C i �y o� "� ��
1Viendota Hei hts
Ms. Billie Slater - -
2464 Pond Circle East
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Dear Mr. Slater:
Your application for Wetlands Permit will be considered by the Planning C
at their next regularly scheduted meeting, which will be held on Tuesdav, /
1995. The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. he
Hali in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on att
meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission co�sider�
If yau have a�y questions, please feet free to contact me.
Sincerely,
� �� `�`-:
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
Enclosures
�
1101 Victoria Curve •1Viendota Heights,lVj
,
are C'rty
dinct the
�
- 55118 " 45�•1850
� ; i�y o�r i
� l, j ,, � 1��enda�a Hei�hts
August 1 Q, 1995
Ms. Bitie Slater
2464 Pond Circle East
Mendata Heights, tVIN 5512t}
Qear Ms. Stater:
The #etter is to i�farm you that we have rece�ved your application for a Wetlands
�erm%�, Your application is considered complete a�d wili be forwarded to the
Planning Commission for their mee#ing on�►ug��R '[ 995.
The Planning Commission is an advisory body that conducts pubtic hearings and
reviews applications for recommendation to the City Council. The Planning
. Commission reserves the right ta request additionai, or suppiemental, information.
5tate Statute allows the Ptan�ing Commission to request an� additiona! six�ty (64}
days for review of any zoning matter. . �
The Ptanning Gommission meeting starts at �:30 o'clack P.M. here at City Hal���in
tfie Counci! Chambers. You, or a representative, wiil need #o be present in order
that your applicatian may receive Commissian cansideration.
If you have any questions, piease feei free to contact me at 452-1850.
5i�cerely.
j�,,,� �,�:��.
Kevin Baxchelder
Admm�strative Assistant
KCB:kkb
1101 VictQria Curve -1Viendota. Heiglitis, �N • 55118 452•1850 _
September 1, 1995
To: Mendota. Heights City Council
From: Joseph and Billie Slater
2464 Pond Circle F.ast
Mendota. Heights, MN 55120
Dear Council Members,
We are writing this letter to inform you of the situation affecting our applicatio for
a Wetlands Pernut. Earlier in the summer we removed some bushes from our backyar �
that were causing problems for us. We contracted with Pace Landscaping to remove
buckthom and gooseberry bushes from our backyard. They also removed some small ( ess
than 3/4 inch in diameter) scrub and a diseased honeysuckle from the area. surroundin
our lawn area. �
As indicated in the Minnesota. Deparlment of Natural Resources' book Landsca ing
for Wildlife,
the plants that were removed either pose significant disease and insect problems
(gooseberries) or have undesirable landscape or wildlife qualities
(honeysuckles and buckthorn).
This vegetation was removed only after careful consideration. However, having
lived in Mendota. Heights for less than a year, at that point, we were unaware that an
ordinance exists governing the removal of said vegetation within a protected wetlands ea.
If we had known that a pernut was required, we would have applied for it.
We were in no way trying to "get awa.y" with anything and did not try to hide w t
we were doing. In fact, we discussed our plans with both our next door neighbors and
asked for their feedback well before this project began. �
We apologize for not having sought a Wetlands Pernut before work began. This
an unintentional error on our part.
After removal of the undergrowth, .more than 29 trees remain untouched within 1 0
feet of the pond's edge. In this azea. we have replaced undesirable vegetation with Suma
Viburnum,Quaking Aspen, River Birch, Pin Oak, Lilac, and some small evergreens. This ,
demonstrates our desire to keep this as a natural azea and to provide habitat to native
wildlife.
Within the wooded area, we have also placed a treehouse in which our three chil en
enjoy playing. No trees were removed in order to place it there. It is not unlike the dozen or
more play structures that ma.y be found in the backyards of other families living on pon
in our neighborhood. It is consistent with others found in our area. The Planning
Commission suggested tha.t we move the treehouse to a different location outside 100' f
from the pond. We have considered this and ha.ve determined that there is no other
appropriate location in our backyard. The remaining portion of our backyard is either
patio, walkway, or is forested. The current location is the only appropriate one.
At the Planning Comtnission meeting, an error was made. Chairman Mike Dwyer
misrepresented the intent of Ordinance #402. He stated that the intent of the ordinance is
insure that a 100ft. band around the pond is kept in "pristine", natural condition. This is
clearly not the case. Three of my neighbors have house setbacks of 90', 85', and 75' (245 ,
2449, and 2455 Pond Circle East respectively). This is not the location of a treehouse or
deck, but rather their entire houses! Each of these three neighbors have then been gran
permits to extend decks even farther into the wetlands area. The first by 15 additional feet,
the next be 11.5 additional feet, and the third by 13 additional feet.
The squaze footage of even half of one of these approved decks far outnumbers that
of our children's treehouse. It has a setback of 71 feet and is approxima.tely 37 square feet
in area.
Sta.ff has informed us that some of the houses in Brentwood have setbacks as close
as 45 feet from the pond. Also, as is the case with our backyazd, the sod that is located in
the backyards of these houses was not original to these pieces of land, and Centex is the
entity that crea.ted the open, sodded areas found in most of the backyards. These lots were
not in their "pristine", natural condition when we got them.
There is a scenic easement around the Copperfield ponds. It is intended to maintain
"pristine" conditions around the edges of the ponds. 'That area has not been touched.
Regarding the ordinance itself, we would like to look at the Standards Pursuant to
the Issuance of the Wetlands Pernut, as specified in Section 7, of Ordinance 402:
A.1. No dredging done.
A.2. No dredging done. „
A.3. No dredging done.
A.4. No dredging done. -
A.S. Earthwork not done during breeding season of water fowl or the fish spawning
season.
A.6. No boat channel involved.
y�.
A.7. No septic or sewage work done.
A.8. Run-off rate not affected.
A.9. No waste discharged.
A.10. No disposal of refuse.
A.11. No floor elevations.
A.12. No endangerment to health, safety, or welfare. •
A.13. Vegetation removal done with least possible negative impact on azea.
A.14. Vegetation removal was reasonably required for use of the property.
A.15. Storm water run-off not affected.
A.16. No increase in run-off.
A.17. Quality of water unchanged.
A.18. Land developed in accordance. �
A.19. Soil loss is less than five tons per acre per
A.20. Wetlands not used as sediment trap.
A.21. Sediment yield does not exceed two tons.
A.22. Solid loss from the site will not be greater than 0.5 tons per acre.
A.23. None of the existing crown cover was removed.
We feel that what we have done has had a minimal impact on the Wetlands Area.
We extend to you an invitation to come and see it for yourselves.
Using these standards developed by the City of Mendota Heights, we ask that you
grant us a Wetland Pernut.
Sincerely,
Joseph F. Slater
�
Billie C.S. Slater
.
�i��f��� �• J�
,
s s � . � � ` ,. i �
.
1 • j � � � ' •
We, the undersigned, are neighbors of the �
Family. We have na reservations about the
iocation of or construction of a treehouse in
backyard. It �s surrounded by large �rees. W
no� fiind it offensive in any way.
�..�.��=�
/���,�-'.�i�-�
���� �-~t �-'�
�
_ h
Sincerely,
_ �
( t
�later
�
L
submitted on September 5,199�
�
September 1, 1995
Ms. Billie Slater
2464 Pond Circle East
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Dear Ms. Simmonds:
. C ity o�
1Viendota Heights
Your request for a Wetlands Permit will be considered by the City Council at their
next regulariy scheduled meeting, which wili be held on Tuesday. September 5. 1995.
The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council
Chambers. You, or a�representative should plan on attending the meeting in order
that your application will receive Council consideration If you have any questions,
please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kimberlee K. Blaeser -
Senior Secretary
�
�
z
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights,lViN �• 55118 -.. 452 • 1850
} .. . . .. _ . _ . �� -
TO:
FROM:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 31, 1995
Mayor, City Council and City Adminis rat
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist t�
SUBJECT: Case No. 95-23: Simmonds - Conditional Use Permi.t for Filf
DISCUSSION
Ms. Janice Simmonds, of 1324 Sylvandale Road, appeared at a pu�
hearing held during the August Planning Commission meeting to request �
Conditional Use Permit for Fill in order to develop a single family home on�
A, Evergreen Knolls. Ms. Simmonds is estimating approximately 900 cub.
of fill will be needed to raise the home so it may have gravity flow to san
sewer utilities on Wachtler Avenue. The filling of over 400 cubic yards r
Conditional Use Permit .(Please see attached Planner's Report and Appli
There were several neighbors at the public hearing who stated th�
not in opposition to the project but addressed. concerns about perimeter
erosion control, drainage within the easements,..the future extension of '
Avenue and truck access to the area.
Ms. Simmonds has submitted an erosion control plan and is propo
add thirty five spruce trees to the perimeter of the property. Easements
drainage and utilities were requested as a condition of approval. Anothe
proposed condition of approval is that truck access to the site be along \
Avenue and not use Evergreen Knolls.
�lic
Outlot
c yards
tary
quires a
:ation).
were
ees,
achtler
ng to
�achtler
� f
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to close the public hearing. The
Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend that City Council grant a
Conditional Use Permit for Fill with the following conditions:
1. That turf establishment specifications be added to the Final Plan.
2. That an additional silt fence be included along the eastern property
line across the swale to golf course.
3. That the driveway turnaround be reviewed by the Fire Marshal and
include a five foot (5') setback to the property line.
4. That all dump truck spillage be cleaned promptly at the cost of the
developer.
5. That ten foot (10') utility easements around the property perimeter be
provided to the City.
6. That all dump truck access to the site be from Wachtler Avenue and
not Evergreen Knolls.
ACTION REQUIRED
Meet with the applicant. If the City Council desires to implement the �
Planning Commission recommendation, they should pass a motion to adopt
Resolution No. 95- , A RESOLUT/ON APPROV/NG A COND/T/ONAL USE
PERMIT FOR F/LL TO ALLOW CONSTRUCT/ON OF A S/NGLE FAM/L Y HOME AT
OUTLOT A, EVERGREEI�I KNOLLS. .
KLB:kkb
:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING FILL TO
BE PLACED ON OUTLOT A, EVERGREEN KNOLLS (PLANNING CASE N. 95-23)
WHEREAS, Ms. Janice Simmonds has made application for a Cond tional
Use Permit for Fill to place approximately 900 cubic yards of fill on Outlo A,
Evergreen Knolls Addition in order to construct a new single family home at an
elevation high enough to be served by City sanitary sewer located at the
intersection of Evergreen Knoll and Wachtler Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission conducted public
hearing on August 22, 1995 to consider said application; and
WHEREAS, based upon the public record transcribed at said public hearings,
the Mendota Heights Planning Commission voted (5-0) to recommend to he
Mendota Heights City Council that the above described Conditional Use ermit for
Fill be approved subject to the following conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
That turf establishment specifications be added to the Final
That an additional silt fence be included along the eastern
line across the swale to golf course.
That the driveway turnaround be reviewed by the Fire
include a five foot (5') setback to the property line.
That all dump truck spillage be cleaned promptly at the
developer.
That ten foot (10') utility easements around the property
provided to the City.
That all dump truck access to the site be from Wachtler A
not Evergreen Knolls.
WHEREAS, the City Council considered said application for Condi
Permit for Fill at their meeting on September 5, 1995.
�ian.
operty
�al and
of the
imeter be
nue and
�nal Use
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights that the proposed Conditional Use Permit for Fill will have no
adverse effect on the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the
community and the surrounding land and that said proposed 900 cubic yards of fill
is not adverse to the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights that said Conditional Use Permit for Fill be approved subject to the
following conditions:
1. That turf establishment specifications be added to the Final Plan.
2. That an additional silt fence be included along the eastern property
line across the swale to golf course.
3. That the driveway turnaround be reviewed by the Fire Marshal and
include a five foot (5') setback to the property line.
4. That all dump truck spillage be cleaned promptly at the cost of the
developer.
5. That ten foot (10') utility easements around the property perimeter be
, provided to the City.
6. That all dump truck access to the site be from Wachtler Avenue and
not Evergreen Knolls. .
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 5th day of
September, 1995. �
By
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
September 1, 1995
Ms. Janice Simmonds
1324 Syivandale Road
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Ms. Simmonds:
� C i y o�
1Viendota Hei � hts
Your request for a Conditional Use Permit for Fill will be considered
Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held
► the City
Tuesdav,
September 5. 1995. The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. h�re at City
Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on
meefing in order that your application will receive Council consideration
any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kimberlee K. Blaeser -�
Senior Secretary
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Vigndota Heights, 1ViN • 55118
the
` you have
e
• 1850
�
t':{)r�:tit.t:i I:ti�: I'I.i��:�[�::�
I_AV1:JS('i:!'I •?12(.'1!I?i•<'i�
itl{! 1'�lfi�'1 A\�EiVUt. :�t�tt'ift
StJI'T`L 2It} '
h11NNEAPC)I.IS. ,vlti ��Jlll
( 1? � 3 i9• i il1t1
PLA.NNING REPORT
T3ATE:
CASE NO;
APPLICANT:
LOCATION: _
ACTIQN REQUESTED:
PREPARED BY;
PLA]'�?1'�IIlYG C4rISID�RATION'S
Background,
August 22, I995
95-23
7anice Simrnons, 1324 Silvendale Road
I65Q Wachtler Avenue/Outlot A, Evergreen
Knolls F'ust Additian
Conditional LTse Pernut for Fill
C. John Uban
11ris, Jazuce Sunmons '� ta con:�.uct a single f�mily home oa fl►uttot A of Evergreen Knalls which
is located at the end of Wachtler Avenue in between Wachtler Avenue and the Par "Three Golf
Course. Wachtter Avenue is platted but nat consf�ucted along the west edge ofthe property. In
order to place the home at an elevation which can access the sanitary sewer without a pump lift
station, a grade change of approximately four feet is necessary. It has been est.iama#ed that
approximately 90p cubic yards of fill will be necessary to raise the building pad and surrounding yard
for the home.
The fitling of aver 4�0 cubic yards requires a Canditional Use Permit.
The applicant has submitte� a Site Plan shawing e7cisting trees ta be remaved, erosion cantrot, grades,
home placement, driveway, and location of new landscaping. Architectural elevations ofthe home
have also been provided. This is a wooded property as indicated on the Site Ptan and tr�es wi1l be
removed in the pmcess of grading. A Tree Perntit under the existing moratorium will be required and
addressed at City Councc�tt. It shautd be nated that the trees to be removed are relativety small szzed
poplar, elm and box elder, which are nat considered desired trees under the City's Landscape
Ordinance. The propased pIan indicates approximately 35 spruce and pine to be pianted on the site,
A public hearing natice has been pu6lished and miaited notices have been sent to the adjacent praperty
owners wit�un 350 feet. '
August 22, 1995 Case 95-23
Condiiional Use Permit
The project as designed places a single structure on an outlot that is about an acre in
originally intended to be two single family lots. Because the home is placed in the
property, further subdivision of the lot will not be possible. The proposed gading and f
to bring the home up to an elevation sufficient for gravity sanitary sewer connection.
Page 2
ze and was
nter of the
is required
Wachtler Avenue does not extend through this area and that portion of the right-of-way s proposed
to be left in its natural condition A driveway with turn-around will access the home an will allow
emergency equipment turn-around on the properiy. The eacact dimensions of the turn-ar und should
be reviewe�i by the fire marshall prior to issuance of a building pernut. Alsq the site sket is uncleax
on the exact setback of the driveway to the property line. A five foot setback is requir .
The giading on the site will primarily take place in the center unwooded area. �erimeter
be enhanced with additional landscaping. Also silt fencing will be installed around the;
to control erosion and run-off during conshvction �Zrf establishment should be part
building pernut for all graded areas. Additional erosion control protection may be req
eastern edge of the properly so that the drainage swale does not c;arry soil onto the golf G
can be added to the plan at the fime ofBuilding Permit Review.
In order to bring in 900 cubic yards of fill, approximately 90 truck loads of dirt will co�
site. The timing of this constcuction activity could be reviewed with the applicant as
requirements for cleaning up spilled debris along streets leading up to the site. These co�
be added to the permit.
Action.
Review applicant's request for fill and make a recommendation to the City Council.
Considerations.
1.
2.
3.
4.
,,
Turf establishment specifications to be added to the Final Plan.
Additional silt fence along eastern property line across swale to golf course.
1�rn-around reviewed by fire marshall including a five foot property line setback.
Dump truck spillage clean up.
is will
d area.
� final
at the
This
onto the
:ll as any
:ions can
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � �
Case No. 95-23 �- �
NORTH °� "°�
scu�: t•-zoo• 6��..�.�,�' 6601
5 �
A.ugust 31, 1995
Mr. Kevin Batchelder
Mr. Tim Danielson
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota �Ieighis, MN 55118
Re: 1650 Wachtler Avenue
Dear Genttemen:
T�us ietter is to c�u�ify my urtent to build a home at 165{} Wach�ler Avenue.
It is nece.ss��ry ta bring approximately 900 cubic yards af fill outo the site in order to
proposed hause elevations. The house elevations are necessary to avoid using a lift ,
tthe
Outlot A was originaliy plotted to accommodate two buildiag sites. One house will be b' t on
the lot with a tuin araund circle drive, serving the fram of the house, tbis circular drive s auld
adequately address accessibility for f re vehicles. �
The landscape plan calls for an addition of approximately 3S evergreen trees, and the
approx3mately eight trees Iarger than four inches in diatneter.
Sincerely,
C�Qii�uc
�
7anice Simmands
r,
61
of
.--.� 1 L� 1 L,1 L
�ity a� t` �
1��.e�n►dota Hei��►ts
- - APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
OF
PLANNIl�IG REQUEST
�
c� N�, `� � - a� :
Date of Applicatian ugus � ,
Fee Paid l d�
ApglicantName• Simmonds Janice V pH; 450-5426
. ,�
t�) (F'�) C�
�,��• 1324 Sylvandale Road Mendo�a Heights, MN 55118
� (Numtxr 8t street) tt:ity) (scaze) Czip)
,; .
OwnerName. Simmonds .7anice V
(Last} (��irst} (M�
A��• I324 Sylvandale Rosd Meadoea Heights, MN 55118
w tNumber & Stceex) (t�ty} � tstate} (Tap}
Smeet I.acation of Pmperty ia Question:' 16 5 Q Wacht 1 er Avenue
I,,����,�ptiQ�4�p��ny; Out lot A Ever�ree� Rnolls
First.Additian '� `
� - 4 ` " i - v
':✓ • r r �
Condinonal Use F'emxit
Conditional Use Penmii forP.U.D.
Pian Approval
Compnehcnsive 1'lan Amendme�tt
'v1llc�riCe
$tlbdiYi5i41t App2�DVc�
- Wetlands �tnnit
Other (attach explanation)
Applicable City C3rdinaace Numbcr �b � Sxdon �. t'4-
P�esent.7.oaingofP'x�rEy ' � F�tUse � 'S � � C�¢. '�+�..•�•�•c% �+ow�2
�7 . T
Proposed Zaning of Propesty .;�'�� Ptx�posed Us� '� ••� t2 �w. ���r �^.� w�.Q
� Z
I hereby dedarc that ali s�ta�emc�tts madc in tl�is. request and an the �ddid
materi� arte tcue ., • .
(sigaaa�re � A 1ic�nat} .
. � -1
�}
.Y'�=.���-- -
(R+�ivet�by-Zictey � -- .
1101 Victvria Curve �•N�endata�Heig�its; �i�iN •��55118�.��' �� 452-185U -' = � �
y<
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
NOTICE OF HEARING
August 8 , '! 995
TQ WHONI !T MAY CQNGERN:
NOTlCE is hereby given ihat the Pianning Commission o# Mendota H�
meet at 9:15 o"clock P.M., or as soon as possible thereafter, on TueSday, A
1995, in the City Nali Councit Chambe�s, 1'1 Q'1 Victoria Curve, ��Viendat<
Minnesota, to consider an application from Ms. Janice Simmonds far a C
Use Permit for Fit[ which wouid allow approximateiy 900 cubic yards af
would allow the construction of a single family hause anto the following
property:
Out�ot A, Evergreen K�otls
More particuiarly, �t%is properiy is located at 1650 Wachtier A�
ghts will
gust 22,
Heights,
nditional
it[ which
escribed
This notice is pursuant ta City of Mendota Heights Zoning Qrdinance No.. 401.
Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the request for a C� nditional
Use Permit wilt be heard at this meeting.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Cierk
Auxi/iary aids for disabled persons are availab/e upon request at-�
hours in advance. /f a notice of /ess than 120 hours is received, tl
lirlendota Heights wil/ make every attempt to provide fhe aids, how
may not be passi�i/e on short notice. P/ease contact City Administratc
�85(1.
3sr r2o
City of
re�', this
at 452-
w
� 1�� O� r.
,.,., ,� � 1��enda�a Hei�h�s
August 3 7r 1995
Ms. Janice Simmonds
9 324 Syivandate Road
Mendota Heights, MN 5511$
Oear Mr. Simmonds:
Your application tor Gonditional Use Permit for Fill wi11 be cansid�red by the Pianning
Commission at #fieir nexfi �regulariy scheduted meeting, which wilt be hetd on i'uesdav.
pugust 22, 99�5. The Ptanning Cammission meedng starts at 7:30 o'ctock P.M. here
are City Natl in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative shouid ptan on
attending the meeting, in arder that your apptication witl receive Commission
consideration.
if you have any ques�tions, piease feei free ta contact me.
ti
�� � l t
,� � 1 { � . � % .
r' �
Kimberlee K. Blaes�r
Senior Secretary
Enclosures
�
1101 Vietvria Curve •1i�fi.endota Heig�its,lViN - 55118 452•1850
, «. s ,r
,� �
�
��
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 30, 1995
Mayor, City Council and City Administ t
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assista�
SUBJECT: Case .No. 95-24: Nelson - Fence Height Variance
DISCUSSION
Mr. Dan Nelson, 575 Sibley Court, appeared before the August PI
Commission meeting to request a fence height variance allowing his five
high patio fence to remain. Mr. Nelson lives on a corner lot and his side
treated as a front yard, thereby requiring a thiriy foot (30') setback. Fen
be thirty six inches (36") or less if they are within this required front yarc
see attached Planner's Report and Application). '
Signatures of Consent have been ob�ained from the neighbors and
Planning Commission had no other concerns relative to his request.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the
requested fence height variance.
ACTION REQUIRED
Meet with the applicant. If Council desires to implement the, Plan
Commission's recommendation, a motion should be passed approving a
four inch (24") fence height variance to allow a five foot (5') high fence
as constructed, at 575 Sibley Court along Warrior Drive.
KLB:kkb
�t (5')
rd is
5 must
(Please
�enty-
remain
r.� n�:n•,... .
CONtiI.!!:; 1P;:; 1'U�N!vLl:�
1_Atil')S<'hi'P AR(:II!i-I�C"i ti
.iQ(1 FlRS i :\VE,\UL• !�c)f:l if
SUITF ?Ic)
MII`UL•AI'OL1S. n•iN �::.1117
(�12•'�.id• i ill(i
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:
CASE NO:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PREPARED BY:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
Background.
August 22, 1995
95-24
Daniel Nelson
575 Sibley Court, Lot 10 Block 1, Sibley
Heights
Fence Height Variance
C. 7ohn Uban
Mr. Dan Nelson of 575 S�bley Court was contacted by a Mendota. Heights Code Enforcement Officer
following the e�tion of a patio fence. Mr. Nelson has constructed a five foot cedar fence along two
edges of his patio for a total length of approximately 30 feet. Because his home is on the corner lot
of Sibley Court and Warrior Drive, the fencing along the patio which faces Warrior Drive must meei
the frotrt yard setback of 30 feet or be 36 inches or less in height. The fence as consh�ucted with the
five foot height in this area requires a variance.
The home sits across from the play fields of Henry Sibley I�igh School. The exposure of this rear
yard to play activity and Warrior Road has�irivaded to some degree, the privacy of his rear yard. The
construction of this patio with 30 feet of fencing and associated landscaping was primarily done to
develop some separa.tion from the street for enjoyment of his rear yard.
Mr. Nelson has received signatures of consent from all of his immediate neighbors and the Planning
Commission may waive the requirement for a public hearing.
Fence Height Variance.
The proposed fence has been partially constructed and can be viewed in the side yard of the home.
Most of the rear yard will not be encumbered by a fence and only 30 feet will be constructed to add
Augusi 22, 1995 Case 95-24 � Page 2
some privacy to the new patio. Landscaping and ra.ised planters are also used to help cr
for the rear yard and the lcitchen bay window. Because of the corner lot situation, Mr,
a practical difficulty in creating privacy in his rear yard. This is exacerbated by being acro
form the Henry Sibley athletic fields. The fencing consumes only about one fifth of the si�
so there is not the extensive wall effect that can be created in s'imilar conditions along a
Landscaping has been placed around the fencing as well to soften the public exposure.
The fencing design is five inch boards spaced approximately 2�/z inches allowing approx
pexcent open space which is required in the ordinance for fencing. The two foot height
approximately 30 feet of fencing will assist Mr. Nelson in creating a certairi degree of pt
rear yard. The closest the fence comes to the right-of-way is 22 feet allowing f
landscaped yard between the fence and street right-of-way.
Action.
Review applicant's requests and make a recommendation to the City Council.
;ate privacy
Nelson has
�s the street
le yard area
�ublic road.
ately a 30
riance for
.cy for his
an ample
�
CITY QF MENDQTA HEIGHTS � "��
. . ��
Ca.�e �To. �5--24 � �
NORTH �q, "� "°""
scata: r-2aa� ,';�`•, a auo,
�
August &, 1995
City of Mendota. Heights
1101 Victaria C�uve
Mendota. Hts., MN 55118
Planning Commission:
We are requesting permission to obtain a variance for privacy fences.
The property at 575 Si�ley Court, is a corner lot with two sides facing public streets. '
direc�ly across from Sibley H'igh School ball fields that entertain a large number of pe
during scasonal sports/activitics, thus cxposing tha privatc ateas of thc lawn. As this i
home, it la�cks mature trees wlrich coninbute to the lack of priva�cy. By building these
would be fulfilling a great need for privacy and enhaacing the landscape. These fence
total of 181inear feet and do not obshvct any of our neighbor's views.
►e are
ple
a ncw
�nces, we
are a '
To provide adequate privacy, a fence height of five feet is required. This does not mee� the ,.
cunent ciiy ordinance, and therefore a variance is required
We hope after r�viewing the desiga and location of these fences, you will conclude tha
necessary for preservation of privacy with enhancement :of the existing landscape. We
appreciate your consideration of this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
�����Q�� �e.��n,
� �
Daniel and Ann Marie Nelson
they are
.--.
v�
Agplicant Name: ' (�
�
Address: �� r �.�
, C ity o� i: ,
1��eri,data Heigh�s
APFLICATION FOR CONSIDERA.TIQN
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
. ��'?--'-� � r
► . . • � � . � . � �.i�l�'.��'i
` � ,i. j�; i
(First} (MIj
(Number & St�et) (CitY) (State) (ZiP)
4wner Name: 1�`'. i`�'�j� �,�, ,'�,�1 I C',� i�
{I,asc} j�nrs,t) tMI}
• . � :,�
(Number 8� Str�et) (Cxts'j (S1�te) C�P)
�•
Street Location of Froperty in. Question: 5�� S� �71 �V Gf• .
r., ,��.� . .► 1 1 1.R ,i fr
� �f' � � � � � �
Type of Rcquest:
Re�zouing
Ctanditional Use Peimit
Ct►uditional Usc Pemnit for P.0 D,
Plan Approval
Compreheasive Plan Amendm�nt
�%�
y ValtaD.CC
' � Subdivision Approval
• � Wetlands Pemut
Oth�er (attach eaplanaticin)
Applicab2e City iJrciinancc Numbcr Section �F�lc�S q'� „ 1.2�A.
Preser;t Zo�in,gaf�ProgcrE� ���t Use, �t��1 t��tQ� � '
Pmposed Zoning of Pr�perty : Proposed Use Cl {? i,t,C1Q P,
I hereby dedarc ihat all sta�eme�ts m�adc in this request an the additianal
materiat a� hue. . .
(Si�at� af APPli t} .
Q.s,fi,�" t9X, i��! � M
�� r
;£�� .
.:::,: - .
. (Received by - Title)'- � • '
11ii1 � Victoria �Curve • 1VS.endota��Heights,;�VS.N� � 55118 -��- s-452• 1854
:,
TO:
FROM:
�i �r a�'
.�i�endata I�eights
1
SIGNATQRES QF CC?NSENT FQR VARIANCT REOUEST
The Planning Commission, City of Mendota Heights
Propert� Uwners of �7� �� b 1e� �, c,c,✓f
�: �cc. - i��.��,�T
1 A��! G�.
1�1�.2.to t�K`,..
.�
We �he undersigned have reviewed the plans for
: and understand the.terms
conditZans of the requested varianae for
we have rzo on3 ections to r.nis reques� ana aa ue
written consent and consent to waiver of public
Sincerely, �
NfAME (Please Print� SIGNATURE
..
_ ,,,,�'G�;�,�..__.�
'7�.o►�,a4 � ��,�-o� _`1"h.t.eman
.
f!'►��c�4-+�c.�,,,.1►��arzY't3�.�r�-- sz. �ir��er�� � _._„
/�1'1���- � ��r�nie- ��1n1 �--�.�
�-tr�vt,� L�itJ1+J �. (� �G5 �4 ir�„ ,�",�,�
�
�?�u-�'� f4+�tnl S�r,�t� -
�.�:Y,f� I f��� ti� � . . .
Cpes t�c.�tJ���;ace� n�e�r-2� .
�j � . �,�,
� � k9� �► � �. �i�1��'�C/w__._
�t�� Y � San Vu�(�U�� � .
r . .
:aa.�aay • I
ADDRESS
_ ..
i
I{INCL. TAT}
Sibl+
�; b
,SBZ ��t� ��
G
.�7 � <�
� �� S.' 1.�.
1101 i�ictoria Curve •1't�'.endota. Heights,lVi`N •�55118
�
�
�
�....---�.........+..�� _. «,. ... .. «.. .�.. _ ....... .. ........ -.
�
:�
�
�.rriG�' � n t��,
___
_y-'_._-- �... .1�O,f! � �r I''�zI^te• �'l� K�; � 111ary �ar�fl�
iorr� + �-yrn �a�c'��'r � �n �-: t�,�`i���
�USheG ��'r�`�c �e .� ?:5 �-�= S 7�/
, - �.:� � -� -- �- ��
S7� ' tf
�. .' ?OIYI � �'tu.1"�� ; �..r
r;.c� , ,..__.____. �._..__ - ---� � --- � � . ��' i1 � t� �C'r.ftl il� �
� .�
' �ill { Unr� ! TI1ipYl�ot� � � uroWrl :
��� 5utmar� ' � �r � -�- �"8� `
$� ; . . ....; .___. :
.. � .. . ... .. .. _ i iorr � J c,►Gn i .
,� : �
c> . ; tlu�tt,�ilir., �
""t—' ' . i
_..__.., i ----------------_. .
j .... . . ' � .
I" , t.
!
/ ', ��
t �
� f .
/ '
_ 1 -� /
i J
i �
I ' • '
• � .�...' «�..._.._. ....... . ......�._.__...... ._- ..., ...•i. ..�.`........___-..... _.. ...«.»__.�_...»�.� ..
e � �
September 1, 1995
Mr. Dan Nelson
575 Sibley Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Nelson:
C lt O�
1Vier�dota Hei hts
Your request for a Fence Height Variance will be considered by the City
their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, Se�,
1995. The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City
Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the
order that your application will receive Council consideration If yo�
questions, please feel free to contact me.
,
Sincerely,
'K�.Y�1 �{
Kimberlee K. Blaeser -
Senior Secretary
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118
�uncil at
mber 5.
I in the
etin4 in
�have any
�
• 1850
m
� i�y O� �.
,,. ,� j � 1��ienda�a Hei�hts
August 17, 1995
Mr. Daniet Nelson . _ -
575 Sibley Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Nelson:
Your appiicatian for Variance will be considered by the Planning Gommissian at their
�ext regulariy scheduted meeting, which wilt �be hetd on Tuesday, August 22, 1995.
The Planning Commission meeti�g sqrts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here are City Hall in the
Councii Chambers. You, or a represe�tative shoutd p[an on attending the meeti�g,
in order that your application wiil receive Commission considerafion.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
$incerely,
. �C���..� Lu��!� �
�f ��
Kevin Batchelder
Adm'rnistrative Assistant � ' �
KLB:kkb
Enctosures
.
e
�
1101 Victoria Curve =1V�i.endota Heights, �UiN - 55118 452-1$54
, . ,
PVF MID►VVEST INC.
Industr�al Pipe. Valves and F�ttings
RP OJECT NAME: ������ �7SY �� �1�``� ���-�r DATE;
: ": " " " 1�;�. ..�"�*` .'�w' � � r . . ` �* _ Hw. ^ • ` �i .
� �,�� yi.4 i' �,` �' ^ , � , r � , ♦ ' 4.
� 1 , ' 't�,''�*: �A�-� 1� �� �Y �///y� i �j /� C •i, h ��
is \. � S Z_ `-�, � ir �,��,,,s .�'G.C:� J�C-f� rt{Y}
�.+� { < _ �. «y ..--r ..+t.- .
�'"� }� ' � �``�� , �•� - `�t` ` j;✓ � � -
._..�X`. . „ ' _.�� ��'»�,s' .�" . . . _ ' wl. yr�'_ ;x,..
'�'K.' � i� ` . . ' �, � � .� �/�
�� . _ . t t ` . . �..,.� � . / . ,..
J�'+*..--�. --- _t �.a,. . x.. w�--i-- •'�.` - i,,.7. , � . ;�� '���`.*���������� ` .�+
� .� � ` �t, �� `• � . � ' � `� ~}4• ' ' :
ars.`.�, ', "...t___ 'r...j„�;�,.�... �..a :>� _- . :,,�c;�..: :�t..--. . ; .
; ;� ' �' ,y " � i , ' �r� . .
�., .;r''" , �r�� ::.y�..�. .. � . ,�, _ !
v�. ��h {� ,1r i �i
V� " J . i 1�:. ��,� � ..d�� . � {� _ , M1 . „ .
r�, � � .� ��.. t � . , �,> .
` .;.. . _-i_-, �`� .-.....r� y1- . p T..
,?��a�,�,..J,E:CT �O�'1 j � (r(,%_.� ��^�-.^:+v`�.7,;T; r�•���`^,i�tYt, ci�i7'1 e..r;S,..��+G �}li... i'/1`S �i�: 'r
r ,� ,..
�# C. X j��2 c�` To hf� �-2,�, .�C.�. y�m 9�.vS J�,.C�d �, ,�^8, . 0�1.: �b Tl�.er�n'.'� J'Uir+*•rr ,� z. p�. ��! C-
� `�;p'iC .I.' �0 - �i�t7''t'�� �'_��.i7;2vG�','_„lYi.�f ��{Q?C�i..� '.,�% �C,� �"i `'�..^v'? @� '" _t�/�`w,_'Sn �+_Q�T
�: � �} 'd:i: . 9'""';� f� `r.�''`;-" '" a., 1 { , t �'f � -.�".t..'..' .„ t .�
�. �< < -�._
+� � �n`t`?�nLi,r2(K' ��l'�Y P.� r���PSi �}1h �};�(„l.4ri `� �2,/".�„��1�-`�"• O; `, ����,{,w"iW.��+: ��f2.�
y.r.� .. y.-. -. ,� v'! �� . y _>;4 �Qs, fa�a..-r . ; .; y ,^, 4«�Jrr
".��'�''_ �iso : SCr_t-�?e.^.5.. ✓ w n.tr oZ;; ,�.�?�(a, -/�'n � S'''f � ��' y•r i'�`� r`r, _ �`"G:Nt�`v �.,.� �1 k
��,, "y � ' `��,y-��,' " '. .. ..�"^. Y j _;.•r1 � �+'�'c.y. t... � �:.Sr:, r`{` � ., i :%%`�
�i;' ~'_;0�2��'.�m2: ���-.S. � c�-Q- ���}'?�-.s :�.(�+� ,xA� � corz.�l,2�i` �c�� � i,.•.'7�rf;,,,, l�.00�
"T' . a'�. , ; „� 4.- , �.S---r+,J4,- r---", . �,,�r,_._ .ti^-f_ y.�.._ j_ � tr r�.
`�.,:�;,3,q-�� ,C�rr,.e 1g ,�ir�%�,2..�',,.����- , f�c�ots,.�.,�"�'2,.,`.�_:.��r?.-� �,. �'e-�c�e.r �h'e �r'
�' _D�acOu.tA6"�.'.. ,::�"�l:.�:'!+`�� 1�''�norr;, ��1jv�1�l:,� �i^/� ���!"+��j \�• "�h�►'� !#':i�'/�j��"'�G'�-
t ,.�: .-^r � ,r' C ":�^" ,, i :- ,� •a"� a ` i' ;":i , I-'-
y�4 n���p� �� �.�.��"� `w' •,. r� }�
± � 4�.�j/4S �77�'���,. : �i�.t �t���1 '� VLF'� f"'_; wYG�%�+' `�ir7:"1 - 'v.,,.ec,!'.F�7�li"_ �".C?iC � F" t .t
f.. " `.�.=�. � �, ; ... ,.:,__ �
�� � r .r� � ,,,.�r `�,� {� : � �-�,. U .� »
�' SLc��;���` C,��.'�^p�(Yn=ie.,T �.`1'�t���.ec����-.__O:r.. y�,9�'ia�+..J� �+rv , ;: � '
.�..� 1 _ • � .,�, ��r,•�J ,;,,.r�;-.. µr�!-.. Y:r'� .� r'"���~' i. �..�.` ..�r '",,,�.r
:->„ .c..}.^. _ � ,,:.:",�:�. ����'^�1i �•,,"S' ��.k: � M,; � ',,,r� `` y�.',i''��� • � Y� ` .
' �r� �' � f �..
a-7s�-4342
c # �s�-�sss
��� �
� ry n
— - ., " . - r�++-^-t �,1�...�_, _ _..,,:�.. , . �...,,+.. ... .f " ..i...._ . F. . :r.. ...y,3..i w aYtir..K .. . . .. +t :. , . , . u. .
� ... .., i. ``y,.^'� �''^..�' �"'Y.�. c+,- ' ""^ �i r"�`,� � � � ' .�^ « '
,r ti �..� ,•,� K - ° •� `�` ^• „� 'k Y E � : ' . . , .
� J�r ._ , _ .._.,�- }J.. ..� :.,...t. ....t. �.�„c�; . ]y� + ... .0 . ,.' -. �{�:'`,.f..' _�.__ i. -;., ` y�;. .
i { . 'l'�...., f a
�.. ' y_3 �,�'rX �in'�8.� 7€�ip�-ct� ,.= � .�: ,s'' ,.;:. s' :�- ; .r ��,, .
.,p" - {. , , 1 '�,' �"..-� : -r-.': _ - f+,� ..,-I.r. . �',w.,".,- ..�y.t....,�. r x )' �� t k ,.., �.yt"..�.. ..
.-r . - � .- '
"� ' : . ..,� 1'oSC'.�.l._`.,w''4-�`'�.jk.GR�-��' �'u-E- G���_ ; "= ��";�;, _ �, • -a' . �r;. _;.
... ' - � ,,- ,. � �.� �� _ . �,..,,-i.•-�.tr� .. . ` • «-• r-,,.-� a,� :.
.r . �,: ` . '� "' �!`i�.�s�iCt�('�,c^hE i�... a �-i~'QG-� O»,S � �` �.�.j} y tt� ta 2- .r� {�6 ( n�, C:.i= r..r � t� �f� . � ; � , .
.+r�' ��`.�� -�� _ ..�-�:� � -,.i" ?- .-i-�- -+'f':�.. . ...i_--..r :r"� ,7'i•c„t.3: �-�..... _.,, a�.i.. .�.r : �' -,1,.,.,, ,r' . .
Q"� -a.}' ��='Y� riL�.r �*V-- �� .�,� _ -�_� , � 'OL„� "".�„ � .r� - _
� ; e�tieiQ +:=�-`' ' ',,�-- �� �.; � : d�, -�,�_� :c.c�, -�-�,�.�.• ,�. � .._-��..
i.�"i-l.7� ✓r�fl :' f iY V�4e. � � ]� � �� � ~ � y f ��f '��L. �'� 3� �•#� , 4� '� 4 � `; �,~
{.-� � --�.:.Y,. �� a Y ..:-.,rt_>^� .}a,.., ; p..:. �a. .
`• x_, ,.,c.} : '.�" , ..}. "..� 7'r' y...:...._a ..�,�.....,,.L.cri•'.. * .,w,Y`N`rr 4i w" ,
..�- .r_ ti... , v n yr
� ~'�. � �s�a��
. ..�.' . ..�,....� �,�,�'„� ; � .�.. �,: � r...�.f�� .: �tQ�i'����.�'"..�e.C�it�GY, u?�n���fi�:t..i% � ,', �'.
I � t�,' , � e , ��' } .!�' �t� � F `i:' z ,. : �`-,
r __�`�-�:� `,� ` o- ,'•`.�•'"',� '" t`� ' /' `` �.�j:.F.y - ���..'f"i"t��- c�'!3et� jC', tt�r�(%_-.'r„� "f JT rY; _
- �' =%�; � F�'u.-r � � ��: r. �., :�..
, ' �„� i ��'•�.�l.' M1i � t �' �D. `7E � o' :' � �._ i �� i+ 1 i� C r n" ' �Y�<�"" � .- •` �... w-
� C:�e. t� �42:. •�---.�.:...-_.
,.��-' � t s ��c.. �.,..�,<.;�:,
.r,�� �...' r Y� "�'t,�.}
��f'� �`,�._ j`�w,�4 .
�7. Rr _ .�' ^_ , ��
�'X� .
��. �'� .�l`,,�'V�%
:Gr.—i- :a.i. .s ,. 1 'f'�.sa�f
TO:
ATTEN710N:
FROM:
NUMBEFi OF PA�ES: {including cover)
. �, � .�.. , . • � .-�r�, -.�..,, ^ �:,
s + ,., � . `� �`� l.•
� ,..-a �._.-� �'^-t-'�-ir+;:,�. _.I,,_.'
�' ' ,,�} �''/^�� r �., , 4 �.
t '_ i•� R�' �'^. S J���nt I y.` '"?".
+ $r - ` '�`"r „yi,i�,�-�+ - Y �
1 = y,+�G:-'t"�::ba ,� r .....;�_ �, � }...�.,:'z
_ 3 .y�a��.ay�� �„if. _ �. A���{..�.=4..
_; ";r,R.� r,.
�' *y�O � �.: t
'{r� .. �„� 1. '; " " .""^'.r".`� x ,i-
���� ~ •�� F" •� y�T`�,..
1 '
Y:�..'Q;t��!�!-�.., ,.�.�'.�::a.; : ':r.',-_,.'
� �� r,� P�
.,�-�c� t';�"�'^K �':�.c' ' +.��' .- t.y,.., ,.r.''M--+':.
, ^�,. � ✓'�• _ . ``' � ,--' .r .;; , ,
�. `��.,.�.u..-�. �.«�.r' ' i-�,,.F m.._ _e � . .f, �
t +, �,� /�,�; 1 � ` �y' �.�
� .y.. ,Mr�S�' ` �y4�.... r...,:� : 'ti« . � ...y,..*y��
�,,� � � '.}„ � .� �
�'�'_ �"..�.�- �.�'^.i.;` " _+�._>,�w. ' �,' ` , i` `
-..,��' '`vi'' �,
' � , •.�,;•-- - -.;�.-
� .;�-
" :; . i,. .� °,� ; . .
... y�s.'� . ,}. .t,,.y . .. _ ..
r �.+•�••�s;'"�`�r.F..�- .�
� .V %�"i�,U Y ) ._� ..�_._�.``��., .. . ..._ ,
STOCKINt� DISTRIB
8
_ � � ., �..� `�'��,
z� '��.
1� � �,.. �.,.
.
1 �i'�. � u 1
#S18 New Brightan Blvd. • Minneapolis, MN 55413 • 80�-73
� r . �
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
►��iSL��
August 31, 1995
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist �
SUBJECT: Case No. 95-21: AT&T Wireless Services - CUP and Varian
DISCUSSION
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their Aug�l
1995 meeting to consider a request from AT&T Wireless Services for a C�
Use Permit for a Cellular Telephone Transmission Tower, a Variance for T
Height to allow a one hundred twenty-five foot (125') tall transmission to
a Variance for Building Setback. Mr. Peter Beck, attorney, Mr. Max Thon
AT&T and Mr. Ted Olson, of AT&T, appeared at this hearing as represeni
AT&T. As City Council is aware, construction of the tower and equipmei
building occurred without the required building permit and inspections an�
planning application is being process after the fact. A stop work order h�
prevented this tower from being put into service. (Please see attached PI
Report and Application). .
At the Planning Commission meeting, there were many concerns ai
reservations expressed about both the tower and the building. Primarily,
were expressed about the location of this facility along Highway 55 in Af�
designated as a gateway to the City in the Highway 55 Corridor Study.
Specifically, the Planning Commission was concerned about the lack of
architectural details and poor quality of the facade on the equipment builc
lack of paved bituminous access road, the lack of landscaping or any ade
screening of the structure and its close proximity to the highway right-of-
fence along 1-494. The Planning Commission felt that had this project be�
properly permitted and reviewed, many of these concerns could have bee
addressed in the design of the project.
The Planning Commission felt there was no hardship demonstrated
the building setback or the tower height. The building is located approxin
�t 22,
mditional
�wer
ver and
pson, of
�tives of
t �
this
�
inner's
d
:oncerns
area
ng, the
uate
either
�
fifteen feet (15') from the highway right-of-way fence and typically fo feet (40')
would be required for all structures fronting on the freeway in the indus rial park.
(Please see setback variance section in Planner's Report). This building is very
visible to freeway traffic and lacks screening. Consideration should be � iven to
the architectural design and materials for compatibility to the industrial �ark
neighborhood it is in.
The Planning Commission was not convinced that the tower nee
one hundred twenty-five feet (125') tall. AT&T stated that they had
documentation to that need and also completed further testing to deter
necessary heights for proper cellular transmission in this area. AT&T p
bring this documentation to the City Council meeting and/or have it del
the members of the Council prior to the meeting.
The City received a call from Mr. Steve Hurvitz, an attorney with
on August 22, 1995. Mr. Hurvitz called to say the lease has not yet be
with AT&T, because they have received only tentative approval from Ff
There are five (5) conditions required for FHWA approval which have nc
given. As of August 22, 1995, AT&T had not provided the information
to meet these five (5) conditions therefore the federal government has r
given its approval and the construction of this facility is at their own ris
Since the public hearing, the City has received a letter of support
citizen who uses cellular telephones. (Please see attached letter).
RECOMMENDATION
to be
ine the
�mised to
ered to
InDOT,
� signed
VA.
yet been
ecessary
t yet
ma
The Planning Commission voted 3-2 (Nays: Duggan, Koll) to reco mend
denial of the requested Variances and Conditional Use Permit as a result, f finding
no established hardships for the Variances. The Planning Commission al o
requested that Council direct them to prepare an ordinance that would s ecifically
address future cellular tower requests with the City.
ACTION REQUIRED
Meet with the applicant and then if Council desires to implement
Planning Commission's recorx�mendation, they should pass a motion dir
to prepare the appropriate Resolution of Denial.
KLB:kkb
a
ng staff
Lighting
August 28, 1995
���ayur r�Gr ��Gnaa�v
Ciiy of Mendoia Heights
1101 Vicioria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mayor Meritensa�to:
Accessories
�G
I am writing �his letter regarding ihe situation that has arisen with AT�
Wireless application for a site on Highway 494 Er 55.
As a resideni of Mendota Heights and a user of ATE�T Wireless, I feel ii
important �o have this iower and extended service to this area. I use r
teiephone (mobile phone) quite of�en and when I am using the phone,
phone calls or sta�ic interrupts my calls. Thai prohibits me from doin�
business when I am driving to my appointments from home. It is very
embarrassing when I lose a call wi�h my accounts as he or she is giving
some vatuable information. I am hopingyou will approve this locaiior
would �benefit me greatly.
iture
very
iose
it � _.
Also in regard to the loca�ion of the tower, I travel the area periodicali and
really have not noticed the pole. It biends into the looks of surroundin , light
potes of similar heighi and cotor. I do not believe i� hinders the enviro meni.
I would appreciate ii if this tetter could be included in ihe Council
before ihe September 5tM meeting.
Sincerely,
Ron Sterenson
�� ,
FEDERAL AVIATION AD�MINISTRATION
6reat Lakes Region. AGL-530
�00 East Devon Avenue
Oes Plaines. IL 60018
PROPONENT:
Alan Fox
McCaw Cellular of MN
2515 24th Ave. South
Minneapolis. MN 55406
In Reply Refer To
AERONAIliICAL Sl'UDY N0.
95-AGL-2365-OE
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION
CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED: Antenna Tower
FREQUENCY: 824-894 MHi
EFFECTIVE RADIATED POWER (ERP): 500 W
CONSTRUCTION LOCATION (NAD �3):
Mendflta Hts. MN I
LATIIUDE : 44-51- 44.5
LONGIIllDE: 93- 9- 5.6
AGL M5L
HEIGFlT: 135. ft 1020. �t
The Federal Aviation Ad�ninistration acknowledges receipt of notice dated 05/16/95, concerning thelproposed construction
or alteration described above. � �
A study has been conducted under the provisions of Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations to determine whether the
proposed construction would be an obstruction to air navigation. whether it should be marked and ighted to enhance
safety in air navigation. and whether supplemerttal notice of start and co�upletion of construrtion is required to pertrrit
timely charting and notification to airmen. The findings of that study are as follows:
The proposed construction is not identified as an obstruction under any standard of FAR,
not be a hazard to air navigation.
This determination expires on 12/16/95 unless:
(a) extended, revised or terminated by the issuing office;
. Subpart C and Nould
(b) the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Comaunications Comm'ission and an
application for a constructian perarit is made to the FCC on or before the above expi�atio date. In such case.
the deternri nation expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for coa�pletion of constructio , or on the date
the FCC denies the application. ' .
NOTE: My request fo� extension of the effective periad of this determination must be postmarked
issuing office at least 15 days prior to the expiration date.
If the structure is subject to the licensirrg autharity of the FCC. a copy of this acknowledgement
Agency.
Remarks:
Si
»» NOTICE IS REQUIRED ANYTII� THE PROJECT IS ABANQONED OR THE PROPOSAL IS
»> SEE PAGE 2 FOR COMPLIANCE REQUIREM4ENT5 PR'IOR TO OPERATIN6 7RANSMITIER «<
�
Gri f h
ystem Management Branch
Issued In: Qes Plaines, Illinois
On: 06/12/95
delivered to the
11 be serrt to that
««
� � .
THIS EVALUATION IS BASID �T Tf� ASSONSPTION THAT YOIJR
EQUIPMENT MEETS O1�Y MINIMtIM FCC STAI�IDARDS FOR SPURIOUS
Et�SSIONS. TF�REF'ORE, AT LEA�r QNE WEIIZ PRIOR �0 BEGINNZNG
ANY TRANS[�'BSSION FROM YOUR FACILITY, PLEASE CONrACT Ti�E FAA
SPF.CIRIJM M�ANAGE[�]T OFFICER AT (708) 294-7612 Tn ARRANGE
PRUCEDURE.S TO VERIFY ZHAT NO INTEEtFEEtED1GE• IS CAt1SID. YO�U
MAY NEED TO II�LAY EX'TRA FILTIItING OR TAi� OTf�R
M�ASUI2ES IF YOUR TRANS�'iIISSIQNS DISRUPT OZ�R SERVICES.
THE FCC REQUIRES ITS LICFNSEES Z�0 COOPERATE FULLY WITH
OTf�t FEDERAL AGIIJCIES, IN �iIS CASE � FAA, Zn
a� i �� � � i � �• �• � N • �• �� : i
F1�LLOWING REQUIRE�1'I5:
F�C REQUIREi�TTS IN:
47 C.F.R. 73.44(c) (AM broadcast stations)
47 C.F.R. 22.907(i) (fixed cellular transmitters)
47 C.F.R. 21.1Q6(b) (co�on carrier fixed microwave transmitters)
47 C.F.R. 74.23(a) (broadcast auxi].iary transmitters)
47 C.F.R. 94.71(d) (operational fixed microwave transmitters)
PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES
.
1�
LILTE/G��r�Ff,4
�
July 21, 1995
INSPECTION RECORD
DATE OF INSPECTION:
CLIE�NT :
PROJECT:
IIES PROJECT NQ,:
INSPECTED BY:
WEATSEA:
ULTElG ENGlI''�IEER�, irvc.
5201 E�1ST iiIVER ROAQ SUITE 30B MINMEAPOUS, MN SSf21
July 15, 1995
AT&T Ai=eiess Services
Mendota 8eights 3ite
95544 ����% f
Seff Schmit �Q�
80° F. and C u
Schmit visited the site for an inspection cf the monoga
installatian per the request of Ted Braich of AT&T �
SE'.r'V1.C@S. T�'1� fa2lawing W18 noted:
� 1. The excavation for the monopole base was complete
apenzng was cased at the time of �he site vi.sit.
material was visible at the bot�tom and no water was
in the excavation. �
2.
3.
4.
The pole base had 19 feet of mastic applied.
The po2e baseplate was 57 inches in diameter and the
been excavated to five (5} feet in diameter.
The pole base was set 18 feet below grade in
�Ghe �tructural drawings.
? 612-SJt•2500
X 6t2•5?t-tt86
base
eless
i the
nular
erved
e had
with
5. The pole base was backfilled and"'compacted in approx�.mately
three {3} foat iifts with Class 5 in accordance w.�th the
drawings. � i
6. �I'wo (2} additional sections of pole were set
excavation for fihe shelter foundation was started.
due to heavy rains, construction was halted and a
�ime of 8:00 a.m. on 7/16/95 was set.
, -
c: Rurt iiartner, MnDOT
�--. ,
��t�:Pr, AT&T Wireless Services
Steve Katkov, OMNI Contractinq
JRS:mg.23
EQUAG QPPORTUNrI'Y EMPLOYER
the
er,
�� CONSULTING ENGINEERS
_i �
i
July 21, 1995
INSPECTION RECORD
DATE OF INSPECTION:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
IIEI PROJECT NO.:
INSPECTED BY:
WEATHER:
Schmit visited
foundations per
Services.
e�2-s�+-zsoo
: 6�2-577-7788
ULTEIG ENGINEERS, irvc.
5201 EASf RNEA ROAO, SUITE 30E MINNF�4POUS, MN 55�2t
July 16, 1995
AT�T Wireless Services
Mendota Heiqht Si
95544 C�
Jeff Schmit �
95' F. and C
the site for an inspection of the shelter
the request of Ted Broich of AT&T �ireless
1. Excavation was completed to five (5') feet and black dirt was
observed. Excavation continued to approximately se�en (7')
feet were granular material was observed. The excava ion was
brought up to five (5') feet with compacted Class 5.
2. The excavation was backfilled approximately two (2') feet in
six (6n) inch lifts and compacted.
3. Galvanized steel was set and plumbed. Ji.m of OrIldI Con acting
verified the foundation elevations with a transit and stated
that the steel was set within a 1/4n tolerance.
�
4. The steel was not coated with bitumastic as required by��the
steel general notes on sheet S1. Ed of AT&T Wireless S rvices
was informed and he stated that the galvanizing al�ne was
acceptable to AT&T Wireless Services.
5. All bolts were securely fastened before backfilling.
6. The columns were backfil3ed to within approximately
foot of the steel beams in one (1�) foot lifts and c
Topsoil was used to finish off the excavations.
7.
8.
9.
The polyvapor barrier was placed on the topsoil.
Rubber pads and 1/8-3/8n steel shi.ms were set on the
ta level the shelter.
The stoop foundation will be completed at a later da
c: Kurt Hartner, MnDOT
-�.�:__.....
�``:B�aF�e��r rAT&T Wireless Services
Steve Katkov, O1�1I Contracting
��•° '•�
.
,
�C E'
C EQUAL OPPOR'RJNITY EMPLAYER
��i�e``
ie (1' )
iacted.
:olumns
�
�
�t
:�
�
:`�
.
.�
�
�
�+'
�"
A Geotechnical Evaluation Report
AT&T Wireless Services
0
Proposed Cellular Tower and Equipmern Shelter
Mendota Heights, IVfnnesota
Project BABX 95 206
July 10, 1995
Braun Intertec Corporation
� B Rau NSM
I NTE RTEC
r�y io, 1995
IV11. T� BIO1C,�1
ATB�T Wireless Services
2515 24th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55406-1218
Dear Mr. Broich:
0
Braun lotertac CorPornfion �
6801 Washingron A ue Souih
P.O. Box 39108
Minneapolis, Minn 55439-0108
612-9415600 F�c 41-4151
Engineers and Scienfi Serving
tf�e Buil! and Nahrrol �nvironments'
Project
Re: Geotechnical Evaluation for the Progosed Cellnlar Tower and Equipme�
Mendota Heights, 1Vlinnesota �
Site in
�� As you authorized, we have completed �e geotechnical evaluation for the pmposed T&'r
Wireless Services cellular tower and shelter bu�ding in Me�dota Heights,lVfmnesa One
standard penetration test boring was completed to a d� of 30 fe�. SoiLs ea ed in the
� boring consiste� of 4 feet of sandy lean clay fill abave a S-foot layer of lean clay or �ty clay
followed by poorly graded sand to the termination depth of the boring. Grouad was aot
observed in this test boring. . �
�
�
�
�
.q
;3
�
�
Please refes to the attaGhed report for a more det�ed summary of our analyses aad
recommendations for design and construction of the new tower aad shelter bu�ding.
It has been a pleasure performing these services for yau. If qou have'any qaestions
this report, or if you require additional information, please call Henry Vloo at (612)
Sincerely, '
(��LG� - .
�orZ.
Matt P. Ruble
Staff Engineer .- .
�
Henry Vloo, PE
Project Engineer ,
Attachment:
Geotechnical Evaluation Report
c: Mr. Brian Long
�' Ulteig Engineers
�r
�
mprwv�rah:mj.�babx\georpd9s206
=fi
�
��,,
1779.
'��
.. ;'
,;.
.,�,�
��
�
�
�
,��
.:.a '
Table of Contents
Description
A. Introductioa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A.1. Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . » . . . . . . . . .
A.2. Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A.3. Scope ....................................... ....
A.4. �}OCti1il�IltS FI4Vl{�� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
� A.5. Locarion and IIevation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. Results ............................................ ....
B.1. Log ...................................... . ....
B.2, Soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B.3. Groundwater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B.4, Labaratory Testing . . . . . » . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B.S. Em�ironmental Screening . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page
1
1
1
i
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
G. Analyses and Recomm.endations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
� C.1. Proposed Conshudion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
C.2. Tower Desiga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
C.3. Equipment Shelter Buildiag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . 4
D. Cot��;ttion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . 4
E. Proceduzes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
E.1. DrilIing and Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S
E.2. 542� C1aSSIfi.qIiOIl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
E.3. Contamination Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , 5
E.4. Groundwater Qbservations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
. �,
. ' F. Generai Recoinrneadations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
� � F.1. Basis of Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
- F.2. Review of Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
� ` F.3. Groundwater Fiuctuations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-.:'� F.4. Use of Repart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F.S. Levet of Caze . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
� Professional Certification
Appendix
�= Boring Location Sketch
- Descriptive Terminology
Lag of Boring Sheet
� iDrganic Vapor Field Dat�a Sheet
J- Boring Sea2ing Recard
�
s:
�i
6
6�
6
6
7
7
r
� ' � .
r�
�i
r'
� RA`I N.SM
I NTE RTEC
A. Introduction
Braun IoMrfec Co�or+ation
6801 Washinglan A ue South
P.O. Box 39108 • '
Minneapolis, Minn � 55439-0108
612-9415600 Fax: 41-4T51
Engineea ond Scienfi Serving
fha Buifl and Nalural E�nvironments'
A.1. Proj ect
� It is our understanding that AT&T Wireless Services is planning to construct a new
tower and equipment shelter building in Mendota Heights, Nfinnesota. This site is �
southwest comer of the intersection of Northland Drive and Highway 55.
A.2. P�rpose
The purpose of qur geotechnical evaluation was to evaluate subsurface soils. and ��
groundwater conditions at the proposed cellular tower site in Mendota Heights. '
information gathered during our evaluation w�l be used to assist ATB�T Wireless
Ulteig Engineers in designing the foundation system for the pmposed tower and s
building.
A.3. Scope .
One standard penetration test boring was pe,rformed to an approximate dep� of 30
center of the proposed tower. As part of our evaluation, two gradation tests were ;
: on select so� samples. As the soil boring was being completed, a photoionixati.on
•� used to screen the soil samples for poss�le environmental contamination.
�
�
the
and
at the
�ffi�
tor was
Prior to completing this report, the results of the boring were discussed with Mr. T Bmich of
AT&T Wireless Services and Mr. Brian Long of Ulteig Engine�rs. Based on the r ts of this
boring and laboratory tests, this engineering report was prepazed addressing onr anal � es and
recommendations. _ � . �
A.4. Documents Provided
The site plan showing the proposed cellular tower site was provided to us. The plan
prepazed by Graham and Associates, Inc., and dated May 11, 1995.
A.S. Location and Elevation
�� The boring was performed at the location s� in the field by Graham and �
location is the approximate center of the proposed tower. The ground surface
boring was 885.1, as shown on the site plan provided.
d
: This
� at the
AT&T Wirel�
��� B�D
7uly 10, 1995
Page 2
B. Results
B.1. Log
A Log of Boring sheet indicating the depths and ideatifications of the various so� ;
penetration resistances, laboratory test data and groundwater observations is attaGh�
strata changes were inferred from the changes in the penetration test samples and �
cuttings. It should be noted that the depths shown as changes between the sorata a�
approximate. The changes aze l�ely transitions and �e depths of �e changes like
from the horing. , .
Geologic origins presented for each stratum on the Log of Boring sheets are based
types, blows per foot, and available common knowledge of the depositional history
Because of the complex glacial and post-glacial depositionai environments, geologi�
frequently difficult to ascertain. A detailed investigation of the geologic history of
not performed.
s���
The
o�y
vary away
�n ihe soil
�f the site.
origins aze
he site was
,_ B.2. Soils
. Soils enoouatered in �e boring consisted of 4 feet of sa�dy lean clay fill overlying layer of
�.
� lean clay and s�ty clay to a depth of 9 feet. Below 9 feet, �e boring encouatered rly .
y� graded sand to the termination depth of the boring.
i
�- The recorded penetration resistances in the natural clays ranged from 4 to 15 blows pes foot
. (BP�, indicating these soils to be rather soft to stiff. �'he recorded penetration res ces ia
? the poorly graded sand layers ranged from 6 to 25 BPF, indicating these so�s to be loose to
��
i � medium dense. _ .
B.3. Groundwater
Groundwater was not observed during dn7ling or after the hollow-stem auger had
termination depth of the boring. The borehole was immediately bacl�'illed with g
B.4. Laboratory Testing
�- To assist in classifying the soils, we completed two gradation tests according to Am
Society for Testing and Materials (ASTNn procedures. The results of these tests ca
Y in the right hand margin of the Log of Boring sheet in �e Appendix of this report.
the
i be found
_r
i
�
ATB� Wirele
Project BAB�s
July 10, 1995
Page 3
B.S. Environmental Screening
During completion of the soil boring, the recovered soil samples were screened for
of organic vapors using a photoionization detector. Organic vapors were not detecx�
the samples tested. The organic vapor field data sheets indicating the headspace re�
soil samples obtained aze attached to the Appendiz of this report.
C. Analyses and Recommendations
C.1. Proposed Construction
�. We understand AT&T Wireless Services proposes to constrnct a 125-foot-tall mono�
; Mendota Heights site. Due to the absence of groundwater in t�e boring hole, this p�
directly embedded into the underlying soils. The d�th of embedment of the drilled
� depend on the tower loads that w�l be supplied by the tower maanfacturer and so� 1
provided by Braun Intertec.
� �
� A prefabricatecl equipment shelter w�l also be placed adjaceut to the proposed tower
Mr. Long indicated the shelter bu�ding will be one of �e heavier versions which ty�
� weighs approaimately 60,OQ0 pounds and measures 12 feet by 28 f�eex. Mr. Long in�
j steel foundation system will be used for this building, which w�l l�ely oonsist of ste
� placed in the bottom drilled shafts tio depths of 41/2 to S fe� below the snrface. Th
} shafts will be placed at the corners of the building and the steel footings w�l be desi�
eaert maximum soil bearing pressures of 3,000 pounds.per square foot (psfl.
- C.2. Tower Design _- .
. The following tabuladon summarizes the soils encountered in the boring, the dep� az
_ soils were encountered, and the assumed� soil parameters which are recommended for
designing the drilled piers. The values should be considered ultimate values; thus, th�
. resistances generated should inc�ude a factor of safety. ff acxual soil parameters are d
' recommend additional samples be collected for testing.
�-
,
�
Services
:Presence
in any of
nQs of
, at the
can be
r w�l
�tea a
plates
drilled
ed tu
in
the
we
Soi11`ype
Fill: CL
CL/CLML
SP
SP
Depth
(feet)
0-4
49
9-18
18-30
A- Negled for design purposes.
Wet Unit
�Vaght (pc�
110
115
115
124
ATS�T Wireles�
Project BABX'
July 10, 1995
Page 4
Internal Angle
of F%idion
. �d��)
. A
20
32
35
Cohesion should only be used to design for short-term loads. For long-�erm
appmaches zero and interaal angle of frictioa is used for design. The design
least amount of resistance should govern.
For a drilled pier approximately 15 feet deep, it is our opinion an end-bearing
3,000 psf may be used for design.
C.3. Equipment Shelter Bu�ding
The underlying soils aze generally suitable for support of the eqaipme,nt shelter bu�di
modified spread footing constructed of steel. The foundations shonld be sized svc� �
exert a net allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. We estimate seuleme� to be les
inch under the assumed loads.
D. Construction
• As the auger shaft for the drilled piers for the tower and equipment shelter are being
�` constructed, it should be a�icipated that temporary steel casing or dn'lling mud w�l b
� to prevent sloughing into the eaccavation.
��-
We recommend the excavations be observed by a geatechnical engineer to evaluate if
r,
� subgrade soils aze similar to those encournered in the boring and adequate to support �
�' proposed construction.
�
;; • .
�
�r•
y
Services
A
500
0
0
oohesion
;the
of
ng nsing a
iat they
s than 1/2
� needed
r-�.
_:� .
I���
��
"'3
{
..1
�
�
�
�
AT&T WirelE
Project BAB7�
July 10, 1995
Page 5
E. Procedures
E.1. Drilling and Sampling
The penetration test boring was performed on June 15, 1995, with a core and auger
equipped with 3 1/4inch inside diameter hollow-stem auger mounted on an off-road
Sampling for the horing was conducted in general accordance with ASTM D 1586,
"Penetration Test aad Split Bazrel Sampling of Soils." Using this method, we advai
borehole with the hollow-stem auger to the desired test depth. A 140�ound hamm�
30 inches was then used to drive the standazd 2-inch split�arrel sampler a total pene
Services
�ed the
falling
ration of
1 1/2 feet below the tip of the hollow-stem auger. The blows for the last foot of pe etration
were recorded and are an index of soil�strength charaderistics. Samples were taken
21/Z-foot vertical intervals to the 15 foot depth and then at 5 foot irnervals to the ''o
depths of �e boring. A representative portion of each sample was then sealed in a glass jaz.
E.2. Soil Classification
Soils encountered in the boring were visually and mamially classified ia the field by
chief in generat accordance with ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of ;
(Visual-Mamial Procedures)." A summary of the ASTM classification system is atta
samples were then returned to our laboratory for review of the field classifications b;
engineer. Representative samples w�l remaia in our Nfinneapolis office for a period
to be available for your eaamination
E.3. Contamination Detection
� Soil samples retrievefl using the split-barrel sampler were scanned for the presence i
vapors using a photoionization detector_(PID) equipge� with a 10.2 eV lamp and cal
� an isoburylene standard. Soils recovered from the split-barrel sampler were additioi
�'
,� � . analyzed with a PID using jaz headspace procedures. The jar headspace procedure �
filling a 250 milliliter jar half-full of soil. The opening of the jar was �en covered
��; aluminum foil and the cap tight�y screwed on. The jaz was then vigomusly shaken i
�' seconds and allowed to set for a least 10 minutes. Following the 10-minute period,
was again vigorously shaken for 15 seconds. The cap was thea unscrewed and the ]
�- was inserted on half the headspace depth. The highest reading observed on the PID
recorded.
r
F
�'
�'
�"
crew
�ed. All
a so�s
�f 60 days
[�
of
15
sample
pmbe
�
ATB�T Wireles
Project BABX
July 10, 1995
Page 6
E.4. Groundwater Observations
Immediately after taking the final sample in the bottom of tb.e boring, the hole was
through the hollow-stem auger to check for the presence of groundwater. The bori�
immediately backfilled with bentonite grout according to Niinnesota Deparmaent of i
regulations. A copy of the boring sealing record is attached to the Appendix of this
F. General Recommendations
F.1. Basis of Recommendations
The analyses and recommendations submitted in this report aze based upon the data
from the so� boring performed at the location indicated on the attached sketch. Of%
variations accur bexweea the boring and surrounding so�s, �e nature and eatent of �
not become evide� until additional exploration or construction is conducted. A reea
of the recommendations in this report should be made afier per�orming on-site obser
during construction to note the characteristics of any variations. The variations may
addidonal foundation costs, and it is suggested that a coatingency be provided for thi
Services
vvas then
report.
�n
in
� �.
� It is recommended that we be retained to perforna the observation and testing progra� for the
-' construction phase of this project. This will allow correlation of the so� conditions �noouatered
during construction to the soil borings, and w�l pmvide continuity of professional
_a responsib�ity.
� F.2. Review of Design
'" This report is based on the design of th,e proposed structure as related to us for prep 'on of
• this report. It is recommended that we be retained to review the geotechnical aspeds of the
__ designs and specifications. With the review, we will evalnate whether any changes i� design
have affected the validity of the recommendations, and whether our reoommendations have been
conectly interpreted and imple;nented in the design and specifiications. .
� F.3. Groundwater Fluctuations
,, We made water level observations ia the borings at the times and under the
the boring log. These data were interpreted in the text of this report. The period of
_ observation was relatively short, and fluctuation in the groundwater level may occur c
�� rainfall, flooding, irrigation, spring thaw, drainage, and other seasonal and annual fac
stated on
to
c not
AT&T wu��
Project BABx
7uly 10, 1995
Page 7
evident at the time the observations were made. Design drawings and
construction planning should recognize the possibility of fluctuarions.
' F.4. Use of Report
. This report is for the ezclusive use of the addre.ssee and the copied parties to use to
,._ proposed structure and prepare construction docaments. In the absence of our wriu
approval, we make no representation aad assume no respons��lity to other parties r
' this report. The data, analyses and recommendations may aot be appropriate for o�
��� structures or purposes. We recommend that parties contemplating other structures c
, contact us. '
�
�
:.:
F.S. Leve1 of Care
Services performed by Braun Intertec Corporation personnel for this project have
conducted with that level of care and sk�l ordinan7y exercised bq members of the
currently practicing in this azea under similar budget and time restraints. No wan
expressed or implied, is made. .
Sincerely,
. �- Professional CertiFcation
I hereby certify that this report was prepazed under my
: direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
� Pmfessional Engineer under the laws of the State of
Minnesota •
Henry Vloo, PE
Project Engineer
Registration Number: 21140 �
s��
�
the
purposes
t''
' -:;
Ap.PendiY
r�
:�
N
30' 0 80'
SCALE 1"=60'
BRAYH'
INTERTEC
_ � �
NORTHLAND' DRIVE
... � � •
�
I - ~��_, �
I � � �
� � ��I
� SCAVENGING
f STAT10dV �
� ' '
� I �
f �
2
¢I
� /.
2f y'
� �I '
NI �� /
;. �� .
;I ^� /
N' � /
, � _/.
I 4�
� Q�
. V:/
J/
�
NSP VAIVE /
STATION . �
"�.. � ' 1�
PROPOSED SHELTER
I
�
�
�
� �. — OENO S APPROXIMATE
I LOCA 0�1 OF STANDARD
PENE A710N TEST B�ING.
I
I
I
I
I
�
I .
I
I
1
i
I
� x
I �
I �
� �
�
I .
�
I
PROPOSEDITOWER I
SOIL BORING LOCATION SKETCH
PROPOSED CELLULAR SITE. NORTHLAND DR. k HWY. 55
ATdcT WIRELESS SERVICES
MENOOTA HEIGHTS. MINNESOTA
�
I
I
I
I
�
fNT REHSION SHEET
�Rnwr1 eY: K R OB-22-95 1
A�b BY: H 06-22-95 �
� �- BAB� —95-206 • 1
DWG. Na qgg p$ FlGURE N0.
SCALE � �� Q� �
I
� � �OG QF BOR1111G
PROJECT: BA.BX 95-206 - BORING: • T-1
GEUTECi�IiCAL EYALUAIZQN �,(}GATION:
Proposed Ceiiular Une Site See attached s1c
H'ighway 55 and Northland Drive
Meudot2t Heights, ltr�inttesOta
DRILLER: M. Rowland METI�QD: 3 1!4" HSA DATE: 6l1519S SCALE: 1" = 4'
Etev. Depth ASTM
8$S.1 4.0 Symbal Descriptian of Materials BPF Tesfs ar Notes
na
��- ;�;� FILL: Sandy I.tan Ctay, with a ttace of fibers, with E v�tioa Rcference•
; �; � a trace of fine- to caarse Gravel, with layer of Ei vation at borin 1oc�sion
� �`� Pooriy Graded Sand, dar3c brawn and hrawa, maist o' aa fmm Site Plan.
�, �, W we� g
, �,!
,+:�
881.1 4.0 �!�! '
7
,
' S!L"TY CLAY, browri; mQlst W wet, ratthet SOft.
(Aituvium)
::• Pt}ORLY GRADED SAND, fir�.- to
:'; medium-grained, with a tirace of fine Gravel, with
;:� ienses of Silty Saad, breswn, moist, ioose to very
'= IWSe. �
(A1�UV111II2�
..`_
'::
'';=
.
:• YUUKLY tiKAllf*:Ll SANll, fii�e• #o .,
medium-grained, with a trace of Sne Gravel, light
''r�� brown, moist, mediexm dense.
�'t= tGiaciat Out�vash)
•.r, .
''r; .
��r�
•�i;
END OF BORiNG. *
Bnwn
15
4
7
6 I I See
7
���
W
graia siza
i cnrva
graia size
.curva.
��
* W r not observad with 29'
af hol2 w-stem �sugar ia ihe
1'7 S�an .
* Ba ' g inxmediataly
bxc a+ith CJroni.
SI'-1 psge 1 ot 1
t '� �. "s' �. • �..�'� ai. ` . � "� �.:. ` � �� •••N �. . ...� Y � � �r:.•.:� �. _ .....J � .. -... 3 � ' __ .. ✓ .�::'��
�r :. � ' w�� �i,.. �� �� -- � •- a�i ' ��
GRAIN SIZE ACCUMULATION CURV�
GRAVEL
COARSE MEDIUM FINE
100 3" 1"3/4"1/2" 3/8" 4 10
U. S.
90
80
c�
�
� 50
� 40
�
a
K�
0
PARTICLE DIAMETER, mm
c
i
. _..._.� .. .�
�� ai
PR07ECTt BABX=95-206 GRAVEL 8.3 %
B R AV H r Cellular One � ��ASGTFTCATTONs
SAND 87.0 i SP, Poorl� eraded sand
i NT E RT E C Mendota Hei9hts, MN SILT AND CLAY 4.? X w�th a trace of eravel,
BORINGt - ST-01 f-c 9rained, brown
• SAMPLEi 8 Cu 4.9 060a0.86 D30=0.35 D10=0.18
DEPTHt 20.0'-' Cc 0.8
�
� B Rau N=M
I NTE RTEC
Braun Inte�iec '
6801 Woshington A ue South
P.O. Box 39108 �
Minneapolis, Min 55439-0108
612-9415600 Fa�c �1-4151
Engineen and Sdertti Serving
fhe BuiU and IVoturvl Eiivironmenh�
Organic Vapor �eld Data Sheet
Boring Identification: ST-1 Project: BABX 95-ZOb Date:
weather Conditions: S�nay, 90°F . '
Field Personnel: Frank Baklce
Auger Steam Cleaned? yes No XX (FicLometer)
Sampler Cleaned Between Samples: Yes XX No
Method: TSP and water rinse
- (unless c;ontaminate�
Detector: FID PID: 10.6eV X Cali'bratioa Gas: isobntqle�e
Date: 6/15/95
Depth� Anger. Split Spoon Headspace
(feet) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
2.5 0.0
5.0 0.0
7.5 �.0
10.0 0.0
15.0 0.0
Z0.0 0.0
25.0 0.0 "
30.0 0.0
mkmlbabxltests�95206
Notes/Geology
No aoticeable smell by nose
No noticeable smoll by nose
No noticeable smell by nose
No n�oticeable sme11 by aose
No noticeable smell by aose
No noticeabk smell by nose
No noticeable smell by aose
No noticeable smell by nose
6/15/95
'_' ' " _ _" ' ' • • v � .I 1 :,�
`: ��» WELLAND BORING SEALING RECORD��u�No.
� A k� r A Minnesota Statutes. Chapter 1031 a W-senes No.
«.�»�t��
Tovr�sh�p Nam� TownstxP No. Rangs No. SeUion No. Fractan (sm. • k�.l Date Seallo Approxrrwte Oat� WeM
rrw
• n Z i � or eonng C«ntnKced r
�� N z3 tn/ �- c,.��.N s, r.'- -��' y 5 -/> - 7S
• enarKa+ Straet Aaaress « FKs NurtWe. a�a cky a wex o. ewrg t.ocatan
� j'Y) e�/ � 0/ fi f) G 1�/l / 7 D•atl+ eerae searny -� �� tt (� Deva+ �`, e.
traU buLa� d well or bon+g Skeleh map d well a borr+9 S1ane Water Lavel ❑�od
�.� __ttqn gnd w�M -X" . IOCahOn. showrfg propMy NnK• �
. N �. �,a w�,�. N � �� � ❑
� � � � � f� �,, � �.% � ,� L
I _ -; - ;- -r- -; � ,
�l � � � 1 �_p' ❑ Sinql� AQw(H ❑ MWliaquiler R.
. -'� _ �' ' L_ '�. � CAStNG TYPE
W � � � �
, � , , �' . - x �. � NA
� V -f- -,- -r- -.- s , I� --C ❑ Stees� O P�asuc � rr. � oth«
� � � � e
•.nw
� � i � �
,- - ,- -,-- -; � :� � N/a
-t SCnOn frOm 60 R Op�n hlaie from —
� �— ►esww—� Z � �`+ OBS7RUCTtOwDEBRISlRLL
:OPEATY OWNEA'S NAME ❑ Obstnxtan ❑ Oebns ❑ FiM N�'1
� ' �
� �►,,,;>z5��-l� �.>�, Jr� . f .:� �� ., . :, � c
�nna�w,g Aaaess r ainennt man propany aaa.ess w�Aatw aeow. TyP• a aea�voestn,caon
ObshuaiarvD�bra/FiN atnovad? ❑ Y�s ❑ No I
�' • PUOIP
�^ -
���
❑ RernwW ❑ Not Ptes�nt ❑ 011kr
CASIltr,
'GEQLOGICAL WTEAIAL COiOR �R�� OF � �
• FOR111AT10N
M na w+ow++. mdr�t. ewma+w wmnoon �oy r,om nwoy wN a bo�:g. oian»tx o.pn s.t r� ov�rs¢. no�.
" L�.,� �! '� � 1l L �` k i �'j 1 f f:,.t � �• �'►. ,j � in. from W R ❑ Yes ❑ No
�
� �- �� �� . � i . J. � L �'� in. hom b R. ❑ Y�s ❑ No
; ` ��. c:, �JJ n. � � �. a Y.� o�
.•I � Yi �/� 11 •� J METHOD USEO T1D SEAL ANHULAR SPACE BETNfEEN 2 CASINGS OA CASI
❑ No MrnAar Spx� Exists
G, ❑ Aixmlat spau QtoutW witlt hsrnie pip� ;/�
o��
,"
� �� � �. o
�,. n«� a Q 0
Type d pertwalor
� I� ❑ O!M►
GRQUTIHG IAATERtAL I
G,ouN,g nqt.,;d L;; i.. . 1� �^ ,_ iw l ho,n � �p � J
�
from b fl
:MARKS, SOURCE OF DATA, O1FFiCULT1ES tN SEALtHG I
� from b fl
� �, a n
UNSEALED WELLS ANO BQR{HGS
Other ur�akd wNl a borng on prop�ry/� ❑ Y�s No
UCENSED OR HEGISTERED CONTRACTOR T1pN
- This weN or bonng was seabd n accoidann wuh Mi�x�sWa Ruks. Chapt�r 3725. Tho
- tnN to Mts best ol my kno�vledgs. .
� � � H 58372
iE-0��3s4t
�«�. s�,,.�.
� ��
sa+ sea,.g wsw o. ew�g
�� above lan0
�
Am�ilar spaix initiaty 9row�d�
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ lMknb
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unkna
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unkno+
ANO BORE HOt�:
a�
❑ a.mowa
contaxied m tMs ropon is
or Aegrstador
-1b-
,
�
Descrip�ive Terminol�
� Designation p 2487'—$3
t
` Sksttdard Test Method far
�' CLASStEiGATiC►N O� SO!!S FOR ENGINEERlNG PURPO5�5
?• ',
a. sta.d w �h. mdreial pa.iig d» s» vs+a�►,iw�►.
4. i(bW sme�pb pMoin�i oobbfa and/ot bodd�i a!d'wMi obbMa uNd/�t bwidws' h gierp nu�►
.. G�nv.is wNh S Io 127C R�w rvipuin dral aynbsi�
Gw.r.,M ,�.a.g�a.d�.+,�,a�
� ����
� ����� •
J. Sa�dt wuh S b 1� Ae.s r«�. dod syn�iw4,.
SNi�SAi w+IFgiocGdtasdww�isiif
S1NGuC w�Age�.dsa�dwitMddy
SASi+I pw�rygrod.daondvra4�ilt
s0.sc D.«��.a,� � �o,•
.. c,•o.✓a» �*�.
.
r. i�law,idn.L�9z°,�ar�et«ja .vii,awa-r�..�.a�..
� S Aa�.s � w CI,�AI, w dud.xynibd GCGI.� 9CSI�A.
agoeta odd •w+ii� aga�iolCn.: s�.q►�
i, � r�«7 awoi�►;159G gwnl, add'wib yrwd" w giw� ��
} �E,�r.�� � � � a�,a �,.� r.. tu++t. �r�
L i..0 ar��aw IS ►r 297. ►Iw Nw 200, ad! wab a..d'.r'+ii� rywJ• wiki+r.r r pndewh�M.
R if s�ii a�we�t:30X piMa Nr. 20d. 9wd�wi�arF/�{. odd'saidit U 9+�►+w*w
�w. If x«i wu�aYrL307L plMa Nw 200. Vnd�wi'w1/8nn�1, od�"�nni1J' bgiwp �an+.
•. A,+LlaidpMsM�ra�+v�'11'C�.
w M e 4 rr plw b�lwr A' GM.
*. P�{i�0Y4MKObeW1 A �M,
q. 71 plor b�Mw'A' W�.
eo
°: sa
�c
w ,ip
Q
�
� �
�-
V
H
N �
�c
�
to
r
�
0
0
�o ib 2o so �co sa au To so 0o eoo :�o
uau�a w�ur {W�
LASORA70RY TE53'S
�fl Ory Oensity, pcf OC Ot�cnic Content, %
`,Nq w8r o��:sry, �f 5 Percent of Saturafian, b
MC Nalural Moisture Conhent, X SG SpaeificGraviy
i.t liquid limit, `Yo C Cahasian
?l Plasfic lrmit, 9'0 0 Angle oFlnterna! Friction
?I Plosticity Inde�c, o qu Unconfined Compressive Strcngtfi
0
PARTiCLE
Boulders...................
Cobbles ....................
Gravei
Coa�sa ..................
Fine......................
Sand
Coarsas ..................
Medsum .................
Fine ......................
Si(t...,. .......................
Clcy..........................
vary baxe .............
ioose .. ......».....
medium cienxa .......
dense...................
vaty dense ...........
CON515iEi+tCY
vary soft .,
sak ...
rather sa&
medrum .
1'CIi�7Cf S�t�
sti#F .. .. .
very stiff ..
E►ard ......,.
ORIWNG
S�ndcrd penetrctian testEx
3 1/A' ar 6 1I4' L0. (wtk
otherwisa. 1elfing wasat xrc
ta sampling anly where indi
. rteirationtestbbR»gst�a
�plitTu6e}. •
�qWld' Ctt�Qt �OCtilQS Wtts !
strain depNu cce inferted
co tha► wrroce and are, th
Power auger borings cre
Hnnd probings wete odv
diameter otn6e cntf aro !
�..�...,....,. ..� ...., r....,.. .. .
SA1NPl1NG�—Alt sampks are
•O.D. xplifi�uEra scraplsr, axcapt
thin�wall (undisturbedj sompW.
BP�--Numbets iadicote bbws
stcndard pen�h�afion tesi aiso 1
sampict is sei 6' ioto unciislutb+
auger: Oriving nxsisfiances are
tfiir�d a' incamants and odded
difFer significoalty. theY ate rep�
2/i 2 tw the sacand and third �
WH—WH indiearas tfie sampie
weight of lrammar and rods alo
NOT�E—Ati tests rvn in eccorda
standarcls.
IDENii�FiCATlON
_...... over 12"
....... 3" rc i 2"
�if d��"�iw
No. d—..3/a"
...... Na, d—No. 10
..,... No. ] 4--No. �0
...... No. 40--No. 200
...... No. 200--AOS mm
...... iess tlzan .005 cnm
DEiVSRY OP
�NCFSS 50tt5
...................... 0--4 BPF
.................... 5-10 BPf
.................. 11-30 8Pf
..................•31—SO BPF
.................. ...50+ BPF
CGHEStYE 50!!S
................ 0-1 BPF
................ 2--3 BP�
................ 4—S 8PF
................ b-8 BPF
.............. 9—i 2 6P�
............ 13—T � BPE
............ 1 T-30 9PF
.................. 3Q+ BPF
wtte advanced by
rt au�ars uniess notad
� 10 deQQ oUt GU�eY ptit7f
OCK6Q Dj/ #}1Q �tC�t7C ���
� �iY �i~ Oi b� dSQlilChlf;
Soii claxsificobon cnd
ittbecf samplas augered
oomewhct approwmate.
ed by the preint "8",
nnuaiiywith a 1 i/2'
3he cfapth from which tke
�. Hc�d probings are
en wilh t(te slcndcrci Y
ere »ated. TW indicctes
fOCYI'fQCOfC�4d Itl
vn as "N" vciue. i'he
�ii babw tha holbw-shsrri
eounted •`or second and
ai $PF Wheta tftey
� in the foibwirtg f�xm
icreme�ts, raspecfivaly.
�nefmted soil undu
�rsving aot required.
with applrcabfe ASiM
: 1 j �
I NTE R�'E�
To:
From:
Subject:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�� �
Planning Commission
August 22, 1995
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis tti� �
Questions on Antenna Pole - Case No. 95-21
DISCUSSION
This memoiandum is in response to questions from Commissioner
How tall is the City Water Tower?
The City Water Tower is appm�dmately one huadred ninety five feet (195')
How high are the e�stiag antenna panels on the City Water Tower?
The existing antenna panels, on the City Water Tower, are shown to be one
forly three feet (143') above ground level at the top of the antenna �panel. (]
attached diagram dated 12-8-93.)
When Mr. Olson approached the City Council in February, at what
antenna panels requested?
The attached diagram labeled 2-16-95 was submitted to the City in Febn�ary �
that Cellu]arONE, now known as AT&T Wireless, appearecl before City Co
request antenna location on the City Water Tower. "Alpha Sector" antenna
shown at a height proposed to be one huadred twenty feet (120') above grou
"Beta Sector" and "Gamma Sector" antenna panels are shown at a pmposed
one hundred feet (1Q0') above ground level.
�
were
the tinre
;il tA
�els are
level.
�ht of
(7) FACE
at71fTt1As � �'� � ��
Sff ORENTAA�ON�p�W� � ��'-0• AGL
11G1.
0
� ED'-0' A61
.,nwnu uLrA�lUn � 91T-0" IL4L
ER ELEVATION 100KiNG NORTN
t� raRnt
o�uu�noa � l`—f�:,�.�' !?� Aos�s. n
s
� �wto' �n �os �r
• aP xop�r":�'��
'{z �
r•
��
�, � ca�o ort�xr�ttoN = �t
�i� (COYPASS REApiNG a 339')
�
ORIENTATION PLA.N
TlNG INSTALLATION
e
() fAN1El lPD 7905/a 92' OIRECiIONAL
() E fl lP0 7905/b 97 DRECTIONAL
fANk7.� lPD 7905/8 92' ORECAQ�Ul.
S I�q1ANGL pONNitT
a�wrw uLVA1MJIi a S11T-� �IA,$.(.
TOWER ElEVATI.ON l.00KiNG NORTH
tx� Hoani �� u,� �s sr
• o�u�Tan
• iP ft79{f • A,�gA, �
M/ S IExfU1M.N. DOfWTLT
'1� F�+ �.,,
.
YAc�E11C pEc�,�1lU}pN '
FOR 7t�s S17E IS
FROY 7itliE
NORTH
FM IIAR�p�p
�1� � �i
DAIEa 4 �
PROPOSAL ORAWING
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
/u�� ' � � 4r
� � TX • 1IP`tE1GliT . �,1
lac
tx �
Rz Tx ��
Tz • � }' �
Tz � •
��,��,_ �� :
��.� �
,� �ORtfMATtOtI = 3(4'
• (�PASS RFaDWC =
i� � :b_ �
ORIENTATION PLAN
OPOS�D INSTA�LL_ATIO
FEA�. FS7AL'
���
12-8-93
�� �
�IFNDOTPR
stn: � aF 1
�5�34• �I!:�'r'i:�l���:`Y>>9 �� � � i� S:�J:^�'�� •`,y„ �+. .. • \. . � 1.•�'•r: �if'� 'ti1i' ti.tiYl:." _ ��� , • • .
. . ::�li .. . . . ��1't�::.i.� �i �... .. ..�y.. �.j.�' � � . ���: 1 {1^:���..:.� . �� .
. . . .u� 1�' . .:�� •��:"�: u''�•:�'v . . .. .. ,'� �?� t:� :�� •^+'�r'�S'•'•'.��w�. EP•
. . . . "�•-.��+.r'�'. �'�:'+{_,�....: ti :::.:.. �_ . i::•� . . _. .... .. .._
� M•�
�
A� YO�lRJ1ED I TIP FAQ�-0" A.C.I.
SEE �ENiATtpH PW7 FqFt rl3llfiFSS
#JLtR w 00'-C A.GL
I
A2iRti}6
( i� I I�,� �#�/ _ �A A A[�I A A I i sBwttLt Ei�vA7loN = YtT—� 1�t
70WER ELEVATION LpOKING NORTH
oRmrrA � 1� % ��'� �ua
Df�G71RlAL �
! iP }�iQft • -o'+
� �z• � n
! if iEtCFit � Y�CL![�ED
� `" t� CRlDifA'AOtt m 3Rt
+►�d,.. (�PA55 READWG = 33?)
. . ORtfHiAT(dN PLAN
EXISTiN� 1NSTALLATIO��N
, W1T Sr M�iC
�
AtJl: CJL
�
ALPFiA SF.CfC7R
(2) DH PRODLfGT'S PDI01'f7
ANT'FN2tAS MOUt�IIID � C1L HQGFif =120'
BETA SECIi�R
{2} I3B pRpDt3C7S YD 10277
ANTENNAS MOUNhD @ GL FiE1GHT.lOp'
dAMMA SEC'f'OR
(2) DB PRODi.1G?S PD 10200
ANYENNAS MOISNIID Q C1L HE3C��i'=lOp'
COAX G1BLE TC? RUN DC}WN LAt3DER
t�iASBINSII}E 1'OP7F1i. i2�]+i tJPII7FR
QROLIIVD'!1D C�ILULAR ONE
I.EASED EQUIPMFN!' SPACE
TOWER ELEVATION LOOKING NORTH
t� rtos�tt +�o�u�,+�.�o
ORIExtA'11oN a� as r,ea,ucrs r� �aaoo u-
nmernowa,�xmaus xovrrt�p
► i • cn. �aar.iar �.os,.
�E'YA S6CT'OR � ff0
q) Df !AO{SUCiS TD IOIT! M
tlalGCf70MA�1.AttIEHtUS NOUM
• OL I�Ci$hfOP A.6.L. ^�
YACHE?!C DEpJNA'ilOtt
FOR 'itlSS StTE SS
S
FRo►t TRUE
NOR7t!
FM MARKIN'
JtS Pf ,+� C DET.�
ft—AGl.-5059�-4E
DA7EDs 4 !i
Dt�t�^'1CAf i1CAWtRiI:
, « .... �S
etrtua.c�vu �w
m ns rieocucrx ��om ar
nmt�cnotuLn2tiFraus xotnrx�a
• cn. �oar.�iv,�os.
�
d�D 4IiffMAi�N = 3t�t
(COYPILSS READIHG x 33S)
8RIENTATiON PLAN ,
P R 0 P 0 S E Q 1 N S�T A L!. A T 1 0 N-
��n�r +n rn��♦
,�a
14t'<)::i'�tF i°: i�
CQI�SI.iL'fl!`C; I'1_AN'�L•1:S
LA!�L7S[_r�;�1: A1:C:Ii1TEC�'�:
;it)t) F�(iSi- A<`ENtJE i�0123'(i
5U1TE 210
MINNEAPnLIS, MN ;;-li11
(ii2•3.iy� i.it}tt
PLAN'NIlVCX REPORT
DATE:
CASE NO:
APPLICANT:
LAND 4WNH:R:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PREPARED BY:
P�AN3�TIItiTG CONSiDERA1`IONS
Background.
August 22, 1995
95-21
AT&T Wireless Services
1V�innesota Department of
1196 Northland Drive
Conditional Use Permit for a Ce
Telephone Transmission Tower,
far Tower Height and Variance �
Setback
C. 7ohn Uban
AT&T Wireless has constructed a celtutar telephone tower 12S feei tall on a piec� of surplu
right of•way at the intersection of State H'ighway SS and Interstate 494. The parce
Industrial and is adjacent to vacant Iand in United Properties' Northiand Park. Both
Refinery and NSP have pipe lines on the site. In the Industriat Zane, t��nsmission to�
Canditianal Use and height is Iimited to 4S feet plus S4 percent far specific structures li
4rclinance. Transmission towers are not covered in the SO gercent rule in the ord'uu
previous AT&T tower const�ucted`close to I 35E and H"ighway 13 was approved at 75 :
The subject tawer was built on MnUOT properiy wiih the assumption by AT&T that ca;
on MnDOT properiy did not nced City approval. Although the tower facility is not ogea
is nearly complete and can be viewed by the Planning Comn�ission members. In e
repr�tatives of AT&T approached the Ciiy Counat for pernussion to use #he City water
iheir antenna site. The City Gounci! informed them that the tower was under consh�;
sununer. That constructian is naw complete.
Additional documents and correspondence &om the City are included for your review, n
Building
MnUOT
is zoned
the Koch
►ers are a
ted in the
3ce. The
zat, it
1995
:r for
i this
a
August 22, 1995 Case 95-21 Page 2
letter from Kevin Batchelder informing the applicant that their application was incomplete. The City
has continued the review process and public hearing notice has been published and mailed regarding
this application.
Conditional Use Permit for Cellular Telephone Transmission Tower.
The City ofMendota Heights has approved a similar facility for Cellular One (now AT&T Wireless)
at 80080 Sibley Memorial I�ighway. This was placed within the Riverwood Business Park along
I�'ighway 13 on the back lo� The tower was installed to improve cellular coverage and increase
system capacity. 1'he approval given to Cellulaz One offers some guidelines to the City on how to
view future installations. Although the subject tower has already been built its location and design
can be compared to the previous tower facility.
AT&T in the lease agre�ment with MnDOT has agreed to relocate the proposed tower facility if final
approval is not reached. This facility has yet to receive final Federal approval. Obviously, the City
of Mendota. Heights has not gcven its approval eithex The important attn'butes to remember with the
Rivetwood Place Business Park facility is that it was located in a rolling .terrain setting similar to the
proposed facility. It also is seiving highway traflic on I 35E and State H'ighway 13. These
similarities show that a like facility would provide ample service comparable to the proposed new
location at H'ighway 55 and I-494. The approved cellular tower is a monopole of 75 feet in height
with a brick equipment bu�ding, paved access road, 75 foot setback to properiy lines (height of pole),
and landscaping and berming to screen the facility.
Important in the review of the Conditional Use Permit for a cellular tower is the view of the tower
&om adjacent roads, businesses, and residential areas. The applicant has provided two .photographs
showing the visi'b�ity of the near tower from the Interstate. These photos include the relationship to
highway lights, which are located the Interstate corridor at elevations varying between 100 and 120
feet in height, No views were shown from I�'ighway 55 or Northland Drive, which has the more
immediate view of the proposed tower facility. � "
A photo of a building similar to the existing equipment building was included, but no additional
architectural details were submitted. A landscape sketch was submitted showing five pine trees and
twelve dogwoods to be placed on two sides of the facility. Also an access road was shown with a
turn azound abutting the properly line to the east. The proposed road has crushed rock rather than
pavement.
The condition of the site is complicated by the fact that it is surplus Interstate right-of-way and
technically is a large parcel within the Interstate system For purposes of determining appropriate
setbacks and developing �a review of the facility, we are assuming that the fence line demarking the
right-of way is the practicable limit of the interstate system. The use of this excess property is not
for Interstate purposes. It contains a portion of Northland Drive, an NSP valve statioq and two gas
lines as well as a tempora�y scavenging station for the Koch Refinery with three monitoring wells on
the site. The Koch jet fuel line runs diagonally through the prop�t.y. There are additional monitoring
wells in the Soo Line Railroad right-of-way to the east as well as a telecommunica.tions fiber optic
line. The Soo Line right-of-way is about 100 feet wide and abuts -H'ighway 55. Although detailed
�#rgust 22, .1995 �ase 95-21 � Page 3�
easement inforcnation was not given far the prapenty, it appears that NSP and K�
extensive easement rights ta the subject parcel. This may limit how the property
be used.
have
The property sets approximately 30 feet above the interstate and is directly adja�ent to future
development ofthe United Properiies industrial park to #he t�est� The site is alsa ide fified through
the I�ighway 55 Corridor Planning effort as a gateway to the City and is highly visible t people using
H'ighway SS and Northia.nd Drive.
The United Property Iand ta the west is woaded which appears to give some natur�
screening ta the tawer �acility.. However, when t.tns area is fully developed many of tlie
will most iikety be removed. There are a couple of cottonwoods an the subject
ad�itianal cottonwaods and elms on the Soo Iane gropert.y, Neither elms nor cottoriwa{
as desired trees in the. City I.andscape Ordinance. The survey supplied by the applica�
two trees on the subject properiy.
The surplus is appro�rimately 1�f� acre in size and the tower facility is tocated on an
by 44 feet ar appraximately 3/100 of an acre.
background
xislang trees
�roperiy and
is are listed
; shows only
pad 34
Generally, a good location far communication towers and other utilitarian facilities is within an
indus�tarrial area. out of view of the public and residents of ihe area. The subject pmp rty is zoned
�ndus�rial, but occupies a highly visi'ble site at the edge of the Indushial District. Becaus of this high
degree ofvist'b�ity, a Canditianai Use Pernut pr�ocess shouid entaii cxireful review 4f the esign of the
bu�din� the height of the struc�ure� setbacks, and screening, and other itssues that may elp mitigate
the negative impacts and review oth�r Ioca�ions that ma.y be more appropriate for #his e of facitit.y.
The review o£this applic�tion is oomplicat,ed by the fact that the tower has already been ed and
reasonable choices #hat would have been made prior to u�stallarion may not be easily dressed.
s���
The applicant has submitted documentation as to the heaith and safe#y issues invo2ving
u�t,erferenc� radiatio� and tower failure. It shauld be noted that this facility was built
inspections and to con6�rm the safety issues, the City would have to review inspectian
outside source or a new inspec�ion made of the faality using extraardinary means ta test
foatings and reinforcement.
_ ��
These cellular sites typically creat�e very little traffic as indicated by the applicant.
access to Northland Drive is approximately 135 feet from H'ighway SS.
Access
The plan shows a turn around and garldng area adjacent to the �astern property tine. This
to the Soo Line right-af-way which altows for a zera setback to loading if it is a railra
facility. This is nat a railroad loading facility and so a 30 foat setbaak to stiuctures ant
s�tback for paiiang and acoess drive is required. Instead of requiring a variance for this tu
I suggest t�hat it be moved ta the west side of the drive thus eIiminating the need for a vE
providing a.greater oppartunity for more landscaping along the eastern perimeter ofthe
hout City
� fram an
adequate
driveway
� adjacent
d loading
a 10 foot
�-araund,
iance and
1i'P . -
August 22, 1995 Case 95-21 Page 4�
Comprehertsive Plan
Tlie Comprehensive Plan designates this site and Northland Park as Industrial. This axea has been
looked at through the H'ighway 55 Comdor Study. The corridor study anticipated office
headquarters along I-494 and it has been held as prime vacant land with Interstate visibility by United
Properties for a high quality development. This area, specifically at I�'ighway S5, is designated in �the
Corridor Study as one of the gateways to the Ciry. Because of the aesthetic sensitivity of this area
to future development and the overall character of the City, this tall structure should be designed to
a higher aesthetic standard than has been proposed. The general welfare of the community
incotporates development of aesthetic guidelines which are applicable in all zoning districts and are
a significant part of the review of a Conditional Use Permit.
Driveway
In reviewing the aesthetic portion of the Conditional Use Permit, the previously approved tower sets
a comparable standard. Because the subject site is more visible, and in a City gateway loca.tion,
additional screening and aesthetic mitigafion should be required for this site. The access road is
proposed to be gravel adjacent to future high quality corporate facilities. The previous site was in
a similar setting and received a paved driveway built to City standards.
Building
The building as proposed is a concrete aggregate box without any architectural detailing. The
previously approved equipmer�t building had a sloping roof to match surrounding structures as well
as brick f�c�de on all four sides. Sim�ar stiuctures ha.ve been built throughout the metropolitan area.
with diffeaem communities requiring arctntedurally aesthetic treatment to communication equipment
bu�dings. � In ttus gateway setting such a treatment would be consistent with past City approvals. The
applicant has not proposed any new building design.
Screening
The proposed landscape plan shows some screening of the facility using evergreen plant material.
Three evergreen trees are proposed next to the stcudune on the south side adjacent to I-494, and two
others placed next to the Soo Line right-of-way. Additionally, 12 shrubs are shown adjacent to the
building and at the base of the tower inside the fenced area. Because the location is so close to the
Interstate and I�ighway S5, the view of this facility needs to be blended into a more natural setting
on land under the control of the applicant and MnDOT. I suggest a significant amount of landscaping
and screening be applied around all sides of the stivcture as well as along the Interstate edge and
along Soo Line right-of-way. Because of the proposed height of the stcvcture the initial plantings
should also reflect an additional height beyond that which is required in the Ordinance. The structure
as proposed is approximately three times the height allowed in the Ordinance and the plantings should
be evergreens three times taller than what is required. If the structure is proposed to be.shorter
(twice as tall) then the plantings could be of lesser height.
MnDOT has proposed extensive landscaping along I�'ighway 110 and I�'ighway SS in conjunction with
the newly conshucted highway alignment to I�'ighway 13 and the Mendota Bridge. These plans have
not been submitted for City review and because this facility is on MnDOT properly, we would
anticipate that additional gateway landscaping can be included in other right-of-way areas to help
mitigate the installed tower fac�lity. Additionally, MnDOT should provide an overall Landscape Plan
�i�rgust 22, 1995 Case 95-21
for ttus entire parcel and a maintenance program far alI lantlsscaping. Ba�use this is a ga
and future develapment will take place ta the west, the long term maintena.nce and att�
thi"s site is criticat. Additiana�ty, many of the tree piantings may nat survive if there i;
the site to provide irrigation. Aiso, ti►e ptantings shauld be guaranteed throughout 1
structure and repiacement required if any piants are damaged due to other activity on
I beiieve a revised Lartdscape Plan addressing these issues needs to be submitted far
Manopale
The propose�ci tawer is 125 feet ta11 and has an appearance s`unilar to the tower iights
The tower Iights are placed in the interchange af I 35E and I-�94 for efficient Iightin
height varying from 100 to I20 feet. The antenna tower is placed on right-af-way appr
feet abave the Interstate system and is larger in diameter with an. antenna cluster at �
towex has been painted to match the Iight fixtures an the interstate. .
Tower aesthetics vary fram cornmunity to community. The City appraved the last a�
speafic color to match the City's water tawer. Also opdons ofmaldng towers look like
such as trees, or unique gateway £eatures have been accepted in other comrnunities. 7
fully integrating this facility into an attractive gataway feature has not be,�n given to
reviewing this application, the Planning Cammission may wish to address what the Ci�
to have as a gateway entrance for this part of the City.
a►veral�, there is a great deal of diff'erence betwe�n the previously apgroved antenria
the one befor$ the City today.
Setback Variance,
Page S�
�way fa.cility
�ctiveness of
no water an
ie Iife of the
:he site. �
ong I-494.
and have a
�mately 30
� top. The
Setback vanances are complicated on this site because technically the staie right-of-waY s�
interconnected as one large parcel, However, this parcel is a surplus remanent #hat was
v�rh�e �ng the Irnerstate atignmern. It is sega�aied fram'the I�Zghway SS right-of-way t
of Soo Line Raitroad right-of-way. Its loc�tion is direc�ty adjac�i to United Properties de�
Under norn�ai conditions suiplus right-of-way is purchased by private enterprise and assei
adja�:�t parcels. T�us parcel has nat been assembi�ed because it is encumbered with seven
and is gaing through an environmentat clean-up af the jet fuel pipetine sp'�it. The site p
right-of-way function far the Interstate but does have an easement far Northiand Drive
northern portion of the site. Because the site does nat hotd a use far the Interstate itsE
c�raina�g�, stopey, embankment, requit�d width, lightin� or enviranmental mitigadan, it is be
as a separate parcet with distinc� properfy tines on ait sides for purposes of this review. Th
edge is the fence line for the right-of-way which is in most other cases is concurrent with tY
way property tine.
The setback far a structure in the Industrial District is 30 feet from an interior praperiy l
feet frorn a right-of-way Iine, The building is only approximately 15 feet from the Inter.
AlI other structures along the Interstate are required to be at least 40 feet b�ack and plac
bu�ding witfun 15 feet is inconsistent with other structures in Meadota Heights, If this Si1
be�n reviewed priar to cunstxuctioq the opportunity for placing the building on the north
tower may have avoided the need for a variance for structure setback.
na� with a
�r objects
optian of
; City. In
rould like
and
1S �
i00 feet
�leci with
pipelines
�vides na
cross the
y SUC�'18S
g treated
southern
right-of-
ie and 44
�te fence.
nent of a
Plan had
de of the
August 22, 1995 Case 95-21 Page 6.
The applicant may argue that both the Interstate and this remnant property are ovsmed by the State �
and that no real property line exists. Because this parcel does not function as right-of-way, I believe
it i"s reasonable to interpret the proposed building as requiring a Setback Variance.
The City Ordinance does not specifically provide for a setback when structures exceed the allowed
maximum height. The structures that have a potential for exceeding that limit are included in the
Conditional Use Permit process so that appropriate setbacks can be determined. Once again when
looking at the previously approved antenna site, the setbacks approved by the City for the tower itself
was the same as the height of the tower. A 70 foot high tower required in a 75 foot setback to all
property lines. The reason being the taller the structure, the greater the setback to provide
appropriate spacing to adjacent properties to allow for mitigating landscaping, and for avoidance of
potential injury or damage from the collapse of the pole. For these reasons an appropriate setback
for a 125 foot tower would be 125 feet from the properiy lines. This tower does not meet that
criteria on three sides. The only hardship for the location of the building and tower in the proposed
plan is that the facility is already built. The Planning Commission may wish to explore with the
applicant what additional landscaping or aesthetic treatment can be accomplished to help nir�mi�e
the impacts of the present location.
Height Variance.
The applicant is requesting an 80 foot variance from the 45 foot maximum height in the Industrial
Zone to allow the 125 foot structure. The previous tower was conshucted at a 75 foot height in an
area of rolling teirain which was ample for Cellular One to serve Mendota Heights and surrounding
areas. The applicant has suggested in their narrative that through new techniques of aiming antennas
and controlling the energy output of the transmissioq that each tower can be tuned to the territory
that it is serving. The nanative mentioned a range of 75 to 125 feet and the present proposal chooses
the maximum height in their performance range. It is quite possible that a 75 foot height would be
adequate in this location and information showing why it cannot operate as the previous tower�did
has not been included in the applicant's narradve. In fact, the general trend in building a
communications system within an urbanized area is to infill with shorter towers. As the service area
b.ecomes more dense, smaller cellular sites are created using smaller towers with more frequent
placement. It is not apparent why a tower taller than 75 feet is required in this location, especially
when it sets approximately 30 feet above the Interstate system.
The cellular telephone system does require a•line of site relationship generally to its service area.
Through advanced techniques, this relationship can be enhanced to provide adequate service to the
area. A tower taller than 45 feet is certainly necessary at this time to provide cellular telephone
service in the metropolitan area. In the more densely populated areas and close to downtown
1Vi'umeapolis and St Paul, building tops have been appropriate for antenna locations. It is reasonable
to expect that Mendota Heights would require a tower taller than existing buildings in the area, but
not necessarily taller than previous towers erected in the City for the same purpose. There is a SO
foot difference between 75 feet and 125 feet, which needs to be justified by the applicant prior to
developing the specific rational for the requested variance.
Action.
Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council. The Planning Commission
may also continue the item if they find the application is not complete and request additional
inforn�atioa The applicant has been notified that this is possible and that a 60 day extension can be
m
August 22, 1995 Cczse 95-21
requested by the Planning Cammission.
Considerations.
For the Candifianat Use Pernut the fotlowing are considerations that may be
appropriate by the Planning Commission:
1. Access should be paved.
2. Tumaround requires a 1Q foot setback frorn the properiy line.
3. Building should have a slaped roof and brick facade.
4. Tower to be 15 feet in height,
5. Tower to be painted to match water tower or other reco�unendatian of the City.
fi, Tower to have appragriate gateway elements attached at the discretion ofthe
1, Landscape plan ta be revise� to ir►clude fizll perime�er evergreen plantings at tF
required height.
8. Additional gateway treatment on the MnDOT right-of way.
� 9. A full life time maintenance and watering program &am both the applirant and 1�
10. A landscape easement from MnDOT for the perpetuation of all planted material.
11. I.andscape Plan to inciude the entire parcel.
12. Ln leu of the City construction inspection, AT&T ariti MnDOT guarantee the
against harm.
13. or the facility be recanshucted in a more appropriate iocatian.
„
Page 7'
i if deemed
�[��"�'�sT
: and City
CITY �F MENDOTA HEIGHTS� � �
��Case No. J5-21 ���
� �
NORTH '�°' �
• scus: i--zoo� �:�.:s�a7O1"01
1.�►�l 1�
August 4, 1995
Mr. Ted Olson
AT&T Wireless Services
Suite 301, 7900 Xences Avenue 5outh
Bloomington, MN 55431
Dear Mr. OLson:
.
1'
,�"V�iendota Hei
This letter is to serve as notificatiori that we have received pour applicatioa for a
Use Peimit for a Telephone Tiansmission Tower and Equipment Building. ��Tbds
al.so includes a request for Variances for Tower Height and Setback.
Please be notified that the application is considerad inoomplete at this time due to its
architectural. elevations and a deta��d landscaPiag Plan. This application is being pl;
the Planning Commission's agenda for their meeting on August 22, 1995 despite the
incomplexe application and published notice has bee� sent to our offi�ial newspaper,
SouthWest Review.
As I discussed with Mr. Max Thompson, photographs of the equipmeut building we
submi�ted ia lieu of u�itectural elevations. These photographs, aad a laadscape p1
received in my office on August 3,1995 aad it w�l be up to the Planning Commissi
August 22,1995 me�ing, to deteimiae if this ir�foz�mation oompletes the application
requirements of the Zoniag Ordinaaoe. The Pla�nning Commission also reserves the
request additional infonmation, ��iniher details of infonmation sabmitied, in order �
a complete review of the requested Conditional Use Permit and Variances.
We understand that there were tight time deadlines for the oomplete submission of pai
application following our meeting with John iJban, City Planning Consultaat, on 7�tlp
1995. We appre�iate your efforts to submit all the required materials. Should you ha
questions, or conoerns, please cont�d me at 452-1850.
Siacerely,
��-r3����---
Kevin Batchelder
Administrafrve Assistant
cc: Max Thompson, AT&T Wireless
Peter Beck, Attorney
� 0�
hts
: of
on
were
at�their
i�:
1101 Victoria Curve •1Kendota �Heights,lVlN � 55118_ �452�1850 �
��
. _..��
- � � � � i�y o�r
. A
, ... j,�.,, ��ienda�a Hei�,�,.ts
�_ ~� , -
�
� APPLiCATION FCyR CONSIDERA.TION
OF
PLANNIlYG REQUEST
Applicant Name:
Case Na. '�` � �
Date of Application - i �
' Fee Paid —
AT&T Wireless � Services � . "� ��21-16 0 .S `�
{i.�st3 tF'�) t�
Address� 2515 24th Avenu� South, Minneapcilis, MN 55406-1218
(Number & Sacet) (C�tY) (��) (��?
OwnerName•Minnesata Depar�ment o� Transportation
� ti.ast) (F'�) (�
A��. M8 6 Room 509 395 John Ireland B1vd., St. Paul, MN 55155
� (Numbsr & Street} {C�tyj - (State) {zip}
StreetLocationofPmpcxtqinQuation: 1i96 Northlana Drive, Mendota
Lcgat,De�ription,�f'pmperty; See. Attached
Type of Reque�t:
��g
x Conditianat usc Permit �� ,C�C�
Ct�ndifioaal Use Pezmit far P.0 D.
Plan Ap�mvaZ
Compr+chcnsive Plan Amendrnent
't - `
a- X ���a ac�,.�
Subdivisian Approval
�. R%tlan�ts Permit .
{�r (attach explanation�
Applicable C�t.y Ordinance Number Sectian
Preser�tZZa�iyagaf•PmpecE� � FresentUse NSP Va2ve Station & Koeh Refinery, Term.
�����g���� I ���U� Essential Services Structure
i---�---� ..
Y�3CI�t (1� It1S1 !l� �CIIZS �C la �tiS. Ii�t�12CSL itBt� {�1 i22C 8ti�t�lOII$Z
������� " ' Far AT&T Wire ess Services
(Signature � Applic�ut) _
August 1, 1995
c�i .
(Reaeived�by-'Iitle) '' " -
1101 Victoria Curve •1Viendota Heights, .l�iN;r�55118:������'�`:452-1850
T •
. . • . • : • • • �' _rt : . � ; . .
-- .._. ... __�_ � " � .1 ` � . .
. LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SUBJECT. MNDOT PARCEL: �
That part of ihe South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Sectioti• 34,' .
Township 28 No�th. Range 23 West. Oakota Couniy, Minnesota� des�ri6 d •
as foliows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast ;
Quarter of the Southeast Quarter .of said Section 34; ttie�ce NorEh1 '..�
� �19° 45' 00" West 700 feet; thence East and pacaqel with the Scu#h • -�
line of said Section 34 a distance of 62 feet to the Westerfy line :of •.
the Chicago, Milwoukee, St Paul and Pac�c Raiirocd Company's right � .
of way; thence South 30° 48' OOr'. Ecst ato�g said right of way 7f7 •• .
feet to the South line of said Section 34; thence West along the tSo. .
line of scid Sectiqn 34 a distance of 27 7.4 feet to � the point of . �� - ��
beginning; excepting #he right of way of Tn�nk Hiqhway No. 494 a� n w
located and established. . - ' :
Being Part of MNDOT Right—of—way Plat No. 19-33. •�
� "" � � �- - ..� � � . . . � �----- - . . , `. , .
. . � . . . . . . . . _ . . .. • . . . • - ��_ �:; - -
.. . . . - - -.. � . .. - . . .:��":�:�_._: �- . .
. . . .. . � '.��' :.�~ � . " .
a
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
NOTICE OF HEARING
August 2, 1995
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of Mendota Heights will
meet at 8:45 o'clock P.M., or as soon as possible thereafter, on Tuesday, August 22,
1995, i� the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 �ctoria Curve, Mendota Heights,
Minnesota, to consider an application from AT&T Wireless Services for a Conditional
Use Permit for a telephone transition tower .and height and setback variances on the
following described property:
That part of the S 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 34, Township 28, Range 23,
Dakota County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning .at the SW corner
of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 34; thence North 19 degrees
45'00" West 700 feet; thence East and parallel with the South line of said
Section 34 a distance of 62 feet to the Westerly line of the Chicago,
Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacfic Railroad Company's right-of-way; thence South
30 degrees 48'00" East along said right-of-way 767 feet to the South line of
said Section 34; thence West along the South line of said Section 34 a
distance of 217.4 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPTING the right-of-way
of Trunk Highway No. 494 as now located and established; and ALSO EXCEPT
that party lying North of Northland Drive, AND ALSO EXCEPT that part lying
South of the fence line:
y
More particularly, this property is located at 1196 Northland Drive.
This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Zoning Ordinance No. 401.
Such persons as desire to be heard with reference. to the request for the Conditional
Use Permit and Variances will be heard at this meeting.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 120
hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of
Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this
may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administrator at 452-
1850.
Cellular Division
August 1, 1995
Planning Commission, Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Ciry of Meadota. Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
RE: Variance,and Conditional Use PernutApplication
Essential Services Structure
Highways SS & 494
Honorable Mayor, Commissioners, and Council Members:
s�2
FAX
This letter �ccompanies an application for height variance and a Conditional Use
construct aa essential services structure� and equipment shelter on property owned by the
Department of Transportation (MnDOT�.
The req�est is being made ia die name of AT&T Wireless Services. MnDOT has can.sented
application and is in the final approval stages of a lease agree�neat with the applicant for a p�
property located on the NW intersecfion of highways 55 and 494. Doaunents nequired by d
e
Mendota Heights Zoning Ordinance ('iacluding dra.wings and surveys of the pmperty) acco�
letter. ..
The Proposed Use.
The sit� would be used by AT&T Wireless Services, one of only two companies
lioensed by the Federal Commuiucations Commission (FCCj to provide essential cellular
services to the Twin Cities. The proposed project would inclaiie a steel monopole with an
to it and an equipment building (located at ti�e base of the pole) to accommodate vellular r
The proposed location is at the south east corner of a plot on MnDOT Right of W
abandoned railroad tracks, adjacent to an NSP valve station, and a jet fuel scavenging fac
Koch Refinery. This specific site was chosen based on the following criteria:
Wireless Serv;ces
24th Avenue South
:apolis, MN 55406
�2i-isso
312 721-4770
• AT&T Wireless Services' customer �needs ... de5ned in terms of poor quality and lov�
• Non-interfering existittg users oa the property (see attached letters of approval from e
• Natural sc�ening afforded by many mature trees west of the site
• Aa existing "clearing" which will allow us to pre,serve all of the major trees at the site
The proposed site will be contaiaed within a 34' x 44' area.. We normally restrict
of the monopole and the building with a chain link fenoe (as �quimd by die City). Lands
provided according to City ord'wances and MnDOT's requests. A site plan and drawings
project accompany thi,s applicatioa
� Recyded Paper
�
this
ion of their
City of
�any this
have been
.as attached
equipment
used by
users)
to the base
will be
proposed
Fssential Services Structure
Highways 55 & 494
Page 2 .
The Monopole.
The proposed monopole will provid� support for oellular ant�nnas and r�lated cabling ('u�side the
pole) necessary to connect the antennas to radio equipment inside the shelter. The pole is constructed of
steel, is completely self-supporting, and will be painted dark brown to blend with existing surrounding
lughway light poles and trees in the adjacent fi+eeway interchanges. .
The pole is enginee�+ed to be 125 feet tall, and is consistent in height with the suriounding highway
light poles (wluch are 104 to 128 feet tall).
It will be engineered and manufactumd by Valmont Industries, Inc. of Valley, Nebraslca. A letter
from Valmont is attached to this application detailing the rigid engineering and safety standards to which
this monopole will be constivcred. We will provide additional engine�ring data as required.
Equipment Building.
The proposed equipment building is 12' wide, 28' long, and 11' high. The exterior finish will be
exposed aggregate. This shelter was installed at the College of St Catherine's in SL Paul for six (� years,
•-� and was approved by them as meeting their requi�ments for aesthetics.
The bwlding will house radio, computer, and climate control equipment for this site. The
equipmeat is powered by NSP (using norma1120 / 240 volt, single phase, AC electricity). It will be
conaected to AT&T Wireless Service.s' mobile switching oenter via traditional telephone lines. No water .
or.plumbing is brought to any of our 80 sites across the state�, sinve no people are present at our sites on a
daily basis. Zhere will only be occasional, brief visits (average of about once a month, for 1 to 3 hours per
visit) for mutiae maintenancer Fire protection is prnvided by OSHA approved Halon inside the shelter
(this is the same type of Sre pmtection installed in most airplanes in aur nation). Equipment inside the
building produces no noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odor. -..
Antennas.
Antennas attacched to the monopole will transmit and receive FOGappmved radio signals which -
carry voice and data between the cellular syste,m users and AT&T Wireless Services' central switch The
physical size of the antennas will depend on capacity and quality needs of our users, as type and
maaufac�r a�+e determined by our radio engineers for optimum servioe to this anea.
�� � The area in which cellular cover"age is n� largely defines antenna height required to provids the
needed quality and capacity as our system matures. Naturally, surrounding topography, t�es and
buildings also play aa important mle ia arriving at appropriate antennas. AT&T Wireless Services'
engineers have deterRuned that antenna height necessary for improving currendy unacceptable user quality
and capacity at this location,�acy between 75 and 125 feet, based on antenna directioa and "same-channel
inte,�ference" bet�ween this and our own neighboring sites .(at the Int�ernational Airport, Maplewood, Inver
Grove Heights, Eagan, and Mendota. Heights).
Fssential Services Structure
Highways 55 & 494
Page 3
The Cellular Phone System.
Users of cellular telephone serv�ic:e include members af the business community as
pablic sectar. Comme�ters, doctors, saiesgeopie, bt�siness awners and execudves all bene
cellular phones. Additionally, cellular telephones are used extensively by fi�, police, and
safety offcicials and deparemmenrs. .'I1�e system allows police and others tA canduct discr�et <
in the field, and enables dir�ct communicatian with individuals in neeci of assistance even �
traditional telephone is unavailable.
Cellular phone users can conta�ct "911" to r�port accidents, fires, ar other emer�
having to sear�h for a teiephane Mr. James R Beutelspacher, 9-1-i Project htanager
wrote that "the unimpeded growth of cellular service is an unpartant adjunct to 9-1-1 e�
regarting." His letter is attached for yowr information.
Cellular is a low pawer sys�tem. The amount of energy generatsd from a single
channel is typically abaut the same as a 100 watt light bu2b. Tiiis is %ss energy than is
typical cordless telephane which is used in many hames today.
The Question of Interf'erence.
Tl�e cellulaz phone system operates on a specific set of channels livensed exclusivel
Wireless Sean►ices by the Federal Commwucations Commission for provisn.an of high quali
service, for t� benefit af the public goad. 1i� fiit�ering of spunious signals is very tighdy �
standard radio electronic filteis. C.�llular telepho�es operate within a st�ictly �gulated set c
&�equencies between 825 and $�S megahertz {�v¢Iz} far transmit and betareen 8�U and 890
rec�ive. AT&T Wn�eless Searvices is curnendy licenseci to operate in aver 1Q0 major marke
with hundreds of antennas. There has not be�n any instance of television or radia int�:rf�e�e
e
All AT&T Wirel�ss Se,�vices sites must be operated in accordance with aur FCC lic
cellular service in this a�a. Mr. Albent S. Jarratt, 7r., Engi.ne�r in Charge af the S� Faul F
Field Operations Bureau of the F(:C confumed that the FCC ��;as not reoeived any complau
interferenc�e by cellular phane t�ansmissians with home electronic ent�rtainment eqcupment
five states in which Mr. Jamatt's ai�ice has jurisdiction His letter is enclased far your infc
The Cellular Grid.
;ll as the
by using
zer public
;s without �irst
�innesota,
��y
],ar phone
rated by the
to AT&T
� mobile
Nntrolled via
allotted
+gIz for .
inationwide
ae reported
tn gmvide .
ld Office,
of
anv of the
Cellular .�ervioe provides subscribers with highly portable phane servioe by develop' g a grid of
radia cells arranged in a geograghically hexagonat pattern. F.ach "oell" is creat,eid by an which serve
as �e Iink betweea the custama and the system while the customer is within that particuiar ,As
callers move from one cell ta the next, their ca�lls are autamatically switched, or "handed off,' to the ne�
t�ll's an�enna site based on the str�ngth of �he signai between the mobi2e and tha oelL
Each cell caa only handle a finite number of c��Ls at any one time. As the number af
incre�,ses, the grid must be grown to handle the incr�easing number of calls. This usually me�
cells must be createti within ihe same geographic area, resulting in a new grid gat�ern of sma
need for better cellular qualily and more calling capacity is now need�d by our growing subs
this locatian Accomganying this letter is a booklet that more thoroughly exglains the cellul<
�s that more
er cells. Tius
riber base in
system.
Essential Services Structure
Highways 55 & 494
Page 4
While the area in which cellular coverage is needed largely deiines the required antenna. height,
topography also plays a role in arriving at the appropriate height for the tower. Thi.s is true because
cellular telephone signals cannot travel through large structures or through the earth.
One of the keys to cellular engineering is to take care to design each oell to be the proper size. If a
cell is too large, it will interfere with the operation of neighhoring cells, and callers will hear other
conversations or "cross-talk." ff a oell is too small, some areas between cells will be left without any
service,and callers will not be able to use their phones. If a caller is in a valley or if a hill lies b.etween the
caller and the cell's antenna, the area acts as if there is no antenna at all. When topography comes into
play, cellular telephone service can be both difficult to provide and frustrating to use.
Cellular engineers now employ the use of direcdonal antennas in an effort to accommodate the
topography and surrounding structures. By increasing / d�creasing the elevation of the antennas and tilting
the antennas up or down, the cellular signal is "controlled" to cover hill tops and valleys without increasing
the cell's overall sitie. Indeed, this technology will be employed at this particular site.
The CUP.
Section 19.2(3) of the City Zoning Ordinance provides that essentialal service structures are
conditional uses within an"P' Industcial distric� In considering an application for a Conditional Use
Permit, Section 5.6(5) of the Zoning Ordinance provides that the City shall consider the following facwrs:
The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, and welfa� of occupants or
surrounding lands.
lhere are no occupants of this site or the property on wtuch'it sits. ..
There are aLso no residential properties adjacent to or in the immediate
vicinity of the site. The surrounding lands are all zoned for indust�ial
or business purposes. The communications facility proposed is designed
to serve those types of uses, as well as the general public. Providing
improved oellular telephone capa,city and coverage to the surmunding area
will have a posidve impact on the surrounding area and present and future
businesses in the area.
• Existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets.
The cell site will generate appmxunately one maintenance visit to the site
per month. The technician visiting the site will pull onto the site off of an
existing curb cut along Northland Drive. The� will be no parking on any
City streets or any othec adverse impacts on traffic condidons or parking facilities.
• Effect of the proposed use on the Comp�hensive Plan.
The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for industrial uses. The cell site
is consistent with and serves this type of use. The use is therefoc�e consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan
• The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the
community.
Essential Services Structure
Highways 55 & 494
Page 5
The cell site is located in an area of the City zoned and guided for industrial
uses, at the intersection of State Highway 55 and Interstate Freeway 494.
The site is perhaps as far from msidential devlopment as is possible within d
City of Mendota Heights, and will not be de,trimental in any way to the healt
safety or general welfare of the community. To the contrary, providing imp�
cellular telephone coverage and capacity will be beneficial to the community.
• The proposed use will not cause serious traffic congestion or hazards.
As indicated above, access to the site is via an existing curb cut from a City
which will be used approximately once a month for maintenance purposes.
• The proposed use will not seriously depreciate sunounding property values.
AT&T Wireless Services has installed over SO cell sites throughout the state.
In no instanoe has there ever been any evidence that a cell site has caused any
dep�ciation of suirounding property values, let alone seriously depreciated
property values. For instance, AT&T's curnent site just east of Interstate
Highway 35E and Highway 13 has had no impact on surrounding property
values since its installation two years ago.
• The proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this
Comprehensive Plan.
and the
One of the purposes and intents of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comp�hens�ve ��
Plan is to provide e.ssential servioes to the public, including communication se�vioE
For. the reasons set forth in g�ater detail above, a cell site in this general locat�on
is necessary to provide adequate oellular telephone service to this a�a of the C ty
and surrounding areas. Allowing the cell site to be locat�ed here, subject to
masonable conditions, is consistent with the puiposes and intent of the Zonin
Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
The Variance and Hardship.
The Zoning Ordinance allows a height of 45 feet in the Industtial wning district, whic
increased by SU% for certain uses. In order to provi@e adequate cellular telephone servioe to t
the City, particularly in light of the mlling wpography in this area, it is necessary to have a 12
this cell site. City staff has therefore dinected that we apply for a height variance for the pole.
Section 5.5(1) of the City Zoning Ordinance provides tha�
The Council may grant variances from the strict application of the provisions
of this Ordinance and impose conditions and safeguards in the variances so
granted in cases where there are pracdcal difficulties Qr undue hardships in
the way of canying out the strict letter of the regulations of this Ordinance.
can be
is area of
foot pole at
Essential Services Structure
Highways 55 & 494
Page 6
In this instance, a variance is �quested because there ac� no pracdcal difficulties in that cellular
antennas located at the maximum height allowed by the Ordinance would be ineffective in providing
cellular telephone coverage to the surrounding area. The situation is sunilar to that of a water tower,
which must be placed at a height sufficient to provide adequate water pressu� and water service to the
community.
The Zoning Ordinance goes on to provide, in Section 5.5(5), that in considering applications for
variances, the Council shall consider the following:
• The effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfa� of the community.
See discussion above under Conditional Use Permi�
� The effect of the proposed variance upon existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and
air, danger of fine, risk to the public safety.
See discussion above regazding traffic impacts. This single pole and small
shelter building will have no effect on light or air to sunounding buildings.
Nor is there a danger of Sre. The pole is oonstructed of steel and the st�elter
building of concrete, and the building has an internal halon 5ne suppre�ssion
system. With respect to public safety, we have submitted to the City Inspections
Department the engine�xing specifications and construction inspections of the
facility which confum that it has been built to all applicable safety standards.
We will also fence the facility if the Council feels that is appropriate.
• The effect on values of property in the sumounding area.
See discussion above.
•'ihe effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
See discussion above.
The antenna pole has been designed and constructed at the minimum height necxssary to provide
adequate cellular telephone service to the area served by this cell site� As the City Planner pointed out in
his Februazy 23,1993 planning report on AT&T's existing cell site in Mendota Heights (copy enclosed),
communication struct�u�e.s such as this monopole normally need to be substantially taller than the normai
height allowed in the Zoning Ordinance. This is bacause the oell site needs to maintain a line of sight to the
reciver of radio signals and the�fore must be at a height tall enough to clear trees and the varied temain in
the area. A height less than that necessary to provide adequate cellular telephone servioe would be a
hardship rest�icting the ability to serve the public.
Conclusion.
lfiis letter and attachments should serve to explain our application and to answer issues required by
your ordinance. If we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me at 612-8446742. I and
Essential Services Structure
Highways 55 & 494
Page 7
other representatives of our Company will attend Planning Commission and City Council �
addmss any additianal questions you may have. AT&T Wire2ess Services appr�eciates the
we have m.,ceived from the City Staff, and we lool� fon�vard to working with you to better;
in #ius area. �
T�►ank you for your consideration.
Sincerely
ed O an
Property Manager
�etings to
>istance that
ve the public
�
ry�x� �ul 7J �JC.• yyrl'1 1lFWlV 1 H WNI�L.1JW11Jt
rossrx D. Zw�►x
ATPORNEYAT UW
4e0t wt�TilriSAtFET
' 8L�001ffi�ta2qN. 11�IPAY&�R'A SS437
�►oonesu
�Brsot�rs s3o-t ta • twc a3s�s�si
August i, 1995
Mr. Max Thompson
Cellular One
7900 Xerxes Avenue Soutn
Bloomington. MN 5543t
Dear t�lr. Thampson:
VIA FACSXMILE
721-4770
At your request I contacted my client, Mr. �iichael Christopherson,
the owner of the 6eneral Pump building at 1174 Northland Drive,
in Mendota Heiqhts.
Mr. Christopherson fs out of town, but he is famiiiar with•the
tower you have erected in the southwest quadrant of Highwny 55
and I-494. He has asked that I inform you that he has no objection
to the tower and .w�ould support yau in your application for a
Conditional Use Permit with the City of Mendota Heights.
Please feel free to call me if I may be of any further assistance.
Sincerely ,
seph D. Zwa
torney at L w
cc: Michael Christopherson
6eneral Pump/U.S., Inc."
�
,
�
0
m
�
2'-0"
�.ct-aa2o
4 �R FERO
8AT �� ��� .Ot{�
�--3'- �—�i
�
z
0
28'-0"
2e'—e•
T RENRN CROUND BAR '
. .
OI
, � ----- ----- -----� c�
LAf-1 U1F-0 RCF-0 RCF-1 RCF-2
Q
--- c�) %) ui --- �"� ---- �"�
8'-4" 41 0
x
�=�i
� RR 0101 • •
.Ol COPD , —«�'—Oj+— � 2�—�� c�
(C) .Ol � I I
(e) '� ----- �
---- i!, a
IU � � AIF-1 + AIF-0
� .� (A) �A)
'• NOTE 23
- f b�/v�a � ,
� � �
IAENQOTA HdGHTS �N> MN_71 '
.` .
.
QeTE IAST CORRECIED C Z�'I
8— 1-9
� A 2 —2
' SYM G
• SPACES. ENR GUARDS
LENOIN OF FRAMES
' SEE NO7E 7.
TABLE N0.2
SHEET 2 s2 �
T— BMRR—K3—01
I�CC5Es�
.'
�
_ �-
F.cDErZAt. CaMMUNICATIdNS•CQMM(SSfdN
' FtELC CPERaTtaHS HUREaU
OcCobe� 23, L9:�Q
si.:oc�y G. �T_.T.ay
D a�?g_ e�a Sh=� ?,a�r aa� tJb a.:. :�c .
30� ?�=s � 3•re=c:e Kc: ��
Sc�ice 2ZQ
:i���eznoL•'s . 'jrI* 5540L
Des.- w-. �17cv:
. • .�..
� E - � �'.?.
..owcs Rv�.r so�
64S radera L H�ildi.ag
3ic Y. Raberc Streec
Sc. PsaL. t� SStOI
R
= z� :rr:�i:.g i: :_s�acse �c ;cc:= �qu:-! =t�Z�i�g ?cc ac�.:::wg oF ceL*c-
Za: �aoae a�e.zc? ,cs aac� �:e ?:c�eaee o; re�ores cr cecasiats o= �ce=--
�e=ecce ait� ;ca� n?ecc:o� e�czr=z�zae e�_.ce�c.
_ae SL. ?a�: ?:e�� 0==�,ce, _:.zT� Goc_zraes sc:reac: (=03) s�h� 3�_�su o=
��� _ ��_ra: .c�cs:.:�zCio�s Cc,:_:ssiott �I��s� -s rZspo.s�� rar �.:sc::�
co����ce = z�� �cs� o: t:.� =ec�s.azL �Ies e:sc t.�e Cr—.`.ss�a z�� :sce:s.
�= a=so g:e7�e z vz=u�� o: sew:ces zad sFecisZ sssisczace ca rCC
l:cease�s zac =a :.�e prb==� _ Ge�e:zliry�, � c:era is s caests'_�-.t rega��g z �
:e�v?sica,.ssC:.o. o: e.th�- -?CG:••Y�`esr�e�•�brez�cisr^�.:..g eszc:cj � 't�s,s :��d,' . ' -•�, • �
:= 7ecld be =eg:ster�d �ies ae:r e£�.�-'.ee. '="ae �a:is�:�ctice c= the Sc. ?saT
':.e� Of�:�ee a�-rers zi? v� �:.:�esezs s:i,c: Ka:� D=koez r� �orcicas a£ Sauc� ..
�zkacz, x:sco:.s= :� Sica:,g�:.. Cersp3.s�ts e� be regzscereL iith c:s e�te:
vi ceLeghoae e: bp �r=-i�g ac�r a`��e at ese s�:eve zddrest. '
e asJ� recei?e� �c co�g3a=::a c_ i.aterfere�ee �ich �oae ert:oa:e eater-
=i:�eat eqcs�zeat 3: t�e -s:� Ci.c�� srea er scrz+here vicix� c�e jursdictioa
= ec�: e€:ica zs z rzstile of ceL�Isr phaee trsasairsiear. 2kis is aac
c:��::s=.:g si; ee t�e �:eqLe»cus aa vh3�h c»e ce1L•slsr sTsc� 3 Iieecsed. te
pet:ce =rt laczCed ia Cae L:Lc.s itig$ fseq�e,cT (Ui�) bu.d v�i,cFt is ss3az-
=c=»r�% S�ke.- tsa: :adie aad ce?,evzsi,oa �eiueacies. Iizere sre relzcivelT
av ethe= c:ia»ael: i� chu f:eqceaey ra:.�e f�ich brozdcs=C p=oS=zra=-.g
�ce�ded �or t�e ge�eraL gc:bi�:.
hepe Clus =aje:s your qc:ese:oas. If yv� aeed say Eu:c�er iafor�atzoa
�ac:cc ace :c (5I2) 290 3819. �
zcerely�
��� / .
��:c . raTC:,:t_� I:
;:.z...: T:t Cas:;r
1�=J
a
. s
; ttt�+i�'lfrPii.�tYiA
r� �
�'���.
' ..�
1 -�!
. •,' -
!XL"aZ, Ctit t]f
.
�IttSLiflLi<}22
. . • � ,
�S'i � -
t:oL�ir.,?};cr i. t ��`}
��
'ccanoEagics t.4r. �cz :�a�sr;
s'rocc� Rec ���, �=�nera# M�naq�r
U.S. 'rY�s: �aifutar
' C'�tla' C::cWEy. St1ii8 d10
98CJ 4rr;t i�ad �t
Minnatcaic�„ Mlnnesat� ��3
De�r :'4U �Gnd�s:
1 �n �vr��� tc ti�ri.k �cu ;at ; cr:r cantia�:� �^.�aer�ti�a f� �cc•r�ic�cg ti�e �st �
to 'pc��t sr.��,..Mi�rs �nd �a 3X�ff'SS t'�:y 5.�,��.r^»!i �Gt t'�1Ca�'f ��nt �fCW��t.
r.J ��.v !{:��'"':�/� 1:�"�iw t�.�.wri .�c+.QTf �as1 as.W� �Gi�� 3�Vv �. i� 3�.•1 C(+��i'.i�Rf•C., 4G
Lsess ;�cr� � n�#� cf caltvi:t sarri�. i«� 9-�•f sy�:: '�, ves th� t�rr� t
a2svi� w�,:� �nncsai�3► hy �rig ���E �� e�ar �.�acf ��x.c�ag. t
�nizar�r.�s u�i c�pabf��y by �ic�g �-t� 1 � ti4��� �� �r..{±�� ��:iii1C+,,'��► � MtP
��S.+.r
�t�It�:,�. i� �tavfd@S •t�`�e-cr"'�s":itsiitf. �Ct C.'t-�i+��pc� en�ri�c'I �P��tt•
�
?-�•t ssrri�
ifC2Ci! t:£'Il�ci
��c ��ty
�cc�t sa��
n� t$te�iioa,s
.. . -
Yc�t ::;� �� ?:�to tccr�� caltut� �-3-t �;s ►Q �:a.ptocs� �uac aafe�y ansfr:�r�q n: �nd �criss
!c�s:r �:�,�i ;�r z..s�cc� �•�-i zv�i�a�t6ty F�s �sn � s�qr�u� � etp ta ��r�fc saf�y. tR i�E6, tl��
L^E��a �lau�y S�fe Pairol dzs�tc.� csr�tet �nsNered �Cut?� c��Ctt�r �-t•i cXlts pe c�aath. i his
;¢�+r, w.e� c��c 2.Qt�t3 �ils a rnonth z� rs�cnc�d �. iit� ir.c.-�`asa irt�:f�s I�it r s�.�ss
tn eotGr,g �uui�r tela�cn�s, �r�d ycr�r he{p in adu�ticg yc�.x subs�tbecs �bo�ct 9- •1. i�`,�ry cf
'.��a.�e s-:-i ��s �ported e�ergenaes 3r,,�ted a�r�y fron cw:r�n�onei teiepho so �itcct�r
s�vsd Y:���s tin�. 'Ttte rrc�i ciiy cf cs�tiuikt ��rvis:a �a:r�.z�rtts tha ctczlvetsa�t�j ct uy� °-1•t
s;+&tsn ;; �cc�r`.da � ta�! ��nefit to the �.�t , «'h�. �
�t {�s ;.�+n a�ta�sure wcrSc(ng ;vitt� ycu to bdrtg the berte�ita crf 9-1-1 end cettc.�at a r�icz to t: �
�nm::»�os cf Mtnrtsscta. Mic�nesc;a t� ptavd af cur �.:�Hs�'urtent uf s��tew{de •t-t. Yaur
��arts �t ev$n;crst s;�tewi�8 c#au�u secvic} is a�pr�ated �xf enpuc�ged i ize �sritm�ded
graNttt cf ��Ik:1:r s2tvlca ts �a tr;��;act�t �;un� ta 4-t-i ��:.�t��acy rego�ing. 1�'te ok forwarr}
to tcsr�►=r Jcint �ffarts ta provid� this sacvica ia more tdian���:�r.�.
S r t� J +
' �i" �"'������%'� .
+� "`.�
-•�,,,�.,
�1me5 F. cr.; atS�7sGyat
S!�!� �•1- t f'roJaci t�4atta�Qr
$uIIinRZ : i OC:�nOk���a3 Ciivi�;{�;i
July I2, I995
Mr Ted 01soa
AT&T Wireless Services
2515 - 24th Aveaue South
Minaeapolis, �T 55406
RIGHT OF ACCESS
Gas Lines 0203 & 0204
Sec 34, Twp 28, Rge 23
Dakota Couaty, Minaesota
�
• ' .
Northem States Power Company ,
414 Nicatlet Mall
Minneapo(is, Minnesata 55401-1927
Telephone (61� 3305500
Dear Mr OZson:
This is ia regards to aur �eetiag yesterday, JuZy 12, I995, whereby �ve
dfsCttsBed thatt AT&T is g+Oiag to build tt stx'uCtuz+e i2ext tA NSP'8 eatsea�eat
area for a gres p�peline. I appzov+ed that AT&T could use the easemeat
area �or access to the wrorks�te. I aZso xpp�rov+ed the r�ght of access
ov+�x the easea�eat area aace a aionth for maiate�ance purposes.
Sincerely,
JUDY S VIX
Seafor Real Tsstate Represeatative
Laad & Itight of Way
330-5619 -
c Bruce AnseZ - 1►II1T DOT
m
a
�
;
#
i
�
" ;l
' 95 02 � 49Pi•f COt�'! 'il� � 359-5856
�
A.T. and T. �V'ireless
ZSIS 24th Ave. Sauth
11�nneapoIis, MN 55406
AZ'T�NTIOl�% Mr. Ted Olson
8fL195
1
Si].�iJFCT: Hvw rare is a polc fa�u�e aad wha�t wrnsld haggGa i€ a pole �ca to
; Me�ciota Si� 12S F�t. Faic
Dear Mr, Olsom:
.�n �" tltll�• �� �r�r,H •«►�� : Ir �� ' �� ��� s � � s �:..:t rl� . u� J��.,.« �� r�r.e�Ull • 1��
NNlift U .!a t t � t 1�': �1l1 .il.t i:! `/( t 1: ♦ 1�ai �t Ii, ►• t ! '•�i t t:i ' 4{
• ► . r � u �.; � � r ► � ��r, � . i . �.... � • :.� r • .n�� nn� • ��i,. 1: ri.-, ni
•� y a � s � e 1�+�ti air.� v�t�� s w.s v:�• •, --. ..,tt ✓. r s• '-, tt .+ .{_ �v�, i
�IY. '� � 1 � r.l Y. 11� � ' •:� t/:�+ ✓•�n/�H � IM � •III��+IIUI ' t��.:1 ..;�1 � �+� � ,
•t3lt l+� � j t M�tt�l i: i(Y. `t )✓. � !•' •�/ t ":iLa ' • •ttit:t ' •♦ t•«'.t i s i�tl
/�: 1�:'. Illli: �ti :.1 :U � �� •'1 il ••' I�a It111 . "•') 1 1' .1� l� ��1� JI �• Y.1 11 � 1'
t ��ttR R i t a� ii. s�.,?t •.it M1{it.t; . �! :i ' � �+: ..a
!' t�i . Ff •�1Nitili�i � t hI t i G- 4l�i • si •' 1! • it f..tiy Ut .�i {t . r'ri! t_i4r.
« • :�i� .N.y r. �.� : � •1 • 1 u���l� .�N � 1 «ulv: r,u�� :� � �� �...n • ��1.��
. t • ' i![..��it✓. i! i i ! t .' t i Vii1 +�. •I ! . R t}t : � •� i " e . Y.t{-} .I # fti • i .�/.•
� :. •iu Illu�l w: � ► � � ► ri�tl .�. � �1 • ' Ct f �-' • �L.' ' r.�� � .� � 1� 1� .a1 1•
I• i' Y i i� i i i.:.i i: t•ti': �' ft •"� H�Mii �:ti f/l : t i r.i� ♦: � 11r,� t✓• f 1' i/ :� •7
I ' 1 � 1 ' � ' 11 fl ' r• 1�� -� •• 111 �1 � -�R�� �1 .+� r� • ' t ' .�� .. � 11 �11 .����.� '1
�M• i!� 1 i�+f1i t it• i:tt • i7 {: • i/ it.tit V11 '�t4t t�. ♦ iiiililiil �-:i� il{ ii�ti) `�l ' . �•�
I-✓. `1. �1 11 ' 1�.1 :1 11� 1��1 -� : • 1• 1:. 1.� 1 1�• H � � 1 � � f .�. �+di J1•�+� • 1�1 �1,"
�ilt:-." it��ii i :�: 1I �•►�� •+• .`i.i' �t�.r.t14 // : �{ �i .t " Yt{ i ' f�i 1 f � .�1 .JI
I ���1� 1 le: ! • �11 M�• 1• • r�1 �,�♦ ► � ' ♦ � / M�1/ .ti {! .1 .+.�1 ! 1 .i �1 `1f �'�.
� � . t �' � �i •1 � � . 1 • � r't)t �1 • • 1 � �r""++�tl 1� {f t�l �1 Y.IIr+,
1'� �.i.A. 222 Ravis�oa E x+eqwrcmaaots waold di:�c ia Dakota Caamty Mi�dnesata a a�
"basic� des%ga �rimd. spe�d of 80 m�h with no icx a�d 69 mph with t1.5 ir�es o� ssda`al ux
was �'ove�' d�i�" b� y�ou �d � 9� m� wina wrth o.s �s af r�at ire.
ovez y�ou
docs�tbis load case exceed tfu bigl�st lisaag ia th� sYate, it rapres�aats aa "mter de�rig,�t" i
ut�asc m�c►�ud Ioadamg ovcr ab�at E.I.A. �c}uir.+�s. 1`!me wind s�ed used c1�e�ds on if
!
�
�
s �
t . -
�
: �
' ttt sr
� '
.Ii�fY 2• •' .�
�
Yoargale
Not a�Iq
E2T9�
: l,oc�tioa� of
thc site within tilc stat�,
�unimiva laading.
Valmont's policy is to vsc the wind loading listcd in E.I.A. 222 as a' �
Statistically, th.e wind speed•listed ia E.I.A. 222 is met or raccceded an avcrage of only omce in SO
years.'rb.ig wind is also a. "fastcst mi�k" wind which means that ii is th� fasrest average vcloc,ity of a
mile of wind pasang a pomt. For cxam�lc, a 70 mph avezage fast�st mile wind would taire 51
SCCOrid9 t0 pBSS a�olIIt. ThLS SI�d3rd "faSttst m1�C�' wind IS mOdl� by f�.iAts to SCcvuAt fOr
g',,I1SL4, tCl�'dln. CffCCIS SIId V1I�iI0II Of WmL� SpC� WI�1 �IC1�L. `r�]G WIDd 8� �011 b3V6 S�
represe�s sosnct�ing wcll over a"oa�x ia o�c huadred. ycar stoan."
The loads genaatcd by tliis wima, ice ana rhe weighc of th�� memhers are thm nsca to s3ze membe�s
of the ;pole. Tlarere is at le�ast a ZS 9b fa�r,or of safety reqau�cd. This ass�,es that ti�e wind is blo�ving
from tb,e worst possibk directiun. T�,e wind mvst ccc.ad all our �tes for spe�d, dnratioa. be at
tt�e worst orirentation and mrercQmc ttu facLor of safcty. -
I.et us assume that a pole ba:om�s overloa,cled. The typical constqu,eacx of this ov�erioadin� is "Ia�I
buckiing" where a relatively small poxrioa of the s�aft disoorts and "laaks" t�,e soxl. �f paa c�a
�� �b $ P� arou�d your 1�x. If the pipe Yinks it wC�til,d bc a lOCal bu,ckl'mg', if tbc pipe
would t�ioe thc shape of you�c I�e it wonld be yieldiag. Althaagh botbt things can happen w� aqxct
the Yink to ocxur. Tl�is does not usuaily causc a free falliag pole. Af�r the ]cialdng. it t�laes some
force to bend the pipe, �tot ss much as bcfore tibe Idnk, bat some forrx unne the Iess. Poles beitave
� sa�ime way. In tiestmg, Poks ]�ve bxa capablc of cauying the tAu�z�e vcztic�l (weight)load aad a
sabs�al por�,on of the load that caaised the laaTang. TI�e l�mlc ia dne pole waild be verp
notic�,abie a�ad the �Ie capa�icry woald be reduxd. A polc timt had b�a Yialaed shatild be rapls�ced
baa�sac it wovId nnt be saf�e.
1�a ane 3 me�haaisms whi�t prcv�ent the pole from a frx fall type fa�lua�e. F"ust, as tite pole is
loade� tbe pole movcs. This m,ovemcat c�a ori�t t�e pola betfler ia t�e wmd. Ia ti�� case of a poLe
that starts to idnlr, tt�e movemeat of tbe stixi maloes ihe rest of t�e pole taloe a big�tr si�arc of the
load. ; Scco�d� aRer tlbe pale �an1�s a portioa of t�e poie may be clascr bo the g�ro�d, r�ttci�g tinc
levex ],e�ngth of ffie wiad fo�cx. The �d phao�omeaon w,d most �po�ar, is th,e �r�ure a�tbe fonx
�S aPP�- '4Ve eacpcct the wia,d to prodoce tius forx. but tba wia,d is nrot gcaezallY �9�
aP�uY ����- Z�e highe�r ti�e atiad spxd t�e Iess I�oely that t3�e Wi�d spccd w71 be
mai�aincd. We ]mow in oor avetyday lives tbat a S mph wia�d caa be qnme �roammon but a 40 mph
wiad �gust do�n't baPP� �Y o�a �od wi�,en it does it is n,ot for very lung. Po1cs a� very
S�iile. In ordcr for the wi�d �o cause damage �o the pole and maloc it fall, the wind mnst at ]ast
long an+ough for the savcmre to "see" t�,e load.
Valmont has provided s�ro�ctares tliat baoe pertornzed weII dnrmg ti�e arthquak�es ia
Cali�oraia, tbe hmri�nes ia the Soath, and z nnmber of ta�nstdces. To m�y imowieclgse,
Y�ont h�s Yuv�ar ezptrieaced an in se�a f�iiare o! a c,o�nuni�pti� poi� dae to �
� overloadYng, er�tu thon�, as in the c,ases of Hurrican�e Hugo aad Hn�cricarie Andrt�,
the wind speeds a�y iia�e esceeded the design wYnd speed.
- .. .
' � .. •`. -
. w ,:c• . • • _
� Y�'...��.�� �'�: � •.. ..:��� . .. .. . s'.. ..;i^��:�r:i..��• • - -y ' . ... ...... ,_�.
' .. •'njL,{la �. L7 ��r � � �.i� � V{�4 �� � � � � "`�"10� � � � �
bCCa d� Tl�lst � �L � �S �4 C� �. �s � �� W�th
Cii� t� I3 i�1v�8i �0� Ot� iLOCi Ot � C�RC�G �� �PIi�C �Ot � �S �
by t8e rwmd. Ba�r�e of �is golc`s f�an"61iiy, btcauso ��ov�nd mugt c�e fro� i� .. � -: _.
• dirati,aa, and bocause p�oa h�ve 5pxi8od a Ioadiag th�t � ia a�ch saYa�pol� �e natmal
��• �YJ�� �� as a p=o£cssionai � fsvora t�is p�olt ovrr�c
avera�,e � �zt door.
i
I caaUe rc�cbad at 1-80Q-Valm�at (1-500-8ZS-6668) amd wiII be glsd �o discuss this .
.
i si��ely�
.
, .
:
: • -
�
11
����,. �, : �. ��
,� ��� •�.. .� .�„�����,�� .:�.,.,� � � «���.
: �ii �r�i � n��;•�r��. �
� '
t
i
�
� '
: � '
. `
�
! �
i • .
, �� -
1
PiANI"�iING REPC)►RT
DriTE:
GASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LQCATTON.
ACiiC}N REQt7ESTED:
I��i�7f�i��t,i►�i
Pi.ANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
Background
IXCOAMRATEI)
CONSULTIiVG PLANNEFtS
LA�t3SC�PE AACFiiTEC?S
•i00 FIRST 3VE:vUE i�C1RTE?
SUITE 2I0
MINNEAPOLIS. 1ViIV 55-101
622•339•330Q
23 Febniary 1993
93-03 . •
CeIlnlar 4ne
880 S�Iey Memarial Highway
Cauditioaai Use Pernsit for Aaiencied
PUD/Variaace f+or Height of .Antenna
Pale
John Uban.
Cell One is pmposing to erax a cellulaac telephone t,ransmissiaa faciiity oa a site ia the Riveawoo� PIace
Business Park loc�ci along H'tgh�hwap 13. As e�plaiacd ia the insornnation furnished bp CC11nIar One, .
this site is aeei�ed ta pnavide adequate service ta �cir custiamers. As �� ceil�ul�r phone iadustrq�has
maxured,, there is a need throughout �e Metropoli�aa Area fnr cellntaz piLane ti:�n�issioa sites.
C�Ilular One has submitted detailed informatioa about the health aad safety eff�cCs of #he traasmission
fac�ity wliich is siiown to be well vsrithi�a the f�edernt aud smte staadaz�is re�,*arding ele�romagaetic
energy. The sut�eana gole has da�on t�o shaw its safe desiga The proposed Iocaxion is adjacent
to a NSP pawer G� aad their taulc �arm. To th� east aad sou�east af the site, beyond dte NSP
faciiities, Iie t�e siagie f�y neighborhoods of Cherrq �iis and Park PLace. Atso, east of the site is
the Ecolab Corporate Fac�ty. "
The site is in aa txisti�ng Planned Unit Developme.nL which presentiy hoase�s the Riverplace Qffice
Building aad CDI MerliCai Fa+cility. CDI daes m�dical imagiag aud ace�s a magne,tic fieid which has
pmtectivc fencing amm�d the site. The proposed cellular phone facr�ity is located beyond the inSueace
of the ma,ga�ia field. ,
The cellular phone transmissioa site oonsists primarily of a 75 foot tall mono pole wi� a triaci of
anteanas Iacateid an top. A IZ %ot by 28 foot bridc buiidiag, desigucd � mat+ci� +pastia� st�udures ia
�e PUD, hoases the computer aad radid ��sm1�cion eqaipm�ni. The pole is locaLed tiaward the center
of the Iat with a minimum 7S foat setbacic � the praperiy Iiaes.
iellular One,Case 93-03 23 February 1993
2
�Since the proposed site is within a PUD, the site plan and structiues and uses must adhere � the PUD,
and the PUD needs to be amended to accommodate the cellular transmission operation. Add tionally,
the variance for the height of the antenna pole needs to be reviewed.
PUD Amendment & CUP
The existing PUD has two buildings that front onto Highway 13. The remaining two lots in
not have direct access or visibility to Highway 13 and have remained undeveloped. The PU
a private loop road connection through all four lots with access to parking. Also, the sidew
within the PUD is designed to connect all of the sites together. The greatest affect this facil
have would be on the adjacent building tenants within the PUD. Landscaping and azchitecti
compliance has been incl�ded in the proposed Cellutar One faciliry.
The building architecture is designed to match existing buildings with a brick facade and a
with sloping soffit to match the exisring• structures.
The site is screened to the east by a row of existing trees, and additional landscaping is prc
west side of the structure providing screening to the existi.ng buildings. Although the adjac
has no specific proposed plans, the landscaping of the antenna pole and building should be
minimize views from the south. The applicant has included photographs showing the positi
gote as it relates to views from Highway 13 aad from residenrial areas to the eas� The resi
have to look through woads, several power Iines, and, in some cases, the NSP tank farm b
would be a view of the proposed antenna.
The PUD also requires a connecxing road system and sidewalk system. The site plan as pro�
not accommodate this and should be revised to accommodate the loop road, parking, and sid
system through the site. This would necessitate moving the building aad die pole slighdy to
Without the continuation of the road system, circulation will be poor for the interior sites.
e PUD do
calls for
: system
might
IPUD
>f system
�ed on the
vacantlot
luded to �
�f �e
�tial areas
re there
sed does
vallc
ie west
The proposed use would not interfere with the other uses within �e PUD. The site is zoned B-1 wluch
allows radio and televisioa wwers as a conditional use. A technical point needs to be co ed by
Cellular One that their facility and CDI's facility in fact do not create aa interference probl Aa
additional 30 foot setback from the Cell Oae's site between CDI has been noted in their plans d
should be sufficient to minimi�P ���erence.
Several of the enclose� drawings show the antenna and building in a different position oa the roposed
site. The review of their development has beea based on the premise that the lazge-scale bluep ' t
drawings that included landscaping were the cuizent and more accurate plans. Cell One shoul confirm
the exact plan they are wishing to have considered for approval.
Height Variance
The property has underlying zoning of B-1 ia which radio and television towers are allowed th
condidonal use permitting process. These Wwers would normally need W be substantially talle
the normal height allowed in the ordinance. The ordinaace allows the height for a structure to
feet plus 50 percent for various utilities and add-ons. The tota152 aad one half of allowed hei�
sufficient for the operatioa of a cellular phone transmission fac�ity. The struc,ture needs a gen�
line-of-sight to the receiver of the radio signals necessitating a height tall enough to generally c
and the varied terrain ia the azea. For the proposed sesvice area of �e facility, a height less th
feet would be a hardship restricting the ab�ity to serve the public.
iugh the
�an
e 35
�t is not
r trees
75
�
0
Ceiluiar 4ne,Cs�se 93-03 23 February X993 Page 3
The phatos enclosed show tiae views from the existing residential properties wautd nat be imQeded by .
the installation of the '75 foot antenna,
Adion
.. Si�aatures of tfle adjacent landowners were not submitted and a public hearing needs to be keld.
Review the conditional use permit and amendeQ PUD wi� height variance request and make `
recommendatioa to City Council. Conditions which may be cansidered are as fallaws.
1. AII activities whiGh creaxe elecxrical emissians s�ha11 corapiy with the minimum requiremeats
af the Federal Commuaications Commissiaa.
0
2. Camplete dre connecting road system through the pmpexty to comply with the PUD plan.
3. Campl�te the sidewatic system through the property W compiy with the PUD piaa
4. Add additional iattdscape screeaiug to buffer �e adjacent vacant lat within the PUD.
5. Coufirm in writiug that ihe f�ci�ity does n�ot coaflict with the aperatioa of CDL
6. The facility should only be used for the trans�ission of cellular phone couversataions.
Addidonal amte�nna requests would i�ave w gat thraugh aa amendmeat of die conditional use
P��-
�. Street Iighting ta be iast�lled t;a pmvide safe ingress aud egress on �e priwate mad. .
c
�
�
0
0
July 31, 1995
Mr. Ted Olsan
AT&T Wireless Services
5uite 3Q1, �9Q0 Xerxes Avenue Saath
Blooming�on, MIrT 55431
Dear Mr. 01son;
Ciyoi'�
.��er�do�a Hei hts
I: i a1! ! :� �I`�!: :��
This 1e�t�er is to provid� you with an outline of .the steps neoessary for aa appli�tic
Condit�onal Use I'ermi� for a Cell�:tar Telephone 1Yansmission Tawer aud E+quiPm
as required in the "I" - Indas1ria12oning Disdrict in Mendota Heights. The telep]
�ransmission #ower is cpnsidered a Condi#ional Use in ihe "�" - Industaal. Zoning l
are A�aoessary Strudures such as the equipment shelter. (Ple,ase see attached copy
19.2{S�r and Section 19.2{IO} of the Zoning C)niinance.)
In a��ian, any building penmit tbat is songht in the B and I 2;oning Distri�ts in 1VIea
Heights reqni�res C�ty Couacil revi�ew, �as we discus�sed oa 7aauaty 19,1995. (Pl,e�
attached c�opies Section 19.4 and 4,17 of the Zoning Ordinance.) I would mge thaz
obtaia a complete c�py of the Citp's Zoning 4rdinaace so tha�t pou are aware of all t
requirements that may affect the prc�posed tower and shelter, espec�ially S�ciion 19 w
nncludes ths regulations for ihe "I" Indusl�i,al �►istxic�.
All applica�ions for a conditional use p�xmit which a� irutiated by the p�ition of the
owners of the pmperty in question shall be fileci with the city Cle�k no lat�r tban twe�
{�1) days p�;ceding the n�ct reg�iaady schedul�ed Planning Commissian me�ing, All
applir,ations for canditic�naJ. use per�mit shall be a000mpan�ied by twenty ("l0) capies of
plans and graphics containing the fo31o� infor�m.ation and folded, where necessary,
size of eight aad ona-half by eleven (81/2 by 11) inches.
5.6�2)b �Site Development Pl�aa, wbich shall include:
1. Location of all buildings on the pmperty in quesGion including both
Pmpased sfxucxures. � . �
2. Location of all adjac�it buildings locatsd. within thnee hundred fiifty
of the exteriar boundazies of the properly in qnestion, - �
3. Ploor amra rdtio.
4. L�catioa and number of e�cisbng and pmposed garkyng spa,c�s.
5. Vehicular cim,�l,ation, . - �
�r a
Shelter,
ncx, as
Sec�ion
r�fer to
�
set of
r t�e
and
�
� R •
i101 Victoria Curve�-Niendota�Hei,ghts, �1ViN y.551i8���� �::45 •1850 " "���`'`��'. _
Mr. Ted Olson
Ju1"y 31, 1995
Pa.ge two
6. Architeetural �levations (fype and materials used of all external surface).
7. _ Sewer and water alignment, existing aad proposed. .
8. Location and candle power of all illuminaries.
9. Location of all existing easements. �'
5.6(2)c Dimension Plan, which shall include:
1. Lot dimensions and area..
2. Dimensions of proposed and existirig strudures.
3. "T�►pical" floor p1an and "typical", �+oom plan.
4. Setbacks on all buildings located on property in question. �
5. Proposed setbacks.
5.6(2)d Gra.ding Plan, which shall include:
1. P.xisting contour.
2. Proposed grading elevations.
3. Drainage confiiguration.
4. Storm sewer catch basins and invert elevations.
5. Spot elevations. -
6. Proposed road profile.
5.6(2)e Landscape Plan, which shall include:
1. Lo�ttion of all existing tciees, type, diameter and wluch trees will be removed.
2. Location, type and di.ameter of �all proposed plantings.
3. Location and materi.al used of all screening devices.
Ia addition to the twenty sets of plans required for a Conditional Use Pemut application, it will
also be nacessary to submit a completed Mendota Heights Planning Appli�ation Form, a
planning application fe� in the amount of $350 for a CLTP, a letter of intent regarding the
proposed use and stcudures, twenty copies of arclutedural elevations, and a certificate of
abstiacx listing all pmperty owners within three hundned fifty feet (350') of the subject
P�rtY• -
Complete and proper applications will be scheduled for the Planning Commissioa andlor City
Council only after all required materials have beea submitt�d. Late or iaoomplete applica�ions
will nat be put on the agenda. In order to be plac�ed on the Planning C�mmissioa's ageada for
A�ugust 22, 1995, it will be necessary for the City to receive a complete and proper application "`�
no later than 4:00 o'clock p.m. on August 1, 1995.
�
e
Mr. Ted O1soII , .
July 31, 1995
Page three
I have eaclosed a copy of the Mendota. Heights Planning Application for your use s ould you
wish to make application prior to the August 1, 1995 deadline. If you desire to ma�e
application for a later Planning Commission meeting, please be advised that the deaidline for
Planning Commissioa agendas are always on the first T�esday of th� month, as per �the
a�tached cvpy of the Applicant Notificatioa Form that was pmvided to you oa Jan 17,
1995. . � �
Sincerely,
�,(�"`' ' �% � � .
,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
cc: Tom Lawell, City Administrator
John Uban, City Planning Consultant
Peter Beck, Attorney
0
i ' p
'J
�
n
.�
�
��
�'
r/�+:
• .�
� � C1t3T O�
,,�, � , . 1Viendota Heights
APPLI�AI�IT i�TOTIFICATION FORM 1"��` F�
Applications will be scheduled for consideration by Planning Commission and/or City
Conncii only afier all reqaired materials have heen snbmitted. I�te or incomplete applica-
tions wilI not be pnt on the agenda. -�
C�(tc.tc�.,r- C�n� Gv� ��- �e(l�+�c�,r �{�,K�
{~� C?�:yv� /�"�r'�*s't�. '�" �f � t e
Foryourplarming request, if proper and complete applicaEion materiaLs and supportive �
documents are submitted by:
_ ' `�`�` i�+ec �. o� ��'L.. �
date
then the public hearing, or review of your case, will be conducted by the:
Parks and Recreatioa Coaunission
date
Planai�ng Commission ?: �O �..R.t .
� �' �t�.,5� �� (�'�on.{�,�
da `
Following oomplation of the public hearing, or Planning Commission rcview, the City
Counai wt�l take action on:
,1�f iues�.� � ��#- �.�.
date .
� � . 3a P, w. .
. � Y�. i� il,�. , . :..r�
�..
�
��.
���� u�. a�
��.��: �` ? 'r
���•� �
ca ��s — .� � T ��w► �re � � � - � �/�r�r,� �e�
� ' r ��- r.. a s
� ��va-�tav�S ai �'t� �vt�S �.� �� �c�E�
C.�.-k.�'i��..�. � �'(���-a.c.-F l�s�r�,_ ��l � � ��7
� ..
UV��« ��
1101 Vietoria urve • en o ei , - li8 452•1850
. b t�"�''r
y
612?21�47?0 ATT WIRE
Post-it" Fa�c Note /b�t
.. � T �'CC.
_ ' ^ �,�.
�� .
_ F��r ... A
Cefttstar Oivi�ian
Ju�.p 14,1995
�S SEt�UICE
�� � ��
�°r^ ot
"� ` �' r w
.. .:�
G � � 's�44--b�
�/1t. �.axl .tZa�]11tISSeli '
Minnesofa Depar�ment of Trazisportatian
Of�ic� of I��ight of W ays and Surveys
Room 511� MS 6
Transpar�ation Building
395 John Xaceland Boulevard �
5t Paul,, MN 55155 . �
F 4se r-�� P-e��.
G. 1
..�.
=A1
-�
..�.-
AT8�7
Suiae
7900
Btooit
612 1
FAX I
RE: Approwal to consi�cuct on MnDOT Rig�.1i of Way
i'ending Iease at S1? :1986(494=393j9U1 Paz�e12�.8 �attach,�d}
Mr: Rasmussen:
Fer our fielephone conversa.fion of tivs aft �unoo�, �e ��n+esota I�
of Transpar#ation {MnDOT) h+�reby agrees to all.ow ACC/McCaw C:�
Muuiea�pQlis aad/or t�teir• assi�gns �o proceed with aonstruction and
i�nstalla�zon of a cellular axi#�na sit� (i�e Pi��� an the above ref�
Prc�perty' as shown on the attac�tted' ��ii'A :
JUL 20 '95 13;2?
I�'1nDt�T has reviewed ihe Prajec�, ca�zsisting of th,e insfallaiidn af a s�e1
oel�ui�r uzoncfpoie, an equipmen� shel�ar, and insta�,a�.an of electricat a�r
t�:iephon,e eabling as n�eda,ed, and with the ex��ion af fin.ai revi.ew ana1;
of the project bp the Federal F�ghway Adminisfraiion (if needed} has
apgroved said Projec� and gras�:�Es ii's authority to aon�[r�zci and opera��.
AC�Iri�1cCaw Cellul�r �of I�ti�nneapolis �#hat xt is px�ooeedi�tg with -
aanstruc#ion with �Iie underistanding #�ia:t if sa�id approval of the Feci�ral
Higltwaq Ada�ni�rsisiraiian is nnE gYan�ed. that, upon nai�.oe by Mni�OT,
ACCIMcCaw CeIIular of M'tinii�eapolis wi11 im�tediatelq oease constaucti
and prom��Iy wndertak,e fio remove a�ny oomplet�ed installation.
E_� .,. :..
Avenue 5ourh
, MN 55a3t
$32-7731
. ACCIMeCaw Cellular of Mi=ut,eapolis agrees �6o ind�nutify, save hanm�Iess,
and relea�e Mnl�OT from art,p claims, ciemands, and causes of ac�ion for
injury or dea�ti of persons or loss of or d,amage to pmpar� oocurring on th
premises which is in any way cosin�ect�ed rwi.th ACC/M�cCaw Cellular of
Minneapolis' use and occupancy of fhe prexnises and has at#ached a Certi�i�
of Insurance eviden�cing cuveragae o� and �or the Pr�ajec�. ..
�
' Ei127214770
.�
ATi �1 I R� SERV I CE
,1S�reed �o tiv.s 13th day of j"uIy,1995.
Minneso�a Degartment of Traitsporfafian
BY: „�<��� ,�-� �l2P,�lCSs���.-- �
Tts: '��c��c.6'c /��� ��'�,� ��
a
F-488 7-6?3 P-902 JtlL 20 '95 13:28
. �
E " . • i
. ; , �
: /,� .�., _
• ..-
�
:
�
Mr. lAtalter Oien
Federal Highway Administration
9 �'t East ?th Ptace -
5t. Paul, MN 55101
Mr. Ted Oison :
AT&T Wireless Services
Suite 301
7900 Xe�ces Avenue South
� Bloamington, MN 55431
Gentlemen:
��
.
� 1'
1��eri.dot� Hei
July 21, 'l995
TRANSMITTED VIA FACSI
Mr, Kari Rasmussen
MN Oepartment of Transpoi
Room 511, MS 6
395 John Ireland Boulevard
St. Paui, MN 55'155
!t has coma to my atten#ion that a cellutar telephone tower a�d equi
shelter has been erected within the City of Mendata Heights on property o
the MN Qepartment of Transportation at the �ntecsection af i-494 and T.H.
This letter is to officially natify you that this installation is in violatian of m�
ordinances and furtfier construction on the project is ta cease immediate[y.
project is naw posted with an afificial "stop work" order and we intend to :
enfocce this prohibifion.
`'C� G�"�--
�
Y +�� ` .
AT8cT 1Nire[ess Services {ACCIMcCaw Ce[tulaf) has undertaken con
on this project withouf making appiication to the City for the required perm
inspections. The City of Mendota Heights takes senousiy its permit and ins
obligations to pratect the heal#h, safety and welfare of the general public, a
enacted reguiations and inspection procedures to uphold this responsibil'ity.
Approvals gra�ted by MnpOT in this case and/ar actions taken by AT&T W'
Services (ACC/McCaw Ceitular) have circumvented this tevel of locai review
may have endangered public safety. . �
At! liabii�ty associated with this instatla�ion rests with MnDQT a�d AT
Wireless Services {ACC/McCaw Celiular) as the City has no knowledge of #
structural integrity of the faciiity, the soit conditions affecti�g such integrity,
quality of installation a�d workmanship, or any other aspect of the co�struc
including its Empact on f�ight operations to and from MSP Intemational A�rpc
iX01 Victoria Curve •1Viendata Heig�ts,lViN • 55118
by
The
s and -
�ection
id has
�eless
and
�T
�
�
the
ion,
rt. .,...:.
�� �
�1850 '�
Messrs. Oien, Rasmussen and Olson
Juljr 21, 1995 '
Page 2 •
Mr. Olson is requested to contact my o�ce on Monday, July 24, 1995 to
discuss the procedures he must follow, and the approvals he must obtain, to allow
this facility to continue to exist within our City. The City reserves the right to
pursue all remedies available, including prosecution, in enforcement of its
ordinances, building codes, and other regulations. �
Should you have questions regarding the �above, please contact me
immediately.
'� Sincerely,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Tom Lawell
City Administrator
cc: Mayor and City Council ��
City Attomey Tom Hart
Code E�forcement Officer Paul Berg
Police Chief Dennis Delmont
FAA Tower Chief Bruce Wagoner -
MAC Executive Director Jeffrey Hamiel
MnDOT Metro Div. Engineer Charles Siggerud
Senator Deanna Weiner -
Senator Jim Metzen
Representative Tim Commers
Representative Ton Pugh
�
September 1, 1995
Mr. Ted Olson
AT&T Wireless Services
7900 Xerxes Avenue South, Suite 301
Bloomington, MN 55431
Dear Mr. Olson:
Your request for
Ci � y o�
1Viendota Hei�hts
Equipment Building will be considered by tt�e City Council at their �
scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday. September 5, 1995.
meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council
iwer and
regularly
; Council
rs. You,
or a representative should plan on attending the meeting in order that your a�plication
will receive Council consideration If you have any questions, please fe�el free to
I
contact me.
Sincerely,
� � ����
� �
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
cc: Max Thompson, AT&T Wireless
Peter Beck, Attorney
1101 Victoria Curve •1Viendota�Heights,�lViN •,55118
• 1850
��
.� �
JAMES P. URKIN
ROBERT L HOFfl1AN
GERALp H. FRIE�EIl
JAMES C. ERICKSOti
EDWARD J. DRISCOLL
GENE N. FU4LER
�—"'� JONMD.fULLMER
ROBERT E. BOYLE
FRANK i. HMVEY
CHARLES S. MODELL' '�-� �
CHRISTOPHER J. DIETZEN
JOtW R. BEATTIE
LINpA H. FISHER
THOhtAu P. STOtTMAM
MICMFEI C. JACKAW�
JOHN E. DIEHL
.lON 5. SriM1ERZCWuKt
THUMASJ.FLYNN
JAMES P t}UtNN '
TOQDI.FREEMAN
PETER K OECK
GERAtO G 3EGK
JOHN B. LUND�UIST •
DAYLE NOtAN"
JOMNA. COTTER'
BEATRICEARpTFMIEiLER �
PNXB.PLUNiCETT. ,
ALANLKII.GOW '
KATMLEEFt A7. P(COTfE NEYYAt+W
MlCMqEL6. tE6WRpN
GFtEGORY E. KORSTAD
GaRYA VANCC£YE'
DANIEL L. BOWLES
TiM6TMY J. MCiAAtifJS
TIAIIOTNY J. KEAt� s .
ILLAN M. NJOERSON
OdNNA 4 R08ACK
MICWIEL W. SCHI.EY
ARTHUR S. HEEMAN
September l, 1995
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY BL LINDGREN, LTD.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1500 NORWE3T FlNRNGIAE CEN3ER
7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH
t '
SLQOMINGTON, MlNNESOTA 55431-1194
'i'ELEPHONE (612} 835-3800
� FAX (612) 896-3333
Mayor Charies Mertensatto
Members of the City Council
CITY QF MENDQTA HEIGHTS
1101 Victaria Curve
.� Mendota Heights, hsinnesota 55118
,1 �
��,
Re: Reques# far Conditianal Use Permit
AT&T Wireless Services
Dear Mayor Mertensotto and Councit Members:
RONN 8. KREG6
TERRENCE E BISHpP
ltSA A GRAY
GARY A RENNEKE
Ct6215TpPkiER J, tW2RiSSMP1.
BRUCE J. DpU(iUIS
WILItAM C. GRtFFRH. JR.
��. .lOMN J. SiEffEMMAOEN
I p4NIEL W. VOSS
'.. JOtiN R. HILL
PEfER J. CQYI.E
PHIUP 6. AL6EN
MICHAEL J. SMITt1
VILIS R. INDE
ON+IGHf N. HCiASBp
M10RE4V F. PERRIN "
ANN M. MEYER
FREDERICK K HAtlSER Ill
IARRY D. MARTIN
JANE E. 9REMER
RENEE L .IAGKuON
CHRI5T4PtiER K tARUS
MARCY R. lCREISMPN
MARIEI. E. PIILQLA
WMON E. SCtiRJ�AtM
SiEPHEN J. KAMINSKI
TFiCNAAu F. I�tE%AT7pER
OANtE1 T. KAD6EC
bHAftNAA WN0.GREN
OF COUNSEl.
JAGK F. DALY
O. KfMMETN UNDGI2EN
NJ.M! E. MULLIG4N
WEM)EtLft.ANOERSDN
JOSEPM GITIS
ROBERTM,KELLER
' ALSO ADMRTED Ml N1SCONSIN
^R1S0 ADI,tJTTFD Mt GEORtilA
0
This Ietter supplements the August 1, 199S appiicatian letter of AT&T Wireless Service (AT&T) and my
letter af August 17, 1995 explaining the circumstances surrounding the installaiion of AT&T cellular
site at I-494 and Highway S5. A capy ofthe August 1'7, 19951etter, with the attachmen s, is enclosed
wzth this letter for your reference, alang with the minutes of the February 7 and 21, 199 City Cauncil
meetings referred to in that letter. '
i
The purpose of this Ietter is ta provide the City Couneil with a written respanse to the c nsideratians
identified in the August 22, .1995 planning report, and to address the Planning Commiss on's concern
about the height of the antenna pole at this cell site. ;
� .
Plannin,�.Considerations ; ' �
. � ,
The�August 22, 1995 planning report sets forth a number of considerations far the Plan
and City Council, most of which AT&T can agree to. Specificaily:
�
`� • AT&T will agree ta pave the access drive and move the turn-around to the �
-•- drive to meet the 10' setback requirement �
; Cammission
side of the_
��
I
i
�
f
4
_____-_—
�
i
X
X X
�
X��
�
X
CUST0�IER C0�1P��I�1T
X
� �
X
�
�� X
�
�
r�
�
_ XX .
� � x� X
�
� � ��
x �
�
�
�
� � � � ���
� XX
�
� � X �
�
� �
X
� � X �
x
�
�
�
�
� � x
X
�
x �
�
XT
� � X
� X
�X
x
X
x August Complaints X
� Ju1y C mplaints
�
E BIT A
�
�
�4 N
-r----
"�
EXHIBIT C
� 3
�. Z
�
o �
� G
2
�
1"'�'
r
C
�
� �
� _
� �
w �
'V�' C
0
�
� �
rn
�
0
"v
o a
o �,
�
�•
� �
Z
�
�Il
0
EXHIBIT D
� �
� z
N
� v
� C
�
r
r-r
r
r
C
�
� �
� _
� �
w �
�' C
`�a -
44-� N �(�
� �,. �
� �
� �
�
��,,, \ I
� �` - _ ... �,,� .�� ;
w � � � �
o--- �-------- ; -r
� i ! i
.
i �
� i
f i , i
_ -_ � .
_ �, ,
� -, .
=.� � � i
=� i
;:� ----- --, -�-
,
%� , i
:�
,
i- :. ; �
//-%/ :: ; �
�:;,. ! �
/ � �, ' i
r//if; � � i
�"'" ' "''''''���%llllllllllll IIIIIIII�NII�I ,
% �
�
�
� I�II
/ I
/ // i ��
�rn �
�
0
'v
0 0
O �
�
_
�
u r''i
n N
u =
�� O
n o
u N
N y
�• � Z
� � �
v � �
� �
g N
� r
� Q �
r
r
N n
�
G
i�
l�
t-
V' �
i'
w,�
\�r
EXHIBIT E
:
�
� �
�� �
v
� C
�
r
I'T
r
r
C
�
� �
��'' _
� �
W �
� C
�
W e
i
_-----
0
�
�
44-50 N
EXHIBIT F
co
W �
I
_ — — — — —
0
�
�
�
N
�
s �
�, "> a €R c�
. ` � m � z
i ii �•a �
.__.
�� a
<�- � �
w w w w w � � � � �� c,+ c
w i�v' � c3' in ao � rn cs� a. c.+ o� �=7.
��
� `�'
�c �— x c� �+ m v c-a m� x� �
������������� ��
.�1�-��.1.�.�.l��w�
W N� O sG W V � GNf� ��
c—� cn �o t� -v o x c r�
� � � � � � � � � � �
i � �
.^ � �. i a � � � -i. .a.
EXHIBIT G
�
w
i
_-----
0
�
�
w
�
W
�
�
_�
,�
�
c�
N�
3
�w�w���������
w� ��,���,�.�wo
�c �— x c� � m v e-� w� x�
�
� � � � � � � � � � � � �
.�1#�.�a.l��..�1�«s
�++ c..� c� w c..� c..� c,a �
�i �'—�'' s�' oNo v rn vN+ �
c� cn ��o -v o= c r�
,
���������� �
�s
��������.�.��.
EXHIBIT H
5127214770 A7T WIRELESS SERUICE F-463 T-950 P-001
CeOular D'�visian
September S, 1995
Mr. Kevin Batchetder
C�ty of Mendota �%ights
1 IOI Victoria C�rve
Mendota Heights, MN. 5511$
RE: Atta�hcd letters
Mr. Batciielder:
SEP 05 '95 16:27
f8T Wireless Senr�ces
>15 24th Avenue South
inncapolis, MN 55406
12 727-1660
vc sia �2i-�no
Rccently, AT&T Wireless Services has received complaints from our customers ' and
around the Mendota I�eighrs az�a �garding the quality of our service. A number f thEse
complaints have come from residcats of Mendata Heights.
Dur'sng the caurse of those conversations, our Castomer Care representatives have� toZd
ihese peoplc that AT&T Wireless has an application for a new site undcr consider �tion by
rhe Ciry of h�fendota Heights. Yf'thcse customcrs asked what they could dv to help ec that
proposed site approved, the representatives informed the customers that a leuer af suppon
for our groje,ct had been drafted and thac they could sign that letter if they wisheci.
In your staff repon to the Council, you indicated rhat the City had received a Ietter
support for our project Attached are the signed letters from Mendota Heights resi�
would appreciaze your forwarding them to the Mayor and City C�uncil prior to to�
meeting aloag with any other messages that may have bccn received by the City.
Should you have any questions regarding the letters, I will be available to addre.ss
tonight's meeting,
Sincerely,
c�j
:�
;
:T' oLs n
Property Manager
attachments
V•�I.`f D...-..�I..J Y�_'�'
.I
s
at
6127214770 ATT WIRELESS SERUICE F-463 T-950 P-002
Mayar Charles Mertensotto
Cicy of Mendota Heights
1101 '�ictoria Curvc
Mendata Heighu, MN SS 1�$
L?ear Mayor
As a resident of Mend
syst�em, I am aware o€
tl�e freeway systcros t�
ar,c�ess chanr�els made
S�'NiCe COAhittl�S t01[1
Heights, who uses AT&T Wireless Services' cellular u
need far impraved cellulaz serviccs in Mendota, especi
�gh and azound Mcndat� I want improved qualiry and
ilat�le far my use as thc quantity af users, and popultarii
SEP 05 '95 16:27
along
#his
It is my nnderstant�ing that AT&T Wir�less Setvices has applied for a Canditional se
Permit for a ccll sit� iocated on the NW corner af I�ghway SS anc3 I494. I have n the
sight under consideratio�, and I belicve th� pole blends in well with the swroundin� light
poles and tre�s in the intersecrion. I think this is a�ood spat for this stiucwrc.
I strongly support AT&�' Wireless S�rvic�s' applicatian for this site, and ask that
all city co�cil meinbers vot� to appmve activation of this site. � need t�u.s scrvice
personal / busincss usE .., please votc approval to activate thc site now.
Very Ttvly,
�� � ;,:�..
i
- . . - � / . � ..�:..� _..i i.
.
/.�� — �
.
' • ' � i a �
i and
my
6127214770 ATT WIRELESS SERUICE F-463 T-950 P-003
Mayor Chaz%s Mertensotta
City of Mendata Heights
1 l0I Victona Curve
M�ndota Heighrs, MN 55� 18
L�ar Mayor Mertensouo:
As a resident of M�ndota Height�, who uses AT&T Wireless Sezvices' cellular
SEP 05 '95 16:27
system, I am aware of tiie nc�d for improved celluiar service's ia'Mendota, cspecia�tly along
the fi�eeway sysrems th�pugh arxd around Mendota. I want improved qualiry and ore
a,[:�ess channels made availabie for my use as the quantity of users, and gopu�ari of t3us
service continues to inci�easc;.
It is my undezstanding t�at AT&T Wireless Services has applied for a Gc�nditional Use
Pe.tmit for a cell site located on the NW corner of Highway 55 and I494. I have n the
sight under considerauan, and I beIieve the pale blsnds ia well with the surroun ' g light
pal.es and trees in the intersecaon. I think tlais is a good spot for this structure.
I strongty snpport AT&T Wireless Services' applicatian for this site, and ask that�ou and
all city councii members vote cc� agprove activation of this site. I need this service �Or my
personal / business use ,.. please vote approval ta actzvate thc sxte now. �
Ve y,
��
Name., �A�! � xa '7'",k'c1,P.�A.�..�
Address j � 8•5'" �ARt-'f Dr?L-E �G�
�,�rr�i�.� h�:�s.
Phon� #: � 5 � � '� � ��
�f G
612721q77g ATT WIRELESS SERUICE F-463 T-950 P-004
Mayor Charies Mert�nsotto
City of Mendata H�ighcs
I I01 Victoria C�uve
Mendota Heighu, MN 5S1 �8
T)ear Mayor Nlerte��.sotto.
As a re,�ident af Mendota Hei�hu2 who us�s AT&T Wireless_Services' cellular tels
syst$m, I am'aware of tf�e aeed �Oi' liripFBv� CBIiUIar SCNiCeS ui NiBnCIOta, es�t�ia.i
the fi�eway systcros thr;c�ugh and around Mendota. T want improved quality and n
access channel.s made a��i�able for my usc as the quantity of uscrs. and papuia,nty
s�rvice continues to increase.
SEP 05 '95 16:28
8i01�,�'
this
Tt is my understanding that AT&T W'ireless Sernices has applied for a Conditianal se
Permit for a cell sii� located on the I�W corner of Hi�hway SS and X494. i have n the
sight under consideratican, and I belicvc the poIe blcnds in well with tho surroundin light
poles and uees in the intersectian. I think this is a gaod spat for this stzuctur�.
I stronr,ly suppart AT&'r Wireless Serniccs' applicatipn for this site, and ask that y u and
all cizy counc�l membcrs voEe t0 approvc aciivadOn of this site. I need this service f c rriy
personal / business use ... pleas� vot.� approval ta acdvate the site now.
Very �
... ,Na.me... �s1__1_... `���i C_e,� .J,2 _. .._. . . ..,_... _ . ..
. . . _ _
:
Address 1 s��a. Sa; l�c!.. �
_.i�.1. �..it�t�aQ A- �� , � h} �S# } �
Phone #: ��' i L �. g' � �—
.. _ ._ . �
6127214770 ATT WIRELESS SERVICE F-463 T-950 P-005
Mayor Charles Mertensotto
G�ty of Mendota Heights
110I Vicwria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mayor Mercensotto:
SEP 05 '95 16:28
As a resident of Menda�a Heights. who uses AT&T 1�Virelcss Services' cellular te'• phone
system, I am aware of the need for improved cellular services in Me,�dota, especia�ly along
the fi�eeway systems th�cough and ar+ound Mendota. I want imprnved quality and more
accxss channels made available for my use as the quantity of uscrs, and popularity� of this
secvice continues to irtarease. I
It is my understandin� €hat AT&T Wireless Services has applied for a Condiuo Use
Permit for a ceU site lo�aced on che NW corner of Highway 55 and I494. � have n the
sight under consideradon, aiand I bclieve the pole blends in well with the surroun ' g light
poles and t�es in rhe intersecdon. I think this is a good spat for this scructure. I
I strongly support AT&T Wireless Scrvices' applicatian for this site, and ask that
all city council members vote to approve acavation of this site. I need this service �
personal / business use .., please vote approval to activate the site now.
Very Truly,
Name �48�� �L�l�9l�
Aaaress ' ig/ (�—�� (f�E' . . .
_�� �lh� ...���
Phone #. �/� ( r I� O{ V
� and
my
` ' I 61272Z4770 ATT WIRE�ESS SERVICE F-463 T-950 P-006 � SEP 05 '95 16:29
1Vi:yat' Cluc�ies Merce�is�atw
GG� af�ndota�iai$lcts
I 1�1 Vi+cicari�t Cruve
Mendom Height�, MN SS118
F���.-���-:, �•_t.+
As a rnsidactt of M�do� H�igh�s„ who uses A�'�tT Wi�leaa S�rvicos' �lar '
I ar,pt aware af;th� �acd for improved ae�tuiar savi�ra in Matidota, us ' ak�a8
e
ttorawsy syatr�ns thrtw and aro�,d M�dat�. I want impmv�ed quslih► a�
tr
#�oo�s d�t�3 � k f�r �ay �tso a� tht t�u�ndiy af uaera, �td �o��ri af thi,s
seavis� con�un� m u�au,
It ia axy un�d�atsndi�AT&T'Wir� Sr�vias 1ws applud fot a Use
Peradt fo� a cell �dte ' ou tha NW cosn�r of Highway SS a�td t494. I�va u� tl�
�iE�ht �andcr c�o�a�ti�aadon, aad I b�:lieve t1u�� �llasds ia wril with ths surraua+d�g �ig�
poles �ad �nGas in th�ee intrasecdon I�i�ic ' is: gaod apapt fr�r tluis �v�►r+c. �
� s�P�Y s�tP ort AT&T W#xele�s 5eivice8' 8p�kc�tiaa iwr ihu m�a. e�td asi� that
all d�ty �j(,, tnembecs vou to apprave sctiv��e*t'ptoa of this ai�c.�Ij ��utd tiva �:rt►uxi
�i WOY#i� I{7Y� � IIN paw++oY V41� �ii�Ei��i W WIi-�iV YW �i{� �{V�IM
� �c�y.
N' =G'�.ru4e�.at
Addriesac t6cr S. .�.t,�.'.v.► f+.. �««� -
...._
f,���a/�,� : �.�.� �_�^ ,�Cs'/��'- 36• �
Fh�a �li: �. /s - 6 �"'�P -or.��9 { .�e�r..
. � .�.._.
1fj•,.� .�d� - �'/
y�—al7� ��
�d
PLANNING REPORT
I7ATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATIQN:
ACTI4N REQUESTED:
PREPARED BY:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
Background
��conru�.arei7
COIvtSULTIiVG PLANNERS
LRi3DSCAPE �RCHITECTS
30Q FIRST A�'ENUE iJORTH
SUITE 210
MI�JriEAPG1LIS, 1VIN 35-i01
512•334�330Q
23 February 1993
93-03
Cellular One
880 Sibtep Memorial H:
Cpnditional Use Pernzit
PUDNariance for Heig:
Pole
John Uban
Cell One is proposing ta erect a cellular telephone transmission faciiiry on a site in the F
Business Park located along Highway 13, As explained in tb.e informatian furnished by
this site is neec3ed to provide adequate service to their customers. As the cellulaz phone
rnatured, there is a need throughout the Metropalitan Area for cellular phone transmissic
Cellular One has submitted detailed information about the health and safety effects af
facility which is shown ta be well withiu fihe federal and state standards regarding eie+
energy. The antenna pole has documentation to show its safe design. The proposed lo
to a NSP power easement and their taalc farm. To the east anid southeast af the site, b
facilities, Iie the single family neighborhoods of Cherry Hilis and Park Place. Also, e
the Ecolab Corpflrate Facility. -
rr Amended
of Antenna
�verwaod PIace
Cellular One,
�Ztiustry has
n srtes.
� transmission
�n�agnetic
ion is adjacent
nd the NSP
af the site is
The site is in an existing Planned Unit Development which presently houses the Riverpl ce Office
Building aud CDi Medical Facility. CDI does medicai imaging aad creates a magaetic eld which has
protective fencing azound the site. The proposed. cellular phone faciliry is located beyo d the influence
af the magnetic field.
The cellular phone transmission site consists primarily of a 75 foot tall mono pole with
antenuas Iocaterl on tag. A 12 foot by 28 foot brick building, designed ta match existin
the PUD, hauses the computer and radio transmission equipment. The pale is located tc
af the lat with a minimum 75 foat setback to the praperty Iines.
triad of
struc,tctres iu
�ard the center
'�' r CeltuIar One,Case 93-03 23 February 1993
2
. Since the praposed site is within a PUD, the site plan and structures and uses must adhere o the PUD,
" and the PUD needs io be amended ta accommodate the cellular transmission operation. Ad � itionally,
the variance for the height of the antenna pole needs to be reviewed.
PUD Amendment & CUP
The existing PUD has two buildings that front onto Highway 13. The remaining two lots
not have direct access ar visibility ta Highway 13 and have remained undeveloped. The :
a private loop road connection tluough alt four Iots with access to pazicing. Alsa, the sid
wirhin the PUD is designed to connect all of the sites together. The greatest affect this f�
have wauld be on che adjacent building tenanrs within the PLID. Landscaping and archite
campliance has been incladed in the proposed Cellular One faciliry,
The building azchitecture is designed to match existing buildings with a brick iacade and a
with sloging Soffit t0 matCh the existing• strttctureS.
The site is screened to the east by a raw of existing trees, and additional landscaping is prc
west side of the structure providing screening to the existing baildings. Aithaugh the adjac
has no specific proposed plans, the landscaping of the antenna pole and building should be
minimi.ze views from the sauth. The applicant has iucluded ghotagraphs shawing the positi
pole as it relates to views from Highway 13 and from residential azeas ta the east. 'The resi
have to Ioak through woods, several power Iines, and, in some cases, the NSP tank farm b
wauld be a view of the praposed antenna.
The PUD also requires a connecting road system and sidewalk system. The site plan as p:
not accommodate this and should be revised to accominodate the loap road, parking, and :
system throngh the sit�. This would nacessitate maving tha buiiding and the pole slight�y
Without the cantinuatian of the road system, circulation will be poor for the interior sites.
the FUD do
D calls for
�Ik system
ity might
,rai PUD
iot system
�sed on the
t vacant Iat
,cluded to �
E of the
;ntial areas
are there
�osed does
;walk
the west.
The praposed use would not interfere with the other uses within the PUD. The site is zon B-1 which
ailows radia and teievision tt�wers as a conditionat use, A technical point needs ta be co ed by
Celluiar One that their faciliry and CDI's facility in. fact do not create an interference probi m. An
additional 30 foot setback from the Cell One's site between CDI has been noted in their pl and
shouId be sufficient to minimize interference.
Several af the enclosed drawings sht�w the antenna and building in a different position on e groposed
site. The review of their development has been based on the premise that the large-scale bl eprint
drawings that zncluded landscaping were the current and more accurate plans. Cell One sh uld confirnn
the exact plan they are wishing ta have cons'idered for approval. `
Height Variance
The property has underlying zoning of B-1 in which radio and television tawers are allowe
cr�uditional use gezmitting process. These tuwers would narmaliy ueed to be substantzaily
the normal height allowed in the ordinance. The ardinance allows the height for a struct�u
feet glus 54 percent for variflus utiiities and add-ons. The tota152 and one-half of allowed
sufficient for the operation of a ceIIulaz phone transmissioa facility. The structure ne�eds a
line-0f-sight ta the receiver of the radio signals necessitating a height tall enough to genera
aad the varie�cl terrain in the area, For the praposed service area of the facility, a height I�
feet would be a hazdship restricting the ability to serve the public.
through the
ller than
tobe35
.eight is aot
� clear trees
than 75 .
9�
� *�^
� Cellulac One,Case 93-03 23 February 1993 Page
�t
- The photos enclosed show the views from the existing residentiai propertzes wquid not be im eded by
the instaltation af the ?5 foat anteztna.
Adion
Signatures of the adjacent Iandowners were not submitted and a pubIic hearing needs to be h�
Review the conditionai use permit and amended PUD with height variance request and make
recommendation to City Council. Coad:tians which IItay be cansidered are as fallows.
1. Ali activities which create electrical emissions shall coragly with the minimum
af the Ferieral Communicatians Camuussion.
2. Complete the connecting road system through the praperty to comply with the Pi
3. Campiete the sidewalk system through the property to compiy with the PLTD pi�;
4, Add additional Iandscape screening ta buffer the adjacent vacant lot within the P'
5. Confirm iu writing that the facility does not conflict with the operation of CDI.
6. The faciiity should only be used for the transmission of cellular phone conversati
Additional antenna requests woutd have to got throagh aa amendment of the con�
pernut.
7. Srreet �ighting to �e anst.�lted to pravide safe inngress and e�ress on the grzvate ro�
�
:
pian.
use
-- ---� --� . .. _ _ .
r
Jiz ly 12, 1995
i•
i
I
if
Mr Ted Olson
AT&T Wireless Services
2515 - 24th Avenue South
Minneapolis, 2�Il�T 55406
RIGHT OF ACCESS
Ga.s Lines 0203 & 0204
Sec 34, Twp 28, Rge 23
Dakota Couaty, Minnesota
Northem States
414 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, Minn�
Telephone (612) 3:
Dear Mr Olson:
This is in regards to our meeting yesterday, July 11, 1995, where
discussed that AT&T is going to build a structure aext to NSP's ea:
area for a gas pipeline. I approved that AT&T could use the ea:
area for access to the worksite. I also approved the right of �
over the easemeat area once a month for maintenance purposes.
Sincerely,
'� .
�
.�
JUDY S VIK
Senior Real Isstate Representative
Land & Right of Way
330-56I9 -
c Bruce Ansel - rIl1T DOT
0
Company
55401-1927
we
nt
nt
��
:��z`L.'�t�ZtL Ot
�r�iiii�iAi.� li1iQ,�i
:rTcc:trzoEogics
C:roc��
------
�:Ou«r.;:.t_r i. j �c?`�
t1r. �c,� ��nd�r�
Fer;cn�! �sner�! M�n�q�r
�.S. 'r'�es: �,a}lular
Cpua C�:cw�y, S�it� dta
�
�BC� :,rr,ct ncad E:s;
��J�1l1t3tCti?C'�, s�iliRBS�t� �:, }=3
�@P1 uf, �cJ1G�c''fS:
{ �;� ;vru„� Ea th�n�c ycu Ecr ; c�:r �ntin�� ��erc�icn fn �:rc•ricfng tf �e �st
i0 ,lC:t! S'c�i.a'i�i�(fi �t?Gf ;0 3XCl�S� �:Y $'.i�r�`ryi �Cf iLtli�''�f c�?�:iac �rC`Nii�1.
".s �rc �'�r� �r, L a r;.�� ;c s�: si;; .�~., u^ a; �q�n ; ace^�ir,q 9-' - f�r, r�r�encf c
��B:S �iG1 a�3 �i8:� Gi CSiitrtcf aSt'ft�. i�i2 �•i-i o`j�atec ir�oves t�:e i�r�
oCrll� v;i 3 wi'i i±i(;!i(i�/ �y ctx+�Iri1'� i�tCi �w �i$� «aiC�I1C�/ i�luii�.
;:ni;arc�s ;� �i rzQacl#i;y by �{lcNfng �_t•1 c�lis frcr,i ,tte s�ne, re�at�ies;. c# 1a
�v2�t��i:;�. 4t �ruvfr�s.t�ts.c:;crtuni��='cr c�-ric--sF�c: err;�r�ar.cy ra�r#iir�. ""'
Ycc�r �4;; 'o `e(� ;ccrts callui�r �•1-1 �;�s t� tha prcc:sr �ue:�c ¢afeiy ans�rpr�rq
�Ic�r �;,:���.�csr8 �..��;i �-i•i av�iiai�Giy i�zs �sn a signitic��r;t �e1p ta ru�{!c z�f�
�^�iCen tr�ii�;� State ��trci �isl;�2tc�t c�c�ter �ttsNerecf �bcsrt::;:•? c�ilul�;t g•1-1 �lL�
; ear, �s�( clsr 2,C£{i �i!s � rortth ara ;es�:cn�d ;o. ih�F ir�c.�asa I.r�fes �
�n sa{&c:g �si�;f2r t�ie�anes, an� ycur help in eau�tic:� yc��r ��cbs ,+ rs aE�ui
+14Q$(^} --i-t c�iis report�d �r�ergenaas iccat�d �w�y fron �;.•ren�vc�e! teieph�
n"2V$�i „C�G::L'S iit7t�. ''t ii� �^C�.^.��I� j Cf CBni!!cC a'c�CVlC3 .("'•.RIY:�::1°fli5 i�i8 L:ltIYa15<
a;�sten ;; rrcvic;a � r�ai usre�t ;o the �.^�r;�ur�ty.
�t nas ��en a�ia�sure •�ro�cing ;vith ycu to bring the �rt�iifa ai 9-S-f end cs(1.
�m�„�; �';ios �f �{ir,c;ssct�. Mlnnesc�a is praud �E cur ac�.+,p�is�rtent of ��te
a��orts �t evgn;�rai ; atawi�s :aitutr�r se�vic.� (a ae�r�c:ated �r.d enqutagsd
qrc��t� cf �cal(c;i�r ��rvica is �n !m!cor��nt �dun� to 4-i-4 er,:ar�anc� repocttng.
ia iur,�=f JGCI� �ff�7c16 to provid� khls s�rvir,a� lQ mar8 t�tinn����at�a.
s•r � r /
�,��{/ ��/J f' .
/f I�,�I � r y�,( J S_! J
� .r✓�
���„�
,;,11'ttBS t'. C�:' iOiS�,C;1Qt
SlQlf3 a•I-i it��dCt +�.'��iiEl�f3t
�
g�tllttrTZ' i {1C`=nt,3k)(��03 LiiYi^l�tt
� .
ml � '
m
Q_i-t aervic;
:�iS tfOtil �2Ii(::cF
Gi �:L'L�C a'c�7EY
�'ie`'.�:Sl�f 62CY'�
iaffne teE ixn�
. ., . �,. . ..
+i �f:� �C11Sa
(st i�F,�, t��
' riARltt. 't � is
ycur sL�s�
I •t. t��.�r,y cf
s. so �IIu(ar
cE t�e a-1-1
�r aervir,z Eo c�$
dd �•1-t. Yout
i'iie i:nlm��de�
1�'�� (a�k forwarR
� ..------------
O
r
FcDEFtA -L COt+,��rtUNiGRi'tONS- CGit+��tSSiUcf
• �r��Q QP�RRTtGNS 8tlRERU
Occa6er Z9� I°:'4
: i:.c c;zY G. :�.a s :cy
Dah�:e�a Sha�?n� aad Uba.. r:c.
30CI : �,rs L �•re�ue :ta; 4J
�t2LC� Z��
:t� :»aanal�,s , �'4 S54C1L
0
Dea= :::. '!ablcp:
:�.
i�v 4 - E� ��..
AOOM wlR.Y TO �
fi4s �adera L 8� r
3Ic Y. Raberc St�
Sc. ?suL. Y..N 55I,
�
Zn�
GeC
L
� a� -�r�4i�:.; ��. .-� ocse c^ �cc:� �. :eu:�l re;a=di,rg ?CC .:,ar.z�c�:ag c, ceI c-
SY
�� ?(IOQ@. QJ@_�C�.^.CS 3�.G L:� �:.C�C�B.C� O� �e�ares Q� CGCC3�G3 Oi ':C ��
�e.e�c� a:c� =c�e �T�cc.:o��.. z»�e4:a•::.�eac ec:::�ae�c.
;
� :e S_. ?ac::, -:.ai. : 0�=;�e, _ :.e?�. �ae_a�loc:s �c:.eac: C.z03} �,; c�e 3���su o=
4 :� .?���.�'.a� 'wQ.i�+�L�w �3.C�Oi"'...Si Ctiw��SS`�iQ�% 'i'��.�� �.i i�$iQir5.�,.Z�3 La%i .'��.St:►*'ri"'a�
CQ��:._o.".C� _»x �CS+� G� i.i.� C»C ►'. :31 r"'17,.�5 r'..�3C i.«.S �SS'.S"S dG�: ::S���S.
�� s�.sa �_a-r:.;.z a•ra_:.e�;r o= se�vi.ces a:c sg�ciaZ ass:s�a�c� ca r' y
� ye�sees a:ci :a c:a pub.:= . Ge�araL"E.ry�, .,.: c:e__ u a caaa:�.0 �ega�.�g a
.�v=siart, : a�:a. o� a.cae=:�� CC�:�s�..��e�rsec���brcaccasC=�g eac�-� �� �c�is �`g� �,' � • .. ,,..
_c Jec:ld 'oe �a�s�:_Yd :�: �� au: a�ice. ze �ur:.s�:cc:ac a� the S�. Pa L
r ie?c 0=,:;c� c�se=; aLL o� �: :�zescca aa� Na__� �akaca a.�ci �ar�iacs e= Scu :
�akaCa, x iscQ»s=: aa� 1�.: ::..ss�. Coco?a� :�s ca� �e .eg:sce:�c sictt c:s �iC�
�; �=La�czoc�e c: b;� J: ::: g acs� a��a at cse a:cve ad�+ress. .
t e aa» : �ca=•r�c �,e caca :a::..Cs ss : ittCe: �a.�»�e J.Git ctaae ���t:a�ax eaCe.
�az��ect eau:.�aecc _. c:�e i� �-z Ci.�f area vr =�yJitere vicfsiz t�e Iursdi�czo
o° oc; a`::c� as a rAsu? C c= ceLlula: g�xcae C�acts�zss:eaa. ih�s is ¢a
3c:-�==s=:g s:�ce �we _:eaue.^.c;es aa wh�ch c»e ceLs:sa� ayxcx:, :s I.:.czcsed �
aperace a_e LccaCed *"� c�e uLc:a �igh z:�qczncr (UcL) b�ad v:;:ciz is si3�:
�::c a:�' f�zgae.- c�za_ : a� io a=cf te'.evis ;.o� �p�ueaczea . i.:e.e ate reaci.veL
�a=� c�iZer eita^��Ia i; ckis °�eq�erzey �a:.bp fhich b:aadczsC prog=ar:.�:
:.zce.^.ded �oc :.::e g� :e.aL gc:a:i=.
,: hooe c�.?s aau�:s yocs; q4esti,ons, T� you need aay iu:c�ser irsFcc�a�;ce
coacacc �z� ac (�ZZ) Zg4-38I9,
sr �:ICz� oT'fi
���� r �
r�:`�+!:C . .:�T;:3C_, l;.
.. Pn: T:i C:13'^*+
.�
'(tllf : j
m
' .. . _� . ._. _ ___..._. ___ ...._, . ,
�
Hi.►� C�1 ' 95 �� 4�iPM DAKOTR WORi_UWIDE
0
f�
a ' �'
rosspx D. zw�x
ATi'QRNEYAT i1►W
4801 WESTlIriB?RF�T
scrrrs �os
st.o0lrSti+t�ii0i� M�'w SS{37
AAEtAC0�861s
1�.5['fiONB i.94t12t • PAX i35-1461
41
_ August 1, 1995
Mr. Max Thomp�on
Cellular One
7900 Xerxes Avenue Soutn
Bloomington. MN 55431
Dear �+1r. Thampson :
VIA FACSIMII.E
721-4770
At your request I contacted my client, i�tr. �iichael Chris
the owner af tite General Pump building at 1174 Northland
in �lendota Heights.
�pherson,
�i"iVt,
Mr. C1�ristapherson is out of tawn, but he is �amiliar wit -the
tower you have erected in the sauthwest quadrant of Highw y 55
and I-494. Ne has a�ked tllat I inform you tt��t he h�s no bjection
io the tower and w�ould support you in your application fa a
CQrtdition�l Use Permit with the Ci'�y of Nlendota Heights_
Piease �'eel free to call me if I may be of any further as istance.
Sincerely ,;
seph D. zwa
torney at L w
cc. Micha�l Ct�ristophersor�
General Pump/U.S., Inc.-
0
2��^Dw
2s�—a° � . .
�._�,. GIRCUIT RETURN GROIlND 8AR '
�cT-sazo i �
SMR FERd i� M �--____ ___________ i \
. BAT Q(C) '��{C) � = LAF-1 LAF-0 RCF-4 RCF-1 j RCF-2 j a
� ���__ (A} {A� (A) __� {A)��__ {A}�
'�- -
��_ + .
iv b
..
k �
w
i
� U
�i
8'-4" i, � o
,
a
. ---+-� s�
, ��-8i I RR p101 �•-y- o
r .���C� ��Q ` } �;_�� � z'_4� �
� � U
—!0 I �B) I � � � i ---^— �— Q
L«..___J
A� N� � � = AIF-1 �I AIF-Q
EMA •- � (A}I (A)
� NOiE 23
FLWR PIAN
F1G, t -
MENDOTA HEiGHTS �> MN_71
� . � . y��T?:i:�f•3iid�7
�
� SPACES. END qJAft�
4ENOTH QF FRAMES
� • ' SEE NO?E 7.
`. , � ' `� . Tl�E:3CE NO2
I SHEET 2 �s2
i �
, T— 6i�RR--K3—01
. . ��cc=
JAMES P. LARKIN
ROBER7 L HOFFMAN
GERAt6H.FREEOECL
JAMES C. ERICKSOM
EDWARD J. DRISCOIL
GENE N. F4JLLER
JOHN D. FULLMER
ROBERT E. 6Q1?E
FRANK3.HARVEY
CHARLE$ S. MOUELI.
CHRISTOPHER J. DIETZEN
JOHN R. 6EATf1E
t{HOAN. FISMER
THOMAS P. STOtTAVW
MICHAEI C. JACKMAN
JOHN E. DIEHL
JON S. EWIERZEW^KI
Ttt6MAS J. FlYtB-t
.lAMES P, dUiNN
TODDI.FREEMAN
PETER K. BECK '
GERALDI..SECK
J4HN 8. LUND4Ui57 !
DAYLE NptAN'
JOHN d. COTiER'
BEATRICE A. ROTHVVEILER
PAUL B. PLUNHETT
ALMd 1.. K1406W
Wt7HtEEN M. PtCOTTE NEYJMAN
MICHAELB. LEBARpN
GREGORY E. KORSTAD
GARY A VAN CLEVE • i
MNIEL!„ 80N1£S
SIMOSIiY J. MCMANUS
TIMOTMYJ. KEANE
ALAN M. pJJDER50N
QONNAI,ROBACK
MtCK4EL W. SCtiLEY
AR7tiU#2 S. BEEMAN
August 2 7, 1995
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1540 Nt}RWEST HNANCtA! CENTER
790Q XERXES AVENUE SOUTH
BLOOMtNGTON, MINNESOTA 55431-i 194
TEL.EPHONE (612) 835-3800
FAX (612) 896-3333
Mayar Charles Mertensotto
Members of the Ciiy Cauncil
Members of the Plantaing Commission
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
1101 Victaria Curve
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118
y�� ��
�� �
�
1
Re: Request for Conditianal Use Permit and Vaziance
AT&T Wireless Services
Dear Mayor Mertensotta, City Cauncil and Planning Cammission Members:
This letter is to explain the circumstances surrounding the installatian of the AT&T Wirele
cellulaz sifie at I-494 and Highway 55. We are submitting this Ietter to address same of the
have arisen during our discussions with City sta.ff and our August l, 1995, presentatian to t
Council.
iNN B. KREPS
RRENCE E. BISFlOP
�4A GRAY
.RYA RENMEKE
RISTOPHE1i J. lWiRi5THAL
UCEJ.UOUGtAS
'J.fAM C. GRIFFRH. JF2.
HMJ. STEFfEt#fAGEN
NtEL W. VO&S
nN a. wu
TEA J. COVlE
IUP G. ALDEN
:HAEIJ. S}diTt!
!S R. iNDE
7GHTN.HQLM80
dREW F. PERRIN"
4 M. MEYER
sBERICK K liAttSER RI
tRY 6. MANTIN
IE E BREMER
VEE L JACKSON
RISTOPHER K (ARUS
RGY R. KREISMAN
RtEL E. PlItOIA
dON E. 6CHF7AMM
:PHEN J. KAMINSKI
)MAS F. AR,EXAttOER
itEC T. KApLEC
U2HA A WAHLGREN
COUNSEL
JACK f. OALY
O. KENNETti llNDGREN
ALLAN E. MtR.LiGNJ
WENDELLR.ANDERSON
,wseaH Gms
ROBER7 M. KEiLfR
Services
;ues which
Ciiy
AT&T W�eless Services is the new nazne of Cellular One of Minnesota. Cellulaz One (no�v AT&T
Wireless Services) is owned by McCaw Comrnunications, which was acquired by AT&T (
earlier this year. As part of the merger of these corporaiions, McCaw is naw doing busine;
Wireless Services" in the markets where it grovides cellular telephane service. The City C
Planni.ng Commission will recall that a Conditional Use Permit was issued to Cellular One
e�sting cellular site at Interstate 35E and Highway 13. This cell continues ta operate as p�
Wireless Services' metropalitan area cellular system.
AT&T Wr�reless Services (AT&T) is licensed by the Federal Camrnunications Commissic
provide cell2iiar telephone service to the T�rin Cities metropolitan area. Cellular teiephon
became carnmercially available in the Twin Cities in 1984, and is growing at the rate of 4
users per manfih. Cellular telephane users include peaple from all walks af life. Particula
include the constructian, transportation and personal service industries and public safety a
as "AT&T
incil and
i 1993 for an
of AT&T
(FCC) to
service
00 - 5,000 new
y heavy users
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
August 17, 1995
Page 2 �
The cellular telephone system is made up of a series of "cells." Each cell consists of ce
the necessary computer equipment to receive and transmit calls, as explained in our Au;
application letter and supporting materials. (A copy of the August l, 1995, letter is atta
as Exhibit A for your ready reference.) Because each cell can handle only a limited nur
the number of cellulaz telephone users increases the number of cells must also increase.
presently o`ver 60 cells in AT&T's metropolitan area system.
Additional cells aze added to the system to increase capacity in areas where existing cells
overloaded, and to improve coverage in areas where reception is inadequate and needs to 1
most instances, cells aze added in locations where both capacity and coverage can be impi
time a cell is added the entire network of cells must be "retuned" to ensure that the new ce
interfere with existing cells, and to maxunize the benefits of the new cell. Retuning the s�
effort, generally undertaken over the weekend when cellular telephone use is down. Addi
generally added in groups of three to six to reduce the number of times that the system mi
AT&T has been working since early this year to add a series of four new cells to address
r antennas and
1, 1995,
to this letter
of calls, as
;re are
ve become
improved. In
�ed. Each
will not
em is a major
�nal cells are
be retuned.
and
capacity problems in four specific areas in the metropolitan system. One area of particular concem is the
area along and north of the intersection of Interstate Highways 494 and 35E. This is an are which has
generated a number of complaints of poor reception and dropped calls, an indication that b E th coverage
and capacity need to be improved.
AT&T engineers directed Ted Olson, Property Manager, to find a location in this area. T
procedure calls for the engineers to indicate an approximately one-half square mile area �
must be located. Mr. Olson then looks within this area for a site that can accommodate a
installation.
Mr. Olson's first effort was to inquire with City staff about locating on the Mendota
cell siting
;re the cell
.lular antenna
water tower
located north and west of Interstate 494 and Interstate 35E. Staff suggested that he present a"concept
plan" for locating on the water tower to the City Council. Mr. Olson appeared before the ity Council on
February 7, 1995 to discuss the possibility of locating on the water tower. He was advised at the water
tower was under renovation and the City Council would not be reviewing the City's polici s for locating
additional antennas on the water tower for six to nine months.
Because AT&T had an immediate problem in this area which needed to be addressed as s�
it was not possible to wait a year or more for a cell site in this azea. Therefore, Mr. Olson
search for an appropriate site. He eventually contacted the Minnesota Department of Trat
possibly locating on MnDOT land in the area of I-494 and 35E. After some discussion, t�
the intersection of I-494 and Highway 55 was identified by MnDOT as being appropriate
an installation. The site currently has a natural gas valve station and a temporary oil recla
on it. • � �
The process of obtaining the necessary approvals from MnDOT to install the cell site on
included many meetings and discussions. During Mr. Olson's initial negotiations with N
n as possible,
�ntinued his
�ortation about
current site at
r this type of
3tion facility
ir land
OT he was
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
August 17, 1995
Page 3
advised that the approval required from MnDOT would be a permit for the installation of
application for such a permit was prepared by AT&T for doing soil borings on the site. T
approved by MnDOT and the soil borings were done. The permit and approval is attache
this letter for your review.
During subsequent discussions with MnDOT, it was ultimately determined that AT&T wo
lease with MnDOT for the cell site. A lease was prepared and submitted to MnDOT for re
approval by the various departments within MnDOT and for review by the Federal Highw
Administration. The review process at MnDOT and FHWA took considerably longer thar
Because the lease had not been executed and returned by MnDOT at the time construction
Mr. Olson prepared a letter for MnDOT to sign authorizing construction to proceed pendir
ihe lease. A copy of this letter is attached as Exhibit C. It was Mr. Olson's understanding
discussions with MnDOT that the only approvals and permits he needed to install the facil
owned by MnDOT were from MnDOT and that the letter authorizing construction was all
required for AT&T to proceed to install the cell site on MnDOT owned land.
Mr. Olson has worked with dozens of cities in the metropolitan area as AT&T's cellular ne
expanded and is well awaze that the typical site requires building pennits from the City anc
if any zoning approvals aze required. However, this was AT&T's first experience leasing c
a cell site on land owned by the state of Minnesota. AT&T has constructed cell sites on hi;
department land in other states where local approvals were not required. The only similar �
AT&T has had in Minnesota was with their site at Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airp�
on land owned by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC), required only MAC app
would like to emphasize that the only reason AT&T did not apply for Cit3- approvals for th
because Mr. Olson understood from his discussions with MnDOT and AT&T's experience
and at the airport that only state approval is required to use land owned by the state of Min
Following the approval from MnDOT to proceed, construction of the cell site was comm
1995. By this time, two of the other three cells due to be activated with this site were co�
ready to be activated. The scheduled date to activate the four sites and retune the system
1995, so time was important.
Construction of this cell site over the weekend was not unusual or out of the ordinary for !?
of contractor availability, traffic/transportation concerns and the need to avoid disturbing t]
business operations of landlords, it is common for AT&T to install cell sites over weekend
the three other cell sites scheduled to be activated with this site were installed over weeken
new cell site in the City of Roseville installed the weekend of June 3-4, 1995; a new cell si
Plymouth installed the weekend of July 8-9, 1995; and a cell site in the City of Afton, loca
existing structure, installed the weekend of July 22-23, 1995. The installation in Mendota
weekend of July 15-16 was scheduled between the Plymouth and Afton installations, wher
would be available.
tilities. An
is permit was
as Exhibit B to
enter into a
N and
anticipated.
was to proceed,
; execution of
�rom his
ry on land
hat was
work has
review to see
- constructing
. T'hat site,
val. We
project is
� other states
3 on July 15,
�ted and
July 28,
T&T. Because
�e normal
��. For instance,
�is, including a
�e in the City of
�ed on an
�eights the
the contractor
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
August 17, 1995
Page 4
Construction of the cell site continued and was approaimately 99% complete when the Cit
work" order on the site on July 20, 1995. Following the stop work order, AT&T contactec
Administrator and made arrangements to close up the site so that it ���ould be in a safe con�
City's concerns were sorted out. Although construction of the cel] site is approaimately 9!
no further work has been done at the cell site since the stop work order was posted, and A"
activated this cell site. T'he remaining three cell sites were activated on July 28, 1995, and
been retuned to accommodate them. AT&T has been able to minimize the impacts of this
but is anxious to bring the cell on-line to improve coverage and capacit}� for its cellular tel�
customers in this azea.
The preceding narrative, although long, is intended to help the Planning Commission and
understand how AT&T finds itself in the position of requesting a Conditional Use Permit
a facility that is 99% complete. As we have told the Council; we understand the City's cc
situation and regret the misunderstanding which resulted in this situation. If the Planning
Council have additional questions, Mr. Olson and myself will be at the Planning Commis
hearings and will do our best to answer them.
� posted a "stop
the City
ition while the
% complete,
&T has not
:he system has
`dazk" cell site,
variance for
n about this
amission or
and Council
It is our hope, however, that the Planning Commission and Council can focus on the merits of this request
for a Conditional Use Permit and vaziance. Although installation of this cell site commenc d without City
approvals, it is iri a location which will have a very minimal effect on surrounding properti s. The neazest +
residentially zoned property is approximately one half mile awati�.
We have been requested by City staff to apply for a Conditional Use Permit, a height varia:
monopole to which the cellular antennas arz attached and a setback variance for the equipn
which houses the telephone switching equipment that drives the antennas. We have applie
Conditional Use Pertnit and variances as requested. However, we do not believe a setback
required. The equipment building is located approximately 35 feet from MnDOT's proper
MnDOT properry abuts an abandoned right-of-way of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul ar
Railroad. Highway 55 is on the other side of the railroad property. The zoning ordinance �
sideyard setback of 30 feet, or 40 feet when "abutting street." Since the MnDOT property
railroad, and not Highway 55, the 30 foot setback applies and the building complies with tl
requirement.
We are also not sure if a height variance is necessary. In 1993 we applied for a Conditiona
and height variance. Although the City Planner recommended approval of the height varia
the planner's February 23, 1993 report is attached as Exhibit D), the Planning Commission
that the correct approval was a Conditional Use Permit allowing the monopole at the requii
essential service structure. This Conditional Use Permit was approved by the City Council
Public Works Director's memo to the City Council and the Council Resolution approving t
Use Permit�are attached as Exhibits E and F).
We have applied for both the Conditional Use Permit and variances, although the Planning
and Council may want to consider whether the variances are necessary. We believe the sta
:e for the
nt building
for the
ariance is
line. The
Pacific
quires a
�uts the
setback
Use Permit
ce (a copy of
ietermined
:d height as an
(A copy of
�e Conditional
�ommission
dards for
�
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
August 17, 1995
Page 5
issuance of a Conditional Use Permit and a height variance are met, as set forth in our AL
letter submitting the application for these approvals. A copy of this letter is attached as F
reference. �The Conditional Use Permit and variance standards are addressed in pages 4 ti�
letter. Please note the typo at the top of page 6: "In this instance, a variance is requested
ARE practical difficulties... ."
Mr. Olson and I will be at the Planning Commission and City Council meetings to show
Commission members and Council Members the location of the cell site, a number of pic
the monopole from surrounding properties and roadways, and some graphics showing pr
landscaping. We will also discuss fizrther the standazds for the issuance of a Conditional
variance. We will be happy to answer any questions at that time.
Thank you for your taking the time to read this letter. We look forward to meeting with
hearings.
Sincerely,
�i.Q�Jt ����
Peter K. Beck, for '
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd.
kvv
Enclosures
cc: Max Thompson
Ted Olson
Tom Lawell, City Administrator
Jim Danielson, Public Works Director
John Uban, City Planner
0129510.01
ist 1, 1995
ubit A for your
�ugh 6 of that
;causethere
Planning
�s showing
Permit and
at the
�
Cellular.Division
August 1, 1995
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Pianning Commission
City of Mendota Heights
1 IOI Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
RE: Variance and Conditional Use PermizApplication
Essential Services Structure
I�ighway SS & Interstare 494
Honarable Mayar, Gouncil Members and Cammissioners;
�
This letter accompanies an application for height variance and a Conditional Use
construct an essential services structure and equipment shelter on pro�erty owned by the
Department of Transportation (MnDO'T�.
�T Wireless Serv�ces
5 24th Avenue South
neapalis, MN 55446
�21-1660
612 721-4770
ta
The request is being amade in the name of AT&T Wireless Services. MnDOT has consen 'd to this
. applicatian and is in the final approval sta�es of a lease agreement with the applicant for a ortian af their
praperty lcacated at the northwest intersectian of Highway 55 and Interstat�; 494. Docume ts required by
the City of Mendata Heights Zc�ning (7rdinance (including drawings and surveys of the pr perty)
accompa.ny this letter,
The Proposed Use.
The sit� would be used by AT&.T Wireless Services, one af anly two campanies
licensed by the Federal Cornmunicatians Cammission (FCC) to pmvide essential cellular
services to the Twin Cities. The project includes a steel man�pole with antennas attached
equipment building {located at the base of the pole) to accommodate cellular rad'zo equipn
The site is at the santh east corner of a portion of IvInDC}T Right af Way between
railroad tracks, adjacent to an NSP valve station, and a.jet fuel scavenging facility used b
This sgecific site was chosen based on the following criteria.
;
• AT&T Wireless Services' customer needs ... defzned in terms of poar c�uality and
* Non-interfering existing users on the property (see attached Ietters of approval fro
• Natural screening afforded by many rnature trees west af the site
� An e3ci�sting "clearing" which wiil allow us to preserve all af the major trees at the
have been
it and an
Koch Refinery.
w capacity
existing users)
The site is contained within a 34' x 44' area. We normaliy restrict access to the bas af the
monopole and the building with a chain link fence (as required by the City). Landscaping ill be provided
according ta City ordinance and MnDC}T requests. A site plan and drawings of the project ccampany this
application.
,r���
_ Recycied Paper
Essential Services Structure
Highway 55 &. Interstate 494
Page 2
Th � 1tlonopale.
The monagole provides support for cellular antennas and related ca�ling (inside the
to connect the antennas to radio equiprnent inside the shelter. The pole is constructed af st
self-supporting, a.tid is painted dark brown to blend with surrounding trees and the existing
poles in the adjacent freeway interchanges.
The pale is I25 feet tall, and is consistent in height with the surrounding highway
(which are 104 to 12$ feet tall).
pole� necessary
1, is completely
highway light
poles
The pole has been engineered and manufactured by Valmont Industries, Inc. af Va ey, I�Tebraska.
A ietter fram Valmont is attached ta this application detailing the ri�id eng'rneering and safe standards ta
which this monopole has been canstructed. We will pravide additional engineering data as required.
Equipment BuiZding.
The equipment buildin�; is 12' wide, 28' Iong, and 11' high. The exterior finish is �
aggregate. This shelter was moved from our site at the College of St. Catherine's, and was
them as meeting their requirements far aesthetics.
The building hauses radio, computer, and climate cantrol ec�uipment for this site. T
powered by NSP (using normal 120/240 volt, single phase, AC electricity}. It wiIl be coi
AT&T Wiseless Services' mobile switching center via traditianal telephane lines. No wate
brought to any of our 80 sites across the state, since no people are present at our sites on a
There will only be occasional, brief visits (average of about ance a rnonth, for 1 to 3 hours
routine maint�nance. Fire protection is pravided by OSHA approved Haion inside the shel
sarne type of fire protectian insta7.led in most airplanes in our nation). Equipment inside the
produces na noise, srnoke, fumes, giare, or ador.
Antennas.
Antennas attached to the monopole will transmit and receive FCG-approved radio ;
carry voice and data i�etween the cellular system users and AT&T Wireless Services' cent�
physical size of the antennas varry depending on capacity and quality needs of aur users, r
mariufacturer are determined by our radio engineers for optimum service tc� this area. The
pole are about 7 feet Iong and IQ inches wide.
The area in which cellular coverage is needed largeIy defines antenna height requi
needed quality and capacity as our system rnatures. Naturally, surraunding topography,
buildings also p2ay an important role in arriving at agpropriate antenna height. AT&T Wi
engineers have deterrnined that antenna height necessary for improving cunently unaccep
and capacity at this locatian is 125 feet, based on antenna direction and "same-channel int,
beLween this and our own neighboring sites at the International Airport, Maplewood, Inv�
Heights, Eagan, and MendQta Heights. '
�y
� eqwgment is
�ected to
or plumbing is
aiiy basis.
�er visit) far
:r (this is the
;nals which
switch. The
type and
�tennas on this
ta provide the
s and
;ss Services'
e user quality
Grove
Essentiai Services Structure
Highway 55 & Interstate 494
Page 3 _
The Celluiar Phone System.
Users af cellular telephane service include members of the �usiness eammunity as
public sector. Commuters, doctars, salespeaple, business owners and executives all bene
cellular phones. Additianally, cellular telephones are used extensively by fire, police, and
safety ofixcials and departrnents. The systexn allaws police and others to conduct discreet c
in the field, and enables direct communicatian with individuals in need of assistance even �
traditional telephone is unavailable.
111 as the
by using
�er public
nmunication
en a
Cellular phone users can cantact "9 i 1" to report accidents, fires, or ather emergene es without first
having ta search for a telephone. Mr. 7ames R. Beutelspacher, 9-1-1 Praject Manager for innesota,
wrote that "the unimpeded grawth af cellular service is an important adjunct to 9-1-1 emer ency
reparting." His letter is attached for yaur informadon.
Cellular is a law-pawer system. The amount of energy generated from a single
channel is typically about the saume as a 100 watt light bulb. This is less energy than is
typical cardiess telephane which is used in many hom�s today.
Interference Issues.
The cellular phone system operates on a spec�c set of channels licensed exclusivel
Wireless Services by the Federal Communications Comznissian for provision af high quali
service, for the beneixt of the public good. The filtering of spurious signals is very zightly �
srandard radio eiectroruc flters. Celluiar telephon�s aperate within a strictly regulated set e
frequencies between 825 and 84S megahertz (MHz) for transmit and hetween �70 and 890
receive. AT&T Wireless Services is currently licensed to aperate in over 100 major marke
with hundreds of antennas. There has not been any instance af television or radio int�rfere
All AT&T Wireless Services sites must be operated in accordance with our FCC lic
cellular service in this area. Mr. .Albert S. Jarratt, Jr., Engineer in Charge of the St. Faul F
Field Operations Bureau of the FCC canfu�med that the FCC has nat received any complaii
interference by cellular phane transmissions with home electronic entert�inment equipment
five states in which Mr. 3arratt's office has jurisdiction. His letter is encit�sed far your inft
The Ceilular Grid.
by the
to AT&T
� mobile
►ntrolled via
allotted
ZHz for
nationwide
ce reported.
�e to provide
3 Office,
of
any of the
Celluiar service provide,s subseribers with highly gortable phone service by develo ing a grid af
radio cells arranged in a geograpktically hexagonal pattern. Each "cell" is created by antenn which serve
as the link between the customer and the system while the customer is within that particul cell. As
callers move fram one cell to the next, their calls are autamatical2y switched, or "handed of ," to the next
cell's antenna site based on the strength of the signal between the rnobile and the cell.
Each cell can only handle a finite number of calls at any one time. As the nurnber c
increases, tt�e grid must be grown ta handle the increasing number af calls. This means tha
must be created within the same geographic area, resulting in a new grid pattern of smaller
need for better cellulaz quality and more calling capacity is now needed by our growing sut
this location. Accornpanying this Ietter is a baokiet that more thoroughly explains the cellu
custamers
mare celLs
:ells. This
�criber base in
ar system.
.
Essential Services Structure
Highway 55 & Interstate 494
Page 4
While the area in which cellular coverage is needed largely defines the required ante
topography also plays a role in arriving at the appropriate height for the tower. This is true
cellular telephone signals cannot travel through large structures or through the earth.
One of the keys to cellular engineering is to take care to design each cell to be the prc
cell is too large, it will interfere with the operation of neighboring cells, and callers will hear
conversations or "cross-talk." If a cell is too small, some areas between cells will be left wit
service and callers will not be able to use their phones. If a caller is in a valley or if a hill lie;
caller and the cell's antenna, the area acts as if there is no antenna at all. When topography c
play, cellular telephone service can be both difficult to provide and frustrating to use.
height,
size. If a
�out any
between the
�mes into
Cellular engineers now employ the use of directional antennas in an effort to accom odate the
topography and surrounding structures. By increasing / decreasing the elevation of the ante as and tilting
the antennas up or down, the cellular signal is "controlled" to cover hill tops and valleys wi out increasing
the cell's overall size. Indeed, this is the technology employed at this particular site.
The Conditional Use Permit.
Section 19.2(3) of the City Zoning Ordinance provides that essential service stru
conditional uses within an"r' Industrial district. In considering an application for a Coi
Permit, Secdon 5.6(5) of the Zoning Ordinance provides that the City shall consider the
• The effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, and welfare of occupants
surrounding lands. .
There are no occupants of this site or the property on which it sits.
There are also no residential properties adjacent to or in the immediate
vicinity of the site. The surrounding lands are all zoned for industrial
or business purposes. The communications facility proposed is designed
to serve those types of uses, as well as the general public. Providing
improved cellular telephone capacity and coverage to the surrounding area
will have a positive impact on the surrounding area and present and future
businesses in the area
• Existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adj
The cell site will generate approximately one maintenance visit to the site
per month. The technician visiting the site will pull onto the site off of an
existing curb cut along Northland Drive. There will be no parking on any
City smeets or any other adverse impacts on traffic conditions or parking f
• Effect of the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan.
The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for industrial uses. The cell site
is consistent with and serves this type of use. The use is therefore consisten�
with the Comprehensive Plan.
are
al Use
nng factors:
I streets.
Fssential Services Structure
Highway 55 & Intersta.te 494
Page 5
The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare
; community. .
The cell site is located in an area of the City zoned and guided for industrial
uses, at the intersection of State Highway 55 and Interstate Freeway 494.
The site is perhaps as far from residential development as is possible within
City of Mendota Heights, and will not be detrimental in any way to the heal�
safety or general welfare of the community. To the contrary, providing imp
cellular telephone coverage and capacity will be beneficial to the community
• The proposed use will not cause serious traffic congestion or hazards.
As indicated above, access to the site is via an existing curb cut from a City
which will be used approximately once a month for maintenance purposes.
• The proposed use will not seriously depreciate surrounding property values.
the
AT&T Wireless Services has installed over 80 cell sites throughout the state
In no instance has there ever been any evidence that a cell site has caused an
depreciation of surrounding property values, let alone seriously depreciated
property values. For instance, AT&T's current site just east of Interstate
Highway 35E and Highway 13 has had no impact on surrounding property �
values since its installation two years ago.
•. The proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this ordi�ance and the
Comprehensive Plan. �
One of the purposes and intents of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehe;
Plan is to provide essential services to the public, including communication
For the reasons set forth in greater detail above, a cell site in this general loc
is necessary to provide adequate cellular telephone service to this area of the
and surrounding areas. Allowing the cell site to be located here, subject to
reasonable conditions, is consistent with the purposes and intent of the Zoni
Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
The Variance and Hardship.
The Zoning Ordinance allows a height of 45 feet in the Industrial zoning district, w ich can be
increased by 50% for certain uses. In order to provide adequate cellular telephone service t� this area of
the City, particularly in light of the rolling topography in this area, it is necessary to have a 25 foot pole at
this cell site. City staff has therefore directed that we apply for a height variance for the pol .
Section 5.5(1) of the City Zoning Ordinance provides that:
The Council may grant variances from the strict application of the provision
of this Ordinance and impose conditions and safeguards in the vanances so
granted in cases where there are practical difficulties � undue hardships in
the way of carrying out the strict letter of the regulations of this Ord'unance.
Essential Services Structure
Highway 55 & Interstate 494
Page 6
In this instance, a variance is requested because there are no practicai difficulties in
antennas located at the maximum height allowed by the Ordinance would be ineffective in �
ce�lular telephone coverage to the surcounding area. The situation is similar to that of a wa
which must be placed at a height sufficient to provide adequate water pressure and water se
community. '
�
�
The Zoning Ordinance goes on to provide, in Section 5.5(5), that in considering ap
variances, the Council shall consider the following:
• The effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the c�
See discussion above under Conditional Use Permit.
• The effect of the proposed variance upon existing and anticipated traffic
air, danger of fi�, risk to the public safety.
See discussion above regarding traffic impacts. This single pole and small
shelter building will have no effect on light or air to surrounding buildings.
Nor is there a danger of fire. The pole is constructed of steel and the shelte
building of concrete, and the building has an internal halon fire suppressior.
system. With respect to public safety, we have submitted to the City Inspe�
Department the engineering specif'ications and construction inspections of d
facility which confum that it has been built to all applicable safety standard;
We will also fence the facility if the Council feels that is appropriate.
• The effect on values of property in the surrounding area.
See discussion above.
•; The effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
; See discussion above.
The antenna pole has been designed and constructed at the minimum height necess;
adequate cellular telephone service to the area served by this cell site. As the City Planner
his February 23, 1993 planning report on AT&T's existing cell site in Mendota Heights (c
communication structures such as this monopole normally need to be substantially taller th;
height allowed in the Zoning Ordinance. This is because the cell site needs to maintain a li
receiver of radio signals and therefore must be at a height tall enough to clear trees and the
the area. A height less than that necessary to provide adeqaate cellular telephone service w
hardship restricting the ability w serve the public.
cellular
• tower,
ice to the
for
light and
� to provide
inted out in
y enclosed),
the normal
of sight to the
ried tsirain in
1d be a
�
Essentiai Services St�ucture
Highway 55 & Interstate 45►4
Page 7 ,
�8I'lC�l2Sl8It.
This ietter and attachments should serve to explain our agpfication and to answer i
your ordinance. If we cazi be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me at 612-8
ather regresentatives af our Company will attend Planning Commission and City Cauncil
address any additional questions you may have. AT&T Wireless Services appreciates the
we have received from the City Staff, and we look forward to working with you to better
in this area.
d
Thank yau for your cansideratian.
Sincerely,
�----�'�>�
Ted Olson
Property Manager
TQ� ;
Enclosures
{
,
,
rec�uired by
'42. I and
ngs to
ance that
the public
� MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
4�• ..�
� � APPLICATION FOR PERMIT,.FOR INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES Control � C
OR FOR PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS ON TRUNK HIGHWAY Section �_
�1. : �
Prepazed in Triplicate. Forwud or deliver all copies to proper �� Districf
Distnct/Area Maintenancx Of6ce. • - pa,
CELLULAR ONE
612-844=674
BRAUN ENGINEERING I 683-8'
Surface to bc disturbed ❑ Gravel Q Concrete
(check one) ❑ Bitum. (� None
T.H. County , Municipality
N/A I+ DAROTA MENDOTA l
Intersecting T.H. at: (tiea to land or street lines)
NORTH OF I-494. WEST OF HWY 55
Size and kin of pipe �- I Depth i surface
/� /�
No. and �i e of excavation� ,
ork to atart on or after Time requi
.TUNE 1 . 1 �1�5 1 T�.
[f detour ia neceaeary, deperibe rerouting
. . k��kl �J�
Permit'
No.
251-5 24th Avenue South,
I Nature of work
Ia shoulder to be disturbed
❑ Yes � No
Street or Ave.
wo
to
n or
nneapolis, MN
g►ve L1C5 D}� SLaL10 , or
struction
Is traffic detour n cess�
I—I Yes
lines
No
I, We, the undersigned, herewith accept the terms and conditions of the regulations of the Commissioner of ransportation and agree
to fully compiy�therewith tn thc satisfaction of the Minnesota Department of' Transportation.
Furthermore, except for the negligent acta of the State, its agents and employees, the applicant or his aR nts or contractor shall
assume all liability for, and save the State, its agents and employees, harmless fTom, any and all claims r damages, actione or
causes of action arising out of the work to be done herein and the continuing usage, constructing, reconstr cti g ining and
asing of said utility under this application and Permit for coestruction.
� Applicint's �
Dated....P�iX_.23.�._�.295.----------• Signatnre....far._.C�LI�IIL&R_.AN�-• --- - -- ---_-------------- •
�._ _ .. _ . . ,. : .
SEE BEVERSE SIDE AUTHOitIZATION OF PERMIT ME—S-95-220
FOR REGUI.ATIONS <PEB�[IT NO2 Y�LID UNLEBS BBARING SiGNATURE AND NUMnER) Per �it No_________________._..__..
- -' - •- - - - -
his '
In consideration�of their agreement to comply in 311 respects with the regulations of the Commissionz; of Tran portation cuvering such
operations, permission is liereby granted for the work to be done as described in the ahove application, aid work to be done in
acc:ordance witli special precautioi�s reyuired as hereby stated:
,AS PER ATTACHED PLAN AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
�
It is expressly understood that this permit is conditiuned upon replac;ement or restoration of the trunk highw
satisfactory condition. It is further understood that this permit is issued subject to the approval ut local
authorities tt`aving joint supervisivn over said street or liighway and subject t�� the 3pplicant's compliance witli t
nf tl�e Minnesota Environmental Quality Board and any other affected governmental agen ' s
� � �� � . � � . MINN DEPA T ENT
..,:...;. _ _ .. ; ,
White copy to Applieant �� � �9 �
Green to Foreman •• t Dated.._�.�d�..Authorized----_ __ •-_
Pink to DistrictJArea htaintenance En ineer �'��' � �
g " Aut orized Sit
The date when work is completed must be reported t�� DistrictiArca Mainten:incc Enginec
Return thia portion when work ia completed:
No Deposit Required ------------------
For Deposit in Amount of j .................. Required and Attached Hereto.
District Cashier'a Check No ......................... Or Certified Check No...__........
Use Only Thie `Depo�it Made by — Applicant ..............
•-----Name ��--------------
i pr
' Party Doing Work ................
i----------------•- -Name
to its original or to a
y. village or borough
rules and regulstiuns
I-KANSPORTATI ON
:ure
I qo 9 ._
Perm t Nd'!.�% __.�.�.'� ..��`��
Dnte work completed ...............................
•-••-•-••••• BondlVo.---------------
.............•----•••••--•••• ...._.1......._..
Address �
.................. ........••••.... ....._..
Address
� • .�. � - . -- - - EQI.AI�(ATidlr
. -� - -� -- -
�•. .° This application form shall bc-usesd:fo� installatiort of utility service �connecaons that danot-cross the T
f: -� � for miscellaneous guys and•anchors art� for ptacing tecaporary obstFuctions on tho right �uC way. •�,n-;,.. .
•�• •� U�ility applicationa for•overhead and an�erground installations.snd extensions thaeto,shal}be made on
.. nbrt�itte� tu .ihe Utilities�and:Agreements�yineet, Room 706, State Transportation. Building for_issuancc.
.. .{uired in ad�ition to Form 252�5-Revised,-:-=- �--� =- •-- • -
' .?C
... . . ' PERTINENT REGULATION3
_ ��
- 1. Fla�s, tiare� and• barrieaded�•�hall be erected to protect trdfic and pereons. (Par. 1?07.)
, .
2. Traffic to be allowed to pa�i and Lo be protected at all tirnee, (Par. 1707, 1-1708.)
• (s) It it ia not pouible'to allow traffic to�pas�, a�uitable detour munt be pro�ided. _
• '1. Reference: Par. 170?—Diversions of thru traffie—apecifieations for highway� eonstruction.
• 3. Barricades to be ezected in a mannez which will prnvide auitable visibility in all dincttons. .
4. It blaatin� is necesaary� precantiona muat be ezercised. P:r. 1709—Spec. Man. (Uae of ezpio�i�es.)
••' • 6. If work to br done lic�-within s municipality or platted to�r, permiaaiom m�at be obtained irom such
Q. E:cavationa must be cribbed �vhen necessary, depending upon type of aoil, in order to,pre�eat cave-i
• 7. Iv'o �ny� or itaqs to be att�ched to trees on trunk hishway ri�ht of wsy. • •
'• 8. Under�rouad construction muat. be �a- constructed • aa not to_ harm or unneceasarily destroy the .ra
oraamental treea. •
PEitTINENT REGULATION3 •
Roadwa� •
�'
.. • L Installation of pipe under concrete or hi�h type of bituminous pavementa to be done bp jac.3dn� or borin
-' 2 When trenchinQ acroea surtaced roada� materisl ezcavated must be piled eeparately. , .
-�- ' a. �� �dl'll buk-i'�Ilin�'mnst•be•plaeed ia 6"_layera-snd thoroughly 4mped and mate=ial must be flush and e�ei
�whea finallT in plaoa - �
. t'� If pavement or rosdwsy is damsged� aame shall be reatared to •�riginsl condition.
.� , • .
, Concrete pavement to be replaced accordin� to Stste specifications.
�
•- 6. -If aettIement.occnrs•�or ezesvation'csves.in so:that.repiaced-materisl.+.settle (bituminous mst or concre
zeatored to it� ozi�insl iwndition. . .
`'••- •?' � No po]e�snchon, anehci�� brue�-or other conr.truction� to be put on roadway ehoulder, ezcept by petmi
�''�=& • No drivin� on to hiQhwaq fzom ditch or•driving ori�"s�onlders achere damsge will occur.
-•'�'= �:' ' When an initallation ii made•by jukia� or borine, a pipe or casing of larger dimenaioa muat be uaeti to
.. ... . . � -
. . . •• � :. • - • -
LIMITATION3 - '
'''I. �No lu�a shall ce aaad on equipment trsverain� road which will damage the road euzfice. •
R. �"itoadude ahould be cleaned� up iiter aork ia completed.—Par. 1.411—Page 1409. �-' •� -• • •-
""'•'• �"s.'" If Departmeat of Transportatioa shall make aay improvements or change on aIl or any part of iu R/W upon, ov�r, under �
' '• aad in every case the appllcaut Aerein named sLall �aftec notice from the Commisaoner of Transportation. or his authoriz
`"�' `•-• chaage, vaate or remwe from trunk highway R/R+ said worka necessacy to confoan with said changes without cost ahatso
sota. '
.. � .
'•• 4. - Dtainage on'to TA. R�R► shali be doue under Pcmic No. 30795 available at.the Disaict/Aru Mainteaance office. ,. ,
� �'••6. '� No �work aluII be done wbich will create�a nnivace. - . .- . - . . .
•'`�=6.'...Atter �vork on a•psojeet;it completed.ssid Peiaons• doing such wark�muat notifp the °Maintenance En�inea
-_ =� �`ii beinQ dotie fhaL inch'w►ur1C"has'beeir+oompleted' and.•ready. for: finnL inspection si�d. acceptance• by .the.
� � ••� :, . �` � . • � . _ .
"-' ''7.' -CuttIn� and- t=imm3'ifQ bi'tsee�l�ithin tbe� zi�ht-of-�vsy aad �remoral oi zesultine stumpe requise .prios a
Dis authoriud sepre�eatsti�e. .: • "
•- JTE:• A certified check or bond msybe.requiced to insure psoper restoradon of highway snrfaces and to cova payment fos
snce properey. .
. .
snk Highway roadbeds,
�orm 2525 Revised and
Eorm. 1??3 may be re-
9
qaQe, to.ra, or cit�.
�rowth of si�htty. or
with the road• surf:ce
e baae). same.shsll be
authoiization. , • � "�••
ncase the service pige.
r.along the highway, then
d agents proceed io altec,
ver to the State of Minno-
in •�vhich districb work
�tste oi Minnesota.
protal ot •ansiaen or
damage w highways or
�J �
6
i
THIS PE�IT IS APPRQt��EI} SUBJECT T4 THE F4LL0'4V"II�TG
This permit, I4TE-S-95-220, authorizes the appiicant to work on MN
way as shown on the attached plans and according to the fallowing ;
ITIONS:
► right-of-
i provisions.
4
The applicant or its cantractor shall notify Lars Impola, MNlDQT Road�
Regulation Engineer� at 582-1447, at Ieast 48 ,hours prior to starting consl
State inspection may be arranged, and for approvai of aIl highway mater:
their placement. The total installation shall meet MN/DOT specification�
{ ,
�
The applicant shall provide in-house in.spection at all times while workin�
highway right of way,
No material shall be deposited on the traveled roadway.
All personnel working on MN/DOT right-of-way shall wear
,
t�on so
prior to
.� � �.
safety vests.
The applicant shall fiunish, install and maintain all required traffic contr devices
according ta Appendau� "B" of the Minnesota Ma.nual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices, dated November 1992, while performing the cc�n�truction autho ' ed by this
permit. '
Any speed reduction shall be in accardance with MN/DOT "A Guide to
Speed Limits in Highway Work Zones" dated Jan.uary 1994 or as amenc
zone speed reduction mu�t have priar approval from this office at 582-1�
It is expressly understaod that this permit is issued subject to the applict
compliance with the Rules and Regulatians of the Minnesota Environme
Council and a.ny other affected Governmental Agencies.
, �
;
All areas disturbed during construction within the State right of way sha
to origuxal or better condition. AII turf areas, disturbed during canstruc�
sodd8d or seeded. I� seeded, MN/DOT Type 500 Seed and Type 1 Mu:
Anchoring shall be used.
,
The applicant shall replace, in kind, ali bituminous, concrete, curb and
sidewalk disturbed by the construction authorized by this permit.
a
�
The agpiicant shall grovide for protection of pedestrian tra�'fic while
construction authorized by this permit. .
i
a
i. Work
7.
,� -
�l Quality
be restored
� shall be
1 with Disc
, and
�
p t �
The applicant is required to preserve all e�cisting survey monuments. If �MN/DOT
deternunes that monuments have been disturbed or destroyed during co truction
activities, the applicant shall accept fi11I responsibiiity for atl costs incu ed
in the re-establishment o� the monuments.
It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to utilize the "Gopher State One Call"
excavation notice system as required under Minn.esota Statute Chapter 2 6D, 48 hours
prior to performing any excavation {Phone 454-0002 Twin Cities Metro Area or Toll
Free 1-800-252-1166) .
�
The environmental integrity of MN/DOT Right of Way shall be mainta' ed at all
times and aiI in place drainage shall be maintain�d and not disturbed.
All tree tri�miming or clearing shail have prior approval . of this office at elephone
number 582-144�. All plants or trees removed or damaged shall be rep aced in kind
by the applicant. � �
The applicant or his contractor sha11 notify the permit o�ce at 582-144'
inspection. � . �- �,, � � .
. ;t ,,�,�, ,: � - � � - �, '
..
;,
• i
f
e
f•
1
4
0
FS
�
n
. �.
EXHIBIT C
.
•'t. "
Cellular Divislon
July 14,1995
Mr. Karl Rasmussen ,
Minnesota Departrnent of Transportation
Office of Right of Ways and Surveys
Room 511, MS 6
Transportation Building
395 John Ireland Boulevard
St. Paul, NIN 55155
RE: Approval to construct on MnDOT Right of Way
Pending Lease at S.P. : 1986(494=393)901 Parce1218 (attached)
Nir. Rasmussen:
BI�
61
, ,
Per our telephone conversation of this aftemoon, the Minnesota Dep;
of Transportation (MnDOT) hereby agrees to allow ACC/McCaw Cellu
Minneapolis and/or their assigns to proceed with coristruction and
installation of a cellular antenna site- (the Project) on the above referer
properiy as shown on the attached Exhibit `A'.
T Wireless Services
; 301
) Xerxes Avenue South
�mington, MN 55431
831-3531
612 832-7731
MnDOT has reviewed fihe Project, consisting of the installation of a st
cellular monopole, an equipment shelter, and installation of electrical
telephone cabling as needed, and with the exception of final review an
of the project by the Federal Highway Administration (if needed) has
approved said Project and grants it's authority to construct and operatel
; ,
ACC/McCaw Cellular of Minneapolis agrees that it is proceeding with
construction with the understanding that if said approval of the Feder�
Highway Administration is not granted that, upon notice by MnDOT,
ACC/McCaw Cellular of Minneapolis will immediately cease construc
•and promptly undertake to remove any completed installation.
of
� .
ACC/McCaw Cellular of Minneapolis agrees to indemnify, save harmi ss,
and release MnDOT from any claims, demands, and causes of action fo
injury or death of persons or loss of or damage to pioperty occurring o the
premises which is in any way connected with ACC/McCaw Cellular of
Minneapolis' use and occupancy of the premises and has attached a Ce 'ficate
of Insurance evidencing coverage of and for the Project.
_ _-' Recycled Paper
�
�
��
Agreed to this 13th day of July,1995.
Minnesota Departmeni of Transportation
+ ,
,
; /� r%
BY• ,���' j�./�L SG2LClSs l�_
Its: ���E.e� /Z`G(/ �rit�i f �
0
• j
i
�
r
ACGMcCaw
�
of Minneapoli: �
0
;
4
EXHIBIT D
�
�
t`.CORt`K� ;i�:••
' CQNSULTiNG PLA�INERS
LAVDSC:�PE ARCHITECTS
3{?t} FIRST .��•'Ei�,'t3E :�"?R � i-?
� SUITE 310
' �ti1ItiIvE:�POLlS. YI:`' :+;.l�ii
� t L•3.i4� i.>OU
PLANNING REP4RT
a
DATE:
S
CASE NUMBER.
APPLICANT:
LOCA?TON:
ACTiC}N itEQii3?STED:
PREPARED BY:
PLA.I`TNING CONSIDERAITONSt
Bacltground
23 February 1993
93-03
Cellular One
880 Sibley Memarial Higl
Canditional Use Permit fa
PUD/Vaziance for Height
Pole
John Uban
Cell One is proposing to erect a cellular telephaae transmission faciliry on a site in the Ri�
Business Pazk located along Highway 13. As e�alained in the infarmation furrushed by C
this site is needed to provide adequate service W their customers. As the ceIiuiaz phone in
maturetl, there is a need. throughout the Metropolitan Area far cellular phone transmission
Gellular One has submitted detailed information about the health and safety effects of the
fac�ity`which is showa to be weIi within the federal and state standards ragarding electroz
energy. The antenna pole has documentation to show its safe design. The proposed lacatic
w a NSP power easemeat and their t.auk farm. To the east and southeast of the site, beyoz
faciIities, Iie the single family neighborhoods of Cherry Hills and Pazk Place. Also, east c
the Ecalab Corgoraie Facility:
Amended
�f Antenna
� Place
Qne,
kas
is adjacent
the NSP
the site is
The site is in an existing Planned Unit Development which presendy houses the Riverpla Office
Bui�ding aad CDI Medicai Faciiity. CDI does medical unaging and creates a magnetic fie which has
protective fencing azound the site. The proposed cellulaz phone faciliry is locaterl beyond e influence
af the magnetic field.
"The cellular ghoae tcaasrnissiaa site consists grimazily af a 7S foot tall mana pola witlz a 1
antennas iocated on top. A I2 foot by 28 foot brick building, designed to match existing ;
the PUD, houses t]ze computer and radio transmission equipment. The pole is lacated tow�
of the Iat with a minimum 75 foot setback to the progerty lines.
.�
i af
ctures in
the center
� Cellular One,Case 93-03 23 February 1993
2
Since the proposed site is within a PUD, the site plan and structures and uses must adhere o the PUD,
and the PUD needs to be amended to accommodate the cellular transmission operation. Ad itionally,
the variance for the height of the antenna pole needs to be reviewed.
PUD Amendment & CUP
The existing PUD has two buildings that front onto Highway 13. The remaining two lots
not have direct access or visibility to Highway 13 and have remained undeveloped. The
a private loop road connection through all four lots with access to par}:ing. Also, the sid
within the PUD is designed to connect all of the sites together. The greatest affect this f�
have would be on the adjacent building tenants within the PUD. Landscaping and architE
compliance has been included in the proposed Cellular One facility.
The building azchitecture is designed to match existing buildings with a brick facade and a
with sloping soffit to match the existing structures.
The site is screened to the east by a row of existing trees, and additional landscaping.is prc
west side of the structure providing screening to the existing buildings. Although the adjac
has no specific proposed plans, the landscaping of the antenna pole and building should be
minimize views from the south. The applicant has included photographs showing the positi
pole as it relates to views from Highway 13 and from residential areas to the east. The resi
have to look through woods, several power lines, and, in some cases, the NSP tanl: farm b
would be a view of the proposed antenna.
The PUD also requires a connecting road system and sidewalk system. The site plan as p
not accom.•nodate this and should be revised to accommodate the loop road, parking, and :
system through the site. This would necessitate moving the building and the pole slightly
Without the continuation of the road system, circulation will be poor for the interior sites.
the PUD do
D calls for
�Ik system
ity might
ral PUD
�ot system
�sed on the
t vacant lot
cluded to
� of the
:ntial azea_�
�re there
�osed does
;walk
the west.
The proposed use would not interfere with the other uses within the PUD. The site is zon � B-1 which
allows radio and televi�ion towers as a conditional use. A technical point needs to be conf ed by
Celluiar One that their facility and CDI's facility in fact do not create an interference proble . An
additional 30 foot setback from the Cell One's site between CDI has been noted in their pl and
should be sufficient to minimi�e interference.
Several of the enclosed drawings show the antenna and building in a different position on th proposed
site. The review of their developm�nt has been based on the premise that the large-scale blu print
drawings that included landscaping were the current and more accurate plans. Cell One sho Id confirm
the exact plan they are wishing to have considered for approval.
Height Variance
The properiy has underlying zoning of B-1 in which radio and television towers are allowed
conditional use permit�ing process. These towers would normally need to be substantially L
the normal height allowefl in the ordinance. The ordinance allows the height for a structure
feet plus .50 percent for various utilities and add-ons. The tota152 and one-half of allowed t
sufficient for the operation of a cellular phone uansmission facility. The structure needs a g
line-of-sight to the receiver of the radio signals necessitating a height tall enough to generall
and the varied terrain in the area. For the proposed service azea of the facility, a height les:
feet woul,d be a hardship restricting the ability to serve the public.
-ough the
r than
be 35
!�lt IS IIOt
� clear trees
than 75
Cellular One,Case 93-03 23 February Z993 P�ge 3
The photos enclosed show the views from the existing residential properties would not belimQeded b;�
the installation of the 75 foot antenna.
Action
Signatures of the adjacent landowners were not submitted and a public hearing needs to b�
Review the conditional use permit and amendetl PUD with height variance request and m�
recomaiendation to City Council. Conditions which may be considered are as follows.
{ �
1. AIl activities which create elec.trical emissions shall cornply with the minimum
; of the Federal Communications Commission.
! �
2. Complete the connecting road system through the property to comply with the
3. Complete the sidewalk system through the property to comply with the PUD p
�
4. Add additional landscape screening to buffer the adjacent vacant lot within the
5. Confirm in writing that the faciliry does not conflict with the operation of CDI
6. The facitity should only be used for the transmission of cellular phone convers
Additional antenna requests would have to got through an�nendment of the cc
' permit.
7. Street Iighting to be �nst311ed to provide safe ingress and e;ress on the private
A
�
held.
plan.
use
-
\ ���� �� ,�
.i �, .Y '
�� 3� �,
� � a� j f ,
��•'"`',` �'•/`�
�;,'�/ ��i` *•: : �
Sn� j � �''j � �
� ,,.� � .
�,�- � ..� ..
,.
,� � .
,� �-�u� � �
� �, .; �'� i! .^a��,,,'q'�!
.�, . . �... '4�t �'=an__t'9r�e
�/ / �,`!� '�' ""���► ��
/ ' � �
✓ .�*"%"`''� •� j��� �
. • ,:-�`'� ,�� ��� dP"�`',di
.�-`- �� � �
♦. � � '��,
, -= �►,,. , i��. ` ��� "' �
� ...- !!� = l�� 'm '', ; � �
, _�.- Y'`�_:Ty ,�. ,�a �i. � �:.: �r
� _ � '� �� � d f� r'
,.� . ��"Q_ 3 �
'' :�---'" �;��' �qr O., f Si � � �;1M / ,� -
. � .�=....�.. p!'�.`.q,'Q �,o ;Q��'�'1�► /
en�! r��'l�r�ipr.:•O► �ip ��►�.�4���'�:�'j �`� cs�
, �'-•'��i�` 4!s - 'q►�v ;;�"�!d►'4 0 � i�'!
,���,�'1 �1ip �a. ,� ,} �
r o � � �ra�� �: , r o�
Qpi� �,de •� 'rue°�o►.:t�''!�► 01 �:�►'► � ��'�
:. � � ii�' , i�
�'�,►'��...""...�. �?' '�'� `' h e, �. :�::''�tL .�',
A ;�aQoao p '� o'�o_� t�,,�i ,
��� r�Q ��� �4 4� � �
�� '"�' +�,,,,,,,�!!t!!►�e ,.a► s�t�, pe ' �z -� ,t r .
�0,1�►p,eoo d ,�? ,�,,,ep ,, �-�►� i
�
S!!!!!!!!!!�!! 4'' 1�' ,�p!D�� �,�. ; � : c°�„iil
�o'-..,�.v.""'..:�....e..ses�e�. C� �'� :.�,, �� - q�D
��v�v�����ir'�°r, Q , � �' s � � ` ., � �p :.�
�o►-arO;Q,�i'Q�i'�' ��d: � d�=�
TO ��� � �. , � �
4 ,d'"rrr�,es �". ,
��1 �''' '"�
e �'0�' ��`�► sa►.e! � :....:. + �� �I
� ao�'�p'Q��4i �' �!d'�M s,� � r'—=��� �. ,d,►�
�=ai°'rv'a,Q!'��.�.�°'��,��Q��e',�t�„v 'sa' - � � ;1�,�'"' !!
� ;v,. C"� ' •►�
I� otp► ,p�t�=�pi��r � .O► _. ; rd � ,�"� ' � ,� �
0 Qpp o►- ����i 11 ; ,�' ��4
9 C: �� �'0�4� �' � ����� t. �� � �
r Cj�jj � `�
�T� ` �'?� '`� ' y � V� / , ,������ +�
•r �
��� ,,.,.��� ry, ;�� ,:' 'i� F:�►=
�°'�OQpe'0► �'�" ', �js'et°'T°��'a� ' S
=v ` �`'"�`„r' �
�p � �Q�'�' �o � � ,r ,�,� :t�l�.*���,�a=�V��! _�,;:-�[
C'v �'/ !! �jv�-��' •, . - �x_•�,�►���
�0 l�:: �� �. ��• �► �; --�i '';�
vt �Ar�en .� �►1y �'
e E ► � � O � ,o• ► ►���d►�i1t
ee,��''es;�1i!!'�i /'.�a:.v�. :����
.., . ��:-�ss �' ;
��.-,r' .. N
— — — a — 7�
. . .,» . . 3 —
. '�;','.-,.�tiC �: .
.1� f�•'��.'�t.� ��.
y ��•'• �
\ � -'?`�?:ti :C.'s.� - - — •• -
�.,'�f.�: :-:
� n�: �'::.�:; Nca,er.vE' n� -
+ . .�..Q. � „� .
�/rlaf--,� O Oe�c� . •�:.,- �: ��:�
,� �v ; .:,� :.'�::;.; ;. ST.4 TE S PO E f � �G'o�/
' �.-o � •'-y ..� �X�:� � �:
2 Ac o� ` .,,� . : �,:; �.
r� - �::'' - �. : , - .
' ai�1-{3i �• : �••.,�„ �e
. �,�: �'�' � :' -:�� ::;:: :• 2 6 004 - A
� + ';:�,�:. .w94?+1"'si►hYC�;e� :•: .'�
�, :.•.s . .�fi'P+.+'��, _..0 3
: ���'' �.`
� � g, :•:::�.Y:.,...;:;,;,, .��� �h� . SUBJEGT P OPERTY ��n
�i � �: �'i -�,,� :•�.. :: •• ::, ��� + ..
.:�;,:�'••.: :°c:: r�;��;- : ` �: j : PUD �
6 � •: •.': . : : : ��: � �t C!t� � •�
/ ��c' `� �: ��: �; --,r'��.���;.�:.•. :�: .:;.•:: - . � � NO
� ::;;�t::::::=�.<.� ,.: -��: RTH
�: � �;.:�-: ::::::. ��
�1, �, :.',�:��c�:�`�r:: ;�'� ::::::::::::::.:.��=�..."' �t SCALE '1 "= 00'
� O * �;: :;:,� •r,. :.; .:. � : : :•��.,:: ;b,ttllC:�;:�•:�.,. :.:. :}: +�.� _ _ - .� / � - - - • - '
: ws r_ f y.�. �:: d '� 0 U T L
. � ;�.::>.::: :.�::: ::::�� :�=::::7...:��::� :=:::.::::: :� ,* a T
:•;:r: �-„r`w`•-�-.�'--.'�,.;�ti� ti::r•,- '}
�y .'�: ; : . �.' : . •. •�': :tY ��' • ��� ��
:::;.•., . n�o. � -
� �Z' x� r r. ,� ':, '' •:-:.: �•:•.,;:� •.. `�'::W=:•:;::: �'- - ti.
� . ~"� t ~ 1: : l.• .': �" � �}
�'; � •4.�}� • • �.L•:�'}}'�L'�-,'�,+•J{ ��.�f � f
tft t-03 �:�w ; �+: {s : ;i: • :t��• �
�~ t .�� �361��
`� � ro
�, , = t fi2 9 4 �.►
t ia.oz o f- �
4 ` • � T � -� a�',
� ; 8 sz A� z 1
..1 \ � � fl `' �� �.if
a°'a � � 1 _ � � � '�''jg? 6C�
� V� ` � ' � � �V.�i r��
� ` ` t ' j � �' / t-
� � � � O I � O �. «� � ,;,' 6 t! ;
�
. �a�- / .
` t "� �', �✓i�.E-' TiS�'E' ./1/ '..S •Ti$ TE' S � i 7 { a W �'.
' � �O yv E.E," G+O • �
� �_.. , � / /q+C. ' +D ? � Q.
�c �
/ �\�� � • 1 7 i. �
c �' ., �
� . .>
a c g �-� ;
��- f 4��� tTi
%� - Cf �
,� g ? .�
� �,r,� , - 17! 6:
, ,;�; � , s77.Q5
D
���s 2l.00 9- ,e�; / f77�gg �
•.> 3�g A� . 1 � 4 i Q G s: � ? D- -
� ( Z � �.'o N r
� ��� � o �� �' m .
z.6ca �c - ' _
' -- - 3�s ' 6 � �C;
� �t 9l9.'. wts� N.�P'ti?'Oi�. "J29.1I � ���t�2
, SL
�' � ' � � 4 5
I rv►acz�e. lc�ivEsTrjc�..rz�z- co- P 3
` A!'Z 'T µ!J R Ft .�15 M Lt 5 5 E. N Fla �
z.6oa9 -.q tb ,� BLU F ClRCLE -�-• -- �
{ �1 =
� 1��g�G_ ;' =,�,� �
t��t �
r v � D
� ' 410 - O 5 Ui �, `' .<- T.
_L ��
♦ ( = �' � c
� \ tY` ^ -- --
: � � 8
\ � \ i y ,�v� t
,
. ;
�
�
EXHIBIT E
n
;
T0: �
�
FROM:
SUBJECT:
i
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ia► •
February 24, 199
Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
DISCIISSION
James E. Danielson, Public Works Director
GASE N0. 93-03: Cellular One - Conditional Use Permit
for Amended PUD - Riverwood lace
Messrs. Bill Strub, land owner; Warren Dunlap, Cell lar One
and Peter Beck, attorney representing Cellular One, appeare before
a hearing at the February Planning Co�nission meeting to re est an
amendment to the Riverwood Place PUD. The proposal is to a low the
construction of a seventy-five foot (75' ) high mono pole antenna
and a small�equipment building on'one of the interior UD lots
previousl_y approved for an office building (see ttached
application materials). There was no audience present at the
meeting. _
The Planning Commission's ma.in concern for the project
centered around providing for the possibility of a future 1 op road
and for eliminating the need for a variance. Cellular On agreed
to provide an easement as needed for extending a loop road through
their lot. The Planning Commission felt that the ante a tower
should be approved as an essential services structure, hich is
allowed as a Conditional Use under the B-1 Zoning District in lieu
of granting a height variance.
;
RECONIl+2ENDATI ON
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to re
approval of an Amendment to the Conditional Use Permit of R�
P1ace�PUD allowing the construction of a seventy-five foc
mono pole antenna and equipment building according to tY:
submitted and dated January 29, 1993 and the grantin
Conditional Use Permit allowing a seventy-five foot (75') m�
antenna to be constructed for an essential services struct
conditioned upon the following:
ommend
t (75`)
� plans
� of a
�no pole
ure all
.
. ;
; '
1. That an access or driveway easement be grante to the
' Cellular One site from the Riverwood Place Ph se I PUD
site over the currently paved driveway exten ing from
Trunk Highway 13 to the Cellular One site and th ough the
' Cellular One site to accommodate any future need for Lot
2.
That an appropriate turnaround be providedl on the
Cellular One site for public safety needs.
That landscaping be completed to the landscap�ng plan
submitted and dated February 23, 1993. �
That the following City Planner recommendai�ions be
complied with: �
� a.
c.
All activities which create electrical 'ssions
shall comply with the minimum requirement of the
Federal Communications Commission.
Add additional landscape screening to bu�fer the
adjacent vacant lot within the PUD.
Confirm in writing� that the facility c�oes not
conflict with the operation of CDI. �
, . d. The facility should only be used or the
� transmission of cellular phone conver ations.
Additional anteana requests would have to go
; •�thro�gh ariamendment of the Conditional Use Permit.
.� � .
treet lighting to be insta�led to prov'de safe
��� ingress and egress on the private road.
"�� . That the tower height be limited to seventy-f ve feet
( 75' ) •
ACTION RE4IIIRED
Discuss the request with the applicant and then if Council
desires to implement the Planning Commission' s recommendati n, pass
a motion adopting Resolution No. 93- RESOLUTION ING Z'HE
RIVERWOOD PLAN PUD AND APPROVING A CUP ALLOWING A SEVENTY-F FOOT
(75')� HIGH ANT�NNA TOWER AS AN ESSENTIAL SERVICES STRUC .
�� .
,
f
�
.
1
r
�
;
4
�
;
5 :=:}:
, •� ;
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF DAROTA )s.s.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGI3TS )
i
,I, Rathleen M. Swanson, being the duly appointed and
City Clerk of the City of Mendota Heights, do hereby CERT
�
the 'attached Resolution No. 93-13, "Resolution Amend
Riverwood Place PUD and Approving a CUP allowing a Seve:
Foot (75') High Antenna Tower as an Essential Services Str
is a true and exact copy of said original Resolution on fi
office.
,
i
f
� Signed and sealed by my hand�this 8th day of March, 1993.
;
I�"athleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
a
acting
CFY that
ing the
�zty- �`ive
cture",
e in my
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA CODNTY, MINNESOTA
RE50LIITION NO. 93- 13
RESOLIITION AI�sNDING THE RIVERWOOD PLACE PIID AND APPROVIN A COP
ALLO�PING A SEVENTY-FIVS FOOT (75' ) HIGH ANTF�NNA TO�PER AN
' ESSENTIAL SERVICES STRIICTDRE
�HEREAS, Cellular One has made application to end the
Riverwood Place PUD to allow construction of a seventy-f ve foot
(75') high antenna and equipment room on Lot 1, Block 1, R'verwood
Place in lieu of an office building; and
W�RE�.S, the Planning Commission reviewed the prop sal and
conducted the appropriate public hearing at their February 3, 1993
meeting and reconunended approval of the amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights City Council
proposal at its Ma.rch 2, 1993 regular meeting.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of 1
of Mendota Heights that the Riverwood Place PUD be amended
- the construction of a mono pole a.ntenna at a height not tc
seventy-five feet (75' ) and telecommunications facility a�
to the plans submitted and dated January 29, 1993 and aF
Conditional Use Permit allowing the seventy-five foot (7�
antenna as an essential sezvices structure, all subject
following conditions:
5.
the
he City
o allow
exceed
cording
prove a
') high
to the
That an access or driveway easement be ranted to the
Cellular One site from the Riverwoo ace P as I PIID
site over the currently paved driveway extendi g from
Trunk Highway 13 to the Cellular One site and thr ugh the
Ce1lular One site to accommodate any future needs for Lot
2. �
That an appropriate turnaround be provided
Cellular One site for public safety needs.
That landscaping be completed according t
landscaping plan submitted and dated February 25
the
the
1993.
That all activities which create electrical 'ssions
shall comply with the existing minimum requirem nts of
the Federal Coimnunications Commission and as it may be
subsequent amended.
Confirmation in writing that the facility do�s not
conflict with the operation of CDI.
�
e
,•
. , 6. That the facility only be used for the� trans �ssion of
cellular phone conversations. � Additional antenna
requests would have to go through an amendme t of the
Conditional Use Permit.
7. Roadway lighting to be installed to provide saf ingress
and egress on the private road subj ect to staff pproval .
� 8. That the tower height be limited to seventy-fi e(75').
,.
9. The color of the mono pole shall be of a sin le color
' matching the color of the existing Mendota Heig ts water
, reservoir.
�
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 2nd
day of March, 1993.
CITY COIINCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA
$y Charles E. Mertensotto/s/
Charles E. Mertensott
Mayor
ATI'BST :
�
thleen M. Swanson
City �Clerk
.,
� 1 ,
� `
� FROPOSE
>
., � • ,
r � � �.. -
� �x�
� t �, �
� r'� �� �
�_ � � � Mo r
885 �IVE
. �
`�
D --Il-�___�_DS CAPE PLAN
i�p—� F��'t�L,,�
�� `
�� o '
.� �
c�tntuN�c ,�� �
��
. � _,
►�/� vP�� � -
� �� �
����
1 —_--�
�5� 6' COLORADO SPRUCE �
\ � b �---
�
�YE STaTION
� 1 �
, — 3a�
S�
• ��A•1h
y
•
��
r
E
�
��
�, � P� k
�•, �
X
�tr Q�.�� 0
�1 r �
x
� �
��� - .
�(12) 3'-4' R�D DOGWOOD '�-�
A 5�a ' � ��J � o �.
� � �
� �
� � •
►� � � x W
. � �,� �•
.
. _
�-
. �� i ��� • .
r - ,' '��,'' `-1
._�� �
.
•
�
7=
, .�
13
_ g� 1 �—
869 —.
— g 67 ��
865 �
�1�� �� 2 0 ' a6� .
� / 8� 4.
x � s�6� ��
�� � :�:��:�.
t 4 f a�;
. . '�'1-. ..
�
;�
.
S�- �
�,. ,r . ' R�F � . _
rv ,
� - _ . . � _�„ . . •
, ' . � � �
� '�-� � , ,�. ♦ '�. �
F��'� `i�i: 1' �-, ` �r� '.' , .� i' ,� �� +.
' �. � �i• � � s
I � ,�_.. ,. � - .
. � �
, . , �,-- �
.ai � `" ' .� a 4r �! `� � i.•
�� ,
�� • R � R
y �'� ..-t . �:
�<'�_ ' �i 1
. C,r,�" r-
� _ � .�:'` < ` .
i• � �,'T�3€"'-�� ,• r ' (
I�,y��� �+ ' � w �� } �� ' ��
�1, w �.' _ ��T-;r1r-�i� _ � �' 4��
.is..- � ,
� ��� � F
. .-. i+ � � ' ' � � �:' ,, �
Y'����'' s- � " _-.} � i � ,
I .' � " ��� � .
�V r F �� !
��'• y �-I' . _•n•� � _ . .
���� �� T '�":�r . . 1
�a�� ��'' �^' � —_. I _ _� _
j
.:
}._-a �-S - -
i � � � ,� � --
� .- �� s.�`. .; �� '-....1i
i' ' � �V � , �� ' i
, .vr
r '�� f �.� ;
�- ' l " ' "
-� - -
I'�t �� ��, y K � j 1
•� " �+�r�' � � �� � •
:---�'�-��.� - � E
.-. _ . i �
��. �� •I �.� '
�. `?�1F L � �-� . , ♦, ' ` . ` {�.
r �. ! ��.
��=�—r. �_� `'�� � � .
IN' . "� ' •�?� �le— ` ;..r � .
N • ' - �yr ,
�....
� — , �r .,�,yj –�-- � —
! . _ . .,_
j Y
!
aYf 5� `"
. i���
'-� � _y1`. '
• - - •,k.�"'s�'
- _ .'�54�-�. .
_ +�'i�
-x -
' �
�' � � , .. . �� ��� �
����� 1'O P�' �
� Ji �ii.
► ri"�'� �
�♦.♦ 1,�f:��I..
+S,�''����•�i��i���1.I��`� ,
�����������i� �, . . �
I-.�- - -" 3; : _ �
4 �
, �' 1
' . . . � � �i 'Wi{
� . . _ . . . . � . ,RorG
�—
�'
S�NT BY�M1�1/DOT R/W AND SIAiVEYS: 8-16-95 : 12�00 : � �12 �52 89�0:# 2/ 3
Mlnn�tote Departme�t ct T�anaportatlon
..�„ , .
TfanapaNatio� Huilding
395 John I�el�nd Roulevard
Sainf Paul. Minnesota 55155-18gg
Au�ust 16, 1995
Mr. J'sm flanielsoa
Duector of Public Works
C�ty of Mendota Hcigbts
11Q1 Victoria Cu�re
Mendcta Heights, MN SS118
RE: S.P. 198� (494=393) 901
Parce1218
At N.FJ. Quadrant of T.H. 55 ia Mondota Heighu
Temporary Construction Permit and I.ease Condidoas
AT&T Wiroless Ser�►ices
Dear Mr. Danieicon:
This letter will serve as a follow-up to the telepbone conversation yau anci I bad rel
captioned matte�r on. July 21, 1995. As you ara aware� ATBcT Wireless Services has
with the Minaesota Department of Transportation {Mn/D4'1'� over the last tbree a
atterript to secure a twayear kase for the cvasttuctioa of a steel monopole (with a�
thereto� arld support equipmont building (located at tbe ba� of th� pol�) to accom�
radio cquipiucut. T�e tract of land considered fot this iaStallatlot� is Iocated in the
ai tha iatercbar�ge of Truak Highw�.ys SS and a94 ia the City of Mendota Heigbrs,
I)ue to the serious cellular tystem capacity problcros being experienced ia thls po�
G�ties, AT&T Vf�ireless Services approached this offiee a►tth a coastruction permit,
ta proxcd with considerable finana,al risk to er+ect the planned equipmcat eompe
informed tbat a f�+iew and approval by tbe ��deral Highwa.y Administradon (�T
prior to Mn/DO'T's executioa of the lease contract Hawever, there was no repre
thc applicant that the G�ty petmit �ould be waived by Ma/DOT. There was an a�
miswaderstaadi�g between the pardes tbat such permission had previously been n
at ]east three atber sites wera ur�acceptablt to Mendota Heights because of conce,
that tbe fourth �hoice wc�uld satlsfy wuuicipal requiremcnts.
I sig�od the coastruction pr.rinit oa bchs�lf of Mn/DOT as I felt tho rcqucst was re�
corisistent v�rith �ar requests the Departmcnt makes to escpedite its own higl�ww.y
centracts (including severai projccts recently completed or st� unden�ray in your com
Fiuth�rmore� =everal of my ztaff utiliu allulat i�lepbones to perform their assigned
commented to me as to �he lack of available chanaels during th� business day in tbis
�ties. As ttie cellular telephone has evolved from a novelty to a public safety co�
felt takl�g this risk was in the public's best interes�
b12•296-1133
to the above
ucgotiating
�inaa
�s attached
te ccllular
west quadrans
of thc Twin
�ring th� tenant
�. AT&T vvas
vvas required
tion made to
�ea by ar�T as
it had raised and
and
s and have
of the T�►in
tions tool, I
SFM BY�MNIt?4T R13� Ait@ St1RVEYS: 8-16-95 : 12=O1 =
Mr. Jim Da�nieL�on
August !�. 1995
P"age two
�
-.
612 �52 89�0:� 3t 3
Jim. I sincerely apologize if approvinE thi.s permit has creat�d �.ny misunderstandi� or strained
reiatios�s betwc�a Mn�I}QT and tho G�ty, Rsght oi'�a� aud Sutveys s�aif inem'b��cs hav� h$d a
aumber of inectiags with A�T&T WirCtess Servicas and i tbinY cveryane rcaliz�s that an crror waT
m�acie and that appropri�tc �teps hav� be�a taken ta rec�r th� sit�at�an. Thc �7iWA has complcted
its review af tht t�ppTicadcm and act�ion is baistg tak�a by AT&T Wircless Scrvice� to addr+ess �11 five
contingoucics placed #her�an. , .
��' thero i� �ny fiuther actiou reqnired by Mn jL�QT tp campleu the resaluuan of this u�atter, glease
feel firee ta contatt mc at 29b-1133. �
53ncerely,
1 f.�ZGld�'��..... •
. Kati F» Rasmussen. OMirector
Officc of Right of Way and Sunrcys
cc; Wally Oian, F�WA
Max Thamgson, AT&T Wi�eless Ser�c�s
0
z
m
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
September 13, 199
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administr
SUBJECT: Minneapolis/ St. Paul Airport-Area Community Protection
Package - Mendota Heights Position Statement
DISCUSSION
Council is aware of an ongoing effort by the Metropolitan Council
a Minneapolis/ St. Paul Airport-Area Community Protection Concept Pacl
those communities located nearby MSP International Airport. This pack�
intended for use as part of the Dual Track Airport Planning Process whic
conclude in 1997.
At our September 5, 1995 meeting, the Council reviewed and di
number of documents related to this subject including the Draft Comm�
Protection Package prepared by the Met Council, and various Commun
Justification Statements prepared by Minneapolis, Richfield and Eagan.
� prepare
ge for
e is
is set to
a
At that meeting it was explained that a Community Justification St tement
was also expected from Mendota Heights and that the specific elements � f that
statement needed to be defined. The City's Airport Relations Commissio also had
an opportunity to offer suggestions at their meeting which was held on S ptember
6, 1995.
A summary of the points/issues raised by the City Council and elab
upon by the Airport Relations Commission is as follows:
1)
2)
The aircraft departure corridor should be modified over Mendota H
Eagan to take full advantage of the latest air traffic control technol
The inequitable reliance on the Mendota Heights/Eagan corridor
eliminated.
3) Over the Mendota Heights/Eagan area, departing aircraft should be
to utilize, to the fullest extent possible, less noise sensitive areas, s
industrial parks and highway rights of way.
�
hts and
be
as
4) Once modified to take advantage of the latest air traffic control tE
and adjusted to correct for air noise distributional inequities, the t
of the aircraft departure and arrival corridors should be specificall
and air noise exposure standards should be established and enfor
this corridor.
undaries
defined,
:d along
5) ; Nighttime aircraft restrictions should be put into place to ensure t a# only
i Stage III quieter aircraft are flown between the hours of 10:00 p. . and
7:00 a.m.
6) Noise Abatement Departure Procedures (related to how quickly air�Craft gain
altitude upon departure) should be reviewed and adjusted to ensur that the
full performance capabilities of Stage III aircraft are being utilized.
7) The MAC should commit that any airport expansion identified in s bsequent
MSP Comprehensive Plans will be "noise-neutral", meaning that n new
noise impacts, as measured from a base year of 2020, will be gen rated off
of the airport property as a result of the future addition of new run ays.
8) The MAC should establish measurable criteria by which the perfor � ance of
MSP is to be judged in deciding whether or not airport expansion i
warranted.
Each of these points is further defined in the attached document entitled �City of,
Mendota Heights - MSP Airport Noise Mitigation Needs".
ACTION REQUIRED
The MSP Communities Group will be discussing the Draft Commur
Protection Package and the various Community Justification Statements
tomorrow, September 14, 1995. Council should review the draft statem
whatever changes are deemed necessary, and should consider a motion
approving the document for presentation at tomorrow's meeting.
�
make
C1TY C1F N[ENDOTA HEtGHTS
MSP AIRPORT NC1tSE MITIGATitJN NEEDS
As a community directly and seve�ely affected by aircraft operatic
Minneapotis-St. Paut International Airport, #he Ciiy of Mendota Heights i
concerned over the future con#iguration and operation of the airport. A;
the Dual Track Airport Planning Process the City has been approached �
Metropotitan Council to discuss ways in which our community is impact
airport, and strategies for mitigating these impacts. The MinneapolislSt�
Community Protec#ion Concept Package prepared by the Metcopotitan C
represents the product of these discussions and attempts to provide a n
toals and techniques by which Mer�dota Heights and other nearby comn
will be able to address airport related impacts.
�s at
very
part of
� the
d by the
Paul Area
�unci!
mber of
anities
In mitigating the negative impacts associated with aircraft noise e' posure
the City believes #he described tools and techniques will prove valuab[e,�both in
the short and long term. The City also sees the need for meaningful rev� ion to
various aircraft operation procedures at MSP. More specificalty, commu�ity
compatibility with MSP is premised on the fallowing: I
1) The aircraft departure corridor should be modified over Mendota H�ights and
Eagan to take full advantage of #he latest air traffic controt technotpgy. The
introduction af a Global Positioning Satellite navigation system at � SP in
Fali 9 995 should greatiy improve the safety of airspace manageme t, and
wi!! also lessen the distance aircraft need to be separated from on another
to ensure passenger safeiy. Other precisian air traffic cantrol adv ncements
on the horizan wil! only help the MAC and FAA better utilize the ai �space
surrounding MSP to minimize air noise impacts.
2) The inequitable reliance on the Mendota Heights/Eagan corridor sh uld be
elirninated. Ai! communitiss surrounding MSP receive significant e onomic
benefit from i#s close proximity. Similarly, all should be expected t� bear a
� reasonabte and equiiable share of the associated naise burden as ell,
3} Over the Mendota HeightslEagan area, departing aircraft shauld be directed
to utilize, to the fullest extent possible, less noise sensitive areas, s ch as
industriaE park property and highway rights o� way. To fully accom tish th�s
goal, aircraft during non-busy hours should be directed ta fly a cras ing
patkern in the corridor, rather than being given departure headings hich
overfly close-in residential areas. This crossing procedure during n n-bus
times has been approved by the Ntetrapolitan Airports Commission nd is
currently awaiting implementation by the Federal Aviation Administ tion.
4) Once modified to take advantage of the latest air traffic control te�
and adjusted to correct for air noise distributional inequities, the b
of the aircraft departure and arrival corridors should be specifically
; and air noise exposure standards should be established along this
Aircraft operators violating these standards would be subject to s�
monetary fines, similar to the system recently put into place at thE
� Denver International Airport.
I�RAFT
.nno�ogy
�undaries
defined,
:orridor.
new
5) � Nighttime aircraft restrictions should be put into place to ensure th t only
Stage III quieter aircraft are flown between the hours of 11:00 p. . and
6:00 a.m. Such restrictions should be mandatory and violation of he
standards should result in a monetary fine to the offending air carri,er.
6) Noise Abatement Departure Procedures (related to how quickly ai
altitude upon departure) should be reviewed and adjusted to ensu
full pertormance capabilities of Stage III aircraft are being utilized.
ability of these aircraft to rapidly gain altitude, thereby minimizing
noise levels experienced on the ground, should be quantified and
of air traffic departure procedures at MSP.
7) In its MSP Comprehensive Plan, the MAC has identified a future rui
; construction project located on the west side of the airport propert
new North/South runway, if built, is expected to accommodate air
needs well beyond 2020. The face of a�iation will be considerably
by that time and will, hopefully include later generation aircraft whic
substantially quieter than the current Stage III quiet aircraft, and hi�
precision air traffic control technology which will ensure safe airsp�
management with a minimum of aircraft separation. With this in m
MAC should commit that any airport expansion identified in subseq
MSP Comprehensive Plans will be "noise-neutral", meaning that no
noise impacts, as measured from a base year of 2020, will be gene
of the airport property as a result of the future addition of new run�
8) Also related to the MSP Comprehensive Plan, the MAC should es
measurable criteria by which the performance of MSP�is to be juc
deciding whether or not airport expansion is warranted. These p�
criteria should be reported quarterly to allow interested parties to
the need to undertake the improvements described in the ComprE
Plan.
aft gain
that the
raft
e part
way
. This
raffic
different
i will be
I, the
nt
:w
:ed off
ys.
�h
in
Based on the successful implementation of the above, the City of
Heights stands ready to implement a number of the tools and technique:
in the Community Protection Concept Package. Many of the airport noi:
impacted areas within our City are older residential areas. These areas r
suffered under the burden of aircraft noise and have experienced disinve
and decline as a result. In order to stabilize these areas and maintain th�
viability, the use of property value guarantees, tax credits for housing
revitalization, aggressive sound insulation programs, and other describe�
community stabilization programs is necessary and warranted.
DR,AFT
v�endota
described
�ve long
►tment
ir
Residential neighborhoods potentially eligible for these programs i clude
Furlong along State Trunk Highway 55, Curley Addition along Lexington venue,
Rogers Lake Addition along State Trunk Highway 149, Friendly Hills Add tion along
State Trunk Highway 149, and other scattered neighborhoods located in identified
noise impacted areas.
Revitalization of industrial properties within the City's Business Par will
similarly require substantial resources over time. In order to maintain the long
term economic health of this area, the City Council would consider the s lective
use of community stabilization and revitalization tools described in the Community
Protection Concept Package. �
,
The Community Protection Concept Package also discusses a num � er of
airport protection measures designed to prevent incompatible land develo men�
airport impacted areas. The City of Mendota Heights has for many years
cooperated with the Metropolitan Council in adopting and enforcing land �se
controls related to the airport.
In 1987, the City of Mendota Heights became the first and only c
adopt the Metropolitan Council's Aircraft Noise Attenuation Ordinance a
strenuously enforced the Metropolitan Council's Guidelines for Construc
Aircraft Noise Exposure Zones. In addition, the City has made a concer
to limit the total number of new residential units located in areas overflc
aircraft, and has experienced substantial costs in support of litigation to
these goals.
The City takes seriously its responsibility to control the developmen
noise incompatible land uses within Mendota Heights. As such, the City c
support the creation of another regulatory body, such as the Airport Zonin
to usurp the land use authority vested in our duly elected public officials.
"teeth" are to be put into the enforcement of land use patterns, the cities
themselves should be the enforcing authority, not some distant, non-repre
board such as the Airport Zoning Board.
in
to
has
� Within
effort
by
of
�es not
Board,
CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS
►��:�►_� _�
; August 31, 1995
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis t
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Richard A. Gill, Code P.nforcement Office � Q+
Purple Loosestrife Problem
: � . : • �.��
At the August 15, 1995 meeting of the City Council, Mayor Mertensotto �
concern over the proliferation of the plant purple loosestrife and asked staff for a
effected properties. I have observed 27 sites that have at least some purple loose;
Attached is a list of sites and the approximate number of plants at each location.
� • �.
Luke Skinner is the DNR representative responsible for purple loosestrife co�
Through phone conversations and information he has sent me, I have learned what (
Works Personnel have found to be true. Treating the plant with herbicides often res
higher populations the following year. When a plant is sprayed the overspray invari
adjacent plants. This allows the seeds that fall, to germinate without competition. r
Skinner said it takes five (5) years of treatment to control the plant by this method.
reason the DNR has abandoned herbicide use in the metro area. The pond north of �
is a prime example. In 1994 City crews spent 50 maa hours and used 5 gallons of F
herbicide in an attempt to kill the plants. This year it was reali7xd that the size of tU
looks larger than before. It is estimated that the control of the loosestrife in all City
property would require two additional workers about four (4) weeks each summer fc
years and 20 plus gallons of herbicide at from $70 -$110.00 per gallon each year.
If chemical control is undertaken, it is best to spray in mid-summer through
(July 1 through September 1) because the herbicides are most effective at this time ;
plants are easily identif'ied.
The DNR's control efforts are now directed at insects that eat only purple
plants. These "beetles" are still in the experimental stage, but Mr. Skinner hopes
(5) years they will colonize, reproduce, and help control the spread of the plant.
these beetles have been released in the Dodge Nature Center where there are num
on which to feed.
rt of the
present.
:y Public
�ts in
�ly� kills
r.
or this
ity Hall
deo
crop
wned
five (5)
rly fall
t the
i five
of
plants
It is my intention to notify the owners of minimally effected properties and explain,
with DNR supplied handout material, the importance of controlling small infestations of the
plant before they spread into uncontrollable larger areas. City personnel will hand pull plants
from City properiy that is minimally effected.
r_�.��•�i��•fin: - .
Consider the problem and discuss whether additional control methods are warranted.
907 Cheri Lane
2301. Swan Drive
2357 Swan Drive
2351. Swan Drive
991 Wagon Wheel Trai1
816 Hilltop road
Roge'rs Lake Park
Rogers Lake Park
Rogers Lake
Dodge Nature Center
Friendly �[ills Marsh
Darsow Pond
Capperfield Pond
City H[all Pond
Sutton Marie
Valley Fark
Valley Park
Valley Park
Henry Sibley High 5chool
State ProPertY
Wentworth Park Pond
Hagstram Pond
King Pond
Visitation Canvent
Dodd Road
I3ighway 110 Ditch
Friendly Hills Pond
' 1: ' .i i ii: I�i
(3n Ragers Lake shareline
On Ragers Lake shoreline
(3n Ragers Lake shoreline
On Rogers Lake shoreline
4n Ragers Lake shoreline
In flower bed fmnt yard
On shoreline
In pond
Past side on island & shoreline
$-�� Q�aI1tS I
1-5 plants
1-5 plants
1-5 plants
5-10 plants
1 plant
5-10 plants (City
1-5 plants (City)
25-SU plants (Dr
'West of Delaware between Huber Drive I
& Highwap 11Q 250-5Q0 plants
North of Cheyenne West of Huber SQO-1000 plants (
North and west shoreline 54-1U0 plants (Ci
North shoreliue 25-50 p2ants (Cit;
Narth of City H[all Over �0{l0 plauts
�Iolding pond narth side of l�+iarie between
Trai1 Raad & Suttan 1Q-25 plants {Cit;
In and around pand 100-200 plants (C
kIighway 1I.0 to l�Zarie -
massive pmblem throughout 500-1000 plants i
Marie to Highway 13 scattered
thraughout 500-1000 plants i
South by frontage Road Highway I10 250-500 �
Tria.ngle formed by Delaware Ave., Highway 110,
and Frontage Road 10-25 plants
In marsh/pond east end 25q-500 plants ((
Shareline 5-10 (City)
Shoreline 5-10 (City)
Pond/Marsh east of driveway 50-100
Ditch at'Wesley Lane
Stream north edge af McDonalds
Shoreline random
One Plant (State)
25-54
10-15 (City)
significant statistic is that one-fourth of the sites
have over 1,000 plants per site (Table �. These
lazge infestations aze nearly impossible to
control. Several areas in Minnesota that have
heavy infestations of purple loosestrife aze sites
that collections of L. salicaria in the University
of Minnesota Herbazium document as having an
early occanence of the plant (Table 'n.
�
Research
Review ' of Control Methods. The Purple
Loosestrife Program hegan its research of
control methods with a review of past research.
Purple loosestrife control was first initiated in
the 1950s by wildlife managers and researchers.
Early control efforts, hoth mechanical and
chemical, were lazgely unsuccessful (Gagnon
1953; McKean 1959; Smith 1959; Smith 1964;
Friesen �19fi�. The advent of new herbicides
and a better understanding of purple loosestrife
biology and ecology has led to better control
methods in recent years.
Table 6.-Percentxge of purple loosestrife infestations in
Minnesod� classificd by number of plaats in infestation.
Number of Plants Infestatioas
. _ . . ���
1-20 29
21-99 22
100-999 ' 23
> 1000 27
Table 7.�Sites with heavy purple loosestrife populatioas
in 1987 aad their herbarium recorda from 1967 or eulicr.
Site . County Year
Lake Minnetonka • Henncpin 1947
Morris • Steveos 1952
Duluth ' S� Louis 1952
L�ce Minncwsshta Cuver 1967
Lake Winona Winona
14
Four methods of inechanical c� �
been tried since 1959: floodi ��
burning, and hand pulling. 1
established loosestrife stands was �
(McKeon 1959; Rawinski 1982).
stressed the loosestrife, caus'
mortalities, but the majority of
survived with no reduction in cov
loosestrife se�dlings were also tes
susceptibility. to floading. Bal
flooded loosestrife see�lings under
conditions for periods of three and e
After thre� weeks of flooding,
scedlings remained. Eight weeks o
however, was very successful:
survived after the seventh week.
concluded that the duration of fl
more important than the depth of
causing seedling mortality.
Cutting of loosestrife at the wate
below the water level was attempted
{1959) with little success. The
resprouted, reinhabiting the azea fr
laosestrife was removed. Malecki anc
(1979) found that the loosestrife
quickly after cutting and that if cut ea�
in the year, the loosestrife would
flower, and set see� that same season
Burning was also unsuccessful at i
loosestrife. Burns conducted by McK�
and Rawinski (1982) failed to kill the
and the loosestrife resprouted foll�
burns.
The most successful mechanic�
method for purple loosestrife is re
hand. Rawinski (1982) notes tha�
method to be �successful, the whole pl
be removed, including the entire ro�
When raots pieces are left behind, the�
This method of control is labor int�
time consuming. Soil disturbance frc
or . other me�hanical means als�
conditions that promote se�dling est�
from the see� bank.
Control of purple loosestrife with
was lazgely unsuccessful until the intra
glyphosate. Glyphosate killed adult ;
plants (up to 95 %) with great G
(Maleki and Rawinski 1980; Balo
Notestein 1986; Reinartz et al
l have
cutting,
ling of
e flooding
a few
the plants
r. Purple
for their
gh � (1986)
ght weeks.
many live
f flooding,
no plants
Balogh
oding was
ooding in
level and
� McKeon
�osestrife
m which
Rawinski
esprouted
y enough
resprout,
mtrolling
�n (1959)
ootstock,
wing the
control
oval by
for this
it should
system.
ve and
pulling
creates
of
.1986;
1986).
Glyphosate is, hawever, a broad sp�trum
herbicide and eff'ectively killed all ather wetland
piant species. When sprayed in a braadcast
fashion, all vegetation was eliminated, apening
up the canopy, and providing ideal conditians
for loosestrife germination from the seed bank
(Rawinski 1982; Batagh 1986; Natestein 198b}.
2,4D has been the second most commonly
used herbicide for parple laasestrife cantral.
Although its ability to cantrol l.00sestrife is
incansistent, it is used because af its selectivity
for broadleaf plants and its low cost (Cagnan
1953; McKeon 1959; Smith 1959; Smith i964;
Notestein 198�. Most wetlands aze dominated
by monocots such as cattails, sedges, grasses,
and rushes, Scirpus spp., which are not affected
by a treatment of 2,4D. Aquatically labeled
2,4-D prodacts aze most efifective on first year
seedlings of loosestrife.
The use of replacement species or competirive
species in the suppression of purple loosestrife is
still in the early stages af zesearch. A species
that competes successfully with purple loosestrife
in a wide variety of coaditians and is itseif not
a problem has nat yet been found. Furthermore,
discing and seeding areas invaded by ioasestrife
can prodnce conditions that promate the growth
aud spread of Ioosestrife.
Japanese millet, Echinochloa frumeruacea,
shows same potenti�l as a replacement,species,
but it is not a native sge�ies, and it does not
appear ta be invasive {'Thomgson et al, 198'7).
Rawinski (1982) tested seven plant species for
cantral af purple laasestrife se�dlings. Soon
afteac a drawdown on a small loosestrife infesteci
pond, Rawinski glacerl Japanese millet seed an
the newiy exposed mudflat. The millet
suppxessed the growth of loosestrife se�dlings
well, at least in the short term. Rawinski alsa
tested reed canary grass, Phalaris arundinaceae;
nodding smartweed, Potygonum tapathifolium;
water plant�ain, Alisma subcordcuum; switch
grass, Panicum virgatum; yeliaw nutsedge,
Cyperus esculentus; and alkali bulrush, Scirpus
paludosus, Each species was planted by itself
and in a mixture with loosestrife sced. Only the
millet showed pramise in suppressing Ioosestrife
growth. Its success cauld be due to its ability ta
withstand periodic flaading during the grawing
seasan.
1S
Balogh tested not�ding smartweed; saltmarsh
cockspur grass, Echinochloa walteri; and
e3'Perus ferruginescens in competition with
purple loasestrife. Field studies showed that
nodding smartweed dominated garple loosestrife
during the first year of grawth when sced was
planted at na#ural seed praduction rates.
Saltmazsh cockspur grass and Cyperus
ferruginescens were nat successful in competing
with loasestrife seedlings in the first year of
gxowth. In laboratory studies laosestrife
dominated the nadding smariwced under
artificially maintained low light levels and
saturated soil conditians.
Cooperative Research, From the literature
review and e�c7tensive discussions, the Purple
Loosestrife Program staff concluded that there
was insufficient understanding of purple
loosestrife bialogy and management to initiate a
broad-scale control effort and that basic research
was nee�ed to determine appropriate control
methods. In 19$S, a cooperative group began to
study new chemicats and rates and methods of
applicatian far effective purple loosestrxfe
contrai. The agencies invalved were the
Minnesota DNR. and DOT, the Wisconsin DNR,
Hennegin Parks; DOW t�emicai Company, the
University of Minnesota, lacal herbicide dealers,
and Uucks Unlimited vf Canada.
The group's goal was to decide what research
was neede� and to insure that all necessary
research was accomplished without excessive
duplication. The group tested three herbicides:
Rodeo (glyphasate), Garlon 3A (triclopyr}, and
2,4D praducts labelecl for aquatic use. The
herbicides were applied with high volume
handguns, backpack sprayers, and low volume
broadcast techniques at vazious agpiication rates
and at selecter� times durutg the 1988 and 1989
growing seasons. �
The group's field trials found that glyphosate,
labeled foz aquatic use as Rodeo, was the most
effective herbicide available for control of
laosestrife. Because it is a broad spectcum
herbicide, however, Rode� will harm or destroy
any vegetation ta which it is applied {Table 8}
and is thus recammended only for spot spraying.
Bzoadcasting Rodeo can eliminate the entire
vegetative cover of an area. The retention of a
a
Table 8.—Mean perccnt change in caver of purple loosestci.fe Lythnan scrlicaria L., and specific non-tatget
after treaknetrt with glyphosatG and a surfactant {Skinner and Hollenhorst 1989).
TI'CAhriC1'llt �8te�
alyghos�tc + X 7?
Cityghosaic + R=7?
Cilyphoixte + X 77
4lyphoute + X-77
Giyphauu +
Cidrkick II
ptyphos+�:te +
C'idekick II
aly�hosate +
C:idekick II
tilyghow�tc +
Cidekick II
Coutrol
i.o + o.i
1.4 + O.ZS
p.5 + 0.1
4.5 + 0,25
1.0 + O.I
1.0 + 4.25
0.5 + 0.1
Q.S + 0.25
Mean chsnge ia cover {96)
L. salicuia Sx�iWru Impatiant
�1 _100 + 400
-49 + 25 + 900
-� -100 • + 813
�� -100 +2100
-� -100 +967
-� -100 -85
70 _100 77
-� -lU0 97
+ 6 _1pp 0
Nate: The genen and one family liste� abave denote more than ane species (sp�.)
' Fercant by vaiume of herbieide:ad stufactxnt in salutiaa with water.
dense vegexative canopy is extremely important
for tiie suppressian of sced germination and
scedling growth af purple laosestrife. Ii the
vegetative canapy is removed, the soil suriFace is
exposed to sunlight, and seed gemaination is
pramoted. In most cases, purpia taosestrife
scedlings are so numerous and aggressive that
they outcompete ather maist-soil plant se�diings.
The resulting dense, monotypic stand of
toosestrife can be worse thau the calany initialty
present (Table 9). �
The results af triais using See 2,4D and
Weedestroy AM 40 (both 2,4D .prodacts)
shawed the effe�tiveness of these herbicides to
be variable and unpredictable (Table 10). These
herbicides aze sele�tivs herbicides that can be
used for braadcast or high-volume aquatic
applications on dense or eAtensive stands of
Ioosestcife. Seiective herbicides affect the
dicots, or broadleaf plants, while having little
impact on the monoca#s snch as grasses, sedges,
and cattails. These 2,4D herbicides can
eIiminaie a year's productian af seed, but they
do not kill the plants, which will resproat the
fotiawing yeaz.
The program also evalaated another selective
herhicide. Garlon 3A, a triciapyr that is not
labeled for aquatic use, was tested in 1988 and
�
t3tamincso
-91
_g7
-89
-91
_g7
_gs
� -77
A7
1989 nnder an experimental use per.
U.S. Environmentai Protectzan A�
cooperating agencies conducted fi�
piat trials with geuera�ly gasitive r�
11 and 12). Gazlon 3A was more e
the 2,4-D praducts in killing �e
rather than just the above-gro�
{Tab1e 13}. Garton 3A did not kill t
monocots such' as grasses, sedges,
{Table 14}. The l�est results were ot
Gazlan 3A (caile� Renavate when
aquatie sites) was applied with lazge
water (1 % Garlon 3A) and when th
plants a►ere sprayed until they were
Low volume aerial applications a
were also testerl by the MN-DNR
ineffe�tive at the rates (l.S and
applied. Six test plots were
established to test aerial treatm�
Marine Lake, Minnesata. One :
treatment, the loosestrife laoked in ;
healthy. More research is neede
treatments to test different zates;
applications, and volume of
apglications:
Hennepin Parks of Minnesata, u
cooperating in the herbicide
documented the distribution and spre
ecies one year
Thetyptcria
_g6
4
-33
�5
_g
-4$
-2i
-44
-35
: frOnl the
cy. Tite
and test
ts {Tables
ctive thau
tire plant
t portion
uantarget
tained when
labeled for
amounts of
; loosestrife
wet.
` Gazlon 3A
and proved
3.0 ib/A)
randomly
nts at Big
nonth after.
;enerat very
1 on aerial
timing of
water in
addition to
research,
d of purple
Table 9.—Mean-percent changc in cover of purple
loasestrife, Lythrum scdicaria, and non-target plant species
ano year after secand glyphoscte {Radeo) applicatiort
(Skinner and Holl�nhmst f989).
Mean change in
SpeCies cAVCt (%)
L. Salicaria + 175
Typha - 57
Sagittaria + 2b7
Gramizeeae spp. - - 80
Carex - 9S
Impatiens + 525
'Glyphasate was npplied xt i% salution with water.
Table 24.—MGsn-ga+cem chsngc in cover of pcup2o
loosesirife, Lythrum �aFica�ia, aad nan-targat plant species
one }+ear xfter 2,4D trcatrnent (Slcinner and Hollcahorst
1989).
MeAn change 3n
Species cover {�',}
L. Salicari: - 24
Typhs + 113
SAgittaria O
Grasrrineae spp. + 334
Cuex - 24
Tatpatiene -F 28i
'2,4D was sppli�d at .5 % solution with wxter.
�
Tabte 11 � Mean-percent reduction af porpie loosesttife,
Lythnan salicuria, aad causil with tric2apyr (Guian 3A}
one year after treatment, Morris and White Bear Lalce,
Minnesotu (Backer et sl. 1989).
MORRIS WffiTE BEAR LARE
Triclopyr Aupk Purplo
oraarm Rau T.oao- Loasa
Stega lblA strifo Caua�7 urife Cat�ail
F.�rty Fka+cr 3.0 33 10 77 13
Euiy Flowtr 6.0 45 15 98 d4
I.ate Fiowez 3.Q 32 34 68 3
Late Flawtr 6.0 3E 48 93 3
Table 12.—Maaa-perc,e� chauge in cov� af purpic
laosesh�ife, Lythnan saticasia L., by growti� stage oae year
after bre�tmcat with triclapyt'. Carvcr Puk Reserve,
Mianesota (Skinncr aad Hollenhor�t 1989).
Megn chaage ia
Grawt6 Stage cover {%)
Pra-ftower ' - 95
Eariy-flower - . 92
Lato-flawer - 81
Posi flawe,r - 73
Eariy!later�flawer - 8U
Cou�crl + 10
` Triclopyx was agpLicd at 2 46 solufian with watcr, aad all
treahneats contained 0.2596 X 77 snrfactan�
Table 13.—Purple loosestrife, Lythium'salicarra, coatrol at White Bear Lake, Minnaso#� (Bxkar et at. 1989}.
Pencent Control
Spriag Agplied FaU Applied
Ratc P. ioasestrife Caxttuil P. Loosestrife Cattail
Herbicide (Ib/Acre} 9/15/89 9l15/89 9l15/89 9l15189
Triclapyr 3A 77 0 68 3 �
Triclopyr 6.0 92 8 93 3
2,4D 3.0 28 0 37 0
1�
Table 14.—Mean percent change in cover of epecific non-target plant species by growth stage one yea� after treahnent
triclopyl" (Garlon 3A); Carver Park Reserve, Minnesota (Slcinner and Hollenhorst 1989). I
Mean change in cover (°b)
Growth stage Typha Sag'dtaria Gramineae
Pra-flower - SO
Esrly-flower - 27
Lato-flower - 3
Post flower - SO
Early/lato-flower - 40
Control
-13
- 38
- 65
+ 292
+ 128
+ 117
- 39
- 1362
+ 639
+ 375
- 8
+ 664
+ 104
'T'riclopyr was applied at 196 solution, and sll treatments contained 0.2596 X-77 surfactan�
loosestrife in Hennepin Pazks and studied the use
of plant competitors to suppress loosestrife
growth at the seedling stage (Skinner and
Hollenhorst 1989). The plant competition
studies showed that none of the species tested
could suppress loosestrife scedling growth under
natural conditions. Only catxails, under specific
conditions (artificially manipulated) suppressed
loosestrife scedling germination and growth.
Test burns of purple loosestrife were carried
out by both DNR aQd Hennepin Pazks with poor
results. Both loosestrife test areas were treated
with an herbicide, then �bumed after the
loosestrife had died. In bo� cases, the burn
provided ideal conditions for laosestrife � to
germinate from the see� bank, resulting in
carpets of purple loosestrife seedlings.
Nonchemical Control Methods. The results of
the work with herbicides reinforced the view
that removal of the mature plants was only part
of the answer to purple loosestrife control.
Program staff concluded that a more
comprehensive long-term management strategy
had to be developed to deal with the massive
seed bank accumulated beneath established
loosestrife stands. Consequently, a two year
�200,000 research project, funded by the state
legislature as recommendefl by the LCMR was
established.
In July 1989, the DNR contracted with four
researchers at the University of Minnesota and
one at the University of Winnipeg in Manitoba,
Canada to begin research that would lead to
18
long-term management strategies
laosestrife including nonchemical m
research included studies of the E
genetics and taxonomy of purple 1
how lazge and how long-lived .th
sced bank is, and of how it can be i
suppressed. What kind of plants �
as replacement spe�ies in wetland
to discourage the growth of looses i�
researchefl (Welling and Becker 1
investigations aze providing backgro
biological control experiments �
development of a management pl
integrated gest management (IP1Vn ,
purple laosestrife.
The Purple Loosestrife Program is
with � the United States Dep
Agriculture-Beneficial Inse�t Lab (�J
and Cornell University on researc
for the development of a biological �
loosestrife. This involves a length
process to select suitable insects that
purple loosestrife without harmin
plants in areas where they are releasa
aid this research, the DNR's Purple
Program collected and shipped
loosestrife root crowns and ample
seed to Europe to be used in the
control research.
In 1992,.. three insects were ap
release in the United States by
Department of Agriculture. A
weevil, Hylobius transversovittatus,�
leaf�ating beetles, Calerucella culma
40
36
106
0
75
25
for purple
ods. This
�estrife, of
loosestrife
ninated or
ht be used
was also
). These
d data for
for the
using an
�ategy on
of
conducted
;ontrol for
screening
�ill fced on
desirable•
l. To help
over 500
mounts of
biological
�oved for
the U.S.
and two
ensis and
G, pusitla, have shown the most promise far
controlling loosestrife. Minnesota, along with
siat other states, received these three insect
species for release and evaluation. To date,
MN-DNR and MDA have seven zelease sites ta
research these inse�ts on the field. AIl three
insect species have shawn that they can survive
Minnesota winters and hecame established, but
it is too earty to know haw effective these
insects will be as biologicat control agents in
Minnesata. Research at Cornell Univezsity is
alsa being funded by the MN-DNR to facilitate
the establishment of the Eurapeau insects
cuzrently in Minnesota and bring into the United
States two additionat European flawer-feeiiing
beetles for the contral of laasestrife.
Corttrol Work
The Purple Laosestrife Program began control
wazk in 19$8 with several methods, primarily
chemical treatments. Because the sta#f lacked
experience in managing laosestrife, chemical
treahnents made daring 1988 were considered
e�erimental. Selective spot spraying, in most
cases with the herbicide Rotiea {glyphosate), was
used on small infestations of less than 1U0
glants, A soiution of 190 Rodeo and .2S 9&
Ortb.o X 77 surfactant was used in all
treatments. DNR crews treated raughiy 300
acres, taking 342 warker hours ta complete the
work. Cammercial agplicatars hired by the
DNR treated 7Q0 acres, taking 1,311 wark hours
ta complete the task. The total cost far these
treatments was $55,000. All treatments
comglet�d by the DNR we:re applied fram the
graund nsing either backpack equipment or
truck-maunted high-pressure sprayers. Mare
control work was complet.�d by grivate citizens,
but the total amount is unknown.
In 1989, tiie program expande�fi contral work
to include more loosestrife infestations. For the
first time, large infestations were treated from
the air. Four hundred eighty seven acres mostly
located in the western counties of Minnesota
were treated with Rodeo or 2,4D. Two
experimental sites in Washutgton County were
treated from the air to test the effectiveness af
Garlan 3A herbicide. Aerial applications were
the least expensive way of applying herbicide to
19
loasestrife infestations, averaging $41 an acre.
Three hundred ten acres were treated for
taasestcife on the graund with backpack sprayers
and high-pressure sprayers. Ground applications
were more cost�y, averaging $157 an acre for
DNR crews and 5310 an acre for commercial
applicators. A tatal af $104,000 was sgent on
loosestrife control work in 1989. .
Althaugh graund applications were more
expensive, they were also more effective than
aerial applications. A much higher percentage
of control �cras accomplished by spot treating the
new small infestations before a large seed banlc
cauld develop. Aerial applications made to large
stands of loasestrife with Rodeo killed all
emergent vegetation in the treated azeas. The
following season, the treated azeas were
dominated by carpets of loosest� ife seedlings and
adult laosestrife plants that survived the
treatment. Subsequent creatments had similar
results.
The Purple Loosestrife Pragram continues to
treat 6p0 to '700 acres a year at a cost of
��O,O�Q. These efforts are caacentrated on
small, new infestations in watersheds with sma�ll
P�Pulatians of purpla loo�estrife.
C4IICI1LS14ILS SIi{� ��Il�£I12�Ii�
Recommendations '
Purple loosestrife is here to stay in Minnesota .
as well as in North America. Liks mast exotic
species, laosestrife is impossible to eliminate �
once it becames established. Because of its
hazdy and aggressive nature and its prolific se�d
production, purple laosestrife will cantinue to
flourish and expand in tha state and nationwide.
Today's contral options aze very limited and
pravide anly short-term controi. Control
techniques aze labor intensive and costly and
must be app2ied annually for an undeternuned
number of years.
Thus, managing purple loosestrife au a
statewide basis is a difficult task that needs
rea2istic management abjectives, such as keeping
laasestrife out of uninfested watersheds and
siawing its spread.� To accomgiish ihese
objectives requires close coordination of the
program's faur main rssponsibilities:
broadening . public awareness, conducting
C •
inventories of infestations, researching control
methods, and carrying out control work.
Public Awareness and Inventories
The program will continue its efforts to
increase public awazeness about purple
loosestrife. A statewide control plan will not
succeed without the support and help of the
citizens of Minnesota. Citizens can help in
inventories, control work, fundraising, and
garnering legislative support for the loosestrife
program.
Statewide inventories are key to establishing
priorities for control work when funding and
control techniques are limited. Enlisting the
public in ieporting incidental sightings helps to
establish a solid database of loosestrife
infestations. When possible, incidental sightings
should be checked for accuracy, especially if
they are new, small in�`estations, which will
have highest priority for control.
The cooperation of state agencies such as the
DOT and the MDA atid of local government
represernatives such as county agricultural
inspectors are also key to developing a solid
database. These agencies have field staff
statewide who can be trained to identify and
report infestations in their azea. This database
can help facilitate work for all agencies
controlling purple laosestrife, and an ongoing
inventory can track the rate and degree of
spread.
Research
Development of effective long term control
methods is an important goal of the program's
research. Research on biological controls, the
use of competitive spe�ies, seed bank dynamics,
and the use of more selective herbicides is
essential to achieve long-term control of purple
loosestrife. Removal of existing loosestrife
plants is not the final solution. Seed banks in
established laosestrife infestations aze very lazge
and have sceds that aze viable for many years.
Methods are needed to deplete the seed bank or
to provide continual long-term control of the
adult plants.
Ultimately, the use of herbicides should he
20
reduced: they provide only short-
and have potential negative impacl
sites with repeated use. An int
management strategy should be de�
uses several control techniques.
The best hope for long-term
biological control, which has the
reduce large loosestrife infestatic
native vegetation to re�stablish itsel;
control will never eliminate loo�
would reduce it to one of many �
present. If biological controls pro
labor costs and herbicide use will
and continual control can be achii
research nceds, however, are not s
and cooperative efforts betwcen stab
agencies are essential to speed the �
of more effective control methods.
Control Stnategies
Laws and regulations have incr
awazeness and the amount of� co
performed by state agencies, 1
government, and private landown
DNR, however, does not have the r
control all the loosestrife infestations�
it is responsible. This situation makes
for county agricultural inspectors and
inspectors to enforce control on pri�
For example, enforcing control of a
on private land is unrealistic when
manages a wetland across the street �
of loosestrife that is not being cont�
1991, the noxious we�d law was :
include language that directs the DNF
a statewide priority list for controlling
(see appendix). Loosestrife sites on 1
treated in order until control funds arE
Thus, development of a statewide p�
for controlling loosestrife infesta�
become a key part of the program.
Because water is the main avenue of
loosestrife sced, the program recomn
current management strategies for c
purple loosestrife use a watershed
Preventing loosestrifefrom becoming e
in uninfested watersheds and preve
spread within watersheds should be t]
priority. Control work should start at
rm control
on aquatic
;rated pest
loned that
control is
�otential to
s allowing
Biological
strife, but
int species
; effective,
}e reduced
ed. Most
�te specific
ind federal
�ed public
trol work
units of
rs. The
sources to
for which
it difficult
ocal wced
ate lands.
:ew plants
the state
hat is full
�lled. In
�evised to �
. to create
ie list are
depleted.
iority list
ons has
.for
that
ng the
highest
; top of
watersheds to prevent seed flaw downstream. If
control work is started lower in the watershed,
the sites can become reinfested from infestations
upstream. Spread can be prevented by
controiling the new, sma11 infestatians as they
appeaz in uninfested watersheds.
The grogram does aat recammend control
attempts on lazge infestations because
mechanical methods and herbicide treatments
available are ineffectivs. Furthermare, attempts
to contral large infestations can divert limited
funds from many small infestatians where the
gotential for control is higher. Infestations will
then increase exponentially and the end resalt
will be many more lazge infestations (Moody
and Mack 1988). '
The mast effective cantrol for purple
ioosestrife is to spat-treat each loosestrife plant
with the herbicide Rodeo (glyphasate). This
methad can be useil for a vaziety af site tyges
and, infestation sizes. The herbicide rates
preferred for cantral�ing Iaosestrife are 1�
herbicide solutian in water. A surfactant such as
Yaient X=77 or Cidekick II shauid be added to
the herbicide mix at a rate of 0.25%. These
rates are for backpack or high-�ressure
handguns.
Once Garlon 3A hecomes labeled for aquatic
use, it will be the herbicide af choice because af
its seiectivity far broadleaf plants and its lawer
cost. Garlon 3A should be applied at the sam.e
rate as Rodeo. There are accasians when
loosestrife can be treated with a boom
applicator. In this situation, only braadleaf
selective herbicides such as Garlon 3A shauld be
used. For boom application, Garlan 3A should
be applied at a rate of 3 to 5 Ib/A, A s�zrfactant
should be used at 0.25'� in solutian.
Systematic treatment af loosestrife stands is
essential ta ensure that each plant gets treateti.
If desirab2e, a dye can be adde� ta the herbicide
mix to mark plants that have been treated.
Marking is especially useful when infestations
aze large or spread out. Systematic treatment
can be also achieved 6y ather means, including
marking treated azeas with ribhon ar having the
appiicators walk side by side thraugh the area.
Other control methads, such as hand removal
of ptants, can be effective in certain situatians.
Table 15 provides a guide far choosing a method
21
�for controlling loosestrife, depending on site
chazacteristics and infestatian size,
In canclusian, herbicides can be used to
control and sometimes eradicate small
uifestations of pnrple loasestrife. Hawever,
when purple laosestrife cannot be eradicated,
control fram the uss of herbicides is usua�lly
short-term, Therefore, large, well.established
infestations of purple loosestrifs gsnerally should
not be treated with herbicides. C3n a state Ievel,
herbicides can be used most effe�tively by
targeting control efforts at s�mati, isolated
infestations to mini�mize expansion into these
newly infested azeas. The abiiity far lang-term
control of purple loosestri�'e is dependent upan
finding successful bioiagicai controi agents.
Effarts should be made to ar,celerate the
biologicai cantrol effarts by coordinating at the
state, region and national levels. Without these
efforts, FurPle loosestrife wili continue ta invade
and degrade wetland resources. ,
a�
L�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 30, 1995
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Admini
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson ��S
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Meeting Schedule
INFORMATION
Council has recently directed stafFto poll the Planning Commission for its pr�
for a joint workshop on the Highway 55 Study. Additionally, the first Council meetn
October fa11s on a Jewish holyday, and Council may wish to reschedule that meeting
date.
DISCUSSION
The five members of the Planning Commission who were present at the Ca
August 22 meeting discussed eight potential dates in September and eazly October
workshop. The only date wluch is workable for them is Thursday, September 28.
be available to attend the workshop. '
There is no legal restriction against conducting public meetings on religious hc
however, in the past Council has expressed sensitivity to scheduling meetings on days
observance of significant religious holydays would restrict individuals from attending
meetings. Yom Kippur, which is the most holy day in the Jewish year, begins at sundc
Tuesday, October 3, which is the date of a regularly scheduled Council meeting, and e
nightfall on October 4. Council could reschedule the meeting to Monday, October 2 o
Thursday, October 5.
ACTION REQUIRED
Council should discuss holding the Highway 55 workshop on September 28
also discuss rescheduling the October 3 meeting. After discussion, Council should �
separate motions to schedule the workshop and reschedule the October 3 meeting to
dates.
rred dates
in
another
.on's
joint
� would
on
at
should
u�� ,
.kyNj�y,} �;�� y!
�
4
�
w
`� DESCRIPTION FOR PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE
(Lythrum salicaria)
WHEN TO LOOK FOR IT
Mid July through the end of August when it is in
bloom and easily recognized.
WHERE TO LOOK FOR IT:
It is present on wet soils to shallow standing
marshes, stream and river banks, lake shores and
ditches.
WHAT IT LOOKS L1KE:
Growth Habit: Upright hardy perennial, bushy,
up to 7 feet tall.
Flowers: Purple-magenta color. Flowers
numerous on a long spike; 5-6 petals per flower.
Leaves: Vary, although usually opposite; linear
shape and smooth edges. Attached directly (no
stalk) to a four-sided stem.
Roots: Woody taproot with fibrous root system
that forms a dense mat.
HOW IT SPREADS:
It is a prolific seed producer; also grows from
underground root and sprouts from broken-off
plant parts.
a
�� THE INVASION OF PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE amefish in Minnesota
2-7 ft, in height
Flowers on spike;
closely attached
, to stem
5-6 petals per flower
Opposite
leaf arrangement
Stiff, four-sided stem
�I ✓ � �e�
Y�
BEAUTY IS ONLY SKIN DEEP!
The attractive plumage of purple loosestrife conceals its menacing
ature.
WHAT IS PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE?
Purple loosestrife is an aquatic plant that is
gaining a foothold in Minnesota. The plant is widely
distributed in the northeastern United States, and
over the past five years loosestrife has increased
significantly in Minnesota. You may have seen the
plant's magenta flowers which are strikingly evident
throughout July and August.
This hardy perennial has been introduced from
Europe. Because of its exotic origin, loosestrife has
left behind all of its natural enemies and multiplies
with no checks or balances in North America.
WHAT IS THE MAJOR IMPACT?
The plant aggressively crowds out the vegetation
required by wildlife, while having no value for
wildlife itself.
For example, songbirds do not make use of the
small hard seed. Muskrat require cattail to build
their homes and they show a preference for cattail
over loosestrife for food. Waterfowl, especially
ducks, shun wetlands that have become dominated
by loosestrife. In addition, overall waterfowl
production is decreased as habitat is eliminated.
Finally, the plant's growth is generally too compact
to offer cover, and cover may be as crucial to
wildlife as food.
Behind the brilliant guise of purple loosestrife
hides an ugly strategy: the takeover of wetlands.
Loosestrife is displacing the native wetland plants at
an alarming rate. To date, it has invaded virtually all
of the watersheds of New York. Thousands of acres
in Minnesota are potential habitat for loosestrife,
and many wetlands are already infested with the
When the conditions are right, a small isolated
group of loosestrife plants can spread and cover a
marsh in only one growing season. Once
established, loosestrife is difficult to control.
The shallow woody root system forms a dense
mat, making adult plants difficult to pull. If the
entire root is not taken, then it will resprout. If
plants are mowed, the stem pieces will actually
send out new roots, eventually become anchored
and begin new colonies.
Besides these vegetative maneuvers, each planYs
flower spike has the capability to produce 120,000
seeds in a single season. These seeds remain viable
when submerged for many years while waiting for
the opportunity to sprout. Then during a dry
summer, these seeds germinate suddenly. Often
the dispersal is such that the seedlings have the
capacity to completely replace native vegetation.
HOW DOES LOOSESTRIFE AFFECT YOU?
The detrimental effects on wildlife habitat are
alarming enough, but there are also economic
considerations which will affect the state of
Minnesota:
• Millions of dollars have been invested in
wetlands by Minnesota and federal agencies in
order to sustain waterfowl production. Once
these areas are taken over by loosestrife, the
efforts-financial and otherwise-will be lost.
• The loss of waterfowl habitat will decrease
acreage available for hunting, affecting both
the hunters and their conMbution to the local
economies of the communities they visit.
• Fisheries may be adversely affected . Of
particular concern is the northern pike which
has quite specific spawning requirements for
wetlands. This fish is one of the most popular
s •
• Once the aggressive loosestrife establishes in
drainage ditches, more frequent cleanout will
become an additional financial burden to the
farmer and other landowners.
• The presence of loosestrife may lower land
value and could have serious effects on the
resale.
• The future impact to wild rice producflon is not
known, but commercial management techniques
for wild rice paddies set up ideal germination
conditions for loosestrife.
HOW TO CONTROL SMALLER
POPULATIONS
Because purple loosestrife is so widely distributed
in the United States, it is unlikely that elimination is
possible. But, because the species has not become
well established in many areas, halting the spread of
loosestrife and eliminating it from newly-invaded
areas is certainly feasible.
The key to stopping the spread of loosestrife lies
in recognizing the plant when it first appears and
eradicating it before it becomes a dominant part of
the wefland ecosystem. By implementing the
following measures, we can stem the invasion of
loosestrife in Minnesota.
By Hand — Generally effective on smap clusters
up to 100 plants.
• Younger plants can be hand pulled.
• Older plants, especially those in bogs and deep
organic soils, can be dug out.
• Roots must not be broken off or they will
resprout.
• All plant parts must be removed, dried, and if
possible, burned. Plant parts can reroot
otherwise.
By herbicide — May be necessary for clusters in
excess of 100 plants (up to 3 acres).
• Minnesota statutes require that any applicator of
herbicide to waters of the state must have a
permit from the Department of Natural
Resources (DNR). To obtain commercial
herbicide application recommendations, a
permit application, or to determine' whether a
permit is required contact the DNR
Headquarters nearest you.
; . :.
T � � y
T
# af�����
* E:ngin�erin� ..
* � � '*' ,,... .�
2422 Enter rl9e tirive
Mendotc He 9hts, MN SS120
LhND SURvEY0R5 • GHL ENqNEERS �612� 6H1-� 914•�CX 881-9�4-8$
r:.-,�s -,.��:�.,,:n• • � •�•••..• —. �• • i'I:t�aiv'Ri1.
LANB PCAMNE�S • U►�BSCAPE ARC�+�TECTS � 625 Hlghwa 10 NOr{heast
� Bloine, MN 55434
• (612} 783 1880•Fox 783-1883
, �
. , � , .. , �. ..
Certificate of Survey for: g
House Address:
11
0
q 3Y� o
' a . �3' , j't
N 89'i 8'44" E
_ 92.68 uP�r,�,�
1
�, �������
� � �, w1���3
� ��
�i •' - � _`,� - -�-/- - - - - � --- --��
�i �. ' �� , 10 . �
�— 1�-.------ o�,---- : �-�_
� I_ ._ - �- _ ..__.. _._ _ . _t, ,
;i '
�' � �
�
�� 93� .� �l3.?•7
I g 3�•� i
��� .¢ X -�� - i
�'i'° � qal°I �-3�•� — � — — `
�,�T � �4.0 �, T �" za.4s �
II �I.�GV O _O tJ710.� ,
.,z.co.•. .''' ' 2�.ao `
{ �,,,;�•.. I
� �'�r�'PR�POSE4•HOUSE�..`'�•* �
�„��:12 CWRSE 8A5EMENT v I �
a � $: � ,r` r.:— — � �'ti3°;�ao,z.'1
o I �, . r, , - � To.s7 _
I� ('[ .� . ` pW";• " ' � r �r' N I
� `12Q'� 8.3�'it.33 GAkAGE , �
" � 93f.;t, . N' :; " - , • q�
.� y • ��
A; I , � Q .�'".:T ' �
• • v,, '•�N-10:00_ 7�,
1Tt�50 � — — — . 19'OOJ o �
��� K — �,' � � � QZJ J �
��.�•��. � �
�•�.L� � /
�— �
r�'.,�/,
Td• �z��l�
_.. ------------�,;� .
G ,`¢�, DRiVE�tiAY
_ Lt�J � ' _ — —
� 1 t�4�3��,?..��...
N 89'18'44" E.---
_ .. _ - -�--= -
SIBLEY COURT
0
�
0
NOTE: CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DlMENSIONS
THIS CERTiF1CATE DOES NaT PURPORT TO SHOW EASEMENTS '�; �'.
OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON RECORDED PI�AT, ' � •
. vo�iv�ao �n�.a�n.y �. •.+.w�� t'KVI'VJGU f'1VlJJG l. Yt'��iv�� ' ' -
= 9�v Denotes P�oposed Elevotion � Lowest �Ftoor Elevat on: 92;3. �; . .
.___ Denotes Droinage & Utility Easement 7op of Bloc�k EI_evat on: �3i.�� �
- Denotos Orainage F1ow Dlrection :.
� Denotes Morrument Garage Slnb Eleva# on: y3o.�q ,
—a— Denotes Oifset Hub Bearings shown are ossumed ,-• •••"" ,
LOT 10 , BLOCK � S{BLEY HE(GHTS �� -�:
::�
DAKOTA COUNTY, MIHHESflTA
. r t'•
1 hereby cerei(y that this iurvey, plan or report was praparad bY mo or under mY diract supervision and tli�t I ��+'� dul Rrgisttred land Survnyw ��
undpr the laws oi the State of Mlnnesota, Dated this gT1t day of - SV�C A.�. 19.�..�. "�
Cn a3 '�
', � n� Or�ni tj�.<,,,• i•; f,•,. ,i��f r l��i)a'�y%' � • � �� RcJisG.J �/��l/ . �
iCJ�sE� (�-11��3 4e��ss� p0.�cs6,0 atGv�'�o•.�S tGRREGT� � g'� '.i��
,a
1 T� 7S�"�CJ�' �ocA.� ' y:�
Scale, � inch_3Ofoe p �����q�IpNf R aRTa,siKic�i�. .REO.N0.1�891 ,•�e�
_ . _ ;: �
r ��. � - - �` - ; , ,
�'...'"'�� •a
. r�.��.s��,� . : .-. �... . . �.� .y _ .
� s��l� ou��- � � �'�� --
_ S7S � c �;
� ,.e.�( ,or:,����_L-:". -�4 .�� ��
- � .G�
tv�G�+<r�l / � `��
C�,-,pa �t . � � � � �
�� /� / Cra�.berrY �/', �y� '"�r � •
` � �
►�— �o T,�il,•• F
v v ' , �'4
j� .o-- �.. � a�y .../V,., i �
�,�J �--4r � . .��.C. \ ; (�� I ; � • ,a.�--�-�' ' �'��� � • ��
t'' r^�y�� �: � j . �---_..�.._ :c 'f �:" �� �������t � �_ � ,
=�� . 1 -. .. ----� � � ' '�r' , .:.��E.:_� �, : , �
� �' � .� �
�_,______— . .----- . - W --- ��� 1 �.. . � ��i � i
-� T - /' - - - � - ' - I - 1 I( , �� �' � - �^� '�_
� , ^ -- -: � - _. �,. ' � � I G ��: i-1-. ` ~' � � � - - : I �
s �'-y �.r � • e�:��_� "a ' �K.=�
. ._ � .:= � _ - P4��r - - ��.' r� �if3+`e �-e���� ��:�, � I
! � D.� C {� - �- . . ;�.. - : `�;---�a L � ,f
1 _ . �•'r, � N�rir yf•ld '�`.�=zr�s c�w --1— 5
I " _ _:__-_ _ � '� ��'� ����ti�T„` �� �v �r� �s'li�� � 1
�-^-----�p�� ! / J c�
_ • _ .. . ° ~` ;�.. �`,. W./a,.,,..,:d �'"'_ • = • � ' � , / i
- -- --- � �i - �= '��.�,�: - . .
� L�Y � , � ' � � i:� � i
.` ,
- --- --- - -.._ .... . . :.-1 « _ .� -
;
..._ - •-- • F��, � .
r,�
.. , �„
- --' - -�----- :� -. •.C....- ,--.-•4✓-; #, � ..._ .. _ �;� .. __ �-,- ----- �
. � �1
•'• r �' �T ¢ll, t f�r ' ��� • 1
- :71.... `...:..1 �F t`. `. J F¢"t� V/vi,�t: j', `� �
' Fra.,u,eE ' ' • • - � •.;V� , . - -� �
,/ -�� ��c- ,
np$�tl i � . , _ L (T, V � �
. - . �� �� __ _; -,�_�� y' ` -.\
.�, ,
l %� � ' •.�: I
' ' . � --' "_ ..�� _ .' � f. ` .-: e�� %��.
. " � ' - - _ �t �,� ` ,�' � «,_ e'� C -�T.�`P,j /�.�j''i �
_ .�^�-�,
- • � • ._ - ,! � �v; ��(, � (. ' �z.�,r.s.,..3,.,,p
�� �� - — - a �_ �: ,._.. -� �.,,� : ;�:aa�a.a
2'S � er�-c�, ��,..�.��. '•� �`W i�. �-� � _„ ,.,;...�.�-^;�.----�
�Os4�a i';`
Ff
• � ; ����n_C�2��S�e q:ei�a;� � .,�r�o"",,Q~
.,�`�°'``� .� ---- � ) , �
.r���w ..: -,.. ., .... _. .... ..... ..�-§ T ...1�i�t��rt,r—Li�l ±� , � � ;
4„`� � � ' .� .� 1
. .• � �.' �- � 7� �- �°- �-�" k b �??' S , � ,. .,. �4 w. ; r � '' l
''� r_c�t�.�1/ SP =Y .� �' �
4_���Fry� � �h� �.J'-� � 91 � e�l 1✓ � ! '`
� �'� � � ;
. p�• Ir� �
_. 09`,'�, I
. , ----� ,
, �~ . � . . - � _� � � �,�; , �
�.'�
M•- ' . � __<-;
,� :. �
. , �
��
� ,
� �/ .1"`'�
,, r
t1
,►�
• t
��i�l�� � •�� _ .�� ��,r�'1
• _ � � �I�r =- �
.�,� ,;�;� �-•�•�*�-- � �=� *+► .
t _ 1
i i�i� ♦ '_ � �
` � �.a
�. � � '
� - � ,� �
i • • y~ �,.+� � � �� � ��� �� '
�
N��' ' � i•i �" '�' � • 1�
n
� . ,.
^" '. - � : � � '! : - *�'�I�
,� a.� r .,tl�.� � � � � t
� �� � �� •ry '� �►
�.
fl.� � � • �i� �i ,. ..�
� ; � if•��� � � � ���
! � � � 1��� '
K
�
z �
... -. �'' �
`� � � � � % ��
;� �
..;;-, ;;�� � _
: -
,. �,� +� .
i i i �
� u •... wv`� T � - �
� -- . � . �,.i �
�.� - �.�.�
' N�
III ��
� �" \
'- �i�ii� j
�
/
170-04
\ � • ' $-36
- �i- _ ."7 , �i' `,�'�� � �
� �
�
�-
^ � � �
�/ �� � �
\ \
040-27 /� J _ _'y \ � '
,�,� �` O 1 T LOT 3-
� f 1 �
�� -- ---_-- =���'�� � �� � �"�' —
',Gr' � � \
r f !' .
` � �� `� � \ -36
� �� �
a � 1�
� V �
1..... � � �\� �
\
\ \ � \ � !^'
\
\ � V
t \
02Q-•28 /� �� �� \ 013-36
� � ��`� �
x �\
�`
. �� �
`\ \ \ 0
�
30-28 �� �t \
--- - S1'ATE �s ����=Ll,.�s i�
015-36
�
�._----- -����,,..�---� !�
�"`"-�4�
�IY�f�!7
I� U
-- -- o-•
i
i
oj
r a�
oA
0
0
0
O
O
Q
8,
O
O
O
n
0
a
0
0
a
O
� O
O
1
� �
000 .�,_��
Op
O
00
°oq'$ 40
0
4 Qa'q
I
�4����°�
o�
o�
o�.
a
8
� s' � " r r r s � „ "" r � � s ;► i .i y r ..r s r s w s r s . . . ♦ r.� � .. � . M r ♦ 1 .i .r r 1 � . r r .. �
s s t 7
� ` _ "� �v�� c� ��/ �/ �' �'��. �� �.�� .
r �
_,,,�, • • .� . .. « . i "" " . � .. .. �+ �^" ,. M o�_ �� � • ��r-r-..o�-�,.-r i ♦ r v �
- �t - --.)�' - =i�_ . ---���` X'"= X��';�`=5�' v ,� -_ � _' � _ _ _.=...--.�� -�.'t,,,,-y � .._ "�.� . • o u � 7 �C'; ,..� � c�� a�r.
��26 f —x-= .-� =;�'i��'�-���, ��^�-�;°--�{=-�. _1
r�;�� { � �n�. ''..—:...�-�--.-".'��-"�`
' � _ �`� �
� .-�z z—,
� �
�1�'��i����.�
����
�-+m.+r�+wrrc�qf�����T,_,�_��
�� �� ,J ���
�
0
i, j �
Y �M��U RV�E Y{.� F� �.S ��i � �.T �..F i,CAT,� �.. :" �_ �. DA�-iL.STRC3M� pE iGNER , HOMES �
. i� . , . .� , : �`
, • � . _ }��:�' • • ' � ,,%� ' � , • 5 �. ��+��t,�1� '
. . .��. ' ' . , 'x`'. :� . ... . . . . , , ; . - �, ..'_ �
. . . ' {� ��'1 . , � . ` , � �. • , : . . .
- ' . k.» 11 1 . • . .
t ' ,.,:, . • \� .,.:.,;a���,�ii:;r • ' . . . ., r. .. : ,;,..;. s, �
..:5�'x�` � ^� �ii:;��':`.a ' ' ; � 1 � , • � ' ' , ��� I
S:IS'� , . ' , :dt`:;� i, , r� � � � ,�
' . . , , . . _ � ' . „ �:� . . 'I
i � 1 �',i � • � � ' ' . ' � ; . S � ' . •�' ','i^' , r' i�,
� , • • , • , ' Y� . . . � � , ; �.�1� �f. l±,l .+•.�
�+�.4 � �t.
•, � NO R TH 1���►� �.,. � C H E RRY :� H 1 L l� '��{.
. � s�a, .- 35. 00 `� . �2 � -� . . ; , .. < . . ..
,,. _ R G�.A �: .�.-
. / I, u� a , . r ', . < : e4Z 29 : ; � , " , ..... . - `';�' • .
���10 . - . � ? , '' • ; �, , ,
` v� • � . ; ; . . ..� • � ' � � .
\./ . � ` .. ` �'� ,. ' . t � ' . . 71 . .
.. ` �� ��� � � , , M1 �
1 a"� � •,� (� • " . , �, ', • '• C f: . ,
, �: �'� 84T. 3 �; � • • . '•� ; .� ;.: .
. :1L � , �. '
. �
r •
♦
,
_ , � �``! . . 1849.T ' ' : `
� o . , �g4q. �. � � .
, � � ' . '. .: : ;�. . ,�~ � : ,..., ,
„ y- � o � a�ivEw�r `� . ` �� . �a � ; . � .. , . �.,��, .
W• r�.^`, • . ' �i�'+!j ` ' r`y , , � � , �
� t ~ ` � � � � � . ` ` 3 � �` • � ✓ ,
' . � � M '�'° �i 4.0 � } k � �<$ / �� . g . ;�.,+: �. : :� ��;ao �;, .: °,, �:,::I:
. � �3 S � � �'�' N: �°� g'��`�' '{ �: .;
. � . �, J „�9 : � �y'; ' l•}, J �r '
G� ♦ 1 � l . V �.. 1 � . •
; ; .,� ,� / . � !V� � +�``� � . ' a �;�. ;; �
, � � ��..�����
j �'� y� ��`� �o t ,
� � o � � ARQpOs� r , , . � f M : ' ,� . . ,
' 864.8 �'_`�?$r� t � h�u'�r'nn? C 'a� ��t�!'' .�. ' � �'�•' .:'' , .�,c
g . . 1, o�,c / • ' � o o a .;, �� ; : . � w
� � � ss4 K�' � i g� � � M. p • �' � . � . .,'' ', : '. ' ;; 'i,
0 S�o� � • . 3•.gl} �8��.y,,' � ; tt . � • .. ' '�,:����:,,°�:�;
�4 � � s � ��.rt, N ��Y7.i �- :+ i : :.p•. . �rPl��r�?.f� ,
,� . , x ,� '' • : :,::_:;:.:f, ,
'♦ "#: ` 1 �:�..
S Q • ��„�.9 � �,� ���.� , ! �'. `;; .
N � ��—�^ ;'i•r�;.� '�,
. � . � � . �....{�� � �s',3 : � � . . . . �.:..�,�.4 ��',. :t'�. };.
�z� � :,� �. :�;� 't� � .
. ; . 5 . . .. .. .w , .;�... .�;�� �:. � . ;;:�: ;
:.,��. "�.�,:,��
, , •�.L � . }` t>1
+ . a � . ':
��a�NacE a uri�i rY � � � : t . • ..'�': ' . ' .
E ASEIVl�NT PE R PI.A T ., , r • . . • , '-`�,.; , ' . �, �
, , . . , J . ..{, :j1.� . �'�; +
, � � ..�.�.,..� ' a • , � ; .. �. �; ; ; . .
. � j" ,.
. ti 4 . .' ' 4 • ��! $rj,�, � � • . . .
,, l ,
. , (4585 � . . • fj . . • • �s
� . 95.00 NORTH � . � • ��r �
� . . � . . . � �
. , . . . . . , � ; . . ., ,
� J , . � � . , � i , , • ' �
1� I I" � � �' � 1`r . r,,.,, �1 1` �� •� ~^ 1 1w I� 1 ` � •J. r :�.
��,-�,�.�, ► � �_ �.^�-�: � ,,�,-1L� � .1 �.✓ �J. r-� ��, � ��,.,��s , . . r:. , �.� �_
. .. .. . = 1. .
.r . � � . � � . +y�� )
. . � � . ' . ' • . . . . . � r� t . • 1 . ' 1 i,� 1 j' .. ' �i
. . 1' 1 , ' , � ' 1 � 1 � • • ( . . i. , . f r, •Y .I t .
+ S . , . • 1 • ,�t��;'•
` ' w�.r . w..�w.r�.. �+..�- '� . . , . . . � , t j t' i � .. : � . .t r i
��,,, . ; : �"! ' . � •' ' ', �
j• . . . ' ' .�....:� ' , • . .t:! . �:�. Y+ :,.
' . � ' � � SCAL� � I INCH �. �0 FEET � . . ' t'�. ; � .. �: r'�• . ;
. � . � � � . � . . . . . � �' . . . ' ; �. .
, . • � ,i f � . , . �, �,. ;;:,} �.;, ,�.
�.�"1�S R�. �1 `: C1 . . : .�,
. . . . . .. ... r..;� . . . . . .. . .
PLANNER� /. ENGINEERS /. S. RVEY4�S
2b00 W. C`�Y, RD.: 42, • BURNSVILLE, MN. 5533 • 612-88A-QQ4�¢
� �. .. . .1. . - .l� � r�: ,j:r . . �. � �� � �h';��,�Y+�•::�..�ir' Ib�:�l . �1. . . . , .,.�.r .�.. �,
� � . . � .r��.l . � , , ...,
, / . ; . . , • I� :i;;: . . . .
.
�
/id
i / �i
///0,./
i/n
1
1 1
/////
/ ///////
// III //
// / L //////oaf
// • l l! 1 1 / l
// •� l/r Ill�ll
/ / rI, I
/ij� ///o////// i /1
!/ 1
l/ l/lI \\ 1/// //!111/11
ll1/lel /1/,
I/JI J /,WT/1
l l i l 1� f,/
11//111/!o
Ilnl!IiolIIpl
10,3,1//1/1/11
IIII iiii,,!I l
11,111(11/l1l
II Ii illil!bII
II \ 1101:2111!,?,,
C� -\ Ilell13lilrlI
1?!f' 11°01) rn1 1 lol I1
rffIi�1111111T1ii:1 111111'111
1
l11.'I 11 111InlI1
rI II111111217111
()U • III )111111 III
1--11 1 I iii ! I IL
Q11 11 I .0
III" m 112
120 11 1 Ililt T 11I
II ,111 'III 1 1 III
II ' II I
1 R 1ml 1
111 I1.% c IT!. I 1 1ni
II I11I1 ill ISI
II 11 II Ill II
Ill
lip I l 1 IIT I II �\
1 i4 it' III iI
1l} llwl lt; l0, \
II 111ilnl1110) 1\ \
II I I II II
��illi ta111yt \\ \
-50
co-vc�/i1/
9-s Inc 1
N
N
\ N
N
0
J
CSO
�.0 F%,.
FN
466, yo‘
4.‹). ,
• Os .4
/
/
/
/
/
N
4350
U
til 1 1i til 11i1�1c \
i II t � 11 „
ail IIt �ti X111 \ \\
i I \
II 1 11111ill It11mtltllt \ �\
i! t�It11ti \ sfl
liII 1 moil J l I l \ \
It1 1 atl.-ii 1t it1 \
\ \
! t rpt \
\\
`' 1 il�°ItI0
lltl°'11\ \ \ \ I
III coi II 1 1 itli 111111j 0 1IcP\ ' '\
II 011 i It11
It
�t11111il 11171.1 r11l111 t1 & \ I \ �N �s 1
l (ti lilltlltll \ �N �\
II 1 I l \ \
1 I l I y 1 t�,1111,11 l\ cN \— �� \\ '�s
I 11 =It l \ 9 \ \\
l I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 '. \ \____-.___, •. so . \ \ \ 3
i
�1111111i11S,1\ `—\\\=\ `N \ \\ \�\=
- )1 l I t 11 1 1 1 - _` -865 \ 44 Zss� \ \ ,mss,
11 t 1 t "' I 1 \ \ y _ �es8 _
( ;1°'1I�`\ `` 869 ` =� -__ — `-„ 1_ ___-859• _ �-V
`� 1 \l1\ \ .. --- — 66 = - ^—esi_
\\I
J
--855
59 —
rx
933.
al $‘0.-‘31x-
Z.zokatirvizrz, 12L4,14
c:3 TkOPt
_ eic1_04
(5101f"
r-+s-r',&Or-iit
1451
1 38
1131
ail
3$'
1 s
cr 31,
OAK
‘7,e-6-71 0 H -
=
2 ;el
).)
''7017
A \A--)
\
0/\K
Vso
Vo
'
rt.
1
HOTT!:.
4f34,RT 41-C7
.11
4 1(4 fre.446,a-
7
0
1
1
1
uir
6, ‘..-A&
LL
0
40' -.6s1 • ri)Aelt.
40' ‘7V.-1
6300 Highway 36
Oakdale, MN 55128
(612) 770-1391 • FAX (612) 770-4089
67-40c-Wrzitlz-
6
r
L-tfl 11;;10.
yk" ..\.D
— — —
o 565
•
-mITTIM
w*co fe,4*1. 11.04
•
Mir
.0-- a.,
---;,.,
I.
11
S1.44.1,A)
Ito(
11t.1..
1ijr—
1,11 TI 111
1111
vf... LILO
-i-- Ig -71,1 4
1--
-1_--- f__-_-____-1------
16. kg -C 5 io e.
• Vek= C).
Tla *0 15.1 /5i b*.*,1/4 or -W.5 11-6,4k0 4034.
(.5,0 v4PcAt
Mkba(ner. kke*.*-1,-
P .64# •1***4 6 44 — 11% I ...10.04,4 ssortlet,,
42f.r.
••••
Z-;
"el
'2*.g ' '
•
iV( f1.4.
b*1
1Si rst-
0, too '‘At :•t•
7-*
-0
2.4 tsp.
_
r...•0‘./C 4.441
C-(10 A f•-i•••••A-C.-..-
FIC444`; 43 !et ---r
4-4 Mfr
A.4,4 1.10
40.4 4 k4•••1 -
e -f
_42 f:
rlfllTTIF
.1J•i.-+at•t•S
40 1••••••
2.,:"..:::‘: ....;:-.
,:•;'27 i ,‘....,_.F.44441...r.... 11
.14 4 41. •••
..,.. 4.4..4/044 F4,4,„..1
I 7 1 i t
r ; r
za b i LI i
...,
.Z '''
'244 -;
-.1 •
i1'.4%' 4., .4 I
\
i
DIM
5 51 DI
1[110
4
F 12-0,41
=1:611.1S-
- —
------
I•14
—
hIgvct. •
./ 11/4.-VItak.ror-
C.
tisu. 11-.2•wes.
4„.....0.1 .41.1/ IAA) 1•1/1:04•444
(.I1 to-. .44T C4
4.
1 9, 4.•.- -i••••4•G
L
;)
I.
1.44CA4
- . .
.,-
-1-(1.4.0 /5.11” ps, 4.,040.4
, R.4 AVG.
01.F. 1•I
• ..1.1.1.+4-1 6 AI- %%it 54-21o'
tie Ai. 4'o -'5-t.(..
I-• •
••••4G. 41% k
_-CI-, 4444
r • 4.
C.F.
n
1 ,LI -1 tw a Fir W rta
et -17 ,e)
5g,16., 60.34
1.0./.1.,4 ?yr,. 4(!(444.
.1c•
Ola_ �.Loob�
nnrL' u-i.n.ruLazin-w 7
n � n ruL1-1-nn n n ri I nnn^n
q 5 9s
W0.1 • !y4. 2
..�.... r ,..1
11.1 (.0.
• •
Ttm4
I
a+K-r Wa- 2
- - J I
— — - - --.
-
>J�
bl I
O O
1 r'. -
i
11.-s Won-
.......
on-
7.9.0016] /StI+..OapS 0341.
ttTrr •- %So W.L•t TvE.O� p-'-
P al. Mat
11/4214E,,• H 641-lu\-Jw1tt, Sj 'D* -110`1
NOM. t50 -S42(0
y-,• 7.0 t;<,w 81ti-1s
P•�
or
ID
__.
+__._�
—) 0.010
�.
a+K-r Wa- 2
- - J I
— — - - --.
-
>J�
bl I
O O
1 r'. -
i
11.-s Won-
.......
on-
7.9.0016] /StI+..OapS 0341.
ttTrr •- %So W.L•t TvE.O� p-'-
P al. Mat
11/4214E,,• H 641-lu\-Jw1tt, Sj 'D* -110`1
NOM. t50 -S42(0
y-,• 7.0 t;<,w 81ti-1s
P•�
or
ID
„017 ,2g0 S
S8'Z,�
/
/
/ /
/' 501`ld .L11s
/
/ V
3 /n00 ,60
z
a
J
V
4144.
•
!' /r ---4L9---
r
.57N3d 1.119
EROSION GONTlgoL PLAN
SURFACE DRAINAGE
7
7
7
/_,
CC� r�1'1
T
7
Li
50 0 25 50
SCALE
IN
2»
100
FEET
l
1
\
—r o—f'— —
EXIST
SAN MH
TR = 885.84-
871-90
85.8487/-90
eN
1
N89°27'40"E
/28.90
lV \
06
1 \�
0
1/ r
c_ V t_
EXIST. SAN Mi -1€
.4 WAC! -/PEER EVERGREEnI.
4,
l CLEAN -p -
_
r• (7,U e� G - 4 /
/V
Ase 4
1/0
r
68 0
30
0"
o"g.
\21"
0 0\
• \'0 0400
1
N
•
01
01
/90.00
J
rages -ro BE REMOVED
(°"- poplar
5"_ poplar-
4"-
oplar4"- poplar
b"- poplar-
To
oplarTo SE REPLACED kitTI_-4
35 :/.." 3 "- 4" spruce and pine
w/ s' spacing f as shown above
3-5"elm
0
O
- 6 s.�
AP
1,11111111a1#1401
my Idplul Nw llp1111•161111100wrimirai " uF..
ec
'-00
GOL F
/
0\
11
S 8•°29' 35" W
20 - 3"-4" Spruce and pine/
Si TE- GRADING - LANDSCAPE
YA ASINIDOUNINIT
COURSE
/2786
lea m!u•�V[ a•ti _ti'. '4Yma ice'.` wlR"'. •,a,,c- •.P^.* 5»
DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION
DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION
DENOTES DIRECTION OF FLOW OF
SURFACE DRAINAGE
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
LOWEST FLOOR. 875.0 k
GARAGE FLOOR 883. 4
TOP OF FOUNDATION- 883.75
NOTE- VERIFY 5ANITA2y
SERV/CE ELEVATION
PRiog. Tr) ESTABLIsr-GING
LOwES7 Ftoole. &RADE
DETAIL.
I"= 30'
8-7-95
•
U
1—Itao
" z
a) q) z
ai
U-
ON
O O
5301 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD
O)
co
a)
N
1
a y
0
V)
z
z
a
z
0
w
DRAWN
ChECKED
I FEREBY CERTFY THAT THS PLAN, SPECFICATION
OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED
LAID SURVEYOR UNDER TIE LAWS OF TIE
%TATE OF :TA.
i
DATE RFpSTRATION NO. t *37 t
4EET TTRE
CEPTIFICATE OF SUPVEY
PROJECT:
OUTLOT A, EVERGREEN KNoLLs / 5r ADDITION
for JANICE SIMMONDS
88131/93
DALE/28
/28 /93 8125193
1 / 2 / 93 8 7-95
PROJECT
1162
No.
SHCET NO1
DAHLSTROM DESIGNER
.SURVEYOR'S
J
Z
00
IS113 00-011-
OO'£ i
\SLS 3 M
S
N
2
0I
S zZ
cl
O /so0 —U
a z
/� am
te)1 -.; o w
C
/ _44;
Y
m 00' 00Z
J
Oi$
tri
it
w
w
11.M
IS
U
z
w
U
N
•
C.J
C
•
Cli)
w
z
z
ct
2500 W. CPI', RD. 42 • BURNSVILLE, MN. 55337 • 612-890-8044
DRAWN BY
SHP
DATE
10-27-92
REVISIONS
BOOK/PAGE
PROJECT NO.
92636
FILE NO.
FOLDER
SHEET 2 OF 2
.os = 4j— NV -1d 31IS
'ON 133HS
- S
0
P
0
c
In
rn
0
6
0
G
0
1
II
tr
k 0
\S 17, S
+ A' An
1
N/�.■
ARCHITECTS
NORDBY & ASSOC., INC.
245 EAST ROSEIAWN AVE. SUITE 30
(612) 487-3281 ST. PAUL, MN 55117
i
-q.
ALLAN LANDREVILLE
1010 Highway 13
Mendota Heights, Minnesota
i
A
'ens — NOI103S 11VM
GARAGE PLANS — Scale: 1/8" = 1L -O^
m
Qr-
2
NV1d 3OOH
NOIJMA313
R
r
f'•=71-
'
—=
0
•Tt
0
iOE =“L :€41/33S -NY1d RLIS
'ON 133HS
0
Wpm
N.
\
t
h
r
/
a
,./
-<
t's-
\)--
\\
ARCH! TECTS
NORDBY & ASSOC., INC.
245 EAST RO•ALAWN AVE SUITE Si)
(612) 487 1261 S • • I N'; 'II/
7-"
In
x
a
a.
I \ N
1.7
ALLAN LANDREVILLE
1010 Highway 13
Mendota Heights, Vnnesotl
n
rn
0'
II
T.
0
C
rn
r
p
r
rri
p.
0
IS 31-i12.10N
rti
F-
rui
t
(st
s
0
0-4
m
t, 9 ,
.ott
rn („?
• 0
N E t
#
. • r 4
47 -joy,
-------
1—
C;
-47
z.
-4
TA 01.1V A 3.7
8%—SI
(-0
--114
•
7:3
-13
0
C
n
Ii
t
p
11#
p
Ii
z
n
m
C\ION.I_VI\37-13
7
ID
-paacrici ana.1 riAsv s!
1J:
2 CAR DETACHED GARAGE
and SWIMMING POOL
0'
I hereby certify that this plan, specification,
COMM. NO. 52 9 5
or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision andtt,,,) am a duly
Riegiostera, aU • er the laws of
A 0
14-16- Registration No1541 7
-
DRAWN BY
DateS
DATE r\ licit. 19 I 9 ci
1.1.••111. 4111mnionlft.
' soak/ g
0
9g.""1"--
1
t
1
i
i
40.
p
01.4.04
41••••• ••••••444.
IP.. 14
•
t
1
•
i
a
f
I
\•
i
r
•
I
i
•
\
t
z
I
1
1
•
^. r
•
4-
•
•
r
•
•,
\\
\\ \ l \\
/1.
fr
/ 11.00 c/ r
� t
/
.
41/
,
'/�li•/