1994-10-18CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAROTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
October 18, 1994 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption
4. Approval of October 4 Minutes
5. Consent Calendar
C�
7.
a. Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's Report for Se
b. Acknowledgment of the Fire Department Rep
September.
c. Acknowledge Receipt of the Unapproved Minutes
September 7, 1994 NDC-4 meeting.
d. Acknowledgment of the October 11 Parks and Re
Commission Minutes.
e. Acknowledge Receipt of Sewer Utility Rate Infor
f. Approval of Equipment Certificate Resolution - RB
NO. 94-70 and G.O. Revenue Bonds Resolution - RE
N0. 94-71.
g. Approval of Resolution Accepting Work and Approv�
Payment for 1994 Street Overlay Project - RESOLL
94-72.
h. Approval of Request for Sign Permit - GNB
Technology - 1110 Highway 110.
i. Approval of Request for Temporary Banner Sign - B
Boutique.
j. Acknowledgment of the October 12 Airport R
Commission Minutes (Available Monday). ,
k. Approval of the List of Contractors. '•
1. Approval of the List of Claims.
m. Approval to Purchase One Mobile Data Terminal.
I
End of Consent Calendar
Public Comments
Proelamation
a. Proclamation Regarding Violence Prevention
8. Presentation
a. Third Annual Fire Awards
r
,
?tember.
�rt f or
`rom the
:reation
nation.
30LIITION
30LIITION
ng Final
PION NO.
Battery
jorklund
�lations
9. IInfinished and New Business
a.
b.
* c.
*
Discuss Firefighter Explorer Program.
Discussion on Kensington Manor Homes Roadway Condemnation
- RESOLt7TION NO. 94-73
Discuss Case No. 94-23: Metro II Variance - RESOLIITION
NO. 94-74
d. Discuss Pentel Consultant Contract Extensions.
e. Discuss Request to Acquire Curley Property.
f. Discuss MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan Alternative
Environmental Document.
g. Acknowledge Receipt of MnDOT Letter -- Mendota
Interchange Road Noise Concerns.
h. Discussion of 1995 ANIl�! Legislative Policies.
10. Council Comments
11. Adjourn to Closed Session to Discuss Labor Negotiations.
Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request
at least 120 hours ia �dvance. If a aotice of less than 120
hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every
attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible
oa short aotice. Please contact City Administration at
452-1850 with requests.
A
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 18, 1994
i
�
!
T0: � Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for October 18 Council Meeting
Additional information is submitted for items 9c an�
3. Agenda Adoption
f
It� is recommended that Council adopt the revis
printed on yellow paper.
9c. Discuss Case No. 94-23: Metro Ii Varianee -
RESOLIITION NO. 94-74
Please see attached revised Resolution.
9h. Discussioa of 1995 Ab�i Legislative Policies
Please see attached information.
MTL : }tkb
I
9h ,(*) .
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAROTA COIINTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
October 18, 1994 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption
4.
5.
�
7.
Approval of October 4 Minutes
Coasent Calendar
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g-
h.
i.
J-
k.
l.
m.
Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's Report for S�ptember.
Acknowledgment of the Fire Department Report'I for
September. �
Acknowledge Receipt of the Unapproved Minutes from the
September 7, 1994 NDC-4 meeting. �
Acknowledgment of the October 11 Parks and Recreation
Commission Minutes. ;
Acknowledge Receipt of Sewer Utility Rate Information.
Approval of Equipment Certificate Resolution - RESOLIITION
NO. 94-70 and G.O. Revenue Bonds Resolution - RESOLIITION
NO. 94-71. !
Approval of Resolution Accepting Work and Approving Final
Payment for 1994 Street Overlay Project - RESOLUTION NO.
94-72.
Approval of Request for Sign Permit - GNB! Bat,tery
Technology - 1110 Highway 110.
Approval of Request for Temporary Banner Sign - Bjorklund
Boutique. � I
Acknowledgment of the October 12 Airport Relations
Commission Minutes (Available Monday). I,
Approval of the List of Contractors. ' '�,
Approval of the List of Claims. '
Approval to Purchase One Mobile Data Terminal. �
End of Consent Calendar
Public Comments
Proclamation
a. Proclamation Regarding Violence Prevention
8. Presentation
a. Third Annual Fire Awards
�
9. IInfinished and New Business
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Discuss Firefighter Explorer Program.
Discussion on Kensington Manor Homes Roadway Condemnation
- RESOLIITION NO. 94-73
Discuss Case No. 94-23: Metro II Variance - RESOLIITION
NO. 94-74
Discuss Pentel Consultant Contract Extensions.
Discuss Request to Acquire Curley Property.
f. Discuss MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan Alternative
Environmental Document.
g. Acknowledge Receipt of MnDOT Letter -- Mendota
Interchange Road Noise Concerns.
h. Discussion of 1995 AN�! Legislative Policies.
10. Council Comments
11. Adjoura to Closed Session to Discuss Labor Negotiatioas.
Auxiliary aids for disabled persoas are available upon request
at least 120 hours in advaace. If a notice of less thaa 120
hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every
attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible
on short notice. Please contact City Admiaistration at
452-1850 with requests.
w
�
Page No. 4161
October 4, 199�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, October 4, 1994
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regulaz meeting of the City Council, City of l
Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heig
�
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following mem
present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Huber, and Krebsbach. Councilmember ;
attending a MAC/MASAC meeting and had notified the Council that she would be late.
Councilmember Koch had notified Council that she would be absent.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Ayes: 3 .
Nays: 0
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption of the
for the meeting.
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
Councilmember Huber moved approval of the mi
September 6, 1994 regular meeting.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Minnesota.
were
i was
agenda
of the
CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Krebsbach moved approval of the consent calendar
for the meeting, revised to move items c, f, g, and i to the regulaz
agenda, along with authorization for execution of any necessary
� documents contained therein.
a. Aclaiowledgment of the Fire Department monthly ieport for
August.
,�
b. Adoption of Resolution No. 94-67, "RESOLiTTION
ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL
PAYMENT FOR ASSOCIATED BUREAUS (MENDOTA
HEIGHTS BUSINESS PARK 4TH ADDITIOI�,"�
improvements.
c. Approval of a variance to allow St. Thomas Acad�
operate a motorized pontoon on Rogers Lake for 1
of conducting tests and obtaining lake samples, su
times and dates specified in the St. Thomas Acadf
dated September 12, 1994 and subject to the class
the results of the tests to the City Council.
ry to
; purpose
ect to the
.y request
Page No. 4162
October 4, 1994
d. Aclmowledgment of the Code Enforcement monthly report for
September.
e. Authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a
"Contract for Water Service Between the Board of Water
Commissioners of St. Paul, Minnesota, the City of Mendota •
Heights and the City of Mendota."
f. Authorization for Russell Wahl to conduct the annual
Halloween Bonfire along with authorization for a city
- r contribution of $350 for expenses for the activity and
• authorization for local businesses to participate subject to
approval by Russell Wahl.
g. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the September 27, 1994
Planning Commission meeting.
h. Authorization to issue a purchase order to Grossman
Chevrolet for $10,621.75 to purchase a 1993 Pontiac Grand
Pri1c for the Code Enforcement Department.
i. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated October 4,
1994 and attached hereto.
j. Approval of the list of claims dated October 4, 1994 and
totaling $333,504.83.
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
METRO II FENCE PERMIT Council acknowledged a memo from Code Enforcement Officer
Berg regarding an application from Metr0.II for a permit to construct
a 48" high chain link fence around the play area at its facility at 1300
Mendota Heights Road.
Councilmember Krebsbach asked whether businesses in the area aze
aware of the proposal for a plain chain link fence. She sta.ted that
she wants to be sure that Northland Insurance has no objection to it.
Administrator Lawell responded that the owners of Northland
Insurance aze aware that the School District will occupy part of the
building and the play structure has already been installed.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he has spoken to Dale Glowa, who is
aware of the fence. He pointed out that the School District has a
three yeaz lease and Council gave them approval to conduct classes
' Page No. 4]
October 4, 1
and extended day care in the building. He stated t
� no objection to whether it is a galvanized chain lin
� clad vinyl, Council can direct the City Administra�
United Properties to see what they prefer and then
� School District.
Councilmember Huber moved to approve the issua:
permit at Metro II consistent with the direction to c
� District, Northland Insurance and Dale Glowa with
fence coating.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
t if Council has
fence or black
r to contact
�ntact the
of a fence
ict the School
pect to the
CASE NO. CAO 94-03, Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works Director
WERTHAUSER Daniel'son regarding modified critical azea site plan approval for Mr.
j Art Werthauser for a single family home proposed to be constructed
� at 1024 Sibley Memorial Highway.
� J
Councilmember Krebsbach felt that all critical area requests should
. go through the Planning Commission even if they do not require
variances because the critical axea needs to be developed as cazefully
as possible. She did not feel that it is appropriate to place critical
' area requests on the consent calendar. �
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the Critical Area O
require Planning Commission review of modified
ordinance amendment would be required.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that she feels the c
be amended since there have been issues in the comr.
structures that were approved without going through
Commission. She felt the city should be as careful a
development of the critical area and that e�ach proper
another.
Mr. Werthauser gave Council an overview on his req
that when he applied for a building permit he was ad�
lot is in the Mississippi River corridor and he would �
review by city staff. The plan was reviewed by Publi
Director Danielson and as a result he was told that he
the home so it complies with the Critical Area Ordin�
explained that the plan was revised to meet the condi�
recommended by Mr. Danielson and stated that the st
back 200 feet, will blend in well with the corridor. H
Council that he hopes to insta.11 two retaining walls fc
each other, a five foot wall and a three foot wall, and
�nce does not
plans and an
ce should
over
possible in the
► impacts
;st, stating
�ed that the
;ed plan
Works
nust design
ce. He
icture, set
informed
r feet from
�s been
Page No. 4164
October 4, 1994
advised that a variance is required for the shorter wall. He stated
that he will apply to the Planning Commission for the variance and
will conshuct a 55 foot long, five foot tall cast in place modular
retaining wall along the west property line. He explained that the
three foot wall is not necessary for the construction of the home but
he would like to have a flat area through which he can get to his
back yazd instead of having to go through the gara.ge.
Councilmember Huber moved to authorize the issuance of a building
pernut to construct a single family home at 1024 Sibley Memorial
.- Highway, along with waiver of the hearing and critical axea
� application fee, with the understanding that the applicant is only
authorized to build one retaining wall and no guarantee is given that
there will be any approval of a variance for a second wall.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
CASE NO. CAO 94-04, Council acknowledged a memo from the Public Works Director
BJORKLUND regarding an application for critical area site plan review for a home
proposed to be constructed by Richard Bjorklund, Jr., at 1147
Orchard Place.
Ayes: 3
Nays: U
Mr. Bjorklund informed Council that he is not asking for any
variances from the zoning or critical area ordinances and
understands that as long as a 40 foot setback from the bluffline is
maintained he is not required to appear before the Planning
Commission.
Public Works Director Danielson informed Council that Mr.
Bjorklund will install silt fences to protect the bluff from erosion.
He explained that there has been the opportunity within the Critical
Area Ordinance that developments which totally complies with the
ordinance to come directly to Council for �pproval.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that she feels the neighbors should
have an opportunity to see what is proposed.
Councilmember Huber moved to authorize the issuance of a building
pernut to constxuct a single family home at 1147 Orchard Place, to
waive the public hearing and to authorize refund of the critical area
application fee.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Councilmember Krebsbach sta.ted that her concern over the critical
area site plan review process is that adjacent property owners do not
' '',
Page No. 4:
October 4, 1
have the opportunity to comment and be informed and that all of the
homes in the critical area impact each other differently that they
would on a standard lot. �
: Mayor Mertensotto directed to review the matter an
report and recommenda.tion to Council as to under �
i Council should refer these matters to the Planning C
i stated a change in the procedure would require mod
, ordinance and if a hearing were required, applicants
submit abstractors' certificates to identify properties
LJNIFORM CURFEW . Council acknowledged and discussed a memo and
resolution from Police Chief Delmont regazding a
' Dakota. County Attorney for support for a county-�
1
Ayes:3 ;
Nays: 0
to make a
iat conditions
mmission. He
ying the
�ould need to
�ithin 350 feet.
�st from the
curfew.
After discussion, Councilmember Huber moved adoption of
Resolution No. 94-68, "A RESOLIJTION SUPPORTING
DAKOTA COUNTY JWENII,E CURFEW ORDII� ANCE."
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
PLANNING COMMISSION Council acknowledged a letter from Dr. Stephen F
APPOINTMENT Council of his desire to resign from the Planning (
• Council also aclaiowledged a memo from Admini
background information from candidates who had
for appoinhnent in July.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0.
Councilmember Huber moved to accept Dr. Hunter's
with regret and to direct staff to send him a letter of a
his dedicated service to the city.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
� informing
ussion.
r Lawell and
interviewed
�ignation
reciation for
Mayor Mertensotto stated that at the time �hat intervi I ws were
; conducted, Council had indicated that because of the quality of the
� applications, the candidates would be considered for the next
; Commission opening. He recommended that one of the candida.tes,
Sally Lorberbaum, be appointed to serve the unexpire�d term of Dr.
� Hunter. �
Councilmember Krebsbach moved to appoint Sally :
the Planning Commission, effective immediately, to
Hunter's unexpired term. �
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
m to
Dr.
Page No. 4166
October 4, 1994
PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Dan Rostratter, 2483 Stockbridge Road, and Mr. Roy Diehl,
� 2501 Stackbridge Road, presented the Council with a petition
opposing construction of a picnic shelter/structure in the North
Kensington Park. Mr. Rostratter summarized the reasons why the
= home owners object to the shelter and informed Council that the
owners of 65 of the 74 occupied homes in the Brentwood and �
Kensington neighborhoods signed the petition and five of the
owners were not available to sign.
The Council accepted the petition and directed staff to prepare an
investigation, report and recommendation on how to handle the
petition (referral to Park Commission, etc.).
PENTEL VARIANCE Council acknowledged a memo from the City Administrator
regarding consideration of the Pentel antenna variance application.
Council also acknowledged a memorandum from Eric Nystrom, the
city's legal counsel in the Pentel matter.
Mayor Mertensotto asked Mr. Nystrom to speak on the procedural
history of the variance application.
Mr. Nystrom informed the audience that he is one of the attorneys
involved in the matter on behalf of the city, and has been
representing the city in litigation in connection with this variance
application. He informed the audience that in 1991, when Ms.
Pentel made application for the variance, she had an existing beam
antenna that was up illegally. Council was awazd of the FCC
regulatory order, PRB-1, which required the minunum practicable
regulation of antennas and reasonable accommodation of ham radio
operators. Under those circumstances, Council looked at the issue
and determined that there were a lot of safety concerns associated
with the antenna that was requested and granted a conditional use
pemut for the existing antenna. The matker went into litigation at
that point. The federal district court accepted the city's position that
what it had done in considering the variance application, in terms of
considering the safety issues and being award of the requirements of
the federal regulation, had reasonably accommodated Ms. Pentel by
giving her a conditional use permit to allow her to keep her existing
structure which was at that time illegal. The matter was taken up to
the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals which reversed the judgment
that the city had obtained in its favor at the district court level. He
explained that the current status is that the city is obligated under the
circuit court order to consider Ms. Pentel's variance application, is
required to make factual findings, and following that some absent
some sort of approval, Council is required by the terms of the order
to negotiate and explore a comprise that occurred when the matter
was last taken up with Council and that Council has engaged Dr.
�
Page No. 4167
October 4, 199�
Dubois and Mr. Jillson to provide expertise so that Council can be
fully informed as a factual matter as to the enginee i g and
communication issues.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that neighborhood residents have asked
him why the applicant is asking for a 72 high foot tower now w�en
the original application was for 68 feet. �
Mr. Nystrom responded that he understands that the
asking for has a maximum height of 72 feet. Under
variance application, regardless of what the practica
extending the tower to 72 feet is, she has asked Cou
68 feet. He stated that it is not his understanding, gi
file with the city right now, that she is seeking to go
even though the tower she has purchased would do 1
Mayor Mertensotto asked Mr. John Bellows, legal
Pentel to state for the audience what Ms. Pentel is
do.
Mr. Bellows responded that Ms. Pentel's existing an
vertical antenna, a single mono pole of aluminum, aa
asking council to do is approve an application to pen
a tower with a horizontal, beam, directional antenna.
markedly improve her capability to communicate as
radio operator. He informed Council that Ms. Pentel
licensed amateur radio operator and as such falls wit
of federal regulation PRB-I. He stated that the genei
amateur radio activities is for recreational purpose bi
spends the majority of time as an amateur radio oper
service activities where she works with various grou�
National Disaster Medical System. He in€ormed the
this group is a purely volunteer operation which pro�
capability of radio communications in disaster situati
of public service.
Mayor Mertensotto asked if there are other facilities
twin cities area. Mr. Bellows responded that there a
none available at her place of residence.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he has been asked by a
would be possible for her, rather than have a free-star
have the type of antenna that she is seeking mounted
house.
:ower she is
he existing
capability of
cil to consider
�en what is on
ibove 68 feet
,1 for Ms.
the city to
enna. is a
d what she is
ut her to erect
hat would
�n amateur
is a federally
in the umbrella
�l nature of her
t she also
tor in public
s, mostly the
�udience that
�des the
�ns as a matter
iailable in the
but there are
neighbor if it
3ing tower, to
ieht on the
Page No. 4168
October 4, 1994
Mr. Bellows responded that is possible but she would still be
looking for some type of extension above the roof line. He stated
that this would be getting into the engineering issues that Mr. Jillson
or people with his qualifications are much better able to answer, but
that it is his general understanding that it probably would not be as
sturdy on the roof as it would be if it were mounted and �
appropriately engineered.
Mayor Mertensotto asked if there aze antennas available that could
be mounted on the roof and that would serve Ms. Pentel's needs.
Mr. Bellows stated he is talking about two different things - which is
the support structure of the antenna to get it to a certain elevation,
and the antenna on top of that, which is the device which actually
sends out and receives the radio signals. He states that it is a two
part questions, the structural integrity of a roof-mounted tower, the
height to which that roof mounted tower would reach. He stated that
from what he laiows of the market there are substantially fewer roof
mounted towers and they don't appeaz to be as sturdy as the ground
mounted structures.
Mayor Mertensotto asked what maximum height Ms. Pentel could
get by with given the expression of her intent of what she wants to
do.
Mr. Bellows responded that he believes that a reasonable
accommodation height, is the 68 foot height that has been requested
- approximately one wave length at 20 meters. He stated that this is
significant in that it effects the ability of the signal to be sent in a
way that it would permit radio signals, to pernut her communication
at those frequencies with some reliability internationally as well as
nationally. ��
Mayor Mertensotto asked if Ms. Pentel is primarily interested in
sending rather than receiving. He also asked what would happen if
Ms. Pentel were to sell her property. He stated that at the last
meeting Mr. Bellows stated that the operator must have a license to
operate it but that doesn't necessarily mean that the tower has to
come down if a new owner is not licensed.
Responding to the first question, Mr. Bellows stated that Ms. Pentel
is interested in two party communication. With respect to the
second question, he sta.ted that what he intended to say was that the
rational for the exception to the zoning ordinance that permits the
existence of a tower is the fact that Ms. Pentel has an amateur radio
license and that without her possession of that amateur radio license
Page No. 4169
October 4, 199�
; Council wouldn't be dealing with PRB-I. He stat
' � federal regulation that preempts the local zoning c
� would require some compromise with respect to t
� an amateur tower and antenna above the 20 foot h
' He sta.ted that if she were to sell the premises and
; not have a license were to buy the premises, there
for them to have a tower. Even if they had a vazi�
could be conditioned upon the owner holding a v�
� license.
;
Mayor Mertensotto asked what if the city could reqi
tower be removed if the new owner does not have a
that PRB-I is a
inance and
installation of
;ht limitation.
meone who did
�uld be no basis
e the variance
l amateur radio
that the
Mr. Bellows stated that he assumes Ms. Pentel woul'd take the tower
with her since the tower atta.ched to a founda.tion that can be
removed. He further stated that generally when ham radio operators
move from place to place they take the towers with them, since there
would be no reason for a subsequent buyer to have any use for them.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that another question whi�
asked by the neighbors and other people throughout
who are concerned about this issue the liability for �
He stated that he does not deal with properiy insuraa
but some of the neighbors have told him that if som�
happen to the tower they could not collect from Ms.
because genera.11y it would be an Act of God. The t�
down in a wind storm as an example. He asked hov�
the people next door that they are protected because
require her to carry insurance.
Mr. Bellows responded that the answer it two-fold.
fail to maintain the tower in the proper fashion and 1
negligence on her part that resulted in injuiy to her i
as he understands her liability insurance, her insurar
it. Two, in terms of the casualty loss, presumably it
if a tree were blown during a wind storm and damag
the tower were blown down and there was no neglig
casua.lty coverage of the homeowner would cover it
cover damage done by a tree falling.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that what Mr. Bellow.
saying is that there would be no insurance coverage i
came down unless negligence could be proven on the
Pentel, and while the city could require her to cazry n
neighbors couldn't collect.
�
h has been
he community
�operty damage.
;e to any extent,
:hing were to
'entel's insurer
wer could come
Council can tell
:ouncil can
ie, should she
re was any
;hbors, then,
would cover
�uld be just as
property. If
�e, the
it would
is apparently
'the tower
part of Ms.
surance the
Page No. 4170
October 4, 1994
Mr. Bellows responded that he cannot answer whether her casualty
coverage would provide compensation for them but just as if a tree
came down a neighbor's property during a wind storm, that would
be a casualty loss covered by their casualty insurance. The same
would seemingly apply to the tower if that came down during a wind
storm and there was no negligence. Unless there was negligence,
there would be no liability on Ms. Pentel's part.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the Mr. Bellows is saying is that the
neighbor's own insurance has to protect them. He stated that the
�_• neighbors aze concerned and have told him that they have checked
� with their insurers and have been told Ms. Pentel is not responsible
unless they can prove negligence.
Mayor Mertensotto asked if Ms. Pentel would be willing to look into
what is available for mounting an antenna on her house. He stated
that residents who spoke to him today say that if the city is forced to
approve a tower they would rather that an antenna be mounted on
her home rather than free-standing.
Mr. Bellows responded that he would ask Ms. Pentel to look into it
but that he is not awaze of any roof mounted tower that would reach
the 68 foot height. He stated that he is also concerned about the
structural integrity but that he would be willing to explore it.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the sttuctural engineering expert who
was retained on the city's behalf, Geoffrey Jillson, gave Council his
findings and recommendations at the September 6 meeting. At the
September 6 discussion, Council asked Mr. Nystrom to address five
questions relating to the recommendations.
Mr. Bellows stated that he understands that Mr. Jillson's report
specifies an EIA standard dated March, 91 'which provides an 80
mph wind load capability and also that the report recommends that
the EIA standards with respect to radial ice.
Mr. Jillson sta.ted that the EIA standards; Appendix H addresses ice
and ice accuxnulations on towers. The Appendix H commentary
speaks to how to go about analyzing for ice accumulations on
towers. He explained that the information is rather comprehensive,
describes various types of icing and recommends to the designer of
towers or installations that they obtain specific site related
information from authorities on the subject including the U.S.
government. National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, to
make determinations on what type of ice loading should be applied
to each specific installation. He stated that selecting of the criteria
Page No. 41 �11
October 4, 1994
of using 1/2 inch radial ice is an exemplaz, and is a commonly used
number but the EIA/TIA standard does specify that it should be
researched by the designer for each local applicatiori.
Mayor Mertensotto asked if Mr. Jillson recommends that if Council
were to adopt a standard that Council would impose Cthe ice •
accumulation factor as far as the antenna is concerned.
Mr. Jillson responded yes, the standard states that each different type
} of structure based on height, location and type of coristruction needs
. to be evaluated specific to the type of structure, tall and very a11
structures are subject to different types of accumulat�ons than shorter
towers.
Mayor Mertensotto asked if the EIA standards in 1991 are current.
� Mr. Jillson responded that the standard may have been superseded,
but that the ice accumulation aspect of it does not ap�ear to have
changed very significantly. The standard does not ch�ange
dramatically form edition to edition.
Mayor Mertensotto asked Mr. Jillson to check the latest revision of
the standard and give Council a written report to verify that there has
not been any significant change in that standard. I
Mr. Bellows stated that he is fine with the standard a
; recommend it to Ms. Pentel as a reasonable compror
the radial ice, he asked that to the extent that the Co�
imposing an 80 mph wind capability and a radial ice
this tower that it not be any different or any more on
imposed on any other structure or tower within the c
� reasonable past or in the future. To the e�tent that C
' a more stringent standard on this type of ari installati
� to other towers or structures then there may be a que
whether or not it is reasonable or unreasonable.
' Mayor Mertensotto stated that the most recent structu
� recall are the four light standards requested by St. Thc
for its stadium and it was his recollection that Counci:
i design and mechanical engineers who were advising t
' in regard to the light standards, to determine that they
to an 80 mph wind.
Mr. B ows s ted that all he is asking is that to the e
' Coun ,1�(' poses standards to this installation it sh
. those tan to any other standard installation. He
would
e. Regarding
il considers
�uirement on
us than is
munity in the
icil imposes
as opposed
►ns as to
�s he can
nas Academy
directed the
�e architects,
Nere designed
that
apply
3 he does -
Page No. 4172
October 4, 1994
not quarrel with it but to the extent that a more onerous set of
standards is being applied here, Council would not be following
what appears to be the precepts that were set forth both in case law
and the circuit court decision.
Mayor Mertensotto asked Dr. Dubois if Mr. Bellow's comments that
Ms. Pentel needs a tower at least 68 feet in height in order to
accomplish whatever band she is operating for receiving and sending
correlate with the research Dr. Dubois did for the city.
Dr. Dubois stated that he is a registered professional engineer, a°� �
communications engineer, and has done over 200 communication
systems both in Mendota. Heights and throughout the county and his
30 years, expertise in is in the area of communication systems. He
stated that this is primarily not a communications problem. It is
most certainly a structural engineering problem which is not his
expertise but rather Mr. Jillson's. The other part is the fact that this
has progressed beyond Council to the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals
and the result is that they directed Council to compromise with Ms.
Pentel to come up with a reasonable accommodation. He stated that
the documentation he provided Council with since the last meeting
shows that the optimum antenna for Ms. Pentel's dual role of long
range communications (D� and local communication is about a
wave length at the lowest frequency of interest that Ms. Pentel has is
about 20 meters, which means about 66 feet. If Council considers
that to be the optimum height for the lowest frequency, as Ms.
Pentel goes up in frequency she needs a shorter and shorter tower.
In his original report he defined, from Webster Dictionary, what
compromise means (something less than optimum). If the optimum
frequency requires a 66 foot beam antenna, in his recommendation
perhaps 50 foot would be an optimum compromise. Today Council
raises something else, asking about mour�ing on top of the roof. He
stated there is a 55 foot antenna on top of tlie roof and it would seem
that if you could achieve a 55 foot antenna vertical radiator type
antenna it is conceivable, that a beam antenna could be put on top of
the structure, providing there is structural strength to do it. He stated
that if Council agrees with his philosophy that 50 feet is a
compromise as the courts have directed, there is a potential solution.
He stated that his recommendation is, that 50 feet will be a
compromise at the shortest frequency, the longest wavelength she
would use, and at the other frequencies, the 50 foot would be
optimum.
Mayor Mertensotto asked if what Dr. Dubois is saying is that for the
most of the band widths that Ms. Pentel would be using she could
get by with a 50 foot antenna.
Page No. 41
October 4, 1!
Dr. Dubois responded that it would be optimum at many of the
frequencies and at the worst case scenarios it would'be usable at the
other frequencies. �
Mayor Mertensotto asked is if under most condition's an antenna at a
50 foot height would probably serve. I
Dr. Dubois responded that it is a compromise at her lowest
frequency of operation and at her highest frequency it is optimum.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that Mr. Bellows laid two
structures are actually being discussed, a tower which is a supporting
structure and the antenna. She asked if it is clearly understood
wit.hin engineering circles that these are two different shuctures.
De Dubois responded that it is.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that 1
that Council is required to make a reasd
antenna, but there is no reference to the
Dr. Dubois stated that they aze one in the same in t
accommodation in the antenna means the accomm�
height. Ms. Pentel has already selected an antenna
nature of the antenna, there is an optimum, and the
one wave length for the combined utilization she w
the tower does in this case is hold up the antenna.
Dr. Dubois stated that in his 30 yeazs of experience u
aesthetics have no interest in the part of the Federal C
courts and are not even in the City Couna�l domain, �
Council has total control is safety. He believes not o�
by granting this variance taking legal responsibility fi
unsafe structure but if a safe structure is put in Dr. Di
residents would be a little more willing to put up witY
follow the EIA rules and I urge you to do that. He st�
Jillson has recommended that Council must require a
would be taking legal responsibility if it grants a vari;
unsafe tower. He urged Council to follow the EIA ru
if safety is required the neighbors may be more willin
with it.
Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and
audience.
�
the case is
�dation to the
case - the
tion of antenna
�e and the
!:imum is about
s to make. All
the field,
�vernment or
it where
ly is the city
r putting in an
�ois thinks the
it - if we
:ed that as Mr.
�afe tower, and
nce for an
�s and felt that
; to put up
for the
Page No. 4174
October 4, 1994
Mr. Jim Plummer, asked if a 40 to 50 foot tower would work to get
all the signals, and if a 40-50 foot safe tower can be designed on top
of the house.
Mr. Jillson stated that it is possible, but the choice of it being
available is small although it can be designed and built.
Mr. Plummer asked as a compromise if Ms. Pentel would be willing
to pay to have such a design - to get her signals out and be sure that
is safe rather than have the city try to design a tower.
1 �j
Mayor Mertensotto sta.ted that the city would n be designing the
tower. It is still the applicant's and the design no Council's
concem. Council is chazged with responsibility for not only the
safety of Ms. Pentel but also the neighbors in the area - to make sure
from all the evidence that is available that it is a safe tower.
Mr. Bellows stated that it is unlikely such a raof-mounted tower is
available. He thought to the question of whether she would be
willing to have such a tower designed and pay for the design, when
there are commercially available ground mounted towers that can be
deternuned to qualify and meet the standards that Mr. Jillson has
specified as being the appropriate standards, is no. If there aze
commercially available towers that will meet those standards there
would seem to be no reason to go to the extraordinary expense of
constructing a single tower and having a11 of that expense plus all
the expense of having an engineering on that tower when there are
conunercially available towers with engineering studies available
and acceptable to Ms. Pentel. Also, he felt it is a false assumption
on De. Dubois' part that one wave length, 66 feet as 20 meters,
would be the optimum height for an antenna. He stated he is
unaware of any support for the position and unaware of any support
in the ARRL Handbook he uses as a basis �for that premise. He
directed Council's attention to the paper "Antenna Height"and
Communications Effectiveness" which was in the packet, and in
1991 was utilized as an exhibit in both the District Court and
Appellate Court record. He stated the first page executive summary
speaks about communication effectiveness of a 35 foot and 70 foot
antennas and the difference between antennas - An antenna at 35 feet
is unsatisfactory while the same at 70 is quite satisfactory. The 70
foot height is used purely for compazison, however, and should not
be construed as the optimum height. Heights above 100 feet would
give significantly better performance than one at 70. He stated his
only purpose for reading this is to challenge Dr. Dubois that 66 feet
is the optimum. He stated he has seen no support for it in Dr.
Page No. 4175
October 4, 199�
Dubois' report or in his reference to the ARRL Handbook. He
sta.ted that 68 feet is not the optimum heights, it is � compromise.
Mr. Plummer sta.ted that then the Council is back to the ta.11 tower
again, which Mr. Jillson said is unsafe. The tower is appazently the
only thing Ms. Pentel will go along with, there should not be any
question. If council then approves it they are approving an unsafe
tower and the city accepts the responsibility for daiages when the
tower falls down.
� �� Mayor Mertensotto stated that Mr. Bellows said they will: meet all of
� the requirements of the EIA standards and would also undergo the
' ice accumulation analysis to determine that the square footage under
- the ice loading would not be a hazard. He asked if lYls. Pentel would
A meet all the requirements Mr. Jillson has recomxnended.
Mr. Bellows responded that they will meet them as
will also enforce those requirements for other struc
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he does not think
apply to such structures as a water tower.
Mr. Jillson stated that the issue he is talking about in
shuctures relates to the very unique type of structure
very higb. performance structures, which means they
stressed small, high performance where a lot of heig
out of very few building components. As the result �
with other structures like big Neagele signs or water
� buildings or houses, one: they accumulate ice becau
metal and they have a tendency to accumulate ice, b�
' effect of that amount of ice on them has a dramatic a
strength of the tower which can be cut in��ialf very q�
. stated that there may be a couple of perceritage point
the affect of the same amount of ice on some of thos�
� structures, which is why iYs not even addressed in tl�
typically.
Councilmember Krebsbach asked if the antenna
adjacent property when fully extended.
Mr. Bellows stated that this issue�was raised Se�
, would have no problem with either getting a diffe
would not overlap or moving the tower to a point
' overlap the property. He further stated that if the
, to 8 feet towards the center of the lot the antenna
within the property lines.
as Council
they would
these types of
�. These are
are highlY
it can be gotten
�f that compared
�owers or
�e they aze
t secondly, the
�ect on the
uckly. He
� difference in
; larger
�UBC
on the
ber 6 and he
antenna that
;re it would not
er is moved 6
.ld be well
Page No. 4176
October 4, 1994
Councilmember Krebsbach asked if the neighbors would be
precluded from erecting their own antennas, and if her transmission
would be interrupted.
Mr. Bellows sta.ted that this is not an issue this Council can deal
with, it is under the jurisdiction of the FCC, but there could be some
interference with reception if all the neighbors had them and were
operating them at the same time. He stated that Ms. Pentel's tower
does not impinge on their rights to be a ham radio opera.tor.
Mayor Mertensotto asked Attorney Nystrom, if the citizens who live
in the area of the applicants address have a right to vote on this
issue.
Mr. Nystrom stated that residents should not be disappointed with
Council. The Federal Government has made a decision to step into
this area and take away the power of cities and counties to regulate
this issue. He suggested that people should talk to their
congressmen. He stated that the ultimate concem the Council has,
and responsibility it has to the citizens, is the safety issue. Council
has retained Mr. Jillson and is relying on his expertise to guide in
that area letting Council know what the standards are that have been
developed in terms of engineering. When Council gets into issues
with respect to particular placement, rooftop versus ground level, its
discretion is somewhat limited. Ms. Pentel certainly cannot impinge
on her neighbor's property. Council has an obligation to look at the
safety aspect and rely on Mr. Jillson's analysis of the tower that is
being proposed. It was his opinion that quite clearly the Council is
not required under PRB-1 to comprise the safety issue - this is well
defined in the standards and Council is well within its rights to
protect Ms. Pentel and her neighbors. ��
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the questions to him by the neighbor
was why Council does not give the residents the opportunity to vote
on the issue, he tells them that his not a referendum issue where they
would have an opportunity to vote on a ballot, but must be a Council
decision. He stated that certa.inly the residents should give their
input to Councilmembers as their representatives on the Council but
the decision must be made by the Council.
Mr. Nystrom responded that what everyone must understand is that
the Federal Government has taken a lot of Council's discretion away
and said that outside of very specific instances, such as safety, the
considerations are going to be overridden by a federal policy.
Page No. 4:
October 4, 1
Mayor Mertensotto asked Mr. Bellows if he would be willing to
investigate whether the applicant would consicler a structure to be
mounted on her home rather than free-standing. I
Mr. Bellows sta.ted that he will but does not want there to be a
misunderstanding as he thinks the probability of finding something
commercially available that would meet the requirements Mr. Jillson
says are appropriate is very low. �
Mayor Mertensotto stated that it becomes a questior.
relativeness of cost. He stated that there are many r�
vehemently opposed to think it is beyond reason for
put this type of tower on a 60 foot lot, and what he i�
getting into the merits of that assertion and asking if
where compromise can be found.
Mr. Bellows asked why there is a belief that a ro�
would be more palatable than a ground-mounted
� Ms. Sazah Postiglione, 562 Fremont Avenue, respon
were to be mounted on the roof and she was sitting i
back yazd she would not be able to see the tower as �
would be blocked by the trees in Ms. Pentel's back 3
trees would have to be removed if she had the tower
, ground and it would be in plain sight.
of the
�idents who are
he applicant to
looking for is
his is an area
tower
�d that if it
her park like
�ll because it
rd. Those
ut on the
Mrs. Patricia Kasheimer, neighbor to Mrs. Postiglione, stated that a
, child is not as apt to try to clunb a tower if it is put on the roof as
, they would but if it were in the back yard, it would be appealing to
kids and is part of the safety issue. �
.
�
;
;
Mrs. Liz Plummer stated that when this started in 19
.
has two antennas on her home, one 45 feef one 56 fe
put up without a variance. Then she asked to have a
now its 72 feet. She stated that compromise, means
way. She sta.ted the neighbors have suggested that s]
antenna/tower on top of the roof which will be past t
wants and if it collapses in the wind or the sleet, it w
roof and not on little children in the neighborhood. ;
Pentel should beaz any damage since, if it fell on son
yard she would not be responsible.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he can see that there is
suggestion since it wouldn't be at eye level if it were
of the structure and from a safety standpoint.
Ms. Pentel
and they were
� foot one and
�eting half
put her
65 feet she
1d fall on her
e felt that Ms.
�ne else's
merit in the
nount on top
Page No. 4178
October 4, 1994
Councilmember Huber cited Dr. Dubois in his October 121etter
were he refutes comments of Mr. Bellows. He stated that on the
second page Dr. Dubois talks about figure 32b on page 15-17, and
they talk about 15% lobes vs. 30% lobes which goes to Dr. Dubois
assertion that the 66 feet is optimum which is contrary to what Mr.
Bellows says. •
Dr. Dubois stated that Council hired him because he has a Ph.D. in
electrical engineering, with many years of experience, and Council
is seeking his opinion versus the opinion of Mr. Bellows, an attomey
��-- who also happens to be a ham opera.tor. He sta.ted that if one were to
take the two curves 32 a and b and run a computer study one would
find that the lower part of the antenna is the 15 degree lobe. This is
the lobe that does the DX because the lower you take off into the
horizon the farther you aze going to go because you reflect off the
ionosphere and go to an adjacent continent. The worst case is where
at 45 degrees you would simply go up and come done in Florida., but
if you take the 30 degree lobe you have the best of both worlds. He
stated that this is why he says it is optimum, because you are getting
the 45 degree lobe to get into Florida and at the same time, 15
degree lobe to get to Romania, and everything in between. He stated
that the lugh angle radiation exists for short skip but Ms. Pentel
wants DX so then she wants to use the lower skip, roughly 50
degrees, and the higher antenna is a little bit more favorable for DX
direct long distance.
Councilmember Huber asked Dr. Dubois if he is azguing that the 66
foot is in fact optimal.
Dr. Dubois responded yes, for her lowest frequency, which is the
worst case, the optimum is 66 feet. Optimum is one wave leng�th,
which at 20 meters happens to be 66 feet \but if she went to a 50 foot
height, which is a compromise, the curvesblend so there is a little
bit of DX and a little bit of shorter range.
Councilmember Huber asked if she would have international
capability at 50 feet.
Dr. Dubois responded that on certain bands it would be optimum for
long distance, at certain frequencies, not at 20 meters, but it would
be suitable.
Councilmember Huber asked Mr. Bellows if he is saying he does not
have the material Dr. Dubois has referred to.
Page No. 41
October 4, 1!
Mr. Bellows responded that what he is saying is tha� the terms
� optimum and favorable aze not synonymous and tha� the document
, Dr. Dubois is relying on does not ever suggest that this is the
optimum frequency. I
Dr. Dubois sta.ted that for all the various applications Ms. Pentel has
' indicated, short range to take care of her emergency medical care
and DX, the 50 foot height is a compromise.
' Councilmember Huber stated that leaving the words optimum and
favorable out of it, Dr. Dubois is suggesting that at t1� e 50 foot
� height, Ms. Pentel has international capability. He as�Ced Mr.
Bellows if he contends that this is false. �
Mr. Bellows responded that Ms. Pentel has the capab
► intemational communication but not on a reasonably
i
'; which is what the cases are suggesting is the standarc
' that she has the right to reasonably reliable communi
, feet will going to provide reasonably reliable commu
further stated that above 66 feet the angle of radiatioY
i and with the higher antenna, the lobe will be substanl
stated that the process was described specifically in a
presented to Council. An additional factor is that the
' off the ionosphere 80 miles up and sun spots radicall;
, solid the ionized layer is. On an eleven year basis, as
increase and decrease, the level of ionization changes
� affects what is called the maximum usable frequency
much of what Dr. Dubois has talked about is frequen�
usable on an international basis half of the time or m<
ility for
frequent basis,
. He stated
:ations and 50
ucations. He
will go down
ially lower. He
document he
signal bounces
� affect how
sun spots
and that
He stated that
;ies that are not
Dr. Dubois responded that everything Mr. Bellows has said is true
but extremely misleading. He stated that��he norm is not what is
' being discussed. I
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Mr. Bellows has statec
� make a determination on the cost difference and avai]
i antenna mounted on the house versus a free-standing
whether it is reasonable to ask the applicant to go roo
' compromise for the residents who are objecting to it.
• stated that Mr. Bellows has indicated that he would d
give a response to Council. At the same time, Counc.
' experts, primarily Mr. Jillson, to provide information
available and the appazent cost factor, so information
both sides.
he would
�bility of an
>tructure, and
' mounted as a
He further
► reseazch and
l will ask its
�n what is
is presented by
Page No. 4180
October 4, 1994
Mr. Jillson stated that there has been discussion from the residents
about where the tower would land if it fell. He stated that given the
size of the lot and height of the tower, it could fall half way across
an adjacent lot. He further stated that if a total height antenna of 50
feet, for example, were centrally mounted on the roof, which is
about 20 feet above ground, it would land entirely on the Pentel lot.
Mr. Ted Tholey asked Council to consider that if the present
standards are loosened and a permit is granted for a 68 foot tower,
Council would not be able to refuse a permit for other similar towers
and they would be scattered throughout the city. �-
Mayor Mertensotto responded tha.t Council could not treat any
applicant differently but that he would guess there would not be a
proliferation of towers. He stated that over the yeazs other residents
have asked hi.m if they could have ham radio antennas in their back
yazds and lus first response was to suggest that they check with their
neighbors. The requests were subsequently withdrawn. He did not
think there would be many Mendota Heights residents who would
think about installing a tower if there were objections from
neighbors.
Mrs. Plummer stated that over 50 residents have given written
objection to the antenna and tower.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that he is aware of the objections and
lrnows that the residents are wondering why Council does not deny
the request, but Council cannot do so because the court of appeals
has said that Council must try to arrive at a compromise. He stated
that if Council azbitrarily denied the variance it would not be
fulfilling the court mandate.
,�
Mrs. Plumnier asked if the city cannot tell the court that the
tower/antenna is dangerous.
Mr. Nystrom responded that the safety concerns were expressed to
both trial court and the court of appeals when the matter was
litigated. The trial court agreed with the city, but the court of
appeals has disagreed with the way in which the issue was treated in
the manner of the record that was before the court at the time. Those
concerns have been raised, and the issue of Ms. Pentel's current wlup
antenna as something of a compromise has akeady been litigated
and the court has disapproved that as a compromise. He stated that
he cannot emphasize enough that the Council has some well defined
obligations under the Eighth Circuit Court order - they have to
consider the application and must make certain factual findings
Page No. 4181
October 4, 199�
, based on recommendations and evidence as placed t
, obligated under the court order to enter into negotial
compromise solution. He stated that if the city does
� obligations it can be exposed to some type of conten
j other type of sanction. The court has made it clear a
; city's obligations are and, in Mr. Nystrom's opinion,
° deals with the request in the manner the court has su
� aze some risks.
� Mayor Mertensotto asked Mr. Bellows how much
need to prepare his response.
RECESS
CASE NO. 94'-24, KERN
Mr. Bellows responded that he should have an
October 18 meeting and would be present if C�
will be made at that meeting.
fore it and is
►ns to attempt a
ot fulfill its
>t citation or
to what the
nless the city
�ested there
he would
:r by the
feels a decision
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Council would not want to make a
decision unless Mr. Bellows is present. He asked Nir. Bellows and
Mr. Jillson to prepare their information and submit it by October 18
and stated that Council will set November 1 as the i get date for a
decision to be made.
Mayor Mertensotto called a recess at 10:00 p.m.
reconvened at 10:11 p.m.
Council aclrnowledged an application from Mr. Ker
wetlands permit and front yard setback variance to �
construction of a single family home at 531 Marie �
from the wetlands and 40 feet from the front properl
also acknowledged an associated staff inemo and le1
from neighboring property owners.
.-.
Mr. Kern, present for the discussion, acknowledged
withdrawn his original request for a variance for an
structure and stated that he will not do any filling in
He also stated that he agrees to the conditions recon
Planning Commission, has corrected his site plan to
will be no wetland filling, and will install a silt fenc�
boundary lines aze shown on the site plan.
Councilmember Krebsbach noted Planning Comrni
comments that the lot existed prior to current zonin
would not have been platted under current wetland
; meeting was
y Kern for
low
✓enue, 23 feet
► IlIle. COLU1C11
ers of consent
hat he has
ccessory
he wetlands.
nended by the
�how that there
where the
ioner Friel's
regulations and
Page No. 4182
October 4, 1994
Councilmember Krebsbach moved to approve a ten foot front yard
setback variance in the R-lA district and a wetlands permit to allow
construction of a single family home at 531 Marie Avenue to within
twenty three feet of the wetlands, as proposed on revised plans dated
September 27, 1994, with the condition that a silt fence be required
for erosion control and with the understanding that under no �
circumstances will any filling be allowed in the wetland area.
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
CASE NO. 94-22, LENTSC�i Gouncil acknowledged an application from Mr. William Lentsch
(OLSOI� for Mr. David Olson for a wetlands permit to allow construction of a
single family home 51 feet from the wetlands at Lot 6, Block 1,
Mendota Woods. Council also acknowledged associated stafF
reports and letters of consent from neighboring property owners.
Mayor Mertensotto asked Mr. Olson if his site plan shows a future
deck and if it shows which trees will be removed. He also asked if a
grading plan has been submitted.
Mr. Olson responded that he has submitted a drainage plan and that
the site plan shows a future deck and which trees, several dead trees
and approlciinately 9 or lO live oaks, wluch will have to be removed.
He informed Council that, after meeting with Public Works Director
Danielson, the plan was revised to save as many trees as possible.
Responding to a question about a five foot snow storage easement
which had been requested by Mr. Lentsch for Lot 7, Mr. Olson
sta.ted that he has said no to the request because he is fearful of
potential damage to live oaks on the property line.
Public Works Director Danielson sta.ted that Mr. Lentsch has moved
his driveway so he does not need the ease�nent for snow storage. He
explained that everyone is concerned about saving oak trees and the
Olson plan has been revised to minimize the loss.
Responding to a question, Mr. Olson �stated that there will be a
retaining wall on the side of the house, a retaining wall to save an
eighteen inch oak, and one on the Lot 5 side for drainage purposes.
Councilmember Huber moved to approve a wetlands permit for Lot
6, Block 1, Mendota. Woods, to allow construction of a single family
home to within 51 feet of the wetlands, as proposed on the revised
grading/site plan dated September 14, 1994.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
�
f
Page No. 4:
October 4, 1
� Nays:O
CASE NO. 94-29, Council acknowledged an application from Mr. (
BANGASSER for a two foot sideyard setback variance to allow
third garage stall addition to his home at 2223 Cc
Council also acknowledged a letter from Mr. Baa
' his request, associated staff reports and letters of
neighboring property owners.
Mr. Bangasser explained that the variance is only fc
of his lot. He explained that he moved the garage a
back as it can go and still retain a good appeazance.
the proposed addition will be identical to the home
and that the addition is necessary to keep his third v
street and driveway.
After brief discussion, Councilmember Krebsbach
a two foot side yazd setback variance to allow con.
gazage addition as proposed, eight feet from the pr
closest point.
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
Bangasser
iction of a
;ld Drive.
explaining
t from �
- a small triangle
.dition as far
He sta.ted that
� a11 materials
;hicle off the
i to approve
�n of the
line at its
CASE NO. 94-27, MARCHIO Council acknowledged an application from Mr. Ant�iony Marchio
; for a variance to allow a four foot wood fence on his�through lot at
2477 Stockbridge Road, in his front yard along Mendota. Heights
Road. Council also acknowledged associated staff reports and
� letters of consent from neighboring property owners.�
Mr. Marchio informed Council that the setback rec
city engineering, eight feet from the trail, is accept�
stated that the Planning Commission had recomme
install landscape screening along Mendota. Heights
asked how much landscaping is needed. '�,
Mayor Mertensotto responded that Council will not
amount on the landscaping nor will it require a cert�
rather will ask Mr. Marchio to, in good faith, do lan
he feels looks good. He pointed out that the fence �
precedent along Mendota. Heights Road and asked �
boazd spacing Mr. Marchio is considering.
Mr. Marchio responded that he will space the boazds
possible since he has small children. He aclaiowledg
Planning Commission would like the fence to be as o
and informed Council that he will not install a solid t
rather is considering a picket fence.
nended by
to him. He
i that he
�d fence and
�ce a dollar
spacing, but
saping which
be setting a
.t kind of
close as
that the
a as possible
rd fence but
Page No. 4184
October 4, 1994
Councilmember Krebsbach moved to grant a fence height variance
to allow a four foot wood fence, as proposed, at a setback of eight
feet from the trail, with appropriate landscape screening along
Mendota Heights Road.
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion. •
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
CASE NO. 94-28, MICKENS Council aclaiowledged an application from Mr. David Mickens for a
variance from the established front yard setback to allow
construction of a garage, three season porch, deck, front entry and
� dining room addition to his elcisting home 38 feet from the front
property line at 1875 South Lexington. Council also acknowledged
associated staff reports and letters of consent from the neighboring
property owners.
After brief discussion, Councilmember Huber moved to approve a
front yazd setback variance to allow construction of a proposed
garage addition 38 feet from the front properiy line at 1875 South
Lexington Avenue as proposed.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
CASE NO. 94-30, FISCHER Council aclaiowledged an application from Mr. & Mrs. James
Fischer for a wetlands permit to allow construction of a single
family home 58 feet from the wetlands at 1830 Rolling Green
Curve. Council also acknowledged associated staff reports and
letters of consent from adjoining property owners.
Mr. Fischer stated that the house he proposed lines up with the
neighbors on both sides, four to five feet behind one of the houses
and three to four feet in front of the other. He explained that the lot
is on a curve. Responding to a question, �e stated that this is the last
lot in the Rolling Green Addition and he is not going to change the
grades of the lot.
Public Works Director Danielson stated that Mr. Fischer has agreed
to install silt fencing during conshuction. He informed Council that
the Planning Commission was concerned that the fence be located
uphill of the storm water inlet.
Mayor Mertensotto asked the proposed basement elevation. Mr.
Fischer stated that there is a deed restriction requiring the elevation
to be two feet above the high water mark of the pond. He explained
that this is the same elevation as the neighboring homes and any
higher would place the house above the street.
Ayes: 3
Nays:O '
Abstain: 1 Smith
CASE NO. 94-26, CROMBIE
Page No. 4:
October 4, 1
Councilmember Smith arrived at 10:35 p.m.
Councilmember Krebsbach moved to approve a we�
allow construction of a single family home to withi�
of the wetlands, as proposed, with the condition tha
located uphill of the inlet and closer to the drainage
easement line.
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
Council aclaiowledged an application from Mr. Bria
lot split at 1575 Wachtler Avenue. Council also ack
associated staff reports, signatures of consent from r.
property owners, and a letter from Mr. & Mrs. Mike
expressing concern over development of the propert;
Folz, land surveyor for the Crombies was present fo�
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the major concern is
Commission recommended the lot split with the co;
city acquire a drainage and utility easement on the ]
where the storm water outlot has been extended fro:
location.
Mr. Folz stated that the easement is on the Evenson I
feet west of the west property line. He stated that the
extended the pipe 80 feet, apparently with city pernu;
filled and landscaped over the pipe. The entrance to �
drains four or five lots, is now about 70 to 80 feet be�
easement which had been granted to the city. He sug
city require the easement and sta.ted that if the owner
the only other option would be for the cif�.to remove
relocate it to its original location.
ands pernut to
fifly eight feet
the silt fenee be
uid utility
Crombie for a
. Mr. Bruce
the discussion.
at the Planning
ition that the
enson property
its original
ot, about 20
Evensons
sion, and has
he pipe which
ond the
;ested that the
ioes not agree,
the pipe and
Public Works Director Danielson informed Council t�at he has
spoken to Mr. Evenson and feels that Mr. Evenson will agree to
grant the easement. �
Mayor Mertensotto sta.ted that the city currently does
an easement to unplug the drainage line if needed. H
staff will need to communicate promptly to the prope
the easement is needed and if it is not granted Counci
order that the pipe be removed. He informed Mr. Fol
conixibution will also be required from the applicants
�
iot even have
stated that
.y owners that
will have to
that a park
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Page No. 4186
October 4, 1994
Mr. Folz informed Council that because of the requirement that a
fifly foot roadway easement be dedicated along Wachtler Avenue
(17 feet is needed in addition to the e�cisting 33 foot easement) a
five foot front yard setback is also needed for the existing home.
Public Works Director Danielson informed Council that the property
is currently unplatted and the plat for the division will show the
easements.
Mr. Folz responded that he does not propose subdivision platting but
rather a simple lot split with metes and bounds descriptions of the
two lots. He stated that the utility and drainage easements will be
shown on the deeds. He further stated that the certificate of survey
has been revised to show utility and drainage easements and the
Wachtler right-of-way.
Mayor Mertensotto informed Mr. Folz tha.t city staff will not certify
documentation on city approval of the lot split until city engineering
has received and reviewed the survey, easements and deeds.
Councilmember Krebsbach asked if the house construction on the
newly created lot will meet the Park Place covenants. Mr. Folz
responded that the house will be consistent with those in Park Place.
After discussion, Councilmember Huber moved to approve the
division of 1575 Wachtler Avenue as proposed along with a five
foot front yazd setback variance for the existing home on Pazcel A,
with the conditions that drainage and utility easements be provided,
that a fifly foot roadway easement be provided along Wachtler
Avenue, that the property owner submit the required $750 park
contribution, and that a storm sewer easement be obtained for the
storm water outlet on the adjacent proper.�, and that all existing
accessory out-buildings be removed, all subject to engineering staff
review of the certificate of survey to determine that everything is in
compliance.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Mayor Mertensotto recommended that staff contact the adjacent land
owner to advise him of Council's concern that the city acquire an
easement to provide access for maintenance of the drainage pipe.
He stated that if the easement is not granted by November 15, the
public works staff will be directed to remove the pipe.
Councilmember Huber moved to direct the engineering staff to
notify the land oumer accordingly.
0
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
CASE NO. 94-17, LENTSCH
i
Page No. 4187
October 4, 1994
Cou.ncilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Council acknowledged a memo from the Public W�
relative to access issues related to William Lentsch
rezoning for Outlot B of the Mendota. Woods Addi�
also acknowledged a letter from the Kensington M�
Condominium Association informing Council on t]
decision not to grant an access easement onto Broo
Outlot B.
Mayor Mertensotto asked Public Works Director `
cost of condemning easement rights to Brookfield
ks Director
application for
�n. Council
or Homes
Association's
ield Lane for
the potential
� would be.
Mr. Danielson responded that the city already owns utility and
drainage easements and appraiser Blake Davis has informed him that
he feels acquisition would be about one-third of the cost of normal
street right-of-way. I
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he feels the owner of �� utlot B should
be an Association member so that he contributes in tlie Association's
cost of maintaining the road - condemning the right-of-way will
make Brookfield a public street. (
Mr. Lentsch informed Council that he had offered to
watermain and a proportionate share of the road ma'v
stated that he would be willing to pay the cost of obx
easement and that he is empowered to speak for Irvu
owner of the outlot.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Council can authorize
with the cost of acquisition to be negotiated between
property owner. He felt that it is appropnate to auth<
condemnation rather than imposing a joint driveway
and also that action on the rezoning request should b�
the Association submits its reaction to potential coni
proceedings.
Councilmember Smith moved to authorize retaining
perform an appraisal, to direct staff to prepare an ap�
resolution for adoption on October 18 to officially a
quick take proceeding relative to acquisition of a pul
easement on Brookfield Lane for the purpose of gair
Outlot B of Mendota. Woods and to direct staff to no
Kensington Manor Home Association of Council's a
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
for
nance. He
�ing an
Clazk, the
city and the
� serve the lot,
withheld until
:e Davis to
ience a
y dedicated
access to
the
Ayes: 3
Nays: 1 Krebsbach
Page No. 4188
October 4, 1994
Mayor Mertensotto sta.ted that it is vital that access is gained in via
Brookfield rather than impacting the wetlands. He pointed out that
the outlot was originally planned to become part of the manor home
development.
Councilmember Smith stated that she supports condemnation
pointing out that access was always envisioned to come from
Brookfield and all other options were cut off.
CASE NO. 94-16, Council acknowledged an application from Mr. William Lentsch for
LENTSCH , a wetlands permit and driveway setback variance to allow
construction of a single family home on Lot 7, Mendota. Woods
(Arbor Court). Council also acknowledged associated staff reports.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
Abstain:
�
i
1 Krebsbach
Mayor Mertensotto asked about the Planning Commission's
concerns over the grading plan with respect to the location of the
structure on the lot.
Public Works Director Danielson responded that the four concerns
the Commission had raised have been resolved in a revised grading
plan dated September 26, 1994.
Mayor Mertensotto read a list of eight concerns which were
contained in a staff report dated September 22. Mr. Lentsch stated
that all of the concerns except the slope easement on Lot 6 have
been addressed. He informed Council that the driveway has been
moved so that no variance is needed and there is now enough room
to do the proper grading along Lot 6. He stated that a slope
easement on Lot 6 is no longer needed and the grade has been
softened. He explained that the only thing left undone is that he
must draft a drainage easement.
,\
Public Works Director Danielson informed Council that the
easement is necessary to allow the surface water from Lot 6 to drain
across Lot 7.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the driveway location is
predicated on Outlot B having access from Brookfield Lane.
Councilmember Huber moved to approve a wetlands pernut for Lot
7, Mendota Woods to allow construction of a single family home as
proposed on the revised grading plan dated September 26, 1994.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Page No. 4 ]
October 4, 1
PART 150 PROGRAM Administrator Lawell briefly reviewed his report rE
adoption of a 1996 Ldn 65 noise contour map whic
greater number of Mendota. Heights homes within �
25 additional homes are now eligible to participate
, sound insulation program. St. Thomas Academy a
Convent and School are also within the contour, al��
; currently fall outside of the regulations.
Ayes: 4
Nays 0
WORKSHOPS
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
After discussion, Councilmember Huber moved to
participation of those Mendota Heights residential
included within the FAA's 1996 Ldn 65 noise cont
150 aircraft noise sound insulation program and to
work with the MAC to notify properiy owners of t]
their eligibility to voluntarily participate.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Council acknowledged a memo from Administrator
regarding proposed Council workshop topics and da
rding FAA
ncludes a
contour and
the Part 150
Visitation
u�h schools
ize the
r in the Part
rect staff to
program and
It was the consensus to workshop for the purpose of discussing labor
contract demands and acceptable settlement terms after adjournment
of the regular meeting on October 18. �
Staff was directed to research and prepare a report ori the critical
area ordinance prior to the workshop. I
Councilmember Krebsbach moved to conduct a jointl
, CounciUPlanning Commission workshop on Monday,, October 24,
from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. �
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that she would like to discuss
' critical area ordinance changes at the proposed joint
CounciUPlanning Commission� workshop.
COUNCIL COMMENTS
;
,
�
�
�
�
' i
Councilmember Smith briefly reported on this evenirig's joint MAC/
MASAC meeting. I
Page No. 4190
October 4, 1994
ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council,
Councilmember Huber moved that the meeting be adjourned
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:28 o'clock P.M.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
; LIST OF CONTR.ACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY
October 5, 1994
;
+
,
�
Excavation Coatractor License
Trentroy Corporation
General Contractors Licease
Jalco Construction Co., Inc.
Petroleum Maintenance
I
Gas Piping Coatractor License
Dick Lind Co.
HVAC Coatractors Licease
Palen-Rimball Co.
' i
,
f '
e
CITY OF MENDOTA BEIGHTS
TREASIIRER'S REPORT, S$PTII�$R,1994
DAROTA COIINTY STATE BANR
Checking Account 1.05�
Savings Account 2.15�
C.D. Rep. 2.40�
�
Collateral - Bonds
Gov't. Guar.
CHf3ROKFsL STI�TF BANK
C.D. due 10/03/94 C� 3.67�
Saving Cert. 8/22/94 C� 2.50�
Collateral - Bonda
Gov't. Guar.
BAI,ANCE
$ 49,580.48
$ 574.29
0.00
$ 50,154.77
$ 500,000.00
$ 100,000.00
$ 350,000.00
$ 13,952.59
$ 363,952.59
$ 500,000.00
$ 100,000.00
FHLMC 7.23� 12/97 FBS $ 500,008.00
FNMA 6.3% 12/97-95 FBS $ 500,008.00
FHL Mtg. Pool 8% (PRU) $ 254,787.69
FMLC 7� Mtg. Pool (PRU) PAC $ 505,000.00
FMLC 6 1/4� Mtg Pool (PRU) $ 412,782.04
FNMA 6� Pool (PRU) $ 503,865.17
FHLMC 6� Pool c� 101.4375 (PRU)$ 290,547.96
FNMA (1994 Pool) 6 1/2� (PRU) $ 288,702.17
U.S. Treasury Money Mkt (FBS) $ (509,856.52)
Gov't. Securities Fund $1,002,470.00
Zero Cpn T.Bds 7.9% -
2011(J&M) . $ 197,530.00
TOTAL FDNDS AVAILABL}3:
Funds Available 12/31/93
Funds Available 9/30/93
$4,359,951.87
$6,886,428.58
$5,946,590.00
Rates Money
Sept 30 Bank
FBS
Escrow Funds (American National Bank) 9/30/94
City Hall Buildings $ 16,875.00
LES:kkb ;
!
$ 60
0,000.00
$ 60�0, 000. 00
Value 9-31-94 (est. )
Market
2.40�
4.17%
51N0, 000 . 00
503,000.00
26`0, 000.00
465,000.00
40b,000.00
470,000.00
270,000.00
275,000.00
205,000.00
2,115,000.00
213,000.00
�
�
FIRE CALLS NO.
MENDOTA HElGHTS FlRE DEPARTMENT
SEPTEMBER 1994 MONTHLY REPORT
94187 - 94209 NUN�EROFCALLS
FlRE ALARMS DISPATCHED: NUIIIBER
ACTUAL FlRES
Structure - MH Commercial
Structure - MH Residential 1
I Structure - Contract Areas
Vehicle - MH 2
Vehicle - Contract Areas
GrassBrush/No Value MH
Grass/Brush/No Value Contract
MEDICAL '
Assist 5
Extrication 1
HAZARDOUS SITUA710N
Spills/Leaks � 2
Arcing/Shorting :`
Chemical
Power Llne Down
FALSE ALARM ,
Residential Malfunction 6
Commercial Malfunction 3
Unintentional - Commercial 1
Unintentional - Residential
Criminal
GOOD INTENT
Smoke Scare � 1
Steam Mistaken for Smoke
Other 1
MUTUAL AID
TOTAL CALLS 23
LOCATION OF FIRE ALARMS: TO DATE
MENDOTA HEIGHTS 19 180
MENDOTA 0 6
SUNFISH LAKE 1 10
ULYDALE 3 11
OTHER � 0 2
�
TOTAL 23 209
i
WORK PERFORMED i HOUFiS TO DATE
FIRE CALLS ` 497.5 4083
MEETlNGS f 5 0 551.5
DRILLS ; 199 1087
WEEKLYCLEAN-UP ; 52 303.5
PECIALACTIVfiY ; 0 329.5
ADMINISTATIVE � 0 0
F{RE MARSHAL � 73.5 676.5
TOTALS 872 7031
$40,000 $30,000
23
TOTAL MONTHLY FlRE LOSSES
$40,000 $30,000 $0
FIRE LOSS TOTALS MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ALL FIRES, ALL AREAS (MONTH) $70,000
MEND. HTS. ONLY SlAUCT/COtVTENTS
N�ND. HTS.ONLY MISCELLANEOUS
MEND. HTS. TOTAL LOSS TO DATE
BILLING FOR SERVIC
LAST YEAR
157
6
11
11
5
190
LAST YEAR
3676
473.5
1139.5
294
612
0
691
6886
AGENCY TFqS MONTH
MNIDOT
MLW. RR
q�HRR
H
OTt�iS:
TOTALS: $ 0
FlRE MARSHAL'S T1ME FOR
NVSPEC1101V.S
INVESIIGATIONS
R�NSPEC110N
IU�ING.S
ADMINISTRATION
E?��?!���:,�_ i•,�lb
TOTAL
$487.8
TO DATE
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
0
5
2.5
30.5
�:�=,���d::E.���x��1:1�:�9; ;�.�•;c��3�i►, '��+�
0
5
0
0
►I'
The department responded to 23 calls during the month of September. Most calls
were of the investigative type including system malfunctions arid alarms caused by
cooking. Four calls were medical assists and one call was a very serious house fire.
Firefighters were called to 655 3rd Avenue at approximately 4:00 P.M., Sunday,
September 11,1994. Upon arrival, fire crews found a very stubborn fire on the second
floor in a storage area with adjoining bedroom Attack crews fought a very hot fire that
was tough to extinguish due to the walls and partitions in this small confined area. Cause
of the fire is believed to be a young child playing with a lighter. The family was at home
when the fire started, Dollar loss is estimated to be$70,000.
C : ► ► e�
The monthly department drill consisted of rescue training with ropes, ladders, and
the stoke baskets. (�ews practiced along the deep ra.vines of Lilydale by raising training
mannequins in the stokes baskets.
� .� 1 ,� .�
The monthly squad drills consisted of testing each firefighter on their knowledge
of engineering of a fire truck. Each person was given a set of tasks to perform and was
then monitored to see if tasks were done correctly. Getdng water out of the fire truck was
the goal of the evening.
� '.
23
R'iU DAT
209
18
Ed
, eret
L Mke
Aaron
y, Marcus
, NGke
, David
, Paul
�, Scott
Ted
naler, Ror
nn, Mark
Jim
Bill
Jamle
Georg�
�. John
Dave
Jim
Kevir
. Tom
3ttel, Tom
�burger, tG
Dick
E.MEWRUN
F1RE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY WORK PERFORMANCE FOR SEPTEMBER
FRE FRE FRE PERCO�IT CLEAN MONTi�LY GB�1 OFFK'.ER SQUAD I
CALLS CALL CALLS ATTENDED lP dRILL IIRiG MPG DRILL d
9 12.5 103 4% 1 2.5 e
15 17 134 6 0 2 2
9 12.5 9 50% 2.5 2
11 14.5 86 41% 2 2.5 2
7 10.5 78 3796 3 2.5 2
11 14.5 80 38% 1 2.5 2
15 18.5 134 64% 3 7 2
1 1 14.5 .108 1 2.5 2
19 21 167 8 2 2 2
7 10.5 59 28% 2 2.5 2
11 14.5 11 61% 1 2.5 2
12 15.5 78 37% 2 2.5 2
12 15.5 106 51% 2 2.5 2
� 14 17.5 113 5496 1 4.5 2
5 8.5 46 22% 1 2.5
� 93 44%
8 8 128 61% 1
11 14.5 102 49% 3 2 2
17 20.5 147 170% 2 4.5 2
� 8 11.5 79 38% 2.5
12 15.5 102 49% 2 2.5 2
9 11.5 72 34%' 2 2 2
18 21.5 146 0 1 2.5 2
12 12 102 % 2 2.5 2
a ., ., ,.. ,...., .. .. �
13 16.5 129 62% 2 2.5
11 14.5 83 40% 1 2.5 2
14 17.5 81 39% 1 2.5 2
16 19.5 117 56% 2 2.5 2
16 19.5 157 7596 2 2.5 2
15 18.5 108 2�6 2 2.5 2
5 8.5 75 36% 1 2.5
12 15.5 111 53% 2 2
���1
�'�'
� uulll■
52 I 81.5 I 50 I 0
2
1
1
2
1
2
3
5
5
t t
NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNIY CABLE
COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
� 5845 Blaine Avenue
�Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota 55076-1401
612/450-9891 FAX 612/450-9429 TDD 612/552-9675
M E M 0 R A N D U M
T0: City Mayors and Administrators/Clerks:
Inver�Grove Heights
; Lilydale
i Mendota
, Mendota Heights.i
South St. Paul
Sunfish Lake
7 : West St. Paul
FROM: ` Jodie Miller, Executive Direct '�
RE: � NDC4 I�ETING MINUTES, AGENDA, AND FINANCIAL INFORMATI(;
DATE: 29 September 1994
Enclosed is a copy of the UNAPPBOVED minutes from the September 7, 1994 Northern
Dakota County Cable Communications Commission (NDC4) meeting. Please distribute
copies of these minutes to your city council members. Also enclosed is a copy
of the Agenda for the next NDC4 meeting on Wednesday, October 5, i994.
At its September meeting the Commission requested that member cities receive a
copy of financial information pertaining to the status of narrowcasting monies
and the cash balance for NDC4. This information is enclosed. �
Please feel free to contact me at 450-9891 with questions or
the minutes or other cable issues. � ,`
/.]
Encs.
regarding
T . t7 � �0��� \ '
� � �
, NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
FULL COMMISSION MEETING
September 7, 1994
�
The September Commission meeting was called to order by Chair George Tourville at 7:08
p.m. on Wednesday, September 7, 1994. The Pledge of Allegiance was �ecited.
� .
�1. ROLL CALL — Members Present: Lucille Collins, Henry Hovey, Jol
Ista, John Lagoo, Ed Mullarky, John 0'Brien, Mike Sokol, Geori
Richard Vitelli. Members Absent: Alvin Boelter, Roger Conant, k
• Jim Toye. Also Present: B�ian Grogan, NOC4 Attorney; Fran Zi
Cablevision; and Joy Curtin and Jodie Miller (staff). �
2. AGENDA — Motion 9.7.94.1 to adopt the Agenda as submitted was
seconded by H. Hovey, and unanimously ca�ried.
i
3. CONSENT AGENDA -
a
A) Meeting Minutes: Motion 9.7.94.2
meeting minutes as presented was made
unanimously carried.
in Huber, Jodelle
ie Tourvi l le, and
en Henderson, and
:uli, Continental
made by J. Ista,
to approve the August 10; 1994 Commission
by J. Ista, seconded by� L. Collins, and
B) List of Claims: The List of Claims was presented for review.l Motion 9.7.94.3
to approve the List of Claims for the period 8/11/94 - 9/7/94 was made by R.
Vitelli, seconded by E. Mullarky, and unanimously carried. �
4. NDCTV UPOATE - J. Miiler reported that the Volunteer Appreciatiin Picnic held on
August 18th was very successful. Hopefully, this gathering willlbecome an annual
event. Certificates were presented at that time to NDC4 Commissioners and NDCTV
Board members for their service on each respective body. �
The four NOCTV Action Cormnittees which were formed as a result
Planning Sessian in May are meeting regularly and accomplishir
There is a good deal of activity in the Production Servic
possibility of a client wishing to make a prepayment in 1994 fo
in 199�. Chair Tourville recommended staft"��cdn�ul�t wiih the. 'ai
proper way for income of this kind to be recorded.
[Chair Tourville
anyone who .wished
f the Strategic
various tasks.
; area and the
work to be done
�untants on ihe
announced that the phone lines were open throughoutlthe evening for
to place a call to the Commissioners regarding cable issues.]
5. REPORT FROM CONTINENTAL - F. Zeuli reported that, traditionally,
of the busiest times of the year with an increase in subscri
; anticipated that this quarter will prove to be good in terms of 2
subscribers.
� Septembe r i s one
�bership. It is
�dding more cable
� � T
NOC4 Commissian Meeting Minutes
September T, 1994
Page 2
At the October NDC4 meeting, a demonstration will take place for Corrwnissioners to
view and learn more about a new converter box Continental will be using in the
future. As a result of camplaints received at the Public Hearing in June, as well
as from subscribers in general, a decision was made to try to address these
concerns by initiating the use of a different kind of converter box. Deployment
of the box in the NOC service area is expected to take place during the fall of
1994. The ability of the box to be used interactively is one of the many features
which will be demonstrated.
H. Hovey inquired about where to take a box for replacement. F. Zeuli responded
that the box can be taken to either the West St. Paul office on Marie Avenue or
the St. Paul office.
Continental is faced with trying to find channel space for a broadcast shopping
network that has requested to be carried under the "must carry" regulations.
"Must carry" rules mandate that certain broadcast channels must be carried by the
cable providers as part of their channel line-up. Continental will keep the
Commission posted on this issue as it develops. Chair Tourville questioned the
dramatic increase in home shopping channel revenue generated during the month of
June. F. Zeuli explained that the unusual increase is the result of the
completion of a contract that resulted in a one-time payment.
M. Sokol inquired abvut the status of providing converter boxes to those who
requested them in light of the shortage that has occurred. F. Zeuli responded
that filling the orders has'not been as expedient as�Continental would like. The
new converter box may be a solution to this back log problem. �Some discussion has
taken place on doing a"change-out"of boxes within a specific area. It is mor.e
likely, however, that the new boxes will be deployed gradually.
6. NEGOTIATION COMMITTEE REPORT - Committee Chair Mike Sokol reported that the
Cominittee has met a couple of times since the last Commission meeting. Duri�ng
that time the Committee tried to impress upon Continental the need to provide
specifics regarding the company's position on settlement of the Local Origination
(LO) channel issue. He briefly explained the history of the LO channel and NDC4's
position that programming being provided on the channel does not meet the
Franchise requirement for local origination programming. Continental, on the
'''' otli�r �h�nd, cc�ntends �it does meet the ' requi rement:''�' TFi�' Cammi�ttee� was presented
earlier in the day with a p�oposed settlement from Continental that would provide
for in-kind types of services, but no cash settlement. The Committee needs to
meet one more time to review the proposal and come up with a recommendation to the
Commission for resolution of the issue. A copy of the proposal will be sent to
the Commissioners.
J. Miller reported that the Comtnission needs to respond to a letter requesting an
18-month extension on the three variances (I-Net, High Speed Data Transfer, and
Interconnection). B. Grogan explained that the Commission's options are to
approve the request, deny the request on some rational basis, or grant a temporary
extension of 60 - 90 days. He recammended that, in light of discussions taking
place regarding the LO issue, it would be prudent to grant an extension to allow
variance discussions to coincide with the LO negotiations. Motion 9.7.94.4 ta
. �,
NDC4 Cortmissia� Meeting Minutes
September 7, 1994
Page 3
approve a 90-day extension to the three variances was made by R.
by J. Lagoo, and unanimously carried. A decision concerning t
expected to be made at the December Comrnission meeting.
7. CITIZEN COMMENTS - No citizen comments were received.
8. LEGAL COUNSEL REPORT - B. Grogan reported that the Senate ha
action on S. 1822. The bill has several more critics and is expe
on by mid to late September. If the bill passes, it likely
conference cammittee. The entire cable industry would be r2v�
rapidly if the bill passes in its present form. Now is tr
Commission to try to influence representatives who will vote on
Of significance to the Commission is a decision concerning the c�
Bell telephene holding company on the East Coast trying tc
television service in competition with local cable companies via
Through video dialtone, movies can be downloaded via the teleph�
and/or television. The decision on the case was that no local fr
requi'red of the video dialtone provider. Although the case is
this is a major defeat for the cities as franchising authorities
the cable companies. Impact of this decision may be seen in the 1
18 - 24 months when U.S. West is expected to offer the same servi
important to note that cable campanies offer a far wider range �
the proposed video dialtone providers.- In its current form thi
providers can provide limited services similar to cable•comp
different regulations. The court determined that because editc
exerted by cable companies and not by video dailtone providers, w
common carriers, the two can operate under different regulation:
Chair Tourville inquired about responses received f rom Represe
regarding HR 3636 in which Ramstad claims that in the bill telE
will be required to pay the same f ranchise fee and adhere to tl
service standards and PEG channel requirements currently rec
companies. B. Grogan responded that basically the bill provides
few channels but no financial support to operate them. Cities w�
to draw�-operational monies� out� of•their-.own budgets. It was agre
need to point out to the representatives the differences in
provides and what cities and franchising authorities want. Staff
work with legal counsel to develop a response to the senators and �
Potential loss of local control is imminent. F. Zeuli added
industry looks for advocacy from cable commissions and cities
battle to bring the best services possible to citizens and subsci
forward to fostering a good partnership with local f ranchising <
9. STAFF REPORTS - J.
, by all NDC member
anticipated approv�
weeks.
Miller reported that to date the 1995 budget h
cities except Inver Grove Heights and M�
1 will be obtained by these two cities with
�itelli, seconded
se issues can be
s not yet taken
cted to be voted
wi11 go into a
�lutionized very
e time for the
the bill.
se of a regional
provide cable
video dialtone.
�ne i nto the VCR
�nchise would be
being appealed,
, �as well as for
�cal area within
:,es here. It is
f services than
video dialtone
�nies but under
rial control is
�o are viewed as
ntative Ramstad
phone companies
e same customer
uired of cable
for requiring a
�uld be expected
;a tr,�t tt,e�� ,5
what this bill
was directed to
epresentatives.
that the cable
in this ensuing
ibers and looks
uthorities.
�s been approved
�ndota. It is
i n the next few
�h �
NDC4 Cortmission Meeting Minutes
September 7, 1994
Page 4
A sample video of a proposed news show is nearly complete and will be presented
to the seven cities along with a proposal. A�1000 donation was received from
former governor Harold Stassen who has produced programming in the NDCTV facility
over the past four years and who is an advocate of public access television. A
special acknowledgement will be made of the contribution which will likely go
toward funding a special project in Harold Stassen's name. Mr. Stassen's name
will be placed on a plaque displayed in the NDC facility.
J. Miller reported that nearly three weeks ago she requested a proposal on
insurance coverage and possible consolidation of policies from the current agent.
To date no proposal has been sent. Conway Olson f rom T.C. Field & Company would
like to submit a•proposal, but in order to obtain certain information from the
LMCIT, he must be named "agent of record." Staff believes a change in agents is
in order. Motion 9.7.94.5 to write a letter to the LMCIT naming Conway Olson as
Agent of Record so he can.further investigate the various insurance requirements
and present a proposal to the Commission, was made by R. Vitelli, seconded by L.
Collins, and unanimously carried.
The revised 1995 budgets along with data showing the status of narrowcasting
monies and the cash balance were distributed. 1995 is the last year for payment
of $27,000 in narrowcasting monies; however, there will be nearly $46,000 unspent
after that time. Staff was directed to send this information to each member city
for their information.
The MACTA Mini-Conference will take place September 9th. Jodel7e Ista will attentl
the morning session; anyone interested in attending the afternoon session should
contact staff.
An Action Alert pertaining to S 1822 was distributed. It is important to send
letters and faxes and make telephone calls to senators within the next 12 days.
Staff was directed to prepare an official letter signed by Chair Tourville urging
the senators not to support the bill and listing all the cities represented.
10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - J. Ista inquired about the status of determining an award
for employees who have been with NDC4/NDCTV for at least five years. J. Miller
responded that staff is in the process of investigating the matter.
11. NEW BUSINESS - J. Ista complimented the music videos that have been playing on
the Multi-Faith Channel 34. She further cammented that she received two
complaints regarding programming on Regional Channel 6.
R. Vitelli and J. Ista reported that within the past few weeks old city meetings
have been appearing at the end of current meeting tapes. Staff will follow-up on
this problem.
J. Ista announced that the membership campaign "Drive '95 -- Join NDCTV" is
underway and Commissioners are encouraged to support the effort.
NOC4 Cortmission Meeting Minutes
September 7, 1994
Page 5 '
12.
J. Milller announced that on Tuesday, September 13th NDCTV/NDC4 w�
live coverage of the West St. Paul Primary election beginning �
Channels 18 and 33. Several candidate forums will also be cable
information before the general election. I
11 be providing
�t 8:00 p.m. on
cast for public
ADJOURNMENT - Motion 9.7.94.6 to adjourn the meeting was made�by E. Mullarky,
seconded by H. Hovey, and carried. The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,�
Joy A. Curtin
NDC4 Administrative Assistant
and Recording Secretary
i
�
► � Y
USE OF NARROWCASTING SETTLEMENT REVENUES
rCPENDITURES BY CIN:
}
IGH
MH
SSP
WSP
TOTAL
;
�
CASH FLOW PROJECTIONS:
DESIGNATED FOR
EQUIP. REPLACEMENT
SPENT FOR EQUIP. REPL.
.RRY TO NEXT YEAR
1991* 1992* 1993* 1994** 1995** TOTALS
------ ------ ------ ------ - ! --- ------
$13,138 $4,457 $3,534 $3,797 $24,926
1,828 4,457 3,534 3,797 � 13,616
13,138 4,457 3,534 3,797 24,926
13,138 4,457 3,534 3,797 24,926
1 241 $0 17 829 14 136 i15 188 394
$10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000
0 0 0 11,641
10 000 20 000 000 28 359
FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS $17,000 $27,431
IN CITY HALLS
$9,759 $8,930
SPENT FOR CAP. IMPR'S. 6,569 34,672 17,829 2,496
CARRY TO NEXT YEAR 10 431 241 070 435
* Actual Expenditures
** Estimated Expenditures (Budget)
359 $50,000
11,641
359 359
,435 $85,000
5,189 76,754
$,246 246
NDC4 CASH ANALYSIS
Revenues
Expenses
Rev's over(under) ExQ's
Net Inc./(Dec.) in Fund Bal.
Add back:
Non—op. rev's
Non—cash exp's
Less:
Capital Improvements
Net inc./(Dec.) in Cash
Cash Balance 12/31/93
Estimated Increase 1994
Est. Cash Balance 12/31 /94
Estimated Increase 1995
Est. Cash Balance 12/31 /95
BANK BALANCES 8/22/94
Checking
Money Market
I nvestments
Total Cash and Equivalents
Y—T—D Estimate
as of 8/22/94
$155,332
155,932
600
(600)
27, 000
13,109
2 496
37, 013
ESTI NiATEC�
CASH FLOW
$108,147
31,428
1�39,575
0
139.575
$1, 672.47
43,149.65
132,000.00
176.822.12
Estimated Total
1994
$309,123
303,668
5, 455
5, 455
27, 000
13,109
14 136
31,428
ESTI�il1ATED
DESIGNATED FUNDS
$123,632
124,228
126.828
Budget
1995
$306,050
333,373
27 323
(27,323)
27, 000
15,512
15 189
0
r • " •
' CITY OF MSNDOTA HEIGHTS
� DAKOTA COIINTY, MINNESOTA
PARRS AND RECREATION COb�lISSION MINIITSS
OCTOBER 11, 1994
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and R�
Commission was held on Tuesday, October 11, 1994, in the �
Large Conference Room, 1101 Victoria Curve. The meeting w
to order at 6:35 o'clock P.M. The following members wer�
Kleinglass, Libra, Norton and Spicer. Commissioners Dar
Linnell were excused. Also present were Administrative i
Kevin Batchelder and Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander
APPROVAL OF MINIITLS
Commis s ioner
minutes.
Commissioner
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
Norton moved to approve the August�
Kleinglass seconded the motion.
RESIGNATION OF VICRI RATZ
Vice Chair Spicer announced that the City has re�
resignation letter from Vicki Katz, Chair of the P
Recreation Commission. Spicer stated Ms. Ratz has ac
job at a non-profit organization whose board meeti
occur on the same Tuesday evenings as the Parks Com
Spicer stated that Ms. Katz has stated she will no 1
able to devote her time to the Commission. Spicer st
Commission will miss Vicki and that he has personally
all of the years he has worked together with her
Commission.
RSQIIEST TO FLOOD
PARR PLACL POND
Mr. John Tuohy, a resident of Park Place, state
appearing on behalf of his wife, Jean, who is a boaY
for the Park Place Homeowner's Association. Mr. TuoY
he�has had the opportunity to read the staff inemo
difficulties that present themselves for City involv
the flooding o€ the Park Place pond. Mr. Tuoh�
residents in the neighborhood shovel and clear the ic
pond for use by neighborhood children and adults. H
that by mid season, the ice is in pretty poor shape
Asaociation had discussed this matter and was wond
they could get the Public Works crews to help flood t
once or twice a year just to touch up the ice. M
stated he understands other neighborhoods have asked i
creation
:ity Hall
�s called
pre�sent
berg', and
.ssis�tant
�
9, 1994
i
:eived a
�rks i and
cepted a
igs also
nission.
�nger be
atedlthe
enj oyed
on ; the
� he, is
i member
� stated
and � the
�ment in
stated
� on I the
� stated
and i the
ring if
iis rink
. Tuohy
�r this
t
Parks and Recreation Commission
October li, 1994
Page 2
and have been denied. He stated his neighborhood is not
asking for special treatment but was just exploring the
possibility of providing a little better ice on thei�r
neighborhood pond.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder explained the park crew is
reluctant to take on this additional work due to their
concerns about their ability in providing staff time and
budgetary resources. Batchelder stated the park crews need
additional help to complete the flooding and maintenance of
the existing ice rinks and hockey rinks. He stated that
seasonal employees and volunteers from Mendota Heights
Athletic Association assist the park crews in maintaining the
City rinks. Batchelder also stated there is some concern
about using the fire hydrant across the street from the Park
Place pond because its main purpose is for fire emergencies
and there is a chance that if it is not operated correctly, it
could become frozen and unavailable for fire emergencies.
Vice Chair Spicer stated that for many years Mendota Heights
Athletic Association has provided volunteers to take care of
the ice flooding in the parks. Spicer stated the City hires
additional park helpers to mow grass and take care of the
parks in the summer but that these employees are laid off in
the winter and that there is a really sma.11 park crew
available for winter time park maintenance. Spicer stated
that City staff could talk to Parks Leadperson Terry Blum to
discuss whether it is possible to do this on a once or twice
a winter basis.
Mr. Tuohy stated that it is only possible to skate on the Park
Place pond if the pond freezes before there is a snowfall. He
stated if there is a large snowfall prior to the freezing of
the ice, the ice does not seem to work very well all winter.
The Commission discussed other skating opportunities in the
area and discussed the potential enlargement of the free
skating area at Wentworth Park. Batchelder stated that in
1995 the Capital Improvement Plan intended to switch the
larger warming house from Ivy Falls Park to Wentworth Park and
at that time we could look at also enlarging the free skating
area at Wentworth Park.
Spicer stated that the Parks Commission cannot authorize this
additional time on behalf of the park crews to maintain the
Park Place pond, however he stated that maybe Parks Leadperson
Blum can provide some advice to the homeowners about improving
the ice in this area. The Commission directed staff to talk
to the parks department and determine if some assistance can
be provided and to contact the homeowner's association.
Parks and Recreation
October 11, 1994
Page 3
IVY PARR LANDSCAPE PT.AN
Vice Chair Spicer stated he understood that the lands
that the Parks Commission had discussed with the En�
Department last year did not work very well and t
beautification is needed in ivy Hills Park. Park:
Manager Kullander stated the City had received many c�
about the lack of landscaping in the pond area and t:
pretty bare in this area. Kullander stated the contr
mixed grass seed with the wild flower seed when seE
sloped areas along the road and the berm. KullandE
this is a large budget project and that requesting ac
funding to provide adequate landscaping in the
something the Parks Commission should consider.
Vice Chair Spicer inquired if $15,000 to $20,00
guideline, with the plan done by City staff wou
responsible approach to addressing the landscape issi
Hills Park. The Parks Commission discussed ap�
funding amounts to provide adequate landscaping in tY
Kullander stated if the Parks Commisaion desired thi;
by'a landscape consultant, it would cost approximate]
to'$5,000 for design services.
Commissioner Libra recommended that City Council a
money from the Ivy Falls Storm Project to develop a 1
plan either by staff or an outside consultarit, and
implement the plan in the Spring of 1995 with a not t
total cost of $20,000.
Commissioner Norton seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
The Parks Commission discussed the types of amenit:
would like included in the Ivy Hills Park landscape pl
Commission discussed providing planters, either made
rock or limestone, paved trails, tree plantir
wildflowers, and cattails and marsh grasses for the w�
The Commission stated a firm that specializes in wi:
plantings should be used to establish those areas de�
on the plan for low maintenance natural wildflower or
grass areas.
WATER RESOIIRCBS EDIICATION PLAN
ssion
�
:ape �plan
�ineering
hat more
Proj ect
�mplaints
iat it is
ictor had
ding' the
r stated
lditional
park is
i, as a
.d be a
e i.n' Ivy
:opriate
is park.
be done
� $2;500
ithorize
�ndscape
then to
� exceed
.es they
an. The
; out of
.gs and
:tlarids.
_dflower
aignated
pra'irie
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated he had combined�two
issues into one agenda item. He stated the Parks Co�uniss'ion
` has discussed pond preservation at past meetings and had been
' kept up-to-date on Dakota County's water resources edu�,cation
Parks and Recreation Commission
October 11, 1994
Page 4
plan. He stated this plan could be used by local communities
to educate the public a.bout water quality and water
preservation efforts. He stated the other issue had been
Commissioner Norton's inquiry at the August meeting if the
Parks Commission could discuss the use of chemical fertilizers
on City owned grass by our park crews.
Commissioner Norton stated the City should take the lead in
practicing environmentally friendly approaches to landscape
maintenance �.f we are going to be educating the public on
sensible urban lawn care. Commissioner Norton felt that staff
should explore ideas about using more natural area and native
grasses that are low maintenance that do not require
fertilizer. Norton stated the City should take the lead in
providing attractive alternative landscaping that requires low
maintenance.
Parks Project Manager Rullander stated the additional Ivy Park
landscape improvements be planned in this fashion with the
wildflower plantings and the fringe areas around the pond can
be addressed in this fashion. He stated this could be done
instead of having totally mowed grass area it could be planted
in native vegetation in areas not used for recreational uses.
Rullander stated efforts could be made in educating the Public
Works and Parks Department workers on wildflowers and more
natural species as opposed to the training they receive in
turf management . Commissioner Norton stated the City of Edina
was recently covered in the Star Tribune for their efforts in
environmentally friendly lawn maintenance practices.
Kullander stated MnDOT has been experimenting with wildflower
and different grasses, such as salt tolerant grasses, and that
they have established specs that contractors are becoming
familiar with and that the City can bid out for wildflower and
other grass type uses. The Commission requested that staff
look into this further and that they should stay on top of
this issue and bring it back to a future Park Commission
meeting. The Commission directed staff to analyze the use of
fertilizer on City property, analyze where fertilizer is not
needed , analyze where "zero phosphorus" is appropriate and if
it is possible to monitor fertilizer levels through soil
testing and explore the posaibilities of more natural areas.
Commissioner Libra stated that the Stenciling Program should
move forward for protecting the ponds and storm water areas.
The Parks Commission discussed volunteering their time to
participate in stenciling and asked staff to bring this back
at a mid winter meeting.
Parks and Recreation
October 11, 1994
Page 5
bIl1RRA GR.ANTS
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated the Nati
Service is considering the establishment of grants
programs for the Missisaippi National River and R
Area (NIl�iRRA) . Batchelder stated the National Parl
desires to identify the range and magnitude of possi
projects within the river corridor so that they can
funding levels and technical assistance. Batcheld�
the parks services asked all jurisdictions in the co
respond with grant proposal ideas. The Commission
possible grant ideas and felt that staff should send
proposal ideas to the National Park Service for the
items:
1. Scenic Overlook
2. New Park Development
3. Informational Materials
4. Non Point Source Pollution
5.� Educational Programs ,
6.� Scenic Bluff, Overlook and
and Storm Water
Bird Watching
The Commission directed staff to prepare these scop
for the National Park Service.
Vi�RBAL UPDATisS
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated the next me
November 8 is the same day as an election and that the
cannot start until 8:00 P.M. Batchelder inquired
Commission wanted to meet on a different evening or
would like to begin their meeting at 8:00 o'clock P
Commission directed staff to prepare the November park
for their regular day beginning at 8:00 o'clock P.M.
Batchelder distributed a petition that had been rea
City Council at their October 4 meeting from resident
Brentwood and Kensington neighborhoods officially pet.
the City of Mendota Heights not to construct the
shelter structure in North Kensington Park. Batchelde
this park shelter had been included as an option at
the City Council approved the concept plans. He st<
City Council directed the architect to include the sh
the final plans and apecifications as an option
considered at the time when the final plans are app:
bids awarded.
�
Vice Chair Spicer stated it has been the Parks Coi
contention all along that there should not be a picnic
located in North Kensington Park. Commissioner Libra
sion
al Park
d grant
reation
Service
�
e grant
r st'ated
�ridor to
iscu'ssed
in grant
ollowing
I
�
Upi
ities
I
f orms
eting on
meeting
if � the
if they
,M. �The
meeting
:ived� by
3 of �the
.tioning
picnic
� stated
;he time
.ted the
:lter in
to be
�oved or
I
nnission
shelter
stated
Parks and Recreation Commission
October 11, 1994
Page 6
that all of the pointa the residents are making in the
petitions are points that the Parks Commissi�on has already
made. Libra stated if the residents in this area want a more
passive park then perhaps the landscape plan should be scaled
back for the design of this park and it may not be necessary
to build such a masterpiece in North Kensington Park.
Commissioner Libra stated the Parks Commission should
acknowledge this petition and he moved to recommend that the
shelter be eliminated.
Commissioner Norton seconded the motion.
AYLS: 3
NAYS: 0
ABSTAIN: 1, RLI3INGLASS
Commissioner Kleinglass stated that he abstained
on this recommendation because this item will come
Parks Commission at the time of the final plans
addressed at that time.
from voting
back to the
and can be
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated that the Kensington
Park residents had expresaed concern about traffic on
Stockbridge Avenue where the trail crosses from North
Kensington Park from South Kensington Park and he stated that
Joni Giese, landscape architect, will be addressing this as
part of the final plans.
Parks Project Manager Rullander described the ongoing park
improvements that were approved for 1994 including the
enlargement of the Friendly Hills skating rink. Rullander
stated this proj ect had been completed and included the moving
of the warming house, the realignment of electric and gas
service, enlarging of the skating rink and redesign of the
drainage and the restoration of the grass that was disturbed
during the enlargement. Kullander stated the park crews took
a lot of pride in this project and are looking forward to
having a larger skating rink to serve the non-hockey public.
Rullander stated that the Wentworth Park play equipment had
been ordered and the City is awaiting delivery. Rullander
stated the bridge for Valley Park had come in very high during
the bidding process, so staff is re-bidding the project and is
looking at alternatives in order to keep the price of the
bridge under $10,000.
Rullander stated the informational signs in the parks has been
put on hold, however the maps for the trail system are being
� Parks and Recreation
Octaber 11, 1994
� Page 7
updated with the receipt of new highway maps. He :
signs should be able to be instalied in the City
early spring.
The Commission discussed s�enciling mile markers on 1
and discussed the fact that perhaps the Commi�si
spend a Sa�urday or Sunday doing �he stenciling then
order to give �hem an opportunity to see the park .
pravide a bene�it �o the City. The Commi�sion askec
place �.his on �.he next agenda.
Kullander described the Crown Point washout and the
NInDOT has hired a contractar to fix th3s. Cammissioi
inquired abou� work going on in Valley Park north
Avenue. Rullander stated that washouts had occurre
area and that gabions are being installed by
contractor who is working on �.he �vy Falls Project.
�
Ku].lander sta�ed the City staff had taken some
analyzing the �ituatian at the archery range and that
proposing �ome signs be installed along the trail
trail users. He �tated that selective cutting of t
would establish shooting lanes tha� wil.l be separa�ed
trail area with a natural barrier, that signs
installed announcing the rules of the archery range
staff is consi.dering using metal. poles ta install
bails. He stated that for the mos� part, people
bringing their own targets to the range.
Kullander stated he attended the public hearing
Count�'s North Urban Trail Plan. He stated a fe�
Heights residents also attended and apoke in oppositi
trail if it was in their front yard. Ku1l.ander st
North Urban Trail Plan next�gaes to �.he County Boax
approved, it will be aent to the Metropolitan Coun
stateci �he Metropolitan CaunciZ will be reviewing thi
determine if regional �rail standards can be deviate�
far as the wid�h of the trail and baulevards.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder submitted pici
recent vandalism in Ci�y parks, particularly spray
various park facilitie�.
Commissioner Libra stated the soccer season is now
the Mendota Iieights Athletic A.ssociation and they had
people participate. He s�ated the Mendota Heights
Association's recent newsletter thanked the City for
s�ion
:ated the
park� in
�
�
i
ze trails
n should
�elves in
►�tem and
�taff to
�,
:act i�hat
�r Nartan
of Marie
l in �his
�he I�ame
time in
�taff is
warning
ne grass
f rom the
ould be
�.nd �hat
�helhay
will be
1
f or i the
Mendota
n to the
�ted�the
t and if
�il. � He
plan to
f rom as
of ', the
ting of
r �for
r �&00
Let1C
good
Parks and Recreation Commission
October 11, 1994
Page 8
job they have done with the fields and that for the most part
all of the soccer fields have worked very well. Libra stated
the City has done a great job both in maintenance and in
scheduling of the soccer fields and that Mendota Heights
Athletic Association is grateful.
The Commission discussed the deterioration of the Wentworth
Park soccer field. Libra stated that perhaps Wentworth Park
needs to be regulated because of the poor drainage of the
field and when it receives heavy use gets quiet muddy. Libra
stated the Kensington fields are extremely noisy with the air
noise and freeway noise, but otherwise are excellent fields..
PARR VISION AND PHILOSOPHY
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated that the City
Council had desired that the Commission consider and review
various park policies in order to establish a mission, a
vision or philosophy for both parks and recreation. He stated
this is a high priority on the Target List for 1993/1994. He
stated that specifically the Council requested the Commission:
1. Evaluate future capital improvement needa within the
parks system.
2. Clarify the purpose and use of various park and
recreation funding sources.
3. Review the current park dedication formula.
4. Review the need for additional recreational programming.
Batchelder stated the Commission has completed Item No. 1
which is to establish a capital improvement plan. The
Commission discussed establishing policies for the Special
Park Fund, park dedications and to review the current status
of the recreation program.
Vice Chair Spicer stated there are so many things the City
could be doing if it had a full time recreation department.
Spicer mentioned golf programs and ski trips as possibilities.
The Commission requested that Recreation Programmer Shelli
Morgan appear on a future agenda to provide a review of the
recreation programs in the past year and to get her ideas
about future recreation programs that the City could have.
The Commission discussed a document entitled "The Role of the
Park and Recreation Commission" and felt that the work which
had been done in 1992 is the basic framework for a mission
statement. The Commission asked staff to incorporate this
language into a mission statement and perhaps this could be
added as a Purpose section in the Ordinance which establishes
the Parks and Recreation Commission.
Parks and Recreation�
October 11, 1994
, Page 9
ELECTION OF OFFIC$RS
The Commission directed staff to place on the Novem]
the selection of a Vice Chair to replace Acting Ch<
until the February meeting.
ADJOIIRNNlENT
ssion
er agenda
ir Spicer
There being no further business, the Parks and Rec
Commission adjourned its meeting at 5:10 o'clock P.Nl.
Respectfully submitted,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
,
reation
i ,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 13, 1994�
T0: Mayor, City Council and City Administ t
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer ��
SUBJECT: Sewer Utility Rates
DISCIISSION
At the time that the 1995 Budget was proposed, we were looking
at a substantial (!S'�) increase for our sewer billing for 1995.
It was expected that a similar trend would continue into11996 and
1997. ;
We have now obtained flow readings for the year 1994Ito date,
and it appears that our flow will be substantially less than in
1993, and just about in line with our estimated billing for 1994.
The bottom line for the future, at this time, seems to be that in
1995 we will pay a makeup charge of $151,000 which will drop to the
$20/$30,000 range in 1996. !
While we were looking at a substantial jump in sewer rates in
1995, I believe that we should try to get through 1995 with a small
rate increase and make up the deficit in 1996 when the billing will
be reduced substantially (by about $125,000). �
I
. In view of two substantial increases in the last two years, I
would try and hold off another major increase for 1995 and reassess
the flow levels at mid year. We will continue to monitor the flow
levels until January, and if they continue at the current levels,
we will probably recommend about a five percent increase forithe
1995 sewer rates. I �,
ACTION RE4IIIRLD
I No'action is needed. This is for Council informa
� i �
LES:kkb
�
y ; �
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 13, 199
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer �
i
SUBJECT: Equipment Certificates and G.O. Revenue Bonds
DISCIISSION
At this time it is necessary for the City to �
financing projects which have been ongoing during the
First we have the issuance of Equipment Certifica�
for the fire truck refurbishing and the purchase of t]
trucks for the street department. The amount necessa�
$290,000 which will have maturities over the next five y
total payments for the existing certificates and the new
be in the range of $100,000 annually for the next four
then drop in the fifth year. This is in line with the pl
for Equipment Certificates.
lete the
.r. �
s to pay
two new
will be
�rs . � The
ssue will
ears and
ined �levy
The second isaue would be G.O. Revenue Bonds whichlwould be
payable primarily from the revenue of the Storm Wate� Utility
($775,000) and the Water Revenue Fund ($525,000). We currently
have under construction or planned six storm water pr �ects of
which Ivy Falls is the major cost. The total cost of alli the
projects is $1,050,000 of against which we have utility reserve and
other funds to bring the actual issue down to $775,000. � �
The water revenue bonds can be combined with the st
issue to avoid the costs of a second iasue for the wa
repairs. The issue proposes $525, 000 for this project. 4i
have not yet been received, the amount borrowed plus a
funds available should be adequate to complete the proje
are to be received during the winter.
Ma�turities of the two issues have been set over �
period and will require about 60 percent of the anticipate
of the systems and leave funds to accumulate for other pr
the future.
We�would anticipate selling the bonds on November 1
delivery can be completed before year end.
rm water
�r tower
.ile bids
dit i�.onal
t. Bids
14 year
revenue
� ects in
I
so �that
ACTION REQIIIRED
If Council concurs, adopt Resolution No. 94- , RESOLUTION
PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC SALE OF $290,000 GENER.AI� OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT
CERTIFICATES OF 1994 and Resolution No. 94- , RESOLUTION
PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC SALE OF �1,300,000 GENER.AI� OBLIGATION REVENUE
BONDS OF 1994. .
LES:kkb
t �i
{ Proposed Projects to be Fiaanced by Issuance of
G.O. Revenue Bonds
Storm Water IItility Projects
City Share
Mayfield Heights
Valley Creek
Colony Storm.Sewer
River Rain Storm Sewer
Thompson Avenue
� Ivy Creek
i
Reveaues Available �
City Funds
Storm Water Funds
West St. Paul
Borrowing
� �
Average Annual Debt Service
Less Special Assessments
� Paid from Revenues
Anticipated Annual Revenue
Balance for Opr. and Projects
�
L�ater Revenue Fuad
Anticipated Surcharge
&' WAC Charges
Avg. Debt Service
,
Balance for Opr. & Projects
i '.
$ 50,000
$ 6,000
$ 60,000
$ 50,000
$ 10,000
S 850,000
$1,031,000
$ 150,000
$ 56,000
$ 50,000
$ 256,000
$ 775,000
$ 80,000
$ 13,500
$ 66,500
$ 110,000
$ 43,500
$ 120,000
$ 65, 000
$ 55, 000
CITY OF MENDOTA H$IGHTS
DAROTA COIINTY, MINDTESOTA
RESOLIITION NO. 94-
RESOLIITION PROVIDING FOR PIIBLIC SALE OF $1,300,000
GENERAL OBLIGATION REVENDE BONDS OF 1994
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Finding; Amount and Purpose. It is hereby found
determined and declared that this City should issue
$1,300,000 General Obligation Revenue Bonds of 1994 (the
"Bonds") to finance the construction of various
improvements to the storm water utility and the water
system of the City.
2. Appointment of Financial Advisor. The City Council does
hereby appoint The Shaughnessy Company, in St. Paul,
Minnesota, to act as its financial advisor to the City
for the sale of the Bonds.
3. Meetina. This Council shall meet at the time and place
specified in the form of notice hereinafter contained for
the purpose of opening and considering sealed bids for,
and awarding the sale of, the Bonds.
4. Notice of Bond Sale. The Ci
and directed to cause not
purpose of said meeting to
newspaper of the City anc
Review not less than ten (1(
sale, as provided by law,
substantially the form set
hereto.
.y Clerk is hereby authorized
.ce of the time, place and
>e published in the official
in Northwestern Financial
) days in advance of date of
which notice shall be in
forth in Exhibit A attached
5. Official Terms of Bond Sale. The terms and conditions of
said Bonds and the sale thereof are fully set forth in
the "Official Terms of bond Sale" attached hereto as
Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference.
6. Official Statement. The City Clerk and Treasurer and
other officers or employees of the City hereby authorized
to participate in the preparation of an official
, statement for the Bonds with The Shaughnessy Company.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resalution was
duly seconded by member and, afVter �ull
discussion �hereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the
�ollowing vated in �avor thereaf: �
and the following voted agains� the same:
�
Adop�ed by �he City CounciZ of the City of Mendo�a He
18th day of October, 1994.
�
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
i �
a
CITY COUNCIL
CITY C}F MENDOTA
Charles E. Mertensot
Mayor
s �.his
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNFSOTA
RESOLIITION NO. 94-
RESOLIITION PROVIDING FOR PIIBLIC SALE OF $290,000
GENERAi� OBLIGATION EQIIIPN�NT CERTIFICATLS OF 1994
BE IT RESOLYED by the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Finding; Amount and Purpose. It is hereby found,
determined and declared that this City should issue
$290,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates of
1994 (the "Certificates") to finance the acquisition of
various capital equipment for the City.
2. Appointment of Financial Advisor. The City Council does
hereby appoint The Shaughnessy Company, in St. Paul,
Minnesota, to act as its financial advisor ta�the City
for the sale of the Certificates.
3. Meetina. This Council shall meet at the time and place
specified in the form of notice hereinafter contained for
the purpose of opening and considering sealed bids for,
and awarding the sale of, the Certificates.
4. Notice of Certificate Sale. The City Clerk is hereby
authorized and directed to cause notice of the time,
place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the
official newspaper of the City and in Northwestern
Financial Review not less than ten (10) days in advance
of date of sale, as provided by law, which notice shall
be in aubstantially the form set forth in Exhibit A
attached hereto.
5. Official Terms of Certificate Sale. The terms and
conditions of said Certificates and the sale thereof are
fully set forth in the "Official Terms of Certificate
Sale" attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated
herein by reference.
6. Official Statement. The City Clerk and Treasurer and
other officers or employees of the City are hereby
authorized to participate in the preparation of an
official statement for the Certificates with The
Shaughnessy Company.
<
;
;
The mo�.ion for the adoption of the foregaing re
duly seconded by member and,
discussion �hereof and upon a vote being taken t
following voted in favar thereaf:
and the following voted agaa.nst the same:
Adapted by �he City Cauncil of the Ci�y of Mendo�a
1.8th day of October, 1994.
ATTEST:'
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
�
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HE
Mayor
E.
czan was
er �ull
son, the
�his
:
�
i i i f • :1 :
1 �! i
' Qctober 6,
TO: Ma.yor, City Council and City Ad ' s
� FROM: � 7ames E. Danielson, Public Works D'
SUBJECT: 1994 5treet Overlay
Job No. 9411
DISCUSSIUN:
The cantract has been completed for the 1994 Street Overlay project and is
final paymernt.
Total contract cost far this project was $48,258.50 not inclading �ngineeru
easements' and overhead.
RECC►l��IlV1.7ENDATIUN:
I recammend Council accept the pmject and approve the final payment to
Raadways; Inc, of Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota.
ACTION REOUIRED:
�
If Council concurs with the recammendation they should pass a motion a
Resolution No. 94-�, RESOLUTION ACCEPT�.ING WORK AND APPRQ
PAYl�LENT FOR 1994 SZZi.EET OVL+'RLAY PRQJECT ,
�
�
�
FIlVAL
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 94
RE50LUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING
FINAL PAYMENT FOR 1994 STREET OVERLAY PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Mendota Heights on
September 12, 1994, Bituminous Roadways, Inc. of Inver Grove Heights, Mi.nnesota, has
satisfactorily completed the street overlay in accordance with such contract.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ItFSOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and
approved; and
BE IT FiJRTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby directed to
issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract in the amount of $48,258.50 taking
the contractor's receipt in full.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 18th day of October, 1994.
CITY COUNCII.
CITY OF MENDOTA I�IGHTS
By,
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
T0:
FROM: �
SUBJECT:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 13, 1 94
Mayor, City Council and City Administ
Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer
Request for Sign Permit Approval
GNB Battery Technology located at 1110 Highway 110
GNB Incorporated) has changed their company name. They ;
have six signs located on their property. GNB Battery T
is now proposing to change the existing sign faces to ind
new company name. See attached proposed and exist
drawings.
DISCIISSION
GNB Battery Technology presently have a vertical monu
(Drawing A); a horizontal monument sign (Drawing
directional signs (Drawings C-1 and C-2); and a directi�
indicating shipping/receiving dock. GNB is also requestir.
signs one which contains 3.75 square feet (Drawing D) and
(Drawing E) which contains 5.32 square feet indicating the
entrance on the south side of the building. The attached
shows building and signage locations. As a point of inf�
previous sign permits issued to GNB were in 1971 and 1982.
new proposed signs will not exceed what the Zoning Ordinan
in the B-lA Zoning District.
Since it appears that existing signage is in place by
sign permits issued by the City, and the two new proposed
not exceed the maximum allowable signs as per the Zoning O:
I recommend that City Council grant approval of chan
existing sign faces with the new company name and that app
two new signs, sign D containing 3.75 square feet an�
containing 5.32 square feet.
ACTION REQIIIRED
{
If City Council wishes to implement the above recom
a motion should be passed granting the issuance of a s:
which would allow new sign faces for GNB Battery Tech�
shown on drawings A, B, C-1, C-2, and that two new
approved, as shown on Drawings D and E. .
f ormerly
�resently
:chnology
.cate the
�.ng sign
:nt sign
); two
al sign
two new
.e other
ite plan
rmation,
The two
e allows
revious
igns do
.�..�...,... ,
ing the
�val for
Sign E
idation,
i permit
ogy, as
igns be
�
� Propased
� Bullding ,.,�
"�,� • � � r,q . ....+!'• .• `�!�!'� • . «�.
•* + �� .! � �!"n. , . � . �%%/�%:' �
� �-r•,: ���, � /j�. ''�
- � � '`� '��� ���-�'.: �
� '�. i
� � ' �' ._._ � 1
Y' {, ,*�. `���`~� � ..�
� A ,��__.:� �� �j�` ---. .�
-"'' � •. hr� ' + � �'t/S : - .;
. � . � , �l f �,;,�;;�•!'L ''
� • �` •. �g� ...�` f : • '�
3 � _ �'•. �adp► jto`�
��i
. � ��r� • r � a � �r�� • � �� • � ��.� w � �� • � M.w.� s � �wr� s � �r . � r�r1w.� • � ��r � � �
+..�'G'; rj � .
.
� , ..#„v a v:a hv ot.�,� �
� b.�t,,� C� Z; J 4� ,�� --� �� :
..�
0
� I
buifding TY1 iR�
��H�
'1oQN h
n��A
�
��Q N -
� � �, �
� ,
x
i
�_L1,� t.11ll � � ,--�� -
? N� 7��,�j[� --� o
+�, �--�� S+� �; s v o �-- 2►�1�(� ,.�* � « bd `�` �;
� • e �..�.► • � �o.� r • r � .�.n . • • �� • � +.� • � �.� s � +�� : e +..�. e��+ • . �... � •
Cen�ku�r�r Qo�n�-e i3r►�'�.
1
•
'
:
--- - - _.__ . . � . . .._.� , . �.�... . . �. . . � . . �. . . �..,. . . .�. . . ..r. . . .�. , .
, ,u.�,w.....; .. , .. �
, �ROPERTY DATA
,
� G.N.B. Headquarters
; 1110 Highway I10
Mendota Heights, Minnesota
LEGAL AND TAX DATA
, Legal Description:
Parcel I:
That part of Lot 1 Auditor's
Subdivision No. 34, according {
plat thereof on file or of record
office of the Register of Deeds, :
County, Minnesota, lying easte:
line 688.0 feet westerly of, mea;
right angles to and parallel wit
east line of said Lot, and lying
southerly of a line 935.0 feet nc
of, measured at right angles to
parallel with the south line of �
and lying northerly of a line 32
northerly of, measured at right
to and parallel with the south l
said Lo�.
Pazcel II:
Lot 4, Block 2,
Yorkton Centre Pointe South
the
� fihe
�ofa
red at
the
eriy
l
. Lot,
feet
of
� r;
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
1VIII�ZO
' October 14,
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admi.nis to
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works D
SUBJECT: Temporary Sign Permit - 7oan Bjorklund
DISCUSSION•
Ms. 7oan Bjorklund who has been conducting Boutique Sales out of her
within the Copperfield neighborhood has arianged to relocate the houtique into �
building. In order to advertise her new location, Ms. Bjorklund feels she needs
signs (see �sign permit attached).
Ethan Allen currently has a temporary canvas siga located over their n
along Trunk Highway 110 announcing that they are still. in operation. Ethan ,
shortly and that sign will be removed. Ms. Bjorklund proposes to replace the
sign with her own similar sign.
Ms'. Bjorklund will need two variances for this sign, one for size and one
Size
The City Zoni.ng Ordinance allows temporary signs to be no greater than 25
feet. This proposed sign is to be 43.3 square feet, thus requiring a 19.7 squ
variance.
Material
The Zoni.ng Ordinance also says that pape'r and similar type banner signs a
prohibited, the Code Enforcement Officers have interpreted this to include
signs. A variance needs to be granted to the type of material for the sign.
The second temporary sign is a small waad one to be installed by the entran
This sign would totally comply with the ordinance and only needs a permit to be in
TheaBjorklund Boutique has been a source of some controversy within the C
neighborhood for sometime and Ms. Bjorklund has been searching for an alternate,
suitable location. She now has an agreement to use the Ethan Allen site and has m�
application for the temporary signs. Unfortunately her application was made too la
placed on the October Planning Commission agenda. Because of the neighborhood
ove� this boutique, staff felt that it would be appropriate to expedite the approval p�
place her application before Council without Planning Commission review.
e located
fihan Allen
temporary
ient sign
will be out
�ge on that
material.
�.�
door.
to be
and
RECOIVIlVIII�TDATION:
Because of the neighborhaod concerns involved with the previous boutique location, I
recommend that Planning Commission review be waived and that Ms. Bjorklund's request for
two sign variances be granted so that she can operate out of the Ethan Allen building beginning
right away this fall. , '
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the recommendation they should pass a motion waiving
Planning Commission review and granting Ms. Bjorklund the following two variances:
1. A 19.6 square foot temporary sign size variance.
2. A sign material variaace allowing the sign placed over the monument sign
lacated along Trunk Highway 110 to be made of canvass.
Council also needs to authorize staff to issue the needed permits for the two signs.
Times fiames for use of the signs are to be November 16, 1994 through November 26,
1994 and March 22, 1995 through April l, 1995.
' � ��:
1
�
; ,
��� �,��
. �
,
{— W�
, �--
S ��\ �-� �' ��' � . e �` .�' �'`� �
J�
s; c�� ���� ��So ad )
� �S� ...I .
� �--� �� t � �c�o=K _v
�.�,e Co.rv� �rn�,�c� �
-� o ,n ��,�� i ��- � a.�
Src�\\ C9..-� �n� s \ ,
; �,�
't �h� s ��-�\c� ' v,s�
a C�o v-rC� V�'�
!�
�� '
�ood �
�--�I 1 . �'iVl�.i'�CE'... �L'�'
O.��Q siZ�! = a9 �h x l�t �S
, I I ��v� 6 �r
� 41m ba���Fr!( prv�,vsi
,
�� �� ����,, ��S �
f
. s`�.. �. c�J i c( dsi'i 11
�
�� si '`�rW i ( ! S�"! ! ( `.
G� �
r � � %C�Ue rn 1� c,�a�� '�
�� �
. � � � � ���
O � ; �u
� ' cL bc�hrt�,
�
�
� � �- � � �;
� ,-ad c.c�. —�. ul,c��°
� n � �n. �
fr� �1
. ��'1-�an �ll�n --
I
S 1'�O�i�V , � C� Y1')
lO�t-� ��
PROPERTY OWNER
� �m C`s.s�t�e
CONTRACTOR
(v � S
rype ar eutldfi p c«,stn,c�ion �
APPLICATION FOR
SIGN PERMIT
CITY OF MENOOTA HEIGHTS
1101 V(CTORIA CURVE
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55118
(612) 452-1850
esl'ec� � �e
��0.� `
.. _
EsUmated Cost , � Contraciors City Lieense No.
�i�d�
Qld � New ❑
Building Permft No.
i� � �
PERMIT FEE
DATE PERMIT NO.
�o1�3Iq�+ �
,,��a���,,,,o�.,,., Lt-S�—
--_,voar,E� �3;c�cK1�r� . S5 a 7
To Be Completed �
- — - -- . = ="�•_
TYPE OF SIGN ��'�`'�' -���d� wau. � aooF ❑ pr,�.iECt'INO C
CthY�`CY`�eC'tlb.\�� , `
GROUNO� MARQUEE C TEMPORARY� OT�+FR' ._. .
�% � sY
MAX. OIMENSION VERTICAL � FT. U iiORQONTAI �O IO F'�',
� N
SIGN AREA SO. FT. NO.OF SIDES S' iSTANCE FROM GROUND TO SIGN BASE �.
HEIGHTaFSIGN �, (�� S �S OI n ��. ��� �-Iien ha.o
� � �� s � �
SETBACK OF SIGN FROM PROPERlY LtNE FT. �
IU.tJMINATED YES O NO � `-., ALIOWABLE SIGN AREA ON PREMISES S�
O�S.�C�OOt' I\Q��rf� �CO'M CJ�+�\��\f�� Ot'�,�
v ��
C,�-enera�ons �out'i�ue�
SKETCH OF SIGN
C�u,�rd� 1e�ker� n�. �-Yhari
U W�tl�h
� s+i �l°,�'er
i .,,,.�. ,.,,�,
e�.�,�� �� ;. �
1 �1�5 �s a.. �. �. �e r�m�'i' � SlG r� �O �. l� {�lt� i1�h2,.`�' ��
�O (�i c) ��e rc�1� �� ��l � C�r�l es� l 9 9`� 5�rr,c,� c�0.�2S o �I�Y1Q.�'.�-�,t�
o.r�d�- t �� U �
fY\ � q q S+� �pr t�� � 1 �� q°I s� .s�- i s ,-�..Q,�1. e�i -1-o shou.) �t,�o,.-'t-
�is evev�� �S -}c�-�� c� �\C�ce G..�- �hiS �000.}ia'1 -1� he\� �F.o�le
�o c�.te. � bv�� \d � � i�r' ca� r�-.� ,
C� r� � _ �
ACKNOWLEDGFMENT AND SIGNATURE: Q U��PG`!�
The undersigned hereby represents upon alf of the penalfies af law, for the purpose of inducing the City o llAen ights t�
the action herein requested, that al! sfaterrrents herein are true and that a!! work herein mentioned wi!! be done in accordar.cc. ,
the or�inances of the City of Mendota Heighfs, the State of Minnesota, and rulings of the Building Department. =
��
� � O f }�`l3,'r�l
C' EO
V
i
;LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY
� October 18, 1994
;
Asphalt Coatractor License
South Suburban Asphalt
Masonry Coatractor License
Darrel Olson Masonry Co.
Schlagel Masonry
i
Excavation Contractor License
Bevlor�Utilities Inc.
Geaeral Coatractors License
CMPA, Inc.
Heartland Industries
,
Gas Piping Contractor License
Air Conditioning Associates Inc.
Cronstroms Heating & A/C
Richfield Plumbing
SVAC Coatractors Licease
Triple D Heating & A/C
Drywall Contractors License
Prestige Drywall, Inc.
r
y
�� t .. . .
. -.,�
4ctober 18, 299¢
TOr lYit9or and City Covnail
<
�
' CLAIiL^a LIST SUMHA2tY:
. ' � ' • . r
:•: .• . TOtdZ. CZEt22r
{;s��.W7F�auiic�i}e���.�}:Fi::i's.•r: ;.} ��t 1 A
•.rf p ��Y.w,�g.� •:1i' s:��3i'iv�"ci�,�::: :>j: :.C��; iiM:i '::�":' �f' :�.'n,:{k�..?i:i:: �I.4 SF3Y
v3;..oyh�?i:'��) ;�� ,y, ,t;4, 43. ,.l�;.� :f • i '�^ :.• ... . .:?,. ,� �
•4.. ,!;;�.; ::F:..; .+. .... ��:r::i•^. .%rr G �.;:ny y>:.,+'F,.k^:"•'M1'�'Ir�, : . Y„> ���`:�:
>?��` �:�,�r%.iK.l,•i?�i(=ti.tui'� � . . �:i . • � ' • . . ,. , . �'' = ' . °' .
. .. . . .. ... �Ni:i � . .
. . . � S1ga�,f.fcartt CZafms ' ' �
_ ."",� .', � . ' Ace Biacl:tap Impravements 1bi118
. ' �;;}`� � , . .• Bituminaus Roadways Sea1 coat
. Vs,��;,�. � • .. ` Callins.Electric repairs 48.258
.. �;: ;�_ . . . ' Hughes & Goste7lo Prosecutions 4,904
.' �as: ' � • ' � • _ • Wiathrap Weinstine Legal 2�716
'`'•;�;- ' . . ' � • 3,516
�:y/� �ty"t
: .. . . . . . . . , , . �� , . , ..... . . . . . ... . . � iii117SQ3.Z QI�L"i � ,
. c'r,� , . " : � .
� PSI Concrete Fire Hal? floors
' �+ ' I 8,Q40
' . .� �� ' "` `s' '� ` -�� ' •:H=�.; :.�: : ,� ;:..,i .
. . ,� . _ , � . :-�,;..
:c..o-.-,��"s;'�;.:,:l+; .w _ . - , . ........ ,.._. ;n:E:�� ... „ . • ;.:��.. ,
i.'!`.:,�.:'`'t' :�f,'i� , ` . ' „ , .. • � ' , . . :r �
, '�.;.;: , � . ... ..,.. _ . .
;:�7r .," t ��v. . .
' '''°r �?:' , �'p�' . ' ' . J' . , " . '
.:q,.. ' . � .. ' • - t • .
. ' ' � ' ' ' , ' '
. . ' . ,.. ' _ �
i.','`l. ''1„%:'�':4 �;'['.n . l y... , . . '; . • :.� • : i •
•~ �� 1 �� �< "t7h,:;l��y:: � y�,.;:••.'• ;:. ..,�.,:+ .;`�. �.r .'L G .•IC•+: . .
a, ry`�y,� �, ,+' :
,4^,�" ��,;�yr.��� ��t-..;'."'' �`�'`�i!"T'y�.'r�•"':�;'r' `c: }-'F �i'• .iY:=c,aN��:: ;�5. 'vai..i"�:1�?�.'r;a; .
� !:;<;:: � ,� �`�d�. �1!;.i:;, r?`
�'"• ' a: :�K,•zV:; ::r��;;z; '+ �s;,. ."�, � ' �-
,�:�w.� �?L.Y�;. + w y :.�y� :�'..'�:'. . �{.;;..4y .
';.`f��. 4..r =:,��� �Wh,+i'�?,�::N>' ,'�t �ty.v1.
: S. '..�: .�.' �'zf,.?.� .'.K,. ' � j:. ; s�.� _' >'1 �.':'.'.�- ': f�.� _ .
tiX:: ::A�3- : �>: �::fl� ::�5`yt: y 1: •`�i : �?:. _'i�::�' •,y .�a �.; � . f
:;'f::"'i:i :::;�4;7.'��'� :t:' �ib i;:.�:'i��� r.',�'� � - ".5 �
ti�t�,S.�'.:'�i`:;Z.'r+'t� L3:!il;:ii.;�'.; '•f?>j �i�'�•~��»�. :i:.,. . .
�� i:J> ,".�,v%'•� �;��,. ,};} �,4'� '•4.:` •�.'�,d.
.v!�. r`Y`' ,'}:, ii;��.�' '�%�¢4;?�"' �;
.���.+,"ti���'w :S: i{.i%';�:2 y'v'{4: .: �r.
�-,{v-., "•I' •`4,.. w.E'_'•�.,:.
~-�r�,. .��r �� p
.:^<?tn�S.. :,i`t ' •?}'~��'.�t.r'�: •'�y: 't..:� - -."4'v'•ta
,`,�'� . bi: ..'r',�.:. �--�: :;':r�� "�=;�,.'F='-
. L:.ii:.' -.i;" '�!' • �
l�'�'•. �,?.� •�".I� "'�i'KK',` r, ii3�,J "�''• :'a:";,. ;:)ri�:.
: �Z��. .::k�� �:.,.,�41 .4•'.f'�iy� • •y� �'i���,y y'7~S� "fj: ;�% :'�•�: ;�X y` ��� � j�' :g�i� ��,N,.. �y.}v'.f (
�. .' �`.,����'s � .�! i���:..:c�K.����^S,'�:,.�:��!�,J%Z�J:lSE;s:i•; %t;� . �r,. .�EGi,,� : 4 , .
i�.`::;. i:Je� :-5:: "'.�:. g� i�.v�����M1`.:.. �K'xrr�iti4. :l n:,. .3 •-.�`3iR"�u:��'--•-
�'�:t:�. �'�-S--I+�i+�'a�+'.Ce.`rn• v.C':3':1:� .- �r}.:r. � t . l � _ . i' �'e'�' _ ti +.}.�F'
�-:3;y s:�Trn:.. .s?.'' �:�s;.. ,ri;ii;^r �.�::.:e`i''+wi;�x.`�+:<�:.t'v''.4:t�,:.�'�q�i� �+.r;� `�e..�.{. �{5:;;+cC-c:+.l� :�."-.:�+ti:+t`:�'.a..,'..<-. x.4�:''L�::i{,h., ....r�S��:i!.awi:.., �'.�.
S.t;�� ....�i.'.. �«-:�p�•.��.: ;.h: - „e'..::{-/i � N..: �S±'-' " V.. '3-+ �f•!.4..nxaY+..+.•�`e.� '4f`�+Y�' . .. ...,+'r�^..�-�.-.�•.. �i1.-.. -'1. '.�r.�"--'I�„-:•....iCa �
. ..r .. ... . . .... �'%]:� :<. ..f:. p..P�;,t'r.�. �-,rMy .i',r� - .v.�.+.:�y.,-�i..,._,,,,,.v,_ ��, 'v...:'w_ �
. ... � . . ��.� r - - . �? . :'`c�. -
. . _ , .... . . .. :i`.*:- `3`.
. . . .. .. : �.. - .. ' "
.. . . �i.+.••<^�[S .
. . .n +z." >'ti:i.:.
. , a, . . .. . _.�c.r
. . . . . ..5�.. �
r . . . . . . . . . r„ . . .. . . �. .. • ... . .. �..r . .• . . . � ..-J:�:' � .• •
- IA Oct i�'
Fri 12:5�
� Temp Check fVumber 1
� Temp.
Check
Number Vendar Name
� 1 Ace Blacktop
1 Ace Ekiacktop
:� _ 2 . __..
7atais Temp Check Rtumber
' Temp Check Number 2
,.� 2 Airsignal Inc
•' 2 Airsignal Inc
._. 4
�• Totais Temp Check Number
1Qr�8f4�lairns List
City af Mendnta Heig�
Account Code
88-4460-828-00
88-4460-822-Q�0
1
01-4�1@-02Qt-2@
01-4210--030-30
2
Dept 10-Adm
20-Palice
3Q-Fire
40-CEO
25-Engr
�
Cornments .
pymt 5 land dawn
pymt 5 arndt
�Ct 5YC
oct sva
Dept 50-Roads
60-Utiiities p�g� �
70-Parks
80-Planning
85-Recyc'i,ng .
90-Animal Control
Arnount
Gi, @58. 95
8, 058. 95
16s 117. 92t
15. ?8
7. 76
r..^- 3. 54
:^
�
�
n
�
��
i�
F�}
:-� Temp Check Number � �
3 Albinsan - 05-43@@-f05-15 splys SQt-84
...� 3 �
80.84
Tatals Temp Check Number 3 •
� iemp Check Numbar 4 �
4 American Business Forms � 01-4300-iftD-i0 peyroil Parms 103.75
� 4 Aroerican Busaness Forms fdi-430@-02@-20 payral2 farms flf.?7 �
4 America» Business Forms 01-k300-040-40 payroll farms 12.@0 ;
� 4 Amer^ican Busine�s Farms �1-4300-0SQs-50 payroil forms 39.90 �
4 American Business Forms 0i-43Qi0-070-?0 payral2 forms 7f.85
4 American Business Forms 35-43Q@-060-60 payrnll forms 12.00
� '4 Rmeriran Busine�s Farms 05-430�-10S-i5 payrn27. farms _k7 90 ' ��
�g 399. 17
� Tatals Temp Clsecic Number � 4 , �
Temp Check Rlumber S •
%? 5 Ameridat� 01-4300-020-20 splys 26.33 �
...� 5 26. 33
- Totals Temp Check Number 5
� .)
Temp Check Number 6 ' +
.) _ C..}
6 Bituroireaus Raadway @1�4423>050-50 94�5eaI caat 48,258.50
..; � 48� 258. 50 U
Tc�tals Temp Gheck Number 6
� Temp Check iVumber • 7 � . •- �
� 7 8 b J Auto Supply 01-4330-440-2@ . parts ,� �9.73
, ���
...� . ' �t
�-ac:,:. - r��y. .r„c:, ,�s:�5rt• � 4x,.: •`•fi.. i',:�'<i+i5ax ::�:-N�,. . d�s8ap..s;>�z+..;r-..��y«.�c,',Tlr:;+w.•:- �r,- i:.t�_ 'r.�-v� �r:u:�i•�'•,.,y- ' -•--�n'''��-;+.�
K::; �.�, :'.'j7., t., .4L :;:i•._ r ..
�:fi:» "'.."' ..a.. •:3::-::;.
,�-i'-i: �.i•f ..�.!:�G.Sc�t v'*�4Y"`.;u..':f'ri .:n-�,h.Hyy 4:�;jr+-i.itr�n�tiiz,'.L'•-.t �i•�:.:r .�V.�. . .. .
:? - ' .�-.7�:+:C§?`r �`'�� ♦ V....�•� �.1'n�?!a ..`L .'i .ti .
tir.i}^J":vY• .:+..n. S�. . . .
- �:11•K�" .
+�.. ::i \ .�,T� A . ^L•�.
.f "37+.ti' "
='}•.. �..w'�r .�'•`. /r...
�`<: . � • .
"^C � ':Ai :� I %\
• 'i... 'H� � I �"'':�:�'
� SC^ .+'�-L :•Y•� '�+{`h•' .y•' .
::�f.. .F. *.s. .n.:r:twd, Ya . , ?i. *.:� . .9 . . r. _ . � .
.yM, ' %ce ;`c'° •: :::., k . : s.-:-: . r��:: . . .. _: :>'a
�.. �rw� •'<':�' : e:` �.yr .y;�; : s :t.� � . . . . -
.d3 . . . . r
#.fti� "�, +'�.
�if"": ....,..y.F.v»: o-.;.: . . . .
- . � -�- �C .a...-e...:d ,z•.: � • . .. . .. . ..
�""';�>:. r.a�. . . . .
�'r .i `:" .! . '-q: t2"� . . . .. . .
�`-ir ..r..;�. `.-s>:':'[`� . .., .
.:,'a:v`.:�i�'.�::a_..''�'._��y:����'Sl-�...F.s _ .-:c��._. �...-.-. .. ._ : ... ....... ... ......... . . .
.�
'- ' 24 Qct i!� Clairns List
Fri 12:58 City of Mendata Heigh�, Page � �';
� Temp Check Ptumbe�^ � �
� Temp. , ' �,i -
Check ,
Number Vendor Narne Accoun� Code Comments �
Amount
'� ? B& J Ruto BupplY 02-4330-490-5Qs
7 B& J Auto Supply 01-4330-490-70 Parts �.�$ �
7 8& J Auto Su 1 parts 7.��
.�+.,,� PP Y-- 15-4332�-49@-6@ part s 7. ?9
'"- 7 B& J Auto 8upp1Y @i-433V1--440-20 parts �
26. 54
...� 35 � ---_..
Tatals Temp Check Number 7 79.56
� . r-y
••� Temp Check Number � � a,,,
8 Hefort Roofing 01-3250 rfd perrn fee �
�) - • 31. 65
8 -----
Totais Temp Check IVumber g 31. f,5 �,y
� Temp Check Atumber g r
-� 9 Bauer Esuilt 01-4330-440-20 parts �
• 9 Bauer Bui2t @1-433@-490-50 �@.47
9 Bauer Built 01-4330-k40-�0 Parts ����� �
� -- Parts 31.3�
. 27 __----
Tata2� Temp Check Number g _ 114.46 {�
� Temp Check Number iq�
'� 10 Riffs Inc 01-42@0-61@-70 oct rent r �
. 340. 27
10 __ �
� Tatals Temp Che�k Number 10 , � a40.2�
Temp Gheck hlumber � i . ' �' �
� 11 Baise Cascade Ofc Products 01-4305-030-3@ chairs
1, 021. 84 �
31 ' -
•� Tatal� Temp Check Number � 11 1,021.84
? Temp Check tVumber 12 . "�
12 Board of �tater Commissianers 15-4425-31Qs-60 ' sept svc `•�
22 Board af Water Cammissioners 02-4425-070-70 �'3-f�
� 12 Baard c+f Water Commissianers 01-k425-07@-7@ sept svc 181.03
12�s�a�cLo.�4later.-Camm•i-ssidners—�8-4428-@@@=Qt sept svc 166.�58 (-�
i� Ba�rd af Water Commissianers 01-4425-315-3Q+ SEPt sve 23.iS
� -- sept svc 78.�6
. �,0 _� �
� . Totals Temp Check Number 1� �' 47c.77
Temp Check Number 13 . ._ �
� 13 Blaeser Landscaping 01-k335-315-30 �
-- re sprinkler system 75.@0 [;1
� ' . , • - -----
• 14 Oct 1° Claims List Page 3 k�
Fri 12:56 City of Mendota Height:
� Temp Check NumGer 13 �i
� 'iemp. ,
Check �
Number Vendor Name Account Code Comrnents Amaunt
'�? 13 75.00 �
Total� Temp Cheak Nurnber 13 . ., �, .
�` Tetnp Check htumber 14 �
•� 14 Border State Ind 01-4330-490-5Q 3amps 336.62
34 Bardet^ State Incf tBi�-4330-490-50 � discaunt 2.57cr - �
... 28 . ' 134.05 �
'Tatais Temp Gheck Nurnber 14
_> Temp Check Numaer 15 �
15 Hurnsville Lumber 05-430�-105-15 laths 123.84
� 25 i23.84 �
Tatals Temp Check Number 15 � • �
-•� iemp Che,�k Nurnber � i6 �
.� 16 Bl�ck Hills Amma 01-4305-02@-�C0 amrna 339_74 �
16 339. 7k
Totals Temp Cheak Number 16
'%'? Q
Temp Check iVurnber 17 � . • • ' _ ,,
� 17 Haland Lawn 5vc 03-4335-315-30 sept svc �C44.95 �
.� 17 244.95
Totals Ternp Cheak Number 17 �
� Temp Check Number 18 + ,
. �
IS Gapita2 Suppiy 01-4330-460-30 parts 14. i2
_ 18 Capitol 5uppl.y 01-4330-490-70 parts 35.76 �
36 � � � . 49. 88
Totals Temp Check IVumber 18
•' �
iemp Check'Numbef f9 �
~ 19 Cellular Onc 01--43@5-020-20 • splys �26.63 ��'-
19 . 26. 63
•• Totais Temp Cherk 1Vumber 19 , :..�
� Temp Check EVumber 20 - , �
.. �1
80 City of St Rau2 01-4330--440-�0 radio mten C2.50
� . � -----
20 22. 50 �..a
Tatais Temp Gheck Number 20 .
'J , 1 ti.+�
:1. .f . +.,I?'�.. ?,•�:;. :i:;!�.. :L�•-e �K. tR ���� —_
: ini �� .-J�:.4..... :;1•.:+
:l"�,t �:7 ...�t' �U�'.� :5+:+'g"/��'? _ _ -.
2 1y� —n..: .�.M4: .
:1 � .`J``.. y " y+.'r.�» _ _
� 1h�.
"? +�i � .t ' �L.•: � .
.,t .:•�.�[ }t :✓5�..:�.� :'. �':.::�:�. . .
..� .}i' s�"-_vy: � ^,�'� f r�t8..i'x , •;•i':.:�.�i;e :�:%: . .
'}t: ,�,,� ''tt- .+F�',�+. y : Y..+. +.�* . t :�tre; }'t}:�:=.'-::.M1 .
.3s. �✓r_ r�xi s -4n. �r:a �w,:. ^.:-c�-_-x '.t"'.'�.,�..�."'.'^;�... ::3.:t r'�. . . .
nL �'�'+S'� S ''`4% .4'%:!� �.+-1^.h.^' :7��. . 4�.� • . .
�S'. .`� .� . �r:.. .. . , . ,
:. -:t: . .
ta. �r - . . _ . . .
�:. �. . . , .
-:+s. :v`�`� >-.>:= . .
- - • :,,.�
' r_ '.�..s-- . .. . .°a � .
.3.� :*.^. . . . � .
�::; ,.ss�..- r . . .
. %:'6�';+i' ;.r . cti .",>•r%:; � .. .. �. . . .
. .,. ..2'.�r�,.�'�,.�., .:_�..s�.: . , _-. . , ., . ,. •i .�..... . . .. .
�`i
: �i
�k a�t ��
Ft^i 12:5,
Temp Check Number
temp.
cr,��k
Number Vendor Name
20
Clairns Lzst
City of Mendota Heigh
Account Code
�
Cornment s
F'age 4
Arnount
Ternp Check Number 21 ("'�
� 21 Callir,� E3ectrical Gonst �1-4�21-300-50 -. .. _ .
21 Callins ElectricaY Const 01-1145 rprs '743.60 �
21 Gallina Electrical Cor�st 09-4490-0@0-00 rP�S �76•g�
21 Gallins E2ectrical Const itD-4490-Qt00-00 ��r� 2,f36.89
2f Gol2in� Electrical Const 01-4330-490-?0 � rprs 1,136.89 (j
21 Callins Electrical Const 01-4330-490-50 rPr� 646.79
rprs , 363.3�
126 ------- �
Totals Temp Check Number 21 • 4,904.4Q1
Ferop Check tVumber 2$ �
�� 22 Commercia3 As hait
P �1-4422-@50-50 tack aiI b3.90 (�
22 ---_-
7atals Temp Check Number �� , 63.90
.� Temp Check Number Z3 �
23 Connec� F»c @1-421tD-030-30 sept svc �
:, , �3 17_86
Totals Temp Chec4t Rumber �3� . r� 17. 86 �i
1
' Temp Check Nurrrber Zq
24 T J Conver�s 01-4305-020-20 splys , �
504. i0
24 _ __ (�
� � Tatals Temp Check tJumber 24 504.70
7emp Check IVumber �g ' � ' • ' �
' 25 Cpverall � 01--4335-315-30 oct svc ��
25 Coverall - 01-4335-31@-50� 137.39
25 Covera2l � oct svc 6����
01-4335-310-70 oct svc 60.00
•• �5 Coveral�l 15-4335-310-60� oct svc �,
1 tIl@ f `59. 99
•' Totals Temp Check Number 25 31�.3$
Temp Check Numbe�^ �6
l:a
26 Caurage Center 02-4305-020-2@ �.�
� -- , �P1Y� �f.09
26 ------
Trat�ls Temp Check Number 25 � �1.09 .. �?
�� Temp Check Nurnber 27 � `
... � ' �..)
- -- - � " �...�
�."_'�'.. . . `."�; ',:.yy,..:c�s`s.'•. .».iti''' rY_<-t�.`+: %!pi:?!�;i,,-'*.i�,x1,r'.'3.'i::.i'i=Jm•;..�it,��.�?:�'',,r'.'��j:.s'.5s�;?;',.,�'i`>''!�,�'.�,.,.>.`,•`.S`�.,'c .",t:
. . .. �Ja .....,. ._.� .... ..... .. �". i°: �: .'�5::'.:s'iiit.Y+�`.':>�::�. ...:
-r
� 14 Oct 1' Cl�ims List Page 5 ' �-
Fri 12:5. CiLy of Mendata Heigh
�� Temp Check Nurnber �7 �
� Temp. ' , .
Check r . �'i
Number Vendor Name Account Code Camments Amount
'^� 27 Dahlgren Shardlow Llban tD1-422f-135-80 sept sva 1,576.53 �
27 Dahlgren Shardlow Uban 01-422QJ-135-80 sept svc 29.3& ,. _, _. t
� 27 Dahigren Shardlow Uban tD1-2125 sept re mathern escraw �_^ 80.00 �
81 1,685.91
: 7otals Temp Check Number 27 �
Temp Check IVumber 28
28 Danka Emgcy Eq 02-�r305-030--30 sp2ys � 17.57 `�
28 Danko Emgcy Eq 01-4305-03rb-30 splys . 261.00
28 1?anka Emgcy Eq 01-4305-020-20 , splys 67.5@
`�� 28 Dan}co Emgcy Eq mi-4305-030-3tB sp2ys 28.04t �
� 112 � 374.07
Tc;tals 7'emp Check Number 28 �i
Temp Check Number 29 �
�
29 Danner Landscaping 01-4308-@70-7@ sod B.SE
� �g 8. 5� �
Tata2.s Temp Check Number 2'3 �
..�
�- Temp Check Number 30 �
i
4.� 30 Chris Doyle C9-4460-834-�i0 dmg re ivy falls �@0_@0 �
30 200. 7J0
r-i
Tat�ls Temp Check IVumber 30� • ��
Temp Gheck Rlurnber 32 .
� 31' Electra Watchman 01-4335-310-50 3rd qtr 88.40 �
` 31 Eleetra Watchroan 0f-�4335-310-70 3rct qtr 88.40
ti..} 31 ESectro Watchman 15-4335-310-60 3rd qtr 88.39
. - ______ (..)
93 265. f 9
.y� Tatals Temp Cfieak iVumber 31 ,
. (')
Temp Ehecic lVuriabe�^ 3^c
,' 32 Globe F'ublishing 01-4300-020-20 splys 6.-_4.5 �+���—
- 32 Calabe Pub1,i,�hir�g 01^-430Q�-020-20 splys _ 53.90
.-'• 64 � 70. 35 �
Totals TemQ Check IVum6er }3� '
� Temp Check Number . 33 , . �
� 33 Gaodyear Service Store 01-4330-440-20 �, tire k78.CS �
—} ' �1
.:'ti.'�c's.. '?:�i�%`$:n::? .8.'Yt�.;t� .t' ...!' ^�� >};..:�. .��•:.._ • .. s:�..' - z.. ry.:wc' ».-y:-:
.�i' t��t�: - ..c'' -J..< _ <i:.„., ,��..,+� �::;q.'x'.-..;_M;,;, >J.-u:ar� _ V,,...-i;c'=—;;,2. .:;.a--,ti+;�-�-•;,-�•-�'�":----+^-.—=
-•.3- �`-"'' :,�!it.�:c... ..�'ti,:-%!t'�.:.�,=.'s �?H-� h .
� t� : r,': =r :+-�- e=:'`��:
+":." .t;r°�:::::.:,.:%�:j::5a:c':=:.-:::t ... ��.:z�• ".3,. .,�-?:+-^+...'c^';'�'a'a: .'_"..^s':�r� a..
.R�•. .:... �,r'+a �'§'s..a`'';.M` ..r"..i:..�:�..r":�"% S3:+wn�•,:''-•�`-' . 1v:.� -r`.'L-�4.. :��t.�k�h'e_.s tt++a+':'::*.�!"i'i=. s
- •Z-ti. ��`�. �: ..r*4.c,,...s:n. �.- .� .-:a:, .'.3_.z.;�::..-- ;a.�:�.,r2-=:.�a;; .�.��:.,•_ .•:..�-� .
rt.`. �. .�u .vr �..,,-�--.-,w-••-�--- - . �s:' _ .. �'• ... .s.. . . , .
�:%:-.,t2. •: �.: . ; •: r • . �. .. . .
- ,/.��..' :.�• .
r�l`+xi . .. . . _ .
..ill..Y+. . ,'e7 4;rn . . , , ,
.�y� G '
•`a`N.
+:�v.3.'_f.. ..'}• . .... . . �.
x, . . . . � _ .
�� .. . . _. . . . . . . .. . .� . .
_.....-�.-:.•:,•.x: = t. . .. . . . . � . .
..s , . _ , ,
� . �. ..>.� , , . . .
. . . �����` � - • - .
. . � . , . .s.,,�... ,.
'•��} 14 Oct 29 -
Fri 12:55 Claims l.ist {�age 6 �,
Ciby of Mendota Heigh.
� Temp Cheak iVumber 33
� Temp. � -
Ch�ek -
Number Vendor Name Aacount Code Cornments �
Arnaunt
`�� 33 �aadyear Serviee Store 01-4330-440-20 �
tires 239.13 .
66
}� .. Tot�2s Temp Ct�eck Number 33 . - ' .. . ?17.39 � . . �
..•y Temp Check Number 34 . �
34 C�apher State One Call 15-4210-@60-6Q� sept svc `�'
33. 25
34 , _____
Tat�Is Temp Check IVurnber 34 33.25 �
� �� Temp Eheck fUumber 3g
-�• 35 Mdwe Hank 01-4305-03@-3p splys �
35 Hdwe Hank 01-4305-030-30 48.23 Q
. discount 4=53cr
_.? 70 ' -----
• Tatals Ternp Gheck Nurnber 35 k3.70
`� Temp Check Number 3g �
36 K�ith Neaver 35-2125 tf�^ escrow hillside creek 1,950.@0 �
�_ ` 36 ' � --------
Totais 7'emp Check Nurober 36 - 2,550.00 (,j
' '�
••� Temp Check Nurrrber 37
••� 37 Hennepin Technical College @1-4403-030-30 �
-- haz m�t trng 115.5@ �
� �7 ------ �i
� Totais Temp Check Number � 37 ' 115.50 .
Terop Check tVumber �g ' �
' 38 Hughes & Costello 01-4222-12@-20 sept pros r.�
. E, 71 S. 70
38 • , ________
' Tatals Temp Check Number 3g z, 715. 70
r,' �
� Temp Check Number_ 39 .
39 I 0 S 01-4300-110 10 sP Y� �
39 I 0 S 1f5.75 �
-} 39 I CI S �1-4300-03@-30� splys 28.95
01-4300-040-�►0 sp 1 ys 115. 75 („)
39 I 0 S 01-4300-050-8Qt sply5
39 I p S. 01-4300-070-7@ 28.95
�� 39 I 0 S 01-4300-080-8m SPlys 28.95
39 I 0 S 05-4300-105-1'S SPly� 115.75 .. �;1
j . sp2ys 215.80 �
j I
0
♦
�./
� � �"}
'
�Fx�-:ii:::::" '.�''�'.�:nr,.. . _ � '
' j 14 Det f� Clairns �ist P�ge i fi-
'Fri 12n5! City af Mendut� Heigh `
�'� Temp Check {Vumber 39 �
Temp. �
��� Gheck �
Number Vendor Narne Account Code Camrnents Arnount
n 39 I O 8 15-4300-060-60 splys 28.95 �
� �•�� __ _ - _ _ 578.85 - -- - • .�
Totals Temp Check Number 39
,-.� Temp Check Number 40
�
k0 I CMA R12 -4402-110-5 0 pu b 1 53. 45
, pm � 53.45 �
'io�tals Temp Cheek t3umber � 40 •
�' Temp Check Num6rer 41 �
ki Knox Comrnercial Credit 01-43fd5-070-70 splys ?5.91 , �
+� 41 Knax Commercial Credit 08-4335--00�0-00 splys 33.86
42 K»ax Carnmercial Credit @1-4305-070-70 splys 14.4i
.^� ^41 Kr+iox Commercial Credit 01-4305-070-70 splys _61_57 �
164 185.75
..� 7otals Temp Check Number 41 � � �
� Temp Check lVumber 42
� 42 "ihornas Knuth 88-4415-7tB4-00 rni exp 70. i8 �
42 Thomas Knuth 29-44i5-834-00 mi exp 45,98
k2 Tharnas itnuth 88-4415-828-0@ mi exp • 24, 94 �
� 42 7hamas Knuth 1S-4210-050-60 mi exp C0.�1
168 162.11 ' �
7 Totals Temp Check Number 42
� Temp Checic Number 43 .
�
43 Krechs Office Machines 4J1-43@0-030-30 splys 8.30
.,� A3 Krechs Office Maehines 0i-430Q-120-10 " splys 37.52 ' �
g6 45: 82
.� 3ata2s Temp Check Number , 43 u
Temp Chectc Nucebe�r 44 _
..1 44 Leef Hras • 01-k335-31@-5@ sept svc 24.10 �-�
44 �eef Bras � 01-4335�3i0�'T0 -ept-svc , 24.10
�r►"Lee ras 15-4335-310-60 aept svc 24.10 �.�
::� --- ,..__-_
132 • 72. 30
� Totals Temp Check Number 44 . . �
Temp Check Rfumber - 48
� h5 Liilie Suburban News iDi-k240-080-8fA hrg not 26.25 {•-�
� � , �''f
- "?'t' . ti t� ;tt. :rT�"' .+-.; �:,n.w.r :•:w . ti;; T:. �y i,., �� : ��r.::::'• t.;«=;'•;vi .—
1� .' .�.���.'',��"'���.���"^ ,y5`ry:`.%" :';T' ".%':�^�-'a=''i
!'�''i�. .�!S ...i�-w:=i�. .R' •'"i'v.�.::' ^3;%� �..,*"
?�, , i ; .�;�-R �' S' : .(. -i'�:.i.{ .
`Y,. .T' r� �'�vcNi+�Ki'tt! 'M'2:'l�:�. e.
�N. ...�1t�. � E "3:. . h. �'^t�'�'I:��%:•:%: v4 •
'�n. . \ .'i'' '1'r 'wk+ . '
� . .
•�H
� ..}: ti'� . :.4�'L?:� .
.�� � ��.�µ•.�:..< Y _?:.�. � . . .
r f
.1 �::': t�—^+t . .., .
L : J' � ,
^-.:.:k' f— �+-�r.r�-�--'L�. . .
�:%9.:. .�' '•C . .. ,
5 ��'�:.::Ff«•�ti . . . .
':<'%' . �4?� :t�3t+'it . ' �":�.��...vs,..�.�. :.. . . ..
ir^ ..s;��n•?;:�.�� ':e:C�... - `$`� •-i..'+•.."� ::•:�.=�`..`�a .s, . .. ., . . . . , .. '+".v%:' . . �
%;,. �' : . ' �' � •:: ",;.. . .
,. " .
`y,. • .:
. .. :
.
f.Y ':�.. . .�,.�t.x:: •- '�^. '�y,"+i .,.:jf� � ' +�rrr'.i :; '..�, .. . -'d;e:^'^';' . . . .
,� ,
� . . v. .. .
� .
.—..!...+'.�:_ r"' ..__' _n.��.'.'_Lr.��.e'.��'J.=1�.+•i:.4��'^' �-r- . .. :^��Ma+C;:: , . .
'l'a-k:.%r3:�.�"G:c:ll}��ww�+..�w^i!m_'f . '�"4. 7�, "'a�_!._ .
' 24 Oct iS Claims List
Fri 12:5� ' City of Mendota Heigh� ��9e a t^;
�� Temp.Check Number 45
� '� Temp: � ' Q
Check
Number Vendor IVame Account Code Camment� �
Arnount
.. � 48
7ata1� Temp Check Nurnber 45 � 26.25 �j
�' Temp Cheak Number � 46 - - - ._ _ _ . _ . . .. �. . _ .. _
�
, 46 Mc Nam�ra Contracting Q►1-4422-@50-50 hat mix ������
46 h1c Nam�ra Corttractin4 15-43�Q�-�►90-60 hot mix 326.20 �
92 ----_�.
Totals Terrtp Check Number 46 � 552.^c9
, Temp Ch�ck Number 47 �
47 Menards 01-4305-050-50 splys 59.�7 �
-� 47 Menards 01-4330-490-�0 SQ�xs 3�_$�
94 ------ i:3
"}
Tatals Ternp Check Nurnber p7 90.1?
' Temp Check iVumber^ 48 Q
� 48 Mendota Heights Rubbish! 01-4280-31@-50
48 Mefldota Heights Rubbish° 01-428@-31@-70 sept svc 65.65 Q
48 Mendo�a Heights Rubbish' 3S-.q2g0_31�_6� sep$ svc 65.65
� 48 Mendota Hefghts Rubbish+ 0�_42g@_315�.�0 sept svc 65.63
_ , sept svc 43.12 (,�
192 ----_... �
� 7otals Temp Check Nurnber 4g 8k0.05
• Temp Check Number �` 49 �}
,
49 Metra Waste Gontral 15-�►448-060-60 sept sac ehgs 4 000.00 �
� 49 Mebro Waste Contral 15-3615 sept sac chgs '
40.00cr
98 -------- �
.} Tota2s Temp Check Number 49 3,96@.0�
iemp Check Number �m [;)
' ' S0 Midwest F��ata Svc 01-4305-020-�fD sept svc
50 90. 88 (,,,,}
' Tatals Temp Check Number g0 50.88
:.?
Temp Check iVnrnber� 51 �
51 M P G 01-430Qt-020-�^@ t•..)
S1 M P fis bus cards pd 267.32
's� --- 01-430@-020-20 , discount 5.0�cr
102 � ' ------ . �}
Totals Temp Check Numbe�^ �� , 262.30
� � , �
.r,a,'•:.y�: . ,;t .piy ��.�.. , �
l.;,i
,. _ -r. •,� ••�
::�;n.�n.?;:, _ . �.s�:... .,r� f ...�._t.
, „ .. .,;,,;: , ,...,..K . .:... .
.-•. , . ., ,-.•-. �>.. .,.w .., � ,:., : ..
. . . . .._:.-:.... .:_<' . .. ,.. .,.. . .,
.
; .,
.,.
�«..'.'r:^*�+( ' _ �.-:�-,:.:.t,t+i.t.�" .s- °' ''t;:�+:"+,.:-..�.,. '�:. •- -�.�..._y-'� °?r++%�s�Fr;a?t.?^„�T'�'1"r,... ' � ;r:3y'�'�+^'� �ri;�K e r''� :pi:a::� t:.:: . .. a; ,�c
, .. . . .-'e�-�LS'^.T'.�r��...a..;e�ro . ..w � . rv.-.--.:,-T.a:i.e-o+r-.-i?•..-.,a,�., ••-:.:.-. ..�; } a- : - -.-�Fh*-. �,�'ti,i-t'c:. ry«1r�c .-', j .4. r`:_ p•.`�i;.:�., �;•-=..: �i , 1.. ,..y. •- r .>. - � . c7a; .tir,>
.. . . _ , ... _ ;�r=:�;o-L,r-.�_-.-.;,.,.. . �y�t;� `i .;3(YS: 9 .;:5:� >`r' ""-�� i�dv ..:+k rt..,,; . X'i:`+'3Gi:•..'n c.:`� :•a f �+ �
: . . . . r � .. . .. . . • .?i •�t- ..��:. . 7 Y.:�%,y}.F_;_",:iY,.. �Y�''Y'.� .+' i: 5�•� ...
. . . .. . ... .. .. .. �. . . .. ., � i :.Y :ft':'.i3:5•.p'' .'�ft:= ....°'x, n:: . . >`,a,,.. �,... , ., , .,. . ..
14 Oct 1' Claims List � P'age 9 �
Fri 12:5� City of Mendota Heigh. '
�•�•� Temp Check Number 52 _ �
.
.� Temp. �
Gheck
Number Vendar Name Aacount Code Camments • Arnaunt
' 52 Minnesota �love Inc 01-4305-050-5@ glaves 79.20 �
52 Minnesota Glove Tnc 01-4308-07GJ-70 _ _ glayes . 4 , 79.2Q� ,� ._ ..
�t _52 Mirrnesota Glave Ir�c 25-4305-id60-60 gloves _79.20 �
156 ' c�37. 60
. 7at�ls Ternp Check Nurnber 5� . �
Temp Check Number 53
53 Minrv Dept af Revenue 01-4300-ii0-l0 3rd qtr sales t�x ret�irn 24.02+ `�
53 Minn Aept af Revenue fbi-3306 3rd qtr sale� tax returr� 21.00
` itd6 45.0tD �
Total,s Temp Check Nurnber 53
� Temp Gheck Number 54 �
..> 54 Minne�ata Teamsters Lac 320 01-20?S oct dues 273i@@ �
54 273. 00
..� Totals Temp Check IVumber 54 �
Temp Cherk Number 55
>�' SS Minn 5tate F C Assn 01-4403-@30-3Q � certi€icatian fee - 35.00 �
-- - ----- `
55 ' 35. Q�0
�� Tatals Terop Check Number �5 � Q
_ Temp Check Nurnber 56 � �
56 Minnesota iaro inc 02-4330-490-70 • sept parts etc 698.84
� 56 698.84 �
Tatals 3emp Check Number 56 . -
• Temp Check Number S'7 . �
57 Mfnnesota Conway @1-4335-315-30 annl insp 194,30
.. � -- ------ t..)
57 ' � 194.30
Totals Temp Check Number 57
.� ,.•�
3emp Checic NumDer 58
•• 58 Motor part5 Service 01-4330-490-50 parts 2@.�4 �
58 20. 2k
� Total� Temp Check Number 5B , •- �
' � Temp Check hiumber 59 � �
59 Natl Fire Pratection � 01-440�-030-30 ec�de updete A4.15
> _
�} � ��
;sy�...<a, r..-�.-e.n "�1• '2.; ' ' ^,..u:.�.x;? .0 ,:�+�::::i,=;:�.:..,e�;,.:+�,-;,s.�r.:e.;�i=`��'"` '^—=-�-.'C:\�_4•�,-... -r�,^';T-•-;-:...
- _ x. ,: ...-'i�=. `�'�-�. r ::'r-'.i:: '�i_"s-' ..r=tt.ns:'-�.;.�:';::.`". c{ "t: �S':-��. .. .
+i. i;. - - ,-r;,• _ ,
1Y .
''�i ;:Y:m:::4.=Yani:�
'+.{.. f �-•� '
`Cw� '-\'� - ' .
� fi . r
yy:^,:� �";:j:'��, :..�`• .
�.. _ . .
£•+ . .
�'-r .2-�i: a.. �Yv. .
:+1. ?: �'r.
;:,;.�'ie.. .� �i . . -
�, , . . , .
. �Y - .
� � / . .
•� . .
'� 't. / .. . . . .r .
'+`Gi h . . .� n
�" . . . .
..��� . . ., i . . .
. `s v�.' . . . . . . .
`.�=i. . .. . . t, �:� �:�'. :
_+�7: . . . . . .
�" , w . Y . ... .. ..... . .
..'.^,..a :S:t 4.. �.. : -,.f....�'i.� . . . . . .l.:c., . , . . . .
. �i . .
' •} 14 Oct 34
Fri 12:56 ,
� , Temp Check tVumber
� Ternp.
Check
Number Vendor Name
E-3=3
0
Claims List
City af Mendota Heighti
Account Code
Camments
Page 10
Amount
4�
�
�
� -- ----- . �
59 k4. f.5 . „ .
� 7ot�ls Temp Check 3Uumher�- � 59 " . �
Temp Check Nurnber 6@ '
�} 6L� Ne2san Radia Cararn Qs7-4330-000-0Q+ oct mtcn 62.40 �
..� 60 , 62.40 �
Tatal� Temp Gheeic Nurnber 50
_ Temp Check Number 61 �
._ ti �
61 3ohn Neska 15-441@-060-6@ exp reimb 123.36
:� 61 223.3£s �
Totals 7emp Check IVumber 61 •
� Temp Check Nurttber 5� , "�
� 62 Narth 5tar Gancrete Ca 15-4330-490-6@ parts 80.99 �
62 80.99
� Totals Temp Check Number 62 �
)
Ter�zp Cheek Number b3 =
� 63 Northern 01-4305-070-7@ splys 94.45 �
63 94.45
� Tot�lz Temp Check Nurnber 63 �-�
� Temp Check Number ' 64 � . , �
�
64 Northern Air Carp 08-4335-@00-@Q� - rprs 90.00
-' 64 90. @0 ''..�
Toials Temp Check Number fi4 �
•� Temp Check Nurnber 6S , s-��
x •
.� 65 OfFice Max 01-4300-07@-70 splys 44.54
65 Office Max 01-4300-070-70 ch�irs 343.4� �•�
130 388. 03
J Total� Ternp Check Nurnber 65 . {••��
Temp Checic Number 66
� , . .. �;:i
� 66 Oxygen Service Ca 01-4305-03@-30 • oxy 25.24 �
� � ' �.,�
.� ` �..J
�.5�' �:'�: ,i.,�.. '$3�:^ .k 'f, ,C_..i..�,.;�,.,v, �.r•, ti.'�:4` Y•• -':ss` r�
s-�.+c:. S - _
,u � i. .e. ' `K
'"'�..-:.i � '
' n.r�:%;:r M'. 'i�ww:.. : ,sf•' �S . �`�4,. .
.i%ti:j» �.-a.�::'te^+ � �.T i .3�..^r
�'�,:-��F'�ri � nY.
�t�f%t�:i% a.•..:". S . � � .-.a ..:.:.+::,i:::� ::-..�.C..+.:,�,.a:;:.;.-.usti:p.;,tny^.••'?bt2^' ''.+`• r�t'QC.:, .
�%ff+' -4^u.^'";s'":+-i:: 1+y :"ttf :'Y:.!. .+..Y ::✓'N•��e.��..;;�, : 4 _ >-. � :x:.t.:�.�:-,Y"' .
"t'^'•^ �.»:.:=T`--=:r..:-Fe.i=� `L .eth�:t'N.� ''.< .�.. ..9�^', " .
.. $ ....•-a=.-.-..+:. s-- •'r� �e� P.._ .'#'� �j;`'2 �. .4- ..�.''�.'..: �? �`:
_ �'�;^" •j;..7#.'�.: t� .r ...ra . _ �:5?:>,c�;' • 8g,._r�...:.. . .
—�:,..� :�2%• . . ;-:?^?#' . ��s.. . -.¢.,-��:.%..'.
.ds:.. , .s:"•,3."'i•""., ., � ...t..; :..^..•.= . . . . . .. , .
.. , f,�Y r: :5�'n.1. y` •T . �: t�v=' � • . � . � -'!. . . .' }�'� �- . . I . . �: '4�.. .S.v. C
. . . , . .. ,. . . .. . . . , . . . . . . . . . .. , , .,�.<.. -.,.,..,.wh�>. i: c �.`,%tsc o ., i. _.. , . . . s . . .c'r .
14 Oct 19 Claims List Page 11 �
Fri 12:56 City af Mendota Height �
� Temp Check Number 66 �
..� Temp. .
Check �
Number Vendor Name Acaount Code Comrnents Arnaur�t
� 65 Oxygen Service Ca QS-430S-020-20 oxy 25.24 �
66 Oxygen Service Ca @8-4335-@00-1�0 act thru 9/30 18. @0 , _.__., _
� �66 Oxyge» Service Co � 01-4305-03fl-�@ - aet thru 9ts01 23_50 �
264 _ 81.98
Tat�la Temp Check tJurnber 66 �
Temp Check Number 67
` 57 P& H Whse Qti-4330-490-5Q� ' parts i46.4{s �
..� 67 - 146.46 t..}
Sotals Temp Cheek Numbe�^ 67 •
� Temp Check Nurnber 68 �
68 Paifus Impl 01-43@5-@7Q�-7@ parts 6.95
.i 6g . � � 5.95 �
Totals Temp Check iVumber 68
� Temp Gheck Number 69 �
� 69 D S I Concrete 01-4620-030-30 re fire hall floor surfac 8,440_00 � �
6`� ' 8, 44P. 00 i
� Totals Temp Check Number 69 �
Temp Gheck Nurnber 7+h
� 70 Public 8afety Eq Ga 01-4330-440-20 rprs 9@.@0 �
� 70 . 9@. @0 ,
Tatals Temp Check Num6er 70 '�
' Temp Check Number 71 � �
72 Public Empl Ret Assn 01-2tA7k oct prem - 72�Q+0
; 71 Public Empl Ret Assn 01-4131-110-iQ1 oct prern � 9.00
71 Public Empl Ret Assn 01-4131-050-50 oct prern 12.00 . �
7i Public�Empl Ret Assn 01-4i31-0�C0-20 oct p�^em 22.00
� 264 105.00. ��
Tot_al,s.serap_Check-Number 71 _ •
� Temp Check Number 72 �.i
3 72 S E Fi 01-4220-@50-5@ aug svc rosa cauni 7�4.44
__---- �- Q
�'2 774. 44
Totals Temp Check Number 72 � �
� ' . �..)
� , . �._ 1
- '�': ry�t}v Y� M Y. .� ✓ !^'e':. a.t�ry .. _i,+' �.:i;:� .�1�: ,+,=a., :.i:??�fC.":��:�'n:'+.'�.;_.'i:;i:, j \ K
K'C-s t -: h�.: L• i:J:-.' Y+ i: �•
:�1'-i .:.y:: ..:i:• .,s .
l+uJ-:� �'
.'.~5.4y' .ii� �.i..nl�f�..4y'n'SY'y9��": • \i'. 1 . ✓. .
a.ty'':3F' . +3'.s"' �ry..�'°:t :'F+`w?'n '�t:"i�• ., .
�~5:ti':ti.- `'Y'.�, . . __. . �+--rir+::..:-± .2�9 C. '��':,. . . .
- a... ✓.`+4F«�i.�Y '�';�v�+�`- .i_4-%-�w•�'•h ,
'M1+�1! � �;Y�:.� w.w.+-M� . . r . '( � . � . . . .
s['��w�ww;r Yi.'4f.�1:3'�Ci �'.��.� � }751� pr '�T^�.+_•.-�:+:f[':'� � 'rt�^^�•� - . . . . . a ♦ • - .. � . N'"{/.'I'~�� . n . .. , . . .. . .
-�..;.. . _ . . . �';SAh j. : ,«��...� : ..; �]�: i :iF�;N1'_�+ti] .•.-".'!"; . . . . , . . .. , . . . . w . �
�.
• 14 Oct 1"�'. � Claims List Page 12 C�
Fri 12:56 ►-�•� City of Mendota Heights
} Temp Check Nurnber 73 �
.� Temp. .
Check �
Number Vendor Name Account Code Cc,mrnents Arnount
1 73 Spectrum Business Systems i5-433Qt-490-60 rprs 60.00 �
;� 73 _ _ _ . - . - _ . _ - - 60. 00' .... w . ,. . _ _ -
} Tot�l� Temp Check Nurnber 73 �
Temp Check Number 74 �
i4 State Treasurer 01-3315 3rd qtr 5/chgs 3,977.90
. 74 State Tre�surer 1$-3315 3rd qtr slchgs 9.50 �..}
74 State 7rease.trer tDi-3615 3rd gtr �/etsgs - i59.5Q�er
222 3, 8C7. 9Qt
' _ iotals Terop Gheck ititurnber 74 �
_� Temp Check Nurnber 75
�
75 Tapco 01-4420--@5@-50 signs 186.39
� 75 � f 8b. 39 �
Taials Temp Check Number 75
� 7emp Check Rlurntaer 76 . Q
� 76 7 i E Cammunicatians @1-433QJ-440-�0 rprs 152.51 �
75 152. 51 l
.y Total� Temp Check Number 76 • �
Temp C3�eclt l�Iumber 77 �
•'• 77 Tracy Tripp Fuels @1-1210 nl fuel 3,180.@0 �
� 77 � 3, 180. @0
Totals Temp Check IVumber - 77 � �
� Temp Check Nurnber 78
�
?8 IInited Electric �o �� 01-4305-03@-30 splys T6:68
' 78 76.68 ��
Tatais Temp Ct}eek Number 78 '
' Temp Check Number 79 �
'79 Vision Energy 01-4422--050-50 propane 38_85 �
7'9 38. 8S
., Totals Temp Cheeit Number 79 ,
, ._ �"�«�'
Temp Ghecic Narnber 80 • '
r 80 Russell Wahl @1-449@-070-70 / re banfire 350,00 � �
) * + �?
.. .i:. ' � - . - . _ ,:i�. :i. f `3N:{. ' :'t.0 '.A � AM2 S .�M+.:.,�. _ _ '
.�Ys.,.�..i. X'i:+�,�+�'S`��':-. +:d6s�..`-.4`��':�++"p'f""=�.i :4?!1%J!wM� .+�s -T.�-:
:4'� � .k" . w.µsr.�. .�3
-s�.--ffi�S{.�cc�-.S4S"-M��' ,.�'i' '1
' ,w." i'�: ' _:+.. � �.ife ..� s �s ., o
`:xx rrt:" ..5� � � . . :.!.,�i �. �':... e .C'r' � .t-:'s'i�:!"*' . . "5':.:;:��:" t .
•'�.:P:z�`.»Yn'i�:+'w•'+yM' a.�'.r..hM.r.%l�ti`d?'C ..�f. .'K..... l:.rr-,^K:�..._n6y7+.�.-i^.'.<�w.r.+�+!.-.t .'.�°';;�"...... .;��;.:t•;7•l;?•}!•a.� .1..�.�.:..t.;r,`_.i.•,.ri'� v: . .., n ...... . ...,.c. . . .
_a+�-'�.:n'd.:.»:•;..�+-+we�.�.-�+...-.- zsS..;-a�.:F....��=�r.+... . . � _t.(<.�. . ".�� . . ...«"C.:: ... ^ `'A'' •
�.,.,j,-_-- . . . � . . . . „ . . . . . : , . . , . , w � . . . '
' 14 C1ct 19.
Fri 12:58 �t*t
'� Temp Check Nurnber 8@
Temp. -
' Check
Number Vendor Name
� 80
Tot�ls Temp Check Number
� Temp Check Number 81
8i WaII 5treet Jaurna2
81
iota2s Tecap Check Nurnber
Temp Check Nurnber 82
• 8� Winthrop & Weinstine
82 Winthrap � Weinst9,ne
.� 82 Wi»thrap & Weinstir�e
• 8� Wznthrop & Weinstine
.� 328 �
Tatals Temp Gheck hlumher
� ---- •
6053 •
..� Grand Total
�
.)
;
�
Clairns List
City aP Mendota Heights
Account Code
80
01-44Q+2-22@-I@
$i
@f-4221-120-10
16--4220--120-00
16-4220-120-0�
tdi-422Qt-120-80
82
Cornment s
renewal
aug svc
aug narthland
aug bds
�ug pente?
MANliAL CHECKS:
14931 ' 42.Ob K b M Catering
14932 4,092,68 Deputy Registrar
14933 � 576.88 U S Past Office
14934 3,274.08 State•Capital C U
14935 37.28 Mtnn Baokstore
14936• 10,621..75� Gras'smafi Ghec
14937 8,856.i9 Pera•
14938 53.84 "
14939 788.04 M'31�n��Muival
14940: 405.00 Mirin.State Retirement
14941 750.82 ICMA RT
14942 256.80 Dakota Connty.
I4943 50.00 Federal.Reserve Bank
14944 555.00 Dakota County Bank•
14945 . 3,595.75 Ct�i.ssioner Revenue
14946 15,819.33. Dakata County Sank.�
14947 46,948.75 payroll'a/c .
14948 .. .69.OQ. Kahter �ttatei
14949 500.00 City St Louis Park
14950 916.48 Payroll a/c
14951 � �.5;04—Narth�StarmCtiap ICBQ�
Page 13
Arnaunt
350. Q10
t
149. @0
149.@@
,�,r0t►. 40
1 I4. 0Q�
297. 94
2� 601. '�c�t
3, 517. 58
� P D meeting 111, e�'.65
tabx & excise tax pw vehicles
3rd qtr sewer pastage
9/3U payroll
P a supplies
- CE4 vehic]e
9/30 Qayrokl
�
��
n
��
�.
��
��
N y
��
regr Neska
municipals banquet
special payroll
• 97,794.69 C,,�
. G.T. 209,628.34• .
. - .. �1
. • (,.J
� ' .
. ���
' _ .:s"ri`.y;.''��`-,'_z'f^`�-',:��.'�+'•�'ba.tv`.�".+..�'`.:�E€.:..�.i;�:.:+u:.�.ri.-.-•. - --- --'--�'s�c� ' .. • '.'.ic%ir`::..a„�'..i>"+'�'r'^" .-'n!:,t,---�^r^—"'•,-: � • . . ' . � • • " .. - . , . ' .
�' '<�..���4�� . •,r.. . �'--�--jr^;, . :�-"-.T''.::a"•9�.-:..a,-if�-;a**�-.--�+-+�+*.-.-+-^.*o'„--T�.,Y':;_'-- . . . . .
�'--.�."ti1"3`s'-e-..,-?.*.Rt.-Y:_rs;Z,•,,ti�.._�,.�,`.�c:.�...l.: . � • .. . . . ' ,.. . . , . „ . .. . : . .. 'j' . . .. - `� . ._ . . .
October 14, 1994
�
F
,
i
TO:
FROM: ,
Mendota Heights Police Department
MEMORANDUM
Mayor and City Council ,.
City Adminisirator, Tom
Police Chief, Dennis Delmont � �
SUBJECT: Mobile Data Terminals
�
Discussion I
;
We were very pleased to learn that our used 1992 squad cars sold for $4,665.00 and
the auction. This was considerably more than we anticipated. In addition, General Mc�
line on the pricing of the 1994 squads. As a result, we have $1,764.00 left in capitol c�
buying and equipping the two new squads. When the proceeds from the auction is ac
up with a total of $11,594.00 in "surplus".
I
I am requesting that we use a portion of this money to purchase a mobile data termina
existing squads for approximately $5,000.00. This will put us a year ahead of sched
attempt to� equip all four marked squads within four years.
,
. ,\
With the addition of South St. Paul police and fire to our radio system, the MDT's ar�
important�than ever. West St. Paul and South S� Paul both use the terminals to cut b
traffic, and leave our channel clear for emergencies. It apgears now that we have the
opportunity, and we would very much like to take advantage of our "windfall".
;
Action Required
If Council+ agrees, it should authorize the City Administrator to approve the necessary
orders (not to exceed $5,000) to buy, program and install a second MDT in a Mendot
Squad car
+
a
165.(?0 at
�s held the
ay after
i, we end
for our
.e in our
more
ck on radio
eed and the
Heights
,
i
i
f
I
TO: j
FROM: :
,
SIIBJECT:
CITY OF MENDOTA BEIGHTS
�� •
October 13, 199�
Mayor and City Council
Tom Lawell, City Administ
Proclamation Regarding Violence Prevention
DISCIISSION
t
i
Attached please find a copy of a letter from Dakot�
Commissioner Patrice Bataglia, Chair of the Dakota Counc
Healthy Communities. In her letter she describes an in�
of the�Dakota Council for Healthy Communities known as '
the Violence", and requests that the City of Mendota He�
with the State, County and other Dakota County municipa]
proclaiming October 23-30, 1994 as Violence-Free Week ar
27, 1994 as Turn Off the Violence Day.
A�draft Proclamation is attached for City Council
consideration.
ACTION REQIIIRSD
�
Council should consider adoption of the attached dc
which proclaims the week of October 23-30, 1994 as Viole
Week and October 27, 1994 as Turn Off the Violence Day �n
City of Mendota Heights.
�
t
;
County
Ll for
:iative
Curn Off
�hts j oin
Lties in
i October
zce-Free
ithin the
r
CITY OF MENDOTA HLIGHTS
DAROTA COIINTY, MINNESOTA
PROCL�TION ACI�OqPLSDGING OCTOBER 23-30, 1994 AS VIOLENCi3-FREL
• WEER AND OCTOB}3R 27, 1994 AS TURN OFF THE VIOLENC}3 DAY
�JSEREAS, the citizens of Dakota County recognize that violence
is an•issue that affects their daily habits, their youth and
families and their overall quality of life in neighborhoods,
communities, schools and workplaces; and
WHEREAS, it �.s believed that people of all ages have the power
and responsibility to help reverse the growing threat of violence
by educating themselves about healthy ways of resolving conflicts
and responding to anger; and �
WHEREAS, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners has
identified violence prevention as a significant public policy issue
through the recommendations of its Human Service Advisory
Committee, presented in the Prevention and Early Intervention
Report, (Dakota County Resolution No. 93-757 dated September 21,
1993); and
�SEREAS, the Governor of Minnesota has proclaimed the week of
October 23-29, 1994 as Violence-Free Week in Minnesota and a
grassroots citizens coalition has established October 27, 1994 as
Turn Off the Violence Day; and
�PHEREAS, the Dakota Council for Healthy Communities is
planning public and community awareness campaigns for Violence-Free
Week, October 23-29 and Turn Off the Violence Day, October 27,
1994; and
4PHBRE�AS, Dakota Council for Healthy Communities is requesting
the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights to proclaim thia
week and day in order to give visibility and support to violence
prevention efforts on a countywide and community basis.
NO�P, THERLFORE, B8 IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Mendota Heights hereby proclaims the week of October 23-30,
1994, as Violence-Free Week and October 27, 1994 as Turn Off the
Violence Day in Mendota Heights; and
BE IT FIIRTHER RLSOLVED, that the Mendota Heights City Council
encourages citizens to begin using their individual power and
responsibility to examine ways that conflicts can be resolved
positively and constructively without violent words or actions and
to choose to turn off violent television programs and music, and
not to go to or use violent movies and videos; and
� i
I
�
i
i
1
BE IT FIIRTH$R RESOLVED, that the Mendota Heights City Council
commends the many individuals and organizations throughout the
County who are actively involved in violence prevention efforts and
encourages them to promote and sustain these community prevention
efforts. I
Proclaimed by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights
� this 18�, day of October, 1994. I
,
�
f
i
�
�
r
' ATTEST : '
i
2
a
Kathleen M. Swar�son
City Clerk
�
r
i
By
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA
Charles E. Mertensot
Mayor
. . , , �, ;^• _ ,.
I
I
' I
I
l
. �
. �: fi: ' :%M',:
;?; ;;;i:' ;,:i :.2.. ,. .. . . • . . �ie•.
.. . . • . . • • . ' • .. • � �
iolence is . . .
r;
�olence is . . . �
actions and words that hud
people. It is any action that is an
abuse of power and where the
intent is to control by causing
pain, fear, or hurt.
Verbal violence is . . . "
, using words to humiliate or
.. . _ - �intimidate a person.
. " " � . �ci" •
� • � . .. . .. •,.th;e, . , „ . . . '+ . , .. ..
Physical violence is . . . " �
hurting a person's body or the
things a persott cares about.
.. ;:a;�."
' �' Sezual violence is . : . � - � , � �
:;;;:,�forcad or.coerced sexual . ;�:, ; =-, - �� ;.z r�
.,yY '..
-,•tO11C�11IIg. i�IIj� SCJCII� CAIItc1Ct'.: •-
=; between an adult and a child is �
3,�.��.��?. . �. r .' sexual �iolence. . � . . , �,���Et�`�;;
� � t �� - � • . - . .. �� -�•� : � .,�: ,. _..,...
'���;: Societal violence occurs . ..' -wf ��= �� �->
- when our natioq instituti�s and
- `- �:media portray violence as a '�`�''
�s`;,'method.ofresol � confli �'�'`$'�"`'L`'�
::�:. �'�S �k'� ;,���„:,:
. � - �,exPressing anger, and/�/����� •j .
. W11L1 V� ij� 1'JI
•ffd�� : fi Vi11Gr$. ,. ' �I . , , �
� • —Jran Paaoeit not � iearat . � �s: , ' . . .
z, . . : ' .'.i•
• ' ' ' • , � ;�, .. . � ..
:lti!i�ii;j��tS�fc212ii�'.�?� �Kr�z2;>v.avj�`3f�''uyr,�,c�jf�;fiSr;i1:,��'si:,.?t•:li;;i7;i?�`i>y5:3;iS:tJ:::ji;�i?+?Sft3K�f�R
� _�: .. ,. , • . .. � . ._. ; . .. , .�
�
�
,
m
Resources for Violence
in Dakota County
Flrst Call for Help (geaeral issues)
335-5000
B. Robert I,ewis House
Eagan 452-7288
Inver Gmove Heights 457-0707
Brotherpexce 929-5713
Crisis Nursery 432-5528
DAkota Ca Adult/Child Protection
891-7400
Dxkota Ca Cdsis Iine (24hour)
891-1414
DAkotst Ca Hetp Line 431 2424
Dalwta Ca SezuAl Assault Services
431-2424
Ds�kota Ca Public Health 552-3115
Domestic Abuse Project 8747063
Eagan Counseling Clinic 454-0114
Family Service 451-1434
Fathen Resouroe Center 8741509
Linden Center 686-7521
Iutheran Soci�l Setvices 871-0221
.Mina CoalitIon for Battered Women
646-0994
Parents Anonymous 487-2111
Suicide Hotline 347-2222
WomanKind (Fairview Ridges)
892 Z500
c�.�ys�«f�pr��for
Ballertd WOmar: �
Cas� De Eaperanu 772-1611
Community University Health Ctre
Center (Asian) 627�774
Divis[on of Indian Work 872-1798
Eagles Nest Shelter (Native Am.)
222-5830
Institute for Black ChemicAl Abuse
(IDCA) 871-7878
For wron injornratiar, oaU SS1,�i11S
Providad bythe Violence Preventioa
lnitiative of the Dakofia Council for
Healthy Communities
n
�i��w:v;,:,r:ti.;7c2i.vri:ti'•.. '1;:rii2trW't:�iit,•:
a
E
' ' I �
' � 4
.. ; •: ... . :. .: :.. ... : _.. . : � ,.
; ,o , C��akota::Counci���fd.r�:Hea[t�iy� C�
October;10, 1994
• �F.
�m[��itiirti`es
. � :::::�::
... . � . � ;:�.. .::.
Charles Mertensotto
Mayor and City Council
City of Mendota Heigh�ts
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
�
Dear Mr: Mertensotto:
i
I am writing on behalf of the Dakota Council for Healthy Communities to request that
you proclaim the week of October 23-30, 1994 Violence-Free Week and October 27,
1994 to be Turn Off the Violence Day in your community. Our purpose is to create
public and community awareness about the different aspects of violence and how it
affects our lives.
;
, For too `many people, violence is becoming an ordinary way of resolving conflict,
releasing emotions, and responding to everything from boredom to preceived injustice
to sexual frustration. Fear of violence has sparked a public interest in preventing
violent acts by mobilizing communities to address this issue. You and citizens in your
community can be part of the solution.
The Dakota County Board of Commissioners has provided leadership for �this initiative
by adopting the enclosed resolution. The County Board asks that your city council join
us in this effort by making a similar proclamation.
�
The Governor has declared the week of October 23-30, 1994 as Violence-Free
Minnesota Week. A series of activities will be promoted throughout the state focusing
on the prevention of violence. One of these activities will be the Violence Prevention
� Poster and Essay Contest. A copy of the proclamation is enclosed.
;
October 27, 1994 has been declared Turn Off the Violence Day by the hundreds of
, organizations across the country that make up the Turn Off the Violence coalition of
which the Dakota Council for Healthy Communities is a partner. On t�at day, the
, coalition asks people to choose nonviolent ways to resolve anger and conflict and to
; turn off violent television programs, not listen to violent music, not to go to violent
� movies or rent violent videos. Perhaps for many people that can be the beginning of
lifelong changes in attitudes and behaviors.
,
;
� ;
;
; ,
;
; !
A number of community and public awareness activities are planned for the week of
October 23 in Dakota County. Watch your local cable access channel for a program on
violence in Dakota County that features a panel of local people. Educational packets
have been distributed to community coalitions, organizations, schools and faith
communities. Press releases, highlighting local community activities, will be sent out to
local media. Materials on violence prevention will be available at displays in the
pakota County Libraries of Wescott, Wentworth and Galaxie.
If you would like more information, please call Cathy Mackiewicz, Prevention Resource
Coordinator at Dakota County Public Health Department at 552-3112.
Thank you for your support of our efforts. Only by working together will we be able to
raise awareness about violence issues impacting our youth, families and communities.
Sincerely,
� , � 9//i ��� i
r
Patrice Bataglia, Chair
Dakota Council for Healthy Communities.
Enclosures (6)
cc: City Administrator
o:proclam
a
N
I
�
;
�
���„�.� ��� -�► :_ fs. . ��
i�a ""�.� �s„ - ,
�; ,.,�i�?�.I l I�.,y+� ` . rw�
..� ;, . 1�H�a:Nrr,y'� .�i' �'
�iTiiiittityyyuyt x ',�:, � l�Yw � ':
� t� .�� �nci��: i IIII212iRi'QIl71 YII�]
f�Rii��:�:`�'? �'t�c.?",��;:'..�,�.��.�..�.
/ �"" �t� �
j..r+�.r
! • ± ".i+.��������
�
1
wnsRr.nss1
i
�HEiti:n:.'t j
HH��It�AS: �
WIIE:RtiJ1S:
i
I
V7118RRi1S: i
1
f
W1lERE71Ss
4
iiiiEREAG: i
Violence ta�peogie�and ptoporty Aas l.ncrraoed in many rac�iaa:s, aommnn3iSc
and ACiqhborhoodn acr•os¢ Minneaota end haa.graAtly impacted our �eoi.rle,
thalr act4ons ttnd our tlust in ono attathar; snd
Stzessqthenittg £a�iiiaa, coattstunitiea and indiVidna2 liveG io pcumota the
licalth and wel�-baing of ev�aryqne ir contral to pCeventing vioZence; and
Mfnnexotane arp e4rnsoittad to 4ho baliof that Lhe aauses ot the incten�cd
viaionco caa be attoativoly addiCaaed in humane end xosk etlectiva
at+Zaroaoheet anQ
A collalsorakive etPnrt !G naad�rd ko canCYant thce causea a£ vioicnaa amonq
all �agmrnt� oi' ouC �oci�ty, a11 Malka of ltfr, all patts ot oar eoelo-
aconatpia orfler and -a1.2 bltsStstssi tducatian, gavertrm:nt and reiigiaas
groups� an�
Spart�s, music, uadia and Ccmmunity 7ctad4tc nced to prenaat ponitiva
acs�aqes ttsat tttrn aray Pzopt violenae ae� an aoccptab2o aetl.vity pr prs a
aolatlon t0 �r4bleaet Ond
�ach and rvery Mittnoaatan aeedn to aak what thQy porssonally can do �a
pravarit Yiolant buhaoifl[ its t��msalv�a ot tA Othera� and
Stcispiag thR incra�aC of �3oSencC in our eociety aAd in our livea can ind
mu�t b�qiq i�aadintely� And •
4fREREASs � Evcty gersan in xspnesata han a tfght ta Iiva SreC frvm vialenee,
i
NOtf Tt1ltAL'FORRr Z• AItt3E !!. C7IRLSON+ GovtriSOC o£ tk¢ Stat� aC MlnaCaota, da h@raisy pt
xeak of October 2"J-29, 199� ta bC
!
�
a
� V I OL�NCE PItL� N IBNSSpTJ1 irTEEX
i
�
i
,
1
5'' K!f '1' A Et•Y t}�'FT A F
t
,
1N W7TNRS5 WItBAEON, 1 hava hac�unta aet my
hand and caoaed Chr Gceat S�a� at thr Etaea
oE Hinneaota Co uc Nfiixad aL• Che .",batr
Capita� tkziw fit�:t day oI Octobcr in the yaa
oE uur Lord one l.houaand aine handrad and
nina�y-fout dnd of the fitato the oae hnndred
d11J thirty-aixeh,
�1�. � C►�i�._� .,�
UUYP.RNQft
Don't Let Your
�
�
Go Down the T��ha
Set limits on what children can
watch. Homework and a meal
with the family take priority.
Watch Tv with your children and
talk about what each of you liked
and didn't like.
� Set an example. Carefully choose
your own programs and the amount
of time you watch television.
� Make one room a Z'V Free Zone —
a comfortable place to read, talk,
and listen, with no television set.
� Don't use TV as a babysitter.
�
�°
�=
Use
Television
Wisely
Encourage your children to spend their free time in activities such as
sports, hobbies, playing with friends, or reading rather than sitting in
front of the tube.
Limit video games to a half-hour a day. Use a kitchen timer.
Look for TV programs that encourage kids to do something — build a
treehouse, start a hobby, help out at home, volunteer to help someone.
Look for TV programs that relate to a book, something your child is
studying, an experience from your own childhood or that of a relative.
� Don't use TV as a reward or punishment.
� If you find a TV ad offensive, write or call the advertiser and the station.
ruR� °ff .
. ��e
�d(�� c e
TAKE A 8lTE OU1' OF r
��
How to Use: Usa as handouts, bookmarks, newspaper and newsletter aRicles, or envelope stuffers.
For too m� of us, vio(ence is an
ordinuy way to be entenained and to solve
wnflicts. It's up to each aius to decide to
"turn offthe violence".
� , .
Volencr is a� yti»u rom�one hum som�one on purpou
with wordi or attioiu
. . . - - . .
ConHia can be a neoasary, evra tueful fom that
°II�°"n8a c�anS� and grovvch. How people rapond
to oonflia — by nonvioleat or violent means — is a
quation of dioia.
When in conflict, remember...Anger is
OK Violence is no�
Communicati�g �thout �olence
Mger is a mtucal and aaeprable feeling
that everyone experienca. However,
when angry feelings are mishandled, thry
can evencually'show up in harmfvl ways. Hcee
ue some tips co ake rare oEyoueself without
anyone being hurt.
�Spea,E fsom the lxart
• S6ac+e your feelings and needs
• Make a nquat, not a demand
• Respect the other person
�Lisun fmm the heart
• Puc youcselF m the otha persoa's ahoes
• As1c the otha persons feelings and needs
• Repeac what yeu hard lum or ha say
Somr e.xs.� n.. M.�a�eaRae„snY. Gn��a,ion��e
C�namvrfartl�M�Id CenrsrJGrNrirsrolenrC�urm�eeFaaLn,
�M��••�� �� ox.ulr� �zr�a�r-rrz3.
Ux�1 r�b jarntrinr.
Controlling Anger �thout Violence
Incroducing THE CHILL DRILL, a
Fail-safe anger conaol technique that can help
3'ou harn�ss che power of your anger energy and
channel it constructively�� �U
r ��
- - - - � �,l
�N Cool to ��
CHILL: Calm yuur bod�s anger energy.
1. Chill. When you 6rsc become aware of your
anger, tell yourself to chill.
2. Blow! Thinking "chill° is your cue co
take saong, steady brraths as if blowing up
a balloon.
3. Relaz Your Face. Change tlie angry
exprasion on your face, Smile.
4. C:et Some Space. Take a step back from the
source of your anger. Take cime to nflea.
CHOOS& Focus your mind oa
positive action.
1. Claiia Yonr Anget; Take responsibiliry; ic's
your angcr.
2. Name The Hnrt, Idendfy your hurt feelings
under your angu;
3. Tame Yonr Auge� Thin�C about whac else
you can do m take the edge off your angec
4. Mak�e a Plan. Focns on aolntions; take
positive action.
?be GSillDrid'wa 1ndi�eJipJaaa Sfpt, %D, ti�J1��'
t�1���ldrill�ewal�l+rlac 019A1Rry'arFsnril;7�OlMsav
��� i►lNS5139 (6[2�i! SZA?.
Sett��ng Arguments
�thout wolence
Some practic�l taccics ac�e;
• Identify the probl Focus on the roblem
not the person. P �
• Keep an open mind. Things aren'c always the
way you think thry are.
• Be honest. Tell the other person how you feel.
• Listen cxnefully. Talce cime to heu what rhe .
ocher person •is saying. Put yourself in his or
her shoes.
• Brainstorm soludons.
• If you andcipate a difFicult situadon,
Plan ahead. Think of alternadves chac can
peacefully resolve the dispute.
• Postpone decisions if possibla Give yourself
cime co calm down and awid overcraccing.
• Be open to compromise.
• Consida avoiding che conflicc Somecimes
it's not worch it to argue.
• Ask someone else to listen to both sida
and help work out a crasonable, nonviolent
soludon.
V
. • . .
Verify the �olence F-ormula
Wacch a popular T'V sliow, movie, video game
or music video and listen to songs eep crack
of che specific accs of violence on ecklist
in this brochure.
Counc che number of "Jolts" pe ucc che
excitement of a violent act, e or Cast-
paced sane. Notice when e violent
�ola.occur.
T'hcn, ask some hard qu ns:
• �olenf Storylines
Vt7ould chere be a thout
the violent confli .
Does the scene e lence seem �
acciting, humo or macho?
Are the chara s racist, sexisc
or stereonmi
• Violent Consequences
/Are consequences of
the violence showri?
' Doyou see people'hurc
or bleeding on screen?
Do chose who die
simply disappead
• Good GuysBad Guys
Who are the �goodguys" and "bad guys"?
When and how do thry use violence diffenendy?
Do the "bad guys" have {am�ily or others who
will cane if chry get hurt or killed.�
• Consider Alurnam�es
How could the conflicc have
been solved wichout violence?
How did you feel abouc the
violence when you �vatched ic?
Sormc Mel'wdVilreALlecn� Swmser 53. lAbiS Sbnunlc.bi,
�.�n� CA A003t Uaa1 otrblerrRteri�e,
. . , :'{t'" �;c! - - - - --..�. . _._. - -. .. . .---- �• -----: --. . _...... - _.. _. . .. _ .. ._. ___.__ .. ._..
• . .. •'•3,'?N r{ .'�'""'' .} :�•:.:; ' !'ti';� �'::�� :; � . -• . .
' . .%4', j� . '.�FI:.� �• ' . ..
�':.2i,s�: �
,,4Y� ' •.�;;k::�•; . •
.; �•,i`..; i i;s=+�:;•..,c . :
' ° :.. .,E'� � :'i'��1�' ="�'��:. . e, ' '
; t ti::�; ` ' ; '., :
(A'�,-�.t^ ';4;C:;.4;t ':h; 4�i:;,%; :i � � '•{ �?''�1r�l'�9'•:k�'C;;;i.,.� �.4�,.:. `,�, , , ,
�i � i�:� ` ��: :�t;`�i � :.1 � \;:'"�' •t;:� v:: :::;:;,;yi;:;:;h;�;;;�p ;�..� .
1 .�o � � i, t• t. ;�a: 7,j{;::: .�•`.ti•+: 7: t t �
}; ( ut.2• � f• '.1 'S
�'''�'� �;�:;h: .� .
�j J r• � . i i i�t ;a" ii3'', � Yp ,f ! (,
l ! S i� � i +,� . i : :;' . . ii • ''i�`k � !:i �4'''t,�:
�� ,' f {JS '�!t� � 9 1 � { , �i>•. °j, i 'ti }'i ip'4!j , �i�4�'S{� ''ic' :cii' '•;:>E'• ii;.•: ii 4�. �.i':�;::>:i( �i;4 :;:�'r,;;
„i , t ...7 '' r�f :� }�1 jf��j, 1 1 � , y ��}} ,!s'N,.y��y?�o��t�,, t i'. i:a i`� :�tf ` '4g,(, �?2u,:ss}�, �.� �� '}w�S'! i? �. ' �• t. .�2....t5�,'y,}
. �W:• .�i :I1• ,iF... +i'24. 'k:� ••�}'�I.� • ii �.. ��. � 1+! »{�i(� �� � i � 4: } 4 y� �j ��) ��� jJ'
':. .•�i.. �.�. , �,' i \ .. Y. i %�: •�;:77 ; .�. . },.. �s . .��..5�'�. .� .,�f .�� i � �{,� • N � � � ,•� v� w?
., ;f: t. , n�,._ �:r.:.a < r.!i., . •.},,: � . �t.,!•.•Ns. , � H`S••�,. . , •� >, ���.t�t. e 3 i, ::c.. .�, ['� t� .i
.� �. .•1�V '����'��.. :,i,. i��i� ,i .� � Pl, � , �I ) : ) �, , •'!:.
. �•.r„ � �. ?i • at:, ���� . � K:%' x 2 b ��.K
'.�r .a �.. . . . . , • .:r i:�.,.. , �:� � . !� . ��!y . . �. ai.. 'c ,� ,
:'i . . .. .. . . i. . �� ..:.... . . e . :. �•oa;...,•.,i•
. , � . »: . . .. . :c���.. . <������ • ,.r2:�€,.•��,,.•..t: s,.
�, . �s� � . . , .. . F „i.c i .
� �>'i_ . .�.'�::. . . .. .;a . . : ����',.�.,.�,�. .�. :. ���,,E�},'� !;
.. ,1�. . . . . . . `_� . .. : �., . . . . .. . . .w, , ....�: . -.r. . • l..,. :a�'�'r�, .
. . .. . .. , . , •-�,:
wolent Acts
In �Entertainment Check List
Look at the entatainment you
choose: Counc che number of
violrnt accs/words/attitudes in
nch eategory of che media.
Talk with family and friends
abou� what you discovered.
Seyrre Brmidjr Arr` Ti`rn Off t&
�ol�n�t Commitut, Bemidjr, MN
Uttl roith pmnurion.
'���2i,'ifi�t� :'i�� 1"�;:
:.�• : {7. .�i r4 �1r,.•..� �l?`�
:g•; , , ..
Nonviolent Media ldeas for Parents
1. Set guidelin« and limits about what is
appropriate family viewing.
2. Help yout children sdect prognms.
3. Include ehildren in funily decisions abouc
what you will watch together.
4. Be aware of whac your children are
watching and dont use TV as a babysitter.
5. Be a good role model and donc wacch
violent shows.
6. Wacch telcvision wich your c6ildcen and
calk about whac you see and what it
means. •
7. Don'c use'I'V as a tewud or punishmenG
8. Use your VCR m tape thoughdul and
seleccive encertainmene
��
9. Encourage children m � >
become involved in
more active free dme 4
activides: sports> .
hobbies, reading. �
10. Join wich ocher puena in your aommunicy co
pcess for moce and better programs for children
and families.
So,r� aern.letae.lw� ab.n„ r..,r�r�r.. s�e rhrn�rrrt�; .Rt
MeliedVilrnMelenti Srmmerl99.� 196iSbixaJub� Lir
M�ela G! 900.;t
�����
Availab(e &om Tura Off the volence:
� �,,,�"'�.', .
ury,m�
Reproducible bc+o�hures at no cost;
• About che Campaign
• Tuming on Awueness
• Taking Accion
30 page reproducible guides:
• Educadon Ida Guide $2
• Communicy Ac[iori Guide $3
Ask about our speakecs aad our
merchandise catalog. .
Conna us for [his year s Oaoba Tum Off c}ee �olena Day.
Turn Off the �olence
Citizens Council
Boz 27558
Minneapolis, MN 55427
(613) 593-8041
Local Addras:
Turn Off the Violence is a collaborative of 85
organizadons and hundreds of individuals to
encourage nonviolence in encerrainmenc choias
and real-life behavio� The program is guided by
a Steering Committee and administered by the
Minn. Citizens Counal on Crime and Jusaa.
'lpse ted h�ee to aopy and dis
TuR ff�ef
id jeNc e �
�'.— ---. --, 1� • -- —Y.i`.""' — — . , .. . .'S!!
• • _ • :`i':r:;., . .
_.. .. �v.._.. . _. , .�.. _.�1�..., ... . .. � "'�,�..._�...._ . . .
TUR � ���
,'��iE'
/c� �E�l� C eTM
Ed�ecating and empowering individuals
to choose nanvioknt entertainnunt
and rtorsviolent ways to deal with conflic�
Turning on Awareness
Tips and Tools
Violercce is a learned behavior.
It can be unlearned.
x'bua this broc6ure.
� ���
-.�:. ��:�;��:��:-:::;�< ---- ---- - . --- .__._._�___...-�-----�
��:, :<:;;�:-.�t.�;,�.,..
;.��: - � .� .. .
,�r ,
.�E'� �E :,,�;::,; �. ;
:.ti"
. `>
..�� .
t ::' i. ��r ..
� ';? 1`;:�•�cii�i:j�°t�,': r :''. e•...
. . k?;�'i:�.+.t� "3; :;.: • .
' '•:�'i',. ::,5��`<
::;�,:= �,♦�h•1'..t , .
�ry'� �t,; : 'L� .'�. �' '�j'. '. .� iY, , ,. _ . - .. ,.... .
���, � ': '��tS� 1 ' � t'}� 'yh�� �... t " ,2�r • i,� • �7f �''`:. ti:���{ ��"''� �t �t�ilY::� �''�'f.
;t.•,%i;..�`,!�'•,,' N� 1•}�^tNs���Yt , e� ��g,�.t�'�!i'£�,�.V yl.�I�����,',
i:;I�. :;�`}±�i.� ��G, a� �..�. •:��; .�',�,i�ici�:,`.;;i:.�' ;.�• .1i3�i. ,nt;::o- o. ,F}.',:'i . . , .
. . �::';^ {: � . l
. . " l' . ., •
. _ {
' �
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�� �
�
i
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Ad ' t
FROM: `
SUBJECT:
Paul Kaiser
Fire MarsTial
3rd Annual Fire Awards
October 14,
i
DISCUSSION•
�
�
In continuance with the Fire Safety Awards Program to recognize those busin
consistently aad conscientiously emphasize the importance of fire safety in the wc
for the community the following businesses are to receive plaques of recognition.
�Somerset Country Club
Tempco Manufacturi.ng
Mendota Heights Cycling & Fitness
Snyder Drug
5t. Thomas Academy
Cra.y Research
VGC Corporation
�Solvay Animal Hospital
Courtyard by Marriott
�/Batesville Casket
Associated Bureaus
Specialty Equipment
American Registry of Radiologic
Technologists
ACTION REQUIlZED:
Center for Diagnostic Imaging
Minnesota Knitting Mills
LCS Metal Stamping
�colab
dSt. Paul United Methodist Church
�✓Mendota Heights Animal Hospital
Cherry-Richline
✓3M Company
�t. Peter's Church
G.N.B.
Applied Coating Technology
liirner Gymnastics
Present the plaques to the businesses showing their continued commitment for
1
PK:dfw ;
which
.ce and
safety.
i t ii • :1 �
131 �
4ctober 13, 1
TO: Mayar,
a
FROM: `'
SIJB,TECT:
City Cauncitl and City Adminis t
7ohn P. Maczko
Fire Chief
Firefighter F..xplorer Pragram
DISCUSSION:
Attached is a letter from Jerry Nelson regarding the interest of the member
Mendata Heights Fire D�partment in starting a Firefighting Fxpiorer Post at our st
J'eny explains, the explorer progr�m is a young adult program affli�ated with the B�
America. T�is explorer pra,gram will enable young adults an opportunity in a proi
pmviding a service to the community. There are some explorer pmgrhms already
Dakata County at the :�ire departments of Eagan, App1e Valley and I�astings. Wes
also has an active Police Explorer Post.
The City would not have any risks far sponsoring such a program. There are s1
that must be followed and tbe fire chief has the final decision on all program contei
Insurauce is provided by the Boy Scouts of America and all e�alorers are covered �
policy. There is a small initiial startup cost of approximately $250.OU for postage a
natification of interested young adults. After a penod of time, various fund raisers
by the explarers to pay for their awn expenses.
ACTION REQUIRED:
i
Listen ta the presentation and farmulate any questions regarding the explorer pc
shauld then decide if it wishes to support this program.
• �,
af the
�tian. As
y Scouts of
;ssian of
n pla.ce in
� St. Paul
rules
:r this
i be held
Cauncil
John Maczko, Chief
Mendota Heights Fire Department
2121 Dodd Road
Mendota Heights, Minnesota
October l, 1994
Dear Chief Maczko,
The members of the Mendota Heights Fire Department are interested
in starting and Explorer Eost at our station. Exploring is the
young adult program of the Boy Scouts of America. It is a division
of the Indianhead Council, BSA.
Exploring units, called Posts, are run by volunteers from within
community businesses, agencies and organizations, usually specializing
in each organizations career field. In our case it will be run by
five members of the Fire Department, or� of which will be yourself.
Exploring is a coeducational program for any young person, male or
female, ages 14 through 20. There are many established Explorer
Posts in and around our area.as well as out-state.
It would greatly benefit our Department in so many ways; from fire
prevention to future prospective employees. The benefits to the
students will be goal orientated. The s�tdents can take it as far
into the fire field as they are willing to go. However, according
to the Explorers rules, they are not allowed inside a burning
building for fire attack.
There is a small start-up fee (around $250) the
cost to the Department will drop as they start
Also, the Explorer Post is self insured through
no risk to the city of Mendota Heights.
Sincerely,
�'�� a�1��_ �
Jerry Nelson Jr.
Firefighter
first year. The
funding for themselves.
BSA, therefore at
:: ; I
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
� 1VIII��O
t •
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Ad ' t
October 13, 1994
FROM: ' 7ames E. Danielson, Public Works D' _
�
i
SU�JECT: Kensington Manor Homes - Roadway Condemnation
�
DISCUSSION:
,
Mr. Bill Lentsch has proposed to rezone Outlot B, Mendota. Woods from
back to R 1 single family residential and develop the lot with a single family hoi
delayed action on Mr. Lentsch's request subject to him obtaining driveway acce�
from the Kensington Manor Home Association across Broo1�'ield Lane. Mr. Le�
met with the Manor Home Board of Directors aad explained the issue. They un�
problem and were sympathetic, however when they took the request to a vote of
members, the request failed.
The Planning Commission has recommended and Council aiways supporl
access for this outlot to come from where it was always intended, Braol�eld La�
the Manor Home members voluntarily negotiating access for the outlot, the only
course of action is for the City to condemn a roadway easement across Broo�'iel
make it a' public street. < ,
,
RECOIVIlVIENDATION:
Without access from Broo�'ield Lane, Outlot B, Mendota Woods will be
and undevelopable. Brool�'ield Lane is a private st�reet owned by the Kensington
Homes Association aad access cannot be gained without their cooperation. The ]
Association has voted not to give their permission, therefore the only remaining �
�
allow access from Brool�'ield Lane for Outlot B is for the City to acquire access 1
condemnation.
�
ACTION REQUIRED:
➢
If�Council desires to implement the recommendation they should pass a m
adopting Resolution No. 94-_, RESOLi1TION DIRECTING THE ACQUIS]
CONDEIVINATION OF CERTAIN PE � ROADWAY EASEMENZ
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, DAKOTA COUNTY,I�IINNTSOTA. Co�
then authorize the City Attorney to take the necessary steps to begin condemnatio
against the Kensington Manor Homes Association for acquisition of Brookfield L
public roadway easement. I haye already requested that Mr. Blake Davis prepare
establishing a value for the roadway easement. All costs for this action need to b
�
1 �
;. Council
for the lot
�ch and I
.rstood the
requiring
Without
Iane, and
�
'ION BY
IN T�
cil should
action
ie as a
u� appraisal
recovered
�
from Mr. Lentsch or Mr. Irving Clark owners of the outlot. These costs could be recovered
either by assessments to the lot or paid in cash by Mr. Lentsch or Mr. Clark.
Note: Copies of this memo have been forwarded to Roberta Cline, Homeowner's
Association President and to Mr. Bill Lentsch.
� \ �\ �� �, fr f ��0� � �'i • .., , • ' '' ('�+� � � �
�`—� J / %� O oJ •_,�' , � � \
` � � �,---
', i `�� h •' � � , ` ` ., ,�
i / � � �� �, � � ` - �, _ -. � i � � � � � • `` t�r�' l �`
r /� � `�S. �> > i� `` ^ � i � � � ' i
c_ ' � _ �
t l� y
. �
i _
r - 894 ,��� \� �+�� �� ` ` ` = � s�.o ��` " \��., 1 (~ ! os i
i 1 � "� �l . {-�., .�..-.-,-�.
-- � � f �\ � � \' .r�' �},.r' .. r-. ��"' 'I
�y,, ! ,,/� ' ,,�{� 1 I '
_.,, t, (/ tl �\V �\} � ��� � J 7�� � � , o `18 "`O'�T �� � 't �
..., �"'� , .... „_ �- / � �! � '" i$' � � � f �
` "� ~'�f �` � � '�� , ,,,,, ,,,,, . ' �
� / � � - �1
� ti �i � � _ ;..
�. ' ! �,-=-=�= ! �� � j � tr� � � -� � � � a 8 , _ _ f � � �,i �,� ,�� }�
:.. �
;���' , ����' �� ,,1� �'`•,.,, Z � �%= _ _ ''' �''^ �����
-�" � ,�� � 1� \ `� � -. �--,.^.�„ — — }�'�,��
. � ,�� � �'.' s �J�� r
... . • • •y�� , " ��� .1 C�%/� a j ��//
... ._.. ... ...... l� � � . � � t � t✓/b / �i� �!I
� „ ... , � j _�'"'._ :} , .� `� ��� 1 � / �
'�,ttljt
;, ' 1 `�•� � � ��{ I ( /
,' ^�,,,� — t � ::.4 � � �� � \ �
r �`=�"'-" � i l� � i/' /� '- �• � \~�� � \� , �'��/j,� ( � �l\l,'�1 J
� ,. /J " "" ��``��k., '�;: ��� "(! � � � 1
� 1� \ ' �t�'! :Y;: :;; 3 \ �", ,,. � -.; /�� � J
, �, � / � �'"1 �� � � �j11 ., o Z,�- `.�;�;� . . � \ ��- �.,, � p , �
• � �/ �'' � i'�'p/ � ��� J /�� `/ t 10� /�/ // /�'-- �''�".� ti' �1 %��—_—�..`.,� ' ., � �
� � ``� �r I � � �� �/f� �� � � ` �,,.�,, / � _��� � i
,.. ' ��1��� �i � /, t � �- , 1 � -- ,%�' ��i/t �
� �y� � � '��`"' r 1 � .�j/ � �, ,ll��� 11�{���� `�l�` � `' � 1� �,11 /j� f � f = � � i,�fl ,�;
\\�\ \ 1 / '� � ��.`\ � � � b t \ % / � � ` ,, � � ��i /11��
r' �\\�,�,� .� � f p�f�j��� _... �,�,�`.�\\\ `\t` ��' f i ,�`l��l�ll� ,�i,,,. �o`s l��ly �r/i
... '�� lI fr �lJ/�%�' �� 1 11� \�l`�'1�If)�l /�����., l�ll�/l1� ���
�,..a �� o f �i��i � i �� tit �'' � � 1 ` � ta �i��i � ��i�i � ��
-'��� ��I J/�jJJ��i �/ L .� i�? ��K����. -. 1��` 1 t��� I!� � �l�i �li �� l� ,
I1/�� { 1ik �/ � 1'(' � �'' ��ll �,j�ll1��,���
l l '� %��l � ( t ��) �1 � il � 1 1� l f���� � F �/?l �/ 1����/Ir �i
, p j 1/// � 1�)��"l � i l/� I t 1 �.` � i� � i1l/ ''� I �/ 1 l I� f,��
lir � r
� � ! � E � ► � ! � , � ' �►r .,- �� � r �r ,
�� i i r �� �� X J�i�i����r � ����i�� 1 ��i�, ��
�l�� � ��l �� .._.._ 1 . !l !/I l� � /j� , ,
f /N t �\�\\ .�. _.. � � i! �' j 1A� � 11 �/1 �/lll 1!I ( / ! �� �' � '
.� w 1 � ._.. .., /// ! /yJ�l�l l/ 1 1 /1 � ��>> � lj � i �, i
•. _ �///� �+ \l\�\\�� � ...z � �� �� lj/1/j�l/��li�//� ( f//�J/y�'i/ /i�! �� i
/jl� \\ � .�9i �', 1 � /t/ / �II� 11 ��1�, /j/��r ; � � �
� __ ' , o <<i �� _ _ � � �i� r ;�r,� �� ,� �i►i ri in ,,; ,
0 6 8 - :,,, JI// � \l°'t1t ! — --- � ' � � //%// i iy ��i�/I/ Jl � r � I ! �
� � � j � � � `� ... � '=- jl� s,..�����/!//�l��il �` � �/I// /! �j1���1�/��
� �,,, r
— � a� �// �/ l....`�, I! l!� 11 f�;1 �
` ` ` i r �-�- --� � ��'�f ''' / l �!Y � :.. � l Il��% / j /a=5����
,,,,,,. -- �� "= ��/ �� I�� ' !l�/�/if /' /�l � r
a ,.�,. ,- � -- � � f/1 �� ij' 11 �, �
-�-��� � ����/ � r�' =�; )�1j111j��\� \, � �l�/��jjj! r l�f�/ ``�fr��I' 1
� 1��' t o % ! �� � //!I /�l\ � � .%/j1t I � `�?�� �11�� t�jt��rt �i
� � 1 �''�� ��C,'') / 1 / /I i 1 / � f//jJ� �� � �
-, .. ,� �,\�'� � =I �f .�%i,.! � �ij `T lr' /I �i�l��j/���i� �i�,��f j/r �i
= , � \ ` � � p� � =� � -tS � %/ f ..- �,�` � / ��j I 1 � � /j �%!� f� �' �ji' � i
� �, ,,,, _' ,•./ � 1 / �i .�,.` � �/ J///lj��G f i r/� 1 �
'`� � ��' � 1 (t_-',..� � � � \ � �� 1��,�''�.� �/!j���/�������� J/�a/�tI/I�J �
�co � L,. f A �( / � --�= ..� "� �\ .... _'..' �+�7t •- /��'/;6y��,y�`1 �'��'°� II%�! i
��� ^i {�I�r.---_.•, r" / /1/l I j� /��J I{/ � �
1 � r i iii��' l�`gp4`�,'.•r <<� r,,,r�� ; i i,, 1 i�,
�� � 1����i �� ��l�''�,�'' ..._ ������ ��lijfi�%'���!f�itlll���j�
j tl 1/ �.. � t�---_�''�.\� 0 /� /(
,. . � � � r o� ..� ���, j;�, ;%ri j i�� I 411�N �i;
. �� �ii�j�;%�,��,I�r�t �g�ui'i�i;
� �..
-- --- -- -.-�—_�r_. ___._ ___u�.- - __ ___�___.n�__. - - --�— - __._----,—
� � �' �
PONDHAVEN � ANE• � 4 \
-o ; 5 ! � : : f ' . � • E� p ND � ,
z '4� s . � � „a\ � � � `�
4 5 i 9 I O I � � � �QJ `
4 �2
� �� 0 7 �. 'G �Q`� � �
� Z - p� � � � \
.�.;� . .. 2 t � 8 �.� � �
� � : .j �1 8 m ,� � �� � 13. ' ,
s :�t:.", .T:•.:i� � i� � ��� � �
9 �.. , 10 Zp
� 3 c�~y� 1 _. i
� 14 �.
. __ . .. .. ; ��i
MENDOTA �IEIGHTS . ROAO -
• . � , (0 . .. • 11 . 10 '
I �. �
� G �c
� , � f �
2 v 9 $ Ii 4� C� ��
J,� a ti C+ ' ���
�!0�'�� Q °
3 ,Rr �,,, � • 2 '�
'�` �'``" � � � 0Q� � 3 �
O .� . �'S P � �
� 4 P@ G Ov�� � � � 3 ',
�
I
�
O
v
5 6 0.
�
7
A
� RpOKF1E1-D
�8
1 P��
� O_
�O
O . �
4
� `
�
�� R '
1
1 .
a
j
! �
1
I
;+
� + City of Mendota Heights
� � Dakota County, Minn+esota
�
` RESULUTION NO, 9�-
t� A�E�SQL�ON DIItECTIl�IG THE ACQIfISITION BY CONDL�VIltiTA7
; CERTAIN PIItMANT1�TT ROADWAY EASEMENTS Ilv THE
CITY 4F MIENDOTA HEIGHTS, DAKQTA COIi��TTY, M�VNF.S{
;
W��I�AS, the City Councii of the City of Mendota Heights is the offic
body of the City of Mendota Heights; and
;
WSEREAS, a motion of Councilmember , sec
Counciimember , the following reso2ution was adopted by
affirmative vote of inembers of the Cauncil:
t
�
WHLREA►S, the CiLy of Mendota Heights, County of Dakota, State of M'v
the right to exercise the praeedure of emi.nent domain in order to acquire property
public use'ar purpose pnrsuant to the Minnesota. Constitution and the La.ws of the ;
Minnesota and acted thereunder; and
�
gaverning
by
�
has
for
WH]ER�AS, the City Council af the City af Mendota Heights finds that it is necessary
as well as desuable to acquire the following described easements for the stated pub�ic
purposes: + ; �
� �
A permanent easement for roadway purposes including the right of ingress a�
for the City and its agents, servants and cantractoars to enter upon the Easement Pra
reasonable times to construct, recanstruct, inspect, repair and maintain the City's m
roadway system, over, under, and across the fallowing described property: '
;
That part of Lot l, Black 3, Kensington PUD Additian, according ta the rec
thereof described as follows:
The westerly 44.00 faot and 44.U0 foot radius cul-de-sac drainage and utilit�
also known as B�ookfield Lane, together with a 20.0{} foat raadway easeme�
Outlot C, Kensington PITD Addition the centerline of said easement describ�
�
follows:
Co � mencin at the southwest corner of said Outlot C, thence easterl along
g Y
line�thereof 25 feet to the point of beginning of the centerline to be describe+
northeasterly deflecting to the left 50 degrees UO minutes, a distance of '75 fe
center line there terminating.
� e
i �
NOW THEREFQRE, BE IT �:ESOLVED BY THE CITY CQUNCIL Q;
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS IN REGULAR. MEETING ASSE1ViBLED tha
easements described above be acquired far the siated public purposes through exerc:
City af Mendota Heights' pawers af eminent domain.
,
}
1
�
egress
tv at all
plat
easement,
across
I as
Ghe sauth
; thence
�t and said
THE
those
es of the
Adopted by the Mendota Heights City Council this 18th da.y of October, 1994.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS
:
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
. ;;
r�� �b�b
� J' 1K�OY^ 0.v��
�'�e�r� .T a�li-orne.Y
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �' '-'� •`� -�
DAKOTA COUNTY,INIINNESOTA � � - . - � _
t -
, •
i RESOLUTION NO. 94
,
I
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR PARHING
; METRO II AT 1300 MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD
�
WHEREAS, Metro II has made application for a proof of parking varian
variance to the required parking stall size to allow a parking stall of eight feet, si
6"), as proposed on site plans in Case File No. 94-23; and
;
W�REAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission conducted a publi
August 23, 1994 to review said application; and
�
WHF.RF.A�, on August 23, 1994 the Planning Commission closed the public
voted unanimously (6-0) to recommend that City Council approve a proof-of-park
and a parking stall size variance to allow 8', 6" stalls, subject to confirmation by
to the usable office space; and
i
; �
�%VHI:RREEAS, the City Council reviewed said application for Variances at thei
6, 1994 and October 18, 1994 meetings; and
WHEREAS, the building contains 40,000 square feet and a change in the t�
use of the building could create a higher demand for parking; and
�V�AS, upon review of the application the City Council desired to g�
Use Permit rather than a proof of parking variance.
� and for a
inches (8',
hearing on
hearing and
ng variance
�itv staff as
September
mix or
a Special
NOW THEREFORE IT IS �BY RESOLVED by the City Council o � the City of
Mendota Heights that a special use permit for parking be approved with the followmg condition:
This special use permit is based on the current density of use at 24,0{}0 square feet of
office ace and y future uilding usage which would result in a substan�ial increase
in th�density an intensity use would require an amended special use permit for
P�'�g � I
,
1
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 18th day of Octolier, 1994.
�
ATTPST: � CITY COUNCII.
i CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGIi'T�S
i
� By
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
To:
From:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�� �
Octo er 14, 1994
Mayor, City Council and City Admini tra
Kevin Batchelder, Admuustrative Ass
Subject: ; Case No. 94-23: Metro II- Variances
f
, "
DISCUSSION
;
Ms. Joanne Chabot, Executive Director for Metro II, appeared before the (
Council at their September 6, 1994 meeting to request two variances. (Please see
Planners Report, staff inemo and application. ) The requested variances are:
i
1. A four stall variance to the required number of parking spaces; and
2. A parking stall size variance to allow a pazking stall of eight feet, six inche
j
F
At �the meeting the City Council expressed a reluctance to grant a variance �
required number of parking spaces because this only addresses the current use of tl
by Metro II and Commuaity Education. The building has potential to be used at a
density and City Council desired to be able to control the parking should the buildi
at a higher density. The City Council offered to grdnt a special pernut instead of t
variance. Metro II asked for a continuance to discuss this proposal with their lega]
(Please see attached minutes from September 6th.)
1
Metro II has responded in writing with an acknowledgement that they will �
Council's offer of a special permit to accommodate the parking regulations for thei
use of the building. They have suggested some language for a ResolutiQn of appro
that proposed language has been inserted into the proposed resolution that is attach�
see attached letter from Mr. Jay Squires, Attorney.)
RECOMMENDATION
}
The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend that City Council appro
proof-of-parking variance for four stalls and a parking lot size variance to allow 8'
f
;
ACTION REQUIRED
; �
Meet with the applicants. City Council should consider the proposed resolu
wluch adopts approval under a special permit, and if they so desire, they should pa
� motion appioving Resolution No. 94-_, A RESOLUTION APPROVIlVG A SPE
PEI,2MIT FOR PARHING FOR METRO II AT 1300 MENDOTA HIIGHT ROAI
y , -
; i
, �
� 1
�g� 6���.
�
the
building
be used
counsel.
cept City
current
�1 and
l. (Please
ea
6" stalls.
a
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNI'Y, n�IINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 94
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR PARHING FOR
METRO II AT 1300 MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD
WHEREAS, Metro II has made application for a four stall variance to the required
number of parking spaces and a variance to the required parking stall size to allow a parking
stall of eight feet, six inches (8', 6"), as proposed on site plans in Case Fi1e No. 94-23; and
WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on
August 23, 1994 to review said application; and
�% '+ AS, on August 23, 1994 the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and
voted unanimously (6-0) to recommend that City Council approve a praof-of-parking variance
for four stalls and a parking stall size variance to allow 8',. 6" stalls, subject to investigation by
City staff to confitm the amount of usable office space; and
WHEREAS, Metro II submitted a proof-of-parking plaa dated 8-23-94; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed said application for Variances at their September
6, 1994 aad October 18, 1994 meetings; and
WHFREAS, upon review of the application the City Council desired to allow the
requested parking variances under the provisions of a Special Permit in order to properly retain
control over the parking requirements determined by the use of the Metro II building.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights that a special permit for the above described parking variances is consistent
with the general welfare of the citizens of the community and the sunounding land; and
� BE IT F[JRTHER RESOLVED that said parking use is consistent with the general
purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance; and
. ,
' i �
, 4 ,
a �
,
BE IT FiJRTHER RESOLVED, that said special permit for parking be
the following condition:
, f
� 1.� This special permit is based on the cunent 24,000 square feet
� building office space area. and any buildi.ng modifications which �
� a substantial increase in the net interior square footage area would
, � subject of an amended special permit application.
�
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota. Heights this 18th day of Oc�
,
;
� �
� • CITY COUNCII.
, ' � CITY OF MENDOTA I�IG]
' BY
1 Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayc
ATTFST:' �
� ,
�
�
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
3
_
with
e or less
result in
to be the
, 1994.
SEP-15-1994 14�04 FROM RATWIK� R!]�ZAK� ET AL. TO 4528940
• RATWI�, RUS7AK, BERGSTRQM & MALtJNEY, P.A.
Paul C. Ratwak
3�hn M. Roszak
Feter D. B¢rgstrom
Patricie A. Malon�y�
Tcncncc J. Foy'=
Stephen G. Andersen'�'
Scott T. Anderson
Ke�ia J. RuPP
Jay T. SyuirC�
Claira C. disc�n
Ann R. Gocrin=
Nancy F... �lumsteirt
Kathryn M. �ilers
Sart� J. Ruff
SF•NT iTIA FAX (452-8940)
Attontc:;+s at Law
3U0 Pea�ey iiuilding
7�Q Second rl.vcnu� South
Minneapol't�. Minnesota .454Q2
Mr. Kevin Batchelder
Gity ef Me�dota Heights
21Qi Victoria Curve
Mendota Fieights� MN 551i8
{612) 339-OOGO
Fax{6121��g-��38
ot' connset
Da�id S. Bartcl
• Alcp admitted ia Vviscvnsin
"* �ivlt 1'rial Spccis�i.rt
Ccrti�ed by the Minno��ta
Staia $ar Asavciati�n
Septe�aber 15, 1994
RE: Metra IZ Parking Lat Appl.ication
Our File No. 1Q12-0023
Dear Mr. Satcheider:
This will foliaw--up aur telephone conversation on Tuesday,
Septembe= I3. I represent Metro II, �ahich owns a building in
the Mendota Hei�hts 8usiness Pa�k. Metro II ha� applied for a
penuit ta the Czty by which, throuqh pl.ans to recanfigure its
parking lot, Me�ro 2� will come inta compliance wi�th City
parking regulations.
It is my understandinc� �hat the Mendota Heights Pl.anning
Cammissian entertained this mat�er and forwarded ta the City
Council, for consideration at its September 6 meeting, a
recommendatian of.ap�roval of Metro�Il's variance applicatian.
The Planning Commission had questions about the•square footage
of the Metrv II buil.ding, a»d bet�een that meeting and the
Council's Sept�mber 6 meeting, City staff verified that the
Metre II interior space is in fact 24,00� square feet in area.
Ap�arently, the City Council had some concerns about
retaining th� abi.lity to monitor the parking situa�ion. The
Council also had concerns about building expansion. Should
Metro II, for example, sell the buiiding in the future, the
Council was concerned that the buildin� might be substantially
remodeled or added onto in such a fash�.on that Metro ZI's
parking lot recon�iguration plans Would not adequately support
that revi�ed us�.
� Metro II is very confident that its pre�ent and antiaipated
�use ef its building will be completely consistent with its plans
far �arking lot i.mprovements. In o�her words, Metro II is
;canf�.dent that the reconfigured parking lot will be more than
t
`SEP-15-1994 �14�04 FROM RATWIK� ROSZAK� ET AL. TO
�
Mr. Revin
september
Page; 2
Batchelder
I5, 1994 •
adequate to support�cu=rent buil.ding needs. To allev:
Council concerns, Metro II would be willing to accept
use permit in lieu of a variance, as suggested by the
and by which the Council would retain the ability to �
situation.
ti
,
To address the Council's concern about substantia:
modification of the building, the special use permit �
qranted on the presumption the net building office arE
24, 000 sc�uare feet (more or less) in size. It wouid I
parties interests to specify in the permit �hat would
done'in the future shauld there be consideration of st
increases in net interiot area. In this regard, we h<
discussed the notivn of an application for an amended
use permit at which time the Council could consider ti
alterations in Iight of City parking requirements.
i
In short, and per the City Council's suggestion, ]
in lieu of a variance as requested in its a�plicatian
accept a special use permit �ath the condition stated
foliows, which I have drafted in a fashion to be inse�
Council resolution:
iThis special use perniit is based on the curr�
1 24,000 square feet mote or less building off:
, ; space area. Any building modifications whic]
, j would result in a substantial increase in th�
j net interior square footage area would need 1
� be the subject of an amended special use pen
� application.
�
I believe the above language fairly addresses the
Council's expressed concerns. Metro II could not accE
sort;of sunset or duration condition, or a tying.of t2
; to Metro II�s independent use onl�. Such provisions i
� aa adverse affect on the saleability of the property.
Metro II is a public body and a consortium of lbcal s<
districts, such provisions would not be in the public
; and would be unnecessary to address City concerns.
�
As a final note, this letter confirms that, as we
Metro II, or a successor in interest, would not be wa�
future right to apply for a variance from then-existit
regulations.
�
If you have any questions on this matter, please c
i
� j Ver truly yours,
� • .
; ' � � a �. quires
JTS/blb
cc: �Joanne Chabot
a
� 1012/1tZ'2
, p
� t
P.03
.ate
a special
Counci I.,
tonitor the
future
ould be
a is
�e in both
need to be
bstantial
ve
special
e proposed
etro II,
would
as
ted into a
t
it
City
pt any
e permit
ight have
hool
interest,
...,�...�,.,
ving any
g parking
lI.
Page No. 4130
September 6, 1994
There being no questions or comments, Councilmember Krebsbach
moved that the hearing be closed.
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Mayor Mertensotto moved adoption of Resolution No. 94-63,
"RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING
ASSESSMENTS FOR SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER,
STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS TO
SERVE MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS PARK 4TH
ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 92, PROJECT NO. 4)."
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CASE NO. 94-17, LENTSCH Council acknowledged an application from Mr. Bill Lentsch for the
rezoning of Outlot B, Mendota Woods from HR PUD to R-1, along
� with an associated memo from Public Works Director.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the Kensington Manor Home
Association will not take a vote on granting access to the site &om
Brookside Lane until September 23, and suggested that no action on
the rezoning should be taken until all questions are resolved.
Councilmember Krebsbach moved to ta.ble discussion on the matter
to October 4.
Councilmember Smith seconded. the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
CASE NO. 9423, Council acknowledged an application from Metro II for pazking
METRO II variances to allow four stalls fewer than required by ordinance and
to allow a parlcing stall width of 8'6" for it,g facility located. at 1300
Mendota Heights Road Council also aclaiowledged a letter of
intent from Mefro II with respect to current and future pazking needs
and preservation of green space, along with reports &om the City
Planner and Administrative Assistant. Ms. Joanne Chabot,
Executive Director of Metro II, was present for the discussion.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he has visited the site and is
concemed that the only sireet access to the site is from the pazking
lot and to a fenced in play azea on the east side of the building is
from the parking lot. He asked if the play azea can be moved furkher
to the north of the building. He also expressed concern about the
ability of school buses to make their turns because of the island
projections.
y
; �
Page No. 4131
September 6,I1994
Ms. Chabot responded that it will be located very cl�
entryway sidewalk and cannot be moved any closer
sidewalk which runs along the building from east to
explained that school buses will drop the children oi
door. Regarding school buses, she stated that the sc:
a bus drive through the lot about a month ago and it
getting in and out. She further stated that the island:
reduced in size since the bus driver tried it even thoi
that he had no trouble. She informed Council that 1:
stalls are included within the 116 stalls on the site, b
stalls aze only available to staff. She explained that ;
pazking is needed in the future a curb cut can be mac
Mendota Heights Road. She stated that this proof oi
parking was done at the request of the Planning Con
informed Council that the turn azound has already be
when the Northland expansion began, part of the par
so Metro II removed the island that had prevented ci
lot.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that one troublesome aspei
the variance is that Mefro II is requesting a pazking p
tlie building. He stated that while Metro II and the sc
only utilize 24,0{?0 square feet of the building and thE
116 stalls is adequate, the building contains 40,000 s�
change in tenant mix or use of the building could cre�
demand for pazking. He stated that Council granted 1
district a three year special use permit to run some of
including extended day care, at the Metro II building
foolhardy to grant the variances without knowing the
the building. He suggested that Council could grant �
use permit based on the use of 24,000 square feet so 1
tenant mix changes and there is a greater d�mand for
Council could address the matter by informing Metro
conditional use permit would be in jeopazdy.
Ms. Chabot stated that she understands from city staf
contacting others in the indusfrial park that the reque;
are not uncommon. She explained that Metro II has i
employees, many of whom aze part-time, and most w
working by the time the extended day children aze pi�
parents between four and six o'clock p.m. She stated
II and school district uses are very consistent with ea�
stated that employees will arrive between 7:00 and 8:
students in the Meiro II program arrive at about 8:15
of about 36 people - and leave by 3:45. She stated th
se to the front
►ecause of the
uvest. She
' at the front
.00l disirict had
�ad no difficulty
have been
;h he indicated
basement
�t the basement
along
ssion. She
created -
g lot was lost
�ation in the
, of approving
m variance for
�ool district
i feel that the
.ia,re feet and a
;e a higher
.e school
ts Pmgrams,
nd it would be
atimate use of
conditional
at if the use or
II that the
and from
ed variances
�ly 30
1 be done
�ed up by their
hat the Metro
i other. She
0 a.m. and
a maximum
:in concept
Page No. 4132
September 6, 1994
she has no problem with a conditional use permit if Metro II is being
treated the same as others in the business park.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the pazking requirement for the
building has changed because when Contel owned it they used for
pazking part of the land Metro II opted not to purchase from �
Northland, so there has been a change which makes Metro II
different from other buildings in the pazk. Also, the building is not
new conshuction and Metro II is not the first owner, and the Contel
parking was predicated on using 24,000 square feet but now the
building will not be a single use sfructure.
Councilmember Krebsbach asked if the parking spaces proposed
will be wide enough so that car doors will not be damaged.
Councilmember Smith stated that the visitor stalls will be 8'6" rather
than the required 9' and she is concerned about the proposed width
for visitors and pazents picicing up their children.
Ms. Chabot responded that there will provide plenty of room for
door opening on the stalls next to the handicapped spaces and those
are the ones people will use when picking up their cluldren. She
further stated that the 15 minute spaces ha.ve not yet been defined
but will likely be near the handicapped spaces. She stated that at the
time of day when pazents come the lot will be so empty that people
will not pazk close to each other if they are concerned about their
ability to get in and out of their vehicles or about getting scratches
on their caz doors.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that if the square footage use of the
building should expand, the pazking could become a problem. He
pointed out that there were 120 spaces aai�.Metro II has proposed
removing some of them to provide space for a play area. He stated
that a conditional use pernut would make it known why the parking
deviates from all of the other buildings in the business pazk. He also
pointed out that although the plan shows a curb cut, none will be
allowed.
Ms. Chabot responded that Metro II does not want a curb cu� She
stated that she came to Council asking for a variance and the
solution now being discussed has not been considered by Metro II's
legal counsel. She asked that the matter be continued to that she can
discuss it with her counsel.
Councilmember Smith stated that she would be much more in favor
of the variances if there were not the potential for so much greater �-
CASE NO. 89-26,
ISD-197 ;
1
,
a
Page No. 4�33
September 6, 1994
use of the building than what Metro II is using. She pointed out that
what Metro II is trying to protect is what Council is hying to guazd
against.
It was the consensus of Council to continue the matter at the request
of the applicant. I
Council acknowledged a letter from Independent School District 197
for continuation of its conditional use permit for two temporary free-
standing wood fiame classrooms at the Mendota. Elementary School.
Council also acknowledged an associated report froin the Public
Works Director. �
Ms. Lois Rockney, Director of Business Affairs for
district, stated that the district is requesting continu�
yeaz conditional use permit granted by the city in 1 S
to a question from Mayor Mertensotto, she stated th
School was connected to public sewer and water an�
system was installed. The temporary classrooms w�
connected, however they were connected to the sch<
system. She stated that the buildings are intended tc
hopefully for two to three more years. She explaine
children move in and out of the classrooms and use
building for physical education and lunch, etc. She
rooms aze very close to the entrance to the main bui:
received no complaints about them.
he school
ion of the five
39. Responding
t the Mendota
a sprinkler
�e not
�l's fire alarm
be temporary -
l that the
ie main
tated that the
iin� and she has
� Councilmember Krebsbach stated that if the permit � s extended she
± feels the school district should make some improvements to the
� buildings. She further stated that she would not be 'interested in
; approving any future pernut extensions. I
Councilmember Smith asked what the expected life `of the temporary
buildings is. �
Ms. Rockney responded that it is anticipated that they would not be
used for more than 10 years although the expected life for this type
of structure is 15 yeazs. �
After discussion, Councilmember Krebsbach mov to grant a five
year extension to allow Independent School District 197 to utilize
their existing temporary classrooms at Mendota Elementary School
as per City Resolution No. 89-87, "RESOLIJTION �PROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR TEMP
CLASSROOMS."
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 26, 1994
T0: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Case No. 94-23: Metro II - Variances
DISCIISSION
Ms. Joanne Chabot, Executive Director for Metro II, located at
1300 Mendota Heights Road, appeared at a public hearing before the
Planning Commission at their August meeting to request two parking
variances. They are 1) a four stall variance to the required
number of parking spaces and 2) a parking stall size variance to
allow a parking stall of S'6". Please see attached Planner's
Report and Application.
At the meeting, Ms. Chabot produced a proof-of-parking plan
that does not disturb the playground area that will be established
by Independent School District 197's Community Education program
(see attached). The Planning Commission was concerned about two
items:
1. The calculated net usable office area as a percentage of
the total building area.
2. The appropriateness of the proposed stall width of 8'6"
given the uses in this building. �`�.
Ms. Chabot discussed in detail within the Planning Commission
the function and uses of the tenants in the building. Please refer
to August Planning Commission minutes for details of this
discussion. The current use of the building by Metro II and its
tenant f its the building as it was constructed by Contel . Both the
previous occupant and Metro II use significant space for ma.inframe
computers and computer labs that decrease the percentage of usable
office space.
Staff has conducted a site visit and has determined that the
Metro II and School District net usable office area does not exceed
the�reported 24,000 square feet.
t �4
f RECO�ATI4N ,
i
I
The Planning Commission voted unanimously (6-0) to close the
� public hearing. The Planning Commission voted unanimousZ� (6-0) to
Irecommend that City Couricil approve a proof-of-parking var�ance for
�our stalls and a parking stall �ize variance to a11ow 8" 6!' stalls�,
j subject �a investigation by Ci�y 'staf� to con�irm the amaunt of
i usable �o�fice area. ; - --
� ACTION RE4IIIRED
(
� Meet with the applicant. If the Ca.ty Council d sires to
, implement the Plannin.g Commission'� recammendation, �h y should
� pass a�motion to approve a proof-of-parking variance for four
� stalls �and a parking sta11 �ize variance to allow 8'6" stalls.
� i
KLB:kkb �
: . �
i
� � .
;
�
a
: � = � ~ .`
, � fI � ;
i , �
�
_ .�
i
Case Number: 94-23 � August 18, 1994 Page 2
accommodate enough parking in this area. to meet the full requirements ofthe buitding.
The applicant did not show this area as proafof parking and is asking for � variance to the parking
requirement. The variance request also would cover the dimension of the parking stali which has
been reduced from 9 ft. to 8.5 ft. in width. � •
Notice has been mailed to all properiy owners wiihin 100 ft. of Metro II, and the Planning
Commission should canduct a public hearing. _..• `
Parking Variances
The propased pa.rldng iayout shows a rearganized parking Iot with ciarcular parking aisle pattern tba,t
is created by removing a portion of the Iaudscape median in the center of ths pazking area.. The lot
is proposed to be resurfaced and striped with a parking stall dimension being 2Q ft. x 8.5 ft. This
allows a mvummum effiiciency of the �xisting gaved area on the site. Aithough a building plan was not
submitted, it is noted on the site plaa that there are 12 underground parki�ag stalls with entrance an
the wesi er�.d of the building. Totai pravided parking on ihe plan is 116 sl:alls. The agplicant also is
noting tt�aat the net usable office area is 24,000 s.£ This would require 120 stalls, thus they are short
4�s v+lhich they are aPPlying for as a variauce. r. _
The gross building area is noted as 42,000 s.� and ihe net usabte is 24,0�0 s.£ By this calculation, �
there appeazs to be a large amount of unusable area in the building which has not been delineated ar -'
accounted for sn the request. We know that some pa�rking is Iacated on the bottom floar, and we
would assume that the parldng floor takes up anly a third to a half'of the building's ground level floor.
Ciarification of the building's �zsable area should be fizrther discussed for the purpose of calculating
the parldng.
It is cominan in granting a variance to identify areas of proof ofparking if they e�ais� There is such "
an area an the east end of the bu�ding whic� is Iarge enough ta accommodate a singte raw of parlang
out to Mendota Road. Tb.e applicant is proposing to place a day care playground in this area.
Aithough the playground reqaires the s+�ting of footin,gs far play equipment, #he overall improvement
is typically not considered penrnan�t in nature. Its re�noval or relacation is possible shouki additional
pazking be required by increased use ofareas within the building.
Based on 24,000 s.£ af usable are�, 136 parking stalls will generally meet the normal parking �
requirements mast of the time for that amount of space. The variance of 4 stalls will not create an �"
unsa£e or defximental condition an the subject praperiy ar adjacent properties. Should the usable
space incre�ase within the building, the issue of pazking then becomes more�acute.
The slight reduction of one half' foot width af the parking stall, i� a camman parking design used -
today to m4�ximiz.e effia.encies withui parking lats. Generally, autas are smaller than they were 10-15
years ago, when most of the parking standazds were incorgorated into azdinance. Alsa, we have _.,,,
found that for office use where cars typically sit in the parking stall all day 1ong, a nar�ower stall is :°
quite suitable. Fo "r commercial activiiy, a wider s1�11 is needed far e��sy and convenient movements '_ �r
for h�gh turnover parking. - '` " _ .
, '• ' i
�
�
i
Case Number: 94-23 August 18, 1994
,
Action � . .
i
Conduct public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council.
Considerations �
;
� 1. Confirm usable office area. within subject building.
{
2. Provide area for pxoof of pazking.
� �
I .
i
;
�
�
i
i
f
, •
�
;
; .
I
�
,
1
i
1
;
: ;
;
, 1 I, -
�
�
Page 3
. —..-. . ' f ' .y � a •
"� _ + I . � i= -` _ :.;.� ' x
W' �'�' � :<:: " n �
- .r:»...
� �� O '� � � —� ;e y=
r� � ACA IA pApK � _ -- � i
�"' • ' __' � � \
'� { • •' _- _ _= i
E• E ER � i'�' �
P� • � �- '�
�. ` . �� _ �_ � Q'E UR E=C�,ION
`�� O • , � � _ =� ' �
�iA� --- a - .,. ""r _.. .x.._.
- _`..��...�� _ _.,
� • .. ' .� �= �'�' �
t � - 2,, - �:...�: �'+.�
- ' �,_,_ � � ` _ � C E hi E ii Y
.;,�.. � lE MAY i � ! /
: •
- . . 'l � i � -
x `1 � i � ' . • . . • � i � ' ��
'�. �... , ' � . , ""' ��.,. . _ �y+usatuw �
��` `� , � - � � ' . Y �M • • �}- �
� �r- . r �r � �� s • 1 �'jC� i �
Ji' � • � ;' � �
' ,. / ti �
•
� s • 3 �� )
� / �-
—� ��'� ' ;�� �; . 1 � � � + ;—" — — =
r � _- _ �
2 �
• ��Z ��•j• � . /
� � r ,}� - j . � l , '�.,��
� � � t
�
� � ' � ",''�� � � ' �
' p 1
� , • ��. �J � ,�' . !
_' i�jj % � .I . � •
1 s •
' � ��� � * S I • j(�
i . ��Y i I � j
t �. Y '
:f �"�` � � �� ' �' �""_.
' �'i,"" � � . � .
- • � A ME ROAO `
i *,Z,O � � � rr : � , w
. 1 �► �`�" , I 4:��.�.���� > .
�j • � � , i , J = � � � �—.,
� � � � � � SUB E
, �i� � � TMlANO J CT PR�}PERTY
�' . : ,,,. � � a .
� � .
' � �� � NORTN �
�
. . ,
r te^ �
---��� `�- �� tT,ns .o.,� � SCALE 1 8�0
� :_ � .•-.:. :r °_`` ' - _T.'�'_.`_'` ^ —
, - ,•. •ti�`:. � •,C,;''••�;�•'� :i. . .-�.-r, . . .
, . .. . . . - . . .
' iy • : • • ". • : i : : :: :-:J: . • ' . •: : - ' � : • '- �"-t-�-.�--'---r? . .. ."'_""'-r .
' �• . . . ; 1',.:�v��,�•••. ' " ' �`:�1�i� - � ...._....s.�...� , ',,.•.. .. • "'" , ,, :,,.%! ' ,
��� �: +.�.� - �'c . , • .. .� :_t.. .. . .�� TT:'�'�+� .�
' � - . �r�ws � �•"}�� �.s `�-+�--^�i:�
• ' • � ,�.� • � `„� . . . .� .•-�.�is �yT..+.�..n�.yr-.-+�:: �
{ ' y .. w.. '.�. � . .' r .. �.• i ` • _ . _ .
; f � �
; � � __..�� / ' —
� �
� i �..
� �� �
1300 Mendota Heights Road
(
,
�
�
August 1, 1994
METR0,1I'
Mendota Heights, MN 55120-1158 Telephone (612)686-6800 FAX
TO: City of Mendota Heights
FROM: MET O II
J e Chabot, Executive Director
-RE: Letter of Intent and Variance Request
� •
, j .
�
METRO II purchased the GTE facility at�1300 Mendota Heig
on December 27, 1992. It was METRO II's belief at the t
purchase that the parking lot, which contained approxima
spaces, was located wholly on the property it acquired.
It was discovered through survey work in September 1993 th,
parking lot was located in part on a separate lot that GTE
to United Properties for a new Northland Insurance Company
building.' The new Northland facility is currently being
constructed on this lot, leaving METRO II with a parking l�
does not contain enough parking to meet current code
requirements. ,
METRO II is required to have 120 parking �spaces based on t�
current requirements for a building with 24,000 us�ble squ�
feet. METRO II has formulated a parking lot reconstructioi
which will provide 116 parking stalls.
; �
A variance is being requested for 4 parking spaces. METRO!
plans: 1) preserve green space for both aesthetic and '
environmental reasons, 2) save taxpayer dollars, 3) prov�
enough parking to meet current needs and future growth for
METRO II and its tenant, District 197, and 4) call for a
negligible variance while at the same time allowing METRO 7
District 197 to provide necessary public services.
. � � -
M Equal Opportunky Employet
Road
of
� 170
t the
sold
t that
. plan
II's
de
both
I and
1Viendota
C ity o�
Heights
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
Case No. `�'-
Date of Ap lication — — �1
Fee Paid -C�O J �
ApplicantName: �habot Joanne PH: 686-2201
(1-ast) (F"ust) (Ni�
Address: 1300 Mendota Hei�hts Road, Mendota Hei�hts, MN �55120
(Number & Street) iC�t3') (State) (ZiP)
Owner Name: tiETRO I I
(Last) (F'ust) (M�
Address: 1300 M ndn � H ights Road. Mendota He�ghts. MN 55120
(Number & Saeet) (Cit}►) (state) C�P)
StreetLocation of Property in Question: l�00 MPndota HeightG Road
Legal Description ofProperty: L�y,t 1� B�.00�1� � Men�ot�e3 ��+*� TnA�t�tri al Park
1�+pe of Request:
Rezoning
Conditional Use Permit •
Conditional Use Permit for P.0 D.
Plan Approval
Compreheasive Pian Amendmeut
g Variance
Subdivision Approval
Wctlands Pemnit
Other (attach explanation)
:
Applicable City O�dinance Number Section
Present Zo�ng.caf•Propert� Present Use �
Ptnposed Zoning of Property : Proposed Use
I hereby declan that a1i statements made in this request and on the �dditional
materiai are frue. .
. � ,
(S' of Applic�
. �
' (�ate)
(Received by - Title) ..
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1V�N • 55118 452 • 1850
CITY OF N[ENDt3TA HEIGBTS
TO: �; Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawe11, City Adminis�.
October 14, 199�
SIIBJBCT: Pente]. Consultan�, Contract Extensions
DISCUSSZON
�
Ori March 1, 1994 the Gity Council authorized retair
recognized experts to assist u� in analyzing the Pentel
tower application. As Council will recall., both Mr. Gec
Jillson and Mr. John DuBois have condu.cted their analyse
have at�ended two recent City Council mee�ing� to preser
findings. As such, their obligations to the City under
original contracts are now complete.
two
f rey
and
their
heir
Council will. also recail �rom our last meeting that�Mr.
Jillson was asked specifically to analyze a new antenna tower
concegt which invalves placing the structure on the rooflof Ms.
Pent�el's home. This will involve additianal time and e�ense
for Mr. Jillson and he has asked for formal authorizatian to
proceed tgee attached letter dated October 13, 1994}. �
Curren� fee schedules for Mr. Jillson and Mr. Dubois are
attached. Should Council desire additional participation from
one or both of these individuals in the further ana3ysis�of Ms.
Pentel's an�enna tower, an additional budget allo�ation shoul�d be
approved. Such extension should probably be based on a�'�ime
plus ma�erials" basis at a cos�. no� ta exceed some set f�gure.
,
ACTZON REQII�RED
i
Council should consider an ex�.ension of Mr. Geof�
Jillson.'s {Guy Engineering} andjar Mr. Jahn Dubois con
contracts wa,th the City to anaZyze the Pentel antenna
proposal.
�
�
tant
er
�
GUY
E N G I N E E R I N G
CORPORATION
1002 Mainstreet
Hopkins, MN 55343
612-933-6161
City Of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
ATTN: Mr. Tom Laweil
RE: Mendota Heights Radio Tower, Sylvia Pentel, Application
Guy Engineering File: 94-002-024
MECHANICAL
STRUCTURAL
GEOTECHNICAL
MACHINES
FORENSIC
October 13, 1994
Please be advised that this office has reached the amount of billing which was previously ag�eed
to at 52500.00. Accordingly, please find attached billing for services in that amount. Please ad-
vise us as to how to proceed beyond this point. If you should wish us to do further review
regarding the application, please contact this office at your convenience to discuss.
Thank you for the opportunity to work with you in this matter.
Respectfully,
��o����,� C�� ;����
Geoffrey G. Jillson, PE
Principal
GG.�:J
\
i
7320 GALLAGHER DRIVE
SUITE 1188
EDINA, MN 55435
i
JOHN R. DuBOIS
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATIONS
CONSULTING ENGINEER
February 5, 1994
Mr. Thomas Lawell
Mendota Heights City Administrator
Mendota�Heights City Hall
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr: Lawell:
This letter is a follow-up, as promised, in our telephone conv
February 3, 1994. Enclosed is a copy of my professional resume t
describes the engineering tasks, similar to those requir�d by you,
accomplished over the past thirty years. As the resume indicatE
independent Registered Professional Engineer and have never worl
manufacturer or supplier of radio apparatus, nor do I sell a
communications equipment.
)NE (612) 835-7657
(612) 835-3540
�rsation on
hat briefly
that I have
s, I am an
ed for any
�y type of
I have specifically done work on amateur radio tower conflict and i�nterference
for the City of Lakeville, Minnesota (Mr. Robert Erickson, City Admi�nistrator),
City of Burnsville, Minnesota (Ms. Linda Gloor, Technical Services G�oordinator)
and the City of Edina, Minnesota and others.
I work on a time-and-materials basis type contract up to an agreed-u'pon not-to-
exceed amount, with my professional services billed to you at $60 p`er hour and
my necessary expenses at their actual cost, plus automobile mileage�associated
with my services to you at $.23/mile. After you have reviewed my res�me and this
letter, please call me at (612) 835-7657 if you would like me to meet with you
in your office to discuss your needs further (no obligation of course for this
introductory visit). I have worked on several situation tt�at are very similar
to the position that you related to me on February 3rd. Experiencelwith other
clients has demonstrated that my professional service cost far less than the
money saved and the results achieved using my technical assistan�e are very
positive. �
I look forward to working with you in the near future.
;
Yours sincerely,
/v i
ohn R. DuBois Ph.D.
egistered Professional Communications Engineer
innesota Registration #7350
; 1
� �
I • OZ/24/94 14: 54 F.� 612 933 3436 GUY ENGINEERING -+�+-► MENDOT� HEIGHTS � t�106 '�
. .�- . .. . _. • _ . _ . • � � • . .
, - -• . . =; .;' •�s. . .... -• , , . .. .
- -- . , ._� :—.
� �������•- -- ' ' • • MECHA.NECAL
. . . ._ - . ,
• . ... =
- : '• • STRUCTURAL
. . . .. . =
. ;--- • ;•�{:� .. '. . . ' ' • GE�TE'C'HNICAL
• � � • M•ACHINES
, . .. .
, -': ,;ENG[IVEER•IN.G • , . FOR•ENSIC
• ..
,. �. _.. . C O R P O. R•A:T:t.O,IV . . ... .
, ... 'IDQ2 Mains�'eet � . .� :.. . .. . .... • • . ' • . • - •
... • ._ • ::Hopkine:.MRt 55343' � . . . • ' • ' ••� • • '
' ,� _.. . ... . '• ..
.. .. • 612�33-�'�6t:'•.'•:'.'_..`.
•- • . .::;_= • ••'•' ' • .
.':' ' . .•- ',' 1. ..- • •;�_„ .. . •• . .. . . .
' ._: ..- -. -FE�SCHEQUL•EAND•CONDRfONS=1994 �� ._ '
'- ' :� :' ' . . • • -
Q /�C M�.Mi•': �-�r�-i::��_ ' r ..
• ] . . _ • • ._f��i['L7�7KIiViL S�VjirCJ' ' ' . . . . .. . . . . . . .
._� .=si°�— • .s�_y. :��o " • • .
'f . • ' ' .�. ' � . . . ,
. .. . �..' '
• =:-•• • - •Prindpa! Fngineerl.Consulting'S85.00-/ht. . ' .... . . .
t .
- _ ' ' :` '. � S,taff'Tectinii�an Qr=Fe[d'En9inee� S5I:5Q /hr • , - . .
- _ --• Adcnin�sttativelRepo2 Prd,cess : : $37.50 Ru' • • . ..
-, :� . . ''Ft�,tait;�, •NGnim[im:.Paym�i�t�s.quoted . ... `' �' ' ' . . .
. -'::.. ,• � 'p�ir�cipaLEn9u�r'!%stimorty • $i2Q.00Jbr (see-condiBon 12} .
.�• .. . .
" ... _ : •_z.s' s'. .'.� ..... • . ' . ... • _ _ ' . . .
. . • • _ • G/1`G)S�' ...: . . - .. ' ' � � � . •
. _�� — •z .
. ' :i:�s� �_ "s_.+_ , • ' •
. . 'r __ _ �10i70¢fdQfilC.(i.fO�I X 2"CdpIPS} •�Q$.� ' , ' .
-s:_= --;::'=V:GR.f�pe's;=S.7.5.0.0.pertape�:additionat covies 835.00iea. • . _ ,. .
�9 Y � D� ��
... �,-_ � _ i;�= -'Plwto��a� � errierrts b s . , . .
• :• • Auio•Mleage��a:35/rt�:'• � • "
�:_. •
• '.•'_ : -,Ev'tdecxe�ttia�idlicEg=(mintrr�urn.fee); S25.QQ. . , .
_�• _••-•. �_:°=�;Evid�St�g�: _�miaunumt'S25.00.pec.mor�th. •• , .
. z;. Ot�ec: Vavel; •iortQ;d"►srance:calls, exliibit, materials •'shippt�g,
' :. . .. ' .. subcor►tiacted.services.. etc. • •Ot�• �ost + 1596 . . ' . ' . ._ .
. _ ... . ...• • :- ....
t t.�:�. - CONDiiIONS:�: - . ; _ •"` ., _ _.. .: �..:. . . .
' . �. _, , , ; ,
_,,:
�i' L ' . . ..... . .
•• '-, ;1. . A1Ctiine is 'rnea's�iFed Doital ta'portal. •Tr�vet'outside oi the Twin t�ties Metro area may be billed at a redttced
- ' : . . . travei rate: - .,� . � _ _ ; _ , .. . .... .. .
� •—. . - _ , .- •� _ � - • . .,. • • ..
_ . �
_ ••" Z: . Retainer, mirumum paymeni:��wilt be credtted s�sinst F,nat Irn►oice. �' ... _ .
��� �� •3. Unless'ottiecwise agr.eed.ta irt•writing, tfie'ctiecst' is the person to wham the caver, fetter is addressed along with
� : their.ert►ptoyer if it is included as part of the,dient's sddress. The ind'nr7dual diertt warrants his er her acahority to
• , biiid,tt�e•principat_ if �one or more other parties are to be responsibl�, each mcrst sig� a copy of the cover Eetter
and_eac��ya�ac�xnent page and ret�an them to the.Guy Engineerinp Corporation office. (n 'the e�erit respoRsibiltty
,„�:: _ t_. �%�,i?ie�roject cEi�nQes;t�a�ds, ar in the evertt of a change of personnel, ne eMity is reCce�ed of t�e n:spons�ifity
. . . . -.._ -- iivitJiout:t[.�e.wriuec� app�oval of Gvy Engineerirt8 CarPordtion. - � ,
.. _.�, . •::.;_- ••., ... ._�,,-- ` -•" . , . _ � � .
'�.. �: 4_ _"�•'•Iri tfie'evern the �ind'nrii�i�ai addressee is employed by a puhlic agency and tt�at agency is to be responsib[e, the in-
.. :. ,,T�duai add�esse�vKarra� his o�•� aWwrity te bicrd the publie agency �mless othervvise stated in wiaing ar un-
m
.. , � • -�- -= j'iess.iha'agceesrientis eicecvted bythe appropriate autt�arity- . . .
' ��= �: � �'�,-=- : •• ' :,..;�_�_;_,-- .-u:.. . ..... - .. , . � .
.,
' ";_, 5., �•The cl'e�nt is responsible �"or paying ati�fees and�expenses of G,uy Engineering Corporation related tfl the er+gag�
-. �meQt: This st�all;icdudeactivities in response to d�scavery eiforLs'by ott►Qr parties. As s Covrtesy, if the client
� ,::,.. :•.... wishes, 'Guy_ 6�gineenn�Cocparat;on wilt 6�'II opposing parties for the time arfd acgenses invotved s'n respoeding m
.. ... .��d,scovery.=-Cted"rt w�[• be=giveri.iar payments �eCEtved pursuartt ia ihis blfmg: .'
i.._ ,_ ,__. -. . :. . . •• _• •_= • ... . ..
�j .•-•. &. •='• T�ps•••requirinp ovemigi�t stays,w�I be b1[ed for �ime spent on the project 6eiween 8:00 a.m. artd 6:00 p.m., or
I, : _ ' _such Areatef �rrie as •is actvally'worked and braveled. . . ..
_..r. . ..
° ., _. -: " 7_ ':.�'Guy►.,Engir�eering' Corporation� reserves the• right to bilf Iost or wasted time in the eveM of a cancellation, whether
�� • •• . �'== � .._;the•cancellauon=rs caused by.�the ct�errt or �e;vpposing side. • •
� ., . . _ ,;...__..._ . __ .. .. . • _ - .. ..
.. - _ • . . . ., ...
. • . .:,r:z_' ' c _:•' _ .
..,: • 8:, ::"•-F�ees arid' :expenses may_be, billed monthty or as vme and experues accrue, uniess otf�e� arrangerr�ents are made
; _ , _ : ;: ••_�_ with Gujr__Enginee�if►g� Corpoiatior� _.. ' ..
� ' .. Lt � i�� � � . ��. . . . . � • _
' •. • = _' ..,;_9. • �Ha�es.acesubjectto•charige.an a catendar.year basis wiritiout�other•ciouce.
' `. . ' • _ �' -- . •-- - _.... , . .__. ._ . . . . � � .
.. .. - . . _=----- - '_:, - . , .. •
� . ' • �• _'-- :.. a � .'�'; .. � ' , . . ': : ' - -• • , . " .
. - :-- -• • .. _ .. .. . . . ,
-- '; '.�: - -- � ' • .._.._ . • • • . , _ .
� •-- •• - —� ` ...__ .;�. � _ . . . „ .. -
. . .- _'_ • • ....--..�.s" . - ._ • :;. . . . • . - � � ... . •
• .S" � .' . � .. i ' ... �
,
Oct 18+1994 02�15PM FROM LAW OFFICES
JONN B. BELLOWS. .JR.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
t
�
October 18, 1994
Mr. Eric J. Nystrom
Winthrop and Weinstine
3200 Minnesota World Trade Center
30 Seventh Street E
St. Paul, MN 55101
TO 94528940
Q �;�
�� �el
600 CAPIT/►� CENTR£
386 WAB�►SHA STREET NORTH
SI11NT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102
{612) 22'7•Sj751
RE: Sylvia Pentel v. City of Mendota Heights
Court File No: 3-91-123
Dear Mr. Nystrom:.
At the request of Mayor Mertensato and tha Counci]
inquired as to the availability of roaf towers c
supporting an antenna for amateur radio purposes. M�
indicates that there are two manufacturers of such towe
Design Company, Ltd. and Glen Martin Engineering.
understanding that Create Dcsign Company, Ltd. is a
company whose main U.S. dealer is Electronic Dis
Corporation at 325 Mill Street, Vienna, virqinia 221
Martin Engineering is located at Rt. 3, Box 322,
Missouri 65233.
The tallest tower available through Create Design is tl
CR45 - a 14 foot 9 inch tower base to top. Accordi
manufacturer, this tower xill withstand �,90 mp
Unfortunately, Create Design was unable to prc
informaticn as to the enqineering data supporting the
Furthermore, their toNers do not have any radial ice ra�
�
,
The tallest Glen Martin Engineering roof tower is :
inches base to top. This tower is rated as handling 1:
of a�tenna at 85 mph. Again, the manufacturer was
provide any engineering data supporting their claim anc
no calculations as to the capability. of the toWer
conditions of radial ice.
Notwithsta�dinq the absence of engineering data as
towers, it should be noted that the tallest of the tvo
17 feet 5 inches. This tower'together with the heic
Pentel's h�me would only yield a height of 40 feet.
is a! height inadequate for reliable amateur commu
Based� upon the information available, it does not app
, I have
�pable of
research
�s : Create
It is my
Japanase
.ributor's
�0. Glen
�oonville,
�eir model
zg to the
i winds.
vide any
ir claim.
:ings .
7 feet 5
sq. feet
snable to
had made
xnder the
to these
towers is
it of Ms.
orty feet
�ications.
ar that a
� ..
Oct 18+1994 02�15PM FROM LAW OFFICES TO 94528940 p,�3
�,
�
Mr. E=ic J. Nystrom
october 18, 1994
Page Two
roof-mounted tower is comme=cially available �hich would permit
reascriably reliable atnateur comraunicatians.
Yours truly,
JOHN $. BELLOWS, JR.
JSB:tal
Cc: Ms. Pen'�eZ
Mendota Heights - T. Lawell, City Adminis�rator �
',
� i 1
M�
From: ;
Subject: ,
i i�i i � � : C
f 1� 1
Octaber 4, 1994
Mayor, City Council and City Adminis�r''ait
Kevin Batchelder, Administr�tive As i�
Request to Acquire Curley Site
DISCUSSIUN
i
Inithe August 26, 1994 Bi-'Weekly Synopsis, I reported that City staff had
discussions with Mr. St��art Nolan and Ms. I{:risten Iarson Rieser, of St��art Corp{
about their attempts to acqaire and develop the Curley site. At that time, staff inc
the prefeneci methad of re-cleve2oping the Curley site was through private acquisi�
development. (Please see attached August 26 Synopsis.)
Stuart Corporation is interested in developing the site for Dakota County ;
and has inquired in their attached October 3, 19941eitex if ihe City is willing to �
a taking of this property. Stuart Corporation has not irtdicated what land uses or
tenants would occupy the balance of the pmperty, if Dakota County State Bank c
as the developer.
�
This item is on your agenda to discuss the request by Stuart Corporatian t
willingness of the City to proceed with a t��king of the Curley property under our
eminent domain.
ACTION REQi7]RE])
,
��
Discuss the request by Stuart Carporation about our willingness ta proceed
taking of this pmperiy and pravide st��ff with direction on the apprapriate respanse.
� ,
I
r
ed that
and
ate Bank
x:eed with
hich
x�ses them
a
; the
of
ST'UART COMPANIES
October 3, 1994
Mr. Kevin Batchelder
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
RE: Curley Property
Dear Kevin:
I am disappointed to inform you that we have been unable to reach an agreement with Tom Curley regarding
the pwchase of his site. He had re-opened negotiations and requested that we make another offer based on
the additional information regarding the size of his land. We had complied with that request, yet I have not
received any type of response from him and the response date has long expired.
This property is situated on a key intersection and is clearly a blight on the City. It would serve a strong
public purpose to implement eminent domain and create a visually attractive neighborhood center which is
needed for the area. This need will further increase with the upcoming opening of the Mendota Bridge. It is
most evident that no one has been able to deal with G�rley and acquire his site in a reasonable economic
transaction. Between myself and the City, I believe we could count at least 12 other development flr�ns which
have worked diligently on this site, all to no avail.
This outcome is most unfortunate since we all know we have a quality user in hand. The Dakota County
State Bank is a prime anchor for any type of redevelopment in that area. If there is a willingness on part of
the City to proceed with the taking of this property, Stuart Corporation would certainly be interested in
working with you on that endeavor. �
I would appreciate a response outlining your interests in pursuing this property.
Sincerely,
STUART
Director
cc: Stiaart Nolan
7olin Seidel - Dakota County State Bank
�
300 Shepard Park Office Center ■ 2777 Youngman Avenue ■ St. Paul, Minnesota 55116-3048 (612) 698-0302 FAX (612) 698-0417
r
`.J�
�
�
From:
August 2&, 1994
Gity Council and Commission Members
Kevin Batchelder, Adminis�raCive Assis�ant
Subject: Bi-Weekly Planning Synopsis
DxS4'`U'SSICiI�T
S�a£€ has held a number of planning related meetings in the
last week since Jc�hn Uban'� regularly scheduled pre-application
meetinge. It has been a quite active summer �or plarining and
development issues. �
1. Curlev Site Dise�ssigas - Mr. Stuart No3an�and Ms
Larson Rieser, of Stuart Corporation, visited to di
Curley grogerty and thei.r attemp�s to acquire it
developrnent. Stuart Carp. has a bank that is inte
occupying the site, but a].so wanted to inquire ab
poten�.ial uses on the remainder of the si.te. The
inquired about City participation in �he acquisi�i
site and were tol.d that the City would prefex
acquisi�ion and development. The viaitars inquired
Increment Financing, utilitiea and roads, preferred ]
MnDQT participation and frontage road, and 9ite de'
Staff discussed neighborhaod impact, road and ait�
pay-as-you-go TIF, potential clean up costs �or th
development proposals. �
2.
Geaer�l Pumg - City staff has conducted three mee1
various representatives of General Pump sinee t
Increment Financing propasals wa� rejected by City C
August 16, 1994. Mike Chri�toferson is the owner a
Pump and Len Lilyholm is the architect. General Pun
to build a 54,000 square foot office/ware`house c
Northland Plaza. This aite ie zoned "I�� and i:
between 5-494, Northland Drive and Highway 55 on�
site. General Pump is curren�ly located in �he
xeights Business Park and emplays approximateiy 60 e
They manufacture and d�.stribute gumps and pump pari
1
Due to General Pump'� time schedule and need for an
facility, they desire to proceed direc�ly to City Cc
a building perm�.t review and avoid any variance
Council did no� desire to see laading dacks along F3
and desired be�.ter screening and landecaping. Staf�
meeting with General Pump to discuss ardinance req
and glan revisions to rneet City Council's requests�
Pump has submitted �orne revised plans to address
code and City Council requ.e.�ts and have indicated
�
;
Kristen
cuas the
�or re-
eated in
ut other
visitors
n of the
private
bout Tax
�nd uses,
�alition.
layout,
SOS and
ings wi�h
:heir Tax
:ouncil an
f General
�p desires
�n Lot 3 ,
� lacated
the MIST
� Mendata
mplo�ees.
�xpanded
�uncil far
s. Ci�y
ighway 55
' has been
uiremen�s
General
he zoning
they will
�
�
CITY OF biENDOTA HEIGHTS
i� •
TO: � Ma.yor and City Council
;
FROM: ' Tom Lawell, City Administ
SIIBJECT:
I
DISCiJSSION
October 13, 1994J
Discuss MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan Alternative
Environmental Document �
,
As you know, the MAC is currently in the process of �
an Alternative Environment Document (AED) for the L
Comprehensive Plan (LTCP) of MSP. It is this docume
describes the future expansion options at MSP inclu
possible future construction of additional runways and
facilities.
In the last few weeks the MAC has formally released f
review a draft copy of the LTCP AED. The document is appr�
200 pages in length and therefore has not been attached.
attached please find a copy of the document's ExecutivE
along with several other selected pages and graphics. Sl
be interested in seeing the full draft LTCP AED, let me ]
Of course, the major issue within the draft LTC:
interest to Mendota Heights is future runway constructi
document describes the differential impacts of adding a�
parallel runway at MSP vs. adding a new north/south run�
Cedar Avenue. While the summary seems to favor the constr
a new north/south runway, at this point there can..be no ae
given as to what MAC will ultimately decide. �•
A public hearing on this draft document has been sch�
the MAC for October 26, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. at Washburn Hig]
201 W. 49th Street, Minneapolis. The written comment peri
draft d'ocument is open through November 25, 1994. The
make a selection of the preferred alternative in Februar�
i
AIRPORT RELATIONS COl4Il�iISSION REVIEW
�
On` October 12th, the Mendota Heights Airport ]
Commission (ARC) discussed the draft LTCP AED and its impo:
the City of Mendota Heights. Because of its implication:
City's long term airnoise exposure prospects, the AR.0 fe:
cr�cial that we actively participate in the review of th:
. ,
�ng Term
it which
ling the
terminal
�r public
ximately
Instead,
Summary
ould you
now.
AED of
�n . The
ew north
ay along
.ction of
surances
duled by
School,
�d on, the
�lAC will
, 1995.
elations
�tance to
for our
t it was
s
� .
document. In addition, the ARC felt it was very impo
City to be represented by a large contingent at the up
hearing.
Issues identified by the ARC as being important in
AED include:
;
1) Air Traffic Growth Projections
3)
From the data provided in the document (Sect
pages� 36-37) , it appears as if the MSP Projec
Average Daily Traffic will total 1,328 aircrai
compares to a August 1994 average daily traffic
1,315 a-ircraft. Based on these numbers, is any �
at the present airport even necessary?
Accuracy of 1992 DNL Contour
The 1992 DNL Contour contained within the
(Figure 14) shows a DNL 65 contour which include
portion of Roger Lake neighborhood, all of B
Shores, and even a portion of Friendly Hil
previous 1992 DNL 65 contours provided to us b
showed a much smaller contour. Why the discre
Summary of Differential Impacts .
for the
public
the LTCP
:ion III,
:ted 2005
`t . This
count of
�xnansion
document
; a large
s. The
� the MAC
�ancv?
The Summary of Differential Impacts shown wi�thin the
document (pages iv-vi) note that some factors favor the
construction of a new north/south runway whi�e others
tend to favor construction of a new north parallel
runway. No attempt is made in the document o weight
which factors are more important than others.
The ARC recommended that these and additional issues be raised
at the upcoming public hearing. In addition, the Commission felt
the City should submit written comments to the MAC by thelNovember
25th deadline. `•
Lastly, the ARC recommended that the City inform �
noise impacted city residents to attend and participa
October 26th MAC sponsored public hearing. The next edit
Heights� Highlites will be ma.iled out on October 20th
include information on the issue along with an invitation
the upcoming public hearing.
ACTION REQIIIRED
Discuss the contents of the draft LTCP AED and ident�
issues the City should present at the upcoming public hear:
addition, Council members should make every effort to at
October;26th public hearing to underscore the importance
issue to our community.
, �
invite
in the
of the
d will
attend
fy those
.ng . In
tend the
of this
Welcome to .
��jnneapotis-St. p�ul
=r�te��aft�rat A�r�ur.f
,. r^�rt' .Ylti�i
,�• y1t 1 >�{3.{��}..
t ''
RYi�Y4��W?�� •� „i
•a«- i.r i+ L w..�w-•-• �� +. ��.�.. n
r .c e+ .: < -�+� !- - +r . S.a �
�.S+r �l .: i�• . -.�
� Y . y t' ^ �
,l��i .t ,� t� f c�,r
, .. __....._� � n�;��l«u:.�
��`-"r..'v-.'-..��#' ",r ..
) ,, F t
♦ � �.i 9 �� u � ' ,�`(i
(. R i�!�s3Y++4i f � �w�..� 1}{I
( � 7 ;
y !� ,_,.� ,, y� ( .•._.
.�
� I!Ip� M}y ('7 �
-��'«.�,.e..��'..�.� �m6`r��k,■
�
' •'. •. !^`xr �'�-�'�`�w.
i
��
1�
__
DRAFT ALTERNATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
,
�
• '
Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ............................
A. Purpose and Need for Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. Format of the Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. Backg�ound .......................................
T�
�
ALTERNATIVES . ........................................I......
A. General Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. Alternatives Under Consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. Alternatives Elimineted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D. Preferred Alternative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1 -
ISSUES ANDIMPACTS ..................................... ....
A. AirQuality ........................................ ......
A.1 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A.2 Impacts on Air Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. Archaeologicai Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.1 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8.2 Impacts on Archaeological Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B.3 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�. . . . . . . . . . .
C. Biotic Communities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
� C.1 Affected Envi�onment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C.2 impacts on Biotic Communities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
, C.3 Mitigation Measures (Biotic Communities) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O. Bird-Aircraft Hazards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
� D.1 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D.2 Impacts of Bird-Aircraft Hazards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
' D.3 Mitigation Measures (Bird-Aircraft Hazards) . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . .
E. Construction Impacts . , �, , , , , , ,
F. Endangered and Threatened Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . .
� F.1 Affected Envi�onment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `., . . . . . . . � . . . . . .
' F.2 impacts on Endangered and Threatened Species . . . �. . . . . . . i . . . . . .
' F.3 Mitigation Measu�es (Endangered and Th�eatened Species) . . . . . . .
G. Energy Supply and Natural Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � � . . . . . .
G.1 Affected Envi�onment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . .
� G.2 Impacts on Natu�al Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . .
H.' Floodplains .........................................�......
I. ' Historical/Architectu�al Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �
, .... ......
� 1.1 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
� 1.2 impacts on Historical/Architectural Resou�ces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
; 1.3 Mitigation Measures (Historicai/Architectu�al Resources) . . . . . . . . . .
i .
Draft AED - MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Plan
11-1
1
1
1
2
III-1
1
3
4
9
9
12
12
12
12
14
15
15
15
19
20
20
2�
21
23
23
23
23
24
24
25
25
27
28
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
;
K.
�
L.i
,
i
M.
N.'
O.
P•,
,
a.'
R.
�
S.!
LandUse ......................................... ....
J.1 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
J.2 Impacts .................................... .....
J.3 Mitigation Measures (Land Use) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noise........................................... .....
K.1 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
K.2 Noise Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
K.3 Mitigation Measures (Noise) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 4(f) Park and Recreation Lands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L.1 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L.2 Impacts on Section 4(f) Park and Recreation Lands . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L.3 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Socioeconomic..................................... .....
M.1 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
M.2 Socioeconomic Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
M.3 Mitigation Measures (Socioeconomicj . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TransportationAccess . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
N.1 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
N.2 Impacts of T�ansportation Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • C . . . . . .
Visual...........................................•�......
0.1 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . .
0.2 Visual Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . .
0.3 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . .
SurfaceWater Quality . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . .
P.1 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . .
P.2 Impacts on Surface Water auality . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . .
P.3 Mitigation Measures (Surface Water Quality) . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . .
Groundwater....................................... .....
Q.1 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . .
Q.2 Impacts on Groundwater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . .
a.3 Mitigation Measures (G�oundwater) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � • . . . . .
Wetlands. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � � . . . . .
R.1 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � • . . . . .
R.2 Impacts on Wetlands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( . . . . . .
R.3 Mitigation Measures (Wetlands) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .� . . . . .
Wildlife Refuge . . . . . . . . . . .
S.1 Affected Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :�. . . . . . . . . . . .
S.2 Impacts on Wildlife Refuge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S.3 Mitigation Measures (Wildlife Refuge) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ADVERSE IMPACTS WHICH CANNOT BE AVOIDED, SHORT-TERM USES AND LONG-
TERM PRODUCTIVITY AND IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS OF
RESOURCES ............................................. ...
IV.1 Adverse Impacts Which Cannot Be Avoided . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
fAlternative 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
IV.2 Short-Term Uses and Long-Term Productivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
IV.3 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
�
Oraft AED - MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Plan
.'��.'L�'.i-a
ui-Zs
. 28
. 29
. 31
. 31
. 31
. 31
. 44
. 46
. 46
. 49
. 49
. 49
. 49
. 51
. 54
55
55
56
58
58
59
59
59
60
62
66
�o
70
72
74
75
75
76
77
78
78
82
84
IV-1
1
2
2
�
�
LIST OF PREPARERS ......................................
f�
..... V-1
LIST OF AGENCIES, ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS TO WHOM DRAFT AED WAS
SENT........................................... ....
LIST OF REFERENCES ..................................... ....
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY .......................... ...
APPENDIX A -- LIST OF TECHNICAL REPORTS AND OTHER DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A.1 SURFACE WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS . . . . . •. � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A.2 NOISE CHp►RACTERISTICS, METRICS, COMPATIBLE LAND USE CRITE
A.3 CANADA GOOSE POPULATIONS ON MOTHER LAKE . . . . . . . . . . . .
A.4 EFFECT OF AIRCRAFT OVERFLIGHTS ON BALD EAGIES .........
A.5 FORSTER'S TERNS AND BALD EAGLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
APPENDIX B -- FIGURES 1 - 36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LIST OF TABLES
...... 1
TABLE 2 _ Receptor Site Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �. . . . . . . 3
TABLE 1 -
Existing and Projected Backg�ound CO Concentrations within the Study Are�a
(PPm) • 4
TABLE 3 - Existing•and•2020 Total (Annual) Emissions By.Alternative (tons/year). . . • � . . . . . . 5
TABLE 4- Existing and 2020 Carbon Monoxide (CO) i-Hour Average Concentrations• I
(mg/m31 ............................................... ...... 5
TABLE 5- Existing and 2020 Hydrocarbon tHC) 1-Hour Average Concentrations (/�g/m� 1..... 6
TABLE 6- Existing and 2020 Nit�ogen Oxide (NOx) 1-Hour Average Concentrations (Ng/m3) .. 6
TABLE 7- Existing and 2020 Sulfu� Oxides (SOx) 1-Hou� Average Concentrations (/�g/m3) .... 7
TABLE 8- Existing a�d 2020 Particulate 1-Hour Average Concentrations (/ig/m3 ..., I,,,,,, 7
TABLE 9- 2020 CO Emissions on Regional Highway Network i� Study A�ea ...... �...... 8
TABLE 10 - Existing and 2020 CO Concentrations at At-Grade Intersections (ppm) . �...... 8
TABLE 11 - Locations, Numbers and Types of Bird Strikes Reported at MSP, July 1990 to
October1993' ........................................... ...... 17
TABLE 12 - Estimated Annual Fuel Consumption in the Year 2020 (miliions of gallons) I......• 24
TABLE 13 - Land Use Compatibility Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
TABLE 14 - Population and Households Within Year 2005 DNL Noise Contours - Alternlatives
1 and 2 35
TABLE 15'- 2005 Projected Fleet.Mix.and•Ave�age Daily Arrivais . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i . . . . . . 36
TABLE 16 - 2005 P�ojected Fleet Mix and Average Daily . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . 37
TABLE 17 - Noise Sensitive Uses Within Year 2005 DNL Noise Contours - Alternatives�l and
2 � ............... i ..... 38
TABLE 18 � .Noise Impacts at Select•Noise Sensitive•Use.- Alternatives 1 and 2 . . . . ! . . . . . . 39
TABLE 19 - Population and Households Within Year 2005 DNL Noise Contours - Alternl tives
5and6................................................ ...... 41
TABLE 20 �- Noise Sensitive Uses Within Yea� 2005 DNL Noise Contours - Alternatives I5 and
6 1 ...............................�...................... ...... 42
i I
Draft AED - MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Plan
�
�
� '
i
t
;
LIST OF TABLES (CONT'D)
� Paae
TABLE 21 - Noise Impacts at Select Noise Sensitive Use - Alternatives 5 and 6........... 43
TABLE 22 - Section 4(f) Park and Recreation Lands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . 47
TABLE 23 - Population/Households Displaced . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . , 51
TABLE 24 - Businesses/Employees Displaced . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • � . . . . . . ' 52
TABLE 25 - Sensitive Population Displacement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . 52
TABLE 26 - Residential Relocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . 53
TABLE 27 - Business Relocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . 53
TABLE 28 - Difference in Development Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . 54
TABLE 29 - Off-Peak/Peak Hour Travel Times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . � . . . . . . 57
TABLE 30 - Off-Peak/Peak Hour Travel Times By City to MSP (Minutes) . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . 57
TABLE 31 - Projected Year 2020 Annual Glycol Application by
Alternative and Watershed (Gallons) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
TABLE 32 - Projected Year 2020 Annuai Mass Loading of Pollutants
to Stormwater System (Tons) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
TABLE 33 - Wetland Resources Potentially Affected by MSP LTCP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
TABLE 34 - Wetland Impacts Associated with the MSP LTCP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
TABIE 35 - Anticipated Wetland Mitigation Requi�ements for the MSP LTCP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
TABLE 36 - Peak Wate�fowi Populations within the MVNWR by Season; Source MVNWR
Annual Nar�atives gp
TABLE 37 - Waterfowl and Waterbird Use at MVNWR;•Spring and Fall Migration Periods, 1987 ..
-1991 for the Long Meadow Lake/Biack Dog Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
�
i
;
Oraft AED - MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Plan
0
�
Na j
•v ,,t
:�
�r
`�' .� .
.:!
�
r�..:-,;
�
�
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure i �
Figure 1�1
Figure 12
Figu�e i 3
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figu�e 17
�
� Figure 18
Figure 3 9
Figure 20
� Figure 21
�
�
�
�
��
�
LIST QF FlGURES (in Appendix B�
MSP Location Map and Existing Ai�port Layaut
LTCP Altemative 1
LTCP Alternative 2
LTCP Alternative 5
LTCP Alternative 6
Alternative Etiminated - LTCP Alternative 3
Alternative Eliminated - LTCP Alternative 4
Air Quatity Receptor Sites
Archaeological Resources
HistariostlA�chitecturat Resources
Potential Bird-Aircraft Hazard Areas
Ftoodptain
Planned Land Use
1992 DN[. Coniou�s
DNL 65 Contour Comparisan - 2p00, 2005, 2020
2005 QNt. Gontaurs •�TCP Aiternaiives 1, 2
2005 DNL. Contours • LTCp Alternatives 1,2 Without Ru
4-22 Extensian
2005 DNL Con#ours - LTCP Alternatives 5,6
2Q05 L,a65 Contours and Runway Use - lTCP
Alternatives 1,2
2005 L,Q65 Contaurs and Runwsy Use - LTCP
Alternatives 5,6
2005 Flight T�acks - I.TCP Alternatives 1,2
Figure 22 2005 Flight T�acks - LTCP Alternatives 5,6
Figure 23 Selected Noise-Sensittve Receptor Sites
Figure 24 Seciion 4{f} Park and Recreation E.ands
Figure 25� Residential/Commercial Areas Affected by Highway
Icr�pravements -- Alterrtatives 2 and 6
Figure 26? 1990 Daily Traffic
Figure 27
Figure 28
Figure 29�
Figure 30
Figure 31 ,
Figure 32
Eigttre 33 �
Figure 34 �
Figure 35
Figure 36 i
Figure 37 �
2020 Daily Traffic - No Action
202Q Daily Traffic - LTCP Alternatives 1,5
ZQ20 Daiiy Traffic - LTCP Atternatives 2, 6
No. of 20Z0 F�eeway T�avei Lanes by AI#ernative �
Stormwater Qrai�age Areas� Basins, & Strc�ctu�es
Bedrack Geology
Hydrogeaiogic Characte�izations - Well E.ogs
Soils
Aquifer Sensitivity �
Wetlands
Wildlife Refuge
Draft AED - MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Plan
�
MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Plan
Draft Atternative Environrrtentai Qocurt�ent
Executive Summary
Purpose of the document
This dacument contains the results af evaluation of the impact on the environment of four different
plans unde� study by the Met�opolitan Ai�ports Commission (MAC} to expand Mirrneapolis-St. Paut
Internationat Airport (MSPj. The MAC is updating its 30-year development plan for the airpor# — known
as a long-term comprehensive plan -- to meet the requirements of the �egislature in the Qusl Track
Airport Plartt�ing Pracess. I
The '1989 Minnesata Legislature directed the MAC and Met�apofitan Councit to engage �n a sever�-year �: .. .
planning proaess to determine how best ta meet the region's future aviation dema�rd. The agencies �
were direciec! to compare expansion of the current airport wixh building a new reptacement airport, and
make a recommendation to the Legisiature in July 1996. �
The MAC wi1E use the er�vironmer�tat evaivatian found in #his dacument, atong with operationai and cost
da#a developed for the long-term comprehensive plan, to select a best development plan for expansion
oi the Minneapalis-St. Paut tnte��rationaE Airport. That decisioct wii� occcr� it� February �'i 995. That pla�,
alang with a new airport plan, a no-action option and other feasible alternatives will be �compared during
1985 far the '1996 report ta the Legislaiure.
Atternaiives stu�ed
As required by Eaw, this is the second comprehensive plan study done by MAC for M:
Track prqcess began in 1989. This second MSP cornprehensive plan s#udy is an updatE
compteted in 199i. The MAC and Metropalitan Council in JuEy 1993 revised and upd
30-year fo�ecasts of aviation demand. The MAC is required by Dual Track legislation to
plan to take into account any changes ihat might be necessary as a �esuit of the �e�
P since the Duat
of an earlier one
ted the region`s
�pdate the 1991
ised fofecasts .
Changes in the forecasts were not substantial enough to warrant altering the concep�s behind the six
deveiopment atternatives for MSP which were pteviausly studied. However, two of tF�e pians — those
proposing a second south parallel runway (Na. 3 and 4) -- were dropped from aonsideration this time
because of signiiicant operational and no�se concerns discovered during the tast stuc�y.
The basia concepts of the four remaEning a{tematives evaluated in this
� \
Altemative 1-- Const�uction of a �ew 7,700-faot north para!!el
, additionat passenger terminal east af the existing terminai.
Altemative 2-- Construction of a new 7,700-foot north paraliet rui
' replacement terminal which would be developed on the west side of the
study are:
and an
and a
a A/ternative 5— Construction of a new 8,000•foot north-south runway to be located on
� the west side af the airpori and an additiona! passenger terminal eas# of �he existing
. terminat. j
L?raft AED - MSP Gong-Term Comprehensive P(an
I
I�
Alternative 6'-- Construction of a new 8,000-foot north-south �unway to.be located on
� the west side of the airport and a �eplacement terminal which would be di veloped on
the west side of the airport.
i
An illustration of each of these alternatives can be found in Figures 2-4 in Appendix B.
Environmenta/ eva/uation
Each of the four alternatives was examined for environmental impacts in 19 areas, and
and possibie, potential mitigation measures ere discussed.
The 19 ereas of evaluation were: air quality; archaeological �esources; biotic commui
hazards; construction impacts; endangered and threatened species; energy supply and
flood plains; historical and architectural resources; land use; noise; park and
socioeconomic; transportation access; visual; surface water quality; groundwat�r; wet
refuge. � .
The environmental evaluation did not �eveal any c�itical finding that would p�eclude
of the alte�natives. It did reveal differences between the four MSP development al
significant diffe�ences between the alternatives are as follows:
1
�ecessary
bird-ai�craft
�I resources;
�tion lands;
and wildlife
nt of any
Areas of
� � Archaeological — The construction of light signals in the approach zo�es leading up to
' proposed runways would result in some disturbance of archaeological sites in Fort
; � Sneiling State Park. Alternatives 1 and 2 would impact two sites; Alternatives 5 and 6
,
would impact one site. �
• Bird-Aircraft Hazard — A bi�d-strike occurs when bi�ds collide with ai�craft. Alternatives
5 and 6 have a higher potentiai for bi�d st�ikes than do Alternatives 1 end 2.
��
�
• Construction — The altematives which include a west terminal (2 and 6) have fewer
construction impacts than the alternatives which include a second terminal`just east of
, the existing te�minai (1 a�d 5). That is because of the problems associated with
continuing srriooth operation of the existing terminal and roadway system in the middie
� of a major const�uction area. I
• Historical/Architectural -- Federal law prohibits the harmful use of National Register
historic properties/dist�icts by federaliy-funded transportation projects unless there is
� no feasible and prudent alternative. Alternatives 1 and 2 would require dest�uction of
buildings in the Fort Snelling National Historic Landmark District and the Old Fort
' Snelling National Historic Dist�ict. Altematives 5 and 6 would h�ave no imp�ct on these
� districts. Each alternative wouid �emove the old Wold-Chamberlain te�mi � al district.
• Noise — More people will be impacted by noise under Alternatives 1 and 2! Within the
� DNL 60 noise contour for the Year 2005, 3,030 more people will be impacted by noise
� under Alternatives 1 and 2 than under Alternatives 5 and 6. Within the DNL 65 noise
� contour, 670 more people are impacted under Alternatives 5 and 6, t`han under
� Alternatives 1 and 2. I
� Park and Recreation Areas — Fede�al law prohibits the use of publiciy-owned park and
�recreation areas for federally-fu�ded transportation projects unless the�e is no feasible
and prudent alternative. Alternatives 1 and 2 would adversely impact t o park and
' rec�eation areas; Alternatives 5 and 6 would have no impact. i
l I
Draft AED - MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Plan
ii
• Socioecanomic -- More �esidents would be displaced by Alternatives 1 and 2; more
businesses would be displaced by Alternatives 5 and 6. Alternative 5 would displace
� a low of 402 �esidents, Altemative 2 would displace a high of 1,14�4 residents.
; Aiternative 1 would displace a low of five businesses with a total of 60� employees;
j Alternative 6 would displace a high of 77 businesses with a total of 2,919 employees.
�
i ,'
�
�
Alternatives 2 and 6 would cost about 5167 million more to develop than
1 and 5.
Transportation Access -- Average t�avel times for the alternatives are es'sentially the
same during the peak period, for the metropolitan area as a whole. Alternatives 1 and
5 are six minutes slower than Alternatives 2 and 6 f�om downtown Minneapolis and five
minutes faster f�om downtown St.Paul during the peak period. The west terminal
�equi�es const�uction of a new interchenge at Highways 77 and 62 C+osstown to
provide access from the regional highway system. �
Groundwater — Bedrock under the area whe�e a new west terminal wo�uld be built
makes Alternatives 2 and 6 p�eferable to 1 and 5. Bedrock would make the
g�oundwater less susceptible to potentiai contamination during fueling ope�ations than
the softer ground below the area where the second east te�minal would �e buiit.
Wetlands -- Each of the alternatives impacts wetlands. Altemative 1 fares the best in
this category, impacting 29.1 acres of wetland, while Aite�native 6 is� the worst,
impacting 46.9 ac�es.
A chart summa�izi�g the findings for all 19 evaluation criteria follows at the
summary.
Hesring end App�ova/ Process
:
The contents of this draft e�vironmental document wiii be reviewed by the N
Airports Commission, a public hea�ing will be held on it, a final version of the docur
reviewed by the Commission, and the e�vironmental analysis will be part of the
adopt one of the development alternatives for the long-term comprehensive p
Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. Below is the schedule for that process.
Commission Reviews Draft Document
Public Hearing on Draft Document
Commission Reviews Final Document
Commission Adopts MSP Long-
Term Comprehensive Plan
September 1994
October'�7 994
January 1995
February 1995
,
As was stated earlier, similar environmental analysis and comprehensive pian develo
conducted for a potential new replacement airpart and will be completed ea�ly in 1995.
analysis of both of these options and any other feasible alternatives wiil take place dur
a �ecommendation to the Legislatu�e in July 1996.
; .
, � .
Draft AEO - MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Plan
iii
of this
: will be
ision to
fo� the
�ment is being
Evaluation end
ng 1995, with
�
�:.
� SUMMARY OF DtFFERENTtA[. tMPACTS
CRITERIQN
� 4
� Air Quality '
� 3. Number of� viotatians of air quality standards in year 2020.
2. Qifference in tatai CO emissians in year 2420 {torts}.
� Archaeologicel Resources
3. AItliTiL?SC O# 8[CFl880IO�tC8I SI#�S @il�i�}i8 f4f tI1@ %i8ttOt18i RB�tStBE
that would be disturbed.
� Biotic Communities
4. Number of ac�es of wildlife habitat displaced.
pifferential Impact�'�
, 5. Difference in monthty sitcraft averftights af waterbird habitat at
low aititudes. •
Bird-Aircraft Hazards Mother Lake
., , 6. Qifference in monthly ai�c�aft operatians
less ti�an 500 feet over lakes ia
� ctose proximity to MSP where birds Woad Lake
congregate.
� Gun Club Lake
i
' ; Long Meadaw &
; Black Dog Lakes
IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE
t 2 � 5 6
�0' ���
����
2 2
29 42
O 13
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 '1 i
34
5
1,550
1,558
47
i8
1,550
1,550
7�
2,010 2.010 I 0 0
0 0 3,230 3,230
� Construction ,
7. Oegree of adverse impact on airport users during conswction. major mino� i
Endangered end Threatened Species �
� 8. Number o# endangered and threatened spectes dispfaced. 0 O
9. Potential adverse impact on �esti�g bald eagles. q 0 �r
� Energy Suppty and Naturat Resaurces
10. L�ifference in fuel cansumption in year 2020 (millions of 3.7 2.0
gattons} ,
Ploodplains
� 1'{. Adverse eifects of floodplain enaroachment. negligibte negtigibte ne
NistodcailArahitecturai Resaurces
� 12. tVumber of known historicai/architectural properties/districts on 2" 2`
ar eligible for National Register that would be displaced.
'lncfudes a Natianal Historic Ca�dmark Oistrict
�
� 13. Numbec of individual properties and historic districts within the 1? 17
ONL 65+ noise cantour requiring iurther study ta detear►ine
National Register eligibility.
�" Vatues shown are the difference of acres displaced between the aiternative with the least impact I
� the other three alternatives.
f
1
i �
`
, ' 4� , D�aft AED - MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Plan
� y IV
� '
� �
najor minor
0 0
inimal minimal
1.7 0
�tigibte negligibte
1 1
17 17
lttemative 1) and
c
�
� ;
; CRITERION
r
� Land Use - '
14. Number of municipalities requiring changes in existing or
planned land use.
� Noise 1 Mpls.
15. Number of persons �esiding in the year 2005
DNL 65 noise contour. Richfield
� Bloomington
Inver .Gr Hts
� Mendota kits
. � Eagan
� � TOTAL
i
� • Differential impact
�; 16. Number of persons �esiding in the year 2005 Mpls.
DNL 60 noise contour.
Richfield
� ' Bloomington
�
I
inver Gr Hts
1
� Mendota Hts
I
� Eagan
� .
TOTAL
� � Differentiai Impact
17. Difference in number of noise sensitive land uses in Year 2005
DNL 65-75 noise contours.
� Section 4(f) Park and Recreation Lands
18. Number of Section 4(f) park and recreation lands displaced.
19. Number of Section 4(f} park and �ecreation lands within DNL
� 65 noise contour.
Socioeconomic
20. Number of residents displaced.
� j Differential Impact
21. Number of households displaced.
� 22. Number of off-airport businesses and Businesses
employees displaced.
� ! Employees
,
IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE
1 2 I 5 6
4 � 4 � � 2 � 2
3,610
600
30
0
150
10
4,400
0
16,270
2,310
3,320
20
810
960
23,690
3,030
0
2
7
1,003
601
468
3
32
�; ' i i Oraft AEO - MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Plan
�
,
�
3,610
600
30
0
150
10
4,400
0
16,270
2,310
3,320
20
810
960
23,690
3,030
0
i�
�
1,144
702
530
20
157
4,410
290
370
0
0
0
�,070
670
6,870
1,750
I ,520
0
140
350
0
46
10
372
4,410
290
370
0
0
0
5,070
670
16,870
1,750
1, 520
0
140
350
20,660
0
3
�
a
543
141
208
27
1,452
�
� • � �
CRITERtON �
� 23. Number of businesses and employees on Businesses
MSP property disptaced.
Emplayees
� 24. Difference in totat businesses and Businesses
employees displaced.
i
Emptoyees
� 25. Diffe�ence in estirnated devetopment costs {construction,
demalition, acquisition and relacation). (Millions)
� Transpartation Access
26. Difference in average peak-hour travel #ime to terminal
{rninutes}.
� Surt'ace Water Quality
27. Oifference in impaets on surface water quatity.
Groundwater 4
� 28. Rank€ng af attematives for patentiat to adverssly impact
aquifers used for drinking water.
Wettands !
� 29. Numbe� of acres of wetlands affected.
qifferential Impact
��IdPrfe Refuge �
30. Number of human use areas in the Minnesota DN4 65
Natianai Witdlife Refuge affected by aircraft noise.
�` DNL 60
,
�
� ,
� ; .
� �
� �
,
� , ;
+
i
IMPACT OF AC
��
2
28
i7
125
fi i 67.6
:R(VATIVE
5
�..._
50
1,467
55
2,778
O
6
...�
50
1,467
72
2,859
$'! 88.8
0 0.3 � 0 0.3
0 8 � 0 0
4 2 3 i
(worst) (best)
29.1 41.9 � 34.1 46.9
0 12.8 I 5.0 i 7.8
�'�0' ���
����
� � t: praft AED - MSP i.ong-Term Comprehensive Plan
'`" � , vi
� �
� '
I�i
�
.;�
i
[I. ALTERNATIVES
A.` General bescription
i
The Long-Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP) alternatives for the Minneapolis-St.
Airport (MSP) consist of a new runway, taxiways, aprons, internal roadwa�
concourses, building areas and t�eatment facilities, and supporting infrastruct�
(changes in ground t�ansportation facilitiesl to accommodate the future air tra
of the region. The location of the existing airport is shown in Figure 7.
B. Alternatives Under Consideration
�i International
new terminal,
improvements
ortation needs
The alternatives selected in the scoping process for further study and evaluation a�e Alternatives
1, 2, 5 and 6(see Scoping Decision Document, Minneapolis-Saint Paul Internatioriat Airport Long-
Term Comprehensive Plan, March 1994). �
Alternative 1- Construction of a second 7,700-foot north-parallel runway north of; and parallel to,
the�existing north-pa�allel runway, an additional passenge� terminal east of the existing terminai,
and sateilite gates and a passenger parking/drop-off facility on the west side of thi airport (Figure
2). The new runway would function principally as an ar�ival (landing) �unway.
Alternative 2- Construction of a second 7,7000-foot north-parailel runway as described in
Aiternative 1; a replacement passenger terminai building on the west side of the airport; and a
passenger parking/drop-off facility on the east side of the airport (Figure 3). The �unways would
fu�ction as in Alternative 1. Placing the passenger terminal on the west side of the airport c�eates
a"new f�ont door" for MSP.
Alternative 5- Construction of an 8,000-foot north/south runway on the west side of MSP; an
additional east passenger terminal building; and satellite gates and a passenger parking/drop-off
facility on the west side of the airport (Figure 4). The new runway would be used almost
exclusively to and from the south for both take-offs and landings. I
Alternative 6- Construction of an 8,000-foot north/south �unway on the west side of MSP; a
� replacement west passenger terminai building; and a passenger parking/drop-off facility on the east
side of the airport (Figure 5). The new runway would function the same as Alternative 5. Placing
the passenger terminal on the west side of the airport creates a"new front doorj for MSP.
� C. � Atternatives Eliminated
��.
i
� The following alternatives were eliminated by MAC in the Scoping Decision Docu
21,11994.
��
�
Alternative 3• Construction of a second south-parallel runway south of, and
existing south-parallel runway; an additional east passenger te�minal building; an�
and a passenger parking/drop-off facility on the west side of the airport (Figur�
�unway would function principally as a landing runway. The existing south parallel
principally as a departure (take-off) ru�way.
Alternative 4- Construction of a second south-parallel runway as described in
�eplacement west passenger terminal building; and a passenger parking/drop-off 1
i
Draft AED - MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Plan
II-i
on Ma�ch
arallel to, the
satellite gates
6). The new
vould function
iative 3; a
on the east
�
.::`•:; •
:.�
�
�!
�
�
side of the ai�port (Figure 7). The runways would function as in Alternative (3. Piacing the
passenger terminai on the west side of the airport creates a"new front door" for MSP.
LTCP Alternatives 3 and 4 were eliminated from further consideration becau:
operational and noise co�cerns brought to light during the update of the LTCP
MSP. These concerns resuit from the westward stagger of the �ew runway b
5,OOU feet from the landing threshold for the existing Runway 29L and the ass�
airport would operate with departures using the existing parallel runway (closes�
area? and arrivals using the new parellel runway. The reason for the stagger of 1
accommodate the approach surface clearance of the elevated te�rain in the Fort :
Cemetery. The cemetery has been declared eligible for listing on the National Re4
Places and is the third most active cemetery in the National Cemetery System.
436.3 acres hold over 96,000 graves.
�
The use of the new runway for landings when the airport is operating to the n�
landing aircraft clos'e to the area of greatest wake turbulence from departures o
In addition, wake turbulence produced by landing airc�aft could drift to the takeof
where aircraft would be breaking ground on departure. Interaction with wakt
aircraft in close proximity to the ground is a significant safety issue. These situatic
in an additional dependency between the �unways, which would �educe the cap�
ai�lines expressed conce�n during the p�eparation of ihe LTCP for the safety of
pass over the higher ground of the national cemetery when Ianding on the new
northwest o� when departing ove� it to the southeast.
a of significant
3lternatives for
approximately
nption that the
to the terminal
ie runway is to
�elling National
ster of Historic
'he cemetery's
rthwest places
i Runway 29L.
runway (29U,
turbulence by
is woutd �esult
city. Also, the
iircraft as they
runwa�/ to the
Another operational concern involves the penetration of the Terminal Instrument Procedu�es
(TERPS) approach surface to the south parallel runway from aircraft on the taxiway between the
existing Runway 11 R-29L and the new runway. This would mean that while airc�aft are landing
on the south parallel runway, Taxiway B(planned as a full length parallel taxiway to Runway 11 R-
29L on the south side of the �unway) would not be usable in the area of the stagger between the
south parallel �unway and Runway 11 R-29L. This would be a significant operational problem.
A south' parallel �unway would also generate significant additional noise im
Minneapolis and Richfield. The population within the Year 2000 DNL 60 n�
Alternatives 3 and 4, generated during the preparation of the LTCP, would be �
This would be over 10,000 more perso�s than Alternative 6. Noise impacts
g�eater, if use of the new south �unway was changed during northwest-flo
accommodate most of the take-offs (in order to alleviate some operational and caF
This change would move airc�aft departing to the northwest approximately 5,0!
Minneapolis and Richfield when they begin their "takeoff roll." '�
This staggered runway layout would also require that the �AA �unv: ay safety area
area be designed to cross Tru�k Highway 77 (TH 77), also know;a as Cedar Aven
would require a"tunneling" of TH 77 be�eath a bridge-like structure that woi
required safety areas. This would b�ing airport facilities across Cedar Avenue in�
would significantly complicate access to the new west terminal area.
,
i
D. , P�eferred Alternative
(The� Commission will select the preferred alternative after the close of the public
on the draft AED in November, 1994.)
�
� Draft AED - MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Plan
� II-2
cts for south
e contour for
250 persons.
ould be even
conditions to
ity concernsl.
feet .close� to
nd object-f�ee
s. The desig�
d support the
Richfield and
period
�
, i
,
�
Aircraft Type
Air Cartier Jets:
DC8
DC9-30 (HUSHKIT)
� MD80 �
MD90 i
oc�o '
MD11 '�
6727 (HUSHKIT)
6737 300/400/500
6737 200 (HUSHKIT)
6747 200/300/400
,
B757
. B767 200/300
B777 �
A300 �
. A320/321
� A330 ;
A340 '
� L1011 � .
� BAe 146/RJ/F-70
a
F-100
EM 145/CanRJ
� Air Carrier Turboprops:
CNA/PAG/BEC
� SWM/J31/BE7/BE9
SF340/DH8/J41
S2000
L7 88/CVR/F27/ATPlATR
i
,
i
Generd Aviation:
� GA Jet ;
GA Turboprop
GA Piston
�
Mil'Rary ;
� �
TABLE 16 - 2005 Projected Fleet Mix and Average Daily Departures
PROJECTED 2005 AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURES
Subtota�l
Subtotal
1.0
29.6
32.9
6.6
10.1
4.0
11.8
27.2
0.2
7.5
81.0
3.7
1.4
0.5
68.4
4.7
0.4
0.7
1.0
76.1
7.6
376.4
2.9
30.9
66.6
29.3
16.7
146.4
31.4
14.7
20.7
Subtotal 66.8
3.8
Total 593.4
1.8
4.1
2.6
0.4
1.3
0.6
3.0
1.8
0.1
0.9
7.9
0.3
0.1
0.7
6.3
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.0
5.2
0.4
38.3
3.5
6.9
3.4
1.6
4.6
20.0
.,
5.7
2.7
3.8
12.2
0.3
70.8
Source: HNTB analysis, based on MSP LTCP Volume 6, Revised Activity Forecasts (December, 1993).
,
;
Draft AED - MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Plan
I I I-37
Total
2.8
33.7
35.5
7.0
11.4
4.6
14.8
29.0.
0.3
8.4
88.9
4.0
1.5
1.2
74.7
5.0
0.5
1.1
1.0
81.3
8.0
414.7
6.4
37.8
70.0
30.9
21.3
166.4
37.1
17.4
24.5
79.0
4.1
664.2
�
� TABLE 15 - 2005 Projected Fleet Mix m�d Average Osily Artivals
PROJECTED 2005 AVERAGE DAILY ARRIVALS
-- _____- _
Aircraft Type Day Night
Air Carrier Jets:
OC8 j 1.1 1J
DC9-30 (HUSHKIn 29.6 4.1
M080 ; 32.8 2.7
MD90 � 6.6 0.4
DC10 10.0 1.4
, MD11 � 3.9 OJ
B727 (HUSHKIT) 11.6 3.2
6737 300h400/b00 27.2 7•8
B737 200 (HUSHKIT) •• 0.2 0.1
6747 200/3Q0/400 7.5 0.9
8757 81.0 7.9
6767 200/300 3.7 0.3
6777 1.4 0.1
A300 0.5 0.7
A320/321 ' 68.5 6.4
A330 ' 4J 0.3
A340 0.4 0.1
L1011 , 0.6 0.5
BAe 146/RJ/F-70 0.9 0.1
F-100 # 76.1 5.2
EM 145/CanRJ 7.1 0.9
Subtotal 375.4 39.5
i
�
Air Cartier Turboprops:
CNA/PAG/BEC 3.0 3.4
SWM/J31/BEI/BE9 29.2 8.6
SF340/DH8/J41 61.8 8.2
S2000 � 27.2 3.7
L788/CVR/F27/ATP/ATR 15.7 5.6
, Subtotai 136.9 29.5
a .
General Aviation:
GA Jet � 32.8 4.2
GA Tuttsoprop 15.4 2.0
GA Piston 21•7 2•8
Subtota! 69.9 9.0
Military i •4.0 0.1
� Total 586.2 78.1
�
Source: HNTB analysis, based on MSP LTCP Volume 6, Revised Activity Forecasts (December, 1993).
i
- ' --
Draft AED - MSP Long-Term Cbmprehensive Plan
Iil-36
Tota!
2.8
33.7
35.5
7.0
11.4
4.6
14.8
29.0
0.3
8.4
88.9
4.0
1.5
1.2
74.7
5.0
0.5
1.1
1.0
81.3
8.0
414.7
6.4
37.8
70.0
30.9
21.3
166.4
37.1
17.4
24.5
79.0
4.1
664.2
�
Dua{ Track Airport Planning Process . MSP Aiternative Environmental Document
r � --t— �� Fu � � E`' —
, ._ . �"
_�� i . � . . . . . . .���^���:��I��'" � � J
�%��� ,-i� . _• -��'�; --- �il`�� � ��"� � i �",
_ /
� �`F�� �' � '�, -- _ � �: �
,,�- —� �� . ( ,
,�-1 I � , �� � �`r� O ���i.�.'�� �'� ' �
���� � ■�„� � � ,,,, � � ����_�..td��
I'', � ��, ,_ .� � • -...■■f, r� � �
,
� . ��� , ���� .� _ , ��\ � -!�=�� �-
� ��s, � �; ��"� ° '�
'� ; �, ��•�� ���ii`r� iR'���� 1 �'� ♦ `` y � \ m
— �
� : -�
;` ,�
��,
�
t R
� �
a 8 �i �
a 1 l� ls
a0
t
E •
d� • I �•.
s .
��D {f
�
�
� � � �
� � �
e` j� - �
, :,��" ' � �I i
i a�';�.� ,; � �
�
�POL�S
y.,E i� .
. ,�} �•�j
� '
��, � �� Source: TKDA
� o
� f
M
�1 �. a,y`y
��OOORSS ��
��i��;�' � � ��'
�� i � �' ,
�� - - �
� -���. �
_�.,���
� ► � �i, '��''� � �
. � ..i,�`/,.
i�`\
, `. i ` `'I "\'��� �t`�1� .`���: • ..,`�� l )�.
1`�1 �_,•_ .. ���N�/�_\\\���`� �
N�TON�L [QtRI1T
Rf D
o . �50 �,aoo 1
.�'CB�B:
Scale in Feet N
• �
MSP Locatlon Map and Exist(ng_Airpor.t_Layout
Dual Track Airport Planning Process
MSP Alternative Environmental Documen#
vs.a�a u� r-av� 1�E
I 9 � x .
0 0 ��
� I '1.. .� ./� _: yy �
Dual Track Airparf Planning Process
MAC
HNTB
MSP. Alternative Environmental �Documerit
Figtare 3
Dual Track Airport Planning Process
MAC
HNTB
�
■
MSP Atternative Enviranmentai Document
Figure 4
Dual Track Airport Plarining Process
NiSP Atternative Enviranmentai Document
'1 +, A-= VYVILII� li���Y
"A-
p O
' . . i " �
y
� t! � , . • �
'�« '�• Y•jl:i;:[It:a..• �
__•. " �l�� • ,�„c:i:. ..h �+:`�" + '�' .,, �
....�"' ,�t�i?S=s£ {•J" 3: r "'� w-" "'� � � ."" `. /1
• y ,� �; ` ,�� .�j, . : _ �»'� .� - ` � `
r: . � ....,, % n
�./�.;=- ...�\' � t�,r,=:r�-�....,,� J (� .
%�t ��..».. y�1 � i+ "".'i�(' ij.,ti;' '- � u Q' f' O
1 '',( � �i•' ,, O
. `r , ' ! `
i 1 � �
i � �•
' ,,! ' �� �~w `� O� �
�•. i:; ti �' j"' f �
. (}
� / r � � � �V.
' q ' Q �
. � � � A
' .� � q o
�_�� A o O
- _._, s d �
_ .._ _._ _.. � � ,•,Qo �.
.
. %� •
st �
_�� � '�/t
� �''' �J/
�! � M ,,,f U
,� � ,,
*,,
;�
tf �, '� �
=1 ' �� /
� � cU 0
� �
i i 1 �`�
... 3 �
i �
..� �_'. � �
�� . �„"' ��+
.`�' \ � /' ~� � �
�i�,}Ott3 s�
.►`�' � �'�r
V! � C
:,�, , �= Source: ARS
4 0
r
b
��y � � ,�w
��RpolltS to
�
�
/ 1 �/ 'N, �`
� �N
I ' ��
. �
' . � � �, ,/ ��.
�� 1 1��^ �.
`�♦� �� •:ri �
��4 ,�� :,
� ..
� �l .'
�• 7
G ` 1
� �
$� p r � ; r
4. �'�... ,�
`, ���,• .,� �+ � f r / � , �j%f":r� i�%/
.
d N�
�// �
LJ � �j a,x`�,` / j �,j �
f r��/�r� �{� �
�j , "�,�, 1
� � � ,•' �.f' ��� ..r•:
i / i� �,ti.�'� '.-/
/ r ,�..1
r���l� 8ite No! Eliglble Far Ne#lonal Regiater 0 1,000 2 000 �
SGaIe: �---1-----i
� 8i#e Etiglbte For Nettonat Ragiater Scate in FeeE N
� ,. •
Archaeological Resources
�
Dual Track Airport Planning Process
�MAC
HNTB
� ,"
...y �...��1 � /f/.''J�'
�
MSP Aiternative Environmentai Document
Figure 10
Dua! Track Airpart Planning Process
I�
i'�` j "n-; .�w�co: re�a�avn ��m�uou�en�a�
�a a
I:�l►`_l1_'�'' 1. a
0
!
�
9
MSP Alternative Environmental Dacument
!
FigUre 11
Dua( Track Airport Planning. Process �
MSP Alternative Enviranmental Document
n. �� � �* awr�o: n��w ---•- •.. .....__ i`1
8 b
� % l NN M �
� .
Duai Track Airpori Pianning Process
MSP Alternative Enuironmental Document
� s� t "b'; VVYi4Qe {i�7�Y �\
� • j O
rt i �ry •
Dua1 Track Airpori Planning Process
MSP Alternative Environmental Documeni
�'�. ► 'x"= �aurcv: nn � a a�aiv m mn�s n
� « o 0
b
7.. .{. � � �.
Dual Track Airport Ptanning Process
. MSP Aitern�tive Environmentat Document
, �• _
. ,.,,,��
ri. � _ y~ � ��
1
11�
�aa
Dual Track Airport Planning Process
MSP Aiterna#ive Environmental Document
i�` � T; �OU�CO: �1I'/l[f VYQIV ui mnva �
f 4
i_ 1 � _yb
a
Duat Track Airport Pianning Process
MSP Alternative Environmental Document
�� � A A'Z �74YI�i�: (11�10 vwww ... �•...vv �
f 4
` N �
_ i .�. ./A �y
�
�
� ,
, �' ;
�
; �
, TO:
FROM: ;
SIIBJECT :
, ', ;
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
i i� •
October 13, 199
Mayor and City Council
Tom Lawell, City Administrat
Acknowledge Receipt of MnDOT Letter --
Interchange Road Noise Concerns
DISCIISSION �
1
At' our September 6, 1994 meeting, Council authorized the
Mayor to send a letter to MnDOT Metro Division Engineer,ICharles
Siggerud, expressing our concerns regarding possible noise
impacts asaociated with the new Mendota Interchange Project. To
help refresh your memory, a copy of the Mayor's letter is
attached. j
� This past week we received a reply from Mr. Siggerud, a,copy
of which is also attached. In the letter Mr. Siggerud describes
the design characteristics of the project and their anticipated
impact on vehicle noise. In addition, he mentions MnDOT�s
estimated $500,000 landscaping project anticipated for the
roadway corridor. Planning and design for this project is
expected to "begin in the early Spring of 1995". �
, ,
ACTION RFQIIIRED
� Co�ncil should acknowledge receipt of MnDOT's letter
should determine if the answers provided within satisfact
address�our concerns. If not, Council should identify tY
issues which MnDOT needs to further clarify.
, ,
�
i
• 1
i
and
rily
September 30, 1994
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metropolitan Division
Waters Edge Building
1500 West County Road B2
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
The Honorable Charles E. Mertensotto
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Cun•e .
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118
Dear Mayor Mertensotto:
Thank you for your letter of September 9, 1994, expressing your concerns about the
Mendota Project. •
One of the objectives of the design of the project was reduction of traffic noise by moving
the highway further away from residenrial are�s and lowering it wherever possible.
In the case of Trunk Highway (T.H.) 55, this was done by converting a portion of old
Highway 55 to a Frontage Road and construction of the new mainline roadway from a
minimum of.80 feet to maximum of 300 feet to the west and depressing it a minimum of
4 feet to a maximum of 20 feet.
Trunk Highway 110 was moved south approximately 280 feet at the new T.H. 13
intersection to approximately 100 feet south near Glenhill Road and 30 feet south near
Hunter Lane. From Hunter Lane east it is on the original alignment. The grade varies from
6 feet to 12 feet lower between Glenhill Road and Hunter Lane. From Glenhill Road to the
�vest, the ariginal westb�und T:H. 11� is now the narfh Frantage� Road.
There should be a decrease in noise levels throughout the project because of the greater
distances from the highway to the homes and because of the lower highway elevations.
The retaining wall along the south Frontage Road is approximately 90U feet long, beginning
at a point across from Glenhill Road and running west. The height is variable the maximum
is 8 feet. For the most part, the wall is across from the ravine. Any noise reflection should
be more than offset by the increased distance to the roadway. There does appear to be space
for some plantings along part of the wall to decrease the reflective quality.
An Equal Opportuitiry Employer
� . ,
�
� The Honorable Charles E. Mertensotto
Page Two
September 30, 1994
, ,
; �
� There is �a landscaping project programmed for 1996, with an estimated cost of
The planning and design will begin in the early spring of 1995. The Mendota u
i unique because it has quite large spaces between roadways that can be used to di
excellent design with a greater number of plantings to create a parkway appearat
enhance the impressive views in the area. Visual screening will be developed wl
possible.' ,
, ; '
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) Environmental Services
� do the design with input from the cities of Mendota Heights and Mendota. �John
Prelimulary Design Engineer, will be contacting you to arrange a meeting to disc
� concerns'of this project. If you have additional questions or concerns please con
, 7ohn Cazoon at 582-1292. Thank you for your interest.
� �
Sincerely;
c: �
Charles A. Siggerud, P.E.
Division Engineer
a
cc: Tom Lawell, City Administrator-Mendota Heights
, 7im Toye, Mayor of Mendota
� 7ohn Caroon
�
�
,
; ' ;
' I
� t
, , , .
. , �
. � ,
� t
: i
:
),000. �
;hange is
op an
and
Unit will
Caroon,
uss the
September 9, 1994
Mr. Charles Siggerud, Metro Division Engineer
Minneaota Department of Transportation
15.00 West County Road B2
Roseville, NIlv 55•113-3105
Dear Mr. Siggerud:
The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights has been
monitoring the progress of the Mendota Interchange construction
project over the past several years and wishes to go on record
expressing our concern about various aspects of the project.
More specifically, we are concerned about the impacts the newly
rebuilt roadways, particularly that portion of TH 110 from
Lexington Avenue to TH 55 and the portion of TH 55 from Acacia
Drive to Mendota Heights Road, will have on nearby residential
areas.
As evident from the construction, the width and grade of
both TH 110 and TIi 55 have changed dramatically compared with the
preexisting roadways. In the case of TH 110, the roadway
reconstruction has required the installation of a massive
retaining wall along the south side of the road which has already
caused increased vehicle noise levels in the area due to the
reflective nature of the retaining wall. Once the roadways are
reopened to traffic, we are greatly concerned about the overall
anticipated noise exposure levels. The conversion of many
roadway surfaces from blacktop to concrete also threatens to
increase the expected noise levels.
Previously we have gone on record indicating to MnDOT
that the roadway rights of way in the area will need considerable
landscaping to allow them to aesthetically mesh with the
surrounding land uses. In reconstructing the roadways, many
ma.ture oak trees were removed from the area. In addition, the
product of a prior community beautification project-- dozens of
mature flowering crabapple trees -- were also removed as part of
the reconstruction. Suffice it to say that the reconstruction
project has significantly altered the complexion of a large
portion of our community.
� .
� ; �
�
i
#
, � +
; � ,
Mr. Charles Siggerud
September 9, 1994
Page 2�
, �
i .
In light of the emerging road noise problems, we now feel
that the proper landscaping of these roadways is even mo�re
critical. The sound dampening nature of certain plant species,
and the visual barrier created by the proper landscaping plan,
will go a long way towards addressing what otherwise wowld prove
to be a ma.j or community problem.
�
In order to address these concerns in a positive and
proactive manner, we request a meeting with you and memb�ers of
your staff to explore developing a design that would con�siderably
reduce'anticipated noise impacts. At that meeting we would like
to expTore with you the concept of landscaping the area roadways
consistent with a"parkway" design. . I
� ; -
We hope that by addressing the anticipated noise impacts
associated with this project, we can considerably reducelthe
potential for public displeasure when the roadways reopen.
Please;contact our City Administrator, Tom Lawell, to arrange for
a meeting to further discuss this issue. We look forward to
working with you on this matter of great community impor�ance.
cc:
Tom Lawell
i
�
1
�
;
;
i
Sincerely,
CITY OF MENDOTA
Charles E. Mertensot
Mayor
,
�
�
.
.�
�
�
�� `
TO:
FROM:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Mayor and City Council �
Tom Lawell, City Administ
October 13, 1994
SIIBJECT�: Discuss'ion of 1995 ANIl�! Legislative Policies
�
DISCIISSION � -
Attached please a copy of the Recommended Policies
Legislative Proposals of the Association of Metropolitan
Municip'alities (ANIlK) for 1995. This 58 page document ou
the Legislative positions the AN�! intends to advocate at
State iapitol when the Legislature convenes in January.
The ANIl�! will meet to consider adoption of the legis
policy�package on November 3rd in Eagan. As explained i
attached letter from ANIl�! President Craig Rapp, the ANIl�I w
us to select from the ninety plus proposed policies the
policies of interest to the City of Mendota Heights.
TYie ANIl�! Policy Committee has suggested a number of
priority issues which are listed on the reverse side of
Rapp's�letter. In addition to those listed, one additio
policy�of interest to Mendota Heights is likely to be Po
#IV-C2�(page 34) which asks for a clarification of the r
composition of the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC
that the MAC currently possesses property tax authority
the Metropolitan area, it is argued that representation
Commission should be comprised of Metropolitan area res'�
only. �
.
ACTION�REQIIIRED �
C� uncil should review the ANIl�!'s 1995 Recommended P
and Legislative Proposals and should select five which i
considers to be of the highest priority to Mendota Heigl�
i !
In addition, please let me know if
attend,the ANIl�! Policy Adoption Meeting
Reservations must be made no later than
lines
the
ative
the
uld like
op f ive
gh
icy
le and
In
ithin
n the
ents
licies
t
ts.
you are plannin� to
in Eagan on Nove er 3rd.
October 31, 199�
Business agenda
1. Goll to order -
2. Wetcome CMayar%m Egan, Eagan)
° s�3: Adoption of 1945 �eglslative Po11cy Program
4. Establishmenfi of 1945 AMM tegisiative prtorffies
5. Discussion af Urban Strategies Tosk Farce report
6. New business
7. Adjournrinent
_ � Royal Cliff Conference Center
- 2280 �liff Road
� Eagan, Minnesota 55122
�_.�
i.'�' { L�
�'
� � 35E •
� `
} 444 , �,
Ciiff Road -
SA Q
a
Roya! Cliff �
35W
� - N
%Y -�.— E
Cedar Ave. S
,_
From 35E: Go wesfi on Ciiff Road and crass Cedar Avenue. .lusfi past
. Cedar Avenue, there is a Super America on the leff. Tum leff afi thafi
� �sfiop iight, and take fihe firsfi righfi affer the Super America. Royai Cliff
is located just behind the Super America.
�ram 35W. Go East on Cliff Road and tum right Just before Cedar
Avenue. There is a Super America on the righfi. Take the firsfi right
affer Super America. , � ��
�`
fits nofice has been malled direcfly to ail member Mayors, Councfi
members c�nd City Managers/Admintsfrators.
��
� ,
i as ociation of
� me�ro olitan
munic�alities
p
October 1994 '
�
Dear AMM member local officials:
a
�
Attached are the recommendations for the 1995 Legislative Policy program from the
standing committees. Please review the policies with your Council for action at the n
meeting scheduled for Thursday November 3 at the Royal Cliff banquet facility in Ea
the specifics' of fhe meeting will follow.
� ,
In order to give you the maximum time possible to review these policies, they are bei
prior to AMM board review. Any changes made by the Boazd at their October 13 m�
sent to you 'm a subsequent mailing, but mark November 3 on your calendar now.
Please review the policies and list your top five priorities by policy number. Your pa
important because the policy priorities help determine how staff time and resources a
(The policy committee suggestions are on the back.)
� �
Sincerely, i
I� ;
Crai app �
President, AMM
��������������������������������
1.
2.
3.
4.
s.
T���� ��ri��rit�� ����licic�
City Name (optional):
Please bring your response to the November 3 membership meeting, or mail to the
i fax to Roger at 490-0072.
;
; ' 3490 lexington avenue north, st. paul, minnesota 55126 (612) 490-3301
�MM's four
;�nbership
an. A notice on
� distributed
;ting will be
icination is
o�ce or
POLICY COMMITTEE HIGH PRIORITY ISSUE SUGGESTIONS
�
I:i�li/�l`►lil�]
I-F Oppose Conversion of City LGA and HACA to School Aid.
I-I State Fiscal Disparity Fund Distribution (Oppose use of F.D. to fund other
issues).
I-C and I-G-1 LGA AND HACA Continuation and Growth.
I-D-4 Property Tax Reform. (Oppose changes which would cause shifts in property
taxes creating large disparides among tax jurisdictions or regions.)
GENERAL LEGISLATION
II-A Oppose Reduction of Authoriry or Local Control.
II-B Tort Liability. (Maintain current limits).
II-G 800 MHz (Insure flexibility).
HOUSING , ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND LAND USE
III-A-4 State Housing Policy ('The State should provide more resources for
affordable decent housing).
III-A-6 Metropolitan Housing
III-B-1 Cities Redevelopment and Economic Development Activities (Recommends
that a state development strategy be developed).
III-B-7 Development of Polluted Lands (recommends establishment of an effective
program to clean up contaminated soils to aid in redevelopment).
METROPOLITAN AGENCIES
IV-C-1 Selection of Metropolitan Council Members.
(Recommends that Metropolitan Council members be directly elected instead of
appointed).
IV-F-1 Operation and Maintenance Funding for Regional Parks.
IV-B Criteria for Extension of Metropolitan Governance Authority. (describes very
specific guidelines for any increase in authority for the regional governance
system).
IV-G-2 Surface and Ground Water Management.
*Revisions to the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. No AMM Policy has been
developed as yet but this will be a major item during the 1995 Legislative Session.
TRANSPORTATION
V-D Transportation Highway and Transit Funding Alternatives.
V-L Regional Transit System.
_�
� t
as ociation of
me�ro olitan
munici�alities
p
RECOMMENDED
POLICIES
LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS
1995
Recommended for adoption by the AMM Membership on November 3,1994
THIS DOCUMENT IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED P
3490 lexington avenue north, st. paul, minnesota 55126 (612) 490-3301
�
INDEX
PART ONE
MLTNICIPAL REVENUES AND TAXATION
a
i .
• PAGE IWl
I. MUNICIPAL REVENUES 1-10
A. LEVY/VALLJE LIMITS
' 1.! Levy Limits . �
2., Oppose Valuation or operation Freezes
i
B. MANDATED STATE AND FEDERAL PROGRAMS
I
C. LOCAL GOVERNIV�NT AID
1.� Aid Formula Criteria
2. Local Government Aid Formula
3. LGA Growth
�
I � .
D. PROPERTY TAX
I
1.{ General Class Rate Change
2.� Non-Governmental Tax Exempt Property
3.' State, County, City and Metropolitan owned
i Tax Exempt Properry
4.' Property Tax Reform
�
. !
E. GENERAL FISCAL IMPACT POLICIES
,
�
1.` Fiscal Note Continuation
2. Funding Shifts
3. State Revenue Stability
4.' City Fund Balances
i
F. OPPOSE CONVERSION OF CITY LGA AND HACA TO
SCHOOL AID
1
I
? -i-
i
1
1
1
'2
'2
'3
3
4
4 �
4
4
4
5
6
6
7
7
7
8
G. HOMESTEAD AND AGRICULTURAL CREDIT
AID (HACA)
1. HACA Continuation
2. HACA Growth Factor
3. HACA Buydown For Class Rate Changes
H. STATE IMPOSED FEE FOIZ SERVICE
I. FTSCAL DISPARITY FUND DISTRIBUTION
PART TWO
GENERAL LEGISLATION
II. GENERAL LEGISLATION
A. OPPOSE REDUCTION OF AUTHORITY OR
LOCAL CONTROL
B. TORT LIABII.ITY
C. GENERAL PUBLIC DATA
D. POLICE AND FIRE PENSION PROVISIONS
1. Amortization Aid
2. Employee Contribution Amount
3. Benefit Increases
4. Assumption Changes
E. CONTRACTORS PERFORMANCE BONDS
F. 911 TELEPHONE TAX
G. 800 MHz RADIO SYSTEM
9
9
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
15
PART THREE
" I1VUJ11VlT L'ilVL �1,.V1VV1Vllt. LI3 V�LVi"1V1G1V 1 ti1VL LtilVL VJI'.
�
, III. HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOODS 16-31
ING AND NEIGHBORHOODS �
A. HOUS � 6
0
1: Examine Local Requirements That Affect �
; Housing Costs �17
2. Practices By Other Levels Of Government , (
Which Affect Housing Costs �17
3: Mandatory Land Use Standards 27
4., State Housing Policy �8
S� Loca1 Housing Policy 19
6: Metropolitan Housing Policy 29
7'. Neighborhood Liveability 20
8� Sta.te And/Or County Licensed Residential I
, � Facilities (Group Homes) 23
9.� Licensed Residential Facilities (Group I
! Homes) Inspections 24
, I, ,
B. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ' 25
1� Cities Re-development and Economic Development I
i Responsibilities 26
2� Reinstate/Expand Urban Revitalization Action I
! Program 26
3.; Equal Treatment of Cities 27
4' Tax Increment Financing � 27
5.' Responsible use of TIF 28
6� Other Development Tools 28
7� Development of Polluted Lands 29
8. Building Permit Fee Surcharge 3o
� I
C. LAND USE PLANNING 31
-111-
PART FOUR
METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE, STRUCTURE, AND ISSUES
IV. METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE PHII.OSOPHY
A. PURPOSE OF METROPOLITAN
GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE
B. CRITERIA FOR EXTENSION OF
METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE AUTHORITY
C. STRUCTURES PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION
AND FUNDING OF METROPOLITAN
SERVICES AND PROGRAMS
1. Selection of Metropolitan Council Members
2. Restructuring of Metropolitan Agencies
3. Policy Planning - Implementation
4. Funding for Regionally Provided Services
5. Regional Tax Rates and User Fees
D. COMPREHENSIVE PLANIVING - LOCAL AND
REGIONAL INTERACTION
E . METROPOLITAN COUNCIL BUDGET/WORK
PROGRAM PROCESS
1. Budget Detail And Process
2. Program Evaluation
3. Reliance on Property T�es
F. METROPOLITAN PARK AND OPEN SPACE
FUNDING
1. Operation and Maintenance Funding
2. Regional Bonding For Regional Parks
G. WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
1. Water Supply
2. Surface and Groundwater Water Management
-iv-
32-48
32
32
33
34
34
34
35
35
35 �
�
36
37
37
ic :
�
.
.
39
39
40
�
j
; 3. Regional Wastewater (Sewer) Treatment System
, 4. Water Testing Connection Fee
�
- H. WASTE STREAM MANAGEMENT
�
1. Integrated Waste Stream Planning
2. Hazardous and Dangerous Waste Management
3. Local Solid Waste Management Responsibilities
4. Funding .
5. Organized Collection
6. Host Cities and Cleanup Responsibilities
� � .
t
� PART FIVE
' TRANSPORTATION
�
V. TRANSPORTATION POLICY STATEMENT
1
1
7
,� ;
A. STREET, BRIDGE, AND HIGHWAY GENERAL I
FUNDING 50
a
B. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM GENERAL
FUNDING 50
i � I
C. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FUND 51
, '
D. TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY AND TRANSIT
FUNDING ALTERNATIVES 51
�
E. MSAS FUNDING FOR COMBINED CITY STREET
DEPARTMENTS
;
F. HIGHWAY NRISDICTION REASSIGNMENT,
TURNBACKS, AND FUNDING
�
G. TRANSPORTATION UTILITY
a
;
H. '3C' TRANSPORTATION �PLANNING PROCESS -
� ROLE OF ELECTED OFFICIALS
�
I. PRESERVATION OF RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
!
,
� -v- '
i
i
t
�
�
�
�
�
n
�
�
J. CITY SPEED LIMITS
K. TRANSPORTATION INCENTIVES/
DISINCENTIVES -
L. REGIONAL TRANSIT SYSTEM
M. MSA SCREENING COMMITTEE
N. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION TAX
O. AIRPORT POLICY '
P. BIKEWAY GRANTS PROGRAM
54
SS
55
56
56
5'7
58
MU1vICIPAL REVENUE AND TAXATION
PAGE 1 THROUGH 10
LEGISLATIVE POLICIES
1995
MUNICIPAL REVENUE AND TAXATION
, i
. �
I-A LEVY/VALUE LIMITS
�
A-1 LEV � LIMITSt
The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities commends the Legislature for removing
artificial Levy Limitations from cities for 1993 and beyond. The AMM has consistently �
opposed the levy limit laws in that they apply uniform statewide restrictions to cities and are
too inflexible to accommodate inflation, uncertainties in state and federal imancial aids, and the
diverse problems and circumstances faced by cities throughout the state. Such laws are
inconsistent with principles of local self-government and accountability. Neither do they
recognize changing local conditions as to either expenditure needs or revenue sources. Levy
limits ultirriately work against the interests of local taxpayers because the law creates an
incentive for cities to take maximum advantage of the opportunity to make general or special
levies. �
�
THE AMM STRONGI.Y SUPPORTS THE LEGI5LATURE'S DECISION TO END
, LEVY LIMITATIONS FOR CITIES AND FURTHER URGE5 THAT LEVY iLIMITS
NOT BE REINSTATED IN THE FUTURE.
�
A-2 OPPOSE VALUATION OR OPERATION FREEZE5
During thet 1993 legislative session the administration and some legislators made s�
proposals related to levy limitation through freezes or referenda. As in the case of
levy limitations these type of artificial restrictions will work adversely for the taxp
long run. Property valuation freezes will create property t� disparities between cu
new property and will create large individual tax bill fluctuations when the freeze :
property valued at market. Also, creating temporary payroll or operating freezes w:
cause larger increases at some later point or violation of state labor law. Providing
� �
� 1
e previous
�ers in the
;nt and
lifted and
in turn
;ferenda to
allow frozen operations to increase will in itself cost money and impose unnecessary
bureaucracy into the local government budget process.
T�IE AMM OPPOSES IMPOSITION OF ARTIFICIAL GIMMICKS SUCH AS
VALUATION FREEZES, PAYROLL FREEZES WITH REFERENDA, OR OTHER
LIMITATIONS TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUDGET AND TAXING PROCESS.
I-B MANDATED STATE AND FEDERAL PROGRAMS
The cost of local government is being influenced more and more by both state and federal
legislatively mandated programs and increased mandated benefits or costs for in place
programs. At the same time the legislature and administration are suggesting that expenditures
are far too great at the local level and that cutbacks are needed. Cities cannot provide
additional mandated programs without seriously impacting the ability of cities to provide the
traditional services of public safety, street maintenance, snowplowing, etc. Mandated programs
such as pay equity, binding azbitration, PELRA, certain Data Practice requirements, expensive
election rules, waste recycling, and truth in taxation cost money. These costs must be recovered
through levy, state payment, or reduction of current service. There is no other way.
THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RECOGNIZE THAT MANDATED
INCREASED EXPENDITURES IN ONE PROGRAM WITHOUT A CORRESPONDING
INFUSION OF FUND5, MANDATES A NEW PROPERTY TAX OR A DECREASED
EXPENDITURE IN THE OTHER SERVYCE AREAS SUCH AS PUBLIC SAFETY,
ETC. THEREFORE, WHEN NEW PROGRAMS OR INCREASES TO EXISTING
PROGRAMS ARE MANDATED, THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD PROVIDE
SUBSTANTIAL STATE FUNDING ASSISTANCE.
I-C LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID
State Aid to cities has heen a much debated legislative issue for over two decades. During that
time the formula(s) have ranged from pure per capita, to need based on value and service, to a
distribution based on location and past spending. Homestead Credit has changed to Homestead
Aid and is no longer a direct taxpayer subsidy. New gimmicks such as Disparity Reduction Aid
(Mill rate equalization) and Tax Base Equalization Aid, have been invented to target money to
various regions when the general aid formula could not be politically designed to work, and .
subsequently have been folded into the main LGA fund. With few exceptions, cities across the
nation have access to more than one form of municipal revenue. The dedicated Local
Government Trust Fund recognized that and was developed to provide Minnesota cities with a
second source, sales tax, in addition to the traditional small share of the property tax.
However, the legislature created structural deiicits in the fund to ensure that LGA increases
would be held to less than sales tax growth.
Although, the LGTF has been eliminated, the legislature did recognize the need to continue
its partnership with cities and replaced the trust fund with an LGA growth index, the Lnplicit
2
Price Deflator for State and Local Government Services (IPD). The LGA fund w
annually at the rate of the IPD with a minimum of 2.5% and a maximum of 5%.
I ,
C-1 AID FORMULA CRITERIA
i
ANY AID DI5TRIBUTION FORMULA SHOULD CONSIDER AND SUBST
INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA:
-THE SALES TAX IS A GENERAL REVENUE SOURCE FOR CITY EXPEP
AND THUS SOME DISTRIBUTION TO EACH COMIVIUNITY MU5T BE Pl
TO UPHOLD THE ORIGINAL COMMITMENT TO ALL OF THE STATES
TAXPAYERS;
grow
Y
' I
-RECOGNITION OF BURDENS CAUSED BY RAPID POPULATION GRO TH;
� � �
-RECOGNITION OF BURDENS CAUSED BY�POPULATION LOSS IN MEETING THE
DEMANDS FOR PUBLIC SERVICES; I
-RECOGNITION OF NEEDS BASED ON CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS SUCH AS
AGING POPULATION, HOUSING STOCK, AND INFRASTRUCTURE; 1
-RECOGNITION
�
-RECOG1vITION
OF WEALTH OR TAX CAPACITY;
OF BASIC NEEDED SERVICES WHICH SHOULD BE
AT AN �PROPRIATE SUPPORT LEVEL; AND
�
-RECOGIVITION OF PROPERTY TAX BURDEN RELATIVE TO INDIVID AL
WEALTH: � � �
I
C-2 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID FORMULA
The aid formula proposal developed by the League of Minnesota Cities for the 199
session basically incorporated the criteria as stated in I-C-1 above. The legislature �
LIVIC proposal by using average statewide tax rate times tax capacity as the base r
twice the average tax base, substituted a declining grandfather for the LMC rolling
and added some cap limitations. The 1994 legislature changed the grandfather to ]
Although the distribution changed some, the adopted formula is based on need and
substandally include the need criteria. ,
1
ALTHOUGH THE ORIGINAL 1993 LMC PROPOSED LGA FORMULA I5
PREFERRED, THE AMM CAN SUPPORT CONTINUATION OF THE CUR
FORMULA. IF CHANGES ARE CONSIDERED BY THE 1995 LEGISLATL
WILL 5UPPORT ONLY CHANGES OF�'ERED TO THE CURRENT FORM
HAVE A POSITIVE IMPACT ON METRO AREA CITIES.
1
. �
; 3
legislative
�dified the
�er than
�
T LGA
AMM
THAT
C-3 LGA GROWTH
In order to ensure that city property taxes do not grow abnormally, there needs to be continued
growth in the LGA which is a major portion of the overall revenue base of cities.
THE AMM SUPPORTS CONTINUED GROWTH OF LGA AT THE GROWTH RATE
OF THE IMPLICIT PRICE DEFLATOR (IPD) WITH A MINIMUM OF 2.5% PER
YEAR TO MAINTAIN THE EXISTING LEVEL OF PROPERTY TAX RELIEF.
ADDITIONAL PROPERTY TAX RELIEF SHOULD BE CON5IDERED BY THE
STATE AS REVENUE WARRANTS.
I-D PROPERTY TAX
D-1 GENERAL CLASS RATE CHANGES
A portion of the property tax relief provided to farms by the 1993 legislature was accomplished
by shifdng county and school taxes to city taxpayers. This shifting causes local property tax
burdens for certain properties to increase due to the actions of the state legislature. However,
local government officials are held responsible by their taxpayers. ,
THE AMM OPPOSES CHANGES TO THE PROPERTY TAX CLASSIFICATION
SYSTEM THAT WOULD CAUSE SIG1�iIFICANT SHIFTING OF PROPERTY TAX
BURDENS FROM ONE CLAS5 TO OTHERS.
D-2 NON-GOVERNMENTAL TAX EXEMPT PROPERTY
One of the glaring inequities in the Minnesota tax system involves the frec 1oca1 services that
are provided to tax exempt property owned by certain non-governmental organizations. It is '
widely acknowledged that such property benefits direcdy from governmental services such as
police and fire protection and street services provided by cities. However, since there is not
legal basis for claiming reimbursement for the cost of such services, they are borne by the local
taxpayers. Furthermore, such property is concentrated in certain cities resulting in a heavy cost
burden in certain parts of the state. ,
THE ASSOCIATION BELIEVES THIS PROBLEM SHOULD BE CORRECTED BY
ENACTING LEGISLATION, REQUIRING OWNERS OF TAX EXEMPT PROPERTY,
EXCEPT FOR CHURCHES, HOUSES OF WORSHIP, AND PROPERTY USED
SOLELY FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES BY ACADEMIES, COLLEGES,
UNIVERSITIE5 AND SEMINARIES OF LEARNING, TO REIMBURSE CITIES FOR
THE COST OF MUNICIPAL SERVICE5 5UCH AS POLICE, FIRE, AND STREETS.
D-3 STATE, COUNTY, CITY AND METROPOLITAN AGENCY OWNED TAX
EXEMPT PROPERTY.
0
# , �
The State of Minnesota, some cities, counties and Metropolitan Agencies own a;
amount of property within the metropolitan azea. Cities provide a range of servic�
these properties. However, since the they are exempt from paying property taxes,
are not reimbursed for the cost of these services. This places an unreasonable bw
i
The State of Wisconsin established a program called "Payment for Municipal Serv
1973. The program provides a mechanism for municipalities to be reimbursed by t
services they provide to state-owned properties. Through a formula based 'on the v
state-owned buildings within a city, the Wisconsin system reimburses cities for po
solid waste services.
, ;
THE AMM ENCOURAGES �'HE 5TATE LEGISLATURE TO ESTABLI5H
PROGRAM FOR REIMBURSING MUNICIPALITIES FOR SERVICES TO
COUNTY, �OTHER CITY AND METROPOLITAN AGENCY FACILITIES. '
PROGRAM SHOULD ENSURE THAT CITIES RECEIVE COMPENSATIO.
SERVICES THAT ARE FUNDED THROUGH GENERAL REVENUE, SUC]
POLICE AND FIRE, WHICH ARE VALUABLE TO THE STATE OF MINP
COUNTIES, ANOTHER CITY AND METROPOLITAN AGENCIES.
` '
D-4 PROPERTY TAX REFORM
+ .
that benefit
�unicipalities
n on cities.
;es" in
e state for
lue of
ce, fire, and ,
�
�TATE,
'HE
fFOR
AS
ESOTA,
Many significant changes in the property tax system have been made since the 198�8 Session.
� The AMM believes it is critical that any future proposals be evaluated on the basi�
impact on individual communities. A proposal that may appear balanced on a statf
,
can have very disparate effects on individual cities.
t
� The difference in property tax burdens among taxpayers living in neighboring tax ,
which provide similar services must also be kept within reasonable limits. Any sig
burden disparities would adversely affect cities' abilities to compete on a fair basi;
residents and economic development.
i
of their
vide basis
for
'.� •�
Tax increment districts are dependent on tax rates and assessment ratios of the c��ent property
tax system: The financial viability of those projects should not be jeopardized by s�ta.te-imposed
changes in the tax structure. Likewise, enterprise zone businesses have been recru�ted based on
a commitment that they would receive a preferential classification ratio in the calcalation of
their property tax obligations. These development districts should be protected from any
negative consequences of tax reform. The tax increment financing plan in effect at the time
legislation is passed should be the basis for determining remedies.
!
In enacting any major reforms of the Minnesota property tax system, including the
complementary system of property tax relief through aids to local government, the AMM
, recommends that the Legislature pursue policies which meet the following conditions:
i �
THE IMPACT OF ANY PROPOSAL SHOULD BE THOROUGHLY ANAL ZED, FOR
, i •
�
� • 5
MAJOR SHIFT5 THAT INCREASE DISPARITIES IN TAX BURDENS AMONG
TAXING JURISDICTIONS OR REGIONS WITHIN THE STATE SHOULD NOT
OCCUR.
ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES SHOULD BE PHASED IN SO THAT CITIES CAN
ADEQUATELY PLAN FOR ANY NEEDED ADJUSTMENTS.
LOCAL GOVERNMEIVT AID, OR AN EQUIVALENT PROGRAM OF PROPERTY
TAX RELIEF SHOULD REMAIN AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE
PROPERTY TAX SYSTEM. CATEGORICAL AID PROGRAMS SHOULD NOT
BECOIVIE A SUBSTITUTE FOR LGA AND RELATED PROPERTY TAX RELIEF
PROGRAMS. �
PROPERTY TAX REFORM SHOULD RECOGNIZE THE TAX/CASH FLOW NEEDS
OF AND NOT JEOPARDIZE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT DI5TRICT5, TAX
INCREMENT FINANCE DISTRICTS OR ENTERPRI5E ZONE5.
THE CHANGES IN TAX STATEMENTS MADE BY THE 1988 LEGISLATURE HAVE
THE POTENTIAL TO MISLEAD TAXPAYERS ABOUT THE VALUE OF
HOMESTEAD AND AGRICULTURAL CREDIT AII) (HACA) PAYMENTS MADE TO
LOCAL GOVER1vMENTS AND SHOULD BE CORRECTED.
AN INCOME-ADJUSTED CIRCUIT BREAKER AND RENTER5' CREDIT SHOULD
CONTINUE.
SIMPLIFICATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY ARE DESIRABLE GOALS THAT
SHOULD BE ADDRESSED WITHIN THE ABOVE TENETS.
I-E GENERAL FISCAL IMPACT POLICIES
E-1 FISCAL NOTE CONTINUATION
Many laws are passed each year by the legislature which have a substantial effect on the
financial viability of cities. Some of these, such as revenue and tax measures, have an obvious
and direct effect which is often calculated and reported during the hearing process. Many
others, such as worker's compensation benefit increases, mandated activities, binding arbitration
and other labor related legislation, social programs, etc., have costs which are not as obvious
but which will now be known due to a fiscal note requirement. Cities and others will now be
able to determine the real cost of a program or suggestion and he able to use this data in
determining the merits. �
THE STATE SHO.ULD CONTINUE A POLICY OF "DELIBERATE RESTRAINT" ON
ITS MANDATED PROGRAMS AND UTILIZE EXTENSIVELY THE FISCALrNOTE
STATUTE IDENTIFYING LOCAL GOVERNMENT COSTS ON ANY NEW
C�
MANDATED PROGRAMS.
E-2 FUNDING SHIFTS
;
The Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department annually prepares '
Aids and Taxes: A Comparadve Analysis'. The statistics for 1985 through 1992 sh
imbalance of state revenues collected and aids and credits distributed between the �
and outstate areas. Nearly 65 % of the State Revenue is collected in the Metropolil
while only� about 46% of the aids and credits are redistributed in the metro area. In
was nearly $.59 returned in aids and credits for each dollar collected in the metro
1/2 cent from 1990) whereas, there was $ 1.25 returned per $1.00 collected in grea
Minnesota. (down 7 cents from 1990). The trend in the past two to three years has
slightly in favor of the metro area but there is still a vast imbalance in favor of ou�
disiribution per amount collected. If the imbalance is allowed to continue, state tax
policies may jeopardize the future economic growth of the metro area to the detrirr
whole state.
;
STATISTICS COMPILED BY THE HOUSE RESEARCH DEPARTMENT S
THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE STATE REVENUE IS RAISED IN THE 1
AREA WHILE ONLY A MINORITY OF THE STATE AID5 AND CREDTT�
ALLOCATED TO THE METRO AREA. THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEG
TO CONTINUE TO REDUCE THE IMBALANCE AND TO CONSIDER H(
DISTRIBUTION OF RESOURCE5 EFFECTS THE ECONOMIC GROWTH
VITALITY OF THE METRO AREA AND THUS �'HE ENTIltE STATE.
I
E-3 5TATE REVENUE STABILITY
i
The AMM has in the past supported a state reserve fund to help deal with unantic
economic changes that could result in mid year cuts to various city aid programs.
also supports cash flow balances for cities so that short term borrowing is unnece;
same case 'can be made for the states cash flow. Finally, it seems prudent to devel
term correction or unallotment process that does not penalize any one segment of
budget recipients over another segment if the economy drops beyond a reasonable
balance.
vfajor State
�w an
netropolita.n
�n Area
1992 there
�rea (down
:er
�een very
>tate
and aid
ent of the
[OW
[ETRO
ARE
SLATURE
W THIS
�AMM
y. The
a mid
state
THE AMM SUPPOItTS A CONTINUED STATE FUND TO PROVIDE FORISTATE
BUDGET CASH FLOW NEEDS AND A RESERVE FOR UNEXPECTED BUDGET
SHORTFALLS DUE TO ECONOMIC DOWNTURNS. THE AMM ALSO
ENCOURAGES THE LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION ON PLANNING AND ISCAL
POLICY TO ADOPT A UNIFORM ACROSS THE BOARD UNALLOTME
PROCESS FOR MAJOR ECONOMIC DOWNTURNS SIMILAR TO THAT�ROVIDED
BY THE 1993 LEGISLATURE. '
i �
t
E-4 CITY FUND BALANCES
1
i
� �
There are several reasons why cities must carry adequate fund balances. First, cities need
substantial cash balances at the beginning of their fiscal year to finance expenditures for the
%rst six months of the year. (By statute, cities' fiscal year is on a calendar year basis, running
from January 1 through December 31.) The main sources of city revenue aze property taxes
and state aid; property tax payments are not made to cities until June and state aid is not
provided until late July -- six to seven months into the city fiscal year. Without the necessary
cash balance at the beginning of the year cities do not have funds to operate for the first half of
the iiscal year. The alternative would be for the city to engage in costly borrowing which is not
in the interest of local taxpayers or the state. The office of the state auditor has recommended
that to be prudent, cities should carry an end-of-the-year dedicated cash balance sufficient to
fund city expenditures for the first half of the year.
Second, many cities, in order to save taxpayer dollars and avoid paying cosdy interest on debt,
accumulate funds for major capital purchases and infrastructure. A common example is saving
over a period of years to purchase an expensive fire engine or public works vehicle. In some
cities, it may appear as if a city has a large reserve compared to its annual expenditures, but in
reality it is "saving" for a major purchase. Confusion over this practice has lead cities to more
prudently designate their fund balances to clarify the intended future use of such funds.
Because of the vast differences in the size of the 856 cities of Minnesota and the various local
preferences in financing purchases, it would be bad public policy for the Legislature to restrict
or eliminate cities' abilities to accumulate fund balances.
Third, cities need to maintain some fund balance to meet emergency or unanticipated
expenditures created by situations such as cuts in aid, natural disasters, lawsuits, and premature
breakdown of vital equipment. Cities are not given the necessary revenue raising authnrity to
be able to address these issues in the middle of a budget year.
And finally, bond rating firms require liquidity and a demonstrated ability to pay debt in order
to receive a favorable bond radng. Bond rating firms scrutinize city fund balances when rating
bonds. The better the bond rating of a city, the lower the interest cost of borrowing is to the
taxpayer. Therefore,
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD NOT ATTEMPT TO CONTROL OR RESTRICT CITY
FUND BALANCES. THESE FUNDS ARE NECE5SARY TO MAINTAIN THE FISCAL
VIABILITY TO MEET UNEXPECTED OR EMERGENCY �tESOURCE NEEDS OF
CITY GOVERNMENTS, TO PURCHASE CAPITAL GOODS AND '
INFRASTRUCTURE, PROVIDE ADEQUATE CASH FLOW AND TO MAINTAIN
HIGH LEVEL BOND RATING5.
I-F OPPOSE CONVERSION OF CITY LGA AND HACA TO SCHOOL AID
Converting city HACA or LGA to school aid would force many cities to dramatically
increase their property taxes in order to maintain sufficient operating revenues. Reducing
8
school levies across all jurisdictions by taking aids from cities would cause signific�
deferential between cities that now receive a high proportion of aid versus those th�
little aid. This will be especially dramatic between cities and bordering towns. In f
due to constant pressure to increase the resources available for schools, there is no �
that conversion of city HACA or LGA to school aid would result in permanent redi
school levies or have a neutral impact on the taxes paid by local taxpayers. In fact,l
previous history it is almost certain that local school property tax rates will increasE
THE AMM STRONGLY OPPOSES CONVERSION OF CITY LGA AND
SCHOOL AID.
I-G HOMESTEAD AND AGRICULTURAL CREDIT AID (HACA)
i
G-1 HACA CONTINUATION
+
i �
Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (HACA) is the residual aid from the old H
and Agricultural credit programs. Taxpayers see a Homestead calculation on their .
� Statements but as time has passed, this calculated number and the actual HACA p;
local governments is significantly different and of no relationship. $50 million of c
was shifted to schools in the late 1980's and has since been further reduced throug
cuts. Unfortunately the school tax rates reduced by the shift have since risen beyor
buydown level. HACA is an integral part of the state and local governmental serv
financing. It is the vehicle used to control property tax increases when class rates �
and it augments not duplicates the LGA system. HACA is as important as LGA a
should be continued as a major part of the state and local fiscal partnership.
�
HACA 5HOULD BE CONTINUED AS A PART OF THE STATE AND LOC
RELATIONSHIP AND INCREASED AS APPROPRIATE.
i
G-2 HACA GROWTH FACTOR
HACA is approximately 40% of the total aid to cides. The 1993 legislature re eale
P
' grawth factor for cities, towns, schools, and special taxing districts but not for cou:
beginning in 1994. A HACA growth factor assures that the property tax relief pro
state through the classification system is paid by the state and not through tax shifi
property. It is needed to continue property tax relief along with the LGA progra�
, {
THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RESTORE THE HACA GRC
FACTOR FOR ALL CITIES AND TO APPLY THE SAME IMPLICTT PRI�
DEFLATOR INDEX TO THE CURRENT HACA DISTRIBUTION AS IS AP
LGA. � �
i �
G-3 HACA BUYDOWN FOR CLASS R�l.TE CHANGES
0
it tax rate
receive
Idition,
�ctions in
based on
�
operty Tax
ment to
� HACA
general aid
the
modified
thus
FISCAL
the HACA
ded by the
to other
TO
In the past the legislature has used HACA to pay for class rate changes for �C/I and high valued
homestead properties to ensure that other property classes are not penalized.
THE AMM SUPPORTS STATE BUYDOWN OF FUTURE CLASS RATE CHANGE5
THROUGH HACA TO PREVENT SHIFTING PROPERTY TAX BURDENS TO
OTHER PROPERTY CLASSES.
I-H 5TATE IMPOSED FEE FOR SERVICE
The legislature recently adopted a fee of $5.21 for each municipality connected water hook up
to provide money for federally mandated water well testing. The state imposed the fee in a way
that local city officials have been blamed for the fee and increases on water bills resulting from
the fee. In addition the fee was not imposed on trailer parks and certain other private interests,
thus allowing a large portion of the population to escape paying. Finally, it has been reported
that the total collected was in excess of the need and that the excess has been deposited in the
state general fund for general expenses.
THE AMM OPPOSES THE STATE MANDATING FEE5 IN A MANNFR THAT
FORCES CITY OFFICIALS TO BE HELD AS. THE RESPONSIBLE CULPRITS IN
LEVYING AND EXPLAINING THE PURPOSE. THE AMM ALSO OPPOSES FEE5
THAT ARE NOT SPREAD EQUITABLY TO ALL AND OPPOSES OVER
COLLECTION OR USE OF A REVENUE GENERATED FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE
TO BE USED FOR GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXPENSE5.
I-I FISCAL DISPARITY FUND DISTRIBUTION
Fiscal Disparities (F.D.) is a fis�al tool that shares Commercial/Industrial F:�perty value for tax
purposes in the seven-county metropolitan area. Its primary purpose is to help equalize, to
some degree, the property tax wealth among the cities by sharing part of the growth in
communities experiencing significant growth with those experiencing little growth. A secondary
aspect is it tends toward equalizing taxes on similar C/I properties in various communities.
Recently suggestions have been raised to use a percentage of the fiscal disparities funds for
specific social or other programs in the metropolitan area. Because of the way F.D. is
calculated, this would amount to a hidden property tax increase across the metropolitan area
that impacts the property tax poorer cities the most. Fiscal disparities distribution is applie.�
after levy certi�cation so'the property tax increase is automatic, not discretionary at the local
level. Therefore,
THE AMM OPPOSES USE OF FISCAL DISPARITIES TO FUND SOCIAL OR
PHYSICAL METROPOLITAN PROGRAMS SINCE IT RESULTS IN A i
METROPOLITAN -WIDE PROPERTY TAX INCREASE HIDDEN FROM THE
PUBLIC WITH AN EXCES5IVE IMPACT ON COMMUNITIES WITH LOWER
P1tOPERTY WEALTH.
10
0
GENERAL LEGISLATION
PAGE 11 THROUGH 15
�
,
GENERAL LEGISLATION
;
II-A OPPOSE REDUCTION OF AUTHORITY OR LOCAL CONTROL
,
The AM1VI has for many years opposed certain statutory changes that erode local a
mandate activities which cost money to implement unless there is a provision to re
costs. Rather than adopt a separate policy for each issue, the AMM believes that a:
policy the legislature should not decrease current authority or mandate activities cri
costs to cities without providing the necessary funding or unless there is overwheln
demonstration of obvious need. Included in this general policy is opposition to ma�
as; mandating wards for elections, setting city employee salaries, state or metropoli
of tree treatment contractors, plumbing inspections by licensed plumbers only, and
competitive bidding for land sales.
THE AMM OPPOSES STATUTORY CHANGE5 WHICH ERODE LOCAL
AND A�JTHORITY OR CREATE ADDITIONAL TASKS REQUIRING NE�
ADDED LOCAL COSTS WITHOUT A CORRESPONDING FUNDING MEI
THIS INCLUDES MANDATING ELECTION BY WARDS AND INTRUSIO
� 5ETTING LOCAL SALARIES.
II-B TORT LIABILITY
The Municipal Tort Liability Act was enacted to protect the public treasury while �
, citizens relief from the arbitrary, confusing, and administratively expensive prior d
sovereign immunity with its inconsistent and irrational disrincdons between govern�
� propi7etary � activities. The act has served that purpose well in the past, however, co
frequently forget or ignore the positive benefits secured to citizens damaged by put
as a result of enactment of the comprehensive act �which includes some limitations
and .some qualifications of normal tort claims procedure.
1
The special vulnerability of far-flung government operations to debilitating tort suit
to require the existence of a tort claims act applicable to local governments or loca
governments and the state. The need for some type of limitations is evidenced by r�
experiences with the insurance market. Cities in Minnesota are finding it increasing
to obtain irisurance at an affordable rate, if at all. Amendments in 1983 to double �
amounts recoverable,by plaintiffs should be adequate to satisfy any reasonable claii
changes in -limits beyond the current $200,000 per person and $600,000 per occurre
not be made. "
.
Joint and several liability provisions have been modified to lessen the deep pockets
some. The current limit of payment is times two for liability of 35% or less (i.e. if
� 11
�
a
�
i
I
�
� 1 -
1
�
�nonty or
�ver those
general
tting added
ing obvious
�ates such
�n licensing
OR
HANISM.
'IN
iving
�ctrine of
nental and
1rts
lic servants
�n liability
> continues
y difficult
ie dollar
i. Further
ice should
effect
the city is
30% liable, they may be required to pay 60% of the damage award) or total responsibility if
liability is over 35% (i.e. if the city is 40% liable, they may be required to pay 100.% of the
damage award). This still seems onerous especially when this comes out of taxpayers pockets.
Payment liability should definitely not be increased.
The municipal tort liability limits do not apply to an employee working for a second non
municiple employer that may or may not have liability insurance. This exception could cause
awards against a city to be greater than the statutory limits.
THE AMM SUPPORTS THE CONTINUED EXISTENCE OF THE MUNICIPAL TORT
LIABILITY ACT AND RECOMMENDS THAT THE CURRENT LIMIT5 OF
LIABILITY REMAIN INTACT. JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY PROVI5ION5
FOR PAYMENT LIMITS SHOULD NOT BE INCREASED FROM CURRENT LAW
SO THAT TAXPAYERS ARE NOT 5UBJECTED TO DEEP POCKET AWARDS.
LIABILITY LIMIT EXCEPTIONS FOR MUNICII'AL EMPLOYEES WORKING FOR
A SECOND NON MU1vICIPAL EMPLOYER SHOULD BE ELIMINATED.
II-C GENERAL PUBLIC DATA
The Government Data Practices Act allows municipalities to charge the actual costs of
searching for, retrieving, and copying public data if copies of the data are requested. The law
prohibits municipalities from chazging the costs of searching for and retrieving data if a person
asks only to inspect it. In many cases, the searching and retrieving are the most
time-consuming aspects of supplying data. Making a copy is frequently only a small portion of
the time required and should not be the standard for determining whether a charge i�
appropriate.
Profit-making enterprises have used this free service to augment their businesses. For example,
individuals have established businesses for preparing special assessment searches. Personnel
from these businesses use city facilides, including exgensive computer equipment, to obtain the
special assessment data. The personnel may also take significant amounts of staff time for
explanations of the data collected. They then dominate the publicly provided telephone for
lengthy periods to transmit the information obtained. These businesses use city facilities and
personnel as part of a pro�t-making enterprise, solely at taxpayer expense. Municipalities
should be allowed to charge for retrieving and explaining public data whether or not the
request includes copying.
The law also prohibits municipalities from charging for separating public from non-public data.
This task may be very time-consuming and is necessary to protect the non-public data.
Municipalities should be allowed to charge for this service.
To preserve the Act's spirit and intent of keeping government records open to inspecdon for ,
public purposes, the new charges proposed would not apply to the media or to private citizens
E�?
requesting information about themselves or their own properties.
;
THE AMM ENCOURAGE5 THE LEGISLATURE TO AMEND MINN. ST,
5UBD. 3 TO ALLOW MUNICII'ALITIES TO CHARGE FOR RETRIEVING
EXPLAINING PUBLIC DATA AND FOR SEPARATING PUBLIC FROM
NON-PUBLIC DATA. THI5 AMENDMENT WOULD NOT APPLY, HOWE1
THE MEDIA OR TO PRIVATE CITIZENS REQUESTING INFORMATION
THEMSELVES OR THEIIt OWN PROPERTIE5.
II-D POLICE AND FIItE PENSION PROVISION5
�
,
Local police and full-time %re relief associations were phased out by the 1980 legi�
unless the local council opts to keep the relief association. All new employees will
of the state police and fire PERA fund and the state will reimburse local units for
the unfunded liability remaining in the local fund. The unfunded liability was proje
paid by the year 2011 but during the 1980's, investment earnings were in excess c
. thus could, �at that continued rate, reduce the time to year 2005. Past earnings are n
� indication of what happens in the future. The legislature considered siphoning earr
excess of that needed for 2011 amortization to reduce state payments and property
unfunded liability as well as provide a bonus (13th. paycheck) to retirees. If inves�
increase drops below 10 %, the local properry taxpayers in future years will pay m
to pick up the property tax reduction but the state reimbursement reduction. It wou:
public policy to wait until the unfunded liability is funded. Also, 1979 Law set em�
contributioris at 8% and the Legislative Retirement Commission has in the past es�
general policy requiring public safety employees to pay 40 % of the normal pensic
I
D-1 AMORTIZATION AID
i
THE AMM OPPOSES LEGISLATION THAT PROVIDES FOR REDUCTIO:
5TATE AMORTIZATION AID TO LOCAL POLICE AND FIItE RELIEF
ASSOCIATIONS.
,
D-2 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT
EVEN THOUGH THE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT WAS SET
MANY FUNDS THIS IS NOT EQUIVALENT TO 40% OF THE NORMAL C
THE AMM URGES THAT THE CONTRIBUTION LEVEL BE SET AT 40 i
NORMAL �COST OF FINANCING THE BENEFITS EVEN IF THIS AMOUr
EXCEEDS 8% OF BASE SALARY.
�
, . , �.
D-3 BENEFIT INCREA5ES
�
;
THE AMM OPPOSES ANY BENEFIT INCREASES FOR LOCAL POLICE
�RELIEF ASSOCIATIONS UNLESS AN INCREASE, INCLUDING ANY RES
13
T. 13.03,
AND
ER, TO
ABOUT
�come part
portion� of
�dtobe
10% and
an
�gs in
K levy for
�, not only
be better
�yee
�lished a
costs.
� OF
T8%,IN
�STS.
OF THE '
fD FIRE
TING
DEFICIT, IS FINANCED 50 % BY THE EMPLOYING CITY AND 50 % BY
EMPLOYEE3 ON A CURRENT BASIS.
D-4 A5SUMPTION CHANGES
THE AMM SUPPORTS CHANGES IN ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS RELATING TO
SALARIE5 AND INVESTMENT RETURN TO MORE TRULY REFLECT
EXPERIENCES. THE AMM OPPOSES PAYMENT OF ANY TYPE OF BONUS TO
ACTIVE OR RETII2ED MEMBERS (13TH, CHECK) AS A PART OF ACTUARIAL
ASSUMPTION CHANGES. "
II-E CONTRACTORS PERFQRMANCE BONDS
The 19891egislature modified Minnesota Statutes 574.26 to allow contractors to provide a
letter of credit instead of a performance bond for contracts of less than $50,000. Although an
improvement at the time, this still will create significant hardship with many reputable minority
and small contractors. In todays market, projects in excess of $50,000 are very common and
are not really large jobs. Experience also shows that letters of credit are safer for the public
and easier to collect than Bonds. The emphasis should be on protecting the public.
THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO PROVIDE GREATER FLEXIBILITY
IN CONTRACTOR GUARANTEES FOR CITIES BY ALLOWING IN ADDITION TO
BONDS, OTHER RELIABLE FINANCIAL SECURITY GUARANTEES, SUCH AS
LETTERS OF CREDIT, WITHOUT LIMITATION AS TO PROJECT CO5T5 TO
THEREBY ENHANCE OPPORTUNTTIES FOR MINORITY AND OTHER SMALL
CONTRACTORS. �
II-F 911 TELEPHONE TAX
The Department of Administration has the authority to impose a fee of up to 34 cents per
month on every telephone bill in the state. Currently, the fee is set at 18 cents per phone line
per month. The funds generated by this fee amount to several millions of dollars per year. The
Department uses these funds to pay the recurring monthly costs to the 90 + phone companies
in the state for the costs of the dedicated phone circuits.
Bills have been introduced which would allow the surcharge to grow to $1.00. The excess fee was
intended to develop capital in those outstate counties to implement enhanced 911 service over and
above the basic 911 service they already have.
THE AMM SUPPORTS ALLOWING THE CURRENT 911 ACCESS FEE ON TELEPHONE
BILLS TO BE USED FOR COSTS OTHER THAN JUST ENHANCED UPGRADE FROM
BASIC SERVICE AND THAT ANY FEE IN EXCESS OF 34 CENTS BE RETURNED TO
THE MUNICIPALTTY WHERE IT WA5 COLLECTED.
14
II-G 800 MHz RADIO 5YSTEM
For the past several years one or more committees have been studying the possibi
developing a metropolitan communications system that would make better utilizat
radio channels and provide a capability to allow much greater communicadons ca�
among many metro area users. The Metropolitan Radio Systems Planning Comm
(MRSPC) is nearing completion of its report due to the legislature February 1, 19
Information to date suggests that if there is not a coordinated metro system there �
a signi.ficant shortage of channels, a plariforation of non compatible systems, as w
greater overall cost. The final plan will have both cost and operational impact on
However, the details of these impacts as well as possible alternatives have either �
finalized or had hearings.
THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES STRONG
RECOMMENDS THAT THE LEGISLATURE TAKE NO ACTION TO E;
AN 800 MHz TRUNKED RADIO SYSTEM FOR THE METROPOLITAN ,
THE TARGETED USERS OF THIS RADIO SYSTEM, INCLUDING CITD
HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW AND COMMENT ON THE POT�
OPERATIONAL AND COST IMPLICATIONS.
IF THE 1995 LEGISLATURE DOES MOVE FORWARD WITH STATUT(
IMPLEMENTATION OF AN 800 MHz TRUNKED RADIO SYSTEM FOR
METROPOLITAN AREA, THEN THE AMM BOARD OF DIRECTORS Sl
ADOPT APPROPRIATE POLICY BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITE
i
-CITIES 5HOULD NOT BE FORCED TO MODIFY THEIR CURRI
of
of limited
�uld develop
lasa
[•1-�- 1
'ABLISH
tEA UNTIL
. HAVE
SYSTEMS OR PURCHASE NEW EQUIPMENT PREMATURELY; I
!
-THE SYSTEM SHOULD PROVIDE A PHASED TRANSITION SO HAT
THERE IS GUARANTEED,UNINTERRUPTED SERVICE;
-THE SYSTEM SHOULD BE TECHNICALLY CAPABLE OF Al
COMMUNITIES THE FLEXIBILITY TO FORM VARIOUS
COORDINATED ARRANGEMENTS FOR DISPATCHING AND
SERVICE PROVISION; AND .
+
-THE GOVERNANCE BODY FOR 800 MHz SHOULD BE REPA
OF ENTITIE5/USERS THAT ULTIMATELY MUST BEAR THE
SHOULD NOT BE DOMINATED BY ANY ONE GROUP.
15
'ATIVE
BUT
HOU5ING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND LAND USE
PAGE 16 THROUGH 31
�
' III
i •
; HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND LAND
A. HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOODS
i
The housing problem for persons currently unable to afford market rate housing
mitigated if a11 levels of government and the private sector, including non-profit
together and if each contributes a fair share to the solution.
Each level of government should contribute to help solve the problem and each lev�
contributioris should be of the kind it is best suited to make. The Federal and/or St
should provide direct financial subsidies for housing for low and moderate income
The Federal and State Governments also have the responsibility to provide a tax cli
which the private sector can produce and maintain rental units that are affordable tc
moderate income households. The State should also grant local units of governmenl
authority and flexibility to conduct the kind of housing programs that best meets th�
needs. !
The Metropolitan Council should continue to place high priority on housing planni
Metropolitan Area and provide specific guidance to the public and private sectors �
can make rational decisions relative to future housing needs. The Council should c�
aggressive in seeking innovative ways to create housing opportunities for low inco�
�
Loca1 units �of government also have a major role to play. Local controls constitute
portion of the total cost of housing but local units should not establish requirement
beyond what is necessary for the protection of health, safety and welfare. Local un
also work with the private and non-profit sectors, Minnesota Housing Finance AgE
Metropolitan Council and Counties to make the best use of existing tools to produc
housing. �
The private sector also needs to help make more housing affordable. For exarr
cities where' there are few requirements on lot size, house size, having a garage,
developers often impose private covenants which greatly increase the cost of ho
covenants often allow only larger homes having garages to be constructed, and �
more expensive exterior materials and landscaping. The private sector must acti
collaborate with cities to avoid increasing the cost of housing, and to forego co�
tend to increase these costs. '
�
Decision makers at all levels must become more cognizant of their actions, policies,
which have an undesirable impact on housing costs.
�
16
best be
�ps, work
's
Levels
nate in
low and
the
ir diverse
; for the
that both
itinue to be
e persons.
>ut a small
which go
s should
icy,
affordable
even in
;. These
require
its which
id decisions
A-1. EXAMINE LOCAL REQUIREMENTS THAT AFFECT HOUSING COSTS.
Local requirements, and practices if excessive, can add to the cost of producing affordable
housing.
IT I5 THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CITY OFFICIALS TO ACTIVELY SUPPORT
DIVERSE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THEIR
CITIES. CITY OFFICIALS SHOULD PERIODICALLY REVIEW CITY
REQUIl2EMENTS (ZONING AND 5UBDIVISION ORDINANCES, ETC.) TO ASSURE
THAT THESE REQUIREMENTS DO NOT INHIBIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF
AFFORDABLE HOUSING OR BECOME EXCLUSIONARY.
A-2. PRACTICES 'BY OTHER LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT WHIC�I AFFECT
HOUSING COSTS.
Decision makers at other levels of government must become more cognizant of actions they
take which have an impact on housing costs. These actions in themselves may be worthwhile
and beneficial, but when implemented result in increased housing costs. Examples of this type
of action would include such things as the sewer availability charge, restricted growth policies,
building and energy codes, environmental rules such as lead abatement, asbestos removal, etc.
The impact of these actions often have the most impact on lower cost housing and can lead to
abandonment or vacancies.
HOUSING COSTS ARE OFTEN IMPACTED BY ACTIONS OF OTHER 'LEVELS OF
GOVERNMENT (FEDERAL, STATE, REGIONAL). THESE LEVELS SHOULD
EXAMINE CURRENT AND PENDING REGULATIONS AND POLICIES TQ
DETERMINE IF CHANGES CAN BE MADE TO 1VIAKE HOU�I1�1� iVIORE
AFFORDABLE.
A-3. MANDATORY LAND USE STANDARD5.
�
Uniform standazds for housing style, type and size are not appropriate because of the great
diversity among cities and differences within cities relative to density of development,
topography, age of housing stock, the mix of housing values, and the level of municipal
services which are provided. However, land use standards which help encourage affordable
housing can be avoided by developers through the use of private covenants which require
building lazger, and more expensive homes.
Land use regulation is one of the tools used by city officials to protect the health, safety, welfare,
and interests of the city's residents. .
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD NOT PASS LEGISLATION WHICH MANDATES
UNIFORM ZONING AND SUBDIVISION STANDARDS OR WHICH REMOVES
ADDITIONAL LAND USE REGULATION AUTHORITY FROM LOCAL UNI'TS OF
17
GOVERNMENT. CITIES SHOULD RETAIN THE AUTHORITY TO REGI
LOCATION, SIZE, AMOUNT, AND TYPE OF HOUSING WITHIN THEIR
BOUNDARIES. NO LEGI5LATIVE INITIATIVE NEEDED. CTTIES DO I�
RESPONSIBILITY, HOWEVER, TO PROVIDE A CHOICE OF AFFORDA:
HOUSING, OPPORTUNITIES.
A-4. STATE HOUSING POLICY.
�The state sliould be a more active participant in providing funding for housing neec
expected that allocation of state resources would be based on an. overall state housi
which would provide the necessary tools for implementation. The Legislature need�
for financing strategies which will carry out the long range goals for providing and
affordable housing opportunities. There are acute needs for decent, affordable housi
Minnesota as well as in the seven county area. The state housing policy should ena
assist local governments, private and non-profit developers to initiate affordable hoi
governments should participate in the formulation of a state housing policy which �
to support local housing goals.
I �
THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT THE STATE PROVIDE DIRECT FU1vI
FINANCIAL INCENTIVES NEEDED TO ASSIST CITIES IN MEETING LO
HOUSING NEEDS IN THE STATE.
DIRECT FUNDING SHOULD COME IN THE FORM OF GRANT5 AND I
FROM STATE REVENUE SOURCES.
;
FINANCIAL INCENTIVES PROVIDED THROUGH THE STATE TAX PO
5HOULD BE USED TO BENEFIT THE MAINTENANCE AND DEVELOP]
AFFORDABLE HOUSING. INCENTIVES THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDER
NOT LIMITED TO:
!
STATE LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT
SALE5 TAX EXEMPTIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND
OPERATION �
; OF LOW INCOME HOUSING BY PUBLIC AGENCIES
THE STATE LEGISLATURE IN ALLOCATING RESOURCES FOR HOUSIP
SHOULD NOT SPECIFICALLY TARGET AN ACTIVITY AND THEREBY S
SMALL AMOUNTS OF FUNDS FOR MANY DIFFERENT SMALL PROGR�
JUST INCREA5ES STATE AND LOCAL COST IN ESTABLISHING RULES,
APPLYING FOR AND ADMINISTERING THE PROGRAM5. INSTEAD TH�
LEGISLATURE SHOULD SET GENERAL POLICY PRIORITIES FOR TH�
STATE FUNDS AND ALLOW FOR LARGER POOLS OF FUNDS BY WHIC
LOCAL, NON-PROFIT AND FOR-PROFIT DEVELOPERS CAN APPLY BA;
THEIR SPECIFIC ACTIVITIES.
! .
i 18
TE THE
VE A
�. It is
g policy
to provide
in rural
and
�g. Local
be used
G AND
� TERM
JT OF
BUT
:T ASIDE
VIS. THIS
AND
USE OF
.�
THE MHFA AND THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SHOULD COLLABORATE AND
COOPERATE TO PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND INFORMATIOI�i ABOUT
STATE AND FEDERALLY FUNDED HOUSING PROGRAMS SO THAT THEY CAN BE
MORE READILY ACCESSED BY CITIES.
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD REPEAL THE STATE LAW THAT REQUIRES 1 TO 1
REPLACEMENT WITHIN THE CENTRAL CITIE5, OF LOW INCOME HOUSING THAT
HAS: ���':BEEN REMOVED AND REPLACE IT WITH A CONCEPT ALLOWING
REPLACEMENT OUTSIDE OF THE CENTRAL CTTIES. THE REGULATION5 SHOULD
NOT REQUIItE REPLACING A HOUSE THAT IS SO DETERIORATED THAT IT DOE5
NOT SERVE A5 A LOW INCOME I1NIT.
A-5 LOCAL HOUSING POLICY
There is a great diversity among cities in the metropolitan area. Some cides need more housing�
for low income persons while other cities need housing for moderate to upper income persons.
Cities should have the authority to promote whichever kind of housing is in the public purpose
and best interest of a particular city while attempting to provide housing opportunities to
households of all income levels. Cities need to have a greater flexibility in financing their
housing goals if they are to meet the intent of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act.
CITIES, SHOULD BE GRANTED SUFFICIENT AUTHORITY AND FLEXIBILITY BY
THE LEGISLATURE TO CONDUCT AND FINANCE HOUSIN� PROGRAMS THAT
MEET THEIR INDIVIDUAL HOUSING NEEDS. LOCAL FUNDS CAN BE USED TO
LEVERAGE FEDERAL, STATE AND METROPOLITAN RE50URCES WHEN THEY
CAN MEET COMMON POLICY GOAL5.
IT IS NECESSARY TO EXPAND FINANCIAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE AT THE
LOCAL LEVEL. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO:
-REMOVAL OF HOUSING AUTHORITY LEVY LIMITS
-REINSTATING THE STATE DEED AND MORTGAGE TRANSFER TAX
EXEMPTION FOR PUBLIC AGENCIES
-ALLOWING CITIES TO IMPOSE IMPACT FEES
A-6 METROPOLITAN HOUSING POLICY
The Metropolitan Council should continue to place high priority on housing planning for the
Metropolitan Area and provide specific guidance to the public and private sectors so that both
can make rational decisions relative to future housing needs. The Council should continue to
be aggressive in seeking innovative ways to create housing opportunities for low income
persons.
The regional Housing Policy developed by the Metropolitan Council must take into account the
i �!:
necessary linkages between housing, jobs and job training, transit and human serv:
lower income persons. Many of the needed linkages are the type discussed in the '
section of Policy III-A-7 Neighborhood Liveability.
;
� The Council should work in partnership with local governmental units to help meei
of housing needs of people at various life-cycle needs; broader locational choice tl
the metropolitan area for people of all income levels; and support quality housing
rehabilita.tion and renovation. '
THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT:
,
(A) THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL DEVELOP A REGIONAL HOU�
POLICY PLAN WHICH CONSIDERS THE LINKAGE NEEDED BF
HOUSING, JOBS AND JOB TRAINING, TRANSIT, HUMAN SER
NEEDS, ETC. '
(B) THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL PROVIDE ONGOING RESEAR�
ANALYSIS TO PROVIDE COMMUNPTIES UP-TO-DATE INFORM
REGIONAL AND LOCAL HOUSING AFFORDABILITY NEEDS A1
AVAILABILITY AND MARKET TRENDS.
� �
(C) A METROPOLITAN ENTERPRISE FUND BE ESTABLISHED BY '
• LEGISLATURE: �
1) CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES REGARDING THE OPERATION
FUND SHOULD BE CONSI5TENT WITH THE METROPOLITAN CI
REGIONAL BLUEPRINT AND HOUSING POLICY PLAN. INCLUD
NOT LI1VdI7'ED TO CRITERIA WHICH WILL ALLOW FOR THE C:
OF CONTAMINATED SOILS, HOUSING REHABILITATION AND
REDEVELOPMENT, CONSTRUCTION OF NEW AFFORDABLE HI
AND SHALLOW RENT SUBSIDY.
,
� .
needs of
the range
AND
[ON ON
THI5
1CII.'S
f l.� U 1
►N-UP
USING '
2) POSSIBLE FUNDING SOURCES FOR THE ENTERPRISE FUND INCLUD]
AN INCREASE IN THE DEED AND/OR MORTGAGE REGISTRY TAXES; A
NOMINAL UNIFORM METROPOLITAN PROPERTY TAX; A SMALL ADD-
ON METROPOLITAN SALES TAX; A NOMINAL METROPOLITAN
PAYROLL OR ADD ON INCOME TAX, IMPACT FEES, ETC. �
3) THE REVENUE SOURCES FOR THE ENTERPRISE FUND SHO
CONSIST OF A COMBINATION OF STATE GENERAL FUND
APPROPRIATION5 AND METROPOLITAN RAISED REVENUE.
A-711�11EIGHBORHOOD LIVEABILITY
20
Rapidly evolving social, demographic, economic and behavioral changes are converging on
many cities creating new challenges that exceed their capacity to deal effectively with their
new environments.
The challenges cities face, such as deteriorating neighborhoods, crime, and drugs, need the
cooperadve efforts of public, private and business interests to solve. moderate income families,
The problems continue to grow eventhough cities have taken efforts to face these challenges.
Cities should take the lead in developing local and regional strategies that will assist them in
dealing with growing neighborhood problems. These strategies should include the following
major categories: -
1. Physical and structural deterioration of the neighborhood.
2. Social welfare of the neighborhood.
3. Educational opportunities.
PHYSICAL AND STRUCTURAL DETERIORATION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD:
a. Cities need to evaluate the demographic impact on their housing stock and plan for
future rehabilitation or reuse. The demographic impacts may include declining home
values, delayed or non-maintenance of housing stock, foreclosed or abandoned housing
and the changing of neighborhood character (i.e. An owner-base to a tenant-base).
b. Cities need to plan for continued upgrading of public facilities (i.e. streets, utilities,
parks) even in the face of declining values.
c. Cities need to plan for regulatory enforcement at levels needed to :r,aintain
neighborhood quality which. can be an effective relatively low cost long term strategy
' . for maintaining neighborhood quality.
d. Cities need to plan for and encourage neighborhood residents' participation in the
preservation of the city's neighborhoods. Neighborhood pride can become one of the
strongest tools that cities can tap into.
e. Cities need to expand their resources and plan for the targering of resources to
accomplish their long-term strategy for neighborhood preservation. This will require
coordinated efforts at the federal, state, regional and local level.
f. Cities need to strengthen their ability to take appropriate legal actions in a swift manner
to eliminate deteriorating structures in a neighbothood �
g. Cities need to plan for appropriate public facilities and encourage neighborhood
resident's participation in recreational pursuits and activities.
21
h. Cities should actively encourage apartment owners and managers to fo
to create a forum by which owners, managers, city officials, and other
may work cooperatively to establish a climate that would achieve an o
relationship among all participants and encourage livable apartment en
;
SOCIAL , WELFARE OF NEIGHBORHOODS:
+
a. Cities need to evaluate those social issues that directly impact the liv
neighborhood (aging, child care, transportation, job training, domestic
plan for long-range systems that will strengthen the liveability of nei;
�
b. Cities need to become more familiar with the social welfare system and �
with state and county agencies to emphasize the need of stabilizing neigh
the family units within those neighborhoods.
c.
�
organize
ted parties
in a
etc.) and
closely
�ods and
Cities need to strengthen the cooperation of ind.ividuals and families within �the
neighborhood to support city initiatives dealing with crime and drug aware ess, public
health issues (i.e. garbage houses, animal infestation, etc.) and domestic ab se.
Cities need to plan for services to neighborhoods that will allow for afforda le day care,
transportation and job opportunities. The impact of lack of these services h�s the
greatest impact on the low income and elderly households within an.y neigh�orhood.
e. Cities need. to develop programs and/or participate in the development of st�te and
regional programs to lessen the impact that poverty has on the destabilizatio of a
neighborhood. These programs are needed to deal with the broad range of i sues
rather than one specific activity �
,
EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES:
a. Cities need to encourage, participate in and strengthen the school systems
education outreach programs. These programs provide an opportunity to c
school and city efforts to strengthen the liveability of neighborhoods.
b. Cides need to work closely with secondary and post secondary education
encourage job training programs.
THE AMM RECOMMENDS:
1. WHERE LEGISLATION IS DIRECTED TO ASSIST LOW INCOI
AND CHILDREN IN POVERTY, LEGISLATORS KECOGNIZE Z
FOR LINKAGE BETWEEN HOUSING AND HUMAN SERVICES,
TRAINING, HEALTH CARE AND TRAN5PORTATION. WHEN 7
LEGISLATURE INSIDERS LOW INCOME PROGRAMS, IT SH�
22
to
PERSONS
NEED
BS AND
TREAT
THESE ACTIVITIES IN A COMPREHENSIVE MANNER.
2. THAT THE LEGISLATURE ENACT NECESSARY LEGISLATION TO
IDENTIFY AND ELIMINATE ANY BARRIERS INCLUDING WELFARE
REFORM THAT WOULD ACT TO DETER PERSONS FROM ACHIEVING
THEIIt GOAL OF ECONOMIC AND PERSONAL SUCCESS FOR THEM
AND/OR THEIR FAMILY.
3. THAT THE GOVERNOR DIRECT ALL DEPARTMENT HEADS WHOSE
ACTIVITIES MAY IMPACT HOUSING AND HUMAN SERVICES TO:
A. COORDINATE THEIIt OPERATIONS SO THAT THEY IDENTIFY AND
REMOVE ANY CONFLICTING REQUIItEMENTS.
B. IDENTIFY AND REMOVE THO5E BARRIERS �'HAT ARE FELT TO
RESTRICT A PERSON'S ABILITY TO ACHIEVE ECONOMIC AND
PERSONAL SUCCESS.
A-8 STATE AND/OR COUNTY LICENSED RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES (GROUP
HOMES) �
The A1VIM believes that persons with disabilities are entitled to live in the least restrictive
possible environment and should have a range of residential choices throughout the state. The
AMM also believes that residential based facilities (i.e. Group Homes) should not be
concentrated. Over-concentration of such facilities could have a negative impact on the
community and on the facility residents. The AMM believes that the principles cor_*uined in
this policy are very appropriate and any state legislation pursued shoul� �;,i conflict wi�h the
AMM principles.
The residents of residential based facilities come from our communities and the AMM
believes that cities as one of the major institutions of our society have a responsibility to be a
part of the solution by welcoming such facilities on a fair share and rational basis. The AMM
believes that cities have a responsibility to be part of the solution, but it also believes that the
state has the major responsibility to assure that the residents living in residential based facilities
receive care and supervision appropriate to the extent of their disability or their need to be
housed in a group facility.
The state's deinstiturionalization policy is directly linked to the need for more residential
based care facilities in our cities and the state has the responsibility to provide sufficient
funding to assure adequate care and supervision of the residents placed in such facilities.
The AMM also believes that the state has an obligation to screen clients, particularly in the
corrections area, so that persons placed in residential based facilities are not a danger to
themselves, fellow residents, or the community. .
23
�
THE AMM BELIEVES THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLES SHOULD BE IN
RULE TO REGULATE RE5IDENTIAL BASED FACILITIES:
-STATE AND COUNTY AGENCIES MUST PROVIDE TIMELY NOTIFIC�
CITIES WHEN A RESIDENTIAL FACILITY LICENSE IS REQUESTED T
IS5UED OR RENER'ED IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THE CITY ADEQUATI
OPPORTUNI'I'Y TO RESPOND. CITIES AL50 NEED TO BE AWARE OF
FACILITIE5 'PO KNOW WHAT SPECIAL CARE IS BEING GIVEN RESII
CASE OF PUBLIC SAFETY EMERGENCIES.
-STEPS MUST BE TAKEN TO AVOID THE CLUSTERING OF COMMU]
RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES ATTRIBUTABLE TO ECONOMIC, GEOGR�
PROGRAMMATIC EXPEDIENCE. STANDARD5 OF NONCONCENTRAT
THE STATE OR FOR COUNTY-ISSUED RFP'S SHOULD BE ESTABLIS:
CITIES SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO REGULATE THE DISTANCE
GROUP HOMES IN A CONSISTENT MANNER.
-THERE MUST BE A REALISTIC ONGOING SCREENING PROCESS TO
THAT PERSONS PLACED IN A RESIDENTIAL FACILIT�' WILL BENEF
SUCH LIVING ENVIRONMENT AND WILL NOT BE A DANGER TO TH:
OR OTHERS. THE LICENSING AUTHORITY MUST BE RESPONSIBLE
REMOVING ANY PERSONS FOUND INCAPABLE OF CONTINUING IN;
ENVIItONMENT.
, .
-FACILITIES LICENSED BY THE CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT SHOL
BE EXEMPT FROM REASONABLE LOCAL LAND USE REGULATIONS.
:
LAW OR
ION TO
BE
IN
C OR
FOR
, ALL
T FROM
;MSELVES
iOR
UCH
NOT
-A FAIR SHARE CONCEPT AND FORMULA SHOULD BE CONSIDERED I WITHIN
THE METROPOLITAN AREA, BUT SUCH CONCEPT AND FORMULA
COGNIZAN'I' OF OTHER FACTORS INCLUDING TRANSPORTATION
JOBS AVAILABILITY, AND OTHER NEEDED SUPPORT SERVICES.
-THE LICENSING AUTHORITY AND/OR THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD
SOME LATITUDE TO CITIES IN SITING SUCH FACII,ITIES IN ORDER
; PROVIDE LOCATIONAL SETTINGS THAT WILL BEST MEET THE NEE
PROVIDERS, FACII.TfY RESIDENT5, THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE C(
AS A WHOLE. '
i .
i
A-9 LICENSED RESIDENTIAL FACILTTIES (GROUP HOME5) INSPECT:
j
Cities are frequently requested by the state fire marshal to inspect group homes anc
' facilities, which the state has the responsibility for. Also, there are inspections mad
county and/or state for health and licensing purposes.
24
BE
1�f1��
OF THE
day care
by the
Cities do not care to provide this service since they 1) do not get compensation for perfornung
the inspection, and 2) expose themselves to liability. if the city is involved in the inspection.
THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT:
THE STATE AND/OR COUNTIES PROVIDE ALL THE IN5PECTION REQUIRED BY
STATE LAW.
IF THE STATE AND/OR COUNTIES WISH TO HAVE CITIES PROVIDE THE
INSPECTION ON THEIIt BEHALF, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST APPLY:
CITIE5 WOULD BE FAII2LY COMPENSATED FOR THEIR WORK.
CITIES WOULD HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO ORDER COMPLIANCE AND/OR
PROHIBIT THE FACILITY FROM OPENING UNTIL �'HERE IS CO1ViPI,IANCE.
THE STATE AND COUNTIES WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RISK
MANAGEMENT CONCERNS AND THE CITIES WOULD BE EXEMPT FROM
LITIGATION THAT MAY OCCUR.
III-B ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Cities have an interest in the maintenance of and appropriate enhancements to the economic
base of their respective communities. It is the community's economic base which provides;
a.) the tax base and other revenue sources which support
the general operations of cities, counties and school
districts;
b.) the employment of some or a substantial number of
residents and,
c.) the means by which the populous is housed.
All metropolitan communides address economic development when it's translated to physical
development through their localland use regulations with the individual communities striving for
"orderly development". As a group however, metropolitan communities differ as to development
needs and view points, with each community's needs subject to a number of variables.
As noted economic development for local governments is not just a matter of more tax base for
the community but entails tools to promote, regulate and service the development. Promotional
means include Housing and Redevelopment Authorides, Economic Development Authorities,
Port Authorities, tax increment financing, revenue and general obligadon bonds, condemnation
and the Star Cities Program. Regulation includes its comprehensive planning and land use
25
functions. Servicing include water, sewer, streets and other municipal services.
B-1 CITIES RE-DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
RESPONSIBILITIES: .
;
,
In view of the fact that cities have the primary responsibility for economic develo
including redevelopment, they need fiscal tools so they can address these issues o
and effective basis. The state should acknowledge the valuable role cities play in
and maintaining the economic health of the state.
A STATE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED TO
JOB CREATION, REDEVELOPMENT AND PREVENTION OF BLIGH�T A
POLLUTION CLEAN UP, AND PROVISION OF ADEQUATE HOUSING
OPPORTUNTTIES. THE 5TATE SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE CITIE5 AS 7
PRIMARY GOVERNMENT UNIT RESPONSIBLE FOR�IMPLEMENTING '
STRATEGIE5 AND FOR LAND USE CONTROLS, AND SHOULD DEVELI
TOOLS CITIES NEED TO ACCOMPLISH THESE OBJECTIVES. IN THE
PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE STATE AND CITIE5, CITIE5 SHOULD �
CHARGED WITH LOCALLY ADMII�IISTERING A DEVELOPMENT POL]
CREATED BY THE LEGISLATURE AND GOVERNOR.
,
B-2. RE-INS'I'ATE/�XPAND URBAN REVITALIZATION ACTION PROGF
;
One of the'major keys for reducing poverty in decaying areas is to provide access tc
jobs such as those associated with manufacturing enterprises. It is important to prov:
or other tools to help retain or introduce manufacturing businesses into economica
areas. ' '
The most effective program that the central cities have had at the state level has
Revitalization Action Program (U.R.A.P.). This program was very easy to admi
' Many suburban communities with deteriorating jobs base and aging housing stock
legislation.!
�
a timely
OMOTE
DECAY,
THE
good paying
ie incentives
lv distressed
the Urban
similar
THE AMM URGES APPROVAL OF A NEW WORKABLE STATE ENTERPRI5E ZONE
OR A MANUFACTURING JOB OPPORTUNITY ZONE INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR
CITIES WHO5E MANUFACTURING JOB BASE I5 ERODING. I
T'I�E AMM AL50 URGE5 THE LEGISLATURE TO ENACT A NEW V�
THE URAP PitOGRAM THAT INCLUDES ALL CTTIES WITH THE
CHARACTERI5TIC5 AND DEMOGRAPHICS THAT MEET DEFINED C:
SUCH CRITERIA SHOULD INCLUDE FACTORS SUCH AS POVERTY
AGE OF HOUSING, UNEMPLOYMENT RATES, INCOME LEVELS, ET
26
OF
TES,
WE ALSO RECOMMEND THAT ONCE A CTTY HA5 BEEN DESIGNATED A URAP
ELIGIBLE COMMU1vITY, IT BECOMES AUTOMATICALLY ELIGIBLE FOR ANY
BENEFITS THAT WOULD BE AVAILABLE UNDER ANY FEDERAL OR STATE
ENTERPRISE ZONE LEGISLATION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROGRAM TARGETED
TO CITIE5 WHOSE CHARACTERISTICS AND DEMOGRAPHICS INDICATE
THERE ARE NEEDS THAT CANNOT BE MET WITHOUT STATE AND OR
FEDERAL ASSI5TANCE.
B-3 EQUAL TREATMENT` OF CITIES.
The AMM believes that all cities irrespective of size or location should be treated fairly with
respect to the availability and use of state authorized economic development programs,
including redevelopment tools, and programs and other state funding.
NEW OR REVISED PROGRAlVIS DESIGNED TO ADDRESS SPECIFIC ECONOMIC
CIRCUMSTANCES WITHIN CITIES OR COUNTIES SHOULD USE PROBLEM
DEFINITION AS THE CRITERIA FOR PARTICIPATION AS OPPOSED TO
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION, SIZE OF CITY CLASS, ETC. �
B-4 TAX INCR�MENT FINANCING.
Tax Increment Finance (TIF) has enabled cities to plan and cany out housing; economic
development, and redevelopment projects on their owri initiative. TIF represented, prior to
1990, the most feasible and effective strategy or tool exercised by cities to preserve and
improve their own physical and economic environments. TIF is virtually the only tool
available to most cities for posidve self intervention to curb the spread of blight and tu
encourage and manage sound economic development which is'so vital ±� �rovide jobs and to
maintain a healthy ta�c base. '
Over the past several years, however, TIF authority has been seriously limited, and, as a
result, the ability of cities to engage in needed development and redevelopment has been
sharply reduced. The state needs to acknowledge that cities are the primary governmental unit
responsible for economic developmerit to create jobs and help stabilize the state's economy,
eliminate blight and decay, develop affordable rental and owner-occupied housing, and clean up
pollution within cities. TIF has proven to be the most effective tool for cities in fulfilling tliese
needs, and some of the restrictions need to be removed to allow these efforts.
The LGA/HACA aid penalty shdiild not apply to all TTF districts. If the Legislature is not
willing to remove it, cities should not be restricted in theu means of paying for the penalty.
The general fund of a city should not be responsible for this penalty, and the Legislature
should remove the prohibition on developer payment of the penalty.
TIF should be improved and inust be preserveci for use by all cities urespective of geographical
location and any limitations should be based on demographic criteria.
27
THE AMM ENCOURAGES THE LEGISLATURE TO MAKE POSITIVE
TO THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING LAWS:
-ALLOW POOLING FOR REDEVELOPMENT AND POLLUTION DISTRI
-ALLOW CREATION OF POLLUTION DISTRICTS FOR CLEAN-UP OF
CONTAMINATED SOILS AND LANDFILLS.
-ELIMINATE THE LGA AND HACA PENALTY FOR REDEVELO
POLLUTION DISTRICTS.
-PROVIDE AUTHORITY FOR AN EFFECTIVE, WORKABLE MANUFA
TIF DISTRICT THAT RETAINS JOBS FOR A LOCALE OR ADDS TO 7
JOB;::BASE. �
1
-ALLOW REDEVELOPMENT AND RENEWAL DI5TRICTS TO BE REL
AS A POLLUTION DI5TRICT IF CONTAMINATION REQUIItING SIG
CLEAN UP COSTS IS FOUND. '
,
� B-5. RESPONSIBLE USE OF TIF.
a '
,
The state continues to impose restrictions on the use of TIF because of the percept
causes unnecessary competition between individual cities and between areas of the
There is also perception that cities are "played against each other" when developer;
considering projects and that development would take place without TIF. Counties
also feel they should become more involved in the decision making process.
i
GOVERNMENTS THAT U5E TIF OR OTHER DEVELOPMENT TOOLS S]
ESTABLISH A POLICY TO PROTECT AGAINST COMPETITION WITH 1
MINNESOTA CITIES AND SHOULD INSTITUTE A DEVELOPER DISCLC
PROCESS SO THAT THE CITY IS ABLE TO RECEIVE INFORMATION �
DEVELOPERS CONCERNING NEGOTIATIONS WITH OTHER COMMUr
CITIES SHOULD DEVELOP AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEG
CONSULTATION WITH COUNTIES AND SCHOOLS. T�IE "REVIEW A11
COMMENT" REQUIREMENTS OF THE CURRENT TAX INCREMENT Fl
LAW SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE USED TO EDUCATE AND INVOLVE
' I.00AL GOVERNMENT5 AND LOCAL LEGISLATORS ABOUT .PROPOSI
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. COUNTIES AND 5CHOOL BOARDS SHOU
RESPOND TO THESE OVERTURES FOR EVALUATION AND PARTICIP�
� AND SHOULD TAKE ADVANTAGE OF ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATIOI
OPPORTUNITIES. �
,
�
B-6 OTHER DEVELOPMENT-TOOLS. �
!
� �
� , .
�
:
ES
5TATE'S
sNATED
CANT
that it
are
and schools
!�
IN
TION,
Minnesota Cities liave tlie prime go'verrimental responsibility foT econoiiiic developmerit ,but
they have very few tools to cairyout that resporisi6ility. Tlie major existirig tool is Taic
Incremen� Finaiicing (TIF) aiid its effectiveness Has been diminisheci by legislative actioris iri
recent years. The AMM lielieve additiorial fools are neecled.
CITIES SHOULD BE G1VEN AUTHORITY FOR PROPERTY TAX ABATEIVIENTS AS
ANOTHER ECONOIVIIC DEVELOPMENT TOOL. THE PRECEDENT FOR
ABATEMENTS HAS ALREADY BEEN ESTABLISHED BY THE "THIS OLD HOIJSE"
PROGRAM, THE CONT'AIVIINATION TAX, AND THE ENTERPRISE ZONE
PROGRAM. IN ADDITIUN, MINNESOTA COUNTIE5 SUPPORT AUTHORIZATION
FOR AN ABATEMENT PROGRAM.
THE LEGISLATIJRE SHOLTLD ESTABLISH A"`I'HIS OLD STOREFRONT"
PROGRAIVI AS ANOTHER ECONOIVIIC DEVELOPIVIENT TOOL AND PROVIDE
LIMITED PROPERTY TAX ABATEIVIENTS TO PROPEBTY OWNERS
REHABII;ITATING THEIR COMIVIERCIAL PROPERTIES. A� IN "THIS OLD
HOUSE;" ABATEIVIENT5 SHOULD BE RESTRICTED TO PROPERTIES 'I'HAT ARE
AT LEAST 35 YHEARS OLD; WITH AN ElVIPHASIS OIV PROPER`TIES THAT ARE 70
YEARS OLD OR OLDER:
THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY GRANT PROGRAM FUNDING SHOULD BE
INCREASED TO $10 MILLION ANNUALLY OR TO THE LEVEL RECOIVIMENDED
BY THE DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND ECONOIVIIC DEVELOPMENT (DTED);
WHICHEVER IS GREATER; AND CLEAR RULES ESTABLISHED TO GOVERN ITS
USE. THE STATE AND FEDERAL FIJNDS TO SUPPORT THIS PROGRAM SHOULD
ALSO BE SPREAD OVER THE YEAR TO HELP AS5iJ12E THAT PROJEC7'�
ACROSS THE STATE HAVE ACCESS TO THE GRANTS.
THE FEDERAL GOVERIVMENT SHOULD SUBSTAIVTIALLY INCREASE THE
CURRENT APPROPRIATION FOR THE CO1VIlVIIJNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
.
GRANT PROGRAM; AND SHOULD SIMPLIF`Y THE APPLICATION PROCES5 AND
REDUCE THE PAPERWORK BURDEN5. �
CONGRESS SHOULD REIVIOVE THE CAPS THAT HAS BEEN PLACED ON
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMEIVT BONDS AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE
EXTEIVSIVE ELIGIBILITY REQiJIltE1VIENTS 1VOW ADEQUATELY LIMIT THEIIt
USE.
B=7 DEVELOPIVYENT OF POLLiJTED LANDS
Most Minne"sota cities have contaminated sites within tlieir Boundaries tliat remain
underdeveloped and polluteci because of the num�eT of obstacles that prevent local government
action. Among the ioadblocks are liability issues and firiaricing of up-frorit costs for clean-up.
Developers are 'reluctant 'to expose `tlieiriselves to liabiliry: Clean-iip costs ofteii exceecl the
29
value of the land precluding incentive for private sector intervention. Public sector
critical. �
;
The Legislature did pass the Land Recycling Act of 1992 which should be of some
law is designed to promote the transfer and reuse of contaminated land by offering
exemption from liability to those who are not otherwise liable and who voluntarily
site. The new law also provides that once a response action is sadsfactorily comple
PCA Commissioner will issue a certificate of completion. �
ubsidy is
help. The
�n
;leanup a
�d. the
The 1993 tax law also made a step toward developing a pollution cleanup program�and
acknowledged that tax increment financing (TI� is an appropriate tool to provide a portion of
the funding. The AMM however, opposes the Legislature's decision that cities must use
general taxes and fees from their city residents to provide a portion of the cleanup funding to
be eligible for contamination grants and use of 'TIF authority. � (
THE AMM SUPPORTS LEGISLATION THAT WOULD:
I
-CREATE° ADDITIONAL FINANCING METHODS TO ADEQUATELY F
STATEWIDE CLEANUP PROGRAM AND INCREASE THE FUNDING
STATE5 CONTAMINATION CLEAN-UP GRANT PROGRAM.
, �
DA
R THE
-REQUIRE THAT CONDEMNATION COMMISSIONERS CONSIDER THE COST OF
CORRECTING POLLUTION PROBLEMS IN DETERMINING THE FINAL AWARD
VALUE OF THE PROPERTY.
�
-CREATE DIFFERENT STANDARDS OF CLEAN-UP, BASED UPON THE INTENDEI
REUSE OF POLLUTED PROPERTY.
-ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT TO MATCH A PORTION OF THE
GRANT WITH GENERAL FUNDS.
-AUTHORIZE CREATION OF TIF POLLUTION DISTRICTS (SEE
B- 8 BUILDING PERMIT FEE SURCHARGE
Local units of government levy a one half percent surcharge on building permits w
to the State to operate the State Building Codes and Standazds Division. Until the i
Legislature changed the law at the request of the Governor, any excess fees over ac
operating costs were proportionately rebated to local units to help pay for Building
training and continuing education costs. Local units of government are facing toug�
times and rieed every available resource, especially that which could be considered
money. j '
THE AMM RECOMMEND5 12EINSTATING THE LANGUAGE
30
Y III-B3).
iich is paid
991
tual
Officials
financial
local
�1G THAT
UNUSED BUILDING PERMIT SURCHARGE FEES IN EXCESS OF STATE
BUILDING CODE DIVISION COSTS BE RETURNED TO LOCAL UNIT5 OF
GOVERNMENT.
III-C LAND USE PLANNING
Land use regulation by cities in the Metropolitan Area has been governed by the Municipal
Planning Act (MS 462) and the Metropolitan Land Planning Act (MS 473). While not a perfect
framework, these acts have worked well for the vast majority of cities in the metropolitan area.
Land use control is more than just one of the many powers exercised by ciries and occupies a
significant part of the work of city councils and their staff. It has a significant impact on other
community reguladons, tax base, economic development and redevelopmen� It is a driving
force for creating service needs. Land use regulation is the common thread which runs through
most of a city's functions and operations.
Proposed legislation, which would have superseded existing law and created a uniform land
planning law for cities, towns and counties was introduced in the 1987 through 1990 legislative
sessions under the sponsorship of the Governor's Advisory Committee on State-Local Relations
(ACSLR). The AMM successfully opposed those proposals because they would have diluted
the authority of local elected officials; established a new legal framework which could have
rendered moot much of the existing case law and existing codes and ordinances; created
conflict with some provisions of the metropolitan land planning act; and reduced the flexibility
and discretion of local officials to manage development within cities.
A special AMM task force worked for over two years in developing a compromise proposal
beneficial to metro cities as well as to the counties; townships and outstate cities. :'iie task
force's work was completed in late 1991 and a bill was introduced in tr.e i992 session which
embodied the task force's work. No comparable bill was introduced in the 1993 session.
THE AMM WILL SUPPORT A UNIFORM LAND PLANNING ACT THAT IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF T�-IE COMPROMISE PROPOSAL
DEVELOPED BY THE AMM LAND USE PLANNING TASK FORCE THAT WAS
EMBODIED IN THE 1992 DRAFT BILL. ,
31
�
METROPOLITAN AGENCIES
PAGE 32 THROUGH 48
�J
� IV
METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE AND
IV. METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE PHILOSOPHY.
� �
There are certain issues, concerns and problems which because of their
encompass the entire metropolitan area and can not be dealt with by a single local ;
through a combine of local units. The region needs to deal with these regional i;
regional governance structure which acts in cooperation with and as partners with
government and ofiicials.
IV-A PURPOSE OF METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTUR:
i .
� �
, The diversity in demographics and political subdivisions within our metropolitan �
the need for planning on a metropolitan basis which much be done in cooperation
government. There is also a need. for a regional service delivery system to provid
services or�portions of services to most effectively and efficiently address the neec
metropolitan area.
i �
THE AMM AFFIItMS ITS SUPPORT FOR THE EXISTENCE OF A METP
GOVERNANCE SY5TEM TO DEAL WITH APPROPRIATE REGIONAL
, Al�1D CONCERN5. THE PURPOSES OF THE METROPOLITAN GOVERP
SYSTEM SHOULD BE TO FACILITATE AND PROVIDE REGION-WIDE
AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA WITH THE
COOPERATION AND CONSIDERATION OF THE AFFECTED LOCAL
GOVERNMENTAL UNITS; TO PROVIDE CERTAIN REGION-WIDE SE
THAT DO NOT DUPLICATE THOSE THAT CAN BE PROVIDED BY LOi
GOVERNMENTAL UNITS, EITHER INDIVIDUALLY OR JOINTLY; AN]
FULFILL OTHER SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES MANDATED BY THE �
FE�UERAL GOVERNMENTS.
IV-B CRITERIA FOR EXTENSION OF METROPOLITAN
AUTHORITY.
or breadth
rnmeni or
through a
tl units of
;a result in
�ith local
certain
of the
LITAN
VICES
TO
CATE AND
Execudve, legislative or self directed iniatives to expand power or authority of the Metropolita
Governance System must be carefully considered and limited in focus with in-deptli review by
all those impacted by the proposed expansion.. �
THE LEGISLATURE, WHEN GRANTING THE METROPOLITAN GOVE
STRUCTURE ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY, SHOULD CAREFULLY STA
SPECIFIC AUTHORITY BEING GRANTED.
32
THE
ANY EXPANSION OR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED
ONLY WHEN ONE QR MORE QF TI3E FClLLt?WING CONDITIONS EXIST:
-THE SERVICE, F'UNCTIQN, QR ACTi'YITY IiAS BEEN SHOWN TO BE
NEEDED AND IT CAN BE DEMCINSTRATED THAT IT CANNOT UR IS NOT BEING
EFFECTIVELY QR EFFICIENTLY PRQVIDED THROUG�-I EXISTING GENERAL
PURPOSE UNTTS OF GOVERNMENT;
-THE SERVICE, FUNCTION, OR ACTIVITY IS NOT AN APPROPRIATE STATE
LEVEL 4R LUCAL GOYERNMENT LEYEL ACTiVITY QR FLJNCTION.
-INTER�VEEl�i'I`ION ON A REGIdNAL BASIS IS TZEEDED FQR PR{}TECTI4N OF TI�iE
REGION'5 INVESTMENT IN AN EXISTING METR(JPOLITAN SYSTEM.
IV-C STRUCTURES, PLANNYNG, IMPLEMENTATION AND FUNDING dJF
h�ETRC}P4LTTAN SERVICES AND PROGRAMS.
The Metrapolitan Cauncil was created by the I.�gislature in 1967 ta coardinate "the planning
and development" af the Metrapolitan Area. The Council was mastly advisary, but was given
respansibility for regianal policy development and coordinatian in the areas of wastewater
treatment and disposal, land transportation and airports. The Council was given limited
appraval autha�ity for development progosais which were of inetropolitan {regional}
significance. The Cauncil was not given direct operatianal authority and instead the Legislature
created twa new Metrapolitan Corr�missions {�vIWCC and MTC} and restructured the MAC to
operate and pravide regional services. The Metrapolitan Council's responsibility has expanded
subsequenfly to include regional parks and open space, salid waste, approval autho�ty far
controlled access highways and for certain Elements (airports, transp�rt..�ti�n, parks and open
space, and sewers} af local comprehensive plans. The 1994 I.�gislature removed the salid
waste responsibility but gave the Council direct aperational responsibility for transit and
wasterwater treatment and eliminated the MTC, MWCC and the RTB as independent agencies.
C-1 SELECTION OF METROPCILITAN CfJUNCIL MEMBERS
The 1994 Metrapolitan Reorganizatian Act pravides far a 1'7 person Metropolitan Council,
appainted by and serving at the pleasure of the Governor. This arrangement raises at least
three significant concerns for the AMM:
1. Is it accountable ta and understandable by the citizens of the metropalitan area who it
serves and who pay for its operatians?
2. Daes it contribnte to the sense of regional citizenship and involvement necessary to
effectively address many of the emerging issues of inetropolitan governance?
3. Will it achieve a cansistency of policy direction and implementation over time?
33
THE AMM REMAINS CONVINCED THAT AN ELECTED METROPOLI'I'AN
COUNCIL IS THE BE5T WAY TO ACHIEVE ACCOUNTABILITY, CITIZEN
INVOLVEMENT, AND LONG TERM 5TABILTTY FOR REGIONAL GOVERNMEN
THE PROCEDURES FOYt ELECTION SHOULD FOLLOW THE GUIDEL � S PUT
FORTH IN THE AMM REPORT ON METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE.�
C-2 RESTRUCTURING OF METROPOLITAN AGENCIES.
In 1994 the Legislature eliminated the Regional Transit Board (RTB), the Metropo
Commission (MTC) and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) as
agencies. There are still separate agencies for sports,facilities and airports.
THE AMM RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING STATUTORY CHANGES
RESPECT TO METROPOLITAN AGENCIE5:
-REMOVE TgiE METROPOLITAN SPORTS FACILITIE5 COMMISSION AS A
METROPOLITAN AGENCY SINCE THE BACK-UP TAX LIABILITY I5 L1MI7
ONE CITY WHICH ALSO APPOINTS ALL COMMISSIONER5 EXCEPT T�E
CHAIR, CONTINGENT UPON TTS DIVERTITURE OF LAND5 AND PROPER'I
CITIES NOT RE5PONSIBLE FOR THE BACK-UP TAX: I
Transit
TO
IN
CLARIFY THE STATUS OF THE METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION
(MAC) SO THAT IT EITHER BECOMES A TRUE METROPOLITAN AGENCY OR A
STATE DIIZECTED AGENCY. IF THE BACK UP PROPERTY TAX IS LIMITED TO
THE SEVEN COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA THEN ITS MEMBERSHIP, SHOULD
COME FROM THE METROPOLITAN AREA. IF THE BACK UP PROPERTY TAX IS
STATE WIDE THEN THE MAC SHOULD HAVE STATEWIDE REPRE5ENTATION.
C-3 POLICY PLANNING - P,OLICY IMPLEMENTATION.
The historic legislative division of responsibiliry between planning and operating at
metropolitan level has been mostly eliminated. '
A5 THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL IMPLEMENTS ITS ADDITIONAL DII2ECT
OPERATING RESPONSIBILITY, THE COUNCIL MUST NOT ALLOW ITS
HISTORIC REGIONAL PLANNING ROLE TO BE DIMINISHED BECAU5E OF IT5
NEW OPERATING FUNCTIONS. TO ASSURE THAT THE COUNCIL DOES NOT
LOOSE SIGHT OF ITS VISIONARY ROLE, LONG-RANGE PLANNING
RESPONSIBILITIES AND ABILITY TO DEAL WITH EMERGING ISSUE5 A
TIMELY MANNER; THE COUNCIL SHOULD CONSIDER ESTABLISHING A
PLANNING COMMITTEE WITH STATUS EQUAL TO ITS OTHER STANDING
COMMITTEE5 WHICH DEAL MORE WITH OPERATION5 AND DAY-TO-DAY
CONCERNS.
�
�
�
34
r•
C-4 FUNDING FOR REGIONALLY PROVIDED SERVICES.
The funding sources for the Metropolitan Council and the various regionally provided services
has changed over time and is currently a mixture of property taxes, user fees and federal and
state revenues. There have t�een d.iscussions to replace these multiple sources with a single
new revenue source.
THE AMM BELIEVE5 TT IS APPROPRIATE TO CONTINUE TO FUND THE
REGIONAL SERVICES AND ACTIVITIES BY THE EXISTING COMBINATION OF
USER FEES, PROPERTY TAXES, STATE AND FEDERAL GRANTS. THE AMM
BELIEVE5 THIS METHOD PROVIDES BETTER OVERSIGHT OF EXPENDITURES
BY THE 'PAYERS' AND THEREFORE OPPOSES THE IMPOSITION OF A SINGLE
NEW SOURCE TO REPLACE THE PRE5ENT FUNDING SOURCES. THE AMM
ALSO BELIEVES THAT THE LINKAGE BETWEEN REVENUES AND
EXPENDITURES FOR EACH 5ERVICE SHOULD REMAIN VISIBLE BY
FUNCTION A5 THE OPERATING FUNCTIONS ARE ABSORBED BY THE NEW
GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE.
C-5 REGIONAL TAX RATES AND USER FEES
The Legislature controls the tax rate limits of the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan
Airports Commission (MAC). We believe it should continue to do so. User fees are generally
controlled by the Metropolitan entity collecting the fees (MAC, MSFC, Met Council) . The
setting of user fees and the process for setting or changing fees has generally not been
considered a problem by local officials except for isolated cases.
THE AMM BELIEVES THAT: USER FEES FOR REGIONAL SERVICES SHOULD
NOT BE DICTATED BY THE LEGISLATURE BUT SHOULD BE DETERMINED BY
THE AGENCY PROVIDING THE SERVICE. ALL FEES SHOULD BE REVIEWED
BY THE METROPOLITAN COUNCII. ON A PERIODIC BASIS TO ENSURE THAT
SUCH FEES ARE CONSISTENT WITH REGIONAL SYSTEM PLANS AND GOALS.
AN OPEN VISIBLE PROCE5S/PROCEDURE SHOULD BE EMPLOYED FOR USER
FEE CHANGES WHEN CHANGES ARE PROPOSED AND IN CLOSE
COOPERATION WITH THOSE IMPACTED BY THE FEE CHANGE5. A CLEAR
LINKAGE BETWEEN FEES AND SERVICE SHOULD BE MAINTAINED.
IV-D COMPREHEN5IVE PLANNING - LOCAL AND REGIONAL INTERACTION
Planning is an ongoing process, and several precepts should be kept in mind by Local Units of
Government, Metropolitan Council and the State as this metropolitan planning process
condnues. �
METROPOLITAN SYSTEM PLAN5 MUST CONTINUE TO BE SUFFICIENTLY
35
SPECIFIC IN TERMS 4F LOCATI4NS, CAPACITIES, AND TIMING TO
FOR CONSIDERATION IN LpCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN1vING.
THE REGIONAL INVESTMENT IN METROPOLITAN PHYSICAL SERV
SYSTEMS, TRANSPCIRTATION, WASTEWATER TREATI��ENT, AIRPU�
PARK AND OPEN SPACE, SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE PROTECTED l
PREVENTING ADVERSE IMPACT 4N THESE SYSTEMS DUE Tf3 LACI
INTEGRATION AND CO(JRDINATION BETWEEN REGIONAL AND LO
PLANI�+IING.
LOCAL OFFICIALS MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE INPUT INTtJ THE
FLANI�IING PROCESS ON AN ONGOING BASIS.
�
�
DESIGNATION OF OTHER REGIQNAL PLANS A5 METROPOLITAN SYSTEMS
PLANS SI-�t�ULD N�T BE MADE LiNLESS THERE iS A�OMPELLING �
METROPULTTAN AREA WIDE PROBLEM OR CONCERN THAT CAN BE5T BE
ADDRESSED THROUGH A REGIONAL SYSTElVI DESIGNATION. I
IV-E METROP+DLITAN COUNCIL BUDGETJW4RK PROGRAM PR
The Metropalitan Council as restructured, will have an annual operatang budget o�
million dollars and its programs and services impact the two million plus people li
metropalitan area. The budget document should convey sufficient information so t
constatuents can deternune what services are being pravided and how much the se:.
who benefits and who pays. The budget process should commence early enough i
adoption cycle and be open so that its constituents;: can provide meaningful input
and priarities.
E-1 BUDGET DE`�AIL AND PROCESS.
300
ng in the
t its
.ces cost,
the annual
� to gaals
The annual budget and work program dacument has been improved in recent years �and
contains more detail and specificity which enables public interest groups to make rrmore
reasoned recommendatians but furt�ier improvements can be made. It will be a challenge far
the Cauncil�to continue this irngravement as the direct council budget expands fro� 15
million to over 3pQ mil.lion. '
MANDATED Olt NON-DISCRETIONARY PROJECTS, PROGRAMS AND
ACTTYITIES SHQIILD BE IDENTIFIED. PRCIJECTS, PROGRAMS AND
ACTIVITIES WHICH MAY BE DISCRETIONARY BUT ARE TOTALLY 1
MOSTLY F'UN�1ED BY A FEDERAL OR STATE GRANT SII{�ULD ALS(}
IDENTIFIED. INFORMATION SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE PROVIDED
PREVI4US YEARS EXPENDITURES AND PROGRESS FOR ON-G(?ING
PROGRAMS, PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES.
�
t
�
Q1:
AS THE COUNCIL MOVES TO A UNIFIED BUDGET AND BUDGET PROCESS
INCORPORATING THE SERVICES FORMERLY PROVIDED BY THE MWCC, MTC
AND RTB, THE AMM BELIEVES T�IE EXPENSE5 AND REVENUE5 FOR THOSE
SERVICES SHOULD BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND THE LINKAGES
MAINTAINED IN THE iJ1vIFIED BUDGET. FURTHER, THE A1VIIVI DOES NOT
BELIEVE FUNDS OR RESERVE FUNDS RAISED FOR A PARTICULAR SERVICE
SHOULD BE USED OR CO-MINGLED WITH THE FUNDS RAISED FOR ANY
OTHER SERVICE OR ACTIVITY.
E-2 PROGRAM EVALUATION
The Council historically levies the mai�imuin or close to tlie inaxiinum tax levy allowed. It is
difficult for its constituents to determine if internal evaluation is being performed to ascertain �
the effecdveness or necessity of council programs arid services or if they are being continued
because 'they have always been done.' �
THE AM1VI BELIEVE5 THAT EVERY MAJOR COUNCIL PROGRAM/PRIORITY
SHOULD MEET FOUR TESTS:
-THE ISSUE OR PROBLEM BEING ADDRE55ED IS IIVIPORTANT TO THE WELL
BEING OF THE REGION. �
-COUNCIL INTERVENTION OR ACTIVITY WILL PRODUCE A POSITIVE RESULT.
-COUNCIL EFFORT OR ACTIVITY DOES NOT DUPLICATE OR SERVE AS A
SUBSTITUTE FOR A STATE LEVEL PROGRAM OR EFFORT OR WHAT �;i�ULD
BE A STATE LEVEL ACTIVITY.
-COUNCIL IS MOST APPROPRIATE AGENCY TO INTERVENE OR PERFORM
ACTIVITY. '
E-3 RELIANCE ON PROPERTY TAXES
r
There is a trend of increased reliance on the property tax to support traiiitional,Council
acdvities. Federal grants and state funds formerly funded about two/thirds of the Council
Budget and the lacal properry tax about one/third. The property tax portion has increased to
over 60 percent. ('This does not include the new operating responsibilities).
THE COUNCIL SHOULD CONTINUE TO EXAMINE THE SERVICES THAT ARE
FUNDED BY LOCAL DOLLARS THAT WERE FORMERLY FUNDED BY NON-
LOCAL FUNDS TO DETERMINE IF THEY ARE STILL NECESSARY AND
WORTHWHILE. THE COUNCIL SHOULD CONTINUE TO DIVEST ITSELF OF
SERVICES OR SEEK STATE FUNDING FOR THE 5ERVICES THAT IT PROVIDES
FOR THE METROPOLITAN AREA THAT STATE AGENCIES PROVIDE FOR THE
37
BALANCE OF THE STATE.
IV-F METROPOLITAN PARK AND OPEN SPACE FUNDING
The Legislature established the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space System in 1
provided state/regional fiscal support for the acquisition and development of the
provided a payment in lieu of taxes to local units of government for land remov
rolls. Since the establishment of the system, the State and the Metropolitan area
establish a permanent partnership relative to thefmancing of the Regional Park S
to clearly deime the role of regional parks has led to long term instability relati
acquisition and development of regional parks and created significant funding cc
implementing agencies.
F-1 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDING
4 and
�stem and
from the tax
ve failed to
tem . Failure
to the
:erns for
Regional parks within the Metropolitan area provide the same basic function as state parks
provide in Greater Minnesota. The State does not fully acknowledge this situation and has
never provided an adequate amount of funding for the operation and maintenance of regional
parks while covering 100 percent of the cost of state parks in Greater Minnesota. I�
AMM RECOMMENDS THAT THE STATE OF MINNESOTA RECOGI�IIZ]
ROLE OF REGIONAL PARKS WITHIN THE METROPOLITAN AREA A:
PROVIDE APPROPRIATE FUNDING TO IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES 7
THEM IN THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE REGIONAL
AND OPEN SPACE SYSTEM. THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SHOULD PF
PERCENT OF THE FUNDING TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE5E F,
I1�ISTEAD OF THE APPROXIMATE 10 PERCENT IN THE LAST FEW �
�
F-2 REG�ONAL BONDING FOR REGIONAL PARKS
The Legislature for the past several years has provided less than 25 percent of the
requested for acquisition and development by the Metropolitan Council and the M
annual basis. To allow for the orderly and planned development schedule for the r
and open space system, the Metropolitan Council is currently using previously gr�
authority and is issuing regional bonds to make up part of the shortage. Bonds w]
backed by a regional property tax.
THE AMM BELIEVES THAT THE REGIONAL PARKS ARE ESSENTIAL
SUBSTITUTE FOR STATE PARKS IN THE METRO AREA AND SHOUL]
FUNDED ACCORDINGLY. THEREFORE, THE AMM BELIEVES I5SUIl�
REGIONAL BOND5 INAPPROPRIATELY SHIFTS THE BURDEN OF RE�
PARK FUNDING FROM THE STATE TO METROPOLITAN AREA PRO�
,
TAXPAYERS. IN E5SENCE, METRO AREA TAX PAYERS WILL BE PA
TWICE FOR STATE PARK SERVICE AND THIS IS UNFAIR. THE
;
:
THE
� ASSIST
ARKS
iVIDE 40
on an
� pazks
are
YA
BE
METROPOLTTAN COUNCIL SHOUL'D�REDOUBLE ITS EFFORT5 TO OBTAIN�AN
EQUITABLE SHARE OF STATE FUNDING IN FUTURE LEGISLATIVE FUNDING
CYCLES.
IV-G WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
The AMM recognizes that water is a critical resource for this metropolitan azea and it is
necessary to plan and manage this resource to assure adequate supply, safeguarii the public
health, provide recreational opportunities arid enhance economic opportunities. Many levels of
government have a vested interest in protecting and managing water resources in an
environmentally and economically sound manner. Since many levels of government are
involved in water management, it is in 'the public interest to clearly delineate each" �level's
responsibility to prevent duplication, oveilap, and conflicting requirements. �This delineation is
particularly important to cities since they are the level that ultimately has� the most "hands on"
responsibility.
,The aspects of water resources which have received the �most �attention in recent years are
surface water runoff, groundwater quality, water supply and water recharge areas (wetlands).
There is an interrelationship among all of these systems and there is need�for coordination in
managing them effectively. The AMM believes that local units of government should retain the
basic responsibiliry for water resources management because they ,are the level closest to the
problems. However," local government units need� the financial resources,� tools and technical
expertise to implement this responsibility and may need to look to the state and the
Metropolitan Council j for this assistance. �
G-1,WATER 5UPPLY
The A1VIM is in general.agreement with the' Water Supply Act (Chapter 186) passed in the
1993 legislative session. The thrust of this , legislation;.is to promote water� conservation, require
contingency. plans for water emergencies and to promote. long. range planning for local water
supplies. As suggested by the AMM, cities retained the basic responsibility and authority for
local water supply systems. �The Metropolitan Council is encouraged to complete its regional
water supply data base as soon as possible to provide a framework for local water supply
planning.
THE AMM DOES NOT SEE THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL L`EGIS�,ATION
� PERTAINING TO LOCAL'� WATER� SUPPLY � PLANNING AT THIS POINT IN TIME.
HOWEVER, IF-LEGISLATION-IS PROPOSED,�IT SHOULD BE BASED ON THE
: FOLLOWING PRINCII'LES:
-LOCAL UNI'TS 5HOULD R,ETAIN {THE'BASICsRESPONSIBILITY FOR WATER
SUPPLY�PLANNING AS IN CURRENT�LAW.
�
-ADDITIONAL STATE M'ANDATES SHOULD BE FUNDED BY -THE STATE.
39
•NEW STATE IMPCI5ED REQUIREMENTS AND t3R ItEGULATIfJNS
IMPLEMENTING CHAPTER 186 SHOULD NOT ADD TO LOCAL Ci
POSSIBLE S�IGIULD REDUCE AND/OR MINIMIZE DUPLICATIVE R
G-2 SURFACE AND GRGIUND'�VATER WATER M[ANAGEMENT
. ,
The AlViNi supparts as a given that no ane has the right to pallute either ground o
water resources and in arder to safeguard the public health and environment, it is :
preserve our water resources as critical state resources. Most Water Mana�ement {
(WMC7) and local units or gavernment have done a good job of dealing with surfa
groundwater management issues and have the authority and ability to con�inue to �
cost effective manner. These existing mechanisms should continue to be used to tY
extent possible to address surface and groundwater management problems; instead
new system ar a new arganization, but they need the financial resources and tools
responsibility.
While the AMM does not see the need for any new urban water management c
clear that the current system contains duplicative review and apgrovals af local
development projectslp�'oposals and should be strearnlined. The AMM believes
far review and approvai of surface water management planning and the review
process for "perrnitting projects" is rife with duplicative reviews and time cons�
�F LEGISLATIQN IS CONSIDERED FOR SURFACE WATEi2
S]HOULD BE Bt�SED ON THE F'OI.,LQWING FRINCIPLES:
-THE LEGISLATURE SfI4ULD PROVIDE FUNDS IF TT MANDATES AN
ADDTTIOI�TAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLANNII'�G OR INIP'LEMENTIN(
ACTTVITIES BY LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERl�fMENT. T�I� CSQ PRQGRA
BE VIEWED AS THE PRECEDENT FOR THE STATE HAVING A FINANI
INTERE5T IN PROVIDING FUN�S FOR CAPITAL PR4)JECTS RELATE�
STORM WATER RUNOFF.
�
-L,OCAL UNI'I'5 OF GOVERNMENT SHOULD RETAIN THE BASIC
RE5PQNSIBILITY FQR SURFACE AND �RC}UNDWATER MANAGEMEIti
THEY ARE THE LEVEL CLOSEST TO 'THE PROBLEM.
I
-NEW STATE REQUIREMENTS SHOULD NOT ADD TO L(JCAL COSTS
DUPLICATIVE IZEVIEWSIAPPROVALS SI�OULD BE ELIMIlVATED.
�
TI-�E AMM WOIILLI SIJPPORT TI�E Ff)LLUWING INITIATTVESIACTIO�
�
-TI11�EI�Y f COMPLET�ON OF METROP(�LITAN COUNCIL RESPONSIB
DEFINED � IN MS 473.15'7 SO THA�' r►7VM0'S AND CITIES CAN FULF
SURFACE �VATER MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES.
AND IF
surface
to
and
so in a
greatest
' creating a
meet this
ization, it is
s and
the systems
approval
g delays.
', IT
SHOULD
�
AS
[ES AS
THEIR
-A THOROUGH ASSESSMENT OF THE BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES
(BWSR) STRUCTURE AND AUTHORITIES TO ASCERTAIN IF IT SHOULD C(�NTINUE
TO BE THE APPROVAL AND OVERSIGHT AGENCY FOR SURF�iCE WAT�R
MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND ACTIVITIES IN THE METROPOLTTAN A1tEA.
-A THOROUGH ASSESSMENT OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA SUR�'ACE WATE12
MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND PERMITTING PROCESS WITH THE OBJECTIVE
OF DEVELOPING IMPROVEMENTS IN CONFLICT RESOLUTION,
COORDINATION BETWEEN AND AMONG STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES,
SURFACE WATER PLANNING, AND PROJEC�' PERMIT APPROVALS.
-COMPLETION BY WMOS AND CITIES OF THEIR RESPONSiBILITIES FOR
5URFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLANNING AS DEFINED IN MS 103 B. 225-235
A5 SOON A5 POSSIBLE TO ADDRESS THE WATER QUALITY ISSLTES PLAGUING
THE MINNESOTA, MIS5ISSIPPI ANI) ST. CROIX RIVERS. -
-COMPLIANCE BY LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT IN OUTSZ'ATE IYIINNESOTA
WITH THE SAME STANDARDS AND REQUIl2EMENTS FOR SURFACE �VATER
MANAGEMENT AS THOSE IMPOSED ON LOCAL UNTTS WITHIN THE
METROPOLITAN AREA.
G-3 REGIONAL WASTEWATER (SEWER) TREATMENT SYSTEM
The metropolitan wastewater treatment and collection systems, which was created in 1969, has
contributed signiiicantly to the improvement of water quality in many of the major water
resources of this area. As a result of a major study and analysis in the mid 1980's a unif�rm
funding system was established. A major legislative proposal was put forth in_ ;:�e 1992 session
based on the premise that the developed portion of this region was subsidizing the developing
area. This assertion was not substantiated by a study conducted under contract by the
University of Minnesota in late 1992 and early 1993 as a result of the legislative proposal.
THE METROPOLITAN WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND TREATMENT SYSTEM
HAS BEEN A MAJOR COMPONENT OF A1�T INTERGRATED LOCAL-REGIONAL
SYSTEM WHICH HAS HELPED IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF THE WATER IN
MANY OF THE MAJOR WATER RESOURCES OF THIS AREA SUCIi AS LAKE
MINNETONKA, THE MINNESOTA, MISSISSIPPI AND ST. CROIX RIVERS, WHITE
BEAR LAKE, ETC. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT CHANGE NOT BE MAI)E TO THIS
REGIONAL SYSTEM THAT COULD LEAD TO ITS BREAKUP OR TO DIMINISH
ITS EFFECTIVENESS. SINCE ALL 'USERS' BENEFIT EQliALLY THROUGHOUT
THE SYSTEM THE REGIONAL RATES SHOULD BE UNIFORM THROUGHOUT
THE SYSTEIVI AND A SUB-REGIONAL SYSTEM OF ALLOCATING THE
REGIONAL SY5�'EM COSTS SHOULD NOT BE REINSTITUTED.
H-4 WATER TESTING CONNECTION FEE
41
testing as mandated by Federal Law. This per user fee creates an inequitable and
fee compared to testing cost for large communities with only a few supply points
testing. In addition, there are many non-community and private water supply use�
trailer courts being tested which are not paying the connection fee imposed by th
of Health: This fee should be re-examined by the legislature and the law changed
community and user pays only its fair share. This may necessitate the state to prc
iinancial assistance to smaller communities with multiple supply sources.
THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO CHANGE THE 'VVATEI
TESTING CONNECTION FEE TO BE FAIR AND EQUITABLE AND TO
THE ACTUAL COST OF SUPPLY TESTING WITHIN THE COMMUNTI
NON COMMUNTTY AND PRIVATE SYSTENd5 5HOULD PAY ALL OR l
THEII2 TESTING COST.
i
IV-I WASTE STREAM MANAGEMENT
The problem of managing the waste stream (for all types of waste) is and will
one of the major social environmental problems during this decade. We are ra�
of space (capacity for land disposal) in the metropolitan area and there are no ;
facilities in this state for Hazardous Waste. We are also learning that for many
incineration may not be a good environmental alternative to landfill disposal.
The exisring waste management system centralizes responsibility at the state leve
hazardous waste but requires the cooperation and support of all levels of governr
private sector. The solid waste system is essentially a three-tiered system: cities c
regulate collection; counties are responsible for 'siting' new landfills, developing
plans, developing processing facilities and regulating e�sting landf'�lls; and the s1
grants and has regional planning and coordinating responsibilities. The systems v�
to foster and encourage abatement, recycling and resource recovery for as much �
stream as' possible and then to assure environmentally sound disposal for the rem
i
Much has been accomplished during the past decade in improving the waste stre�
management system. Much remains to be done and any future legislation should
account the following precepts.
I-1 INTEGRATED WASTE STREAM PLANNING
The disposal of solid waste is a multifaceted problem which will require the coo�
participation of all levels of government and the private sector to effectively deve
manage a solid waste system which is cost effective and environmentally sound. '
such a system, all elements of the waste management hierarchy (reduction, reuse,
compositing, incineration, landf'�lling) must be utilized. Further, it must be realiz�
effective "system" begins before materials become "waste" and, as such, a comp�
view of the entire life cycle of products is needed in order to succeed.
42
mra�r service
that need
� such as
Department
so that each
ride some
SUPPLY
. ALSO,
►RT OF
nue to be
running out
�al disposal
for
�nt and the
�ntrol and
��batement
te provides
;re intended
' the waste
ining waste.-
n
tke into
;ration and
�p and
o achieve
that an
-THE AMM ENDORSES THE CONCEPT THAT THE "GEIiTERATORS" OF WASTE ,
MUST BEAR THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR FUNDING ITS DISPOSAL. '
"GENERATOR" INCLUDES THE MANUFACTURERS OF PRODUCTS W�IICH
BECOME WASTE, THE 5ELLERS OF PRODUCTS �V�IICH BECOME WASTE AND ,
THE CONSUMER OF PRODUCTS WHICH BECOME �VASTE.
-THE AMM ENDORSES THE CONCEPT THAT SINCE GOVERNMENT IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL, IT HAS A L�GITIMATE INTE1tEST
IN BEING INVOLVED IN OVERALL WASTE STREAM MANAGEMENT. THIS
MEANS THAT GOVERNMENT'S INTEREST BEGINS BEFORE MATERIALS
BECOME "WASTE."
-THE AMM ENDORSES A WAS'TE MANAGEMENT HIERAptCHY WHICH
INCLUDES REDUCTION, REU5E, RECYCLING, COMPOSITING, INCINERATION
AND LANDFILLING. FURTHER, A COMPREI3ENSIVE SYSTEM MUST INCLUDE A
MIXTURE OF ALL THESE ELEMENTS AND SHOULD NOT RELY SO�,EL�' ON
ANY ONE ELEMENT.
-THE AMM ENCOURAGES MORE ATTENTION BE GIVEN TO THE
ALTERNATIVES OF REDUCTION, REUSE AND RECYCLING BY EiI,Y., LEVELS OF
GOVERNMENT.
-THE STATE SHOULD FUND THE DEVELOPMENT �iND IMPLEMENTATION OF
AN EDUCATION PROGRAM, WHICH ACTIVELY �NCOURAGES CITIZENS TO
RECYCLE, COMPOST, REUSE AND REDiJCE WA5TE GENERATION.
-LEGISLATION SHOULD BE INITIATED WHICH WOULD ESTARL��ai RECYCLED
CONTENT OR RECYCLABILITY GOALS FOR ALL I�RODUCT PACKAGING
MATERIALS, INCLUDING FOOD AND BEVERAGE CONTAINEI2S.
- LEGISLATION SHOULD BE INITIATED WHICH WOULD PROVIDE FINANCIAL
INCENTIVES TO MANUFACTURERS, RETAILERS OR CONSUME1tS F012 '
REDUCING PACKAGING VOLUME, USING RECYCLED MATERIALS IN ITS
FABRICATION, OR, PARTICULARLY IN THE CASE OF FOOD AND BEVERAGE
CONTAINERS, FACILITATING ITS RETURN. FEES, TAXES, OR DEPO5IT5 ON
PACKAGING MATERIALS SHOULD B� CONSIDERED WITH THESE COSTS
WAIVED WHEN CONTENT GOALS ARE MET, VOLUMES ARE MINIMIZED, OR
EFFECTiVE MATERIALS R�TURN SYSTEMS ARE IN PLACE. THE NET REVENUE
GENERATED FROM FEES/TAXES ABOVE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS SHOULD BE
USED TO PROMOTE 0i2 ENHANCE LOCAL PROGRAMS TO REDUCE, REUSE,
RECYCLE PACKAGING NdATERIALS.
-THE AMM STRONGLY SUPPORTS THE ACTIVITIES OF THE NEW OFFICE OF
ENVIIZONMENTAL ASSISTANCE (REPLACED THE FORMER OFFICE OF WASTE
43
MANAGEMENT), IN PARTICULAR ITS EFFORTS IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT
A5SISTANCE AND WASTE REDUCTION EDUCATION. THIS NEW OF�FICE
SHOULD NOT BECOME INVOLVED IN REGULATORY ACTIVITIES BUT SHOULD
� CONTINUE TO FOCUS ON HELPING LOCAL GOVERNMENTS MANAGE WASTE
EFFECTIVELY IN AN ENVIRONMENTALY 50UND MANNER. I
-THE AMM OPPO5ES ANY LEGISLATION WHICH WOULD LIMIT
INITIATIVES IN WASTE STREAM MANAGEMENT UNLESS AN O`
� OR METROPOLITAN WIDE 5YSTEM IS ESTABLISHED WHICH A(
+ THE SAME GOAL OR OBJECTIVE.
-THE AMM SUPPORTS COMPOSITING AS A TECHNIQUE FOR REU�
YARDWASTES AND OTHER APPROPRIATE COMPONENTS OF THE
WASTE STREAM. GIVEN THE PROHIBITION ON LANDFILLING YAl
RESIDENTS AND REFUSE HAULERS NEED TO BE PROVIDED WITH
CONVEI�TIENT LOCATIONS TO DEPOSIT BRUSH AND OTHER YARD
FOR PROCESSING. COUNTIES WITH ASSISTANCE FROM THE 5TA7
BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND OPERATING COMPOSITIN(
AND MUST NOT DELEGATE THIS RESPONSIBILITY TO CITIES WH
WISH TO OPERATE SUCH FACILITIE5. .
I-2 HAZARDOUS AND DANGEROUS WA5TE MANAGEMENT
The improper disposal of hazardous wastes, through landf'illing or incineration,
risk of water and air pollution. Much has been done to monitor the generation �
disposal ;of hazardous waste by business and industry, and these efforts should
However, the reduction, control and proper disposal of household hazardous w�
significant concern which needs to be addressed.
i
(A.) HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE. +
� .
THE AMM 5UPPORTS A STATE-WIDE PROGRAM TARGETED TO T
REDUCTION AND PROPER MANAGEMENT OF HOUSEHOLD HAZA
WASTES, INCLUDING:
�
�
-PERMANENT DROP OFF OR DISPOSAL SITES - STRATEGICALLY
CONVEI�IIENTLY LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE STATE WHERE A]
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOU5 WASTES CAN BE TAKEN FOR PROPER
PROCESSING, OR DISPOSAL.
�I.L STATE
MPLISHES
OF
ASTE,
�ASTES
; SHOULD
FACILITIES
;H DO NOT
es a major
proper
is a
US
TYPES OF
�
-EDUCATIONAL AND POINT-OF-5ALE INFORMATION FOR CONSUMERS
NOTIFYING THE1�7 OF THE HAZARDOUS NATURE OF CERTAIN PRODUCT5
AND THE IMPORTANCE OF PROPEIt HANllLING. I
-INVOLVEMENT OF THE GENERATORS (1tETA.ILERS) IN THE MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM FOR Ii4USE�-IOLD HAZARD4US WASTES TQ HELF ASSURE PROPEit
HANDLING AND PROCESSING.
-INFORMATI4N TO CONSUMERS ALERTING THEM �O NON-HAZARDOUS
SUBSTFTUTES FQR HAZARI?QUS HCIUSEI-�QLD P1�Q�UCTS.
-ENC4URAGEMENT WHICH CQULD INCLUDE Il�ICENTIVE5 TO
MANUFACTURES TO PRODUCE LESS �IAZARDOUS PROD�JCTS FOR USE IN
HQUSE�I(}LDS. THE TOP PRIORITY t}F T�iE �IOUSE�iC}LD �IAZARD4US WASTE
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IS TO REDUCE THE AMCIUNT PRODUCED.
(B.) COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIA.L HAZARDOUS WAS'�E.
THE AMM SUPPURTS CONTINUED EFFCDRTS AT THE STATE LEVEL TO
PROPERLY MANAGE INDIJSTRIAL I3AZARDGIUS WASTES, INCL�ING THE
RE-USE, RECOVERY AND RECYCLING OF AS MUCH HAZARDOUS WASTE AS
POSSIBLE. T�IAT WI�ICH CANNOT BE RE-USED OR REPRCIC�SSED MUST �E
DISPOSED OF.IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER. FAII.URE TO
PROPERLY DISP{�SE OF I3AZARDOUS MATERIALS KNOWINGLY {INCLUDING
"ILLEGAL DUMPING") SHCIULD RESULT IN CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR BOTH
CCiMPANIES ANL1 IN�J►IVIDUALS. MANUFACTURERS SIIC)ULD ALSO BE
ENCOURAGED TCM REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF HAZARDOUS MATE�2IALS USED►
IN T�IEIR MAi�1I1FACTURING PROCESSES.
I-3 L(}CAL SOLII3 WASTE MANAGEMENT RESP4NSIBILI'�'IES
Cities have certain respansibilities in helping to manage and implement an effective solid waste
management system including recycling programs and the collection systems. The AMM
believes that ta date cities, utilizing a variety of collection systems, are daing a gaod jab of
managing Local Recycling and Waste Collection.
THE RESPOI�ISIBILITIES NOW ASSIGNED TO CITIES FOR S(JLDJ WASTE
MANAGEMENT SHOULD REMAIN WiTH THE CITT.ES. TI�E AMM BELIEVES
THAT THE SYSTEM OUGHT TO BE FLEXIBLE ANID BASED ON PERFORMANCE
STANDARDS AND/OR GOALS RATHER THAN MANDATED TECHNIQt7ES.
I-4 FUNDING
The current funding system for solid waste has a number of drawbacks: It daes nat encaurage
maximum utilizatian of the waste disgosal hierarchy, it often gives little incentive to
individual residents ta participate in recycling; it does not differentiate between generatars of
'clean' waste and 'Problem' waste; and it has given no assurances that the main saurces of
funding are related ta the entities incurring expenses.
4S
-AMM BELIEVE5 THAT THE FUNDING SYSTEM SHOULD RECOGN:
ALL METHODS OF DISPOSAL, INCLUDING RECYCLING HAVE A C
THE TRUE AND FULL CO5T OF THE ENTIRE DISPOSAL 5YSTEM S
RECOGNIZED.
-AMM BELIEVE5 THAT IN GENERAL FUNDING FOR THE SOLID W.
5YSTEM SHOULD COME FROM THE GENERATORS OF SOLID WAS
-AMM BELIEVES A FEE 5YSTEM AT THE MANUFACTURES AND/OR
LEVEL SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED AND THE CONCEPT O� RETUR:
5HOULD BE INVESTIGATED AND EXPANDED.
�
-IN GENERAL, THE FUNDING SYSTEM SHOULD E1�ICOURAGE MAXI
OF THE WASTE HIERAgtCHY. FUR EXAMPLE IT SHOULD COST MO
DISPOSE OF. WASTE IN LANDFILLS THAN IN RESOURCE RECOVER
FACILITIES.
1
,
-AMN SUPPORTS THE CONCEPT THAT MATERIALS WHICH CAUSE
PROBLEMS IN TI�E WASTE STREAM SHOULD BEAR THE COSTS (T]
THE COST OF PURCHASING THE MATERIAL5) ASSOCIATED WITH
PROBLEMS.
� .
-AMM BELIEVES THAT ANY FUNDING SYSTEM MUST GUARANTEE
DISTRIBUTION OF THE MONIES TO ALL ENTITIES INVOLVED IN T]
AND RECOG1vIZE ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SYSTEM. TH
SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE FUNDS RAISED THROUGH THE 5Al
SgIOULD BE DISTRIBUTED TO CTTIES WHICH OPERATE RECYCLIN
PROGRAMS. THE AMM ALSO BELIEVES THAT THE ENTIl2E PROC�
TAX ON SOI.ID WASTE SHOULD BE DEDICATED TO SOLID WASTE .
I-5 OItGA1VIZED COLLECTION
I
Organized collection serves as a viable and important method for municipalities
solid waste abatement. It is a type of service agreement that allows cities proper
power over their solid waste collection system. It provides municipalities the op�
choose the type of solid waste collection that would best serve their residents.
-THE AMM ENDORSES THE CONCEPT OF ORGA1vIZED COLLECTIO
OF SEVERAL VIABLE METHODS FOR MUNICIPALITIES TO ASSERT
REGULATORY POWER OVER THEIR SOLID WASTE COLLECTION S'
AND BELIEVES THAT ORGANIZED COLLECTION MUST CONTINUE '
AVAILABLE TO CITIES AS THEY CHOOSE A OF 50LID WASTE
COL�,ECTIO SYSTEM OPTION.
THAT
'. ALSO
:JLD BE
TAIL
M USE
TO
tOUGH
HESE
E SYSTEM
i MEANS A
:S TAX
:D5 OF
CTIVITIES.
achieve
gulatory
tunity to
f AS ONE
STEMS
0 BE
-THE AMM OPPOSES ANY LEGISLATION THAT WOULD IMPOSE
COMPENSATION PENALTIE5 ON MUNICIPALITIES WHO CHOOSE TO
IMPLEMENT A SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SYSTEM.
I-6 HOST CITIES AND CLEANUP RESPONSIBILITIES
While solid waste facilities are components of the solid waste management system, they must
be located in individual cities. Because the number of facilities is limited, the effects of hosting
these facilities is not equally shared among cities. Most of these effects are negative - an
increased likelihood and incidence of water, soil, air, and noise pollutiori; and increased amount
of litter and offensive odors; a greater likelihood of adverse impacts on values of neighboring
properties; a need for increased maintenance on public streets and highways; anc� potential
threats to public health and welfare in areas immediate to and along access routes to these
facilities. Longer-term impacts may affect cities if the organizations responsible for facility
operations cease as financially viable entities. Safeguards need to be enacted for host cities for
the operations and clean up responsibilities associated with solid waste facilities.
The trend within the metropolitan area has been to internalize present and future costs of solid
waste management on current generators of solid waste. These costs should include the extra
and adverse financial impacts borne by host communities. Cities host these regional facilities
because of accidents of geography. Liabilities for these facilities should be shared across the
region.
-THE AMM SUPPORTS THE CURRENT COMPENSATION LEVEL ALLOWED
THROUGH SURCHARGE FEES A5 A MINIMUM LEVEL; THIS COMPENSATION
SHOULD BE CONTINUED OR -INCREASED. THIS FORM OF COMPENSATT��1
SHOULD BE AVAILABLE TO ALL TYPES OF SOLID WASTE FA�i.,i`y'IES.
-THE AMM BELIEVES THE HOST COMMUNTTIES SHOULD NOT BEAR A
FINANCIAL LIABILITY ASSOCIATED WITH SOLID WASTE FACILITIE5. COSTS
INCURRED FOR MONITORING OPERATIONS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS.
SHOULD BE BORNE BY FACILITY OPERATORS OR, IN THE ABSENCE OF SUCH
REGULATIONS, BE ASSUMED BY THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. LEGISLATION
NEEDS TO BE STRENGTHENED SO A5 TO EXEIWIPT CITIES FROM ANY
PRE5ENT AND FUTURE LIABILITY ARISING FROM OPERATIONS O�' SOLID
WASTE FACILITIES. LEGISLATION SHOULD FURTHER ESTABLISH THAT
PROCEEDS FOR REMEDIAL ENVIlZONMENTAL ACTION5 BE IN A TRUST FUND.
-THE AMM WILL SUPPORT LEGISLATION WHICH CLEARLY ARTICULATES
THAT REMEDIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES ARE THE RESPONSIBII.TTY
ONLY OF THE PERMITTED OPERATOR AND/OR .THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
-THE AMM WILL SUPPORT STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION THAT
CLARIFIES THAT MUNICII'AL SOLID WASTE IS NOT A HAZARDOUS
47
r
, �
SUBSTANCE, AND T�IAT ENABLES LOCAL GfJVERT[MENTS INVtJLy
CLEANUPS TO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SETTLE THEII2 POTE
LIABILITY QUICKLY AND SAFELY.
r
# '
/ �
M
�il
.
v
TRANSPORTATION
PAGE 49 THROUGH 58
�
TRANSPOI2T�TION
AM1VI TRANSPORTATION POLICY STATEMENT
The A�M1Vi believes that the recent passage af the Federal Transpartation Bill (IS
the Metropolitan area with a unique opportunity, to rethink Transporta.tion, Tran;
Development Plans. It is imperative that as we prepare to move into the next cei
transportation network became multi-modal, offer flexibility, invest significantly
be designed to rnanage traffic.
Within the last two decades, the number of miles driven per day has doubled. T�
congestion is expected to increase by 35 % by the yeaz 2000, creating nearly 24�
severely 'congested highways. Ridership by bus, car and van pool, continues to d
Regianal Transit System continues ta be inadequateiy funded. There is a grawin
that the mue cost of driving an automabile, when factoring in energy use, palluti
groductivity loss due to cangestion, and the resulting cost of motor vehicle accic
by the general public at large not solely the driving public. The majority of peak
workers commuting to ar from work. Achieving a balance between workers and
geographic area can reduce the volume of intra azea cammuting and balance the
af the interconnecting roads. Ecanamic stratification and an aging population is �
Iarger pool of transit dependent individuals, Our current transit system is not caF
providing adequate transit services in the entire metropolitan area. Local goverm
facing funding shortfalls which prevent them from adequately maintaining the ci
transpartation netwark.
AMM calls upan the Legislature, MNDOT, RTB, and the Metrapalitan Counc
more comprehensive transportatian program that more closely integrates all mc
transgartation. This coordinated apgroach at the minimum must be designed ta
accessibility, improve air quality, and serve the transit dependent and
supports a comprehensive txansportation policy that;
1. Incorporates traffic management into local and regional zoning and plann
2. Encourages traffic management plans by all employers; Creates a series c
aimed at increasing vehiele occupancy leveis;
4. Di'scourages the use of development incentives for any project of sign�c
daes nat contain a comprehensive traffic management plan;
5. Studies the cancept of jobs to workers balance in the metrapolitan area; �
6. Establishes an adequate dedicated funcling saurce far transit.
�
4
In additian, Ioca1 anits of gavernment must be pravided with adequate funding o
�
legislation that will a11ow them ta maintain their current investments in the lacal
infrastructure. The following recommended legislative propasais are designed to
:A} provides
and
ry, our
transit, and
miles of
;line and the
awareness
illi�73 {L1Y �iQ�
hour trafiic is
obs in a
iirectianal use
reatin� a
of
1 units are
ta develop a
;s of
The AMM
g actions;
incentives
size that
authorizing
this
overall goa1.
V-A STREET, BRIDGE, AND HIGHWAY GENERAL FUNDING
An efiicient transportation system is a vital element in planning for physical, economic, and
social development at the state, regional, and local levels. Funding for current roadway
maintenance reconstruction, and construction of new streets, bridges, and highways in
developing azeas is a signif'icant major element of a competitive and safe transportation system.
Due to past declining state revenues there has been a tendency by the Legislature to divert
much needed roadway funds to, state g�neral expenditure. This trend must be reversed,
especially in light of the Federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
(ISTEA). Funding needs to be expanded to not only keep up with inflation and modest Program
growth, but to provide necessary funds for matching 80/20 projects included in the ISTEA
legislation. .
THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF
FUNDS SO 'THAT NEEDED STREET, BRIDGE, AND HIGHWAY 1l�IAINTENANCE
MAY BE CONTINUED, NECESSARY NW STREET AND HIGHWAY
CONSTRUCTION MAY OCCUR, THE MUl�1ICIPAL STATE AID FUND LEVEL
CONTINUES GROWTH, AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE FEDERAL INTERMODAL
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT OF 1991 (ISTEA) CAN BE MET.
V-B METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM GENERAL FUNDING
Because of the large economically diverse and spreadout population of the Twin City
Metropolitan Area, it is an absolute necessity to provide an effective and efiicient p�2huc mass
transit service augmented by a variety of programs,such as Rideshare and �roject Mobility.
Without a good transit system, many elderly and handicapped persons residing in the area
primarily because of access to unique services would be almost totally immobile. The new
Federal legislation (ISTEA) has established a modern trend by providing over 20% of its total
5 yeaz funding for Transit and allowing a shift of highway funds to transit on a project by
project basis. The Americans Disability Act and new air and noise quality standards will
impact both the way we do transit as well as the cost. In order to obtain IS�'EA funds and to
continue providing reasonable transportation opportunities, the legislature must increase transit
funding priority.
THE AMN REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO CONSIDER THE METROPOLITAN
TRANSIT PROGRAMS AS HIGH PRIORITY AND FUND THEM SUFFICIENTLY TO
TAKE FL�JLL ADVANTAGE OF FEDERAL ISTEA FUNDING AS WELL AS MEET
THE DEMANDS OF ADA AND AIR AND NOI5E STANDARDS. FUNDING
ALTERNATIVES SHOULD INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO THE STATE
GENERAL FUND, MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX OR OTHER 5ALES TAX, THE
FARE BOX, PROPERTY TAX, AND SERVICE EFFICIENCIES.
50
;
� V•C TR:ANSPURTATION SERVICES FUND
� .
A Transportation Services Fund was created for minimal activities and with minim
1991. The Legislature should adopt the recommendadons of the Transportation Stu
and Minnesota Transpartation Alliance which suggests using MVET to fund state�
needs and 'related non highway canstruction activities currently funded from the U:
These are Dept. of Public Safety, Tourism, River Parkway, Safety Counci2 and se�
which aze at best questionable gas tax expenditures,
funding in
Board
ie transit
s Fand.
�aI others
THE AMM ENDORSES THE CO1rTCEPT OF REMOVING NON HIGHWAY
C4NSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES FROM THE STATE TRUNK
HIGHWAY FUND AND THE EXPANSION OF A TRANSPORTATION SER�CE5
, FUND FOR THESE ACTIVITIES. , �
V-D TRANSPOI2TATION HIGHWAY AND TRANSTT FUNDING ALTERP
i
The need for both Highway and transit funding has been increasing signif'icantly i
several years while the resources dedicated or genexally used for these purpases ha
kept pace or been diverted for other state priorities. The new Federal Transportatio
{�STEA) has shifted emphasis by providing signif'icant funds for Transit and also p
increased burden on states by increasing the local match to 20%. Transit needs in 1
Metrapalitan Area have become critical since in same cases Highway expa.nsian is
or financially prohibitive, therefore capacity expansion can best be solved by transi
implementatian in these cases. Funding should be multi source with growth capabi
Therefore, the AMM believes it is time to solve the problem on a permanent basi:
THE AMN SUPPORTS A COMBINED STRATEGY OF GAS TAX INCREA�'
INCLUDING INDEX:ING TO I�:EEP PACE �YTTH HIGHEWAY MAINTENAN
CONSTRUCTION NEEDS AND A DEDICATED MVET OR OTHER TAX S
Ff}IZ TRANSIT FtirNDING EXPANSION. IF THE LEGISLATURE CAs�1NOT
STATUTORY DEDICATION OF SOME FUNDING MECHANISM THEN A
CONSTITUTIONAL SOLUTI4N SHOULD MEl��TED.
i
AS AN ADDITI4N TO THE TRADITIONAL AS TA AND TO PROVTDE
FOR BOTH HIGHWAYS AND TRANSIT, T AM WOULD SUPPORT
TAX C3N GASOLI��IE AT THE PUNIP WTT�-I T IRE 6.5 CENTS ALI
TO TRANSPORTATION.
�
A5 PART OF THE COMBINED STRATEGY, THE STATE LEGISLATURE
CtJNSIDER USING ITS B4NDING AUTHORITY TO PR4VIDE TRANSPOI
INFRASTItUCTURE SINCE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTEREST ]
AND INFLATION °IS SUCH THAT IT IS ADVANTAGEOUS TO MAI�:E SU
STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS.
51
ATIVES
the past
; either nat
Act
alternatives
ASSURE
SALES
CATED
SHOULD
,TATION
;ATES
V-E MSAS FUNDING FOR COMBINED CITY STREET DEPARTMENTS
The State of Minnesota developed in the late 1950s a system for distributing highway funding
to MNDOT, counties, and communities with populadons over 5,000. This system has worked
reasonably effectively to construct and maintain an integrated transportation network within the
State.
In recent years, the State Legislature has established statutes which call for the invesdgation of
benefit that would be obtaineci through consolidation of services and reallocation of resources.
One such area that presents such an option is the consolidation of Public Works and
Maintenance departments within cities, townships,. and counties. Such an opportunity for
streamlining capital expenditures and cost-effective maintenance of an integrated street system
might be best served by recognizing such consolidation through the use of the Municipal State
Aid System.
In that, if two or more governmental units consolidate their maintenance departments, having in
effect a 7oint Powers Agreement which reflects a single entity for budgeting and operations
purposes, then the population of the governmental units participadng in such a Joint Powers
Agreement should be considered in determining the MSAS funding eligibility of these
communides as per MS 162.09.
THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO ENCOURAGE THE '
IMPLEMENTATIOI�T OF COOPERATION AND CONSOLIDATION OF LOCAL
GOVERNMENT SERVICES SUCH AS IS ENVISIONED BY MS 375. THE STATE AID
SYSTEM STATUTES SHOULD BE AMENDED TO ALLOW FOR THE ELI�T_�ILITY
OF COMBINED POPULATION WITHIN INCORPORATED MiJNI(,?,�P�i�T'TIES
HAVING A JOINT POWERS PUBLIC WORK5 AND MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
AND CONTIGUOUS BORDERS, TO QUALIFY FOR MSAS FUNDING UNDER THE
MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET SYSTEM POPULATION CUTOFF RULE OF 5,000.
V-F HIGHWAY JURISDICTIONAL R'EASSIGNMENT, TURNBACKS, AND FUNDING
,
,�
Many commissions, boards, organizations, and now the legislatively reconstituted
Transportation Study Board have studied'or are to study the possibility of reclassifying many
roadways in the state as to appropriate use classificadons and jurisdiction. This reassignment in
the metropolitan area is estimated to shift $6.1 million annually from the state and $1.2 million
annually from the counties to the cities for an increase of $7.3 million annually for general
maintenance and life cycle treatment (i.e. sealcoat, overlays, etc.). Current state law provides
that the state andJor county may declassify a trunk highway and turn it back to a local unit of
government. The only provision is that it must be in good condition. The unit receiving the
highway does not have the option to refuse title and must, tliereafter, maintain the turned back
road. Although reassignments or turnbacks may be added to the MSA system, there may not
be enough maintenance funds for the new mileage, and the receiving city will lose the
52
opgartunity of new NiSA road designatian until its mileage allocation catches
turnback mileage. Reassignrnent rnay be appropriate, but wi11 have a prafound
finances tand future ability to maintain good road systems, especially if certain
rnet and finance alternatives established. Therefore, the AMM offers the follo
to continuing discussion and ongoing studies.
TIIE AMM SUPPQRTS JURISDICTIUNAL REASSIGTEMENT OR TLT�
ROADS ON A PHASED BASIS BASED ON FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICA'
OTHER APPRf3PRIATE CRITERYA SUBJECT TO A CORRESPOND►IN(
MECHANLSM FOR ADEQUATE FUNDING OF ROADWAY IMPROVE]
AND C{}NTINUING MAINTENANCE SINCE CITIES DO NOT CURREh
THE FINANCIAL CAPACITY OTHER THAN SIGNI�'ICANT PROPERT
INCREASE TtJ ABSORB TI-IE ALIDITIONAL ROADWAY 12ESFONSIBII
WITHOUT NEW FUNDYNG SOURCES. THE EXISTING MU1vICIPAL 7
FUND IS NOT ADEQUATE BASED ON CUNTEMPLATED TURNBAC:
;
V-G TRANSPORTATION UTILTTY
Many cities are experiencing aging infrastructure, especially streets which are in
replacement but because of few funding options'continue ta deteriorate. Chapter
issued without eiection require a minimum af 20 percent assessment. Hawever, �
require. a beneiit proaf that the assessment has actually increased. the property va
assessment vaiue. Far street replacement this is neazly impossible. Strict levy Iin
prohibited full levy for the cost but further a general levy far full cost of street i
might be very unfair to non benefiting property as well as higher vaiued classes
general referendum ta replace streets in one aging neighborhood would undaubt�
an entire city. The only remaining option is to Iegisladvely establish a new fnnd
that creates fairness. The best madel available is a utility district similar to one t
storrnsewers which allows assessment annually far shared use on a volume basi
THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TCI ESTABLISH A TRANS]
UTILITY AUTIi0I2ITY F�T{ CITIES TO USE FQR STREET MAINTE�
RECONSTRUCTION SIMILAR TO THE EXISTING STORM SEWER IJ'I�
� I
V-H '3C' TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS - ROLE Ol
OFFICIALS �
i
The transportation plannirzg pracess in the Twin City Meiropolitan Area has been
resporise to a variety of federal and state laws and regulations. The Metropolitan l
(MC) was formally designated by the Legislature in 1974 {1974 MRA) as the ag�
respansibTe for the administratian and coordinadon of said planning process. Inclu
this designatian is the responsibility for long range comprehensive transgortation �
commonly referred ta as the '3C' process (continuous, comprehensive, and caope�
<Federal law and regulations reguired that principal elected officials of general pur�
i
; ( 53
ta the
;ct on city
eria are nat
g as a guide
ENTS 5
L� HAVE
TAX
;d af
� bonds
courts
by the
have
property. A
� nat pass in
mechanism
created for
ATION
E AND
ELECTED
within
.).
local
�
governments be part of,the planning,process: When the Legislature designated the MC as the
transportation planning agency for the metropolitan�area, it also mandated the establishrnent�of
an"advisory.body" to assist the.� �MC, and Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC), and'the
Regional Transit Board,�in ,carrying out.their responsibilities. This advisory body is the
Transportation Advisory: Board, (TAB) .and. contains 17 local elected officials among its
membership of about 30 officials,',The,Federal, Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency
Act (ISTEA) ofl 1991 � againa establishes the need for local elected officials in the '3C', planning
process.
The current .elected official parbicipation and '3C' process has worked reasonably. well in this
Metropolitam Area.
THE ,:AMM SUPPORTS THE CONTINUATION°OF THE� CURRENT, LOCAL
ELECTED OFFICIALS tINVOLVEMENT IN THE"'3C' PROCESS THROUGH THE
TRANSPORTATION: ADV.ISORY�.BOARD TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF THE
FEDERAL INTERMODAL �SURFACE TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1991.
V-I PRESERVATION OF RAILROAD- RIGHT=OF-WAY
Minnesota's system,of railroad grades is rapidly.shifting to a national trunk-line carrier with
few branch lines as one line after• another is abandoned. Minnesota has witnessed the
abandonment of over one-half its rail system since the 1930 peak of 9,360 miles, much in the
past 15 years.
Just as these abandoned rails �:played� an �important part in our transportation history, they
now represent an equally significant opportunity for future generations. Light rail usage,
vegetation reserves , of scientific inter.est, transmission comdors, bicycle ar�d �nowmobile trails,
access roads to remote natural resources, future highways, pipeline corridors are just a few
roles for these abandoned grades.
Although some abandonments were lost for use in past years, the legislature and various state
departments have. now put in'place procedures to preserve and protect future abandonments.
Therefore, .
THE AMM URGES THE �LEGISLATURE AND STATE ADMINISTRATIVE
DEPARTMENTS TO CONTINUE :P�ROGRAMS THAT ENSURE ABANDONED
RAILROAD GRADES BE EXPEDIENTLY PRESERVED UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT
THE FUTURE �PUBLIC 'USE CAN-'BE� DETERMINED. '
V-J CITY SPEED LIMITS
A bill has been introduced which would grant cities the authority to set speed limits on city
roads and streets. �This policy of local,;authority for free standing rural or out state cities may be
feasible but could be extremely. dangerous and. confusing in the metropolitan area. The seven
54
caunty metropolitan area is made up of 140 condguous cities and a number of taw
Because of the campactness of cities in this area, it is aften impossible tu determu
has crossed a boundary from ane city to the next. If one city changes its limits, its
would either have to also change or post many additional signs on each slreet crassing a boundary�
woutd be costly, extremely canfusing to individuais, and might cause same legal problems in case j
Therefare, ' I
e when one
neighbor
This system
>f accidents.
THE AMM SUPPO1tT5 SPEED LIMIT CONTROL OF GITY ROADS AND STREETS °
AS CURRENTLY PROVIDED BY LAW AND OPPQSES CHANGES �O G ANT
GENERAL SPEED LIMTT CONTR.OL TO INDIVIDUAL CITIES.
;
V-K TRANSPORTATIO.N INCENTIVES/DISINCENTNES
The AMM supparts the development af a comprehensive system which will fac
increase in the occupancy levei of cars and enhance the use af transit within the
area. '
A,MM SUGGESTS THE DEVELOPMENT AND PASSAGE OF LEGISLATI
INCLUDES A C(}MMUTER TRIP REDUCTIt�N PRQGRAM A,ND CREA7
SERIES OF TAX INCENTIVES AND/OR IMPACT FEES THAT ENCOUR�
MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY TRANSIT USE. THE STATE LEGISLATURE �
ENCOURAGED TO CONSIDER EXCLUSION FRUM GROSS INCOME Tl
OF COMMUTER TRANSPORTATI(JN BENEF`ITS PRCIVIDED BY AN ENJ
AND PROVIDE A TAX DEDUGTION AND TAX CREDIT FOR EMPLOYE
PROVIDE C011rIMUTOR TRANSPt)RTATION BENEFTTS TO EMPLCiYE:
,
V-L RIEGIONAL TRANSIT SYSTEM
The purpose of a Transportation System is ta provide mohility for people and acc�
and for economic development and services. The most effecdve system will make
use of a1I transportation alternadves and strategies where they are most appropriat�
creating a truly integrated system. Exclusive reliance an only freeways is imprt�de:
possibly cost prohibirive primarily due to social and economic upheaval af esta.bli;
neighborhoods far right of way acquisidon. Transit improvements are imperative,
implernentation of various laad increasing strategies, the capacity is finite and will
unaccepta.ble saturation limits within the foreseeable future. Tl2e AMM supparts
coordination and integration of Transit, includng LRT, and Highway planning and
implementarion.
THE REGIQNAL TRANSIT SYSTEM SHOULD BE A CQMBINATION C
1NTEGRATED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND BE INCLUDEI
PLANNING D�CUMENTS.
; - .
THE SYSTEM CQMPONENTS SHOULD INCLUDE I3t?V LANES, EXP�
�.
ate an
etrapalitan
)N THAT
ES A
.GES
5
:E VALUE
PLOYER
C2S WHO
'S.
.
ssibility to
maximnm
, thus,
t and
hed
�ut even with
reach
IN ALL
BUSES, AND LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT WHICH SHC)ULD BE BUII.T TQ CONNECT
RESIDENTS TO JOB, RETAII,, AND COMMERCIAL CENTERS.
,
THE SYSTEM SH4ULD ALSO INCLUDE A VARIETY OF TRANSTT MpDES,
INCLUDING A TAXI SYSTEM, BUSES, PEDESTRTAN AND BICYCLE FACILI'Y`IES,
AND PARK AND RIDE FACILITIES, ADEQUATE TQ COnfNECT T�IE REGIONAL
CENTERS, MAJOR TRIP GENERATURS AND COMMUNITIES, BC1TH URBAN AND
SUBURBAN,
BUS SYSTEMS AND ESPECIALLY LAT SYSTEMS SI30ULD INCLUDE AMPLE
REGIONAL PARK AND RIDE FACiLITIES FOR AUTOMOBILES, MOTORC'YCLES
AND BICYCLES, WITIi EASY ACCESS, CCINSISTENT WITH TI�E PLAr�tING OF A
REGIONAL ENTITY T4 ACCOMMODATE THE NEEDS OF 7CHE PUBLIC. FEEDER
SYSTEMS S�IOULD BE A MA,T4R CONSIDERATION FClR BUS PARK AND RIDE
AND LAT STATICINS. PLANS SHOULD D BE CONSIDERED TO USE VAN POOLS
ANT1 BICYCLES AS WELL AS WALKING TO FEED THE PARK ANI3 RIDE
FACILITIES FOR EXPRESS BUSES AND LAT.
ALL TRANSIT MCfDES AND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
POLICIES SH4ULD BE GIVEN EQUAL CQNSIDERATIQN NOW AND IN T�IE
FUTURE IN CIRDER TO PROVIDE THE BEST TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
PO5SIBLE TQ THE METROPOLITAN AREA.
V-M MSA SCREENING COMMTTTEE
The Metropolitan Highway Districts 5 and 9 were cambined in 1989190 administrativ�?� to
form one Metropolitan Highway District within the MNDQT structure. B, la�v the MSA
screening committee consists af one member fram each Highway District aiad first class city.
Technically, the combining of Districts 5 and 9 reduces the rnembership by one from the metro
area. This was not intended by I��NDOT. Therefare;
TI�E A�4ZN REQITESTS THAT THE STATUTES BE M4DIFIED TO PRESERi�iE TVYO
SEATS ON THE MSA SCREENING COMMITTEE FROM THE METRCIPOLITAN
�IIGHWAY DISTRICT.
V-N METROPtJLTTAN TRANSPGIRTATI4N TAX
The ANiM membership feels that trar�sportation needs and funding are at a critical point in the
metropolitan area and �cannot be fully met within current financial or tax resource constraints,
Higher occupancy transit systems such as LAT, buses, and other transit facilities must be
examined in the context af a total transportation system in need of added resaurces. A new
metro source af funds should not be a signal for redueed current or future state allocatians,
should be related to use, should be imposed as broadly as possible and to the greatest extent
gossible on the largest beneficiary of the activity funded, shauld be a stable fnnding saurce,
56
and should be totally dedicated to the funded activity. In addition, a new source of�revenue
; should not restrict future local government options. With the foregoing criteria as a basis:
AMM SUPPORTS THE CONCEPT OF A METROPOLITAN TAX FOR
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION NEED5, INCLUDING STREET AND
HIGHWAY FACILITIES, HIGHER OCCUPANCY VEHICLE FACILITIES, AND
TRAN5IT FACILITIE5 (INCLUDING LAT) WITH THE FOLLOWING .
CON5IDERATION: (1) TAXES SUCH AS THE MOTOR FUEL5, MOTOR VEHICLE
EXCISE TAX, SALES TAX, AND PAYROLL TAX SHOULD BE INVESTI�ATED;
AND (2) THE PROPERTY TAX AND GENERAL INCOME TAX SHOULD NOT BE
CONSIDERED. � I
�
V-O AIIZPORT POLICY
In 1987, the Minnesota State Legislature adopted the "Dual-Track" strategy for air
planning. one track focuses on a new airport option; the other on improvements at
airport. The choice will be made when economic, operational, environmental and c
studies are completed by 1996. The Metropolitan Council has identif'ied a search a
Northern Dakota County within which a major airport could be located. Meanwhil
Metropolitan Airport Commission must develop a long range plan to ensure capac:
Minneapolis St. Paul International Airport. By the end of 1995, the Metropolitan �
Commission must also identify a specific airport site within the search area identif
Metropolitan Council. In 1996, both the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolita�
Commission must prepare recommendations on major airport long-term developme
consideration by the Minnesota. Sta.te Legislature.
THE AMM RECOMMENDS AND SUPPORTS THE CONTINUATION OF
TRACK PROCESS TO ASSURE THAT A�,L OPTIONS ARE PROPERLY ]
AS AIl2PORT ISSUES ARE BEING CONSIDERED. THE AMM ENCOUR�
MET120POLITAN COUNCIL AND THE METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS
COMMIS5ION, WFiETHER CONSIDERING A NEW SITE OR IMPROVEr
THE EXISTING SITE, TO THOROUGH�.Y 5TUDY THE SOCIETAL AND
ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF BOTH SITES IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS:
ENVIltONMENT, SOCIAL, SITE AREA, GENERAL LAND USE AND COS
AMM, ALSO ENCOURAGES-THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND TH�
METROPOLITAN AIItPORTS COMMIS5ION TO CONSIDER THE
INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS AT BOTH SITES AS WELL AS THE COST-F
RATIO OF ALL CLASSIFICA�'IONS OF PROPERTY FOR THE AREAS
SURROUNDING BOTH 5ITES , AS STUDIES ARE COMPLETED ON POE
EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL AIRPORT A
RELOCATION OF THE AIRPORT TO A NEW SITE.
� .
I
57
e existing
;t benefits
� in
the
at the
d by the
Airports
t for
'HE DUAL
+;VIEWED,
iE5 THE
ENTS TO
.THE
V-P BIKEVYAY GRANTS PROGRAM
.
Increased suppart needs to be provided for innovative and intermodal transportation programs. :
Dependency on the single accupant automobile must be lessened. All Minnesota governments
should continue to encourage increased energy canservation, travel-demand management,
ride-share programs, bicycle facilities, aiternative fuels, and research and educatian for such
options.
The attractiveness of bicycle transportation is ma:�eimized in urban areas. Traffic calming
projects have been shown to reduce the severity and number of accidents, reduce air and noise
golludan and improve urban streets far non-motorized users. with the increased awareness of
health and fitness, the environmental benefits and cost effectiveness of bicycling, more and
more Minnesotans are demanding safe and convenient bicycle facilities, Lacai governments ,
have expressed interest in enhancing bicycle safery by planriing far and adcling off road trails,
paved shaulders and bicycle starage faciiities and safety grograms in their communiries.
The National Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA} states that
improvements necessary to accammodate other transportation modes are eligible uses of both
National Highway system and Surface Transportation Program funds. ISTEA also requises
each state to set aside 10 percent of its surface transportatian program funds for safety
construction activities, {ie, hazard eli��ination and raii-highway crossings} and 10 percent for
transportarion enhancements which encompass a broad range of environmentally-xelated
activities.
IN KEEPING �VITI3 THE NATI4NAL RECQG1tiiITION OF THE NEED TC}
DECREASE DEPENDANCE ON SINGLE OCCUPANCY AUTOMC���i�5, THE
LEGISLATURE SI30ULD REST{)RE FUNDING FOR �'�-IE BIH:EWAY GRAsdTS
PROGRAM. THE MINNESOTA COMPREHENSIVE BICYCLE PLAN .
RECOMl�'IENDS THAT '"A GRANT PROGRAM BE ESTABLISHED AND
IMPLEMENTED. TO DEVELOP BICYCLE FRIENDLY ZONE5 IN URBAN
AREAS."BICYCLE FRIENDLY ZONES WCIULD INCLUDE BUT NUT BE L�IVIITED
TO CONSTRUCTIQN OF BUTH QN AND 4FF ROAD BICYCLE FACILITIE5,
PUBLIC EDUCATK}N, PROMOTION AND MONITORING. ON RflAD FACILTTIES
COULD VARY FROM STRIFPED PAVED SHOULDERS TO DESIGNATED BICYCLE
LANES.
:
\ -
BOARD OF DIHECTORS
PRESIDENT
Craig R. Rapp
Brooklyn Park
VFCE PRESIDENT
Joan Campbell
Minneapolis
�
��
� ,
as$ociation of
metro olitan
munic� al ities
p
PAST PRESIDENT i
David M. Childs October 17, 1994
Minnetonka
,
o�Ecro�s TO: Managers/Administrators
Bill Bamhart ' r
Minneapolis l��/
FROM: Roger Peterso� Director of Legislative Affairs
Jack Denzer
co"a9e G�o�e RE: Changes to proposed 1995 Legislative Policies and Priorities
Tom Egan
Eagan
Ray Faricy
St Paul
Marie Cximm
St Paul
' Houle
�„omingtan
Susan Hoyt
Falcon Heights
Jerry Linke
Mounds view
Joan Lynch
Shakapee
Gerald Otten
New Hope
Jim Prosser
Richfield
Mary Raymond
Deephaven
Kirk Schnitker
Champlin
Charlotte Shover
Burnsville
William Thompson
Coon Raplds
�n Tinklenberg
e
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Vern Peterson �
,
The Board of Directors at its October 13, 1994 meeting made policy chang
recommenda.tions for membership consideration as indicated below. P1easE
copies of these changes for your Mayor and Council Members.Previous
policy with these changes will be considered at the AMM Policy�Adoption
November 3, 1994 at the Royal Cliff Banquet Facility in Eagan. If you ha
questions, please contact either Vern Peterson or Roger Peterson at 490-331
;
1. III-A-6 Metropolitan Housing Policy (pages 19 and 20)
Policy statement (C) 2) describing possible funding sources
metropolitan enterprise fund on page 20 was deleted in its e�
' (C� 3) renumbered to (C) 2) and amended to read as follows
"The Revenue Sources for this enterprise fund should consi�
combination of state general fund appropriation and metropo
� revenue. If the 1995 Legislature does move forward with th
;
1 metropolitan enterprise fund concept, the AMM B;oard will
i
� a preferred regional funding source (s)." �'-
�
2. III-B-6 Other Development tools (page 28 and 29)
� The first bold face type policy statement dealing with
� abatements was deleted.
3. IV-H-4 (should be IV-G-4) WATER TES'TIl�G CONNEC"TION FEE
� 42� .
t
� The first sentence of the background section on top of page
; read as follows:
i
; "The State's Safe Drinldng Water Act contains a per hook-i
; $5.21 passed in Laws of Minnesota. 1992, Chapter 513, Arti
Section 2 which is to be used to pay for water supply testin
3490 lexington avenue north, st. paul, minnesota 55126 (612) 490-3301
make
� mailed
any
the
tv and
of a
an raised
y�,
�age 41 and
2 should
i fee of
le 6,
�as
� i
�
' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
� i� •
October 14, 199
TO: ; Mayor and City Council �
FROM: ; '
Tom Lawell, City Administratoi�
i
SIIBJECT: Adjourn to Special Closed Meeting to Discuss
, Negotiation Matters
DISCIISSION I
As previously decided, immediately after our October 18,
1994 City Council meeting we will adjourn to a closed session to
discuss upcoming labor negotiation issues. Council is a�are that
labor contracts with both our police and public works em�loyees
expire;on December 31, 1994. I
Prior to initiating labor negotiations, it is important for
staff to fully understand what terms of settlement are acceptable
to the Council. This then ensures that the staff is able to
negotiate with the bargaining units in good faith. I
�
As permitted by State law, this meeting is closed to the
public due to the nature of the discussion (Minnesota Statues
471.705, subd. la). At the meeting, staff will be prepared to
present details regarding the contract proposals submitted by the
bargaining units.
fi
ACTION �RF�4IIIRED �•
Council should adjourn its regular October 18th meeting to a
special! closed meeting to discuss labor negotiation matters.