The URL can be used to link to this page

1988-05-17REVISED CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA MAY 17, 1988 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Agenda Adoption. 4. Approval of the April 19 & May 10 Minutes. 5. Consent Calendar: —14 a. Acknowledgment of April Fire Dept. Report. b. Acknowledgement of Letter from Mn/DOT Regarding TH 13. c. Approval of the List of Contractor Licenses. F' * d. Approval of List of Claims. (Available Tuesday). ,, '1 I End of Consent Calendar. 6. Introductions. x 7. Public Co ments 8. Bid Award and Public Hearing:ae a. CASE NO. 88-09, Copperfield 4th, Rezoning and Preliminary Plat. (Ordinance No. 254 and Re lution No. 88-27). HEARING: 7:45 P.M. 9. Unfinished and New Business: ltt Q A * a. CASE NO. 88-13, Paster Enterprises, CUP for Liquor Store in Shopping Center. (Developer's Agreement and Resolution No. 8W -28j Continued ro May 10 h' meeting. -- — CW'. o _cf,� . b. Parking Ldt pansion fdr Contel.� c'rll� * c. Extension of Mendota Heights Road Bid Award.— (� d. Request for Rezoning to Allow Car ash. (Co tinned from May 10 meeting) . e. Phone System Bid Specifications Approval. — . f. Appointment to Solid Waste Committee. g. Curley' tr et Lights h. Liabiliy Insuranc6 Limits for Contractd`r Licenses v (Ordinance No. 255 and 256). Coufrom 5-10 meeting. 0 1-111666 i. Northland Drive Railroad Crossing Easement Acquisition. —,,4-# SSa�, ** j. Feasibility Report for Bridgevi w Shores. (Resolution No. 88-29). -4. 14. 10. Response to Council Comments. 11. Council Comments. 12. Adjourn. J�� MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS May 17, 1988 To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevin Frazell, City Administrator Re: Add -On Agenda for May 17th An updated agenda is attached on blue paper. Two items prescheduled have been omitted. The first is the presentation from DCCABco-ncerning the County's solid waste mass burn facility; the presenters will contact us about an alternative time. The second deletion is the Eagle Ridge Fire Code Appeal. Staff will be meeting with the Association's attorney next week to resolve some potential code interpretation problems before bringing the variance request to Council for its consideration. One item, 9.j, has been added, and is discussed below. Additional information is submitted for four existing items. 5.d. List of Claims The list of claims is attached. 9.a. CASE NO. .88-13, Paster Enterprises CUP for Liquor Store Attached is a new resolution granting the CUP (an alternative to the one sent in Friday's packet) that elaborates the findings for granting the permit, and setting forth the contingencies, including execution of a developer's agreement. A draft developer's agreement was sent to you yesterday. City Attorney Tom Hart is prepared to discuss a few -minor changes requested by the developer's attorney. The purpose of this evening's discussion is to solicit council comments and directives for the drafting of a final developer's agreement. ACTION REQUIRED Council should provide its input on the developer's agreement. If so inclined, Council may also approve the resolution granting the Conditional Use Permit. 9.c. Extension of Mendota Heights Road Bid Award. Attached is a letter from the low bidder granting an extension to the bid until July 5, 1988. 9.d. Request to Allow Car Wash in B2 Zoning District City Attorney Tom Hart and I have talked with Mr. Birch concerning his assertion that a car wash should be considered as an allowed use in the B2 zone, based on its similarity to uses that are permitted (see attached section from code). We disagree with his legal interpretation, and Tom will be prepared to discuss that position. The only reference to car washes in our zoning code is as a conditional use in B4, the shopping center district. Therefore, it seems that the exclusion of car washes in the B2 (Neighborhood Commercial) and B3 (General Commercial) zones is not an oversight, but the result of a deliberate policy decision: Therefore, if Mr. Birch wishes to pursue the use of his land,for a car wash the appropriate action would be: 1. An application for amendment to the zoning code to include car washes as a permitted or conditional use in B2; or 2. An application for rezoning of the land to B4 and for a conditional use permit for the car wash. At this point it would seem that either option would best be handled and considered as a formal planning application rather than attempting to continue informal discussions. 9.3. Ordering of Bridgeview shores Feasibility Report Please see attached memo from Jim Danielson. Dept lo-Admin Dept ' 15 Engr 60-Utilities 20-Police 70-rar4s r ~av �sea cza�ms ��s� ao-��ze / oo-e�ano�ogELO e � go-Animal contzu.L ue '12: 23 pw o/tv or Mendota Heights /L |/ 40-coo emo Check Number I reup. c:`scx um�er vendor Name Account Code Comment Amount I Azb inso" mS-4305-105-15 *isc sozvs 117'70 1 nzuinson _ 1415-4305-105-15 nozcmt reel '24.2m e _----_ 141'em Totals Temo Check Number z euo Check Number 2 e American wa*z Bank 13-4455-000-00 princ o 75 bonds oo,mmm'mm 2 American Nat! Bank 13-+456-000-00 Int a 75 bonds r,mes'mm e American watz Bank 13-4226-000-00 Fee a 75 bonds 57'54) a 32,062'514) Totals Temp Check Number � emo Check Number o o Arneson Fuel Oil Service _ 01-1210 Diesel 1,36e'1-DO o ---_---- 1,oa2'mm Totals Temo Check Number o emo Check Number 4 4 AT&T m1-4210-w7m-7m otrly svc ' a'ao 4 AT&T 01-4210-020-20 May svc 2-r'a4 4 AT&T -_ 01-4e10-0e0-20 May s,c 3.96 1e _---_ 4m'ao Totals Temp Check Number 4 emo Check Number 5 5 amx Auto Supply 01-4330-490-5w oart 2'22 5 2.22 Totals Temp Check Number 5 emo Check Number s e Board of water Comm 38-4231-844-00 mar engr 86-13 29. 77 6 ey'77 Totals Temp Check Number 6 eoo Check Number 7 7 oi:v motor Supply 01-4330-460-30 parts 5'83 7 City motor ounnzv 01-4330-+40-20 Parts 2242 105'29 . 7 nay 1966 Claims List Page R roe'1,a;ua pm City or Mendota *eights 'emn Check Number 7 Te -'Ip. c'-ecx Jumuer vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount 7 City motor eunozv 01-4330-440-e0 S beams em'wm 7 City Motor auopzv 01-4305-050-50 misc sozvs 37'70 7 City motor Supply 01-4330-440-20 shoes 13'56 35 182.38 Totals Temp Check wumber, 7 remq Check Number a e ooR Cora 01 -*200-600-10 ne Tax 959'70) a oom Corp 01-4200-600-20 RE rax e59'70 a oon Corp 05-4200-600-15 RE Tax 959.75 24 2,879'15 Totals Temp Check Number a remo Check Number 9 ' g svecutvn Systems 01-4e10-040-40 rpr sta ws 33,1-LIm - --_-- � g oo'wm Totals Temp Check Number g remn Check Number Jm 10 Fischers Gas 01-4320-440-20 Headlight ee25 15'00 10 Fiscxers Gas 01-4330-440-20 Tire chanoe 2e25 a'wm 10 F/schers Gas 01-4330-440-e0 vire cho 2e42 a'mm 10 Fischers Gas 01-4330-460-30 nnrs eeya 19'49 ----- -- +w 50.49 Totals Temp Check Number 10 _ remp Check Number /1 11 zowp 01 -440* -110-10 198e Dues 3e0'00 3am'mw Totals Temp Check Number 11 remp Check Number 1e ' za zomn no 01-207e o/a a 5/20 Payroll 1*7'7E, 12 zomn no 01 -413* -110-10 5/6 e 5/20 Payroll 156.94 24 304.66 Totals Temp Check Number �e Temp Check Number 13 13 Tom Knuth 88-4415-828-00 th5/11 7.87 7 May 1988 Claims List Page 3 tc? '12:23 PM City of Mendota Heights "ergo Check Number 13 Temp. Chack lumber Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount 13 Tom Knuth 31-4415-839-00 thru 5/11 71.1141 13 Tom Knuth 49-4415-854-00 thru 5/1122.73 13 Tom Knuth 03-4415-105-15 thrU 5/11 3.37 52 11215. 07 Totals Temp Check Number 13 remo Check Number 14 14 Langula Hdwe 01-4330-490-70 Misc parts 85.62 14 Langula Hdwe 01-4330-490-70 80.00 28 165.62 Totals TemD Check Number 14 remo Check Number 15 15 League Mn Cities 01-4400-110-10 Annl conf 130.00 15 League Mn Cities 01-4400-109-09 580.00 30 710.00 Totals TeMD Check Number 15 remo Check Number 16 16 Mendota Hghts Rubbish 01-4280-310-50 Apr Svc 47.75 16 Mendota Hahts Rubbish 01-4280-310-70 47.70 16 Mendota Hghts Rubbish 15-4280-310-60 47.73 16 Mendota Hahts Rubbish 01-4280-315-30 34.50 64 177.68 Totals Temp Check Number 16 Feri.p Check Number 17 17 Midwest Siren Service 07-4330-000-00 May mtcn 62.40 17 62. 40 Totals Temp Check Number 17 Femo Check Number is IS Minn Dept of Revenue 01-4320-050-50 Apr fuel tax 55.80T 55.80 Totals Temp Check Number 18 Check Number 19 19 Minnesota Teamsters Loc 320 01-2075 May dues 175.00 175. 00 r May 1988 me *12:23 pm eno Check Number .anp. oliecx umoer Vendor Name 214) sm Northern States Power 20 Northern States power 20 Northern States power 20 Northern States Power em Northern States Power am Northern States Power 20 Northern States power --- 14m Totals Tertip, Check Number emo Check Number 21 ez Northwestern oezz Telephone ez Northwestern eezz Telephone 21 Northwestern eezz Telephone 21 Northwestern eezz Telephone e1 Northwestern eezz Telephone 21 Northwestern gezz Telephone 126 Totals Temo Check Number emp Check Number e2 Norwest Bank mozs ee Norwest Bank mpzs _ 44 Totals Temp Check Number Claims List Page 4 City or Mendota Heights Account Code Comments Amount 01-421e-315-30 May svc 90.98 mI-��zu-auw-rw wav svc �s'ms 15-421e-400-60 May svc 17'85 01 -*211-315-30 May svc 2*1'73 01-4211-420-50 maysvc 98.24 01-4e11-320-70 May svc 36'm5 15-4211-400-60 May svo 65.8e 23 ------ 619.76 am 24 01-4210-110-10 mav Svc e73.69 01-4210-0e0-20 may svc 326'10 05-4210-105-15 May Svc 78'03 15-4210-060-60 May svc 311.41 01-4210-050-50 May s,c 34'58 01-4e10-070-70 May svc 34.56 e4 peat Marwick main u Co 1,1458. 37 e1 ' 24 Peat Marwick wain 12-4456-000-00 Int 87 sp cert 11,450'0141 1e-4226-000-00 Fee 87 Eq cert 375.00 ee 03-4ee0-130-00 '' --------- 11,a25.m0 'amp Check Number 23 23 oxygen Service co. 01-4305-050-50 ovl thru 4/15 4'e0 23 oxygen Service Co. 01-4305-030-30 cyv toru 4/15 e.40 4s 12'am Totals Tema Check Number 23 'emp Check Number 24 e4 neat Marwick main u Co 01-42e0-130-10 progress billing 4,750'00 e^ Pea* Marwick main a Co 05-42e0-130-15 orunress b/zzins 830.00 e4 peat Marwick main & C 21-4220-130-00 " 120'1410 e4 peat Marwick main u Co 10-4220-130-00 " 1e0'00 24 Peat Marwick wain a co 16-4e20-130-00 " yaw'mm ' e4 peat Marwick main & Co 03-4ee0-130-00 '' 640.00 24 peat Marwick wain & Co 15-4e20-130-60 " 610'00 24 peat Marwick main & Co 14 -*220-130-00 " 1,970.14KA ___ 1%� _________ 10,000'00 c` May zsaa Claims List Page 5 rve,12:23 nm oi*v or Mendota Heights reso Check Number 25 renp. uhecx vumoer Vendor Name Account Code Comment Amount 25 Public Emoz net Assn m1 -41o1 -11m -1m May orem 18.00 uo Public smnl net Assn 05-4131-105-15 ^ za'mm e5 Public smoz nex Assn 01 -4131 -0e0 -e0 ^ s'mw 25 Public Emoz net Assn --- 01-4131-040-40 ^ g'ww /wm ----- 54.00 Totals Temo Check Number e5 rem= Check Number ea ua sur Office Products 05-4300-105-15 Tane 23.76 26 Sur Office Products 01-4300-020-20 desk try 6.28 5e ----- 3m'm4 Totals Temp Check Number �s rsmo Check Number er 27 Seven Corners Ace Hdwe 01-4330-460-30 wisc parts 57.75 27 Seven Corners Ace Huwe' 01-4305-050-50 misc 50lys 36.53 54 _-_-_ s4'za Totals Temo Check Number er 'emp Check Number �e 28 z L ohiezv Co 15-4305-060-60 '' e6e'10 28 z L Shiezx co 2e-4330-000-00 " 6e5'/9 ua J L enie/y Co 01-4305-070-70 Cl o key 75.65 ea z L ahiezy Co 01-44ee-050-50 '' 39'76 112 1,003.30 ` Totals Temo Check wommsr ee 'e.mo Check Number es ag Snyder Drug Stores -- 01-4305-0e0-20 oictures 12'54 ee ----- 1e'54 Totals Temo Check Number 29 enp Check wommar 3w am ono*hview Chevrolet -- 01-4330-440-20 part 224* 10'58 om 1m'5a Totals Temo Check Number aw emo Check Number 31 31 oonthview Garden Center 01-4305-070-70 sorinuzer ` 39,59 Is 7 May 1986 Claims List Pace 6 ,� *P: C ue '3 PM City of Mendota Heialits emo Check Number 31 -7e,-,10. C.' -i sck woer Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount Totals Tertio Check Number 31 ewo Check Number 32 32 St Paul Book & Stationery 01-4305-030-30 solys 12.64 32 12. 60 Totals Temp Check Number 32 emo Check Number 33 33 St Paul Stamp Works 01-4490-800-90 doo. taus 65.00 33 65.00 Totals Temp Check Number 33 E?r..,,o Check Number 34 34 Sun Newsoaoers 01-4240-110-10 hro not lip lic Marriot 12.9'3 34 12.92 Totals Temp Check Number 34 emo Check Number 35 35 Uniforms Unlimited 01-4410-020-20 Shirts Bridger 75.45 35 Uniforms Unlimited 01-4410-020-20 svc stripes 121.50 70 196.95 Totals TefflD Check Number 35 emo Check Number 36 36 United Central Trustee 01-2071 May prem 4.63 36 United Central Trustee 01-4132-020-20 68.16 36 United Central Trustee 01-4132-050-50 17.t-414 36 United Central Trustee 15-4132-060-60 8.52 36 United Central Trustee 01-4132-070-70 17.01 180 115.36 Totals Temp Check Number 36 'emo Check Number 37 37 Winthrop & Weinstine 16-4220-000-00 Mar svc Re No Dr RR 388.80 37 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4220-120-80 Mar svc Kensin.oton 250.00 37 Winthrop & Weinstine 85-4220-000-00 Mar svc Re Boring Inc 27.00 37 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4221-120-10 Mar Svc 500.00 37 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4490-110-10 Mar svc 34.40 37 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4222-120-20 Mar pros 1,227.39 -------- --- =--- 1-:1 P 2_427-59. 'r-4- m I= Tonin Ni trnhgar- 37 7 -ay 1968 Claims Lis: Pape 7 uc-? 1e:e3 pm City or Mendota neioh*s emn Check Number oa Te"o- oh.ecx u"ver vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount za z o a -- 01-4Z3m-490-e0 May mtcn 115'37 oa 115.37 Totals Temp Check Number 38 emo Check Number 39 os neo Rentals 01-4305-070-70 Roto hammer 18. L710 og neo Rentals 01-4335-310-50 Floor mton 20'30 oe neo Rentals 01-4335-310-70 " e0'30 39 eac Rentals 15-4335-310+60 ^ em'ow 156 ----- 78.90 Totals Temp Check Number 39 emp Check Number 40 40 American Business Forms -- 15-4300-060-60 Utility billing cards 569'79 4m ------ 5ag'rs Totals Temp Check Number 40 emp Check Number 41 41 Donald n Anderson 15-4305-060-60 oommz swr readings 85.00 41 Donald n Anderson -- 15-4415-060-60 mileage meter readinos 14'85 ue ----- yg'8o Totals Temp Check Number 41 Rmp Check Number +2 ws Bills Gan Shoo 01 -4305 -0e0 -e0 '' 25'66 *e Bills Gun Shop 01-4305-020-e0 ommo 36.52 42 Bills Gun Shoo 01 -*305-0e0-20 Binoculars 189'00 4e Bills Gun Shoo 01-4305-020-e0 miso spzvs 49.22 168 ------ owe.*m Totals Tema Check Number 42 amp Check Number *3 43 Collins Electrical -- 31-4460-639-00 nymt 3 86-11 44-771'79 43 44,771'7s Totals Temp Check Number 43 amp Check Number 44 44 Communications Center- -- 01-4403-030-30 1st resnonder course 67e'00 ------ 7 r,!ay 1988 Claims List Paoe ue 1!2:23 PM City of Mendota Heights er-ii-, Check Number 45 C eck lumcer Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount 43 Biffs Inc 01-4200-610-70 Rent 4/15 thru 5/31 451.50 45 Totals Temo Check Number 45 451.50 emo Check Number 46 46 Business Records Coro 10-4300-000-00 election ballots 192.70 46 192.70 Totals Temp Check Number 46 emp Check Number 47 47 County Recorder 49-4475-654-00 filing fee 20.00 47 20. t'410 Totals Temp Check Number 47 emo Check Number 48 48 Fisher Photo Soly Co 01-4490-020-20 film 62.55 48 62.55 Totals Temo Check Number 48 emo Check Number 49 49 Flaherty Eq Coro 15-4330-490-60 oil filters 10.80 49 10.80 Totals Temp Check Number 49 amo Check Number 50 50 Fire Watch Inc 01-4335-315-30 Annl auto fire trot 67.50 50 67.5141 Totals Temo Check Number 50 emo Check Number 51 51 First Trust 12-4456-000-00 Int 1965 eq cert 6,475.00 51 G, 475. 14) 0 Totals Temp Check Number 51 2?mD Check Number 52 52 Genl Communications 01-4330-450-30 oager rocs 24.80 -5 r Aav 198e Claims List pace y 'oe Pm City or menoota Heights Check Number oo Temp. c�ecu /.vv"er vendor Name Arcoun* Code Comment Amount oo w w orainoep Inc 01-4305-030-30 Quartz clock ::16. 36 53 w w Grainger Inc 01-4305-030-30 wisc soz.s 105. 15 131'51 Totals Temp Check Number 53 remo Check Number 54 54 zn*z Assn o o p 01-*402-020-20 Trnn volume 65'00 54 so.mw Totals Temp Check Number 54 remD Check Number 35 . 55 Independent Black Dirt co e5-4460-829-00 Black dirt 20w'00 55 200. 00 Totals Temp Check Number 55 ` remp Check Number 56 oa oanrwon Data System 08-4220-000-00 ' nor svc IF, 5. 5s 165. 00 Totals Temp Check Number 56 re^.p Check Number 57 57 Richard Knutson Inc 8e-4*60-82e-00 Pvmt 2 85-3 17,10w'00 57 17,101-41'014 Totals Temp Check Number 57 remo Check Number oa 58 Kremer Sorg a Align 01-4330-*90-50 cart 301 1'25. 00 -----_ -_ oa 1e5'mw Totals Temo Check Number 58 r�uo Check Number 59 59 AQro Minn 15-4300-060-60 printer ribbons 38.04 ----_ _- 5s za-m* Totals Temp Check Number og "e-to Check Number am ` 60 Kustom Electronics 01-4330-450-20 ror soeaker146.13 r Ylay 1988 Claims List Pace 10 xe i2:23 Pm City or Mendota mezq*ts e'�o Check Number 60 oneck /m,uer Vendor Name Account code Comments Amount Totals Tewn Check Number 60 eoo Check Number 61 a/ Pitney Bowes Credit Corp 01-4330-490-20 May pvmt 156'00 az ------ 15s'mw rc*azs Temp Check Number 61 enp Check Number 62 62 William Lerbs 01-4300-030-30 Reimburse expenses 4e'79 ae William Lerbs 01-4335-315-30 '' 48.81 62 William Lerbs 01-4330-460-30 '' 1e'e6 /aa ------ 1zm'as Totals Temp Check Number ae enp Check Number so ao u*ozr EaA Co 01-4133-110-10 e mos aa nrem 870,10 63 LwozT Eon Co 01-4131-020-e0 ^ 14,4+4.15 63 LmozT Eon co 01-4133-031-30 a mos as prem 2-256'90 ' aa LmozT EoA Co 01-4133-040-40 a mos aa prem oam'zm 63 LmozT soA Co 01-4/33-050-50 '' 5,35e.70 ao Lmozr son Co 01-+133-070-70 ^ 2,611'55 ao Lmozr sam Co 05-4133-105-15 '' 3,e65'65 ao LmozT Eon Co 15-4133-060-60 ^ 2,160,15 63 Lmozr sow Co --- 01-1215 4 Mos ue orem 16,1e0'70 567 --------- 4a`o6e.mw Totals Temo Check Number ao ' emp Check Number 64 64 Lindberg Pierce -- 06-4220-000-00 Re orof svc o H ` 9,410,00 64 -------- 9, 410.1-410 Totals Temo Check Number 64 eup Check Number 65 65 Minn Green Industry ea -- 01-4400-070-70 negr 27. V1141 65 ----- e7'mw Totals Temp Check Number 65 smp Check Number 66 66 Minn City momt Assn -- 01-4404-110-10 nnnz dues 35.00 35.1410 7 r!av 1988 Claims List Page 11 me »e:e3 pm City of Mendota oeiohts emp Check Number 67 Temp. Check Iumuer Vendor Name Account Code comments Amount 67 mac Connection 01-4301-020-e0 rounderwear umc'mm a7 ------ 202.00 Totals Temp Check Number 67 rema Check Number se ae MTI uistr -- 01-4330-490-70 misc parts 253'34 aa ------ u53'34 Totals Temp Check Number 68 emo Check Number as ae John maczxo 01-4305-030-30 neimb expense paid out 31.54 69 31.54 . Totals Temp Check Number 69 emo Check Number 70 ' 70 Jerry Nelson -_ 01-4305-030-30 cabinet am.ww . 70 60.00 am'mw Totals Temp Check Number 71ZZI emp Check Number 71 71 E * ove»z -- 01-4300-0e0-20 forms 159'e3 71 1o9'aa Totals Temp Check Number 71 emp Check Number 72 ra Pepsi 7 up -- 01-4330-4e0-50 rors w��°me*u keA� 53.14 72 ---__ 5o'14 Totals Temp Check Number 72 emo Check Number 73 � 73 Peterson Seed Co 85-4460-8e9-00 lawn seed ee'50 73 Peterson Seed co 01-4305-050-50 '' 185'00 14a 277'5w Totals Temp Check Number ro emp Check Number 74 r I'lay zgaa Claims List paoe 12 oe oe,23 pm City of Mendota ms/uxts 'emo Check Number 7* remo. chi-ck lumber Vendor Name Account code Comment Amount ,otazs Temo Check Number 74 'euo Check Number 75 75 Quality Industries -- 01-4330-490-70 Belt seat 54'52 75 o4'5e Totals Temo Check Number 75 'emo Check Number 76 76 State Mechanical Inc -- 22-4330-000-00 Re stm dmn 1,000.00 76 -------- 11000.00 Totals Temp Check Number 76 emo Check wwnuer 77 77 State of Minn -_ 05-440+-105-15 Enur z�c renewal 77 52'mm rc*azs Temp Check Number 77 � e*p Check Number 78 . 78 Software Answers 01-4620-020-e0 software 385'00 78 ' ------ 385.00 oa5'mm Totals Temo Check Number 78 emo Check Number 79 7e Tractor Supply 1 ^ ` 38'25 ra Tractor Supply __- 01-4305-050-50 mis� parts s'se ` 158 �a^�� Totals Temo Check Number 7e ewo Check Number 80 am American watl Bank 01-4490-ttw-10 RE audit expense 30.00 ' am . 3m'mw Totals Temp Check Number aw amp Check Number 81 81 nzzieu Test Drilling co 43-4236-647-00 omiz inv ar-u 685,e5 a1 ------ aa5'25 e 7 Iav 1988 Claims List Paoe 13 uo P2:23 PM City of Mendota Heights emo Check Number 81 T e mo. Ch -ick �_moer Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount 199. 794.40 `IZ 667 rand Total MANUAL CHECKS: 11704 493.99 Petty cash account Reimburse petty cash 11705 15.00 John Lerbs Softball Umpire 11706 15.00 Jon Stenhaug " 11707 15.00 Anita Maczko " 11708 15.00 Marley Kendall " 11709 15.00 John Boland " 11710 15.00 North Star Chapter 5/13 Meeting 11711 15.00 Jon Stenhaug Softball Umpire 11712 9,954.00 DC Bank 5/6 FIT, FICA, MEDICARE 11713 6,018.44 Commissioner REvenue 4/22 & 5/6 SIT 11714 5,968.60 PERA 4/22 Payroll 11715 645.00 DC Bank 5/6 Payroll Deductions 11716 3,699.52 SCCU " 11717 31,126.87 City M.H. Payroll Acct 5/6 Net Payroll 11718 140.00 MPCA P1 review 87-7 11719 150.00 Mn Dept of Health " 11720 15.00 Jon Lerbs Softball 11721 15.00 Anita Maczko " 11722 15.00 Marley Kendall " 11723 15.00 John Boland " 11724 594.60 Kenneth Hoack Final FF pay 11725 42,434.52 American Watl Bank Interest payment City Hall lease 101,390.54 G.T. 301,184.94 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR LIQUOR STORE IN MENDOTA PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER WHEREAS, Mr. Edward J. Paster has applied to the City of Mendota heights for a Conditional Use Permit for a liquor store within the Mendota Plaza Shopping Center; and WHEREAS, Pastbr Enterprises has'committed itself to a substantial upgrading and remodeling of the Center; and WHEREAS, the Council has determined that when considered as an integral part of the proposed improvements to the Center, the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the community, will not depreciate surrounding property values, and is in harmony with the general purpose of the zoning ordinance and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan of the City. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that a Conditional Use Permit for a 7,500 square foot MGM Liquor Warehouse International store, as detailed in the'application materials for Planning Case No. 88-13, be granted within the Mendota Plaza Shopping Center, 750 South Trunk Highway 110, subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval by the City Council of the final plans and specifications for the remodeling of the shopping center. 2. Execution of a Developer's Agreement providing adequate security to the City to ensure completion of the remodeling improvements. 3. That the proposed liquor store tenants acquire and maintain required Citylliquor licenses. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17th day of May, 1988. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS M ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk Snow Plowing &. Removal May 13, 1988 F. M. FRATTALONE EXCAVATING & GRADING, INC. COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL 3066 Spruce Street / St. Paul, MN. 55117 ave .10 City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 Attn: Mr, James E, Daneislon Public Works Director Re: Mendota Heights Road - MSA Project #140-103-08 Huber Drive - MSA Project #140-104-02 Job No. 8519, Improvement #86, Project #1 Visitation Drive - Job #8519B Improvement #86, Project #113 Dear Mr. Daneislon: In reference to your letter the above mentioned project, in the amount of $585,505,59 July 5, 1988, Sincerely. Phone: (612) 484-0448 Fax: (612) 484-7839 dated May 11, 1988 regarding we agree to extend our bid to the bid award date of F. M. FRATTALONE EXCAVATING & GRADING, INC, Frank M, Frat lone President FMF/ln SECTION 13. "B-2" NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT _1/ 13.1 Permitted Uses Within any "B-2", Neighborhood Business District, no structure or land shall be used except for one (1) or more of the foll- owing uses, or uses deemed similar by the Council. 13.1(1) Antique or gift shop. 13.1(2) Appliance store. 13.1(3) Art and school supply store. 13.1(4) Auto accessory store. 13.1(5) Bakery good sales and baking of goods for retail sales on premise. 13.1(6) Banks and banking institutions without drive-in facilities. 13.1(7) Barber Shop. 13.1(8) Beauty shop. 13.1(9) Bicycle sales and repair. 13.1(10) Book, office supply and stationery store. 13.1(11) Candy, ice cream, popcorn, nuts, frozen dessert and soft drink shop but not of the drive-in type. 13.1(12) Camera and photographic supply store. 13.1(13) Delicatessen and/or dairy store. 13.1(14) Drug store. 13.1(15) Dry cleaning and laundry pick-up stations including incidental pressing and repair. 13.1(16) Dry goods store. 13.1(17) Gift or novelty store. 13.1(18) Grocery, fruit or vegetable store. 13.1(19) Hardware store. 0 13.1(20) Hobby store including handicraft classes not to exceed ten (10) students. 13.1(21) Jewelry sales and repair store. 13.1(22) Laundromat of the self-service type. 13.1(23) Library. 13.1(24) Newsstand. 13.1(25) offices. 13.1(26) Paint, wallpaper sales. 13.1(27) Photographic studio. 13.1(28) Pipe and tobacco shop. 13.1(29) Record shop. 13-1(30) Traditional restaurant cafe, tea room, with no drive-in or fast food facility. 13.1(31) Shoe sales and repair. 13.1(32) Small appliance repair shop. 13.1(33) Sporting goods store. 13.1(34) Variety store. 13o1(35) Wearing apparel shop. (401) 58 13.2 Conditional Uses Within any "B-2", Neighborhood Business District, no struct- ure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit. 13.2(1) Tavern. 13.2(2) Theaters, but not of the drive-in type. 13.2(3) Private lodges and clubs. 13.2(4) Accessory structures other than private garages. 13.2(5) Essential service structures. 13.2(6) Animal Hospital (Veterinary C inic). As used hereunder the n*c term "Animal Hospital" or "Vet rinary Clinic" shall be deemed to mean a facility for the dia nosis, treatment and medical care of small animals, in which all professional services are conducted within an enclosed building and which excludes the kenneling of such animals ex pt for the time period nec- essary to provide medical care therefor. DA 04 �3t 64 Any conditional use permit for an Animal Hospital (Veterinary Clinic) shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. No noise from the operation of the facility shall be discernible beyond the boundaries of the lot on which the use is conducted. To achieve noise con- trol, the facility shall be of masonry construction with outside walls at least 8" thick, and with a precast concrete roof. 2. Odor control shall consist of a ventilation system designed so that no odors or organisms will spread between wards or to the outside air. An air condi- tioning system may be required, with windows double glazed with fixed sash. 3. An approved system shall be provided for the storage and disposal of dead animals off the premises. 4. Large dog facilities for indoor exercise of such animals shall be provided. No outside pens shall be permitted. 5. When abutting a residential district, an approved screening and landscaping plan shall be filed and developed along the property boundary lines that abut the "R" District. 6. Hours at which the facility will be open to the public for the receiving and pick up of animals shall be approved by the City Council to insure compatibility with surrounding land uses. (401) 59 r� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO MAY 17, 1988 X TO: Mayor, City Council and Cit yi trator FROM: James E. Danielson, P.W. Director SUBJECT: Marvin Anderson Homes (Bridgeview Shores) Feasibility Study DISCUSSION• Marvin Anderson Homes has petitioned the City to begin a feasibility study for their first phase of Bridgeview Shores (see attached petition). Because there is a long time (three weeks) before the next Council meeting and because staff has the time to work on the report between now and then, we would like to have the petition accepted and the study ordered tonight. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends the Petition for Bridgeview Shores Phase I feasibility study be accepted and the feasibility report ordered. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommend- ation, they should pass a motion adopting the attached Resolution No. 88-29, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR BRIDGEVIEW SHORES". JED:madlr attachments 100% PETITION FOR IMPROVEMENTS AND WAIVER OF HEARING SANITARY SEWERS, WATERMAINS, STORM SEWERS, AND STREETS We, the undersigned, being the owners of all of the real property abutting upon the following street, alley, or public way between the points indicated: Phase I Bridgeview Shores Lots 1-3, Block 1, Lots 1-4, Block 2, Lots 1-5, Block 3, Lots 1-14, Block 4 hereby petition the City Council of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to undertake without a public hearing under Minnesota Statutes, Section 429,031, the following improvements along said street, alley or public way: The construction of an extension to the City's sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water distribution systems, including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acquisition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets and easements in the above described area. The construction of street improvements consisting of the acquisition of easements and the grading, stablization, drainage and bituminous surfacing, and the construction of concrete curbs and gutters on the streets to be situated in the above described area. and to assess the entire cost thereof against our property abutting said improvements based on benefits received without regard to cash valuation. Signature of Owners* Address Date 7 9 *Property owned in joint tenancy should be signed by each owner. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ALL ABUTTING PROPERTY: Phase I Bridgeview Shores Lots 1-3, Block 1, Lots 1-4, Block 2, Lots 1-5, Block 3, Lots 1-14, Block 4 I hereby certify that I have examined the above petition and appropriate real estate records and find that said petition is in proper form and is signed by all the owners of property abutting said improvements. WITNESS my hand as such Clerk and the said of said City this _ day of , 19 Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk (SEAL) City of Mendota Heights I City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR BRIDGEVIEW SHORES WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the City Council requesting sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water and street improvements to serve Bridgeview Shores Subdivision and adjacent areas. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the above described petition be and is hereby accepted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights. 2. That the City Engineer be and is hereby authorized and dir- ected to prepare a feasibility study as to whether said proposed im- provements are feasible, whether said improvements should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and as to the estimated cost of said improvement. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17th day of May, 1988. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor 1. Call to Order. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA MAY 17, 1988 - 7:30 P.M. 2. Roll Call. 3. Agenda Adoption. 4. Approval of the April 19 & May 10 Minutes. 5. Consent Calendar: a. Acknowledgment of April Fire Dept. Report. b. Acknowledgement of Letter from Mn/DOT Regarding TH 13. c. Approval of the List of Contractor Licenses. d. Approval of List of Claims. (Available Tuesday). ,.ems End of Consent Calendar. 6. Introductions. 7. Public Comments. 8. Bid Award and Public Hearing: a. CASE NO. 88-09, Copperfield 4th, Rezoning and Preliminary Plat. (Ordinance No. 254 and Resolution No. 88-27). HEARING: 7:45 P.M. 9. Unfinished and New Business: a. CASE N0. 88-13, Paster Enterprises, CUP for Liquor Store in Shopping Center. (Developer's Agreement met, �-� and Resolution No. 88-28). Continued from May 10 meeting. / AS. DCCAB Presentation. (Representatives will be present). mac. Eagle Ridge Fire Code Appeal. (Members will be � vv�l present) . d. Parking Lot Expansion for Contel. e -ie. Extension of Mendota Heights Road Bid Award.- �-�5 C., f. Request for Rezoning to Allow Car Wash. (Continued from May 10 meeting). Li J4 ojV-10 g. Phone System Bid Specifications Approval. h. Appointment to Solid Waste Committee. i. Curley's Street Lights. jj. Liability Insurance Limits for Contractor Licenses. (ordinance No. 255 and 256). Continued from 5-10 meeting. 1fi( k. Northland Drive Railroad Crossing Easement isit, 5-2 *A-,4 - -'iO. Response to Cou 1'romments. 11. Council -Comments. 12. Adjourn: M Page No. 2319 April 19, 1988 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, April 19, 1988 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Cummins, Hartmann, Blesener and Witt. PROCLAMATION Former Administrator, Orvil Johnson, was present to request Council to proclaim May 4th as Cities Day. Mr. Johnson stated that he has been working with Councilmember Witt and former Mayor Lockwood in an attempt to put together as Cities Day celebration proposed to be held at the new city hall site. Mr. Johnson described what Cities Day is and that its purpose this year is to celebrate the 75th anniversary of the League of Minnesota Cities. He indicated that the League has selected Mendota Heights as the lead City for Cities Day and described the program that will be conducted. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 AGENDA ADOPTION Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolution No. 88-18, "RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MAY 4, 1988 AS CITIES DAY IN MENDOTA HEIGHTS." Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of the revised agenda for the meeting. With the addition of item i1/2, City Hall Change Order. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of the minutes of Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Abstain: 1, Blesener Page No. 2320 April 19, 1988 the April 5th pre -council meeting with corrections. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the Minutes of the April 5th meeting. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Abstain: 1, Blesener Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of the Minutes of the April 12th Board of Review meeting. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of the consent calendar, along with authorization for execution of all necessary documents contained therein. a. Acknowledgement of the Fire Department monthly report for March. b. Approval of partial payment No. 5 to the Joseph Company, Inc. in the amount of $116,713.20 for City Hall construction. c. Acknowledgement of the Minutes of the March 8th Park and Recreation Commission meeting. d. Acknowledgement of the Treasurers Monthly report for March. e. Acknowledgement of a status report on 1987-1989 Target Issues. f. Approval of a change in the site plan for 727 Spring Creek Circle authorizing location of the home 40 feet from the wetlands area. g. Acknowledgement of a response from Dakota County regarding a traffic study relating to stop signs at Page No.2321 April 19, 1988 Victoria Road and Marie Avenue, along with direction to the Public Works Director to respond to Dakota County that the City Council believes there are conditions and considerations over and above the normal warrants for stop signs at this intersection. h. Approval of an increase in the mileage reimbursement from 21 cents per mile to 22.5 cents per mile. i. Acknowledgement of a letter from Bill Owens expressing appreciation to Mike Maczko and Terry Blum on behalf of Mend -Eagan Athletic Association and its hockey program. j. Approval to hire six summer workers for the public works department. k. Approval of the List of Contractor Licenses dated April 19, 1988 and attached hereto. 1. Approval of the List of Claims dated April 19, 1988 and totalling $221,043.56. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Wayne Schwanz, 591 Hiawatha Avenue was present to request the vacation of the Eugenia Street right-of-way and alleys in his area. Mayor Mertensotto stated that residents can petition the City Council to hold a public hearing on vacations or that the Council can initiate proceedings on its own. Council directed that staff look into the matter to determine whether there is a need for retaining the public street right-of-way and alley right-of-way. Mr. Ken Petchel, 645 Quail Ridge Circle, was present to ask that Council adopt regulations to require dog owners to be responsible for the cleanup of animal wastes in neighborhood parks. AIRCRAFT NOISE City Treasurer, Larry Shaughnessy, as the City's representative to the MASAC, showed the audience a combined map designating air corridors and noise impacts on the communities of Mendota Heights and Eagan. He then explained the position of the City Council relative to air traffic corridors and other aircraft noise issues. Page No. 2322 April 19, 1988 Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and comments from the audience. Mr. Dave Bjorklund, 635 Quail Ridge Circle, asked why there is no attempt on the airport's part to fly five to six miles out from the runways before initiating turns and why the aircraft are not staying within the 15 degree corridor. Mr.'Joe Maher, 1872 Summit Lane, asked what the time table is for initiating changes. He asked when the Metropolitan Airport Commission will give its recommendations to the FAA and what will happen if the FAA doesn't cooperate. Mr. Jerry Frank, 2317 Nashua Lane, stated that he believes the City Council has taken a strong position on the issue and that the five degree turn off runway 11 R does not only make sense, it also adds to the safety factor. He stated that he would like to see the City consider taking an all or nothing position on the matter in its discussions with the City of Eagan. He stated that in his opinion there is a big difference between a 10 and a 15 degree separation on runway 11L and that the City should hold fast to its position. Mr. Gaylen Funk asked whether Council understand the implications of its proposal on the Rogers Road area. He stated that if the planes are not allowed to make the quick turns they currently do, the impact of air noise over his area will be significantly greater. Mayor Mertensotto responded that 65 percent of the owners in the Furlong area have indicated that they would be interested in selling there homes if they could get true value for them. He also stated that there are five homeowners in the Rogers Road area who would also like to sell because the air traffic noise is so significant. He informed the audience that the Council has selected an appraiser and is trying to address the issue of buying out those particular properties. Mrs. Rita Joseph, Walsh Lane, stated that until recently the air traffic noise over her area was not a problem, but that last year the noise was unbelievable and that at times it feels as though the planes are going to take the top of her house off. The Council informed the audience that it is very important, especially within the next month, that the Page No. 2323 April 19, 1988 property owners affected by aircraft noise contact the Metropolitan Airports Commission when they have a complaint over the noise issue. Mr. Jim Stubbs , 784 Lower Colonial Drive, asked what area would the Council anticipate will have increased air noise problems because of the new highland pattern. Mr. Lyonel Greenberg, 746 Pontiac, asked whether the Council can get the message to7all of the residents about the MAC telephone number to contact on complaints. Mayor Mertensotto suggested that anyone wishing to do so should write to Mr. Hal Greenwood, Chairman of the Metropolitan Airports Commission, explaining the problems and expressing their complaints. The Council answered questions from the audience and discussed the position the City should take with regard to the aircraft flight corridor. It was the consensus of Council that staff be directed to prepare a resolution incorporating the following positions. On simultaneous take -offs, all flights departing 11L must maintain a runway heading until the end of the runway. Runway 11R maintain runway heading until middle marker. FAA should install marker on 11L; All planes will maintain assigned heading until they are 4 miles from the end of the runway or achieve 3000 feet above ground; On simultaneous departures, requiring 15 degree separation, planes departing 11L should be given a heading no more than 10 degrees north of extended CL and those departing runway 11R no further South than 5 degrees from extended runway CL; Once departing planes achieve 15 degree separation they must maintain the same heading for four miles or 3000 feet above ground; On non-simultaneious departures, there will be no turns from the runway centerline on runway 11L; Request that the FAA install a localizer on the east side of the Minnesota River for runway 11L; Oppose the Highland Park departures unless that departures are on runway centerline for a distance of four miles or 3,000 feet above the ground level; Procedure and compliance should be monitored by MAC with some annual reports to communities on effectiveness and Page No. 2324 April 19, 1988 procedure adopted should be subject to annual reconsideration. ABATEMENT Councilmember Cummins moved approval of an abatement for Frank and Doris Muehlegger for parcel number 27-03500- 020-01, reducing the assessed value to $2,840 for 1985, 1986 and 1987. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 FOTO MARK The Council acknowledged and discussed a letter from Foto Mark, Inc. requesting approval of a permit to construct a storage room addition onto their existing facility. Discussion on the matter had been continued from the last meeting. Mayor Mertensotto informed representatives of Foto Mark that one of Council's concerns in regard to the requested addition was over disposal of chemicals. He stated that under no circumstances does the City want those chemicals dumped into the City's sewer system. Mr. Phillip Litchfield, representative of Foto Mark, stated that the company has been operating its facility since 1974 and doubled its building size. He informed Council that his firm is an industrial printing company which has a containment facility, and that it is the containment facility to which they wish to add 900 square feet so that they can separate the storage of flammable liquids. Mr. Jim VanWinkel, also representative of Foto Mark, stated that the hazardous wastes generated go through a still that recycles and reuses the paint and that the material which is not reusable is transported to a hazardous waste facility in Wisconsin. He stated that his firm is licensed by the County and is inspected regularly by the State and the County. Mr. VanWinkel stated that no new chemicals or solvents will be generated as a result of the expansion, and that the facility is only being expanded to control the existing waste materials. After discussion, Councilmember Cummins moved to approve the issuance of the building permit for a 900 square foot addition to the Foto Mark building as requested. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 GEESE ROUNDUP Council acknowledged a letter from Garold Murphy, Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 2325 April 19, 1988 representative of Somerset Country Club, requesting that Council consider a resolution allowing the fish and nd wildlife department to roundup geese in Mendota Heights. Mr. Murphy, present for the discussion, explained the problems that Somerset Country Club is experiencing and the need for control of the goose population. Dr. Jim Cooper, Fish and Wild Life Service, was also present for the discussion. Dr. Cooper explained that in order to do any goose control, permits must be issued by the State and Federal agencies. He explained the role of his service in the control of the goose population and informed Council on the population growth over the past fifteen years, population which was at 1.,000 in 1973 and now exceeds 18,000 in the Metropolitan area. Dr. Cooper explained the capture and remove program for the Council recommending that removal occur every three years to keep the population in check. He stated that he is requesting Council's approval for the removal at the Country Club at the cost to Somerset, however he also explained that his service is locked in for this year's program and could not commence removal this year. Mr. Murphy stated that the Country Club is requesting Council's approval to get on the University of Minnesota's list so that hopefully there can be a roundup next year. Dr. Cooper and Mr. Murphy then answered questions from.the Council and the audience. After discussion, Councilmember Blesener moved to allow a three year roundup of geese within the confines of the Somerset Country Club under the University of Minnesota Fish and Wildlife Services Capture and Removal Program at no cost to the City and on the basis that an annual report be made to Council. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. The Council requested Mr. Murphy to provide the City with the description of the procedures the Wildlife service intends to follow in terms of the number of geese and locations from which they will have to remove the geese from before starting the program. CORNICK WATERMAIN The Council acknowledged a report and recommendation from the public works director relative to the installation of a watermain from Lexington Avenue southwest along TH 13 to service the Mike Cornick residence at 1176 Sibley Memorial Highway. Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolution No. 88-19, "RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 2326 April 19, 1988 FEASIBILITY REPORT TO SERVE 1176 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY AND ADJACENT AREAS." Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins was excused from the meeting at 10:00 o'clock P.M. I -35E Noise Wall Mr. Virgil McQuay was present to request that Council support his request to MnDot for construction of a noise wall by his home located at I -35E and TH 110. Mr. McQuay, 976 Kay Avenue, submitted a petition from 20 of his neighbors requesting noise wall construction. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 After brief discussion, Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of Resolution No. 88-20., "RESOLUTION REQUESTING MN DOT TO CONSTRUCT A NOISE WALL ALONG I -35E." Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins returned to the meeting at 10:05 o'clock P.M. PARK LANDSCAPING The Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works Director Danielson relative to request for proposals from park landscapers. Councilmember Blesener moved to authorize staff solicit proposals from landscape architects for preparation of a master plan for park landscaping. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CANVASSING BOARD Councilmember Hartmann moved that the referendum canvassing board be conducted on May 4th at 12:30 o'clock P.M. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ASSESSMENT ROLLS Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolution No. 88-21, "RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR LEXINGTON HEIGHTS HYDRANTS Page No. 2327 April 19, 1988 (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86-14), PARK PLACE (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86- 12), STRATFORD WOODS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86-13), ROLLING WOODS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86 PROJECT NO. 9), THE PONDS OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86 PROJECT NO. 9), WILLOW SPRINGS CREEK ALIGNMENT (IMPROVEMENT NO. 83 PROJECT NO. 6), NORTHLAND PLAZA (IMPROVEMENT NO. 85-3), COMMERCIAL STREET LIGHTS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86 PROJECT 11) ." Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MISCELLANEOUS Mr. Paul Springler asked Council whether there has been any proposal for apartment development on the Perkegwin Property. CITY HALL CATCH The Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works BASIN Director Danielson relative to the need for a catch basin for drainage in the City Hall parking lot. Councilmember Blesener stated that it is difficult for her to be convinced that a grading change for the parking lot will cost $5,396. Architect Bob Pierce, present for the discussion, stated that he is still investigating costs and would like to take another look at it. He stated that he can't believe that there is that much grading work required and asked that Council table the matter for the time being. CITY HALL CHANGE The Council acknowledged a report from City ORDER Administrator Frazell regarding a proposed change order for cedar shakes for a new city hall. City Hall Architect Pierce stated that last Tuesday it was brought to his attention by the City Hall sub- committee that there was some confusion as to what the Architects had specified for roofing materials for the new city hall. He stated that he consciously specified cedar shingles rather than cedar shakes, and explained the difference between the two materials. Councilmember Hartmann stated that the Council specifically directed the Architects to look at two buildings, the Strub building on Highway 13 and another off of Bush Lake Road, which the Council felt were good examples of what City Hall should look like. He pointed out that both of the structures have cedar shaked roofs, and that it is a real surprise to him that the City structure is proposed to have shingles and not shakes. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the entire Council is surprised. Page No. 2328 April 20, 1988 Mr. Pierce stated that he consciously specified cedar shingles because he believes shingles are more appropriate in what he is trying to achieve in appearance to the building. He stated that he believed that shingles would be a much better solution because it would give a trimmer less bulkier appearance than would the shakes. Councilmember Cummins stated that he is a very unhappy client, that he thinks the brick ugly, and now the roof is not as it was suppose to be. He stated that the City Council does not want a sleek municipal building and could not understand.how the Architects could possibly misconstrued cedar shakes as shingles. The entire Council agreed with Councilmember Cummins that all discussion was that there would be cedar shakes. Mr. Pierce stated the he believes the texture is the correct approach and that to change to cedar shakes would increase the contract by $4,800. He stated that he could find other ways to spend the $4,800 that would enhance the building more. Councilmember Blesener stated that perhaps the City received an exceptional shingle bid last fall, and that she feels very strongly that the City should not have to pay the $800 penalty for a problem it had no part in creating. Mr. Pierce stated that he will absorb $800 for goodwill, but that he still feels cedar shakes would be a bad decision. After discussion, Councilmember Cummins moved to authorize a change order in the city hall contract to allow an additional $3,876 expenditure for cedar shakes. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 COUNCIL COMMENTS It was the consensus that Paster Enterprises and the Planning Commission should be notified that the Council will anticipate major changes in the shopping center as part of consideration of conditional use permit for a liquor store. Councilmember Cummins pointed out that Bent Tree Lane is still not completed and asked that staff look into the matter and be sure that it gets completed soon. He also Page No. 2329 April 19, 1988 asked that staff look into the preparation of an ordinance prohibiting boats and floating devises in the Copperfield ponds. Councilmember Cummins asked whether the City could do anything about the faulty incinerator at the Mendota School and then directed staff to send a letter informing the school district that the City is aware of the problem. There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmember Hartmann moved that the meeting be adjourned. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:49 o'clock P.M. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON APRIL 19, 1988 Concrete Licenses: Hollenback & Nelson, Inc. M & N Construction Specialists Northland Concrete Construction Company Excavating Licenses: Bruhn Excavating - Carlson Sewer Company, Inc. Don Wayne Excavating James Peters Excavating Keystone Excavating Todora Plumbing General Contractor Licenses: Conway Construction, Inc. Dev. Con., Inc. Kraus Anderson Construction Company Twin City Storm Sash Quality Exteriors Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses: BSC Mechanical Contractors United Sheet Metal Page No. 2317 May 10, 1988 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meetig Held Tuesday, May 10, 1988 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins Hartmann and Witt. AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of the revised agenda for the meeting. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of the minutes of the May 4th Election Canvassing Board meeting. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Witt moved approval of the consent calendar, along with authorization for execution of all necessary documents contained therein. a. Acknowledgment of the Code Enforcement monthly report for April. b. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the April 26th Planning Commission meeting. c. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the April 12th Park Commission meeting. d. Acknowledgment of the resignation of Ken Noack from the Volunteer Fire Department. e. Approval of the permanent appointment of Kimberlee Blaeser as Secretary. Page No. 2318 May 10, 1988 f. Approval of the permanent appointment of Nancy Platz as Receptionist/Clerk- Typist. g. Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's monthly report for April. h. Approval of Partial Payment No. 4 to Doody Mechanical for $49,210.00 for work completed on City Hall. i. Approval of Partial Payment No.3 to Thomas Electric for $20,900.00 for work completed on City Hall. j. Approval of Partial Payment No. 6 to the Joseph Company for $141,403.70 for work completed on City Hall. k. Acknowledgment of a letter from the State Revenue Department regarding property valuation increases. 1. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated May 10, 1988 and attached hereto. m. Approval of the list of claims dated May 10, 1988 and totaling $123,652.21. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 BID AWARD Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of SIBELY HEIGHTS Resolution No. 88-22, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER AND STREET CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE SIBLEY HEIGHTS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO. 5)," awarding the contract to. Annandale Contracting, Inc. for its low bid of 125,595.16. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion_. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 There was brief discussion on the status of the Southeast Area bid award and the processing of the Centex Indirect Source Permit application. Page No. 2319 May 10, 1988 MARRIOTT LIQUOR Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for LICENSE RENEWAL the purpose of a public hearing on the Marriot Courtyard Hotel's application for renewal of its Limited Service Hotel On - Sale and Special Sunday On -Sale liquor licenses. Council briefly discussed a memo and recommendation from the City Clerk. Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and comments from the audience. CASE NO. 88-12, Councilmember Blesener moved approval of a STREBIG five foot sideyard setback variance at 1421 Clement to allow construction of a garage addition five feet from the side property line. There being no questions or comments, Councilmember Blesener moved that the hearing be closed. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilmember Cummins moved to approve the renewal of on -sale limited service hotel and Special Sunday on -sale liquor licenses for the Courtyard by Marriott Hotel. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 88-08, Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of EAGLE RIDGE SUMMIT the preliminary plat for the replatting of Lots 10 and 11 of the Eagle Ridge Summit Second Addition as submitted by Jesco, Inc. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 88-10, HOWE Councilmember Cummins moved approval of a 6.5 foot sideyard setback variance to allow construction of an addition at 539 Hiawatha Avenue 3.5 feet from the west property line. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 88-12, Councilmember Blesener moved approval of a STREBIG five foot sideyard setback variance at 1421 Clement to allow construction of a garage addition five feet from the side property line. Page No. 2320 May 10, 1988 Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 88-14 Councilmember Blesener moved approval of SCHAEFER wetlands permit to allow construction of a new home on Lot 3, Block 1, Spring Creek Acres, 75 feet from the wetlands area. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CASE NO. -88-16, KILEY Mr. Scott Kiley was present to request approval of a 15 foot front yard setback variance to allow construction of a detached garage 15 feet from the front property line at 716 Spring Creek Circle. Councilmember Blesener stated that she opposes the variance. Councilmember Witt stated that she can appreciate the problem with Dodd Road and that she has seen the plantings that have been installed and has no concern. Councilmember Cummins stated that he could agree if the variance is reduced to ten feet and if two additional fifteen - foot pine trees of a similar variety as those already on the property are planted. He stated that he is concerned that Mr. Kiley should immediately put in a good screen along Dodd. Mr. Kiley stated that he has had a contractor install about $1500 worth of plantings along Dodd and that the garage will not sit up as high as it may appear. He agreed to install to additional ten to fifteen foot trees. Councilmember Cummins moved to grant a 10 foot variance from the front yard setback at 716 Spring Creek Circle with the proviso that the applicant plant two additional large trees consistent with the existing planting on the property to screen the garage from Dodd Road. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 1 Blesener Page No. 2321 May 10, 1988 AIRCRAFT NOISE Council acknowledged and discussed a proposed resolution on the City's position on the aircraft flight corridor. It was the consensus that items 1 and 2 be renumbered as 1a and 1b and that "centerline" be inserted before "runway" in the second line of item 1. Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of Resolution No. 88-24, "RESOLUTION CONCERNING MENDOTA HEIGHTS/EAGAN AIRCRAFT FLIGHT CORRIDOR," with corrections. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 LICENSING The Council acknowledged and briefly discussed a memo and proposed amendment to the contractor licensing ordinance. Staff was directed to further research the recommended limits on property damage. HEARING -- CASE NO. Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for 88-13 PASTER ENTER- the purpose of a public hearing on an PRISES application for conditional use permit for a liquor store in the Mendota Plaza. Mr. Edward Paster and Mr. Gerald Frisch, representing Paster Enterprises, were present for the discussion. Mr. Frisch distributed a letter from Paster expressing the intent of the firm to renovate the existing 55,000 square foot facility and to add Phase 2, 45,000 square feet. Mayor Mertensotto stated that he understands that Mr. Paster is talking about changing the front of the center and creating individual store fronts, etc. Mr. Paster responded that he intends to create a boutique, upscale appearance, that Snyders will be left as it is on the exterior and that the interior will be remodeled. He stated that he has a contract with MGM Liquors, a lease agreement in which Paster Enterprises has obligated itself to remodel the shopping center as planned for Phase I within 12 Page No. 2322 May 10, 1988 months. He stated that he intends to remove the existing pylon and replace both it and the pylon at the Dodd Road entrance. With respect to Phase 2, Mr. Paster indicated that after a grocer is in place and he -has a firm commitment from a soft goods firm, Phase 2 will commence. Mr. Ron Krank, architect for the project, stated that the center was built in 1970 and has had very little upgrading since. He informed Council that Paster hired his firm about a year and a half ago to study the center and come up with enhancements. He explained that Phase I will include removing the existing enclosure and showed Council a pallette of materials and colors which will be used in the renovation. He also discussed landscaping which will be installed to enhance the appearance of the building. Responding to Councilmember Hartmann, Mr. Krank stated that either u -shaped or 1 - shaped enclosures will be installed to screen the'five large rooftop mechanical units. Councilmember Blesener noted that one of Paster's sketches shows the extension of South Plaza across T.H. 110 and asked whether Phase 2 is contingent upon the extension. Mr. Paster stated that he would like to see the extension made but the plan is not contingent on it. He pointed out that he is a resident of the community and is interested in the appearance of the center, and that he is ready, willing and able to correct the problems. He stated that he is categorically and emphatically going to do the remodeling within 12 months and that he would be willing to provide whatever assurance the City would wish, such as a letter of credit, to prove that the remodeling will occur within 12 months. Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and comments from the audience. Page No. 2323 May 10, 1988 There being no questions or comments, Councilmember Hartmann moved that the hearing be closed at 8:43 P.M. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that there is an application pending from MGM Liquors which is a separate matter requiring hearing. Councilmember Blesener stated that she feels the design needs to go back to the Planning Commission. Administrator Frazell stated that because of the potential size of the project, it should be done as a PUD and that the hearing this evening is to determine whether the City is willing to issue a conditional use permit for a liquor store before the renovation is completed. Councilmember Cummins suggested that a decision be delayed for at least a week so that legal counsel for Paster can develop a letter of intent and so that the City Attorney can study the lease agreement between Paster and MGM and explore options to provide the maximum assurance that the project will go forward. Mr. Paster stated that his goal is to get the tenant in place and that he is willing to give any assurances the City would like that he will perform the renovation. He felt that a PUD process is not necessary for the Phase I remodeling. Staff was directed to do more research on whether a PUD is necessary. After discusison, Councilmember Blesener moved that the matter be continued to May 17th. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 88-11, Mr. Dale Glowa, from Northland Land Page No. 2324 May 10, 1988 NORTHLAND LAND was present to request approval of the preliminary plat for the Mendota Heights Busienss Park Addition (former MAC property) located at Pilot Knob Road and Lemay Avenue. Mr. Glowa briefly reviewed the plat consisting of 12 industrial lots. He stated that it is planned that the plat be handled on an outlot basis to be parceled out as property is sold. He stated that plan has been adjusted to increase the Lemay Court right-of-way to 80 feet as was requested by the City. Mr. Glowa then answered questions and comments from the Council. Councilmember Blesener moved approval of the preliminary plat of the Mendota Heights Business Park Addition. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 VICTORIA HIGHLANDS The Council acknowledged and briefly discussed the plans and specifications for improvements to serve the Victoria Highlands plat. Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of Resolution No. 88-25, "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE VICTORIA HIGHLANDS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO. 7)," bids to be received on June 2nd. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 DOG ORDINANCE Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Ordinance No. 256, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1301, 'AN ORDINANCE REGULATING DOGS AND CATS, PROVIDING FOR THE LICENSING OF DOGS AND CATS AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF." Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 FINANCING Council acknowleged and discussed a report and recommendation from the City Treasurer regarding financing. Page No. 2325 May 10, 1988 Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolution No. 88-26, "RESOLUTION CALLING FOR REDEMPTION OF OUTSTANDING $1,350,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1982 AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC SALE OF $2,525,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1988," the sale to be conducted on June 21st. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 IVY CREEK It was the consensus of Council that an informal hearing be conducted at 7:00 -� p.m. to discuss Ivy Creek improvements with affected property owners. CORNICK WATERMAIN Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolution No. 88-27, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEERS REPORT AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED WATER EXTENSION IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE 1176 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO. 6)," the hearing to be held on June 7th. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CAR WASH REQUEST Mr. Brian Birch was present requesting that Council give him an informal reading on their sentiment for rezoning his property at Dodd Road and Freeway Road so that he can construct a car wash. Mr. Birch reviewed his proposal He stated that his property is zoned B-2 and that he believes a car wash is a permitted use in B-2 districts as he interprets the Zoning Ordinance and based on jurisprudence citations. He pointed out that the majority of the uses surrounding his property are non-residential and that he keeps the interest of the City uppermost in his mind. He stated that he believes the facility would provide a good service and would be a good looking facility . He felt that the Planning Commission is biased because of the City Planner's reasoning. Mayor Mertensotto stated that Mr. Birch is here to get direction in which way to Page No. 2326 May 10, 1988 go before he files an application. He further noted that Mr. Birch seems to have some question of whether this is a permitted or conditional use in the B-2 district and that this is a question the Council cannot answer this evening since Council does not have sufficient background to make this determination. Mayor Mertensotto suggested that the matter be tabled pending receipt of a staff report on whether the use is permitted in B-2 Districts. Administrator Frazell stated that B-2 is neighborhood commercial and B-3 is general commercial, and that car washes are currently permitted uses only in B-4 districts. He suggested that there are three options: Council can entertain an application to allow car washes in B-2 districts; rezone the property to Brij; rezone to B-3 and amend the ordina to allow car washes in B-3 districts. He pointed out that a car wash is clearly not an allowed use in B-2 districts. Staff was to prepare a clarification for discussion at the May 17th meeting on whether the zoning is proper. CITY HALL City Hall interior design consultant Suzanne Ilten was present to review the color pallette and proposed furniture layout for new City Hall. She stated that the layout represents the total master plan for the facility and would cost approximately $150,000. Administrator Frazell stated that the City Hall subcommittee is meeting weekly and will prioritize the furnishing purchase plan. Several Council members indicated that the woodtone is to dark and that the wook on the ceiling in the Council chambers should be more of a natural tone rather than white. LOGO Council acknowledged a memo from the City Administrator regarding proposals received from two City residents for preparation of a City logo. Staff was directed to request a formal proposal Page No. 2327 May 10, 1988 from Ms. Huspek and that both proposals will be given consideration. PARK REFERENDUM Council acknowledged and discussed a report from the City Administrator regarding the park bond referendum and Centex Developer's Agreement on purchase of Southeast Area park property. After discussion, it was Council consensus that the matter be discussed at the joint workshop to be held on June 4th and placed on the June 7th regular meeting agenda. SYNAGOGUE Mayor Mertensotto informed Council that he has received a request from Beth Jacob that the City place an ad in its bulletin. He stated that while it would be inappropriate for the City to contribute anything for advertising, individual Council members would perhaps like to contribute something. After discussion, Administrator Frazell was directed•to respond that the City cannot expend public funds to participate but would be happy to send a letter of welcome to the congregation. CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS Council discussed the police contract negotiations and gave direction to the City Administrator. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmember Hartmann moved that the meeting be adjourned. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:48 P.M. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON MAY 10, 1988 Blacktopping License: Lino Lakes Blacktop, Inc. Concrete Licenses: Manor * Concrete Construction, Inc. Neuharth Company, Inc. Walrich Cement Corporation Excavating Licenses: Dasen Contracting Jeanettas Excavating Murr Plumbing,,Inc. Turner Excavating Company General Contractor Licenses: All-American Recreation, Inc. Card Construction Company Construction Specialists Dahlstrom Designer Homes Dolphin Pool & Spa Eagan Pool & Spa Forest Homes & Mfg., Inc. JHL Construction Lawrence J. Scott Roofing & siding Lifestyle Homes, Inc. Mark Johnson Construction, Inc. Midwest Fence Nature Homes, Inc. Reuter Construction, Inc. Rodan Custom Services, Inc. Sawyer's Construction Selby Ornamental Iron Company Sonnen Bros. Construction, Inc. T.D. Construction W.F. Bauer Construction Company Wieber Construction Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses: Hastings Heating Sylvander Heating, Inc. Plastering/Stucco License: Donelly Stucco tHEND015 HEIGHIS F iRE DEPARTMESIF APRIL 1988 MONTHILIV REPORT FI'F C,",LLS NO. -05-: 7. 1. _ =-030 i° UI,IEIER OF CALLS 23 ALAMIS DISPATCHED: NUMBER STRUCTURE CONTENTS MY_ TOTALS TO DATE € Ol11.1ERRAL #'O PEADENTIAL 163000 VEHICLE FIRES - WOO $6100 CONT PACT FIRE=S (ALL) $11:000 RESCUE 1 $0 $0 WOO I EVI€_ALA._SI==TS 1 11011THLY LOSS TOTALS MENDOTA HEIGHTS GFl, 'el 55,BPUI-::H .• I;O v" U. F_ 12 ALL Fl RES, ALL AREA== $2200 HAZAPC'OUS' =ITLATI€ir; 2 tlEND. HTS. ONLY STRUCT/CONTENTS $63,000 FJ5E ALARt 1 CRI1.11:r�L MEND. HTS. ONLY I'14='C:ELLANEC€LI_ FA'_':,E A HW - I-01iG lEr_,_!NL 1 I.1END. HTS. TOTAL LOSS TO DATE '69,600 UPE ALAC'I 1 - F'EN DEW E BILLING FOR SERV ICES D WENT I AGENCY THISMONTH TO DATE OTHER 1 TOTAL CALLS 23 MN/DOT :z:€=€ I'll LAI RP $0 LOCATION OF FIRE ALARMS: TO DATE LAST YEAR `NP RR io OTHERS: 1 :ENDOTA HEIGHTS I ,= 64 75 Sco Lbe MEt' DOTA 1 3 1 TOTALS: $547 $54 '=:€€NFI_+H LAKE 0 6 FIRE MARSHAL'S TIME FOR MONTH LIL DALE 2 10 .; I1'1_tPEMON' 16 OTHER 2 3 3 111}r EST€GATII N'= O TOTt�L 23 80 CSO R;E-I1,1`•F.ECTII_€t' i€ WORK PERFORMED I-OLIP'S TO DATE LAST YEAR FIRE CALL5 49?5 1 sW5 i 9l o 110ETINGS,62 52 226 AC'+I"111dISTRr TIO11 7 DRILL; _ r,0 .,tn 5 354 EEKL'r CLEHI 1 -IIF r==. - - -�_�: �� ........................... �, �F �F'EC'Inl � F'0.. C•T.-, 9 F'ECIAL ACTIVITY 101) 516 114 AM 11NISTA I E 144 536 474 TOTAL 62 HRE 1AR3HAL 62 25=.5 248.5 _ TOTAL:10063 395�?.5= 5=4885 REMARKS: SEE OTHER SI DE FOR !__;YI�IOF'_;IS ::FIRE DEPARTMERT MONTHLY YORK PERFORMARCE FOR APRIL 1380 .................. ..... -............ .,,... ................... .............» ........... .................... .-..... .................. ....... ..... .. ....»........... ..... ... .......; ........ ....... ................ N. _............ ... ... .. .. .. »....... ............. .................. �.. ^.. CALL ,FOP, MONTH i . FIRE FIRE = PERCENT CLEAN MONTt!LY SEN OFFlU1=R RESCUE ROOK!E 8P£CIAI° ...................... ...............................................4...................:..........................4.......................................... •r .. ........................................s... ......»........r......... .. . ..... �a CALLS :CALLS :ATTENDED€ ` UP DRILL MTG: MTG DRILL DRILL ACT. ................... ..,. I ...................4........... -- ... .... :...... .......... ................ ..- ....... ... .............-.,... ... ..-.. ......... ......... ...... ..» . ...»... ...... .AR TO GATE I ATT'D ATT'D THIS L -.q.. 2 1 2 4 :ADM ...... ... ......:.;..................... p......................,......... .. ....»J.'........ .............................. n.....`.... i ...... ....... ....... .........;.,....... ...,.,...; ..... , ................ $0 MONTIt ;YEAR '• YEAR ::HOURS: HOURS :!Ills.; HOWS HOURS H01,IRS WOWS IIR i� ................ ............................ .q.�..,... .. ........................q............................;.y....... .......».}....,............, ......... .. ........ ...:.. .. .. .. ,...... .... .. .. .. ... ,. ci i i F ��nrt t�i � L o ............_:........ ..._.... »�G�........;._ .......... «......G............;.....`...;.....................;......•.................................. ': r+�... 'c..... 4............�...... .................. ..... ... .................... -.'.� Bill Let _ 10 31 3..:*, »6 2 2 4 41 ............................... ....................... ................. ...». ,... ..... ..p.i................. ...._.................. �......`._............ .........i..................... .............»........r......... ....... ... ....»».»_.....».....»....,. ....+' ....... .... ...................... «.».. ....... .. ...... ............. ..........................»_........... .......»......... ................ .....».� EA1,T. Keith Stern 15 40 1 LnL 2 .............................................:.a........................................ .. .... Paul Dreelan € 12 36 49 € 2 2 z a MileCoonan .................,..........�..................T�..... ......bb:r ._.:.:.................. ;................. ..t.. ...I............. .................. ..................... ... ......... ................. :.;.......................; .., .. , ..... ....... .............. .: ............ .................... .. ... ................. ...................; .................... .............................. • Gordo Skjerven......-_... �...... ....4?..... ` .. �'.. ..... . *.- ` .................. ...... ................. ......`........ ........i Ed Adrian € 15 4A .q .......................q....... `........ 60,3Z ..........; ' ............ ........L......... ........ ................. .................... q.......................j.. ................. I Fit.I:n?�aht....:.............. 15 Ori 50?r; 4 2 `t.... ».I Jim Ferron............. t.�....... �..... ...... .....�..... ................... .............. ........... . . 45 ................. ....................j......... ... ........ ..... ......r.j................•.............»........P............................. ....................»..y...........`........... ............................... n 7 r, n Ken WeisenEvrr�er 11 ,5 44 4 2 �................... .........I.......... .................... ..q ...... ......,... ..... ...r..... ........ ......................., ....... us02pCCP..... r ................. .... ..... ................ ......................4.......................................... ......Ci1 .. Ehisler g ; 10 51 = 64`-� 2 Marc Cannoittl.............q.:.......................k�..............�i...�.............t.......;..........._........ ..... ............... ................. .................. ........-........... � • .. q.� ....... _ : .................. �'...p......................j................»» ...................p.................. .. •John Neska,.............. .;........:........14:: ...4�.... 54,?X .. 2. 2. t SteveCari_cn.......... .............................�.....,.;.........24 .....;.......2...................................t.. ............... ................. .................. ....................... ;.......................a.. ........a.; ............,...............s...............................,;......................................... ;....... ................... ..... Dior Zwirn............... D. .... 4 �.. L. ..� LUV ta................... .............1... ...3n......q........45 ..... ....`........................... ....... ............................................... ........�,..... .............,....fi........ .......... ....................... .................... ..tA ... ............. ,....»... .................. ............._.....�...... ........<...,,.............. ......� -like Marscuil"......_. `-'. ;0 o.. .Z.. z. .c. L .. p.: .........,._....,........ .......................:,.y....»...........r...................... .................................. ................. .................. ................. ....... i «»..............»»....'. {.......................� ......................... ..................................... .................................I.......... ................. ................ CAPT. Jeff Stenhaua : 1 1: 42 : 5?' 4 2 _t4 LereylJoack....._....,... ..........I............ ..._f ^.......P.............;;'..... q......2......q.............».... .................................y....... .......-.-....... .......4....... ..............._.......... ........... ._........... ................. .4........... .....«.6......................... ,. ., ...............................,. ....... ......»....,..... ................ .... .............. .... ,. .. .. ..y'......�.. George Noack Sr. @: 15 46 5° ^' 2 2 2 Larr,bert Der1 ....._... ..........._..1.'., ..-.J�_..........,._ c ...... 2.......*..................... ................. ................. ................,. .................»........... ._g.......... ..r... ....... .............1Gi..__..`.... .....0 .............. ..[ .....`..... ........i.............. j..................... ;...................... r................ ..... .......�....... ..... E C-m-r_ e No 3c k Jr. ! TamOlund ........ __......................j......... ......p............... ................. .................. .............,.. # <. ............ ...... ......................�.. j MiteMaczl:o............. ...............2�, .....�.'... ......'..�.�...... � �. _ ................,. ................ ...., �....... ..... + DanBarratt............... ».................1.1. ....25......q....... =e...........,.......6..... . ....................... ................. ............................................ I........... .......� .............. .......................�.�............... ..4.............................. .. ............................................... ...... ........ ........ ........... ... -...». . ... ................. ....... .......... ...... .... ......... ............. ................... .� Aaron Coates 18: E-3 7o.-t,' � � .... .. .... ..............;.' ....-..,........ -............. ........'............... '.v.........,..... .............. .. ........................................................................ ...... ..........P ...... 1 CAPT. Jamie Lerbs..q.................j.S .....4i.,. ......... .................. .......... .... .......... .... ........................... 2 71 I................_.............)............,...............t.................................... ................. .I............... .................. ..................... .... ...Tomheinzettel$1� ,....................n,.......«. .....��....... . . ............ ............................................s......................;.. ...... .. .... en f��ck.�f .. ....................«.. I • q...........................................................................:.;.....................................................:.......................:.......................:,....._................:.,....................n..,....... Jof fn Lapakl o ;: 20: 21 26% ; '• 2 i 2 I s 2 i 4 ............................................... . ........ J.................................................0.:..................:.........................4..........................................................a.......................4............... .. ...... Jim Kilburg t3 44 55'-A 2 € 2 a + P,ands...Mcf'hm.arc......4.:...............1.;.........Z......r...........1.�......;................;................... ................. .........._..... .................. 1....... i i..............................e......................� .............. ............ . ;. ..............:.... ErickSchmidt s = � 37 4F� .................. ...�... .................. ..._............ ..,»_............ ................ ......� ................ ...................4- ... .....................;...................q.............. .;...........,...................... ...... .........---.... ...... Y,e�rin Per 7` ,32 40?5.... 2 2 . t..................... .................. t 1 i ........................................... [.e-................... ..ij... n. ..................j.: ............ ......................... .........q......................;.................... ........ ........ ....... ..... .. ,.... ."� »............ ....«...................... -..;............................................... i.................... ................................. ... ................ ........................................ ...................;........ TOT�►L ATTENDED 32 2'3 26 5 5 6 ' .................»«...........................�......«... , . ... ...............p ... ...... ................... ........;.......,_..»...;...................s......, ......... ...... ..... ..... ... ...- .. ,.. ..... TOTAL -1AN HOURS 64 S^ 52 1010 12 100 ..................«.........................4:.......................................................................... ................ i«............... «........... n.......... _........ ..w............................................. ....w:..................:........................•4•,..........4................... .................. .................. .................................. :THIS MONTH LAST MONTH BLAST. YEAR: i ;................ ....... ................. .......I.......... ..................t.........1 RUFISiMAhI.... 12.20 «......._....�,,.vXXI101);;, ", u, ,: f,N1X 1 _............................................................................ .... ...... �i .... ............ ,,?,,,,,... .................. .................. .6................ ................. ..... E. MEN/RUN i 18.57 i • 1..r 4; ....... 17 oz ................_........................... .................. ............................. 4....... ....-.-......--...... r:................. ;.................................... .....6........... ................. .................. ................. ...... A IE FOP YEAP, 49.07 47.47 48.36 ISQ I 83U PID. J_!ti _I: iii QLt 1E LI_t sabd!c- I{ _I fit IE! 111 aq 01 uajLIQAA OM pi_IP 4sQd at_I1 I_!L sn -Itlj `•[[i;:i pajE_laLlab •_G111 �1a_10 tt-{1 [1E:3 fil',j to L:atl_isa_i bUtuuc_,Idei-id ILJad:_ sum.. I[L-Jp ati'j_a_l tl1LIILIOtt I aLI1 ' j i_! a p t _t Li t UQ 0-1 j i_! i �[} f i[ t=rte a_! a l E• �t U S IDLt"Ib 0 Ln pie _Jajjay 0.1 Lied _IOCJJi PUQ -JUcjL10'3 bUlpjttiq _LII Llj!,k,% _I'_'LILLLIEI _ OL1_! a_Jrl @A% -_.aPLiib_lawd— O j ptiodsa_I W0. U@Lj , 10ti'l ii:_. =_E:ac_!E: LJOt 1 Dig -j0 -id 8_4L1 _lt10 'Lit s uitCt[tt•It-1 L{jL:`,?, S:_Jagt1_l8W Kt_!Ot[tt_UDIJ it}pa�l[ljFi @J0:=.L1=ttS:�a:_. 0 ad1"ij G aL{'1 1i{ 0H 1 IOPLI@'j Lii ullL_lilj-t�'1t111G`[j=.:(:��:� r�;(r ��I.!!' �'•p�,�tri[t� Lit jl!aLI_ij_t=:dE: PiiiI 5-! I1-1.ij Ati%aU GLI -1 bI_![_JtlUj jUab'=:� v,.. bL!tL![i='-?_t r►[1ijLi 1t.1J 6i -i1 WHIVN lll111NOW 'h jiD _11 -to Ulq jtrvt ht_if;dii_ oo bui jO_IadO a j�'s h_JaA G' Llaati '_GLI 41't'-'Jt `•OItj _inn o -I bLltp_IO',.'DV 'a jOt1_Ja_l [LIa1•1 a_Js JUal1_!t_JO_!L'',Lla _JO SUK`i1LJ al.{"1 0' _1@5LI 'p 0c., ca_ o fuoj1uogf3[ 0jQ1pGWLU1 LIE! LIPL{1 aJOW j: 8JJQ 01 PLIQL{ f.lO SIO-I[WOLJO lit 1al jl jL1Qnb jLJaL_tj jjilS IOU 8_14' a_taL{ j '_J@A@1',:%OH :-.no_JaCil.?ep a_JG' `L?i,L'; ILII ja[:t I h 1E'LIj q o 1 aqj0' sIE!jLLLIagD m,aj B h1LIEI a_!6' a_18i_{1 jLI8L1.Ji_l13_1L1"t_lo aLi1 0-1 rJG',Y, rl LJ Q LI t I ti j U_I_i LI -IOU a_10 j 50 j:.j G i_I E: _? a t[ 6 L,_ S _Jit s_la i_l t e} I_l a _I LI O[[ E: D S U! &,,P a 1 i i_IO pUnUj `IQ'atlt_J@Li.D [IV 'djl'=. LJO jQoiwai-{-' _iEgnJtj_ied e 1o! ebt?_i�cj5 :j[Ctq ab_jej iti_1 �i a_!JLli 1j.Dt_1P0_Id bUtUP810 joi-j-1°snpui 10 jLl8iJ.id,3jar'1ap pi1E _10j ajtt[:_.Ljtid:..a_i a_lG .1LltilaH E:jOpI_Jal..j I_I[ pa t10LI :_•CiUtp[ttlq yG[i..DJ al -{1 �a-1c.lI apt -a O SH ':.lilaj,jit_!d 10juJ ,ijIUO_lir,LIa-10 Ll11e8Ll IEIa_J 0U aj>_'a-J_I 0j 11)0 pa1II11-t p:�;',10$,,1uI I E: J t w a l{' a 111 i_J t E:a p 0 i_{ 1 U IV'.O p i_{:=.1111 O j %j U ':, S Iii, j t 1. G' I_i 1 t_i d Li i 11.1_1= i= p I:• E• jt c:aI:JLIabo ar.,Og! aL{1 LI1t,t•', LJOLTE itt1OL10 , _lajlti jt_IaU.JLIO_ltr,t?� pl?t` LI j jQ@LJ, 0-1 C,p_JEcr_'LI aU i.W_la j8p 0-1 j [0-1ILIO._! IJO-_ LO j rla:;Li_ Pe j ALIO _i l_l Ill_ E j _I L171 tlr-. Iou se E!" I t .. ! ti ft_ U E: I Ia Q L i SOA!" Oi_ a� I _ ;',�, j:� 1.i�J ��1-lL-� t lt.�:i _J _Jt �.,.JtE j I�: cr.� j { j 0.1 p01_lLL1_I_laj8p a•I',4„ ID-OLU_IaLIO aLlj gEgo-.D3 jam' _:jOtU_l@q' 1 aJ_{1 '1111:. 11 ,t':l1'AIO—t Lll PLIC' jtiaw-1-iE'dap -ino fiq L1OitPf,1jS `',l.It I_lOd ' .at_Jiij_!_ltll{;( all -t. O @1_110 UI jj!d'3 jE:.D1W9Lj3 0 rlq paddL_11 :_E:Ak W-1011 OLID jC'f.{j paa-lr'•,pE: jL!-L1.1-1 J0110P Oi{j _!a jji, @oL[od fS_iij aq-1 jtJ Licidw -fl e1;s.L{Ot1i IG1_1itL:_la[j :ii_lj qq!i,, '3 10, LkUQtS a_!tj 0 i� j papUOd:sa_i juawj_iodap ? SI_I I 1C' S I IL_ld+Y LII ^•-uIq aL]j 10-1ILIo.3 dlai_j Oj-laj.dtl_tajaq E! [i_IO_11 Ja jS11, jO Sdii_ip 1E!tJa>s' OA -'s-1 apG'LU ri::,[0' ; 1,JG 8Jl.{1 fire Oj ar;E:AP-_, wo-ij pau_lrlq O'Llj 8-111 @L{j ji Dt1 cq pa(-tL,odc,a_J 1Ljaw1-1 6. p _inn pUe dPj1] aLlj `aj[Lr,SLUI-I13 'ri911F.' •, aid' -JV 'Llubc,] u_i t_ij �rS;tia_l_I '-suiUjloq AA OLjj UL butLJ_ltlq c, P,m IOL{1 a_ltj Q [0_JjLIC, :3 !I1 L QP3 0+ i1E:'t p[E LE:t"llilll_J G' SG1AA. L{:j[LjA% JO 8A1StiajX@ ISOU.! aLjl 11 jLlEli;_! aL1 j EiUt-R-1p SSO-113 r• 1-ji-to _iol ajgt;.UOd a_i SPA _!aL{' j5ahk ti_Ip flJOU_!a_J j ;a alj j `Rjil :LE!_lb CRII jLlt+Ll juads soi,% L{ ji_IOW aL{ j -401 aWtj _11-10 O 1 011 'Cjcj..•,_: 0-1 pa,+,UrIOU_IP. 1PLjj Sa_ili a[.ttllaF, a_iaA?. L1:31LI1.1, j0 LIjoq fij_iadl]_Jd Oj attEtL1.JE'•p Ut pajjti ,a_i a•[[0''D, a:saL{1 j0 O1'•r11_ 'f.I11_iow aLI1 bUt_inp 01 paPLIod=.a_1 ap 6_it1 8Lll SHAH flHiNOW 310 S I SdONA' 10;?fi SPECIAL TRAINING Twenty seven members of the department completed a four" hour cour?e in hazardous materials at,%,arene•ss that was taught by certified Vo -Tech instructors. The course is required by OSHA for all Emergency First Responders This course was provided free of charge to our department ,and all departments in Minnesota through a Federal grant to provide such training Additional training requirei-nents are also going to be Kopo ed by OSHA. As of the first of the year OSHA requires 24 hours of Hazardous HateriNs traitAng per gear. We .are taking step•; to meet these re re s CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 11, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Mendota Interchange Project Job No. 8310 nTQrllqqTnm. Attached is a notice from Mn/DOT informing the City that the signal lights located at the end of the Mendota Bridge will be replaced this summer (the existing one has structural problems). Upon receiving this letter, our interest was piqued as to the status of the Mendota Interchange Project. We wondered if the new three cent gas tax passage might now provide funding for our favorite project. Dick Elasky, Assistant District 9 Engineer, reported that Phase I (Trunk Highway 13 relocation) is now projected to be let in the fall of 1990. V Minnesota Department of Transportation District 9 3485 Hadley Avenue North Oakdale, Minnesota 55109 Telephone 779-1178 Mr. J|rn Danielson Public Works Director 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 5512O Dear Mr. Danielson: SUBJECT: S.P. 1901-103 Trunk Highway 13otTrunk Highway 55 |nMendota Heights, Minnesota Traffic Signal Installation We have a project currently scheduled for m June 34, 1988 letting that will revise the existing traffic o|Qno| system at Trunk Highway 13 and Trunk Highway 55 in Mendota Heights: The existing signal system will be completely replaced, including the conduit and uab|o. The new signal system will have double overheads for both Trunk H|oh+/oy 55 approaches, inorder to improve the visibility ofthe signal indications. The operation of this signal system will not be changed. ' The State will be responsible for all construction costs. monthly energy costs and will provide all maintenance. ' Please contact Mr. Bernie Arseneau at 779-1125 if you have any questions or comments. Sina rely, 11 j"54Z-'- L—'O-' (,�c Kermit K. McRae, P. District Engineer AmEqual Opportunity Employer LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON MAY 17, 1988 Asphalt/Blacktopping License: Asphalt Specialties company Excavating Licenses: Kuehn Excavating Rose Sewer St. Paul Utilities, Inc. Gas Piping License: Ferraro Heating, Inc. General Contractors Licenses: City Wide Insulation, Inc. Crowley Company, Inc. Curran V. Nielsen Company, Inc. Home Lumber Company Jim Stevens Construction, Inc. Kirkland Construction, Inc. L -C Construction Company Parkos Construction Company, Inc. Remodeling Concepts Robbie Construction, Inc. Heating j Air Conditioning License: Modern Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. PlasterinqZStucco License: Classic Drywall, Inc. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 11, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Copperfield IV, Rezoning, Planned Unit Development, Preliminary Plat Case No. 88-09 nT1Q('TTQ0,Tr)M • At their April meeting the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the Copperfield IV proposal (see attached staff memos). There were a number of concerned residents at the hearing who generally expressed a desire to see the existing trees protected and for reducing the number of lots. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend the plat as prepared. Note: This parcel was part of the Southeast Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment and was indicated to be developed as proposed: R-1, PUD. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct a public hearing to consider the rezoning and the Conditional Use Permit for the Planned Unit Development and if Council desires to implement the Planning Commission recommendation they should pass a motion approving ORDINANCE NO. , approving the rezoning and pass a motion approving Resolution No. 88- , RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR COPPERFIELD IV. tovio ? CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CASE 88-09, COPPERFIELD IV WHEREAS, Copperfield East Associates have proposed a single family residential planned unit development project, in southeast Mendota Heights called Copperfield IV Addition; and WHEREAS, Copperfield IV is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Zoning Ordinance of the City of Mendota Heights. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, that a conditional use permit for a planned unit development be granted to Copperfield East Associates to allow the development of 1614bingle family homes as shown on drawings dated 2;:J,8=8$,.,.,. subject to the execution of a developers agreement of form and substance acceptable to the City. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota'Heights this 17th day of May, 1988. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 401 The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights ordains as follows: Section 1. Ordinance No. 401 known and referred to as the "Mendota Heights Zoning Ordinance" is hereby amended in the following respects: A. The following described property situated in the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota, is 11 here rezoned from an "R -IA" Rural ", Residential, as the case may be to an R_1 (L. 9, . Single Family Residential Planned Unit Development District, to -wit: All that part of Tract One, described below, lying North of Line A, described below: Tract One: Commencing at a point on the East line of Section 36, Township 28, Range 23, 330 feet South from the Northeast corner of said Section 36, thence North 89 degrees, 35 minutes West parallel to the North line of said Section 36, 800 feet; thence South parallel to said East line 594.2 feet; thence North 83 degrees, 19 minutes East, 805.5 feet to the East line of said Section 36; thence North 495 feet along said East line to the point of beginning, Except 33 feet thereof constituting a part of Delaware Avenue. Line A: Beginning at a point on the east line of the said Northeast Quarter distant 1813.0 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence Southwesterly to a point on the West line of said Northeast Quarter, distant 1483.0 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Northeast Quarter, subject to Delaware Avenue. containing 9.3 acres, more or less; Section 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Mendota Heights referred to and described in said Ordinance No. 401 as that certain map entitled "Zoning Map of Mendota Heights" shall not be published to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the City Clerk shall appropriately mark the said Zoning Map on file in the Clerk's office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this Ordinance, and all of the notations, references and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its publication according to law. Enacted and ordained into an Ordinance this 17th day of May, 1988. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk a CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Copperfield IV Case No. 88-09 nTqrTTqqTnM- April 20, 1988 Dick Putnam and his Copperfield partner, Lyman Lumber have now acquired the 9.3 acre Weed property located adjacent to their Copperfield Planned Unit Development.. -They desire to develop this property similar to Copper - field and call it Copperfield Phase IV (see attached memo from Dick Putnam and Steve Ryan). Engineering staff has reviewed the plan and offer the following comments: 1. The lot line between Lots 8 & 9, Block 1, should be pivoted to increase the frontage on Lot 8 by 10 feet (this decreasing it on Lot 9). This will allow for a better storm sewer alignment for extending a culvert that carries some drainage from Sunfish Lake under Delaware Avenue. 2. A grading plan with contours needs to be submitted. 3. An attempt should be made to flatten the 7% slope on Stone Road. 4. The Fire Chief desires to increase the watermain size to 8". 5. Their are two sheds on the site that will need to be removed. 6. This is not a Planned Unit Development so six variances to the minimum 100 foot frontages need to be considered: Lot 2, Block 1 - 10 ft. Lot 3, Block I - 10 ft. Lot 7, Block 1 - 10 ft. Lot 8, Block I - 20 ft. Lot 11, Block 1 - 3 ft. Lot 5, Block 2 - 5 ft. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct,a public hearing to consider the rezoning and subdivision requests and make a recommendation to the City Council. PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 26 April 1988 Copperfield East Associates West of Delaware, East of High Pointe Road (see sketch) Rezoning from R-1 to R-1 PUD and Approval of Preliminary Plat 1. This parcel is a 9.3 acre tract formally owned and occupied by Mr. and Mrs. George Weed. Mr. Weed was a distinguished Chairman of the Planning Commission in the early 1960s during the preparation of the City's first Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Weed passed on about a year ago, and his wife recently elected to sell the home to Mr. Putnam and his associates. As you will note from the attached sketch of the location, the Copperfield 1 and 2 Additions project rights-of-way to the west and south edge of the Weed property in anticipation of its ultimate development. 2. Attached is a copy of a statement prepared by Mr. Putnam outlining their proposal and a reduced copy of the development plan. You will note the location of the existing Weed house near the north central portion of the site. Providing access and frontage to the lot on which this house will remain is, of course, one of the key ingredients of the plat. The development pattern proposed appears to provide appropriate frontage for the lot and creates an additional sixteen lots with an average lot size of 20,115 square feet. Minimum lot size in this zoning district is 15,000 square feet. 3. Mr. Danielson and his Engineering Staff have reviewed the development proposal and find it in accordance with engineering requirements and appropriate for development from a grading and engineering standpoint. 4. A land owner one lot north of the intersection of High Pointe Road and Stone Road (on the east side of High 'Pointe Road, has contacted us expressing concern regarding the lot density of the proposed development, its traffic, and the retention of its trees: Firstly, with respect to density, you will note that there are five lots along the north side of the Weed property where the land is contiguous to the original Montgomery Addition which was developed with 40,000 square foot minimum lots. There are also five lots in the Montgomery Addition. The width of some of these lots in the Copperfield 4 Addition (along the rear lot line) vary from 168 feet to 228 feet. Therefore, the apparent visual density from the north side of the Copperfield 4 Addition is relatively low. Copperfield East Associates, Case No. 88-09 Page 2 5. The three lots in the northwesterly part of the Copperfield 4 Addition (Lots 1, 2, and 3 of Block 1) average 20,683 square feet. The square footage -of the lot owned by the person expressing concern is 189600 square feet. 6. With respect to the traffic, it would appear that the streets going in and out of the Weed property as proposed do not "go anywhere" and do not connect with Delaware Avenue. Therefore, under these conditions, traffic from this street system will be generated by the owners of the homes and certainly no thru-traffic is likely to take this circuitous route. It is true that persons entering the Weed property will have come from other parts of the • street system, which would include Copperfield Drive (off Huber or Delaware), or perhaps off of High Pointe Road. In any case, the amount of traffic involved is minimal compared to traffic generated on some of the streets in the remainder of the Copperfield Additions 1, 2 and 3. 7. With respect to the trees, the applicants have noted their intent to retain the mature trees to the maximum extent. The developers are certainly aware of the value of retaining these trees and have indicated on the proposed plat and PUD the location of the trees to be kept. The Planning Commission and Council may wish to question the applicant regarding the retention of any other trees on the site. Every good single-family plat developer is aware of the value of the retention of trees. This is particularly true in a quality neighborhood as has been developed and proposed in the Copperfield plat area. 8. If one were to purposely propose to reduce the density of this proposed plat, a balanced reduction would occur if one lot were taken out of the four lots to the west of the Weed property, one lot taken out of the six lots to the east of the Weed property, and one lot taken out of the six lots to the south. This would then produce an average lot size of 24,421 square feet, which is substantially larger than the average lots in the previous subdivisions in the neighborhood of which this is ,a part. We understand that the average lot size for the plat immediately to the west is reported to have been 21,725 square feet. 9. It would appear that the subdivision as proposed distributes the density rather well, considering the restrictions caused by the platting of the lots to serve the existing Weed structure. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING May 3, 1988 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Mendota Heights City Council will meet at 7:45 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, May 17, 1988, in the City Council Chambers, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, to consider an application from Copperfield East Associates for a rezoning from R -1A to R-1, PUD and a subdivision of the following described land: 9.3 acres of land located 330 feet south of Huber Drive and west of Delaware Avenue, previously owned by George and Alice Weed, all in the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 36, Township 28, Range 23, Dakota County, MN. This property is more commonly identified as 2245 Delaware. This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 301 and 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed rezoning and subdivision will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk Mendota Heights Police Department MEMORANDUM Date: March 22,1988 To: Mendota Heights Planning Commission From: Chief of Police Subject: Copperfield. Phase 4 I have reviewed the plans for Copperfield Phase 4, and have only two minor comments. They are also applicable to any of the new developments that are planned for the City. 1. Streets that change direction, like Stone Road, must continue with a logical house address sequence whenever possible. The small, North/South portion of Stone Road (primarily an East/West Street), is an example. Public Safety responders are conditioned to look for East/West addresses on streets that primarily run East and West. 2. Construction of a larger project often results in a certain number of thefts, acts of vandalism and injuries. Our responders need to know where the problems are and how to get there. As a result, we would appreciate it if the developer and/or City would install street signs and house numbers as soon as possible. An area as large Copperfield is difficult to navigate without them. We have been very pleased with the manner in which Copperfield has been developed. Any questions or problems have been quickly answered or resolved by the developer or the contractors. We appreciate the opportunity for input during the planning stages of such construction, especially as it relates to items such as street design and naming, lighting and access and egress. TO: Mayor and City Council of Mendota Heights and Planning and Zoning Commission of Mendota Heights DATE: March 15, 1988 FROM: Dick Putnam, Steve Ryan Copperfield East Associates RE: 4th phase of Copperfield, Mendota Heights Ladies and Gentlemen: It is a pleasure to be requesting your consideration of our Copperfield 4th Addition. The response by home buyers and builders has been very encouraging, so much so that we currently have 17 lots in the three phases unsold. The sales pace of the 13t, 2nd, and 3rd phases of Copperfield has created a demand for beginning Copperfield 4th Addition. The success of Copperfield gives us confidence in our design approach, marketing strategy, lot size and public improve design. We believe a continuation of the same approach and standards in the proposed 4th phase will complete the neighborhood as anticipated by the city, homeowners and builders. Requested Public Decisions Copperfield East Associates, a Minnesota partnership of R. A. Putnam and Associates, Inc. and Lyman Lumber Company, request that the City of Mendota Heights approve the following actions: 1. Rezone 9.3 acres from R -IA to R-1 PUD the same as Copperfield 1st, 2nd and 3rd Additions. 2. Approve the Preliminary Plat for Copperfield 4th Addition for 17 lots on 9.3 acres. Copperfield 4th Addition The planning of Copperfield 1st through 3rd Additions provided two streets connecting to the Weed property from Stone Road and Field Stone Drive. Also, sewer, water and storm sewer were provided to the site at Stone Road as requested by the Weed family. Copperfield 4th plan connects those streets with no connection to Delaware Avenue. The loop street will complete the Copperfield neighborhood and eliminate any potential through traffic. The street design is shaped to preserve the existing Weed home, and work with the existing mature hardwood trees on the site. The preliminary plat and grading plan illustrate the tree survey with the species and size indicated. The character of this addition of Copperfield is greatly influenced by our ability to save the major trees on the site. Our engineer will work with the staff to modify the grades to work with the city's public improvement standards yet protecting significant site trees. The lots along Delaware and those that border Montgomery Addition will have grading and site alteration restrictions as indicated on the grading plan to protect the existing pine and large oak, maple and elm trees that exist. Also, along Delaware, the second growth (thicket type trees) will be retained where possible to provide a good buffer with the existing street. We are currently negotiating with a builder to do extensive remodeling of the Weed home to make it compatible with the homes that would be built in Copperfield 4th Addition. This remodeling will be extensive and will retain the exterior character of the home, but completely redo the mechanical, electrical and interior space of the home. We believe it is important that if the home is to be retained, that it be brought up to current housing codes as well as the quality and appearance of the homes in Copperfield and those to be built in Copperfield's 4th Addition. The remodeling of the home seems more appropriate at this time than its destruction and rebuilding of a new house due to the location of existing Iarge oak and maple trees adjacent to the home. If remodeling is not practical, great care will be taken to remove the home and, thereby, maintain the large trees on the lot. Copperfield's 4th Addition will be included with the Copperfield 1st, 2nd and 3rd Additions for architecture review and any Copperfield neighborhood groups that may form. We are pleased that we were able to acquire the property at a point that Mrs. Weed needed to sell her family's homestead. We believe the plan presented will save the best of what exists and create a compatible neighborhood with Copperfield/ .Montgomery Addition and the Sunfish Lake area east of Delaware. The following lot standards are proposed for the Copperfield 4th Addition: Height Lot Area Lot Width Lot Depth Setbacks 2 Story 15,000 sq. ft. 90 feet 130 feet Front Side Rear Maximum Minimum at front Minimum 30ft. 10ft. 30ft. (3 on rear set back. Minimum walk -out basement). The only reduction in the normal R-1 standard is the lot width, which we propose to very from 90 to 118 feet measured at the building set back. The variety in lot width provides lots tailored to different home styles and creates an interesting street view. SITE AND LOT DATA Minimum/Maximum Lot Area 15,000 sq. ft. Average Lot Size Gross Site Area Proposed Street Area Net Buildable Area Gross Site Density Net Site Density 20,115 sq. ft. 9.3 Acres 1.45 Acres 7.85 Acres 1.83 Unit/Acre 2.17 Unit/Acre (Gross Minus Streets) We look forward to continued cooperation with everyone in the neighborhood, City staff and community officials to complete the Copperfield neighborhood. I MONTGOMERY ADDITION 1 , 5 4 3 ♦ \ \ BLK I I ( I \♦ `\`• ` \" \♦ 749 1J\ Ifi8 \ ♦ \ lift { 7 ! ` K)O�"•4 p 108228 \ \ \ \1 ` O 1 '`\ I /.. �"+` ( \ \ 1 1 t\ � � 7 _ /ter I rr` ! \ \ ` I \ 1 •1' L• I .t • i 1 +^.Y�"`� 3Y` \ \ 1 \ �` ` 9n., _ t / !t 1 ♦I yty t I 17 31 33 81. 4 3a\150\ \ \ e, N p '� �� \R 24r60D� -f•- 1 �}+ I mo; Nstn l y t4 I 2 'TtAVG I \ 1 j `^ Z \ ` ` ra• r'd ^ ' `�1 {1 1 d M i 1 \ 1- , \ \ 3, 0 � "j ��-�„- -,\ \♦ / ` ♦ y,. ^von,, . M1 I I -a 90 are^ I •bsl +I1 IM rr /!/ � />p ♦ � 19� � F8 �' !\` \ \ ` 1 ` tSE 1 � O � /•• .v ,•,,. � ti \ 'i {/! . 1 \ /X ♦ \ +T"LLM/ � Irer � a+ I 1 X11 Iltl lw Y y / / , . ` .-` sets • t t J I ' I 1 , cl �v. W m / \ 82 . �, ` \ `C�J..?8�� K i�,.,� I f ! �It,i �a t I ` \ �N F +! tii MALE — 1 / / 1 I I.1 ! i 2 'pi �^^ ` \ �^O ~ ` i. ,�.. rJ•T 7 / EM�AGg. ! t J ! I I:i fz P�� 1 Q � / / 15,900 \•� � -^, ••ti;-."' `.•,��a \ ;•````fir .. �j 7-`.•65. _ h \ �- f $74 ^^ I ` t/ i -1, \ ^ 5 - M1 G , ' ^ / /-,- _ �1. / Iml l l 'z to 150 ` �\ ` \ ♦ �--..._._�u �j--•'�^' r +, / r i 7- I I it (� -(D \n ♦ 'kn�`/j \ f TO \ `` ` / /'" ije/ .�-- /I er r r/ /i 1 1� M t , +..'ti - t lai Ex - E7L \• �• 1 ♦ Sp �- ,•• `{pg• \ 100 / . _. ,�r /, r/ r9 1, ,_, w 11 1 4 Lu I ' t. Q 16,000"i --.x.100 _.! �l:+II Q Ih T !j + / . . / S 1'c 4+ / 311Zt _ r I r 20,$00 / �.. 18.300 (�v 1 q 1 t 'c� j r // 10 16.400 :k+ ! 1 1 ' STONgROA_p/9 115 /j . u , / /9p i / ! w5.t > ! + ,,,/+ / ! .. , _ + /+ a ,_ � ^' ^y . n• ,. 9g'.� x � / / ' r B ^ V � w T p a + , ! / 7i � / + , .1.. � .' , \ ! 1- x I18 t w � Z br4 w,Zt / \23 \ w I m m au, : w s� 9/17 / /I 1 m\~ gtix v (t,� i h \� t z Z ,10 1 / / / Q• b I� 1 1 � 1 � J' w W o 116,100 61� / ; .^'i t / r / / / i _ , /+ 9f 4• ` 1 i } 1 i t t t 1 + ( + + w r / / t •,' ~} ~ ''� 0 t 2?r100 // a .., 19. Iti I ! I 1111 + + + +/ ++1941 t_ r�•\ ,- `" a8;1}OtY u u La t � ..+•' % �'•� M1'5 ��n„nJ•^.J\.^✓Y'�' 'L/"�ti _ ! / + EX �I � � 1 20 M1 BLK 2 CDPPEHFIELD 4_0t45E y1 EAD$,f __--7 I1 1 N -4TH ADDITION \� ` ♦' t\- NOUS£-PAOS_��.. ♦ \ ♦'� _ i; _�i TOTAL AREA 9.3. ACRES "`5 • ftl ; nem = ' ` j1 5 t ¢ PROPOSED STREET RIGHT OF WAY AREA 1.45 ACRES y' 3 t�t 4 l I 1 AREA IN PLATTED LOTS 341,950SF OR 785 ACRES `\ COPPERFIELD BLK 3 RD TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS 17 AVERAGE LOT AREA 2D,t15 SF GROSS SITE DENSITY L83 UNIT/ACRE NET SITE DENSITY 2.17 UNIT/ACRE „M NET BUILDABLE AREA 785 ACRES U) W Q U aQ m (nz� NR J Q W Z W& � J w W a CL O U NORTH _0 _z V �7 -J Q w Q Q U.w f a. 0 0 Applicant Name: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST F RI Case No. c'4 ' U 9 Date of Application 3-/ -7 - Fee Paid 4,5-S..s Initial - Address: & 0 /'/-IV/ -->.) Number & StreetU City State Zip Telephone Number: Owner Name: LasE First j� Initial Address: lvy�U �`� �t �1 C/�� /�U ez� pw�'� ��5�14'7/l Number & Strevet t City State Zip Street Location of Property in Question: %7� �_qIJO_IGt WC�Ve-- i�Jl,8:'- Legal Description of Property: Type of Request: Rezoning Variance Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for'P.U.D. Minor Conditional Use Permit _ Subdivision Approval 3 3 S Plan Approval Wetlands Permit Other Applicable City Ordinance Number„tt Section -) Present Zoning of Property:—tom I Present Use of Property: -oma;-zTPRGI' -- Proposed Zoning of Proper Proposed Use of Property: Number of people intended I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. 1—k gnature of Applicant �`%�►� /s Date Received by (title) NOTE: The following plans shall be drawn and attached to this application: A. Applications involving a Variance shall submit the following plans: Date Received Initial 1. Site Development Plan 2. Dimension Plan 3. Landscape Plan 4. Grading Plan B. Applications involving a Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit or Subdivision shall submit the following: 1. Sketch Plan 2. Abstractors Certificate (If the subdivision involves cutting of existing parcel into two or more lots). C. Applications involving a Wetlands Permit shall submit the following: 1. A full & adequate description of all phases of the operation &/or proposed physical changes. 2. A topographic map of the area. Contour intervals shall be drawn at two (2) foot intervals at a horizontal scale of 1” = 1,000' or larger. 3. A detailed site plan of the proposal showing proposed drainage, grading & landscz 4. A site design map showing the location of existing and future man-made features within the site and to a distance of five hundred (500) feet surrounding the site. 4. Title to the fee simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective daEe `hereof vested in: Alice S. Weed and George- H. Weed, wife and husband, as joint tenants 5. The lard referred to in this Ccmnitrent is described as follows: All that part of Tract one, described below, lying hbrth of Line A, descrii�-,d below: Tract One:. Cmuencirkj at a point on the East line of Section 36, Tc)amhip 28, Range 23, 330 feet South frau the Northeast corner of said Section 36, thence North 89 degrees, 35 n utes'.West �perallel to the North line of. said Section 36, 800 feet; thence South parallel to said East line 594.2 feet; thence North 83 degrees, 19 rrdnute.s East, 8055Mfeet to the East line of said Section 36; thence North 495 feet along said East Iire,�W,.6the,point of beginning, Except 33 feet. thereof constituting a part of Delaware Avenue. (Continued) Property Address: Vacant Land Mendota Heights, MN Issuing Agent Ior: Line A: 8kginning at; a point on the East line of said Northeast Quarter, distant 1813.0 feet .nth' ofsthe-Southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence Soutimesterly to a -point :7 West line of said Northeast Quarter, distant 1483.0 feet North of the ;Soutt corner of said Northeast Quarter, subject to Delaware Avenue. Records of Dakota oounty, Minnesota. Abstract Property t �``3!/J GL. NtN•��) eiiii^��P^*� f ✓� ,(.' DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT mEND{)TA PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the '1 day Of May, 1988 by and between the City of Mendota Heights, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter oal|ed the "City") and Paster Enterprises/ 2227 University Avenue, S%- Paul, Minnesota, (hereinafter called the "Deve|operx)- YY|TNESSETH T AT: WHEREAS, the Developer has made an application to the City for approval of a conditional Use permit to a||oVV an off sale liquor store(hereinafter called the "Liquor Store Conditional Use Permit") to be located in the Mendota Plaza Shopping Center, 750 Highway 110/ situated in Dakota County, State of K8)nnamoto' owned by the Developer and more fully described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter co||gd the "Shopping Center"); ' WHEREAS, the City desires for the Shopping Center to be improved, renovated and expanded; WHEREAS, the Developer warrants and represents to the City, as inducement to the City granting the Liquor Stora Conditional Use Permit and entering this Agreement, its intent to improve and renovate the Shopping Center. WHEREAS, the Liquor Store Conditional Use Permit was reviewed and approved, subject to certain conditions/ by City Council VO May 17/ 1988; and NOW,L THEREFORE in consideration of the City's approving the Liquor Store Conditional Use Permit, the Developer covenants and agrees to improve and renovate the Shopping Center subject tothe following conditions: 1. Phase i Renovation a. Developer agrees and covenants to improve and renovate that portion of the- Shopping Center, and the existing structures located thereon, as illustrated on Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof, and in conformance plans and specifications to be submitted to and approved by the City Council (hereinafter called the "Phase | Renovation"). b, Developer agrees and covenants that the Phase I Renovation shall include, but not be limited to, a new facade, metal canopy/sign and the painting and refurbishing of the north face of the existing supermarket, and the removal of the existing, glass -enclosed vva|hvvay/ in accordance with that letter dated May 9/ 1988/ from Edward JL Paster/ on behalf of the Developer, to the City; a copy of said letter is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit C (hereinafter called the "Developer's ---------- Letter"). c. Developer agrees and covenants that Phase | Renovation will be completed within 365 days of the date hereof. d, Developer og[ego and covenants to plant and maintain landscaping in accordance with Exhibit 8 and in conformity with the plans and specifications of the Phase I Renovation. 2. Design, Construction, Inspection and Warranty Related to Phase I Renovation a. The Developer acknowledges that Developer is familiar with the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance and City Subdivision Ordinance and ,_other applicable City codes and ordinances affecting the Phase I Renovation. The Developer acknowledges and agrees that all City approvals are' contingent upon among other things, the Phase I Renovation being in compliance with all applicable City ordinances and City code requirements. b. Developer agrees and covenants that prior to any construction that it shall comply with the requirements of all applicable City codes and ordinances, including but not limited to the preparation and submission of a D - final plans and specifications by a registered and the application for and receipt of a building permit issued by the City. c. Developer agrees and covenants to have a registered, pr_ofes�+errahcivil e.as,}~ submit to the City a sworn certificate of completion in the form of Exhibit D attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Certificate of Comp etion ), immediately upon full and final completion of the Phase I Renovation. d. Developer agrees and covenants th�tll improvements, renovations and landscaping shall be done in the and most workmanlike manner with quality materials and in strict compliance with the plans and specifications approved by the City. 3. Performance Assurance a. To secure performance of Developer's obligations hereunder, Developer agrees to deliver to the City Clerk a "Letter of Credit" issued by a recognized financial institution in the amount of Ten Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($10,000.00) in a form comparable to Exhibit E which is acceptable to the City and its legal counsel, in their sole discretion (hereinafter called the "Letter of Credit"). b. In the event Deve er fails to fully complete said itiTY improvements and renovations w4th+n c from the date hereof, the City may, at its sole option and discretion, present a draft for payment under the Letter of Credit. The Developer acknowledges and agrees that the Phase I Renovation shall be deemed to remain incomplete in the event that either (i) the City shall not have received the Certificate of Completion within one year of the date hereof, or (ii) the City otherwise reasonably determines after said date that the Phase I Renovation has not in fact been fully completed in accordance with the terms hereof. t 4. Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses The Developer agrees to pay all City fees required per city code or ordinance and further agrees to reimburse the City immediately upon demand for any and all costs of consulting engineering or planning services, costs of all legal services and all other direct out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the City arising out of or in connection with the preparation, amendment or enforcement of this Agreement. 5. Indemnification Developer agrees, that anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, the City and its agents, officers, councilmembers or employees shall not be personally liable or responsible in any manner to the Developer, the Developer's contractor or subcontractors, materialmen, laborers or to any other person or persons whomsoever, for any claim, demand, damages, actions or causes of action of any kind or character arising out of or by reason of the execution of this Agreement or the performance and completion of the work and the improvements provided herein. The Developer will indemnify and save the City harmless from all such claims, demands, damages, actions or causes of actions or the cost of disbursement, and expenses of defending the same, specifically including, without intending to limit the categories of said costs, cost and expenses for City administrative time and labor, costs of engineering and planning services and costs of all legal services rendered, and other direct out-of-pocket expenses incurred, in connection with defending such claims as may be brought against the City. I 6. Bindin2, Effect a. The terms and provisions hereof will be binding upon and enforceable against the Developer, its representatives, its successors and assigns. b. The Developer acknowledges and agrees that upon entering this Agreement, the City in no way waives its right of final approval of the materials and submissions required herein, including, but not limited to final plans and specifications and the City expressly reserves its right to deny approval of any plans and permits should the Developer fail to proceed in accordance with this Agreement and/or fail to perform in total compliance with the obligations herein. c. The Developer acknowledges and agrees that by entering into this Agreement, the City in no way waives its right of approval, both preliminary and final, of any future improvement, renovation or expansion of the Shopping Center, including but not limited to the addition to the Shopping Center cited in the Developer's Letter, or in any way limits the discretion of the City in connection therewith. d. The Developer acknowledges that the rights of the City to performance of the obligations of the Developer contemplated by and specified within this Agreement are special, unique, and of extraordinary character, and that, in the event that the Developer violates, fails, or refuses to perform any covenant, condition or provision made herein, City may be without an adequate remedy of law. The Developer agrees, therefore, that in the event it violates, fails or refuses to perform any covenant, condition or provision made herein, City may, at its option, institute and prosecute an action to specifically enforce performance of such covenant. No remedy referred in this Agreement is intended to be exclusive and shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy. The election of any one or more remedies shall not constitute a waiver of any other remedy. e. Any term of this Agreement that is illegal or unenforceable at law or in equity shall be deemed to be void and of no force and effect to the extent necessary to bring such term within the provisions of any such applicable law or laws, and such terms are so modified in the balance of the terms of this Agreement shall be enforceable. 7. Notices a. Whenever in this Agreement it shall be required or permitted that notice or demand be served upon either party to this Agreement to or on the other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States Mail to the Addressees hereinafter set forth by certified mail (return receipt requested). Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above. The addresses of the parties hereto are as follows, until changed by notice given as above: If to the City: Mr. Kevin Frazell City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 If to the Developer: Mr. Edward J. Paster Paster Enterprises 2227 University Avenue Saint Paul, MN 55114 8. Release of Security With a copy to: Thomas M. Hart Winthrop & Weinstine 1800 Meritor Tower 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 With a copy to: Mr. Gerald E. Frisch 2350 West 7th Street St. Paul, MN 55116 The City agrees that upon the total performance by the Developer of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, that the City shall release to the Developer the Letter of Credit. 9. Incorporation by Reference All plans, specifications, special provisions, proposals, and contracts for the Improvements, renovation and expansions furnished and performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be and hereby are made a part of this Agreement by reference as fully as if set out herein in full. 10. Liquor License. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to grant to Developer or any tenant of the Shopping Center any license for the sale of alcoholic beverages. Said license must be issued, if at all, by separate action of the City Council. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Developer have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date and year first above written. Dated: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA Its: Mayor Attest: City Clerk PASTER ENTERPRISES By: I ts: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT N1ENDOTA PLAZA EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit A Legal Description of Mendota Plaza Shopping Canter Exhibit B Site Plan of Phase / Renovation Exhibit C Developer's Latter Exhibit E Letter of Credit in the amount of $10,000.00 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION hereby represents that is a registered professional civil engineer licensed to practice in an-a--Fy the State of Minnesota, Licensed No. (hereinafter called the "Engineer"). Engineer hereby certifies and warrants to the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, that the labor, services, and construction to be performed in connection with the renovation of the Mendota Plaza Shopping Center pursuant to that certain Development Agreement between the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, and Paster Enterprises dated May 1 1988, has been fully and finally completed in strict accordance with--tFe plans and specifications submitted to and. approved by the City of Mendota Heights. Engineer hereby further certifies and warrants to the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, that the labor, services, and construction to be performed in connection with the renovation of the Mendota Plaza Shopping Center pursuant to that certain Development Agreement between the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, and Paster Enterprises dated May , 1988, has been fully and finally completed in strict compliance with —aT-City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, State of Minnesota and Federal laws, codes, ordinances, rules and regulations. in STATE OF MINNESOTA )ss. COUNTY OF Its The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisday of 19 by I I the of a Minnesota on behalf of the Notary Public I IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT $10,000.00 Dated as of May 1988 Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit No. TO: City of Mendota Heights •APPLICANT: Paster Enterprises Mendota Heights, Minnesota 2227 University Avenue St. Paul, MN 55114 Gentlemen: We hereby issue in your favor this Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit at the request of and for the account of Paster Enterprises (the "Applicant"), in the amount of Ten Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($10,000.00), which is available by your single sight draft in the form of Exhibit A hereto drawn on us during the time period hereinafter set forth in connection with the renovation of Mendota Plaza Shopping Cehter accompanied by a certificate signed by your City Administrator in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B. Any draft drawn under this Letter of Credit must bear the clause: "DRAWN UNDER THE LETTER OF CREDIT NO. , DATED T draft may only be submitted under ti'i s Letter of Credit, if atall, after May _1 1989 and on or before August 1, 1989. Unless extended by written agreement of the undersigned this Letter of Credit shall automatically terminate at 2:30 p.m. St. Paul time on August 1, 1989 (the "Expiry Date"). Any draft drawn under this Letter of Credit must be presented at the undersigned's main office at , prior to the termination of this Letter of Credit as set forth above. This Letter of Credit is nontransferable and nonnegotiable. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, including the Uniform Commercial Code in effect in said state. Except so far as otherwise stated, this Letter of Credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (1983 rev. International Chamber of Commerce (Publication No. 400). Very truly yours, BAPT B y: Its EXHIBIT A To Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit No. I PLACE: DATE: At sight, pay to the order of City of Mendota Heights the amount of $ This draft is drawn under Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit NO. dated as of issued by BANK. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS in Its: TO: BANK EXHIBIT B To Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit No. DATE: The undersigned, the City Administrator of the City of Mendota Heights (the "City"), hereby certifies to (the "Bank") that, as of the date hereof, Paster Enterprises has failed to fully and finally complete the renovation of the Mendota Plaza Shopping Center in accordance with the terms of that certain Developer's Agreement between the City and said Paster Enterprises dated May _, 1988. This certificate is given to you in connection with your Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit No. dated as of (the "Letter of Credit"), issued in favor of the—Mity and for the account of -Faster Enterprises. The undersigned has executed and delivered this certificate on the day of 1 19 Very truly yours, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS JIM City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 19 by Kevin Frazell, the City Administrator of—t-F-e City of Mendota Heigh -Fs-, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public City Administrator Kevin Frezel) City of Mendota Heights Mendota Heights, MN April 19,1988 Dear Mr. Frezell: We, the founding members of Dakota County Citizens Against Burning (DCCAB) would appreciate the opportunity to speak to the Mendota Heights city council on May 17, 1988 concerning the construction of the 800-ton/day garbage burning incinerator for Dakota County to be built in Rosemount, MN. We believe your city council will be interested in ' information on the following aspects of the incinerator in Dakota County: (1) the information being presented by Dakota County is incomplete and contains inaccurate information which we would like to clarify. (2) literature is available that does show significant data on the hazards and potential impractical costs of incinerating garhager enough to defeat the practice of (3) DCCAB advocates non -burning methods; recycling and composting. DC[AB would like to make a short presentation (15 minutes) on these issues, and then be open for questions from the city council. Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration to this detrimental environmental/economic issue of garbage incineration. DCCAB/s main goal is to help people understand all the issues of garbage burning, and to ' advocate sensible methods of solid waste management. DCCA 9650 Arnold Ave. Inver Grove Heights, MN 55075 ,. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO APRIL 26, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Ad n��or FROM: Paul Kaiser, Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Variance Appeal from South Eagle Ridge Condo Association, 1850-1860 Eagle Ridge Drive DISCUSSION• Members of the South Eagle Ridge Condo Association wish to appear before the City Council on May 1-7, to seek a variance from City fire codes, which is their right under the City's Fire Prevention Code. The Association will appeal items 1 and 2 of my orders dated March 8, 1988, which requires: 1. The automatic fire protection system to be expanded to cover the entire garage. 2. To install two Class 1 (wet) standpipes in the stairwells located at each end of the building. HISTORY: Briefly, the problems date back to November 22, 1972, the date a construction permit was applied for. The State Building Code was in effect on July 1, 1972, but not adopted by Mendota Heights until 1974. In an agreement between the Attorney General's Office, the State Building Code Division, and the State Fire Marshal's office, any building constructed after July 1, 1972, and not constructed to the Uniform Building Code would be treated as an "existing building" and the enforcing code would be the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. The enforcing code in the City is the 1982 Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. This code requires automatic fire protection in any basement or story when the floor area exceeds 1500 square feet, and when at least 20 square feet of opening every 50 lineal feet of exterior wall on at least one side of the building is not provided. The code further states that when there are openings on one side of the story, and the opposite wall is more than 75 feet from such openings, there should be provided an approved automatic sprinkler system. This complex does not meet either of these conditions. To further complicate this problem, the partial automatic sprinkler system now in operation, was improperly installed and by order of St. Paul Water authority, will have to be removed from the domestic service, leaving the entire basement area without fire protection. The Minnesota Uniform Fire Code also requires standpipes in all occupancies that are 3 stories or more in height. These condos are 3 stories in height. Complicating this lack of fire protection is the location of this complex from the water supply and the location from the street. Any fire in this building would require firefightebs to carry a large amount of heavy fire hose into the upper reaches of this building to effect'an adequate fire attack. This would be time and energy consuming and could greatly impact on the spread of fire and life safety. State Statutes allow for a variance to the Fire Codes if (1) there is substantial compliance with the code, (2) the safety of the.public and occupants of such buildingwill not i be Jeopardized, and (3) undue hardship will result f the variance is not granted., Staff estimates it would cost approximately $45,000 for code requirement. This is $865 per unit in this 52 unit complex. The cost figures submitted indicate the cost of installinv a six inch pipe from the property line, installation of the automatic fire protection, and the installation of the standpipes is $37,565. St. Paul Water will charge $4750 for connecting the six inch pipe from the street to the property line. The remaining amount is in the event of cost over -run. CTION REQUIRED: Council should discuss this problem with the Association members and decide what course of action they wish to pursue. PMK:madlr April 28, 1988 Kathleen Swanson City Clerk City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Ms. Swanson: Eagle Ridge Condominium Association requests a hearing before the City Council of Mendota Heights to appeal a request from the Fire Marshall Paul M. Kaiser per his letter dated March 8, 1988, regarding item 1. Thank you for your consideration. Res ectf lly Vus Rosen President, Eagle Ridge Condominium Association CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 10, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City"'_)r—ator FROM: Dick Gill, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Contel Parking Lot Expansion INTRODUCTION: Peter Brozek of TKDA is proposing a parking lot expansion for the Contel property in the Industrial Park. See enclosed letter of request. DISCUSSION: Although a building permit is not necessary for this type of work, the plans have been reviewed by both code enforcement and engineering departments. The set backs are more than adequate, the landscaping plan is consistent with what is existing, and the engineering department is satisfied with drainage system as proposed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the granting of this request subject to the contractors being licensed as per city requirements. ACTION REQUIRED: If council wishes to implement the staff recommendation it should pass a motion to approve the construction of the addition to the parking lot. RAG:np XDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS May 9, 1988 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 Re: Parking Lot Expansion for Continental Telephone of Minnesota, Inc. 1500 Mendota Heights Road Mendota Heights, Minnesota TKDA Commission No. 9211-01 Honorable Mayor and City Counci I : T.OLTZ. KING. DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-1893 612/292-4400 FAX 612/292.0083 On behalf of our client, Continental Telephone, we are seeking approval for the above -referenced project. The project involves the extension of the existing parking lot for the addition of a total of thirty (30) spaces. This will alleviate the current use of the street for employee parking. The work includes additional bituminous paving, concrete walks, site fighting, sodding and the relocation of two trees. Site drainage will uti I ize an existing catch basin and storm drainage system. The net increase in impervious area is 12,000 sq.ft. and the area of sodding will remain approximately the same. The enclosed plans are hereby submitted for your approval. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely yours, v Peter M. Brozek, AIA Project Manager PM/ I I cc: Dennis Peterson - Contel Paul Berg - Mendota Heights Rich Gray, ASLA - TKDA CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 11, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets Huber Drive/Mendota Heights Road Job No. 8519 Improvement No. 86, Project No. I DISCUSSION: At the May 10th meeting Council expressed a concern over whether Frattalone, the Mendota Heights Road/Huber Drive contractor, would still honor their bid. The bids were opened March 31st but have not yet been awarded because the City has not yet received the south half of the Mendota Heights Road right-of-way from Centex, Centex is waiting for their Indirect Source Permit (ISP) from MPCA before the close on the land with Riley. I called Frattalone and they told me that they would honor their bid at least until the July 5th City Council meeting. I sent them a letter offi- cially requesting an extension on the award date. They said that they would respond back in writing that they would extend the date. ACTION REQUIRED: None, for information only. •r CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 13, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Brian Birch - Car Wash Request DISCUSSION: At the last Council meeting Mr. Birch's request to construct a carwash on his property at Dodd Road and Trunk Highway 110 was tabled pending some research by the City Attorney. Mr. Birch alleged that a car wash could be allowed within the existing zoning. At the time the agenda was prepared Attorney Hart had not completed his research, however he assured me that he would be prepared to address the issue the evening of the Council meeting. I have attached a copy of Mr. Birch's arguements. ACTION REQUIRED: Discuss with City Attorney Hart and Mr. Birch the possibilties of constructing a car wash at the northeast corner of Dodd Road and Trunk Highway 110 and give staff direction on how to proceed. 0 4.04-A An ordinance must be reasonable certain in its terms so men of common intelligence must not have to guess at its meaning and differ as to its application. St Paul Vs Kekedakis '72 A A valid regulating ordinance may be rendered invalid by a change of conditions. Sullivan Vs City of Shreveport D An ordinance must be made on a reasonable basis v, discrimination to all similar situations. E An ordinance must not be arbitrary and unreasonable complaining party. 6.00 B State Vs Modern Box Ptak E Ordinances must not be in unreasonable restraint of trade. 6.00-A Primary purpose of ordinances is to conserve property values, health, morals, and general welfare. Pearce Vs Edina '62, Connor - Vs Chanhassen '57 B An ordinance is valid if it operates uniformaly on all persons similarly situated in the district. B The intent is not to create monopolies, within certain areas. Pearce Vs Edina '62 B Where doubt exists as to the intent, it must favor the owner. OU Ordinances must be subject to vested property interests of lawful business and uses already established within the zone. Hawkins Vs Talbot '57; Conner Vs Chanhassen '57 F Special use is to meet the situations of inherent hazards or special problems which its location poses and must be a substantial detriment to neighboring property. J Courts consider the uses or classifications of property adjacent to that involved. J The court is not bound by the city councils recitation of the facts where there is no evidence to support its conclusions. J A private party owner injured by the violation of a zoning ordinance is entitled to injunctive relief. 6.01-6 Apparent conflicts in a zoning ordinance must be considered in the light of the principle purpose,of the ordinance. Introduction: Name- Brian L. Birch Address- 755 Willow Lane, Mendota Heights Years- 21 years Purpose: To obtain a building permit for a coin operated carwash and professional office building. ; b:, V t 11 Zoned: B-2 Neighborhood Permitted suggested uses applicable to us: 13.1(4) Auto accessory store 13.1(15) Dry cleaning and laundry 13.1(22) Laundry of the self service type 13.1(25) Office Opening Statement: Based upon the above description of this particular zoned property which I own, the permitted uses listed, and the existing businesses established in this area, I feel that I should be issued the appropriate building permit. I give the following reasons in more detail backed by statutes of law: 1. Neighborhood business is a planned local business which provides services of neighborhood needs. ( See American Jurisprudence volume 82 section 143. Note: hereafter, like references will be similar to this - 82 -143) 2. Permitted uses 13.1(4) and (25) are accurate uses to our property. 13.1(15) is accurate and is also similar. 13.1(22) is accurate, too. Statute 73-23 is specific in equating coin operated carwashes with self service laundries, and 73-46 states that carwashes and coin operated laundries are similar. 3. See 02-37, the property already conforms with the uses and zoning of the adjacent properties. 4. See82- I 19, the rule- if a type of business is not particularly excluded by name in the ordinance, then the business may be conducted if it is not a nusiance. 5. See62-15, an ordinance must meet the Test of Reasonableness. It cannot be unreasonable, arbitrary, capricious or oppressive. 6. See 82-105, to exclude one type of building and to allow another of the some general character is invalid reasoning. 7. See 82-126, a carwashing business is a permitted type of operation in a commercial zone. S. See 82-285, we can show that a carwash is reasonably necessary for the public convenience since none exists within the city. 9. See 62-287 & 291, a carwash does not adversely effect neighboring property and therefore it is a justified use. Its effect is not greater than those uses permitted in the zone now. 10. See 82-33 & 265, courts will balance the public and private interests and consider the trend of development in the area. Zoning should never be allowed or disallowed on the basis of a plebicite of the neighbors. 11. zoning is to meet the needs, desires and resources of all categories of people who desire to live in Mendota Heights. In conclusion I believe that the above information clearly demonstrates that I am entitled to be issued a building permit without prejudice. I believe that it is in the best interest of the residents of Mendota Heights as well as the city government to be able to have a carwash facility in our city. 'I believe that this business will provide me and my family a business that we can be proud to operate and one the community can,with pride, use, look at, and live near. Sincerely, Brian L. Birch INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 750 SOUTH PLAZA DRIVE MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA 55120 Bidders are invited to submit proposals for a telephone system and/or telephone wiring and jacks for a new City Hall being constructed at 1101 Highway 110. Bids will be received by the City no later than "-2:00 P.M. , C.D.S.T. on Tuesday , June 21st at the City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120. Each proposal must be submitted in a sealed envelope on or before the time specified and at the place specified and must be clearly marked: "PROPOSAL FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEM" Bids shall be submitted on. 2 original copies on the Bid Proposal included herewith. The City will not be responsible for late mail deliveries and no proposals will be accepted if delivered after the specified date and time. All bids are to be accompanied by a Cash Deposit, Bid Bond, or a Certified Check in an amount of not less than 5% of the total amount of the bid and shall be made payable to the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota without reserve. The City reserves the right to hold all bids for up to forty-five (45) days. Award to the successful Bidder will be made within forty-five (45) days of bid opening. Following completion of bid evaluation, all Guaranties shall be returned, except those Guaranties of the three Lowest Responsible Bidders, which will be retained until a contract has been approved, filed and executed. The City reserves the right to refect any and all proposals. Bidders must comply with all requirements as directed or required by this notice. Notice is hereby given to all bidders that any proposal found to be defective, incomplete or otherwise irregular, may be rejected immediately. Inquiries concerning this RFP can be made at the City offices during business hours. Contact: Kathleen Swanson, City Clerk Telephone: (612) 452-1850 or by contacting: Mr. Bill Burke Burke Engineering Telephone: (612) 454-3464 A tour of the facility will be given at 2:00'P.M, on Friday, June 10th, to all Bidders notifying the City Clerk by June 8th. N Page 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY HALL 1101 HIGHWAY NO. 110 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA 55118 1.0 General Description of the Facility and the Schedule The City of Mendota Heights, MN (hereinafter referred to as the City), is constructing a new City Hall. The building is a two story structure with City offices and Council Chambers on the upper level, and the Police Department and office expansion on the lower level. Construction work is underway and occupancy is scheduled for about October 1, 1988. Therefore, the schedule for the work covered by this specification is as follows: Telephone wiring and jacks: Complete by September 16, 1988. Telephone system operational: Complete by September 23, 1988. 2.0 Proposals You are invited to submit a proposal to the City in conformance with the provisions of these specifications, for the provision and installation of the items listed below. Contractors may bid for the "telephone wiring and jacks" (items I & 2 below), the "telephone system" (items 3 through 7 below), or both. 1. All station cables and wires and termination in No. 66 type connecting blocks in Room 134. 2. Termination of all station cables and wires in appropriate jacks at the station location. 3. An electronic key telephone system. 4. All jumper work, including interconnection to the Northwestern Bell Telephone Company facilities. 5. All station apparatus, telephone sets, and miscellaneous equipment. 6. Training of the City personnel on system and station features and equipment. 7. 100% service and parts maintenance for a one year warranty - guaranteed period. Each proposal received will be evaluated based upon, but not limited to, the following criteria: 1. Conformance to this specification. 2. Ease and reliability of system operation. 3. Procurement and operating costs. Page 2 4. Expansion capability. 5. Service/parts accessibility. 6. Reliability and accessibility of the service organization. 2.1 Response Validity and Pricing The contractor shall provide fixed costs for the basic system, additions, and deletions described in this specification. All costs shall be shown on the "Telephone System Cost Sheet", specification Attachment C. These costs shall be valid through delivery and installation of the telephone system. 2.2 Cost of Proposals Vendors submitting the proposals in response to the RFP do so on the basis of future business with the City. All costs for preparing and submitting such proposals are to be borne by the prospective vendors. The City is under no obligation to reimburse any vendor for any costs associated with preparing and/or submitting a proposal. 2.3 Local Conditions Since the work includes furnishing services, the vendor shall thoroughly inform itself of all conditions and factors which would affect the completion of such work. All such factors must be property investigated and considered in the preparation of the proposal submitted. No claims for financial adjustment to any contract awarded for the work under these specifications will be permitted by the City, which are based on the lack of such prior information or its effect on the cost of the work. 3.0 Proprietary Information This Request for Proposal and all drawings, designs, specifications, and.other data appended or related to it are the property of the City and are delivered only for the purpose of enabling each potential vendor to prepare and submit a proposal in response thereto. The information contained or referred to in this Request for Proposal or appended to it is not to be disclosed or released to any third party for any purpose and must be returned to the City when requested. 4.0 Deviations and Exceptions Any and all deviations and/or exceptions to these specifications must be clearly itemized and explained on a separate sheet of paper and provided with each proposal. Failure to delineate all exceptions or deviations may result in rejection of the proposal. 5.0 Installation Materials and Workmanship Communications contractors submitting bid proposals must be Page 3 singly capable of supplying, installing and maintaining all telephone systems, equipment and features specified in these specifications, and training the City's personnel on the use of the system and station features and equipment. The communications contractor shall furnish all the labor and materials to complete all telephone work specified in these specifications including: 1. Complete the telephone system starting at the termination of common carrier's lines in Room 134 of the Office Building. 2. Install and connect all necessary telephone instruments and equipment to permit full, proper and continuous operation of all specified telephone system features and equipment. 3. Utilize existing conduit, as specified in section 11.1. 4. Complete all work in full conformance with the local and National Electrical Code (NEC) requirements, and Part 68- 215FCC Code. 5. Secure, pay and comply with all permits and certificates required by local and state laws and ordinances including Fire Underwriter's Certificate of Inspection. 6. All work shall be executed in a workmanlike manner and shall present a neat appearance upon completion. All communication system installers shall have had experience in the installation of similar systems or components prior to installation of this system. 7. The contractor and mechanics will supply all necessary craft tools, instruments and other equipment required for telecommunication system installation and start-up. 8. Comply with all federal, state, and local rules and regulations governing the installation of telephone systems, and provide documentation to the City on the F.C.C. registration numbers for all telecommunications equipment to be installed. 9. Promptly restore or reconnect any and all communication or non -communication equipment which may be moved or temporarily disconnected due to the installation of the telecommunication system. 10. Maintain contact with the City's representative with information as to the progress of the installation. 11-. Perform functional testing of the telephone company's lines and coordinate the resolution of any difficulties encountered. 6.0 Guaranty -Warranty 1. The communication contractor shall furnish a written warranty, countersigned and guaranteed by him stating that all system components provided, supplied and installed by his company will be free from defects in equipment, Out E Page 4 workmanship, and materials for a period of one year from the date of final acceptance of the work by the City. If any equipment is not functioning satisfactorily, the contractor will replace the equipment at the City's request within 14 days from the date of the request. 2. The communication contractor further agrees that he will, at his own expense, repair and/or replace to the City's satisfaction any such defective telecommunication work and any building damage caused thereby during the Guaranty - Warranty period. 3. The communication contractor further agrees to make available to the City a service maintenance contract after expiration of Guaranty -Warranty period at the City's request. Service Response Time The contractor, by accepting a purchase order referencing this specification, agrees to provide the following repair response times. Emergency Services - the contractor shall -dispatch qualified technicians immediately for arrival at the site within two (2) hours, twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven -days a week after receiving notification of a major interruption of service. A major interruption of service involves an equipment outage of all or a substantial part of the installed system (e.g.; complete system failure, console failure, incoming or outgoing calling service failure). Other Maintenance Service - all other maintenance service requests will normally be responded to within four (4) hours of the City's request between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. The contractor agrees to provide the City with permanent 24 hour repair service telephone numbers. Separate day and night numbers may be used. Training to be Provided by the Contractor The contractor shall coordinate the scheduling and the content of all training with the City's representative. The training shall include, but not be limited to the following: 1. "Hands-on" console training for the attendants. 2. Small group sessions for all station users. 3. The use of all system and station user features. 4. Telephone etiquette. Copies of user instructions must be made available at all training sessions. Two copies of the attendant instructions must also be available. Initial training must be completed no later than 2 days after Page 5 the system cut -over date. Follow-up training will include items 1-4 above, and must be scheduled with the City's representative. Upon completion of all training, the contractor shall obtain a release, signed by the City's representative indicating satisfactory compliance. 9.0 General 1. Rejection of Proposals - The City will accept the lowest bid that meets the Request for Proposals, however the City reservs the right to reject bids and proposals if the City determines that the equipment proposed is of inferior or lower grade quality than requested by the City in its discretion. 2. Changes in Specifications - The City may, during the bidding period, advise the bidder by bulletin or addenda of additions, omissions, or alterations in the specifications and drawings. All such changes shall be included in the work covered by the proposal, and shall become a part of the specifications as if originally submitted. 3. Notification of Award: The successful bidder will be notified of the award of the contract in writing and will be expected to properly and promptly execute a contract with the City. 10.0 Materials and Information to be Furnished with Proposals All proposals must include the applicable items listed below: 1. Completed copy of Telephone System Cost Sheets, Specification Attachment C. 2. Descriptive system literature on the proposed "Telephone System", and all station and miscellaneous apparatus. 3. List itemizing and explaining any deviations or exceptions to these specifications. 4. A list of references, preferably City Government installations, for the system being proposed to the City of Mendota Heights. Contact persons and telephone numbers shall be included. 5. A detailed system implementation schedule defining the contractor's, the City's and other parties responsibilities. 6. Special space/power requirements or environmental conditioning essential to the successful installation, and continued operation of the system. 7. Attendant console and station user instructions. 8. Current financial information about contractor, including a certified audit for the last two years showing assets and net worth, or other statement of a third party attesting to the financial stability of the company. Page 6 9. Copy of the guarantee -warranty agreement. 10. Copy of a service maintenance agreement. 11. Color charts showing the available colors for the telephone instruments. 11.0 Telephone Equipment Room The telephone: equipment room is inside Room 134, lower level. The approximate dimensions of the telephone room are five feet by ten feet. All walls are lined with 3/4 inch plywood. This room will house the following: 1. The Northwestern Bell Telephone Company demarcation connections (RJ21X or equivalent) for business telephone lines, and private line circuits. 2. The electronic key telephone system common equipment provided by the telephone system contractor. 3. The termination of all station wiring in appropriate No. 66 type connecting blocks with proper designation strips identifying room numbers, and station numbers shown on the key telephone system sheets. 11.1 Telephone Conduits The following conduits are reserved for telephone system use: 1. One four inch conduit from Room 134 to the property line is reserved for the Northwestern Bell Telephone Company entrance cable. 2. One two inch conduit from Room 134 to Room 202 - reception area for the attendant console cable. 3. One two inch conduit from Room 134 to Room 102 - reception area for the Police Department receptionist. 4. All other telephone outlets have conduits stubbed into the ceiling area. 5. Two two inch conduits from Room 134 that is stubbed to the upper level ceiling above Room 204. These conduits shall be used for all station wires in the upper level, other than the reception area. 6. Two two inch conduits from Room 134 that is stubbed to the lower level ceiling above Room 114. These conduits shall be used for all station wires in the lower level, other than the reception area. 11.2 Telephone Wiring and Jacks The entire structure has air plenum ceilings. The contractor shall provide teflon type fire retardant wiring in these air plenums. The two exceptions are the upper level and lower level reception areas (station A, upper level, and station b, lower level), which have conduit runs to the telephone equipment room. Page 7 All wiring shall be "home runs" from the station jack to the telephone equipment room. The average length run for all sixty locations in the building is about 120 feet. The contractor shall provide the following wiring: 1. Four twisted pairs of telephone wire to each initial and future telephone location. This includes one spare pair. The number of locations is sixty (upper level 29, lower level 31). 2. Two twisted pairs of telephone wire for possible future modems at the following locations: Ouantity Location 18 upper level stations A, C thru J, and P thru W. 1 lower level machine room, Room 103 (there is no telephone in this room). The contractor shall provide the following jacks: Quantity Type Location 18 Duplex: One three pair & Upper level, one two pair see 2. above. 42 Single: One three pair Other initial & future telephone locations. 1 Single: One two pair Machine Room, Room 103, see 2. above. 12.0 Telephone System The system shall be an electronic key telephone as configured in the attached "key telephone system sheets upper level and lower level". 'The "key telephone sheets" depict locations, stations, pickups, ringing arrangements, intercom, and lines. The symbols used on the "key telephone sheets" are as follows: M.L. Set Multi -line telephone set P Pickup - inbound and outbound calls PI Pickup - inbound calls only PO Pickup - outbound calls only R Line ring X Intercom I.C. No. Intercom number (to be assigned) 12.1 Telephone System Capacity Page 8 The telephone system key service unit shall have the following minimum capacities without adding cabinetry: Lines 20, Stations 60. 12.2 Telephone System Initial Size The telephone system key service unit shall be equipped with common equipment and circuit cards for the following: Lines 16, Stations 44. 12.3 Telephone Instruments Color Preference: Gray Quantity Description 1 1 28 7 1 1 1 12.4 Features. Attendant console including busy lamp field & direct station selection Multi -line desk telephone set with 20 station busy lamp field Multi -line desk telephone set Multi -line wall telephone set Elevator single line telephone set Outdoor single line telephone set in weatherproof cabinet Intercom Box: speaker -microphone only At a minimum, the telephone system shall have the following features: System Features Add-on Conference: One outside line, and up to five inside stations Two outside lines Up to five inside stations ARPL (Automatic Ring Private Line): Termination in system, and station line key. Console: Busy lamp field, and direct station selection Intercom: Minimum three paths Hands free answer back - on hook Busy signal to calling station when called station is off hook Option, where desired: Hands free answer back - both on hook and off hook Page 9 Power Surge Protection Privacy Speed Dialing: two digit minimum list size: 100 sixteen digit numbers Touch-tone: DTMF Dialing Station Features Adjustable Audible Signal: Line and intercom Busy lamp field option Do not disturb: Outside calls only Outside calls and intercom calls Flash key: For possible use with Tel. Co. "Central Office" features Hold: regular exclusive Integrated Speaker phone Option Privacy Release Ring Transfer Arrangement: Operate key to activate programmed ringing for a line or lines that normally do not ring at that station. L.E.D. Indicator when feature is activated Single Line Intercom Station: Application - door and elevator telephones, with access to outside line by dialing a single digit. Speed Dialing: Single Digit List Size: Ten sixteen digit numbers Toll Restriction Option: plus chargeable calls 12.5 Telephone Company Services Deny access to "O" plus, and "1" The telephone system contractor shall be responsible for placing orders with Northwestern Bell Telephone Company for all telephone services associated with this installation, and for the on-time delivery of these services. Also see Section 5.0 item 11. • 0r� N£NN -M �� ni� � , N W $i N W -4 N rn d N ch ooro ra N O °Di. \n N 00 � \n F\) CA w � \n N M) \n N �' N 0, to •3 w 00 Ih K d 4�'� K o to '1 X O e O b J't� I�' b !1 ti "a � aj I � N RECEPTION AREA Attendant Consol OO �► b w W MNL. SetE ROOM 0 SENIOR SECRETARY M. L. Set O Q OM.ECARY L. Set O �v O O O ti m N 0 CLERICAL M. L. Set N � CLERICAL M. L. Set O� p ti ii " 0 MLERICAL Set 0 CLERICAL Future O C O b ~ N CODE ENF. OFF. M. L. Set `0 ASST. CODE ENF. M. L. Set -- Cv O Q V � 0 u` DRAFTING STUDIO M. L. Set - lrall x �v O O O bN O ti b r ON DRAFTING STUDIO M. L. Set UoU\' DRAFTING STUDIO M. L. Set 0 DRAFTING STUDIO Future 0 0, v. DRAFTING STUDIO Future — — — — _ — OV b N `i ENGINEER M. L. Set X Q O O e G \ p 0 CO DIR. PUB. WORKS M. L. Set %b O C O �• 14ACIIINE ROOM M. L. Set - Wall _ x 4 O O Q P. . L.ADMSet y a CITY ADM. Future X OHO 4 0 ti �Iti b� 0\ oFc. M. L. Set x b U �f �1 iJ a N. OFC. M. L. Set O Ou V N oo OFC. M. L. Set O O O O U \� b H N o CONFERENCE ROOM M. L. Set - Wall G v Q b O K N- CORRIDOR M. L. Set - Wall v Zi N N, LUNCHROOM ra. L. set - Wall N. v' LUNCIIROO14 Future N AUDIO VIDEO Future e W COUNCIL CHAM. M. L. Set n H F4 O �i H' a. H H En En b n H H 0 H H O z H H a s Imo i H O n O -'s + . . . + . .0 r . N -' r 18 • . .O OD :1 !- V� r W N -- [ y; ) �r 'T7 �fKKD11: r �1J�1 N un N N •• �3 N N N N fA l,l .1 1sy7i lC iy= F'1 +Z'I C�l'J CDi ll� M T T OUTDOOR Single Line Set X a b �v w N MCEPTL. Set with ' \20 ly Sta. ST _xNK – RECEPTION AREA not Future U -• 0 -tri SECRETARY M. L. Set ro o WORK STATION M. L. Set X Q O 0 o WAITING AREA M. h. SET CLERICAL n O Future X -t4 'Itsca o DETECTIVES 1-n M. L. Set X 1 �i o CHIEF POLICE Se M. L. Set X ti SERGEANTS OFC. Sett V SERGEANTS OFC. -tr M. L. Set r I:: SERGEANTS OFC. Future SERGEANTS OFC. Future %QUIET v' INTERVIEW M. L. Set 'X o - INTERVIEW M. L. set N PROCESSING O Future -- — X — N EVIDENCE ROOM M. L. Set X Z U v ti wN SQUAD ROOM M. L. Set SQUAD ROOM Future y N SQUAD ROOM Future d SQUAD R0014 Future X Its W AREA id. L. Set -Wall JA TELEPHONE ROOM M. L. Set - Wall k0lELEVATOR Single Line Set OFFICE EXPANSION o Future OFFICE EXPANSION N Future OFFICE EXPANSION 81 Future OFFICE EXPANSION o Future r OFFICE EXPANSION o Future OFFICE EXPANSION o Future X r; WAITLNG AREA n H F4 O �i H' a. H H En En b n H H 0 H H O z H H a s Imo i TELEPHONE SYSTEM COST SHEET SPECIFICATION ATTACHMENT C City of Mendota Heights City Hall 1101 Highway 110 Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Date: Proposal submitted by: Telephone System Proposed: Feature Program Proposed: Installed cost of the telephone wiring and as defined=in Specification Section 11.0 through 11.2 ... Additions/Deletions jacks R Installed Cost - Four twisted pair station wire per 100 foot run - Two twisted pair station wire per 100 foot run - Duplex jack, one three pair & one two pair - Single jack, one three pair - Single hack, one two pair Installed cost of the telephone system as defined in Specification Section 12.0 through 12.5 ... Additions/Deletions - Central office line card: Capacity - Station Card: Capacity Stations - Attendant Console, including busy lamp and direct station selection - Multi -line desk telephone set with 20 station busy lamp field - Multi -line desk telephone set - Multi -line wall telephone set - Elevator single line telephone set - Outdoor single line telephone set in weatherproof cabinet - Intercom Box speaker -microphone only - Multi -line desk/wall telephone with integrated speaker phone Lines field Installed Cost CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO MAY 11, 1988 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin City Administrator SUBJECT: Appointment of Mendota Heights Representative to Dakota County Recycling Subcommittee Council will recall that Dakota County has asked us to appoint a Mendota Heights community representative to the Recycling Subcommittee. By the attached letter, Mr. Richard R. Lachenmayer, 1253 Culligan Lane, has indicated his interest. Dick attended the meeting of the recycling subcommittee on Tuesday, May 10. After attending, he felt sufficiently interested that he is willing to serve as our representative. Chuck Bangasser, 2223 Copperfield Drive, has also contacted me about some interest in serving. However, Chuck seems to have some difficulty in committing to being there each month. It would be my recommendation that Council appoint Richard Lachenmayer as our representative, and Chuck Bangasser as an alternate. ACTION REOUIRED: If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass a motion appointing Richard Lachenmayer as the Mendota Heights representative to the Dakota County Recycling Subcommittee, and Chuck Bangasser as alternative representative. KDF:madlr attachment May 4, 1988 Mr. Kevin Frazell Mendota Heights City Administrator 750 S. Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mr. Frazell: The purpose of this letter is to indicate my interest in serving on the Solid Waste Committee for Mendota Heights and Dakota County. In regards to my qualifications, experience and interest, the -following is offered. I am a graduate Electrical Engineer from the U of M in 1962. 1 have beeen with Unisys for 27 years and am presently a group manager in the Air Traffic Control Division in Eagan. I have served on various city and church committees in the past and am a member of the Sierra Club and The Nature Conservancy. I have also been a resident of Mendota Heights for 24 years. If I could be of service to the city, and depending on the time demands, I would consider serving on the committee. Regards, Richard R. Lachenmayer 1253 Culligan Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55118 452-1243 I CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 7&1. . MEMO May 13, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Street Light Request DISCUSSION: Mr. Tim Curley, who lives and works around a City bike trail located at the intersection of Trunk Highway 110 and Lexington Avenue (see attached drawing), feels that the bike trail is too dark at night and is dangerous. He requests that the City install a light. An NSP fixture could be mounted on a nearby pole as shown on the drawing. ACTION REQUIRED:. Review Mr. Curley's request and give staff direction on whether to order an NSP light as requested. 12 1 I1 I t0 .W -- —— -- — — -- -' 'ESA ST it d 3 O til 1 '7nt)j • 8 t i m Ii 7 t 1 H O -i D I, —EXISTING t� WALL t+o i 6 ii l i t it `J h ti i ii 4 ii i it !i i) I_ li ii i) it 11 -uZJQJ-S! OUTLOT C Ci i CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 16, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council, City ator FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Contractor License Ordinance Amendment INFORMATION A memo regarding proposed language amending the insurance provisions of the contractor license ordinance was included in the agenda packet. We have prepared the proposed amending ordinances, one rescinding the the 1987 amendment and the other replacing the insurance requirement section with new language. RECOMMENDATION Since I am by no means an expert on insurance or insurance terms,.I have solicited the input of two experts as was stated in last Friday's memo. I am confident that their advice will serve the City, homeowners and contractors well and recommend adoption of the attached proposed Ordinances. ACTION_REQUIRED If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should adopt Ordinance No. 255, "AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 233," and Ordinance No. 256, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 601, by separate motions. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 13, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administrator FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Amendment to Contractor License Ordinance DISCUSSION At the last meeting, Council considered an amendment to the contractor licensing ordinance as relates to insurance requirements. Councilmember Blesener questioned the proposal to increase the property damage requirement. We have further researched this matter and have discussed the requirement both with the LMC expert on insurance, Peter Tritz, who had recommended the $500,000 limit and Rich Fleischakker, the City's insurance representative. Mr. Fleischakker agreed with Pete's recommendation to the extent of coverage. He did, however suggest that all limits be established at $500,000.. He•felt that this would provide commonality on all certificates and would cause no significant increase in cost while satisfying the Loss Control Adjustor's concerns. I have not had the time to prepare the ordinance amendment as yet, but will provide you with an amending ordinance in the add-on agenda. The language of the amendment will be as follows: "The contractor shall procure and maintain during the life of the license period, commercial general liability insurance covering personal injury including bodily injury and .property damage liability with a combined single limit of no less than $500,000 for each occurrence and aggregate.: This language was written by Rich and is industry standard language. Rich is not only the City's expert on insurance, but also, his firm provides coverage for contractors in several communities. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 255 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 233 The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota ordains as follows: SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 233, known and referred to as "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 601" is hereby repealed. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its publication according to law. Enacted and ordained into an Ordinance this 17th day of May, 1988. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mer enso o Mayor H ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 256 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 601 The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, ordains as follows: SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 601, known and referred to as "AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE LICENSING OF CERTAIN BUSINESSES AND OCCUPATIONS AND PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION THEREOF," is hereby amended in the following respects: A. Section•�13 of said Ordinance No. 601 is hereby amended in its entirety so that as amended it shall read as follows: SECTION 13. LIABILITY INSURANCE Any person holding a license hereunder shall file with the City Clerk policies of public liability and property damage insurance which shall remain and be in force and effect during the entire term of said license and which shall contain a provision that they shall not be cancelled without 10 days written notice to the City. The contractor shall procure and maintain during the life of the license period, commercial general liability insurance covering personal injury including bodily injury and property damage liability with a combined single limit of no less than $500,000 for each occurrence and aggregate. Said policies of insurance shall further provide for indemnity and security to the City of Mendota Heights against any liability and/or responsibility for the acts, actions, or omissions of the licensee or of any of the agents or servants of such licensee subject, however, to the limitations as to the amount herein stated. No work shall be done under any license hereunder until said insurance policies shall have been filed and approved by the City Clerk. Provided, however, that in the case of plumbers who have obtained a license to perform such work from the State of Minnesota, there shall be no liability insurance required under the provisions of this Section. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its publication according to law. Enacted and ordained into an Ordinance this 17th day of May, 1988. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By. Charles E. Mer enso o Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 12, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Klayton H. Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Soo Line Railroad Crossing Northland Drive Job No. 8232 DISCUSSION: The City has been working with Soo Line Railroad for several years in an attempt to complete the at grade crossing of Northland Drive. As part of the process, the City must obtain an easement for the encroachment of City right-of-way on the Soo Line right-of-way. Soo Line has just finished the legal work necessary for the crossing and requires that the City pay $5,500 for the permanent crossing. The cost of the easment was included in the cost estimate of the crossing construction. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council authorize staff to make a payment in the amount of $5,500 to Soo Line Railroad. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with the staff recommendation they should pass a motion acknowledging the receipt of the Soo Line easement and authorize payment of $5,500 to the Soo Line Railroad.