1988-12-20CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
DECEMBER 20, 1988 - 8:00 P.M.
1.
Call
to Order. - ?-,o Y
2.
Roll
Call. -a rL�
3.
Agenda
Adoption. - S
4.
Approval,of
Minutes of November 1, November 9 Election
Canvass,
November 151 and November 29 Joint Meeting.
5.
Consent Calendar:-
alendar:_a.
a.
Acknowledgement of November Treasurer Report.
b.
Adoption of Ordinance No. 260. (Stop Signs).
J c.
Approval of Kensington PUD Time Extension.-
d.
Acknowledgement of Letter from U.S. Dept. of
Interior.
e.
Acknowledgement of Pending Rate Increase for
f.
Continental Cablevision Subscribers.
Acknowledgement of Commission Terms of Expiration.-
"
g.
Acknowledgement of Resignation.
h.
Approval of Final Payment Resolution No. 88-98.
i.
Approval of 1986 Improvement Bonds Tax Exemption.:
(Resolution No. 88-99).
j.
Approval of Mendakota Country Club Private Watermain
Agreement.
k.
Approval of the List of Licenses.
1.
Approval of the List of Claims.
End
of Consent Calendar.
6. Presentation:
t
a. Flag Presentation by Mendota VFW Post #6690 Repre-
sentatives.
b. Discussion of January 15 Open House. (Sharon Koll
will be present). Also, Discussion of Dei tion
Plaque for New i'tj� ��H,accll. 7p
7. Public Comments.
8. Unfinished and New Business:
a. Purchase of Equipment for Exercise Room. (Repre-
sentatives will be present to answer questions).
b. Request for Sign Permit for Centre Pointe Medical ?r -
I
N
1
Clinic.
c. MSA Five Year Plan. (Resolution No. 88-100).
d. Recycling Container Information. — 14 -
e. Appointmpnt of Citiens Par —
P ommittee..
h
f Poli?Vop Co un y se of city Hall.
g. 1989 Salarie and enefits for Non -organized
Employees. (Resolutions No. 88-101 and 88-102).
h. LeVxjngtfon�fl3,,O Redevel , asal JQ es.
_1opment Apprai 1 t
4 - -6 7� ot) -
ion. (Resolutuion No. 88-10
i. C__ pplicat(5 3)
j. Snowplowing Report.
k. Agreement with St. Paul Water for Remote Water Meter
Installation. — 6Q;j-- %'f —/ j ;?: f,
4
1. Airport Runway Extension. A
M. Dakota CQuntv Legislative Program.
9. Response to Council Comments:
a. Fina Convenience Mart Remodeling.
.LV Council Comments: Oq . A
1. Adjourn.
C
3(/
MEMO
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
December 20, 1988
To: Mayor
From: Kevin
and City Council
Fra' Administrator
Re: Add -On Agenda for December 20th
There are no new items for this evening's agenda, and
additional information is submitted for only two existing
items. (See how responsive staff can be at salary setting
time!)
3. Agenda Adoption
With no changes in the agenda, Council should adopt and work
from the pink agenda already printed.
8.h. Lexington/110 Appraisal Quotes
Attached is a follow up letter from Blake Davis, amending his
proposal to add the cost of appraising the equipment and
personal property in the two businesses. Such appraisal
would be necessary for the SOS store, but not needed for the
Curley Furniture Library. Therefore, the respective quotes
would be: Blake Davis - $2,200; Penfield - $2,140.
Croix oil has indicated that, if the project ultimately
proceeds, they would be willing to reimburse the City for the
cost of the appraisal on the SOS site. John Duffy has also
indicated a willingness to participate in the cost of the
appraisal for the Curley property.
8.1. Airport Runway Extension
MASAC representative Bernie Friel has some additional
comments that he recommends be added to the letter in your
agenda packet. Larry Shaughnessy will have a copy of
Bernie's comments at the meeting.
DAVIS& LAGERMAN, INC.
218 ENDICOTT ON 4th STREET
111HU.W SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55 101
Tclephone:(6121293-1551
PEALICIP
CHANDLEn 9 DAVIS. U A I
nt AXES DAVIS M A I
December 1.3, 1988
Mr. Larry Shaughnessy
City of Mendota Heights
750 co. Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
R171: Supplementary Fee
Two Parcels
Southeast Corner
Dear Mr. Shaughnessy:
Quotation
Highway 110 & Lexington
When I originally quoted you a fee to appraise the above
two parcels I assumed that no personal property or equip-
ment used in the businesses would be included in my val-
uations. You have since instructed me that such personal
property and equipment will, in deed, be included in the
valuation process. I am writing this lette , r to amend my
fee quotation to include items of personal property and
equipment. My valuations still would include no inventory
and no value, if any, for the businesses which are operating
on the premises.
With respect to the convenience store the fee would increase
by $300 to $1,500 to allow for valuing the personal prop-
erty and equipment. With respect to the furniture library
the fec would increase by $150 to $850. The total fee for
the two of them including land, buildings, personal property,
and equipment will, therefore, be $2,350.
If there is additional information
with regard to this matter, please
touch with me at any time.
Yours very truly,
so
Blake S. Davis, MAI
BSI)/ns
which You will require
feel free to get in
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 15, 1988
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mary Ann DeLaRosa, Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT: Reminder of Starting Time for Council Meeting
Please remember that the December 20 Council meeting
will begin at 8:00 P.M., rather than the normal time of 7:30.
This is due to the School District's levy referendum being
conducted on that date.
madlr
It appears that the proposed runway extension will result in
increased use of runway 29R/11L. Operations on this runway have a
serious detrimental effect on our City residents. The failure to
direct traffic in the area of the City, south of a 105.degree
heading, which has been zoned to accept aircraft traffic, is
inexcusable and should be reflected in the EIS. Furthermore, we
believe the failure to provide an EAW with respect to the movement of
flight tracks to the north, off 29L/11R may be actionable. Although
we have inquired of the FAA, we have not received satisfactory
answers to our questions regarding the lack of an EAW.
Page No. 2415
November 1, 1988
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, November 1, 1988
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the
City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock
P.M. at the Fire Station, 2121 Dodd Road, Mendota Heights,
Minnesota.
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto,
Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins Hartmann and Witt.
AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of
the revised agenda for the meeting,
removing items g though j from the consent
calendar.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the
consent calendar for the meeting, including
authorization for execution of all
necessary documents contained therein.
a. Acknowledgment of the Code Enforcement
monthly report for October.
b. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the
October 25th Planning Commission
meeting.
c. Approval of the issuance of a temporary
on -sale 3.2 malt beverage license to
St. Peter's Church in connection with
its winter party on January 21, 1989
from 5:30 to 7:30 P.M.,
d. Approval of a request from Police Chief
Delmont for authorization to apply for
a State matching grant for Crime
Prevention.
e. Approval of the list of contractor
licenses dated November 1, 1988 and
attached hereto.
Page No. 2416
November 1, 1988
f. Approval of the List of Claims dated
November 1, 1988 and totalling
$254,971.66.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
STOP SIGN REQUEST Council acknowledged a request from Mr.
Vern Gunderson, 1916 Walsh Lane, for stop
or yield signs on Walsh Lane, along with an
associated memo from Public Works Director
Danielson.
Councilmember Cummins felt that the request
is similar to the Copperfield area request,
and that if stop signs were placed as
requested, it would make Walsh Lane more of
a through street. He stated that unless
the Police Department gives some indication
that the current conditions are unsafe, he
believes the intersections with Walsh would
be better off un -signed.
Councilmember Blesener felt that if any
signage should occur, it should be a four
way stop at Stratford and Walsh.
The matter was referred to the Police
Department for report and -recommendation,
especially relating the 4 -way stop
suggestion.
WAGON WHEEL Council acknowledged a report from Public
TRAIL REQUEST Works Director Danielson regarding the
requests for a trail along Wagon Wheel
Trail which had been referred to him on
October 18th. In the report, Mr. Danielson
suggested three options: to wait until MSA
construction of Wagon Wheel occurs, as this
upgrading includes a trail; to wait until
after the park referendum has been held;
and to widen the shoulder in 1989, using
Special Park Fund monies.
Mayor Mertensotto felt that the trail
construction should wait until the MSA
project, and that the project should be
advanced on the MSA project schedule. He
did not feel it would be appropriate to
expend Park Fund monies when MSA will
finance the construction as part of the
upgrade project.
Page No. 2417
November 1, 1988
Councilmember Cummins felt that in any
event it should be laid over until the park
study group has a chance to comment and
make a recommendation on the matter.
Councilmember Hartmann agreed, and also
suggested that the project be advanced in
the MSA schedule.
Public Works Director Danielson informed
Council that it would be two or three years
minimum before the project could be
completed via MSA but that it would be
possible to bond for the project and do it
earlier.
Treasurer Shaughnessy concurred that the
City could bond for the project because the
City's MSA bonds are nearly paid off and
the City has a considerable amount of
bonding authority.
Mayor Mertensotto suggested that Council
review the MSA program to determine where
this project would fit in the priorities
and try to get the Wagon Wheel
reconstruction done within the next two
years.
Councilmembers Blesener and Witt felt that
Wagon Wheel must be a part of the City's
trails program.
Council directed that Public Works Director
Danielson prepare a follow-up report on the
options for consideration just after the
first of the year.
LIQUOR STORE HOURS Council acknowledged a memo from the City
Clerk regarding a request from MGM Liquors
for an ordinance amendment to allow their
facility to remain open until 10:00 P.M. on
the day before Thanksgiving, as is
permissible under state statute.
Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of
Ordinance No. 259, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 209 (Codified as Ordinance
No. 1403)," as amended to clarify the
titles of each category of license.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 2418
November 1, 1988
EQUIPMENT PURCHASE Councilmember Blesener moved to authorize
issuance of a purchase order to Dodd
Technical for $2,616 for a Hewlett Packard
Series II laser printer and 2 megabyte
expansion board.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0 r
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
RUBBISH SERVICE Council acknowledged a report from the City
Administrator regarding rubbish service for
new City Hall along with proposals from
Knutson Rubbish Service, Inc., Mendota
Heights Rubbish, B.F.I., and Roadway/Eagan
Sanitation.
After discussion, Councilmember Cummins
moved that the contract for rubbish service
for new City Hall be awarded to Knutson
Rubbish Service, Inc., for $24.62 per
month, in accordance with their proposal
dated October 18, 1988.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
JANITORIAL SERVICE Council accepted proposals for City Hall
janitorial service from Lee's Janitorial
Service, for $760.50 per month for 3 days
per week and $1170 per month for 5 days per
week, and from C-Tak for $880/ month for
three days per week and $1,295 for 5 day
per week service.
Councilmember Witt moved to accept the .
proposal of Lee's Janitorial Service for 3 -
day per week service for new City Hall.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CASE NO. 88-43, Councilmember Cummins moved to approve a
THOMEY VARIANCE five foot front yard setback variance for
2030 Dodd Road (Amoco Station) tb allow
construction of a gas pump canopy fifteen
feet from the front property line along
with approval of the associated building
permit.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 2419
: November 1, 1988
CASE NO. 88-44, Mr. Fred Haas, from Marvin Anderson
MARVIN ANDERSON Construction, was present to request
approval of variances to allow entrance
monuments for the Bridgeview Shores
Development. Mr. Haas informed Council
that the Planning Commission had
recommended denial of their original plan,
which has since been modified.
Mr. Haas stated that the application before
the Planning Commission was for an
elaborate sign at Bridgeview Court, the
main entrance to the Bridgeview Shores
subdivision, and a pillar at every other
intersection. After reading the
recommendation that pillars at the
intersections would segment the community,
his firm decided to only request approval
of the one 23 1/2 square foot sign
supported by 5 foot tall posts to serve as
an entrance monument at Bridgeview Court
and Mendota Heights Road, without the
originally proposed fences. He stated that
the monument would be maintenance -proof
masonry and concrete, and would not be
lighted. He stated that this one structure
at the main entrance to the Addition would
identify the area and be something
permanent.
Mayor Mertensotto raised the Planning
Commission concern that the monument's
purpose is for advertising.
Mr. Haas responded that the 8 by 16 foot
monument at Victoria Highlands is masonry
and is permanent and the Park Place
monuments, 5 foot high posts with 5 by 2
signs, are also permanent. He stated that
it is true that the monument is a marketing
item but that this is also true of the
Victoria Highlands and Park Place
monuments. He informed Council that the
sign would be at placed at a 45 degree
angle to the intersection and will be set
back far enough that there will be no
visibility problem on the corner. He
further stated that evergreens and shrubs
will be planted around the monument and
that the owner of the adjoining lot will
maintain the shrubs. The structure will be
off of Mendota Heights Road, in front of
Page No. 2420
November 1, 1988
the berm and about a foot above the curb,
24 feet from the curb.
Councilmember Cummins stated that he has no
problem with the request, and that if one
were to drive around the community you
would see distinguishing signs in many of
the neighborhoods. He felt that it is a
well-designed sign.
Councilmember Blesener agreed, pointing out
that the precedent for such signage has
been set all over the City. She expressed
concern over the scale of the sign, and
that the mass of it might cause visibility
problems.
Mr. Haas suggested that the site distance
could be checked by the Public Works
Director prior to installation so that
there is no conflict of site distance. He
informed Council that the monument will be
on private property and there will be a
covenant on that lot stipulating that the
homeowners must maintain the monument.
Councilmember Hartmann asked what would
happen if the property owner does not take
care of it.
Mr. Haas responded that given the price of
these homes there should be no problem:
people will take care of their properties.
He further stated that if that ever
happened and it became a problem for the
City, his firm will remove the monument.
Mayor Mertensotto asked Mr. Haas if he will
give the City a letter guaranteeing that
his firm will covenant that the monument
will be on private property, that the
homeowners will take care of it, and that
if it is not maintained and ever becomes a
problem or a safety hazard his firm will
remove it.
Mr. Haas responded that he will provide the
guarantee. He asked that the City Engineer
check the proposed location of the monument
to be sure it is placed for adequate sight
distance.
Attorney Tom Hart stated that the guarantee
letter should stipulate that the City
Page No. 2421
November 1, 1988
should be the party to decide whether the
monument has become a safety hazard.
Councilmember Cummins moved to approve the
requested variance for the placement of a
23 1/2 square foot sign supported by two 5
foot tall posts, to be placed two feet from
the property line at the corner of
Bridgeview Court and Mendota Heights Road,
subject to receipt of a letter of
undertaking from Marvin Anderson Homes (to
be approved by staff prior to permit
issuance) stipulating that if the monument
becomes a safety hazard as determined by
Council or if it is not properly maintained
by the property owner Marvin Anderson Homes
will remove it within 30 days.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CASE NO. 88-45 Mr. Chuck Partridge and his surveyor, Mr.
PARTRIDGE Paul McGinley, were present to request
approval of a 16 foot front yard setback
variance and wetlands permit to allow
construction of a home at 709 Wentworth.
After brief discussion, Councilmember Witt
moved approval of a 16 foot front yard
setback variance, along with waiver of the
wetlands permit public hearing requirement
and approval of a five foot variance from
the wetlands setback requirement, to allow
construction of a home at 709 Wentworth
Avenue in accordance with the site plan
dated October 14, 1988.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CURLEY ADDITION TOT LOT Mr. Dave Ayers and Dr. Frank Pilney were
present regarding play structures for the
Curley Addition tot lot.
Mr. Ayers requested Council to approve one
of two playground structures. The first
proposal would be for a very high quality
redwood 6 by 6 construction at a cost of
$6,700. The second proposal would be four
by four treated pine construction at a
cost of $4,055. Mr. Ayers stated that the
second structure is not as high quality as
the first and is not as attractive. He
informed Council of the differences between
Page No. 2422
November 1, 1988
the structures and stated that the second
structure would be adequate for the area's
needs, as it is typically constructed in a
campground or daycare area but not in a
public park. He recommended the $6,700
single -unit structure rather than the two-
piece $4,000 structure. Mr. Ayers asked
for approval of an additional $2,700 in
funding from the City, and pointed out that
the initial Park Commission recommendation
was $14,000 for the project.
Responding to a question from Councilmember
Blesener, Mr. Ayers stated that the
structure proposed is very similar to that
in Rogers Lake Park.
Mayor Mertensotto felt that redwood
construction is definitely better than
treated pine and pointed out that no quotes
were available to Council at the time it
established the $4,000 funding figure.
Mr. Ayers stated that the quotation is from
Rainbow and is a very good price. Adminis-
trator Frazell stated that written
quotations from the vendors are necessary.
After additional discussion, Councilmember
Blesener moved to amend the original budget
for the Curley tot lot play structure from
$4,000 to $6,700 to provide for the
purchase of a Rainbow play structure as
requested.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 1 Witt
Mr. Ayers was directed to get written
quotations from the vendors who had given
him proposals.
PARK REVIEW
Council discussed the size and composition
COMMITTEE
of the proposed Parks Review Committee. It
was the consensus that it should be a
twelve member committee consisting of two
Councilmembers, 2 Planning Commission and 3
Park Commission members, to be nominated by
the Commissions, and five at -large members.
It was also the consensus that each
Councilmember should nominate one at -large
representative, with the appointment of the
Committee to occur at the December 6th
Council meeting.
Page No. 2423
November 1, 1988
CANVASSING BOARD It was the consensus of Council that the
Election Canvassing Board convene at 5:00
P.M. on November 9th at the Fire Station.
Councilmember Cummins informed Council that
he will be out of town and unable to
attend.
LEXINGTON/110 Councilmember Blesener moved to schedule a
joint Council/Planning Commission workshop
on November 29th at 7:00 P.M. to review
planning and finance issues relating to the
proposed development of the Curley/SOS
properties.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
COUNCIL COMMENTS Council acknowledged a letter from William
Mulvihill relative to sale of the Mulvihill
family property to the City. Administrator
Frazell was directed to respond.
ADJOURN There being no further business to come
before the Council, Councilmember Hartmann
moved to adjourn the meeting to the
November 9th Canvassing Board meeting.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:16 O'Clock P.M.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
ON NOVEMBER 1, 1988
Concrete Licenses:
Serice, Inc.
Steenberg-Watrud Construction
Excavating License:
American Excavating, Inc.
Gas Piping License:
Thompson Plumbing, Inc.
General Contractor Licenses:.
Creative Spaces
Linrod Custom Homes, Inc.
Theis Construction Company
Heating & Air Conditioning License:
GenErik Heating & Cooling, Inc.
I
Page No.
November 9, 1988
CITY.OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Election Canvassing Board Meeting
Held Wednesday, November 9, 1988
Pursuant to due•call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of
the City Council, meeting as the Election Canvass Board, was held
at 5:00 o'clock P.M. at the Fire Station, 2121 Dodd Road, Mendota
Heights, Minnesota.
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 5:08 o'clock P.M.
The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto,
Councilmembers Blesener, Hartmann and Witt. Councilmember Cummins
had notified the Council that he would be absent.
The City Council, acting in its capacity as Election Canvassing
board, accepted the results of the casting and canvass of votes in
the November 8, 1988 General and city Election, as presented by
the City Clerk, and as follows:
MAYOR
Charles E. Mertensotto
Write -Ins:
Undervotes
Overvotes
Total
CITY COUNCIL
Janet B. Blesener
Carl Cummins III
Bernard P. Friel
Christine M. Koch
Write -Ins:
Undervotes
Overvotes
Total
Pct. 1 Pct. 2 Pct. 3 Pct. 4 Pct. 5 Pct. 6 Total
827
837
760
622•
815
346
4.207
18
29
19
13
14
7
100
248
243
233
212
220
93
1,249
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,093
1,109
1,012
847
1,049
446
5,556
511
435
515
343
512
202
2,518
404
493
423
354
467
193
2,334
386
593
387
316
348
160
2,190
412
325
360
289
373
175
1,934
0
3
1
2
8
5
19
473
367
338
390
390
157
2,115
0
.2
0
0
0
0
2
2,186
.2,218
2,024
1,694
2,098
892
11,112
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Page No.
November 9, 1988
Councilmember Witt moved that the Canvassing Board find that
,Tan Blesener and Carl Cummins III are elected to the City
Council for four-year terms and that Charles E. Mertensotto
is elected Mayor for a two-year term. Councilmember Hartmann
seconded the motion.
Councilmember Hartmann moved that the meeting of the Election
Canvassing Board be adjourned.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 5:15 O'clock.P.M.
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor ,
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
Page No. 2423
November 15, 1988
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA'
3
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, November 15, 1988
�x
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the 1
City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held'at 7:30 o'clock F %�
P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria:Curve, Mendota''Heights, Minnesota.
'�j• p
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. a
The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto,
Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins; Hartmann and Witt.
AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of
the agenda for the meeting, as amended to
move item 4c, fire station street light
request, to item 8b, and including
additional items contained in the add-on
agenda.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Blesener moved approval of
the consent calendar for the meeting, as
amended to remove City Hall contractor
payments.
a. Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's
monthly report for October.
b. Adoption of Resolution No. 88-89,
"RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT DIVISION IN
THE VICTORIA HIGHLANDS 2ND ADDITION."
c. Approval of the list of licenses dated
November 15, 1988 and attached hereto.
d. Approval of the List of Claims dated
November 15, 1988 and totalling
$440,223.49.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CORNICK WATERMAIN The Council acknowledged receipt of a
tabulation of bids received for
construction of the proposed watermain and
storm sewer extension to serve the Cornick ;
'� s
Page No. 2424
November 15, 1988
residence at 1176 Sibley Memorial Highway
and adjacent areas.
Councilmember Blesener asked whether the
CDBG funding for the project is in place.
Public Works Director Danielson responded
that the existing funding nearly covers the
project and that he is working on getting
additional funds from the City's 1989 CDBG
allotment:
Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of
Resolution No. 88-90, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF WATER AND STORM SEWER EXTENSION TO SERVE
1176 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY AND ADJACENT
AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO. 6),"
awarding the contract to F.M. Frattalone
Excavating and Grading for its low bid of
$53,666.00.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
EAGAN DEVELOPMENT Mr. John Shardlow, from Dahlgren, Shardlow
and Uban, a consultant for Northwest
Airlines, was present to review plans for
the proposed development of the Laukka Beck
properties on T.H. 149 at I-494 in Eagan.
Mr. Shardlow stated that Laukka Beck
recently sold 113 acres of land to
Northwest, making the total Northwest
ownership 190 acres of land in this area.
He informed Council that Laukka also sold a
very large parcel to Wacovia Bank who in
turn sold some of its parcel to Cray
Research, which plans to build a 60,000
square foot structure southeast of I-494 at
Dodd on Lone Oak Road. He stated that
Northwest plans to construct two 250,000
square foot buildings on its site (in
addition to its existing building). Mr.
Shardlow informed Council that there is the
need to accommodate nearly one million more
square footage on the Laukka Beck site than
what was originally authorized by the City
of Eagan in the planned unit development
for the property, and that the master plan
for Northwest includes a major computer
center, hotel and additional training
facility.
Page No. 2425
November 15, 1988
Mr. Shardlow showed Council slides
depicting the site and the proposed
development. He informed Council that the
PUD was approved by Eagan in 1985 and a
full environmental impact statement was
completed at that time which anticipated
that up to one million square feet of
additional development could be put on the
site but indicated there could be traffic
problems with the site. He stated that the
firm BRW has completed a traffic study
which focused.on solving the traffic
problems caused by the Northwest site and
that Dakota County and the City of Eagan
have hired Short -Elliot -Hendrickson to
prepare a major traffic study throughout
the County and also throughout Eagan. He
reviewed the proposals from BRW which
include adding turn lanes throughout the
Lone Oak PUD area and acceleration lanes,
and stated that I-494 is a key area of
restriction. He stated that the key
ingredients of the traffic plan that really
are a catalyst to being able to accommodate
the PUD amendment have an affect on Mendota
Heights. These proposals include a high
occupancy vehicle lane only, which could
have access into Mendota Heights if
desired, and a proposed direct on-ramp from
T.H.49 over to I -35E, which would take a
great deal of land from Visitation Convent.
Mr. Shardlow informed Council that the City
of Eagan is considering doing a very large
development district and to amend its
comprehensive plan.
Mayor Mertensotto expressed his concern
about the alternate solution as it impacts
Mendota Heights, in particular the
potential link that would take some of the
Visitation property and also some
residential properties. He asked how much
land would be taken under such a proposal.
Mr. Shardlow responded that he is in the
process of fine tuning the details and does
not have exact figures, but that the BRW
plan indicates that a great deal of land
would be taken. He also stated that the
existing traffic volumes on Dodd are
projected to quadruple and only 9% of that
volume would be from this development.
Responding to a question from Councilmember
Blesener over why a full cloverleaf is not
w
Page No. 2426
November 15, 1988
proposed, Mr. Shardlow stated that such a
solution would take more Visitation
property.
Councilmember Blesener stated that what is
proposed would force everyone to make a
left turn to get onto 35E, and she asked
whether there is anything in the study that
would discourage traffic from turning north
on Dodd, some road design that would make
it more undesirable to turn north.
Mr. Shardlow responded that Eagan has
required Northwest to agree to a very
stringent traffic management plan including
staggered work hours, van pooling, etc.
Mayor Mertensotto asked whether
consideration had been given to bringing
some of the traffic back to T.H. 55 to get
to I -35E, creating an access point to T.H.
55 for Northwest. He informed Mr. Shardlow
that the Council would never want to
entertain bringing the traffic from the
Laukka-Beck site over to Mendota Heights
Mr. Shardlow stated that the idea of an
access point at T.H. 55 has not been
brought up but that it is a good idea.
Mayor Mertensotto informed Mr. Shardlow
that the Council wants to be kept abreast
of proposals while they are in the
preliminary stage so that Council is not
limited in its ability to comment.
Regarding a question from Administrator
Frazell on the timing of public hearings
for the EIS or tax increment plan, Mr.
Shardlow stated that it will be January or
February before the specific tax increment
district is formed and probably March
before the PUD is approved. He indicated
that he will report back to Council as soon
as he can.
STREET LIGHT REQUESTS Council acknowledged a letter from Centex
Homes requesting approval to install NSP
street lights in the Kensington plat and a
request from Fire Chief Maczko for
installation of an NSP street light at the
north entrance to the fire station.
~� � « r e.
Page No. 2427
November 15, 1988
Mr. Kevin Clark, from Centex, stated that
the Kensington project is more dense than
most developments in the City, there will
be people waiting for buses, more traffic
and people coming to use the park
facilities, and it made sense to his firm
to request street lights for security and
safety purposes.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that United
Properties asked for lights for the
industrial park that would beautify the
area and expressed concern that Council
should adopt a residential light standard
to provide uniformity in the community
before approving any street lights.
Councilmember Blesener agreed and felt that
Council should look at what types of lights
are available and then come up with a
policy. She stated that the Council needs
to establish a light standard but not the
overhead NSP light.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that what might
be lost in terms of aesthetics (NSP
lights), might result in a gain in terms of
the City not having to maintain the lights.
Councilmember Cummins stated that he does
not wish to have the city lose its semi -
rural character and suggested that Council
should approach the issue in a more
organized way.
Councilmember Blesener suggested that the
requests be tabled until Council adopts a
policy and further, that Council should set
a higher priority on developing a policy.
Administrator Frazell stated that staff can
start to frame the issue and make a
presentation on what types of lights are
available. He asked whether it is
Council's feeling that the costs for
maintenance be paid by the residents and
further that Council must decide what
percentage of a neighborhood must petition
for lights.
Mayor Mertensotto suggested that
residential lights installation be
assessed. Councilmember Blesener pointed
out that there should be a different light
Page No. 2428
November 15, 1988
standard for arterial streets and
neighborhoods.
Action on the Centex and Fire Department
requests was tabled for further review.
AIRPORT ADEQUACY Metropolitan Council Representative Mary
Martin gave the Council a presentation on
the report and recommendations of the
Metropolitan Council's Airport Adequacy
Task Force regarding the future of the
Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Ms. Martin
has indicated that the far parallel runway
was not recommended by the Task Force. He
felt that if this is not intended to be
recommended, it should have been so noted
in the report.
Councilmember Cummins, a member of the Task
Force, stated that he believes the
committee came up with a very practical and
palatable solution. He stated that if
traffic projections are not as high as the
studies indicate it may not be enough to
justify a new airport, but it may be enough
that the airport will need to go beyond the
north/south runway. He pointed out that
the recommendation is just short of
building a new airport. He stated that it
would be 15 years before construction could
begin on a new airport if the decision to
build were made today.
Mayor Mertensotto informed Ms. Martin that
the Council has no basic objection to the
approach being taken but does have many
questions as to how improvements on the
airport would affect conditions in Mendota
Heights.
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION Council acknowledged a proposed Affirmative
Action Plan prepared by the City
Administrator.
Councilmember Witt moved approval of the
draft Affirmative Action Plan dated
December 1, 1988 and authorization for its
submission to the Department of Human
taw• - _• ..� M �.�... � ��
Page No. 2429
November 15, 1988
Rights.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
ADMINISTRATIVE Council acknowledged a memo from Adminis-
ASSISTANT trator Frazell regarding the Administrative
Assistant selection process.
Councilmember Cummins moved that
Councilmember Witt be designated to serve
as the Council's participant on the
Administrative Assistant interview panel.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
WORKSHOP Councilmember Blesener moved that Council
meet at 6:45 P.M. on December 6th to
conduct the City Administrator's
performance evaluation and salary
discussion.'
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CITY HALL PAYMENTS It was noted that these items, 4f and 4g of
the consent calendar, applications for
payment from the City Hall mechanical and
general contractors, had been removed by
Council for discussion.
Mayor Mertensotto noted that there are
several outstanding corrections to be made
in the City Hall structure and that it is
his preference that action on the payment
requests be tabled.
It was Council consensus that the payment
consideration be tabled to the next meeting
and that summary report as -to the condition
of the structure be submitted to Council.
COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Blesener asked how much it
would cost to remove the old fire station
and what alternative uses there might be.
Staff was directed to prepare a response,
for the December 6th meeting if possible.
Councilmember Blesener suggested that
Council address the issue of whether a
developer is in a position to petition for
street lights for people who will
ultimately live in the neighborhoods.
Page No. 2430
November 15, 1988
Councilmember Cummins asked that staff
prepare a policy on use of the Council
Chambers by neighborhood groups.
ADJOURN There being no further business to come
before Council, Councilmember Hartmann
moved that the meeting be adjourned.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:01 P.M.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
ON NOVEMBER 15, 1988
Asphalt License:
Dakota Blacktopping
Excavating License:
S.R. Stevens..Excavating
Gas Piping License:
Red Wing Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.
General Contractor Licenses:
Axel Ohman, Inc.
Brian L. Thorson Homes, Inc.
D.J. Kranz Construction, Inc.
Northern Fire Protection, Inc.
Twin City Design
November 29, 1988
Page 1
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Joint Workshop
Held Tuesday, November 29, 1988
Meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Charles
Mertensotto. The following members were present: Mayor
Mertensotto, Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins, Hartmann and
Witt. Also present were Planning Commission members
Anderson, Burke, Duggan, Dwyer, Krebsbach, McMonigal and
Morson. City staff included City Administrator Kevin
Frazell, Public Works Director Jim Danielson, Treasurer Larry
Shaughnessy, and Planner Howard Dahlgren. Others present
were developer John Duffy, Bob Fields and John Ogren from
Croix oil, Tom Harley, attorney for Curley family, Tim Curley
and the two owners of the SOS Convenience Station, Joan Kasa
and Deede Schmidt.
APPROVAL OF
City Administrator Frazell reported on
CITY HALL
his recent discussions with the City Hall
PAYMENTS
contractors and architects concerning
deficiencies of water runoff in some
areas around the city hall. Council
noted receipt of a letter from architect
Bob Pierce recommending that the
currently due payment to Joseph
Construction be made. Frazell added that
it seems there are sufficient funds left
in retainage for both the city hall
general and mechanical contractor
payments to cover correction of any
deficiencies.
Motion by Councilmember Cummins, seconded
by Councilmember Witt to approve the
current amount due to Joseph Construction
Company of $51,841.31, and to Doody
Mechanical in the amount of $11,447.50.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
JOINT COUNCIL/ City Treasurer Larry Shaughnessy
PLANNING DIS- presented and discussed his memorandum of
CUSSION ON November 25, regarding estimated costs of
PROPOSED acquisition, demolition and sell -back of
DEVELOPMENT the land involved in the Lexington/110
OF LEXINGTON/ redevelopment. A copy of that memo is
TH 110 AREA attached and made a part of these
FINANCIAL minutes.
ISSUES
Croix Oil representative Robert Fields
indicated that they had sent a purchase
November 29, 1988
Page 2
offer to the SOS station of $140,000,
plus having Croix cover the cost up to
$40,000 for clean up of the site. Fields
said the offer was contingent on soil
tests of the property indicating that
$40,000 would be sufficient for any
contamination clean up.
There was then general discussion about
alternative ways that the City might
invest tax increment dollars in promoting
the development. Fields suggested that
if Croix Oil could enter a friendly
purchase with the SOS owners, it would
greatly simplify the proceedings of
acquiring and redeveloping the SOS site.
He said that the City could then put its
tax increment dollars into the project
in alternative ways.
Developer Duffy indicated that he would
provide a pro forma on the project for
City analysis.
There was then discussion about
dedication and construction of the
required service road. It was noted that
Mn/DOT normally builds the service roads,
but looks to the developer or City for
dedication of the right-of-way. City
Planner Howard Dahlgren noted that this
proposal would correct a significant
safety problem. Public Works Director
Jim Danielson mentioned that the County
intends to upgrade the Lexington/110
intersection in 1991, and that turn lanes
and an improved signal system would be
part of the improvements.
PLANNING
ISSUES Developer Duffy presented the original
proposal for site development, along with
an amendment labeled as alternative 1.
Copies of the plan are attached and made
a part of these minutes. Duffy indicated
that alternative 1 brings the shopping
center closer to Lexington Avenue, and
intrudes less on the residential
neighborhood to the south. The shopping
center itself is extended further to the
west, as an alternative to an independent
restaurant site.
It was noted that the developer proposes
to use the same brick in the SuperAmerica
a�
i
s;
November 29, 1988
Page 3
convenience store as has been used on the
city hall at the northwest corner of the
110/Lexington intersection. A mansard
roof sign band would be placed around the
convenience store.
The development proposes five parking
spaces per 1,000 feet of development,
versus the seven required in the Code.
City Planner Dahlgren agreed that a
requirement of five is fairly standard in
the metropolitan area now and should be
adequate for the development.
For the benefit of the Planning
Commission, City Administrator Frazell
gave a brief overview of Council action
and consideration on the proposed
development to,date. He reported that
originally the Council had been adamantly
opposed to a convenience store with gas
pumps station at the intersection.
However, a subsequent market analysis by
the Maxfield Research Group had indicated
that such an anchor tenant is highly
critical to the success of the nearby
shopping center. Frazell said that this,
coupled with the relatively attractive
design which had been presented by Croix
Oil, caused the Council to be willing to
entertain the proposal further.
Councilmember Blesener responded that she
felt there was a real value to the
community in having a nice shopping
center in this area, but that it was
important to set a good tone in that this
is the first commercial area people see
when they come into the City from the
west.
Duffy said that 66% of the center was
pre -leased, and that for the most part it
is for a different type of tenant than
those at Mendota Plaza. This development
would have smaller, faster -paced tenants,
and higher lease rates.
John Ogren of Croix Oil presented the
model of the type of SuperAmerica station
they would build. It included a canopy
bay with 18 gasoline dispensing hoses,
and nine dispensing units.
November 29, 1988
Page 4
Planning Chair Jerry Morson asked the
developer if he had planned any
neighborhood meetings so that neighbors
could become familiar with the
development prior to formal City
consideration. Duffy responded that he
would be willing to hold such a meeting.
There seemed to be a general concensus of
the Council and Commission that they did
not want to see a large gas pump canopy
oriented toward the road and as a
prominent feature of the site.
Commissioner Sandra Krebsbach offered
that she felt the scale was simply too
big, and was out of character with the
surrounding neighborhoods.
Councilmember Buzz Cummins indicated that
he did not feel this corner was really a
"quiet" area of the City, and if the
center was well designed it could be
welcomed by nearby neighbors. He too
felt that the canopy should be moved and
scaled more to service the surrounding
area.
Councilmember Jann Blesener said that she
felt a good convenience store is needed
in this area, but was disturbed by the
scale and scope of the proposed
development. John Ogren said that he
felt people want to go to a station that
looks like it is easy to get in and out
of, and that is the reason for proposing
18 pumps.
City Planner Howard Dahlgren then made a
few brief comments on the proposal.
First, he indicated that it was important
that city officials see this as an
opportunity to clean up an area that is a
real eye sore for the community.
He drew attention to the proposed
commercial zoning line. In the case of a
B-3 district, it is required that there
be a 75 foot setback from any abutting
residential district. Since it will be
difficult to respect that setback
requirement in this area, he said that
much care must be taken for the
transition from the commercial to the
residential district.
November 29, 1988
Page 5
Dahlgren said that Mendota Plaza had been
designed for larger shops, and that the
current proposal was of a more shallow
depth and would attract a different type
of shop and market.
As an alternative, Dahlgren suggested
bending the shopping center somewhat to
the south as it approaches Lexington
Avenue. With regard to the filling
station pumps, he reported on a Mobil
station that his company had designed at
Normandale and 84th Street in
Bloomington, in which the pumps were to
the rear of the street. He added that
the layout had worked well, and it was a
very successful service station.
It was agreed that the owners of Curley's
and the SOS could meet with City
Treasurer Larry Shaughnessy to discuss
more specifically the acquisition costs
for the development.
ADJOURN There being no further discussion,
Councilmember Witt moved that the meeting
be adjourned.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the
motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:40 P.M.
Kevin D. Frazell
City Administrator
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mer enso o
Mayor
4
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
TREASURER'S REPORT, NOVEMBER, 1988
BALANCE COLLATERAL
DAKOTA COUNTY STATE BANK
Checking Account 5% $ 15,025.45
Savings Account 5 1/2% 465.68
C.D. Repo 10/5 7.15% 85,000.00
$ 100,491.13
Collateral - Bonds 360,000.00
Gov't. Guar. 100,000.00
240,000.00 $700,000.00
CHEROKEE STATE BANK
C.D. due 12-12-88 @ 7.75% $350,000.00
Savings Cert. 2-29-89 @ 13,952.59
6.28%
$363,952.59
Collateral - Bonds 700,000.00
Gov't. Guar. 100,000.00 800,000.00
U.S. TREASURY BILLS
July 6, 1989 7.90 (1mm) 928,897.50
$ 928,897.50
Value 11/30/88
est.
U.S. Treasury Money Mkt. Fund (7.98) $1,200,000 ($1,270,000)
GOVT, SECURITIES FUND, 10.7% $1,200,000 ($1,467,000)
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $3,793,341.22
Funds Available 12-31-87 $5,023,364.15
Funds Available 11/39-87
3,398,520.00
Increased balance primarily due to increases in G.F. TI
District, Engineering Fund and unexpended bond funds.
Rates, Money Market
Nov. 30 Bank 7.20
LES:madlr Fid. 7.97
12-8-88 4M 7.83
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
WRE4
December 12, 1988
TO: Mayor, City Council, CityAVt)atori
."
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Stop Sign Ordinande Amendment
INTRODUCTION
At the December 1st meeting, Council referred the matter
of stop signs along Walsh Lane to the Police Chief for
recommendation. The purpose of this memo is to inform
Council of that recommendation and to also ask for Council
authorization for stop signs in the Bridgeview Shores
Addition.
RECOMMENDATION
Chief Delmont recommends that a stop sign be installed
on Stratford Road at its intersection with Walsh Lane.
Public Works Director Danielson has informed me that signs
have not yet been authorized in the Bridgeview Shores
Addition and recommends that signs be placed on Bridgeview
Court, Mendota Heights Circle and Pond Haven Lane at their
intersections with Mendota Heights Road. A proposed
ordinance amendment is attached for council consideration.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs in the recommendations
Delmont and Public Works Director Danielson, it
the attached proposed ordinance, "An Ordinance
Ordinance No. 1113.11
of Chief
should adopt
Amending
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1113
The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota,
ordains as follows:
SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 1113, known and referred to as "An
Ordinance Establishing Stop and Yield Intersections Within The
City of Mendota Heights," is hereby amended in the following
respects:
The following streets are hereby added to Section 1 of said
Ordinance, "THROUGH STREETS AND STOP INTERSECTIONS,"
Through Streets
Mendota Heights Road
Mendota Heights Road
Mendota Heights Road
Walsh Lane
Stop Streets
Bridgeview Court
Mendota Heights Circle
Pond Haven Lane
Stratford Road
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its publication according to law.
Adopted and ordained into an Ordinance this 20th day of December
1988.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
DECEMBER 8, 1988
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. F; ity Administrator
SUBJECT: Fur her Time Extension Addendum to Kensington PUD
Developer's Agreement
On December 21, 1987, the City Council approved a
developer's agreement for the Kensington planned unit
development project in southeast Mendota Heights. The
approved plan was referred to as "Plan B", and contemplated
the construction of 500 multi -family residential units. The
agreement gave the City the option of purchasing 35 acres of
community park property for a specified sum of $750,000,
contingent on passage of a bond referendum. As we all know,
the May 3, 1988 referendum subsequently failed at the polls.
The developers agreement also reserved to the City the
unilateral right to cancel the approval of Plan B, upon
passage of a resolution expressing an intent to amend the
comprehensive plan and process planning applications to
consider the alternative Plan A. Plan A is for construction
of 540 multi -family units, and includes the dedication of a
10 acre neighborhood park. The original developers agreement
indicated that such Council action had to take place by
August 31, 1988.
Subsequent to the defeat of the bond referendum, the
developers offered to help the City meet its park objectives
by coming up with yet a third development plan which would
entail the dedication of more park acreage as a part of the
planned unit development. The City Council indicated its
interest and willingness to consider such an alternative, and
the original developers agreement was amended to extend until
December 31, 1988, the time for the Council to act on
amending its comprehensive plan and a PUD approval. However,
the developers did not actively pursue their plans during the
Fall months.
Staff has recently met with the developers, Centex
Homes, and they have indicated their remaining interest in
pursuing the third alternative. In fact, current plans are
that they will file their application materials in time for
consideration by the Planning Commission at its January 24
meeting. This will also allow time for the Citizens Parks
Review Committee to consider this alternative, and how it
might fit into an overall park development plan for the
community.
In order to "buy time" an additional extension agreement
to the original developers agreement is necessary. Attached
is a proposed extension agreement, which continues until June
30, 1989, the time frame 1n which the Council may act to
rescind approval of Plan B and substitute an alternative.
Centex President Tom Boyce has indicated that the June 30
time line is acceptable to him.
ACTION REQUIRED
Motion to approve the extension agreement with Centex
Homes extending until June 30, 1989 the time frame in which
the City Council has to amend the original December 22, 1987
developers agreement for the Kensington project.
KDF:madlr
attachment
EXTENSION AGREEMENT
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights (the "City") and Centex
Real Estate Corporation ("Developer") entered into a certain
"Developer's Agreement for a Planned Unit Development Concept
of Kensington Development" dated December 22, 1987 (the
"Developer's,Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 1 of the Developer's
Agreement, the City granted preliminary sketch plan approval
for "Sketch Plan B," as that term is defined in the
Developer's Agreement; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 9 of the Developer's
Agreement, preliminary sketch plan approval of Sketch Plan B
would lapse and be of no further force and effect whatsoever
if, on or prior -to August 31, 1988, the City took certain
steps, including resolution to amend the City's Comprehensive
Plan and granting preliminary sketch plan approval for
"Sketch Plan A," as that term is defined in the Developer's
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Developer, in an Extension
Agreement dated August 2, 1988, extended the time for action
by the City pursuant to paragraph 9 until Deceber 31, 1988;
and
WHEREAS, the,Developer remains interested in presenting to
the City a new alternative sketch plan, distinct from both
Sketch Plan B and Sketch Plan A; and
WHEREAS, the City is willing to entertain and consider the
new sketch plan, conditioned upon extension of the December
31, 1988 deadline set forth in the Extension Agreement of
August 2, 1988.
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and
further in consideration of the Recitals, which are hereby
made a part hereof, it is hereby agreed as follows:
1. Paragraph 9 of the Developer's Agreement shall be
amended to extend the time for action by the City
pursuant to said paragraph from August 31, 1988
until June 30, 1989.
2. Except as otherwise expressly amended hereby, the
Developer's Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect in accordance with its original terms.
Dated:
CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
By
Its President
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Its Mayor
ATTEST
Its City Clerk
■
?AKE�� •
AMEFJCA �
mom
_ United States Department of the Interior
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE M ■t
MIDWEST REGION
1709 JACKSON STREET
IN REPLY REFER To:
OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68102.2571
L58(MWR—R) DEC 71988
Mr. Kevin D. Frazell
Administrator
City of Mendota Heights
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120
Dear Mr. Frazell:
We are pleased to announce that the Mississippi National River and Recreation
Area was established on November 18. With this legislation, the National Park
Service is called upon to provide certain administrative and management
functions. This new park lies within the National Park Service's Midwest
Region, one of 10 such Regional Offices within the Agency. Our Office covers
10 -midwestern States, including Minnesota, and will have the responsibility to
carryout the duties outlined in the enabling legislation.
Congress finds that the Mississippi Corridor within the St. Paul -Minneapolis
Metropolitan Area represents a nationally significant historical, recreational,
scenic, cultural, natural, economic, and scientific resource and that it has a
national interest in the preservation, protection, and enhancement of•these
resources for the benefit of the people of the United States. Congress also
finds that the preservation, enhancement, enjoyment, and utilization of these
resources can be accomplished by a cooperative Federal, State, and local compre-
hensive planning and management effort. w
The overall purpose of the legislation is to protect, preserve, and enhance the
significant values of the waters and lands of the Mississippi River Corridor
within the St. Paul -Minneapolis Metropolitan Area by encouraging coordination of
all Governmental programs and establishing a management framework to assist the E
State of Minnesota and its local units of government in the development and
implementation of an integrated resource management program.
A part of the National Park Service's role will be to assure that the compre-
hensive plan for land and water use measures in the area will be developed by a
22 -member commission.
It may be several months before the commission will be established. However,
the National Park Service will have a physical presence in the area early in the
calendar year, and we look forward to working with all affected units of Govern-
ment, along with commercial and private interests, in the development of this
new addition to the National Park Service.
N
As an interim measure, Mr. Al Hutchings of this Office has been designated as
the National Park Service's keyperson for this effort. Please feel free to
contact Al at 402-221-4855, or me at 402-221-3431 if you wish to discuss any
issues related to the newly established recreation area.
5niy,
Don H. stleberry
Regional Director
Continental Cablevision
December 2, 1988 of Northern Dakota County, Inc.
Kevin Frazell
Mendota Heights City Administrator
750 So. Plaza Dr.
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Frazell:
The purpose of this letter is to inform you of our pending
rate adjustment for our Northern Dakota County cable
television subscribers.
On January 1, 1989, we will adjust our Television Plus rates
upward by $2.55 per month. our costs have increased over the
last twelve months and a rate adjustment is necessary to keep
pace with expenses. For example, our programming costs alone
will increase by more than 30%.
Additionally, the Northern Dakota County market continues to
be a very difficult market to penetrate, both in basic and
premium service penetration. Nonetheless, to maintain a
state of the art cable system we still must incur substantial
expenses. Customer service excellence cannot be attained
cheaply.
However, with the Minnesota state average for basic monthly
service quickly approaching $16.95, our new monthly rate of
$15.50 remains very competitive.
Despite market conditions that constantly bring pressure to
adjust rates even higher, we've managed to provide an
excellent product at a reasonable price. A commitment we've
made to this area and have been able to keep.
We've also provided other significant contributions to
Northern Dakota County. Our presence has created numerous
positive benefits to the seven cities we serve. The
following more clearly illustrates the kind of positive local
impact we've been able to make in 1988 alone:
1988 Projected
NDC
Payroll (including payroll taxes) $350,000
Franchise Fees 175,000
Public Access Corporation 100,000
Local Advertising 210,000
Capital Purchases 475,000
60 East Marie Avenue • West St. Paul, Minnesota 55118 • Telephone (612) 457-1540
W
Continental will also spend another $950,000 in other
operating expenses, many of those dollars benefitting local
businesses. In addition, Continental is an active member of
the Northern Dakota County and Inver Grove Heights/South St.
Paul chambers of Commerce.
And our local programming efforts have brought national
recognition to.this area. our combined local programming
efforts in both Northern Dakota County and St. Paul have
received five nominations for national programming awards for
programs that have featured unique aspects of our community.
In closing, we remain optimistic that we will be able to
maintain high quality service as long as rates keep pace with
expenses. We look forward to continuing to build on our
positive relationships with our subscribers, community
organizations and businesses, and government and community
leaders in Northern Dakota County.
Sincerely,
Randall Coleman
Vice President and
District Manager
cc: Mayor
City Council
NDC Cable Commission
I
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
DECEMBER 8, 1988
TO: Mayor, City Council and Citygi� rator
---" 4191�
FROM: Mary Ann DeLaRosa, Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT: Commission Terms of Expiration
At year end, it is again time to consider the terms of
expiration for the City's commission members and to determine
which members may be interested in another term and which do
not seek reappointment.
The following Planning Commission members terms expire
on January 31, 1989:
NAME
Sandra Krebsbach
Ultan Duggan
Bill Burke
ADDRESS
1832 Twin Circle
815 Hazel Court
707 Decorah Lane
DATE OF APPOINTMENT
2-1-86
2-1-86
2-1-80
Parks Commissioners whose terms expire on January 31
include:
Robert Leffert 669 Maple Park Drive 2-1-85
John Huber 1349 Cherry Hill Rd. 1-19-88
Bill Owens 1831 Walsh Lane 7-1-87
Northern Dakota County Cable Communications Commission NDC4
Mike Sokol, 1847 Faro Lane, our citizen representative
to NDC4 has been appointed by the Commission as its legal
counsel. Therefore, Mike will be resigning and we need to
appoint a replacement. When Mike was appointed in March,
1987, we also received resumes from Ron Rogosheske, 2333
Rogers Avenue and Judy Skoglund, 687 Apache Lane. Council
may wish to solicit further applicants or determine whether
either of the above two previous applicants are interested in
appointment to NDC4.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Council should determine who wishes to be reappointed or
not reappointed and seek replacements for those not seeking
reappointment. Actual appointments will be made in January.
madlr
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
DECEMBER 13, 1988
TO: Kevin D. Frazell, City Administrator
FROM: Mary Ann DeLaRosa, Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT: Resignation
This memo will serve as notice of my impending
resignation effective with two weeks notice. My last day of
employment with the City will be Tuesday, December 27, 1988.
Thanks to you and the rest of the staff and Council for
allowing me the opportunity to be a part of the City for the
past ten years. I'll miss everyone here, but am looking
forward to the new challenges ahead.
madlr
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 11, 1988
TO: Mayor, City Council and City i11 s or
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets
Job No. 8625
Improvement No. 86, Project No. 13
nTQrTTQQTnM .
Orf ei Contracting, Inc. has satisfactorily completed the above project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Council accept the project and authorize
final payment.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council concurs with the recommendation, Council should pass a
motion adopting Resolution No. 88- , RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND AP-
PROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 12.
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING
FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 12
I
It
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Mendota
Heights on May 21, 1987,.Orfei Contracting, Inc. of Hugo, Minnesota, has
satisfactorily completed the sanitary sewers, storm sewers, watermain and
street improvements to serve the area known as Park Place Addition, (Im-
provement No. 86, Project No. 12) in accordance with such contract.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights that the work completed under said contract is hereby ac-
cepted and approved; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby dir-
ected to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract in the
amount of $10,981.32 taking the contractor's receipt in full.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 20th day of
December, 1988.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
t
By,
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
DECEMBER 13, 1988
TO: Mayor, City Council and Cityl� trator
FROM: Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer },
SUBJECT: Tax Exemption of 1986 Improvement Bonds
HISTORY:
At the time we issued our 1986 improvement bonds, the
various provisions for tax exemption were subject to the Tax
Reform Act which had not as yet been passed into law. i
The attached letter from Briggs and Morgan explains the
situation as it affects the bonds and rulings made
subsequently.by the IRS.. Our resolution at the time the
bonds were issued specified the bonds as "qualified tax
exempt obligations".
The IRS requires that this designation be made in a
specific manner as specified in the attached housekeeping
resolution.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Adopt the attached Resolution No. 88-99, to specify the
1986 improvement bonds as "qualified" bonds.
LES:madlr
attachments
LAW OFFICES
BRIGGS AND MORGAN
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDINO
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
TELEPHONE (812) 291-1215
TELECOPIER (812) 222-4071
INCLUDING THE FORMER FIRM OF
LEVITT, PALMER, BOWEN, ROTMAN & SHARE
December 8, 1980
Mr, Lawrence Shaughnessy
City Treasurer
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 552120
Re: $2,500,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1986
Deur Larry:
The above referenced bonds (the "Bonds") were issued in
1.986 while the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the "Act") was pending in
the United States House of Representatives and in the United
States Senate, The Act contained several provisions which had a
retroactive effective date prior to the date of issuance of the
Bonds. One of these provisions affected purchasers of the Bonds
in that it completely disallowed any interest expense on money
which was treated as borrowed to purchase the Bonds. However,
the Act contained a provision which allowed the City to designate
the Bonds as "qualified tax exempt obligations" (commonly
referred to as "bank qualified bonds"). This designation is
important because it allows bondholders to deduct 80% of their
interest expense on any money treated as borrowed -for the bonds.
If the designation of the Bonds as "qualified tax exempt
obligations" is not effectively made, then no part of that
interest expense is deductible.
ble. In the resolution authorizing
the issuance of the Bonds, the City designated the Bonds under
the Tax Reform Act as "qualified tax exempt obligations".
2210 MN WORLD TRADE CENTER 2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING 2400 IDS CENTER
SAINT PAUL, 4INNIMOTA 55101 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 HINNEAPOLIS, HI".ZSOTA 55-102
M121 ent � 11.1"1 (0121201.1215 (Cmv 0.10 - Oest
BRIGGS AND MORGAN
The Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988
("TAMRA"), which became law on November 14, 1988, requires that
the designation of the Bonds as "qualified tax exempt
obligations" be made under Section 265(b)(3) of Lhe Code and that
it be made this year. Although i't is possible that the Internal
Revenue Service will announce an extension of the time for the
designation, because a designation was made under the Tax Reform
Act and the resolution contained a covenant to take whatever
action is necessary to effectuate this designation, it is
important that the enclosed resolution be adopted to designate
the Bonds as "qualified tax exempt obligations" as required by
TAMRA.
If any bondholder decides to sell the Bonds it owns at some
future time and the City has not adopted this resolution, the
market value of -the Bonds may be less and the bondholder might
attempt to bring an action against the City because of the
reduction in value of its Bonds.
Please see that the enclosed resolution is adopted at the
earliest possible date and, in any event if at all possible, no
later than December 31, 1988. We suggest that you retain a copy
of this resolution in your files in case any Bondholder requests
information regarding this matter.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
ery truly yours,
Mary M `Dyrr`se -h
Enc.
cc: The Shaughnessy Company
554S
Extract of Minutes of a Meeting of the
City Council of the
City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota
Pursuant to due call and notice hereof, a
meeting of the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights,
Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall, in said City on
, the day of
, 198_, at _ _ P.M.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING
CERTAIN BONDS ISSUED IN 1986
AS -QUALIFIED TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS"
A. WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota (the
"Issuer"), issued its $2,500,000 General Obligation Improve-
ment Bonds, Series 1986 (the "Bonds") after August 7, 1986,
the effective date of the federal Tax Reform Act of 1986; and
B. WHEREAS, when the Bonds were issued, the Issuer made
a designation that it intended to qualify the Bonds under
Section 802(e)(3) of H.R. 3838 of the 99th Congress as passed
by the House of Representatives; and
C. WHEREAS, the Issuer covenanted to take such actions
as are necessary to effectuate such attempted designation; and
D. WHEREAS, for the Bonds to get the benefit of being
designated as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" under Section
265(b)(3) of the federal Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the "Code"), it is necessary that the Issuer
designate the Bonds pursuant to subparagraph (B) of Section
1009(b)(3) of the federal Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue
Act of 1988 ("TAMRA") and Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; and
E. WHEREAS, the Bonds qualify for such designation
because they are not private activity bonds (or, if private
activity bonds, are qualified 501(c)(3) bonds, or refund bonds
which were not industrial development bonds or private loan
bonds), the Issuer with respect to bonds issued in 1986 is a
"qualified small issuer" of $10,000,000 or less of bonds, and
not more than $10,000,000 of bonds issued in 1986 have been
designated:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Designation of Qualified Tax -Exempt Obligations. In
order to qualify the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt
obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the
Code, the Issuer hereby makes the following -factual statements
and representations:
(a) the Bonds were issued after August 7, 1986;
(b) the Bonds are not "private activity bonds" as
defined in Section 141 of the Code, or, if private activity
bonds, they are:
(i) qualified 501(c)(3) bonds as defined in
Section 145 of the Code, or
(ii) obligations issued to refund (or which
are part of a series of obligations issued to
refund) obligations issued before August 8, 1986,
which were not industrial development bonds (as
defined in Section 103(b)(2) of the federal Internal
Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, as in effect on
the day before the date of the enactment of the
federal Tax Reform Act of 1986) or a private loan
bond (as defined in Section 103(o)(2)(A) as so in
effect, but without regard to any exemption from
such definition other than Section 103(o)(2)(A));
2
(c) the Issuer hereby designates the Bonds as
"qualified tax-exempt obligations" for purposes of Section
265(b)(3) of the Code;
(d) at the time the Bonds were issued, the amount
of tax-exempt obligations (other than private activity bonds,
treating qualified 501(c)(3) bonds as not being private
activity bonds) which had been and were to be issued in 1986
by the Issuer (and all entities treated as one issuer with the
Issuer, and all subordinate entities thereof) during calendar
year 1986 was not reasonably expected to and did not exceed
$10,000,000; and
(e) not more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued
by the Issuer during calendar year 1986 have been designated
for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing
resolution was duly seconded by member
after full discussion thereof and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and
adopted.
3
and
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 12, 1988
TO: Mayor, City Council and City in' rator
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Mendakota County Club
Private Watermain Agreement
DISCUSSION:
Mendakota Country Club is extending a 611 fire service watermain to
their new club house building and if they make this fire service a private
watermain extension,St. Paul -Water Utility will allow them to tap directly
off it for their domestic service. Making it a private watermain also
allows them to tap off it and install a fire hydrant directly in front of
the building (as required by the Mendota Heights Fire Marshal).
RECOMMENDATION:
The Mendakota Country Club Private Watermain Agreement is a standard
agreement that the City has executed in many other instances and staff
recommends that the City execute it (see attached).
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the Staff recommendation they should
pass a motion authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to execute the agreement on
behalf of the City.
I
�0•gob'-t3�¢it'N'Wy�nx'3�-+
a. V=f r 49-11*
�tj �tOU.�+kclv'bJ,�
uIll 11�1
a h�d31+�i 8 is. r+ 4
I
•�M
ti f • J
� \ � r
91
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
k
ON DECEMBER 20, 1988
Excavating Licenses:
Consolidated Plumbing & Heating (Encon Utilities)
Ro-So Contracting, Inc.
General Contractor License:
Genz -Ryan Plumbing & Heating Co.
Sign Installer License:
Crosstown Sign, Inc.
Signart Company, Inc.
10-Admin
60-Utlities
15 Dec
Claims Lis-
20-88 12-Elections
70-Parks Page 1
20-Police
8Q-Planning
Thu 11:-'- M
City of Mendota F
nts
- 30-Fire
85-Recycling
40-Code Enfc
90-Animal Control
Temp Check Number 1
Temp.
Check
Number Vendor Name
Account Code
Comments
Amount
1 Albinson
05-4300-105-15
Blueline
103.94
1
103.94
Totals Temp Check Number
1
Temp Check Number 2
;�. 2 Earl F Anderson Assoc
6.01-4420-050-50 °5'S
sign posts770.75
1...0.-._'�......—._,..._._._ � - - __ �-VCE!%3_�4�i�i':z+.---_------�*Cata.LCg17!<:... -
,.....-`.--•+..-.,...•. — r• �-----.^-•:—_--:+ai.fi•
'4 _ .______ ,,. ,'_ _..eh:+. ,.,+...,
2
770.75
Totals Terno Check Number
2
Temp Check Number 3
3 Arneson Fuel Oil Service -
- 08-4490-000-00 -
generator- fuel - -
--•• - 70.37.-
0.37•-70.37
70.37
Totals Temp Check Number
3
Tem.p Check Number_ s 41Asx' :
��3..°•.t.i:s` �.t�i r _.'F�+�_.-`.-• - �-t.�'+1ys.r!•..;�:i..;_:_.g
�' i____. l_a'.;'iXGFin *�,: *S `.�i ...i,y ��.=7:2:'A._",(}^'�2_.�.�.���•a'.''L�I._t�''�X1t�`'i.".'.i-ii.+.
.. �., : >. :.��%y Cz ^
rt;R„.•
a .A3r��:.w_',."-Ti"-.
i-�-�v_. - .. w: w'e•;: _ era—__•.•.'�
y
..'w-::_•
r't_Y'm. T��—_'—__"--_"'T=�ne'r�^T-
—_- ...
..
4 AT&T-�
01-4210-020-20
final billing
26.33
4
26.33
._ .:•-. Totals Temp Check Number--...
--•--- 4 - ....- - -- -- ._.
_ __ - ._ ._ _._ +.
_ __-- _-- _ _ -
Temp Check Number 5
5 B&J Auto Supply
01-4330-490-70
mise parts
38.32
5
38.32
Totals Terno Check Number
5
Temp Check Number 6
6 City Motor Supply
01-4330-440-20
mise parts
57.25
6 City Motor Supply
01-4330-490-50
mise parts
84.00
12
i41. c5
Totals Temo Check Number
6
Terno Check Number 7
7 Gold Star Printing
01-4305-020-20
report forms
246.00
7
246.00
Totals Temp Check Number
7
Terno Check Number 8
8 ICMA RC
01-2072
;2/16 payroll
373.87
Tamp Check Number 11
11 Lakeland Ford 01-4330-490-50
Totals TernD Check Number li
Temp Check Number 12
12 Leef Bros Inc
12 Leef Bros Inc
12 Leef Bros Inc
36
Totals Tamp Check Number
Temp Check Number 13
13 Med Centers HP
13 Med Centers HP
13 Med Centers HP
13 Med Centers HP
rDrs 304
72.03
.,. 'F� .__- ,....r•� •sFt�".).,u t-. {-Ar.y }^�4�.-. i_4C.�: �r..ira.— .......�...a.._..�..� 72.03-.._._.._�.-
01-4335-310-50 Dec svc 14.50
01-4335-310-70 Dec svc 14.50
15-4335-310-60 Dec svc 14.50
43. 50
1'2
01-2074 Dec prem 754.05
01-4131-110-10 Dec prem 867.90
05-4131-105-15 Dec Drem 706.50
01-4131-020-20 Dec Drem 17560.70
15 Dec
Claims Lis'
Pace 2
Thu 11:a IM
City of Mendota F
•nts
Temp Check Number 8
Tamp.
Check
Number Vendor Name
Account Code
Comments
Amount
8 ICMA RC
01-4134-110-10
12/16 payroll
78.46
16 -
452.33
Totals Tamp Check Number
8
Temp Check Number 9
>ducrts_• •-.
9 "r.s_ Pr-o-
nisc parts
118.406
�-
x.9 Kar_Products_.;..
-01-4305-020-20
mise,p
-
40r r=�-=�•_ :a-�--
18.artsa
'
9 Kar Products
01-4305-050-50
rnisc parts
118.40
9 Kar Products
01-4305-070-70
mise parts
118.40
9 Kar Products
15-4305-060-60
mise parts
118.41
45
592.01
Totals Temp Check Number
9
Tamp Check Number. 10
10 Tom Knuth
45-4415-849-00
project mileage
5.62
nuthA �+" --:r�.• 47-4415-852-00 y.. -_ z�,•.,_• pra�ect mileage 1. :.�: ::._* t
...... s ..
s = i= �[:`dt�i_ �_-�'�i oV 2 :i { e •'ti
r. -"' .p..—i` ,:4t'. ....yam , - ?i''•':�'+:G_-.-�'SF. .;y. ��.�•'. s�'.•t'-2''_ ".�' ^L'`.�"..•'.�,
.y Via'-s _10 ~TomwKOrz-IR 57.60 -
a,
.: ,:.+310'�.Torn"Knuth+x_T#. .�- _
.. .� _
. _ _ 4s.A.... x _.
.48-4415-853-00--
11`1'
:•• project" mileage
aC'
10 Tom Knuth 7,
49-4415-854-00
project mileage
4.50
10 Torn Knuth -
54-4415-858-00
project mileage
11.70
10 Tom Knuth
05-4415-105-15
mise mileage
2.25
60
- ---....._ -
-- 83.92
Totals Ternp Check Number.-------
—10
Tamp Check Number 11
11 Lakeland Ford 01-4330-490-50
Totals TernD Check Number li
Temp Check Number 12
12 Leef Bros Inc
12 Leef Bros Inc
12 Leef Bros Inc
36
Totals Tamp Check Number
Temp Check Number 13
13 Med Centers HP
13 Med Centers HP
13 Med Centers HP
13 Med Centers HP
rDrs 304
72.03
.,. 'F� .__- ,....r•� •sFt�".).,u t-. {-Ar.y }^�4�.-. i_4C.�: �r..ira.— .......�...a.._..�..� 72.03-.._._.._�.-
01-4335-310-50 Dec svc 14.50
01-4335-310-70 Dec svc 14.50
15-4335-310-60 Dec svc 14.50
43. 50
1'2
01-2074 Dec prem 754.05
01-4131-110-10 Dec prem 867.90
05-4131-105-15 Dec Drem 706.50
01-4131-020-20 Dec Drem 17560.70
15 Dec Claims Lis Page 3
Thu 11:� ,M City of Mendota i jhts
1
Temp Check Number 13
Temp.
Check
Number Vendor Name
Account Cede
Comments
Amount
13 Mled Centers HP
01-4131-040-40
Dec
prem
370.00
13 Med Centers HP
01-4131-050-50
Dec
Dram
79.15
13 Med Centers HP
15-4131-060-60
Dec
prem
- 161.40 -
13 Med Centers HP
01-4131-070-70
Dec
prem
260.75
104
5,473.45
Totals Temp Check Number
13
. .--Temp- Check-- Number- 14-Js�=_=e�ae
-- L•�r }�o$a �-
— ---
-- - -
14 Mendota Hghts Rubbish
01--4280-310-50
Nov
Svc
28.75
14 Mendota Hohts Rubbish
01-4260-310-70
Nov
svc
28.75
14 Mendota Hghts Rubbish
15-4280-310-60
Nov
svc
28.75
14 Mendota Ho_hts Rubbish
01-4280-315-30
Nov
svc
40.25
'�• .yy� ,.s..._-�—.+:_�r9:.SY' - ...+`W.�.-a..-.e_� �+.a.r��+....•i.�.+.
_r ..-.-...��.,-._.a..._--..._. �._ .._ -..e ._._. _. ri.-r•_._.�_.,�-
•__ _-_-.
,.•�. _..-._.. _.. -w,+•--....._
...+rte.+--�.---___-.--+..�.,,��_.—...+.e-_•_`T..._-r ...r w
56
126.50
Totals Temp Check Number
14
Temp Check ^Number 15
y+.-• <=Y^` J VA, - - .T� '._ :7' �. _ - -_ - iii -.
..rx.:.i'.��•�"` �•�t��3..t is.: `urr.� w-�'3svt' s'F:^'w >':tt+-�,5i{:nrTG-�y_ a, � sG� `�(,��•��'�{3�hv�`
TJ•W'q'"=.SN.}'�`.a r'Y J. � +'SAT' �f "`e!6. A 4i moi• '�2 +9[
'-
F {}
o•, "i _'J �P�"='^•'' { �
P.. T
,...�F
_. Metro- Waste. Control _r �..,;._V
--w — .l...yy`:
m _. `s_—=�::
.15-4448-060-60 =-- amu«-t�A1.nN�
.✓.. ..
Nov-svc
.T1'c:"Nw�'�d-Y."br
,.
ch g—�-.--•_
, f'e��i9 ,:� i n..���Mt�+i'.•Y.
� _ ��r4, 300. 00 .-L--''-•
15 Metro Waste Control
15-3615
Aom
fee
143.00cr
30 -
14,157.00
Totals Temp Check Number
15
- Temp Check' Number.. 16
16 Midwest Siren Service
07-4330-000-00
Dec
m-cen
62.40
16
62.40
Totals Temp Check Number
16
_.F. e..*. F.- __.—.._..a.. �-�.. {R µ.-., L. _r :'y.._.
nJw:t C..J
_
f _,'t� r •_-..��+w._.-.---....____•
C `- __.. �..-.... _.......+..__. _................ .__ r.�R3u`
Temp Check Number 17
-
17 Minn Dept of Revenue
0174320-050-50
Nov
fuel tax
55.20
17
55. '2.7
Totals Temo Check Number
17
Tarim Check Number 18
18 Minnesota Teamsters Loc 320
01-2075
Dec
cues
175. GO
18
175.00
Totals Temp Check Number
18
TerOD Check Number 19
19 Northern States Power
01-4212-315-3o
Dec
svc
312.22
15 Dec
Claims Lis`
Page 4
Thu 11:� .M
City of Mendota f ,its
Temp Check Number 19
Temp.
Check
Number Vendor Name
Account Cade
Comments
Amount
19 Northern States Power
01-4212-310-50
Dec
svc
192.95
19 Northern States Flower
15-4212-310-60
Dec
svc
192.95
1 - 19 Northern States Power ---
01-4212-310-70 - r -
Dec
svc----
192.96
19 Northern States Power
01-4212-320-70
Dec
svc
61.52
19 Northern States Power
15-4212-400-60
Dec
svc
14.00
19 Northern States Power
01-4212-110-10
Dec
svc
139.50
19 Northern States Power
01-4212-020-20
Dec
svc
180.10
19 Northern States Power
01-4212-040-40--
Dec
svc
22.45
19--Northern-States' Power -
Dec- svc - `e ''z°
-"�+ "' 89: 85--, -
19 Northern States Power
01-4211-315-30
Dec
svc
325.89
19 Northern States Power-
01-4211-310-50
Dec
svc
200.66
228
1,925.05
Totals Temp Check Number
19
Temp Check Number -- 20
20 Northern States Power
15-4211-310-60
Dec
svc-
200.66
20 Northern States Power
01-4211-310-70
Dec
svc =
200.65
20 Nor. t her n States. Power .
28-4211-000-00
svc
rt'cY
e 618. 05 ,;--.,;-
y' r..
20+Northern States Power - -
01-4211-420-50 m -Dec
Dec
svc = -
::'+ . = 142.64
20,Northern States Power
01-4211-320-70
Dec
svc
59.31
20 Northern States Power
15-4211-400-60
Dec
svc
404.01
20 Northern States Power
01-4211-110-10
Dec
svc
172.85
20 Northern States Power
01-4211-020-20
Dec
svc
221.25
20 Northern States Power
01-4211-040-40
Dec
svc
27.10
20 Northern States Power
05-4211-105-15
Dec
svc
110.61 -
200
2,157.13
Totals Temo Check Number
20
Temp Check Number 21
21 Orfei Contracting Inc
31-4460-839-00
Final
66-12
10, 981. 3E_
21
--
Totals Temp Check Number
21
Temp Check. Number ac
22 Oxygen Service Co.
01-4305-050-50
cyl
act tnrU 11/15
1.2.60
22
12. GO
Totals Temp Check Number
22
Temp Check Number 23
23 Pine Bend Flaving
01-4422-050-50
Mc
mix
344.75
23
364.75
Totals TemD Check Number
23
15 Dec
Claims Lis'
Fuge 5
S
Thu 11:0 IM
City of Mendota F nts
Temp Check Number 24
Temp.
Check
Number Vendor Name
Account Code
Comments
Amount
24 Public Emol Ret Assn
01-2062
12/2
payroll
2,553.50
24 Public Empl Ret Assn
01-4134-110-10
12/2
payroll
222.15
= 24 Public Empl Ret Assn
- 01-4134-020-20,:
12/2
payroll
-- - 2,274.56 --- -
24 Public Empl Ret Assn
01-4134-030-30
12/2
payroll
9.79
24 Public Em'p1 Ret Assn
01-4134-040-40
1'2/2
payroll l
103. 39
24 Public Ernpl Ret Assn
01-4134-050-50
12/2
payroll
190.72
24 Public Empl Ret Assn
01-4134-070-70
12/2
'payroll
112.06
Empl Ret Assn
15-4134-060-60 is
12/2
payroll
69.06
r24.Publ`c
.�24-Public- Empl 05-4134-105-15a
12/2-
payroll----=�-
260.60—
24 Public Emol Ret Assn
23-1145
12/2
payroll
115.77
240
5,911.60
Totals Temp Check Number
24
Temp Check Number 25
25 S&T Office Products
01-4300-020-20
index cards
1.57
25 S&T Office Products
01-4300-020-20
desk
organizer
_ 11.21
25 S&T Office Products
01-4300-110-10
appt
book•
6.00 -
-- _ •t - -- _ `i... yy ..,. j._
icL.z..7yrei �" „`iir,•`' r ..•;fi$�: '1F'�`
_ _�..i - - .']+` s: Fir:' YY . ^!". ^- - _ ..i. :l.a' F: '^.j � Y.��._ _
T 4L r.h..`.I':a" - s• - .•„Si:g `.t'r?.'`'':.i'Y. Jti.. .{y' y,:'
nL+x-�STa:. �----- ��•. - -
.+.- +'.it= `i '-:w ^wr- xay.-: i::•
Totals Temp Check Number
25
Temp Check Number 26
26 Snyder Drug Stores
01-4300-050-50
mise
solys
43.34
26
43.34
Totals Temp Check Number
26
Temp Check Number 27
27 Southview Chevrolet
._--. 15-4330-490-60
- = part
403 - _.-
�_.__�..." 20.06
L7
20. Q10
Totals Temp Check Number
27-
Temp Check Number 28
28 Sun Newspapers
01-4240-080-80
hro
rjotice 5-c vac
15.41
28 Sun Newspapers
01-4240-110-10
Ord
259
35.77
56
Totals Temp Check Number
28
Temp Check Number 29
29 Uniforms Unlimited
01-4410-020-20
mise
Mack.
158-60
29 Uniforms Unlimited
01-4410-020-20
overshoes
Wicks
22.45
58
181.05
Totals Temp Check N. moer
29
15 Dec
Claims List
Page 6
Thu 11:3 .11
City of Mendota F its
Temp Check Number. 30
Temp.
Check
Number Vendor Name
Account Code
Comments
Amount
30 United Central Trustee
01-2071
Dec orem
38.67
30 United Central Trustee
01-4132-020-20
Dec prem
41.59
30 United Central Trustee
01-4132-050-50
Dec prem
16.39
30 United Central Trustee
15-4132-060-60
Dec orem
8.52
30 United Central Trustee
01-4132-070-70
Dec orem
10.19
Totals.-T rap.Check Number
30 4 S
z
Tertip Check Number
31 University of Minnesota
01-1215
Frear Kaiser
90.00
31
Totals Temp, Check Number
31
Temo Check Number. 32
32 . S. Post Office
05-4318-M-15
- permit fee 6166
60.00
Totals,Terilp, Check Number
.32
Temp Check Number 33
33 1 0 S
01-4330-440-20
Dec mton
93.22
33
93.22
Totals Temp Check Number
33
Temo Check Number 34
34 Gooher State One Call
15-4210-060-60
Nov calls
106.00
34 Gopher State One Call
15-4210-060-60
Oct call's
31.215
68-
F-!::
137.25
Totals Temo Check Number
34
L. — -- S3
Temp Check Number 35
35 Dakota Press
01-4305-030-50
Daily rot forms
66.35
35 Dakota Press
01-4305-070-70
Daily rot forms
66.35
35 Dakota Press
15-4305-060-60
Daily rot -forms
66.30
105
199.00
Totals Temp Check Number
35
Temp Check Number 36
36 Facility Systems Inc
08-4600-000-00
files
.2.565.75
40
Totals Terno Check Number
Temp Check Number 41
41J'General Office Products
41 General Office Products
41 General Office Products
41 General Office Products
164
Totals Temp Check Number
Temp Check Number 42
42 Holden Business Forms
42 Holden Business Forms
42 Holden Business Forms
126
Totals Temo Check Number
146. 00
40
08-4600-000-00 tables 7,463.31
08-4600-000-00 Planters 910.00
08-4600-000-00 Clocks 499.20
06-4600-000-00 Lamb 159.00
9,031.51
41
01-4300-020-20 mailino labels 74.20
01-4300-110-10 mailing labels 111.30
05-4300-105-15 mailing labels 111.30
296.80
42
15 Dec
Claims Lis'
Pa°e 7
Thu 11:s- ,M
City of Mendota
F nts
- -'
1
Temp Check Number 36
Temp.
Check
Number Vendor Name
1
Account Code
Comments
Amount
36 Facility Systems Inc
08-4600-050-00
labor install files
20.25
36 Facility Systems Inc
08-4600-000-00
files
3,769_20
108
6,355.20
Totals Temp Check Number
i
36
Temp Check Number -,z, 37
��ss.=x=¢37=-F-isco:% ._-'�_::•--�- %"_ e...�,4.-,•,e ,0i.. 1]i - 4305-030-30:--r
�. trrt _•: �fJ,.'..;7w:J r. ,'r,�,u:uy, Z' •rte �Yr •,rc't' 'r: - ,=ry
fusee_s-
49. 53
37
149.53
Totals TemD Check Number
37
Terno Check. Number 38
38 Knutson Rubbish Service
01-4280-110-10
Nov Svc
24.62
--
_
24.62
Totals Temp Check Number
38
_ •�vj. iM4j. _ `. _Rt _T'- _ "!�''y�1••''f44 .j: '.,T. -
i r'6 :r1i2.tL"+c"'� :.#' •��Y."''`i.' ?'-�'�n"�i .i�"wh�-1.".•F'{.'{t�E"d:. *... `Ap 'S::i: •i+
Temp_.CheckNu ober.._
rXri'k -r-. - .fi J.J t- r -f ♦.e.l'r 1•*„ -
,'�*; z,, -'$r+: t`.- .m er �.�,`;'s � . e:..,. "S3G:�, i:'s
.1!: y.'SKv %:'xt.'- :i:i'Z-_ '1F'1 -.v :Z _
^-'A ..i`_, a�:+,- ,.$':'fi~ib." .,x�%1 K': vs $�:1� .'k-�.:.
�z
39 Metro. Area Mgr Assn-
iii -4400-110-10
.. _ 11/23 rntg
- -- 12.00 -
--
39
12.00
Totals Temo Check Number
39
Temp Check Number 40
40 Freeway Radiator Svc
15-4330-490-60
rors403
146.00
40
Totals Terno Check Number
Temp Check Number 41
41J'General Office Products
41 General Office Products
41 General Office Products
41 General Office Products
164
Totals Temp Check Number
Temp Check Number 42
42 Holden Business Forms
42 Holden Business Forms
42 Holden Business Forms
126
Totals Temo Check Number
146. 00
40
08-4600-000-00 tables 7,463.31
08-4600-000-00 Planters 910.00
08-4600-000-00 Clocks 499.20
06-4600-000-00 Lamb 159.00
9,031.51
41
01-4300-020-20 mailino labels 74.20
01-4300-110-10 mailing labels 111.30
05-4300-105-15 mailing labels 111.30
296.80
42
15 Dec
Claims Lis
Wage 8
Thu li:Zt, iM
City of Mendota t
Ahts•-.
Temp Check Number--__. __ 43
..- Temp. ------•- -- ._.,__..____.. _
Check
Number Vendor Name-._.- -
Account Code -
Comments
Amount --
43 Lees Building Mtcn
01-4490-110-10
mise paper splys
23.80 -- - --
43 Lees Building Mtcn
01-4490-020-20 -
mise paper solys
23.80
43 Lees Building Mtcn
01-4490-040-40 s
mise paper splys
2:3.80
43 Lees Building Mtcn
05-4490-105-15
mise paper splys
23.85
43 Lees Building Mten
01-4335-110-10
Nov svc
138.40
43 Lees Building Mtcn
01-4335-020-20
Nov svc
181.00
_ 43 Lees Building Mtcn
01-4335-040-40 -
Nov svc
16.80
Lees Building Mtcn
05-4335-105-15
Nov svc
73.30
344
504.75
Totals Temp Check Number--
43
Temo Check Number 44
44 County Recorder
54-4475-858-00
filino fee 88-2
20.00
44 County Recorder
45-4475-849-00
filino fee 87-4
10.00
44 County Recorder
43-4475-847-00
filing fee 87-2
10.00
132
40.00
Totals Temp Check Number
44
Temo Check Number 45
45 Russ E`Smith Co
01-4330-460-30
tie rod 2295"
28.85
45 _
- -
28.85 -
Totals Temp Check Number
45
Temp Check Number 46
46 Brunson Instrument
05-4330-490-15
rprs
261.20
46
261.20
Totals Temo Check Number
46
Temp Check Number 47
47 Holst Exc
01-4421-050-50
icing sand
397.78
47
397.78
Totals Temp Check Number
47
Temp Check Number. .. 1 48 --.-_-..
---.- -- ---- --- - -
-
- 48 Metro Systems-
08-4600-000-00
work surfaces
374.00 -
48 Metro Systems
08-4600-000-00
Office furniture
4,599.00
-------- -- - -
96
4,973.00
Totals Temp Check Number
48
Temp Check Number 49
49 Herman Miller Inc
08-4600-000-00
Office furnisnings
5,103.56
' 15 oec
czaims Lis
Page s
�
rhv'11^�)~ Am ' ____--- -_----'-------
� City or Mendota , u:ts-
----'----'--
-��-�-- ^---�--�----~
Temp Check Number------ - 49
)
—
_ 'Temp.- - ' - ' -
--- - --- -- -- -' - -----
' '-
-- ------- - ---------''----------------'
Check
Number vendor Name '
Account code
Comments ''
-' Amount - ----
49 Herman Miller Inc
08-4600-000-00
^
- '--------'
1,4sa'5s
49 Herman Miller Inc
^ 08-4600-000-00 �
^
835'60
)
*g Herman Miller Inc
08-4600-000-00
^
' - '
1y,y1a'ns -
49 Herman Miller, Inc
08-4600-000-00
^
412'16
_-------- ' -'
/
--- _
245
---.
-.
27,768'44
TotalsTemp Check Number
+y �
'
Temp Check Number so
'
-50.-Mort on-Thokpk,-
--���_�----°�.�aare
t salt -�������
561.
ow
oa1'am
Totals Temp Check Number
Sm
Temp Check Number 51
51 *iohsmith_o,
01-4300-020-20
desk
organizers
39'25
-_-_-
--
51
.
3e-e5
Totals Temp Check Number
-'
51
Temp Check Number-., � 52
52 Iuenti'xit Co
01
kit
rental
10e'00 .
5e
1m2'mm
Totals Temp Check Number
52
Temp Check Number oo
53 J a A Cleaners
01-4410-020-e0
Nov
uniform czno
159'75
__-_-_
--
53
z5s'ro
Totals Temp Check Number
53
Temp Check Number 54
- -
-
54 Leonard wanitz
01-+410-050-50
' -.
clothing
allowance
140'00
------
--
54 '
1wx'ww
Totals Temp Check Number
54
_--- - . --
Tempo:ecx wumuer 55
55 Minn Cellular Tele Co
01-+210-0e0-20
Dec
svc
10'95
� 55 Minn Cellular-Tele Co '-
- 01-+210-020-20
Dec
s,c
a'ya - -- ------'
---
110
-----
1r'so
Totals Temp Check Number
55
Temp Check Number 56
15 Dec
Claims Lis
Page 10 =
Thu 11. IM
City of Mendota . ghts _
.-_ _ __ ___�-_ �__ -- __._-
..... .._ _ __�-_ _.• �__- . »_. - .
Temp Check Number.-•-.. - •-• ._-- 56 -----•- ------
- - - --.__ _-_ _ ._.. ---- -.--•----_
__. Temp. _._. _. _ __ �_-�.-._-.__
_ _. ._ ---, ._. - .__--- -• -. _ __-� __.__ ..
_.-._ ..._. _--------- _-- -.
_� __ __ __�.» w. --- .-- ._.___ _.- __
Check
Number Vendor Name - --- •— - - ---- --• - Account Cade - -
Comments - -
- Amount - -- --
56 Midwest Photo Svc
01-4305-020-20
Nov photos ----- -- -
42. 06 - - -
56
42. 06
Totals Temp Check Number
56
Temp Check Number M 57
_
.. 57- M ;R Sign Co Inc
r01-4420-050-50
signs/letters
368.72
57 - -
T -
368.72
Totals Temp Check Number
57 -
Temp Check Number 58
58 Public Emol Retirement Assn
01-2074
Dec Drem
33.10
58 Public_ Empl Retirement Assn
01-4131-110-10
Dec Drem
11.90
58 Public Emol Retirement Assn
05-4131-105-15 -•-
Dec prem- -
- 9.00
174
_
: -.. _' _..
54.00
Totals Temp Check Number
58
59
Temp Check Number 59
--
a
X59• Fred Pfeiffer-
01-4410-050-50
clothing allowance'-'�'•-
140.00
-- - --- - --- -
59
--
_ _ __.._. - _ _ _.___._ _.. __
._.._ - 140.,00--
40:00--
Totals Temp Check Number
Totals
-59
Temp Check Number-- 60
-
--- 60 Pink Hartzell -
08-4600-000-00
Drum table
246.50 - -•-- -
60 Pink Hartzell
08-4600-000-00
Office furnish,inos
3,453.45
60 Pink Hartzell
- 08-4600-000-00
14,164.55
60 Pink Hartzell
08-4600-000-00
4,707.80
240 - - -- - - _ .,
..
_ -
22, 572. 30 - -
Totals Temp Check Number --
60- - -
-
_ - '-
Temp Check Number--- 61
61PersonnelDecisions Inc
01-4490-110-10
forms
22.40
22.40
Totals Temp Check Number
61
Temp�Check•Number 62
V
62RoadRescueInc
01-4305-030-30
frt inv 100018
1.46
62
1.46
Totals Temp Check Number
62
15 Dec
Claims Lis
Page 11 -
Thu 11:,-, aM - .._.y_-. - _. ..
-- City of Mendota
_hts._.`..__._...._._.......,-
Temp Check Number -- -- - 63 _--- --.._
_ _
_ _.... _. _
---___- -- -• .- ----- -
.-_
__ -- _.
Temp.
-'
Check
Number Vendor Name - -
Account Code
Comments
Amount
63 Sanitary Products Co -
01-4335-020-20
floor mats - - - - -
- 64.05-•-- - - --
63 Sanitary Products Co
r 05-4335-105-15
floor mats
64.05
63 Sanitary Products Co ---
01-4335-110-10
ice melt - -
25.85 - - --
63 Sanitary Products Co
01-4335-020-20
25.85
63 Sanitary Products Co -- - -
05-4335-105-15
- - - -- -
- - 25.90 - -•- - -
63 Sanitary Products Co
01-4335-110-10
mtcn splys
32.88
-
378 - k- w -r;.-
t. • , _ r°
238.58
Totals Temp Check Number = • r
63
- -- - -- -
Temp -Check Number _.-- 64
_
64 S L S Enterprises
01-4305-020-20
cards
15.00
64 __.__ _ _
-
15.00
Totals Temp Check Number
64
~ „
-yv
Temp Check Number_ "-� 65
• ~
"' r` �'
�'
65 W M I N
01-4490-030-30
Safety message
185.00
185.00
65 i r41:
Totals Temp, Check�_Number-,.._.- --- -
65y
_
Temp Check Number=------ .- - 66-- -.- - ---
--66
66 R B Whitacre & Co
01-4305-070-70
work lite/protractor
38.90
66 R B Whitacre & Co
01-4305-050-50
ratchet
32.45
132 _. ._.._. - --•-- - - - -
-...
71.35
:Totals Temp Check Number -------
66
_ --
_. __... _. .�_-_. .__ __
_ _. .._____._ �.___ _.. ____.•_� -_
Temp Check Number 67
-
67 A T & T-_
01-4210-110-10
Id calls
-12.08
67 A T & T
01-4210-020-20
Id calls
, -t, 0. 92
_67 A T & T
01-4210-030-30
1 d calls -
.
;
- 3.86 -
67 A T & T
01-4210-050-50
1 d calls
` `'= 0.57
268
17.43
Totals Temp Check Number
67
-
Temp Check Number _ ---- _ -. 68 __._s__
., _w--_ • _ ----------- _ _ _.,
- - - - -
-`
68 Barton Aschman Assoc,._._-_.__
10-42220-000-00
Re: preliminary landscape---
- 4,507.29 -- -
_ c=c68
4, 507. 29 -- - r
Totals Temp CheckrNumber:
68
Temp Check Number 69
69 Burke Engr Inc
08-4220-000-00
Re City Hall tele system
900.00
15 Dec
Claims Lis
Page 12
Thu 11:4. 4M-
City of Mendota h jhts --
-
1
Temp Check Number --- 69
Temp.
Check
Number Vendor Name
Account Code
Comments
Amount
69
900.00
Totals Temp Check Number
69
Temp Check Number 70
70 Krechs Ofc Machines
01-4300-110-10
copy paper
459.65
70 Krechs Ofc Machines -
01-4300-030-30
copy paper
28.15
70 Krechs Ofc Machines
01-4300-040-40
copy paper
68.50
' 70 Krechs Ofc Machines
01-4300-080-80-
copy paper
32.80
70 Krechs Ofc Machines
05-4300-105-15
copy paper
303.95
70 Krechs Ofc Machines
10-4300-000-00
copy paper
7.50
70 Krechs Ofc Machines
01-4300-640-12
copy paper
14.10
70 Krechs Ofc Machines
15-4300-060-60
copy paper
23.45
560
938.10
Totals Temp Check Number
70
Temp Check Number 71
_
71 Biffs Inc
01-4200-610-70
Dec `rent
172.00
71
172.00
Totals Temp -Check -Number
71_
Temp Check Number - - - 72
_
72 Gardner Hdwe
01-4330-215-70
parts Park mtcn
118.24
72
1113.24
Totals Temp Check Number
72
Temp Check Number 73
-
73 Dodd Technical Corp
01-4330-490-10
Mtcn Laser het
120.00
73 Dodd Technical Corp-
01-4301-110-10
keyboard
80.00
146 •- - -
200.00 -
Totals Temp Check Number
73
Temp Check Number 74
74 W W Grainoen Incl
01-4305-050-50
part
7_48
74
7.48
-Totals Temp Check Number -
74
Temp Check Number - --- - 75 =
75 Gen Comm
01-4330-440-20
rprs 2243
205.70
75
205.70
Totals Temp Check Number
75
1, ' •_
15 Dec Claims Lis
Thu 11:- aM City of Mendota i _hts
Temp Check Number 76
Temp.
Check
Number Vendor Name Account Code
i
76 Pitney Bowes Credit Corp 01-4330-440-20
76
Totals Temp Check Number 76
Temp Check Number 77
77 Proex 01-4305-030-30
77
Totals Temp Check Number 77
Temp Check Number 76
Fuge 13
Comments Amount
Dict eq 156.00
156.00
prints
6. 66
78 Midwest Wholesale Tire -
01-4330-490-70
tube
7.99
787.99
Totals Temp Check Number
78
Temp Check Number 79
79 Brad Ragan Inc
15-4330-490-60
parts 402
40.87
40.87
Tc?tals�Temp' Check Number ._ -._._
--- 79
MANUAL CHECKS:
11936
2,620.00
Gene Lange
NoV Svc
----------
_______6776-
6776-
11937
120.00
MPGA
Regr Neska, Olund
17.070.83
_
11938
9,674.50
Dakota County Bank
12/2FIT, FICA MEDICARE
Grand Total
11939
755.00
12/2 Bayrmll dedcutions
11940
3,229.66
SCCU
"
_ -
11941
30,829.30 -.
City M.H. Payroll
12/2 Net payroll
11942
3,181.71
Comm Revenue
12/2 & F. D. SIT
11943
2,317.45
Dakota Cty Bank
F. D. B/H
- -
11944
21,882.88
City M.H. Payroll
F. D. Net payroll
11945
60.00
Dakota Cty Warrants Bail
11946
35.00
John Lilleberg
Demo Fitness room
74,705.50
G.T.
201,776.33
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
DECEMBER 9, 1988
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. a�111 ity Administrator
SUBJECT: W, Post #6690 Flag Presentation
The Mendota VFW, Post #6690, would like to present the
Council with United States and Minnesota flags for the new
city hall. Not only are they presenting these initial flags,
but have offered to keep us in new flags in the future.
Mr. Dale -Peterson and other representatives of Post
#6690 will be at the meeting to present the flags to Council.
KDF:madlr
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
DECEMBER 13, 1988
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin I.e"nl, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Dedication Plaque for Mendota Heights City Hall
Attached is a proposed sketch for the city hall
dedication plaque. The plaque will be provided as a part of
the city hall contract. Council needs to ratify what will be
on the plague so that it can be ordered. The listing of the
city officials; architect and contractors is consistent with
the dedication --plaques on the public works garage and the
fire station.
It takes approximately six weeks to get the plaque after
ordering. Therefore, it unfortunately will not be available
by the time of our January 15 open house. However, that
would not seem to me to be a critical enough factor to
postpone the open house.
ACTION REQUIRED:
For Council to
is acceptable, and
deems appropriate.
KDF:madlr
attachment
indicate whether the plaque as proposed
if not, to direct whatever changes it
Lindberg Pierce, Inc. Architects
Suite 1200
15 South Fitth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 James H. Lindberg
(612) 332-3339 Robert L. Pierce
noc
Brass Dedication Plaque Layout for Mendota Heights City Hall
October 20, 1988
"Mendota Heights City Hall" is to be 3/4" high capitals
All other words are to be 1/2" initial capitals
Horizontal lines are to be 1/8" wide
Right and left borders are to be 1 1/2"
Provide 2" minimum space between titles on left and names
on right
Clarendon letter style
. Pebble texture background
MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY HALL _ -- --
—
Dedicated Neye»v ber ' "8 3- -
!s 19P9
70
cT�rn�ar y
Mayor Charles E. Mertensotto
---
Council Members Janet B. Blesener
Carl W. Cummins III--•
+
John M. Hartmann
--
M
_ Elizabeth A. Witt
Kevin
-- )
--
City Adminstrator D. Frazell
Project Manager 'Eugene H. Lange
--�,
-- —
Architect Lindberg Pierce, Inc.
_. kA
General Contractor The Joseph Company, Inc.
—• — ,�
Mechanical Contractor Doody Mechanical, Inc.
—• —
Electrical Contractor Thomas Electric, Inc.
—•
"Mendota Heights City Hall" is to be 3/4" high capitals
All other words are to be 1/2" initial capitals
Horizontal lines are to be 1/8" wide
Right and left borders are to be 1 1/2"
Provide 2" minimum space between titles on left and names
on right
Clarendon letter style
. Pebble texture background
To:
From:
Re:
MEMO
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
December 13, 1988
Mayor and City Council
Kevin Fra k2-ty Administrator
Purch se of Equipment for Exercise Room
As Council is aware, the new City Hall includes a small
exercise room where firefighters, police officers, and other
city employees can work out and stay "in shape."
At the time of_preparing the 1989 budget, a request was made
for $2,500 of city funds to equip the room. Because of the
many expenses associated with moving to the new City Hall, I
declined to include that request in the budget the I
recommended to the Council. However, I did indicate to the
employees that if they would demonstrate a real interest and
financial commitment to the exercise facilities, that I did
think it would be appropriate to request some City
participation.
Interested fire fighters and police officers, assisted by
Chief Dennis Delmont, have now formed a users committee and
drawn up polices for use of the room. Sessions have been
held on proper use of the equipment, and more training is
planned for the future. The firefighters and police officers
have each contributed $1,625 dollars toward initial
furnishing of the room, and have purchased the following
equipment:
8 Station Universal Gym Rowing Machine
Weight Bend Exercise Bike
Olympic Weights
To provide a more complete facility, the users committee is
now requesting that the Council provide up to another $1,625
toward the cost of purchasing additional equipment. Specific
needs include:
Dumbells, Weights, and Collars Mirrors
Instructional and Safety Posters Mats for Equipment
Scale Exercise Mats
Weight Racks Miscellaneous Items
Stools
Given this solid demonstration of commitment to the exercise
program, I am recommending the Council authorize the
requested funds. Because employees from the Administration
and Engineering departments also plan to use the equipment, I
would further recommend that the funds be taken half each
from the contingency line items of those two departments.
Chief Delmont and User Committee Co -Chairs Jim Kilberg and
Mario Reyes will be present to.answer any questions Council
may have about the exercise room.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs with my recommendation, it should pass zC'
motion authorizing the expenditure of up to $1,625 for
purchase of exercise equipment.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
DECEMBER 13, 1988
TO: -Mayor, City Council, and Crator
FROM: Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer
SUBJECT: Sign permit application 1150 Hwy 110, Centre Pointe
Medical Clinic
Discussion: I have received a sign permit application, site
plan, and proposed sign graphic from Rick Fox at Cross Town
Sign for the Centre Pointe Medical Clinic. The property is
zoned B-1 which requires a 30' front yard setback and a 20'
side yard setback. The proposed sign iS located at the North
East corner of the medical clinic property. The proposed
setback (front yard) to the north property line is shown as
301. The proposed setback (side yard) to its east property
line is shown to be 381. Both proposed setbacks meet or
exceed the city's minimum setbacks for B-1 zoning. The
proposed sign is a free standing ground type sign which
contains 49 square feet of sign area (7' X 71). The sign
ordinance allows a maximum of a 50 square ft. sign to be
erected in a B-1 zone.
Recommendation: The proposed setbacks and sign square
footage meet the zoning ordinance standards therefore, staff
would recommend approval of the sign as proposed.
Action Required: If council wishes to implement the staff
recommendation to approve the sign permit it should pass a
motion of approval.
PRB:np
IV)
st
• t lit
I'A
Its
-lx
IN
.............
NIX. N05
wRo:
IN
01-
Qum-
%,
10,
11 --
Ati I, tit._�
11
7
eii
p'
11 --
Ati I, tit._�
11
3:
to
tZc
5 -E
4q,
Seam
L V n Q.
-:vt-LVT'TI Nh"�•D
ww t -e cop-(
17-"
R 14CKCG2dvn►D 42_7-19
V ov ` LG F^c v-cD --
� t>tus j�o�rS - 1�l fOv%j
PIZAW)vjb PCQVIP CD
C►�4P RERns
,
t -
" bo0
Vf�tir�vs „
` r
REAC.'rH ETAS ' , CEN -TRE- Y�trt71E� 1-,1ED%CACr ,"T"OMAS S1(71a Co.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council,
FROM: Klayton Eckles
Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Report on MSA
Job No. 8801
December 15, 1988
Clt
trator
five year plan.
DISCUSSION OF MSA FIVE YEAR PLAN
Every three years Staff completes a five year plan for
Municipal State Aid (MSA) street construction. Attached is a
copy of Staff's proposed five year plan. After the Mendota
Heights Road/ Huber Drive extension is completed the next
priority is the upgrade of Wagon Wheel Trail. Homeowners
along Wagon Wheel have petitioned the City for an upgrade of
the street, so this should be a high priority. An upgrade is
justified given the frequent useage of the street.
Further down the priority list is the widening of
Mendota Heights Road from F.A.I. 35E to Dodd Rd. in 1991,
which is a project that the City promised the State would be
done. In 1991 the upgrade of the Lexington Avenue and T.H.
110 intersection is listed. This is a project that would be
done jointly with the County. Sometime in the future
Victoria Road will need to be improved; by 1993 the MSA fund
would have enough money to complete it.
In practice the only important choice is what takes
place the first year or so; anything after the first year is
only an estimate and can be altered easily. Wagon Wheel is
the only new construction in the first year, so Council
should decide if this is a high priority. If it is a high
priority, a feasibility report would be in order.
Staff recommends Council approve the attached MSA Five
Year Plan as presented. Also Staff recommends Council direct
Staff to complete a feasibility report on an upgrade of Wagon
Wheel Trail to MSA standards.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council desires to implement the Staff recommendation
they should pass a motion approving the MSA Five Year Plan,
and pass resolution 88-_, RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF
A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR UPGRADING OF WAGON WHEEL TRAIL TO
MUNICIPAL STATE AID STANDARDS.
MUNICIPAL STATE -AID STREET SYSTEM
'5 -Year Construction Program For Mendota Heights
(State Aid Expenditures Only)
REVENUE
Present State Aid Construction Balance September 11 1988 = $ 5n6,nOo
Estimated
Annual
Construction Allotment
$_190,000
X 4 =
$ 760,000
Zstimated
Total
State Aid Allotment for
Programming
Purposes
$1,356,000
ESTIRATED EXPENDITURES
Year
Estimated
of
State Aid
Expenditure
Termini
Project Description
Expenditure
On Mendota Heights Road
Construct 44' road with
1988
From 2550' E of Dodd Rd.
Storm Sewer
(September)
To Delaware Avenue
Length .71 miles
$ 302,000
1988
On Huber Drive
Construct'40' road with
(September)
From Mendota Heights Rd.
Storm Sewer
To Center, Sec. 36
$ 70,000
Length 19 miles
1989
On Wagon Wheel Trail
Widen & Realign existing
From TH 149 (Dodd Rd)
Street, add Storm Sewer
To Lexington Avenu
$ 430,000
.Length 1.02'mil es
1991
on Mendota Heights Road
Widen existing city
From FAI 35-E
street from 24' to 441
To T.H. 149 (Dodd Rd-)
add storm sewer
280,000
Length .70 miles - -
1991
on Lexington Avenue
Add turnlanes at
From300' N of T.H. 110
Trunk Highway 110
To 300' S of T.H. 110
$ 50,000
Length 600 fee
1993
On Victoria Road
Widen existing street
From Mari P___AUPnnP
from 24' to 44' add
To T.H. 13
Storm Sewer
$ 270,000
Length 66 mil Pry I
I
I
City of Mendot4 Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR
UPGRADING OF WAGON WHEEL TRAIL TO MUNICIPAL STATE AID STANDARDS
WHEREAS, the County has turned back Wagon Wheel Trail to the City and
is no longer the County's responsibility for improvement and
maintenance; and
WHEREAS, Wagon Wheel Trail is in need of upgrading to Municipal State
Aid Standards.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
That the City Engineer be and is hereby authorized and directed to
prepare a feasibility study as to whether said proposed
improvements are feasible, whether said improvements should best
be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement,
and as to the estimated cost of said improvement.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 20th
day of December, 1988.
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
1
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 14, 1988
TO: Mayor, City Council and City�d ator
FROM: Klayton H. Eckles, Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Purchase of Curbside Recycling Containers
Job No. 8818
DISCUSSION•
As part of our curbside recycling program it will be
necessary to ensure that all residents have containers available
for storing recyclables and transporting them to the curbside. In
order to maintain continuity throughout the City and get the
containers to the residents at no cost (to encourage recycling),
it is prudent that the City provide the containers free of charge.
This can be accomplished by using the County grant money that is
available for just such an endeavor. In fact this is one of the
County's recommended uses for the grant money.
Hennepin County recently made a large purchase of containers
from Rehrig Pacific Company out of Illinois; these containers meet
the same specifications that we have been designing for our
containers. Rehrig has agreed to give us the same price on a
urchase of as many containers as we want. The quoted price of
p$5.25 per container, including a permanent printed logo and
delivery, is much lower than we could hope to get if we bid on our
own. The containers could be delivered to us sometime in February
or later, and we have a choice of colors (dark green, light green,
blue, red, yellow, and white or black). Apparently green and blue
are very popular. In order to meet Rehrig's production time
schedule, we must tell them what color, and how many we desire
before Christmas. In order to get our recycling program in full
swing, an order of 1000 containers would be a good start. Any
more could lead to some storage problems.
Staff will have a container on hand at the meeting to show
how the "Single Container" system works.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends Council approval of a purchase order for the
purchase of 1000 recycling containers from Rehrig Pacific Company
at a price of $5.25 per container.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, they should
pass a motion authorizing staff to proceed and approve a purchase
order for 1000 containers from Rehrig Pacific Company at the price
of $5.25 per container.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
DECEMBER 9, 1988
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: KevCity Administrator
SUBJECT: Appointment of Citizen's Park Committee
At the meeting.of December 6, Council had some
preliminary discussion about the citizen's parks committee,
but declined to make appointments until checking further with
potential candidates. The item is being rescheduled for
tonights agenda, so that Council can make those appointments
and select a chair.
As a reminder, the Planning Commission representatives
will be Sandra Krebsbach and Michael Dwyer, while the Parks
Commission representatives will be Carol Damberg, Bev
Lachenmayer, and John Huber.
ACTION REQUIRED:
1. Appointment of two Council members to the committee.
2. Appointment of five at -large citizens to the
committee.
3. Selection and appointment of a chair person.
KDF:madlr
MEMO
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
December 9, 1989
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Kevin F Administrator
Re: Policy of Community Use of City Hall
Attached is a draft a policy on community use of the rooms in
City Hall. The policy is rather straight forward, and speaks
for itself.
A key feature in the policy is that a Mendota Heights
resident must arrange and sign for use of a room. That
person is responsible for knowing how to use the building,
seeing that it gets locked up, etc. This is as an
alternative to having someone on site, i.e. a custodian,
which would be difficult and expensive for a small
organization like ours.
ACTION REQUIRED
Council should review the attached proposal, making whatever
changes it deems appropriate, then pass a motion adopting the
policy.
MEMO
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
December 8, 1988
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Kevin Fr
ty Administrator
_-,,��qi
Re: 1989 Salaries and Benefits for Non -Organized Employees
INTRODUCTION
Attached are two resolutions necessary to implement 1989
cost -of -living pay and benefit increases for employees not
covered by a labor contract. The purpose of this memo is to
briefly describe the contents of those resolutions.
PAYAIATTRIX
The first attached resolution adopts an amended pay matrix
for 1989, increasing all figures by 4%. I am recommending a
4% adjustment, based on trends in the Consumer Price Index,
running in the 4 - 5 % range, and on salary trends in other
metropolitan area suburbs for clerical, professional, and
managerial groups.
On August 1st, 1987, Council adopted a revised pay matrix to
implement the requirements of the comparable worth law,
and will recall that we are phasing in comparable worth
adjustments over a three-step process. The final step in
that process will come this August 1, 1989, when all
non -organized employees will be eligible to be at Step E on
the salary matrix. Action to make that final adjustment will
be recommended to Council next summer. The current action
before Council is to merely adjust the pay matrix in
recognition of cost -of -living.
The position of Administrative Assistant is inserted into the
resolution in Group XXIV, and our appointee will begin work
on January 4th at the Step A rate of $28,169. This is as
approved by Council at the December 6th meeting.
INDIVIDUAL SALARY ADJUSTMENTS
The second attached resolution sets forth a schedule of
individual 1989 salaries for employees not covered by a labor
contract. All adjustments, except for that of City
Administrator, are 4% over what the employee is earning for
1987. The salary for City Administrator is as discussed with
Council on December 6th. Employees whose salaries don't
fit exact steps on the matrix as discussed above are in a
temporary "in between" status on the way to full
implementation of comparable worth in August.
The two part-time positions of Fire Chief and Assistant Fire
Chief are extended 15% and 11% increases respectively, based
on the number of hours they are putting in on the job and as
provided for in the adopted budget. The hourly schedule for
firefighters is increased $ .25 for each class, which is
approximately 4%.
INSURANCE CONTRIBUTION
The resolution increases the City's maximum contribution for
each employee's insurance program by $20, to $205 per month.
MedCenters Health Plan, the program used by most employees,
is increasing their monthly rate from to $224.90 in 1988 to
$265.00 in 1989. Therefore, even with a City contribution
increase of $20 per month, employees will still see an
increase of approximately $20.00 in their own monthly
deduction for insurance. $205 is the amount already set in
the settled police and public works contracts for 1989.
BUDGET IMPACT
The cost of the salary increases, compounded by variable
fringe benefits (i.e. FICA, PERA, etc.) is approximately
$25,900. The cost of the insurance increase is $4,800.
Adequate funds are appropriated in the adopted 1989 budget
to cover these increases.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs with the 1989 salary and benefits changes
as outlined and recommended above, it should pass a motion
adopting each of the two attached resolutions.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
RESOLUTION AMENDING PAY CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE FOR
NON -ORGANIZED EMPLOYEES TO REFLECT A 4%
ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT FOR 1989
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 87-67, the City Council has
adopted a grade -and -step pay system for non -organized -city
employees that meets the requirements of MSA 471.991, the Pay
Equity Act; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to annually review the pay
matrix that is a part of that system for adjustment in
recognition of increases in cost of living; and
WHEREAS, based on salary trends in the metropolitan area
suburbs, and budgeted funds available, a 4% adjustment in the
matrix for 1989 is reasonable.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of
the City of Mendota Heights that the grade and Step Pay
Matrix attached hereto as Appendix A, is hereby adopted as
Appendix A of Resolution No. 87-67, adopted by the City
Council on July 7th, 1987.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights
this 19th day of December, 1988.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY OF
MENDOTA
HEIGHTS,
MINNESOTA
EMPLOYEE
POSITION
PLACEMENT AND PAY
CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE
RESOLUTION NO.
88- ATTACHMENT A
GRADE
A
B
C
D
E*
F
G
I
Clerk-Recept.
15,963
16,761
17,599
18,479
19,403
20,373
21,392
II
16,362
17,180
18,039
18,941
19,888
20,883
21,927
III
16,771
17,610
18,490
19,415
20,385
21,405
22,475
IV
17,190
18,050
18,952
19,900
20,895
21,940
23,037
V
17,620
18,501
19,426
20,397
21,417
22,488
23,613
VI
18,061
18,964
19,912
20,907
21,953
23,050
24,203
VII
18,512
19,438
20,410
21,430
22,502
23,627
24,808
VIII
18,975
19,924
20,920
21,966
23,064
24,217
25,428
IX
Secretary
19,449
20,422
21,443
22,515
23,641
24,823
26,064
X
19,936
20,932
21,979
23,078
24,232
25,443
26,716
XI
Sr. Secretary
20,434
21,456
22,528
23,655
24,838
26,079
27,383
XII
4
20,945
21,992
23,092
24,246
25,459
26,731
28,068
XIII
21,468
22,542
23,669
24,852
26,095
27,400
28,770
XIV
22,005
23,105
24,261
25,474
26,747
28,085
29,489
XV
22,555
23,683
24,867
26,111
27,416
28,787
30,226
XVI
Account., Eng. Tech.
4
23,119
24,275
25,489
26,763
28,101
29,507
30,982
XVII
23,697
24,882
26,126
27,432
28,804
30,244
31,756
XVIII
24,290
25,504
26,779
28,118
29,524
31,000
32,550
XIX
24,897
26,142
27,449
28,821
30,262
31,775
33,364
XX
25,519
26,795
28,135
29,542
31,019
32,570
34,198
XXI
26,157
27,465
28,838
30,280
31,794
33,384
35,053
XXII
26,811
28,152
29,559
31,037
32,589
34,219
35,929
XXIII
27,481
28,855
30,298
31,813
33,404
35,074
36,828
XXIV
Sr'. Eng. Tech., CEO,
28,168
29,577
31,056
32,608
34,239
35,951
37,748
Engineer, Adm. Asst.
XXV
28,873
30,316
31,832
33,424
35,095
36,850
38,692
XXVI
29,594
31,074
32,628
34,259
35,972
37,771
39,659
XXVII
30,334
31,851
33,444
35,116
36,872
38,715
40,651
XXVIII
31,093
32,647
34,280
35,994
37',793
39,683
41,667
XXIX
31,870
33,463
35,137
36,893
38,738
40,675
42,709
XXX
P.W. Supervisor
32,667
34,300
36,015
37,816
.39,707
41,692
43,777
XXXI
Sergeant
33,483
35,158
36,915
38,761
40,699
42,734
44,871
XXXII
34,320
36,036
37,838
39,730
41,717
43,803
45,993
XXXIII
35,178
36,937
38,784
40,723
42,760
44,898
47,143
XXXIV
36,058
37,861
39,754
41,742
43,829
46,020
48,321
XXXV
Pal. Chief, P.W. Dir.,
36,959
38,807
40,748
42,785
44,924
47,171
49,529
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION FOR CERTAIN
EMPLOYEES FOR 1989 AND ESTABLISHING CERTAIN OTHER BENEFITS
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a grade -and -step
pay system for certain full-time employees of the City; and
WHEREAS, based upon recommendation of the City
Administrator, Council has determined the appropriate
placement of each City position on a Grade, and the incumbent
employee on a Step; and
WHEREAS, it is also necessary to set salaries for
certain part-time employees, as well as fringe benefits for
full-time employees.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as
follows:
1. That the following schedule of salaries be implemented
effective January 1, 1989, for full-time employees:
Employee
Nancy Platz
Rebecca Birch
Kimberlee Blaeser
Carol Bakka
Diane Ward
Shirley Shannon
Guy Kullander
Klayton Eckles
Tom Knuth
Richard Gill
Paul Berg
Kevin Batchelder
Tom Olund
Larrie Mack
Donn Anderson
Dorance Wicks
Kathleen Swanson
Dennis Delmont
James Danielson
Kevin Frazell
Position Salary
Clerk/Receptionist
$17,599
Clerk/Receptionist
18,479
Secretary
22,515
Secretary
22,515
Secretary
22,515
Accountant
26,763
Engineering Technician
28,652
Civil Engineer I
32,608
Sr. Engineering Technician
33,168
Code Enforcement Officer
31,056
Code Enforcement Officer
33,168
Administrative Assistant
28,168
Public Works Superintendent
38,397
Police Sergeant
40,317
Police Sergeant
40,317
Police Sergeant
40,317
City Clerk
42,785
Police Chief
46,672
Public Works Director
46,672
City Administrator
50,500
2. That the following schedule of salaries be implemented
effective January 1, 1988 for part-time employees:
Employee Position Salary
John Maczko Fire chief $ 6,900
Bill Lerbs Assit. Fire Chief 3,990
3. That the following hourly rate of pay for volunteer
firefighters be implemented effective January 1, 1988:
0 - 1 years $6.50
1 - 5 years 7.00
5 years and over 7.50
Captain 8.00
4. That the City's maximum contribution toward insurance
premiums for full-time employees not covered by a
labor contract shall be $205 per month for 1989.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights
this 20th day of December, 1988.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS:1
By
Charles Mer tensotto
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
a
DECEMBER 13, 1988 r
TO: Mayor, City Council and Cit d�is rator
FROM: Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer
SUBJECT: Lexington/110 Redevelopment
HISTORY•
Based on proposals to redevelop the southeast corner of
Lexington and TH 110, it appears that the next step in the
financial process would be to obtain appraisals for the
parcels which might be purchased by the City.
We have obtained quotes from Davis and Lagerman whom we
have used previously, and Penfield Associates who have been
used extensively by the Dakota County HRA. If the purchase
was to go to condemnation,. it would be necessary to have the
appraisals reviewed. The HRA has suggested that Don
Hennessey is very good at this work, as well as being fast
and reasonable.
Attached are quotation letters from Blake Davis and Bill
Schwab detailing the estimated cost for the appraisals.
By Tuesday evening, we will know more about the progress
of discussion between Croix Oil and SOS for a friendly
purchase. The outcome of those discussions might amend staff
recommendations at the Council meeting.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council wishes to proceed, select an appraiser and
order the work to be done.
LES:madlr
attachments
DAVIS & LAGERMAN, INC.
218 ENDICOTT ON 4th STREET
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55 101
Telephone: (612) 293-1551
I REALTOR
CHANDLER B D"IS. M A I
BLAKE S. DAVIS. mDecember 8, 1988
Mr. Larry Shaughnessy
City of Mendota Heights
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120
Re: Appraisal Fee Quotation
Two Parcels
SE Corner Highway 110 and Lexington
Dear Mr. Shaughnessy:
Thank you very. much for contacting me with regard to your need
for appraisals of two parcels at the above intersection in
Mendota Heights. I am interested in doing that appraisal work and
by means of this letter I am quoting my fee to do so.
In estimating the fee to appraise these properties, I have
assumed that• no inventory, personal property, or equipment used
in the businesses would be included in my valuations. I have
further assumed that no business value would be included. For the
fees quoted here my valuation would include land and buildings
only.
To appraise the convenience store property on the corner my fee
would be $1,200. In addition, to appraise the furniture library
next to it the fee would be $700, a total for the two of them of
$1,900.
I could complete the appraisals within 30 days of my receipt from
you of a request to appraise them. The final product will be two
copies each of fully documented narrative appraisal reports
summarizing in detail my approaches to value and my final
conclusion of value. If there is additional information which you
require with regard to this matter, please feel free to get in
touch with me at any time. Meanwhile thank you again for the
opportunity to present this proposal to you.
Yours very truly,
Blake S. Davis
BSD/ns
J
Professional Full Service Appraisers
11170 - 60th Street No., Stillwater, MN 55082 (612) 439-2047
WILLIAM A. SCHWAB, CA -S, C.R.A.
President
JACK M. SWEDAHL, CRPA/S
Senior Staff Appraiser
DON G. NELSON, MRA
Stat/ Appraiser
PENREL.D, INC.
Serving All Areas of Appraisal Needs
December 9, 1988
Mr. Lawrence Shaughnessy
Treasurer
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN. 55118
Re: Proposal for Appraisal Services
Dear Mr. Shaughnessy,
Pursuant.to our telephone conversation, I offer the
following proposal for appraisal services for your
consideration:
1. Curley Furniture Store
i 2010 North Lexington
Complete appraisal report of the real estate -
estimated fee - $600.00
2. Service station and convenience store
adjacent to Curley Furniture Store
Complete appraisal report of the real estate -
estimated fee - $850.00
3. If equipment and fixture appraisals are needed
for relocation purposes, the fee is $450.00 per
business.
Our fee is based on an hourly charge of $60.00 per hour.
The maximum charge for the real estate appraisals would be
$1,690.00. The business equipment and fixture appraisals
would be $450.00 each, if needed. Any work beyond the
appraisal, such as assisting in acquisition or going through
condemnation, would be extra at our hourly rate.
Members of
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CERTIFIED APPRAISERS
MINNESOTA GOVERNMENTAL APPRAISERS
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
ST. PAUL BOARD OF REALTORS
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REVIEW APPRAISERS
INTERNATIONAL RIGHT OF WAY ASSOCIATION
SOCIETY OF REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS
WESTERN WISCONSIN BOARD OF REALTORS
Specialists In Appraising of Real Estate, Business Fixtures and Equipment
Thank you for contacting us. If there
please don't hesitate to contact me. I
to working with you. I have attached a
sional qualifications for your review.
Sincerely yours,
William A. Schwab, CA -S, C.R.A.
PENFIELD, INC.
WAS/mk
Attachments
are any questions,
am looking forward
copy of my profes-
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 12, 1988
TO: Mayor, City Council and City A s 9to r
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant for 1989
DISCUSSION:
The City of Mendota Heights is again eligible to request a portion of
Dakota Countyts Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for 1989•
CDBG is a federal program designed to meet the needs of low and moderate
income residents. In the past Mendota Heights' CDBG money has been gen-
erally used to assist with loans and deferred loans for rehabilitation of
single family homes together with assisting such special projects as, as-
sessment abatements on the Northend Street Project and the Cornick watermain
extension along Trunk Highway 13• The Cornick watermain project will
totally deplete the City's funds in 1988. Because there is no money re-
maining for housing rehabilitation, staff feels that the funds available for
1989 (approximately $37,000) should be used to restore that program.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends utilizing the Cityts available CDBG funds to establish
a housing rehabilitation loan deferral program (see attached application).
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they need to
pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 88-_, RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989 DAKOTA
COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING.
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1989 DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights as
follows:
1. The City Administrator is authorized to submit the attached application
to Dakota County for a Community Development Block Grant in Fiscal Year
1989.
2. The application is approved by the City Council and the Mayor and City
Clerk are authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Mendota
Heights. 1
3. That the Dakota County HRA be designated as the administrative entity
to carry out the program on behalf of the City.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 20th day of
December, 1988.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
Dakota County
Community Development Block Grant Proposal
Fiscal Year 1989
City of Mendota Heights
Legal Name of Applicant
1101 Victoria Curve
Legal Address of Applicant
Mendota Heights Minnesota
City State
Kevin Frazell
Contact Person
City Administrator _
Title
Mendota Heights Housing Rehabilitation Project
Project Name
of single family, owner -occupied dwellings
Brief Description of Project
$37,000
Amount Requested
Community Development
District
(612) 452-1850
Phone Number
55118
Zip
1. Has this project received funding CDBG before?
x Yes ( _ No
2. Project duration:
_ 9
_ ( One year
�X Other (Specify) : 1R mnnthe
Proposed beginning date: 5-1-89 Proposed completion date: 12-1-90
3. Grant funds will be used for: a
I X I
Acquisition
Clearance Activities
Disposition
Economic Development
Planning
Public Facilities
Public Services
Rehabilitation
Other (Specify):
4. Federal objective addressed (attach documentation):
1-1 Benefit to low and moderate income persons
Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight
Alleviation of urgent community development need
5. General description of the project (include project goals and
importance to community):
Provision of low interest and deferred loans for low and mnderate inrnme
homeowners. Any form of owner -occupied housing would be eligible.
For more information see Attachment A. The HRA may be able to leverage
additional funds through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency.
6. Description of project area (attach map):
The _project area consists of the entire corporate limits of the City
g
of Mendota Heights. (See attached map) y
7. Persons benefitting:
Total number of persons benefitting: 5 households
Percentage of low/moderate income: 100%
8. Construction schedule:
1,_1 Not applicable
x I Applicable
If applicable:
Estimated date construction will begin: May 1, 1989
Estimated date construction will be completed: December 1, 1990
9. Project cost:
Total project cost:
Amount of C. D. Grant requested: $ 37 , 000
(Percentage of total project cost): 50%
Source and amount of other revenue:
$ 37,000
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency $ 37,000
10. Budget summary by activity:
Activity CDBG Other/List Source Total
Housing rehabilitation $ 37,000 S 37,000 MHFA S 74,000
and related project $ S S
administration. $ S S
a
$ S S
-
Total $ 37,000 $ 37.000 S 74,nnn
- 3 -
11. Additional supporting items submitted -with proposal (check if
attached):
Benefitdocumentation
e�! ..qu e st i-o.n -4.).
7 Resolution of governing body requesting grant
Addition'al project information
I xI map or sketch outlining project area
Professional's certification of feasibility and accuracy of
scope and budget (engineer's, architect's, etc.)
Letters in support of project/or letters of commitment
Other (Specify):
Certification
I certify that the statements and application requirements of this
official proposal are correct and that this proposal contains no
misrepresentation or falsifications, omissions or concealment of material
facts and that the information given is true and complete to the best of MA,
knowledge and belief, and that no bids have been awarded, contract
executed, or construction begun on the proposed project.
December 20, 1988
Signature of Authorized Official Date
Mayor
Title
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 12, 1988
TO: Mayor, City Council and Ci
,t4 m ator
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Snowplowing
INTRODUCTION:
One of our "target" issues, and one that has recently provoked Council
discussions, is snowplowing. Staff was to review our current snowplowing
procedures to determine any areas of potential improvement, and particularly
to consider how the use of a private contractor might assist City crews in
completing removal more quickly. The purpose of this memo is to respond to
that Council directive.
DISCUSSION:
The City Administrator and I recently met with Public Works staff to
get their input on the subject and below is a list of some of their
thoughts:
1. In general Public Works staff feel that they are doing a good job
of plowing. I might add that I feel they are doing a commendable
job removing the snow considering the mileage per route. There
are now three main line plow routes with approximately 20 miles of
street per route. This mileage is at or above what the other
neighboring City's are doing per route. There are also two cul-
de-sac routes with about 90 cul-de-sacs. The Public Works staff
have always removed the snow as soon as any of the other neigh-
boring cities and they feel that they will be able to continue to
meet that goal this year even with the added mileage.
2. In order to improve their efficiency the Public Works staff has
suggested implementation of the following:
a. Public Works Superintendent Tom Olund will also plow snow
(he does now as a fill in or replacement when someone is
missing).
b. Depending on the weather forecast, the Superintendent
will consider beginning plowing earlier than it has in
the past, 1:00 or 2:00 A.M. instead of 3:00 or 4:00 A.M.
q.y., r. 1'Y' ,
c. The crews will begin plowing before the snowfall ends (in
the past they have always waited until the snow stopped
falling). However this will mean that a second pass may
be required of the earlier plowed streets.
3. Council budgeted in 1989 for a private contractor to help with the
plowing on significant snowfalls (one where people are unable to
get out before the streets are plowed). I have again contacted
Pine Bend Paving to help us with those snowfalls. Pine Bend is
only available after 8:00 A.M., and will be called out at the
discretion of the Public Works Superintendent. The Contractor
will concentrate on plowing neighborhood streets to assist getting
residents mobile as soon -as possible.
4. We have budgeted f or an additional maintenance worker to be hired
this summer. That person will be available for the 189/190 snow-
fall season. We plan to use that person to either start another
cul-de-sac route or replace the motor grader with a truck route.
We are presently plowing the center of the City with a motor
grader which only needs one person to operate, whereas a truck
needs two people. Trucks can plow faster than motor graders and
can sand.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Review the -above information on snowplowing, and indicate whether
Council wishes staff to proceed with their plan.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 12, 1988
T0: Mayor, City Council and Cit m�Ir ator
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: St. Paul Water Utility
Meter Program
DISCUSSION:
St. Paul Water Utility is installing remote water meter registers
throughout their system and needs City Council approval before they can
proceed in Mendota Heights (see attached diagram). Right now St. Paul's
meter readers have to enter every home to read the meters and with this new
system they will simply have to plug a device into a receptacle located on
the outside of the home. St. Paul Water Utility's experience with this
system in St. Paul has been fantastic the meter readers have gone from 70
reads per day to over 400 per day.
There will be no direct cost to the homeowners for this system as all
the costs are funded through water rate revenues. However should Mendota
Heights decide to revert to a wholesale water agreement the City will have
to pay the Water Utility for the system at an amount amortized over 30
years.
The meters are scheduled to be installed in Mendota Heights sometime
between August_7th and October 28, 1989• They have also agreed to set up a
display at the Mendota Heights City offices open house on January 15, 1989
to explain the system to anyone interested.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff feels that this new system of meter reading is excellent and
recommends that the City Council approve the agreement and allow St. Paul
Water Utility,to proceed.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should
pass a motion authorizing the Mayor and Administrator to sign the agreement.
t
— Cable
iR
Ground
"W
i ndoww
-TAIL
22 gauge, 4
!'(I T—
conductor, ' I
solid strand,
14
-'JiT
plastic coated,
thermostat type
4 0'",1,
uItlPt Ti tVr-,Ill.
Oil'
I - V
REMOTE WATER METERING SYSTEM
ri
TYPICAL
INSTALLATION
CP
3
3
#
qLi r I
I-
M�j
Remote meter
reading
receptacle
2
Attach wire to
house with cable
1. WATER METER & REGISTER
fasteners
Drill i/4". hole
2. CABLE.,
;,, ,.
MIN
2: through outside ;i
waLl, Hn j-.-st
3. REMOTE RECEPTACLE
See detail
or windw
casement i.
t
— Cable
iR
Ground
"W
i ndoww
-TAIL
22 gauge, 4
!'(I T—
conductor, ' I
solid strand,
-'JiT
plastic coated,
thermostat type
4 0'",1,
cable
Meter
CP
qLi r I
I-
M�j
t
— Cable
iR
Ground
wait
-TAIL
t
— Cable
iR
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
DECEMBER 15, 1988
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer
SUBJECT: Runway 4/22 Extension
HISTORY:
The Airports Commission has begun the process which
could lead to the extension of runway 4/22 toward the
southwest by some 2700 feet. A part of the process is
preparation of an EIS for the project.
The F.A.A. has issued an Environmental Assessment
Summary in preparation of the full EIS study. They have
invited comments on the procedure for the EIS and asked that
the comments be submitted by January 6.
Kevin, Bernie Friel, and I have reviewed the summary and
feel that little attention has been given to the affects of
the extension toward the northeast. The attached letter
refers to the areas we feel should be considered. If you
have other thoughts, please feel free to add them.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Decide if we should comment on the process, draft a
response and authorize forwarding of the comments to the
F.A.A.
LES:madlr
attachmentr
Cit .0fa, k I.
A
A
-Ai A,�i AJ, "Me
ndota Helghfs,'...,
A
December 21, 1988
Mr';; Franklin D. Benson, Manager
,U.S. Department of Transportation
..�;Federal Aviation Administration
Room •111
6301'- 34th Avenue South
-i-Minneapolis, NN 55450
Dear,Nr. Benson:
I want to thank you on behalf of the City of Mendota
Heights for the opportunity to respond to the elements of the
'proposed EIS Statement for the Runway 4/22 extension at
..Twin Cities International Airport.
From the Environmental;Assessment Summary which you have
sent us, we find that several elements of direct and serious
concern to the City of Mendota Heights have been omitted from:,.
4 -he%, _Q11YnTA:%_JbelieveWa hliaua +-hn+-',fhe following elements should
--receive complete review in the EIS which is to be prepared.
These items all affect the City's continuing attention to
",compatible land use in the City and our efforts to limit the
effects of the airport traffic and noise on our residents.
No mention has been made of the increased capacity
o; level at the airport resulting from the runway
extension.
The noise level and noise contours relating to
departures on runway 4 and arrivals on runway 22,
have not been developed. The use of these
procedures results in intense and objectionable
noise levels to an,entirely new group of residents
in the City and actsito make a sham of City zoning
efforts to be a comp4tible'neighbor to the airport.
There is no statement as to the development of
flight tracts to the'northeast of the airport for.,
either departures or'arrivals. The absence of these
tracts make it impossible to relate operations t0
the noise exposure s which will be received in these
areas of the city.
The current 180 day test'use of runway 22/4.has served
!'to show noise exposures above acceptable levels in an area,of
the City which has not been exposed in the past. These
'
operations should be stoppedpas soon as the test period is.
over .',and all departures, except for strict weather-related
operations, ceased.
1101 Victoria Curve -Mendota Heights, A&N - 55118 452.1850
tr
A
Mr. Franklin D. Benson, Manager
December 21, 1988 y
Page Two<:
3
It appears that the proposed runway extension will -
result in increased use of runway 29R/I1L. Operations on
this runway have a serious detrimental effect on our City
residents. The failure to direct traffic in the area of the
City, south of a 105 degree heading, which has been zoned to
accept aircraft traffic, is inexcusable and should be
reflected in the EIS. ;t
Very truly yours,
`
%
19
3
4
R
0
/./
�
�
Air44
MSP Runway
4�12
Environmental A
t Summary
.
.
Description
^ ....
..
' 1
, , .
'
1.3
Flight track modifications
. .. ..
...
1
Need & Justification of proposed
P�roject ,,,
'...
l
2^1
Noise Impact - Improvement
2.1.1 Technique . ^ . , ^ `
. , . . . .
3.1.2 Historical perapeotive`
'. , . . .
' '. .
. '� Z
2.2
Operational Improvement .
. '. .'. . .
. '. "
. �. 3
3.3.l �m�buig�e . , . . . .
.' .. .�^ . ,
. �. .
. � 2
^
2.'.�']Histor���l perspective
� ^ . . . . .
. . .
. } 3
Alternative's
., ,,,^ ,,,
.
^ ,,,,,','
' � ..
� 3
3^1
Objectives . . . . . . ,
-.
3
3.2
Development Alternatives .
. . . . . . .
. . .
. 3
3.3,1 Constraints . . . . .
.�F!. . . . . .
. . .
. ' 3
3.2,2 Diffe*randea . . . . ,
.''. . . . . .
.'�� . .
. 4
3.3
No -Build Alternative . , .
.. . . . . .
. . .
. 4
Impacts
of Proposed Project . .
.... , . . . .
.
5
4.1
Review of standard impacts
list . . . . .
,`�� . ^
. ' 5
4.3
identification of primary impacts
. . . .
.
5
4.3
Wetlands . . . . , . . . ,
. . ^ , , . . ,
�
. . . ,
. 5
4.4
C000troct|oo impacts . . ,
�
.... . . . . . .
.. . ,
. 5
4.6
Noise . . . , . . . , ^ .
. . . . .� . .
.�� . .
. ' @
Schedule for Review . , . ~ . .
`.
. .. . ^ ^ , , .
lb .
. /, . .
. 7
f-
°~
°
el.
^
.;
n�
,
�
0
/./
�
a
no
off
MSP Runway 4722
Environmental Assessment Summary
1 Description of Proposed Protect 14;
1.1 Sponsor (MAC)
(R4
The Metropolitan Airports Commission :(,MAC) is the own ' er and
operator of Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP) as
;1
well as six general aviation airports%in the greaterT,
, !4in Cities
area. As such, MAC is responsible forj..insuring accessto the
domestic and international air transportation systems I `t_ for the
Twin Cities area. At the same time, MAC is committe4j�,to
minimizing any adverse impacts relating to the operation of its
facilities. The proposed extension of'Runway.4-22 aiVMSP is
consistent with these dual responsibilities.
This environmental assessment (EA) isr7the first step,;in the
Federal environmental process to evaluate a 2,750' extension of
Runway 4-22 to the southwest consistent with the master plan for
MSP. The EA has been prepared in accordance with thee'
requirements of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)"'Order
5050.4A, Guidelines for Environmental,,Analysis.
'5
1.2 Runways/taxiwdys
The proposed project, as shown on Figure 1, involves the
extension of the southwest end of Runway 4-22 by 2,750'. The
landing thresholds for both ends would be displaced 2,750' from
the ends of pavement to maintain or improve landing profiles over
adjacent communities. These displacements are only possible with
the extension (See Figure 2). Taxiway and lighting system
changes related to the extension and threshold displacements are
also part of the proposed project.
is
1.3 Flight track modifications
Four departure tracks from Runway 22 will be established as part
of the project. They will be tracks turning to headings of 350
and 250 degrees, one to a southerly heading along Cedar Avenue
and one southeasterly up to 165 degrees. (Figure 3)
2 Need & Justification of Proposed Project
2.1 Noise Impact Improvement
2.1.1 Technique
The proposed project will improve the
aircraft operations at MSP by allowing
Preferential Runway System (PRS). The
noise impact pattern from
increased use!*.of the
PRS was devised to assign
priorities to aircraft routings so as�to disperse noise where
possible and to route operations over.`areas that arelthe least
sensitive to noise. However, the ability to use thefPRS has
;f
slii
MSP Runway 4
-22,
Environmental AssessmenC ' �'Summary
declined in recent years. As activity levels grow at MSP, the
use of the PRS will continue to decreasiand aircraft operations
(and noise) will be increasingly channeled along the
northwest/southeast corridor of theparallelrunways (11L -29R and
11R -29L). Runway 4-22', as the only alternative,to the.4
northwest/southeast traffic flow, is the key to' increased
utilization of the PRS. The extension to Runway 4-22 will
enhance the ability of the PRS to be used even at increased
activity levels. !W'
2.1.2 Historical perspective
4h
The importance of the PRS in the noiselabatement program at MSP
has been underscored by many groups anUstudies which deal with
the issue. Common to each is the recommendation to enhance the
effectiveness of the PRS.
Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC)
Environmental Advisory Team/1977 Airport Master Plan
Noise Implementation Working Group'' -) d
P
Noise Budget Working Group
2.2 Operational Improvement
2.2.1 Technique
The extension of Runway 4-22 increases the operational
effectiveness of the PRS from the current level of 60.,'
operations/hour to a level of 70-80 operations/hour. This
increase will allow the PRS to be used approximately nine hours
per day between the busy hours of 6:00AM and 11:00 PM at 1992
approach
activity levels. The PRS will never the parallel
runways in operational effectiveness,*'which is 105 toj,108
operations per hour depending on the direction of traffic flow.
It is because of its high capacity that the parallel operation
must be used during the peak traffic periods. Those peaks have
been increasing in the last three years, reducing theiltimes the
PRS can be used.
The increase in operations per hour afforded by the runway
extension results from the availability of increased runway
length south of the intersection of Runways 4-22 and 11L -29R.
The extension will provide 8,256 feet south of the intersection,
sufficient for most aircraft operations at MSP. Consequently-,
those operations could use Runway 22 independently o "t, unway
j1L-29RL__ql1owin9 simultaneous use of--bo-th runways and gen-e—raXing
the additional
--------
The extension of Runway 4-22 will increase the maximum runway
length available at MSP to 11,000 feet)from the existing maximum
of 10,000' on Runway 11R -29L. This additional runway6length will
-2-
1411.,
MSP Runway 1722 k�
Environmental Assessment Summary .Y.
-4
X14 i
not result in additional types of aircraft using the airport but
allow those aircraft that now operateat MSP to operate on longer
stage lengths, e.g. non-stop serviceq to Europe and the Orient.
2.2.2 Historical perspective
The extension of Runway 4-22 has been a part of the facility plan
for MSP since the 1977 master plan. Subsequent_ events have given
added importance to the operational improvements afforded by the
extension. Deregulation, the Northwest/Republic merger and the
development of MSP as an air travel hub are all factors which
have increased traffic to the point Where the airport's maximum
hourly operations configuration, the,tparallel runway operation,
is required for a'greater portion of the day. The PRS is used
less as a consequence. It
js r
•S
Additionally, the recent growth of international traffic has
increased the need for runway lengthrover that whichris currently
available. Without the required runway length, aircraft weight
must be reduced, requiring a refueling enroute or a restriction
on the number of seats that can be filled, reducing the
efficiency and level of service originating at MSP.
r
Both operational enhancements described above are addressed by
the proposed extension of Runway 4-22.
3 Alternatives
3-
3.1 Objectives «*
'k s
The objective against which projects,are measured in�'this EA is
to increase use of the PRS, thereby reducing and more equally
distributing aircraft noise impacts in the area around MSP. This
objective must be met in a way which does not restrict the
ability of MSP to fulfill its role intthe Metropolitan Aviation
System and generate significant, regional economic benefits.`'
This requires a secondary objective for the proposed improvements
to improve the ability of MSP to accommodate the increasing
number of long haul flight segments.10�I #
3.2 Development Alternatives
V
3.2.1 Constraints F
•�i�, ti A
7�
No alternatives which considered achieving the objective by
developing another major airport site in the Twin Cities area
were actively pursued. Such alternatives are inconsistent with
longstanding regional planning which1has designated4IMSP as the
only•Major airport in the area. Additionally, even if another
airport were determined to be required, the time required to
55,
—3—
',r •v;
r}
MSP Runway 4-22
Environmental Assessment Summary
4
develop it would be at least ten years;- During that gime, MSP
would continue to operate and the noise concerns of its neighbors
could not be ignored during that significant period of,.*$,time.
J"
The on -airport alternatives consideredgwere fashioned oby certain
physical constraints. The surrounding"iroadway system,,c.the
availability of adequate space for runway clear zones and
consistency with previous airport planning were considered in
picking alternatiVes that met the objective. All the6e
alternatives confine the constructionjof facilities to existing
airport boundaries.
C1.
3.2.2 Differences 3
The EA analyzed the impacts of five development alternatives; 1,
1A, 1B, IC, and 2. Alternatives 1 and12 differ only in the
location of the landing threshold for Runway 4. The latter has
the threshold moved 1,000' further to the southwest from its
existing position while the former retains the Runway44 threshold
in its present location. Both alternatives make the entire
runway pavement available for take -off.. (See Figure 2)
Alternatives 1A, 1B and 1C embody thetsame runway geometry as
Alternative 1 but incorporate different departure flight tracks
from Runway 22. Alternative 1A has four tracks, Alternative 1B,
two tracks and Alternative 1C one track. While one or two flight
tracks allow the confinement of aircraft noise to somewhat more
defined areas, there is a loss in operational flexibility as a
result of such restrictions. Air traffic controllers.must space
departures from one another and, if they cannot do itilaterally
along several different tracks, they must hold departures on the
runway for in -trail separation. Thisi-reduces the number of
departures that can be accommodated otf..7a runway in any period of
time. In the case of Runway 4-22, reduction of hourlyoperations
means a reduction of the amount of time the PRS can be,used. For
this reason, alternative 1A was considered with as many departure
tracks as at present (four) but with a,realignment of).r:two of them
to overfly less noise sensitive areasst-
3.3 No -Build Alternative
The no -build alternative assumes no runway extension at MSP. It
is used throughout the EA as the "base.icase" againstxyhich the
development alternatives are compared.7., This alternative was
discounted as a viable future option,,because it neither increases
the use of the PRS nor increases runway length for international
service.
Sa
Rk 4
-4-
I
I
Im
4
MSP Runway 4-22'
Environmental Assessment Summary
4 Impacts of Proposed Project
4.1 Review of standard impacts list
The EA considered a full range of areas of potentialtimpact from
the proposed project.' These areas aretprescribed byrFAA Order
5050.4A. The areas analyzed are listed below: 11* 1
Aircraft Noise Compatible LandiUse . 411-1
Social Impacts Induced!?Socioeconomic Impacts
Air Quality Water Quality 1A
DOT 4(f) Lands Historic, Architectural"O,Archaeo-
Biotic Communities logical & Cultural Resources
Endangered/Threatened Wetlands
Species Floodplains
Coastal Zone Mgt. Coastal'Barriers
Wild & Scenic Rivers Farmland~
Energy & Natural Light Emissions
Resources
'fly
4.2 Identification of primary impactsc 7b
Of the areas analyzed, only three are:of sufficient magnitude to
warrant discussion in this summary. The three areas'are
Wetlands, Construction Impacts and Aircraft Noise. Each is
summarized below.
4.3 Wetlands ai orf:
A one half acre marsh is located in the project areat'O
approximately 1,600 feet southwest offthe existing Runway 4 end
and 750 feet southeast of the extended centerline. The marsh
will have to be filled to extend Taxiway D to the extended Runway
4 end. The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act and Executive -
Order 11990, Protection of Wetlands,frequire compensation of this
unavoidable impact. Mitigation planslagreed to between MAC and
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service call for the enlargement of
Duck Lake on airport property by 0.25 to 0.30 acres to a depth of
no more than 12 inches.
4.4 Construction impacts
Ile
The runway extension will be undertaken concurrentlyL'with a
rehabilitation of the runway. Both projects represent a
significant amount of construction activity. Routing of
construction vehicles, control of airborne dust and prevention of
sedimentation of drainage systems are'normal parts of the
mitigation plan for such a construction project and will be
undertaken at MSP. Additionally, therrehabilitation of the
runway and the construction of the portion of the extension
closest to the existing end of pavement will require ;the closure
of Runway 4-22 for some periods of time. MAC will work with the
MSP Runway 4-22
Environmental Assessment Summary
engineer and contractor for the project; ,to minimize these down
times. MAC has begun the process of minimizing down time by
delaying the rehabilitation project so as to be coordinated with
the runway extension. This will limit,*runway down times to the
minimum.
4.5 Noise
q-A -
The proposed project will not result in the creation of any
additional noise at MSP. The 1992 activity levels used
throughout the analysis will occur with or without the -project.
The effect of the project will be to increase the time-the PRS is
used which has the effect of dispersing aircraft noise'.
Consequently, the noise analysis concentrated on the !?,*
effectiveness of the alternatives in achieving this dispersal.
The conclusions of that analysis are given below and summarized
in Table 1. 11
A. The increased use of the PRS, which could occur with the
extension, would result in the shift of between 236 and 249 daily
flights off the northwest end of Runways 11-29 to the'Iscuthwest
end of Runway 4-22 whenever the PRS can be used.
Jta
B. Though the highest noise levels remain in South Minneapolis,
the increased use of the PRS afforded by the project produces a
more even distribution of noise in the environs of MSP than the
"no build" alternative.
C. The operations are shifted from South Minneapolis and
Richfield north of 70th Street, where there is no opportunity to
channelize overflights along less noise sensitive areas, to
Bloomington and Richfield south of 70th Street, wherethis
opportunity exists along the Cedar Avenue and 1-494 corridors.
D. The amount of the shift of operations depends upon.-the
availability of flight tracks along which ATC personnel can
disperse Runway 22 departures. Alternative 1A represents a
compromise between the Alternative 1 options which are most
restrictive with respect to Runway 22"departure tracks (1C) and
those which are least restrictive (10,�1B).
14,
E. The difference between the noise benefits associated with the
devel;pment alternatives are generallyismall.1
F. Overall Ldn noise benefits are achieved with the development
alternatives. 5!
G. Alternative 1A is based upon an operational scenario which is
acceptable to FAA from a safety and traffic management
perspective, and additionally has noise benefits consistent with
the statement of purpose of the project. Ery
-6- 11,:w
MSP Runway 4 -22 -
Environmental Assessment Summary 134
H. Alternative 1A is the preferred alternative.
ak_
5 Schedule for Review
In accordance with the procedures specified in FAA Order 5050.4A,
the EA will be reviewed by the FAA to determine whether to issue
a "finding of no significant impact" (FONSI) or to call for
further environmental analysis in an environmental impact
statement (EIS). The review by the FAA -should, result4in a
determination by.Summer, 1988. apr
PiP
0a
{Alf
4�
-7-
A
N MINNEAPOLIS
SAINT PAUL
,11L L -J A,96
2750' DISPLACED
11R THRESHOLD
:, . RICHiXLD OF
•' 235W DISPLACI
TIMESHOLD
i 275W
RUNWAY EXT.
WF-
NTUMA M 4"
BLOOMINOTON
lb
29 IOTA
HEIGHTS
EAOAN
r.nWa �.��►�. - ..�ci`r maV . Www �-�w �jMw:°. .s - �.�li.. � - � .j1 a� .. Pn ..ii.�..= ` °°f � «� _
go
m
0
m
O
0�
(A
�°
rn
v
�
�
N
M
N
0
m
D
cm
D
rn
A
N MINNEAPOLIS
SAINT PAUL
,11L L -J A,96
2750' DISPLACED
11R THRESHOLD
:, . RICHiXLD OF
•' 235W DISPLACI
TIMESHOLD
i 275W
RUNWAY EXT.
WF-
NTUMA M 4"
BLOOMINOTON
lb
29 IOTA
HEIGHTS
EAOAN
r.nWa �.��►�. - ..�ci`r maV . Www �-�w �jMw:°. .s - �.�li.. � - � .j1 a� .. Pn ..ii.�..= ` °°f � «� _
O
n
D
�i
o
i
C
O
m
o
A
N MINNEAPOLIS
SAINT PAUL
,11L L -J A,96
2750' DISPLACED
11R THRESHOLD
:, . RICHiXLD OF
•' 235W DISPLACI
TIMESHOLD
i 275W
RUNWAY EXT.
WF-
NTUMA M 4"
BLOOMINOTON
lb
29 IOTA
HEIGHTS
EAOAN
r.nWa �.��►�. - ..�ci`r maV . Www �-�w �jMw:°. .s - �.�li.. � - � .j1 a� .. Pn ..ii.�..= ` °°f � «� _
0%
0
C!
DISPLACEMENT
OV,
%pry
THRESHOLDS 4-
Olet.
2750 2756*
ALT.��1
1750 2750
ALT.0 .2
0.0
22
e
MSP 4/22 EA N' P, NOT TO SCALE
FIGURE
THRESHOLD ALTERNATIVES c mponles 2
,,, 'i
ALTERNATIVE 1At
I
bl
350 HDG6
250 HDGw
SOUTHERLY --000-
DEPARTURE TURN
M
a
30
M
M
z
C
M
41�
vt 41tw
1-494
EAST OF 166:)WADINQ MUST BE
COORDINATED. WITH
RUNWAY 29L ARRIVALS
PROPOSED LIMIT Oc'"
RUNWAY 29L
APPROACH CONTROL
DESCENT AREA
165 MDG.
0�lYN� 5t,
41.
MSP 4/22 EA NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED FLIGHT TRACKS' T K FIGURE
RUNWAY 22 DEPARTURES companies 3
MSP RUNWAY 4-22 EXTENSION EI
SUMMARY Of CHARGES IN NOISE iMPACTB
This is below
perceivable Dols*
Increments.
Sources Howard Needles Tammren 6 Bergeodoff
1992
1992
1992
1992
Alternative lA
Alternative 15
Existing
No Build
1"2
- 13,700 person
Nolse Index
Conditions
Alternative
Alternative 1
to Ldo 65.
Ldn Noise L*v*I■
Comparlmm of
- 13,200 person
- 12,900 persons
- 7,400 Minn,
residents in
-Build G 'No-
in Ldo 65.
in Ida 65.
Idn 65.
idn 65.
Build' alter-
- 10,600 Minn.
- 7,300 Minn.
- 2,200 person
- 3,200 person
natives only.
residents in
residents in
to Ldn 65 in
in Ida 65 in
Bloomington.
Ldn 65.
lda 65.
Bloomington.
Saw as Alt. 1.
Same as Alt. 1.
- No Ldn 65 in
- 2,700 person
Airport.
Bloomington.
in Lda 65 in
533 arrivals
Bloomington.
or
Overflights
Areas Ni of
Areas W of
Areas NN of
Airport.
Airport.
Airport.
537 arrivals
585 arrivals
533 arrivals
or
or
or
356 departures
541 departures
292 departures
Areas SH of
Areas SN of
Areas SN of
Airport.
Airport.
Airport.
11 arrivals
12 arrivals
64 arrivals
or
or
or
192 departures
56 departures
305 departures
?lme-Abov*-
Leon,of
-
Qp to 11.8 mins.
N/A
i •xA. Thresbold
'No -Build•
in 8. Minn.
"'
Holse Levels
and Alt. IA
up to 0.4 mine.
4
`
only.
in Bloomington
w
(Nest of Cedar)
L1065
No
Runway 22
Runway 22
evaluation.
departure
departures
22,700 populo-
38,300 popule-
ation.
atlon.
Increase in s7,
Richfield aced
Bloomington.
..a ---maximum is
Base against
, Increase in
Same as Alt. 1.
Bingle -event
which alterna-
single -event
Noise Levels
are evaluated.
of up 1.4 dBA.
This is below
perceivable Dols*
Increments.
Sources Howard Needles Tammren 6 Bergeodoff
1992
1992
1992
1992
Alternative lA
Alternative 15
Alternative 1C
Alternative 2
- 12,900 persons
- 13,700 person
- 12.500 person
- 12,900 persons
In Ldn 65.
in talo 65.
to Ldo 65.
in Lha 65.
- 7,300 Minn.
- 7,300 Minn.
- 7,200 Minn.
- 7,400 Minn,
residents in
residents In
residents in
residents in
Idn 65.
idn 65.
Ldn 65.
Ldn 65.
- 3,000 persons
- 2,200 person
- 3,200 person
- 2,600 person
in tan 65 in
in Ldo 65 in
to Ldn 65 in
in Ida 65 in
Bloomington.
Bloomington.
Bloomington.
Bloomington.
Saw as Alt. 1.
Same as Alt. 1.
Areas HN of
Same as Alt. 1.
Airport.
533 arrivals
or
305 departures
Areas SN of
Airport.
64 arrivals
or
292 departures
U 0.0 wins. N/A'."$ „�;"��'+�: .N A'f`i
"
in e. Minn.
up to 4.4 mins.
In Bloomington
(Nest of Cedar)
Runway 22
Rummy 22
Runway 22 Same as Alt, 1.
departures
departures
departures
32,300 popula-
30,700 popula-
17,600 populs-
ation.
atlan.
stlon.
Increase in
Increase in
Reduction in
-
Richfield Dad
y
--Richfield and '^" _ Richfield due
Bloomington.
Bloomington.
to cbaonelisa-
tion in Cedar
Avenue.
Same as Alt. 1.
Same as Alt. 1.
Same as Alt. 1.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
DECEMBER 9, 1988
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. l VCity Administrator
SUBJECT: Dakota County Legislative Program
With the increasing activism of the Minnesota
legislature in local affairs, cities everywhere are being
organized for the 1989 session. Dakota County is no
exception.
For the last three months, the County Administrator and
the city managers and administrators from communities in
Dakota County have been meeting to discuss pending issues of
particular concern to Dakota County and its communities.
Attached are draft policy statements on a number of those
issues.
As you can see from the attached memo, a county -wide
legislative dinner is planned for the evening of Thursday,
January 19. All legislators from Dakota County will be
invited, and all local officials strongly encouraged to
attend. The purpose will be to present the attached issues
to the legislators, and hopefully demonstrate the solidarity
of local officials throughout the county on these issues.
ACTION REQUIRED:
At this point, the managers are seeking input from each
city council. Please review the draft policies, and offer
your reactions, thoughts, or suggestions for changes.
KDF:madlr
attachment
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 129 1988
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Fins, Convenience Mart
DISCUSSION:
At the last City Council meeting Councilmembers asked staff how it
occurred that the Fina Service Station was completing remodeling work to add
a convenience store to.their gas station without City Council approval of
the permit. Staff was unable to answer that question at the meetings but
have now pieced together the following chain of events:
1. The service station representatives met ' with Howard Dahlgren to
discuss the possibility of expanding retail sales within their existing
service station space. Mr. Dahlgren reviewed the City's Ordinance for a B-2
district and found that what they requested was a permitted use within the
District (Tom Thumb is already in operation nearby). He informed them of
this and instructed them to simply apply for a building permit. He also
reviewed their plans and told them some modification to make before he would
approve of their request.
2. Fina then submitted an applicationfor the building permit and Paul
Berg was doing the plan review. The review was not completed before Paul
left for his two week Florida vacation so he passed the permit to Dick Gill
to finish up. Paul listed the items that were still needed from Fins, but
did not list that after those items were completed the permit needed to go
to Council. Dick assumed that the items Paul listed were as a result of a
Council review and after they were met, he issued the permit.
3. Councilmembers noticed the construction and inquired of staff at
the last meeting about what was going on? Council recalled a committment
from the gas station representatives at a previous meeting that they would
not have a convenience store (see attached Council minutes). ,
I also have had a discussion with Mr. Al Deininger, the Fina engineer
in charge of the project as to what his comments would be to Council ques-
tions:
1. Mr. Deininger was an employee of Getty Oil when he told the Council
that they did not plan on adding a convenience store. He was truthful in
answering the question because Getty did not plan on having a convenience
store.
2. Getty then sold to Texeco and then Texeco started selling some
convenience items at the station. That was the situation when Fina recently
purchased the station.
3. Fina does not consider this expanded operation a "Convenience
Store" such as Tom Thumb. They feel that they are a gas station, selling a
limited amount of retail items to.compliment that gas station.
I also talked with City Attorney Sherm Winthrop concerning the condi-
tional use permit, he told me that the Court ordered the City to issue the
conditional use permit and that there was nothing in that Court order that
prohibits the City from issuing a permit to allow retail sales from the
station.
RECOMMENDATION:
Inasmuch as staff has erroneously issued a permit to Fina without
Council permission and the use is legal, we feel that the City could be
liable for damages should Council withdraw the permit.
ACTION REQUIRED:
I
Mr. Al Deininger, Fins. Oil Company, will be present to answer questions
from Council and request Council to authorize the building permit. Council
needs to ask any questions they might have of Mr. Deininger and then deter-
mine a course of action.
After further discussion, Mayor Lockwood moved that a building
permit be granted to allow the contractor to finish up what
was started on the interior of the building, per se, except
the lighting and signing, conditioned upon the applicant
agreeing to whatever conditions the City Council shall deem
proper for the operation of the station, the location of the
sign and the lighting and approval of staff.
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 2
Nays: 3, Losleben,
Mertensotio and Hartmann
The motion did not carry and the applicants were advised to
return to the July 6th Council meeting with more details on
the proposed lighting scheme and sign information. Staff
was directed to contact Mr. Deininger to let him know what the
City desires.
Page No. 1668
June 15, 1982
t�
�0 BUILDING
Mr. Al Deininger, from Getty Oil and Mr. Bill Richie, were
Pt IT REQUEST
present to discuss their proposed remodeling plans for the
Surfco Gas Station at 1960.Dodd Road. The remodeling is to
allow the-station to become self-service, and is not intended
to be a convenience store. They noted that the•new lighting
to be installed will be less bright that what is there now and
that the light will be cast down, rather than out and around.
Mr. Richie noted that there is a similar station located in
Cannon Falls and one in South St. Paul, if the Council desired
to observe these. It was noted that the original conditional
use permit was granted to Skelly Oil in 1972, to allow the
station to be in operation. Mr. Deininger noted that Skelly
merged With Getty, so technically they are the same owner.
He also noted that the exterior of the building will have
a sand•tone painted rough sawn cedar exterior.
Councilman Losleben expressed concern over the new type of
lighting to be installed and also questioned the location of
the new sign. He felt that the Council should address all'areas
of the building permit, rather than just one phase of it at
a time.
After further discussion, Mayor Lockwood moved that a building
permit be granted to allow the contractor to finish up what
was started on the interior of the building, per se, except
the lighting and signing, conditioned upon the applicant
agreeing to whatever conditions the City Council shall deem
proper for the operation of the station, the location of the
sign and the lighting and approval of staff.
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 2
Nays: 3, Losleben,
Mertensotio and Hartmann
The motion did not carry and the applicants were advised to
return to the July 6th Council meeting with more details on
the proposed lighting scheme and sign information. Staff
was directed to contact Mr. Deininger to let him know what the
City desires.
MEMO
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
December 6, 1988
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Kevin Fr 2V]O, C�ity Administrator
Re: Add -On Agenda for December 6th
Four new items are recommended for addition to this evening's
agenda, one of them a consent calendar item. Additional
information is submitted for one item already scheduled.
3. Agenda Adoption
It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda
printed on blue paper.
5.i. Delinquent Sewer Bill Resolution
Attached is the resolution adopting assessments for
delinquent sewer bills. Council should pass a motion
adopting Resolution 88-93.
10.d. Appointment of Administrative Assistant
Please see attached memo from City Administrator Kevin
Frazell.
10.f. Purchase of Furniture
Please see attached memo from City Clerk Kathy Swanson
10.g. Discussion of Lexington 110 Redevelopment Project
Councilmember Blesener has requested that this item be added
to this evening's agenda so that she may share some thoughts
she has developed on this project since our workshop last
Thursday.
10.h. CDBG Grant Application
It is that time of the year when we are invited to apply for
our share of the Dakota County entitlement under the
Community Development Block Grant Program. County staff
indicates that we should expect only about $37,000 in 1989.
As we have depleted our existing allottments with the Cornick
water main project, City staff recommends that we request the
$37,000 for additional housing rehabilitation applications.
However, if Council has other thoughts, please share them.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 6, 1988
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Delinquent Sewer Billings
DISCUSSION
The attached resolution asking to certify delinquent
sewer accounts*is sixty-one names long and totals nearly
$11,076.50. Included in this year's list are two commercial
accounts whose outstanding balance total $2,552.30. There
have been several payments made, and we are still expecting
to receive several payments later this week.
It is necessary to have your approval tonight, as the
delinquency resolution needs to be delivered to Dakota County
no later than this Friday, December 9, 1988.
ACTION REQUIRED
Council should approve the attached Resolution No. 88 -
"Resolution Certifying Delinquent Sanitary Sewer Rental
Charges to the Dakota County Auditor for Collection With Real
Estate Taxes."
KMS:kkb
CITY OF MENDQTA HEIGHTS
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NOi 88 -
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT SANITARY SEWER RENTAL
CHARGES TO THE DAKOTA COUNTY AUDITOR FOR COLLECTION
WITH REAL ESTATE TAXES
WHEREAS, under the provisions of Ordinance No. 803 adopted by the City
Council of Mendota Heights on August 6, 1974, it is provided that if sewer
rental charges due the City for the use of the City's sanitary sewer system
are not paid within thirty (30) days after the mailing of a statement
therefore, the same shall be collected and the collection thereof enforced
in the same manner in all respects as county and state real estate taxes
subject to like penalty, costs and interest charges, and
WHEREAS. the City Clerk has advised the City Council that the total
aewer rental charges due the City as of December 15, 1988, for sanitary
sewer service furnished the properties hereinafter described situated within
the City have not been paid, and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has further advised the City Council that a
written statement for said sewer rental charges due the City as of December
179 1987, has been sent to the last known owner of said properties and that
more than thirty (30) days have elapsed since the mailing of said statementw
and
said properties are all situated in the City of Mendota
Heights in Dakota Countyr Minnesota and the legal description of said
properties, the name and address of the last known owner thereof, and the
total amount of sanitary sewer rental charges due for each of said parcels
through December 18, 1988, are more particularly described as follows:
Name and Address Legal Description Total Amount
M. Coonan
2237 Apache Street 153.10
Bernard Abramson
688 Arcadia Drive 255.40
Paul ML Esch
776 Bachelor Avenue 134.10
W. Haider
M. Clasen
929 Chippewa Avenue
M. Regan
992 Chippewa Avenue
J. Ernst
1003 Chippewa Avenue
C. Lennon
1063 Chippewa Avenue
R. Klingel
1930 Coventry Court
M. Frowick
766 Creek Avenue
A. Hanzal
771 Creek Avenue
R. Alvarez
1167 Dodd Road
R. Emery
1183 Dodd Road
R. Zevnick
1254 Dodd Road
C. Seivers
956 Douglas Road
B. Marvy
970 Douglas Road
Schwab
753 Evergreen Knoll
P. Schwartz
530 Fremont Avenue
Zapata
536 Fremont Avenue
Baker
680 S. Freeway Road
Isaac
662 Fourth Avenue
Mrozinski
595 Highway 110
80.00
60.60
106.80
56.00
80.00
97.50
198.20
106.00
151.10
54.00
61.60
80.00
98.60
141.00
106.00
106.00
184.00
248.30
Shade
649 Highway 110
Sirek
1219 Highway 110
Gove
755 Hilltop Road
Hahn
1132 Ivy Hill Drive
Katz
1747 James Road
Exner
531 Junction Lane
Kanevsky
750 Keokuk Lane
Hlustin
1686 Lilac Lane
Goff
675 West Marie Avenue
Tuminelly
1400 Medora Road
Anderson
751 Mohican Lane
Engelmann
1779 Overlook Lane
Rutman
1043 Overlook Lane
Henderson
1095 Overlook Road
O'Rourke
714 Pontiac Place
Samelian
920 Rae Court
Gohl
924 Rae Court
DeLaPlante
1901 South Lane
80.00
240.00
76.00
112.40
354.30
138.10
139.90
142.20
196.50
296.10
138.80
243.30
102.40
168.50
108.00
141.20
301.60
80.00
Dunst
645 Third Avenue
Rothstein
1292 Sylvandale Road
Gilkey
1780 Sutton Lane
Hannah
1738 Sutton Lane
Mathe
1722 Sutton Lane
Nichols
1794 Summit Lane
Peterson
2066 Theresa Street
Resident
678 Third Avenue
Larson
717 Third Avenue
Yale
2165 Timmy Street
Resident
2166 Timmy Street
Krebsbach
1832 Twin Circle Drive
Lange
779 Upper Colonial Drive
Brown
1775 Victoria Road
Walsh
1316 Wachtler Avenue
Triviski
1456 Wachtler Avenue
Sterling
910 Wagon Wheel Trail
Bonfe
1875 Walsh Lane
126.60
134.20
89.40
103.10
126.70
169.60
126.20
251.20
114.40
288.40
169.00
145.40
169.60
69.40
136.00
60.60
116.80
199.90
Gannaway
590 Winston Court
Leo Partnership
2422 Enterprise Drive
Investment Company I
1385 Mendota Heights Road
• 19@. 9Qi
1, @38: 30
1, 514.00
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HE:REHY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City 9f
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 4s follows: ;
I
1) That the total of ;Raid sanitary sewer rental charges set forth
above is hereby adnpted and confirmed as the proper unpaid sanitary
sewer, rental charg&s due for the above described properties through
December 15, 1988,tfor each of said lots, pieces and parcels of
land respectively, and the current charge against each such parcel
of land shall be alien concurrent with general taxes upcjn such
parcels and all thereof.
2) That the total amount of said sanitary sewer rental charges shall
be payable with ge:eral taxes for the year 1987 collectible in 1988
(now designated by'Statute as real estate taxes payable In 1988).
3) That the City Clerk shall prepare and transmit to the County
Auditor a certified copy of this resolution with the req(test that
each of said amounis shall be extended upon the proper t x lists of
the County to be thereafter collected in the manner provided by
law. '
s �
4) That a $25.00 service charge will be added to each delinquent sewer
account in accorda0ce with Ordinance No. 157 amending Ordinance No.
8@3.
Adopted by the City Council, of the City of Mendota Heights this 6th day of
December, 1988.
t
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS a
By
Charles E. Mertensotto',
Mayor
a
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
MEMO
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
December 6, 1988
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Kevin Fr,yty Administrator
Re: Appointment of Administrative Assistant
Council has already received my recommendation that Kevin
Batchelder be appointed to the position of Administrative
Assistant. The reasons for my recommendation, and a copy of
Kevin's resume, were included with the packet already sent to
you. I would be happy to answer any further questions you
may have about -this candidate.
SALARY CLASSIFICATION
Attached is a copy of the City's 1988 Salary Matrix
Resolution. When we adopt the new resolution for 1989
(which will be done at the December 20th meeting), it would
be my recommendation that the position of Administrative
Assistant be classified in Group XXIV. This is the same
class as has the positions of Sr. Engineering Technician,
Code Enforcement Officer, and Engineer. This classification
seems to make sense, both from an internal equity standpoint,
and in comparison with the salaries beginning paid by other
communities for similar positions
Assuming that the salary matrix is increased 4% for 1989, as
anticipated in the budget, the salary progression for the
Administrative Assistant would then be:
Beginning $28,169
6 Months 29,577
1 Year 31,056
2 Years 32,609
3 Years 34,240
The beginning salary on January 4th would be the $28,169.
With an increase to the 6 month rate in the second half of
the year, the annual compensation would average $28,873.
$30,000 was allocated in the 1989 budget. The difference
could cover memberships and training opportunities
in which Kevin is interested, and which would normally
accorded to an Assistant. The remaining benefits would the
same as received by other full-time employees.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs with the recommendation, it should pass a
motion appointing Kevin Batchelder to the position of
Administrative Assistant, effective January 4, 1988, and
directing staff to classify the position in Group XXIV on the
City's 1989 Salary Matrix.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
EMPLOYEE POSITION PLACEMENT AND PAY CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE
RESOLUTION NO. 87- , ATTACHMENT A
GRADE A 6 C D E• F G
I Clerk -Receptionist 15,349 16,117 16,923 17,769 18,657 19,590 20,570
11 15,733 16,520 17,346 18,213 19,124 20,080 21,084
111 16,126 16,933 17,779 18,668 19,602 20,582 21,611
IV 16,530 17,356 18,224 19,135 20,092 21,096 22,151
V 16,943 17,790 18,679 19,613 20,594 21,624 22,705
VI
17,366
18,235
19,146
20,104
21,109
22,164
23,273
VII
17,801
18;691
19,625
20,606
21,637
22,719
23,854
Vill
18,246
19,158
20,116
21,122
22,178
23,286
24,451
IX
Secretary
18,702
19,637
20,619
21,650
22,732
23,869
25,062
X
19,169
20,128
21,134
22,191
23,300
24,465
25,689
XI
Senior Secretary
19,648
20,631
21,662
22,746
23,883
25,077
26,331
x11
20,140
21,147
22,204
23,314
24,480
25,704
26,989
XIII
20,643
21,675
22,759
23,897
25,092
26,347
27,664
xIV
21,159
22,217
23,328
24,494
25,719
27,005
28,355
XV
21,688
22,773
23,911
25,107
26,362
27,680
29,064
XVI
Accountant, Engineering Technician
22,230
23,342
24,509
25,735
27,021
28,372
29,791
XVII
22,786
23,926
25,122
26,378
27,697
29,082
30,536
pill
23,356
24,524
25,750
27,037
28,389
29,809
31,299
XIX
23,940
25,137
26,394
27,713
29,099
30,554
32,082
XX
24,538
25,765
27,053
28,406
29,826
31,318
32,884
XXI
r
25,152
26,409
27,730
29,116
30,572
32,101
33,706
Xxll
;
25,781
27,070
28,423
29,844
31,336
32,903
34,548
xxill
26,425
27,746
29,134
30,590
32,120
33,726
35,412 .
XXIV
Sr. Engrg Tech, Code Enf Off, Engineer
27,086
28,440
29,862
31,355
32,923
34,569
36,297
XxV
-
27,763
29,151
30,608
32,139
33,746
35,433
37,205
XXVI
38,457
29,880
31,374
32,942
34,589
36,319
38,135
XXVII
29,168
30,627
32,158
33,766
35,454
37,227
39,088
XXV111
_ !
29,897
31,392
32,962
34,610
36,341
38,158
40,065
XXIX
30,645
32,177
33,786
35,475
37,249
39,112
41,067
xxx
Public Works Supervisor
31,411
32,982
34,631
36,362
38,180
40,089
42,094
xxxt
Sergeant
32,196
33,806
35,496
37,271
39,135
41,092
43,146
xxxll
33,001
34,651
36,384
38,203
40,113
42,119
44,225
xxxlll
33,826
35,518
37,293
39,158
41,116
43,172
45,330
XXXIV
34,672
36,406
38,226
40,137
42,144
44,251
46,464
xxxv
Pollce Chief, P.W. Director,City Clerk
i
i
35,539
37,316
39,181
41,141
43,198
45,357
47,625
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 6, 1988
TO: Mayor, City Council,Cit 1strator
Cm
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
SUBJECT: ICity Hall Systems Furniture Purchase
During her process of developing an office system
furniture plan many months ago, our Interior Design
Consultant, Suzanne Ilten, met briefly with each of the
clerical employees to determine their needs. Unfortunately,
our employees.had little or no exposure to systems furniture,
and while the result of Suzanne's plan is impressive looking,
it is not, as functional as it could, or should, be for many
employees'. The purpose of this memo is to request Council
authorization to order additional pieces of systems furniture
which will finish Administration clerical areas, engineering
technician and clerical areas and the Police Sergeants' and
clerical areas.
I
INFORMATION
From the Administration and Engineering perspective, we
envisioned that the systems would be furnished with u -shaped
work surfaces, pedestal units attached to the work surfaces,
electrically powered panels for each station and file
cabinets!of a capacity roughly equivalent to what each
employee had at the old facility. Our mental pictures
differed ,,quite a bit from reality. We have reviewed the plan
with Suzanne and the Facility Systems representative and have
asked Suzanne to generate estimated costs for a list of items
which we believe will create far more functional work
stations +and very happy employees.
We do not yet have firm prices, but anticipate that the
cost for necessary Administration items will be approximately
$1,250. The projected cost to Engineering is $720. The
majority !of these costs relate to purchase of work surfaces,
power panels, and the reVlacement (restocking costs) of two -
drawer rolling files, which are of minimal use to us, with 3
drawer pedestal units to be attached to each of the clerical
work surfaces.
The `anticipated Code Enforcement cost is $560. This
will provide for a divider wall between the two exsiting
stations. The original layout of the Code Enforcement office
provided for two distinct stations, similar in appearance to
the engineering tech stations, within the one large office.
Somewhere along the way, the plan was changed and the result
consists of two wall -hung work surfaces with no separation
between stations.
The decision to add an investigator position in the
Police Department occured after the systems furniture vas
ordered. The original systems plan called for four work
stations in the Sergeants' office (three work stations and a
computer station), however the fourth station was removed
from the priority list when we attempted to reduce overall
initial furniture costs. While the cost for installing the
new station is fairly significant, it has become a priority.
The anticipated cost for this work station and minor costs
for completion of several of the other Police Department work
stations is approximately $2,150.
We believe that each of the items proposed to be
purchased is necessary and warranted. The total projected
cost is $4,680. The purchase, if approved, would be made
from Facility Systems, Inc. under the State contract (72%
discount from list prices). Each of the four departments
will finance its cost within its 1988 budget.
RECOMMENDATION
We recommend that Council authorize staff to issue a
purchase order to Facility Systems, Inc. to provide for the
completion of the existing work stations and addition of one
work station in the Police Department.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass
a motion authorizing the issuance of a purchase order to
Facility Systems, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $4,700 for
the purchase of Herman Miller Action Office Encore products.
I -if
I'M
wo.