The URL can be used to link to this page

1988-12-06+W CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PRE -COUNCIL MEETING - 6:45 P.M. SMALL CONFERENCE ROOM 1. City Administrator Evaluation. 2. Adjourn to Regular Meeting. AGENDA DECEMBER 6 1988 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Agenda Adoption. 4. Approval of Minutes of October 18. 5. Consent Calendar: a. Acknowledgement of October Park Minutes. b. Approval of Resolution No. 88-91, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 11," FOR COMMERCIAL STREET LIGHTING. c. Acknowledgement of November Planning Commission Minutes. d. Authorization for Execution of Kensington Private Watermain Agreement. e. Acknowledgement of November Code Enforcement Report. f. Approval of Resolution NO. 88-92, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 85, PROJECT NO. 311. g. Approval of the List of Licenses. h. A p oval of List of Claiiljs. End of Consent Calendar. 6. Introductions. a. Council Resolution Regarding School District 197 Excess Levy Referendum. (Resolution No. 88-93). (Representative Will Be Present). 7. Public Comments. 8. Response to Public Comments. a. Stop Sign Request for Walsh Lane. 9. Bid Award and Public Hearings: a. Kuross Street Vacation Hearing (Silk Avenue). 7:45 (Resolution No. 88-94). b. Case No. 88-42, United Properties, Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, Preliminary Plat, and Variances. .8:00 P.M. (Resolution No. 88- 95). c. Case No. 88-47, U.S. West, Conditional Use Permit, and Wetlands Permit. 8:15 P.M. (Resolution No. 88- 96). 10. Unfinished and New Business. a. Case No. 88-46., Hair, Lot Split. b. Case No. 88-40, Colon, Subdivision. C. Street Light Discussion. (continued from November 15 meeting). d. Appointment of Administrative Assistant. -neu e. Appointment of Citizen's Park Committee. 11. Council Comments. 12. Adjourn.. 19 -D C� C,�) CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO NOVEMBER 28, 1988 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin pq�—City SUBJECT: City Administrator Salary Request Administrator Performance Evaluation and 1989 We have agreed to meet at 6:45 P.M. next Tuesday evening, December 6 for my end of the year performance evaluation and discussion of 1989 salary request. Last week (dated November 21) I sent each of you a form to use for the performance evaluation. Again, please jot down your thoughts on that form and bring it with you for the discussion. 1989 SALARY REQUEST For 1989, I am requesting a salary of $50,500. This is $2,500 or about 5.2% over my 1988 salary of $48,000. The justification is as follows: Although the position of City Administrator is not included in the Council resolution adopting the pay equity plan, the position was analyzed as a part of the background study, and I think it provides a valid guideline for setting the Administrator's salary. When we adopted the plan in 1987, $390 were assigned to each point value. This was upgraded 4% for 1988 to about $406 per point. I expect to recommend a similar 4% cost of living increase for 1989, bringing it to about $422 per point. Top level "overtime exempt" positions were also assigned an additional 5% in recognition of substantial uncompensated overtime. This brings the point value for department head positions to $443. With the City Administrator's position having been determined to have 117 points, an appropriate fully adjusted salary would be $51,830 ($117 times $443). However, other City employees will not be fully adjusted until August 1 of 1989, so I am not requesting to go to the full amount at this time. The request of $50,500 is a little less than halfway between a simple 4% cost of living increase, and the fully adjusted salary discussed above. For Council information, I have attached copies of the pages from the 1988 Stanton report for the position of city Tanager (administrator). As I think you can see, my salary is very equivalent to that being paid in cities of similar size, roughly Stillwater at the upper population end and Orono at the bottom. ACTION REQUIRED Our discussion for Tuesday evening will be an informal one. The purpose will be to: 1. Discuss your evaluation of my performance for 1988. 2. Indicate whether there is a Council concensus for the requested salary for 1989. Council action to adopt my salary would be in the same resolution as that setting other non -organized employees' salaries at the meeting of December 20. KDF:madlr attachment SURVEY JOB TITLE: City Manager (Administrator); County Administrator JOB NO. 174 Previously Job No. 67 Skill Level - Top administrator in municipality, county or related government unit. Examples of Duties - Carries out the policies established by the Board, Council or Commission for the efficient administration of the county's or municipality's business. Duties include coordinating the administration of all county or municipal departments, developing the annual budget, preparing for and attending board or council meetings, providing information to the public concerning government business, supervising the maintenance of records and making recommendations for the improvement of efficient administration of the affairs of the governmental unit. Minimum Qualifications - Requires managerial, administrative and educational experience necessary for the management of a governmental unit. All rates quoted annually # - Multiple range ::t:�***��+�:f+i�►»•sty♦+��re:ti �* »iii*:�»»♦�i+t►•�**:a:•�**•�*�:f+*��*�•s►•:•moi•:��*:f+:»:off �i s*�f:it••t+f*�*�*mss» •t•��ff �• RATE RANGE LONGEVITY SALARY EXCLUDING LONGEVITY IF APPLICABLE FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION O YEARS YRS YRS # OF MEAN EMPL TRANSPORT / OF # OF TO # OF TO JURISDICTION EMPL SALARY 20.0 35.0 50.0 65.0 80.0 DEGREE SUPV ALLOWANCE T EXP TITLE MIF MAX STEPS MAX MAX STEPS MAX sf*:t*��*»rr•*»•��♦*�*••■ss♦s��t*�:�*i�3f•�y»yatf:*•��i��•s:ss+i:�*** »�**�*pie:s »•��f�*�♦yea*�*�:a**�y�+��t�*•��tfi�*•�f� AIRPORTS COM 1 73.2 _ 1 M.A. 348 24 -HR CAR N 0 - 5 DIR 67.5 80.3 6 5 METRO COUNCIL 1 67.3 1 Ph.D. 213 NONE N 0 - 5 DIR 56.2 73.4 WASTE CNTRL COM 1 72.4 1 B.S. 1000 225/MO N 11-15 ADM GROUP STATISTICS: 71.0 Q1: 67.3 Q2: 72.4 Q3: 73.2 HENNEPIN COUNTY 1 86.8 1 B.S. 5868 150/MO N 11-15 ADM 85.8 86.8 11 15 RAMSEY COUNTY 1 76.9 1 B.A. 2800 150/MO N DIR MINNEAPOLIS 1 73.3 1 B.A. 500 24 -HR CAR N 15+ COORD GROUP STATISTICS: 79.0 Q1: 73.3 Q2: 76.9 Q3: 86.8 DAKOTA COUNTY 1 69.0 1 H.P.A. 948 .24/MILE N 0 - 5 ADH 52.5 83.1 ANOKA COUNTY 1 73.3 1 M.P.A. 1200 24 -HR CAR N 6-10 ADM 56.6 89.7 WASHINGTON CTY 1 76.5 1 B.S. 18 .23/MILE N 0 - 5 ADM 59.3 91.3 12 SCOTT COUNTY 1988 Adjustment Pending NONE 519 300/M0 N 15+ ADM 43.0 57.8 13 CARVER COUNTY 1 52.9 1 M.A. 210 NONE N 0 - 5 ADM 37.9 58.3 8 8 GROUP STATISTICS: 67.9 Q1: 56.9' Q2: 71.2 Q3: 75.7 RICHFIELD 1 67.4 1 BLOOMINGTON 1 77.5 1 LL. B. 462 250/MO N 15+ MGR BROOKLYN PARK 1 70.5 1 M.A. 200 24 -HR CAR N 11-15 MGR EDINA 1 75.4 1 M.A. 213 24 -HR CAR N 11-15 MGR 75.4 COON RAPIDS 1 60.0 1 M.A. 199 25O/M0 N 6-10 MGR ST LOUIS PARK 1 72.1 1 M.P.A. 230 24 -HR CAR N 6-10 MGR 54.9 79.4 MINNETONKA 1 69.6 1 Ph.D. 193 24 -HR CAR N 11-15 MGR BURNSVILLE 1 64.4 1 M.P.A. 220 200/MO N 0 - 5 MGR PLY24OUTH 1 75.7 1 M.A. 205 24 -HR CAR N 15+ MGR 58.1 87.2 RICHFIELD 1 67.4 1 M.P.A. 210 24-EIR CAR N 6-10 MGR at i i Ah Am i i i i M Ah i AD i i ! i i i i i i i i i i Ab i- City Manager (Administrator); County Administrator (cant.) JOB NO. 174 +:ra►:++rr+►xwart:r+r+xrwwxr+rrr ar+rrr:ww•aw+rwr++►a►+r+w♦rrwx+r:rrrrsa::r:rrr r:rrwrrww::•wrrw:r:wwwwrrwwwrwr++xw+rw+rwr+wrrwwrwrarw SALARY FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION BATE RANGE EXCLUDING LONGEVITY LONGEVITY IT APPLICABLE 0 YEARS YRS YRS # OF MEAN EMPL TRANSPORT / OF # OF TO # OF TO JURISDICTION EMPL SALARY 20.0 35.0 50.0 65.0 80.0 DEGREE SUPV ALLOWANCE T EXP TITLE MIN MAX STEPS MAIC MAX STEPS MAX +•wr•wxxrxrwrw+r>x►.••rwxrw>rs+:ewrxx wrwxx++►+xxrrrr:ww:w►: ra>ear►rwx+x+rr++xrxrr rxrrxr:+rrrar+wrrwrawrw r+rxrx:++wrra: »:rr wrrrrrxww EAGAN 1 67.4 1 M.P.A. 142 410/MO N 15+ ADM ROSEVILLE 1988 Adjustment Pending M.P.A. 120 250/MO N 15+ MGR 55.4 80.3 MAPLE GROVE 1 58.3 1 M.P.A. 116 N 11-15 ADM BROOKLYN CENTER 1 69.4 1 M.A. 300 24 -HR CAR N 15+ MGR 58.2 78.8 7 FRIDLEY 1 65.5 1 M.A. 140 2758/YR N 11-15 MGR 64.4 88.6 MAPLEWOOD 1988 Adjustment Pending M.P.A. 143 250/MO N 11-15 MGR APPLE VALLEY 1 55.0 1 M.P.A. 9 350/MO N 0- 5 ADH 55.0 67.0 4 4 EDEN PRAIRIE 1 62.5 1 B.S. 185 24 -HR CAR. N 6-10 CITY 54.8 81.3 CRYSTAL 1 61.5 1 NONE 100 24 -HR CAR N 15+ MGR NEW BRIGHTON 1 55.8 1 M.F.A. 70 350/MO N 11-15 MGR WHITE BEAR LAKE 1988 Adjustment Pending M.P.A. 150 295/MO N 0 - 5 MGR NEW HOPE 1 63.1 1 M.P.A. 71 24 -HR CAR N 6-10 MGR SHOREVIEW 1 55.9 1 M.P.A. 46 .21/MILE N 6-10 MGR 53.2 58.7 3 2 GOLDEN VALLEY 1988 Adjustment Pending M.A. 150 325/MO N 6-10 MGR $0. ST. PAUL 1 50.0 1 M.P.A. 110 1800/YR N ADM INVER GROVE HGT 1 58.0 1 M.P.A. 76 300/MO N 25+ ADM 52.7 58.0 3 1 COLUMBIA HGHTS 1 59.5 1 M.P.A. 124 125/MO N 6-10 MGR 59.5 WEST ST. PAUL 1988 Adjustment Pending M.P.A. 92 N 15+ CITY 54.3 ANOKA 1 45.0 1 M.P.A. 188 300/MO N 0 - 5 MGR 57.2 82.3 HOPKINS 1 58.0 1 M.A. 94 N/A N 6-10 MGR 46.3 69.5 WOODBURY 1 54.6 1 M.A. 65 24 -HR CAR N 0 - 5 ADM 46.1 67.0 3 ROBBINSDALE 1988 Adjustment Pending M.A. 75 3600/YR N 6-10 MGR 59.4 78.2 HASTINGS 1988 Adjustment Pending B.S. 67 .225/MILE N 6-10 ADM STILLWATER 1 48.9 1 B.S. 7 .25/MILE N 6-10 COoRD MOUNDS VIEW 1 49.7 1 M.P.A. 166 I50/MO N 15+ ADM 44.8 54.7 NORTH ST. PAUL 1 58.0 1 M.A. 53 2400 N 6-10 MGR CHAMPLIN 1 45.0 1 B.S. 80 NONE N 6-I0 ADM 41.4 56.1 RAMSEY 1988 Adjustment Pending B.A. 29 .20/MILE N 6-10 ADM SHAKOPEE 1 53.6 1 M.P.A. 60 24 -HR CAR N 11-15 ADM 40.2 53.6 6 5 GROUP STATISTICS. 60.9 Q1: 54.9 Q2: 59.8 031 67.9 MOUND 1 49.0 1 M.A. 80 N/A N 6-10 MGR PRIOR LAKE 1988 Adjustment Pending M.A. 38 250 N 0 - 5 MGR 9.0% 4 16 CHASKA 1 48.1 1 M.P.A. 52 1800/YR N 11-15 ADM 42.0 48.3 ARDEN HILLS 1 37.9 1 B.A. 4 .20/MILE N 0- 5 ADM HAM LAKE 1 37.0 1 NONE 5 CAR AVAIL N 0 - 5 ADM MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1 48.0 1 M.P.A. 35 175/MO N 0 - 5 ADM CHANHASSEN 1988 Adjustment Pending M.P.A. 40 175/MO N 11-15 MGR 41.7 56.4 ORONO 1 50.1 1 M.A. 39 250/MO N 0 - 5 ADM SPRING LAKE PK 1 44.6 1 NONE 58 .20/MILE N 15+ CLERK ROSEMOUNT 1 45.1 1 B.A. 35 24 -HR CAR N 0 - 5 ADM 40.0 55.0 56.6 3 SS SAVAGE 1 41.2 1 M.A. 56 250/MO N 0 - 5 ADM 32.2 42.9 4 3 LAKE £LMO 1 32.5 1 M.A. 8 100/MO N 0- 5 ADM 28.0 32.5 3 4 FALCON HEIGHTS 1 36.4 1 M_P.A. 7 150/MO 9 0- 5 ADM Page No. 2405 October 18, 1988 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, October 18, 1988 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins, Hartmann and Witt. AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of the revised agenda for the meeting. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the minutes of the September 20th meeting with correction._ Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the consent agenda along with authorization for execution of any necessary items contained therein. a. Approval of partial payment no. 11 to Joseph Construction, for $79,741.81, for City Hall construction. b. Approval of partial payment no. 9, for $14,308.90, to Doody Mechanical for City Hall construction. c. Approval of a partial payment of $15,960 to Thomas Electric for City Hall construction. d. Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's a monthly report for September. e. Acknowledgment of a letter of resignation from Miles Bredvold as the City's representative on the Gun Club Page No. 2406 October 18, 1988 g Lake WMO and appointment of Klayton#,' Eckles as his replacement. f. Adoption of Resolution No. 88-81, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 13," in the amount of $2,050.71 to Orfei Contracting, Inc. for work completed on the Stratford Woods Addition. g. Adoption of Resolution No. 88-82, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 5 AND IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO. 1," in the amount of $3,843.06, to Orfei Contacting, Inc., for work completed on Valley Curve Estates and Spring Creek Acres. h. Adoption of Resolution No. 88-83, "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR VAL'S ADDITION." i. Adoption of Resolution No. 88-83, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWERS, WATER, STORM SEWERS AND STREET CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE VAL'S ADDITION AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. 4)." j. Approval of the expenditure of tax increment funding to support the $612.73 street lighting assessment against Parcel No. 27-03400-011-75, owned by Mn/DOT, and direction to staff to work with Mn/DOT on returning the site to the tax rolls. k. Adoption of Ordinance No. 258, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1113," to include stop streets in the Copperfield area. 1. Approval of a wetlands variance for 1892 South Lane to allow construction of a home on Lot 8, Block 1, "The Ponds of Mendota Heights" within 100 feet of the wetlands area. m. Awarding the service of moving City offices to LaBelle Movers of Page No: 2407 October 18, 1988 Minneapolis with a price range of $1,748 to $1,948. n. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated October 18, 1988 and attached hereto. o. Approval of the list of claims dated October 18, 1988 and totalling $372,383.75. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor Mertensotto asked Sun Newspaper reporter Peter Anderson to correct his recent article on the Council's discussion over negotiations with the Rogers Road property owners. Mr. Peter Solberg, 1062 Chippewa Avenue, asked for Council clarification on the Sun Newspapers article relating to the impact of the 1989 budget on residential properties in the City. Administrator Frazell responded that the City tax will increase from 2 to 5% depending on the values of the properties. BIKE TRAIL Council acknowledged letters from Mr. & Mrs. Henry Pabst, 980 Wagon Wheel Trail, and letters from five other families on Wagon Wheel and Rogers Court, requesting the installation of a bike/pedestrian trail along Wagon Wheel. The Council indicated that they would be supportive of the trail construction request and directed that staff prepare a background report for the November 1st agenda. Council also directed that copies of the report be sent to each of the property owners who requested the trail. CURLEY PROPERTY Mr. Lee Maxfield, of Maxfield Research Group, was present to review his study of the proposed Lexington/T.H. 110 shopping center. He informed the audience that his firm had been commissioned by the Council to evaluate the type of tenants that would be appropriate for location, the Curley and SOS properties and the undeveloped land behind the gas station, which is proposed Page No. 2408 October 18, 1988 to develop as a 30,000 to 50,000 square" foot convenience center. Mr. Maxfield reviewed the study conclusions for Council. He felt that the location is very appropriate for the proposed use given its high visibility and traffic volume and because traffic can easily get into and out of the site without driving through residential neighborhoods. He went on to describe retail trends and indicated that virtually every center in his inventory was anchored by a convenience store or convenience store with gas pumps. He felt that without a convenience store with gas pumps the proposed center would not have a draw. Mr. Maxfield described the prototype (located on Highway 36 in Stillwater), of the Super America proposed for the center. Councilmember Blesener expressed concern over whether the types of tenants she has heard talked about for locating in the center will have the,,,interaction Mr. Maxfield has indicated is necessary to make the center work. -Mr. Maxfield responded that it will be necessary to attract traffic on a regular basis, the furniture store has been at its present location for years and has established trade, and that the uses suggested by the developers are all strong uses (take-out foods, restaurant, etc.). Councilmember Cummins asked Mr. Maxfield for his opinion on what kind of total local population would be necessary to support this type of center. Mr. Maxfield stated that he believes there should be a base of 5,000 people, 3,000 households. Councilmember Cummins guessed that the .population in the area would be about 1,500 with no substantial number of units projected for the future. He wondered whether, with the Mendota Plaza only a mile away, there realistically is a population base to support the proposed center. Mr. Maxfield responded that one must consider traffic counts and who is using T.H. 110 and pointed out that the industrial area is also in close proximity to the site. He stated that the developer has done a traffic analysis and that the counts at Lexington and T.H. 110 are more Page No. 2409 October 18, 1988 than one would generally see for this type of facility. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that if this were a privately financed development he thinks Council would be less reluctant, but that the developer is asking the City to provide tax increment financing of approximately $300,000 to $400,000. He stated that the center must generate $85,000 to $90,000 more tax revenue than what the property generates now in order to pay off the tax increment bonds that would be necessary. Mayor Mertensotto stated that Council is concerned over whether the type of facility proposed has the capability of generating the tax difference. Mr. Maxfield stated that he was surprised that so much, nearly half, of the space in the proposed center is committed, and that he type of uses committed plus the other logical uses would create a viable center. He felt that the center would be successful and that it would be an expensive enough facility to generate the necessary taxes. Responding to a question from Councilmember Blesener, he stated that a free-standing convenience store on the corner of the site would create more exposure for other stores in the center and would provide for traffic which would not conflict with traffic going into the center. Councilmember Blesener asked how the City could protect its interests in terms of selection of tenants, and what might be expected in terms of stability and turn over in tenancy. Mr. Maxfield responded that much depends on the screening of the tenants (how long the business has been in existence, bank references, etc.), and suggested that in the worst case scenario,there would still be a shopping center that could be re- leased if there was a default. Responding to a question from Councilmember Cummins, Mr. Maxfield stated that he has not reviewed the proposed financing for the project. Page No. 2410 October 18, 1988 Councilmember Blesener expressed concern over the potential impact of a convenience store/gas station on the corner, in particular in terms of aesthetics. Mr. Maxfield stated that without a convenience/gas facility, the center might work, but with the convenience/gas facility other tenants will readily want to be in the center because of the draw of the convenience facility. Representatives of Croix Oil Company present for the discussion showed Council pictures and models of a Super America facility which would be proposed for the site and answered questions. Administrator Frazell pointed out that the developers have not yet submitted planning applications and that application submission and hearings on a rezoning to B- 4 must occur before consideration of the convenience/gas station matter. It was the consensus that a joint Council/Planning Commission meeting should be held to discuss the matter and that Treasurer Shaughnessy should prepare a report on finance issues. CORNICK WATERMAIN Council acknowledged a report from the Public Works Director regarding HUD approval of the use of community development block grant assistance for the proposed watermain extension to the Cornick residence, 1176 Sibley Memorial Highway. Councilmember Witt informed Council that she has met with County HRA representatives and they are in the process of preparing an amendment to the City's CDBG program. She stated that the City had a substantial amount of money left in its CDBG account and felt that this project seems appropriate for CDBG funding. Councilmember Cummins asked whether the City would be jeopardizing its future eligibility for CDBG funds if it failed to use the money available in its account for the past two years. Councilmember Witt stated that it would not. Page No. 2411 October 18, 1988 Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolution No. 88-85, "RESOLUTION REQUESTING THAT THE DAKOTA COUNTY BOARD AMEND THE CITY'S CDBG PROGRAM." Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolution No. 88-86, "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR WATERMAIN EXTENSION TO SERVE 1132, 1140, 1150, 1160, 1176 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY AND ONE VACANT LOT ON SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO. 6).11 Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 RECYCLING Administrator Frazell reviewed his report regarding preparation of a recycling grant application and requesting authorization to submit the application for grant monies to Dakota County. Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolution No. 88-87, "RESOLUTION SEEKING FUNDING FROM DAKOTA COUNTY FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A SOLID WASTE RECYCLING PROGRAM." Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PERSONNEL Council acknowledged a memo from Police Chief Delmont regarding the hiring process for a new police officer, and requesting authority to participate in the Minnesota Police Recruitment System. Mayor Mertensotto felt that'the past hiring procedure has been very effective and should be continued. Councilmember Cummins felt that it makes a good deal of sense to utilize the recruitment system proposed, that the cost is reasonable and will save the time and effort involved in processing the large number of applications that would be received if the City advertised the position. After brief discussion, Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No. Page No. 2412 October 18, 1988 88-88, "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE MINNESOTA POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM," for screening candidates for the 1989 police officer position, along with authorization for execution of the associated Joint and Cooperative Agreement. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 AMM POLICIES Councilmember Blesener informed Council that, as the Council's Association of Metropolitan Municipalities representative, she would attend the November 3rd AMM meeting on legislative policy adoption. CITY HALL Gene Lange was present to inform Council on the status of City Hall construction and to discuss the need for sod and blinds. He showed Council a drawing of proposed areas to be sodded and felt that sodding of the slope areas is critical. Mayor Mertensotto asked whether there would be any guarantee against the,sod dying because it is so late in the season. He also indicated that he does not agree that sod should be installed. Responding to a question from Councilmember Cummins regarding using seed in burlap rather than sod, Mr. Lange stated that this alternative would be more expensive. He informed Council that he does not know if the sod would be guaranteed, and stated that the cost for sodding would be $1.24 per yard, or a total of $4,000. He also indicated that erosion is the primary reason for recommending sod. Councilmember Cummins moved to authorize an expenditure of up to $4,000 for sodding, providing that the sod is guaranteed. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Mr. Lange informed Council that he believes window blinds are necessary for the south and west sides on the upper level of City Hall and in the Council Chambers. He informed Council that he has received a bid of $2,730.25 for the office blinds, and Page No. 2413 October 18, 1988 estimated that Council Chamber blinds would cost about $300. It was the consensus that vertical blinds should be used in the Council Chambers and that staff should work with the interior design consultant on this matter. Councilmember Witt moved to approve the purchase of mini -blinds for the south and west upper level City Hall windows from Window Warehouse for $2,730.25. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MISCELLANEOUS Council reviewed proposed new City stationery. Council acknowledged a letter from Mr. Jerome Schouveller declining to sell his home on Rogers Road at the appraised price and indicating a desire to sell his two vacant lots at the Davis and Lagerman appraised value of $40,000. Council indicated that it is not interested in acquiring vacant land. Councilmember Witt stated that it appears that Harry Kirchner is parking cars on the Perkegwin property and asked staff to look into the matter. Councilmember Witt gave Council an update on the park subcommittee discussions. She suggested that a committee of representa- tives from the Council, Planning and Park Commissions and citizens to prepare for a referendum. It was the consensus that Council suggest names to the City Administrator for development of a committee list for future Council consideration. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmember Cummins moved to adjourn to the October 20th meeting with the Fire Department. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor • Page No. 2414 October 18, 1988 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:05 o'clock P.M. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1988 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Jim Stein. Members present included Stein, Katz, Lachenmayer, Damberg and Huber. Absent were Leffert and Owens. Also present were City Administrator Kevin Frazell, Councilmember Janet Blesener, developers Howard Bream and Ted Zinner. 1. John Huber was elected secretary. 2. Agreed to delay until Spring, 1989, a landscaping plan for the existing parks. Damberg stressed need to assess drought damage, survey condition of trees, and prepare trees and landscaping for winter. =f 3. Mendakota Park - attempts made to fit ballpark into the site. Mr. Zinner of C.G. Rein Company, opposes a ball field due to demographics of persons in the development. Request Barton-Aschman to include a plan for review that includes a ball field for next park meeting. 4. Victoria Highlands Park - idea•to acquire additional lots dropped due to cost. Plan was presented for park to include: Two face-to-face t -ball fields. Parking for 6-8 cars. One hard court. One play structure. Plan was generally agreed to. 5. Parks Budget - City Administrator Frazell presented the parks budget. 6. Oak Wilt - Katz raised the issue of oak wilt and that a citizens group is being formed to address the issue. 7. Adjourn - the meeting adjourned at 9:27 P.M. Respectfully submitted, John Huber CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 21, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City A i�9sr'�or FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Commercial Street Lighting Job No. 862. Improvement No. 86, Project No. 11 Collins Electric Construction Company has satisfactorily completed the above project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Council accept the project and authorize f inal payment. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with the recommendation, Council should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 88- , RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND AP- PROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 11. City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 11 WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Mendota Heights on December 5, , Collins Electric Construction Company of St. Paul, Minnesota, has satisfactorily completed the improvement commercial district street lighting to serve the area knownas Mendota Heights Indus- trial/Business Park, Carew Business Center, Inland Industrial Park, Medallion Industrial Park and Yorkton Centre Pointe South (Improvement No. 86,, Project No. 11) in accordance with such contract. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the work completed under said contract is hereby ac- cepted and approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby dir- ected to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract in the amount of $3,05.88, taking the contractor's receipt in full. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 6th day of December, 1988. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By, Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk Page 1 November 22, 1988 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planningi Commission was held on Tuesday, November 22, 1988, n the new City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve. Chairman Morson called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. The following members were present: Morson, Anderson, Burke, Duggan, Dwyer, Krebsbach, and McMonigal. Also present were Planner Howard Dahlgren and Public Works Director Jim Danielson. APPROVAL OF . Commissioner McMonigal moved approval of MINUTES the October 25 minutes as submitted. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 88-46, Mr. Doug Hair, owner of Lot 18, Linden HAIR, LOT SPLIT Addition, proposes to transfer the east 35 feet of his property to Mr. Paul Maczko, owner of Lot 19, Linden Addition. Mr. Maczko was present to explain that he would like this property for a future garage expansion. Commissioner Anderson moved to recommend waiving the public hearing requirement and to grant approval of the 35 foot lot -split as proposed for Lot 18, Linden Addition. Commissioner Dwyer seconded the motion. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 PARKS STUDY Commissioners Sandra Krebsbach and Mike COMMITTEE Dwyer volunteered to serve as the Planning APPOINTMENTS Commission representatives for the Parks Study Committee. CASE NO. 88-42, Chairman Morson called the meeting to order UNITED PROPERTIES for the purpose of a public hearing to CUP/PUD, PRELIM- consider a request from United Properties INARY PLAT, for a conditional use permit for a planned VARIANCES. unit development, preliminary plat and HEARING variance to allow construction of South - ridge Business Center Phases II and III. Mr. Dale Glowa was present to explain the proposal. Mr. Glowa noted that Phase II will be a mirror image of Phase I, with the same brick, glass, etc., and will be 50% office and 50% warehouse space. The tenant sign Page 2 November 22, 1988 will be on the building in front of the tenant suites and United's request is no different from what they requested for Phase I. Commissioner Burke asked if it would be possible to save any of the pine trees on the property. Mr. Glowa said he would look into the possibility of transplanting them. He also noted that ground breaking will hopefully be accomplished by December 31, 1988. Chairman Morson asked for questions from the audience. There being no questions, Commissioner Duggan moved to close the public hearing at 8:04 o'clock P.M. Commissioner McMonigal seconded the motion. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend approval of the following variances requested for Southridge Business Center 2nd Addition: 1. a 20 foot sign setback. 2. four cars per 1000 square feet of parking area. 3. an 816" parking stall width, as previously established with Phase I. In addition, as many trees as possible should be saved or transplanted. Chairman Morson offered a friendly amendment to include approval of the conditional use permit for a planned unit development and the preliminary plat as shown on the drawing dated October 27, 1988. Commissioner Burke seconded the motion, including the amendment. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 88-40, Chairman Morson called the meeting to order COLON, SUB- for the purpose of a continued Public DIVISION, hearing on Mr. Colon's application for the HEARING subdivision of his property on TH 13. Mr. Page 3 November 22, 1988 Colon was present and noted that there were no changes in his plans since the October hearing, and that Public Works Director Danielson had covered all the necessary items in his staff report. Commissioner Anderson reiterated his concern with access to the site off TH 13. He felt this access was a very unsafe situation with site distance on TH 13 to the north, and again asked Mr. Colon if he would consider reversing his cul-de-sac in the plat. Mr. Colon said he would not consider this reversal. Commissioner Krebsbach stated she would like to see a walking easement between Lots 4 and 5 which would allow children to get into the area of Hiawatha and Miriam without having to use TH 13. Public Works Director Danielson indicated that the storm sewer will be connected on Miriam and that there could be a possibility of a walking path over the utility easement. Chairman Morson asked for questions or comments from the audience. Mr. Tom Sullivan, 641 Highway 13, noted that it is dangerous to walk or ride a bike on TH 13, since it is so narrow and he stated that you have to be really sharp to pull out onto TH 13. Mrs. Nancy Kane, 586 Highway 13 stated she has lived there for 30 years and she agreed with Commissioner Anderson that the traffic is awful and school buses pick up the children on TH 13 and it is very dangerous. Mrs. Victoria Neish, 572 Hiawatha said if someone has a problem with the traffic on TH 13, don't buy a lot there. She suggested that planning for problems should be done ahead of time. Mr. Wayne Schwanz, 591 Hiawatha, noted that he circulated the petitions against the connection of Miriam and Hiawatha. He stated that 21 of 22 persons signed the petition against Hiawatha connecting to TH 13 and 13 of 14 residents signed against Page 4 November 22, 1988 Miriam being connected to TH 13. He stated he feels Simard will be affected by the storm water drainage also. A gentlemen said he felt TH 13 should be widened in this area, which would solve many problems. He also said he would favor a bike/walking path along with the widening of the highway. Public Works Director Danielson indicated he had heard no talk of improvements to this stretch of Highway 13. Planner Dahlgren noted that the plan is to ultimately have a walkway all along TH 13. This is the State's long-range plan and when the Happy Hollow bridge was reconstructed, it was constructed wider than the original to accommodate the walkway. Mr. John Zoliak, 555 Hiawatha, stated he felt there was good site lines on TH 13 to Garden Lane and he wanted to hear the opinions of the other commissioners before he spoke on the proposal. It was pointed out that there was no history of accidents in this area of TH 13. Mr. William Neish, 572 Hiawatha, stated that the speed limit should only be 30 miles per hour here. Public Works Director Danielson stated that the State regulates the speed limit, the City has no control over it. Mr. Colon stated that he will accept the Commission's decision either with or without the Miriam/Hiawatha connection in the plan. Commissioner Duggan asked him why he wouldn't consider reversing the cul-de-sac in the plat. Public Works Director Danielson stated that staff prefers to have Miriam connect with Hiawatha and noted that the existing traffic pattern will not change if it is or is not connected. Mr. Colon indicated that he would have a m Page 5 November 22, 1988 problem with a walkway being placed between Lots 4 and 5, but if the residents of the area wanted it, it would be ok, otherwise it would not be ok with him. It was noted that the minimum size of the easement/walking path would be 10 feet in width and could be part of the subdivision. Mr. Neish thought a three way stop sign on TH 13 would help. Commissioner Krebsbach expressed her concern with guest parking on the cul-de- sac. She felt there would not be adequate parking space. There being no further questions or comments, Commissioner Duggan moved to close the public hearing at 9:25 P.M. Commissioner Burke seconded the motion Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 Mr. William Trueter, 564 Hiawatha, asked where the sewer will hook up. Public Works Director Danielson stated it will hook up to the main in TH 13. Commissioner Anderson moved to recommend denial of the subdivision as proposed because he felt the cul-de-sac is facing the wrong direction, and that it should access through Miriam, not TH 13. There being no second to the motion, the motion failed. Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend approval of the subdivision as proposed with the Miriam/Hiawatha connection, and an easement for walking/biking/utilities be provided between Lots 4 and 5 through the adjoining area. Commissioner Burke seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 3, Anderson, McMonigal and Dwyer The motion passed on a 4-3 vote. RECESS The Commission called for a recess at 9:35 and the meeting reconvened at 9:40 P.M. Page 6 November 22, 1988 CASE NO. 88-47, Chairman Morson called the meeting to NW BELL, CUP & order for the purpose of a public hearing WETLANDS to consider a request from Northwestern PERMIT Bell Telephone Company for a conditional use permit and wetlands permit to install a telephone equipment building on Outlot B, Kensington development. Mr. Ken Dahlman, from NW Bell was present to explain the request. He noted that the building would be 18' by 32' and would be located on Mendota Heights Road. It will be a trial project for fiber optics transmissions and will serve about 100 units. It could eventually serve the Mary Anderson, Copperfield, Hampshire Estates, and Friendly Hills developments. There will be no noise generated from the site and NW Bell will maintain the building and land by contract. The system could eventually handle up to 6000 homes. Mr. Kevin Clark, with Centex Homes, was present and noted that the building will architecturally blend in with the manor homes proposed, as will the landscaping. Commissioner Krebsbach felt this building will have a negative impact for the area and it should not be placed in a residential area. Chairman Morson asked for questions from the audience. There being none, the public hearing was closed at 9:58 P.M. Commissioner Dwyer moved to recommend approval of a conditional use permit and wetlands permit as requested to allow construction of the telephone equipment building within 26 feet of a wetlands on Outlot B, Kensington PUD. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 VERBAL REVIEW Public Works Director Danielson gave a verbal review of cases that had been before the City Council. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Commission, Commissioner Duggan moved that the meeting be Mt Page 7 November 22, 1988 a adjourned to the joint City Council/ Planning Commission workshop on Tuesday, November 29, to discuss the redevelopment of the Lexington/TH110 area. Commissioner Dwyer seconded the motion. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:02 P.M. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 14, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City�i=qt)or FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Kensington Private Watermain Agreement DISCUSSION: St. Paul Water Utility is requiring that both Kensington and Victoria Highlands Planned Unit Developments have private watermains within their private roadway areas. Centex has completed the Kensington agreement to comply with St. Paul's requirement (see attached). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends signing the agreement. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should pass a motion authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. 4 AGREEMENT THIS INDENTURE, Made this day of , 1988, by and between Centex Real Estate Corporation, a Nevada Corporation, hereinafter designated as "Owner", the City of Mendota Heights, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, hereinafter designated as "Mendota Heights", and the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, hereinafter designated as "Board". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, The Owner owns the following described land situated within the corporate limits of Mendota Heights in the County of Dakota and State of Minnesota: Lots 1 through 3, Block 1, Lots 1 through 11, Block 2, Lots 1 through 6, Block 3, Outlots B,C,D and E, Kensington P.U.D., Dakota County, Minnesota and have petitioned Mendota Heights for water main extensions to be afforded from Mendota Heights' public water supply system to the above described premises and have made application to the Board for water supply service from said water main extensions according to the rates and charges payable therefor by the Owner, their successors or assigns, to such municipality or the Board, as the same may be established from time to time; and WHEREAS, The Board during all times herein mentioned did and does manage, control and operate, pursuant•to the Home Rule Charter of the City of Saint Paul, its water works and public water supply system primarily for the purpose of furnishing an adequate supply of water for industrial, commercial and domestic purposes to residents of the City of Saint Paul within its corporate limits, and incidentally to residents of the City of Mendota Heights, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, for the same or similar purposes, pursuant to agreements by and between the Board and said last named City and ordinances of said City of Saint Paul and City of Mendota Heights, germane thereto; and WHEREAS, Said Mendota Heights and the Board have made subsisting agreements, by and between them, germane to the extension of water service, for the aforesaid purposes, from said public water supply system owned by the City of Saint Paul and operated by the Board, to Mendota Heights and the residents of the same within its corporate limits, and such extension of water supply service has been and now is the subject of city ordinances germane thereto duly enacted by Mendota Heights and said City of Saint Paul, this agreement to be deemed subject to said prior subsisting agreements and said ordinances. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties, for themselves, their successors or assigns, do hereby mutually agree as follows: 1. The Owner does hereby convey and grant to Mendota Heights and the Board perpetual water main easements, in, under, through and over and across lands identified in the recorded plat of Kensington P.U.D. as "Drainage & Utility Easement". 2. Mendota Heights and the Board hereby grant permission to the Owner to const J ruct, maintain, utilize and repair private water mains necessary for the furnishing of water service to the following described real property subject to the terms and conditions contained herein: Lots 1 through 3, Block 1, Lots I through 11, Block 2, Lots I through 6, Block 3, Outlots B,C,D and E, Kensington P.U.D., Dakota County, Minnesota - 2 - 3. The Owner shall construct the private water mains at their sole cost and expense, in strict accordance with approved plans and specifications on file with Mendota Heights and the Board, under the supervision and to the approval of Mendota Heights and the Board and within the easements described in Section 1. All service connections from the private mains shall be constructed by the Owner at its sole cost and expense, in strict accord with plans and specifications approved and on file with Mendota heights and the Board and under the supervision and approval of Mendota Heights and the Board. 4. All necessary maintenance, repairs, operation and/or replacement of the mains and service connections shall be borne by the Owner at its sole cost and expense in strict accord with plans and specifications approved and on file with Mendota Iieights and the Board and subject to approval by Mendota Heights and the Board. 5. Mendota heights and the Board, at the request of the Owner, or in case of default by the Owner in relation to the construction, reconstruction, maintenance, repair or operation of said private mains may enter upon said easements as described in Section 1 and construct, reconstruct, maintain, repair or operate said private mains for the aforesaid purposes of the same and all reasonable cost and expense thus incurred by the Board shall be chargeable by the Board to the Owner and shall become due and payable upon representation of a proper invoice therefor; and if such charges are not paid when due, they shall become and constitute a lien upon the real property served. In the event of nonpayment, the Board reserves the right to deny service. 6. The Board agrees to supply water service to the real property described in Section 2 as the same has been or shall be developed for ' residential purposes, subject to and in accordance with applicable rates or -- 3 - charges, rules and regulations as they are or shall be established from time to time by the Board. It is understood and agreed, however, that the Board undertakes to supply such water supply only in case the pressure in the mains is sufficient to enable it so to do, and the Board assumes no responsibility for failure to supply water resulting from acts or conditions beyond its control. 7. It is agreed by and between the parties hereto that this agreement shall be subject to water service rates, rules and regulations germane to the subject of this agreement now in force and hereinafter prescribed and promulgated by Mendota Heights or by the Board, and further that there shall be and hereby is reserved to Mendota Heights and to the Board the right to change, revise, alter and amend such rates, rules and regulations as their discretion shall direct to the end that such rates, rules and regulations shall be reasonable. 8. No extension of the private water mains shall be made without the prior written consent of Mendota Heights and the Board. All necessary service connection taps from the private water mains shall be installed by the Board upon due application therefor on a form supplied by the Board and shall be installed by the Board at the cost and expense of the party requesting same. Official address for each service connection shall. be obtained by the Owner from Mendota sleights and furnished to the board prior to the installation of service connection taps. 9. The Board reserves the right to shut off the water service when necessary for the extension, replacement, repair or cleaning of the private water mains or apparatus appurtenant thereto, and the Board shall not be held - 4 - liable for any damage occasioned thereby. Prior to shutting off the water' service as provided above, the Board shall provide the Owner with reasonable notice of the time the water service will be shut off and the estimated length of the curtailment of water service. 10. This agreement shall be binding upon the Owner', its successors and assigns and the obligations and rights granted hereunder shall run with the land. This agreement shall be in form as to be subject to recording with the Dakota County Recorder, the form shall be subject to- approval of Mendota Heights and the Board and Mendota Heights and the Board shall be provided with and executed copy of the agreement. 11. That the Owner, in consideration of their being supplied water by the Board, upon the terms and conditions herein outlined, shall comply strictly with all of the rules and regulations of the Board, and pay or cause to be paid unto the board therefor according to all applicable rates and charges prescribed and promulgated therefor by the Board not in existence oras may be modified or amended, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. The Board reserves the right to shut off the water supply for nonpayment of applicable water charges and it is expressly.agreed that such unpaid water charges and costs incurred by the Board pursuant to this agreement shall be and constitute a lien upon the real estate served pursuant to this agreement. 12. This agreement shall be binding upon the Owner, its successors and assigns and any Association of Landowners within Kensington P.U.D. It is understood and agreed that an Association of Landowners of individual property parcels within Kensington P.U.D. will be formed, and therefore, this agreement O&M and the rights and obligations herein of the Owner shall be binding upon the Association of Landowners of said property parcels, and by becoming an owner of real property within Kensington P.U.D., and without further act or agreement such individual property owner shall be deemed to have agreed to the provisions of this agreement and is to be bound hereby. 13. Except for injuries arising from the negligence of. the Board or Mendota Heights the Owner, its successors and assigns, shall fully indemnify, defend and save harmless Mendota heights and the Board, their officers, agents, employees and servants from all suits, actions, or claims which shall arise from any injuries caused b) any break or leak in a:iy service pipe, main of connection that may occur from the furnishing of a supply of water by the board to the Owner, their tenants, successors and assigns, or other persons, firms or corporations served and to be served by these private water mains and that the Owner; its successors and assigns, except in the case of negligence by the Board or Mendota Heights shall save harmless and defend Mendota Heights and the Board against any claim, action or lawsuit brought against Mendota • Heights or the Board in connection witn or as a result of the furnishing of such water, by Mendota -Heights and the Board, to the Owner, or other persons, firms or corporations served on said premises by such private water mains. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be executed the day and year first written. CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORPORATION Title ?(2-F-5 t DC- A-;� STATE OF tmiviv6so T- ) MARY JANE WEBER SS NOTARY PUBW - MINNESOTA COUNTY OF 110V IVEPI A) ) My ENaomn�N nN�kw a/3o� 14 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1---) WA day of IUAveJ)ghel 1988, by 7—)1011V5 A, Al)[/(le !"�P5/Cleif f of Centex Real Estate Corporation, a Nevada corporation on behalf of the corporation. A14'L'Lj- o""o SignatuV of Yerson taking acknowledgement - 7 - APPROVED: Thomas D. Mogren, Ge ral Manager BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL Roger J. Goswitz, President Verne E. Jacobsen, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) FORM APPROVED: Assi City The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1988, by Roger J. Goswitz, President and Verne E. Jacobsen, Secretary of the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Signature of person taking acknowledgement This instrument was drafted by: Name: Saint Paul Water Utility Address: 25 W. 4th Street. St. Paul, MN COUNTERSIGNED: Eugene A. Schiller, Director, Finance & Management Services City of Saint Paul STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1988 by Eugene A. Schiller, Director of the Department of Finance & Management Services, of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Signature of person taking acknowledgment COUNTERSIGNED: Albert B. Olson, City Clerk, City of Saint Paul STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1988 by Albert B. Olson, City Clerk of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Signature of person taking acknowledgment COUNTERSIGNED: George Latimer, Mayor, City of Saint Paul STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1988 by George Latimer, Mayor of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Signature of person taking acknowledgment - 10 - TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Building Activity Report for November, 1988 MEMO Date November 25, 1988 TRAnF RFRMITS PLUMBING 8 220.00 WATER 23 115.00 SEWER 19 332.50 HEAT, AC, & GAS 20 1,205.00 7TAL 70 1,874.50 LICENSING CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES 16 400.00 TOTAL 113 $4,267,237.00 $29,742.51 166 4,387.00 CURRENT MONTH 4,588.00 153 YEAR TO DATE - 1988 1,015.00 YEAR TO DATE - 1987 BUILDING 2,765.00 204 17,303.00 222 22,966.50 654 24,747.50 756 31,334.50 PERMITS NO. VALUATION FEE COLLECTED NO. VALUATION FEE COLLECTED NO. VALUATION FEE COLLECTED SFD 12 1,769,471.00 15,966.25 128 19,685,775.00 173,064.84 148 21,488,319.80 191,660.07 APT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C/I 4 2,408,764.00 9,769.96 51 7,840,953.00 42,523.88 57 11,369,541.56 60,656.36 MISC. 11 89,002.00 1,731.80 206 1,465,915.00 26,138,98 216 1,477,538.48 26,648.51 SUB TOTAL 27 $4,267,237.00 $27,468.01 385 $28,992,643.00 $241,727.70 421 $34,335,399.84 $278,964.94 TRAnF RFRMITS PLUMBING 8 220.00 WATER 23 115.00 SEWER 19 332.50 HEAT, AC, & GAS 20 1,205.00 7TAL 70 1,874.50 LICENSING CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES 16 400.00 TOTAL 113 $4,267,237.00 $29,742.51 166 4,387.00 173 4,588.00 153 765.00 203 1,015.00 131 2,292.50 158 2,765.00 204 17,303.00 222 22,966.50 654 24,747.50 756 31,334.50 475 11,875.00 466 11,650.00 ,514 $28,992,643.00 $278,350.20 V,643 $34,335,399.84 $321,949.44 NOTE: All fee anus exclude Sac, Wac, and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee, and valuation amounts. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOW December 1, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets Northland Plaza Job No. 8427 Improvement No. 85, Project No. 3 nTqnTTqqTnw - Richard Knutson, Inc. has satisfactorily completed the above project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council accept the project and approve final payment to Richard Knutson, Inc. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with the staff recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 88- , RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 85, PROJECT NO. 3 t RM City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 85, PROJECT NO. 3 WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Mendota Heights on November 20, 1987, Richard Knutson, Inc. of Savage, Minnesota, has satisfactorily completed the improvement of sanitary sewers, watermains, storm sewers and street improvements to serve the area known as the Northland Plaza (Improvement No. 85, Project No. 3) in accordance with such contract. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby dir- ected to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract in the amount of $12,818.41, taking the contractor's receipt in full. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 6th day of December, 1988. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 6, 1988 Concrete Licenses: Dwain Pomerleau Masonry, Inc. Simon Bros. Cement Co. Excavating Licenses: Duane Herman Jesse's Excavating Mega Company Ron Lahti Excavating Gas Piping License: Burnsville Heating & Air Conditioning General Contractor Licenses: B & B Builders C.R. Partridge Homes Condor Corporation Edward Callahan & Sons J.D.N. Builders, Inc. Karlen Construction North Valley Homes, Inc. Roncor Construction, Inc. Heating & Air Conditioning License: Burnsville Heating & Air Conditioning A d Dec 1988 ^k 10:15 AM ernp Check Number 1 Temp. Check _ lumber Vendor Name '.1 Albinson 1 Totals Temp Check Number kDept 10 -Adm Claims List 12/6/8 15-Engr City of Mendota Heights', �� 20-Pol e 30 -Fire 40 -CEO Account Code Comments 01-4305-040-40 wall rack and file 1 'emp Check Number 2 2 American Natl Bank 08-4226-000-00 Pay agent fee 2 American Natl Bank 13-4226-000-00 Pay agent fee 4 Totals Temp Check Number 2 emp Check Number 3 3 Earl F Anderson Assoc 01-4420-050-50 return 3 Earl F Anderson Assoc 01-4420-050-50 signs 6 Totals Temp Check Number 3 ferno Check Number 4 4 AT&T 01-4210-020-20 Dec svc 4 AT&T 01-4210-050-50 Dec svc 4 AT&T 01-4210-070-70 Dec svc 4 AT&T 15-4210-060-60 Dec svc 16 Totals Temp Check Number 4 Cemp Check Number 5 Dept 50 -Rd& Bridge 60 -Utilities Page 1 70 -Parks 80 -Planning 90 -Animal Control Amount „ 335. 87 335.87 258.25 50.00 308.25 122. 75cr 235.60 112.85 3.96 10. 52 10.53 10.53 35.54 5 B&J Auto Supply 01-4305-050-50 oil filters 9.74 !k:;3 B&J_ Auto Supply 01-4330-490-50 ,r parts 11.15 5 H&J Auto Supply 01-4330-490-70 s1.,,partsL�n D. Sm"39.55 L%7ral a 2�twu,s.c is cca� rc c r �' nq ry-mrd ,� F Kj 15 - ---- --_ - ---• 60.44 • Totals;,%Ternp Check ,il t!pbe#bra - 5,c S F.� g r,. Ryj 0 (' Ll' 19 �' r4•'v Q. " FernQ Check -.Number ,^ sv- ,.tr-yu=,6 l Y Zu3i. G r t fi' Ir`) r, U CCU 1.r ti ,.» ...... ,. - �� :'v1u `c�<i..ffC.�T01.': �kjC�W 7tJ �Rlal.... -. - - - ':� ��' In � �• t9r4 �� y� 4n .. a.r :.x =-; �:::: Board; of Waterl Comm�E a rrU;iia• L01�,�4425-315-30 _ - Oct svc _ - ,� �•a :• 87. 52 _ : - ==6 Board `of Water Comm' - `.' 01-4425-110-10 ..< Oct Svc 8.40 - - ^ 9, 6 Board of,,Watew;Comrn:" =..� i,.f,._. 0w ,- 01-4425-020-20 B xc;dsc KID +,�, d :.,-: Oct svc,JD .u- ti' Qakr g B .::yrs Exb 8. 40 6 Board of Water, LComm ,�. $�05-4425-105-15 4 r��_�x� Oct svc ;G4a y 8.41 6 Board of Water Comm ? =+15-4425-310-60 Oct svc " 22.57 ,;.r�r:.a .�s`. t#c�- o!'r7J� .�,'v:' '.a,� _ - = ` -- - -- _s_<r-`-.. ;' '"'"'z`::r..: `.:v-rYi.� s•5 _�..F.:" - _ - ., .. _ - -• _------ _ -. _ _, l b _ :.+A:.: •�� ,- .. f .;:�30 ~ ; •`.- - ,38' _- ..- ��..- - . - v--4*..1ti4.4 _. - _ �;.�... . . ... - .......� ._ - 135. 30 Totals-. empa Check Number - aSr •P3 �•. - �'{3''6ry P, 9 'sTr 3:t�' S'- .rig'.. <}. `. - e, Wil;' -- "-} - .r •1, }- }r^i..•'.r � .4 - F.1A5R �i' �"Y iT cam'• ...M /��1.^I [�• _ - j hyP. 11ti - _'}:-. .R�iT.— =�_'. -Y r., �`•u-�P -< ,r��..$. '�lt FSS �a,�.�,. •-�� - - -ix. ....:ti,`K•• -' -i...,..._ r`F" T.:-.-.. .p . ;Lt - � - _. !=. - w;yu-. `•,.Yi'Yyi' f -.� -. 'S.y^ • a.. ..was= .,$:i-�+i.:-_Z.-..--.._-:.. - _ "'"T-:'Sz . - - ..''^':'.'`r,•'f�a}'-^•" ,..r+,.-sw•t :.r i �..•..:.:r., ti...u...m.as':=+`«•Sa;--..-..:...,� _— s��+.-+nm.ss..vs.�..�r•rs-rz•r.. �>s =.--.�n.:w+rm.ar:_---,..--: _`r .am.,+.%•c-.z:n-3_,rs.-ssmar.-..ear o-a-s+a_ %r=�� , xsaa Claims List page 2 0:15 om City or Mendota Heights Check wmnuer 7 x ' ' _27'00 � e7 mw ^ r Vendor Name �_,-� ' � Account Code Comments � . wmount .C91a o Hocmouf' Check Number 12 7 City Motor Supply :t� � ' - 01 misc parts - 125.*5 7 City motor ounnzy 01 misc parts 17.e8 7 City motor Supply 01-4330-490-70 misc parts 13.85 / 7 city motor ovnnzv 01 -4305 -0e0 -e0 o beams oe'aa 7 City motor Supply' 01-4305-050-50 misc snzys e'40 - ---_-_ ' 5 1ya'aa tazs Temp Check Number r Check Number a a Dahlgren oharuzow uban 01-42e1-135-80 Oct retainer 1,408.00 a Dahlgren sharuzow uuan 01-4220-135-80 Oct rq Re Dwyer . 218'05 _------- - a 1,a2a'mo tals Temp Check Number a ' Check Number s ` y ocn Corp 01-4200-600-10 rent thru 11-15 8e1'00 s ocR Corp 01 -4e00 -600_e0 Rent thru 11-15 ' 464.00 ( y oon Corp 05-+200-600-15 Rent ohru 11-15 852'50 --_--_-- - 7 2,137.50 ( tazs Temp Check Number s Check Number 10 m Dennis Delmont 01-+415-0e0-20 Dec allowance 120'00 -----_ _ w . 1uw'mm tazs Temp Check Number 10 Check Number Ii 1 pisc»ers Gas _ . 01 . headlamp ' ' _27'00 � e7 mw ^ 'z zo�-� ouo *azs u ' '��p °~=`","�"='. ' '( .C91a o Hocmouf' Check Number 12 Dec 1988 'ri 10:15 AM 'emp Check Number 13 Claims List City of Mendota Heights Temp. Check 'umber Vendor Name -.Account Code Totals Temp Check Number -.13 'emp Check Number 14 Gold Star Printing 14 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 14 15 15 ICMA RC 15 ICMA RC 30 Totals Temp Check Number temp Check Number 16 16 Paul Kaiser 16 Totals Temp Check Number temp Check Number 17 01-4300-020-20 14 01-2072 01-4134-110-10 15 01-4268-150-30 16 Comments rpt forms 11/8 & 12/2 payroll 11/8 & 12/2 payroll Nov svc Page 3 xAmount ` 89.00 89.00 207.74 156.92 364.66 1,150.50 ------- 1,150.50 17 Torn Knuth 79-4415-832-00 project mileage 11.92 17 Torn Knuth 79-4415-860-00 10.13 17 Torn Knuth 31-4415-839-00 " 3.37 17 Torn Knuth 44-4415-848-00 7.88 17 Torn Knuth 45-4415-849-00 19.57 17 Torn Knuth 47-4415-852-00 3.38 17 Torn Knuth 48-4415-853-00 Project mileage 11.02 17 Torn Knuth 49-4415-854-00 15.75 17 Tom Knuth 50-4415-855-00 " 11.48 17 Tom Knuth 53-4415-857-00 " 3.37 17 Torn Knuth _ 54-4415-858-00 " 15.08 17 Torn Knuth 05-4415-105-15 mise mileage 8.10 ,aT.y s•T_$.. F. !7D 8E 191-2 C: . . 204 - 0 a' Wzj G, ISAJ 121.05 .. Totals LTempsChec ,Nuraber 17 Tem Chec Number18 �9'36W4'slr�2. ' 4415-105-15 Dallowancerr� Tomit,ruth�'DG*pOj,ib� �10.008 oj;y�D1-05- 1,10 F3uGsExt -- - EXb : t'CCl -10. 00 _ 3 ' ..•1.r -18r 'N '.. Check:F ��• - 1s- a =Check 'Number. z:":'�. ;• ,:�.•` n?P �:�'��'- - �;=.. - ,�y �',.. - - -� '•.rte' - - �+r`;Nit �'•5:-;' - .... =,r r .Numb ,,,fin: , ..Y #' rs:�-w+� ..._3.r,• �S? .., -: .. ... i>• .. ..�.....-Y• .-._'-: , .n .. ... ` - .-:.:�i.•. �w .-ir%.':- .-:.,.:t�.'� r . ae , �.,. b��-a CP emp„Check'. Num tier :x '19 -- •:�•« 'a`.i• - •Jii''- 4': - .::y. tiF.r -•:jt �.�� nLY•y .~ - `Y• ��+ _ .t• .ir "t' i°' 7�n" c5t gif3u O. 9!` -�ii'i#.! 3µ - ;.114:�+•'s:f, - .,9!.',i •� . �1 � .r',s'•-..-i>i " _ Final 85=3 ` 0 �'.•?,� �6bOJ..•�`•. - tr4 i'z'l.is '4!. C .`J -•T`+s- ,� --:'i.•""'� y 12 �. :°•; h" _, . 19 chard�KnutsonInc_ :sem .,:.,.42-4460-000- - 15�E. (pt ], �� 2' - -....Y=. r. •'{-..•,`.4A. 5�17/:.Ei- _ Tv :Y' -O krO -r'"`C H:.{: P.. - 5;%�:.: _818."41 - .. ii: N.,' .t,�.u, �•, - .: t._.: M _�^. -1 • ♦ _ .4� - i�'. .'S - „��i•• :-f•=y'•+N.•i1' -: •ro-. wrxa - ._r}. +'J:. �'. _ ------ - _ - ,rr•- � rtY �. 1.+' iiia5. - " .�:'µ4�- :;..,'<,=- •,i � �. :.�..7�;>'_';. "�T•,:_ .�,_ �:. .+.>•-�,x:..�i:#.3.•s_- - �.€.� - _�':�!'':x�:: - _ _ _r. .,e,'.,--^�s�.-�.`+-=d:a - _ �T^-�a`e - �.2 �-!iw,NA i 'Y ��^ - i'�_ ^S" �1�r.: �'t:� ; f'+ •. _ _ _ __ • �'c-`. .-�rt•r-� fir'!•+ 1. _.;�.�`. 2 Leef Bros Inc 01-4335-310-50 Nov svc 9.70 2 Leef Bros Inc 01-4335-310-70 Nov svc 9.65 2 Leef Bros Inc - 15-4335-310-60 Nov svc 9.65 6 29. 00 tals Temp Check Number, 22 Check Number _ 23 3 LELS 01-2075 Dec dues 175.50 3 i .. ` 175.50 tals Temp Check Number 23 Check NNumber 24 1 _ v } D +YG �b�7b'JT 7f53 - ... 3 iv.'iy�l, �• 1.9 �G'�•^J F ^F�9 (..t4TC6 SabbTT6Z 5t i1"�"' fi• r^�. IS -gin} K 4 LMCI j,,HP C/O, EBe dejjj:r J Ekja)... 01-2074 .9 �, Dec prem ry. `u y �. 570. 45 4 LMCIT,,HP C/O-�EBP nC;j " Vgwtu EO,ir.,4131-020-20 -.,;Dec prem x,0:7 �.85.60 n #sea G-Ie;la V 813502 Eunr., , 't4 ,�. rA' ru• icr}-------- 8 �+�_ •y rsd'3j hrfOT rCa1: rou 19, 5s") i90 1,386.05 talsLemp Checks umber r lzsea. E Br 4 2 -w �- _ _ 0,019 , 4 N' 00 0- its- ,,fi�rr 33 ESfic""• CIA. -br,••• •u:s•... Check'Number ? 25-,o' ?CG -bCC1Vaect.ib ;'ou .�_...... Rrta35F a:, 0 tiu;cstu� � ZXD rrt�nrr � C, puce Fxb 5 IOS 01-4330-440-20 Nov mtcn 8.68 b - ttCC.Lt ,s.. _ Cn � jiBrr Y s �' -•F!. _ -- f i'.}__ ._. -. v..}_'i-:._J, ..�v.wnet - Iv%vff, a3.. i:. ... M� ----- - f - -- J r .98. 68 - - C 1T •iz_tttR Tom' �- - .,�.'••.7-.. - . Temp CFieck"`Number :'�" ="' 25 c"• ' _ ' ' - � - ryi' ,�.:q•�-; .:•i` - - .: �,,y�., - ti' fist ? - - - - _. ._ - ••- - - ._.t' x y i'1•Si' __ _ _ _ - _ - Checrk,� umber: ' • `� 265'. .,.-. r- _ o-� - -a • �=:� .Y u._.7i.. i L `00 ...�•. _ riert. s L" }' • -e �""a.+r '-"x�• ,e- ry' i'�d: ir�'i'Bi:FC}Y tY�;.H:" 'E➢b0 •z-:'.' _ ... :F3 •'t .. 6 Metro=Waste.'Control,..r• .,`°''8;= - " svc' - =�39 848.61~:y >.. _ r : �: Y ,�, x,< t 15-4449-060-60 .'. Dec , ass. `.-w. - "=-Y: e.Er.= X17; 'cY.' .atc»rar_.. _ _ _ ��'t.. + + - •• :^�_ %4r --yo- T..T s`t•;.. rn+f^teti4' :�•j1;• �sd�ti'{. :L': _ __ - _ _ _ - .sC_ _ ._c .. dr_: s�� aM4-1 T __ _r._.— _ nth e_ _. ._. _. _. 2�1!' ^+a;� - -s. :j• . _-`__ __.. y---r+^`•sy'�7'X�tI 1988 Claims List Page 4 0:15 AM City of Mendota Heights Check Number 19 r Vendor NameA - Account Code Comments - Amount 12, 818.41.. _ tals Temp Check Number 19 c Check Number 20 0 Guy Kullander 01-4490-110-10 reimb misc expenses 39.63 r 0 Guy Kullander 05-4490-105-15 36.56 0 76.19 tals Temp Check Number 20 Check Number 21 1 Lakeland Ford 01-4330-460-30 parts 2287 26.95 1 Lakeland Ford 01-4330-490-50 rprs 80 LN 102.00 2 128.95 tals Temp Check Number\ 21 Check Number 22 2 Leef Bros Inc 01-4335-310-50 Nov svc 9.70 2 Leef Bros Inc 01-4335-310-70 Nov svc 9.65 2 Leef Bros Inc - 15-4335-310-60 Nov svc 9.65 6 29. 00 tals Temp Check Number, 22 Check Number _ 23 3 LELS 01-2075 Dec dues 175.50 3 i .. ` 175.50 tals Temp Check Number 23 Check NNumber 24 1 _ v } D +YG �b�7b'JT 7f53 - ... 3 iv.'iy�l, �• 1.9 �G'�•^J F ^F�9 (..t4TC6 SabbTT6Z 5t i1"�"' fi• r^�. IS -gin} K 4 LMCI j,,HP C/O, EBe dejjj:r J Ekja)... 01-2074 .9 �, Dec prem ry. `u y �. 570. 45 4 LMCIT,,HP C/O-�EBP nC;j " Vgwtu EO,ir.,4131-020-20 -.,;Dec prem x,0:7 �.85.60 n #sea G-Ie;la V 813502 Eunr., , 't4 ,�. rA' ru• icr}-------- 8 �+�_ •y rsd'3j hrfOT rCa1: rou 19, 5s") i90 1,386.05 talsLemp Checks umber r lzsea. E Br 4 2 -w �- _ _ 0,019 , 4 N' 00 0- its- ,,fi�rr 33 ESfic""• CIA. -br,••• •u:s•... Check'Number ? 25-,o' ?CG -bCC1Vaect.ib ;'ou .�_...... Rrta35F a:, 0 tiu;cstu� � ZXD rrt�nrr � C, puce Fxb 5 IOS 01-4330-440-20 Nov mtcn 8.68 b - ttCC.Lt ,s.. _ Cn � jiBrr Y s �' -•F!. _ -- f i'.}__ ._. -. v..}_'i-:._J, ..�v.wnet - Iv%vff, a3.. i:. ... M� ----- - f - -- J r .98. 68 - - C 1T •iz_tttR Tom' �- - .,�.'••.7-.. - . Temp CFieck"`Number :'�" ="' 25 c"• ' _ ' ' - � - ryi' ,�.:q•�-; .:•i` - - .: �,,y�., - ti' fist ? - - - - _. ._ - ••- - - ._.t' x y i'1•Si' __ _ _ _ - _ - Checrk,� umber: ' • `� 265'. .,.-. r- _ o-� - -a • �=:� .Y u._.7i.. i L `00 ...�•. _ riert. s L" }' • -e �""a.+r '-"x�• ,e- ry' i'�d: ir�'i'Bi:FC}Y tY�;.H:" 'E➢b0 •z-:'.' _ ... :F3 •'t .. 6 Metro=Waste.'Control,..r• .,`°''8;= - " svc' - =�39 848.61~:y >.. _ r : �: Y ,�, x,< t 15-4449-060-60 .'. Dec , ass. `.-w. - "=-Y: e.Er.= X17; 'cY.' .atc»rar_.. _ _ _ ��'t.. + + - •• :^�_ %4r --yo- T..T s`t•;.. rn+f^teti4' :�•j1;• �sd�ti'{. :L': _ __ - _ _ _ - .sC_ _ ._c .. dr_: s�� aM4-1 T __ _r._.— _ nth e_ _. ._. _. _. 2�1!' ^+a;� - -s. :j• . _-`__ __.. y---r+^`•sy'�7'X�tI _ Dec 1988 Claims List Page 5 r -i 10:15 AM City of Mendota Heights amp Check Number 26 Temp. Check � ., - _4 .:�_, _..,..: ,. ' ,-.lac. �... ,' z' - rts, - _, y , - - , »... z< �, • • - }Code - .. >. , - • • ,. . ._ wr,•n.--r-: ...,;+.:i:' ., sh w.t.. - 'Y. - umber Vendor Name Account Comments ..e _ Amount -' 26 Metro Waste Control* 14-3575 Dec svc 671.15cr 26 Metro Waste Control 17-3575 Dec svc 2,468.90cr 78 36, 708.56 Totals Temp Check Number 26 'emp Check Number 27 27 Midwest Wire Steel 01-4420-050-50 posts 174.00 27 Midwest Wire Steel 01-4420-050-50 posts 127.60 54 301.60 Totals Temp Check Number 27 emp Check Number 28 28 Miller Printing 01-4490-110-10 Moving cards 44.35 28 Miller Printing 01-4490-020-20 44.35 28 Miller Printing 05-4490-105-15 44.30 28 Miller Printing 15-4490-060-60 One call cards 59.00 28 Miller Printing 01-4490-iiO-10 moving cards 19.65 { 28 Miller Printing 01-4490-020-20 of 19.65 28 Miller Printing 05-4490-105-15 " 19.70 196 251.00 Totals Temp Check Number 28 7ernp Check Number 29 29 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-2074 Dec prem 151.59 29 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-4131-110-10 Dec prem 225.40 29 Minnesota Benefit Assn 05-4131-105-15 Dec prem 284.25 29 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-4131-020-20 Dec prem 503,05 29 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-4131-050-50 Dec prem 115.12 29 Minnesota Benefit Assn 15-4131-060-60 Dec prem 13.03 29 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-4131-070-70 Dec prem 99.06 '. { 29 Minnesota Benefit Assn 23-1145 Dec prem 60.00 7=z% 1 a' .ECiirED 232_-I.- &, m- 0` 9 �9' 019 01 exi 1,451.50 { Totals'7emp.Check- Number 29 Cemp Check umber__ 019 O' FII lomglica- 30-yMinhesota-Conway "- 01-4630-030-30 Gaskets/adapters "` _ 635.80 -' ,'EX.ii 6CC!, D4ar,>v 7 F'1',fi 7 CF. lk. r ,,.. �- .. -... r E"i B 4 F w t: ta. l�: r3f11.i r �! F AID d c' M4 is . - ---- 1;. T -IVC& Ex x.. ... , Totals:,,-Temp' Check Number_ .$d G.4ft1.1 /. .e.s`.L �," , j ti =.arc .+r...:t. "3:. _ "-:_"L"`..... .: -w-: 'emp Che ck`'Number� -- ,-�. x•.731 -�Sv :"�. .r u".Gu 11-e�.-Rr..'_:. dy�.:..5." '-!.. w. .. .. .F ... :_3. r .. - -. .... , . .- < - _. - r".$•' - .'.ai3 .-. ,• - ...., ,. _ - r{` _ - 31f in Mutual sL:ife Ins?;�• 01-2074." - - . r3 .YLi • Y - S•t �a 'gr Dec prem •',i. •. O_ ,7...r ....+•"i:- ,i..-.-;�t'r'k.e'i:.3:.. r'..�,e _ia2C7.'` - - '`'a' •i"` - --KEir�ti.rr' .•a r.. i, .. _ - uk '^.--�azv.:•m.. ,�•`v^.c '..s -- - :r :.,•+•.z,•«.:.,•., a.yc,::�.._ - .. - h. +fir ..5.��. • ..sem r-: ^ ,. S.: -- y +.Y.,. S'.. '�tr,w.i-^i�•'r i r.F- 'Rii.i -.3'.- 'r---CIrX» `r.V •hi - W�•Y'�-'?�^4._•r ^.Y.. _ _ -. .. .. - .� .vis ,.�+,; ,'�,;;.• ,F.. .3 "�"' _ _ _•r._i,A{S'.n.._-.w.r^nest - +n.n„M+••rtT^"n•,v. SYC+bS'•T�a�tf%�'Y".a..� y.- y,.Y,� 'uKtR.'.+Y .. •k'R..-=--alneM __..,,--i.S... - .. -' - _._ - - _- :t .. .t-�s'�a �"—'t� ` 1988 Claims List 366.54 Pace 6 0:15 AM City of Mendota Heights 366.54 Check Number 31 Nov svc 366.55 2 1,099.63 tals Temp Check Number 34 r Vendor Account Code Comments Amount -Name Nov svc 27.25cr 1 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-4131-110-10 Dec prem 3.40 I Minn Mutual Life Ins 05-4131-105-15 Dec prem 1.00 1 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-4131-020-20 Dec prem 6.80 i Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-4131-070-70 Dec prem 1.70 1 Minn Mutual Life Ins 15-4131-060-60 Dec prem 1.70 6 Nov svc 'rx ` ` �� 6-v 0-00 �• �Ji3 5.47 qty"'^ 76. 30. 60 tals Temp Check Number 31 85 Check Number 32 Nov svc 01 34.58 2 Minnesota Toro Inc 01-4330-490-70 ignition kit 61.98 2 0 tjt,��,ujnyOer � Nov svc !�E*co ��x04. 34.56 61.98 tals Temp Check Number 32 BfxQ �z� - ' Check Number 33 ---- _ - 3 Motor Parts Service 01-4305-030-30 Lens 9.22 3 Motor Parts Service 01-4305-030-30 return 4.26cr 4: 6 4.96 tals Temp Check Number 33 m±�x'' .�... y`••_ 7q t i a�' "•'�. � $bin 'rri.'.�-• �,` 'Oa�crest✓ •�@@ _ _ -i_.x^ Check Number 34 4 Northern States Power 01-4212-310-50 Nov svc 366.54 4 Northern States Power 15-4212-310-60 Nov svc 366.54 4 Northern States Power 01-4212-310-70 Nov svc 366.55 2 1,099.63 tals Temp Check Number 34 Check Number 35 '5 U S West Communications Nov svc 27.25cr Z U S West Communications r 01-4210-020-20 Nov svc 149.51 �5 U S_ West Communications 05-4210-105-15 -.. - is -ALS Nov svc 5. 28cr ,_ :+,ft .5 U S�West Communications '01-4210-030-30Nov svc-, r 112.15 �5.0 S3West Communications X01-421@-050-50 IS'" Nov Svc 35.48 ;5 U SJWest Communications 15-4210-060-60 _ Nov Svc 35.47 ;5 U S,West Communications �' •dqw; u' " Nov svc 'rx ` ` �� 6-v 0-00 �• �Ji3 5.47 qty"'^ 76. 5 U §``,gest-`Com nunicat ions 15 4210-060-60 ` 60. svc 85 :5 USW est 01-4210-05@-50 "'_=' Nov svc 01 34.58 5 U S_West,..Communicat ions - 15-4210-060-60 svc 56 �5 U S West Comrnuniea'tions 01-4210-070-70 0 tjt,��,ujnyOer � Nov svc !�E*co ��x04. 34.56 BfxQ �z� - ' ---- _ - -15 ~t•' a. �-:�., a� r''�'�n - - ". .-7,•-' "716.1 - - = _ +.'1+::2� ��:^•�.s •.:.;�;> ..'.1„. .�'+y'-t-t`�iYe2i -.,mss: _�' •r..S _+r'-.- S� - ..:f. 2 a..•s..r.-+r!;�_ . _t i "'Y..�l.S wi..,....,,. .,_. - s - _ _ _ TemCheck p. Number - 35 __ .:<A' - ._ ,. - ..,. r• a -a - )._ , ,talc 4: •ia.Y`.r FLT{i .;c - - •.l:.'v:' _.-'1+xi.' c2. =;`_-° .Ghee umber. :l.� •e36± '<,�' P '-- 'r r�.. F•tr.. 'r •�� ') - - 'c�.��Y'A - :;d s ` m±�x'' .�... y`••_ 7q t i a�' "•'�. � $bin 'rri.'.�-• �,` 'Oa�crest✓ •�@@ _ _ -i_.x^ - -.:rte: _.:�: � st.. ' 6 Ken_riel_ 90 Nov svc _ _. •.•:,�'t i .'sta'.z-i i='s!_ ...� s _ -a',�` .,-01=4221 . •. te:'s : a: w. i'k '-, i- w� - 'iTl• S': :TT'TS--."A.Y.} _ _- _- iii .. _ - :... ;r?'i"�:r,}yF _..h^'x'.3?il •'i`T✓•i.��:i!._. - ,A��''iu.fi•e.'4� "9�+.i`:_•..4+sX_-ems,"_-_ - _-�_ _._ •_ ._ ._ -. .. -... - - T+_ _ _.r -'f': ^;.--_.__.... .. ? Dec 1988 Claims List =ri 10:15 AM City of Mendota Heights Temp Check Number 36 Temp. Check dumber Vendor Name xf-Account Code Comments 36 Oakcrest Kennels 01-4225-800-90 Nov svc 72 Totals Temp Check Number 36 Temo Check Number 37 37 Oxygen Service Co. 01-4305-030-30 37 Totals Temp Check Number 37 Tomo Check Number 38 cyl act thru 10/15 r Paoe 7 i Amount 40.00 - 135. 00 8.40 8.40 38 Pine Bend Paving 01-4422-050-50 fine mix 193.70 38 193.70 Totals Temp Check Number 38 Temp Check Number 39 ' f 39 Public Empl Ret Assn 01-2062 11/18 payroll 22,561.36 39 Public Empl Ret Assn 01-4134-110-10 11/18 payroll 229.168 39 Public Empl Ret Assn 01-4134-020-20 11/18 payroll 2,252.88 39 Public Empl Ret Assn 01-4134-030-30 11/8 payroll 9.79 39 Public Empl Ret Assn 01-4134-040-40 11/18 payroll 99.14 39 Public Empl Ret Assn 01-4134-050-50 11/18 payroll 189.59 39 Public Empl Ret Assn 01-4134-070-70 11/18 payroll 107.08 39 Public Empl Ret Assn 15-4134-060-60 11/18 payroll 70.31 39 Public Empl Ret Assn 05-4134-105-15 11/18 payroll 282.40 39 Public Empl Ret Assn 23-1145 11/18 payroll 119.25 390 5,921.48 Totals Temp Check Number 39 Temp_ Check3Number bcco�ru 40 „1 4. ( J 1;. « -,AS- ZQ �.t 40 S&TzkOffice (oaua.a 05-4300-105-15 rack -W�_IN fProducts 40 S&T49ffice Products Toi., Ctafa: 05-4300-105-15 , ,,?.,desk S:_roKv '0 Jfile folders 1.ev,I y20.21 S 99.97 { 40 S&(,Office Products L?rifo d, ot4�0%-&300-105-15 �, nate rack ,Fid ��, - x,3.64 40 S&T}Office Productsjx fiolTa ENa;01-4300-020-20 " sheet protectors = - i 3' j, 6. 37 J40 S&TjLOffice iProducts•jtA M05-4300-105-15 - - Q.�misc solys x.00 _ a� _124.27 .E�o'�:_,w- 40 S&T,LOffice ProductsJ�,}�-a�ngs, -01-„•.4300-020-20 � tl- �. misc splys ` �,.0� y �,�y 234.53 40 S&T Office Products 01-4300-0.20-20 misc splys 53.32 ^�•--z1� tlGC.L • DoA..r at Tnu _ :: Y ,.. _... B+-rG a•s F w1 g !1910 fi'Jp Ali) Jt�iG tT7.V i' fig j S t �r�-..r. SK t r 280 EXb ICG -L `� Crlki 6u� p:rc as,� 452.31 ;Totals ,Temp Check Number, 40 f {..� T •- ,,.Yi r. a .: i -^4+' 3�: •:+E � ^'+r= `t ../.. r'w4-..,- •��.. - - +'jh+:.a..- a^i'•��... SP. .t. •• .. <:�`. a - ..' > . �.C..`. i `5 •,..> _—:.'..ii..,f:i e•:�. .ai _.' �'emp- Check-Numberd -- "41 s a -v.- .. ,r-^ „ r. .. t. _ ... \• -. e.. .. .'i'F•.•{.,Nc-a •7:- .-. a. ,. • h F 1• L E hau hness °Jr ` `01-4220- 32-10- - - Nov `�svc 'k •:f •r d,. g y. oNgos' H6T�1t�a ``aY I+^� '. ..� =1, 060. 80 ' . -- .. _ _ _ t..r'a:��+:.:a::•^i;s .W9.'.%.:. 2;. .�'Y' .-.Yi - t` -f. y'• �v l _- yy �• _ _ .-.l- >?,3.[?_N•' :,MV:^ F. , ei y.� �'-'^d:L�}c{c� x�:. ^�SS.}..'esu MX'be3kt �7 tits 1p}�t?X, �.... `:i. Q.-� � -'4 a .y . �f4k�-'`,S"rv::f.:...-.rte•,: ,1.F ;'a,',`G=Z.YeY�__ - -_.- - '-';(�;,x. "J:=• - • _ - ,j.+... _ _ _yi±•.._ -�^', .. _ - •,.'t''..i,: 1l - :S+.I- y+Y•� - - --- _.. r�#,. ••C.W :rT� ��e. -:t.i•,:r; +. ja�x-• .'i'F_'.^ ,t,G. ,4: ..j��:• � rv.. ..... . ...rt.w.:iw gra •' { .. ` x a a' .,.. ¢ .t'_.;.:x .. _�;-r,� --iL,.,,- •vim a Y�.v - _ •ilc'i•t.' y»..••r Y.A! . _ v . - - .. • - - •v`^�•"#.,•:�t!-a6Qv!.'.1b�4N!'3'i9.,W'A'nr.-•`.yam - .+;—+-yQG•S.�t. 'Y=a`Y.'!'=1!2R•i4 sei�Jess•tYi)4•t?iRtweM-Id:tac_-4 - -�. �.mbaeatfsei T.waP.�aewvxt�YE ®m+lnlammah/e�._:rr •a�+mAw..rr.+wam•P• •• '•••• +•i -.•. ••. _ - _ __ __ _ Z - v -Fr - - "•�'� - - .:.C. =.. - - ^1�TA Sf: ” - - i . t^, _ . � --...•Pe•'rr?'wv'/M•,•.w. "i..if5 tV .: p .. a C3 YKJ ,17 ••le'''Y - ' ..- ?_�'.. :KCi.a. wb'=4C '�.. "Z 1.'l'�..•;.)'•.•'.^`: '. •"T•n 5k...�>'-A: Y: '^:Yi .ys.__._. _ _ .,. _ ._ .,.�R•. .. ._. ....r. - ,.• tel`-�-a. -.r 1988 0:15 AM Check Number 41 Claims List City of Mendota Heights Check Number 43 'r Page 8 t' 'Amount " _ ~•91.80 ;- _ 150.45 226.95 71.40 759.90 188.70 2,550.00 27.02 7.32 34.34 3 Sun Newspapers 08-4240-000-00 City auction 84.00 r Vendor"Name not U S West -.. -Account Code Comments 3 Sun Newspapers 01-4240-080-80 Hrg 1 L E Shaughnessy Jr .--. 05-4220-132-15 -.Nov svc _ 1 L E Shaughnessy Jr 21-4220-132-00 Nov svc 1 L E Shaughnessy Jr 16-4220-132-00 Nov svc 1 L E Shaughnessy Jr 03-4220-132-00 Nov svc 1 L E Shaughnessy Jr 14-4220-132-00 Nov svc 1 L E Shaughnessy Jr 15-4220-132-60 Nov svc 7 .,;*sa1P _ r•W,� tals Temp Check Number 41 ?x 1,02.cSa6- G 8' mn Check Number 42 5 United Way Sty au1-01-2070 Dec contr 2 Snyder Drug Stores 01-4305-030-30 Misc splys 2 Snyder Drug Stores 01-4305-020-20 mise splys 4 .stir :+^9d Court i trCxou Ejgwsu u��, 9' �ir4 za- �•3 -%a' 3,3 �* 54. 50 tals Temp.Check Number 42 r�' 9 n2`�m9 Check Number 43 'r Page 8 t' 'Amount " _ ~•91.80 ;- _ 150.45 226.95 71.40 759.90 188.70 2,550.00 27.02 7.32 34.34 3 Sun Newspapers 08-4240-000-00 City auction 84.00 3 Sun Newspapers 01-4240-080-80 hrg not U S West 10.44 3 Sun Newspapers 01-4240-080-80 Hrg not United Prop 11.43 9 105.87 tals Temp Check Number 43 Check Number 44 4 Uniforms Unlimited ' 01-4410-020-20Misc Vaillancourt 185.75 4 185.75 Mals Temp Check Number 44 Check ^Number 45 'OMSkCv .,;*sa1P _ r•W,� �• .. .c-.^ ?x 1,02.cSa6- G 8' mn z 5 United Way Sty au1-01-2070 Dec contr 54.50 F 601,7 Eu _ 9 Sr- ':= 7 • 33 _ i :_.' 3n ,5 c_Ia fqy. dowru Emffr .. 6; �' el \` X301 -:1 -S` 1?:!' cts �r x,+ ---- .stir :+^9d Court i trCxou Ejgwsu u��, 9' �ir4 za- �•3 -%a' 3,3 �* 54. 50 � 'tals ,Temp CheCkiNumbe��jCa Ec.tB�, 5 .-- . - X51 -'SN r�' 9 n2`�m9 cEri�9 Ls9eTPTT!4X bsbc)1 Pa. EWdi, 9 Y --so 91 GO Check Number sus 46 •-r-Y� � e,�,. C J..F]Ft�lt.�9�Tt�;1. yr.±.:, TFi:-S9� � -- '- :: t9'i49- �tf•n _ �. 75SQ, - —011 iuhEaE;�Y�s� Iau : �.. • _ . r�� ;-, � �i +SS''y :14 6 University of Minnesota „01-1215 B D annual inst 180.00 .. SXEx.tlCCt Dee }:rogsau :. _-:. -.._ _ _ B�tQ3aFt1;3 CugnR :.h1D 5mt,rYug 2:3_succ_EuQ----- '6 EXb UCrl: Number- 180. 00 ,tals Temp Check_ - .E,- _.46.x, '4 a pp• Check_ Num47; - er •7.fsWtise�.st.rrer.rirn.Life ife^=:Ih"-n+-1n' c_' e- 'w•s= . ..�._.w-_ �"� s3:u: r' rem�FJvaT- - 1 *.z.T�$�.�t...:: •, ,;.:'r'• •�'t•��a.. : -'a.^ 1 Y^'•i. :ff. s - ."'iii+'•..CJZ'r_yy?":•4, . s.r.•_'� , a=. '.r''" - -,P f:'1y..rr,y�.'`t rpt. ;fir _ - - :C •. aR:-. .ra_ 'i Y �r: -P _ •z- _a=_k.-4':'."_=' ..i•'�',. _° - - - ..,` .t. - :3':.�.•v;: ^.+x ',i_.:+ts-, - ------'t __ at` ,t.,i, - ^f - _ •, - ::�+� 2 �•4� =n a _ 150: 0 - � J 5 - -• - r , - _ •s .p'y _::.x':` . -ti+Lz vK�+:' •c. +w ew. ._.,v _",^'L 'F"S' 'R3..�:^:H�".a ..v,_ a.__. u`•"rk"S4i X'^ Fi ._ r zF,`,^ .- •£•✓Jr/4:`,6Cr!A. _r _ Y" E^•+'dw+1Nf!.'K�i _ .H:.'- -, -- _ _ __ __ _ -r �.•-?^•.-v ,--a'i- 'i• -'t r -.. ..L.tt $._ - _. _ ,. i:T .'T +l .. '^fi:^:Z .. �.,-r... .. Dec 1988 Claims List page 9 ri 10:15 AM City of Mendota Heights emp Check Number 47 Temp. eku.rh Q.. s � .. A .r rt. ,..Kti , w 4' - a... � .cnber_Vendor Name w.M1 .sw. L,•�Hi`1''4Y... .. ..... ._. . : Account CodeComments .. .>•. ♦'. ._ ... ..., r .. . .. _ n . ♦ _ Amount L _ Totals Temp Check Number 47 emp Check Number 48 48 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4221-120-10 Sept/Oct retainer 1,000.00 ' 48 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4490-110-10 Sept/Oct retainer 17.40 48 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4222-120-20 Sept/Oct pros 2,409.38 48 Winthrop & Weinstine 16-4220-120-00 Sept/Oct Re Northland Dr 152.20 48 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4220-120-30 Sept/Oct F D regulations 726.60 48 Winthrop & Weinstine 16-4220-120-00 Sept/Oct Furlong Addn 539.20 288 4,844.78 Totals Temp Check Number 48 'emp Check Number 49 Y 49 Ashton Tate 01-4301-110-10 upgrade D base 181.80 49 181.80 Totals Temp Check Number 49 { 'emp Check Number 50 50 Baker Fire Eq 01-4305-030-30 Strainer/wrench 302.09 50 302.09 Totals Temp Check Number 50 'emp Check Number 51 51 Business Forms & Acctg 01-4300-110-10 W 2's 8.95 51 Business Forms & Acctg 01-4300-020-20 8.95 51 Business Forms & Acctg 01-4300-030-30 8.95 51 Business Forms & Acctg 01-4300-040-40 8,95 51 Business Forms & Acctg 01-4300-050-50 " 8.95 51 Business Forms & Acctg 01-4300-070-70 8.95 =51.4Business Forms A Acctg 05-4300-105-15,,,_x, " 8.95 51 Business Forms & Acctg �y_ •15-4300-060-60 " 8.99 � tis 1x' Cyi"•j •J J 1 *�`' :�x•J -:✓h8' � "'f fIWU1+92asc C'COtY7J 408 r- c a - �• �� 9' re —_--... _ _. 1" t - - 71.64 Totalsj_e_mp Check,.,.Number 51 ---_ ----- ____ Al f�19 �Check7Number SO •- �• "�:!i._ ..:.. >� imp CCSue�� riC.F 52, fygei sr Eufli. �,� q- Gg ,•�' .q .x.x'• ,-pV,c -4!52 BIIIs Sun_ Shop' �;b�r,�ki -• 01-4330-440-20 �q�s� ?,,D Cw��rf+rjprs remit gton;,870 Bslyr c� E�b18.53 { r. EXb aCCl. .. Crt4i.sv� 6xrGda,} 52 18.53 :-.vTot.al ztT,ery:p, Check Number m.. : i� :" -52, t,� °+, �', :2J .•.F.Y "4: - "Y+•. i'.i. :L .... - x. K - .r x ti ::x..�= ..x[` 'emp Check Number. » " 53_-- 79'�D "hist t, ^< ; y ?� }ti �bf 1. ti'+' [L�e.iit a c;` •r ,' •"' •"i'��$'� xA -.�: X53 CECA Ut i l it it i es' s ax . ; ^� R. , ,..54=4460-858-00- =y.w: ..�'. N�{`'iJ i.,.r..w...:l�' ^•. v4: r . mt 2 88-' s 15 631.. 85 icy_ _ _ ' ... f_a .:t.3 "..L+ sF-+_.—'n,,.•d+-.�..+'.niwxvr...'n..ws,w.:w-.L_ — '"" -5.•'t S3 -t-.-; vp.z.,rS. .'�.+�.«+,i.+e..}.ax*;}xRn. Z :!' +%iit � '�eL'' vw:� ,' _ �x�':'++k .'." - .�+z.wi«sa...w.:.S.+-_ '..-q..`^"mJ.wS.r'-»..+'�+•+!�,._•a•�.f _ _.-_ .. a-L.:a� ...-...rte."' - •• w..+ v'. •+c+ tsnra.ew>ertw• ..nY.ro irt. t Y' ✓:t:_•f - _ .!,. '.Y..'x*.l< a•" -F �" (491t;i :: �-c,..y_j s:Y�tarE •'R'. .-ar xt<6_ _ - _ - .ti .. 'Yr••.' -_ _ ..-. _. ..•:.t`^s`N_-�3.'+7r.^r:..+�.e.�.: 'w.S .rte: u.v s��. x'i r5ri: <x�MaV{:.w. Y,•'y. „w*r+,+-+�Y_ _�..�yyx. _ _ _ .._ _ .Yaw -a.}- .YC Tfl�,.,-.>,�. Fy,n,•^* _'�—Twa*,'; 1988 Claims List B:15 AM City of Mendota Heights Check Number 53 ft r Vendor Name z Account Code tals Ternp Check Number 53 Check Number 54 4 Electro Painters Inc 08-4600-000-00 4 tals Temp Check Number '54 Check Number 55 Page 10 C ,I.r_-:f�a..i ..Mw,. :.....: .. -4.•Ma a•MY i. �.i.� � '_ • � -^ Comments =r Amount 15, 631. 85 - i refinish office files 958.00 958.00 I 5 Artsign Materials 05-4305-105-15 misc splys 84.20 5 84.20 tals Temp Check Number 55 Check Number -56 _ _' 7:."" + iJ1. 7 �_. ,x 6 North Star Int'1 01-4330-490-50 rprs 303> _ _ 51.98 6 0-,+12 I _� •, ' QN 51.98 l ?f rr"+1,...: 4.•!G_ 7r_ k1 -lCLd _ .v �)' r•rY �: - . .')• •_d 4-m-+- tals Temp Check,Number yrbl. . 56 n .... u -- .• '� '-•Tc ,c - i,• rn c, r- rc;lC) a} 4! +C•} i7 cc'} f jJn)ic _• = 3 �' :,+!!' C' _2 �� < y �• do to k Check ;Number `57Y "`t '.1T'-y=ir6 +7 -lift•-• ")T T Om,4;vf_Ci ,:# •7• �c+,., -.' G¢ - i• OP -.tar.-t• 7 N D�C41C T V_ _,�,_ 01-4404-110-10 _ mbrshp _ _ 10.00 710.00 talsf Temp Check Number _ _ , _. 57 Check Number 58 8 Great ~Western <Sply Div 01-4300-020-20 envelopes 82.29 8 QS35 ,......dci ilure r stTAIG Lao E) ta15+,Temp Check�Numbera�Ths _ma 58 , 00 9" Y-119 S3'a UgVJxttxa;t..stIAr. 0 CheckN�mber -�qLuruzf� �9�ns E©s O '$' 99 _ 51' R)=J tem ` bGwrui2fr.,sg•Tn15 Ess Fl 1g• 19O 19' 190 !9' 09 - 9 Holden BusinessiEprms F-ssa Eudi_01-4300-020-20 , aletterhead �, �� 232.05 9 Holden Business Forms 01-4300-110-10 - w - letterhead 255.26 c -- -Forms o - s : ~O. a r O' Of . _ v O ti i 9 Holden HusinestFormsjl'.'05-4300-105-15 �, rl-etterhead 29F, 50--_E,.�� Y255. 25 9 Holden Business Fo"rms -..01-4300-020-20 Envelopes 325.45 9 Hold Business �Eorms�.- `01-4300-110-10 8rro6F Wil �,r.o�Envelopes) tslrazttc 4�1,. '•.'-4488.20 ; 9 Hoi@en Business Forms 05-4300-105-15 Envelopes D. �8 488.15 9 Holden Business��Forms *::ra. Crt��suf` - _2nd sheets u�resa$ 411.72 = = - 01-4300-020-20 < ; 9 7. Holdey�� Business'F`6^ms 01-4300-110-10 .'{ �' r -:'_ 2nd sheets r<w 3.23.44 _ Uv f[X} -- ,F' ir•}• 'rt'7R-..,..... ,•t- y -:%v� _ ..'l:z'r.a.•`a_`. is s...',r .. o r_�ry" ;I:�arf-sXi-`i.=,.;: - 9 Holden,Hus,iness Forms` -s?�" 05-4300 05-15 "2nd 1 '"� sheets :=i.; ��,a:r.-4ri'. y.,�' _-. �s:JUC.. t/=• ''? ^i .. -~ty - ---- _ _ cy: 1 . n+' _ s*=.: � ' *s- ` •_ _ - �• - - 2 102. 96 F -'�, -Y` -.e '+. `:+:`' "'"F.'ka+:. ,. -rt & t, -- - moi° -i- "'�.'ti>•�.' , _S« tah em "Check Number" ,;T••'' -S9 �'1• " - - ;F:�_ _ `''t" _ - -�;�." •'y : - .f.';.��'-r•' - C',�. � .�'.'E' ;, ":�.'.-,• ,;=+.".`+-s> 1a"'�s: t'.r`. S. p _��<+1?_ - KyEi fY'!4. a ],_ '=41P: c.o __ - zF'.'• ":.n_..�...t4..-, ., -q". }. ': _ :a .# a�; p <u,f�iY�. _�... _ '•ai?.a..•:�.� [7 Y.�`-iu (��b F,:�.`...•,�`'- .f.:'' _ _ - Lr,.:fs..7:. 9.``''#St -�r.� ,�'fd.°y*•5,::�._ !.'L",:�-YT•?Y�s-T. a 4 ..AY ".h„Gi°�Tv�• .i''.j:...Gr�a4" .�: �..fr,'� 3��.4 LI.. 'fT ,Z:"•iT�•-''' •+.2. f _ y.�"'�'....---�'`'• _- _ ,: -' :x•.,. .: �`,-•.,...- ivy's .. �..,..r ..tv- -r _ _ .,Y�.: ::.5.� _ :i,, .,... «•�•..� �.�-� �}, ... -nl�. .^y'�J+'>.. :':tts._.:ri-Y_u•-_.,.,Y«w.;+.. 5�8,",.F :. f-�;+.- -•�:;z ?'t• x. .S�. - f'.'W:P" �. �""' ;"#•n.._ :'?'.'S== _ '-••, -. ,-_', 3..::`.,:':sr .;e.;. N' :,'Sa: .'�Y �;`-'T fi ^•�.,." - a,+•t rr n- _ ,r�_ ':k 't! .+. »Y;"' ^:Zi: ..•„.. �;,� - - _ - - .e?• � "� _' .-s-.. ,53s• .:,t :jam.. ,:�:' - <ae t_�.fr'3`.i•§� _,f .. IX-.a.�.,ti' .%�'."� . �.,},� .1' 4' - .,� •.Y'---.zm's w:s s:: C'd4sc_, �: �f•-,a. .. -a ': �:Xr?._. -� ='4i1. "°�,: • .v'' k:- =.ilei. _.rV _ '"•d :'. .. X.. .:•'�.'!'^�t- "".13Y:'#':� - .�F;"'-s,,"�.'3r: }: -•31 �+' :.P'.r.'A^ :Fk aa�`:wt *� e_. 't s, �rvi_ :T:• ':s�<eF". «.E��--...'- - - `_d _.�`d^ --::yi''?'�'.::-�-`'-=�.:.'.'.,`„..-.,,it +f :x.,. ,. ..-C •w:ll .'f'a'g. r.. - .. rT_`_7z .�-:l. .�F. .sR7•�.... n. ...YYl�.3 +'_�¢+r X!r'vr :..:ei.^� `«•^5+.=],.-rv:Y•!"�..p.�.:2 '... .-_. .- o- _ _._--- ___�..."tri _ _ - ./ ._- _ _- - -_- .. - •� ki Dec 1988 Claims List Page 11 ri 10:15 AM City of Mendota Heights 'emp Check Number 60 Temp. heck-t`- Check-t`- lumber lumber Vendor Name _ Account Code Comments = Amount 60 LaBelle Storage & Moving 08-4490-000-00 Moving C H ..,,.... :1,748.00 60 1,748.00 Totals Temp Check Number 60 'emp Check Number 61 61 Mike Thomas TV & Appl 08-4620-000-00 Appliances City Hall 1,337.00 61 1, 337. 00 Totals Temp Check Number 61 'emp Check Number 62 -62 Hagen Office Eq 01-4330-440-20 computer rprs 64.50 62 64.50 Totals Temp Check Number 62 'emp Check Number 63 63 Interstate Diesel Products 01-4330-460-30 rprs 2287 269.89 63 269.89 Totals Temp Check Number 63 'emp Check Number 64 64 Lawson Products 01-4305-050-50 mise parts 135.00 64 Lawson Products 01-4305-070-70 mise parts 135.00 64 Lawson Products 15-4305-060-60 mise parts 135.01 192 405.01 f Totals Temp Check Number 64 'emp Check Number 65 4,65jU_S_-_.West Business Resources 01-3365 163-T !nw rfd excess variance fee 96.00 G9 9' 011 7777- �65�Tz gnIUWYF.1. dccorru4 N x`99 WGG G-OPQ Totals Temp Check Number 65 _ 7777 7777 7777 _ �.. -. A -.. t ... Aou�i i 9nwetJ� - 9' =Gfa G* �f�_. _ f4' FJ1 0. �. ,- _ emp Check Number h r,o� �6 66,i • 66 North Stir'-Ri`sk-.Syc- ', 01-4250-110-10„_,,renewal,, <..33 �.�..... - xo� 8,-ra sr W.O Public ,Ofc - bond 1 180.00 'u jr Fi I. � . - . - _ - EXb kiCC.x .• .,:r.�L ... - 66 ..” ' :,_ - al =µ o Check Number i! - �...:p.t.7+.R^ .. .Y�+.'i`r- f•=;�'�N'�' _ - I .. e_.,.. . .. , .t. _et..*I .>2:.�. .�: , 'em Check '- Number -1 67 _ P. x...11 `� �'.._Y - .?',e'at'r•x�_`g•.* a''!i `i- lCf't,} (•�r�1+I1 •"�=,'� '/USE•%•AF%/�t1it�wf/l' �.H;}:_ •14,;/F+r(i/� �.','R. - •�'ya_! - ._f �LY •'•�.,��n �r� i-_r`�,ti�:_� -.iY♦,un.. . „� �'� • ' w_ D.'-:' `.f• - ,T^:' ... .i '.-�' ''".:'•o'."s'- `ear Y - _ T.�I�.�I,�"•,�s'{•?J,'+7T4 ��ar � --Y a Noack 0-050-50=1988 . clothing allowance �4- =�> .. ;" `a'?t-fi '440a °' . - _,' .'N, _0`167Geor ,.. -_ .':i:0v_ ;. - :,<• a:=i,:. - - _ - '•ri«iN:..-r`.n� _.r:i" " .:T .� � !+,`-,� .'ri'.-rr.'gr - - ia� 77.77 '»� „.,,,,•,,.�—.: .4 w."r.�. ..qj .,ir.RrS..i est ad;••,.yam`-k__„rR�-a.,..»:-t-.� .:sav_ ,e'.-.•r`-�.,-.ten:,..-'..'.�.-._�..-... ... A, � _ J„ e..c....«.:R;b s�•i'�. e.43':'41; ';-••_: c,i.�. -_ dx.,, "•K--+ i•=-_ .ii fir. �:•- C' -i< 4vra c J'-.= "_£', � ..{2'':., `-_ x�•k�a - :�i... - - - - - •.., .,, • Ste. 1 :� F`•�; . - aG-'� 'S. .,n .rt.r.'1'Iw� y..r: -rt .. t; _ - _...,_...a...�•.'iis �f _..,_ .. ,I_y._�___-__�_ .r� ._. _ ._-. _ _ _ _ `c ..r y:.-af _ _ _.:_..rr a .. - r _ - - .r .. 'C-. _ - -, .. ..- .. .-- !'•_ _ - ...L v,,. 1988 Claims List Page 12 a:15 AM City of Mendota Heights 0 Leonard Perron 01-4268-500-30 f heck Number 67 930.00 0 930. 00 tals Temp Check Number.- 70 T�5_; . - - 'Amount - r Vendor Name Account Code Comments-- ^� i Maxfield Research Group ,__,,,, 16-42220-000-00 Re Hwy 110 & 7 r, 1,700.00 _ 140.00 tals Temp Check 'Number 67 1,700.00 Check Number 68 B Labor Relations Assn 01-4424-050-50 Sept svc 66.90 B Labor Relations Assn 01-4224-070-70 Sept svc 66.90 B Labor Relations Assn 15-4224-060-60 Sept svc 66.95 4 yYi 9' Co. 200.75 tals Temp Check Number 68 K)- s�rzt. ' Check Number 69 2 Minnesota Glove'F b,ituiu E01-4305-070-70 y ,.,gloves �, s 9 Prime Source 08-4600-000-00 Storage shelves 2,011.75 9 Prime Source 08-4600-000-00 Storage shelves 176.10 B 19' 190 34. 80 2,187.85 tals Temp Check Number 69 Check Number 70 0 Leonard Perron 01-4268-500-30 Snowplowing 1-88 thruNov 930.00 0 930. 00 tals Temp Check Number.- 70 T�5_; . - - Check Number 71 r ^� i Maxfield Research Group ,__,,,, 16-42220-000-00 Re Hwy 110 & Lex 1,700.00 1,700.00 tals Temp Check Number 71 Check Number T4 T I 4` r,- 72fi -"'j -4-2 F+ee eewam f bo j 7= EladL =,r' PTIQ�' yYi 9' Co. 2 Minnesota Glove; bA;, - 01-4305-@50-50 �l u `bran q a,1- gloves K)- s�rzt. 0' ON n' 2 Minnesota Glove'F b,ituiu E01-4305-070-70 y ,.,gloves �, s 9' ��,g 5] 1.60 2 Minnesota Gloves 2bec� Ecrdx - 15-4305-060-60 N..gloves G.��, G..G 0i1_60 - o e5 : tssarpTTsgX bsbpr,.re EMdtr. t7' 9'ySr 19' 190 34. 80 d�d+p r-stlyT btrpT res,cir•u 61' so 0- :04 tals�Temp Check: NumberafTd-3P i 72 19.' S{1 Q' QO Or ,rr 6i" tt'T alt} $4j93.7S? u6an.j'sF, .. " 5 Frr 0:9 tv•ON i Q'0,17 r,- - .-`•_ ., - ChecW Number 73 E:lb..tiCC-L Dred-Tbcrorr • 5i1g7:sC '3 vUD {�:Uc,(-TPt' ��3� Fi1:fCJfR1� Pa7vuCr. ;rAb - 50.00 Erwin MontgomeryL.Const Co 38-4460-844-00 Blvd grading 86-13 �,14$afi "Y 50. 00 ;fGGOCiIiiT.'_ ,"`7 ::+:. .'•i{.:..". ':.a - a.'i'.-- - t�ls Number f ' '@-- �s.. : • .. tk Temp Check 73 yumber hec } Z .5:`.s .:si..:i=. �,{'• - _ — _ aJ'q ry,i1 '?ntY• :.J4^�6 ::'�: '=`f-' -:.'x6da. '4 American .Nati 'Bank �Y6-4456-000-00 - Amer _.' ReSoo Line RR •-162,'14@.00 . : Dec 1988 3 10:15 AM amp Check Number 74 Claims List City of Mendota Heights Page 13 Temp. - •', -.;a .. vt.. .z�, .,m., :., a - _ .r -', . ..s ��_svt.e, - _ �„=T.': `. •i -..a ..•,.s.bri a4. _ - _• �, umber Vendor Name_- Account Code Comments Y!Amount 74 162, 140. 00 Totals Temp Check Number 74 emp Check Number 75 r a 75 P & T Communication Prof 08-4620-000-00 cable installation C H 1,092.00 75 P & T Communication Prof 08-4620-000-00 197.10 150 1, 289. 10 Totals Temp Check Number 75 emp Check Number 76 76 Reliable 01-4300-020-20 mise splys 52.90 76 52.90 Totals Temp Check Number 76 emp Check Number 77 c 77 Schaaf Comml Lawn Care 01-4490-040-40 weed cutting 640.00 77 640.00 Totals Temp Check Number 77 emp Check Number 78 78 State of Minn 01-4402-110-10 1988 statutes 140.00 78 State of Minn 01-4402-020-20 1988 statutes 140.00 --- - 156 280.00 Totals Temp Check Number 78 emp Check -Number 8xes�u.�re79 �� tft}I2` WTItS'YdG a• tjtYtO UTTOW-n-Ics 79 Sawyer Cleator. Lbr Co 08-4620-000-00 "3 G* Qn ' A� !!indow parts C, H $� h� 22 _ 79 Saw er Cleator Lbr:Co 08-4620-000-00 g �, window blinds CH, �K) 666.74 Y�.�._ } mc3�7 6a.- s4 f� Q9J ---- --- tta3ad' Cou_;f%, tc;pTo" bqm;u E-181, 119@'tib t3• Go R' Q^7 680.96 158 4-5zes bTse.1a I RtOGa F_u0f. Totals�,_T.emp Check, Number ^; rE • Q'•i Vii" Is b�tio� �a79,}3i. ^ - ' -r • ON •t' 544 • -•m..+- t t'S ' TG 1 T !J A PJ' QO !4' Q' 1 F �s GG G _ ... _ . , 'smp Che c �:IVumber 2'oiT Iut�aL80;3sTorc�su Q'Q� Q'Gll� ,g80 SnoiGGarde-I:nc_Gt�rbpruu~ •,• , 01-4305-050-50 g,= 6e � bwa�rlice meltig :1U1ViY/t{ �sTsHos c,(L10.56 - ^- 80 Sno Garde Ince tiCGi 01-4305-070-70 .BI t Guf , a�rygd<~r 0.56 80 Sno Inc .._ +=:, ;�:' - 15-4305-060-60 __ ice melt _. 10.56 _- V , „•_; ,Garde �'ti�a�A� GGG[tli' .��`'�-A.�Ne.. - -,- - _ _ �.:.`,_;# �a:v- - - _ • • -..4 ~rSiar.d.v w $ ".«..•_. . •: - `- _, _- _ _. .f- - - _ ----- . •.>_. -_ F.� - <� _ - X31.68 1. -.240 _- - _ Totals Temp Check"Number . .s'-. 80 ` `' ,A-4, ,{eugtT�� {fir >m 6hec Numb r" - ..�'� _ =�. .l4G[3fJ iwk- � --" - �7fi ,S"a rsbrK.` ��;''= c! 2 - - _PT - - _.'`Y•.��s - `ifs _ M'µ ~ - - - - 7'4' F.*.v -- _ -:T"'<' (- - . t t1'- - - 1988 Claims List Page 14 0:15 AM City of Mendota Heights heck Number Bi R r Vendor Name Account *Code Comments Amount 1 Wahl & Wahl 08 -46207000-00 telephone wiring C H 3,345.00 "-37 1 4. 1 tals Temp Check Number 81 Check Number 82 2 Wenzel Mech 01-4335-315-30 rpr leak 217.22 217.22 tals Temp Check Number 82 Check Number 83 3 Zee Medical Svc 01-4305-050-50 medical splys 16.50 3 Zee Medical Svc 01-4305-070-70 medical splys 16.50 3 Zee Medical Svc 15-4305-060-60 medical splys 16.45 9 49.45 tals Temp Check Number 83 Check Number 84 4,Edwi,nBurrows 01-4260-640-12 genl election 88.75 4 99 1 T 88.75 tals Temp Check Number 84 Check rfumber J�- . 5 Marjorie Cheesebrow -.-01-.4260-640-12 genl election 92.70 5L 92.70 t.1s,Temp Che6k,Number 85 Che.zS02 =-Ua;- �'umber 86 __0-:3c �-TOlq t�LuT- E1J0$- TT-* Z33 -53'92,:3'!57,+ "T^ 6 Sally.Count^ an_pcpjedGij OLl-4260-640-12 :M _%enl elect3On fin85.00 ,, \+S93 'bTSV;!� V 2bsca EM&, G 12" 2S T`tl 0819, a3 - T 6, -5 a -',J 6 ISRS " FMBA' 13 0.100 0* -501 19,049 f85.00 tals, ,,,1emp Check. Nijmber,,,,,,,, .. 86 i .310 T-93, P-7 -S-Us' 2s 0, N, (9110 'tm- 00 - 10 T !7' Is; IN! E;hec�7-Aumber'802"- 7 TeresaLEsslinqer,b'T,;,, 01-4260-640-12 electionJ6.25 J6.25 WID UW'.-7,9pn1 -;;Wr%Z Ex EXb UCCI ----- sclada;' ' 7 I . t' . 76 25 tals ,!mt3,,,Check Number 87 .7 I ee—lkrf P Check Number 88 7 711 61i; -M A T 'F .1, jean Franson 61.40�12 W Imax. genl election 1 : 1-40 Dec 1988 Claims List Page 15 ri 10:15 AM City of Mendota Heights emp Check Number 88 Temp. Check lumber -,Vendor -Name Account Code Comments 'Amoun C 88 R 91.40 Totals "Temp Check Number SS emp Check Number 89 89 Janan Gainor 01-4260-640-12 genl election 77.50 89 77.50 Totals Temp Check Number 89 emo Check Number 90 90 Rita Green 01-4260-640-12 genl election 92.45 90 92.45 Totals Temp Check Number 90 remp Check Number 91 91 Mary Hartz 01-4260-640-12 genl election 77.50 91 77.50 Totals Temp Check Number 91 remo Check Number 92 92 Patricia Hettinger 01-4260-640-12 genl election 78.75 92 78.75 Totals Temp Check Number 92 Temp Check Number 93 93 Rosemary Hildebrandt 01-4260-640-12 genl election 76.25 93 76.25 Totals Temp Check Number 93 i 4-eia �--nWD - AA Temp Check Number- 94 --- rr 9r3 06 lo;gro- 6F?vjLUYLx t$CGo-(vk1; P, M N," 9. 013 77.50 94 Mary Ann Hoyt 01-4260-640-12 ___genl election__- F-Oderr LpnpjTCS;To#j ,-01 i9" ON T,19 7.50 94 bi,04- ISSt!gT eSL&YCsa . Totals Temp Check Number 94 , EXUMCI DOac�,TtytTQtJf Baads; AID tjujoaw; Al, E?,3 'zLIcz EX 0 Temp Check. Numberr=Xb QCCI 95 C"IJLGu; E, IW16', RaIp ohns 01-4260-640-12 genl election 85.00 k 85.00 95 ZuTotaIs JRmp Check Number 95 TgX 9�4',:'AOVAOCI's 14G T O'd Xt� ;K;, al— 1988 Claims List Page 16 0:15 AM City of Mendota Heights Check Number 96 5 r Vendor'Name t Account Code �''' Comments Amount 16 Cynthia Klecatsky 01-4260-640-12 genl election 77.50 16 77.50 ,tals Temp Check Number 96 Check Number 97 17 Marsha Knuth 01-4260-640-12 genl election 81.40 17 81.40 ,tals Temp Check Number 97 Check Number 98 I 18 Nancy Kruse 01-4260-640-12 genl election 90.00 Ig 90.00 -tals Temp Check Number 98 { Check Number 99 ( 19 Geraldine Lerbs 01-4260-640-12 genl election 77.50 19 77.50 { Mals Temp Check Number, 99 Check Number 100 , r•_t:uc )0 Rita Maczko 01-4260-640-12 genl election -� 90.00 r?°'f4 C^�'�^_ sc�r_'r {_^a,:2 10 { '{ -•, m.j 90.00 .4 t ___a i lir J �T• 'M'.-� _. . 1 rtals_Temp Check Number 100 Check Number {_,za^ si,,E :a "{'C-ic'7 !_ 7 3T'i �4U17 J �R1Gl. fi HubeF� Mei e'rt,r,a -4260-640-12 •-{ -� • •..: enl '.' ,� election' `.• .rl+} < r.ncFroIJ acrctr11 SP1 e�.fp Fj 6151 x,70.00 -- 1{591 t,j5h{U T gbsoa" Fkt'L.L. 91 �'3S tes=SD; 17Fti {�s ;�r:>.*r3 c��8r J :' i:9 }' t ' �•3 7----- ti0.00 )tals,Temp CheckjNumberj„t 2,;,,iG7s+101�{a�- cf x+a4 r✓ :Ji bnprres+7c�u 7 :9"i3Sr r3"0� 9'S 9 Check�Nurnber 1rJ2b6GFT,102_GO� ' Ewrr - ;; .r' }zd �' "SI) ;Ij Of Ue�. ksca _ t n �t t8' T3O �' 9r� m <- - .. ` - 72 Darlene Misnergr T,e Ueaa,gt•. 01-4260-640-12 ,,. genl election..,.,;, 75.00 92 Evfnr W -Ir -'•i 1'j6�GL-Tb4T61! 2I.+:r r,S 711• 75.00 Stals Temp Ch Number 102 gnu .,�..... Cfts,wt:%J� _ •(G.::.:. s ,Check_Nurnber,'`,+'- 103 p _ -Na 7P -S' AUT 93 Eileen Mullen{r ;.01-4260-640-12 genl election 88.75 _ " +C,r�T 0& D;ar.rga$sf NerrIP-Pa ----- D3 *' .: Wy_�.. '�:_ ' -,..:, : •, _.� - -. :Exb�s +gsrCcr.sry1�o, F - hsCe. 88. 75 - Mals 'TeWCheck Number" - 103 .- 11 Dec 1988 Claims List Page 17 ri 10:15 AM City of Mendota Heights 'emp Check Number 104 Temp. Check lumber Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount 104 Rosemary Murphy e1-4260-640-12 genl election 77.50 104 77.50 Totals Temp Check Number 104 7emp Check Number 105 105 Marilyn Nelson 01-4260-640-12 genl election 75.00 105 75.00 Totals Temp Check Number 105 Temp Check Number 106 106 Dolores Radabaugh 01-4260-640-12 genl election 76.25 106 76.25 Totals Temp Check Number 106 Temp Check Number 107 107 Annabel Randolph 01-4260-640-12 genl election 77.50 107 77.50 Totals Temp Check Number 107 Temp Check Number 108 108 Carol Redding 01-4260-640-12 genl election 80.00 108 80.00 Totals Temp Check Number 108 temp Check Number 109 109 Theresa Redding 01-4260-640-12 genl election, 77.50 '-.Ta eaWW1J,,A -=OaUp 2� 109 77.50 Totals,.T,Tp Check.-.Number''.c.,Aja -4r(zS remo Check Number 110 S: xM 110 11 ene j Rosenbaum. 01-4260-640-12 ?.:genlelect* i 86.25on 0 ir-xb Occl na—XOPYOU 86.25 -, Totals Temp Check Number 110 Temp.,;Che§<:�,Number - 1.2 1OT-0\91- I11 Arvid Rued- 01-4260-640-I2 genl election 89.25 px OL WOUCO;V -11, -CT - 89. 25 --L:-Totals -T-eraprChecW--Number- 141 7— 1988 Claims List Page 18 3:15 AM City of Mendota Heights heck Number 112 r Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount Virginia Simek 01-4260-640-12 genl election 80.00 80.00 tals Temp Check Number 112 Check Number 113 3 June Wagner 01-4260-640-12 genl election 88.75 3 88.75 tals Temp Check Number 113 Check Number 114 4 Laurita Weinzettel 01-4260-640-12 genl election 94.00 4 94.00 tals Temp Check Number 114 Check Number 115 1. 5 Linda Weinzettel 01-4260-640-12 genl election 75.00 5 75.00 tals Temp Check Number 115 Check Number 116 6 John Maczko 01-4300-030-30 reimb solys expense 25.37 6 25.37 tals Temp Check Number 116 Check Number 117 7 William Lerbs 01-4335-315-30 reimb expenses 176.62 7 William Lerbs 01-4305-030-30 reimburse expenses 22.83 4 -. __ 199.45 tals Temp:Check_Number 117 ='i - .. Check -Number 8 Suzanne Ilten y 08-4220-000-00 Re artwork C H 6,500.00 Gij i_� a=_, __ �G EAG:..: 31. P]U 8 nr. f•�s;:.- .i f. .7"•°"iF^ i'c i. t+ --------- �. . 6, 500. 00 = Xb Mals Temp Check Number 118 L"dGGOfiF.iF l Check Number+ 119 .. _;ai Fa_zrs 9 Col,lAns Electrical Const 31-4460_-839-09 .Aub E{s,3Ci;rf�i pymt 6 final 86-1 3,405.88 ,e 8aG:..r Exbouc{i¢A'i:b _ b�s� ------ 3,1405. 88 Dec 1988 Claims List Page 19 ri 10:15 AM City of Mendota Heights emD Check Number 119 Temp. Check lumber Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount Totals Temp Check Number 119 emp Check Number 120 120 Annandale Contr 47-4460-852-00 pymt 5 87-5 7,238.24 120 7,238.24 Totals Temp Check Number 120 emp Check Number 121 121 A M M 01-4400-110-10 11-3 mtg 14.00 121 A M M 01-4400-109-09 11-3 mtg 14.00 242 28.00 Totals Temp Check Number 121 temp Check Number 122 122 Acro Minn 01-4300-640-12 ballot pens 34.68 122 34.68 Totals Temp Check Number 122 Temp Check Number 123 123 Dodd Technical Corp 01-4600-110-10 Laser jet printer 2,616.00 123 Dodd Technical Corp 01-4490-110-10 Gender chance 30.00 246 2,646.00 Totals Temp Check Number 123 Temp, Check Number 124 124.Home Lbr - 01-4330-490-50 r side board 301 5.04 124,.1-- P--TtIJVIV.A 5.04 Totals Temp, Check Number 124 4-T3 -emp Check Number 125 Mendota HghtsiFire Relief Assn,06-4490-000-00 ..01988 participants 11,754.05 125 Menbo'ta Hghts.,Fire Relief Assn 01-4330-460-30 reimb ck 1040 6q rprs 340.43 125 Mendota Hghts Fire Relief Il Assn -01-4335-315-30 reimb exp tape 23.27 3752, 117. 75 Totals Temp, Check Number 125 emp Check 'Number- 126 TTP -4 0,12 -CitK40f St Paul 6. 01-4305-020-20 Aug Svc 117. 00 77": 784)3126- - - --- .-- I I 11-�' 00 1988 d:15 AM heck Number 126 Claims List City of Mendota Heights r Vendor Name Account Code tals Temp Check Number 126 Check Number 127 7 Midwest Wholesale Tire 01-4330-445-40 7 tals Temp Check Number 127 Check Number 128 B North Star Chapter I C B 0 01-4400-040-40 B tals Temp Check Number 128 Check Number 129 Page 20 Comments Amount tires 272.95 272.95 12/9 mtg Berg/Gill 30.00 30.00 0 9 Brad Ragan Inc 15-4330-490-60 tires & balance 163.72 9 163.72 { tals Temp Check Number 129 MANUAL CHECKS: 5 11921 58,051.10 American Natl Bank City Hall pymt 311,929.50 Total 11922 32.40 Klayton F.ckles Mileage 11923 99.23 Guy Kulaander reimb moving expenses 11924 1,000.00 Goodhue County waraant 11925 468.04 Petty cash fund replenish petty cash 11926 2,730.25 Window Whse Blinds City Hall 11927 28,816.15 Facility Systems Office furniture 11928 5,871.35 PERA 11/4 PERA .11929 4,613.09 Comm of REvenue 11/4 & 11/8 SIT 11930 9,997.39 Dakota County Bank 11/18 FIT, FICA, MEDIAARE 11931 755.00 It 11/8 Payroll deductions 11932 3,459.56 SCCU it 11933 31,388.56 City M.H. Payroll acct 11/18 net payroll 11934 void 11935 2,000.00 U. S. Post office refill postage meter 149,28272 - - - --- <<.:�. G.T, 461,21-1.72 .� •*:. �'FiFi -- ,w: t_A. �i� +l=..lr4.7sY DC7 �U::3 ! CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO DECEMBER 2, 1988 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. dt ze ,,Administrator SUBJECT: Resolution of Support for School District #197 Excess Levy Referendum At the meeting of November 15, Council indicated its interest in having a presentation at the December 6 meeting concerning the School District 197 excess levy referendum. Council also indicated its interest in having a resolution of support for the -referendum available for its consideration the same evening. Attached is a proposed resolution which I have prepared. Dr. Bruce Anderson has indicated that he will have either a member of the School District staff, or someone from the Parent's Committee supporting the referendum present at the Council meeting. By Tuesday evening, we will know who that person is and their name can be added to the agenda under the introduction section. KDF:madlr attachment CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RE -SOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT #197 EXCESS LEVY REFERENDUM TO BE HELD DECEMBER 20, 1988 WHEREAS, Mendota Heights, being predominantly a residential community, is dependent on the availability of high quality public schools to maintain its health and vitality; and WHEREAS, Independent School District #197 has scheduled a December 20, 1988 excess levy referendum; qnd WHEREAS, successful passage o Mtg_a_� —re-lerendum is necessary in order to maintain and strengthen the quality of public education in the community. NOW THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the Council hereby finds that passage of the December 20, 1988 excess levy referendum is necessary to maintain the current quality of -life y'i the community. The Council hereby further resolves that it encourages all citizens of the community, regardless of whether they are Varents of District #197 students, to carefully study this issue, and_= -Gast -ng --a_ . Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 6th day of December, 1988. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City clerk November 21, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council, City i� or FROM: Dennis J. Delmont, Chief of Police 01P SUBJECT: Stop Sign Request for Walsh Lane Discussion i I reviewed Mr. Gunderson's request, and Jim Danielson's recommendation. Walsh Lane is a minor collector, but its traffic is generated internally and it doesn't provide any advantage for people attempting to get from Victoria to Lexington, or vice versa. As a result, I would feel more comfortable with using "Yield" right of way signs at the points where Rolling Green Curve, Windwood, Oxford, and Stratford intersect with Walsh Lane. This would serve the purpose of causing that traffic to stop and check right of way before entering onto Walsh Lane, and should solve the problems that Mr. Gunderson spoke of. That "Yield" signs be posted at those points where Rolling Green Curve, Windwood, Oxford and Stratford Lane intersect with Walsh Lane. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO October 25, 1988 f TO: Mayor, City Council and City m'n for FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Stop Sign Request Staff recently received the attached letter from Mr. Vern Gunderson requesting that stop or yield signs be added to Walsh Lane (see attached map). Walsh Lane is a neighborhood collector street for the Rolling Green Addition similar;to Copperfield Drive in Copperfield. RECOMMENDATION: Stop or yield signs would be appropriate for roadways intersecting with Walsh Lane. ACTION REQUIRED: Determine if stop or yield signs are desired along Walsh Lane and if they are, direct staff to prepare the appropriate ordinance for publication. J: - I I , I I I I ---- I'/ I - / - I - I I 1 .01 - - I I I '. I ./ / /." 1916 Walsh Lane Mendota Heights, MN. 55118 October 17,1988 City Council City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Attn: Jim Danielson Dear Council Members, I would like to request that stop or yield signs be installed at the following streets where they enter Walsh Lane: Stratford Road Oxford Court Windwood Court Rolling Green Walsh Lane is a north -south collector street between Victoria Road on the East and Lexington Ave. on the West. I have observed several instances where cars entering Walsh Lane from these streets without stopping or slowing have caused near misses with cars traveling on Walsh Lane. School buses travelta number of times each day on Walsh Lane (sometimes at excessive speed), and this is an additional hazard. Sincerely yours, Vernon A. Gunderson CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 28, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City, i4 ' Orator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Vacation of Silk Avenue Council recently approved a preliminary plat for Valts Addition. All the City maps had shown Silk Avenue, a road right-of-way that runs down the center of the Valts Addition plat as vacated. Mr. Kuross, the platts de- veloper recently learned from his abstract company that not all of Silk Avenue has been vacated, therefore he and the other contiguous landowner have applied to have it vacated (see attached map for area to be vacated). RECOMMENDATION: Mr. Kuross and Mr. Mickelsons are dedicating the needed road right-of- way for the area with their new plat therefore the City no longer needs Silk Avenue and staff recommends that it be vacated. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to -implement the staff recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 88- , RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY. 3� i W-"- *j t 43S 5� /• • [ a 'I'!�. 7= j P/0 z,/ 9 " ;l 3 2 I 4' o a S u 6a N 89*-- s� �.. 4. �'�` •112'.i'E t�r 1 A A A �` /• I' 173 O• N 2 n - �' a 3 I ls 3 y ' I 13 I 2 3 1Y I LOT 1 £N510N5 / �d, t ti 13 olM o 3 •_ / V LOT I c O % !r 5• / / ° 2 T FOR C O I 2 3 ct i 0 i/ ( %I 1 P,p, I 2 2 OD Pv+ / , ti3 oti L Z 5 Z 3 52•- ; - I' ;0 k5££ 3 Z� 1 EPL �. / I I qm 13 �, + S . . Lor I .E �\ p' •O.. . _ n 8 50 ti i Oz o49 i 6i1 3 3 w 9g3 43 Nl3 39 \ t \2�t3 c L l3S 170 / 9$ y�� r �0 2S I 2 s'#z°y9 \ q9q �£� l0 ; \� N La sS pMp O PLAT 2OOR00 o\5q 4s g££ ��O Q ioo ` P r 2Ne �� 20 0£Spll �, f�, G I p Y" P 0—t2L.�iOt7RQ►LN P{+� FOR ,v �v\ 6 4 3 2 'n LOT I X fR?��: /000} *<.ISI.OS 4 5 2 a 5 y% 3 > — 4 BLOCK I 19 IB I IT 116 �J • -... - '�9 �: • G 0 V �[ss-D $- 9��a y ° 3�tll LOT 969.60 MEA -S. �.1 ,� N I / F 9700C, - R90j5 11 •"N BLOCK I 141.00 N N i r 3� z9h 2 4 35 ^p . (r\�• v 7 S Y /o ii /Z /3 /4 /5 /G 24 zs zc 27 ze /7 /8 /9 zo •2/ 22 z3 OF OE ayp3 /iot/ /moo tS7.9 .SES 37 _ `0� — — — — t 411.05-- rso :r :::: •::::::::•:::::::: :::::•::: 014- 53 0 013-5 ..... HUNTER ` .►• :::: . :,.... :I ::::::::::::..... _ :•::::•:....... 222.05 189 to PART OF C J -\{ LOT 3 t I - - c —0`' BLUFF " J7 -1 44 +S sL 47 f/ 4JF S' a• sz s S4 S JL iT Sr S7 La L/ Llys oto -s3 ti • F,RT OFI Fater s i o:= • t 4• LOT 2 �OT I- tol t a�Y�e so MAR IFS AVE 'BILK AWE. VACA� I ION I City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF A STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights is the current record owner of a street right-of-way as described as follows; and Vacate the North 30 feet of Silk Avenue from the East line of Lot 11, Grandview Heights to the East line of Lot 30, Grandview Heights, lo- cated in Section 22, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota. Vacate the South 30 feet of Silk Avenue from the East line of Lot 44, Grandview Heights to the East line of Lot 63, Grandview Heights,located in Section 22, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota. . WHEREAS, a notice of hearing on said vacation has been duly published and posted more than two weeks before the date scheduled for the hearing on said vacation, all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said vacation on December 6, 1988, at 7:45 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall of the City of Mendota Heights; and WHEREAS, the City Council then proceeded to hear all persons interested in said vacation and all persons were afforded an opportunity to present their views and objections to the granting of said petition;and NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the vacation of the street right-of-way described above, sit- uated in the City of Mendota Heights, is in the best interest of the public and the City, and is not detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the community. 2. That the above described street right-of-way be and the same is hereby vacated. 3. That the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and present to the proper Dakota County officials a notice of completion of these vacation proceedings, all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 7th day of December, 1988. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 30, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City *or�or FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: South Ridge Business Center Phases II and III Case No. 88-42 DISCUSSION: At their November meeting the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider a request from United Properties for a conditional use permit for a planned unit development and preliminary plat for Southridge Business Center Phases II and III (see attached staff memos). It had been mentioned in the staff reports that 601 wide parking lots are a minimal design standard. At the hearing it was determined that 60 foot wide parking lots had been allowed before within the development and that they were functioning well. It was therefore recommended to allow 60, wide parking lot within this phase also. It was also determined that there are some existing mature trees on the site and thatefforts should be made to save as many as possible. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and conditional use permit for a planned unit development for Southridge Business Center Phases II and III. The planned unit develop- ment approval provides for a 20 foot front yard sign setback variance, four parking stalls per 1000 square feet of office space and an 81 61, parking stall width. ACTION REQUIRED: Council needs to conduct the required public hearing to consider a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for the.Southridge Business Center Phases II and II and then if they desire to implement the Planning Commission recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 88- 1 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SOUTH RIDGE BUSINESS CENTER PHASES II AND III. City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SOUTH RIDGE BUSINESS CENTER PHASES II AND III WHEREAS, United Properties Development Company has requested a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for South Ridge Business Center Phases II and III; and WHEREAS, both the Planning Commission and City Council have conducted the required public hearings to consider said application; and WHEREAS, both the Planning Commission and City Council approve of said planned unit development. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights herewith grants a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for South Ridge Business Center and approve of the preliminary plat as shown on the drawings dated October 22, 1988, to include a 20 foot front yard sign setback variance, four parking stalisfor 1000 square feet of office space and an 8' 61t parking stall width. Adopted by'the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 6th day of December, 1988. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DO ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor N CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director November 14, 1988 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development Southridge Business Center Case No. 88-42 DISCUSSION: United Properties has now fully rented Southridge Phase I and is looking to begin Phases II and III. The design for these new phases will be identical to Phase I, see attached letter and drawings from United Proper- ties that describe their application. Along with the planned unit develop- ment, United Properties is also asking for variances from the City's zoning ordinances as follows: A. 20' Si n Setback - This setback has been the established setback throughout the park for United's signs and the City is looking toward modifying the Zoning Ordinance to allow this setback when the Ordinance is updated in the near future. B. 4 Cars 1000 Square Ft. of Office Area Parking Ratio - The City has allowed United Properties to use this ratio in the past and our experience has been that this ratio is an acceptable level for the United Properties developments. C. 816" Parking Stall Width - Again, the City has allowed United Properties to use this parking stall width previously and there have been no problems. The overall lot width on United Proper- ties' past parking lots has been 65 feet. The 60 feet shown on this site plan is a minimal acceptable width and could be a pro- blem in winter if snow is not cleared away well. Grading plans have not yet been developed, however previous grading plans for other phases have had interior storm water drains in the parking lots. Storm water drainage is a problem in the industrial park and staff feels it is necessary to require that interior parking lot drains be in- stalled on this site with some "on site" storage capacity. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct a public hearing and based on Commission and public comments make a recommendation to the City Council on a preliminary plat and condi- tional use permit for a planned unit development (the variances requested are considered as a part of the planned unit development approval). UNITED PkOPERTIES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY October 31, 1988 Ms. Mary Ann DeLaRosa Deputy City Clerk City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 RE: Southridge Business Center Phase II & III Mendota Heights Business Park Dear Mary Ann: United Properties Development Company requests the approval of the City of Mendota Heights for a conditional use permit - P.U.D., preliminary plat approval and authorization for a building permit subject to staff approval for Southridge Business Center Phases II & III. As requested, we have included, herewith, 15 reduced copies of the site plan, a preliminary landscape plan and the grading plan for the referenced projects. Also included is our application for consideration of planning requests, a $500 application fee, and an abstractor's certificate naming owners within 350 feet of the subject property. Phase II and III of Southridge Business Center will be located on approximately a 4.25 acre site at the southeast corner of Pilot Knob Road and Enterprise Drive. The architectural design of these buildings will mirror exactly the design of the existing Phase I building at 1355 Mendota Heights Road. As with the Phase I building, Phase II and III will incorporate the very handsome dark Sienna brick accented by an 811 wide polished stainless steel accent band and black glass. The Phase II building will consist of approximately 28,900 square feet of building area, and Phase III will eventually contain approximately 21,158 square feet. It is our strategy to build these two phases separately. Eventually they will share a common wall and will take on an appearance of a single building. We used this same strategy with Phase I and II of the existing Mendota Heights Business Center project at Pilot Knob Road and Northland Drive. We anticipate starting construction on the Phase III building when the Phase II building is substantially leased. We anticipate an office/warehouse mix of 60%/40% respectively for both Phase II and III. 3500 West 80111 Street Suite100 Minneapolis, MN55431 (612)831-1000 Na As part of our submission, we request the following variances: 1. A 201 project signage setback. 2. A 4/1,000 s.f. of office area parking ratio for purposes of calculating the number of needed parking spaces. 3. An 81 6" parking stall width. We have indicated the project sign locations on the enclosed site plan. The signage design is consistent with the standards that we have established for the business park. The design duplicates the signage that we have used on all of the one story buildings throughout the business park including Southridge Business Center Phase I. The 20-1 setback variance has been granted to us previously on the Mendota HeightsBusiness Center project. The sign will be positioned so that it will not impair traffic visibility. Both requests for the reduced office parking ratio of 4/1,000 s.f. and the reduced stall width at 81 611 have been approved by you for our Mendota Heights Business Center project, Northland Insurance Company building and Southridge Business Center Phase I buildings. Our experience at all of these referenced projects is that the parking is very adequate to serve the needs of the tenants in those buildings. In fact, we have a significant amount of excess parking available at Southridge I and Mendota Heights Business Center which are similar type properties. Each of those projects are fully occupied. The primary reason for the request is to maximize the landscaping on the site in lieu of unnecessary parking surfaces. Our current site plan proposes five phases of Southridge Business Center. The actual sizes and configurations of Phases IV and V are subject to change as market conditions dictate. Like Mendota Heights Business Center, we hope to achieve similar benefits from the P.U.D. zoning that allow for common lot lines, shared parking, site access and circulation. We respectfully request your approval of these requests. Sincerely, Dale J Gloec wa c Vice P esident DJG/jas CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director November 14, 1988 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development Southridge Business Center Case No. 88-42 DISCUSSION: United Properties has now fully rented Southridge Phase I and is looking to begin Phases II and III. The design for these new phases will be identical to Phase I, see attached letter and drawings from United Proper- ties that describe their application. Along with the planned unit develop- ment, United Properties is also asking for variances from the City's zoning ordinances as follows: A. 20' Sim Setback - This setback has been the established setback throughout the park for United's signs and the City is looking toward modifying the Zoning Ordinance to allow this setback when the Ordinance is updated in the near future. B. A Cars/1000 Square Ft. of Office Area Parkin& Ratio - The City has allowed United Properties to use this ratio in the past and our experience has been that this ratio is an acceptable level for the United Properties developments. C. 816" Parking Stall Width - Again, the City has allowed United Properties to use this parking stall width previously and there have been no problems. The overall lot width on United Proper- ties' past parking lots has been 65 feet. The 60 feet shown on this site plan is a minimal acceptable width and could be a pro- blem in winter if snow is not cleared away well. Grading plans have not yet been developed, however previous grading plans for other phases have had interior storm water drains in the parking lots. Storm water drainage is a problem in the industrial park and staff feels it is necessary to require that interior parking lot drains be in- stalled on this site with some "on site" storage capacity. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct a public hearing and based on Commission and public comments make a recommendation to the City Council on a preliminary plat and condi- tional use permit for a planned unit development (the variances requested are considered as a part of the planned unit development approval). 7 REVISED CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PRE -COUNCIL MEETING - 6:45 P.M. SMALL CONFERENCE ROOM 1. City Administrator Evaluation. 2. Adjourn to Regular Meeting. ------------------------------------------------------------- AGENDA DECEMBER 6, 1988 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. �: Y 2. Roll Call. -- 3 . Agenda Adoption. — 4. Approval of Minutes of October 18.�j G� 5. Consent Calendar: --14 a. Acknowledgement of October Park Minutes. b. Approval of Resolution No. 88-91, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 11," FOR COMMERCIAL STREET LIGHTING. C. Acknowledgement of November Planning Commission Minutes. d -Authorization for Execution of Kensington Private Watermain Agreement. e,Acknowledgement of November Code Enforcement Report. f. Approval of Resolution NO. 88-92, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 85, PROJECT NO. 311. g. Approval of the List of Licenses. h. Approval of List of Claims. \** i. Adoption of Delinquent Sewer Resolution No. 88-93. End of Consent Calendar. Introductions. ^"`\ Council Resolution Regarding School District 197 ��',• Excess Levy Referendum. (Resolution No. 88-94). (Representative Will Be Pre n) 5� J ,lic Comm ')nse to Public Comments. D G�- i1 9. Bid Award and Public Hearings: a. Kuross Street Vacation Hearing (Silk Avenue). 7:45 (Re'solution Np. 88-95). 79 b. Case N68-42, United Pro3erties, i . 8tional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, Preliminary Plat, afiances. /4 V aF8*00 P.M. (Resolution No. 88- 96). c. Case Nd. 88-47, U.S. West, Conditional Use Permit, and Wetlands Permit 8,15 P M (Resolutio No 88- 97) 10. Unfinished and New Business. a. Case No. 88-46, Hair, Lot Split. "'- f b. Case No. 88-40 Colon. Subdivision. c. S reet Light Discussion. (Continued )from November 15 meeti IA- . — - r-�- 14-1w - . +-.= ant. . d. Appolytme f dmin';rtr-r-A-Ive Assis ant. 01 4d e. ApApintm t Ci �1 Ken ;1, Park Committee. f.��chase of Furniture. h4a g. D* on 9f L *ngt 1 0 XVIT 31114r ��p j ect. h. CDBG �'a7 A at, 70n Y.- 61- ^JU Council Comm nts Adjourn. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 30, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: VW Bell Conditional Use Permit and Wetlands Permit Case No. 88-47 E At their November meeting the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider a conditional use permit for an essential service struc- ture and a wetlands permit within the Kensington development (see attached staff memos). RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the requests. ACTION REQUIRED: Council needs to conduct the required public hearing and then if Coun- cil desires to implement the Planning Commission recommendation they need to pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 88- RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND WETLANDS PERMIT TO ALLOW NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY TO CONSTRUCTION AN ESSENTIAL SERVICE BUILDING ON OUTLOT B, KENSINGTON PUD. ("14'-44 q� fiphabta i!eiggts 44�LUTIPO N6; 6,j_'*** RESOLUTION APPROVING A qNbifeloki 4 F fill, ANT, D �VJIETLA INDS PERMIT TO ALLOW NORTHiESTERIT q E 0 CONSTRUCIT' AN ESSENTIAL SERVICE IWT If BUIDOQ a OUTY E�;i�ITQN PbD. WHEREAS, Northwestern Rall T@Iephbne d4'6'aiiy ttas made application for a conditional use parm-'t t -'a U111c ung bp Qutlot B, Kensington PUD for the purpose of hoqoi.4� ;i6�strdhlq eqviipmplit assoc4atod- ' state- of-the-art fiber -to homd*tP�� rid WHEREAS, the structue Lb to by with: h 06 feet of a uetl'ands thus requiring ,that a wetiand,!s, per�jit bA gr.knted and WHEREAS, the City of aonduat;s6 this requirpd,public_ hearings At both the P16n_r;! r14 -:City ��,pjAnci 4 and- WHERrXSI there have �bqn n6'0p�erjt'reE[9bn hrought forward'for not allowifig the structure.:. NOW HEREFORE13E i .71P flf-8OLV�D. lhLt the Uty pf -t4end6ta Heights approve a Conditional use permit aP4 wet;,ande'per�lt Northwestern Bell Telephone!Company to co4ptru--t an opE,Vtial oprvioa,--buildina oliOutlot B, kensingtoa. PUD. Adopted by the City. 30-wOil'or thp 6 y, Cit of M'endota'jj. �ights thit'3 6th day of December,. 1988. CIjY COUNQUp I - CITY OF M_EXD,,';TA HEI-AH.T03 . i 11Y - ___ . 4- Charles. B'. Meruensdtto, Mayor - ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson t W CITY.Of MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 14,- 1988 'N' 4111 N tV TO: Planning _06bmdps.iqw, FROM: James E. Danielson Pub1li ir�, c-, Works Dptor SUBJECT..: &.U8- Optics Building, Keifsington' Case No . 884_4 L. ;-'`,,.it., 't , .. -47 1 t!* -1 , DISCUSSION: _z, �.t4 T_ fft US West proposes to utilize It dt6Lt& of the!artyl -If f-b6r-optiVs telephone service;forthe-Kensington Planned,,UnitrDevelopment. In-,.order,to do this they need to6nstruct,a`small eqi�ipment,building on Outlot"B with!Wiihe IC — _ 1 -.1 1.1-, . I ' - development -(see attached location drawin'g').—US Westf ha's'Ib'e'e*rf''workfng,!with` Centex -Hotel .to,-,design,�,and locate,the building. The building has been - '; - * wp- - 4 .. t - designed to match" architecture o� t�e'K��singto��a'nor.,H"O"mes;,,.(oe'e',,a -4: taclied drawings and letter of explanation). ,' en The )prop,o,s.ed,- building `is an-essential`essential I. s er-,v ic erf.�6t_r ucturt�uare'' al -lowed within the' 11 __" 'R"'a .' district with' 'service structufe�-d-nd-'es &onditioh-al e d use permit. Th lding is also -located within 26 t6et`'6k,`d i4tr6n s. an, needs to have a wetlands permit approved. US West has adjustedAthe!'*-,(Kiiig di7ourf& thol; biji.-Iding, js o.ithat they, will not .need to fill or disturb the area - surrounding the pond. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct,�,,',�Yi'e'*;'�i'equired-publi.c hearing to consider a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a telephone equipment building on Outlot B, Kensington Planned Unit Development and to consider a wetlands permit to -allow,construction to be within 26 feet of a wetlands. IF, U S WEST Business Resources, Inc. r Real Estate Department 100 South 5th Street, Suite 1040 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 �� E5rff November 8, 1988 City Engineering Attn: Jim Danielson 750 S. Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mayor, Council and Planning Commission: Northwestern Bell/US WEST has submitted a site plan to obtain a conditional use permit to build a telephone equipment switching building in the City of Mendota Heights. We have complied with the request to redesign the site to not disturb the contours and drainage area surrounding the pond. Our new plan reflects our efforts to minimize the impact on the pond. The building size is 18 by 32 feet, and the telephone facility will house electronic equipment associated with fiber to home with a field trial at the Kensington Park Project. This will be the first application of this technology in the 14 -state US WEST territory. Mendota Heights was selected after looking at several other surrounding areas. It is intended to be a showcase, state-of-the-art telecommunications system. The fiber -to -home feature will initially provide basic telephone service and four lines per home. In the future the fibers greater transport capacity or bandwith will lead to the realization of an all-digital network. This will allow customers to send and receive voice data and video simultaneously over the phone line. Much of the future use of this type of technology will depend on the success of its application within your City. This project is very important to us and we are asking for a favorable response from you, the City. This would be reflected in your support of our decision and financial investment for selecting you as the pilot City for this program. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, enneth L. Dallman Assistant Manager -Real Estate e PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: 22 November 1988 88-47 Northwestern Bell Mendota Heights Road (see sketch) Conditional Use Permit 1. Northwestern Bell is proposing to build a telephone switching station building on a small parcel south of Mendota Heights Road. Earlier they had approached City staff suggesting placement of the building at the intersection of Mendota Heights Road and Dodd Road. The applicants were advised that this would not be appropriate, therefore, they have revised their proposal to show placement further to the east. 2. The building is designed to reflect the character of the architecture of the surrounding future residential buildings in the Centex development. It appears to be tastefully designed and will be constructed of brick over concrete block, with a shingled hip roof. 3. Accurate base mapping was not provided for the proposed site indicating the existing conditions, but it appears that there is no significant tree growth where the building will be placed. 4. Because it is next to a natural ponding area, the building itself and construction practices should disrupt the site as little as possible. The sloping rear yard down to the pond should be carefully constructed to minimize runoff and should be sodded and staked, or seeded and covered with landscaping fabric. The remainder of the ground cover on site should be installed to prevent erosion and runoff. 5. . The site plan indicates various types of landscaping around the building. For the plant materials it would be desirable to have overstory trees of 2-1/2" caliper minimum, coniferous trees d feet minimum height, and foundation shrubs 5 gallon pot minimum. HAZEL , UBJEC PROPERTY THE CONVENT A ACADEMY - I Of TM insiTAT10H 4► A. Gods sCNDOI i I+� ROAD J T. ROAD MENDOTA -- -- r— �� C CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS WM November 30, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City -,�i 9srAor FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Hair Lot Division Case No. 88-46 DISCUSSION: At their November meeting the Planning Commission reviewed a request from Mr. Doug Hair to subdivide his lot (see attached staff memos). RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend waiving the public hearing and approving the lot division. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the Planning Commission recommendation they should pass a motion waiving the public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 88- t RESOLUTION APROVING A LOT DIVISION IN THE LINDEN ADDITION PLAT. I I t City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 88 - WHEREAS, Mr. Douglas E. Hair, owner of Lot 18, Linden Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota, has requested from the City to divide off a portion of that lot and have it connected to Lot 19, Linden Addition, said new lots being described as follows: Parcel A - Lot 19 less the east 35.00 feet and the west 30-00 feet of the east 65-00 feet of the north 50-00 feet, Linden Addi- tion. Parcel B - Lot 18 together with the east 35-00 feet and the west 30-00 feet of the east 65.00 foot of the north 50-00 feet of Lot 19, Linden Addition. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, that the lot division submitted at this meeting be that same is hereby approved. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 6th day of December, 1988., ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Hair Lot Division Case No. 88-46 nTqrTTqqTnV- November 14, 1988 Mr. Doug Hair, 2301 Swan Drive, is just finishing constructing his new home and is preparing to get his permanent financing. Mr. Paul Maczkol is his new neighbor to the east on Cheri Lane and he has an easement over the east portion of Mr. Hair's property. Mr. Maczko would like to own the easement so that he might someday expand his garage (see attached drdwing for the location of the proposed new lot lines). Mr. Hair is willing to transfer the property to Mr. Maczko but needs to do so rapidly so that he can finalize his home loan in the near future. Mr. Hair and Mr. Maczko both own platted lots and the proposed lot division will create two new lots that still meet all the City's minimum lot requirements. This lot subdivision can therefore be exempted from the public hearing requirement. ACTION REQUIRED: , Review the requested lot division and make a recommendation to the City Council on waiving the public hearing and approving the suddivision request. ft .... .. ? CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY,".,'MINNESOTA iE -d' ;41 IN APPLICATION' FORi4CONSIDERATION;;',' -4 C', -OF PLANNINGIREQUEST 4, filt'k-i 1.". np r Date e of'A lication'Oftobe 1 �44 ee.Paid .7 _17.3i ;j Applicant IN f1'Name:"` Hair Douglas E at First M r Initial it it,:! ".) 6 %V4_1 ij.;F ti I Ad pach A5.q r)]Number &, Street City Zip, State .,"i"Men(int i i qh Address; 2289 A S " n e treef Mn ),19 7, 41)Telephone Number: 454-3959% 4 V Owner it Name. 'Smith,' Ronald P.' Last First Initial 'Address:'2357 Swan Drive- 'Mendota Heights Mn 55120 7 ,Z) F%:;t Number & Street City State Zip Street*Location of Property in Question 0; It -14) Cheri Lane Legal, Description of Property: "Lot"18, Linden Addition a4, Type,of.Request : Rezoning -Variance Conditions l`Use Permit*" Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. "Minor,Conditional. Use P 41+ Permit`'. 7 it xx -r 7 "'Plan' Approval Wetlands Permit.` Other Ft tf;j! J.Ifr! "n' d 4i'60'%bt e" s' t T 1§11^equest involves `a Lot 'spl The I D'I`il� of f i He a 14-A 11 feet6f the 1AA AZ -F -A 4-1,,- r- -P 4- L, Pit )arcel sha i 1 be*trans�errPA"t'n Mr, he, tlij 'Y", 4 p:lAdditt6n.' J6 Case No. ft .... .. ? CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY,".,'MINNESOTA iE -d' ;41 IN APPLICATION' FORi4CONSIDERATION;;',' -4 C', -OF PLANNINGIREQUEST 4, filt'k-i 1.". np r Date e of'A lication'Oftobe 1 �44 ee.Paid .7 _17.3i ;j Applicant IN f1'Name:"` Hair Douglas E at First M r Initial it it,:! ".) 6 %V4_1 ij.;F ti I Ad pach A5.q r)]Number &, Street City Zip, State .,"i"Men(int i i qh Address; 2289 A S " n e treef Mn ),19 7, 41)Telephone Number: 454-3959% 4 V Owner it Name. 'Smith,' Ronald P.' Last First Initial 'Address:'2357 Swan Drive- 'Mendota Heights Mn 55120 7 ,Z) F%:;t Number & Street City State Zip Street*Location of Property in Question 0; It -14) Cheri Lane Legal, Description of Property: "Lot"18, Linden Addition a4, Type,of.Request : Rezoning -Variance Conditions l`Use Permit*" Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. "Minor,Conditional. Use P 41+ Permit`'. 7 it xx -r 7 "'Plan' Approval Wetlands Permit.` Other Ft tf;j! J.Ifr! "n' d 4i'60'%bt e" s' t T 1§11^equest involves `a Lot 'spl The I D'I`il� of f i He a 14-A 11 feet6f the 1AA AZ -F -A 4-1,,- r- -P 4- L, Pit MU W� I'm )arcel sha i 1 be*trans�errPA"t'n Mr, he, tlij 'Y", 4 p:lAdditt6n.' J6 rA MU W� I'm N A D i T—i k befeby reffity that this !,l#'V, if, or moil N,15 p(cpated 1'} file (it U11,11'r illy alrect -stiper: • VISIL)-1 wid M-1 I om a (J'.;Y 11. Laild" Scal PAUL R. McLAGAN a SON, th - :z li. ,,t-Mviie. 0 in, Reg. Land Surveyors. Date 111-119--7,r Reg. NO. r- p 1011717.7 Pxa-v —z:r-AL '41D /vz--w (2301 -5w'q"•4 /07- /9. ZoC47-10AI VV6-7-1-41V2)--'r 7- . .... .... 672— E 'p Of V fj PLANNING REPORT DATE: 22 November 1988 CASE NL/K4BEFl: 88-46 APPLICANT: Douglas E. ||o)r LOCATION: North Side of Cheri Lane at Swan []rive (ooe sketch) ACTlCJK1 REQUESTED: Subdivision Approval ' PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: l. The action requested involves Lots 18 and 19 of the Linden Addition, on the aomt o)do of Roger's Lake. The proposal is to add a portion of Lot 1B, which is quite 1argm' to Lot Ig for purposes of accommodating a future garage addition on Lot .19. The application contains a typographical error referring to Lot 17, which is to the north, - instead of the correct parcel, Lot 19, which is to the east of Lot 18. ' 3. The parcsd to be split off of Lot 18 and added to Lot 19 is 35 feet wide at the street, widening to 65 feet at the bock of the lot. Both lots would still meet nnin}nnurn lot size requirements after the split. W A I of i MENDAKOTA GOLF COURSE a C UNTRY CLUB (PRIVATE) WA NORTHEMN STATIES ER P07" SUB -STATION IN LOTS 18 & 19 SUBJECT PROPERTY ►�I111 milllllll� Boil VIII � �' ANN Ill. Xv NORTH SCALE 101=800. 44.42 74— INV ?063E10 b jo NJ w.- 22 in J66 .23 C50.12 IIS M.0 . I a lcamwor, 0,1 0 + To aNo C 06 ti rao."s 010-03 XW .93.. A8t4e36'C Z 12 7'-11.44.. 20 000 2 13 27iii 39130 je •2�' ?42.58 80 19 0 pl°iD . a .... FO 274:?i. '24 7.4 040 14 .0 0 0 0 Q 1 .06 N Lm�.yft r N BSN'51'E 2E 4.6_3_ h se 38.00 NW14'46'W L .20.00 144.63 110.00 166.77 141 3: z cl rz 10: _0 16 17 ebb b2O-O22 9"Zwlol 020-03 426.09 z m 166.2130 20.00 x 124.15 t54 87 30;30 WAGON 110.00 MH E EL Co. RD 2 140. 16.) 141 M SoilG br 0 y PRO POSED PROPERTY fez ADDED TO LOT 19 WIV7. A/ WeI12- 711.4 686.7 6LB.6 8 A/7 rj It / % AlIVIr Le t Z /5F 2-2 Z3 24 ZZ O lap s M M 2561 33 3261 as 9t --- -GHE—R F—"` il "Z 11L .10 flz &I o_11Z al oft i. to' 3 5 6 7 Ro g e rt' --d -e 27 26 hj 25 24 23 22 21 3 155,44- //f flz I't 11 IZ AN 41 /740 170 p Iz Z I'd Is 70 170 17 /740 170 p Iz Z I'd Is 70 170 40 77 0 z 0 NORTH -SCALE V=200' 1.0 170 L z ff, 4 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 30, 1988 T0: Mayor, City Council and City nA4' r FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Colon Subdivision Case No. 88-40 nTSrttRRMN The Planning Commission conducted public hearings at their October and November meetings to consider a request from Mr. Vern Colon to subdivide a parcel of land located in the north end of the City (see attached staff memos). The central issue at the hearing was the road layout, no one wanted a through street from Hiawatha and Miriam to Trunk Highway 13 but some now wanted the cul-de-sac to come from the existing neighborhood versus from Trunk Highway 13. The neighbors were all opposed to connecting Miriam and Hiawatha (see attached petitions). At the hearing there was also there was some discussion on vacating Eugenia Street and its connecting alley. The Planning Commission decided that it was not an issue before them on whether or not to vacate the right- of-ways and made no recommendation. Since the hearing, the City received the attached two letters opposed to the vacations. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted 4-3 to recommend approval of the subdivi- sion as proposed, with the Miriam/Hiawatha connection and with a trail/utility easement provided between Lots 4 and 5 to allow for pedestrian access between the two neighborhoods. Anderson and McMonigal voted against the motion because they desire the cul-de-sac to be constructed off the Miriam/Hiawatha connection and Dwyer voted against the motion because he supports the neighbors desires not to connect Hiawatha and Miriam. ACTION REQUIRED: Review the request and if Council desires to implement the Planning Commission recommendation they should pass a motion approving the prelimin- ary plat with the condition that Hiawatha and Miriam be connected and a 20' utility easement and 10' trail easement be dedicated between Lots 4 and 5. If those petitioning for the vacation of Eugenia Avenue and the alley between Highway 13 and Pierce wish to continue their request, an application should be filed and the $250 fee paid. Staff will set a public hearing so that Council may formally consider the request. I 9 All AL -f4, _ ,iii..' %'' �� 1.�i/ //��L�/ / E �Mlvlj Mel WE W, I/%/: dI M Richard Heidenreich 598 Sibley Hwy. — — Saint Paul, MN 55188 I CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Colon Subdivision Request DISCUSSION: November 16, 1988 At their October meeting the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider a request from Mr. Vern Colon to subdivide a 5.6 acre parcel of land located between Miriam Street and Trunk Highway 13. During the hearing the following questions were raised; what should be the future of Eugenia Street and its connecting alley, why is Miriam Street shown as only a 30 foot wide right-of-way on the preliminary plat, is the street layout as proposed. by Mr. Colon acceptable and finally, staff was asked to begin an engineering feasibility study to address handling the storm water and the street layout. The hearing was continued to the November meeting to allow staff time,to'respond to these questions. EUGENIA STREET Eugenia Street is an undeveloped 30 foot wide street right-of-way located on the north side of the plat. The abutting neighbors, Ms. Jan Peyer and Mr. Wayne Schwantz recently petitioned the City Council to have Eugenia Street vacated, the vacation was denied based on two factors, Eugenia Street has been used as a pathway (should that pathway be continued) and would Eugenia Street be needed as a roadway or pathway when Mr. Colon developed his vacant property to the south. Staff feels that Eugenia Street could now be vacated provided a utility easement is retained for the existing overhead utility lines. A path easement could also be retained if it is determined that a path is needed. Should Eugenia Street not be vacated, it will cause problems for the new lot owners on the north side of the cul- de-sac. These lots will be "through lots", lots that have street front- age on both their front and back yards. Through lots require conditional use permits for any construction in their back yards. (See attached petition from neighbors to vacate Eugenia Street. If the City decides to allow Eugenia to be vacated a $250 application fee should be paid by benefitting neighbors. ALLEY There is an existing 20 foot wide alley platted between Eugenia Street and Garden Lane. The alley presently has overhead utility lines running its full length and is being used for access by several of the neighbors on the north. It appears as if the alley would be better left as it is and not be vacated. (See attached petition from neighbors to vacate alley again should the City decide to allow the vacation, a $250 application fee should be paid by benefitting neighbors). MIRIAM STREET Miriam Street right-of-way is shown on the preliminary plat as being only 30 feet wide. I checked the City's engineering records and can not find out exactly when the north 30 feet was acquired, however upon reviewing the legal description for the two parcels of land involved, both indicate a 30 foot roadway easement on the south, so sometime (?) the City has acquired a full 60 feet of right-of-way for Miriam Street. STREET LAYOUT It is staff's opinion that Mr. Colon's land would best be served by constructing a cul-de-sac. The cul-de-sac could be extended either from the west off Trunk Highway 13 or from the east off Miriam and Hiawatha. Which ever way the cul-de-sac is constructed, staff recommends that Miriam Street and Hiawatha Avenue (Pierce Street) be connected. That connection could be accomplished if a 50 foot wide right-of-way is acquired from Mr. Colon's parcel. At the hearing the neighbors were asked to convey their desires to the Planning Commission on their recommended street layout for the project. Councilmember Witt received the attached petitions from Mr. Wayne Schwanz requesting that both Miriam Street and Hiawatha Avenue be kept as dead end streets. Storm Sewer Some of the area to the east of Mr. Colon's development drains through his property (see attached drawing). A storm water project will need to be developed to provide for constructing a storm system to carry the water through the Colon project.. A public hearing will need to be hdd to deter- mine the funding for the project. As can be seen by the attached drawing the affected neighbors have not been previously assessed for a storm water project. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct the continued public hearing on this project and based on input from the public and Commission make a recommendation to the City Council. — - aa&s"A, PLA -r LIMIT -.-5, MA vr-Aoj"F- Ar-eA, �A NOTA65455EP Nor 4sse.,��, NDf TH 1V`/ HILLS �UHD &DDlTlbH -' - Vern Colon. Flat- 0DITIONAL --qOgM V"IIJA65' EAST OF ?LXT APJACEWT--rD "Ir-IM'A 5r- NCY. lqm October 26, 1988 City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 Attention: City Council Regarding; The connection of Miriam Street to either State Trunk Highway 13 or Hiawatha Avenue. We the undersigned adjoining property owners do request that Miriam Street remain a dead end and that it will not be constructed to join either State Trunk Highway 13 or Hiawatha Avenue. Name: Address: �.,,e.e.k-rte--* a..`�..��-r..�o•L.v�, -.1 6-31 'i7'zI14l4m J yt Name: Page 2 Address: ,5zo SYS �i/�/��c 5i---- October 26, 1988 City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 Attention: City Council Regarding: The connection of Hiawatha Avenue to either State Trunk Highway 13 or Miriam Street. We the undersighed adjoining property owners do hereby request that Hiawatha Avenue remain a dead end street and that it will not be constructed to join either State Trunk Highway 13 or Miriam Street. Sincerely, Name: Ibn Addr6ss: Clio LGG 7 3 r. doe. Name: Address: WE r/ J Page 2 October 26, 1988 City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 Attention: City Council Regarding: Request for vacation on the alley which exists on Block 1 of Cherokee Park Heights. We the undersigned adjoining property owners do hereby request the City of Mendota Heights to vacate the existing alley in Block 1 of Cherokee Heights Park, from Carden Lane to Eugenia Avenue easement. We request that the vacation be unencumbered except for the customary ten(10) foot easement rights under or over the existing utilities. For reference see exhibit A. Sincerely, Name: Address: cz—'6•Q Sgt CV S' R r kA',VawkAzkAvk LN'L A/w/ /13 } DAKOTA COUNTY MnNll* y AUG.1924 SCALE 60' O .11;�h� i'%. .�nCVI.lipJ7!, , t'^ !, . ' .. , , '. '' � �•' ♦ 4 •' 7.4 ZI ,• .. msµ_ ��••ve' ••' ,:• .',sa. • +'+ .... f `-�, +'yam' ,y{n .. :.. I ~' 15 fo •,, ♦. .�� G .yam. CP 4 October 26, 1988 City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 Attention: City Council Regarding: Request for vacation of Eugenia Avenue We the undersigned adjoining property owners do hereby request the City of Mendota Heights to vacate Eugenia Avenue from Sibley Memorial Highway to its conclusion on the East side of Hiawatha Avenue. We request that the vacation be unencumbered, except for the customary ten foot easement rights, under or over existing utilities. For reference see exhibit A. Sincerely, Name; Address q'� W 13 ~ ~ - ' PLANNING REPORT . DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 25 October 1988 Vernon R. Colon Southeast of Trunk H8mhvnoy 13 and North of Downing Street (see sketch) Approval of Preliminary Plat l. The site was originally proposed about ten years ago as a townhouse PLD], but it was not approved by the City. About 1981, the site was approved for development in the form of a single-family preliminary plot consisting of twelve lots. Aoueou to the twelve lots was via a cul-de-sac off of Trunk Highway 13 and provision was made for the extension of Pierce Street and Gordon Street in the northeast corner of the site. 2. The current proposal is to develop the land for single-family purposes with a single-family plot of only ten lots, but with no provision for the extension of Pierce Street and Garden Street. The new plat features larger lots with widths of up to 120 feet of building frontage. However, the look of provision for the extension and connection of Pierce Street and Gordon Street is a serious deletion. 3. The State Legislature gives the City the right to control the development of land through the review and (ultimate approval or disapproval) of preliminary and final plats. The Ordinance states that as a part of this responsibility, the City will assure on orderly continuity of street patterns by connecting existing streets on contiguous properties previously platted. This is a classic case where that is necessary. Both Pierce Street and Garden Street were plotted as e part of the previously approved plats. Persons who have lived on and are served by these streets should 000urne that theme streets will ultimately be extended or terminated in an appropriately designed cul-de-sac. 4. Here, the applicant proposes to ignore the fact that the street mndota. His development is being oriented away from these streets toward a new cul-de-sac toward Trunk Highway 13. Obviously, the land could be readily development by the extension of these mbamto and e connection provided from this link through Trunk Highway 13. In this case, however, the applicant chooses to turn his back on the existing neighborhood. This may be his preferred choice, but it does not alleviate the obligation to complete the street system previously platted contiguous to his property. Vernon R. Colon, Case No. 88-40 Page 2 5. Therefore, we suggest that it would be appropriate to request that the applicant revise his subdivision so as to provide for the continuity of the existing street system done in the preliminary plat back in 1981. 6. A copy of the old plat is attached for your reference along with the applicant's proposed new plat. Subject to engineering requirements, we have no problem with the plat as submitted except for the lack of provision for right-of-way for the extension of Pierce Street and Garden Street. There may be some questions as to who should pay for the improvements on the street extensions in question, but there should be no question as to the responsibility for the dedication of the right-of-way being that of the applicant's. • � � _STT i�� l..l*N ..` 11, .... ,iii.:%s ::r•:,,,.:: ,,,.,,,,,,�.,,,,,,, •�e�i 1� �o O.o v • `'�� X13" IIIIUIIillll��. �` � 0 � Illlllllllllllllll�rr_��-�r•�►v d • . ,�` ;:IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � �a . yllllllllllllllilll.:ele/ NN • �- ■ as ti CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson and Public Works Director SUBJECT: Colon Subdivision North Ivy Hills Second Case No. 88-40 DISCUSSION: MEMO October 179 1988 Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer Addition Mr. Vernon Colon has met with staff and planner to discuss a proposed single family plat, "North Ivy Hills Second Addition". Mr. Colon has pre- viously been before the City on three occasions with proposals for the development of this land. Twice for a Planned Unit Development with town- houses and once for an' 11 lot single family plat. The Planned Unit Develop- ment applications were both opposed by the neighborhood and were denied by the City Council. The 11 lot single family application was approved by City Council but never finalized by Mr. Colon. The proposed plat now before Planning Commission contains 10 single family lots all of which meet or exceed the City's minimum requirement for single family lots. This subdivision has several engineering items to be addressed: 1. Miriam and Hiawatha (Pierce Street) are now dead end streets and staff feels that they should be connected to improve traffic circulation. Miriam is now a barricaded dead end street and Hiawatha a substandard cul-de-sac. We feel connecting these streets would improve snowplowing efficiency and public safety access to the neighborhood. Colon does not necessarily object to the City completing this street project however he expects to be compensated for the right-of-way that needs to be acquired from his project and not be charged for the street construction itself. 2. An additional 3-4 acres of land drains storm water"through Mr. Colons property. Mr. Colon expects that the city will complete a public improvement project that fairly distributes the storm water costs from his project to those abutting properties that drain their water through his land. 3. Subsequent to the approval of a preliminary plat Mr. Colon will need to petition the City for a feasibility study, that study will then address the above two issues and determine the alternate courses of action. A public hearing will be held including all people to be assessed for this work and after that hearing a final course of action will be determined. 3 4. Staff would also like to point out that because Eugenia Street, which borders this project on the northp has not been vacated, four new through lots will be created. These lots will require Conditional Use Permits for any accessory structures (eg. pools, fences) within the rear yard. 5. Mr. Colon proposes two islands within the street right-of-way. He states that he will create a home owner association that will be responsible for the maintenance of these islands. Also Mr. Colon will need to propose a street name to be approved by the City. 6. Mr. Colon will need to contribute $600 per lot to the park fund. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct the required public hearing addressing the preliminary plat and based on input from the Planning Commission and the public make a recommen- dation to the City Council. 4 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TO: Mayor, City Council and FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Street Lights INTRODUCTION: MEMO City i- ,a -4r November 28, 1988 The issue of street lighting was discussed by the City Council last meeting when a member of Centex Corporation, the developer of the Kensington Manor Homes was before Council requesting street lights. Street lights have been requested by several developers over the past few years and the City's policy has continued to be to not have residential street lights. As a result of last meetings discussion staff was asked again to look at a policy for residential street lights. DISCUSSION: In order for staff to proceed with a street light program we feel that several policy questions need to be answered by the City Council; type of lighting to be allowed; level of lighting and funding for lights, both installation costs and the on going costs of operation and maintenance. 1. Type of Lighting to be Allowed It seemed apparent to standard that is different committee be established to tee could either be compose several Council members, or supplier for the Industrial this committee could apprai travel to the Sterner facto to view samples. 2. Level of Lighting me that the City Council desires to have a light from the ordinary NSP lights. I suggest that a select the light standard desired. The commit - d of the entire City Council, a subcommittee of something else. In talking with the light Park lights, he suggested that one of the ways se themselves of what lighting is available is to ry (a light manufacturer in Winstead, Minnesota) The Council or this committee then needs to establish a level of lighting. The City could have a spacing guideline and then light the -City based on this spacing (eg. a guideline number of 240 feet was used in the Industrial Park, another common spacing interval is to have one every street intersection or finally each system could be designed based on the needs or desires of the neighborhood). There needs to be standards established for both neighborhood and thoroughfare lighting. N 3. Funding If the City is to allow street lights a method of funding will need to be established. Neighborhood Lighting - It is assumed that construction costs will be assessed to the benefitted neighborhood and operation and maintenance costs will be billed on the affected neighborhood's utility bills. Thoroughfare Lighting - Currently the City's thoroughfares are illumi- nated to some degree by NSP lighting. These lights are there as result of citizen requests and other agency requirements. Should these lights be replaced by a City designed light those lights will need to be funded. Assuming we select a light comparable to the one used for the Industrial Park construction ' costs are estimated to run approximately $3000 per light. Some examples of costs (assuming we light intersections only) are: Thoroughfare No. of Lights Cost Dodd Road 30 $ 90,000 Marie Avenue 13 39,000 Lexington Avenue 13 39,000 Victoria Road 9 27,000 Wentworth/Wachtler 10 30,000 Mendota Heigfits�.Road 11 33,000 Huber Drive 8 24,000 SUB -TOTAL T2_82v000 Engineering & Overhead 85v000 TOTAL $367,000 Lexington Avenue, Victoria Road, Mendota Heights Road and Huber Drive are all MSA streets and MSA will participate in the cost of lighting intersections, however Dodd Road and Wentworth/Wachtler Avenues will need an alternate source of financing. It is suggested that costs for the remaining lights could be bonded for and paid for out of debt service; this would require voter approval in a referendum, which would be a good way to find out just how much value Mendota Heights residents place on lighting the arterial streets. ACTION REQUIRED: Give staff direction on the following questions: 1. Do we want to allow neighborhood residential street lighting? 2. Do we want to have a City standard for residential s.reet lighting? 3. How do we select a City standard light? — 1, 4. Do we want to have a City standard thoroughfare light? 5 ' . How do we select a City standard thoroughfare light? 6. What spacing to we want for thoroughfare lights? 7. How do we fund thoroughfare lights? MSA? Bonding? CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO DECEMBER 2, 1988 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D o —,City Administrator SUBJECT: Recommendation for Appointment of Administrative Assistant On November 28 and 29, we conducted the interviews of five candidates for the position of administrative assistant. The interview panel consisted of City Clerk Kathy Swanson, Public Works Director Jim Danielson, Council member Liz Witt, and me. Following the panel interview, the candidates went on a tour of the community with Engineering Technician Guy Kullander. Each candidate then returned for an informal follow-up interview with me only. The interview panel was pleased with the quality of the applicants. All were clearly qualified, and several had areas of special strength. After carefully screening and considering the applicants, I am recommending that Council appoint Kevin Batchelder, (not just on the basis of his first name!). A copy of Kevin's resume is attached for your review. As you can see, Kevin holds a Master of Arts degree in Public Affairs from the University of Minnesota. His primary concentration is in management, with a secondary emphasis in urban planning, which should serve us well given the types of assignments we envision for the assistant. He also has a Bachelor's Degree from Colorado State University with a major in political science. Kevin has served approximately one year of internship, 8 months with the City of St. Louis Park and the last four months with the City of Woodbury. He comes with high recommendations from both communities. Kevin was the unanimous first choice of the interview committee.. Interestingly enough, he was also the first choice of Guy Kullander after his tour of the community. Kevin seems to be an extremely perceptive person, and those with whom he has worked indicate that he is most capable in taking on an independent assignment and getting the work done right the first time through! At the writing of this memo, I have not had the opportunity to meet with Kevin to work out all of the details of his compensation package. However, based on our preliminary discussions, something in the advertised salary range is acceptable. I'will have a more definite recommendation for Council with the add-on agenda materials Tuesday evening. KDF:madlr attachment CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO NOVEMBER 28, 1988 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Fr, y Administrator SUBJECT: Appointment of Citizen's Park Committee At the December 6 meeting, Council is to appoint a 12 person committee whose purpose it will be to come up with a development plan for community parks. The Parks Commission has designated Carol Damberg, Bev Lachenmayer, and John Huber as its representatives. The Planning Commission has selected Michael Dwyer and Sandra Krebsbach. Council needs to select two of its own members to serve on the committee. It is also my understanding that each t council member is responsible for appointing one citizen representative. \ I would recommend that Council also appoint one of the members as Chair for the committee. Since the committee is being created by Council fiat, it would seem appropriate that one of the council representatives serve as Chair. However, I leave that to your discretion. ACTION REQUIRED 1. To select two city council members to serve on the committee. 2. For each council member to designate his/her citizen appointee to the committee. 3. To select a chairperson. KDF:madlr JOINT COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA, NOVEMBER 29, 1988 _ 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 1101 VICTORIA CURVE 1. Call to Order. —� 2 . Roll Call. — ar-( T ' 3. Approval of General and Me hanical for City Hall. Contractor Payments 4. Joint Council/Planning Commission Discussion of Proposed Redevelopment for Lexington/TH 110 Area. (See attached). a. Financial Issues -- b. Planning Issues 5. Adjourn. MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS November 25, 1988 To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevin Fraze��y Administrator Re: City Hall General and Mechanical Contractor Payments At the meeting of November 15th, Council declined to approve payment of the attached General and Mechanical contractor payments, until we had addressed some of the water problems evident around the new City Hall. As Council is aware, we have 30 days to make payment. By the time of our workshop Tuesday evening, the Mechanical payment will already be overdue; and General payment will be due prior to our December 6th meeting. Therefore, unless we have good reason to withhold the payments further, they should be approved on the 29th. Project manager Gene Lange and I met with the architect and general contractor on Tuesday afternoon. Following that meeting I sent the architect a letter outlining City concerns. My letter and his response are attached. The contractor feels strongly that the water problems are caused by design errors, i.e. not enough slope. As you can see, the architects are working on a gutter solution. GENERAL PAYMENT The architect recommends payment to the general contractor in the current amount due of $51,841.31; $68,562.00 of retainage and additional payments will still remain, and the architect feels this is sufficient to cover corrections. MECHANICAL PAYMENT The current mechanical payment due is $11,447.50. Staff knows of no significant problems with the mechanical system, so that the $14,220.35 of retainage should cover any corrections necessary before final acceptance. ARCHITECT'S FEES There is an additional $13,251 of compensation due to the Lindberg -Pierce under their contract; a current bill of $9,729.00 has been received. Staff is not seeking approval of that payment this evening. We will hold it until we are closer to a satisfactory resolution on the above discussed problems. I will be discussing Bob Pierce's letter with him early next week, seeking further clarification on who will be doing what and when. That information will be available to Council Tuesday evening,: nAAA City of Mendota Heights November 21, 1988 Mr. Robert Pierce Lindberg, Pierce Architect 15 South 5th street, #1200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Dear Bob: After occupying the new city hall, several areas of deficiency have been noted by City officials. These are beyond the minor items routinely to be expected on a punch list. They include: 1. The drainage problem into the exercise room in the basement from the front of the building. 2. The ponding of water in several spots near the front entry way. 3. The extension of the sidewalk edge on the west side of the front entry way, such that water from the roof drips directly onto the sidewalk. 4. The ponding in the driveway immediately outside the garage entrance on the lower level. Before authorizing any further payments, the City Council wishes to know that these items are being adequately addressed. We are aware that workmen are currently trying to solve the basement seepage problem. We also recognize that because of the time of the year, it may be difficult to do anything with the ponding problem on the sidewalk and in the rear driveway. However, we do request to know what corrections are anticipated when weather permits. Your very timely written response to these questions will be appreciated. Sincerely,. �..vinFrazell City Administrator ,cc: Joe Wagner, Joseph Construction Company 1101 Victoria Curve -Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 452.1850 Lindberg Pierce, Inc. Architects Suite 1200 15 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 James H. Lindberg (612) 332-3339 Robert L. Pierce G` November 23, 1988 City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve St. Paul, MN, 55118 Attention: Mr. Kevin Frazell Regarding: City Hall Construction Concerns LP Comm. No. 87-10 Dear Mr. Frazell: This letter is in response to the City's concerns regarding the four items noted in your letter to our office of November 21, 1988, and personally relayed to us at our meeting in City Hall of November 22, 1988. Our office is also very anxious to solve the problems of water, penetrating the lower level walls and standing water. The leakage into the building appears to have been stopped by dampproofing the top block at the sidewalk and routing the water away. This is a portion of a permanent solution. As discussed with you, we are detailing a gutter system for collection of water at the junction of the canopy and main roof. This gutter will collect water from both the main roof and canopy roof and discharge it away from the walk and immediate landscaped area adjacent to the lower level wall. We believe this system will alleviate the build up of water next to the building and eliminate the water dripping on the walk at the front doors. This will also lessen the "bird baths" caused by water from the roof being discharged to the sidewalk. We should have this gutter system designed and priced by the end of next week (December 2, 1988). Some small bird baths in the concrete walk are inevitable given the nature of concrete. However, if after drying the front walks with the gutter we find depressions greater than normal tolerances, we will have these areas removed. Kevin Frazell November 23, 1988 Page 2 We have reviewed with the Contractor the bituminous drive area within which ponding occurs outside the Police garage, and, while it is difficult to ascertain the extent of the low area due to piled snow/ice, it was concluded that the low area can be raised by replacement of bituminous in the immediate area. We do not recommend pursuing the correction of this problem until spring.. Our firm does maintain a conservative approach to payment of funds to the Contractors (as evidenced by numerous reductions in amounts authorized by previous payment requests) and feel comfortable with the $68,562.00 remaining for completion of Joseph's work. We continue to recommend payment of Application No. 12 to Joseph Company. I want to assure you that we will continue to pursue, to the City's satisfaction, the speedy conclusion of the remaining work and any problems which may arise. sincerely, Robert L. Pierce RLP. lkt APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA DOCUMENT G702 TO (Owner): CITY OF MEwMOTA HEIGHTS 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 ATTENTION: PROJECT: New City Hall Building Lexington & State Pwy 110 Mendota Heights, MN CONTRACT FOR: Mechanical Construction APPLICATION NO: 10 FINAL PERIOD FROM: 10-01-88 TO: 10-31-88 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: PAGE ONE OF PAGES Distribution to: ❑ OWNER ® ARCHITECT ❑ CONTRACTOR CONTRACT DATE: November 10, 1987 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached. CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS in previous months by Owner TOTAL 810.00 2,850-00 Approved this Month Number Date Approved 3 4 5 -8$ b .L'b TOTALS Net change by Change Orders + The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Docu- ments, that all amounts have been paid by him for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. RACTOR: DOODY CHITECT'S CERTI INC. Zr Zoo-1�•0�� Date: 10-21-88 TE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site obser- vations and the data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that the Work has progressed to the point indicated; that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Docu- ments; and that the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. The present status of the account for this Contract is as follows: ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM ....................... $ 287, 447.00 C1-04fl0. 450 Net change by Change Orders ..................... $ -Z,e 5, 407. 410 CONTRACT SUM TO DATE ........................ $ -281'' vim. V° rT^7sQr�L4,09 TOTAL COMPLETED &STORED TO DATE ........... $ z8 (Column G on G703) RETAINAGE 5 % ......................... $---r�� or total in Column I on G703 TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE .................. $— �70r �S�.�c LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT ....... $ 258,739-15 CURRENT PAYMENT DUE ......................... $_ _14_T49M' <<lqy7•sc State of: Minnesota County of: Anoka Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Octobel-19 88 Notary Public: My Comm g Mires: BARt3A {iJ.R ___._.....nrw AMOUNTWaan 7„t t,0tnttitiOssiort E:xp1Fw_7-2,r4. ... $ lO (Attach expltnup,2yfrvddi�f�ers►kotA't mount applied for.) By: // I�/Date: I /1 This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. AIA DI ENT 6702 • APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT • APRIL 1978 EDIT AIAO • © 1978 THE At, AN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHIN_ .�N, D.C. 20006 G702 — 1978 CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMENT 6703 Pane 2 OF 2 AIA Document 6702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, APPLICATION NUMBER: 10 containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. APPLICATION DATE: 10-21-88 In tabulations below,amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. PERIOD TO: 10-31-88 Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: # 2878 -Mendota Heights City Hall Lindberg Pierce, Inc. Architects A B C D E F 6 H I ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED WORK COMPLETED MATERIALS TOTAL BALANCE RETAINAGE NO VALUE FROM PREVIOUS THIS PERIOD PRESENTLY COMPLETED % TO FINISH APPLICATION STORED AND STORED (6/C) (C-6) (D+EI (NOT IN TO DATE 5% D OR E) (D+E+F) 1. BOND 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 2,500.(KI 100.0% 0.00 125.00 2. 15010 -GENERAL PROVISIONS 2,361.00 2,361.00 0.00 0.00 2,361.00 100.0% 0.00 118.05 3. 15160 -AIR/WTR TEST/BALANCE 1,250.00 0.00 1,250.00 0.00 1,250.00 100.0% 0.00 62.50 4. 15180 -MECH SYS INSULATION 12,940.00 12,940.00 0.00 0.00 12,940.00 100.0% 0.00 647.00 5. 15400 -PLUMBING, MATERIAL 24,000.00 19,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 24,000.00 100.0% 0.00 1,200.00 6. 0, LABOR 20,000.00 18,200.00 11800.00 0.00 20,000.00 100.0% 0.00 1,000.00 7. 15400 -OUTSIDE UTILITIES 15,334.00 15,334.00 0.00 0.00 15,334.00 100.0% 0.00 766.70 B. 15480 -LAWN IRRIGATION SYS 6,362.00 6,362.00 0.00 0.00 6,362.00 100.0% 0.00 318.10 9. 15500 -AUTOMAT SPRINK. SYS 26,700.00 26,000.00 700.00 0.00 26,700.00 100.0% 0.00 1,335.00 10. 15700 -LIQUID HEAT TRANSFER - MATERIAL 28,000.00 28,000.00 0.00 0.00 28,000.00 100.0% 0.00 1,400.00 11. 15700 - - LABOR 14,000.00 13,200.00 800.00 0.00 14,000.00 100.0% 0.00 700.00 12. 15800 -AIR DISTRIBUTION - - MATERIAL 93,000.00 93,000.00 0.00 0.00 P;?Oos0 100.0% 0.00 4,650.00 13. 15800 - ' - LABOR 19,000.00 17, 500.00 500' (loco 4,0@: 0.00 -�Ig,-�Gft-O�iO@:OfE- 0.00 -95o w 9 14. 15850 -AUTOMAT TEMP CONTROL 22, 000.00 20, 000.00 4r009,60- I�1t 00 0.00 ar000r0A-100rA7�- 0.00 -I-IAA. e- ( O Z1,z�,oO 15. C.O. # 1 - TO OFFSET ITEM #7 (2,850.00) (2,850.00) 0.00 0.00 (2,850.00)100.0% 0.00 (142.50) 16. C.D. # 2 610.00 810.00 0.00 0.00 810.00 100.0% 0.00 40.50 -19:-�Br-li-5r 1�5, "w-- n ^^ 125 00 0.04. .-125 �-1�► ^_ _ Y --°r9� "` TOTALS 1847982:98• 272, 357.00 42r625-. * 0.00 0.00�4;z49r16� APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA DOCUMENT G702 PAGE ONE OF 4 PAGES PROJECT: NEW CITY HALL BUILDING (name, address) Lexington and State Highway 110 Mendota Heights, MN. TO (Owner) City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Mn. 55120 ARCHITECT: Lindberg Pierce, Inc. ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: CONTRACTOR: The Joseph Company, Inc. CONTRACT FOR: New City Hall APPLICATION DATE: 11/3/88 APPLICATION NO: Twelve (12 ) ATTN: - PERIOD FROM: 10/1/88 TO 11/1/88 CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G702A, is attached. The present status of the account for this Contract is as follows: , Change Orders approved ADDITIONS $ DEDUCTIONS $ in previous months by Owner— TOTAL Subsequent Change Orders Number Approved (date) G-1 - 9,169.00 G-2,3 4,388.00 G-4 7,555.75 G-5 19,390.80 TOTALS + 22,165.55 oK Net change by- Change Orders $ State of: Minnesota County of: Mower The undersigned Contractor certifies that the Work covered by this Appli- cation for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by him for Work for which previous Certificq�tes for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner„and that the current payment shown herein is now due. Contractor: seph Company itC�C/ By: Osep ne Pres. Date: ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM ......................$ - 1,054,000.00 OV-- Net im Net change by Change Orders ...................$ 22,165:66- 55 CONTRACT SUM TO DATE ....................... $ 1,076,165.55 „6 o 1= , l,p(cp, TOTAL COMPLETED &STORED TO DATE ..........$ -• ---, 334-55 634.C;5 (Column G on G702A) RETAINAGE S % ......................... $ 53, 0 3l, l3 or as noted in Column I on G702A l., 007.,6OZ .82 TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE ..................$ �7 vc�c� /zvrsvc LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT ........ $ 955,761.51 K CURRENT PAYMENT DUE .........................$ "5z"�,-56fs:3� 51'��rJ X31 Subscribed and swom to before me th 3rd day of October , 19 88 Notary Public: My Commission expires: In acc rdance with the C�nt ct and this Application for Payment the Contractor is entitled to.payment in the amount shown above. ❑ OWNER Architect4N6, �/f jtJG. ❑ ARCHITECT ❑ CONTRACTOR By: 0This C i . It is gable only to the payee named herein and its issuance,--ment and acceptance are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contracts- -nder their Contrail. AIA DOC 7T G702 • APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT • MARCH 1971 ON • AIA® '0 1971 • IncAMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 173S NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHING,uN, D. C.20006 bWtMOTA HEIGHTS CITY HALL — — SCHEDULE OF VALUES CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMENT C702A PAGE OF PAGES AIA Document 6702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing CONTRACTOR'S signed Certification is attached. APPLICATION NUMBER: 12 In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED WORK COMPLETED STORED TOTAL COMPLETED AND BALANCE RETAINAGE Previous This No. VALUE MATERIALS STORED TO DATE TO FINISH A 8 C Applications Application F G(D+E+F) % H(C—G) I D E 01000 General Conditions 55,000. 53,027.00 -9:F5:ae oi, 54,000.00 11000. 02200 Earthwork 143,25II_OQ 143,250.00 1.43,250.00 ` 02411 Foundation DrainSyst: 2,000.0C 2,000.00 2,000.00 02513 Bituminous Paving 19,806..00 19,806.00 19,806.00 02710 Vinyl coated fencing 1,800. 1,800.00 1,800.00 02800 Landscaping 24,000.0 12,000.00 10,000.00 22,000.00 2,000. 02900 Seeding - 03300 Concrete & Reinf. 83.614.00 83,614.00 83,614.00 03430 Precast Concr. Plank 32,000.00 32,000.00 32,000.00 03450 Poured Gyp.Underlaymt 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 04220 Unit Masonry 185,400.00 185,400.00 185,400.00 04420 Cut Stone 05120 Structural Steel 38,200.00 38,200.00 38,200.00 05500 Metal Fabrications 12,400.00 12,400.00 12,400.00 06150 Prefab Wd. Trusses 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 06151 Prefab Wd. Beams 81000.00 8,000.00 2006 81000.00 06200 Carpentry 68,400.00 65,700.00 -21:79A:6A- 700 06400 Millwork 51,000.00 26,300.00 22,700.00 49,000.00 2,000. 07100 Concrete Deck Coating 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 .07150 Dampproofing 4,000.00 4,000.00 41000.00 07200 Bldg. Insulation 6,000.00 a.6,000.60: 6,000.00 07300 Wd. Shingle Roofing 27,000.00 7 0 21;888:88 7 p 21888:88 07640 Exterior Louvers _ 11800.00 07900 Caulking 1,600.00 800.00 800.00 1,600.00 " 8110 Stl. Frames & Doors 24,600.00 24,600.00 24,600.00 08120 Aluminum Door, side lite & Window Frmg. 17,000.00 17,000.00 17,000.00 08200 Wood Doors 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 08360 Overhead Garage Drs. 5,500.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 8450 C1g. Access Panel 450.00 450.00 450.00 08600 Clad Wood Windows 31,000.00 .31,000.00 31,000.00 SUB TOTAL OR TOTAL 867, 220.00 Au DON * CONTINUATION SHEET • MARCH 1971 EDITION • AIA® • - 0 THE AMERICARNWITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE,. N.W., WASHINGTON, D. G 1 9 K&UX TA HEIGHTS CITY HALL — — SCHEDtXZ OF VALUES - ONTINUATION SHE1eT AIA DOCUMENT C702A FAGS 2 of 2 PAGFs !A Document 6702, APPUCAMON AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing .ONTRACTOR'S signed Certification is attached APPUCATION NUMBER: tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Ise Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. ' ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: ITEM No. DESCRIPTION Of WORK SCHEDULED WORK COMPLETED STORED TOTAL, COMPLETED AND SALANCE RETAINAGE A R VALUE C Frevbns ADpi(Ddons This AppIkAdon MATERIALS F STORED TO DATE G(D+E+F) X TO FINISH H(C—Q I Brought Forward: 867,220.00 J 3700 Finish Hardware 61000. 5,500.00 5,500.00 500. 3800 Glass and Glazing 1,480.00 11480.00 1,480.00 9250 Metal Frmg.SGyp. Bd. 56,000.00 56,000.00 56,000.00 3330 Ceramic & Quarry Tile 14,000.00 14,000.00 14,000.00 9500 Acoustical Ceilings 12,000.00 8,200.00 3,800.00 12,000.00 9510 Fab -cover Acoust.Pnls 9650 Resilient Flooring 21,000.00 12,274.00 4,726.00 17,000.00 4,000. 9680 Carpet 9900 Finish Painting 24,000.00 20,100.00 20,100.00 3,900. 9950 Vinyl Wall Cover 0100 Porcelain Markerboar 800.00 680.00 120.00 800.00 0120 Display Cases 5,200.00 5,200.00 5,200.00 0180 Toilet Partitions 2,400.00 2,400.00 2,400.00 0190 Precast Shwr.Receptrs 700.00 700.00 700.00 0230 Disappearing Stairs •400.00 400.00 400.00 0350 Flagpole 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 4430 Cast letters a plaque4 500.00 500. 0440 Interior Plaque signs 11000.00 11000. 3450 Illuminated Ext -Sign 2,600.00 1 2,600. 0500 Metal Lockers 6,000.00 6,000. 0522 Fire Ext. & cabinets_ 500.00 440.00 60.00 500.00 0800 Toilet Accessories 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 0900 Coat Racks 300.00 300.00 300.00 .1380 Projection Screens 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 1830 Dishwasher 700.00 700.00 700.00 4200 Hydraulic Elevator ` l 24,000.00 23,500.00 23,500.00 500:• ` SUB TOTAL OR TOTAL MA DOCZIMDff • CONTINUATION SHEET a MARCH "n EDITION a* AIA 0-01% HE AJC UWAN IRNMJU OF ARCHIIicm Tm NEW YORK AVL, N.W, WASHINGTON. CL C. 2aoor CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMENT G702A PAGE 4 OF 4 PAGES AIA Document G702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing CONTRACTOR'S signed Certification is attached. APPLICATION NUMBER: 12 1 In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED WORK COMPLETED STORED TOTAL COMPLETED AND BALANCE RETAINAGE Previous This No. VALUE MATERIALS STORED TO DATE — TO FINISH A B C Applications ApplicEation F G(D+E+F) % H(C—Gl D Change order G-1 9,169.00 91169. Change order G-2 3,876.00 3,876.00 3,876.00 Change order G-3 512-00 512.00 512.00 Change order G-4 7,555-75 7,555.75' 7,555-75 Change order G-5 19,390-80 12,000.00 7,390.80 19,390.80 1 5(9.80 SUB TOTAL OR TOTAL 1,076,165.55 il 006,064.75 1,061,334.55 14,831. AIA DOCUN ;702A * CONTINUATION SHEET * MARCH 1971 EDITION 0 AIA(& * Q THE AMERICA, .4STITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE.. N.W., WASHINGTON, D. C. Lindberg Pierce, Inc. Suite 1200 15 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612) 332-3339 G? November 8, 1988 Architects James H. Lindberg Robert L. Pierce City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Attention: Mr. Gene Lange STATEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL / ENGINEERING SERVICES Account: New City Hall LP Comm. No. 87-10 Total Fee To Date: (.07% x $1,518,955 Construction Cost) Earned Compensation to Date as per Agreement Previously Billed and Received Amount Due This Statement Thank you $106,326.00 102,804.00 93,075.00 $ 9,729.00 7T H. 11%0 R� j/ I --l- EXiS'C 4Efd/IcE Iccvo J MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS November 25, 1988 To: Mayor, City Council, and Planning Commission From: Kevin FI*��ity Administrator Re: 110 exington Commercial Redevelopment Project INTRODUCTION The Council and Planning Commission will be meeting in workshop on Tuesday, November 29th to discuss the proposed commercial redevelopment of the southeast corner of the 110/Lexington Avenue. The purpose of this memo is to provide background material in preparation for that meeting. Financial issues will be discussed by the Council beginning at 7:00 p.m., and attendance by the Planning Commission is optional (but Commissioners are, of course, welcome). Beginning at 8:00 there will be a joint discussion of the land use and aesthetic issues involved. Attached you will find: 1. Letter of introduction from developer John Duffy, with attached site plan drawings. An alternative, labeled Alternative 1 is also provided in response to concerns raised at meetings with City staff. 2. For Planning Commissioners only, report from Maxfield Research Group on market viability of the proposed shopping center. (Councilmembers have previously received and discussed this report.) 3. More recent letter from Maxfield Group regarding signed and prospective leases for the center. 4. Memo from City Planner Howard Dahlgren regarding planning, land use, and aesthetic considerations for the project. 5. Relevant sections of the Mendota Heights Zoning Ordinance, including Districts B-2, B-3, B-4, and regulation of Motor Fuel Station/Convenience Store. T City staff, Planner Dahlgren, as well as representatives from Duffy Development, the Curley family, and Croix Oil will be present at the meeting Tuesday evening. The purpose of the meeting is to identify and discuss the major issues involved in accomplishing this project, and for Council to give general direction to the staff, developers, and Planning Commission. This is not a formal planning case at this point in time, so that we will not be trying to work out all of the fine points at this meeting. DISCUSSION OF FINANCIAL ISSUES The developer has proposed City tax increment assistance for acquisition and demolition of the existing S.O.S convenience store and the Curley Furniture Library. Attached is a memo from City Treasurer Larry Shaughnessy analyzing the cost of such assistance, along with a projection of payback from the new taxes generated by the redevelopment. If Larry's figures do not coincide exactly with those presented in Duffy's letter, it is because the breadth of the project has evolved somewhat throughout discussions with staff. A key issue is whether the redevelopment will include a restaurant site. All of the financial projections are tentative. Croix Oil is actively pursuing a friendly buy out of the S.O.S. store, and will hopefully have some additional information available on that Tuesday evening. Council has previously raised the question as to whether the City should simply provide the level of financial assistance requested by the developer or, in the alternative, some lesser contribution which would suffice to make the project financially viable. I have solicited a proposal from Springsted Financial Adviros to provide such an analysis. Springsted would actually work up a pro forma on the project, looking at expenses for development, as well as rent projections, etc. They would analyze the "bottom line" of how much public financial assistance is necessary to make the project have an acceptable rate of return to the investors, and would further indicate alternative ways that the City might -make that assistance available. This kind of analysis is beyond the capability of City staff, so Council will need to decide whether the information to be provided is worth the cost of bringing in an outside consultant. As of the writing of this memo the written proposal has not been received; I hope it will be available by Tuesday evening. PLANNING ISSUES The attached report from City Planner Howard Dahlgren lays out the planning and aesthetic concerns. Particular issues where the Council and Commission may wish to focus its discussion include: 1. The proposed access road. 2. Appropriate zoning, i.e. should the site be rezoned to an B-3, General Commercial District? 3. Amendment of the B-3 zone to permit motor fuel/convenience stores as'a conditional use. 4. Movement of the Business zoning district further south to the wall currently in place. 5. The setback variances required, both from the Residential District to the south, and from Highway 110. 6. The general aesthetic issues, i.e. location of the fuel station canopy. (Croix Oil will have a model of the proposed station at the meeting.) FY DEVELOPMENT 10850 Highway 55 Plymouth, Minnesota 55429 Ph. (612) 544-6769 Nov. 14,'88 Kevin Frazell City Manager City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota lie fights , MN 55118 Rei Lexington Plaza Shopping Center Dear Mr. Frazell, Spencer Beach Milford, Iowa 51531 Ph. (712) 337-3582 We are proposing a shopping center development for the south east corner of Lexington and Ilwy 110 (the Curley furniture store site). The project would include three structures - an L-shaped 32,000 s.f. retail center and a 3,900 s.f. convenience center to be built now; and a 4,200 s.f. free-standing building to be built when a suitable tenant in found. The proposal is described by the attached drawings and rendering. The convenience center is further defined by a model. A review of the proposal has been done by the Maxfield Research group. Financing The project is currently in a tax increment district. The council will be asked to approve both a land purchase and a development agreement. The city would purchase land and buildings from the Curley Furniture Library and SOS Convenience Center at the appraised values. The developer would agree, in advance, to purchase back any land not required for city or state use at its appraised value. We expect the net city* expenditure to be around $300,000. This would probably increase by 10%-15% if bonds are sold and another 10%-15% If the city assumes possible environmental problems.. Tax valuations will be set by the county. We have been told the taxes generated from the site will increase from $8,000/yr to $88,000/yr developed. Comments will be made by the staff as to the specific details and as to how conservative or speculative the developers proposed financing of the center may be. A development agreement would be drawn up spelling out the duties and performance guarantees of each party. We will have a sample agreement available at the Nov. 29th Meeting. Zoning The site is currently zoned B-2 with some residential lots on the southern boarder. There is an existing stand of evergreens and a concrete wall cutting through these residential lots. This natural break will be left in place. The proposal is for a re -zoning of the entire parcel to B-3. This would allow a continued furniture store use as was done on the adjacent property. The staff has recomended amending the ordinance to allow a convenience center with gasoline. Staff has also recommended showing the 4,200 s.f. building site as a seperate parcel and then treating the required set -back variance this creates as a P.U.D. We look forward to our next meeting to answer any questions which may arise. Feel free to contact us or any of our references at your convience. Yours -truly, DUFFY DEVELOPMENT COMPA14Y John D President SuperAmerica Convenience Store Hwy 110 and Lexington Ave. Mendota Heights, MN. This project has been planned around our newest prototype, which makes use of the very latest in building materials and designs. •Similar materials and design were recently used on Mendota Heights City Hall which is Northwest - across the intersection from this site. We believe the design we intend to utilize for this site will be complimentary to the entire area. We have used landscape planterson as much of this property as possible. The canopy over the gasoline dispensers will be of similar color and materials to blend with the building structure. The building canopy and signage packages have been refined to be as asthbtically inobtrusive as is possible, and the desiqn avoids the sometimes garnish appearance of some old convenience store types. The convenience store operation will be two thousand eight hundred and fifty square feet; the car wash will occupy 768 square feet, and service areas will be 360 square feet for a total building area of approximately 3900 square feet. This project, as well as other convenience store operations, is designed to take advantage of existing traffice patterns and not to create new traffic activity. Our industry finds that we serve as a trip interrupter which serves to ease traffic. Due to the variety of convenience -necessity items we are able to carry, we can actually reduce the number of trips an individual might make during his or her day. As part of this facility we have a solarium -sun room in which it is intended to have a sit down area for lunch and coffee breaks. We have found surrounding offices, businesses, and residences will utilize our self -serve deli and snack area, as somewhat of a lunchroom and coffee shop. MAXFIELD� IgErCIH INC. November 21, 1988 City Council City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 Re: Lexington Plaza South Shopping Center Dear Council Members: We were asked to review the signed leases and leases under consideration for the proposed Lexington Plaza South Shopping Center. The attached tables summa— rize our review of the lease documents. While a neighborhood center is designed to serve the daily shopping needs of nearby residents, this type of center also may have other tenants serving a broader market area. Due to traffic patterns in the area, or the need for new or expanded space of existing nearby businesses, neighborhood centers will also have tenants unique to one particular center. Two of the tenants that have leased space in the proposed center are existing businesses in the area. The furniture store is presently located in an older building on the site of the proposed center. The gun shop is located in Lily— dale, a few miles away. These two tenants will occupancy 56 percent of the leasable space. Both tenants have been in business for many years and both also will become equity owners in the proposed center. The lease rates they will pay are at market rate for the area, $9.50 per square foot triple net, meaning the tenant will pay all operating expenses in addition to the lease amount. Two other smaller tenants have also signed leases for an additional 10 percent of the space in the center. Because they are taking less space, their lease rates are also slightly higher, $10.00 per square foot, again market rate rents for the area. These two tenants, a dry cleaner and a glass replacement compa— ny, are more typical tenants of a neighborhood center. Both of these tenants also have other locations in the Twin Cities and are opening their first stores in the Mendota Heights area. 1 i 620 KICKERNICK, 430 FIRST AVENUE NORTH 612-338-0012 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 City Council November 21, 1988 City of Mendota Heights Page 2 Two other tenants are also seriously interested in leasing space in the center. One, the Dakota County State Bank, would open its third branch facility in the center along with drive -up lanes. They have signed a letter of interest, and depending on the outcome of city approvals for the center, intend to continue lease negotiations. The other is Subway Sandwich which is a national chain of sandwich shops. A local franchisee has a lease in process for 1,200 square feet in the center at a rate of $10.00 to $10.50 per square foot. Croix Oil has signed a purchase agreement to acquire from the shopping center developer a contiguous parcel of land on the corner of Highway 110 and Lexing- ton. They intend to open a 3,900 square foot convenience store and gas station under the SuperAmerica name. Croix Oil has other stores in the Twin City area, and would open a new prototype store on this site. We also reviewed a list of a number of contacts with retailers who were inter- ested in the site, but did not want to continue lease negotiations until the center was a certainty. This behavior is typical of neighborhood center ten- ants, who need to find space for stores for relatively immediate occupancy. Most retailers who are expanding have annual store opening schedules, and until a center's opening date is announced, are more interested in other available spaces. Since this proposed center is not a certainty, most of these prospec- tive tenants will wait to see if and when the center is approved before consid- ering the space. Tenants showing interest have space needs for 24,000 square feet of space, significantly more than the 7,000 to 8,000 square feet of space remaining to be leased in the center. Mr. Duffy shared with us certain assumptions for development costs, expected income and financing. While we have not confirmed each figure, they all appear reasonable based on our experience. Current lease payments from signed tenants are sufficient to cover debt service, based on their financing scenario. Since these tenants all appear to be financially sound and already operate similar businesses, as additional space is leased at rates averaging $10.00 per square foot (reasonable for this market), the center would be profitable. I believe the tenants that have signed leases similar centers. While there is no guarantee business, the tenants committed to this center and are paying market rents. If you have any Sincerely, :MAXFIELD RESEARCH GROUP, INC. Lee A. Maxfield LAM/lmd Attachment are as strong as tenants in other that tenants will not go out of appear to be well capitalized further questions, please call. >ource: Maxfield Research Group, Inc. TABLE 1 TENANT LEASES LEXINGTON PLAZA SOUTH Lease Triple Net Tenant Status Tenant Square Footage Rent Information Signed Cardinal Cleaners 1,000 $10.00 Dry cleaning drop off store. Owned by Dahl Systems - 22 other loca- tions. got signed Curley Furniture 14,000 $ 9.50 Furniture store/warehouse, on site but lease in now. Will become 37.6% partner in final form subject center. Signed W.H. Penny Company 4,000 $ 9.50 Relocating from Diamond Jim's Gun Shop Center - will be 9.4% owner in subject center. In business over 15 years, has another location in Robbinsdale. Signed Glassmasters 2,000 $10.00 Second location in Twin Cities. CPI up Will have four. Will have 6.0% to 5% ownership of center. Subtotal 21.1000 Signed Croix Oil 3,900 Convenience store and gas station. ?urchase Supplier to stations, transports kgreement gasoline, operates other Fina and SuperAmerica stations. Atter of Dakota County State 2$000- 3,000 Main Bank, plus two branches in interest Bank Dakota County. Will open branch 3/4/88 with drive -up. ',ease in Subway Sandwich 1,200 $10.00- National chain - local franchisee. )rocess 10.50 Lease guaranteed by national office. Subtotal 3,200- 4,200 Total 2431500-259300 >ource: Maxfield Research Group, Inc. TABLE, 2 POTENTIAL TENANTS INDICATING INTEREST IN CENTER Source: Maxfield Research Group, Inc. Needed Description/Type of Business Square Footage Pizza 19000 Video or other 2,000 Budget Paint and Wallcovering 1,500 — 2,000 Beauty Shop 800 Florist 1,000 1 Hour Photo' 600 Auto Supply 7,000 Take --out food 1,000 Chiropractic School 1,000 Accountant 800 Health Food 1,200 Barber 19000 Travel Agency 600 Hardware 41000 Source: Maxfield Research Group, Inc. MEMORANDUM DATE: 22 November 1988 TO: Planning Commission and City Council FROM: Howard Dahlgren RE: Preliminary Review, Duffy Development Company Redevelopment Proposal, Southeast Quadrant of Trunk Highway 110 and Lexington Avenue The Duffy Development Company has been studying various ways in which the Tom Curley property can be redeveloped. This property is located in the southeast quadrant of Trunk Highway 110 (TH 110) and Lexington Avenue, with the gas station located at the immediate corner being under separate ownership. Mr. Curley's property consists of 4.7 acres and the gas station property consists of 1.03 acres totalling 5.73 acres. Mr. Duffy, members of the Curley family, and other consultants have met with the staff over the last few months to discuss various development plans. The purpose of this report is to provide background information about the development proposal for a Special Joint Meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission. Most of the development at the immediate corner (in the southeast quadrant) has existed prior to the planning and zoning of the City in the early 1960s and, in fact, dates back to the township era of the City. Mr. Curley developed the residential area to the south in 1954 and retained the north portion of the land for business development. Thus, the development, as it exists, is nonconforming in terms of development standards and is one of the more serious "aesthetic challenges" for the City. Thus, it may be appropriate that members of the Planning Commission and Council approach a potential solution with the anticipation that a successful redevelopment project can occur. Preliminary Review, Duffy Development Co. Page 2 The following are areas of concern that must be addressed in the process of arriving at a successful solution: Access At one time it was anticipated by the Minnesota Highway Department that Trunk Highway 110 (formerly known as Trunk Highway 100) would be upgraded to full limited access status. That is to say there would be grade separations and interchanges at any access point on the highway as extended through the City limits. Thus, a diamond interchange was proposed at Lexington Avenue and TH 110. That concept was dropped with pressure from the City in favor of emphasizing limited access traffic on I-494 and retaining TH 110 as an "urban expressway". It was decided to ultimately develop a service road system parallel to TH 110, moving the service road intersections north and south of TH 110 so as to provide space for a grade separation if needed. Over a period of time, new service roads and connections to Lexington Avenue were developed so that the other three quadrants now have completed service road systems featuring the familiar "buttonhook" concept, with the service roads being some 350 feet south and north of the center of Trunk Highway 110. In the southeast quadrant in question, the service road ends some 240 feet east of Lexington Avenue. Thus, a successful redevelopment of the south quadrant necessitates the development of a public service road connection. This connection would be from the end of the old service road (west end) to a point of intersection on Lexington Avenue opposite the newly constructed service road in the southwest quadrant. The general alignment of this roadway has been agreed upon with its developer and has been proposed as a part of his most recent development proposals. It is essential that this roadway be a public street and designed in accordance with MnDOT standards. Under these conditions it would be the normal practices for MnDOT to pay for the construction of the extended service road, though they do not normally pay for the acquisition of the right-of-way, it being the City's responsibility. Under these conditions, it would be normal for MnDOT to require the closing of the service road access that now exists 460 feet east of Lexington Avenue. Thus, it would appear that whatever land use, zoning, and general development pattern results, the extension of the service road as shown in the attached drawings is the best solution for the access question. Zoning and Land Use Attached is a copy of the zoning map indicating the land in question as zoned B-2, with the Swenson Furniture Company site zoned B-3. The B-2 District does not allow a service station or a furniture store as a permitted or conditional use, therefore, the existing uses on this site are all non -conforming. However, the furniture store is a V/ permitted use in the B-3 District and that is why the Swenson Furniture Store (owned by Mr. Curley) is zoned B-3. C U p Preliminary Review, Duffy Development Co. Page 3 The land across Lexington Avenue to the west is indicated on the zoning map to be zoned B -1A. Actually that land is zoned B-1 which allows similar uses, with a smaller lot size applied to the property at the time it was developed by Larry Lee (the Yorkton Company). . It is interesting to note that at one time the building occupied by Curley's Furniture Library was rented by the City and used for the City Hall. This was prior to the development of the new City Hall facilities in the bank building. In terms of land use, it was hoped that over a period of time the site would be used for the development of L/ a new neighborhood retail facility. The B-2 use to which it was zoned in 1962 provides for such neighborhood facilities. Neither the B-2 nor the B-3 Zone allow for gasoline service stations as permitted or conditional uses. In the past, the City Council has abhorred the idea of additional service stations being developed along TH 110. Thus, the service station use was confined to a conditional use in the B-4 District. The B-4 District is the Shopping Center District which is applied exclusively to the proposed community shopping center site at the southeast corner of Dodd Road and TH 110. The current development proposal includes a new service station, convenience store, and car wash facility to be developed in the parcel created by the extension of the service road to Lexington Avenue. It would seem that if such a facility is designed and built with serious attention to the aesthetic impact of the land in the area of this intersection, it could be a desirable use. The developer and the proposed operator of the service station facilities have prepared detailed plans and a model of the proposed development on the site. We have previously suggested to the developer that some modification to the canopy might be in order, so as to unify the use of materials and the overall aesthetic impact. We understand that the developer and operator of the station have considered this idea and that revisions have been made to the proposed development, though we have not seen them to date. The remainder of the site is proposed to be developed as a neighborhood retail center plus a restaurant. We find the basic use of the land for this purpose to be a positive approach. However, we are concerned about the extension of the zoning and the business use south toward the existing single-family neighborhood. When the Swenson Furniture Store building was approved, a masonry wall was built 30 feet north of the existing right-of-way of Mary Lane. One can see the development of this wall as it relates to the site today on a copy of the attached aerial photo. That wall and the extensive coniferous planting has provided an effective screen to the business development to the north from the residential area. However, the existing south line of the B-2 Zone is at the north line of these residential lots. You will note these lots as they currently are platted on the attached copy of the section maps. You will note that Lots 1 through 8 of Block 1, Curley's Valley View Addition, were platted in anticipation that the rear lots would be on the line forming a transition to the business zoning and development to the north. Preliminary Review, Duffy Development Co. Page 4 The current development proposal would require the extension of this zoning at least to the north side of the wall which is 30 feet north of the south line of the residential lots. If the zoning lines extended to this point, the business structures should be 75 feet from that line when contiguous to an R-1 Zone (as is the case here). The proposed buildings on the development plan are within 24 feet (for the shopping center) and approximately 5 feet for the restaurant., We have discussed these concerns in our meetings with the developer. We are particularly concerned with the proximity of the restaurant to the residential area and the handling of a screen wall, planting, and location of buildings as they relate to the contiguous lots at the west end of Mary Lane. Since the latest staff review this past week, the developer is considering additional adjustments to mitigate this area of concern. At the time of this writing, we have not seen the adjusted plans. One of the solutions to this land use and zoning question could be the elimination of the restaurant as a separate use and the extension of the shopping center structure further to the west. This might allow for the alignment of the access to the rear of the center opposite the entrance to the service station site. This would make it easier for service vehicles to service the center and would make a more logical access point to the center opposite the driveway to the service station. As of the last meeting with the developers, we are informed that the development may include the possibility of a banking facility at the north end of the proposed retail center construction. We have not seen a site plan indicating how this is proposed to be done. However, it is important to maintain access around the north end of the center (to the rear) and to provide sufficient backup space for any proposed drive -up teller facilities. It would appear that the additional land area required for such a facility could be successfully provided for at the west end of the center (near Lexington Avenue). This location, however, may not appeal to bank representatives since the bank will be less visible from TH 110. Summary As noted earlier, the service station facility and car wash are currently conditional uses in the B-4 (Shopping Center) Zone only. We suggest that the Planning Commission and Council consider the possibility of amending the ordinance so as to provide these uses as V/ conditional uses in the B-3 District, if the development proceeds. In most communities, a car wash and service station are conditional uses in the General Business District, which is the B-3 District in Mendota Heights. The other option would be to consider rezoning the property in question to Shopping Center. However, the scale of the land is such that the extreme setbacks required in the B-4 Shopping Center District are out of scale with the site. The minimal lot area for the B-4 District is 10 acres, the front yard is 100 feet, and the setback is 150 feet when contiguous to residential development. Variances to the B-3 District would also have to be considered since the required front yard is 30 feet except where they abut a major thoroughfare, the setback required is 100 feet. Preliminary Review, Duffy Development Co. Page 5 The zoning for the proposed retail center could be the B-2 Zone as it now exists and as it may be extended. In the B-2 Zone, the rear yard and front yard setbacks are 30 feet. Thus, depending upon the final location of the structure as it relates to the south zoning line (on or near the wall), a variance may have to be considered here. In this respect, it is important to ascertain the appearance and height configuration of the structure particularly as it relates to the overhead heating and air conditioning equipment. The use of materials will be important and the general aesthetic impact on the neighborhood will be a prime concern. Revisions should also be made for the extension of the trail system that now exists through the site as it relates to the overall trail system design and the use of the land by persons traveling to and from existing facilities. Revisions for a bike path and pedestrian access could be made at the southwest corner of the site providing access from Curley's Valley View Addition (particularly the north end) to the Lexington Avenue trail system. If the masonry wall and planting configuration that now exists were to be extended to the south along the west side of Patricia Street (as it intersects with Mary Lane), an opening could be left for this path system along the southerly most line of the property. It would appear advantageous for the City to encourage the orderly function and aesthetically desirable redevelopment of the site. Though this may involve assertive action on the part of the City in the form of Tax Increment Financing and cooperative negotiations with MnDOT, it would appear that the aesthetic improvements will be substantial to this area of the City. It would appear that given the configuration of the site and the extension of the service road as generally proposed, the successful solution will occur, working closely with the Planning Commission, Council, and the neighborhood. A detailed examination of sight lines, relative elevations of screening walls, buildings, and building parapets will be important in evaluating the impact on the residential neighborhood to the south. Hopefully, the existing wall structure and screening that has developed over a period of time can be useful in evolving a permanent, aesthetically acceptable solution. 11 •w.^i+omtkH , 1+.36t� r Lp70.54 jSi.7�' 9�1 .. .��11F��r S•o,N o �t 9Rr�.3 6- �.t.wSS0 t 1 �% A ,A1 VEIro v `rV c !4 t b -1 11.19 °t - $ 1 CHAEL D. Du PONT 4. 73.81 i? ! !� 31 FIFST ADDITION I 0 143.00 174.00 - 67.00 145.44 f.lt7c) i r i 0 -- G4o• 5.4 - - S Bq`51 • '6-" W 'i•4 Ite.84 S{ 'PE 104.50 - f 3 4 2 :� � - - i N- 304 E, 160.3 _ _ i r _ 4 3a; ,w 3 �IIn T' ,� '� tT T • - 4 4�`0 ,' !j O�rit 79 = 104.50 j t oil - 30 012-30 7 ee a s t o " 5 VJCTORIA 16WAT"Go : Z o p '7t 14,/6 80.42 p� 103.08 - n 7- 8 O _ nAb 33• E �' Efirnl�' L. Svva/7 030-30 94 84.14 too.34 101.70 igt.76 t 82°p 2 101.72 101.76 ,q< y �,.. 02C)-30 y // c�' /"�/i M 12 m 11 a F 10 a 9 Z6oGa-$ so 040-30 m N; _ R �co�r7�1 � � - • 101.76 10176 60.07 - -��lfa�" G t 96.84 tOi.76 rw t 461.04 -"" NelF33'48'E ,.YZ4 /7S M I • � 1 SUBJECT PROPERTY h -i -n Nafc//-� Gas Co. (ZG G' V t GE E !? it 0 se • V .r. a C a C i i b i \ I 7 4, a dCT 0 n t ire u I u a o• n tt�Y M z V N a \ 0 0 Q - if rr •.7 3 f ] 2 U 040-50 ° 9 f4AQY%lA0 LE t•, t 141.11 16 4e N tu" do 1 ttA 3a . 050-50 f"%'" :: ^ .L tikes •'td' VWA �i: ! t.o •'^"+;;'�J / ,o-_ • -.� 'lip � O LO 'n. // O :°tri:;. >s?.r" 1• .,,,,�'. 060-50 �L6 4c ;'rL.: « ;'ttya.�s •i,�-ir>'x:-•},_ '"� 23 3 c S . ` o+ �$1}}1� :: =�' t2,o".-"`' ,."7,r ,fir.,.. / - ... �,'t:.• •'i• • Za:7G/"/,.1 -d -917/7 N .i yid^. .•%ti �!T., rlkfi :r 1• ti��•F{� h+ ?•rid+ y /� y�+�ry / .�} ( • v iF!f +l �i�• ` / 3 ;.; • _ , i-^ r't .1- Yi.4°J.}j' .; •2.' / ! !- l /1C • 070-50 N 2600 �t r„+'fes" +.��',^ �Y,- � i±! . b•v.'t-�7+4k `:4 :� a -••.% �.. � • / ^•, 7 \ / � -• 1 f' "1' Y til O � i - - • 91 NORTH w.., 50 ' SCALE 111=200' J 19 CNAFt LES c. 1 YAr1 EECW HOwr + IB i 1 8 -C-,n c L a y w k V'oav'4 Ai PA .. • - 3��.."_ . �r r. , N,{ ,'lri,. C -:�'¢dit��,'t`.R+�;''M! i94 " � : ' `�• < 'q' t' '�' .. am 'rte ,t ` _ jy� .,, ` " •....,,,,.,+�c.• ' —Mum •�F a K44ii • iv _ V ' f .ti •t'. m""•=� M .,•,.,...,,,,» 96 ,qr .t. ✓; •'�. �».�;�a+.,2 _ �. t _4 r � - + fir' .. t ' i ! ` "►,tir tA awl im 441 '''3c"t jshs.'�'N! «e { 'a "3•• t1 7 �`.` s t • �y„k�Ty�:: � t �� r `�. r. • ,�. } tie s„ } a 4 " r �? , ',rt � .s; eft-c`; . ; ' ��• 's?s�..�,, .a3�aa�„ rte` \�� `•i.. }7Ur• '�' .�' 'ta »�t�'[. � � �y ��Oljy � '� '.">< ��4�,L i .�. J•�_T,,,".� t�<yya,,«'s ,c ^F ry ::`r ti, � ,S=� j •a�,.��'�" ,� ,fie+ �`• ��, a Imo.. ,t ' .jt t♦. 1 �'�t� t: q '�_ � •r l� t 1 tiL T �t } _ ' � .' i . ,1,.� .JtI H•>;e ae y�p',IY.� � �'{ 1 `� � �; �.r � . � � ,» � 'r'4 � r'r l`a"�r�."."• At sr•c �.` �# � i �j� - �r e t f(s , �1 L wf }'t ..r ��'i' , .a �, �...ii. , i a .; / ��1. rjy4,; (t��'••n �,L .iti7 f y ,.ay..°`` f ,! C� i y j.�L` •� W s >? � �' � � � �:. F .� '� i ts`,,S^""'Sl . » •,E . � a ,a Wit:} 17W. 3I i %t• Q r FJ.• -: •r' f ~f,"••rt .E:- y� i ty , 1 � c ,ice" a '* .� y3 . � ,.. �• rf'� oh•+. .-tia � � Y.L'� t i '.�"r4�'•~r al= `• .. r,Y� ' <7'''�'�ru� �„f:�.• ,.ice` "NOR 7v "MIPMMWM"�pw, ' 7 Z"J= Ad' I* i'� SECTION 13. "B-2" NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT 13.1 Permitted i Uses Within any B-2", Neighborhood Business District, no structure or land shall be used except for one (1) or more of the foll- owing uses, or uses deemed similar by the Council. 1 13.1(1) Antique or gift shop. 13.1(2) Appliancelstore. 13.1(3) Art and school supply store. 13.1(4) Auto accessory store. 13.1(5) Bakery good sales and baking of goods for retail sales on premise. , 13.1(6) Banks and banking institutions without drive-in facilities. 13.1(7) Barber Shop. 13.1(8) Beauty shop. 13.1(9) Bicycle sales and repair. 13.1(10) Book, office supply and stationery store. 13.1(11) Candy, ice cream, popcorn, nuts, frozen dessert and soft drink shop but not of the drive-in type. 13.1(12) Camera and photographic supply store. 13.1(13) Delicatessen and/or dairy store. 13.1(14) Drug store. 13.1(15) Dry cleaning and laundry pick-up stations including incidental pressing and repair. 13.1(16) Dry goods: store. 13.1(17) Gift or novelty store. 13.1(18) Grocery, fruit or vegetable store. 13.1(19) Hardware store. 13.1(20) Hobby store including handicraft classes not to exceed ten (10) students. 13.1(21) Jewelry sales and repair store. 13.1(22) Laundroma't of the self-service type. 13.1(23) Library.I 13.1(24) Newsstand. 13.1(25) Offices.:� 13.1(26) Paint, wallpaper sales. 13.1(27) Photographic studio. 13.1(28) Pipe andtobacco shop. 13.1(29) Record shop. 13.1(30) Traditional restaurant cafe, tea room, with no drive-in or fast food facility. 13.1(31) Shoe sales and repair. 13.1(32) Small appliance repair shop. 13.1(33) Sportingagoods store. 13.1(34) Variety store. 13.1(35) Wearing apparel shop. I (401) 58 13.2 Conditional Uses Within any "B-2", Neighborhood Business District, no struct- ure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit. 13.2(l) Tavern. i 13.2(2) Theaters but not of the drive-in type. 13.2(3) Private lodges and clubs. 13.2(4) Accessor I y structures other than private garages. 13.2(5) Essential service structures. 13.2(6) Animal Hoc'Mital (Veterinary C inic). As used hereunder the term "Animal Hospital" or "Vet rinary Clinic" shall be deemed in'c It r in to mean a facility for the dia nosis, treatment and medical care of'small animals, in which all professional services are conducted within an enclosed building and which excludes the kenneling of such animals ex pt for the time period nec- essary '\e essary to provide medical care therefor. DA 04 �31 654 Any conditional use permit for an Animal Hospital (Veterinary Clinic) shall be subject to the following conditions: 1.1 No noise from the operation of the facility shall be discernible beyond the boundaries of the lot on which the use is conducted. To achieve noise con- trol, the facility shall be of masonry construction with outside walls at least 8" thick, and with a precast concrete roof. 2.j odor control shall consist of a ventilation system designed so that no odors or organisms will spread between wards or to the outside air. An air condi- tioning system may be required, with windows double glazed with fixed sash. 3.1 An approved system shall be provided for the storage and disposal of dead animals off the premises. 4.� Large dog facilities for indoor exercise of such animals shall be provided. No outside pens shall be permitted. 5.i When abutting a residential district, an approved screening and landscaping plan shall be filed and developed along the property boundary lines that abut the "R" District. 6.: Hours at which the facility will be open to the I public for the receiving and pick up of animals shall be approved by the City Council to insure compatibility with surrounding land uses. (401) 59 7. Off-street parking facilities shall be provided, of at least the ratio required for professional offices under Section 18.1(4)q of the Zoning Ordinance of one space for each two hundred (200) square feet of floor area in the building. 8. An Animal Hospital may include a live-in facility to permit a staff member to be on the premises 24 hours per day. Such facility shall be limited to 620 square feet of floor space and shall not be designed to serve as a "single-family residence" as hereinbefore defined in this Ordinance. 13.2(7) The sale and servicing of heating equipment, air conditioning equipment and electrical appliances provided that there shall not be more than six persons employed upon said premises in the repair or servicing of said equipment or appliances. 13.3 Permitted Accessory Uses Within any "B-2" District the following uses shall be per- mitted accessory uses. 13.3(1) Any accessory use permitted in Section 11.3. 13.3(2) Any incidental repair, processing or storage necessary to conduct a permitted princiapl use shall not occupy more than twenty (20) percent of the gross floor area of the principal building. 13.4 Lot Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements 13.4(1) No structure or building shall exceed three (3) stories or thirty (30) feet whichever is less in height except as pro- vided in Section 20 of this Ordinance. 13.4(2) The floor -area -ratio within the "B-2" Use District shall not exceed 0.5. 13.4(3) The following minimum requirements shall be observed subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications as set forth in Section 20. Height, Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard 1, 2 & 15,000 100 feet 30 feet 15 feet 30 feet 3 stories square or equal feet to height of struc- ture, which- ever is greater. 13.5 General Requirements as specified in Section 4.17 of this Ordinance. (401) 60 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA . ORDINANCE NO. 231 "I ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS I ZONING ORDINANCE The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, ordains as follows: Section 1.� Ordinance No. 401 known and referred to as the "Mendota Heights Zoning Ordinance" is hereby amended in the following respect: The following paragraph is hereby amended in Section 13.2(6) of said ordinance: 13.2(6) Animal Hospital (Veterinary Clinic). As used hereunder, the term "Animal Hospital" or "Veterinary Clinic" shall be deemed to mean a facility for the diagnosis, treatment and medical care of small animals, in which all professional i services are conducted within an enclosed building and which includes the kenneling of such animals. Section 2.i This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its publication according to law. I Enacted and ordained into an Ordinance this 7th day of April, 1987. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Cftarles E. Mer t . ensu to Mayor ATTEST: at leen M. Swanson ity Clerk SECTION 14. "B-3" GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT 14.1 Permitted Uses I Within 'any "B-3", General Business District, no structure or land shall be used except for one (1) or more of the follow- ing use's, or uses deemed similar by the Council. 14.1(1) "B-1", Limited Business and "B-2", Neighborhood Business Dis- trict Uses as permitted in Section 13.1 but not limited in scale too serving residents of the surrounding area although otherwise regulated and specified except as hereinafter modi- fied. 14.1(2) Automobile and other vehicles of transportation sales when conducted entirely within a building. 14.1(3) Auto repair (minor), when conducted entirely within a build- ing. 14.1(4) Boats and nd marine sales when conducted entirely within a building. 14.1(5) Building material yards, provided it is conducted entirely within'an enclosed structure. 14.1(6) Commercial greenhouse provided all outside storage is fenced in such a manner so as to screen the stored material from view when observed from the public street. 14.1(7) Diaper or hand laundry service, provided not more than ten (10) pe rsons are employed. 14.1(8) Furniture sales. 14.1(9) Gardenisupply store, provided it is conducted entirely with- in an enclosed structure. 14.1(10) interior decorating studio. 14.1(11) Locksmith. 14.1(12) Medical and dental clinics. 14.1(13) Motels) motor hotels and.hotels, provided the site shall contain not less than six hundred (600) square feet of lot I area per living or rental unit. 14.1(14) Newspaper and publishing office. 14.1 (15) Office buildings. (401) 61 14.1(16) Optical and jewelry manufacturing provided the operation is not located within the front sixty (60) feet of the first floor. 14.1(17) Pet shop, provided the opertion shall not include the boarding of pets on the site, the maintaining of pens or cages outside of the building or the operating so as to cause an offensive odor or noise. 14.1(18) Photographic supplies and processing of film and prints. 14.1(19) Picture framing. 14.1(20) Printing shop. 14.1(21) Physical culture and health studio. 14.1(22) Radio and television repair. 14.1(23) Rugs and floor coverings sales. 14.1(24) Seat cover, upholstery or drapery shop. 14.1(25) Wholesale office and showroom. 14.2 Conditional Uses Within any "B-3", General Business District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except through granting a conditional use permit: 14.2(1) Armories, convention halls, sport arenas and stadiums. 14.2(2) Bowling alleys, billiard and pool rooms, skating rinks, liquor stores, fraternal organizations and similar uses, provided the structure in which the use is conducted shall not be located within one hundred (100) feet of any "R" District. 14.2(3) Bus terminals. 14.2(4) Business or trade school when conducted entirely within a building. 14.2(5) Electrical service, heating, plumbing, applicances, upholstery or air conditioning service shop, provided they do not employ more than six (6) persons in repair or processing. 14.2(6) Stone and monument sales. 14.2(7) Television and radio stations and transmitting towers. 14.2(8) Accessory structures, other than private garages. ( 401) 62 14.2 (9) 14.3 i Animal Hospital (Veterinary Clinic). As used hereunder the term "Animal Hospital" or "Veterinary Clinic" shall be deemed to mean a facility for the diagnosis, treatment and medical care of small animals, in which all professional services are conducted within an enclosed building and which excludes the kenneling of such animals except for the time period necessary to provide medical care therefor. Any conditional use permit for an Animal Hospital (Veterinary Clinic) shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. No noise from the operation of the facility shall be discernible beyond the boundaries of the lot on which the use is conducted. To achieve noise control, the facility shall be of masonry construction with ;outside walls at least 8" thick, and with a precast «concrete roof. 2. 10dor control shall consist of a ventilation system designed so that no odors or organisms will spread ;between wards or to the outside air. An air conditioning system may be required, with windows ;double glazed with fixed sash. 3. 5. CM 7. An approved system shall be provided for the storage "and disposal of dead animals off the premises. !Large dog facilities for indoor exercise of such !animals shall be provided. No outside pens shall be permitted. I !When abutting a residential district, an approved jscreening and landscaping plan shall be filed and 'developed along the property boundary lines that ,abut the "R" District. Hours at which the facility will be open to the public for the receiving and pick up of animals shall be approved by the City Council to insure compatibility with surrounding land uses. Off-street parking facilities shall be provided, of at least the ratio required for professional offices under Section 18.1(4)q of the Zoning Ordinance of one space for each two hundred (200)square feet of floor area in the building. Permitted Accessory Uses I Within any "B-3" District permitted accessory uses: the following uses shall be 14.3(1) Anyiuse permitted in Section 11.3 of this Ordinance. (401) 63 14.3(2) Any incidental repair or processing necessary to conduct a permitted use shall not exceed twenty (20) percent of the floor space of the principal building. 14.4 Lot Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements 14.4(1) No structure or building shall exceed two (2) stories or thirty (30) feet in height whichever is the less except as provided in Section 20 of this Ordinance. 14.4(2) The minimum lot area shall be twenty-five thousand(25,000) square feet. 14.4(3) The floor -area -ratio shall not exceed 0.5. 14.4(4) Wherever a "B-3", General Business District, abuts or is across the street from an "R" District, a fence or compact evergreen screen not less than fifty (50) percent opaque nor less than six (6) feet in height except adjacent to a street where it shall be not less than three (3) or more than four (4) feet, in height, shall be erected and maintained in the front portion of the lot or along the side or rear property line that abuts the "R" District. 14.4(5) The following minimum requirements shall be observed subject to additional requirements, exceptions and definitions as set forth in this Section and Section 20. Front Yard 30 feet Front yard abutting a major thoroughfare 100 feet Lot Width 150 feet Side Yard Adjacent to Street 30 feet Adjacent to "R" District 75 feet Interior 30 feet Rear Yard 30 feet Rear Yard Adjacent to "R" District 75 feet 14.4(6) General Requirements as specified in Section 4.17 of this Ordinance. (401) 63A SECTION 15. "B-4" SHOPPING CENTER DISTRICT 15.1 Purpose The purpose of this district is to establish provisions for the designating of a district where a multiple building retail sales and service facility can be erected with integrated design and a coordinated physical plan, which is appropriately located. Such district shall be developed as a planned unit development according to an approved plan as provided below. 15.2 Application The owner or owners of any tract of land in the B-4 District comprising an area of not less than ten (10) acres of land and five hundred (500) feet of frontage may submit to the Administrator a plan for the use and development of all or part of such tract for the purposes of and meeting the requirements set forth in this Section. The proposed plan shall be referred to the Planning Commission for study and report. The Planning Commission shall transmit to the Council their findings and recommend- atidns for consideration and action. 15.3 Administration In order that the purpose of this district may be realized, the land and buildings and appurtenant facilities shall be in single ownership or under the management or super- vision of a central authority. 15.4 Design Requirements 15.4(1) The physical design may include more than one building. However, should such buildings provide an open space between two buildings said space shall not be less than one-half NO the sum of the heights of the two buildings. 15.4(2) No building shall be nearer than sixty (60) feet to an*. lot except when abutting or across the street from an "R" District; no building shall be less than one hundred (100) feet from such lot lines. 15.4(3) The design shall include adequate internal circulation drives not less than twenty-two (22) feet in width which are exclusive of the required parking area. 15.4(4) The driveway curb cuts to the development shall be approved by the City Engineer. (401) 64 15.4 (5) No building shall exceed three (3) stories or thirty-five (35) feet whichever is less. 15.4(6) Parking off-street, loading and sign requirements shall. be in conformance with this Ordinance. 15.4(7) The entire area shall be landscaped or occupied by buildings or structures or parking areas so treated as to control dust. Should the development be undertaken in stages, all of the area included in the various stages constructed or to be constructed at that time shall be developed in accordance with the Planned Unit Development Section of this Ordinance. 15.4(8) A drainage plan shall be designed and approved for the entire area with such on-site underground construction as determined by the City. 15.4(9) All buildings shall be finished on all exterior walls with the same material. 15.4(10) There shall be no outside sales and storage. 15.4(11) The floor -area -ratio shall not exceed 1.0. 15.4(12) Lot coverage of buildings shall not exceed twenty-five (25) percent of the lot area. 15.5 - Permitted Uses Within the "B-4", Shopping Center District, no structure or land shall'be used except for one or more of the following uses. 15.5(1) "B-21', Neighborhood Business District uses as permitted in Section 13.1, but not limited in scale to serving residents of the surrounding area although otherwise regulated as specified except as hereinafter modified. 15.5(2) Bank. 15.5(3) Department store. 15.5(4) Five and ten store. 15.5(5) Florist store. 15.5(6) Furniture store. (401) 65 15.5(7) Interior decorating studio. 15.5(8) Library. 15.5(9) Locksmith. 15.5(10) Medical and dental clinic. 15.5(11) Music store. 15.5(12) Photographic supplies and processing. 15.5(13) Physical cultures or dance studio. 15.5(14) Post office. 15.6 Conditional Uses Within any "B-4", Shopping Center District, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit. 15.6(1) Motor fuel stations subject to the requirements of Section 18.2 of this Ordinance. 15.6(2) Rental units on a motor fuel station. 15.6(3) Essential service structures. 15.6(4) Accessory structures. 15.6(5) Liquor store as regulated by other City Ordinances. 15_.6 (6) ---.Car- wash__ 15.6(7) Motel and motor hotels. 15.6(8) Automatic vending devices not enclosed in a structure. 15.6(9) Newspaper and/or magazine stand. 15.6(10) Drive-in and fast food restaurants subject to the provisions of Section 18.3 of this -Ordinance. 15.6(11) Advertising signs as regulated in Section 18.7(3) of this Ordinance. (401.) 66 15.7 Permitted Accessory Uses Within any "B-4", Shopping Center District, the following uses shall be permitted accessory uses. 15.7(1) Any uses permitted in Section 11.3. 15.7(2) Any incidental repair or processing necessary to conduct a permitted use shall not exceed twenty (20) percent of the floor space of the principal building. 15.8 Lot Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Requirements 15.8(1) In the case of a corner lot, each side abutting a public street shall be treated as a front yard. 15.8(2) Minimum requirements shall be observed subject to additional execution and definitions as set forth in this Section and Section 20. Minimum Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Abutting "R" District Side Yard Abutting "R" District Rear. Yard Abutting "R" District Maximum Height 10 Acres 500 feet 100 feet 150 feet 60 feet 100 feet 60 feet 100 feet 3 stories or 35 feet whichever is less 15.9 General. Requirements as specified in Section 4.17 of this Ordinance. (401) 67 18.1(6)b Retail Sales and Service Stores, Offices - At least one (1) loading berth twenty-five (25) feet in length for each build- ing having six thousand (6,000) square feet of floor area or more plus one (1) additional loading berth fifty (50) feet in length for each twenty-five thousand (25,000) square feet of floor area up to one hundred thousand (100,000) square feet. 18.1(6)c Manufacturing, Fabrication, Processing and Warehousing - At least one (1) loading berth twenty-five (25) feet in length for each building having three thousand (3,000) square feet or fraction thereof plus one (1) loading berth fifty (50) feet in length for each twenty-five thousand (25,001) square feet of floor area up to one hundred thousand (100,000) square feet plus one .(1) loading berth for each fifty thou- sand (50,000) square feet of floor over the -first one hundred thousand (100,000) square feet of floor area. The operator of the business shall have the option to declare the length of the berth required for buildings above one hundred thou- sand (100,000) square feet of floor area, except that one half (2) or more of the total number of berths required shall be fifty (50) feet in length.. 18.1(6)d Non -Residential Uses having 5,000 Square Feet of Floor Space or -More and Not Included as Part of a, b and c of this Sec- tion shall Provide Loading Berths as Follows - Four thousand (4,000) to twenty thousand (20,000) square feet floor area, one loading berth; for each additional ten thousand (10,000) square feet of floor area or fraction thereof above 2,500 square feet,'one (1) additional loading berth. 18.2 Motor Fuel Stations and Motor Fuel Station Convenience Stores in all Districts shall be Subject to the Following Provisions: 18.2(1) All motor fuel stations and motor fuel station convenience stores shall require the issuance of a conditional use permit as per Section 5.6 of this Ordinance. Upon the issuance of a conditional use permit for a motor fuel station and con- venience store by the Council, said permit shall be in force on a temporary basis for a period not to exceed fifteen (15) .months from the date of issuance. If during said fifteen (15) month period, construction has not been completed and the motor fuel station is in operation for a period of less than thirty (30) days said conditional use permit shall be void. 18.2(2) Area and Design Requirements 18.2(2)a Any building used as a motor fuel station or convenience store shall be constructed and maintained as required by the rules and regulations relating to the State Fire Marshall governing the handling, storage and transportation of flamm- able liquids. Every facility, whether underground or above ground and whether indoors or out-of-doors, for the handling, storage, and movement of flammable liquids shall be construc- ted and maintained in accordance with the rules and regula- (401.) 82 tions of the State Fire Marshall. 18.2(2)b Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in other sections of this ordinance, the following minimum requirements shall be observed for yards and setbacks of motor fuel stations and convenience stores: Minimum lot size one acre Lot Width 200 feet Front Yard 60 feet Side Yard - interior 30 feet adjacent to street 60 feet Rear Yard 50 feet Pump Setback 40 feet 18.2(2)c Each side abutting a public street shall be considered a front yard. 18.2(2)d A setback of any overhead canopy weather projection free- standing or projecting from the station structure shall be not less than twenty (20) feet from the street right-of-way line or less than twenty (20) feet from the adjacent proper- ty line. 18.2(2)e Total height of any overhead canopy or weather projection shall not exceed twenty (20) feet. 18.2(3) Parking and Driveways. 18.2(3)a The surface parking and service areas except for access driveways shall be no closer than twenty (20) feet from any exterior property line. 18.2(3)b Entire motor fuel station site other than that part devoted to landscaping and structures shall be surfaced with asphal- tic or cement concrete surfacing to control dust and pro- vide adequate drainage and such surfaces shall be designed to fit the requirements of a minimum seven (7) ton axle load. 18.2(3)c All interior curbs shall be constructed within the property lines to separate driving, parking and service areas from landscape and the public right-of-way areas. Such curbing shall be constructed of concrete and shall be of a six (6) inch non -surmountable design. 18.2(3)d All rental campers, trailers, or motor vehicles shall be stored within the rear and/or side yard not adjacent to the street. 18.2(3)e All access drives shall be a minimum of fifty (50) feet mea- sured along the property line from -the intersection of two (2) streets. 18.2(3)f The minimum distance between driveways shall be thirty (30) feet measured along the property line. (401) 83 18.2(3)g The minimum driveway angle shall be forty-five (45) degrees. 18.2(3)h All outside parking spaces shall be located in the side and/or rear of the principal structure not adjacent to the street. 18.2(3)i A minimum of four (4) outside parking spaces plus three (3) additional outside parking spaces for each enclosed service stall shall be provided. One'(1) additional outside space shall be provided for each one hundred fifty (150) square feet of floor space devoted to retail sales in a motor fuel station convenience store. In the case of rental of trailers trucks and other vehicles one (1) parking space shall be pro- vided for each rental unit. 18.2(3)] All goods for sale by the motor fuel station or convenience store shall be displayed within the principal structure. There shall be no outside display or sales. 18.2(3)k Service station premises shall not be used as a place of storage for wrecked, abandoned or junked automobiles. No motor vehicle in need of repair shall be stored on the pre- mises of a service station for a continuous period of more than seven (7) days, except when so stored pursuant to a police directive. 18.2(3)1 Service station premises shall not be used as a place of sale or resale, or as a place for display for sale or re- sale, of new or used motor vehicles, trailers or campers. 18.2(3)m Access and parking areas shall be designated so as to provide an adequate means of access to a public alley or street. Said driveway access shall not exceed thirty (30) feet in width at the public street right-of-way line and shall be so limited so as to cause the least interference with the traffic movement. All public parking areas shall have acc- ess off driveways and not directly off a public street. All outside parking spaces shall be clearly marked on the pave- ment. 18.2(4) Architecture, Landscaping and Lighting 18.2(4)a A minimum twenty (20) foot landscaped yard shall be planted and maintained within all property lines except at driveway entrances. 18.2(4)b Each motor fuel station shall be architecturally designed so as to be compatible with the general architectural intent of the area in which it is located. 18.2(4)c For the purposes of architectural appropriateness, each and every side of the motor fuel station shall be considered as a front face. 18.2(4)d Used oil cans, discarded auto parts, discarded tires, trash, waste materials, and similar items of debris shall not be stored on service station premises, unless such items (40.1) 84 4 of debris are located in an enclosure and are completely out of public view. Such debris shall be removed from the pre- mises at least once a week. •,.2(4)e No materials shall be burned on the premises of a service station, except in an approved commercial incinerator com- plying with the ordinances of the municipality. Barrels and similar containers shall not be used for incineration. 18.2(4)f Tires for sale shall not be stored or displayed outside the service station structure, except (a) in a display rack dur- ing business hours, or (b) in a permanent outside display container located in conformance with the setback require- ments of the zoning ordinance of the municipality and com- pletely enclosable. Such display container shall be closed when the station is not open for business. 18.2(4)g 'All outdoor illumination shall be provided with lenses, re- flectors or shades which shall concentrate the lights upon the premises so as to prevent any glare or rays of light being directly visible upon adjacent street, roadway, or adjacent property. 18.2(4)h Wherever a motor fuel station abuts on a residential dis- trict, a fence or compact evergreen hedge not less than 50 percent opaque nor less than six (6) feet high shall be erec- ted and maintained along the side and rear property line that abuts the residential district. Application of this provi- sion shall not require a fence within fifteen (15) feet of any street right-of-way line. 18.2(4)i Open dead storage of motor vehicles shall not be permitted for a period of more than forty-eight (48) hours.. 18.2(5) Signs 18.2(5)a All signs shall conform with the district requirements in which the motor fuel station and convenience store is loca- ted. 18.2(5)b Banners, flags (other than the flags. of the U.S.A. and the State of Minnesota and the United Nations) penants and simi- lar promotional display devices may be permitted for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days after the issuance of a cert- ificate of occupancy. 18.3 Drive -In and Fast Food Restaurants 18.3(1) All fast food and drive-in restaurants shall require the issuance of a conditional use permit as per Section 5.6 of this Ordinance. Upon issuance, said permit shall be in force on a temporary basis for a period not to exceed fifteen (15) months from the date of issuance. If during this fifteen (15) month period construction is not completed, the condi- tional use permit shall be void. (401) 85 SPRINGSTED PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101.2143 612.223.3000 Fax: 612.223.3002 November 21, 1988 Mr. Kevin Frazell City Administrator 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Kevin: I am writing in response to our phone conversation on November 18, 1988 regarding Springsted Incorporated's ability to assist the City of Mendota Heights in analyzing a developer's request for assistance from the City on a redevelopment project. This is a service which we would generally provide in the context of debt issuance with a client. Since you anticipate no debt issuance requirements on this issue we would charge the City on our standard hourly fee for service schedule. That schedule is: Senior Officer Project Manager Other Officers Other Professional Staff Support Staff $150/hour 125 /hour IIS/hour 90/hour $35/hour Rather than establish a fixed contract rate our preference * is to assist the City, at their discretion, in those areas where they feel they need assistance. As an example some clients will request us to actually assist them and be present at negotiating sessions with developers so that we can advise them on a full range of developer/city negotiating points. In other cases, the cities will provide to us a series of financial alternatives which they are considering and ask us to review them as to which proposal has the most financial merit from the city's standpoint. Kevin, as I indicated on the phone, this is not an area where we want to have an open meter running. Rather we prefer to be brought in by the City when they feel the timing is appropriate and to respond to the City in a cost-effective manner. Please feel free to contact me at your convenience should you need additional information. Yours truly, BNZ�C Robert D. Thistle Vice President mj t Indiana Office: Wisconsin Office: 251 North Illinois Street, Suite 1510 500 Elm Grove Road, Suite 101 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204.1942 Elm Grove, Wisconsin 53122.0037 317.237.3636 414.782.8222 Fax: 317.237.3639 Fax: 414.782.2904 f CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO NOVEMBER 25, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council, and Cit yy or FROM: Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer SUBJECT: Financial Consideration - Lexington/110 Redevelopment To come up with reasonable figures for the proposed redevelopment, it is necessary to use several assumptions as to the cost of the acquisition of the land. The County Assessor has provided detail values for the proposed new construction which should be reasonably close. The following plan would show the framework within which the project could proceed. Property Library SOS Total Acquisition Demolition & Clean up Costs Total Costs Acquisition of Existing Property: Assessor's Mkt. Value $108,600 137,700 - Land Sale Proceeds Net City Investment Purchase Price Est. $150,000 150,000 300,000 $ 75,000 $375,000 $105,000 $270,000 Sale Back Land $25,000 80,000 $105,000 All City interest would be on the SOS and Furniture Library sites, and not on the open land. Portions of the Library site would be sold to the developer and another portion to the Croix Oil. It is possible, because of some other relationships, that Croix Oil might be able to purchase the SOS site directly from the current owners. If this is possible, the City would not have to take title to the site and be in a position of responsibility for any pollution. The immediate City outlay would be reduced to the $150,000 range, and some thought could be given to other forms of TI assistance to offset the Croix Oil demolition and clean up costs. To compute the future tax paid by the project, we have used the Assessor's valuation of each element and figured tax as the law will apply in 1990. This law gives us a tax capacity for each project, which I then discounted to our present use of tax capacity of 75%. Shopping Center Assessor's Tax Current 32,000 sq. ft Mkt. Value Capacity Use 75% @ 41.74 per $1,735,000 $89,137 66,852 sq. ft, plus land at $400,000 Convenience Store 3200 sq. ft @ 39.62 per sq. ft 226,780 10,440 7,830 plus land at $100,000 Total Tax Paid 74,682 Less Current Levy (TI Base) 10.137 64,545 Less Fiscal Disparity Contribution @ 40% 25,800 Net City Tax Realized 38,795 Less City Adm. Reimbursement 10% 3.879 $34,916 Repayment of Development Costs City Net Investments $270,000 Repayment @ 7%'Interest 11.52 years The project area is part of the larger City tax Investment District which is now producing about $800,000 annually of income. The District has sufficient funds on hand to undertake the project, and no borrowing would be necessary. This avoids some of the requirements for signed development agreements prior to the start of the project. Any developers agreement should contain as a minimum the following: 1. Completion guarantee. 2. Minimum Tax guarantee. 3. Resale agreement. 4. Time limits for completion. 5. Evidence of financing 6. Pollution guarantees to the City. LES:np c�bw �o�L`v'7o L O� -- laD Cf of IS, x,66 0 y:tHwr. tie..uo------------- Land Area Convenlenoe Center 115,000 1.03 ■e. Senioa Road 31,200 .72 ae. Shop Ing Center 123,488 2. 3 ea. Restaurant Site 36,900 .85 s5. 1 4atrilstion aq7 ft. soverese Convenience Center 2V,i000 0 S7.2 Parking building 17.300 38.110 Oren Perking Stell Shown 18 Shopping Center 32.000 25.911 Bull d ins 50,200 47.11 Parking 33.285 27.0{ Ore an Farting Stalls Shown 126 Restaurant Site 6,200 11.4 Bullding 16,700 45.2j Parking 16,000 43.4! Crwn Parking Stella Shown 27 Parking Required DP City Coda Furniture Store 27 14, 0005. f. +' Retail SP -00 126_ 18.0005.!. Total 153 \ mweaR weswes weftwesasaas::azsaa: a3}� =i sa== =wax= _ �= ==== / � M/�RY Ls.NL I -- - • ----•- — � � - .JI'TG PL^N - LCXiNGTON PLAZA / MEw.00Ti. N�Ibf+TS MINNl40TA D'Y DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ►t,-06 M.— ktsfad bas e1M1 FLPill U74 M O to a0 M I L W_ urs ., -- %j r4/U S116! FTF F7^-�j 6eA4.61 is- 4tp'-v* I wtw 45.000 MT'SM taa« 31.200 1.72 M. I 6Mry1ng oar! 160.766 ).66 ..• / / M. M ..ra:ya 0../a.la.aa On.tae 37.76o 7B.Yf para. \\ \ / . \ rari.6 es.11, sraa. 1s abowng ooutw 32.000 39.160 20.0% h1•klng 6'9.266 j3.2% m\6. —. - �� 1 r•::s.s sta1L "� 137 / punting bga1/+6 %W elV ora TBIIT !r¢nitara tta�. s7 li.000a.f. ro all 6}raa jg 8.000m.f. • / • � / `1 2.1a1 li7 �'�----saa a. a•—eta= a. at Ifs at a•Ms —: Aw at--" 15 _ bar, PLob+N - I.f.J tw&-rom PLAZA —__ _ • _: M40oTi.• MaWfiS M�►+/+LlCfI► _ .. DEVEi�P��I'I' COMPANY � •. 6Y �11� µ6fr � t L �/ ----ALT • --