Loading...
1988-07-19PRE -COUNCIL MEETING JULY 19, 1988 = 6:00 P.M. 1. Follow-up Meeting with Ivy Falls Creek residents (Resolution No. 88-44) 2. Adjourn to Regular City Council Meeting. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA JULY 19, 1988 = -7:3 0 P.M. 1. Call to order. -- 7-7o 2. Roll Call. —Jy Aw- 3. Agenda Adoption. Y 4. Approval of the my 5 Minutes Available Monday — 5. Consent Calendar: a. Approval of Pabst Final Plat (Resolution No. f b. Acknowledgement of Treasurer's Report For June c. Acknowledgement of the Minutes of the July 12 PRE -COUNCIL MEETING JULY 19, 1988 = 6:00 P.M. 1. Follow-up Meeting with Ivy Falls Creek residents (Resolution No. 88-44) 2. Adjourn to Regular City Council Meeting. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA JULY 19, 1988 = -7:3 0 P.M. 1. Call to order. -- 7-7o 2. Roll Call. —Jy Aw- 3. Agenda Adoption. Y 4. Approval of the my 5 Minutes Available Monday — 5. Consent Calendar: a. Approval of Pabst Final Plat (Resolution No. 88-45) b. Acknowledgement of Treasurer's Report For June c. Acknowledgement of the Minutes of the July 12 Parks & Recreation Meeting d. Adoption of (Resolution No. 88-46) Ordering Street Light Assessment Hearing e. Approval of 1988 Seal Coating -f. Approval of.Copperfield IV Feasibility Study (Resolution No. 88-47) g. Approval of Partial Payment to Joseph Co. h. Approval of Partial Payment to Doody Mechanical i. Approval of Partial Payment to Thomas Electrical j. Approval of Contractor Licenses k. Approval of List of Claims End of Consent Calendar. 6. Introductions. — // ov 7. Public Comments. r• y 8. Bid Award and Public Hearing: a. Awar of City Hall Telephone System Bi',d. Ltd b. Vacation of Eugenia Street. 8:15 P.M. (Bring information from �0; meeting (Cont' u d from 17 July 5 meeting). Jull r c. Assessment Roll for Lexington Heights Apartments ire �iydrant Installation (Resolution No. 88-48) d. A sessment Roll for Wi low Springs Addition Creek yaligpment Resolution LTo., 88-49) e. Assessment Roll for Stratford Woods (Resolution No. 88-50) 4 jal _0-� 4�6 r 9. Unfinished and New Business. (}d� a. CASE NO. 88-L9, C. iggein Aipaxtmenis. (Resolution No. 88-51) . _�7� �.,-�^ - b. KensingtonPUD Final a (Resolution No. 88-52) - lP - C. RighUurn ane on Delaware Ave.,,.,, d. Participation of Property Tax Lawsuit (Resolution No. 88-53) -14 e. Radio er at New C ty Mall - %it u.. 10. Respons om n sntss.. '�, ,fi g� OcY. J5-4- a. s - a. Lexing on Ajj.tr t Lights 11. Council Comments. 12. Adj ourn . —1 ;3 0 e MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS July 19, 1988 To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevin Fr �i y Administrator Re: Add -On Agenda for July 19th There are no additional items for this evening's agenda; therefore, Council can work from the previously submitted agenda printed on yellow paper. New information is submitted for Items 5.e. and 9.a. 5.e. 1988 Seal Coating Program Please see attached memo from Public Works Director Jim Danielson. ACTION REQUIRED In addition to the motion approving the plans and specifications for the 1988 seal coating program, Council motion should be for approval of a purchase order to Struck and Irwin Paving, Inc. in the amount of $10,097.22, for slurry sealing of Apache Ct., Apache Ln., Nashua Ln., and specified portions of Cheyenne Ln. 9.a. CASE NO: 88-19, C.G. Rein Apartments Attached is the opinion of independent legal counsel, Tim Kuntz, concerning whether approval of the requested conditional use permit for the apartments is, in essence, a rezoning action that requires a 4/5's vote of the Council. He concludes that it is not. Mr. Kuntz will be at the meeting to give a verbal presentation of his opinion, and to answer other legal questions that may arise concerning this matter. Also attached is a letter from City Planner Howard Dahlgren discussing the concept of the planned unit development, and why it is not the same as a rezoning. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO JULY 19, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and C PA m' istrator FROM: James E. Danielson, P.W. ctor SUBJECT: Slurry Seal Purchase Order DISCUSSION• Staff has received the attached bid to slurry seal Apache Court, Apache Lane, Nashua Lane, and the east 600 feet of Cheyenne Lane. There are no slurry seal contractors within the Twin Cities area, so this bid is from a Madison, Wisconsin contractor. This contractor will be in the Twin Cities in early August to do some airport work. Staff is still attempting to get a second bid for a thin hot mix overlay to compare prices. However, we estimate that the hot mix bid will be significantly higher. RECOMMENDATION• Because Struck & Irwin Paving will be in and out of town before the Council meets again, staff recommends that Council award a purchase order tonight and allow them to slurry seal Apache Court, Apache Lane, Nashua Lane, and the east 600 feet of Cheyenne Lane for their bid of $10,097.22. If the hot mix thin overlay bid comes in lower than the slurry seal, staff then will not issue this purchase order. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation, they should pass a motion awarding the purchase order to Struck & Irwin Paving, Inc. JED:madlr N T --- _ MAKS Z - - - - �! �� _ • -401JAIL.I c • - - -PARK ' r• ILA 0 • • y QQ = f 0 5 • ! yo • �N j%. • O ��oAQOQ+ _ , • , W • • m • • • q.�t '• h • 0 APA014E LANE rpTo To L* I o.1 v I Z'4 ABANDONED .A ' WELL % do sT 1988 SLURRY SEALING CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota TO: Kevin D. Frazell, Mendota Heights City Administrator FROM: Timothy J. Kuntz DATE: July 18, 1988 RE: Procedures for Granting a Planned Unit Development Section 1. INTRODUCTION. You have presented the following facts: a) the subject property is zoned R-1 One Family Residential; b the landowner proposes a planned unit development that contains a multi -family building; c) the City will be considering "preliminary plan approval" for the planned unit development; k d) the City's procedure for approval of a planned unit development is the granting of a conditional use permit; e) the City has complied statutory requirements conditional use permit; with all the ordinance and of notice and hearing for a f) under state law, a rezoning, requires a two-thirds vote. In the case of Mendota Heights, this means four of the five council members must vote in the affirmative; g) the granting of a conditional use permit requires a majority vote. Under this set of facts, you have asked whether the City has the authority to approve a planned unit development by a conditional use permit and without a rezoning of the underlying zoning district. The answer dictates whether a two-thirds majority vote or simple majority vote is required. Section 2. BACKGROUND TO CONCEPT. A planned unit development is a planning technique to allow mixed uses in an orderly, planned, and interrelated fashion. In Anderson, American Law of Zoning, 3rd Edition, Section 11.14, it is stated in part: Some commentators have noted that planned unit development encourages creative planning for land development. It is said that this type of control allows a developer to tailor the land use to the topographical and housing needs of the community. LAW OFFICES HAROLD LEVANDER ARTHUR GILLEN LeVanderGillen, Miller, Anderson & Kuntz ROGER C MILLER , HAROLD LEVANDER, JR. PAUL H ANDERSON 402 DROVERS BANK SLOG, 0 633 SOUTH CONCORD ST. * P O. BOX 298 TIMOTHY J. KUNTZ SOUTH ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55075-0298 0 TELEPHONE (612) 451-1831 DANIEL J BEESON ROLLIN H. CRAWFORD M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: Kevin D. Frazell, Mendota Heights City Administrator FROM: Timothy J. Kuntz DATE: July 18, 1988 RE: Procedures for Granting a Planned Unit Development Section 1. INTRODUCTION. You have presented the following facts: a) the subject property is zoned R-1 One Family Residential; b the landowner proposes a planned unit development that contains a multi -family building; c) the City will be considering "preliminary plan approval" for the planned unit development; k d) the City's procedure for approval of a planned unit development is the granting of a conditional use permit; e) the City has complied statutory requirements conditional use permit; with all the ordinance and of notice and hearing for a f) under state law, a rezoning, requires a two-thirds vote. In the case of Mendota Heights, this means four of the five council members must vote in the affirmative; g) the granting of a conditional use permit requires a majority vote. Under this set of facts, you have asked whether the City has the authority to approve a planned unit development by a conditional use permit and without a rezoning of the underlying zoning district. The answer dictates whether a two-thirds majority vote or simple majority vote is required. Section 2. BACKGROUND TO CONCEPT. A planned unit development is a planning technique to allow mixed uses in an orderly, planned, and interrelated fashion. In Anderson, American Law of Zoning, 3rd Edition, Section 11.14, it is stated in part: Some commentators have noted that planned unit development encourages creative planning for land development. It is said that this type of control allows a developer to tailor the land use to the topographical and housing needs of the community. One commentator said that planned unit development encourages physical development compatible with the environmental value of the area. Another noted that the type of development can be economic and efficient, reducing the cost of utilities and other services. Thus, planned unit development is intended to bring an element of flexibility into an otherwise rigid system of controls. This purpose has been widely approved in relation to special permits, vacancies, and other techniques. The objective of providing a variety of housing types at all economic levels seems not only to serve the public welfare but to be consistent with the policy of government at all levels. Section 3. OBJECTIVE OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. The concept of mixed uses is found in the Mendota Heights ordinances dealing with a planned unit development. City Code, Section 3.2 (99), defines a planned unit development as: A development which consists of two (2) or more principal structures or uses on a single parcel of land. City Code, Section 19.1, continues this concept and defines a planned unit development as: A. Planned Unit Development shall be defined as any project utilizing ten (10) or more acres of contiguous land wherein there is (a) more than one principal building per lot, or (b) more than one use per lot. Finally, City Code, Section 19.2 (6), indicates that it is the intent of a planned unit development to provide a means to allow substantial changes from the uses of the underlying zoning district, if the City imposed standards for a planned unit development are met. Unless such changes are incorporated in the City approved planned unit development, City Code, Section 19.2 (5), makes clear that the development regulations of the underlying zoning district govern. In any case, the residential density for the entire site cannot exceed the density permitted in the underlying zoning district. Section 4. MANNER OF GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. City Code, Section 19.1, makes clear that approval for a planned unit development shall occur by the granting of a conditional use permit. City Code, Section 3.2 (27), defines a conditional use permit as: A permit specially and individually granted for a conditional use in any district. -2- The form of the conditional use permit is the Final Development Plan and any agreements relating thereto. A rezoning is not mentioned. City Code, Section 6.1, lists the zoning districts in Mendota Heights. A planned unit development is not listed as a separate district. The structure of the Mendota Heights ZVuioq Ordinance is to grant a planned unit development as a conditional use permit and not as a rezoning. Thus, under the City Zoning Ordinance mixed uses not otherwise permitted in the underlying zoning district may be allowed without a rezoning, if, but only if, a conditional use permit for the planned unit development is granted. In the past, the City/ consistent with the structure of its ordinances, has, without rezoning but by a conditional use permit/ approved mixed residential uses in a planned unit development. ' Section 5. foIlmvs: STATEMENT OF ISSUE. The issue may be stated as May the City, by the granting a conditional use permit but without rezoning, approve a planned unit development that has oaea not otherwise expressly permitted in the underlying zoning diotZic�t? Based on the reasons which follow, the answer is yea. This answer has a supportive basis in: a) treatises; b) case law; o) statute. Section 5. TREATISES. Two respected treatises in the law of zoning are: Anderson, American Law Of Zoning, 3rd Edition Rathkopf, Law of Zoning Anderson (in Section 11.15 and 11.18 of his treatise) points out that a planned unit development may be created in at least two ways. One is by rezoning; the other is by conditional use permit. Both ways have received judicial approval. In the rezoning situation, the City first enacts an ordinance dealing with the general regulations and requirements for a planned unit development. Then, the City, in the second step, rezones a particular tract to a PUD District. -3- In the alternative procedure, the City does not rezone; rather, it uses the conditional use permitting device to regulate planned unit developments in any of the existing zoning districts. Some cities pick one method; some cities pick the other method. Rathkopf (in Section 63.02 of his treatise) points out that "in a number of cases, courts have held that, subject to specific conditional use regulations to the contrary, there is no restriction on the type of dwellings permitted in a PUD, regardless of the zoning restrictions in the district in which the PUD is located." Section 7. CASE LAW. In Chandler v. Kroiss, 291 Minn. 196, 190 N.W.2d 472 (1971), the Minnesota Supreme Court upheld the approval of a planned unit development by a conditional use permit. In Chandler, the property was zoned R-1, One Family Residences. The landowner, following the city ordinances, applied for a conditional use permit for a planned unit development that contained a multi -family dwelling. The City granted the conditional use permit. The Court upheld this procedure and stated: To the extent that the result of the proceeding for approval of a planned unit development thus alters the established, allowed land usages of the village, it has the same effect as would a succession of variances or rezonings. So long as procedures for securing a permit for a planned unit development fairly provide for airing the topic, and those before us have done so, we cannot say that the concept, as implemented, is impermissible. 190 N.W.2d at 476. It is interesting to note that this procedure, namely, a planned unit development by means of a conditional use permit, was sustained by the Court notwithstanding the statutory prohibition in Minn. Stat. 462.357, subd. 6, that a city "may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under the ordinance for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This statutory prohibition and the holding in Chandler can be reconciled by the fact that a conditional use is, by definition, an allowable use if but only if the standards for such use are met. Section 8. STATUTE. Finally, and most importantly, there is now a statute that authorizes a planned unit development by a conditional use permit. Minn. Stat. 462.3595, subds. 1 and 2, passed in 1982, provide: Subdivision 1. Authority. The governing body may by ordinance designate certain types of developments, including planned unit developments, and certain land development activities as conditional uses under zoning regulations. Conditional uses may be approved by the governing body or other designated authority by a showing by the applicant that the standards and criteria stated in the ordinance will be ZZ satisfied. The standards and criteria shall include both general requirements for all conditional uses, and insofar as practicable, requirements specific to each designated conditional use. Subdivision 2. Public Hearings. Public hearings on the granting of conditional use permits shall be held in the manner provided in Section 462.357, subd. 3. I believe that the above -quoted statute represents, in part, a legislative codification of the issues raised in Chandler. This statute explicitly allows a planned unit development by a conditional use permit; the statutorily mandated notice and hearing provisions "fairly provide for airing the topic" in that the statute incorporates the same notice and hearing requirements that one applicable to a rezoning, namely those found in Minn. Stat. 462.357, subd. 3. Section 9. CONCLUSION. The Mendota Heights procedure for granting a planned unit development by a conditional use permit, without a rezoning, is authorized by the Minn. Stat. 462.3595 and is supported by the other authorities cited in this memorandum. In granting such a permit, the City must follow the same notice and hearing requirements that are provided for a rezoning. Unless otherwise provided by ordinance, the granting of a conditional use permit requires only a majority vote of the Council. I have not been asked to review the notice and hearing procedures that were followed and, therefore, I express no opinion as to whether they meet the statutory requirements. TJK/Lu ID:2804K -5- INCORPORATED CONSULTING PLANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 300 FIRST AVENUE NORTH SUITE 210 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612.339.3300 MEMORANDUM DATE: 19 July 1988 TO: Mendota Heights City Council FROM: Howard Dahlgren, Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban, Inc. RE: Planned Unit Developments In the early days of the practice of land use zoning in this country and abroad, residential development took the form of each principal structure being placed on a separate lot. The larger proportion of development today continues to be handled in this way. Each zoning district prescribed minimum yard requirements (sometimes called setbacks) for the front, sides, and rear. Height, bulk, parking, percent of maximum land coverage (usually referred to as floor area ratio), and most importantly the amount of land required per unit was established for each such lot. Most communities developed several residential districts, each with a different amount of land area required per unit (usually referred to as density). During the post World War II era many residential developments were being accomplished as "projects" involving a group of buildings laid out on a single site, without each building having its own front, side, and rear lot lines. Thus, there evolved the technique of controlling such developments through the review of a plan known as a "Planned Unit Development" (PUD). The unit, of course, refers to housing units. The key element of such a plan is the allowance for flexibility in the placement of the units and the concentration of the units, but always in accordance with the underlying density prescribed by the zoning district applied to the land. The concept is most useful in providing flexibility to maintain part of a site as open space and concentrate the units in other areas of the land in question. An early and classic example of the success of this approach is the Ivy Falls Townhouses of Mendota Heights. In this case, a 7 acre park was conserved and dedicated to the City. The density of the overall land remained the same as single-family (the R-1 zone) and the townhouses were concentrated on the easterly Planned Unit Developments, 19 July 1988 Page 2 portion of the site. Thus, the procedure is not a rezoning. It is a means for providing a better solution as to desien, but entirely under the control of the City in the same way that a plat is subject to such control. A more recent example of a PUD done within the zoning district in which it is located is that of Summerset 19. Here the developers concentrated the development at the intersection of two major thoroughfares in the form of modified townhouses, with the retention of a large area of wetlands. The density remained the same as if they were single-family houses built on the entire site. The Planned Unit Development concept has been applied throughout the United States, and there are significant examples of its use in most of the Twin City suburban communities. It is a well understood and well used approach to provide a more flexible and imaginative solution to a site, frequently retaining significant open -space, much of which may be sensitive to the ecological environment. The use of a PUD procedure is an overlay control in the same way that the application of a preliminary plat is overlaid upon an R-1 zone for single-family development. The approval process and subsequent action on a preliminary plat is similar to that of a PUD. It is not a rezoning, but a method of proposing development allowing for different building arrangements, but conforming to the prescribed zoning density. This is the technique that is used throughout the United Stated and much of Europe. • C� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 13, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Lower Mississippi Watershed Management Organization Request for Feasibility Report Ivy Hills Park Reach (Tributary of Ivy Creek) DISCUSSION: At the Ivy Falls Creek informal public hearing on June 7, 1988, it was determined that the area suffering the most severe damage during the 1987 "super storm" was the Ivy Hill Park Reach. Other areas suffered less severe damage, or have since been repaired. Since the Ivy Hill Park Reach receives a significant amount of runoff from West St. Paul, any solution to the storm water problem should address this West St. Paul water runoff. The Lower Mississippi Water Management Organization is an ideal mechanism to use for studying this intercommunity storm water problem, so Council should consider requesting the water management organization to complete a feasibility report. This project was anticipated by Water Management Organization and costs for the report have already been estimated by Barr Engineering, the Board's Engineer. The estimated cost for doing the drainage study and feasibility report is $30,000. This cost will be financed initially by the WMO and then, after a cost distribution is determined, billed to the Cities. A cooperative agreement will probably then be prepared between West St. Paul and Mendota Heights to complete the project. The WMO has several higher priority projects that they are working on right now so this project would not be able to be studied until this winter. Council requested a creek tour before the July 19th meeting so I have made arrangements with Mr.' Jack Brassard, 1205 Sylvandale Road to conduct that tour at 6:00 P.M. before the Council meeting. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct the continued informal hearing and should Council desire to go forward with the first step of a public improvement and order a feasibility study they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 88- , RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION TO COMPLETE A FEASIBILITY STUDY ON THE IVY HILL PARK REACH. LIJ City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota gKol"IftsNot, RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION TO COMPLETE A FEASIBILITY STUDY ON THE IVY HILL PARK REACH WHEREAS, the Ivy Hill Park Reach of Ivy Falls Creek suffered signifi- cant storm water dai*nage during the July 1987 storm; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to perform a study of possible corrective actions; and WHEREAS, Mendota Height d West St. Paul contribute storm water to the tribubpry; and 9:c 15� WHEREAS, >viend ta Heights and West St. Paul are in the Lower Mississippi River Water Management Organization, an intercommunity organization created to address intercommunity storm water issues. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights hereby requests the Lower Mississippi River Water Management Organization to prepare a study of possible solutions to the storm water problems in Ivy Hill Park Reach of Ivy Falls Creek. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 19th day of July, 1988. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk 'Pop, CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS I By. Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 14, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson 4 Public Works Director SUBJECT: Pabst Addition Final Plat DISCUSSION: ; Attached is the Pabst Addition final plat. Staff has reviewed the plat and finds that it conforms to the preliminary plat as approved. t RECOMMENDATION: f : Subject to Dakota County concurrence staff recommends approval of the fin al plat as submitted. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should pass a motion approving Resolution No. 88- RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR PABST ADDITION. r a City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR PABST ADDITION WHEREAS, a final plat for Pabst Addition has been submitted to the Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said final plat. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the final plat of Pabst Addition submitted at this meeting be and the same is hereby approved. 2. That the appropriate City officials be and they are hereby author- ized to execute the final plat on behalf of the City of Mendota Heights. i Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 19th day of July, 1988. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor Page 1 July 12, 1988 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 12, 1988 The regular meeting of the Parks & Recreation Commission, City of Mendota, was held at 7:00 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Chairman Stein called the meeting to order at 7:00 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Chairman Stein, members Huber and Leffert. Member Owens had notified the Commission he would be absent, and members Damberg, Lachenmayer, and Katz were also absent. Public Works Director Danielson was also present. HOCKEY FENCES Bids for adding a chain link fence to the Friendly FRIENDLY HILLS PARK Hills Hockey rink were reviewed and not acted on because of the lack of a quorum. BIKE TRAIL THROUGH Jim Danielson presented the bike trail plans for FRIENDLY HILLS extention through Friendly Hills Park to the Com- mission. It was the concensus of the members pre- sent that the bike trail would be a good addition, providing more direct access for the Friendly Hills neighborhood to the Mendota Heights Road bike trail. PARK SURVEY UPDATE John Huber gave the Commission an update on the progress of the committee that is preparing a park survey to be sent to the residents to solicit input on what park facilities are needed. Commissioner Stein pointed out that the City has already hired Barton-Aschman to tell us what park facilities are needed. He feels we should be educating residents on what is needed not asking them. 1989 BUDGET REVIEW The 1989 budget was discussed and the Commission did not have any specific budget requests. They felt Mend -Eagan and City staff had done a good job handling recreation needs this year. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 P.M. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 13, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Street Light Assessment Hearing Job No. 8624 Improvement No. 86, Project No. 11 DISCUSSION: Attached is a proposed assessment roll for the Business Park Street Lighting project. Assessment rates were reduced by about 507. from the feasibility report by utilization of Tax Increment Financing and M.S.A. funding. To distribute the assessments equitably staff established a new assessment formula using both the frontage and area to calculate a contribution: Percent of Contribution = Lot Frontage X Lot Area Total Sum of Frontage X Area RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the attached assessment roll be approved and an assessment hearing be called. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 88- , RESOLUTION CALLING FOR HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT STREET LIGHTING TO SERVE MENDOTA HEIGHTS INDUSTRIAL/BUSINESS PARK, CAREW BUSINESS CENTER, INLAND INDUSTRIAL PARK, MEDALLION INDUSTRIAL PARK, YORKTON CENTRE POINTE SOUTH AND NORTHLAND PLAZA (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 11). City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION CALLING FOR HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT STREET LIGHTING TO SERVE MENDOTA HEIGHTS INDUSTRIAL/BUSINESS PARK, CAREW BUSINESS CENTER, INLAND INDUSTRIAL PARK, MEDALLION INDUSTRIAL PARK, YORKTON CENTRE POINT SOUTH AND NORTHLAND PLAZA (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 11) WHEREAS, contracts have heretofore been let for the construction of the following described improvements: The construction of commercial district street lighting to serve Mendota Heights Industrial/Business Park, Carew Business Center, Inland Industrial Park, Medallion Industrial Park, Yorkton Centre Pointe South and Northland Plaza (which improvements have heretofore been known and designated as -Improvement No. 86, Project No. 11) and WHEREAS, the construction of said improvements has been completed; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the aid and assistance of the Public Works Direc- tor, was previously directed by the City Council to prepare the assessment roll for the above described improvements; and . WHEREAS, the City Clerk has notified the City Council that a proposed assessment roll for the above described improvements has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That a public hearing on said proposed assessment roll shall be held at the Mendota Heights City Hall at 750 South Plaza Drive, in the City of Mendota Heights, on Tuesday, August 16, 1988, at 8:15 o'clock P.M. or as soon as possible thereafter. 2. That the City Clerk, with the aid and assistance of the City Attorney, is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and attend to the publication and mailing of the necessary notices of said hearing, all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 19th day of July, 1988. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk ASQES`'MEmT PrRInD Street Lights - 10 years Interest Rate - 8% PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND NO. DESCRIPTION 27-03300- Stuart Lloyd Company 060-78 1455 Mendota Heights Rd. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ASSESSMENT ROLL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT STREET LIGHTS X108 NO. 8624 IMP. NO. 86-11 ADOPTED: SUBDIVISION Pt. of Govt Lot 2 com SE Corner Sec 33 N 1320 Ft. W 660 Ft. to Beg N 255.95 Ft. N 68D 67M 30S W 481.25 ft. E R/W STH #13 S 21D 52M 30S W on R/W 217.60 Ft. Cont R/W 63.81 Zone S to Cen Line Men Hgts Rd SE on Cen Line 587.09 Ft. to Beg Sub j to Rd E 60 f t . LOT BLK STREET NO. NO. LIGHTS -- -- $4,062.99 27-03300- Richard L. & Patricia Schaak N 430 Ft. of S 1750 Ft. of E 660 -- -- $5,266.60 070-78 %Specialty Equip. Co., Inc. Ft. of Govt Lot 1 & 2 Ex S 40 Ft. 1415 Mendota Heights Road Section 33. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 27-03300- Textron, Inc. N 330 Ft. of S. 1320 Ft of E 660 -- -- $3,190.43 020-79 c/o Cherry -Textron -L Ragan Ft. of E 660 Ft. of Govt. Lot 1 & 1224 Warner Avenue E 2 Ex N 40 Ft. to Village, Sec. 33 Santa Ana, CA 92707 27-03400- Northland Land Company S 518.6 ft of N 884 ft of W 420 -- -- $3,271.13 011-50 3500 80th Street W ft of NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 Ex Pt Minneapolis, MN 55431 Platted Southridge Business Center Section 34 27-03400- State of Minnesota Com at SW Cor of SE 1/4 of SE 1/4 -- -- $612.73 011-75 1560 Highway 55 N 19D 45M W 700 ft E & Parr with Hastings, MN 55033 S Line 62 Ft to CMSTP&P R/W SE on R/W to S Line W 217.4 ft. to Beg Ex Parcel 27-03400-012-75, Sec. 34 27-03400- Vincent J. Kennedy 010-77 1415 Lone Oak Road Eagan, MN 55121 Pt of NW 1/4 of SE 1/4 Com 776 ft N of SE Cor SW on S Line Rogers St 653 ft SE on R/W Hgwy 381.5 ft to N Line Men Hghts Rd E on Men Hghts Rd 313.22 ft to E line NW 1/4 of SE 1/4 N 425.1 ft to Beg Ex Pt Hgwy, Section 34, -- -- $797.41 TOTAL $4,062.99 $5,266.60 $3,190.43 $3,271.13 $612.73 $797.41 PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND NO. DESCRIPTION 27-03400- Stanley Sell 013-78 1415 Lone Oak Road Eagan, MN 55121 27-16300- CMS Pilot Knob Associates 010-01 13035 Ridgedale Drive Minnetonka, MN 5.5343 27-16300- CMS Pilot Knob Associates 020-01 13035 Ridgedale Drive Minnetonka, MN 55343 27-16300- CMS Pilot Knob Associates 030-01 13035 Ridgedale Drive Minnetonka, MN 55343 27-16300- CMS Pilot Knob Associates 040-01 13035 Ridgedale Drive Minnetonka, MN 55343 27-16300- Sidal Realty Company 010-02 2200 Blaisdell Avenue So. Minneapolis, MN 55404 27-16300- Sidal Realty Company 020-02 2200 Blaisdell Avenue So. Minneapolis, MN 55404 27-16300- Sidal Realty Company 030-02 2200 Blaisdell Avenue So. Minneapolis, MN 55404 SUBDIVISION LOT BLK STREET NO. NO. LIGHTS -- -- $1,018.37 All E of RR of S 1/2 of SE 1/4 Ex Pt taken for Hgwy Purposes Ex Pt N & W of L Com NE Cor W 991.87 Ft to Beg of L S 43D 48M 04 E 38.29 Ft to NW Cor MDOT Prop Cont S 43D 48M 04S E Al SD Prop 609.59 Ft S 87D 12M 30S W Al SD Prop 500.39 Ft Cur L SW 172.92 Ft to E R/W SH 55 & There Term Ex Par 216B STH R/W Plat No 19.42 Con 0.58 Acs Ex Parcels 27-03400-014-78 & 015-78, Section 34 Carew Business Center Carew Business Center Carew Business Center Carew Business Center Carew Business Center Carew Business Center Carew Business Center 1 1 $895.85 2 1 $893.74 3 1 $1,291.18 4 1 $888.56 1 2 $3,305.56 2 2 $3,310.67 3 2 $3,317.51 TOTAL $1,018.37 $895.85 $893.74 $1,291.18 $888.56 $3,305.56 $3,310.67 $3,317.51 PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND NO. DESCRIPTION 27-36450- Cray Research 010-00 608 Second Ave., 12th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55402 27-36450- Theodore Tst Kuller 010-01 1800 Conwed Tower St. Paul, MN 55101 27-36450- Circle Airfreight Company 021-01 260 Townsend Street Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-36450- Robert & Mary Tousignant 022-01 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 SUBDIVISION Inland Industrial Park Inland Industrial Park LOT BLK STREET NO. NO. LIGHTS Inland Industrial Park Lot 2, Blk 1, ex Pt lying N of Line & It's E Ext Com most N Cor SW on NW Line 250 ft to Beg of Line S 60D 52M 37S E 192 ft S 84D 49M 24S E 162.92 ft to SE Line & There Term. Inland Industrial Park Pt of Lot 2, Blk 1 lying N of Line & It's E Ext Com Most N Cor SW -on NW Line 250 ft to beg of Line S 60D 52M 37S E 192 ft S 84D 49M 24S E 162.92 ft to SE Line & There Terminating A -- $5,336.69 1 1 $3,267.27 2 1 $543.13 2 1 $859.13 27-36450- Cray Research, Inc. Inland Industrial Park 3 030-01 608 Second Ave. 12th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55402 27-36450- Cray Research, Inc. Inland Industrial Park 040-01 608 Second Ave. 12th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55402 27-36450- Northland Drive Partnership. Inland Industrial Park 010-02 2510 Northland Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 27-44800- Mildred Cronen LeMays Addition 101-00 205 Holly Lane Pt of Lot 10 Com S Line L.109.22 Plymouth, MN 55447 ft E of NW Cor SW1/4 of SE1/4 "34-28-23 R 90D 255.18 ft R 39D 47M 261.55 ft to SW R/W RR NW on R/W to Pt 125 ft NW of Its Int with N & S Line Sec 34 due S to S Line E to Beg 1 $3,302.26 4 1 $3,184.33 1 2 $3,641.14 10 -- $3,212.80 TOTAL $5,336.69 $3,267.27 $543.13 $859.13 $3,302.26 $3,184.33 $3,641.14 $3,212.80 PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND NO. DESCRIPTION 27-44800- Tempco Manufacturing Co. 102-00 2475 Highway 55 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 27-48200- City of Mendota Heights 010-01 750 S. Plaza Drive 2 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 27-48200- Ind. School Dist.4197 020-01 1037 Bidwell Street 1 2 West St. Paul, MN 55118 27-48200- GGHF, Inc: 030-01 900 Southgate Office Plaza 5001 80th Street West Minneapolis, MN 55437 27-48200- Karl F. & Teresa Esslinger 040-01 632 Callahan Place Mendota Heights, MN 55118 27-48200- Ryan Properties, Inc. 010-02 900 2nd Avenue South, #700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 27-48200- Ryan Properties, Inc. 020-02 900 2nd Avenue South, #700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 27-48200- Ryan Properties, Inc. 030-02 900 2nd Avenue South, #700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 SUBDIVISION LOT BLK STREET NO. NO. LIGHTS LeMays Addition 10 -- $5,476.98 Lot 10 Ex Pt to Vill Ex Com S Line L109.22 ft E of NW Cor SW1/4 of SE1/4 34-28-23 R 90D 255.18 ft R 39D 47M 261.55 ft to SW R/W RR NW on R/W to Pt 125 ft NW of its Int with N & S Line Sec 34-28-23 Due S to S Line E to Beg Ex Pt lying SE of S R/w Men Hgts Rd & SW of W R/W CMSTP&P RR & N of Lot 1, Blk 5, Men Hgts Ind Pk. Medallion Industrial Park Medallion Industrial Park Medallion Industrial Park Medallion Industrial Park Medallion Industrial Park Lot 1, Blk 2 Ex Part in Parcel 24A of STH R/W Plat No. 19-37 Medallion Industrial Park Medallion Industrial Park 1 1 $5,669.28 2 1 $3,483.44 3 1 $2,354.87 4 1 $1,437.60 1 2 $3,881.36 2 2 $4,114.99 3 2 $2,852.36 TOTAL $5,476.98 $5,669.28 $3,483.44 $2,354.87 $1,437.60 $3,881.36 $4,114.99 $2,852.36 PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND NO. DESCRIPTION 27-48200- Ryan Properties, Inc. 040-02 900 2nd Avenue South, #700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 27-48200- Ryan Properties, Inc. 050-02 900 2nd Avenue South, #700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 27-48250- Teachers Retirement System 010-01 9700 West Bryn Mawr Rosemount, IL 60018 27-48250- Teachers Retirement System 020-01 9700 West Bryn Mawr Rosemount, IL 60018 27-48250- Teachers Retirement System 030-01 9700 West Bryn Mawr Rosemount, IL 60018 27-48251- Teachers Retirement System 010-01 9700 West Bryn Mawr Rosemount, IL 60018 27-48251- Teachers Retirement System 020-01 9700 West Bryn Mawr Rosemount, IL 60018 27-48251- Teachers Retirement System 030-01 9700 West Bryn Mawr Rosemount, IL 60018 27-48300- Leo Partnership 011-01 %Simonson Realty, Inc. 686 92nd Street W. Bloomington, MN 55420 27-48300- Jeffery A. Carlson 012-01 2418 Transport Road Mendota Heights, MN 55120 SUBDIVISION Medallion Industrial Park Medallion Industrial Park Lot 5, Blk 2 Ex Part in Parcel 24A of STH R/W Plat No. 19-37 Mendota Heights Business Center Mendota Heights Business Center Mendota Heights Business Center Mendota Heights Business Center 2nd Addition Mendota Heights Business Center 2nd Addition Mendota Heights Business Center 2nd Addition Mendota Heights Industrial Park Pt of Lot 1, Blk 1 lying E of Line Beg S Line 205 ft E of SW Cor as Meas along S Line N at RA to N Line & There Term. Mendota Heights Industrial Park Pt of Lot 1, Blk 1 lying W of Line Beg S Line 205 ft E of SW Cor as Meas along S Line N at RA to N Line & There Term. LOT BLK STREET TOTAL NO. NO. LIGHTS 4 2 $3,428.93 $3,428.93 5 2 $3,733.71 $3,733.71 1 1 $5,523.47 $5,523.47 2 1 $849.88 $849.88 3 1 $1,814.04 $1,814.04 1 1 $1,978.88 . $1,978.88 2 1 $2,043.67 $2,043.67 3 1 $2,030.12 $2,030.12 1 1 $473.79 $473.79 2 1 $759.69 $759.69 PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND NO. DESCRIPTION 27-48300- Northland Land Company 020-01 3500 80th Street West Minneapolis, MN 55431 27-48300- Northland Land Company 030-01 3500 80th Street West Minneapolis, MN 55431 27-48300- R.L. Johnson Inv. Co. 040-01 701 Decatur Ave. N, #107 Golden Valley, MN 55427 27-48300- R.L. Johnson Inv. Co. 050-01 701 Decatur Ave. N, #107 Golden Valley, MN: 55427 27-48300- Northland Land Company 060-01 3500 80th Street West Minneapolis, MN 55431 27-48300- Northland Land Company 071-01 3500 80th Street West Minneapolis, MN 55431 27-48300- R.L. Johnson Inv. Co. 072-01 701 Decatur Ave. N, #107 Golden Valley, MN 55427 27-48300- Richard B. Shaller 030-02 1335 Mendota Heights Road $1,374.54 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 27-48300- Inv Co I 072-02 625 4th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55415 27-48300- Inv Co I 080-02 625 4th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55415 SUBDIVISION Mendota Heights Industrial Park Mendota Heights Industrial Park Mendota Heights Industrial Park Mendota Heights Industrial Park Mendota Heights Industrial Park Mendota Heights Industrial Park Lot 7, Blok 1 Ex Pt lying N of E Ext of S Line of Lot 5 to E Line of Lot 7, Block 1. Mendota Heights Industrial Park Pt of Lot 7, Blk 1 Lying N of E Ext of S Line of Lot 5 to E Line of Lot 7, Block 1. Mendota Heights Industrial Park Mendota Heights Industrial Park W 116.9 ft f o Lot 7 Mendota Heights Industrial Park LOT BLK STREET TOTAL NO. NO. LIGHTS 2 1 $2,306.15 $2,309.15 3 1 $1,425.41 $1,429.41 4 1 $1,483.30 $1,488.30 5 1 $1,609.27 $1,615.27 6 1 $4,171.85 $4,178.85 7 1 $4,672.97 $4,680.97 7 1 $2,323.93 $2,331.93 3 2 $2,393.71 $2,398.71 7 2 $1,365.54 $1,374.54 8 2 $651.53 $661.53 PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK STREET TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. LIGHTS 27-48300- Continental Telephone Corp. Mendota Heights Industrial Park 1 4 $1,303.80 $1,308.80 010-04 Box 50770 St. Paul, MN 55150 27-48300- Continental Telephone Corp. Mendota Heights Industrial Park 2 4 $1,021.90 $1,027.90 020-04 Box 50770 St. Paul, MN 55150 27-48300- Northland Land Company Mendota Heights Industrial Park 3 4 $1,021.90 $1,028.90 030-04 3500 80th Street W Minneapolis, MN 55431 27-48300- Northland Land Company Mendota Heights Industrial Park 4 4 $1,021.90 $1,029.90 040-04 3500 80th Street W Minneapolis, MN 55431 27-48300- Northland Land Company Mendota' Heights Industrial Park 5 4 $1,303.80 $1,312.80 050-04 3500 80th Street W Minneapolis, MN 55431 27-48300- Northland Land Company Mendota Heights Industrial Park 6 4 $1,304.52 $1,314.52 060-04 3500 80th Street W Minneapolis, MN 55431 27-48300- Northland Land Company Mendota Heights Industrial Park 7 4 $1,021.90 $1,032.90 070-04 3500 80th Street W Minneapolis, MN 55431 27-48300- Northland Land Company Mendota Heights Industrial Park 8 4 $1,021.90 $1,033.90 080-04 3500 80th Street W Minneapolis, MN 55431 27-48300- Northland Land Company Mendota Heights Industrial Park 9 4 $1,021.90 $1,034.90 090-04 % United Properties 3500 80th Street W #100 Minneapolis, MN 55431 27-48300- Northland Land Company Mendota Heights Industrial Park 10 4 $1,303.80 $1,317.80 100-04 % United Properties 3500 80th Street W #100 Minneapolis, MN 55431 PARCEL NO. 27-48300- 010-05 27-48300- 020-05 27-48300- 010-06 27-48300- 021-06 27-48300- 031-06 27-48300- 040-06 27-48300- 050-06 27-48300- 060-06 27-48300- 070-06 REPUTED OWNER AND DESCRIPTION Northland Land Company 3500 80th Street W Minneapolis, MN 55431 Northland Land Company 3500 80th Street W Minneapolis, MN 55431 Northland Land Company 3500 80th Street W Minneapolis, MN 55431 Essex House Condo Corp. %Marriott Corp. Marriott Drive Washington, D.C. 20058 Northland Land Company 3500 80th Street W Minneapolis, MN 55431 Northland Land Company 3500 80th Street W Minneapolis, MN 55431 Northland Land Company 3500 80th Street W Minneapolis, MN 55431 Northland Land Company 3500 80th Street W Minneapolis, MN 55431 Northland Land Company 3500 80th Street W Minneapolis, MN 55431 SUBDIVISION Mendota Heights Industrial Park Mendota Heights Industrial Park Mendota Heights Industrial Park Lot 1, Blk 6 Ex Pt in Parcel 215 of STH R/W Plat No. 19-33 Mendota Heights Industrial Park Lot 2, Blk 6 W'ly 72.8 Ft Lot 3, Blk 6 Ex Pt in Parcel 215 of STH R/W Plat No. 19-33 Mendota Heights Industrial Park Lot 3 Blk 6 Ex W'ly 72.8 ft Ex Pt in Parcel 215 of STH R/W Plat No. 19-33 Mendota Heights Industrial Park Mendota Heights Industrial Park Mendota Heights Industrial Park Mendota Heights Industrial Park Lot 7, Blk 6 Ex Pt in Parcel 215 of STH R/W Plat No. 19-33 LOT BLK STREET TOTAL NO. NO. LIGHTS 1 5 $2,557.50 $2,563.50 2 5 $8,443.22 $8,450.22 1 6 $2,905.83 $2,912.83 2 6 $3,141.21 $3,149.21 3 6 $7,653.86 $7,662.86 4 6 $9,870.21 $9,880.21 5 6 $9,614.34 $9,625.34 6 6 $3,636.51 $3,648.51 7 6 $2,632.95 $2,645.95 REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK STREET TOTAL kP•ARCEL M. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. LIGHTS 27-52250- G. & L. Properties Northland Plaza 1 1 $1,894.59 $1,896.59 010-01 1106 170th Street West Farmington, MN 55024 27-52250- G. & L. Properties Northland Plaza 2 1 $2,672.10 $2,675.10 020-01 1106 170th Street West Farmington, MN 55024 27-52250- G. & L. Properties Northland Plaza 3 1 $571.29 $575.29 030-01 1106 170th Street West Farmington, MN 55024 27-52250- G. & L. Properties Northland Plaza 4 1 $630.12 $635.12 040-01 1106 170th Street West Farmington, MN 55024 27-52250- G. & L. Properties Northland Plaza 1 2 $1,175.95 $1,178.95 010-02 1106 170th Street West Farmington, MN 55024 27-52250- G. & L. Properties Northland Plaza 2 2 $504.36 $508.36 020-02 1106 170th Street West Farmington, MN 55024 27-52250- G. & L. Properties Northland Plaza 3 2 $545.83 $550.83 030-02 1106 170th Street West Farmington, MN 55024 27-71285- TNC Southridge Corp. Southridge Business Center 1 1 $4,152.17 $4,154.17 010-01 c/o Northland Land Company 3500 80th Street W Bloomington, MN 55431 27-71285- Northland Land Company Southridge Business Center 2 1 $4,814.11 $4,817.11 020-01 3500 80th Street W Bloomington, MN 55431 27-71285- Northland Land Company Southridge Business Center 3 1 $2,652.70 $2,656.70 030-01 3500 80th Street W Bloomington, MN 55431 PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND NO. DESCRIPTION 27-88100- Centre Pointe South Assoc. 010-01 1690 University Avenue #180 St. Paul, MN 55104 27-88100- Centre Pointe South Assoc. 020-01 1690 University Avenue #180 St. Paul, MN 55104 27-88100- Centre Pointe South Assoc. 030-01 1690 University Avenue #180 St. Paul, MN 55104 27-88100- Centre Pointe South Assoc. 040-01 1690 University Avenue #180 St. Paul, MN 55104 27-88100- Centre Pointe South Assoc. 050-01 1690 University Avenue #180 St. Paul, MN 55104 27-88100- Centre Pointe South Assoc. 060-01 1690 University Avenue #180 St. Paul, MN 55104 27-88100- Centre Pointe South Assoc. 010-02 1690 University Avenue #180 St. Paul, MN 55104 27-88100- Centre Pointe South Assoc. 020-02 1690 University Avenue #180 St. Paul, MN 55104 SUBDIVISION Yorkton Centre Pointe South Yorkton Centre Pointe South Yorkton Centre Pointe South Yorkton Centre Pointe South Yorkton Centre Pointe South Yorkton Centre Pointe South Yorkton Centre Pointe South Yorkton Centre Pointe South LOT BLK STREET TOTAL NO. NO. LIGHTS 1 1 $1,930.74 $1,932.74 2 1 $1,916.62 $1,919.62 3 1 $1,916.62 $1,920.62 4 1 $784.30 $789.30 5 1 $4,457.78 $4,463.78 6 1 $3,112.51 $3,119.51 1 2 $7,822.94 $7,825.94 2 2 $1,701.14 $1,705.14 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 13; 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City / �ti�or FROM: James E. Danielson ✓ Public Works Director SUBJECT: Seal Coating for 1988 DISCUSSION: The City budgeted $50,000 for seal coating this year and staff to allocate spending it in three different ways: proposes 1. Seal Coat - Staff proposes to seal coat the Curley Addition and Tilsen Highland Heights neighborhoods with the standard "buckshot" applica- tion (see map). Estimated cost is $20,000. 2. Slurry Seal - The Apache Court and Apache Lane streets in Dela- ware Crossing are structurally sound but have badly eroded surfaces. Staff is investigating sealing these streets with a slurry seal (a very thin overlay). No one in the Twin Cities area has the equipment to do this, however a Wisconsin contractor will be in town later this month to apply a slurry seal at the airport and we are discussing with him the possibility of doing our streets at the same time. Estimated cost is $10,000. 3. Overlay - The blacktop surface at the "backlot" of the Public Works Garage that is used for storage has failed. We propose to overlay that lot and expand it by 30 feet. Estimated cost is $10,000. 4. The remaining $10,000 will be used to patch the streets in the seal coated areas, pay for City Engineering assistance and as a contingency. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council approve the Seal Coat plans and specifications this evening and order bids. f ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should pass a motion to approve the plans and specifications and authorize staff to advertise for bit and to receive the bids at 9:30 A.M., Monday, August 1, 1988. 1 OAD 1• • • • • • • • • •. • a AVE UE • • • • • • z • PAR • '0 ~ J • • • • • !• " • J O • to • • i . ' --•MARIE- AVENU • co • 1938 SEAL COATING 42,772 SQ. YDS. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota •,��.� • • • "i ' MAYFIELD HG S.L • • 1• • • • • • • • • •. • a AVE UE • • • • • • z • PAR • '0 ~ J • • • • • !• " • J O • to • • i . ' --•MARIE- AVENU • co • 1938 SEAL COATING 42,772 SQ. YDS. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota Kr -Ty- , - • • GI Ty • VICTORIA • /% �- _KJALL iUj f�-- j • CTS • • I NTE. ORP i 1983 SEAL COATING j 24,025 SQ. YDS. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 14, 1988 1 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets Copperfield IV Job No. 8808 Improvement No. 88, Project No. 2 DISCUSSION: Mr. Dick Putnam has petitioned.the City to provide public improve- ments to the proposed Copperfield IV subdivision. In order to do so, a feasibility report and preparation of plans and specifications are; necessary. Given the small size and ease of serving this project, and considering the developer is very concerned about completing the project this construction season, it would be reasonable to complete the feasibility report, and plans and specifications simultaneously. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that Council order staff to begin the preparation of a feasibility report and plans and specifications for Copperfield IV.', ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with the staff recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 88- , RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR COPPERFIELD IV. 4 City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR COPPERFIELD IV i WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the City Council requesting sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water and street improvements to serve Copperfield IV and adjacent areas. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the above described petition be and is hereby accepted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights. 2. That the City Engineer be and is hereby authorized and dir- ected to prepare a feasibility study as to whether said proposed im- provements are feasible, whether said improvements should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and as to the estimated cost of said improvement. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 19th day of July, 1988. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA DOCUMENT 0702 PAGE ONE OF PAGES TO (Owner): CITY OF MEnOTA HEIGHTS PROJECT: New City Hall Building APPLICATION NO: 6 Distribution to: 750 South Plaza Drive Lexington & State Hwy 110 PERIOD ❑ FROM: 0 OWNER Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Mendota Heights, MN [X ARCHITECT TO: 0 CONTRACTOR ATTENTION: CONTRACT FOR: Mechanical ARCHITECT'S Construction PROJECT NO: CONTRACT DATE: November 10, 1987 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached. CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous months by Owner TOTAL ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Approved this Month Number Date Approved TOTALS Net change by Change Orders The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Docu- ments, that all amounts have been paid by him for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. 0 -ft CONT7OR: T*,0Y MACHANICAL, INC. C By: Z&Cli Date: 6-17-88 --ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site obser- vations and the data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that the Work has progressed to the point indicated; that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Docu- ments; and that the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. The present status of the account for this Contract is as follows: ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM ....................... $ 287,447.00 Net change by Change Orders ..................... $ -(2'9()0. Z.- 'r-0 CONTRACT SUM TO DATE ........................ $ 284,547.00 TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE ........... $ (Column G on G703) RETAINAGE 5 0/6 .................. ; ...... or total in Column I on G703 TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE .................. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT ....... $ 162,625.-75 lGb-ZCf­*:F CURRENT PAYMENT DUE ......................... 44—,700-.-00 7_91, IULA-�:- State of: Minnesota County of: Anoka Subscribed and sworn to before me this 164W".Qqune 1988 Notary Publi 6A'A 4qW*X9D ,N94 u -"'T', 4tr" ' T _ '. m -71 aimMM N e i er from t My Commis X 's: -MINNESOTA NOTARY PUBLIC ANOKAU(JUNI T MyqRTT�x� Explr" 7454* SO AMOUNT C QW (Attachvxplan gon s from the amount applied for.) ARCHITECT (L /A)i C. By. Date: �6 j�� This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. AIA DOCUMENT G702 I APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT * APRIL 1978 EDITION , AIAO * (D 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 f_G702-7978 CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMENT 6703 Page 2 OF 2 AIA Document 6702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, APPLICATION NUMBER: 6 containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. APPLICATION DATE: 6-17-88 In tabulations below,amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. PERIOD TO: 6-30-88 Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: # 2878 -Mendota Heights City Hall Lindberg Pierce, Inc. Architects A B C D E F 6 ,H I ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED WORK COMPLETED MATERIALS TOTAL BALANCE RETAINAGE NO VALUE FROM PREVIOUSTHIS PERIOD PRESENTLY COMPLETED X TO FINISH APPLICATION STORED AND STORED (61C) (C-6) (D+E) (NOT IN TO DATE 5% 0.00 D OR E) (D+E+F) 0.00 0.0% 1. BOND 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 21500.00 100.0% 0.00 125.00 2. 15010 -GENERAL PROVISIONS 2,361.00 21361.00 0.00 0.00 21361.00 100.0% 0.00 118.05 3. 15160-AIRIWTR TEST/BALANCE 1,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 1,250.00 0.00 4. 15180 -MECH SYS INSULATION 12,940.00 91940.00 0.00 0.00 91940.00 76.8% 3,000.00 497.00 5. 15400 -PLUMBING, MATERIAL 24,000.00 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 62.5% 9,000.00 750.00 6. , LABOR 20,000.00 18,200.00 0.00 0.00 18,200.00 91.0% 1,800.00 910.00 7. 15400 -OUTSIDE UTILIIIES 15,334.00 15,334.00 0.00 0.00 15,334.00 100.0% 0.00 766.70 8. 15480 -LAWN IRRIGATION SYS 6,362.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 15.7% 5,362.00 50.00 9. 15500 -A ffOMAT SPRINK. SYS 26,700.00 4,000.00 8,000.00 0.00 12,000.00 44.9% 14,700.00 600.00 10. 15700 -LIQUID HEAT TRANSFER - MATERIAL 28,000.00 222,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 27,000.00 96.4% 1,000.00 11350.00 11. 15700 - - LABOR 14,000.00 11,000.00 11000.00 0.00 12,000.00 85.7% 2,000.00 600.00 12. 15800 -AIR DISTRIBUTION - MATERIAL 93,000.00 55,750.00 12,000.00 0.00 67,750.00 72.8% 25,250.00 3,387.50 13. 15800 - " - LABOR 19,000.00 16,500.00 0.00 0.00 16,500.00 86.8% 2,500.00 825.00 14. 15850-AUTDMAT TEMP CONTROL 22,000.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 2.3% 21,500.00 i 25.00 15. C.O. Y 1 - TO OFFSET ITEM #17 (2,850.00) (2,850.00) 0.00 0.00 (21850.00)100.0% 0.00 (142.50) (-50:00)---(50.00}--0;-O0--0i00-(50. 00) too. 0% Or 00 {2, 50)_ TOTALS -284,-547;00- -171,185:00 21, 000.00 Z�tjaC�q-4 a0 19-%,235.w 5,000.00 4971-185.00 69.3% 87,362.00 -9f859. -25 - Cl -4, 2-15 00 q.ejtvl •-ir, J i APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA DOCUMENT 0702 (instructions on reverse side) WA O�4 a acts TO (OWNER): CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PROJECT` MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY HALL APPLICATION NO: —05_ Distribution to: MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN ❑ OWNER PERIODTO: 6-15-88 ❑ARCJIIT[CT ❑ CONTRACTOR FROM (CONTRACTOR): ' ' THOMAS ELECTRIC INC. VIA (ARCI IITECT):LINDBERG PIERCE INC. ARCHITECT'S ❑ r Suite 710 PROJECT NO: ❑ 600 1st. Ave. No. CONTRACT FOR: ELECTRICAL ,. Minneapolis, MN 55403 CONTRACT DATE: f Application Is made4oT Payment; as shown below, in connection with the Contract. CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Continuation sheet, AIA Document G703, Is attached. CI IANGF 0k0f R SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous months by Owner TOTAL ADDITIONS $2078.00 DEDUCTIONS $950.00 Approved this Month S 153.708.00 4. TOTAL COMPLEIED At STORED TO OAIE............ Nunibcr Date Approved S. RETAINAGE: TOTALS a. 5 % of Completed Work $-H-5$:-692,200" (Column D t E on G703) Net titan e by Change Olders S1128.00 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM ....................... S 152.580.00 2. Net change by Change Orders ....... ...... ..:..... S 1.128.00 3. CONTRACT SUM T6 -DATE (Line 1 t2) .............. S 153.708.00 4. TOTAL COMPLEIED At STORED TO OAIE............ i i..9 26_=62 S r0 (Column G on G703) S. RETAINAGE: a. 5 % of Completed Work $-H-5$:-692,200" (Column D t E on G703) b. % of Stored Material $ (Column F on G703) Total Retainage (Line 5s#Sb or - Total In Column I of G703) ..................... S 5'Soo'c 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE ................... s-+-,,-1, - t; at The ulndersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knciwledge, (Line 4 less Line S Total) intotmation and belief the Work covered by thii Application for Payment has been 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR completed in accordance with the Clntract Documents. that all amounts have been PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate)......... S 85 981.00 pald by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates fur Payment were 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE .......................... $ issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown 9, BALANCE TO FINISH,PLUS RETAINAGE ............. ' � � `clwe _ v herein is now due. S ���""""'"1 {Line 3 less Line 6) CONTRACTOR: THOMAS ELECTRIC INC. State of: MINNESOTA SEX..,, d. - Subscribed and sworn to before metrktft �' ,19 88 I� n , Bata Notary Public: Q�,1c./ Blue Earth County By: '"� ''� �' !)ate: -June r 20. 1988 My Cnmmisslon expires: My Comm. Exp. &992 AMOUNTCERTIFIED ...................::........... $ ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT 18-� (Attach expltna ion i! amount certified differs from the amount applied fool In accordance with the Contract Docurnents, based on on-site observations and the ARCI LITE .t! data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to Ilse test of the Architect's knowledge, Information and belief the Work Inas progressed as By; —Date; — Zog��j4xr indicated, the quality of the Wos It is in accordance with the Cpntract Dcxuments, and T1tis Certificate Is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is* payable only to the the Cuotrattor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CEK1111ED• Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. A"00CUWNTCM0M"14WIONANDCA91ItItAf1101rAYAftN10&VAYI'M II01110N•AIA* 04. VidI �f�� .1��/{./�K ��` 1i.i A,,JJIi1AN iHlllti/it Ili dtt[iiitt;'T♦ 171l tIIIV %t}NY AWtJIH NiV iVAtiit.IJ:tJi.J tl[•. 71WVW. dJ�G1J 9. ON SHEET AIA DOCUMENT G7P' MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY HALL Pars d Fag: AIA. Docuz2mt G702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containinx APPLICATION NUMBER: - CONTRdCTOR`S sued Cere&k tiou is attached. In tabulaiiooa below. anw=u are st&W to the moreA dollar. AACIE TECTS PROJECT N0: Use Coluw n I on Contracts wbere variable retiinsxt for Jim items may apply. IT"I'3IK SCHEDULED COMA STORED TOTAL COMPLETED 14 BALANCE - _�-WORK Previous This Na DESCRIPTION OF WORK YALUE MATERIALS STORED TO DATE TO FINISH RETAINAGE A. 'B_ C Applications Applicatioa F G(D+E+F) % : SWITCHGEAR• •-4068. 432. ••14+68.:00 ^^ 2100^^ .00- 3968.00 53200 2•- PANELBOARDS 4942. 648 '1590.00 3000.00 - - -'450.00 •1000.00 3. FEEDER CONDUITS `4500. 1620. 5500,00 5500.00 620.00 ' ? BRANCH CIR. CONDUITS 19410•. 6300. 16500.00 7000.00 23560.00 2210.00 5• FEEDER CONDUCTORS 2000. 1500. 3500;00 , 6. BRANCH CIR. CONDUCTORS 3500. 4000. 7500.00 , 7. INT. LIGHTING FIXTURES 34426. 6300. 30000.00 4000.00 3400Q.00 6726.00 • -a- It7oou.oc3 3Z-4'�-cx1 .8. EXT. LIGHTING FIXTURES 12500. 774. 10000.00 0- 9• EMER.GEN & TRANSF.'SW. 15460. 540, 14000.00 1000.00 15000.00 1000.0.0 •' 10., WIRING DEVICES 1500•.:1260. 2760.00 11. BOXES -OUTLETS -JUNCTION 4200. 5500,. 7.500.00 7500.00 2200.00 & PULL I -0- -o- 80M.00 2 • OUND SYSTEM 7000. 1000. 3• OTOR DISCONNECTS ETC. 3400. 700, 2000.00 2000.00 2100.00 X14.. ISCELLANEOUS 3950.00• 3950.00 1150.00 r -15.- HANGE ORDER- (deduct) _. (950.00) 16. CHANGE ORDER (Sound) „' 2078.00 TQTAjjPROJECT . 19 rvc*� • 00 410 cos . co %vCa • GO S17E =AL OR 'TO'TALS 90508.00 - 25 599-439 }'l�$8-0� AIA DOICWrIEN'T G702A -- CONITUATION 5IIEE'Z --- MARCH 1971 EDITION «- AIAQ9 -- ' {e) 1971 TiiE AMERICAN INS I IAUIE OF ARCHITECM 1135 NEW YORX AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA DOCUMENT 0702 PAGE ONE OF PAGES PROJECT: NEW CITY HALL BUILDING (name, address) Lexington and State Highway 110 Mendota Heights, MN. TO (Owner) City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Mn. 55120 ARCHITECT: Lindberg Pierce, Inc. ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: CONTRACTOR: The Joseph Company, Inc. CONTRACT FOR: New Citv Hall APPLICATION DATE: 6/25/88 APPLICATION NO: Eight (8) ATTN: PERIOD FROM: 5/25/88 TO 6/25/88 CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G702A, is attached. Change Orders approved ADDITIONS S DEDUCTIONS $ in previous months by The present status of the account for this Contract is as follows TOTALS s Net change b), -Change Orders $` State of: Minnesota County of: Mower The undersigned Contractor certifies that the Work covered by this Appli- cation for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by him for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that the current payment shown herein is now due. Contractor: J05e i 1pany By: Jos' aaner, ies. Date: 6/24/88 ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM ......................$ 1,054,000.00 Net change by Change Orders ...................$ 4, 4- 9% _ SZ93 70-7 CONTRACT SUM TO DATE .......................$ ` TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE ..........$� ?fig' 2.59— (Column G on G702A) RETAINAGE 5 % ........................ or as noted in Column F on G702A TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE .................. $ ` LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT ........$ 627,601.30 CURRENT PAYMENT DUE .........................$ Subscribed and swor o before me this 24th day of June 1988 Notary Public:, My Commission expires: _ Deceflt4aer _1 91- In accorance with the Contrkcyand this Application for Payment the Contractor is entitled to payment in the amount shown above. 'QWNE? Architect: GINn6er &, PI��J IIJG. [3ARCHITECT C3 CONTRACTOR By: This Certificate is not negotiable. It is payable only to the payee named herein and its issuance, payment and acceptance are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under their Contract. AIA DOCUMENT G702 • APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT • MARCH 1971 EDITION + AIAO �I $ 0 1971 • THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006 ��f 7� ! 0� Owner — TOTAL Subsequent Change Orders Number Approved (date) G-1 - 9,169.00 G-2 4,676.00 TOTALS s Net change b), -Change Orders $` State of: Minnesota County of: Mower The undersigned Contractor certifies that the Work covered by this Appli- cation for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by him for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that the current payment shown herein is now due. Contractor: J05e i 1pany By: Jos' aaner, ies. Date: 6/24/88 ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM ......................$ 1,054,000.00 Net change by Change Orders ...................$ 4, 4- 9% _ SZ93 70-7 CONTRACT SUM TO DATE .......................$ ` TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE ..........$� ?fig' 2.59— (Column G on G702A) RETAINAGE 5 % ........................ or as noted in Column F on G702A TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE .................. $ ` LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT ........$ 627,601.30 CURRENT PAYMENT DUE .........................$ Subscribed and swor o before me this 24th day of June 1988 Notary Public:, My Commission expires: _ Deceflt4aer _1 91- In accorance with the Contrkcyand this Application for Payment the Contractor is entitled to payment in the amount shown above. 'QWNE? Architect: GINn6er &, PI��J IIJG. [3ARCHITECT C3 CONTRACTOR By: This Certificate is not negotiable. It is payable only to the payee named herein and its issuance, payment and acceptance are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under their Contract. AIA DOCUMENT G702 • APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT • MARCH 1971 EDITION + AIAO �I $ 0 1971 • THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006 ��f 7� ! 0� MaMOTA HEIGHTS CITY HALL SCHEDULE OF VALUES CONTI?YJATION SHEET AIA DOCUMENT G702A PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES AIA Document G702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing CONTRACTOR'S signed Certification is attached. APPLICATION NUMBER: (8) In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED WORK COMPLETED STORED TOTAL COMPLETED AND BALANCE RETAINAGE Previous This No. VALUE MATERIALS STORED TO DATE TO FINISH A a C Applications Application F G(O+E+F) X 'H(C—G) D E 01000 General Conditions 55r000 -0C 39,216.00 3,946.00 43,162.06 11,838. 02200 Earthwork 143,250-00 106,000.00 35,250.00 141,250.00 2,000. 02411 Foundation DrainSyst; 2,000. 11000.00 11000.00 2,000.00 02513 Bituminous Paving 19j'806-00 19,806. 02710 Vinyl coated fencing 11800.0c 11800. 02800 Landscaping 241000.QC 24,000. 0 02900 Seeding 0 03300 Concrete & Reinf. 33,614.00 59,200-00 15,664.00 741864.00 81750. 03430 Precast Concr. Plank 32,000.00 32,000.00 32,000.00 03450 C Poured Gyp.Underlaymt 5,400.00 51400. 04220 Unit Masonry 185,400.00 182,400.00 3,000.00 185,400.00 04420 Cut Stone 05120 Structural Steel 38,200.00 38,200.00 38,200.00 05500 Metal Fabrications 12,400.00 10,360.00 1,500.00 11,860.00 540. 06150 Prefab Wd. Trusses 10,000.00 10,000.00 - 10,000.00 06151 Prefab Wd. Beams 81000.00 81000.00 8,000.00 06200 Carpentry 68.400.00 59i200.00 5,000.00 64,200.00 4,200 06400 Millwork 51,000.00 51,000. 07100 Concrete Deck Coating 2,000.00 2,000. .07150 Dampproofing 4,000.00 4,000,00 4,000.00 07200 Bldg- Insulation 6,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000. 07300 Wd. Shingle Roofing 27,000.00 27,000-00 27,000.00 07640 Exterior Louvers 11800.00 1,610.00 190.00 11800.00 07900 Caulking 1,600.00 800.00 800.00 800. 08110 Stl. Frames & Doors 24,600.00 21,900.00 2,000.00 23,900.00 700. 08120 - Aluminum Door, side - lite & Window Frmg. 17,000.00 17,000. 08200 Wood Doors 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 08360 Overhead Garage Drs. 51500.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 08450 Clg. Access Panel 450.00 300-00 300.00 150. 08600 Clad Wood Windows 31,000.00 .30,600.00 400.00 31,000.00 1 1 SUB TOTAL OR TOTAL 867,220.00 1 -1 AMA DOCUMENT GMA & CONTINUATION SHEET * MARCH IM EDMO+4 * AIAO * - 0 Im THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 173S NEW YORK AVE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D. C. =46 • r' } MMMUTA HEIG= CITY HALL :ONTINUATION SHEET SCHEDULE OF VALUES AIA DOCUMENT C702A PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES ;IA Document 6702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing =ONTRACTOR'S signed Certification is attached. APPLICATION NUMBER: ( 8 ) In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Jse Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO: MEMDESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED WORK COMPLETED STORED TOTAL COMPLETED AND BALANCE RETAINAGE Previous This No. VALUE MATERIALS STORED TO DATE TO FINISH A B C Applications Application F G(D-FE+n X •H(C-G) I D E Brought Forward: 867,220. )8700 Finish Hardware 6,000.0C 6,000. )8800 Glass and Glazing 1,480.00 1,480. )9250 Metal Frulg.&Gyp. Bd. 56,000.00 6,800.00 21,200.00 28,000.00 28,000. ?9330 Ceramic & Quarry Tile 14,000.00 14,000. )9500 Acoustical Ceilings 12,000.00 12,000. )9510 Fab.cover Acoust.Pnls X3650 Resilient Flooring 21,000.00 21,000. )9680 Carpet )9900 Finish Painting 24,000.00 24,000. ?9950 Vinyl Wall Cover -0100 Porcelain Markerboar 800.00 680.00 680.00 120. :0120 Display Cases 5,200.00 5,200. 1-0180 Toilet Partitions 2,400.00 2,400. _0190 Precast Shwr.Receptrs 700.00 700.00 700.OU _0230 Disappearing Stairs 400.00 400.00 400.00 _0350 Flagpole 2,000.00 1,600.00 1,600.00 400. .0430 Cast letters & plaque 500.00 500. _0440 Interior Plaque signs 11000.00 11000. :0450 Illuminated ESct.Sign 2,600.00 .0500 Metal Lockers 6,000.00 bi��g: _0522 Fire Eict. & cabinets_ 500.00 440.00 440.00 60. _0800 Toilet Accessories 4,000.00 3,600.00 3,600.00 400. -0900 Coat Racks 300.00 200.00 200.00 100. .1380 Projection Screens 1,200.00 1,027.00 1,027.00 173. _1830 Dishwasher 700.00 700. .4_2_00 Hydraulic Elevator 24_,000.00 18,000.00 _ M00.00 23,500.00 500. Change order G-1 ` - 9,169.00 3 P'76 3 87( a, 9169. I Change order G-2 .- -416?6.8e -4-,fr76:0G. - 1 -- 1 387(c,, �, ,:07 II7,6Zlo 775,Zr 4 SUB TOTAL OR TOTAL , 660,633-00 il8-i'*26.99 270,448. AM DOCUMEXT GMA • CONTINUATION SHEET • MARCH "" MMON • AIA* • • • "" TH1 AMERICAN INSTTitRi OF ARCHI'TWM- 733 NEW YORK AVE.. N.W.. WASHINGTONit. D. r- ]Doo) LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON JULY 19, 1988 Gas Piping Licenses: Constroms Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. Total Energy Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. General Contractors Licenses: Braden Construction Earthwood Builders, Inc. Installers Plus R & L Skluzacek Construction, Inc. Shield Fire Protection, Inc. Walts Repair Service Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses: Air Conditioning Associates, Inc. Constroms Heating & Air Conditioning Total Energy Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. 1 15. Jul Fri 1:4- PM Temp Check Number 1 Temp. Check Number Vendor Name 1 Albinson 1 Albinson .� 1 Albinson 1 Albinsort 1 Albinson 5 Totals Ternp Check Number Temp Check Number 2 2 American Natl Bank 2 American Natl Bank 2 American Natl Bank 2 American Natl Bank 2 American Natl Bank 2 American Natl Bank 2 American Natl Bank 2 American Natl Bank 16 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 3 3 Earl F Anderson Assoc 3 Earl F Anderson Assoc 3 Earl F Anderson Assoc 9 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 4 4 AT&T 4 AT&T 4 AT&T 4 AT&T 4 AT&T 20 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 5 5 Corcoran Hdwe & Impl 5 Corcoran Hdwe & Impl 10 Totals Ternp Check Number 01-4330-490-70 starter 20.88 01-4330-490-50 parts 45.90 66.78 5 Dept 10 -Adm Dept 50-RD&Bridge Claims Lis -7/19/88 15-Engr• 60 -Utilities Page 1 City of Mendota jhts 20 -Police 70 -Parks 30 -Fire 80 -Planning 40 -CEO 90 -Animal Control Account Code Comments Amount 05-4305-105-15 MiSC SDlyS 25.15 05-4300-105-15 Misc SDlys 156.65 05-4300-105-15 Misc.srilys 7.90 05-4300-105-15 Misc solys 21.45 05-4300-105-15 return 4.20cr 206.95 1 14-4456-000-00 71 bonds 540.00 14-2115 71 bonds 20,000-00 14-4226-000-00 71 bonds 56.00 25-4456-000-00 78 bonds 9,337.50 25-2115 78 bonds 65,000-00 25-4226-000-00 78 bonds 69.50 3�-4456-000-00 80 bonds 39,980.00 35-4226-000-00 80 bonds 99.95 ---------- 135,082.95 2 01-4420-050-50 signs/posts 643.80 49-4420-854-00 signs/posts 205.78 50-4420-855-00 signs/posts 205.77 1,055.35 3 01-4210-070-70 3rd qtr 16.93 01-4210-050-50 July Svc 10.53 01-4210-070-70 July Svc 10.53 15-4210-060-60 July Svc 10.52 01-4:10-020-20 July Svc 27.84 76.35 4 01-4330-490-70 starter 20.88 01-4330-490-50 parts 45.90 66.78 5 15 Jul 1 Claims Lis' Page c Fri 1: M City of Mendota ihts Temp Check Number 6 Temp. Check Number Vender Name Account Code Comments Amount 6 Dakota County Chamber Comm 01-4450-110-10 6/23 mto 11.00 6 Dakota County Chamber Comm 01-4400-110-10 6/20 annual mtg 22.00 12 33.00 Totals TernD Check Number 6 TernD Check Number 7 7 Executon Systems 05-4210-105-15 rprs sta 02 109.80 7 109.80 Totals Temp Check Number 7 Temp Check Number 8 8 Fischers Gas 01-4330-490-50 Svc call 55.00 8 Fischers Gas 01-4403-030-30 trng splys 22.50 16 77.50 Totals Temp Check Number 8 Temp Check Number 9 9 ICMA RC 01-2072 7/1 & 7/15 payroll 207.74 9 ICMA RC 01-4134-110-10 7/1 R 7/15 payroll 156.92 18 364.66 Totals Temp Check Number 9 Temp Check Number 10 10 Torn Knuth 88-4415-828-00 85-3 rnileaoe 20.25 10 Torn Knuth 47-4415-852-00 87-5 mileaDe 10.35 10 Torn Knuth 49-4415-854-00 87-7 mileage 52.20 10 Torn Knuth 53-4415-857-00 88-1 mileaoe 6.75 40 89.55 Totals Temp Check Number 10 Temp Check Number 11 11 Richard Knutson Inc 88-4460-828-00 pymt 4 85-3 31,200.80 11 31, 200. 80 Totals Temp Check Number it Temp Check Number 12 12 MA Associates 01-4305-050-50 rnisc cing solys 164.65 12 MA Associates 01-4305-070-70 Misc clno splys 164.65 i 15 Jul l Claims Lis - Fr i isFri 1: dM City of Mendota ahts Temp Check Number 12 40.04 Temp. 42.79 Check 42.79 Number Vendor Name Account Code 12 MA Associates 15-4305-060-60 36 Totals Temp Check Number 12 Temp Check Number 13 13 Mendota Hghts Rubbish 01-4280-310-50 13 Mendota Huhts Rubbish 01-4260-310-70 13 Mendota Hghts Rubbish 15-4280-310-60 13 Mendota Hohts Rubbish 01-4280-315-30 5` Totals Terno Check Number 13 Temo Check Number 14 14 Midwest Siren Service 07-4300-000-00 14 Totals Temo Check Number 14 Temp Check Number 15 15 Minn Dept of Revenue 01-4320-050-50 15 Totals Temp Check Number 15 Temp Check Number 16 16 Minnesota -Conway 01-4630-030-30 16 Totals Temp Check Number 16 Temp Check Number 17 17 Minnesota Teamsters Loc 320 01-2075 17 Totals Temp Check Number 17 Temp Check Number 18 18 Northern States power 01-4212-315-30 18 Northern States power 01-4212-310-50 18 Northern States power 15-4212-310-60 18 Northern States power 01-4212-310-70 18 Northern States power 01-4212-320-70 Page Comments Amount Misc cing splys 164.65 493.95 Jur, Svc 36.15 Jun Svc 36. 15 Jur, Svc 36.13 Jun Svc 34.50 142.93 July mtcn 62.40 62. 40 June fuel tax 68. 80 68.80 Bunker pants 148.50 148.50 July dues 175. 00 175.00 Jul svc 40.04 Jul Svc 42.79 July svc 42.79 July svc 42.78 Jul svc 29.71 7 15 Jul I Claims Lis Paoe 4 Fri 1: M City of Mendota jhts Temp Check Number 18 Temp. Check Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount 18 Northern States power 15-4212-400-60 July Svc 14.38 18 Northern States power 01-4211-315-30 July Svc 442.18 18 Northern States power 01-4211-310-50 July svc 173.69 18 Northern States power 15-4211-310-60 July svc 173.69 18 Northern States Power 01-4211-310-70 July svc 173.68 18 Northern States Power 01-4211-420-50 July svc 153.85 18 Northern States Power 01-4211-300-50 July svc 391.20 216 1, 720. 78 Totals Temp Check Number 18 Temp Check Number 19 19 Northern States power 01-4211-320-70 July svc 50.74 19 Northern States Power 15-42211-400-60 July svc 432.69 19 Northern States Power 28-4211-000-00 St lighting 163.56 57 646.99 Totals Temp Check Number 19 Temp Check Number 20 20 Northwestern Bell Telephone 01-4210-110-10 Jun svc 275.70 20 Northwestern Bell Telephone 01-4210-020-20 Jun svc 244.62 20 Northwestern Bell Telephone 05-4210-105-15 Jun svc 55.66 20 Northwestern Bell Telephone 01-4210-030-30 Jun Svc 110.92 20 Northwestern Bell Telephone 01-4210-050-50 Jun svc 35.47 20 Northwestern Bell Telephone 15-4210-060-60 Jun svc 35.47 20 Northwestern Bell Telephone 01-4210-070-70 Jun Svc 35.48 140 793.32 Totals Temp Check Number 20 Temp Check Number 21 21 Norwest Bank Mpls 64-44567000-00 1987 bonds 59,717.50 21 Norwest Bank Mpls 84-4226-000-00 1987 bonds 250.00 21 Norwest Bank Mpls 20-4456-000-00 1979 bonds 2,589.90 21 Norwest Bank Mpls 25-4456-000-00 1979 bonds 2,127.60 21 Norwest Bank MplS 20-4226-000-00 1979 bonds 4.80 21 Norwest Bank MplS 14-2115 1972 bonds 100,000.00 21 Norwest Bank Mpls 14-4456-000-00 1972 bonds 5,906.25 21 Norwest Bank Mpls 14-4226-000-00 1972 bonds 36.75 21 Norwest Bank Mpls 14-2115 1975 bonds 10,000.00 21 Norwest Bank Mpls 14-4456-000-00 1975 bonds 1,330.00 21 Norwest Bank Mpls 14-4226-000-00 1975 bonds 4.20 231 ---------- 181, 967. 00 Totals Temp Check Number 21 Temp Check Number 22 22 Oxygen Service Co. 01-4305-050-50 cyk act 12.60 1 15 Jul 3 Fri 1: dM i Temp Check Number 22 Temp. Check Number Vendor Name 22 Oxygen Service Co. 44 Totals Temo Check Number Temp Check Number 23 23 Peat Marwick Main R Co 23 Peat Marwick Main & Co 23 Peat Marwick Main & Co 23 Peat Marwick Main & Co 23 Peat Marwick Main & Co 23 Peat Marwick Main & Co 23 peat Marwick Main & Co 23 peat Marwick Main & Co 184 Totals Temo Check Number Temo Check Number 24 24 Pine Rend Paving 24 Pine Rend Paving 48 Totals Temo Check Number Temp Check Number 25 25 Public Empl Ret Assn 25 public Empl Ret Assn 25 Public Empl Ret Assn 25 Public Empl Ret Assn 25 Public Empl Ret -Assn 25 public Empl Ret Assn 25 Public Empl Ret Assn 25 public Empl Ret Assn 25 Public Empl Ret Assn 25 Public Empl Ret Assn P50 Totals Temo Check Number Temo Check Number 26 26 S&T Office Products 26 S&T Office Products 52 Totals Terilp Check Number Teruo Check Number 27 Claims Li, City of Mendota Account Code 01-4305-030-30 01-4220-130-10 05-4220-130-15 21-4220-130-00 10-4220-130-00 16-4220-130-00 03-4220-1.0-00 15-4220-130-60 14-4220-130-00 01-4422-050-50 01-4422-050-50 24 01-2062 01-4134-110-10 01-4134-020-20 01-4134-030-30 01-41.34-040-40 01-4134-.050-50 01-4134-070-70 15-4134-060-60 05-4134-105-15 23-1145 25 01-4300-030-30 05-4300-105-15 26 ahts Comments cyl act final billing final billing final billing final billing final billing final billing final billing final billing wear mix fine mix 7/1 payroll 7/1 payroll 7/1 payroll 7/1 payroll 7/1 payroll 7/1 payroll 7/1 payroll 7/1 payroll 7/1 payroll sheet protectors misc splys PaOe 5 Amount 8.40 21.00 629.35 109.95 15.90 15.90 127.20 84.80 80.85 261. 05 1,325.00 493.74 1,132.30 1,626.04 2,968.23 211.21 2,810.51 9.79 100.95 194.97 108.90 64.50 283.03 171.50 6,923.59 9.00 135.76 144.76 15 Jul Fri 1: M Temp Check Number 27 Temp. Check Number Vendor Name 27 Shaw Lumber Co 27 Totals Temo Check Number Temp Check Number 28 28 J L Shiely Co 28 J L Shiely Co 56 Totals Temo Check Number Temp Check Number 29 229 Sional Car Wash 29 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 30 30 Southview Chevrolet 30 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 31 31 Winthrop & Weinstine 31 Winthrop R Weinstine 31 Winthrop R Weinstine 31 Winthrop & Weinstine 31 Winthrop K Weinstine 31 Winthrop A Weinstine 31 Winthrop R Weinstine 217 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number .mac 32 I O S 32 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 33 33 Commissioner of Revenue 33 Totals Temp Check Number Claims Lis City of Mendota hts Account Code Comments 01-4330-490-70 hockey rink rprs 27 01-4422-070-70 cl 5 key 01-4422-070-70 cl 5 key 28 01-4430-020-20 May June washes 29 15-4330-490-60 Dart 30 01-4220-120-10 Re Paster enterprises 01-4220-120-30 Re Eagle Ridge fire code 01-4221-120-10 May retainer 01-4220-120-80 Re Kensington 10-4220-.120-00 Re Kensington 01-4222-120-20 May orosecutions 01-4490-020-20 May prosecutions 31 01-4330-490-20 Copier mt cry July 01-2061 Balance June w/h Amount 435.75 435.75 29. 70 795.19 824.89 299.50 299.50 5. 12 5.12 1,745.00 485.00 506.80 232.50 50 1,000.00 132.33 4,334.13 99. 53 99.53 2,980.79 2,980.79 15 Jul Fri 1: M Temp Check Number 34 k Temp. Check Claims Lis+ City of Mendota hts Number Vendor Name Account Code 34 battery & Tire Wholesale 01-4330-440-20 34 Totals Temo Check Number 34 Temp Check Number 35 35 Briggs & Morgan 01-4226-000-00 35 Totals Temp Check Number 35 Temp Check Number 36 36 County Recorder 53-4475-857-00 36 Totals Temp Check Number 36 Temp Check Number 37 37 Leonard Endresen 01-4610-020-20 37 Totals Temp Check Number 37 Temp Check Number 38 38 First Trust 14-4456-000-00 38 First Trust 14-2115 38 First Trust 14-4226-000-00 38 First Trust 11-4456-000-00 38 First Trust 11-2115 38 First Trust 11-4226-000-00 38 First Trust 14-4456-000-00 38 First Trust 14-2115 38 First Trust 14-4226-1000-00 38 First Trust 14-4456-000-00 38 First Trust 14-2115 38 First Trust 14-4226-000-00 456 Totals Temp Check Number 38 Temp Check Number 39 39 First Trust 14-4456-000-00 39 First Trust 25-4456-000-00 39 First Trust 30-4456-000-00 39 First Trust 14-2115 Comments oil filters Re 6 O bonds filino fee letter souads 1977 bonds 1977 bonds 1977 bonds 1972 bonds 1972 bonds 1972 bonds 1976 bonds 1976 bonds 1976 bonds 1973 bonds 1973 bonds 1973 bonds 1977 bonds 1977 bonds 1977 bonds 1977 bonds Page 70 Amount 20.58 20.58 1,960.00 1,960.00 85.00 85.00 4,012.50 25, 000. 00 229.38 6,155.00 35, 000. 00 229.38 1,562.50 10, 000. 00 229.38 7,960.00 80, 000. 00 229.38 170,607.52 8,260.50 1,127.95 2,184.05 50, 000. 00 15 Jul 1, Claims List Fri 1:4 City of Mendota F Temp Check Number 39 Temp. Check Number Vendor Name Account Code 39 First Trust 25-2115 39 First Trust 30-2115 39 First Trust 14-4226-000-00 39 First Trust 37-4456-000-00 39 First Trust 37-2115 39 First Trust 37-4226-000-00 39 First Trust 42-4456-000-00 39 First Trust 42-2115 468 Totals Temp Check Number 39 Temp Check Number 40 40 First Trust 42-4226-000-00 40 First Trust 74-2115 40 First Trust 74-4456-000-00 40 First Trust 16-4456-000-00 40 First Trust 85-4456-000-00 40 First Trust 85-2115 40 First Trust 75-4456-000-00 2:80 Totals Temp Check Number 40 Temp Check Number 41 41 Govt Training Svc 01-4490-080-80 41 Totals Temp Check Number 41 Temp Check Number 42 42 A T K T 01-4210-020-20 42 A T & T 01-42210-110-10 42 A T R T 05-4210-105-15 126 Totals Temp Check Number 42 _Temp Check_Number 43 43 Banyon Data Systems 01-4220-133-10 43 Banyon Data Systems 08-4220-000-00 43 Banyon Data Systems 15-4220-133-60 43 Banyon Data Systems 14-4490-000-00 43 Banyon Data Systems 15-4220-133-60 215 Totals Temp Check Number 43 is Comments 1977 bonds 1977 bonds 1977 bonds 1978 bonds 1978 bonds 1978 bonds 1982 bonds 1982 bonds 1982 bonds 1963 bonds 1983 bonds 1983 bonds 198E bonds 1986 bonds 1985 bonds 5-12 wkshp Kresbach ld calls Id calls Id calls June svc Jun svc Jun svc Re Special assort prog UB bar code Pane 8 Amount 6,811.00 13, 189. 00 229.38 37,225.00 85, 000.00 229.38 45, 812. 50 900, 000. 00 1, 150, 088. 76 939.38 8z4, aO0. 00 23, 132. 50 27, 350. 00 81, 093.75 75, 000.00 42, 487. 50 330, 003. 13 48.00 48.00 25.19 1.67 5.04 31.90 550.00 440.00 220.00 275.00 500.00 1,985.00 15 Jul Fri 1: M i Temp Check Number 44 Temp. Check Number Vendor Name 44 Suzanne Ilten 44 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 45 45 U S West Communications 45 U S West Communications 45 U S West Communications 45 U S West Communications 45 U S West Communications 45 U S West Communications 270 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 46 46 Collins Electrical Const 46 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 47 47 Communications Center 47 Communications Center 94 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 48 46 F F Jedlicki Inc 48 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 49 49 Krechs Ofc Machines 49 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 50 50 Annandale Contr 50 Annandale Contr 100 Totals Temp Check Number Claims Lis+ page 9 City of Mendota jhts Account Code Comments Amount 08-4220-000-00 Re interior des svc CH 3,372.30 3,372.30 44 05-4210-105-15 July svc 19.50 01-4210-020-20 July svc 83.95 15-4210-060-60 July svc 276.85 01-4210-050-50 July svc 34.56 15-4210-060-60 July Svc 34.56 01-4210-070-70 July Svc 34.58 484.00 45 31-4460-839-00 pymt 5 86-11 54,082.12 54, 082.12 46 01-4330-450-20 rprs 40.00 01-4330-450-20 rors 51.00 91.00 47 49-4460-854-00 pymt 1 87-7 39,388.90 39, 388.90 48 01-4300-110-10 toner etc 186.85 186.85 49 31-4460-839-00 pymt 6 86-9 9,624.23 47-4460-852-00 pymt 1 87-5 33,847.98 43, 472.21 50 1 15 Jul 1 Claims List Fri 1:S I City of Mendota I its Temp Check Number 51 Temp. Check Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments 51 So St Paul Bee Line Svc 01-4330-440-20 alignment 2243 51 Totals Temp Check Number 51 Temp Check Number 52 52 Acro Minn 15-4300-060-60 Printer ribbon 52 Totals Temp Check Number 52 Temp Check Number 53 53 Riffs Inc 01-4200-610-70 July rent 53 Siffs Inc 01-4200-610-70 7-15 rent 106 Totals Temp Check Number 53 Temp Check Number 54 54 Commissioner of Trspt 05-4402-105-15 Manuals 54 Commissioner of Trsot 01-4211-421-50 110 R Lex rors 108 Totals Temp Check Number 54 Temp Check Number 55 55 Gardner Hdwe 01-4330-460-30 Hydrant painting 55 Totals Temp Check Number 55 Temp Check Number 56 56 Hdwe Hank 01-4305-030-30 misc splys 56 Totals Temp Check Number- 56 Temp Check Number 57 y 57 Gem Comm 01-4330-450-30 belt clip 57 Totals TemD Check Number 57 Temp Check Number 58 58 Pitney Bowes Credit Corp 01-4330-490-20 Dict Eq Fuge 10 Amount 25.00 25.00 148.53 148.53 344.00 66.00 430. 00 30.00 12.76 42.76 62.72 62.72 8.68 8.68 12. 68 12.68 156.00 1 15 .Jul Fri 1: M Temp Check Number 58 Temp. Check Number Vendor Name 58 Totals Temp Check Number Temo Check Number 59 59 City of St Paul 59 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 60 60 Orfei Contr Inc 60 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 61 61 Sandra N.rebsbach 61 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 62 62 United Electric Co 62 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 63 63 Midwest Wholesale Tire 63 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 64 64 MEAA 64 T Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 65 65 SPC Distr Center 65 Totals Temp Check Number Claims Lis' page li City of Mendota hts Account Code Comments Amount 156.00 58 01-4305-020-20 Jun svc 27.45 27.45 59 38-4460-844-00 pymt 4 86-13 10,319.80 10, 319.80 60 01-4415-080-80 mileage 5-12 wksho 9.45 9.45 61 01-4305-030-30 misc solys 296.76 296.76 62 01-4330-490-50 tire mounting 25.00 25.00 63 01-4480-200-70 T Ball 3,015.00 3, 01 S. 10 64 01-4301-110-10 update 56.00 56.00 65 1 1!� Jul I Fri 1: M i Temp Check Number 66 Temp. Check Number Vendor Name 66 North Star Concrete Co 66 North Star Concrete Co 132 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 67 67 Pauls Auto Body 67 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 68 68 Business Records Corp 68 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 69 69 Dakota County Hwy Dept 69 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 70 70 State Treasurer 70 State Treasurer 70 State Treasurer 210 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 71 71 Ruttger Ray Lake Lodge 71 Totals -Temp -Check Number^_ Temp Check Number 72 72 Brad Ragan Inc 72 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 73 73 Richfield Plbg Claims Lis+ City of Mendota hts Account Code 01-4305-050-50 15-4305-060-60 66 01-4610-020-20 67 01-4620-640-12 68 01-4211-421-50 69 15-3315 01-3315 01-3615 70 07-4400-000-00 71 01-4330-490-50 72 01-3254 Pape 12 Comments Amount adjusting ring 119.00 adjusting ring 119.00 238.00 paint squad 500.00 500.00 demo box 142_43 142.43 city share tfc signal 248.48 248.48 2nd qtr s/chgs 23.00 2nd qtr s/chos 3,678.00 adm fee 156.05cr 3,744.95 rear Delmont 228.00 228.00 rprs 74.58 74.58 rfd perm 2937 26.00 l 15 Jul Fri 1: 'M J Temo Check Number 73 J Temp. Check Number Vendor Name 73 Richfield Rlbg 146 Totals Temo Check Number Temp Check Number 74 74 Edward Vaillancort 74 Totals Temp Check Number 6225 Grand Total Claims Lis' City of Mendota ihts Account Code 01-3315 73 01-4410-020-20 74 MANUAL CHECKS.- 11789 HECKS: 11789 50.00 Briggs & Morgan 11790 10,383.45 Dakota County Bank 11791 645.00 " 11792 3,699.52 SCCU 11793 34,881.55 City M.H. Payroll a/c 11794 1,329.98 LMCIT HP 11795thru 11799 75.00 Softball umpires 11800 140.00 MPCA 11801 150.00 Mn Dept of Health 11802 300.00 Trophy House 11803 1,165.00 Deputy REgistrar 11804 540.00 Ken Weisenberge 11805 329.03 U S Post Ofc 11806 734.44 Deputy Registrar 11807thru 11811 150.00 Umnires 54,572.97 G.T. 2,244,00280 Rage 13 Comments Amount rfd perm 3937 0.50 26.50 dry cing 70.33 70.33 Regr Frazell 7/1 FIT,FICA,MEDIRARE 7/1 Payroll Deductions 7/1 net payroll July premium Plans review- 88-1 11 Mens softball Excise tax squads Tools P. W. utility bills Excise tax P. W. truck ------------ 2,169,429.83 ----------- 2,169,429.83 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO JULY 6, 1988 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D GFr��, City Administrator SUBJECT: Award of City Hall Telephone System Bid Attached is a memo from telephone consultant Bill Burke, tabulating the bids which were received on the phone system for the new city hall, and making a recommendation for award. SYSTEM I Bill's memo analyzes the three lowest bids and sets forth his reasons for rejecting the bottom two, from Iwatsu and Walker Poets respectively. He recommends that we award the bid to AirComm/T.S.I. for a Tie Ultracom AT System in the amount of $12,518. I WIRING BID Wiring for the system was set forth in the specifications as a separate bid item. However, the low bid from Iwatsu was made contingent on their receiving the award for the phone system itself. Therefore, Bill recommends that we award the wiring bid to the second low bidder, Wahl & Wahl Inc., in the amount of $3,012. FINANCIAL AND BUDGET IMPACT The total amount of the bid for the two items combined is $15,530. Based on past experience, Bill recommends that the Council authorize a deviation of up to 5% from this I amount during installation, as some changes are inevitable. This would amount to about $750 in potential additional expense, bringing the maximum cost to $16,280. The amount allocated in the city hall project budget for the phone system is $25,000. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs in the recommendations, it should accept the telephone system bids as presented by consultant Bill Burke, and award the system purchase to AirComm/T.SII. in the amount of $12,518, and the wiring and jack installation bid to Wahl & Wahl, Inc., in the amount of $3,012. KDF:madlr BURKE ENGINEEI'RING, INC. 707 DECORAH LANE MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 Bill Burke 1(612) 454-3464 T•' R40RANDUM DATE: July 6, 1988 TO: Kevin Frazell, City Administrator City of Mendota Iieights FROM: Bill Burke, Consultant SUBJECT: Recommendation for Contract Awards - New City Hall Telephone System You will recall that the City Hall Telephone System R.F.P. asked for separate bids for the "Telephone System", and the "Wiring and Jacks". Nine proposals were received for the Telephone System, and eleven proposals were received for the Wiring and Jacks, including bids from two wiring only contractors. The ranking of all bids received is shown on Attachment A. TELEPHONE SYSTEM The Telephone System bids were reviewed in rank order in order to determine whether the proposal met the Telephone Specifications. The results are as follows: Advanced Telecommunications Technologies, Inc._ I recommend rejection of their proposal for two reasons: Section 10 Paragraph 12 of the R.F.P. included the following statement: Furthermore, the bidder must include a manufacturer's statement guaranteeing that all components of the system being proposed will be available for additions and maintenance to the system for a minimum of five years from the date of installation. The following is an exerpt from the 6-17-88 letter from Iwatsu America, Inc. to the City of Mendota Heights included in the proposal: Except for unforeseen circumstances such as discontinuance:'of components by other manufacturers, we would assume that spare or suitable parts would be available for as long as ten years. I do not consider this statement to be acceptable, or meeting the specification. 2. Section 12.4 of the R.F.P. listed features that the Telephone System must have. On page 9, the following station feature was specified: Ring Transfer Arrangement: Operate Key to activate programmed ringing for a line or lines that normally do not ring at that station. L.E.D. Indicator when feature is activated. 11 In a 6-24-88 meeting with them, they admitted that they could not provide this feature as it was intended. I consider this feature to be critically important for thelease of the system operation as it applies to daytime backup operation, and occasional "night" operation by various individuals. -2 - Action Telecom, Inc. I recommend rejection of their proposal for the following reason: Section 12.4 of the R.F.P. listed features that the Telephone System must have. On page 8, the following station feature was specified: Intercom: Option, where desired: Hands free answer back - both on hook and off hook In the "Exceptions To Speeifications" portion of their proposal, item 1. Poets does not offer off -hook voice announce. I consider this to be a very viable option for the station users. AirComm/TSI I recommend acceptance of their proposal. It meets all requirements of the R.F.P. in a satisfactory manner. AirComm, Inc. has been in business for twenty years. AirComm/TSI is now a "company store", and Tie is one of the two top manufacturers of small business telephone systems in the United States. Attached is a copy of their completed "Telephone System Cost Sheet Specification Attachment C". WIRING AND JACKS Wahl & Wahl, Inc. I recommend acceptance of their proposal. It meets all requirement's of the R.F.P. in a satisfactory manner. Wahl & Wahl, Inc. has been in business for over fifty years, and is'experienced in the office automation industry. Attached is a copy of their completed "Telephone System Cost Sheet '- Specification Attachment C". CONCLUSION Assuming concurrence with the above two recommendations, the total 'base bids for the complete installation would be as follows: Telephone System $12,518.00 Wiring and Jacks $ 3,012.00 TOTAL $15,530.00 No payment terms were specified in either of the above proposals. Therefore, the terms are negotiable. I would recommend that Purchase Orders be issued for the base bids, with complete payments after satisfactory completion of the work. Some minor variation (additions and/or deletions) will undoubtedlylbe required. Each proposal contains unit costs for additions and deletions. I recommend that the City Council pre -authorize variations of plus or minus 5% to the base bids to allow for these possible variations. KrTAG194i;f T A CITY OF Ifi;NDOTA ITUGIiTS: TELEPHONE SYSTEM FOR NEW CITY IIALL - PROPOSALS f'ECEIVFD I RANKING OF WIRI14G AND JACKS FIRiq SYSTEM PROPOSED SYSTEM BIDS BIDS I I RANK. Advanced Telecommunications Technologies, Inc. Action Telecom, Inc. Ai.rComm/T.S.I. Tele -Technologies, Inc. A Plus Applied Business Communications Executone Systems of St. Paul, Inc. Cady Communications, Inc. Iwatsu Omega IV 24/72 Walker Poets CTX Tie Ultraeom AT Premier ESP 'Trillium Panther 12o64 (Encore CX Tie Businesscom Plus $ 9,773.00 $11,900.00 $12,518.00 $13,143.00 $13,221.00 $15,876.00 $16,639.00 $1,760.00 $4,060.00 I $4,926.oI $4,880.01 $3,529.00 $4,911.00 $7,930.00 1 .1 6 9 7 It 8 11 Telex Computer Products, Telex 3060 $16,853.00 $7,619.00 10 Inc. Wahl & Wahl, Inc. Harris Lanier $18,905.00 $3,012.00 2 Series XX -EX P & T Communications --- --- $3,450.00 3 Professionals, Inc. Appollo Communications Co. --- --- $3,839.00 5 NOTE 1. Advanced Telecommunications Technologies, Inc.'s quotation on Wiring & Jacks is valid only if they are awarded the "Telephone Equipment" bid, per statement included in their response. NOTE 2. Wahl & Wahl, Inc.'s "Wiring and Jacks" bid is not contingent on the "Telephone System" bid, per Monica Burrill 6--24-88. TELEPHONE SYSTEM COST SHEET SPECIFICATION ATTACHMENT C City of Mendota Heights City Hall 1101 Highway 110 Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Date: JUNE 20 1988 _ Proposalsubmm'i� y: ANT BUR TLT. c,/n WAt-tt. k wALn., INC. MPLS., MN 55431 Telephone System Proposed: YY -FX I Feature Program Proposed: SAME ALL INCP- - �- Installed cost of the telephone wiring and jacks j as defined in Specification Section 11.0 through 11.2 ... $ 3,012.00 Additions/Deletions - Four twisted pair - Two twisted pair - Duplex jack, one - Single jack, one - Single Jack, one Instilled cost station wire per 100 foot run q­jcllrn station wire per 100 foot run three pair & one two pair three vair two pair ,$8.00 Installed cost of the telephone system as defined in Specification Section 12.0 through 12.5 ... Additions/Deletions - Central offs a line card: Capacity - Station Card.,*.,Capacity Stations - Attendant ConJole, incluUing busy lamp and direct station selection - Multi -line desk telephone set with 20 station busy ,lamp field ., - Muiti-line desk telephone set - Multi -line t4dll telephone set Elevator single line telephone set - Outdoor single line telephone set in weatherproof cabinet - Intercom Box speaker -microphone only Multi -line desk/wall telephone with integrated speaker phone $ 18,905' Installed Cost Lines incl at $15.00 incl. at $15.00 field irrl at• $5 nn I innl. at $5.00 at X5.00 TELEPHONE SYSTEM COST SHEET SPECIFICATION ATTACHMENT C City of Mendota Heights City Hall 1101 Highway 110 Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Date: June 21/88 Proposa su mi e y: orge Tourville Aircom/TSI 5845 Blaine Ave. Inver Grove Heights, Mn. 55075 Telephone System Proposed: Tie Ultracon AT - Feature Program Proposed: ' Current CPU -C Iristalled cost of the telephone wiring and jacks as defined in Specification Section 11.0 through 11.2 .. Additions/Deletions - Four twisted pair station wire per 100 foot - Two twisted pair station wire per 100 foot - Duplex jack, one three pair & one two pair - Single lack, one three Vair - Single hack, one two pair S 4.,926-00 Installled Cost run '1 11 run 71; 1/ 70.00 11 --------------------------------------------------------- Installed cost of the telephone system as defined in Specification Section 12.0 through 12.5 ... $ 1 x,_51 R nn I Additions/Deletions Installed Cost - Central office line card: Capacity 4 Lines - Station Card: Capacity44_ Stations - Attendant Console, inclu�g busy lamp field and direct station selection - Multi -line desk telephone set with 20 station busy lamp field - Multi -line desk telephone set - Multi -line wall telephone set - Elevator single line telephone set - Outdoor single line telephone set in weatherproof cabinet - Intercom Box speaker -microphone only - Multi -line desk/wall telephone with integrated speaker phone - Multi -line telephone with speaker phone/display 170.00 12,,5 00 440.00 328.00 • CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 13, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City A s or FROM: James E. Danielson // Public Works Director SUBJECT: Eugenia Street Vacation Ms. Jan Peyer, the applicant for vacating Eugenia Street, was unable to attend the last City Council meeting so Council continued the public hearing until this meeting. Please bring staff memos from last meeting. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct the continued hearing and if Council desires to approve the application they should pass a motion approving Resolution No. 88- 1 , RESO- LUTION APPROVING VACATION OF A STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY.. If Council desires to deny the request they should pass a motion to deny the request. �4 City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF A STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights is the current record owner of a street right-of-way as described as follows; and That part of vacated Eugenia Avenue as dedicated within the plat of Cherokee Park Heights described as lying Easterly of the southwesterly extension of the northwesterly line of Lot 1, Block 1, said Cherokee Park Heights and lying Westerly of the southwesterly extension of the southeasterly line of Lot 2, said Block 1, reserving the described property for a drainage and utility easement. WHEREAS, a notice of hearing on said vacation has been duly published and posted more than two weeks before the date scheduled for the hearing on said vacation, all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said vacation on July 5, 1988, at 8:15 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall of the City of Mendota Heights;' and WHEREAS, the City Council then proceeded to hear all persons interested in said vacation and all persons were afforded an opportunity to present their views and objections to the granting of said petition. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the vacation of the street right-of-way described above, sit- uated in the City of Mendota Heights, is in the best interest of the public and the City, and is not detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the community. 2. That the above described street right-of-way be and the same is hereby vacated, reserving the above described property for a drainage and utility easement. 3. That the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and present to the proper Dakota County officials a notice of com- pletion of these vacation proceedings, all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 19th day of July, 1988. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 11, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City or FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Fire Hydrant Installation Lexington Heights Addition Job No. 8627 Improvement No. 86, Project No. 14 nTRr114RTnm Construction of three fire hydrants to serve the Lexington Heights Apartment complex has been completed. The total project cost that 'should be assessed is $28,784.60. The feasiblity estimate of the project was�$22,000. The increase in the project cost were due to difficulties working with the Owner, to unforseen field conditions. The plat consists of three lots and the costs were distributed equally which amounts to $9,595.00 per lot. The interest rate for this project is eight percent. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council approve the attached assessment roll as prepared. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct the public hearing and if Council concurs with the staff recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 88L , RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLATION TO SERVE LEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO 14). ASSESSMEA ERIOD CITY OF MENDOTA CGHTS ASSESSMENT RA" Fire Hydrant Installation - 19 years ASSESSMENT ROLL Fire Hydrants - $9,595.x... per lot. LEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITION Interest Rate - 8% IMPROVEMENT NO. 86-14 JOB NO. 8627 ADOPTED: PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK. FIRE HYDRANT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. ASSESSMENT 27-44925- Lexington Heights Association Lexington Heights Add. 1 1 $9,595.00 $9,595.00 010-01 Ltd. Partnership 2320 Lexington Avenue South Mendota Heights, MN 55120 27-44925- Lexington Heights Association Lexington Heights Add. 2 1 $9,595.00 $9,595.00 020-01 Ltd. Partnership 2320 Lexington Avenue South Mendota Heights, MN 55120 27-44925- Lexington Heights Association Lexington Heights Add. 3 1 $9,595.00 $9,595.00 030-01 Ltd. Partnership 2320 Lexington Avenue South Mendota Heights, MN 55120 City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLATION TO SERVE LEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 14) BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights as follows: WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, has calculated the proper amount to be specially assessed for the costs incurred to date with respect to Improvement No. 86, Project No. 14 construction of commercial district street light improvements to serve the following des- cribed property situated in the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: Lots 1 through 3, Block 1, Lexington Heights Addition, MendotalHeights, Dakota County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the proposed assessment roll has been on file with the Clerk and at all times since its filing has been open for public inspection; and notice thereof has been duly published and mailed as required by law. Said notice stated the date, time and place of such meeting; the general naturelof the improvement; the area proposed to be assessed; that the proposed assessment roll has been on file with the Clerk; and that written or oral objections thereto by any property owner would be considered; and WHEREAS, said hearing was held at 8:15 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, July 19, 1988, at the City Hall in the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Mayor announced that the hearing was open for the consideration of objections, if any, to said proposed assessments; and WHEREAS, all persons present were then given an opportunity to present oral objections, and all written objections theretofore filed with the Clerk were presented and considered. NOW THEREFORE, this Council, having heard and considered all objections so presented, and being fully advised in the premises, and having madeall necessary adjustments and corrections, finds that each of the lots, Ipieces and parcels of land enumberated in the proposed assessment roll wasland is specially benefited by the construction of said improvements in not Iless than the amount of the assessment, as corrected, set opposite the descrip- tion of each such lot, piece and parcel of land, respectively, and that such amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein described; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proposed assessment roll is hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper special assessment for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land respectively, and the assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum accruing on the full amount thereof from time to time unpaid, shall be • a lien concurrent with general taxes upon such parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment as to fire hydrant installation shall be payable in equal amounts extending over a period of nineteen (19) years; the first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assess- ment commencing thirty (30) days from the date hereof to December 31, 1988, to be payable with general taxes for the year 1988, collectible in 1989 (now designated as real estate taxes payable in 1989), and one of each of the remaining installments, together with one year's interest on that and all other unpaid installments, to be payable with general taxes for each con- secutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that prior to August 19, 1988, the owner of;any lot, piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the whole of such assessment, without interest to the City Treasurer; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of said assessment roll with each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County, and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessments in the manner provided by law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 19th day of day of July, 1988. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By arles E. Mertensotto, Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 11, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and Cit Gmo�t 'ator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Creek Realignment Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition Job No. 8315 Improvement No. 83, Project No. 6 T)Tqrllq.qTnN! The project to realign the creek along Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition has been completed. The total project cost of $21,788,55 is to be assessed to Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition as per the attached assessment roil. Original estimates are not comparable because the design was changed, but one feasibility estimate of $24,000 for a project of comparable size. This larger lot should be platted into three lots at a future date and the assessments will be divided accordingly at that time. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council approve the attached assessment roll as prepared. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct the public hearing and if Council concurs with the staff recom- mendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 88- Y1 RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR CREEK REALIGNMENT TO SERVE LOT 2, WILLOW SPRINGS ADDITION IMPROVEMENT (IMPROVEMENT NO. 83, PRO- JECT NO. 6) 1 ASSESL,.—NT PERIOD Creek Realignment - 19 years INTEREST RATE: 8% CITY OF MEN _A HEIGHTS ASSESSMENT ROLL LOT 2, WILLOW SPRINGS ADDITION IMPROVEMENT NO. 83-6 JOB NO. 8315 ADOPTED: PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK. NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. 27-84300- Mickelson Homes, Inc. Willow Springs Addition 2 -- 020-00 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 CREEK REALIGNMENT $21,899.16 TOTAL $21,899.16 City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR CREEK REALIGNMENT TO SERVE LOT 2, WILLOW SPRINGS ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 83, PROJECT NO. 6) BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights as follows: WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, has calculated the proper amount to be specially assessed for the costs incurred to date with respect to Improvement No. 83, Project No. 6 construction of commercial district street light improvements to serve the followingides- cribed property situated in the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition, Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the proposed assessment roll has been on file with the Clerk and at all times since its filing has been open for public inspection; and 'notice thereof has been duly published and mailed as required by law. Said notice, stated the date, time and place of such meeting; the general nature of the improvement; the area proposed to be assessed; that the proposed assessment roll has been on file with the Clerk; and that written or oral objections thereto by any property owner would be considered; and I WHEREAS, said hearing was held at 8:15 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, July,19, 1988, at the City Hall in the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Mayor announced that the hearing was open for the consideration of objections, if any, to said proposed assessments; and I WHEREAS, all persons present were then given an opportunity to present oral objections, and all written objections theretofore filed with the Cl I erk were presented and considered. I NOW THEREFORE, this Council, having heard and considered all objections so presented, and being fully advised in the premises, and having, made 'all necessary adjustments and corrections, finds that each of the lots, 'pieces and parcels of land enumberated in the proposed assessment roll was and is specially benefited by the construction of said improvements in not less I than the amount of the assessment, as corrected, set opposite the descrip- tion of each such lot, pieceandparcel of land, respectively, and that such amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lolts, pieces and parcels of land therein described; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proposed assessment roll is hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper special assessment for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land respectively, and the assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum accruing on the full amount thereof from time to time unpaid, shall be a lien' con- current with general taxes upon such parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment as to creek realignment shall be payable in equal amounts extending over a period of nineteen (19) years; the first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment co- mmencing thirty (30) days from the date hereof to December 31, 1988, to be payable with general taxes for the year 1988, collectible in 1989 (now designated as real estate taxes payable in 1989), and one of each of the remaining installments, together with one year's interest on that and all other unpaid installments, to be payable with general taxes for each,con- secutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that prior to August 19, 1988, the owner of any lot, piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the whole of such assessment, without interest to the City Treasurer; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall prepare and transmit to;the County Auditor a certified duplicate of said assessment roll with each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County, and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessments in the manner provided by law. I Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 19th'day of day of July, 1988. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Iuigue July TO: Mayor, City Council and City m' i for FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets Stratford Woods Job No. 8626 Improvement No. 86, Project No. 13 DISCUSSION: 11, 1988 The project to construct sanitary sewers, watermains, storm sewer and streets to serve the Stratford Woods Addition has been completed.1 Staff has prepared the attached assessment roll for Council review. The plat consists of 14 lots and staff has distributed the costs equally over those lots and has arrived at an assessment of $10,837.82 per lot. The feasibility estimate was $12,830 per lot. The interest rate for this project is eightfpercent. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council approve the attached assessment roll as prepared. 1 ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct the required public hearing and if Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 88- RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR SEWER,,WATER, STORM SEWER, STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE STRATFORD WOODS AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 13) N ASSESSMENT PERIOD CITY 0'MENDOTA HEIGHTS ASSESSMENT RATES Sanitary Sewers - 19 years ASSESSMENT ROLL Sanitary Sewer - $3,017.73 per lot Watermeius - 19 years STDAIFODD WOODS Natermain - $3,200.64 per lot Storm Severs - lV years IMPROVEMENT NO. 86-13 Storm Sewer - s901.33 per lot Streets - lO years JOB NO. 8626 Streets - $3,186.73 per Int zmrEnEsr aeoE. a% ADOPTED: PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT DLK SANITARY gAI2D STORM STREETS TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. SEWERS MAINS SEWERS 27-72700- Terrence R. Dobie Stratford Woods l l $3,017.73 $3,200,64 $961.33 g3,186.73 $10,366,43 010-01 1836 Rolling Green Curve Mendota Heights, 80 55118 27-72700- Terrence D. Dobie Stratford Woods 2 l $3,017.73 *3,200.64 $96I.33 $3,186.73 $10,366.43 020-0I 1836 Rolling Green Curve Mendota Heights, M0 55118 27-72700- Terrence R. Dobie Stratford Woods 3 l $3,017.73 $3,200,64 $961.33 $3,186.73 $10,366,43 030-0I 1836 Rolling Green Curve Mendota Heights, M0 55118 ' 27-72700- Terrence R. Dobie Stratford Woods 4 l $3,017.73 $3,200.64 *96I,33 *3,186.73 $10,366.43 040-01 1836 Rolling Green Curve Mendota Heights, M0 55118 27-72700- Terrence R. Dobie Stratford Woods 5 l $3,017.73 $3,200.64 $96I.33 *3,I86,73 *18,366,43 050-01 1836 Rolling Green Curve Mendota Heights, MN 551I8 27-72700- Robert & Marla Powers Stratford Woods l 2 $3,817,73 $3,200.64 $96I.33 s3,186.73 *10,366'43 010-02 2325 Endicott Street ' St' Poul, 0N 55115 27-72700- Terrence D. Dobie Stratford Woods 2 2 $3'017-73 $3,200.64 $961.33 *3,186.73 $10,306,43 020-02 1836 Rolling Green Curve Mendota Heights, UN 551I8 � 27-72700- Dennis & Rachel A. Costello Stratford Woods 3 2 S3,017.73 $3.200.64 $96I.33 53,I86'73 $10,366'43 030-02 1923 Coventry Court Mendota Heights, MN 55118 27-72700- Terrence R. Dobie Stratford Woods 4 2 $2,017.73 $3,200.64 $96I.33 $3,186.73 $10,366'43 040-02 1826 Rolling Green Curve Mendota Heights, MB 55118 PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION NO. DESCRIPTION NO. 27-72700- Terrence B. Dobie Stratford Woods 050-02 1836 Dolling Green Curve 2 $3,017.73 Mendota Heights, MB 55118 $961,33 $3,186,73 $10,386'43 27-72700- Terrence D. Dobie Stratford Woods 060-02 1886 Rolling Green Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 27-72700- Terrence B. Dobie Stratford Woods 070-02 1836 Rolling Green Curve Mendota Heights, M0 551I8 27-72700- Terrence R. Dobie Stratford Woods 080-02 1836 DnIIipa Green Curve Mendota Heights, 80 55118 27-72700- Angeline K. McDonald Stratford Woods 090-02 1925 Victoria Road South Mendota Heights, MN 55118 LOT BIK SANITARY WATER STORM STREETS IYIQD. ` NO. NO. SEWERS MAINS SEWERS 5 2 $3,017.73 $3,200.64 $961,33 $3,186,73 $10,386'43 9 2 $3,017.73 $3,200.64 $961.33 $3,186.73 $10,366,43 City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER, STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE STRATFORD WOODS AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 13) BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights as follows: WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer,,has calculated the proper amount to be specially assessed for the costs incurred to date with respect to Improvement No. 86, Project No. 13 construction of sewer, water storm sewer, streets and curb and gutter improvements to serve the following described property situated in the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: Lots 1 through 5, Block 1, Lots 1 through 9, Block 2, Stratford Woods Addtion, Dakota County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the proposed assessment roll has been on file with the Clerk and at all times since its filing has been open for public inspection; and notice thereof has been duly published and mailed as required by law. Said notice stated the date, time and place of such meeting; the general nature of the improvement; the area proposed to be assessed; that the proposed assessment roll has been on file with the Clerk; and that written or oral objections thereto by any property owner would be considered; and WHEREAS, said hearing was held at 8:15 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, July 19, 1988, at the City Hall in the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Mayor announced that the hearing was open for the consideration of objections, if any, to said proposed assessments; and WHEREAS, all persons present were then given an opportunity to present oral objections, and all written objections theretofore filed with the Clerk were presented and considered. NOW THEREFORE, this Council, having heard and considered all objections so presented, and being fully advised in the premises, and having made all necessary adjustments and corrections, finds that each of the lots; pieces and parcels of land enumberated in the proposed assessment roll was and is specially benefited by the construction of said improvements in not less than the amount of the assessment, as corrected, set opposite the descrip- tion of each such, lot, piece and parcel of land, respectively, andithat such amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein described; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proposed assessment roll is hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper special assessment for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land respectively, and the assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum accruing on the full amount thereof from time to time unpaid,1 shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon such parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment as to sanitary sewers, storm sewers, and watermains shall be payable in equal amounts extending over a period of nineteen (19) years and each assessment as to streets, curb and gutter shall be payable in equal amounts extending over a period of ten (10) years; the first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment commencing thirty (30) days from the date hereof to December 31, 1988, to be payable with general taxes for the year 1988, collectible in 1989 (now designated as real estate taxes payable in 1989), and one of each of the remaining installments, together with one year's interest on that and all other unpaid installments, to be payable with general taxes for each con— secutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that prior to August 19, 1988, the owner of, any lot, piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the while of such assessment, without interest to the City Treasurer; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of said assessment roll with each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County, and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessments in the manner provided by law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 19th day of day of July, 1988. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By I Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk 4 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 15 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: C.G. Rein Apartments nTgrlTRgTnN •:: Attached are C.G. Rein's plans that have been amended to meet the Council's desire to have the buildings setback from Dodd Road rightLof-way a minimum of 100 feet. They have also rerouted their access road to exit through the City's parkland onto Mendakota Drive. An easement agreement will have to be drafted between the City and the Developer to allow the road through the park and to allow construction of the two entrance monuents. Mr. Bernie Friel has contacted the City and informed us that he feels the City has effected a zoning change by approving this project. He feels this zoning change was improper because it was by 3/5 vote. He also feels that the City Attorney's office has a conflict in the matter and should not offer advice. Mr. Friel intends to have an attorney present at the meeting to discuss these two facts with the Council. Because of the possibility of a conflict, Staff has contactedian inde- pendent attorney (Mr. Tim Kuntz) and will have his written opinion on the matter available for Tuesday evenings meeting. We will also have him pre- sent at the meeting to answer any questions. ACTION REQUIRED: Review the current site plan and should Council desire to approve the request, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 88- ,,RESOLU- TION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, in its deliberations on Planning Case No. 86- 11, the City Council has previously determined the Mendakota Estates Planned Unit Development to be consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan of the community, specifically that section allowing for housing styles and types different than specified in the underlying zoning under the planned unit development provision of the zoning ordinance, Ordinance No. 401; and WHEREAS, by Resolution 86-51, the Council, upon recommedation of the Planning Commission, has previously determined that the construction of 140 residential units in the Mendakota Estates Planned Unit Development is consistent with the number of units allowed by the underlying R-1 zoning designation on the property; and WHEREAS, the Mendakota Estates provides for construction of up to residential units on Outlot A; and Planned Unit development 106 multi -family WHEREAS, the Heights of Mendota Limited Partnership applied for a conditional use permit and preliminary development plan to construct 106 multi -family units on Outlot A, Mendakota Estates Planned Unit Development, previously approved by Resolution No. 86-51. has NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ofithe City of Mendota Heights, that the following findings are made concerning the application: 1. 2. The preliminary development plan is an effective and unified treatment of the development possibilities for this property. The development plan maximizes the preservation of open 'space on the site, and harmonizes with existing and proposed development in areas surrounding the project site, including a country club clubhouse and fairways, city fire station, commercial development, high powered electrical transmission lines and substation, a State trunk highway, and single family neighborhoods: I 3. The C.G. Rein Company, financial backer of the project, has a demonstrated record of financial capability to complete projects of this scale. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that, based on the above findings, the conditional use permit and preliminary development plan for the proposed project is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the project is developed in accordance with drawings as submitted. 2. That 1.67 acres of property be dedicated to thelCity as public park land, as shown in the application materials. 3. That final engineering and landscaping plans be approved by the City staff, with special attention being given to the landscaping in the southeast part of the site to protect as much as possible single family neighborhoods to the south and east. 4. That the building material be brick as indicated on the building elevation materials submitted. I ad by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heigh L9th day of July, 1988. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensot Mayo CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 14, '1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Kensington PUD Final Plat DISCUSSION: The Indirect Source Permit has been issued and the City has executed a Developers Agreement with Centex to allow development of the Southeast Area. Centex has submitted the attached final plat to begin Phase I of their Manor Homes. Staff has reviewed the plat and finds that it conforms to the preliminary plat approved. Park dedication for this plat will be laAd and part will be a portion of the dedicated for the entire Southeast Area PUD. Negotiations are presently underway with the Developer to design thelsize and location of the park. RECOMMENDATION: Subject to Dakota County concurrence, staff recommends approval of the final plat as submitted. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should pass a motion approving Resolution 88— RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR KENSINGTON P.U.D. I 53 City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 88— RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR KENSINGTON P.U.D. WHEREAS, a final plat for Kensington P.U.D. has been submitted to the Council; and WHEREAS, the -City Council has reviewed said final plat. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the final plat of Kensington'P.U.D. submitted at this meeting be and the same is hereby approved. 2. That the appropriate City officials be and they are hereby authorized to execute the final plat on behalf of the City of Mendota Heights. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 19th day of July, 1988. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City s for FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Right Turn Lane on Delaware Avenue DT9C1149TnN July 13, 1988 '20- A � One of the City's in luential residents (Kevin) often travels north on Delaware Avenue to go on Trunk Highway 110. There is only a gravel shoulder as a right turn lane and he suggests that the intersection would be much improved if a right turn lane were paved. Delaware is a County Road and the City needs to request the County to complete the work. RECOMMENDATION: Because of the growing amount of traffic using Delaware from the south— east area development staff recommends that the Delaware intersection with Trunk Highway 110 be improved by having a right turn lane added. We hope that this small amount of paving could be done out of the County maintenance budget with no cost to the City. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should pass a motion requesting that Dakota County pave a right turn lane for north bound traffic on Delaware Avenue at its intersection with Trunk Highway 110. MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS July 13, 1988 To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevin F4-4-.-0,)City Administrator Re: Participation in Property Tax Lawsuit Attached is a memo from the Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) describing their legal challenge to the 1988 property tax bill. The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities have voted in join in the suit as well. The Commission lawsuit is based on their contention that distribution of the "disparity aid" portion of the tax bill is unconstitutional. As Council and staff have previously discussed, the 1988 tax reform legislation is detrimental to property owners in Mendota Heights, and similarly situated entities with high values, but low mill rates. It is also detrimental to the metropolitan area as a whole. The law purports to "equalize" tax burdens around the State, but in defining equity only in terms of mill rates, fails to recognize the sizeable and growing disparity in net taxes paid by homeowners in the metropolitan area, versus those in other areas of the State. It also fails to recognize the past decisions that officials in differing cities have made on spending and service levels, and to hold them accountable accordingly. Based on our discussions, and the presentation by MLC representative Bob Renner, Council has indicated its desire to support the legal challenge, including a financial contribution of $2,500. MLC member cities are being assessed $ .10 per capita, which in our case would be about $850. However, they have also increased their basic dues. Since we have not previously supported the MLC, an organization working on behalf of cities similar to Mendota Heights, a higher contribution to this effort may be appropriate. ACTION REQUIRED If Council wishes to participate, a proposed resolution is attached. You may wish to consider the amount of financial 40 contribution before passing the resolution. City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION SUPPORTING LEGAL CHALLENGE OF THE 1988 PROPERTY TAX LEGISLATION WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights has long endeavored to control spending levels, and maintain reasonable taxes in the community; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature, for the past several sessions, has continued to pass property tax bills that penalize cities like Mendota Heights; and WHEREAS, the 1988 Legislature passed a property tax reform bill that will eventually lead to substantially higher property tax bills for Mendota Heights residents; and WHEREAS, that bill purports to equalize tax burdens around the State, but fails to take into account the substantially higher tax bills already being paid by residents of cities such as Mendota Heights; and WHEREAS, 64% of State revenues are now collected in the metropolitan area, while only 46% of the total aids and credits to local governments are returned to the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the 1988 tax bill will result in the shift of even more monies from the metropolitan area to the remainder of the State; and WHEREAS, the Municipal Legislative Commission and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities have voted to undertake a legal challenge to the constitutionality of the 1988 tax bill. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the Council supports the legal challenge to the tax bill, and hereby authorizes the payment of $2,500 from the General Fund balance to the Municipal Legislative Commission to assist in defraying the cost of the lawsuit. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the legislators representing the City of Mendota Heights are hereby petitioned to actively pursue passage of a more equitable property tax bill during the 1989 session. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 19th day of July, 1988. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk LMUNICIPAL ( COMMISSION CONSTITUTIONAL LEci1sLAT1vF- CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO THE DISPARITY AID SECTION OF THE 1988 OMNIBUS TAX BILL 15oo Northland Plaza 3800 West Both Street Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 (612) 893-6650 Minnesota Constitution Article X, Section 1, reads in part: "Taxes shall be uniform upon the same class of subjects and shall be levied and collected for public purposes... (emphasis added) Article 4, Section 26, Subd. 3 of the 1988 Omnibus Tax Bill * establishes a "disparity reduction aid" which has the effect of "buying down" local government mill rates to approximately 128 mills. The cost of this program is $63.2 million in 1989. If the combined mill rate of schools, counties and cities exceeds 128 mills, -the State will provide disparity aid to local units of government to be used to reduce the mill rate to 128. This policy is not in itself unconstitutional. If the State Legislature desires to establish a statewide maximum mill rate, they have the constitutional authority to do so. However, the method the Legislature adopted to distribute disparity aid creates anonuniform tax on the same class of subjects and is therefore constitutionally flawed. A nonuniform tax result occurs because disparity aid is distributed to local units of government but the aid cannot be used to lower the tax rate citywide or countywide or throughout the school district but rather it can be used only to lower the tax rate within a portion of a city, county or school district. The result is that a taxpayer living in a home with.identical market values and receiving identical local services will pay a higher tax rate living on the west side of the street than one living on the east side of the street. This results in an unconstitutional distribution, and the Court will be asked to enjoin the distribution of these funds. Municipal Legislative Commission June 9, 1988 Member Cities: Bloomington, Brooklyn Pariz, Burnsville, Eagan, Eden Prairie. Edina, Inver Grove Heights. Maple Grove. Maplewood. Minnetonka, 131 mouth. Roseville. Shoreview, White Bear 1,alze, Woodbury HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE OF DISTRIBUTION RID FORMULA City of Smith County of Jones / School District Main School W Street District $68,000 Home �l $68,00(00 Home / Levy on ' Levy on City of Smith Levy 25 mills 25 mills County of Jones Levy 38 mills 38 mills School District W Levy 65 mills -- School District E levy -- 7% mills 128 mills 138 mills Because Home f21s levy exceeds 128 mills, state paid disparity aid is used to "buy down" 10 mills. Lets assume the cost of this buydown is $206,000, i.e., $20D,O0O of disparity aid is sent to local units of government located in School District E to reduce the total mill rate from 138 to 128. The law requires that this buydown be distributed to local units in proportion to the total levy. The City of Smith, which levies 181 of the total levy of 138 mills, would receive 189 of the disparity aid,. 189 x $200,.000 - $36,000 The County of Jones, which levies 279 of the total levy, would -receive 279 of the disparity aid. 279 x $200,000 - $54,000. School District E, which levies 55% of the total levy, would receive 559 of the disparity aid. 559 x $200,000 - $110,000. If the City of Smith and the County of Jones were authorized by statute to spread this aid citywide and countywide, there would not be a constitutional question. But the law requires that the aid be spread only in the portion of the city and county where the mill rate exceeds 128 mills, i.e., within the boundaries of School District E. After the distribution of disparity aid, the effective tax rates (and equivalent mill rates) would appear as illustrated below: Home it Home !2 Hill ETR Mill ETR .Rate Rate City of Smith 25.0 .0020 23.2 .0018 County of Jones 38.0 .0030 35.3 .0027 School District E -- -- 69.5 .0055 School District W 65.0 ,0050 - -- Total 128.0 .0100 128.0 .0100 The resulting taxes will be: Home #1 Ham t City of Smith Tax $136.00 $122.40 County of Jones Tax 204.00 183.60 School District E Tax -- 374.00 School District W Tax 340.00 - Total Tax ` $680.00 $680.00 The constitutional argument will be that a person residing in a $68,000 home in the City of Smith would pay a nonuniform tax for identical city services -- $136.00 vs. $122.40. The same person would also pay a nonuniform county tax -- $204.00 vs. $103.60 for identical county services. The same person would pay a unlf5lr7Il school tax, even though the amounts are different for the same home. Since the taxpayer is in a dJJJmxeat school district, they are not considered within the same class of subjects and therefore this portion of the distribution would be constitutional. Municipal Legislative Commission Junc 9, 1906 s DISPARITY REDUCTION AID * $63.2 million in Disparity Reduction Aid to be distributed in 1989; frozen amounts to be distributed in 1990 and thereafter. * Disparity aid provided mainly to areas where total mill rates exceed 128 mills (excludes mills due to school debt and school referenda) * Approximately $54.3 million in Disparity Reduction Aid will be provided within 521 cities, but this aid must be shared among local units (cities, counties, schools) in proportion to their levies ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ DISPARITY REDUCTION AID: 1989 DISTRIBUTION DISPARITY RED. # OF CITIES NON -METRO AREA AID DISTRIBUTED RECEIVING fajor cities/regional centers .............. $21.2 million 42 Moderate size/sub-regional centers......... 13.8 million 234 Taconite areas ............................. 12.1 million 30 Cities under 500 population ................ 2.5 million 201 TOTAL NON -METRO ............................. 49.6 million 507 METRO AREA Minneapolis ................................ 2.4 million 1 St. Paul.. ................. 2.0 million 1 Suburban cities .........:.................. 0.3 million 12 TOTAL METRO ................................ 4.7 million 14 TOTAL ....:................................. 54.3 million 521 Source: House Research Department estimates. 4 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 15, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Radio Tower at New City Hall Gene Lane has obtained quotes for two types of radio towers (see pictures). 1. Mono Pole $4,200 2. PI Rod $2,500 One advantage of the mono pole over the PI Rod is that it is a safer pole because it is more difficult to climb. If the PI Road is selected it is recommended that a safety shroud be installed around the base to make it less climbable. ACTION REQUIRED: We need a new radio tower for City Hall, review the pole types and prices and select one. Funding for the pole will be included in upcoming transfer to City Hall fund. SECTION I - 5 P/N 100309 lb . SECTION 9-5 PyIN 100310 SECTION 3-5 P/N 100311 .24!— SECTION 4-5 PIN 10031.2 5ECTION.5-5 P/N 100313 :1-031 G12ADF- 513OLT5 AS NOTED X 4! PULL THD BOLT 12F-gD - PIN 100OG4- -2 12F-qD vif-w B TYP ANTENNA MOUNTINq viFw A TYP 5FCTIC)N CONNECTION 0 .5E.(ZTION DATA r--ECTI 10 M ADE: Ll P, ki 4-6 TION 5. ALLOWABLE LOAC)INq -3.0 FT2 ATJOP OF TOWC12- PIN 3IG 4 5.0 PT1 AT 30 BELOW TOP OF TDWEP AT 30 P51' IND LOAD. ACXDITINAL LOADINq MAY BE ACCOMODATED BY 12EMOVI Nq TOP ,5E(--TION.5 OF TOWER . 4. FINI51-1: HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED AFTEE2 FASOCATION ECTI -5. ALL WELDING TO CoNFoeM To AW5 5PECIFICATION5. 100 :2. MATF-121AL: (A) MEMBE125 9116; � LA2GE2 Rj-50,000 PSI (B) MF-MBE125 LES5 THAN *lr.-. F3.36,000 -36,000 P51 Em". UMIIMI 125--222-C F012 ZONE. -W, WITH WIND LOADING Nam go 10 p = ff "A wM nAni NO own -9 FEE ==C- MWAXINF6�LniUIZ", APPROVED BY OR pT p.TE PLYMOUTH. INDIANA 46563 VAR I&M gegm Wolm M kwffn WLn mem num I Wal R 0 G12ADF- 513OLT5 AS NOTED X 4! PULL THD BOLT 12F-gD - PIN 100OG4- -2 12F-qD vif-w B TYP ANTENNA MOUNTINq viFw A TYP 5FCTIC)N CONNECTION 0 HnME: ChRLEUISIDO r--ECTI 10 M ADE: Ll P, ki 4-6 TION 5. ALLOWABLE LOAC)INq -3.0 FT2 ATJOP OF TOWC12- PIN 3IG 4 5.0 PT1 AT 30 BELOW TOP OF TDWEP AT 30 P51' IND LOAD. ACXDITINAL LOADINq MAY BE ACCOMODATED BY 12EMOVI Nq TOP ,5E(--TION.5 OF TOWER . 4. FINI51-1: HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED AFTEE2 FASOCATION ECTI -5. ALL WELDING TO CoNFoeM To AW5 5PECIFICATION5. 100 :2. MATF-121AL: (A) MEMBE125 9116; � LA2GE2 Rj-50,000 PSI (B) MF-MBE125 LES5 THAN *lr.-. F3.36,000 -36,000 P51 I. TOWFE.I.A. 5TANDAP-D C? DESIGN CONFOIZM5 TO F -I. Go 125--222-C F012 ZONE. -W, WITH WIND LOADING AS NOTED. 10 C:,ENF-2AL NOTE -5 nAni NO .5• "A-'MODE-L,55A--2 5F -LF 5UPPOP-TINC.PI-ROD, INC. TOWF-12 ELEVATION TOW E p - APPROVED BY OR pT p.TE PLYMOUTH. INDIANA 46563 i L Standard Radio Mast 9 VALN10M., Valmont Industries WIRE INLET 7=6=. A rl q SQUARE TUBING 0 l 17, i E 1� 1 FJ z' SCH.40 PIPE TOP SIDE MOUNT ADJUSTABLE SIDE ARM 5` X 8" X 7/8" MIN. THK. HANDHOLE RIM SO -KSI POLE SHAFT WALL CP /4" 1/4`-2OUNC HEX HEAD STAINLESS STEEL SCREW ( 2 REQ" D. ) COVER HANDHOLE COVER CLIP 3/16` THK. H. R. M. S. SECTION A -A 5" x 8" HANDHOLE DETAIL iYP 3/4"-i0 UNC SQUARE NUT tS./4"-10 /4"-10 UNC EX NUT fp. UNC X 0 1/2" STEP BOLT UG POLE STEP DETAIL S. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 12, 1988 TO: Mayor, City Council and City "i i_t for FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: New Street Lights along Lexington Avenue DISCUSSION: Several meetings ago Councilmember Witt requested that the City in- stall a street light at the intersection of Lexington Avenue and Marie Avenue. Staff also received a request from a resident for a street light at Lexington Avenue and Avanti. I have forwarded these two requests onto Ms. Jean Steeves, NSP Customer Service Representative, for her recommendation and have received the following response'(see attached response and map). ACTION REQUIRED: Review the two lighting requests and give staff direction on whether or not to order the lights. Mn. Jtni Dante.e son City Eng-hzeen. C. -t y o6 Mendota He- qh t.s 750 SOLLth Plaza Dn-i,ve Mendota Height -5. MN 55120 Dealt Mme. Da.ntee-5on: Northern States Power Company May 10, 1988 Pen ou-t phone conve %zati,on o4 last week, I am encCo4tng a copy o,6 the Zette,,c. we rete-i.ved ��om F -,ed Kueppe.,c4, Jfc. , and a copy o4 our. map .ahuwtng the .e.ocat-L.ons o6 6.tn.eet-e-Z9ht5 being ,,equ"ted. In phy-6tcate.Cty checking the .Coca.ti.onz, I -p.,opo�se 6tn.ee,t Zt_qht,6 be tn.5ta22ed on the two po-ee-s I have Gvcc2ed on .the enc-P-o.sed map. There would be no change to the city 4o., tn,5ta,eZtng the. -se two zi q/lt-s, other. than the monthly cha.,Lge. That cha,,cge would depend on .the -5tze o� U_ght you wou-E'd pAe4en. to be -instatted. I would Suggest 100 Watt Htgh Pre �.5une Sodium .eights to both o4 the -6e Zoca.tton:s. PZea.se ,teutew these necommendatZon4 and Zet me know your dec i,6ton. I can be nea.ched at 458-1239. Stnce t.e ey , (40.f> rn. (A'1Y--0 Jean M. Steev" Cu.atome,L Se�r.v.i,ce Rep. FEED A. RUEPPEES FRED A. RUEPPERS, JR. JOAN M. HACHEL JOSEPH F.SUEPPERS KuEPPEns AND KuEPPERs ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 1350 380 NORTH WABASH& AT SIXTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 (012) 228-1104 March 21, 1988 Marketing Office Northern States Power Company 3000 Maxwell Avenue Newport, MN 55055 Dear Folks: We live at 1096 Avanti Drive in Mendota Heights, which is at the corner of Lexington Avenue and Avanti Drive. The area around the intersection is very dark at night. It is almost impossible to see the location of the intersection when approaching on Lexington Avenue. We are wondering if we could get a "alley light" installed at either or both of the electric power poles which are nearby on Lexington Avenue. Many years ago we arranged to have an "alley light" placed behind our home in the Crocus Hill area of St. Paul, and it was very helpful. We paid the cost with a part of our monthly NSP electric bill. Do you have such a program which we could use near our new residence? We would be glad to pay the monthly charge; or it may be that we will contact several of our neighbors to share in the charge. You can respond to this inquiry at either my office or residence address, or you may call my office number as shown above, or at our residence number, 452-7019. Very truly o , i' Fred A. Kue pers, Jr. FAKjr/nkm cc: City of Mendota Heights