The URL can be used to link to this page

1992-09-01-� r C CITY OF MENDOTA Hi3IGHTS DAROTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA September 1, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Adoption 4. Approval of August 18th Minutes. 5. Consent Calendar a. Acknowledgment of the August 25th Planning Commission Minutes. b. Approval of RESOLIITION NO. 92-55, Resolution Accepting Work and Approving Final Payment for Mendota Woods. c. Acknowledgment of the Building Activity Report for August. d. Acknowledgment of Information regarding City Council Meeting for September 15, 1992. e. Approval of Permanent Appointment to the Fire Department - Scott Henning, Iten Weisenburger and Gerald Nelson. f. Approval of RLSOLIITION NO. 92-56, Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Report for Reconstruction of Friendly Hills Streets. g. Approval of the List of Contractors. h. Approval of the List of Claims. * i. Approval to Expand Irrigation System at Kensington Park. Fnd of Consent Calendar 6. Public Commeats 7. Proclamatioa a. Child Protective Services Day - September 17, 1992 8.:•• Hearincr a. Assessment Roll Hearings: RESOLIITION N0. 92-57 - 7:45 P.M. - Lennox - Bridgeview Shores 3rd Addition - Mendota Woods 9. IIafinished and New Business a. Case No. 92-26: Wiessner - Variance. b. Case No. 92-27: Rabin - Variance. c. Update on Community Air Noise Issues. ,� � d. Discussion on Fsxamination of Thru-Street Option for the Arndt Plat. e. Discussion on Parking around Henry Sibley High School. f. Discussion on Topics for Discussion for September 29 � Joint Planning Commission/City Council Workshop. g. Discussion on Scheduling of Council Workshop for October. 10. Council Comments il. Ad�ourn Auxiliary sids for disabled persoas are available upon request at least 120 hours ia advaace. If a aotice of less thaa 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota 8eights will make every attempt to provide the sids, however, this may aot be possible oa short aotice. Please contact City Admiaistration at 452-1850 with requests. • E !• ' � I • September 1, 1992 TQ: Mayor and Ci�.y Council FROM: Tom Lawell, Ci.tg Adminis�. t SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for September lst Council Meeting One item has been added to the consen�. cal.endar (*). 3. Agenda Adoption It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda pra.nted on green paper . 5i. As�t�roval to Expand Irriga�iaa System at Reasiagton Park. Please see attached memo. MTL:kkb � CITY OF MENDOTA H$IGHTS DAKOTA COIINTY, MINNL�SOTA AGENDA September 1, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Adoption 4. Approval of August 18th Minutes. 5. Conseat Calendar a. Acknowledgment of the August 25th Planning Commission Minutes. b. Approval of RESOLIITION NO. 92-55, Resolution Accepting Work and Approving Final-Payment for Mendota Woods. c. Acknowledgment of the Building Activity Report for August. d. Acknowledgment of Information regarding City Council Meeting for September 15, 1992. e. Approval of Permanent Appointment to the Fire Department - Scott Henning, Ken Weisenburger and Gerald Nelson. f. Approval of RLSOLIITION NO. 92-56, Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Report for Reconstruction of Friendly Hills Streets. g. Approval of the List of Contractors. h. Approval of the List of Claims. End of Consent Calendar 6. Public Commeats 7. Proclamation a. Child Protective Services Day - September 17, 1992 8. HearinQ a. Assessment Roll Hearings: RESOLIITION NO. 92-57 - 7:45 P.M. - Lennox - Bridgeview Shores 3rd Addition - Mendota Woods 9. IInfinished aad New Busiaess a. Case No. 92-26: Wiessner - Variance. b. Case No. 92-27: Rabin - Variance. c. Update on Community Air Noise Issues. d. D�scussian an Examina�ion of Thru-Street Op�ion for the Arndt Pla�. ' e. Discussian on Parking araund Henry Sibley High School. f. Discu�sian on Topics for Discussion �or Sep�ember 29 Joint Plar�ning Commis�ion/City Council Workshop, g, Discu�sion on Scheduling of Council Work�hop for October. 10. Caun.cil Comments 11. Adjourn Au�ciliary aids for disabled persons are available upoa request at least 120 hours ia advance. Tf a uotice of less thaa 12p hours is receivad, the Ci�y of Meadata Heights rai11 make every attemp� ta provide the aids, hawever, this may aot be possible on short notice. Please coataet City Admiaistratiaa at 452-1850 with requests. e .R :�, Page No. 3384 August 18, 1992 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, August 18, 1992 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Cummins, Koch and Smith. Councilmember Blesener had notified the Council that she would be absent. AGENDA ADOPTION Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 Abstain: Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 Abstain: 1 Cummins 1 Koch Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of the revised agenda for the meeting. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the minutes of the July 7, 1992 regular meeting. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Councilmember Smith moved approval of the minutes of the July 21, 1992 regular meeting. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the minutes of the August 4,•1992 regular meeting. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the consent calendar for the meeting along with authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein. .a. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the August 11th Park and Recreation Commission meeting. b. Adoption of Resolution No. 92-49, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR MENDAKOTA COMMUNITY PARK �J Page No. 3385 August 18, 1992 (IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 6I,)" awarding final payment to Friedges Landscaping, Inc., in the amount of $4,328.00. c. Authorization for the installation of two hot air hand dryers at the Mendakota Park concession building at a cost of approximately $400 per unit, funded by referendum proceeds. d. Approval of the purchase and installation of a lockbox for ballfield equipment at Mendakota Park, for a cost of approximately $330. e. Approval of the purchase and installation of a 7 foot backstop hood at the Civic Center and Friendly Hills ballfields from Fence Co. for its low quote of $1,137.50 (Friendly Hills) and $1,165.00 (Civic Center) . f. Approval of an amended Gun Club Lake W.M.O. Joint Powers Agreement and authorization for its execution by the Mayor and City Clerk. g. Approval of a request from Visitation School for the reservation of the Roger's Lake tennis courts Monday through Friday, August 17 through October 20, 1992, from 3:15 P.M. until 5:30 P.M. h. Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's monthly report for July. i. Approval of the issuance of a building permit to McDonalds for interior and exterior remodeling at its facility located at 2020 Dodd Road. j. Approval of an Architect's Agreement with Station 19 Architects for the Public Works Garage expansion, based on "not to exceed" fees of $8,500 for the design phase and $13,500 for construction drawing preparation, along with authorization for execution of the agreement by the Mayor. k. Authorization for the purchase of a Ford L8000 dump truck from Boyer Ford through the State Contract at a price of $41,995, and purchase of miscellaneous equipment Page No. 3386 August 18, 1992 from the following bidders: dump body, McQueen Equipment, $8,965; plow McQueen Equipment, $12,900; wings, $9,270, McQueen Equipment; sander, $2,400, McQueen Equipment; lights, $2,000 bidder to be determined, 2-way radio, $1,000, bidder to be determined; spring support system, $400, bidder to be determined, financing to be provided by equipment certificates. 1. Adoption of Resolution No. 92-50, 'A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING REGIONAL TRAILS IN DAKOTA COUNTY." m. Authorization to advertise for bids to mill and overlay Marie Avenue from Dodd Road to Delaware Avenue, financing for the project to be provided by MSA maintenance funds. n. Adoption of Resolution No. 92-51, ""RESOLUTION APPROVING TENTATIVE 1992 LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 1993," and Resolution No. 91-52, "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL 1992 TAX LEVY FOR SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT NO. 1 COLLECTIBLE IN 1993." o. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the NDC-4 meetings held on June 3rd and July 1st. p. Adoption of Resolution No. 92-53, "RESOLUTION APPOINTING 1992 ELECTION JUDGES." q. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated August 18, 1992 and attached hereto. r. Approval of the list of claims dated August 18, 1992 and totalling $303,351.63. s. Adoption of an agreement entitled "Supplement #2 to the Existing Cooperation Agreement for the Dakota County Community Development Block Program," and authorization for its execution by the Mayor. t. Adoption of Resolution No. 92-54, "RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATED SALE OF $250,000 GENERAL Page No. 3387 August 18, 1992 OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES OF 1992." Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 PUBLIC CONIl�IENTS PARK CELEBRATION REPORT Administrative Assistant Batchelder reviewed his report on the success of the first annual Celebrate Mendota Heights Park Day. 1992 AUDIT FIRST AVENUE TRAFFIC Council expressed its appreciation to Assistant Batchelder and all contributors and volunteers involved in planning and conducting the celebration. Mr. Steve Laible, from Peat Marwick, presented and reviewed the 1991 City Audit for Council and the audience. Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works Director Danielson in response to a letter from Mrs. Mary Becker regarding traffic speeds on First Avenue. Mrs. Becker, present for the discussion, agreed with the Public Works Director's recommendation that additional 30 mile per hour speed limit signs are not appropriate and supports the installation of "slow - children" signs. Mayor Mertensotto observed that there are signs in St. Paul within a two-block area of schools which limit speeds to 20 miles per hour when children are present. He pointed out that First Avenue is within two blocks of Somerset School and suggested that this possibility be pursued. Attorney Hart responded that he is not aware of any legal justification for such signs but that he has seen special speed zones for school areas. Administrator Lawell stated that the City would have to make a special request to Mn/DOT for a school zone speed limit. Councilmember Smith asked if the "slow - children" signs would be more appropriate and � � 4 �� Page No. 3388 August 18, 1992 felt that they would serve as a reasonable reminder to drivers. Mrs. Becker responded that she would appreciate whatever action the city will take. Staff was directed to contact Mn/DOT with respect to establishing a school zone speed limit. PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT, Council acknowledged a memo from Administra- MENDOTA SCHOOL tive Assistant Batchelder regarding a request from the Mendota School PTA requesting funding to install play equipment at the Mendota Elementary School. The PTA has raised approximately $15,000 for the purchase of the equipment, and under a proposed formula, the PTA would purchase the equipment, the city would provide installation costs, not to exceed $6,924, and the school district would provide funding, not to exceed $7,789, for upgrades and improvements necessary to meet ADA standards. Mayor Mertensotto stated that the city has received a letter from Dr. Bruce Anderson stating that he will recommend to the School Board that $7,789 be committed for ADA improvements. He pointed out that the Parks and Recreation Commission has recommended approval of the City-provided installation of equipment but expressed concern over setting a precedent - a similar request could come from Somerset School in the future. Mrs. Carol Kiemele, representing the Mendota School PTA, stated that a precedent was set when the city worked with the high school. She pointed out that the PTA would be paying the majority of the expenses through PTA funding. Mayor Mertensotto agreed that a precedent had been set when the Joint Powers Agreement was approved for Sibley. He stated that there should be a commitment to a joint powers agreement between the city and school district that provides that the facilities will be available to the community when they are not being used during school hours. Administrator Lawell responded that neighborhood children do use the facilities outside of school hours and that any � Page No. 3389 August 18, 1992 investment of city funds should be accompanied by an agreement that the equipment will always be available for Mendota Heights residents during off-school hours. With respect to Somerset School, he stated that improvements have been made to its equipment recently and the school district will likely be faced with ADA costs. Mayor Mertensotto stated that the PTA must dedicate the equipment to the school district, and the district's liability insurer would have to cover the liability. Councilmember Smith moved to approve an expenditure of Special Park Funds not to exceed $6,924 for the installation of play equipment at Mendota Elementary School and to authorize the Mayor to execute a Letter of Agreement with Independent School District 197 to stipulate that the school district will fund all ADA upgrades, at a cost not to exceed $7,789, and that the district will make the play equipment available to all city residents during non-school hours. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 ASSOCIATED BUREAU5 Council acknowledged a memo from the City TAX INCREMENT REQUEST Administrator relative to a request from Associated Bureaus for tax increment financing for a 65,000 square foot office facility proposed to be located on a 13 acre site on Commerce Drive. Mr. Jack Hurley, CEO of Associated Bureaus (ABI), gave Council and the audience a background on the company, explaining that the firm has outgrown its current facility and would like to construct a 65,000 square foot facility in the Mendota Heights Business Park. He explained that ABI will purchase a 13+ acre site and has an option on 6 additional acres for future expansion. Mr. George Burkhards, from United Property, informed Council that after expansion, one- ninth of the 20 acre site will be building. Development in the former MAC site will never achieve the building coverage allowed by the MAC. � Page No. 3390 August 18, 1992 Councilmember Cummins stated that from the perspective of Council on generation of tax revenue, small building on large sites, it is possible that not enough tax potential is gained for the site. Mr. Burkhards responded that a typical building on the site would be office/warehouse, but this structure will ba all office, which is much more costly and would generate a better tax base. Architect Wayne Bishop, reviewed the proposed site plan, explaining that a 65,000 square foot, single story building, finished on all four sides with a brick and architectural split face block for accent, is proposed. He explained the configuration and amenities of the proposed structure and stated that there will be an extraordinary amount of landscaping and an upscale arrival point. The total building cost is estimated at $3.3 million. Parking spaces for 610 cars is planned to be constructed all at one time to provide for anticipated needs in five years. The interior space will be completely finished, one wing will be classic divided office space, and the other will be a large open office area. He then described the guest arrival area. Administrator Lawell informed Council that the proposal is unique in terms of timing - the developer is not here this evening to review exact details or plans, but is responding to a staff request to bring the matter before Council prior to planning and engineering consideration because of the request for tax increment assistance. Mr. Jim Casserley, financial consultant for ABI, responded to questions on valuation of the facility, stating that although the construction cost will possibly be $60 to $65 per square foot, its market value will likely be closer to $49 per square foot. He further stated that he suspects that taxes will be greater than were estimated in the spreadsheet (Exhibit A) which he prepared and was submitted to Council with the agenda materials. Councilmember Smith stated that the original tax capacity of the site, shown on the spreadsheet, is zero but in past projects the tax capacity at the time of the project has been used. Page No. 3391 August 18, 1992 Treasurer Shaughnessy responded that t tax base on the property when it was plac 1n the TIF was zero because it was owned by When the land was purchased by United properties it consisted af 100 parcels, and all were placed back on the tax rolls at the time, but without a final plat the total value of the property cannot be divided to determine the value of the subject parcel. He stated that the County Assessor will come up with a value for the parcel some time in 1993. Councilmember Smith stated that the information will have to be made available to Council when the property is platted. Mr. Casserley responded that he will work with Treasurer Shaughnessy and the Council and will put into the spread sheet the amount that is then arrived at. Mayor Mertensotto stated that this is probably the largest parcels United Properties is developing in the park and that Council is concerned that the city will get something substantial. With respect to proposed items to be covered by TIF, Councilmember Smith stated that she always uses the but-for rule and that one of the things she has a question over is the landscaping and whether it should be part of the funding. Mr. Casserly responded that different communities allow different things - some assist in unusual costs but do not provide assistance for items required by code. He further stated that the extent of TIF assistance is a policy decision. Mayor Mertensotto expressed concern about the parking area and run-off, and the request for $10,000 in TIF for ponds and $50,000 for landscaping. He pointed out that Council wants to be sure that there will be no run-off problems. He stated that he hopes that the developer will not come back for additional TIF. Mr. Casserly responded that he hopes there will be some latitude but that the requested $696,150 in TIF should be the maximum requested for the project. Page No. 3392 August 18, 1992 Mr. Hurley stated that if his professionals have done their jobs, no additional funds will be requested. He informed Council that he hopes to begin construction in March. Mayor Mertensotto responded that if the developers stick with the project as presented this evening, Council will likely look on it favorably. SOFTBALL CLASSIC Council acknowledged a memo from the Administrative Assistant regarding a reques"t from Matt Blair Celebrity Promotions (MBSP) to conduct the 1993 Twin Cities Celebrity Softball Classic at Mendakota Park. Ms. Amy Rothbauer, from Matt Blair Celebrity Promotions, reviewed the request and responded to Council questions. She explained that the tournament would likely draw a crowd of about 2,000 people, that parking would be handled by the parking lot, the overflow parking area, on-street parking and shuttle buses to parking at the Mendota Plaza. Portable satellites would be provided, and the round-robin tournament would take place from 8:00 a.m. to about 6:00 p.m. Councilmember Smith stated that the park has not yet experienced such a large crowd, so it is not known whether the size can be accommodated. She also stated that not much thought has yet been given to use of the facilities by outside groups. She asked staff whether there are any other park activities that the event might impact, such as regular tournaments which might be scheduled on the requested date. Administrator Lawell responded that the event should not conflict with any scheduled community events, since softball is scheduled during the week and the regular tournament would occur in mid-summer. He felt that perhaps the date would work in 1993 but that it might be a problem in future years. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that with a crowd of 2,000, traffic and crowd control could be a burden on city facilities and public safety. Ms. Rothbauer responded that MBSP would work with the city to bring any extra police � Page No. 3393 August 18, 1992 protection, and that in the last event at the City of Shakopee, the police service was volunteered. The city provided constant drive-bys, MBSP provided security officers and worked with a local hospital to provide a medical tent. Councilmember Smith stated that such a large activity could cause damage to the facility in some way, and the city would have to deal with down time, which would impact the community. She asked if staff had made inquiries of other communities where the event has been held to see what experience they had. Administrative Assistant Batchelder responded that the event was held at the University of Minnesota in its first year and in Shakopee the second year. He stated that he has not contacted Shakopee. Councilmember Cummins asked'if the Police and Fire Departments had been asked to comment on the request. Administrative Assistant Batchelder responded that Chief Delmont stated that he had no concerns about the event and pointed out that basketball tournaments at Sibley High School generally draw about 2,000 people and there have been no traffic control problems. It was the consensus to direct staff to contact the City of Shakopee to see if it had any adverse impact and to refer the request to the Police and Fire Departments for review and recommendation. FEASIBILITY REPORT Council acknowledged receipt of a feasibility ARNDT PLAT report for proposed improvements to serve the Arndt plat located between London Road and Butler Avenue. Mayor Mertensotto stated that he has spoken to the Arndt family and that they feel the estimated $15,000 assessment per lot is excessive for such a small plat. They felt that the original proposal to extend London Road through the plat would be more cost effective. Public Works Director Danielson responded that the reason the assessment estimate is higher than normal is because the owners have asked that grading be done and assessed as part of � Page No. 3394 August 18, 1992 the project. He stated that assessments for two other projects in which the city contractor did the grading, the Patrick subdivision and the Alice Lane subdivision, were $14,000 to $15,000 per lot, which compares favorably to the estimated cost for the Arndt assessments. With respect to a question from Mayor Mertensotto on trails, Engineer Eckles stated that there were two options for the trail connection, from Butler Avenue through the easement to London Road, and also from Butler to Kirchner through a vacated section. He stated that it may be possible to delete the section of trail on existing Kirchner Avenue since it is a low volume street. The savings would be approximately $2,500. He stated that the trail objective is to link Kirchner to Butler and London to Butler. He stated that $15,000 per lot is high for assessments, however, the actual cost of the normal construction is only about $10,000 per lot - about $4,500 per lot is added because of the grading, which is generally done by a plat developer. A typical assessment for new lots is between $10,000 and $13,000 per lot. He informed Council that because little is known about the soil conditions it is difficult to estimate costs and he has been very cautious - he hopes the project can be done for less than is estimated. Councilmember Smith asked if staff is comfortable with having the lot grading done by the city contractor. Mr. Eckles responded that city contractors have done street grading in the past and some lot grading, but lot grading involves things the contractor does not normally have to contend with, like erosion control and being sure drainage does not go outside the plat and building pads. Mayor Mertensotto asked what responsibility the developer's surveyor has for the grading plan. Mr. Eckles responded that the surveyor must provide a plan showing that the site is graded properly and that it satisfies the city's grading requirements. City staff will have to work out details on what is acceptable in grading and what the city will be responsible for - as an example, black dirt in a building pad would normally be taken care of at the time of grading, etc. � Page No. 3395 August 18, 1992 Councilmember Smith asked why the developers requested that grading be assessed and why the city was asked to do the grading. Engineer Eckles responded that initially everyone thought there would not be much grading involved in the lots, that they would just be touched up, but once the developers' engineer started looking at the grades on site he found that the,density of lots requires quite a bit of grading. Mayor Mertensotto stated that putting in a cul-de-sac to accommodate the neighbors is being borne by the developers and that it has added to the project costs. Councilmember Cummins pointed out that the issue is whether the city gets involved in the grading for the development. He stated that the city never done the site grading for an entire development and would be incurring some liability. He felt that the developer should perform the grading. Councilmember Smith stated that a cul-de-sac will likely create greater lot values, and that lots on cul-de-sacs sell at a premium. She agreed that the city should not do the grading and include the cost in the assessments. Engineer Eckles stated that utility-wise it would not be any cheaper to build a through street. He further stated that the city must be sure that each lot is graded properly and the best way to do that is to grade the site all at once. He informed Council that the city could do the street grading as part of the city project but that it is best for all parties when an entire site is graded at once, including the streets. Mayor Mertensotto stated that the city should also look at the through street option. Engineer Eckles stated that the developer originally proposed a through street and that was the original concept from the city planner, but after neighborhood input and Planning Commission consideration, the cul-de- sac was the option chosen. � Page No. 3396 August 18, 1992 Mayor Mertensotto stated that it did not appear to increase the costs much but should go back to look at what the costs would be for a through street, which would eliminate the pedway between Lots 6 and 7. Administrator Lawell asked what Council's intent would be once costs for a through street are determined, whether the neighborhood would be invited back. Mayor Mertensotto responded that the neighbors would have to be involved. Councilmember Cummins stated that a hearing has been held and the cul-de-sac option was recommended as a result of the hearing. He did not know why Council should now go back to the through-street concept. He stated that he did not recall an estimate for assessments that has not been less than $1,500 over what was actually assessed, and that the . assessments have often been $3,000 less�than the estimate. If history is a guide, the assessments for the project would come in closer to $12,000 than $15,000. Engineer Eckles responded that he always estimates conservatively, and in this case (there are more unknowns in soil conditions and grading), he has been more cautious. He explained that two to three weeks will be needed to bid the project and that it could be October before the project starts, which may only allow two weeks of construction this year. Mayor Mertensotto asked if the project could be started in the spring. Public Works Director Danielson responded that spring would be a typical time to start a project but it is preferable to install utilities in the fall if possible to allow for settling before street construction. Engineer Eckles informed Council that if the developer does the grading, the assessment cost would be at about $10,000 per lot, which is in the same range as past projects. Councilmember Cummins moved to table the matter to September 1st and to direct staff to Page No. 3397 August 18, 1992 provide information on the through street option. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 IVY FALLS CREEK Council acknowledged a report from Engineer FUNDING OPTIONS Eckles regarding funding options for Ivy Falls Creek drainage improvements. Engineer Eckles summarized the report and answered Council questions. Councilmember Cummins suggested that the TIF option be dropped, stating that he did not think it is appropriate and felt that it would be a dishonest use of TIF. Councilmember Smith agreed, stating that Council should not use TIF to reduce assessments. She further stated that she had suggested the use of TIF to build a holding pond on city property, which would benefit everyone and that by suggesting TIF she had no intention of directly reducing assessments. Councilmember Cummins stated that the project would generate no increment and that building a holding pond would bring no benefit to the tax increment district, because the project would be a reconstruction project in a residential area. Mayor Mertensotto stated that if the TIF goes to benefit all ta�ayers in the city, its use would do no harm, and in this case the funding clearly would benefit all tax payers. Councilmember Smith stated that there is a storm run-off problem and if a holding pond is created on city property through TIF, reducing the total cost of the project, everyone in the district would benefit, and it would be a rehabilitation project. She further stated that there would be erosion on the Brassard property any way, but not at the same rate as taking all the runoff from half of the city. Engineer Eckles responded that staff is concerned about setting a precedent for use of TIF in the resolution of similar problems in tYie future. Councilmember Smith pointed out that the city is doing the same type of project in the tax increment district and not charging adjacent property owners, and stated ti Page No. 3398 August 18, 1992 that she did not view this project as being much different. Councilmember Cummins stated that he feels the project is much different. He did not think that the Ivy Falls Creek project is appropriate for tax increment funding and that he is inclined to prefer that Council deal with the matter in a much more straight forward manner. He stated that by approving the project, Council would be incurring city expenses for a necessary project and tax payers must pay for it. He felt that a storm utility would be a better option, a straight forward and honest method of dealing with the issue. Councilmember Koch asked if the can be stopped in the future or always remain in place if it is storm utility if it will instituted. Engineer Eckles responded that Council would set the rates and the rates can be changed. He stated that it is appropriate to start the utility with a higher rate to cover future costs but that it should benefit the entire city ultimately even though initially it would benefit the creek. Councilmember Cummins stated that ultimately the entire city will need storm sewer work and the entire city will eventually benefit. Mayor Mertensotto stated that the utility is another means of generating funds, and that storm utilities are used by other communities. The Ivy Falls Creek is the first project begging to be done, and the question is how storm sewer repairs will be handled in the future. He pointed out that, like the street rehabilitation policy, Council must plan for the future. Councilmember Koch stated that it appears that there is the possibility of having the storm water utility that would fund 90� of the Ivy Falls Creek project. She asked if the utility would be in place for 20 years if it is instituted after public hearing. Engineer Eckles responded that it would fund 90�, it would be in place for 20 years, and that part of the issue this evening is whether the 80/20� split is appropriate. If a greater r Page No. 3399 August 18, 1992 city participation is desired, staff must calculate how to make a formula work. The potential financing methods to fund a 20 year bond for the project are a sanitary sewer surcharge, TIF or a storm water utility. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that storm utility rates would have to increase each time a storm sewer project is initiated. Treasurer Shaughnessy stated that the other projects identified extend out about 10 years, at a cost of about $600,000 to $700,000, so that staff has projected total storm sewer utility income to the point where it would cover those projects over a 30 year period. Some of the projects are of the type where there would be no assessments possible. Councilmember Smith stated that Council has been told that under certain scenarios 20� of the Ivy Creek project must be assessed. Treasurer Shaughnessy responded that under the improvement bond law, at least 20� of the costs must be assessed. Using either a storm sewer utility or sanitary sewer surcharge, the city can issue revenue bonds and would not have to assess 20�, and as long as sufficient revenue is designated to meet bond payments, a referendum is not required. Councilmember Smith responded that she feels that some direct assessment is appropriate but that the proposed assessments were much to high. With respect to storm utility rates, Engineer Eckles stated that the proposed rate for industrial properties is below the rates charged by other cities, but if Council feels it is too high, it could consider allowing property owners to apply for adjustments. Staff could then look at whether a property has holding ponds on site and, if the property run off does not impact the city, a reduced rate may be possible. Councilmember Smith stated that some sites have holding ponds that handle run-off from other properties as well, and also in some cases the city is paying for holding ponds, so some properties would have a double benefit. � Page No. 3400 August 18, 1992 Engineer Eckles agreed, stating that review of adjustment requests would be very complicated. Councilmember Smith felt that, based on the discussion, the city portion of funding for the project should be somewhere between 85 and 90�. She supported the idea of creating a storm utility. Mayor Mertensotto felt that staff should contact communities which use a storm utility, in addition to those already contacted. Councilmember Smith asked what cost the city would incur in operating and setting up a storm water utility. Engineer Eckles responded that the biggest cost would be in the initial setup but the utility charges would be collected with sewer bills and afterwards the utility should take only a minor amount of staff time, although engineering would have to be involved in adjustment requests. Mayor Mertensotto suggested that staff put together a package consisting of what projects rieed to be done, funding options, cost estimates for Ivy Falls Creek and a recommendation on whether on�e of the reaches should be dropped from the project. He felt that all of the information should be put into a single report so that Council can look at the�� picture again. Treasurer Shaughnessy stated that the original financing program was set up to run 30 years and it included anticipated projects which need to be done over the next 10 years. One of the factors in the original calculations was a small tax levy each year so that enough of a reserve could be built to handle the future projects. Administrator Lawell stated that a decision must be made on whether to fund a 20 year Ivy Falls Creek program or include the other anticipated projects for a 30 year program. Mayor Mertensotto responded that initial cost will be for Ivy Falls Creek and will be paid over a 20 year period and Council needs to know how much money will be needed each year to fund Ivy Falls Creek and the other r Page No. 3401 August 18, 1992 anticipated projects, using h options of a sanitary sewer surcharge and storm utility. He further stated, with respect to Ivy Falls, that Council must have a program to show how much is assessable. Council must have the total picture, not just Ivy Falls Creek, so that it will know the impact. He asked that staff put the information into a composite and make a comparison between a 90/10� and 80/20� distribution of the costs. It was the consensus that Council conduct a workshop in October for discussion of funding options. AIR NOISE UPDATE Council acknowledged an air noise update memo from Administrator Lawell, informing Council that MAC officials, at the August 6th MAC Corridor Task Force meeting, rejected the city's proposal for a 60 degree fanned corridor and indicated their intent to endorse the 15 degree procedure and recommend its implementation to the FAA. Mayor Mertensotto stated that he suspects that the MAC'will send its staff recommendation to MASAC for review and that MAC will likely adopt some of the procedures that were used during the 60 day test, such as direct take- off down the center of the corridor in the early morning hours. He seriously doubted that the City will get the fanned corridor test. Administrator Lawell stated that he believes MAC will direct a change in procedure policy getting planes in the middle of the corridor during non-peak times but that they will not recommend a fanned corridor during peak operations, but will rather affect the 15 degree cone, which has not been the city's goal. Mayor Mertensotto stated that the air noise data being collected by MAC is quantitative, objective data. MAC is working on the ANOMS system program and once running, it should work in the city's favor, measuring noise events over a 20 second period. He stated that Council must keep after MAC to get the system approved so that the data can be released. . + •4 Page No. 3402 August 18, 1992 Administrator Lawell stated that in terms of the proposal to go to a 15 degree corridor, that is not what the city has asked for. He felt the city should go on record that it does not agree with the proposal and should draft a resolution to present at the MAC meeting of September 21st. He further stated that staff will prepare a formal response for Council review after the MAC staff recommendation is received. He pointed out that the City of Inver Grove Heights shares the aircraft noise concerns and would like to join with Mendota Heights. It was the consensus to direct the City Administrator to draft a letter to MASAC stating the Council's objection to a 15 degree cone and a resolution for Council adoption on September 1st. KIRCHNER PROPERTY Council acknowledged a memo from Treasurer Shaughnessy regarding the Kirchner property adjacent to the old fire station site and recommending that negotiations for purchase of the site by the city be resumed. It was the consensus of Council to direct staff to prepare and submit a purchase offer to Mr. Kirchner based on the appraisal previously done by the City, the offer to be contingent on the condition that the property is brought up to PCA and EPA standards. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmember Koch moved that the meeting be adjourned. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:26 o'clock P.M. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk �r � LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY C4UNCIL August 18, 1992 Excava�ion - Stoney River Development Ron-son Contracting, Inc. General Coatraetors License Tom's Canstruction CITY OF MENDOTA HLIGHTS DAKOTA COIINTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING CONII�SISSION AIIGIIST 25, 1992 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, August 25, 1992, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Koll, Dreelan, Dwyer, Krebsbach, Duggan and Tilsen. Commissioner Friel was excused. Also present were Public Works Director Jim Danielson, Planning Consultant Tim Malloy, Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser. APPROVAL OF MINUPLS Commissioner Minutes with Commissioner AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 ABSTAIN: 2, DREELAN DIIGGAN Dreelan moved approval of the July 28, 1992 corrections. Duggan seconded the motion. ACi�TOWLEDGMENT OF MEMO ON WAIVING OF PLANNING APPLICATION FEES The Planning Commission acknowledged a memorandum submitted by Administrative Assistant Batchelder regarding City Council's direction to inform the Planning Commission that the City incurs costs for preparation of reports and advertising and the Commission should be very careful in making recommendations for fee waivers . CONTINIIED HEARING: � CASI3 NO. 92-23: 'rR'�T�DSON DEVrsLOPN�NT - CIIP, VARIANCLS AND SIIBDIVISION Chair Dwyer explained Tharaldson Development is requesting a Conditional Use Permit, Variances and Subdivision to allow the construction of a 120 unit hotel in the Mendota Heights Business Park. He stated this request was continued from the July Planning Commission meeting, as requested by the applicant, to provide the applicant adequate time to address issues mentioned in the Planner's Report. He explained, at the July meeting, that the Commission had briefly discussed the requested proposal and directed City staff to advise Tharaldson Development of comments/questions the Commission had August 25, 1992 Page 2 noted in reviewing the submitted materials. He stated that since the July meeting, Tharaldson Development had responded to some of the comments/questions the Commission had discussed. Chair Dwyer stated that because staff felt that some of the information Tharaldson Development had submitted was inadequate, Tharaldson Development had agreed to continue the hearing to the September 22, 1992 Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Krebsbach informed the Commission that she had recently stayed in a Fairfield Hotel in Kansas City. which is the same hotel which is proposed for the business park area by Tharaldson Development. She stated the hotel in Kansas City seemed to more attractive, had balconies and larger windows than the hotel as proposed by Tharaldson Development. Commissioner Rrebsbach informed the Commission that the Marriott manages the Fairfield Hotel in Kansas City. In response to a question from the Commission, Public Works Director Danielson stated the nearest Fairfield Hotel is located in St. Cloud, Minnesota. Commissioner Duggan moved to continue the Conditional Use Permit, Variances and Subd.ivision hearing to 7:30 P.M. on September 22, 1992. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 CASE NO. 92-26: �IESSNER - VARIANCi3 Mr. Glen Wiessner, of 1876 Valley Curve, was present to discuss his request for a variance to allow the construction of a 10 foot by 12 foot storage shed in the front yard of his property. Mr. Wiessner briefly explained that his front yard functions as his back yard, as do all his neighbors on Valley Curve. He stated the shed would be visible to only two of his neighbors. He stated he has received signatures of consent from his surrounding neighbors. Chair Dwyer questioned if there will be trees removed. Mr. Wiessner responded he would not be removing any trees. August 25, 1992 Page 3 In response to a question from Commissioner Koll, Mr. Wiessner stated he has considered constructing an addition to his garage in the future. He stated at this time, the shed seemed to be the best solution in keeping his yard clean. He stated he would be storing several items such as a riding lawn mower, toys, etc. Commissioner Duggan asked if Mr. Wiessner would be amenable to installing plant material around the proposed shed. Mr. Wiessner responded yes and that he has spoken to his neighbors about his idea of hanging flower boxes on the shed. Commissioner Duggan moved to waive the public hearing. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Koll moved to recommend that the City Council grant the requested variance to the front yard setback conditi.oned upon the applicant submitting exact dimensions to the side lot line and installing� landscaping around the shed. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 CAS]3 NO . 9 2- 2 7: R.AB IN - VARIANCl3 Mr. Dean Rabin, of 1928 Crown Point Drive, was present to discuss his request for a variance to allow the construction of an addition to hia existing garage. Mr. Rabin explained he has three vehicles and several other items he would like to be stored in his garage. He stated he is proposing to extend his garage to the side as he cannot extend his garage to the back because he would then lose a window to his bedroom which is needed for fire safety. In response to a question from Chair Dwyer, Mr. Rabin stated he has received signatures of consent from his neighbors. Mr. Rabin explained the addition will have the same windows and siding as the existing house. R 1 � August 25, 1992 Page 4 Chair Dwyer stated, according to the plans submitted, the finished product will be wider than the existing home. Chair Dwyer stated the garage face will be forty-two feet (42' ) and the house face will be forty feet (40' ). Commissioner Dreelan stated the garage addition seems to be much longer than needed. She stated that with the addition, it will be a four car garage instead of a three car garage. She stated there is only one other home on the cul-de-sac with a three car garage. She stated that aesthetically the addition would look better if he were to cut the garage five feet (5') and then a variance would not be needed. She stated he would still have room for three garages and to store other items. Commissioner Duggan stated that even with a three car garage, the capacity would be enormous and there is still storage space available. Mr. Rabin responded he collects and works on antique cars and has huge tool boxes. Commissioner Duggan questioned if plans to use the garage addition as a repair garage. Mr. Rabin responded no and that the repair work is for his own use. He further stated his neighbors approve of his proposed addition as it will keep all of his items inside his garage. Chair Dwyer stated if Mr. Rabin narrows the proposed garage addition by five feet (5' ) it will still be larger than a typical three car garage. He stated in requesting a variance, an applicant must prove hardship or practical difficulty. Mr. Rabin stated he would like to store his pickup, two_cars and a motorcycle and that the proposed addition will give him the space he needs to store all the vehicles and items he has. Commissioner Koll stated her concern for aesthetics . She further stated Mr. Rabin's home is uniquely aligned and with the continuation of the garage puts a squeeze on the corner. She further stated her concerns for setting of a precedent on side yard setback variances without proving hardship or practical difficulty. Mr. Rabin stated he would not construct a thirteen foot (13') garage addition. Commissioner Duggan inquired if there is height for loft storage or shelving in the garage. Commissioner Krebsbach stated Mr. Rabin's house is prominent in the cul-de-sac and with the addition of the garage, will impact his neighbors. Mr. Rabin stated there are several homes in the--Crown Point Addition with three car garages. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Commissioner encroachment options. August 25, 1992 Page 5 Duggan stated he is uncomfortable with the and that Mr. Rabin should consider other In response to a question from Commissioner Tilsen, Public Works Director Danielson stated there is a standard drainage easement located on the property. Commissioner Tilsen inquired if Nlr. Rabin has discussed the possibility of purchasing a five foot (5') strip of land from his neighbor. Mr. Rabin responded his neighbor's house is placed right up to the setback requirement. Commissioner Tilsen stated a precedent should not be set in granting the requested variance. Commissioner Tilsen inquired if the garage can be built to the rear of existing garage to get more space then the garage would not be wider than the house. Mr. Rabin responded his neighbor has a retaining wall built right up to the property line and if he were to construct towards the back of the garage he would lose a bedroom window. In response to a question from Commissioner Krebsbach, Planner Malloy atated the size of a typical three car garage is thirty-two feet (32'). Commissioner Krebsbach moved to waive the public hearing. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. Commissioner Krebsbach stated the Commission should keep in mind that Mr. Rabin is requesting a ten foot (10' ) more than normal garage and that the addition to the garage would make the garage larger than the existing house. Chair Dwyer moved to recommend that the City Council deny the requested variance in that no demonstration of hardship or practical difficulty was proven. Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion. Mr. Rabin questioned if he could construct and addition right along his property line. Chair Dwyer responded that Mr. Rabin could construct ten feet (10') along his property line and no variance-�would be required. August 25, 1992 Page 6 DISCIISSION ON TOPICS FOR THL SEPT�ER 29, 1992 JOINT PLANNING COb�iISSION/CITY COUNCIL WORItSHOP The Planning Commission discussed several topics to be considered for discussion at the joint Planning Commission/City Council workshop: 1. Stronger enforcement of Wetlands Ordinance 2. Mining, land alteration, cuts and fills, borrow pits. 3. Comprehensive plan review of I-494 frontage from 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. MISCELLANTsOIIS Highway 55 to Dodd Road. Downtown Mendota Heights Tree Preservation Ordinance Mendota•Interchange Project. Air traffic/noise update Pond preservation and use of Expansion of walking trails Beth Jacob Synagogue. chemical fertilizers including Lexington to Preservation of large land tracts Development options for Highway 55 I-35E issues - expansion to three Update on remaining vacant lands. and Highway 110. lanes Chair Dwyer announced that Commissioners Krebsbach and Duggan had recently filed for City Council candidacy. The Planning Commission acknowledged that Planner Malloy has accepted a new job in Aspen, Colorado. The Commission wished Planner Malloy good luck in his new endeavor as a City Planner. VERBAL REVIF.'W Public Works Director Danielson provided a verbal review for the planning items at the previous City Council meeting. ADJOIIRNMENT There being no further business, the Planning Commission adjourned its meeting at 8:15 o'clock P.M. Respectfully submitted, Kimberlee K. Blaeser Senior Secretary CTTY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS MEMO August 27, 1992 TO: Mayor, City Council and City A''s FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Direc SUBJECT: Mendota Woods Job No. 8922 Improvement No. 89, Project No. 7 DISCUSSION: The improvements to serve Mendota Woods have been completed. The work was completed satisfactorily.. RECOMMENDATION• I recommend that Council accept the project and approve the final payment to F.F. Jedlicki, Inc. of Eden Prairie, MN. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with the recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 92- , RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR MENDOTA WOODS (IlVII'ROVIIVIENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. �. � � � City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 92- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR MENDOTA WOODS (IlVII'ROVII�ZENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 'n WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Mendota Heights on May 10, 1991, F.F. Jedlicki, Inc. of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, has satisfactorily completed the construction of utilities to serve Mendota Woods (Improvement No. 89, Project No. � in accordance with such contract. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota. Heights that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved; and � BE IT FiTRTHER RESOLVF.D that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract in the amount of $7,769.74 taking the contractor's receipt in full. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota. Heights this lst da.y of September 1992. CTTY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk MEMO Date: 8-27-92 T0: Mayor, City Cauncil, and City Administratar FROM: Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcetnent Officer �(!� /� .U� C� 6� �� SUBJECT: Building Activity Report for August 1992 CURREHT MONTN YEAR TO OATE 42 BUILDING � PERMITS: No. Vatuation Fee Collected � No. Valuation Fee Collected SPD 1b 2,bfl3,434.Od 22,72'l.37 � 82 i3,4b9,804.00 117,101.26 ' APT 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 I T04�IHdtlSE 4 4 4 � 5 bb9,399.00 6,25'1.42 j CONDO 24 1,691,014.00 10,155.76 � 128 9,003,456.00 54,391.48 � MISC. 30 335,499.00 3,877.38 ( 210 2,494,378.00 24,497.02 � C11 4 57,314.0{} 9,015.85 j 40 S,b82,377.00 3'1,104.73 � -------------------------------------------+---------------------•------•-------a St� Total 74 4,647,761.Q0 37,770 36 YEAR TO DA7E 91 No. Vatuatian Fee Collected 49 7,629,38U.00 b7,590.06 0 0 0 5 Sb3,b4S.00 5,b24.OS 28 1,313,761.00 14,868.17 148 958,644.OQ 17.118.33 38 8,628,930.00 42,447.59 •------------------------------------ 4b5 30,310,4Q6.00 233,34b.49 � 2b8 20,044,3b4,00 ib7,b48.20 TRADE � � PERMITS• � � i � Plunbi�g 34 1,113.00 � 232 31,202.00 � 94 3,8G5.00 Nater 46 230.00 ( 238 7,14Q.00 � 88 440.Q0 Sexer 47 $22.50 + 2'f2 3,710.00 ( b9 9,400.00 Heat, AC, � � & Gas $b 5,709.00 � 325 37,152,50 � 104 9,143.50 -------------------------------------------+--___-------------------------------+-----------------------------___---- Sub ToCal 213 7,$74.50 �1007 73,254.50 � 355 74,8T8.50 Cicensinq: ContractoNs � ( Licenses 10 250.00 � 2�3 6,575.00 � 421 70,525.00 ----------------------------------•-----___+---•-------------------•----__------+------------------------------•----- 7otak 297 4,b4T,7b1.80 45,844.86 �1735 30,310,4flb.00 313,175.4i �iQt+4 20,094,360,00 '173,101.7Q lIOTE: A!t fee amac�ts exctude Sac, ttac, and State Surcharge. Amounts shoun Wiit reflect onty permit, ptan check fee, and valuation amot�nts. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO August 28, 1992 T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ SUBJECT: September 15th City Council Meeting INFORMATION The Prima.ry Election will be held on September 15th, which is also the date of Council's next regular meeting. As you are aware, meetings of public bodies may not be conducted between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. on election days. Please be reminded that the September 15th City Council meeting has been scheduled to begin at 8:00 P.M. � Additionally, in order to attend the International City Management Conference which is schedul.ed for September 15-17 this year, I will not be present at the September 15th Council meeting. As he has so aptly done in the past, Jim Danielson will fill in during my absence. ACTION REQIIIRED None. This memo is intended for Council information only. `�CITY OF i�TDOTA BLIGHTS August 26, 1992 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis r FROM: John P. Maczko Fire Chief SUBJECT: Recommendation for Permanent Appointment Gerald Nelson DISCIISSION- The Executive Board and Review Board of the Fire Department recommends that Gerald Nelson be appointed as a permanent firefighter. Over the year Gerald has completed his Firefighter I training, Level I Hazardous Materials Response and many hours of individual departmental training. Gerald has been very involved and participated in many activities within the department in addition to his fire calls. Gerald is an active member of the Fire Department Safety, Fire Prevention and Capital Replacement Committees . Gerald has shown that he will be a strong asset to the department. � RECOI�Il►�Z�TDATION • I recommend that the Council approve the permanent appointment of Gerald Nelson as firefighter. ACTION RE4IIIRED• If Council concurs with recommendation they should pass a + motion approving the permanent appointment of Gerald Nelson as firefighter to the fire department. JPM: dfw CITY OF MENDOTA HgIGHTS r�bi0 August 26, 1992 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ t FROM: John P. Ma.czko • Fire Chief SUBJECT: Recommendation for Permanent Appointment Ken Weisenburger DISCIISSION• The Executive Board and Review Board of the Fire Department recommends that Kenneth Weisenburger be appointed as a permanent firefighter. Kenneth was a member for 18 months several years ago but due to family commitments had to take a leave of absence. During his previous duty with the department he was very enthusiastic and committed to the department and those traits have continued. Ken has completed his Firefighter I training, Level I Hazardous Materials Response and many hours of individual departmental training. He is a member of the Fire Department Safety Committee. Ken has shown that he will be a strong asset to the department. RECONIl�Z�TDATION: I recommend that the Council approve the permanent appointment of Ren Weisenburger as firefighter. ACTION REQIIIRED• If Council concurs with recommendation they should pass a motion approving the permanent appointment of Ken Weisenburger as firefighter to the fire department. JPM: dfw / CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS '�:,�' • August 26, 1992 T0: Mayor, City Council and City Administ FROM: John P. MaCzko Fire Chief SUBJECT: Recommendation for Permanent Appointment Scott Henning DISCIISSION• The Pxecutive Board and Review Board of the Fire Department recommends that Scott Henning be appointed as a permanent firefighter. Scott has been a very dedicated firefighter and has completed his Firefighter I training, Level I Hazardous Materials Response and many hours of individual departmental training. Scott has been very involved and.participated in many activities withir� the�department in addition to his fire calls. Scott is an active member of the Capital Replacement and Fire Prevention Committees. Scott has shown that he will be a strong asset to the department. RECONII�ENDATION • I recommend that the Council approve the permanent appointment of Scott Henning as firefighter. . ACTION RLQIIIRED- If Council concurs with recommendation they should pass a motion approving the permanent appointment of Scott Henning as firefighter to the fire department. JPM: dfw y A�� `�, 't �e CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Nffi��O August 28, 1992 TO: Mayor, City Council and City A''s FROM: 7ames E. Daniel Public Works ' o SUB7ECT: Upgrade of Friendly Hills Streets DISCUSSION• The Friendly Hills streets have been identified as the second priority in the City's Street Rehabilitation Program behind London/Downing. We propose to prepare the feasibility study and hold the public hearings to consider a pmject in this area this fall and winter. Decorah Lane is a street that will be improved as part of this pmject. Decorah Lane is a collector street that could be included within the City's MSA system and having M5A assistance on this project would help greatly towards funding it. Several years ago Decorah was considered by Council for inclusion withi.n the City's MSA system and rejected, I think because of the requirement for widening it to a minimum of 44 feet. Today's MSA standards have been reduced to allow widths of from 34-40 feet wluch would be less disruptive to the existing neighborhaod. RECONIlV�NDATION• I recommend that Decorah Lane from Dodd Road to Huber Drive be included within the City's MSA system. I also recommend that we begin immediately on the feasibility study to consider rehabilitating the streets. ACTION REQUIRED: At this time, only a consensus of the Council is needed to add Decorah Lane to the MSA system. A formal resolution will then be required after the City receives approval from the Commissioner of Transportation. If Council agrees to begin the feasibility study, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 92-_, RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF FRIENDLY HII.LS STREETS. '�s� . v� - City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORD�RING PREP�TION O� �ASIBILI'I'i� REPORT FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF �RIFFNDLY �LS S�'REE�S (IlVIPRO`'EMENT NO. 92, PROJECT NO. 4) WHEREAS, the City Council deems it necessary and desireable to consider the proposed reconstruction of streets in Friendly Hills. NOW T�REFORE, IT IS H�It�BY 1tFSOLV]ED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the City Engineer be and is hereby authorized and directed to prepare a feasibility study as to whether said proposed improvements are feasible, whether said impmvements should best be made as proposed or in conaection with some other improvement, and as to the estimated cost of said improvement. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this lst day of September, 1992. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA I�IGHTS : Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor -' i LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY GITY COUNCIL September �., 1.992 General Contraetors Licease TCM Con�truction Inc. . Johnson & Peterson Inc. Bob & Sans Raof a.ng of Minn . HVAC Contraetars Licease C.O. Carlson Air Candi�.ioning Co. Palmer Service Electric Co. Dronen Heating & A/C, Inc. .Abel Heating Citywide AjC & Heating Gas Piuing Contraetors License Palmer Service Electric Co. Abel xeating Citywide A/C & Hea�.ing ExcavatiaQ Con�rac�ors Licease T.A. Schmidt & Sons Excavating, Inc. , ,. � ��• . • ,... ' - �.,,..:. , N� �:u •:R. . r•: ;;,4.,: :;�; ,;:; r � ,. " . . i�ii. , , , : . .. . e _ . - r. -w� , ' � , , 1 . • , • • ' Septeruber Z, 1992 TO: Maypr and City Counci2 ' CLAIMS LIST SUMMARY: Tota,Z C3aints • Signif3cant Claims A2brechfi ' � Jedltcki Med Centers MWCC � UnusuaZ Claims Barr Enqr Cnrrigaza Electria Steininqer Const MCNamara ContT Kensington Park Impr Const Xealth Ins Ss�er charges In8 Park Storm Sewer Lift Station rpx Kensington Park Kensirrgton Park I64,99I 8,269 7,�70 10.121 43,52b I,734 2,963 28,975 33,&87 Terno Check Nurnber 1 ' Cttec4t : ` . . ' Nurnber, Vendor. Name� , " . ' � . . .. , < " 1 A'i'&T 5 1 AT&T • � i&i ' . �1 FAT&T°''^,, : z,�:<"�y t�� = � �.;r.' , e . . '1': A`f.&T � � �: . „ ' T&�' '. . ,o� .., " 6 7z `f�tal,� 1'�rnn Check Numb.e.�. � • • �, i�� :. .:; �� : , .. . .�; -• " Temo Check t3umber :; , ' 2 ,s . . , � Advence Soecialties 2 Rdvance Soeaialties 2� van ,�+,.��eneczalties � s � , �;,,; e ,°.., .>�..' L '. ?, T,,,.M v" ,a< ... . . '.:! , ' :'".^:: }.�:< ,.�f . e : R,.�. Y�'` `� ,�.r",.�e �'�:;.:�'°' ,;-.�:�: "�°'> :5:s- :<: ; � . x� :,. � Toi:aj�'('.prnti• Gheek ` umb',j�.'" iemo Gheck Number 3 �k' 3" Alb»echt„wA., •'�=p ' ` . ., r.�.; . yet , , ..a ' €-�,a��:�,::';�;t. ;�:.�.�'`'"��...r^'".. ., ., s . :.':� ; Totals l'emo Check Number a.c'. . `-�'' Y ., a�5,.. � �E+�'^E �i � fiac„ .. ' Z. # `�*�v�K..>. ,� . .....��i'e.,i �.zw',r•.t'',;, �,. `.�9 R ;.;,� 4.a American ^Excel�sior'.Cc�,�` :. ; r,�.,;,,':.��. -�. . . �.�a�� rs� -..�_ _., ..,.... ..�r� Jv"1�V4tLLJ H�aoe 1 -.yJ�iJ_X�---_�_ �.._�_. —�S=E�rg 60=Ut�ZYtYes ---"�' �. Citv c�f Mer,data Neiottts 1 20-Police 70^Parks ! 30-Fire 80-PZanning r 40-CEp 85-Recycing 90-Animal Cantrai Account Code Cammer�ts " Rrnaunt � - 01-4210-0�0-�0 3rd otr �fi.00 �,,_ @1-4�10-@20-2Q� 3rd atr 2�.30 .: ._0.1�210=050.-5�,. __.....__._. Seo�.sxt` ..-.-.��.•.��.-.- E 0f-421@-ib70-70 �eot svc 10• 53 15-4210-060-6m Sent svc 10.53 -01--4�10-07Q�-7� _.. - .- .---�......_ �r_d_otr—.__r.,-.., �-N..52 -- --.---- _ ..: . 93. 50 � s _1___._._._._.�. ...,_ . _. . ._.___�._ _._...__.__�..-.,..._...__-•---.___...__,.__.._._.._._--.•--- - .---. ____..___. - -_ --....__..�..._.__...�_._.._._�_ --_ _ ._.._..._._ ....-----.. . _ ..___.. �_--- __..---.,__.__.�.�_ -----•�---..._..�--- ---- -----__. _-___.._.�..______�.�_ �. 09-4A6�b-000-0� sealer Re 8'3-6F 69T.04 _. fl9-446�b-0�0m-00 solvs 83. @� �. 01_4,34!�¢+Z@-.7_0.____.. _..... =�lv� ------------- -_____..i�i6�5�a_�_� .-- -- 886. 56 - _2��._--____.... _------•----�-- --..�._._^ __. _..�----.•-_� .._._�__- - - --------..-..�_.___.. _________....e_�__ _e__�___...---_._______._.... - 09-4460-@Ib0-Q�b Re 89-6E Kens F�ark 8.169.00 :_ :; ..__..._. _..._._.�_.. _._._ . _ _. ._._�--""'-'--._..__ --_.___ .—_�..6...1%�._Q�al------_.__»..�. __. 3 _ _^ . 16-4460-00@-00 solvs Re ald FS . -.•374.88 � -- ' � _..._._ .--..__.....__.._._..__._.� "-'_ _'_— 374, 88 ,_,'; Tatals Terno Check Nurober 4 -. `fTemo: Check�� Numt�er�'�,-' <,,,�fi<��= 5:�;; ;,v .;n. „ . � �Ki""'�',;�'v<;i'�r,:�,. :..t`p; "A�'i „-M,• ` "�:.,��+a."�, v':�..�:i»`�': �Ci''n,.;r �fie"u`S�?q�i..:h,� 4r.f,�t: °, . .na;�y' �` ." . `.��`�i�IEY�I�i�4a�'Y ?"+<aNi�. �: h YJ��Y�YJ1W� 5 `,�* s�ti. :.-ro,r,j?.S = :.:;;,°."',y',.; � t . :. �:: `aA�.�: u " `� � .,., a ��...,. .;Y .,� , �Temt�;Ctieck�.Number�s�pY�,<....�� e,r..;6"R;�'.. �""�� "�»:�'�x:�'�`�< ;,�n< r�'-�' :s'. ;�� >.;� .:,-.� . 6 Barr Enoineerinn Go c 16-422@-@00-Q�0 ti„�,Totals:�•Teron� C}i"eck 'Namber,.; ' � 6 .;.�.. 1� p: ;,. _r- a :: -*-; � �,:-a.;�x: F �� ,.� � r; � � +�a.;„0.,'��,r,��+��t:s�'w-'��"�y:;��:, ;a,�i' � �'.xJ;:. � • ,;' > s,.w^.c�.Y' ;'.�u::° �" r��ws ��xs, ,..��Temo`'Check 'Nuraber fi '�p` ��a'•.�'..7._..^� _..�. 7 Baatmens Bancshar�s Ir�a 01-2071 .. i ��:oa`4..�':,.sk�';#��w��:� � s.,...... 'r•.a;;..,u:�x.�,. . �' .—.—�._ .--_ .. -�r— : y-- .a. . .. �� ° ;� : x ;.. •;. - '-.�' .x>�:�.yfi e 4 . r x:� ;:,� f - , £ .. �.:. ;., . , 'F � t . , `w.`� "� : „ ,,� . . X „��: ,. �i,'ei,:` .. � � •STy�� ^ �. '{3va' �" • V ' . � __�.._ .. . � . . � 1¢�3 G�C. 12. 65 .x � , .�f' p. , x .. . _ Re ind nark Wtr Morot 1.733.9@ f„�33• 9Qi . , .. y` �s;` �; . <:�:, , y � � '� . .. " . < 8 . _ , `�d�^^.. . V x � .X .'A 2.` � �t. 5eot orern � 151.95 C3{ry.. f�w Ss5 ' :5's :�� -- -..� ____ Fri 9: k6 RM .—...'� __...____.._.__- - - - -- -Citv -�� r Terno Check Nurnber '7 � a ■ mo. -�---•--- - ___-.___. .----- _ ...._------_. . �- -- , : ' � Gheck ..�.. . � � ; , . .� ,K : z �_� Nuinber Veridcr Name � Accuur�t Code Garnraer,ts " Amau�t 3(•. 3 . .. y;=��;>' � • . . .:� . � . __..._.._..�_.__.....__...�.�_...._.._..."_»'__" .'_.._..__.__�.�.__' �___"�..� ....__ ».__ u..�._....._ -�....�.. � ` L+ 7&oatraens B�r�eshares Ir�c Q��-4ls�-��0-�0 5eot orero 81.08 �,,,,- ' 7 Hoa�rnens Bancshares Ir�c ?1i-413�-050-50 Seot orecn 48.$@ i!" � #.rne�ic-�a�acch3r-ec--I.r�c--_._._._�j1.-k132-070-7.4�--_...---.__...._ —reo�-ar-ern -- �---------.-�5.�`a0--.. . �ep ' -, -`�?1 Baatmens"Raneshares Irtc f5-41a�-@60--60 Setat orem �5.57 �i c� a . . _ .. , ------ ;, �. 4 ' .. . .. _ --333.�Q�@— �''� �� _.^_._..--••-•• - - -- •--.____... ......._. _._. _ . ..__..�...___.__ �.—.—_. _�. -_.....�..��... ,o� Tatals Terr�a Check Number 7 `,� i` 8 H S N Corn 8 Tatals Terno Check Number ' „Temo Check"Number�� 9 I t � �r • 1-Z�Rali"'t k .._.... z • a � ° 2-s-7.atna--Cbeck-lUumber > ti .;, > >4y � ,:� . . �.'iema` Gtseck°tNumber iQ� r ^ � 10 Etuff & Shine � � 3 �~ ' ��.�To�als,:Terao':Check Number, : . �;•�,} ' �% M:., - �,s: `,y.:�'< `�':` �xa":N::p, 3 - y :. � � �rno=GFae�=iViimber ----�•1— ' il Bal�nd Lawn Svc s ' w1S >k> ., ., 9 .:,e_� ,.: , "' }g..�.. �'Tatals •Tema Check'1Vumber 3 � .. : s, • °� Ternc� Check Number 1� , � � �e 3 . ' F •x.: �. :.. • . a . � i'pr . �, 5r`F �", , � `� �,M g t `. - 5 , ' �t . ., . . � �,-�-T�ino-Ci�aia-kr.Number � . 6I' Terno Gheck Nurnber 13 s� 9� x� 13 Cant iriental;Safetv Eca <s,^ p � e;.i °•%• w;,$� i i.�.. .. _� � �� > � ; � ` ' .� .y��_..r ' 7atals Tema `Ct�eck tJumber� _, � 01-430,�i-07@-7� solvs 48. 40 •� � :ti __ __ ._. ___.. _ .._ .. _. ._- - - .... .-•- •--_.-_.-- --__ _.�__._.__..------_-- ---_.._.___._— -.-_ _ .��.�__—__—___�_�..�, 48. 4@ �.::- 8 �2,: � --' .�.._ __.._.. ._..,_- - ---. _ _ ... _ ._. ..--�------ ---- — ;r ( isc ,_. =.'s �'rF.t •-----39.96-_��.�.._. �=_� -Qa1-43�1t,.ci-Qi30-30. _ ._...._..__._.--------sa�..u5 _..__.__....__.___,__.e._... , ..._ _. _. ._ _ __.. . .. - - - 01-4430-@20-20 1� ._._�..__.�_..�. ,... Qa1-4335-315-3@ 11 --- -.__—_ .�.. car washes 3tt1 svc , ,3' " . ., ..._ .. , .'..� . 15-4305-@6m-50 , � ",so2vs,.� „ t . z .x. . A .. . " . ^ ` 3` v �a .�"'..> :�' , 13 ,,, . ;w;Y::a: �t:�„.r�;�.;:x ,,.,.�<-;�:.�'r, . ,.� - � , .., �z ;:,, r ' � z:'� 'i.x!' �"��e°. '' ` ��~ '� ' � � d'w ?'ey� x*.5°r`�'�`4 �-N.+; �4�:,.a��`:.' 2:•-• ,�� ei''=4z�o.-'s'i�-a�.; � .: :':e�-,,�:: ,.�:_ ,�uis..,. 4 T�.�; � `� - svc ."''fr. �':> 5sp�a':,:'xr,ne.�'d-�k""",.:z df�� p� .' v�£:a� . m.,:";'�� i"�°a,n.x >�>>.;a�:�"'.... u"'��>'•,�.s.m '��.";. '�3��s"..�n l,s. '.--.—,._.—..—�....—.._. _ .�_ _�-�.� �._..�_..-�_.^ ----^ ' ��a: 39. 96 I= � ---•---._�. �� .-----k'=� :.� �.i � s�,� •---- - ---------� 18. @IT .___. ~ � �v� � . �� 3 JJ '•" , a_ arn_ __—__ I�C� 23fL+. @0 ' a � 230. @0 ` ' . --- � . " #• �5.. x. �� . , .. , '490.�Qt0' � ' .- : � � e9 14 . -,. , r� , .. `' . h5 . .� , ._ . ",�.�s1`� , ,y>.�`>i�e,: •."a_ ..,�' " asJ o>'�^'}y.5,1"l �f.7p°•1 i3� . � i�'.F jay'X, .&��f`rq'� �j'�.nr..�.z;.}Ye.,,',�, .titt..�r,�;.�� .,s,x;1-, o��`�a.'� 'q�. �,��... 1.�JC�AI�Ia � �, �� .��.._�..,�_.�.. ��..� _..... .' __ _ L.. J V. �__..,��..�..��.��'� .�_ _....___... �.��.�.�.��...._�.�_ ��...� F' C70 Fri 9:46 AM Citv af Mendata Naiohts . Temo Check Nurnber �! �..' o____...____..._ �. ....... ._.. . .._._......__.._�_,�_�____.__.__..__.._.._.____,�_._..�-_.. � , V:;., Ctie�k -. �'.<A ., , y; .. ,.>,•x. '�: Number.:Uendor Name Accau»t Code Cornsne»ts ' Rrnau»t g� . t „— -�._..._......._»._ _• _ _. . . ' " ' _' " .._. ......___._..y.�...___.�_. .. _.f _.__�......._._. _...._._'.�_...._'.«..� _._ " Tatals Terno Check Nurnber il 5 6 [1 �i1Caf^�t �et�EtT" f� . .. ...y '"�_�`�'�...�_�....��._' �'��_"». _.�. .._......� . . _�_�.,.�...«__�'.._'_` ��'�'..,��.�«��...�... _�.�.� _.�.«��... ��......�.�.. �. 7 `�� y,xa�;�.rY�,V: ;v.,. `�r,r,. $»: '�4, � . 8' � 22"Fiel'stone 'Cabineirv Inc ¢�1-4131-02¢�-�0 Seot ins Re �ariack 78.0�b y— 'h ,-..� a. ,� �_---...__ __._ ...,.. , _ .._ .. _. _. _ ..._...,..__._.�. ---�___..._.__�_._.�_.—..�__..._��.a�-�. 'o �� 78.2�0 " Totals Temo Check IVurnber 22 ,z --�— ---------.�..._ ... ....�_ __._._---�---------.... -- ---�-•----_-.-------......__....._._.____.__..... " Temo•Check Nurnber 23 �o • . ' • : ,s • � i.r.-�watch -----.-_._ -0k-4330-440-�@ ._-.._..oar-t�---------.. .. 1G ��,, " _ 17 .�- �' 18 �.a3.s-xeruo-Check-Nu�nber _.___�.__ .�..�3 __ .. . ... ...... ._.__ ___.____--------•-------- .. 19 . .£^. '�.e. 20 :�=i'errio" Check•..Nuinber�� 4 . , z, '�;,; : . a_ . �,,:.,., �: �<.... .-. .: . „ , ..<.. • z .`Y.": C . , . . . . �".r"_"" ___'.. __ .. _...._ . .. ' " . ._ .... _...____._ �___.-_� _ .__..._. � �� 4 Ferico Inc 01-433Q�-49@-70 rors za za . . ., , - , �.,... -----.—__._ _.--- — -- . ._ ..... .. _ __...- --..._._�»..._..w._..__�._.__.�.------'--. _. IZS •,�,��`�'T'otal`s�.Terno Clieck Nurnber 24 ze +;,�,;,�': ,� ;<�; 27 ""iay�o�-Cbocic-t+turaber —.-25.--.—.__„_.---.._ _. .._ _ ._._ __..___.__.._...__..________.___.._.___..-----_.___ ..._.____ _..._ ze 4�9 �5 Fortis Benefits Ins Cu 02-433G-@31-3�3 Seot oresa 146.�0 3 34 ,1,�,;.�iS . .:'��t'`'.�,�yS `�y�y � .�...�.__._.... _.._.�...._�...�.,_._.._.__ .. ,.�_._.__.._ _...—w__.._�__ 1�#f}. �� ^ �3z ° v��Total`s � Terna�� Check Nurnber `5 33 '.g.y< .;�i�'aM,.< �.�_.__._..___._"".�_.....�.._....._,.._. .- _ . .. ...._ .__._..«.."'...._�____�_._...._.......�......_.._"'...'_...."'_,.' "'._�.._._��__ _�._ aa Temo Check Wumber �6 �5 3b 37 ,,;ay , rav.:J,`ii;.A,.;....Xs?h':'.,�....: ..'b: 4 .r $,t..X. .;�;_ "�,:g; t,,r, ;.,.a<<e: -:��.v..c;:� •�`,..�:,��_,; . .. +s,. x•:z�aaux' �. ,.y�.;.' ,�,. re_�,�..�r::�"«;, . 38 ,� :� ,'��,ZEY�y.i�°+.s°a�'i".Y�':sy.I� a.,R: d. 39 `�!.� ' �R�� 13iQ�32Y" d0 � " Tema Gheck Nurnber 27 47 ,3 ;a� ��^ 2'7 � Grouio' kieaTth 'Inc k � aa ,? t = �5;�•::'r;�M fi� �;c; iz`;<¢%`".,`i. " ` , a5 Y'�.::x' `:��`:.x< .�,=.�a, , °� Totals Ternn Check Nurnber a7 as tiFD-�t38C�It�--:litttA56Y` � �.8 49 �n�.t..�.i,:i 'r�;y%..;`R.,.x:,: A. ' ��`�,r; y`yqn3,xi'';,�.5t�s�Cy � r"�� • . 6g :{..�.� ; ;s,X ;�'"� ;�s . .. .,t .. R;;. ^� , . ;.� �8�•3 C:.MI� q��%�R`:�7.� I51 ,..."&:a•` _......°�'� .....: ....::'r.... :� �:`yt=^ . . .. r �+ 9i :� 56 . „:�;,�.,•�;�-. ;:`�:;�� •. �;" '*`'�� ;:'�4� . Seot Re Ku�l�nder ,p z „ • 6/21 oavroll . " '�� t4i �'...-..,.....t t � � ��:: �,�. :. �°:.;�e�-w.��;�� ,��*, �°' +�4�� '.��'v«'r.;,. , 'o� :H, '::�i `t � ''":i4er...v�: . . —=---- f � so r� ��i. 3Fi " . < 51 ' 5T 53 5c.'} 6�� •' 56 ._ " 9.�, � �� f .�� `��:a ,. : 58 � ` �....�_ ' <4 h' � ' � ��59 �'�5..041 B1 fi2� C3 ' 64 " ` . =� . ., se� �} 478. 63 �` .� e� ^ ` -. ':4 .�q� 68 69 . 70 ,i 573. 61 » -� t, } � � Temo Check iVumber 29 < CFteCk-�:i':��: x';' c2, ,. `..' ,, < ,�:a �; � . Nureber ,Vendor Natne � , . �< x> :�: .:'�;x, 29 P F Jed2icki i�,c �� .. �n Tata2s;�`Teinc►--Ctieck �Numtser �.` ,,.}..;' ;�,�a•�" ';€; ,. , . , . , ��"'' . � ,. 30 Knutsan Rubbish 8ervice d ;. ti;' -�3td� '�., „.;. ..,:',i�.... .,,: . .. ` �'Totals ,7emo Check Number �� .�,�. � - Temo Check Nurnber ' 31 �� ,�,; .. � �;h.µ.. .. y,r:, ., . 31 7homas Knuth 32 Thoraas Knuth 3�7hor�as Kn i�h `,' <i^;=a:.f.�.��ati��x�.�:y;%:"kffi�•�s�":��'� .y . :Sv: v;�Gil�'.�.y'i..:: :"'R:�$`S�^i�+ . . : �4-. x '� �'�Tataj� Temn�Check<Ni Temo Check Nurnber ;°ac �.c�,c_ a,;,=��r `�w ''^,'';��s=:` 'x� � : x�:..:° „ ;;�:.,� _�-: .:` r � : .. °,<.,< - > �� ',�:�<� .. �:.: .^�[' ';� � 3� z r� ::?�;�c. . PTotals Temn ChecFc tVucnber 66 JL �` ,;;� ��'- - i ., a� .:. µ;�FZpV ��,�g��e.,<: �af; .�F�ie�'~�"Y. ;?S.,'«��T�` k��;'."�, .' :..`..... ^,.kTemo Cheak` IVi{rnFiet^��'��-'� .`",^ �'34"� _. !'�"'s§ ^>r w" : '�';�ax;' �xr,Y. „}S-�q,: 34 Leaaue of Mri Cities 34 Leanue of Mn Cities '.: � ,:�;a* 5& :� ,--�„;; • ,. .,;..,,,�:;�:�;:�.s �a w:'s.,,�.:r;. ' .er&, w,'m,> �.... :" x=` t;. ` y�'�"">N�m� 'e'M,"° . � . Total,s�;Temn dCheck� IVuinber,�;<. •y'+,�'. ..,i;rt.'i'q'q "3:'A'r :.�'xf:.A,;,s`¢:.s.'+�� `* �7emo Check RNumber = 35 � ��.�„> ti,�� aoe � --• -•---- - Citv uf Meridata Heiahts -'�—'-------__.._____--- _--- - _,.,_--�, i _ _ r ---•--.___._. _._--• --_ _ .. _. __,__...__.._____ ._..._. __........_ ..��-----------,..__.—__�._...._.�.__ ._ �- . �- ` Accaunt Ccde Carnrnents � � AtRCiltYc'� �� _..,�..�.� .._ .... _ ..... __ � .. _ _. .._._�..__......___..__....__...'� .__"._._....._.. __"_'... __... _..,.__...._' .�_.M_'._«.._._........_..__.__-_�._._... � 4 ss-4460-841--04J ovrnt ? 89 -7 7`769_74 � F!� _��_.____....__.,.-•---.----.-----M.__�.._.._� _______.__....._..___.___._.._____..____�.�_7..759,7..�----•---- -E- 29 �� @8-k335-000-00 Aua svc 60.06 . -•------_.._. . _... ._...___.. _ ....__.__...._.. _... _._._. __.__ _�___... .._ _. , _ . __.. --�-- ._.... ._.__ 60. Q�fs .__ .-- ---�----_ - 30 •' = �:- .�S.-tt�*-5,�.7-!DQi(D��@__..._. ----_.._._._ ��1,.Y'...E,l7AI�_.,._ .___.—'_�._._.___. T_.�v.��.--'---- — 33-4415-8A1-0Q� mi reirnb 7. Q+0 '4 4i-4415-846-00 rni reimb 21.56 - �3-�415-$7.2-0.Q1.__ _.--_•�-------�. *ai�^�irsb. ..—._�.._..___. ..__.__...� 48..7.2-----_-.._ __�._ �=_ 76-441�-833-00 mi reirnb 2�.96 • ;;G. • 81-4435-830-tD0 rni reimb 20.72 j:=; _4@5,�l415-105-1��_.._. __.-_.� rni rei�t3b __ __- _��10.SZt0.__.�-.--•--.- --. -- 166.5e �t' �1____...._ ._ _ __ ___.. ___.._._ _ _ ._�__.e,---__ _.___.---._.�-•------.--...-.. _.-.__.---...______. �a� I�s � ��...�._.. �_..« �..��... � � 01-2075 � Seot dues 275.@0 -� .,-,� ...s I`,�� Ji 08-4415-00@-00 2+1-2Qi7k 01-4131-0�0--20 34 ' id2-�074 ;y:e':^ <:sK4,`i� • �.. � � -�.,. �' ,r`: �..¢'x -, = . ,.,�4 �'`�' '` .,: "`�r 5'"",: "} �. `�';:. �° �.: �.,��, •'^�+,�"�;�Y`.,# �?�a��:.,',;.��,�kt<t � 5 J�t i�"F� :Y'' :`Y.�..''�Ts'.��.>' ."n.np..�. `'T ',,f'<�' : 'i� i 2'� ... . A R�".��.' . . '..'$:� , . . . • � . � �#= � ' .. � , +exo �reimb ` , g. „� , � Sent orern Seot orern rc . '.y _v . '..:'�:.z � ... � .. Y ,. � - !'�17�. �ryG ' :'��A'�' ,c � „ �SO�y �2t.16 �� = 19Qt.98 �ss` ' 54� - . < . �6Si. . . .. � ,�:r' ' . . I6p� . 593. 01 e: 813. 2fi lez i6< . 1.4@5.28 � • i6E .. �� \ ;.;1.'S,'�. .' : r,�+ '° . , :x <.. " , .,. . 67� . ..ar�Yx�sbhy�..�" , ..a,' .�cG� � �68� . 7Q�: ' i Fri 9:46 phi ^ Temo Check i�iurnber � ' �Ctteck�.: .�;:�;�;;;�;%�g...�.,��. ' ,�" Nutnber' Vendcr.,t�lame � ' � , , .�,.C.,,�� , s °�. ; ` 35LifeUSA 5 35l.ifeUSA s U._S..A 8 140 - .{ " , g `� �-�emo--CkrecSc-N ,o " Temo Check Nurnber 36 iz " ��.36 Lake Countrv Chaa Icba -14 _.� ., .f. 7S� . � � ._.._.._..._.. 's Tatals 7erno Check Nurnber 77 1e � hf{arahar _�7 ts .�r :.yw.. :�.;�y.,..,��; ��; � � ' �o >, ,�i:"'�.s '�'�" ,e'�:?. .� . _ � °�37� hl YThornas";Lawell 31 �.�i _�.aP.::r,a..,g,;'s:-�^" zx " 37 . . . . , Z' Tatals Temo Check Number Z4 �25 Temo"Check Number• ,'; ,_ 38 �e r,.. �,.�, �: ��.a ;Fti;,.;�:, , �; z' > � '#�� `t�-=3"ieiae�it � 28 � 38 L.incoln &enefit • i3q 38 �incoltt Benefit s� '�.Iikfc �"�.:�;:��.' .�;, "'�� `;��=r �,.�:.� �:=•W, �32 '`'��,Tata2s`�7eino=�GtieckxNurnber 7a �.'Se � ai:� 5.�,�" '..� � ; 7"'i, w, q;.'�� 34 Temo Check RUurnber 39 35 36 s� : a ; w r*»,•�'?��. ��.,�. ,�,.�:::��^ ��,,;;.,p,>, , '';,a. ,x. ;; � » . 4` �;,,.'` 'y �r:T �;�:'� ` . 38 � �i ' .S* �.p,�.eax•-a. ,; cx'r'�'•�.ry �F.�. �� J =j< ,;.�;fi.r� 39` a�?'�<�e:�� '�;<,�•z •.> •'�; ,_ „ . . a9 ;"S.eino=Check�.Nurnbe� ao "' Temo Check Nurnb�r 40 as 43 �;:x'.'si1a��{�E'�,;�rQY1#'.Q3^5" f'�•.{�-,�� 4° '4fd-.bfed�r�Centers ti�-Pa.� a5 . vd a6 40 l+Sed Centers H P " 40 Med Centers H F <a r�q�ed�ent�rs H L "9 ;,�;40`Med Centers�.,H' P_��, sa +`� ,40�"IMed��Centers�H, P�` .` , . 15, y';�� . ;. , �- �_,• ��..,��=.�_ � �:�;, �. _ - � hJSi11 - Citv affF�keridata Heiohts 3� Rccaunt Cade Cumments �i-4232-Q�50-5Q� Seot orern 05-4131-1@5-15 Seot arera 15-k 131.=060�60 -_._.,_ ._ _. _.�. ._.__._._._..,�..._-.Seot.-or-ern .._.._. ._,_._.__....._ ._ �_..._...----... ..__......_..,._------.�._._.._� 0 f -440Q+-150-30 rea�^ _._. 36__... ._. _.___ . ..._.�.._ _, -------.�_..,.� �x-4tiis-iia-im � 37 -.01--207.A..�___.._ .�_ Q11-4131-0G0-G0 ?3f-k131-1 iQt-f@ 3$ _09=4�b0=000�0a , �-2{1-�074 ,.. 01-4131-110--10 � 1=..41.31�2�-2�.- Qs1-4231-Q�40-40 01-4131-050-50 � t -�131.-07tD�7�D.._. , Qt5-4131-1@5-15 @8-4110-000-00.' Seot alluw ��..,�_ -_._� _�__ ..��' (� T ' Amoant 3'. �4; _- 77. 68 �.-.._--------_._�__�._�� :� 2Qi2. 95 (, �. -....329.-::7_ _. � ,_. ---- -----_..-_.,_._.__,._._.__: � : ------ i r � s^ 656. 23 "- � " _,.._....______ .,�� _.__�_..�_.._.. ____ �,a s r. - i; ----. ,_. _ __._----- -_. ._..�._. _ .__ ... ...._ _.. 163. �Qt .. ��w� �. -----_._.__.�_ib3..00-_.. __.. . _.. . -------------••--�---_`- 1� �_� 175. 00 � ____..-_ -_-----.__..�.�.. .-.,�___-- :�`. 175. 0m , jac� . �. , _-�- �:'?s .__._._-.Seot�ar-em--..�_�____......_.__.�._�.^._$@._�0_��.� ="-� Set�t prern 1. 109.5m � �Y,',' Seot urera 93. �ct0 i°�> � i '401 ...v�. ..__..__...�...__... ��. �..� , <S w. � x�o ?0± �;t=�"�R� ' • Seot _ arera , ,. �•Seot'nrem , � . �" GA�+ nrarp,. Seot arern Seot orern .�,ant nr�n . , .` . Seot orern ' . - � , .. �• Seat .�orern � >. s. ,. , .,... c_..�. .........,.., c. , . . ,�$a --- 360 sa 56 ` �� E �o;+,� � � . ,: a.. . . ; � . >�. - - . h _ rw• , � ,t. •,,�a.,... -. � 4' w�; ,_p,�"'+x?n. ';�b�:�''x�s,:.>.�":b;-?i;,�`;��:,'.M.A�r��y.,".> ,�: .3s:•z;,' a. �t#:'f;'.: e � �,, n.` ;�,::„§`s �;P:€��2R Y,'�`,pe', ,v�.. ..�°"Ya 3°'. `¢,w "�k�.�0.t r��:si'�k � ��._��, :�,::;.. �x.Y. <a. ��5 .:�.' �x....�:�.•.. x .�#.<; .X •., r �p''.��- .x;,: , 56 .:".'.�'.n , :a- <�d:'.�`�i.„ r =:n,;;�t�'Y :.."�.i!"., ,p�:��. .;.Y"at^.,:'�,. 1.?�*'` !.'$.> .r` r,..`:a�Y`.x.a:..y^£<`.�'�.".g..>:�s;, .� ) >.a n,.'f, »r,�� .a�,i...e Npk•kZ'x. �'Y ..:, f�.�.�re£a�..r �� S ✓� ,p�.�, ✓y' S d�.i fw�;; *� if° du°�' $ es�R • C..4': ' Yi.�'^; . `��y` ;4,��.�#,S£. 7:°i�.a�e`$.e: u�'b'.P:\s)'< .•A�u��j'i'µ, �v�:A 7'��'r:'. �`Yw'�`�� °)'�^2� Ld3�.a.�.raAy.inai'...� .•s6¢L�'d.<n:'� j�?.i;. V S�Q.:..Y "J`,q;�� S ep. f"� � . ..��..n... . , •--.n-� i�-.-...-....-.�«-��-. �...��. ;,.�r-.^. �..��r.�-� ..��.. �. f . k � `33. 886. 50. .2. 536� 35 < " 1, 253. 90 ` � - �..096:90=...� 550. 0tII 1. �09. 25 3$�i_ 2='� a 696. 30 ' ' 146. 30 ,¢, .- ..__ J27_AS � 1¢i. 121. G0 r•nuc r Fri 9:46 RM �� Citv csf.Mer:dota Heinhts Terno Check Number 4i rna - --- � , Gheck n.. ..'�. ,z.: . . . 2 .. ;��. e .� •�Nurnber Vendor Name Accaun� Cede Carnrner�ts '� ` Rmaur�t 5 ..`r ' .��.�..�.�,. •-- " 42 Mett^o Waste Cc�r,tra3...—�.-.._^.. 2�-4449-050-6� �...--.....__.._._ Seot svc 46. 3��.08 �5 41 Metro Waste CGntrc�l 17-3575 Seat svc 2,796,08cr � - ._._..�..--------------- -- -- - -� ' 82 � ` �` , < . , . ., F 43, 526. Q+0 e � Tatals`'TernoA Check Number 41 - � �, :�,�•. • -; � - ..____..,.__...._.... --- -•- ---- -•---- 70 Ternv Check IVumber � 42 S1 1z, '� Mi21er Prir,tir�� ,_._...^ @.1=43Q!5-Q140-4Q�_...... _ _.._.._.___,�_._.—.�.__ne�tni�._f.ar.rns.._._�..�__.__.._�..--._.�54._�P�TI__ cr " 42 Miller Printirio @1-4305-040-40 C�35CdUri� 5.08cr 74 4� -Mi ller �Priniirin Q�1-k305-040-4Q� inso rots 9'9• 00 ,c �; � �„r Dr�ir�tyyiB --------'--,---_Qli-�t3P1�3-�D�#Qi"jt$ , -. .. _-_.__.,..__�__.___.�CI15CC:ttY1't�.._-- _--•.--.- �,98cr.. 1G__.� ____.,._ �� i�,g 345.54 ,a .4G.._---•-----.�..,.---.__w_..__.p , . 19 , .d,t Jr�::;:suc-��...r;�.,. .. zo ;�Temn��Ciiecks: Nu'mtsej^�` � � 43 ` . s, .,. " a . � ' , --- ------- 22 43 Minn Cellular Tele Ca 01-4200-610-20T Aun svc Za 43 Minn Ce1lular Te3e Go @2-4200-520-22� Aug svc 24 43 Minn Cellul r Tele Co _ Q�1,=�¢�Q�=6��0_ry,__� Aud__sys. 25 „ ,,, 43„Mi»ri::��el'l�uiar Tele Co 01-4�Q�0-610-3@ Aua svc ss :43'..htinin°�Cell:ular 'Eele Co 01-4�20-i#C�-1¢+ Run svc 27 ��s'�it r ��;*t't „4;.x,�x. ' ...__..�_'._..___.._�__._�._�"_"""_.�__ ._._�_... _ 28 ^sL 1.�3 'g Ta�als Tesnn Check Num�er 43 30 3e Temo � Checfc' �lVuraber,:. 44 ^ .` aa y,r u., . oi: _ • '�,. z:: �a ','4l+�'MinYj�1.41�U31� � YfP Tri�_.. _�@1=$@7.G_.��. a" 44 h}i»n Mutual Life Ir�s 03-�07# 75 44 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-4131-110-iQ 3G 4k M'snn Mutuai Life Ins ¢�1-4131-0�0-2Q a� '_,',?;'� „44" Min"ri';Mutua2 .Li_fe"_Ins;;;�;.''N;'� ' ..01-k13i-Qi70-7tt .,,��;y;�;, .., , �; ,� . a. ,� z� . `�$ `" ��!+!+�IMinn.Mutual',Lifer;Ins � :'@8-4110-00@-QQ 39 � � �� s�,.x-s.ii ��4.�''.x,': F �.3��:. ,{ ,. . , � a0 �Ej!} 41 Totais Temo Check Number 44 <a 43 �.Tentn; Check°i Nutnber�,:�:' '.��` a,�„� " 45 <• « :r��t.,r',q ; �r.� ., ts.,;.a .1�^H�".% �..;� � o),•��•5 i��. s.:. �Gi .4✓,p, t?.5;� �£.i . as �" ' �_.��_ 46 45 Minnesota benefit Rssn 01-4131-110-14 47 45 Minr�esata F�enefit Assn 05-4131-1�5-1: '8 45 Mi nesat H nefi Rss _.,--- 0i-4f3.k_Q}��_:,?� 49 '.`45;hli�nneacita�:itenef,it',,Assn, �. 01-4131-@50-5Q - `• , � .>�; so 4`�n .A�...�;:45� Mirrriesota'Benefitn.Assrr ° 01-4131-07�b-7G a� 'zx � �;. �;�<. , a: �°.-`e'' * ;� :;�' ',t �; ;.�� .. . 52 'LY7�� . sa Tatals Tema Check Number 45 ..K�.'��:..�'x'3�"`3`. ;"F..�`�.".'";�':$i..�w"i °��;..�...�...�s�: ,,.__,___ A/^cl nav,�a, $eD� Di^E'tn Sept sarern Seot nrem .. . �^3:Seat:�orem �. - •...;'' Sent' nrem � . �`:,f•�Fv,�r. [� . :��;��}: . , '. A �� . �r�� .. Seot orem Seot arern S'oD� �r2;lt SeQt ..prern - ''aep�Ex`orem� . ,. a r. . .. . kk. . � lfb. ErPJ 10. 6Qt 1�..53. 12. 10 1 Qt. 53 54.56 189. 92 1. ?0 ^+ 40 - � „;..• • ^� ,'.k'-�` '�. ti� �;'``� , ,+^,�h,�, w. �gs. l..,,a r:'Y�,,, ',.:S:t�:i +�`. &'s�&.ti<:;':E,+�'.. '' ' t. :2y�. � . . . <�' ., < . . "�" 1. 7td .. . - ' , "� 7��J. �'i' � - .t, y�� F a�~^� � � . '�� .__. s. i ��u.,9$.. . �' , 151.86 369. 48 r�i�i.�f ', ` - . 26�.42.; � � . � " '' �' 372. 68 . ' ' ' � ' , , . �, ._; �� i. 887. ��1 Fri 9:45 AM —' -�—.�--•-"--.-_.__. ..___ __.._ �itv af Tetaa Check Nurnber 46 � s p_.._....__.__�_.._....-___..__...�..�_._...__. _.__.__w_..._� ' . Check'. , � NumbertVendor Name Accaunt Code Comrnents 3 ", �.: ° 46 Minn State Retiremer�t 8vstern. .. Q�3-v07� � i�_.�_.�~- --.-�--� 8IG3 oavroll 5 �� 6 � —_,_----• ----- - — -_.. __.. -- . � . _...�._ __ _. -- - ---- ___._— ' �..Tatals Temo Check Number 46 ' ' $ ..t � .i.. fi F . � , 9 . raa-Cbeck-1t3uraber �+7--.._-----•--�....__..._..�. --,--.. ._ ._. -----•--. ....._-..—�_ � 10 �" 47 Natl F C & Emncv Infa Ec�treau 0S-k305-0�30-3� directc,rv 40.@4� ,z � '----�-"-_"'..._.....__., ..._... _. .._. .___ ._...___.._�,�----"—^"_--__�_.__. r...__.�..�_�..__.__..._ .�_�—_....'"---^- ,a 47 40. Q+0 " - Tatals Ternn Check iVumber 47 15 � . _ �. ___.._ __��__._.._,. ' 4?) Temo Check Nurnber 48 ~ Y ( 1e �tt Fira ar�+:.ect.i.or.��__. ____ __ _01-43@5-03@-30 -- -.--� .._______ =olxs — ..— 79 �� r,.:. • . :4 4$ �' , Q ,.. s, '�T,�ma-=Ck�ecli-Number--___..---._ 48-- _.._._. Zs. -- _ .... -•- --- .r_.._ _ ____..____--, 2' ierno Check I�turrtber 49 zaT�___....__....._�_... _._—•------- - ...__ _...... . ..._...-•-----.�....._ �..��.-----'^-- �z5 • z6 ,• .z;4'9 q0akcrest Kennels 01-4221-8Q�0-90 Aun svc �° .'49 Oalicrest� Kennels 01-42�5-80tA-90 Auq svc z� �^�'"'� " "a� ,.,_ �_._�____._ ._.__._ .._ . ..__ _ .--- - ---....._____.__.__T� .�—_..._.__ za �$ i�g Tatals `Cerno Check Numher 49 30 s' �Temo ;Clieck Nu�nber „ 5� -_.—_---____� ___.._.__.---.._�__._._.__.___-- ----- . ,3� ., r :. �y,`Z,� . � ..�- :.c• . „ .,., s: � r . aa ., .-- ex+{Serv.ice Ca • 08-433u-000-00 --. ..-- - -act--ttar-u-8/..15— 74 - ..._...�_. _.. _.�......_a.._�._ — � �.� 35 �� ig. Q�� 3G n i"hpl^it IVttMtlPi . J.�... — a) ' `4�`.#� f$�'; ,��'.A�y,. ' ., , >. . . . .. � .. .. . ^ ..,''=�, „ 38 Temo f,Check � Nurnber 51 ' • _ � � ' ' • 39 < <x ^r, _ " - ` °0 51 Rato Rooter^ 01-43sS-310--5� M� rars 7k-�+� " 51 Rota Rooter 01-4335-310-70 rors 74•00 °� e+^ —.�..15�335-.s10-6Q►.._____ ____�� --- . 48 . Y.tay��.�rc `f." �,V'•'_➢, , ��p`e >. .. . `•.r � ... < < .. ' p � ��:t��.� , T . ' ,.v. . `��r ,i53` ",�-�'°:;�;': :� ' : .. �.a .. �• . - 222.00 <e' `�n=Ct�ec3c-Namber ----51 �_-- - --_-------. , , a6 ") Terno Check Number 5� <s, °9 < �, .52'Ruff' Cut .>:>;� , - sa _ •�� :3; ��'': ',,,:,,� � �rg=. . si r. "'�G�Ar1`. �2 To�als Temo Check IVuaober '' Arnaunt 35. Qi0 -s� r.n. 183. 90 �9Q�. 00 220. 0td 410.00 5; � 6 �: � {- E 9 , �,a� [� �, •i?� f .4'r �fLi e- --^-----_""'—i :'� ., � ;s '3fi --, ._�. �^7�•� �'3' {_.:� ': a� •-• �`R� ---_.� . • 50 ji1, _� sol 01-449Q�-040-40 .. . yveed cuttinn • ` ` p y��4..'� .: �: ' a, � , <. r 52 4�'.r* .' o-'�'. ' ..:w:;y:. , . . .•+";,'u,.e,a�;A.j�;,�;�^x +`' - ��01=45tA0=050-50,� . `M.�"��"�'�'� �; : a�a > r-tree. r��'�"x'�,, ��'� �;�, ° �,r.: >x,: "�'�+,. �;�� :;��. .) , �°zi 3<�� . _ [4 �so�("; ,s, �.� , . 1.,Qt60.00 ' ... ,,� . l66I , 3 t rf1tAQ(�Ql(G - tsa 69 . Jo •-� » '•-' 72 "b. : A. �;;s. 'k." ;„, ^�,qxbn:k�,e��Rao�'F �w; >;:r..:".:��"j:.� `",��.�xa• ��r;.y�. �s; .��,�„�vy,z;: ..sx ,��} 74i'�• ^,�'.^z x �»��` x .�'n"^�c^+ :f^s�,i.� .,;b�.a'ack:.d,e �r. .�"`�° i'.s- ��`;998:�9.�ix §:�,� .ra �; �;�� s•.. . :°".s"z, `u�.�i,xp:ey�'�,r"4%s"x,.r;»: «$' ,�8:.-,s�;i�•8;•� ..��`�..>�. ay�,$.7 t Fri 9c45 AM Terocs Check Nurnber �1tID : Check �. ;;,�¢� :' � > - Number.: Vendor,ANarne ,,� �. . .. FS�-at 4 'raron rt, Temo Check Nurnber 54 5anitarv Products Ca 54 Sanitarv Rroducts Cc, 53 54 108 , Totals Temn Check Nurnber 7erno Check Nurnber JJ. ^ S�J S't ,7�Se6f'1 �O YY�C � �.. a.t .... `' `" A�'�3] ��O�hQl=k� Nurnh�r . iema Check Nutsher ,�6 s. ,:�56 Schumachers' Inc � `�-56=Schumachers Inc .-s�,�'� . � ,x{x 332 Ta�als Tesna Check Number r. Terna�rGheck iVcstnber" ,.. 57 . .rFY>, �;oi �,` �: .-` ..`,.>^^,�.t;!�`�'<.�T.�'°... � . ` 5�'� C�' E,.8fi'auo n s,y_,jr . 57 � E 8haucshnessv 3r 57 L E Shauqhnessy Jr 5'7 L E Shauqhr�essv Jr ,,��::T,,:�57.L` E,FSliaiighrtessy�;Jr :�.. , ;.%, 57 �`L ;E ; Sti�uohriessv� .7r - , ; " ..'�� :57 Mf.:, E Stiaitqhrressy � Jr � 399 7atals Tema Check Nurnber .�i�.a�. Jr.�;'r.<°.a¢ <� .vK��: 5 � ^ m��r �3z'J. ;.€:'. �y£,Temb`aGaheck'��iVujrmber:�`'k; ``:''' ,.58' . ..e'3ti4.i "�?''a [*[' 6�; �b y� a..'7rt ; jb^".y:� 3. 58 Steinirroer Ganst J� ' � %.Tatals Teino, Check Number °* p ..�z-y • x. . : ». � .� f. s ": ��":,N �?�,. r, ��_":-%...,,� „,.<,.Y�;a '�'��,.,.. .:ri . �' � ,•�Y. .';s* 'N,:�'� �!'i`.� <=7emo'-•�C#ieck-^Nurnber`:"" �4:��:",;' �S9 59 Tessman Seed ;.�, �; � �,,�. '.c J� � j>.Y .,:< J9�,::f�.,"":`� :w :,5��"M �o�t7s Yy3� ., .a, ,,,s'��P d, �. `� �� . :j's�:„ � ��irstals.�Te�nu Ghe�k �Number": � :�: �� 'l:a�"� ' �Sw ..5. �., i �" s. "' a n '.:`'a��.� � �c�,� e*"�yd ih t� �i�3 VA�Y �' .--Gitv c,F+Mer�cic�t� Fieiohts Maoe r I .__�_._.__.._.._.....__. _.. ..__. ._ .,-_.,. �,..__..__......_....«_�. �,.,_�_�...... ` � � . � Account Code Gorasnents ' ' Amaunt . ' ` ` i (� s �^ 6 . --.�.--•_--._._ _. . ._ .__..,.. ... .. .__- - ---...�_._,------ 99$.97 �� ' _...___..JJ _.._ ._._... _ .. ... _.._. _.�_»..,_.....__... . ._.__.�__...__.,__ i e i , �9 70j{� �ti, i`- n 2! ._"_"_ ' �73 08-4335-Q�00-0� . _ ._..__..... solvs --- —._�.— s2�.95 ,,:,.- 08-4335-000-00 so 1 vs 8. 40 ��-''- :c _. _. _ _... - - - .�_._._,___._.-- --.�___.—�.___----T._,�..__..._-331.35 �«_..— :f � �4 ��e ..._. .. _ . ..._. .. .. -- -.._ _ _.._._____..�.�..__._..�_�__------._.._...._._._.---- _--- �^�! ��:r ....�_Qt1-�t.S.�Q{—�tgQ"�JQi . .�. OdY"t.5 ___�.__...__...�___..�_ I�.�,.�.rJ" i=^+ �__...., _ _ .._.. ._ _._, .'bt '�..�� Ft . e za�. as ;�� -___�+5 .____ ... _. ._. ___ ....-•--- - ._. ___ __.-------• ---• ze . l,��, ia, � �3?' _.�..e'___""'_"" ^ "_...... ._._......4...__... .._ ._. _�.__._' _ �.. _�. 01-4330-�15-70 �olvs 169. @0 �4' - 01-A330-i f 5-7¢+ d i scount 3. 38cr s=5� .__�..__.� _ - - - - --....__.._...__.--- _..___.__.__._.-_ 165.6� i � ise� J6 i's9s. «, ...�_..._..« __». _. «._. __��......_ _.�...._.�_..«.__ —._ i45• . �42� . . . : . .. . ., iLsl. _ 01-4�2Q�-132-10 _--- --_ ._._._._ _ _. ._�.�9uo_satc � _ "772„�t.�_ .• <t � Q�-�t�20-f3�-15 Ru0 sVc i$0.40 � 1�-4�2tb-132-60 Ruo svc 288.65 �«' fl3-4220-13�C�00 Au_p sVc 162'y 3�, � 21-42�0-132-00 -_..___-��, _ � Ac�a 'svc" - ' � � . .. ., 216. 50` u, ;�� " ' ,,� `t��"�':�'��= t� sol�^� 14-4�20-132-00 s• Aug.`svc ' ��,�1:488.`3@-�� :`-� :;,,,x�F�s,�� 0"3-446Q�-000-0a CJ8_.w_...._.....—..._" @9-446@-00Q1-0�t .R,.^;��}IQ�=.;``sYa`��„'. tt,ay�, 5 � � a � y. x,o"i, %g`;1,a g'" . ,'i�.., r. ,. ..>. . . . . '�'e'�• ovrnt 1 89-f�E Kens ..x": ,; . solvs 89-6 Kens �..�t�a'',"'.��.''��.�aiti�,?��"��t?y',€v ?"�'�y ir�.�.:...:;<fF=�'b��f-,.4Rin..�x.. �; �.�sTe._.i:2 -e. � , ". +sz E3 54 "? 4. 510. 041 ssI - 56 " •.<_ ; "', � � � s,. , ti ; 's�� , : "'�^M1� d:;�.,� ` e.i� , "'4� Y�!y i 9� � • '`^�' . .'_�;'� , „ z,i, . ; � :s0�I �$. �7,�l=@Q� „ (62! , ,83 j6�i �� : � ..�' �% ,.vey. �65: ) • y F%'� ! - �:_ . • � . ,` N;i.,'. ' j6� ` o ✓{"'..`. ,s, . f�',t' ` 68 69 10Y. j 1. �03. 45 �, �..: n V_�:.•,',.speu � � �� x� ;.a� �.;$,.;..'�- '�'"%'�rx �" � 1': �03:�45 ",�:, �•� ' x;�, ; . . � .�, � _ .,.�,...,��.7s:..-._. _ . _, .� .,,.m.re�,«�'v;nr:F� .,�.:a�� "ti.i�<t�z:�'... '•t ! �...a o a �I�a L. L L� 4 _...._.�_ '..�..__�_�__._v . F�aoe lti� •� Pri 9046 AM -.--------._._._._. -Citv cr'f Mendr,ta NeiQhts G Terno Check Nurober 6Q� ' Check e :z.�`i.; . . --.•.___... ._...___.. _. .. .____....__. .. _ ..._.__..._.._---_ -. .. _.____._. .�._.__.__......�_._.� , . ' �� Number•., Vendor , Name .�' t " " ' . ' AccGurrt Code Cocnrnents ' Amaunt a, n . „s s „�,v.. � _..�__..._—_.___.._ - --.��----------- __.__._,_ _� " �5@ Traohv 1-lause 01-A48�-Q370-7¢+ Re KitteMball �9.8� .5 _� _____ 5 _._____ ._....._._..___._.__..__.._ --------..___._.___.�_ ---_---�__--_-----.--.-._,___._�9..8��.._._ ' �.,;. Tot al s�,7emo Check Number 60 � H :Ay�' .. .. �. . 9 ' S� raher � �t„��---__--- -- ---.. ._...v.._. . . ._. ..- --_...__.._ _.._--------•----�---._..� _.._ ,o " 61 Turf Suonly Ca �5-4330-::15-70 solvs 34�.93 ,z _ -- --•-•-�--� � - • --- .... _ . . _ _... _�.. .._ ,. _ .. ____.._._.-.._. .�. __.. ..- ---.. _ .._... _ .... . _ _-_ _.--- .._ __ _. __,..__..-- ,� 61 34�.93 '" Toials Temp Check lUumber 61 75 ` ^ � .__ �.....""""'_' '._...... ._... .. _. __.._�. __»_._,.....� __�__.�_-_...___.�...._'______'..�""..__.... �__..�...._._.__._....__" 'G Temo Check Number 62 ,� ,a o es#._Cummurss.c.a�.ians_____--- ?�1-9�20-110-10_. _ __.__.__ ..�_____..-.Auo-suc._.-----.._._.._-__..._.— ��4..�1 t9 �:;62pU,�=S West�"Carnmuriicatior�s 01-k210-P��m-20 Auo svc 543.23 �o ` '�; :6� .-il S Wesi�;Comrnunicat iorts 01-k�ifd-Q�40-4� pun svc 56. 75 .. : � .< . z, ., ,, ., �#=Ca�mrnut�icat.ians_._-_.�____05-4�10=105-15 --_ . _ ..._____..___._...Y.Ruo.-svc_..___�_.. __.._ _..._ . .--, --_ �...._-------2�3.-1 __,��_..__._..� 22 64 U S West Camrnunicatior�s 15-421�-@6@-60 Aua svc 39S•86 �� 52 U S West Cgrnrnunicatic�r�s �i-4�20-050-50 Ruo svc 3�.63 �< .�t-.Cuaununicat,%or.,s___.____._.@1-A�10-070-70�..- --_. _._.___.�__..____Aun-sv.c�____ _...__..__.__. .._____.._ __�__..�.3�.53_,.._r.�___---- I25 ,� `',` �,•:.�62, LI;.S West ;Communicat iarrs �1-4210-030--3Q� Aun svc 133. 15 .,,,, : . 26 � ' ;> ". . ��`•fi2..U'-S West�«'Carnmunicatians @i-4210-05@--5fk Rua svc 39.37 >�.. ..a;.�. �....�..�. «,� ,; .. ; 2' ^�, .. "" < . _ �.. ._. __._..__. _ __._ Auo -6vc—..__ ______---. ___ ._. _.�..__._____.__..--,39.�3'7---...-.- ct--Cc,rriu�unicat-ior�s___________01--421tD-070-7¢�----••--� . _ . ze E,� U S West Comrnunications i5-4�10-060-60 Aua svc 39.37 13a 6? U S West Garnraunicatians 01-4220-2+7Q+-74� . Auq svc �►8.4� , ¢- . . -- �a�,`�,.w `�`'"7tt/+.:a°:..=rz-z�'';-,;%;:'`�:'w`sx �;,'•�a" M ._____.-....___.____...__....____._.� _.�.�.�-. -___.._._._-..,._.._ 1.854. f7 y >.,.,.. �:�.,.,- � �< �`;;,r4�;Totals: Terni�<Check`.Nurober 6� 33 `S;d.. n, i �_.�.._.�.__. ....." "" "" "'.��.. .. _,,...._......�_�_.�._�..� ..,__.....__.._..._r..__�.."...__ �...� «..__.___...._._��T.._ 3a °.. �@(QB ��'1E'Cit fiiUtR�tEY` 6J 35 36 �.,p�i1I81L.�i• ti P�4� L a.1y�070 _ - �eot_.c4r.�t.r ._.__. _... � � �0.@._0.0 37 .7s. ' .�"y.'��i's �F.bY=,'+:� . . , r�- :w.+�x. ��` :, �. ' ��._�..� y 4' ,.._ „ .v s , � z 38 �...M.s .: � .. ;,.4,3�r�z"�,`i;�';:..'r.,.,> !f�ry� ry. � �• u : . . �<°'4 ��.e `�k .F:'�ay.K.• , • ^ VVYJ� �Yi .y�;�- �v� �yE ye �' . R."•` �, n�.i .:" . .,...� . ;� , ; . � n .: ,,. .� ... ,»._x ... . : �gg x��,.,e. ..... ,... , . _ . ..,-a:"i^"r_.a_�1_��.r�__._"ni�..,�.'xt._�t__.._"" .. �� : . _ _..___...— . : •y tf %'a < �,s, • .,.::, _�. .,, - $ s�:a��;: .,:�:.�<��t�%Mt � � .� ial ;�; �� ,�:�°-:.' . ,._b��'�"' d., , <...-�`�. ;.,3�s._ -t'• :�E:"�� ..} , ''4'�. �«+,efie'�'��? , � .<.bY:* r .. . , : ' � „� �..� . , a.>s•>,•.w. •Mi qi� �MSv„x }. .. � ; ./„'Y.' ..L '� q Yi a r �+ ^ 4' � ',.'t'�.'z%J�:.. N�i.' `�ZZ �:f:i?'+,e - ft ;..',�i,t"�4"^ �t f:3s,-yA �>6,�y,^Y� �'Cin�°38�:'�..i�.§�':v�,<�.'.'�"• ,'�3�• « x;°^3.a�.,�' +6'�'a � l54..94Q+.51 : , . ,., s, �:Ei. .�J� �,0 l�� . �. . .. 3 ��...-..--.,.-�-..�'��' • '�_.�.. � � ...�.�-�-. . . .�.�.��..-.�....-,.-�.. . _ .�"..�..�'�,. "�....�.:'� �. ...., e --«..-�....�� ..«... - ��...-..�.�.�......��...�'. -. -... � —.�...�« "�..` . � ' t t, . ° -.� . . n � �, � :'=, .;� ,k d . ., 2 n r..s:,;�.;�.,,. » "s» .�.� :c � 'g. , a�` 9 � ;s;�.d., c. , 4 5 � !9 a•�` .> .g _^ , ,o ii I's ` . �; " , , .. . � 4.' N' p . . �'-3" f" .. .. < . .�/"?'b.f��» , x. � < ..5, i' �.r,; cC�a ��`�� Hp� ,..y.y.' i�•. ��S..�s+,^'$5�;"t:;y"�'a(^y'g:.� o''%�.' . ..,. . . r' :3r. yez„ �.5. .� §4., a�;^�.'� 's�t: , fi y,:.%. , ^°:A�.Aa..... � ". " f:f N . ..v . + 137 3 ' <.• > b: rt :.p � �. ` , �\,�°.q ,� � ' a {�: •38 i ��. w .. .> ":;/atr,:?°';!•'�. ;<,,' ':�4°,^'e.�'''}�R'.._: [.?."".. � �M, 4. ..;. ,`:�:. ' S � (39 "'Rr�'�`'^�b�au. . ,.. , "s"' •. � ' , 1�fANflAL CHECKS �--------- ---- -----------_....-----_. _._____.�__ � _; �'1 .�• 137.78__.___$7A.00__.Kath�,�e_r� A,pderson Refund lannan fee Ca 92�06 i<! __L_.__. �_9 —_�..----_._-- --- 13779 60.00 Sensible L. U. Coalition regr �� !c < 13780 80.00 Minn Dept Public Saf�ty Regz P. D. � - �•,• __._._._137_BS..�..T.r34Z..8.$_,Sunwo.od_Inn_.&_Conv • . Re P. D. conven8ion � t � - � -•--- -----•-------•—•---- I , i 13782 696.72 Co�nericaS.AsphaZx, wear mix discouLt invoice � �=' i' c;ta 13783 � 883.'S8 Norwest Bank. , 8/22 .payrolZ ;,, �+. �_._.I37.84._._._3.,556.9S...State_CapitoLC..U.. ' " • - --�_._�._-----.--,-••---...- —_--- ':�' 53785 380.00 Natl League of Cities zegr MaymD conference ��; Z3786 13.84 PERA 8/2I payroll � ..�.__.33Z87_ _. 8,730.98 ---~-----------------------._ ."_—_.---•----- � � _ ._.._ __.-• --- --.-.---• -- -------. _._�._.___._ �..___ 33788 3,525.91 Colnmissioner of Rev " 13789 42�.00 Dakota County Bank , " t �� ; ;, --. _....13790 15,083.33- ------�.r__�_ _..--��2�1Th'lh�--•------•------._._.._..--- --••.-�-----•---• ------__. �.----- 1379Z 45,227.05 Fayroll a/c 8/2S pagroll Z3792 Z35.00 KathZeen Swanson 8/21 daycare '• - 13793,.__ 20;2'10.50 M...F,. Fleischasker Re Xens�ton Park '"`� 1:.( �'•:! ------.._..__ 100,226.70 .. ._ .. .�..__ _....� ..----- �--•-----�.__.. �aei ..--• - ----- - .._ _.._.. _ _ .. _ .. .----� -------�_.� . I��' _ I''' . � .,,_ - I�� ._.._ ._�.T._. ._26.5,16.7._.'23� .. ._..._.. _'-� �� ' �'" • ;.a.� ,.:y.;.�:,; ,a��,�" o;� . „ , * s�' i' k;' Y? ., e �ry,'? e� ,;.o:`; , - ' ,, a. :. �� , . .,.. .. r >. . .� .. `� , o . , . . , ..;�, �q^%� T,�, '`,�r�i;• 'A:,.�� y:4 "" .. - 'Y � �. � ,.' . � . t.,y .�., . ,.'e • �' � , . , a .. s��i sd':.,;Sj� .aYA:¢Oi �.�t*+n:` . Yfi; `' . ' J�w^..�si� i�� .et�b8, i6�a)t,"y� �L° iX A�'NfiE�. r.. I 56 "i. ° 4✓ - o>° ':.�.. 8 e�� . � p �G ':.r. '/ � .. .c �, {� ,1 �'3�� >•'^R. $:• Z �•,bY � " wt� a`�.,'��',.'",. ,.,.�',.r• �� a • ��.e,".A�.t .�z% ax.'C'.f� � a -�7` : `i . ; �.. 'Yno. '°:pte+'.: ;ys''?:�••+j c.i;n:^;�.r-?'.5:,,'`. .•=��..`yr�r`,y,,. r >.,c' F ... � A�., : Y.s.. s y. . F ;��:-.:��n<�«i:Yl«;'�".„,. ._.,� ° .:;�''��'�i.E'�` r'P.�;,.> � s• '••z'ar�.. s �; w '�',�'w » " c' `` ,'" °.'•,4�„& .' �,�', , ' � .•<. �.x,6w.�"' :e ,«i o_^i�'�r'"=�•::�Hw�« �•.x:d.';.Y'.Sq;�°#!�° .r'a 7 5a'� . 551'-� t5E} 57' . . ;e; . . ,< �66I • • r . �5S; ,GO. I6L G?; ��: �4± '65' , < �66' � ^ • ' 'f&I `.N"•x i.4-• ; �,<;. :,,�. 1 �`4.:*Y :Y •.s,:. � :,a�+?a:r'• .�y:. ,s.,.. ".s.,. :y S: '�". „ u:3.`d,"�',��•,�y"�`x3'e'1. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City FROM: SUBJECT: DISCIISSIO�T August 31, 1 92 Administr Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager Rensington Park - Expand Irrigation System Council approved the low bid submitted by Albrecht Irrigation for $10,600 to install an irrigation system for the soccer fields and some•turf and landscape areas in the park. This system was not designed to provide full complete coverage of all turf areas. The systems installed at Sibley and Mendakota Parks were similar in their coverage. Since completing the Sibley and Mendakota Parks the difficulties of establishing adequate�turf in non-irrigated areas has been embarrassingly evident. Some additional heads were installed at Mendakota Park to partially cover areas by the picnic shelter and main entry to the hub area. Many areas, most notably the entrance berm with the sign, is not irrigated. � RECONIl�NDATION I recommend expanding the Kensington Park irrigation system so as to achieve total coverage of all turf and landscape areas. The expanded system is illustrated on the attached map and a quote from Albrecht is also included. Bid 1 aad 2: Bid 3: Bid 4: Valve, feed line and drip irrigation system for 15 plus trees•on south end of field. Main line and 13 heads to cover boulevard along Stockbridge. Main line and 8 heads to cover landscape berm. Bid 5: Main line and 3 quick-coupler attachments for use of maintenance personnel to water 123 trees and shrubs planted on NSP right-of-way under power lines. ACTION REQIIIRED If Council so desires, they should approve expanding the irrigation system and direct staff to issue a purchase order in the amount of $3,330.00 to Albrecht Irrigation. MTL:kkb , �� ALBRECHT IRRIf.�ATION DIV. 1408 West County Roafl C• RosevilTe, Miunesota 55113 •{612) b33-4�10 •�AX {GI2) G33-IG75 � / � �� C �� uc= �E'�� n.��u�� 1 �.c+��r^��m � ��, l D #' � ,2_ � 1��0�00 t,5 85� �aa 3ti�� ,p2S:� A►Db _-.. �� 'S � �IO.C�� o� �� 9 � '� '3,� `-1 CJ, 00 _ -- ��- � ��-'... ,._-...._.—. ---- �v ; �-{ `"� F-r��- !1� f� ��'�� — _ .� c�.c� u� �" C�t C 5,��1 d DESIGN, SPF.CIF�CATION, INSTALLATION AND SERVICE i 0 rrl �--LJ e . � /; �o\ \ \ \ '� l�,y�TFi \, � iQ IJ � <o \l I % �'� `� � �e ' � � %� , � \`•. . �� ''�1 ` � .\ � i % ,, . �v m � � ' , �� . i5 -- ! 0 . ,� � ' �, . 3 Qu cK �0 BI� 3 � ��, ��r - Q . . ia `a PARKING LOT tih (79 SPACES) ` ` • , Q `iQ � � ' . �J CJ� . ♦ � O , ', j10�=T�-i SHE TER ' 992 \ \ ♦ PLAYGROUND � ��' , \\ 13 ' ig O AREA '� � 0 a J I �, � ` ., ; \ S �t � \ ♦ � \ � �. \ 10 � 10' FE RESTRO�OM$ ` � � 4p5,15 � � IO�FENCE �� ' ' M M \ \ � ti � . �� `� \� `\ \\. � 10�4 . \� \' •. \��.y��,��` \ VA � � \`\ \ � �V'� \ � \ 240' 230' ` �\ FNr� "��" ""' 452 62 2-GA 40' 0/C l� ! 5- GA 3�i� 0/0 �,�D��l� , �! � � , � . � �� 4-AL 40� 0� � � � L=207 54 = 3� 53 ' R•3054.79 2 GA 40' 0/C 3-R � :: CITY QF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � • August 28, 1992 s TO: Mayas and City Council .� FROM: Tom Lawell, City �ldministr SUBJECT: Child Protective Services Day Proc3amation i3ISGUSSION The City has been can�acted lay the Mendota Area Jaycees who request that the Ci�y cansider procl.aiming Thursday, September 17, 1992 as Child Protective Services Day. The Jaycees are hosting an event related to child safety a� Henry Sibley High.Schaol on �he 17th to help educa�e kids and parents on �his important subject (see attached flyer). As you will notice, the Mendata Heights Police Department will also be involved in the event by offering the oppor�uni�.y to have your chil.dren finger printed. In addition, Ms. Patty We�terling wi1.l be• present as the �eatured speaker. RECOI�N'DATION In recognition of the contributions being made wi�.hin the community by the Mendota .Area Jaycees, T recommend that the Council adopt the prepared Proclamation. ACT�ON RE4USRED If Council agrees with the recommendation, a motion shauld be made to proclaim September 17, 1992 a� Child Pro�ective Serva,ces Day within Mendota Heights. MTL:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAROTA COIINTY, MINNESOTA PROCL�M�ITION ACiINOWLi3DG2NG SLPT�ER 17, 1992 AS CHILD PROTECTIVL SERVICES DAY �. �HEREAS, the Minneaota Jaycees are part of the World's Largest Non-Profit Youth Leadership Organization; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Jaycees have more than 10,000 members in the State of Minnesota, dedicated to Community Development, Individual Development and Management Development opportunities in their communities; and WHEREAS, The Minnesota Jaycees are dedicated to helping and supporting Missing Children of Minnesota; and �PSEREAS, the Minnesota Jaycees are dedicated to and supportive of family life programs in Minnesota; and �IHEREAS, the Minnesota Jaycees/Mendota Area Jaycees are dedicated to educating and informing the parents and children of Minnesota, about.child abductions and the safety precautions that can be �taken. NOW THERSFORE, I, Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor of the City of Mendota Heights, do hereby proclaim that the community acknowledge Thursday, September 17, 1992 to be CH=LD PROTECTIVS SERV=CES DAY in Mendota Heights. Proclaimed by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 1st day of September, 1992. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor 9 � S' -,�::':'r::'^`'.;.,�•.,5-0.•., ;; �Y r MENDATA AREA JAYCEES �,, WELCOMES � GHIII) PROTECTIYE SERYIGES DAY Thuraday September 17th, �992 5:3o p.m. to 9=0o p.m. � HENRY SZBLEY SENTOR HIGH SCHOOL i897-Aelaware Avenue East West Saint Paul. Minnesota 55118 Pragram Highlightsr 5:3d-9:4o Finger Pr3nting of Children-by West Saint Pau2/ Mendota Heights Police Depari:mentg. 6r00 Missing Children af Minnesata Specia3. Presentatian For Parents and Kids on Child Protection..,. What ta do? How ta say "ti4" tc Strangers. Featured Speaker� MS. Carol Wataon. Yrom Missing Children of Minnesota. 6�3o First Aid SaYety/Fire Prevention Workshop Sy the Mendota Heights Fire Depar7:ment• 7�00 Featured Speaker� �f5. PATTY WETTERLING From the Wetterling Foundation. 8�00 Working Parent Reaonroe Center Semi.ztar Featured Speakex� idS. MARCI BR0016, Director af Ytorking Parettt Reso�tee Genter in Dawntown St. Paul. Minnesota. M.S. Braoks trill talk abont the noon haur parenting workehape that are offered in downtown St. Paul. The Working Parent Resouce Center will a2sa have an infarmatian table at thie event. •' •`,tl:�` � �•• : +� i.. � : . ��.'°•''' "�i'. � ni�� riw� � �' '. . � � � �� • M CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �� August 26, 1992 TO: Mayor, City.Council and City Adminis � FROM: Klayton H. Eckles �,�}� f Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Assessments Rolls Lennox - 7ob No. 9106 (Imp. 91-3) Bridgeview Shores 3rd Addition - Job No. 9110 (Imp. 91-5) Mendota Woods - Job No. 8922 (Imp. 89-'� DISCUSSION• A public hearing on the above assessment rolls has been set for 7:45 P.M., 7�esday evening. I have not received any objections regarding the assessments from the affected property owners. RECOMMENDATION• I recommend that the City Council hold the required public heari.ng and adopt and confirm the assessment rolls as submitted. ACTION REQUIItED: If Council concurs with the recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 92-_, RESOLiTTION ADOPTING AND COrfFIItMING ASSFSSMENTS FOR MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINFSS PARK 2ND AND 3RD ADDITIONS (IlVIPROVIIV�NT NO. 91, PROJECT NO. 3); BRIDGEVIEW SHORES 3RD ADDITION (IlVIPROVIIVIENT _ NO. 91, PROJECT NO. �; AND MII�TDOTA WOODS (IlVIPROVEMF.I�TT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 'n. . � • City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLU'i�ON NO. 92- RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND COIVI+IItMING ASSESSMENTS FOR MENDOTA HEIGHT5 BUSINESS PARI� 2ND AND 3RD ADDITIONS (IlVIPROVIIVIENT NO. 91, PROJECT NO. 3); BRIDGEVIEW SHORES 3RD ADDITION (IlVIPROVIIVIENT NO. 91, PROJECT NO. �; AND MENDOTA WOODS (IlVIPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 'n BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights as follows: WHFREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, has calculated the proper amount to be specially assessed for the costs incurred to date with respect to Improvement No. 91, Project No. 3 consiruction of sewer, water storm sewer, streets and curb and gutter improvements to serve the following described property situated in the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota. County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Mendota Heights Business Park 2nd Addition and Lot 1, Block 1, Mendota Heights Business Park 3rd Addition WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, has calculated the proper amount to be specially assessed for the costs incurred to date with respect to Improvement No. 91, Project No. 5 construction of sewer, water storm sewer, streets and curb and gutter improvements to serve the following described property situated in the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: Bridgeview Shores 3rd Addition WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, has calculated the proper amount to be specially assessed for the costs incurred to date with respect� to Improvement No. 89, Project No. 7 construction of sewer, water storm sewer, streets and curb and gutter improvements to serve the following described property situated in the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: Mendota. Woods WHEREAS, the proposed assessment mlls have been on file with the Clerk and at all ti.mes since filing have been open for public inspection; and notices thereof have been duly published and mailed as required by law. Said notiee stated the date, time and place of such meeting; the general nature of the improvement; the area proposed to be assessed; that the .� proposed assessments roll have been on file with the Clerk; and that written or oral objections thereto by any property owner would be considered; and - WHEREAS, said hearings were held at 7:45 o'clock P.M, or as saon as possible thereafter on September 1, 1992, at the City Hall in the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Mayor announced that the hearing was open for the consideration of objections, if any, to said proposed assessments; and + , all persons present were then given an opportunity to present oral objections, and all written objections theretofore filed with the Clerk were presented and considered. NOW THEREFORE, this Council, having heard and considered all objections so presented, and being fully advised in the premises, and having made all necessary adjustments and corrections, fmds that each of the lots,�pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the proposed assessment roll was and is specially benefitted by the construction of said improvements in not less than the amount of the assessment, as corrected, set opposite the description of each such lot, piece and parcel of land, re- spectively, and that such amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein described; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proposed assessment roll as so corrected is hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper special assessment for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land respectively, and the assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of seven percent (7�) per annum accruing on the full amount thereof from time to time unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon such parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment as to sanitary sewers, storm sewers, and watermains shall be payable in equal amounts extending over a periad of nineteen (19) years and each assessment as to streets, curb and gutter shall be payable in equal amounts e�ctending over a period of ten (10) years; the first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment commencing thirty (30) days from the date hereof to December 31, 1993, to be payable with general taxes for the year 1992, collectible in 1993 (now designated as real estate taxes payable in 1993), and one of each of the remaining installments, together with one year's interest on that and all other unpaid installments, to he payable with general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid; and BE IT FiJR1'HER RESOLVED, that prior to October 2, 1992, the owner of any lot, � piece or pazcel of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the whole of such assessment, without interest to the City Treasurer; and BE IT FiJRTHER RFSOLVF.D, that the Clerk shall prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of said assessment roll with each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County, and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessments in the manner provided by law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this lst day of September, 1992. � CTTY C4UNCII. CITY OF NIl�ND02A I�GHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor AT1�ST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk k' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City August 27, 1992 Administr FROM: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Ass's�t SUBJECT: CASE N0. 92-26: Wiessner - Variance DISCIISSION Mr. Glen Wiessner, of 1876 Valley Curve, appeared before the Planning Commission to request a variance to the front yard setback requirement in Section 4.5(4). See attached Planner's Report and Application. The Planning Commission felt there was a practical difficulty on this property, in that the homes on Valley Curve all front on the alley. The front yards on Valley Curve are all deep and are being utilized as rear yards. The applicant agreed to provide landscaping around the proposed shed and to provide more accurate dimensions on the site p1an. Mr. Wiessner visited City Hall on Wednesday and added the proper dimension to the site plan that is in your packet. The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to waive the public hearing. The Planning Commiasion voted 6-0 to recommend that City Council approve a front yard setback variance to allow a storage shed to encroach 21 1/2 feet into the legal front yard with the condition that the applicant provide a landscaping screen. ACTION REQIIIRED Meet with the applicant. Should the City Council desire to implement the recommendation of the Planning Commission, they should pass a motion approving a Front Yard Setback Variance to allow the storage shed to encroach 21 1/2 feet into the legal front yard with the condition that a landscape screen be provided. KLB:kkb PLANNING REP()RT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PREP.ARED BY: REVIEWED BY: PLANNING CONSIDERAI'.IONSs Background lNCORpORATCD CONSULTING ALANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCHfTECTS 300 FIRS7" AVEIVUE NORTH SLJITE 210 MIIVNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 G12�339•3300 25 August 1992 92-26 Glen R. Wiessner 1$76 Va11ey Curve Variance to front yard setback. Tim Mallay C. John Uban The applicarzt is proposing to build a 10- to 12-foot storage she� in the frant yazd of his progerty on Valley Curve Road. The Applicant's site plan is inadequate to determine how close the praposed shed wiii be from the front lot line. The drawing daes nat shaw the dimensian and is not drawn ta any scale that can be measared. Section 4.5(4) states that accessary structures shall not be closer to the front lot line than the principat structure. The praposed iacation af the shed violates this requirement. The Applicant's site plan alsa does not show the dimension between the shed and the side Iot line. Hawever, it would appear from the sketch that the minimum 5-faat setback could be met. These dimensions should be verified priar ta gcanting tha variance. � The shed's appearaace is consistent with the ApplicanYs hame, and the progosed shed does nat exceed the 144 foot maximum area allowed for accessory structures, Variance Criteris Grant%ng a variance reqaires tlxat there be a"practical difficulry" related tn the unique shape, size, or other characteristics of the praperty that would preclude its reasonable use. Aaving a shed in a� suburban area cleazly qualifies as a reasonable use of the properry. However, the subject property is relatively large and has a substantiai rear yard. The Applicant has indicated that he does not want ta lacate the shed in the rear yard because this is the usable portion of his property. In additian, the main entry of the home is located on this side af the lat and the awner feels there would alsa he more of an aesthetic impact if the shed were locate� in the rear yazd. Strictly speaking, minimizing the incanvenience of the property owner's use af the remainder of-his property daes not qualify as a ,A � r Glen Wiessner, Case No. 92-26 25 August 1992 Page 2 "practical difficulty". However, we would agree that there would be more of an impact on the appearance of the area if the shed were in the rear yard. The subject property is located in a unique azea where the front yazds are steeply sloped down to the street. '�his limits the use of the front yazds on this block and most of the adjacent residents utilize the rear yard for outdoor activities. This block is also chazacterized by ample vegetation in the front yards. The subject property has several large trees in the front yard that partially screen the existing home from the street. In addition, Valley Curve is a very lightly travelled street. As a result, views of the front yard areas of these lots are limited. All of the properties on this block have access off of an alley at the rear property line. Due to these characteristics, the proposed shed would have a minimal impact on the appearance of the area. The adjacent property has a swimming pool and deck in the front yazd. The home on this lot is also located closer to the front lot line than the proposed shed. The surrounding property owners have signed the Applicant's consent form. Due to the unique character of the lots on this block and the fact that other accessory structures have been similazly located, we believe the requested variance is reasonable. Landscaping should be required to fully screen the shed from Valley Curve Road and adjacent properry. Action Review the Applicant's materials, consxder waiving the public hearing, verify the exact dimensions of the setback from the front and side lot lines and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the requested variance. , „., ,,��—i . ..... . ... .. � • . . . . �,; : . . ' . . � ; ; �, . � '7 : !IIlI , , ” • ' SOMERS .. .... . F ' • • • ,,• • �• • i * ; � � • • S � � � ' GOtiNTRY r � � • . +. . � . � • • �1 • • ' • • ♦ • • + � � 9 • ` . •-� � • • • • • • � _i 8 tri y;� • ..• � � • t� A A i �— Huu G�. � • • • • � � WELI �' •i • • � i • ' • 1�� ` • � • � '.v__ GOLF _ CO {`/ Q • 'i , � • ( •:� / ,,.,�, -: • j 11 � • + / '�` y i i ' � i � 1 (Rivate) '� � 1NENTYYORTM �•" � • i N � PAltlC �:.: .. —° � �. . � � • i �a � j'•� �� '� i ,W u � � 1 � � _ �, . . !� • � • 3 . � . . i. r . • :,, . : • 'i%C ' � i �, �' • ��j • � � � \ _ . . � �+I � � � � _ • — � . N � ,I • • �_ � � � , � __ • ; p � �. : -. o� _ �AI � —Y'1 • � • (aT � �-`l � ' ` . � . ! ' : . t : . � ' ' i---l: i � .. •� , � • / • � '�• �' 1 ` • � � a^ � p Q' . � � I ._._.. a�,, � � • � I • • � �I ��--1 . 7� � • �. • �cn• : �� . • �,# i � . � � • � � � • • ._, --_-----� �� "_� �� i I '' �-.. _....L ` oa:,.a .�•; �..�� ` ' � . . , r s �i • ` �£l�i00T8 NEtGMT.f IAt 1 � PAR S GOLF GOU4�t • r� �i ' j � • • % • `O+GI`'�._ N efi'. ( PuBI�C) ♦ I j" ��j i �� J � � 1 1 t / t � /;1 • • • ; ' � I ' c� 1 � D. �• , . . , �I �� • . . � �f --- f � � � � � + _ -�.,. ,. � . , : , T , T 1 . ' • • . ,,, �� = !^� . ./ f I • � T ] �� r � t � • • • —__ . � , �. .. 'i i ' • • / ♦ � h�' t 1 1, � I �:i � � � � � • • -• . Y - i/ � . 1 g 4' \ - ti`"' � I . : _ _ ' _ !' . � _• � — .i! ,� •- - �. � \ \ _ t �-� � . ,_ '" '��f ��.,' ...��„ .• . ��l -- • � • ' ,r'-� � � ' • , �� y t44 w� � ' • • _ — _ — � � * ` • ' + � * •' " + ' ' � y._ _�' ! ` • � ! ��} . � MtM CMCLL � ♦ • /' • • • • • • • • • • � . � ' • • • � • i � iY � _ • • � • ' � . . • • • �.-� ' � � • • � • • • w � � � . s � � i � / . , • r, , �,. , • , _ , • �� _'° � 1`` • • � s • + i! � � - : ` � , tl . ' � � !I y • • • . •t � � � ' .ucc �T , � • ' �- -- � �_ � '� �� . . : �• • • . , SUBJECT PRfaPERTY � > • •� • . � =- <� �� • . . . . . � ' � --- _ � � i� . :.pEii. aa�= uu . • . �. . :. ....:... _ ` ' ' � NC}RTN " - o �` •' � � • ' . a ' „� ,�., p • SCALE 1 "=800' • � � �j' a • . 1-+°" . . .t ' � • � � �, • � �/ �-:: r.' � • • � • • s • � • . 3 • • // /- . i�`w,�,. � • � � • • + _ • ' t/ • ` � ^ � • _. * i • � , • • � f • ..�i�II ♦ i f . � � i O�I't � � . 1 1 _� � • • °c � � • • • ♦ . � • � � � � � i� � � • • � :�yr � � � i . • 1 � � ..� � � t J 'U'�,s-'.+'. , • � • • s � � • L,.:. �` : .. � � . • � , : � �� . . . 1 � ..� • �: •�• •�� •�• � . � . . . . , �. �:.. r . �' '_ • � �-_._._.� _ _� � - - a_ • � , _` ----� � „�..... • • • • '� � - ,,......,, —_.�_ �`---- � • . . . . •. . . � � - --�,� -� .� l �i � H 1 G W A Y -- �" �—..._ � �---� �----� c . � � �" �,.�� • `' � ,� t * .:� { =� �'. � • ' t O' •.�.+. . s . �. �..� � � )TA GOLF Cpl1RgE g, C0� NTRY CLUB ',,.:', .�� •, I t �zivat+�) ( ( �: -: ,y � .;,�r . 1 � �� `"` �� i�..��.i !� � • ,' ,! ' 1 � 7 = . —• _ � " _� •- - + . - �s ,f.�1 �'_- � �? . � j- • .-0• 06E _ __ 1� ' aA7uRE CEMT£ ��:":. . t - .i� r��.,._:�j•, � � • • •j• • • • + y � � •r-, .. ,.. `1 ,,.e ' r ' �.. ' _ _ I �� •1........ �w � �' _.�t� � • • • •.• • � 8 . . . i(„ � ' _ t • i • , � + � ' �L'W� �' ,./� .. t �= •�- w � �- ;1 . , ` _ ��•� _ . .• +\� ... � . . N �,,,..._�„ �--! r• o- `• � # L �J"� \� r h ' ° / � SU b NC g �, 1 w7� ' �,1 ' � 3 ' �� 9� yj ~~� << r I'9d Q Q 1 � �- � 1 � T � � a h 2 �.a +� � � z� : oQ a, � � � �3 t¢$ 3 � � 24 � z z � •� e �o�E � 33�� + J�, a . ,�,�,!{ C Z,9 .\` �Y�7 '4. �. �"' o � PL.AG E S 6 1� ♦ 6 t98.23 � . `� 419.?4 r ��PRlNG CREEK °!�' � � � `�,t � C�RCIE °/ b f° 7 6 - 50�� c o M � eb �s ��= o o j +o � ��'• 7 „ 8 � ,� � QGR�s - N I 0 80 • • �41.6J pE'��p�'9.7g , � �605E� � �p P4A� 221.14 '"y� Q . �.1 H. p8 1, x.J(7 U .� p �-� � tc �, 3 0 � �� c • N � � N a 8 i. 20 ^ I6y.lE ... %A ' ia C. �t � L� oo +:Ct�ft7 � N E � � ,� -`��C r A t� \ 2 .z3, a_ m "� O �',� �t ��a � ' '� 0 ._z�9 s i - -r-�' � 3j o a o ;:,....,.,, .z ' a g 4 e P . �� _� : ,.... � :� 36 � - n� `' ' 3 0 �y o h�. 6 s� n � I "� RO�. ��,-- F'FZEEWAY %ma Ftsch� 3 4 ,q c . 24 044-$ � �f G1 �A�.F'�ii'� � , �i'�lr;f�;t�7:}.{J3" l,`3�Fs Cr�11�1' {;t�2.=r.; M�:'ti.rl.r�i;�. HF i�,rkxt �. t''It1 :� �> 3 2$ ?:��.�}��t �, 19��' To wham i � ma�r ��3r,cprr, : I �Iti ��s3.ylT'i� �f�r .� .�.�.�'i,:s�:�� r.�[i ic�y �2«�er�'.,�' i� «xc�� ;{� �.�t ,� car�c�r'.��: �tr_��.ge f.;her,� i'ti �ii�.fi; th1 cit.y r.�l.I� .r�y ��'��rit ';:�r�1, `1'�`�.�; h;:tilc��tg ws.3.l k�� zr.� t�if��r #,�'t.�tf u'�} f��t is�#�.� t�f� "�r=�� y.�.z^�l." z}�t �sts.= l��t, w�si.cri i�� .ltao=��. 3�.1t1 f�et lorE�. T"r�e �-��,zi3_c-.�z'r,� t,7i7.1 r,��.x,v`t`� 1t� <c 12 ��cc�? Yse 9 f�Ft �':i�Yi, I# c�i.�7_ r�M �+.�1�t#.�c3 #,r.� �;�.a.ti.#'f �:rf� �ir�i�=.;� ctrt�3. i � y, j�.1�,e :�#,i:z �rt ��3r . P��t��c�ugh the p�c��1.e c�r� <7�zr lers�th c3f V� 11��.� ��ar�� e�tr_�.:z�3. i�:.�.�r� 1.�r�� 1f�tG.;, ruc+;;-!� c�f ��.zr �rc�nt y��'d. i�.; ur�.t.�.�aY�le 1'a�r�i,�Ue r�f �. ste�p r�iil., �`��i� f}� u� $r.s��a� ��U � tc-� �t�� l's.{�ttseF.; ��`f.��tf -#-.l't� �t��i� . �� :�1�_ �c.��'� r,ur tpairi etit � arsc� �'rr�ra tree Y�.�ck . Th� raack �� xrt3. �;�,r� trf��r� l�:�ael arfrl are trsc�r� :a��bl� �re�.s f��r 3.�wrr �3�rr�i�;�re, �.ir�, p1,.�z= �.reati rt�•. Z#.� iF.� "R;�LF1"$ft:iYf: r1eFi�`Eir�J_�, r�t.�t.Ye �F��t,�iF#;�.rr�ll.y �.1':��. p�'ar�tir£tlly, for rrs� tr, plac� �. �t.�,rage �-�u.ildi�.g r�ut ,i�e c,� #,�-�e �iar_k vard. T.�here it is cat�t r�f the kir1; piay area ar�r1 nr�t ir,. fia.�l ;�zew c�f n+�i�Yih�.�r� whc� rr,�.y }:,e F�itt,i.r�� ir� tY�eir v�r�;�. YJ� Yidve oril�r a or�e car gar�� rid it wc��ld b� a very �xpNr�;iv� ��r�}p�si.-F.ir-}ri t�� ¢ril�rg� it ?�.,ec�.u.s� �-af �;�r nr�Y�,e*,�.��.7/r,�}rfl�� t�i.�t i� betweer� the gar,��e �nd the houwe . �'itl�� }:i�.c '� tr,y=.� , biY,r�� . �..•�.W('1 �1�3.'�if3.#l.l�."F't �%'1..�itf.� +Ci.�� 'iilt:: FL1i1�.�%iE}fif� 3� �G1�iF'�r �'�f) �t�.+-�.i�f�:.�.lif 1. �.�s�� y�.rcl, ther� i�.; 't't�� r�oui-�t t$�.t wY TLP�C� �ic'�re stc}�'�.�;e r.f��xts. �.r�d �#;�'tF if1F�l �+l�s.�•� t�o �`i.�v� th� �;trt.�r�.g;F iFs WY�LFIE' I��r} rFy�.�Ff:#;irfE 7.-t.. . ,�., TY�ar�Y vv�.z f�ar yr��r cc-�r��aid.��atir,r�. �incerelY, G1Frir� R. Wi�ssn�r 9 '{ City oi 1��iendata Heig,ht� A,PPLICATICIN FUR CONSIDERATION ()F PLANIYING REQUEST Case No. a � �'�'' � Date of Application a- Fee Paid .5 G C�O o�,�l '�" /� W l�l��'- O�?� Apglicani Name: ��(�'SSriI�- {��f'rJ.� � PH: s.�' �.f,� � �.ytr (Last} (F'ust} (ivt� Aaa��: ��"'�(%a-u� � �.�.�� %?�f,r� � ,� /{r� �r�,�- s'�s-r r �' (1v,�nzber & street) � tcicy} (st�te) tZiP) Owner Naine: C.�J /�SSr✓�/L. t..� ��"ni.J 1�' •. (I-ast) tF'�rst) tM� Address: l � %� I%f�-��' �r' ��Jil�/� %�"/�� o �t r"S�rs �</ - �S`1 r � (Number & Street} (City) (State) {Zip} Street Location of Property in Quesdon: Legal Description of Frogerty: Type of Ret�uest: Rezoning ,� Variance Conditional Use Permit Snbdivision Approval Conditioual Use Permit for P.U.D. Wetiands Permit - -�" Plan Appmvai Other (attach explanadon) Comprehensive Plan. Amendment Applicabie City Ordinance Number �� 1 Section Present Zoning of Property Pxesent Use �E�'t�? �n( r>n � • Proposed Zoning af Property Proposed Use �l"�-`C'i D�'.uTrr1 �, . I hereby declare that a11 statements made in this request and on the ad 'tionat material are true. �� _ ) ��-K-t..,-- (Signature of Applicant} �� %/� �- .�� iv by - Titt�) 1101 Victoria Curve • 1V�iendota Heights,lViN • 551f$ 452 • 1854 a �� , . .� � - � : C i�y o� .•.j l� 1��ie�dota %Iei�h�s SIGNA,TDRES OF CONSENT FOR VAI22ANC8 REQLTEST • TO: The Planning eammission, City o£ l�endota Heights FROM: Property Owners of _,�.�� y1 �E't S 5 t�- { I c6�i �n Va t t...Q. C u r-�e �: a.� c c�.vt c�2. S��-�� (�.�.� i--�� ff w� ti.-, r� �� . �-- � {. We e undersi9� ed have reviewed the • plans fbr .� ��o5rc..� - S +r� 5 i�-e.� ' . : . �and ��vnderstand the tez�is .�nd conditi of the requested� variance 'for ��{-��u G�-z,� {x, •(r� __C_ { a S-e. � � �Zi �z f i o f I t v�2. ��('1r�a v► p r-� v, c. � a C� t^Fu-v r.�v +rc . we nave no op�ections to �s request a�c� do �e written consent and cansent , to � waiver of � public Sincerely, NAME (Please Print} � (�Z{�G�... �'M. L1 � , D a�► A�;h �- 5#�A ,r�r. t�.7yU hJ '��(�IA��I �i 1�on��,J� �o��.t� - ��!`� �J �� rp,('.� LYn� '"��A�rJt�C,� �f2t��i ��c.�,.ln� Ger' . � S !-� �rh �9-N� ,� �n.�,,tL. 4 Ps�J ��C,�r �.�� t� �- SIGNATITI2E ve� our �t'. ADDRESS (INCL. LOT) "?-75 1� i�.i. j� f c-7' � � l� �; � t.�.rt"o P G?_ �lp�7 � �A'�'�l �li�..v� r� � �'S�Z {i �c�., ,�,1 C,�,,c,t1F" �y.�'� `��p� 24� � K 8� Taa oa 2ac� - (%t�� Lboo 20. _ liQl Victoria Curve =�Viendata Heights, .xV'f►N - 55118 � 452-18�0 f • t/s� i z if f I ' ' r t � ' ��. t. A _ . � � .. � �- � �� ;- � � . � � i�'r,' t ' f � ' '�; l � dl �.f � . �s,, � � _...�. ._ . . .4 9F ,,�1 , �.v .. � � _.. r ~� . � , � ' ` �� e�_..' .. . � I � � J % ,� i + ' . I " � '" 1 ' ` t� �` r , ; � � ��.f, . �._ ` -� � � � �/� � . � --- ; ` � � 0 �...- f�-- � �f c , � �r i. ._ _ .{ .. � ._ .� � � � ! i ; � � ifi i� •, • ' j ji i _ ...,_-- ; t /�r , i i . , � � _ ,�. � . , �'/I`1 f I ' • � i f� F� _ ..��---� '-i �! �_.....l.._ ; ��'`- {;'' � ' � 1 � - �- -� _ � . ; � � , t ---; - x . : a � � ` �. I ' %�' �-- � � , ! f` i.;.�"1 ' � i ' �� P,� : � _ < < ''� _ �.. _ � � � } � .�._ . � �r, � ` �1 f ' rl / � . '`. j/ �J . � �.�. . . . ..._ �� r�� _ . . _ � . . : � .. . �'��'� . . � . '� . �P�7 �..�.il�d o�r� . �� .. ¢ �, • �� . _..._ _ � ..r ' .�. ...+ �.. �� .r I.�.. �. � �,+.� f..� �.. i� �. . . "�� .�.. ....� �..- ti� +.�+ �....i .�.. r .,� w.�+ �... ..�. +...� . _ �. . ... . : . { �Y,iYsf'^�i��.r+.Y+�Nr�pLilk � , _ .I `:.7J. .Y :.... . .. .:.. . �. ��,,,��.,��. — t �.v .��. ...... � u�...e'crn,._.�........,,._ .'_ _'. .. _. ._ ��...rrl�aFwS�M!!!e �r..0 ' l . � � � .:`R � � � �• ... . .. . . ._; � '"v3�ss31N1 : .. w . � U . . . i """""�.�.�.�...�i. ' ` �: � # . . . . � � ct ' �� ' � ��s��d�d , -.,,..,�. �t � � . , .. � '� ,�F(" --y� �,.-- N �3s��... 4n�1Fi�_ . . , r ,x °�l�l� �, 3� ,1`r/d j,��1 � �¢� .. � ..... _... � .... _. ._ ....... _ 31'`'7 hsL��dO�ld ..... ... �. �.�` ..��;�`��n,,`�-` �;�,�� .� � �_ :�.�" .- .� ^ - a � }"�'.J.�.F'�;.�.¢�� .�.�. � � �.... �a�.. .� �.. �� w... ,� �{�Qi ' . �'' ,' �,�b�' . . . ' . � . r . y�'�,: • � �r' .� k �;. . . "J' x - 4{�� „ t � � � s. � .k]�Y .. i'3' £'}�T� ' y .� �. +- �Ac» � �. °� �y '� + o ;'.p.i+y .'�+�t�/ 'n rl`� fJ � . .. = r � � y . .: . �� 4 m i Y.,v' ,�py• . LI'i� `Jf 4 "2�$f� �:�Y ' ` � ' , . ?�.. q h • .� %3- i � '� YYb o..{' ., . ��i� � � F'Ty� d .� �� , <r �, �vyy�h.i , . y .. , ,,,� 4 ��y��' k�l,a �yi�tr � � . r r . ''[[JJyy �5 � \ � a .'I� (i itl "_ ., .. .y iw�l�� r� ''`1 t� �� 1 � ` ��}' - � � �`� � �h-�� c e gY ;e �' . ^:c. - � - �'�± z ,µ{ �� a�. :� ', �� '�^ft� ° ''' • �.„ , r� �Y�� .e d ;I . . .: - �� k �� { i � � ''� i `.; r+,�'i'a'" � � `t'J <,��14p� % .,� h . rf i � f'F�` -r ,'� /"6 t° _,'. �c ��:&y�i � ;J' . • . :""t.�� 'r y:... . ... � : f r � �' f c.!` . :,� '�: `-, • „ � . . ; , . 4 � � ;.. . . , � .,, i " ' r ' ° , � �'�, � . --�s, . � •. .. . , ., � �� + � ��. ., '� / �� v , . _ , . , .� , .,. � �. ... � , . .: . � s" . �.p7 '=(:, . .. �.�4A . 5�a'ri , . " . . . ;; '� y ... ��t. . . .�;�= :.a , . �� f ' , ... . , . y_�,: � "s: . � � � �� , . � - � �'� ��w. � .. .. . . . . � � . ''� '�f&'t��"'",n .. . ��:�" :*,�y�R""' J, .. , .. � - ' ' :-. '1 .._ .. . .. . r .i. - �K�� ' `j'w ..�*"'.r�e,— =...'�..��" � � •�� .�� .4h �4 rr � -+auv,•.``�`r'�'�.urc.s�� "'�L�""d'T?"+�,,.�Ef-�.��, � . . ' !�i, �" -��-.; �,�„---..�...; �.. �. zm�,"�s��"'"`!°`°'e.�."+sie.rs"�e.-""'�+.��'"�.'�,�i'S9'.Ea� ' " ,,t„p�rG l�"f� - r '4. , k.. "".�-••.�er^� -. �n'� _ ...r�.rr„----_....,_,.. ..� '" . ` .. �a�+:!t...-@T4.�b.�.�Y"`_.. _ '� �c�'.-».......e�•.�.._._i�°"_ �..�s- �-"�eu'-"�a'n." +as�y"' .r""""'.--,--�'`'�'�►f�'�r.�._-' ' � ". A`�t • i;, � } - �b,. . � M �:: �, :x�'r.. v;'!^ : _'S�?,�k_ " ' , .-K: e , 4 s Y'� �• .•�F v:� :ly� t_ ��.4�',t ��:. 4�' � 3�� : { �'�? ��' `{.! rn .� � _�.,ri .��•.'t{ i . 3 �` � � � �t. i�, �� t !� S�� j`r 7 1 . i � '{ 1'M � Y r t ` �` ,�: �' ;: - ri F i � � � 1t�T O� � � .•., , � 1��iendo�a Hei�,h�s August 2I, 1992 Mr. Glenn Wiessner 1876 valle�r Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55�.18 Dear Mr. Wiessner: Your application for a variance will be considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesdav, Auqv.st 25, 19g2. The Planning Commissiorx meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City� Hall in the Coun.cil Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on att�ending the meeting, in order that your applicatzon will .. receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerel.y, Revin Batchelder Acimi.nistrative Assistan.t .. ..... RLB:kkb � a 1141 Vietaria Curve •1Viex�dota Heights,lUlN • 55118 =� ��. 452*1850 ��- . : � C ity o� .�., . 1Viendota Heights August 27, 1992 Mr. Glen Wiessner 1876 Valley Curve Mendota Heights, NIl� 55118 Dear Mr. Wiessner: Your application for a Variaace will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesdav, September 1, 1992. The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clocl� P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting in order that your application will receive Council consideration . The Plaaaiag Commission voted 6-0 to recommead that the City Couacil approve the a front yard setback variaace to allow a storage shed , to encroach 21 1/2 feet iato the legal front yard with the - coaditioa that the applicant provide a landscaping screea. If you have an.y questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ��n Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant RI,B : kkb Enclosures � m 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Vlendota Heights,� 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 -- CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO T0: Mayor, City Council and City August 27, 1992 Administ FROM: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Ass's SUBJECT: CASE N0. 92-27: Rabin - Variance DISCIIS5ION Mr. Dean Ra.bin, 1928 Crown Point Drive, appeared before the Planning Commission to request a side yard setback variance of five feet (5') in order to construct a large garage addition (Section 4.6(3)d). See attached Planner's Report and Application. The Planning Commission, upon reviewing the request, felt that there was ample space for a three car garage addition without encroaching into the side yard. The Planning Commission felt there was no exhibited hardship or•practical difficulty and that the proposed garage would be out of scale with the existing home and the neighborhood. RECONIl�2ENDATION The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to waive the public hearing. The Planning Commission voted 6-D to recommend that City Council deny the requested Side Yard Setback Variance for a garage addition. ACTION RBQIIIRED Meet with the applicant. If the City Council desires to implement the Planning Commission's recommendation of denial, they should pass a motion to deny the requested variance based on a lack of demonstrated hardship or practical difficulty. KLB:kkb � PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: Background INCORI'Cl12ATfil) CONSULTING PLANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITEC�'S 300 FIRST AVLNUE IJORTH SUITE 210 MINNEAPOLIS, MN ,55�3(ll 612•339 3300 25 August 1992 92-27 Dean Rabin 1928 Crown Point Drive Vaziance to side yard setback Tim Malloy C. 7ohn Uban The Applicant wishes to construct an addition to his existing gazage. The proposed garage addition would encroach on the required 10-foot side yard by 5 feet (see Section 4.6(3}d of the Zoning Ordinance). The Applicant has indicated that the purpose of the gazage addition is for storing a third vehicle. No elevation drawings have been submitted to show how the propose� addition will be integrated with the existing gazage or what exterior materials will be use�.. The site plan also does not show the relationship between the proposed garage addition and the house on the adjacent lot. Variance Criteria The criteria for a variance requires that there be a practical difficulty with respect to the size shape or other chazacteristics of the properry that would prevent the owner from making reasonable use of the property if the regulations in the Zoning Ordinance aze strictly applied. The first step in considering whether this variance request should be granted is to determine whether a three-stall garage constitutes reasonable use of the property. A two-stall gazage is commonly accepted as essen6al in suburban areas. In fact, the Mendota Heights Zoning Ordinance requires two-stall garages for new homes (see Section 4.18(4)). In this case, a third gazage stall could be said to be a reasonable use if three-stall gazages aze commonly found on other, similar properties in the surrounding neighborhood. In all, seven of the 341ots in the Crown Point neighborhood have three-stall garages. •M � � Dean Rabin, Case No. 92-27 25 August 1992 Page 2 The difference between the other three-stall garages in the neighborhood and the proposed gazage is that most, if not all, of the existing three-stall gazages meet the minimum setback requirements. Clearly, there is no problem with a three-stall garage when it can be accommodated within the regulations of the Ordinance. The preferred solution would be to locate the gazage addition in a way that does not require a variance. Since the additional stall is to be used to store a collectable vehicle, we examined with the applicant the possibiliry of attaching the proposed garage addition behind the existing gazage, thereby, avoiding a variance. This was based on the rationale that the collectable vehicle would not be taken in and out as often as the average family vehicle. It was determined that this would not work since there is a bedroom window in the area where the extended garage would be located. Without this window the bedroom would most likely not meet building code requirements. One other option would be to make the garage addition narrower. Cunendy the garage addition is proposed to be 18 feet wide. Eighteen feet is the width of two parking stalls, which creates a size capable of storing two collectable vehicles. Added to the existing 24foot width gazage, the overall width is 42 feet wide, which is enough for four cars. Clearly, this is not in character with the . neighborhood. Three-caz garages on new homes are typically 32 feet to 34 feet wide. The proposed garage would be wider than the existing home. Narrowing the garage by 5 feet would eliminate the need for a variance and still be larger than a typical three-car garage. If the Planning Commission determines that � three-stall garage, of the dimensions shown on the site plan, is a feature that can reasonably be expected by the average property owner in this neighhorhood, then the impact of the propose� gazage addition on the adjacent properties and the sunounding area must be considered. The gazage addition would be very visible from the adjacent residential street since the properry is at the intersection of Crown Court and Crown Point Drive. The general character of this azea is open with large front yaz�s and ample side yazds. The proposed garage addition will appear to crowd the adjacent hor�e to the west. However, the home on this property is set back further than the house and garage on the subject property. In addition, the gazage on the adjacent hous�e is located on the same side as the gazage on the subject property. lfierefore, views from the adjacent home would not be affected. There is also a row of small Aspen trees between the subject property and the lot to the west. These trees provide some separation between the two lots and should not be affected by the garage addition. There are relatively few homes that would have a view of the proposed gazage since the property is on a cul-de-sac and the rear yard abuts the right-0f-way for I-35E... The adjacent property owners have signed the Applicant's consent form indicating that they have reviewed the applicant's plans and have no objection W the requested variance. Action Review the Applicant's materials consider waiving the public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the requested variance. • �-.� �,�,� �;�� • �• ��:r. - � .: .. . � � � � � � j � �� -� s �- -� � �� . � �. -� ••'• ' • • • • . .I . . .I . — MARIE 1 » � � . . � � _ � � u � � c�`.� !� f�i � � . . . _ � � - (!� �" + v .s � � AY � i' _ r - _ � � _ . • � � � : � • P2� � ^ .. �`._ . _ � �� - , � . • • • l • -� / . .. �t S'�' I � 101 • • •• � • � • • • . • • • • 1_�%1 �. , _ �. , c � � � �. � MYII � C111C1[ � � ' S • ? • ��M��E � • �+ '• + • , • � � � . � • � • • • 1 W� •2Y � ' i w '' 1 • • � '' • • • : • � � • W � '' -� � � � �� u �\ •� • ✓ �� • � II �� • • � � � � . i • . . . L= � � :� � , . . . � � a ' � :.� .. �.. � p . ' � � y' �w �' i \w � • � • • • • � • � � /`. i� • • • • � • _ • • � ` � • � e. . O w • u • ' • y� • ' y - � � r. � • i' — _ • . ;- � . . . .. . � . =-- - w _ • • . • . � . • raMooT� Ei�►�[r. • � • • S . � - -- - � w `� �y. ' � � � • scwa �.urrc� • uu • . • I . . � • �� o .. • 'r � � • • w • • � -` • � � ' � • � SUBJECT PROPERTY � � � �� , � __ � , �• � • . , � \ ,• , � . .. , . . � • ,. -� ._ a.:,__ . . :� -- � �y ��:�` • ' ' . - NORTH � �'`��' �. • �• _' ' . . . � t ,o' �-- — -- ' '� SCALE y"=800' ��;, ,• .� _. • • . , �� , � . c`�s�l � ' ' � '' ' � ' " • '' ' - � � � • rfi►u �� • • T/M�WW� / � / • • Rj� � . • ,1 � � / 4 � L � � V �� ` � I v � — • . ; �► \ � 7" G�:.��'� �� _� � Q� c-- -- � � S A E ' H 1 G W A Y ; � � � , � • ' � M � . . , ,. ' _ _' . I I , � ��ys+` I ' M� • E, E • /� �� MENDAKOTA GO�F COURSE 9 C�i NTRY CLUB ' ,' �' I ' . • _ I �/ � (PRIVATE) ,d � . . � '' • � • • _l _ � I' � 1 PI 11E NT pIV • � . ' • �� ' • - \\ ' � ��m- ii� • � 11 - ==5` i . , _ � � ' � � �- �--�-- O ' - �� = _ _ _ .-. � . � . ,-. _ . . O ' ' � � =— `' =1.� � f/ � �. � �{ ' - ' � • � .1+. w Ol �/ /I ' _ ' 1 � . . t ( � _ n�. • ,j/' __ �_ _ .- • iy .. ' Q `�.) - f�! _ _ - ' • 1 i . J• :__ � _ _ � .[ t . � . ,�,; �_ _r , - , al G N � • - ; /.. � .-�__ -_ . �• � PPpK � n ?. . "= V :� � - _ - • .�o■r.cM } � li -_-- � srarcz ro.re• � y. "r "'_ • "� • �... -" - - _ � sw•sr�rwu _ � � •' _ ' . � � �. - _ _- � � -''xx � # - • ---- � _ . �� -� . • •� � � � � j w.-• —_ — - — �. `i ;'' ; _�! _ _�- r / , - - � -•- .. � � . . _ � . _. / '\ � _ =- -WAGON-- WHEEL- .} _ • '! -- - --- ��-_ -' � � � _ �• . • � -- _ � � . . —- .�. ,. . .:. . •LJ � • � ,� : . _ R a"s � . . . . . . • •�. , . : . . � 1 � � � . _- - - I / � � r . .� !_ "_ -__-_ -__ � a �� I _ i �y,y =_: " = - . • . . • . . . .�. . . . •'• � - - - - - /� � �� ` � �' __-=-_ -_ =__— = - ' , � - j'I _ _ __ _ . _--- -- .'. . . . . . . . . . ..�.i . .� J �� - — — -- - •� . . . . . . . . . � �\ /� f� f � i ' _ _ __ • •• _ U 1 N V • � � ! � � " • ' • • . • / ' ` W n� i , - _— _ �5 et�,'� �� . . . �� I � �_ — ••_ _ _ . I z !''� ,_ - _ - G Q � �Y - , � • • • � . � 7 I .r � . • � I -J �� = = — _ __ ___ - . . ,. � 1 � — — —_ - ' .�. ', /� Y / / • � II ! l� �! ii =- - — — _-{'•- _-�--_� r ''� W /1 � ' I - - � , • �� r � ti : _' J t' � _ Q __� : , LOT 1 '" 3 8 � 3 P� z C�UVM�� \ TNE RIOGE �UTN , CONOON�INWM p`P�•��eb,� ,iS�', h � a �a �ti ..8o•s�iz'i�: yd 'Q0� �z// '- LOT 1 � 0 � ' 6'l' .hb�Oa . i 3 �� : ,y�' 1 o/�9 , a \ ef'I,I ` � L � � � � � I! V� o � u l N ,� I I, I ` �Q �I� �' � �'�� I ; ,L`.• G 190.00 300.28 62 OJ � 1' � --N89a3S'S E 56419-- --� O \,,�� p1 � 1 � �0'L A Ow � Z � � vy • O �� 2� a,�o i � 7 I� 0 18 ;/ ' o � N �`a 4 in _�. _ �. . � � 1 .; `C� ,Z6 �y � 16 a /p� 19 I � y n � r. 5 i1r • t 6' `' 9�. 15 0e 7PI9N�3'Pe : I Y I y' ye � � � �s ''� �.' GZ � . / r � \ J a / ,'b ♦ •.j 4 OOOp � /�6 0' Z O~ e� ;• i 2 , , � q � ,� o� o ��- �•. 3 0�. o° y Q��r1 R`�.s2 �. �g`�� ze. � i 6�cA' 4.� 4 ��' o m�T�. `�g . c. � , \ � �' s �; '! � 49 � P� � ; r" � •r 2 0 - t • �•o0 13 J ��o � a � N 6w� '!'9 � _d� 9�J � `' e °n Q -�N ! ' 9 �V' l� � A • L j��y iBs?• A`�C' � `t�" , �� N��,��j, ' �_ � �iy ^°� ^ . .C`°e ' �''•"•:'�"�. '°�`� SUBJECT PROPERTY �' �,�� 5 Zze:;as "—� =� ' ; � � y?. .*r � � ` �c i 4r p* ee��;:::fc.:�'� 0 21 `� j i T � � 1 ' N� -' 1; C11•c '''k' e::�`i:3 •ieeie:..::• or ' +� � v '"^ , ,..::.��:::::;::::::.�. �� NORTH � �p^ ' � • ' ' �. H. T9• • - I / • � ' 'J6?e-'w A 9....:::�;�::�::. 6 g' � SCALE 1"-200' q,°� b 6'9?3ie �$! Si5^ 'y � 2BZ.2. • � / C 1 �g' 'E•• 6 '4`:. oo — � ; / ,` `Y p ...5�° � .E• t�b° t 'ob ,r?'�. ' �: ada '. 2Z � i � 080-0 3 /9t_� m� � � � ��eoV�oa e : e�.00 . ea�s � 'L:. • - ` s , . i ��d�P tE�M ¢ GE��GOp N 9'� 1�9�� '�� i. �t5 8q33 , R+�37,• , 8.� l. �^ct' 9 �7 a' t �jv+ ' c: '381 �1 �5=3� � . ��, gd' Q;f'�O� "s�3i02't R:7ssg2 - `�� 23 8 3 � � �B' R, 55 d! : 7ay ~N a+ r' � ' '1 �-03 a � `�6 J,•• 'iu1�P6Y1 � � S.BP2YI��w - t +�c J oa 9 }/ K� 3 Q 7 b iO ��da" �' � o�¢ 15722 1a94�:. ; ; + � � m � f m a 6 a'to � a o� ar � 2'��. 31 �� /�O =? N�v e �o lV� �°'^ 5 � f 4 �$ Qj�eay�3�' �r �� a�,.? � � � �„ -i�� ! �¢/4t i-- '� -- S8�' Yw i 95.40' -. z �� 4�ya N A� 24 �„ 25 w,�oe ._ . 129.79 �40.00 95.00 lS.00 00 t3500 K� �� b-,�}'i' 2` z6 �.o I _ � Q��r J I , - . � 00� N!A9aS307f �ryA �- '�b76�7 �1�16 J�"o � ' � � p �A 3 �` se�4•sr �� 8�'z:r i � i040-03 Q �e� ��is ei'e Z� e�a's w C�a� o An� f � � I � ��a 9s s :o�e� c:3oo'° a Z� g �� /'�S ;� . Oo�a/`d v�d l3cn� vi�v o 8; Z o8 a� a�3 � � �� ' Si• � ` L. �.S.G�/"007�I�/ V � gi ioo ; 29 3c` r i i{. . I,. ' �� :, 6 �9e. � o v� N e��src o ''� .� sa�^as�:w. • 5..� Ac. �. H BP25�2� I : t �8 93 = a' 1� - N � 0 3 0 ��o oz ^a � o ,, � M? , �: p o= o.�n;V OI�- s-ibo�4 -6 T \ �iO�s '\Q o, m � " 29 0-t" � av _ V - _ b � 5.8ti25�2S�h. �?27 .' � S 9 2j2j'W. 2a2 90. "' 9 \ IZy" :' -•149.5p•--_ , 60 169.65 _ _ _ _ � �or � oiz-o4 S � \ sa9'ss'zrw. �.a, �` �s.�a s : •'sa•3r�: I GF Ml Pf • � � . � � L6064-D . rv, l'%A c• , JI/IEtYDOTA QOAD S• T. H., N� // O -- -- -- -- -- � --I r r i , . � I � � I i � ,'�_ • 3e 'k=` � . . � ��?' • - _ .. _ . .. I . � �r • . � .. . • - ::S i I . � � � I ; TRnN�M•is'sic .. - . � � - I�g`" AERIAL . . - � � . August 11, 1992 The City of Mendota Heights Dean Rabin 1928 Crown Point Drive Mendota Heights MN 55118 Dear City of Mendota Heights I hearby request a varience of the side lot setback requirement. I would like to add a third garage stall to my home located at the above address. The third stall is needed in order for me to store my third car inside. I cannot go to the rear because I would lose the use of a bedroom. The house on the south side of mine is setback much farther than mine. That house is quite a ways from the lot line so I would still be a long distance from it. There are a number of homes in the same area that now have three car garages, so my addition would conform well with the neighborhood. The infringment on the ten foot setback would only be two feet at the front of the addition. Thank you for your consideration. . .�.. Sincerely �/��"l � Dean Rabin . ...., � � 1�3T Cf►� ,,., . 1��endota H+�ights �- APPLICATIUN FOQ CONSIDERATION PLANNING REQUEST Case No, �2�27 Date of A �Iication �`t t-�t Fe� Paid P�`3C�.(�'�—� �$,��— ApplicantNazne: �abin Dean Px. 45G-2293 (I.ast) (First) (MT� Address: t�wuer Name: Address: 1928 Crawn Foin.t Dri.ve (Nuznber & Street) As Above (Last) (Numbex 8c Street) Mendota Heights MN 55118 (City) (State) (Zip) {First} (City) 3� (State) {Zip) StreetLacadon of Properiy in Questian: ��28 Crown Point Drive Legal Descrigtion of Property: Type of Request: Rezoniug Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Fermit for P.U.D. - �- Plan Appmval Gamprehensive Pian Amendment Applicable Ciry Ordinance Number Present Zaning of Property Present Use Proposed Zoning of Progerty Progased Use X Vaziance Subdivisian Approval RTet�auds Fermit Qther (attach explanation) Section I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on ihe addidonal material are true. (Signature of Applicant) s. - ''t, �� M► :. �,. � \ � 1 � -� . 1101 Victaria Curve • 1Viendata Heights, 1V iN w 5�118 452 • 1850 � � � C ity a� .,►.� ,,,� 1�iie�dota �-Ieights SIGNATIIRES OF CONBENT FOR V1�R,IANCE REOIIESZ' TO: The Planning Commission, City of Mandota Hei.ghts FROM: Property Owners of Y•�; �� :% RE : . ; , ,! _.� , • _ � • .. . • ' ' _ , ' , , -, . . � . �'. We .the undersigned have reviewed the• plans for -- � f-' ':` '• r'%� : and•utiderstand the terms and conditions of the requested varianae �for --- � .= �� ;"• '..1:�j" � " ; % . ; � we nave no o.n� ections to tnZs request ana ao .tie written aonsent and consent.to waiver of public Szncerely, NAME (Please Print ( �e��r'� hi ,�- S v�. �G.VI <'_ L..1 C�'� t • • r l � -n" r� ' t (' . ' : 1 !� , t / �. ' + ' � � �� i f � f'{ t• . ��SL'.�.:r.) <..(�„ !�' j 1�-r.1 C.�. {� �� I. r� t" � � � . � :.� �.,� �J� C � � I - ; ....) �Z� la � ��.�.:_ �ny give our - zearing. � AUDRESS (INCL. IAT} .. � r� . • f • i�l l � ' i! . .. � _ � . � ,.� • t.; •- . . • , i. �? :� i ) � . . l�% - G �v-�a,� E': . -Z r='' _ ,:� c .� :�� al � ." - � �f 1181 Vietoria Curve •1Viendota. Heights, .1ViN • 55118 452-1854 � 4 O ,w � + • 1� � �Yty O� ,,�,1 , 1��iendota ��eights Au.gust 21, 1992 Mr. Dean Rabin 1928 Crown Point Drive Mendota xeights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Rabin: Your application �or a Variaaee wa.11 be considered�by the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which wil]. be held on Tueaday, August 25,,199Z. The Planning Commis�ion meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hal1 in the Council Chambers. You, or a repre�entative shauld plan on attending the meeting, in order that your appl3cation wil.l receive Commission consideratian. If you have any guestions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Revin Batchelder Administrative Assistant : � RLB:kkb 6 � 1101 Victvria Curve •1Viendota:Heights, ,1V�N �.v5118 °�� ==:452•18v4 :� City o� .�.. . 1Viendota Heights August 27, 1992 Mr. Dean Rabin 1928 Crown Point Mendota Heights, NIl�T 55118 Dear Mr. Rabin: Your application for a Variance will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, September 1, 1992. The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting in order that your application will receive Council consideration . The Planaiag Commission voted 6-0 to recommend that the City Couacil deay' the requested Side Yard Setback Variance for a garage additioa. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, CC,�=� Revin Batchelder Administrative Assistant RI,B : kkb Enclosures � 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights;lViN • 55118 452 • 1850 � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 'iui�iu�i7 August 28, 1992 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ a SUBJECT: Air Noise Community Update � INTRODIICTION As discussed at the last Council meeting, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) has undertaken steps to implement as permanent the revised aircraft flight departure corridor as tested from August 12, 1991 to October 12, 1991. Council has taken a position in opposition to this Proposal, and the intent of this memo is to update you on recent events related to this issue. BACRGROUND Currently the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) utilizes a 28 degree cone of air space in which to direct departing aircraft over Mendota Heights and Eagan during peak departure periods. This corridor is bounded by the bearings of 090 degrees on the north and 118 degrees on the south. Mendota Heights has long argued that these corridor boundaries are inequitable in that they cause a disproportionate share of aircraft noise over Mendota Heights. More specifically, aircraft are prohibited from turning south of the runway center line while aircraft are r.equired to turn as much as 28 degrees north of runway center line, thereby inequitably distributing air traffic over long established Mendota Heights residential areas. The Mendota Heights Fanned Corridor Proposal which was developed in 1989 recommends a more equitable corridor arrangement bounded by bearings of 090 degrees on the north and 150 degrees on the south. This Proposal allows for approximately 30 degrees of air space on either side of runway center line, allowing for a greater dispersal of departing aircraft and a reduction in the repeated overflights experienced by many City residents. The procedure which was tested by the MAC concentrated the departing aircraft within a 15 degree space, from 100 degrees on the north to 115 degrees o� It is this latter procedure that the MAC wishes to implement during peak departure periods. last fall cone of air . the south. permanently The results of this test procedure were presented to Council by Mr. Bob Collette on June 2, 1992. The results revealed that aircraft were physically unable to operate within the concentrated corridor, and the procedure failed to deliver meaningful noise relief. In addition, resident noise complaints during the test were substantially higher than the same time period the year preceding. More specifically, in 1991 noise complaints from Mendota Heights totaled 512 for the 60 day period (August 12th to October 12th), whereas in 1990 the City logged 271 complaints during the same 60 day period. It should be noted that not all City residents are opposed to the MAC's Revised Corridor Procedure. Mr. Joe Meagher was present at a recent Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council MASAC meeting and clearly is in favor of any procedure which restricts aircraft further south of Highway 110. Mr. Meagher also expressed concern regarding building conatruction underway in southern Mendota Heights in areas subject to air noise exposure. Mr. Meagher intends to be present at our September lst meeting to address the Council. As discussed at the last Council meeting, the process the MAC intends to follow in implementing this revised procedure is as follows: � 1. Provide Update to the MASAC 2. Consideration by MAC Planning Environment Committee 3. Consideration by full MAC 4. Consideration by FAA/Preparation of Environmental Review Document DISCiTSSION August 25 September S September 21 Variable - 45 days to 18 months Based on the adopted position of the Council, the attached letter addressed to Mr. Jeff Hamiel, Executive Director of the MAC, was prepared and sent on behalf of the City. Additionally, the City's position was formally presented at the August 25th MASAC meeting. The MAC staff did not ask MASAC to formally make a recommendation on the Revised Corridor Procedure, so the issue will come before the MAC Planning and Fnvironment (P and F�) Committee on September Sth based solely on a recommendation from the MAC staff. The City should strongly consider an appearance at the P and E meeting to again oppose the adoption of this procedure. Because the P and £ Committee is essentially a subcommittee of the full MAC, the recommendation of the P and E Committee is very important. To lend additional gravity to our concern, it might prove helpful if Councilmembers could also attend this meeting. Please check your calendars for Tuesday, September 8th beginning at 1:00 P.M., and let me know at the Council meeting if you will be able to attend. - � 'RECCIN�+2EN'llAT�dN I recommend that Council adopt the at�ached Resal,ution which formally affirms the City's oppo�itian to the revised corridor procedure. In addition, I sugges�. that this material be sent in advance to each of the eight members of the P and E Committee. Las�ly, I encourage Councilmembers to attend the P and E meeting on September 8th in support the City'� adopted pasition. ACTTON RE4UZRED Cauncil should cansider adoption of Resoiution Na. 92- , A RESOLIITZON OPPOSING T8L ZMPI,EMENTATTON QF A REVISED AIRCRAFT DEPARTi7R13 CORRIDOR BY THS S�TROPflLITAN ASRPORTS CQMMISS20N, and direct �taf� to forward a copy to each member of the MAC Planning and Environment Commit�ee. In addition, Councilmembers should indicate whether or no� they will be able to attend the P and E mee�.ing scheduled for September 8, 1992. MTL;kkb �i�y o� ... � . 1��ienc�o�a Heights August 25, 1992 Mr, Jei'f Hamiel Metropolitan A;irports Commissian 604Q 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450 . Dear Mr. Hamiel: � As you know, the City o� Mendota Heights is a member oE the Eagan-Menclota Heights Corridor Task Force which was farmed by the MAC in March 1990 �o address aircraft departure concerns wa,thin the two communities. At �he last.�Task Force meeting held Augu�t 6, 1992 i� was�announced by Mr. Dick Keinz that the MAC wi11 begin steps ta permanently�implement the concentrated 15 degree corridor procedure which was tested last fall. Thia letter is to formally notify you that the City of Mendota Heights is opposed to this recommendation. Furthermore, we reque�t that no action be taken by the MAC towards implementing this procedure.�•� • • The reasons for the City's opposition to the constricted corridor procedure are numerous and signiEicant. flur concern� are as iollows: . 1. The�procedure failed tQ del.iver the noise relief envisioned bv the MAC and the City of Mendota Heighta. A� a meeting af the Corridor Task Force held January 30, S99]. you discussed with the Task Force parameters of the departure procedure proposed for testing. At that time you indicated �our desire �o contain departures no farther north than the a�hle�ic fields a� St, Thomas Academy located on the corn.er of Mendota Heights Road and Lake Drive, This procedure wauld bypass nearly a11 residential areas within Mendata Heights. As the test results issued by your office on March 4, 1992 clearly indicate, aircra�t were significantly further north than St. Thomas Academy, and the expected noise relief never materialized. � 1101 Victaria =.Curve • 1Viendota Heights; ��1ViN_� �55118 � � � = r452 ��1850 =-� �'_� r� Mr. Je�f Hamiel August 25, 1992 Page 2 2. � The Iimited flight coraridor proved physically inadequate and unworkable. The test results provided by the MAC clearly indicate aircraft too numerous to caunt significantly overran the defined corridor boundaries. To adopt a revised corridor procedure based on test resul�s which indicate this degree of non- compliance is fool.hardy a� best. The candensed corridor resulted in an increase in noise and aircraft overf].ight in a sicrn.ificant portion of the City Despite the aptimis�ic projections, the tested corridor procedure actually served to worsen averflights-and noise pollution within portions of Mendota Heights. The procedure resulted in a greater concentration o� flights over marxy long established neighborhoods, and aircraft noise cornplaint� increased significant].y as a result. Based on data compiled by the MAC, naise complaints received from Mendota iieights reaidents during the �est were up 89 percent compared to the same time period in 1990. 7'h.e intensification of�departure traffic over our cammunity was not.. con�ained within the City's industrial/business . park area ;as...intended, .� As . a result;`;; manyr �3 , re�idential properties were inordi�ately impacted by the condensed flow of air tra�fic. � The City of Mendota Heights supparted the concept o� the 6p day tes� in hopes of diminiehing the repea�ed aircraft overflights experienced by our residents. The 3.ntent of the tes� was ta generate empirical data upon which a reasonable decision could be made regarding the merits of the �ested procedure. Clearly the test failed to achieve its intended obj ectives and �herefore should be rejected. Prior to any further conaideration of the limited corridor procedure by the Me�ropalitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Gouncil, the MAC Planning and Fnvironment Cammittee, ar the full MAC, we reques� a meeting with you and your staff to further discu�s our concerns. � ♦` ` - , , '. ' ` , .. .y, ,:� . -;r�`}Y�4 ., � � . :>�� .x .;,... , .� t� .. _ � . ' ^ � ...v. , ' � a . . _ . . .e ::'ii�'�� :h. � i,,:�a(,�L:`:• r � Mr. Jeff Hamiel August 25, 1992 Page 3 Please con�act me at your convenience to schedule a mutual.ly agreeabl.e date and time. CEM:kkb � S incerely�, CITY OF MENDOTA HETGHT� C'�.�.�. �. u,.�K��..� Charies.E. Mertensotto Mayor � � , n '�' _. , ., �_ . a CITY OF b�;I�TDOTA H$IGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, biINNF;SOTA RESOLIITION N0. 92- A RESOLIITION OPPOSING THFs IMPLII�NTATION OF A REVISED AIRCRAFT DLPARTORE CORRIDOR BY THE b�TROPOLITAN AIRPORTS CONIl2ISSION DOHEREAS, current aircraft departure procedures utilized by the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Federal Aviation Administration to route aircraft to the southeast of Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport are inequitable; and �PSEREAS, for the past 2 1/2 years the City of Mendota Heights has participated in the MAC' s Blue Ribbon Corridor Task Force in an attempt to address an unbearable air noise situation within our community; and �1HEREAS, the MAC and FAA conducted a 60 day test of a Revised Corridor Procedure from August 12, 1991 to October 12, 1991; and �SEREAS, the parameters of the test were to route aircraft departures within Mendota Heights so as to avoid long established residential areas; and WHEREAS, the MAC has compiled a report dated March 4, 1992 summarizing the results of the test period; and 4PHEREAS, the report clearly shows that the tested procedure failed to achieve its intended objectives. NO� THLRLFORE BL IT RBSOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, that the City formally opposes the implementation of the Revised Corridor Procedure for the following reasons: 1. The Procedure failed to deliver the noise relief envisioned by the MAC and the City of Mendota Heights. 2. The limited flight corridor proved physically inadequate and unworkable. 3. The condensed corridor resulted in an increase in noise and aircraft overflight in a significant portion of the City. BS �T FURTBER RSSOLVED that the City Council requests tha� the MAC take no action towards implementing this revised procedure. Adopted by �he City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this Is� day of September, 1992 � ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA �IEIGHTS Charles E. Merten�otto Mayor 6 �4 , MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS August 25, 1992 TO: Mayor, Council City Administrat FROM: Klayton H. Eckles ��k�/ SUBJECT: Examination of Thru-street O�tion for the Arndt Plat. Improvement 92-1 Pro�ect 9208 DISCIISSION At the August 18 Council meeting the Arndt Feasibility report was presented to Council�. The action taken was to table the discussion and direct staff to study the cost of the thru- street option. Council also indicated that the developer should perform the site grading, therefore my cost calculations presented in this memo ignore all grading costs. For the thru street option the cost to construct the new utilities would be $119,800, which is more than the culdesac option. The hook up charges would be less-- only $6,660 compared to $13,381 for the culdesac option. One difficulty that arises with the thru-street option is the issue of the park contribution. With this option the developer would lose one lot in order to meet the land dedication requirement set by the Council. The loss of one lot would increase the per lot assessment. 'I'he onl other alternative would be to allow a cash dedication of �9,000 instead of the land. This increases the developer's costs and thus ma.y not be acceptable to us or the developer. To summarize and compare the results of the cost study the following table is provided: ITEM CULDESAC OPTION THRII-STREET OPTION Utilities & Street Hook-up Charges Subtotal Assessable Lots Per lot Assessment �•�;�� $112,000 $13,381 $125,381 12 $10,448 Add Cash Park Dedication n/a Assessable lots 12 Per lot Cost $10,448 $119,800 $6,660 $126,460 11 $11,496 + $9,000 12 $11,288 This table shows that the culdesac option is cheaper than the thru-street option. It shows this to be true whether the park dedication is land or cash for the thru-street option. As I stated earlier, all grading costa have been ignored since the Council indicated that the developer should complete the site grading. The last issue that should be discussed regarding the thru- street option is the hearing and approval process that will need to be followed if a change is made. Council may recall that the developer's original proposal included the thru- street from London to Butler. A public hearing on the proposal was conducted at the June Planning Commission meeting, and based on considerable neighborhood input, the culdesac plan was developed. A return to the thru-street option would entail a new planning application and a new public hearing before the Planning Commission. ACTION RSQIIIRFD Council should review this information and decide on whether and how to proceed on this project. If Council wishes to � accept the feasibility report and proceed with the project, Council should pass Resolution 92- , RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITAR.Y SEWERS, WATER, STORM SEWERS, AND STR£ET CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE GEORGE AND ELEANOR ARNDT ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT N0. 92, PROJECT NO. 1) City of Mendota Heights Dakota. County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 92- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT, ORDERING IMPROVEIV�NT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWERS, WATER, STORM SEWERS AND STREET CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE GEORGE AND ELEANOR ARNDT ADDITION (IlVIPROVIIVIENT NO. 92, PROJECT NO. 1) WHEREAS, the City Engineer has submitted his report to the City Council with respect to the proposed construction of the following improvements to serve the George and Eleanoi Arndt Addition, to-wit: The construction of an extension to the City's sanitary sewer system, including �� appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acquisition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets and easements in the area. hereinafter more particularly described. The construction of an extension to the City's water distribution system including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acquisition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets and easements in the area. hereinafter more particularly described. The construction of a storm sewer system including appurtenances and incidental thereto and the acquisition of easements, in and for the area hereinafter more particularly described. The construction of street improvements consisting of the acquisition of easements and the grading, stabilization, drainage and bituminous surfacing, and the construction of concrete curbs and gutters on the streets to be situated in the area hereinafter more particularly described. WHEREAS, Eleanor Arndt, the owner of the property, has heretofore in writing petitioned the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights requesting the above described improvements in said petition requested that the entire cost of said improvements be assessed against said properiy; and WHEREAS, the City Engi.neer reported that the proposed improvement and construction thereof were feasible and desirable and further reported on the proposed costs of said improvements and constxuction thereof; and WHEREAS, the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is situated within the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota and is more particularly described as follows: George and Eleanor Arndt Addition NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ItFSOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota. as follows: 1. That it is advisable, feasible, expedient and necessary that the City of Mendota Heights consiruct the above described improvements, and it is hereby ordered that said improvement be made. 2. That the City Engineer be and he is hereby authorized and directed to prepare plans and specifications for said improvement. 3. That said improvement shall hereafter be known and designated as Improvement No. 92, Project No. 1. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this lst day of September, 1992. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTPST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGH'�S 1VIII��O August 26, 1992 TO: Mayor, City Council and City A t r FROM: James E. Danielso Public Works o SUBJECT: Parking Around Henry Sibley High 5chool DISCUSSION: Attached is a letter from Mr. Thomas Keith, Assistant Principal, concerning a new parking policy to be implemented at Henry Sibley High School this fall. In his letter Mr. Keith informs the City that the School District intends to chazge students for parking in their lot ($50.00 per year). He suspects that some students may try to park on City streets in order to avoid the pazking charge and he asks that the City restrict parking on some of the surrounding streets. In a phone conversation with Mr. Keith I learned that there were three reasons for the School District adopting the parking charge. 1. To increase ridership on the school buses, they have received complaints that the buses are often quite empty. 2. To reduce the temptation for playing hooky. Students with cars will sometimes disappear in the afternoon. 3. As another source of revenue for a tight budget. Mr. Keith asks that the City restrict pazking to one hour on Warrior Drive and the Trunk Highway 110 frontage road by the school (see attached map). Bud e�t Im�act: In order to adequately post the streets suggested above it would take at least 14 signs. Material costs for installing each sign are approximately $50.00, resulting in a total cost of approadmately $700.00. RECOMMENDATION: The cul-de-sac at the north end of Warrior Drive is currently posted for "No Parking". Because the rest of Warrior Drive and the Trunk Highway 110 frontage road have only a few homes directly abutting, I feel that allowing some student parking in this area. will have little impact. I recommend that no parking restrictions be initiated at this time, however staff will monitor the situation and report back to Council if parking problems are encountered. Note: Delaware avenue, which also borders the school, is a County Road and would need County approval to establish any "No Parking" areas there. S� acTTort xEQumEn: Review the request and determine whether the City should grant the School District's request. Should Council desire to grant the request they should direct staff to prepare the appropri- ate ordinance authorizing the one hour parking zones. �� = .:aaaoot�O�� `t�� r�.o oes . . �,- :, ��. � � IIIG,f1:�_C/1:J_ \=J - �r� 1 �1qi �� va... • ' , � rRt � �� ` , � �� 9 � � � ��1! � /�:'1� (•1 N: J'•!"'�'�.'�\'/�'�q C'�i:�.l' - � � o■ �� p q ,�'�� s � IIIIIIP ■ �'� �■ee �-��Q�.�� r� �� ,�:t�.',�D;p►O��► ��q��0/,� � � �i� �� t� � � ■%l��ii�� i►�1�� _ �� - ,� • � � �� -�-...� 7Td. �� . .;t.l;i'1. �, ��1°��o�.,�p�'°000 �IIll�li� � Q� �a''��oiiil � i � � �a :�vo�.—.� �►a o � : ' �l��O;�o:��o��ee � �,�, �� t� � � , �� - ��;;�� +�av ■` = ^,�r i �► 4 �' S�..r�;,. Q ��.,._ � :�' y+,�K.�: � �a` �� ¢aQ�i�,�o ��r ��'�' .. c � ��, s000�Q .� ��e��ee s�o�� ----� - �,_,.�� w�.,i t:t�. - ;,—, — �--- �s !'!�►vo� A�v�� ,aoov ��oi�00Av�v � -� .. . � � � � a. � -d �� , o::� ��e��sd�e , � � � ti� aa�t�:r�:��s_t� � ' � ,� � �� , °� �. �� . .. .� s��oo��voo ��►� , �•�� ' i��i,�N�,•.�� e�.�� '�' i'si ��,►�►� � �� -��-� " M , y��•=� .":�. ��. �::��r��1{��essi�r � :�►:'��.'�e,` d-4"''�� - � � : �i��"� ` �:y� �=+�- a.i�w�� _�/ � ..—.��ai '�. ,� '�' �..�IIO��o��. ��+i'ii � . �• �. ;� - ��.o..Q � o�0�e� ��,� .. �sesse�� 0:40��, � , � Ji:��.�a�'i.�'a. �'• � � � 0.� .�� -''� � � Q' �/ _ �o:: ! Q �, �.:��. ..,. ��o�a�e o .;o► � 'a � �� eee�e�� .��■ � ��. e. �_ ,�• �� :•,�y�.��a��:cc�/� J�,�� _ ti,� e� � QI��'tM .._ _ .� ��0�� 0 =� �M��l � �� .� � �. �� 'si -�0��_�0 �e�� .� _. _:. �� - - __.._ ..�.. � ..� ��,-1• � �,, � - `� � � -��__� � '? - .ru� a �� __ .. � � ___ �� :. : , �.� ? � : ��c.�..,_.•:sn•,a. ��\ ., � ��oi%� �;a� , . . „��., " � � c�aaaflaoo o � �. : � N.I 1 �. \'1 �:� �Qo'rc�000 y � _ � �; ; , .,,�- ��,v,�''o� I � '�'=a.,.�+► ��Qp,tt � �. - � q -�-�� , y�/// � � � �� ' -/ �1 fl�� e O � 1 ��o0 1� ; �� ' 1 ' i M � • ` r' H'`��;a. . . . . . l �� ,�.,�� . � • � . . ,,,��e� `1��i��,. . .: � .� � ��,nk. .•��s. ��` ��•�� .�� , • �� IE :i` i i iii: i:i F."^�i ' t N �. -+ � t uts, August 20, 1992 Mr. Thomas Lowell, 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN Dear Mr. Lowell: DEAN VE[�DQES a�s�s�t ��p� Athletic Director City Manager � 55118 zson��s� Assistant Principal L1 This letter is to make you aware of the fact that Henrg Sibley High School is instituting a new policy for student parking effective with the start of school on September 8th. Students may either purchase a daily or a semester parking sticker, They are then able to p�rk in the lat at Henry Sibley. Starting the second week of classes, vehicles without a registration and parked in the Henry Sibley lot wi13 be towed, We feel that many students may try to circumvent thi��poliay by parking on the streets in residential areas. We woul�i encourage yau to look at limi�ing parking in the neighborhoods surrounding the schaai to one hour from 7:00 a.m. to 3:p.m. when school is in session. If you have any questions, ple�se feel free ta ca21 me at 681- 2355. Sincerely, .� r Thomas Keith, Assistant Principa3 Henry Sibley High School cc: Chief of Police 4° IlYDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRTCT I97 , District 4flices 1897 Delaware Avenue - West �t. Paul, Minnesota 55118 � - . (6I2j 68I-2800 FAX (612j 68I-SI02 , Serving Wcst St. Paul. Mendats Heights. Eagan. Mendatm. Sunfish La1ce. Lilpdale. axid Inver Grove Hci�hts T0: FROM: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO August 27, 1992 Mayor, City Council and City Administ \ Kevin Batchelder, Administrative As��t SUBJECT: September 29th Planning Commission/City Council Workshop - Topics for Discussion DISCIISSION At City Council's request, the Planning Commission has suggested a number of topics for the scheduled September 29, 1992 Joint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop. They are: 1. A Wetlands Ordinance with stronger enforcement provisions. 2. Mining, Land Alteration, Cuts and Fills, Borrow Pits. 3. Comprehensive Plan Review of I-494 frontage from Highway 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 55 to Dodd Road. Downtown Mendota Heights. Tree Preservation Ordinance. Mendota Interchange Project. Air Traffic/Noise Update Pond Preservation and Use of Chemical Fertilizer. Expansion of Walking Trails including Lexington to Beth Jacob Synagogue. Preservation of Large Land Tracts. Development Options for Highway 55 and Highway 110. I-35E Issues - Expansion to Three Lanes. Update on Remaining Vacant Lands. Housekeeping Variances. This is a rather long list of suggested topics and staff recommends that Council consider which of these, or any other additional topics, should be included on the agenda. Staff will then prepare a structured agenda with suggested time allotments for each topic in order to keep the workshop to approxima.tely 2 1/2 hours. ACTION RE4IIIRED Review the suggested topics, consider any other additional topics and provide any specific direction to staff on how Council desires to proceed. � RLB:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO August 28, 1992 4 T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ SUBJECT: Schedule Council Workshop for October DISCUSSION At the last City Council meeting, it was agreed that the Council would conduct a workshop session in October to further discuss atorm water improvement funding options. In addition, I would also like to recommend that we spend a brief portion of the workshop discussing our Water Agreement with the City of St. Paul which is up for renewal. Staff was directed to bring forth several dates in October which might prove workable for the workshop. Three possible dates are as follows: • 1. Thursday, October 8th 2. Tuesday, October 13th 3. Thursday, October 22nd Council should also discuss an appropriate meeting time. We could either meet at our regular 7:30 start, or begin the meeting earlier, depending upon Councilmember preference. ACTION RF�4IIIRED Council should discuss their availability in the month of October, and chose an appropriate workshop •date and time to discuss storm water improvement funding issues and the St. Paul Water Agreement. MTL:kkb �b►-- �t3�' _ "�`'�l , �r� �� ar � � � � � N 4� ° �� + �� tt � ��V�� _'� tbQ�x L i n e_''�-_-'�._--� . 10 ��'�' 1 d' n� ---- "—"._—�- 5' 9� ___----- a� �a G � J O �c �Q �'�e - 0 0 � �'`° � 1�' �- tn � a � � �a "� - `S S� � � aQ Q . 4 '"� �`�,, '� r�'i � � �� ♦ �t'�/ - . � � • � V p �''r �f ` �� . ��/ �/I'� � ,� � �i ��' � � �� . � ` / �`':�? . � �� '� . M oQ�,a �C� '��„ � `1. S' �� . tt•'' �i''7+� .,�` ' p�,` .� •"'g=2't � s � : ,� � iQ� � �o � :,.,. - �:z�" �"� N =�� M_ _____ •�f JO� Bur'/di�e� - S'etbctEk L 2! 5. 22 ' �`r��3� ° 3C1' �t3"W a�, 0 � ,