1992-02-180
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
February 18, 1992 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption
4. Consent Calendar
a. Acknowledgment of the January Treasurer's Report.
b. Acknowledgment of the draft February Parks and
Recreation Commission Minutes.
c. Adoption of R13SOLIITION NO. 92-11, RESOLUTION
ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES RELATING TO COMPLIANCE WITH
REIMBUR.SEMENT BOND REGULATIONS UNDER THE INTERNAL
REVENUE CODE.
d. Approval of the Joint Powers Agreement for 1992 Solid
Waste Abatement.
e. Approval to Purchase Computer Printer.
f. Information on Workman's Compensation Insurance Premium.
g. Approval to Purchase 1992 Ma.rked Squad Cars.
h. Authorize Transmittal of Letters to Congressman
regarding Federal Cable Television Legislation.
i. Approval of the List of Contractors.
j. Approval of the List of Claims.
k. Accept Resignation of Receptionist Maria Karels
effective March 2, 1992.
Ead of Conseat Calendar
�
5. Public Commeats
6. Proclamation
a. Proclamation of March 9-13 as "Support Your Chamber of
Commerce Week".
7. Hearinq
a. Alley Vacation - RESOLUTION NO. 92-12
(Al1ey is located between Lots 1-6 and 11-16, Block 5,
T.T. Smith's Subdivision No. 3)
8. IInfinished and New Business
�-
a. Discussion on Street Rehabilitation Policy.
a
�
b. Discussion on Legislative Redistricting/Precinct �
Changes.
c. Discussion on Snow Removal Policy.
d. Discussion on Presidential Primary/Election Judges -
RESOLIITION NO. 91-13 AND RESOLLTTION NO. 91-14.
9. Couacil Comments
10 . �id j oura
.�
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
February 18, 1992
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for February 18th Council Meeting
Two items have been added to the agenda (4k) and (8d)*.
3. Aaenda Adoption
It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda
printed on green paper.
4k. Accept Resignation of Receptionist Maria Karels effective
March 2, 1992.
Sd. Discussion on Presidential Primary/Election Judges.
���;i�i�
,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
February 18, 1992 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption
4. Consent Calendar
a. Acknowledgment of the January Treasurer's Report.
b. Acknowledgment of the draft February Parks and
Recreation Commission Minutes.
c. Adoption of RESOLIITION NO. 92-11, RESOLUTION -
ESTABLISHING PROCEDUR.ES RELATING TO COMPLIANCE WITH
REIMBURSEMENT BOND REGULATIONS UNDER THE INTERNAL
REVENUE CODE.
d. Approval of the Joint Powers Agreement for 1992 Solid
Waste Abatement.
e. Approval to Purchase Computer Printer.
f. Information on Workman's Compensation Insurance Premium.
g. Approval to Purchase 1992 Marked Squad Cars.
h. Authorize Transmittal of Letters to Congressman
regarding Federal Cable Television Legislation.
i. Approval of the List of Contractors.
j. Approval of the List of Claims.
F�nd of Conseat Calendar
5. Public Comments
6. Proclamatioa
a. Proclamation of March 9-13 as "Support Your Chamber of
Commerce Week".
7. HearinQ
a. Alley Vacation - RESOLIITION NO. 92-12
(Alley is located between Lots 1-6 and 11-16, Block 5,
T.T. Smith's Subdivision No. 3) _
8. IInfinished and New Business
a. Discussion on Street Rehabilitation Policy.
b. Discussion on Legislative Redistricting/Precinct
Changes.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
TREASIIRER'S REPORT, J�iNUARY, 1992 �
DAROTA COIINTY STATE BANR
Checking Account 3.850
Savings Account 3.75�
C.D. Rep.
Collateral - Bonds
Gov't. Guar.
CHEROREE STATE BANK
BALANCE
$ 105,716.38
$ 541.58
0
$ 106,257.96'
$ 500,000.00
$ 100,000.00
C.D. due 1/31/92 Q 5.0� $ 350,000.00
Saving Cert. 2/28/92 @ 5 1/4� S 13,952.59
$ 363,952.59
Collateral - Bonds
Gov't. Guar.
FNMA 7.30% 12/2/98 FBS
Fed. Farm. Cr. 6.7� Notes
Due 12-5-96 (FBS)
U.S. Treasury 8 5/S�
5-15-93 Notes (FBS)
GNMA Mtg. Pool 9� (PRU)
$ 500,000.00
$ 100,000.00
COLLATER AT•
$600,000.00
$ 600,000.00
Value 1-30-92 (est.)
$ 499,695.50 $ 500,500.00
$ 500,008.00
$ 498,671.88
$ 258,546.54
FHL 7 1/2� Mtg Pool @ 98 5/8
(.79 factor) 575,000 (PRU) $ 448,272.13
U.S. Treasury Money Mkt $2,264,113.55
Gov't. Securities Fund $1,200,000.00
TOTAL FIINDS AVAILABLL:
Funds Available 12/31/91
1/31/91
$6,139,518.15
$7,013,620.57
$5,390,084.00
Rates Monev Market
Jan. 31 Bank 3.35�
Fid 4.32%
Escrow Funds (American National Bank) 12-30-91
City Hall Buildings
Railroad Crossing
TOTAL
LES:kkb
$ 15,451.70
5169,932.54
$185,384.24
$ 500,500.00
$ 525,000.00
$ 267,937.00
$ 448,272.00
$2,880,000.00
$2,014,000.00
�. i
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAROTA COIINTY, MINNESOTA
PARRS �,I�TD RECREAT�ION COl�lISSION MINIITES
FTsBRUARY 11, 1992
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation
Commission was held on Tuesday, February 11, 1992, in the City Hall
Large Conference Room, 1101 Victoria Curve. Th'e meeting was called
to order at 7:08 o'clock P.M. The following Commission members
were present: Huber, Katz, Hunter, Spicer, Kleinglass.
Commissioner Lundeen arrived late. Commissioner Damberg was
excused. Also present were Parks Project Ma.nager Guy Kullander and
Administrative Assistant Batchelder.
}3LFsCTION OF OFFICERS
Commissioner Spicer moved to appoint officers for the
1992 Parks and Recreation Commission as follows:
John Huber - Chair
Vicki Katz - Vice Chair
Kevin Batchelder - Secretary
Commissioner Hunter seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
APPROVAL OF MINiJTES
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Commissioner
1992, Parks
corrected.
Commissioner
Spicer moved approval of the January 14,
and Recreation Commission minutes as
Kleinglass seconded the motion.
The correction involved Commissioner Hunter's desire to
let it be known that he was not opposed to a wild flower
planting program.
TENNIS RESLRVATION
Commissioner Spicer explained that Bob Eng, Commissioner
of Mend-Eagan tennis, had informed him the Sibley fields
would be used this year for the youth tennis program run
by Mend-Eagan. Commissioner Spicer stated Mend-Eagan
tennis formally withdraws their request to reserve the
Valley Park tennis courts. The Commission discussed the
City's first come, first served policy on reserving
February 11, 1992
Page 2
tennis courts and felt it was appropriate.
VERBAL IIPDATES
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated that John
Huber and Mike Lundeen were both reappointed for another
three year term on the Parks and Recreation Commission by
unanimous vote of the City Council at their February 4,
1992 meeting.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated the City had
received a response from Tim Agness, Park Planner for the
City of St. Paul, regarding our letter of concerns about
lighting, traffic, noise and the proximity of single
family neighborhoods to the campground included in the
Lilydale/Harriet Island Regional Park. He stated the
City of St. Paul recognized our concerns and indicated
they would be happy to allow the City of Mendota Heights
to have a representative on the Campground Advisory
Committee at the time of its design.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated the City
Council recently authorized two purchases for the Parks
Department that were included in the 1992 Budget, the
Toro Snowblower and Cushman Truckster.
Parks Project Manager Kullander described the new trail
that would be included with the reconstruction of Mendota
Heights Road from I-35 to Dodd Road as a Municipal State
Road (MSA) Project this summer. He stated that MSA Funds
would pay for 5/8 of the cost of the trail and that it is
a possibility the City Council could decide to pay for
the remaining 3/8 with excess MSA money. Parks Project
Manager Kullander stated the new section of trail would
be on the north side of Mendota Heights Road from Dodd
Road to I-35E along Mendota Heights Road. He stated
Mendota Heights Road would also receive a new portion of
bike trail from Highway 55 to Pilot Knob Road through the
business park. He also explained the new Victoria trail
that would be done as part of the realignment of Victoria
Road thia summer. He explained that an eight to ten foot
strip would be cut out of the old Victoria roadway. A
future City project should include some landscaping at
the top and bottom of the trail. He stated this would
give the City a trail from Celia Road to Highway 13.
Parks Project Ma.nager Rullander stated the last link to
be completed would be from Celia to Celia along Victoria
Road at a future date. He stated that Highway 13 would
have a widened shoulder from where last year's
construction ended all the way to Water Street in
Lilydale. He further explained the new trails that would
February 11, 1992
Page 3
be a part of the Mendota Bridge/Highway 55 realignment.
Commissioner Katz inquired if the oak trees would be
coming down as part of the Mendota Bridge Proj ect . Parks
Project Manager Kullander responded that MnDOT will save
as many trees as possible. Commissioner Katz stated the
community should take some action to save these oak
trees.
RENSINGTON PARK
Parks Project Manager Kullander explained the design of
the triangular area that includes the play equipment, the
comfort station, picnic areas, parking lot and bike
trail. He stated that this is a dense usage area and
will not be conducive to quiet passive uses when soccer
games are in progress. --
Parks Project Ma.nager stated that Station 19 Architects
were 95 percent completed with the final plans. He
explained the floor plan as revised due to Council input .
Parks Project Manager Kullander stated the Council opted
for the swing down door for a concession window and added
overhangs to the picnic shelters. He stated the City
staff is going to be the general contractor on this
proj ect and will be hiring the subcontractors . He stated
that Requests for Proposals would go out requesting bids
on the proj ect . He estimated this would cut costs on the
project in the neighborhood of five to ten percent.
Parks Project Manager Kullander stated he would draw the
landscape plan and submit this to our City Planner for
review and critique. He stated this process would be
used to come up with an acceptable landscape plan to bid
upon.
Parks Project Ma.nager Kullander inquired about the
barriers behind the soccer nets along I-494. The Parks
and Recreation Commission stated they would like to see
permanent fences and not nets that require more
ma.intenance. He stated it would cost approximately an
extra $20,000 to sod Kensington Park as opposed to
seeding it and that he could do this as a bid option in
the proj ect . Parks Proj ect Ma.nager Kullander stated with
irrigation both types of grass will take, however sod
would definitely be ready for use in 1993 where with seed
it is unknown about the level of play available in 1993.
The Parka and Recreation Commission directed Kullander to
bid both in the project.
Parks Proj ect Manager Kullander stated he will be working
with NSP, MnDOT and the pipeline company about the types
�
February il, 1992
Page 4
of landscaping they would allow in their easement areas.
He stated that he had been presented with a proposal to
install brick pavers in the comfort station area verses
concrete. He stated pavers would cost twice as much as
concrete. The Commission stated they did not want to
bother with brick pavers.
Rullander stated play equipment being installed in
Rensington Parks, would have to be bid out again. The
Commission did not want to any suppliers and directed
staff to review any submittals.
Commissioner Lundeen arrived at 7:40 o'clock P.M.
Chair Huber inquired about the Americans for Disability
Act requirements for the play equipment. Parks Project
Manager Kullander responded the play equipment is being
designed to meet the requirements and would have "like"
equipment avai.lable for persons with disabilities.
Kullander mentioned that vending ma.chine operators had
shown an interest in installing their machines in this
park and that they were satisfied with the design of the
building and its setup for vending machines.
Kullander stated the final plans would be ready for
review by the Parks and Recreation Commission at their
March meeting where upon it would go to the City Council
for their approval. He stated the bidding process would
occur in March and April with a May or June construction
date depending on when Centex completes the rough
grading.
RBCREATION PROGRAI�SING
Administrative Assistant Batchelder explained the
inventory of park services offered by three neighboring
Cities, the Community Education Department, Mend-Eagan
Association and the Dodge Nature Center that had been
prepared for the Parks and Recreation Commission's
review. Batchelder stated it was the intent of the
inventory to survey the recreation service universe and
enable the City to discover where gaps in service for
recreation programming exist. He stated the City can
then conduct a needs analysis to determine what area of
recreation programming the City may wish to provide. He
stated the City could then begin to examine what types of
costs would be involved with that level of recreation
programming and begin to budget if any level of service
is desired. Administrative Assistant Batchelder thanked
Maria Karels, clerk/receptionist, for all of the data
�
February il, 1992
Page 5
compiling and preparation of the inventory that was
provided for this evening's meeting.
Commissioner Katz stated that the lack of recreation
programming and services in Mendota Heights is
embarrassing, however residents can participate in
surrounding communities by paying a non-resident fee and
they are not excluded from those programs. Commissioner
Katz stated if you add in the Community Education, the
Dodge Nature Center and other local programs, the
community does have some level of service.
Chair Huber stated that this is an immense amount of data
and where to get started was a good question. He stated
he feels that Mendota Heights should sponsor a special
event, like a volleyball day, and put some effort into a
single day activity in order to get an idea what the
reaction from the community is. He stated an example
could be a 5k walk on Valley trail.
Commissioner Spicer stated the point was it would take a
part time staff person to put together the special event
that Chair Huber had mentioned. He stated the City needs
a part time staff person for recreation to do the
scheduling, event planning and coordination. He stated
the City has put forth a major effort to build
recreational facilities and that it is now time to
include at least a part time person in the budget to
implement recreation services. Administrative Assistant
Batchelder stated that consolidation with and cooperation
with another municipality is another possible approach.
Commissioner Katz stated the City of Mendota Heights
should be providing recreation services for itself.
Commissioner Spicer stated the City should have our own
part time recreation coordinator.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder explained he had
attempted to have the Parks and Recreation Commission
define the recreation programs they would desire to get
into, in order that he can analyze the cost and budget
impacts and staffing levels necessary to begin scheduling
and adminiatering leagues and recreation programs in
Mendota Heights as part of the 1993 Budget process.
Chair Huber inquired if there was presently someone on
staff who could step into more hours in order to do
recreation programming. Administrative Assistant
Batchelder responded it depends on what level of service
the City desires to get into for recreation programming.
He stated to continue to add duties to current employees
r �
February 11, 1992
Page 6
workloads would not attain a very high level of service
or efficiency for recreation programming.
Commissioner Katz stated a part time person for
recreation would be appropriate for the City in order to
coordinate recreation programs and to make available
information to residents desiring to know about
recreation opportunities. Commissioner Katz stated she
thought Chair Huber's idea of a big single event was a
good idea and informing the public about recreation
resources is a big part of what the City needs to begin
doing. Commissioner Katz expressed concern over the tax
impact of someday having a large Recreation Department.
Commissioner Spicer stated what is needed is a permanent
part time staff person with Park and Recreation
Commission direction to plan and coordinate programs.
Commissioner Spicer stated the other option would be to
carve out some time from someone who is on City staff.
Commissioner Kleinglass inquired if there would be
interest in hiring a graduate student to help plan the
service levels and recreation programs needed by the
City. Commissioner Kleinglass stated that currently
there are no passive recreation activities sponsored by
the City, only athletic programs. Commissioner
Kleinglass felt this was a real need in the City of
Mendota Heights.
Commissioner Lundeen stated he felt it was important if
the City hired a part time person that that person be a
permanent employee, in order they be committed into the
plan that they would be developing. He stated it would
not be helpful for the City to get someone in on a
temporary basis who would not be part of implementing a
recreation plan. Commissioner Lundeen stated he felt a
single event ma.y help show the demand for recreation in
Mendota Heights . Commissioner Lundeen stated if the City
were to begin with a part time permanent recreation
coordinator, there is a possibility that the recreation
program would continue to grow. He stated the community
may be better off with a recreation program that evolves
and expands.
Chair Huber summarized that the Parks and Recreation
Commission would like to see a permanent part time staff
person to schedule and coordinate athletic and non-
athletic events including possibly "family days" and
single day events. He directed staff to prepare a rough
job description for a permanent part time person and to
February 11, 1992
Page 7
figure out the costs and staff time involved in beginning
a recreation coordination program. The Parks and
Recreation Commission desired to see this permanent part
time recreation coordinator included in the 1993 Budget
process.
CONCESSION STAND
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated the City
Council had desired to have a concession stand policy
that allows access to community, civic and recreation
groups as opposed to a single contracted vendor. He
stated that instead of a contract with a single vendor it
would be necessary for the City to have a policy
regulating the reservation and use of the concession
� stands both at Mendakota and Kensington. He stat�d the
policy would have to include provisions for worker's
compensation insurance and general liability insurance.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder asked the Commission
if they desired to allow alcohol (3.2 beer) to be sold at
the concession stand. The Commission was of a consensus
that no alcohol should be served from the City
concessions . The Commission indicated that a rent should
be charged and that vending ma.chine operators should pay
a percentage to the City. The Commission stated that any
revenues due to recreation activities should be
considered expenses recovered to pay for recreation
activities in the General Fund. The Commission stated
they desire to see a deposit or bonding in order to make
users of the concession stand accountable.
In response, the Commission stated the approval process
for users of the concession stand should be done by City
staff based on criteria that protects the City for
damages, risk management and has revenue provisions.
SOFTBALL FIELD RESERVATIONS
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated the
neighborhood parks softball fields are currently used on
a first come, first served basis except for Mend-Eagan
reservations for little league. Typically these fields
are not reserved but when they are reserved they are
usually on an as requested basis without a fee. The
Commission concurred that this approach should continue
with the neighborhood parks. The Commission discussed
fees for non-residents using the neighborhood parks
fields and felt that a fee for non-residents was
appropriate. The Commission also felt it was appropriate
a fee should be charged when the City park crews get
requests for moving picnic tables.
i' ' ' ��
February 11, 1992
Page 8
The Commission felt that rental fees were necessary for
the adult standard softball fields which include Civic
Center Park and Mendakota Park. The Commission felt a
priority system should be established designating
resident use first. The Commission felt a sign up date
would be necessary for Mend-Eagan, for the men's league,
for kittenball and for any others who desire to reserve
or use these fields. The Comm'ission felt anybody
desiring to hold a tournament at Mendakota Complex should
seek Park Board approval of the request.
WILDFLOWERS ALONG TR.AIL WAYS
Administrative Assistant Batchelder responded to last
month's Commission request that it might be�possible to
find $2, 000 in the Park Budget to attempt a pilot project
for wildflowers along the trail ways. The Commission
directed staff to contact professionalg and seek ideas on
what could be purchased for $2, 000 and report back to the
Parks and Recreation Commission.
ADJOIIRNMENT
There being no further business, the Parks and Recreation
Commission adjourned their meeting at 8:55 o'clock P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
i •
February 10, 1992
T0: Mayor, City Council and City Administ�aCt�
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer �
SUBJECT: Reimbursement Bond Regulations
DISCIISSION
In August 1991, the Council adopted Resolution No. 91-50,
'�Resolution Establishing Procedures Relating to Compliance with
Reimbursement Bond Regulations". This was in anticipation of
regulations which had been proposed by the IRS.
Current Status
The IRS regulations have now been adopted and our Bond
Attorneys suggest that we readopt the Resolution so that it
complies with the final regulations. Most changes have made the
rulings more sensitive to City concerns.
ACTION RFQUIRED
Adopt Resolution No. 92- ,°RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING
PROCEDURES RELATING TO COMPLIANCE WITH REIMBURSEMENT BOND
REGULATIONS UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE" to replace Resolution
N0. 91-50.
LES:kkb
RESOLUTIQN N0.
RES4LUTION ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES
RELATING TO �COMPLTANCE WITH REIMBURSEMENT BOND
REGi�fLATIONS UNDER TIiE INTE�RNAL REVEN�T3E CODE
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City
o� Mendata Heights , Minnesota {the �'City"� , as follows:
l. �tecitals.
(a) The Internal Revenue Ser'vice has issued final
Treasury Regulations Sec�ion 1.103-18 {the "Regulatiorrs"}
dealing with reimbursemen� bond proceeds, which wauld include
those proceeds of the City � s bonds to be used to reimburse the
City for any proj ect e�cpenditure paid by the City priar to the
time of the issuance of those bonds,
(b� The Regulations generally require that the City make
a prior declaration af its officia2 intent to reimburse itself
for such prior expenditures out of the proceeds of subsequent
borrowings, that such declaration generally be made on or
before the date the expenditure 3.s actually paid, that the
bonding ocaur and the reimbursement allacation be made from
the praceeds of such bonds within one year of the payment of
the expenditure (or nat later than one year after the project
is placed in service, if that is a longer period), and that
the expenditure be a capital expenditure.
(c) The City desires to comply wa.th the Regulations and
to establish aertain procedures relating thereto.
{d} The City's bond counsel has advised the City that
the Regulations do not apply, and hence the provisions of this
Resolution are intended to have no application, to payments of
Cit�y project costs first made by the City out of i�he proceeds
of bonds issued prior to the date of such payments.
' 2. Q icial Intent Declara�ion. The Regulations, in the
situations in which they apply, require the City to have made an
official deciaration af its reasonable intentian (hereinafter
referred to as the "O�ficia2 Intent Declaration" or the
"Declaration"j to reimburse itself far previousl'y paid project
expenditures out of the proceeds of subsequent bonds ar other
borrowings, The Couneil hereby authorizes the Cityf-,2rsasurer
�o make t�he City"s Official Intent Declarata.ons or to delegate from
time ta time that responsibility to other appropriate City
employees. Each Declaration shall comply with the requirements of
the Regulations, inaluding without limitation the fo2lowing:
27892
�
27892
(a) Each Declaration shall be made
the City pays the applicable project cost
the City reasonably intends and expects
for the expenditure with proceeds of
Declaration may be made substantially
"Declaration of Official Intent" which is
a part of this Resolution.
�n or before the date
and shall state that
to reimburse itself
a borrowing. Each
in the form of the
attached to and made
(b) Each Declaration shall specifically contain the
following statement: ��This Declaration.is a declaration of
official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.103-18."
(c) Each Declaration shall and is hereby declared to be
made and filed in the publicly available official books,
records, or proceedings of the City, which shall be reasonably
available for public inspection at City Hall during normal
business hours of the City on every business day during the
period beginning on the earlier of 10 days after the making of
the Declaration or the date of issuance of the reimbursement
bonds and ending on the day after the issuance of such bonds.
(d) Each Declaration shall, at a minimum, contain a
general functional description of the property, project, or
program for which the expenditure to be reimbursed is paid
(for example, "1992 Street Improvement Project" or other
specific, identifiable project of the Cityj or, in the
alterative, shall identify the particular fund or account of
the City from which the expenditure to be reimbursed is paid,
including a description of the general functional purpose of
that fund or account (for example, "park and recreation fund -
recreational facility capital improvement program").
(e) Each Declaration shall also contain a statement of
the maximum principal amount of debt expected to be issued for
the subject project.
(f) Care shall be taken so that the City, or its
authorized representatives under this Resolution, not make
Declarations in cases where the City does not reasonably
expect that it will ultimately issue reimbursement bonds to
provic�e long-term f inancing for the subj ect proj ect costs, and
the City officials are hereby authorized to consult with bond
counsel to the City concerning the requirements �of the
Regulations in general and their application in particular
circumstances. It is the Council's intention that
Declarations not be made (i) when available funds of the City
have been or are reasonably expected to be dedicated or
otherwise reserved to fund on a long-term basis the particular
expenditures involved� or (ii) when it is not reasonably
expected that reimbursement bonding will occur. .
2
��
(g) The Council shall be advised from time to time on
the desirability and timing of the issuance of reimbursement
bands relating to project e�enditures for which the City has
made Official Intent Declaratior�s, including recommendation�
on the timing af the issuance of such bonds sa that the
"reimbursement allocation" described in the Regulations and in
paragragh 3 belaw can be made within the 1 year time limits
prescribed in the Regulations.
(h} This Resoiution shall supplement and amend all prior
determinations and policies adopted by the City in regard to
complying with the Regulations, as initially praposed, and in
the event af any inconsist�ency between the t�rms provided in
this Resolutian and said prior determinations or po2icies, the
provisions of this Resolution shall govern.
3. �Zeimbursement Allocations,. The designated City•offiaials
shall also be responsible for making the ��reimbursement
allocations" described in the Regulations, being generally the
transfer of the appropriate amaunt of reimbursement bond proceeds
to reimburse the source of temporary financing used by the City to
make payment of the prior expenditure. Each allocation shall be
evidenced by an entry an the o�ficial boaks or records af the City
maintained for such reimbursement bonds; sha11 specifically
identify the actual prior expenditure being reimbursed or, in the
case of the reimbursement of a particular fund or account, the fund
or account from which the expenditure was paid; and shall be
effective ta relieve the bond proceeds involved from any
restriction under the bond resolution or o�her relevant legal
documents for those bands and under any applicab2e state statute
applicable to unspent proceeds of such bond issue.
Adopted this day of , 1992, by the
Czty Council.
z7s9z
3
CERTIFICATI4N
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and ac�ing City
of the City of ,
Minnesota, hereby certifies the following:
The foregoing is true and carrect copy of a Resoiution on file
and of official, publicly available record in the offices of the
City, which Resolution relates to procedures of the City for
compliance with certain IRS Regulatians on. reimbursement bonds.
Said Resolution was duly adop�ed by the governing body af the City
(the "Council") at a regular or special meeting of the Council held
on , 1992. Said meeting was duly called,
regularly held, apen to the public, and held at the p].ace at which
meetings of the Council are regularly held. Councilmember
maved the adoption of the Resolution, which
mot�.on was secanded by Councilmember � �".-A vote
being taken on the mation, the following members of the Council
voted in favor of the motion to adopt the Resolution:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said Resolutian was declared duly passed and adapted.
The Resolution is in full forae and effect and no action has been
taken by the Council which would in any way a2ter or amend the
Resoluta.on.
WITNESS MY HAND afficially as the City of
the City of , Minnesota, this day of
. 1992 ,
City
City o� , Minnesota
�' -.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
i �� •
February 13 1992
To: Mayor,-City Council and City Adminis r
From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist ntf�f
Subject: Joint Powers Agreement for 1992 Solid Waste Abatement
DISCIISSION
At the September 17, 1991 City Council meeting, the Council
approved Resolution No. 91-69, A RESOLUTION SEEKING FUNDING FROM
DAKOTA COUNTY FOR CONTINUATION OF COMMUNITY LANDFILL ABATEMENT
PROGRAM, requesting that Dakota County approve our 1992 Funding
Application for the amount of $6,820 for solid waste abatement
efforts during 1992. The requested amount is to cover the
following:
Direct Salaries $4,620
Direct Mileage $ 200
Printing, Postage 2 000
Total $6,820
Dakota County approved our request and has submitted a Joint
Powers Agreement for our signature and execution.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that the City Council authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute the agreement for 1992 Landfill Abatement Funding
from Dakota County.
ACTION REQIIIRED
If the Council desires to implement the recommendation, they
should pass a motion authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute the Joint Powers Agreement for 1992 Landfill Abatement
Funding from Dakota County.
DAKOTA COUIVTY
DIVISION OF PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT
14955 GALAXIE AVENUE
DEPARTMENTS OF -
• ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
• HIGHWAYS
• PARKS
• SURVEY
• OFFICE OF PLANNING
M E M O R A N D U M
LOUIS J. BREIMHURST, P.E.
DIRECTOR
(612)891-7005
FAX (612) 891-7031
APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124-8579
TO: Local Solid Aaste Staff j�(1pyy���� �
I •�{�� µ
FROM: Gayle Prest, Recycling Special
DATE: January 10, 1992
SIIBJECT: 1992 Landfill Abatement Joint Powers Agreements
Enclosed please find the��1.992 Community Landfill Abatement
Joint Powers Agreement between Dakota County and your
community which reflects the 1992 recycling program and
funding.
Please forward to the appropriate official for signature,
and notarize before returning it to me. Once received, I
will forward your first 1992 payment. After it has been
executed by the County, I will send you a copy for your
files.
If you have any questions or concerns do not hesitate to
contact me. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
AN E9UAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
�
�
JOINT FOWSRS
This Agreement is between Dakota County (hereinafter "County"')
and the City of Mendota Heights (hereinafter ."Municipality"),
through their Board and Council, respectively. .
WHSREAS, on August 1, 1991, by Resolution No. 91-559, the Dakota
County Board of Commissioners adopted its Community Abatement
Funding Program Guidelines; and
W�R�S, the County Recycling Policies adopted in Resolution No.
88-650 and revised by Resolution No. 91-482 •include a requirement
that all cities and townships within the County participate in
recycling activities; and
WI�REAS, the County desires to provide a portion of the costs
incurred by cities and townships to implement and operate local
comprehensive landfill abatement programs; and
W�I2EAS, the Municipality has implemented and operates a local
comprehensive landfill abatement program•within its jurisdiction and
desires to receive such County funding support as may be available;
and � �
WI�2EAS, any local governmental unit may act together with any
county under a joint powers agreement to accomplish landfill
abatement pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 473.811, subd. 7; and
W�REAS, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners has allocated
funds expected to be received from surcharge collections pursuant to
Minn. Stat. § 115A.919.
NOW, T�REFORE, the County and the Municipality agree to this
Joint Powers Agreement pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§ 471.59 and
473.811, subd. 7, as follows: �
1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for
cooperation between the County and the Municipality to implement and
operate a local comprehensive landfill abatement program in
accordance with the Municipality's Funding application attached and
incorporated herein by reference. '
2. Term. This Agreement shall be in effect from January 1, 1992,
and shall continue in effect until terminated in accordance with the
provisions herein. This Agreement may be amended in accordance with
paragraph 18, by the attachment and incorporation of subsequent
years' approved funding applications. .
3. Program. The Municipality shall implement and operate a local
comprehensive landfill abatement program that substantiall�y complies
with the current program guidelines for Community Landfil� Abatement
Administration and Education as approved by Board Resolution No. 91-
559. The Municipality must demonstrate that a recycling program is:
Page 1 of 7
currently in operation in its municipal buildings; that the program
is consistent with the approved Dakota County Solid Waste Master
Plan; and that the Targeted Community Program outlined in the Dakota
County Recycling Implementation Strategy, as amended, is
maintained. � The Target Community Program for single family
dwellings includes at least bi-weekly recyclables collection using a
recycling container. Al1 multi-family dwellings must also have
recycling containers available. Under both programs, newspapers,
cans (food & beverage) 3 colors•of glass, corrugated cardboard, and
plastic containers with a neck must be collected for recycling and
other such items as required by County Board resolution. The
program must be designed to meet or exceed a 16� residential
recycling rate. Not more than 25� of the recycled materials, by
weight, can consist of yardwaste or Christmas trees.
The Municipality shall implement the activities substantially as
set forth in its Funding Application, attached as. Exhibit •1 as
approved by the County. The Dakota County Physical Development
Director or his designee shall have the authority to approve
modifications to the Municipality's program and funding as requested
by the Municipality, as long as the amount payable under this
Agreement does not exceed the amount approved by the County Board
and so long as the proposed modifications are consistent with the
County's guidelines.
4. Payment Schedule and Annual Report. Upon receipt and approval
of progress reports as prescribed by the County, the County will pay
the Municipality the grant amount approved by the County Board in
two (2) equal installments on the following dates:
1. February 1, of the grant year
2. August 1, of the grant year
By January 30 of the year following the grant, the Municipality
shall submit its Annual Report in the form prescribed by the
County. The County shall evaluate the Municipality's performance
pursuant to this Agreement. The following evaluation formula.shall
be utilized:
16� of residential wastes recycled
(4.69 points per 1� of waste abated).
Only 25� of tonnage used to calculate
recycled wastes may be yardwaste.
Conducted promotional program as outlined
in application and approved by the County.
75 pts. .
25 pts.
The amount payable in 1992 shall not exceed Six Thousand Eight
Hundred Twenty and No/100 Dollars ($6,820.00). -
The Dakota
shall have
long as the
consistent
request.
County Physical Development Director or his designee
the authority to approve modifications to the grant so
proposed modifications do not exceed this amount and .are
with the County�s guidelines and the Municipality's
Page 2 of 7
5. Eligibility. Only those activities which are included within an
approved Application for Funding shall be eligib�e for funding under
this Agreement. Activities included within the approved Application
to the extent reimbursed by a source other than as provided for in
this Agreement, are not eligible for reimbursement under this
Agreement. Any revenues received by the Municipality from
activities reimbursed pursuant to this Agreement shall be applied to
the costs of such activities.
6. Documentation. To receive funding from the County pursuant to
this Agreement, the Municipality shall: �
A. Reserve funding allocation for each calendar year by submitting
to the County by October 1 of the year preceding the grant an
application, budget and support documentation as required by the
County. The application shall be available from the Dakota County
Physical Development Division. The application shall be accompanied
by a certified resolution or minutes from the governing body of�the
Municipality requesting the funding allocation and by docwnentation
which' describes. the municipal office paper recycling program
operated by the Municipality.
B. Submit as part of the Annual Report documentation of costs
actually incurred for activities included within the app'roved
Funding Application and revenues received� from sources other than
the Count� in support of such activities by January 30 of the year
following the date the costs were incurred. Documentation shall be
submitted in the format prescribed by the County. Documentation
shall include an accounting of the number of tons of each recyclable
material collected through all residential non-curbside recycling
programs within the Municipality, and an accounting of the number of
tons of recyclable material which has been marketed, together with a
description of the methodology used for calculation. For composting
programs, the documentation shall include either a report of the
actual number of tons of yardwaste delivered to compost facilities
or, if actual tons are not available, an estimate of the number of
cubic yards of yardwaste delivered to composting facilities together
with a�methodology used for calculation. The Municipality agrees to
furnish the County with additional reports in the form and at the
frequencies requested by .the County for financial evaluation and
program management purposes.
7. Failure to meet Goals. If the Municipality fa�.ls to achieve an
evaluation score of at least 91 points, the Municipality will
reimburse the County the following percentages of funds paid
pursuant to Paragraph 4 based on the following evaluation scores:
0-50 points � 50�
51-75 points 25�
76-90 points 10�
91-100 points 0�
Page 3 of 7
If the Municipality receives funding pursuant to this Agreement
in the year following the grant, such reimbursement shall be
deducted from the next year's grant from the County to the
Municipality. If the Municipality does not receive such funding in
the following year, such reimbursement shall be made by•July 1 of
the year following the year for which the monies were granted.
Monies received under this Agreement or assets acquired with
funds provided under this Agreement which are not used for or do not
continue in use for a County-approved landfill abatement project
shall be repaid or returned to the County.
8. Subsequent Payment Schedule and Annual Reports. The County will
pay the Municipality subsequent grants according to such policies as
may be adopted by the County for such years. The County agrees to
adopt its policies by August 1 of the preceding year and to execute
such amendments to this Agreement as are necessary to implement such
policies.
Progress reports and Annual Reports for subsequent years shall
be submitted at the times and in the form prescribed herein, or as
otherwise agreed.
The Municipality understands that the County's allocation to the
Municipality under this Agreement for subsequent years will be
dependent upon availability to the County of surcharge collections
pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 115A.919 and other sources available for
landfill abatement activities.
9. Access to Records/Audits.
A. �The�County shall have full access to all records relating to the
performance of this Agreement.
B. The Municipality agrees to maintain records relating to the
terms of this Agreement, and shall retain all such documentation for
three years following the last date in which payment was received
from the County under the terms of- this Agreement or following the
termination of this Agreement, whichever is later. Such records
shall be made available for audit or inspection at any time upQn
request of the County or� its authorized representative. The
Municipality agrees to provide access to the project site(s), if
any, at reasonable hours. The Municipality shall maintain records
sufficient to show that all funds received under this Agreement were
expended for Landfill Abatement Purposes�in accordance with Minn.
Stat. § 115A.919 and• this Agreement. The Municipality agrees to
provide any information that is not readily available within a
reasonable period of time. All expenses incurred by the examining
authority shall remain a cost of such authority. -
10. Property Distribution. Assets acquired in whole or in part with
funds provided under this Agreement shall be the property of the
Municipality. If this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Paragraph
19 herein, assets acquired in whole or in part with funds provided
Page 4 of 7
under this Agreement shall be the property of the Municipality so
long as said assets are used by the Municipality for the purposes of
landfill abatement. •
11. Acknowledgment of Countv Financial Assistance. The Municip.ality
shall provide the following acknowledgment on all. promotional
materials, reports and publications relating to the activities
described in its Funding Application.
This activity, progxam, publication funded in part by
the Dakota County Board of Commissioners' Solid Waste
Enterprise Fund.
12. Hold Harmless. The Municipality and the County agree to
indemnify and hold each other harmless from any claims, demands,
actions or causes of action arising out of any act or omission on
the part of their respective commissioners, officers, agents,
servants or employees associated with activities pursued under the
terms of this Agreement.
Each party to this Agreement shall be liable for its own acts
and the results thereof to the extent authorized�by law and shall
not�be responsible for the acts of the other party, its'officers,
employees and agents, Liability of the County or other Minnesota
pol�tical subdivisions shall be governed by the provisions of the
Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 466 and other applicable
laws.
13. Assignment/Subcontracting. The Municipality shall be
responsible for the performance of all subcontracts and shall ensure
that' all subcontractors .perform fully the terms of the
subcontract. Any agreement between the Municipality and any
subcontractor shall obligate the subcontractor to comply with the
terms of this Agreement.
14. Compliance With Requirements of the Law. The Municipality
agrees to comply with all federal, state, and local laws or
ordinances, and all applicable rules, regulations, and standards
established by any agency of such governmental units, which are now
or hereafter proinulgated insofar as they relate to the
Municipality's activities under the,provisions of this Agreement.
15. Egual Employment Opportunitv. In all activities related to the
terms of this Agreement, the Municipality agrees to comply with all
federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and
executive orders pertaining to unlawful discrintination on account of
race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status,
status with regard to public assistance, disability or age.
16. Severability. The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed
severable. If any part of this Agreement is rendered void, invalid,
or unenforceable,•such rendering shall not affect the validity and
enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement unless the part or
parts which are void, invalid or otherwise unenforceable
Page 5 of 7
substantially impair the value of the entire Agreement with respect
to either party. The parties further agree, if reasonable, to
substitute for the invalid provisions a valid provision that most
closely approximates the economic effect and intent of the invalid
provision.
17. Entire Agreement. It is understood'and agreed that the entire
Agreement is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all
oral and written agreements and negotiations between the parties
relating to the subject matter hereof. _
18. Amendments. Any amendments, alterations, variations,
modifications, or waivers of this Agreement shall be valid only when
they have been reduced to writing, duly signed by the parties. .
19. Termination. The County or the Municipality may terminate this
Agreement, with or without cause, by giving written notice to the
County Administrator for the County and to the Chairperson of the
official governing body of the Municipality, at least 60 days before
the effective date of termination. The County and the Municipality
also may terminate this Agreement by mutual written agreement. The
Agreement will automaticall� terminate at the end of any current
term if a funding application for the following year has not been
submitted by the Municipality and approved by the County Board.
20. Effect.of Termination. Termination of this Agreement shall not
discharge any liability, responsibility or right of any party which
arises �from the performance of or failure to�adequately perform the
terms of this Agreement prior to the effective date of
termination. Nor shall termination discharge any obligation which
by its nature would survive after the date of termination, including
by way of illustration only and not limitation, the obligation of
the Municipality to reimburse the County for funds under paragraph
7.
Page 6 of 7
h �
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Agreement to be duly executed.
Approved as to farm:
- -- - � � / �`��
A�sistant County AttorneyJDate
Approved as to execution:
Assistant County AttarneyjDate
Appraved by �akota Courity
Board Resolu�ion No. ���
Dakota County Attorney�s Office
�akota Caunty Judicial Center
1560 West Highway 55
Fiastings, MN 55033
Telephone: (612) 438-4438
C/K-92-2
parties hereto� have caused this
COUNTY OF DAKOTA
By . .
Donald R. Chapdelaine, Chair
Board of Commissioners
Date of Signature
Attest ' ' •
Norma•Marsh, Auditar
Date af Signature
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Date of Signature
A'�test
, City Clerk
Date of Signaiure
Page 7 af 7
ATTACHMENT 1
1992 LANDFILL ABATEMENT FQNDING APPLICATSON
Gity/Totrmship: Menda�a Heights Date Submitted: ��Ptember� �].7, 1991' �
Address: 110i victoria Curve program Periad: . 1/1/92 to
Mendaia Heights, MN 55118 1.2/32/92
I. If this is a multi-community project, please list all
participating comtaunities and the lead community or agency for
the project, and attach a capy af the Joint Powers Agreement.
fihraugh 1991r Mendota Hea.ghts participated in s�absid5.zing the Goodwill Drbp C1ff
Center with the cities of Sou�Gh S�. Paul, West St. Paul'and In''ver Grove Heights.
Beginning in 1992, Gaodwill wi1Z contract directly with Daka�a Coizn'ty.
II. Please provide a brief averview of 1.992 abatement activities;
indicate whether these are a continuatian of existing programs j
e�ansion of existing programs; or new programs: (If more
space is aneeded u�e extra sheets.)
Promote increased participation in curbside recycling program and multi-family
program thraugh promational campaign and educational assistance.
Coordinate aommercial/industrial recycl.ing with Dako�a County and pzovide tech-
niaal and edttcational li.aisoa assistance to Mendota Fieights businesses.
Assist funding a ful]. time staff person, 25 peraent aF whose ti,me will be
devoted to recycling.
Continue in-hause City Ha21, E'.ire �Ia31, Public Works Garage.recyali.ng oE office
paper, newspaper and alumi.num cans.
Backyard composting seminar in conjunction with Arbor Day i.n April and passible
oampos�.ing ordinance implemented.
Cooperation with County an communi�y ora.ented components af solid waste programs.
1-1
, . �
0
to a community exceed the amount shown on Attachment 4: Maximum
Reimbursement Schedule - 3992_
Based upon the Community Annual Report, the Manitaring Reports and the
formula outlined belaw, a final evaluatian af each cammunity�s
performance wi11 be made. Th� performance results iar the year will
be used ta adjust the �econd quarter payment of the fallowing year, if
required. Dakata County rese.rves the right to request documentation
for inforntation submitted. �
o Met a 16o residential aba�.ement �75 pts
goal {4.69 points per 1a of waste
abated}. �nly 25% of tonnage used to
calculate may be yardwaste. •
o Conducted promotianal program as autlined 25 pts
in applicat.ion and appraved by the County.
Adjustments to community ,payments wi1.1 be based upon the foll.owing
Perfarmance-Based Funding Schedule:
"50 pts, - 50a of net eligible casts reimbursed
51-75 pts = 75n af net eiigible costs reimbursed
76-90 pts - 90� o�f net eligible casts reimbursed
91-100 pts = 1000 of net eligible costs reimbursed
Net eligible costs means praject costs after deducting:
- - Other grants received for the project
- Revenues from the sale of recyclable materials.andfor
campost.
III. Complete the following section for all applicable activities,
whether a continuation or expansion of existing activities or
new activities for 1992:
A. Curbside Collection of Recyclables:
l. Number of households to be served: 3,410
2. Frequency of collection: eekly bi weekly other
3. Number of Residential Recycling Haulers: Eight Licensed Haulers
4. Materials collected (circle all that apply):
ewspaper mixed paper food cans
everage cans glass plastic used oil
magazines orrugated cardboard�
other (specify)
6. Expected abatement from curbside: 1,000 tons
B. Drop off'Centers for Recyclable Materials:
l. For each drop-off center please provide:
a. Opez'ator: Goodwill/Easter Seals
Addr'ess • 1425 S. Robert Street
Days/Hours of Operation: Mon -�ri 8 am - 8 pm sat 9'- 5 sun 12 -�
Materials Collected • Glass � and aluminum beverage cans, corrugated
�ca'rdboard, clothing, newspaper, household items
and nlastic containers.
b. Operator:
Address:
Days/Hours of Operation:
Materials Collected:
2. Expected abatement from Drop Offs: loo tons
' 1-2
9
�. Multi Family Recycling
l. Total number of units served: 333
2. Total number of buildings served: 4 complexes with a total of 7 building:
3. Frequency of collection/collection method(s) used
(description) : Weekly collection. Haulers provide containers.
4. Materials collected (Circle all that apply)�
newsprint � mixed paper used oil
food Cans beverage cans glass.
plastics magazines other
corrugated cardboard
5. Expected abatement from multi family units: 10o tons
D_ Yard Was�e Program
l. Please provide a brief description of the community's �
role in yard waste collection.
Publicize backyard composting. Compos�ing ordinance regulating proger
procedures. Promote County transfer station in Eagan.
2. Drop off: (Complete the following only if this is a
community owned/operated yard waste collection site)
- . Location:�
Hours: . • . �
Fees:
3. Expected yard waste abatement in 1992
(curbside/dropoff): tons
E: Describe any commercial/industrial recycling activities you will
undertake in 1992 (this is not a required program).
Provide technica�/educational assistance in cooperation with
Dakota County. Provide desktop containers for Mendota Heights .
businesses to recycle office paper. �
1-3
�
F. Describe program specific public education/promotional activities
that will be undertaken in 1992.
- residential: a minimum of one written communications must
be sent �to each household in 1992.
After new 1992 materials are established,�.a brochure explaining recycling -
prog�am anr3 .ai.l:i.mate�ials sen� tb . eaeh;.household.
One page of every City newsletter, published quarterly, devoted to recycling:
Periodical recycling flyers to all households.
- institutional (schools): a minimum of 4 presentations must
be made in schools in 1992.
Provide a minimum of four presentations to ISD-197 schools and private schools :�
in Mendota Heights.
- commercial/industrial
Publicize availability��of desktop containers.
�
�
G. Describe your in-house recycling/procurement program.
City Hall has desktop recycling program with 100 percent participation by
staff.
Alumi.num and metal can recycling available in all municipal buildings, as
is newspaper and glass.
IV. Work P2an
Dakota County will distribute any approved funding in two
equal payments, provided communities meet specified
development objectives. Please provide a work gl'an for 1992
and highlight the objectives to be met by the following dates:
o June 15 Complete 3 educational semi.nars
o December 31 Complete one educational seminar�
Mail City wide brochure.
1-4
V. Budget
Adruinistrative Costs:
Direct Salarie
Direct Mileage
Promotion Education:
Printing
• Distribution
Other Costs:
TOTAL:
�
January 1, 1992 to December 31, 1992.
County Community
Reimbursement -Share
s 4, 620 5, 7.50
200
2;000
6,820
Total
10,370
2,000
5,750 12,370
Requested Funding $ 6, 820
From County**:
* Unexpended 1991 funds may not be carried over to 1992
** Request may not exceed that amount shown on
the Maximum Reimbursement Schedule - Attachment 4
1-5
ATTACHMENT 4
MAXIMUM REIMBURSEMENT SCHEDULE - 1992
CITY
Apple Valley
Burnsville
Eagan
Farmington
Hastings
Inver Grove Heights
Lakeville
Mendota Heights
Rosemount�
South St. Paul
West St. Paul
Mendota
Lilydale
Sunfish Lake
RSWC (19 entities)
TOTAL:
1990
Households*
11,538
20,244
18,450
2,124
5,545
8,149
8,105
3,410
2,866
8,294
8,767
77
342
144
4,652
102,707
Proposed
1992 Level:
$2.00 Per
Household
$ 23,076
40,488
36,900
4,248
11,090
16,298
16, 210
6,820
5,732
16,588
17,534
1,154
1,684
1,288
$ 28,304
$227,502
* 1991 housing units from Metropolitan Council based on 1990
census, subject to revisions by Dakota County.
N:gp-abate
0
STATE OF MINNE80TA }
COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) s.s.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS}
I, Kathleen M. Swan�on, being the duly appointed and
acting City C2erk of the City of Mendata xeights, do hereby
CERTIFY that the attached Re�alution No. 91-69, "A
Resolution Seeking Funding From Dakata County Far
Continuation of Community Landfill Abatement Program," is a
true and exact capy af said original resolution on file in
my office.
Signed and sealed by hand this 18th day of September, 1991.
( SEAL}
�
�
.r' �"�..`:�c.L �G'Lt -r•�-�a-..� .,��
�thleen M. Swanson
Gity Clerk
�
� ; .
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Dakata County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 91-69
A RESOLIITION SEERING FUNDINC FROM DAKOTA COUNTY FOR
CONTINUATiQN t?F Ct?MMUNITY LANDFILL ABATEMENT PRt?GRAM
WHEREAS, the Minnesota State LegisZature has mandated that
communities in the metropalitan area must implement reaycling
programs in order ta reduce the valume of waste being taken for
burial in landfills; and
AHEREAB, Dakota County has adopted a solid waste master plan
which se�s goals and targets for the accomplishment of �olid waste
recycling goals in each community in the county; and
WHEREAS, Dakota County provides the local cammunities wa.th
grant funding for implementatian and maintenance of local cammunity
recycling programs; and
WHEREAB, The City of Mendota Heights ha� participa�ed
faithfull� and successfully in the Community Landfill Abatement
Program a,n 1989, 1990, and 1991 and will continue to part�icipate in
1992.
NOW THEREFORE BE ST RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights that the City Council. does hereby transmit the
attached 1992 funding appliaation, seeking funds in the amount of
$6j820 for solid waste abatement in 1992.
Adopted by �he City Counci.l of the City of Mendota Heights
this 27th day af Septeatber, 1992.
ATTEST:
.fGl ti���..,-��--
thleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
CITY C{}UNCIL
GITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
$y ,�'.,�.� � ,�t.�.:L�"�
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
Mendota Heights Police Department
MEMOR�7DUM
February 13, 1992
TO: Mayor and City Coun il
City Administr��
FROM: Chief of Police '��v
SUBJECT: Computer Printer Purchase
�M ;•. •,
The police department requests permission to purchase a Laserwriter IIg
computer printer from Apple Computer, Inc. for $3,219.00.
'� ��K������
Several years ago we budgetted to replace our laserprinter in 1992 for
$2,600.•00. During the ensuring years, the price has gone up and new and
1IRproved products have been introduces. Today, the cost of Apple's top of the
line printer (Laserwriter IIg) which was just introduced in December, 1991, is
$3,219.00. This compares to the retail cost of $4,599.00. Our capital
operating budget has come in under budget in squad purchases and in emergency
light bar purchases; therefore, the additional $600.00 that is needed is
available. In addition, we will be selling several of our old computers and
our existing lazerwriter, and will realize some extra money there.
The existing laserwriter is producing poor results and can no longer be
brought to acceptable standards.
That Council approve the purchase of a Laserwriter IIg computer printer from
Apple Computer under the state contract at a cost not to exceed $3,220.00.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
February 13, 1992
. /,�. �
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminisk4"1�"�
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer
SUBJECT: Workman's Compensation Insurance Premium
DISCIISSION
On May 1, 1990, the City chose to participate in an optional
program for computing our Workman's Compensation Insurance premium.
this was the first time that the program, which is claims based,
within limits of maximum exposure, was offered.
We have now been audited for the policy year ending May 1,
1991, and have received a refund of $18,864 for the policy year.
As suggested at the time the option was chosen, the refund has
been placed in an Insurance Reserve Account to protect against a
year we might have substantial claims.
For the year 1990/91, we paid a discounted standard premium of
$58,175. Our ma.ximum exposure was $82, 884 and the minimum $27, 342.
We have again chosen the option premium for the year 1991/92.
ACTION REQIIIRED
None. This is for information only.
LES:kkb
Mendota Heights Police Department
�S??BB�UM
Date: 13 February, 1992
To: Mayor and City Co cil
City Administ t
From: Police Chief
Subject: 1992 Marked Squad Cars
�NTRODUCTION
The Police Department requests permission to purchase two Chevrolet
Caprice Police Package vehicles to replace two 1990 marked squads.
DISCUSSION
Council approved $28,000 in the 1992 budget for the replacement of two
1990 squad cars. As always, we participate in the State and County bids
for squads. This years award was made to Polar Chevrolet in White Bear
Lake with a base price of $12,924 each.
RFrn�rmnmTn*r
That Council authorize the Police Department to order two (2) 1992
Chevrolet Caprice police vehicles from Polar Chevrolet pursuant to State
Contract M-3551. The cost of both vehicles, including the equipment
changeover and graphics is not to exceed the budgeted amount of $28,000.
c ,.
R
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
February 14, 1992
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administrat
SUBJECT: Federal Cable Television Legislation
INTRODIICTION
Attached please find a letter from Ms. Holly Yerigan,
Executive Director of the Northern Dakota County Cable
Communications Commission (NDC-4), regarding pending Federal
Legislation affecting the cable television industry. NDC--4 has
requested the City to contact House Representatives Vento and
Sikorski to express our support for one of the subject Bills,
HR3560.
DISCIISSION
The topic of cable industry re-regulation has been receiving
a great deal of attention this year. From the birth of the cable
industry to 1984, governmental units enjoyed some ability to
regulate the activities (primarily cable rates) of cable television
providers, similar to any other utility which utilizes public
rights of way.
In 1984, Fecleral Legislation deregulated the cable industry,
and Cities lost their ability to oversee many aspects of cable
service delivery, includi.ng rates. In response, cable rates in
northern Dakota County rose from $10.95 per month in 1986 to $22.40
per month in 1992.
NDC-4 believes HR3560 will help stimulate competition in the
cable television industry, thereby helping to curb the upward
pressure on cable rates. In addition, the Bill has the support of
the National League of Cities, the United States Conference of
Mayors, the National Association of Counties, the National
Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors, the Cable
Federation of America and the Wireless Cable Association.
ACTION REQIIIRED
If Council concurs with the recommendation of NDC-4, a motion
should be made authorizing the Mayor to sign the attached letters
to Representatives Vento and Sikorski asking them to co-sponsor
HR3560.
MTL:kkb
F'
NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE
COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
, � 1535 Livingston, Suifie 101
West St. Paul, Minnesota 55118-3411
612/450-9891 rAX 612/450-9429
February 10, 1992
The Honorable Charles Mertensotto
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Mayor:
On behalf of the NDC4 I am writing to request your active support of H.R. 3560,
"The Cable Consumer Protection Act of 1991."
The NDC4 requested your support on this item late last fall, and is asking you
once more to contact Representatives Vento and Sikorski and ask them to
cosponsor H.R. 3560. I have just received a letter from Representative Ramstad
who has recently cosponsored H.R. 3560. According to reliable sources, this bill
and H.R. 1303 will be considered for mark up in the next 3-4 weeks.
H.R. 3580 is the only pending bill that is supported by the USCM, NLC, NATOA,
MACTA, and the Consumer Federation of America. Local elected officials do have
an influence in Washington, and for that reason, we are asking you to write or
call Representatives Vento and Sikorski and ask them to cosponsor H.R. 3560.
Although Representative Sikorski does not serve our district, he is on the House
Subcommittes on Telecommunications and it is important to solicit his support.
Enclosed is a sample letter that you can use to write these representatives.
Also enclosed is a cable television legislative and regulatory update that
provides background information on the bills pending befo�e Congress. Senate
Bill 12 passed 73 to 18 last Friday, and while it does not go far enough, is a
step in the right direction. An article from "Multichannel News" is enclosed
which provides an update on the amendments that were made to S.12.
This letter is being copied to your NDC4 cable representatives and to your city
administrator/clerk. We will provide your city administrator/clerk�with copies
of the enclasures and the addresses of Representatives Vento and Sikorski.
The Honorable Charles Mertensotto
February 10, 1992
Page 2
If I can answer any questions you have regarding H.R. 3560 or other cable-related
issues, please feel f ree to contact me and I will be happy to discuss them with
you.
Si cerely,
�
Ho . y Yeri gan
Executive Director
/J
Encs.
cc: ✓fom Lawell, City Administrator
Ron Rogosheske
Jill Smith
MULTICHANNEL NEWS February 3, 1992
Vol. 13, �o. 5
�
BUT AITI�RNATI VE ,M�'ASUI�� LAND� 35 Y�AS
.�.__, -
By JE.ANNINE AVERSA
ASHINGTON --
The cable industry
suffered a blaw last
Friday morning
when ttze Senate
passed S i2 in a 73-1$ vate and re-
jected a lcss onerous, stripped-
dowu ait�rnative bill.
In the cnd, the Senate adopted
more than a dazen new ameud-
ments to S IZ, but key provisians
in the bill, notably those coveriag
rate regulatzon, progtam a�ss and
anti-disciiminadon, and retransmis-
sian cansent remained intact.
A less onerous alternative
Package tliat was lxing peddled by
the cable iudustry, a coalitian af
Dcmocrats and Republicans aad
tht Bush administration was rejoct
ed by tha Senate in a 3S-54 votc.
Broadcasters were rejoicing
over their seif-praciaimed victary,
wi�e cable executives chose w fa
cus instead un thc sslver iining thcy
saw in thc 35 votes the aIternative
mcasure attract�d.
Those 3S votas, they c�ncurred,
signal that lawm��lcers iu the Hatue
may be wiiling to cansider a morc
moderatG approach to cable re-r�g-
ulation.
But some cable executives
poiated �ingers af blame, notiag
that many key MSO executives
were not on the scene doing what
they couid ta drum up more sug-
port for the alternacive measure.
"For the majarity of the MSO
executives to be on a baat in the
Canbbean [on Home Box Office's
annuat }unket], shows yau how fat
this industry has become," said
one MSQ exeeutive who did not
want to 6e identified.
Fingers of blame aside, industry
execucives agreed that atthougii ca
ble had not defeated S 12, it had
gained ground in tht battle,
"The strength of the substitute
means that our mission was ac-
camplished and that we shalt iive
to fight another day," said James
uThe stre�gth of the
subs�i�ute means
that our� mission
was accompiished�
and. thafi we shal!
live to fight another
n-
� • • :
.xaur�ss Moor:s�r.�
... . .. . .. . - ...- .. . :��.
Mooney, president of the National
Cablc Television .Association.
Maoney said that whila it was
unfortunate t6at the Senate passcd
such an "extreme bill," which ho
callaci a"strange vision of con-
sumer protection," he was more
than plcased by the suengtir af the
votes for the substiarte --- 37 by
the NGTA's head coun�
(Althaugh 3'7 senators voted for
the substitute, twa votes were not
caunted in the fiaai tally becaase
they were paired with othcr absGnt
seaators who vated no.)
"This thing has a iong way yet
to go, including a potendal veto,
and it's up ta us to redaubls our cf-
SEE SENATE, PAGE 41
CONTINUEU I'ROM PAG� 1
foris in Qie Hause to see Qi1t the extreme bil!
daes not prevaii," Mooney reiter�tetl.
Cable executives, in general, echoed
Mooi�ey's outlttc�k. F'�tcoi� Cabte TV cl�aer-
m�n Mt�rc Nath�nson asserted, "U this bill
is not cl��nged drasnatically in tl�e !louse c�r
conference committee, White Hoase sources
h�ve assured me it will definitely be veloed."'
Nathznso�i ttdded tiyat "tl�e Busti �td:irinis-
traticm, nnd i say Ihis lo you t�� :► Ucmcicril,
t��iderslatids tl�c shaliow��ess c�� tl�is l�ill .��sct
tliat it is nat a cansumer bill."
John f�lendricks, ch�irn�an of Tl�e Discov-
ery Channel, noted ti�at S t2 came aut ai
cotnmiltee with a 16-3 vote. Bul of those 16
senators, just i2 voted i�i favor af S 12 on
the tloor. Hendricks said tii�►t indicntes that
cable lalabyists have built at least same mo-
tt�entum.
Many cable executives said ths�t if S 12
were tc� becosne lnw, i�ew c:�hte ��rc�gram-
irii�ig services woulci be it:� first victiirr.
"Revenues that otherwise would be spent on
cable progra�nming and custc�mer service
improvements instead would be expended
on broadcasi �etransmissian fees �nc! regu-
latory �roceedings," said Rabert Sachs, se-
nior vice president of corporate and legal af-
i'airs far Continentat Ca6levision.
Meanwhile, Wall Street analysts were not
pushing the panic button over the passage of
S 12. "Thirty-�ve voles means that the ob-
jective was met, will signal to the White
Hause that a veto of any bitt resembling S
12 could be [sustainedJ," said Bear, Sterns
& Ca. ariaiyst Ken Goldrnan. "A��y ullimate
bill that gets enacted into law this yelr is
probably going ia be a co:npromise."
But Bob Schmidt, president of the Wire-
less Cable Associatian, was not reading as
much inta the tea leaves. 'i'he 35 voles,
Schmidt says, are not critical to the re�l, fina)
issues. "I don't believe their strategy ta bal-
ster a White Hause ihat has threatenecl a veto
af this legislation impresses rne, because I
think more and more peopte reaiize fi�is is
truly a r mer issue."
Not unexpectedly, nn ebullient
Eddie FriEts, gresiclent at the N�-
.tional t�ssciciatic�n afi t3ro�dcasters,
c
issued a stntement s7ying, "The
Senate iias t<iken a giant tenp tc�-
ward cnsuN�ing lhe Icmg-tenn vitihil-
iry c�i' universa! tY�e, c�ver-tire-�iir
tctevision. 'i'his is ;t grc�t victory
Ryr broadc�sters nnd cottsumers:'
F�it#s' re�i�arks echoed Ct)Tii-
menls ms�dc csrrlicr Ix►�l wcck by
5ttlliC SCpQIIC pt't1�}i?IiCiliS ttE S 12
during the deb�te.'t'hey c�tied the
allernalive packttge an a�ttempt to
gut tiieir E�i1L'I'i�e atternative, tlaey
said, wauld da nothing for con-
Sui»ers or ft�r ciieckit�g tfie cable
inclustry's tnarket power.
Sen. liaw�rd Metzenbaum (n-
Ohio} said the �titernative si�oulci he
c.illed "the Cnble "Ielcvisicm
Mca»c�pc�iy M<ii�ile�i�i�icc tict:'
Ccnnmunily Antcnnn'Iclevixion
Associ�tion pra5iclent Steve Effros
cnuiitereci th�t S l2 is the "Brc�ad-
Rate Rebate Bill Will Resur�a�e
r �SH[NGTUN — A prvvisivn that would allow
I��Q�e Feclernl Commanications Cotnmissian to order
refunds to cAbte snbscrit�ers af overcharges when
rates are deemed "unreasonnble" by the agency wiil be in-
cluded in a bill to reauthorize the FCC.
Sen. Howard Matzenbaum (D-{)hio) prepared ta of%r
such an amendment to cnble bill S 12 last Thursday. But
Meizei�baurn snid he withdrew the item niter learning thaE
Senate communicntians subcommittee chaitman Danfel In-
ouye (D-Hawaii), wha oversees FCC reauthorizatiori leg-
istation� wiU stick the refund pmvision inta the FCC budget
bill.
Under S l2. the FCC has the authoreEy to regalate rates
beyond the bnsic service tier only if, aRer having teceived
a cotnplaint frai�i a subscriber, the �gehcy deteriiiines the
rate to be "u��reasonable."
The bill leaves it to the �CC to decide what canstitules
nn snreflson�ble rz�te, Aa �CC budget bill will tse affered
11ter lhis year, ■
c�filing BAilout Bill of 1992."
Witi� Se��ate action compteted, the spot-
light now lums ta the Flause, which h1s two
major cable re-regulation bills pendi»g con-
sideration by the telecotnmunications sub-
cammittee.
tJne of the biiis, affered E�y subcommittee
ch�innan Edward Markey (D-Mass.), is less
h�rsh th�n S l2* while a�iatlrer, affered by
Reps. Dennis �ckart (D-Ohio) And Jim
Coaper (D-Tenn.), is more in line witl�.S t2.
iate tast Fnday afternoan, Markey said iie
inlends to �chedule a �yra�kup of c�ble leg-
istation witiiin four to six weeks.
Sotne sources believe t{ie cable industry
wiU try ta slrike a compromise in the I louse,
wl�ere tlie re-regutatiUn issac h�s g�ined iess
momenlum and has fnilcd lo pick up
widespread su�port ��nt�ng key Republicans
who oversee communications policy.
Unless the Hause were to p:�ss a bill iden-
tical to tire Senate's (whict� congressionu)
saurces doubt at this paint), chances ArF
nny package passed by the House� whekher
it wns a cabte-desigaed und adtninistrutian-
backed com�rotnise or not, would head into
a conference cotnmittee.
The conference committee would work io
resolve di(Terences in the two bills, a process,
sources say, ia which �riylheng c�rn happen.
Eacl� chamber then votes on the committee's
product.
AMENUMENTS TO S 12
tiiterest'rngly, two of the amendments
ndopted ta S 12 c�me fram the allerntttive
measure. Sen. Sl�de Gortan's (R-Wash.}
Amendments would expand the Cable Acfs
rural exemptian waiver so that telephone
comp�nies coatcl �utamuticaliy bniid c�bte
systems in ureas nf IU,UUp peaple And pro-
t�ibit cities fron� grnnticrg exclusive cable
franchises.
Olher important amendments adapted
were ones from Sen. Trent Latt (R-Miss.)
that would allow cable operators to itemize
franchise fees and ather regulatary
costs; Patrick Leahy {D-Vt.) that
would require cable convertor boxes
to be more user-friendly; and Gorton.
One Gorton atnendment woatd pra-
I�ibit cttble operators and programmers
fram using negativs-option marketing
and a�iother would t�equire aperators to
assign customers personal identiftca-
tion nurobers to access their accoonts
s�nd safeguArd their privacy.
Set�. D�siiet Inonye (D-Huwaii} sve-
cessfully offered Amendments that:
would give the FCC the authoriry to
make sure that retransmission consent
does not lead to "unreasonable" rate
increases; and encourage the carriage
of minority programming on cable
systems.
Sen. Jesse Helms (R-IV.C.) got
through �n atnendment that would al-
lnw cnbte aper�tors to reject the car-
ringe of sexu�lly explicit pmgrnmming
an leased-access chunne3s, require op-
erator� to p1Ace such pmgramming an
a single channel and to block the channel un-
tess a subscriber reques#s atherwise.
Another successful Helms amendment
wauld reqnire cable operatats to notify sub-
scribers when unsoticited X-rated, R-rated
and NC-l7-rated movies are being provided
ta thern fcee of chaige as part af a promatian.
Subscribers would be given the right to re-
quest ihat the channel be bIocked.
The Senatc also adopted an amendment
from Sen. Jahn Breaua (D-I,a.) that doesn't
fonce cabte operators to carry hame shopping
stations as part of their must-carry obliga-
tions under the bill.
Sen. Bob Graham (D-Fla.)� whose state is
the headquarters af Home Shopping Net-
work, objected ta Bteaux's amendment. Gra-
hum managed to get a provision tacked onto
the Breaux amendment to have the FCC de-
temiine whether home shopping stations are
eligible #'or must-carry status. ■
Jo7m M. Niggirrs and Rac7iel W. Thomp-
son con�ributed to tlti� v
,
February 19, 1992
The Honorable Bruce Vento
House of Representatives
2304 Rayburn Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Representative Vento:
I am writing to urge you to co-sponsor H.R. 3560, the "Cable
Consumer Protection Act of 1991", that was introduced by
Representative Dennis Eckart (D-Ohio). The bill has recently been
cosponsored by Representative Jim Ramstad, Third District,
Minnesota.
The cable subscribers in the City of Mendota Heights have
experienced five rate increases since the Communications Policy Act
of 1984 was enacted. Cable rates have risen from $1.0.95 in
December 1986, the month rates were deregulated, to $22.40 today,
an increase of more than 105 percent. Yet, Cities have little
authority under federal law to curb such rate increases and to
respond to other customer service concerns. We believe that H.R.
3560, if enacted, would stimulate competition in the cable
television industry, while giving local governments the interim
authority they need to protect cable subscribers from unfair rate
increases and other abuses by cable operators.
H.R. 3560 is the only cable television bill pending before
Congress that local government, consumer organizations, and
potential competitors to cable operators, agree will resolve
current competitive and customer service problems in the cable
industry. The bill has the support of the National League of
Cities, the United States Conference of Mayors, the National
Association of Counties, the National Association of
Telecommunications Officers and Advisors, the Consumer Federation
of America and the Wireless Cable Association. We hope that you
will join this broad-based coalition in favor of H.R. 3560 by
becoming a cosponsor.
Thank you for your
H.R. 3560 on behalf of
Mendota Heights.
CEM:kkb
attention. We hope you will support
the cable consumers in the City of
Sincerely,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
�
February 19, 1992
The Honorable Gerry Sikorska.
House of Representa�.ives
403 Cannan 4ffice Building
Washington, D.C, 20515
Dear Representative Sikarski:
I am writing to urge yau to co-spansor H.R. 3560, the "Cable
Cansumer Protection Act of 1991", that was in.troduced by
Represen�.ative Dennis Eckar�. (D-Ohio). The bil.l has recen�ly been
cosponsored by Representa�ive Jim Rams�.ad, Third Distrzct,
�Minnesota.
The cable subscribers in the City o� Mendo�.a xeights have
experienced �ive rate increa�es since the Communications Policy Act
of 3.984 was enacted. Cab1e rates have risen �rom $10.95 in
December 1986, the month ra�.es were deregulated, ta $22.40 today,
an increase af more than 145 percent. Yetj Cities have little
authority under federal iaw to curb such rate increases and to
respand Go other customer service concerns. We believe that H.R.
3560, if enacted, wauld stimulate competition in the cable
television industry, while giving l.ocal governments the interim
authority they need ta protect ca.ble subscribers from unfair rate
increase� and other abu�es by cable operators.
H.R. 3560 is the only cab7.e televisian bill pending be�ore
Congress that local gavernment, constuner organizations, and
potential competitors to cable operators, agree wi1.1 resolve
current competitive and cu�tomer �ervice problem� in the cable
indu�try. The bill has the support af �he National League af
Cities, the United States Conference of Mayors, the National
Association of Coun�ies, the National Association of
Telecommunications Officers and Advisors, �he Gonsumer Federa�ion
of America and the Wireless Ca.b1e Association. We hope that you
will join this broad-based coalition in favor o� H.R. 3560 by
becoming a cosponsor.
Thank you far your
H.R. 3560 on behalf of
Mendota Heights.
CEM:kkb
attention. We hope you will support
the cabl.e consumers in the City of
Sincerely,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
! i •• •• ! : ••••i ! i
February 1$, 1992
Asphalt License
Northwes�. Asphal�, In.c.
Masonry License
Neuharth Companies, Inc. .
Excavating Li.censes
Rehbein, Glenn-Excavating, Inc.
Scher�f, Inc.
Gas Piping Licenses
Arnesan, Ear]. Jr.-Htg. & A/C
Conway Mechanical.
Dependabl.e Indoor Air Quality
R.H. Heating
valley Pl.umbing Co., Inc.
General Gant. License
Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Co. (Fire Prot. Install.)
Heatin & Air Conditioning Licenses
Arnesan, Earl Jr.-Htg. & AfC
Conway Mechanical
Ron's Mechanical, Inc.
Sa.gn Erecting License
SignArt Co., Inc.
a
. '_ ''
t
t
I
f
i
�
February 18, Z992
TO: Mayor and City Counci2
CLAIMS LIST SUdfMARY:
TotaZ CZaims
Significant CZaimc
Barr Engr Impr proj
Baerd Water Corr� "
NorthernState Power Gas & electric
Zieger Parts & repairs
Unusual Claims
Business,Recor�s Votine Booths
Dakota County TVI 92 Police training
Eaton Wood Prodacts F. D. office eg
Station 19, Arch fees
< . I
'•P,� �i.•: ' iio� �•�i:E ;�:•: ;•� d �•r
:;r: :,�: :,a:i;'iE>a•,... '.S•2i:°�i.
�'J~y f �.t2S.'�c .t�� a i: :'1�� +c',i�%j� �?G.. �{ �,,r �.�..
�., ':`�;�, '�e4�.r� .�� '�H .t '��:.cv�;:+::ti��K�' ':;4• •t:: K;1�:5:.�+;:�'Ck`
: t;tg:.i:�.., a �'�.g.^y.. , y� ;:^;-.: 'Y' ' �.<,v�+• � �- s'<,;;t ; q.,'^�'�•, ti ,c„ '' `q;.`>t
-�s��;: :�. 2' ::�Y�:�+;^'�.��'.';> .n��'�•':�;5 K�e� �c' .r:t�'�,'i��Y.�;L� K'J;t[i•^." 4`�
. t�.�i,�^,:•^i � °:tit M, t� �i;c � •y` �'1; ' .:;5, - • :?.. �; : ,,:.�r,: a :._ . .ta.: '• K it3'.:•,;;.'1
: 4. .,,� � � tiy.. ��: '::t•�:� %,i�t. : Yt �� 1: .•i.. �i:''�� `�' � �.�: j�::� i',:.n�:�}:.•', ,
�".:4` � _{: . �`f' , ' .. . ` . . ; a;:i;ti`.. . � $o- ;�::� •' . . . . . , , . . . ' �i.,�y+� : C%:._i :, �`�.Z::�t j
. , ' 2''�
\ ' . , . . i .
• ' � 1
. . - _ _ ' _ _ ..iS: . , ��.::;:.... , `
,. _ _ . .. . :a:. ' "' - , - -. . . . . , - . ,;
_ . _ _ _ _ . : y.,..,
' - - - `ti:- ' . - - , . . _ _ • .. . . � ' .z..t .
. � _ .�=;� • :._. ` _ - ,_ - ,- • �.. . �. -_ . • --. - ' - �- . - ' ' . ''.�', .
. . - •, i '
$ 63,092
5,081
5,593
7,753
4,682
2,722
3,625
1.982
6,995
�
'�,,-•--.... ._- - --- --- -- - - . _
��� 13 �eb . 2/18/92 Clairns List
---� Th�� 11:Sb AM Citv af Mendota Heiphts
j-��'-erafl--Gheek-Nurnber--- ----1
----'-- --- ---- —_.-------'------ --"_'
___ �.— -'---
i,�
.y
TernD.
��+---cne�k-_____._ ..�.-�---- - ---- - �-- -� --- --_.------- -------�----- --- �----- ---�-------- --�------------�-----
�5I N�un6er Vendc�r• Name Accaunt Cr_�de Camrnents
11
��; -1-E��3-F-flndersc�n--&-�Assc�c-----�Q9-4460-Q��Q�-0�1---- ---_-. --------_-_bike_trail_si.nns_.89=5D
��
E 1
�&�
J� T��-�is�'-erno-Cheek- Number -----•-----1--•-•---------_ ___ .� _. _. _
"i Terno Check Nurnber
�' = �
;jT _..__" '.._ . _._.- .�� .. �._..__."_""_.__"" ._..._"'__ __" "'" '_'"
�� 2 Albinsan 4�5-4.^_'rnLJ-LQ�J-SJ
f�"� 2 Albinscrr� 09-446�C-0@�-¢+Q�
-6� --�r3-ta3-�+sar, ---------.V. � _...�-.--.Qi5=43Q�5�=1 Q�5-1�, -- -----
I"i E
Dept 10-Adm
15-Engr
20-PoZice
30-Fire
40-CEO
_ Dept 50-Roads _ ___
60-IItiZities
70-Parks
80-PZanning
85-Recycling
__--�_90—Ani_ma1�Co.
—�'�.tad•s-a'-erno-Gbeck--N�unber _.__-�__�
Terno Check Nurnber 3
-'---�--SD1V5 - "..___ r
solys 89-6 E
_ ___._ s o 1 vs.-_. � �� __
izz
�23 3 Arnerican Toul S��ooly Inc 01-43@5-07Q+-7Q� solys
iZ� 3 Arneric�n Tac�l Sunoly Inc Q�S�`�FJnGJ��JQ�-JQ� solys
25 _ �_ � �_. ._ ..,__
�6 6
Z� ;; Totals Terno Check Nurnber 3
i�e .—__—_- - -- ------ —
Z9 Terno Check Number � 4
.. 30 ,.,a.,-,r�-o,; ..., rnq_v �
�--Ma��s .Ei9ID�(DQ0-00 n1Y5. A9-6E
F'aoe i
Arnc�unt - --
_�.-�3@
86. 30
18. 15 ^
343.75 _, _
_.6Z._5S _
�F��. JJ
1 Q�S. 27
iiJ.BnL
�21.07
31 4 Artsign M�tls - ,•0�-44�0-Q�00-@0 solys 89-6E � • � 61.85 ^ �
3Z ' ' 4, Artsign Matls ^ ^ w QrJ-1F3Q�S�IQ�J��J ' � solys • � • - � . . - " " 30, 94 ` � `
33 ' .k . � . . , . ,� � ..
34 12 13�. �1
35 Zc�tals Terno Check Nurnber 4
36
37 ' .. .. . . .. . . ' . _ .
� 3a ' yTernn Check Nurnber„ : . . _ ^ , 5 .. - ' .. ' � . ' ,( _ . <. � . •
u 39 � � .. , . ., , , w . '• , • ..
ao n c .� y `" l�i a�4�=sF�O-50 �� oart s
- 41 5 H& J Auta Supply Q�1-433Q�-490-5@ oarts
-42 S B& J Auta Suooly Q+1-4330-49Q-50 oarts
� „ � A�t-t� �a����• , ��=-43301►30-�D , parts
� - ' � 5 Ec � J �1uto Suoply � R'` '•. • 4+3-433�-49@-7@� � - " . Parts� - '� ` .'
• a5 , `� ,5. H & J Auto SuQpiy � . « . . . @1-4330-440-�@ •s - , , ' � - , > parts ~, , .
� � �t-�Et+o�3�, " �"=43�@�t�0-�0 aar"t�
47 S B t� J Auta Supply 01-4305-@5@-50 parts •
°� 5 P& J AutG Suoply 01-43@5-@7Q�-7Q parts
� �te �a���� 'S�►a@5-Q�60-6@ parts-
" 9 - _f.4 ,. S. S Rr J Auto Supply,' , - " •E . �. @1-4335=s10-5Q� � ',, , ' - a p�rts �`"` ,� . . � ,
` 50 xt � 5 P & J Auto Suppiy '� • � , • fli-433@-49�-5Q� ' ` • parts , _ ",�a�r`�
61 • .. . . . . . . .
6z 6�
y� 63
Totals Terno Check Number 5
4 64
6s ` Temn Check Nurnber . ' 6 . ' " � � ° ' � "
� 66 .. . » ' ' • ` .. . , .
� ,
... � • .
� , , . �. . . , ..
� e <, ' '_ , . . � �^ - .
" r+�_ 0�.�
8.84cr
12. 63
?:�_ AQ�
" � .32. 04 . - ` . . .
, � " . ' �21.20' - • ',
. • �! _. t 4� a� = . �.
11.8.�,
11.85
11_qP
. . ,...a. °' :'17.93 , , y . , �� .
� , . ", 31.. 38 3 .
252. 97
. . ' • .' e ° ' ' S }
_,J � (y t
• . ' .. _ :- . . �'. . .. ' __ . _ � . ..� ,. . .•' "-,, �. '
• _ : . . - :;� . . . . - :z� --- -- - .. . . • ` • i
- . _ - , . . .. :=s� � . . ,. . _ .- _ . .s . . • _. . . � � s
"� - -- - -- - ----� - -�-- - - ---- - -------- ---------�- -- - ----- -- - - -�----- -...---- --_-------
��•13 Feb ] Claims List F'aoe 2
�--j Thu 11:�8 AM City c�f Mendc�ta Heiohts ��
� 4
j�— �'emv-Check-Nutnber--_.__�_._6_.____.__—_—. —_ _ .__�_�—
i � zl
'3� Terop. • 4 �
6heck .—��__.._._-------------------------------------------- --_—�� � _� -
a �4 �
Nurnber Vendcm N�me Accaunt Cade Cc�mrnents Amaunt ��
�� �
6 � ___ __'_ ___^_—r___.,_,�_ '__�___"—_ .._'_'__ _'__.'__�_ _____ 8
� e I 6 � ' 21. :�0 9
L� Tc�tals Tern❑ Check N�unber_��_ 6 — — __v�_^ —___ �o
„�
iz
I��i I73
,��� Terno Check N�trnber 7 , ia <
2' 15;�
� }13, " 7-�arr�-Er,oineerir,o•-Cc ----------- 55=4�inc-B:,Q�-k�O�-------• --------•- Re-90-4-.—•-•_---� __i081_�17 '�
+ i�
i..� �a�
��� 7 5. Q�81. 17 79 �
��-'----i-ot��s�emn-Eheck�•�Vurrtber------ 7-- ---- — �Z�
���I .
i� 22 '�
��e Temo Check N�unber 8 23'`
za
2Oi B Banyar� Data Systerns @1-4�30-490-1@ installatic�n etc ' � 150.nc0 �5
26 �^
27� 8 E+anycm Data Systerns Q�S-4330-4�@-15 " 1��1. �CQ� �2�' �
ia ` _ �enyon-Data--Systerns�---,---�-.�-422Q�--d,33=E� - � t -p..,Aj�� . ,za
29
24 30 1
za 45@. 0@ s� '
25 t-a3-s—T�erno-�Meek-!>I�arnber �-- --�-- --- 33
�26I 3q � ..
Z�� Temo Check Number, '3 � � 36t-�
29 9 Pattery & Tire Warehause 1�-433Q�-4'30-60 oarts �5-'�� aa
�~30 9 L�atter'y & Tire W�rehGuse 01-4330-4�0-7Q� oarts 54.74 39�
a� -E�i��ewy-�-ire-Ware�ettse—:^b=r��3@=1�9@-�@ o�x , ao
9 battery '& Tire Warehouse 01-4330-44Q�-2Q� ; o parts �'� � ,4�.50 � , +: 41
32 . p ro. { � 42
� 33 ' � g �attery & ,Tire W�rehouse � • 01-4330-k4Q-20 , ;' oarts , � � • - �7. 61 �. � as�
44
rRC�L{SE--i'i —/• �^"-rwv=r�' �Te'�'�=L`� Be"1 45
34 '
35 __ ______ 46
36 `i4 �79. J8 47 �
98
37 ' . , � . � - , ,. r , _ • - 49
. >, . • .e , . . % . , . , .. , .
�:, 38 ; .; � „ .,, . .. r , ? " - , . , � 5p �
'� 39 a; Ternp ,Check � Number, , � 1@,4 � ., „. `� , - . . .. � , .. , - � ', � , . ., � , s�
, ' S2
4� 1@ Kevin Batchelder 01-4400-110-i@ 1/16 rntg 1���� ` 53
42 1@ Kevin R�tchelder @1-4415-110-10 rni reimb �8.56 ss�
56
43 "� . ` . ':. � .a +.. , � _. . _ • . . ' " 38. J6 . , .. � 57
44 > � , �� e . , ., „ . � ,,. . ' . ,. " , .. 5g � • )
as. Tc?tals Terno Check Number . • 1@ � - _ �. . • � " ° „ , ° ` '• 60
� s,
47 Ternp Check Nurnber il ez.•-�
63'._.
48 64
60 � ' l i ' � - � . , , . . � �. . . , . , .. , � ' � � ' 192. �1@ -. ' . . 6� U
� 67 ' , r��—�r.n�'.t;,�•^.~B':^ �r-� � " � �'� ' 6e
b2 � 69
�;-• 63 70
`•' 64 Ternp Check N�unber 12 72
66 • � � - • �
" g6 � 12 Baard af Water Cc+rnrnissianers x Q�1-4425-315-30 - , a Jan svc , .. 77. 22 �� , �a,�
� � , , ,. . -,. , ns: .. ' . . ' � s . , • t 76 �...�
� - .. ,. .. .., _ 7
..� l.�
\ . . .. ' ' ' - ' . _ . .- ' . _ ' , i _ , y . . : `. • . ^ . ^ . . . ..
r '- ' „ '� _ " . . ' . • - ; . ' .'. .. . : ' . ' ' ' ,- ', .;k� � ' � .. , ... '. . .
t,,. .... . _.._ - � ..._ _ � ._. .
� ' 13 F'eb ] Clai.rns Li.st
,.� Th�c il..�.r8 33M Gitv cf Mer�dc�ta Heicrhts
r �T�ernp-�Gheck--N�irnber------- --1�-- ---^...^_._..� --- -• ---------
z �
� Ternp.
3��----Gheck-...---_�____._--.._.._�_�._..___._�_..__._.��_ ..._.___.__----._�__._.._-.�__._____,
�,� Nearnber Vervdor Narne Accour�t Cc�de Cc�rnrner�t�
sj
'� 1�-L�c�ard-�+�-Water=-G�mrni-ss-i-amers--�6=s►k::�=QJ00-.--@¢�- -•— J�n.svc_
�'� i� �c�ard cf Water Carnrnis�icner� 15-44L�-31@-60 .I�n svc
� le Bc�ard c�f 2later Ccrnrnissia�+ers 4�-44�Q�-��Q�-Q�� Re 86-1
`:�----�---i-�-�E�c� ard-c�#--LJat er-Gc+mrn i ss a�anen s-- �19=-446Q�=Qi@0=2�Q�----_.__._...___� __ ____ _.. __ Re _.89= b-
�'e� 12 E�c��rd af Water Caromissicmers 70-446Q�-871-00 Re 91-3
iM1{
' j __
:9'
�.—^— ..---% .—_.....__..,.."'__'�...'___....._., _.�_�__........ ..�' ____.._..__._'..._'__�__..... _'____
"� 7ota1� Tema Check Number 1�
ic. •
i-ES
r-t^�•erno�-�Meck-hJ+�irnber---_....-.- 1.
� ��1
"� i,� E�usiness Reccr�ds Cr�ro
'�s�
Q+3-�£�lk
13
� ic��al� ierno Check l�turnber 13
elect3ars hac�ths
F�RDE J—`'
Amc�urit
'�6.��_
6. 8�
3. 754. i 3
1..�54,.9.�.
473. 45
_..._. __.- _�_._..._ ___�.___�-..___.._ �_..-
Z� Terno Check Nurnber 14 Z9
;z3 ao r'"�
•24 31
z: -�4--G3.-#�V-t+�C#.�i�-SLa[3p1?/ —� ,.1=43.30�j3tA.--: fD �24Y'..�� ____.. j+r.'._1. �.1 s2
� 14 Gity Mcrtcm 5upply 01-4330-49Q�-50 flarts �4�''�j �33
�2fi , 34�+"'�
� I 14 Gity Mctar Sunply Qti-433Qt-464r-30 aarts 28. �k �35�a-�
�2?� r ' .• ' 36
jz�'=�---'r':-c:.�--t-�t-4�ic+tc,r--Sz+pnl•�---- "'i=4334�=4.-'3Q�=.70 nar_�.s�.... ^t i_;#�
- 2e 56
.., 3 196. �9
3S .> . '"�-�,—�c2ifFj3—�i�Ei�S—�iLttA�32� —} � . , < < > ,
`a2 Ternn Check Nurn6er ' 1� ` ° • ' ' � ' ' • ' ," . .- . ' � �
33 ° .. . . . , . .. .
34 15 Camrn Cer�ter Q�1-4330-440-20 rors 79• ��
35 15 Cc�mm Genter @i-43aQ-440-�0 • rors SJJ.3ft1
36
37 ;a . ' _ � ¢ . ' , � _ . .. - a . , , o � ." � �.�t.=J. �w'r'1 .,. .
� 15 Cc,mm Genter^ - . ' > Q11-433Qt-440-20 , g;: . , rprs µ . . . , . ;, ----- .. " • ,.
3$ �• __ . , >�� . � ., . , . , . Y aN , i.� e; .
.xV "�.,s
39 • . . � � . , , , . . . , a . . .. . , c , .. _ < . .. . _. .
4° Tot�is Temo Check Nurnber 15
a, '
a2
� • �15 �Cant_inental Gablevisio.n - f'�` .�.Q�1-42¢�Q�-61�+-�Q+ . ..� � , _ Feti` svc ��. , . 'r. . � , a a . 5.95. �a� y� . '' : :
0
'� � -----
a�
�` 11.90
aa
A3 - , . . , ;k � � . z. 2 � . '" . , . ` " " , .. ' 7 " " . .. F " . i ' . . .. . ,. 3- ' ,.
so Temp Check Number: < �a ;1��- " ,��: . , .. , ..� ,. . - _ , � ' � ,. ^� . `� a °�" '� � . - A �. � .,
61 . » . � . . � . . . .. ., . ., � _ s!
ss 17 Ca�riect Ir�c ftfi-420Q�-61�-3t� JARI hiEiVDHTSMN�D 25.76
` 63 ----_ •
64
66 = ".� ,-��,tals 3erop Ciieck Number ' `1? . - `.. � � ' � , . . . �,. ..>.'' � , x. . ...�'J- -. � � _� .. . ._ ._ ' .- .
4 s�, • ' . . , ,,,, , � ' < .. • � . , . . ' ` � , . • ' , , `
�s
a
)
. ,
13 Feb 1.
Thu 11:58 AM
Ternp.
-Eheck
N�vn6er Vendcm Narne
clairns List
Citv of Mendot� Heiohts
8
Acca�rr�t Code Camrnents
1-cw--l�ba�r �A1--4��1--33�,-8Q�— -------JAN-Svc.-
� I 18 •
i
��ta-i-s—T-emp-Eheck-N um ber—
il2 Terno Check Nurnher 19
3 �__ _ __'
4 19 Dakata Caunty Auditar
6I —_
6_I Tatals Terno Check Number
01-4,s��h-110-10
19
solys
Gaoe 4
Arno�rr�t
1, 409. 0Q�
21 �0 Dakota Cc�unty ,Tech Irist @1-44@@-O�Q�-24� Ral 92 trno 3, 625. Q0 Iz��`� �
-------- • ize
23 Gi� � � _� u._"�'_ "�__ _ J. �7�J. nLti 30�.
24 Tatals Terno Check Nurnber 20 3�'-7
32
2b - _�__'__._�. ��'_'_'_��_� 33
z6 .Terno Check N�vnber 21 ' 3s E�
s�
ze n-�f�lr�,-3�,e �`-3�4�a@�4 SQ�=�sQ+ r-pr- � Sg_67 36
�29 21 Discom cf Mr� Inc 01-433Q�-450-30 rors 31.5@ 3a
30 �1 Discora af Mr� Inc 01-433@-450-30 , rprs 6�.17 I39�
�-�,F ,"-;;,�-t��c m, _�. �. n�-_—�,,o• �0-a@ r-ur- ao
37 ' 21 Discom of Mn Ir�c • 01-433@-45@-3N '" rors . ^8.34� ,�; 42
� 33 �`.`0 ' �l Disccm c�f v Mr� inc - � � 01-4330-450-30 , rors - ' „ 197. JQ� . , � 43 �
44
�"as �1 Discarn of Mri Inc 01-433@-450-3�h rprs ��-9� as�
36 --- ------ a�
48
37 � .,Totals�'T'emp Check Nurntier � ' � - �1 > - . , • � � " " • , �� d • - " . " so
� � � • . ^ � ^ � �. ° ., ., , y , , . . , a � ' .. � . - • .. ' . . 51 �
39 . • ,. .. ° .• " ,e,. .. " ° .. . . . . , - . ' _ � 52
40 53
4Z �� Dodd Techr�ical Cc�rp @1-4300-11@-1@ solys 1�3.0Q� 55�-i
56
� - ��2.' ' tl.. ,.. : . .e.. . . . .". , - ". � � < ` r. � -1�d3.�1@ . 6e,
-' 45 •• � ict� i s Temo Check Nurnber - $ ��C , - > , . � „ , . ' a • _ � " , � 60 � ,
� Temo Check N�unber 23 -- - ---- --__ ___ __ __ _ _ 61
47 • 62 � —
63
`� 64
.. ._ l . , -• -• -• � - •
49 ' . . . ., , , , _ _ 6
_.60 . ., za ' .�. . � � , . , •• . ' . , , • ' � . > . ;, 9az. s¢� Y � . . � s;C.�
6' � nb�r . , � > � • Y � _ < . se
62 ' 69
'�63 �� �
Temo Check Nurnber �4 �i G
~ 64 72
-" s6 . ;. , E-4 Jim, Eldridoe,' 01-4330-4k0-�0 � souad rprs ,. � ' - 57@. Q0 - � _ � ' . � �a,.- �
• " __ . > . „ . �. . � � , . � A. . � ° ______ ' . t 76 .
7 , . . > -� , < . .. c, 7
•.1 Tatals Ternp Check N�trnber �4 C
- . _ . - _ ' . : f i:��:, .� . : . .. , . � - - _ . , -
• .. , . � � - . ^ f - . . . , . . . . .- . . ., , .
_._.� _ _..__.-- - - - — -
�--------.__---- --- -- -__ . _ _. _ _ _ ._.-- - - ------
I� 13 Feb i . Clairns List F'aoe �
-�� Thu 11:58 RM City af Mer�data Heiohts
� -�'-emo-GheeF�Narnber— ---- �S --�--- -- - ---- _-_ - ---- --- --- -- -- - -� -- �- -- ---- - - - -- -- -----�.� -�
:21 �
�3 � Terno.
6fieck------------------.�_-••-�-�-�-�.------ -- ----•--.�..____ • --- - _._..�-------•-----_ _�__-.�.__.,
41 N�unber Vendcm Name Acec�unt Cc�de Commer�ts Amc�unt
�6-�--2v-F#-=I-r,st,�iic-t.er-s-�Assn— -�1=44@D=@34]=..30.-_� _._-,.__�splys^.----------�__..._ 16.3.�.3._
)'!
i e I �� 163. �9
5
��oi-=--?-Eta�s ��rnfl--Gheck--Nttrn6er---- ��-- - -----_____.�__-----.--.-------__.,._.__�.`�.---�._.__._---_._.___._�_-_.
i
�'� Temo Check Number 2fi
a�
�" 26 Friendlv Chev GEQ �^ 01-4330-44@-��h ` ~ rors � �1Q�@.@0 ^
S4 '
__ ___��_
'76 �=� �__._.�_'_.._._._' �"_"' _�__"'___..��_..._'_.�._�.... � ______."�"'.� �__.�..__��Q�.�Q�.—
.56� Tc�tals Terno Check Nurnber �6
,� •
1e -erna--Sk�ec-k--hlEtraber----�7 �
I's : ,
��0 27 Gc�pher Hto & Sheet Metal • 01-4335-31@-50
ziI
zs c vF�er--F�� g-&-Shee�-.Meta 1_��__Q11= 4.s.35�a1 m-��
:Z3 27 Gooher Htg & Sheet Metal 15-4335-31@-60
sa --
�1_. __. ...
Tatals Temo Check Nurn6er 27
rors
r�rs�____ ._ ___.
rors
143. Q�0
3._4_3.._Q�@
143. @0
�"30 28 Grafix Shaope @1-433Q�-440-�0 solys i:,.Q�O
si . �8'�' - . .. , . . , _ � ' , • .
sz �" ` , . , 15. @0
Tc�tals Terno Che�k Number � � �8 . ' � �� • • • - • F � �
Y 33 r ..i . , . .
3a Temo Check Niunber 29
35 '
36
�„=Ga�nrnl Tire 01-4�-+QI-�/ 9�I-So� rc,ra ��4 9"-'
�; 37 • , - 29' 6aadyear Cc+mrnl Tire „ 01-4330-490-50 , � � ° , rprs , , . , � : � ._ 11i.00 �, , � '
w� 38 � . "4 ' > , � ., , . . .. ______ . .. .
39 , __ ` ., .. ' h • x .. . ` � �" > .a' , � .,s ° � a P .. ., e �c
q� Tatals Terno Check Number 29 •
� a�
az '
°a ' �. , " - < � . , . � - . - < , , .. . ... •• . < . .
`� , 30 �Gc,odyear Service Stcme - ` 01-�r330-44Q-�0 ; �- � , ' , rprs, � • � • � a �� ` ;9.75 ' � �
as �.;..�_... Fc......,; ��ot.Ere ` @��►�3Qi����Q+-''�t ` ror-s " = 16...0a ..., . A
ae -
a� 6Q� �5.75
as
Sl�eslc N��rnber a4�
so Terng Check Nurnber. 31 � • � � , r„ . � ' < . V ' , . . ' . ' > , .n. • . , ' 3 ' % . . • ' .
67 a " , ' .. ' . � ,. - . , '
�
6Z 31 6aoher State One Call 15-4210-Q�6Q�-60 Jan svc 23.54
j 53 '
54 __ �^___
6s ;: � Tatais Temp Check Number s' 31 � � . "� � � _ " � ° ' , � � . � , -
� r . �> er--3� � . . . . � _ " , _ .. .. ,- , � . °. � .
�.a
' . � . . :"� .. . . . ' . . ,.: � - • ,_ ,. . ,': :;..:-_ ; ; . , ` .' , _ .
�.)
T-�•�
�i
s
�- ._.-_---- -- -- - - - -- - - -� -...
l�
; 13 Feb 1'_ Claims List
� Thu 11:58 AM City c�f Mendc�ta Heiohts
i- i'emo�C�fieck-Nurnher ------------ 32 -- --- ---------- - ---- --- ---- --- -- --- - - - -- - � _ — -- - - --- --
� �-�—
'�i
; 3 ( Terno.
�_--Eheck ---------.�___ -- _ _. __-- -- -- - -- - ... -- - --- _- - - -- •
�5� Nurnber Ver�dar N�me Accc��rr�t Cc�de Camments ` W
(� -.� ` --- - -- -- - - - - --- ----- --
� 32-GdrrC-l��ttr-{_ake•-WMO- --18-4404-000-Q�Q�--- - 92 cith share
I8
9� ��
'�oi -=Tota3-s-Temv-C-heck-Number-------32--- __----- - r__-- ----- - -- -- - - --. -- ---.-----
i,,
• 1 Temo Check N�unber 33
�-� — •--- - --- -- - - - - - • - --- -- . . _ .. - — — --
�i3i 33 Scc�tt Henr�ir�o 01-44Q�0-030-3� rni reirnb FFI trno
�74:
',V� __
�-T---J"J-.-- '_�__'__�____. _.___� ___—.'—_�._____ ._„__. '.' _ _ '_' _ __._ _ ' ' ""__ _.��_'"__'__"_
���� Tatals Terno Check Nurnber 33
I �J
-- -- - • ---- ;
Raoe 6
Arnaunt
1-,::.37. 47—.
1, 237. 47
41. 25
_._41...25 _
`18' F-etnfl-Gheek--N��rnber—__�._�,4 -----•---- -- ---------- •------� - - - - - -- - - -- -.. _.� .._ - _--__------- ---
r27� 34 Hase Inc Q�S—'tFJQ�J—Q�JQ�—SQ� solys �2.80
�--r - ------------ --�---��.�---_�.� -- _--_�_------ -- -- - -- - - --. __ _., . .- - ----- •- -- -�_�. --_ ___ -- --
���+ .�'.�LF �.�.BQ�
4 Tc�tals Terno Check Nurnber 34
z�
`-5 --_. __"'_ _�'__._'._ _._�'_" •_�'__._'�..— _'__ _ _._ _' _ _ '_ __' _'_ _'__.'__'�."_ __—
'_6� Terno Check Nurnber 35
'2s•--�----3-5--3--t�-S--- --- ---�i� 433A-49�-1@-�--•--- --------- --- Feb._mtcn.��._._�— R8_a_.:,
i29� 35 I O S 01-4490-109-@9 Fe6 rntcr� 14. @Q�
"`'30� 5 I O S Q�1-4i�G8�Q�8J—BJ Feb tntcri 3.75
.,-�-0-5 ---_— --�Qrd=433@=46�t-3Q�— ---------------Feb--rntcr�-- ��-�0
32I 35 I 0 S 01-4330-445-4� Feb rntcn 14.@0
33t 35 I 0 S 01-43Q�Q�-@8@-8Q� Feb rntcn 31.50
�j-�--�� ?5-4.3aA'430�� ��b-rntcn �� ��
34
,3� 35 I O S Q�9-44�@-0@Q�-mQ� Feb rntcn 5.75
I36 �� I O S 15-4330-49Q�-6�h Feb rntcr� 16. �5
37 • , x , , _ _ .
` � . .S S J ' , +� , ,
39 '', '"<< TC+'t)c115 Ternp Check N�unber 35 •- . ,
40
47 Terno Check Nurnber 36
42
� �� .,�-�-, �;—R-T �'1�=;_.�-7� — �J.:'4-Qavrs�ll—
44 36'I G M�A R T 01-4134-110-1@ 1/�4 payrall
45 � � '
46
47 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 36
aa
ief�-�8eit-{UlNAa3BY' �7
49 �
37 Kat Keys
�-:=,�t Ke�:s —
37 Kat Keys
###
* 'Tctals Terna Check N�anber
� Q�i-4305-@5@-5@
—��%=�+.-3Qic�3=Q��Q��QI
Q� 1-43Q4.r-07Q�-7R�
37 • ,
SOZVS
6}�-1�6
solys
;
ir
"�
�I
�e -
�
D
,
jl 7
a�
c - �
��
e':
3�
0�
,�iI :
J
3
41 3
�
> :�5@. Qi0 � ,, ae
� ' 52 \y �
53
54 �
55
�F4_ 4 56
' 94. 98 s'
58 i
------ 59
� " GO
67
sz }
. .. . .�J. �8 »
� ��
46. 14
( 1
r
j.-------- -----
i ' 13 Feb i
-� Th�� 11:58 HM
i
�i -etnp--GMeek-Nitrnber-
..�
� �
� � Ternp. .
13
`s .%.f'12C�f---'—
5 Nurnber Vendar Narne
...j' i + '__8-KQ�s-We1r�i�T
IE 3$
9
—� ����e�erno-GFae
.�oj
♦"I Ternp Check N�unber
�f!"I - -
!''I 39'Lang �'roducts vl 01-4305-0�0-50 -_-.__._ _ ---= rc�ad sions}�- - - �-.�.� ..._.....438:Q�Q�--"._._._.-��_�__�w»_ ....
ia! ------
j� d -- . � ' 9i$._Q�¢�
�.`� � 6�'j' _ �"_��"_.��__�_'___'_--__.__._._��._�._.�r_ — -
)'�� Tatals Terno Check Nurnber 39 ,
lnl
78 nt�#aec-{c�l�saber 4D— — —_-------- -
19 � ,� ., • . n ' ' � , ..
I30 40 M Thornas L�well � 01-2Q�10 � • Ciyt rnor canf exo reimb 1.378.6�
z'� _ ` _� _ " ' �..- --..��.....__�� _ ----_.-- _ <
�2� 4�
3 1. 378. 62
24 Tatals Terno Check Nurnber 4Q�
25 __�_ _ "_ .
- 26I � 7erno Check Number „ , 41 , � � � , x
,Za'� '�- �'�c-`4c�-Lc..-,.�a�a#.��ao � � 4-a� rn � ' � " � ;�3'�_94 �
r�rs�-
Z9 4 1
239.94
.. 30 r.,� �-�:r,^.'�.iaber�l
37 `, . i a- ^ .. . ' . .. ' • " . , . , .. ' > •
az Temp. Check Number , 42 " .. ,� � .. F ,�� � . � .. , . , . , . ` 9 ` - . • . . , .' �
33 1 ., . . . .. . . .. v o .. .
34 4� M A R Enterprises Ir�c 01-4305-03@-3Q� Caur�ty credit 4@:,. Q�Ocr
`35 4� M A H Enterprises Inc 01-43@5-030-30 splys �18.09
36 •
7r37 'i ; , ; , ,. . � � , , . • .� . 1� , " ' .. " ' ' a�-s , '•s � � � , _ •
(!%38.. .:2"ir 8� 's � ,..- . ....•' .,-t',..,- . .< .. ."• . , ; $ " . • ^, ' ..' , x' . ' �'� ._. J . 1i.3.Q��. . ., .�. ` _
39 , =�Tota1-s`Temp Check Nuinber' < <:�42.�,.:.`; .. . � . � � � • ..'` , . . . • . . , , , , ,-
. . . �, r
40 Temo Check�Nurnber 43
a, -
a2
43 �� . y . ,� :9 .t, iF . . . � r 1 � a . .' . < � .. <. . , o- ������• . , . .. , .
'° � . 43'. � • . . = . . , • �, � P .. ... 134. 50 y ' � •
aa ' � ttitbe, ... . '� ' ' &' � , . � ' � ,. .. - . .
as •
a7
`� Ternp Check Nurnber 44 .
e �• ' `44 Mendcta Hei ohts � Rubbisfi� • 01.'=428@-310-50 � � - Jan svc ^ " � .�x, " . ' �; 47• 95 ' '" -- .� - ' . "
�,fio • 44 Mendota Heights�Rubbish . , , �.1 428Qt-310-7@ „ r " � .�p; � � • • ' Jan svc � , • t• � - "" - " , 47,95 ' �
61 � , °�" . .. , : ., .<
62 44 Mendata Heiohts Ru66ish' 01-428@-315-30 Jan svc 4�.60 �
2=� 63 - ______
�. 64 ___ .
se� � Tatals Temp,Check Number � , 44 � s. • , �. "� .. ° - "� "< ' „ � . .. , , � ` 4.' � . �
67 — , _ „' _ "� , ' , ^ e y .. � ', x .,.. . ... s " ,. r N � � < ^- •
Clairns List
City of Mendc,ta Heiohts
--�8--- -- ---------- -----
39
Accc�ur�t Cade
F'aoe 7
Ccmrnents ^^ ~� �Y �� Rrnc�unt
Re__Ker�dun__.Hauses-�.� `_22�@�,
�. i=Q1Q7. n1 Q�
:a
- .�<
;: � '.�_:
�:::� .,:
:; ; . . ..
.��
C:
�:.:. - -_ -_ - . _ _
�,
� t:
.a:<
:�_; �� .
. ��
�:� :.:
,
�:: � _ - . .
; �, - , . .
;�: =�' �>;:�;� .. ..
`:���, -r°= . . - . . , - . .
� 13 Feb 1 - ------__._-- ----�-•- ---' Clairns List -- --- - -- ---___---�•--�--•— F�aoe 8 �
�Thu 111::,8 AM City of Mendc�ta Heiohts
�
� ntn-C-heek-Nurnber----�•5---- - -------------- -.
S
I3 Temp. ' ' . 4 �
3
a-f�eek ' ---____. .-_.— �..___------------------------- 5
5 Number Vend�r Narne Account Code Camrnerits Amc�unt 6�
�
6 ' west-S3-per�-6ervi�ee----ti'Z-�433Q+ �k�@=Qr@- ---� Feb--rnicn ���r1� 8
7 9
__ _____ 70 �
e � 62.4@ »'
9 4`� 72
�oI otai-s-�-ema-Bheclt-Nttmber•--=45 -- - ----__��__. �
73
14
^�� Terno Check Number 46 ����
-
13� _--__ __._— _ --.__ _�._ _�_.._ _" _' __' '_.' . _'__ _ ' ' _ . . ..._ 17 --�_
14 46 Minn Deot of Revenue , @1-43�Q�-Q�50-50 Jan fuel tax 49. @Q� �e �,.�
-- • ----- � is �
is ' �.� m � � so
16 Totais Terno Check N�vnber 46 �� �.` � � �z/�
17 ' 23 i,!
is� -ern�nz,`.��-�-Ni�rnbe�--1+� - -----_ _-_- _---- sa
25
20 . 26
21 47 Mir�n Mutual Life Ins Q+1-�Q�71 �/7 payrol i 325. Q�Q� z� �
'rr�n-Ma�-�ta3-L�-f-e-�-r,s-- �d-�2�74 --Mar or. ern—. t �.,,�a se
22 29
23 47 Mirm� Mutual Life Ins Q�1-4131-110-10 Mar prem 1-7Q� 30,_
Za 47 Minn Mutual Life Ins �1-4131-020-20 Mar orern 3.40 s��.�
' r�r-Mt�t�ta3-{=i�-e--3r,s --�-1=-4131--Q���-7�?- --- ----Mar-prem -- --- •'' az
Z5 33
2� 47 Minn Mutual Life Ins Q�8-4110-Q�Q�0-0Q� Mar orem 1-70 . , 3a
___ " ______ 35 �
2� cp 36
� 2
26 Totals Terno Check •N�unber 47 aaO
+' 29 39
ao
a� . fle-C-,ktee�t--Nttrr�be . , ao
.�, ' : , • .. a�
••• 32 ; . . � , , S g az
� ." 48 Mir�r, State Fire �Chiefs Rssn 01-4404-@3@-30 ,. • , mbrshp d��es „ 190. @Q� �� � aa�
� � � '. ,
_ � . ., .. ., ��____ . ,. . 46
as 48 ' 190. Q�0 ae
36 Tot�ls Terno Check Nurnber 48 ��
37 , � . , � , � � , ,
�r � Terna dCheck Number , � 49 � 6 <. . ' ..� . , � . . 49
, • • . . . " �•� , s� }'
as° ' :'� ; - ' m . . . - ' " .. , , .< • , . . . . " -
40 YYNSO't'�'C��t�fAa'� 53
41 __ ______ 54,
42 43 . J 1 Q�. Q�� 55 L�
_ �� ,� 56
43 . �. . . �; . 'f .. . " . � , � F ,... . � . . . a .. . � �. , . 58 �•
ae xTemp Check Nurnt�er • .50 ' � .� ` ., ' _ . ' . . . ` , ` ' . • . 691.�
60
� . .. . . . . . .. 61
47 :,0 Minnesata Canway �1-43Q�5-@�fi-3Q� solys 144. @0 sz;- �'
------ 63'..
" � -- 64
y , . . ., , . , , . , . .,, 65
. .so > Tatals Terno Check Nurnber <. . . ` , 5@ - • >. � • , � - ' , • s6� �
' • . s� �..
- .. . . . : . � .., • . ..
61 ` ' ,. � ` , , . . � � .- + .i . � , ,. . ' ' . 68
. _ , . . . . .. . ' : . . . .. . '€ . �
62 ' ' 69
70 �
Y sa 51 Mr� Dept Public Safety 01-4200-61Q�-20 conn cho 15@. �¢� . �� �
� _� �z
` 5� .,> ' ��� .. `� ' , ' . n , , " S` " � ` ..> .. � .. m ' b , . . � ' ^�C=tQ�. Q�QI � ro e ^ .. _ t ' e y �6 �../ �
J • G
- : �_: . :,-- � .:.:
•.:- - -
: z.
- ::{:.;.
:..- ..� _ -
�
-:_�. �.�,- -
- �3
.;�
ti _ ,;;.,�,
..�.< - -
- - =:.: . - �-.: �;.: .
��j�i� :.
� :.�2.. �
- �\:: :.\^: �..�::��' -
- ' � •:-T•;_' '~�.ti'i^�-.` ^
- :`.:�r�
'`
;'1" \.�.
2:
_ ,ti�:'
'lK%� ..
_ _ �:`�i: i;'
'4_` _ /:��: '
�':�w .
- � _ti� • ��ti-':: .
- ��:�� �
_ n G:=i �
'?� :�•; _ " _ .
��� .�i �
1}�.�'
--y:� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
'�•� 4:•
�.i
� \.�. +�;.� _ �
��� 1
S \ \ \� �'� - �''<i •! �
�\ K` �•'�.�.\' :��: ��:ti. _
' �.
�h� `� \ � ' \ �.+'•':: S :` : ::`�..
_�A- � '`.
� Y�� .�''� i�. ''ia..
V% ':� -
\ �.� �
�.. <. - �.2- :.�'-. -`\ -. :�. . . ' :
- `w'j'i � . �.\ � . �. �-.. '�: T:�
_ � :�:.`:.
?�.. \., . - - _
�-\ : �.'.Z.:ti� . - �� . . - _
" ' '" . �.�-^�� t . �"� . -. .., . . . . . .. i. . .
.,._ . _ . ., _ . _.._. .,_�.,.\.__.�..\��.._�...�. s._\�. _�__ _ .. .� _ .. . ._. ._. _ _ ..,._..__ . . .. .. . . .. _ ' '
�--•------- -_ �_._...__--- — - - _ __ . - -- -- — -- -
� 13 Feb 1 Clairns List
Thu 11:58 AM City c�f Mendat� Heights
erns��#�eek�-Ni�rnber- ---=�----_---_—��- ---------------- ---- --------_--• .. .�.
� �
� Ternp.
3 -heek--- — ------.�..._..�.�----�-----------------_.__.-- ----�-_ -___-_---- ----- --- �-•--
a
Ntunber Vendor Name Accc���nt Cade Cc�mrner�ts
s •
6
� �'�c-M��ri��-St,�ate-Ret3-remer��SystQrn—Q�1--2�7-:: -�--- ------�----��/7_ oayrall-..--.,._
E
,52 �.
� ---�'rt-ads�-ernu-�heck--N�irnber----v� -----------�--------- ... _.-�— --- ----------
io
L��I Terno Check N�vnber 53
53 Mc�rtori Thc�kc�l
-= � - — ----
Tatals Terno Check Nurnber
Q�1-4421-050-50�
�S � _� __"'
____.--- •---------- �--------..�.-- -
safe t salt
i .Yz�..�v:.�.—���....v��---_.�.v . - .� '_���.�� �������_�__..�.�����n���_..
54 Natl�b�usiness Furniture 08-460Q�-@0@-@Q� F� D affice furn
—�4-Na�-1--E<usax�ess=�Fsirna-t+_me-- —0A=.4600=000=00�--- -�—..._�P D_.af_fice_fur.r�___
54 Natl L�usiness Furniture �c8-460Q-000-4�0 F� D uffice furn
��c . . -----��,-•-- -----------
F'�oe 9
� Amc�unt�
_, � Jr - Qf-Q�
[JJ. Q�Q�
692. 41
., q 384. �'3 ,
23� . Q,�
. 197. @0
��y �Tc�t�ls'Temp Check N�tmber J=F . . - 3,y
26
27 ,: , , , , . .. 35
(fl�--6M2E'i4—{ULiifik:32Y' � --�e..,—� .—_____.__� ��_'.v'__�' " " . 36
28 37
'�39 :,5 N�rthern State Rawer Q�1-421� 31�-3@ Feb svc JJ�.56 as�
. c+_,-�,,,a.r�+_ ��aya�r, r�� -4a� a-�1 m-�0 FPb�Y '�5 ao
31 ;q�JJ Northei^n State F�awer - @1-4212-310-7Q� ' ., . Feb svc � .773.25 " , . ' `, a,
� aa � �..x:>. �5'Ncrthern 5tate ��awer 15-4212-314�-60 , •> • Feb svc � ' � � .773.26 `` --� ' Y ' , � ' ^ � a; �
ewer ' @���c-�-��-a @-7@ Ee . . . . �
34 55 IVorthern State F'awer 15-4212-400-60 Feb svc 1J14. Q�Q! 45
3s 55 Northern 5tate Pc,wer 08-4212-0Q�@-00 Feb svc 785. 62 4� �
�� �_, �
37 , , ,
l aa' � t'� -�'S°Nortfiern _5tate Pawer • . � „ 01-4�11-310-50 .. � - . � Fe6•.svc < . •� p � ," 244.59„ t • . � „ , , 50
� , 553 Northei^n State„ Pc�wer • . �' 4� 01-4213-310-70 • - � • , ' , Feb , svc , ' • • • �44. 5�' , � 5� �
39 �,� . ' . .. ... . .- . - . ... " " > " � ' 52
40 55 Narthern State Power 28-4�11-Q�00-00 Feb svc gQ�Q�, 6` 63
41 64 (1
___ ________ 551J
4z 7 `� 56
a3. ' ' 'Totals Temo Check Number ". , n �S ' ' � - ' - " a` , - � ' , ' � ' , „ ' , 5�
�qq . , � . . , • � ... . .t� , . �. � . � . �..�,. � . .. ,� . . 68O
„�.. t . � . F. r. .. . ,. , � , , b9
„ 45 > . .. A'" c , ., o „ • . � ., • , . r' : F' � , " , .. ' 6
� 67
•� 56 Northern State Fower 01-4211-42@-50 Feb svc 126.76 sa�
s
9 -. `•" 56 Northern State�'�Pawer,;p ; ` 01-4e11-32@-70 � � -� ` � Feb svc . �° � '�� " � ` � .638:@5 " " � ' � ' 66
. 50 , � . , ., ,,. ' , . „ , 66
` 56' Northerrt State fiawer . �.s �`18-4211-4Q�0-60 . • . . 6• Feb svc � , �- . - � 417:78 , � • " e�U
61 . Y. . . � - . • �s, � . s . . . . _ � ` ` 68
62 2�=i i. 9�6. %� � 69
�63 Tot�ls Temo Check Number 56 ��L%
64 72
se• Temp Check Nurnber . . '� 57. � . ` , , .. . � . , „ . , . , � ' . . . , , .. ,. " � r _ ' /''�
7 .. .� h .. � , , . , c, , . . � , .. . . , ' _» �6 L.i
� ��
------ CG
- -�.; - ;�.:::: - - - - ,z .
- -�� -
�� -
- - ':� - -
- ��-• -
s., - >«.=��: z': _�'•
- =;:�: -
- - - - - - - • ��
'=�> — �>
- - ,..: -• -
- �� -
- - `::: � -
- -�?>= = "n
i_~ ='u .
T-��: _ �1;�> .
.: \": � -�.
:ti .
� + : �"' _
\ •
_ - .\�.'
.:\`�^. '+'+c'... ''\ : ' '
\ ' �t ���
- �'
� .�-':
� ,t-' \'
' ' �.*:: - . '
�c.` �+`:
- •:�? ' : \ .-.�: '
:�Z. �w
?�:\�. =:\ �n;�_+"•� '
°;'.�:��:: - �_:t:[' '
..��� - `�. =:t. - - .� - '°�:':.'•.
'�•:. - _ c :��::t4.:: .
-:.`.. :
�ti`� � ti => - _
t� " C:-
_ _ yi~�`.n_•_._�'• �.,
.\�
i\T�'.� �.� - ''\-� -':;�:. �.* - .
��� ti�. '.>'-:j•y"-. i�l�' ^:�`:::���..
.- . "' \ - V_i�~• .
�•\\r� - � ti':�` ,
. \�\= v ' . - . .
^^.�i- . _ ' •
. . _ .._i�' - . : . . t .
. . � .. '\ ... . _� .. �.�_._. ._ . � . . . �-.. » : . .... . �� .
_ . .. .__ _ . ___`_____ ___ _ _ ____ �- ;\-\i �. . . . � . . . _ _ . .. . . . .s
_y� � 13 Feb 1 _
Thu 11:58 AM
� , mv-C-hecirNumber--
:z
3 Terno.
a -heck- —
5 Nurnber Vendc�r Narne —
6
�
��I , Tot�ls Terno Check Nurnber
Clairns List
City c<f Mendata Heiohts
Accaunt Cc�de
57
Carnrner�t s
58 Pilorirn Cleaner 01-4410-@2@-20 Dec Jan cln❑
JH_"" '__. '-_' --___^-_.__.__._—
Tatals Terno Check Nurnber 58
Terno Check Nurnber 59 . ,
—��-Pea�--Ma�wat�Jt-I'4aa-r�-R�-Gc --�1-�+:�.'.:�=1.3�=-1�. Re_audi�
' S� Peat Marwick Main & Ca 05-4220-130-15 Re audit
59 Feat Marwick Main i� Co 15-4�c^0-1��-6� Re audit
�=;'ea�t-=Ma�w3-ck-�la3-r,-tG-6o-- Q��4�;�2�=1,.3Q�=Q�Q� Re-audi��- -
59 G�eat Marwick Main & Cc� 10-4�20-130-00 Re audit
59 �'eat Marwick M�in £F Co �1-4220-13Q+-@0 ke �udit
—�-^�-Gea�-Marw3t�4c�la3-n-IF--�a----1-4=1+;=�0--1-30=00 _--__.�.Ke_audit
�� Reat M�rwick Main & Cc� 16-4��0-130-00 Re �udit
1+72 - —
Tatals Terno Check Nurnber :,�
��rn�-C-hee�C Ntirnk�e �Q+
� "° 60 Rc�wer E�rake Entrp - . ¢�1-433@-4'3Q�-50 ' oarts .
"—��arer-Bi eke Err�r�e ' � �'.�-�.—.���=�'30-50� ba�t= `
120
-- T�'���s-�ern� �heelE, NNmber 60
. , . � . . • " x ... < . , � . . , , ., < . `
Temp Check Nuinber ' ` ` '. , 61Mce �'� ,g '. , a • . . , . T . . " . 0 . � .F . �. ;<_ _ ' .
61 F�ublic Ernpl Ret Assn 01-2Q�74 Mar prem
61•Gublic Ernpl Ret Assn 01-4131-110-10. Mar arern
<. 122 • , . , ' .. .< . . ' , . ... ' ' > y � .�> `" . ' � , �
Tatais Temp Check Nurnber " 61 � � ' • � � � �. ; � , ` �
TemQ Check IVumber 62
F'aoe iQ�
Arnc���nt
.i.�iJ.-m� .
198.9�
198.95
- 115. 50
� iP1�. @@
t o� � _ Q�p� �
34. 50
34. 5Q�
144„9�.9�
° 319. 5Q�
. •` .158.16 � , �
� .tit _ R4 '
1�0.�C0
48. @0
9. @@
& °� 57. QiQ� .> . ,. � • �
• . , ' . . '. . .,
t!'
E7
c'�
- b:f \,./
., 48 64
, _ � _ �
9 :. , � . , ' , _ _ . . . . - ,. � � 65
, 60 e - .. , . „ .. . � , � 66
. 62 • ' g. . , .: • � . 1,25@:00 . • , e��
61 • - 7 , . . , . - � , x. . . „ ' ' ° 68
62 . ' 69
�'�63 Temp Check Number 63 ���
64 �Z
. 5G .. 63 Schuster Eq , Go , 0i-4330-490-50 , � ' , � ,, • � Qarts .," , '" ' , � " 329. 46 " " ` . �a
..,x � . ' ' , .. .r ..s . . . ' , ` , ^ —.__M_ . . . .4 76
� —_ .� � • -� ` ' ' " . , ` 7
:,� Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 63 ' . �
' <:-.: . _ :,_: • •>.: - ••� �• - - -
�'
_'v ..
,�;. _
_ _ 'F•`ti:
=:� : i: ti -'
- .���
. .'�.>� - • �a
::�t::
- �C - ' �R� : i .�:,':�,:,:.
?\
- _ - _ _ _ , yi::; -
,'�:%.;' _ - - '`�-.
:�. ^�a
'�.;.:
: �:`:±::::.�;..
�. s': ��
- ?�.?: `.,��
�a�: .• '
�P. - i4� _ - �I.:
_ ' „\ - ��i�� - �>'.:': '
`� ,`� ..
��:�:
�_'i.~ '
't�.
'\•'
'�<t�>•�.
t:� \
" - ., r.:.,a'•�.�'i•� _:=:: ::-"
- :�:':¢::;
^? :»"
.i�;;i' - - - - - - -
^.''� :•'��
- ::\�' -
,�:
�..
.`: 1
- - �:v �:� - -
. �-a
- ` \ - - -
. _ '<��n >:i . �.
' . . . .:1' l.�''''�` -
, '���'�":�-�' - ..ti.:
. . . . .a . '�1�:ti:: . _ . _
. . _ . . : . -. . ,' . _ . . . _� . . .. ��. .. .. . . � -. . � . .'.
�� ,
13 Feb 1
Thu 31:58 AM
�j ��
�i Terno.
-Eheck
Nttmber Vendc�r Narne
5�
Ei
� i , �ti---s�iflY'C+C�i(� 12
# -- �
8 64
�' -�-�t-�d-s--�'-emo-Ghee
� o!
i
n'
Clairns List
Citv c�f Mendata Heiohts
Accc�unt Cade
Comrnent s
F�oe il
Amaunt
65. �Q�
�i Ternp Check Nurnber 65
�z,
�"�— 65 Sautham E�usiness Comrn � 73-4240-87�-00 � � Re bid ad 91-4 184.44
I
,,4 . .
_ ------
,s� 5 ---__-----�------ ���__-.__�_-------------------� ---184.44
��' Tatals Terno Check Nurnher 65 ,
16 erno-Chec-k-Nurnbe�-- -66��.�
�0 66 Sr�yder Drun Stc�res 01-4s�5-05@-SQ � solys `� � � 18. �5
�'� � 66-Sr�yder-Drv.ic�-5tores--•-- —@1=4305=07Q�=7ID--------.— —snlys.� _�. � , 1$. �-'�
zl
1`�i 66 Sr�yder Dr��o Stc�res 15-43�5-06Q�-6Q solys 18.2�
�24I 66 Snyder Druo Stc�res 01-430�-070-70 splys B.JJ
2s'�� G�',�,�d2r-D�t�-�tc�r•-es�----- 0.t=-k30.:,.JIl�O��II �olys _ .�.49
,1�161 " 65 Snyder Drug 5tares 01-430�-03Q�-30 splys 8.38
� 66' Snyder Drug Stares �1-4305-Q�70-7@ solys 21..66
zaL--66-Snyde�Dri�o---S#,canes----_____ ---QYd=.4,3�5=02@-20 � -spl?�s- � _'�5_�7
29
�:30 52g 121.6Q�
a� ,. .. e���-s� ��rn[3-Gk+ec-�-Nurribex^ ; �,5 , _ . .
33 ;. tTernp Cheek Nurnber ., �. g7. , , , :, �. - ° ' , . � • , . � .. . .. . .. . .� , . �. . , ,
3a 67 Sc,uthview Chev 01-433@-44Q�-20 oarts 22.52
•3s 67 Sauthview Chev 01-4330-49@-7Q� parts 4.4Q1
36
� 38 � : 134 : � , �>. ��: _ • ` < . < ' - . . ; � Y � ' ` "' ^ < , ; , �5. 9� , . . . .
aa � Zotals ?emn Check Number �, � ', 67, , , � ` , " ' > : , ,, , • , n ^ , • . •, h� . . � , .. .. ., ,
ao Terna Check Number 68
� a, - •
a�
c_
43 • " 68 State vf Minri � ' • m1-4305-034�-3@ ' � eKernpt cert � " ,, ", 3Q�.�0 " • , � �
6 � _M '^ _ W • ^, " . � • ; ' ` � . • , ,�� � .. , . -: , „ , � � a' ' `. ' ( �, . .., . .,� ...
>, .._., ' . .
. .> ..
, . . .. - , �, . _ d '
�6 , . _ . . . . -. ° , '� • 70i �oi "• . . ., ..
� Totals Ternp Check Nurn6er 68
a�
°8 '',.��^��.;-r.�"'�.:n�er 63
a9 r. . .. , . ' � � • . , , � _ � .. , • , <�•-� , , ,> , . , > .
_. so °``a . .th:.69 Statior� NiY�e.teen < .: ;09-4�20-Q�00-@0 . .. .. . +J�n' svc� ' � •- ' " .< . . ° 5.995. Q�_ y . -
61 � . " . �. ' , . . - �,., .� ' .,
;� 63 69 ' 6, 9'35. Q�2 '
Tctals Ternp Check Nurnber 6'3
64
, . 56 , Ternp Check Nurnber � ' �, 7@ � '; ' „�� , , , , , , f3 , � . ' , .. � , , : , b �
ri . . s
% � �.� �. � . �� . . F � � . �.. . ��� �� >. � _ � . . � 6 .. .. . � .w� .�.�
�
_? -- ----- G
. - _ - _ `s. - - ' _ ' `\`. - :'vv.: ��_ ' ' . "
;\ ?
�:.
' �\ ' �.\•..� • -
_ _ �..� _ _ _ _
��� _
"hi"� :•\:
_ ' _ _ _ _ . \� ' ��..'..t`'
_ ,i.
_ ':�
. ' :. \ '
:i\ �
. . ' - �\-:i .
- �'� .
.'�� .•"Y'.'
`.5;'
` 4^'� �''
•\.� ,�\:�• _
.'��-' �`: _
_ ' � _ F��. `.
_ "_ . . ..�.�.;• ���� :`+'��.�: �� - '
L \
- • . - i�:ti.�.�.�.y.�_.. . .
:`�.
- �`�• � -
_ - �_ . , . �,-. . - _ .
.. _ . -- . .... . � '�;=�
- - -- �-� . � . . ,. , •- .. . • .-.. . _ .. .. .
! 13 Feb 1�
Thu 11:58 AM
-,
, ��-I - Temo-Ehec4rNurnber-
. 2
, a i Temo. `�__ _�
-heck
�6 Nurnber Vendcm Narne
6
�e Totals Terno Check Number
� s l �- -
Clairns List
Citv af Mendota Heiohts
Accour�t Cade
70
Cc�mmer�t s
71 Suri Sales Q�1-4.�.�QJ—Q�JQ��S� solys
-�f--Sun--Sa-les --- -�d=-434k;=�b72�=��+------------•—solys
71 Sun Sales 15-43@5-rc160-60 solys
�i3 ---- � ---- ---
Tc�tals Temo Check N�unber 71 , .
Page 12
Arnaimt
4�. @@
.40. G10
4�. 00
IZo� ' zs f
iZ�� 7� Sur, Newspaaers 01-4�40-11@-10 Re ord e81 198.32 z���
�� ��-SarrNewspaoers— --id=4�-4Q+=1�2+-�Q — --Re-c�r-d-278,__ t t _,.,gp iza
I 72 Sun Newsoaoers m1-4240-11@-10 Re c�rd 277 113.�@ 29
23I
�Za� 72 Sur, Newsoapers 01-4240-11@-10 Re 6udoe stmt 58.96 a��.s
-� Sit�i-Newst3apers �1.=A2k@=1.1��� _Rer_ar.d�.b2 � 3z
�26 72 Sun Newspapers 01-4240-Qt8@-80 Re vac firo '14.@7 , 34 3
27 72 Sur� Newspapers 73-4�4Q�-872-0Q� . Re bid ad 91-4 � . 46. �3 , as �
36
ss 504 64@. 52 3s �
�'3o Tatals Terno Check Number 7G 39
ao
ai .. , , ai
32 � Terno Check Number • 73 ,. , ° ,_ • > . �z az �
• � . .> " - . 43
33 ' � .. ' .: . � � .. . � • 44
34 Y1Y"�1"M5�—viiTi�Yri'��E� ^ _ 45
3s 73 Unifarrns Unlirnited 01-4410-020-�0 Splys Arndt _ 9•4� as
36 73 Unifarms Unlimited @1-4410-02@-Z@ solys Anderson �6.05 a��-�
48
37 ' + . ,
� � 219 , ' - > ,. . - , + , . , . „ 453. 45• , �. So _
-; � , .�.. . . . . , . • . , . , . �
39 •Totais •Temp Check N�urnber > . 73 - , ,. „ , � _ , „ , , ° ., , • .. , 51 `
' ' 62
4� Ternp Check Nurnber 74 sa -
ss' �
42 _ ,> _O 56
43 z „ .. � . . � . . ' y . . � ,. 57
'a w ; � 74 . � T , . , � �� .. � . tl • . � . .. X �.> � �63. 97 . < . 9 J
• 45' ` 6�� trt+� - . , , • , � so
� . si
47 62.
-� Temp Check Nurnber 75 64L'�
49 75 Winthrop & Weinstine Q�1-24�i@ � � . ' . Dec svc, ��gg3��7 � . � 65
66
60 � ' 75 Winthrop & Weinstine ' 15-�010: , • � . � Dec svc . • � - 5@8.35 ` ', - e�G
v 67 y� _, rr. • , � . ,,. ,. , : ,a . _�. �� " ' 68
ez 1.�,Qi 2, 761. 9:= �o
�63 Totals Temo Check Number 75 ,
»
.• 64 72
65 _ .. , _ .. 73
- 56 � Ternp, Check Number. - ' 76 ' �., . ' " • . 3 • . . ' _ . ' �< . �
� � . - � , � , .. , , . a • ` •. > .. .. . .- ' , . a . �6 \..�
� -- - , . -------- C.�
-1 - - �;: :...
.. .
::> `
,: _ . ;.
-:-;.- -
; .�. .,.
- _,-��>�,
>::_ - :�: -,::>. � <w :.. .
_ .�� _,�-
:�. _ ,�.. ,,::>,
_ . :�. �
- =,. : r :�
_ _ _ ,:..;: ''�� '.w`.-.r� .t:`.. - -
- 'ti. � 5::` - .5:i��'=;��:?::'
ti� ,
_ ' : �" %ti . v �a.. . :v.c:
�.. .�. \ 5. \ >:�:^
� �.. \_'
' :'��:- : �i:i>=[:.^:Y�l�: _.�,•. .a .
_ _ ��Yi�:: -.�`"�t i�:'
- - _ - "'z,:�: - <=�.�, <i-��..
,�x: ,.�_:�rt��'.
- : �-::-. -���.:,
` c �.r - : �;. i'F�: E>
:s; :;'Y.:'> - - � `::`
-.. _
' •��j;::j� �.+1
•:v� .�a
_.�..., _
<'3:�. '1:�+ �\•.��:^>..an:'�;='.>::c:u.: '_�':::�='^ .\.
- tt<:<:� :�•-:; d r;
. \ ' ?"^.-.?�:^� .:".
' ' �i::.' -.�. _ '
- % �. . K '
- v':>- _i.�~���:�.:ti
1�+ _
•' �,-• _ _ - _ _
•'�r. ����..�.
' :<�-' �;\.,. v..,i'._ _ _
� ••�� �', - .
,.- �; • �
_ `;i� �1 = �_, _
.\,a _
ti,r� \:-�" 'o'..U::=c`•:.>' .::.`� ��;,. ��•. , -
i,`�. �e;p. `�J., :p:> �:¢r.,:.,:::'
v : . .� . \=�� .xc`�'� -:i^:».: -`•2�•�:
�� �. .. — ,
- ;:� .
> 5% _ %ti'.-'::: s .� :., ::
:��" . �, . t - .
,:'��':s - . - •,� • >•_ - -
_ _:: :w',
. - :K;>'`''• � - . .
...�, �.. �;... -
. :�� ..>..�-:.., . _. . _ .
. �=i� :;..,-..�- ,,.:
�� �. , . _ . s .
. _ �. ,.... , _�:�... .. �__ , .-.. �.. _ -.._ . . ..:;c . __... ., ,. . _._:. .. ,c- --_:�_�.1-;�;,::.__ , .
'� ----- -�-- ------ --- - - - -- - - - - - �
13 Feb iS__ s Clairns List � F�aoe 1,3 ^^
Thu 11:58 AM City of Mendota Heiohts �
rnfl�-6heek-Numben---------76--------. __—_------- �- --�___ __ . _ -- - -- - -- ---- - - ------- — --
� � �
'y � � z
Terno. a �
4 =Gheek .�_�.- ------_..- -------•------------ ---__._ ___.._. _ . -- -._ __.______. ..--- • - - -----...—..__.._---__--------- °
�5 Number Vendc�r Name---- _ Aeec�ur�t Cc�de�-Y --A ---'- Camrner�ts '- v-- � Rrnc��rr�t �y 6
6 �
6 �
4.f]$i�. Q� 8
��BI T�tals Temo Check N�unber 76 . � . ; 9
_ io �
-- � i
� " ------_____�__�.��.__�_��-�_----•- ----- --�- ---- ' ;z
- - ----- -- - - - •- ---------
10� -_._ .� �� 73I
71I ____ ______ 14
� 7147 63. �91. 5¢� �s �
tiz
,13 r-ar�d-�ota3— -------- -------- _-_--------- --------- - n
,a 1e �
i� , 9 �
'_�_.____.._�..__..�__ .__ �""_"__ '._..__�.`�"�__.__�._ 20
�s - MANUAL—CHECXSt '—.'—_.._..__ �_. __�---- __.�--- ----- _ � 21
�,,. . 22 (^�
�8 13460 409.45 Dakota.County Bank replenish petty cahs zaz,�
,y „ , --- -- 13463 =10:00 -•-MASWCK-- ------ -Regr Koch ---- -- . , 24
< 25
' zo , � . ° • � 13462 277. 83 Li,fe USA Feb prem � � , zs �
�z� " A 13463 50.00 So St �auZ Dist Court warrant .' , 'z'
zzl "_ _�3�64---"_' _''..150.-34 "_L�fe"USA '-�--�-- -----Feb -prem._...___.-- �- ------- — zs
za 13465 30.00 Cap City Mutasl Rid regr F. D. 30,�
Za �13466 883.58 Nozwest Bank 2/7 payroll deductions "
as -. 33467�;�29:63iState CZ3yD.itOZ-C.fUT-`—"���"`. — �'-- 33
�zs ;; ' �13468 8,367.29 �ERR 1/3Z payroll , , , �4�
z� � • Z3469 , 23.84 " -. 2/7 payrol2 ' _ 3s
sa - "--'-'�3470—"-�75':00"Ddkbta"Couri'tl�Baril�"'-"-"2/7�ayroll' deductions 37
e: ss 13471 14,749.58 " 2/7 w/h se �
ao 13472 3,37Z:73 CoRaq of Revenue 2/7 sit 39
si � ., � . 73-4b;353:B0-PayroTl accovrit�2j7�het' payro2� , e 40
32 •• . . • ` • ° • � _ 42 fi
34 " . - �> -� , r . . a � %�.1%p„F � ' . , r, . . ,'T , , 5 i1
^. 35 48 �1
se G.T. 14Z,465.67 47 ���f
ae
' 37 . . � . . . � : . . , • . . . ' �.., ° ' . . .,, 49
r• � .• . .r. ' " . . , �, � . , o .� . ,. o ... F b0
. + . .. K ';� `a . 9 .. . . .y < � , �f: . . 4 Y � t .. '" .. .. " , S'I O
39 .. . , , . . � . . . ^ , J b2
40 b3
47 64 fl
.'� 42 65 �
56
_ � .. Y • ~ . : ` �z � �" , , a> .' . . .. r , ' , , ._ • , ^ . , a „ . . . . , .. , ' -x n . 68O
l46 , � . , , . " , " Y ' >. • , ' . .. ' ' ' . ° ... ' . � " 60
� 61
4� 63 ��
•^ 48 64
f60" .. p� „� Y a . . ,.` x M . ._ .. �; > .• " .. � , " , • ' x . , ^ ,s . 67`•i
61 . . . . , Aa ' . , ,. . . .. �- ' � .. . . �
68
62 69
� 63 �0 C�
." 64 77
72
66 � , ' .. � . . . . , < - � $ . , .. - n . 7
� 55 ' t ° . . . . ' > . . . . , , • , 74'r
� � � � �': • � ' . .. � ». . , a� d i m , . s � , . 7g �,�
�
'1 ' {�
J
- •>�.:;� _ _ - - - ..�..�'` _ . _ _ ..�;.r "u
_ �`i' :\" =\,."• � - -
- : :�.'
\:. �:.
:.,�� - �� j{:-
..,�`t _
�`1: .[
ii: "
.��.%-
r: S:� �
- '�:`,
_ -�\: C
~� ��:
' \== �:\�: i� .�`�. _ -
�i -
`"_ti� ' '-\ 4. - .�\� �
_ ` `�ii' :
t _v' " _ _ �` �:'.
`\'� _ \ �: : i:
�ti.i. � '.\ - -
- - - r->s. - - ' - - .
" :��•. _ _ _ :.4�:• '
�\\-i i-i-+ '
' ' ' ' ' " -.x_�
- +�\"`• ,�\:� - .
"`�.. _ _ ; � ,
-.C-•`� �l . -.,
��\='c> - - . .
c �. + ' - - �5 . ..
- � \ = ,.
` �, .
. :'1. �. " - � -
�� -
- - . . . •c� " .
, _ -�:, , : . � , . , _ ��` .
, .. 6�. - . . . . - : , .. . � . . . . . . � . , . � . .
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
February 18, 1992
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administ
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Personnel
INFORMATION
On Friday afternoon Maria Karels submitted the attached
letter of resignation from the position of Receptionist. Her
last day with the City will be February 28th. The purpose of
this memo is to inform Council of the resignation and request
authority to advertise the position.
DISCUSSION
It is my desire to complete the recruitment and selection
process as quickly as possible. I would therefore like to
advertise the position in the Pioneer Press next Saturday through
Monday, notify the job bank and minority agencies tomorrow, and
establish an application deadline of March 3rd. Although the
application "window" would be very tight, it may permit the
screening, testing and interviewing process to be completed
quickly enough to allow an employment recommendation to Council
on March 17th.
Maria Karels has been an outstanding employee. She has been
very competent, not only as Receptionist, but also in her service
as the Administrator's Secretary during Kim's maternity leave.
We will miss her, and wish her every success with the City of
Burnsville.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that Council accept Maria's resignation and
authorize the advertisement and recruitment of a new
Receptionist.
ACTION REOUIRED
If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should accept
the resignation of Maria Karels and authorize staff to advertise
the receptionist position and begin the recruitment process.
February 14, 1992
Kathy Swanson
City Clerk
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Kathy:
C ity o�
1Viendota Heights
I am hereby giving my two week notice informing you that I will
be leaving the City of Mendota Heights as of March 2, 1992.- I
have found other employment with the City of Burnsville as a�
secretary for the Public Works and Planning Department.
I have enjoyed working for the City for the past 2 1/2 years and
will miss working for you. Thank you for everything.
Si�ncerely,
`�'��=-�. � ..._
Maria Karels
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 � 452 -1850 �:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
February 14, 1992
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ
SUBJECT: Chamber of Commerce Proclamation
DISCIISSION
The City was recently contacted by the Northern Dakota County
Chambers of Commerce regarding their upcoming Chamber of Commerce
Membership Drive. As described in the attached letter, they are
requesting that the City proclaim the week of March 9-13 as
"Support Your Chamber of Commerce Week".
The City has long enjoyed a cooperative relationship with the
Northern Dakota County Chambers of Commerce and as an affiliated
subgroup, the Mendota Heights Chamber of Commerce. It is
recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Proclamation
as per their request.
ACTION REQIIIRED
If Council so desires, a motion should be ma.de to adopt the
attached Proclamation designating the week of March 9-13, 1992 as
"Support Your Chamber of Commerce Week".
MTL:kkb
�
;" w� �.
. ST. PAUL.
. .,<: .� . .
.�.Y
. M�ecor,► �
►�Ks�trs -
.... , ,.
r�
4 . �� �
. '�iosEuaurrc':.,,
. r ip �
January 30, 1992
NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY
CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE
1301 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE #116
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121-1220
612-452-9872 FAX 612-452-8978
Serving
Eagan Chamber of Commerce
Mendota Heights Chamber of Commerce
Rosemount Chamber of Commerce
West St. Paul Chamber of Commerce
and the Cities of Lilydale, Mendota and Sunfish Lake
Mayor Charles Mertensotto
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, Mn 55118
Dear Mayor Mertensotto:
In connection with the planned county—wide Chamber Membership Drive,
we would like to ask you and the Mendota Heights City Council to
proclaim the week of March 9"Support Your Chamber of Commerce Week".
With your proclamation we hope to generate enthusiasm, good will and
a continued spirit of cooperation in Dakota County.
If you have any questions, please call me.
Sincerely,
� � G����
Daniel A. Aberg
Executive Director
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COIINTY, MINNESOTA
PROCLAM�TION DESIGNATING MARCH 9-13, 1992 AS
SIIPPORT YOIIR CHAMBER OF COMI�RCFs WEER
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights is home to many thriving
community businesses and industries, and
WSEREAS, the existence of a sound commercial/industrial sector
within Mendota Heights is vital to the economic health of the
community, and
. WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights is proud�and appreciative
of the contribution the Mendota Heights Chamber of Commerce has
made to the community over the years, and
�IiEREAS, the City is equally pleased to be associated with the
Northern Dakota County Chambers of Commerce and recognizes their
efforts to maintain a strong economy in northern Dakota County, and
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights is desirous of
maintaining this spirit of cooperation and goodwill in support of
our area's economic health.
NO�+T THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Charles E. Mertensotto,
Mayor of the City of Mendota Heights, do hereby proclaim the week
of March 9-13, 1992 as
SIIPPORT YOIIR CHAMBER OF COr�SERCE WEER
within the City of Mendota Heights.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the
great seal of the City of Mendota Heights to be affixed this 18th
day of February, 1992.
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
February 11, 1992
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Ad ' r
FROM: James E. D' son
Public Works '
SUBJECT: Alley Vacation
DISCUSSION:
The Ivy Falls Creek Addition was platted in 1988. At that ti.me the public improve-
ments were installed for the plat and Braokside Lane was extended easterly to serve some
previously platted lots within the T.T. Smith's Subdivision No. 3 plat. The owners of the
T.T. Smith's lots cooperated with the extension and were assessed for the costs of the
improvements.
The Blum's are the owners of Lots 6& 11, Black 5 and Sullwold's are the owners of
Lots 5& 12, B1ack 5, T.T. Smith's (see attached map). These lots are only 60 feet wide by
120 feet long and do not meet the minimum requirements of the City's zoni.ng ordi.nance for
frontage or area. The Blums and Sullwolds desire to sell their Lots 5& 6, fronting
Brookside Lane and have agreed to combine them in order to create one standard sized lot.
As part of the combination and sale they would like to vacate the alley between the
lots to create more lot area. The alley currently is not used by the City. All the other old
streets and alleys have already been vacated within the Ivy Falls Creek Addition plat and for
the School District lots lacated north of Brookside Lane.
Upon a site visit I discovered two areas that should be addressed when considering
this vacation:
1. There is an existing overhead power line located in the alley, the City needs to
preserve a drainage and utility easement to protect that line.
2. The neighborhaod has already been using the alley as private properiy, there
are fences, sheds and mai.ntai.ned lawns on the alley. I recommend that the
City vacate the alley throughout the entire length within the block.
RECOMIVVIEENUATION•
I recommend that subject to the Ciry retaining an easement for drainage and utilities,
that the platted alley located between Lots 1-6 and 11-16, Block 5, T.T. Smith's Subdivision
No. 3 be vacated by the City.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Conduct the required public hearing and then if Council desires to implement the
recommendation pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 92- , RESOLUTION APPROV
ING VACATION OF AN ALLEY.
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RE50LIITION NO. 92-
RESOLIITION APPROVING VACATION OF AN ALLLY
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights is the current record owner of an
alley adjacent to Lots 1 through 6 and 11 through 16, Block 5, T.T. Smith's
Subdivision No. 3, Dakota County, Minnesota; and '
WHEREAS, a notice of hearing on said vacation has been duly published
and posted more than two weeks before the date scheduled for the hearing on
said vacation, all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes;
and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said vacation on February 18,
1992, at 7:45 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall of the City of Mendota
Heights; and
�PSEREAS, the City Council then proceeded to hear all persons interested
in said vacation and all persons were afforded an opportunity to present
their views and objections to the granting of said petition.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the vacation of the alley described above, situated in the
City of Mendota Heights, is in the best interest of the public and
the City, and is not detrimental to the health, safety and welfare
of the community.
2. That the above described alley be and the same is hereby vacated,
reserving from said vacation the 20.00 feet for a drainage and
utility easement.
3. That the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized and directed to
prepare and present to the proper Dakota County officials a notice
of completion of these vacation proceedings, all in accordance with
the applicable Minnesota Statutes. .
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this lSth day of
February 1992.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTEST:
.
Rathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
r. " i
c� >
_ _ * , ! i ....»._ ._... .. .. « , ' ` ' '_ - -
'.o .. .. � � v �: ^1..f 1, '.. �' .; ,. « ,. Go G Go ,. .. .. ..
a % (' '_ i i •rc,.:t :.o � r.u+xt ;�' tau�rrrS_I � ^-' � r 'I,
V ' �'�J�� !�_.. �_ , • � i ��� . 1 ; : s� 7�i / � B 7 c s 4-
, r t«.. ' '» .:�f:r_ .� � si-.. �,� ' R�""��]tC „ i`'' / ,r ^ ,� 6 �
�:� .�, f � . -�: d � y ,r �'
v r! /Z 13 �t'�., ;.r�� :., � � �:'���...;`�•' // �Z /3 ��. IS 1� 9 /p // [Z !3 �
.".i � ' '," ��' :j', i � • «�' S� t.
`' �'ti� • t �- ; � � ,,2 � „„,,) `�t
�a �.;�='.L"�:. �: �_��= � - ... � .-.--. _;
..—,.., <•-,.,-� � �� t,an,E.__�. ,
_ , � `��: ��-r.--': -- - - --Qu--=-` --- - `-t" ' _ - r-"Sv�7"�C,T �SlTE ,
.oi.e ,
b
d h
"'1 � loJ.56�� !p5
�� 9rt.
� o
v
�
4 b' �oc
�, � REAF�ANG
r�
a `" �' �LC)C K 9
y ry s
e�
Oow 8l.s� .aa
� N .ir � �'T�'1� �
tA w SU6QIV
-� � � F
� �
� � e9g ' ��
� wiit •v:
r rn
. �_� ! 7i4S Go
/S ;
� y
�:: � ::� � :�: �:�:t: ::'�'�: ,
�'r'.3; �i4�:�. •S�: �f;C;:� 4'"" $ 9 !d !I t � h
� y
:�:{� � �, oo So c � G o �,
�•j-rY ••QV�. � .�
`�4� t0 L.6 /
O
�� M h G
.a s x 1� J f r � .� �' " o
�
+�
a h 8
h 4
i3 i� is �� N i is �¢ f� r ir b
' t � �' +' \ dn � imO d
�o9.7p d� t
!•�
O!''i 1 T n• �
i3- .s4 a .�
� oo.s4 s�
n r
b �! �
tL7•b � •..
� �
� 5 h
4.
.� ,�i
N
0 �
� '
�l Ql
.............. I' ; Ii
. I
(I
(� ; I�
�. � � ; i��
� ��
Q��� ��
VAN�ALL
� STREET I)
�`�
� �� � �
� �
.._. II �, �I
Q �� � ��
�) < �
� �I � ��
�..,,. . II I�,
I� ��
� 1� I
'/'" . II I
.""'� �1 �
rn �� �I
. I�I � .1i.
"�L.
} � ,�y " . .��
.�ii � i�% � � �+BYav'Y`��s'flp ni
O �� W� �'a3`'fsdo .9 C) ( � m
cDi� m C�„ o m � '°o. � ? i
a �? X � � � � o �, _ " fi �
�
� �N o �� N " i
�,� —' — � s� , � a
rn
d � � �
� ._ .— _ ._ �`�° � � '
i
�-- SEE SHEET 5 — � � i
� �
� w �
i = o �' ,� �
o `'� D�� o N', i��
.t� mr w � o j� � s
i �� O N (
rn� � 3 � �
+Z � G
o � � �
a --� � �
. I � �
PLAT LINE = 6+16,77
� �un�u � k
-- �s i ir i�ii � ' � i
� � � � E �
m �` � 'iiiii�i� -_� r' � o � j (
m 7 0 �iiiiii� = a °! b C71 ! j.
.> ia�t�ai Z X o � �.
��'��t��� � � �
�������� w � ,
�������� : c
NtNtlt —. — — — — ^ — — —
i#Ii#1t '
� #fifiN# i i i
1111111
� 1�111111 r �
q� � � f11fIH1 `� � O : "J
V i �� i#i111ft ,{y +n G • S
N ������� � I
��������
r. i�un�
iun�n � : � j
++i�ui
+�it�r�� ,.�
���� .-► i l�.'
���u��� 0 .
u�u�� i �'
{I,if;N� �. � p i 1�
—, ���� m -� o i
�t ��� fi
�' f,���� � ' � j � h
� �� � -_
't��� �� � � ;
.. _ � ��t���� «,.�.
� j ���t �" � � i
� iftftNf O �
1111111
11111111 -'� p 1
!}l11111 w 6 I
i{Iftii
1111111 )
1111111 �
11111111
1111111
ffittift
illllll�l �
�,;:;;;; r �
�„�,,, � � � � !
4tt�iti
iNfiN � O I N O� I i
11111111
� 11111111 � � I � �
4 ti1lM,ii � + •
ifittH
I1111111 r
1111111 � b"' I �
1111111 rp i
If111N \ �
tlifil# E
ftiitii � � ,� � i � � 1
111111�11 � I (}J O
11111111 1 ; (j� t
iH{i t{ � � +�
..uu��
1 �
1 ' �
' i
� � �
♦
. _ _..-�.-.-,.,.-........... :...wa.�n.e.._ _ ' _: . L+T��CT 2 CI �
1
�
m
X
�
�Z m
D v �
�
O �i �
� T
�
•� -
� ;
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
Febru y 13, 1992
T0: Ma.yor, City Council, City Administr
FROM: Klayton H. Eckles KY�.�'�
SUBJECT: Street Rehabilitation Policy •
DISCUSSION
In 1989 I completed a proposal for a•Street Rehabilitation
Program. The intent of the program was to provide a system
for managin� the improvement and financing of city street
reconstruction. It was set up with the intent of encouraging
(not forcing) the upgrade of our old rural streets to urban
design. .
When a street reached the point of needing serious
reconstruction, property owners could choose an upgraded
urban street with curb & gutter and storm sewer, instead of
the old rural style. The City would provide some funding
assistance to reduce the increased cost of the urban design.
In 1989 Council reviewed the proposal, but took no action
other than to direct staff to do further investigations. A
copy of the original report is attached. Staff has been
studying the Street Rehabilitation Proposal, and on closer
inspection it is apparent that modifications should be made.
Before going any further staff needs some direction from
Council.
The following questions need to be answered before going any
further:
1) How important it is to try to convert the old streets to
urban design?
2) If Council views urban streets as very important, is
Council willing to enact a policy that reauires upgrading
to urban design rather than just encouraging it?
3) How much is the city willing to spend on converting rural
section streets to urban design?
It appears unrealistic to assume a majority of the homeowners
would choose curb & gutter under the attached proposal. Not
only is it considerably more expensive, but people have a
natural tendency to oppose change. Also some people just
prefer the rural character of "Country streets".
I have completed estimates of the cost to convert some of the
,•
1
�
more difficult areas to curb & gutter, and i found that the
estimates in my original report are too optimistic. A few of
the rural streets in the city could be converted relatively
easy. The costs shown in my original proposal would be
applicable to these easier streets. However, many streets
would be difficult and expensive to convert (Friendly Hills
falls into this category). Some streets would be almost
impossible to convert and would cause ma.jor disruptions and
severe changes in the grade of yards. •
An area like Friendly Hills would see assessments of about
$32.00 per foot assuming the city financed 1/3 of the project
costs. Compare this to the cost of a simple street overlay
as low as $10.00 per foot. It seems. highly unlikely that
property owners would be willing to pay $22.00 per front foot
�ust for curb & gutter. .
If Council really wants to see urban streets re�lace the
rural streets I think there are two options available. First
Council could make an up�rade ma.ndatory any time a street is
improved. Second, Council could significantly increase the
level of city assistance.
If it is not imperative that the rural streets be upgraded,
staff could make some revisions to the attached plan and
Council could adopt it. Then neighborhoods would have the
option of petitioning for curb & gutter. I anticipate that
very few neighborhoods would make such a petition, but the
option would be available nonetheless.
RECONIl��NDATION
I recommend Council discuss the attached rehabilitation
policy and give staff direction concerning the three
questions presented above.
ACTION REOUIRED
If Council concurs with the recommendation Council should
direct staff to draw up a revised Street Rehabilitation
Proposal with Council's input.
September 8, 1989
TO:•Mayar, City Council, City Admin�istrator
FROM: Klay�ori Eckles
Civil �ngineer
SUBJECT: Discussian of Street Rehabilitation and
Reconstruction Policies. •
�NTRODUCTION
S�aff is currently inventorying the tatal city�infrastructure
and Iaoking at long range capital budgeting. The mast
'pressing issue invalves the rehabilitation of many old
s�reets tha� are reachi»g the end af their life cycle,
Currently the city has na formaliz�d palicy concerning the
timing ar funding of rehabilitation prajects.
It would be prudent for the city ta set policies cancerning
stree� rehabilitation be£are mare street reconstruction is
compieted. Examples of prajea�s that will be affected
include the reconstruc�ion of Wagan Wheel Trail and the
rejuvenation of the Friendly Hills area. In looking at these
pro�ect areas serious policy guestions have arisen. This
mema shall be dedicated to the discussion of the following
palicy questions:
Is the goal of a street rehabilitation pragram ta maintain
status qun or encourage upgrading to a standardized city
street?
What are other cities doing about deteriarating streets?
What funding mechanisms (assessments or bonding and levies)
should be used ta cover streat recanstruction?
What basis should the city use for setting the rate of City
assistance (if any) on stree� rehabilitation pro�ects?
DISCUSSION
To address these questions this discussion will be divlded
inta three parts; firs� poliay goals will be discussed, then
ather city programs and possible programs for Mendota Heights
will be presented, and finally funding implications will be
examined. �
Pol�cv Goals
The most significant question, "Is the goal of �he street
rehabiiitation program to maintain status quo or to encourage
upgrading to a s�andardized city street", must be answered
befare any more rehabilitation prajec�s are started. A
grogram can be designed to encourage that rural street
seations in poor condition be upgraded to standard street
design. Or the city can implement a program �hat perpetuates
the existing street condi�ions.
,
There are some very convincing advantages assaciated with
a program that encourages (not requires) standardized streets
with concrete curb and gutter including:
+ Longer lasting streets due to elimination o� fatigue and
frost damage along the edges. Histarical data shows that
curb and gutter streets last 10+ years longer than rural
street sections.
+ Easier and guicker snow plowing of curbed streets,
+ Elimination of most plow damage to yard�, driveways and
mail boxes. '
+ Elimination o€ many ditch drainage prablems including
driveway culverts and bituminous ditches.
+ Reduction of yard damage caused by straying vehicles.
+ Increased pedestrian safety. �
+ Easier po2icy administratian with s�andardized streets.
+ Aesthetic value �rom the "quality look" of cancrete curb &
gutter.
Of course there are same disadvantages to a standardized
street design plan:
- Cost to convert an exist3ng street can be moderate to very
high depending on conditions.
- The city will lose some of its "Rural Fl.avor".
- Areas where existing yards are very flat are difficult to
adapt to Curb & gutter.
Based on these considerata.ons and the directian �.hat the
Council wishes to tak� the aityr a decision must be made an
what �a.ill be the gaal of the policy. The poiicy could da
nothing to encaurage adoption of new �tandardized streets or
it coul.d implement funding assistance programs and
ma3.ntenance prograxns that would entice re�idents to requ�st a
street upgrade: The specifics of such a progra�n will be
discussed belaw.
Sample Programs
Staff has �alked with Bloamington, South St. Paul, West St.
Paul, Golden Valley, and St. Louis Park to get infarmation
about different possib�e programs«
.
Thare is a common thread in all the programs. Generally
every program encourages the upgrade �o a standardized d�sign
in same way. 83oomington charges all residen�s living on a
non-standard street a speaial yearly maintenance assessment
to cover the extra costs af upkeep. Sauth St. Paul will not
do a street rehabilitation praject without adding curb and
gutter and bririging it up to standard.
St. Louis Park gives funding assistance on street upgrade
projects and then guarantees the new �treet, whereas if a
"non-permanent" street is just overlaid the resident� pay for
100� of the casts and there i� no city guarantee. Also
standard streets that need to be rehabili�ated receive
funding assistance from the city.
Anather factor that is universal, with the exception of
Bloomington, i� that all these cities provide some assistance
for street reconstruction from an infrastruature replacement
fund. Funding assistance for simple overlays varies from 40�
ta 75� of the construction costs, and the remainder zs
assessed to the praperty owners.
The city that seemed to have the mast successful system is
St. Louis park. The companents of it� program are listed
below:
*�Streets that are not currently city standard are cansidered
"non--permanent" . Any street that is non-permanent is
reconstructed at the expense of the residents �who have to
petition for the improvement), and na guarantee is given.
* Non-permanen� streets can be upgraded to permanent streets
at'a cost oF 16.50 per front foat, and the city picks up
the remainder. The naw streets will.be guaranteed for 20
years and the city will aggressively maa.ntain them.
* The 16.50 cost {which averages about 40� of the
aonstruction costs) is changed aacording to standard
construction aost indexes.
r
* Non-perntanent streets are maintained narmallyr but_as soon
as the street reaches a high state of perpetua], mai.ntenance
the street i.s na longer maintained, and any work on the
street must be requested then assessed to the residents.
* When a street is upgraded ta standard any extra utilita:es
i.anstalled as part oE the upgrade (that haven't previously
been assessed) are assessed at the full cost.
* Standard streets are rehabilitated after the 20 year
guarantee periad at a cost af $20.00 per foat ta the owner.
* A pavemen� manag�ment system is used to monitor the
condition af ali existing streets.
* All costs nat covered by assessments are included as CIP
and are bonded for, (thus increasing the city debt loadj.
Generally this program looks better than any athers because
it is easy to implement, �air, impartial, and has been very
well received. Obviously this is a program that encaurages
homeowners to accept the upgrading of streets to a city
standard.
THis program could be adapted to Mendota Heights very easily.
The major point of debate is how much assistance should be
given for upgrading and maintaining city streets. St. Louis
Park requires homeawners ta pay $10.00 for street repair and
$6.50 far curb and gutter installation plus any storm sewer
additians. Staff is af the opinian that these figures are
workable, except for the $6.50 for curb and gutter.
After examining the financing of any type of city assistance
program it appears tha� the residents should pay for a
slightly higher percentage of the curb and gutter, since the
cost to restore yards and driveways in this city will be
higher than in ci�ies lik� St. Louis Park ( St. Louis Park
has very few driveway� due to the predominance af alley-
ways). Also there will be Iarge �luctuations in the cost af
curb and gutter installation, depending on what the existing
canditions are like. A mare workabie plan wauld be �or the
residents to pay �ar 50� of Curb & gutter and yard
restoration, and �he City pick up the ather 50�.
"Attachmen� A", is a city program proposed by Staff that
cou�8 be used to encourage homeowners to go ta standard
design streets. It takes the finer points from the programs
of other cities and adjusts them �o our specific needs.
If Council decides that no encouragement is needed then there
still needs to be a decision made on how to use the
infrastructure funds. The �05t obvious ehoiae would be to
just give all streets, no matter which type, equal
assistance. The amaunt of the assistance would be based on
how much infrastructure funds the Council wishes to
accumulate each year divided by average number o� miles of
street that must be overlaid each year.
Aithough converting to aurbed streets would have high casts,
the benefits of s�reets that last 30 or more years rather
than the average of 20 years Ear rural streets, and reduced
maintenance requirements, wou2d be a valuable asset to the
future of the city.
Financinq '
The remainder of this discussion relates to the �unding
implications a� the proposed plan {attachment A}.
The cast to rehabilitate the blacktap on a street runs about
$150,000 per mile. The cost to add curb and gut�er including
the regrading of boulevards, driveway replacement, and yard
restoration is about $200,000 per mile. Sf storm sewer is
installed all the costs would be.asse�sed to the residents,
and the cost would be around $80,000 per mile. So to
completely reconstruct and upgrade a stre�t runs about
$430,000 per mile, or about $80 per foat of street.
Using the criteria set forth in Attachmen� A, the foZlowing
table shows the breakdown of costs per front foot between �
City assistance and assessmen�s far each af the items
involved in a street reaonstruction:
ZTEM �SSESSED AM4UNT CiT AMaUNT T4TAL COST
Street overlay
C&G and yard rest.
Storm Sewer
Total
Percentage
$10.40
$s.�o
$s.00
$26.50
�
$S,OQ
$s.5a
$13.50
34�
$15.00
SZ�.ao
Ss.ao
$40.00
100�
There are about 23 miles af sub-standard streets in the city,
so about one mile of street will need to be upgraded each
year for the next 20 or so years {assuming almost everyone
goes with the new plan). Thus the City will need abaut
$150,000 a� infrastruature funds per year until aIl the
streets are upgraded.
Of course things don'� end there. About the time most o� the
rural streets become standardized partions of existing curb
and gu�ter streets will need some rehabilitation. So a
permanent program is a must i� Council wishes to use city
funds to keep city streets in good condition.
r
To demonstrate more specif3cally haw a program like the ona
shawn in Attaahment A would work, an examination of the next
five years of same anticipated street repair projects is
presen�ed below. It is assumed that the residents request
assistance for the upgrade to a s�andard street and that the
funding plan presented in the attachment is used. �
YEAR
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
PR�JECT
Londan/Downing
Friendly Hills
Curley"s A�ea
CITY CdST ASSESSED TaTAL
54,40Q
400,000
a3o,oao
8Q,000
875,OQ0
47Q,000
13Q,000
1,275,000
704,Q00
Grand total 680,000 1,425,000 2,i05,000
Note that this is about one mile of reaonstruc�ion every
year, �
To put this in perspective, the efEects of this program on
the infrastructure fund should be examined. Attachment B and
C is a£unding scenario that cauld be used for the program.
Tt assumes that the current levy of $50,000 be maintained
thraugh 1991 then debt service is used after 1991.
The conclusion that can be drawn from �his funding
examinatian is that the inirastructure levy should be
maintained at 50,000 for now, but it should be increased in
the future in order ta cover the debt sexvice that will �
result from the use of debt financing �or the rehabilitatian
projects.
The ather funding option would be to just reduae the amaunt
of city assistance to a level that wauld not require an
increase in debt financing. There is no magic level of
funding that would work best for alI cases. Suffice it to
say that a reduction in street upgrading assistance would
reduce the city assistance ta a level less than 40� of street
cos�s and less than 25� af typica3 tatal project costs. As
s�ated befare, most cities provide 40-75� funding assistance.
Thus any significant redu�tian wil� reduae the impetus to
upgrade streets and will make assessment hearings less
friendly. �
Far jus� an overlay of an existing stree� that has curb and
gutt�r the praposed plan includes city assistance of 35�,
which is about the same as St. Lauis Park and some other
cities. Note hawever that some cities provide up ta 100%
assistanc�.
�ECOMMENDATION
Council must consider the overall goal of street
rehabilitation plan.
Staff recommends that Council adopt a street rehabili�ation
plan as described in Attachement A.
Staff recommends Council accept the debt financing plan
presented in Attachment B and C, as an acceptable method to
fund the program,
C� TTQN REQUIRED
Council should consider the presented material and staff's
recammendatians, then Cauncil shou2d �irect Staff to prepare
a resolution which would incorporate Gaunail's wishes
regarding the City's Infrastructure Replacement Program.
Note that the next Couna�l meeting will include a feasibility
report for the upgrading o� Wagon Wheel Trail. Many af the
proposals set farth in this memo were used in preparing �he
Wagan Wheel feasibility report. �
t
f
PROPOSED MENDt3TA HEIG�iTS REHABILITATIC}N PLAN
* Rural streets {those without curb and gutter) are
reconstructed at �.he expense of the residents (who have to
petition for the im�,zovement), and na guarantee on the
street repair is given. ,
* Rural streets can be upgraded to standard streets..
Residents must pay for all new utility casts like storm
sewer, 50� for new curb and gutter, and must pay $1o.OQ per
frant faot for the blacktop work. The city will pick up
the remainder of the construction costs. The new streets
are guaranteed for 20 years and the ci�y w3.11 aggressively
maintain them. �
* The $10.00 re�urfacing cast to the resident is changed
according to standard constructian cost indexes.
* Rural streets are maintained norma].ly, but as soon'as the
street reaches a high state of perpe�ual maintenance the
street is no ],onger maintained, and any work on the street
must be requested then assessed to the res3.dents.
* A pavement management system is used to monitor the
conditian of a21 existing streets.
* Existing streets that are up to standard are eligible far
city assistance, which amounts ta all overlay costs over
$10.00 per front foot. Thus residents on standard design
stree�s only pay $1U.00 per �oat for b].acktop overiay.
* The funds needed to caver the city assa.stance w�ll came
fram i.ncreased debt financing, which in turn will be
aovered by increased levies aver the years.
STANDARD STREET EU SIGN
-8618 concrete curb & gutter.
-33 feet face to face.
-3 1/2 inches of bituminous.
.
4 �
ATTACHMENT B
INFRASTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT FUNDING PROGRAM
Staff has considered the financial implications o� proposed
infrastructure replacement program and has come up with a
funding program with the fallowinq components:
* City should continue the annual levy of $50,040 far the
Infrastructure Replaaement Fund.
* Initially the IR fund can completel� fund improvement
projects. However since $50,000 is not enough to caver the
yearly cost, Debt Service also should be used ance the IR
fund is no langer capable of funding the entire project.
* Assuming the proposed five year plan is implemented the
IR fund would become inadequate halfway thraugh the
Friend2y hills project. So around 1992 additional debt
,service would have to be levied.
* Each year the levy required to cover construction costs
would increase by raughly $22,000 for every $500,440 �
project, unt�l around 20Q6, when it could be capped at a
level of $300,400 per year.
* Attachment "G"' shows this funding program in the form af a
table. �
This funding scenario assumes a canstruction schedule of
London/Downing in '90, Friendly Hi1.ls in '91-92, Curley's
in '93-94, and ane mile every year after that for another 15
years. Note that this program ignares the fact that the tax
base wi.11 be increasing throughout thi.s program, so it may be
that much af the increased ievy monies wil.l be realized from
the new tax ba�e.
Under normal circumstances i� will require Caunail to pass a
4/5 vote far these projects, because histaricaZly it has been
extremely difficult to obtain a 35� rate af petition.
Fi
I2iFFtASTRtICTU`�E SA.�PLE
FUhDING PROCRAM:
YEAR
s
�989
i990
1991
�og2
1993
�1994
qao�
'► 996
�997
1998
199R
��0�
2401
zooz
2003
2d0�
2005
zaa�
PROJECT TOTAL COST
Doc,�:ing �33Q,000.00
Frien3ly* Hills �1,275,000.00
Friendly I?i?.1s
Cu:ley $700,000.00
Ci:rley
�'u�ure �Spgrada � sao, aao, 00
Future IIpgrade $500,OOQ.OQ
Future �ipgrade $500,440.00
Futuxe Upgrade �500,000.00
Future IIpgrade $50Q,040,00
Future Upgrade $500,000.00
Future �ipgrade $SOO,OQ0.00
Future Upgre,ds �500,0OO.Op
Future IIpgrade W500,000.00
Futu�e i3P�=aae .500y440.00
Future Tipgrade 5500,OOQ.00
:l..t.�^e �iip�:BljE w�V{}�VQV.��
1st Five Ykars -Doxning
' Friendly Hills
Curley
Future - Estimate: 1 Mile Per Ysa.r
ASSESSED CZTY C05T INFRA. RFS
F'tii�D
$80,000.00 �50,000.00
$875,000.00 �400,000.00
���a,aaa.oa �z�a,aoa.00
. •• •s• •�
, �� �.. •.
. •• •�s •:
. �� •�• ••
. �• •�• ••
, �• •�• ••
•� ��• ••
� •i •ii ii
. •� •�• •�
. i! i{• ii
. •� ��• �•
i• i• ft
, •! •t• i�
. •� •�• ��
. !f f�i •!
, �• ��� •�
, •• •�� ••
� ii ii♦ ii
. •• •�� •�
ii iii •t
. •• •�M •�
. ss •�r s•
. �� •�• �•
. • !4• if
�175,000.00
�2z5,oao.00
$185,d00.00
S24p,000.00
�38,004.40
^�76,000.00
�i9,004.44
�0.00
$0.00
$ 0. d0
$Q.00
�0.00
$0»00
$4.00
$0.00
�4.40
50. o0
�o.ao
.
G.O. DEBT DEBT SERVICE
1 � 'Yft. PAXBACK
�.� • ii• ••
$150�000.00
$1$O,OOQ.QQ
�200,0OO.Od
�200,400.b0
$200,Od0.00
$200,000.00
$200a0Q0.00
$200,000.00
$200�OQ0.00
�20�����.Q�
�200,OOQ.04
�200,OQ0.00
��4Q}�OQ.�Q
•f• !f
�58,000.00
�79,aoo.ao
�'140, 000 . 00
�121,000.00
$142:000.00
$'f 61, 00{! . 00
$183: �►00. 00
$205,000.00
$227,Q00.00
�2�9r000.00
$270,000.00
sz�2,oaa.00
♦
v
4 •
i >
n'
♦
�
� ± •
CITY OF MEIJDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
February 13, 1992
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administrator
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Legislative Redistricting/Precinct Changes
INTRODUCTION
On January 31st, we received notification from the Secretary
of State that the legislative redistricting plan adopted during
the 1991 legislative session is finally in place, after many
months in court. We are now mandated to adopt a local
redistricting plan, including the establishment of election
precincts, by March 30th. The adopted plan will become effective
on September 15th, the date of the State Primary Election.
Mendota Heights is significantly impacted by the legislative
redistricting plan. This memo will briefly review that impact
and present for Council discussion the options for revised
precinct boundaries.
INFORMATION
For many years, Mendota Heights has been divided into two
legislative districts, Districts 38 and 39. All of the city east
of Victoria and north of T.H. 110 (city precincts 1, 4 and 5)
were in District 39; the remainder of the City was in District
38. The new boundary for District 39 encompasses all of the City
lying east of Wachtler and north of Wentworth plus the area
bounded on the west by Dodd Road and on the south by Marie
Avenue. The remainder of the city is in District 38.
All of precinct one remains in the District 39, however the
district line now divides precincts 4 and 5. City precincts
cannot cross legislative district boundaries. We are therefore
required to re-establish precinct lines to conform to the new
district boundaries. In the creation of the new precinct lines,
we may not divide census blocks. Needless to say, this is all
much easier said than done.
DISCUSSION
When we began the process of developing potential precinct
boundaries, we had several desired objectives in mind. The
primary objective was to arrive at a plan which would provide
good polling place facilities in locations as easily accessible
as possible to the majority of the residents residing within the
/
��
i �.
�
precincts. Distance to a polling place was less of a factor in
this goal than were vehicular safety considerations and parking
and facility size. Another objective was to arrive at a fairly
equal distribution of registered voter population in each of the
precincts, while at the same time addressing anticipated future
growth in the precincts. The city currently owns one ballot
counter for each of the six precincts and one extra counter which
serves as an emergency back-up unit. Considering the cost of the
machines and their maintenance contract, another goal has been to
limit the number of precincts to no more than six.
Given the foregoing objectives, we have prepared a number of
options for new precinct boundaries. Maps depicting those
options are attached. Many other precinct configurations have
also been considered. Although each of the attached options has
inherent advantages and disadvantages, the maps we are presenting
are the most viable of all which were considered. We have
attached an information sheet to each of the drawings so that
Council is apprized of what staff considers to be the advantages
and disadvantages of each. When reviewing the options, please
bear in mind that we are restricted from dividing census blocks,
which is the reason why many of the boundary lines look quite
strange.
I am presenting this information so that Council can, on
Tuesday evening, review and discuss each of the options and
arrive at a consensus on which is the most appropriate. The
city's redistricting plan and precinct boundary map will then be
put in final form for adoption as part of the consent calendar on
March 5th.
None of the options is perfect. Each will impact a
significant number of registered voters - many will be shifted to
different polling places, and some will be impacted by a gr-�ater
distance to their polling place. The final map in the packet of
options is my preferred option, and the one I recommend. The
reasons for the recommendation are detailed in the map
attachment.
ACTION REQUIRED
Council should review the precinct options and direct staff
to prepare a local redistricting plan reflecting Council
consensus on precinct boundaries. _
DISTRICT 38
OPTION ONE
Registered Voter Population:
Precinct 3
Precinct 4
Precinct 5
Precinct 6
Advantages:
The precinct
existing lines.
polling places i
Disadvantages:
1453
1574
730
1129
boundary lines are very similar to the
Fewer voters would be shifted to new
n this scheme than in other schemes.
This plan envisions use of the Fire Station as a
polling place for precinct 5. Access to the station is the
least safe of any of our polling places. The station was
woefully inadequate for use as a polling place in 1990 in
terms of facility size and parking capacity. Even with the
help of volunteer firefighters for traffic control, we
received numerous voter complaints. For this reason, the
registered voter population in this option is purposely very
low. Parking lot congestion would continue to be a problem
in the evening. There is little future growth potential for
the precinct as drawn. Given the expense of running a
pol].ing place (judges salaries, supplies, etc.), it is not
cost effective to maintain a polling place with such a small
voter population.
� � �.
. �_�_�
,• �
" �-
�
DISTRICT 38
OPTION TWO
Registered Voter Population:
Precinct 3 1041
Precinct 4 1607
Precinct 5 1597
Precinct 6 641 �
Advantages:
The boundary line for precinct 3 has been drawn so that
residents between I-35E and Victoria would have better polling
place access (formerly they voted at Sibley High School). Voters
in precinct 3 would remain at their existing polling place.
Al1 of the area south of T.H. 110 would be divided into two
precincts and residents would vote at polling places south of the
highway. We have been trying without success to contact
officials of St. Thomas Academy. Preliminary contact with
Visitation has been quite positive.
The Fire Station would not be used as a polling place.
The low voter population in precinct 6 provides for anticipated
growth without the future need for division of the precinct.
Disadvantages:
The population in precinct 3 is much smaller than I would
like it to be, and is not balanced with the population in
precinct 4. Providing judges for precinct 5 would require
splitting three extremely good teams of judges (from existing
precincts 2, 3 and 6), a situation which I would like to avoid if
at all possible.
This option envisions a future voting population in excess
of 2,500 people in the two precincts. Though certainly not a
traffic expert, I would be very reluctant to recommend forcing
such a large volume of traffic into the Dodd/Mendota Heights Road
intersection and directing them to two facilities in such close
proximity. Knowing problems we encountered with traffic at the
fire station in 1990, I can envision very serious future
circulation problems in this option.
DISTRICT 38
OPTION THREE
Registered Voter Population:
Precinct 3 1453
Precinct 4 1311
Precinct 5 993
Precinct 6 1129
Advantages•
The population balance in precincts 3 and 4 is very good.
Precinct 4 is the same as the existing precinct 3, so one
existing precinct would remain entirely in tact.
Disadvantages•
This option envisions use of the Fire Station. As was noted
in Option 1, I would prefer not to use the station as a polling
place because of space and parking constraints. This option
envisions nearly 250 more voters than option 1, which would be
too many, in my opinion, for the facility to handle. The
population count is also quite a bit lower than I would like.
�
0
. "�<�
�,_ :� -
DISTRICT 38
OPTION FOUR
Registered Voter Population:
Precinct 3 1407
Precinct 4 1375
Precinct 5 1343
Precinct 6 796
Advantaaes:
The population balance in all precincts is extremely good.
All of the polling places will accommodate the existing and
�anticipated voter counts nicely. When fully developed, Precinct
6 will be very close to the size of the other three precincts,
and there will not be a need for future division and the
associated cost of an additional Optech unit.
Although the boundary between precincts 3 and four is
unique, (necessitated by census block use) it allows us to use
two existing polling places - Mendota School and Royal Redeemer
Lutheran Church. With the exception of the Curley Addition and
Eagle Ridge, all of the residents within the proposed two
precincts currently vote at one of these two polling places.
The fire station would not be used as a polling place.
Disadvantages•
In my opinion, there is only one, most probably obvious,
disadvantage. This option envisions bringing residents of the
Friendly Hills area across T.H. 110 to vote. After listening to
the numerous complaints about use of the fire station in 19-90,
however, I do not believe there would be overwhelming citizen
objection.
�
DISTRICT 39
OPTION ONE
Registered Voter Population
Precinct 1 1235
Precinct 2 820
Advantages• �
This option retains the existing Precinct 1 boundaries.
Residents would continue to vote at Somerset School, and no
notice of polling place change would be required.
Disadvantages•
The population in precinct 2 is much smaller than I would
like it to be, and is not balanced with the population in
precinct 1. Running a polling place as small as precinct 2 would
not be cost effective. There is very little growth potential in
either precinct, therefore a future division or change in
precinct boundaries is unlikely.
�
. �
�-
. �
'i-`.
DISTRICT 39
OPTION TWO
Registered Voter Population
Precinct 1 1000
Precinct 2 1055
Advantages•
This option provides an equivalent distribution of the
District 39 population between precincts.
Disadvantaaes:
The population in both of the precincts is smaller than is
desirable. The precinct boundaries are very odd, dictated by
census blocks, and highly illogical. This is the only
configuration possible if we are to provide a balance of
population.
0
�
DISTRICT 39
OPTION THREE
Registered Voter Population
Precinct 1 2055
Advantages•
This option keeps neighborhoods in tact and allows a
reduction in the number of necessary polling places. The
resultant cost savings could be significant. The option allows
us the flexibility in assigning polling place locations to the
remaining precincts.
Consolidating District 39 is desirable in terms of
processing the election. Only one ballot would be required for
the district, minimizing the potential for error in the
distribution and .processing of absentee ballots, and reducing
some of the preparation and testing and ballot layout work
associated with election processing.
Disadvantaaes:
The population in the single precinct is larger than I would
like. We have not been able to convince the School District to
allow us to use the Sibley gym, and our only real polling place
alternative is Somerset School. Although Somerset will
accommodate the voter population, I am concerned about parking.
We have, however, tentatively received agreement from the School
District that the staff of the school will use the rear parking
lot and most of the main lot will be allocated for election use.
Because many of the residents in the area are retired; much
of the voting at Somerset in the past has occurred during the
day, and there has rarely been any problem with long lines or
parking difficulties.
�= "`';.
�1� E�a��� �4
a
c
RECOMMENDED OPTION
The attached plan represents my recommendation for the
city's local redistricting/precinct plan. Although it is not
perfect, it is in my opinion, the best option.
Precinct 1 (District 39)
District 39 is consolidated into a single precinct, with
Somerset School as the polling place. The large registered voter
count is of concern, however, since this plan actually reduces
the number of existing precincts it allows us the flexibility of
splitting precinct 1 in the future if parking problems are
significant.
Precints 3
Precinct 3 presents the disadvantage of bringing voters
across T.H. 110 to vote. In my opinion, however, although there
will be greater distance to a polling place for the voters, a
polling place north of the highway would be far superior to the
fire station.
If we were to be successful in gaining permission to use
both St. Thomas and Visitation as polling places, I would
continue to believe that bringing the Friendly Hills area to a
northern polling place would be preferable to bringing such a
large volume of traffic (area south of T.H. 110) into the
Dodd/Mendota Heights Road intersection and to facilities so close
together as Visitation and St. Thomas.
General Comments
This option provides the best balance of voter populations.
It gives us flexibility in determining polling places, ar�cl
provides for future growth. It is the most cost effective of all
of the possible options and the most efficient for election
processing.
Polling Places
Precinct 1
Precinct 2
Precinct 3
Precinct 4
Precinct 5
- Somerset School
- Royal Redeemer Lutheran Church
- Mendota School
- Sibley High School or
St. Paul's Methodist Church
- Visitation Convent or
St. Thomas Academy
:f �;
.y
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
February 14, 1992
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Ad '
FROM: James E. ��1s
Public Works D' r
SUBJECT: Snow Plowing Policy
DISCUSSION:
At the February 4, 1992 meeting Council reviewed a draft snow plowing policy. At
that meeting Council made several suggested improvements. I have attempted to incorporate
all those improvements into the policy (see attached policy with changes underlined).
One of the recommended changes in the policy, is that the City go to four snow plow
routes. We have already implemented that change by using the grader. The grader although
it is a good piece of equipment for plowing, is not as efficient as a truck. The grader also
does not have sandi.ng capability, this requires that a dump truck go over the route after it
has been plowed and sand.
Because -of the long lead time between orderi.ng and receiving dump trucks (6-8
months) I suggest that we order another truck and plow now. That will mean. that the City
will have the truck available for next winter's plowing season. Larry Shaughnessy informs
me that he will have equipment certif'icate money available sometime in October and that he
could easily include enough money for purchase of the truck. Our future levy for equipment
certificates will be such that there would he no increase in tax levy.
RECOMIVV�NDATION:
I recommend that Council adopt the attached Snow Plowing Policy and authorize the
purchase of a fourth truck with a snowplow.
ACTION REQUIItED•
Discuss the Snow Plowing Policy, determine any changes and then if Council desires
to implement the recommendation, pass a motion adopting the policy. Council also needs to
determine if they desire to proceed with the purchase of the forth snowplow route truck at
this time.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
SNOW PLOWING POLICY
I. INTRODIICTION
February 18, 1992
� ►
The City of Mendota Heights believes that it is in the best
interest of the residents for the City of Mendota Heights to
assume basic responsibility for controlling snow and ice on City
streets. Reasonable ice and snow control is necessary for
routine travel and emergency services. The City will provide
such control in a safe and cost effective manner, keeping in mind
safety, budget, personnel and environmental concerns. The City
will use City employees and equipment.
II. OBJECTIVE
It is the goal of the City to restore mobility to the City
as quickly as possible under all snowfall events.
III. �fiEN WILL CITY START SNOqP OR ICE CONTROL OPER.ATIONS?
The Public Works Superintendent or his designated represen-
tative will determine when to begin snow or ice control opera-
tions. The criteria for that decision are:
A. Snow removal of two (2) inches or more will begin as soon as
possible after the snowfall ends.
�
snow has not stopped, snow removal operations will begin-�x�t
2:00 A.M. with the objective to get the City's main roads
cleared and sanded for safe travel before the morning rush
hour traffic begins.
C. Drifting of snow that causes problems for travel.
D. Removal of extraordinary snowfalls will be conducted in such
a fashion as to restore City mobility as soon as possible.
E. Icy conditions which affect travel.
F. Time of snowfall in relationship to heavy use of streets.
IV . HOL� SNOW WILL Bl3 PLOOPED?
Snow will be plowed in a manner so as to minimize any
traffic obstructions. On standard residential streets the snow
will be cleared by two passes of the snowplows. On collector
streets where the streets are wider than a standard residential
width, the center of the roadway will be plowed first. The snow
shall then be pushed from left to right. The discharge shall go
'� i
v.
vi.
onto the boulevard area of the street. When a plow travels
across a bridge, the driver shall slow down to prevent snow from
going over the bridge if possible. In times of extreme snowfall,
streets will not always immediately be able to be completely
cleared of snow. Plowing of cul-de-sacs will start at the same
time as the streets and be completed along with them. Where
possible, cul-de-sac snow will be plowed to the center
The most efficient snow plow routes will be determined for
each area and then those routes will be plowed the same way every
storm. This will allow residents to better �ge when they will
be plowed out each storm.
SNOW REMOVAL
The Public Works Superintendent or the Road & Bridge Lead-
person will determine when snow will be removed by truck from the
area. Such snow removal will occur in areas where there is no
room on the boulevard for snow storage and in areas where accumu-
lated piles of snow create a hazardous condition. Snow removal
operations will not commence until other snow plowing operations
have been completed. Snow removal operations may also be delayed
depending on weather conditions, personnel and budget availabili-
ty. The snow will be removed and hauled to a snow storage area.
The snow storage area will be located so as to minimize environ-
mental problems.
PRIORITILS AND SCHEDIILE FOR DPHICH STREETS WILL BE PLOWED
The City has classified City streets based on the street
function, traffic volume, and importance to the welfare of the
community. Those streets classified as "snow plow routes" will
be plowed first. These are high volume streets which connect
major sections of the City and provide access for emergency fire,
police and medical services. The streets listed below will be
plowed first. �
A. Snow Plow Routes South of Highway 110
Mendota Heights Road
Decorah Avenue
Huber Drive
Lake Drive
Wagon Wheel Trail
B. Snow Plow Routes North of Highway 110 (Middle Area)
Marie Avenue
Freeway Road (Frontage Road)
Victoria Curve
�Il „�12.uF+��, ._2,.v�� 9'^�"�- C1 `^�"`-�i , -2°1u`,"'@""`'e�`'..�
�2 �`-��,`'`'`"�-� � .�-� c-J� ,�-.� �c. cs7�i� o�
�
V� VJ O-Lii� ✓"'� �" "'J �
I.
VIII.
IX.
X.
C. Snow Plow Routes North of Highway 110 (North Area)
Chippewa Avenue
Sylvandale Road
Maple Park Drive
Emerson Avenue
Other major roadways in the City are under the jurisdiction
of either the State of Minnesota or Dakota County and are plowed
in accordance with their specific snow removal policies.
�IORK SCHEDIILE FOR SNOWPLOW OPERATORS
j t
Work schedules for City maintenance employees assigned to
operate snow removal equipment will be in accordance with the
t recent public works labor agreement,. r �� ���,
�d6ca�, c�' �s �
si�ifts . , vere -
. � To help insure i
safe operations of snow removal, operators will take a fifteen
minute break every two hours with a half hour meal break after �
four hours.
WEATHER CONDITIONS
Snow and ice control operations may be delayed or suspended
when weather conditions severely jeopardize the safety of City
employees and equipment. Factors that may delay snow and ice
control operations include severe cold, significant winds and
limited visibility.
IISL OF SAND . SALT APTD � OTHE:R CSEMICALS
The City will use sand, salt, and other chemicals where
hazardous ice and slippery conditions exist. The City is con-
cerned about the effect of such chemicals on the environment and
for that reason will attempt to limit their use where possible.
SIDEWALKS - PED�AYS
The City will not remove snow from concrete sidewalks in the
City. Bituminous pedways will be cleared by City crews after all
City streets have been cleared. Priority will be given to
pedways which serve as primary walking routes to public schools.
XI. PROPERTY DAMAGE
The City accepts responsibility for structures which are
obvious or are marked and which have been damaged by physically
being struck by a plow blade, wing or other piece of equipment.
Ma.ilboxes, lights, etc. should be constructed well enough to
withstand the impact of snow rolling off a plow or a wing.
Damage resulting from being struck by snow is the responsibility
'L
of the residen�s.
The City will repair, replace or reimburse the residents in
tho�e instances where the City is responsible for the damage,
The City will have the option to repair ar replace and will only
reimburse the cost of material� in the instances where i�. is in
the City' best interes�. Lawn� damaged by Ci�.y equipmen�. wi1.l be
repaired by sodding or topdres�ing and seeding to match existing
1awn. Residen�.s are encou.raged to assist with lawn repairs.
XII. RESPONSIBZLITY OF RESSDENTS
The re�idents will also have cer�.ain responsibilities.
These include clearing thea.r own driveway�, areas for trash cans
should be e�tablished at least eight (8) ieet from curb 1�.ne,
around mailboxe�, newspaper tubes and iire hydran�s adjacent to
their property. These areas should be cleared wi�hou� depositing
any snow in�.o the street. There also mus�. not be any large piles
which obstruct vision of driveways. Trash cans must not be
placed on the s�reet surfaces. The City will not clear private
driveways.
Repair and ar replacement of bushes and other landsca�inQ
material which has been in�talled within the City's boulevard
area are the responsibilit�r of the proper�.y owner if damage
occurs �rom snow plowing. Sand that has been deposited in the
boulevard area by plowing aperations is also the responsibilit�
of �he property owner.
_
Snow plowing can cause additional snow to be deposi�ed in
driveway approaches and araund roadside obstacles. Operators are
ins�.ructed to attempt to mznimize these instances. Residents
should be aware they ma.y have �o clear their driveway� a�econd
�.ime after their street ha� been plowed.
XxII. SNOW PLOD�ING INFORMAT=ON
In order �.o keep the City's residen�s as up to date on
�naw plowing iniorma.tion as possible. a phone message machine
will be put in aperation at the Public Works Garag,e and City Hall
during periads when City oifices a.re elosed. This machine will
contain snow plow upda�.e intormatian including a phone number to
�all for emergencies. The ma.chine wiZ1 also have the a.bilitv to
�ake recorded messages. The Public Works Su�erin�endent will
check messages every hour durinc� snow �all events.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
February 18, 1992
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Adminis
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Presidential Primary
Polling Place/Election Judge Resolution
INFORMATION
The Presidential Primary Election will be held on Tuesday,
April 7th, barring a legislative over-ride of the Governor's
veto. Normal elections are very costly and time consuming to
process. The Presidential Primary will be no exception, however
it is likely that the voter turn-out will be significantly
smaller than a regular election. In an effort to reduce costs
and make the process as easy as possible, I will herein present a
request for consideration of a consolidated polling place for the
Presidential Primary. It is also necessary to gain approval of a
resolution designating election judges for the primary. The
second part of this memo will discuss election judge appointment.
DISCUSSION
State Statute allows third and fourth class cities to use a
single, centrally located facility as a polling place for all of
its precincts. Although this approach would be unfeasible for
normal elections, the Secretary of State's predicted turnout for
the Presidential Primary (30% of registered voters) is such that
a large single polling place would work well. -
When first considering the possibility, our concern was two-
fold - the requirement for a centralized location, and the need
for adequate parking. I believe that one facility will meet all
of our needs. That facility is the Mendota Plaza shopping
Center. It provides more than adequate parking and is centrally
located. Additionally, the space formerly occupied by the Coast
to Coast store is available and is of adequate size. I have
contacted John Streeter, of Paster Enterprises, with a tentative
request to use the facility. He felt that it would be a mutually
beneficial use and discussed the request with Ed Paster, who was
delighted with the idea. The Old America store is scheduled to
open on April 2nd, and he felt that election traffic past the
store would be most helpful. If the facility is used as the
single polling place, there will be no charge.
,� Council must adopt a resolution appointing election judges
at least thirty days prior to an election. If the single polling
e
place option is authorized, the number of judges required for the
process will be reduced dramatically. Forty judges would be
needed to run six polling places plus the absentee ballot
precinct. We would need a maximum of sixteen judges if the
single polling place option is approved.
I have attached a resolution to appoint judges for the 1992
elections, which, if adopted, will be effective for the
Presidential Primary, State Primary and General Election. If
Council chooses to utilize the single polling place approach for
the Presidential Primary, only sixteen of those judges will be
requested to serve.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that
Shopping Center as the
Election and adopt the
judges.
ACTION RE4UIRED
Council designate the Mendota Plaza
polling place for the Presidential Primary
attached resolution appointing election
If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should move
adoption of Resolution No. 92-13, "RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION
JUDGES," and Resolution No. 92-14 "RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SINGLE
POLLING PLACE FOR PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION."
-i •
.!
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SINGLE POLLING PLACE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION
Whereas, it is anticipated that voter turn-out for the
April 7, 1992 Presidential Primary election will not exceed
30� of the registered voters of the City; and
Whereas, the cost for operating six election polling
places is significant; and
Whereas, the use of schools for election precinct
polling places disrupts scheduled school activities; and,
Whereas, State Statutes 204B.16 allows cities of the
third or fourth class to designate a single polling place to
serve as the voting location for all precincts located
within said cities;
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the Mendota
Plaza Shopping Center be designated as the Polling Place for
all city election precincts for the 1992 Presidential
Primary Election.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights
this 18th day of February, 1992.
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
m
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
a
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION N0. 92-
WHEREAS, State Statutes require that appointment of election Judges
must be made by City council resolution; and
WHEREAS, the following list of persons has been submitted as qualified
election judge candidates for the 1992 Presidential and State Primary
Elections: �
PRECINCT NO. l.
D June Wagner
R Rita Green
D Edwina Burrows
R Sally Countryman
D Eileen Mullen
PRECINCT N0. 2.
D Laurita Weinzettel
D Rita Maczko
R Virginia Simek
R Nancy Kruse
D Carol Redding
Hubert Meier
PRECINCT N0. 3.
D Jean Fransen
D Mary Hartz
R Cynthia Klecatsky
R Annabel Randolph
D Lois Fulong
PRECINCT NO. 4.
D Marjorie cheesebrow
D Pat Hetinger
R Theresa Esslinger
D Dolores Radabough
R Rosemary Hildebrant
Eileen Rosenbaum
R Caroline McDuff
PRECINCT N0. 5.
R Janan Gainor
D Rosemary Murphy
R Bill Burke
R Evelyn Fisher
D Ray Burrows
R Rebecca Pentel
1392 Farmdale Road
1134 Ivy Hill Dr.
681 First Ave.
648 Ivy Falls Drive
1126 N. Kingsley Ci.
2140 Dodd Road
907 Cheri Lane
814 Hazel Court
902 Cheri Lane
2331 Puebol Lane
795 Keokuk
2170 Pilot Knob
2200 Pilot Knob
1078 Theresa
541 W. Emerson
2230 Hwy 55
594 W. Marie
658 Callahan Place
632 Callahan Place
653 W. Marie
1783 Delaware
1850 Eagle Ridge Dr.
651 So. Freeway Road
1769 Lansford Lane
1696 James Road
707 Decorah Lane
1733 Lansford Lane
681 First Ave.
815 Deer Trail Court
451-6199
455-5842
457-6658
457-4770
454-6060
454-4659
454-1628
454-6247
454-3854
452-4896
454-2165
Co-Captain
Captain
452-1390 Captain
454-7602
457-3863
452-1620 -
454-1140
454-3150
454-1132
454-3190
454-2432
452-9689
454-4514
452-2108
454-1880
454-3464
454-7194
457-6658
688-6868
Captain
Captain
i7
�ECINCT NO. 6.
Marsha Knuth
Ma.ry Ann Hoyt
Darlene Misner
Linda Weinzettel
Charlotte Henry
Marilyn Nelson
740 Mohcian
2276 Apache
706 Ocala
2202 Aztec
1965 Knob Road
894 Wagon Wheel
ABSENTEE OR ALTERNATE JUDGES
R Sue Guiton
D Pat Burke
D Betty Moen
R Larry Shaughnessy
R Ralph Johnson
454-7053 Captain
454-3432
454-2262
454-6013
454-1450
454-1624
822 Ridge Place 454-1418
707 Decorah Lane 454-3463
2319 Swan Drive 454-7985
27 Dorset Road 457-1100
1280 Dodd Road 457-4233
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights that the preceding list of candidates are designated as 1992
Election Judges.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 18th day of
February, 1992
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
.