Loading...
1992-04-07CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGLNDA April 7, 1992 - 8:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call . 3. Agenda Adoption � 4. Approval of January 30th Workshop Minutes March 5th Minutes 5. Consent Calendar a. Acknowledgment of the February 25th Planning Commission Minutes. b. Acknowledgment of the draft March 24th Planning Commission Minutes. c. Acknowledgment of the March Building Report. d. Approval to Hire Public Works Summer Help. e. Approval to Begin Selection Process for a New Full-Time Maintenance Worker. f. Approval of RLSOLIITION No. 92-21, A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE R.AAK LOT DIVISION AT 724 WENTWORTH AVENUE. g. Approval of 3.2 Malt Liquor License (Off Sale) - Tom Thumb Food Markets. h. Approval of the List of Contractors. � i. Approval of the List of Claims. j. Acknowledgment of House Fire Summary k. Acknowledgment of Update on Downtown Mendota Heights Ringroad. * l. Acknowledgment of the Trunk Highway 13/I-35E Cooperative Agreement RESOLIITION NO. 92-22. . Snd of Conseat Calendar 6. Public Comments a. Air Noise - Mr. Joe Meagher 7. IInfinished and New Business a. CASE N0. 92-06: Henry Sibley Senior High School - Sign Variance b. CASE N0. 92-05: Centre Pointe Medical Clinic - � Sign Variance � c. Discussion on Mendota Interchange Project d. Building Permit and Site Plan Approval for United Properties - VGC Corporation - � RESOLIITION NO. 92-23 e. CASE N0. 92-02: The Rottlund Homes - Rezoning, CUP for PUD, Subdivision f. Discussion on Funding Mechanisms for Ivy Creek and other Storm Water Projects. g. Discussion on BARR Engineering Storm Water Studies . c h. Approval of Kensington Park Plans � i. Discussion on Traffic Counts - Mendota Heights Road/ Dodd Road j. Discussion on Curley Trail k. Discussion on St. Paul Water Utility Contract 1. Discussion on Excel Payment Request 8. Couacil Comments 9 . Ad j ourn � � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS April 7, 1992 T0: Ma.yor and City Council . FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administra�� � SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for April 7th Council Meeting One new item has been added to the Consent Calendar (*). 3. AQenda Adoption It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda printed on green paper. 51. Acknowledgment of the Trunk Highway 13/I-35E Cooperative -� AQreement See attached Agreement and Resolution. MTL:kkb 8 � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAROTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA April 7, 1992 - 8:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call ; . ,l 3. Agenda Adoption 4. Approval of January 30th Workshop Minutes March 5th Minutes RECEIVED APR 0 61992 THOMAS M. HARt �. :, e 5. Consent Calendar a. Acknowledgment of the February 25th Planning Commission Minutes. b. Acknowledgment of the draft March 24th Planning Commission Minutes. c. Acknowledgment of the March Building Report. d. Approval to Hire Public Works Summer Help. e. Approval to Begin Selection Process for a New Full-Time Maintenance Worker. f. Approval of RESOLUTION No. 92-21, A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE RAAK LOT DIVISION AT 724 WENTWORTH AVENUE. g. Approval of 3.2 Malt Liquor License (Off Sale) - Tom Thumb Food Markets.• h. Approval of the List of Contractors. i. Approval of the List of Claims. j. Acknowledgment of House Fire Summary k. Acknowledgment of Update on Downtown Mendota Heights Ringroad. End of Consent Calendar 6. Public Commeats a. Air Noise - Mr. Joe Meagher 7. IInfinished and New Business a. CASE NO. 92-06: Henry Sibley Senior High School - Sign Variance � c. CASE N0. 92-05: Centre Pointe Medical Clinic - Sign Variance Discussion on Mendota Interchange Project � m _ d. Building Permit and Site Plan Approval for United Properties - VGC Corporation - RESOLIITION NO. 92-22 e. CASE NO. 92-02: The Rottlund Homes - Rezoning, _ CUP for PUD, Subdivision f. Discussion on Funding Mechanisms for Ivy Creek and , other Storm Water Projects. g. Discussion on�BA�2R Engineering Storm Water Studies � h. Approval of Kensington Park Plans �� �'� • i. Discussion on Traffic Counts - Mendota Heights Road/ Dodd Road j. Discussion on Curley Trail k. Discussion on St. Paul Water Utility Contract 1. Discusaion on Excel Payment Request 8. Council Commeats 9. Adjoura � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAROTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNFsSOTA Minutes of the Adjourned Meeting City Council/Planning Commission Workshop Held Thursday, Jaauary 30, 1992 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the special meeting/workshop of the City Council and Planning Commission, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Cummins, Blesener, Smith and Koch. The following Planning Commissioners present were: Duggan, Koll, Krebsbach, Dwyer, Friel and Tilsen. Staff inembers present were City Administrator Tom Lawell, Public Works Director Jim Danielson and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser. DISCIISSION DaITH NIl�TDOT REGARDING T.H. 110/149 INTERSLCTION City Administrator Lawell introduced MnDOT Representatives Mr. Bob Brown, Planner, and Mr. Adeel Lari, Right-of-Way Engineer. City Administrator Lawell explained that when Mr. Edward Paster purchased the Mendota Plaza he hired a traffic consultant to work with MnDot to develop a plan to improve the access to the center. He explained that this traffic engineer and MnDOT had developed a plan that would widen and add turn lanes to Dodd Road. Administrator Lawell stated that in 1990 Mr. Paster requested the City to investigate the possibility of constructing this plan as a public improvement project. He stated the City Council approved Mr. Paster's request and City staff has been working with MnDOT in trying to finalize a workable plan. Mr. Brown explained that there are now two alternative plans . He stated the first plan' s obj ective is to improve access into the shopping by adding proper turn lanes . He explained that the turn lanes will be created to improve the channeling and storing of vehicles traveling on Dodd Road. In response to a question from Planning Chair Dwyer, Mr. Brown stated that with the new plan, south bound traffic will be unable to turn left into the Amoco gas station. He stated access to the gas station is proposed to be via the shopping center entrance. Mr. Brown further stated the traffic volumes on Dodd Road are stagnate. He stated the rate of growth in the area is at 2 to 3 percent annually. Mayor Mertensotto stated the City needs to review this plan to see if it is a cost effective plan. He stated improvements to this highway may not be worthwhile. Mr. Brown stated the intent of these upgrades is to improve access to the shopping center. Mayor Mertensotto stated part of the problem the shopping center may have in not being able to lease tenant space may be related to the accessibility problem of the shopping center. Commissioner Tilsen stated the perception of accessibility to the shopping center may improve if the traffic flow to the shopping center is improved. He atated people like convenience and that this plan improves that. Councilmember Blesener stated she believes people do not have a problem accessing the shopping center. The problem with the center is that it has poor visibility and that the market just isn't there. Councilmember Cummins stated his concern for the safety for people heading east off of Highway 110, turning right heading south onto Dodd Road and then to the shopping center. He stated by only having one lane leading into the shopping center, could cause a real safety problem. Commissioner Koll pointed out the existing problem of bus stoppings in this location. Mayor Mertensotto asked what the total cost of the project could be. Public Works Director Danielson responded that it could be $1 million and that MnDOT's share of construction costs could be down to 25 percent of the proj ect . Mr. Brown briefly explained the second proposed plan. He stated this plan would be beneficial to both the City and State in that Dodd Road could be rerouted along the new City Municipal State Aid (MSA) route. He explained the City would complete the work using MSA funds and then once the work is completed and paid for, turn the roadway over to MnDot. He explained this alternative would relieve the City of any future maintenance, construction or reconstruction costs associated with the new roadway, and help MnDOT by improving traffic flow on Highway 110. Mr. Brown explained the signals on Highway 110 would be removed thereby decreasing the impedance on Highway 110. He further explained there would be right in/right out accessibility off of Highway 110 heading both east and west. He explained traffic heading north and south on Dodd Road would be routed using the overpass constructed around the shopping center. In response to a question from Councilmember Smith, Mr. Brown stated access to 35E from the north (using Dodd Road) would be made more difficult. Commissioner Tilsen questioned if a "diamond" intersection at Highway 110 and Dodd Road could be constructed. He stated the City of Bloomington has these intersections, several of which were recently constructed. Mr. Adeel Lari, MnDOT, explained these types of intersections are very costly. He explained those particular intersections have been proposed since ��• ` the 1950's at this location. Councilmember Blesener questioned if a loop could be created through the downtown Mendota Heights area. She stated the City is not interested in extending roads through the Friendly Hills area. Mr. Brown explained that safety is a real issue in proposing exit ramps. Planning Chair Dwyer stated this proposal seems to isolate the shopping center instead of improving accessibility. Commissioner Krebsbach stated accessibility to the shopping center does not seem to be an issue. She stated that traffic congestion just isn't the problem. The Council and Planning Commission briefly discussed how land would be acquired if the City chose to use the second alternate plan. Commissioner Tilsen expressed his concern for the lack of pedestrian trailway connecting the north and south sides of Mendota Heights. He inquired as to the capability of constructing pedestrian trailways in conjunction with the overpass plan. Mayor Mertensotto stated he would like to improve the access to the shopping center and that connecting the trail system (north to south) is important. In response to a question from Councilmember Smith, Mr. Lari explained it is assumed that only local residents use the shopping center. Commissioner Friel explained a lot of people use Highway 110 as the principal access road throughout the City. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that by constructing this overpass it may create more traffic on the residential streets within the City. Mayor Mertensotto questioned if there are appraisers available to review the possibility of the City acquiring land. Mr. Lari responded they are available. He further explained the process of appraising the land could take roughly a month. Councilmember Blesener stated she would like to see the City's Planning Consultant review all potential alternatives involving the accessibility to the shopping center and the upgrade of Dodd Road. Councilmember Cummins stated the first priority of the City should be to improve the safety of the intersection in conjunction with the safety concern relating to the accessibility of the shopping center. Mayor Mertensotto directed staff to contact John Uban, of Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban, to prepare a proposal, with a not to exceed dollar amount, researching traffic flows, availability of land and the connection of pedestrian trailways all relating to the downtown Mendota Heights area. He further directed Mr. Adeel Lari, MnDOT, to contact the State's appraisers to research the appraised value of the vacant Trunk Highway 149 right-of-way. ADJOIIRNMENT There being no further business, the Council and Planning Commission adj ourned the workshop session at 9: 05 0' clock P.M. Respectfully submitted, Kimberlee K. Blaeser Senior Secretary E . • Page No. 3235 March 5, 1992 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, March 5, 1992 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. . The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins, Koch and Smith. , AGENDA ADOPTION Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of the revised agenda for the meeting. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the minutes of the February 4, 1992 regular meeting with corrections. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 , � Nays: 0 , Councilmember Koch moved approval minutes of the February 18, 1992 meeting with correction. Councilmember Smith seconded the Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Abstain: 1 Blesener of the regular motion. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Koch moved approval of the consent calendar for the meeting along with authorization for execution of any�necessary documents contained therein. a. Acknowledgment of the Code Enforcement , monthly report for February. , b. Approval of an "Agreement Between the County of Dakota and the City of Mendota � Heights for Cost Sharing of Aerial Photography and Stereo Digitizing," at a cost to the City of $16,900, along with . authorization for execution of the � agreement by the Mayor, and award of a purchase order to the Gorman Company in the amount of $2,000, for ground control Ayes: 5 � Nays : 0 BID AWARD - MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD Page No. 3236 March 5, 1992 surveying. Costs for the aerial topography and ground surveying are to be distributed equally to the Engineering, Planning and Utility Fund budgets. c. Acknowledgment of a notice of water rate increase from the St. Paul Water � Department. d. Authorization to direct NDC-4 to begin telecasting Planning Commission meetings. e. Adoption of Resolution No. 92-16, "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR PINE CREEK ESTATES." � f. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated March 5, 1992 and attached hereto. g. Approval of the list of claims dated March 5, 1992 and totalling $197,028.55. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Council acknowledged a tabulation of bids received for improvements to Mendota Heights Road from Lexington Avenue to Dodd Road. Councilmember Smith asked whether the improvements will extend to Dodd Road and if the project will change the configuration of the Dodd/Mendota Heights Road intersection. She expressed concern over safety at the intersection. Public Works Director Danielson responded that the intersection was improved by Mn/DOT several years ago and that the current improvement project will stop at Visitation Drive. He informed Council that traffic counters have been placed at the intersection and that staff will report to Council as soon as data is available. Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No. 92-17, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAINS, STORM SEWERS, STREETS AND PEDWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD (IMPROVEMENT NO. 91, PROJECT NO. 4)," awarding Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 92-05, CENTRE POINTE SIGN Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 3237 March 5, 1992 the contract to Tower Asphalt for their low bid of $562,448.60. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Council acknowledged a report from regarding an application for sign variance from the Centre Pointe Medical Clinic and a memo from the Administrative Assistant Batchelder informing Council that the Clinic representatives have requested that the matter be tabled to April 7th. Councilmember Blesener moved that discussion on the application for sign variance for Centre Pointe Medical Clinic be tabled to April 7th. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. CASE NO. 92-01, Council acknowledged an application from the HUDSON COMPANY Hudson Company for a conditional use permit to ' allow the firm to operate a freight terminal in an Industrial District at the former Country Club Warehouse on Highway 13. Council also acknowledged staff reports and a letter from the Hudson Company in response to Planning Commission concerns. Mr. James Hudson, President of the Hudson Company, and the project architect, Mr. Kilstoff of Kilstoff and Associates, were present for the discussion. Mr. Kilstoff reviewed drawings of the facility, informing Council that the plan includes construction of a new 4,300 square storage garage. It is also planned to do some minor interior remodeling, , add a freezer and increase the existing cooler size. The applicant also plans to install a 10,000 square foot below ground fuel tank and � a diesel fuel pump which would only be used to fill company vehicles. All signage will be on ` the building. Mr. Kilstoff responded to Planning Commission concerns over screening, stating that the firm , will plant juniper shrubs at the top of the existing berm to screen the loading docks from � the highway. Page No. 3238 March 5, 1992 With respect to the underground tank, Public Works Director Danielson informed Council that state law controls underground tanks, and the regulations are enforced by the EPA. Mr. Hudson stated that an environmental survey has been done on the property and there are no contaminants on the site. Councilmember Cummins asked if the building is occupied. Mr. Hudson responded that Country Club has vacated the building, and it is not currently occupied. Mr. Hudson stated that he has concerns about the shrubbery on the berm, stating that he would hate to see it get so high that it blocks visibility along the highway, but that he will do whatever Council requests for landscaping. ' Mr. Kilstoff stated that the plantings he has suggested, consisting of two species recommended by city staff, would grow to five feet in diameter and three feet high. The berm is three feet high, and the loading docks will not be seen from the highway when the plantings have grown to three feet. Since a landscaping plan�has not been prepared or submitted at this time, there was discussion over how Council could proceed with approval. Mayor Mertensotto suggested that the approving resolution could be adopted conditioned upon submission of the landscaping plans within thirty days. The conditional use permit would not be issued until the plan is submitted and approved by City staff. Councilmember Koch asked what the storage building setback is in relation to the existing railroad tracks. Administrative Assistant Batchelder responded that the building is set back five feet from the property line, as is allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. If the 100 foot railroad right-of- way is purchased by Mn/DOT, he felt that the right-of-way would likely revert to the contiguous property owners. He did not anticipate that the right-of-way would ever be developed. Page No. 3239 March 5, 1992 Councilmember Blesener pointed out that the two berms are about 200 feet in length, and suggested that, if the proposed plantings are •- to be 5 feet on center, the landscape plan should specify 40 bushes. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that a building permit will be required, and suggested that Council could authorize the permit subject to staff review and approval of the building plan and the landscaping plan. Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No. 92-17, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR FREIGHT TERMINAL IN THE "I" DISTRICT FOR THE HUDSON COMPANY," and authorization for issuance of the building permit, subject to staff review and approval of the building plan, on the condition that no building permit will be issued by the city until the landscaping plan has been submitted and approved by city staff. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 92-03, Council acknowledged an application from MARVIN ANDERSON HOMES Marvin Anderson Homes for a preliminary plat (BRIDGEVIEW SHORES) to create five outlots in the Bridgeview Shores Third Addition. Council also acknowledged a petition from Bridgeview Shores residents and a letter from Mr. & Mrs. Scott , Bachman, 2464 Bridqeview Shores, regarding the Bridgeview Shores development. Mr. Marlin Grant, President of Marvin Anderson Construction Company and Mr. Gale Happe, legal representative for the firm were present for the discussion. Mr. Happe explained that the application was submitted because,of a problem which arose over a title defect in the approved plat. A property dispute with the adjoining property owner, Bernard Friel, arose because of an old fence which meanders from 0 to 10 degrees south of the quarter-quarter section. Marvin Anderson Company i:s asking to plat a narrow strip of land along the fence line into separate outlots. Once the dispute is settled, the outlots will either be added to the five lots from which they are proposed to be taken or will revert to Mr. Friel. Page No. 3240 March 5, 1992 Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the City Planner indicated in his report that since the request is for a total replat, the complete planning process has been required. The application has been before the Planning Commission. Mr. Jeff Melind, surveyor for the Marvin Anderson Company, stated that some minor changes have been made to the lot lines to maintain lot sizes, but those changes do not affect the size of the homes or the building pads. Responding to a question from Mayor Mertensotto, he stated that the replatting r should have no affect on the wetlands or cause any additional problems. Mayor Mertensotto asked if the proposed replatting would affect the location of in- place utilities. Public Director Danielson indicated that it would not. Mr. Bernard Fri�l stated that the discovery over the fence line was made as the result of some significant grading by some trees near the property line. The disputed area is between the quarter section line and the fence line which was established for at least sixty to seventy years. He informed Council that the proposed outlots C, D, E, and F, all abut his property. Mr. Friel stated that he has no objection to the outlot platting, and that the consequence is that in order to settle the dispute it will either be by settlement or litigation which would significantly slow down development of the property unless the outlots are approved. The requested platting would at least hold the property in abeyance until the dispute is settled. He pointed out that the� Planning Commission recommended that if the plat is approved, Council should allow no removal of trees in the disputed area. Mr. Scott Bachman, 2464 Bridgeview Court, stated that the submitted petition contains the signatures of nine of the ten original Bridgeview Shores First Addition homeowners. He stated that the residents ask for a sixty day delay in acting on the request to allow them to make a presentation to Council. He informed Council that the residents would like the opportunity to show that there is a problem with variances and construction. Page No. 3241 March 5, 1992 Mr. Norman Linnell, 2488 Bridgevi�w Court, stated that some of the concerns of the petitioners is over introductions Mr. Grant made at the Planning Commission meeting. He stated that it is his understanding that Mr. Grant is no longer involved in the management of Marvin Anderson. Also, the residents have had`no opportunity to meet with those who are in charge at the company. He pointed out that the firm is before Council for an accommodation - in order to do so, they must replat. He stated that Council must consider whether the firm has lived up to promises made both to Council and the buyers of lots in the First Addition. Marvin Anderson made certain commitments to Council in order to get approval of the original plat and wetlands permits in 1988. Since that time the company made many promises to potential residents of the First Addition to encourage purchase of lots. He stated that those residents don't feel Marvin Anderson has lived up to its promises to them or the city. In April, 1988 Council considered 24 wetlands permits for Marvin Anderson, and Fred Haas, its representative, promised that all basements would be 8 feet above the waterline. He stated that this is not true in Phase 2- from a visual inspection it also does not appear to be eight feet above the high water mark. He , asked what will happen in the third addition and what assurance Council has that the firm will keep the promise over basement levels and setbacks. Mr. Haas also stated that as many trees would be preserved as possible, and plant additional trees on the north side, which has not been done. He further stated that Council was informed that the custom homes would sell in the $250,000 to $400,000 ; price range. He was concerned is that the promises have not been kept and that Council has no assurance they will be followed in the Third Addition. He informed Council that � those who purchased homes in the First Addition are concerned that they were promised to them that all of the homes would be custom homes priced at $200,000 or more and that the ' third phase would not be developed for at least three years. The residents were given commitment that there would be architectural controls for value and type of homes - all of the homes would be walk-outs. Mr. Linnell stated that the residents feel that Council should look at the commitments that were made � Page No. 3242 March 5, 1992 to Council and do everything in its power to see that the company Tives up to its promises. Mayor Mertensotto asked Mr. Grant to address the setbacks and elevations and the tree removal issues. He informed Mr. Linnell that he did not believe that Council can get involved in the home value issue, which is a representation from the developer to the buyers. He expressed concern about architectural controls but felt that it is a private matter. Mr. Grant responded that Marvin Anderson has been in business in the Twin Cities for 40 years and wants to continue in the business. As far as removal of trees, he informed Council that when an area is developed that has a significant difference in topography from one area to another, and streets must be graded to a certain pitch, the developer must do some grading of the land. He stated that his firm is committed to retaining as many trees as possible, as trees are valuable, and none are removed without good reason. He also pointed out that removing trees is costly. With respect to wetlands, he assured Council that he is sure Mr. Haas abided by the approved setbacks and by the elevation over the highwater mark. He explained that Mr. Haas is very concerned about the issue and spends much time on the site. The surveyor stated that the developer is required to submit a survey with every building permit application, showing all grades. The survey is reviewed by the city inspection department before any permit is issued. He stated that on occasion the locations of houses have been adjusted because of the proximity to the wetlands - they have been changed to maintain the setbacks. Mayor Mertensotto stated that city staff can certainly determine the elevations of the homes. He further stated that Council recognizes that some trees must be removed in the grading of a plat but that a developer is responsible to keep as many trees as possible. Mr. Grant responded that as much as possible is done to save trees, but if a 20 foot cut is required, it is very hard to adjust the grade to save trees. Page No. 3243 March 5, 1992 Mayor Mertensotto expressed concern over the stability of lots which receive fill to keep the elevations above the high water mark. Mr. Grant responded that if fill is used, it would have to be done under the observation of a soils engineer. The surveyor informed Council that there should never be any problems with fill, since it is compacted and observed by a soils engineer. Public Works Director Danielson stated that city staff is given a soils report from the developer's soils engineer before a building permit is issued for a lot. Councilmember Smith pointed out that the grading plan submitted to Council was dated February 3, 1991, which was prior to the grading of the site. She stated that she knows that many of the trees are gone, and the plan is not an accurate portrayal of what exists today. The surveyor responded that the date was a typographical error - the plan was done right before its submission of the preliminary plat, and it shows the trees which remain on the site. Councilmember Smith stated that when she walked the site she noticed there is a very steep cut along the tree line and a number of the trees had their roots exposed. She asked whether this has been rectified, and pointed out that she could not believe the trees would survive. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the grading operations were discontinued when the boundary dispute arose and there are some trees at the edge of the bank. Engineer Klayton Eckles informed Council that as part of the recently revised zoning ordinance, a grading plan must be submitted for every new lot before a building permit can be issued. He stated that he reviews each grading plan to make sure that drainage conditions and elevations are correct. He pointed out that the elevation the engineering department uses is 3 foot above the high water mark, although it may be true that the Council minutes reflect an 8 foot elevation for the first addition. Page No. 3244 March 5, 1992 Councilmember Smith asked if the grade of neighboring property is taken into account when grading plans are approved. She stated that there is at least a 15 foot drop in grade on the site. The engineering department reviews the plans to make sure that drainage will work and that the proposed grading will not adversely affect the neighboring properties. He stated that staff cannot tell a developer that he cannot have a berm or steep slope - those details are determined in the planning process - but engineering looks for at least a 3:1 slope as a normal maximum. He pointed out that the � subject grading operation was stopped before completion. Mayor Mertensotto suggested that perhaps in the replatting of the addition Council should require basement elevations higher than three feet above high water. Engineer Eckles responded that if the basement elevations are three feet above the high water they should be fine. There are no structures in the Bridgeview Shores 2nd Addition that have any potential flooding problems at all. The ponds have overflow elevations, and there is no way a house could possibly be flooded. The third addition sits up higher than the second, and the elevations should not be an issue. Mr. Grant stated that it appears that there will be an early spring and his firm would like to get going on the balance of the grading as soon as possible. He further stated that the trees with exposed roots are dormant now and he would like to get the roots covered up soon. Mr. Friel responded that there was no need to make a cut 20 feet deep along his property line and expose the tree roots. He stated that the contractor cut about 75 feet along the property line to a depth of 18 feet. Mr. Friel pointed out that when he complained about the cutting, Public Works Director Danielson told him that it did not comply with the grading plan, and the developer indicated that he was going to have a contractor remove the trees. Mr. Danielson then stopped the grading. As a result, Mr. Haas looked at the Page No. 3245 March 5, 1992 grading and responded that the dirt was being taken for fill and would be replaced. In the process several mature trees were destroyed to accommodate on-site filling. He further stated that the developer promised that the area would be refilled last fall and the area would be fertilized. Although he suggested that the trees be trimmed to help save them, nothing was done. Mr. Friel stated that all the grading plan means is where the finish grade will be. Mr. Greg Vidas, a resident of Bridgeview Shores lst Addition, asked who is held • accountable for the misrepresentations of the Marvin Anderson Company on what has been done. Many of those in his addition bought their homes in good faith and believed in the representations which had been made but were not kept. He felt that the second addition homes are essentially tract homes, and that none of them is custom. He pointed out that signs for the area are now advertising homes for $125,000 and up - the first addition homes are valued at $200,000 plus, and are totally surrounded by homes that are valued in the $100,000's. He felt that this is destroying the value of the first addition homes and is a total misrepresentation. Councilmember Cummins stated that he is both angry and disappointed that the quality of the homes in the development has deteriorated. Those promised and built in the first phase were high quality custom construction, and what Council expected but now sees in the Bridgeview Development is much lower quality and pricing. Mr. Grant responded that the market has changed dramatically since the first addition was platted - the higher priced homes are very difficult to sell. He stated that what has happened is that there is now a wider range of prices - there is a home in the second addition with a$300,000 price, and others have lesser costs. He observed that he would prefer to build the higher priced homes but must build what the buyers want. Councilmember Cummins stated that very specific representations had been made by the developer to Council about valuations and that he felt the developer was prepared to ride out Page No. 3246 March 5, 1992 the market. He stated that insofar as the request being made by the developer he feels no obligation to deal with it in an accommodating way. He further stated that it is his intent to table the matter for two months to allow all of the issues to be thoroughly investigated and to determine what steps the city can legally take to be sure that representations made by the developer to the city are met. He expressed his desire to see more of the $200,000 to $300,000 homes that were promised and fewer of the $130,000 homes that have been built. Councilmember Cummins moved to table the � matter to May 5th to allow city staff time to prepare reports regarding wetlands setbacks and building elevations and to allow residents the opportunity to submit their concerns to staff. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: o IVY FALLS CREEK Council acknowledged a report from Engineer - Eckles regarding the Ivy Falls Creek improvement neighborhood meeting. Council also acknowledged a letter from Mr. Jack Brassard, 1205 Sylvandale Road, expressing his support for the proposed project. Engineer Eckles informed Council that only those property owners whose property is classified as the high benefit area were invited to attend the meeting. Responding to a question from Mayor Mertensotto, he confirmed that the property owners recognized the need for the project, and that their biggest concern was over funding of the project. He stated that the City Administrator has suggested that the matter be addressed in a workshop setting at which staff would present various options to Council. Mr. Ellis Abrahamson, 714.Maple Park Court, stated that not all of the properties are affected by the erosion, including his property. He objected to the use of gabions and felt that storm sewer installation would be a better solution. He further commented that the entire area is involved and everyone should pay the cost for improvements, including the City of West St. Paul. Page No. 3247 March 5, 1992 Mayor Mertensotto responded that the City is a member of a watershed management organization which has as a purpose the equalization of community costs for c,ontrolling water . drainage. � Public Works Director Danielson stated that it would be extremely difficult and costly to divert the water into storm sewer pipes instead of into the creek. Mr. Tom Vining, 706 Maple Park Court, asked why the city is asking him to pay anything for the project if the WMO has diverted water into the creek. He stated that he is appalled that. the water has been diverted past his property through a regional plan. Engineer Eckles stated that Mr. Vining is correct that all of the water is going through his property and that the proposal staff is currently looking into is that the city find some way to finance 80% of the project cost. He informed the audience that public hearings will be held on the project in the future. It was the consensus of Council to conduct a workshop at 6:30 P.M. on March 17th to discuss park land goals and financing of public improvements. SNOW PLOWING POLICY Council acknowledged a revised draft of the , proposed snow plowing policy. � Councilmember Smith stated that she would like the City Attorney to review the document and that there are still�some questions to be answered about yard damage claims. Councilmember Cummins stated that he supports , submitted draft which included a highlighted paragraph explicitly stating that plantings in � � the right-of-way are the responsibility of the property owners. , Councilmember Smith pointed out that the language conflicts with other statements in � the policy. Councilmember Blesener and Koch agreed that the city does not want to be responsible for things in the boulevard. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 SUPERBLOCK PLANNING Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Page No. 3248 March 5, 1992 Councilmember Cummins moved to approve the snow plowing policy dated March 5, 1992. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Councilmember Blesener was excused from the meeting at 8:38 P.M. Administrator Lawell informed Council that if the intent is to implement the policy for the 1992/93 winter season it will be necessary for Council to authorize preparation of specifications for a fourth snow plow. Councilmember Cummins moved to authorize ` preparation of specifications for a snow plow. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Council acknowledged a report from the City Administrator regarding superblock planning and a related proposal from the City Planner. Mayor Mertensotto suggested that the proposed contract should be amended to provide that after completion of a phase of the contract, the consultant must request written authorization from the city to proceed with the next phase. � Councilmember Smith moved to accept the proposed contract, with a total contract cap of $6,000, amended to require DSU to request written authorization from the city before proceeding from one contract phase to another. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. GOAL SETTING It was the consensus of Council that the � annual Council goal setting session be conducted on Saturday, March 28th. MISCELLANEOUS Administrative Assistant Batchelder informed Council of a new state mandate, which the city must enforce, requiring that all households and commercial properties must be served by a garbage contractor. A revision to the city ordinance will be presented to Council in the near future. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmember moved that the .• , � Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor Page No. 3249 March 5, 1992 meeting be adjourned to 6:30 P.M. on March 17th for Council workshop. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:51 o'CloCk P.M. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk in CITY OF N�NDOTA BEIGHTS DAROTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COb�iISSION MINQTES FLBRIIARY 25, 1992 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, February 25, 1992, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 o'clock P.M. The following Commission members were present: Koll, Friel, Dreelan, Dwyer and Duggan. Commissioner Tilsen was excused. Commissioner Krebsbach had notified the Commission that she would be late. Also present were Public Works Director Jim Danielson, City Planner John Uban, Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser. APPROVAL OF MINIITES Commissioaer 1991, Miautes Commissioner AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 ABSTAIN: 1, Duggaa ELFCTION OF OFFICLRS Friel moved approval of the November 26, with corrections. Roll secoaded the motion. Commissioaer Duggaa aomiaated Mike Dwyer for the positioa -� of Chair aad Commissioner Saadra Krebsbach for the positioa of Vice Chair. Commissioner Friel secoaded the motion. AYSS: 5 NAYS: 0 HEARING CASE NO. 92-05: CF3NTRE POINT}3 MEDICAL CLINIC - SIGN SIZS VARIANCE Ms. Deborah Jeffrey, of Towle Real Estate, was present to discuss a sign variance request for the Centre Pointe Medical Clinic. Ms. Jeffrey explained the proposed sign is to be twenty-five feet (25' ) tall from the base to the top. She explained the total surface area of the sign will be 100 square f eet per side . Ms . Jef f rey stated the sign surface would be located fifteen feet (15') above ground level. She further explained the appearance of the sign will be consistent with the sign standards established by the Yorkton Business Park. February 25, 1992 Page 2 Ms. Jeffrey stated the Centre Pointe Medical Clinic has requested two sign variances in the past. She explained the most recent request was for a temporary banner sign that was attached to the top �of the building. She further stated a sma.11 sign was installed to indicate the location of the entry drive. Ms. Jeffrey explained there are two family physicians practices currently occupying the building. She stated one is a Primary Care Clinic and the other HealthEast Immediate Care. She explained the HealthEast Primary Care Clinic has sent 142, 000 flyers in the past year, '. placed many advertisements and held an open house in hopes of recruiting patients. Ms. Jeffrey submitted sample flyers to the Planning Commission. Ms. Jeffrey explained the lack of traffic in the area. She stated that due to the placement of the building, it is not widely visible from Highway 110. She stated patients have great difficulty in finding the building and that a sign would be needed. She further explained the Clinic needs to increase the number of patients seen by the physicians, and if there is no increase, the Clinic may have to relocate. Commissioner Rrebsbach arrived at 7:47 o'clock P.M. Ms. Jeffrey explained the owner of the building has been unable to lease space and that currently only 43 percent of the building is occupied. Ms. Jeffrey stated that a monument type sign will attract new patients and it will also serve as a"eye catching" sign for current patients . Chair Dwyer questioned if there is no increase in the number of patients in a year, would the sign then come down. Ms. Jeffrey responded that at this point in time, a sign would be helpful in increasing the volume of new patients. She stated that in a year they would reevaluate their situation. Ms. Jeffrey stated that they have had success with mailing of flyers. Commi s s i oner and that he Commissioner using a sign hard pressed the variance. a variance. Friel stated he is a patient at this clinic had no trouble in finding the clinic. Friel stated that he has a concern with for a marketing tool and that he would be in being persuaded to recommend approval of He stated there is no hardship to warrant Ms. Jeffrey responded the sign is not only going to be used for marketing purposes, it will also be used for February 25, 1992 Page 3 identification. She explained the property is separated by grade and distance from Highway 110. She stated the visibility of the building is obstructed, especially for people coming from the west on Highway 110. She further stated the request for the sign variance is not a last resort request. Chair Dwyer questioned if existing patients have problems with locating the building. Ms. Sue Zwirner, Centre Pointe Medical, explained both existing and new patients have difficulty in locating the clinic. Commissioner Friel suggested that the City consider reviewing the Zoning Ordinance relating to signs in the B-1, Limited District. He stated that if this district needs more signage, it may be worthwhile to review the Ordinance instead of granting variances to the Ordinance. He stated he has concern with proliferation of signs in this area. Commissioner Krebsbach pointed out the Mendota Bridge will be closed for two years and installing a sign might not make a difference. She stated with the construction of the new highway, it will provide better access and visibility to the building. Commissioner Duggan stated he his concerned with the setting of a precedent in recommending approval of sign variances in this area. He stated that he is not in favor of a large sign. Commissioner Duggan questioned if a sign could be placed on the Highway giving direction to the Clinic. Administrative Assistant Batchelder explained the City Council had considered including directional signage within the new Zoning Ordinance, but had decided to continue prohibiting off site directional signage in the City as it tenda to create urban clutter. Commissioner Duggan questioned if the clinic would be willing to remove the sign once they were able to reach their projected volume of patients. Ms. Jeffrey stated that they would consider removing the sign. Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public. Mr. Jim Losleben, Hazel Court, stated he is in favor of helping the Clinic. He stated the clinic is difficult to find. He stated the City should work with the Highway Department to install signage. He further commented the clinic is an asset to the community. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 February 25, 1992 Page 4 Commissioaer Krebsbach moved to close the public hearing. Commissioaer Dreelan secoaded the motion. Commissioaer Friel moved to recommend that City Couacil deay the request for a siga variaace and to suggest that staff review, with the Highway Department, a method of providiag directioaal signage ia the right-of-way and for staff to review the B-1 Zoaiag District regarding signage to fiad out if it is too restrictive. Commissioner Koll seconded the motion. Commissioner Duggan questioned if there would be a large cost in staff time to the City if discussions were to take place with the Highway Department. Public Works Director Danielson explained the City has negotiated with the Highway Department regarding signage in right-of-ways and they are not receptive to the idea. Commissioner Duggan explained he would like to see the clinic install a smaller sign. Chair Dwyer suggested the clinic send post cards with maps confirming appointments. Ms. Jeffrey stated Nordquist Signs has done research on the size of sign and has stated the height is ideal in accomplishing their visibility problem. Commissioner Friel stated they have not presented a hardship case which is a requirement through the Zoning Ordinance in obtaining a variance. AYES: 5 NAYS: 1, Duggaa BEARING CAS£ NO. 92-01: HODSON COMPANY, INC. CIIP Mr. Kilstoft, Architect representing Hudson Company, was present to discuss Mr. Jim Hudson's request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a truck terminal located at 1460 Sibley Memorial Highway. Mr. Kilstoft explained that Mr. Hudson is proposing to modify the existing Country Club Warehouse for use as a truck freight terminal. He explained Mr. Hudson will use February 25, 1992 Page 5 the facility as a cold storage warehouse and a distribution facility. He explained there will be an on- site fueling, maintenance and washing of the company trucks. Mr. Kilstoft explained there will be an increase in the paved surface area on the north end of the property to accommodate additional employee parking and vehicle storage. Chair Dwyer questioned if provisions have been made for indoor storing and handling trash indoors as required in the Zoning Ordinance. He further inquired as to the steps that will be taken in disposal of used oil and �=- batteries. Mr. Hudson responded he will comply with the regulations as set forth in the Ordinance and he would contact the State Health Department to find out their regulations. Chair Dwyer questioned if tliere will be screening constructed to block the trailers and loading area. Mr. Hudson responded the Company has 12 tractors and 18 trailers. He explained the warehouse will be open 24 hours a day and that the vehicles will be coming and going during the late night hours. Mr. Kilstoft explained they have proposed three foot (3') berms and are considering planting trees to add to the height of the berms in order to•screen the loading areas. In response Mr. Hudson tank on the 13, 55 and traveling. to a question from Commissioner Krebsbach, stated there would be one underground fuel site. Mr. Hudson further explained Highways 494 would be used as the ma.in source of Commissioner Friel stated the traffic problems are of a real concern and he suggests that more information regarding the traffic on Highway 13 should be received from the highway department. He further stated he would like to see more information regarding underground storage of fuel tanks should be requested from the State for Council's review. Mr. Rilstoft explained the tanks are constructed out of fiberglass and will installed according to all State requirements. Mr. Kilstoft further stated the fuel tanks will be placed underground and away from the building. Commissioner Duggan questioned if Mr. Hudson is willing to plant evergreen trees along the front of the entrance to the building. Mr. Kilstoft stated that site lines are AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 February 25, 1992 Page 6 a real problem. He explained evergreen trees would be a good screening tool but that they get tall and the visibility of the truck drivers is a concern. He stated they would be willing to look into the planting of evergreen trees further onto the site, towards the middle of the building. Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public. There was no one present to discuss this matter. In response to a question from Commissioner Krebsbach, �• � Mr. Hudson stated the building was owned by Country Club Warehouse. He stated they ran the same operation as he is proposing. He explained the traffic generated by Country Club was in and out all day. He stated his operation would generate roughly the same amount of traffic 24 hours a day. Commissioner Dreelan inquired about the new addition and its five foot setback from the railroad right-of-way. Public Works Director Danielson stated that the Zoning Ordinance allows setbacks of this dimension along railroad right-of-way's. Danielson explained the railroad is not used and may be abandoned. He stated the right-of-way is one hundred feet (100') wide and that United Property owns a large industrial property on the other side. In response to a question from Commission Roll, Mr. Kilstoft stated there should be no problem with drainage as the surface area is essentially flat. He further stated there will be minimal amount of restoration need due to the construction of the proposed building. Comnnissioner Duggaa moved to close the public heariag. Commissioner Koll secoaded the motion. Commissioner Duggaa moved to recommead that the City Council grant the Conditioaal IIse Permit to operate a freight terminal with the followiag conditions: 1. Provisions for indoor storage or screening of trash receptacles. 2. Demonstration of proper disposal of any hazardous waste. 3. Additional evergreea screening or landscaping Truck Highway 13. February 25, 1992 Page 7 Commissioner Koll seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 1, Rrebsbach HEARING CA.SE NO . 92 - 03 : MARVIN H ANDFsRSON CONSTRIICTION COMPANY SIIBDIVISION Commissioner Friel informed the Commission that he would excuse himself from discussing this issue due to personal and financial reasons. Mr. Marlin Grant, Ma.rv Anderson Construction, introduced Mr. Jeff Lindgren, Engineer and Mr. Dale Happe, Attorney, to the Planning Commission. Mr. Dale Happe, Attorney, briefly explained Ma.rv Anderson Construction's request for a subdivision. He explained the property was platted as Outlot C of the Bridgeview Shores First Addition in order to avoid having to file the final plat on this portion of the property until it was ready to be developed. Mr. Happe stated the preliminary plat for the entire project was approved approximately three years ago. He stated the drawing at that time showed a lot layout similar to the one identified on the drawings submitted with Marv Anderson's application. Mr. Happe explained that when the developer attempted to process the final plat for the original lot configuration for this portion of the property, an adjacent property owner, Mr. Bernie Friel, filed a claim of adverse possession for a narrow strip along the north side of the parcel. Mr. Happe stated in order for the developer to move forward with the process of platting the remainder of the property, they are proposing to replat the property to create several outlots that would encompass the areas in dispute. In response to a question from the Commission, Mr. Happe stated the revised preliminary plat dated February 25, 1992, shows the property lines goes right to the fence line as indicated on the plat. He stated the plat is the same as before but now the outlots have been created. Mr. Happe explained the intent of proposing the outlots is to then deed the outlots to the property of whichever side prevails in the legal dispute. Commissioner Duggan stated there has been no indication, according to the plans submitted, of a tree survey being February 25, 1992 Page 8 completed. He questioned if the site grading has been completed. Mr. Happe stated the site grading has been completed. Mr. Happe stated a tree survey was submitted with the original plat . He explained that when Mr. Friel placed his objection regarding the property dispute, all tree removal was ceased. He explained that Marvin Anderson Construction has readily agreed to enter into a covenance agreement about the removal of trees. Chair Dwyer stated Marv Anderson Construction will need to advise the City Council of the status of the trees removed and the status of the health of all trees still existing. Mr. Jeff Lindgren stated the grading has been completed and they are not planning to remove anymore trees. He stated a tree survey was completed and it is their intention to leave the remaining trees standing. He stated it is their intent to save as many trees as possible. Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public. Mr. Jim Losleben, 815 Hazel Court, stated all fence line trees have been removed. He stated he lives adjacent to the proposed development and that all trees have been destroyed. He stated the Oak trees' roots have been cut twenty feet down. �He•further commented why should the City accommodate a developer who has ma.de a mistake. Mr. Bernie Friel, 750 Mohican Lane, stated he is not objecting to the platting of the outlots. He explained the south line of the outlots is the fence line that has existed at least,35 years. He stated the north line is surveyed boundary line of 1/4 section. He stated the boundary line trees are valuable Oak trees. He stated he would like to see the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed plat with the outlots and that the recommendation be conditioned on no more removal of trees. Mr. Bachman, 2464 Bridgeview Court, regarding Marv Anderson's disrespect fc destructed in this development. He fu� upset with the lower valued homes constructed. He suggested the City � Anderson Homes has done to the City's construction of lower valued homes. Planning Commission table the hearing. stated his anger �r trees that were ther stated he is the Company has ook at what Marv tax base with the He suggested the Commissioner Rrebsbach moved to close the public heariag. Commissioaer Duggaa seconded the motioa. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 February 25, 1992 Page 9 (Commissioner Friel had excused himself from this hearing). Commissioner Krebsbach stated she specifically had asked, during the time of the original preliminary plat hearing, who would be supervising the removal of trees. She stated that Mr. Haas had responded there would be supervision on site during the removal of the trees . She stated the trust of the City has been betrayed by the developers as the trees were destroyed: Commissioner �- Krebsbach further stated she would like to remove Lot 9 from the plat to create larger lots. She further stated the lots are too close to the wetlands. Commissioner Duggan stated he would like to see, the recommendation of the Planning Commission put on hold until further information can be obtained regarding Lot 9 and until a current survey of trees can be obtained. He further stated more information should be obtained regarding the erosion of the tax base with building homes with valuations of $130,000. Chair Dwyer stated the preliminary plat has been reviewed and approved by the City Council. He stated it is inappropriate for the Commission to consider the changing of the plat other than considering the newly created outlots. He stated he shares the Commission's concern about the poor treatment of the land by Marv Anderson Homes. Mr. Friel stated the outlot proposal submitted is a means of solving the problem, but that the approval of the outlots is not essential, in his perspective, of the dispute settling. In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Public Works Director Danielson stated the preliminary plat had been approved by Council. Commissioner Duggan stated that he would like the City Attorney to review Marv Anderson's current request. Mr. Marlin Grant stated the current pricing of the homes selling in the area are reflective of the economy. He explained the builder needs to build according to the market. He explained they are still building homes in the price range of $200,000 to $250,000. He stated they are now offering a wider variety of homes. He explained that a certain amount of the land needs to be removed to create streets, utilities, driveways, etc. February 25, 1992 Page 10 Mr. Allen, resident of Bridgeview Shores, stated the Planning Commission has an obligation to the community to protect the tax base and the environment. Commissioaer Duggan moved to table the request for prelimiaary plat uatil further review, of the Plat, by the City's Attoraey. Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion. AYES: 2 NAYS: 3, Dwyer, Roll, Dreelan MOTION FAILS. Chair Dwyer moved to recommend that the City Couacil approve the prelimiaary plat request with the coadition that ao more trees be removed. Commissioaer Roll secoaded the motion. AYES: 3 NAYS: 2, Rrebsbach, Duggaa Chair Dwyer called a recess at 9:20 o'clock P.M. Chair Dwyer reconvened the meeting at 9:40 o'clock P.M. HEARING: CASS NO. 92-02: THL ROTTLIIND COMPANY INC REZONING, CIIP FOR PIID SIIBDIVISION Mr. Todd Stutz, Executive Vice President of Rottlund Homes, was present to discuss their request for a proposed planned unit development located in the southeast quadrant of Mendota Heights Road and Dodd Road. Mr. Stutz explained the total acreage of the site is 10 .25 acres . He stated their request is to consider a 68 unit townhome development on 9.5 acres of the parcel. He stated the rema.ining .9 acres will become an outlot whose use will be determined at a later date. He stated the Rottlund Company is aware this property has been a subject of controversy in the past. He stated this property is guided as High Density Residenti�al and their proposed density is 7.09 units per acre. Mr. Stutz stat`ed their proposal includes of eight different buildings, with seven buildings consisting of eight units each and one building consisting of twelve units. He explained the proposal is a new product for the Twin Cities. He described the proposed townhomes as February 25, 1992 Page 11 Courtyard Townhomes . He stated the homes will be back to back homes with the center units having single garages and the end units having double garages. Mr. Stutz stated the proposed square feet of the end townhomes to be 1, 422 square feet and the center townhomes to be 1, 390 square feet. Mr. Stutz stated the exterior material will consist of aluminum siding and brick. He further explained the townhomes will be two story homes. Mr. Stutz stated the target market will be for empty ' nesters. He stated there is a significant population in Mendota Heights and West St . Paul that would be attracted to this style home. He stated they have received many inquiries from interested people. Mr. Stutz stated the setbacks along Mendota Heights Road, the parking setback and the setback along the east property line all meet or exceed the requirements as per the Zoning Ordinance. He explained there will be two separate entrance pods to the development and that they will be split in elevation. He explained that cars cannot travel from one end to the other. He explained the buffering transition between the development and the adjacent single family homes and also along I-494. He stated they are proposing four foot to ten foot berms along Mendota Heights Road along with boulder walls and landscape buffering. Mr. Stutz also stated they are proposing an irrigation system. He further explained there currently is vegetation along I- 494 which will benefit the site and that it should help provide adequate noise attenuation protection. He explained the City will provide the storm water run off and that the proposed holding pond will flow under Mendota Heights Road. Mr. Stutz also stated there will be a homeowner's association. Mr. Stutz stated they estimate the traffic capacity to be 476 trips per day and the streets in the area are adequate to handle this capacity. Chair Dwyer questioned how Rottlund Homes can build this development "without losing their shirts". He stated that Rottlund is proposing to sell these units $80,000 each. He stated that their costs are greater than their prices. He stated the City needs to be reassured that the developer will not walk away f rom the proj ect . Chair Dwyer stated, as a requirement of the Zoning Ordinance, February 25, 1992 Page 12 a statement of financing should be submitted to the City Council. He stated the statement submitted to the Planning Commission is inadequate. Mr. Stutz responded that Rottlund feels very comfortable that this development will be a success. He stated that Rottlund Homes is the largest builder in the area and that their developments speak for themselves. Chair Dwyer stated Rottlund Homes will need to submit a statement or assurance of financial capability as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Stutz stated they will provide a statement of finances but not the corporate financial statements which is protected information. Commissioner Duggan questioned the scale of the plan submitted. Mr. Stutz stated the plan the Commission received was reduced and the scale reads 1/4 inch equals one foot. Commissioner Duggan stated he is not happy with the plans submitted for their review. Public Works Director Danielson confirmed that City staff received a full size set of the proposed development. Commissioner Krebsbach stated her concern with the overcrowding of the development. She stated she would like to see an accurate drawing of the development. She further questioned what the propoaed development is for the outlot. Mr. Stutz responded that Rottlund Homes is not purchasing the outlot and that the remaining title will be with Mr. Richard Putnam. Mr. Stutz further stated that the density of the proposed development meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Commissioner Friel questioned what "for sale" development means. Mr. Stutz responded the homes are for sale and not rented. Commissioner Friel questioned if the homeowners association will be that of a full development association or per lot association. Mr. Stutz responded that the association will be that of a full development. Commissioner Friel questioned if the outlot is a part of the planned unit development. Mr. Stutz stated that the outlot is being created as a result of the planned unit development. Commissioner Friel questioned if a soil survey has been submitted to the Planner for review. Planner Uban stated that no survey has been submitted. Mr. Stutz stated Braun Engineering has reviewed the site and there seems to be no problems with the site. In response to a question from Commissioner Friel, Mr. February 25, 1992 Page 13 Stutz stated there will be no public streets within the development. Mr.. Stutz further explained the homes will be constructed slab on grade, no basements. He stated the empty nesters market is not looking for basement level type housing. Commissioner Friel stated, relating to traffic, that the highway department has raised issues in the past with traffic capacity at Highway 149 and Mendota Heights Road. He further commented the highway department might want to expand access to I-494 in view of the traffic problems that are apparent after the ramps were constructed for I- � 494. Public Works Director Danielson stated the City of Eagan is currently exploring their options regarding the traffic capacity problem related to their City. Commissioner Koll questioned if ineasures will be taken for soundproofing related to both aircraft and traffic noise. Mr. Stutz briefly described sound attenuation measures relating specifically to windows, walls construction and central air. Public Works Director Danielson stated the City enforces a Noise Attenuation Ordinance. Commissioner Duggan questioned if the effectiveness of the sound proofing of homes has ever been measured within Kensington. He questioned if the City could measure the noise levels. He further stated that there is an increase in traffic and aircraft noise in the area which makes the area very uncomfortable for residents. Commissioner Koll questioned if there will be berming along the access ramps of the development. She further questioned the depth of the holding pond. Mr. Stutz stated the holding pond will be constructed to accommodate the site drainage. He stated the pond will hold storm water and release it to the sewers. Mr. Stutz stated the pond is dry, it will be sodded, and will not have standing water except during storm events. Commissioner Koll questioned what the spacing will be between the buildings. Mr. Stutz responded the total dimensions to be 64 feet, garage to garage. Mr. Stutz further stated the streets will be private with surmountable curbs and that no parking will occur on the streets. Mr. Stutz stated the association will have a "reserve account" used for the maintenance of the driveways and buildings. Mr. Stutz stated the approximate longevity of aluminum to be 30 to 35 years and that he is unsure of the longevity of brick. February 25, 1992 Page 14 Commissioner Koll stated that this development proposal is serving a real need in the community. Chair Dwyer quoted sections from the Zoning Ordinance, Sections 22.5 (4)b, Financing and 22.5 (4) c, Ownership. He stated that this specific information is needed. He questioned what the intent is for the outlot. Mr. Stutz responded the development of the outlot will be presented to the Commission at a later date. Commissioner Friel stated if the outlot is included in �=� the planned unit development then the developer must state their intentions of development for the outlot. Chair Dwyer stated that within the letter submitted by Rottlund Homes, it indicates square footage of the outlot to be 40, 954 as commercial square footage. He stated that he did not believe that the Commission could not make a recommendation to the Council if this commercial square footage is not defined as a specific use. Chair Dwyer stated he would like to see a copy of the Purchase Agreement. He further questioned if there will be street lights. He questioned if the public safety personnel have reviewed the plans. He further questioned the ratio of open space and lot coverage. Commissioner Krebsbach stated she would like to see more sensitivity to the surrounding land owners with respect to buffering. She further stated she would like to also see the ratio between grass and asphalt. Mr. Stutz responded the open space requirement has been met. Commissioner Friel stated the Planning report indicates that no tree survey has been submitted. He stated the outlot has trees. He further questioned if the fire department has reviewed the development. He stated his concern with the width of the cul-de-sac. In response to a question from Commissioner Krebsbach, Public Works Director Danielson explained the developer has a choice to propose either a land or cash donation to satisfy the park dedication requirement subject to Council approval and that all dedications are reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission. Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public. A resident from Bridgeview Shores stated that Rottlund Homes is a sophisticated builder. He stated he sees a lot of flaws in the plan. He stated his concerns with February 25, 1992 Page 15 the intention of the outlot, traffic capacity and the existing trees and vegetation that may be affected. He further stated his concerns for access of public safety personnel through the private streets. A resident from Mendota Woods stated he owns Lot 2 in Mendota Woods and that there are many trees that exist on the proposed site. He stated that trees exist further on the site than described on the plan. He stated his concern for the Oak trees. He stated his concerns for the transition of the proposed development to the Mendota Woods development, the value and quality of homes, �- greenspace requirements, safety, and the drainage of the holding pond along with the depth of water when the holding pond is full. He questioned if the City can require public streets. Public Works Director Danielson stated yes. Mr. Jim Losleben, 815 Hazel Court, stated his concerns with traffic problems this development ma.y generate. Commissioner Duggaa moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motioa. Commissioner Friel stated more public comment is still needed and suggested the public hearing not be closed. Commissioner Duggaa withdrew his motioa. Commissioner Friel stated the City should reconsider the park provisions in the Comprehensive Guide Plan before all of the developable space in the southeast area developed. Commissioner Dreelan was excused from the meeting at 10:58 o'CloCk P.M. Mr. Stutz stated he would like a specific list of information needed to come back to the Commission and that he would like the City's Attorney to be present at the next Planning Commission meeting. Commissioaer Friel moved to recommend that the Planning Coa�ission table the public heariag uatil the March 24, 1992 Plaaaing Commission meetiag and to direct staff to undertake a review of the southeast area plan, park issues and to direct Rottlund Homes to submit the following information for review at the Ma.rch meeting: AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 February 25, 1992 Page 16 1. Statemeat of Financing 2. Submit full scale plans 3. Iateat with the Outlot 4. Soil Survey 5. Total depth of the holdiag pond. 6. More detailed informatioa as directed through the Zoning Ordiaance, Sections 22.53(b), 22.54(g), 22 .54 (c) . 7. Street Lighting 8. Tree Survey 9. Ratio between grass:asphalt 10. Buffering Transition adjaceat to Mendota Woods � Coamtissioaer Friel also recommended that the public safety persoaael review the proposed plans and submit a report. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. Commissioaer Friel moved to recoamtend that this Planniag Commissioa recouunend to the Couacil that a review of southeast area's Compreheasive Plan be undertaken in view of the rather significaat loss of park area that was included ia the origiaal 1985 Compreheasive Plan, approved ia 1987, and because of development in the southeast area which has been different from the adopted Compreheasive Plan. Commissioner Duggan secoaded the motioa. Commissioner Koll was excused from the meeting at 11:15 o'cloCk P.M. PROCESSING OF HOIISEREFsPING VARIANCES Commissioner Friel moved to table the discussion on processing of housekeeping variaaces until the March 24, 1992 Plaaning Commission meeting. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NAYS: 1 February 25, 1992 Page 17 MISCELLANEOIIS A brief discussion ensued regarding the possibility of cable casting of Planning Commission meetings. Commissioner Friel moved to recommend that the City Couacil direct staff to research the possibility of cable casting future Planniag Commission meetings. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. AYES: 3 NAYS: 1, Rrebsbach VERBAL REVIEW ADJOIIRN Public Works Director Danielson provided a verbal review for the planning items at the previous City Council meeting. There being no further business, the Planning Commission adjourned its meeting at 11:25 o'clock P.M. Respectfully submitted, Kimberlee K. Blaeser Senior Secretary CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COIINTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION MIN[JTFsS � MAi2CH 2 4, 19 9 2 The r�gular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, Ma.rch 24,;: 1992, in the City Hall Council• Cliambers, 1101 Victoria Curve. �� TYfe meeting was called to order at 7:35 o' clock P.M. The following Commission members were pre; en�.i • Koll, Friel, Dreelan, Dwyer, Krebsbach and Duggan. Commissi�'ne� Tilsen had notified the Commission that he would be late. Al�o present were Public Works Director Jim Danielson, Planning Consultant John Uban, Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser. � APPROVAL OF MINIITTS Commissioaer 1992, Minutes Commissioaer AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Duggaa moved approval of the February 25, with corrections Friel secoaded the motion. INFORblATION ON CABLSCASTING OF PLANNING CONIl2ISSION ME13TINGS Ms. Judy Skeie-Voss, Northern Dakota County Cable Communications, gave a brief summary regarding the broadcasting of Planning Commission meetings. Ms. Voss submitted information regarding television etiquette and informed the Commission that the meetings will be aired live starting at 7:30 o'clock P.M. beginning in April. CASL NO. 92-08: RAAK - VARIANCis � Mr. and Mrs. John Raak were present to discuss their request for a simple lot split. Chair Dwyer explained that the Raak family owns two platted lots at 728 Wentworth Avenue. He stated that both lots meet the minimum requirements of the Zoning Ordinance in terms of lot size and lot width. He explained that Mr. Raak proposes to add twenty-five feet (25') from the larger eastern lot, where Mr. Raak's father's home is located, to the western lot for the purpose of creating two lots of equal dimension. Chair Dwyer explained that the newly created lot will have a single family home constructed on it where Mr. and Mrs. Raak propose to live. � March 25, 1992 Page 2 In response to a question from Commissioner Dreelan, Mr. Raak explained they are proposing to construct a rambler style home. Nlr. Raak submitted a book to the Commission showing the style of home they hope to construct. Chair Dwyer noted the Planner's concern of compatibility of the proposed house with the surrounding neighborhood. Mr. Raak responded;.that they feel the proposed••house is compatible as mbst homes on the street are'rambl�ers. Commissioner Krebsbach stated she had driveniby��he site and noted that Mr. Raak's lot is rather de�p and the Evergreen Knoll Addition is quite a distance away. Chair Dwyer noted, as per Mr. Raak's site plan and the Planner's report, that there is a screen-house and a landscape structure that infringe on the western side of the subject property. Chair Dwyer stated the Planner noted that the City should require some assurance that the adjacent property owner is not making any claim to the area of infringement before the granting of the lot split. Mr. Raak responded that he has spoken to and received signatures of consent with the property owners and the adjacent property as required by the City. He stated that the adjacent property owner did not indicate a problem as he signed the consent form. ' Chair Dwyer informed Mr. Raak that the width of the right-of-way for Wentworth Avenue is sixty feet (60'). He stated that because Wentworth Avenue is a County road, the County has requested an additional three feet of right-of-way. He stated the County is requesting that Mr. Raak dedicate an additional three feet (3') of right- of-way. Mr. Raak stated that he has no problem with the request. Commissioaer Krebsbach moved to waive the subdivision fees and the public heariag. ' Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Comnnissioner Friel moved to recommend that the City Council graat the lot split with the condition that aa additional three feet (3') be dedicated for the purpose of County right-of-way. Coamiissioaer Krebsbach secoaded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 r' Ma.rch 24, 1992 Page 3 HEARING - CASE NO. 92-06: ANDLRSON - , CIIP FOR PIID, �ETLANDS PERMIT, SIIBDIVISION AND VARIANCE Ms. Kathleen An�erson and Mr. Robert Wicker were present to discuss Ms.��,nderson's request for a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development,� Wetla.ds;-Permit, Subdivision and Variance for the purpose of �ons�ructing a single family home. Ms. Anderson explained that she would like to plat a 1.3 acre lot, which she is purchasing from Somerset 19 Condominiums. She explained she will not disturb the wetlands with the construction of the home. Chair Dwyer stated this property is included in the Somerset 19 Planned Unit Development. He stated that this property is part of an area designated for open space within the Somerset 19 Planned Unit Development. He stated he is not inclined to recommend approval of this development as there is nothing that compels the City to grant these changes. Ms. Anderson explained that initially when the Somerset 19 development was first approved, the project covered a smaller area . She explained that in 19 75 , land was added to the development which was designated for common open space. Mr. Wicker explained that because additional land was added to the open space within the planned unit development, there is an excess amount of land. He stated that the additional property is not needed to satisfy the open space requirement within the PUD. He stated the open space designated in 1971 satisfies the requirement within the PUD. Mr. Wicker stated the police department has notified'1�ls. Anderson that dumping is occurring on the site. He stated that this property has deteriorated in the past years and that constructing a home on this property will not only increase the City's tax revenue but also help beautify the area. He stated the proposed home will blend in with the existing neighborhood. Commissioner Friel cited Section 22.16(3) of the Zoning Ordinance stating that no changes may be made in an approved final development within a planned unit development plan subject to several conditions. He stated that he agrees with Chair Dwyer in that he has not seen or heard anything which gives a basis within the City's Zoning Ordinance for a recommendation to the City . March 24, 1992 Page 4 Council to ma.ke a change to the Planned Unit Development . He stated that it appears the Planning Commission is being asked to ignore the provisions as stipulated within the Zoning Ordinance. He stated the Planning Commission and City Council need to see justification in the provisions of the Ordinance and at this point, they have not . � � • • . , Mr. Wicker responded that the parcel of- land �. Anderson desires to subdivide is not the original op n�pace of the planned unit development. He stated this:�arcel was an additional piece of land added to the Association's already designated open space requirement. He stated if that land is removed, there is still ample open space as required by the initial planned unit development. He stated it would be in the best interest of the community that this land be developed using Ms. Anderson's proposal for a single family home. Commissioner Friel responded that according to City staff and Planner, the additional land is include within the planned unit development as open space. Planner Uban concurred with Commissioner Friel, in stating that the Association added this parcel of land to the planned unit development and that it is on the tax roils as open space. � Commissioner Koll asked if Somerset 19 Association sought the selling of this property. Mr. Wicker responded that the Association has and that they would like to see the land developed as it will improve the value of the property. Mr. Guthmann, President of the Somerset 19 Association, explained the Association purchased the land in 1975 from the Wodke family. He explained the Association does not need the land and that it is in the Association's best interest to sell the land as the Association needs the income for their Maintenance Reserve Fund. He explained that he had discussed the possibility of selling the property with Planner Dahlgren several years ago, and at that time Planner Dahlgren indicated that developing the land for single family use could be considered. Commissioner Tilsen arrived at 8:08 o'clock P.M. In response to a question from Commissioner Friel, Mr. Guthmann stated the land in question is over two blocks away from the condominiums and that the proposed development would make better use of the property than what exists on it now. March 24, 1992 Page 5 Commissioner Krebsbach stated she would like to see the Planning Commission review the surrounding parcels to get a sense of direction as to what type of development is proposed, if any, within the areas of Wentworth Avenue/Dodd Road/First Avenue. In response to a question from Chair Dwyer, Ms. Anderson stated her requ�st for a ten foot (10') variance is due to the lack of��uilding room due.to the wetlands. She stated she would like to have a backyard are� as,she is proposing a walkout home. �'' Commissioner Krebsbach stated the Commission srhould find out what land is still available for residential development and park land development. Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated there are a few parcels of land to the north that could still be subdivided but that most of the land in the immediate area has been developed or is park. Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public. Mrs. Wodke, adjacent property owner, asked for the definition of a planned unit development. She further commented that she was under the understanding the wetlands are a protected area and that no development can occur on wetlands. Chair Dwyer briefly summarized the definition of a planned unit development and the process of wetlands development. Mrs. Wodke stated that she and her husband had been considering subdividing their land. She stated that they were unsure as to how Ms. Anderson's application would impact their future considerations of their land. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that based on Mrs. Wodke's input, the Commission should get a better sense of what property owners, with acreage, are proposing to do with their land. Mrs. Wodke informed the Commission that"'she and her husband own one acre of land. Mr. Nelson, 698 Third Avenue, stated his concern for the water table should Ms. Anderson develop the land. Public Works Director Danielson informed Mr. Nelson that a soil survey was completed for the site and that survey indicates the soil to be adequate for construction. Mr. Linnell, 1407 Cherry Hill Road, noted his concern for the wetlands. Chair Dwyer acknowledged that the Planning Commission received,a photo copy regarding the type of house Ms. Anderson is proposing. Commissioner Friel until the Planaing o'Clock P.M... March 24, 1992 Page 6 moved to table the public hearing Co�ission of April 28, 1992, at 7:45 Commissioaer Krebsbach amended the motion directing staff to sead a letter to property owaers commuaicatiag to them that the Plaani�ag Commission is interested ia hearing their thoughts �in the possibility of future development oa properties that have aot beea developed.;��. -,� �;: Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the amended m�ption. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 HEARING: CASE NO. 92-04: H�TRY SIBLEY SENIOR SIGN VARIANCE HIGH SCHOOL - Ms. Lois Rockney, Director of Business Affairs for Independent School District No. 197, was present to discuss a request for a sign size variance to allow installation of a sign on the south wall of Henry Sibley High School in the form of individual plastic letters. Ms. Rockney explained the letters are to be four feet (4') in height and the sign is seventy-eight feet (78') in length, total square footage area 312 square feet. In response to a question from Chair Dwyer, Ms. Rockney explained that the sign is a donation from the Class of 1991 and that there is not enough funds, at this time, to light the sign. She stated that eventually, they would like the sign to be lit. In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Ms. Rockney stated the School District had not discussed the possibility of removing some of the flood lighting. She stated the present flood lights are there for security reasons and that she would consider reviewing the issue of removing some of the lights with the School District. Ms . Rockney informed the Commission that the intent of the sign request is to address the fact that the school is not easily identified from the Highway. She stated that many people (school teams, business associates, etc. ) have difficulty in identifying where the school is. Commiasioner Kreb bach stated that the School District needs to think o s nage on a long term basis and have a comprehensive isgn plan for Henry Sibl'ey High School. C March 24, 1992 Page 7 She statedthis would help determine when enough signs are enough. Commissioner Friel explained that according to the City' s Zoning Ordinance, in order for the Planning Commission to recommend approval of a variance, the applicant must present a case,of hardship. � ••� • , ,d Ms. Rockney stated that the existing si�ns�'�on the property have been vandalized. She stated �,�hat it is anticipated that if this sign variance is approved, the sign located on the frontage road facing Highway 110 would be removed. Commissioner Dreelan inquired as to whether this proposed sign is the same as St. Thomas Academy's existing sign. Ms. Rockney stated that to her knowledge it is the same. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that it would be helpful to erect a sign on Highway 110 giving direction as to where the high school is located. Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public. Mr. Russ Wahl, 631 Callahan Place, stated that he sees no reason for the City to grant a variance. He stated his concern as a tax payer and that the School District is spending money on items that are not necessary. He stated that he agrees with Commissioner Krebsbach that there should be a directional sign placed on Highway 110 as to the location of the high school. Ms. Rockney stated the Class of 1991 chose to donate a sign to the school district. She stated the Class of 1991 felt that installing the sign would give "`the students a sense of identity. Ms. Marsha Rnuth, Parents Committee Chair for the Class of 1991, stated that a new sign is needed as it is very difficult to find the school. She explained the Class of 1991 chose to donate the sign as it gives the students a real sense of identity and that it will be very helpful to those people who are unfamiliar with the location of the school. In response to a question from Chair Dwyer, Mr. Wahl stated that the request for the sign will not interfere with his lifestyle as the aign will not be seen from his place of residence. 0 March 24, 1992 Page 8 The Commission briefly di�cussed their concern over �he size oi the sign.. Mr. Dick Kruse, Midway� Sign. Gompany, explained that the size of the si.gn a.s necessary as it wi].1 be seen from a distance. He �tated the sign is much lzke St. Thomas' sign. He �tated that na �unding has been allocated for the lighting af �he sign. He e�Iained the ��rontage road sign is ald and reitting, the monument sign ka�.s been vandalized and the sign over the main entrance af �.he �chool is unreadable. `��., -; ; �;. Pl.anner Uban s�ated his concern for how the letters will be attached to the building. Mr. Kruse stated that the letter� wi1.1 not be caulked. He s�ated the letters could be stud mounted. Ke stated that �he letters will n.ot be raised as birds tend to make their nests ancl they may cause a great dea2 0� mess. Mr, Kruse fur�her sta�ed that he did no� install the north entrance si.gn. Commis�ioner Krebsbach asked if the proposed sign and the sign above the north entrance wi11 be similar in characteristics. Mr. Kruse s�ated that the color of �he letters on the north sign are the wrong color for a sign that needs to be seen from a distance. In re�pan�e to a. question from Commissioner Til.sen, Mr Kruse sta�ed �he an�icipated life �pan of the �ign is 10 �0 1.5 years. Mr. Jim Ma.zzoni, Ca1.3.ahan Place, s�ated that he has talked to various peaple a.nquiring whether �hey have a problem finding the school. He stated that their problem ha� been locating the parking lot and entrance of �he school , He stated tha�. it would be to the benef it of the School District i� they were ta loak into instal.ling a sign locating the parking and entrance o£ the high school. Admini�tra�ive Assistant Batchelder �ubmitted pictures and sample lettering of �he sign ta the Commission as submit�ed by Midway Sign Company. Commissioner Tilsen s�ated that the City should request the Department of Transportation ta install directional signage on Highway 110. In response ta a ques�.ion from Commi�sioner Friel, Ms. Rockney stated that when the funding is available, �he School Distric� would like the sign to be lightecl. Commissioaer Roll moved to elose the public hearing. Co�rnnissioner Friel seconded the mation. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 f Ma.rch 24, 1992 Page 9 Commissioner Friel stated that he believes there is a real problem in locating the parking and entrance of Sibley High School. He stated the Commission has had a problem in setti�ng precedent with regards to the granting of sign variana�s. He stated he is concerned with the aesthetics of the sign and he is opposed to ].'.ghting the sign. He stated that lighting of signs in a�esidential area is obtrusive and inappropriate. •; Commissioner Duggan stated he has no objection with the proposed sign. He stated that he is against lighting the sign. Commissioner Koll moved to recommend that the City Council graat a variaace to allow a total 312 square foot, lighted sign to be mouated on the south side of Heary Sibley Seaior High School building. Commissioaer Krebsbach moved to amend the motion adding that the School District coasider coordinatiag the existing north sign aad the proposed south sign designs, put forth an effort ia installing directional signage oa 8ighway 110 aad directional sigaage on Delaware Aveaue. Commissioaer Krebsbach seconded the ameaded motion. Chair Dwyer stated that the School District has not proven hardship. He further stated that MnDOT would have to be contacted in order for the directional signage to be placed on Highway 110. Commissioner Dreelan moved to amend the motioa stating that lightiag of the sign is not included within the variaace. ' Commissioner Roll accepted the amendment to her original motioa. Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the amended motion. Commissioner Tilsen stated that he is opposed to the sign variance. He stated the Class of 1991 should look into a more appropriate use of the money donation. AYES: 5 NAYS : 2 , DDPYER, TILSEN March 24, 1992 Page 10 HEARING: CASE NO. 92-07: ANDREWS - WALGRSEN COMPANY CIIP Mr. Steven Andrews, Technician with the Walgreen Company, was present to �.iscuss Walgreen Company's request for a conditional �us� permit to install a satellite. dish antenna located at 2535 Pilot Knob Road, Sui�e 1,20. �;. Mr. Andrews explained the purpose of inst�lling the satellite dish is to provide the facili'ty direct communications with other Walgreen facilities and the corporate headquarters located in Chicago. He explained the antenna is to be mounted on a pole at the north side of the building. He explained that the antenna dish will be six feet (6') in diameter. He further explained that the antenna will be mounted on a twenty-five feet (25') pole. Mr. Andrews stated the dish needs to be over the pitch of the roof. He explained that they would like to place the dish on the roof of the building, but the landlord will not allow Walgreen Company to do.so. In response to a question from Commissioner Krebsbach, Mr. Andrews stated that Walgreen's has used satellite communications for over three years. He stated that over 90 percent of the stores use this communication and that their office is one of the last to convert. He stated that they have been using phone lines for communications and that it is getting very expensive to continue with this form of communication. He stated that the satellite will help assist in repairing equipment as most of the equipment is now sent out of this particular office for repairs. In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Mr. Andrews stated that the satellite communications system will only be available for Walgreen's use. Administrative Assistant Batchelder explained that there are satellite dishes within Mendota Heights. He stated that if a satellite dish is not mounted on the roof, it is considered an accessory structure under the Zoning Ordinance requirements. He stated that within the Industrial Zoning District accessory structures require Conditional Use Permits and that the height limitation is 45 feet. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 March 24, 1992 Page 11 Commissioner Friel stated that the Commission would be illadvised to take action on this application due to pendiag litigatioa oa another matter regarding antenna height within the City. Se moved to recommend that the Plaaning Commission table the request for a conditional use permit uatil April 28, 1992, at 8:00 o'clock P.M. Commissioner Du�gan seconded the motion. ��•� � �� . :� ,i; . Chair Dwyer stated City staff will discuss this matter with the City's attorney and will report back to the Commission in April. Chair Dwyer called at recess at 9:20 o'clock P.M. Chair Dwyer reconvened the meeting at 9:27 o'clock P.M. CONTINIIED HLARING: CASL NO. 92-02: THE ROTTLIIND HOMES Mr. Todd Stutz, Executive Vice President of Rottlund Homes, Mr. Don Jenssen, Rottlund Homes and Mr. John Bannigan, Attorney representing the applicant, were present to discuss The Rottlund Homes' request for a Rezoning, CUP for PUD and Subdivision to allow the construction of a 68 unit townhome development in the southeast quadrant of Mendota Heights Road and Dodd Road. Mr. Stutz explained to the Planning Commission that he and Mr. Jenssen have submitted revised drawings which identifies specific information the Planning Commission had requested at their February 25, 1992, meeting along with a letter specifically relating to additional information that the Commission, City staff and Pol�ice and Fire Department had requested. He stated that they believe the information, as submitted in letter form dated March 17, 1992, addresses all issues as discussed during the February 25th Planning Commission meeting and subsequent meetings with City staff and planning consultant. Mr. Stutz explained the total area of the Planned Unit Development is 10.52 acres. He explained that their proposed development will consist of 9.58 acres and the rema.ining .94 acre will rema.in under the ownership of R.A. Putnam and Associates who intends to develop the land as a day care facility. He explained that according to the letter from Mr. Putnam dated March 6, 1992, Mr. March 24, 1992 Page 12 Putnam is requesting only sketch plan approval at this time. Chair Dwyer stated that there seems to be inconsistencies between the Rottlund letter and Mr. Putnam's letter, specifically relating to the total acreage of the planned unit developmen�. Mr. Stutz confirmed to the Commission that the total �creage of the planned unit development is 10.52 acres. - �� - :, Mr. Stutz explained that the 68 unit townhome�complexes will consist of seven - eight unit buildings and one - twelve unit building. He explained that there will be berms constructed along Mendota Heights Road. He further explained that the buildings will be two story buildings with the total height (at the highest peak) twenty-eight feet (28'). Mr. Stutz explained, as per the Planning Commission's request, the listing of lenders references. He explained that Rottlund Homes is actively involved, throughout the Twin Cities area, in a lending relationship with specific lenders. In response to a question from Chair Dwyer, Mr. Stutz explained that he is not able to specifically identify which lender will be financing the project as lenders will not review a proposed development until there is preliminary plat approval. He explained that submitting the list of lenders should prove that the Rottlund Company has the ability to undertake the development as proposed. Chair Dwyer stated that Rottlund Homes has not provided the Commission with the financial information needed as required by the City's Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Stutz responded that due to the proprietary nature of the Rottlund Company, corporate financial statements will not be provided to the Commission as this information would provide competitors with a potential competitive advantage. In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Mr. Stutz stated that the price range for each townhome will be $80,000 to $90,000. He explained that the retail price of this product is roughly $25,000 higher than the product Centex Homes is presently constructing in their nearby development. Mr. Stutz explained that the target market they hope to satisfy will be for empty nester age 55 and older. He explained the proposed townhomes will have a main floor master bedroom. He further explained that standard features within each home include wood floors, oak trim, ceramic baths with exterior materials March 24, 1992 Page 13 of brick and aluminum. He stated there will be upgrades available as each unit will be built specifically for the potential buyer. Mr. Stutz stated that the existing surveys show errors in , the size of the exception shown on the plat because they are based on an,�, erroneous centerline in Docid �Road. He � stated an exactf�boundary survey is in process and will be �- supplied to the City prior to final plat app�oval. � In response to a question from Chair Dwyer, ,��Mr. Stutz stated the approxima.te density of dwelling units is 7.1 units per acre. He stated that this density is within the Zoning Code requirements. Mr. Stutz explained that the exterior ma.terials will be brick and aluminum with an upgrade in shingles. He stated that the siding will have a thirty year warranty and the shingles will have a twenty year warranty. He stated that through the Association dues, there will be money set aside for the maintenance of items not covered under a apecific warranty. Commissioner Friel stated that under the development schedule, the development of the Outlot is not included. He further stated that no elevation and utility plans have been submitted with respect to the Outlot. He stated that the City's Zoning Ordinance requires that this specific information is to be submitted. Mr. Stutz stated that Mr. Putnam had made it clear that what he is asking of the Commission is a sketch plan approval. Commissioner Friel stated that the Outlot is a part of the planned unit development and that all of the required information must be submitted. Commissioner Friel noted that the minimum requirement �for a day care center, according to the City's Zoning Ordinance, is one acre. Mr. Stutz explained that the estimated amount of developed open space including Outlot A is 236,338 square feet, 51 percent or 5.43 acres. He stated that the Rottlund parcel contains 49.4 percent open space. He stated all open space or common area will be governed by a homeowners association. He explained there will be automa.tic underground irrigations systems for all landscaped and sodded areas. Mr. Stutz explained that a copy of the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Easements, Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation for the proposed homeowner's association . March 24, 1992 Page 14 has been submitted for the Commission's review. Commissioner Friel stated that the only employment opportunities generated by this development wil'1 be that of construction workers on the site. He stated that, at this point, there is no way of determining what type of employment the day care facility will gene�ate•. r� . Commissioner Duggan stated that accordi g:..to his calculations, over 1/2 of the proposed dev�lopment is hard surface or buildings. �„� In response to a question from Commissioner Koll regarding the submitted Covenants, Mr. Stutz responded that it is not Rottlund's policy to develop property as rental units. He stated that the clause within the Association's Bylaws is to be fair to the residents who are unable to sell their property. Mr. Stutz explained that preserving and ma.intaining the development is an important priority. He explained that the exterior materials require no maintenance, the streets (although private) will be constructed to City standards, the landscaping will be maintained with an irrigation system. He explained that approximately $5.00, per unit, of the Association dues will be set aside for a Reserve Account. Commissioner Duggan stated that $5.00 per unit seems to be low. Commissioner Tilsen expressed his concerns with safety issues with respect to the Police and Fire Departments accessibility into the development. Mr. Stutz explained that Braun Engineering surveyed the site and indicated that conditions are adequate. He explained that they have conducted a tree survey. He explained�that the species of trees located on the site are mostly boxelder and poplar. He stated that they will be relocating trees by using a tree spade. He stated that they have calculated to install approximately 270 trees. He further explained that the property to the east of the proposed development has the majority of trees which is owned by a Mendota Woods Subdivision resident. Mr. Stutz explained it is estimated the development will generate 476 trips per day based upon 7 trips per residential unit. He stated that the traffic that could be generated through the development of the outlot was not included in the estimates. March 24, 1992 Page 15 In response to a queation from Commissioner Ko11, Mr. Stutz e�cplained that throughaut the developmen� site, there is a diiference in �.opography. He expZained that retaining wall.s are neces�ary. He stated the material used for the retaining wal.ls will be keys�.one blocks and boulders aG the entrance af the development, He fur�her stated that dr�inage is taken into account�wi�h each re�aining wall ��System. Mr. Stutz bri.efly explained �.he height of retaining walls al.ong the� east ��end-, of �he developmen�. and along the I-494 ramp. '� 1 In response to a question fram Commissioner�Friel, Mr. Stutz explained that the dot�.ed 1ine, which appears an the grading/drainage plan represents an erosion control ~ de�crice which is used during the construction period. Mr. Stutz explained relative to the Police and Fire Department concerns, the ca.rculation �ystem now proceeds through the development with �.he linking of �he cul-de- sacs with a 3oop drive. He �urther stated �hat street lighting w3.11 ]ae used at the entrance and throughout �he cu1.-de-sacs. He iurther stated that each dwelling will have exteriar lights. Mr. Stutz stated that at this time, no en�,rance monument is proposed. He sta�ed that signs will be limited to traffic signs and temporary marketing signage. Commissianer Tilsen expressed his concern with the proliferata.on of signage. He stated that one sign at each entrance (no parking signs? should be sufficient. Mr. Stutz respanded that �hey would prefer to da that, however, minimum signage is often ignored. Chair Dwyer stated, according to the drawings, tha�. there is propased to be 30 off stree� parking stall�, 100 garage slo�s and 100 parking spaces in the front area of the garages for a total of 230 spaces. Chair Dwyer stated tha1� according �.o his calculations, if 40 parking spo�s were removed due to the prohibi�ing of parking in front of garage stalls, the to�.al amaunt of parking available is 130. Mr. Stutz responded tha� Rottlund Hames has complied wi�h the requirements of parking as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. Commis�ioner Friel asl�ed i� Ro�tlund Homes is ins�.alla.ng a four �oo�. high fence between existing parki.ng areas and adjacent developments. Mr. Stutz responded that a fence is not proposed. He stated that berms will be constructed. , March 24, 1992 Page 16 Commissioner Friel stated that Ordinance 401, Seciton 12.5 (2) states that no parking areas may be within 10 feet of the principle structure. Commissioner Friel stated that the private streets are too narrow. He inquired if the intention of having private narrow streets and parking stalls in front of the garage was to maximize the d�nsity. He stated with public streets there would be��ess units. � . Commissioner Friel stated that the Cit�'' s�'� Zoning Ordinance does not provide direction for privat�.e streets. Mr. Stutz responded that it would be up to tYie Planning Commission to review as part of the HR-PUD process. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that the proposed development seems to anticipate no children living within the development. She questioned where children would play. She stated there could be 120 children living � within the development. Mr. Stutz stated children could play in the open space of the development such as the berm area and holding pond area. Commissioner Krebsbach questioned where the residents walk. She stated that the proposed development does not seem to take into account pedestrian safety. Mr. Stutz responded that the development is as safe as any other development in the City. He explained that there is not a lot of through traffic on private streets as opposed to public streets. He further stated that there is a trail way along Mendota Heights Road. Commissioner Rrebsbach stated that Rottlund Homes is remiss in not having considered both children and pedestrian safety. In response to a question from Chair Dwyer, Planner Uban stated that it is very common to have segregated parking. He stated that they could designate off street parking. Chair Dwyer stated that the City could accommodate this factor but then there would be less green space within the development. In response to a question from Commissioner Tilsen, Mr. Stutz stated that twenty feet (20') is the depth of the shortest driveway. Commissioner Friel stated that the Subdivision Ordi requires a 30 foot driveway. Mr. Stutz responded thta this is a proposed Planned Unit Development with ' ate drives. Commissioner Duggan referred to the Fire Department's concerns regarding street design and turning radii. Commisaioner Duggan questioned whether or not fire trucks are able to get out of this proposed development. Planner Uban stated the latest plan shows a hammerhead March 24, 1992 Page 17 design. He stated that he has not been able to compare the latest plan to the earlier plan. Mr. Stutz stated that the radius is more than adequate . He further stated that each building has interior sprinkler systems. In response to a question from Commissioner Krebsbach, Mr. Stutz state�3 there is 475 feet from Mendota Heights Road to the twe�ve unit building. Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public�' �'� Mr. Mike Wier, Bridgeview Shores resident, stated that the requirement for a planned unit development is 10 acres and this proposed development is only 9.5 acres. He expressed his concerns for property valuations, density and the amount of traffic that could be generated. Public Works Director briefly explained the process of applying for traffic signals. He explained that the City has requested the State to install traffic signals at Highway 149 and Mendota Heights Road several times. He explained the State has found that traffic signals, at this time, not warranted. Mr. Norm Linnell, Bridgeview Shores resident, stated the Commission should keep in mind that this area is currently zoned for single family homes. He stated his concern for private streets, the lack of park land. He stated his concerns for the lack of buffering between the proposed development and Mendota Woods. He stated more information should be obtained from Mr. Putnam regarding his development plans. He stated his concerns for property values should a commercial development be approved. A Mendota Woods resident, owner of Lot 2 Mendota Woods, stated her concerns for trees, traffic, children and pedestrian safety. She further stated her concerns for the lack of green space. She stated the Commission should request more detailed information regarding the day care facility. She stated she would like to see single family homes constructed on this site. She stated she would like to see the erosion devices clarified. Mr. Stutz responded that erosion measures have been taken into account as provided on the grading plan. He stated that measures are taken to protect sediment from going into the sewer system. He stated a special fabric cloth type fencing is used that allows water, but not sediment � to filter through. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 �� � m March 24, 1992 Page 18 Mr. Stan Linnell, 1407 Cherry Hill Road, stated there is a very high percentage of hard surface within the development. He stated more transition is needed and that the roadways are too narrow. He further stated walkways should be provided. He stated additional screening should be provided at the northern end of the development. � r� Mr. Stutz explained that buildings will have additional features to protect against airplane noi�e,�''meeting standard FHA requirements. He stated the outdoor noise levels to be in the range of 62 to 65 decibel range. Mr. Stutz explained that an additional $2,500 has been provided to the City for additional reviews required by this project. He stated the Rottlund Company is requesting that any monies not used, be return upon approval of the project. Coamnissioner Krebsbach moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Friel seconded the motion. Commissioner Friel moved to recommend that the City Couacil deay the Conditioaal IIse Permit for a Planned IIait Development, the rezoaiag to HR-PUD, and the Sketch Plan approval for the followiag reasons: 1. The proposal does not meet the criteria for a Planned IIait Developmeat set forth ia Sectioas 13 aad 22 of the Zoniag Ordiaance in that it does aot: a. preserve the aatural aad sceaic qualities for open areas, b. limit development to a scale appropriate to the existing terraia aad surroundiag land use, c. result in an effective aad uaified treatment of the development possibilities on the project site, or d. harmoaize with the existiag and proposed development ia the areas surrouadiag the site and, ia fact, instead of preserving open areas and aatural and sceaic qualities, the proposed Planned IInit Development dimiaishes opea space and maximizes densities by utiliziag un.safe private streets� of inappropriate - widths, the consequeace of which is to have a result :� . 2. � March 24, 1992 Page 19 eatirely opposite that which is contemplated in the utilizatioa of a Planned IIait Development. The Planaed IInit Development does not meet the definitioaal requiremeats of Sectioas 22.1(a) and (b). 3. The graatiag o� the Conditional IIse Permit requested would have an ,�dverse and detrimental effect upon the health, safety and welfare of the future occu aats of the project site and on existing and future o�cupants of surrouadiag laads. It will seriously ;depreciate surrounding property value aad the projeat is aot therefore ia harmony with the general purpose aad intent of the City Zoaiag Ordiaaace aad, ia particular, does aot meet the requirements for a Coaditioaal IIse Permit specified in Sections 5. 6(5) of the Zoniag Ordiaaace. Ia particular, the private streets have the potential of creating health and safety problems, as evidenced by the coacerns expressed, amoag others, by the reports of the fire and police departments of the City, even though it is recognized that appareatly some changes were made in the plaas ia� respoase to those reports. 4. The proposal before u specific requiremeats Ordiaances of the City, s fails to meet the followiag of the Zoaing aad�Subdivisioa among others: a. Outlot A, which calls for a day care center, does aot meet the one-acre miaimum specified by Section 7.2(8) or ia the alteraative there is an iaconsisteacy betweea the site descriptioa and dimensions contaiaed ia the plans presented by the developer aad the developer's blarch 17, 1992, letter. It fails ia other respects as well to meet the requirements of Section 7.2(8) of the Zoning Ordiaaace ia that the applicaat is lackiag evidence of registration with the State of Minnesota�� as required. b. The streets are private streets and are twenty-four feet (24') wide iastead of the minimum thirty feet (30') required by Section 5.3(a) of the Subdivision Ordiaaace. Private street width provided for by the developer is the width permitted for private driveways only. It appears that the use of private streets was appareatly utilized as a meaas to maximize housing units in the proposal aad minimize open space, which is entirely incoasistent with the purposes for which a Planned IInit Development is permitted, particularly oa such a small site. Such streets also have the potential for creating public 6i safety problems because of maintenance and snow removal. Ma.rch 24, 1992 Page 20 problems related to c. The Site Developmeat Plan fails to comply with Sectioas 5.6 (2)b6, 7 aad 8; 5.6 (2) c 3, 4 and 5; 5.7 (2) a6, 7 aad 8; 5.7 (3)b 3, 4 and 5; 22.5 (1) and 22.5 (4) wi,th respect to Outlot A; aad in general with Sec,tions 5.6 (2) d6, 5.6 (2) e3, 5.7 (3) c6, 5.7 (3) d3 aad 12.5 (7) . . � :., . d. e. The proposed parking outside, off stree� fails to comply with Sectioa 12.5(2). There is ao public street abutting Lots 2, 3 and 5 as required by Sectioa 3.2(65) of the Zoning Ordiaaace. f. The Covenaats of the 8omeowaer's Association which provide for rental of the uaits is inconsistent with the representation that these units are "for sale" units. g. Traffic studies have not taken iato account the day care ceater traffic of the Planaed IInit Development. Commissioner Duggan secoaded the motion. Commissioaer Krebsbach offered a frieadly amendment statiag that the proposed plan does aot reflect open space area for both childrea aad pedestriaa travel. Commissioaer Friel accepted the Frieadly Ameadmeat. Commissioaer Friel moved to iaclude within his motion that the plaa fails to comply with the requirement of feaciag as required by the Zoaing Ordinance, on the aorth side of the property. Commissioaer Tilsen offered a Friendly Amendment stating that private driveway length should be much less than 500 feet. Commissioner Friel accepted the Friendly Amendment. Commissioaer Duggan seconded the Friendly Ameadments and the addition to the original motion. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 :� '! �� March 24, 1992 Page 21 MISCELLANEOIIS The Planning Commission briefly discussed the possibility of visiting the Kathleen Anderson site. Administrative Assistant Batchelder explained, with regards to Mr.� Guthmann's comments regarding Planner Dahlgren, that G�'ity staff had informed the applicants and Somerset 19 that Planner Dahlgren did no� have the authority in to approve planning requests an e�plained that only City Council has the authority to;grant any planning approvals. VERBAL REVIEW ADJOIIRN AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 Public Works Director Danielson provided a verbal review for the planning items at the previous City Council meeting. Commissioner Krebsbach moved to adjourn the Planning Commissioa to Saturday, March 28, 1992 at 9:00 o'clock A.M. for the purpose of visiting the Rathleen M. Anderson site located at the southwest quadrant of Third Avenue and Clement Street. Commissioaer Krebsbach further directed City staff to sead mailed aotice to all property owaers withia 350 feet of the requested Planaed IInit Developmeat Ameadmeat, Variance, D�letlaads Permit aad Subdivision. Coamnissioaer Duggaa seconded the motioa. Commissioner Tilsen informed the Commission that he would not be able to attend the meeting. TIME OF ADJOIIRNMENT: 11:45 o'clock P.M. Respectfully submitted, Kimberlee K. Blaeser Senior Secretary m MEMO Date: 3-27-92 T0: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: � Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer 4•�•� �- G v. i. • SUBJECT: Building Activity Report fo� March 7992 1 '� CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE 92 YEdR'TO�DATE 91 BUILDING � � PERMITS: No. Valuation Fee Collected � No. Valuation Fee Collected � No. Valuation Fee Collected � � SFD 13 2,009,264.00 17,836.44 � 26 4,311,547.00 37,369.19 � 10 1,651,771.00 14,334.40 APT 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 TOWNHWSE 3 470,876.00 4,164.61 � 4 556,106.00 5,115.84 � 3 278,041.00 3,017.04 CONDO 24 1,691,014.00 10,155.76 � 24 1,691,014.00 10,155.76 � 0 0 MISC. 14 101,362.00 1,981.45 � 20 744,753.00 2,791.15 � 15 76,835.00 1,434.55 C/I 6 73,470.00 1,233.01 � 13 3,408,615.00 15,404.94 � 16 7,274,766.00 31,690.90 -------------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Sub Total 60 4,345,986.00 35,371.27 � 87 10,112,035.00 70,836.88 � 44 9,281,413.00 50,476.89 TRADE � I PERMITS- I I • � � Plunbing 7 174.00 � 32 1173.00 � 18 777.00 Nater 13 65.00 � 32 160.00 � 20 100.00 Sewer 17 192.50 � 23 402.50 � 11 192.50 Heat, AC, � � & Gas 15 827.50 � 45 2,696.00 � 31 3,351.00 -------------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Sub Total 46 1,259.00 � 132 4,431.50 � 80 4,420.50 Licensinq• � � � � Contractor's � � Licenses 20 500.00 � 185 4,625.00 � 232 5,800.00 -------------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Total 126 4,345,986.00 37,130.27 � 404 10,112,035.00 79,893.38 � 356 9,281,413.00 60,697.39 NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac, and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee, and valuation amounts. 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �� � March 31, 1992 � TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adm' FROM: 7ames E. Daniel n Public Works D' SUBJECT: Public Works Summer Helper Every summer Public Works hires 46 temporary employees to help out in the Parks, Streets and Utility Deparlments. These summer helpers must be at least 18 years old. We have also always given first option to rehiring those returning helpers who did satisfactory jobs the year before and to Mendota Heights residents. We are anticipating this to be a particularly busy summer with all the new parks. School do not get out his early and we are normally not able to start any helpers until7une, however Tom Weiss did not attend the spring quarter and is available immediately. Terry Blum, the Parks Leadperson, would very much li.ke to hire Tom Weiss now to assist with the spring cleanup in the parks. Summer helpers were budgeted for in 1992 and there is adequate money withi.n the budget to begin Tom Weiss immediately, the remaining 3-5 workers will be selected later to begi.a work around June 1 st. RECOMMENDATION: Tom Weiss has worked for the Parks Department in the past as a rink attendant and did a goad job. I recommend that we hire him effective Apri18, 1992 to help out in the Parks Department. His wage would be $5.50 per hour. •—� � ACTION REQUIl2ED: If Council desires to implement the recommendation they should pass a motion hiring Tom Weiss as a temporary summer employee for $5.50 per hour. A list of the remaining summer helpers will be submitted for Council for approval at a later date. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS March 31, 1992 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini FROM: 7ames E. Dani lso Public Works D'" ' SUBJECT: New Full-time Maintenance Worker DISCUSSION• A new maintenance worker was budgeted for within the Parks Department for 1992 > According to the Public Works Union Contract, the fust step`in filling vacancies is to post for the vacancy. This given first chance to any existing public works personnel to transfer from their department to the new position. The Parks vacancy was posted and 7ohn Boland who was hired last December to replace Duane Toenyen in the Street Department has requested to transfer to Parks. 7ohn worked in the Parks I3epartment before as a temporary employee and the transfer from Streets to Parks will be an easy one. Because John desires to transfer into the new Parks position, there will again be an vacancy in the Street Deparlment. When we hired 7ohn in December he was selected from a pool of 11 very qualified finalists. We would very much like to select another Street Department employee from this same pool of finalists thus avoiding the lengthy process of advertising for and grading a whole new paol of candidates. We have contacted the 10 remaini.ng candidates and 8 of them are still interested. RECONIlVIENDATION• I recommend that 7ohn Boland be allowed to transfer from the Street Department into the newly created Parks position (effective upon hiring a replacement for hun) and that a new Street Deparlment employee be selected from the finalists selected in December, 1991. ACTION RFAUIRED• � If Council desires to unplement the recommendation they should pass a motion authorizing staff to begin the selection process for a new Street Department employee utilizing the finalists selected in December 1991. ��, _ .., � � _ � .,,. ,.Z�T: ' -� - �,: . i. .- -: - � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 2, 1992 T0: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistaj��J \ T j\� SUBJECT: CASE N0. 92-08: Raak - Subdivision DISCIISSION Mr. John Raak, of 724 Wentworth Avenue, appeared before the March 24th Planning Commission to discuss a proposed simple lot split that would enlarge Mr. Raak's existing, conforming lot by twenty-five feet (25') in width. Please see attached Planner's Report. At the meeting, the Commissioners expressed no concern about this lot split. The existing right-of-way is sixty feet (60') wide. The County's standard, minimum right-of-way is sixty-six feet (66') wide and the applicant will be required to dedicate an additional three feet (3'). Any approval should be conditioned on this dedication of right-of-way. RLCONIl�ZENDATION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council approve the requested lot split conditioned on the dedication of an additional three feet (3') of right-of-way and that Council waive the subdivision fee minus City costs to the process. ACTION REQIIIRED If City Council desires to implement the Planning Commission's recommendation, they should pass a motion approving Resolution No. 92- , A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE R.AAK LOT DIVISION AT 724 WENTWORTH AVENUE. KLB:kkb c - CITY OF D�NDOTA HEIGHTS DAROTA COUNTY, MINN�SOTA RESOLIITION NO. 92- A RESOL'OTION APPROVING TH}3 RP,�R LOT DIVISION AT 724 WENTDaORTH AVENIIE WHEREAS, Mr. Fred Raak and Mr. John Raak, owners of two parcels, said parcels composing the east 250.00 feet of the west 300.00 feet of Lot 37, Auditor's Subdivision No. 3 Mendota have requested from the City to divide these two parcels into two equal 125.00 foot lots; and WHEREAS, Parcel A is the e�st 150.00 feet of the west 300.00 =. feet of Lot 37, Auditor's Subdivision No. 3 Mendota; and DPSEREAS, Parcel B is the east 100.00 feet of Lot 37, Auditor's Subdivision No. 3 Mendota; and �PHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said lot division and finds the same to be in order. � N0� THEREFORE, IT IS BEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota that the lot division submitted at this meeting be and the same is hereby approved with the following condition: That the applicant dedicate an additional three feet (3') along Wentworth Avenue for the purpose of County right-of=way. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 7th day of April, 1992. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk � • � � ? PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: Background: � Cc)titilJLl'I�C; PL:1ti;�C•I:ti LA11)Sc::;l'r :�1:i:liiTf_C:"i i .il)(1 PII:S7' AVG\UE• IdQ1:Tl1 SUIT� 21t1 t•11\;�[.:�PQLIS, \t� �•i1(11 r,i.' ; i°� , ;11;1 24 Maz�ch 1992 92-08 John F. Raak 728 West Wentworth Subdivision approval, lot split The Raak's own two platted lots at 728 Wentworth. Both lots meet the minimum requirements of the Ordinance in terms of lot size and lot width There is curc�nfly a home on the eastem-most lot, which is occupied by Mr. Raak's father. This home meets all of �e setback requi�ments. Apparently at one time there was a single house that siraddled botr� lots. The foundations of this home sCill exist and their location is indicated on the site plan that shows the existing condition. The Applicant pcnposes to add 25 feet from the larger eastem lot to the western lot for the purpose of creating two lots of equal dimension The new lot is to have a single-family home built on it and is to be owned by Mr. Raak's son. The new lots will both exceed the minimum lot requirements and, therefore, the pmcedure for a simple lot split can be utilized. This pincedure allows the City to exempt the subdivider from complying with any inappropriate requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. In the past the City has sometimes waived the fees and eliminated the public hearing requirement if the Applicant has pinvidedl the signatums of the adjacent property owners. All of the adjacent neighbors have signed Mr. Raak's consent form. The proposed lot split would not alter the character of the immediate neighbofiood. Many of the lots on the south side of Wentworth Avenue in this area are of a similar dimension and configuration as the pivposed lots. The adjacent properiy to the west is perhaps the narnowest lot in the area at 50 fee� However, the existing home on this pnoperty meets the side yard setback on the side of the properiy abutiing the subject site. Acconiing to the ApplicanYs site plans, there is a screen house and a landscape stiucture that infringe on the western side of the subject property. The City should require some assurance that the adjacent property owner is not making any claim to the area of infringement before granting the requested lot split Adding land to the westem lot, as proposed, will leave room for ample side yard setbacks on both lots. This reduces the concem with �spect to the infringement of the stiuctures on the adjacent lot Our principal concem with respect to this request is the compatibility of the proposed house with the surnounding neighborhood. We have not seen any plans or drawings indicating the appearance of the proposed house. This structure should be designed to be compatible with the adjacent homes in the area if possible. The ApplicanYs letxer indicates that steel siding and brick are to be used on the exterior of the structure. However, this tells us nothing regarding the design of the home. It is impossible to �--�c�c,��..w�-e� / ��� �w � �� "� �-5 � -� John Raak, Case No. 92-08 Page 2 camment an whether �te prapased stcucture is campatible with the surrounding neighbarhaad without more information regarding the house itself. In additian, the subject property is located in an area that is experiencing transitian. Many of the adjacent homes are modest, older structures. However, there are several new homes on this block and these are generally larger relatively expensive struci�u�es. In addition, the Evergreen Knolls subdivision abuts the south side of the lots along ttus block. This sizbdivisian is new and contains expensiva hames. These factors camplicate the iss�e of deternnining what is compatible in this area since the c�r is mixed and the trend, as evidenced by the newer constmction, is toward larger mo� expensive hames. The subject properiy is also relatively visible within the cammunity since it is located diredly across the sireet from a city park (Wentwordi Park) antl is iocated on a major east west colledar sireet For t��ese reasans the design and character of the house that is to be built an the vacant Iot should be carefully considered. Curnentiy, the width af �� right-af-way for Wentworth Avenue is 60 feet Wentwarth Avenue is county � mad and the CounLy has requested an additionai th�e feet of right-of-way on either side the street whe� other lai splits and subdivisions have been pnocessed. The Aapplicant should be ri�ired ta dedicate this additianai three %et of right-of-way at this time. Action: Consider waiving the public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council on the requested iot split� f ! '''' � � �� � F=w� ��y� u'cs:?� ,,� ad►' �s- ��f,p��ss���. o� �� . � �,� �::a�:r � i ,�` � �' �r �'' � o . � �, s��! S �t���.•. �, �� o.�.�►:�,,''(� �►�o�e► ��� �� R ����.o. ',�' � �=���� � s�o�ao'�'�i��j,�► �►q�'a, � �'�'� � ' .�� ! Qi�.':a� ��'��..��a:s�` dQQO ■ � � � �ij:b.4. �...�_.. s . t . .rr�. �'"'�� ���� � �'!!' �� � � �--- ,._ `� � , � ; �� eee °��►��'��► �� :� i��.o_ _ ���,�..� �o,. o��,�,ar�,"�.�w d'�`► �.�# ���e�ed �� i� e r ♦ _ a �o`vo : �'P,��..�,4�d�±ac�iao� .`''� �'.��a�c , f ,�;� e '°'o'° °b.a`O °� =r�aaa��a�e��� _ � oTvo �.,,�,0 �� i� or,� o O�00 0000 �aot < �►� ���R�o �,a op �s4 0�� ooQO -`-� . ; �1� :.���dr Q�►�.c► �,��. e:��� ,� � +��,, C,,..,,.� � .�,�.��. � �"�� 0�1�'1 ,4„��d►� =, T�o . [�S:Ti:��' =� � �QQ��Q '� '��ii �/i0 � y��� �p�� � :.� " ,�■:. ,,�QOO�,.�,p .. �� ip - 00 � �. ��:� . �v , �. � �.-..� •t w ,� i � �� � f `�.� � i �: � � � • � � � iQD �} —'----^�'i�►' t.i.��� i•��--�—.az a�nt ��. ��� � -� � � : �` �. � ���� \ i 6>�► `� � q ,q ,,aQr �i � �� � � ' ���So . o �'' '�aHO/ - ���� - •-•` ' �. � 1 , �i � ;� �� � �~°"�►��W► � ' • • � -i �i, � a s 'I�1Q I �:�i'� � � ! ! � I��,��/i�'� �� � • I � � p00 � p �' --�r--�. ,�z� � ' o p�ao o� Ovo�i' �� ��� � ! � F� y�10oD ,��`� ; '4�oitP�l��''4�` o ii .� �p �i �...� Qa �'I :��„�, ,, e:�0:,so-�,�► eee � r►. ♦ !o� �ver�:cs,p�'4 �� "` � �0��'-4'°� �. �� O �O �.T�:,. �..►....ir� �.�.�,.. . ; � ,�t► 1,,► oQ�ii���v ��". -��. .:.,,,...�.: , ���!� a�A�lO � �. o��.dee��e� _ ___ __ - !�' � � •� - y�s ��' ��.-- �.00a �-�:�ii� ��OOQOvo. � - � y� �!' �� � � �a � ... ' - ��° ��s�!!lsse!!e �� �,,,� �'s`�� �.��Rvr�.ra�.�a � , � � � .i+ � � � ��`.. O�Q�Q00 ��� �. ,�E�� '� :a . ,,...:�.. • ��I��l�=.�'. ;; '� sii �►�►,� � �M+� � y� �ry u` �� t,IG r x�i�• �j �7 *�1 I' �� M'� �� ; �, �� �:•�'� '� �� ����� .�`` �«� �=isr,�rra��r = � ���►�0 ' �� � _ .� ��� �`�.. ,■■. aE."��iQ1 � � . ,,�, �� e� ��•,�'+ ������� ,���� f ''-���, r.a t �i�e��.ei� �� � E� � ^� � r .✓a�,.�e.. a � � ���4O�tfv �y��'►.*`y � ��r j�'�„�k � �� ,� . �7�. , Q � �:�����,, ■����� ����� � �°`` •� ��.� �'���l�xr���l� 1.� ��A :�'��0� w�`"iw_ '-� n,,, •n.r«�� � O m �'VJ/AI/Lt`� 'iu/��.. • . � �I� �i .S "�c � � Z .3 .� .s � � i7. � o �. � / L 914, a P o `as , _ . ,<, � ° h � � .� .r . % ` L ��\ h �s� J �`;� C 1 7 i� • � 1Z /i /0 9 8 7 � 7 � J `� � � LQ �»0 �0 m N � � �� �/� • 3� ` S ��` r T � � O �� � o q �� � �, ''P � S � 3 � � �4 fJ � � � •S � /J � x r+ � Q- � rs J N.ss°ie'z2"e. iso. z .1 V �z w 1�� � N� y $a 2 � " H m � no , e� �d 7T Z ��i. d � a � /� Z t�e�sNe2S"� e. a� � Z �• � / Ouv o . I�B0.00 w i3 r�a �l Ij nn� � I� � J E 97 ,z1 'Y o A r CC , C $�� 2 ,�01 A o a F �o 9 /0 ty ioe ��, ` ` N.89R8� 2S'E. � a n \ 18Q00 � n' 8 h 9� � "' i,� � /0 9�b 3�j� aa d 7 c ga q I � �Q,p �� M.8�18'ZiE. � 7 � /OS'� �' i• 180.00 :.t0 S7 57 N p2 p � T � o r B 4. � S7o / Z/�.S /3Z /32 • Ze�.s CONDOf INlUI NC � � 9 � �� � � •i-nice G: Schinid� � � 1 � � � L o f 33 '���� � c i r�E-� �/ /G� � / /32 \ ,�2 il.(A d • 8?s �qc. Laf 3� � az .� • . . . Y1l�AGE OF � ' . . .. • • '' C N \ iG4� iJ iL i; /i t� o � d . O ME�/DoTI� HE� T5 � �.L f,9 0 � SUBJEC PROPERTY �� � (�.,X NORTH t�`r�� r�, ,- .� Z, ZZ vi Zo 5, 9 N So Z ALE 1" 200' � 2.• 7� 53 -r qv�v�e-r-t�— - - �q. �- � - - - - — z3G.7¢ I�d77 � :-�' ` ;.'_va�3`�ek<�:;;. � i.. -�•. � ifi ;�^�:i�s,� a�:z:f Ji-wi� � ♦ �'�:: >�_. �; ;�.� i�.�:�. ��. �' � .v1• J�r..�y %3 �.� .- "' ,.; r: `S • Ql � ��`�'� , °`�;'�«."�'`��"�'.'�'�` � ♦ Sch..�nz � C � ..�,' '*;� � . .x��:�'��-k<�.� � � � c/a�,E �/ < 's`n�'a ;�•.�`�`�;:�<; j ✓on� �, +�;� ,;a,��• o�} i � �4 L of 3J a z Ac. " � � " °Q � l �Y � J �C�. � � � � � 9 �G194-H z6t9 ' � � � l, �: ° ' , ��� u �! Q! � °� � � ^ � � e v Q �Q\� �: � ; o� Q b v � ; L " ;'`"�..._a�`;�'. � �d 3 - - : U ` h�, � N e J��° F `.�' :���:� F h '� h �� e m o•-B ,q. coiiifo� � ��, o C n, a� t� � y �; '' .��` �� r�o ��, � bl ��, ti, o sz �- N 1.. : � � � . � �����. ,:���: � � �"�_A � � ` � ,� � �.k�:::��: t,��� �.� . � � o h p �, � , I 0 : Q � � � � � . .,., �` �;: €'�!,� x ,;� �' \ � � a � J p, A. 8 G. � ��r�Rc. u� :- � � �� �:�, �� � ��; � � L � '���;�:�ii1 ';<������� Q �`i Scha�.E ,... ; N B9"27's0� E 776 8Z •- - • �' 1 ._: ��� �� \.��� EV RG EEN KNO ��. Z.�� A`. . 4� � �" . OU OT A 3 � � 6 �- 6u1r�arc C 8���.Ema� 6►�-�� �• �"��. 2:, E ^.:7 D N� �Fti C� E: f. i � o �J� ' = N6lZYtQ�E �GL�.O�� ' Q 12 . 1 K C escz �. �co �u: _., izi.oc ��c o. � �'� �'• � C � � SEE W CORO PIAi fOP DETAIL • \ • (� � 7 �,H KLAO:SaFiRST .�'vADt7:Ti0N � I � � I j \ / 1� ` � � Q ��' ' [` � � • � 3 N 4 �. .! ` � � ^ _ •. _ �. 3 0 � � � 2 ` ,� ti � 6 � ^ �7 . �„7 i,�� �G� 6"v :"v9 45 �/ � . H t9•29'Sd'E ♦s0 . � • -y `�� � SU �oh, S ' \� " � e• . �!: I S T 1 �\` 3 �, �z�� � r A�� � � 9 2�, A D I T O N ouT� cr e _nd' � s 4 � _ . .. ' � y'�' RuNa�o T 0.......- J � � '� ' �- -�2 � It3l' O� .,�,1 „� ,1''«.endota %�eights ,�� . TO; FROM: SIGNATIIRES OF CONSENT FOR V���'-REOUEST c.�rs ct+ The Planning Commission, City of Men�ota Heights Property owners of � 2..-t-{ {�Gcn.� a rT ��n -`.� a 4� �n t�1 c. �:k. %�.� � e�Tu� � t� i� , ��� � �: �c-za c�s�� t�of 5�t�.-�C — -�..e. eAs-E' roa .oa .�';�f �,e. +.�.�f 1 S`a.c3o �c.u..-k � �' t..n -f- � % o-F` �v � c {� r `,� �- . a�.c-r�o rc9. �'���c'i ts�. e�.�rcQo.c�-� p t,� -�(r.�-r-�o� We the undersigned have reviewed . the - plans for � a�:,.�.- �"' � ��"�` � � � :.�and•understand the terms and � conditions of t3ie requested �' � L.o� �q t�i'� '�+o • 0.G �. O wt a� Np-+N 'S t (.,Q� '�,�^�` t t I�in�+�. . We have no objecta.ans•to thi request an do hereby give aur. - written consent and cansent.to waiver af public hearing. Si.ncerely, (Please Print� F.'���itixil;�� ADDRESS (INCL. IATj � i : a' +� ....�� • • .P.c.. t � . , .. . . ...:.r .1 ��R��� % ' ' �..._. . � ,. . . � ����� � r � � �� � � /I' �� r /•' �.t,( / � 1 � � � j� ! �f..r! . . . . .._. ..1..._ � • � • April 2, 1992 Mr. John F. Raak 622 Ohio Street St. Paul, NII�T 55107 Dear Mr. Raak: C ity o� 1Viendota Heights Your application for a Subdivision will be considered by the City ,: Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday. April 7, 1992. The Council meeting starts at 8:00 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in �he Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting in order that your application will receive Council consideration . The Planning Coa�issioa recommended 7-0 that the City Couacil approve the requeated lot split coaditioaed on the dedication of an additional three feet (3') of right-of-way and that Couacil waive the subdivisioa fee minus City costs to the process. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ��� � Revin Batchelder �Administrative Assistant RLB:kkb Enclosures: City Council Agenda Staff Memo to City Council 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1VIN • 55118 452 • 1850 .• . , • y. _ .. . _ � • Clt o�r � .,,.. . 1V'ie�ndota I-�eight:� March 20, 1992 Mr. John F. Raak 622 Ohio Street . St. Paul, N�T 551p7 Dear Mr. Raak: Your application for a Subdivisian wi.11 be considered by the . P].anning Comma.ssion at their nex� regularly scheduled meeting, which wi21 be helci on Tuesday, March 24. The Planning Commission meeting star�a at 7:30 o'ciock P.M., here at the City Hall zn the Council Chambers. Yau, or a representative should pYan an attendir�g the meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission considera�Gion. � Y � If you�have any questions, pl.ease feel .free to contact me. � Sincerely, � �� ���� Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assis�ant � Enclosures: Planning Commissian Agenda Planner's Report 1101 Vietaria Curve � 1Viendota Heights,lVlN • 55118 452 • 1850 3.2 Ma1t Liquor License (Off-Sale) to be approved by Council Apri17, 1992 Tom Thumb Food Mazkets � LIST OF CONTR�CTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL � � � April 7, 1992 � Asphalt License Ace Blacktop, Inc. Drywall License Dvorak Drywall Company, Inc. Masonry Licenses BNK Masonry, Inc. Leibel Construction, Inc. Gas Piping Licenses Brian's Htg. & A/C McQuillan Bros. Plumbing & Htg. Co. Heating & Air Conditioning License Brian's Htg. & A/C General Cont. Licenses Able Fence, Inc. (Fence Install.) Jannings Accoustics, Inc. New Age Designs Home Builders (Residential) s Apr11 7, 199Y TO: Heyor and City CounctZ CLIIHS LZST SUMMRRYs To[al Clalms Slgniftcant Cleims Ned Center M�CC UnusuaZ CZatmi Manual chaeka: Recycle payments Grossman Chev S 105,339 April premtum 8�984 Sewer : Sac 63,673 9,568 P. W. truck 12,750 / _ _.�. ._. � . 0 uept 10-Adm napo sa-xoeas � 15-Engr BO-Ut111Ctes 70-Polica 70 -.Parks � Aor 299� dl7l9Z CI�isns List 30-F3re 080-F2annSng i�aae i 7hu kiQ; RM Citv of M�nOuta Meiqhts 40-GEO 85-RacyaZtng BO-.lnimal control 7emo Check Nuni6er 1 Terna. Check Nurnber^ Vendor Name Accaunt Cade I Earl F Rndersan & Assoc fli-4420-050-52+ 1 Totals 'femp Check Number 1 Terno Check Nurnber 2 2 RTRT 01-4210-0a0-Sb � G?T&F sdi-423td-67a-70 2 41T8T 15-421N-060-fi+d 2 pTdT 01-4210-0�G1^70 $ Tatals Temo Ctreck Number 2 Terno Check Number 3 3 Rlbi»san 05-k305-FQ5-15 3 fiibinson N1-43N0-060-80 3 qlbinson SS-4305-060-6N 9 ` Tot�ls Temq Check Number 3 7emo Check Nurnber 4 4 Rraerican Business Forms SS^N305-+D60-60 4 • Totals Temo Check NumCer 4 Temo Cbeck Number u u Barefopt C,rass 01-N335-315-3N 5 Totals Temq Check Number 5 Temo Check Number 6 6 battery & Tire Warehause @1-4330-4kQ^-20 6 Batter,V & Tire Warehause 01-4330-440-20 6 Hattery & Tire Warehouse 01-4334-440-2W 6 Haitery & Tire Warehause 05-4330-440-15 6 Battery 8 Tira Warehouse NI-G330-490^50 6 Hattery & Tire Warehause 01-4330-490^50 36 To�als Temp Check Number 6 7etno Check Number 7 � r Comments sians Ror svc flcr svc Ror svc Aor svc solvs Re aeriaY nnatas solvs ke Ferial ohatos solvs Re aerial onqtos biilina solys 1992 lawn care oart� narts oarts oarts oarts oarb� Finaunt 25f.i3 263.13 10. 53 10. ."'.r3 10. .�c"' 14.62 46. ^c+D 72. 86 37.63 75. 28 185.79 803.26 803. �6 515.80 516.80 27. 6 i 13. 56 15.75 40.09 11.88 12.30 12i.i7 e � Ror 1342 Clairns �ist Thu 3:05 PM City of Mendota Heiohts 7erno Check Number 7 Temo. Check Number Vendor Name Rccount Cndct 7 Terrv Bi�rn 4�1-4475-070-70 � Tatals Terno Check Nurnber 7 Terno Cfieck Nurnber 8 B Board of Water Cornrniesioners 01-4425-315-30 $ Boar6 c+f Water Comrnir>sioners 01^4G�5-310-50 d Board of Water Commissianers 08-NG25-04@-0� 2N Totals Terno Check Nurnber 8 Terno Check Nurnber J 9 Jahn 9oland @3-441fl-05@-50 9 Totals Temu Check Nurnber 9 7ema Check Nurnber 10 10 Laurence Bri4ger 01-4G20-0�q-20 10 Totais Terrtp Check Nurnber 36 Terno Check Number li SI Bizrrsart 03-46@0-020-2Q 11 Bizmart 01-43@0-0Z0-G0 22 � Tatels Terna Check Num6er fF Temo Check Number 12 i2 Caflito2 Suonlv � 08-4335-000-II�+ 1� Totals Temo Check Number 12 Temo Check Number I3 13 City Motor Supply 01^4330-440-2�n 13 City Motor Supoly 01-4330-490-74 i3 City Motor 3upply IS-4330-490-fi0 13 City Mator Supply 01-4330-460-30 13 City Mator Supply 01-4330-490-70 --.-._.... .._....--- i--� - - , �► Comments tni reirab Feb &vc Feb svc Feb svc 32 alcthino allow tuition reirnG como eq solvs oart� oarts oarts oartc oartc Qart� 1 Paoe 2 Rrnour�k � 60. N6 •-y 60.48 73. 26 20. 33 26. 63 � 120.12 � i70. 00 �... 170.QQ ���. :.1 196. 2@ 195. $W ' 1 398.44 r� 14.13 413.Q� , 14. 92 19. 92 145. 56 225. 86 � 32. 85 11.65 60.09 2 Ror 3992 Clairns List Thu 1:05 RM Citv of Mendota Heiohts Terno Check Nurnber 13 Terno. Check Nurnber Vendor Narne qccount Code 13 Citv Motur Suoolv @1-4332-440-20 �a Totals Terno Check Nurnher 13 Terno Check Nurnber 14 14 City of W St Paul 15-433@-490-60 14 Totala Terno Check Nurnber 14 Temo Check Number 15 15 Marae Cogoer OS-44Q0-020-20 15 Tutals Terno Check Nurnber 15 Terno Check Nurnber 16 16 Collins Electrical Const 01-4330-215-7N ' 16 Collins Electrical Const 01-4211-3N0-50 32 Totals Terno Check Number 36 Terno Check Nurnber 17 17 Cooy Duclicatino Products 01-4305-050-50 37 Totals Terno Check Nurnber 17 Ternp Check Number 18 18 Corrioan Electric @1-4211-420-50 iB Totals Temo Check Nurnbar 18 Temo Check Numher 19 19 Crawford Door 01-1145 19 Totals Terne Check Nurnber 19 - Terno Check Number 20 20 Creative Colorz 01-4330-490-7@ �0 ' Cornment s oarts rntcn trno rnrs rnrs cooies rors door rors D. R. SOSVS paoe 3 Rmaunt 214.38 691.40 646.0@ 646. 00 4@.@0 40.@0 641.G0 227. 50 868.70 8. 65 8. 65 78.80 78.80 764. 50 764.50 279.00 279.00 .. .. _ . �, .. _ ti .._'_"'"' _ _'L_ � 4 G Aor 1992 Thu 1:05 PM Terno Check Number 20 Terno. Check Nurnber Vendor Narne Totals Terno Check Nurnber Terno Check Nurnber 21 21 Dakota Plba & Hto 21 Dakota Plbo 8 Hto 21 Dakota Plbo & Hto ' 63 Totals Terno Check Nurnber Temo Check Nurnber 22 22 James Danielson 22 Total� Terno Check Nurnber Temo Check Nurnber G3 23 Dahle Bros 23 Dahle Hras 23 Dahle Bros 23 Dahle Bros 92 Totals Terno Check Nurnber Terno Check Num6er 24 24 Dennis Delrnont 24 Dennis Delmonti 4B Totals Terno Check Number Terno Check Nurnber 25 25 Discorn of Mn Inc 25 Discorn of Mn Inc 25 Discorn of Mn Inc 75 Totals Temo Check Nurnber Terno Check Nurnber 26 26 Klayton Eckles E6 Totals Temo Check Number Clai�ns List City of Mendota Heiohts Rccount Code 20 01-4335-�10-56 01-4335-310-70 I5-4335-310-60 21 TS-4415-105-15 01-3250 @1-3315 03-3302 15-3320 23 01-4435-020-2N 01-4410-020-20 24 01-4330-440-20 01-4330-450-30 01-4330-450-30 25 05-4415-105-35 26 Comments reol drko fountain reol drkn fauntair� reol drka fountain Ror atlow rfd 80X oerrn fee 770B rfd wac 7708 rfd sac 7708 fior allow exo reirnb rcrs rnrs ros mi reirnb Y ' � Paoe 4 Rrnount 205.35 2Q5.35 205.30 616.@@ 120.00 120.00 1.033.55 70. 45 200. 00 700.00 2.004.00 120.00 82.50 202.50 89.30 67.67 31. 50 188.47 37.80 37.00 m 2 flar 1498 C2aims l.ist Thu 1:05 aM Citv of Mendata Heiahts Terno Check Number 27 Temp. Check Number Vendor Narne qcaount Cade 87 Economics Press Snc 03-4402-0�0-20 27 Totals 7erno Check Nurnber 27 Temo Check Nurnber 28 26 Fielstone Cabinetry inc 01-4i31-020-20 28 Totals Temn Check Number 2B 7erno Check Nurnber 29 89 Firestane Stares 21^k3?,0-490-50 29 Firestane 5tares 01-A330-490-50 5$ Totals Temo Check Numher 29 7emo Check Nurnber 30 ' 30 First Tnterstate Bank TrusC�e 01-207f 30 First Interstate Bank Trustee 01-4132-020-2@ 30 First IntersCate Bank TrusCee 01-kY32-0u@-�0 .a0 First Tnterstate Bank Trustee IDt-4132-0?0-7@ 30 First Interatate Hank 7rustea 15-4132-@60-b0 150 Totals Terno C}�eck Nurnber 30 Temo Check Nurn6er 31 31 John M Frantes Sons Ql-Q335-310-50 3i Totals Temp Check Number 31 Temo Check Nnm4er 32 3Z Grouo Health inc 05-pi31-105-15 3� Tatals Temp Check Nurnber 3z 7emo Check Number 33 33 I C M A R 7 0t-2672 33 I C M R R 7 01-4134-11@-10 33 I C M R R T 01-2072 Comments oubl Aor Re Garlock tires tires fkor orem Gior nrem Aor prern Aor orem Ror prera svc call qor Re Kullander 3t6 payrail 3/6 payroll 3/c�0 oayroll r t. Pane 5 Rmount 2fd. 9(D 2e. sm 78.@@ 78. 00 199. 3.�. 553. 5Q7 752. 82 196. 76 69.A6 21.09 25.5? 4.N2 317.29 69. 0@ 59.00 95.00 95.00 348. H8 94.98 348.48 � � il4r..t..• 2 Aor 3942 Ciaims List Thu 1:05 GM Ci�v vf Mendota Noiohts 7emo Check Number 33 Terev. Check Number Vendor Narne 4lecaunt Code s3 I C M fi R S 01-4i34-110-I£L� 132 Totals Temo Check Number 33 Te�ao Check Nurnber 34 ^s4 Identi Kit co 01-H400-Q20-2@ 34 Totels Temo Cheek Num6er 34 Temo Check Number 35 35 Inver Grave Fard 15-4305'-�6@-6s 33 Tatals Temo Cheak Num6er s8 7emo Check Number 36 3Ca Intaxitneters 01-43f65-@2A-�N 36 Tatals Ternn Check Nurnber 36 Terao Check Number 37 37 Paul Kaiser 01-p268-150-30 37 Totals Terno Check Nurnber 37 7erno Check Number 3B 38 Xar Aroducts 01-4305-050-Sfl 36 Kar Praducts 01-4305-070-70 39 Kar Products 15-N305-060-60 3$ Kar Products 01-430�-@30-30 38 Kar Praducts 01-4305-020-Z0 3B Kar Products 01-H305-050-50 229 3otala Temp Check Number 38 Temo Check Number 39 3'3 Kat Keys @i-4305-070-?0 39 Kat Keys 01-A305-@70-70 78 Totais Temp Check lVamber 39 ___._..._..'-._...._"---�'-_ --_._..._..._._ .. �_.. _ . t Cornmerhs 3l'c0 oavrall atrlv rent solvs soiys Mar �vc SOSVC 60iUi soly� splys sviys solys salys solys Faoe 6 Rrnount 94. 98 886.92 102.20 3 4+2. 00 3@. Q0 3D. 00 �42. 2�0 342.00 1.636.20 i. 636. 20 Si3.40 113. 40 i 13. 40 113. 4?1 1i3.4Qt 64. 11 631.ik 10.96 39.32 50. 28 V ) :? r ' i: I � ' � Aor 3952 Thu i:@5 RM 7emo Check Nurnder 4@ Terno. Cheek Number Vendar Name 44 Knutson ftaGbish Service 40 Totals Tema Check Nurnber Terno Check Nuraber 41 41 Thornas Knuth 41 ihurnas Knuth B:: Totals Terno Check Nurnber Temo Check Nutnber 42 42 L E L S 44 Tc�tals Temq Check Nurnber Terno Check Nurnber 43 • 43 leaoue of Mn Cities 43 Leaoue of Mn Cities 8& Totais Terno Check Number 7emp Check Number 44 44 life ll S A 4kLifeUSR 4k Life U 8 R 44 Life ll 5 R 176 Totals Terno Check Numher Temo Chec3e lVumber 45 49 M Thomas Lawell 4S Totals Temo Check Number 7emo Check Number 46 4b Leef Bros 46 l.eef 6ros 46 Leef 6ros 138 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber .._....__ z. Claicn� �'xst Citv of Mendota Heiohts Rccount Cude 08-4338-0Qt0-22! 4@ 05-4k15-Sa5-i5 05-Ak15-105-15 41 01-^c075 42 61-;=074 01-4i31-020-�0 43 +Bi-2@?4 01^q131-050^50 05-4131-108^15 S5-k13i-060-60 44 01-4415-110-10 49 si-k335-310-50 01-4335-310-70 15-4335-310-60 46 Comments Mar svc rni reirnb Ror aiiow Ror dues Ror orem Ror orern Ror orern Ror orem Aor prem Ror prem Ror allow Mar svc Mar Rvc Mar cvc qrnount 60. 0Ca 60.06 45.48 20. PtW 56.48 �75. N0 275. 00 477.Si 813.2� 1.250.76 48.33 77.66 2@2. 95 201.6? 530.63 175.00 179. fl0 13.35 13. iS , , 13.15 34.48 .. .. .. __ _ . ..__......_._.__ . f . : 2 Hor 1992 Clairns List Thu 1:05 PM Citv of Mer�dota Heiohts Temo Check Nurnber 47 Temo. Check Number Vendor Narne Rccount Code 47 Lincoln Penefit 01-2074 47 Lincoln Benefit 4�1-4131-02N-20 47 Lincoin Benefit Q1-4131-1IQ-1Q 141 Totals Terno Check Nurnber 47 Terno Check Nurnber 48 48 Lvnn Feavev 01-4305-020-20 p8 Totals Terno Check Nurnber 48 Terno Check Nurnber 49 A9 M R Sion Ca Inc 01-442C�-050-50 49 Totals Terno Check Nurnber 49 Temo Check Nurnber 50 50 Med Centers H P 01-2074 50 Med Centers H P 01-4131-110-10 50 Med Centers H P 01-4131-020-2Q 50 Med Centers H P 01-4131-040-40 50 Med Centers H R 01-4131-050-50 50 Med Centers H P 01-4131-070-70 50 Med Centers H P 05-4131-105-15 50 Med Centers H P 08-4110-000-00 .�i0 Med Centers H P IS-4331-060-60 45@ Totals Terno Check Nurnber 50 Temo Check Number 51 51 Minn Bearing Co � 01-4330-490-52 51 Tobals Temo Check Nurnber 53 Temo Check Number 52 52 Metro 5ales 01-4300-Q20-20 52 Totals Terne Check Nurnber 52 � Temo Check Number 53 53 MicrocofC Uodate � 01-4301-110-10 r Comments Ror orern Ror svc Ror orern 501V5 sions Ror orern Ror orern Ror orern 4ior orern Ror orern 4ior orem Rnr orern Ror orern Ror orem oarts solys software � .. Paoe 8 Rmount 40.00 1 B2. 0Q 93.00 315.00 43.90 43.90 126.81 126.81 2.103.90 1. 392. 60 3. 096. 90 ssa.mo 1.08N.55 238.00 696.30 137.50 312.NSer 8.983.70 146.09 146.09 15.0@ 15. 00 128.44 5 • .:;,' .. i�'?i ; G%i:• , � ,�s :;,i rr�; ,. �';' 2 Ror 1992 Clairns List Thu 1:@5 GM Citv of Mendota Heiohts Terno Check Nurnber 53 Temo. Check Nurn6er Ver�dor Narne pccount Cude 53 Totals Terno Check Nurn6er 53 Temo Check Nurnber ,�i4 54 Metro Waste Coritrol 15-4448-260-6d 54 Metro Waste Control 35-3615 54 Metro Waste Control 15-4449-@60-60 54 Metr� Waste Control 17-3575 216 Totals Terno Check Nurnber 54 Terno Check Nurnber 55 55 Midwest Ghuto Svc 01-4305-Q2Q-247 .�,5 Totals Terno Check Nurnber 55 Terno Check Number 56 .�i6 Minn Cellular Tele Co 21-4200-61N-20 56 Minn Cellular Tele Co 01-4200-610 �0 56 Minn Cellular Tele Co 01-4�Q0-610-3N 56 Minn Cellular Tele Co 01-4200-610 �0 56 Minn Cellular Tele Co 01-4200-61@-30 56 Minn Cellular Tele Co 01-4200-610-10 336 Totals Ternc Check Nurnber 56 Ternn Check Number 57 57 Minn Dent of Revenue 01-4320-050-50 J% Totals Temo Check Nurnber 57 Terno Check Nurnber 5B 58 Minn Pollution Control fiocy @1-4330-440-20 SB Totals Terno Check Nurnber 58 Terno Check Nurnber 59 53 Minn Mutual Life Ins @1-2072 Cornment s Mar sac cnps Mar sac chns Ror svc tior �vc Mar sve Mar svc Mar svc Mar svc Mar svc Mar svc Mar svc Mar fuel tax ernission test F D 3/20 oavroll Paoe 9 qrnount 12B. 44 20.3N0.00 203.00cr 46.322.06 �.756.08cr 63. 623. 00 57.89 57.89 9.95 9.95 19.90 13.94 9.95 9. 95 73. 64 46.00 46.00 32.00 32. 00 525.00 !B 0 2 Ror 1992 Claims List Raoe 1@ Thu 1:Q5 PM Citv c+f Menduta Heiohts Terno Check Number 59 Temo. Check Nurnber Vendor Name Account Code Cormnents Rmount 59 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-2074 qnr nrern 189.9� 59 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-4131-110-1c� Ror orem 1.70 59 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-4131-020 �0 Rnr orern 3.40 59 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-4131-070-70 Ror orern 3.40 59 Ptinn Mutual Life Ir�s 08-411@-000-00 Ror orem 1.70 �g4 725.12 Totals Terno Check Nurnber 59 Terno Check Nurnber 60 60 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01 �074 Ror orern 109.31 60 Minnesota Benefit 4issn OS-4131-110-10 Ror orem 151.86 60 Minr�esota Benefit Assn 05-4131-105-15 Ror orern 464_f08 60 Minnesota BeneFit Rssn 01-4131-020-::0 por orern 567.67 60 Minnesota Benefit Rssn 01-4131-05@-i@ fior orern 262.42 60 Minnesota Benefit Rssn 01-4131-070-70 por orern 372.68 60 Minnesota Benefit Rssn 15-4131-062-60 Ror orern 1�7.60 4[0 2. 055. 62 Tutals Terno Check Nurnber 60 Tetno Check Nurnber 61 63 Minnesota Tearnsters Loc 320 01-2075 Ror dues 227,00 61 227.00 Totals Temo Check Nurnber 61 Temo Check Nurnber 62 - � 6� Minnesota Toro Inc 01-4400-070-70 trno 270.00 62 Minnesota Toro Inc 01-4400-050-50 trno 135.00 IZ4 405. 00 Totals Terno Check Num6er 62 Temo Check Nurnber 63 63 Minnesota Conway 01-43@5-030-30 re/cho 27.00 63 27.N0 Totals Terno Check Nurnber 63 Temo Check Number 64 64 Minn State Retirement Systern 01-2072 3/2�d oayroll 35.N0 64 35.00 Tatals Temn Check Nurnber 64 Terno Check Nurn6er 65 _.., _ -� - ._-------- `-- . . _ _.. _. . .- --�_._._.. ��...._ . . . _. .--._'-----'-�--- ---• -- -- -- -" --' - — -"--'-- -.-�-•__ . . .. ... . ... . . _.._ t . ':� • . 2 Aar 1932 Clairns list 7hu 1:4�5 fiM City of Mendota Heiohts Terno Check Number 6w Terno. Check Nurnber Vendar Name Fccount Code 65 Murriciaals W Larscn Treas 01-4404-110-16 6u Totals 7emo Check Number 65 Temo Cheak Number 66 66 Natl Buair�ess Furniture 08-46N0-0041-2d 56 Natl 8usiness Furriiture 08-464�@-00@-@6 66 Nati Business Furnittme 08-4S00-Q�00-0t� 196 Total� Temo Check Nutaber 66 Temo Check Nurnber 67 6'7 Needels Eo Qi-4305-47Q+-76 67 Needela Co 01-4305-@30^34 6� Needelg Co 01-43f�5-050-50 201 Tatals Te�ao Check Number 67 Temo Check Number 6B 68 National 6uardia» 15-4330-440-60 68 Totals Terno Check Nurnber 6B Temo Check Num6er 69 69 National Traco Oil 01-12i0 69 Nationel Traca Di2 @1-121@ 69 Natiana2 Traca Oil 03-f210 207 Totala Temn Cheek Nurnber 69 Ternv Check Number '70 70 Oakcrest Kennels Q1-4221-8@0-90 7Q! Oakcrest Hermeis @2-k2�5-80fl-9@ 140 Totals Terno Check Nurnber 70 Temp Check Number ?i 71 Oxygen Service Co 01-4305-07@-7@ Comments 92 dues P D sn return FDea �olvc salvs solv� alarrn mtcn drurn oil tra»a FI Mar svc Mar svc solys Raae 11 Amo�mt S. 0k� 5. 00 849.65 348.60er 383.00 934.65 217.18 i33.$8 31. 39 380. 45 240.91 240. 91 20.00 169.95 179.85 369.80 330. 0PJ 28$.00 619.0@ 19. Ifd 2 Aor 199� Claims List Thu f:05 GM Citv oF Mendota Heiahts Temo Check Number 71 Terno. Check Nurnber Vendor Narne Rccaunt Code 71 Oxyaen Service Co @1-4305-050-50 71 Oxyaen Service Co 0B-4a35-0N0-00 213 Fotals Te�no Gheck Nnmber 71 7emo Check Nurnber 72 7L teonard Perron 0&-4335-0@Q�-0�D 72 Tatals Ternp Check Nurnber 72 Temo Check Nurnber 7's 73 Ruffridpe Jahnsor� Ea Co 01-A330-490-50 73 Totais Temo Check M1lumber 73 7emo Check Nurnher �4 74 Sextan Prte Inc 01-4�0N-02Q-20 7A Tatals Tema Check Nurnber 74 Temo Check Nurnber 75 7S L E Shauahnessy Jr @1-4.�.2@-33�-1¢� 75 L E 9hauohnes$y Jr 05-42c0-138-15 75 L E Shauohnessv Jr 15-42E0-13�'-60 7u L E Shauohnesav Jr 03-A220-132-Q0 7S L E Sheuohnessv 3r 21-G22¢�-132^N0 7S � E St�aunhnessv 3r 14-42�0-132-0@ 75 l. E Shaughnessy Jr 16-4220-132-9Q 525 Tata2s Terno Check Number 75 7emo Check Number �6 _ 76 5hie2ey Co 01-4422-N50-50 76 Totals Terno Check Nurnber 76 Tes�o Check Nu�nber ?? 77 Sirchie 01-4305-020-20 7? Totels Temo Cfieck Numher ' 77 Comments 562V5 act thur 3/1.S snowo2crwino solys solvs Mar 5vc Mar svc Mar svc Mar svc Mar svc Mar svc Mar svc cl 5 mix �olys s. Page 12 Arnount 25.7$ 13. 50 58.3$ 135.00 135. OJ0 124.55 124. 55 163. 4Cd Y61.40 1. 750. 10 278. iS 285. 00 160.3GJ 213. 7S 1.459.60 396. 35 4. 453. $8 114. 0? 119.N7 33. 96 33. 96 r. .: � w ...w.,a:.�.: �4�.. �';:. ;�. si 'i : �,:: ::,. 2 Ror 1992 Thu 1:05 PM Terno Check N�vnber 78 Temc. Check Nwn6er Vendor Narne 7B Snvder Druo 5tc,res 78 Snyder Druq Stores 7B Snyder Druo Stores 78 Snyder Drug Stores 312 Totals Terno Check Nurnber Temo Check Nurn6er 73 79 5treiehers 79 Totals Terno Check Numher Temo Check Nurnber 80 80 Sterlino Electric B0 Sterlina Electric 80 Sterlino Electric 80 Sterl3ng Electric 80 Sterling Electric 80 Sterling Electric 48@ Totals Terno Check Nurnber Terno Check Nurnber ' 81 81 3un Sales BI Sun Sales 81 Sun Salec 243 Totals Temo Check Nurnber Temo Check Number B2 8� Sun Newspaoers 82 Sun Newspapers B� Sun Newsoaoerc 246 Totals Teme Check Nurnber Temp Check Number B3 83 Terrninal Suooly Co 83 Totals Temo Check Nurnber Claims List Citv af Mendota Heiohts Rccount Cotle 01-4305-030-30 01-4305-03N-30 01-4305-03@-30 01-4325-@30-30 78 01-433@-44@-20 79 01-4305-NSN-S@ 01-4305-0Pi@-50 Q1-4335-310-5@ 01-4335-310-70 15-4335-310-60 15-4335-310-60 80 01-4305-050-50 01-4305-070-70 15-4305-060-60 BI 01-4240-0B0-B0 01-4240-080-B0 01-4240-640-12 B2 01-4305-070-70 83 Comrnents solvs SDIVS splvs solvs solvs solvs discuunt solys SD1V5 501V5 discount solys splys solye hro not Rnderson hro not Rndrews official test not solys Paoe 33 Rmount 3. 48 1.89 8. 29 4.48 IB. 14 49.4Q 49 40 16.I5 0.32cr 89.12 8B. 12 88.32 2.64cr 277.55 50.90 50.90 50.90 152.70 40.20 18.09 13. 40 71.69 30. 00 30. 00 •. 2 Ror 1992 Claims List Thu 1s05 PM City of Mer�dota Heioht� Temo Check Number B4 Ternn. Check Nwnber Vendor Narne pccount Code 84 Twin Citv 5aw Svc 01-4330-215-70 84 Totals Terno Check Number 84 Terno Check Nurnber BS 85 U S Wesi Cornmunicatic+ns @1-4210-110-10 BS U 5 West Cornrnunicatians N1-4210-020-20 BS U S West Cornrnunic�tions 01-4210-@40-4N 85 U 5 West Cornrnunications @5-423@-10�-15 BS U S West Comrnunications 1.�,-4210-060-6d 85 U S West Cornrnunications 01-4210-070-70 BS U S West Cornrnunications @3-4210-@.�i0-50 85 U S West Cornrnunications 01-4230-030-30 65 U S West Cornrnunications 01-4210-050-Sd 85 U S West Cornrnunications 01-4210-070-70 85 U S West Comrnunications 15-421N-060-60 B5 U S West Cornrnunicatiuns 09-4210-00N-00 1020 Totals Terno Check Num6er 85 Ternc Check Nurnber 86 86 United Way St �aul 01-2070 86 �_µ Totals Temn Check Nurnber 86 � Ternc Check Nurnber B7 B7 Uobeat Inc 01-2010 B7 Totals Temc Check NumCer B7 Temo Check Nurnber 88 B8 Weatern Life Ins 01-4132-N31-30 88 Totals Temo Check Nurnber 88 9650 Grand Total - - �_.- - --- -...----.__—. - �---'- - ... __. '_...._---'---•"'-.._..._. .�- - . s � Comrnent s rors Mar svc Mar svc Mar svc Mar savc Mar svc Mar svc Mar svc Mar svc Mar svc Mar svc Mar savc Mar svc Aor Contr recycle receotales Ror orem i _ ` �. :Y T= Raoe 14 L7rnount 131.95 331.55 308.25 �38.1@ 52.78 162.62 374.81 45.48 28.76 112.62 35.82 35.82 35. BI 4B.23 1.759.76 200.00 200.00 1. 003. 85 1.003.85 154.80 154.80 105r33B.75 0 d 4/2/92 MANUAL CXSCXS 13504 105.00 U of 11 Regs 13505 15.00 No Ster Chapter 3/19 mee[tng 13506 15.00 Covt Trng Cntr regr 53507 70.00 " " 53508 255.00 State Fire School ' 23509 1�014.50 BFI 91 recyclilg 23550 757.00 Knutson Rubbtsh 13511 6,578.00 Xendota 8etghts Rubbish ' 13517 369.00 Roadway Rubbish " 13513 750.00 Trtangle Servtce " 13514 '883.58 Abiweat.9ank. . 3/10 payroSZ deducttons 13515 3,954.63 State Capttol C.U• " 13516 730.95 Leonard xenitaz W. C. vages 13517 42.00 City oP Lakeville Xunicipala 135I8 425.00 Aakota County Bank 3/10 payml2 deductions - 13529 • 8,197.89 FERA 3/20 pnyroll 13570 '13.84 " " 13521 3,?79.34 Co�is+ioner of RSv 3/20 SIT 1352T 23,557.83 Delcota County 8ank 3/20 w/h 13573 41,890.15 Payrolla/c 3/20 net payro2l 13520 312.75 Dekota County Bank assmt ro11s 33525 73.90 Larry Brtdger ina adj 235T6 `585.'00 APWA regs 13527 14�750.00 Cros�en Chev P. W. ptckup 98�OY0.36 G.T. 703�359.11 , 0 . `-'i �.Y .. ..1_ �ora � m CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS March 31, 1992 T0: Mayor, City Council and City Administ�� FRONl�: John P. MaCzko Fire Chief SUBJECT: House Fire - 829 Hilltop At 9:59 A.M. on Friday, March 27th, a structure fire was reported to the West St. Paul Dispatcher at 829 Hilltop Road. The fire was reported as a house fire with flames through the roof, possible furnace problem. The first officers to arrive on the scene stated that there was heavy smoke. Our first first engine arrived on the scene at 10:04 and Captain Keith Stein immediately assumed command and did an excellent job in the control of this fire. Three people were home, sleeping, at the time the fire broke out but had escaped except for the family dog. The initial survey of the building showed that there was heavy flame involvement in the basement level of the home and the flames had already broke through the window and were proceeding up the wall of the outside of the home to the attic area. A quick attack was made through the rear of, the house and the interior fire was quickly knocked down, however the flames had been burning long enough that the attic area of the home was now involved. This area was a more difficult area to fight as it was a confined space fire, however, access was made through one of the ends of the home and the fire was extinguished and declared under control at 11:08 A.M. Extensive salvage and overhaul had to be accomplished to eliminate hot spots. The department cleared the station at 3:00 P.M. It should also be noted that the department did not fight this fire alone. Mutual Aid Departments responded from Inver Grove Heights and Eagan to assist in fighting this fire. Through our extensive networking capabilities with other department in the County, West St. Paul stood by to respond to any additional calls that we may have had in Mendota Heights. Crews from Apple Valley and Rosemont moved into the Eagan and Inver Grove Heights stations. As far as injuries are concerned, the three occupants of the home were sent to United Hospital and treated for smoke inhalation. One firefighter was treated for minor smoke inhalation. At this point we have not been able to determine whether the smoke detectors in the home were working or not. The occupants of the home said they never heard the smoke detectors sound and were awakened to the smell of smoke. Upon interviewing the owner of the home he gave us the following account of what happened when they notice a problem. He and his daughter woke up almost simultaneously to the smell of smoke. He proceeded to the back of the house from the bedroom to open the door to try and get some of the smoke out and attempted to call 911, however, the telephones were not working. He then attempted to get back down the hallway but the smoke was so thick that he could not get back to his daughter's room. He then went outside and came around to the side of his daughter's room where he found his daughter and a girlfriend had broken out a bedroom window and were climbing out the window. The two girls (early 20s) stated that the smoke was to heavy to go down the hallway so they resorted to the window. The smoke was to heavy to go down the hall and get out of the house. There was one victim who was not able to escape and that was the family�dog. The cause of the fire is being investigated by Fire Marshall Paul Kaiser and the State Fire Ma.rshal's office and is still under investigation. There was extensive smoke and heat damage to the home, along with structural dama.ges to two bathrooms, lower basement area, and roof area. Damage is estima.ted at approximately $80,000 (structure) and $50,000 (contents). cc: Paul Kaiser, Fire Marshal John Neska, Asst. Fire Chief Keith Stein, Captain �, � CITY OF MF.NDOTA HEIGHTS Apri12, 1992 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admi.nistrato FROM: James E. Danielson, Director of Public or SUB7ECT: Downtown Mendota Heights - Ri.ng Road Up te `• DISCUSSION• Council conducted a workshop in Januazy 1992 to discuss the Dodd RoadlTrunk Highway 110 intersection. Mr. Adeel Lari, Mn/DOT Right-of-Way Engineer, and Mr. Bob Brown, Mn/DOT Project Engineer, were present to discuss the outcome of a study requested by Mr. Ed Paster, owner of the Shopping Center. 1VIr. Paster had submitted a plan to the City showing the upgradi.ng of Dodd Road at its intersection with Trunk Highway 110 and improvements to the entrance to his shopping center. At that meeting we learned that the cost of this project would approach $1M and that Mn/DOT's participation would only be around 25 %. Council rejected the plan as being too costly. At the same meeting Mn/DOT officials presented an optional plaa that would have the City construct the proposed ringroad around the shopping center (see attached plan) with MSA funds and then after the road was completed turn it over to the State as a new align- ment for Trunk Highway 149 (Dodd Road). The major dra.wback to this plan is that the e�cisting median at Dodd Road and Trunk Highway 110 would be closed to through traffic, allowing right in, right out access only. � As an outcome to the workshop, Council asked for two reports, Mn/DOT was to appraise the vacant Trunk Highway 149 right-of-way and the City Planner, Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban, was to prepare a proposal to study the potential land impacts of constructing the ring road. Mr. Iari called me earlier this month to report that Mn/DOT had completed an appraisal of the vacant Trunk Highway 149 right-of-way as follows: � Total Land - 52 Acres (from I-494 to �North of T.H. 110) Estimated Value - $2.35M (30-40 parcels) : . $1/SF (varies based on zoning) Mn/DOT daes not want to submit this information in writing or be more specific on value because of a potential lawsuit (see attached letter from Brian Birch). Mn/DOT also has promised Mr. Birch that they will begin their actions to return right-of-way to hun in 7une 1992 should the City not have made a decision on their right-of- way needs. Attached is a proposal from DSU to analyze pedestrian and vehicular access issues and land use impacts associated with the proposed ring road. ACTION REQUIItED: This report is an update on the current status of downtown/rir�groad developments. Council needs to authorize DSU to prepare the planning study and establish a Avorkshop session to review the results. Keeping in mind the desire of MnIDOT to resolve this issue in June, it is recommended that Council hold the workshop on 1�esday, May 19, 1992 beginning at 6:30 P.M. ��� ♦ 3 Date: March 4,1992 To: �Imer -Morris State Aid Engineer , � ��, � From: Brian L. Birch � ti� Underlying Fee Owner r�� 755 Willow Lane �, Mendota Heights, MN 55118 4� Subject: SP 1917 (149=1),•901 at TH 110 in Mendota Heights, � Reconveyance to Brian Birch immediately ' � At a joint meeting last fall at my att�orney's office with Senator James Met?en, MarvA Martin, Axel Ridell, Randy P�nt�l, Joyce Birch and myself I asked that the above parcel of land be reconveyed back to myself, because I am the Underlying Fee Owner with legal Lis Pendens Rights which are deliberately being violated by MN DOT and the City of Mendota Heights. This property has been rejected by a Task Force Committee and City Officials for its original purpose for highway construction and no longer meets the criteria for posession by the State. Last year I submitted all the necessary papers for legal Reconveyance and it is long overdue. _ I have not yet received any satisfactory �response since last December. Due to the many deliberate illegal acts by MN DOT and the City of Mendota Heights, I ask that any and all further action and correspondence be sent to my attorney Brian Solem and copied to myself. His address is 295 E. Marie West St. Paul, MN 55118. . �CC: = Sincerely, C 5 Brian �olem, Attorney Axel Ridel, Right of Way Technician James Metzen, State Senator �Randy Pentel - � 4. f` I' Brian L. Birch . �t1NFSO�.q v� y� D Q � � OF TRP�� Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 Reply to � � g-116 3 Telephone No. March 13, 1992 Brian L. Birch 755 Willow Lane Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 Subjec�: S.P. 1917(149=1) 901 At T.Ii. 110 in Mendota Aeights Dear Mr. Birch: This is in response to your 4, 1992. I appreciate your your reconveyance request. reconveyance process when wE Mendota Heights to locate a to halt the reconveyance was to review the implication � (Dodd Road). letter to Mr. Elmer Morris dated March frustration with the slow progress of As you know, we had halted the received the request from the City of 2ing Road on the property. The purpose to give our planning section some time �f such a request on current T. H. 14 9 Mn/DOT acquired the easement so that current T.H. 149 could be relocated to a new alignment. This relocation would eliminate a grade crossing at a skew. Over the years we found it cost prohibit for Mn/DOT to justify such a construction. When the City proposed to build the Ring Road, our planning section felt that it may be in the best interest of both the City and Mn/DOT to reroute T.H. 149 along the proposed Ring Road. This would eliminate the grade crossing and skewed intersection as proposed a long time ago; therefore, improving the safety and traffic flow on Trunk Highway 110 and Dodd Road. Mn/DOT representatives have been meeting with City of Mendota Heights staff and elected officials and we hope to reach some kind of decision very soon. We should either make a decision to reroute T.H. 149 or make an offer to sell the property to you by June of 1992. An Equal Opportunity Employer Brian L. Birch March 13, 1992 Page Two Again, I apologize for the delay, but we need to assure ourselves that Mn/DOT doesn't need the property before offering to sell it to you. Si cerely, , . , , �--� ' � Adeel Z. Lari, P.E. District Right of Way Engineer cc:. Jim Danielson - City of Mendota Heights bcc: Don Mueting - 515 Park � � R.J. Dinneen . Marv Martin . Al Pint Elmer Morris AZL:jj � C:t7ILSi3i�T33�C; Pi.AN:�tEi:S LAtiL�5CAPii Al:C1117'L-.CT"S .3t1l1 FCIZtiT AVI:3tiUE t�C)I2'T13 SUITE 2l{t n1iNN(:./�PC)[.iS, h1N 5i•�tJl 2 April �.992 c, i � .; �v�., �uc� , Hanorable Mayor and Members of .the (�iry Council clo Thomas I.aweil, City Administrator City of Mendota Heights I101 Victaria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 LEITER 4F AGREEMENT Agreement entere� inta taday by and between tha CITY OF MENDOTA �CEIGHTS sametimes called CLIENT, and DAHLGREN, SHARDLOW, AND UBAN, INC., hereinafter sometimes referred to as CONSULTANT, relating ia the ampiayment vf the CONSULTANT as follows: SCOPE OF SERVICES The CONSULTANT wili assist the CL�.EEN'I` in reviewing the Iand use issaes relate� to the praposal by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDO� to realign Dodd Road. through the Central Commercial .Area. The prapased alignment wiii be analy�ed for potential impacts on vehicular and pe�estrian access and circulation, as well as the effects on existing and future develogment related t4 stapes, Iand acquisition, and visibility. In additian, attemativs alignments and Iand use scenarios wilI be examined on a schematic concept level. IN�bRMA1TON TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT The CLIENT will pravide all pertinent information relate�l to the proposed realignment including all drawings prepared by 14InDOT ar fihe City'S EIlgiII�ZiB,� D�aTt.II18Ilt. The.se drawings shauid include existing and proposed topography with contour intervals of 2 feet or less. Also, profiiles or cross-sections af the proposed roadway shauld be pravided if available. In additian, the CLIENT wilt provide pertinent soils, drainage and praperty ownership information for surrounding graperties. Site plans of adjacent develapments showing the current arrangement af buildings, parking Iats and access drives will alsa be required. Any information identi£ying existing vegetation and other significant physical features in the azea should also be provided where available. .,•� � : ••f ���� The CONSULTANT will provide 15 copies af a memo summazizing the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed alignment and any suggested alternatives. Ali drawings will provided will be at 11" x 17" or smaller. The CCINSULTANT will attend one (1) warkshap meeting with the City Council and Pianning Cammission ta present the results of the anatysis. o . , Letter of AgreementlMendata Heights 3 Apri11992 Page 2 COMPLETION T..�VIVIE 'T"he work outlined above will hegin immediately apon receipt af the executed contract. A draft study will be completed no later than May $ for Ciry Staff review and the final study will be camplete�i no later than May 14. The CONSULTANT wi11 be pregared ta present the findings af the analysis at a meeting with the City Council aud Planning Commission an May 19. COST UF SERYICES , �. The work performed will be chazged foi on a time-plus-materials basis at a cost not ta exceed Twa Thousand Five Hundred Dollars {$2,50t}.Ot}}. A2i work and meetings will be c.t}mguted in accordance with the enclosed Standard Rate Schedule. ' All costs incurred will be payable to the CONSULTANT upon receipt of an invaice showing the work completed and the cost of said work. To each invaice not gaid within thirty {30) days shall be added a service charge of one and one-half percent (1.5 percent) per month far each month delinquent. M3 i ll��i :� ��i\� This contract may be terminated upan written notice by either party. In the event af termination, the CLIENT shall pay the CONSULTANT for the wark completed on a time plus materials basis. CONDITIONS HF.REIN AGREID T4: C. John Uban, Chief Executive Qfficer Date DAHLGREN, SHARDLOW, AND L]BAN, INC. John W, Shacdiow, President Date I7AHLGREN, SHARDLOW, AND UBAN, ING CLIENT Charles Mertensotto, Mayor Date CITY {JF MENDOTA �IEIGFITS Kathleen Swanson, City Clerk Date CTTY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Attachment: Standard Rate Schedule y � r STA1'�'DA12D RATE SCI3EDULE DAHLGREN, SHARDLOW, AND UBAN, INC. Staff Member Rate a ' Principat ;. $90.OU to $100.Q0 , ,s � Senior Consultant $bO.Ot} ;to $75.00 GIS Speciaiist $60.00 to $75.00 Senior Planner $50.Q0 to $65.{K} Planner $35.OQ to $50.00 Landscape Architect $45.00 to $65.00 CADD Specialist $55.00 to $65,00 Researcher $35.00 ta $50.00 Draftspersan/Designer $2S.Q0 to $SO.QO Secre#ary $3S.t30 to �45.Q0 Qutside Consultants Per 7ab Plus IS f Supplies Cost Plus 15 % Expenses Cost Plus 15 �O Mileage $0.30 Per Mile Expert Testimony Twa Times Hourly Rate {One-Half Day Minimum) Special Caunsel Howard Dahlgren $15Q.OQ Public Presentations (Jne and One-Half Times Hourly Rate Past Due Accounts 1.5 % Per Month CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Apri16, 1992 TO: Ma.yor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Director of Public W r SUBJECT: Trunk Iiighway 13/I-35 Coopera.tive Agreement �• Council approved a Caoperative Agreement with Mn/DOT at their February 4, 1992 meeting (see attached memo). This agreement provided for the City to pay for its share of the utility adjustments involved with the upgrading of Trunk Highway 13 over I-35E. That agreement provided for the City to pay $16,925. Since that agreement has been approved, Mn/DOT has revised the project to work around a lugh voltage power pole. This revision reduces the amount of the construction on the west end of the project and reduces the City's participation to $9,826.92 RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the City rescind the original Cooperative Agreement with Mn/DOT (No. 69189) and approve the attached revised agreement (No. 69200). ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 92- , RESOLUTION APPROVING MN/DOT AGENCY AGREIIVIENT NO. 69200, SP 1902-42, 1982-112. T0: Mayor, Cit FROM: James £. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS • MEMO J nuary 31, 1992 y Cou '1 and City Administ a Danie �lic Works Director SUBJECT: Mn/DOT Cooperative Agreement-Trunk Highway 13/I��SF DISCIISSION• . Mn/DOT plans to widen and replace the Trunk Highway 13 Bridge over I-35F this summer. In conjunction with the bridge widening the Trunk Highway 13 approaches will be widened and improved, Victoria Road will be realigned and the on-off rantps to I-35E will be improved. As part of this project some of the City's utilities will be affected, watermain and sanitary sewer will need to be lowered on Victoria Road and watermain will need to be insulated or lowered along Trunk Highway 13. The State is required to fund the utility corrections on Victoria Road because those utilities are not within State right-of-way, however, the City's watermain along Trunk Highway 13 is there on permit. The permit requires that the City fund any alterations required for any reason. The City was faced with a similar situation when the Happy Hollow Bridge was replaced`further north on Trunk Highway 13. that time the City had wa.termain and sanitary sewer hung on the bridge. We had to pay to relocate these utilities down the ravine. A.s a result of that experience we began a utility replacement fund to pay for these costs in the future. The attached agreement provides for the City to fund up to $16,925 watermain insulation and alteration costs, there is an ample At of amount of money within the Utility Replacement Fund to cover the costs. RECONIlKENDATION - I recommend that the insulating the waterm,ain Highway 13 can be widened the project to come from ACTION REQIIIRED- City participate with the State in along Trunk Highway 13 so that Trunk and improved this summer. Funding for the City's Utility Reserve Fund. If Council desires to implement the recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 92- , RESOLUT=ON APPROVING 1►�/DOT AGENCY AGREEN�N'P NO. 69189, SP 1902-42, 1982- 112. JED : df w City of Mendota Heights Dakota. County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 92- RESOLUTION APPROVING MN/DOT AGENCY AGREEMENr NO. 69200 SP 1902-42, 1982-112 WHEREAS, Mn/DOT requires City participation ia improving Trunk Highway 13 at its intersection with I-35E by funding of certaia watermain adjustments; and WHEREAS, the City desires to see the improvements completed. �' NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights approves Agency Agreement No. 69200 with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said agreement on behalf of the City. To provide for payment by the City to the State of Minnesota. for the City's share of the costs of the bike path construction to be performed upc�n, along aad adjacent to the inplace Old Victoria. Road (County Road No. 45) northerly approach to Tnink �iighway No. 13 (Sibley Memorial. Highway), and of the City of Mendota Heights owned sanitary sewer and water mai.n construction to be performed upon, along and adjacent to the Trunk Highway No. 13 (Sibley memorial FIighway) easterly approach to Trunk Highway No. 35E under State Projects No. 1902-42 (T.H. 13=194) and No. 1982-112 (T.H. 35E=390). CITY COUNCII.. CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS By -- Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTFST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk � PRE-LETTING STATE OF MINNESOTA AGREEMENT NO. SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECTION COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION 69200 AGREEMENT � . S.P. 1902-42 (T.H. 13=194) S.P. 1982-112 (T.H. 35E=390) Fed. Proj. IM 35E-4(220) Agreement between The State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, and The City of Mendota Heiqhts Re: City cost bike path and utility construction by the�State along T.H. 13 (Sibley Memorial Hwy.) and Victoria Road (C.R. 45) in the vicinity of their intersection AMOUNT ENCUMBERED (None) ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE $9.826.92 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State" and the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, acting by and through its City Council, hereinafter referred to as the "City". � WITNESSETH: WHEREAS the State is about to surfacing, drainage, utility, 69200 form bridge replacement, grading, , curb and gutter, median, and lighting construction and other associated construction upon, along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 13 (Sibley Memorial H��ghway) from Engineer Station 25+41.418 (approximately one-third of a mile west of the Trunk Highway No. 35E interchange) to Engineer Station 99+74 (the west end of Trunk Highway No. 13 Bridge No. 19076 near Lilydale Road) in accordance with State plans, specifications and/or special provisions designated as State Projects No. 1902-42 (T.H. 13=194), No. 1982-112 (T.H. 35E=390) and No. 1982-19820 (T.H. 35E=390), and in the records of the Federal Highway Administration as Minnesota Project IM 35E-4(220); and WHEREAS due to the Victoria Road (County Road No. 45) construction it is necessary to perform certain bike path construction along Victoria Road (County Road No. 45); and . � �5 ► WHEREAS the State contract includes City owned sanitary sewer ��GL facilities and water main facilities construction to be performed along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 13 (Sibley Memorial Highway); and � � � 69200 WHEREAS the City has expressed its willingness to participate in the costs of the bike path and utilities construction and associated construction engineering as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS Minnesota Statute section 161.20, subdivision 2 authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements�with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and improving the trunk highway system. IT I8, THEREFORE, MIITIIALLY AGREED AS FOLLOAB: ARTICLE I- CON3TRIICTION BY THE STATE Section A. Contract Award The State shall advertise for bids and award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder for State Projects No. 1902-42 (T.H. 13=194), No. 1982-112 (T.H. 35E=390) and No. 1982-19820 (T.H. 35E=390) in accordance with State plans, specifications and/or special provisions which are on file in the office of the . Commissioner of Transportation at St. Paul, Minnesota, and are made a part hereof by reference with the same force and effect as though fully set forth herein. Section B. Direction and Supervision of Construction The State shall direct and supervise all construction activities performed under the construction contract, and perform all � 69200 construction engineering and inspection functions in connection with the contract construction. All of the contract construction shall be performed in compliance with the approved plans, specifications and/or special provisions. � Section C. Plan Chanqes, Additional Construction, Etc.�• The State shall make changes in the plans and/or contract construction, which may include the City cost participation construction covered under this agreement, and shall enter into any necessary addenda, change orders and/or supplemental agreements with the State's contractor which are necessary to cause the contract construction to be performed and completed in a satisfactory manner. However, the State's District Engineer at St. Paul or his authorized representative will inform the appropriate City official of any proposed addenda, change orders and/or supplemental agreements to the construction contract which will affect the City cost participation construction covered under this agreement. Section D. Satisfactory Com�letion of Contract The State shall perform all other acts and functions necessary to cause the construction contract to be completed in a satisfactory manner. ARTICLE II - INSPECTION BY THE CITY The City cost participation construction covered under this agreement 4 69200 shall be open to inspection by the City. If the City believes the City cost participation construction covered under this agreement has not been properly performed or that the construction is defective, the City shall inform the State's District Engineer in writing of those defects. Any recommendations made by the City are not binding on the State. The State shall have the exclusive right�'to determine whether the City cost participation construction covered under this agreement has been satisfactorily performed by the State's contractor. ARTICLE III - BASIS OF PAYMENT BY THE CITY Section A. SCHEDIILE "I" A Preliminary SCHEDULE "I" is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. The Preliminary SCHEDULE "I" includes all anticipated ; City cost participation construction items and the construction engineering cost share covered under this agreement, and is based on engineer's estimated unit prices. Section B. City Cost Participation Construction 100 Percent Cit� Cost: ► 1. All of the bike path construction to be performed upon, along and adjacent to the inplace Old Victoria Road (County Road No. 45) northerly approach to Trunk Highway No. 13 (Sibley Memorial Highway) under State Projects No. 1902-42 (T.H. 13=194) and No. 1982-112 (T.H. 35E=390). The construction includes, but is not 5 69200 limited to, sawing bituminous pavement, bituminous surfacing and aggregate base. . �� � y�� � 2 oR �ER �iGES � N A��.� 5 2. All of the City-owned sanitary sewer and water main construction to be performed upon,'along and adjacent to the Trunk Highway No. 13 (Sibley Memorial Highway) easterly approach��to Trunk Highway No. 35E under State Projects No. 1902-42 (T.H. 13=194) and No. 1982-112 (T.H. 35E=390). The construction includes, but is not limited to, water main insulation, and miscellaneous reconnections, relocations and adjustments. Section C. Construction Enqineering Costs The City shall pay a prorated share of construction engineering costs for field engineering and inspection, preparation of progress and final estimate reports, and material testing and inspection in connection with the City cost participation construction covered under this agreement. Those construction engineering costs shall consist of charges made by State personnel assigned to the - construction contract and shall be recorded under State construction cost accounting code numbers appropriate for such construction engineering activities on the forms "Time Report" (Form TC 30) and "Cost Distribution" (Form TC 32). The City construction engineering cost share shall be determined using the method and formula set forth in the attached SCHEDULE "I". 69200 Note: For the purpose of estimating the City's share of the construction engineering costs, the State shall use an amount equal to 8 percent of the estimated total cost of the City participation construction covered under this agreement until the final City participation construction'cost share is computed. �• Section D. Addenda, Chanqe Orders and Supplemental AQreements The City shall share in the costs of construction contract addenda, change orders and/or supplemental agreements which are necessary to complete the City cost participation construction covered under this agreement. Section E. Settlements of Claims The City shall pay to the State its share of the cost of any settlements of claims made with the State's contractor. All liquidated damages assessed the State's contractor in connection with the construction contract shall result in a credit shared by the State and the City in the same proportion as their total construction cost share covered under this agreement is to the total contract construction cost before any deduction for liquidated damages. ARTICLE IV - PAYMENT BY THE CITY Section A. Estimate and Advancement of the City's Cost Share It is estimated that the City's share of the costs of the contract 7 3 69200 construction plus the construction engineering cost share is the sum of $9,826.92 as shown in the attached Preliminary SCHEDULE "I". Upon award of the construction contract the State shall prepare a Revised SCHEDULE "I" based on construction contract unit prices and shall submit a copy to the City.� The City shall advance to the Commissioner of Transportation the City's total estimated cost share as shown in the Revised SCHEDULE "I", be it more or less than the sum of $9,826.92, upon execution of this agreement and upon receipt of a request from the State for such advancement of funds. Section B. Final Payment by the City Upon completion and acceptance of the contract_construction and upon computation of the final amount due the State's contractor, the State shall prepare a Final SCHEDULE "I" based on final quantities of City cost participation construction performed, and shall submit a copy to the City. If the final cost of the City participation covered under this agreement exceeds the amount of funds advanced by the City, the City shall, upon receipt of a request from the State, prompt�y pay the difference to the State without interest. If the final cost of the City participation covered under this agreement is less than the amount of funds advanced by the City, the State shall promptly return the balance to the City without interest. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute section 15.415, the State waives claim for any amounts less than $2.00 over the amount of City funds 8 0 69200 previously advanced to the State, and the City waives claim for the return of any amounts less than $2.00 of those funds advanced by the City. Section C. Acceptance of �ity's Cost and Completed Construction � The computation by the State of the amount due from the'�•City shall be final, binding and conclusive. Acceptance by the State of the completed contract construction shall be final, binding and conclusive upon the City as to the satisfactory completion of the contract construction. ARTICLE V - GENERAL PROVISIONS Section A. Plan Changes The City may request changes in the plans. If the State determines that the requested plan changes are necessary and/or desirable, the State will cause those plan changes to be made. ��croR�� Section B. Replacement of castincts .. �uL'( / The City shall furnish the State's contractor with new casti�s i� and/or parts for all inplace City-owned facilities constructed hereunder when replacements are required, without cost or expense to the State or the State's contractor, except for replacement of castings and/or parts broken or damaged by the State's contractor. E 0 : � � � Section C. Utility Permits The City shall, within 90 days after the satisfactory completion of the City-owned utilities contract construction, submit to the Director of the State's Pre-Letting Services Section five copies of a permit application, includYng "as built" sketches, for all City-owned utilities constructed upon and within the trunk highway;right-of-way. Applications for permits shall be made on State form "Application For Utility Permit On Trunk Highway Right-Of-Way" (Form TP2525). section D. Maintenance by the city Upon satisfactory completion of the City-owned sanitary sewer and water main facilities construction to be performed under the construction contract, the City shall provide for the proper maintenance of those facilities, without cost or expense to the State. Upon satisfactory completion of the bike path construction to be performed under the construction contract, the City shall provide for the proper maintenance of the bike path, without cost or expense to the State. Maintenance shall include, but not be limited to, snow and debris removal and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the bike path in a safe and usable condition. Section E. Additional DrainaQe Neither party to this agreement shall drain any additional drainage 10 0 69200 into the storm sewer facilities constructed under the construction contract that was not included inithe drainage for which the storm sewer facilities were designed without first obtaining permission to I do so from the other party. The drainage areas served by the storm sewer facilities constructed under the construction contract are shown in a drainage area map, EXHIBIT "Drainage Area", �hich is on file in the office of the State'slDistrict Hydraulics Engineer at � Oakdale and is made a part hereoflby reference with the same force and effect as though fully set forth herein. Section F. Claims Al1 employees of the State and all other persons employed by the State in the performance of contract construction and/or construction engineering covered under this agreement shall not be considered employees of the City. All claims that arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of the employees while so engaged and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the employees while so engaged on contract construction and/or construction engineering covered under this agreement shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the City. Al1 employees of the City and all other persons employed by the City in the performance of maintenance covered under this agreement shall not be considered employees of the State. 11 All claims that arise � 69200 under the Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of the employees while so engaged and all claims made by any. third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the employees while so engaged on maintenance covered under this agreement shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the State . � � The City at its own sole cost and expense shall defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless the State and all of its agents, officers and employees of and from all claims, demands, proceedings, actions or causes of action of whatsoever nature or character arising out of or by reason of maintenance covered under this agreement including an action or claim which alleges negligence of the State, its agents, officers or employees. Section G. Nondisarimination The provisions of Minnesota Statute section 181.59 and of any applicable ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination shall be considered part of this agreement as if fully set forth herein. Section H. AQreement Approval Before this agreement shall become binding and effective, it shall be approved by a City Council resolution and receive approval of State and City officers as the law may provide in addition to the 12 Commissioner of Transportation or his authorized representative. �• 13 69200 69200 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF the parties have executed this agreement by their authorized officers. � DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Recommended for approval: �, , By � Director Pre-Letting Servic s Section By District Engineer ' By � Deputy Division Director � Technical Services Division Approved: � By ' Deputy Commissioner � of Transportation � � Date ' (Date of Agreement) OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Approved as to form and execution: By Special Asst. Attorney General 14 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS BY � . Mayor Date By City Administrator Date DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION Approved: By (Authorized Signature) Date DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE Approved: By - Date (Authorized Signature) e PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE "I�' - 1 - (P) PLAN QUANTITY 69200 NUMBER I SWORK1ITEM42 I UNIT I QUAN;ITY I UNIT PRICE I C(ij . 2211.503 AGGREGATE BASE PLACED CLASS 5 P CU. YD. 55.00 11.40 627.00 2331.508 TYPE 31 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 27.00 20.50 553.50 0503.602 RECONNECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EACH 3.00 220.00 660.00 0504.602 RELOCATE HYDRANT EACH 950.00 950.00 0504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX—WATER EACH 2.00 130.00 260.00 0504.602 ADJUST CURB BOX EACH 5.00 70.00 350.00 0504.605 WATERMAIN INSULATION S. YD. 178.00 18.00 3 204.00 TOTAL 6 604.50 1 100% CITY — 6 604.50 �� � �..o.� � � — 2 — (P) PLAN QUANTITY 69200 NUMBER I S.WORK9ITEM12 I UNIT I QUANjITY I UNIT PRICE I C(2; 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH LIN. FT. 490.Q0 3.50 1 715.00 2211.503 AGGREGATE BASE PLACED CLASS 5 P CU. YD. 30.00 11.40 342.00 2331.508 TYPE 31 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 15.00 20.50 307.50 0504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX-WATER EACH 1.00 130.00 130.00 TOTAL 2 494.50 2 100% CITY - 2 494.50 - 3 - � r � � ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING COMPUTATION (Based on To�al Contract Costs} ) : COMPUTATSON: C = Tatal Contract Amount E= Tatal. Construction Engineering Gost Amaunt Incurred . . P = Pro Rata Percentage (E = C} x 100 = P {Percentage �ar Construction Engineering} �: - 4 - , . A J CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 2, 1992 T0: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assista SUBJECT: CASE N0. 92-06: Henry Sibley Senior High School - Sign Variances - DISCIISSION Mr. Lois Rockney, Director of Business Affairs for Independent School District No. 197,'', and Ms. Marsha Rnuth, parent's representative for the Class of 1991, were present at the March 24th Planning Commission to discuss their proposed sign. The sign as proposed involves the consideration of three variances. They are: ; 1. 21.5 (12)a - A variance to the surface area size in an R-1 Zone to allow a 312 square foot sign. 2. 21.5(9)c - A variance to the section prohibiting the lighting of signs., 3. 21.5(12)e - A variance to the height limitation of ten feet (10') to allow the sign to be installed on the building face at thirty-one feet, four inches (31' 4��) . Please see attached Planner's Report for a more detailed discussion of the proposed sign. At the public hearing, conducted by the Planning Commission, some neighbors of Henry Sibley High School appeared and expressed concerns about the proposed sign. Please see the March 24, 1992 Planning Commission Minutes for the record of the meeting. � RECONIl�NDATION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to close the public hearing. The Planning Commission voted 5-2 (Tilsen, Dwyer) to recommend that City Council'approve two variances; one a sign surface area variance of 310 sq. ft. to allow the 312 sq. ft. proposed sign and, two, a height variance of twenty-one feet, four inches (21' 4") to allow the sign�to be located on the school wall at thirty-one feet, four inches (31' 4°), as proposed. The Planning Commission's motion included the recommendation that City Council deny the variance to allow the sign to be lit. The motion k • included a recommendation that the School District consider coordinating the design of the new sign with the existing sign on the north side of the building and attempt to install directional signage at Highway 110 and Delaware Avenue. ACTION REQIIIRED If the Council desires to implement the Planning Commission's recommendation, they should pass a motion approving two variances: 1. A 310 sq. ft. sign surface area variance in the R-1 District to allow the sign as proposed: 2. A sign height variance of twenty-one feet, four inches (21' 4") to allow the sign to be placed on the wall at �'� ` thirty-one feet, four inches (31' 4"), as proposed; and pass another motion directing staff to prepare a resolution of denial for the proposed lighting of the sign and authorize the Ma.yor to execute this resolution. KLB:kkb 0 PLANMNG REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATIt�N: ACTION REQLJESTED: �ackground: <:t):•::l>l.; i.•:�., i•E :�'v'�F.t;ti i.:�.`.I�S�;�:�.I't '�E.�'il�';'{'("�'S 3Ui1 !'U:ti7' :1\'ii\lJL^ '�O12'TIl St�t'I't: 21tt �.i��:.,t.:�r<�i.is ��ti ;�; ic�i �,��.. ��� ;,��•� 24 Manch 199� 92-04 Dr. Bzuce Anderson, ISD 197 Henry Sibley High Schaol Sign Variance The applicant is proposing tv instali signage on th� sauth wall of Iienry Sibley I�'igh Schoal in ihe foma of individual ptastic letters. Tt� sign is ta be installed by Midway Sign Company and the drawings and the drawings and other materials submitied for this case we� prepa�d by Ricliaard Kruse on behatf af School Dist�iict 197. As indicteti on the Agplicant's drawings, tlie sign would neead "Henry Sibley High School", The letters are W be 4 feet in height and the sign is 78 feet in length, making the sign's total surface area 312 square f�et, The High Schaal is located in the R-1 District, which limits the surface area of signage to 2 square feet The�fare, a variance of 310 square feet is necessary to allow the sign as prapased. In additian, the Applicant has indicated that the sign may be lit by a series of SQO watt quartz lighting fixtures to be mounted an the roof below the wall where the sign is to be located. Section 21S(9k in the Ordinance prohibits #he use of extemal flood lighting on any sign in the CSity. Should the School District decide to light the sign as shown an the drawings, a variance to this section would also be required. A similar request for a sign variance was granted last year to allow the installation of a nameplate sign aver the entry an the northeast side of the building. This sign has been ir�stalled. Variance Criteria: The intent of the ordinance restrictions in the R-i District is ta avaid excessive signage and the visual clutter and safety hazards that accompany overuse of sigiage. The 2-square-foot limit is inLended to allaw address and small namep2ate sig�,s for each homeowner. Qeazly, this staz�dard is nat intended to keep schools, cemeteries, churches and other types of uses that are permitted withir► the R 1 District from having adequaie signage. Schools are a umique use vvithin the R 1 District and should be allawed variations from the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance. The task here is to batance the needs of the school, i.e., pmvide a sign that can be seen from Highway 110, while still accomglishing the City's aesthetic and safety abjectives with respect ta signage. The sign standards in #he City's Zoning Ordir►ance are not designed to accommadate #he needs of a Iazge Dr. Bruce Anderson, Case No. 92-04 Page 2 institution, especially when the building is located so far from the adjacent roadway, as is the situation with Henry Sibley High School. Therefore, we need to look at other methods for determining what is appropriate in this case. The sign designer has proposed the use of individual4foot high letters. However, the letter visibility chart included with the application would suggest that a 30-inch or 36-inch letter would be adequate based on the distance from Highway 110 (1,200 - 1,400 feet). However, Mr. Kruse of the Ivfidway Sign Company did a field test using mock ups of �e 4foot high letters and he has provided photographs showing how they would appear from the south The photographs were shot from various distances. :, The furthest of these photos appears to have been shot from the north frontage road some 350 feet � north of Highway 110. We believe these photographs demonstrate that the sign, as proposed, would be in scale with the building and would not be obtrusive. Judging from these photos, if the sign were ,.� much smaller, it would not be readable from Highway 110. � The standards for signage in the commencial districts� where larger signs are permitted, are based on the idea that larger buildings can accommodate larger wall signs. A large wall can "absorb" more signage than a small wall. If we were to apply the formula used in the B-2, B-3, B-4 and I Districts, disregarrling the 100-square foot maximum, a wall sign of approximately 320 square feet could be accommodated on the wall of the Sibley High Sc�ool where the proposed sign is to be located. This compares to the 312-square-foot sign being proposed. There is also a similar sign on the southwest wall of St Thomas Academy. This sign faces Mendota Heights Road and the intersection of I-494 and I-35E. The S� Thomas sign is located approximately 700 feet from Mendota Heights Road and 1,800 to 2,000 feet from the eastbound lanes of I�94. The sign is of a similar design as the one pnoposed for Sibley High School in that it is comprised of lazge individual letters attached to the wall of the building. Another issue related to the proposed sign is that of lighting. As stated earlier the Zoning Ordinance prnhibits floodlights or other extemal methods of lighring signs. The primary intent of Section 21S(9)c of the Zoning O�inance is to protect adjacent residendal stru�s frnm excess light shining in the windows and to avoid bright lights, or moving or flashing lights from distracting passing motorists. Due to the location and orientation of the south wall of the building, the proposed lighting should not create a serious detriment to the surrounding neighborhood or adjacent roadways. However, the building is already well lit There are eight floodlights on the south wall that are visible from H'ighway 110. These lights are mounted on the roof and shine down on the building wall and the ground around the building. There are perhaps four or five single-family homes in this area (on the South St Paul side of Delaware) that have a view of the south wall whe�+e the sign is to be located. It may be possible to reduce the overall lighting as part of this applicatioa The lighting proposed in associating with the sign is designed as u�lighting with the fixtures attached to the roof. Generally, this lighting scheme would be less visible from the ground than the existing lights for two reasons. The first is that up- lighting is generally less likely to be a problem for adjacent properties by virtue of the fact that the source is pointing up and away from most viewers. Second, the proposed lights ac�e to be mounted on the roof, therefore, the edge of the building would shield �e lights from the ground. Perhaps by installing the additional lights for the sign, there would be less need for the other floodlights and some or all of �em could be removed, thereby diminishing the overall light emitted from the school properiy. This is an issue that could be discussed with the School District as part of this process. Mr. Kruse has also provided a sample of the material that the letters are to be made of. The material is a plastic product Plastics are commonly used for exterior signs and there are several types of plastics, such as lexan, that have pmven to be very durable and make an excellent sign material. Plastic tends to look less attractive than metal, but it is much easier to maintain and may hold its Dr. Bruce Andersan, Case Na. 92-Q4 Page 3 appearance for a longer period of bime. Since these let#ers will not be seen close up, there is little cancem for appearance. We are concemed as to how the letters will be attached to the building for both aesthetic and safety reasons. The detail showing how the letters aze to be attached is poorly drawn and difficult t,o understand. The applicant should be reqnired tc� ciarify this issue priar to approval. The general lacation of the sign on the building should help fill in this blank brick wall and lend a finislung touch to the appearance af the bu�ilding. Action. The procedure for a variance in Mendota Heights includes a public hearing when the signatures of the adjacent properiy owners have not been obtaineci. In this case, staff determined that it wou2d be appmpriate to hold a public hearing. After holding the public hearing, the Commission shauld make w• a recommendation to the City Council regarding tiie requested variances. �'' I ►.�. • i , ,.;. .�� - � .' .a-!4 A •� ~�i , I , . � ` . � �N � � ' • . . �• , i � a �,; � . . _ . _— r I MEN00T4 NE16MT3 PAR 3 GO!„F CWRSE . + � � �� { PUBIK} t j � � . . , . .;'�� w � � . • � " ' ".` � , . . • . ' �.� . • _�._ . • •� - ,,,, � . . � — � �' • '.�' _ ' � • ' . _.. • . r ~ � • —7 '�' w— • • . � ♦ • . . . 1 � ,� ; N } �a � � _ :.. , y yi t . .; _...r .. .� �� i��/ � ��' ' ' s, \ ���� � � � � s `�, �_� ,_ . .�� � ��r� � • �-1 , �l _.1 � '� �. fA ` � _ i'si �..'. �. .�T� `J �'� ' . � ; _ � �t • �� --- ' , '. .1 a '. .� ,i�� � •• F �' •�' ':•; � '• , . • � •- . . , _ _ —��..—r�� � • \ '�''•��' � • � �ii._'. ����`����� � ■���r�:�v � .. i� � � � ��.o �•�eW��es ����.� � �y; x Y ��,�.. . oQa�o� o�i�►'� �� r �. ., ��, �r �� � ii'it1 - � ..i � '3%i .+ , 0 � � �.�,�,.. �: � � �� � �� � � ,�. 5 "�`�, <. �� � � � '`,�: �� � �' �, ^ � � � � x , � � � � � _ ��� :it.',��7'..�"�/ T �t� � � �' � �;yz cf �. ,., � .% � %1�f Q � �� �r4n.,c�..c� ��o�rx�,.w,�ro � • r;�. ' k � �.Y� �..o, - s . � � � �� � ���� • � * w fii� " f "y` � � °3'{` :.:i � �� ��`°m"'w �. ��v»�+ -- �;? � � .;:;J �' ' s ' g� � y` A �* � '� • , t�"�5'���' <�"M��`.�,��'''',� ^�"�'�l�' lA .1 s>+'Y�q ,�3� iy � �� .if7� , � . �€�.� t x��*�t% ;�{� .��.�r,� � � ,kY� � ' � � �`���'��x����� .n • e.tK � ''�" ��o .,�, * �' `^ '' �` �_�� f �� .. �.; :1��� �`���'� � wx ' ��h��,; t Y� �'..'C� � � i � '�£'3� } ;�� - �3'1'�.+.'i � � � �N/%>//: f"'S ��,n,^• ww i -;.,�. � �.�� ■ ;� ��� ,�""�I' �� �z�� � �f �;`,��_..;,f �` �n �� � ��� �,i^ � i` �� =�..�� — ��� � Y�f w." � ' { . _ _ _ .... O `�yx-�<�'` � �� � % �� #�s:�,' `' +'�: �v�"',A'� :,/�„r ' ` .i � u 1 . �������'�".� +�,� S til,'ar "/M% '7 z,r'fiN`^r'�x J _� � `'s'11�'l:ilfar{_��:.1t5� � d�i���.���l.-`aI�` � J�.. ' Qmiil�O�Q Q� <,wa;�<.`;: � ,.�.,. ,•� ;a,�" ;H �i ���- 0 1 , � ; of,� 4 _ � � � °r p.o i � /t•� ��;�� * �S ,j�/>. � _ � �r � i�Q. 4 � `�� ��tV�[�� t � t �f � �\ I �� � � O c��'i o�':n,�= ., � � � ��' '!e�' � r, O�0► � ��.� � l�aa��� � r � ' � �'�4il:i� �� . � •l��bO� � �:1 � � � � !,� �� � � � ���i�i� � t�� (�� a� �'pa' a A .t:�,., � MIDWAY SIGN COMPANY, INC, 5lNCE 1g34 444 PRIOR AVENUE ST. PAUL, MINN. 55104 612�645-4l88 FAX 645-9 i $0 " HENRY SIBLEY HIGH SCHOOL " LETTER INSTALLATION 0 C���l���i[I�� IT I� OUR INTENT T� FURNISH AND INSTALL ONE SET OF MOLDED "*.�, " UVE� " PLASTIC LETTER� TO THE SOUTH WALL OF " HENRY SIBLEY HIGH SCHOOL", F�R IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES. THE LETTER HEIGHT HAS BEEN CHOSEN AS 48" BECAUSE OF THE DISTAI+TCE TO HIGHWAY 110 AND DELAWARE AVENUE. CSEE NOTE #1) '� WE HAVE DONE VI�IBILITY TE�TS WITH A MOCK-UP LETTER AT THAT.,�•- HEIGHT WITH MR. BROM AlVTD I�fR, ANDER�QN, AND FIAVE DETERMINED '.��, � THAT AT THA.T DISTANCE, THE LETT�RS WOULD BE VISIBLE A]SCD ••� REAI}ABLE IF PRC3FERLY �FACED. CSEE PKQTQS ATTACHED TQ DISPLAYI Y THE COLQR WE ARE RECONEMEND I NG I S# 214�, I VQRY, AS TIi I S WOULD �. '•' MATCH THE BUILDING TRIM AND WOULD ALSO GIVE GOOD VISIBILITY. � < SEE COLOR SAMPLE ATTACHED TO DISPLAY >, � „ THE MANUFACTURER, GEMINI INCORPORATED, OF CANDTON FALL�, MN, GIVE� A 7 YEAR GUARANTEE AGAINST BREAKAGE AND FAI?ING. { TH'IS' � WOULD NOT CCIVER THE GASE OF SOMEONE SHOOTING AT THE LETTERS >;� THE LETTER � WOULD BE �LT?'AGHED -TD - THE M�kSONRY --�•A-�T �--QF-'�'HE-� ---- �•�•'��--=--� EU I LU I NC� THROUGH TIiE 3/4" I+II DE L I P THAT SURROiTNDS THE LETTEfiS, AI�'I7 i+TQULD BE ATTACHED W I TIi MECHAN Z CAL FASTENERS � . �EALED WITH E-G000 INDUSTRIAL �ILICON ADHESIVE/SEALANT. THE LETTERS WOULD SE PLACED 12' ABOVE THE ROOF LEVEL FOR EASEx�: OF I N�TALLAT I ON ANI} FQR FLTTURE PQSS Z BLE L I GFIT I NG BY QLiART2 FIXTURE� MOUNTED ON THE LOWER ROOF, OUT OF SITE OF PASSERBY'S , A POSSIBLE LIGHTING CONFIGURATION IS SHOWN ON THE BUILDING ELEVATION D�AWING A� A SUGGESTION. � I F THERE I� ANY OTFiER I NFORMAT I Oi� TT�AT YOU WOULD NEED, PLEASE � CON�.`ACT ME ANT7 I WILI� RESPOND. THANK YOC3 FC?R YQUR CQNS I DERAT I ON � -► �- �, � �,� , I . . .. _ ._. .. _ '., .°'"'�L-.' ._. •�; ; �,ti =.,:,�.-. � ..: �.. .r=�:�.k�:�.ti . � . .:.:.:...:��.r. � ' �\�� ' �r�\��'�': i t�, '��, "���� , y `:J,- l• ' �"-f•:�y:4t^ �r` . ._ c `�'t • , ... �.� .. _.'.'b ?.i}i!3� r'if::ai.:S `..;. °e^i`�?�`'e .d�:,: .. ''"';,'�:�'?;:` • � �' ��:<��.. ; ;;� rc' i :�:?;i: ;'•e..�' ; ;�. ,y , r,s: ;`.: = ;y�",�'''�'=g�: �. --t ,. j r"��'`' ""�'!:"�" �; `. p �i <'«:: ;.�; .: �r =��j�� ��tiit ' 7 G� 4' �'%1.7: ���� <<. C ity c�� f_ - .,�, ,� # �,� ,��.endota. Hei�,hts � APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQ;QEST ����a. � -�� Qa �� Date of Application ( u 9�- Fee Paid `��,���"�`7 �`�'7 ApplicantName: �C�-�'So vk .�C`- t�r"U �e PH• �$ i" 23G�a (L.ast} (Pnrst) (Mn Address: � 1`��t �7 t�e t�.t.,.>��--� ,�e - C,,c� S t`� iUl l�.! �SI I� '�. (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) Owner Name: �� D ( -�'l � � CLast} (F'ust} {M13 Address: ��'^`�- (Number c& Street} . {CitY) (State} iliP) Street Locatian of Property iu Q�zestion: Sc v�.�¢, - Legal Description of Ptoperty: r Type of Request: Rezoning Canditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U,D. ' Pian_Approva2 - Comprehensive Plan Amendment tsln _� Variance � c� � s r zz.¢.. g- 1 r q h� t,.�.. 1 Subdivisian Approval �� � Wetlands Permit Other (attach explanatian} Applicable City Ordinance Number �� � Section ' Present Zoning of Property �� r Present Use _ f�14 ���v (-,�r5�{v't �� 6�'� �.e..S Proposed Zozring of Property ;�- i Praposed Use `� C.' �1ars t I hereby deciare that al1 statements made iu this request and o e additianal material are true, - � � fL� ,,/��',�'- . f r {,�r� .} (Signature of Applicant) ������ . {Date) � {Received by - TiElej . . - 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1V�iN' �`�°�55118 .:-�- 452 • 1$50 ��� °;� -'.:55 :;�,.-' � �.., .,- .� , . � . , •. � .. . - � - :�= - . " ..� �� � - �� � .� _ . :.. � ' �} C ity o� ..., . 1Viendota Heights March 11, 1992 Dear Property Owner: The enclosed Notice of Hearing has been sent to you as a property owner within one hundred (100) feet of Henry Sibley High School, as required by the City's Zoning Ordinance for public hearings to consider a Variance by the Planning Commission. :h � The School District is proposing to place letters spelling Henry Sibley High School on the south facing wall, to be visible from Delaware Avenue and Highway 110. The proposal asks for Variances to the sign size and lighting provisions of the City's Zoning Ordinance. The sign is proposed to consist of four foot high letters that would be mounted on the brick wall approximately at twelve (12) feet above the roof of the first floor on the south facing wall of the high school. This requires a variance to sign size in an R-1 district. The proposal is also seeking approval to use lights to illuminate the sign at night and this also requires a variance. The public hearing for the requested variances will be held at 8 o'clock p.m. oa March`24,''1992 at'the Council Chambers;•City Hall,�• �y� located at 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights. Sincerely, C�''(/'?'�^ ' , Revin Batchelder Administrative Assistant 1101 Victoria Curve �1Viendota.Heights, 1ViNi- 55118 ,.- 452�1850 •"� : 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HgIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING Ma.rch 11, 1992 TO WSOM IT MAY CONCFsRN: t . �1 Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of Mendota Heights will meet at 8:00 o'clock p.m., or as soon as possible thereafter, on Tuesday, March 24, 1992, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Independent School District 197, for , Variances for Sign Size and Sign Lighting at the following described property: All that part of the east half of the NE 1/4 of Section 25, Township 28 North, Range 23 W. More particularly, this property is the Henry Sibley High School located at 1897 Delaware Avenue. This notice is pursuant to City of-Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed Sign Variances will be heard at this meeting. Rathleen M. Swanson City Clerk ^ �6.`N . ' � K �. . . - . - • - �.r: �.. x ' . - f": � � _ � . . V , _ , . _ . ', r,.Y� r:; • �t6'- „ ' + . . _ . . . — _.. ...c.. � .� . ... . _ .. . .. . .. . . �. , . . >- . � City o� ��,, , 1Viendota Heights April 2, 1992 Dr. Bruce Anderson Superintendent Independent School District No. 197 1897 Delaware Avenue Mendota Heights, NIl�T 55118 Dear Dr. Anderson: Your application for a Sign Variance will be considered by the City _ . Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday. April 7, 1992. The Council meeting starts at 8:00 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting in order that your application will receive Council consideration . The Planaiag Commission recoa�ended 5-2 (Tilsea, Dwyer) to recommend that the City Council approve two variaacesf one a siga surface area variance of 310 sq. ft. to allow the 312 sq. ft. proposed siga and two, a height variance of twenty-one feet, four inches (21' 4p) to allow the sign to be located on the school wall at thirty-one feet, four inches (31' 4"), as proposed. The Planaing Coarmission's motion iacluded the recoauneadation that the City Couacil deny the variance to allow the sign to be lit. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, jG�,c,i�;... r Revin Batchelder Administrative Assistant ; C . . �. Enclosures: City Council Agenda � Staff Memo to City Council cc: Ms. Lois Rocknev, Director of Business Affairs 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1VIN • 55118 452 • 1850 � , � - -� � 1t�T C3� .,�.. . ,��eridota �eights MarCh 20 r 1.992 Dr. Bruce Anderson Superintendent Independent Schocil District No. 197 1897 Delaware i�.venue Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Dr. Andersan: Your applica�.ion far a Variance will be considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, March 24. The Plann.ing Commis�ian meeting starts at 7:30'o'cl.ock P.M., here at the Cit� Ha3l in the Cauncil Chambers. Yau, ar a representative should plan ou atten.ding the meeting, in order that. your appli.cation wi21 receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please fee�.� free to contaet me. Sincerely, . �, r ��W1^^- ""' Revin Batchelder Administrati.ve Assistant RLB:kkb Encl.osures : P3.anning Camma.ssion Agenda Planner's Report Hearing Notice . cc : Lois Rockn.ey 11�1 �l'ictoria Curve � 1V�endota Heights,lViN • 55228 452 • 285ii 1� � r 0 MIDWAY SIGN COMPANY, INC. � SINCE 1934 • � • 444 PRIOR AVENUE ST. PAUL, MINN. 55104 � " 612/645-9188 FAX 645-9180 K . � ., ` � LETTER VISIBILITY CHART READABLE MAXIMUM DISTANCE ' READABLE FOR MAXIMUM LETTER , OISTANCE IMPACT HEIGHT , 100' 30' . 3" 150' 40' 4" ' - 200' 60' 6" 350' 80' � 8" 400' 90' ' 9" � 450' 100' 10" . 525' 120' 12�, ' 630' � 150' 15" 750' 180' ' 18" , 1000j 240' '24" .. .. ._ 1250'• 300' 30" 1500' 360' 36" 1750' 420' - 42" 2000' 480' 48" � 2250' S40' S4" 2500' 600' ' 60" NOTE: The following distances will vary approx- . mately1096 with various color combinations. ..... ' 5,280' equals one (1) mile... maximum distance in color would be RED or BLACK on WHITE background. � DIAL 1-800-LETTERS , GEMINI INCORPORATED . , 103 Mensing Way � � • CANNON FALLS, MINNESOTA 55009•0018 •. PHONE: (5071263-3957 � ...--� ------'-= " '...-. .r--�'"'"�-.___.-"-""'"... _._..� ��nr���w �� ���� ����� �� 1 �� �-�-� s oCY ,., CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS T0: Ma.yor, City Council and City April 2, 1992 Administ . J FROM: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assi�t� SUBJEGT: CASE N0. 92-05: Centre Pointe Medical Sign Variance DISCUSSI4N Ms. Deborah Jeffrey, representing Centre Pointe Medical Clinic, appeared before the February 25th Planning Commissian and presented a case for two �ign variances to allow �he medical clinic ta build a larger, taller sign {�ee attached Planner's Report and Application). At the meeting, the Commissioners e�cpressed a concern that a hardship was not demonstrated and that �uch a large variance from the established sign requirement� wouid Set a bad precedent. Some Cammissioners felt it would be bet�er to review �he B-1 Zoning District sign requirements for modification, than to grant a variance af such scale. This planning case was ariginally scheduled for the March 3rd City Council meeting, but at the appZicant's request, was held over until Apr3.1 7th. Staff has received a letter dated March 30, 1992 from HealthEast since the Planning Commission meeting (�ee a�tached}. The Planning Commission voted 5-1 {Duggan) to recommend that the City Council deny the requested variances and direct s�aff to review the B-]. Zoning District sign requirements for any apprapriate changes. ACTION REQIIIRSD Zf the City Council desires to implement the recommendation of the Planning Commission, they should find that there is na deman�tra�.ion o� hardship and direc� s�aff to prepare �he appropriate resol.ution oi denial. , �� HealthEast ��; March 30, 1992 Mayor Charles Mertensotto City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 559 Capitol Boulevard 6 South St. Paul, MN 55103 612-221-2520 FAX 612-221-2428 RE: Sign Variance (s) for Centre Point Clinic,:1150 Highway 110 Dear Mayor: As you know, HealthEast, a non-profit corporation, owns and operates a medical clinic located on Highway 110 directly across from the City Hall building. The clinic is endeavoring to provide the City of Mendota Heights and the surrounding areas with health care services in the areas of both primary care (family practice) and immediate care (urgent care). Unfortunately, because the building itself is set back quite a distance from the road, its fundamental mission is currently being hindered despite the marketing efforts that were undertaken to inform the community of its egistence. To help rectify the situation, HealthEast is seeking a sign variance to increase the overall dimensions of the egisting monument sign. With this accomplished, the visibility and knowledge of the clinic's egistence will be greatly enhanced. � I have been a resident of Mendota Heights for ten years and have always enjoyed living in the community. I would greatly appreciate your consideration and positive response to this matter at the Council Meeting of April 7, 1992 at which time it is up for review. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter. ery r ly yours, I lo�" �.r-- ,. , �T' othy H.�Hanson President and CEO PLANMNG REPURT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: Lt}CATION: AGTIQN REQUESTED: Background :\t'(>i;i•f )i. i t 7 i t i:i.'t\>l!i:!'EA:t:; I'L_�NNEi:.> i.:�^<1)S(":;I'C :�RC'lill'GCT;� .stiti i�il:S'i' A\'I•.�lii[, IJl71:1"li Stl�'t i:. ?!!) \1?:•:�^:i�.-.!'(i! 14 :171i i�.1i)! {�! _� i.i•' : _i1:� 25 Febntary 1992 92-05 Centre Painte Medical Qinic 1150 �-Iighway 110 Sign Variance This apglication repre,sents the thir+d time in the past iwa years a regresentative from the G�nnt� Painte Medical C"�inic has came before the {;ity for a variance to the sign regulations in the past two years. In the previous instances the City has granted the Applicant's request The most recent of these requests was for a temporary banner sign that was attached to the top of the building. Prior to that the City approved a vari�ance for a small sign to indicate the lacation of the entry drive. The proposed sign is to be 25 feet tall from the base w the tap. The sign's surface, as indicated on the Apg2icant's drawing, wauld be appro7cimat�ely 10 feet by 10 feet with a tntal surface ar�a of 100 square feet per side. The base af the sign surface would be Iacated iS feet abave gmund level. The appearance of the si,gn, in tecros af the mat�rials used, and the design are consist�ent wiEth the sign standands established by the Yorlctan Business Park. The subject property is located within the B-1 or "Limited Business" District This district is intended for affice use including banks, clinics and hospitals. Typically, o;t'fice uses and clinics are nat as dependent on impulse customers as are retail and seivice commencial uses. Therefare, signage is not deemed as crucial far their econamic health. As a result, the signage requi�rements in the 4rdinance are somewhat mare stringent for this dist�ict than for the z�+tail commerciat districts. Sectian 25.5(13)a 1 in the Mendata Heights Zoning Ordinance limits the amount of sign suiface to SO squar+� feeG This includes bath sides of a Lwo sided sign. The agplicant is requesstinng a variance equivalent to four times the pezmitted standard. In fact, �e proposed sign would be twice as large as the largest sign permitted in the retail and industrial districts. In addition, the proposed sign is a freestanding type stnucture, Such signs are permitteci only in the retail. cammercial and industrial districts (Section 21.5(13)b). Therefore, the pmposed sign would mquire two vadances -- one for the a�a of the sign sucface and one to allow a freestanding sign in a B-1 (Limiteci Busin�ss) District Center Pointe Medica! Center, Case No. 92-OS Variance Criteria Section 5.5 iden6fies the criteria and procedure for gran6ng a variance. In order to justify the granting of a variance, it must be shown that strict enforcement of the regulations in the Ordinance would result in an"undue hardship" or "pracdcal difficulty". In this case there is a reasonable argument that, due to the extreme setback from Highway 110, a larger sign is needed to provide the site appropriate visibility for the allowed use. This same argument can be applied to the need for a freestanding sign in that any signage on this property will need to be as close to the property line as possible in order to be readable from the highway. This fact was acknowledged when the existing sign was permitted since it is a freestanding sign that exceeds the maximum surface area allowed by a factor of two. The real ques6on is how much extra surface area is enough. Unfortunately, thene is no easy answer for this ques6on. The main problem for this site is the visibility of the sign from the westbound lane of Highway 110 at the intersec6on with Lexington Avenue. The existing sign is adequate for traffic appnoaching from the west on Highway 110. However, most of the clinic's clientele probably come from the residential areas to the north, south and eask People approaching the area from the eas[ must tum left at Lexington Avenue to get t,o the clinic. This means that in onder to be able to see the sign with enough time to make the decision to tum and then get into the correct lane it must be visible from at least 1,000 feet away. Following the standards published by the sign industry for let�ering size for signs to be viewed from this distance, results in a very large sign, perhaps twioe as large as is proposed by the Applican� This raises the question of the value of allowing a sign that may not even accomplish the objective. With this in mind, it should be noted that the reason for establishing sign standa�+ds is to avoid having to live with the kind of visual clutter that would result if all signs were allowed to be designed for the worst case scenario. We have serious concems regaMing the precedent that is set by allowing a variance of this magnitude. ... . 2 One question that was asked when the previous sign variance request was reviewed by the Ciry was whether a larger sign was mally the answer to the Qinic's slow business problems. At that time it was suggested that a marketing campaign that would include printed materials with a map showing how to get to the clinic might improve business mo� than a larger sign. As indicated in the Applicant's letter, such a campaign has been initiated and with significant nesults. The City of Roseville is in the process of reviewing its sign standar+ds in nesponse to concems for excessive visual clutter. The regulafions in Roseville will respond more to specific conditions. That is surface azea will be allowed to vary depending on the type of roadway the site abuts. Similarly, maximum surface area for wall signs will vary depending on the surface area of the building. While many different solutions have been explored through this process, the general direction of the solutions is toward a surface area limit very similar to that found in the Mendota Heights Ordinance for uses of a similar nature. Action Since the signature of the adjacent property owners have been included no public hearing is requir+ed. The Planning Commission should review the ApplicanYs variance request and make a recommendafion to the Ctity Council. .o. , � raa ,au , ¢ . �� � � ' i f Z '{. • ` Q �i.)Zd �-i74 �> J � a *� FFZ A 11 K J. 1i. F ji a• t-s �. •g. K C N�r`r - �` �`� �� � 9 A�• " 1 ``� � `� ! � �_ �'�' o . � � � . ,. � �� � o . - � � ' � �� rRONTAGE ' `'_'-..� a� e� i � ,. '---- --..�f��r20q0 G'?-�.... � S7ATE TRUNK }���,}�WAY NQ. !10 i �, 1 " . ' r f�l GHT � VI��Y P I.AT C�.19-- 2 r/9 �c'j■ ✓,rc.+r.st3 Ac.c .>oc. �t1" S'bz..��-y 4 Te.c.rc..rs �. iY'•i�Ob�p HWY 11 Q `���r-�r- `� 1 '"' oi'[�Y,�,y .^�'��'C Oaa�.t' b L, m�Y l�6t .6' �„� `` , � j0 36=.� R=2T89.T9�, � r� ♦ � • 7�otti OZ E � _,6�p5^ ' d�14.4�� �7►O � � t ` � i , \ ` ;N `�� �,n..,. '.' . _t =� �3a,� ; fQo p�6 27'3� O� 6 co 'w ° R,. s� s� � -s�s. _ r -599.89- � _ ..R=�9e�.as r .. :.,s. . � � :, zs� � 'ss e� ?*�OUT�OT A °. iOQ.St .. - G:17 .._s.••r� ' . ,� � �: 32 '4,* � 3� S �r��'i ��� • "' '�� j �� Qa �6' � / �u E cs� 3 02 � 9 ,�.,yr c.�g�.�'.,�� � �'D ; 3� t 3�0 ' i�2 . /"� Q G: 8 43' S�" nfi.: ., r ., n., ..�,�y: •,�� . . ur�;- =r:� • �:. ,� .x� so �•, yr �,, ,o +va * r � o l.� r�j,'�Y,;-,.`• ' :� '` ' ,o •'??�p� � �C,�� J � 4�1 c �+ ,a �'# '�' ' M r �a � F s,r w �o � �t ^� 3 � r' � 4 � �s3 ��''q Rrssr3n � � � �� Y �,; ��„ f ' d a z 2�J , q:3 0 6p� w �+ ■ , . ^a t . � . _ '7,�''�@• � 0 M J p_s,�,; • 8.08 NBS° �5� i9'E 8 It992 ' �y ��\ _: st -688.d0 - S9 1'S19 M�"� 1 �v[}r' r y � J } ..•}f1 • 1� J iA�''�t.r••:ti4��itt�5 '- � �� � 623.7i ♦ N 88 IS i9 E . � t 4i�i r' o e � � i 4 � i-�- = SUBJECT PROPERTY pQ R T F �fl T! 2 +� NORTH � W ��'" �$CALE 1"=200' 2 a; A U QR� S SU B DI V i� O N f/ �, � •� � o� y � � a �IQ. 34, MENDOT z a W St�IJTH � -� U � cc} � go° , / 4A,`�o• ., h.� , 552.32 N83°�5'�9� ",, v NE9� 15� 19`E 688.00 , gt2„�.�• � s CENTRE . OINTE � DRIVE � ,�.�ti,2.�5 �E•� � R:36�x� . pc2��'" 50.0 �SQ.00 �50.OQ 6.o"q, tpT24 L•Z'.opU ( � 3 3. c� '� a .`F o ° I A G T pj �� 3 �L ,`rN 2 �� t � N � J� N r o � � Z 'r • a y - t„� - - 589� �5' �g"W- - t8 �9.56 - - ,��,�.r„�, 438. • 4b?5s ,� . y P„ . $� . _=, _ . _ JN ' c � l �� � rs���s°�'E � W �� J � :o M �n o 8 • �� fli � J � �; -- N M! � � : ..1 . Writer'sDirect DialNumber.• �612� 646-7266 February li, 1992 Planning Commission City Council City of Mendota Heights PLEASE REPLY TO: University Park Medical Office Building 1690 University Avenue West St Pau1,1VIN 55104 Twx (612) 646-0767 � 1101 Victoria Curve � Mendota Heights, MN 55118 RE: Sign variance(s) for Centre Pointe Clinic, 1150 Highway 110 Ladies and Gentlemen: I am writing this letter on behalf of HealthEast Properties, Inc., who purchased Centre Pointe�Clinic in Mendota Iieights in August, 1991. Towle Real Estate Company manages several medical office buildings that are owned by HealthEast in the St. Paul and suburban St. Paul area. Centre Pointe Clinic was developed by Yorkton Ltd., for opening on November 30, 1987. �The site and the building were intended to be part of a large office/industrial �'park". Therefore, the site was zoned B-1, which is different from other sites directly to the east of Centre Pointe. My understanding is that the signage guidelines for B-1 zoned properties are more restrictive. The City' of Mendota Heights did not want this commercial development to have too many large signs, making the area look like an urban city. Attached is a copy of the HGuidelines for Standardized Signage", established by Yorkton Ltd., dated April 7, 1989. Unfortunately, the development of an office/industrial park, adjacent to the Centre Pointe Clinic site, never occurred. In fact, the property went into a Receivership situation, and Yorkton Ltd. was not able to redeem it.� Ownership transferred back to the lender during the month of April, 1991. HealthEast had previously "master-leasedn the property from Yorkton Ltd. When the property ownership returned to the lender, HealthEast's only options were to negotiate a new lease arrangement with the new owner, or purchase the property. Because they had master leased the property since it's completion, •having invested time and money into it, they chose to purchase it. They acquired ownership in August of 1991. We do recognize that this is not the first time Centre Pointe Clinic has applied for sign variances. However, it is important to point out the following: 1. The existing monument sign falls within the established signage guidelines. The sign face is approximately 36 square feet, and TOWLE REAI, ESTATE COMPANY February 11, 1992 City of Mendota Heights Page 2 the height of the sign, from the ground level to the top, is 11 feet. The sign is set back approximately 3Q feet from the property line. '' � 2. The two sign variances which�were previously applied for, in early August of 1990, related to a small sign that was added near the driveway into the parking lot, identifying the _. facility as �'HealthEast Immediate Care". The variances were necessary due to the additional square feet of signage, and because the setback did not meet the requirement of the zoning ordinance. (That particular plot did not liave 30 feet of land between�the groperty line and the parking lot itself.) - - - :.• . . �- . . �. •L; � - 1. A taller sign, approximately twenty-five (25) feet from ground level to the top of the sign. 2. We are requesting�that the square footage of the sign face be increased to ten feet and one-half inch (10'1/2"j wide by ten feet (10') high, for a total of 100.4 square feet. Please note: The setback of the new sign would be the same setback as the existing monument sign. Also, we would be willing to give up the small sign identifying HealthEast Immediate Care, near the driveway into the parking lot, since "Immediate Caren would be more visible on the (proposed) new monument sign. ; . The taller, larger monument sign'is very much needed to better identify the property to passers-by on Highway 110. We reali2e that the biggest problem�with the property is that the building is set back quite a distance from the road. In and of itself, that is the problem that must be compensated for. It is important to note that 'if the development plans had taken place for the adjacent parcels, forming an office/industrial park, the Centre Pointe Clinic property would automatically have much better identification. There would be other buildings adjacent, thus more traffic in the immediate area (both from employees who would be working in the office park, and the publicj. We cannot change the positioning of the building, and we have no control over when the surrounding parcels will be developed. We also cannot change the zoning from B-1. But, hopefully, we can change the signage. If we are successful in obtaining the variance for a taller and larger monument sign, we are certain it will benefit .the property. No future signage would be necessary. _JWLE REAL ESTATE COMPANY February 11, 1.9�2 City of Mendota Heights Page 3 . Marketing is very important to any business, iri arder for it to be successful. HealthEas� has spent appraximately $110,000.00 on marketing for the property, in the past year. They have sent appraximately 1.42,000 mailers/flyers in totai, to the faliowing areas: Mendota Heights, northern Eagan, West St. Paul, South St. Paul., and Highland Park. tJn #;,hree different occasions they sen� 4�,p00 flyers, and one other �ime they sent an additional 13,000 flyers. I have a�tached copies, for your reference. You will notice that a map showing the loca�ion of Centre Pointe Clinic was included with each flyer. In addition, HealthEast has placed approximately 25 advertisements in local newspapers for the communities listed above, plus the Pioneer Press. They have held 3 open houses. � The result of the these �uarketing efforts has been ta increase the number o� patients :Eor Primary Care ( family practice ) from t1 at the beginning to 1,100 currently, and for Im�zediate Care {urgent care - evenings and weekends� �rom 0 to 450. The problem remains fihat new patients still have a very difficult time seeing where �he building is located, because the e�i.sting sign is nat visible from Highway ,110. New patients continually say that they had trouble finding fihe building. The same camment is made by residents who live nearby---they say, "I didn't know this clinic was here.TM 4nce patients find the.clinic, they dg make return visi�s. - We thank you for your considera�ion of this matter, and are hopeful that your response will be posi�ive» We are certain that if •-we are allowed to erect a tallerjlarger sign in place of the two existing sign�, no further signage will be needed. Kindest,regards, ���� . Deborah L. Je fre � Property Manager Enclosures ec: Tom WassermanjFIealthEast City o� ... ,� ,�,� � .��i�er�►dota Hei��h�s � r ;� ,�- . � APPLICAT.�ON FOR eONSIDERATION - � � OF PLANNIl�IG REQUEST . . Case No. '' t7 S Llate of Applica 'an � Fee Paid — . . ,��..�_ Applicant Name; � �"'u- �'rs t wf` (�'.� �'�-� FH: ��a ' Z ��a {Last} p�rst) {IvIl} �e �D�d cE �e.�� 1 Address: . (Number & Stre�t) (t�ty} (StaGe} �L'ip} . � � �w . QumerName: %�. � � . . ��9' � .� .,! �t c� : .�-P�. �5>03 . � „_.. . . AddL�eSs: ' � //n �i/� '��L�r/ � . �'1Y/ /1 �,.�� �- � 7%� � �f' :' +G.r� ' I'� �t .. (Ni,�i�ex&Sire�t} = . Str+eetLocation of Pr�crtp�in Qucscion: � ./ (C�iy} {Staie} �'Tg) � � � . . , . � � . , .. , : -, . ..� '- � . . � �,/ . . " • - .- - I.egal Descr�ption of Pc+operty:. ' . .. • � . , . . � . �e af R�cluesE; �"- . � � . . . . : . ;. � . .. � R�oning � : . . . � __�, Variance ' - - Cand'itiouai Use Pemxit ,. . � .. - :: Su�division Approval . � ' �� Ca�nditional Use Pemxii forP.U.D, . . . . • Wetlands Pcnmit .. . _ . . . . Plan Appivval _ ' . . . - Uthcr (auach cxplanaticmm�} : �. �. � Coi�ipreha�sivc Plan Amendmeut . � .. . . . .. ... . . . �" � - . . . . � . Applicable t�ity. f)rdinauce Number�:: �.. ::�, ` � Sectihn 4". -' . . - . �; :�' �� - . . . � - Present Zouing of T�rty _:��� Pre�e�nt Use • � 13'" � � • � . ' . Prapos�d Zoning of Prnperty �;�,� : F't�c�posed Use �;� , ...: . . - ' . } . I hemby dec�are �at all sta.temc�ts made in this r��st aud �n e additionat � = . � ' � . � � • . . . . mater�i,a1 aze true. • � . . . . . ' . � .. ' � � • ' � • � • � � ' . .. . . �. � L,�t.Ai _ ' 1 . ' ' . . , . , . • • ��� � An[ylj � � ' . . . - . --rr . . . • . . ' . . ,?�' _tt 9?i�':' � •.. . -- .. . . ._ .. � c�� . . . ���:� 1101 , � � � � � � ' - . . _ . . ... . . . ;:r: _ _ � , .. � � . 'vedhy-T'�} ,� ; ._ ' . . . ..,.: . - . � �' � .. s� " . �� .. :.� . � Hei�ht;s: �Ni.l�� �;�i'S118:.�;452=1850 � � .' :,:..-- � . � �lty oi ,,,,i1 �, � ,��,enc�ota �ei�,li�s . . SIGNATIIRES OF CONSL"'�NT �'OR "PARIANCB' RSdIIRS'�.' ' TO: The Planning Cammi.ssian, City af Mendota Heights FROM. Property 4wners of �� �-�'"�. �-ST- �a-t�"�"`� '�o��'z-'� (�lst-cQ �c.a..� C l,. �, �. c. .. . . , �: �.e vz �-v-�- t^''� t,v�, �' (�.�.�. Lw.r G( �+�• t c. - � S. 1 l C� ��.rv cu� t�.��..�' . . .,- 2.� - we �he undersigned have reviewed the • plans for ���e� �� r' w�S ��' . . � . s . and � vnderstand 'the terms . �and •. : =<� cancU.tions o .the requested variance. 'for � �- � �; � �� h � � �' � i'�za2.�' • � � ' " � a.v�� ar 5 �.ia,.� ' va.�4n.Hc.�. �I • • we nave na on� eczions �o za�.s �requesz ana av u� written cansent�and consent.to waiver of public S�.ncerely, 3 (Please Print� C. ��H i-1-�� - � � . -E. � . .�P p�e,�r- � o. v. . -�-1ti Sc�C � (J,•• L.v��rr'�!' L.s� - V� �� • . , r• � �y . g ve. our - :aring:.�.:.. - - Ann�ss {arxcL. �o�r} ,,.� t ta �V 110 ��+�.�� oi-� lf #� � M�U s,�t I�`. 300 ..�-t�. � -owc�sso (v� ��'.. �J-F". (�i�..i i �'s S i � � J�„_' j�� X � S'�` . S7o�...) { . ��o� ' ss��`f . -- _ .�� `� i . r� � .� . w�1�T �/af.liA s�fA �tIZAfA � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING February 12, 1992 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of Mendota Heights �rill meet at 7:30 o'clock P.M., or as soon as possible � thereafter, on Tuesday, February 25, 1992, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to Consider a.n application from Ms. Debbie Jeffrey, representing Health East Properties, Inc. , for a sign size variance to allow the installation of a sign at the following described property: Lot 3, Block 2, Yorkton Centre Pointe South More particularly, this property is located at 1150 • Highway 110. ' This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Such•persons as desire to be heard with reference to the �� proposed Sign Size Variance will be heard at this meeting. t,: �,. Rathleen M. Swanson City Clerk �! a EI#-2 1 —52 Ff2 = � 9= 2 8 N O R 1} (� U I S T S I G N - �� ���- � d� �1`�~ . 1 4-112` 7' 3�1/2" 1' 4-1 � • � �� �2� � �� CEl'�T�� � �--- 1 � ' I i t� i2� i � ������ ; i �. ii r� 10''' �� 1 1 ������� j I �, �� I I ���� �- 8- 2' ! 1' .�� I 1 �� 2— I I U 1� II � ' I � .l 1����.� ��t! � f 4- t i ,C�, i i g' 2= � � �x�xtec�iafie Care ; ; „ : , n Customer Ce�tt'� Potet� Medlcd Citnlc City M[neeapqiis State MN 0 Scale Noted �, Orawn ByKWC ISalesperson s� Date Z_�p-�� co _ � _ cy2��a�� 1 EL�VATION: D.F. Ii.l..UMINA't�0 CABINET 17.� sca�E: ��4•�1�-0• t/8' ALUM SNT W/ ROtl1F� Fa+GES rn�� srnE ro eE: sauv�rc�eoto AR7WORK i0 Q�: PAOVEDED FINISH 70 BE MAP#42-2'!5 BURGUNDYMl1f�0()N 3/16" ACRYLiC BACK-UA PLEX#W-7328 1' ROUT�O S�'RtPE 0.080" RADlt1S �Np A�Qi.E00NEF�S FINISN TO SE: - MAP#42-2'15 St1kC�fNDYtiRAFi00N 6'd� STO Slt PIPE �.�.r�r 1GV Y CL�aGf'{YNC � -BY OTHERS Et�C L�AD REQ'D�.fO AMPS 1'-6"d� X 8'-0• OONC F'�'G Revislons � Customer 0 0 Thk Qrawt�� ProAerqt of IYOItOCU1S'r' SlGN CO1N PANY IlY C. 312 EST LAK� STR�Et M1 NEApal.IS MN • 612• 823 7441 ^ � Yo� �� 1 �"c 690 University Avenue, S�. Patxl, Min�nesota 55104 '(612) 4�84-9000 0 •r • April 7, 1989 YORRTON CENTRE POINTE SOIITS MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN • � Guidelines for Standardized Signage The Yorkton Centre Pointe�South Development, located on Highway�110 in Mendota Heights, is developed by Yorkton Ltd., Inc. of St. Paul. � We have established some guidelines on signage for�existing and proposed buildings in order to•obtain uniformity throughout the development and�enhance'the building architecture and land- scaping. . �• 0 c . � l ;� GENERAL GIIIDELIIJ�S � 1. SIGN LOCATIONS -' � The location of each building sign shall be shown on a site plan and shall comply with setbacks es- tablished by the city. 2:�SIZE OF SIGN ' ' The size of each building sign shall comply with criteria set•forth in this guideline and with city codes. The overall size.may.be dictated by the size oE the effected building. Al.so, a certain length/ width•ratio must be adhered to. 3. SHAPE OF SIGN The,building signs shall have a vertical, horizontal, or square•shape as indicated on attached sketch. The design and shape of the ef�fected.building may dict�te which style of sign will be used.' 4. SIGN MATERIALS - Sign posts shall have round aluminum pole covers over structural tubing. The sign body shall have an al- uminum.skin with routed�•out letters and backed with _ white lumasite. � • 5. SIGN COLORS Sign posts and body shall be painted with dark burgundy, and highlighted with a white border and white letters. 6. LETTERING STYLE . Al1 lettering shall be souvenir medium or souvenir bold; 'depending on size and style on sign. Maximum height of letters shall be as indicated on attached sketch. All 'letters will be illuminated from within with fluorescent lamps. . � 0 � 7. GENERAL INFORMATION A. One sign shall be allowed for each building. In the case of multi-tenant buildings, iridiv- idual tenant signs•(which may appear on the � building sign) shall comply with these guide-, lines. ' � B. In the event that a major user occupies an en- tire building, there may be some flexibility with signage. Any request for modification to .. this guideline•will be reviewed by Yorkton Ltd., • Inc. and the city. 9 � � ' ' � . . . � � • � � ' . 0 0 • ♦ f . , . � ;� • �c�2o ce�Z� �lt.t'f"� #�.,tJ�. .��kli �-`- W t-il'C+� , � 4�At�lt��. . . :�'_-D}' i�ii�t,:' :� � : �_a, .,��X.. . �. . � � ' • � � � ����� ,. � Pdt�lT� � � X. ���tG� � � . :� ;�a a�11�� �14 � ' • - �,2t •.,ti ��-1NCV1+�. C�ri'12� �'C�1h1TE C���iG�� . �t � lGT O ��c.�.s . ............... , ' �o G � .�Olht'PE. 43ot�t.SVd�D . � . . . . � . . �� � . � . _;�4"H��N._er�.x.. � , . . .. ..._:,8� �lk�! ...MAx �..V -�"��c�L G�i"�'�. F1EjC�{-�i , ��•"��'�'�T�:�tS?LAX�:::_ ... �- �-�'t'7�.� 5���� �.�.� w�tt�r�- . . ' �uv�N 1 !�".: �.T_,(.t.,��.l..c�T.'':i�.�: � : � . � 1�U.' `GC'>U3M1.i 'GoU�LS SFU�f.� I�.�. �2" txe,t�'�:. �a.X. � -4�. . ..�AN�'T� N�tN':�.'Al..UN�.':�.... � Gol.o4� �To �� L�Al2#� �U1eGuNt7� �t� G{t�i GS �'-�'.�t2..Ma.X , �"'atC�h�C �-1:�.Ic.'a!-�'i' � >N'�i":�'CdC�:��"t�i:�tL�lNe� . .. ... ..._. . �2� 1�X t � __ �N�_...�T'a�Y t�cc.�t�tv:... , _._._._... . i�' lut�x. V�;y2,_Z`�to �1f'ot�ii��'�_...__.. ...:�':..::_ i�'�/N�.AX. 0 � ""t`'('PtG�,L .. ���t�l ....��,,c,,E �Ftb�.c.. �t�,. Ca-12k. �t3tz�t�t�t�"c13.�t�tc 1�l.Utd�,, . �1�` � l..�N �TN T� �N tTN �"Cto ""f'O �XGE'EQ 3�: j �N�.X1M.uN�.:� 50w�4uh.�.. ���T, .. ..._._._._...__._ __._.. _..,.. __...__._ .__.... . ._. . .. . , �' . X�axkta�l I3 evela�i�:e�it � . �� I690 Universfty�Avenue, Sk. Faul, MN '55I04 _ � atvtston ot C6�2)� 4$4- 900t} �" �. - YORKTQiY L't'D Inc s 0 0 ._.. . � ,- - � -� , <�:� • • ' . , .. � • . . . . , • . .. . Iv; , • . . . ' . .. �' . . . . � • ' ' "'� � .... . . . . , ' - . • . , 't ' .,:� � �r ( `. ��} • ; . . � . -, � Y : +.. • 4��{;:, , , r ' �•�••, � ..�17: s�+ " 'r .4.: �r•�� ' , I , 's � J �.�' • ^y� �� ���,.... � r�� ' �-�����''�C:'m"'�. ' "J'-r �,t��. ' ,<''�� '�. �. �.'i • ':..t7•'_•c-t-".r '' •;'�•.���:. '.�,.�'X ".'t•�!'•'��. • `;� �.9.•i.� l •��: r' 's�l• :• �::A�.:F..,:,r.'' .t� +•'a.'., ., �. '� � «r . '.t ' � - • .:•: ;'� r •'�., . .:� : �'�'�' : r,' Ti/lhT1N�s ;:. � t • �":���.. ,,,� � , '''°' .a':•: .'r.l. �1 • � �7O1tj'•.' �;' :.���E• :y �•� �+* . r';•`�, x '� '�'' �'j��� �I�bN."�•rt.�'�••�.•.,, .... :��. _ .. .`.' .' , ' t� �!�ar' � .'7u �: Eli?�•� r �,'n:{: •'i:" �,k%;�l:i^, : . :`.• ` ^ .F'.r f".i: i�`�. �t t„ �b � • i.DC!�fl , ��;`/ �•'i4.::L•. : �.��. :.� : f.,'�ya '�i�:f.i::.; . ? r•'t•.. ' x . '�;; ' ' ' � . • a•Y.'.�` � •'�/�. �1'i?��, .`,ti•' ;i. 'f, Ic.'• R, �y�J,��ez.�!�!��7 ':�;•'fI �. •.i`:. I'�. ��!� ,� •�.' .!,: 4: S.. .':'��i,,.r?: •:t��xAa''�., , '.• ., ..•..i <:••..... ' �' :�J: �•:�J • . . �i:,' ��,IJ/�: �xY`��"1.• . • .. .. 4 '�: • :\� '�•�•~,• 'y� S�bi'��li•S:iy�.Y '�y, .�..•}T •':f,lw;:� I. c;L'�.:F� .,{,: 4. i . .. . .. � . . .'�•1^{'y F.':'� .�� � w �["� .�.�'{r'ji`��1�� �..� �:1. •�i �.r : F`' , t. �' . • , . ����!i::4� � 1 ..:' :i f�,i . v��' ! � .i i . �'. .. i' � �1. •? •• 1 �• 5 C . rC.��'. � �'�.�:'.�~�. � .r :'•ri'�'�' yJ: `�' i• • • . .S"�`. :I.y��� ��`�yt.� f•`:y::••�•. .�;���a�::�•:'• ,.�..'!s � �n ';. •'`' . '�.� i•iY t.J,f,'I;t'.J�1�� ?�� ,t Y:4•; , . . '�; ; :. , .. :'�.. � ni M.l;'`=� .v �i;� � �`.j��i. ' .i Y • '���� ,• •`?•:�..rtii:'I� ��r.'!�. �tM1 �Y�.s�I �'. R"�:"•f�G�o •}�• •}�Yf, • � • �� • ' •� •� ••i,•�`' 'ry • �i• 4• •�� •(•� •f• �•�'S'•�.�yh ♦. • , 11 .Y' � �. !•. �•j�iJr� ����: . s • . . ' �,:. r .r A. . .r :R4 �. �� .� .\ ' + :� �.� ' . � M, j� � .�•,��.�� ���'� . , • �3 �.I � �: . . � .��: .;5� . �1' :��• i:. ��•� ��=:YU1 .:+;;• °•' . ' • • ' ' .. . . .: ,�e ;� • 1 � �, �`�•� •��:� H`�i��: �` , , . • .. •' • ,�: • ���� •t• y;,�� �;., . �Y•. ;� ..1�,,,; . . , .. ; s, :;� •;' � r ',�` '7 t�;'sg.: �'? .* .. . .�. . t'� � .. . , • '4: Z,''• • I.' � '•J,• � � y� ' . . ' , .. � •.�•, . ' ' ,�r. •�:4d '�' �..y. �� •: . �.. • �+- . . .,,. ,. . �„ � :.. ::. . • .f .. . . , ;�c+�� ; . . �'.. `,.. :..: ;.�; �� s•,.�:�'�.. .� � . ... �••: ..•;'�•:�,. ' • . • • . ' ..' '. , . ... . � , c;�'•,.::.; . . . ;;,�:.�. . �.. ��. c•. . . .. . . . • . h,.n�•',s3 s�r.ti.fe:%!''.e"•*'�'1tib,�I:'��� 1$ �; ; � � .? ' 1� ��:�;�s : . . :�l. � . . . . ; '�' � . l:: � � � � �:. , , . : : :. : ;:' .: � •,•�� , .; . ;.t , � t; �.; r. � . • ` C ) �.k• � ' qc � � e ' .. �.. � � � • • . • . . • / • �' . Y . 1: i �• � t � � �r�. � ` , �' � • , Z �+:^: � • . , • . . . ' : , , i, ••;••q�• •�A�;:�,• • - :;• ��" � •. . . .. � •• . . • � •, ' .. . : , ,; p�,a•y:�� . . 3 � , ?� • �5�� , • . . . . .• � .. . . • �,•. i . . , .C-"a;�<i��G. r Y`:�' ��i �{e �� �� ,~.I� . exparisiori�. � . � =-%'. �. ` ...:.,.�. 4� .���: • _ '� . . . .� - • . . ��T` '. . 1!'' t � t�.Y� .. • �: . • • . • , _ �' �.'� _; 1���. .. . . . . .. � . �: :. . . .;.:`;�-. , .:�; . : ��� . . , . : • , I. ,. � ' � • - � " . • y6 � AZ�rojL..�,•^� � . S I� 'i��'�� . • • ',NH. TUG NG.DyWt.6 � .. '� ! I . • .. � • ...• � ' ..., ►.�`, .'l:��.?. i.'•..-:��• �,c�'�� I . . _ .. . , .�, Y C';: `,,L�� ....�• • :•r.�'�";`'.:5.:,^;t,:..f�.::;�f;`. +:•».. S.:a: •,, • . I' • ' , . :. 'f.�' ; '�r�T. .:;.+�,'!t. .�:,..� • . I ,� � � '•4 • . I— — — — — — --- -'y 'o ���srnrwT .— —, � r, , . _.. .;.�'"_+: • ...� ✓ ' Q� �WO EXISTING SIGNS r y C�N�RP��NrE � M�i� C.L1NlG SR� ' �AN �s�� �/at. � ��� �� t NvAc. =NGt�o��t�_� . ' �1 • . . • • ', � . O� . . , i rs�t'1\- I 0 0 . City o� ♦ l. � . ��i�'.ilt�t3t� Hi�' 1�i1tS April 2, 1992 Ms. Debbie Jeffrey ' - Towle Rea2 Estate � University Park Medical Office Building 1694 Universit�r Avenue West � St. Paul, MN �5104 Dear Ms. Jeffrey: Your application for a sigaa si.ze variaace will be con�idered by the City Gouncil. at their ne�ct regularly �cheduled meetin.g, which will be held an Tuesdazr, Apr33. 7, 1992. The Council meeting s�arts at 8:00 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chamber�. You, or a represen�a�ive should plan on attending the meeting in order that your application wili receive Council considera�ion . The Plans=iag Commission recommeaded 5-1 that the City�Cauneil deny the requested variauces an.d direct staff to review the B-1 Zoniug District sign requirements for any appropria�e changes. If you have any questions, please feel free �o con�act me. Sincerely, ��� ���� Revin Ba�chelder Administra�ive A.ssistant RLB:kkb Snclosures; City Cauncil Agenda Staf f Memo to City Couricil 1101 Vietoria Curve - l�.endota Heights,lVlN • 55118 452 • 185Q 0 � � i�y a� .�,, , 1��endota Heights Februar�r 21, 1992 Ms. Debbie Jeffrey Towle Real Estate Universi�y Park Medical Offi.ce Huilding .� ' 1.&90 IIniversity Avenue West St. Paul, N.�I 55104 � Dear Ms. Jeffre�r: . Your application for a eiaa aize variaaGe will be considered by the Planning Conunission at their�next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday. February 25, 1992. The Planning Commission meeting starts at ?s30 o'clock P.M., here a� the City Hall in the Council Chambera. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting, in order that yaur application will receive Commission�consideration: If you have any que"stions, please feel free ta contaet me. Sincerely, Revin Ba.tchelder p►c�mi.nistrative Assista.nt KI,B : kkb Enc].osures : . Planning Commi.ssion Agenda Planner•'a Report 11(Jl Vietoria Curve •1V'�endota Heights,�1V�N • 55118 ��4�2•18v0� � . ? � T0: FROM : � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS i MEMO April 3, 1992 � �Mayor, City Council and City Administr� James E. Daniel�on, Public Works Direc o- ` Kevin Batchelde�, Administrative A sis Lawrence Shaughnessy, Treasurer � - �R SUBJECT: Building Permit and Site Plan Approval United Properties - VGC Corporation DISCUSSION United Properties has obtained a signed lease with VGC Corporation to construct a 50,000 square foot office/warehouse within the Mendota Heights Business Park (the old MAC site) to be located just north of the Lennox site. United Properties is requesting final plat approval, site plan approval, standard variance approvals, Tax Increment Financing assistance and building permit approval (see attached plans). Final Plat A preliminary plat was reviewed and approved for the entire MAC site. Final plats are being completed for the individual lots as they develop to allow for greater flexibility in designing the lots to conform to the requirements of the individual developments. This is the third final plat being completed in this fashion, the First Addition was completed for Big Wheel Auto and the Second Addition for Lennox. Site Plan A�nroval Enclosed are site plans, elevation and floor plans for the proposed VGC building. United Properties is requesting a twenty foot (20') sign setback variance, a 4/1000 s.f. parking ratio (4 parking stalls for each 1000 s.f. of office space) and 8 1/2 foot wide parking stalls. These variances have been routinely granted in the Industrial Park. The VGC project is a"fast track" project and because the variances have been routinely granted in the past, United Properties has requested that Planning Commission review of them be waived to expedite the construction start (anticipated to be on or before May 1, 1992). Park Dedication A park dedication fee was established in the Developer's Agreement to be $33,670. Payment was to be calculated and made on a pro-rated basis per acre as the land develops ($755.16/acre). This site is 4.35 acre x$755.61 =$3,287 of park dedication and would be payable before the Mayor signs the final plat. Tax Increment Financing Considerations The Tax Increment ;�id requested (see attached letter of request) is for approximately $270,000 of front enc� money for acoustical building ma.terial and site improvements, wi't'h $335,000 as a"pay-as-you-go" revenue note against the project: This is structured in the same manner as the Lennox project. The note portion is payable solely from the project taxes as collected. Building Permit United Properties has submitted the required plans for building permit review; site plan, elevations, floor plan, landscaping and grading plans. A staff review of these plans finds them to be acceptable. ACTION REQIIIRBD Meet with the Developer and discuss their proposal. Consider motions of approval for the following items: " 1. Final Plat approval for Mendota Heights Business Park 3rd Addition (subject to receipt of Park Dedication fee) . If Council desires to approve the final plat, they need to pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 92- , 2. Site Plan approval including variance requests. If Council deaires to implement United Properties request to waive Planning Commission review of their three standard variances, Council should pass a motion waiving Planning Commission review and approving variances as follows: a. 20 foot sign setback variance (40' required) b. 8 1/2 foot parking stall width (9 ft. required) c. 4 parking stalls/1000 s.f. of office (5/1000 required) 3. If Council desires to implement the Tax Increment Financing assistance, they should authorize preparation of a Developer's Agreement modeled after the Lennox Agreement. 4. Council needs to review the building, landscaping and grading plans and if acceptable, authorize staff to issue a building permit. JED/KLB:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAROTA COIINTY, MINNESOTA RESOLIITION NO. 92 - RESOLIITION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR ,� MENDOTA HLIGBTS BIISINESS PARR 3RD ADDITION � , . ,. . , �. � WHEREAS, a final plat for Mendota Heights $usine�s Park 3rd Addition has been submitted to the City Council of t7ie City of Mendota Heights; and ' WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights has reviewed said final plat, and NOW THEREFORE IT IS SEREBY RESOLVTsD by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the final plat of Mendota Heights Business Park 3rd. Addition submitted at the meeting is hereby approved. � 2. That the appropriate City Officials be and they are hereby authorized to execute the final plat on behalf of the City of Mendota Heights. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 7th day of April, 1992. • CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor •? .. . UNITED PF�OPERTIES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY April 1, 1992 . � �. Mr..M. Thomas Lawell City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55118 RE: VGC CORP. (VGC) Mendota Heights Business Park (Acacia) Dear Tom: United Properties Development Company requests the approval of the City of Mendota Heights for a building permit and variances subject to staff's approval of final plans and specifications for the proposed VGC building. As requested, we have included 10 sets of the site plan, building elevations, floor plan, grading plan, landscaping plan, and final plat for the referenced project. The proposed project will be located on approximately 4.35 acres at the northwest corner of Pilot Knob Road and Commerce Drive, across Pilot Knob Road from the Big Wheel/Rossi building. The architectural design of this building will include painted architectural masonry block and precast Fabcon panels, glass and extensive landscaping. The building will consist of approximately 50,000 square feet of building area. VGC's parent company is VRG-Group, a conglomerate headquartered in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. This Dutch company's primary business lines are paper, business systems, and graphic systems. VGC is within the graphic division. The proposed facility will consolidate two existing operations, currently located in Mendota Heights and Minneapolis, into one building. The new building will provide general office, light manufacturing and distribution operations. VGC is a supplier of printing and graphic arts products to the printing industry. We are delighted to keep this outstanding company in Mendota Heights. VGC will own the building upon completion. They project having 58 employees. Time is of an essence for this project which is being developed on a fast-track basis for a December 1, 1992, occupancy. In addition to the building permit approval, we request the following variances for a 4/1,000 s.f. of office area parking ratio for purposes of calculating the number of required parking spaces; for 8'6" parking stall width; and for a 3500 West 80th Street Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55431 (612) 831-1000 :� Mr. M. Thomas Lawell April 1, 1992 Page 2 20' property line setback off of Commerce Drive forthe tenant identification sign (standard MHBP�design). These variance requests have been approved in the past by you for the Mendota Heights Business C.ent�r, Southridge B�s?ness Center, Northland Insurance Company, Solvay, Big Wheel and LENNOX projects. In addition; we have� requested TIF Support, as described in a letter to Larry Schaughnessy dated March 2,�1992. We sincerely appreciate your consideration of these requests. Very truly yours, Dale J. Glowa Senior Vice President DJG/vmr Enclosures �:\`�1,�f /�% _����`, %�/;; � ���A��;��il - _�-`�C ;�i` , � � • � � / � � � �� March 2, 1992 � Mr. Larry Schaughnessy � ,�� City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 RE: VGC CORP. Mendota Heights Business Park (Acacia) Dear Larry: United Properties Development Company requests City approval for Tax Increment Financing (TIF) support for the above referenced project in the form of up front cost write-downs and a"Pay- As-You-Go" benefit totaling approximately $610,000. As you know, the "Pay-As-You-Go" benefit is secured by a limited revenue note befin►een the City and the owner (VGC). On behalf of VGC, we request receiving a"Pay-As-You-Go" benefit over the remaining term of the tax increment district for this project. We estimate the net present value of the "Pay-As-You-Go" benefit over the remaining life of the district to be approximately $340,000. This assumes a 50,000 square foot building generating $1.61 per square foot of real estate taxes when fully assessed. I have attached a schedule prepared by the Publicorp, bond consultants, calculating the "Pay-As-You- Go" benefits over the remaining TIF District term. The balance of TIF support, $27A,000, will be paid up front as cost write-downs. At your request, I have prepared the schedule below outlining estimated project costs which are allowable tax increment write-downs. The land write-down represent the difference beiween the current market value and our original purchase price. Acoustical Building Materials: Land Write-down: Site Work: Tree Removal Grading Utilities Curb and Gutter Paving Sidewalks Engineering Costs TOTAL 3500 West 80th Street Suite 100 330,000 5,000 25,000 2G,000 5,000 30,000 5,a�0 10,000 $610,000 Minneapolis, MN 55431 (612) 831-1000 � / Mr. Larry Schaughnessy March 2, 1992 Page 2 As you know, the real estate market has slowed to a near standstill. with existing properties, we had to offer VGC the TIF suppor#. We Council` approval. ;. . � Sincerely, �X. �.�i�--. . , � . r' Gc, (�G`�.--- Dale J. Glo Senior Vice President DJG/vmr Enclosure In order to be competitive respectfully request City `�. F i ,J�' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 3, 1992 T0: � Mayor, City Council and City Administrat r �'' � FROM: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist��.'' .;. �,. SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 92-02: The Rottlund Home Co. Rezoning to HR-PUD, Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, Sketch Plan Approval and ' Subdivision Approval INTRODIICTION The Rottlund Homes' Winterwood proposal is requesting a rezoning to HR-PUD, a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, Sketch Plan approval and Subdivision on approximately 10•acres of land in the southeast corner of Mendota Heights Road and Dodd Road. Mr. Todd Stutz and Mr. Don Jenssen, of Rottlund Homes and their legal counsel, Mr. John Bannigan have appeared at public hearings at the February and March Planning Commission meetings. The public hearing was continued from the February meeting until the Ma.rch meeting to allow the developer time to provide additional information, or respond to stated concerns, as requested by the Planning Commission at the February meeting. _ Attachments Included in your packet for review are the following items: 1. Application, notice materials and Planner's Report da�ted - February 25, 1992, based on the original set of plans. 2. Full size copy of the revised set of plans dated March 18, 1992, that Rottlund Homes submitted in response to the Planning Commission's requests at the February meeting. A reduced set of plans and a Rottlund Homes brochure are also enclosed. 3. Staff inemo to Planning Commission dated March 20th which includes March 2, 1992, letter to Rottlund Homes outlining the Planning Commission's February requests and � reports from the Fire Chief and the Police Chief regarding Winterwood proposal. - �` � 4. A March 17, 1992, letter from Rottlund Homes responding � to the Planning Commission's request which included a _ reduced set of revised plans, a soil conditions report, a letter from Mr. Richard Putnam requesting sketch plan approval for a child care center land use on Outlot A, a_. purchase agreement copy and a sound transmission test report for the proposed construction materials. �. A Ma.rch 31, 1992, letter from Rottlund Homes that responds to the;Planning Commission's Motion for Denial. ,� 6. The Planning Commission minutes from their E bruary 25, 1992, and March 24, 1992, meetings are also �nclosed in your Council Agenda Packet. ; 7. A copy of proposed covenants and declarations have been submitted but are not attached due to its length. They are availa.ble upon request should you deaire to review them. DISCUSSION Rottlund Homes is proposing to develop a ten acre site located at Mendota Heights Road and Dodd Road as a multi-family townhouse project consisting of 68 units. The units are proposed to be a back to back style townhome and are marketed to an empty nester age bracket . The 68 units are proposed to be in seven S unit buildings and one 12 unit building. The existing zoning is R-1, Single Family Residential. The developer is requesting a rezoning that is consistent with the existing Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of HR-PUD. Please see attached February 25, 1992, Planners Report for a more detailed review of the proposal. Rezoninct The developers are requesting a rezoning from R-1, Single Family Residential to HR-PUD, High Density Residential Planned Unit Development. The HR-PUD designation follows the guidelines and regulations of the R-3 Zoning District. ' CUP for PUD The applicants have submitted materials for both the sketch plan and the final approval for the townhouse portion of the Planned Unit Development. Outlot A is proposed to become a day care center and the developers are only seeking sketch plan approval for this use at this time. Once a day care provider has been selected, the developer will return for final Planned Unit Development review and approval under the Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development guidelines and process. � r � ' Subdivision A preliminary plat has been submitted for review and approval. (See sheet 4 of 9 on revised plana dated Ma.rch 18, 1992). The .. proposed plat includes 8 lots, one for each building, one outlot, Outlot A, for the proposed day care center, and an exception in the northwest corner owned by Mr. Carl Case. The exception is a small parcel remaining after highway acquisition and is too small to be developed by itself. ; � �: Parks � , :,; City policy is to have recommendations from botli advisory bodies on Subdivision proposals prior to Council action. This proposal has not yet been to the Parks and Recreation Commission for their review and recommendation. The developer is proposing a cash dedication that would be based on a formula of $750 per unit for a total of $51,000. The Council ma.y wish to refer this to the Parks and Recreation Commission for their review at their April 14, 1992, meeting. The Planning Commission voted to recommend that City Council deny this proposal based on a long list of Ordinance citations . Rottlund Homes has responded to this motion of denial with a letter addressing each point of the motion, dated March 31, 1992. Please see motion in the recommendation below and the attached letter. RECONIl�I�TDATION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that City Council deny the proposal based on the following motion: Commissioner Friel moved to recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development, the rezoning to HR-PUD, and the Sketch Plan approval for the following reasons: 1. The proposal does not meet the criteria for a Planned Unit Development set forth in Sections 13 and 22 of''the Zoning Ordinance in that it does not: a. preserve the natural and scenic qualities for open areas, b. limit development to a scale appropriate to the existing terrain and surrounding land use, c. result in an effective and unified treatment of the development possibilities on the project site, or d. harmonize with the existing and proposed development in the areas surrounding the site - and in fact, instead of preserving open areas and natural ' and scenic qualities, the proposed Planned Unit _ Development diminishes open space and maximizes densities � by utilizing unsafe private streets of inappropriate widths, the consequences of which is to have a result .. entirely opposite that which is contemplated in the utilization of a Planned Unit Development. �. The Planned Unit Development does not meet the definitional re�uirements of Section 22.1(a) and (b). ,ti 3. The granting of the Conditional Use Permi r�,q�ested would have an adverse and detrimental effe�t upon the health, and on existing and future occuparits of surrounding lands. It will seriously depreciated surrounding property value and the project is not therefore in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City Zoning Ordinance and, in particular, does not meet the requirements for a Conditional Use Permit specified in Section 5.6(5) of the Zoning Ordinance. In particular, the private streets have the potential of crating health and safety problems, as evidenced by the concerns expressed, among others, by the reports of the fire and police departments of the City, even though it is recognized that apparently some changes were made in the plans in response to those reports. 4. The proposal before us fails to meet the following specific requirements of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances of the City, among others a. Outlot A, which calls for a`day care center, does not meet the one-acre minimum specified by Section 7.2(8) or in the alternative there is an inconsistency between the site description and dimensions contained in the plans presented by the developer and the developer's Ma.rch 17, 1992, letter. It fails in other respects as well to meet the requirements of Section 7>2(S) of the Zoning Ordinance in that the applicant is lacking evidence of registration with the State of Minnesota as required. b. The streets are private streets and are 24 feet wide instead of the minimum of 30 feet required by Section 5.3(a) of the Subdivision Ordinance. Private street width provided for by the developer is the width permitted for private driveways only. It appears that the use of private streets was apparently utilized as a means to maximize housing units in the proposal and minimize open space, which is entirely inconsistent with the purposes for which a Planned Unit Developinent is permitted, particularly on such a small site. Such streets > also have the potential �or creating publ.ic safety problems because af problems related to maintenance and. snow remaval. c. The Site Developmen� Plan �ail� to comply with Sections 5.6(2)b6, 7 and 8; 5.6(2)c3, 4 and 5; � 5.7{3}a6, 7 and 8; 5,7�3}b3, 4 and 5; 22.5(1} and � 22.4(4)d with respec� to Outlot A; and in general , wi�.h Section.s 5.6 {2) d6, 5.6 (2) e3, 5.7 (3) c6, j 5.�(3)d3 a�d 12.5(7}. � �� i d. The proposed parking out�ide, o�'f s�.re��. �ails to comply wi�.h Sectian Z2 . 5(2 ). ''' i 5. e. There is no public street abutting Lots �2, 3 and 5 as required b� Sec�.ion 3.2(65) of the Zoning Ordinance. f. The covenants of the Hameowner's Associa�ion wha.ch provides �or ren�al of �he uni�s i� inconsistent wi�h representation that these units are "for sale" units. g. Traffic s�.udies care center Development. have not �aken into account �he day traffic of the Planned Unit The motion was amended to include �hat the proposed plan doe� not reflect open apace area �ar both children and pedestrian travel; tha� the plan fails to comply with the requirement o� fencing as required by the Zaning Ordinance, on the north side of the property; that private driveway leng�h should be much 1es� than 500 feet. - Review �.he appla.cation and proposal with �he Rattlund Iiomes representatives . If City Council desa.rea to imp].ement the Planning Commi�sion`s recommendation., they should pass a motion directing sGaff to prepare the resolution of denial based on appropriate findings of fact. � Rottlund, Inc., Case No. 92-02 .` -� _ Page 3 Landscaping � A significant amount of landscaping is proposed for the site as part of the project, which is indicaterl on the landscape plan. Generally, the proposed landscaping meets the requirements of the recently revised landscape standards in the Ordinance. The size of the trees and shrubs indicated on the plans meet or exceed those required. The selected species, spacing of plants and plant massings are all acceptable. There are four small pazking areas along the south side of Mendota Heights Road, which should be screened with additional shrubs. The retention pond in the northeast comer of the site could also be "' planted� in more of a park-like manner. This depression does not need to be delineated and trees could be planted in the low azea as long as th�y are species that can tolerate intermittent wet conditions. While the plant species and massing are generally acceptable, the overall scheme of t�e plantings is somewhat random. The appearance of the •landscaping would be stronger if areas were planted with clusters of a single species. �_ • The site unprovements also include landscaped berms along Mendota Heights Road and adjacent to the . freeway ramps. The berms adjacent to the freeway ramps behind the three units on the east end of the property aze very small due to the close proximity of the access drives for these units. These berms are intended to help atxenuate the noise associated with the accelerating and decelerating traffic on the ramps. One factor that reduces the needed height for these berms is that the ramps aze depressed 12 to 16 feet below the elevation of the subject property. However, the berm adjacent to the twelve-unit building in the southeast comer of the site offers little screening or noise attenuation for that structure. Bulk Regulations The proposed project meets or exceeds all of the densiry, setback and building spacing requirements in the R-3 district. There are no height limitations in this district. The density of the project (7.1 units/acre) is within the eight units/acre identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed density also satisfies the minimum lot azea standard in the R-3 District as required by Section 13.2(2). Parking The parking provided for the project exceeds the minimum requirements in the Ordinance. Section 12.5(1) requires 2.5 pazking spaces per unit of which one must be enclosed. This translates to 170 stalls for the 68 units proposed. The project would provide 197 spaces, if we assume one parking space in the driveway of each unit (the developer assume� one space in front of each garage). The project also meets the 40-foot minimum setback to pazking wherever parking is adjacent to a public street. Also, the proposed driveway width of 24 feet is consistent with the Ordinance requirement. One issue related to the on site circulation is the fact that some of the end units are located on very long access drives. This is due to the shape of the property and the desire to avoid orienting all of the buildings with the ends facing Mendota Heights Road. The longest of these drives, as measured from the cul-de-sac, is roughly 400 feet. If we include the length of the cul-de-sac, these units aze 660 feet from the public street. We would suggest that the City's fire chief review the site plans to ensure _ adequate access for emergency vehicles. " ' Utilities The City's engineering staff has reviewed the drawings for the proposed project and has determined that the existing utiliry mains in the area are adequate to serve the development. The Applicant will have to petition the Ciry to extend those utilities to serve the site. � _ �. Rottlund, Inc., Case No. 92-02 The developer has worked with the City and removed four units from their original plans to accommodate the storm retention pond found in the northeast comer of the site. This pond has been adequately sized. Miscellaneous The City has no plans for a park in the aze�of the subject properiy, therefore, a cash dedication fee will have to be established. This fee is typically calculated at $750 per unit. Page 4 The drawings and other materials provided by the applicant meet the requirements for submission for subdivision with the exception of a soifsurvey. Section 4.1(2)g of the Subdivision Ordinance requires a soil survey as part of the preliminary plat process. This information should be provi�ied pzior to the approval of the preliminary plat. A tree survey is also required for the preliminary plat review, however, since there are no trees on this portion of the property this requirement can be waived. Action The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing and consider the criteria for rezoning, conditional use permit for a planned unit development and the sketch plan criteria for subdivision through the PUD process. // � � � i 'i J � ^ , '1 • • • t ` ' � ;1, V � ;, + � „'r.4}t ,�� L- • I i � • ' ( �� • � ri5e Y` � _ '_ Cy�_ � � • + � �f � � - �� . . .. .� �--,-,� a T A E H 1 G W A Y . g ,,� ,� `"' -----._._ � � -�;,�. ---�-.t—._,_,_-- _._ p � � _,�,� � .�..� � '' � I �z: s . ( , �' j • , ��,� MENDAKOTA GOLF COURSE 6� C0� NTRY GlUB ���.: �..r� ; ''�'� � � ,�� � �+ ( PRIVATE) � °'�'��" �� , � I � (z �«�� 3 � - �.,�.I � �y ,• i— �� • •_ 1 .. � _ _ � a � _ � -1 —' \� ,m�j �"— ' . - "' _ `..�? __ La , =--�s � � � � �ooaGE `��._ S-� i aaTusE � � r:>'I:r.�.:::::•. � s • • s • • • ♦ � y - _ �!lr=.,r�.....__..� •, �� � • ._ - _ '1�-•.�,.'._.,.. ,�', .J � . -' _ _ ..�... �� e i .• • s si• t � O � ' _ _ .L.'� _ _ '� FM! i _ _ �'_ _ • ; .. � . � � ♦ • • • � `M " -. . _ _ \ �+� � = ��2-+ • • r • ♦ s - • ' ' t - - •:. .' k . . . • •:'�`�.� � f" _�_ �� • - :•.;_ . - : J„%'- _ _ — • d I � � , t ' ` +�L, � � . � � /1 •L f � • � ` Y� � 1 � � :a I � • � ' � T � _ � - �„ • _� � •• - � � �� _ - . .% PpRX �. � � '. % � - _ • i � t' a %:�s' � - •- � _ - "• } •T.': - .. _ ( � 5�i 7t5 MM[R '� �a �.. ••_• i I � ��� ;: � � :' . ` 51N�STATIOM • • • �" � � ' - �� � ' • •� � � � �W1/EN CO. AStYfMT ' � ^ _=L � a L � '� • • '• _ ' � 'r- - _� � � _ _ N Y . MARSH ` I � • • • • • - R') � , ti ` • ! �`' � , '� - - -PARK • - � .� �' • ' • = �r� • „ � � s + • • C� � - • • � . • • < �• � • •-• . _. , � • . . - ' _ ��-.� • • ^ ' __ -- � � • . f • �• • �'� • � � � � � �� � � � � ' � � + ` • • \� ��� � � • ���' � `f ♦ • • • • • � ' . � Ir ��•r�r � i . . -— — . . . . . .. �. .. �, '.. •, • . ..�.,, f! �. _'— . . . • . ' • . � • . � ..�- "-� . .. - _ - . . . . . . . , . . , .. t, . : ' . .�� � . •�. � _ -: i.; __. _ . _ }� � . • . . .., . . � • . __ _ _ j .'. . �-,;..��'_ . .. — ,�fi. . . �' � • ' . - • S• . . — ���jj� �� � � � � ♦ • • � • • • • • • � • � � � � • • • ' ` � • • � • • • • � � � �• y � Q�V ♦ � • � � q � � '��� � ' - _ • 11 . , � � � , y • , .� •- �• ` ' _ • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ • • '� ,� i • " * • • • • � ' � • • s , » ! • • QP¢ / _ . �� _ • • • • �/ � • • • • • • • • • � � _ � • • • • • s • a . � . • i � ^' _ - ,K '� • • . '`� U 1 V ' -= ' � - . . . . . . . T� ''' � �--� `�� y��'� » ra, _,�,,� �— -.�-: � !�y-. — - - • • e • • • /.,� , • • ` Q • ! "A• I �� • s • 1 � ' / � ''_ —�— . • • . • • s j . �'• • ' r � • • . - . . . � . s • '• �. •� 9 1 0 ` � • - • . s s � � � 1 � ♦ • �pa� ' � `t_.' W • • _ � � • • i � � • / 1 f _ •. � t,C +,� r../� � � • • m • s i �� � ` + • -�,� `Q � � � _ ') �'r e • .. R � �� •�• �♦ � i � • � � �.�` = J,. • � • • • •li� � � � _ ! "t s l� / � I � , ' `, _ • • "'� APA a • ♦ — - ,� : • • �- ^, � � _ � ! . . .� _ _ � � � • • . ` • � � — . . '>> .o -1 r - �-; �--- - � `' _ _, � , � t� �4, ' , • �,, � -� � • • Qe�oa+eo .. • � f l/ // � • t. �wEll � �0 1 • • • • {� !_v / I * ` ' � � � � • i�� �j� /� � � j � ' • ! - : xzTw ,1' `'+ � ` • ( (` t1 TlIE COlIYENi! KMEYY !"\ � I'*. !� )) t _ `1, '1 i� .��,. � W iH[ WSIT��qN {`. � ` t� 1 71 . < • r Ji � ive.cw�isscwai - ��.. y .� 1 � z .. 1 - i �, • �% � � `.itew ( � `, \ � \•„ � � � c�_` �f o'' " (� r' •,,,�vi=,_=. � aon' �„ a - � • �`• � : f tl W . , - ;� {o , �j �,� � g , � � ` i f � _ \,�¢ 'a� a \�/ � _ 'c w d � , ��1-1{�`��/ '� 5�Q t 'w • m 7 �' `� ° �r�t�. � V � �-~_ � �O1 " �EIGHTS RQAQ Z f .:�r:'r3��:�:$•:.:;}:t:�>5'?:;jj �,i�� ``"l-�" j o r � �t:;;;:>:`�''v::.::. � � -` �� ::��:�:'�'= �Y ��e' p � � � � ; Q:;{;`.•: : f:;:;:;:}�:� i: }: /� i.!�^�. .+1�/�� T - "!^ I �a C�I '��::::' :�:{::�;�::�:::�:::�'�::::{:.:. SUBJECT PRC?PERTY `4 � :::::::::::: , � � x , ::.::.;:.»:::>:..:::::: � : ���.r::::::: �' � ` � �1 � _ �, � � , ,�+� ` , NORTH f , _ � �`, 1 � SC�iLE i "=80t}' ! ,� SCHooL pIST. IVo. �9� J J y3 A�. �6 1 I 6 - , o � ,_ � , � �-�� � 010-79 � a ' ioco � • w � r��o � P � . � _Q a� � � O j O . p^ .. US /O V „ /� ��. � M J J I � P I � ' �� / NCi � `� Qa QI y U �- ` � � i � O 6,�� qb�� 7n � �\ 2� `'!� ti?Z� i ' �Nm ' ,(�° ..:'P� a P �{; . � � n � ,p c�. p.Z1 � ' `t. . N App ry P�ijY . 20AZ+S�ili2�-� - �2q��JT.•B79tl•��•� M yP�`. q:�2� 79 u4�� � 0�23q.q � . •s.BP2222CAtS0�l3'IY,.'�• ••�,fl97 a4�30i�� SS�.S2 AZ'e� �22 �(�9 al� 653.R'�596.62 364.84 AZ=89°2426 ,.o �` 29o.ss :..�Z-e�Ca,2-% pZ\O C.4Z=97a�.,� 0.37 AZ=179°23�24��, d� 737.80 269°24 26•• .°D .r80.00AZ=359P23'24' pE A A � C� �' i; ,:•. Bi2.07 e'.269'2: R�o3o_L1 �, 'S�b.984Z-26�Ptj71�•20,60'� �� '`�•li�304:i79°7�'_fi ASr. ~ AZ=359'7'i; 'Oil' MO At=l.b'9'D2 •� N O i/17—d v c+ � . � �a �� m. F/Yl ic kc Iso» � A � a 2!v/38-A - 470.i6 AZ:30'06a8" - •- 33g93 , 174�-5� C=33p ° 2s.sl� � . ..r . 3/ C q2= ��2. �'' b9°/9'�. 'D`ej2l+ SUBJECT PROPERTY ,o� ?�s ,,, 7 ,st�. i �a� f NORTH � �;��s� SCALE 1 "=200' ���.. .�a . s,,',�,. ��.e " 2 �o9s ��ss P� , c�r. �/- ✓��%9 � F O � H - 33� 57 AZ:89�24'36" � . �M ^'Oi � 0 . - AA N O� � N � I // � � . i�l � , { / I N � ' N �� � a � N o � s - � M r.i / ` � w Q � �O �. R q� �. � �Y T �m � q � � �, �° /0 � N '� T � NO � �9; , � � � i�y a� .�.�,�:,� 1��.endota H�ights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION PLANIVING REQUEST , , ' Case No. Q�" Q � ' ' Date of Application - . i t _ • + l• � Fee Paid �,��tfl� ��� • : ; ; ' 'I �� ,.. AppIicantName: _The Itottlund Company, Inc pg, 612 �71--03Q4 (I-ast) (F'vrst) (M� , . A���; 'S201 East River Road - Suzte•301, Fridley, Minnesota 55421 tNwnt�r & Sa�et} (city) <Srace} (Zip} OwnerName: R.A. Pu�nam & Associates � (Last) {F'irsc) {Mt} Addr�s: 2765 Ca'sco Point Raad, Wayzata, Minneso�a SS39i . �� • � (Number & Strcet} � . (City) � � (state) . fZip) Street Lacation of Praperty in Questiou: Mendota Heights Raad & Dodd Road � Legal Description of Property. See Attached � Type of Request: �,_, Rezonang .,��C3 � . . Cc�nditional Use Pernlit � Conditional Use Permit for P.0 D: �� �,_ Pian.ApProval - Camprehensive Pian Amendment Varian.ce � - " __��___ Subdivision Approval--�j�J�. � Wetlands Pemiit . Other (attach explanation) Apglic,�ble City 4rdivance Number 401 Section 22 .. Present Zoning of Prc�perty R-1 Pnesent Use Q�en • I' •.� •� •� �� � ' •�- .1� ' 11 ' �.• -� .•��•a� r. n I herehy declare that a11 statements made in this reque material are trcie. � i1Q1 Victoria. ,Curve •,tVi.endota Heights, .1Vi�N • 55118 � �� � � 452•185tM CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING February 4, 1992 , TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: ; �6���' ;� . NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission �$ •Ni�ndota Heights wi11 meet at 8:00 o'clock P.M., or as soon as .possible thereafter, on Tuesday, February 25, 1992, in the City Hall`Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from The Rottlund Company, Inc. for Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development and Subdivision at the following described property: .AI1 that part of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 35, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, which lies Easterly of the centerline of Dodd Road, except and reserving therefrom the East 220 feet of the South 660 feet and also excepting the following described tract: Commencing at the intersection of �the North line of said SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 35 with the centerline of Dodd Road; thence East 14 rods; thence South 6 rods; thence West to the centerline of said Dodd Road; thence North along said centerline of Dodd Road to the place of beginning; ALSO the West 460 feet of the North 660 feet to the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 36, Township 28 North, Range 23 West; EXCEPT that portion of the aforesaid �tracts of ].and taken by the State of Minnesota for highway purposes. � More particularly, this property is located at the southeast -� corner of Mendota Heights Road and Dodd Road. This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance Nos. 301 and 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development and Subdivision wi11 be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk 6 � .. � =1�3t` C�� ,�,..� .,� . 1��,e�data Heights Februar�r 21, 1992 .Mr. Wayne Tower Pioneer Engineering , " 2422 Enterprise Drive ��. t Mendota Heights, NIlJ 55120 Dear Mr. Tower: � 'Y'our applicatian for a COP for PtTD, Rezan3ng and Svbdiv3sion will be corisidered by the Planning Commission at their n�t regularly -scheduled meeting, which will be held an Tuesda�,, February 25, 1992 . The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 0' clock P.M. , here at the City Hall in-the Council Chambers. You, or a representa�ive should p1a.n on attending the meeting, in order that your application. will receive Comma.ssion consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Revin Batche3der Ac�ministrative Assistant KLB.kkb Enclosures; Planning Commission Agenda Planner•'s Report _ ec: Todd Stutz The Rottlund Company, Inc. 5201 Fast Ttiver Road, Suite 301 . � Fridley, NIl�i 55421 a 1101 Victoria Curve • 14�iendata Heights, 1V�N • 55118 .452 • 1854 r � C ity o� ...� . 1Viendota Heights April 2, 1992 Mr. Todd Stutz ' Executive Vice President The Rottlund Homes Co. 5201 'East River Road, Sui,t�e 301 Fridley, MN 55421 , ��:�� ' ` Dear Mr. Stutz: � •� ' `�'�''� Your application for a Rezoning, Conditional IIse Permit for Planned �IIait Development aad Subdivisioa will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, April 7, 1992. The Council meeting starts at 8:00 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a , representative should.plan on attending the meeting in order that your application will receive Council consideration . The Planaing Coaimission recommeaded 7-0 that the City Council deay the request for Rezoning, Conditional IIse Permit for Plaaned IInit Development and Subdivision. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ��vvv` Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb Enclosures: City Council Agenda Staff Memo to City Council cc: Mr. John Bannigan Bannigan and Relly- � Attorneys at Law 409 Midwest Federal Building Fifth and Cedar Streets - St . Paul , MI�T 55101 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 5v118 452 • 1850 � JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. PATRICK J. KELLY JAMES J. HANTON JANET M. WILEBSKI JOHN W.'QUARNSTROM BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING ; 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 (612) 224-3781 .. , v March 11, 1992 'Tlie Honorable Tom �.awell Mendota City Heights City Manager c/o Mendota Heights City Hall 1101 Victoria C'�rve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Lawell: FAX (612) 223-801 9 ; , :,. RE; Application for Rezonin� Conditional Use Permit for PUD and Plan Approval/Southeast corner Mendota Heights Road and Dodd Road This is to advise that the undersigned law firm has been retai.ned by The Rottlund Company, Inc. to assist it in its Application for Consideration of Planning Request dated February 4, 1992. Please copy the undersigned with any notices of hearings by the Planning Commission and/or City Council that deal with the consideration of our client's application. I am looking forward to working with you and your staff. I am confident that we can achieve a result which will be yet another asset for your fine community and a profitable and prideful project for our client. JB:cge C: Mr. Todd M. Stutz Mr. Richard A. Putnam Mr. Thomas Hart Sincerely yours, � � 4 � � t � �� �.�I't,l(�.f't�1 0� � � � � � aqa Menc�ot-� 'rIeights Planning Co�nmission 1101 Victoria Dr. i�enclota �ieights,Ml�t F�R. 21� '92 � � • r�' :2e: 'i'he r�zon•ing ot the prop�rty at the Southea�t corner of Mendota Heic�hts i:d, and Dodd Rd. �'' . . . �. ._ .. srb:�e tv.i.3_]_ aaQ. i1�.3:��.�_ .'r_� .�tte;.ic�..t.he .h��ri.n�� �;�'� s_n- reb. ' 25�ch as v�e will �be out of town, iioc�ever, �ve �vi�h to est�ress our c�esire to hav�s this particular. piece oi propert�y reserved for sinc�le family homes rath�r than rezoned for to�vnhouses or apart�ents. Mendota Heights already has a sufficent num;�er of apart;i►ents and townhomes. To insure that current r�sidents continue to enjoy the highest quality of cominunity life, t�his property MUST �TOT be used for townnome�. `1,Yi°ari�C `You �Cenneth and Gloria Severson �'%�vx�R'2 .�''^ _J���(Q-C.� 2��6 Westview lerrace Mendota Heights, Mn 55120 637 0754' � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO � T0: Planning Commis�ion March 20, 1992 FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: CASE N0. 92-02: The Rottlund Homes - � Continued Public Hearing INTRODIICTION The Rottlund Homes' Winterwood proposal requesting a rezoning to HR.-PUD, a CUP for PUD, Sketch Plan approval and Subdivision appeared before the Planning Commission on February 25, 1992. That public hearing was con�inued until the March meeting to allow the developer's time to provide additional information as requested by the Planning Commission at that hearing. DISCIISSION After the hearing, using the meeting minutes, staff compiled a list of questions, that were asked to be addressed by Rottlund Homes. That list was then distributed to each of the Planning Commission members for their review before it was submitted to Rottlund. Mr. Todd Stutz, representing Rottlund Homes, then met with Planner Malloy, Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder and Public Works Director Jim Danielson, where each of the points were reviewed (see attached letter dated Ma.rch 2, 1992). The Police and Fire Department reports, based on the original plans, have been submitted since the Planning Commission meeting (see attached written reports). We have reviewed the information submitted by Rottlund and have found that they have addressed each of the items requested by the Planning Commission, either in the narrative or the revised drawings. In your packet you will find a full size set of revised plans dated March 18, 1992, a cover letter and narrative from Rottlund Homes, which includes as attachments a reduced set of plans, a soils condition report from Braun Engineering, a letter from Mr. Richard Putnam addressing site ownership and Outlot A, a sound transmission report and a declaration of covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements. • - � Based on one of the recommendations of the Fire Department, Rottlund Homes has revised the site plan to link the two sections with a loop road. This plan has been submitted to John Uban, who will be prepared to discuss any revisions in setbacks, etc., due to this realignment. ACTION REQIIIRED Conduct the continued public hearing and make a recommendation to tYie City Council on the proposed Rezoning, Conditional Use . Permit for Planned Unit D�'crelopment including Sketch Plan approval and Subdivision. . +� : ,; • Mr. Putnam has requested that his proposal for Outlot A, with a Child Care Center, receive only sketch plan approval at this point. JED/RLB:kkb a r ` � C ity o� � .,..1. � 1Viendota Heights March 2, 1992 Mr. Tpdd Stutz Executive Vice President ; The Rottlund Company, InaY 5201 East River Road, Suite 301 Fridley, MN 55421 Dear Mr. Stutz: t • '�` ' As you are aware, the Planning Commi.ssion conducted a public hearing for the Rottlund Homes Winterwood Planned Unit Development on the evening of February 25, 1992, to consider a request for a Rezoning, Sketch Plan and Preliminary Approval for a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat. During the course of the public hearing, a number of concerns were addressed by the Planning Commission and by the public who were present for.the hearing. •The Planning Commission continued the public hearing until �their regularly scheduled March 24, 1992 meeting, to- allow you, as the developer, time to provide information that was not included in the application, and to addr,ess items that they felt needed further elaboration. � -The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the specific requests for response that the Planning Commission asked you to provide prior to the next public hearing in order to address the questions that were raised. Your response should be directed, in writing or plan form, to City staff by March 18, 1992, in order to allow for staff review and submission to the members of the Planning Commission prior to the March 24, 1992, Planning Commission meeting. At the Planning Commission's public hearing, you were asked to provide, or further elaborate on, the following items: . 1. Zoning Ordinance No. 401, Sections 22.3(1)d and 22.5(4)b regarding a statement of proposed financing to provide assurance, to the Planning Commission, of the completion of the Planned Unit Development. 2. Outlot A was included as part of your Planned Unit Devel•opment. Zoning Ordinance No: 401, Sections 22.5(3)b (containing sketch plan. requirements), 5.7(3)a (containing rezoning requirements) and 5.6(2)(b) , (containing conditional use permit requirements) require that you_ provide the City.with specific information regarding the development of Outlot A. � 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, � 1VIN • 55118 452 • 1850 __ Mr. Todd Stutz March 2, 1992 Page 2 3. A soil survey of the site was requested by the Planning Commission, as required in Subdivision Ordinance No. 301, section 4.1(2)g. 4.� Zoning Ordinance No. 401, Section 22.5(4)c requires a statement of the �xesent ownersliip of all land within the Planned Unit Deve'�opment and that should be provided. At the meeting, you verbally stated you would prov�de :� copy of the Purchase Agreement and this should be provided also. � ... 5. The Planning Commission requested an accurate tree survey be provided as required by the ordinance. Your response should fully address the requirements stipulated in Sections 4.1(2) h and 4.1(4) h, of Subdivision Ordinance No. 301, regarding tree surveys and a vegetation preservation and protection plan. Also requested that evening, was a better plan f.or the landscape bu€fer along the eastern edge of the project site where it borders the Mendota Woods subdivision. 6. Zoning Ordinance No. 401, Section 5.6(2)b.2 requires a plan showing the location of all adjacent buildings located within three hundred fifty feet (350') of the exterior boundaries of the property in question, and that should be provided. 7. The Planning Commission requested that the amount of open space within the project be compared to the amount of building and hard surface. Please provide us with how many square feet of the Planned Unit Development consists of the building pad and adjacent patio areas, how many square feet consists of parking and driveways and how many square feet are included within the Planned Unit Development. 8. The Planning Commission also requested that a full size set of the original plans be provided. Seven sets of full-size plans should be submitted prior to the March 18th deadline. In addition to the above application material requirements and requests from the Planning Commission, an Escrow for Planning Services in the amount of $2,500 is required to cover any additional staff time, consultant or attorney fees, and materials necessary for further review of your application beyond the normal � Mr. Todd Stutz March 2, 1992 Page 3 costs associated with your applications's first public hearing. I have attached a copy of Resolution No. 91-54 that outlines the required escrows for certain applications. The escrow may be deposited with the City any time prior to the March 18, 1992 deadline. , � As a related issue, on�February 25, 1992 you asked the City to consider having the City Attorney in attendance at the I�arch'24, 1992 Planning Commission meeting. As you are aware, the Planning Commission func�ions in an advisory capacity to the full City Council, and it is the City Council which is ultimately charged with deciding matters of policy, including land use matters. Given the role and function of the Planning Commission, the City Attorney has never been directed to attend a meeting of the Planning Comm3.ssion, an.d the City sees no necessity to do so in the present insta.nce. Be assured that the City Attorney will be present when your planning application is considered before the City Council. The intent of this letter -is to provide a common understa.nding for addressing the Planning Commission's concerns and requests. The above list should not be �considered all inclusive for items that may need to be addressed. In this connection, for example, your planned unit development proposal must address the requirements of the City Subdivision Ordinance. We have a great amount of detailed and technical items to be addressed in a short time frame, and I am hoping that�we will continue to have the same level of cooperation between our staffs that we have had to date. Sincerely, ��.�(/"I/1� Revin Batchelder Administrative Assistant RLB:kkb Attachment � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAK4TA 'COUNTY, MINNESt3TA RESOLUTION NQ.91-54 A RESOLIITION REVISING SCHEDIILE t?F FEES FOR PLANNING SERVICES AHEREAS, the City af Mendota Heights adopted a Zoning Ordinance Recadification at the Juiy 26, 1991 City Cauncil meeting; and �; , .�. . WHEREAS, the cast of services rendered is ever-incr�easing; and AIiEREAS, it is appropriate that fees be revised to cover the increasing costs in pravidirig the services and that new fees be established. � NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that Attachment A {Attachment A to Resolution No. 91-54j listing the Schedule of Fees is hereby approved and adopted. Adapted by the City Counczl of the City of Mendata Heights this 20th day af August, 1991. CITY Ct?UNCIL ' CSTY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By f�'.,.� � Idf����..•�"' . �� Charles E, Mertensotta, Mayor _� ATTEST: .�c�'.ltt,.� thleen M. Swanson, City Clerk 0 Y a � ATTACHMENT A TO RESOLUTION NO. 91-54 Applications Fee Escrow "� Variance - , residential $ 50 none � commercial $ioo ; . � �' Vacations $250 none . .,� ;�; . Wetlands Permits Resid. $135 none Comm. $175 none ' Critical Area Review $100 none Minor CAO Review Fee Waived none Zoning Ordinance Amendment $250 none Conditional Use $350 none Permit Rezoning $350 see below CUP for PUD $500 see below . Subdivision $335 see below �s Comprehensive Plan . Amendment $500 see below Escrows are based on zoning districts and are applied, at the time of application, in the case of Rezonings, CUP for PUDs, Subdivisions and Comprehensive Plan Amendments as follows: R-1, R-1A, R-1B, R-2, R-3 , 0-10 Units $100 per unit 11-40 IInits $50 per unit 40 + Units $2,500 maximum B-1, B-1A, I $1,000 B-2, B-3, B-4 - $1,500 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �'�� • March 11, 1992 T0: FROM: Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant John P . Macz7�o Fire Chief SUBJECT: Winterwood Development The following represents comments from Paul Kaiser and myself relating to the Winterwood Development proposed by Rotland Homes. 1. We applaud the decision by Rotland Homes to sprinkle their buildings, I believe this truly does show a commitment to safety by Rotland Homes. 2. The long deadends to several buildings are of concern to us. In our initial review there is no apparent way that we can turn our fire apparatus around without backing the vehicles completely out these long deadends. With the consideration that Rotland is providing automatic sprinkler systems in their buildings it will probably be sufficient if they could provide a combination turnaround area thus allowing us to pull into a driveway and backout onto the private street so that we can turn the apparatus around. 3. Street design and turning radii should be of equivalent capacity to allow us to safely negotiate our vehicles on the street system. 4. The 24 foot street widths are only appropriate if in fact Rotland is not going to allow parking on these street sections. As in the requirements for the Centex development, Rotland should be aware that if there becomes excessive parking on these narrow streets that they will be required to post "NO PARKING" on all of them. 5. As in the Centex development snow removal appears to be by private contractor. It is impairitive with the narrow streets that this snow be pushed back far enough to allow fire apparatus to negotiate the system. It will be the responsibility of Rotland Homes to develop a plan to see that this is taken care of. r 6. There are several areas that there are traffic circles incorporated in the development. I would to ask that these traffic circles be developed in such a way that fire apparatus can negotiate these -- without significant delay. 7. There appears to be separate entrances to each side of the development with no interior connection. �We do request that there be a continuous roadway through the development. In an emergency situation we ma.y not be able to�ge��to certain areas via only one entrance. Therefor.e we feel it should be a requirement that the trao areas be connected. In looking at the plan this looks like it would be relatively easy to accomplish. 8. In reviewing the water plans it look like their water plans and hydrant locations were adequate for the development for fire protection. 9. During construction complete access in the access road must be heavy enough to handle fire apparatus that may required in that area. 10. We also had a questions as to what the roofing material was, with the only concern being is that we would like, at all costs, to try and avoid cedar shake roofing ma.terial. cc: Paul Kaiser John Neska Mendota Heights Police Department MEMORANDUM February 5, 1992 TO: Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder and Planning Commission FROM: Chief of Police�� � � SUBJECT: Winterwood Homes ��' ��' As you requested, I have reviewed the preliminary plans for the�Winterwood Courtyard Homes development on Mendota Heights Road near podd Road. The following comments and suggestions are offered: 1. Address Numbering a. The two private roads entering the development should be marked with the addresses that are accessible by those roads. b. Each building must display address numbers that are clearly visible from the private roadways. I would assume that those address numbers are going to be in a sequence and form to coincide with Mendota Heights Road addresses. c. Each individual unit should be identified with illuminated numbers or letters that are significantly different in form from the building numbers. Those numbers obviously should be clearly visible from the outside of the building. d. Every building and every unit should have numbers displayed in the same order or sequence. Unit A in building 856 should be the same orienta- � tion as Unit A in building 902, as an example. 2. Lighting a. All doorways should be lighted. �, b. Building and unit numbers should have 24 hour lighting or photo elec- tric cell lighting that will illuminate the numbers during the night- time hours. c. Parking areas and garage areas should be appropriately lighted. d. The area between the freeway and the development offers the greatest opportunity for concealment and should be lighted. The area between the development and the Mendota Woods, requires similar attention. e. The intersections of private roadways and Mendota Heights Road should be lighted, as well as the signs or markers that display the building numbers. � ♦ � t l • 3. Roadway System a. The private roadway system consists of two "one-way in, one-way out" driveways to access the east and west clusters. Police officers will " resist patrolling the property because of the dead-in nature of the roadway system. By connecting the two clusters of buildings, the officers would be able to enter one driveway, patrol the development, ' and exit the other drive. I believe this would enhance the patrol- ling of the developmer�t . ° b. Due to the narrow roadways and the many corners involved�•pa�king should be prohibited in any area other than in the designated:and clearly marked stalls. Parking in front of garages should be strictly prohibited. c. The private driveways should be posted with stop signs where they intersect with Mendota Heights Road. a �, ROrITTLIJND HOMES A DIVISION OF THE RO'IT[.UND COMPANY, WC. i �f DATE: March 17,1992 TO: Mayor and City Council Members Planning Commission Members RE: Rottlund Homes P.U.D., Winterwood Courtyard Homes PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE (REVISED) MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD AND DODD ROAD, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS The Rottlund Company is pleased to submit the revised drawings which iden6fy additional information requested by the Planning Commissioners at the February 25 meeting, and staff concerns outlined in memos dated February 5, March 2, and March 11,1992. Pach issue will reference your City Code, departmental concern or Planning Commission comments. CO(IE ICCLeS The project as proposed is consistent with the City of Mendota Heights Southeast Area Comprehensive Plan as amended by the Council in 1989 for multi-family residential of 8 units per acre or less. Approval of the HR/PUD zoning would make the current R-1 zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as the R-1 zoning is currently a holding designation pending this approvable plan. Regarding Ord. 401, Section22.5 (3)b, Section 22.5(4)a The Rottlund Company, Inc. proposes "Winterwood Courtyard Homes." Planned Unit Development of 9.58 acres and 68 units, a for sale residential development. In addition, a 94 acre outlot will be created as part of the HR/PUD, designated for a daycare use. (See attached letter from R.A. Putnam and Associates dated 3-92.) The total area of the PUD is 10.52 a�res, exceeding the lOAC minimum size code requirement. The 68 unit residential component will consist of seven (7) eight unit buildings and one (1) twelve unit building. The orientation of the shructure and elevation changes minimize views of the buildings. The use of Planned Unit Development regulations has permitted flenibility in site design as it relates to existing topography, storm water detention pond location, open space loca6ons, architectural site lines, improved streetscape and landscaping, etc. Phone 612-571-0304 Fax 612-571-1085 5201 East River Road #301 Fridley, MN 55421 Regarding Section 22.5(4)b and 22.3(1)d. The Rottlund Company, Inc. is proposing possible financing of all acquisition development and building construction. Total acquisition and development costs are estimated to be approximately $1,000,000 dollars. Total building construction costs are estimated to be appro�cimately $3,500,000 dollars. Total acquisition development and consfruction costs are estimated to be approximately $4,500,000 dollars. The Rottlund Company, Inc. is a privately held S Corporation with the following Corporate O�cers: ; � y. David H. Rotter - President :; Mr. Rotter is responsible for the supervision and management of consiruction, internal man�gement and coordination. Currently Mr. Rotter is on the Board of Directors for Housing Software Corp., a leader in the development of computer soflware for the building industry. He is also a member of the Minneapolis Area Board of Realtors and National Association of Realtors. Bemard 7. Rotter - Vice President Mr. Rotter is responsible for all marketing, advertising, land acquisition and financing. Mr. Rotter has conceived and implemented the "Give a Child a Chance" house in Apple Valley for the Minneapolis Childrens Medical Center. Proceeds from the raffle of this house will fund a permanent endowment for the hospital. Ellroy 7. Lund - Director Mr. Lund is responsible for the public relations of T�e Rottlund Company, Inc. Mr. Lund is a Past President of the Minnesota State Builders Association, active in the Builder Polidcal Action Committee and an active member in the Na6onal Association of Home Builders serving as Chauman of the National Committee on Construction and Codes. He was also appointed by the NAI� President to serve on the Affordable Housing Task Force. The combined experience of these individuals represents over 60 years in the building indusiry. History: The Rotflund Company, Inc. was formed in August 1973. Since its incepfion, the company has been in the business of building multi-family and single family housing in addi6on to a limited amount of land' development. Over this time period, the company has grown to become the largest builder in Minnesota. In March of 1992 Rotdund was ranked by "Professional Builder Magazine" as the 61st largest builder in the country. Rotflund currenfly employs a team of sixty-eight result oriented individuals dedicated to building and maintaining a reputation of honesty, integrity, and fairness in all its business practices. Rottlund builds a wide selection of homes - from housing for the first home buyer to executive custom homes. The company enjoys one of the finest reputations in the Twin Ciries as a quality home builder. The growth that the company has experienced has been a result of several factors among which are its skill in marketing and managing, its emphasis on affordability combined with innovativeness and high quality standards of construction, excellent service, and a continued open line of communication with customers and suppliers. With delivery of more than 700 homes, this past year has been the busiest and most successful in Rottlund's history. The Rotflund Company, Inc. has received many Awards of Bxcellence from the Minneapolis Builders Association, and the St Paul Builders Association, as well as from local communities and cities. The Rottlund Company, Inc. continues to be an industry leader by its commitment to its customers, the building industry, and the business community. Lender References: �" � Per the request of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission, The Rottlund Company, In�. is pleased to supply the following listing of lender references for your review. The Rotdund Company, Inc. is presenfly actively involved in a lending relationship with these lenders. Please feel free to contact any of the following references regarding The Rottlund Company, Inc. ability to undertake the development you are being asked to consider. Mr. John Carlson President United Mortgage Corporation 8300 Norman Center Drive, Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55437-1091 (612)835-3906 Mr. Tom Iiansen Vice President Eastern Heights State Bank 7525 Currell Boulevazd Woodbury, MN 55125 (612)736-9948 Mr. Robert Mongee Vice President Marquette Bank Minneapolis, N.A. 90 South Sixth Sireet Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612)341-5700 Mr. Mark Novitzki vice President Premier Bank White Bear and Beam Avenues Maplewood, MN 55109 (612)777-7700 Mr. Ron Allars Vice President Consir�c6on Mortgage Investors Co. 300 Morse Avenue P.O. Box 40 Excelsior, MN 55331 (612�70-3650 Mr. Donald Solie Vice President Investors Savings Bank 200 East Lake Street Wayzata, MN 55391 (612�75-8705 Due to the proprietary nature of The Rottlund Company, Inc. corporate financial statements, we will not be providing this information to the Commission as requested. This information would provide our competitors with a potential competitive advantage. Regarding Section 22.5(4)c. On January 10,1992, The Rottlund Company, Inc. entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with R. A. PuMam and Assaciates, Inc. for the purchase of the subject property. The signature page and legal descripfion pages are attached. Regarding Section 22S(4)d. June 1, 1992 July 15,1992 July 16,1992 May 30, i993 Tentative Schedule of Development Commence Land Development Complete Land Development Commence Building Construction Complete Building Construction Schedule assumes building starts of on� building per month with a 120 calendar day construction schedule per building. � � All land development will be completed as one phase. Schedule of Development dces no� include the outlot. , Regazding Section 22.5(4)e. The target market of the proposed residential units is empty nester age 55 and older. Pach home will be two story with a main floor master bedroom and bath. The Courtyard Home is a new product design which The Rottlund Company, Inc. will introduce at this site. T�vo floor plans offered will range from 1395 to 1422 square feet in size. Each home will have a private entrance, and single or double attached garage. In addition to the first floor master bedroom, a second bedroom and loft space will be provided on the second floor. Interior storage and utility room space has been provided for in each home. Buildings will be configured in eight unit and twelve unit buildings in a back to back townhome type style. Exteriors of the homes will be brick with aluminum. This type of exterior is expected to be maintenance free for over 20 years. Based upon our market analysis of the site, the proposed product type satisHes a significant mazket which exists in the Mendota Heights, West St Paul and Eagan market area for an empty nester age 55 and older main floor master hedroom townhome type product. No compefitive type product exists in the mazket area which will complete directly with this development. The price range of the product is expected to be in the $80,000 - $90,000 range. The approximate density of dwelling units is 7.1 units per acre, within the Code. Regazding Section 22.5(4)f. Employment opporlunities created by this development will be limited to consiruction employmen� �� Regazding Section 22S(4)g. A 40,950 square foot outlot site will be created by the HR/PUD designated as a daycare use. Regarding Section 22S(4)h. The estimated amount of developed open space for both uses is 236,338 square feet, 51% or 5.43 acres. The Rotdund parcel alone contains 49.4% open space. All open space or common area will be governed by a homeowners association. All landscaped and sodded areas will have automatic underground � irrigation. Attached for your reference is a typical set of our Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Easements, Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation for the proposed homeowners association. Please note that we have provided staff with a revised copy of these documents, which indicates the ownership type to be condominium versus townhome. Regarding Ord. 301, Section 4.1(2)g. Braun Intertec Bngineering will be providing a soil survey of the site under separate cover to the City. � �,; Regarding Ord. 301, Section 4.1(2)h, 401(4)h. An additional plan identifies tree preservation and protection. The revised landscape plan identifies new installation of over 270 trees, including over 120 evergreens, totaling over 675 caliper inches on the Rottlund parcel alone. There is an average of 4 new trees per home. The existing 400 caliper inches of trees on site are primarily of the poplar family which are typically not saved as they re-establish quickly. Regardless, upon approval, we intend to tree spade many plants out of azeas of construction. :�� �i. i �rii:��i 0 ' � 'i It is estimated the development will generate 476 trips per day based upon 7 trips per residen6al unit. Previously a traffic study found adequate capacity in surrounding streets to accommodate a development generating 2,120 irips per day. Development site lighting will consist of individual home exterior lighting at entrances and garage areas, and street lights located at hoth entrances and at each cul-de-sac and guest parking. This addresses concerns voiced by the Police Chief over adequate safety and ease of identifying individual unit addresses. Numbering will meet Mendota Heights address standards. Numbering of each home will be consistent from building to building. Circulation now proceeds through the project allowing police to patrol the project on a"one-way in, one-way out" system, as requested by the Chief. This revision also allows the Fire Department improved circulation through the drive lanes. As each building is internally sprinklered for fue protection, the Fire Chief dces not have a significant concern regazding the internal circulation as improved. Curb radius have been designed to accommodate the needs of larger fire fighting vehicles. The area in front of the garages is for parking, just as in single family construction and do not conflict with the driving lanes. Adequate provisions for snow removal are part of Rottlund's ongoing maintenance commitment, with addidonal storage being provided in the detention pond area. �� No entrance monumentation is proposed at this time. However, a signif'icant amount of landscaping, boulder walls, etc. will occur at both entrances. Signage will be limited to fraffic signs and temporary marketing signage. Regarding Section 5.6(2)b.2. Additional information has been added to the sheet 4 of 8 showing buildings within 350 feet of the outer property lines as well as distance to the mainline of 494. .., Structural Roofing material is fire resistance asphalt shingle product with a 20 year warranty. Buildings will have additional features to protect against airplane noise, meeting standard FHS requirements such as 2 x 6 walls, central air and windows with a 28 STC rating or better. (A previous study is attached on the window product we will be furnishing.) Based upon our analysis, we anticipate outdoor noise levels in the 62 to 65 decibel range. � ,� :�� ��, •.. �• , An additional $2,500 is provided for additional reviews required by this project. The Rottlund Company is requesting a reasonable summary of expenses used against this escrow amount, with any unused monies returned upon the approval of the projec� Upon approval of $51,000 building permit, will be designated for park dedica6on uses. fiummarX The plan submitted has been improved through comments by staff and the Planning Commission. It allows for a rezoning which meets the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and the Code requirements. Improvements to the landscaping, automatic urigation and interior sprinklers will make Winterwood Courtyard Homes an attracfive and safe place to live. We look forward to your approval of the project so that we can proceed to implement the plans. ly submitted, Don Jensen President Land Development Manager D7/skh MENDOTA2.doc �� � INTERTEC Mareh 18, 1992 Mr. i odd Stutz Execu�ive Vice President ,% kottiund �Ioznes 5201 East River Raad, Suite 301 Fridley, MN 55421 Dear Mr. Stutz: Braun Intert+ec Engineering, tnc. 6801 Washington Avenue South P.O. Box 39108 M'snneapolis, Minnesota 55439-Q1Q8 612-941-56t10 Fax:94i-di51 Engineers and Scientists Servirrg the Buill and Natural Environments Project BABk-91-21i26 1'( G� C. i ti� i= i.I t��A►� 2 ti fi992 Re: Anticipated Soil Canditians, Wintez•waod Caurtyard Hames, Mendota Heights Road and Dodd Road, Mendata Heights, Minnesota As you requesteri on March 17, 1992, we have prepared this letter to provide aur opinion of the anticipated soil conditions at the Winterwood Courtyard F3flmes development. Az�aila#�ie Infarmatipn A capy of a site plan prepared by Pivne�r Engineering was gro�rided For uur use. Tt:e plan :s titled, "Grading and Drainage Plan," and is dated Pebruary 4, 199%. Summary Based on the site plan, previous geotechnical evaluations perfarmed by Braun Intertec Engineeczng, Inc., in the area, and on geoiogy ma�s of the area, it appears the soil conditions at the Winterwood Cpurtyard Hoznes development should consist of a relatively thin (ayer �f tapsoil underlain by poorly graded sand to silty sand glacially deposited soils. 'I'i�e sandy glacially deposited soils are typically suitable for �Il and house support. General Remarks Services perforzned oy the geotechnical engineers for this pro,ject have been conducterl with that level af care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currentiy practicing in this area. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. , Rottlund Homes Project BABX=91-2026 March 18, 1992 Page 2 It has been a pleasure performing these services for you. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please call john T. Carlson at (612) 942-1782. � �: Sincerely, �C , : ;; Professional Certi�cation: " I hereby certify that this report was preparerl by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. �� ��a� John T. Carlson, P.E.. Project Enaineer Registration Number: 20663 Date: March 18, 1992 '"""%� �'"-"-- ` JTt U Ray A. Huber, P.E. � Senior Engineer jtc\cah:mjs\pro�2026.2 e R. A. Putnam and Associates, Inc. 2765 Casco Point Road, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 • Ofi: & Fax (612) 471-0573 March,6, 1992 Mayor and City Council Members Planniag Commission Members City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN SS118 Re: Rottlund Homes, Winterwood Planned Unit Development Ladies aad Gentlemen: �• , I would like to answer questions raised at the February Planning Commission meeting. A. Site Ownership and Rottlund Home Purchase �t:p. Putnam and Assoc. Inc. (owner), a Minnesota Corporation, is the fee owner of the 10.3 acre parcel. The parcel was purchased from Opus Corporation in November�l988. The parcel is not incumbered with any financing or liens. R.A. Putnum & Assoc. Inc, is owned by Richard A. Putnam, President and Janet L. Putnam, Vice President whose offices are located at 2765 Casco Point Road, Wayzata, MN 55391. R.A. Putnam & Assoc., Inc. has signed a purchase agreement with Rottlund Homes to sell 9.58 acres of the 10.3 acre site for townhouse/condominium development consistent with the City of Mendota Heights' Southeast Area Comprehensive Plan and the city's zoning ordinance. Rottlund Homes will prepare plans and obtain all approvals necessary for completion of the residential project. Closing of the sale is scheduled for June,1992 with Rottlund Homes beginning site development shortly after closing. The owner will convey to Rottlund Homes a deed transferring ownership of the 9.58 acre parcel at the closing. The purchase agreement for the site will not be provided for public review. B. Outlot A, Future Development Site R.A. Putnam and Assoc., Inc. owner of the 10.3 acre parcel proposes to retain ownership of the .94 acre corner parcel. The .94 acre parcel shou(d be zoned HR-PUD as the Rottlund Homes site, subject to only sketch plan approval for a child care/day care use. � The owner shall submit detailed plans for city review and approval of a day care center for the .94 acre site. At the present time no day care provider or developer has been located for purchase of the site. The city zoning ordinance provides for a conditional use permit for day care use within multi-family residential. districts. It is the owner's _ intent, upon approval of the Rottlund Homes Winterwood project, to actively seek a day � care builder/owner and submit for approval at the earliest opportunity. ' _ Page 2 I believe the day care use on the carner site is a good use far the site for the follawing �� reasans: • Provides a needed service to the southeast area neighborhood at a convenient � iacatian. , t � �. * Pravides a reasanable way ta cambine the very small unbu�ldable parcel of Mr. Cari Case with the .94 acre site for one day care site. 'r' ' • The day care building provides an appropriate buffer use to the busy intersections with the Winterwood residential area. If the City Council and Planning Commission do not believe the day care use appropriate, the pwner will convey the site to Rottlund Honnes for a townhouse buitding, thereby using the entire site as multi-family.residential within the permitted density for the HR-PUD District. I have answered these qnestions ta the best of my abitity. I hape this is adequate to explain the issues. Thank you for this apportunity. Sincerely, ichard A. Putnam, President R.A. Putnam & Assoc. Inc. r PIIRCHASE-AND SALE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into thi� �G:�� day af January, 1992, by and between R.A. Putnam & Associates, inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota (the "Seller"), and The Rottiund Campany, Inc., a corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesata (the "Buyer"). ,t� ARTICLE 1 PROPERTY .; 1.3. Legal Description - Subject to the terms, canditians, representata.ons and warranties set forth herei.n, �eller agrees to sell to Btzyer, and Buyer agrees to purchase from Seller, property lacated in the City of Mendota Iieights, Dakota Caunty, State of Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference consi�ting o� approximately 9.3 acres (the "Property"). . ARTICLE 2 PURCHASE PRICE 2.3 PossibZe Tax-Free Exchancte - Seller hereby represents, and Buyer hereby acknow],edges, that Seller may desire to structure the transaction evidenced hereby as part of an exchange af properties o�' like ki.nd within �he contemplation of the Internal Revenue Code. Buyer hereby agrees to coaperate with Seller in structuring such a Iike kind exchange provided that (i) such cooperation shall be without cost or expenses to Buyer; (ii) Buyar shall receive notice of the proposed structure of the transaction and the identity and organizational farm of any third party participant and a copy of any exchange agreemen� ar ather agreements pertinent to the transaction at least fifteen (15) days prior ta the date of closingj {iii} all aspects of the like ._ kind exchange shall clo�e simultaneous].y an or before the date oi closing hereunder� and (iv} the structure of the transaction {A� � _ 10.04 Counterparts - This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which counterparts of this Agreement taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 10.05 Binding Effect; Assiqnment - This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns. ; 10.06 Headincrs - Art-iicle and Section headings used in this Agreement are for the convenience only and shall not �ffect the construction of this Agreement. t• � 10.07 Brokers - Buyer represents that it has not�dealt with any brokers concerning the Property, and Seller represents that � it has not dealt with any broker concerning the Property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above. SELLER: BUYER: R.A. Putnam & Associates, Inc. �% By: ,� �. - l R' rd A. utnam Its: President The Rottlund Company, Inc., a Minnesota corporation _,�..� : s — f�/.�i��ir" �' �' ,_ _ . THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD. (JSJ) 400 Northtown Financial Plaza 200 Coon Rapids Blvd. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55433 612-780-8500 \jsj\rottlund\putnam.pur � � � n'� J 1'L 1 iJ1-1 JT+• 14 • YJ � TU: H�y�"�it� i�`indavs► s'4� Da�r Co. a#t�: l�ick 1'�utshoff Itrduatci�l P'ark Rva�l , �ayfie�d, �+it� SS94ii � �•R{�JB�,�': �tlOD Sltd�r►� Vv�nd4w: Daubto Glaz�d j 8ClDUCTI+CaN� r.a I �.,.i.. � � K�'! ".c.�'_2 ..^..�'� � +5&2 !:FlOt�W�LL ASt�NNt1E 8?: PA11t.. Mhi 6�1'14 f'HOAf� Si2F��t ,�ATE: �3ctt�t��r � # , 1 R�} 1 P�� 2+�0; 4t4Q! 9Z 21�i� REVI�iUi�t; I+tovember 1d, 19$# �ULJND TRAIri�ME�ION G'�.AS� (S'i•C} . This report pres�nts the results of a Scwnd �`rans�rxission Class (5TG'� ttst r,onduct.ed on a 2UOq Slidi�g WEndow manufac��red by �ayfr�id t�ladcrw & l7oat Co. This f�t w�s requeSted by Dick itouIlt�iY on {3ctober Z5, f9gt arul was ct�n��tCtl �n t3ctab�r �9, 199l. Thix re�ott mtcst nat bc rcpradu�ced except in fttli wlth th� apprq�! of Twjn Clty 't'esting. Th� data in thls re�wrt refa�s ot�iy w the 3tem t�steci. 'Twin City T�sting o� �r�t��rn l�ss be�n a�dite�3 by the '�.5. i��parm�ent c►f CvmmCrc� �� #�� Natio�i In�t�cute of Standard$ e��d T�hnol�gS' (fsIS'Z', forn�rly NBS} ttn�der lhar Nat#ueaa.t V�Iuntary Lal�orat�ry Accredita� Progra�n (xJV"L,A.�} far conduding t}iis best �rmced�rG. �`I�+is r�part may aot l�e uaeci ta ci�im pr��e;ct snclorsr.mCnt bq KV�,AP rn�lty �geacy of the U.S. Ga�vernrne�i. '�'��' J���s..s�.l��t�i�t�t- 'T.ha STC t�F the ZOf)0 Slidin,� �Vindaw tiescribed betaw was �Q, �See individual rralues in TBST R�StJL'X'S secticm.) �._:�} �- ' ► � Haq i'nal� 20tid Sikling 'W'tru�ow - 13J1G" Tnsuh�ted gtas� - �/t6' S�tteri�r gla�ss - 7!!i6• Arir s cc�`�� - 314�� J� �',R1S�i` • Size: (.1 m wicfe by 1,4 rri h3gh �t.'7 m.2} ��ight: 44 kg {26,9 ��fmx} .� k # �r� + .. f l._ 3.$' x 4.8` (t$ sq, it� 98 Ibs (5.5 p�s� ASTM:89ti{94), "Labaratory Mc.,as{zreannent +�f A�irborn+� S�und T`tansmi�sinn �af Bui[dirtg Part�Eiara", was followed in �very rr�pr.ct. Tha sampla was lnscalted f� a�i!!er wa1� wh#c�t h�d a precl�t�rmi�i S'FC rating t�f �}. The perlmeter was scalexi �+ith a dcnte, nan�tting cauIk �nci So�rid le�kka � cltec�� w�te Gbndttc� prl� ta c,�mmencing acau�►i tBst,in�. .�gp�apr�ate cah:ulatiar�a were made to d��ne th� cor�cibvtian �f the fiitcr w�t! transr�issicxu and thc sa�mp�e tras�mission. The S'i`C vaiu� was c�t�intd by aPP�ying the �'r�mission Loss (�'L} V�Ic�a tv tts� STC tofes�ettCC Cotlic�r flf ASTI+lI: F4���,�ij: `ucternlin�tiot� vf Scfund Tra�ml��inn C#:+�. ` , +�S � Mtt�isK FRtrY�Ctwn so W�+N{S. tesE it�tClSNO Qt�E�.REatt�t�ii. iWGY t�'tY TE�T�lstf3 COlt�AYiO�n �EnC�'i � itlB�iti�.a li3 tkL CQ1iRDE�t:ut. �d'ERrv OF C�iNT�. �t►MD ulrH}R¢ATptlw soa PusG�C+vk7Not su��AL►AQ Co�.usbNa OR iktR�nOrc6 �qht CR f�l,'�o�oNd OWI RZPbtrTs �s REs6AYfiA A£nOwG OVIt PAIaA N9�trTtH AfWM�Q"l�tt. � JYI't L'� � 7� it9� J39 ��flk�ECT',NCl: �tl44 9�-2i2B DAT�: Uctober 31,- t991>,, P'A�E: Z l2EVISYUN: N�avernber !4, 1991 "i'�S'�` �xtt�►t��t���+tS�nE: '�e �ttual transmission loss at each fraquency was �alct►i�d b� 1ht fo]l�►wing equ�tion: TL � NX� +�tt iog S-�U k� A�, where; 'FL = Tcansmiss9an i.oss {�) . NR = I�loise �teduction �d$) S� Surf:�ce �re� comrreun ta t�o�t6 sid�s (sq. itj < tia g sozmci absnrption of th� rer.civing t�uom �vtth the sampl� in �iac� {sabins) r� IL�.�.7 R �,���1� 1 i �_ ��� I�Torwegfar� Lleccronics 8r�el &. T�j�r Z.BfSUii-�V1S � �s�r _�sr�,�. �� f2� 1ft� 2{�0 254 3!5 �00 500 61#� ${f0 1000 13��0 i�Otf � 25�U 3154 ��oo v�rhEre: ir ± _s za �3 I�, 20 �6 25 2b 27 3�,► 32 32 34 35 �S 35 39 De.gC�ittt't it Reai Time A�talyz�r Pcasaura Cander;ser MicropiEone �'rC3sUr� �.`viidGlS�T 11+'��Ct'Op�0i1� � Q 2 4 3 0 4 � � � '1 � �l 0 0 a � T4T�,I., D�FICI�Ci�S: �b 5htiC� T�, � T�ansmission L�t:ss (ciB� CL. = Cont�dGnce ilmit {d8) def d b�ficiencies (b�low 5TC ctsntour) e r.� {� t � , � �. � 1i511 23901b 1�}3Z e m:wtaisiuht�ttOtECY1�NR?GtfENTS,�t6cw��AisOtSt�c�EYef W rTf�ttCtfYTGfiitNGGoe#�AsOWi3EPtNiCRAit�Slktu�[�F1�n,�R�GCQf�Ip=qtv�trtt�ry,^it1YCtCLEk1� �wp �UI IFIQ(1QA110k PtMI l�'llmSf'dfK}N 4�'t,11qFM�H1�S. R91#C'I tlRttm3 W1 GxTMGIr1N& Ff10tA O:� nER�tftOtFJi/ t�lltt fKhllptk, iE r1EA6f'Nkp f'dM'HHI,s rxtR �Ytift WlpTt£N,w�rtqnKl _ J/Ti1 C.10 �G lYJ•JL ��t(��;CT_NO: 41dd! 92 2I2� �� .' e � ,. �� ��iaRli L+�iK7�� �l� �77� FAGE: 3 �E�i��UN; tdavember 1.4, 1.991 TWIN CM"Y T�STING COR�'(3RATIUN , t�.i'�� ` ~����� ,�,/ Sizarflynn Fnnegan ACOus�C2tt T�i1�ee�'ing �'eCl1ltician Mec#�anic�!lkl�e�aflur�9c�l �3ivi�ian SI�fRCYI'14 � di} 92 212$ P.3 r�vi+��v�d by.• r.�.- ''t�� ,� �`�. x.���a c�. �,��a�� AcaustiGa#JFenestrattitrn, Superv�sar N�echan3cailMetallurg,ca! �iiviston r AF h e�UtLw.lSKNkLit4N rcit�tEH'� ME s�tlfi.� �rDat�l.4t:t:1E'S. u.t �YANCttr sE&i►Fi�i COW�01ihIWN ttEl�AhtS �i4E Yi1�Aat t�fi A� iFk co►if�iN.MPW. pwp�qt`� 4F (�.�MtS. � _ �N►ld,�f�iOF�lqtflllt`Si(tC1F4HK1Ai1S1H!'lff.ShifEAFl+tIS.f,itl�,US+ANSCtRf.X7fNCJfCkdS2iA{iAiO:tftH4�tC#NbCAIiR(t(iCNit:l6Yfil;�fiiiVt?ill'tNS}��ii54U�VWtlB►tWINfIkNAl7'1N7V011, ' - -- �.�+..�..--..'..'�-_----�.. a R OMES A DIVISION OF THE ROTI'LUND COMPANY, INC. Date: March 18,1992 To: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant From: Don Jensen, Land Development Manager Todd Stutz, Executive Vice President Re: Revisions to Winterwood Courtyard omes Project � � Bnclosed aze the following items for distribution to Staff, Planning Commission and the City Council: 1) The Rottlund Company, Inc. memo dated 3/17/92 to Code and Staff concerns; 2) Check in the amount of $2,500.00 as escrow for City review; 3) Sound Transmission study for windows, etc. to be used in higher noise zones; 4) Copy of letter from R A. Putnam & Assoc. regarding outlot land use and ownership; 5) Front and Back page of purchase agreement; 6) 7 full sets of plan revisions from Pioneer Bngineering; 7) Typical Homeowners Association Documents; 8) Financial References. Please distribute as you see fit and conf'um your distribution with us. Thank you! cc: John Bannigan, 7r., Attorney mendotal Phone 612-571-0304 Fax 612-571-1085 5201 East River Road #301 Fridley, MN 55421 0 � APR-03-1992 10�20 FRDM TQ 4528940 P.02 �� �� , '� P1�Oi`I�E�ER '� enc,,,�.in�+�ering �* -� �� , Ghrll Eraglnesrs • Land Planners • Land Surveyors • Landscape Ar+chttects April i, 1992 DZSGREPfjNCY IN THE STZE 4F 7HE EXCEPTIOI+l� ' ' ; �' QF WIt�TERWQO� COURTYARD HOMES �'� • ` � ` ' � According to a boundary survey suppl�.ed bY the land owner, the parcel d�f�ned as an "Exception" wEas, in approxi�ated rna.mbers, 105� f8et X 199 feet_ Th�.s excepisons Ie9aI descriptio� was defined in a way tF�at the centerlirte of Dodd Road was a controll.ing �.ittie in the pa�cel description. The origfr�al SiAi'V9YOi s erraneously described iL off the new centerlxnv loc�ttiott of Doc�cF Road. Dodd Roed had beerr relocated when the interchange wa� constructed. 7�tis parcel le�a� shauld have bee� described using the ald centerline af Dodd Road. The end resu.It is, s decr�aaze in size of the.,�+xception ard th+� Der Car+� Gentes increasing in size. The esstsrly iine will shift to the��west approximately 40 feet, making the exceRtions siZe bd feet. X 19g feet. Att exact boundary survey is in process attd will. bs sup�lzed to the City prior to fina3. piat approva3. e 2422 Enterorise Drnre • Mendota Heisthts, tl�innesota 55i 2Q •{612} 68t -1 S14 •�ax 681 3488 APR-81-1992 17�19 FROM ; �* �� � �� ���i�Rt�E� R � � e,ng�ne+erirtg �* � �� t TO 4528940 P.b� 'r Chril Engineers • L.and Plartners • Land Surveyors • Landscape Ar�hitects DISCREPANC� iM TME SiZE OF THE EXCEPTION ' OF � WINTERWOQD C4UR7YAR0 HOMES t� `�` .y,� •. A��q:��'. f. fi�pr i 1 1, 1992 Accordins ta a bour�dary survey suppiied by the land owner, the parcel cfefined a5 �n 'Exception" was, in approximated numbets, IC5 feet X 299 feet_ This exceptions 1e9a1 descripti�sn aas defined in a�,ay that tha cettter 1 i�te af Dodd Road was $ contro 11 in9 1 ine f n the parce�. d�rscription. The o�rigittal surveyor, erroneously described it offi the new centerline location of t?odd Road _ t3cdd Road had been TQZOCF��GI when the interchange Nas corrstructed. This pat-c�al isaal should have been ctescribed usina the old centeriine of Oodd Raad_ The end resul� is, a cFecrease in size of the exception ar►d th,� Day carc Center increasing in size. The easterly line wili shift to the west sppToxirnately 4Ci fest, making the except%ons size 60 feet X 199 feet. An exact bounda:Y sicrvey is in process and aill be SuPPI.iBd ta Lhe City pricr to final p3at apRroval. _ ? , � � 2422 Enterprise Drive • Mendaia Heights, Minnesota 55120 •(612) 681-1914 • fax 681-9488 625 Hi�hway 1fl N.E. • 81air+e. Mir�nesota 5543�4� •(612) 783•188d * Fax �$3-1883 R L� OMES A DMSION OF THE ROTTLUND COASANY, ING DATE: March 31,1992 TO: Mayor, Manager and City Council Members RL: Rottlund Homes P.U.D., Winterwood Courtyard Homes Response to Planning Commission Motion for Denial, Request for Unanimous Approval from City Council PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE (REVI�ED) MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD AND DODD ROAD, CTTY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS The Rotflund Company plan accomplishes the long term Comprehensive Plan goal of creating a transitional medium to high density residential project on land that is located at an on/off ramp for I-494 and Dodd Road. The plan accomplishes the long delayed rezoning of R-1 land to HR/PUD, as requested by Council in the adoption of the Southeast Area Comprehensive Plan as amended by the Council in 1989 for multi-family residential of 8 units per acre or less. Approval of the HR/PUD zoning would make the cunent R-1 zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as required by State Planning legislation. The R-1 zoning is currently a holding designation pending this approvable plan (DSU report). Our plan does not conflict with any specific section of the City Code. Our plan meets reasonable interpretations of quality site planning, per correspondence received by both Staff and in the Planning ConsultanYs report to the Planning Commission dated Feb. 25,1992. The Rottlund Company was pleased to have submitted revised drawings to the Planning Commission which identified all additional information requested by the Planning Commissioners at the February 25 meeting, and Staff concerns outlined in memos dated February 5, March 2, and March 11,1992. At the meeting of March 24, the Commission interpreted our information and project in a manner which we believe to be inconsistent with your City Code. This memo will respond to each and every one of the items mentioned in Commissioner Friel's pre-drafted motion for denial. Our submittal certainly meets or exceeds all the criteria outlined both by staff and your Planning Consultant. Throughout the Commission meeting, we remained open to comments which suggested improvements to the project. o The Rottlund Company plan meets Metropolitan Council goals of having a diversity of housing types and styles in the suburban area. � o The plan provides for housing which targets an empty nester market, and is a project which does not discriminate against future homeowners on the basis of age, race, income, disability or type of housing product. This is not merely a Rottlund Homes policy, it is Federal law. Phone 612-571-0304 Fax 612-571-1085 5201 East River Road #301 Fridley, MN 55421 Cited Code L.csues and Motion for Denial Resnonse Regarding Ordinance 401, Section 13 and 22 noncompliance: Our previous memo of March 17,1992 identified previous Staff and Commission concerns made l�own to The Rotflund Company. The following summary describes all the information cited as missed or omitted by the Planning Commission in their motion for denial. Our presentation on April7th will highlight and refute each and every one of these items. The Rottlund Company, Inc. progosal for "Winterwood Courtyard Homes" is a Planned Unit Development on 9.58 acres, is 68 units, and is a"for sale" residential development. In addition, a 1.05 acre ouflot will be created as part of the HR/PUD, designated for a daycare land use. (See attached letter from R.A. Putnam and Associates dated 3-92.) The total area of the PUD is now 10.63 acres, exceeding a lOAC minimum size code requirement for R-3 zoning. Regazdless, the HR/PUD zoning does allow for less than 10 acres (DSU report, pge 1, par. 2). The 68 unit residential component consists of seven (7) eight unit buildings and one (1) twelve unit building. The use of Planned Unit Development regulations permits flexibility in site design as it relates to existing topography, storm water detention pond location, open space locations, architectural site lines, improved streetscape and landscaping, etc. Regarding NIr. Friel's motion item #1, that we do not: a) preserve the natural and scenic qualities for open areas; The Rottlund proposal is to be built on a parcel framed by I-494, Dodd Road, and Mendota Heights Road. The site was once a borrow area for consiruction of I-494. The site has been regraded to drain and is quite level. With the exception of a few oaks and maple on Ouflot A and less than 7 small oaks and ash on the east boundary, the site is devoid of quality hardwood trees or any significant vegeta6on at all. The proposal works with the limited natural features and enhances them through the movement of trees where feasible and the introduction of over 270 new trees. There are no natural and scenic qualities to preserve. b) that our proposal dces not limit development to a scale appropriate to the existing terrain and surrounding land use; The Rotdund proposal meets the intent of Section 13.1(2)a, is proposed on a level site, and meets the intent of the Guide Plan (DSU report, page 1, par. 2) regarding density and intensity. c) that our proposal dces not result in an effective and unified treatment of the development possibilities on the project site; The Rotflund proposal is unified through the use of common building size, materials, color, landscaping, circuladon system and land forms. The buildings are not on a grid. The only 12 unit building on the site is visually oriented to I-494, not Mendota Woods or Bridgeview Shores single family projects. As presently submitted, 49.4% of the project is an irrigated maintained unified landscape! d) that our proposal does not harmonize with the existing and proposed development in the azeas surrounding the site; The Rottlund proposal harmonizes by having structures no more than 2 stories tall, not unlike many new single family homes being built today. The project focuses inward through the use of private drives, berms and landscape buffering of the 5 single family lots we abut. Our project is it's own neighborhood and is maintained uniformly through a homeowners association. It will harmonize with adjacent development by being one of the best maintained properties in its neighborhood. 2 Paragraph 1- our project has unsafe private streets; The Rottlund plan utilizes a standard private drive dimension of 24 feet (with no parking signs), long recognized by the American Planning Association as a more than adequate, safe roadway dimension that allows for the function of smooth, safe, transportation without creating needless asphalt and wasted open space opportunities. The DSU report, page 2, paragraph 2, states that traffic is not an issue in this case. Section 22.1(3)a requests driveways not exceed 25 feet in residential districts. Motion item 2. We do not meet deiinitional requirements of 22.1(a) and (b); Per Code Section 13.1(1), ... the ten acre minimum for a PUD (Secfion 22.1) is waived ... The Rotflund plan complies. Motion item 3. That granting a CUP would have an adverse and detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the future occupants. The Rotflund Plan is functionally similar to most of the existing "Villa" projects currently built in the Twin Cities. The projects all enhance the health, safety, and welfaze of occupants by fire sprinklering the units, by providing more interior square footage than some single family homes, by contracting for long term ongoing maintenance. The sale of over 1,200 Villa units alone is testimony that a great deal of the public is quite happy with The Rotdund Company quality projects and housing products. The granting of a CUP will not have an adverse and detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the future residents. ... that our proposal dces not meet the requirements for a Conditional Use Permit as specif'ied in Section 5.6 (5); The Rotflund proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, is a bene�t to the public through the provision of a quality, affordable housing product, does not in any way contribute to traffic patterns not already anticipated by the sizing of roadways and utilities. There is no evidence that any Rottlund neighborhood has decreased anyone's property value. Our neighborhoods have typically enhanced both the City property tax base value and the adjacent homes by providing well maintained, nice looking projects with outstanding durability. The Fire Chief has commended our project for internal sprinklers, requested and received a connection between the two cul-de-sacs, and has not voiced any other concerns. No portion of any building is more than 430 feet from a secondary access point. The Police Chief has requested well lit addresses, an ability to drive through the project and well lit drives. He has requested no parking in front of garages, which is not prohibited by the Code. Regardless, as a condidon of approval, we can work with Staff to better accommodate reasonable, consistent requirements regazding the provision of parking spaces. Motion #4, a) that Outlot A is too small for daycare which requires a lAC minimum ... 1fie proposal did have a discrepancy from the text to the plans. However, on the resubmitted plan set dated March 16, 1992, Sheet 1, the cover sheet identifies Ouflot A as 1.05 acres. The change is explained by an attached memo from Fioneer Engineering. This written response is now consistent with the submitted plans. Outlot A meets the Code. ' That the project dces not meet the requirements of Section 7.2 (8); The State of Minnesota registration will be required for operators of the final built daycare project. This proposal is only requesting a clarification and designation of land use, and sketch plan approval for the daycare use on outlot A. The letter dated March 6,1992 from R.A. Putnam outlines the steps for future development of an approved land use. This plan meets the procedural and sketch plan requirements for approval per Section 5.9 (4) of the Zoning Code. Motion item 4(b). Minimum size for streets to be 30 feet per Section 5.3(a) of the Subdivision Code; The PUD process, Section 13 clearly allows for deviations from some standards. The Rottlund project does not have design characteristics prohibited by the Uniform Building Code, the Uniform Fire Code, and does not deviate from access and circulation design dimensions already approved and functioning well in Mendota Heights and throughout the Metro. To date, we have not been contacted by Staff regazding private drive widths. We believe that deviations from what has been recently approved would be arbitrary and singled out for this project without a factual basis. The project meets previously approved standards. Motion item 4(c), fails to comply with: o Section 5.6(2)b6 and Section 5.7(b)a6. Elevations. Provided in original Feb. 4 submittal, Sheet 7 of 8, and referenced in DSU report, page 2, last paragraph. Project complies. o Section 5.6(2)b7 and Section 5.7(3)a7. Sewer and water alignment. Provided in original Feb. 4 submittal, Sheets 1 and 2 of 8, referenced in DSU report, page 3. Project complies. o Section 5.6(2)b8 and Section 5.7(3)a8. Location and candle power of luminaires. Provided in submittal of revised Sheet 2 of 9, dated March 18,1992. Locations aze shown and candle power is NSP standard for drive entrances. o Section 5.6(2)c3 and Section 5.7(3)b3. Typical Floor Plan and Room Plan. Part of original Feb. 4,1992 submittal Sheet 8 of 8, scaled to 1/4"=1'-0" on full size drawings, and added to in revised drawings Sheet 9 of 9, suitable for reductions. Project complies. o Section 5.6(2)c4 and Section 5.7(3)b4. Setbacks to all buildings in question. Provided on original submission of Feb. 4,1992 Sheet 2 of 8, shows 40' and 50' building setbacks. Project complies. o Section 5.6(2)c5 and Section 5.7(3)b5. Proposed setbacks. Shown on original submission of Feb. 4, 1992, Sheet 2 of 8, dimensioned and scaleable. Project complies. o Section 22.5(1) ... with respect to Outlot A only. An additional Condi6onal Use Permit submittal will be required for a daycare user as outlined in R.A. Putnam letter of March 6,1992. � 4 o Section 22.5(4)d ... with respect to Ouflot A only. Request for development schedule including phasing and time schedule. Project complies, outlined in R.A. Putnam letter of Mazch 6,1992. Could be under construction by late 1992. o Section 5.6(2)d6 and 5.7(3)c6. Grading Plan, proposed road profile. Shown on original Feb. 4,1992 submittal, Sheets 1 and 3 of 8. Project complies. o Section 5.6(2)c3 and 5.7(3)d3. Landscaping, location of and material used of all screening devices. The Rottlund proposal as submitted is required to screen parking areas of 6 contiguous spaces or more from the public street by not less than 75% opaque fencing. No fences over 6' aze allowed. The proposal provides more than 75% opaque screening through the use of both berms and evergreen trees. Project complies with Code. o Section 12.5(7). Parking azeas serving buildings of 3 or more units shall be screened to a 4' height from single or two family units. Screen to be masonry or wood and 85% opaque or greater. The Rotflund proposal screens lots 8, 7, 6, S, 4, and 2 from Mendota Heights Road by a 100% opaque berm exceeding 4 feet in height. Lots 1 and 2 are screened from adjacent single family lots by landscaping and existing plant materials of a shrubby nature. As a condition of approval, The Rotflund Company will work with Staff and the abutting homeowners to screen pazldng areas to a 4 foot height. We wish to note that lots 1, 2 and 3 of Mendota Woods are 20 feet above our project site in elevation. A four foot high screen on our site may accomplish very little versus an agreement to provide reasonable landscaping that will grow much taller. Project meets intent of Code based on plans submitted, Sheets 3, 5 and 6 of 9. Motion item 4(e). Parking fails to comply with 12.5(2); The project complies per original submittal dated Feb. 4,1992, Sheets 1 and 2 of 8. Per section 12.5(1), all enclosed parking spaces shall be designed with sufficient access to allow temporary parking of vehicles on the access way without interfering with access to other r ir parking spaces. Depending on interpretation, this proposal is way over parked, or is potentially 6 spaces short. As a condition of approval, The Rotdund Company is prepared to work with Staff to provide Code complying parking spaces. Project currently meets Code based on a no issue cited in the DSU and Staff inemos. Motion item 4(3). No public street abutting lots 2, 3, and 5, per Section 3.2(65); _ 1fie Rotflund proposal meets the intent and complies with this section through the use of the PUD required rezoning and through the legal condominium plat requirements of the State of Minnesota. Motion item 4f. Covenants not consistent with representation that units are "for sale." The City Codes does not require nor stipulate that any project be a"for sale" or rental project. Regardless, all Rotflund Homes projects are intended to be sold to individual homeowners. The legal language required for homeowners association documents merely protects the investment of the homeowner, no different than single family homes. The Rotdund Company will not discriminate against any homeowner on any basis, certainly not whether a future owner has the ability to rent their home. 5 Motion item 4(g). Traffic studies have not taken into account the daycare trip generation. In verbal tesfimony by Staff at the Planning Commission hearings, and in the DSU report of Feb. 25, 1992, "Traffic is not an issue," and the road system is capable of supporting commercial uses, which this proposal is clearly not. Project does not constrain any of the existing public infrastructure and in fact assists in keeping traffic well within safe trip generation limits previously calculated for the adjacent roadways. Section 5.9(4)c. Requirement for plans to be in general schematic form. The Rottlund proposal shows all uses and buildings within 350 feet of the boundary drives and indicates the distance to I-494 on Sheet 4 of 9, plans submitted March 18, 1992. Project complies with Code. mm As carefully described above, this proposal meets Mendota Heights Zoning and Subdivision Code requirements. It does not, as has been implied by Mr. Friel's motion at the Planning Commission fall short in any manner. Where the Code can be called fuzzy, or where interpretations of the Council differ from Staff, the Consultant or The Rotflund Company professional consultants and staff, the Rottlund Company will be receptive to working with City Staff to arrive at a mutually beneiicial, reasonable and legal design soludon. This proposal meets the needs of the public at large, your future constituents and our customers. This project allows for a rezoning to comply with State law, meet Metropolitan Council goals and Mendota Heights Guide Plan recommendations. This project dces not discriminate in any way against future residents via housing type and income level. This is going to be a great project with happy homeowners, in a well maintained environment, close to work and play, and will only improve with your vote to anprove the proiect rezoning. sketch plan, and CUP requests. The Rotflund Company is committed to building value into projects. The Rotflund Company has been and remains open to constructive dialog and conditions of approval that are reasonable and legal. The Rotflund Company looks forward to your motion to ap rn ove on April7th, 1992. R spectfully submitted, �� Don 7ense Vice President Land Development Manager DJ/skh MENDOTA2.doc cc: John Bannigan Richard Putnam c. s m wa �x awn r 2 � �'k� U $ � � i�`° U • I -- �' ' ��— .�; _ • --' J ` � �� I I ' Q �i -- —I BRIDGEVlENf�SHORES "� � ��` I " _� -' - " � � '' 1 3 W � �- — � 6 8 � �1 ' � .--�-_,, - J1 � -• - � �� 7 3 , w -- _� _�`- "��.1'� ,_ ' , ��I, 1 I i W I _� I; �/ � � ' c � �p �— �.. (/• ' ' �� = _�� � ` � 7 � �� \ � • /�, ' / / / `� \ `I ��� ������� 1�` '� /�m I / ' / I / , I '��1 { _ _ _ `�\ � � � / �•����i• ' � '• .� � `� `� ` j � � N I % ' � \` ; � / / i � \ �_ � � �,� ��_ -�. � i3 �' ```�-1�-.--1_' I , � =,_ �\ � i � _ �_ _ _'_ " � __ ` _'_�'� �°°� i i ^ __ ` _ � _ � � i \ - - / � _ ` _ ��- ` _� . -.�/ _" `•�� � ���__-� �ro. ' •�t��. -___- �-- 1 '____" ��--r, ' . 1-_��' _" , ,� -. - � � - � ; , T�.� '�-• . , ,- , - '�' c" � � MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD �` �� j/ .�' ,��ii' � �� ` -- _ �"— yi __ �'--�_ —•'�—�• - -- "� �' `-- -- - -_-��._wo � i :.� � i • � ' -��_- � � • _^ � ' • T, -' ----� 1 i �� � � ���'� �\ i- - ---- 1 � �\�Y����' : � � ' ' \ : ' ' � i . i ' ' :-c- �� � , ' ' \\\\\\\\\\\\ \��\\\\\ � `� ' _ , \�\`��������������`, �, � r �\\' ejO; `' ; .' i � -- ' � � � • � w•F, � j �\\ � , . \,,...wa...w,u�.4\�\' � _ 1. �\ . � ,,. , �• ; '; ^ .b � . 1 � � ' � r. ~ � i _ __ � �� \ ����y���\�� _ \ , � _ . 1 ' � .� • � t . \ \\��\�- �aV' , . � • 1' � ! � ` � r , ,,� � `-�__�__ �� •� • 7 �_ao � �V �r.u.eus• a � '� i _ � ` , � � • " ' ; i i � � -'-"- _ ' ,`` i i : � 4 , ,� ; '-� _ �` - , , __--__ _-_ i; '� r'!. ,, ' ; , � ... �I . � __ ----- - • • �, ; � 1`��'� i i i � � � • , �� � ,' ' _' �. , � � �� �i 1 1 ��` �� �__'� . I / . _ ' �' � ` _ '_' � tq�� 11 � � �..:\ � � �� � '� � � • t . ' - 1 � CA 'I: 'I a I. ,t \ «,2mA� r• ; \ \ I w. ��j `�ii� � I1 , ���,• ' • r• t � -', �,', ' ,_ - `� ' _� ' _�.r...''' y � � 11 � � _ ,j�1� � \ � ; , oo �1 �♦ ��' '� ' _' � '� �- �\ �, �' ,i ,+ �. •1 0 � � � -.,- � __,_..�._...-..._. .. O � � �A ��� il;:r � � � • �.`\ `` --- , � ` -- � ` Q ' � ' � � � ,�i��ii 1I � � �\ r. ., ------ -' 1 ' 'S�\�\\\\\������\\\����\\\� � � _ --� - : _- ,� �)`\\\` �"� � � F� � ' � ; -- � � � • ' / ' . � ��1 1 � �Y41iKt��Mf41 � \ � __ ___ _ _ �� ` " ��� ' ;,, / � � ' � `•�, � `� Ip ���ill � � ��� � ����� ��������������N ��������������_ �.1 � � � . . ,`� \' •� `\ `\```\``;. ��IIII j � _._' :_"'_""__' ' ��� ���� ` `7 I \ . ���I11 I _� _ __•�_— �� � � / • • • fn WLLiwe[ �wW • , ` '� I ���111 I / � ' ' . ..� "'_.� _"� _ __ ' � � �♦� ��i—� �li��ii i � `` OFFRAMP -- � i, 4 ����'"•' ��`,\;� 4��iii �� �� r-- __-... ' _ ._ '— ___ _\ E . n�ij��i i� //'�j ---------- --- - �- ONRAMP ��'� _ � • _ `� �/ ,� \`,`,�� `'� `Q`, . ji�hii � / I� // �_ .--- �_ " '- • `�� . `��:.�I _ ,�. O 1 � `_'-�\ il'I��� �� / • '___________ ________� ' � � � , � ' : 11�1 I � 1 : . . ;� �--� '� \ • � I 1 y�y � --' � , � r� ��. ` `�� v \ . . � i '- -� / su.w�u.r rn�n: a $ u• `��� `\� ��� , \ \�� \ C��� `�`�� 1�� �u11� � � __ _' �`�\� ♦� \ �� � ♦ � . . \ � `� �` / � • • • . lEOEND ♦ \ ♦ �� ��� . , ♦ � ♦. _� �ji '-_ _ .`� � \ ' •.w+ ��� roswaun�.nrurr \ \ � �� �.` � �`` ������. �` . � - ;�•.� \ \�, �u. awu �nero uw� \� \ � \ \ . ;; � ♦ � : �' • - �1�11111� � i i �' � � ` `` ` `` . �[. bROu �.' �` .�� � `����` `� �� �� �\`:`. . ' I 11 �t • lw i '1� , ♦ ��� • . - • 111 � "` � c.mm..eao ` �,• �\''1� ,` ``���� `�� � �` ���i 1 1 � � `�5 � ,� �.� . . , �, . . � _ � .,��. c�.c... •rna '� � �\.`�\``I ,�:���.�` �` \ �� � �1 � i ' � \� �. n. ` \ ',\`,�`��; �-�:``.: �; ` �` ` � � . i ' � Q; �_. r. .ru 4 1 �,��1`1 ,� �\� `� `� `� `� � ` • ` `�` ' e.r �\ i�l���� �� i I 11 i;\� \ �� f � MKM � � , ' � � 1 1 ``� ` r'` � � � � ri.w[ �{ 1 I I 1 �\�` _ � � 1 1 I 1 i � I � � � � � � �� �'�o •..u�. � � 1 � . �� ' �� i i ` ' ���� I � �� NON6HR � ' ````� mplrw�Nnp. ...w ..............«........w« ....... �.. �/r/�¢ .�.�. ....na• ���nu. w[tt5 .•' ""'•"•••"' ••^' ,,, ""' """" "' "" """"""' "' ' "" � THE ROTTLUND COMPANY WINTERWOOD COURTYARD HOMES � EXISTING TREE SURVEY ` m ...�,........... . . .._.... �.,. .... ._.. ._.. .__ _ ,��. g � g , _ --";.i� i . � 1.- "__' 1� 3 �r����''---__ I �� ¢ � � - _— r `�1 BRIDGEVJEV�(�SHORES "� � ___;�� _,, ---1=��_ �. ��- --�__,,�' --- -- 1' -------- _ � � % 6 ' �� � 7 �� - -� ,= - __ �,� _, - _; � , �r- ; I ; --:_ ----- - �: �, , ; , -: - =.����- . -- � -- � :�;== ., � . �� � ,; ;, �. J ' �. \ .'� ��"��`�. � / > 'i �����♦ �, 1 '.� � � .�� %' , ` ����' ```` �_ `_' -l��_ N/ ' ' ``` `, I I /' ' /' , , '__ ____ ' ' p ��. _ �,�```��` W ��' � i� 1 I�` � � � \ �' � � � —��_ -��.� ; � � � �` , � �� . � \ �_ �� ='_=-- � - T ���, �lr�r�� ���w���rr� ,r�a��7� ► . � � 0 1 -:.vo �y. }��.11�3ir. 1�+.i.+T TiN��]pr '� 2i��-U _r�-rT • �+i �� (—� � '. ` '- !('�1a�`-� � �i,��.i/ t�!.",�i �/-„'yt,j.in.�`�_�..,1� fi. rj' �:'� ! �•� R� '�. i\;`� �.��, . � �� �j � ��f 'i'r ��= �' rof Yi_,. .`�. �r �'. � � t'�� � �_�` ♦ ;� ' :�A;-' ,.` �<`;"' . I `I� � � � ' � � . � � � �iq� � �i� `�iS i.l;,y � .. \ . � _�.,:, ; �� � ����`� ��itj � � 'vr r� ry� ,��`` M ���,�. '�' �•.t� ara��::w�e� (/ z : . �• ~� �N ,` r * ,,,�, ►� l�h: �� '° ` ` .,. �L .; , . f !�ti f, s:l ��L � „� •�;� 7�. -, . ; " � - . . =/ — � �__�„"...__„ a'-''�' 4 .:`. � � rh, ���:. .1�` N _ �- �.��L�ii�.��..�.'��11j � �(I t\ll � a �Ni ��� .� �I��. �� �,� f A` �0.� �l�oti� ,�y. i�iT _ ��i. • `n' n;�- ;t�� a.• �,�: ' ` �"���t' iti ,.,� • R:�•ard: • � . . .. .,/n � �� `•. 1� ���—i� �;� F' 4`�; �- • ,� � : t1,F '''` i � ��r r.:,' j �° � � '!` s". ^ - :=I! r , ��,�/1> � p�e�vl - �� �♦ ,1�; "Irt, � ..�. ,.�j3.:.= n �,a�.I;� �' .�, �``' ;�a . �j 1 ?:ii� � � ����,�� � 'a��j� � � Y+�l�s�;:� _�'i li l � : e n �, !:%�r ,� .',�; �f� ,-�; -i7r y. , d - =���? ���; �r... ,����� '}'n>i � =16`� .�tiir.. ���• � o�S 1 �+�,,t �'"�" ,u. `,n;� ���1�� ,� r �_�I �` �� �v� `�•�6 ya � �.... � ���.� �:�� ��� � . . ""'� ,��� :$„ . �a.� .�„ � ;e °�:��,, ;<S;; ,�y'L'_ Iln �ti�lj. 'JAi:r �t .`. `+` ,�����•� � ��'�`^�a ' �y}i � y� ,.1��� �-,�' ,`� �� �E i"; . a�/�� � �� '• � � � � �� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS . MEMO � _ , • • - March 31 19�2 ' � T0: Ma.yor, Ca.ty Council, Gi�y Administr FR4M: Klay�on H. Eckles ��� � Civil Engineer . SUBJECT: Funding Mechanisms �or zvy Creek,and O�.her Storm Water Praj ects DISCUSSION At the March 17 workshop Staff and Council discussed possible �unding op�ions far the Iv� Creek drainage problem and other drainage problems in the city. The main issue facing the city i� how'to fund sys�.em wide drainage improvement� when assessments aren't feasible. S�aff presented several o�tions including a storm water utili�y, a special ta�cing distrlct, use of general fund, and a 10� sanitary sewer surcharge. Council wanted more informa�.ion on the option �hat would add a surcharge to the sani�ary sewer bi11s and raise �he general. tax Ievy, Staff has �urther deveiaped this op�ion and it appears �'easible in the following format: 1) A 10s surcharge is added to the sanitary �ewer quarterly bi.11s (effective 1993} . 2) On �he Ivy Creek project approx3...mately 20� of the costs are assessed. 3) An additional $20,000 per year in tax levy is implemented. This is necessary ta compensate far future projects where assessments might not be possible. 4) Any temporary de�icits are cushioned by the U�ility Reserve Fund. This program would be ca�able of funding orxe moderate project every few years in addi�.ion to the,Zvy Creek project. Projec�s which migh� be necessaxy in the nex� few years include LexingtonJRiverside, Va11ey Park, Frzendly Marsh, and Ma.rie Creek. Larry carried thi� program aut through the year 2012 and found that as long as we didn't have any additional problems of the magni�.ude of Ivy Creek, we could fund the an�icipated projects. As nated above, any shortfalls cauld be temporarily cavered by the Utility Reserve Fund, which -� would �hen be reimbursed in later years {sea attached �_ � spreadsheet�. :y � - 1• CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 31, 1992 T0: Mayor, City Council, City Administr FROM: Rlayton H. Eckles Ka,� 1/ Civil Engineer SUBJECT: BAR.R. Engineering Storm Water Studies INTRODUCTION BARR Engineering has been working on two storm water problems for us. On the Mendota Interchange pro�ect BARR has been helping to analyze the MN/Dot cost sharing proposal for storm sewer. It looks as if approximately $350,000 of savings will result from this work. The other area where BARR is assisting us is in the industrial park. We have an existing storm sewer system that can't handle the storm water flows generated by the industrial park. Council gave BARR. the go- ahead to help in finding a solution to the industrial park problem. BAR.R said that this analysis could be completed for approximately $4,675. The attached letter and cost estimate shows that more than this amount has already been spent, and the cost to finish the study could be another 516,200. DISCUSSION During the July 1987 "Super Storm" the Printware buildin� in the industrial park experienced severe flooding. I examined the building after the flood and found that the water level on the first floor had reached just below the top of the desks. Although the "Super Storm" was way be�ond the normal 100 year storm engineers normally use for design, it showed that the industrial park has some serious problems. Given the park is only about 65� developed, it is obvious the problem could get much worse if nothing is done. In the Local Water Management Plan that BARR is completing for the city, BARR identifies the industrial park storm sewer as a system that should be carefully studied. In the Local Water Mana�ement Plan BAR.R. estimates the cost to complete such a pro�ect at $15,000 (see attached page 51 from the Management Plan). It has always been assumed that at some point such a study would be completed. When we started looking at the Mn/Dot Interchange storm sewer � r system, we thought the system would provide a simple and cost effective way of fixing the entire industrial park storm sewer problem. Unfortunately, the analysis BARR has completed and the discussions we have had with Mn/Dot show that simply installing more pipes or one large holding pond are not practical or feasible. A more complex and comprehensive solution is required. BARR indicates in the attached letter that it could complete a study that would provide the cit� with a"Comprehensive and cost effective solution to the drainage problems in and adjacent to the Mendota Heights Industrial Park". The complexity of the problem is such that our in-house engineering capabilities would be hard pressed to provide an analysis as thorough as BARR's. To date all expenses involved in the BARR studies have been charged to the Tax Increment District. It is anticipated that all the costs of this additional work could also be charged to the District. RECONIl��NDATION Given the potential liability this problem poses to our industrial park, and given the complexity of the problem, I recommend Council pass a motion to enter into an agreement with BARR to complete a study of the industrial park storm sewer system for an amount not to exceed $16,200. Also I recommend BARR be compensated $5,087 for the work performed to date ($462 over the original estimate). ACTION REOUIRED If Council concurs with the above recommendation, Council should pass a motion directing Staff to enter into an agreement with BARR Engineering for the completion of a storm sewer study of the industrial park for an amount not to exceed $16,200, and approving the payment for work completed to date in the amount of $5,087. would they be effective at reducing nutrient inputs to acceptable levels. This study may involve development of an annual water and nutrient budget for the lake and water quality modeling of the lakes processes. Additional sampling may be required as part of this study. The 1991, estimated cost for such a study is $15,000. B. Gun Club Lake Watershed The Gun Club Lake watershed contains the majority of the City's commercial and industrial land uses. With the unperviousness related to commercial and industrial land uses, greater volumes and rates of runoff will occur than in many other pazts of the City. The capital unprovements program for this watershed will focus on studying the most cost-effective method to maintaining the desired uses of this area while remedying the watershed's stormwater quantity and quality problems. 1. Industrial Park Feasibilitv Analvsis and Preliminary Design � This Plan identifies the industrial park drainage district as an area of major concem. The potential for flooding under both existing and ultimate land use conditions may result in the inundation of existing sttuctures and/or the restricting of the utilization of additional area for industriaUcommercial uses. A feasibility analysis and preliminary design should be made of the system to determine the most applicable solution to the flooding and erosion pmblems identified in the plan. The study should address the cost vs. benefit ratio of providing additional storage in the drainage district vs. pmviding increased discharge capacity for the system. This study should involve staff at MnDOT because it may affect the proposed improvements to Highway 13. It should also provide preliminary design for recommended solutions to the floading and downstream erosion pmblems. The estimated cost of such a study is $15,000. =�.� Augusta Lake Outlet DesiQn In the future, it is the intention of the City of Mendota. Heights to provide an outlet for Augusta Lake. An initial scoping study should be completed to determine areas suitable for pump installation, power facilities and other considerations. This study should address costs involved in purchasing equipment, operating budgets and maintenance considerations. The estimated cost of such a study would be $15,000. 51 Barr Engineering Company 8300 Norman Center Drive Minneapolis, MN 55437-i026 Phone: (612) 832-2600 Fax: (612) 835-0186 Mr. Ji.m Danielson Public Works Director City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Re: Mendota Interchange Dear Jim: March 26, 1992 It is my understanding that you would like Barr Engineering Company (Barr) to examine additional options for the industrial park drainage issue. This letter summarizes the work completed to date on this project and the proposed work and cost estimate to look at the additional options. This letter concludes with a brief discussion about the status of the existing budget. I. Work Completed During the Mendota Heights City Council meeting on December 3, 1991, the Council asked Barr to examine options for controlling the flooding at the Mendota Heights Road/Pilot Knob Road intersection. Barr submitted a proposal on December 10, 1991 which included: 1. One meeting with Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) personnel and follow up meeting with city staff. Time was included to address comments by MnDOT. 2. Options for solving the flooding problems at the Mendota Heights Road/Pilot Knob Road intersection and 10 copies of a short report on the results. 0 . ., 0 Mr. Ji.m Danielson March 26, 1992 The following work was performed: Page 2 1. A meeting with MnDOT occurred on December 11, 1991 at the MnDOT offices in Oakdale. A follow-up meeting occurred at the Mendota Heights City Hall after the MnDOT meeting. 2. Several ponding scenarios for the industrial park were modeled. These scenarios were modeled assuming that the industrial park was fully developed. The options were modeled on the request of City staff or were needed to respond to MnDOT's comments. We used the SWAMP model, developed at Barr, for this purpose. The SWAMP model was necessary because it can si.mulate the pressurized flow conditions that occur in the Industrial Park storm sewer during major storm events. Included in this work was preli.minary storm sewer sizing and pond gradings. Options studied include: . Placing several medium-sized ponds in strategic locations throughout the industrial park area. . Placing one pond northeast of the Mendota Heights Road/Pilot Knob Road intersection (�Printware' Pond). . Placing a large pond on the Pabst site, northwest of the intersection, adjacent to the new Highway 13 alignment. . Constructing a pond in the ravine adjacent to Cray Research, immediately east of the new T.H. 13. Also included in the time billed were phone conversations with MnDOT and City staff for exchanging data and responding to comments. An additional meeting was held with MnDOT on February 24, 1992 at the Mendota Heights City Hall. Mr. Jim Danielson March 26, 1992 , Page 3 Results of the analysis were discussed with City staff and MnDOT. As a result of these discussions, it was found that none of the options studied would be an acceptable solution or cost effective. Therefore, the City would like Barr to examine additional options. The proposed work scope is summarized below. II. Proposed Work The City has requested that we perform the following studies regarding the industrial park drainage issues: 1. Estimate the amount of storage that is required to protect the flood prone buildings under existing conditions. The ponds would be assumed to flow into the main storm sewer system and would be considered 'local' versus 'regional' detention areas which were studied in the previous analyses. r 2. Determine if there is a benefit in requiring no net increase in # runoff rates from undeveloped areas. 3. Determine if it is feasible and/or beneficial to divert storm water to the LeMay Lake watershed or to the MnDOT pond adjacent to T.H. 55. 4. Determine where storage is needed within the industrial park to protect it from flooding under full development conditions. It is our understanding that it should be assumed that all water would be discharged from the industrial park through the existing Cray outlet (with the exception of the LeMay Lake option) and that increasing the discharge at the Cray outlet by increasing the capacity of the storm sewer is to be prevented. The City has also requested that the results be on a'conceptual basis.' Another factor that we should consider is that the 100 year flood level adjacent to the Mendota Heights Road and Pilot Rnob Road intersection : .y Mr. Jim Danielson March 26, 1992 Page 4 should be approximately 828.0 so that some freeboard is given to the low building adjacent to it (slab elevation = 829.4). This work scope proposes to find a comprehensive and cost effective solution to the drainage problems in and adjacent to the Mendota Heights Industrial Park. The document produced as part of this study will provide a plan for the future development of the drainage system within and adjacent to the industrial park. We also understand that the city is under a time restraint to reach an agreement with MnDOT so that construction on the Mendota Interchange project can proceed. Therefore, to meet this time restraint, this study will be split into two phases: 1) A preliminary study to provide enough information so that MnDOT can develop their final plans for the Highway 13 ; and 2) a comprehensive plan which summarizes all of the options examined and provides a recommended solution. It is recommended that this second portion be placed in the City's Surface Water Management Plan. For the preliminary part of the plan (Phase 1), Barr proposes to determine the hydrologic/hydraulic parameters necessary to allow MnDOT to proceed in their designs. The information may include 10- and 100-year peak discharges at inflow points to the MnDOT system. To determine this information, a preliminary hydrologic analysis using existing land use conditions will be performed to determine if the development of ponding on undeveloped parcels will be adequate to control flooding at the Pilot Knob Road/Mendota Heights Road intersection for full development conditions. Additional preliminary analysis will be performed if it appears that ponding on undeveloped parcels will not serve to fully prevent flooding at the intersection. The detailed location of ponds and possible diversions will not be given in this phase of the study. This information will be provided in a memorandum to the City {:iQyldl[' 7 1 M ai- i n� —T Is`1.'�`r'6`�K . .. Y Mr. Jim Danielson March 26, 1992 Page 5 The steps Barr proposes to follow in developing a comprehensive solution to the drainage problems within the industrial park (Phase 2) are given below. A. Barr will determine if a solution to the problem may be to prohibit developers from increasing the flow from their property over what occurs under existing conditions. The ponds constructed on these currently undeveloped parcels would be assumed to flow into the main storm sewer system and would be considered 'local' versus 'regional' detention areas. To determi.ne if this is a potential solution to the flooding problem, the following procedures will be performed: 1. Existing land uses will be identified. 2. Subwatersheds will be delineated so that undeveloped areas can be isolated in the hydrologic model. 3. Hydrographs for all subwatersheds will be developed using the Barr Watershed Model. The 10- and 100-year events will be analyzed with durations of 1/2 hour to 30 days. 4. The subwatershed hydrographs will be routed through the drainage system using the SWAMP model. Existing ponding conditions will be assumed. If this analysis shows that no significant flooding occurs, there will be a benefit in requiring no net increase in runoff from undeveloped areas. If this is the case then the following data will be provided: 1. Required 100 year detention storage volumes and maximum discharge rates will be calculated for undeveloped parcels. General locations Mr. Jim Danielson March 26, 1992 Page 6 of ponds and their watersheds will be identified. The discharge rates will be equal to the undeveloped rates. 2. Pipe sizes used in the modeling will be tabulated. s 3. Rough cost estimates for the ponding will be given. It will be assumed that the land is valued at $2.50 per square foot. Otherwise, if the model shows that unacceptable flooding at the intersection occurs under existing land use and drainage conditions, a second analysis will be performed. All subwatersheds from undeveloped areas will be removed from the model. By removing undeveloped parcels, it can be determined if flooding would occur due to the existing developed parcels. If the results of the modeling indicate that flooding would occur even if the entire volume of runoff from undeveloped areas is stored, there will have to be some additional control of storm water from developed areas, these controls could be: 1. A pond located northwest of the intersection to store surcharged flows from the storm sewer system. This pond would probably be smaller than the one originally proposed at this site (32 acre- feet) if ponds are required to be placed on the undeveloped parcels. 2. Increased storm sewer capacity from the intersection to the Cray Research outlet. 3. Construction of storm water detention basins on developed parcels. 4. Diversion of flows to LeMay Lake and/or to the T.H. 55 MnDOT pond �. Y Mr. Jim Danielson March 26, 1992 Page 7 5. Diverting flows from developed parcels to ponds constructed in currently undeveloped parcels. Some of these controls, such as development of basins on developed parcels may be financially unacceptable. Increasing discharges down the Cray outlet may be unacceptable to Mn/DOT and the Minnesota DNR. Therefore, acceptable controls will be proposed along with a rough esti.mated cost . B. Barr will determine if it is feasible and/or beneficial to divert storm water to the LeMay Lake watershed or to the MnDOT pond adjacent to • T.H. 55. The following procedures will be followed to determine the benefit of this option: 1. Full development conditions will be assumed. The 10 and 100 year events will be analyzed with duration of 1/2 hour to 30 days. 2. Areas which could potentially be diverted will be identified. 3. The effect on storage volumes and/or flood levels due to the diversion will be estimated for two cases: a. The storm water is directly diverted to LeMay Lake. b. The storm water is directly diverted to the MnDOT pond. 4. The effectiveness of the diversion to prevent flooding at the Pilot ICnob Road/Mendota Heights Road intersection will be estimated. 5. Estimated pipe sizes and a rough cost estimate will be given. ♦ y Mr. Jim Danielson March 26, 1992 Page 8 The options for solving the drainage problems in the industrial park will be discussed in the Phase 2 part of the industrial park plan. The discussion will include a summary of other options which were previously studied, including large ponds on the Pabst site and on vacant parcels northwest of the Mendota Heights Road/Pilot Knob Road intersection (Printware site). The benefits and cost of solution or combination of solutions will be given and recommendations will be given. The estimated cost to perform the above work is $16,200. However, the final cost would be less if the results of the existing conditions analysis show that limiting discharges from undeveloped parcels will be an acceptable solution. Included in the scope of work is two meetings with City staff and 10 copies of a 10 to 20 page report. The report will contain approximately 2 or 3 figures. The cost estimate is broken down by scope items and personnel in the enclosed table. It is proposed that Barr will perform the above work on a time and expenses basis with a total billing not to exceed $16,200. Barr will notify the City before work continues if is anticipated that total billings will exceed $16,200. We will commence work when given approval by the City. I briefly want to discuss the budget for the previous portion of this project. Certain unexpected work resulted from comments made by MnDOT and requests from City staff. The unexpected work resulted in greater costs in time and expenses than was anticipated in the December 10 cost estimate. The cost estimate for the previous work scope was $4,625. Additional work beyond the original work scope included: 1. Preparation and attendance of ineeting with City staff and representatives of Mn/DOT on February 24, 1992. 2. Preparation of letter to Ken Miller of MnDOT regarding hydrologic and hydraulic data regarding the "Pabst" and "Cray" ponds and outlets. Mr. Jim Danielson March 26, 1992 Page 9 3. Hydrologic/Hydraulic analysis of single pond in industrial park, northeast of the Pilot Knob Road/Mendota Heights road intersection to determine land and excavation requirements. The total billable time and expenses for this project to date is approximately $5,817, approximately $1,192 over the esti.mate. Because $730 was budgeted for a report in the December 10 proposal, the actual amount billable is $462 since a report was not produced. Because the items listed above were beyond the original scope of work presented to the City, we respectively request that the City consider payment of $462 for the these items. Thank you for giving us this opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have any questions, please contact Tim Anderson or myself. Sincerely, Dennis E. Palmer Vice President DEP:tja Enclosure 23\19\210\MH3.LTR V S � � ' Y BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Cost Estimate for Industrial Pazk Plan -- March 25, 1992 • Time Estimate (hours) TASK ob Tim Dennis Tech/ Word Expenses Total eduhn Anderson Palmer Cadd Processin Cost $50/hr $65/hr $110/hr $45/hr $35/hr Task A—Onsite Ponding/Dischazge Limits Identifrcatias ofland Uses 3 0 0 $150 Subwatershed Delineation 3 1 0 $215 De►�elopmentofHydrographr 3 1 0 $30 $245 SWAMPMateling 32 6 0 $320 $2,310 CartE�TirnatelDataSw�un�y 6 2 0 $80 $510 Additional Madeling (if needed) 30 6 0 $?AO $2.130 Meeti»,qwithCity 3 3 3 1 $20 $730 R toCo»vnents 6 6 1 1 $835 SUBTOTAL 83 25 4 2 $690 $6,975 Task B—Diversions Ider�aaiion of m�eas 4 2 0 $330 Full DevelopmauCarditronrHydrology a. diversiontoLeMayLake 20 4 0 $200 $1,460 b. diversion to MnDOT pond 20 4 0 $200 $1,460 Cast Fstrnwte/Dc�a Swronary 6 2 1 1 $575 SUBTOTAL 50 12 1 1 $400 $3,825 DraftReport 8 12 2 8 4 $100 $2,d00 Meeti�qwithCity 5 5 2 $20 $815 RespardtoC�s 8 4 1 4 1 $160 $1,145 FrrwlReport 4 8 1 8 2 $180 $1,440 SUBTOTAI- 25 29 6 20 7 $460 $5,400 TOTAL 158 66 11 20 10 $1,550 $16,200 d:�nendota�nh3.wq1 CITY OF MENDOTA I3EIGHTS T :� • Apri12, 1992 TO: Ma.yor, City Council and City Adminis t FROM: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager 5UBJECT: Kensington Park . - ' Approval of Final Pla��,.and ordering Advertisement for Bids � � +,,� . �y + � DISCUSSION: �� -�� � � , �;:,; s• , Preliminary plans were last presented to Council on 7anuary 21, 1992. T�e Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed and approved all aspects of the park plans at their February and March regular meetings. Attached is a general plan of the south park improvements, the landscape plan for the parking area and schematics of the buildi.ng and shelters. With the experience gained during the past several years of park construction, staff feels confident that a subst�ntial savings (5 � to 10 � of total construction costs) can be realized if the City acts as the General Contractor for the construction of the park improvements as well as the building conshuction. Individual contracts will be 1et for items such as landscaping, bituminous �paving, fencing, utility conshuction etc. Staff has on previous pmjects, provided inspections, construction oversight and suivey so the additional iime required to general the project will only increase staff time commitment by 10 % or 15 °b . FINAL PLAN CONCEPTS: 1. Picnic shelters and Concession/Restroom Buildi.ng. � Arclritectural plans and specifications for the picnic shelters aad the concession/restroom building have been completed by Station 19 Architects. Madifications to - the preliminary plans requested by Council at its Jaauary 21, 1992 meeting were incorporated into the final design. Parks and Recneation Commission reviewed and appmved the final drawings at its March 10, 1992 meeting. 2. Preliminary Utility Consttuction. _ � To serve the park site additional watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer structures must be constr.ucted by the contractor installing the utilities for Centex. Staff has worked with Centex to design the improvements needed to serve the park which will "dead end" at the park boundary. The City will contract separately for the necessary utility lines within the park boundaries. Centex has submitted an estimate of $11,905.25 and requests the City issue a purchase order to cover the cost of this additional utility work (see attached letter and cost estimate). 3. Rough Grading of North and South Park Areas. Council has previously issued purchase order in the amount of $15,000 to Centex to —� perform rough grading of the park site to accommodate the future pazk desiga. This also _ iacluded the stock piling of 6000 cubic yards of topsoil for use in the park. A second purchase - order for $2,8Q0 was issued to excavate a low.wet area and to salvage as much blackdirt as possible. � 4. North Park Improvements. These improvements will consist of fiae grading of flat open area, spreading of topsoil and seeding area. In addition a trail connecting Mendota. Heigh� Road will run along the east park boundary and connect to the south park improvements. � 5. South Park Improvements. The south park will be fully developed. The improvements include: utilities, paved parking� 1ot, two irrigated soccer fields, play equipment, concrete walks, bituminous tiails, extensive landscape plantings, protec�ive fencmg and miscellaneous park amenities. . � � COST PSTIlVIATE: Rough Grading & Top S oil (by Centex) $17, 800 Utilities Outside Park area. (by Centex) $11,900 North Park: Fine Grading T�urf Establishment Trail Connection South Park Fine Gradi.ng/Spread topsoil T�rf Establishment 6.2 acres Sod: 3650 square yards Iirigation for fields Regular Fencing Goal Fencing Parking Lot (77 stalls) Goals, bleachers, etc. Utilities inside park Play Equipment Trails & Walks Landscaping Signage Electric Service & Parking Lights Building & Shelters (Station 19 Est.) Total: 29,700 $ 7,700 $10,500 $10,000 $40,000 $15,500 $ 4,600 $20,000 $18,000 �$14,0(?0 $42,350 $18,250 $22,000 $20,000 $17,000 $20,000 $ 3,0(?0 $ 7,000 $72,000 361,900 Contingency 10°b $ 36,200 Engineering, Overhead, Inspections 15 �$ 54,300 TOTAL: 482,100 RECOMIV�NDATION: �.��.. . ; �,,, �'i The Parks and Recreation Commission unanimously recommended that the City Cvuncil approve the Kensington Park plans according to the preliminary plans they reviewed and approved and further recommend that City Staff act as General Contcactor for all proposed improvements to be constructed in this park. � r ACTIONS REOUII2ED: 1. If Council so desires, they should pass a motion accepting the final plans and specifications for Kensington Park improvements and direct staff to act as General Contractor for all construction aspects of the project aad to advertise for bids based upon the plan. 2. If Council so desires, they should direct staff to issue a purchase order in the amount of $11,906.25 to Centex for the construction of utilities to serve the Kensington Park -- site. � CE � IIo Dcsigned (ortoday. Built fortornorrow. r March 20, 1992 Mr. Jim,Danielson ,� . . City of Mendota Heights : ��,� � 1101 Victoria Curve � � ` ` Mendota Heights, MN 55118 � ° '� g '� � �'�''� . .• � �' . :�� . Re: Kensington"P.U.D. 2nd Addition ' , City share of improvements Dear Mr. Danielson: Enclosed is a summary of costs for work to be constructed with our project for the City Park. Please review and process a purchase order for this work as soon as possible. Our contractor intends to start work this spring on the storm sewer outside of the street areas and will need to know soon what materials to order. Sincerely, • CENTE*K HOMES ���• � �..sr- - Daniel A. Blake Land Development Manager \DOC\MH0320JD � Baker Techno{ogy Plaza� 5929 Bake� Road, Suite 470. Minnetonka, c..:��..... � :.,,.....,, lt ............. . . ' �: r�. . "'"'�'��`` � � r:�;.•.:��- � x�'; "`'�,.+ . � � - �e; L?.'"; _ \-:+jY1'� x ;; ._ ..�;.r���;•, - _ .: . 'L, ¢r411 w�'� - ' s�:', ::z ,:: � ��� `'� �:-:�i,. r` ;�• �,"�:.' : �< . � � �':t;.: . . _ . . !�i.. .,i_ :ENSINGTQN PUD 2ND ADDITION 20-Mar-92 :ity of Mendota Heights �hare of develapment costs � EST UNIT TEM i; LTNIT QTY PRICE --__=,______�____________________ ________ ________ __ _ __ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ ANITARY T{3 PARK " PVC Sanitary Sewer L.F. 17Q 12.60 , i ATER TO PARK " DIP'WateXmain L.F. 55 11.55 " Valve EACH�ry 1 357.00 "x4" Reducer E1�G�� 3 94.5Q "`Plug EACH 1 63.00 3just�Valve Box �EACH -�j 131.25 i � )DITIONAL STORM FOR PARK i" RCP Storm Sewer L.F. 47 22.05 �tchbasin/Manhole EACH 2 787.50 ttra Depth � Mii L. F. 3.1 52 . 5 Q :'ORM QUTF.ALI. UPS I Z E �" RCP, Storm Sewer L.F. �" RCP, Storm Sewer L.F, '" RCP Storm Sewer L.F. 1"' RCP� Storm Sewer L. F. ';' Apron wlTG EACH !" Apron w/TG � EACH I �TIiRE-BERGQUIST PLAN REVISIONS :vise Design HOUR �afting HOUR �ntractor Coordination HOUR �mputations for Staking ii4UR .NTEX COORDINATION ENII�CITYUTIL I -58Q 58Q -I10 iio 1 . : , 22.05 26.75 26.75 29.40 4Q0.00 525.00 65.00 55.00 45.00 85.00 AMOUNT 2142.Q0 635.25 357.00' 94.50 63, �.�r.,,,'�`. a-�-2:-�°0�. ���3�:��s 2036.35 1575.00 162.75 -12789.00 15512.10 -2941.95 3234.00 -40t} . 00 525.00 �so.00 4�0.00 135.U0 510.00 10943.50 1p94.p0 i2037.50 -r3t. 25" � 1 �9oG;�,�' €' March 11, 1992 S T A T I 0 N Guy Kullander N I N E T E E N City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 � Re: Kensington Park Estimatg • . , . . , ,,� Dear Guy: ' `�` � ; : . °¢�. ;-;,�: Thank you for sharing the costs on Mendakota Park buildings. It was .real� helpful to compare actual numbers to estimated and helped confirm numbers fo�°this estimate. I have cornpleted a cost estimate for the Kensington Park Comfo�t Station and Picnic � Shelters. As a reminder, the City budget for al! thr.ee structures was $60,000 to $70,000. � The cost estimate �ange is as follows: � 15°� Above Comfort Station $63,250 Pichic Shelter $13,800 Picnic Shelter 13 800 Total $90,850 Estimated $55,000 $12,OQ0 12 040 $79,000 15% Below $46,750 $10,200 10 200 $67, i 50 The estimate amount above also includes $3,000 for two parking lot .lights and about $4,000 for exterior concrete slabs around the Comfort Station and to fhe Picnic Shelters. Subtracting these two items, it provides a range of $60,000 to $84,000, with a median price of $72,000. If you. recall the cost estimates from Mendakota Park, we had a range of $98,000 to $128,000, with a median price of $113,a0a. The actua) cost was about $108,600. I hope these estimates are not discouraging as these structures are more unique in appearance and you have established a level of quality for future maintenance costs to be kept to a minimum. �If we need to look into some alternates, whether now or after bidding, we would be happy t'o do so. One thcught about the construction industry is that it is a good time to bid, as it appears that many people are looking for work and might result in lower prices that listed above. ,; • If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ar To stad, CSI oject Manager STATION NINETEEN ARCHITECTS, INC. 2001 UNIVERSITY AVENUESOUTHEAST M�NNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA55414 612 623.1800 F/�C 623.0012 ARCHRECTS, PIANNERS, INTEflIOHS � _ "� �.: i, �W�c vu�w� ( � � ' �� ' i I . .� 4 • . f i • • } � � .. • . . +. . . . I � '. _ti.r.�.���:,'�'����. ''' ; ��� ! �����ti:���':, �''�����-t'r�:�� iJ � K , i . � . ( V _ � �� t � ��� • __ / �Y�%� _ / , � � �wr���"�ia+.e,;:e.:^..:•.. :..s._ =��i �. �•. � .r �: � -' ��' �e!�` _ �"' r � , '_� ' �j �,��� a► - . , , �� mv �`- , � � 1 �� � /n "� / % :611 �� � � � Si � � !� v ��'•; � ,�+• f' _ �Ii,.,_ _ . :T-���� �i,.s� � � � �''� �i� �a r . , ry . � «1�11 a . � 1, r'""� i�� ..c�.-�.. .T,,, t����� y�`�'� }. �...rNl�l � � _.�� � �•- ., ,: � ;�::y v ;� . ,� "iE;�i :�ISI ., _' � ^,.+.�v �i ����='�= �; ,a, • ..�.,.. � �:.�.. � �...� � �� �:����.��.�� `��� v� ` � y 4 t�i ;. _i���. � (� , r � _�,� I t� i� �':� i..�� � � � — � � �jj�a?�a;-ta. ,L""'�.�-^�+.,.: � �: • { � � � � f a` , •.i= �.1 � �+t•�, !�1 ��"� _��� �j� • ��i�� , �__".��'"�" �" .3�����1��•' ����° I'+^_'�,:'�...<! .1E�'�S+�O ��,�;;a',�',+,. • t, . 2'�"�.. �-=�� � l,.r � ��� �� I(I ��L'w'."` i� t, � �� �� j o .. , - � i � � : � a� � �_ � �l �_ '� _ .�__ � F � i � ' � I ; I �/b"fLYWA�p SHf.A,"TNI1�6� ` � ~ O�tl�6R��'S�OP�p�M6M*Rpr1E . . � Ib'�f�D GE�t�R SNft�c� ( w/5Yt" exrow� � StOPED ME,M6RPc��. , vo�� �r � v� sr�r-na�- i I ,� , � � �. � __.. . i • , T �y y. . � 1 � � _.�_ � � . � . x I':� "— . � ' ,�J � � .___...�- �t��a.� � /`� '�/fi T�CTUttED J'L.YWmQ �%E-]t yoFFtT�Y GF.iUNG :6�.:;;�. �, � Z�GbD'�w}M=� LAM�t.lAZ6D B�P�! - �"'�'� FRAM�Nc� �' 'fOt oF �rb" �p�t1 „ti � � � �l'�tND � 5 Fi�IZ #�ri �5 G�NT. �1�':� y"iL=$!� �t!'4'E R� Nof�S �"a�-E� � 4:NE ap Ra�t4 F11t� ��---�'Sta�#c PIeRDEYa*iD b" Rat.K �pLE Go�.tG, ' • �-•.•�,.,BJ�LOGIC W�/ NN7:GE�h1i EVEFY b7H�,+OLICSE .� �,ENia 15�D fl61.�c N/�4Ahi � 4M GOhTG, SLAD W(�oxO- W1•� �G4lcoa�� 1a . ' ' ' �rt4 FDlC Q�IP�F�cY + ld7. t '� t ii/1 � WP:/ �:i"1/�� •X � X X • •r--�-+--Z . •i• • • ,+r • •K - r-X.' '�'�/• � �� • ��'�, �i . iOt� �t-i£���fR�V�I. i •� . • _It FOU � IOH1��0o{�� �}_ _ � •• � �?N GOl3G. $t�OG�jG 7 �o� o�r h� µP � �'oUMD^.Tlohl s�x t�uNv�nor� rp � � � iOP OF FG+oTI l�Ca [^ � . � E1+.5� `'.�.CJf10}�� � .� :�„ •� 4."x 12" Go��• PoaTIr�C� 'L_ � . � w/2- tr 5�s corrr• WI�G� ��11� � GG�M�t��T �T�TIa� � . � ,� �°�� F°'� �t/s F� �P' C.�oU R5E • _: TY�'IG�I. �� �l�E � ���G�IG� �}-I.���i�- . 0 . <"o � � O n _Q 'N . . _ � ��o�P�� �I.�vAT�lo�-1 . j 8 . . r=�i � t�'-o �t'-a �_._. �—__.. —� —,_._ —. —w_^..._ �a � -• ' 3 � .`� . � �i � } . �3 �r',�� � \� ' � �.H� \ .} � � i`itY t�� p� 5 i J �\ � �r=JAs���� I �` s� �%'�/► i isl v Row�. � `✓ � �ownN +r�, � l . � , �U�" s�� , i t � IoG ' l07 � E � a ,, � . . ' ' TYf' I 0 I. ' ��`` :� I 4,�cor�c-� st� w��•�c� � �.� . ,: ;; � , � {^�1.4 x Wl•4 h�•I.lhi. ' . A3 . � � . � I ,�^.� � %�` I � � I � �``rrr- r-r�n 3-�k-�= �z � � � �`�/ j 341�sAY �s 5 x 2.'-6• EI�cN � �' I ' �� � :� I L- �.— --�=.__... _� � � ���Pi�Nt��, St����ER:�:FOU�VDATtGIN _ & F�.00►R PLAN �. "... — ' � �—"� Ltto#�}1'lt�-1G �i�aD �Y diH�S : , ` .�. i� A � . i ���������•.�?���� �• �� ���� .. . . . 1 ..,. _ . . ,, . , . .. � r � . � � 213L'1�f� �Ij��l� � �31� 'l�d�I��L �t 41: 3o"K�s�tic :9�oN � . , \ . � �ttulM N3�MlAQ , , •. ' •, fbl�F{lp �/►3 � ., ���A lj^�Ivf"21�o+i d�1�4�d , . , • . .; • , ' ����9 � . . ' L �dN � - I}� Nol1'13J�� ' , �• r:+ ' � hN�917�d031{(Idr149 • . d3�d� �l'�o��% x�8'�$ . . \ �Id � �I�J�df' l,.l .w � � . �� �N�N►��� �� �°"'�ir �`i��i�d-e" a w rWt N� • • i L - � ' ��s•� Lr� �� • • 1 1 a ���� �� : •�. . �ui n ��1�mnr%°� \ � •'� aa°►�� :. 51�i�A %,-g �I�,�o19 3��Vio�zl Hgl 1 �l3A�5?1t�J��� ;o-,Z � ,; CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MIIVIO March 25, 1992 TO: Mayor, City Council and City A''s FROM: Shawn Sanders � 5 SUBJECT: Traffic Counts Mendota Heights Road/Dodd Road INTRODUCTION: Engineering staff was directed to investigate traffic volumes, and with the results, study the justification of traff'c light installation at the intersection of Mendota Heights Road and Trunk Highway 149 (Dodd Road). DI5CUSSION: Traffic counters were set up along Mendota Heights Road on the east and west side of Dodd Road for a 48 hour period, and the following traffic counts were obtained: Average daily traffic Peak hour - morning Peak hour - eveni.ng West of Dodd 3254 521 (7-8 A.M.) 372 (3-4 P.M.) East of Dodd 1748 168 ('/-8 A.M.) 157 (5-6 P.M.) Next, the traffic counts were analyzed, with the warrants established in the Minnesota. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (1VIl�T MUTCD), to see if installation of a traffic S1gI1� 1S jUS�1P.(�. There are 11 MN MUTCD warrants, and one or more of these warrants must be met in order for justification of a traffic signal. For this study, we shall use the requirements for a City having a population less than 10,0{}0 and each approach to the intersection having two or more lanes. Using these two guidelines, traffic exceeds the min;mum requirements on the following warrants. Needed Warrant 1- Minimum Vehicular Volume 140 Wanant 2- Intenuption of Continuous 70 Measured 148 148 Keep in mind that a traffic count was not taken for podd Road and must be included and taken simultaneously with Mendota Heights Road, in order to satisfy any of the wartants. Further investigation of this intersection is needed, and should be performed by Mn/DOT. They will be able to take into consideration all factors required to justify the installation of traff'ic signals. Enclosed you will find the following additional information; a letter submitted last year from Mn/DOT rejecting the City's request for traffic signals. Included with this letter is a traff'ic accident report recorded by Minnesota State Patrol; the traff c counts taken this year on Mendota Heights Road; a Mendota Heights Road Accident experience from the Mendota Heights Police Department (NOTE: These accidents are not included in State Patrol's Report) and a description of MN MUTCD warrants. RECOI��IlVIENDATION: In order to have a complete investigation of traffic at this intersection, staff recommends that Council approve staff's request to have Mn/DOT re-evaluate the safety at the Dodd RoadlMendota Heights Road intersection. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with staff's recommendation they should direct staff to ask Mn/DOT to investigate the intersection and report their findings back to the City. SS:dfw Minenesota Department of Transportation Me#ropolitan District Transporta#ion Butiding St. Paut, Minnesota 55155 Oakdale Qffice, 3485 Hadtey Avenue North, C3akdale, Minnesata 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Galden Valley, Minnesota 55422 Reply to Oakdale Office Telephone No. 779-1121 ! March 8, 1991 Mr. James Danielson Director of Fublic Warks City of Mendota Heights 11Q1 Victoria Curve l�endota Heights, Mi.nnesata 5511$ Dear Mr_ Danielson: S[IBJR��: C.S. 19iT T_H. 149 at Mendota Heights Road We have re-evaluated the safety of the T.H_ 149 at Mendota Heights Rnad i.nterseetion_ Based upon the data that we have colleeted, it is our judgeuient that traffic signals are not justified at this ti.me. 'i As part of aur study we performed 48 hour a:ppraach oounta, AM and PM turning mavement counts, and measured delay an the Mendota Heights approaehes.i A revisw of the 48 hour caunts shaws •ihat nane of the traffic signal warrants are met at this intersection. The delay to Mendota Heights Road vehicles is Iow_ We found that the average delay per vehicle during the FM (4:34-5:30) peak haur was 4.5 seconds and the delay during the 2:45 - 3;45 PM period was 5 seconds. ' We evaluated the accident e�cperience for this i.ntersectian from January'1, 1985 through December 31, 1990_ Dur3.ng this five year period, 15 accidenta occurred. Five accidents happened in 1985, none in 1986, none in 1987, one'in 1988, three in I989, and six ir� 199{}. Twelve of the I5 accidents are righi a�ngle accidents. The majority of the acaident� involve southbound T.H. 149 and eastbound Mendo�Ga Heights Road vehicles. We are not able to identify any pattern i.n the time of day or day of week theae accidents occurred_ ' I offer the foliowing information on justification for the installation af traffic signals to further explain our decision. The justification af the installation of a traffic signai invaives the review of many factors, including traffic volumes, geometrics, accident data, congestian motorist delay, and sigh� distance_ . 5ignal warrants defi�e the minimvm conclitians under whieh traffic signals may be installed. Whil,e traffic signals should not be installed unl.ess ane 'ar more nf the twelve signal warrants are met, the satisfacti.on af a signal warrant daes not mean that a signal must be instalied_ .An Eaual Opporiunitv Employer � Mr. James Danielson Page Two March 8, 1991 There is a perception that traffic signals eliminate all accidents; this perception is heightened by the fact that the accident experience can be dramatically reduced, following the installation of a traffic signal, at an intersection that has a high accident rate. However, traffic signals are not always the solution to traffic problems at an intersection_ They can, in fact, significantly increase the accident frequency at an intersection which has a relatively low accident rate. This has heen shown by before/after studiea conducted at intersections following signalization. One indication of the need for signalization is the occurrence of five or more reported accidents, of the type correctable by a signal, over a twelve month period. This ia one of the criteria of Signal Warrant 6, the accident warrant, and ia a threahold of accidents, below which the installation of a traffic signal generally increases the overall incidence of rear-end accidents at an interaection, and the right angle type accidents that do occur are sometimes more severe_ This is why it is extremely important that traffic signals are installed judiciously, and that the current accident experience at an intersection is reviewed thoroughly. Generally, overall delay at an intersection is increased following the inatallation of a traffic signal. This is due to both the clearance intervals required in the signal ti.mi.ng cycle.�and the need to maintain progression on the maiu arterial roadway. We receive many complaints regardi.ng "excessive" delay on cross-streets where signals have been installed to improve safety. When average motorist delay at an intersection during peak periods is less than 30 seconds, generally motorists can expect more delay following the installation of a signal. We are concerned with the increase in accidents during 1990. We will continue to monitor the operation of this intersection and we will implement the appropriate corrective measures as necessary. In conclusion, it is our opinion that the overall safety at this intersection would decrease if a traffic signal were installed at this time. Attached for your information are copies of the data we collected as part of our study. Included are copies of the warrant analysis form, a collision diagram for the five year period, and a summary of the delay study results_ If you wish to discuss any portion of this atudy, please contact Bruce Kastner, District Traffic Studies Supervisor at 779-1126. Sincerely, Mary B LaPlante, P_S. District Traffic Bngineer d � . Mn/pOT 2942 (&78) Collision Diagram Minnesota Department of Transportation Location• - �vn /� r�t''9 �wt H �� 9 � %%%dr��o7�x �.�ci5 ii7t5 Time Period: ����-s "" �?���90 Prepared by: �� D�e: � No. of A . � Indicate North N � b �J � M �''' �, A a V t: � � � �" i /1 p (� � v ` ,� r h /1 �0 �O H ^' � W v � a . � � b � N w J 6 i � � 4 \ � / . / � `r � Q d V \ ,^i �O �I P ` V ` v � (J � P �' V p J 0, „ � � � � } V �, J C � � n • p „ �1 N � hV 8 i.-n-rs(zi) 3•3-55 �ol�� ��_D C L- S- O /-//- 90 �i7 8 t-�-D 5-3�-to�1� C o-c_D /%%endo-�a /���fS —� Motor Vehicle Moving Ahead {�(-� Motor Vehicle Backing Up av� Motor Vehicle Out of Control � Pedestrian � BiFycle/Moped ; Motorcycle [,J Fixed Object O Fatal Acc. Property Damage Acc. � A Injury Acc. --�j Rear End Property Damage � B Injury Acc. . Right Angle Q C Injury Acc. � B Injury a s� ' Fatal = � � A Injury � Q ' e Injury = 3 C Injury = � Injury Total � 8 Property Damage � r% Total Acc. _ /S �, ii-r-a� %s) ��-y i T..y /�y � , , Light: L= Daylight (1) DN = Dawn (2) Du = Dusk (3) D= Dark (4, 5 or 6) X = Unknown Weather: Surface: C= Clear or Cloudy (1 or 2) D= Dry (1) R = Rain (3) W = Wet (2) S= Snow or Sleet (4 or 5) S= Snow or Ice (3 or 4 X= Other or Unknown X= Other or Unknown Example of Bicycle/Motor Vehicle Accident: Injury ' Ty� Q_ �6�4-78 Du-GD ! �� � � � C�ate = Tir�e Liqht — Weather — Su'rface � MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION I(ETRO OISTRICT - OAKOALE - 7RAFFIC Ell6IMEERIN6 6I6NAL MARRANT ANALYSIS S.P. :1917 . Location ;TH 149 i� KENDOTA HTS. R0. SPEED APPROACH �p�s &ef. Paint s004+40.360 � Oate s02-OB-41 SO Majar App. 1 sTH 149 NB S. �F MENODTA HTS. RD. Z Factor :1.OSB 50 Majar App. 3:TH 149 SB N, Of MENDOTA HiS. RD. Z 45 Minor App. 2 sl�N➢QTA HiS. Rp. E8 M. �F TH !49 p POPUtATI�N LESS THAN 10,000 : NU 3O �I1110f Rpjl. �•tffENDOTA HTS RD. RB E. OF TH l49 2 SEYENTY PERCENT FACTOR l)SED s YES 420/630 t40170 140170 1I2 lMJOR MAJDR TOTAL MARRANT MINOR MINOR iIARRANT NARRANT MET SAME Ft�UR APP.1 APP.3 1+3 MET APP.2 APP.� MET APP.2 KET APP.4 HOURS 6-7 A.M. 31 123 154 ! 22 •22 ! / ! 7-8 A.M. 107 2@2 384 I lOB b3 ! Y / / 8-9 A.M. 42 205 297 / t15 55 ! X / / 9-10 A.lI. 65 96 161 / 44 2@ / / / !0-il A.M. 90 105 145 / 31 14 I I 1 11-12 P.M. 140 116 25b ! Sb 32 ! i 1 / 12-1 P.K. 153 184 337 / � 84 21 ! I / I 1-2 P.M. 123 151 211 / bi �' 24 ! ! ! 2-3 P.M. 133 lb8 301 / 1T0 31 x/ X / / 3-4 P.M. 176 150 32b / 23b 44 �! x 1 ! �1-'S P.K. Z13 152 365 ! ib8 35 Y/ X ! / 5-8 P.M. 183 lb2 345 / 174 34 Y/ Y ! �! 6-7 P.K. 123 113 236 / 50 31 / ! ! 7-8 P.M. 71 65 136 / 37 19 ! ! / 6-9 P.M. 58 b3 121 I 50 7 ! 1 I 9-10 P.M. 60 47 107 / 65 6 / / / l0-11 P.M. 4Z 50 92 ! 13 5 ! 1 / MARRANT 1 IIAS NOT MET : 0 HDi1RS SA?ISFIED REQUIREltENTS 1lARRANT 2 MAS NOT MET s 0 NOURS SATISFIE� REQUIRE!(ENTS NARRANT 6 VOLUME REQIlIREMENTS ifERE tiOT KET IiARRANT 8 MAS NDT MET : 2 H011RS KET / 0 HOl1RS MET YRRRANT 4 8AS NOt MET : O HOURS SAtISFiEO REQOIREMENTS iIARRAKi 11 NAS N01 MET : 0 HOl)RS SATISFIED REQUIREMENTS OATA FtLE --> 149MEND 0 A ' � i � Mn/DOT-ApKDALE nETRO-TRAF�IG EN6. � ite Gnde : 1�400401 PA6E: 6 -S Street: FH I�9 FILE: TEMP-2 -N S►reet: MENDpTA HTS. R0. , � : Direttion: Di� 1 DATE: 21Z0/9t , �__..-------- talysis Resul#s: Star# Ti��e: 4s34 .__------------ End ii�e: 5:29 Totai �Yelay = total Nuffier 5topped [ 5$ ] x 5atpiinq Intetvai t 15 l Aver�ge Delay per 5topped Vehitle = Total Del�y [ 810 ]! Nu�ber of Stopped Vehicles [ 192 ] t = 870 veh-sec. N:3o -S.'3d P��K /�4w�¢, _ �.5 sec. ; Avernge Delay per Appreach Vehicle = Total Oelay [ 870 ]/ Approach Volu�e [ 192 ] = �.5 sec. � � �-Percenf -�f �YeEticles Stopped =<t{usber t►f �topped -Vehicles t i42 •l l-Approach �Voit�ee [ �92 3 = �OQ.OS � /�-� rl /S Iwrw . �f �� S -� S•' /0 = S. / sc c p� K� S/`�'.« • S': oS - S: �tt - 7. 8 S`�r ., 4, e Mn/OOT-OAKDALE „E1R0-TRAfFIC EN6. ;ite Code : 5490000! PA6E: 7 1-S Street: TH 149 FILE: teap-1 :-M Street: MENDDTA HTS. RU. , +eather . Direction: Oir i DATE: 2/20/91 _---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ii�e --Approach Valaoe--- . Beuin Nu�6er Stopped Stopped Thraugh . ----- -------------- ------- ------- 3:�2:00 Pn 1 1 U 3:42:15 d 0 0 3:�2:30 1 2 0 3:42:�5 0 2 0 3:43:00 0 1 0 3:�3:15 0 1 0 3:�3:30 0 • 0 0 3:43s45 0 4 0 3:44:00 0 1 0 3:�4:15 2 3 0 ;:�4030 . U U 0 � ;: 44: �5 . � 1 I g 0 ITALS lOb 311 0 0-- 311 --0 S+S ialysis Results: �Start Ti�e: 2:�b9 •--------------- End Ti�e: 3:�5 9. Total Uelay = Total Nu�ber Stapped i ] x Saapling Interval [ 15 7 � /�io � So Averaqe Delay per Stopped Vehicle = Total Oelay [.1�9fl ]/ Nu�ber of Stopped Vehicles i.3h"l �gt, Average Delay per Approa�h Vehicle = Total Delay [ 1590 ] J Approach Volune [.�1'f ] 340 ��g�o Percent of Vehicles Stopped = Nu�ber of Stapped Vehi�les [� l/ Approa�h Volu�e [.a�f'I l , r Iy�O = �590 veh-sec. 9; yS- 3: vS PEAK li�ia/L S. o - �t sec. � . = 5.� se�. = fUO.OZ /�fiN P�'MK �:VS�i:00 � S. N S�TC 38X�S//o� _ ��y � S�c /4X/S� 3/ = s/`!�N %�FAK i.SS-3:vo - �• s C. WARRANTS rl Advance Engineering Data Required A comprekensive investigation of traf�c conditions and physicai �aracteristics of the location is required to determine the necessity far a �nal instaliation and to furnish necessary data for the praper design and �eration of a signal that is found ta be warranted. Such data desirably �au1d include: 1. The number af vehicles entering the intersectian in each hour fram :ch approach during 26 consecutive haurs af a representative day. The 16 �urs selected should contain the greatest percentage of the 24hour traf�c. 2. Vehiculaz volumes far each traf�c movement from each approach, ���tQ�s� assi�ed by vehicle type (heavy trucks, passenger cars and light trucks, c�$���e iblic-transit vehicles and, in some locatzans, bicycles), during each >-minute period of the two haars in the morning and of the two hours in �e afternoon during which total traffic entering the intersection is �eatest. � 3. Pedestrian volume counts on each crosswalk during the same periods � the vehicular caunts in paragraph (2} above and alsa during hours of �.ghest pedestrian volume. Where young or elderly persons need special >nsideration, the pedestrians may be classi�ed by general observatian id recorded by age groups as follows: (a) under 13 years (b) i3 ta 60 years {c) over 60 years. 4. The 8S•percentile speed of all vehicles on the uncontralled �proaches to the locatian. 5. A conditions diagram showing detaiis of the physicai Iayout, �cluding such features as intersectional geometrics, channelizatian, �ades, sight-distance restrictions, bus stops and routings, parking >nditians, pavement markings, streek lighting, driveways, lacation of �arby railroad crassings, distance to nearest sigrials, u#ility poles and xtures, and� adjacent land use. 6. A cottision diagram showing accident experience by type, lacation, irection af movement, severity, time of day, date, and day of week for at ast one year. ' . The following data are aIso desirable for a more precise understanding f the operation of the intersection and _rnay be obtained during the ___ _ :riads speci�ed in (2} above: 1. Vehicle-seconds delay determined separately for each approacfi. 2. The nurnber and distributian of gaps in vehicuiar traf�c on the "'� S tnajor street when minor-street traffic �nds it possible to use the �" iniersection safely. • 3. The 8S-percentile speed af vehicles on controlled approaches at a point neaz ta the intersection but unaffected by the conUrol. 4. Pedestrian delay time far at least twa 30-minute peak pedestrian delay periods of an average weekday or like pericids of a Saturday or a Sunday. Adequate roadway capacity at a signalized intersection is desirable. Widening af both the major street and the minor street may be warranted �v-�o: to reduce the delays caused by assignment of right-of-way at intersectians �er. s conErolled by traffic signais. Widening of Ehe minar street is often bene�cial to operation on the major street because it reduces the green time that must be assigned to minor street traf�c. In urban areas, the effect of widening can be achieved by eiimination of parking at intersectional approaches. It is always desirable to have at least two lanes for maving traf�c an each a.pproach ta a szgnaiized intersection. Additional width may be necessary on the leaving side of the intersection, as well as the appraach sicie, in arder to clear traffic through the intersection effectively. Before an intersection is widened, the additional green time needed by pedesirians to cross the widened streets should be checked to ensure that it will not exceed the green time saved through '''i improved vehicular flow. . 4G2 Warrants for Traf�c Signal instalia#ion Traffic control signals should nat be installed unless one or mare of the signai warrants in this Mauuai are meE. The satisfaction of a warrant or warrants is nat in itself justification for a signal. Information should be obtained by means of engineering studies and compazed with the require- ments set forth in the warrants. The engineering study shauld indicate the installation of a tr�c signal w�l improve the averall safety attd/or operation of the intersection. If theses requirements are not met, a traffic sig�aal should neither be put into operation nor continued in operation (if already installed}. See Section 4G12, Criterta for Retaining or Removing Existing Signat Cantroi. For the gurpose of wazranting signalization, a wide-median intersection shouTd be cansidered as ane intezsection. When a traffic control signal is indicated as being warranted, it is , presvmed that the signal and a21 retated traffic contral devices and markings are installed according to the standards set forth in this Manual. it is further presumed that signal indications are praperly phased, that roadways are properly designed, that adjacent traf�c signals are properly coordinated, that there is adequate supervision of the operaiion and maintenance of the signal and ail of its related devices, and that the traffic �v-ss � Rav. s signal controller will be selected on the basis of engineering study and judgment. An investigation of the need for traffic signal control should include where applicable, at least an analysis of the factors contained in the following wazrants: Warrant 1—Minimum vehicular volume. Warrant 2—Interruption of continuous traf�c. Warrant 3—Minimum pedestrian volume. Warrant 4—School crossings. Warrant 5—Progressive movement. Warrant 6—Accident experience. Warrant 7—Systems. Wazrant 8—Combination of warrants. Wanant 9—Four Hour Volumes. Warrant 10—Peak Hour Delay. Warrant 11—Peak Hour Volume. Iv-43 (c) iv-2o ��� Rev. 4 The analysis should consider the effects of the right turn vehicles from the minor street approaches. Engineering judgment should be used to 9etermine what, if any, portion of the right turn traffic is subtracted from �v-sa �c� Rev. 5 :he minor street traffic count when evaluating the count against the above �arrants. 3G3 Warrant 1, Minimum Vehicular Volume The Minimum Vehicular Volume warrant is intended for application �here the volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason for :onsideration of signal installation. The wazrant is satis�ied when, for ;ach of any 8 hours of an average day, the traffic volumes given in the able below exist on the major street and on the higher-volume minor- ;treet approach to the intersection. An "average" day is defined as a Neekday representing traf�c volumes normally and repeatedly found at he location. � MIIVIMUM VEHICUUIR VOLUMES FOR WARRANT 1 Number of lanes for moving traftic Vehicles per hour on on each approach Vehicles per hour on higher-wlume minor- major street (totat of street approach Major Street Minor Street both approaches) (one direction only) 70% 70% 1.....».......... 1 .................. S00 350 I50 105 2 or more. 1._ ............... 600 420 ]SO 105 2 or more. 2 or more. 600 420 200 140 1 ................. 2 or more. 500 350 200 140 These major-street and minor-street volumes aze for the same 8 hours. "��'_ During those 8 hours, the direction of higher volume on the minor street • ` may be on one approach during some hours and on the opposite approach during other hours. When the 85-percentile speed of major-street tr�c exceeds 40 mph in either an urban or a rural area, or when the intersection lies within the built-up azea of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, the Minimum Vehicular Volume warrant is 70 percent of the requirements above. 4G4 Warrant 2, Interruption of Continpous Traffic The Interruption of Continuous Traffic wazrant applies to operating conditions where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy� that traffic on a minor intersecting street suffers excessive delay or hazard in entering or crossing the major street. The wazr2nt is satisfied when, for each of any 8 hours of an average day, the traffic volumes given in the table below exist on the major street and on the higher-volume minor- street approach to the intersection, and the signal installation will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow. . MIIVIMUM VEHICUTAR VOLUMES FOR WARRANT 2 Number of lanes for moving traffic Vehicles per hour on on each approach Vehicles per hour on higher-wlume minor- major street (total of street approach Major Street Minor Street both approaches) (one direction only) 1 ................. 1.................. 2 or mora 1 .................. 2 or more. 2 or more. 1..........._.... 2 or more. �o 750 525 900 630 900 630 �so sas �o 75 52 �s s2 100 70 ioo 70 These major-street and minor-street volumes are for the same 8 hours. During those 8 hours, the direction of higher volume on the minor street may be on one approach during some hours.and on the opposite approach during other hours. When the 85-percentile speed of major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph in either an urban or a rural area, or when the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, the Interruption of Continuous Traffic warrant is 70 percent of the requirements above. "� ��'�4G5 Warra�. , Minimum Pedestrian Volume A traf�c signal may be warranted where the pedestrian volume crossing the major street at an intersection or mid-block location during an average day is: 100 or more for each of any four hours; or 190 or more during any one hour The pedestrian volume crossing the major street may be reduced as much as 50 percent of the values given above when the predominant pedestrian crossing speed is below 3.5 feet per second. In addition to a minimum pedestrian volume of that stated above, there shall be less than 60 gaps per hour in the traf�c stream of adequate length for pedestrians to cross during the same period when the pedestrian volume criterion is satis�ed. Where there is a divided street having a median of sufficient width for the pedestrian(s) to wait, the requirement applies separately to each direction of vehicular traf�c. Where coordinated traf�c signals on each side of the study location provide for platooned traf�c which result in fewer than 60 gaps per hour of adequate length for the pedestrians to cross the street, a traf�c signal may not be warranted. This warrant applies only to those locations where the distance to the nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 300 feet and ;where a new traffic signal at the study location would not unduly restrict � platooned flow of traffic. C�rbside parking at non-intersection locations should be prohibited for 100 feet in advance of and 20 feet beyond the crosswalk. � A signal installed under this warrant should be of the traffic-actuated type with push buttons for pedestrians crossing the main street. If such a signal is installed within a signal system, it should be coordinated if the signal system is coordinated. Signals installed according to this warrant shall be equipped with pedestrian indications conforming to requirements set forth in other sections of this Manual. 4G6 Warrant 4, School Crossing A traffic control signal may_ be warranted at an established school crossing when a traffic engineering study of the frequency and adequacy of gaps in the vehicular traffic stream as related to the number and size of groups of school children at the school crossing shows that the number of adequate gaps in the traffic stream during the period when the children are using the crossing is less than the number of minutes in the same period __ (sec. 7A-3). When traffic control signals aze installed entirely under this warrant: 1. Pedestrian indications shall be provided at least for each crosswalk established as a school crossing. iv-so � Rev. 5 2. At an intersection, the signal normally should be traffic-actuated. As �'�� . a minimum, it should be semi-traffic-actuated, but full actuation with detectors on all approaches may be desirable. Intersection installations that can be fitted into progressive signal systems may have pretimed control. 3. At non-intersection crossings, the signal should be pedestrian- actuated, parking and other obstructions to view should be prohibited for at least 100 feet in advance of and 20 feet beyond the crosswalk, and the installation should include suitable standard signs and pavement mazkings. Special police supervision and/or enforcement should be provided for a new non-intersection installation. 4�7 Warrant 5, Progressive Movement Progressive .movement control sometimes necessitates traffic signal installations at intersections where they would not otherwise be wazranted, in order to maintain proper grouping of vehicles and effectively regulate group speed. The Progressive Movement wazrant is satisfied when: 1. On a one-way street or a street which has predominantly unidirectional traffic, the adjacent signals aze so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicle platooning and speed control, or 2. On a two-way street, adjacent signals do not provide the necessary �,? degee of� platooning and speed control and the proposed and adjacent •.% signals could constitute a progressive signal system. The installation of a signal according to this wazrant should be based on the 85-percentile speed unless an engineering study indicates that another speed is more desirable. The installation of a signal according to this wazrant should not be considered where the resultant signal spacing would be less than 1000 feet. 4G8 Warrant 6, Accident Experience The Accident Experience warrant is satisfied when: 1. Adequate trial of less restrictive remedies with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the accident frequency; and 2. Five or more reported accidents, of types susceptible to conection by traf�c signal control, have occurred within a 12-month period, each i�_s; __ _ accident _ involving personal injury or property damage apparently Rev. exceeding the applicable requirements for a reportable accident; and 3. There exists a volume of vehicular and pedestrian traffic not less than 80 percent of the requirements specified either in the Minimum Vehiculaz Volume warrant, the •Interruption of Continuous Traffic wanant, or the Minimum Pedestrian Volume warrant; and 4. The signal installation will not seriously disrupt progressive traf�c flow. Any traffic signal installed solely on the Accident Experience warrant should be semi-traf�c-actuated (with control devices which provide proper coordinatian if installed at an intersection within a coardinated system} and noz�malty shouid be fully traffic-actuated if installed at an isolated interseciion. MINIIviLTlvt VEHIC[JLAR VOLUMES FQR �VVARRANT � Numbcr af tanas for mwing krafHc Vehicles per hour on on each approach Vohictes per haur on higher-votume.minor- major street {iotai of stnet agproach Major Street ` Minor Strect both approaches) (ona direction anly) �..» ............. z�.�...r,....». 400 2 or morc. i..»...»....».,. a� 2 or more. 2 or morc. 420 1.,..».....».». 2 or more. 400 � 120 Ib0 16p Txr�xRurr�aN aF Corrrrrruous Tx�c FOR WARxarrr 6 Numtxr of tancs foz maving traffie Veriicles per hoor pn on each approach Vchicics per hour on higher-volume minor- majar strect {total of strcct appmach Major Str�et Minor Street both approaches) {one direction anly) 1...».»».....» 1 ................» G04 2 or morc. 1 ................» "720 2 ar rnore. 2 or mor�. ?ZO i,..........�.«..» 2 or more. 600 bQ 75 100 lOQ MINIMUM PEDEST'RTAN VOLUME FOR WARRANT C) 4G9 Warrant 7, Systems Ws:rrant . A traffic signal installation at some intersections may be warranted to encourage cancentrataan aad arganization of traf�c flow netwarks. The Systems Warrant �is applicable when the common intersection of two or more major routes: (1) has a total eacisting, or immediately grajected, entering volume of at least 1000 vehicles during the peak hour of a typical weekday and has five year projected traffic volumes, based on an engineering study, which meet�one or more of Warrants 1, 2, 8, 9, and lI during an average weekday; ar {2) �has a iatal e�cisting ar immediateiy projecied entering volume af aL Ieast 100Q vehicles for each of any five hours of a Saturday andlor S.unday. A major route as used in the above wanant has one or more of the following chazacteristics: 1. It is pari of the street ar highway system that serves as the grincipal network for through traffic flow; 2. It includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering or traversing a city; 3. It appears as a majoar route on an of�cial plan such as a major street plan in an urban area traffic and transpartation.study. iv-es tc; Rev. 5 4C-10 Warrant 8, Combination of Warrants . In exceptional cases, signals occasionally may be justa�ed where no single warrant is satisfied but�where Wazrants I and 2 are satis�ed to the ��-6° �`� Rev. 5 extent of $0 percent or more of the stated values: Adequate trial of other remediai measures which cause less delay a.nd inconvenience to traf�c shauld precede installation of signals under this wanrant. MINI�13i7hd ViHICULAIt VOLt7MES FOFL WAitRANT � Number af lanes for maving traffic Vehicles per hour on on each appzoach Vciuctes per hour an highora7o2uma minor- major street (total of street approach (one Majar Str�et Minor Streat bath appi+oachcs) (one direction onip) 1.»»............ 1.».».»......... 60U • 120 80 or mon padestrians for any four hours; or : 2 ar more. 2.....»»....»... ?20 ?5 IS2 or mare pedestrians during any one hour. 2 or more. 2 or more. ?20 iQQ . 1.....»,»....... 2 or raorc. 600 100 ���'�4G1Q.1 Warran� 9—Faar Hour Yolames � The Faur Haur Volume Warrant is satis�ed when each of any four haurs of an average day the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher valurne minor street approach (one direction only) alI fall above the curve in Figure 4-'7 far the existing combination af appraach lanes. When the 85th percentiie speed of the major street traffic exceeds 44 mites per haur or when the intersectian lies within a built-up area of an isolated community having a populatian less than 1p,000, the four hour volteme requirement is satisfied when the plotted points referred ta fall abave the curve in Figure 4-8 for the existing cambination af approach lanes. � 4�10.2 Warrani IQ, Peak Hour Deiay The peak hour delay warrant is intended for applicatian where traffic conditians are such that for one hour af the day minar street traf�c suffers undue delay in entering or crossing the major street. The peak hour delay warrant is satisfied when the conditions given below exist far one hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average weekday. The peak hour delay warrant is met when: ; 1. The total delay experienced by the traf�c on one minor street approach (ane direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals �r exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and.�ve vehicie hou-s for a two-lane approach, and 2. The volume on the same minor street appraach {one direction anly} equals or exceeds 100 vph for one maving lane of traf�c ar 150 vph for twa moving lanes, and . 3. The tatal entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 8W vph for intersections with four (or more) approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. QG10.3 Warrant 11, Peak Honr Voit�me The peak hour vatuzne warrant is alsa intended far application when traf�c canditzons are such that for one haur of the day minor street traf�c suffers undne traf�c delay in entering or crossing the rnajor street. The peak hour valume wazrant is satis�ed when the plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (tatal of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicle per hour of the higher votume minor street approach (ane direction anly) for one hour (any fonr consecutive 15-minute periods) af an average day falls abave the curve in Figare 4-S for the e�cisting combination of approach ianes. IV-43 (c) ReY. 4 1Y-24 {c) Rev. 4 When the 85th. percentile speed of majar street traffic exceeds 4U mph or '"�"" when the intersection Iies within a buitt-up azea af an isotated community '��e,;. � having a population less than 10,000, the peak hour volume requirement is satisfied 'when the platted point referred Eo abova falls below the eurve in Figure 46 for the existing cambinatiou af approach lanes. 4C-11 Factors Governing Selection of Type of Control The principal factors that may lead to the favorable cor�sideration of traf�c-actuated control in the selection of the type af signal control include: 1. Low, fluctuating or unbalanced traffie valurnes. 2. High side street traffic volumes and delays only during the peak haurs. 3. The pedestrian ar accident warrant is the only warrant which is met. 4. The installatian is to provide far one-way movement of two-way traf�c. S. The installation is at a non-intersection lacation. �o orv To THE NEXT PAGE -12 Criieria for Retaining ar Remaving Existing'%`raffic Signai CantroI s with the instalta#ion o# a tra�c cortrot stgnai, a comprehensive estigation and engineering study is required to determine whether to nove ar reiain a traffic contral signai. A traffic control signat should not removed uniess �the signai warrants in this Manual are not met. The ure to satisfy any warrant is not in itself justfication for remaval af a naL � �formation should be obtained by means ofi engineering stutiies and mpared with ihe requirements in "User Guide For Removal Of Not eded Traffic Signais"*. The engineering study should indicate whether � removal or retention of a traffic control signal wili improve the overall `ety and jar operation o# the intersecifort. he following may be used as criteria for retaining and removing traffic ntrot signals: A signalized intersection that meets 80 percent of the volume requlremenis pf Warrant i or• Warrani 2 shoutd be considered a warranted and justified traffic control signai. . A signaiized intersectian that does not meet 80 percent oi ihe valume requirements of Warrant 1 or Warrant 2, but meets 60 percent of the volume requirements of Warcant 1 may be considered for remaval. Engineering studies, findings, judgement and documen- tation will be needed to justify �etaining the traffic contrai signal. A signalized intersection that does nat meet 60 percent of the votctme requirements of warrant 2{and meets na other warrant} should be considered not warranted and shautd be removed from operation. The traffic signat removal decision pracess shall be fotiawed as set farth in the °User Guide far Remaval af Not Needed Traffic Signals"*. The decision to remove a traffia control signai rnust cansider aii study findings and enginesring judgement. GQ ON TQ THE NEXT PAGE i7ser Guido far Removai of Not Neaded Traffic Signals", Implementation Package W�_�p..gp.�z, Novcmber,l9$0, U.S. Departmeet af Transportation Federal Higt►way ministration. � THIS PAGE IS 1NTENTIONA��Y �EFT BLANK _ a > � 600 W Q 500 w � � 400 �� o w 300 z FIGURE 45. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT �� ���������� �,�� •- •- • . •- •- . . �- �- . . . - `- ': ■\���\!� ' ' ■■ _` _' __ �, � � 200 * �I j100 *� _ � � 400 600 . 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800: _ MAJOR STREET — TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VPH *NOTE: 150 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET , APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 100 VPH APPLIES �AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. �...y. . .... ............. ,� . ... i FIGURE 46. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT � (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREEn _ a > I 2 OR MORE LANES £t 2 OR MORE LANES 2 � w Q 2 OR MORE LANES Ft 1 LANE oc � 300 N� 1 LANE �t 1 LANE O w 200 z� �� p 100 * > * _ c� = 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET — TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VPH '�� ; *NOTE: 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. ' ; a soo > i _� wQ W � � 300 �a a oc Q Z w 200 _� � J � 100 _ � FIGURE 47. FOUR HOUR VOLUME WARRANT � * = 340 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 MAJOR STREET — TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VPH *NOTE: 115 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 80 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. c FIGURE 48. FOUR HOUR VOLUME WARRANT (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,OOfl POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREEn 400 _ � > I = 300 �i�, Q �O � °� � Q 200 ow Zg �� p 100 > _ � _ 200 300 400 5Q0 600 700 800 900 1400 MAJOR STREET — TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VPH "NOTE: 80 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 60 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. . � � ..7 PORTaB�E TRaFFiC RECORDER �ATA SHEET � �,. r�on! !�1�^��'a �1c��k�s Ro�� • W �� ��db cauNTY -�G ko}� STaTION N�. :OUNT BEGtNNiNG OAT£ ����'1�Z � OATA BY s�s ; OATE 3I1� 3��� �'��e 3�t� pAY MON . T�UE WEO THUF !2-ta4Ae '� � �? t 1 1-2 t 3 2-3 � � 1 _a � � 0 2 4-� t� S' 3 g_6 2a '2.2 lA• s•T � ��� ��� T-8 535 Sa2 � a_q 29 b 2'18 AVERI,GE •i COUt�T l!N wEExo�,Y wEE«c E �. 3 4. 3 .� ! e • "l � �. � 20. 5 9- 0 93 1 t� � tp �.5 � ! -1! lb0 92 `�6 ' •1 N t�5 i41 � rs3 � fi {2- ! � 204 l 62, !83 - • ! �_2 2'I t26 � 26•5 � - 29 � 262 286.5 1 3-4 35a �1 348 3�2. . � � . zG7 307 z$y 286 5-fi . ZG4 .3Z�i 28a - 2,8�.3 . � 2oa . Id 5 I 4G � 7-$ !b5 • i3b ?�3 � � 1b4.7 � . 8• 9� 4� 67 42 5 2 9•10 47 �� � �'� � 58.� . t1• il 3 1 � 6 � 3 Zo 1 •12t�+t � '� 8 7 'OTAL lz5a 35b"t �zZ1 t852 325y,� ' SKETCH � � %�� wYERAGE OA11.Y TRAFFIC . I l 1' 1 � � �–"' Remorks� = u N � :� � = M t{ Ro Ao . . � � �i � � . � tp�g�cc -x � �iECGRDER TYPE= HR D MR J� AR � D a��r��' g � �; � 11IACH NQ ._., =APE NQ , FtLE N4 �____— �+YoR���' � PtJRTAB�E TRAF�'1� RECORDER E}ATA S#�EET LOCA7tON -��.��'� R�'����'��' �• °����'� COUN7Y R'��A STATION N0. :pUNT 6EGtNN3NG QA7E �Il6 jq2 . OATA 8Y 5P�5 oa?� ��I i� 3�n 31 rs DAY M4N T�UE WEO 12-IAM � 5 t-2 1 2 �_3 p 2 _4 t �:5 2 S '�-� �' ., � � go G9 �.a t�a t� t� , a•y . _ . ��. t� g �p � 124 75 .�� � 9 i tl -12t+i _ ,,._�? ° 12,-I ,_ � �ps � -2 b8 t 5 �_ loy 3•4 t3� tZ�t AVERAGE at COUttT S E!N wEfKD+�Y wEEX f 5 i•� l �.5 ? 4. �" 2. rq � 1 4 t2.3 5-6 l5? .l 8 ..S' t2 6 t �s . �3S.S � 7-6 � 3 � 89 � � 8! 6- 9 5` 5 S'8 � 5�. 5 9- t0 0 �� � � S ! o-tfi Z� z� 2?.S 1-l2M � � o S 'OTA� Z 7 5 f � 4Z S l 1 � l"14 , SKETCH ,ti�{'� 4� � AYERAGE OAfLV TRAffiC q� ;.�,� �, �f Remo�k:= . � �,�, �� . � {��4i � , M� �. � . � i ..� . � . ---. - � �6�� RECORO�R TYPE= HR D MR � AR D� ' btACN NQ ._._.._ TAPE N0. � FILE N0. .� , �� 6 Mendota Heights Road Accident Experience, 1986-iS91 Year Defaware Dodd VislStThomas �exington 55 Pilot Knob Highway 13 TOTALS 1991 1 1 3 0 1 3 2 11 1990 0 0 4 0 0 2 1 7 1989 0 1 1 1 0 2 2 7 1988 1 2 4 0 2 1 1 11 1987 0 0 4 1 2 3 0 6 1986 0 0 2 0 1 4 0 7 Tatal 2 4 1 4 2 6 1 5 6 4 9 , �U �� �� �t��� -��.�,�.� -:� f �:;��-- �;�z�. 3/13l92 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Apri1 1, 1992 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini�l���"' FROM: James E. Dani Public Wor Dir SUBJECT: Curley Trail DI5CUSSION: In 1985 the City constnicted a"backbone" trail. down Lexington Avenue (see attached map). To construct this trail a small portion of easement was needed from Mr. Tom Curley. At that time Mr. Curley agreed to sign a License with the City to allow us to use the land at no charge (see attached). As part of the license Mr. Curley included a clause that would ', allow for him to terminate the license anytime upon 30 days written notice to the City. Mr. Curley has now submitted that written notice (see attached) . ; - The only location a replacement trail could be installed for this segment would be along Le�ngton Avenue to Tom Thumb Blvd. This trail, if constructed immediately, is estimated to cost $14,000. The ideal time to construct a replacement trail would be in conjunction with the upgrading of the Lexington Avenue/Trunk Highway 110 intersection. Mn/DOT would do this construction within their Mendota Interchange project and the costs would be shared with Dakota County. Mendota. Heights' share would then be funded by MSA. This MnJDOT construction would be Phase II work would and be completed sometime in 1993/94 time frame. � I called Tim Curley to see if he would be willing to delay removing the City's trail from his property until we could construct a replacement one with the Mn/DOT work. He said no, but that he would be willing to negotiate with the City if we would consider granting some variances. He desires to have the City allow development of all his residential lots , along Mary Adele Avenue in exchange for allowing the trail extension to remain. Five of the nine single family lots that he owns along Mary Adele do not meet the City's 70 % rule for area (10,200 vs 10,500 SF� and will need to be either combined and enlazged or granted � variances before they are developed. Note: Existing platted single family lots are allowed to be developed without a variance if they meet 70 � of todays ordinance requirements. OPTIONS• 1. Do nothing, leave the trail in place in violation of the license agreement and remove it after the Mn/DOT construction (This option could expose the City to legal liability). ' 2. Remove the trail now and construct a replacement trail. along Lexi.ngton with park funds or lea.ve no trail connection until after the Mn/DOT construction (people will no doubt continue to walk through the Curley lots). 3. Agree to favorably consider Mr. Curley's variances for his substandard lots along Mary Adele (he would still need to make application and go through the process). 4. Condemn an easement in order to allow the existing trail to remain (this could be a fairly costly option). � ACTION REQUIRED: Review the problem and select a course of action. � rr"� y a LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 1985, by and between THOMAS 0. CURLEY AND MARY A. CURLEY, a husband and wi.fe, parties of the first part, and the CITY OF MENUOTA HEIGHTS, a municipal corporation (here- inafter called the "City") ', W I T N E S S E T H: That the party of the first part, in consideration of ONE DOLLAR AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION to it in hand paid by the City, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant,:'quitclaim and convey unto the City, its successors and assigns, the following: ; A license to use the following described property for the purpose of maintaining a portion of the City's trail'system which license may be terminated by the owner at any time upon thirty (30) days written notice: ' The southwesterly five (5) feet of Lot 8, Block 1, and the northeasterly five (5) feet of Lot 9, Black 1, Curley's Valley View, Section 16, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota. E IN WITNESS WI�REOF, the said parties of the first part have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date and year first above written: By THOMAS 0. CURLEY i I By ' MARY A. CURLEY STATE OF MINNFSOTA) ) s.s. COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 1985, before me personally ap- peared THOMAS.O. CURLEY and MARY A. CURLEY a husband and wife described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they exe- cuted same as their free act and deed. � Notary Public My Commission Expires / / This instrument was drafted by: City of Mendota Heights Engineering Department 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 1 i� ��=�...'�" ��� �� �.�1 y',/,.�• �..� ~ ;Zl�!� / � / ���___`����2i}� 't"+r ♦ �-�'�s�•, j,,.''� a.-r.+.,,.Yy:' '"7� �„�,,3,n?.,�'-r��„��,�...��� - /�„�,"�r� �--�,�, l �w�v �/ �,-�� �-*~.�-*s� arr'��-v�� '' ��C�y� ;,�'"'' � ---�` r���l� �,�������� � --�,� ���_-�����, �,��, � T� . �,:, � ,c�.;��',�.'�/�L�,� a��,J,,,. �'�'?j���/�'����'��`��� ..� ;?��--►--na.. _ � �r /� i %'��yJy��,. '�t"� G"�^r I� �`�yG2�1�/�' ��''^��'r� ��'�"�� /� �hG / � �rYyy .�^"� 3 ''. �� , �� � .. �t�������� �p �� ���. � . . � d' �—y ,,�► �°'3� � 'v�� .��--,---4,r,,-.�,y.�,, �,�.�/ �, ., r - / o i /� ,�"�, �Q �� � _ ��� � .�iC� � v` "'���� r� �,�.y�,y rs/1�r�J''�''����'? �/,% rr' �9�'�"S _.�.�.� . - � ' l -.• " ��/� - . ::���-,�.-� ��'�,,.r� � ,� f �jy��-r-�,/ :�: . - • - -� �„� _„�-.�,;y,�„ i�r�-� .c-y��-yt�'' i�"� " ` � ,� v /�Z �Y"'� %� •i' °'ti`'C� G� ,Q- j�r /�,��n�,�i"" ^�y.l�� � �� `%? �,:. � "` ..������? YY .�� r � . .. :I• _J'� • • • � . �-�'�r�',r�',��; i�'?-�✓i �� �:_ . , pr r� � %�'�G/ /' �� �� ��' � ��'��y',� . r-�"'.`.•,-+.,,'y'�„�, y�+� , . i,P/ j . �. -��,"S;�,a"� .�-v"�" / • ���c� /i��•r',� . ��� . r.� �� r �' r� °�' `��''��' f1 'I"�' �� ��.-'�,yUy� -,�-,'''t"�2'�'�../1 / �%1` ����j : �� �-� � � �� �r� ��' n�'-�' � �` � � -t �� � S� z if ��' � ��`� � . J-� ������ °) � S � 1 2, � c i_ �Y� l��u� r��- �' � - � . �,.� "' ,_ � �� ✓ , , ����� r �. � � � r1' ''�'� .�� �"�" ' ..� , . � - . . �.�-����-�' � ��i�'� �r ; •= . .�—��. ." s�-----�--��-- � J�,-3-�rr �..a-�•,�' j^,..� . -y-,.,/'� ��c.���� _ y ��� Q r � � . �;�'_����- . � } . .��- . - � . ' .�- � �r-�� ��~�� � -.�-�-,�- ��� .; . , -. . ..� ��� �-� _� ,�,' �,�-�-.�- �-�' � ���� d X'-�� � ����tir� i � 'Yfyj� /����y��� Y7��a';t�2� / .� i � � � ��j �;�� :." �"�'',�` � � � '�.1"..� �,,,,.%�%� ".�1tti'.�'_"y�.,�r��' ri' , �+ r � f e' � _ - 9 ` � � � � � �� ,��� �-`.?i%�j�..jr�/' �'�%'7G"'��'"�,yiz' ��""' �y� � �Ci � �i �"n�xL���. :�� -'�.'3�..'"1'y,'�,'��--Y%�% ��''�"� � �/% ������ �� ��� - �'.�-�-,'� �� z.�,�,, j �-y�-�,.�,,r �"-��^..���,.,,� p� �%'�-a�-a� � ' `� �`'� ;i� '�",�p��r.� � ��2-�,,?�-r-� �—.,�� �y�'� � � �_ � i , ,�''r�—e�►--T,—,�, �� l� ��'""�`a-r�*-�rrf!'�--" i ; . ���� ' �� '� � �'-�"'?� "+�j,•-�' , l ,�_ ��- ,�/ �':��y" . f :� � ��: - :°���� . -�. _.. / /����,� � / i G� ��?r%�— -y, ,_ j� . .. : .. .:ti.,. . �: . ' . � _... , , + r� ; ��. ZAIL EXISTING TRAIL ON - CONSTRUCT TRAIL TRAIL CITY STREETS ' ALONGSIDE LEXINC MEND�TA HEIGHTS gAC KBONE TRA I L SYST EM MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD - MARIE AVE. JOB 8410 C.EXINGTON_ AVE. �y . i � A�TERNATE ROUTE f . , . � � �f , , , . , . , . , �. - , -..._�-..-._-_-._ �_-..__-_.__._-..-_-__'^_ � _ ;--"--�aen -�-'�'-`--"-'-_ i i i , � � I � = t3 12 It .{Q 9 I � • � ! 1 � t -� � � .. •••� �- -'--'________ � � � PATRiCIA ST_ � - -- --- ----- --- , �� � ! ( • � 4 t 1 17 i8 19 20 21 22 I I BIk. 4 � i t i � � URGEYS !/QLL Y !/JE i i • � i 5 4 3 2 1 � � � � � . ,�� :> i ---------'a� THERESA ST. � �------ -.�J� W� Di � . , 2a 2s ��- i � . �t , Q i . I . . t� i i `� .' � �, ; � � � � � ! � � a,�� s� ' • �� ��! I� e� �1 ��r r r f '�A CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MII�ZO ' Mazch 31, 1992 TO: Mayor, Ciry Council and City A FROM: James E. Danielson, Director of Public SUBJECT: Water Supply DISCUS5ION: Last year City Council received a report from HNTB concluding that the water supply to Mendota. Heights was inadequate during times of high lawn sprinkling. Their suggested solution to this problem was to run a new high capacity supply line from the 6 MG reservoir located in West St. Paul to Mendota Heights' 2 MG elevated tower. This solution was for the ultimate buildout condition of the City and could be completed incrementally as require- ments dictate. After the HNTB report was received by Council, City staff inet several times with St. Paul Water Utility staff to discuss the situatiori. St. Paul Water Utility agreed with HNTB's findings that a large new supply li.ne is needed. We also met with West St. Paul staff to discuss construction of the needed supply line through their City. West St. Paul staff indicated to us that they would tie any Mendota Heights water improvements through their City to solving a low pressure problem they have in a neighborhood through which Mendota Heights' trunk supply line runs. I feel that it should be St. Paul Water Utility's responsibility to install adequate water supply lines to serve the City to our border. I sent them a letter requesting that they install the needed lines (see attached). Their response to my letter was that the first step to considering our request would be the negotiation a new agreement (see attached letter). I have also attached a copy of the old St. Paul Water Utility Agreement which expired in 1982. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that Council authorize staff to begin the negotiations for a new water supply agreement with St. Paul Water Utility. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the recommendation, they should review and discuss the attached St. Paul Water Utility contract, gi�e staff guidance on any desired changes to the contract and authorize staff to begin negotiations for a new contract. ` � i�y o� � 1I��1 � ��endo�a Hei�ghts �y March 3, 1992 � -...� .t.�..'�- �� � Mr. Thomas'Mogren, General Manager St. Paul Water Uti.liry C'rty Flall Armex 25 'West Fourth Street St. Paul, MN SSIt}2 Dear 1V1r, Magren: In 1991 the City of Mendota Iieights hiced the engineering fum of Howard Needles, Tammen and Bergendoff (FINTB) to study the City's water system. X have previously supplied you a copy of their report. Civer the Iast several years Mendota Heights has had difficulties�in maintaining adequate water levels in our 21VIG tawer. In the HNTB report, they addressed the pmblem by recommending that a i,arge diameter (24") "backbone" watermain be connected from the 6 MG reservoir in West St. Paul through Mendota Heights to the 2 MG tower. In meetix►g with you and your staff it was agreed that the �CNTB conclnsion that a Iar,ge diameter line needs ta be insfialled is correct. Mez�dota Heights does not have tlie ability to consttuct watermain within the City of West St. Pau1. 4 � Under the terms af the contract for Water Service between the Board of 'Water Cornmissionears of St. Pau1 and the City af Mendota Heights, the Board agrees to furnish at no charge the water requirements of Mendata Heights at the points of connection by Mendota Heights. Mendota Heights reqaests thai the Baard of Water Commissioners constn�ct the needed "backbane" watexmain through the City of West St. Paul to the Mendota. Heights barder at no ch�arge to Mendota Heights. Please inform me as soon as passzble as to the Board's inten�ions on this most important and urgent neeci witlun our City. Tha.nk yau. Sincerely, _ . � - �--,_. 7 es E. Danielsan, P.E. blic Works D'uectar cc: Steve Gleason 11U1 Victoria Curve =1V�endvta Heights, �'V�N • 55118 452• 1850 � •�^• - � : .�.N �_ ,.-- CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MIN �ESOTA'": � BOARQ OF WATER_COMMISSIO.I t. :, f . _ �- � March 11, 1992 Mr. James E. Danielson Public Works Director 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Danielson: .� Your letter to me of March 3, 1992, requested the Board of Water Commissioners construct a water main from its water supply system in West Saint Paul to the Mendota Heights city limits in order to meet the water supply needs of Mendota Heights. As you know, the agreement between the Board and the City of Mendota Heights has expired. The matter of a new contract must be addressed before consideration of a request for an additional supply main will be given. Water Utility staff is prepared to meet and discuss this matter with you, at your request. Very truly ours, i��%Z�� C ��_-.. Thomas D. ogr General Manag TDM/cao cc: Verne E. Jacobsen Steve Gleason / t� � � �Q � }°�a sEaJ� 4TH FLOOR CITY HALL ANNEX - ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 • . :ti :.�:.�:�>;::. n 9 ( CCA:lP2ROLLER' S FILE; Af�tT. PIO. Z238 ) �i�7�� ��l �� s�,�� b@ �W'28II LiIE B{3�ARD t1E' T�tATBR C�lMIS3IO2�S i�! SAINP FAIJL, �30TA ' and the . • VILIAGS OF MSI�OTA $821�T3� MINNSSt)TA .. ♦ Y. 2'tcig conckxact u�de and entered intc thie _�.:,� day af `�J�.�� 2952, and bet�eea the Bau�.rd o� F7ater Gommiseionars of'the City oE 3afnt Pault� a� eipal utility lacated in Ram�eq County� Minneaota, hereinafter cailed the ."Bpard" ar "Water Departmeat" and the Village oP 2�2sendota Baighta� a minici.pel " cozporatiait.Iccatad ia Dakots Cavnty, Minnasu�a,'ltereinaEter ca2�e� "MBt1:dCta �beigh�tl"� . . �.��rSJC�: i Tl�at Che a�i8 pertiea, in eonsidexatfon o� the uutual cav�enanta an8 agre,�me�ate hereimaPter aet Porth, have agreed to and wi.th each ather ae follows: . ' • • _. .. ... � .:� 1. �SHM OF ('OI�'xRACT . :,.;�- : . .. . . . ,,• Tfifg ca�ract atiali be �ar a texau cE twentY Y'�,s�a-�ram the date . . �"'"'�-. •ai�bxiseution i►ereat, uriZese Lerminated esr2fer ae t�sreinaiter pravided. �Sfe coritraet smq be aenceZed bq either party far cauae conatitutin� bzeach o£ thi.a ecntrac� o� bq th� Baserd it Iays•ere eziacted bq the State o� Mitsnesota or the tlni.tad 8tatea of�limeri�a whfeh aubatantialip and�adversely aifect rights, duties � •✓ or abiiga�i6ttn ai the 8oard'under thia eontract� or it may be termfnated at the ead 'of ti,tteett �yraare c� the term by written notice af auch intent ta torminate given �y st�t2Lsr af" tha psrtiea ta t'he ather at anp tims durf� the Pourteaatie qes's oE��iaid term. , z. wnrs� s�vzas A. Th,e Soaard agreea to furnts�h the water raquirements of t3endctta Hsighte at�d ite reaidents fcr damestte, coz�rcial, and fire protectfan'• � . . 1� s�n ry�� . Pleese r�tum to �.��.� �A7ER �F.j�ARTkENT. CI'(1' O63T. PA{!l' BRIEfEt1 �—�� tJ 4.. 'j' f��,.�'� ` � • . . . _.,....—.-.. � �. . -_ ,...._--�.�v� ,._::_ : �r•."'f'�",``^�-�."'t.._�,.,,,�.�..:_---!�"-4. ^Y . ' . . • . • .�"' , � „ .�,. ... , .. • . , . . , .. • . ,. �?t ;�j+� :fr' , � . � : .... , ._ �,. - � •-y. .. . . , . ' . , ' ' � � .,. � , ' :a" �.. • ' . " , •��i' .. . . . . . , , .. t..' ' `" ��:i� " � i � 'v; a T� . T :::��: �. � s ' py�rpoaes under narm�al etatic preaenre in £ts mains et the pointe oP connection b�► Mendata Hetghta. It ia underatood and egreedr howevgr� that the Board unde�ta3�ea tc suppip sueh water �niy in ease the preasure in its u�ai�a ie au�Picient to ene�ble it eo to do� and tha Board aasumee no raeponeibi,lity Par failure to•eupply watar reaulting LrQm a�ts ar catfditioIIe beycnd ii� eontrol, B. The qua2ity aE water �`urniehed to Mendota iisigiats ahall be the eama treated water aupplied by the Board to its ather coneumera. C. No supplemental supply of water aha12 be eazureate8 ta the Mendota HeigBta taater eyatem being aerved bq the 8oa�cd withaut Che approval of tlte Bosz'd. 8RlEFEC j ° _ D. Meudata �e£ghta further a�,rees Chat the use and distributiqn oP water ia Mendota Hsighta, derived'�rom the eupply furniahed from tt�e cmins of the Board, shal! at a31 times be gavexnsd bp the rules, re�u2etf.ene sttd eenditfons whi.ch the Baasd has heretafore adopted in the City oP Saint Pau7., ar rahich it maq i�erea�ter adopt in said city fram tfine ta time fas the presarvation, regulatiau atu3 prctecticn of fta water suFPIYs and Mendata Heighia agrees ta act�pt the rvles, regulatione and requirer�enta o�' the Board now in farce ar that map hereaPter be adopted; in conneetiun wfth the use aP w�ter by it in �Sendota Refghts, and to. eaact sueh rules� regu2ations and requiremente fnto ordinancee ar otherwiae make them legally efPentive and binding, withi.a sixty days aFter the exeaution o£ this CdIILrQCt� snd to enact anp ameadusenta therat�a aclogted by the I3osrd� w£thfn thizty daqs sEter being notiEied af aueh adoption and tn adapt suitable penaltiea Por the vielation oE any thereoE, and to strictly ez�orce such rules, ragulatiana and requf,remeats inacfar as ttzep app2y and are not in conPlict with the provisions oE this egree�nt, B.' It is �urthsr agreed that the Bcard, through its affieers, ag�nts and emgioqeea, aha1l have the same authority and juriadiction in the enEorcement oi' sunh rules and 'ren,ulatiens in Mendota Ha�.ghts that tizey havs fn the Gitp of Saiat Paul, and �endota H�ights agreea that when complsint ie made ie it by anp aE the oPfic¢ra� agenta or emploqeea af the Baard o� a violatien of tha ator�sa�d rules� it wi12 take tmmediate and eEfective ateps to prevent the _2_ Please remm to WATER DEPARiM£h7, CITY 06 ST. PAUI . . . � ' a . . . . . . r. . • • . ' � ' �. . .. � �• : •'�•' � <:r:= ...u:,./r. ......_..,,,,.w..'..,,,,e.n..._ ...^..mn�.c . x::•:';' � stion o$ auch rulea, zegulations and raquiremanta, and puniah the eraof, and that it will melca it the duty at ita aLtarasp tc proaecute ns of ev�h rules� regulaticne a�1 crdinancee upon co�latnt being vialation thsreaf bq tiea Baard or bq any ot ita officera� a�ettta or • 3. WA��R 3Y5R"7�3 FAGIIZTZBB • .A. Mandota Hsighta a�reea to canatruct ar have installed at fte own expenne adequate atui suitable �+ater maina an8 appurtenancee adequate far the diefixibufiian o�' aaid watar within tha corporate lfmits aE Z3etidata ti�igiita in accordance witn epecificatians and atendarda acceptab2e to Lhe Weier Department. Plana of al.l e�ctenaione to the Mendota 8efght� ayatem connactitxg to �,he Baard•s Water supp2y sha23 be submitted Por approvsl by the Baard bei'ore advertieiag for bfda, the awarding,oE eentractst or actual eonetructian ts begun. B. �he.t said maine, appurtenances, aarviaee and connectian5 sha13 be ai' the esue 2cind o� materiais snd conatruated in the manner and under the aame atark3arda, ru2es and regulstfons as are now in ef€eat ar as may here�nafter be preeCribsd by the Board for eimil�r fnatallatl,ona or inatrnmentaZittea in the Qfty oi' 3a�i.nt Paui or under standarde aeceptable to th,e Board. - C. Mendata Hefght'a shsli, bp tice enaetmant flf auitable ru2ea, ragulatioae,or.ordinancea, require.Lhat all piping, �ixtures, �ccea�arfsa, ititerior or on tlxe premiaea in anp mann�r connected to the publi.c wat�ar eyatem aupplied by the Baard� stia].I ba ot tira mama materfala and fnsta22e8 in tha same matmer anci meeL the same atandards As are required �'or the aama•cr aimi2ar worE: in the City of S�int k'aul. � ' D. It ie agreed�that aII aervice entusectione frem the mait► to tt;a progerty liAe sha11 be itiata22ed bp tri.a Baard under rules tdentfca2 wfth those in e�'Peet in the City o� Saint Paul ar as maq herea�xer be modif ied bp the Board. The ehargea for such eerv�.ce con�aecti,ans ehail be ia accnrdance with the achtdu2e aP c�argea �sLabliahed �rom tia� to tfine hq t2�a Board fos euatamsre outai,de. thA citq Ximita of Saint P�ul� pxovidecl, 8avravar, that Lhe Board eha12 —3— Ptease r�tarn to �� ' WSTE1t OEP,ARTMENT. CI7Y OE ST. PAUY,, ♦ .. . . ..t>�- .' .; ... .. , . . . .. • . . .. � . . � � . � ; `' ' . . r ' ,; •' tscL char��e Mendcta Heighta cuatomere e►ore Lhan 110% oP ths chargea made to� ' tt�oae�in 8eint Paul, ar mare than the lowet� charge made to aoy Quatomer cuteide . 4 • - " S �' 3aint Paul !or lilaa aervica. Hew epplications ior wnter eervice connectione anali b� maBQ to and.through the Bcard, aad each appl'icant'ehall iuraieh tha Baerfl•a c0rti�ied atrnet addreai eatabli�hnd by �4endota SeighLa. • 8. It ia agreed thet N�ndots Heights ahall make na exteasions to ita distribution ayetem beyoud tha coxpoxation limito c! Mendota Beiglits withwt the iarittan appreval ot tha Doard. F. t3�ndota 8eighta agreee to permit the Bcard Lo �loa cocu�actions to 8x� Mvo jeint uae c+E eo m,tch af filx3 wata� ayatem owaed bq Asatidota Iiaighte requ�d �'A� extetu�one beqond the corporate limite oP Mendota Hni�.t■ if deemcsd teadible attd daaf�ub2e by the Board and not detrimanfiai•4a the eupply�within Mandata XeighCa; tfae Board wili paq Mendota 8eights far anq ench use� �s amaunt oi' auch paqmant ta be �gctiated bq ihe partie.a hereto. � ti. The Hoard, through ite ofiicera, agents and emp2oyee9 shall bave the ri�tt! at all timaa to examine, inspect and test any c:a�teriake or workmanehip uaed or to be uecsd in conneetion with the waterwarke ayetem oi � Mendpta. 8eighte nnd eupplied c�ri.th c��nter Dy fihe Board or anq thereoP or connections tl�rato, For L'Ae purpoae cf determining wheth�r br not they comp2y with the • Pt�egbit►g provi�ions, atid ehall have the right to exam£ne and SnapecL tl�2 c�aLerials and workmanahip anl ma�hods a� insLallaiian oP hovse plumbin� con�eting crith aatd �saYas�aorka aqstem for ths erune puzpose. Aiendota �eighte �hall pay the Hoard the aatual caat o! ani4 iaspection'on new wa�er maim end•appustenance in�tallatioae �shenever itutal2¢d by oihera than ttea Board. • H. 8xcept ao�Lereinnft¢r pruvided� the Board agrese te maintain and maIa3 all �cese�ry repairs te the watarworks aqatem nP MenQota Eafghta, aupplted with Hater bp th�a Board� to kecp the aame in praper repair and candition to grav�ent aay waeta oP water, and Mandota Heig�te further agrees.that tha Dqard mey u�ks emergeneq rapaire to tha waterworka aqatem of Mendote i3Ei�cte� and the eoet oi' sncts matnteaancQ aiiall be the aole Qxpenea of the Daard. 'Ths reatoration •o! aemi-�rmanant or pesmanant atreat type aurfacea CP t�endqta l�ighta damaged ' Pleaeo nhrm t6 WA7fFj DEPqRiIkENi, C(1y pF3T, pp� -4- -'�' � �. . . .. � ;. ., . _ . .: t�_`::... ,, e�.ciey}�py,ed i.n connGctien trlth maintenence, iepair� conatruetion ar reconetzuetion • ' '�; ,• .. t.': i"L.' �FH"'�• •• :��z<;z�k:•t� be cIcne Up the Boara pursuant to the provi.aians nf tii.ia a�reemea� sha22 i'�`" ;; �:. . ' . '� ��`��be..<lene by Mendata Heighte, at ita so7.a ezpenae, and any and s1I expeneea or coats '�; �' � reenTting to ttaa wate� supply eqstem in Msndate A,�ights in conaection u*tth the maintenatxce or Xapaiss af public atrests, al2eya ar rf�ta-of-�asq dus to ehange ' af gradQ cn auah atrests, alieya* rightaroE-way or anp other change resulti.ng fram actian of Mandota Heights as auch changes aL'Pect m�ina, aerviceg and aPpurtettances withia Mendata Eeights, shall be borzee by Mendota I%ighte:` Atendat.� Haights 6sreby agrees that it wil! proceed with reaaanabla promptnesa tc restore ' aemi-parmanent or permaneat atraet type avrEacea a�C Meiniota Heighte damaged or deetraped in cannectinn �ri�h maintenance� repair� construction or reconatruction � taork dan� bp the Soard atter notificatiea bp the Board through ite aPficers or . emploqeee that the Board has concluded ita wark on aay �iven project in a atreet , requiring reataration oE aera£-permanent or permanent atreet type eurPaces, I� �� further agreed by and betwaen #he partiea to thi.s agreemant that where Mendota Eeighta constructe ar contracta �or the constructian o� t�eW maiba, aervicee and appurtenanc�e to be counected to the eqsxem and supplied with wa��r by l;2te Bcsrd pursuant to the Lerms, ccnditfeus aud previsicna aP this � agreement, that the Bpard chall nat be reepona�ibia for the mai.nteaance or repafra to auch t�awlp cat�tructed aclditicne to the w�ter aupp2q eyatem until one yaer frcm #hs 8ata the aame hae beea plaeed in operat£aa or until the Board bas notffied �' . Mandata 8sfghts ia writtng oP the aeceptance bp it of suc2s iasLaliatfea, whichever • date ia eerlier. ... Z. Mendota 8aighta daea hereby �rant the Boaxd the right in the pez�ozvianee cf thta agree�nt to the vse o� the atreets, a2leps ar pub3fe waye of l�endota, Heighta far purpaeea of the 13oard� iricluding excavation i'or pez�'oriainF; necesearq work incidental to the perPormance oP this contract and said Mendota He£ghte 8aes hsreby a�ree tkrough ita departraental ageacies to eoaperata ta the fuilest e�ant 3.n the protectian a� anq maine, appurtenancea and excavatione or barricades that may be neceesary oP the work pertozwed bq the Haard, �� Pieasa nlum to WATEB OFPAR7N£Ni, C17Y Qi ST PAtlE ;, �. . . . � .. ` S. _ ' ' .' , . . � , . ' . . . • .., . . •.'�.4' ''�.� FS:_ .s ' ' ': .�.: • .'• �; »'is�` r: t: ' % . . ..�„' _, . . . � ... 4. MSTBR3 ME'Pffit Rl3ADIN0 At�f BILLSNG . r.: •; . A: �'hs Board stas3l �ttrnieh, insts7.1 aud retsin Litle Lo eil i �, c�retonnmre� tti�teFa aith �u31 responaibLlity tc maintenance aP eam+a in accozdance �.. . ; . . . . . . wl,f�h. r�i�as aad regu2atiana' ia efPect in 8aint Paul M provid�d Lhat • shautd Meudota gsfghte aoavgrt � the purchase cf trater at wholaeale fram the Board� as provided �' !or`in�3ection 20 h.erein, sll meters shaTl be purahaaed by tha Village of Mendota Heighte trcm the Board and tha prfce theraoE et�►22 be determined an the basia ot tha remaining life of safd meters am,ortized oa the basie that the iife oP a ubeter ia Lhirty C30i '3'�ara. , . B. �he•Baard ffihai2 aseume fu22 reapenaibiiity and expenae for zeading a� iaetere� biili.ng and co2leetion of acaauute. 5. t�1�II2 RA2'BS � ei�.xgea. and rates to Mendota Esiglt�e shel.l he ea fo22cs�a: •3/4" cr sma2ler meter, 1�' meter, � 1�'t:m3t8r� � �;�'•' ' ma.tes, � - " 2" metezt ' � ��"�meter, 4" maCer� 6" meter, . ' BTM meter, 10" imeter, " Dem�nd ar Ffxed Gt�rgee - $ 6.00 per ann;uai, T�Y�bI+a quarter2 y .' 7.20 per anaum, P$Y+�ble querterlq , 28.20 per anaum, P$3'�ls monthlp 13.20 per aattara,, payabie �onthlp 27.00 jser Atilitim, . payabla manthl.y' • G6.00 pe� gn3�um� • gayai�le mantt�y 120.p0 per annum, paqable mon�hly 240.Oa per anzu�m� papabl� montltlg . 420.00 per anrnim, . payeble tnanthly • . 64Q.OQ per enttttmt PgY�ble manthZq Gonsumption Rate . First 50�006 cu. ft. of water per mattth et 30¢ per 100 cu. Pt. Neut 450,4UQ eu. ft. c£ watez per cacanth at 15¢ per 1�0 cu. it. A11 �iVex 500,000 au. E�. a� water per month aL 7.(f� per 100 cu. P�. : c: or aa ma�t,be moditied„ ehatsged ar re-estab2ial� bq ttse Iioaxd af Water Cq�iseiox�are oE the Qitiy ot satnt Paul and ttas Council of the CiCy of Saint Paul Ptaese rEtutn t4 WATER. D�AARTA�EryL CITY R� S.% PAIJ{;, -6- _ �. a. -, � . . .-:�,: N.. ``� r;� j i� ;. ,:;:"" nt to a lica.ble oratnaacea c� $aia cst euDjeet however aurs tti.e fr purnua. , FP , S'. � . � 1 t•, .�ri,ad,of• this a��pament to the fol2ow3.}�p" li.mitatiQne and conditians: .5 (���+• � '�C, ! .•�� . '.�. �: . 1 , rieman�"or PiYoad Charstea ty,. e.' . • , . . r. • : ', •'.�. .3i�" iar $ma2ier mstera - tbs charge -shall nat exeeed $3 par annum av�er q .auch"�charge td Saint Paul ecneumera. . �; ,.1" maters - the charge si:all not e�rceed $3.b0 ger atim�m over such charge to Safnt Paul conawcera. M�terg la�ge� than ene inch - the charge eheli nat euceed 10 pereent ' per ann�m ovar anr� above the char�es to consumera within Sal.nt Paul. 1't�e� rate charged Lor the firat atep ar firat 50,OOQ cubic feet per month ahall not exceed nine cents {9�) per 100 cu. Pt. ever and abeve the rata eharged �to conaumers in Saint Pau3.. . xha rate chargad far the second step or next k5D,op0 cubfe feet per moath � ehnll aot e�oceed aeventy-five pereent t75%) oE�the rate charged for the first etep, . �: ' x'he`�rate chargeci tar the third atep or all over 5o0,OQ0 nubic feet per month sh�ll nat exceed fi�ty pereent {50°6} of the rate eharged far the firet ntep: ' .�,'- .For eimplicity in acaounti�, the chargea end rstee shai�, t�e fio the clasest c�ctl� cent. Za no case ehaii the ehargea or ratee ta Mendota Heighfia eac+eesd the ahsargee or• rates to ather 8oa�d aonaumers outaide bf corporate 2imit� � oP 3aittt�Pau1 Sar like sezvice. � .. 6. PROTSC'1'IO�i SB�YIGS AND IiYDBA2� If3I3 • A. 8ize Protection Service aball conaiet af'a Eire hpdrant maintenane'e eoat ef $5 per hpdrant and a standby f ire proteetfon charge oF $2U per � hpdrattt, whfch, tatal charge et�all be paid annua22y ar semi-anmtaliq and sha21 be based on the rnumber af hqdranta at $15 per hydrant. . 'ilie hytilrent mainteaance eharge and the etendbp charge sizai2 eeCh be� eubjeet ta a3justm�ent auhject to mutuai agzeement, conditioz�ed, howevar, that the msintenat�ce charge et�a11 bfa no mare then is charged the Gf.ty af Ptease rrtum to Yl1L7ER DFPARialfl�IT, CITY D�ST. Ph!!L. ' . . . � _s ' ,.:r• •'c • ` . � • s .. • . ..t.:'. . •' .. - -7- . .. _ .. . . . . . , . • •'r:._ . .. .. ' 0 � � -1�::�'z•: r. r: <;: t Sa3nt Pau7, and.provided turther that the total aharge aball b8 ao mqre thaa tt�� csinicum e2�arge ta a�y entzaide. area Seing �uznixhed watgr oz► a retail. baai� and•itrtv � disCritrutian syataaz a�d by euch erea. S. QC r Authorized Uaee • 'Meadota Heighta "hereby agraaa ta k��p atrfat end correct accaunt ot alI water uaed for atrae� �prittkliag, atreeL E2u�hing� aewer � asaintenanas cr re2�ted uee, and tq pap aemi-annuallp thazstare to tt� Board ai the ltrr�aax step rate in ei`Pect for Mendcts Haights. ' 7'. RI�T OF GIAY • Mendota Heights a�rees to grant ta tha Bcard tk�e Erea ead un�uterruptad�use rst ali pablic Liiorcughgarea, e2lnys �nd'ut�ifty eeaeaenta aa may ba,r8aeotrably necese+�zy tor uee oP tha Bcard in conetructian �nd maintenaace o;� aat�r �aitsa xn�3 fncilitiea within the corpar�►te Zimite oi Niando�a Hel.ghta, 8. IRC}St�IFIGATI0i2 Mendota.Hei�ts daes teeraby eovextant and agre¢ te iudemniPy and aa� �ha Baard aP t+�t4r Commi�sioriera oP the Citp of Saint Patil, tha Cf,tp cP 3�£nt Pa�el, anci a21 oP �itefr aifiesrs* agc�nt�, em�lsyeea and sarm�tta, heraalesa gram e�d agai,nat a�eq and nll euita, actione� d�m�nde, claimn ot every kind or charac�er, ariaing out ot rn on eccount aE Enrni.shing cf cr i'ailure to �ur�niah saster bq the �aerc! La 23endata ticsighte ar its cuatomara ar on accoant of anq injurie�! or d+amagee raaulting from or cannacted 1n Qaq way with anp brea,k ar leak ia any �aatcr mafn, aeaviae pipa, connectian flr eppurienancaa c�wrsed bp Mendata &6ight� �hat maq aaaa�C �rom tha $upply oE waotefi by the Honrd to tkMdtt� Neighta. - . • ' Metulot� �%fghis further eovenauta $ad agr¢aa to inde�ani�y and aava haxm],r�ea tixa Baazd aL' t7aLer Commieaiun�ra at Saint pav2, the City of s&iat Pmu2 anfl any ar iti.l oE thsir oEfieers. agenta� eu�ployeea and a�ervaats Pram eap and a2i ciaima. dauiaud�� acticn� or caueea o� acticn oP wb�ttever nature or character e�ri�ing aut aP or bq reanon ot e�oecuticn ar perfoz�ance ot the wnrk gxavided tor kereia or permitted pureuaut ta ths pravfafana o� Lhia agreemant Please ntum to �y�tjEtt DEWtRTN�sSi, CITY 9� §j: �'t�#� -:i. ' ' ' . � : .'. aad' fttrther agreas tar indemnffy, at its acie expense, any actian or prnceeding , '� ior�the pvrpoee o� anp aiaim a� whatever nature arieing Txereurnler. . � 9 . QUAHAN'PS� � SUPPiY " • •�The Board agreea ta Eurniah ell water requireme�s aP isendota Asigh�s under ttie t¢rma of thie contraat� conditiona aad provieioas as herein provfded �ubfect to the qualiPicationa hereinbetore aet Eorth. . it is agreed by and betweez� the parties hareto that the terms,� proviatana and conditiona aut7.tned in this a;reement aha2i be appYiesble anly aa batw�aea the partiee hereLo and sh�t22 not aiEord to conaumc�re witl�in Mendota Hei�ghta�aap righta ar interesta hereuncier. . - . - 1Q. t)0f7NV"ffitSiQ� 'x0 WBfl7�5ALli ; . Tha Baa�cd a�ea to alloc� Meudota 2iaights the optian aP aonverttng frnm a retail baafa ae aut2ined iu33rein to a whcleeale baste i,n Whole or in part far obtsining tas.ter £rom tha Hqardi auch coaversian m�ay be aacomplished by giving � .. . . tha Board ''tarl.tten notice of at lea.st eighteen (I8 j months it► advance a£ thet ' dat+m�;u�son whic3i •Men�teta Hefghte deeirea ta make auch conveiraion: A aripp3.esr�ntal agreem�n� covering.the terms ai auch whaleaale,hasie of eales� tc 'tie'e'xecuted by bnth perties'betore partial or complete ahan�eover Erom r�tail t4 wha3esa2e is ellawed. ' � . % 11. U58 C�► SUPPLEMBN'TAL SUPYLX � 7�his agreeu�nt si:a12 not preclude Menciata SQfghta from eetab3iahfng �a poxticn�aC it� water apetem to be ,aupplied bq wa21 water in nreaa whexe water �upply �rom��he �eard fa impracti.ea3 or ur►caorkabie� or i.n.such cagea where +� central �aater su�ply apatem m�y be eaastruetssd ancl inatailad for a housing dev+alapa�ent pri,or to the tfine that water mains auppZyf.ng Lbe area wi.th watear purcttaeed �'rom the Basrd can be extended, Eio�.7ever, in no case shali there be ciirect catuteetfana with fihe Board's aupplq eyatem with other euppitea, anfl when tite BoerB*s aupply sqetem is pxactice2 and wqrkable, tha ather eup�lp sha11 be diaeontfnued. -9- x'A7ER 0@ppR�B r�;Urn to . MfN% C17Y Oi SI PhUt , . • ..,• - . ," . . . . • : ��- .. �,c=� ... , . . .. , . • ; . � m �,fn.r: � � . �^ 12. IIrP'ECI'IVFs• DATB 0� AGRThi�1T ' ' • The date of u�aki�, and Qntering this contract and tha data of execitt�'on thereof•ahall be ahown ae'the date when the Comptrbller ot the Cfty � of' 9aint-Pau��countersigna thie agreement. . .a ' � ' T'his agreement shall not be bfnSing until the sas� hae been �, �:;� accepted by resoltitiun of the Board of Water Cammisaionara of the City of ;� � Saint Paul, the Council of the City of Saint Paul, ard tbe Village Council of :; = . - ' Mendota Heights. " � . . �� / / . . � .•:, : • �, �g f; ''-.: sence e .. . � G���� . _ . oo�Z . � � � . .. . ` t ' ' Count aigned thie ) �� i " ,��ilay. ot � , 1962 �s . `<� LtysOamPtroller - P� C ��. K V C . �=; � Approved se to form: - o �Corporation Cavnael BRIE!'ED -10- Please rotem to N'A7ER DEt�Tp�T, CITY Oi. Si. PAUL . 7'HB VIId.AGS CF MS�OTA HBI6HTS gy �in'1�,�: �\l���1 , Maqor • • • $Y_ wt't�wt.ue',�✓ � �� Pillage Clerk�— . ' , �S;.J' BCIARD �, WATLR $$YOIZ6RS OF' � ��°�jP �iS CITY`OF 3A . ..,PaUL� ' � � . y � . : .. . � �� � � h �;:r: Generai=Manag�r � . ... Approved ae to form and execution this �[�'Z day oE �, i�� 1962. G�� Carporat o Counse2 :; ' ..•f.. . ..... �..�.......'....,�.,.._ �.�-.r—.—.e-� � ;a • . t ,y.' ,u, -'Y _ � . .. , C '�,f�t,•��� ��v��,: '� � ' o �r) �'��r �+ � 1 �a��� �� c.�.: iv+e�a...;ci,J��t'.�'.�%:i>�tTY�'` �+d�.y43;4��'a �.�' •1�, �. ,#a� �'y'� ia�i��7iS����.eY�v {}��."ixt �T'H1��'��, t( ;1r ��' �; a+c:..:.::C1L'Sl��%r,s'� � tr �,*i'+�.'�7'rae .�s�Lo, �: `t� { s AMENDMENT OF CONTRACT FOR WAIER SERVlCE •.between the BOARD OF WATER COt�fISSIONERS OF SAINT PAUL� MINNESOTA and the . CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS� MINNESOTA . On the � day o �✓ , 19 %�, this amendment of the contract made and entered into on the 14th day of September� 1962� by and between . the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul� a municipal utility ,located in Ramsey County� Minnesota� hereinafter called the ��Board" and the City . • of Mendota Heights� a municipal co=poration located in Dakota County� Minnesota� hereinafter called �'Mendota Heights". � WITNESSETH: •'3hat the said parties, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agree- j:F� •.ments hereinafter set forth, have agreed to and with each other to amend the said _. •:contract as follows: � la. .All that part of Section 5 of the contract of September 14, 1962� is hereby •deleted from the contract and in place thereof is hereby submitted the £ollowing: ��he charges and rates to Mendota Heights consvmers shall be those �in�effect at the present time, which are as follows: Demand or Fixed Charges , . � 3/4'� or smaller meter $ 3.15 per quarter � '7." meter 5.40 per quarter , '�'1/4" meter .2.50 per month • �1 1/2'� meter 3.85 per month ' �ti�2" .meter .7.15 per month ' 3�� meter 19.35 per month �4" meter '32.65 per month . 6" meter 66.55 per month 8" meter 121.00 per month , , �10�� meter "193.60 per month :. '12�� meter '266.20 per month ::��;," -� v 0 �% ` ��� : '.J " =7.J �Iy1• '' .t��3v:,i>8:1�1�i�:�:�:�k;3;ra�.; .�..,✓.. ,...k; �a;n-u+"r�;w`:X3.';:i�i�;�..r. �.e_. ~"1' , . . .. . . , 'tiJ?LY�o'kttWAw ,w.a........ � � I . � . .. _• - ' . , % , / �� . 1��::' Consumption Rate First 50�000 cu. ft. of water per month at 47¢ per 100 cu. ft. Next 450�000 cu. ft. of water pe.r month at 35¢ per 100 cu. ft. All Over 500�000 cu. ft. of water per month at 23� per 100 cu. ft. subject to adjustments to be made during the period of the contract in accordance with the foliowing conditions: - lb. Demand or Fixed GharRes 3/4'� or smaller meters -- the charge for such shall be twenty (20%) per- � cent per annum ovez such charge to Saint Paul consumers. lt� meters -- the charge for such shall be twenty (20%) percent per annum over such charge to Saint Paul consumers. . . Meters larger than one inch -- the charge for such shall be twenty (20%) percent per annvm over and above the charges�to Saint Paul consumers. ic. Consumption Rate , Each step of the consumption rate outside the City of Saint Paul shall be twenty (20%) percent over and above the rate charged to constuners in Saint Paul. ,' For simplicity in accounting� the charges and rates shall be to the closest whole cent. In no case shall the charges or rates to Mendota Heights exceed the charges or rates to other Board consumers outside of corporate limits of Saint Paul for like service. 2. Add a new Section 3-J to the contract of September 14� 1962. Section 3-J to be as follows: - • An annual zeview of the Board�s standards� rules and regulations as they re- , late to Mendota Heights•shall be held with representatives present from both the City , � of Mendota Heights and the Saint Paul Water Utility. The meeting shall be held at a time and place agreeable to both parties. -. 2 - ... _;f.. ._..--�_,m„T,..,,r..:... «.....r..,.a "K.' ::i:l.l:r.C•. •1: � �.: �'.: �F 0 3, Deleta Seation fj-A t�PROTEGTiON SERVZCE AND HYDRA1�iT USE" and insart in its stead the Eollowing: � ' 6. PROTECTION 3ERVICE AND HYDRANT 11SE • � A. Fire Protection Service shall consist of a fire hydrant mai.ntenance cast oP �5 per hydrant and a sCandby fire protect3qn charge of $10 per hydrant� which total charga shall be paid annually or semi-annually and shall be based on the number oE hydrants at $15 per hydrant. The hydrant maintenance charge and the standby charga shall each be subject to adjustment subject to mutual agreement, conditioned� however� that Che maintenance charge shall be no more � than is chargefl private gazties in the Citq of Saint Paul and provided Eurthex that the total charge shall be no mare than the minimum charge to any outside area being furnished water on a re- ' tail basis and into a distribution system owned by such area. G. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT � .'� � The date of making and entezing fihis amendment oE the contract and the'dafie of exacutfon thereot shali be showre as the date when the Department af Finance of the CiCy of Saint Paul countersigns this agreement with the exception that the new demand charges and consumption rates as fixed by Paragraphs ib. and� lc.s above� sha11 became ef£ective on water b£liings rendered on and after January 1,. 1977. • ' . ,. 3 ., : �• J A 's� � � i . -'This agreement shall not be binding until the same has been accepted by xesolution of the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul, the ' Council of the City of Saint Paul, and the City Council of Mendota Heights. In the presence of . ��-��•:.,..% �/,� �1u�-�.:��� � :.r; ._..:e �. w�.� �� . In the presence of c.� ��,z a� . �� . :�n.�..fz �- ti � fJ ( �' , �� APPROVID : General Manager Approved as to form: . � ssistant Ci Attorney � .Approved as to form and execution 'this �_ day of , 19�. Assistant C' Attorney THE CZTY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS sy: � c�. /v'-t�-�/v[ � � � Mayor � BOARD OF TH � By: � City Cleric f �--.� President By: � '_' / 'r� Secretary COUNTERSIGNED THIS � day of �e �G,�,�.� � 19 %� Departmen ' ance - 4 - . �'.�ew � t • � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �� � Apri12, 1992 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adm' FROM:� James E. Danielson, Director of Pub c Wo � SUB7ECT: Bridgeview 5hores Utilities DISCUSSION: At the March 17, 1992 meeting Council instructed me to order Excel Utilities Company, Inc. not to install any more utilities withi.n the Bridgeview Shores 3rd Addition until after the matter of the replat was resolved (scheduled for the May Sth meeting). Excel has responded to the order with the attached letter, in which they ask for reimbursement for backhoe rental. Their backhoe is now stranded at the site beca.use of Mn/DOT and County load limits. I called the State and there is� no projected dated for the load limits to go off, it all depends on weather. When talking to the State they did tell me that they would issue a special exemption for moving the backhoe if the proper hauling equipment is used. Because of the size of the backhoe involved, it will have to be partially dismantled in order to meet the•State's requirements. Exce1 would agree to move the backhoe provided the City fund the costs. Costs to dismantle and move the backhoe are estimated to be $4,400. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Deny Exce1's request for backhoe rental (possibly exposing the City to legal action. Daily Rate = $ 1,300 Weekly Rate = 3, 850 Monthly Rate = 11,500 2. Grant the request and fund the backhoe rental costs out of assessments to the lots. 3. Work with the State to get a special permit to move the backhoe before the load limits go off. Chazge extra costs (estimated $4,400) against assessments to lots. ACTION REOUIIZED• ; Review the problem and select a course of action. .�C � r Y�^ n n> ,• � • G��:. rk:�c;�,r�� �la! -21.�1i N��of�� -�-D M S�.Ji1 �JSo J , March 30, 1992 '°�:sy^p;`"i s,t.�a t;sJ.' F�d''�i�i�B '�b••L�iy�'.•i' .:! j.��r..;?� �`T.t•'i.. � ����ro x, � •�U'TILITI6S ,� � , *� �: ����������i�.�.: � 'v.'SYvy%sx �,tla:f'-t'� -�,�u"ffl»�-%Co.�:(,�na. =�t�ti.�'k'�. i •Gi �` s,t'°��=P�iT=l;�Gre+ Excel Utilities Co., Inc. 8829 215th Street West, Box 399 Lakeville, Minnesota 55044 (612) 469-3461 , ' r � James E. Danielson, P.E. City, of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 RE: Bridgeview 5hores 3rd Addition Job No. 9110, Improvement No. 91, Project No. 5 Sewers, Water, Streets Dear Mr. Danielson: We are writing this letter in response to your letter dated March 25, 1992, in which you ordered Excel Utilities not to resume any construction on the Bridgeview Shores 3rd Addition until notified by the City to do so. You also stated that the earliest possible start date would be after the May 5th Council meeting. On February 26, 1992, Tom Knuth called our office and talked to the o�,mer, Fred Fredrickson. Mr. Knuth requested that we move our backhoe on site before the road restrictions came on to expedite an early start on the utilities work. We honored this request and moved a 6644 koehring backhae on site. This machine is now land-locked until the road restrictions are lifted. We have other work that could have co�nced April lst if this backhae was available. Due to the fact that we tried to do all we could to expedite the job and are now stopped by causes beyond our control, we feel we should be reimbursed for backhoe rental from April lst until the road restrictions come off, or we are able to corrmience work. Thank you for considering this matter. Sincerely, C�/�� � . ,{�„ ��� ti %.•� . ���/L� T �' ''�Y Charles B. Reocrd President � po:t-ri" 6rand Fax Transmittal Mema _t�t�(v� +L+�h�t�t..5'�,C1t.± . "`""�"yC`{�'ty O"� �ME,,.iBb'TA !�'rs . P 01 7�72 Na. of Pages ' ' ToCay�2t�Z /q Z nm• a�� s f+�W� � From ��UC,1E t��.CaR-L� Company ��E�.. i�T�l..��il�"� � ; t,a,yp� Locatbn Dapt. Charge � • ;F�� ���.— ���� ���,o�ff� �.x� T'`� �b�- 3� c. � : j��� 4riginal. pestroy � eturn Caqtorpidcup Disgasiuon: � R ❑ • t � � . . � ' �. , � �. 1 :' �� , . ___.._.... _...,___. Att.��h d7nrc:K����: �: t inu -- -------------------------------------------:--�._--------------•---_______--------•---------_. Ii4:02/82 08:32 '�812 884 22,�3 HAYUE�—I�tURPH}` CO �001 . . . . �, . :;;:;� '.. � � • , ' � , . iy'�. �C� D�RAULZC SXC�lYA'Tt}RS. . , r-~.�Tl•;• 66d� 6612 � 6&20 s�x� 562y d633 ---,�' �€`�9 1068 a i 6, i�Ql� 27,3�l�� 42,555� 38, �OQ1fit 62, OO��P � 70,992* 98„000� 16$ r �tlQ� �� �UO �q0 600 e�a 8S0 9�t0 13�0 2Z.S0 ���i/'lI' V "�*��1�i! �✓� L�/'� �/ � � �.•�:�' T ' ' � ��'�����.+V � ��� � �/ �`�/ . NlSLi1 .9QQ ' ���i� t '700 235fl �500 2?00 �850 67�0 � 26t�tI 3�00 5t?00 i000 7'S00 8000 11500 Zt?004 ,:� ` �q', r� .�•�- _.�_:.:� � � -��..� e � urveyed Far..,,�..�..fe;G! ., 1 � '.: ' .�.',�.UT� �. 1�InC�AG�`r��1tiT '$� S�}�1 � • • • ' • • • • �940 So. Robert Skreet � ' � - . Wes# St. Paul, MN 55118 ' Minncsata RcgiztcrcJ land Sun•cyo�s ' � rJ . ��! Hereby Certi�'j► tha# tliis surveY, Plan, or regoit was� pregared bj► me ar unuer �my d'uect supervision and•that I'am a duly�Itegist�red Land Surveyor under the l�w� of the State of Min�esota.. , •. . . ...:..,�:.�.........� ...................k.....�....,..�.,:�.,....�» .. . 1'AUL J..McGI:NI.EY, R,I..S. � � . ��=1w...ru.N. m..u«..am..nww� .� «� �w.«..� ' • � � i"� - - �f�.� •��%a-�-�- - r � �'. 1 ' DESCRIPTION Par:.B "' ' . . The east 10�4.Q4 feet af the west 150.04 fee� o� L'o� 37 of Auditor's Subdivis ian Na. 3 Mendota, acaord3.ng �o the re- - corded plat �hereof an fi3e in �he oifice o� the Caunty . Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota. . � �• . � ' . . . . . . . '°'� M ' --�'�;�4'?t�-��-�----�-- --�'�'�'��a�r��--- -���--- - � . . � M vj L�i � .;*• :;... IRNOSCAPE T/M�3ER8--� (CR,PDEN1 BC�PEEN HOUSE �' ...:u. � . ,u �td� o � a c.�a � � o°rocu ' , o cn a� .:� • '04 M��t v 1,� N t� a � � � � v � � C� � U C z a� a �� .� O .� rr� .� 4-t � k—t . s� S; i.s w . O Q .. H O � �i�.t G} a..�'i w a°�i `� •� � v° a� w�b�a ' o Q o cu � O 1'`� U s—i 4• • c�'t U •�-1 ..�: O c1� 4-1 td r�-i O n G A a�so ., � �w o� a�i � � C � i%t .� N �` �.0 � : H LN r� �.► i� i�•' FOUNO /RON P/�''E � NIT. la'29 .r G�h' LtNE rw�vu in"c+ir ri.-c. NO. !ZZ{�4 tT.3 �Y'v,?iX nc I/NF �..�.�.�.v • DE'NOTE9' ' SP�'YNKLE�C' HEA4 o �/4" t�PON P/F�' SET �''/6049 r:`?���t��'�l4.��t� ���dliSYn;.5:+�1S:,�i�.s. .a. . �- ; �— ------- .' - ' _.__..__. et.���t��' ��.�y��v¢ �~ i �• , .y.;:�:f . i.:F%���s+7f':t �7aiN�ni1/+`�`!.. �'��"1�%�� i::'� .,. r� :. ;`�� : ^ ...... :-' �� ::;'��.�A:Y.7� �. i1/IC�.c�.�'ar�.�' & 5�1�7 Nr�.r �� " �..� ;?'a.•. ::; � ?; > • •';: " ��: tr' ;�'� :.': ' :�::� "' • • • • •940 So. Robert Street . �°'�, '�" ` .�'", West St. Paul, MN 55118' . �.= 'n �:r , . o� . �,o.�' ♦ � • ' ,9:�.�i ;`,,•'.:.: n,�. �', ..t... '�° ',�„ �,��1- ° � i�'; . ..��:r �'i � • . Minlusoca RcgistcrcJ Land tiun•c�•nrs � !' �, . �' • •, y � ��;;: �'�' ,: ,•'e .r;,�� �: 'y. , ,i� �� �; ���tir.y,�,,�; , ;,�' � • :;r, � t`r_ hx y' ..'. .'.:y:.... ' •�� L'i. �k��:� �J�. 4�� �,��' s�°''! He1'e6y Certlfy that tliis survey plan or report was pre recl � �.��`�.r�': .;;`.'• ��€`�;�;� ,.,:, ,�.}:., . . , . pa by m� or un�cr .F�C T :�1: ���+ ����d'3f�.GS'. �a� Mitr ,_r „r �,�� :4�� 't �"n.F r;my' direct supervision sind th�t I am a duly Registered Land Survayor under tl�� � G.� ��(:� �?'�:� uc-:�.=�;,,�x:.� :.7.t- � �' � � j~ � � �� � � �K'».•lawS of tho State of Minnesota. ' ' ' . �:#`�i��:'. c'." 'i ,3�%1 Y :I�:�',R�4• �N�' M. j :��� ,�r��'4.��'., � • . .�,'Gi�s' .:'v:; . r"4rF�t1•:i1:` . . 'r?��' �•:.Iti: �i� . .. '�+�.M; a:,t.::: .1�.. �.5. ��. . . � f. :f�yr`1` -"�.i:XS�� '' . . . • ;.y.•�FiGfA�:.•.�I]LlGIA'i;6;t{.:�r'•. . .• • . �r�ir r�/ .T . �irv�yed For.....::r....�.. r.....,....�::,,:�.�....,.�..�..,,�.....�.w��.... , ..w..�...�» . . • r"�.ui �. nic.�,u.L�. � , P..L.S. afa ".,:�.,;: °;'✓v/ : �.���:��;�; �::, • . �.... ,�. w..w....,.�...,�.�,..w,.....�..�...��..,.�.�... ;ale'tFti� . .�.�f/i�iC =.�0�:{,�� ;.,�.;,;.,.�.�,.»�.��:,.,...,. , '�� G� • .... .. �;t:.�.>..� . � , � . . � � , �� . `�:.,� , � - . . ., . '. � • - • N. RECISTRATION N 099 � , . . . Vl eu� i��� Vt ' .� � .. . .. . � . � ` ' ' . C.) /� � � •J .� ' .' . . .�+ '' �, ,'� ' ) ? n; i t .�1 • ' , , � � � C. :� l_U'� ` . � (, �. . : ; ; ���� �� DESCRIPTION Par.• B . ' Ttie. easr .� f�et . of the west 150.00 feet of Lot 37 of ' � .. Auditor's��Subdivision No. 3 Mendota, according to the re- � corded p1a��thereof on file in the office of the County � . Recorder,'.;;` Dakota Coun�y, Minnesota. , , � . . .. • � o ' . 5 s .. . � ' . - • v r'� - �-t"�-�— - - . �::�:.;. ' ��L�e.� ' '.:�:. '. :-"'�.� •��':> :;i�;:,;:'" � ' • . :: .t ,�', '•o �� ... � ;i;':?:.:�.: , �:an`L��,t4r,: : i � I�l� �j � � O r;"!�' .. ��: :,:.. � r��... � � M 5,.: , :�f.{;. t�;-.� ::� ��, 7� OCd V�,� �h�-wQr . . r• .. f�::S.� ( �r'. � � • . . . 't �•Y�4�-� � �— ��� � -- ' •' '{ '� '�a...�.r' Y.�.�. •-'--,.:� '� •-"-' -- • ,� . •�r-�%1� {'t.'; 'r,�:;�..� y. . ., .. . ... ::S � '��1,� �y .`t�%^. ..r. . . ! \ � ^:�•y���:'� y =.<:;:�.', �':•�:�;;�� °'' % • / ' �� � 1 ^ � � � > . ' :'!. . „:,J. i�f`i- I �� ,'y o� . .� � ;::;�: 1 _. �� .*;::`.�, ':.t:• �• • ;' • 1 ,. � . ��, :;: . �. � . . ::�..., . _ , :;.;;,' :; .. , . : � ,•r�..,' � -, . `�• ������,'�,.', •I'• �•t..;<._;�� �� '�; i :v ;TS . • i I♦ .. •~ . . • , t : �� .,h,� '���'�' � ��' 1 , ' , . ` .�'.�v � . , . I , ! •� i}t..jt. � " h ' : V, . �.�.��` ..�,., .. .,, �--� , ' . �->` ta.i r' �� .. :.� {y ;n• •'�sy,�, ��, � � I � K.J� HOU9E ���) �.Y' ���::4�"r�..�'�: � •h ' ' • . .:; { r,. - '•�:y1 -.�Qr.u.s� � ���x. �. CRiYDSCAP� �T/MBERS�• ` '�„•-� � �:`; . ,. '�ICR�PDEN1 �'a:�� �,' �`� :;' . M I ..�.rt�<'� :..: •. . liyy�;�- :BC,PEEN HOUSE -�' �� . �� �-- � � 1° , ''; ,`; � . .�:, . •' i:' :__-'��:,� � . . . . . ., v : •4�'.,ii.: :��': .. '"4�t I w.��`.. • , . . 1' 4� � : • 'u. : � � � .ra �'I � � i • .. � � 1"'� O ' . . ' O ` o, ; o a c� : ;` .. ` �. �. /� � � , � _ _ . _ I �. =j — — -- � { o"•r{ 'ts � l, � • . _ .0 �.�' � o; �n a� .� "�• '� . O 0 • � M;,t� � � • � . ' � ' `• �0 r , ' O S� . �.i : •�W w b � � ' � ao 0 cd• • v��•v u� o m � .. . _ cM � p+ �..n � � ' � . •.3. •� .s� a,i` C . ' � � ' � 2 :Y:/A •.}: V �� . "Y. .� ' � �l ! n V� O • .. � ^, �i �.1 T �j � . • � iJ r i-1 . w ',l� �, : �...p O 0 �•' '. • • � • ��K =1. ,O rl 1.� 'N' �� �• , ) ..n{ •'.�.) ;�.:�:ij�;.�. bD��.l�.!''. . .` .. . . r ",.� ''l 'l�-'.•�r�3;_C� C ,:. O . • , � � , • � _.. .r{ , �,+. V . , , a -� `�, . 4-I''U rl � � ' • : ' � . 'o"r��'�`i• O ia • � RT I ` _ . 1�• V rl . O ' _ ; o • . . u(� • M CJ �r{ �G ' �' �wA� ,' •. . . .: �. �'., 0 w 'C . l, .'� ►-3 � O w ' . .! - . � �+-� � o �+-i a�'i . � � I 2 �5 �_.. , • cd o �v o v . . � � a� � a� � '� • � Z�� � ';,-�,, �, �a�s�o . , _ .. .•.A� h,. a� a� � a� � � . . . �; � . .. . � > ,a a� ... � ; . . — r.: � o .. .. . �� > H w M � a . �� �s:4a � � � }_,.;�,.. o.s� _ . �.�=Z� ' i '� ^ 9B.86 ' _�� --- -.. . � i , .—.._ ---= . • • �.t.,�, 4 !3 � � '. . , , . ! FOUND /RONP/.PtY:� • OE.vo�Es' Sn.�';N�:':=.•' •' FOUNO /ROiV P/�E � � i� o / • 0 3/a • , �o�v �ii�c' s';. r' ,. , N0. /2�94 A�►' �i�'6' N0. •/2294 O. 3 NoRIH , i OF L/NE. . �i �Du��y S<�N G� jl� G �� l�-� �R.uS� J �, .y ; f �JZD��� ��1�.. 1 ws��r.t-r4f7Dn,? �.a,��.y srt3t��y �r�-scNao�.- prsr, r47 e IHy! g�,' � ���� J�� 7�� , / tv0°� Q�t. kt� - �,+0��0 P'-��rc �d� �� W�lJ\1lt11 U ��U � L� W!l��� ,��'�-1�W��L'� � � � f � � ��. � � ' �. At�toX az,' � � ° _ , ... � _ � � � -- '� - , \ •,�/ � i /� ' r ' � � ��' -- /41d TG" 1�- 2�` �---Tr � -- � �P]'�Oti1 rrc.- �ROOF w�OdNTsn �� n�1— ` ( gy sc rrao i.. Drsrrtc c7^� `,' - • FtXTrrttss n�o"i vft�pt� �i2oww G'It0 o aM y'� . "" . � . _ - so,rnr �u�'U+�7'ton.3 . - ' ,Uo s�.,a-c-c�- ♦ (?B �Gio w G7tl,,p,�,`�-L \W �va ri�' �F -- -t►�r5� c.�w,.� u�� s f�-. �r.�o a•u . � �'.As7- E rc-� h• �c 7r� /� �..s.- V �s t �t u� s P�K- L r c-�-2*�tS tJ} � ,� (�ftG^ti�sl +4i�i� ` C 4 1 r ,�' = ^"� , . } �` _ . -� , � jb s � . .{ •. C7 z H S � J � Y -1 � N 1klf10� IP131A3'.�QIaB i j ��i i�ii ��i�i ����� ��� �i �� � �Jd ��i i �� // i i i i i i i i � i i i i � iUl/ll�//, � � , � I � � , � � , , sao6ti� ,�id ,ry�t�,;, ,� , , , , ; , , , , � � � � �� � � _ II�II1�� \ �A � � � �• - • !� �ii�ii/� n i i� � �� i �i i .����i i l / �" j ��..�il���ll�l/'/ °' . �i I ��II1���� �`.A�` ��A ___._' '�� i iii/�i ij i i � l � / /i�� � /i�� / � ��1�/I/ / �� � � i � � �� � A r� ��� _ � __i12._i� ii/ii�( i � � � I � S � / � / l/ / � /l l� I �`� � � i/ ! i:yci�SlYi ii /// � �` � — I 1��._� � ���� - � ii;.•�/,i � � �� � / / , •i/� �i � /� U l�l/�� 1 -�" �•� I li� \�.�`� �_ ; .- - i 'i � / l �/ >e�ii�i'i i i ��i l� /�/ N ° � � I / � � � � � �— `-_, ��i i �� �i�� � �� � �a i � j � /l�% � l �/�/ll - ��� - ��; �--I'f-�i��ii i 3,l : `� � i � l _���.� _� ,�, _ �l m:� /i i i //�/% �/�l � I ! � \�. , _-- --,- � i i i i / I e•s/ i � l / //il /l/ . - \ � (`')i _', � �` '___'-;,' ;-'' �' � i / / �\ � / � I � 1 i2 i� l / /�� / / . i � i � �A_ _- ,- � � i i ' i � I I � I E � i � i� ���/ �/l �i/ �i� � � �� i i ��� i .� -- � i i w- �i/�/i/�i �i�/ / i i � I � � � �. _- i ! � 1 _ � / / � I I � � �i � � �� �� ��/ �/ ��l - � � � � /�i � `>� � ♦ �, rJv�iasbxiovnans �- � � i I / I I I � // l /. � l� lli / � ! ' i �- . -_� � / --, � ; � _� � � � I � a � ��n � /i �/� i li� i 8 � '� � � ` ` _ -�o°�_-- �, � ', ; '� i- i � ^ - e . --'i ��i� � ��ni i ��i� ��, - / i �— '�/ �- --��� � - ���- �_ - � ��` '` i/ii�i//' i �' /�� // � II�v \ \ � j� /�,�- _ � \ �'/'.��i � Y � �_ j/j//�I��� � � l - 'g � li � \ � I i/ �' � _ � � � ♦ i . t _ - � `� �� � � \\ i / / �� �� � ���� � 1 � � i� � \ \ � .epx . � '`� i/ �// / /� / R ��� ,-__-,-�5 i i i I� i i w= a"� �o �y� \ ��s __-� � 'iiiii i/i� i � Z ,� ___ i � i i i m� I.' . w� � , -----�' � i ii i i� i ¢ , ���. �5i � I� ��.t'�,�.� � ���� � a.0 �� �� � �� � - �_ Cs �� � _� � _ iij//%j i � � o /��-_ j � � �k^y4�r„`�I II 1\\oLd-,� � S� / i i � � 1 i ' �~y \ `` ` ___ i��// �/� � / _ i j a �I ��� � � )•�' ? ' / l. / y � C7 / i �, M19'q i�� e ch. � � � ��� �,_ ,/� i i � i i C I - I �"y� I I �` �� �� i� / � ^ry \�� %/ % � ��` op �� I � ° I � � �� � a l � r �` �/ / / / / I ✓ I v � i � f � -�i / / / / (9 / 9 �F � y � �W u�i >� V F WaF b i W a° o p so � m 3a Iy a i t ♦ "r i / i ���/ ``\ � �n ___�__ I _�� \ , q \\ _ � ___/'' '90 \ � � � � T. �1 � i 1 � 1 rw 1 . i _ 7/ �S_ \ / /� � i . 2 1 � I 1 I it / � - \\ G �� \\ i / : (% � � i i r if �"�-- �\` � � / / � / J � I r { � � � i / � ' � � _ _ � � � � / i / / � ���I I i.i ! o � � i ��,i J' ����� ��//i ii �/ i Itl � I � i 'x 1 � � � 1 I i i i i / / V- LLI 1� I � � �. � i� � � `__ � � � I � i�� /�� � � �a^^ � fA (�_� II � ' � i r '____�� o � _ �1/ji/j /� � / /'^�___- _ �� n� � c_- i / / i� -___ � i�i� � � r =? r /ii�i/ / i i� _ �� .'' j I i / roOs / �'' � " � � �� / /?0 1 ��i� /�/ i / ��� N �� � ' I III� �� ___ � � ,b` i /i/�// � / /��"________ pI �' �' � i � �, yr i i� i/ i / i, � � �� \� `J � � a,. / � '�'x4 _'.i%. � �'� 1W � �/i��/ � / /i���_-______ Vl r i � � � i /:ii�� 1u,-\ , /jl�ii O i � - �_ (� I �� • � � _ �ii��•� � //ii�„ _-__ - w 7___ +..�I � � � � \ i a � I/i//i�/ � /'��i�' ___ � � �, �� -N `.r§ , � . __s� .� �U�ii�� � �.���i,-- __ O �-� �� l�� -F.. ' 1 \ �7 � , � %i���� � � � �%i/i%-, � ` � _ � � �` �' - i-�� / /i i i� / /i i � � � �. �� i c7 � �Y, ♦ � i � i� ///i i �� � / /i��i� j: :_ �__- _- � I .9 m � � � �i � �/�i/// / / //�/�i/i ����- Q m '' �� I' � _ � 1i � � � W �Ja`\ � < � = 1 � i /��/��i/ � �� � L/�i������� � ��- ='�soo f" �'� _�I � �ou � mF 't � \ 1 //r/i//� i � �/i ��!; iiC_ Q I-o i a` �W,�� \�� � P � �' .��n/iii� i i i/C,j��c',�- � 1 �dV `+ � �C"� al I I � � ii/i///i/ / / i� � _ O �- II� �a �y\ a+ � so� i i a� ,� i � i�i�i� i� i i�� .� ��i- ��- U _Y I Z �� ` a a� i / � ' � ///�i i/ / / � �ii C ��_____ W $ � �� �'mu� i i � Z /i// i��/� � / � � � O 1 �� ��� � _� ` ' � 1 �i i //i����i/ i, j � � i � O � ____ � � ` � , / ili � ii i i � i /� 3 \�� �� � �� 1 / ^�' \ � _� R' -__' � i � /i/i/ i i � �i � i� � S � � i �' 'y °' i'.\ \pppj � . � ta �- , jll�ii �% / i I � / �� �� W I� � i � /�� ,I � 1 . 'I =' - � l i � � - / / ��! Z � �IY"I i' \� I �/� / �l��lil/� I / / � / �900 'i i i � � I�i _ i J�'r� i, _ i��li i� i i �. � � i.�„ e 3 I\ \ � i , � ,_ - , �� i�� i i i „„ � i I �� i 1\ i f .ca � � �9! , -'7� i; � �, � � ' � . - :� : � � I\ \ � � / 14 ' / � l=` �II/��l � � /�/�%/ •} i�'� �� �� i l I �� iiillll i i i����i��� Q I ` \\�. - � ' ' - ---- -- iii�i�l i ; ��i'�ii� a �` �� �\ � i I ,-�I���II � i l �j��i/ f Ti��� 1 � I i � �� �II � 1 ///�// O we�, '- � I .°4 � il���� i � �i % U � � �k � �i � ij�lll ! � � il�/� O I�tltlki3�M31A1$3Miijj �, . � / z i v �� g'� rl I ' ���i�l � i��i�/ � � -- ' ,� i , '•� i f ; ��iii i � i,ii� � \\ iil � ` i� i �_i i II�II I �'��III� F- ♦ li I � I ��� � i� II I I�11 0 � � ii�il � � � `��I�U i � ill� � � / iiiPp� `� i ��. i ', .'t�l�j I I� ���� :_ � � j / i I IP' � „ � " �IIII � II I��� F I �I � � 1 .' � ill I II� , i �/ r��l .-- m � ���il i a a� i�ll ol� � 1 i i � I � 6. `A¢ �o,ll � � � il $ / / i � � o � �I � �-�� i i� ii _`•' I i i' ----.�I'li I �¢� � I�jl . . i-r-.� . i I � i i , a I i i� ^ n i� i�� i V I � ' -' i�lili I z. i U ,i�s i���; i' i A� � ": ;��, �iilll � p Oi � i�ll ad��z � l�i ' � � i I Wai I�IIII � ��I�I � I j� l i � i '� i'�� I � I I I I � 1 I I I �� � I i� i i �'" . � i� i i�il��l � 1 ��� � � � � i � � �: . w l i;; i i�il�n � � i I il I � PJI � � ' � :_ `----~ \ •�^i �i�l�ll i 1 1 � jljl j 1 � li I� � � 'o. ��� �- " wus� i�l��� l� � I ! � �� � � � - I 1��`� � �/ � ��� m� 1 �. �,ili��ii� I ( 1 I�III i � �\ � � � I u i _ � I�ilill � � � ii��� , i � � � � � � � _ _ . �_ liilili � � i ��i� S\ �� � � .'' � � � .�� 1���1�� I �J������90� I �\y\,/,�,li / � n�� �. 1 1 I��II�I � I � �I �.. / � i� � � 1 1 "�y_`__ � �'J�I���'I� � � � �I1 / � I � �j .��1 � � � / i� A1 �i I�ill I I � � i -_// i � i Y\� I�'j� —� I 1�3W]513C930D�S9W0� i ��I� i � II '�-� o I Il1( I f' I/ / � i' ����� I � I 9 �i� I � I �� -� O � i � i �� // � I� � I x: � 11 ' 5 . � . i- i � � I r--' 2_ 'i �' LL_' '' � i ' i' i ' � � q ��� � . i � ' ,� I � �d � I � 1 i � .�-� �'_ ,(: {¢ f�� i.or� �� � � � i i ' ; �; I , ; -- . � < �- o , . i � i , i .' - ,,,--_- . : � � o,, ; , , , � , � l I '� = �1�------'' � -- � . Y � � ,'' � ��, � i � � a � ii�� r „ _- - . � i ,i',� � � � i i �:- d �`� ' � � � � 1� 1 �� -- -��,�`�'3 .°'� i i � I �i ��` - � � � �/ � _-_� �� -_ �> �/' i� i' i I i � � �i � � "_,'��"_' / i i i \ `� - "_J i __'-' '-- ___'___' i i � ` 1` �_ _-_____ ___ __ ________ ______� / � � �`` _______________ � _ �al� '_'� \ �� .. �� J `\ —�-- avoa aaoa tsa� �H�1) --- --- • �' — ------- ------------------ = � " --- --- ` , - ----- —_-----------_-_______---- _' �� - -- - ------ - I I I� ��'� % ____ ZO6 _ _ __ _ _ ��• /I i � � � �� � ��" ___------------- c' i �� i i i':� �> ,� . �' "_________ W`m�z� .2cs * Om+ ��60 � . . . . . .. .. :::..a3J r.3.:.�':e. �" #.Ce:s'�!3C�'."w.''l"_ ..-: ,s. - ; ; 1df10� O z � S J � Y : � x�" 4 � 6J . yu W V 6 W[ r � �W 0 � �i + 3 qy a i � I i � / �-, I �. i , 'l �\ , i' i � � 1 r I II � � I �i `. W � �I�I �--. � � � � �- ��j �r - � � _ .\ .' il � � ` � � I I� �"\`\� J' � �' . .\\ � i; O-. � � � �__ � 1 {Q �i Vl �-' \ i( r � �'� � � i �_ , CO � � \_,� --/ �''' O � ��� � 0 � z � ------�' W � i � � I \ � � _ i �-- l i i �� ��o, � � I � � � i ��� ' � i � i 1 I � � � � 1 / i i � � i I � i _ I� I� I � _ � � � � � � I � � I \ \ ` / � � \ I I 1` \\,\\ `\`. . I � � � � � � i � �y-� =. i � ooe�_ � ' i � �i �I 1' I�� � \ �� \ � ` ',I, � o � / / / / / /8 / / / I � 1 I l � 1 /i/l//l�// � I II�I �1l \\\�� 1 � �� y' / / / / / / / / / / / l �/ S406M, LG� '`',t�`j,'�/�I \ i ,, % , � � �� � � iiiii�i,� IIIII I •� _• � �.ii�i i� i� �� j�� � i i���i ��i%i/ / i \��i�/ li /l l ��. �\ ��` -/li/ ii � i l l i o- II ���. ..�� �♦ ,-___.__ li � . i / l/ l l/ �III � � \� � --__ �i /ii i, i i �/ .� ii /� l l !I Il l� � I I � ♦� . n ��� _.C1L�%. iiii �� � � �� d � i l t i� �� � � / !l/ / � i I I._ � . . � � � �, ,� 1� i i �^.� �� � i �i i i r� l� i N ��. `�\� . � �� '�i i j I �� $. /' / %�l/� /�li,{lil � -� A:: �- --- ,= � � '�� '��I �� � � i�l �:�: � - � � ii��jiiiijiii .', � �\ �\ `` - ���-��_ � ���// � / � / / � 1/I i f � f'�� i �//i�/// / j� ��//�//l�lii / n i ��� . � ----� , �� '�� �� , � i i /ii �i��i��i� '-� i i � . ,\ --- �. r � � _- �' li � �i��� i � � ��/�//�/�� � i �� �\ / ��,, �»�unbraynanr �.ry �i� � i % I � 1 y � `.� \\ � l/ �/� �� �l�i� i •„�I � `� �_'_.' �__a°y____� ` � _ � _� i� <_�� � a . \ t ,��•__' �/���i����� � E ��� , . ��� ..__ .'� �� '�. . �i�ii�i/� i � �� .- � ` �� _4� - '°' ♦ �.�� - /i�ii�//�i � l i � � . \ i . e - i/ ii /// / I \ 1�1i�'.�� __� �•�� �.u.i �'_ .♦„� �� ii�/�//�� i �� ' i I � 1 i r�� � �o �N� � � ..y '\ __ _ � � �� i ��% i��/i / � Q � / i � I 1 � F i �` 'F�\ � , "_____ � � � _ �ii� //ii i � J � I i i ' i i ��y \ �"' �� ; � �� - --� • i`� --6---` ,� --'�'ii� i��' ' � .,, a , i i i i i`� r� �� i � �� ���� i�~ � `'___�i//�� / i� CZ_7 i � � �.'�. � i J � , . �� � i / I � � � � � � i � ! .'b � `\� �-__ �� � � i �, N I I1 ` \ \\ ` / 1 .� �� i// / i / � i ` � ' i at -� ��i / / / / (7 �� ��`� \ r i i i / Z I �' 'i \1 ` .�, `'�, , _ ' �t. � �, ; % ; �' � �, ` � � � , � , � , � i - � � � i , � ,< ; , .�-- '•`, � � ,� � � � �- -_ � ` � � / i i / � e � � il : i / , ' £ � .I_0 � �� `\ \\I\i ��/i i� / �// � / � � � "_ I �� i / i � / N � i �i i � __y�' : ' � � '' -.�°-� � �; j� ���i/✓ / .._ - n �\'�� i i r � �__�` � i � ` 4 /i/i��// � j /� ' _ / 'J� l.i'I /i/i� i / � '� . � d �� / � 1 �����/ / /, �/i � � �ii�// � /.-"_"___ i ___ ' / i ♦ /y iq i/ / � /' � -__- � � °4 i� � J' /i/i i� / / /q��___'_ _� / i �s. -- � 1 �'f ��i/ // / / /'i � .--- y ,� � ' J? � � e � //i�. / / / /� i:-_' _-- W � i d �� 1\ 4 0 / �i /����i / / / ��/i i �' -' __ _ � ..q _ � � --9� �. iii� i��� � ��i�ii ,- __, O _ \� i � ����//�(i / //i///�,_' " \ �♦ � ' .�1/��/i/ /� ` / //�i j���' � ��, � i .' �i!�/ii �' � / /i��i�i, . ,----_ ¢ �� � � �,�/�iiii i i i/%i�ii, _--�__- Q .� a � �/ / i/ � i i i�� �� �-___ Y �� tl `� � .'4 \ �`� � ' i �� /iii � �� � �/�4; /�� %�='t'= �vou �" � � �` ai `a `1 � ' / ///i%i/ �� // �ii� ' �� ��LC�_ � �` 3 � �3"' � I 1 i li/i///i/� / / �`� i��%�i%._-__ O .• I l I////�/�/� / / ��/�/,�� V \ � `���r I I `I Y/// //I / / �, / - \ $� � du� � �: � i"`' ���i!����� � � '-;��--' , o \ � � i j/i�iii/ i, i i' � � 3 -� � � � i /i/ �i i i � i� , ¢ � :Q-' � i iii ii i � i � �/��/ i v, i_� \�: � -'/ � r�a �-'�- �i ���/� /I i / � I � � �� � W �\ p � _,_ -' //l//j / i � _ . �� i " 2 1 ,' � ��hi�, 1 � � i . ;`°° : 3 � � I lpy/ / ` ' _ _ � I I �Il � 'i / � . i � � � i � � - .CL / ,,v�/� � _." 1'II�I � I ' / / ,���i / � i p i � 1� / I / /,'��� / �' � M1' / / � � � 4 '- ' ����1�� l r / ��ii%�/ 2 � / I � Irill�I � /� %i/� Q ' I I I 1 I I � �/ // 1 II11��� � � � ���j� � I ' _ '_" _'•�I�III � 1 I �����/ � �� .t4 � i ��II�� I � ii / V � Q �' k� } i ii�ll� � � i�� ��� � � '/ �� t I � �I�I�� � � 1 �/ %� j 1 i '�� S 1 �• � I % j���� � ��1�� � J / � � � � � i i i ���II � i�`i�ll� F- � � _� � i��ll � � 1�11 p i ' ' i � i � I I I I � I I I I ¢ ! �a. . ,'i��ii i I I�I� w I I I ' _ ; �- i�i�� i i i�il : r � � � �lill i � �I�� ro / ;I�it i a a ��I � � � �tl I � i II : i o I � �, A` ---- �v ii � a a i �III : � I i ��II�II I ¢ � I III � � _ II ~ � � • __ -` i�llll I LL Z i� �� ar � ^C 1iilil i O O i Jil i �i' 1�1 i ' j �� i �i � 1 � ,Z � I I I I � � I i 1 I .z � i i�il�il � I ��� 1 �F i w 'i �' �� i�iil�li � I � i i�l� . :r ( ,� �'__-� ���� i�i�ill � � 1 � �I�1 ;_ I o. o\ r' :��� ��i1l�l�ll � � 1 ��I�I � w�� o. 1 '�i�l���� � / 1 I �III � "' _ � Ijilill � I 1 I�i�� i � � � � _ liilili � � i���l . `� � _ ' ' ♦ - , � i � � 1 I I I � I � ` poc :g ♦ � I�II � ��li . ^� � � �� �i��ll�l � I 1 �I —_ � .�_1 _ - ',i�ijii' i I j I�`_. . i i i %��,li i� I i / � � � ' /�ili l I � / ' i . Ii i � i .' 0 /i�� ��j�.'�li��ll I - ' i / �i � I I � � � � ' �� �.\ �- � Q LLp � �� �� i� I I � � 'i i �% r�' � i o'_` �� r/,� � Q IW- ,Wi � p/ /�i i I i� /� - ��7 � �II I li -' _' < �' O i / / / I �I � I � f'W � ���___�-� `" ; C U o i � � I 1I /. I 1 I � o li��_'__ '1ry, - � i p � I 1�1 ' i I 1 � o I��I '�(,., �_ �� - � i / � ����1 ': �\ t� I I 1���__' �\ '�J�� a. / i 1 �1 �� :E � � � � 1 ��'_" ,�__"�`�i � / � i � I �� .; '� � � Ll � �__',=,`_' _' �„ '__ / i� i� i I t �; � °i: J \ \ _ \____________ __ '_ / _/____"- I � � , _'-_---_____ __ i • _'_' � ` i _ _, ___ ______ � i - � ` ----- -- - i - � '--- --_------- � _ - \a10. _- --1 \- /� �� � `\ —'--__, avoa aaoa cso�'H•ii -'�� /� --- --- ------- _�. � _---- -------- ---- ------ �,��� ; ----- --- .—__ �___________ __________________ �`�i`��� i i� % ' j '" -'- _-____ ====— -------____ = _:Doe______________ � �I i � �\ /� 1 � ' i C� _ __-__`_.-________' � �I�1�I�� i � I i i i� . �> )J `�)� , :� O�� W�� W � ' . � p • ,4i• A C 0 A U 0 J < <n < m o Q � � m� ��i�jj $ � � O U Y � Z . ° ° ° - : f L " '. ' ' ' = k F g � : C ;z��=�..;;�E�'::� , , � � � � � � k S y - E t�� s �` c c� c�� c e a C E E o 3€ ��. f._.. . C� I' ���� � � I � � � � � � � ��� Iii �� � F: i� �� :� Yf 3 a_ s' �� 'a: at�a k �ft �=�3 5"� :F. �fi ,��}$ t� �� O 15�=x t6��: � �i�� n Fie; ��jyE .` y t��d i3g"` d �.:r_ s^��r � a�F: �`"7F <C ''"t� ;a�y:g �) F�.'� k�f=➢ Gl � ;F .F Y.y � t�„9 F.�7E8 YE� ..T'g"� :�:Y .e8=e I `�9� �L.�L 3��i �arif v�:� � n a� �� x' b� kA ij �% 2� S� i� ;a � ti N d O Z O : c 0 U C O .y � W a � i a 9 v I I • � o a � � • u ¢ 9 � • � ! o i < a a .s �.- � �°- i � c� � _� 2 O N � y: 3� : o� � � � R � P-' � m I I I < J ' y � J y J J y. J F v � 'n : � m � � • w � � � a� _;�<�<;�<wn� � G(� u� � 6 U W F a a� � eg _ � ^ �e � � � a � 6 : � SY B �'a F � :9 � av = - i� c= B : ' S "• 3 � �� � sE � e- _ 7 ' :! . � �a % � �� ; ; �-� g : � 5; ifi f: t � ,. � g y9yyy E� yad5�� yF'� L f�� �F � fl�� I 8 i � 99i F' a- H gB2 �� ; 5�G a� � g i. g �� g$=� v t e� � y� rd :� R � � � N W � J H � N � � W 6 < U w Q �` � Z W a 0 T w W 2 � H Q 0 N W � O S G S i � � 7 O U O � � � w � 2 3 Y 2 a � 0 u c z � J f � Q W 2 f ri i: :i. i;i :�: �i: ;1+ :? °;' :; :i .� °�o ¢s :_ Y�'= � s2 C• ��Y• ad�• �i -1 � iano� N�na�aiaa '; I - \ \.,, , —T -'y- \ � - � � i � � �� J /� v �; ' � /i' � � � � i ilI ' � �� � I I � � � � � \ �'1 i � � 1 � , , � � �r � � � C, ' 'i 3 -��//� I S �o��'� -'= ;, i I I .//_�� i _ o �- - � . � . / , ��_ 'i . i ' I � ,-� I ,l� -' '. � `` i i � I _ � Ir I � �� N ��III W ^ �I��i �— i i I Q �. � � r - _ __ �` '-' i �i i �, ��� �.,� 1 II� �\. , = i �\ ��r i i iLJ \ \\�� I �_� ��\ I'r . � m \ \�_ —� �' �' � � �i � ' ,------�' � / � � I � ``, , ' � I � ( ,--- � \ . � , , I��,� , 1 I � � � 1 ii�� ,'� � � I I �I � �� �� �1 1� I � � I � � � � � � � II 1\ \\ \\ `\ I � � � .\ � � � �i �—. � ooe�� _� � 3�tltlkf3�M�Fl�l$3/�(M � � I � O ¢ Fa- 0 0 Z W � �i i i � `, � "� � � I����,��� � � , � � ` S0�614U,, i����i�`. �� � ' \ , i � �� �i' �,; . �� � � `. � ��., _ -, Il�li `\\\R\\\\`_ /!_'�_�� I�� � -�i_ _ , I��_`��\�� \\__ __ _�� i �\ �\\ \ � __ - i!� �-�_; � -\\���� ____�- �'�� � ii J il(���.��� '_l I .� � /� __ _ � `� �" ' � � � �� __ ��� �� fI \b Q�I � � .. - . � W \ � <i i i �o �a� \ :� ��g�Ql I I i \\ �`� �� $I ��ol j � � � 1 1 {� A W I;I�i � \ _ / � � � ����i<� � �� � � , i��� i��` �\ � � � �� � � , � i � \ � � � Y � r � � , / __4J P v _ 0 0 o m > � A f�// i i i i// i r j i i i � I iiilil,ii � � � i ';:,. � � �� � ��� ,�;��������;� n / i/ �� 1 ��-��i�iii j�j� � l�,.i!/�li�ll �°� ii / l — i� ' � l �/i��. �ifY i�� �� i �� � il/i�r�� �j � /� � i � 1 �/ �///�ii�i���� � ��ll/l��l�l./ A-/ i � i / / / / � � i � � i / ����i � ll //i/�ll il i I I�/' i i U� ll�lll � � � � I I j � I� � I / l �/ j� % /��l i I� / � � � 1 i I ,�� /�� ���/�/l�l�/li � .�__- i., � � � �� � �;���;��i�� _�, i I � i i i ��-. , ���• i � i ' � � , ii li� �/ �li � i � / � �-�-r �i i// �l � / � � i� / i _ - ' i ��i//�/��� � �� -� � . A � ii�ii� //�� � ✓ � i ///� � �- ___ \` \�� 'i�i/� /��%i % � _ / // / // / Q \ ` __-___,` � _ � / i///i / �� � � J y .i iiii � , � , a ��� � y y ___�/ //i l i� ' �"� i i ) �� Oo \ / '___i/%���% � / �� W , ,�" '----',i , � %( a � � Pe. � _ �i , � � z -.� �-_/i� . i i � � , . � � o - - � / i �\ �� i � / / W - � � - ♦ / � / � � � .`� \ i � / i � �- � � � / i i Z ; i _ ' � � � � / i / � p � �� � � 1 i i / �, �/ 1 I i� % i� i / �/ C i P� _ �' i i�ii��`�/ �/ /�"--- -__�° '� � it � . �SO_�-- , S�i�_ `Y� - /i/i i/ / / i� !;��'i i � /. �����i/ � � ��%—_______- �ji�ij i / /i.�-------_- '�/ / /� /����� ��_ /"� i;i�;' i i i ,.;;,�i ---- �\� � � j%i�ii��� i /i%i�i.,_----_ ,- \\\ �� _ �. % ����/// j / � � �/�/�//�! ___ � — — `. d ' � -'i i;'i;'.i'% ,' ' �i�i%i :' � �� ;=_===.- \Q\ I / � //�///// / � ��/�`/l�/%%�ypp Q� `1 i � %/i/ii/i �� �� ��i�� '���%�=5=_ � � s.; � '�_u / � I ti�Q � _ � �i �rj i � / �`�� �� � � . ., �� �� ` � � oi � i � � / I � i/� �1� -� � f ( 1 v/ � L . � I "- \ i�iil' ' �iW \ \� i i i I� .: � �� ��i I I:":: I � � oz 1r / III I ��W I j � I I i 1 � � il� i � i li�l i � / / i � � � � o �-�/ � � � i I .,e` i i-r1' V I � � � i � i j /� i ��I � I � i i i � I i � i i ' i � � � i � � �� I' '�� \ / :•I r 1 �� \ `. � / i I � � � �� �� � :l 1 \ � � 1 l �� / / '. \ / ��/ / i / C/ � i _ i / � � � i � i �i �r- � �4,� � i i I r !^- � � � I I � �� � iM� � I .. I � I � i %ry�ii� 1 1 � � � � I I 1 � � � � ; a 11 \` \` ; i 1 \ � �f �l \ \ ___ � 1 . d � i � 'a•_� I � 0'RB'ld'tltl'J � � 016 ~ /� i i i , i , : 0'tl6'T�'HYD _ , i �� 1 \ N I I I �i�/i///i/� / / �`i ��S!/��',__ � � ,,,,,,,,,� , , . ,;.:, _ � �� � ji/ �i%j! / i ;�� i �--'�- i I I ///���/� / / � �'� � � � ii���i� �/! ' ' .-' , �i� � � , , � �: ;'i�� %,%,, � / v- � , , i� „�, � , , o, i r��l! i�; : � I i�') // `� 9O0 - A i � u � � , i � , , , ,���� rl��i' i � i / �•�S=' � '�i���l�, l I � / /� �ji r__ i„��1� l � /�iiii �l i��llll � 1 �����iii� iiili�l i � � � . . Illl��� � 1 � � /i� � ���il�jl�' � � 1 �i���/ (l I���II I 1 � //�// il� I� I � ////� � j��III � � Ijll� i i i ���II i ��`����� i���tl I �� 1 � � i� I! I I�II ( .��I�II I II fl�l . �Ilii i II� ;I!ii i � a i i�ll Ie'li I ¢ � I ��II - --�ill�ill I � � � II�I I LL I II - - ��i�l�� � u' ZO i i��� � ��lill I � - � ���I ..jl�i�� � 1 I i��j �iil�l� I I � li i�j� i �iii�il � � 1 � il�l - . i'ii'I�II � � 1 � il�l i��i�l�ll � � 1 I �III ' '���iiiii i � � i�l�l liillll I I ��I liilili � � i��i� 1 � I 11 I I � ��� I 1�` yod I���II�1 � I �I ��I II � � � 1� �1 � � � � � � � � � � � t � �i I�I�I� � � � i � � / I I � 1 � � � I / � �� I I I �� �/ ��� � � �..� � I . I � / , i � /� i j i . i i ��� j I j� �� / // � / � � � / j i� � �i // � li�� ---- '�� ,{a�,y�.�_IcJ i � ,- , I i�l � `� `�� h:i �_ - / i / / i� I I 1��-__-``_ � �9y,,. � / / . I I �� \`'_ __�� -V_.y li / i i � I�� I r � ` _ ���__� / // / / � � � �� __ _ _ _ / / / � � \ \ � _1 � l � � � \� � ` � ��-_ - ___-_____-- i � � __ ♦ �� ��__-_____�__ ___-__' / � `�OI� ____�___��` `- /� �L J �`\_ '�-- avoa aaoa (eo� �H•1) ---- �Y— -- ------ � ----------- ----------- , ,_ , ------------------------------------- � i �� --_--"________=�os___-____'____' � i i .% iC���__ _-_ ______________________ �I 1 - _____`_ ____-____ ,� �� � i I i/ /�� j c�J �`) � � � , W i � c x > F- 2 � 0 U C � 3 � W � Z 3 } Z a f O U � 2 � J H O Q W i � s "' ¢ �a :6 r' _ a; W o W' .2 cr :Q'm♦ �.do � --------', 1a�0� M31A3`Jd�d9 3�tlHtl31 M31A1S3M ________—� —. r I i I I I I I I Sa00MiV100N�W N � M � I I I I I � I 0 ; � Y U � O aD � J � m � i(f • e w Q ; ? a 4 °0' O �,,�� g "-•`�`z--- «� avoa aaoa �sv� -�•1� 1 ! � � a J a Y C Q z s J W Q a N w � 0 x 0 s > F- S � O U O O O ¢ W � � Y z a i 0 U � 2 � J F � C W S H o � �, I d z E - � ; o �; N W J s 8 '' e : °: _ � °:_ a g . � � � � 1; ti � ; � + � � - - - -- -,-i� ; � , � � 0 �`-_--:..:-=-_��_- , ,1� � � � - - -- ' � � � i, _ � ��i i '__-'___" ,O i n ifi i ❑�❑❑;; ;;-��4'� � ii ,w� � I i � � � i i ; • I � � i � NI � � O � � i � I Z .. - I I �/ i�i� i ��i - �i ❑ I � : -'� ' 1� � F-i ?: I � � �.' '� � I � p' :: � � � � �'ll � _'�. 'p: —f_ 0 �m , / � i I I O'' ';� �N . / ' i � V• i:; ] � in �/� � � i� � C7 .i: I �y ; � ;_= Y�_ �'I �_:�; I 0 � '� ;% � ' �� ' ° =[' ;-�-----lg� ��, / •:.� �i i = �:. I ;;%; / �;� � I ' ol :; � � � u�� I � I � � ¢� _ ' , ` i � i ' ' Q ! i il acwji I �I i NI i — /�0 �� �5� a°I ' II � .. , I iY� � � I � i I�I�iE I I I I /� iJi � I � � I '� *�; I ' ii i _ �, .,�, 1 � �i_ S---t - -_lre.�� � ---- -- ---- �' �- -----�"�----:" -:i __�- s% --- "- ---- _.__._ - _ e -�"=----'=i' ;i I.�. �___'_ __'_ � � __ -t- -'�"�-i �'� .;: ____ __'____ _,___ I I' a'. � li � I � I Q L: ��� �--____'- • i li W�:S �T`.� ___" ' I I yz��° 1 r � � 0 —J � ��� • 0�� i i' .a�• .-, .m * � 9 � � m.0 � •� z• mm :mm ,e'-,a � S m 9 O � r C Z � n O � 'n Z < 'z 1 m a O 0 0 n � C a � D � v 2 O � m N r n z 0 N n D '9 m v r D N �I�� I� ���� I I �I � ��I'i � ii;i � ' Ilii i Il�i i I��i i iiii 'i �;'; �� III� Ii �� I l��'��� i i � '' � �� „ � �, � i j���� i � � / ' /i ' /i.'.' /i'� � ii � / � �i / � , ,, �%,;,�� .- � ;, � oos � ,' /� � j ,', / � � G% ' � � • . �,� ( i � � i � '� 1 I l �\ � � �i � �� l _' -`, � �� i � � � I I � 1 1 i� � 1 i 1Y � ` _9O� - / ' --- / — , I \, \ `\ \\� ----- --_- ------_ i �� �. —_---- -- ---------------' � ' .. , ��/ \.� - ----- - � � � (T.H.149) DODD ROAD -'�-__ �: � � r 1 W�.��� , �.`.�•�or!;�yr.� ;�::7�'�� f . �ri//" �� ��1 'y~ _y�l i� �� / `�!�i �; ��� ��d j �. 1�i� ��Ul�LA'�� � � � � ��� 1�� .`\i .�ii1l , ..�, �n' ' :i; ",� .� 1!'1� -����' . ... � � r ���� II''a3 d.:- �a,�. �.�� 1� • �� �� -I��!c, �� ,�"i■ d�� r�': . fl � • 1 5 ,ie:. ' tl• � � � �ti F ae��..�s� � u ����" 7�1.� � � �!` i ��bi ��ar.: - :e ;`;;; �,�: ,� ��u � :�: . � ..� i `� /r r �' �U/�i��� _i1.�'d�` . �1�/s .►''. �� � �� �� � i �1%� Z�1 d��` -, - /��. �•.:� It 9 1i�� 71 I�i.���[4 � f �'�. �I��I �. Y � .Y � � ���%� � ���I � I I � n� . ��,. '���i1 � 4 � ��•. `a��� ,__ �� 1��.` �� � a�i '� �-!`'` _ �f� -',�I � � �,�,��,r� _ �: . ` p� , �. �'� i" , � , , .;'� .. 006 � i� ���/ � / /.(1�� �ro� I � �---, /, � �\ r � � � A � � �i � � � � � � i� � 1 i i � � I j� i �� I IXv ' j � i� I �' � I� e I ' f W � % I� l�� � i � / � �� � / I ) �% �/ � � ' � , � i i / �i i ��� � � 1 / � f / I I \ \ `1 I ` � � i �� �� `, �� I ' ` �� �I i i� I � i � i 1 � i �� � � � , / i � � I i i l I i ' � / i �� ��'--� i ii ,' , i i�-� , , , ji��' �' .r ; I�i �� � i �i i� � i iV��� , �, � 9 I � � ' ,,,,, � � � � � II �i i � `\\ � , I I�, I —.�-- "- �' - - �j I WESTVIE.W�iERRACE , . �sao 1 �� -1 I \ \ \ � /�\\` \ \\ \ I � � � � i I . � � � 1/,\,,I� ; , i � � � ; -� ' � I�� I t , /, � -� � '� ', , ��, � ,, � � . i � / , � ` � -- -' ( � � � i � , . �i �,� i i;�1 . � o w F m i ----' �������% ' �:� � z ' i � � ��-- / �, 1 1 �, � � i� I u o iF_�-� i���� �% � � � � ��� �I - , // � \ ^ 1 1� ``��� � � li ; ...�,�i� �� , _--' �•� i� i � __- �'i,�i,' i i i,'� � � �%., i i // i� �- --"" ��'-'i i ' /i- i ; -__ -_��%,'i �/ ��i �/ . �i� _ _ !, � � - --,, . � . � .9 ,g � _ � / / � / 6 -- .' / / j �� �� ____ _ �� � �/ �,,,��/ � � i i i � � / � i i i, � ,� . , yrr------- � / � i%%�� � i - ,l � i / / � � � �� / � � � / � kl n � , ; ,, �; � ' o �� , , , � _ / / / � p / � � . ^\ �� � ,� /��-��� � �-i � / � / m .� , � i' /i ii /� �`i� t � s > ' � I''� i/i /o '_-_' /. .�/.. ,��_ � - /, �� �� �� N� � U /i' � ) � ; /� i � s��' � / / _ �/ �/,', � // � � � .� �/ % l�'� i � , i i i i v i I i � i � � / � / , � � ' / � i / � ? � � � • /: / - if� i � � i � �/��i � �i - �� �i � i i � � i /i � i i i i �'���r� �i�i iii i i � � � � � .I ' i � /i � � � �� j A; �� / �// i i//� / � '!� ' 1�• _:4s �Co, �� r�l��� : �* ��i� d���1 j� � ��y �1-� i 1�:� � ' �Z �. �; ;�. •` \�� �� � � ,' "J`1 ���, ' � . .n��� i �...� ��.- �\ i�.�:i�_�. -�i�` y� ���r � `�..l1 � i y �,� � 'i ,.Y.,,I_'�� i;iti'� :i;� I1� -- �; i:: 'y��.� � . �k! j1�v � �„ v � i . � ♦ � i � i�l '/ �� ��l / . � /�i i / � � '� i /� v i /� _o Irli�..� i � i �i � i � � � � � �e � I//:,! r I I � I� /; i /� i i�'• W o/ oi i � r��i i I�i r i: �/ i i . i A^ / o i . i � 3� 0 m� �m m w / •r'1 :�� � ' � "� �'w43"'-�. � i :P .?,ty s�. .,.fll. i�J_ ��`� � -�� ���'i i '., � _� �.'b » � 'J� --.� � . _.'^ : �` I . I°�(t'sfi`r�"°ryK[ _ % -��� � `��\� '' 1 � � ♦ �/�i���i ' �\��` J \\� 1 II� , � �� � �i, ,�� i�T� WOODS �\`, l��o �.''�'' � �� I I.i 'i -� )� � � o� Rc�na�aiae ; � ; � ; w - , ,I�� � i , % „i 01 ian . ;-� � � ��� � � � I ��� Sa00M �1d4N,�W '; � � � �� ; � � � �� - �, � ,�� . � � i � . � � � iq � b F ����� I ' �I�:�ii�V`�• � _ i i i n �� ��� /�l� ��.1. $ � � 1 � I ��I�' �� �.r- �� __S1L_ � � i!! ��� � ���� V i� � i� /� � / lD i� �, ��� � ��� W . 1 I� � �� � -I ' ���'� ,� // � . ,' � �� � � ��, --- - , ,'�• ,� �; � �- o ��� � �, m\� c0 'i � I `�,� � � ��i � �� � /� �� /�� � ,- �. � �� - i'i !� - l�` � � � � � ��' � s � � � , � i �i u I � , \� i ' i � s�'. �� � � � .- •p � . � I � '. � �� �� � ,� � g � � I � 1 ���' $�� _�� �_.00 � • .: � _ � 1-� `� /�/ // i �s�+ � m 'r : ,c. _ � \���—� ��/ j; i �, � �\• � ^ �� a� i �; i _�� o i � � � � � � ��m e i/j �' __ � � i ' � //' e � � � . R � ��� � � �� �� I I i , o '�°� A � � �� _._ i(� _ �j .� �,_/�i i 9pO -- � �i � � I i � i � (�� ♦ '� �� � � �� � ✓�. i�'��' � ." I �' W � I i I 'll�l �'\ 1 ; �i \ _. .o� -__ _ '/� — .-: '///,i ���..� > � ,__ I . I i � A ♦ � __ / r � � 'Y�� ___. ��// i /� S ° '/f'�` i I i , �� �_ � � ii ` i ' ', �'n � `=' ; // ; i ; '� �� , , , � �� � � , w ��—� � - �j , � , _ ; � _ _ ; ; ,; w i - _ , s � � _„ � � . \ b V � � i / f.. l � �� � I � � l� I �� � �. ��- ��V / � /�� !� . Z i 1 1 _ � - \ / i . F- / � i � _ � �� � / �� ; � N I i � I �1 b � .' �= ,� 1�i� i i i X �i ��o��i , i i �'� � ���i/ii � �i W (n � �� i � i a �� � �� i� /� i� ��� / W � � I�' i � , , � x '__ _� I ,�•� /�i / �-__"-_�" f � i� � ._ o. ` - ; -- � ' --� i i�i� i � i - - - _ i . `,\ '�-- �. � :;'�� � i i O �� �� r7 0�'� _. /��-; , m . I � i. � i / � _ '- ,'i � °a - i - ,�� ;+` i �i,/� i � __ i . � � . � , i / i i i , l(n , 'I,� � �� j� __ - � � � :,�/ i i i'------__ . `, C •' / � �. / i / / � f� W, � --�y�,��p-�- ��� - _ I � � � � ,��� ��ii.�, _ - i � �•��� �� � � � �� - "i_ o, , ii // / jii ' - _, O L1J ii -N � � � � _s� r�: ✓� i �/i/,,-__ 2 � I i l 2 I � ` � �� 1 � �/ �j/� _ ¢ � �� t %7i i / %i. _' � � '' --- � � W �, �V � / i � i / �� i � __ } CL �/ � m i���', s �%/ � A i �' / � . /��� � ' � �aoo � . Q � � / / / �� � - F„ . z ' 1 / � - i . ' � � . :��i �� �_ __ i I O � �' i I li� ; / -/ U ____�li�, Z ir- �� 1 �, ' : / �� � 'i�_ � O I � W N . � - � � � ' � � , I - i i� � / � � O � ' ���i � � 3 , � � �i� � � � i � — i� �''°� � _�•� � , ----' � �� r � / � �' �/ w Y'' 'ii� / ,' � ,�'� � � � . �� -� __ - - -' r �i � , �_ s�o � I �' �,� I '� I � ' i / --- ' � � / , � �� ��<' , 3 � � � � i � ��' i-i i �. i �, � i � ii �, �; i � % i i/�:'•: � , - i � r �� �� - i � I' '��'i r '� i � a � ' � i ,� � � � i a � I I - �; � ��i� � � � �\� � � �,� � i ii � i - a �: - �.I � / ' i/ O 1 � ' � ' / �'�� ' � � U aos � �`_ . � I` / '�I i I � / � 3�tltla3�M31AlS3M ��j , � i �i � � ' � %� j � �.� � - �.� � � � � � ' � -� - �—� �-� � � ii' � j �, � �' � �� F � .� .I �� �: ' i � i� �1 �. �` I�'il�i I ' � '. � � I i I � w � � � I i � � % . i I < W 3 2 I i 1 � z F- r % i i�l _ �� i I a I I � �� �il .1 � _ _ � � � : / ' / � �� i , � a »a � ���i�i �� 4 g ;'� a Q I Ww � �i _.9 � --- ¢ � i W< �y -�/���I � � ___ ��� i LL Z il �w ,55 / / � � I ._ I R, � . ,� o� g j= � � ' I/ ' � 'il '. I I . I � ' � ` � . � ' � �i � � � � I � �t i �iil I � �.� . � ' � l � � � � � �__-__ � �II� ' � � . 1 I I �\ I � . � � f � � 1 ' � � ����I �I'. �� .I �` �l / � � ! .i�ili�'. , ' �� . �. � � _ i" liill��� jl �I '' �� V I�il�l �I � ' ' , � ��i �`'__ - _ _ - � _ i,llii. � I � ����� n�°� / :� ♦ � `. ` �..il�i , i �I� � y / ������� n � � �.�I��I I� � � S � ' < g � � _ � • � ., il �i� ' , � � � 6 � g � j �� .� \� �` /j���� ��� � i i Z'1 � 8 a b 8 s s I i ' / ( I ( < _. � • ' I I ' ' W . u � . x o . - 3 � � �! �1 � / ' i.�' • ,° _ o� / ' i� � . . J m V 6 . , _ i 1 I �� .o' � _ � � � �. � � I � I ��' ,� i � 'r-- , �b; � � � i �, � M i ' 1; � � .� � - ��'�� � - � » � � i� ,' � a _ _ •i' i o ...,. � � � ' . i I^i I�I jo =- - ��� i � i' � � � � ' I . � i l � � �' i � � � a 1 � � 'v' 'i - � . W I i 'i 1 ' � � I IlV�___ � � .I � � �� � � __ ' � • , � � �/ I -� i � 1' � _ ' , I `_ \� ". . -_"� / � i -. : i _� � Q x / c �' -___ __' _--_. _ _ __ "� � . I � - _ _ __ '��___ �` F� _-__� -. __ .�___ .. +� - - ' \�1� V � \ _� `_�� � �-- ``` �--- _ OtlOtl 4000 (64L'H'1) --- - �` �� - - - -- - - -- -- --- -------- ---- � � i __.,\.\.....\ ' . ,___________,—s__ ___ _____ _________________ :`Y � �, \ � / � -____'-_ ___ __=.bos'___ '_'__'__' �, 1 � i 1 1� � ; �� .____- __ _'_ _____ _________ c� W6 '� � � I 1 �\ � � 1 � / C� --' W v: a 1 � I � � �� i � � � ' � � �> � � `� W v . �z C♦ . �m. ',av " Q i a z 0 U w N � � W m ae �y �� �' a'� a� e 1332�15 j I- � H z � 0 z w �:' o •�' E_ Yy � 2. 9 � y 5• o@ 33 �y g� g: eg e� F9 60 � -� :;. @P g � � � �'€ f '��=g? �: �Y }� g: � �u e fit �a� ��'=:o� . �S�v. B� dfi s�i:y b=g '� �r ei6:s° E� k�'ai� 3g 4uk�' 9�� �g o� �aE��j 3i �P�H9 " B °B �.� _ ¢ `� d: :..��3 Efrp aa� �` �9��" °� _B�:`y.'6 8 �S'°`s.L'yfr ?5 �Y��z6g$n39� �gHy�e:`s�5n " �BS'�CE d: d�•Ed5""��^.b -9SS��u6.�i� - " � Se.;._ •. I=:Pa- =s -: Fa'z;� -a;a., .:�F:���t .�,.;-r��3 �€f4a; ��33�' z3 €'s�:ass3s =-a"_.: ��syo:gs-, sio ,-? y:R�_'P}tE ,' _���'o�'"�� �_.i�E5'>� �-9YgF�p_:� gt :'�3$�ps�aygn �5;�4EY&' ��Yd�6[�ELkfi'-���=69b9'F�2fi���;�''%��2".; ����s�:���3�°_3�s':s6Y�9��bS�F��.:c.i� � ,,, , , „ , „ , , , , , \ E \1 �� � ?S / �� b� �.a / � \ �' ''�•'_ / \ a ,��'; : � \ .4.'��:t 1 / Z ..• � °o � . i Q 1�:r \ � J �-- a a; _N. "' Z a�; � r ►_ �se �; " �' w a �s ��, ? � GJ. a�� F- ', r4 � O Q , � Q Q. `' � � --�� � 7 Q o �. '• i a LL �•� . 1 _ � � � \�—�e . ��. .� drC ;'; '� E i:� €-! Y e= Y O 2 f 2 Q J a w W 6 H r ¢ O tA � W O -.� � -. t.• C e :S: _ '(I i5: : . ' e: a= 0 z � z a J a w w ¢ � 2 W W � Q 2 W > W _ C1 ti N ..! Q � W 0 w a ¢ U N c z a ..l N W i 0 S 0 ¢ i � � � O U 0 0 0 � W � z 3 �� 6 �€ 5� � �� � �g �� 4 0 �� � # � �� �� 9 � J µ ' H II � ¢ Z F W _ � S � . Q � �"' J a 'I i" �w m :� - � � . � .. � �� �• m � �::�,:'.- � m �y 1 � f �r � � $ pE. E � FE. � � t.,.: y� � 3 �I "' 6 l\ .'"t� � 1 i"f_'- / .; � � J � � � � � W > O � U � Z � � i � 2 O 4 0 z � 0 LL `; . i': i:. :i; �:i :;i ''.i . ;a:' ., . ,. .3 . .00. •�z. o,�n i: :: i3 m c P 0 z n m r s 0 z N H � s 0 0 n N N N n z m a � N a � m �9 < a r« o� � as LE�I liNn a3Nao� � �, � � : 3s E94 3B fi88 � �� u��d �ana� .+addn .o.�=.ri� ur�d �ana� uiry� Qf � �(� _ a. °g 14��-' � I �.: C•�� -»l a$e�o3S � I t i 41pfl; :�' ; L_J �II�II!�.. �':'Sw55a�d I�YLI Qi � I .E ___. . �......y� —� � � ; woo�pag �aase�y M i '��pune� � � � � ,� � � I r i �'� u� n vu i� � i. oo� \ a t ���e,�, : : : �vv�o v lS°l � i-r ,--. - � j i -q,�,�ao � �ay�1!x � ii $wwd � o � i � �� i !� 9SZ LL I � —�-.3 ji � 4+i�JWWA C7 i � _ $UTA1� O 7 m t� !� 8LL � � woo�pa8 -- I� I � I�.� I i ����� .� aSe�e� f; , ' .F3,�. r � +------- --r - �---� � � w i i P � i i �e,(;�no, o . ; I = i .� I � �� a I ��i�������� � , '�, � ., � , � 0 � � U O Y�i , ' � � .• 9�� o 0 ' n � ¢ w r z 3 > z a a 3s 60�T llNfl a0l�l3iNl � c z � J V- f 3S S'TS5 3s 848 Q ur�d �ana� aaddn .o.�=.ri� ur�d �ana� u�ey� • W ;_ .� � , i ;J �;— :' ! �a J 0 : I t. as I �. s e� 4 W I � y3Q8 : � {(�'wssa �� e a8e�o�g 3)�l d � ... �1 ' ` �: � � _ I � M; ,(�pune� d� � �% , `----- - =s � , i ... ,., �.ic� / ' - i ' r-� I-i-� .� w ¢u 7 Y� b6C '—i . / +ear �o � i i--� i �a�i�� i;'i woapag ,. � I i i �; ' 1' f i I Swwa �alseyy - ; ; I .4)R8 � � ; -1---i ,_ i i �1 I i � I .,a� �.�eo � , � _ � � I � ;:O - � ; , i� ze� � �� wwa � � $wni� � ii n sz� - �' j - woapa8 ;�€ ade�e7 _; i. :;' � � �+: T------t �(�;u � —}—�� ,`a � i ` plr.(;�no� '' � , 4, ��j ; ; 1 :3: � o T��'�'�`�' . � �,� � � � ,�r . � °_; �—. � �, ' � �: � r 1�j�f q � q �� ����'fR�roM,iy I 'o ' :� v W:: • � +zC• ♦ n � �