1990-08-21CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
BIIDGET WORRSHOP - AGENDA
AIIGIIST 21, 1990 - 6:00 P.M.
1. Call to Order.
2. Roll Call.
3. Budget/Levy Discussion.
4. Adjourn.
*��***�************�r****************��*****��r*�******�**�*****�*�
�*******��*******�x*���r***�*�r**********�**�******�**�***�**�r�r�r����r
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
AIIGIIST 21, 1990 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption
4. Approval of Minutes of July 17th and August 7th.
5. Consent Calendar
a. Approval of the August 14th Parks and Recreation
Commission Minutes.
b. Approval of Completion of Probationary Appointment -
City Hall Custodian.
c. Approval of Completion of Probationary Appointment -
Receptionist/Clerk-Typist.
d. Adoption of RESOLIITION NO. 90-52 - Resolution Approving
Final 1990 Tax Levy for Special Taxing District No. 1
Collectible in 1991.
e. Adoption of RESOLIITION NO. 90-53 - Resolution Adopting
Proposed Budget.
f. Adoption of RESOLIITION NO. 90-54 - Resolution Approving
Tentative 1990 Levy Collectible in 1991.
. g. Approval to Set a Public Hearing for Tax Levy and Budget.
� h. Approval to Purchase Turnout Gear for the Fire Department.
i. Adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 90-55 - Resolution Providing
for Public Sale of General Obligation Park Bonds of 1990. ,
j. Decline of Property Donation - Wagon Wheel Trail.
** k. Adoption of RESOLIITION NO. 90-56 - Election Judges
l. Approval of Improvements to Existing Ball Fields.
m. Approval of the List of Contractor Licenses
n. Approval of the List of Claims.
* o. Approval to Purchase Replacement Equipment Trailer for the
Public Works Department.
End of Consent Calendar
6. Public Comments
a. Solicitor Licensing - Blue Bell Ice Cream.
. HEARINGS - 7:45 P.M.
a. Big Wheel Auto Assessment Roll - RESOLIITION NO. 90-57
b. Alice Lane Assessment Roll - RESOLIITION NO. 90-58
c. Ivy Falls Creek Assessment Roll - RESOLIITION 90-59
** d. North Ivy Hills 2nd Addition Assessment Roll - RESOLIITION
90-60
. Unfinished and New Business
a. Furlong Feasibility Report RESOLIITION NO. 90-61.
b. Mel Swanson Complaint.
c. Duffy Development - Planned Unit Development.
d. 3M Building Permit.
e. Mn/DOT Storm Sewer Project.
f. Discussion on Sibley Comfort Station.
9. Council Comments
*** 10. Adjourn to Closed Session to Discuss Pending Litigation -
Suggestion to Postpone.
�.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
I��C�]
August 21, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis a r
SUBJECT: Discussion of Pending Kensington Litigation
niscIIssiorr
As part of our August 21st agenda, it was recommended that the
Council spend some time consulting with legal counsel regarding
pending litigation related to the Kensington Development. Earlier
in the week, the Mayor suggested to staff that such discussion was
premature and should be postponed. In addition, Council is
reminded that Councilmember Hartmann will not be present at this
evening�s meeting.
The City has not yet received a formal law suit regarding this
issue, although the developer has informed staff that a suit is
currently being prepared.
.�
ACTION REOIIIRED
Discussion regarding this issue could certainly be postponed
should the Council so desire. Council should decide whether such
discussion is necessary this evening, and modify the agenda as
appropriate.
MTL:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
BUDGET WORKSHOP - AGENDA
AUGUST 21, 1990 - 6:00 P.M.
1. Call to Order.
2. Roll Call.
3. Budget/Levy Discussion.
4. Adjourn.
�**�******�**�**�***�**********�*****�****��*******�*******�***��
***��******************************************************�*****
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
AUGUST 21, 1990 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order.
2. Roll Call.
3. Agenda Adoption.
4. Approval of Minutes of July 17th and August 7th.
5. Consent Calendar
a. Approval of the August 14th Parks and Recreation
Commission Minutes.
b. Approval of Completion of Probationary Appointment -
City Hall Custodian.
c. Approval of Completion of Probationary Appointment -
Receptionist/Clerk-Typist.
d. Adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 90-52 - Resolution Approving
Final 1990 Tax Levy for Special Taxing District No. 1
Collectible in 1991.
e. Adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 90-53 - Resolution Adopting
Proposed Budget.
f. Adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 90-54 - Resolution Amending
Tentative 1990 Levy Collectible in 1991.
g. Approval to Set a Public Hearing for Tax Levy and Budget.
h. Approval to Purchase Turnout Gear for the Fire Department.
i. Adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 90-55 - Resolution Providing
for Public Sale of General Obligation Park Bonds of 1990.
j. Decline of Property Donation - Wagon Wheel Trail.
k. Adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 90-56 - Election Judges
�-}� 1. Approval of Improvements to Existing Ball Fields.
m. Approval of the List of Contractor Licenses
n. Approval of the List of Claims.
End of Consent Calendar
6. Public Comments
7. HEARINGS - 7:45 P.M.
a. Big Wheel Auto Assessment Roll - RESOLUTION NO. 90-57
b. Alice Lane Assessment Roll - RESOLUTION NO. 90-58
c. Ivy Falls Creek Assessment Roll - RESOLUTION 90-59
d. North Ivy Hills 2nd Addition Assessment Roll - RESOLUTION
� 90-60
8. Unfinished and New Business
a. Furlong Feasibility Report RESOLUTION NO. 90-61.
b. Mel Swanson Complaint.
c. Duffy Development - Planned Unit Development.
d. 3M Building Permit
e. Mn/DOT Storm Sewer Project.
� f. Improvements to Existing Ball Fields.
•�+� g. Discussion on Sibley Comfort Station.
9. Council Comments.
10. Adjourn to Closed Session to Discuss Pending Litigation -
Kensington Development.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
August 21, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Admini or
SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for August 21, 1990
Two items are recommended to be added to the agenda. The
added items can be found under the consent and public comments
portions of the agenda (*). Additional information has been
submitted for two items already listed on the agenda (***). Please
note that the Election Judge Resolution, under the consent calendar
portion of the agenda, has been revised (**).
3. Agenda Adoption
It is •recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda
printed on pink paper.
5k. RESOLIITION NO. 90-56 - Election Judges
Please see the revised Resolution.
50. Approval to Purchase Replacement Equipment Trailer for the
Public Works Department.
Please see the attached memorandum from Public Works Director
Jim Danielson regarding approval to purchase a new trailer for the
Parks Department.
6a. Public Comments - Solicitor Licensina
Please see the attached memorandum from Police Chief Dennis
Delmont regarding Blue Bell Ice Cream's request for an amendment to
the Solicitor's Ordinance.
7d. HEARING - North Ivy Hills 2nd Addition Assessment Roll
•
Please see the letters of objection to the proposed
assessments.
10. Adiourn - Discussion of Pending Kensington Litigation
Please see attached memorandum regarding the pending
Kensington Litigation.
MTL:kkb
Page No. 2852
July 17, 1990
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, July 17, 1990
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the
City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers
Anderson, Blesener, and Hartmann. Councilmember Cummins had notified
the Council that he would be late.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of the
revised agenda for the meeting.
Councilmember Anderson seconded the motion.
CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of the
consent calendar for the meeting along with
authorization for execution of any necessary
documents contained therein.
a. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the
Treasurer's monthly report for June.
b. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-43,
"RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR
MENDOTA WOODS," along with approval of the
developers agreement, subject to receipt
of a plat with the street name "Ryan Road"
changed to "Arbor Court."
c. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-44,
"RESOLUTION CALLING FOR HEARING ON
ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR BIG WHEEL AUTO SITE
(IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. 3), IVY
FALLS CREEK ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87,
PROJECT NO. 2), NORTH IVY HILLS 2ND
ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO.
6), AND ALICE LANE SUBDIVISION
(IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 3)
IMPROVEMENTS," the hearings to be held on
August 21st. '
d. Approval of the list of contractor
licenses dated July 10, 1990 and attached
hereto.
Page No. 2853
July 17, 1990
e. Approval of the List of Claims dated July
17, and totalling $1,185,490.77.
f. Approval of the refund of a$1,000 house
moving escrow to Frank Fabio for the house
moving and clean up procedures for 1199
Rogers Road.
g. Acknowledgment of a petition from nine
Furlong Addition area property owners in
opposition to proposed Furlong area public
improvements.
Councilmember Anderson seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
PUBLIC COMMENTS Dr. Sol Mastbaum, 1008 James Court, and a
number of residents from Mayfield Heights and
Highland Heights were present to e�ress their
opposition to a proposal for the development
of the Weinzettel property on Highway 13.
GREEN AREA MOWING Council acknowledged a memo from Code
Enforcement Officer Dick Gill regarding the
mowing of properties.
Ms. Margie Johnson, 671 Apache, was present
for the discussion and stated that she is
concerned over the mowing of the school
property which abuts Mendota Heights Road.
She stated that she considers the growth on
the property to be a natural habitat rather
than weeds and expressed concern that the
property will be completely mowed before the
Council discusses possible exemptions on
August 7th.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the City weed
ordinance relates to a statutory program which
must be carried out and that as a land owner
the School District is responsible for cutting
noxious weeds on its property.
Administrator Lawell informed the audience
that the City staff enforces the ordinance,
which also requires the cutting of weeds of 12
inches in height as well as noxious weeds, on
a complaint basis and that the School District
has been notified to mow its property. He
further stated that Mr. Gill has temporarily
suspended the order to the School District
until after the August 7th meeting.
Councilmember
things Council
staff report o
city should be
Page No. 2854
July 17, 1990
Blesener stated that one
will discuss
n whether some
exempt.
on August
places in
of the
7th is a
the
PUBLIC COMMENTS Mrs. David Hiner, 1312 Furlong, asked whether
the City has written notice from the County
Assessor that it owns the homes it purchased
in the Furlong area. City Attorney Hart
responded that the City has recorded the deeds
and has filed a certificate of real estate
value.
Mrs. Hiner asked about City regulations on
fences.
Mr. Doug Guyer, 1309 Kendon asked what is
happening on the Furlong Addition, and further
stated that nothing has been done on capping
the wells on the City lots and that septic
pipes are exposed.
Public Works Director Danielson stated that
the feasibility study for Furlong improvements
will be ready for the August 7th meeting.
With respect to well capping, he stated that
the City has let a contract for the capping
which stipulated a date by which it must be
completed. The contractor is working with Ron
Spong from the County, who wishes to do some
specific work before the capping is done.
City staff will go to the properties to be
sure that the sewage pits are covered.
Councilmember Cummins arrived at 7:55 P.M.
VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS Fire Chief Maczko introduced Volunteer
Firefighter candidates Mark Kaufman, Roy
Kingsley, Dave Dreelan and Walter Klarkowski,
and recommended their probationary appointment
to the Department.
Councilmember Blesener moved that Mark
Kaufman, Roy Kingsley, Dave Dreelan and Walter
Klarkowski be given one year probationary
appointment as Volunteer Firefighters,
effective on August 1, 1990.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 2855
July 17, 1990
HEARING - DELTA Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the
ENVIRONMENTAL purpose of a public hearing on an application
from Delta Environmental for a conditional use
permit to construct an accessory structure at
the Mendota Heights Amoco Station to house
equipment necessary to clean up ground water
contaminated as the result of leaking
underground gas tanks.
Mr. Craig Anderson, representing Delta, stated
that the leaking problem was discovered during
excavation of the old tank. He stated that
the structure will be temporary - during the
ground water clean up process - and that he
anticipates the process will take from 3 to 8
years. Responding to a question from Mayor
Mertensotto, he stated that he is a registered
professional engineer and that he will provide
a certificate to the City that the proposed
system is adequate to take care of the
contamination.
Public Works Director Danielson informed
Council that Delta will monitor the water that
goes into the City sewer, and City staff will
have to read the Amoco water meter quarterly
and bill for sewer use at the same rate as
other industrial users. Responding to a
question from Councilmember Blesener, he
stated that there has been no contact from
McDonalds.
Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and
comments from the audience.
There being no
Councilmember
be closed.
Councilmember
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
questions or comments,
Cummins moved that the hearing
Anderson seconded the motion.
Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of
Resolution No. 90-45, "RESOLUTION APPROVING A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING AN ACCESSORY
STRUCTURE AT 2030 DODD ROAD (AMOCO STATION),"
as amended to stipulate a sewer charge rate
and method, to require that Delta notify the
City when the treatment is completed and
further to require a certification by the
professional engineer appearing on behalf of
the applicant that the system is adequate.
Councilmember Anderson seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 2856
July 17, 1990
HEARING, CASE NO. Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the
90-20, SJOHOLM purpose of a continued hearing on an
application from Mr. & Mrs. Jack Sjoholm, 1161
Delaware Avenue for a conditional use permit
for a fence. Council acknowledged a staff
report addressing a compromise plan prepared
and submitted by Mr. & Mrs. Sjoholm since the
July lOth discussion. '
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Mrs. Gretchen Sjoholm informed Council that
the fence has been moved to 52 feet from the
Delaware centerline, providing 32 feet of
green area between the street and the fence.
She stated that there are many mature trees in
this area and also voluntary growth which will
be allowed to remain. The applicants are
willing to plant 3 black hills spruce to
further shield the fence from the road. She
stated that they would also be willing to let
vines grow on the fence if Council so desires.
Mrs. Sjoholm further stated that she feels the
fence will make a difference to her family's
comfort and that their proposal does not open
the floodgates for similar fences. She
pointed out that there are many factors that
make their request unique - the fence will not
go along the whole side of the yard, it will
be 52 feet from the centerline and allows 32
feet of green space which the applicants will
be willing to populate with more trees. Also,
the roadbed is 30 inches above the grade level
of the house for about 75 feet.
Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and
comments from the audience.
There being no questions or comments,
Councilmember Hartmann moved that the hearing
be closed.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of
Resolution No. 90-46, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FENCE," on the
conditions that the fence be located inside
the pine trees, that it be no closer than 52
feet from the centerline of Delaware Avenue
and not longer than 115 feet, and that the
Sjoholms plant three 4 to 5 foot Black Hills
Page No. 2857
July 17, 1990
Spruce trees to provide additional screening
for the fence.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CASE NO. 90-21, Mr. Dan Houpt, from Kiesland, Inc., and
BATESVILLE his legal counsel and Architect Bruce Jones,
along with Jerry Harmon from M.I.S.T. were
present for continued discussion on Batesville
Casket Company's application for variance and
lot split to allow construction of a warehouse
on Lot 4 and part of Lot 3, Block 1, Northland
Plaza.
Mr. Houpt reviewed a revised plan for Council.
He stated that considerable changes have been
made to the proposed project, including
reducing the size of the structure and
considerably upgrading the landscaping,
pulling the building from I-494 and moving the
truck docks to the east side of the building.
He stated that he will be purchasing the
property and selling half of it to Batesville.
The building was originally proposed to be
30,000 square feet with a potential future
10,000 square foot expansion. He stated that
he had originally asked for a 20 foot setback
variance and is no longer requesting that
variance.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that a variance
is necessary for the proposed shared driveway
for Lots 3 and 4. Councilmember Blesener
asked about the reduction in the truck dock
blacktop and whether anything has been done
with the exterior wall as it faces the �
freeway.
Mr. Houpt responded that the blacktop area was
reduced by 20 feet. With respect to the wall,
another metal strip has been added along the
wall and the size of the wall has been
reduced, but it is still a solid wall with no
windows. Responding to a comment from Mayor
Mertensotto that the band be removed and more
planting be added, Mr. Houpt stated that they
will be planting creeping vines along the
building.
Councilmember Blesener informed the Council
that she met with the project architect to
review the plan and talked about doing
something about breaking up the mass of wall
Page No. 2858
July 17, 1990
expanse along T.H. 55. She felt that
something more creative could be done to make
the wall look more like a front exposure.
Mr. Houpt responded that he met with
Batesville representatives yesterday and=_�very..
indication now is that they would like the
upper site. They want to be in the project
but when they found out that the City d'id not
want the truck dock on the south side they
decided that the other lot is preferred
because it allows truck docks on the south.
Councilmember Cummins asked who will occupy
the building on Lot 3. Mayor Mertensotto
asked if the applicant is applying for two
building permits.
Councilmember Anderson stated that Council
thought Mr. Houpt was talking about Batesville
being on Lot 4 and asked whether he is now
saying that Batesville is being moved to the
other site and he is asking for approvals on
one or both.
Mr. Houpt responded that Batesville would like
to go to the other lot to get a southern
exposure.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that Council
approves all building permits in the
industrial area, and that the applicant will
have to make a choice as to which site the
Batesville building is proposed to be built
on.
Mr. Houpt responded that the upper lot is
preferred.
Councilmember Blesener pointed out that there
are lots of other planning considerations the
City Planner will need to address - the upper
site has an even greater exposure. She
informed the applicants that Council cannot
start deliberations on a different site
without a report from -the =-�lanne�,.
Councilmember Hartmann pointed out that the
Planning Commission has not had an opportunity
to review the new proposal.
Mr. Houpt responded that given the time factor
he has to deal with, he would ask Council to
Page No. 2859
July 17, 1990
approve the first site so he has some
approval.
Administrator Lawell stated that the building
should be tied to a specific site. The
approval must be for a specific use, not for
an owner or occupant.
Councilmember Cummins stated that the Council
looks forward to welcoming Batesville to
Mendota Heights but if they are in fact much
more inclined to occupy Lot 3, what is the
potential that there will be a more suitable
building for Lot 4.
Mr. Houpt asked Council to approve the lower
building as proposed in the Council packets .
and he will diligently work to get Batesville
to use that site.
Mayor Mertensotto suggested that Mr. Houpt
just ask for the lot split and variance for
the shared driveway and not for a building
permit.
Councilmember Anderson suggested that if
Council approves the lot split and driveway
variance and the Mr. Houpt comes back with
something that needs no variances, the Council
has lost all leverage as to what goes on the
lot. He stated that he felt the planning
considerations should be tied to something and
that he would like to know specifically what
is proposed to go on the lots. He suggested
that perhaps the lot split and variances could
be approved subject to Council reserving the
right to approval of the specific uses and
building which will go on the sites.
Mr. Houpt responded that he would be willing
to come before the Council again on that
condition, final approval of the final
proposed buildings.
Mr. Jerry Harman, from M.I.S.T., stated that
he thinks Mr. Houpt is being reasonable and
giving Council control over what he will
build. He urged Council to vote favorably on
the request. He stated that the project
approved on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 is the
soccer arena. The money M.I.S.T. hopes to
gain from the sale of Lots 3 and 4 to Kiesland
development will go a long way to helping MIST
meet its development.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 2860
July 17, 1990
Mr. Tom Owens, legal representative for
Kiesland, stated that Kiesland specifically
and expressly accepts the condition that
Council reserves the right to approve the use
and design of the buildings which may go on
the parcels, as long as it is reasonable,
conditioned upon current City standards and
rules. '
Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and
comments from the audience.
There being no questions or comments,
Councilmember Anderson moved that the hearing
be closed.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the discussion
has been that Kiesland is requesting approval
of the lot split and variance for the common
driveway and that approval would be
conditioned upon Council reserving the right
to approve the use and design and aesthetics
of the buildings to be located on each of the
parcels. He pointed out that the applicants
will have to submit a plat for the lot split
and that Council is only to take action this
evening on preliminary approval of the split -
Council would reserve the right to approve the
final survey.
Mr. Owens felt that approval of a lot split is
not required because the applicant is not
requesting a replat but rather a conveyance of
property. Mayor Mertensotto responded that
the condition for approval of the final survey
is necessary so that the survey can not be
recorded until it is approved.
Councilmember Cummins stated that Council
could approve in concept the use and the
shared driveway and the potential shift in the
lot lines of the two lots subject to approval
of the two buildings to be constructed on
them. He pointed out that the sense of the
Council appears to be that conceptually the
request is fine but that the applicant must
come back with decent looking buildings and a
specific location of the lot lines.
Councilmember Anderson pointed out that the
Public Works Director's memo indicated that
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 2861
July 17, 1990
the lot reconfiguration could be done as a
simple lot division. He felt that the issue
can be resolved in the future and that council
should not be approving a lot split without a
survey.
Councilmember Cummins moved that it is the
sense of the Council that it is prepared to
approve a shared drive and reasonable shift in
the lot line between Lots 3 and 4 subject to
review and approval by the Council of the two
building plans and building permits for
buildings to be proposed for Lots 3 and 4, and
that Council reserves final discretionary
approval of specific future plans.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the Council
has not approved the variance or lot division
by its action but has only given concept
approval.
3M BUILDING Mr. Gene Murphy, from 3M's Architectural
MODIFICATIONS Engineering Division, other 3M representatives
and Keith Smith from Ryan Construction were
present to give Council an informational
presentation on proposed exterior
modifications to the former Unisys building.
Mr. Murphy informed Council that 3M proposes
to construct a cafeteria/entry lobby/security
addition and a tower of a maximum height of 55
feet. An outdoor eating area adjacent to the
new entry is also proposed. Seven interior
truck docks would be eliminated, three docks
would be relocated to the east exterior wall
and the truck access road will be reduced,
there would be a fenced area around proposed
chiller units which would be buffered by
vegetation. The interior warehouse space
would be converted to office space and 18 new
exterior windows would be needed. He showed
Council an elevation of the proposed building
additions and informed Council that the tower
is proposed for 1991. He stated that there is
a five-year program for the modifications and
it is anticipated that the facility will house
230 to 250 employees.
Mayor Mertensotto expressed concern over the
potential compressor noise from the chillers
and the chiller location.
Page No. 2862
July 17, 1990
Councilmember Blesener asked whether the tower
could be partly underground and whether
adequate parking can be provided for the
office use. Mr. Murphy responded that it
might be possible to depress the tower and
that the existing building height is 24 feet.
He further responded that parking is adequate
now and there is space to install more parking
if needed. '
Mayor Mertensotto stated that there is a
general consensus for concern over the chiller
noise and a reluctance over the proposed tower
addition height. He suggested that if the
tower can be depressed the concern might be
resolved.
Mr. Murphy asked for Council comments with
respect to the proposed front entry/cafeteria
area.
Councilmember Blesener stated that she felt
that the proposed entry/cafeteria addition
would be a welcome addition to the site.
Mr. Murphy informed Council that he will have
an answer to the question about chiller noise
and location when he comes back to Council
with a final proposal. He asked for Council
approval to cut in the windows on the east
elevation, south elevation and north wing of
the structure before final approval of the
remodeling.
It was the Council consensus that a building
permit can be issued for the window
installation as long as the requirements of
the building code are met.
AIRPORT EXPANSION Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from
the City Administrator regarding expansion
plans at the MSP airport. In his memo,
Administrator Lawell stated that he feels the
true objective in the Minnesota Advisory
Council on Metropolitan Airport Planning
hearing process should be to convince the MAC
to undertake a collaborative planning process
with communities neighboring MSP. He
recommended that the City request a time
extension beyond January 1, 1991 to allow
public input and that the Council adopt a
proposed resolution supporting the
collaborative community planning process.
Page No. 2863
July 17, 1990
It was the consensus of Council that it is
best to support the dual track approach and
stress the equity concept (air noise).
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the City should
stress that if there are changes in the use of
the airport, expanded use, the equity issue of
noise must be addressed. Councilmember
Cummins also stressed the point that the
Council specifically opposes construction of
an additional runway north of the existing
runways. He pointed out that construction of
such a runway would severely exacerbate the
problems over Mendota Heights and would be
totally contrary to the concept of what noise
equity would be.
Administrator Lawell also suggested that the
City's testimony must take into account the
impact plans for relocation would have on
business interests in the City.
After discussion, Councilmember Cummins moved
adoption of Resolution No. 90-48, "A
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR
COLLABORATIVE COMMUNITY AIRPORT PLANNING
PROCESS," along with approval of the
recommendation contained in the City
Administrator's report and authorization for
the City Administrator to testify at the
hearing on behalf of the City.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
WATER SYSTEM STUDY Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from
the Public Works Director recommending award
of a contract to HNTB for preparation of a
Kentucky Pipe Flow Model for the city's water
distribution system. It was noted that the
maximum cost of $6,900 includes a computer
program which will become the property of the
City and eight hours of training provided to
city staff.
After discussion, Councilmember Hartmann moved
to award a contract to HNTB for preparation of
a Kentucky Pipe Flow Model for the Mendota
Heights water distribution system according to
their proposal dated June 21, 1990 for a price
not to exceed $6,900, the contract to be
Page No. 2864
July 17, 1990
funded by the Utility Enterprise Fund.
Councilmembe� Anderson seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
SOS Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works
Director Danielson regarding purchase of the
SOS Convenience Mart property, along with a
letter from the legal counsel for the owners
of SOS asking that the purchase be consummated
as soon as possible because the EPA deadline
for tank replacement is drawing near.
Mayor Mertensotto felt that discussion on the
issue is premature since there is no project
in process and it is not likely that one will
occur in the near future.
Mr. Dick Kassa, co-owner of SOS, stated that
last year there was an unsigned purchase
agreement between the SOS owners and the City
and that his attorney reviewed the agreement
and asked for some rewording. Subsequently
there was a meeting with the City Attorney and
Treasurer and all parties had agreed to
revisions. Tank removal was scheduled for
December 13th or 14th, in compliance with EPA
regulations. The agreement was since
withdrawn and he had to schedule tank removal
and replacement. Testing was done in January
and they tested fine. He stated that he must
do something with the tanks in December to
stay in compliance and due�to the age of the
tanks they must be tested annually. He stated
that his options are to replace the tanks or
to test them again before December.
Responding to a question from Mayor
Mertensotto, Mr. Kassa stated that the PCA
does not assist in the cost of removing the
tanks but will pay about 90� of the clean-up
costs if SOS stays in compliance. SOS
currently monitors the tanks daily and must
install overflow spill collectors. They would
install a monitoring system. The monitoring
system and new pumps would go along with new
tanks, and his cost varies from $40,000 to
$60,000. That cost would have to be passed
along to the City if the work occurs before
City purchase.
Mr. Kassa stated that the monitoring system
and tank and pump replacement is a business
decision. If the tanks were tested and found
Page No. 2865
July 17, 1990
to be leaking in December SOS would have to
replace them.
Councilmember Cummins stated that it is his
understanding that they do not have to be
replaced in 1990.
Councilmember Blesener stated that she thinks
the long range goal is to clean up the`
Lexington/110 corner. It has always been in
the tax increment plan to acquire the SOS
property. She felt that whether or not John
Duffy goes ahead with his proposed project the
City has a tentative agreement with SOS and
the purchase agreement price is the best price
the City will get for the property. She felt
that removal of SOS will facilitate doing
something with the corner and pointed out that
the SOS owners have been hanging on for a long
time. She stated that she would rather see
the City acquire the SOS property now and
clean up the corner rather than keeping the
owners in limbo.
Councilmember Cummins stated that he does not
like the idea of Mr. Kassa coming in and
saying he is going to spend $50,000 to $60,000
but that he is inclined to agree with
Councilmember Blesener and felt that it would
be a very good idea to purchase the property
now.
Councilmember Blesener pointed out that there
is a clean up problem on the property and if
the City cleans it the state would help.
Councilmember Anderson stated that it does not
make sense for the City to buy property
anywhere in the City unless there is something
certain in terms of immediate development. He
suggested that the City could end up waiting
10 to 20 years without development.
Mr. Kassa responded that the tank test last
year cost $3,500. This year it will probably
cost $4,000. He has to install spillage
collectors on the tank for about $2,000 at a
minimum. He stated that he has no commitment
from the City, Mr. Duffy or Mr. Curley as to
when the Duffy project would be constructed.
He felt that the best thing to do is to
install new tanks and did not want to wait
until freeze up before making the decision for
new tanks. He further stated that he will
Page No. 2866
July 17, 1990
have to do the replacement in September or
October to avoid frost but that he hates to go
ahead with the installation if there is a
possibility of the City reaching agreement.
Councilmember Anderson stated that from the
City's standpoint no commitment can be made
because none have been made to the City by a
developer. The upgrading of Highway 55'could
hold everything off for a few years. He did
not feel that the City should buy property
unless Council knows it will be developed in
the near future.
Mr. Kassa asked whether he can assume SOS
could be there for 5, 10 or 15 years.
Councilmember Anderson responded that if the
owners want to fix up the building and develop
their property they could possibly get some
assurances.
Councilmember Blesener asked whether Council
would be satisfied if SOS dresses up the site
and pointed out that it is the City's option
to buy the property and facilitate development
of the corner.
Councilmember Cummins asked what could be done
to put pressure on Mr. Duffy and Mr. Curley to
give the City a yes or no on their project.
Councilmember Blesener asked what the
expiration date is on the development plan
that has been approved.
City Attorney Hart responded that one of the
items Mr. Curley takes exception to is the
layout of the strip mall and the fact that the
corner is not being used, and also the
moratorium on the residential lots and the
zoning on Ethan Al1en. He further stated that
Mr. Curley has been convinced that if the plan
is proposed to change to that extent it would
basically be a new development plan.
Councilmember Cummins asked whether, in an
effort to accommodate SOS, it would be
appropriate for Council to take some action to
indicate that it intends to rescind approval
of what Mr. Duffy presented within 90 days if
firm action is not taken to begin the
development.
Attorney Hart responded that the parties have
not yet entered into a developers agreement,
Page No. 2867
July 17, 1990
and that he thinks it is appropriate to
indicate to Mr. Curley that SOS has come
before the Council and that the matter is
fundamental to the development.
Responding to a question from Councilmember
Blesener as to whether there is money in the
TIF for acquisition of SOS, Treasurer
Shaughnessy responded that the funding has
been available since the Curley development
was approved and has been held for this
purpose.
Councilmember Anderson suggested that staff be
directed to update and to let the developers
know that it is time to get moving or Council
will have to consider other options - the
Council needs more certainty on what is going
to happen.
Mr. Kassa stated that he wants to stay in
compliance with EPA. He suggested that if he
had an agreement for purchase and lease-back
from the City, Royal Car Service could
continue to do business and SOS might close
the tanks to stay in compliance with the EPA
and continue selling groceries until Mr. Duffy
develops or a specific date occurs.
It was Council consensus to direct staff to
contact Mr. Duffy, and place the matter on the
agenda in 30 days so that Mr. Kassa can be
given a decision as to whether the City
intends to go forward with the purchase or
not.
Councilmember Blesener suggested that Council
consider the possibility of advertising �---
somehow, asking for redevelopment proposals
for (Lexington/T.H. 110) corner if Mr. Duffy's
proposal does not transpire.
SIBLEY PARK COMFORT Council acknowledged a tabulation of bids
STATION received for the Sibley Park comfort station
and a memo from Parks Project Manager Guy
Kullander.
Administrator Lawell noted that the low bid of
$68,000 was 35% higher than what had been
anticipated and informed Council that staff
reviewed the bid results with Kodet
Architects. He recommended that the bids be
rejected and that staff be directed to work
with Kodet to revise the plan, keeping the
�
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 2868
July 17, 1990
functional items and eliminating the "frills."
He informed Council that Kodet understands
that they must design a building for $50,000.
Councilmember Cummins moved to reject all bids
and to direct staff to reevaluate the design
and bidding options with Kodet Architectural
Group and the Park and Recreation Commission.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the mot'ion.
Councilmember Anderson stated that the
concession aspect seems to be what is driving
the price up and asked how important this is.
Administrator Lawell responded that the City
has had requests from the School District and
Mend-Eagan that such a facility be provided
and that the concession is very bare bones.
CUSTODIAN Council acknowledged a memo regarding
appointment of a part-time custodian for the
Public Works and Fire Station buildings, on
the basis of 12 hours per week to be evenly
divided between the two facilities.
Councilmember Cummins moved the appointment of
Edward Vaillancourt, Jr. as part-time
custodian for the public works and fire
buildings contingent on satisfactory
completion of the routine background check and
pre-employment physical.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
APPRECIATION Councilmember Anderson moved adoption of
RESOLUTIONS Resolution No. 90-49, "A RESOLUTION OF
APPRECIATION FOR DISTINGUISHED SERVICE TO
HOWARD DAHLGREN," and Resolution No. 90-50, "A
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR DISTINGUISHED
SERVICE TO ELIZABETH WITT."
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
BUDGET WORKSHOP Council acknowledged a memo recommending that
Council schedule a budget workshop.
COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Hartmann asked for information
on the testing of tanks at the Lilydale
Standard Station. He also informed Council of
historical information available in the City's
Page No. 2869
July 17, 1990
records regarding Metropolitan Council review
of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
He also informed Council that he may be absent
from the August 21st meeting.
ADJOURN There being no further business to come before
the Council, Councilmember Cummins moved that
Ayes: 5 the meeting be adjourned. '
Nays: 0 Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:42 o'clock A.M.
Kathleen M. Swanson
� City Clerk
{ a > �
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
JULY 17, 1990
General Contractors License
Butler Housing
Ken's Roofing Company
Rem-Con, Inc.
Sandvik Construction Co., Inc.
Excavatina Licenses
Danner Landscaping
Ingram Excavating, Inc.
e
� z •
�
Page No. 2870
August,7, 1990
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, August 7, 1990
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the
City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers
Anderson, Blesener, Cummins and Hartmann.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Councilmember Anderson moved adoption of the
revised agenda for the meeting.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of the
minutes of the July 10th regular meeting with
corrections.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the
consent calendar for the meeting along with
authorization for execution of any necessary
documents contained therein.
a.
b.
c.
Acknowledgment of the minutes of the July
24th Planning Commission meeting.
Acknowledgment of the Fire Department
monthly reports for June and July.
Acknowledgment of the Code Enforcement
monthly report for July.
d. Approval of a 32 hour per week permanent
part-time status for Police Secretary
Carol Bakka on the following conditions:
that she remain available to work on her
day off if needed, without overtime, to a
maximum of 40 hours per week; that she
provide coverage during the Police
Receptionist's vacation time; that all
employment benefits and conditions be
proportionately adjusted; that the
.
Page No. 2871
August 7, 1990
arrangement be reviewed on a regular basis
to determine that the needs of the
department are met.
e. Acknowledgment of a report from the Police
Chief regarding the results of the sale of
surplus police vehicles.
f. Approval of the issuance of a two-day on-
sale 3.2 malt beverage license to St.
Peter's Church for September 15th and
16th, from 6:00 P.M. to 12:30. A.M., in
conjunction with Father Galtier Days.
g. Approval of a modified critical area site
plan for Brett Larson (Monty Girard Homes)
to allow construction of a family room and
deck addition at 985 Caren Road, along
with waiver of the Critical Area fee.
h. Acknowledgement of the proposed assessment
rolls for the following improvement
projects: Big Wheel Auto site and adjacent
areas (Improvement No 88, Project No. 3);
Alice Lane improvements (Improvement No.
89, Project No. 3); North Ivy Hills 2nd
Addition (Improvement No. 88, Project No.
6); Ivy Falls Creek Addition (Improvement
No. 87, Project No. 2).
i. Acknowledgment of a memo regarding a
proposed increase in ANII�! dues.
j. Approval of a 30 foot front yard setback
variance for Midway Sign Company (Case No.
90-29), to allow installation of a pylon
sign at 750 South Plaza Drive.
k. Approval of a front yard setback variance
at 1065 Wagon Wheel, to allow construction
of a porch addition 25 feet from the
property line along Wagon Wheel.
l. Approval of an 8 foot front yard setback
variance to allow installation of a new
directional sign at the Center Pointe
Medical Clinic and a variance to the one
sign per building requirement of the
approved Yorkton sign policy, all �
contingent upon removal of two existing
non-conforming signs.
0
m. Approval
licenses
hereto.
Page No. 2872
August 7, 1990
of the list of contractor
dated August 7, 1990 and attached
n. Approval of the list of claims dated
August 7, 1990 and totalling $413,883.85.
o. Authorization for City staff to work with
Legal System Services Corporation to
develop and establish a Flexible Benefit
Plan for City employees.
�
p. Approval of
on the Fire
Tim Oster.
permanent appointment status
Department to Tom Shields and
Councilmember Anderson seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Mel Swanson was present regarding his
concern over the potential that drainage
problems might result from construction of the
Sibley Park. He felt that the project does
not comply with the Lower Mississippi WMO
plans and will cause a greatly increased rate
of surface water runoff. Mr. Swanson stated
that a retention pond which existed on the
property has been eliminated and that City
should install more retention ponds to reduce
runoff. He expressed concern that his
property will be flooded and that the drainage
problem will be passed all the way down the
creek unless it is corrected now.
Public Works Director Danielson responded that
the engineering department has received a
letter from Mr. Swanson and has reviewed it
but does not have a written report this
evening.
Staff was directed to mail a copy of the
report to Mr. Swanson and Mr. & Mrs Donald
Bauer, 1759 Ridgewood Drive, upon its
completion.
PUBLIC CONIlKENTS Mr. Tom Fahey, 979 Caren Road, informed
Council that he and some of his neighbors have
a concern about the speed of traffic on Caren
Road and asked that the City install signs or
speed bumps. The matter was referred to the
Police Department for response. .
Page No. 2873
August 7, 1990
MENDOTA WOODS Council acknowledged a memo from Engineer
BID REJECTION Klayton Eckles recommending that the bids
received for the Mendota Woods project be
rejected and informing Council that only three
bids were received and all exceeded the
engineer's estimate.
Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of
Resolution No. 90-51, "RESOLUTION RECEIVING
AND REJECTING BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE
MENDOTA WOODS SUBDIVISION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 89,
PROJECT NO. 7)."
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
HEARING: EAGLE Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the
RIDGE APPEAL purpose of a public hearing on an appeal from
the owners of the Eagle Ridge Condominium to
two orders issued by the Fire Marshal.
Fire Marshal Paul Kaiser reviewed his memo to
Council dated July 31 regarding his issuance
of orders to install standpipes in the
building and to provide corridor protection
doors on the first floor of the building.
Fire Marshal Kaiser explained that the
corridor protection provides an escape tunnel
for occupants of the building and that three
areas of the first floor, the party room, the
exercise room and the storage/custodial area
do not have this protection. He explained
that corridor protection was a requirement of
the building code at the time the building was
constructed and is still a requirement of the
code. With respect to the standpipe matter,
he compared a standpipe to a vertical water
line with Fire Department connections at each
level of the building. He explained that
without standpipes the department would have
to drag fire hose into the building from the
roadway in order to get water to a fire scene.
He pointed out that there is very little
access to the building - there are no access
roads to two sides of the building and the
department could not get access from the front
of the building. Responding to a question
from Mayor Mertensotto, Mr. Kaiser stated that
the connection could be reduced from 2 1/2
inches to 1 1/2 inches but that the larger
size reflects a "worse-scene" scenario.
Fire Marshal Kaiser explained that corridor
protection is designed to reduce the smoke
�
�
Page No. 2874
August 7, 1990
inhalation danger and showed Council a lower
level floor plan, pointing out the areas 4
needing protection. He stated that his
concern involves the party room, exercise
room, two saunas, guest room and manager's
quarters. He informed Council that the best
way to provide protection at the least expense
is to provide self-closing devices on two
existing doors and to protect the hallway with
a fire door. Mr. Kaiser stated that the
occupancy load for this area of the building
is 59 according to the building code. He
informed Council that the orders relate to
building code issues and that he does not have
the power to grant a variance from the
building code, that any variance must be
granted by the Council, and that the building
was not constructed according to code.
Mr. Rollin Crawford was present as legal
counsel for the condominium owners at 1850 and
1860 Eagle Ridge Drive, along with several of
the condominium owners. Mr. Crawford stated
that the owners are concerned about safety and
fire protection but that they are also
concerned about circumstances surrounding the
orders. He felt that the orders which have
been issued amount to harassment, and read
excerpts from several letters from the Fire
Marshal to the Association since 1985
addressing various orders, all of which have
been complied with except the standpipe and
corridor protection orders being appealed.
Referencing portions of the letters, Mr.
Crawford stated that in one letter standpipes
were ordered, that the order was superseded in
a letter dated May 25, 1989 which stated that
the fire code did not require standpipes, and
in January of 1989 the standpipe issue was
again raised. He stated that in total 25
orders were issued and 23 have been complied
with. He further stated that the City did not
adopt a Fire Code amendment which requires
standpipes until June of 1990. He felt that
it is clear that the standpipe order which was
issued in January of 1989 is invalid because
the fire code did not require standpipes.
Mr. Crawford stated that the Uniform Fire Code
does speak, to doors on corridors but that
since the Fire Marshal missed the issue until
January, 1989, he feels it is not a life
safety issue. He stated that the technical
interpretation of the Fire Code does require
Page No. 2875
August 7, 1990
what is being ordered but that the practical
question is occupancy load. Mr. Crawford
stated that the two buildings are somewhat
separate and that in the area where each of
the buildings approach the common area there
is a fire door. All of the people in the
building have other exits and a fire door that
protects them, and egress from the building is
separate from the central (common) area. He
informed Council that the center part of the
building constitutes a caretaker unit and a
guest room which is generally vacant. The
caretaker apartment has a six foot sliding
glass door to the outside and the guest room
does not but it has a very large window that
could be used to get outside safely. He
stated that, with respect to occupancy load,
from a practical standpoint if there is a fire
in the subject portion of the building
occupants of the caretaker and guest units
would be the first people out. There is also
a center corridor available which provides a
straight corridor out to the swimming pool.
The party room is seldom used except for board
meetings and occasional small groups, and
there are two large sliding exits out to the
ground in addition to the corridor. He
suggested that if the corridor is closed with
a door, the chance of it being a corridor of
escape is unlikely. He further stated that
there is access from the exercise room to the
ground and there are two very adequate exits
in addition to the one on the corridor. He
stated that he doubts there have ever been 17
people in the exercise room at the same time.
It was his opinion that if a fire door were
installed in the corridor it would increase
the risk to whoever wanted to get out of the
building and although the order may be for
compliance with an interpretation of the code
it is not practical.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that Mr. Kaiser
has been retained by�the City as Fire Marshal
that he has all of the necessary qualifi-
cations for the position, and that as
amendments are made to the fire code he must
correlate what he finds during inspections
with what the code requires. He stated that
in the judgment of the Fire Marshal there is a
life safety factor involved and he feels there
is a hazard. He asked Mr. Crawford what costs�
area involved.
Page No. 2876
August 7, 1990
Mr. Crawford stated that the variance being
requested is based on four positions: he does
not believe the owners are technically
required to comply; he does not think the
orders are required from a safety standpoint;
he does not believe there is risk to the
inhabitants. He further stated that the
owners are interested in a stop to the
harassment and to that end the board has
indicated that they will put in the standpipes
knowing full well that they are not legally
required to do so. He stated that they feel
the fire door question in the pool area is
bogus, the door closes on the party room and
exercise room. He felt installing a fire door
would pose a risk and increase the danger to
the caretaker and guest if they had to use
that as an exit. He asked for a variance to
forget the extra fire door, which would
require framing and considerable redecorating.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that there is no
question that Council hearing is the proper
place for appeals. Council has the right to
sustain the Fire Marshal's orders or grant
variances. He further stated that the City
Attorney advises that the Council must be
careful that it is acting in good faith and
that there is the possibility that if someone
were injured after a variance was granted they
might claim the City was negligent in granting
a variance. He asked whether Mr. Crawford has
found case law.
Mr. Crawford responded that he is not aware of
any Minnesota cases and that Minnesota Statute
specifically states that a board of appeals
acting in this capacity has no liability as a
body or as individuals.
Fire Marshal Kaiser stated that he would like
to have Mr. Crawford check his records - the
letter represented as being dated January 24,
1989 was in fact prepared on January 24, 1990
and the code section that requires standpipes
was adopted in October of 1989.
Fire Chief Maczko, present for the discussion,
stated that fire codes are very complicated
and there has been no intention of harassment.
Further, he stated that when Mr. Kaiser was
appointed in 1985 he had a big task - doing
fire inspections on all 192 multi-family and
commercial buildings in the City, and that not
Page No. 2877
August 7, 1990
all problems could be caught in the initial
inspection. The initial inspections were
completed in 1987; more time was spent on
second inspections, which began in 1987. He
pointed out that the code stipulates that
standpipes either are or are not required in
buildings of certain types and that if there
are special hazards, such as not being able to
go around all sides of a building, etc., the
Fire Chief can declare a hazard. In this
case, there is access to only two sides of the
building, and he told the Fire Marshal to
consider it a special hazard. He informed
Council that Mr. Crawford's compromise offer
was first made yesterday even though he and
the Fire Marshal had made numerous telephone
attempts to arrange a meeting. City
representatives made the offer to reduce the
requirement for three fire doors to one fire
door and installation of closures on two of
the existing doors. The estimated cost of
$3,000 for the three doors compares to an
estimate of $1,000 for the single door.
Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and
comments from the audience.
Councilmember Cummins stated that the
compromise on the doors seems very reasonable
since there are numerous exits in the common
area.
Councilmember Cummins
compromise and approv
fire door order.
Councilmember Blesener
moved to adopt the
e the variance from the
seconded the motion.
Mayor Mertensotto proposed that the matter be
deferred to the next meeting and informed Mr.
Crawford that he would like Mr. Crawford to
place in writing what has been proposed and
would also like him to address the absence of
good faith provision, telling Council in
writing what he knows on the issue.
Councilmember Anderson stated that if Council
defers the matter and gets a written statement
he would also like to see the Fire Chief or
Fire Marshal come up with a written statement
of what they feel would be the minimum
standards so that Council can compare the two
statements and see what is involved. He also
stated that he has heard the term "harassment"
used a number of times this evening and
Page No. 2878
August 7, 1990
pointed out that it is impossible for Council
to equate health and safety issues to being
harassment, and that if Mr. Crawford has a
factual basis for harassment other than the
orders propounded, Council should see them.
Council cannot order the Fire Marshal to stop
making inspections.
Councilmember Cummins moved that a vote on the
main motion be tabled to the August 21st
meeting pending receipt of the memorandum from
Rollin Crawford.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
RECESS Mayor Mertensotto called a recess at 9:05 P.M.
The meeting was reconvened at 9:14 P.M.
HEARING: CASE N0. Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the
90-25, HEAVER purpose of a public hearing on an application
from Keith Heaver for a conditional use permit
for fill to create landscaped berms along the
rear lot lines of Lots 1 through 9 of Block 3,
Mendakota Estates.
Mr. Heaver explained that he originally
proposed to install a landscaped berm using
4,000 square yards of fill. The City
Engineering Department was concerned over
drainage, and he has since developed a new
proposal to make sure there is no drainage
problem, reducing the fill to 2,000 square
yards. He informed Council that 1,000 square
yards of fill was placed on the site before he
was aware a conditional use permit is
necessary.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the
Planning Commission recommended three
conditions to approval of the permit, and
asked Mr. Heaver if he accepts those
conditions.
Mr. Heaver responded that he cannot, that the
Commission recommendation was for removal of
all of the fill on the site.
Councilmember Anderson stated that the
Commission Chair did not agree with the
condition because he felt that it was an
excessive requirement. He asked Mr. Heaver to
clarify what is the problem with the existing
Page No. 2879
August 7, 1990
fill and whether it is entirely made up of
bituminous, concrete, etc.
Mr. Heaver responded that in the last two
weeks he met with City engineering staff with
respect to what is acceptable under City
ordinance and that the City Engineer had
recommended removal of any chunks of concrete
and rocks over 6 inches. After meeting with
Code Enforcement Officer Paul Berg, according
to the UBC, which is the construction code
contractors follow, any material larger than
12 inches is unacceptable. He stated that
since what he plans is a berm which will be
covered with landscaping, the code places no
standards on it.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that if Mr. Heaver
leaves all the concrete and metal in the fill
and must remove the berm at some time, Council
will have to deal with it: someone in the
future could ask how it was ever allowed. He
reminded Mr. Heaver that the project requires
a conditional use permit and the Planning
Commission has referred the application to
Council recommending that all bituminous,
concrete and metals be removed to a recycling
facility. He pointed out that there will be a
problem if Mr. Heaver does not agree to the
conditions.
Councilmember Blesener stated that the
recommendation is that all concrete and metal
be disposed of and felt that requiring
disposal of all the material is excessive,
that the berm will last forever and trees and
landscaping will be planted on it. She
further stated that as long as there is no
toxic waste or hazardous material in the fill
she would have no objection.
Councilmember Anderson asked what size of
material Mr. Heaver is willing to remove. Mr.
Heaver responded that he would be willing to
remove material 12 inches in size in
accordance with the code and further that the
fill will be covered with black dirt suitable
for plants, trees and sod.
Councilmember Anderson stated that his major
concern is that metals might stick up out of
the berm. He asked what it is about the fill
that prompted the Commission to recommend that
it be removed and not relocated within the
Page No. 2880
August 7, 1990
City. Mr. Heaver responded that he does not
know, that he talked to the County public
health department and all of the material is
acceptable according to their standards.
Councilmember Cummins pointed out that the
fill is full of bricks, rock, etc., and asked
where it came from.
Mr. Heaver responded that to the best of his
knowledge it came from an area of street
repairs on West Seventh Street and that it was
supposed to be clean fill. He stated that a
rock is clean fill, asphalt is not, according
to the public health department. The asphalt
will be removed, along with some of the larger
pieces of concrete. He further stated that he
plans to meet the requirements of the UBC.
Responding to a question from Mayor
Mertensotto, Mr. Heaver stated that the
Planning Commission recommendation would
require removal of over 100 loads of material.
He informed Council that the City engineering
staff would like to review his plan for
drainage, etc., and have him remove any large
rocks, etc.
Public Works Director Danielson stated that he
has not been involved in the matter but that
the engineering staff have taken a view
similar to Councilmember Blesener's, that
provided some of the large pieces of
objectionable material, including metal, are
removed, it would be satisfactory for back
yard berming.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder
recommended that all asphalt, bituminous,
metals and other appropriate materials be
required to be taken to a recycling facility
and that anything that has been treated with
creosote be required to be taken to a
demolition disposal facility.
Council acknowledged receipt of a letter from
Mr. and Mrs. Louis Leichter, 909 Mendakota
Court.
Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and
comments from the audience.
Mayor Mertensotto felt that the developer must
pay all city costs, and that City staff should
Page No. 2881
August 7, 1990
be directed to shut down the project if it is
not in compliance with stipulated conditions.
He suggested that Mr. Heaver submit a$500
inspection fee. Councilmember Blesener did
not support the fee requirement, pointing out
that Mr. Heaver has done much work in the City
and is a reputable builder.
There being no questions or comments,
Councilmember Blesener moved to close the
public hearing and to adopt Resolution No. 90-
52, "RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR FILL AT MENDAKOTA ESTATES," subject
to the conditions that all existing fill and
any future fill be brought into compliance
with the standards of the Uniform Building
Code, that City staff review and approve the
berm design and drainage plan, and that all
materials appropriately disposed of at a
recycling facility shall be removed to such a
facility, all with the full understanding that
City staff has the right to shut down the
project if all conditions are not adhered to.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 1 Mertensotto
HEARING: CASE NO. Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the
90-26, M.I.S.T. purpose of a public hearing on an application
from the M.I.S.T. for a conditional use permit
for participative athletics. The audience was
informed that the applicants have requested
that the hearing be continued to September
4th.
Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and
comments from the audience.
There being no questions or comments,
Councilmember Cummins moved that the hearing
be continued to 8:00 P.M. on September 4th.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
WEED CUTTING Council acknowledged a report from Code
Enforcement Officer/Weed Inspector Dick Gill
regarding weed cutting requirements and
potential exemptions from the weed ordinance.
Mayor Mertensotto informed the audience that
at the July 7th meeting Mr. and Mrs. Joseph
Nelson asked for reconsideration of the weed
cutting ordinance. He pointed out that State
Page No. 2882
August 7, 1990
Statute addresses noxious weeds and requires
their cutting. He pointed out that the issue
before Council is how to balance two
situations - natural areas providing wildlife
habitat and erosion control versus propagation
of noxious weeds. He informed the audience
that Mr. Gill has recommended that Council
authorize him to test the potential exemptions
for this season on an experimental basis to
see how the exemption program would work and
what its pitfalls might be.
Councilmember Anderson pointed out that one
problem is that what one person sees as a
natural habitat another sees as a vexation.
Mayor Mertensotto agreed, but suggested that
the suggested experiment would give Council an
opportunity to see how the two concerns can be
balanced.
Councilmember Blesener stated that Council
would like staff to pursue putting together an
amendment to the ordinance after such time as
the test is completed, and also to provide
some type of appeal process.
Mrs.�Margie Johnson stated that her only
concern about the recommendation is that when
the Council talks about a weed inspector, she
envisions someone checking weed height. She
asked if he will have specialist with him who
knows how to tell noxious weeds from other
growth. She did not want the weed inspector
to be the sole decider of what is noxious.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that Mr. Gill is
the Weed Inspector, that there will always be
people calling him with complaints about
hayfever, etc. He stated that the County has
an extension office which provides assistance.
Responding to an audience question on when
residents will be informed on the results of
the text, Mayor Mertensotto stated that Mr.
Gill will report back to Council at the end of
the year with respect to the number of
requests for exemption, etc. He informed Mrs.
Johnson that her exemption request has already
been placed on record.
Mr. Tom Fahey, 979 Caren Road, asked for an
exemption for the property bounded by Lilac
Lane, Caren Road and James Road (four City
owned lots), and Mr. John Campbell, 2348
Apache, asked for an exemption for his
Page No. 2883
August 7, 1990
� property. The requests were referred to Mr.
Gill.
A member of the audience stated that she is
the parent of two children who are asthmatic
and that they are as allergic to lawn grass as
weeds. She felt that people do not recognize
that people can react to good grass as well as
noxious weeds.
Councilmember Anderson moved to direct staff
and Code Enforcement Officer Dick Gill in
particular to perform the variance issuing
function on a case by case basis this year and
to prepare a written report to Council at the
end of the year as to the requests received
and exemptions granted, using the criteria set
forth in the memo, and further to direct a
recommended ordinance amendment after results
of the test have been determined.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Councilmember Cummins noted that the lots
which back up to Huber Drive between Apache
and Decorah will receive an exemption.
0
CASE NO. 90-28, Mr. Keith Heaver briefly reviewed his
HEAVER WETLANDS application for wetlands permits for seven
lots in the Ivy Falls Creek Addition. Mr.
Heaver informed Council that he agrees to meet
the conditions recommended by the Planning
commission.
Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of
Resolution No. 90-53, "A RESOLUTION GRANTING
WETLANDS PERMITS IN IVY FALLS CREEK ADDITION,"
subject to the conditions recommended by the
Planning Commission and that the site plan
submitted with the application be made a part
of the resolution.
Councilmember Anderson seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CASE NO. 90-21, Representatives of Kiesland Development
BATESVILLE Company, including John Houpt, Architect Bruce
Jones and Attorney Tom Owens were present for
continued discussion on applications from
Batesville Casket Company for parking lot
setback variance, lot division and building
permit.
Page No. 2884
August 7, 1990
Mr. Houpt reviewed revised plans, informing
Council that it is now proposed to build the
proposed structure on Lot 3 of Northland
Plaza. He explained that parking will be in
the front of the building, off the common
drive between Lots 3 and 4, and that the
required number of parking spaces will be
provided.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the plan
shows potential future parking and that the
loading docks are along the common area.
Councilmember Blesener asked about the height
of the berm as it relates to the grade
elevation of the truck parking area. Mr.
Houpt responded that they have tried to
maintain a berm 10 to 12 feet higher along the
T.H. 55 side than the height of the docks.
Along I-494 they propose berming to its
practical limit between the property line and
the setback line.
Councilmember Blesener stated that as she
reads the plan, there is a berm on the west
but there really is no berm directly south of
the parking area. Mr. Jones responded that
that elevation is 910 and the building floor
elevation is 894 and that they are creating
the berm from the top of the hill as far as
they can go west. He further stated that at
the very top of the hill there is no berm, but
the building is set down 12 feet, and that the
developers did not want to disturb the heavy
vegetation and trees.
Mayor Mertensotto asked whether the applicants
are still going to have the proposed
landscaping on the east and what exterior
materials area proposed.
Mr. Houpt responded that the landscaping will
be according to the proposed landscaping plan
and that the exterior material is precast
tilt-up panels with a textured finish. They
have changed the exterior by facing the docks
south and the architect has added an
articulation with banding over the docks to
make it a more interesting elevation. He
added that the applicants feel that the
proposed berm will significantly screen the
truck area of the building.
Page No. 2885
August 7, 1990
Councilmember Blesener stated that she would
like the City to have more control and
discretion on exterior materials used in the
industrial districts but that the Zoning
Ordinance is not set up that way and Council
has little latitude to upgrade the exterior of
the building. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out
to the applicants that landscaping will be
very important.
Mr. Houpt stated that they will do an
excellent job of landscaping, and that if the
project is approved construction will start
this fall.
Councilmember Blesener moved approval of 10
foot parking lot setback variances for Lots 3
and 4, Northland Plaza and approval of a lot
division subject to the completion of a
Certificate of Survey accurately identifying
the new lot boundary and authorization for
staff to issue the building permit for the
Batesville Casket Company facility.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
WILLOW SPRINGS, Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works
RIGHT-OF-WAY Director Danielson regarding a request from
Dr. David Rischall, 610 Callahan Place, that
the City release 60 by 105 feet of right-of-
way located at the northeast corner of his
property, Lot 35, Willow Springs Addition.
Dr. Rischall, present for the discussion,
stated that he would like to sell his home and
was not originally aware that they did not own
the subject property. He stated that the
right-of-way is in front of the house, right
at the driveway.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he is always
cautious about declaring City-owned property
to be excess because every time the City
releases property and finds that easements are
needed in the future, the City must pay for
the easements. He pointed out that staff has
recommended retaining easterly 40 feet of the
right-of-way.
Councilmember Blesener asked Dr. Rischall to
react to the staff recommendation that he
compensate the City at the rate of 75 cents
per square foot.
Page No. 2886
August 7, 1990
Dr. Rischall responded that he feels there is
really a difference between this property and
the property on the west side of the lot
because there is a real City need for the
property it purchased on the west side. He
stated that he has maintained the property and
if it is released to him it will go back on
the tax rolls. He further stated that he
feels 75 cents per square foot is excessive.
In response to a Council comment that the City
paid $1.50 per square foot for a recent
easement purchase, Dr. Rischall stated that
the easement negotiation involved both he and
his neighbor and that the neighbor negotiated
the price.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he is also
concerned that there is a 70 foot slope
easement which Dr. Rischall has requested and
for which a vacation hearing is scheduled on
September 4th, and that a portion of the area
requested for release is within the slope
easement area. Public Works Director
Danielson confirmed that a portion of the
slope easement area is included within the
requested 6,780 square foot right-of-way
release area but that the portion within the
slope easement would remain in place.
Mayor Mertensotto suggested that the matter be
tabled to allow Council an opportunity to
consider the request at the time of the public
hearing on the slope easement vacation
request.
Councilmember Anderson moved to
on the request for right-of-way
September 4th.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
table action
release to
the motion.
CASE NO. 90-03, Council acknowledged a memo from the Public
CENTEX Works Director and Administrative Assistant
regarding the Centex planning applications
along with a letter from Centex regarding
changes to the proposed Kensington PUD made
since the July 10th Council discussion on the
matter. Dick Putnam, from Tandem Development,
Tom Boyce and Kevin Clark from Centex, and
their legal representative, John Bannigan,
were present for the discussion.
Page No. 2887
August 7, 1990
Mayor Mertensotto informed the audience that a
number of concerns were raised by Council at
the last discussion and that the letter from
Centex lists changes made in response to the
concerns. Mayor Mertensotto read the letter
for the audience. He also stated that some
reference has been made to him with respect to
the exterior stairways, and asked for a
response.
Councilmember Cummins stated that the
stairways are not required in other
communities where Centex has built similar
structures but that the City's Code
Enforcement staff have strictly interpreted
the code. He felt that the exterior stairs
are extremely unattractive on the existing
townhomes in Kensington, and stated that the
developer agrees. He informed Council and the
audience that he has toured the Devonwood
development in Bloomington and feels that they
have a far more attractive deck and porch area
without the stairways. He felt that it is the
case of very stringent code enforcement on the
part of the City's building inspectors to
require the stairways but that it is beyond
the control of the developers to eliminate the
stairways. He stated that one of the adverse
impacts of the stairways is that the developer
has had to eliminate walkout lots or walkout
units in some townhomes or manor homes. He
felt that creating walkouts would add value to
several of the units and that Council should
work with staff to try to address the concern,
with respect both to the existing project and
the proposed project. He stated that if it is
not a matter of a too-stringent application of
the code there may be some other options, such
as redesigning the buildings to incorporate
internal stairways.
Mr. Bannigan stated that the only thing the
applicants want to do this evening is to
respond to the questions of parking and
quality. He further stated that the
applicants feel they have addressed those
issues and would like to proceed.
Councilmember Blesener informed Council that
all of her concerns about parking have been
addressed - the 39 additional garages and
reorientation of the driveways and
reconfiguration of some of the parking.
0
Page No. 2888
August 7, 1990
Mr. Putnam informed Council that the number of
units are the same as proposed at the last
meeting.
Mayor Mertensotto asked Councilmember Cummins
if he has had an opportunity to address all of
his questions on quality.
Councilmember Cummins responded that he has,
and stated that he has raised a number of
quality issues and the developers have dealt
with all of them. He further stated that he
has had only one phone call from the residents
who had concerns with the project, but that
with what he was able to generate through
touring other Centex facilities and those in
Kensington, his questions have been answered.
Mayor Mertensotto asked if any members of the
audience wished to speak.
Ms. Carol Bjorklund, 2506 Concord Way, stated
that she lives in the Kensington development
and that she was present to inform the Council
of some of the problems of quality and
workmanship she has observed since she moved
into her home. She described a number of
problems, including water leaks, missing roof
shingles, difference in room sizes between the
floor plan and the constructed unit,
insufficient space for the dishwasher,
footings missing under the outside stairway,
and installation of carpeting six weeks before
closing and before sheetrocking, ceiling
spraying and other interior finishing was
completed. She stated that she constantly had
to put pressure on Centex to make corrections
and that although Centex ultimately rectified
the problems, she believes that if she had not
put pressure on them and if her father and
brothers, who are builders, had not put
pressure on Centex, they would have taken
their time fixing the problems or might not
have fixed them. She stated that she wanted
Council to be aware of the construction
problems and that the quality of the work
needs to be looked at as far as other projects
which might be built in the future.
Ms. Cathy Connolly, legal representative for
neighborhood residents, stated that she wanted
to comment regarding Councilmember Cummins'
remark that he only had one phone call
�
Page No. 2889
August 7, 1990
development. She stated that for the record,
residents of Centex homes have come to the
microphone many times over the last several
months to voice their concerns and raised the
issue of the quality of their homes in
Hampshire.
Councilmember Cummins responded that most of
the people he has talked to who live in
Hampshire Estates have said that they are very
satisfied with the quality of their homes and
that they are most concerned about the
density. The one phone call he received was
from someone thanking him for raising the
issues, who told him they were very satisfied
with their home and were not terribly
concerned about the quality issue.
Ms. Connolly responded that she thinks if the
record is examined Council would find quite a
number of people raised issues with the
quality oP their homes in Hampshire Estates.
With respect to the Centex letter, she asked
if all of the 39 additional garage spaces are
formerly blacktopped spaces or if they have
been added.
Mr. Putnam stated that they are new.
Ms. Connolly asked if there has been a
redistribution or shift of any of the
buildings or garages and stated that she
imagines that this would add 11 feet to some
of the existing garages and that there was not
enough room as it was. To add 39 more garage
spaces would mean there has to be some
redistribution. She asked whether
calculations have been done to make certain
that the setbacks that everyone labored so
long to ensure were maintained between the
garages and the buildings vr whether the
garage spaces were just slipped in without
doing setback calculations.
Mr. Putnam responded that in many cases were
there was a two-car garage, for example, one
additional space has been added to create a
three-car garage, in some cases where there
was a single car garage there is now proposed
a two-car garage, in some cases where there
was no garage, a garage has been added. He
reviewed the proposed plan showing where the
changes were made. He stated that there has
always been a 30 foot setback for the
Page No. 2890
August 7, 1990
buildings from the right-of-way, there were
instances where a garage was more than or less
than 20 feet from a building, and the same
standards were used in adding garage spaces
that were used in the first place. He stated
that where they have been reconfigured, it was
at the request of the City to make it work
better and to add garage spaces.
Ms. Connolly stated that the neighbors
appreciate the value the additional garage
spaces have added to the development overall
but expressed concern about the fact that the
project was congested to begin with. At
Council's advise it was "loosened up", which
was a wonderful effort, but she was concerned
that because of adding 39 garage spaces some
of the earlier effort has been lost. She
asked a for a clarification of the
neighborhood's understanding that the
continuance of the discussion to this evening
was that there would be quality standards
proposed. She stated that the neighbors
appreciate the effort regarding their concerns
but felt that the Centex letter is sketchy and
perhaps just a gesture towards any kind of
quality assurance plan. She did not feel that
it addresses the neighborhood concerns about
Centex' past performance in Mendota Heights
and that Ms. Bjorklund's statements are
exemplary of those concerns. She stated that
the eighth point in the letter provides some
comfort provided the City has someone with the
forcefulness and background of Ms. Bjorklund
who will assure that when the new property
owners come in they will not be met with pre-
existing conditions that will be passed on to
subsequent owners, thereby devaluing the
development.
Ms. Bjorklund described garage problems to the
Council, and informed Council that Centex is
making it an extra expense to a homeowner to
have two garages side by side.
Mr. Thomas Smith stated that quality is an
issue but there is another cause for concern
that has not been raised which should be
considered. He cited an article in New Yorker
Magazine regarding a possible correlation
between living in close proximity to power
lines and the incidence of brain tumors. He
stated that the studies done date back over
two decades and that one conclusion from one
Page No. 2891
August 7, 1990
study states that exposure to low energy
fields such as those emanating from power
lines affect the part of the immune system
which is responsible for killing cancer
promoting cells. He stated that there are
substations and high current wires already
situated dangerously close to proposed units
and that they will have to be relocated or
rerouted, or if necessary buried in a fashion
to prevent hazardous magnetic field emissions.
He further stated that there are at least 16
units located within 100 feet of the power
lines and that he hardly needs to point out
that the exposure is a direct consequence of
the developer's intent to build high density
development rather than lower density. He
suggested that as a matter of public
responsibility and public interest Council
should work with the developer to have
magnetic field strength readings taken along
the lines and the areas where units will be
located in close proximity to the lines. He
further felt that the Council should possibly
insist that the developer indemnify the City
from future litigation which may arise in
health problems shown to occur where people
are asked to live in close proximity to power
lines. He felt that this is another
indication of the quality problem that the
development presents. He stated that although
k he agrees with the right of`�councilmembers to
change their position on the�c�.iality issue and
reach some satisfaction, he cannot see why any
of the Council could be satisfied with the
development.
Mr. James Losleben, 815 Hazel Court, stated
that the project does not benefit the City
other than to drive up the cost of services.
He presented the Council with a copy of a new
article from City Business Magazine regarding
zoning problems in the City of Eagan and the
increase in police statistics for apartments
as compared to single family units.
Referencing historical information regarding
the original Comprehensive Plan, he stated
that as he interprets the Metropolitan Council
review, there is no law requiring the Council
to rezone the property.
Mr. Ultan Duggan, 2331 Copperfield Drive,
asked Council to consider the concessions that
have been made step by step that should have
been done by Centex initially. He stated that
Page No. 2892
August 7, 1990
as an example, there is a
plans showing which trees
and which will stay - and
done. He stated that the
constantly had to challenc
do things, and should not
He stated there are no dr�
showing the concessions, �
can vote on the requests G
drawings. He further stat
Bj orklund came before Cour
things which were not done
timelv manner and asked wY
requirement for tree
are to be removed
this has never been
neighbors have
e the developers to
have had to do so.
wings or designs
nd asked how Council
ithout seeing
ed that Ms.
cil to tell them
in a safe and
o will be the
Bjorklund who inspects each of the proposed
units for the new residents and who will
protect their interests. He asked what the
feeling of those people will be when they come
to live in the community, what will their
regard be for the Council and others if they
do not protect their interest. He stated that
Council is not looking at designs and not
providing new citizens of Mendota Heights with
Bjorklunds to look at their concerns, but that
Council should keep these issues in the back
of their minds when they vote.
Mayor Mertensotto informed the audience that
before the Council this evening are rezoning
of the property from R-1, R-1A and R-1B to MR-
PUD and HR-PUD. He explained that Planned
Unit Development (PUD) is a planning tool,
issued as a conditional use permit, which
allows variations from the strict rules of a
zoning district, and that the density for the
total number of allowable units is calculated
for the total land within the development
area. Rezoning and PUD's must receive a 4/5
vote of the Council. He also stated that the
applicants are requesting preliminary plat and
wetlands permit approvals, and described the
permits being requested. The conditional use
permit for planned unit development would
stipulate that the development must be built
subject to all of the terms and conditions
stipulated by the City. The developer's
agreement would embody all of the conditions,
including the amount of land the developer is
to donate to the City park system and would
cover such things as the eight items in the
letter received from Centex this evening and a
myriad of other items, like the specifications
for the structure and list of building
materials, etc., quality items and setbacks.
The final plan would show which streets are
Page No. 2893
August 7, 1990
public and which are private as well as the
park area.
Mayor Mertensotto asked Mr. Putnam whether it
is a condition that the play fields be
lighted.
Mr. Putnam stated that it is not his
requirement, although it may be a City
requirement. Councilmember Blesener stated
that the matter has been discussed and that
lighting is not a condition made by either
party but that the developer had stated a
preference long ago that the fields not be
lighted.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the question is
open and could be addressed in the developer's
agreement.
Councilmember Blesener moved that the area of
the Kensington project be rezoned to MR-PUD
and HR-PUD consistent with the Comprehensive
Guide Plan.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Councilmember Hartmann asked City Attorney
Hart whether, if the development meets all of
the requirements of a PUD it is incumbent on
Council to rezone the property to the
Comprehensive Plan designation.
Attorney Hart responded that the question is
whether the plan meets all of the PUD
requirements. He explained the Council's two
levels of discretion, legislative and quasi-
judicial and that the City exercised its
legislative discretion in 1985 when it adopted
the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. He further
stated that case law indicates that the City's
failure to rezone in a manner consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan when faced with an
application to do so is a violation of the
City's level of discretion on the decision,
and that if Council decision were to deny the
rezoning they would need a rational basis
relating to the standards of the PUD Ordinance
or relating to the public health, safety or
welfare backed up by factual evidence.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the statute
also states that if there is a conflict
between zoning and the Comprehensive Plan, the
zoning supersedes the Plan.
Ayes: 3 Blesener
Hartmann
Anderson
Nays: 1 Mertensotto
Pass: 1 Cummins
Page No. 2894
August 7, 1990
Attorney Hart indicated that the key is that
the City cannot act in a manner inconsistent
with the Comprehensive Plan, it cannot take
affirmative action which is inconsistent with
the Comprehensive Plan unless substantiated
with factual evidence.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he thinks that
the additional units would be burdensome for
the area, it would add much traffic into
Mendota Heights, and the City already knows
the traffic problems created by the Northwest
Airlines campus in Eagan. The additional
homes in the area would compound the problems.
He stated that he also thinks it is improper
to add this many units under the flight path,
and that although it migh"t be stated from a
planning standpoint that owners of the units
would stay inside more than owners of single
family home, he does not feel this is true and
that people try to enjoy time outside as much
as possible. He felt that regardless of noise
attenuation in the units Council would be
subjecting the homeowners to air noise. He
further stated that putting that many units in
the area would be totally inconsistent with
the character of the City: the City has always
maintained 15,000 square foot spacing for
residential lots and there is a minimum number
of multi-family units in the community. He
pointed out that multi-family has not been the
pattern of development of the City, but that
all of a sudden it is proposed that 13% of the
land increase the population by 10%.
Mayor Mertensotto called for a vote on the
motion.
��
The motion%for lack of the required four-
fifths affirmative vote.
BUDGET WORKSHOP It was the consensus of the Council to conduct
a budget workshop on August 21st at 6:00 P.M.
ADJOURN There being no further business to come before
the Council, Councilmember Hartmann moved that
the meeting be adjourned.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Page No. 2895
August 7, 1990
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:30 o'clock P.M.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
AUGUST 7, 1990
General Contractors Licenses
Damont Designers & Builders, Inc.
Garlock French Roofing
Greger Construction, Inc.
John-David Contracting, Inc.
Nahring Construction
Welter & Blaylock, Inc.
Nahring Construction
Excavatinct Licenses
D & M Excavating
Erwin Montgomery Construction Co.
PlasterfStucco Licenses
Brisson Stucco & Plaster Inc.
Masonrv Licenses
� Ron Freimuth Suburban Masonry, Inc.
Heatina & Air Conditionina Licenses
Conway Mechanical
Erickson Plumbing, Heating & Cooling
Palmer Service
Gas Piping Licenses
Conway Mechanical
Erickson Plu7nbing, Heating & Cooling
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COIINTY
PARRB AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINIITES
AIIGIIST 14� 1990
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and
Recreation Commission was held on Tuesday August 14, 1990 in the
City Hall Conference Room, 1101 Victoria Curve. Vice Chair Vicki
Katz called the meeting to order at 7:15 o'clock p.m. The
following members were present: Hunter, Katz, Lundeen and Spicer.
Damberg, Huber and Kleinglass were excused. Staff inembers present
were Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander, Parks Leadperson Terry
Blum and Administrative Assistant Batchelder.
APPROVAL OF
MINIITES
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
TROPHY
Commissioner Spicer moved approval of the June 12,
1990 Parks and Recreation minutes. Commissioner
Lundeen seconded.
Commissioner Spicer presented the trophy that the
Mend-Eagan Under 12 Traveling Baseball Team won
when they placed fourth in the National Tournament
held earlier in the month in Des Moines, Iowa.
Commissioner Spicer also stated that the team was
awarded with a banner from the nationals that they
could hang on the back�top at the Civic Center
field.
Commissioner Lundeen suggested that the Mayor and
City Council should honor the team at a Council
meeting with a trophy presentation. The Commission
recommended that this be placed on an appropriate
future Council agenda and that they would attend.
MAYFIELD HEIGHTB
TRAIL REQIIEST
The Commission briefly discussed a request by
petition from 27 Mendota Heights residents in the
Mayfield Heights area for the City to add a link to
their neighborhood as part of the Trail project in
the 1989 referendum. Parks Project Manager Guy
Kullander stated that engineering staff had done a
rough cost estimate for a link to Douglas Road that
is $6,000 to $10,000. Kullander stated that the
City has a sewer easement from Mayfield Heights
Road to Douglas Road, but that it may be difficult
to acquire trail easements from the adjoining
property owners. Kullander stated that the other
constraints are steep slopes and poor soi:ls next to
our holding pond, which he stated was swampy.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated that
staff could investigate the feasibility of a trail
link here, or other options for Mayfield Heights,
and consider it as an addition to the 1991 project
for trails construction. He stated that when City
Council considers the trail project for bid
advertisement for 1991 they could consider adding
this trail segment to the referendum.
Vice Chair Katz opened the floor to the petitioners
present to discuss the proposed trail addition.
There were sixteen residents to present •their
petition. Ms. Judith Phillips spoke for the
residents and stated that Mayfield Heights is a
combination of new and old Mendota Heights
residents, many with children or grandchildren who
desire access to the new parks facilities without
having to use Highway 13 for bike or pedestrian
travel. Ms. Phillips stated that there used to be
a pathway to Douglas that was eliminated when the
last lot was developed. She stated_that since that
homeowner has installed landscaping, the residents
stopped using the path out of respect for the
homeowner and that the pathway has grown wild. She
stated that Hwy. 13 is the only access and that it
is a very busy road as a result of the business
uses along it. She listed the different business
uses along Hwy. 13. She stated the neighborhood
was confined to vehicle access. She stated her
concerns for safety and that she desired to be put
into the parks like the rest of the community.
Another resident mentioned the Shiely gravel pit
had lots of traffic with large trucks and that this
was no place for children on bicycles. Another
resident stated that the old pathway was there in
1961 and was used for years and inquired if this
gave their neighborhood easement rights.
Commissioner Spicer stated that he felt the
resident was referring to prescriptive rights and
that it was not applicable to this case.
Commissioner Spicer stated that he was not adverse
to exploring the feasibility of adding this trail
segment to the referendum improvements. He stated
he sympathized with the neighborhoods concerns,
however, he felt the Commission needed more
information, particularly the availability of trail
easements from the adjoining property owners and
the cost of construction, given the slope and soil
concerns.
C y
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
TErlrris counT
RESERVATION
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Spicer moved to direct staff to
investigate the feasibility of this trail section
and to consider it for the 1991 trail improvement
program. Commissioner Lundeen seconded the motion.
A resident stated that the trail did not have to be
bituminous if the extra cost was going to kill
doing the segment at all. Parks Project Manager
Kullander stated that for erosion purposes it would
be bituminous, however, staff would also be
exploring other access alternatives. He stated
that Victoria Trail was going to be rerouted and
Highway 13 widened and that may provide other
alternatives.
The Parks and Recreation Commission considered a
request from the Convent of the Visitation School
to reserve the Friendly Hills and Rogers Lake
tennis courts for the fall tennis season practice
schedule. The request was to reserve the courts
from 3 to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday from August
13 until October 12.
Commissioner Lundeen stated that this was similar
to St. Thomas Academy's request in the Spring and
that it should be granted. He inquired if it was
necessary to have signs made and posted for the
reservation. Kullander stated that the St. Thomas
signs had cost the City $170 and that this expense
was a burden for the City or for Visitation if they
were to pay it. Batchelder stated that the Convent
of the Visitation desired only letters from the
City that their coaches could use that designate
the reserved times.
Commissioner Spicer moved to approve the requested
court reservations and direct staff to prepare the
letters of reservation and that the City consider
signage should there be complaints or problems with
the use of the courts. Commissioner Lundeen
seconded the motion.
PARR PLACE
HOMEOWNERS
PLAYGROIIND
LIABILITY
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
BIIDGET REVIEW
Commissioner Spicer stated that he had been asked
to speak for the Park Place Homeowners Association
regarding the liability insurance for their tot lot
in Park Place. He stated that the developers had
paid the liability insurance for the tot lot play
equipment until it was dedicated to the
Association. Spicer stated that the tot lot play
equipment is at the head of a public trail and
appears to be a public tot lot and that people from
all over the City use it. He stated it would be in
the best interest of the City to insure it against
a lawsuit, as in any case the City would be sued
also. He stated there is exposure to the City
because of the way it sits near the public access.
He proposed that the City insure it or that the
Homeowners pay the premiums as a rider on the
City's policy.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated that the
City's risk manager would have to determine if the
play equipment had been built to industry safety
standards and would have to control the maintenance
and supervision. Batchelder stated the City's park
policies discouraged tot lots and emphasized larger
neighborhood parks. He stated that to meet
liability standards there was a chance that the
play equipment might have to be reconstructed, or
even removed.
Commissioner Spicer requested that the City explore
how much the insurance would cost, what would it
cost to bring the play equipment up to standards,
and the feasibility of an agreement for the
association to be named as an additionally insured
to the City's liability insurance policy. He
stated that at this point we are both uninsured and
both have exposure.
Commissioner Lundeen moved that staff evaluate the
questions raised and report back to the Parks and
Recreation Commission. Commissioner Spicer
seconded the motion.
The Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the
City Administrator's proposed 1991 Parks and
Recreation• budget and the Special Parks Fund
budget. The Commission discussed the Sibley Park
Maintenance agreement and the new $15,000 line item
in the budget for the City to meet its obligation
for maintenance of the new facility. Parks Project
Manager Kullander stated the contract requires the
City to pay half the costs, that all the monies
budgeted might not be spent.
The Parks and Recreation Commission discussed the
Recreation Contingency line item and what items are '
currently being paid for from this line item. •
Batchelder stated that this line item funded T-Ball �
subsidies, the After School Program in 1990, �
umpires and staff time for Men's Softball. He .
stated that the School District was going to .
provide an evaluation of the After School Program '
which was a first time item in 1990.
Vice Chair Katz stated that the City should have
staff to coordinate recreation programs and that
with all the new parks and facilities the City
should be considering recreation program options.
Commissioner Spicer suggested that staff
investigate the need for recreation programs and
staffing. The Commission was of a consensus that
staff begin exploring this for future commission
consideration. The Commission felt that City �
Council should be aware of potential recreation .
needs during the budget process.
Parks Leadperson Terry Blum discussed the
mainte�ance items in the budget, the seasonal �
staffing for the parks and the capital requests.
Kullander stated that $19,302 was coming out of the ��
Special Parks Fund for the Somerset trail bridge
that the Parks Commission approved in 1988. f�
IVY HILL HOCREY RINR
Parks Leadperson Terry Blum stated that he would
like to remove the hockey rink at Ivy Hills Park
because it is not possible to maintain the ice in
its location. He stated that a bigger general ice
surface could then be maintained and that nets
could be put out for use. Blum stated that the
rink faces east/west and that the sun reflects off
the north boards and melts the ice. He stated it
is mid January before frost can be maintained at
this hockey rink and that the melting ice cause ice
boils elsewhere on the rink. Blum stated that the
general soil situation in the area is bad for
maintaining safe ice in the hockey rink and that�'
the boards are constantly heaving. f
\ �
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
BALLFIELD SITES
Commissioner Spicer stated that the Mend-Eagan
hockey association does not use Ivy Hills Park.
Blum stated the boards would be saved and could be
used to maintain the other rinks. He stated the
general skating could be made bigger and without
the boards the ice could be of a higher quality.
He stated the lights made this a nice general
skating rink, the biggest in the City.
Commissioner Lundeen stated that he would like to
see the boards kept so that if there were numerous
complaints, or increased demand, that the hockey
rink could be put back next year.
Commissioner Spicer moved to recommend that staff
remove the hockey rink at Ivy Hills Park and retain
the boards should the citizens or City want it
back. Commissioner Hunter seconded the motion.
The Commission discussed the recent rezoning denial
of Centex's proposed Kensington PUD and the park
dedication that would have supported the athletic
fields proposed in the referendum. The Commission
also discussed C.G. Rein's recent approach to the
City to move forward with their 106 unit apartment
complex at Mendakota where negotiations were
occurring concerning ballfield acquisitions. The
Commission asked staff to investigate, with bond
counsel, if referendum monies on the proposed
Kensington Park could be spent elsewhere. The
Commission also discussed a process for revisiting
the discovery of third ballfield sites as a part of
the referendum.
IMPROVEMENTS TO
EXISTING BALLFIELDS
Parks Project Manager Kullander presented a
proposal for improvements to existing ballfields at
Friendly Hills Park, Wentworth Park, Marie Park,
Valley Park and Ivy Hills Park. He stated that
referendum funds totaling $63,960 were allocated
for improvements to the existing ballfields at
these parks. He stated that City crews have been
leveling, grading and preparing fields for
additional improvements, as well as installing a
storm sewer at Friendly Hills Park to level the
outfield.
Kullander stated that there would be three
contracts •let for these improvements - one for
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
UPDATES
THANR YOUS
fencing, one for concrete and one for benches.
Vice Chair Katz questioned the need for outfield
fencing at Marie Park and Valley Park. Kullander
stated that the Citizens Review Committee had
desired a barrier to stop balls from going into the
ponds and that the City's risk manager would only
allow for six foot fencing as a barrier. Vice
Chair Katz stated that she would prefer an open
park and open ballfields. The Commission felt that
aesthetics were more important than keeping balls
out of the park. Commissioner Spicer stated that
Valley Park is beautiful and doesn't need a fence
in the outfield. Kullander stated that the
outfield fencing at Marie and Valley parks could be
removed from the contract and be put on hold. He
stated that the fencing could be bid out at any
time in the future.
Commissioner Spicer moved to recommend that City
Council authorize staff to solicit bids for the
existing ballfield improvements, with the exception
of outfield fences in Valley Park and Marie Park.
Commissioner Hunter seconded the motion.
Parks Project Manager Kullander provided updates on
the park construction for Sibley, the Comfort
Station bids, the trail construction, Victoria Park
construction, tree planting, the landscaping around
the park signs, the Victoria/Celia trail, the play
equipment punch list, etc.
Kullander stated that he has been observing heavy
use of the play equipment. Commissioner Lundeen
stated the children love the new equipment.
Kullander stated that he would appreciate any
comments about how the parks are being used so that
the City can consider refining the amenities, such
as a new swing or a horseshoe pit or other items.
The Commission briefly discussed the Par 3 golf
course and was of a consensus that this remain a
golf course or an open space. They felt the City
should not let it be developed even if it meant the
City running the golf course.
The Parks Commission acknowledged a thank you from
Mary Louise-Cleary for the play equipment in ivy
Hills Park and a thank you from Dick Spicer for the
wonderful job Terry Blum and crew did to maintain
,
\
ADJOIIRN
the ballfields for Little League play this summer.
There being no further business, the meeting was
adjourned at 9:25 o'clock p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 16, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council, City AdminisE���'�1`
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Completion of Probationary Appointment, Lambert Derks
INTRODUCTION
Lambert Derks' one-year probationary period as part-time
Custodian expired on June 25th. In accordance with the
provisions of the personnel code, albeit late, I submit the
following appraisal of Lambert's performance and recommendation
for permanent appointment status.
INFORMATION
Lambert began his employment with the City on June 26, 1989.
His position includes custodial responsibilities for the City
Hall and grounds maintenance. Prior to Lambert's appointment,
the custodial responsibilities were performed by a contracted
service. The contracted service was unacceptable at best:
Lambert's is the opposite. He keeps the interior of City Hall
practically sparkling. He also trims the bushes, washes the
window exteriors, maintains the sidewalks, etc., etc.
When the position description and advertisement for the
part-time custodian were developed, a significant goal of those
involved in the process was to find a candidate who would not
only perform the necessary functions but whose work would exhibit
pride in the maintenance of the facility. Unquestionably that
goal was met in the appointment of Lambert. Additionally, he is
very well liked and respected by the staff for the service he
performs.
RECOMMENDATION
I am pleased to recommend that Lambert Derks be given
permanent appointment status as part-time Maintenance/Custodian,
retroactive to June 24, 1990. Since the position is not included
within the position classification plan and pay matrix, step
progression and a pay increase are not applicable.
ACTION RE4UIRED
If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass a
motion granting Lambert Derks permanent appointment status as
Maintenance/Custodian, retroactive to June 14, 1990.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administr ��-
�
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Completion of Probationary Appointment
Maria Karels
INTRODUCTION
Maria Karels' one-year probationary period
Receptionist/Clerk-Typist will expire on August
accordance with the provisions of the personnel
the following appraisal of Maria's performance
for permanent appointment status.
INFORMATION
August 16, 1990
as
24th. In
code, I submit
and recommendation
Maria began her employment with the City on August
During the past year I have found Maria to be a very
conscientious employee who performs her responsibilities
She is very pleasant, helpful and courteous to the many
contractors and others with whom she comes in contact in
capacity as receptionist.
25, 1989.
well.
citizens,
her
Maria provides capable clerical support to the Code
Enforcement department and myself and willingly assists other
staff inembers with projects or workload relief whenever requested
to do so. She readily accepts new challenges and
responsibilities. I have received much positive feedback on
Maria's attitude and capabilities over the past year and feel
that she is a definite asset to the City.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommen
Karels be given
Clerk-Typist.
ACTION RE4UIRED
d without hesitation or reservation that Maria
permanent appointment status as Receptionist/
If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass a
motion granting Maria Karels permanent appointment status as
Receptionist/Clerk-Typist, effective on August 25th, authorizing
her advancement to Step C of Grade I of the City's Position
Placement and Pay Classification Schedule.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 15, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer
SUBJECT: Special Tax District Levy for 1991
HISTORY
In 1987, the City, by resolution, adopted a levy equal to
$10,000 for the purpose of paying the operating and maintenance
costs in our Special Street Lighting District.
The attached resolution places this levy in effect, for the
first time, for collection in 1991.
ACTION REOIIIRED
Adopt Resolution No. 90 -
Street Lighting District.
LES:kkb
to make a tax levy in the Special
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RE30LIITION NO. 90 -
RESOLIITION APPROVING FINAL 1990 TA% LEVY FOR SPECIAL TA%ING
DISTRICT NO. 1 COLLECTABLE IN 1991
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights has, by Resolution No.
87-91, authorized the levy of taxes within Special Tax District
No. 1 for the purpose of paying operating costs of the street
lighting system established within said District; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights has determined that the
sum of $10,000 will be required in 1991 for the purpose of paying
such operating costs.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights�adopt the following levy against all taxable
property within said Special Taxing District No. 1
Operation and Maintenance Costs $10,000
BE IT FIIRTHER RESOLVED that any tax exempt property with said
District be billed for services at a comparable rate computed on
the Assessor's Market Value of such property.
BE IF FIIRTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby
instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the
Dakota County Auditor.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this
21st day of August, 1990.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
�
A
�
�
<
�
�
- ...�.� .�.������ ����t���
CITY OF MENDOTA HETGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87- 91
RESOLUTI(?N ASSESSING MAXIMUM RATE FOR
SPECIAL TAXING DI5TRICT NO. 1
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights as follows:
1. That a special tax levy in an amount not to exceed
.75 mills be and is hereby levied upon all taxable
property within Special Taxing District No. 1 of the
City of Mendota Heights.
Be it further resolved that such levy be made
against all property within such District in future
years until amended by action of the City Council.
Be it further resolved that all tax exempt property
within such district shall be billed an amount equal
to the actual tax rate paid within said District for
the services provided to said exempt property.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights
this 1st day of September, 1987.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
gy �� �. .;�;'
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
, . ;:;
ATTEST:
" �� `� �y � �J � 0� a-�
4`i" , i"
i^�z � :�Y'Y n DeLaRosa
,�-� �Auty City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING PROPOSED BUDGET
WHEREAS, State Statute requires City Council adoption of a
proposed budget for 1991 on or before September 1, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed the City
Administrator's proposed 1991 budget; and
WHEREAS, Council recognizes that the budget document was
prepared on the basis of a preliminary levy which will be
considered at public hearing in November or December of 1990;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights that the City Administrator's Proposed 1991
Budget appropriates expenditures in a manner consistent with
service level needs and preliminary levy funding; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Council hereby adopts the
Administrator's Proposed 1991 Budget dated August 13, 1990 as the
preliminary budget for 1991, subject to amendment following
budget and levy hearings and adoption of a final levy.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this
21st day of August, 1990
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLIITION NO. 90 -
RESOLIITION AMENDING TENTATIVE 1990 LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 1991
WHEREAS, the 1989 State Tax Levy requires the City of Mendota
Heights to certify a tentative tax levy for the year 1991 prior to
September 1, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the levy may be adjusted prior to December 28, 1990,
to an amount not to exceed the adopted tentative levy.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council adopt the
following tentative levy for the tax against all taxable property
in the City of Mendota Heights for collection in the year 1991:
General Fund
Emergency Preparedness
Fire Relief
Infra Structure Reserve
Watershed District
Total General Levy
subject to Limitation
Special Debt Levies
MWCC Sewer Debt
Equipment Certificate
Park Bonds
Improvement Bonds
Total Tentative Levy
$ 1,981,770
1,500
12,650
50,000
20,000
$ 2,065,920
30,000
162,000
180,000
17,400
$ 389,400
$ 2,444,920
BE IT FIIRTHER RESOLVED that the levy shall be amended
following budget hearings to reflect the adopted City budget.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this
21st day of August, 1990.
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk �
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 17, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adm ni
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer
SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Tax Levy and Budget
HISTORY
It is necessary for the City to call a public hearing on our
proposed tax levy and budget. The County will hold their hearing
on November 20th and November 27th while the School District will
hold theirs on November 5th and November 19th.
To coincide with regular meetings, we could call our hearing
for December 4th with December 18th for the continuance if
necessary.
ACTION REOIIIRED
Motion to call a public hearing for Tax Levy and Budget for
Tuesday, December 4th and December 18th at 8:00 o'clock P.M.
LES:kkb
1 X`
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 17, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminil��
FROM: Jeff Stenhaug
Fire Department Captain
SUBJECT: Turnout Gear
DISCUSSION•
I have received two quotes�for Turnout Gear for the fire depart-
ment and they are as follows:
Clarey's Safety Equipment, Inc. $2,831.70
Minnesota Fire and Safety 2,989.40
We submitted a list of items for the quote to each of the compa-
nies. Clarey's Safety Equipment, Inc. did not submit a price on one
item and submitted a price on a lesser quality item. If Clarey's had
provided us with a complete quotation on the items we requested Minne-
sota Fire and Safety would have been the low bidder. Therefore I
request that a purchase order be awarded to Minnesota Fire and Safety
in the amount of $2,989.40. The budgeted amount for these items was
$3,000.
RECOMMENDATION:
I recommend that Council award a purchase order to Minnesota Fire
and Safety in the amount of $2,989.40 for Fire Department turnout
gear. �
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council concurs with my recommendation they should pass a
motion authorizing staff to prepare a purchase order to Minnesota Fire
and Safety in the amount of $2,989.40.
JS:dfw
.�t :;:�-MIN11ft�UIH t,i.li�t,��?�Y rorc�,t� SAr.tilr ' � �
' 'Catn� tate Prot�ection Fire Security � �� � �
,. � � P 4565 West� 7�th � St�eet. , . ` ` • • " °
. . , - •�"MINNEAPOLlS, MI�INESOTA. �5435-5fl09 � :a ` � �. � � , Q � � 1 � O � 2
r 1,'' `' , � h ... , ,. ' . � � ` . .
SOLD ` ' >'� ` �."'Y:;: �6'12) _'893=�79� � � ' , - • ' • - � `. ° ' ' • •
TO . ��"�, �i , .r • � •. ' ` , , . ' � SHIP TO - , , : • > INYOICE DATE
, .. . � �. . � : . . , . . </t� �l� :Cf' `�;;:� � �?`, � � 9 rib
' ' ' � _ " ` .' • • ' ' , ' tJ ' ' CUSTOMER ORDER NO.
' • !� ' ' • ' • ' ' ' � ; . , ' ' �.
rr , . ' , ,.' ' � . , ' .
y... • . , '� . , ,
' - _.''; '";a.i. �# � ,.f`��' ��Y ;�.*, . ' �`• � ., e ,�;;' . � , �1��. '. . , .
.. :y.� ';y . ,�s�:a '?�p - , . � ,. , .' - .. � , �
" :SALESPERSON � .,, �' , Qt}OTE NO.,, �, � , � . • TAX EXEMPT NO: , , , , : DATE SHIPPED � SHIP V W F.O.B.
. '+/►,,r: � .,;...,'�� ,',1: ' ' . , i. ',"}� , ., � . � . . . �' PPD. � COLL.
�,,,Q ANTITY. QUANTITY 8�4CK+ �STOCK . , . �; • , •, . .. ,. ; , . • � ' • , � " . . ' UNIT
DESCRIPTION . . • • ... . . PER AMOUNT
' �' OFtDERED. • , SHIPPED ' � ORGIERED� •,•NO. � . " . • ' , • , PRICE
�: . . ��;�. •. _ - �� � • • " , , . � ` ,
i' . . - ., .�:,`;:,;• , . , " �: ) r�'''". ' �i � '% <i % ��. !i J i!� .. �'i ) rGt % ,+. �.o �:
_ � '-'�<<,�' ��: ' � : - , , , ... . , � . . � ' , . . • •. ' �
� ' ', '' �o �„�.,,..�...�,,, ,��*ru"/t. ✓U d V . oC� 5. - (/ � // '.'�,'„L ' . . • �%v� U � .��.SC!• .ti� ,
,} .��.i4_� �,�.. ,' '+n�� ' �n � �.� . ; . . . r h , �wi+�+�+++r nw�..� � �wrwr�nr �; , , R
.. ...i�[ij'�,i4. , ti. �� .}c. � I` i ' `J-`� `.4 �r • � . - � � � . i � ~f v-�,y�.
.;. ;.�.:��:` �, ';i.' � t�.I�l.rZ ,�..� O ._.�'.G - � ��•'�__-- o�.C� �/Cr�': ,,�:
., - •-,� �`.�....15�.�.��-4 R �...:;.�...�'�_.�i�;. = - - = - - -- - . :..�.... � �' - - -
.., : �, �'i"_ +, .
. ,"•g. ."+ ., 'd.�t .. � . �., . . n �. . Y . . , ' ' y, ' „
. " ...�f� <."��.,: .;..,. ��.�.' � • .'.,.'•, ••. . ' i': ��e� , , � � ` 5 � ��' L'�" �
,, . � ;`>� :; ti����'G.;� . , � , .. , s�'13�"..,�.c�,,..;R;.,,:,iCo`: - ��h� � L'� 6,t� /�_ �� i'� ' � � iG � ° �%'.1 ' '� " {
,.x; , - I � F�h. . � � f ': _, .. �."-� ,i.."y"' ��'T' , •
't,• �RtY,'SY ` � {♦ ' a: �,�`.� •,�,,,,� '.� t,,' . ' '�.1 y �'� , ..•, + ;� �`,_ i - . . . " '..."�R'�!' '��.+. `�-.'?'!�'!� "'a�"�!� � •?-,:p ,Ci•
.l.s„4.4'.: �� .. �:)+?� "t� . tl,a'��• l' 1�' �7 't' y � a't . r� t: ,.L ' '�. . . yk' ��'`MA `� �'.ir �'OIF
'�i�, �� ! t` c� :r,;'�.^„�� ..�'` ' Y. v: j.,3� , r > . UA• �- r •t� ..:s . :.�Yf. '�
�3i ir �-i, I�a..'.✓ '�; �^j���- .�,�:i . .r�.Y::, s '�lfl t" _a.� ,;`� S �� �t.` ..�. .��F K�����.. j
.:� _il::: �4.�a��9t-I�.C�;�,'�'�, Ci�,,,m„{„�GrJ',�,%QY�/�['rs�jcsR.�+�3u+r" - �/%,. �_ ��.j'�;,,;�, -=�`•� ta��; ,+'�.�..�i.
`t'.\; ,i.;.�� ' � .!{'i ..1• � 7 •�� � /. . . .T• a � i � ' '' , ' ., �: .. :t. ., ' . ' , , '
;°�::"+` /:t�; • tr �� �1:.';: . .1 �: . . , � �] , C�,P` . . .'pl' '•ya
',' =`�41:' (,�:ii•. .'.� -i�,, '.'•,,'' •,.•-'�• � � :�„� �;p,�',=�'�`=`'Y . ,�)iC'.L � � �,�. �� /G�J, "' °;.
i,fG. .h . r: ,.c'�, 2 7 � <•� y. �""�'�' .. .i'7.'�, ',?'�s?:i� � 9
!q. 'ig:' r. 7., r`:: 43'i p -}' - ,�-(^.�� a�j�
,,�,;:.; '.*:,:. , nr^' � , ,%;..
�ri� .l. ti r�1 •.�`: � ;i. s' � �
:l' .s' Sf.. � i `h. �t"�� +�.� - �� :3�' . x
7" ,�-:4'•N' `"� r y��� �`."� l�w ••`Yyvitr�'Z,�, ,t«.
�i ,i:^�t� =} ��y�r.d,'I5 �.. �i��,' � �Y.. :�.?���z'�� �+�, ,d , l r ..�r... ,o .y
�: �+a..: �'t� `-�,. �� "'X*':� tr� .e.. ��1':���p� FiY . l:y� . :i• '•,rs•. `.�;'.��j
e�r� �'v�7Jv', i.,r,,y i,:J' �t' ,.i:. y t v.; * - _ ' ,p i/'�
— ..t� _ %� .Xy.,7 `3r :�J .r .w % v -
- Aio� � x � , d�5-� CvC.f-'�i�''.', �.:'_; - - - -- ��i . - --- -" i.,.,r.,'. -
-,�•; , �...�..,
�; ,`ci�',�+ '' �',.:4^;��,'+ 2 `5... , .. �1'� , , � .'r +!' _ . , . e+i�..-'- - �
..f�' .' 1' " , . � �, " ,(6. �i� . '. , . .%: • `� �` . � , . , r�t�, 3 t;v
� ";�, y'�i . j �''y�, � � , • cl ` r C.�Jti �°: ` " �. :�- � �f' � �. a � � �J
': . . :. � . ,`.,,+-, , ,.'�' � ��"'^:.�"h,, '' . a. _ 3
�Sr+,':r=r� �:�:.,`. ',R��' {�r �i'�,�:�. y ' ;,, ':+, • �•,• ' � ' � tyt�?p�' :�.t?iF.
:��'.T�:• � µ•� +�.x � , {i'Y',.. 5.i .,w��i f��' 'C.. .+ _ . , '`
,}� .e}}, .3 ��'� ���.'..?�i�i{.� Y, .^d:....-�1...:.. 'r4a ';�� fl1�Y . . ' Y"�i' 4[_CS;.�N�% ,
•.�+Y� F{�ti -i,� Y ':Lt�. g � '.;3 ,_/ �ni,' �n. ` . •y ':�:'��'.
N, 6.4 %v J' - +'• �
��' F I/`.
R� yR�i
►sI � �* i:
u.jZ, �
� a�y '
--+%�. - - -- -- - - - .� `
R� � - -
� - �'' - -
Y� - ----- - -+-� -
',,
:s�� �,'.�r.�' -� ��
:.• . .. ;+w^� . . • �. +y�
.,7�;< ''�!..�..� • "F. T' . ��
i �,. _..
�• �5, �., ' . + 1 , . .. ; � � '; /� � � ' , '- , r ' . - . . , y + . � I. ���v~ • • �; �
a. '� a p(rr' `'�4 ��', � � .•� ����Y�' J�{/J{ '. . ..��i'o�•I`1 a ' • .. i�yY��R��l![w� � '� • .1
�'�w�R�w'A!pfi► �w�r�1 `�rA� ^ � �wl�'�' �
;. � _ . 1 i. , S�.r .Y... .�,: ;i- £ : ..`.,�;% ti:'':n. �„� � r , , a,�'+ ..:e�t'. F� . �J _ ) , . ,�,h'. . iq, t : t-,.�
' � �,!b1� .Y k. �. �'�" ti . , . +' .
�t e." .S. . .{.. y�,, o,�.i.`_ .L'fv ,µ
'�� �" '
�i�" 'a' .n.� 't�• �'(,
i• ����' '� .Yf u .t'i':" ,�, : i 'y "%
•�i +� :�y� r.r�� a� • >.�
:.`0 ,1 t .,ie .+� i �s,
;;i:'r �' o�
w,. .i.. '>..:
•1 �; .
<.._, .��-:
;K
ti j A�:.'
.�I��" �!' rf ,
:_.�''1'7 - u 'l�'' ` r,�'
� .i.: _ ''�. .a�-s= ���' l`���t�S�'''�`=u.t1. �Fl�sa_.,_ — ._s.°__ 'o�i - .� ....��
� „: � ''? , _ . �y u�' . , ` . �{ .
ilY ',�a.�' , _ .u, �/ � � � '4i � ��, .�y �r? �� .. � , . !'1 .
.,, ;d�. ,,.':i.ti.c..�� ^ if"r,rpi`�•��-��"/f"�sX.Sy ^/I,L.Yoi ��l- Ca +µ� �•� �u .�J`�siY��,'�' /1�0. oo• ' ;�t • .
DEWERY .;,� a ''� �;r ,, . . ..,p.. , e TERMS: , . . ' . . , .
f�, 4 �^" �" �'`.�. "� .. • ,'' ` �.. � . ik�. . ,; � � • �
� ; �. . �-�;4, '` . '(�� PARl1AL'; ,r �� roCOMPLETE,:, i • ' ' . < < :,.c..: -:, � , �,� ' � „ � . ` . • . . - SUB-TOTAL -, ,,�F� .
- ' DEWERY BY: . . � , ,•. ' ` :'� � , �t`�,'.' . , , � ' ' . - }
,. .» DATEL.,.' � '�:'���.� r �
' v ` • . . . . . '� _ . . ` , � , �,.' '• • , , , • ^ -
:":'y— � ` �f? +^' TAX
_ ; . • ��. ; � ' ;;-rq.. ' .�,'�� � • , . . �;�, , , , � , . . .
_ FECEIVED BY: ;A, �; ,:. . , DATE: , .. i � ;; �. . � . .. . ,. � • ' i .. �` � � • ` . .
. �.i, �' ' �hw.���,,"" ' . �i,}"�+ �. :3 ' ' .
..;'t.. . '�'". . ,r;i .. .� . �'>, � ; °F`:�S ;''� • „'4:, • . ,'' : , : , , . . .. , . � . . , � TOTAL _ � ..
�,_.i« •'' , . . - • . •s
_ .1�:•.;`}: :i. '..`�+ L , �� 1 :tif�.����.:'y.Y•' � ��' r "
�� ::.` r,
„[. .,,,t: . _� �i�:.,'.:r;� ;;,� �.'t�r ", ,���, _ c.�/�� C'4 ,i0t�l' I' . , i. � ' - �
r�: < �; e�: "''f� ,.r, . 1�i�otCEC � ,: .. `s;;; : )'�- Q� Q .
''� . , .. • ,, 'G - .. • .�. � . ;t:;;�z� ' .. .
. ,r; .. . , _ , . _ ;C::/VIU�1ill V
. • i�:`, ,�: , ..;.: ,5/ou.CC1� �t . . �5%Fi. G , ,
• .. 1" . . . - •�; =;a.,.r4','d",'� , . •,,•`;�'>� ,,- ,_t ;,.;;;,, . . . . :'tE.�,,. ;'ti,::•' . , r.
•,� . , .. 'h� :. � �. F� _---- - � „ i• ' , . . • .. � ' ���1�� . . , , . . . � � , . �
, ,`e;a,,.,.,. _ �-�'.�--------- -----_._.____...._._.----- - -- - -- - - ---- - - �
� CLAREY'S SAFETY �
EC�UIPMENT, lnc.
NORTHGATE SI-lQPPlIVG CENTER • ROCHESTER, M!V 559Q1
�
TO
MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE I}�PARTM�ENT
2121 DODD RQAD
N�NDOTA HEIGHTS, MN. 55120
�
We are pleased to quate as follows. Your inquiry
�
�
�. , , . ��; �I� ► !�� � t
�ate AUGUST 13TH 1990
- u : 1 '� i� � :
Prices uated are
F.o.B. �LIVERED
Delivery 75-90 DAY'S ARO
MORNING PRIDE NVODEL �� 2110 �5" YELLOVJ NOi�X IURN
t}UT CQATS, AS PER YOUR PUBLISHED SPECIFICATIONS,
YOUR SPECIAL FIRE DEPARTMENT PRICE WILL BE......... $
MORNI�iG:.PRIDE MODE�. �� 2110 Bl3NKER PA(aTTS, AS PER
YOUR':;PIJBL�ISHED ::SPEGIFICATIONS, YQ�1R SAECIAL FIRE .
I3�PARTf�NT°�PRICE�WIL�;BE ...........................
� �. �+� _ ^ .., i.� y 7 �� � , y'.:.•..v w, �
���1 'F"i}��'��'� �a��� q,'.�t::���� ' i">>`� ��,:��r •w� `�.,. ., ...�
��A�+iDARD: Mi�;�IIVC;�PRIDEr°S�iSPE��R�:.::�:�'::.=.:..;�::; ..._:... . .. :�
�+{ORNI�NGt:PR-IDE��DYN��BACIC ` SUSPENDER �� � � �`�' -�`, "�; , �� °;>-�' , ;'.,;,° ..
: b��.
YM" i r �� ���.�7 Y�M,'�� • M' ♦
� � �•Y� ` ♦
SERWS�.MOI�L��'��:�7;1�7 FI�EBl�EAlCEft �&IOTS. : .�.:: �:`:�: ; ; : r:`,� *�,
�IR�'�t�f�$�t�01JES: :�: :-t�:�� ;� :���: �,... :.... . . � ... . . ;�,��� xf
P B I FIRE FIGHTER�' O�Ot'��= ..w. �:.:��°.�'=.�;��..,�_ �,wy:.;f�,�aa��� c
,. , ; ., ��1 ,_
S1'ANDARD MORNING� :
PRI,DE��S
FIREMANS MITTSo�t���£S�� G
SPAI�NER WRE[�Ci�:.:��: .;,.�:�
CAIRNS MOI�EL ��`;�R9HPA RATC
CAIRNS L2fi2BX�wIMiER _LI1�
SPANNER BELT.;':�:����:,;�:�
t'!�?tiSq1i
A%�.•
iVOiE: R9NP R�i"CI�E�'��
HOOD AS PRIC��C
COVER EFFECTIUELY.
V�i�,i.i/�iJi:i\��� � fN�=OYti�i"M':��"i��"���
��EsT. N�PA�r���";���.•:.
'�° '.�'Kk.'�e�' ;•q: c P"';
i�:.�`.�w'� �., ..
:�� ..y._..e...»,., _.��....,,.. .t . . : ; .
ET �KIT ����� �.'� .; ` ;
•�'�rl.v�� �.������A
M" 'iJ`�'iA�:6 A��j�/'k��w R " �+
�i r'� f � i • ' ���,�iK 1�tYi3�1�r*�{1 � •
'�; ���i, ��`;�>' :
.� �.. . . r.r.� r;• Y.:.�.,.€.
_ . ,���:��:� ��.; �� �: � .
s
WILL NOT
SA FET Y t S C� UR B USINESS
i � :11 : :il•
� � ! . . , .
. .
257.50 �` �
1 fi7.5Q � � �'
�9 �(�f� :,L .
� uv
16.00 -,''�P
��i�r� , : 6!'�2/^:j5'�0j�t <r� : •f.
. �•�✓:� VV�' � �„�,•p,
-�.�1$;��a?��'' -'`' �'
����;i �°00� `� ��
'�NOyBT1l ��.�..": l �;;�
t;C � `�� ..
k' �.7J'� "e c�C
:�:12:: 5� :..:"`° . r �°
� " . !.nlK,�%f ��
�('icfi�i fk�
xr�
�
r �
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 15, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini t�r
��
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer
SUBJECT: Park Bond Issue
HISTORY
Park bond issues totaling $3, 400, 000 have been approved by the
City voters, and a substantial amount of work is now under contract
and expected to start in the near future.
The following projects are now in process:
Land Purchase
Neighborhood Parks
and.Equipment
Trails
Sibley
Reserve for Additional
Projects 270,000
Issue Expenses 12,000
$1,700,000
30,000
$1,730,000
$ 110,000
482,000
325,000
500,000
Approval Issued
Issue Discount
Proposed 1990 Issue
We would plan to have the sale of the issue at the
October 2, 1990, Council meeting.
ACTION RE4IIIRED
Adopt resolution No. 90- , authorizing $1,730,000 park bonds
for sale on October 2, 1990.
` � �
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
HELD: August 21, 1990
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota
County, Minnesota, was duly called and held at the City Hall in
said City on Tuesday, the 21st day of August, 1990, at
o'clock .M.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC SALE
OF $1,730,000
GENERAL OBLIGATION PARK BONDS OF 1990
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Finding; Amount and Purpose. It is hereby found,
determined and declared that this City should issue $1,730,000
General Obligation Park Bonds of 1990 (the "Bonds") to finance
the acquisition and betterment of parks, consisting of
neighborhood and community parks, bicycle and pedestrian trails,
and community ballf ields .
2. Meetina. This Council shall meet at the time and place
specified in the form of notice hereinafter contained for the
purpose of opening and considering sealed bids for, and awarding
the sale of, the Bonds.
3. Notice of Bond Sale. The City Clerk is hereby
authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and
' purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper
of the City and in Northwestern Financial Review not less than
ten (10) days in advance of date of sale, as provided by law,
which notice shall be in substantially the form set forth in
Exhibit A attached hereto.
5351
i ♦
0
4. Official Terms of Band Sale, The terms and conditians
af said Bonds and the sale thereof are fully set forth in the
"�fficial Terms of Band Sal�" attached hereto as Exhibit B and
incorporated her�in by reference.
5. official Statement. The Gity Clerk and Treasurer and
ather officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to
participate in the preparation of an o�ficial �tatement far the
Bonds.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resalution was
duly seconded by member and, after ful3
discussian thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the
foll.owing voted in �'avor thereof :
and the �'ollowing vated against the same:
Whereupon said resalution was declared du3y passed and
adopted.
5351
2
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 16, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis���
SUBJECT: Decline of Property Donation - Wagon Wheel Trail
Recently we received an offer to have a parcel of land located
along Wagon Wheel Trail donated to the City. It is the intent of
this memo to address the terms of the offer and to review any
possible public purpose which may be served by the City assuming
ownership of this parcel.
BACRGROIIND
The parcel, which is approximately one acre in size, is
located north of Wagon Wheel Trail, east of 35E and west of Roger's
Lake (see attached map). The owners of the property, Alois and
Adeline Wagner, have offered the parcel to the City if the City
will assume all pending and future assessments.
Staff has reviewed the assessment records and reports that an
assessment of $1,800 was deferred against the parcel in March of
1983. Interest accrual since then would amount to a total
assessment liability of approximately $2,500.
Engineering staff has reviewed the location - and
characteristics of the parcel and finds no public need for the
land. The property is largely unbuildable due to wet conditions.
In addition, staff sees no other public usefulness for the parcel
at this time.
Obviously, public ownership of the parcel would render the
parcel tax exempt. The parcel currently generates $402 of tax
revenue annually (see attached property tax statement).
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above information, it is suggested that the City
decline the offer to acquire ownership of the parcel. The decision
to•undertake public owner•ship of property should be based on a
clearly defined publi
Even though it is not
is certainly unusual f
City, and the Wagner'
ACTION REQIIIRED
c purpose, which in this case does not exist.
recommended that we acquire the property, it
or individuals to offer such donations to the
s should be thanked for their generous offer.
Should the Council so desire, it should adopt a motion
approving staff's recommendation to decline the offer made by the
Wagner's, and should direct that the attached letter be sent
informing them of our decision.
August 22, 1990
Mr. and Mrs. Alois T. Wagner
2172 Fuller Road
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80920
Dear Mr. and Mrs.,Wagner:
Recently the City received your letter in which you offer to
donate to the City a parcel of land located along Wagon Wheel Trail
within Mendota Heights. This parcel is formally identified as
parcel identification number 27-16400-133-00. Your offer to donate
this parcel to the City is quiet generous, however I must inform
you that at this time we must decline your offer.
On August 21, 1990 the Mendota Heights City Council formally
considered your offer. As I am sure you can understand, the
decision to assume public ownership of private property is of great
concern to the City because such transfer removes the land from the
public tax rolls. For that reason, the City must determine that
such ownership is in the public's best interest and serves an
identifiable public purpose. After a thorough review, the City has
found that acquisition of your property is not supported by an
identifiable public purpose.
Your donation offer is greatly appreciated, and we are
disappointed that we are unable to accept the property at this
time. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or
comments you may have.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Tom Lawell
City Administrator
MTL:kkb
14 June 1990
City of Mendota Heights.
This is an offer to donate the lot on Wagon Wheel Trail
(see the attached copy of tax statement) to the city of Mendota
Heights, with no strings attached.
We will pay the taxes due this year 1990, and costs
normally paid by the seller in transferring this property deed.
Al1 assessments, �ending and future to be assumed by the city of
Mendota Heights.
Please have the Mendota He:_ghts city attorney draw up the
necessary papers for us to sign the deed over to the city of
Mendota Heights.
We are planning to be in the Twin Cities area on 31 August 90,
and can sign the deed over to the City of Mendota Heights on that
date, otherwise we will handle all correspondence by mail..
The title for this lot shall be transferred to the City of
Mendota Heights by 15 October 1990 or this offer is void.
Adeline E Wagner
�y^ T
/ �(i• G V / f
Alois T Wagner
< -�
. � 1`
� f
. • - �, ���� :�,i� �
i� �
rr.r�/(� GUVeHNMENT CENTER "'""' ' "� �" � ' '� ""'"�� ~�riti�v �
�, Y�l:/� � �% �±'i� ir •� ii V V!'"1 � NASSINGS, M!V $5033 .�
DAKOTA COUNTY TREASURER �
S�G"d�^;PftOi'E:LYbBNTIFlCAMIN�'h.:<'� y Hi RES NON—IiSTA
n�is rHoremw oescewnoro rowv Nor
��sr .. . ... •.us .. . wr. ,.auc, eEAFUlIOfSLFlIPi7QN.ITISUSED PR�PERTY
c�v wn wx au�s CtASS N�A
27 16400 138 00 CAitOLIDIES LAXE YIEW
q?��i. �.w/s: :f�i;:w�wcooe t�::. E 100 FT OF LOT 13 EX PT New
. iiGWY rr,�pRovar�tars N/A
' 13
AMflKBT
VAIVE $ 7Q0
f.. RENTftiPoltiIONOFPR6PERiY �
PfAD THE BACK OF Tl95
STAlEMEN7 70lEAttN ABOUT AMOUM TO USE IN fitUNG IXR YOUR
T��������T� 1 PflOPEFiTVTAXflEFUNOFORMM•1PRIFEIIGIeLE.
��ryp�sl� IF TNIS 80% IS Ct/ECKED YOU OWE DEtlNOUENi YAXES
ARE YOU Et3GI8CE FOR A REfl1ND iD REDtfCE YOtiR TAXt
YOURPAOPERTYTA%8ff9fl6 ssu.�o
2 qEpllCTprygyyTATE.PAiO
ALOIS T & ADELI2iE £ WAGTIER �su�meneais
3 Y�OUN VHOPERTY TA�% flEOUCE ,� %.,� Z
21?2 FULLER RD
coLoiuwo spxZxcs ca_ , , , ao�2o
t ALDZ3 T& ADELINE E WAGNER
� 2172 FULLER RD
� COLORADO SPRTNGS CO $0920
. .• •,•.�•••T:'••.;••.••:« - SPECIAL ASSE55MENTS :. • •.
'^ � x
?^ �o i 9.i00 i
0 '�WANCODE�.. 10TALTAXONRENPLLWRIWNOFPflOPEFfY�.'
i _ — .__
' PItOPENTY CLASS "�
hi�j�j;STD
i. AMW N7 TO USE IN FlLllNO OUT VOUN PflOPERTY
TAX flEFl1ND FORM M•t Pq, IF ELIfi1BLE.
ALdIS T& ADELINE E WAGNER
2172 .FULLEIi RA
0
q �s�no nrm
aex�cixnxw. cnear
6 NED CE � inxAT
VOUN %iOPEflTY TA)( AFTEX
6 fl£04)Ci10N8Y5TA7E•PND
wos nrro a�ass
� couMv
e cma+iaM+
e sra�oo� omn�cr
to svEwu.uxrx7aurncrs
TOTaL PNOPERfY TAXES
I l BEFoflE SPE W C aS5E55MENiS
saEcw. uscssn�rr�s ao�o
tz toniS7morExnwt�
YOVN'SUiAI PRffPERTY TAX
13 �D SPECUU. ASSESSME
!F THIS BQX !S
CttECKEO, V8V OVYE
GEUNQUENT 7AXES
� �
N6$.72
63.70
� 33T.58 442,42
94.69 96.88
60.77 76.24
1fi5.41 213.89
't6.72 i5.01
33?.5$ uoa.oz
� 33?.58 NO2.02
201.01
„ • .201.U1
1934 PROFERTY TAX STATEMENT
STATE COPY
7HSS STATE COPY OF TtfE TAX STATEM£NT IS TO HE
USED 70 CLA�M PNOPEflTY TAX REfUND ANO
SPEWAL PflOPEFiTY TA% REFUND FflOM THE
MINftE56TA DEPARiMENi 4F HEYENUE.
!F YOU PAY YOl/R OWN TAK DfTACH PAY
57It&S BFfOR£ YUtJ Fk.E CLA7M
TAX SUMMARY
'inXEStEnE4 1t�S 7a
PflINCPAI.
Y17EflEA
402.02
�..
; ���1�7
; K.5 �z3.,°��!``• ,',.
.-• r r�f �f.'=
'4''rf�' NnK : -Y.' r�::
•..f"9,'+M !fh�. � �'F�.p:",4r�1%:
- ���p `.^��,��.. !.���y,.�-•4kr.,�i
..�. + W y„y,, /.,�`�,
�:t - . .. . .
. r.�.,
r_�,z:: �n�-,;-„ :. ..
y,�`i': ''*`F.e�: s�'.�,�'f
' " - �• . '.�_..
_ . - : -�•.` �• �f..l��� 'r+" *
�
z~
��~ •f •'YH.:wyl.�+{.t�sa'�i5�� ..: .. j �.!
''• . , `t ` .: N �
� , . �.
�:�F`: Hr,:y��'�:i. y'��f..
�„j�t's`1'.•'•i�'•CY� .- ... ... �' �
♦ V t: . _ ...r. `•-.r---.a"�'+
i
�',�'� . ,",' ���^'-�=�--:..�.—.- ��,
�f4'`r'€-,�' n.r ^";4'^`��.,:��SY"„�`v : t..X.'.` �������Vti�c!`y�
; N-.;.;
�! �rr> �,, 1 �''�r� �3., � w "w "' + �'Y. s.:a;�,
A ;.3�. . a... . -. .n.'-� „��� :�. n5:+m.�
:i :?t�'•. '` '", i. ' . ': �i'.y S ' • . '�'qs�....1(.
�� ..a � i.��; a ' � .T;'�';'�-i's :f�; et^. �'�3� s::+`t x�fv:
-�;,�`�;�:x:`;,�?;K.:,;';�,'�w' . �,�;.h�.;�:; .�k;� y���s�;:;:.�.»
^rk� ..
:1 ,r{'� : , ` 1.. ` "� y"��y Gs :�Y;a.t'fi�ri�'.'�r
''1, _ ;•J� �C)�•}I. �.Y.. 'd.'hh�� �E Ai:'Y.' i.ir � 4�=
�M. ;2e-;,: ,� .;'�',� -n:�<�;+._k:r ..;,£:•�.9,�. �_�4"� :•l.,:;:. .
�t,. _ � i.,,", x,'.f.'''t^.+,.`sc.;'.�"R:;
�,: •� •i;..�ey •;;:I , . ` .. .+1��..:.'iC..;;
�,:;.. . , .. ...;` x�z.,+'s:,.,,, :
• y �,�.-�� e�; .{t�.::�, {,:.; �,
ri.r�iy ;�i�>: -_y-; t 't�P�, i?;h�:;'�;a�('.
�h : t� � .�= � �;
•:u?c;i� :.;i-. :�'„'T';�4r: �'+".M.;�:'��s'z n:v.. �.
�` �.t'd�� . r. . �.�ivi;y, �;iY,y..7:1:`...., - '.
:.r. � ': M '`�7;A.. .;!� :�..,..:;,�.,id''�°�:�
.. .._. . R, .,�:�` , ._ 'S .___..w,; _
r'.J"i , - _ - _ 'fi � y,.
S,�" �r
�
�1 > �b
"'�
�f �4
:,.:K.. i.,. 4 ��y�'� . �
. , , if:' C'i'�'.�•` ��C...r,�,
��Sr� .. .�£s,i,;�{.".`Y. _.,.�„�'�`
yd',:• �''� '? .,'v,;'�c .•'sl.titaS.?:':.`:'......
S' .�.4<: iV'�t.ii:ny ~ , t '. .. .. y��f.
. . _.,1�r ''•.�X1'A�1..�S.f.�'�+''" '"�,`i •' -
, ��p,
,t: • . , t�^,,,,,,,• � ... .0
,"Y.:.r :.�.^ ^'�';tc"k�I<f:x".tk: �'� tY;;"
'.{: ..� •,r .�' •• � �Iy��j��lr M111' _
\�, �e.. „�u,y,,A, ,, .
�:„.: . � f'- ^ .
�� '{ri'Y.):� ., -r.. ;::.- .
,V {� •i� ..�ai�
¢•
� `f
,. ♦
t
1
�
�� i �wf
: tr
i r
� i/
��Y�, � Q , .y7;:
.,� V • _ Q1 ,
.._`_.- _ � �'.r
� 4 � '.,
n r��
�
�
O
N '
iI
W
�
U
�
�yi�.��,r.� ,.�"@r . � ."`.j1 (
;' 't''? ;4 . . . . :Yii=.,�
=5�+�'.�, �'�- r R� �: . ��' '• T Yx, i " ,
.� .�� ,; '>.'� ��'��:,: � �--
... • w:&'�$,� ',,��k a1�'. �^ �.. � ;.+ .
'�"'•�,�'�a ' 1`' c.ya'{�,ii, 7` ,.+1:.aF. . 'v. _ v S ';s
<T • is ..�,+, . � �.,
J
'�,. ��� .�. .
:�
. 1••
.�
�,u;. •� . �,s� i. :?;c
ix�.•�"'S;... , rN;'., �:Cc,,a :F� 'T.4.A Z., � :�` ;A
;:i�.. . .�:� . . ty • A' '�'y:� ' . , ,.. \
.. Yi b'`� ' � � '�ii^' } � �i, `."�;ti�:'��'"'�2� �.
'4t� .� =. a. r�;... e :^'S.,`r q' 'S ��
� - r ,k ' '`i ` ,. . . ai'i..�. .:'�t; " � `'.�'+,•• �'•'!+^ . �.
...�, • � M 4�'\..� � ..t .L. ;` ;r „}��i��:Sr-...'t,a.,�,y�`-:" '. .,'t`t
' ��'� a.. '„ ,tti`�-' ., -i.'4. V .:.: 5rt: xF t��`i:'�, ,. . .
�4 `' . . .. 1 . . 4'-3M1 �' . t:4 .. yf:t' � ,.s4., N•t ,
, ' �y` '.z..� . �s7y�� I�.:��i i.. ��•"� �`.�Y:p ,. •�
. v,a.,: "r-+ 1�;Y�- � � •, • ,`',.c'� '�"i .,',>'.. .:�.. : Y. '�!,L +l?;�}?� �^,. ^ •<�;.
s .��2 �.:, S �� , , . . i, ,t�Yanz. 'r. i
. i .. . . �t��,�. . . i*+'_.,.a AS (,+��,�( 'R0.:iy i .t y.'..
'% '+. ��s , ' '�. •, ` '��•�ti' ' ' �fi� 1 ,4. :
_ ., xy,� y,,. ;�c ,. ;;�v'�:' ; : , ry `'� :
�.; • . . ' _ ?�,;,k " , "t,: {.' T ';,�, : i, , . .., �.,;��*�a 2 i ,. ' ' . . .:; ', � .
7 t�,''`:' . T, , `ti�,... �i`l; • FC;. •... , , ,,;`v_��Y`•i•� �,. ;r,
i �;, : ; �;t���.' ;:i ' �,,,,�,a..,�,' t�.', `� �,::: �- `. - ,: �'ti:'.,�;w.:
ts +' ��`, �' �,° :.n':� -:a,,?_'ti"+.' siia.' '�i �. + '�, sw^ fMti;i.,. �
'J�' i:�h ���-�. i,.��4 ...'�.{a•T;t"- _ ' '��`�'s�,�'1yu•'• � '�y i>N '�'<1:t„
'+'•e "kiiiA ' K,: •M1:�f; ,`X �5i � t+:r.r t�;�. , . ::r•. ,.,
i' 4:+
` • �q't .s.Y�: ' .��.`v'i} � `"P��, t 4i`\;��x ."-'N��"' �/_',"tri � .. �\yw'r°Ii.
T � ` , � ` �' . ` � y� :3p .�.`i ;.3��� .,4+,� ,.,5: . • q.. .. -
, '::,:.' }�s;ss���. ''�=.; : ' . . .:,. • ,i,, 4 r . ��+.; .�1. ; .,
, "i� �"n;� , ',' ,� , ,.•\,i.. '�.. �' �a,.;,�-,,.. ':;^` ••< • •, , ' - , " • '
z- � . .. - �i� .-t � . `` �� ` sP; `.i Y ..r�3. v„ •x� .� '` "-t'. ::�i`. i }*._ . � .
;,y�.p, a.: 'l ".. �"' ,'r,:.<: ;
. e��,�i&•. ,. � �� .i�'�,��_ � •':�'a-••.� 1 , . i ' .�.v . ._ "
� T' ,-`,�..^i^�. ,.�'w'r .��. 1,`.,1:•.•-' � i5i���u.�:� +
'. M1�� t�. �r.�:: � � � .:.�t ♦ U
, .�.•`":p � . ,5. � t. ;�:':'n. • •4;�t5i.^; `.� �., " ' .. . . ^�'..t � . �� �M.' .
, > ` : � =� _ `�Yi.'t��ti.�,,"jy�ti,'a�,' .. `x. :t���� ~•').�4": 'i4y'+`„-• ', '
-.j=..' y , ..,?,,,:e',�ti.,, :�s`K.'' T.�'i• �,x;'�� �,` '.
�,.:y. ., . ` . .;�,i,� :„ . . ..� R"+;;�'3r'�.`".� �:::r, �"^�;,�'' ;;+.`:y� Yy ' "'Y���t� �� ;+,:�:ii`,i:"�,�"4'y�'.� :�: � .
` �'a: ' - 'x".^.F' ' y � "<-.''�• v::"�'..',a'�. . E�" :.�,1 ;Y' �''� ' 1
�'�', .
,. . . .v� , � ;�.. .:�`sM1�.r ."t'-�;��i�'":;� .},y. `�i;; -F,�"^vp_, ^�`,..;a �� -..��,,:: "�ce•�.
.x .
� } � , i�: .t . .-s •.
P.
�»� 17
♦ 4 +�.�.
..;i t.��,'
_ � ..� ' �:�.
�r, -i+
`�=� M4'v
;� . ';>:Z-. +�
- +» ^ir � � 1 `'t��. _
�;. , i'.r' ::•,,,
..:�r -.� . ,.:, ��,:
�1 _•� .;i:"`e.~��.;% . �?:::;'-�p,y.,;^;'Y�,''^�.;� i� '^-,%,�yc"�..'*,,'"w. ' + ,�: ,:�
s, *'7:. �`Vz� r ,���+` � � •. '�i'`�`•
� y � ,. ..H. �'�dM?�.L2 iti:��. : - . , .;,' .. 4F �y� +}t�•wSr., `� : `�?r._zpi�y,, '' � •14,�5.,�.! '!•''"":{.,. .
1� ; ` , j„ y .at1�y.,.,.�.:w �.. . "'� ti..�.� �'-r�!�,lf'� �•� '�
e `�.i ,.J �'('`au` • �.'4• . ':..i.`SY.��•..!�4�e""�"r.. ,,.r „ ;i'ti..� �'�'E�� 2} �.1�\$w.11a �rt' ' .
'� �y�� i�.� ht, i�,�, i� • r. ti..' .w��.ia:x.... ... —'r :tt`4;> \�,� e.yi�.�;." '1;.
i. , *'`� . +i� : y't'.... '
`,,�; � . ', ' ' ' ';'.�o _ . ' '�� q.,� `lii. +s�.'i. .:::. ��. . .. `�.r,}``is , ^4
' .Yi . h},�4:O,F-.',`: ?':Y 'k'.yF,
\ . : � ,^.x, r.�\:: 4 � r,.; � � w, � ' ��,
�j.T .`� -, . :i .�•«�;�..,i'^';��u6�ti�: ��
' ��1: � 'l... . � e � . 1 �m.�."'.It h� ";.'L.
� � , ' '��' '`x,�•..il'i�: � "' s '. ,
. . • .,. ' �t:' � F .rsf.�;..:�,A...,j •. �"C.
,� .. ., ..'.•�:.'.. %�' `t: . . � .
':. ,,. `r�..
•� ti� _ . , I � , , ° �'n-_ � .. ''i�„`r:�.� �� �..`
� ' `�' },. ' :y �. , . �r, � �.k � ["• ,:�'' ��4.,'. `',.v `1: ; �..t.
`�,' .. . •��`�''.•;, . ' . ci�: ,;,1':� �,,,� Yj,� `�. �. + '�' aJai'i� {, - . .
<,\ ' c a . �.. � x2��;, 't.�"* �r' v.11.'fjli4 .� •
� �. .._. y� K s . k � �' . r`� ..}� ' . .. .. „ } s''+�.
_. _.�_ . �f . F . �`i� ��'•... .ta,�: �r;tir." a.. � . .....
. rr � -� .. .:ix..t. sr�.1: : .,. -:"i '. �'`... .;n.'.�`4�„�..,.y;i1ti.{ � t• • .� � ., .y �..
"� � y� '�irv� . �Yr'�� : h ,{�lS':Y`� �..nwV'Nyi ^4::4.g�.�i« .. ., e �n' � .
`��µ `�„ � wfL j}� �
� �, i �`� •w a'� �,;; � " :'.y':`•a,. ', ..
�� , ''�'"?r�LL' ,�;'^ • ^" �`�'i.�,..,��%en`'�.'�a �'��* �y •`�+ , '},
,,�. .�� . u ,Fy�ii.�::K 2;?'kk',�Tt : �.
�� . ., � • . �"�`�";�''`� ' �' t .I �_.- `'"'^' � �'*.• -
`ti��., . �S'��'+ ��,�4' a�<. ^,s�; �f''•Y}''s� ��, "'
� ���•�� � '1i..' • ` � �t \': ' ��;`iJ,•:: kr1!:.-..
•,nt. �/� f`.
"�i�'40°efi�'',� � Y'aa.i,.' ^c,, �";.<,i'`=.. �'"
�Y�" • ...";4al��:.���i,�k .rr;: •";{�r'��. `�4.�+�:'.,"� ,,,,t:�„
.1�,�`S•�,;; ��"
. . � ..: A . . d.: Fb,! `��t-y .. , . c.. _ _ � tAl� •"Y:... •w �.: n�..�7: „
' � 1
, Y r.. � _ .._ � .
" �� tro . .. ._. . _ � � .
,�l _.. ' . -
�
� `_ ._._ � ..._ .__ _._ .___ .___ __ _ __ _._.
t;'••.7t: �?, i ,`s;t�
'i: :a:
` �� : t4� :: r�'�
� __�.____,.-_
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
� i�
► �� y� �i
WHEREAS, State Statutes require that appointment of election
judges must be made by City Council resolution; and
WHEREAS, the following list of persons has been submitted as
qualified election judge candidates for the � Primary and General
Elections : t G�G'j,� ;
PRECINCT NO. lt Somerset School. 1355 Dodd Road
D June Wagner
R Rita Green
D Edwina Burrows
R Salley Countryman
D Eileen Mullen
1392 Farmdale Rd.
1134 Ivy Hill Dr.
681 First Ave.
648 Ivy Falls Dr.
1126 N. Kingsley Ci.
PRECINCT NO. 1 Fire Station, 2121 Dodd Road
D Laurita Weinzettel
D Rita Maczko
R Virginia Simek
R Nancy Kruse
Carol Redding
Hubert Meier
2140 Dodd Rd.
907 Cheri Lane
814 Hazel Court
902 Cheri Lane
2331 Pueblo Lane
795 Keokuk
451-6199
455-5842
457-6658
457-4770
454-6060
454-4659
454-1628
454-6247
454-3854
452-4896
454-2165
Co-Captain
Captain
PRECINCT NO. 3�, Mendota Elementarv School. 1979 Summit Lane
D Jean Fransen 2170 Pilot Knob 452-1390 Captain
D Mary Hartz 2200 Pilot Knob
R Cynthia Klecatsky 1078 Theresa 454-7602
R Annabel Randolph 541 W. Emerson 457-3863
D Ray Burrows 681 lst Ave. 457-6658
PRECINCT NO. 4� He� Siblev Hiah School, 1897 Delaware
D Marjorie Cheesebrow 594 W. Marie 454-1140 Captain
D Pat Hetinger 658 Callahan Pl. 454-3150
R Theresa Esslinger 632 Callahan Pl. 454-1132
D Dolores Radabaugh 653 W. Marie 454-3190
R Rosemary Hildebrant 1783 Delaware 454-2432
Eileen Rosenbaum 1850 Eagle Ridge Dr. 452-9689
PRECINCT NO. ,5� Ro al Redeemer Luth. Church, 1960 Lexington
R Janan Gainor
D Rosemary Murphy
R Bill Burke
R Evelyn Fisher
D Marilyn Nelson
1769 Lansford Ln.
1696 James Road
707 Decorah Lane
1733 Lansford Ln.
894 Wagon Wheel
PRECINCT NO. 6t Citv Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve
D Marsha Knuth
D Mary Ann Hoyt
R Darlene Misner
D Linda Weinzettel
R Ralph Johnson
740 Mohican
2�76 Apache
706 Ocala
2202 Axtec
1280 Dodd Rd.
452-2108
454-1880
454-3464
454-7194
454-1624
454-7053
454-3432
454-2262
454-6013
457-4233
Captain
Captain
R
R
R
R
D
D
D
ABSENTEE OR ALTERNATE JUDGES
4 ,
- x -
Barb' Carnes 660 S. Freeway Rd.
Charlotte Henry 1965 Knob Road
Sue Guiton 822 Ridge Place
Caroline McDuff 651 S. Freeway Rd.
Pat Burke 707 Decorah Lane
Betty Moen 2319 Swan Drive
Larry Shaughnessy 27 Dorset Road
-�.
452-1643
454-1450
454-1418
454-4504
454-3464
454-7985
457-1100
NOW THEREFORE BE IT�RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights that the preceeding list of candidates are designated
as 1990 Election Judges.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 21st
day of August, 1990
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By .
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
WHEREAS, State Statutes require that appointment of election
judges must be made by City Council resolution; and
WHEREAS, the following list of persons has been submitted as
qualified election judge candidates for the 7���$$� Primary and General
Elections: l��
PRECINCT NO. 1� Somerset School, 1355 Dodd Road
D June Wagner
R Rita Green
D Edwina Burrows
R Salley Countryman
D Eileen Mullen
1392 Farmdale Rd.
1134 Ivy Hill Dr.
681 First Ave.
648 Ivy Falls Dr.
1126 N. Kingsley Ci.
PRECINCT NO. 2� Fire Station, 2121 Dodd Road
D Laurita Weinzettel
D Rita Maczko
R Virginia Simek
R Nancy Kruse
Carol Redding
Hubert Meier
2140 Dodd Rd.
907 Cheri Lane
814 Hazel Court
902 Cheri Lane
2331 Pueblo Lane
795 Keokuk
451-6199
455-5842
457-6658
457-4770
454-6060
454-4659
454-1628
454-6247
454-3854
452-4896
454-2165
PRECINCT NO. 3� Mendota Elementarv School, 1979 Summit Lane
D Jean Fransen
D Mary Hartz
R Cynthia Klecatsky
R Annabel Randolph
2170 Pilot Knob
2200 Pilot Knob
1078 Theresa
541 W. Emerson
Co-Captain
Captain
452-1390 Captain
454-7602
457-3863
i
PRECINCT NO. 4� Henrv Siblev Hiah School, 1897 Delaware
D Marjorie Cheesebrow
D Pat Hetinger
R Theresa Esslinger
D Dolores Radabaugh
R Rosemary Hildebrant
Eileen Rosenbaum
594 W. Marie
658 Callahan Pl.
632 Callahan P1.
653 W. Marie
1783 Delaware
1850 Eagle Ridge Dr.
454-1140 Captain
454-3150
454-1132
454-3190
454-2432 .
452-9689
PRECINCT NO. � Royal Redeemer Luth. Church, 1960 Lexington
R Janan Gainor
D Rosemary Murphy
R Bill Burke
D Ralph Johnson
D Ray Burrows
1769 Lansford Ln.
1696 James Road
707 Decorah Lane
1280 Dodd Road
681 1st Ave.
PRECINCT NO. 6� City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve
D Marsha Knuth
D Mary Ann Hoyt
R Darlene Misner
D Linda Weinzettel
R Marilyn Nelson
740 Mohican
2276 Apache
7D6 Ocala
2202 Axtec
894 Wagon Wheel
452-2108
454-1880
454-3464
457-4233
457-6658
454-7053
454-3432
454-22�62
454-6013
454-1624
Captain
Captain
� NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights that the preceeding list of candidates are designated
as 1990 Election Judges.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 21st
day of August, 1990
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
i 1
� • '4
� �
r
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 16, 1990
To: Mayor, City Council and City Admin s or
From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assista�
Subject: Improvements to Existing Ball Fields
nzscvss=oN
At the August Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the
Commission reviewed the improvements to the existing ball fields
that had been incorporated into the referendum. (See attached memo
from Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander.) �
The Parks and Recreation Commission expressed some concerns
about the proposed outfield fencing at Marie and Valley Park.
These fences were considered for the purpose of keeping balls out
of the ponds, however, the Commission felt that aesthetics were
more important than keeping balls out of the pond and preferred an
open ballfield and park. These two fence items were removed from
any current contracts and were reserved for future Commission
consideration. �
The estimated cost is $24,000 for all the
attached memo. Staff proposes to solicit bids
under the City's purchase order policy, one for
one for the benches and one for the fencing.
RECOMMENDATION
items listed in the
for three contracts
the concrete work,
,
The Parks and Recreation Commission voted �4-0 to recommend
that City Council authorize staff to solicit bids for the desired
improvements to existing ballfields, except for outfield fences at
Marie and Valley parks. ,
ACTION REOIIIRED
Review the proposed improvements to existing ballfields�and,
if the Council wishes to implement the Parks and Recreation
Commission recommendation, pass a motion authorizing staff to
solicit bids for the desired improvements to existing ballfields
for the estimated cost of $24,000 in three separate contracts.
� -�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 14, 1990
TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager
SUBJECT: Improvements to Existing Ball Fields
Referendum funds totaling $63,960 were allocated for
improvements to the existing ball fields in Marie, Valley, Ivy,
Wentworth and Friendly Hills Parks. To date, approximately $15,000
has been spent on a storm sewer in Friendly Hills Parks and City
crews have been grading, leveling and preparing these fields for
additional improvements. City work crew salaries are paid for out
of the regular park budget but costs for ag-lime, topsoil,
equipment rental, etc., is paid for out of referendum funds. This
amount is approximately $6,000 to $7,000 to date.
Terry Blum and I have developed the following list of
improvements which we feel fulfills the expectations of the
Citizens Review Committees desire to "improve existing ball
fields". Estimated cost is $24,000 for all items listed. This
amount also includes engineering, inspections and overhead costs.
1. Friendly Hills Park
- 1- 10' x 12' fence section to both ends of backstop
- 2- 15' aluminum players benches on concrete pads
- Install 8' fence in front of players benches
- 2- 12' high red foul poles
2. Wentworth Park
- 1- 10' x 10' fence section to both ends of backstop
- 2- 15' aluminum players benches on concrete pads
- Install 8' fence in front of players benches
- 2- 12' high red foul poles
3. Marie Park
- 2- 15' aluminum players benches on concrete pads
- Install 8' fence in front of players benches
- 2- 12' high red foul poles
�'' - 'i:
4. Valley Park
- 2- 15' aluminum players benches on concrete pads
- Install 8' fence in front of players benches �
- 2- 12' high red foul poles !
5. Ivy Hills Park
- Install new 10' x 20' x 10' x 10' high backstop,
- 2- 15' aluminum players benches on concrete pads
- Install 8' fence in front of players benches !
- 2'12' high red foul poles ,
ACTION REQIIIRED
Discuss proposed improvement and if the Commission so desires,
they should request the Council to authorize staff to solicit bids
for desired improvements. ',
i
GDK:kkb '
�
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL �
AUGUST 21, 1990
;
General Contractors Licenses ' I
Dahl Systems '
Powers Construction Co., Inc. �
Schaefer Excavation, Inc. �
_ I
Masonrv �
Bruce Dalbec Construction Inc.
Prestige Concrete & Snowplowing Co. ,
August 21, I990
_ - - TO: Mayor and Cit9 CovnciZ
CLA.ZMS LIST SUMMARY»
Total C2aima
$ 192,740.76
Significant Claims
GMH Asphalt Park impro 134,783
MWCC SAC 23,662
St�i*4r:�;..w::t�: . .� .".'i::�ti�S;4i«'ti:.�y,� _,��.:ti}:;.et+ci:t.,`w�.Y :3eU •�.'i:�`'':�iz:z'F`-;�`.t:ti:irr`2�at'c. '.•�?:.+,..w.:>`t:;^�:�c....:;�..;1
flnusnal Claims
BrasZau Air noise 2,524.
Courtyard RecepCion expense 340
Dakota County overpayment recycle 25,249
�� ��rg �9�' 8/21/90 �1a3ms iist
' Fri 7rD:c�T+ AM L•.ity oT Mei�Uc}ta Heightc
7ernp �t+eck 7vsrrnt.�er 1
Temp.
EhecN
Nurnber Verrdai^ Name Rccocrr�t �ade
1 t?arl f' At�cYei^so» tG f-rssc+c ti31 -•44ctiZ+--�'+�0-�c!r
----- - 3 £ar3 � Arrderscn S Frssc�c - -- -- �+9-446�D-¢�fh�-�2+0 - - - - --- --
Tota3s 7cmp CHeck tvuntber 2
Tentp iheck iVurnber •2
•� Fi7':47 t2+1-�i� 9 tZ -4'''�-�-t8
2 Ct7twT Q+9 -'9i?1 ¢+-�t.�t?�-''-�"12�
� fi3&T Tb3-4�4�-@iQ-7tT
s
'f'ata2 s Yemp �f-iecsc tVcrmbei^ ,..
7ernp �heoX Number 3
3 �artcn Rschman �¢�9-.y�,�-¢-�Y�-r��
3
7oCa2s 7emfs IIl�ecH Nurnber 3
Temp �J�eck fVcrmber 4
sr F2 ac3c Hi 2 2 s Rmrnc� �1 -93fC:.r-QL-"Q �=YLr
4
Tcatals Terttp Dt�ecK JVttMbel^ 4
Ternp �»ech Number ;1
:� i=carG c.T LOatet� Carnmiss3arie�^s SS-44:..-:5-313-�Y+
� iaoard aT tntater �ammissia»ei^s ¢�0-v4��-�r¢+¢�-�¢+
:, Raard af Water �atnrnissiariers �1-49;�'✓-31@-:,Y+
2✓
Tc+ta2 s Tenip DfiecH tvirmver �
7emp �Yteck Nurnber 5
6 Prcrosc�r� Instrurner,t Sr-43�-3IDS-Y3
F,
Totais TPm¢ L't�eck iVttmber 6
Temp �hecfc Ntrmber 7
} ? T+avfd Rras2au f}sscc Snc 1E-4•�^+�-tZ+Y+Y+-tB�Z.
i
Tc�taSs 7em�+ Ct�ecH )vumbe�r 7
- - - � _. . - - .
Uept lU-Adm Dept SU-Rd& Bridges
IS-Engr 60-Utilties
20-PoZice 70-Parks fiage ti
30-Fire 80-Planning
40-CEO 85-Recycling
90-Anima2 Control
i
�arnments fimc.urrt
. �
p�,�r.s - -- s`'-'"¢' -
si gns — — -- -- -- --- - 3Y+;=. 9ft --- -- - �---- -- --
-'-----• � �
..s3b. 3TL•
"1
Fiug svc :.r.2i •
_�
f7tfg SYC 3.9E
3>^d qit^ 11.9.:r
�_.__.� �
��. �.a
Re fiarks
�mux�
Ju1y svc
Jcrl y svc
Ju]y svc
]eve2 rad
Re h1asac
3�3. 5E
s�,i. ss
4;?:J, � `Y.
4;=$. : �f[i
y s�. s �
1 +DB. 4%b
3+2s. 8'5
� 35. 4£s
; !
� ?
: t
f ',
; /
27 fiu� �3� �]airns L2st
Fr2 7¢+:L'�r AM �1ty oi' Me��clota t9P1g»ts
Temp �fleck Nc+mber^ 5
'!'emp.
�Y�eck
]Uumber Vendur Name Rcc�.untr �ode
b i"�o2 �»d Law» 9vc 4hY -4333-32:,-3Y�
N
Totals 3emp �hec^k Nurrtber 9
Ta_mp �heck iVumber 9
3 Chepli� fittb]1shlYig. Qi9-45-_`9Yd-iZ�tbr7'-Q�Q1
9
'1'oLa2s Tenrp Ct�ecH JVumtzer 3
Temp itteck Nurnber 1th
1� IIcunmerc2 a] fispJ�al t Q�� -�i�ii�Y.MJ�-JC!
1�
i�C+tc3i5 TPh7�7 �T1LCX 1VUR7bB1^ ifi
Ten1p Ct�eck tJumbei^ 21
12 �cnt2r�entai �ablev2s2c.n �1-�r�12+0-61&�-:.'�
2a �nnti»ei�t�i �atr2evistaio +z+1-•fx.}¢+n.�-f,�+�-3�zr
��
Tc�ta25 Yemp �S-reck Ncrrnber 12
Ten7p �necsc NtlMbet^ l;i
32 Lourtyard fdarr3ctt Q+1-94QY-2ih9-¢9
IL
lata2s ic_nrp IIt�ecx rvumrsc�^ 1t
Ternp Check Nurrtiiet� 13
a3 �c�py Fiup]icat2ng Zro�ucts 7d1-433Y�-44�-�
1�
Tota2s Temp �trec�c 1Ne�mber Z3
Te1np �YrecX Nuinber^ 14
�4 �arr]�an E2ectr3c ��-433�-31�-3Y+
14
Totals 'f�nt¢ �t�eck Num�ier 44
Ten�p EYteck fVuumer 1S
25 �ustam Te�rT 8�9-9333-¢+Y�4i-t�th
�
fiage c
�
r�
�c�rnmerrt s fitmc crrrt
�
Jul y 1 awn cai^e _ 395+. S�¢�- ------- --- ------ -
Y 90. � �:_J
,�
b.td ao �ark sttelter �7�q� �
87. 4 h
r�
m2 x 1 �P9. �t•� ��
1 ic1H. 3;:
C �
i�
fiug svc ;,.3�.
Fiug svc �. �;,
----- r;
�z.�� ..
i�
8J1 eX{ae»se 3frA. �I t .}
34L.3. ;=1
f)
ann2 I!1'�CY�
rprs ra�.ftc�p uri2 ts
sp2ys
193_ �¢4.
� 93. a'�t7�
'TQ+-49
T2+. 44
213. E✓ '
17 Crzrg 299¢+
Fr1 ]�.�'4+ r�M
'remp �nccx ?Vt+nrb2r 2�s
7em�.
�hBC}t
Number^ Ve»c7c�r )Va�ne
2:, �crstom TurT
34�
Tcta2s Ternp �heck 7Vcrrntrer^
7Pmp �hecH ivtrmber 2s
iB �ustam f-'.tr�e r�pparatus
16
Tata2s TP��+¢ L't�eck lvurnber
'fernp �heck NetrnD�r^ 3 i
17 .45a�sgren 917a1�dICW t1ba7'i
1 7 !7a»2 qre�� 9hat^dl aw iJban
39
Totals Terrrp �heck fO�rrnber
7emp �t�eck )Vumber 2£!
19 9aHcta �cunty Tr�eas
�8
Tota3 s 7entp �tieck Mumbet^
Temp �»ecic Nctrnbes^ 13
13 Da»nei^ iar�tlscaping
39
7ata1 s 7erap �her_}c JVermber
Temp Check tvumber ��Qe
�'� �2 r�ys Ser^v] ce
i"Qt
7atals Te»rp �heck 1+tc+mt�er
Temp �heck Nutnbet^ �1
i�S Li)a}i AS�ih82 t L`c.7^¢
2Y flMM Ftsptla2t �at^p
Ac^
Tc.ta] s Tern{s �treck Nurnber^
7BAi(J Ct7LC11 NLIIYlbB1^ c.°.'
L2 £3a2 d 3t ar firt g
�l�ims L25L'
nstiy c�r rne,�octa rresgr,ts
Accc.unt iade
� a--4 333-•'�Z+�'Q�-�4wYr
� J
8+1 -433Ya-diEi2�-3�L
i�
a'�1 -�is�2} -135-5�
t27Y -42L'¢+-•1 � 5-8@
17
Y�1 -3.:s:S3
16
II+1 -43t1t:�-¢+:��-�tZ�
]9
p16-433�.-8�2+P+-12 "Y•
�
a+'3-v4E0-OthY�-2��
2+9-446�-2+�'0-�Z+Y�
21
8i� -43�3-���--�
Fage 3
�ammer�t s Fira�-�u rrL•
- - - - SP�YS - - - - 6c:Y�
Y 7:s. 6�
parLs ��,a9! 33.5:i
13. 3:�
3ul y r^etaiYrer Y � +�rLB. �i2
Jt+ly Re ftatesv.121e 318.73
1 s 7£'E�. 7�
rTd 19�3+L� averPyrnt ;�..�_ �ri�. BYt�
�..=37•�4'3.�
sc.d
{sa rt s
pymt 3 99-5A
pyMt 2 89-f�1-'1
reperzs
3✓. 81�
3�. 8»
1 �^�. 8��+
1 i"��� S+4t
73T ;�64. 35
��T �Y f!, 9:1
1391 783. 34�
1 Y,�. ✓2E
17 r'3ug 435� �lasnfs iis'�
f°r2 1II+:�sY+ RM �City c+f' htentlata l�elghts
Ternp �hecx ivz+rniaer ,^�,?
Ternp.
�»ecx
fVcrmbet^ Vendcr�^ Narn� Accc�trr�t �c�de Cc�rnme»ts
c�
� 7ata2s Yemp �heck Number c2
--- ------ - --- -------- ---
Tem¢ �f7ecH 1Vt+mber s?3
:_^3 Hdwc H�7'r3t 7�S -�Fr��J-YJY�-��i sp2 ys
�s rrowe Ha»k ms-�i�¢+rJ-�z+�;¢�-�c.� spiys
;^3 Hdwe Nal�fr �] -H3Yr�%-03K�-3th sp1 ys
63
7atals Terrtp �YrecH 1Vumber c3
Temp �heck JVtr�nbet� �9
;�ii I � 9 �9-433A-�i9�h-14� capier mtcrt
?4 i O 9 Q+1 -4331Z+-4�9¢.-3�h copl er mtc»
�9 I i� 9 @4 -4��7ff1-��yoh-Eit[� cc+¢1 er mtcn
;'4 Y D J 1Z�1-4332�-49¢+-L'�¢+ caD1�r nttcn
2fi S T? S 8r2 -433rD-498�-3�2 cc.p1 er �irt cn
�9 2 D 9 ffr-H33+A-49¢+-15 capS er mtc�7
;= 4 S fl 8 1�-4331T-49¢�-6P cc pi er mt cn
E4 I D 9 II�3 -499�-�Q'rp2r-Jr2e ca¢2 ei^ mtr_ i�
a sL
Tata] s Temp �neck fdurnber c^9
Tenrp �f�eck Wi�mbei^ '�
L=3 S�MF# 7�1-H44+;='-Y1�-Y� haYrODCok
;�... •
7atals Ternp �f��cH 1Virmber 2�
7emp �heck ]Vurntaer :=E
�b I � M rr � 'F ff+i =:=A7;= �; /;^? payroll
P6 3' � JO R R T �,42 -41 32l-1 1�Y+-12� 7Ji�7 pdy�^a7 2
S:?
Tc�ta2s i'emp �heck Nurnber ;?b
Temp �hecH JVumber �7
�'3 fi11 g�^17n 'C2 »t^s t'�1 -H4Y Q1-tZL�S+-� J ul y dt^y C2 Yrg
�7 •
Tot�2s Tenrp IIf-iecH TVumbcr s�7 .
Ternp �hecH 7verrnber �8
•2s Eugene tSopp �e+2 -433�Z+-43¢�-�Yn rpr sp7r1 r- 1.! n�
�S
fiage H
Rr�n.trrrt
1 tAc. :��
7�. ��
21.94
3. 3fi
ti1. 18
� 5. �+S
cO� �d
,^_8_ �3
�.�_ �.9
P.B. 8�5
�8. Y�8
�s. a+s
2t7. �8
z��i. e�s
19. 3tZt
2 3. 3�
1 ��. 9S
fS4. '!4
c6✓� 3c
189. 1:�
1 S3. 2 :s
31b. �Er -
317�. 0ff
27 Attg 29tJ2e
�t'2 1 �; i�th fiM
7i:mp Dheck Mtmtbel^ 20
Ternp.
ChecH
Murnber Ve»Oc>^ Narne
Tatals T�mp Check fVumber
Temp �heck Nttmber ;..- 3
��3 Thc�nas iSnuth
�9 Thc�mas tti�utri
�=3 7hc�mas ttriutti
:J7
7ota3s 7emp �tteck Number
Tern{s �hecfc Ncrmb�r 3Y+
3Se Hr^echs aTfice MacJ�ines
3fi
Tcrta.ts 'Temp �»eck 7Vcrmber
Temp �Yreck - t0umber 31
32 Med �enter^s N �
32 Med �ei�ters H F
33 f�ed Ce»ters N fi
3s thea �ei�ters rt �
32 Meo �enters N fi
92 M2d �Bl?tre!^S H F`
31 Med �enters H fi
32 Med �el�terS 14 P
39 Med �enters N �
�73
7ata3 s Temp �heck hJzrmber
Semp �hec3r fOzrrnber 3�
32' Met'i[fota He2t�hts Rt�bb35t7•
3'� Jle»data NG2�hD5 RLtbD25Tt'
.12 Merrtlota He3ghts Rubtr3sh'
3� !?e»data tle2ghts Rtrbb]sri"
2 2t1
7�.t325 Temp �ht�cH tvumber
Temp Cher_k Wctmber 33
33 Metro Waste Car�trc�
37 7tlet�^cr Wastre �ct»tral
65
TotaS s 7ernp �Yiec)r JVcrmber
temp Df>eck Jvumber • 34
�Clalnrs L2st
�lty af Me»data He3g»ts
F'tCCCrUY+t �C'�dC Cornmer,ts
� t3 _
29-�91 �-2¢ts-YQ+ pra3ect rn2 s eage
3s-442.:f-•b93-•¢n2r pro,Ject nts 2 eage
8��-441�-1Y�-23 misc m32e��e
c9
4+3 -433tD-99�- 2 �
3�
81= �79
Y+2 -4 2 3 2-1 Y S+-1 t2+
'&�2 -43.31-Y�'�tZ+-��P+
t2� 1-9 Y 3 S-Rr4p+-4�
fi9 -9} 31 -E.'rS�-`S�
tAi -4Y 31 -�7d+-7�
�✓-41 � S -3 8+�-15
F�tI -'433�-�4+�+-rD7+
1 �-49 31 -t2�E@�-62+
31
�21 -4;a9Y+-31 Q�-�ih
�T+1 -4c£fQ+^32 �-T�+
13-4:?5Sk-39 pF-frTh
�T1 -4L�8Qi-32.:�-3tT+
3'�
1:s-+�448-8iE0-6Qi
1:�-3613
33
type r^p:^s
Se�t pr�era
9ept prem
9ep'� prera
5ept prenr
Sepx prem
3ept ��^enr
Sept prem
9ept pi^ern
Jept grem
Jcr1y svc
Su2y svc
Jtr] y svc
Ju2y svc
Jcr2y sac chgs
Ju2y sac ctrgs
FeIIjE ✓
Amount
1 1 J. 9;�
3�'�, 4 't' •
9. 2 2r
] ✓S. 3H
1'�3, QQ+
1;�3. �
7 � 3E('J. �¢
1 � 3ff+4. 6�
:^_� 4 S'2. 53
4.:�7r. tZ+tZ'
9`s7. 4�3
4IIr4� 6�
779. SY+
] gr4. 6�r
4Y�4. 6�
7T 96"J. 9fC
�9. 7E
40. 76
48. 75
9c. 4Y�
18a. 6 tl
13s 8P+4.V. 84F
9 36. t�+¢rc�^
1 3� 66c. ¢+4�
17 f�trg 1J30 �C2a�rns L�st
Fys xm�L�Y,ry FM CSty' OT MEt9dC�tcy NB2{3hIIS
Temp �heck hturnbcr 3A
Temp_
Et�eck
�vz�mtaei^ ve»dc�r hPame Frccc�urrt �c.de �c.mrnents
34 7�72dwest 931^e» Jei^vtce �Z+T--•�r33f+...¢+�h�-EryrZr _, _ -- - Frug mtc�a -- - -
8ti
Tc.ta25 iernp �Yieck Ncrmber 34
7enr� ijhec3r iVumber 3�
:s� 7�f9 ra � flr pt c�i' Reverf�+e �1 -43��^¢+".,¢�-�t� Ju1 y i'ue] tax
�1
Tatal.� i�ntp �tieck Mumber 3�
Temp �Yrecse Nutnb�r 38
..�.6 IVCrt`th 'S't'c�1' L"?7��ti2Y' IL'PC1 QF1-'f141Z+ic+"434�"'H� 8/i?4 It7�fj
ss
Tota25 Temp L't�eclt htumber 3B
Tem{7 �heCK Nutattet` 37
37 Nc.>�therrr 5tate �c�cves� 8+1-9��12^-31�¢+-uri+ firug svc
39 TVcrY�tt7eMl? St�'t� Fcywuer Y+7-4�2�'-•317�-'7'2'+ At�g svc
37 Nc��^thet^r^r St2t� fiuwer^ 2�-4�1�,^-338�-5td Aug svc
37 tvartnern Stc�'t8 fiLrWeJ^ ���ti3i?'^�32�7+^7Y+ Rttt� SVC
37 tac.rthern :3tate ficwer >h1 ^4�11 -3�'fi-•'�'�0 f�arg svc.
«7 Na�^thet^» 9tate: fiawer 1�-•4�71-�4�+Zr-8¢+ Atig svc
:.?z'�
7"c�Y a. 1 5 Tern{a �heck tVtr�nber 3?
Femp �trecH lvcrmGer 39
38 RteYf �ut 8�2-frtr�tL�-�4Yt+-4Y[+ weed cuttlrrg
35
7oL�3S Semp Gttec}t htcsntber 3�
Ternp �»eck lvzrmt�er 39
s9 8 4 3' L�i'tf cc fir�c�dttcts �1-43Lh2t-2r�s-'Mx2 s{sl ys
39 9 tF T 2?TT1cE: fir«cc�cCs t21],�"43�7�t'c+^'Q+'c.''tii-�Z+ sp2y'5
7tt
Tutal� 'S'ernp �t�eck Nurnber 33
Tenrp �Ttecx Y4t.<r�bet^ st�
�+4� 9tr fiatrl Hear^2: L'2 9 Nr3 c fit� a�3 -4�44-tZ�3S+-3�2 Ti r^a Y1 gttter phys3 0�2 s
4m
^1 ot�2 s ,'Fenrp �»ecx svumtuer +'r¢+ .
fiage 6
fimutint
- f�'.?. 4t�+ --
Ec. +}Yh
39. Et2+
39. 6il
� � . 3A
�3. � 3
33. 33�
L 3. :E ?
Y1.7fi
E. 3E�
241.47
3�1lt= 8tt2+
3:�Y�. B�Qh
. .
s7 r";u� s3"� tS;a2rns L15L
FY'1 iti.+.L�Ye FiM C.ity oT Mcl?tlC+t�-T H�1t,31745
i
7ern{s �Tr�ck ;acember ti1
7emp.
�heck
lvirmt�er vencfcn^ fJ7IA� Accc.irnt t:aoe
42 Shade I n fa f7ay Tt^ee Fa�^nrs t'�9^•+s460-•�@-Q�Q+
— 49 Sha�e Irr A Day Tree Fer^rns 8�9-41+6n-�:.v.�-r�in
S.:-
Ta::a]s Tenr¢ Ct�eck 1Vuq��+[:�r q2
Tern¢ �Y,ec:. 1�urnber H�2
4� fl�zrdcn Sx,�erven �1-ar1r�+D-¢�3�-3Yri
�r.^ t3c�rdc�i� :��.•,�.si^ven t2+1-k91✓-•ID3�2t-3m
�4
30Ta. ] s Temp ChecH Nctrn2iel^ 9:�
Temp �hect< '�crmber ��3
47 J L St� 1 e, ny �a t.' 4-4�,'�,�-�.'S.:rA-:r�
f3
Fata2s Tenip �ttecx SVunlber 4:�
7ernp Ct-�eck lVumber k�3
tr9 Snyder Dt^efg Stc�r^e�s 01-H:3rr.-r7+��-�^�
4�i �3ri/tlE'r� D�^trg 9tares ¢+1-43¢�'s-�r24+-��+Z+
a�
Tcta]s 3ernp C:recr ?Vcunber 44
7en�p �f�eck tv�;mf�r:-���� q� •
9'�' 9aV2 d 9u7`Dy Q�2 -�41'4h-2r'..sQ�-:f7r?
+4 ✓
7otaJs Tcmp �fieck lacrmber fi�
Tern�+ �^ia�r•�r }Vumber^ i�8
45 St Pau2 Pcck 4 9Laa2c.nery 2�2-q3Pr3-12fi-1Q+
95
Tota2s 7emp C»Er.k 1Vc+rnber 46
7erAp �heck Nttra2z�1^ ti7
47 StaYe �2re �hief Conf 5+1-448�0-tZ+3Y�-3�+
k7
'ia�.a�s Temp �t�eck tvcrrnbei^ ri7
Tem�� �hEr}r 1Vurnbe�� �45
98 9er» 9a]es 5�1-43�2+:'.-tT:,Q�-gSn
Cc rnmerft s
L:-•E�8 i^enlaval
tree r^ernava2
re2rnb P1t^e cc�nv �xpense
�a�.i 2 e�ge Y1 re c��nv
cl �
Tt7m
T13m
::+.�2ance cicth�»g al2cwar�c
splys
s^err• tlaczko
s pl ys
fiage 7
Arnacrnt
. �
Y 2 tEf. T�T+ '
tt3'?. Sfi - - -- - - - -
.�._�,� ,..}
� 9:'_'. 8+¢. -
G Ji. :�� '?
] 4 �'. [ �Y+ .
397. 99
<!:f. 91
9YLr. 3 _
1:l. 39
L��S. 'L�S
�F 1. G 7
�. 41
.�.�✓. �41
, . � .
' 4 �.
s7 r`,crr3 �_+..�
'f-"t^2 1�.T�:s?n`. At�
�
Temp �f�eck ?tlt+mber +�E+
':' ern p_
IIh ec}c
'Vtf/JJ1]2t' VEridCY` 1QEIfpP.
� ��,
Tat�2s Teu:p L»ecM 1Vcrmbel^
T�rnp '�riec3: Nt.rmber 93
+�i5 9�rr•� tvews��per,s
49 Su�� )a�:wspasi�.>i^s
-43 5crn taewsF+r p�ers
2�`r
'TaL�:s Temp Check Mu�nbe�^
Temp �7•Jeck Number :,�+
�%+z tJ 9 West icmraur,9 cat• t c.r�s
�¢r U 9 We��t �onimu»S ca L 1 o»s
:rQr Lt £t W2st �umrnz�n2 cat 2 c+rrs
J� %} � i�1�E5� IIommui�.t cat 2 a»s
:,�e 21 S West Ee�mrne�rr] cat � o»s
�k*+ U 9 West �omnrcr�oi cat.i a»s
:�1+ U 9 doest �c�mmun] cat 3 arrs
32+ i9 9 LRPst �omnrt����i cat 1 a»s
-� t1 � taest ic�rntnu»2 c�t 2 ans
4.:rE�
7'at�1 s 7r mp �ttecK fVt+utbe�^
•� 978
i3>^and Tcta1
�ia2ms �lst
�2Ly c�f Meirdcta Neigf��s
flCCC•ifT1'� �C:OE
" _- L� __-� .T _'
S+1 -4'24rh-�5'�+-&��
� 9 -•'. P+! �h-�Q+@-�Q�'�
2+1 -4�4Yd-Q�9f2+-64�
it9
ff�1-9i 9 Y�-k'��.�'-'ith
1 :�-41 i �-17+60-�62+
'�+1 •-9:= 2 S+-5:.��-:�P.�
Q+2 -4'c`S 2 2'�- +7 7'k.'�-70
3'+2 -4i?1Y+-318+-2Q+
Q� 1-4i? 1 Q�-t8'c'tn-�2¢+
ff+Y -4�ia'�-0�4�7.+-�i�.'�
ea�-y�1�-1ms-��
1 �-4; 1€�-Q+E0-60
��
fiBgP 0 ^i
Y�
1
L'C4Al17BYt$ 5 fiifflRtl rit
r�
3�. fi�:+
`�}
;��^g nat Neaver 1�.35
��
tr1 d ad �arH sf�e1 ter� 43. f6
hrg nc.t �•c�nl5pec 1;=�99 �.�
63. Ei?
.�
Rug svc 111. Sti � l
r�ug svc 3z4.:'�
Rt�g svc •�8.76
Ftug svc ?r3, 76 ` �
FtUj SVC Si��.BY�
►�ctg svc 34G.:,7
Aug svc ��b. 2� ���
Rug svc 2�2+.rz+�
fiu1 svr �Y+.36
--"'-'---- � -�
4 z 36;_. 99
f}
MANUAL CHECKS 19'�174�. 7E '. )
12764 1,022.10 BFI Rubbish lst&2nd Qtr Recylcing . 1
12765 1,I34.00 IGiutson Rubbi§h " -
12767 600.00 Robert Morin Refund escrow
12768 648.00 Roadway Rubbish 1st&2nd qtr recyc.Zing • �?
12769 457.00 Triange Rubbish "
12770 9,710.00 Mendota Heights Rubbish "
1277Z 52.32 Diane Ward Re: kittenhaZl �
12772 120.00 Jackie O'DonnelZ relief receptionish
12773 3,8I7.32 SCCfI 8/20 payroll deductions
12774 7,688.94 PERA 7/27 payroZl �
12775 12,980.36 Dakota Countg Banlc 8/10 w/h
12776 500.00 " 8/10 payroll deductions
32777 3,069'.88 Comai.ssioner of REvenue 8/10 SIT l. I
12778 ' 37,333.47 Payroll a/c 8/10 net payroll
79,133.39 _ � �
G.T. 271,874.Z5
� � �� �� 1 �
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
,�i •
August 21, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis�t3�i,�`U'r
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: New Park Trailer
DISCUSSION '
One of the two Park Department trailers recently broke down,
and it is so badly rusted and cracked that it will continue to
break down if we repair it and continue to use it. This trailer is
aritical to the smooth operation of the Park Department because it
delivers mowers and other park equipment to the job sites.� We
investigated what it would cost to replace the trailer and found
one that had been prepared for another buyer that had backed out of
the purchase. This trailer is now available at an extremely good
price ($1,250). We received a comparable bid from another supplier
at $2,390 (see attached bids). There is approximatelg $4,500
remaining in the Park Department Capital Equipment Budget line,item
from cost savings on the new Toro Mower and pa�k pickup. '�
--- - ------ ---- - --- ,
Staff recommends that we use $1,250 of the Capital Equipment
Budget moneys from the 1990 Budget, and replace the park trailer at
this time. I
�
ACTION REOIIIRED '
If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation, they
should pass a motion authorizing the City Administrator to sign a
purchase order for the trailer.
JED:kkb
A�� , ' �t
f
. ^ � 4 ,
'� t
�
:;s�;;::;y;:. �.:��.;;:.;,;>>::;. ;:;�:'�::::r:;.;;• .� .. �:?<� ..::i�t;:.
E 9715 Sou#h Robert Trait 1
inver Grove Heights, MN 55075
WQQD e��.: tsiza asZ-Zsss
Hame; (612) 454445$
STOVE oon Tie#�en
Aii claims and returned gaods
���A MUST be aacompanied by this bill. ��"x.�� �i �(%'y�
1.�. l.LL l c,s
�i
:
:,,
. ...,__ ..,............._..
CARLSON TRACTOR S� El�UIPMENT CO.
P.�. BOX 69 � ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55�68 •(612) 423-2Z22
M I N N ES OTA TO LL FREE 800-642-4441 �
To City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria C�.irve
St. Paul, MN 55118
452-1850
"^' ` Piease indicate
this number
8/17/90 when ordering
YOUR INqUIRY DATED TERM:
PROPOSEO SNIPPING DATE O BE
SALESPERSON F.O.B.
Dave Zettervall
PPD. ICOL
HERE IS OUR qUOTATION ON THE GOODS NAMED.SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS NOTED: '
CONDITIONS: The prices and terms on fhis quotation are not subjecf to verbal changes or other agreements unless approved in writing by the Home Office of the Seller
All quotations and agreements are contingent upon strikes, accidents, fires, availability of materials and all other causes beyond our control. Rrices ore based on costs anc
conditions existing on date of quotation ond are subjed to chonge by ihe Seller before final acceptance.
Typographicol and stenographic errors subject to correcfion. Purchaser agrees to accept either overage or shortage not in excess of ten percent to be charged for prarata
Purchaser assumes liability for patent and copyright infringement when goods are made to Purchaser's specifications. When quotation specifies materia) to be furnished by the
purchaser, omple ailowance must be made for reasonable spoilage and material must be of suitable quality to facilitate efficient production.
Conditions not specifically stated herein shall be governed by established trade customs. Terms inconsistent with those stated herein which may appear on Purchasers
formal order will not be binding on the Seller. ,
1 (Redi Haul Trailer, N�del FSLI2LD. Capacity of 5740#,
GVWR of 7820# at 55 MPH. ��; ppped wi.th:
74" x 12' Deck
2-3500# axles w/brakes on all wheels
P/225 x 14 Tires
Oak Deck (2" Nceninal) BOLTID
Full width mesh ramp
2-5/16" Ball ooupler (adjustable)
Swingaway jac7c
4 "D" tie dawn rings
Safety breakaway syst�n
Safety chains
DOT required lights.
With electric brakes
Item 8 PQR113 � Wheeier Group Inc.1983
QUOTE VALID FOR 30 DAYS.
$2,390.00
- � ��1%i,��- - - -
ORIGINAL
TO CONFIRM OROER, SIGN AND RETURN WHITE ACCEPTANCE CC]PY
Mendota Heights Police Department
Memorandum
August 20, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administ
FROM: Dennis J. Delmont, Chief of Police��`-'
SUBJECT: Blue Bell Ice Cream
Historv
i
The Police Department recommended, and Council passed, an ordinance that
regulates the conduct and operation of street and wagon vendors, and door to
door solicitors in the City. .The ordinance requires that those solicitors be
licensed and a daily fee be paid. Mr. Greg Goldman, of Blue Bell Ice Cream,
Inc., has come to the City asking for adjustments, or amendments, to the
ordinance. �
�
i,
Discussion +.
�
Mr. Goldman's primary objection is the $5.00 daily fee required of solicitors.
He claims that his route drivers have a tough time earning enough money to
support themselves as it is, and the $5.00 fee makes the situation worse. I
explained that the reason for the ordinance was not to make money for the
City, but to provide accountability and control over the soliciting problem.
This problem became serious several years ago when a number of "fly by night"
companies flooded the City with sales people for a period of 2-3 days at a
time, and then disappeared until the next year. Mr. Goldman made his case
with me that Blue Bell is a local company that has been in business for quite
some time, and that they are quite careful with the conduct of their sales
people. He further said that he would be present at the Council Meeting to
discuss his request.
1. Leave the ordinance as written. This may well be a financial
burden to Blue Bell Ice Cream, Inc., but it will not be nearly
as bad as those metro cities that completely ban this type of
vending. Our experience with the Solicitor's Ordinance, so far,
has been very good. The number of complaints we receive for
solicitors have dwindled, and the licensing gives us a handle
on the types of solicitations that our citizens object to. I
i
2. Amend the ordinance to allow for lower priced annual licenses,
that would allow a company unli.mited access to the City year;round.
�
, � _ �
� ' ,: �
3. Modify the ordinance to allow for limited annual licenses at a
realistic fee, with specific conditions that would provide the
necessary accountability and control for the protection of
the citizens.
Recommendation
... _ ,, _
That Council direct Staff to amend the ordinance to allow for annual vending
licenses with the following conditions:
1. Licenses will be issued to individuals, not companies or
corporations, and only those specifically licensed individuals
would be allow to solicit in the City. As an example, Blue Bell
Ice Cream would not be issued a blanket license for solicitation,
but Joe Jones, a Blue Bell route driver, would be licensed, and
he would be the only allowed to solicit within the City.
2. That the fee be set at an amount that will realistically defray
some of the administrative, and enforcement, efforts required
of the City. This amount would be in the area of $80-$100 per
year.
3. Licenses be issued for specific days of the week, and times of the
day, in order to preserve the peace, repose, and safety of the
citizens.
4. That any violation of the licensing ordinance, by an employee of
a company, or corporation, would be cause for suspension of all
licenses issued to employees of that corporation, or company,
and that no further licenses be issued until the City had
assurances that repeat violations would not occur.
. � �-.i -.
If Council determines that the ordinance should remain as it is, no action is
required.
If Council feels that alternatives 2 or 3 should be implemented, then a motion
should be made amending the ordinance in that direction.
DJD:cb
-2-
x
°s
� � �
- ���� � r ���j�, ��,�� r���,�,a��,
� }� ��thtc.
321$ Snelling A�•e. Minneapolis, Mti 55406
612- 729-5205
�
%�1�11ut i s �.��C%
T0: Mayor and City Council of Mendota Heights�
FRtJM: �lue Bell I�e �r�am Co.
RE: Gity ordinar►ce pertaining to soliciting and wagon vending
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Recentl.y I met with Palice Chief Delmont to discuss the city
ordinance pertaining io ice cream vending. It had came to my
attentian that the Blue Sell ice cream truck would be considered
a" Wagon Vendor" while operating in the city of Mendota Heights,
The text af the ordinance as gertains to �agon vending appears to
be quite reasanable, however l did bring one concern to the
Chief's at�entian. This concern is about ti�e s�ipulatian that
alI such vendors must pay $5.00 per day.while doing business in
Mendota Heights. After discu�sing the issue raith Chief Delmant,
he recammendeci that i address the council at the August 8th
meeting to request that the city consider requirix�g a seasonal
licence similar in cost and stipulatian to many other Iacal
communitie�. Such communities include Eagan {$75)., West St.Paul
{$50}, and Eden Prairie {$4t�.00)- As suggested by the Chief,
this letter is to inform �Ghe council �hy I have requested a spot
on the agenda and ia give members some time to cansider �he issue
prior to my appearance. �
Such a vending fe�-as currer,tly exists in Mendota Height�
effectively banishes the neighborhood ice cream truck from',
Mendata Heights. Initiaiiy I�ondered why the city might choose
to discourage the neighborhood ice cream truck from being part of
Mendota Height's summer culture. My suspicion was that it c�as
actually er�acted to px~event door-to-door salespeapie from ;
encroaching upon citi2ens" priyacy rather than ta keep outjthe
ice cream truck. � i
� During the past week I have discussed�this issue c�ith several �
council members who indicated to me that there had been pasfi.
•�' groblems �rith daar-ta-door aggressive soiicitatian and that this
ordinance exists primarily to discourage such ac�ivity. The
cauncil members alsa seemed ta feel that there might be some roam
'.. ��or discussion abaut amending the ordinance to make the.proper
licencing for aur ice cream truck affordable. ;•
- ' ,
��� Thank'you for taking time•to read this letter. Blue Bell has
been part of th� summer•community in Mendota Heights for aver six
years and we certainly would like to con�inue to be in the'
�,..�..��. T 7 .....1� 1.,..r�......J �.. �,.,...,.� - _.... ".,... .. t � _ — ------ �
S i ncer�Yyi��,� v'�
� `�r
� Goldman
Greg
� Vending Manager
� a i
4 ' � ,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ''
MEMO
August 15, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini \a r
FROM: James E. Dani so
Public Works ire
SUBJECT: Big Wheel Auto'��ssessment Roll
Job No. 8808 '
Improvement No. 88, Project No. 3 �
DISCUSSION• I
Northland Land Company recently petitioned the City to install
the sanitary sewer and watermain improvements needed to allow con-
struction of the new Big Wheel Auto headquarters. Costs for,the
project were as follows:
�
, Feasibility Estimate = $ 99,800 '
Actual Costs = 152,841
The large difference in actual costs versus estimated were due
largely to the fire marshal requiring that the watermain be looped
under Trunk Highway 13 to increase the water pressure and flow for the
building. Council earlier agreed to fund these looping costs with Tax
Increment Financing funds.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends that the assessment roll be approved as prepared
(see attached). ,
ACTION REOUIRED:
Conduct the required public hearing, staff will be prepared to
answer questions or give a short overview of the project and then if
Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should pass
a motion adopting Resolution No. 90- , RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND
CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR SANITARY SEWER AND WATER IMPROVEMENTS TO
SERVE MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS PARK (BIG WHEEL SITE) AND ADJACENT
AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. 3)
JED:dfw
r ►
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS
FOR SANITARY SEWER AND WATER IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE
MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS PARK (BIG WHEEL SITE) AND
ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. 3)
WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engi-
neer, has calculated the proper amount to be specially assessed
for the costs incurred to date with respect to Improvement No.
8$, Project No. 3 construction of sanitary sewer and water im-
provements to serve the following described property situated in
the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, more
particularly described as follows:
West of Trunk Highway 55, East of Trunk Highway 13, South of
LeMay Avenue and North of future Trunk Highway 13.
WHEREAS, the proposed assessment roll has been on file with the
Clerk and at all times since its filing has been open for public
inspection; and notice thereof has been duly published and mailed
as required by law. Said notice stated the date, time and place
of such meeting; the general nature of the improvement; the area
proposed to be assessed; that the proposed assessment roll has
been on file with the Clerk; and that written or oral objections
thereto by any property owner would be considered; and
WHEREAS, said hearing was held at 7:45 o'clock P.M. or as soon as
possible thereafter on Tuesday, August 21, 1990, at the City Hall
in the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor announced that the hearing was open for the
consideration of objections, if any, to said proposed assess-
ments; and .
WHEREAS, all persons present were then given an opportunity to
present oral objections, and all written objections theretofore
filed with the Clerk were presented and considered.
NOW THEREFORE, this Council, having heard and considered all
objections so presented, and being fully advised in the premises,
and having made all necessary adjustments and corrections, finds
that each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumberated in
the proposed assessment roll was and is specially benefited by
the construction of said improvements in not less than the amount
of the assessment, set opposite the description of each such lot,
piece and parcel of land, respectively, and that such amount so
set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots,
pieces and parcels of land therein described; and
:�
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proposed assessment roll is'
hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper special assessment for
each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land respectively, and
the assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the
rate of eight percent (8�) per annum accruing on the full amount
thereof from time to time unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with
general taxes upon such parcel and all thereof. The total amount
of each such assessment as to sanitary sewers, storm sewers, and
watermains shall be payable in equal amounts extending over a
period of nineteen (19) years and each assessment as to streets,
curb and gutter shall be payable in equal amounts extending over
a period of ten (10) years; the first of said installments,
together with interest on the entire assessment commencing thirty
(30) days from the date hereof to December 31, 1990, to be pay-
able with general taxes for the year 1990, collectible in 1991
(now designated as real estate taxes payable in 1991), and one of
each of the remaining in stallments, together with one year's
interest on that and all other unpaid installments, to be payable
with general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter until the
entire assessment is paid; and '
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that prior to September 21, 1990, the
owner of any lot, piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may at
any time pay the whole of such assessment, without interest to
the City Treasurer; and ,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall prepare and transmit
to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of said assessment
roll with each then unpaid installment and interest set forth
separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the
County, and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said
assessments in the manner provided by law.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this
21st day of August, 1990.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By '
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
�
MJJL..�.i� ���.. . .�.. � � �
Sanitary Sewers - 19 years
Watermains - 19 years
Storm Sewers - 19 years
Streets - 10 years
Interest - g$
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND
N0. DESCRIPTION
27-03300- Northland Land Company
013-03 3500 80th Street W. #100
Bloomington, MN 55431
�
ASSESSMENT ROLL
BIG WHEEL AUTO SITE
IMPROVEMENT N0. 88-3
JOB N0. 8809
ADOPTED:
SUBDIVISION
Section 33 Twn 28 Range 23
SE 1/4 ofi NE 1/4 Ly N of
RR & SW'ly ofi a line Beg
31.93 Ft W ofi NE Cor Lot 1
Blk b Gardenville Rearr SW
on Cur Ang 8D23M6S 158.48 fit
S 11DSM3S bl 121.33 Ft. Defi L
on Tang Cur Ang 24D17M59S
468.53 Ft S 64D30M3S W
154.8 Ft L on Tang Cur Rad
1350.9 Ft to Int RR & There
Term Ex W 349 Ft Ex E 209
Ft of W 556 Ft of N 455.6
Ft & Ex N 150 Ft ofi E 301 Ft.
LOT BLK SANITARY WATER
N0. N0. SEWERS MAINS
TOTAL
Assessed amounts determined on a
lineal foot basis but distributed
to previously unassessed parcels,
on a square footage basie, within
three designated areas (see file).
-- -- $4,960.81 $6,392.56 $11,353.3,7
W
N0. DF�^RIPTION
27-03300- Nor_ .d Land Company
022-02 3500 80th Street W. H100
Hloomington, MN 55431
27-03300- Northland Land Company
022-01 3500 80th Street W. il100
Bloomington, MN 55431
27-03300- Northland Land Company
030-01 3500 80th Street W. tt100
8loomington, MN 55431
Section 33 Twn 28 Range 23
Pt ofi E 209 Ft of W 558 Ft
of N 455.6 Ft of SE 1/4 ofi
NE 1/4 Ly NW'ly of a line
Beg 31.93 ft W ofi NE cor Lot 1
Block 6 Gardenville Rearr SW
on Cur Ang 8D23M6S 158.48
Ft S 11DSM3S W 121.33 Ft
Defi L on Tan Cur A�g 24D17M59S ,�
468.53 Ft S 64D30M3S W 154.83 Ft.
l on Tan Cur Rad 1350.92 Ft
to Int W of Line 6 There Term
Sectio� 33 Twn 28 Range 23
W 150 fit ofi N 230 Ft & S
100 Ft ofi E 3 Acs ofi S 20
Rds of NE 1/4 of NE 1/4 Ly
W'ly of a line Heg 31.93 Ft
W ofi NE Cor Lot 1 Hlk b
Gardenville Rearr SW on Cur
Ang 8D23M6S 158.48 Ft S 11D
5M3S W 121.33 Ft Def L on
Tang Cur Ang 24D17M59S
468.53 fit S 64D30M3S W
154.83 Ft L on Tang Cur Rad
1350.92 Ft to Int S Line
NE 1/4 of NE 1/9 & There
Term.
Section 33 Twn 28 Range 23
E350FtofiW7AofS20
Rods of NE 1/4 •of NE 1/4
`J0. N0. SEWERS MAINS
-- -- 53,819.35 f4�921.bb
58,741.01
-- -- 52,430.50 83,131.97 i5,562.47
-- -- 55,012.90 f6�459.b8 f11,472.58
.r"'
t
N0. DESCRIPTION
2�-03300- Northland Land Company
012-01 350fl SOth Street W. #i0fl
Blnominqtan, MN 55431
27-48270- Triple S. Investments
010-01 230d Pi2ot Krtob Raad
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-71250- Northland Land Company
091-4! 359U 84th Streei W. #iQ0
Bloomington, MN 55431
27-71254- North2and Land Gompany
151-Oi 3500 80th Street W. #100
eloomington� MN 55431
27-71250- Northland Land Company
lbl-81 3500 8�th S#reet #J. #144
Bloomingto�, MN 55431
�
Section 33 7wn 28 Range 23
Pt af E 24b Ft af N 230 Ft
of E 3 acs of 5 20 Rds o4
NE 1/4 of NE 1/4 Ly W'ly
of a line Beq 31.93 ft W
ofi NE Cor Lot 1 Blk b
Gardenville Rearr SW an
Cur Rng $D23M6S 158.48 -ft.
S 11DSM3S W 121.33 Ft Def L
on Tang Cur Rng 24D17M59S
ta Int 5 Li�e
i�endota Neights Basiness
Fark
South Lanes
Pt af �ots 8& 4, Blk 1&
Vac LeMay Rve Adj Ly E'Iy
of a Line Com 22.86 ft E ofi
N4f Gar lot $ Bik 1 S 4B
39M41S E 104.43 ft 5 29b.56
F# Sw on Tang Cur Rad
1248.42 Ft W�ine of Sect &
7here terminating.
South lanes
Lots 2 thru 7 dc lots 10
Thru 15 Hlk 1& Vac l.eMay
t�ve Adj
South Lanes
lots 1& 16 Bik i& Vat
LeMay Ave Adj
�
N0. N0. SE�ERS �AINS
-- -- 51�128.4R Sl�Q54.13
52,582.57
1 1 f9r158.44 �19,?b2.04 S28T924.44
-- -- $169.92 �274.98 5449.90
-- -- 32,Q14.44 S3,2tr7.36 i5,28b,3b
-- -- 3339.83 5549.98 f869.81
�4
'L
aio• "��t,�z�tioN
27-71250- NG. .and Land Company
083-02 3504 80th Street W. E1100
Bioomington, MN 55431
27-?1250- Northland Land Company
132-42 3544 80th Street Id. N1U0
Bloamingtan, MN 55431
27-fi1254- htortfiland Land Campany
144-02 3500 80th Street W. t1100
82oomington, MN 55431
South Lanes
Pt o# �ots 7& 8 Sik 2&
Vac LeMay Avenue & Dean 5t adj
Ly E'ly of a �ine Com 22.86
ft E of NW Car lai 8 Blk 1
S 4A39M41S E 104.93 fit S
296.56 Ft Sw of Tang Cur
Rad 124$.42 Ft to Ut line
of Sec & There Term Ex Pt
Platied as Mendota Hei9hts
8usiness Park
South Lanes
lots 2 tfiru h& lats 9 thru
thru 13 Hlk 2& Vac LeMay
Ave & Dean St adj Ex Pt
Platted as t7endota Heights
Business Park
South lanes
Pt ofi Lat 1& 14 Blk 2
& Vac LeCiay Ave & Aean St
Ad Ly W'iy af a �ine
Com SE Cor Lot 15 Hlk 1 S
on 5'ly Ext of E Line
Lot 15 to td'iy RJW STii 13
& There 7erm Ex Pt
Piatted as Mendota Neigh#s
Business Park
�..�. w�.�. r��.....��.. w�t�Li\ ItJIHL
N0. lVO. SEGIERS 11AIt�S
-- -- 5199.90 f323.50 5523.40
-- -- S1T349.48 s2,193.63 33,533.11
-- -- f259.87 SA20.55 5680.42
t
;�
t ,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 17, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini
FROM: James E. Daniels
Public Works Di c
SUBJECT: Alice Lane Asse sment Roll
Job No. 8911
Improvement No. 89, Project No. 3
DISCUSSION•
Assessments for this project came in slightly above the feasi�il-
ity estimate and staff has not received any contacts from the affected
property owners since mailing out the public notices.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends that Council approve the assessment roll as
prepared.
ACTION REQUIRED•
Conduct the required public hearing, staff will be prepared to
answer questions and/or give a short introduction of the project and
then if Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they
should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 90- , RESOLUTION
ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR SANITARY SEWER AND WATER
IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE ALICE LANE ADDITION AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVE-
MENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 3)
JED:dfw
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS
FOR SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER, STREETS
AND CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE
ALICE LANE ADDITION AND ADJACENT AREAS
(IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 3)
WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engi-
neer, has calculated the proper amount to be specially assessed
for the costs incurred to date with respect to Improvement No.
89, Project No. 3 construction of sewer, water storm sewer,
streets and curb and gutter improvements to serve the following
described property situated in the City of Mendota Heights,
Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows:
Alice Lane Addition, Lot 34, Block 1, and Lot 1, Block 2,
Eide Estates, Parcel No. 27-03500-061-01 and Parcel No. 27-
03500-040-01.
WHEREAS, the proposed assessment roll has been on file with the
Clerk and at all times since its filing has been open for public
inspection; and notice thereof has been duly published and mailed
as required by law. Said notice stated the date, time and place
of such meeting; the general nature of the improvement; the area
proposed to be assessed; that the proposed assessment roll has
been on file with the Clerk; and that written or oral objections
thereto by any property owner would be considered; and
WHEREAS, said hearing was held at 7:45 o'clock P.M. or as soon as
possible thereafter on Tuesday, August 21, 1990, at the City Hall
in the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor announced that the hearing was open for the
consideration of objections, if any, to said proposed assess-
ments; and
WHEREAS, all persons present were then given an opportunity to
present oral objections, and all written objections theretofore
filed with the Clerk were presented and considered.
NOW THEREFORE, this Council, having heard and considered all
objections so presented, and being fully advised in the premises,
and having made all necessary adjustments and corrections, finds
that each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumberated in
the proposed assessment roll was and is specially benefited by
the construction of said improvements in not less than the amount
of the assessment, set opposite the description of each such lot,
piece and parcel of land, respectively, and that such amount so
set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots,
pieces and parcels of land therein described; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proposed assessment roll is�
hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper special assessment for
each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land respectively, and
the assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the
rate of eight percent (80) per annum accruing on the full amount
thereof from time to time unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent'with
general taxes upon such parcel and all thereof. The total amount
of each such assessment as to sanitary sewers, storm sewers, and
watermains shall be payable in equal amounts extending over a
period of nineteen (19) years and each assessment as to streets,
curb and gutter shall be payable in equal amounts extending over
a period of ten (10) years; the first of said installments,
together with interest on the entire assessment commencing thirty
(30) days from the date hereof to December 31, 1990, to be pay-
able with general taxes for the year 1990, collectible in 1991
(now designated as real estate taxes payable in 1991), and one of
each of the remaining in stallments, together with one year's
interest on that and all other unpaid installments, to be payable
with general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter until the
entire assessment is paid; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that prior to September 21, 1990, the
owner of any lot, piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may at
any time pay the whole of such assessment, without interest to
the City Treasurer; and �
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall prepare and transmit
to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of said assessment
roll with each then unpaid installment and interest set forth�
separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the i
County, and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said ',
assessments in the manner provided by law. ,
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this
21st day of August, 1990.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor,
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
'''• ASSESSMENI OD
` Sanitary 5e..�rs - 19 years
Watermains - 14 years
y Siorm Sewers - 19 years
$tY@Et5 " SO Y@dY5
Interest - 8�
CITY OF MENDO7A HEIGHTS
A5SESSMENT ROLL
AI.ICE E.ANE
IMPROVEMEN7 N0. 89-3
JOB N0. 8911
AD4Pi'EB:
PARCEL REPUTED Ot�NER AND SUHDIVTfiI0t3
NU. dESCRIP7I0N
27-035Q9- Fau2 & Denise M. Sazama Section 35� Twn 28 Range 23
061-01 225f Dodd Road Pt of NE I/4 of NE 1/4 of NE 1/4
Mendata Heights� MN 55120 Beg. 450 Ft S of NE Cor S
210 Pt W 272 Ft N 210 Ft
E tn Beg SubJ to TH 99
27-03500- George & Yvonne Gangl Section 35 7an 28 Range 23
440-OI 222� Dodd Road S i35 Ft of N�{50 Ft of E
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 300 Ft of N 1/2 of NE 1/9
27-233b5- John K& Lisa J. Dmodt fide Estates
390-01 59 Logan Avenue West
West St. paul, MN 55118
27-23365- Vernon M. & Alice L. Eide Eide Estates
010-02 7200 Cahill Road H2O3
£dina, CiN 55935
27-11250- Blesener Builders, Inc. Alice Lane Subdivision
010-41 l8i5 Twin Circle Drive
Mendata Heightsy MN 55118
.?. 27-11250- Blesener Builders� Inc. Aiice iane Subdivision
020-Q1 1815 Twin Circle Drive
17endata Heights, MN 55118
27-11250- John K. & Mary S. Hood Alice Lane Subdivision
010-02 1479 l.aurel
St. Paul, C3N 55144
27-1i250- Blesener Builders, Inc. Alice Lane 5ubdivision
424-42 2815 Twin Circle Drive
Mendota Heights� MN 55118
l0i BIK. SRNITARY & WATER &
N0. N0. SERVICE SERVICE
-- -- f3,?31.65 f.d0
n��na5»t.tri• nx'a'ks
Alice Iane & Eide Estates
Sanitary & Sezvice - $2,639.35 per lat
Water & Serviae 2,Z03.0$ per lot �
Stoxm 5ewezs - 1,224.6T per loY
Streots - 3,628,69 per lat
Grading - 5,852.06 per lot
others
Sanitary & Service - 53,731,65 per lot
S7DRM STREETS GRADING
SEWERS
S.QO 5.04 f.40
TOTAL
53,731.b5
-- -- . i3,73i.d5 5.00 5.00 S.OQ f,QO 53�731.b5
34 1 f2,b39.35 f2,103.08 f1,224.67 #3,628.69 55,852.06 f15,447.85
i
1
2
1
2
2 52,639.35 'f2,103.08 fi,224.67 f3,628.69 f5,852.06 f15�447.85
i f2,639.35 52,243.Q8 $1,229.6J 53,d2$.69 f5,852.Ob 515,4Q7.85
F 52,634.35 52,103.0$ f1,224.67 #3,62$.69 f5�$52.06 f15,447.85
2 42,639.35 32�103.08 51,22Q.E+7 53,628.69 #5,852.06
2 f2,b39.35 f2,103.08 f1,229.b7 S3,b28.b4 55,852.Ob
f15�p47.85
f35�4Q7.85
�- ' +
MEMO
August 17, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini t
FROM: James E. Da ' o
Public Work D' or
SUBJECT: Ivy Falls Creek Assessment Roll
Job No. 8704
Improvement No. 87, Project No. 2
DISCUSSION•
Assessments for this project all came in below the feasibility
estimate and staff has not received any contacts from the affected
property owners. '�
RECOMMENDATION: ,
Staff recommends that Council approve the assessment roll as
prepared.
ACTION REQUIRED•
Conduct the required public hearing, staff will be prepared to
answer questions and/or give a short introduction of the project and
then if Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they
should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 90- , RESOLUTION
ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR SANITARY SEWER AND WATER�
IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE IVY FALLS CREEK ADDITION AND ADJACENT AREAS
(IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO. 4) i
JED:dfw
r -�
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS
FOR SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER, STREETS
AND CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE
IVY FALLS CREEK ADDITION AND ADJACENT AREAS
(IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO. 2)
WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engi-
neer, has calculated the proper amount to be specially assessed
for the costs incurred to date with respect to Improvement No.
87, Project No. 2 construction of sewer, water storm sewer,
streets and curb and gutter improvements to serve the following
described property situated in the City of Mendota Heights,
Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows:
All lots in ivy Falls Creek Addition and Lots 2 through 6,
Lots 11-16, Block 2, Lots 1-6, Block 5, Lots 6-9, Block 6,
and Lot 16, Block 10 of T.T. Smith's Subdivision No. 3.
WHEREAS, the proposed assessment roll has been on file with the
Clerk and at all times since its filing has been open for public
inspection; and notice thereof has been duly published and mailed
as required by law. Said notice stated the date, time and place
of such meeting; the general nature of the improvement; the area
proposed to be assessed; that the proposed assessment roll has
been on file with the Clerk; and that written or oral objections
thereto by any property owner would be considered; and
WHEREAS, said hearing was held at 7:45 o'clock P.M. or as soon as
possible thereafter on Tuesday, August 21, 1990, at the City Hall
in the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor announced that the hearing was open for the
consideration of objections, if any, to said proposed assess-
ments; and
WHEREAS, all persons present were then given an opportunity to
present oral objections, and all written objections theretofore
filed with the Clerk were presented and considered.
NOW THEREFORE, this Council, having heard and considered all
objections so presented, and being fully advised in the premises,
and having made all necessary adjustments and corrections, finds
that each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumberated in
the proposed assessment roll was and is specially benefited by
the construction of said improvements in not less than the amount
of the assessment, set opposite the description of each such lot,
piece and parcel of land, respectively, and that such amount so
set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots,
pieces and parcels of land therein described; and
�
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proposed assessment roll is '
hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper special assessment for
each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land respectively, and
the assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the
rate of eight percent (8�) per annum accruing on the full amount
thereof from time to time unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with
general taxes upon such parcel and all thereof. The total amount
of each such assessment as to sanitary sewers, storm sewers, and
watermains shall be payable in equal amounts extending over a
period of nineteen (19) years and each assessment as to streets,
curb and gutter shall be payable in equal amounts extending over
a period of ten (10) years; the first of said installments,
together with interest on the entire assessment commencing thirty
(30) days from the date hereof to December 31, 1990, to be pay-
able with general taxes for the year 1990, collectible in 1991
(now designated as real estate taxes payable in 1991), and one of
each of the remaining in stallments, together with one year's
interest on that and all other unpaid installments, to be payable
with general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter until the
entire assessment is paid; and ,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that prior to September 21, 1990, the
owner of any lot, piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may at
any time pay the whole of such assessment, without interest to
the City Treasurer; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall prepare and transmit
to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of said assessment
roll with each then unpaid installment and interest set forth
separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the
County, and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said,
assessments in the manner provided by law.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this
21st day of August, 1990.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS !
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
ASSESSMENT PERibD
Sani#ary Sewers - 14 years
Wa#ermains - 19 yearg
S#or+� Sewers - 19 years
Streets - 14 years
Interest 8�
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND
N0. DESCRIPTIflN
27-3�625- 7hoa�as & Barbara Krawczersk
OIO-01 44 Acker Stree# £ast
5t. Paul, MN 55117
27-37d25- Heaver D�veiop Inc.
020-01 David L. Casper
1130 S�nith Avenue S.
�leat St. paul, MN 55228
2�-37625- Heaver Develop Tnc.
034-42 David !.. Casper
1130 Sa�ith Avenue S.
West St. Paul� MN 55119
27-37625- Heaver Develop Inc.
040-01 David L. Casper
1130 Sa�ith Avenue 3.
West St. Paul, MN 55118
27-37b25- Heaver Develop Inc.
010-02 Davfd I.. Casper
2130 Sr�ith Avenue S.
West St. Paul, MN S5l18
27-37d25- Neaver Dave2op Int.
020-02 David L. Casper
113p Smith Avenue S.
btest St. Paui, MN 55118
27-37625- Heaver Develop Inc.
034-42 David L. Casper
1134 Smith Avenue S.
West S#. Paul� MN 551i8
CIiY QF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ��5� ��
Ivy Falle Creek T.T. Smitha Sub. No. 3
RSSESSMENt ROLk. san. servica - Ssez.95 ger a,ot Sanitary 8ervica - $1,379.ss �r ioe
IVY FALLS CREEK ADDITION watasmat.n & Scrvico - 52,402.66 pex iot watermain B Sarvica - 2r996.96 per iot
IMARDVE�tEF1T ND. S%-2 Stre�t - $4,246.21 per lot Straet a Gradtng (566.173 per ft.)
JE1H N0. 8�Q4 storm sewer - Sa.siz.88 per lot - 7,940.76 per iot
3toxm Sewars = 50.899 P�' aq. ft.
ADOPTED:
SUHDIVISION LOT BLK SANITARY WA7ER STREETS STDRM TOTAL
ND. N0. SEWERS MAIFtS SEWERS
Ivy Falls Creek Addition 1 1 S8G2.95 S2,Q02.66 f4,246.21 44�512.89 512,024.70
Ivy Fa12s Creek Addition
Ivy Falls Creek Addition
Ivy Falls Creek Addition
Ivy Falis Greek Addition
Ivy �alls Creek Addition
Ivy Fells Creek Addition
2 1 LB62.95 f2�482.b6 f4,2Ab.21 54�512.9$ 512,424«70
3 1 f8b2.95 52�402.66 54�246.21 f4�512.88 f12,024.70
9 1 5862.95 i2�402.6b fQ,2Ab.21 f4�512.88 f12�024,74
1 2 t8fi2.95 S2lA02.6b 54,24b.22 t4,512.88 312,024.70
2 2 S8b2.95 S2,q02.65 S4,2A6.21 f4,512.88 fi2,024.70
3 2 5862.95 S2yA02.bb 49,246.21 54,512.88 f12,024.70
J
PARCEL REPtlT£D OWt+tER AND
N0. DESCRIPTION
27-3?b25- Char2es E. & Judith M. Golla
040-02 2176 Wellesley Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55105
27-37625- Neaver Develop Inc,
454-02 David l. Casper
1130 Sa�ith Avenue S.
West St. Paul, MN 55118
27-37625- Heaver Develop Inc.
060-02 David L. Casper
1i30 Ssiih Avenue S.
West St. Paul, MN 55118
27-b4702- Dennis J. & Nancy Stevens
121-02 2935 Mest Service Road
Eagan, MN 55121
27-69702- Gregory J& Patricia Rnedle
140-02 Rodney D. Ives
Ti�nothy J. Mtl9aaus
1912 Goodrich Avenue
St. Paul� MN 55105
27-b9702- Ti�nothy J. McManus
162-02 665 Hrookside Lane
Merrdoia Neigbts, E�N 55i18
27-69702- Warren J. �r. & Joan Robinson
024-OS 23�5 Eaura
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
27-b9702- Rober# & tlarjarYe Lfcha
041-�5 b99 lat Avenue
- -- - --- Mendota Heightsy MN-- S5118
27-69762- Tho�as & Margaret Blu�
110-OS 649 ist Avenue
�iendoia Heights, MN SSli8
27-b9702- Robert J. & Diane M. Sullwold
130-45 MQhdota Fteig�its, �IN SS218
SUBDIVISIQN
Ivy Falls Creek Addition
Ivy Falls Greek Additian
Ivy Falls Creek Addition
Smi#h T.T. Subdivision Na. 3
Lots 5�6,11 & 12 Blk 2
Smith T.T. Subdivision No. 3
Lots 3,4,13 !k 14y Blk 2
Smith T.T. Subdivision No. 3
Lots 1�2, 15 & 16� Block 2
Smith T.T. Subdivision No. 3
Lots i& 2� Black 5
Sa�ith T,T. Subdivision No. 3
Lots 3& 4, Hlock 5
Smith T.T. &ubdivision tdo. 3
All of Lot b Blk S and all
at tot ii, Black S
Smith T.T. Subdivision Na. 3
Lo# 12�lBloc�C 52&�W �4Aft ai
Lot 13, Block 5
�
LUT $LK SANITARY WATER STREETS STORM TOTAL
N0. N0. SEWERS MAINS SEWERS
4 2 SSb2.95 f2�402.bb f4�24b.21 54�512.88 512�029.7d
5 2 f862,45 S2i402.b6 S4t296.21 f4l512.88 S12�fl24.70
6 2 f862.95 S2lA02.66 S4,2Q6.21 54,512.86 f12,024.70
-- -- 52,379.55 S2y976.9b f7�948.7b f3�2b7.b� 515,504.44
-- -- f1,379.55 52�976.96 57,940.76 f3�207.b7 f15�509.94
-- -- #1�379.55 f2�976.96 57�940.76 S3}207.67 515�504.94
-- -- f.00 5.00 51�495.00 f1�965.19 53�470.19
-- -- 52�374.55 52�47b.96 f7�944.?b #i„485.04 f13,782,27
-- -- 5689.76 t1aA86.49 f3�970.38 #742.50 f6,891.12
-- -- 5669.7G fl}Q88.48 f3,9�0.38 5742.50 56,891,12
"�z
4
•
i
:.��,�,;
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 15, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admi i r
FROM: James E. Dani
Public Works Dir
SUBJECT: Mel Swanson C plaint
Mendota Heights - Sibley Complex
Job No. 8920F
Improvement No. 89, Project No. 6F
DISCUSSION•
Mr. Melvin Swanson, 1778 Ridgewood Drive, lives adjacent to
a City drainage way that carries a portion of the drainage from
the new Sibley Park (see attached map). After some heavy rains
in July Mr. Swanson noticed an increase in the runoff and sent
the attached letter. Mr. Swanson also attended the August 7th
City Council meeting to discuss his letter and Council directed staff
to prepare a response for the August 21st meeting. '
In his letter Mr. Swanson cites three City storm water
objectives that he claims are not being met;
1.
2.
The rate of surface water runoff will be greatly in-
creased. �
Citv Response•
Staff has completed a before and after analysis of the
runoff calculations for this area and we find that they are
virtually identical. While completing the calculations we
noticed that the runoff coefficient for bare ground is
double what it would be for a grassed area which we feel
accounts for the extra runoff during the July storms, and
why Mr. Swanson noticed the runoff to be greatly increased.
The project eliminates an existing retention pond for
run off. Additional retention ponding should be built.
Citv Response•
There was an existing detention pond (it had an outlet
and was drained). Because the park will be a very flat
grassy area with little imperious area staff sees no
need to construct a detention or retention pond for�the
storm water. �
I
(
� J ) �
3. The other communities
been informed of the
proj ect .
Citv Response•
in the Watershed Plan have not
changes in water runoff from this
This drainage in no way affects another community
therefore there is no need to inform them.
In his letter Mr. Swanson also states that he believes this
construction also greatly increases the likelihood of the City having
to install a new storm sewer system that he would be assessed for.
There is ample capacity within the drainage ditch by his home and
further downstream to handle any increased runoff from the Sibley Park
construction. No new storm sewer construction is planned for now or
in the immediate future in this area. Note: Mr. Swanson's back yard
goes into a wetland area and this year has been a wetter than normal
year therefore the water levels are much higher.
Copies of this memo have been forwarded to Mr. Swanson and
Mrs. Naren Bauer, the two individuals who attended the last City
Council meeting to present their complaint.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Review the letter and staff's response with the complainants
and give staff direction on any new action to be taken.
JED: dfw
-.�. -.,_�„- `'� _
"' -::�..
..� ...� - - -
August 1, 1990
Members of the Mendota Heights City Council
Dear Members,
Mendota Heights is currently constructing baseball diamonds on '
the Southwest corner of Marie and Delaware Avenues. I believe
this project fails to comply with the majority of the objectives,
(rules/regulations) of the Lower Mississippi Watershed Mangement;
Plan. Mendota Heights is a member of this organization and has
agreed to comply with the Watershed Plan.
Some of the objectives that are not being followed are:
1. The rate of surface water run-off w�ll be g�eatly increased.l
2. The project eliminates an existing retention pond for
run-off. Additional retention ponding should be built.
3. The other communities in the Watershed Plan have not been �
informed of the changes in water run-off from this project.
In addition to damaging the environment from the present plans �
for handling the surface water run-off from the baseball �
diamonds, I believe we are greatly increasing the probability of�
Mendota Heights having to install a storm sewer system. The tax'
burden for a storm sewer system will be substantial. ,
In the past, complying with the plans of a watershed area has �
been difficult to enforce. I believe this year the State
Legislature has given the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil �'
Resources the authority to participate in the solution to any '
grievance that is brought against a community for not complying '�
with the Watershed Plan for their area. ;
The reason for this letter is to assure that you are aware of the
potential problems and tax burden that Mendota Heights may incure
for not following the Watershed Plan in construction of the
baseball diamonds. Timing is important, the project is still in
the construction stage. .
Sincerely,
� : ���� '-' � ,"
. . . , 'V uy v -�-�jY`�
Melvin H. Swanson
1778 Ridgewood Drive
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118
0
• . �.
;., _ , . .
.
5:
� � ` : �,;
i
TO:
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 17, 1990
Mayor and City Council �
������.�.-�'
Tom Lawell, City Admini a r ��.,e�
SUBJECT: Consideration of Comfort Station Bid
niscussiorr
On August 17, 1990 bids were received f
Comfort Station Shelter. As you may recall, '
bid opening associated with this project due t
initial bids were rejected as being consider
estimate. The bid tabulation sheet for the se �� 1 �'
attached for your review. �
As you can see, our bids for this proj ec� d��, Zp`� , � Z�� i
are not yet below the anticipated $50,000 cost
the proj ect, Mr. Ed Kodet, indicates that the bui in - as b�ra �xs-a- I
basic bare bones structure with little or no frills. For this
reason, it is quiet difficult to subtract any additional elements
from the building without adversely affecting the ability of the
building to meet our basi�.functional needs.
As part of the recent bid package, a deduct alternate was
included regarding the basic roof structure of the building.
Attached to this memo please find several drawings which portray
the comfort station with two separate roof styles. The base bid
includes a roof line with significant overhang, while the deduct
would eliminate the overhang completely. �
Mr. Kodet has been invited to attend our upcoming Council
meeting to review the results of the bid opening and any future
options available to us. ,
ACTION REOIIIRED
Discuss with Mr. Kodet the results of the bid opening, and
decide whether to accept the apparent low bid from Morcon
Construction, or to reject all bids. Should the Council decide to
reject all bids, direction should be provided to redesign the
building in some fashion, or to abandon the project until a later
date.
MTL:kkb
0
SIBLEY PARK SHELTER
City of Mendota Heights
BID TABULATION
, ;,
August 17, i 990
ADD ' ADD ' ADD DEpUCT
ADD ALT. #2 ADD ALT. #4 ALT. #5 AI.T. #6
AIT. #1 ROCK FACE ALT. #3 ST. STEEL r LIGH7 ROOF CALENDER BID
CONTRACTOR BASE BID BRICK BLOCK EXT. OUTLETS COUNT�RTOP FIXTURES STRUCTURE ADDENDUM DAYS BOND
Meisinger ConstructIon 64 fQ5Q 7,45Q 37Q 1,46Q 1,480 4r15Q 3,535 X 60 X
Kent W. Jeffersan Cansiruc#ion �g rg�� 7,4C�2 J�0 975 45C� i,687 1,764 x X
LangerCanstructionCo. �3�qQQ ���pQ 5�8QQ ].,100 i,800 1,800 4,600 x 60 X
Met Con Metro, Inc. 6Q,4QQ 3,950 75q 975 1,25Q 1,700 3,000 X 75 X
Nidc Miller Contracting, Inc,
Engco Canstruction Co., Inc.
Whyte CoRst�UCtiot� �4r49Q 5�5QQ 4QQ 3.r2�5 1,35Q 4�Q00 3,OQ0 X 90 X
Ron Gtave's Canstruotian ��►��Q 6,000 l,{��0 750 650 4,500 6,800 X 90 x
Morcon Construction 58,860 5,600 44q 970 920 1,600 3,800 X 90 X
Dean & Associates �], �900 3 r900 800 900 70Q 3 r000 4 r00Q X 75 X
�
iQ`�
e . ; �. +�
WE�T ���v�� �o�J
� iI i i{ � .
�l = j.-o .
�
I
� SIDE VTEV�T � �
BA�SE BID �OOF DESIC�T
. �
���V
��P o`�ti
Jti a
�� �u
�°�� t�' � -- ---
��' - -•
�I w� 4" HIGN LE'j`fEFS
� M v. sic�n rPE
M. o ASi S�E�
G F�MH SE�IES,
'� NON- �
fE � FIbE�C�I.ASS i
� H, FASjET'IEO .
D ES. 'aj
• N)
C1 �
`r �
" ' -:-
� �o��, o
pF 1�aP
� �ofG�• NI
_��
, e ,o
� V
O(� .��
�0 �J.
�y
+� r 7 �
� -•- SEETrP. �ojES
�- -�-- e cs/A2
. . tf- -- -
_.. � -• •• - •
. � � n �--_..__ --� - _. _ __
GEDAR R�(woov�!
_� ._ ..� . . i
- -� ,I819 - �0� Iri GEDARTRIH
OELAWAR.E
y� I A,vENuE t� `jTeE� GouuTER Roui�1�
-- � . �- -
:__, _;
, � : �, P��ur nuS��F��ES
� ` � TE�E. ' � STNu�Ess S�� GouN7�RT�P
� � , PtAM. GOUNjE�70P
.. 1 , ' I . • � . . . . ,
I
(
I
�-____
�__--_
I�Io�TH ELEvA�'lo IJ
,4 �� _ �' - o" -
0
���
END VIEW
BASE BID ROOF DESIGN
�
�
J f A'
•. . < T .
1
• � • . � ' ` 1 ' . --� . • � .
• �., . . � . � �� �• � .
�.. ��. �:: �lo�s .T}{E. �Ri`i�lA� .No�'T�I � ?°�tFl E�Ev�;1o�JS Mi1Cl. Apf�RR - -
. : . � . � .: �'��� �hE �x�EpT Td E `�TErrEd�wA�i.� sTEF��6uARo�n��. ATTr+E
- �. ' � GFu�ER OF �iurtt�.E�-Ev. ��Ji��.-�E EuMIF1A'(Ep,. .
. � � '� � � " : �.'�EE G3/AZ foR'TYP �oT�S � DIMEKsIoNS
. 2 . . � �/�% E S'T �. E L E �/ A . I 0 {� . .
. .Ap� . �`4u `-,�- �" . .
� D E C��lc {�L1Ej�iJI�T E }�o. %
0
�s
i
. .T . .
. � � . .. . �DDEND�t'1 �� I 8=a-90 . : � - SIDE VIEGJ -
. � � . �. . ����EY: PA�K s"�����R �- . AL'I�RNATE ROOF DESIGN
- -.�..1�� OF .I�}E�l.VoTA iiE�bHT`J, � - `
� {CoDE�( �i�R�+i1TEC'Tv�fiL t'�°�P
,
. . ' ' . ', _ . . �i . r > *. � rt :
� ' ' - . . . � ' ' . � � ' . . i`�'<.
. . • • . . = a.:.
' ' ' . , . � . . ' ..t� 'si'rv
' . . • , . . :k°
• . - ' . , ' , . . . . ., ;�.�
' ,. • • ; ' , ' . . '
. . " - . ' . • ` . • ' ' • ';.�;
� V • . . . . . + ' . • ', , ; _ • , '
..... . . . . �`�F TRuss��� ` . �.: _ °- .- �;�� up''�or G��a � � ' .. � _. .. . . . . . � .. .
� . �� � =� 24" ca.L: .�� . - - . . .. � . � °F-�°� ��=�, ��'f � � � " � . � ;
�.� ,. _ .. .
:,::' �,;'. , . . _ , • } . . .. ..
.t. �.�y,^t, tin� :A� .7 . • _ ' " r>i " � - .. . ., : . . � �i���
:: , :� -..'•`i_,y, , . . .. .ua" i" 1 -:.
_'xi. .'� . «. � t ♦ . . 1 • � . , , . ''<
, i.� _ � 4y. ` . V .. . �u ` . .. . ' , .. �' j.
..�.,..� - ( . 2'e
J F� . .. � ^^.,�: �:. 4. •{r.• •J � � i �: � i'. � . . . .e 1 '
. ' ' -:r-, r'r:s: � ` "< ,: ,�,:.�.' �„' . . ^��1: M . . . .
,i.4•�.ti.: ;':�+.�"S'+o'r�'yy3;t •2y:�;�`?,..t� _",-,"c _ . "��� y :��MiN6:� .;7� aG . _ _�. . _...._ __ , .. . , ��:
;; :.�: -,�� , ,. �' , . • < _ ..;: •-:: - . � r • . . . .{ • , . '- . . ` . � ' . - r�i
.. �. .YC w}:�. i�t �t.;� _ • �
��'. Y,T�v . .• .X`� �''�; � ' -,� 9. r � �i '.` � � . '1' ' � . .. • ' � ' ' �'� v,
" • ...Fnt` ..' ,�». y.>_ �.� .'+f.�~y �Y. . �� `
i s,y. '.`%'?: Q � _ � .'t• �, s.- r.+.ij: . ._ �� . . . • ..
,;�+� ?` %�" ' ': *,i ' r. , �s - _ . - .
: 'S'. xvM1-: � NS*:•_
' ~'•,�' n_titi�% i� %3:" ~�9'.. "_; � -' a. /� �.�.+ �++. . __ . ..... _ . . . _ .
.it�i� -, . . . .":' � i.E' � `? ,:�t4. ��f./,�%,T..R M.�.'.% _ . . - ,... . , . .. . . ��.
, _s',.'.. �..*f.� . • I.yt> _ �'yS- .. � . � .. i � • . ' . . .,, }
•_`� �'.���y, , . :: .._��ye .
.. . ;i�;?�f'' e':a y,. 4 . .ii +'...,+:'�'`fr .Y - `' � *�. . . , � . :. „_a•
. � • ?7,G; .iS�. . .C''•ti.: . , . .. , , -
• �"`• t,t� •`,"'� ;,y '.t~ , '.' •����: .� ` . � LL . ' .. . ` � ` ' •
"?.. � .�'f•.,. . , .,�' . a . . . . .
' :�-�`�'�'i '. • :. `' -- �.: " . , ' ' � ' � .
?}.' ...� .' ;.t . ,''; . �Y � ,j i ,,• •'�,' �' .� . • . ..
'1.1�Y::' :�. 4b: a * �v5, w [ >.., .':'Yi: . . �
4 '1' < Y.
`f.? } _S�.{�i•� ' �f � :`t:�•i'�:�...t.�'s.,�� y�� , • " • . " . ~ . . .. � .,
...• `�µ}""� z�ti' i`i��� : - �" • _ .�••'•.}: . w . _ �. . .
, �� .rx'x' .:'m'. _ ��f. �`, w " .j � � ` .` y, _ . . �. , . ' ;, . , , .
.� 'f... ? � .1.•' s•� "rS ... ' " ' ' �
wS+: ' �Y , . . .. ' - ".)� , ' •' , ' , '
' ' - t�� . � ^ • � •• • ' , ' . . ' . .
' , `Z . Z�- f � . . • � •
• . . � . . • . . . .
_ ... - . .4.,'• :�"p' . , • , ':
.. . s i
~ cw„.:4:G: . ,:t' ... . . • . • . . . .�i
'��Y. � '. ��� , . .- � . � ..
� • • � 3, . ' . t .5 ' •�' .. . ' •. ,` • .• .. , : � . . r . .. • . �
.. ' . . • ' . ' . � • ' s , '• ' . � ' ' . , ' ' ` ' . . - t�.
` ' • rt .�'• ' •' ' j ', ... � '� .• • . , ' ' • ,' . •.� .ot:
. _ ' � . .•' . ; . . . , , . . , ; , �,.
^ ' ' " - . . . • • ' . . . � . • `, i'
�, . .. , _ - . .< . ,. . , '. � . ..�, : - . . .";
' . ' Y� • . " . r . ' ' ' ' • , ' .. ' ^ ^ '4.
.` •..... .. �• • , , ,
� ��. . . .: � . ' ;�5�� �D�/A�� _�-�,.�`�P.1�oj��':� DIM�r���oN� . . . . .'. ,
� � .. �. :� .�:5 ���r��J� . : . � � � � � . .� � � .
. . _ : .. ���. . 3�,��� .S: �;- r�" . : . .. _ : . . . � . . . � � � � . . _ . .
� . .�' : � �E.�u�T.t�c;TE�u�t�� }�o.:G� .' � � � �
.. � � .. . ...��v�uou�� �#.{ .8=8•�'�0 . � . � .. ��� .
. .. � .. � ������r ��►��: s���T��. ._ .� . . VIF�r1T .
.: . : . �c�-�" .oi� �Euo°T'A.. N���ffT� . � ALTERNATE R04F DESTGN �
. . ,. ,�.bRE"T `J'��GF�I'�E�''����: �Ot�.P : • _ .
t�
' . . • . � . • . . . c
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 17, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis
SUBJECT: Discussion of Pending Litigation - Kensington Development
On August 7, 1990 the City Council considered a rezoning
request by Centex Homes to rezone property in the Southeast Area.
The rezoning request failed to win approval due to the statutory
requirement that an extraordinary majority vote is required to
revise the zoning designation.
Staff has been in contact with representatives from Centex
Homes, and we have been informed that they are currently preparing
to file a court action to compel the City to rezone the property in
accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.
Given the indication of pending litigation, it is staff's
suggestion that the Council conduct a confidential meeting with its
legal counsel in order to discuss our response to the threatened
litigation. The authority to conduct this meeting is based on the
confidential attorney and client relationship, and is provided for
in Minnesota Statutes. �
ACTION REQIIIRED
As the final item on our August 21st agenda, it is suggested
that Council adjourn to a confidential meeting to discuss with
legal counsel our response to the threatened Kensington litigation.
MTL:kkb
� , . � � 4`-%' , �u ,
� � �;.;: v �q ,
I i i { � , / tt, �,�
`� i, A►i' ,, � P�`� p� Y� �l
! � � ..�c�-�.{,�� $sr?' ,Q���, �t� � � '
� ; .-�..-.--.. -�,�� ���._...�....
� � � ' ; ! i � ; � ; �
� I��; i �; i i�; ' �
� , �
� ' � ' ; ' � _
f � � j � ; ; ; i � � , : ,
: i �
i i , ! � ? ' i
! ;�� � i i , � , � ; � ;
� � ; , ,
� . �'---r� � ` � ; ! j I j �� i i
I � , � � �� �/ � , � � I � ; ! � � � i 1 � �; ; , :
I , �� E
; � � ,1�r ,C iV , I r i � � i � � � i ; � ,
I. l� ' � I. �jF -� �,C � � • , I � ; ; � ! ; I
! � y ,.-.--..—w.,,..._,..r.r„ \ _ ��' �� �� � ' � 'i i�� j ' � , � ' � � ' �� � I
� t •:I � , � , ; •� i j � � I , � � ;
� � ; ; � I � Q �P��- ������ ; � � � �� I i � � � i � _ ; ��, � .
i i � / �r� � ' ' `; I � I i i i i i i �j , � '
' � ��� �� , �� � � , 1 i i I i • �; :
� q/ ��' ' •� i �� i I � ( ; �1
� . i �� ' ' ' � , � � �! i� I I � � I i j �� � i(
� i'`� �j�'� ��t„ ' � (L � i . . ; I � � � I ' , ; �
ij ` I C{ Q � ; I I ��i � � � � i �
I � � � � , � � I � � � � � �
,; �;� ; � � k� / `� i � , , , ' ' j j ` , '
;Q , , �t � ; , ;
i ' � ' � , . � !��i� �G,�'�I'1/� � � C� �1 I ' � � ; j � i ! ; ; � � �
� I '' ; ' V � ! ; ; ' , � �� I I , � � v ,; ;
; � I . , I � ! ; ; � �
I ' .. � � Y•" "' . � � .
� �1 � .__.`._ ._�:......�..._ ............ ......�._....r.� ._ . 1 �
; ! ; -�--� - -- -
� � ������y
(
�_.--- _ _ .� . .
,
;
�
� wr� • r �
` ;.�. � �.�;,_ : . ; � .M_. __. ... __ - _ ,
° I I i ; i � a--�-- S.►� ; s � '.. ..
,�._' ' � ��� ' � � ' i -I�B�,iv�G'�%�� �ao � -
, � �y � ..�»,� :.;...«... . . � � . � �
�'� 1' ' � �,� �
. � I 4 . � • � ��2; %G �/rJA C.d '�' � ! : �� �
� �
� � � i -�:I'�� ���',��� T �/, �� ;'�; � �
� � � � , ,� ��
, ; � ! ' �=---- ` � �
,�.�� �1. � , ,
! ' � � � ' � �
� . ,
� � I �; , � �
; � � � ' ' ' i i I � .
� � � � � i f i ( � � i , I
� ;1, � i ' �j i i I � ' �
� ; � � : � ,� . ; ; � �
� � , ' �
� � � � i i i
i � I � _ ' '
' � i � i i , �� ' .
� � � 1 ! � ! ��� ' I i � \� +� ,
� ! ! �) � i I I �` � � I ' v ,
� � I I � i � � I =�� I
i' I ��+ � i t i � '.
, i • � � � ' � � � ;V' ,
, i � � f , i ; ! i i� j ! ' i ,
i � ! I ' � � � �' � f � �
; i � � ; � � ! � � ; . , �
1 ' � I
� �. �
� � � i � � I �
i � � � � � I
+........��..�...�-�---�-{��-r��-�{�� '
i � � � � � 1 �
� i ; E
; i � �
' i ; ' � � ' � i
� ' i
. , I
� j � ; �
i . �
� ' • i
�
�
�'�,\ � �
� � 3
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
July 28, ,199.0 ;
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini�'�"`1.. r .. r .
FROM: James E. Dani �
Public Works or
SUBJECT: Duffy Development - Planned Unit Development
INTRODUCTION• '
Mr. Dick Kassa, co-owner of the SOS Convenience Mart attend-
ed the July 17, 1990 City Council meeting to request t�at the
City acquire his store. City staff had recently negotiated a
tentative purchase agreement with him in conjunction with the
Duffy/Curley proposal to redevelop the corner. At that meeting
Council denied Mr. Kassa's request to acquire his property in
advance of the redevelopment and directed staff to contact Mr.
Curley to determine what his current intentions were with respect
to his proposal.
DISCUSSION•
Staff inet with Mr. Tom Curley to discuss his proposal on
July 25th. Mr. Curley informed us that he is still interested in
pursuing his redevelopment proposal but that he has several
problems that need to be solved before he can proceed. Those
problems are as follows:
1. He can not rezone the Ethan Allen site from B-2 to B-3
at this time.
2. He needs to begin redevelopment of the single family
lots sooner than three years after the redevelopment
completion.
3. His son Tim does not like the approved design of the
center, he wants to remove the proposed bank from in
front of the furniture store.
1. REZONING
To address a concern from Mr. Harry Wise and some of the
other surrounding neighbors about some permitted uses within the
B-3 zoning classification, Council imposed a condition on Mr.
Duffy's approval that an application be made to the City to
rezone the Ethan Allen furniture store site from B-3 to B-2.
Mr. Curley states that he currently does own the Ethan Allen site
but has it leased out for three more years. One of the terms of
this lease is that the land remain zoned B-3. Staff has pointed
out to Mr. Curley that there is no time frame for the rezoning
application requirement an�l that the current use is acceptable.
We suggested that he could make application for the rezoning at
such time as the lease expires and/or the use would be changed.
Mr. Curley says his attorney still advises him not to sign the
Developer's Agreement with the rezoning requirement in it. Mr.
Curley reminded us that the bicycle shop land is also zoned B-3.
2. SINGLE FAMILY LOT
To address a further concern from the neighbors that the
neighborhood continue to be screened from this commercial devel-
opment, Council imposed another condition of approval that the
existing evergreen and wall screen remain in place for a minimum
of three years after the new screening berm and landscaping are
installed.
Mr. Curley informs us that he needs some revenue from the
development of these lots in order to help fund the construction
of the new center. He asks that rather than eliminate all the
lots from development for three years and then release them all,
that a phased release be accomplished. He suggested that two
lots per year be released for development starting from the west
and moving easterly. Only the minimum amount of screening needed
to construct the homes would be removed (the first two lots on
the west do not interfere with the existing screening at all
right now). Mr. Curley suggests that the new homes themselves
will then provide the needed screening for the neighborhood.
A further problem with the development of the existing lots
is that, of the nine lots proposed to be developed only four meet
the 70� rule for development without a variance. Five of the
lots have 10,200 square feet of area and 10,500 is the minimum
allowed under the 70� rule. Mr. Curley would like some feeling
from the Council on whether the City would favorably consider a
variance for these five lots to allow them to be developed in
their present configuration. If a variance would not be favora-
bly considered, then the lots do not meet the requirements for
allowing a simple lot division, they would have to be replatted.
The next question under this scenerio is, if they need to be
replatted would the City then require the new lots to meet todays
minimum requirements for lot size and frontage or would some
variances be allowed.
The three lots to the east are currently being utilized by
Ethan Allen as a driveway for semi-trailer access. That access
would need to be eliminated should those lots be developed. Mr.
Curley says that the Ethan Allen building does not need semi-
trailer access, only smaller trucks are used. He was aware of
the conflict and was intending to eliminate the semi-trailer
access drive (see attached map).
ACTION REQUIRED
Mr. Curley has informed staff that he intends to attend the
August 21st City Council meeting to discuss the above problems
with Council in hopes of arriving at a satisfactory resolution so
that he and Mr. Duffy can go forward with their project.
JED: dfw
, '
:�;;�::�::
; .
• l , , '
` �4
Scale- t inch = !t?O feet
• /ndicates iron monument.
K4Jyne McLogaa, Dr,�t Ca� SurYeyor,
Dakoti Cauniy, M�nnesoto.
�
�� � �
�
� . ,,�`<2„ .
�,. .
3
� ! �
i
MENDO TA � y
CEA7�RL/NE �� �- .= i
�„ -�-T-�• --�Ve�OC�--
<„ . . .
�� •--•- ----- .._..._._;:._.I....._ _ K4lNf GOt?. LOT 3 1z. _ •I,:•c :✓w,..__ •
�
.: - . __.� .- -... .-: --... ._ . .-----za----_. _ ..._. -- »—�--.... _ ,.....i.z, . - - --- — --
. .....�. ..__ .. ..."' sy .. �
N� � ,T.,. � � � • ` • .' ^ 1[ ' t. . "" ' ` .� " �
0; • ' �y�.
�. •~ O .' �1 � • . Iq "
w��'^ �-�-�:''� .._. , I �"". - - �' 1. _ _ C;l, 2c�3, Q -• ...-..�_ —
. �:r�
.'�.;,�.:y.. :;w:,- . ,.. ..
�
�
TO:
FROM:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 17, 1990
Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
Jim Danielson, Public Works Director
Kevin Batchelder, Administrator Assistant
SUBJECT: 3M Building Permit
DISCIISSION
3M representatives recently attended a City Council meeting to
inform Council that they had acquired the Unisys building located
at intersection of Mendota Heights Road and Lexington Avenue and to
discuss informally some of the changes they proposed for the
building. Council expressed a concern over a fifty five foot (55')
high tower to be added and over the location of some air
conditioning chillers within the building setback along Mendota
Heights Road. Both of these proposed changes would have required
variances to the City's Zoning Ordinance. In response to Council's
concerns, 3M has lowered the tower to forty-five feet (45'), which
conforms to the Zoning Ordinance height requirements. 3M has also
moved the chillers and its surrounding fence back towards the
building and added landscaping around the fence.
3M has provided the five (5) attached plans for Council
review. John Bluhm, 3M's architect has told staff he will be
bringing sectional views of the chiller area to the meeting. He
also said he would bring some plans detailing the new signage.
3M has submitted an analysis of parking based on the City
Zoning Ordinance usage requirements (see attached letter from Brad
Jones). This is an existing building with its parking previously
constructed based on a different usage. 3M's usage of the building
slightly increases the required parking, however, past 3M history
and projected employee head count at 245 show that the existing 271
parking spaces will be adequate for their needs. They are willing
to sign an agreement with the City agreeing to increase the parking
to the City's required minimum should it ever be needed.
RECOMMENDATION
The plans as presented meet the requirements of the City's
Zoning Ordinance and staff recommends granting the building permit
subject to 3M agreeing to•sign a proof of parking agreement.
ACTION REQUIRED
Review the building permit approval with the applicants and if
Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should
pass a motion approving the building permit subject to final code
review by staff and submittal of a proof of parking agreement.
JED/KLB:kkb
�
3M Facilities Engineering
and Real Estate
PO Box 33331
St. Paul, Minnesota 55133-3331
612/778 5049
July 12, 1990
City Manager
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Attention: Tom Lawell
RE: BUILDING N0. 60 REMODELING
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
RFCES 34634 - PROJECT N0. 89-5853
Dear Tom,
�
3M Company recently purchased the existing facility at 2465
Lexington Avenue, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, (the Unisys
Building) and plans to do extensive interior remodeling to
consolidate groups now occupying several areas through out 3M
Center in Maplewood, Minnesota. The remodeling is planned to be
constructed in phases with a final completion date of September
1, 1991, and is contemplated to house approximately 230 employees
in 5 years.
In conjunction with the interior remodeling, certain exterior
modifications to the existing facility are required as follows:
1. Remove the existing front entry and construct a new 900 s.f.
entry addition to house a �eception area, interview rooms,
dining space and toilets.
2. Create an outdoor plaza/seating/landscape area adjacent to
the new entry.
3. Eliminate seven interior truck docks a�d utilize the area for
a kitchen/cafeteria, vendor library, shipping/receiving and
janitor supplies. Relocate three of the truck docks to the
east exterior wall.
4. Convert interior Marehouse space to offices requiring
approximately 18 new exterior windows.
5. Construct a 60' x 92' building addition at the northwest
corner of the existing facility to house several 3' diameter
x 40' tall vessels for coating metal fibers. �
�
Page 2
6. Install mechanical equipment within fenced areas adjacent to
the building.
7. Install two new boilers in existing Mechanical Room which
require two new 24" diameter boiler stacks terminating 5
feet above closest roof elevation. �
8. Install two new garage doors and driveway to access testing
vehicles and testing generators.
9. Install exit sidewalks from exit doo�s to roadways.
10. Installation of liquid nitrogen storage tank at the west
side of the building.
11. Installation of an underground 3000 gal. diesel storage tank
at the west side of the building.
It is requested that a representative of 3M Compa�y be placed on
the agenda of the August 21, 1990 Mendota Heights City Council
Meeting to present the proposed exterior modifications for
approval.
Sincerely,
�' f �—,,�J `
J H. Blum
A hitectural Engineering
JHB:Iaw
0
0
±j: r+:' •?J
,�
r �� �
t,. . ..a..r �. ....i ,.
��. . _... :
� �'• '
, {�
�.ti . :;�• _
'f.t'. _
_ ��4r
� <t'
.G�t`: .'.1-
.... _ L'"
6
.�.:�.w• ,,.�
�r'�r� ( r . �iSc.�}�c' .
! .+ .� ,, ,'.. �•� ��•
i5� 1 _..� �." T .�is . - .�t• - �� � ., ••
�V � � '1 ��rj�d' '�.� �.y�1rt� �,a ��r-}j":1C
Iii,:±i jr. "�y ,f.2 �'' J R:l�he.,� _s�+. �'�� i.�3..�+„'�`+tii�
i�;��'"'1� • ''_. r . �+.. �'�^. ;!�*� '�.� �Ky.��'� ..-,
rF C � ` � �. 4 '.: :.'.:7is•_ - Lri:� rff.
��,,; .:+�+ �<. ,: '�.'-:.~3:� . �' M�+,�i:n :i ''� ..... r..v,
•'��y'"' �,'y'y.�: t'�i`..w�.�,,�-s,,,� . . .�i .m;�►.S
' r i .�:1^ :,_}..•� =1.`f4i�.i, it �+� st' ,• �
1 1 l. F��:!`.: -'1v .y Y, ,�� 3���~�
j �\7� r« � �
• �:y�f4�`..1 � y �"��•+i�
•� `�? �� ..Si;=•;/.. � '1�y4�.4'7:, j!`Y��'+•i. .
. : { • tt e •� ii-:: .,'.1� .� Y� t* ~'-r.'-�•�:. y��.:. .
��w:i{i� � I .i �_.i..�Y�..c�:�+ .v.S' • �i:^.... - - .
# { .icrsh:`;.r.::�.�:
i� .`.,1,.'3 $�F���-c>1:.�= . ,
� . • tt.-:k.� ' . ',�.»�,�,, -s+ti�.:r• •:.
� ,�,�Jr:'���i��. �'� 5�;�::" ,
'1 . �. ��,�,. « �.t'Sii„.'.� :, - 1' ., . Ji-%�ir'c� r♦ '
, . .�.w.l�:.. ��.f. . .. ..�'. �: �,y�..::...
• I•'' t•�, -.`rI" )1y'F+.c.. '�.r .�'v tt�';' '�+ ..
' • tC:4 � wrAa :2 -`��I �i!'�$'4:.L
!
` '� 1:�..:.�ai'15as4_ t � ."'.��: �ii=:♦ .
' i� t � Y�: ,y. j�� , �
�.; 'i � ss 1 �' _ YMl.i�ll �" tJ��1y` �� � �
N. 'iv 'M t F �
9.'�•✓,a,,, /e tt.t g S� r t.�:. �
i.
.J�i ... �� c,,h �t�� i^�•," e. ' f . _i.fi5.,.::
ir'T �I-.w ..i {��£ � _1��� MY(rS�" _� ��� � '
ifs.'�li�i I�'i�L�. �r....��
� �fi'. w�`�`j . .�-. .� . , �
- , , . � �.y � L.>�rrJ� � T �'�Jb .✓ _ .
' ' .r— _ .�...� '� �T ..-�. r' . :.a . . �•`wr+ • .
. _ �. . � ,. . ... . 1 ...,`VIY' 'R"�'+�F:%��Z�+'-�S'r^ _.�r..��.
. . . . : :ti*.`��.��i0'�
� Uxt{)+t CARAtOF
SPECIFlC/1TICINS
UOUIO IGnLLONS (a FULL TRYCOCKI
CAP/1CITY G�SEOUS OXYGEN '
EOUttt,�LENT tVtTROGEN
�a• NTP IFT3I ^�pH
ULUGE, /180VE FULL TRYCOCK 196)
EMPTY tiNSUtl�T.ED
WEtGHT rLBSi " � 4�'�'�*��
FULI NITROGEN
�RGON
PRESSURE (PSIG� ��OUIO CONTi11NER MfUCiMUM WQRk
N1NftMUiv1 RECOIvtMENQEC? PlPELltVE
% FULI TANKIQA
NORM1ML EVi�PdIL1T10N RI�TE OXYGEN ICFH)
�• 104 MKRdNS ltVSU11tT}dN
SP/10E PRESSURE NiTROGEN ICFHI
� 1lRGOhi iCFHi
OlAMETER
DIMENSIONS QVERALL HEIGHT '
TM-504 TM-9d0 TL•1500 TM-1500
530 904 �.523 i.517
6l,QQQ }Q9.000 175.300 i 74.64Q
44.3QQ 84.100 l41.$QO 141.240
59.600 10 I.600 I 71, 300 170.654
79b 6% b96
SA50 9.704 8,940 td.30{1
t0.SQ0 18.4tlQ 23.440 24.&40
9. ! 00 15.8Q0 19,20(7 20.600
11.700 20.3Q0 28.600 2B.000
ZSO 25U i25 250
zzs zzs roo us
0.55 lfl.l' 0.4 (011f 0 4 1071. 0.6 IN?I. 0 4(Ar1
t3.1 16.4 47.2
Ib.4 20.0 bt.3
14J 17.3 5Q4
5' b'-b" b'-6"
IS'-6" IS'-9' IS'-9"
•0.89�NZJ. 0.59��r� f0.6(N?�, 0.4�Ar�
Nospital oarygen supply installation.
Industrial insC211ation with vaporizers far gaseaus nitrogen or
argon withdraw�l. "
C
RS
B
�
fJ
... ..� ::.�_;: - .. . .
� :�� - .:�:�
�' F•" ��( '' � �"V
.. �$�:����=r�
'r��. . . _ . . .:�:`�:�_���:;t:�.�
.9lumax �ui 1
� � � �� :'��Ities Di ����
��� ����}��-��'
��� :
, the �x��t;�:
�'so-�`�' "' .
brtildingpnoA���� .
industry with. � :�:.'�` .
f:�:�:
c�,fzsistently,��e�=�r _ _,.�.__._�
: �: r!it1; competitively ,��:.
.: �esthetically
/�l�using metal�ianels
for roofin� sid�n��'�-
• '`i-'�' %= �: �;'•.t: '
fQSCZUS, iiZU�?SUf7lIS, -'
���ff�ts and walJs
:-o Thermwall
� r��c� Coreroof
continue that � ��� � �
..'h.. • � � _ � � � � �
tradition. - �2y - � �� !i � �*'�"
-. . - jf �t � ;: .
.- �•: ,
. .:.., r:;:r:::=
_ ;,� ��:� s::�'��-:.
_..-... .....s.,,w�..�,.sLL�..� ..
.. - . .. ':tiz_ir4� -
�: •, —` i•8t� %�
?�-r`� - . , .a ;.�y a
- _ ?�-.'
.. _..'�x}yr,.��V.�
�� .� �i:
Stx.
::�:{::
._��...
h_c . .._ �.-
■Ili
Steelcase Credit Union
Ke: �hvood, Michigan
Design Plus P.C., Architects
07410/APG
BuyLine 5831
/VIETALTECH
�.f� �G~�����'VA }
-'.�?'; c>,-
The MEfALTECH curtain wali
systems are on the cutting
edge of todays technology
by utilizing the stabil'rfy of
aluminum and the flexibiliiy
of structural silicone. tt has
evolved into o unique wali
cladding system that inte-
grates aluminum panels,
stone, finishes and glazing
options into a single sur-
face plane. In addition to
MEfALTECH's unique design
characteristics, you will be
pleased to know that this
system provides the follow-
ing benefits:
■ Solid 3/16" plate alumi-
num that wiil achieve an
extremely flat surface and
resist surtace impact.
■ An integral aluminum
framing system that coliects
condensation and evacu-
ates it to the exterior of the
building through a baffled
weep system.
■ The system can easily
incorporate extruded alumi-
num reveals, stainless steei
or granite in a broad range
of colors and textures.
■ Our advanced fastening
system permits installcrtion
into numerous substrate sur-
faces and aliows for expan-
sion, contraction and lateral
driff.
■ A wide range of excfing
finishes including advanced
European powder coatings,
standard Kynar and Kynar
metailics.
■ The economy of stand-
ardized components that
create customized panel
appliccrtions ailows the
MEfALTECH systems to be
compet'rfively priced on
small and large projects.
■ Features, materials and
configuration vary depend-
ing on project design and
MEfALTECH engineering
�riteria.
�
��
���
y "
SHAC2P, MONQLftHIC, FlAT, FUNRlSTIC.
These are the words that best describe
our METALT�CH PANEL SYSTEMS.
Architeciurai Froducts Groups, inc. offers
striking new dimensions in architectural
me#ai panel systems. it exponds design
options by creating unique arch'rfecfural
design options and limitless applications.
I� enlivens ti�e building environments utith
diverse shapes, reveals and architectural
�rea#ments. There are nurnerous finish
options from which ta choose, including
high gloss coatings for that futurisfic look
as well as cofors that achieve a richness
and warmth to the material. Because
APG products are designed to easily
infiegrate with other refated producfis,
such as gloz�ng systems, soffits, stone and
other accessaries, the AFG products
provide powerful options that can be fully
exp#oi#ed.
Our firm's history of superior performance
and regard %r fihe architec#'s vision
provides us with the tools to strive for
excellence in the producfian of
architecfurai producfi ifiat will satisfy the
most discriminating user.
Our technical services staff o# highly
qualified engineers and draffsmen utilize
a weai#h af experience and the lafiest
computer technologies to refine ifie wall
design and function to meet or exceed
fihe owner, architect and contrc�ctots
expectations.
As yau will see by the products illustrated
in the brochure, we are in the forefront of
innovative design and technology, The
utilization of materials from all over the
warld allows us to bring forth innovc�tive
so(ufiians to the domestic and
international architectural markets.
Chalienge us wifih your ideas as eariy 'rn
design stage as possible. This will allow
our �irm fio fuily exploit the range of
design, performance and cost aptions
availabEe. {�ur Technical Services stc�tf
can help you integrafie APG sys'tems
with adjacent materials and
develop workc,ble detaEls tha� can
be accomplished during cansiruction.
From design development, orchitectural
defiaifing, engineering and installation
through 4ocal authorized dealers, APG will
provide technicai and practical suppart
evey step of the way to ensure that your
design element utilizing an APG produc#
is maximized.
<=�
.,
'�."� �.
APG MAhtUFACFURlN� PCAiJl
3M Facilities Engineering
and Real Estate
PO Box 33331
St. Paul, Minnesota 55133-3331
612/778 5049
July 10, 1990
Mr. Kevin L. Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
RE: UNISYS BUILDING
RFCES 34634 PROJECT N0. 10-3550
Dear Mr. Batchelder:
�
I am writing to address the issues we discussed at our June 25th
meeting. It was determined at that time that a variance from the
City's "Off-Street Parking Requirements" ordinance would not be
needed. However, it was requested that I review and re-evaluate
the needed number of parking spaces, based on 3M's intended uses.
I have enclosed a floor plan which color codes the floor space
requirements for each usage. In addition to the re-evaluation, I
am submitting a proof of additional parking plan. This plan has
been developed to show a potential layout of 62 additional .
parking spaces to accomodate any future parking needs.
I have enclosed a print of each of the afore mentioned plans and
submit them to you for your use. Following is a summary of site
facts pertaining to the present and future parking needs:
Existing parking spaces ------------------------- 271 spaces
Parking necessary based upon Mendota Heights
usage requirements ----------------------------- 2g2 " "
Parking deficiency ' -- 11 " "
----------------------------
Parking available with expansion -=-------------- 343 " "
Forecasted 5 year 3M employee headcount --------- 245 " "
Mr. Kevin L. Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
City of Mendota Heights
RE: Unisys Building
RFCES 34634 Project No. 10-3550
July 10, 1990
Page 2
These numbers reaffirm the premise that no additional parking
will be necesary at this time, or in the near future. I trust
this information will be sufficient for the City to execute a
Memorandum of Agreement with 3M regarding the existing and
proposed parking needs at the 3M facility in Mendota Heights.
If there are any questions or concerns regarding these matters,
feel free to call me at 778-5056 (3M) or 292-4498 (TKDA).
Thank you.
Si cerely,
/�
Brad Jon
BJ/klb
Enclosure
c: A. Lehman - 42-8E-04
G. Murphy - 42-8E-02
R. Owens - 42-8E-04
R. Spinner - 225-1S-01
H. Ibach - 42-8W-08
K. Beneke - Ryan Construction
i • ��
TKDA TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL,•ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUIIOING
SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101
612/292-4400
Project _� � Q�CES ��%3� ' W.11 S;^$ Comm No 9� "� �s Sheet _�_ of _ �
Computations for �Qk�N� �-aT '�mP tA�JCE (2EVIS�D, gy B•�.S Date � o� 9�
Chkd Date
MErJ"�CrT"A NEtC�4-lTS fZEQu � 2ED o�F 5'f�E6T i�l' �C. � NGluSAU� :
- �FF � CE A�EA �> lo��oo GT. Z, . I�icG . SPAC E/ �oo F'-r. Z
• I�nF� � F�62� cA-r� �JG o2 �¢oeEss �+.1� . 4�+ ) i��7ttG, sPAcF�e��r?
(�r�c�u'aEs LaB ae6Rs)
• w' 1-�SE. ��roeA6E� ETc. I f'�G. SPACE/zcod Fr.z
o��tCE AQE�
���k I� SE C'oQti1E¢. oG -r�.}� � g�OG.� :
I�o' x i z s'= ao, o0o Fr. 2
�QF� z( NoQ-� EN� oF a�.�., ��sT
f o-� " x 14S' = 15, S i S F-r. z
o F Co m mo►J A R.EA, :
_ �o,000 + IS, �Is = 3S, ��5 �-r,�'
F'ocF �CC AfLEA
35,515/ 178 REQ t7. S�ACE'S Fo2 oFFiCE AQEQ
. _ � .
.. 200-
Ml�nikF�c-ru Q� �.�G �42Ef�
�2�� 1�Skl Co2N��2 pF T�E ac..�6�•
�83� x 3�0'� + �?3' x !6i' � = 38, 36� �T,�'
�REh Z( tilo2ii� 6a1 t'� o� ?ikE �.'�� �
��to x z(oS��.a- �t8� x 30'� +�84 �C 18� �+ ��o� x��✓S'� = 3fo��ll�2, �T,'•
�MFCa. �eEa
= 38,3610 + 3f•, 9l02 ='7S, 348 FT, �'
.•. 4 + ,s,���o = � �EQ��. ��.�s Foe M�. a2EA
T��� TOLTZ. KING, DUVALL,•ANOERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPOHATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101
612/292-4400
Project �/��£s �'�'`�' -��3�SYS Comm No 9�'q'-I lS gheet Z of � -
Computations for i�A2lGt�G LOT Z'om6r'�.�Ati'1!,E CREt/ISED� gy J�i Date � d� �
Chkd Date
WAQE�-}ouS��.Xa, �e�E Ae�� .
fl�2E� 1 �t7oClL AfzEF� NEF�2. CE�.}��R. aG 3u.Y�, c�l '�l+E E�kS? S�fl��:
_ . �}O��X ZS� - l000 F'T.�
}�QE14 2��+�P�C�E @ h1o2'i� E'�JI-� o� 3��� �ET�EE�I G2as7 L��J£S
Zo' �C 3�' _ � 1Zo �T.''
� Z GJ=
�REk 3� l"�o��c A2EA �/ Aect55 F2on�► t,J6� S�DE oF 3t� )
�3�' K �ss'� +� ��' � 9Z'� _��44- F-r.�
. z
�w'Hs�. AaEA'S - IoCO + -JZO + � 144 = 8a� �.
' . . . .. •� 88`4/ = S �EQ' 1�. S�ACES .Foe. STo2/�C�6 142�'f�S
z000
SNMmAQY oF e?Ec�u�f2Et7 t�����G �c.c5A6� .
uSp�GE . . �KG. S�AC�s +�EQ's7.
oFF i CE I "78
MA►.luFAC-ru2� rJG 49
wAREHo�.si � 5
'j"'o i A��, = 28Z S�ACES
�t'7l�IT�O�•JA�, f�AQ���•1G SPACES IJEC655Pt2Y = REQ�i"�. S�dCES --
, Ex N5-�' � �G 5�S
„ ., ��
= �$z, - 2'11 = 11
I I l�Ae1( ��G 5 t'��10E5 17EF t C I E�JT 'B�SE l7 k�o►�
��r�aSEi� t�sh6�.
3M Facilities Engineering
and Real Estate
� PO Box 33331
St. Paul, Minnesota 55133-3331
612/778 5049
July 10, 1990
Mr. Kevin L. Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
City of Mendota Heights �
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
RE: UNISYS BUILDING
RFCES 34634 PROJECT N0. 10-3550
Dear Mr. Batchelder:
�
I am writing to address the issues we discussed at our June 25th
meeting. It was determined at that time that a variance from the
City's "Off-Street Parking Requirements" ordinance would not be
needed. However, it was requested that I review and re-evaluate
the needed number of parking spaces, based on 3M's intended uses.
I have enclosed a floor plan which color codes the floor space
requirements for each usage. In addition to the re-evaluation, I
am submitting a proof of additional parking plan. This plan has
been developed to show a potential layout of 62 additional .
parking spaces to accomodate any future parking needs.
I have enclosed a print of each of the afore mentioned plans and
submit them to you for your use. Following is a summary of site
facts pertaining to the present and future parking needs:
Existing parking spaces ------------------------- 271 spaces
Parking necessary based upon Mendota Heights
usage requirements ----------------------------- 282 " "
Parking deficiency -------=---------------------- 11 " "
Parking available with expansion ---------------- 343 " "
Forecasted 5 year 3M employee headcount --------- 245 " "
� • !
Mr. Kevin L. Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
City of Mendota Heights
RE: Unisys Building
RFCES 34634 Project No. 10-3550
July 10, 1990
Page 2
These numbers reaffirm the premise that no additional parking
will be necesary at this time, or in the near future. I trust
this information will be sufficient for the City to execute a
Memorandum of Agreement with 3M regarding the existing and
proposed parking needs at the 3M facility in Mendota Heights.
If there are any
feel free to call
Thank you.
Si cerely,
/�
Brad Jon
BJ/klb
Enclosure
questions or concerns regarding these matters,
me at 778-5056 (3M) or 292-4498 (TKDA).
c: A. Lehman - 42-8E-04
G. Murphy - 42-8E-02
R. Owens - 42-8E-04
R. Spinner - 225-1S-01
H. Ibach - 42-8W-08
K. Beneke - Ryan Construction
�
� � �
� TKDA TOLTZ. KING. OUVALI.•ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATEO
� ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PIANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUI. MINNESOTA 55101
612/292-4400
- Project � � Q�CES '� �'�3'4' - WJ�S;^$ Comm No ���'� (s Sheet �- of �^
Computations for �Rk� NV �-�T ��P 1 A1.10E �2EV15ED, By DJ-S Date � o� 9�
Chkd Date
IY1ErJt�1'A u6�G�NTS izEG�ui ¢E� oFF S-�2EfT �1112�G1►Y�t.tSAC�� :
- �FF � CE AeEA �>��co GT. Z) . 1�. sPAC EI �oo �'-r. Z
• IY1FC� � F�B2i Cf1T1 ^1G a� �2QC.E5S i iJC� . q- + J�}CG, S�ACE/e�nFr.'
( i rJCt,u�fS �.A g A+'LEA s�
• u�'1�SE. � 5rroeA.c�,E� ETC. I�G. SPACE�Zooa Fr.z
�� �CE lIQE �
�r2F�k I �S6 C'oQti162 oG -f�.}£ -g��G.� :
t�o' x Izs' = ao,000 Fr.2
�t2E� Z� Nc2ri� Enf� oF 3t.�G.� EPrST
�01 " x 14S � 15, � � S F't'. Z
oF Commaa AR.sA) =
_ �o,000 + is� $ts = 35, �IS FT.�'
�'oGF �CC AREA
�,� 35,5�5/200 = 1T8 REQ' i7. SP4GE'S Fo2 oFFiCE � AQE14
M�1nIkF�c-ru 2� wX� �2E�
AQ�� 1� S�J Co2N�� OF Ti�E a�.�6� :
C$3 x 3�0�� +��3� K!62` �= 38, 38� �T,2
�REIk Z C NoRi i� Eh! t7 0� 't'ikE �.�o� �
(Qo x z�S��-�- (�8' x 30'� +(84' x 18� �+ ��o� k 158'� = 3to,q�o2 FT,''
_�'J3,3�(0 + 3(•, 9�2 = 7S, 348 FT. 2
�MFG�, ae�a
.' . 4 +-1 s, �%800 = 9� i?EQ ` t7 . St��ES Fo Q. M FC .� 2EA
. /
TKDA TOLTZ, KING. DUVALL.•ANOEFSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILOING
SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101
612/292-4400
Project �/Q��s ���'`�' - �11�15YS Comm No 9�'4'-I IS Sheet Z- of � -
Computations fo� ����*� LoT �om6►'�- t,.� AF.X� CRE�ISE�� By J, Date � n% d
Chkd Date
WaQE�ous��, �eq�E Ae��
/1�2E� I �t7oCiL A2Ef� NEk2. G�EtiY�R.
_ . �}O � �C ZS � - 1000 � FT, z
a 3L�, 0►.1 '�F6 Ei4S? Si�E):
�QEQ 2��P�C�6 @ PIoQ'fi� ErJ17 0� 3�A�� ��'�JEEn! G2.is7 L���S
F �. C, � .
zo' x 3�' _ � 1zo �T.'' ,
�REk 3 C L7oC�c A26A �� AcetSS F2oM t�JE�t' S�DE c�F 13tA� )
�3�' x �ss', +( ��' � 9z'� _-7►44- F-r,Z
z
. - . �w���s�. AaEa�s = �oco +'izo +�144 = 88G�4 Gr.
" . . . � .. •� 88`4/000 � S � �EQ � L7. S�ACES .Foe, STo2h�6E �2£�FS
SUMnaA2Y oF �Ec�u�f�E� t��P�u�lG %�cSAGE
,�c� . - ��. spac�s ?��s7.
oFFiCE
MAtiIuFACTu2i �.IG
wAREHo�s, �..1�
I�a
49
5
ToTArI, = 28Z SPA�GES
�I'�DI?�O►��t�. �aQ��aG SPACES I,ECESSAeir = REQ'i�� St�dCES --
Ex �5-� i n1G S�CG.S
,. ., �� = 7��. — 2"i i= i l
I I �Aet( iaG 5 t'��CES 17EF t C 1 EiJT 'BaSE t7 c�PQ►1
�Ra r�aS E i� t.t sk6E .
A
` - � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 14, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works i
SUBJECT: Mn/DOT Storm Sewer Project
Trunk Highway 13 & Sylvandale Roa
Job No. 9008, Improvement No. 90, Project No. 2
DISCUSSION•
In April of this year Mn/DOT forwarded the attached letter in-
forming the City that they intended to complete a storm water project
along Trunk Highway 13, and that Mendota Heights' share of the costs
would be approximately $60,000 (see Klayton Eckles memo attached).
Council rejected this proposal and staff then sent a response back to
Mn/DOT informing them that we felt the'�ost distribution was unfair
and that we did not intend to particip�te.
Recently Mn/DOT conducted another meeting with staff to discuss
funding changes that might be acceptable to the City. As a result of
that meeting they offered a reduced funding proposal to the City
whereby Mendota Heights' share would be approximately $30,000 (see
attached map, Mn/DOT would pay for pink highlights City, green high-
lights). Although $30,000 is still a large sum staff feels that
Mn/DOT has now compromised their funding guidelines considerably and
the proposal now presented is an equitable one.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends that the City Council agree to participate
according to the current Mn/DOT pro$osal. We suggest that funding for
this project could initially come from Utility Reserve or Infrastruc-
ture Reserve and that a portion of the costs could then be recovered
as a storm sewer assessment when the streets are redone in the area
(London and Downing streets are in bad shape and should be redone in
the near future). The State has indicated that upon request they
would allow the City to make payment over a two or three year period.
They would like the first payment when bids are awarded and then two
subsequent payments. They anticipate taking bids in the Spring of
1991.
If the City does not agree to participate, Mn/DOT has indicated
that they would most likely not complete the work and not agree to
assist the City in any future storm water projects. One project that
they have previously indicated that they would participate in is the
Furlong project. Any approval of City participation on this project
should be contingent upon Mn/DOT participation in the Furlong project.
ACTION REQUIRED:
� The State has asked that we approve the attached resolution
:k however staff suggests that no formal action be taken until a formal
agreement is submitted by Mn/DOT. Mn/DOT is currently preparing an
agreement. Staff asks that there be a consensus from Council on
whether or not the City will agree to participate in this project.
Mir-�sota Department of Transportati�
Metropolitan D�strict
Transportation Building
St. Pau1, Minnesota 55155
.
Oakdale Office, 3485 Haclley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128
Galden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Goiden Valley, Niinnesota 55422
April 23, 1990
Mr. Jim Danielsan
City of Mendota Heights �
1903 Victaria Curve
Mendata Heights, Minnesota 55118
pear Mr. Danielson:
Reply to 779-1190
Telephone No.
Sf1BJECT: Proposed Storm Sewer and Pond Canstructian,
In the Vicinity of T.H. 13 and Sylvandale Road.
� . .
M�
Enclosed are preliminary plans and a cost participation breakdown for the
proposed drainage facilities constructzon, at the referenced Iacation_ As
previously discussed, participation percentages are based on a praratian of
contributing flows.
The estimated costs per party are as follows;
T.H. 13 Culver� Mn/DOT Mendota Heights Lilydale Total
( 81 ue } 2 ,�${}�`�TOQ % } - - � ;�$�
Pond Inflow Sewer 1,055 (9.11%) 10,462 (90.31�) 67 (0.58%) 11,584
{Orange}
Pond and Outflow Sewer 4,557 (8.65%} 45,140 (85.68%} 2,987 (5.67�). 52,684
(Brown � •
������) �'>��'$�'0� �?�'�"4:,�j ��;T�'
.
To those figur�s, 8% must be added for construction engineering, resuliing in
total estimated casts of $60,050 and $3,298 for Mendota Heights and Lilydale,
respectively.
We intend to complete our canstruction plan by May 25th, for bid letting on
July �7, 3990. Therefare, we asic that you review this preliminary information
and provide a letter of concurrence, at your earliest canvenience. l�e will then
proceed to drafi the necessary cooperative agreements. In addition, in arder to
address the issue of enviranmental involvement within the city park; we ask
that yau provide a stater�er�t in your respanse Ietter, indicating that the city
feels this project will have no adverse environmental impact upon city park
property.
Thank you for your efforts in this matter. If you have any questions, please
cantact me at 779-1190. {W� have a3so sent this informatian to Jim Langseth,
along with the Hydraulic computations.)
Sincerely,
..�����,,�/�:i���%
�
Susan M. lKlein, P.E. '
District Hydraulics Engin ""
.G�-
MINNES(.7I'A
194f)
An Equal Opportunity Emplover
J,-
. , , ,,., .� uo .
�.,�1�4 a;, ,,;�,^.,� . �� -f�
�.
;;
R
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
May 10, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administrator
FROM: Klayton H. Eckles
Civil Engineer ,
SUBJECT: Information regarding the Highway 13, Brompton Court
Storm Problem
Job 9008 Imp. 90-02
INTRODUCTION
Recently Staff was notified by MnDot that a problem has
occurred in one of MnDot's storm sewer pipes that drains
water from Mendota Heights near Brompton Ct. to the other
side of T.H. 13 into Lilydale (see attached map). Apparently
the storm pipe was installed back in the 1940's to drain
water from our side of T.H. 13 down the river bluffs on the
other side of T.H. 13. In the 1970's a house was build on
the Lilydale side, and this house (651 T.H. 13) was built
over the top of the pipe by mistake. The pipe is causing the
yard near the house to settle. The home owner contacted
MriDot because he is worried the house will settle too. Now
MnDot is trying to remedy the situation. But the MnDot
"remedy" calls for Mendota Heights to pick up 83% of the .
cost.
DISCUSSION
Staff received a letter from Susan Klein of MnDot asking us
to enter into an agreement to pay for 83� of the construction
costs, which works out to $60,050 (see attached letter).
Staff has looked at the situation and the criteria for State
and City participation and we believe the proposed funding .
levels are unfair and fail to meet the State funding
criteria. Lilydale is also opposed to the proposal, as it
would have Lilydale participate at a level of about $4,000.
Portions of the MnDot policy statement indicate that Cities
must participate in maintenance projects at the same rate as
when a pipe was originally installed. MnDot paid for 100% of
the initial project. Also since it is a MnDot storm pipe,
predominantly in Lilydale, and the problem was brought about
by a Lilydale building, it is Staff's position that MnDot and
Lilydale should bare more of the responsibility.
The letter from Susan Klein asks for the City's concurrence
` on the proposed project.
'"` *-._.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Council reject the MnDot funding proposal
for the storm sewer restoration project at T.H. 13 and
Brompton Court.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs with Staff's recommendation, Council
should pass a motion to reject the proposed MnDot funding
proposal.
0
G
� , ,
T�i 13�$RaMFt3�.i SToRM
��W+�R Pr�a4�-R�vl
3'06 qao �
fMP 90 �,�
�, H �
� 5�tf �9a
���J��j
" r/�
���i
' Y
.,�/DUT' For�n 21232A
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
_^.�SOLUTIOi1 N0.
IIE IT P.EuCLVE� t�at the City enter into an agreeenent with the State oi rlinne-
sota, Department o� Transportation for the follocring purposes, to-wit:
To provide for 'payment by the City to the State for sewer facilities,
stree� restoration, turf establishment, and miscellaneous associated
construction work extending from the existing 15" rcp pipe crossing under
T.H. 13 at Sylvandale Road (constructed under S.P. 1902-41) to the existing
city Manhole #3 at Ivy Hills Park. This work is to be performed under S.P.
1902-43:
BE IT cURTEIER ItESOLVL'D that the t•iayor and Clerlc be and they hereby are
suthorized to execute such agreement.
CERTI FI CATI ON
State of IIinnesota
County of D1kOta
City of ___ Mendota Hei hts
I.hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy
of the resolution presented to and adopCed by•the Council of the City oi
at a duly authorized meeting thereof held
on the day o;` 19 , as shown b�
tite minutes of said �aeeting in �:ry possession.
City Clerk
�•��
�
�1
�
_ ,��.,,�,r,,�.-,
```L.�
�
�' \+ .
r � ( � ~ '�ti;.
S$ ; ' i � �`\`
� I „� � ; ��♦
� ��•
` �, \s�. r . ,,•%,�.y�, F � i �t�4�R�� ` �w
`` �ti�� C � t r' " :..% � ' ti � ' �.�
\�%\\__ . �a �"',;��� t��`` � �
'YO
[D �,/ �`'� ~ A `� ' \`�
/ o. /1 ^I,o . � I.',
1 Q��
� !'tr:1 �
�
°a pQ
Q`�° �t,r�
P M,�
�� N �
W ,, �i�`
rQ
�So.+ .,r P.r.rL tic�. t i
� • � c�.�.� ,L,.,s
, MaT %aaL 4�l
�+etr ..
�.t 1
��� ^ iti
: �S'- cw' t rtit¢ u..r (.u>r)
L� Wru4 1►TM tos�q�
� '�°�.nwt 1�eat tttn
t �� �� ♦Ciy
;`� �.�
�`` ,` �,;�g� _s�"='"�•
!,»\ZC'`r.=�'----"' ,
.
,
� p �'' i �
% 4 4 t
U � ,,�-�`� i � � * �` �
� , c '� �..
` �:.
� � r . .. �'y ��,�
� �
\\ .`-'=�
�
� ' i •` 'f•• � �
� �
i � � µ o�, o \ � � \
� �. � ��� _ � - �..c',�. �, `�. `
, �
�� �
ta� ,.�v� .,,.,.
0
/� � ° �� �
� � �4�� � � \
, / �ir.> � �i.a� �
�f � O
-� l _ `a • _ "�O __.....''�� i a l. �t