The URL can be used to link to this page

1990-08-07� `� m CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA , � AIIGIIST 7, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 0 2. Roll Call. 3. Agenda Adoption 4. Approval of July 10th Council Minutes (Available Monday) 5. Consent Calendar a. Acknowledgment of the July 24th Planning Commission Minutes. b. Acknowledgment of the June and July Fire Department Reports. c. Acknowledgment of the July Building Report. d. Approval of Request for Part-Time Employment Status. e. Acknowledgment of Information on Squad .8uction. f. Approval of a Two-Day, On-Sale 3.2 Malt Beverage License to St. Peter's Church for September 15 and 16, 1990, Father Galtier Days. g. Approval of Modified CAO No. 90-04 for 985 Caren Road. h. Acknowledgment of Information Regarding Assessment Rolls for Alice Lane, Ivy Falls Creek, Big Wheel Auto and North , Ivy Hills 2nd Addition. i. Approval of Proposed ANIlK Increase. j. Approval of Case No. 90-29: Midway Sign - Sign Variance. k. Approval of Case No. 90-23: Hobbs - Side Yard Abutting a Street Variance. 1. Approval of Case No. 90-27: HealthEast - Sign Variance. m. Approval of the List of Contractors. n. Approval of the List of Claims. o. Approval of a Salary Reduction Program. End of Consent 6. Public Comments 7. Bid Openinq a. Mendota Woods Subidivsion - Rejection of Bids - RESOLUTION NO. 90- 8. HEARING � a. Eagle Ridge Condominium Appeals b. CA�E NO. 90-25: Heaver Development - CUP far Fill - 8:00 P.M. - RESOLUTI�N NO. 9Q - c. CASE NO. 90-26s Con/Spec - MIST - CUP - 8:15 P.M. (Recommend continuing to September 4, 1990 at 8:Oq P.M.) 9. Unfinished and New Business • ' a. Weed Cutting. b. CASE NO. 90-28: Heaver Development - We�lands P�rmit RESOLUTION NO. 9Q - c. CA�E NO. 90-21: Batesville Casket Campany - Buil.ding Permit d. Excess Right-af-Way on Lot 35, Willow Spri.ngs Addition e. CASE N0. 90-03: Gentex Homes f. Schedule 1991 Budget Workshop l0. Council Comments 12. Adjaurn � 1. Call to order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Agenda Adoption 4. 5. � 7. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA AIIGUST 7, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. Approval of July 10th Council Minutes (Available Monday) Consent calendar a. b. c. d. .�,.e. ,r, f . .- g - �... h . �' i . J- k. n Acknowledgment of the July 24th Planning Commission Minutes. Acknowledgment of the June and July Fire Department Reports. Acknowledgment of the July Building Report. Approval of Request for Part-Time Employment Status. Acknowledgment of Information on Squad Auction. Approval of a Two-Day, On-Sale 3.2 Malt Beverage License to St. Peter's Church for September 15 and 16, 1990, Father Galtier Days. Approval of Modified CAO No. 90-04 for 985 Caren Road. Acknowledgment of Information Regarding Assessment Rolls for Alice Lane, Ivy Falls Creek, Big Wheel Auto and North Ivy Hills 2nd Addition. Approval of Proposed ANIl�I Increase. Approval of Case No. 90-29: Midway Sign - Sign Variance. Approval of Case No. 90-23: Hobbs - Side Yard Abutting a Street Variance. Approval of Case No. 90-27: HealthEast - Sign Variance. Approval of the List of Contractors. Approval of the List of Claims. Approval of a Salary Reduction Program. Approval of Permanent Fire Fighter Appointment. End of Consent Public Comments Bid Openinq a. Mendota Woods Subidivsion - Rejection of Bids - RESOLUTION NO. 90- . 8. HEARING - a. Eagle Ridge Condominium Appeals b. CASE NO. 90-25: Heaver D velopment - CUP for Fill ' - 8:00 P.M. - ON NO. 90 - c. CASE NO. 90-26: Con/Spec - MIST - CUP - 8:15 P.M. (Recommend continuing to September 4, 1990 at 8:00 P.M.) 9. IInfinished and New Business a. Weed Cutting. b. CASE NO. 90-28. Aeaver evelopment - Wetlands Permit ON NO. 90 - ** c. CASE NO. 90-21: Batesville Casket Company - Building Permit d. Excess Right-of-Way on Lot 35, Willow Springs Addition ** e. CASE NO. 90-03: Centex Homes f. Schedule 1991 Budget Workshop 10. Council comments 11. Adjourn e , / r 0 Page No. 2852 July 10, 1990 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, July 10, 1990 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Anderson, Blesener, Cummins and Hartmann. AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Anderson moved adoption of the revised agenda for the meeting. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the minutes of the June 11th Air Noise Workshop meeting. Councilmember Anderson seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilmember Blesener moved approval of the minutes of the June 19th regular meeting. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of the consent calendar for the meeting along with authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein. a. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the June 26th Planning Commission meeting. b. Acknowledgment of the Code Enforcement monthly report for June. c. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-41, "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE MENDOTA WOODS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 7 ) .'� Page No. 2853 July 10, 1990 d. Approval of the permanent appointment of Kim Blaeser as Senior Secretary along with salary advancement to Step E of the salary matrix. e. Approval of the permanent appointment of Nancy Bauer as Secretary. f. Acknowledgment of an Evergreen Knol'ls speeding survey report from Police Chief Delmont. g. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated July 10, 1990 and attached hereto. h. Approval of the List of Claims dated July 10, and totalling $285,876.80. i. Approval of a 22 foot front yard setback variance for Klayton Eckles, to allow construction of a home on Lot 10, Block 1, Michael D. Dupont Addition (2005 Victoria Road) 35 feet from the front property line Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Nelson, 2366 Apache Court, presented Council with a petition for a variance from the weed cutting requirement of Ordinance No. 1001 for a one acre hillside parcel they and two other residents own at the northwest of the intersection of Huber Drive and Pond View. Responding to a question from Mayor Mertensotto, Mr. Nelson stated that the residents are not requesting anything that would intentionally allow noxious weeds. After discussion, Council referred the petition to staff for a report and recommendation, and further directed that copies of the report be sent to the three property owners. PERSONNEL Police Chief Delmont was present to recommend the probationary appointment of Neil Garlock, Jr. as a Police Officer. Councilmember Cummins moved to approve the appointment of Neil Garlock, Jr. as a probationary police officer effective on July 16, 1990, permanent appointment to be Page No. 2854 July 10, 1990 contingent upon successful completion of a one year probation period. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 SIBLEY PARK WETLANDS Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works Director Danielson informing Council that a wetlands permit is needed for City filling of � a small wetlands area on the Sibley Park site. He recommended that Council find that the permit be processed under the minor development provision of the Wetlands Ordinance. Councilmember Cummins moved to waive Planning Commission review and the public hearing requirement and approve a wetlands permit for the filling of a minor wetland area on the Sibley Park site in connection with construction of athletic facilities. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 HEARING, CASE NO. 90- Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the SJOHOLM purpose of a public hearing on an application from Mr. & Mrs. Jack Sjoholm, 1161 Delaware Avenue, for a conditional use permit to allow construction of a 6 foot solid board fence along their property line abutting Wentworth Avenue. Mr. Sjoholm explained that the fence is proposed to go in their back yard along Wentworth. He stated that he has agreed to placing the fence 48 feet from the centerline of Wentworth for the majority of its length, and 43 feet from the centerline for a small portion of the fence. He proposed to put evergreen trees on the house side of the fence to provide a buffer, and stated that the Planning Commission supported this plan. Councilmember Blesener asked if all of the landscaping shown on the landscape plan is in place, particularly, how much of the landscaping outside of the fence line exists and how much is proposed. Mr. Sjoholm responded that all of the items which are named on the plan are in place. The numbered items are proposed and will be put inside the fence. He further stated that he Page No. 2855 July 10, 1990 may put additional landscaping on the other side of the fence. Councilmember Anderson stated that he is sympathetic with the applicants' desire for a noise barrier but that he is concerned over setting a precedent. He pointed out that the City has just embarked on a trail plan to which there have been some residents ' opposition because they felt people will be able to walk into their homes.. He stated that Council has not often approved variances this much above the standard along rights-of- way. He also stated that board on board not only provides a solid appearance, it also tends to � sound back. He was not sure that approving the request would be a good precedent to set. Mr. Sjoholm responded that there is no current plan for a bike way along Wentworth and that there are special circumstances. He further stated that the property across the street is Somerset Golf course, and if sound ��€�, it will only affect passing vehicles. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that at some time the City may have to put a water line along Dodd to Wentworth, and that he could also envision the future widening of Wentworth and a possible bike trail. Councilmember Anderson stated that residents always cite precedent when they wish to do something others have done. He stated that although he is sympathetic, a concern Council must foresee is how it would affect other residents and what they expect of the Council - others may ask if a six foot fence is all right, why not a taller fence to prevent people from looking over it. Mayor Mertensotto stated that in Mr. Sjoholm's favor, the fence is 45 feet from the right of way. He asked whether the fence must be continuous or whether it could be opened in places where the setback changes. Mr. Sjoholm responded that the continuous fence is his first solution from the privacy and design aspects - headlights shine in the bedroom windows. The fence would be rough cedar and would be allowed to weather. Page No. 2856 July 10, 1990 Responding to a question from Councilmember Blesener, Mr. Sjoholm stated that he has contacted the Dakota County Highway Department and was told that the right-of-way is 33 feet from the centerline, and that they suggested keeping the fence back from the ditch to allow snowplowing, etc., but that there was no inference that they had a problem with the 33 foot right-of-way width. ' Councilmember Blesener also raised her concern about the present day appearance and the need for a fence in the proposed location given the size of the back yard. She did not see that there is a hardship or a good reasbn for putting the fence where proposed. Mr. Sjoholm responded that he has concerns with the speeds and noise generated on Wentworth and felt that there are very special circumstances. Councilmember Anderson suggested that an alternate might be to plant more fir and pine trees and within that perimeter put in a chain link fence or one like Somerset, where it is not seen. He felt that a hedge of fir and pine would abate the sound and the fence would not be seen in the wintertime. He stated that he is concerned over the precedential value and that if approved, people along the trails will want board on board fences. Responding to a question from Mayor Mertensotto over the length of the fence, Mr. Sjoholm stated that it is proposed to be 175 feet long, which leaves about 150 feet of the property line open. Councilmember Cummins expressed his concern over precedential value, but felt that the redeeming factor is that with the additional setback proposed in the revised plan, the fence would only be marginally visible from the roadway. He stated that he feels the proposed fence in the revised location would be much less offensive than any other situation in the City. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that conditional use permits are granted on an individual basis so that Council has an element of control. He asked whether Mr. Sjoholm could put in a section of fence which would be most effective Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 HEARING, CASE NO. 90-18, FRISCH Page No. 2857 July 10, 1990 for him on a test basis rather than the full length proposed. Mr. Sjoholm stated that he would consider the option but that he was concerned over new permits and problems at each stage of installation. He asked whether he would need further Council approval. He also stated that he feels the fence will be invisible after a period of time and that perhaps there is an alternative that could be e�cplored with the City staff - a shorter fence would be better than nothing at all. Councilmember Hartmann commented that he would rather see hedging than a 175 foot solid fence. It was noted that perhaps the 43 to 48 foot distance from the centerline is what makes this different from others which might come before Council, that there is 25 feet of landscaping between the ditch and the proposed fence and that there are would be very few similar situations in the City. Councilmember Blesener stated that she would like to see the fence location outside of any future right-of-way acquisition, 50 to 51 feet from the centerline, and also something less than six foot tall if it is to be solid. She also felt that there should be more landscaping outside the fence and that it should be less than 175 feet long. Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and comments from the audience. There being no questions or comments, Councilmember Cummins moved that the hearing be continued to July 17th to provide an opportunity for the applicants to consider a compromise. . Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on an application from Mr. Gerald Frisch for a conditional use permit for a fence. Mr. Frisch stated that he proposes to install a five foot high chain link fence on his Page No. 2858 July 10, 1990 property inside an existing maple hedge. He informed Council that he has two dogs that get through the foliage and run through the neighborhood in the winter and the proposed fence will restrain them. He stated that he thought the fence matter was resolved when he received approval for his pool but that City staff has informed him he must get the conditional use permit for the fence extension from the southeast corner where it intersects with the existing fence and then generally northwest to join with the corner of his home. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that since the property is adjacent to a county road, he needs permission from the County. Mr. Frisch responded that he did get County approval when his original conditional use permit was processed but that the County Attorney is reluctant to give him a letter at this time. It was noted that staff reports indicate that the existing shrubs and the posts for the proposed fence are within the County right-of- way. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the County Board must approve the fence, since Victoria is a County Road, and also pointed out that Victoria will be turned back to the City some time after the Victoria/T.H. 13 intersection changes are made. At that time Victoria will become a City road, and will be put into the MSA system. He stated that at that time the City would probably upgrade Victoria to Lexington Avenue, and if Mr. Frisch has any plantings or a fence in the right-of-way they will have to be removed. He pointed out that the Council does not want Mr. Frisch to come back at that time and say that the City gave him a conditional use permit and could not require him to remove the fence or plantings. . Mr. Frisch responded that it should be noted in the City record that he would be installing the fence at his own risk and that if he installs anything in the right-of-way he will remove it without compensation from the City. Councilmember Blesener stated that the Council could grant permission for the fence if it is on the property line but not if it is in the right-of-way. Page No. 2859 July 10, 1990 Councilmember Anderson pointed out that while Mr. Frisch acknowledges the requirement for removal, the property could be sold, and asked what would bind future property owners to the same agreement. Mayor Mertensotto suggested that there should be a developers agreement in which Mr.'Frisch would agree that for whatever reason the City or County desires to upgrade Victoria and needs to have the fence and/or landscaping removed, Mr. Frisch would do so at his expense, and which would bind subsequent owners to the same requirement. Councilmember Anderson stated that Mr. Frisch must also get some type of written approval from the County. He further stated that the five foot chain like fence would provide for pool safety and from that standpoint it makes sense. Mr. Frisch stated that if he is not able to get that approval, he would like City permission to install the fence on his property line as�an alternative. Councilmember Blesener asked about the possibility of using an invisible fence, and Mr. Frisch stated that he has considered this option. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the proposed fence is substantially in the right- of-way and that he agrees with Councilmember Anderson that the fence would not only protect the pool but also it is an open fence. He stated that Mr. Frisch should get approval from the County, but that he would first need approval from the City. City approval would have to be conditioned upon Mr. Frisch entering into an agreement which could be recorded with the County to bind him and his successors to remove anything within the right-of-way at the request of the City or County. Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and comments from the audience. There being no questions or comments, Councilmember Cummins moved that the hearing be closed. , 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 19, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire t Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis �,t3 SIIBJECT: CASE NO. 90-23: Hobbs, Jerold - Side Yard Setback Variance niscvsszorr Mr. Jerold Hobbs, of 1065 Wagon Wheel Trail, proposes to enclose his existing entryway with a 7' by 14' roofed porch. This porch addition will extend into the side yard abutting a street setback by five feet (5'). The existing house is thirty two feet (32') from the property line and the concrete steps are twenty six and one half feet (26�,) from the property line. From the drawings Mr. Hobbs has submitted, we are unable to accurately establish the design of the proposed porch. The City recently proposed to upgrade Wagon Wheel Trail and may revisit this issue in the future. As can be seen from the attached drawing, before Wagon Wheel Trail can be upgraded, additional right-of-way will have to be obtained from Mr. Hobbs. ACTION REOIIIRED Meet with Mr. Hobbs and make a recommendation to the City Council on the requested five foot (5' ) side yard abutting a street variance. JED/KLB:kkb �i� . � PL.ANNING FZLPt�RT , DATE: CASE NUNiBE%t: f-IPPLiCANT: L.C7CATION: ACTION REDUESTED: PLANNING GONSIDERATI(7N5; 24 Juiy 1990 Jerohd Hobbs 1065 Wago� Wheel Trail ,� Variance to 30 foot fro�t yard setback requirement. I. T.he subject property is located on the north side of Wagon Wheel Trail between Lexington Avenue and I-35E. The lat is a lang, narrow, trapezoidal shape, and the v✓est end abuts the east side af Lexington Avenue. The property is agproximately 400 feet in length and narrows from a depth of 110 feet at the i�exi ngton Avenus end to less than b0 feet at the east end where the house is lacated. The entire westprn portian of the lot has been maintained as grassy open space and currently has one ar twa vehicles parked an it. The house currently sits approximately 32 feet firom the property iine. Mr. Hobbs is requesting a variance to the front yard setback requirement in order to aliow him to co��struct an entry addiiion to his home. The addition is proposed to be 7 feet in width and, therefore, would extend to within 25 #eei of the property Iine requiring a 5 faot variance. 2. The City at o�e time planned ta improve Wagon Whee! Trail and was intending ta purchase additional ROW from several lots in this area, including a sliver at the far west end of the subject property. The band issue for this project faiied anci there is little indication that the project will be occurring in the near future. Regardless, the ROW acquisition was timited io the' west end of the property and would not have altered ihe existing or proposed setback. 3. The iand souih of Mr. Hobbs' lot is currently vacant and heavily wooded. The ' general character of the area is relatively large-!at residential. Only the two homes to the east of the subject praperty wauld have a view of the proposed addition. The adjacent property owner to the east has indicated their approval by signing the letter af explanation included with the appiicatian. The proposed addition would be completely screened from Lexington Avenue by a ciuster of mature vegetatian located directly wesi of the house. This buffering is further aided by the fact that the hause is significantly elevated above the adjacent roadway and is more than 340 feet from Lexington avenue. 4. Visibility of the proposed addition fram the pubiic raadway ta the east would also be limited sir�ce the roadway rises and then ciescends as it crasses the bridge over I-35E. As a result, Mr. Hobbs' home can only be seen after a vehicle passes over the bridge heading wesi on Wagon Wheel Trail. . ' Y � i iUBJECT ' ; �ROPERTY � 1 . �. - , 'j` . ` �ORTN° � ; �CALE: 1 "=200' , ��.�, . -•-- —4ro <37 7c'�' . s'..•.r' a•e . 4 ��.-9� 6 oo,-ofhy . G'v/o�yd Edn�a�.S• • ' � h'a/«► e :; . 6�o�-9e � B/a�x-he � � `' S�F�� E BaiS� � a �ONN E• BL04/QU/JT / � 'S /N� • '�� / . � Ei-ne Jr� ✓• 8 L�/o� /r �. t. � ,h'e��'�/�.� �O/7 "P ' ^ C' O cfzai�'ie /Y1, h' Le��d � � �P � �!�la��.� ` Q � :a/,�i4?:�:`r�,�G;"1,.;:•:�L:� ::GY::�i�'l.;ti,�,:;�"�' �Z=ea'z �9"1 ::� ::;�?��?',�,,�...�-..,�%.�:� :;:; �: : :� :: ::: :, �6 � e z ::•:::. •::::::: • �' :O''r::R�H�'OF •WAY MAP 'a):'1J . .z= ias��s <e � � •• �nKOTA E�E OQO PR 7A� UE(AIL roo. �3 ro . 4Z=27 8�3�� C��E• "�� o c�a�o� h'a�s�� U� � - �. ' o ^z s � � 0 3 P , , �( , i G _� �� «` , � `�N a� °mobn O e ' o"'`�_ z o -� O I � e�a f . ' V G�i.+�/o�C. 6 LUL///� ' ' ° �d��f,r�y� � a -- � - - O-- - - -- -- w - •• 561.26-.._ -- az=eq' r;89°�r i`_�E. n i ' ` � �_ I � � __ _3 � � � � - , � c N� FOR DETAIL ,SE ` c°n '° � ' RECORD PLPT � Q `n ^ ' tio �- � � �_ . � � �- ,N L � �� / �` /� 1 ry V ry A b � . pv�`°-� h '°'Q � " , i � .•.~y A 1 ry I' � / i ^ %. . -. • �, � , , /: _.;_. f�`' —k—• _�;�'-f.�-f�l..•�.�: ,l,i{�� .i� „c�c-�i-G-L ,,,,C'%.�v ,('l...iJv.x�'2�L.LjGti.r.� �1 ..� [� at /, i � , � � , l.� Y� �.,�-c.,C�✓ i�c.•-cx� _,C� � .t�J �,F, /��v (.�GZ,-��✓- /-��zu � �� , ' '/ ' j U � �/v /r � L/ [Zc/ �-'�t�--�,�s' - � .�lu_� �,-L�-�ci.-��-�/�.w-� � � r�Z J ��%ti-�� r.,� a� J�,.��- �� . � ��.� � � ' , J% �"��-��- �� o � 13 �. �� .�.��-�s� ,..��.,� �,��,� G � � -��ti., `� .,�.�.,.,�,� .� `�=� .��:�/ ��. �w;�,.�. � 4 '•,�c ; . , . , ::r: :�:;=� i;f:�i":,-. _:>.i:�:.ai:i:i': C.�.�,�,�..� -c� `-�-� � 'LC%'�.c�� .ti � i -... ;� = � d � . �-.�.� ��, �� J � % ,�,,✓ ' / J �. . � � " G�y tr(�`. �.i'�ivl�t/ �-�piY1/T/1/� � _..t/!T ��` 'J �C�� G�cJ�.�.� � Q �(.,•.�:e.C/ �(�-C� o�- �° � � � . LCJ .� �� `�� ,,,�i��i(� �„�[��l/L�-�s`/ �J7/!/L/ /;, :•:. �- i '✓� � / / J t/.' •^�- "'�?"' "`"Y `� �' �� n � Cr,�''�� .^C.��i�`-c�'^�rrl�.� c� .'+ �v .,,� .�� .��.��C/-� . ,.��.,��-.�.�� . � �� ,�.�'� .%�� .��,,�,.� City o� .,,1 l, � 1Viez�dota Heights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Applicant Name: �,�i� h iS �' (I..ast) Address: � / (Number & treet) Owner Name: �- ci-�st) Address: � i (Number & S eet) Street Location of Property in Question: Legal Description of Property: Case No. � � ' � Date of Application '7 • Fee Paid ��i.('�C'� QP_(' � � rv�� (First) (NII) Type of Request: Rezoning Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Plan Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number Present Zoning of Property r Present Use �� Lri. /��,' l�'1 '/1/N — (City) (State) (Zip) (First) (City) Proposed Zoning of Property . Proposed Use L cMn ' /YI•iviv s- s`/ 2 v (State) (Zip) � �1 h�l �� Variance � Subdivision Approval Wetlands Permit Other (attach explanation) Section I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. / � -- �T .z ignature of Appli t) � �� /� o' (Date) �� 1^ ' ' � � � ` � �� . (Received by - Title) 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 _ , •;� ;�; ;.;t ■I�.�// �1 / � �� /,� / _�i �� p •, � v �_ , ��1 ._._�'"Y'' : �2,,C.,.q , � � ' �r �, jl�', �, -�2' ��'��'�" �'�-�' �«�.�' p t� j��.�W � � �g��y� P � � C r��%�� V � r� r-a��'��' �L�"�,yT�'Z�-�� •n ,r'7��'��' " � o �+�� l , � '�:K�.i.�� a q't`".". . JSti.tii�;i':�.�.\•:!.. � � +C it� o� .�,. � �.,� 1�Jienciota Hei�lits July 20, 1990 Mr, Jeral.d Hobbs 10b5 Wagon Wheel Trai1 Mendota Fieights, MN 55120 Dear Mr. Hobbs: Your application for a�� will be considered by the Planning Canunissian at their next regu3.arly `i� scheduled �neeti.ng, which will be held on Tuesday, . _ The Planning Commission meeting starts a�.'7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting, i.n order that your appli.catian will receive Commissian consideration. If you have any questions, please fee2 free to contact me. Sincerely, }t`��;�-�'�.. ��,5�� ', t--�, Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant i. : �?i:7 � 1101 Vietoria Curve • 1V�endota Hei.ghts, 1V�iN - 55118 452 • 18�Q � . � ��o�a �i'�� c e+FDs�n . � . _ � . _..,,,.......:_.•��: J— -7� , Existinq Bi.t./"r �7 . _ _ �..7� . ,�fl � . �� 2z�ca • � ,�a �� _G - Subj�u-�- � � �'ro�eri-.� � �'' � t� 5'7 -- -- "— ^ _ _ . ,,..., �,... r ,. .... . . ... . .. ......,k::.., ....,. _ ............ ............ ....: .,. . . : . ...:... ...��. ............"'_'." ....... ...:::.x�-:.::.:��:.::.. .�.t.u. ..;� .. . ..... ,.:::,:,,�,. . �..: . . _.-+�::>�'�:._ .,ss:: ��.>.:},$:>f .. ... .: _.. _,..::.:.:.,. �.. ._..::.:..... .�,w,.,r..rr ::.::.: z? ' ?, «..«;:�q:; �.+^��s�*s.+,«:..K�z:.:>`H"..Y`'. 4: �.;:�; E� �; ::3; � v::?�v::� av:.Y. : 1: v:5'�:-�'.3...+. .'.''K' ..{ ` i'x v�.k.:i�, .+.:t:.a :.� '`�'*S': riN. �.:A,�.` .'.k+ � „S•.. ry�:�. 2j� : S � '%:2'�..+4'+St: ':�f:� . �.°�� +.;:,�,.".` t a N� t . �^;4' �`: �.t. ,,yr�� v �"� �,::t. ,.. "`>:^cz::. ,..>. .,..,.,.� s;`.:.�'�.,. . . . .:....::. .:.'. .. . ... . ,,..:t,•.� .__ .::.......... .........._ .. .. ....__ _ � __ ____ -- �----- � � -- � _ �. � t {� 8' Bit. Path on j � Soui.h side oi' s�.. � �� ( not shown � . ' ,�• . t "! � j � . � n n R x a, a � Bridge WAGON TnTHEEL FEASIBILITY REPORT 881.6, 88-7 Feb. 11, 199Q Examination of Alignment .s� 'e� T.'� }ea. ' , ;:�.F- .w. ,yx. $y.� *` . A,vFi,k%' .¢1` i}'�ik., t1 , :�'ti '4v.i�..t�.y.'�#'.,' -!�r.r ' X+." ,r!C•. �ii �� - �. �,, • .. �,s;�,n;y..?b-`�w;,i:v. �C� r ",i.:{�!�'» � ' 1..:` cf�'"1��;��3�. .>'� •.i.,"?`.''A��3.'�l.�t�` j_�` �- z'hl•' '� i�'��_J" � �' r , :�il:i.:'0- -. �t{:'.�'s'^°"'r` ,t4+: �j t'•ye!1.�� _ . _ ; l•''F,S�. . �PvT :.ti:. :;�u�+` . �r�,tv�. ,�. :'Mi��, , " „r. ,� �„.., ''. .'r;' . . , .: • � � M . `,M., �.ew,. •'✓i 4Aw . : ,�i .i . . _. '.. _ ' . . ._ "•yP _ . _ HN . 'ic {i"i`iA'S'4j,'J^Cfcig*{w�.k..:: L�3' . . ♦ . �,��_��. at:iL��. .?�.�..�'��1.'�:' . .+ii.. ui'..�_�� .. � ti m. `�� , :F' _ ' " . s " .'�ti7��II'S",� _��.Y,�'N• ' ' . ._ .�' �`-r: ' ` . .. :^~ "�+�v . o-�� - •.�. � ' . `/ 'i�t" ��'$, �'•� � _ � � ' � yx`r :.:-�.��' r,r. � . . ��q,�..'�li �.';°�� _5:' ,. . „ i�'¢.,..;'.;.�,, • ...._.-' . .;.:"5:�"'- , . , r`„ R�� V• ;yr 6.��....';` '�', - _ ..�'�.+ �� , .. - s - � _ � � • , , , `:E' - - • �t �' .. . • ': � • , _ - -. ..:;: ��::. . . =�- . _ _. . . >:lJ `�y'' i. �L� � ' • ' .T' ` ! ��S•�r�� O,� � � .�, � :ti . . - _ F . . +. , a r ' K � i.. �.± n , ';X�': F�Cy'...1: � '^' . ^ . . . . � rrf S �;,�.yr ;� . , � � �i� � � . ..�� ,' . ; , � �_:_ = � `.:• �,... �+ g ��l p �- : y� ` ,� \. � �� -� � � � �' F. � ' �. .. _' .�. r{� r . Y�` .;;i.�c�„ '�"��r q•�",�` j�. �.4-f., ,. � � �'<'�:� i�4.��' .' . - � '� .+. .k•:&;iyy,✓,.k_ � -R; , , �,C„ �•l'� • ��:v8�u�;v�TiR• �' - ..Y � . .,,< .. � 7 ~"+� ' . • • ' ' L'eR`.r.t >_'R�r�i�. :�'' "�. .. � .,i _ + '}'. ^ � •�,� ; > r . �O .�,,:..t`.• . � r.2af'=,�: � , r: �� '�' , � �.'i.• � i-�. ,, ', � � ix`' : a%'+ ; Ex• . ..b;•,. ; ; . . .' i. i: � O ' �� , ..�r '�s,;'^ _ ,�'E, Y. � C�.':� :;,itY' S. . ' . • -`;�.� �.f,.�; ;��,��; .. - , , . . •� _ y:• '�",��w :. ',.'.:,,: � � ` �� •j�`?.�fi` _ 4.� �.i5�?'kr.^'� z� ::S�r::7�';' ' ' 'r'y� .� , ,4 :,+4�,'�;�� .�;:,. Fn.,,:.'."a��` � ,' V - vr' ;r' j ,. ., "`. °:�`�� "a�•:~�` "�:� w,y: :z ,.'- -: ..t, '',. . ' .(i ;�'�i. .. � . . �6�.4:� 'Y�'�<.� a•. i.• r � � `.I�w�i�T�'��'1��. :l"'%��.ta.s�.:��'I': '1 . ♦�� `irS�� ,��'�' �� .�'; .y".'�i+� e li'Y . e ^ ku,.�,, • *� .� � •��..n`� . C' � ' � ,.Yhlt.. . ,. �� -�"a:��ifY:: •� .dl.i'4 �i'' �,jk •`y ."X r'"��v�"9i.,' � ,!. . • � 'a• Y'�F'wG�y,y.i; ,�'...+..t ,� ',r�'.>; «v�;��w: .e.. ,'tg �p »'. :.�L:�u ' ' �'�' :t-,i:1�. .T�•..�'�:.M1T"� �ry.. .. ' «� ky`"K n` . ;��, 'r5". x. , o � e, • -:'.,1 „k,. � . , ' >"�" : �o•s, ��+r,y•,�,;�.:.?:xi�J-X':' : �??. Y `,5> :f''' - �I�'1,�i�,'+. �'9r ., , �t��:'.k12��i'?�.':.N, '.�'} :f ;� .a � 'h: /. �'At ;:an•`i,,•:� (^�a . "�, •� ., �. �, :#�r4�py'" ;�G+' ; i*^ . � .•.`T � ��,. �e. �,''.,� t.-.,i .i: w.�. ,, .i� � • A,;4F�. �� +},� `y`'.- •�'kn`' fk�`+„',; ' ij., . , . a-<,;ur��*�..r.!f�i.yr�'t' .�i.µ >, e:+n,,,; 7:=.^di4 •y.* �. �'iia ' , ` :�. �a . '"' � -. , r • � , ,: �,r•+ ..;:",; � .�+.. �' .' � � . . . . thi.'�.yf::_:; . ,'.�' ' .' �� °� : Y'�''r s) y.� ' Y ` "° '4y„�,.'F.� ::� �r' e � , ' S:'� � . _ ,y Af� • ' • • ' • � ' �{ • t �: ti' «� �,!cs�..,e -_ � .. ... � 4:'s'M1>�,:��,/ ��"'3�:i7: r�_ 4+ `'n y �".��i.y.'' �aa „ a• �' ~ ' � i, if � 'r :7`;i.Y��;'.iN. `�f �., . •'.`ti;e a • � ''' ,k•.•. _,�,r.s.," � :_: -^F� t?.'+ �'�M,�.:T'Av��``.! , ^ ' �, . . .. / 4: � •l _ _ ;:�y� .�.: t `> ;5�, i:�i;cl�' �`Z'tiR'ri i,Y1'�";�?�r�Y�'`�`v�:. r� '. , � W - • ' i .iV... � , �. ' C�'r.t��^r�j':f �� J�':►l�9F�,-�,• ' '•�v " •:c�� M:-ua�� `"/i�./e ' ]y� �.a�: t� �.`,�`4'�t'h?.}, N" �•+•... .r ti �+`�,� .. .,�.k^.i:� .� ., 2 ,, v � • _' . /t� C J�• V I ' +r'• W ��, fa�.'��.�'s ` . � ?��...,'e .' �. �r' , �.. .. , ,'`. "� Q.. '� •"�4.�...k•, "�,""w,��.c �,, is�..�r� ;,4�: .'.�'�.�'w�3�s';;t.'�:� ;/�S,_�'" �'y:, ,. Y A i a �Y ,� g � ili• :V �•I .�"" � e.. �,_ �`^'`.,',��;�'j. ,,�,ti'�':�+-' . 'F .i:�'k�rw � �''� � F� .,�+'s�`Y.". „°Y� ; • � �•. ' S�� <' �,4•�� r�'� ��P�•�Yrt.S.�•.}.�7' e ia"2:xy � �ri:� �. � ��:.�N " iCi��i �s . �i.. : k>• � , �, . ` .7:3X..`!" !� e �:i tbm'�.larR 4'' , ySr� - ., t "t't.R :.R - ... r >�', - "' y't?.axi"',s,�i=:' :+;v�" '�'-c:' � 1:�y.>.,�;��t .v; , �{... r,',�t+^"'.�t..,;^,"ti. �1crY;�ir.�. y•.4;, s:. 4 . r . ,s.o .i. �'� r, . ,i.' _Y '�. ::.�,�'�� .;7�r"i✓`K�'�o .�:�t`�a.c! �;,r?n,.,'�'r � � ` �z.n�t; - •� , ;;:+Y.s '4>'i,y?`�"''� ;�a i�" ` :s-:�..:.,,s. "' - ir ':: e, {, .§ ;.r,,,.` e� u�?'��Y4; yt:. -'t;, ; C � . . - '.�..i�'�.�..� '�:.• . .i F ,:� .�t` ar;;.try..�: ./•°'ti':...:.:.- a' :�'C,'�'�.:Iv�= �t.: �,1.,. i.: �� : k ;` ' r� . N�� ' ; ;qr . . . . . � e.. J.�S �y7�.�.. . �` •.'4�,..�.'�„w„�`', '�-h3f �= �«.�i��.-�,"Y� � ' : t'.K�'�ur:.^` �.. = :.s,c ♦ „r�� .. ' � , �yr .;iq ,.r��••;y,J.��... �!•;^r.t,.�.�1 �rq. `P..^ , . . • i1.�1Rj: �+', . -�� O , .y�:°� ya. ,�� s��k.�1��•�:.L4N ;��^ j�'::�'t�Ywwtl..•4�: , . . ";��-€ �� „= � • ;+�. �;i.s�;��v'`-'f,- "', =�;�:�:�,.tr.�: q •�.. /y� f `�+,r� �" .,f� ,.� � �� C V ' �"iti •...• :`rj's, : b'la �,.1�f ' ti� v~:+'Z,-��p�,+ � �'� � " w:Y..: ' . .Y`� ' � •. .�T"�` " . �i• i' �f �S ri.'�,•�• �^� . w. !��.�';.? � lM±si, A ��i` `cl.F��iC:.t ' < : .li.. .:{iy�G^�^,-' R''.� n'1^' . . � .`.1, �?e a. 's �st'�!w +t !� �x�F�!4ve��w _ '� ,4• 'a�i i r�� ^+,�A� .u. ' �f. °tl. t"4rv!�f� '�,I2.��!itd;'�',��'• - .''+:�si y: -,. . � -. �v� ...... t.r.r� ; 'r. `.. ...3 �t�. - ., r�y,.�'� � . �,,� i �`�"ni." 'a,�.swo:"hc�:.,.•i�.'F��`� •i�-`-. �.�Ci�; fi.,., i �,y,^i,. t ' ' , �r'y :i' ` :.:i ,. ': i - �;�i- `i,' �I.r '�',rr "t. - i'_^+::e•��-`.I,�,X,.. . `. " =�vi•''� <'"I�r!;q�-' � ; L i`a,...� ir, t�.^, i -'F;� :�l��i�! . •y�..:i.yw.� ..i_.J,n..s"�>-d. . �fa'�!� �� `t4'� y . (�.P � . - ,l . .1.. S; "�� f '�+K �`�� `y'~ "'t;'�N"4L.'Wra''a+i`�� r� ,1;.:-,-• �+i;- i7�}°T . . �i `-' �*r�, »!�`:=' ' , � -' � .�}:Y;.- ... iaC- .�.t',.,7�i�..,:?'1M'r`:^<. :..y:�33�xti'�4•;�[•��.' ^ � .. ,�` . :» �:.;;;i.r�:'. ' ' • . . •:-*-s� _k•��,�:�ri " . `:�:=_ .... � ' - S+' • � : .�. ' , • . . � � � 'ri, �.... p'+�rr � ax'Sw,� ��>:�,.� `'+T�t. - � �� .. � ;�c:`�+ s� � - . '. 'i+o'..'� ��c�. �'' ..f, - _ v� •.T� '.P.;%'.'' ` e :• " . • ••.e2��ti.'e'FL�+-��•y•• •�� yi�•'' . i,�, .. . •T}" �,•��.�.'1�i- . � ifs�.r «��';Jf,�,G. �. ' ..�-- �' ' _ , � . . , r ..� .:S:q.K'... i ':q�.\�'' 't� >�+..� rr� , r a 'st•.. '', '� ^ y"'r�+ � t:,.. 'rt'; •��Y�.y S'►i,. • • ., f ' '� : . � . •.�-.�, : � i`: _, . . �. r. .. � . . . o . . . ' _ .� n� i�;uy��5:f� � � _ �:+y`'` „s i - �i:�,r.':Mt'�'�• � . ,'• ".. `1'.. . . 1, . . . � 'r'` ' � 'y '�� ')cr�„yi. = . '. ° . _:•� �'H • `.1:.�',+ � ;�, � ' ,. s":.�';�,.�t��.,.,;�T�-.:{a: ' ,l�•<`:f--�`r�.p,�,`fr iEU��'�«ry ''�:tif.�„�;�•ti,� . 4..,��,:�_ . '�:?. �y��,�..�'RM�3„`.;1,�i: '`' :�:.. {�i.;i. , :�';, .y. •.�,;�:,i�y,�,,� .x:.�-.... ;, �c'; ` ^ '?��..,`pa"`• "�.:'.t ..'r o,: :`ai '-.�+.4'...�„�, .. •vr. t,' �hii�.?5:� �L} .�.r �� tt�=ki° .. Y� . ' ., � 'w-s-,�!r.` '(;._':.. '�s,., ...+:?....�,iV .:�A a,., r(b:*��Ci'�'�?:�. • _ �' 14•� V�, .��' �>�,; .�_.r,.ne'•r ��i;�X:; �%i�.;�,'.'^y.:��H,µ�.. . �:S" . ,sn . . ,t.i, � " •+Ri�.t�v�'e'i'P :�ti'p.W ^ .,,', ' .r.y.,',' ,�..,, � � Fk�i� `� i' .+<; rf+. . , , � . � f :r. ��," w :d T.;" �•,Y•: . ' . 'k ^ - ,� r - .,F_. ;�y.r� `f- � , . - e ' ..t,•.'�.'�e.',.,,. ,. .z.., � :;; . �. ,. ." -. . .F�.: '..t.t _ .:.� ` � v 4� • . ' :� :;�Yi �.,f'T=..�_ i ..r y ' � y . - � . . - . . . , ...ib{c"t«';; � r '�.:+�a.,�'.s.•;�;�y�,� ...q': ;t� ; _. _ . . ' . .� . � ;, .+':.+, 1y . .''Ja`��4�'•',+ n„ ' R�;,•a` p ` � � "� . � . . ' -.. - .4y::,,},:'ry:;,'� :-<�»'y�; ; .s:� \.J . . �` . . ' .. ' . ` ' . . V .. ��,.�� +" 1 '..,...T'.J; yi.• �.�'�..�.•. =r.iya,Ilv' . 1�` � � ' a. . . � � ti.� `x�FX �r�.:sW.. 'h-. j 4:, " .. �.. . ' ' ,.jR�� .a�4 j N �t,`l's�jti%Y a �n.. � '4,'�R=i.�.T'�.�}I?'�•rwtjxl� !�O ' _. . � • '?Y'�� .. : . � ''�1Y�^?': . : ;�, � c>'::-dt,�"�,•'k � • : . � ' , . ",{' _ =� � ,. , . Ft � ia'$�•�' •. , . , ,�'a?4.. . • . . •3 �i-�`��. „" -. °,;5`t�w . " .�s. �'r . .' ',• "y,"1:� . d*�, . ��'-:8. .�:a+ ., t C. ' r� .:q.,'. >��, u �1�+ :K�y'�' ` ��1: +I'!�:,, y* H ... „ ��•: . . �� 1. , � J / .��+s � . - ''r�:_,,P..t ., . ` ,�: ,�,;�•' ' ,'".,... �V ;, -. ,.. .,� � +.Y: ^'fM .,i.iin�•..;�ti%.-R . � .. �i=�f.r.. ``s_ ��;.r, a s -Y.' ,..�,��.'��':.�-�� pz:4�. �j'�:,�: �i_T� ..�'�V�:a r�t�^' . ., . , ".ir�a:c 7`; xlah � {' � 'i'}y`�.��,: � �: �., :, i�.� . i ; �� ` , 'S�fa' ` .� e�+.t"i- : ^-< ':1,:T`*.�i., ,r� �` ;Y, �',��`.'i n .•}. 2' �� y...yl�:':,�.'i.i' " T"�'%t ' _ .7M'P""'` ' ♦ `t . ._ .•� '}��t� `'"' .::,t_{iF,'s,';':�.'rr .y�;y�;k��> "`.� �. � _ � ��'t, s ^''�� . � . .� iw..:t:: , ' - '�,._��..�' , `� x.� � .. . ., . �. �e'.}.^y a , ,.. .,7� , ,, lr;r'.x �':..:' . _ . ^ _ .. 1 � gt� • . s. F... �;' , , �;' , ,-�, ; . ", , ':,�� ' , - w. _ .�: 1 r S t A�.��T rRa TC�a'�y�te<y.'^�'i�� `S.�f.irpt�� e,, r� -. ' r'�Y•�•�••w .S ll. � r h_ . _ , " � . �.":'y.�,e {�'1�...:?%�V-x�r..T•�..2..�. , +�i:'' �� .:S��:f . ♦ , , . :..; ' .� : ;^'-� i :.'Ly'�'r7..'�.A� �� ,�` �._ . , :r� ' ^ . �.: . '.. . ;'; ._ � „�•.. }�f��,: " � _ ' , , `.`�. ;...?yji= �.�; :.. .'Ye.Tt'p:tr�p?�'�;? , • �;�';';,�,.� •e;cr ��;J' , . , � . ' ,'", . ' �'t` .�. r �..'�' A�Y,M� '� ' � �. •�. ;'r'I:.t.Ti' 'r .,, ' •�•,; �w a': : ,% e�.'�.�.',.: - � . , r ^•F., 7" � , ' ' � , , • • . ?.; , L-��. � .. .• �..': '.f'�.��.a� , `' � . ` . � ". ' , r�3�i1:. �:]], /TJ�{ ,:�. `Nh, ' `,�,tyt��..� � µY1�>, •y' ..�,��,,t�^;�y+.�h; ti �i�;�'w,�.t�;�ap`.:��ty�?;=>`��t. ,�, .F, c . �' y . �, � `tt�e`h+�4, ��.}"�..,� , t� �,i�sa„�i'st:�:�-°• ;.,a4 ��'.,'�:r� .��ks.'d��•,;�.�l:•��i.•. . - . , . ^.x�� e J.(!�/ j �" ,.� ',.,�.t;�t, �.,,+ �i:.. .L��..<'•�> � 1 • � .•i.�'Y'1 _ ..� ,�'k.^,. . . ,� ._.. t,r , �/�/��r��!�� L /�;Y,.':ttiii::fi"�%�rK.�'�, ... i:N.�-u'..«. ..vPt::t�:it..^2: f-nMr,...iM'^.1.+:^_i:4i.i�.:�:.a. .� ,x r . %%�. ✓e � ' � :�i4:s rw.�„•.r.i+. • , �� a �`�.��,:� .,f"', �.:fi!i�sj,.� - :+' � .y'^ t 4 , "�'-°`• '� v�'t s' � - „�+'r..:�a`i .. } Y , . �S�y:r: �8 ryo� � a�' � � o • � :,'t � � ' . � , ,� �� „� � r.. , �_��:,:: � L µ% 4 a � , �r�,'fi�� V� .. � 'w� vr .y M1� . . ..,'• . .- -.,�..�4 , ,w...� �'`m�.z.i .. J�•4..�'.•r: r:{ , � . � `{� ..po,, j';� • � ' ^ ' �� N�yA� 7 � �i., : .. ts;: „` � `'a .1`� � �$ � i.� °�. i4�..`,:...� ^ ' �, ' ..r`' i �c I' .H+� ,,�'h � 5, :.Y � • a `- yq � � r• ` - •ii ' 4.�H � �1! - . . .. . .?•; / � I . - _'F, P. ?.' ,fi .` ' ,.{ '.r �`� " �i � �r, . .' 'r ir, - ' ..a ' , ' ^.� , ' " .E:t ♦ .r ' '�••�,•S•'t��,'• August 3, 1990 Mr. Jerold Hobbs 1065 Wagon Wheel Trail Mendota Heights, MN 55120 C ity o� 1Viendota Heights Dear Ms. Hobbs: 5�� `�4� kb„ �k��, � S�E�- Your application for a S.e.-��c� Va.�-ut�nc.o. will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, �,y�sf" % ._ The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. The Planning Commission recommended ,� � a. l o-�. -�L-.� C'e9 CT�S �v 'j"� �1`� `i� '�'Cac � S2��C�.C. � lIo- � l4N G..Q • . If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, �c.v-V.-.� �Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb 1101 Victoria Curve -1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 4�2 • 1850 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS I�� August 3, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ�� . FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Di� . Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assi a t K� SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-27: HealthEast - Sign Variance DISCUSSION Mr. Thomas Rhude, of Thomas Sign Company, represented HealthEast and attended the July Planning Commission meeting to request a sign setback variance that would allow HealthEast to install a new directional sign at the Center Pointe Medical Clinic (see attached memos). The Planning Commission discussed the City Planner's suggestion about relocating the sign to the west side of the driveway. The Planning Commission determined that the east side was a better location. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend that the City Council should grant an eight foot (8' ) front yard setback variance and a variance to the one sign per building requirement of the approved Yorkton Sign Policy with the following condition: 1. That issuance of the sign permit be contingent on the removal of the two non-conforming signs. ACTION REOUIRED If the City Council desires to implement the Planning Commission's recommendation, they should pass a motion approving an eight foot (8' ) front yard setback variance and a variance to allow a second sign contingent on the above stated condition. JED/KLB:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 19, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Ass' n� SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-27: Health East - Sign Variance DISCUSSION Centre Pointe Medical Clinic, which operates under Health East, is proposing a new sign to identify their new Immediate Care Facility. The proposed sign would need a setback variance of eight feet (8') to the required thirty foot (30') front yard setback and a variance to the Yorkton Sign Policy, approved by the City Council in 1989, to add the additional sign. The new sign is proposed to be illuminated and is designed in conformance with the established sign policy. The plan or design does not detail how the sign is to be illuminated and this needs to be demonstrated. In addition, Health East has two signs that are illegal and not in conformance with City Ordinances. City staff notified Health East about these two signs, one on-site and one off-site, in May, 1990. There has been no response or action by Health East. Staff suggests that any approval of the proposed new sign be conditioned on the removal of the two non-conforming signs. ACTION REOIIIRED Meet with the applicant and make a recommendation to the City Council on an eight foot (8' ) front yard setback variance and a variance to the one sign per building requirement of the approved Yorkton Sign Policy. JED/KLB:kkb �,'�� PLANNING FtEPORT DATE: CASE NUtvlE3Ef�: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION RE�UESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 24 July 1990 90-27 Health East, Inc. Center Pointe Medical Center, south of HWY 110 and west of Lexington Avenue Sign Variance; Setback from 30 Feet to 22 Feet a�d Additional Sign for Property 1. The applicant is requesting a variance to co�struct a second business sign in a B-1 district. In addition, the applicant is requesting a variance to locate the freestanding sign within the front yard setback on their property within the Yorkton Center Pointe Business Park. The purpose of the sign is to indicate the location of an Immediate Care facility that HealthEast is opening in August. As an emergency facility offering medical aid on weekends and evenings, it is important that the public be able to e^sily locate the building. 2. The applicant recently received approval to co�struct a freestanding sign on the property. This is the business identification sign for the Health East Clinic and constitutes the single business sign permitted for each lot in a business district in the ordinance. This sign does not specifically identify the Immediate Care facility. During the process of reviewing the applicants' sign permit application for the existing business sign, the Council requested that a signage policy be developed to create uniform design standards that would apply to all signage to be located within the Yorkton Center Pointe Business Park. That policy was established and subsequently HealthEast was granted a permit to construct a freestanding sign. The sign was installed in accordance with the policy and its location is indicated on the applicants' site plan. The proposed sign appears to be consistent with the signage .policy approved by the Council. 3. The applicant is requesting to locate the sign on the east side of the entry drive as indicated on the site plan. In order to maintain the S-foot setback from the driveway and parking lot in this location, the sign would require a variance of appr�ximately 8 feet. One option that would minimize the setback variance would be to located the sign on the west side of the entry drive where additional space is available between the property line and the parking lot. Here the sign could be located S feet from the driveway and parking lot and would only require a variance of approximately 4 feet. Since the property is located in an area of ope� terrain and little vegetation, locating the sign on the west side of the entry drive would not reduce its visibility from the roadway. �� HeaittiEast, Case No. 9(3-27 Page 2 4. The intent of the ordinance is to limit the amount of signage within the Gity in order to avaid aver cluttering af signage which reduces the aesti�etic appeal of community and creates distractions for motorists. 7he ardinance also controls the types of signs that can be utilized and the size of signage. Seciion 18.7{l)a establishes the maximum aggregate square foatage of signage permitted an a lot within the B districts. The standard is based on the length of the building front plus any additional lot frontage not accupied by the building. Without describing in detail how this is calculated, we have determined that the aggregate area of the existing and proposed signs is well within the ordinance standard. S. In light of the emergency nature of the facility and the importance of ciear signage, we believe a sign similar to the one proposed is apprapriate. Nowever we recommend that the sign be located on the west side the entry drive in order ta minimize the setback requirernent. We also recommend that botF� signs be Iandscaped and that the Cemporary sign, which is still standing an the praperty, be removed prior to aliowing the construction of the new sign. '� : , �-,, l� � �, �. S' � �!� F R A N K J�. F Fz, s�. r 16C q, K C N W' ..' � . u � ~ � � J� 9 .A� � , �_ �� ' , '`�, � Q' CJ 7tS 4 . " � O • I t = R�3raTAGE ` ...� o' P _=� _._._ _._,; ��R r A D �_�_ � STa-= "�su�aK naGnwAY N0. tt0 i I ' 1Y �! G H T Q�' 1A��:�Y �' L AT C�.19— 2 �.fl".9�.? ✓� .�c.�Yr.�r /'7,c'�c . �o� L' �`!e>!.o/i' F .'o.c.rG�»/9 c. iG''d.//Db�p " _ " `, 1 %,ts,.:' orvY..y ."�t�c dao.t 6 z. �� r".,+ac .,y 9 79 S ' - 4t5.:.G = y984.$6 ( tOQ6� .� 73_3p249 �•:::,'L'9�1:KG Q � n' e°'� 3 54" ';;y:'r,�a'3.'j�: t � s .......--- — ..... �t' *� `�i Q � o .i w ni .�J s�/� ; P /�✓'y'� •Q � ! � � P � a � � �zW a : �Z z 0 ., � � � � d• � � T � � � i� z� ' !.L I :-U � : I � ,i i CENTRE 5 SUBJECT � • PROPERTY - � NORTH �CALE: 1 "=2Q0' _ a g� 30 36_.. R-276 • - � 9Jo � � c Y VZ '. _ 463.45- ..�" 3y4.4$ 90 I N-° ' cci'- '� 1 � '0: Q>6°2� 3�' �O 6�� 3�... .-'D;� 0305 � ieo 9� zgg 0� �93e�es'`'p��4UT�OT A ° ', �� ,�• ' 32 a'4:p�elf '3> s� W � ;� �9 , '� �a *� 3;'4 � . ��e. � I :t3 S?� p S�� NT',QQ�� °o� Ne�3Y 4� � i ;�'��c � o• �� c n' a=y o �£ "' ( 7 M � F '� ��,�`' j¢ g�s33� Yi �n 4 `g4 Q ^57' . � �n � � 'Q Rr Z � ? o -0`e• ; ��yR'' � ma s�� Z 69.08 ri89° 15� 19"E �. •5•.6, B O 119 92 N� __ aae.oa — sa :� �s w— i II � PART F LOT I � -:� AU QR'S SU8QIVISIC}N � I� � vo. �4, ��N�aTA �� ,:. � 552.32 N 89'i:: �9'�/ � ='aO.CI' / ? 3iJ _ J G �r' "' ] _I .T• P - tt' Q_<v %, �� x: � ;�:• 5 �.y..�y_ �� / N89' i5' 19�E 588.0�, , ,g�� 01 NTE s DR IV E "�" i ti3z55 + 4ya36t.27 , U.27oj 4 50.00 6.0� n'f 24 � t� G �. L � y :+ 5 . .. G � v-�- L o-� 7 .3[p .� � J � Q � ��N � r � � � s��90�'� I Qt �' ci a �n o � • m _' � J a M _. - � N f .� ' 1 t: v� ' �, � ; .a .1 t�,; � _�� ,f � � `.� �l � � Cv {� % �.f� , u- � ' .►-- - - � 1 � .._.1 � � �."' - - - Z SUBJEC� ' � O PR()PERTY 0�. fi W NORTH �i SCALE: 1 "=20Q' �-- Z l�! � . � J : �,, � � �... � f . ..` 1 k �7� � �'� �-` � •��1 ---=- �.. - ��. -,=� � \ .'.. � �♦ �, NTE �R1 � ........-----'''� � M HealthEast �,� July 6, 1990 City Council Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear City Council Members: Divine Redeemer Memorial Hospital 724 Nineteenth Avenue North South St. Paul, MN 55075 612-450-4500 We recently received approval to erect a sign at the Centre Pointe Medical Office Building at Hwy. 110 and Lexington. The installa- tion of this sign has been completed. At this time we are requesting two variances in order to erect an additional sign by the driveway entrance. A location variance is needed since the sign would not have the normal 20 foot set back because of the way the plot is laid out. A variance is also requested to allow the additional sign. We will be opening an Immediate Care Clinic at Centre Pointe on August 1 to serve community medical needs in the evening and on weekends. This sign would help community members identify the clinic and service in an environmentally tasteful manner that is consistent with the image Mendota Heights portrays. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, /�%" / Milton Hertel Vice President/Administrator BS:jl � _� Applicant Name: C ity o� 1Viendota Heights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF . �PLANNING REQUEST Case No. �0- vi % Date of Application `�l - t� -�?O - Fee Paid � l Op • Oh �ea1 � � S �" , � vl � Px: (I.ast) (F'ust) (Mn Address: _ �i' - ��V � � �11Y' (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) Owner Name: � ea ��/1 � S 1, .�N�C • (I.ast) (First) (Mn Address: � - �Ow�Q � ii1 � (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) smeet Locacion of Propercy in Question: c��L, Po►`� e►�Y�e ol ►�c�e C�•� �► , �'.es� o� Le�+ti-� � mn � fl� I 1 D S�Yv� �e �2d - Legal Description of Property: S �� % 1' Cim.c,.� Q Se'fibo.e k- �►�►'► 3 0' � 2 2. � TypeofRequest: � � Addi•��g Si�� ,. Rezoning � Variance P'nl'ei'�jl Conditional Use Permit � Subdivision Approval Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. - Wetlands Permit Plan Approval Other (attach explanation) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number Present Zoning of Property a,. Present Use _ , Proposed Zoning of Property �: Proposed Use Section I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional - -� material are true. ` . . _ -- � �y,�d.'�. " '� � f'Yl Ct $ S � �'V► �p , � (Signature of Applicant) - �-(��c7 cDate) (Received by - Title) 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights; 1ViN • 55118 -.. 452 • 1850 ��'t� , �~ ' -. = � � 0 C lty O� .�.1 .� 1Viendota Heights July 20, 1990 � Mr. Thomas Rhude Thomas Sign Company 2775 Hilltop Court North St. Paul, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Rhude: Your application for a v� �e{�a. �/Q,,rlc.�v�c� will be considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, v Z�i The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, t�� - Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb cc: Mr. Milton Hertel Vice President/Administrator HealthEast Divine Redeemer Memorial Hospital 724 Nineteenth Avenue North South St. Paul, MN 55075 1101 Victoria Cttrve -1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 August 3, 1990 Mr. Thomas Rhude Thomas Sign Company 2775 Hilltop Court North St. Paul, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Rhude: C ity o� 1Viendota Heights Your application for a s(a N �e-i-b�c„�. Vc��-�awve will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, �% ��'-/ 4� The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. The Planning Commission recommended ct� p�� a.� a-� �r e ca V� � i�S 1�o i- �ro �n �' ., u..� �-�l�-b �� k o� -�'4•� e0.s }�- s ��2 o�' � � r� v-e w�� -i�w o Co,n �� c v1 S i l '�-*- �-c�•r o �e�v� - C pv� �o� vN c tti e, 'S c a v1S �t Y'ew�� rec� 2.1 a.6�c�+ �o. �S cr.� ��-.1 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, � Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant cc: Mr. Milton Hertel Vice President/Administrator HealthEast Divine Redeemer Memorial Hospital 724 Nineteenth Avenue North South St, Paul, MN 55075 1101 Victoria �urve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 7, 1990 :� General Contractors Licenses Damorlt Designers & Builders, Inc. Garlo'�k French Roofing Greger Construction, Inc. John-David Contracting, Inc. Nahring Construction Welter & Blaylock, Inc. Nahring Construction Excavatinq Licenses D & M Excavating Erwin Montgomery Construction Co. PlasterfStucco Licenses Brisson Stucco & Plaster Inc. �, ; Masonrv Licenses � Ron Freimuth Suburban Masonry, Inc. Heatina & Air Conditioninct Licenses Conway Mechanical Erickson Plumbing, Heating & Cooling Palmer Service Gas Pipina Licenses Conway Mechanical Erickson Plumbing, Heating & Cooling � �+�iif��fsM.'�i August 7, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council CLAIMS LIST SUMMARY: Total CZaims Significant Claims Board of Wtr Coffin GMH Asphalt Jedlicki MWCC Unusual Claimc Braslau Assoc Careg Lawsuit Mend Eagn Mohawk Moving IMp projects Park xonar Imp project Sr Bill Air noise T Ba1Z Toms move 227.772.82 8,I90.40 35,435.00 100,244.00 30,496.86 1,286.50 259.00 3,135.00 I,536.72 n � Dept 10- Adm Dept 50-Rd&Bridge r�, � " ZS-Engr 60-UtiSities ,3 Fvun +�3y� 8-7-90 �1a]ms i_3sr 20-PoZics 70-Parks F•�4e 2 , r�i^2 1�:`� r'r.+f �ity oY Menoota rfeigf�ts 30-Fire 80-Planning �+j � 40-CEO 85-Recyling - • -� . • 7'ernp �npr.k N�trnbr�r 7 90-AnimaZ Contro2.. �•�� • • � Ye�rnp. , �` ) rinecu �Vcrmber^ VenrJo>^ Narne Fdccc•unt �c.oe �c�mrnenY.s Frmou»t `� Y�� &, 7 ID1 -•4-'r�Y 4y^Y 1 YU-•11A 1 t1 ca 1.2 5 A. 8�D 1# 3�4• '3' 4r2 -4:�2 �-¢+3�-34� 2 d ca] Y s �Z. E'r 1 r"� T& 7 �+1--4�ti 1 yh-+h��cr-•�''4� 1 d ca 1 1 s 1�'+. 4 G ,. .. � 3 fr T" t 7 �2 -4;�1�-z2+34�-3L�+ 1 d Cal ] s ]_ 6f -• ] r=1 T it� T �+2 -•h22 t£r-Y��Y�-��h t d ca 1 1 s �. 72 � _ ----- �+„� � 1:�. 3� Tc�t�]s FemD �7�eck ?du�nber 3 � Temp �trer_k Jvumt�er � - ., � E�r1 F fi+rrdersan & Tassc�c. �9-4�6+L-¢a2+a'�-�ti� s� gns :;:�. :�•'% , � L E��^2 r• r�i�Uei^san tF HSSi�G` �1 -43ch`g-Z�k�-4�+ oeca] s =��- � �? £ar2 F fiir,de>^scan h f3ssce �-43Qr:,-YY�-1'S n. er_a] s �� :�fc+- S�Y+ , r, � -:? Ear� F A»tlrai^son 2V �issac Q1.(-1i�:QyJ�'Q`�"'Q1—JA .. CiECci]5 _ ir�S�.:,7 � � £ar2 F Fanderson :4• Frssoc 8+] -43&+�-¢7�d+-•7� aera] s , . _ , ., _ . � �'�. �� . . . . t' Ear2 P r'�nUei^son R r'Sssc.c 2�-•4��.,-¢+6¢+-6Yt oeca]s 23L.:�B � __ ------ _� 1 i -7�3. 2! 7ata2s Ternp EYzeck Number c. ., �� 1 . 7emp �Yir_�rk lVtrnrbe�^ 3 � . ._ . ,. ..._ . _ --_�• . .. . . 3 F�TSS tt+2-4;=��-+Z�'?E�-7� 3>^o qtr M.. .., ,._ , �. .-- 2].3�c`•= "_.= . �. n 3 J�Tt4T �1-4c1Y+-•4+:»�-Qt-��12+ At1g SVC 3.96 3 F533r i�I-trc9�-�..�-.:,�2+ ficrg svc sm.✓� � 3 A9'LFi' Yt2-4'c''ItI+-•�2t71h-%'�r Htig SVC 14+.33 � 3%33T 15-y�1II+^�6�[+-SS Rt�r� svc 1Q+.�3 g �, :i7. 43 � 7ata2s 3emp Ctreck tVcrntt+er 3 � . _ _ . _. . . ` Temp �t>ecfr Number ti �-� fr fii2 rpnrt ?hed3 ca1 �11 »2 c �Y -�+;�%rrr-�3�-3a�+ Re Val X t ancart ��tr.'� 4 r�1 �^pert Medi ca2 �2 1 i�1 c �2+2 -443�-�SQ�-•��[+ Rt Vai 2 1 a»cart 2�r. 2� �� - � - --.... . .- •- --- - . � 48. 5� Tcttals Yernp �Y�ec1r Numbe>- �+ `•.� Temp L'hPck nfcrniL7er � - -�- -- � • -- �- -. .. ..-�-- �- -:-, _.._.. _ . .. . . 4..� :, Fr3 t^ �c ricf 1 t 1 an] r,g �is5c c T nc fi7 -433:,^3� 3-3� ' ._ T'QJ'S _ _. .. .. .. .. _ 1 3:,_ YRtr V , _ -, -- ;� � 13.:r. F�+ �.. � Tcta2s 7enip ��eck lVcrmt�er :, _ _ _ , . .. _ _ _ . _^ „ _ Ternp Chgcx Nerrnber 5 �•. � S f4pp] e f-~r^2 r�t 1 ng Yh2 -4si�2+-4 Sr'3-�25 p:^t g ;^9. 1:� � � ) � �� r. _._._�__��_ .�_ ----------..-•�. ��.. ---.,��__ ,�., -,,,.-�__.-_--'�."�'a� ---.�._..__ __----"'-- ---_._.- �----' '—'------- " • �3 'Htlt3 9�`3Q+ �2�11i75 Lfst t=r] la'+:s'3 FiM �2ty af t�lenOc.•Ta tfe]ghts l 7eu7p L'hw_ ck tUt�mbP�^ 6 'f ern p. �treck Nt�mUer b'er�rJcr Name. frccaurrt. �r.�oF � I HpF ] e i'1M'.i lli. S 1?g �2 -443Yr-1Z+8Y�-tJQ1 � i Tc�ta2s Temp �»ecfr Nur,n�er^ 5 i'emp rhPCH )Vz+n�ber 7' 7 R:4• 3 F�trtc 9tr{�p] y'* 'PZ -1r33Q�-�3in-`_%�:� 7[t � 3 Atrta 9upp2y' tt+1-43'JYL�-�45ID-S�h i' R S 3 Rrutc £tupp2y' �2-433�+-+�3Q+-�k"� 7� R� S Htrtc� 9trp(aly' �2+:�-4i3Y�-49tir-1� '2� Tcta2s Ternp �f�ecx tournb�r^ i femp �hcr_H Nctmber E+ & Reacorr Ft^adur.ts �o 5+2-4�4�:%-��`E+�-i�2+ 5 . - 'f'c.tals T�rnp Check tUunrber :] ?LIA�I L'174:C?c lVtllflbLT' `-S 5 ia]Yis inc �2-�4:..�+2Y+-E2Q+-i'0 9 Tata�s Temp �1-reck fvz�ntber 5 TLrnf] �Y7ecit TJtrmtrer 1� - 1�7+ Raard of Water �crnmi ss9 aners �2 -f+4c.s-32�-7� 2�2t itaard oT AAater f:ammissAanei^s 3�-�'F�}b�+--�Z�%2�Th-K�@ 1fi Raard c�A Water^ �c�mrntssla»ers �4�.-��46ge-S47'-il+iri 3Q+ iio�i^cf a� taater rrarnmissio��ers 4�•-446�r-•t349-�fiu+ 2�4i .E;car•ci c�T tAater^ �Carnm2551o»�r^s �4�-496fi-¢ti'+0-�+c'+ 9Yt f•tio.ard c�Y Water trammssslnriet^s J1Z�—�Fy6LA—BJJ�'iZ�Y� , 1�+ 8card of Watet- �arnmsss2oners "'i6-�4f+6m-5:i3-Qrfe+ 92+ iia�rc7 aT L,��ter �ommisslarrers 4@-446*h-•Fl6ff-¢�rp 1Yb Scard af Water �crnrn]ss2cners • 3:,-445fi-�0-690 14+ r�oarc7 af Water �.omm2ssla»ei^s 4�-4ti5'Qa-•8tr7-�0 • Sfi £�ctaro c,f Water^ �nmm1 ss� cm�r^s .:�5-ti462�-963-r2��2+ 9�2, i�ta3rd «f Laatei^ �c�rnmisstai�ers :�8-446Y+-•8G3 �ff»'+ 2 L�4h Tota2s Temp �treck Numt�c=r 1rT 'Yernp �heck fVumber 17 34 Surnsville Lcrmber �c. �✓•-438+'3-•YQ.:i-7:' 21 7ot�ls Temp �heck lau�nf�er 11 Carnmei•rs s P�"t4 rnlsc pa>^ts , m2sc p�rts - rtn n�isr_ parts r-ec>^ {�r^ro 3uly r�Pnt MN 1^d kB 89-G Ennr^ £s?-;= tnpr 87-4 ` Enar 5'7-� ei�gr t3?-� �YsL�T' $T3—� Cr�gr 99-3 E»gr 89-c^ .. svc corm �7-•2 svc ccnr. �3-1 �rrQl^ C78-'6 �`c7UE� G Firnc.uns i9, 3:� 9fl. 3itr 1�_ T1F ?7. :�5 1F_ :f6Ct^ �5. 1 �+ �;3. 3 �� +}. ti�r 21 f_�. E� 1 �-?_ 94 17:3. dE 3�1. �%4 LL...af. JJ 1 � 66�. 33 183. 89 � 77. 31 4T 29�. 1Z4i1 ��:li�.`S�+ 6G. 8;� 0S 23�. y�h snlvs -� - - - - , �63.3:� r�.b3. � • 4:� � r'r+.�g 2�99�'r �la:rns List Pag� 2 f=r] Sa'+:�'�3 Fil� �2ty af the»dc.�t.a NP9ghts � "fentF+ �trr9ck fVt�mbe�^ 6 'iernp. ��ecx tvumuer^ ver7r�c�r ntarae: Ficcaemt �:c�oe �c�rnmei,ts Amc.unt £� Hp�s2 e fir1 i�t 1 i�g �:i -443fi•-72+8�-t7Q� p�^t g ''9. :! :� 2 � • • � Hfi. 3@ Tat�1s Temp �f�eck NcrrnbeJ^ 5 � 3'�rn�+ i`.tiecx tve.�raner 7 7 R:R• 3 F�utc 9upp]y' �2-��3¢�-vya�-�;�:� _ rn3sc nar^ts 1�_Ttr '7 Et � J Fitrte7 `'�'�erpp2 y' ¢e7 -43'JII+-45Y+-SYe rn1 sc p�rts , 27. :�6 i R 4� J T-�utc Strpp3 y" � �1 -433�+-�4�-'�s4.'+ � rt» r+_ �Ecr^ 7 Ey [4 3 J'rt+t[t 9upply' Q+;�-433Y�-49t2�-Y:a misr_ p2rts �.2E� ;�D �43• �'� Tc.ta2s Ternp IIhecfc taurnb�r 7 • 7cn�p �her_}c idcrmber 0 � ,� & Peacarr FroGuc^ts �c $+s-443`'•-�'�2h2+-7�2+ r^ecr pr�g Yi:�.17 g x 2',^_. 11 = Fc.ta 2 s TPh)�J i:,t�c cH 1Uuntber 3 _ _ . . . . . . . - ; •a• ' ... . _ . Tem¢ �hc=c.fc 7Vurnber 9 , � 5 i�]r7`s Tt�r_ s�i-sr�=�¢m-6s�2e-7�+ July r•eni . 3itr.'�J � 3fH. � .a 3c.ta t s Tenrp L.t�eck Ntrn�ber 9 _ .___ 7ern{� �i�eck Taurntrer 1¢� . : ~. � .. . • . . . . � ., � . • . _ _ _ �� .r; .. .. .. . .. _ . . ��.: , 9� Bc�ard cf Water �arn�n3sslcners 8+2-�9��'..s-�1�n-7Q MN rtl h. �r� 1rh i�oa�^d aP taater �ammissAone�^s 3'3-%+�+fiQ+--2»ML-�h0 fra 89-c '�1t3.S] 2sZ+ E;car^d aP k+ater �amm2ss2c.»er^s tr3-ti46fi-84Y-� Eng>� is'J-;= ri2.3H 1Q+ Paa�^cf c+� Water^ i:.crnnll s51 aners 9�•-4460-•a49-•Q+V.+ tngr 8'Y-4 Y 7:3. C�6 sfi Scard aT bJater �ornmsss2a»�rs �4�-44r,fi-¢ti'++2+-�H ` £ng>^ 5'?-S 3:�_�:4 9+Lr Lra�rd cYY Water tromrn2ssior�e7^s ✓41-4y61P-6:i:,-'ib'Qs E��gr t3'7-� L=L�. JJ , 1�+ 8c.arA af W2te1^ �amnr2ssAaners .:i6-Yi46�+-5�-S+fa £ngr 5r3-3 1s66�.33 1Q+ r't.o�rtl o7 iAater �omm2sslc�nere 4�-496tZr-tl6a•-•¢�+h Engr �9-3 1�3.ti9 9i2+ Scard of Water �cm�a3ssicners � 3:,-41i5Q�-•a3iZ+0-P.�O £ngr^ 83-� 777-3] _ 3Q+ fioard oi' Wa.ter �amm1 sss o»ei^s 93-446t2+-•847-�tL�+h svc coni� 9'7-•2 4T 292s. �+�t 1� £�c+arG aT iaater �orrtm3ss]c�ners .:r�-Yi+rf�2�-S63-rZ+�b svc cann 59-3 1, 19fi..:,�1+ 2�& l:Ta�rO of Watel^ �arari71ss2oi�c:rs :�8-4�6Yt+-•863-ti+0. ._ _ _. _ Engr es8-'6 6G.8;? . - -- 3C-�+ A7 1�Y[+, wY� Tata2c Temp �Yiecfr rvumn�r 1� - , - -- - -- - - - -- -._.. .._ .__...._...---- ._ . ..- . 'iemp Check tv�mit+er 21 �4 Sur^nsvil2e Lcember �c �✓•-43L.'�'3-•Y�'+:l-1;� sp2ys � � �63.3:i 12 'c.:53_ � 7oLals Temp �f-�ec7c htumber 11 � - - - - --- __ .�. - . i 3 `3 Fttrn 1S i'd� F'ri YtY�:i�'� F+th i Ten7�+ L'hecf,� iacrrnt7P1^ Y'+'- ' �rerr�c+_ E•Yre=r. 7t fVu�t��er, Ver.r�c.r Na. rne 1�? f7av,tr.t t�r�s2at+ frssoc 7trc 7'� 7cta]5 ienrp �t�ec#r tVcrmr�r i En,Fr �.nc�cx tvurnKrei^ Y J ]� f�C+3ciYTd LaWY+ '�VC 1� 7ata25 Tem{,a �neck 7dunrbe,^ Te7ir� �tteCk tattrAb�s^ 3 ri s=t �.at^2sc�r�r Yr^actcr R• £o 1 �f 3'c.ta 2 s Tentp �hc c^k Nz+Mt+er TEtRj� L"hPC-}t tJttttibGt` *✓ �:r �as� fic�we:^ .F Eq , 2'.`� L".ciSB � C WE'}^ 24 £Cj s:, �a5e fic.wer � �q 4:1 '7'ata15 Tentp L'heCk IVt�ntbe+l^ T�tn{� �tteck Netrnaer 1 � 96 �rr2pin i`uv2sstr2ntj. �v Tota2� T�mp �hPck Jvctrnbe�^ 7errrp �t�ecu 7ounyber- x7 27 �3�y rtctc.s- 5ugp3y x 7 � t ty rtG*tor �J' upp2y �7 �2ty rtc�tc.r t3arAP�Y 27 �1T.}r t+tc�t�r JccFP�Y a� £izy 1tic.tc.r Scr�+p2Y Y7 �Aty fhator JtrpP1Y 1'i �aty rtc.tc.s� JuP{�]y 23 �ity tncttar Je.rPPSY � :3C Tc�a2� 3'ernp Cr7eck laefirnbQr^ Ter�tp �»eck fVa�mber 2fa AS �c.�rnrnerc*1a1 FrSpYra2t � L.":Ict�)YrS L15i: �.t ty oi' t+1e,�ci�:+ta f-fei,at�r,s i�r.c•c,cirrY: �one 9 E-4ca?'yY+-'Qt�tA.'•��Z+ 1':^_ L.i�1 �'4..�.�:J":a'�:'��^:.iL:� 23 �.'+i -•433�.'+-ar:ya'a-7'n"� Y +i 1.:r•- 433L.'+-�rt3i�u •-Sfi 1:.a-+i:33t7r^4 37U-�b�2+ 1:°;_.433�'+-�r3a'�-�G �+ 3✓ 33-4•24if+^-:341 �^� �� a't4 -tt33�?-4it�.'r-::.-^tt� m� -v�ar�-4v�r-��+ YL�� -si� 3¢r-�48Q+-�R�i aZ+7 -437si2+-•43in-"..,Y+ Y�2 -tis3ic�-9E�ih-32+ ff+2 -^9�3tC�-•4347-'S�2s �3 ^it33#2+�-947Zi-:..�y,°+ �1 -tt33iZr-•1trt7Z+-'�?rh 1i Si1 -4rrL�'..?'-Q.i�4e-.'"`.IL.S fi2ne 3 - l� � � t.crnnrerrr• � t�mc��rrrt :� �'atrr svc �re hta5ac S 7 2$6. 5�2`+ 3t1rr svc. ¢arL's :✓�;: {sar^8 s pa �^t s rt» :��- bid ad :3�•-i� �arts ;}.�tt.: pa rt s pat^C s par^t a parts • parts 3r1r;� pat^ts ;�;�tt2 {��rts -,�-: tt2 ra3 x :i i'..�'.t�E.:S�21 . • • - � �� 1 `.'Jlc�. $�4'� .^� ....__._._... 'y, T 1�.�L+ . . !"1 3c`. '..*�E, • 4 � �2. ✓5 , t� '..rc . , � � 6.`_ _ Q+',.- . . , . _ :a� 3. S�9 x i. �'r�C7, ' . . . �� ;.^��. �7 r - � '�..� � .. • r� �� : , J• � �• � 'ifs_ � ��. � C�) ;s'`} - "�3. ��7.�_ - � 7. £+i2+ '•... � . . ��. S�+ .. �3. Yrf� E-c:. ; 3 .? 3�. 61� . E�L. �� 3£+.35zr ' {...7 -- 3�3�E+1 . ._..._ _. ; t i,56. A4 � s r'hun s�:3¢+ rla�rns i.2sr. fi�ne �+ F'l^2 3�:i"'� RM �Sty aY ME;nciota t-h�1g1'?ts r.� Te1Y7{7 L'hP.CH tvcrrnber Y.�`J iE+fl1�. + f } L."Y1C'CH fVtt7/J�+P.7^ VLYr6C�}' tJ@7AP. ACCC�t7riL 'L:Crr� CGflIh7E'1�Y.S Ari]��t.17'r't � Y 9 3 f3 � Ea66. 49 i"c�ta2� iPrnp L:7�eCk Nu{ab�+r 99 ' , i �} YEftJ� L`t7PC'SC ttlithil7E'Y` �`3 � 3S �ararn L'errter 852-•�4=':�.7�'^Y'fYh'^'i"��k'1 r^c+r.s .."'•_�7.+6a c� 13 ,. �'''b2' 7c ta 2 5 TamF+ �J�eck fvir�,yber 3'� 1w� Tt:M{] �'hEC`k YJitlllbe)' t:`% , ,,� �rZ+ �c.nz 3 rrerrt•a1 ;�at`ety Eq xh1-43i�i;s—�Z+,:nt�—J�?.+ rn:! sc sc�3 ys x 3_ 73 - - L'� � ' .. , • r � � 3. T3 �3'Cs�cTlg i8h1(7 G`itE'CH i�ttttt7i+@Y• i..�L1+ - ; } Temp �h�nk t4urnber :'1 � ' 'i 2 �Cr:�Y UCt{71 2 Cei'� 9 Yrt� F-''J'CC1 LlGt S ��1 ^rt317��Q+.:iYcy",:�� t CYr�Y` ri:�. :�Lh � 21 Copy T�t��+1 .t c� t 2 ng fir�od uCt s fC+1 ^9:3��:r-¢�7¢+-? ¢� , t o� �L r i . A� .�s�+ :,_) �1 �c�{aY Y'rtr{722cat3rszl �rcducts 1a.-Fr3�^inS�-•6�+ tc»er . . �4:r..:�Y2+ ;�2 i:-C'+py 7L�p11 r. oTt 1 s rg F'i^c.d vCi: s R+h -43tL+:.✓-•��-�:++2v 3'u 2 CG'�D3 G 5 B. 1:3 r __ - ----_._ �_� t!4 1 �s•t. 63 Tcta35 3'emp �neck tVcrrnX7er ;•2 .� . .. • . . � 3Plti{? L.')7ECk 1VCfltTL3E1^ , i??_ , - �� _ , , �� c�r^r�lt�arr E1ect�^7c ' •. _ tDx-4�3AJ^-�43�.'+-;Sfn � r^Pr^� , . . - , .s3.3� {✓ ��i :1�t� .�.�i.µ"a TcsY.a2 S Tentp �f�eak lUurnber ; c? �� Ternp ��-i�cft »ertnrser �.s . - !..� ;=3 �irstom 7crr-r �:s--433�-�fi-r2+� _ _ ,Yse naz] �'9e2n _ . . '�:,.�ti+ r^..:3 �us'tc�m 'iut^T Ylsd^ft33�--t2tiZztZ+-'+2+E� m3 sc sp3 ys 2 ihl �� _._ ----•-^ f..� +�6 ' . . ... _.. 9 i6. �hr2�+ 1'aLal� '#'esnp �t�eak Nurnber� �3 . �..,} 3e•mp �her_k lVc+nrber 24 _ _ _ __ , „ . _ _„ . _ _ ' �tr Uakc�ta �r..ttnt y Nwy P3e{�t $+9 -427 9-'��'tn-.;r�+ �1 Ly sri 3t^ t fc s3 qi��] 5 33�i. �= 4`� ..,.} i_� . _ . . . _ . ._ _._ ._ . � .._ .�, ... __ _ - .�..'3:J_;=$+ �_. , 3'otals �'en�p �t�e�cx tvumf�er � t�y �..f Tetnp �Yfeck Nunrber =':.r - � -. ... - .. .^ - ..' ' :..'S Sc�fnes 3:+a»ie].Ko» �:3^ri41✓-1g+✓-�.:, Acrg BtlGw _._. ... ._. .__..._._�. x�-'�t+.a'�Qr ! , . "', 3 Fitlt3 2'33L:a �Y�r1h75 LiSti fiage :, Fri :tiZ+:�'"3 r'iM City ��i' i�tendcta f-telghts , . _ _1 5'emp �necx toirrannr .o._ _ 'remp. . , ' �) zf�ecx - 1Vurnber b'e.noc�r Narne ficr_oir»s i�r.�dP �arnmerrts Frrnc�unC tt ;�,� 1;�ri. II�21 Tata2 s 3erap �Y�e.r.H �VLtb7bBT� '�� , _ , _ , , � 3e�a�+ irneck tVurnt+er• '26 , ' s•'_6 lSartex T4 -�8�-&�+3¢�-3yt+ narO dr2 ve �383. 33 �` � ;��, 58�. 33 3ot�1s Ten�p �t�ec^k }Vumber :'E� ' � Temp �hec}c Ni�n�ber �7 ..-1 27 fien>•r2s f3elma»t• �1--441�-�2+�=`f�-;_�* f�irg a13aw 1�'�8+.2«+ •,n7 1 L�. �YC . . . ....) Tatals i�n�f+ �neck ?Vun�ba_r c7 � Temp �hec7r Number :?S - � r8 Ue�]er riutcmc.t2vP Svcs �7+3-v33tr-96�-•3tn rprs ;=��33 �925.13 __ _. � ��} ;�S JL�`3. i 3 7ata25 Tenrp Check hluiirt+er 2� �, �. �� Tern{s �Y�ec?c Nurnbet^ i"3 - , �3 t8 t= f'1P.iscYlhacfcc:t� Y+8-43.3:�-�'2�2-�Z� , sidewalk adtl» , _ .�, �4;aQ+.S�2+ , � •c3 _ tFi�¢y. �t2 � . - . , [ � 7c�t�25 'S"enrF, �f�rack tVumber �29 � T�mp �Yrecfr ?4urnbPr �� _ � . - . . !..,� 3�+ flfii£t S�rs2rress Svc �¢i-ar�,?"..rY-31zP-3� Re ��re.y f21e ��&:�4;?Y�3£3r37 . ,=�'��.a�0 � 11+ L` �Yc�. �.'�. ` . � TC.LeT.iS iBnT� L'Y)LCH iVtt7A17G1^ .3�21 . T�r;rp �Y,eck t4urnber 31 '•.. ) "1 Li1 enuwe FSacrr^s ¢+8-y33:J-+2�2+�7-�L�s 2 urkset 3�"S. 5��.� -•- -----• '..� =g 3i✓. 12+2+ Tctels Ternp �hec^k Waimbei^ - 31 '•' ----- - -- - ' , ' • �_} iernp �»ecx Numbc:t- , 3;� _ .._. . _ . _. ._. . _ . _ .. _ � _ _ _ . � 3:= iiMt4 r'}5pha1 t t:orp i[+�-4 }5Yt-tt+NiE+-g+iR pymY, 3�9-6 , 33, tr3✓. �¢+ lJ 3•,? � - 3✓� 4"3. a+�� - . ! iota 2 s Ten�¢ '�»c: ck 1Vumber 3c ' '•.. � J � � --- --,-^_ —____-._-,-- - .__-•_ � �� -`---- ----------- ^_____ y -.�_.�..��'_�__�.�"_��_.�.�.��.___�-�.�_�._.�-�._ .�..�� . �__y-_.� .' . � . r 'g ;atrr� j�y�1, �.ia3ms L2st F2ge 6 f-'r1 3�Y+:c3 FrM �s�y at iar_�i�a�_.ta Ylelahts '� � Tem�+ �heck tvuirtber 33 'Yern�. ' � � ; �heck , , Number^ 1:c±ndor Name. Gccc.�uot• �c�de �cmment-s ►�rnczrni ••� �� 33 Tfe»e�^�1 �clriuricti�lcBi:1_n»s �171-^933tA-•H:��-•.�Q� i^�+i^5 32.�V� 33 T3errer�al �r�rnmi�n9 cat i c.»s Yt+3 -y330-4�R+-3iL rprs �:� .:°�� 3:3 Liei�eral �c�rnraunicatloi•:s , ff+1-•43:3k'�-r+:,�-•32y rprs :+9.3t� �! 33 fle»er•a2 icm�nur,9catsc,r,s Tn1-<r33�-�v.:,t�-3�n. rnrs �•I-��f+ ' 33 ''venera2 �otn�nui^r.t Cat.i ai�s �1 -•433�ri-•9�ti�-•3�+ t^t+rs 3:t _:l� � 33 �e»e>^ai �Carnrnerrr2cat2o»s �Zt-+r33L"�-�ti%��-;=K� rprs ?�.SYN �� 3:� L�entat^a2 �anlmi�ricet2��»s Y+1-4:3:irD-•4L72f-31h r^pi^s :'��rr� 47.3�ri •`�� . i_33.6fII � 3cta25 �ernp �necu Ncrr�7ber 33 7Gn�{s �hec^k t+tc��nt+er 34 . �•� 3� �ocdyear^ Service Stare +r3-�r3�t-�}yY-;T'Y+ sir^es �2��r1 1��.:3+� � 34 Lioodyear 9ervlce SLo�^e fi:,-•43:iL.�+-•49Y�-9� Llres E�rni^ c�r Y9F�. 16 i � L�ci 3?:?. tr+�Z� � Tctais 7ernp rhech tditrabet^ �� =? Tem{_�+ i.ne�r_k fvumr�er 3� y • �..� 3:� iioc�tlw2]1 indz�str9es S»c ��-ti;�67-2�9�-9:, J�rrr svc 1E?.7tt s� _ , ' . . . � ��. 7ti� F.7 T�'�tals Tenrp �heck fvumber 3;� • Yemp i»ec3r tJurnbPr 3E, - t�..� 36 H R S�crost %t3-446r1-O�r7-�� f3na1 ST-c ==<i79Y7.:, _ � 3F, ' 1 . . . . ... ., ,. . , 3� 473. 7✓ 'Tc�ta2s, Teamp �»ech lvttmber 3c> , � J r. .,. _ . .. ., _ . : - _ , - i,) Temp �Yteck tVerrnber 3"! _ �7 Sr�t2 »ssr� of � '� >Z+2-Sri�Z+++-�3p,-3o:ti '9i[.-91 [iues �12�.ct'�17. '._� 37 '3i�. L%f[ Tata 2 s Te�mp �hr�ck fvtunber �'7 i.� i'ernp �h[eck tdurnb�r 38 ) 3� Y� 5 &�1-43*t�Q+-31zt-1'id tc.ner 3�b.2.:, �A F D 9 ' .. _ _ . . �1 -43�Y+-fD47D-47A . . . � t G�t?L l^ _ ..- - ' 9i2'r. 2 � ' - 35 I Y5 J �:�-ti3YL+lt-1�r�s-1� tc»er 3�2. L'H �.. � 14ti _ . ._ _ . - - - . .. .- - - �_.- ------- - •�-- - •-- - - - - - �ih. `fa7 ' ._ • T[kt�2s TPnrp �heck iVumber 30 `•_� i'ernp �Y�eck Nurntrer 33 , � 3y I � M A R y' . . _ �1=Yh7� � - - - ._ ,_. i/13 �ayro]1^ -- ... .. 18f1.$9 - _ i �J' Fit�g 3'�37'0."+ L'l�ilfits L1st� �F>�3 1tZ�:;=� r�SM f:AY•y b7' Me>,dc,ta 1-7e2gt�ts 'i emp £:; �er_ k fdumt.ei• 39 7'ern�.+. ' �)7�r_ k 7vcrnrber� 'Jer•rGrc�t' 1Vamr? Rcr.oi�r•�t t�acte 3`3 i i: )7 'r7 Ft Y �.'�5-92:3+i...X1�Y+•-9u:• 7r3 7'ata25 "iemr it�eck tdtrrnber 37 3'ernt7 �»wcK Jr'trr7ber 'r�Zr +1L:� Srrt3 Frrst 7,UYr2CiQEt] �leY`?cs t2+2-�titifLY-��L3-A�L vm Tc t a 1 s Te.n�� ner. x tvumt�er �ve+ Temn L`�7"iecfr ?dctrnb�r tc1 �� Ynterstate �33ese] �.;1-43 ;�.3-<'r6�-3i.'� �1 Tctais Tc:n�p �:neck ;Lumt+er �1 Temp �;�ec3r Number� �� 42 F2 S gr^3rn �2 nrs �k -�.�rSQ+-�'r�°.-•�� 4;= 7_r,�p,Zs 3'Prnp �t�ec.H tvi�n�ber 4•2 Ternp �t7eck hfcrurber^ �r�; tJ3 � f �etl9lof<� .iYiC �;G-4YEic.�JY��I�'i�� 4� ?ata2s T�i,�n. �t�eck JVtrmber tr:3 7'e�np �necir ?Jumber jrsr +�4 F`�tiy )<B35G7^ Y�1-4::F`.S'-1��YC�-'3k3 94 iotals 3en�p �.Trc:r_k 1Vumber 44 Tc�n�7 �necx h1tt7l1bP_t^ ri✓ �4:'. Y'�,ax Ltrraber^ L.�7-4�3:�-33�•-3�:� +r✓ itrlox iunrf�er �2+]-433Vr-49'+h-7� 4� Y'r,ax iurn»er �1-43Q+��-¢ia3-�f� �r:_s xnax tiimner u+1-v3u+73-P+%¢+-'l� s flm Fc�trJ.s iemp �hecH �viunber . ir.:, 3emp Dh�r_ k roc+n�ber 4c`, �r6 fSrri�T.sc.n RttbblSh 8ervice �Z3-a33:�-��tniL�-fd+h GO(r71Y1C YJt S ;'i 1 3 �7a�•r^��1 .i arrni nues r^prs air» ca r�g oymz 5 �3ag-; .Xlt] SVC m9sc sp5ys rn.t sc spl ys rni sc sQ2 ys misr_ splys Jtt2 svc fiane : �y AfAC.�LtY!'G Ca4. 94 t?6�, 3:� 7� _ �:�� 7� _ f�L� 11rF�. t,+1 � �r�. c�� 1 1 J. J+C S 3 �. J�� 1i2+�.'.� ��i%r_ LTt2� 1 fi4+2�� ';^_si9. Y�t.'� 1 s 1.3 �. LrY+ 3 s 1 �✓. a'�Y z 3. 7J 1 3. 4L ��.xs ?4. 46 x:��. �+s :s3, a3 3 fiuo 7 j:a�r tFY`i � �+::='_l f'?hf Tc=u�¢ �hPCH JVumL�er 4Z T ern�_ z:.»eck nti+rni�er venoc�r^ Name ti E� . ic.t� 1 s T�nrr+ Cf'rPck ;Vcrrntre�^ Fen��r �»ecsr NurnbFt^ �+7 �7 ?»arnas r;>ruth 4�: Tno�mas J<1�1tLt) �i 'trrc..mas hnut.n i +i1 i 4�ta 1 s 'F'erar. �»erk )vumber 7en/q 'thecfc Number rr�J �4 XC�1fE�SY) 4& 7Ct�25 Te/'it(] �77ecH 1Uttmbel•^ 'f'emp Y_:hec�: 70uraher i+3 tr3 F<r^ec77s i3i'7'lce f6ach]rres 4'F.S Ftr�Chs 17fT2ce MaChli,es 3r� Tatals 'F'em¢ �37ecic 1+ivmaer^ 7er,rp �her_k fVttn�ber �t?'+ � +2+ L �' L 5 :.n7i TC•tB25 Terop 'Ct7Bt:k NUntbBl^ Temp Li�ecic Ncrmber ._,1 e� �,c�y ri+.rsxar�6er- �Y i3t�y ttt+21e71'rvEr :�1 i3t+y tttrl3 arfder 1@3 �i'C'�teT35 TE^frl� L'h@Ck )�ctl�lb2)^ Tern�r �Ylech t4urnber :1,= `%;= ieague ci' Mn �3z]es .:,:� Lc:agttP of fyrt �ltle's 1 ¢+9 T�.tals "i"em{� �Y�eck Ncr�nbe.r Cla�ms L1sr. Glsy a� taerroc�se r,r-._lgnss };ccoctnt �c.cie 4[ a'�3-•�r=�s ��-��-k�� 36-+t+� � � -0t13-•CL+'� t�m-fi4� J-i72�J- t`J •i! 7271 -�t�+ �'✓-2T1�-7L� ti t7 ¢+3-+tbE�� -1 �.a^:- 2 :� t2+� -'+13k'i2�-'� �*��j-9 .:� �t y �Z:i -tii2+"1.:� �� +�-v�rs �-x�:,-s:, Lh 1-94'JY+-•2 Ln9-��2+3 ��J-!l�%� ✓-��C�Iz-'�� 3 �1 -:.�T�l �2 -ft] �i -'P�L�'_•�$ ✓L �Gcmrme: rz s L�YY•` lr7.t 1 �2?OP_ nl^c+ 7 n71 1 ea r iicrg allcev spiys :iltxenbasl �r� t nt er� �:+r•tr �^r_i�s r�u3 aues f)li SC b7� 2 E:ETC�P_ exp i^e1mt+ prc+� nr11 eage �crg pt^em fruq o�^en� fian� za i�rnc�u»z ��3. 83 �1%.1�.� ✓3, cE SY. t[+rL ,= 36. 7F ��[ia. a',m� 1 G. HY� 'i9 6. 4� 19�. i�+4'. 195. Q�L.4 :��;=. ;^6 'J3�. 3� 1 . ;�3%. 69 :�' R.t�t7 23.r7��.. t'-•lsims :..15v �r�3 7*i+:� 9 r'�:d i:Sty' c�Y" Me��c!cta f-�elrrhts 'Yrarap rnecx rvi�rnre.r '3� Yen7p. Lt}� E+r_ k Neunber^ '✓errocr^ D4arnP r'+ccc�u»t �crie t�amrrtents .:,J 7n 7n<<rna5 iav�e2 ? u'.f 1•-•441 �-•1 1�-•2 in At+n �] 3��w •q-� Fata3 s Ternp �heck JVurnb�r �3 'TPmp �trec^it tvtrri�ner• �� Ei LeeP Rrt�s �:�1-4:3:�-31i,-:i�d Jcri svc �4 t_eet L'�rrs �h3-433:_:-•31m-7Ye JU2 svc e4 LP.P.7` R)'OS 1�e-4.�5�:`�-31i�.-6$ : lt2 S4'C 1 L+�= 'S'aLa15 Ten�� 17eck iVumbet^ :�4 YemD iY,ec:k Nttlnbar �� u Wil.ifam Ler^bs �c�1-93�'�:r-�.'�3�2r-•3�Y� exp re.tm �✓ T��ta25 7��rn�s �Yrec^k rvito�E:�er� .:,� 7'ernp LS'1P.ck NcrrAber :.,F� ��6 f9 ia r3ssc�ci ates i0i -+F3YLs�-•rr;�C+-`,�� sol ys .�6 )� Fi r�ssar_lates Y�y-43�-•�7�h-Tt��+ s¢iys �G M f-� iNsscciatPs i�,-+r32?��s-�SY1�-E� splys 1 i,$ 7atals Tenr�+ Ctrerk )vtrnibe�^ :�6 7 e.nip �;�ec?r NirrnbPr^ �? �� Lnar-ies ]+fertensc�Tta �1-k4�.'�4�-Y�3-fA3 exp r^e]rnb �r! Yc.tals 7era� �nPck fVttrnt�er• ��y Femp tr,e.cic tvumber �5 :✓5 t+lE:FiF1 �2 -l�3�-,='Y.Q�-7�h T Ra21 ��5 TC.'t8I5 Te?rd�:r LJ7ecx lvitn)ber .'..✓a 'F'en7� �heCk tVurnber :f.i • :,� f+lerrctcxa ]-1e:l�hts ia»oscape �:�3-4,:,�+t-¢��r2�+-•g� tr^ee rernaval �rj ic�tals Tern{a L'heck ?vunrt�er �9 �emp �YlEc7: Nttfnbet' 6QJ -- --- - ... - - - -- - --- • - � - � -- .. . __ .. ...__..-.._. _ .... . ----- - ------ �--._. ---.._.--••----� - --� s 4 Pa�� 3 r3mc. u nY• Y 7�. t2n2'+ 1 %�� _ iS�X� 9. 7Y tJ. G �'r `3. E1:J ,= 3_ �t�.'+ � �% fiug *9�2+ �iaims i.fsT 1=r�� 7�}.•�� t�rh Lit.y ar 7ne,�v,�ta J-IE'10hL5 "emp �necir Nurnber 6ti� iemp' �Y�eck 7va�mber Vendc•t� Nar,7e �cr.c�ur,t �ooP 5dr ]yPLY`� W6i5tP_ �C�i�t�••t:3 Y�-449'3-•¢+6Qr-��+ 6Z Met:ra WastP �cmtra2 17-•3�%?.:, 2 ;.''a� 7'cta.ls 7�n�n �t�eck fVcrr�i?er• Ffh � Temp �»Pcfc iJurnbe>^ 63 �3 t0id F�rne>�9can i� ia L'13-4:=1i�-��Q-:-�'� Y.1 3'«ta25 'Peni� �hcck hirmbPr CY TefA{7 EheC.h 7Vt�rr7bei` $'i z� f�}Adwest fit�cYc Svr �1-%f3�'-�i2+�^�-��t s` 3r L-a i s Tc<nrp C»er. x rvc+�r�raei^ E�� 5'emp �heck tJurnbPt^ �3 �3 tn2 6west tAhc2 esa3 e 7i re �1 -<t� 3�+-43i.�-•'3'�h. �3 Tcrta2s Temp �heck �vtimber 63 Tc:mp Lh�cFr NurnbPr 6%t 54 t�i2 dwest iJ:l re 9tee2 Y+i -��,:,-N7tT-7+2� 6ti ?atal s TPn1� f'lheck 7ut+mtser Ei�r Fernp Lhec3r Numt+er E�:r b�• !di 2.f P. t^ fiY^2 rrt 2»g �✓-4312'f'+-1 �'�✓-13 6✓ 7C�ta2 s 7C<n1LT �»ecK JVurnL+er 6g Tc:mp LYiecX Nurnbe�r tE 66 t�li nn 'Ge] 1 tt Y ar Ye1 e Cc Ln9 -4�= ¢��-6:i �-;:N r,f� 7h2 »n Cel 2 t+l ar 7'�1 c to rt+1 •••4��P�•-c 9�-•z� 56 Minn �el]ttlar Ye3e t:c �23-+�:^z2ff-61t7�^3+4 2S9 Tc+tats Twr,ip �neck tv�rmber� r�E iernp �heck ?Ve�rnber^ 6? 57 M2 rr»esata L3] c�ve S•rrc �DS - 13��-�Qt-•�'Y+ �am�nent s Aug sti•c Grur3 svc ]tl calSs Su2 sva t ttb� splys spS ys Scr3 svc Ju2 svc TuI svc wcrk glaves fiage 1Q Antatrn9.' ;j37 z?9: _ 74 ;='s i96. Q��cr 3ids �w3�. 66 17. ;=8 17. -.?S TY. Fk+ ? i . .F�Qr ��. ✓� 73. 1 +� 73. 14 1�9. Qf'� 134. � �2+ ��4. -� 9. 9�2+ 2 ."'.,. :JiC 3f. �� 1 �. 53 3 At+n 2�"_t`:aL9 L'2aAms Llst �r2 1YLy:25 Nrn �9iy rr� taenoaL-a tf�.i.yJ�ts �P.JY7�+ 'Z'17P_Ck iVttllJT_x21^ hi'� 'reraa. �ner_x )Vttu�he�^ benoc�' i4r7!'OP_ Faccc�unt 'CcdP 8? J01i'71�csata 731cYr•r I»t �2-43$:'.t-•�h7m'�-%i2s S% 7'}2YiT'�P_51_��c't L�IG�VP YY7C 1`✓-fJ�L�I✓-IC�G�iG9-E+1L`� l="r�'e1 Ta.�tal5 Ter�� f'}iecH 7Yt�n7L+Bl^ n7 Fc:r,�p �f�erk t�urrtbe>- 65 �8 Mtrr» t�ic.rtual L3i'e Yns ��=�'¢7'<r fCU" 1•Y1 »Yr 1�YttL'ttB2 L1 YP Y1�5 Y+1-•41.91 ^'��-�� 65 Ja#»rf ?outua� ijte Sns z�1-�ri�1-�[7¢�-•7Y:� • ��Lh4 3'otals Tenrp �»eck tuc�m5e�^ C� Sernp �»eck Ntrrnber 6� ti�J t�JiYii•r fSc:Qt c�Y' Jobs :t• 37^>iD �.f-4137-1YL+✓-9✓ 63 T�zT.als Ten�p �t-iecx Wt�mber 69 7em�+ �t�eck rourabc_r :Q i'�� rti nnesc�ta i3e»eTi t Assn �+i -�=f074 7+Z� Mii�t��s��+ta E+a_neflt LYssi� ¢r]•-•41c�2-••1Yti*+-•Y�h 7�+ Jdxrrnescta E+errepit fissn �J-4Y�I-��✓-'ZJ 7tY+ th1 ro»esata Er�nn_ i'1 L Frssn Y+1 •-•43 �� -�+h��h--4th ?z:� tol»nescta F:eneT3L �ssr� a�.i-�r331-�.�:`iQ+-5�2 7�Ze H1277nesat� fie»ef'.tt LYssir +Y+1-'49:j3•^�Z+7tA-•7t2+ 7Y� i�1,t riYiPsi.�t.3 I3erie�i t Y'tsSYr 1 ��--'�Y 3:� -�Z+E+P-E�Y+ 43f[ 'Tatals Teroo �nc�ck �Vumi�er %� Fe�np �Y>erk }JttlpYJp_1� 71 7x rfint7esc.ta iearasters tac 3t'� •¢+i-;.=�2�7✓ "12 3ata Y s 7�rr f+ t:»ecFc tvunt+er 72 i etnp �her. x Ncrrnber• T� '7:� td9.nr:esc.ta �nnway Q1-•43i7+2'.-st:;�-��2 7;� 7trta 2 s 7e>nrEs �»er_ k Nuri7ber 7c Tem{� �hec.X Ncr�nber 73 73 mc.nawsr mavir,g �• Stcr�^aoe �1-Yt15¢'%-11t2�-Y�1 Cco�irnens s wc.�i^k � i ��ves wCrk olove� Fiug �!r^em RUA D�^em F3ug pre.m R� L'ictr�d Fiur� prem r`iuri prem Rr.rg prem Fit�g c+i^en� firur.� pr,em f3t�n ui^em Aut�' prem Rug due.s sp1 ys F�e Lawe11 rnc�vt ng ex{�ense �arle :t 3 r�rnc:�crni :! �. � 3 y w. �•� ... �. 7 5 � , 3r �:�. r..:3 1 � '3EiZ. 2:�:J ,=t��. 19 37c2. Fit2� 34'�r. 4�i+ 93t�. 1 %r � tZ�. 94 �r3. Y QS :i :l �� JJ 1 � g3�+. tJ;= ,=�+t_ �$ ,'_`s=4. t2�� 1 s .:n''..b. '3i= �, R�rg a ��'� �=�^2 1+2+r�?9 H1� TPA'�� t�eac?c lvurnnPr 93 'iamp. �f-tecu Ncrrnt�er^ '�errocr^ t0a. rne 7:3 7'oY.a1s iernp �heck f9ctiaber 'S'emc. T'heck Jdumbr r 7 i i�r ;oeena» Foernar^y 79 1VP_G�Yia77 f=OUMOT'y' 7'4 TOeerrBf7 FOtrridt^y Tc�ta2s TFr,rp L'»er_H tvuraaer Tc>rnp �Criecx Nurnner 7K i:.'� Jc.t�ri Nes7�a 7�� • 'f"ot�2s 7�n�p Ct�r>cx tvumt+Er^ F�m�r L»ecfr ]yurnber 7� l5 wc.>^theJ`» 7� ToTaSs 7Fm� �heck tdumber 'feinc� �7�ec?: iJutnber 7�? 7% NCQ^7%1]E't`r� �GBtP_ fiC�WEri 77 f�a>^t»a_i^n �tatr� fiower �7 tuc.•rt»ern State fic�wer^ :�7 tvcrtnc:rn 9tatra �c.-•wer i9 fVc,rthern 9LatP fiaw�r• 77 tJc*rLtiE:rt� `3ta1e fi��we�^ .'ii roartnerl'� 3L'�7'LP. �•CWEJ" J7 }JCz)^LYBJ^l� 9tcl�P. fi��wr �^ 9'i Nc>^Y7ern 8iate fiawer 77 Jvctrthern 9tate fiowe�^ 77 Ncr•the.rn Stat'� Fawer� 77 tVc�n^Lh�r^rr �t�tP �nwer :i'� 9 Fota2s Terrr{7 �fiec.k Ncrmber- Temp �hecN lUt7n1I7P_t� 7a ?5 7Vartnern Stetr fiawer 70 fvartt�c:rrr 9tate Pawe�^ %S Ticrthern :3'GaY.e i-�awer 7f9 Jvortt�r>r» Starc: �awer C.ia:irns List �ity or Tne�o�ota t-��innts �3ccacrrrz �coe -,ry t2�9 -43Y�� -IZ+�72�-��'�.'� +h. 1 -'434+� -�2+7�Z�-•7�:� 1.:�-v 3+P�:S-'121b12'�-'E iZ� 7iF �'a1 -•�F+t�2+77,-�3ib-•�.1..0 '7�- tT1 -43a'�:'%-Y�'la2- f� 76 ��i -+a;�� 1 -3�E�-��Z �b1 ^4�1s�•••:3Y'�S•-3th �D1 --+'+:_^1 ;.?-3I �-�Y Y�2 •-4;?1 �-31iri•-7�+ 1 ✓-4c 9'� -3 9 �Z -25�2 �2 -4'c?Y L?-•3L't'.+•-•'7th 1 :�-i1'i 1'� -�/YiZ+-F.+43 S�S -4'� 3'� -'R+�2+12'+•"y+k`+ L.'+� -ti'ii 1 -31 ✓- si'.} i2+1 -•4�?1 2 •-:3:tQ+-•�0 S�1 -4c1 1 -3:F �-ik1 15-'+'�rL:t 1 -'31Q+•-�GQr �� 25--429 I -�h�'+�-�2°��.' Y+1 -4'.�1 2 -•4£'Q+-�'¢� zT.:7-+r:_11 -�f+tZ+-�2+�2 tZ+Y -^4 _2 Y -3��A-i�N �c.mme»t s sp5 ys sn.t }rs sp] ys ex�-, relmn �3re conv splys F,ug svc FILtD 51%C r'i�rg svc Frurl svc Ru� svc Ac�n svc yug avc Prun svC Fii.ig svc �ttn swc Giug svc Fi'UQ SVC �'it�g svc r'7un svc tiug svc Frug svc fiage �2 r�mattnt 9 . �336. J'r' 3'��_ 3t2 3 2+. 6 �' 1. :?7 'l.'c'J 7. :=? '.�:�. 7L� 9 ti. �+�Z+ 2tl. �.{ 443. +1tJ Y c'lY+. ��9 19�Z+. �= 3 7 OQi. 3ih 2 s :�tr3. rZ+4 3+t;_. �PQf :i 47. 63 As3�7.T� ;��. fG • � fic�rl 3:3:rka L1a�rns z1sY, f=r�.3 :t�Z+:;�J Ht� t;.tsyr or �ie,��nata rrelnhts �'enr(3 �tieck Nurrrt�er 7a 3'et,tc+_ �}� [_ ci: 7VulAXaP.i' 'JP_YItlGY^ NBlRE , /=1CG`e�ttYiti L:c�nE+ t�canatieni:s 7c3 lvct•thc?rYs ;1tat[a Fcrwr�r� ..�-1r�1�-�9a3¢r�•�+�, Fit+o sti•c � qfh Tcr.a3s 'fernp �Yiecx ntc}rnt+�r^ f8 7c:m�:+ r.nectr tacrmt�e�^ '7:9 7_i flaHcrest tter,ne3 5 �%:� -•4;=,=1 -3@'•¢+-3k'+ 3u:f svc 7� t7aHci^c et f�E:ni�e2 s �x •-42�'%�-•r3�+¢�-•��¢+ rul svc x �'.� 'f'ata] � Ternv �t�eck Num�rer 79 TPnr�a 'Ch�[:k iVtttrit�ts'r^ 8k'r � 8ih �h'y'�2Y7 'yE'Y"�'10E LC� �L�^�tu3J^�72C%t^'4R�+ CY2 tt7?^U �!?,'.�* �tz+ C+xyr�en �r_rvlce �c. Yf�X••.43{1::`_a+�tZr.».�ti¢+ cy� .ins�+ 3 r.': r�� TotaYs ierng t:i-iecic Ncrrnfter :��h 3e=rnn irheck iVulitbet^ el1 83 JefY�•ey� �3ctr^asct�ke Y+1-•�4st2�-¢,'c`�-�,:r[+ dr^y cing c:xp 42 - 7cta25� Tc>m� L'nP�k �vunr�er �1 7'P.ftR� �}7SGfi 7�iLtYi7bEx^ 5'ti S�. FY`Ch.'ttP. ic��-vtiY,3-��3a'+..�ti. splys s:� ' 7'ataSG Tc>mp �t�eck tvun�t�er ac, semp �»ec?c taurnber 93 a3 �uts2Sc £mg2 tiet t�ssn . ttl-�ift t;xrg {srem 5:s Tata2s Temp �t�ecM nttruTber� t33 Tefnp �hec:�H Nttrnber 99 �4 RaaG fi�sctte it�l -433�+-tt&ft+-•3�h. par^t s 5�s 'S"c<t�15 T�n�� EttecX fVtt&Ibgs^ :3�i Tefnp �hec7c tdumber S,:r 5:, ftcad f�cny & 4Jarpp2y 2�.,-•�433ria+-•492�-t3¢r >^pr^s . __._ -_------ ----•-----.....__�____.,.---.. _•--- - - � --- - - - ---..._T_ ....._.�__ ._ . _ _ . � fi�;�e 13 X77nCr y,lYrT <'t76. 4c . x .W_.4. i3 � �,zy. � 1 in9. 3�.� x�v.v� �x�.�� 1 i�1. ;_'✓ . , � �,u� i9� �1a2,r�s LI5't Fr3 1�O.+r�'�3 AM �ity o7' i0ei,[f�+L� t�eA�hts � YPmp Et�ecH J�urnbcr 5:� Terrr�+. , - �tTecx , Netmber Vendcr Name Faccca�r�t IIcoe 8✓ _ ' ' Tcta2 s Ternp �hec3r Ncrrrttrer^ 9:, 3'enrp �treck tvumiter £!E 56 Rettge+^s Fay iaXe Ladge fi1 -44�2+�h-C��aa'+-•;^_lt+ 5G 7'at�2s ivn�p �f�eck )Vcrn�be�^ �E ie�rn¢ �he+c3r tac+rnt�Pr 37 97 Rzrffrlcfge .Fchnscn Ect �La ��3-��=¢0-61�t+-�5¢+ 57 '9'ota i s Ten�p �t�eck Jvu�n77er L'�7 i�P.JAF+ 'ChECH NtlfllbL-'Y` ..�..5 95 9:4� Y Dft°1ce fi>^aducts it+1-43�2+-�Y�-;?�D � -- .,� 88 . � 7ata Y s Femp i:»eck tvtrniner t�� Ternp �t�ec)r T4urnbp�• 5� , tornrne»ts �3e1 rnar,t £rncy tngr La»t rent cutt9r�g aztch sp2 ys ��,�� s�. Farni.�UT'�Y. 1i:�.k?� : 1.=i. ffp2+ J.iJ. Il?14': 3e�3. �i+4'� �5:�. 7�'�¢+ 15. 4�i A 9. 43 � 89 r.'chet^fP Inc �Z+S-�4t+F2�-&arL+S'�-rZ+�lr , , , fte parxs , , � •,�52�. �¢+ � �� . . _ . . . ._ . . ------• s� _ �s�. r��+ 3ata 1 s Ten�p �heck )Otrraber £�9 Tcrnp �hecsc Nurnber � 9fi 9ar�2i:ary fit^oducts �o �9-�433.:x-Qh'++d-a'��+ cl»g sp2ys _ c='��.•�., 5tZ �=+2+s?. •� Tctals TPn�p ChPck fVcrrrtt�ei^ 9Y� � Ternp Thec}r ?JurnIIer 31 ' 53 Shade Sn r5 25ay Tree Far^rns �9-4ri64�-�2+Sr�a-r2t4� trpe maving s63.4��+ 92 1 E�:i. �Y+ 3a'ta25 Temp 'C7�eck Jdun�bei^ . 92 . . . . . - - - - - TE/Ii� LtJP.C3t TOU7Db@T^ 5'i _ _ . . _ _ ._ ' ^ '_'. ..� .w.._..__.__. ,_ _ _ �. . � 9�� Seve» i:orners facc� Ndwe S�� -+43�iJ��J7Lry-�7Z� 5p] ys 3y.:}2 y_ ` - - - ' - -- -�- " 39..=c 7ota25 'Sarnp �hc=ck Jvt+mbei^ t3L . , .i Y/L7c�' 15'-�h'�c Pr.t 3 ic+.25 i7f�f Tem}� �hecH tattrnbPr^ S3 Temp' '�'77E+Ck :acimt�er^ '�enncn• raame 93 E_ � 5��acrn»n�ssy 3'�^ 5� L £ S77�trgh»essy Ji^ 93 t_ E' :7haughi�essy J'�^ 7� L E 5haut�'h»essy .7t^ 93 L E_' :+h8t1l7:71?PSSy TY• �:� ]_ F J77c7itn7'tY�e56y S7^ 33 L f= �t-iaur»nessy J'r G:51 � Y'c.ta2s 'fernp �necf: Jvurnber^ '}'cm�. �neck tVumbei^ 34 5%r J L �ih 1 e:t By �o 9� Tcta15 Fprnp Che+ck JVtvabel^ Tern� ��ecf: Numb�1^ 9� 9`✓' Snyder t�r^ug Stores, � . 7oL-�15 Tenip CYreck )vun�ber Tehl� L't7[.cft TVttIIIYJP_r 96 �b State oT ri9 nn 96 Fatals Ternp �neck 7vunrber 7emp �t7er.sr Nurnbpr 57 57 �u» fdewspapers �? 3un tvewsp�pers 9i 5un Newspapers 97 szrn faewspapers 57 Sun Newspapers �49: % Tc.tals 7ernp �heck fVumbei^ Ternp �hecfr Nzrmbcr 39 9S 7trrT Supp2y �c. 3r3 Ftr�^f 9trpp,2 y t.c+ 1 �3L 7C��2S 7ernp �hECk )VU/nb27^ T�n�p �heck JVumtrer 39 � �Yaims i3st C1 �y aT f�Pi.data t9c_ ignts Tacr.c.car•�t �Cc.ae 71� 1-'4'21?Y+-'1 3'c -Y Q1 �n.:i-'1� �-Y �;�-•2 .:f � J_'4i�L�-2 �1�_'G�+ Tn3-4;_`'L'�+-] 3;a-A.�i7.+ cti 2 -•4L?��+-•9 3c-�QrtZ+ 1 -0-4'.?:= iL�-:! 3L?-•��V.+ :t 6•-+tc L'iZ�-• 1 3� •••iDttS 93 iL+:l -t1tl1-'2-t2:.iQ�-��£+ 94 m'+2 --934!�'J-•8�?fr+-7v7.+ S: % L'r2 -361:, g�1 fn. 7 -4;.?�4i2+-tZ�sY+-5Y+ V.+Y -�r� 4�h-�Qs�9�-'t34+ �ii9 -4',.''.iifR-Q�StT-Sc."+ L+1-4i='!R1-Q�8Q+-'S¢+ 33-ii29fh-641-�0�.'� 9J �2 -�433t2+-;�3 :�-iYr Itr2 -•r33Y+--'L'1:rTSr 9F3 m Cc.rnrnerrt s : t+2 SVC .7ir1 svc � � tt3 svc Ju] svr_ � ul svc TuY svc ,pul svc , graver FAL3P. 1 ✓ 417. y7 � 1 '7. 97 ...i r�� :�• ) �� : 1 5 _1 rr�isc splys , �. ia . � . . s. � r� _ , , - .,. .. . _ . .. ._ � . . . . .. _ . . . � . �� • • � �SQ+;�Si aaer pr^oc�er7s Jans �� 1�+�. i8 � .'S - . . , , , . ,_, Z tC:�. 78 ^ f„� -- �- -. ,� ,a .4.._ ..L: . � .... _ ._. _. . _ .ici _ ..e '= _+,<_. �..: - - �� • t»^g »c�t .Y Fr dv9 p - - ' '" ]7. � ] - � ��) 17i^g not 77e�,tlaHota 13. ✓"7 _. ' t�rg »at �onlspec . .. _ ._ . � 4. s 6 . - -- . - rirg »at lSel ta c�. 7�9 •• bId a6 85-7 35.3✓ ',.� -� ,. - - � iZ+7. 9i . _ . - ) • �i - - -^ � _ fet�t 2 1 2 �er -�- -� - - -- -� - -� _. ::� 2:11r. :,Y+ _. __ .._. .. _ ._ _ , _ 1'ertl.il..er 627.Q�'ri� . -------- � . ._, �.. _ _ . _ �_ _. . cs783.:�i2� _. ._, . -' •- _ _• r'�trg i5�e.'� Fr2 1S''+:ti.:9 rrM � Temp �heC?: 7Vtir,lbPr 9> Temp. �»eck Nttmber^ Vp.nd��r^ Narae 9'..� 3wfn C2ty Test2i^rg � ;�4'�! 7c�ta2s Ferna IIheak NurnhPr Tent� 2't�ecx fouii�ta�r 2 � 5�$ ��yiCt' TJ'c7Yt5lk.]552C�Y+ 2 tRP.r 7[tt�25 TGam� �hP_ck ldtrrOber TPm¢ Cnecx Number 1�+4 ��+] L� S t,Jest �cnurlu»3 cat 1 cros 917�Y 2] 9 West z:crnmunl r. at 1 oi,s 3�3 L' 9 LJest �c��i�rnz�rrir_at3ar�s � 1ff+7 ta 3 taest �Conin�u»1c2t.trrrs 2�2 tJ S k�est �c�n�nttr�3cat3r�r�s �ti+3 U 8 West �on�mu»ic.�tlai.s 1 s�h3. tJ :l West Lc.,��,nurr3cat.ic�ns 7TZ+9 L� 5 LaPst �anunttrri cat 1 c+n� 1i32 i.1 8 b�lest �crntaunicat2ons 2�1 U � tAest ��mmcr»ic�tloir� 2a31 t� 9 West �c..rnmunlcat3c»s Y�7 U 3 West �ommtt»ir_at2a»s ' ---- 1LYL Tcta2s Temp �hec.H Numtrer Tent p L'.Y)eck Jd urnber 3 P�r� � 2�c• tfn3Torras t�rr121rtitetl 9 �'i Tata2s T�mp �heck tvun�t�ei^ Temp �t�ecX Number 1�3 ' sm:� t�»2tea �entral Trz+ssee 1Yva L�»2 Led �Pnt�^a2 '!'�^usteP . 3�.s Uif3t�d L'er,tra3 Yrcrstee 1in3 L�»lted �entra2 Frustee� 91L Tcrta.7s '!'emp �f7eck 7Vumber , 7emp �»eck 1Ve+n�ber 1�2'r4 SS�4 t�ns teci >Jay 9t fia�r2- i �t1 Tata2s Ten1� �f�eck 1Vuinbei^ C2�7itns LiSt �C2L•y ��f iqerrooLa 1-7a_2gnts Fvcr_•c�+.rrrt. �c�de fA `3 -48:5 F�-�72+inYa-'� P+ 55 i1+1-433¢+-a 3tZ -?ti? 7 �+f2S L.'+x -4:= x'/c�^ 2:t 12 - 7>L�' Y+3 -4L 2 ti�-Q:��-�;?� �T ] -4;=1'Q�-OyQ+-st� ¢r� -•a29 Qr-•2 u�✓-•7 � 7 :�-9:a 3'A-�IJF.rn-• 67h i2+1-4'2X 0-tih3+h-•3tS '¢+1 -4;^_ 1 Y�-tZ�✓2+-@Y+ 1 .:�-+4L 1 �7+-�Q+61A-6� y2+1 -4',�'1 t2�-thi5!+-i� �2'+1 -4:31 ti'+-12��tt�--�7Z� � .:�-tii?1II+-2�F7b^S+h �1-�)� 1 PC+-t�7Tn-7Q+ 1 tZ� y Q+9 -4k1 rn-Q+�-`+2+�-�:�7+ 'i Q!L fi1 =�4+ii ffif -42 3��-^@L�-'tc"'� $+1 -%+1 ?'�-Y��P.�-�,� 1Z� 1-413c -¢�77t+-7�h 1 Pt3 g+1 _`'Q+1�+ 1 i214 " �cunnre»t s s_n11 teSL Y^OJ'S Ri+g svc Rug svr_ Fttrg svc rai+n svc fi��g svc i�ug svc t-iirg svc Fiug svc Fiug svc r3t+g svo F+ug svc Atig svc 7/71 SC t3.3Y^1 bCk pc�g prem r`+ug prem Fvirr� pr^em fiic�r3 pi^en� fiage �E. F'ihlC�itiit cT4. Q+IZt �'T 4. 4�'S� x'36. 5+2� 3 36. 9�+ �3s_ 75 4�*2+. B:✓ ✓�. ._r4 9 :�7. :�x 5fn_ � & :t � tA. 98 � �J� ✓� 3:�, 49 33. 113 2 4. 3 c'� 14. �9 1 �4. 3E! , 1 S c71:1. 8�4 57. � Si. 5� 1935. i24 �7. 97 13. 77 ^cY. BE! 3iD'2. t 125 Fitt� co»tr^ ',�27.68� •21'7. Faf'� A .� . � rticrg 7:+:>Yr,+ F'l^3 7�'+t.?`� T77d Te�n� �he?ck fdcrr,rber 1�.:f 3arn{s, L'Y/eP[.`X t+>c+mtTer ti*er�Ocv^ Nan�e 9ar: ✓e�^nJeer- ' 1�:': vermeer �iih 7"��ta�5 TEn��z �t�c:c7t fVcr�n�er i'envp �:�ectc 3vumt�e,- a�E �*bf.+ in131dar Fum{� ] zd6 Tc•ta 2 � fPn7{, �»eck lvunrber iemp �»ecfr rvzrrnAPr 1Q+: 1tZT b.}�+st W�2d a,n� west aa�a a 1i�i WB5t ZJ�Id 3;=1 Ttta15 Tern�+ �heok lvunrber� i2l17(� �tYBCit TQttl+it,7Bt^ 1S�.Q.. 2Z7$ WP5LBY`Y� L2lP. I7?5 1 tZ+9 TaCaSs Temp C»eck fVumbQr ierpp t:riF+ck TJuraber ]GY3 1a'a5 W2riz17rctp ic� We#rrst2»e ��J W1��thrcp c4 4ac�i»sG1��e 9"+i+t3 i41Y+throp 8• 5Je3nstl»e 1'LrT3 f91MLf1Y`G>�? L. tti2�7't5'�1Mt2 A� 241 nthrc�p 8• t�Je3 r,st,3 »e �'.:tJ Yi:.tals 7e�r,r{.+ �heck fvumt�ei^ Temp �necX tdcvaber 9 3 *ts 59Y� Tee MedAca2 8vc �� T'ata75 Ternp �heck Nz+mtaer• 4 3�ZtF3 aranct 'scY.az f Ye.a2n75 L:RSt �1'Cy c.�7' tne��iooL'� r,eSr,�rits Faccaur�x £:ane Y+Y -•433�2'+-•tt9�-•7'th f�� ^•�33a"'+.».:�tJi?�-�t2� :� m� ] ✓-�4334'�-49P+^��,L.K xm� �1 -tt3Yr'.",-tZ�'¢+-�'Y.+ tL+Y �-�43�"�,`3_.�7�27-'7ff+ 9 :s-43Qr✓^ih6Y� �-G Q+ 1 �.'+7 8+1 -413',�^it+31-3ih � Y�$ it+2 -4��'.?2 -1 L�-1ID Q�2 -4'�c'"2'+-'1 i=�-'Elf1+ �J2 '"9��`Q+-1 �aS+-�i'2r 26-ft't��?Q+^1''c}�-•Yt�tt� - Y+1 -J4;..�'.-_,�.'�.-•1 L='�^z.R� 3 Y�9 tb� -43a+�-�2+:��-�ib 2 j Y� �c..mrne�7t s p,�i^t 5 par^Y. s rpr^5 Ncrx?�1 anci sp9 ys s pg �r� sp]ys fiTitC� (J!^EhT JttYr svc , 3'ui�[f Re !it»sliigtois J�m fte £agle R�r9ge J'ctn ft� fitti^1 �rtg Ju»d pr^a�eccrticr.s sn� ys _. . _ � fierL�E 9 7 GSrnc�ttr�t � 2. Ei�M :33. E,� � 12 . :.',�:�+ ;�� 9e. ��? ,=� �irE:. 3'i 3s.. 3Tc'r :�}f5. 3iXr 35. ��N 1 9 �4 _ 34 � 37_ £iZ+ A ..'ii. E.Tt� .:rQ+2 . 9th 'c2s 299. ;?YZh 793. St?l - '�1 . 6iT+ 2s;�G:?.9� sts ��8� �fl 'a.�.l. Er�r �-� . s:� 1?� I � '7'T'2. 6i'?' ' . i, --_.,........"".,.._-"-�.. �..'--"_...—"-......�__.�._.v..-"^'�'-'-_.-........._...__.._._...��.»._.._.--,.�---'---`_----_....__.. ..., .-,. ,—.r..,..... y. ,..— . M1INUAL CHECKS 12732 180.00 Traphy Souse So.ftbaZl 22733 195.Op Diane Ward " Z2734 42.00 Sennep.in Cty i•larrant 12735 7,747.56 PERA 6/29 payroZ2 22736 3,667.32 SCCU 7jZ3 payrolZ 12737 SOQ.00 Dakota Ctg Bank " 12738 13,050.58 " " Z2739 3,029.85 Co�uissianer of REv " 12740 3§,999.18 Pagrol2 Afc " 22741 1,000.00 Prank Fabzo zefund escrow Z2742 ZSO.OD Mn Dept Healt perrai.t 84-7 12743 170.00 MPCA " 22744 4,20p.00 Eugene Lange deferred comp 12745-753 285.00 saftba2Z umgires 12754 46,356.25 American IVatZ Bank bond pymt 22755 SOtl.00 SLEA zegr Wicks 12756 3,b6�.32 SCCU 7j27 pa�raZZ 12757 93.75 AA Rubbish .Ist qtr I2758 Z,239.52 LMC Ju1y p.rema.um 12759 7,229.28 PERA 7f13 payro.23 22760 .Z3,664.40 Dakata Cty Bank 7/27 w/h Z2761 3,355.08 Ca�t.issioner of REv " 12762 500.00 Dakota Ctg Bank " 12763 38,693.85 Pay,roZ1 a/c 7/27 gagroll Z8b �.ZZI . 03 G. T. 9.Z3, 883. 85 � ,� -: �. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City FROM: SIIBJECT: HI3TORY Au st 2, 1990 r Admi ist�,�""�- Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer Salary Reduction Program For some time we have been looking into a Salary Reduction Program for our employees as permitted by the Internal Revenue Service, Section 125. Most recently, in September 1989, we were authorized to obtain proposals for such a program. Since that time, we have met with several insurance companies and administrators that offer the plan and its administration. Most are very similar in the proposal, and to implement the plan we should approve dealing with Legal Systems Service Corporation to develop the final plan for City Council adoption. Dzscosszorr The Legal Services Corporation offers a custom plan for the City rather than the form plans of most other vendors. The plan is fully compatible with our payroll system (Doug Banyon's) and all work will be handled in house through the payroll system. (The only plan that offered this convenience). At this time, some 20 employees have additional deductions from their pay for health and dental insurance. Total additional premiums are some $23,000 annually. The City's savings in FICA Tax on this amount would be $1,780 annually. While the initial cost of the Legal Services plan is slightly higher than most others, about $4,600.00, the long term costs are lower than most. The additional front end costs relate to the custom plan. The costs drop each year into the plan to an estimated $1,400 annually by the fourth year. Based on conservative estimates of use of the plans, City savings should be in the $4, 700 per year range initially growing to $7,000 by the fifth year. Attached is a summary of the services offered by Legal Services. We are particularly concerned that they assume responsibilities for the annual IRS filings and discrimination tests. Several steps would be taken to approve such a plan. 1. Company meet with each employee to explain plan and what expenses qualify. � 2. 5et effective date (as early as 9/1/90). Some employees are very anxious to get the plan set up as they face child care and dental expenses which are very substantial. ACTION REQUIRED Approve dealing with Legal System Services Corporation to develop and establish a Flexible Benefit Plan for City employees. (Formal plan would be approved by resolution when developed). LES:kkb Attachment � ; � LEGAL SYSTEMS SERVICE CORPORATION 5353 Gamble Drive, Suite 125, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 Fax 612-546-9239 • 1-800-328-4827 Ext.1373 612-546-1777 WHY INSTALL A FLEX PLAN? . A QUALIFIED LEGAL WAY TO AVOID TAXES we are suggesting that you take advantage of a twelve-year old = section of the Internal Revenue Code that provides a legal way to avoid paying taxes on many out-of-pocket health care expenses, health insurance premiums, dependent care expenses and life insurance premiums. This is accomplished by saving payroll taxes; and increasing the value ot the compensation you are providing your employees. WHY LEGAL SYSTEMS IS THE RIGHT CFiOICE MOST COMPREi�NSIVE ARRAY OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Comprehensive package of legal and accounting service to eleminate the need to purchase expensive outside professional services. Plan Documents• ° Documents are ugdated on an ongoing basis according to current regulation changes. They are for all areas of benefits of Section 125: health insurance premiums, dependent care expenses, out-of-pocket medical expenses and life insurance (term and/or group permanent) premiums. ' The Summary Plan Description and other needed forms are available for each employee. Annual Filings: � ° Preparation of the 5500 tax forms for the IRS �� ° Filing with the U.S. Department of Labor . 0 -2.- � 1990 Legal Systems Service Corporation SOOa !! � Annual Discrimination Tests: ° Section 125: 25� overall test ° Section 129: 25� dependent care test ° Section 129: 55� dependent care test ' Appropriate rec�mmendations to maintain plan legality Legal and Tax Consultation:. ° Unlimited consultation regarding any legal or tax issue which affects the Flex Plan Legal Responsibility for the Plan: ° The law firm of Rossini & Dunder assumes full legal responsibility for monitoring all of the accounting and legal issues which affect the Plan, and takes the responsibility to alert clients about changes which are required from time to time. ' ° written peer review of their plan to insure that it is in compliance with all pertinent laws and regulations has been successfully completed (copies available upon request) Employee Tax Advice: ° Tax advice pertaining to the Plan is provided to the employees. Payroll System Consultation: ° As changes are made in the laws and regulations, Legal Systems consultants work with your payroll system experts to ensure that your system is optimally handling the regular changes in the rules and regulations. Employee and Spouse Orientation: ° One of our highest priorities is educating your employees and their spouses regarding the optimal usage of the Flexible Benefits Plan. ° Initial presentation in small group meetings ° Follow-up meetings on an individual basis ° Home phone service for employees' spouses who were _ not able to attend meetings ° Employee 800 number question line -3- � 1990 Legal Systems Seryice Corporation SOOA EXCLUSIVE MEA ENDORSEMENT After six months of research and evaluations, the MEA exclusively endorsed Legal Systems because they determined that the operating system and services provided are significantly better for their members. This sponsorship alone has had a major impact in gaining the employees' confidence about the value of the Plan. The MEA's local leadership's active involvement in the communication process is a major asset. � Alve Jemtrud, MEA Director of Member Services is available on a direct basis for questions at 1-800-642-4624 or 612-227-9541. PRICING OPTIONS EACH YEAR ° Fees That Go Down: Due to the minimal administration burden, the cost after the first year and thereafter decreases significantly. Adjusted for increases in the number of employees and inflation, costs are 60� of the first year fees, then 30�, 27� and 25� in the fifth year and thereafter. ° No Risk Option: A three year revenue sharing arrangement provides that the first $2000 in employer FICA savings is allocated to Legal Systems and all additional FIGA earnings are split evenly between the employer and Legal Systems. -4- 0 1990 Legal Systems Service Corporation SOOa CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminl��y�r FROM: �..John P. Maczko 'Fire Chief SUBJECT: Permanent Fire Fighter Appointments DISCUSSION- August 3, 1990 On August 1, 1990 two firefighters, Tom Shields and Tim Oster completed the one year probationary period. During the first year on the fire department there is much time spent in training the fire- fighters and evaluating their commitment to the department and to the community in providing an excellent level of service in firefighting. . Both Tom and Tim have shown a strong commitment to the fire department. They participated satisfactorily in the monthly training, squad cleanup assignments and have met the requirements in the attend- ance of fire calls. Both firefighters have also completed 72 hours of Firefighter I training on their own time to help meet the commit- ments of being a firefighter. RECOMMENDATION• The Executive Board and myself strongly ers Tom Shields and Tim Oster be appointed to the Mendota Heights Fire Department. ACTION REQUIRED: recommend that Firefight- permanent positions on If Council agrees with the recommendation they should pass a motion appointing Tom Shields and Tim Oster to permanent status on the Mendota Heights Fire Department. JPM:dfw CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO August 3, 1990 T4: Mayor, City Counci3. and City Admini or FROM. Klayton H. Eckles, Civil Engineer �� SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets Mendota Waods Job No. 8922 . Improven{ent No , 8 9, Praj ect No . 7 ! s�i�.��i�� A Bids ware received and opened far the Mendota Woods improve- ment project on Thursday, August 2, 1990 at 10:00 A.M. Only three bids were received and all were above the engineer's esti- mate of �S`121�540� as shawn below: Brown & Cris, Inc, $136,885.00 F.F. Jedlicki, Tnc. 164,321.00 Carl Bolander & Sons 363,803.40 The developer has asked that the bids be rejected and that the project be rebid this winter far construction a.n the spring. As it is very likely that� mare and better bids would be obtained by waiting, staff sees the develaper's request as valid. RECONfMENDATIdN • Staff recommends that Council reject the bids for the con- structian of utilities to serve Mendota Woads subdivision based on the low number of bids received and the high dollar amount of these bids. ACTIQN REQUIRED• If Council wishes to implement the staff recommendatian they shoul.d pass a motion adapting Resolution No. 90- , RESOLUTION RECEIVING AND REJECTING BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE MENDOTA WOODS SUBDIVISION {IMPR{}VEMENT NO. 89, PRdJECT NO. 7j KHE:dfw City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 90- RESOLUTION RECEIVING AND REJECTING BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE MENDOTA WOODS SUBDIVISION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 7) WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvements to serve Mendota Woods subdivision, bids were re- ceived and tabulated according to law and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Brown & Cris, Inc. $136,885.00 F.F. Jedlicki, Inc. 164,321.00 Carl Bolander & Sons, Inc. 363,803.00 WHEREAS, there were seven planholders and only three of the seven bid the project; and WHEREAS, the above bids are more than 10� percent higher than the engineer's estimate; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has recommended that the bids be rejected on the basis of the number of bids and the amount of the bids; and WHEREAS, the developer has requested that the bid be reject- ed and rebid at a later date. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mendota Heights that the bids for the above project are hereby received and rejected based on the reasons stated above. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 7th day of August, 1990. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk :• �: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 31, 1990 To: Mayor, City Council and City Admini�� From: Paul Kaiser, Fire Marshal Subject. Eagle Ridge Condominium Appeals Hearing Eagle Ridge Condominium is a 3 story, 54 unit building, with an area of 60,000 sc�uare feet of type 5 construction. The building permit was issued in November, 1972, three and one-half months after the adoption of Minnesota First state- wide Uniform Building Code. During the occupancy of this building from 1973 until 1985 there is no record of inspections from either a Building Official or Fire Marshal. From 1985 to the present time, there have been periodic inspections by the Fire Marshal. Two orders issued b}� the Fire Marshal are being appealed at this hearing. Those issues are: (1) Standpipes and (2) corridor protection. The right to appeal orders written under the Uniform Fire Code can be found in State Statute 299F.011 Subd.5A. Additionally, every inspection must contain a statement explaining the right to appeal orders. In the absence of an Appeals Board, the local governing body becomes the Board of Appeals. Governing bodies are not liable for damages in connection with granting variances, abatements, denials, or modification of orders from the fire code that are made in good faith. DISCUSSION The Standpipe Issue When the first State Building Code was adopted in July of 1972, there was little consideration given to the needs of local fire departments. At the "urging" of the State Fire Chiefs this attitude changed with the adoption of a new Uniform Building Code one year later. The 1973 Uniform Building Code began addressing the needs of local fire departments. One of these needs, and still a code rec�uirement in 1990, was the installation of Standpipes in buildings that were three or more stories in height. A Standpipe can best be described as a vertical water delivery system located in a protected area with Fire Department connections at each level of the building. This device is installed to facilitate extinguishment of fires regardless of floor level. During a 1987 pre-plan assignment for the Fire Department the issue of installing Standpipes in this building was raised. The need for Standpipes was based on the following factors: (1) lack of access roads to two sides of this building, (2) large set-back and incline that hampers access, (3) lack of fire-protection of floors one through three, (4) type of construction, 5, and (5) the larger fire loss which can be expected from time lost dragging fire hose to the building. The 1988 Uniform Fire Code, adopted in October of 1989, requires Standpipes in existinQ buildinas three stories or more in height. (an existing building is one that was in existence at the adoption of the 1988 code) If this building was bein� built today, the Building Codes would require this a Standpipe system plus a total automatic fire protection system.(sprinklers) Other than fire extinguishers and unacceptable hose cabinets, Eagle Ridge has no fire protection devices. The Corridor Protection Issue Corridor protection can best be described as an " escape tunnel" which provides protection to persons exiting a building. All doors opening into this corridor from any other building s�ace must be protected by an assembly (door and frame) having a twenty (20) minute fire-protection rating. This was a building requirement when the building permit was issued in 1972 but, perhaps, it was missed due to the newness of the first State Building Code. Several areas in the Eagle Ridge Condominium do not have this required protection. These areas located on the first floor are identified as: (1) party room, (2) exercise room, (3) storage/custodial area. This deficiency of inadequate corridor protection is cited from the same section of the fire code as the stand�ipe issue, Appendix 1-A, "Regulations Applicable to Existing Buildings". Over a period of five years, The Eagle Ridge Condominium Ass'n. has installed a complete automatic smoke alarm system, a 6" water line with valves to supply the garage automatic fire protection system, door closures on all unit doors, and numerous smaller deficiencies. They have been pleasant in all our contacts. For several years, the State Fire Marshal would hear appeals from the appellant after the appeals had been heard and refused at the local level. Because of budgetary A- � constraints, this practice was discontinued in 1987. As a guideline only, the State Fire Marshal would consider variances from the minimum requirements of the fire code if there is substantial compliance with the provisions of the code, the safety of the public and occupants of such building will not be jeopardized, and undue financial hardship would result to the applicant unless such variance is granted. Based on a March 1988 estimate to the property owners by Carlson Automatic Sprinkler Company, the cost for the standpipe system is under $15,000.00 or approximately $275.00 per unit. Corridor protection could add about $25.00 per unit to this total price. Liabilitv Concerns: In considering the present appeal, staff is cognizant of the potential liability the City may incur should the appeal be granted and a future incident results in loss of life or property at Eagle Ridge. City Attorney, Tom Hart advises that should the Council grant the variance, the City should request a signed petition from all owners/residents at Eagle Ridge acknowledging the Cit�'s order to install the standpipe system and enhance the corridor protection measures, and their request for a variance from said order. Such written petition could be a defense against future claims against the City based upon an alleged absence of good faith. RECOMMENDATION ' The orders currently being appealed were originally written to correct a life safety concern which existed, and still exists, at Eagle Ridge Condominiums. It is my recommendation that the orders be affirmed and that the corrective work should be completed within a reasonable period of time. ACTION REOUIRED Council should hear presentations by myself and then by Mr. Rollie Crawford, an attorney representing the residents of Eagle Ridge. After discussion, Council should consider a motion to either affirm the orders issued or to grant a variance exem�ting Eagle Ridge from the requirements.� Should the Council wish to grant the variance, the motion should include justification to demonstrate that the decision was made in "good faith". In addition, a motion to grant the variance should also include a request for a signed petition from the owners/residents of Eagle Ridge acknowledging the order to install the improvements and their request for a variance. s r � z , CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS I.s�_ -l�u�i] August 3, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini� FRQM. James E. Dani.elson, Publi.c Warks Dire o Kevin Batahelder, Administrat�ive Assi SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-25: Heaver Devel.opment - CUP for Fill DISCUSSION The Planning Commission canducted a public hearing at their July meeting to consider a request from Mr. Keith Xeaver to allow some fill to remain in Mendakota Estates and be utilized ta construct some landscaping berms. (Please see attached memos). At the meeting, the main aoncern of the Planning Commission was the poor quality of the fill and its cantent of rubb2e. The residents o�' 909 Mendakota Caurt were present and expressed a complaint that the existing fill had been deposited and not graded to drain, nor is it being maintained. Because of �his it has pockets of ponded water that are breeding grounds far mosquitos and high weeds are prasent. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Comma.ssi.an voted 5-1 (Morson) ta recommend approval of landscape plan contingent upon the follawing canditians: 1. That al3 the existing fiil be remoyed and the landscapinq berms be constructed wi�h good quality clean fill. 2. That all the bituminousa concrete and metals be disposed of at a praper recycling facil.ity. 3. That this Pill not be relaaated anywhere within the City 1.imits of Mendota iieights. Chairperson Morson opposed because the he felt there were toc� many removal demand�. ACTION REQUIRED Conduct the public hearing. If the City Council desires to implement that Planning Commission's recommendation, the should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 90 - ,"A RESOLUTION APPROVING CUP FOR FILL AT MENDAKOTA ESTATES". JED/KLB:kkb City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 90- RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR FILL AT MENDAKOTA ESTATES WHEREAS, Heaver Development has made application for Condi- tional Use Permit for reclamation for the purpose of filling greater than 400 cubic yards of earth (Ordinance 401, Section 4.12); and WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on July 24, 1990 to consider said application; and WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission recommended to the Mendota Heights City Council that the requested Condition- al Use Permit be approved as proposed in Case Application No. 90- 25, subject to the following conditions, said conditions being: 1. That all the existing fill be removed and the landscaping berms be constructed with good quality clean fill. 2. That all the bituminous�concrete and metals be disposed of at a proper recycling facility. . 3. That this fill not be relocated anywhere within the City limits of Mendota Heights. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the proposed Conditional Use Permit would have no adverse effect on the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the community or surrounding land and that said Conditional Use Permit for reclamation accord- ing to the plan submitted, in Case File 90-25, be approved sub- ject to the said conditions listed above. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 7th day of August, 1990. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MEND.OTA HEIGHTS . � BY � Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk C� 909 Mendakota Court Mendota Heights, MN 55120 August 1, 1990 Phone (612) 688-7684 Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk City of Mendota. Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Ms Swanson: We will be unable to attend the City Council meeting of August 7, 1990. We would like to submit this letter describing the situation and condition of the berm material behind our house. We live at the above address which is also Lot 8, Block 3, Mendakota Estates. Ours.is the only house on Block 3. We attended. the Planning Commission meeting on July 24, and aze in agreement with their recommendation that the rubble be completely removed and replaced with clean and acceptable fill material. We have no objection to the formation of a berm behind our house as long as the berm does not impinge upon our property, does not affect the drainage of our property, and is completed in a professionally landscaped manner in a reasonable (i.e., rapid) period of time using clean, safe materials. When we spoke with Engstrom Development company in early May, they assured us that they were going to do a professional job. Mr. Heaver is a neighhor for whom we have a large amount of respect and whom we are sure will do such a job. However, like the Planning Commission, we are upset with the quality of materials presendy lying behind our house. It contains large boulders, re-bar, concrete blocks, asphalt and bituminous material, bricks, and some dirt. The land in Mendakota Estaxes is fairly sandy and water drains into the ground quickly. However the recent rains have formed puddles , in the rubble which have not drained, have formed algae puddles and a breeding ground for �:: mosquitos. We are concerned. that if this rubble is allowed to remain and is covered with a layer of soil, the drainage will be poor, grass and trees will not grow well, and the landscaping will _. , fail. ' In addition, there is a utility easement at the rear of the lots in Block 3. Presently this is occupied by a Cable TV wire. We are concerned. that the berm will make this cabie inaccessible when repair or further hook-ups aze needed Please ta.ke this into account when you consider the berm. Finally, the present rubble has left a strip about 4' wide between the reaz of our lot and the beginning of the hill. Weeds several feet high have grown there. When the area was mowed m to remove the weeds earlier in July, no attempt was made to remove the weeds close to our lawn. We cannot mow them down as they are too tall and the rocks that have rolled off the rubble will damage my mower. In addition, a strip along the sides of our house, ahout 4' wide was also not mowed. We assume that in both cases this was due to the use of a tractor that could not get close to our lawn. Could you have these areas next to our house mowed. LML/lml MFII..ETT.008 Sincerely, o� �,�. oC� � Janice and Louis Leichter CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 19, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire . Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist SIIBJECT: CASE NO. 90-25: Heaver Design - Landscaping CUP DISCIISSION The center island lots for the Mendakota Estates development have been selling slowly. They are very flat lots and the Developer, Keith Heaver thought he could make them more interesting and marketable by adding some landscaping. Mr. Heaver's landscaping design includes some landscaping mounds along the rear lot lines. The fill for these mounds exceeds four hundred (400) cubic yards, the maximum allowed before a CUP is required. Mr. Heaver was unaware of the requirement for a CUP, and the material for the mounds has already been deposited. Mr. Heaver has commissioned a well respected landscape architecture firm to prepare the design (see attached). Staff feels that the proposal as request will be an excellent improvement to the development. Our only concern is with the material that has been deposited for constructing the berms, it has a good amount of ruble in it and could cause some trouble in planting the trees. Staff has also received a call from one existing home owner on the island, 909 Mendakota Court. He expressed a concern that all this landscaping be off his lot and that the drainage not adversely affect him. It appears from the plan that his desires will be met. ACTION REOIIIRED Conduct the public hearing and make a City Council for the request Conditional Use suggested conditions that should be imposed. JED/KLB:kkb recommendation to the Permit, including any � Y PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION RE(�UESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 24 July 1990 90-25 Keith W. Heaver Mendakota Estates, Block 3, Lots 1 - 9 Approval of CUP to Deposit Fill in Excess of 400 Cubic Yards 1. T'he subject property is part of the Mendakota Estates Subdivision located south of the Mendakota Country Club. These lots are located on the interior portion of the subdivision and are not contiguous to the golf course. As a result these lots have remained undeveloped, while the rest of the subdivision has filled in. The applicant proposes to create an amenity for these lots by constructing landscaped berms along the rear lot lines and in so doing, market the lots more quickly. Constructing the berms will require more than 400 cubic yards of fill, which requires a Conditionai Use Permit under Section 4.12 in the ordinance. The i�tent of this section of the ordinance is to allow the City to monitor and control the type of fill used and to i�sure that it is properly installed. The ordinance specifically states several issues that conditions of the permit should be directed to regulate: type of fill, rodent control, fire control and general site maintenance, vehicular ingress and egress, control of material dispersed by wind, and hauling material to and from the site. The ordinance also states that grading and fill can not adversely affect adjacent land. 2. Lot 8 of this block has been developed and the owner has i�dicated that he is not opposed to the project, though he did not want any alteration to occur on his property. The grading plan should be do�e so as not to direct any additional storm water onto this lot or alter it in any way. 3. The fill that is to be used on this project has already been deposited on the site. I have been out to the site and seen the material. Though I did not inspect it closely, the material appears to be a dark loam soil that co�tains large sto�es, concrete chunks, and other debris. In her letter, Joan Albrecht, representing Robert Engstrom Companies, states that they will be sifting out the larger fragments of stone and dressing the berms with a layer of black dirt. We generally recommend that fill for use in the top 2 to 3 feet of landscape berms should be relatively free of large stones, co�crete or asphalt chunks, or any trash or other � debris that would impede the growih of plant material. Large is defined as greater than 6 i�ches in many landscape specifications. In addition, we recommend a minimum top soil layer for turf establishment and shrub beds of 6 inches. The applicant should be required to work closely with the City's e�gineering departme�t to insure that the fill _ c �� Mendakota Estates, Case No. 90-25 Page 2 used is an appropriate material and that any large stones etc. are removed from the soil before the berms are constructed and disposed of appropriately off site. 4. This property is very flat and the City was cautious about how it was graded when it was originally prepared for development in order to insure proper storm water drainage. The proposed berms if not carefully graded, could obstruct the flow of storm water off the property. The applicant has submitted a grading plan along with the recommended landscape plan, which also shows berms and drainage that do not correspond with the grading plan. If we assume the grading plan is the more current of the two drawings, it appears as though the proposed berms are designed to allow storm water to flow between them and off the site to the southeast. This is consistent with how the site currently drains as indicated on the plan showing existing grading, which is included in the materials submitted with the application. This issue will be addressed in greater detail by Jim Danielson in his report. S. As mentioned earlier, the landscape plan submitted by the applicant shows different berm configurations than the grading plan. The landscape plan may need to be revised to represent the current berm location and drainage. On the landscape plan plantings are shown i� the depressions between the berms. In order to allow storm wate� to flow unobstructed, an area betwesn the berms should be maintained without plantings, edging, or mulch. Generally the plant species selected are hardy and attractive and a plan similar to the one submitted by the applicant would create an attractive amenity that would benefit both the future homes on these lots and the existing neighborhood. 4�i . �, .. . . . ';:^`3¢'= �.� �"?Y..�:::�4�t, '4;:: .. , : ":•hi: ' • • :a',=. .� .i. � '.t' �.>� : �. - . . ��t' :•r'.' 'a . .w'�.,'�<. ;}'� V � , "�!T•,,`, 'tr' ' , ' . ' ' . -. .. . • _ - . . �: c' � � • ` � ♦ .+� .� ` �+ • • • +► •; � . � � � � „/.s air �► • +� ♦ ♦ rr. �. � s,�, � ! . � ; urn'�"w�+es.�r s«��wr�.�.r +�'�' � � + � `'' � *. i • � t,� _ ' . •' .� 1 � •• �' ..f'�� ,� s � .� _ �, �„ .� '-, . � • =s +�' "� ...__� . - t -"'7�..Z.�►. • � � _ � _- - ' .�� _- � .�... ..��::.,: . _ �_ ..__� i;,:;:�:;'��} ... ._._. �Il�r �. + �1I� �!�— - �. _ ':� . � �—� � M � .�� V-�" +�r 5U8JEGT � PROPERT i N� .. � t�RTH - __ ,� scA�E: �"=200� . ..�ri.�- ,�..... -.. _. �s��r� .�r..- .Y��► M�.— .�.�w�r �.►• . �I��Mr • — +'�► . +�� r•�1► � r �ii�� r �.... - ..� �►' . • .�. � �..- .rw • - �""�. .�� '� �� - �"�.�. .... "M��MfF�� .�+. �� • . � �"""'-... _1�ti. 1^W� � T � w j t } • �•. ( � 4 � � l j ' � ! j� � � : 1 � i_ NGRTi�ERN � ; STA�'�$ P'01A►�A � . sus •s�r�t�� o+� � � � ... .......... .. � .........,,..,,..` ! i � • ��. + � Ir'�� = r! �� „ :�' � �I , � jj/ /f ,• � � : .,, i �� 11 i/, ��'� 4� �� jt � b _ t{ \� t1L ' _..ru�'�\�\� // /.fi �"�.. .�'�, �^'�--�,._ �.. L t ..._._.. � ... ...J • t� _ • � r ,y{.f�.. ` 1 ..:: :.;' `:y hc.l;*�: .......,..E �.;,t �c, \ '..;�:''.'q;.'i:a"`,fi3ti.",x�9yn ;". i `�. �..,,�;;;��y�.�� • ,,.::;� ry::".[.n�?;;':�'.�••�'`� ��y�..r�'s��y ¢: / ..l �6. " s�y' " x� ��.L'E?�;+.? ;• : �. �:L. :<X ✓� = Kyn��ry,� i ; 3, �.i.sas. ,� ' . a�. � • � (; i � :e��.��t;.',:;i,k � ��f:a;;�'y: �'" , } 6j • i � � ��Jy��'`�� ` ' • ,%',x,,p'� • : � i 3f »)'G'.�'.,f^' A`l = •� �"^wM�..^w� t • j , ' • +� � ,.,._:. . ..., ... ....... ....... � ......,.. .;.... ......., �, J � , ; S � � � � � ,� -a--i . . . . . i�.........•.i........n.......w........A.....•A�Xi: � � ; �.....% .. ...... .... ..... . . ...�.....................w�-a�r, .. �, � i i€ ...s•..:.vw�•� .. \ � `„ .., � ' �":.'�• f fL .• £•: ?`'4 �:.'�i ","'"""'W"..t+�. � : , �• Y � x . � ir�� 's : K ``. � , `: ; .....:a.�.»..,�,� > , < �, t ... #... ; , : E : i j � : • � ' � ' 1 ` � S i i :Y<:: � � _ .............. .....•.� iww ww..�.+..w.u..................... . .....• �y.n. .. ..,. . • . • • : • � � ' �y�ly � : . : ... . u r .' ' � : . : . . a.�s�i.� : MYt: ... • i .O.w.v.�..... l\ � ... � i : . . /' r � i . ..� � i . � . . � . ; i ^".`, ' `... /v�+� O �T /'"� 'I � � i � . .> �.... # \ / r�V �e � 3 ' • 3... � � � t ..A. .�i.. � . ......�» t � � O � , _" �.. .i.. � ..... y.. • � � � � . i . `� : . .....a. ... t.. .,a m �' i ' • ;,,,,'.µ, � i �p ; .� � � � � � • _ � Y y,�,� 4<,.�., ��, O _,,,�.._, ........; � � 3 ...............� "^ y{ ` '\,�� ... S �••t � 1 � � � i t L q '? •,�. ' �h.,` ..7 , �L'M,`.rn �.1 ! ?T�1 ,�' 1�,�• �'7{ � P•'3 s�F � ,. , a . ......�.♦•i......�.�. t.. . .,....V ... ,� K .. � .. . .. ...... ..1 �....� � " . .. '.... .. ... : ..'": �.........µ .�.�...;....... ��'' ��• ... .I.,......_ � ... .:' . � , � ��• "�: •::: �:::::,. . .... ' .� -�-�."' .•� �•. ...�.. �,r...�: r.........i .. \ .� i ` ::�...� .. e �� . � ••.,, ..:.�...y ., .......z.... � ' . ' ,� �;� ' ' , .; s. . - . , �a; , . 3'• � �`�. . � . �_ : �j . ' , . .'. • +;..'vi �, � .. 1 � y s�-c4 ..,�^ �n �... '"t " r .� iC'. � . . . `'r+ �` ��'%�.�� . ' �f i:�•t' ` ^�«y,�")•� , " , � e ` .;�; ; `\�,,�� `,\, ``` �` `��. .��` �``` .,,; : ; ;;; , ` �''g � �� , t� � f� !�^ �"` � Jl.,� �� AY � r #�J 3 ., fyy��..�, � I nr July 3,1990 Planning Commission Gity of Mendota Heights Dear Commission: The Conditianal Use Permit proposed beFore you taday is for Iandscape unprovements in the Mendakafia Esf�ates development. I feel the unsald ioi� in this develapment require upgrades - they are flat, treeless and have an open view of the adjacent NSP substation, I propose cunstructing a scries of low bern�s to better define the yards' spaces and add charac�er io each Iot. The planfi.ng plan continuously follows �Ehe island's center property line, buffering fihe backyards fram each ofher. The iarger trees will be moved in with a#ree spade, and the remaining trees, shrubs, and flowers will be container stock. The existing grading plan should no� be adversely affected. The grades have been manipulated very carefully to ensure thai water drains appropriately off the site. Each berm has been streamlined toward the direction the water originates. The lat which has been built on will not be included in the landscape improvement plan. The fill which has been brought in is a sandy loam, peppered with boulders and other debris. We will be sifting out the larger fragments and dressing each berm wifli a layer of black dirt. The planfing area will be mulched with shredded bark. Please ca1l me with any questions you may have. Sincerely, jaan b echt Robert ngstrom Companies (893-1001} ��►�l�lt C ity o� 1Viendota I-Ieights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANIVING REQUEST CaseNo. `-1�-0+'�J Date of Application -�- Fee Paid �SO.CYJ �.3-�-�'�j?j Applicant Name: �7/��./-4U�� /`��T�� . PH: (I.ast) � (First) (Mn Address: �� /�/��U/.�/.ZoT� � � r!�// � /��% .�.j � �d (Number & Street) (City) ,,� (State) (Zip) Owner Name: , Address: (Number & S�reet) (M� (City) (State) (Zip) � Stieet Location of Property in Question: T� Z..cJ,(%4�0 ,Z,/��L<;��j�s /��' � �� ,�1��1� 3 Legal Description of Property: Type of Request: Rezoning _� Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Plan Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable Ciry Ordinance Number Present Zoning of Froperty r. Present Use _ Proposed Zoning of Property : Proposed Use I hereby declaze that all statements made in material are true. Variance Subdivision Approval Wetlands Peimit Other (attach explanation) Section this request and on the addi ' nal (/v J (Si ture of Applicant) (Date) �it--�'� , � . dL�-G. (Received by - Title) � 1101 Victoria Cu�ve -1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF BEARTNG �7'tzly 16, 1.990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GxVEN that the Mendo�a Heights City Council will meat at 8.00 o'clock P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, an Tuesday, August 7, 1990, in �he Ci.ty Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, to cansider an application from Mr. Kei�h W. Heaver for a Conditional Use Permi� for land reclamation with �ill of more than 400 cubic yards to construct a landscaping berm on the foll.owing described property: Lo�.s 1 through 9, B3o�k 3, Mendakata Estates Mor� partiaularly, this property is located at Mendaka�.a Drive and Mendakota Court. This natice is pursuant ta City af Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Such persans as desire to be heard with reference to this request will. be heard at the meeting. Kathlesn M. Swanson City Clerk 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING July 5, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: 0 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mendota Heights Planning Commission will meet at 7:45 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, July 24, 1990 in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, to consider an application from Mr. Keith W. Heaver for a Conditional Use Permit for land reclamation with fill of more than 400 cubic yards to construct a landscaping berm on the following described property: Lots 1 through 9, Block 3, Mendakota Estates More particularly, this property is located at Mendakota Drive and Mendakota Court. This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Such persons as desire to b�e heard with reference to this request will be heard at the meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk City o� ...1 .� 1Vier�dota Heights July 20, 1990 Mr. Keith Heaver 875 Mendakota Court Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mr. Heaver: Your appl ication for a C(� � �a r- �-t [� � L{p� c.0 ��ill be considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, ��y Z�{ The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, �� Kevin Batehelder Administrative Assistant E�i-��:�;i:7 1101 Victoria Curve -1Vlendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 .. .. C ity o�r . �. � �, � 1��.e�dot� Heights AUguSt 3, 1990 Mr. Reith I�eaver Heaver Develapment 8?5 Mendakota Court Mendata Heights, MN 5512�0 Dear Mr. Heaver: Your application for a� V t�' �, c- �� l� wi1.l be � corrsidered by the City Counci.l at their ne� regzilarly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, �u �5t �� . The Counail meeting starts at 7:30 o'clo�k P.M. here at City Hall a,n the Counca.l Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on .. a�tending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Gounai.3 consideration. 'The Planning Commissian recontmended �,P�rz�J�,l o� C.U� �v"-out�.� �x ts �'iK� �i li t� fic�r�towex9 0,� k o� ��cUoi� ��t��-�'S ati..9 Y-c.p 1�.� ca. ��. c le.�.n a�..ro 1��-.{ � ll , tL.G.'� y4�,.�. ,� t�-v � �4.o us, # e oHe �rc. 4e aw� w.�e.�-G-t b.�. Q�-a(3�c.�r-�.., ��S on�a.� • If you have any questions, please feel fr�e ta contact me. Sa.ncerely, CC,�-�.- �w.�,�.�.�.- - Kevin Batchel.der Administrati,ve Assistant : . 1101 Vietoria Curve •,1Vi.er�dota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452•1850 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO August 3, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-26: Con/Spec - MIST - CUP DISCUSSION Mr. Jerry Haarman, MIST, has requested a one month continuance on the hearing for a CUP for Participative Athletics that was scheduled for a hearing at tonight's meeting. The has encountered some difficulties obtaining financing and wishes to wait until a complete package can be brought before Council. ACTION REQUIRED If Council so desires, at the developer's request, pass a motion continuing the public hearing until 8:00 o'clock P.M., . September 4, 1990. JED/KLB:kkb �� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO August 3, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council, City Adminis�x��`_/�' FROM: Richard Gill Code Enforcement Officer/Weed Inspector 5UBJECT: Weed Cutting INTRODUCTION At the July 7th meeting, Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Nelson asked for a variance from the City's weed cutting requirement for a parcel of property that they and other residents would like to rem natural. The Nelsons also submitted a petition from severa •t�� residents in the southeast area of the City. The Council referred the matter to the Code Enforcement Office for a report and recommendation. INFORMATION The weed cutting requirements are generally enforced in those instances where complaints are received or where weed height in excess of the minimum allowed height has been observed by the Code Enforcement Department. Many sites in the City have been routinely exempted from enforcement for various reasons. The request of the Nelsons and their neighbors is not unusual and is understandable. There is little question that the weed ordinance needs updating. The community has experienced considerable development since the ordinance was adopted, and attitudes of the residents towards retention of natural amenities have changed. As an example, many property owners are now planting prairie grass, wild flowers, etc., in their yards to provide natural lawns. We are not proposing any new ordinance language in this report. We have developed a list of possible exemptions but feel that Council discussion and direction is necessary before an ordinance amendment can be prepared. It should be noted that the exemptions should not be allowed if noxious weeds are present on the properties. DISCUSSION The following is the list of potential exemptions for your consideration: 1. Wetland Areas; steep slopes exceeding a 3:1 ratio or where weed growth provides erosion control; large n undeveloped praperties and wildlife habitats; nature preserves and portians af private properties adjoining nature preserves; unimproved areas of City parks; and State owned properties, large rights-of-way and ditches where weed growth does not impede traffic visibili�y. 2. Wooded areas. If this exemption is allawed, we suggest that either a definitian af wooded area should be written or that waoded area exemptions be determined by the Weed Inspector. 3. Partions of residential lats with designated natural areas which have been planted with decorative plants such as prairie grass, wild f3owers, etc. It is suggested that praperty owners be required ta formally request an exemption and that a renewable permit be issued by the weed inspector. The term of the permit could be three to five years. t.If Council feels that an exemption section is appropriate in the ordinance, I would recommend that the weed inspeator be authorized to grant the exemptions. It would na� then be necessary for CounciZ to review every request far exemptian, and the reques'ting individuals would n�t have �o wait for a determination an whether weed cutting is to be required. Staff recommends tha�t the Council review the proposed examptions and give direction an whether it wishes ta consider a praposed ardinance amendment and which exemptions are appropriate. If the Cauncil a.s desirous of an exemption amendment, I also recommend that you authorize the weed inspection department to begin to issue exemptions in advance of adoptian of the ordinance. Ii this is acceptable, the Nelsons and athers who have requested variances would not have ta wait far an answer to their request� unt�il the ordinance is adopted and published. ACTION REQUIRED No action is required other than Council direction on how to proceed. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS I'1 ' � August 3, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis�f"V'�,` FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-28: Heaver Development - Wetlands Permit DISCUSSION Mr. Keith Heaver, of Heaver Development, appeared before the Planning Commission to request Wetlands Permits on seven lots in the Ivy Falls Creek Addition at Brookside Lane. Mr. Heaver has attained individual Wetlands Permits on three lots in the subdivision and wishes to have Wetlands Permits for his remaining lots. At the time of subdivision and platting, the Wetlands Permits for these lots were overlooked (see attached memos). At the Planning Commission meeting, the Commission expressed concern about soils correction, preservation of the water table and trees and the impact of grading. Three of the lots, lots 4-6, Block 2 are adjacent to a storm water holding pond that is protected by a drainage easement (see attached drawing). No construction or filling would be allowed on the drainage easement. This means that no filling should be allowed beyond the 866 contour (see applicant's grading map). RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend that the City Council waive the public hearing and approve Wetlands Permits for: Lots 1,2,3,5 and 6, Block 2, Ivy Falls Creek Addition Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Ivy Falls Creek Addition with the following conditions: `1. No fill allowed below the 866' high water level for the holding pond. 2. That care be taken so that no degradation occurs to the water table. � ; 3. Care should be taken when grading is done to preserve as many trees in this area as possible. ACTION REQUIRED If Council desires to implement the Planning Commission recommendation, they should pass a motion waiving the public hearing and pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 90 - ,"A RESOLUTION GRANTING WETLANDS PERMITS IN IVY FALLS CREEK ADDITION". JED/KLB:kkb :IST p,,,",r � D Q. 'CH �"� L�'. W . ��. + � � , � 90� SCENIC �ANO � ORAiNAGE � EASEMENT�� 1 � 6 � �II � � . i � , ., 20� UTlI.ITY � � � / �EASEM£NT � t ' � {r 1 1 l.! � � / � � � � �, o e � ��r� � — ' o � !44' � � 1 � � T8 9 �P�ACE � j � RIP-RAP �� O•TEXTl�E j 5 ��FABRIC � % � / � � {- Sfl0 � � . OVERFLOW � � J � T86 � �� W I ! i � � 4 / �'�APPROX. FUTURE HIGH �7 � WATER MARK / I 1 . � 90� �---�►� ' 1 . . -.- C�lVSTRUCT $�dCK � � �IKE — i SOETAIL � 3 � � � � � ' ::�::::::'::::::';::::::' : �::�:::: .:::'.' :�:::::f'.::::::":::::' �:�:::::::`:::::�:::::::' ::':::'::'::':::...:::::' ::':::::::':::::':::::::� ::':::::::':::::'::::::" ::"::::::':::::::'::::::� -• ................... .. �... ...... .l �............ ... .............. ...... ............. .... .....»... ....... .. .--•................. ...... ......... ... . . ..................... . .. .. ..._;..1 j....... .:_..;............. ............... .. ... ....... ...., ..................... , .................. , .. ............ .. .., . , 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAROTA COIINTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION GRANTING WETLANDS PERMITS IN IVY FALLS CREEK ADDITION WHEREAS, Mr. Keith Heaver has applied for Wetlands Permits to allow construction on seven lots in Svy Falls Creek Addition, said lots being Lots 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6, Block 2 Ivy Falls Creek Addition and Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Ivy Falls Creek Addition; and WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission considered the said Wetlands Permit application at its July 24, 1990 meeting and waived the required public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of a Wetlands Permit for the said lots in ivy Falls Creek Addition, subject to the following conditions, said conditions being: 1. 2. 3. That no fill be allowed below the 866' high water level for the holding pond on Lots 4, 5 and 6, Block 2. That care be taken so that no degradation occurs to the water table. That care be taken when grading is done to preserve as many trees in the area. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that a Wetlands Permit be approved for Lots 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6, Block 2, Ivy Falls Creek Addition and Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Ivy Falls Creek Addition subject to above said conditions. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 7th day of August, 1990. , i, 1, ' / , � . 1 •,� ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 19, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire � Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis SIIBJECT: CASE NO. 90-28: Heaver Development - Wetlands Permit - Brookside Lane niscvsszorr Mr. Keith Heaver, of Heaver Development, is requesting a Wetlands Permit for seven lots on Brookside Lane, those lots being Ivy Falls Creek Addition, Lots 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6, Block 1 and Lots 3 and 4, Block 2. At the time of subdivision and platting, the Wetlands Permits for these lots were overlooked. Mr. Heaver has had to come in for individual lot permits for three lots, however, it was suggested that because the entire area is identified as being within Wetlands, all the remaining lots could be considered at one time to avoid the delays caused from having to get individual permits. This has already been done by the City for the Copperfield, Hampshire, Kensington and Bridgeview Shores developments. Staff suggests that Wetlands Permits be granted for the following lots within the Ivy Falls Creek Addition with setbacks and grading limits not to exceed those as shown on the attached site plan: Lots 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6, Block 1 Ivy Falls Creek Addition Lots 3 and 4, Block 2 Ivy Falls Creek Addition ACTION REOIIIRED Meet with the applicant to discuss his Wetlands Permits and consider waiving the public hearing. Make a recommendation to the City Council on the Wetlands Permit request. JED/KLB:kkb .. _-- �'' • ' �' r �'�LANNING REPOF�T DATE: CASE NUMBE(�: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION RE�UESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 24 July 1990 •� : Keith Heaver Ivy Falls Creek Addition Block 1, lots 2,3,5 & 6 and Block 2, lots 3& 4. Wetlands Permit 1. The applicant is requesting a blanket wetland permit to construct homes on the lots listed above. The subject parcels are part of a subdivision which was previously approved. The roadway for this development has already been built and two of the lots have homes on them. The property is located in the area west of Somerset Country Club north of First Avenue. Directly north of the property is a City detention pond, which is part of the City's storm water drainage system. The City's wetlands map, a portion of which is attached to this report, shows most of this subdivision within the wetland area associated with this pond and the small �irainageway that runs through the northern portion of Somerset Country Club and slightly to the northeast of the subject property. While the applicant is requesting a permit for Lot 2 Block 1, it appears as though this lot is actually outside the wetland area as outlined on the City's Official Wetlands Map. In addition, Lots 3& 4 of Block 2, while within the area designated on the wetlands map, are situated nearly 20 feet above the elevation of the detention pond. These lots have mature upland vegetation and are clearly not typically wetland in nature. 2. Section 6(b) of the Wetlands Ordinance (402) requires a permit for construction within a wetland area. The ordinance also requires a permit for excavation over 100 cubic yards and tree removal. All of these activities either have been or will be conducted on these lots as they are developed. The criteria for determining whether an action is permissible within a wetland area generally focus on minimizing the potential impacts to the environmental character, or the water retention or flow capacity of the wetland or drainageway. Many of the important factors that determine the amount of co�struction, and therefore, the impact on the surrounding environment were established when the elevation of Brookside Lane was set. The grading plan included with the applicants submission package illustrates the fact that significant grading and fill was done when the road was built. While there is evidence of substantial tree removal in the area, the proposed building pad elevations are appropriate based on the elevation of the existing street. -,;�,,,�: , �:. Keith Heaver, Case No. 90-28 Page 2 � ,.-� , 3. Lots 3, 5 and 6 are the closest to the ponding area and drainageway. Based on my review of the grading plan included with the application and a visit to the site, it appears that much of the tree removal and excavation necessary to construct homes on these lots has already been done. If no additio�al tree removal is necessary to construct the homes on these lots, there would be ample vegetation left to buffer the existing homes located to the northeast from development on this property. Lots 2 and 3 of Block 1 will likely require additional tree removal and grading to prepare them for development. There are single-family homes on the lots directly west of Lots 2 and 3 and the grading indicated for Lot 2 may leave little vegetation for screening in this area. Care should be taken when this grading is done to preserve as many trees in this .area as possible. 4. The ordinance requires that the lowest floor elevation of buildings located within wetland areas be at least 3 feet above the highest known water level. In this case, the water level of the retention pond is controlled by a storm water outlet at elevation 862.6. Lot 5 of Block 1 is proposed to have the lowest basement elevation at 870.5, which is 7.9 feet above the controlled pond elevation. 5. While the Planning Commission is not necessarily legally bound by any previous decision or action, it is important to consider the applicant's request in the context of the existing conditions. The subdivision has already been approved, the roadway has been installed, and two of the lots have been developed. In addition, much of the work for which the permit is to be issued has already been done, e.g., the tree removal and grading. To make the approval process more effective and efficient the issues related to wetlands should be considered during the subdivision approval process and the necessary permits issued at that time. This way the Planning Commission can have some meaningful input and will not be placed in a position of rubber stamping a plan where many of the important factors are already determined. �� __y � � � � ,� � I � ' � � � . �, ' � � • • � .. � ...a�".�- , _ � ,� _ ... / '� � � � • 1 � _ t- '� • �c , `J �' - . . ...._ , � , - _ � � � .�.� � �,;„� i � � • Yr � •� -- � i � � � - � � a � �:�_:' � , -....... . � ,�► � ', f;; �IC' i .,�► � � - i .., � (� � ♦ � ,�ry� 'e�'�' . � � w 4�.!:"'M.- , � . �,�-;"�:., -�----_, � � ^r� : �``'•'• ' `' �.•T"• - -..._� ' • � � .;:.✓:�.•.•�.'.•'•'.•.+':•."��'..�.,�. :.;.� � . � � :;..:•:;•.: ~ • '•.r' �';�x��'� ,, ;:i� � � � , � • • �. . I ��,� 1 r � .�... � • • • � � � , � '� � # � • � • �, ♦ � ., • U � M _ a ♦ ,.... � • ♦ 'f • �"' • \` � I�••1-� o ` • W� N � � � __ ' m n _ r .� ��._ � . i . f . . . . ' ': s .,'. '� l` . \`�, ,r'` � :"i , •. t �'< : � / �\ ��! �rjt��'T` . ` ` � � : �li � �, 1 �./�'i��,�� F .... + ,,, � � � ..... .. .� • . a �.,--''L. F"f j f � . , s „� /" ..�c� 1�� `�} .fi.... ..... .'± �� , ,�� \ ^J � •�` . , : . / , ` . i i . � : •.....,.. < ..r � ,. r � `4 : ...t : p„ �^,�f • # �. a � � „ , � s,,,,..,-• •�ta0 � .*.......t . � -.� , � �� 4 '� }` .. ,.. �� w,�,..�0.. ,` ....� � .q � '� �,.:_........ � � �„.. ' ��, �� \ ssa.Ptfi r'w�ey^''Y ^"�` , 1 i � �. � �"'� + :.�.... � � � ; � 1 . . . : �� _ m"" , •�,, � � ! . ; � ; ..;r`, $84a `�� .. ' ��.., �•�•..... : •...... : , � .. • , S� . .....,...,.. �. , , � . "':,...... : y \�t_/� , � ; . • � � {... ... � Rf � _...,.� ......-.Y' °�- . . �`~ �n � � ..� � , ;. J V � ; ..�... ..�. _.. :�� ... . .. ' .... .... . ;� �`�.� ` Q��` � � . .. .>. "�" ..�..........� , $�o .,� .. � .:...........:r ., � , �y . � �....� ! i \� , �i '��' �Y`c / ` � . f _',��.• -.... ..... � � �'" , � .M.. 1 L ' p' �"` �Y` ;;� *�; : � . ,;, r � . \ �;•.{ K' . ' , ' �r i j` �i`` ' 'i.�� c' r .....i,, i = � . � �� . .. j � t � ..� ., .. <. �. � ; w� . . :; � . , " •r "`~—_ t � ' �` � ... �.. ,,.,,,,,,.....,n,.w.,,,„„M ,.,, ». � , • �.. l' t., ... . i: ,;,�. .. � � ... .., t , ... 5... .. I)C�:aa+ 4 �...w'^+w.» � .. ... ' . .. . " • �� ,a��,h�� -'��,i �� .. 1 � :C'i :`a:.- . ��-� ' �:� ` � • L•c7 i j ♦ .Y�:�'�' / i � r.:"A•s ` `. �c^' . l:<`�� *;= "�''--�--•_ ---�. =�....., � ' �`�;,<t°n =."r,,::. ;?�'• `,� M.... • . E ' � � `:�-�" 8R `' - - - CT �:,��. oo�s, F � :u�2;;;,4;13.t ,,��'s :�2;,;�'i-''" ' � ��;o� '^t...<. h� i?2 '.+e%� ER �� ....�.... .. M.. � . a�. �... rY �..: �x:k :_. �.. ... - �� $ - . .. ., K... .�.. .�.. : . .� : : ......... � � . . . . . . , ......... ... . - . . ............. . . - g � � ... . F .i...... : , ...�,. ,^� S'. . .�,,,,,,,� _. . ..�, : ., �'.w �:� :,� i• t.. . ... 01 ; �_ .. . : : . ... � . _ ?�z:� :"�:.`�;„;�.�"�w,:x,;,� i..,,.,...r,�,,,„ T��; `" ,.. p .. ...�. :l •• • � "=5pp� . „ s _.r..�v.�:��;�x� f ~,� � � ..�..,,.. � �.. ...... �d+ „Q . � ` ..r.. .�, . �..�.;:�.��. �.,�� .� ¢� �n� , : �,. `, : � ...2� t...., i.. ...4- �; �� ...�.... : k " . ., �. ...a��..,,.� .. : .......... ,,. .. ; ; , ... : . - •s- a�,�. � sa 3 v � , .i r � �`"�...•,... ....: � ....e.... . r ... .....�....:; > .� . . , ;.. : ...- ; . •, n,._,,,,,,..,.: • {}yS ... @ . ^ j ; . . . ,1��t. '�,,. �"'Y, „A4 •� &� �-w'"w,....,.,,d �' . .. � � i... : . � � ( ' � i f .k i: � ... . �,. .+.yn,. .;�.. .x I�..r�.,,� �pS:I�- ... w... ..;. t i.w� � �...,.....� %h . ,. ' q ' �/j�} ` i ? «.*-µ.v.: j ; ... j': ,'�`y' 9�t�.:....:.....; ; : �� , , s Am{� p � i-�r�--..�,......,..,. ��.�;....:. ' ..f � ,„ ., . . 1 I� -r°-^^^�,...'^'�""""� : i !, 'e,:.;•r , . ' . ... . ; � .., : �� —�.,.., �.. # . � ' . � . i ; i : i . : .�. � i ` ��...... � ... � :,....,�. ,/'? { ..�...,,,,,, • . � .... ; ' � � ` i ' � � � .. . ...... � �' 3 �... >. .. � , t ~ � /~ . _`^= i�'n.,....... ... '``'�� . i ; +. . .� .i�.�►��♦ Applicant Name: Address: `� Owner Name: C ity c�i 1��.endota. Hei�hts AFPLICATION FQR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST (I.ast} {Nt�mber & Street) (I.ast) Case Na. Q� - �%� . Aate of Application '�=! 1�--�Tt`� Fee Paid �.n�"`� '2-2C.� •�..T; � �,_,._ �� .J PH: (� �i`�'-�� a (First) (MI� .�`L �`� �f�i(� � � � �Y P�_ �{Ciiy} (State) (Lip} � lCj �t2 (First) (M�} Address: .� � j►�t.`.� (Number & Street) (City) {State) (zip) Street Location of Property in Question: r�a K*��Df�2.. �,� y�v Legat Description of Properry: � r-=,� • �- �s .`� `�'�,. Tyge of Requesc: Rezaning Canditional Use Pemnit Conditional Use Permit for P,U.D. Plan Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City i}rdinauce Ntxmber Present Zoniug of Property Present Use _ Proposed Zoning of Property : Proposed Use I hereby declare that all statements made in this request materiai are ir�e. Variance Sui�division Approvai --_7�,. Wetlands Permit Other (attach explauation) Section (Date ive by - Title} 1101 Victoria C�urve • IViendota Heights, IViN � 55X18 452 • 1850 - C ity o� .�,, l, � _ 1Viendota Heights � APPLICANT NOTIFICATION FORM � 7-3— �o Applications will be scheduled for consideration by Planning Commission and/or City Council only after all required materials have been submitted. Late or incomplete applica- tions will not be put on the agenda. � t �2,T � G�. �n cg � �� C'� �cv� f � �.5,,�l:�L �`�,'��:G�"� t'`� . For your planning request, if proper and complete application materials and supportive documents are submitted by: � Jvl..� ( a, ��l�n date then the public hearing, or review of your case, will be conducted by the: Parks and Recreation Commission date Planning Commission 5�� t (D date Following completion of the public hearing, or Planning Commission review, the City Council will take action on: NOTES TO THE APPLiCANT: . ��e,�.s - �, �. 0 �� - �� date ;�� h ll L�7'f�1"f �,: ,� �--��.. ��:� Nt� : ON� 5ic�nc��ks�'�P c� C,��1�.P'� �� .�� a.�� 1 3(.C�-c.�P • � � � 1101 Victoria C�:�rve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 � C it o� y .,.1 �, � 1Viendota Heights August 3, 1990 Mr. Keith Heaver Heaver Development 875 Mendakota Court Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mr. Heaver: Your application for a W�'��ati�-S �c�.rw��'�i will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, ,/�c,us-�- �1�' The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. The Planning Commission recommended a Q�arovo►.l .r �k� 3 �6NC�'c."�10V:�i . 1 � �1.\� �WOd�t� �l r1 V`fP�(G�' dV�O►'rl` ��b,J � G�e.Y"'� � �`F-�1^ �o-T V�o �'4�CJG�.TtOth 'b '�-a- �..f4TC.�i '�vJ� C7CGv'r �J �0.� � �v-c t'c{-�-5 • If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, �,�-.v�-�.-- Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS u1��[i; August 3, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini t r FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-21: Batesville Casket Company Building Permit DISCUSSION Kiesland�'Development Company was before Council last meeting requesting variances, lot division and a building permit approval to construct a new office and warehouse for Batesville Casket Company. During the course of the discussion with Council, Kiesland switched their proposal to have the development on another lot. Council tabled the matter to allow time for Kiesland to modify their plans to reflect this new proposal (see attached plans) . These new plans have no new variances so they have not been reviewed by the Planning Commission. ACTION REQUIRED Review the attached plans and then if Council desires to implement the Planning Commission's recommendation, they should pass a motion approving ten foot (10') parking lot setback variances for Lots 3 and 4, Northland Plaza, authorizing a lot division subdivision subject to the completion of a Certificate of Survey accurately identifying the new lot boundary and authorizing staff to issue the building permit. JED/KLB:kkb ' • . C ity o� .�., �. � 1Viendota Heights August.3, 1990 Mr. Bruce Jones Kiesland, Inc. 1624 Hillcrest Avenue St. Paul, MN 55116 Dear Mr. Jones: Your application for a�L��Q � ��_, o,•t , Uo�.rcA� c-e. will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, v us`� �. The City Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. If you have any questions, please feel fre� to contact me. Sincerely, l�^-�- � Kevin Batchelder � Administrative Assistant � KLB:kkb 1101 Victoria Eurve • 1Viendota Heights, 1VIN • 55118 452 • 1850 MEMORANDUM DATB: TO: FROM: � RE: D' ' ''D � . p e. INCCIRPORATED CONSULTING PLANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 300 FIRST AVENUE NORTH SUITE 210 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 G12•339•3300 3 August 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Tim Malloy Batesville Casket Proposal Lot 3, Block 1, Northland Plaza When we last reviewed this proposal the applicant was proposing to locate the office warehouse faciliry on Lot 4 adjacent to the Highway 55 ROW. The site plan for the current proposal is basically a mirror image of the previous plan. We met with Bruce Jones, architect for the pro�ect, at the July 23rd office hours to discuss the idea of locating the Batesville facility on Lot 3. We recommended several items be considered when preparing the plans for Lot 3. The current proposal still utilizes a shared driveway and, as a result, still requires a li variance from the side yard setback for both Lots 3 and 4. As discussed in our original report, this arrangement offers several advantages from the standpoint of traffic � flow on Northland Drive. T'he proposed location of the building offers several advantages. Due to the shape of the Lot, the building will be oriented such that the corner entry faces the d'uection of the intersection of Highway 55 and Northland Drive, thus offering a more dynamic and attractive view from these roadways. However, the plan calls for the loading area to be located on the highway 55 and I-494 side of the structure. Until development occurs on Lot 4, this loading area could be visible from Highway 55. The impact of the view of this building is diminished by the fact that the structure is located over 420 feet from the travelled lanes of the highway. To further decrease the impact of truck activity from Highway 55 the applicant proposes to construct a temporary berm in the northern portion of Lot 4. When development occurs on Lot 4, this berm would be removed and the new building would screen the loading area of the Batesville warehouse from Highway 55. In addition, landscaping is shown near the entry of the structure and on Lot 4 to further screen any view of the loading area. The landscaping on Lot 4 is located such that it would not be disturbed when the lot is developed, assuming development on Lot 4 follows the layout shown on the site plan. There are no sections indicating how well the berm on Lot 4 would screen trucks and :� , •�` Bateseville Casket, 3 August 1990 Page 2 loading activiry from Highway 55. However, a quick analysis of the proposed grades and the e�risting elevation of Highway 55 indicate that the berm provides adequate screening for vehicles approaching from the south along Highway 55. To �better screen the loading area from vehicles traveling south along Highway 55, the berm could be improved by extending it further toward Northland Drive and increasing the height slightly. ' The landscaped berm located along the south property appears to provide adequate screening from the I-35E ramp and I-494. T'he landscapmg on this berm has been improved from the last plan by the addition of several more evergreens, which are distributed along the length of the berm and concentrated where the loading area would otherwise be most visible from the freeway. The plantings along this berm are also located such that they would not be disturbed if the building is e�anded in the future as shown on the plan. However, it would probably be necessary to install a retaining wall along the southern edge of the pavement in order to preserve these plantings from any damage that would result from regrading the berm to accommodate the building addition and increased paved area. The section drawings included with the site plan are somewhat difficult to read because they are attempting to show more than one plan of vision on a single drawing. However, they indicate that the proposed landscaped berm along the south property line will almost entirely screen trucks and loading activity from I-494 and the I-35E ramp when the landscaping is established. No setback variance would be required for the building as located on the site plan. The future 10,000 square foot addition, as shown on the plan, can also be accommodated on the site without a building setback variance. The site plan for the proposed Batesville Casket Company office/warehouse shows the appropriate proof of parking as does the layout for future development on Lot 4, assuming the mix of office versus warehouse footage is similar to the proposed Batesville building. The exterior materials and detailing of the current proposal are almost identical to the previous plans. Additional details in the form of inetal banding and metal accent squares have been shown along the side of the building and over the loading bays to help break up the monotony of windowless walls. The current proposal makes several improvements over the previous plan and the relocation of the building to Lot 3 creates no additional problems and offers some distinct advantages. Generally, we believe the applicants request is a reasonable solution for this property. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO , August 3, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini r FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works D' SUBJECT: Excess Right-of-Way on Lot 35, Willow Springs Addition, Job No. 8922 DISCUSSION• Dr. David Rischall owner of Lot 35, Willow Spring Addition is selling his home and the new purchaser's title company has identified an area of City owned property that comes close to their home (see attached drawing). The new purchasers desire to have any unneeded City property returned to the lot. The School District owned the lot in 1970 and dedicated the land in question to the City. The City's records on the transac- tion are minimal. It appears as if 40 feet of right-of-way was dedicated along the east property line for the possibility of extending Warrior Drive north to connect with Marie Avenue. Staff suggests that this 40 feet should be retained. Another, approximately 60' X 105' portion, was retained at the northeast corner of the lot to allow for the possibility of making Callahan to be made into a cul-de-sac should the City not want to connect it to Warrior Drive. Staff does not feel that this cul-de-sac option is a likelihood and recommends that this portion of land could be returned to the landowner.' There is also a 70 foot wide permanent slope easement along the east property line that can be vacated. Dr. Rischall has paid the easement vacation fee and staff is making the appropri- ate public announcements to hold a public hearing at the Septem- ber 4, 1990 City Council meeting. Staff has not discussed any compensation for returning this land to private ownership however the City recently purchased an easement from Dr. Rischall along his westerly property line to install sanitary sewer for the Warrior Pond development (see attached map). We paid $1.50 per square foot for land outside the setback areas and $0.75 per square foot for land within. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the cul-de-sac area highlighted on the map be declared excess and be returned to the landowner. The total area of land within setbacks is 6.780 sq. ft. X$0.75 = $5,085.00 a possible fee for return to landowner. ACTION REQUIRED: Review request with landowner then if Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should pass a motion authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached quit claim deed on behalf of the City and determine if compensation should be paid. F . � � BRENNER LAW FIRM, LTD. o¢ �co`essfonnC o�{aaocLaELon BLN OFFICE PARK, SUITE Y70 200� KILLEBREW DRIVE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55425-�822 TELEPFION E: 18121 854-7600 TELECOPIER: 18121 854•OS02 LOUIS W. BRENNER RICHARD A. GLASSMAN JUly 3O� 1990 KATHERINE M. BERGENTHAL' THOMAS J. BRINK MICHAEL J. ORME �AL50 ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN Jim Danielson City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Re: David Rischall Dear Mr. Danielson: This letter will confirm our recent telephone conversation in regard to the property owned by our client David Rischall. As you know, David Rischall is the owner of the portion of Lot 35 Willow Spring, Dakota County, Minnesota. It is my understanding that the remainder of Lot 35 is owned by the City. In addition, there is also an easement over the Easterly 30 feet of the property owned by the Rischall's as contained in Document No. 380382. At this time we are requesting that the easement for roadway purposes be abandoned. We are also requesting the City deed to the Rischalls that certain tract of land owned by the City. It is my understanding that the City obtained title pursuant to a deed from the School District. A copy of the first page of the deed dated December 15, 1970 is included herein for reference. I have also included a copy of the title policy showing the Richalls as owners of the property and a plat drawing for your reference. I have inc?uded a quit claim deed for that portion of Lot 35 which is owned by the City. David Rischall has already requested the abandonment of the easement and paid the appropriate fee. After you have reviewed the enclosures I would request that you contact me. We would request that the abandonment of easement and the deed be done as soon as possible. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very r yours, r ichard A. Glassman RAG:jjv Enclosures cc: Tom Hart David Rischall T Farm Na. 32�M—QUlT CIAtM DEEO Minnesoia Unllozm ConveyaaWit HianYs Gotpurat�on or r to Jolnt Tenante No delinqnent iaxes and transfer entered; Certificate of Real Estate Value { ) filed { ) nat required Certificate af Real Estate Valus Na. ,19 Gounty Auditar by STATE L1EELt TAX DUE HEiiEON: $ MiUBFDtYIB C4.. Minnaspoib Date: � 2g — i (reserved for recording data} FOR VAi.tTABLE CONSiL1ERA'iION, , a �esota Tm.micipal . corgurlder the laws of � en sota , Gxantcir, hereby conveys and quitctaizns to ��d Riscitall and �1 or�,^��ekh-Rischall, husband and wife , Gxantees as joint tenants, xeal properEy in Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: All of Lat 35r Willow 5prings-AddiF.i.on, except the East ' forty (40) feet according to the recorded pla� thereof on fi3e and af record in the o££ice aE the County Recorder, Dakota County, M3:nnesota. � (if mora spact k n�rdod, cantlnw on b�ck) togeiher with aIl hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. Aifie Deed Tax Stamp Here STATE OF MINNESOTA CpUNTY OF Cit�of Mendota Heights By I{� Charlea E. Mertensotto; Mavor Attested t�o by�C ,I�thleen Staanson, C3tv Glerk � ss. The foregoing was acknowledged before me thia day oP � 19 , by and , the and 04 , a under the laws of , an behaif af the 2tOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL tOA OTHEIi TITL$ OR R ANK) SI423ATU8t QS P&ItSqN TAKIIJt3 ACKNO4'L$Dt3MENT W iMt (IIIClttd� G4ri70 K1d i�ddritJ Ol C�OiCt1 �� Li thti 1D[CSUIIt�IIt thQidd THIS INSTitUMENT WAS DiLAFT$D BY (NAM& ;i c�' c- Dc v 2 1 , i � i � ► � r � � � � ► ► � � � �� , � �� - oi � °'t . :{ 1` r y : �� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS i'ui�u �7 TO: Mayor, City Council and City August 3, 1990 Admini r FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-03: Centex Homes - Rezoning, CUP for PUD Preliminary Plat, Wetlands DISCUSSION Council met with Centex representatives at their May 15, 1990, meeting and closed the public hearing, referring the matter to the Planning Commission for their review of issues of Council concerns. Council reviewed the Planning Commission's input at their July 10, 1990, meeting. Councilmembers Cummins and Blesener continued to have some quality of construction concerns and the matter was tabled until the August 7, 1990 meeting to allow the developer time to address those concerns. Since the July 10th meeting, Councilmembers Cummins and Blesener have individually met with the developers and toured Centex sites in Bloomington and Mendota Heights. The discussions focused on upgrades of materials and construction. The developer will be prepared to discuss the charges made at the meeting. There have been revisions in additional garages, driveway locations and reconfigurations, shingle upgrades, siding materials changes and copper roofs over bay windows. Three areas that were discussed for possible changes that have not been revised were the loop road adjacent to I-494, the addition of more brick on the condominiums and the exterior stairs. Centex has prepared the attached map of the condominium area to show the changes. ACTION REOUIRED � � � �-} 24 n�� Please see attached July 6, 1990 memo. Z�� -�`�`�1 JED/KLB:kkb TO: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO �u.� y -3�re 6 , 19 9 0 Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Kevin Batchelder, Administrative SOBJECT: CASE NO. 90-03: Centex Homes Direct� Assistan� City Council closed the Centex Homes public hearing at their May 15, 1990 meeting and referred the Kensington Planned Unit Development back to the Planning Commission with a list of planning considerations to review. (See attached May 18, 1990 Planning Commission memo for list of planning issues). The Planning Commission reviewed this list with the developer item by item at their May meeting. A Planning Commission workshop was held on June 4th with the developer, staff and residents and again reviewed these items. (See June 21 Planning Commission memo). In response to the May Planning Commission meeting and the workshop, the developer submitted a revised proposal that was reviewed at the June Planning Commission meeting. DISCIISSION For tonight's meeting staff is providing a packet full of the materials, plans and correspondence that has been generated since the May 15, 1990 City Council meeting, as well as some additional background memos. These memos, minutes and revised plans document what has occurred during the Planning Commission review of the Centex Homes proposed Kensington Planned Unit Development. Actions the Council needs to consider tonight are: 1. Rezoning 2. Preliminary Plat Approval 3. Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development 4. Wetlands Permit � REZONING The underlying zoning of the proposed Kensington project is R- 1A, R-1B and R-1. (See attached zoning map). The Comprehensive Plan guides this area to be zoned as MR-PUD and HR-PUD. The developer's request is to rezone the property consistent with the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL The developer has submitted a preliminary plat that shows the dedication of a public street, a large park area and numerous condominiums, townhouses and manor home locations. Subject to final approval by the City, the developer proposes to compl�ete a final plat dedicating the public street and park to the City. The remaining areas will be platted as outlots with the final plats completed as the area's development progresses. WETLANDS The property in question includes a large pond, Owen's Pond and a smaller pond that are designated in the City's Wetland Ordinance. The following buildings are shown to be within the hundred foot (100') setback required in the Wetlands Ordinance. Townhouse #39 Townhouse #33 Townhouse #36 Lot 2, Blk 2 Lot 3, Blk 2 Lot 8, Blk 2 Lot 9, Blk 2 Lot 10, Blk 2 Lot 16, Blk 2 Lot 17, Blk 2 90' 70' 75' 95' 85' 75' 85' 80' 40' 80' * All single family Wetlands setbacks are for building pads and may not show future decks. (Please s�June 21, 1990 Planning Commission memo for discussion of Wetlands). CONDITIONAL IISE PERMIT FOR PLANNED IINIT DEVELOPMENT If Council desires to approve the CUP for PUD they need to establish the conditions under which it will be approved. At the May 15, 1990 City Council meeting, the City Council closed the public hearing and made the findings that the density in the Centex proposal and the proposed park dedication are appropriate. The City Council then referred the Centex proposal back to the Planning Commission for review of a list of identified planning considerations. The Planning Commission at their June meeting attempted to pass a motion to approve the project. This motion failed on a 3-3 (Duggan, Dreelan and Krebsbach opposed) vote. The Planning Commission also attempted to pass a motion to deny the project. This motion also failed on a 3-3 (Dwyer, Morson and Tilsen opposed) vote. The Planning Commission recommended on a 4-2 (Duggan and Morson opposed) vote to find that the plan was improved and that the public record gathered during the review of Council's list of identified issues should be forwarded to Council. Commissioner Duggan opposed on the basis of further review and Chairperson Morson opposed because he felt the need for an approval or denial recommendation. ACTION REQIIIRED Review the information forwarded by the Planning Commission and discuss any concerns or comments with the developer. The Council needs to consider a rezoning, preliminary plat, Wetland and a CUP for PUD. Any approval of this plan should be contingent upon the City and the developer coming to terms through a developers agreement. JED/KLB:kkb r � C lt O� y ,�..1.� 1Viendota Heights August 3, 1990 Mr. Dick Putnam Tandem Corporation 2765 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Dear Mr. Putnam: ��.Za�� ,�, Q{.1�,�,� s Your application for a� �� LJ � (rc(�w�, f�ia� will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, � sf �- The City Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, (�._ 3 Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb cc: Mr. Gerald Duffy Siegel, Brill, Greupner & Duffy, P.A. 100 Washington Square, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Mr. Tom Boyce Mr. Kevin Clarke Centex Real Estate Corporation 5929 Baker Road, Suite 470 Minnetonka, MN 55345 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 � , �„�G ��fr,/�, Mam�s Corporaiion Bnkor Tachnolopy Plum 5929 &lkor Rond 3u�to 47p M�nnalonlv�, Mlnno.^,o1� G63�b t�U�ust 7, ��39U Honox�tb.I� Mayor tz�zd Gxty Goutaci.l . City of Nlcndat� H�zgiits . � � . I,',e :(:han�es in t,l�s K.ensing�or, �'. U, D, Council. NIcmb�rs: . ' . � As a r�suit o� the ,7u.�y 10th, i99U, Council Nl��tzn�, C�nte1 h�,s n�et wa.�h ' sdm� Counei 1 m�m�kkr�r:� and made a numbcr oi' c:11�ngc�s to the P1an � Th� pux�p�se of this l�t��:r. is to hi.ghlight th� oht�n�es m�de sa.nce th� �bove� mentioncd me.etx�n�. 'I'h� changEs include the �0.��.pwl�ng: • , 1� ��.xmina.i:i.on of all gf�,ra�e dx�i�ve:way acc:ess�s to �tl�e �ub�.�,c si:reet �hat wcre vtajectio�iable. � ' . '� , Th� inc I i�s i on of' 39 addi k� � qna.l gara�n sp��s to be buxlt ' ' ��c�curr.Entiv with the $ui,.Ld�.n�s. , I� 3. Up�rade� of' the raat sh�,ng.E.e mat�r ia1 to a hcavy we��ka� �x�ade �� ('150-2bd# ) . ' . �. C�pper raot'� a�n la.eu o#' oomposi tion 5hingl�s on the i�y wxndows o�n ttan �ront, of:' the Buildrt�s. �. t;tra.nge� th� rxlumin�.un sxdi�.n� stylc� t'rom a"Dutch Lap" ta a , standAxd da��bl� 4" . . 6� Approx i�m�tel v 5U96 bxic;k Pn the fi ront r�nc� sid�s of t�.he Bu�.ld�n��.. 7� The iric:�,us,ian a#' $crc�ened porchPs r�s r�n a.^v�,i l,ablc op�.ion. � �i , A ac�mmi tmhr�t. #'r<>m Cet��ex to worlc with tkie Ci ty sta�f tcs ensure that ths workmanship is o�' t.he nua.Lit� that both t�e Cxty a�ac� Cc?nt�x d�fiir�±. C�ntex wi.l�l zmnJ.cm�nt a speci,�i� "Pre C�.osc-Tn Qtaala.�y Ins��ction" progs�m. • . . W� wi11 b� avai.l.al�1�: at the Atagust'� mc�tin� to furtk�er di.sauss �these ck�t3r�g�s or any oiher items. • 5xnc�reJ.y, . . c�rrr� F�OMES, �NC. . � , . � � �-'� � . . Tf�omas M, Hoyce ' � Pz��sS,d��t t Bakor Technology Plaza, 5929 Baker Road, Suite 4i0, Minnetonk�, MinneSata 1(612) 936•7833 f CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS August 3, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Admini�#:��V" SUBJECT: Schedule 1991 Budget Workshop DISCUSSION As the Council is aware, State Law requires us to adopt a preliminary 1991 Levy and 1991 preliminary budget prior to September 1, 1990. Given our meeting schedule, the last opportunity for the Council to do so will be at our meeting scheduled for August 21st. During the past few weeks we have attempted to establish a meeting date so that the Council can review in advance the proposed 1991 Budget which staff has prepared. For a number of reasons, the dates previously suggested have been unworkable, thus staff would like to propose an alternate date. It is proposed that the Council begin its meeting on the 21st at 6:00 P.M. in order to review with department heads any questions Council may have regarding the budget. Similar to last year, it would not be our intent to have each department give a formal presentation of its budget. Rather, individual department heads would be in attendance to respond to specific inquiries Council may have. With this format, it is anticipated that we could easily accomplish our budget review task within the allotted 1 to 1 1/2 hours. In order to allow Council sufficient time to digest the preliminary budget, it would be our intent to distribute the draft document to Council no later than Monday, August 13th. Our final 1991 Budget will be adopted sometime later this year, likely in December. The State imposed timeline, will assign us a public hearing date which does not conflict with Dakota County or the School District. There will be some latitude to adjust the anticipated revenues and expenditures at that time, in spite of the requirement that we adopt a preliminary budget at this point. Nonetheless, it is our hope that we can sufficiently address any major budget issues the Council may have at our meeting on August 21st. - RECOMMENDATION ,.'� Staff proposes a"box lunch" budget workshop t August 21st beginning at 6:00 P.M. This meeting date comply with the State requirement that we adopt a � be held on allows-us to preliminary budget by September 1st, while respecting our desire to limit the number of scheduled Council meetings during the summer months. ACTION REQUIRED Should Council concur, it should adopt a motion revising the starting time for the August 21st Council meeting to 6: 00 P.M. , and direct staff to distribute the draft budget document for Council review no later than August 13th. MTL:kkb Page No. 2860 July 10, 1990 Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No. 90-42, "RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FENCE," as amended to include a condition that Mr. & Mrs. Frisch execute a recordable agreement binding them and their successor grantees to remove the fence and/or plantings at their own expense if requested to do so by the City or other governmental agency for the upgrading or widening of Victoria or for snowplowing purposes, and in the event that the applicant fails to receive County approval for installation of the fence within the right-of- way, the fence may be placed along the property line subject to the conditions regarding submission of a survey, the agreement for fence and/or planting removal, and hedge maintenance. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 RESIGNATION Council acknowledged a letter from Bernard Friel informing Council of his resignation as the City's MASAC representative. Councilmember Cummins stated that he doubts that anyone in the community has given so much to better the community, both because of Mr. Friel's involvement in MASAC and in other ways. Councilmember Anderson Council's appreciatio accept his resignatio direct staff to begin replacement. Councilmember Blesener Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 moved to express n to Bernard Friel and to n with regret and to the process to recruit a seconded the motion. CASE NO. 90-21, Mr. Dan Houpt, from Kiesland, Inc., and BATESVILLE Architect Bruce Jones were present to request approval of the division of Lot 4, Block 1, Northland Plaza along with variances for driveway setback and sideyard setback abutting a street. Mr. Houpt stated that his company will be purchasing both Lots 3 and 4 and proposed to construct a new building on Lot 4 for the Batesville Casket Company. Page No. 2861 July 10, 1990 Mr. Jones reviewed the design implications and overall project. He stated that the site is challenging to develop, primarily because of accessibility - it is bounded by I-35E, I-494 and T.H. 55. The only point of access is from Northland Drive. The applicants wish to combine the driveways for the two lots, and that this driveway divide the two sites, serving each simultaneously. He stated'that they have considered their needs and the City's needs in locating the truck docks, and that they believe the best location is on the I-494 side because of the distance and natural grade change. He also stated that while there are no current plans for building expansion, the applicants felt that it is important to predict a future expansion and are therefore requesting a 20 foot sideyard setback variance to allow future expansion along T.H. 55. The proposed Batesville structure would be 30,000 square feet and a 10,000 future expansion is anticipated. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the applicants are requesting approval of a shared driveway, and that Council needs to have some idea of what the building pad and elevations will be for the future use of Lot 3. Mr. Houpt responded that he is very sensitive to what can be done with Lot 3 and decided that he did not want the loading docks exposed to Northland Drive. Mr. Jones stated that the applicants have decided to make sure that the lots are compatible and that the single drive is as much for the future development of Lot 3 as for Batesville. Mr. Jones showed Council photos of a building recently constructed in the metro area (an office/warehouse) which was used as a model. Councilmember Anderson asked whether the Batesville structure would have a 230 foot blank wall. Mr. Jones responded that it would, but that if it is taken in context and with the proper screening, he feels it will not have a negative impact. Mr. Houpt stated that there will be very few windows in the building, but lots of screening, and stressed that landscaping is very important to the company. There will be significant landscaping with coniferous and deciduous Page No. 2862 July 10, 1990 plantings. Responding to a comment from Councilmember Anderson about the proposed Linden Ash, he stated that this can be changed and that landscaping has been increased along I-494 and near the building. He stated that the applicants are sensitive to screening the impact of the blank wall. Councilmember Anderson asked how the ` applicants respond to the City Planner's seventh conclusion, that the building is clearly to large for the site. Mr. Houpt stated that he strongly disagrees, that the coverage ratio allowed by the City is 50�. Without the expansion there is 29� coverage, and with the addition there would be 38� coverage, which is far below what is allowed. The setback from T.H. 55 is very large, 169 feet from the edge of the road for Phase I. Councilmember Blesener stated that she does not feel the building fits the site. The applicant is not allowing enough green space to soften the mass of structure. She further stated that she has great concern over the truck dock impact on I-494. She questioned whether the berms and landscaping would provide adequate screening. She further stated that what goes on the site should display the quality of the industrial park and she did not like the idea of loading docks on this major roadway. She felt that the loading docks should be to the interior of the site and that the portions of the building facing the major roadways need to be more attractive. Mr. Jones responded that the applicants have spent many hours dealing with this issue. He stated that they are not asking for a lot split and they are trying to work with two lots that exist. Councilmember Blesener pointed out several problems, including orientation, building exterior, and location of the docks. Mayor Mertensotto stated that the loading docks will be seen from a distance on I-494. Mr. Houpt stated that the applicants felt that since the site could be entirely screened along I-494 that is the best area for the docks. Page No. 2863 July 10, 1990 Councilmember Blesener pointed out that the City has tried to develop an office park with high quality exterior materials and finished surfaces on all building sides. She asked whether there are some kinds of guidelines in the City's ordinances which define what is acceptable. Administrator Lawell responded that there is a section of the zoning ' ordinance which speaks to building materials, and he cited examples of those materials. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that all of the buildings in the industrial area are finished on all four sides. He stated that the applicants are asking for a variance for the building pad and that Council is concerned that the structure is too massive for the site. He asked why the building is not oriented with the truck dock towards Lot 3 since this is a warehouse structure without windows. Mr. Houpt responded that 100 to 110 feet is necessary for maneuvering the trucks and orienting the docks towards Lot 3 would make the lot useless for building purposes. Mayor Mertensotto stated that the applicants are only talking about 5 trucks per day and that they are asking for a sideyard setback variance now so in the future they can add a 44 foot building expansion. He asked why the applicants are not proposing to build the structure at that setback now and add the expansion to the other side in the future. Mr. Houpt responded stated that then the docks would be facing directly onto Lot 3 and would make it unappealing to the future occupant of a building on that lot. Councilmember Blesener stated that she has a problem with granting setback.variances for a building of the proposed size and that the lot needs every foot of green space that Council can give it. Mr. Houpt responded that the distance from T.H. 55 is a grassy area and far in excess of a typical setback, and that there will be considerably more green space than normal and more than the adjacent neighbors. He pointed out that the Unisys building is about 300 yards away from the site and has similar exterior materials but felt that his proposed structure is much more attractive. Page No. 2864 July 10, 1990 He pointed out that it will have a number of angles, canopies and some windows to make it more appealing. Mayor Mertensotto suggested that action on the matter be tabled to allow the applicants to look at alternatives. Mr. Houpt responded that the applicants'do have an alternative - asking Council to approve one condition, a common drive, and no setback variances. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that if the applicants just ask for a lot split and one driveway, they would be on their own as far as the building, with no guarantee that a building permit would be approved. He asked whether the applicants would like to have the opportunity to have the matter continued and come back with alternatives such as building to the future expansion line. Councilmember Blesener pointed out that this would require a variance and that she is opposed to any variance on that side of the lot. Councilmember Cummins stated that Council is concerned about how the building would appear from I-494 and T.H. 55. He informed the applicants that anything that does not address those concerns will not be approved. Mr. Jones suggested that the building could be moved up 40 feet and a variance would not be required. Councilmember Blesener responded that this would not resolve Council's concerns. She stated that she has a problem with the size of the building and the huge . parking lot on the side of the building where it is proposed and that she is not convinced that the landscaping will be effective. Mr. Houpt asked how Council would react to a plan that would include a shared drive but no variances. Councilmember Cummins stated that the concept of one driveway makes some sense but that Council would not want to approve one drive until it sees what the applicants plan to do with it. Mr. Jones showed the Council an alternate which did not require setback variances and a Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 RECESS building that was T.H. 55 but which driveway. Page No. 2865 July 10, 1990 not so long or visible from did propose a common Councilmember Blesener asked whether Mr. Houpt would still ask to expand the building in the future under the alternate plan. He responded that he would not. The loading docks would still face 494, the site would be shift`ed and parking along the east side would be reduced. In terms of design, he stated that he has looked at every conceivable way of laying out the site and this is the most desirable location for the truck docks without combing the lots into one. Mayor Mertensotto informed the applicants that Council is saying that the warehouse building proposed is too large for the site. Councilmember Blesener added that Council is willing to table the matter to allow the applicants to bring back an alternate plan, but that she would otherwise move to deny the requests. She also stated that if the applicant decides to submit an alternate plan, she would like the City Planner to prepare a report. After discussion, Councilmember to table the Batesville Casket application to July 17th. Councilmember Blesener seconded Cummins moved Company the motion. Mayor Mertensotto called a recess at 9:37 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 9:48 P.M. CASE NO. 90-03, Mayor Mertensotto reviewed a staff inemo CENTEX regarding the Centex Homes applications for rezoning, preliminary plat approval, conditional use permit for Planned Unit Development and wetlands permit. He informed the audience that Council would consider the Planning Commission information and review the proposed plans with the developer, and further informed the audience on the action requested by the applicants. Mr. John Bannigan, legal counsel for Centex, introduced Dick Putnam, from the Tandem Corporation, and Tom Boyce, from Centex. Mr. Putnam showed the Council and audience drawings which had been developed as the Page No. 2866 July 10, 1990 result of the Council hearing and subsequent Planning Commission discussion. He stated that changes from the last plan were made in three areas, all in response to the questions asked at the Council hearing. One of the issues addressed in the plan is buffering along Mendota Heights Road between the Centex site and the Hampshire area and buffering along the park and along I-494. He sta'ted that the applicants asked their landscape architect to do more detail along Mendota Heights Road, improving the landscaping looking from Hampshire towards the townhouse building. He further stated that most of the people present at the Planning Commission meeting felt that the new plan provided a good transition between the uses - an earth berm and heavy landscaping treatment. He stated that Along I-494, there is a distance of over 200 feet between the 16 unit building and the freeway and the sketch does not reflect the distance well. The site is about 20 feet above the freeway at the earth berm, and all that can be seen from the freeway is the top of the building - the front of the building is about 300 feet from the freeway. With respect to wetlands and tree protection, he showed a site plan responding to the natural character of the land. He stated that there are 5 or 6 very nice trees retained in the plan where a building had been placed in the earlier plan. He also stated than an area which had been thought to be a wetlands is not wet and that the plan was changed to work around the trees and to create ponds on what was formerly though to be a wetland area. The recreation building was relocated. He stated that originally the condominiums were proposed adjacent to Mendota Heights Road and that the plan has been reconfigured to place townhouses in that area, reducing the number of condominium units to 276. Buildings have also been shifted to save two oak trees in the condominium area. The townhouses were moved to get a greater distance from Mendota Heights Road, some of the structures were changed from four unit to two or three unit buildings. He also stated that the plan shows the setbacks from wetlands areas where the setbacks are less than 100 feet. Page No. 2867 July 10, 1990 Mr. Putnam showed the proposed access to the south. He stated that Dr. Biehl and his neighbors prefer an easement with private streets rather than a public street, so the lots have been widened and have been shifted to give more space for the driveway easement. Mr. Putnam informed Council that a great deal of time was spent at the Planning Commission meeting going through setbacks on a case by case basis, and he believes that changes made have benefitted the plan. The last item of change was an increase in the amount of parking in the condo area so owners have in excess of 2.5 spaces per unit - one enclosed space and 1.5 outside space per unit. Responding to a question from Mayor Mertensotto, he stated that the developers addressed the issues raised by the Council at three meetings, including two Planning Commission meetings, including showing siding and brick samples. He felt that the Commission minutes and staff reports go through the issues well. With respect to roads, the private roads are proposed to be 28 feet wide with surmountable curb and gutter and built to city standards. There are about 27 acres within the park boundaries. He informed Council that there are proposed to be a total of 419 units in Kensington Phase 2, including 48 single family units. Phase 1 will be 132 units. Mayor Mertensotto asked whether the developer has any plans to develop the park area. Mr. Putnam responded that they do not. Mayor Mertensotto then pointed out that the fields, etc., are to be built at city expense. Mr. Putnam responded that the developers have designed the park space to accommodate the city's desires and have been working with the Park Commission. The developers did not designed the park, but rather designed the park area to accommodate city plans. Councilmember Blesener pointed out that the park referendum included $560,000 to build the fields, comfort stations, etc., in the area. Councilmember Blesener raised a question over parking. She stated that she started to look at parking and garages and all off street used Page No. 2868 July 10, 1990 to make up 2.5 per unit. She expressed concern about the amount of paved area and blacktop in the development and stated that she is not comfortable with so much blacktop in some parts of the site. She asked whether guest parking could be clustered in a couple of sites instead and whether there is any way of widening some of the private roads and allowing parking on one side of the road to eliminate some of the pull-off parking. Administrator Lawell responded that it has been felt that if parking can be accommodated in the design there is nothing inherently bad about it. At one time it was thought that Lockwood Drive could be widened to accommodate parking on one side but that the Public Safety staff would prefer to minimize that possibility. Councilmember Blesener stated that she is only talking about parking on the private streets. She further stated that she would be willing to identify areas for future parking rather than requiring that parking be built now. Councilmember Anderson stated that there was a perceived parking inadequacy at the last Council discussion and that blacktop follows parking necessity. He felt that centralized parking looks messy and takes away from the rustic view. He did not think Council would want to promote on-street parking. Councilmember Blesener responded that she is only thinking of on street parking for the extra half stall per unit and that it seems that the extra half stall would be for guest parking and seldom used. Mr. Putnam stated that Centex's Devonwood Phase 1 in Bloomington required only 2 spaces. In that phase the development was at less than 2.2 spaces. In the second phase parking was increased to 2.4 spaces. He further stated that someone on the Planning Commission commented that it would be nice if there were more off street parking because sometimes it could get crowded. Devonwood, in its recreation area, has no separate parking. In the proposed Kensington plan, there is a 10 car parking area provided for the recreation building, which is not counted in the parking requirement. With respect to on-street Page No. 2869 July 10, 1990 parking, Mr. Putnam stated that it uses more space per car and makes it very difficult to try to travel on the street many times. He felt that idea of keeping the guest spots separate and defining them by signage is a good idea. Councilmember Cummins stated that one of the issues Council addressed was design of the garages. Ae asked Mr. Putnam to show a larger drawing of what the garages will look like. Councilmember Blesener stated that another of her concerns with the site plan is that the two-car garages have been sprinkled around. She would like to see more of them clustered wherever possible. She also suggested eliminating all of the drives that come out onto the public street. She did not think there should be driveways backing onto the public street from the condo area. Mr. Putnam responded that people have liked the small scale as opposed to the 6 to 8 car garages. Two car garages fit nicely and they were planned on purpose, although it would be much easier to build all of them the same. With respect to the driveways, he stated that this has been changed. All of the condos have been set back so that they are the same as single family setbacks. All of the manor homes come out to the public street: there are 15 private�street intersections and three garages in a distance of 2300 feet. Councilmember Cummins stated that one issue he raised at the last discussion was quality of construction and that this has not been discussed tonight except one paragraph in the staff report indicating that the buildings would be similar to the existing manor homes. He asked whether the same quality of materials and workmanship are anticipated. Mr. Putnam responded that they are. Centex spent much time with their designers and architects and are not yet finished. The exterior will be aluminum siding. Mr. Clark from Centex has done research on the matter and found that there is a remodeling type of siding and a thinner gauge for new construction. The new construction type gives a great deal of selection but there is not much variety in the remodeling type. He Page No. 2870 July 10, 1990 stated that Centex plans to use the new construction type, and that aluminum siding is permanent (60 years) as opposed to wood. The shingle grade was another issue raised. Centex plans using 240 weight material like in Hampshire. Brick quality will be the same as Hampshire, and windows will be the same as in the manor homes, which is required by the air noise regulations. ' Mayor Mertensotto stated that the materials must be stipulated in the developers agreement so that the Council has control in the event that the project is developed by someone other than Centex. Mr. Putnam responded that the City's agreements are such that the developer does not have the ability to make changes unless they are approved by the Council. Councilmember asked whether specifications have been written that would be included in the developers agreement. Mr. Boyce responded that he would have no problem committing to aluminum siding, etc., and type of quality but would not like to be committed to a color in case it is discontinued by the supplier. Councilmember Cummins stated that what he has spent much time going through the manor homes that have been built in Kensington and has been through many of the'homes in Copperfield, Bridgeview and Hampshire. He further stated that recognizing that the discussion is over multi-family housing, he is not satisfied that the manor homes already constructed live up to his expectations. He stated that neither the quality of materials or workmanship meet the standards set in Mendota Heights, and that there will have to be a considerable upgrade in the standards and material before he will support the proposal. He felt that standards must be specified in the developers agreement, but he does not believe the standards in Kensington Phase 1 are up to established standards in Mendota Heights and stated that he does not believe the quality of the project is up to what exists in the southeast area. He informed the developers that he could not support the project until there is substantial upgrading in materials and workmanship and expressed surprise that the developers have not come back to Council with more specifics and review of the materials. Page No. 2871 July 10, 1990 With respect to the issue of potential future rentals, it was noted that Council can request the developer to establish in the condominium covenants that there can be no rentals. Mayor Mertensotto stated that he is not in favor of surmountable curbs. Ms. Cathy Connolly, representing area ' residents, stated that the residents' position remains that this is not a proper project for the site. The residents are troubled by the fact that despite numerous inquiries there have been no answers to the type and quantity of variances the project will require. The answer she has been given was that because this is a PUD the developers are not required to go through the variance process. The stated that the PUD section of the City ordinances states criteria which must be met before variances can be given. She stated that the onus has been put on the residents to show that the variances will constitute a threat to safety, health and welfare. She stated that the residents have been put in the position of being on the defensive and are being asked to show what is wrong with the plan, where in fact it is not the residents place to do so. City Attorney Hart responded that Ms. Connolly is correct that the standards of Section 19.26 of the Zoning Ordinance are standards Council should adhere to in approving any PUD that involves the granting of variances. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that setbacks in the plan do not meet ordinance requirements because of the clustering. Ms. Connolly stated that the extent that the developer is able to meet each of the criteria the residents have no objection to variances being granted but that they have not seen any findings. Mayor Mertensotto stated that in his judgment the whole procedure in the southeast area is contrary to the development the City has been following since 1965. Ms. Connolly stated that variances require a practical and reasonable should not be solely for financial consideration. She further stated should basis and that the Page No. 2872 July 10, 1990 developer's agreement does not wed the City to the plan - the agreement was prepared before the public hearing commenced, and any agreement prior to a public hearing makes a sham of the public hearing process. She felt that the Council is not legally bound to approve the plan on the basis of agreements which took place prior to the hearing process. Councilmember Anderson stated that before he came on the Council in January he spent three years on the Planning Commission and almost that entire time the Commission reviewed plans for the development. It was his understanding at the beginning of that time that the City had a comprehensive plan adopted in 1985. He asked why the Council has had the developers come back all of this time if all Council needs to do is say that the proposal doesn't correspond to the Comprehensive Plan and what the developers have done during all this time is for naught and that the City should turn the land into parkland. He stated that all along the comprehensive plan has been in place. He pointed out that the residents are against the developers they have purchased their homes form, and that the proposal has been clear for years, before many of the residents built their homes. He felt that a disservice is being done the rest of the residents of Mendota Heights. He did not think Council can say the comprehensive plan means nothing and that if there is a comprehensive plan, the proposed development certainly conforms with it. Ms. Connolly responded that many of the people in the area have come recently to the area and have had no opportunity - many of them have made what they felt was reasonable inquiry of the developers on what was planned. They were entitled to rely on that information. She further stated that she thinks the Council would be hard pressed to find a person who has a good history of the detail of the project, and that if any resident were to check at any point along the line they could not have concluded when they purchased their homes that what they were seeing then would be what they are seeing proposed today. Councilmember Anderson responded that it is unfair for Council to imply that everything is open. Council is adhering to precedent - the Page No. 2873 July 10, 1990 plan has been in place for some time and the plan conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Connolly stated that the residents have identified several instances where they feel the proposal does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan and also that it is not the neighbors who are re-opening anything. She stated that the Council has before it the substance of the project and that it is not a "done deal." The residents are talking about the zoning, etc., and looking for consistency with the whole of Mendota Heights. She further stated that it is clear to the residents that there will be multi-family on the site; they are simply looking for prudent development and have not seen any consideration of the impact of the density on the southeast area of the community. Councilmember Anderson responded that the least expensive of the condominiums will cost $70,000 to $80,000. He further commented that the homes in Copperfield and Hampshire have increased in value from $200,000 to $300,000, and to take the approach that everything in Mendota Heights should have that type of value is not valid. Ms. Connolly responded that she would like to make it clear that the neighborhood would like to see a development which will benefit the commun ity . Councilmember Cummins stated that he spoke to 20 to 25 of the residents of Copperfield and Hampshire within 24 hours after they received the hearing notice. He was concerned that the residents had received erroneous information from a variety of sources and that they diligently attempted to find out what was proposed. Councilmember Anderson stated that he does not think that City staff would give out erroneous information and that if the residents got . wrong '-�n rmation he did not think that means �� the C ur�C 1 should change the Comprehensive � Plan. �i position was that if Council wished ` to cha,ge its position on the Comprehensive Plan ba d on a significant change in circumstances, he would agree to consider it. If Council is not willing to take that position, he felt that it should own up to the q� _ ;, j� > �fVv,`• No. 2874 � u y 10, 1990 rn�S'�' fact that Counci xus� comply with precedent and the Comprehen ive lan and further felt that the proposed n generally complies. Mayor Mertensotto stated that Council has heard the public comments and has a massive public record. The issues that are under consideration are rezoning from R-1A, R-1B and R-1 to MR and HR-PUD, and unless the zoning change takes place, everything else is dead. City Attorney Tom his understanding correspond to the districts. Hart commented that it is that the zoning districts Comprehensive Plan Mr. Bannigan stated that there are some unanswered questions before a decision can be made. With respect to quality, he stated that he has listened to Councilmember Cummins comments and would like to point out that quality is in the eye of the beholder. He stated that there is some leeway to try to satisfy Councilmember Cummins concerns. He stated that there are problems with respect to the leasing issue and that when negotiating a developers agreement the developers cannot, in such cases of transfer or estates, tie the hands of the homeowner and does not want to mislead the Council by saying that no owner can lease or rent his unit. Responding to the variance question, he stated that the variances can be addressed now or whenever Council wishes, and the matter of variances has not come up in the discussions. He stated that the developers do not want to create the impression that they are trying to avoid the issue. Mr. Putnam stated that there is a set of standards that are in the Planning Commission review and that they deal with particular circumstances which he would detail if the Council would like. Mayor Mertensotto stated that he does not think Council could go through the whole plan approval this evening, that the final conditional use permit for PUD would have to be contingent upon the developers entering into a developers agreement to address the issues. He pointed out that if the developers can't get a 4/5th vote from the Council the matter is dead. Page No. 2875 July 10, 1990 Councilmember Cummins stated that he does support the Comprehensive Plan and has not changed his position and that the developer is correct that in terms of legal standards quality is the most subjective standard in the City's ordinance. He further stated that he thinks the Council has some advantage to the extent that it already has an example ' (Kensington Phase I) of what the developer intends to build. It was his observation that in all respects while Phase I manor home construction meets minimal standards, the manor homes are indeed minimal. They are not the standards the Council has come to expect in the Southeast area. He stated that the shingles are poorly installed and there is poorly installed aluminum siding. The vinyl flooring had nicks and was laid over grates. Sod was laid on clay without black dirt, and paint has been applied sparsely. There were poorly installed fireplaces. He pointed to these instances as examples of what he considers unsatisfactory quality and construction and that these are not the types of homes, single family or multi-family, which Council would like in Mendota Heights. He pointed out that there are very nice homes in Copperfield and Hampshire and that he is confident they will still be nice in 20 or 30 years. He did not have that same confidence in the manor homes, and that if Council is to address the issue, the quality must be high quality for him to support the proposal. Mr. Bannigan asked whether the concern is addressed in the developers agreement or if the developer should respond now. Councilmember Cummins responded that there a number of long standing and qualified builders in the City and suggested that the City hire one of them to work with the developers to develop standards that would suitable. Mr. Bannigan stated that he would prefer to satisfy the concerns and would like an opportunity to meet the concerns to the satisfaction of Councilmember Cummins. are be Councilmember Cummins asked whether the Council feels it is feasible to retain someone to advise it on appropriate construction Page No. 2876 July 10, 1990 standards in quality of materials and workmanship and whether there is money available to retain someone. Councilmember Blesener stated that she would suggest asking the developers to prepare a set of design standards for consideration and have staff come up with a process for reviewing the standards - find someone with expertise who could be hired as a consultant to review the material. She suggested that staff could come back with the process at the next meeting. The Council received comments from members of the audience. After discussion, Councilmember Blesener moved to defer action on the planning applications Ayes: 5 and continue the matter to August 7th. Nays: 0 Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. RETIREMENT PARTY Councilmember Hartmann moved that the City hold a recognition reception for retired City Planner Howard Dahlgren and former Councilmember Liz Witt at the Marriott Ayes: 5 Courtyard on August 1st at 7:30 P.M. Nays: 0 Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmember Hartmann moved that Ayes: 5 the meeting be adjourned. Nays: 0 Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 12:12 o'clock A.M. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor , ' � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 24, 1990 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, July 24, 1990, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve. Chairperson Morson called the meeting to order at 7:32 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Morson, Koll, Dreelan, Krebsbach, Duggan and Tilsen. Commission Dwyer was excused. Also present were Public Works Director Jim Danielson, Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder, Planning Consultant Tim Malloy and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner 1990 minutes Commissioner AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Duggan moved to with corrections. Dreelan seconded approve the June 26, the motion. CASE NO. 90-28: HEAVER DEVELOPMENT - WETLANDS PERMIT Mr. Keith Heaver, Heaver Development, was present to discuss his request for Wetlands Permit for seven lots on Brookside Lane, Lots 1,2,3,5 and 6, � Block 1 and Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Ivy Falls Creek Addition. Mr. Heaver explained that at the time of subdivision and platting, the Wetlands Permits for these lots were overlooked. Chairperson Morson pointed out that the entire Ivy Falls Creek Addition is identified as being within the Wetlands District. Chairperson Morson stated that any approval of the Wetlands would have to limit fill in the storm water holding pond at rear of the lot. Public Works Director Danielson concurred with Chairperson Morson. Mr. Heaver stated that he would submit a final grading plans to the City at the time the building permits are applied for. Commissioner Koll questioned if the trees on Lot 5 will survive the grading. Mr. Heaver stated that both he and the homeowner are concerned about the t � trees and that they would like to save as many as possible. Mr. Heaver stated that he had just attended a seminar on tree preservation and that they will make every effort possible to save as many trees as possible. Planner Malloy pointed out that the survival of the trees will depend upon the specific type of tree species. Mr. Heaver stated that most of the trees are Cottonwood trees. Commissioner Duggan questioned the pool of water that is on Lot 6 and wondered if that existed before the recent rains. Mr. Heaver explained that Twin City Testing is in the process of testing the soil conditions. Commissioner Duggan stated he is concerned about the amount of dirt being taken out of the lot. He questioned if there could be a possibility of damaging the ponding area and wondered how that area could be protected. Mr. Heaver stated that testing of the soil has been done and that that is the water table that Commissioner Duggan is questioning. Public Works Director Danielson stated that a soil engineer should review the area. Commissioner Duggan stated that on Lot 3 it seemed that trees had already been chopped down. He stated that he urges Mr. Heaver to keep as many trees as possible. Commissioner Duggan further commented on the mound of dirt on Lot 4 and he wondered how long the dirt would remain on the lot. Mr. Heaver responded that that is a temporary stock pile of dirt and that a part of the fill would be used between the house and the street. He stated that the mound of dirt will be removed by the end of the week. Commissioner Tilsen moved to waive the public hearing and to recommend to the City Council that they approve the Wetlands Permit for Lots 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6, Block 1, Ivy Falls Creek Addition and�Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Ivy Falls Creek Addition conditioned upon that no fill be placed above high water level as directed by the City Engineering Department and that care be taken that no degradation occur to the water table as enforced by City personnel. Commissioner Duggan offered a friendly amendment stating that care be taken to protect the trees as referred to in paragraph three of the Planner's report (see attached Exhibit A). Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. 3 AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 CASE NO. 90-27: HEALTHEAST - SIGN VARIANCE Mr. Thomas Rhude, Thomas Sign Company, was present to discuss a request by HealthEast to install a new sign to identify their new Immediate Care Facility. Commissioner Koll questioned why the sign will be located on the east side of the road. Mr. Rhude stated that the location of the entrance dictated where the sign could be placed and that aesthetically it is better to have the sign on the east side. Commissioner Koll questioned if there will be any additional signs added in the future. Mr. Rhude responded that he is unaware of additional signage in the future. Mr. Rhude further explained that the sign will be internally illuminated. Commissioner Duggan questioned if the lighting will be controlled by timers and Mr. Rhude answered that the lights will be controlled the same as the external building lights. Commissioner Duggan questioned the amount of traffic that will pass through the area. Mr. Rhude explained that at certain times the hours will be extended pass the normal working hours. Mr. Rhude further stated that they will be taking down the existing temporary signs. Commissioner Dreelan questioned if there will be landscaping around the sign. Mr. Rhude stated that there will probably be no landscaping around the sign. He stated that the sign sits fairly low to the ground. Planner Malloy briefly reviewed his concerns regarding the landscaping and the setback of the sign. He further stated that he is concerned with the possibility of an over abundance of signs in the future. Commissioner Koll moved to recommend to the City Council that they approve an eight foot (8') front yard setback variance on the east side of the road as submitted. Commissioner Tilsen offered a friendly amendment stating that the variance be conditioned upon removal of the non-conforming temporary signs and that some landscaping be considered. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 CASE NO. 90-29: MIDWAY SIGN CO. - SIGN VARIANCE Ms. Laura Stersa, Branch Manager of the Dakota County State Bank, was present to discuss their request for a sign variance. Ms. Stersa explained that the bank is having trouble with drive up teller traffic using the wrong entrance and then trying to get to the tellers by driving the wrong way at the access point. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 CASE NO. 90-23: HOBBS - VARIANCE Public Works Director Danielson briefly explained that the present Zoning Ordinance does not allow ground signs in the B-1 Zoning District but that the City is in the process of updating the Ordinance and staff will include requirements for signage in the B-1 Zoning District. Commissioner Krebsbach stated her concerns for safety with respect to the Instant Teller Cash Machine. She stated that the sign might be drawing more attention to the Instant Cash Machine than necessary. Ms. Stersa stated that this sign would be an additional sign noting the cash machine. She explained that there is already a sign at the front entrance off of Dodd Road and South Plaza Drive. Commissioner Tilsen suggested that only one message should be included on the sign. He stated that there might a cause for confusion with the arrows and language on the sign. Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that the City Council grant a thirty foot (30') front yard sign setback variance. Commissioner Koll seconded the motion. Mr. Jerold Hobbs, 1065 Wagon Wheel Trail, was present to discuss his request for a variance in order to enclose his existing entryway with a 7' by 14' roofed porch. Mr. Hobbs stated that he plans on heating the porch for flowers. ' Commissioner Duggan stated that he had visited with the family regarding the addition and that the AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 CASE NO. MATEYKA - WETLANDS 90-30: PERMIT Hobbs are considering a new exterior siding for the whole house and that the addition would be built to match the new exterior. Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that the City Council grant a five foot (5') side yard abutting a street variance. Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion. Mr. Paul Mateyka, Sr., owner of Lot 4, Block 1, Spring Creek Acres, was present to discuss his request for a Wetlands Permit. Mr. Mateyka explained that he is proposing to build a one story home on his property and that he has already submitted building plans to the City Building Department for their review. Commissioner Duggan questioned what are the stakes already in the ground.� Mr. Mateyka explained that the blue stakes represent where the house will be placed and that a professional surveyor placed them. Commissioner Tilsen stated that preserving the character of the Wetland is more important than maintaining the existing front yard setbacks. He stated that the house is too close to the ravine and that he would like to see the house moved further to the north. Mr. Mateyka explained that if the house was moved further north, he would lose valuable lot space. He stated that there have been established setbacks with the existing homes. He stated that by taking off thirty feet (30') off of the street, he would lose $50,000 off the valuation of his home. He stated that he doesn't feel he should go through the aggravation in getting a permit due to what the City has done with installing a storm sewer system. Mr. Mateyka submitted pictures to the Planning Commission showing his lot and the various trees that stand on the lot. He further noted the variable setbacks of the existing homes. Chairperson Morson acknowledged the variable setbacks and questioned if Mr. Mateyka would be willing to move his setbacks. Mr. Mateyka responded that he could move the setback up ten feet (10') and set the house fifty-five feet (55') from the ravine. He further stated that there are over two hundred (200) trees on his lot. Mr. Mateyka explained that he would lose seven or eight trees if he were to build the home as proposed. Commissioner Tilsen stated that, according to the contour map submitted, that the fill brought in would wipe out the front yard. .He stated that it is impossible to ascertain what is on the contour plan. Chairperson Morson stated that the site• plan submitted was carelessly done and that the Commission would like to see more accurate topographic plans. He further stated that he would like to see trees identified on the plans. Chairperson Morson stated that the contours, as shown on the plan, are contradictory. There was a brief discussion by the Planninq Commission regarding whether they should recommend approval of the Wetlands Permit subject to the grading plans being worked out by Mr. Mateyka's surveyor or �to table the request for further consideration by the Planning Coinmission. Mr. Mateyka stated that he would like to see a recommended approval as he would like to start construction as soon as possible before winter. Commissioner Krebsbach moved to table the request for a Wetlands Permit to the August 28, 1990 Planning Commission meeting due to the inadequate information submitted by the applicant. She further stated that the Planning Commission is trying to exercise extreme care in preserving the Wetlands in the City and that the applicant should resubmit an appropriate survey showing tree identification and a comparison of the exis�ing grade and the proper grade. Commissioner Duggan offered a friendly amendment stating that the decision of the Planning Commission will be relative to the existing setback variances of the homes within the development. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. Commissioner Dreelan and Commissioner Koll questioned whether the request should be tabled or not. AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 ABSTAIN: Dreelan, Koll HEARING - CASE NO. 90-25: HEAVER DEVELOPMENT - CUP Mr. Keith Heaver, Developer of Mendakota Estates, was present to discuss his request for a conditional use permit. Mr. Heaver explained that the lack of sales is due to the appearance of the area. Mr. Heaver stated that he is proposing (to make the lots more interesting and marketable) to add some landscaping which would include mounds along the rear lot lines. Mr. Heaver stated that there is material, for the mounds, already deposited on the lot and that he was unaware that a conditional use permit was necessary. Mr. Heaver explained that he has retained a landscape architect to prepare the design. Commissioner Duggan complimented Mr. Heaver on the design and concept. Commissioner Duggan stated that he does not like the rubble that has been deposited. Commissioner Tilsen stated there is bituminous buried in the mound and that State Law prohibits the burying of bituminous. Commissioner Tilsen questioned if any of the fill is unusable for the berms. Mr. Heaver stated that there is about 800 to 1000 cubic yards of fill and that some of the fill is worth keeping. Chairperson Morson stated that he feels that some of the fill is worth saving and that the contractor should not be required to remove all of the fill. Chairperson Morson questioned if their are any easements on the land. Mr. Heaver stated that there is a five foot (5') easement on each lot. He explained that cable television is available on the rear of the lots and that gas, electric and telephone utilities are located on the front of the lots. Chairperson Morson questioned if the berming on the rear of the lots would conflict with the cable utility easements. Public Works Director Danielson stated that he was unaware of the cable television line located on the rear of the lots. Commissioner Krebsbach questioned who the owner of the land is. Mr. Heaver explained that Bream Homes was the original developer and that Perkegwin Investments are the owners. Mr. Heaver stated that he is representing the Perkegwin Investment AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Company. Chairperson Morson opened the meeting to the public for comment. Mrs. Hooper, owner of Lot 8, Mendakota Estates, stated that their lot is south of Mendakota Country Club. She stated that they have been unable to sell their land due to the lights and air conditioning from the Country Club. She stated that they would like to see some berming done on their property between themselves and Mendakota Country Club to help sell their land. Mrs. Janet Leichter, 909 Mendakota Court, stated that there is drain pipe, tile and asphalt in the fill deposited on the land. She stated that she is worried about possible drainage problems and weeds that could occur should the f il l not be removed . She stated that there might be some good dirt there. She further stated that berming the lots is not objectionable. Commissioner Duggan moved to close the public hearing. Mrs. Leichter further stated that the land seems to drain well but there are pockets within the fill where the water stands which collects mosquitos and algae. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that the City Council authorize the appropriate people to remove all of the fill that has been placed on the lots as it is offensive and unfair to the neighbors. He further moved to recommend to the City Council that they grant a conditional use permit based on suitable matter (fill) being brought onto the site and that the City Engineering staff protect the contouring of the land. Commissioner Tilsen offered a friendly amendment stating that the bituminous and metal materials be disposed of at the proper recycling places and that the existing fill material not be dumped on any other site in Mendota Heights. Commissioner Tilsen seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 1, MORSON HEARING - CASE NO. 90-24: J.A. DEVELOPMENT - CUP FOR PUD AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 HEARING CASE NO. 90-26: CON/SPEC - CUP (Removal requirements too strict). As requested by J.A. Development, Commissioner Duggan moved to continue the public hearing to August 28, 1990 at 8:00 o'clock P.M. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. A brief recess was called at 9:45 o'clock P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 9:50 o'clock P.M. Mr. Jerry Haarman, MIST Corporation, was present to discuss a request for a conditional use permit for participative athletics to construct an indoor soccer arena. Mr. Haarman explained that the site is a difficult site to build on. He explained that the previous plan to construct an indoor arena got a 1_ittle out of hand and that they were unable to get the financing for the project. Mr. Haarman stated that they will be seeking Tax Increment Financing from the City. Mr. Haarman stated that has a new architect working on the project and that he feels that he now has a better building designed. Mr. Jim Kellison, Vice President of Con/Spec, stated that the new building will be constructed as a warehouse/industrial use building and that their first tenants will be for indoor soccer use. He explained that they have sunk the building about twelve feet (12'). He explained that the proposed material will be Fab Con with clear span trusses. Commissioner Tilsen questioned why there is no sewer hooked to the manholes. Mr. Kellison explained that they would be running sewer laterals for future industrial use and that.they will be preparing plans. Commissioner Tilsen questioned if the storm sewer could remain under the building and he questioned if water loops are required through the building. Public Works Director Danielson stated that he would prefer to not have the storm sewer running under the building specifically due to maintenance reasons. He further stated that he has not seen water looping done through a building in Mendota Heights because of inetering problems. Commissioner Duggan questioned if Con/Spec has proof of parking. Mr. Kellison responded that they have proposed 127 stalls and that 98 stalls are required as per the Zoning Ordinance for the industrial/office district. Mr. Kellison submitted parking calculations to the Planning Commission. Mr. Kellison explained that they could provide an additional 72 stalls. Mr. Kellison explained that the mechanical equipment would be screened by pre-finished metal similar to the front entrance and that the equipment would not be visible from Northland Drive. He explained that the screens would be seen from Mendota Heights Road. Mr. Kellison explained that their budget had been stretched before the landscaping was considered. He explained that he likes to see an open area. Mr. Kellison explained that the color of the building would be a plain concrete color and that they are willing to make changes in the color if assisted by the City with the funds at the desire of the Commission. He explained that the vinyl used will be similar to what was used at the West St. Paul Rainbow Store. Commissioner Krebsbach questioned if there are emergency exits and drives for emergency vehicles. Commissioner Duggan stated that a concern with the previous plan was a turnaround for buses. Mr. Kellison, referring to a map, briefly explained where the emergency exits and turnarounds are proposed. In response to a question from Commissioner Krebsbach, Mr. Kellison explained the outdoor lighting. He stated that the lighting will go around the back of the building with wall packs. He stated that there will be lighting for the parking area. He further stated that they have considered spot lighting. Commissioner Duggan questioned if Con/Spec has considered installing a walking track within the building. Mr. Haarman and Mr. Kellison stated that that has been considered and that they will look into it further. Chairperson Morson then opened the meeting for � public comment. There was no one present to discuss this issue. Commissioner Duggan moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Krebsbach suggested that Con/Spec should bring samples of the materials proposed for Council's review. Commissioner Krebsbach moved to recommend that the City Council grant a conditional use permit for participative athletics and to grant a ten foot (10') variance to the rear yard setback, twenty-two foot (22') front yard sign setback variance and a seven foot (7') amendment to the City's policy allowing only twenty-five foot (25') wide driveway conditioned upon: 1. more decorative concrete pigment be used 2. more decorative lighting be used. Commissioner Duggan offered a friendly amendment stating that the approval should also be conditioned upon: 3. providing guardrails and 1' contours 4. proof of additional parking Commissioner Dreelan offered a friendly amendment stating that the approval should also be conditioned upon: 5. landscaping should be installed in the frorit of the building to soften the walls and that more upright trees be used. 6. that the approval is subject to final City Engineer's approval. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 VERBAL REVIEW i_`��ili�;i�151�i�4Y AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Public Works Director Jim Danielson gave a verbal review to the Planning Commission on City Council action on Planning items. Commissioner Duggan moved to adjourn the meeting at 11:12 o'clock P.M. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. . Respectfully submitted, Kimberlee K. Blaeser Senior Secretary MENDOTA HEIGHTS FlRE DEPARTMENT _ JUNE 1990 MONTHLY REPORT FIRECALLSNO. 90098 - 90126 FIRE ALARMS DISPATCHED: NUMBER ACTUAL FlRES Structure - MH Commercial 1 Structure - MH Residential Structure - Contract Areas Vehicle - MH 1 Vehicle - Contract Areas 1 GrassBrush/No Value MH Grass/Brush/No Valus Contract 1 MEDICAL Assist 3 Extrication HAZARDOUS SITUATION Spilis/Leaks 1 Arcing/Shorting Chemical Power Llne Down FALSE ALARM Residential Malfunction 5 Commercial Malfunction 9 Unintentional - Commercial 2 Unintentional - Residential 1 Criminal 3 GOOD INTENT Smoke Scare Steam Mistaken for Smoke Other 1 MUTUAL AID TOTAL CALLS 2 9 LOCATION OF FIRE ALARMS: TO DATE MENDOTA HEIGHTS 21 9 7 MEf�DOTA 4 1 0 SUNFISH LAKE 2 8 LILYDALE 2 9 OTI-ER 2 NUMBER OF CALLS: 2 9 STRUCTURE $0 $150 $2,200 $1,700 $1,500 � $3,500 TOTAL MONTHLY FIRE LOSSES $0 $0 $1,500 FlRE LOSS TOTALS MENDOTA HEIGHTS ALL FIRES, ALL AREAS (MONTH) _ $1,500 $7,550 MEND. HTS. ONLY STRUCT/CONTENTS $0 MEND. HTS.ONLY MISCELLANEOUS $1,850 MEND. HTS. TOTAL LOSS TO DATE $1,850 LAST YEAR 114 6 TOTAL 29 126 142 WORK PERFORMED FIRECALLS 467 2454 MEETINGS 5 6 367.5 DRILLS 144.5 501.5 WEEKLY CLEAN-UP 1 0 8 5 7 0 SPECIAL ACTIV(TY 3 1 9 8 ADMINISTATIVE 72 775 FIRE MARSHAL 6 4 434.5 TOTALS 914.5 5300.5 LAST YEAR 1334 335 368 414 AGENCY THIS MONTH TO DATE MWDOT $0 MILW. RR $0 CNR RR $4,223 OTHERS: $0 TOTALS: $0 $4,223 FIRE MAR; IfVSPECTIONS INVESTIGATIONS RE-INSPECTION MEEfINGS ADMINISTRATION SPECIAL PRQJECTS 642.5 � TOTAL 23.5 2.5 13.5 9 14.5 1 64 3 8 2 7 ( REMARKS: SEE OTHER SIDE FOR SYNOPSIS ! 9 SYNOPSIS .. The department responded to 29 fire calls during the month of June. Only one fire resulted in a dollar loss and that was a vehicle fire in Lilydale. The department also responded to three malicious false alarms at Henry Sibley High School where manual pull stations were pulled during a dance recital. The organizers were notified and Assistant Chief Lerbs had a short conversation with all in attendance at the recital. 1�iONTHLY TItAW.II�iG The mostly squad drill were utilized to training laddering tech- niques and working on laddering different buildings within the City. The whole department drill was spent was spent burning the houses on Highway 55 for removal. Overall, drilling with these houses in live burning operations offered us an excellent training tool for our new firefighters and a good refresher for our veteran firefighters. SPECIAL TRAINING During the month of June, Chief Maczko, Assistant Chief Lerbs, and Fire Marshal Paul Kaiser attended a 45 hour Hazardous Material Level I Training Session put on by the Dakota County Vo-Tech. This course was very informative and is a level that all firefighters will need to be trained to according to the State of Minnesota OHSA. The course was intense but worth the time spent. � t 2 � om ��nc r�nt YGIiC:tNl CL6ANMONTH :ALL3 CAL� CALIS ATTENDED UP DRiLt �TT`D HLIURS ATT'D THlS 3 2 ONTH MONTH YEAR YEAR HOUR FIOUR: 'i5 15 56 4d% g 12 12 50 40°fo 3 g 19 20 84 67°!0 $ 2.� 18 18.5 61 48�0 3 8 15 i5.5 78 62% 6 8 20 20.5 74 59°l0 3 8 18 18.5 71 56% 3 4.5 19 19.5 63 50% 3 4.5 2 2 26 21% 3 12 12 62 49�o g 4.g 9 9 4$ 889'n 7 7.5 55 44°k 3 18 ii 39 3�� '17 17 67 53°k 3 4.S 11 11.5 59 47% 3 3.� 23 23.5 76 60�0 1� g 20 20.5 78 62% 3 g 0 0� 24 25 $8 70% 6 8 i 5 15.5 60 48% S i6 77 6d 5i°lo 3 g 5 5 34 27�0 6 �_, 4 � �r -U ev.� 7U� 82°lo B 8 2 2 9 9.S 38 30�0 3 5 5 42 33�0 6 S.5 2 9 9.5 75 60% 3.5 ' 8 i 8 59 47°!0 3 4.5 2 1 1 2$ 22°l0 6 2 '0 20.5 99 81% 3 g 2 5 15.5 _ 59 47% 5 ta.�s 15.62 48.86 14,87 48.87 �-�_-� ��mao� �i�i�i ��i �� i � � i �� lF�� L.L I AC7'. � '� ; FIRE CALLS NO. MENDOTA HEIGHTS FlRE DEPARTMENT JULY 1990 MONTHLY REPORT 80127- 9014� ACTUAL FlRES Structure - MH Commercial Structure - MH Residential 3 Structure - Contract Areas Vehicle - MH Vehicle - Contract Areas Grass/Brush/No Value MH Grass/Brush/No Value Contract MEDICAL Assist 2 Extrication 1 HAZARDOUS SITUATION Spills/Leaks Arcing/Shorting Chemical Power Llne Down 1 FALSE ALARM Residential Malfunction 2 Commercial Malfunction 3 Unintentional - Commercial 2 Unintentional - Residential Criminal GOOD INTENT Smoke Scare Steam Mistaken for Smoke Other 2 MUTUAL AID TOTAL CALLS 1 6 MENDOTA HEIGHTS MENDOTA SUNFISH LAKE LILYDALE OTFER TOTAL RMS: 15 112 1 11 8 9 2 16 142 WORK PERFORMED HOURS TO DATE FIRE CALLS 2 8 4 2 73 8 MEEIINGS 6 6 433.5 DRILLS 52 553.5 WEEKLY CLEAN-UP 8 7 6 5 7 SPECIAL ACTIV(TY 4 2 0 2 ADMINISTATIVE 14 5 9 2 0 FIRE MARSHAL 7 9 513. 5 TOTALS 717 6017.5 STRUCTURE NUMBER OF CALLS: 1 6 MISC. TOTALS TO DATE $0 0,200 $4,800 $5,100 $20,250 $2,200 $1,700 • $3,500 TOTAL MONTHLY FIRE LOSSES $10,200 $4,800 $5,100 FlRE LOSS TOTALS MENDOTA HEIGH' ALL FIRES, ALL AREAS (MONTH) $20,100 $27,650 MEND. HTS.ONLY STRUCT/CONTENTS - $15,000 MEND. HTS.ONtY MISCELLANEOUS $6,950 MEND. FffS. TOTAL LOSS TO DATE $21,950 BILLING FOR SERVICES AGENCY THIS MONTH TO DATE MWDOT $0 MILW. RR $0 CNR RR $4,223 Ol1fRS: $0 LAST YEAR TOTALS: $0 $4.223 134 1 1 FIRE MARSHAL'S TIME FOR MONTH ' tIVVSPECTIONS ii� � 1.��►. 171 RE-INSPECTION LAST YEAR 1553.5 381 418 380 465 770.5 477.5 4445.5 MEEfINGS ADMINISTRATION SPECIAL PROJECTS TOTAL REMARKS: SEE OTHER SIDE 2 18 5 28 2 79 � � � SYNOPSIS The department responded to 16 calls during the month of July. Three of the calls that the department responded to were listed as residential structure fires. The first call was July 4th at 0235 hours, the department was dispatched to a kitchen fire at 1824 Valley Curve. The homeowner and his wife were asleep when they woke up to the smell of smoke. Smoke detector batteries were present however the batteries were dead and never did sound. A neighbor was able to knock the fire down with a fire extinguisher and prevent the fire from getting out of control. Damage was estimated at $5,000 with $4,800 to contents and $200 to the structure. The cause of the fire was listed as spontaneous combustion from oily � rags . The second call was on July 22nd at 1857 hours to 1254 Culligan Avenue. The department was dispatched to a kitchen fire, however the fire was out upon arrival. Damage was estimated at $100. Cause of the fire was determined to be newspapers close to an unattended stove which ignited and burned itself out. As a side note the owners chil- dren were home at the time and followed the proper procedures by calling 911 from a neighbor's home. This was enlightening �o hear because the children did an excellent job in practicing what they had learned. Our third structure fire occurred on July 28th at 1852 hours. A severe storm with very heavy rains had just gone through the area and the department was responding to another call at the north end of the City, when we received a call for a house fire at 2236 Bent Tree Lane. Upon arrival of the first truck on the scene flames were noted and visible coming out of the attic area at the peak of the roof. The department was able to quickly contain the fire to the attic area with minimum water damage. However, due to the heavy charring to the structural members of the roof framing and smoke damage produced an estimated dollars loss of $15,000, with $10,000 being to the struc- ture. Cause of the fire was determined to be from a lightning strike. This is the second house that has started on fire in the Copperfield area as a result of a lightning strike. The storm did keep us busy on another call of power and a accident with injuries that required extrication at and Highway 110. Due to the fact that the department was with the structure fire we requested and received mutual St. Paul. MONTffi.Y T�tA—TN.QTG lines down Dodd Road involved aid from West The monthly squad drills were utilized to familiarize the each firefighter with a way to get the maximum amount water on a large fire in the shortest possible time with a short-handed crew. The regular monthly drill was spent familiarizing all firefighters with the tech- niques of relay pumping that involved two or more pumping engines. This technique is used on major fires and in our case used in Sunfish Lake, Mendota, and Lilydale where there are no hydrants or long hy- drant lays. MEMO Date: 7-25-90 T0: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer QY :''-'. �% v SUBJECT: Building Activity Report for July 1990 CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE 90 YEAR TO DATE 89 BUILDING � � PERMITS: No. Valuation Fee Collected � No. Valuation Fee Collected � No. Valuation Fee Collected � � SFD 9 1,280,389.00 11,686.16 � 42 6,786,546.00 58,754.36 � 57 8,140,991.00 71,033.14 APT 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 TOWNHOUSE 0 0 0 � 5 638,665.00 6,023.34 ( 75 1,640,695.00 13,774 25 CONDO 16 1,278,376.00 8,176.36 � 16 1,278,376.00 8,176.36 � 7 1,500,000.00 7,49U.18 MISC. 79 88,219.00 1,742.95 � 136 1,048,771.00 18,354.64 � 123 1,047,098.00 18,427.77 C/I 3 579,975.00 2,697.18 � 18 987,549.00 7,087.51 � 22 6,045,904.00 32,599.96 -------------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Sub Total 47 3,226,959.00 24,242.65 ( 217 10,739.907.00 98,336.27 � 218 78,374.688.00 142,725.30 � � � � TRADE � � 79 2,152.00 PERMITS: � � 78 390.00 � � Plumbing 11 7,385.00 � 66 3,581.00 � 63 1,102.50 Water 10 50.00 � 50 250.00 � Sewer 3 52.50 � 43 752.50 � 107 17,996.50 Heat, AC, � � & Gas 16 6,550.00 � 91 11,064.35 � -------------------------------------------+-._.....----------------------------+---------------------------...------ Sub Total 40 8,037.50 � 250 15,647.85 ( 327 15,641.00 � � � � Licensing• � � � � Contractor's � � Licenses 26 650.00 � 364 _ 9,100.00 � 401 10,025.00 -------------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Total 113 3,226,959.00 32,930.15 � 831 10,739,407.00 24,747.85 � 946 18,374,688.00 168,391.30 NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, 41ac, and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee, and valuation amounts. Mendota Heights Police Department Memorandum July 24, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council, City Admin�:M� FROM: Dennis J. Delmont, Chief of Polic��i�� _�, v SUBJECT: fiec�,zest for Part-Time Statt?s Police Secretary Carol Bakka has requested to go on part-time status with the Police Department, working 32 hours per week, rather than the typical 40 hours. : ._ The attached memorandum was received by me quite some time ago. Due to the resignation of Becky Pentel, and the training of Bekky Trost, it was not acted upon until now. Carol Bakka has been employed by the City of Mendota Heights for quite some time, and has reached the point in her career where she would like to scale down her weekly hours. One of the primary reasons for this request is the fact that her husband travels extensively, and their time together has been cut down because of the weekday travel. Friday is, in fact, the slowest day for the clerical staff, and Bekky Trost is now:comfortable enough in her position where we feel she can easily handle the workload. With proper controls, I believe that the needs of the City, as well as those of Carol, can be met with this type of schedule. :- •�t� -�.- •� That Carol Bakka be allowed to work a 4 day, 32 hour week effective immediately with the following conditions: 1. Carol will remain available to work on her day off, if needed. This call-in work will be accomplished without overtime for hours that will amount to more than 32, but less than 4fl per week. 2. That Carol will, if necessary, provide coverage during Bekky's vacation time. c 3. That all employment benefits and conditions will be proportionately adjusted, as with other part-time employees. 4. This arrangement will be reviewed on a regular basis to determine that the needs of the Department are being met. •.� �-.i_ -� If Council concurs with the above recommendation, they should approve the change in Carol Bakka's employment status from full-time permanent, to part- time permanent, subject to the above conditions. -2- ., r February 23, 1990 TO: Dennis Delmont FROM: Carol Bakka :-.i. - • - ��i. � - � ��- Dennis, I am writing this memo to confirm the conversation we had on January 25th, regarding my request to go to a 32 hour work-week. At the time of our conversation, we decided to hold off pursuing any action on my request until after Becky's position was filled, and we were able to determine the capability of the new hire. June 1, 1990 is the date I would like to begin my permanent/part-time status. This would give the new hire ample time to become familiar with the day to day routine of the Department. Friday is the day I would like off. Past experience shows that this is the least busiest day and, of course, I would occasionally be available on an as needed basis. Just to reiterate, per our conversation, that going to a 32 hour work-week is the goal that I need, and intend, to attain at this stage in my career, and personal life. I believe that I have shown, in the past 11 years, that I am an asset to the Mendota Heights Police Department, and that by going to a permanent/part-time status, would have no affect on the job performance that I am now providing, and have provided, to the Department. Thank you in advance for taking this request into consideration. � � �-�..�� Mendota Heights Police Aepartment Memorandum July 30� 199Q TO: Mayoz, City Cauncil, City Administratar FROM: Dennis J. Delmont, Chief of Police�� SUBJECT: Info,rmation on ,��.�,xad A«ctian We recently sold our surplus vehicles by sealed bids. The fallowing is a tabulat3.on af those bids, and the net results of the sale. You will note that we had to divide the proceeds from the for£eited Blazer with the former owner. M � i] -� - �-- . .� 1986 Chevralet Capr3ce 198'7 Chevrolet Caprice Z988 Chevralet Caprice 1968 Ghevrolet Caprice 19$6 Ford Taurus 1985 Chevrolet Blazer To�al Grass: 50� of Blazer to Owner: Newspaper Ad NET PROCEEDS TO CITY: c �:7�R�i'�.i'� $ 1,500.40 2,154.04 2,850.00 2r6S0.00 1,917.00 4,501.00 $15,558.00 -2,250.50 144.72 $13,172.?$ 0 { , CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO August 3, 1990 . TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admin' FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk SIIBJECT: St. Peter's Beer License Request For the past several years, the Council has received and approved a request from St. Peter's Church for the annual Father Galtier Days for the issuance of a two day 3.2 on-sale beer license. We have again received such a request, (see attached letter of request) asking that a license for Saturday and Sunday, September 15 and 16, 1990, be granted. Hours of the beer sale will be on Saturday from 6:00 P.M. to 12:30 A.M. and on Sunday from 12:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. RECOMMENDATION/ACTION REOIIIRED Staff recommends that Council approve the request and waive the fee, consistant with our past practice in granting a license to St. Peter's Church. If Council concurs, it should pass a motion to authorize the issuance of a two day, on-sale 3.2 malt beverage license to St. Peter's Church for September 15 and 16, 1990, in conjunction with the annual Father Galtier Days, along with waiver of the license fee. KMS:kkb Attachment July 16, 1990 Sr. Secretary City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 As in prior years, St. Peter's Church will again celebrate Father Galtier Days which are scheduled for Saturday, September 15, and Sunday, September 16. As Treasurer for our 1990 celebration, I hereby request that the City Council consider our request for a temporary liquor (3.2 beer) license to be issued in conjunction with our festival. Beer will be served on Saturday from 6:00 p.m. to 12:30 a.m. and on Sunday from 12:00 p.m. until 6:00 p.m. The Council has seen fit to grant our request in the�past and we are deeply appreciative of your support. If you need any additional information for this request to become part of the agenda for your next Council meeting, please feel.free to contact me at my home phone which is 452-8983 or my work phone which is•726-8339. Sincerel urs, � Al n C. , Treasurer - Father Galtier Days 991 Caren Court Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 ACT:rjh CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO � August 3, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ��s�' FROM: Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer 0 SUBJECT: Modified Critical Area Site Plan Review - 985 Caren Road DISCIISSION Monty Girard has submitted plans for staff's review to build a family room and deck addition. The proposed proj ect is for Brett Larson who resides at 985 Caren Road. During staff's plan review process, it was noted that the Larson's lot is within the boundary of the Critical Area Overlay District. The site plan, as submitted, shows that the proposed construction is not within forty feet (40') of a 40 percent or greater slope. When this condition exists, the Critical Area Ordinance provides a modification subject to City Council review and approval. Ordinance No. 403 Section 2.3c states the following: Modifications - In the case of a minor development and/or change involving a single family dwelling, and if the site plan conforms to the standards of the Critical Area Overlay District Ordinance, the City Administrator shall bring the request to the attention of the City Council at its next regular meeting following receipt of an application for Critical Area Ordinance consideration. The City Council shall review such request and may, if it so determines, exempt the applicant from complying with any inappropriate requirements of this Ordinance. In the past, City Council has approved modified site plan submitted and also has waived the applicant's fee. Staff would recommend that- the City Council approve the Modified CAO site plan and waive the applicant's fee. ACTION REQIIIRED If the City recommendation and motion of approval. PRB : kkb Council wishes to implement the staff waive the applicant's fee, it should pass a F`� 4 Case No. CAO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS - Dakota County, M innesota APPLICATION FQR CONSIDERATION �, QF CRITICAL AREA DE VELOPMENT (Qrdinance N0. G03) Da�e of Appl.icat3.on �—� � —�� Fee Paid Receipt Idumber Applicant• � Name : ��_�� Last Address : �� vL �� Number & Street Phone : ��'�'��3 Owz�er ; Name : �C}�,p�'Sc7`n Last Atidress : �� C.,qR,�� Number & Street F �� Ci i�C�t�i� L�P.� First 1 \'2 �/LY d� �� i�y 0 �'�1. � � d y r�f State Zip Cade I `1 �- m a t� � �.�, Initial �-5 , �Y1 StaTLe Z3.p Gode � Street Locata,on af Praperty in Question: �� J� `--�-1�C�1 � O o.,� '�' Legal Description of Property: �-.o�- �� l��.k 3 �'�1�5�n5 ��,h\ar'0 ��,��-s . .. l Tyge af Request: Variance Site Plan Approval Modified Site Plan Approval l y c � Present Zoning of Property: t� �I Present Use of Property: Proposed IIse of Property: I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional me�terial are true. � Signature Applicant `1 -31-°IO Date Received by (title) Note: The following information shall be provided in the site plan: 1. Location of the property, including such information as the name and numbers of adjoining roads, railroads, existing subdivisions, or other landmarks. 2. The name and address of the owner(s) or developer(s), the section, township, range, north point, date, and scale of drawings, and number of sheets. 3. Existing topography as indicated on a contour map having a contour interval no greater than two (2) feet per contour; the contour map shall also clearly delineate any bluff line, all streams, including intermittent streams and swales, rivers, water bodies, and wetlands located on the site. 1: 4. A plan delineating the existing drainage of the water setting forth in which direction the volume, and at what rate the storm water is conveyed from the site in setting forth those areas on the site where storm water collects and is gradually percolated into the ground or slowly released to stream or lake. 5. A description of the soils on the site including a map indicating soil types by areas to be disturbed as well as a soil report containing information on the suitability of the soils for the type of development proposed and for the type of sewage disposal proposed and describing any remedial steps to be taken by the developer to render the soils suitable. All areas proposed for grading shall be identified by soil type, both as to soil type of existing top soil and soil type of the new contour. The location and extent of any erosion areas shall be included in the soils description. 6. A description of the flora and fauna, which occupy the site or are occasionally found thereon, setting forth with detail those areas where unique plant or animal species may be found on the site. r � � -- "ry-:+`' + �� ` J 1 f� � � • �- � ��'�d„ � 1'� ��7 �� + i � ; � R' : -- . ...a„'^.. �� ! � � : � �� , s - raraL �Rd�� Q� oO ` OISCOUNT ' fi O `� AMOUNT OF CHECK r, � O� """--�--p O L L A R S FIf�T.^.�l2R NEW BRIGHTON "' � BAItIK Nsw 9riphton, MN b5112 ii!0 L 3046u'+�.0960 L04? 3�: 0 � , ii' 0 L�� 'c 6 7�4 6 ii [t � : � �iUG— 1—'Y� WEL � :�1 - /' 1 {.. �►3$ + �� .,� $3Z .. 1 �+•,.15 i ;�,,,... ._Scn,Set�t. MH. � m $►�9. ja� �N � ,� � $r�Ft- L� 8�� 1� �-�"_� . �_. M� �i �qar. � � Hd.�' 985 «IPl .Zj J P _ v� �. �o��•a�s►«s �� /'� � T�repared By: . �° ' SCHOELL & MAD50N. lNC. �• ��Qineer�. SurveYor$• Plannel's. solte T�stin� 10650 Wayxata Boutevard Minnetonka' Mn. 6$343 Tel. 646-780'! J�ESGRIaiION• �y Lot 34, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLANQ HEIGNTS PLAT nr 3. � BENCIiM�RK: � ,� 1'op nut o� fire hydran� near house No. 991 Caren . Court. E�eva�ion 846.65 (Mendota Heights City � Datum) " ��N�RAL Nt}'TES:. 1) •- Qenates iran monument Fouad. 2) o- Qenotes iron monument set. �� 3} o- penotes wood stake. 4) x845.5 - Denotes existi�g spot elevativr+. 5) x(845.6� - Denotes exi$fing flaor elevatian. r; 6j � 843-��—�-�-- Denates exlsting r coatour. t�.1 .� a�ss ` ! � : ,,,,,, &�� ..... �9 �. +d�'��Q�a� r,• 1C�� .� �Q�,.. � �4��' 1 � �*L6a � ��a�� 4 r � �, C��, � �� I hereby carbt#y Lhet th15 sut`v�y wds prcparaa ued@r my supervistort nnd that I am a ticensed Land SurYtyor G�der L�e 1dwS tR� $Ldt4 O�nnmsa . 00tlOrQ . C�nb oat:; 1•�0 -94 Ueanse No. Uooe A ` �� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO August 3, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini r r FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Direc o SUBJECT: Big Wheel Auto - Assessment Roll Job No. 8809, Improvement No. 88, Project No. 3 DISCUSSION• Northland Land Company petitioned the City to install sani- tary sewer and watermain to allow construction of the new Big Wheel Auto Headquarters on the northeast corner of Pilot Knob Road and future Trunk Highway 13 on the M.A.C. site. It was determined that as part of this project, a trunk watermain would need to be installed under where future Trunk Highway 13 is to be located in order to get the needed water pressure and flow for fire protection to the Big Wheel site. This also provides a loop connection to the waternaain on LeMay Avenue serving the Mn/DOT building. Council agreed to fund this construction and some of the sanitary sewer construction adjacent to Trunk Highway 13 with Tax Increment Financing funds. These assessment costs were calculated on a frontage basis and spread over the lots (because the final plat has not yet been completed) on an area basis. Feasibility Estimate: $99,800 � Actual Costs: $152,841.00 Tax Increment Financing Participation: $72,851.00 ACTION REQUIRED: Assessment roll submitted for Council review and discussion before public hearing. JED:dfw A38E5SMENT PERIDD Sanitary Sewers - 19 years t�atermains - 14 years Storm Sewers - 19 years Streets - 10 years interest - g$ PARCEL REP13iED ONNER AND NQ. DESCRIPTION 2?-43300- Narthland Land Company 032-02 3500 80th Street W. H100 Bloan�ington, MN 55431 27-03300- Northland Land Company U23-03 3540 80th Street W. H2O0 Blno�nington, MN 55431 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ASSESSMENT R4LL BIG WHEEt RUTd SITE IMPROVEMENT N0. 88-3 JOB Nb. 8809 ADOPTEDz SUBDIVISTON Sec#ion 33 7an 28 Range 23 Pt afi N 150 Ft of E 301 Ft ofi SE 1/4 ofi t� 1/9 Ly NW'ly ofi a iine beq 31.93 �t. H of NE Cor Lot 1� Blk 6 Gardenville Rearr Sld on Cur Anqle 8D23MbS i58.A8 F#. S 11DSM3S W 121.33 Ft Def L on Tangular Cur Ang 24D17M5S 4d8.53 Ft S d4D39M3S � 154.83 Ft L on Tang Cur Rad 1350.92 Ft. to W Line of E 341 ft & There tersinating. Section 33 Twn 28 Range 23 SE 1!4 oi NE 114 !.y N af RR & SW'ly pfi a line Beg 31.43 Ft W nfi NE Cor Lot 1 Blk b Gardenville Rearr 5W on Cur Ang 8D23M65 258.48 fit S 11D5M3S W 121.33 Ft. Def L on 7ang Cur Ang 24D17M54S 469.53 Ft 5 bRD30M3S W 154.8 Ft L on Tang Cur Rad 1350.9 F# to Int RR & Ther� Term Ex Yl 349 Ft Ex E 209 Ft ofi W 558 Ft of N 455.6 F{ & Ex N 150 Ft of E 301 Fi. m lDT BlK SANI7RRY ND. N0. SEWERS -- -- 513.02 WATER TOiAl MAINS S16.�8 � ASSESSMENT RATES Assessed amaunts determined an a lineal foot basia but distribpted to previously unasseased parcela, on a square £ootage basis, within thzee desiqnated areas �{see fiie}, i24.80 -- -- 54�947.79 f6�375.78 511,323.57 �� , r� PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND N0. DESCRIPTION 2�-03300- Northland Land Company 022-02 3500 BOth Street W. Ni00 Bioomington, MN 55431 2�-03300- Northland Land Company fl22-01 3504 BOth Street bF. #100 Blaomingtan� MW 55431 27-03300- Northland Land Campany 030-41 3504 8flth Street �1. #104 Blaomington, MN 55431 SUHDIVI5ION Section 33 Twn 28 Range 23 Pt of E 209 Ft ofi W 558 Ft af N 455.6 Ft af SE 3f4 of t� 1/4 Ly NW'ly of a line Beg 31.93 ft ld o�f NE cor Lot 1 Block � Gardenville Rearr SW on Cur Ang 8D23M6S 159.48 Ft S 11DSM33 W 121.33 Ft De4 L on Fan £ur Ang 24A171959S 466.53 ft S 69D30M3S W 154.83 Ft. L on Tan Cur Rad 1350.92 Ft ta Iat IS of Line & There 3erm Sec#ion 33 Tan 28 Range 23 W ISOftoft3230Ft&5 180Ftaf£3AcsofS20 Rds ofi NE 1/9 of NE 1/A Ly W'Iy afi a 2ine Heg 32.93 Ft 4! of WE Cor Lot i Elk 6 Gardenville Rearr S!d on Cur Ang SD23M6S 158.4$ ft S I1D SM35 W f21.33 Ft Def L on Tang Cur Ang 24D17M59S 468.53 �t 8 64D30M3S W 154.83 Ft L an Tang Cur Rad 1350.92 Ft to Int S Line NE 1/Q a# NE 1/4 & There Tera�. Section 33 7wn 26 Range 23 E350FtofW7Aof S2d Rods ofi NE 1/4 of NE liA LOT BLK SANITARY WATER TOTAL N0. N0. SEWERS MAINS -- -- f3,819.35 f4�921,66 SB,741.01 -- -- f2�430.50 f3�131.97 55�562.47 -- -- f5i012.90 Sb�459.b8 f22i472.58 `Y �;J PARCEL REPUTfD OtdNER AND NQ. AE3CRIPTION 2'7-03300- Nartfi2and land Company 012-QS 35Q4 89th Street W. N140 Bloominqton, MN 55431 :'` � 27-48270- irip2e 5. Inves#ments 010-01 2304 Pilot Knob Road Mendota Heights, MN 55120 27-�1250- Northland Land Company 091-01 3544 84th S#reet ti. #100 Bloomington, MN 55R31 27-71250- Northland l.and Company 151-01 3500 BOth Street N. M100 Bloamington, MN 55432 27-71250- Narthland i.and Campany 161-OS 3500 B4th Street W. #lS00 Bloomington, MN 55A31 SUHDIVISION Section 33 Twn 28 Range 23 Pt oi E 24b F# of N 234 ft ofiE3acsofS20Rdsof NE il4 af NE 1I4 ty W'ly cf a line Beg 31.93 fit W of NE Cor Lot 1 Blk 6 6ardenvi3le Rearr 5W on Cur Ang 6D23M6S 158.48 fit. S S1D5M33 bl 121.33 Ft Def L an Tang Gur Ang 29D1?M59S to Int S line Mendota Heights Business Park South Lanes Pt of lot5 $& 9, $Ik I& Vac leMay Ave Adi ly E'ly of a Line Coa� 22.86 Ft E of NW Cor Lot 8 Blk i S 4D 39MA15 E 104.43 Ft S 296.56 Ft Sw on Tang Cur Rad 1248.92 Ft W Line ot Sect & There tera�inati�g. South Lanes Lots 2 thru 7 6 lots 30 Thru 15 Bik 1& Vac LeMay Ave Adj South lanes Lots 1& 16 Blk 1& Vac LeMay Ave Adj LOT BLK SANITARY WATER 70TAL N4. tdD. SEWERS �IAZNS -- -- f1�128.A4 f1y459.13 52�582.57 1 2 S9,I58.00 f14��62.60 528,920.00 -- -- 5169.92 f274.98 l449.90 -- -- S2�U19.00 f3�2d7.36 f5�28b.3d -- -- 5334.93 #549.48 i869.81 e #.:. � PARCEI REPUTED OWIVER AND t�D, DESCRIPTIQN 27-71258- Nor#hland Land Company 083-Q2 3500 84th Street 9f. #104 8loomington, MN 55431 27-�1250- Northiand la�d Campany 132-02 3500 64th Street W. #100 Bloamington, MN 55431 27-71250- Nnrthland Land Company 144-02 3500 80th Street W. ti1p0 $loomington, MN 55431 SUBDIVISION South Lanes P#oflots7&8B2k2dc Vac LeMay Avenue & Dean St adj Ly £'ly af a Line Com 22.66 fi E at NW Cor Lot 8 Blk 1 S 4D39M41S E 104.43 fit S 29b.56 Ft Sw ofi Tang Cur Rad 1248.42 Ft to bl Line of Sec & There Term Ex Pt Piatted as Mendota Neights Business Park Sauth Lanes Lots 2 thru G& Lots 4 thru thru 13 Hlk 2& Vac LeMay Rve & Dean St adj Ex Pt Platted as Mendota Heights Business Park South Lanes Pt of Lot 1& 14 Hlk 2 & Vac leMay Ave & Dean St Ad Ly W'ly of a Line Com SE Cor Lot 15 Hlk 1 S on S'ly Ext of E l.ine Lot 15 to bl'ly R/W S1H 13 & There Term Ex Pt Platted as Mendota tleights Husiness Park LOT BLK SANITARY WA7ER TOTAL N0. N0. SEWERS MAIt�tS -- -- 5199.90 #323.50 3523.40 -- -- 51�349.48 S2ai83.63 f3�S33.i1 -- -- 5254.87 f420.55 5680.42 t v � . •� a I_� : t�l�l A �V•1:1 �J ��Z� � l � J � h � �.. ' Q � U NtTEU _ PR�OpER.'T' .Z�� ...uC�'-�- C...w, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admi is� or FROM: James E. Daniel on Public Works Di,re SUBJECT: Assessment Rol North Ivy Hills nd Job No. 8220 Improvement No. 88, DISCUSSION• Addition Proj ect No . 6 August 1, 1990 Council ordered a public hearing to consider assessments for the North Ivy Hills project at the August 21st meeting. Staff has completed the assessment roll for Council review and comments prior to the hearing. This project was petitioned for by Mr. Vern Colon to serve his 10 lot subdivision, however it also includes some storm water assessments for nearby residents whose water drains into this project. Also as part of this project the City connected two dead end streets, Miriam and Hiawatha Streets, for fire and safety reasons and looped the watermain. The water- main work is to be paid for out of the Utility Fund and the street work out of General Obligation. Mr. Bob Morin, 963 Chippewa, who owns several vacant lots adjacent to his home on Chippewa, had a small wetland without any outlet, also petitioned the City to have an outlet installed so that those lots might be developed. This was a very small job and it was combined with Mr. Colon's project in order to try and obtain more competitive bids. The drainage area of Mr. Morin's wetland included several of his neighbor's lots who were notified that they would be assessed some of the costs to install the storm sewer to control the elevation of the wetland. Costs for the combined projects resulted in the following final assessment rates: 1.) Colon Lots Sanitary Sewer Water Storm Street Feas. Est. $2,520.00 2,420.00 2,998.00 3,635.00 Actual $2,121.16 2,879.85 2,988.34 2,943.55 TOTAL $12,433.00 $10,932.90 ($1,411.90 below feasibility estimate) Feas. Est. Actual 2.) Cost to Utility Fund for looped watermain: $7,200.00 $4,380.82 ($2,819.18 below estimate) 3.) Cost to G.O. for connecting Miriam/Hiawatha Streets: $10,000.00 $17,192.03 ($7,192.00 over estimate) 4. Morin Storm Sewer Project: $20,000.00 $22,993.42 ($2,993.42 over estimate) ACTION REQUIRED• For information/discussion only. JED:dfw n.s wi� . atia� Sanitary�S - 19 years Wa4ermains 19 years Starm Sewers - 14 years S#reets - 10 years Interest - PAFi�EL REPUTED OWt�R AND 1�l0. DESCRIP7IQN 27-03400- Thomas D. & Roxanne M. Koenen 0?0-04 SSS Miriam Street Mendqta Heights, MN 55118 27-d394Q- David V. & i�srie B Johnson 030-09 559 Miriam Street Mendota Heights, MN 55118 27-43944- �-Y�I � � �.ois liefi2efiinyer 040-09 569 Miria� Street .;�;:r� Mendota Heights, MN 55i18 27-3i300- Mary E. Bystrom 120-01 , 557 Si�nard tlendota Heights, MN 55118 V 1 1 i Uf i'IGIVt1U i ii ht2bti 1 b ASSESSMENT ROLL NORTH iVY HIL4S 2ND ADDITION IMPR4VEMENT t�l0. 88-6 JOB N0. 8220 ADOPTED: SUHDIVISION Auditprs Subdiviszon No. 4 At af �ot 9 Cam Int f Line & S Line Eugenia Ave W on St 143.5 Ft l. 70D23M30S 124.80 ft l 209D3SM30S 91.39 Ft L on E Line Lot 9 140.16 Ft tn Heg Sub3 to �smnt avar S 30 �t Ex 27-03900-030-09 Auditors Subdivision No. 4 Pt of Lot 9 Som S Line L 13 Guad Hgts 4.5 Ft E af SW Cor N to Pt Cn �! �i.ae 3�.58 Ft N ofi SW Car & 9eg Cont N 19.93 �'t NE to Pt Where 5 �ine Eugenia St Int id �ine L 13 3 to Pt of Beg. Auditors Suhdivision No. 4 Pt of l.ot 9 Com S I.ine Eugenia Ave. i32.5 Ft W ofi Int S E.ine S# & E line lot 9 W 132.5 Ft L 90D13M 113.8 ft L 89D 47M 91.40 Ft l 34D 23C1 34S lP4.84 Ft #o Beg Subj to Es�nnt over S 30 Ft & W 10 Ft. Guadalupe Heights Sanftary Sewer � Service - $ 2.221.26 pez n �' Water Main & ServiCe - ^ $ ,�,A79.85. pei Streats S � aaa_ss PeY --- � Storm Sewer - Colon $ 2,988.34 Per lot ' Storcn SLnoer - Other $ per sq ft. '� �+ A,1d9fi-_ Storm Sewer - Morin - Trunk S q 7„s�c per sq. ft. Stpzm SeweY - Othar S_ry,�apn per sq. ft. Morin Water San. a Waten $ �,tia�_�a per lot. � Services LOT BLK SANITARY WATER STORM STREETS SANITARY & TOTAL ND. N0, SEWER & SiAIN & SEWER WAiER SERVICES SERUICE S£RVTCE ONLY -- f.40 5.00 i47$.41 E.QO 5.44 54�8.41 m m S.fl4 f,04 31,004.49 i.40 f.44 fb28.01 12 1 f.00 5.00 5313.65 5.00 5,46 f.00 f.d4 51,009.49 f.44 4626.01 � #.00 f313.85 � t30. DESCRIP7ION 27-31300- �ew J. & Virginia Koenen 131-41 Sb5 �iriam Siree# Mendota Heights, MN 55118 27-31300- Robert A. & Rose�ary Morin 03d-02 4b3 Chigpewa Avenue Mendota Heiqhts, MN 55118 27-313Q0- Robert R. & Rasemary Morin 044-02 4b3 Chippewa Avenue Mendata Heights, MN 55i18 27-31304- Fred 3. & Fredric �ike 050-02 547 3imard Mendota Heiqh#s, MN 55118 27-31300- Thomas L& G.J. Lencowski 061-42 550 Si�ard 5treet �endota Heights, MN 55435 27-31300- David A. & Anna M. Ma2ay 47b-02 554 5imard 5#reet flendota Heights, MN 55118 27-31340- Cecilia A. 0'Donnell 080-Q2 545 Miriam Avenue Mendota Heights, MN 55118 27-31300- Russel Jr. & Audry Ward `� ' ' 100-02 541 Miriam Mendota H�igh#s, MN 551f8 27-31300- Harbara A. Dunn 110-02 537 {4iriaa� Street Mendota Heights, MN 55118 27-32340- Eveline Greppendorfi I20-02 531 Miria�a Street . Mendata Heights, MN 55118 27-31300- Leonard H. & Steila Pieper 130-02 529 Miriam Street Mendota xeights, Mfi 55118 N0. N0. SEWER & �AFN & SEWER - WATER SfiRVTC ^ ,y � 'i SERVICE SERVICE ONLY Guadalupe Heights 13 1 5.00 4.00 5.00 5,00 f.00 5.00� Lyi�g � of line Beg S lfne tSee 2?-4340Q-020-Q4) . , 4.5 ft E of SW Cor N to pt on W line 37.5B fit N of SW Car & There Term of Lat 13, Blk 1. Guadalupe Heights 3 2 ail of Guadalupe Neiqhis 4 2 All of Lots 1& 2 Bik 2& All of Guadalupe Neiqhts S 2 Guadalupe Heights 6 2 Guadalupe Heights 7 2 Guadalupe Neights 8 2 Guadalupe Heights 10 2 All of Lot 9 blk 2& bl 2/2 ofi Guadalupe Heights 11 2 EII2ofF.atlQBik2& All 04 Guadalupe Heighta 12 2 Guadalupe Heights S.00 5.00 E4,504.90 5.40 5.00 f$,bb4.29 5.44 5.�4 51�241.83 f.00 5.00 f1�172,64 5.00 2.04 5.00 5.00 f .00 13 2 f.00 �.00 #1,034.86 s.oa sazo.4o 5.00 f1,241.83 f.00 fi�241.83 5.04 5424.47 5.00 f965.87 5.00 5.00 59,504.90 4.00 f2,642.28 f10,306.57 S.d4 f.d4 51,241.83 s.00 f.00 5.04 5.00 f.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 51�172.84 f.00 f1,034.86 i.40 5620.44 5.00 x1,291.83 5.00 51,241.83 5.00 5924.47 5.40 f96S.87 tJO.y_y ..'SCRiFTiOtS .. ...._ 27-31304- Trinidad 3r & Glaria Uribe 150-02 969 Ch:ippewa Avenue Mendota Heights, MN 55118 27-31300- Arthur F. Neher 1b0-02 9?5 Cbippewa Avenue Mendota Heights, MN 55118 27-31300- Alfred H. & Harriet L. Diem 100-44 - 552 Ctiriaa� Streat Mendota Heights, MN 55116 27-31300- Muri E. Cru�a 110-04 S56 Miriam Street Mendota Heights, MN 55118 27-31300- Adrian & Deborah J, £ckert 120-OA 560 Miriam Street Mendota Neights, CIN 55if8 27-31300- Stanley S& Mariann Dupre 134-04 Sb0 Miriam Street Mendota Heiqhts� MN 55218 27-31344- Jxmes d. & Debra Cascalenda IR4-d4 568 Mi�iam 5treet .,., Mendota Heights, MN 55118 27-31300- Michael & Uirqinia Fastner 150-04 572 Miriam Mendota Heights, MN 55118 27-52201- Federal La�d Company 410-01 3474 WasfiiAgton Drive, iliQ2 Eagan} MN 55222 27-52201- f'ederal La�d Caa�gany 020-01 3470 Wa�hingtan Drive, #202 Eaganf MN 55122 .,. �..._.... Guada2upe Heights All ofi Lat 14 Blk 2& Lying N of Line Com NE Cor !d #o Ft o� !d line 29 Ft S afi Ntt# Car Pt af �uadalupe Heights 16 2 P# of.Lot f5, Blk 2 lying S of Line Com NE Cor W to Pt on W Line 15 Ft S of NW Cor and a21 of �uadalupe Heights 10 4 £x E33Ftofl,ot4Blk4 & E 46 Ft of L 30, Hlk 4. 6uadalape Heights ik 4 Ex E 46 Ft of Lot 10� Hlk 4 and all ofi Guadalupe Neights 12 4 �uadalupe Heights 13 4 Guada2upe Heights 14 4 �.. . ..�.. ...., .. . ..... ... . .... ...., . ., � �.�a. � o arnMi � rirt 1 a t U i H� �. tSO. NCJ. SE4lER & MAIN & SEWER WAT£R BERVIC£ - SERVICE SERVICE ONLY � 15 2 5.04 5.00 S551.92 S.Qd f.00 f551.92' • Guadalupe Heights North Ivy Hills 2nd Addition Horth Ivy Hills 2ad Additian f.00 f.00 i827.87 5.00 f.00 i827.97 s.00 5.00 51�534.82 f.40 S.Q4 S.Od f437.18 #.00 t.00 f.00 f1�206.97 5.00 f.00 f.00 f2,297.55 5.00 x.U4 S.aa f2,247.55 f.00 15 4 #.00 f.00 S2ab84.52 5.00 1 1 52�121.16 f2�879.85 f2y993.55 S2l988.34 2 1 523121.15 f2s879.$5 f2�943.55 52�488.3A m 5,00 51,634.82 3.Ofl i937.i8 5,00 S1r206.97 5.00 52,297.55 5.40 52�297.55 f.q0 s2,680.52 5.00 f10,932.9Q s.OQ f10,432.90 N0, nESCf2IPTI0N 27-52201- Federal tand Company 030-01 3970 Washinqton Drive, #102 Eagan� MN 55122 27-52201- Federal Land Company 040-01 3470 Washingtcn Drive, #1102 Eagan� MN 55222 27-52201- Cameron G. & Nancy C. Kruse OSO-02 405 Cheri l.ane Mendota Heights� MN 55120 27-52201- Federai land Company �060-01 3470 Washington Drive, NI02 Eagant MN 55122 � 27-52201- Federal Land Company 070-01 3470 Washington Drive, N102 £agan, �!N 55122 27-52201- Federal Land Company 08Q-41 3470 Wdshington Drlvei 1#202 Eagan, MN 55122 27-52201- federal Land Company d94-41 3474 Washington Drive, H102 £agany MN 55122 27-5224i- Federal Land Company =�+^%;100-01 3470 Washington Drive, #102 Eagant CIN 55i22 a Narth Ivy Hills 2nd Addition North Ivy Hills 2nd Additian North Ivy Hills 2nd Addition North ivy Hills 2nd Addiiian North Ivy Hills 2nd Addition North Ivy Hills 2nd Addition North Ivy Hilis 2nd Addition North Ivy Nilis 2nd Addition �... .. .. ..�.._ ,..�.. «., � 4�� vna•� a � ntc � a �HN2 t HKY & TDTRL � N0. hl0. SEW£R & CiAIN & fiEWER WA'F£R SERUXCf * SERVICE SERVICE ONLY a 3 I 52�121.16 52,879.85 52�443.55 f2�48$.34 5.00 f20,932.401 � 4 1 f2�121.16 52,879.85 f2,9q3.55 52,986,3q f.00 510,932.90 • 5 1 52�121.16 52,879,85 f2�443.55 f2�488.34 5.40 S1Q,932.4Q d f S2sl21.i6 f2�879.95 52,443.55 S2i9B8.34 5.44 s20,432.90 7 1 52,12�.16 52�879.85 f2r943.55 E2�988.34 5.00 S1Q�932.90 8 1 S2�121.16 S2,879.85 52�943.55 �2�988.34 5.00 f10,932.90 9 1 f23122.ib f2,874.85 52�443.55 52,966.34 S.4Q #1Ot432.94 10 1 f2,i21.i6 #2�879.85 f2�943.55 t2,988.34 5,00 f10�932.90 � • , � �� ` � D� �� 1 � �• � , . �� , � � ��!�00�`ili�il a, � � �� ; - �� - !!� �I �► .. . a .. . a. .r _ a.. � �.�. ,..��.� _ � 1,� ��:. _ ,�.,.r.,.:,- ;,,,�,.,,,,,,,,,, � �,.- . , #�;:. ,�11 4 � �J: _.-� � � r. , ' v_!�L��`�'/` ; „ :° � /+ - � . � � � ci� `� :!/�� Q .,,Q�r �� r��i� � '�, ::; +.!;i � �� a,�,� � � - �� _..� �� .' � ' ,.r....,�.s,n..�q�er�<qmi.a�.►,�s-wr�noR � � = �� tt � ' �� 0 • _ �:— � �;��:� , • � � � �► , 0 % .� 4 • a ��► vi a �. , O . a � o� ..o .o s � o s �:s . � � v� � a �� . . �� . . „�;:.�..�: • ,,,,. _ ; ov_ �, o ��, ., e �: P . � ■ ; , eo a . �vj .,,...,..,�/�;.:��. - o a • l, �► � � /�J.��'.'/..�'i�%/'w.11,iv'..�i.":� -� � 1 Y ►��Q ��.0� � , ;� � � o. O � ra e �� ': . � � • ��I r� �'►^ " ' �' `_ - , �'� �o ��► ____ v . = ��• : � • • � � V , , , '! � , �. ' } h, � • �,`,` , �. � �. f� � .� �� , 1.t • �/ ��u � i' �_ ' '♦ ��! �_l.. `-l.�_.' � _.L_l�� -------�� --�`--1�IOR�1 N.--ST��'bi��1 N ----- 6 r� � ''4.' ~ �.�. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO August 1, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini��:�� FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works ire o SUBJECT: Ivy Falls Creek Assessment Roll Job No. 8704, Improvement No. 87, Project No. 2 DISCUSSION• This project was originally subdivided by Mr. Carl Anderson but ultimately developed by Mr. Keith Heaver. During feasibility preparation neighbors to the east of the project were contacted to see if they desired to have the project include them and they did. Mr. Heaver did his own site grading whereas the City com- pleted it for the sepamte lots to the east, this accounts for the much higher street assessments for those lots. Assessments for this project came in very close to the feasibility estimate see below: Feasibility Assessments Approved by Council Lots Feas./Lot Heaver $120,546 10 School Dist. 63,488 �3 Blum 9,126 .5 Sullwald 9,126 .5 Licha 18,254 1 Robinson 3,513 - ACTION REQUIRED: S12,054.60 21,162.67 18,254.00 18,254.00 3,513.00 Final Costs $120,247.00 46,514.81 6,891.12 6,891.12 13.782.27 3,470.19 Per i,ot Cost � $12,024.70 15,504.94 13,782.27 13.782.27 3,470.19 Belaw Feas. Est. $ 29.90 i 5.657.73 � 2,235.87 2,235.87 4,471.73 42.81 The attached assessment roll is for Council information and discussion prior to next meeting's public hearing. JED: dfw ASSESSMEN'F PERIOD Sanitary 5ewers - 19 years blatermains - 19 years fi#orn� Sewers - 24 years Streets - 10 years Interest S� PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND N0. DESCRIA'iION 27-37625- Tho�as & Barbara Krawczersk 4f4-01 Q4 Acker Street East 5t. Paul� MN 55117 27-3Jb25- Neaver 4evelop Inc. 020-01 David L. Casper 1i34 Smith Avenue S. 41est 3t. Aaul, C1N 55118 27-37b25- Heaver Develop Inc. 434-01 David t. Casper 1130 Smith Avenue 5. West St. Aaul� MN 552I8 27-37625- Heaver Develop Inc. 040-01 David L. Casper 1130 Smitn Avenue S. West St. Paul, MN 55118 27-37625- Heaver Develop Inc. Oid-02 David l. Casper 1230 Smith Avenue S. West St. Paul� MN 55118 27-37625- Heaver Deve2op Iac. 020-02 David I.. Cxsper 1I30 5mith Avenue 5. Wesi St. Paul, MN 55118 2�-37b25- Heaver Deve2op Inc. 034-42 David L. Casper 1130 Smith Avenue S. West St. Paul, MtS 55118 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �� Ivy Falla Cxeek T.T. Smiths Sub. No. 3 ASSESSMEN7 ROLL san. serviae - S86z.95 per iat sanftazy Servicn - gi,3�9.55 per IoC IVY FALLS CREEK ADDI7ION watermain z service - S2,4oz.66 pez' lot watermain a service - 2,9'76.96 per 1ot IMPROVEMENT N0. $%-2 Street - $4,2A6.2i per 2ot Street & Gradinq (Sfi8.173 per ft.} JOB N0. 6704 Storm Sewer - $4,512.88 per lot - ?,940.76 per iot Storm Sewera = 54.094 per sq. ft. ADOPTED: SUBDIVISiON LOT BLK SANITARY WATER S7REET5 STORM TO?AL N0. N0. SEWERS MAIt3S SEWERS Ivy Falls Creek Addition 1 1 5862.95 t2,402.bb 54,246.21 f4,512.86 f12,029.�0 Ivy Faiis Greek Additian Ivy Fa12s Creek Addition Ivy Falls Creek Addition Ivy Falls Creek Addition Ivy Falis Creek Addition Ivy Falls Creek Addition 2 I i$62.95 i2�402.bb f4,24b.21 f4}512.8$ f12�02d.70 3 I f8b2.95 Y2�Q02.66 f4�296.21 S4t512.89 f12,024,70 4 1 SB62.95 f2�402.66 34,246.21 f4�512.88 f12r024.70 1 2 SBf,2.95 32�442.b6 S4t2R6.21 44�512.88 g12,A24.70 2 2 48b2.95 52�402.bb i4,246.2i f4,522.86 t22,024.70 3 2 5862.95 f2,402.66 #R,246,21 t4,512.88 412,024.70 PARCEL REPUTED dWAtER AND N0. DESCRIPTION 2�-37625- Char2es E. & Jadith M. Golla OAO-02 2176 Wel7.esley Avenue St. Paul., MN 551Q5 2i-3J625- Heaver Bevelop Inc. 050-02 David L. Casper 1130 Smith Avenue S. West St. Paul, MN 55118 27-37625- Heaver Develop Inc. 060-02 David L. Casper l230 Saith �tvenue S. West St. Pauly MN 55118 2?-b47b2- Dennis J. & Nancy Stevens 121-02 2935 Mest Service Road Eagan, MN 55121 2�-69702- Gregory J& Patricia Roedle 140-02 Rodney D. Ives Fimo#hy 3. McManus 1912 Gaodrich Avenue St. Paui� MN 55105 27-69702- Timothy J. McManus 162-02 665 Hrookside Lane Mendata Heigbts, MN SS12B 27-69702- Warren J. Jr., & Joan Robinson 020-OS 2375 Laura Mendota Heignts� MN 55118 27-64702- Robert & Marjorie Lfcha 091-OS 6A9 lst Avenue Mendota Heightsr MN 55118 27-69702- Thomas & Margaret Blum 110-OS 649 lat Avenue Mendota Heighis� MN 551i8 27-69702- Robert J. & Diane M. Sullwold 130-45 �endota Heighiss MN 551f8 SUBBIVISION Ivy Fa12s Creek Additian ivy Fa12s Creek Addition Ivy Falls Creek Additian Smfth T.T. Subdivision No. 3 Lots 5,6,11 & 12 Blk 2 Swith T.T. 5ubdivision No. 3 Lots 3,4,13 & 14� Blk 2 Smith T.T. 5ubdivision No. 3 Lots 1,2, 15 & ib, BloCk 2 Smith T.T. Subdi,vision No. 3 Lots 1& 2� Block 5 Smitb T.7. Subdivision No. 3 Lots 3& A, Block 5 Smith T.T. Subdivision No. 3 All af Lot b Blk 5 and all af Lot 22, Black 5 Smith T.T. Subdivision No. 3 Lot i2,��loc�C Si��W 24A�t ai Lot 13, Block S �, LOT BLK SANITARY WATER S7REETS 570RM TOTAL ND, ND. SEWERS MAINS SEWERS 4 2 f862.95 52�402.b6 f4�246.21 54�512.88 512,029.70 S 2 f862.45 f2�442.bb f4�24b.21 54�522.88 fi2,42A.70 6 2 5862.95 52,402.66 f4�246.21 S9r512.88 t12,02A.70 -- -- S2f374,55 l2,976.96 f��940.�6 53�267.6� 515,544.94 -- -- 51�379.55 f2�976.96 5��940.�6 53�207.67 515�504.94 -- -- #1,379,55 52�976.9b f��940.76 53�207.6� f15,509.94 . -- -- 5.00 f.00 fll485,00 f2}985.19 f3,470,19 -- -- 41J379.55 52�47b.96 S?}44d.7b t1,4$5.00 f13,782.27 -- -- f689.76 S1y488.49 f3}970.38 f792.S0 56�891.12 -- -- 5689.76 x1�488.49 f3�970.38 t742.50 f6,891.12 w "++.�thi � � � � \ .J,� ti �� y \ \ 6 �' � . . I \ � • ` ' d � � •� � �v . _� a �► i '� ,: � o s �►a . .. 1, . • , ., �� i� �. . . . A� s�► � .. � � .. . Q, , ... �;,,;� p .., �aa �.� �. ��,U. .,,.,,,,,,,,,, :•:. . .- , : _, ,..,,.,.,,. , . , ,,.,,.. ,. , . � % ::,,':/..zv/:.:. /��: �%�%O�//�� /ii/�.�ii:�i /�/J///�% /'� i i , I • v�iio:nii iiiini : �� r _ 1--�" ' - ��:; •.,;,'�n: , c - � . .- � � . :ir.�fcG�.�.•. ' ' � ��I ��1_ � �� =. �� ...� �o o�,� �„60 0, — � . �� ea�� ee�� , � _ , _ �� - �u�s��o - �--:��d�� : �o.,,..U,,,,,...,.,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,.<�. � � � � - ��e�� a� . � oOOQ a�i�l� ,-�.�0000 l�.......�l�� ; . � � "�� , �r�� . �;;,;;,�,,,,,,,�,,. , T. �� 1�� `'•%%��,-� ��d • �� ,.%//i�,��ii//%/�l/ i„ll�_/�� -- �Y`J� �'�4 L_ �S. _ GR��IC. 1�D�. __ _ . _.. � - �� i��.__._c_��----=-_ ._ -- : •� = ,� � ; . CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO August 1, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminisc�.�-g.'{y� FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Di e o SUBJECT: Alice Lane Assessment Roll Job No. 8911, Improvement No. 89, Project No. 3 DISCUSSION• Mr. Jack Blesener along with Mr. Vernon Eide petitioned the City to extend Alice Lane to serve six new lots. In conjunction with this project, two neighbors to the east of those lots needed sanitary sewer and petitioned to have a line extended to serve them. During the feasibility study preparation it was shown that Alice Lane could be extended northerly and 4 to 5 more lots could be developed. The people that owned that land initially ex- pressed an interest to have the road extended, but eventually changed their minds. Council, in the feasibility study approval, agreed to hold•the storm sewer costs for these future lots which would be included in the assessment at the time the road and utilities are extended to the north. The feasibility costs for this project were revised upward after the bids were opened and ultimately came in even higher due to unexpected overhead costs (see below): Feas. Est. Eide/Blesener $12,500 Revised Est. after bid o eninq $15,000 Gangel/Hennessey (Sanitary Hookup) $ 3,843 Delayed Storm Sewer $ 4,600 ACTION REQUIRED: Not Revised Not Revised Final Costs $15,447.85 $ 3,731.65 $ 7,244.25 The attached assessment roll is for Council information/dis- cussion in preparation for next meetings public hearing. JED:dfw ASSESSMENT PERYOD Sanitary Sewers - 19 years Watermains - 19 years Storm Sewers - 14 years Streets - 10 years Interest - 8� CI3Y OF M6NDQTA HEIGHTS A5SE8SClEtJ7 ROLi. AIICE LANE IMFROVEMENT N0. 89-3 JOB NQ. 8412 ADOPTEA: PARCE� REPUTED pWNER AND SUBDIVISION t�t0. DESCRIPTF�N 27-03500- Paui 6c Denise M. Sazama Section 35, 7wn 2B Range 23 46I-fll 2251 Dodd Road P# qf t� ll�i of RtE 2l9 of NE 1!4 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Beg. 450 Ft 3 of NE Cpr S 210 Ft W 272 Ft N 210 Ft E ta Beg Sub,j to TN 99 27-03540- George & Yvonne Gangl Section 3S Twn 28 Range 23 Q40-01 2227 Dodd Raad S 135 Ft ofi N 450 Ft ot E Mendota Heights, MN 55120 300 Ft of N 1/2 ofi NE 1/4 27-23365- John K& lisa J. Qmadt Eide Estates 390-01 59 Logan Avenue West West St. Paul� MN 55118 27-23365- Vernon M. S� Alice �. Eide Eide Estates 010-02 7200 Gahi21 Raad #203 £dina, MN 55435 27-i1250- Bleserser Builders, Inc. AI1LB Lane Subdivisian O1Q-01 1815 Twin Circle Drive Mendota Heightsy MN 55118 .`. 27-11250- Blesener Huilders, Inc. Alice l.ane Subdivision 020-01 1815 Twin Circle Drive Mendota Neights, 3�N 55118 27-12250- John K, & Mary S. Nood Alice Lane Subdivision 414-42 1474 laure3 St. Paul, MN 58104 27-11250- Blesener Bui2ders, IRc. Alice Lane Subdivision 020-02 1815 Twin Circle Drive Ctendota Neights, MN 55118 �< ,w LOT BI.K. SANITARY & WATER & N0. N0. SERVICE SERUICE -- -- 53,731»65 f.00 HbDtSbMhN'1' 1WY'GD Alice Lane 8 Eide Estates Sanitary & 5ervice - $2.634.35 per iot Water & Service 2,103.08 per lot Storm Sewers - 1,224.b7 per lot Streets - 3,628.69 per lot Grading - 5,852.8fi per Iot Others Sanitar7/ & Sexvice - 53,731.65 per lot ST4RM STREETS GRADING 5EWERS ' TOTAL f.04 5.00 5.00 t3,731.b5 -- -- , t3,731.65 5.00 f.00 5.00 4.00 g3,731.65 34 f 52,639.35 52,293.48 f1i224.b7 f3�628.69 S5,$S2.Ob f15,447.$5 1 1 2 1 2 2 f2�b39,35 f2,103.08 i1,22A.b7 f3,628.69 55,852.06 s15,Q47.85 1 i2,639.35 S2�iO3.88 51�224.b7 f3,62$.b9 f5,852.Ob 415�4A7.85 1 x2,b39.35 52�143.08 fi�224,67 f3,b28.b9 55,852.06 f15,447.85 2 42�639.35 f2y143.06 51�229.67 f3�,628.b9 f5,8S2.06 2 52�634.35 52,103.0$ f1,224.b7 S3yb28.S9 i5,8S2.46 f15,947.85 515,447.85 � • • • e � I , .`' ': _�►�►�r � r• _�►rr_�•��r��: ± �. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO August 3, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ SUBJECT: Proposed ANIl�! Dues Increase INTRODUCTION Recently the City received information from the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities describing a proposal which, if implemented, would result in a significant increase in our annual ANIlK dues. It is the intent of this memo to describe the proposal and its possible fiscal impacts, so that the Council may adopt a formal City position relative to this proposal. BACKGROUND Recently the ANIlK commissioned its Mission and Membership Service Task Force to review the broad purposes and effectiveness of the ANII�! as an Association representing the Cities' interest. With the issuance of a twenty page final report, the year long review was recently completed and a number of recommendations were offered to improve the quality of representation. Some of the recommendations, if adopted, will result in added expenses for the Association. DISCUSSION The Task Force report asserts that "the ANIlK must become more proactive, more collaborative, more focused and more assertive. The ANIl�I provides the only meaningful vehicle for the Cities of the Metropolitan area to express in a unified voice this important perspective of local government". In order to accomplish this goal the Task Force has recommended that an additional staff inember be added at ANIlK. Attached for your review are two sections from the Task Force report addressing "workload and staffing" and "dues". Due to its length, the full report has not been reproduced as part of your packet. Should you wish a copy of the report, please let me know and it will be provided. The staffing section of the report clearly describes the situation presently facing the ANIlK. The Association has been operating with three staff inembers for a number of years, while the number of Legislative policies has increased from 35 to over 100. In addition, the number of Legislative study committees has increased from 2 to 5. Over the years and at the request of inember Cities, the ANIlK has increasingly taken on additional responsibilities which has resulted in it being "spread too thin" in order to effectively undertake its mission. After much deliberation, the 12 member Task Force has recommended that an additional staff inember be added to help relieve this workload. Specific responsibilities for this additional staff inember are enumerated in the attachment. FISCAL IMPACT Our annual dues to ANIlK for 1990 are estimated to be $1, 770. 00. Implementing the major Task Force recommendations, including the addition of a staff person, has a total cost of approximately $38,000 to ANIl�I as a whole. With these additions, it is estimated that our 1991 ANIl�I dues will total no more than $2,200.00. Given the well documented need to add a staff person at AMM, and the relatively minor financial impact on Mendota Heights, it is staff's recommendation that the proposal put forth by ANIlK be accepted. ACTION REQUIRED Should Council concur with the proposal, a motion to that affect would be in order, and staff should be directed to inform ANIl�i of the decision both in writing and at the upcoming ANII�2 membership meeting scheduled for September 20th. MTL:kkb Attachments � �� , as ociation of me�ro olitan munic�alities p July 2, 1990 TO: Thomas Lawell — City Manager RE: 1991 DUES FOR THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES i�) The ANII�i Board, in accordance with the By-Laws, is responsible for establishing the Annual Budget and Work Program and setting the corresponding membership dues rate. The process for 1991 is more complicated due to the impact of the recommendations contained in the final report of the Mission and Membership Services Task Force which you recently received under separate cover. The Board voted at the June 28th Board Meeting to recommend implementation of the major Mission Task Force recommendations. Implementing the major Task Force recommendations, including the additional staff person has a total cost of about $38,000 which would result in a 19� dues increase for member cities over the 1990 dues paid. Consequently, the 1991 ANIlK dues for Mendota Heights based on this decision would be $2,103 and I would ask you to use that amount when preparing your 1991 budget. The Board recognizes that this is a large increase but believes it is essential for several reasons detailed in said report including the following: 1. The r.eed for the � to become more proactive and.visible in helping set-the metropolitan agenda. We need to be 'there' to represent the AN�i member cities adequately at the Council. We need to have a staff person there 12-15 hours.per week. Increased responsibilities at the legislature have made it impossible for our small staff to maintain that kind of commitment. 2. The ANIl�i also needs to increase its presence at the State Legislature. The ANIIK has been 'spread to thin' with the number of policy issues involved and with outstate groups promoting tax policies detrimental to the collective interests of inetropolitan area cities, the ANIl�i staff needs to increase the amount of time it can spend 'one-on-one' promoting ANIlK policy positions. We also need to hold metropolitan legislators more accountable to the ANIl�I agenda. 183 univers'ity avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-4008 3. If the ANIlK is to achieve the status of being recognized as the organization that s eaks and represents the collective interests of inetropolitan area cities, it is important that the association increase its visibility in the eyes of the Legislature, City Officials, the general public and the Metropolitan Council. An enhanced public relations system must be implemented and thi's cannot be done effectively without an additional staff person. A dues increase of such magnitude however, requires membership approval and there will be a special ANIlK Membership Meeting on Thursday evening September 6, 1990 to vote on this matter. (a two/thirds majority of those present and voting is required for approval). It is intended that the new staff person would handle a lot of the enhanced communications and public relations effort thereby 'freeing-up' the Director of Legislative Affairs and the Executive Director for more 'one-on-one� contact at both the metro and state levels. A back-up budget based on a work program and staffing level similar to our 1990 level of activity and effort has also been prepared in case the 19� dues increase is not approved at the membership meeting. The dues for Mendota Heights to support the back-up budget would not exceed $1,847 which represents a 4.5� increase over the 1990 dues. The Board appreciates your continued support of the ANIl�I efforts and strongly endorses the enhanced work program and resultant increase in dues. Do not hesitate to call me or our Executive Director, Vern Peterson should you have questions. We would also encourage you to make plans now to assure that your city has representation at the September 6th. meeting to vote the will of your city. Thank you. Si ly, �r�sident Metropolitan Municipalities -2- J L • 3 WORKLOAD AND STAFFING When originally formed, the AMM had four full-time st.aff inembers. Shortly thereafter, in response to a financial shortf all, the staff was cut to three and has remained at that number since. During that time, the number of legislative policies has increased from 35 to over 100, and the number of legislative study committees from two to five. The Association has taken on other responsibilities including the license and permit survey, and coordination and administration of the Metropolitan Salary Survey. With more time being spent on lobbying of statewide issues and support for committees, there has been a decided time shift away from interaction with the Metropolitan Council and operating agencies. Yet the AMM is the only organiza- tion providing any real oversight of these agencies. For example, we are usually the only cortttnentor on the Metropolitan Council's annual work program and budget. The AMM Membership has come to expect more involvement by the Association, not only in metropolitan issues, but in tax policy, pay equity, tax increment financing, and other areas of statewide concern and involvement. The 1984 Mission and Membership Services Task Force report recommended very strongly that the Board of Directors seek ways to add a staff inember. Yet this is the only one of the 1984 recommendations that has yet to be implemented. To quote that report, "the present staff simply cannot adequately cover all the critical issues, agencies, committees and the legislature." The present Task Force report, if ultimately adopted and implemented by the Board and membership, will only serve to increase the workload significantly. RECOMMENDATrONS 1. The Task Force strongly recommends that the Board of Directors add a staff person. We further recommend that this person have responsibilities in: a. communicating with member cities and maintaining the legislative contact system b. public relations, including media contacts c. staffing some of the standing and ad hoc legislative committees d. some monitoring of Metropolitan Council and agency activities, particularly during the legislative session. 2. With regard to lobbying at the Capitol, the Task Force observes that this effort will fluctuate from time to time. Therefore, it is recommended that increased efforts in this area be handled through use of contract lobbyists. - 14 - DUES The membership dues for the Association are currently set at 46 percent of-a member's dues for the league of Minnesota Cities. Since the League dues are set _ in part on a per capita basis, this works out to AMM dues ranging from a high of 30 cents per capita for Woodland to a low of �4 cents for Minneapolis. The dues for an average sized city of 30,000 population are 55,100, or about 17 cents per capita. Compared to other city lobbying organizations, the AMM is a bargain! For example, the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities charges its members 40 cents per capita, plus from time to time, an additional 20 cents per capita for • "special projects". Dues for the Municipal Legislative Commission are approxi- mately 35 cents per capita, to a maximum of �12,500. , , If the AMM Board of Directors and membership are to implement our recomnendation to add a staff person, a dues increase beyond the rate of inflation is inevi- table. In addition, the cost of developing the computerized property tax model, if determined necessary, will be a considerable initial expense, and require ongoing personnel and data gathering costs. RECOMMENDATION 1. In order to implement the other recommendations in this report, the AMM Board of Directors and membership should be prepared to adopt a dues increase in the range of 20 to 25 percent above the rate of inflation. The Board may wish to look at ways of phasing the dues increase over a two to three year period. 2. The Boa�d and membership should also be prepared to provide financial sup- port for development and maintenance of a property tax modeling system, if the LMC system fails to materialize or is determined inadequate to meet the lobbying needs of the AMM. - 15 - -- • r 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS I`1 ' � August 3, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-29: Midway Sign - Sign Variance DISCUSSION Ms. Laura Stersa, Branch Manager of Dakota County State Bank, appeared before the Planning Commission at its July meeting to request a thirty foot (30') front yard setback variance (see attached memos). RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend that the City Council approve the requested thirty foot (30') front yard setback . variance. ACTION REQUIRED If the Council desires to implement the Planning Commission's recommendation, they should pass a motion approving a thirty foot (30') front yard setback variance for a sign. NOTE: In addition to this individual case, Planner Malloy has pointed out that the Zoning Ordinance needs to be amended to allow pylon signs in a B-1. See Section 18.7(2). Staff will include this amendment with the final zoning code amendment for adoption by Council in the future. JED/KLB:kkb � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 19, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assi t�-� SIIBJECT: CASE NO. 90-29: Midway Sign - Sign Variance - Dakota County Bank DISCII38ION When the City offices were located within the Dakota County Bank building we had a sign along South Plaza Drive. The sign was located with no setbacks right on the property line. After we moved, the Bank removed the sign. Now, the Bank is having trouble with drive up teller traffic using the wrong entrance and then trying to get to the tellers by driving the wrong way at the access point. They would like to remedy this problem by reinstalling a sign at the old City Hall sign location. Limited sight distance makes installing the sign further back a problem and a greater setback would require the removal of a mature tree. . ACTION REOIIIRED Review the requested thirty foot (30' ) front yard sign setback variance with the applicant and make a recommendation to the City Council. JED/KLB:kkb � PLANNING REPORT j DATE: CASE NUMBER: �APPLICANT: ; '� LOCATION: ACTION REOUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 24 July 1990 90-29 Midway Sign Company on behalf of Dakota County Bank 750 South Plaza Drive Variance to 30 foot front yard setback for sign installation 1. The applicant wishes to construct a second freestanding business sign within the 30 foot front yard setback in a B-1 District. The a.pplicant claims that the sign is necessary in order to correct a problem "with vehicular circulation on the property. The problem was created when the applicant moved an existing freestanding sign from its- �revious location, near the westernmost entry drive, to where it currently resides adjacent to the easternmost access drive. This was done to identify the location of the main lobby and cash machine. The west entry is intended to accommodate one-way traffic for the drive�•up teller facility. Without clear signage identifying the drive-up entry, many customers are entering the site at the eastern driveway against the intended flow of traffic. 2. The subject property is located in a B-1 district. The ordinance currently does not permit freestanding or pylon signs in the B-1 or B-lA Districts. Section 18.7(2) permits freestanding or pylon signs in the other business and industrial districts under the conditions outlined in Sections 18.7(2)a through 18.7(2)e. There are several locations in the City where freestanding signs are utilized in B-1 and B-lA Districts. We see no problem with such signs in the Limited Business Districts if they are properly designed and located. Since it would seem that the City is likely to receive more such requests for freestanding signs in the B-1 and B-lA Districts, we recommend that section 18.7(2) be amended to include the B-1 and B-lA Districts. This is not one of the amendments currently being reviewed by the City. The applicant's request could be approved pending the approval of the ordinance amendment. 3. Assuming the ordinance is amended as described request would still require a variance from the Since the sign is proposed to be constructed at original sign, which was on the property line, a would be required. The proposed sign does rn provision in the ordinance. above, the applicant's front yard setback. the location of �tFie variance of 30 feet �t violate any other 0 Midway Sign Company, Case No. 90-29 Page 2 4. The property directly west of the subject site has a row of mature trees that would obstruct the view of the proposed sign from the roadway should it be located further back on the lot. This fact was obviously recognized by the City since the sign identifying the City Hall was located in the very spot where the applicant's sign is proposed when the City offices were located in the building. 5. The impact to the surrounding area is limited by the fact. that the property across the street is currently vacant. While this property is planned for the expansion of the adjacent shopping center, it is very possible that the proposed expansion would front on Dodd Road. The status of the extension of South Plaza Drive to serve development that might occur on the MnDOT property to the east, which is intended to be vacated, is unknown at this time. The City has considered this property for park use in the past. At any rate, it seems likely that South Plaza Drive will remain a dead-end road for some time. 6. One option that may be discussed with the applicant is the possibility of reversing the direction of traffic flow through the property, which would eliminate the need for the additional sign. Obviously, th�"cost of this solution would be greater than the proposed sign, but the option could be explored. 7. The design of the sign itself is acceptable. Base:: on the specific conditions of this site, the applicant's request is reasonable if it can be shown that reversing the direction of traffic flow on the site is an unreasonable solution. . � � � FlAE HAL � � � / � .. s��._ / /// �. ��/ ., ;; �. , r � � SUBJEC' � PROPER � � � NORTH S�ALE: 1 "=200' � � ':��: -- r---. - ''.w: -��:�:�... • • • � • � • � � i • � �, . 3Gj; , • . 0 � %': . . :i � �, �j; • : , . .:::: ...,. , . , �-�. .� � ��. . � . . . :-;,;- ;; � _ ._ ' • , ; ,��%l•%;��, ' • /:' ' "�%/' i/� /!i; , • .•,:�i;,/-.,%j'• . - .; . - . . ,. ;..,•, :; ; . ;%i,. � • ., ,��i, : ;.. .. ' .,: ,-.� .L-'i�'•'"/i. :::�::�:;:;�::�:•• , �.�,.�.•';%fJ�.�. �� . ,%�; ;/ ,�j . ' �� ;.• = i%-;!i: ��i ,rij-'•.: / • -%�/,., � ;;i :i��; ' •. . i '/' .:. ,� / � j�, i � . ;� ;, % ;:, . �� :� .;;':•;, ::� �' ,,, , r/: ;�:::.. ;./�. �. —. � i f , . ' '• :'//. ��`� ,� ; � ii • � � � , . � � �'�:';�; i. • -� • . . � �:_i • � f � . . � . t . � . � -.. . . � ` � o : �. .�;�� , • s� - .. _;'� i : � �- -�-- --. _. � � • t � � � * ; O �. - • ! � . � . -r---� � � ' � i � � _... � � � ' � '� � ! . b ' . ` � • �r � ♦ r ; � ` �' � � � r ' % � . � , \\ � �f t 1 �- � . .�r� � ��\` ] �. � c SUBJECT � PROPERTY � Nt?RTH SGALE: 1 "=100' �.o o :=: ::::•:�:::::::•:•::•:: ;:;:•::�:::::'!� 5f�ra l� y :::�:::::��::::�::�� -ya1.��s :��:�:;�:�:�:::::::::�:: . � :�:: ` :.:::::: :::::. 9 z ,q� �::: �:�':::::��:�:�:�: :��:: p �., � �:: Q40-5�J :`�:�.:;�.:;.;::: zo �; ,- ,� ,� „ .. � �, � 5 g �'4 � 3 = T .. s. �'PE'� K � �1 YL', tacs : �. � Q 9 V � . � t LD � �.t � 4 Q Zo J � � � ? �- lt7.�S' 0 w � � �! r c. 0� � � � ---�.1�.9.c �t �r �' S � a z � 4 SS � v � ! M+ 1��] `�V� \.T�s •� r 't �/ , : � tn j . ; t ) � J � 1VIIC?WAY SIGN �QNIPA�JY, INC. SINCE 1934 ��4 �R�oR Av�NUE ST. PAU L, M! N N. 55104 612/645-9183 Dear Ladies and Gentlem�n: This letter is intended ta explain �he reasons we are requesting a variance to the property set back for a sign £or Dakota County �ta�e bank. First, a li�tle histary af �he �ite. Originally, the City uf Mendc�ta Height� accupied the west end af the Dako�a Caunty Bank Building at .75p Sa. Plaza Drive. To identi�y their entrances, parking, and to direct people to the Police De�artmen� office, they installed a 9' x 7' double si.ded liqhted sign directly adaacent to the groperty 7.ine between the twa driveways. , When the city moved to its new offices, �he bank then acquired the sign and moved it to �he east driveway to identi�y their lobby en�rance and insiant cash machine.' It is now obvious that the bank also needs to direct customers to the dxive-up facility using the west entrance because using the east ent�ance brings them in aga9.nst the traffic flow. We are reques�ing f-rom the Ci�y a variance to install a 4' x 7' lighted sign in the original footings where the . ci�ies sign was located, wi�h the informatian as shown `nn the accompanying drawings. The sign i� allowed by code as it is under 50 square feet, but placing it back 30 feet fron� the property line would require the removal of a rnature tzee. The bank is very aware and sensitive to the need �o have mature �rees in our city. Therefore, we are new sign ad�acent the original Ci�y attached. Res ectfu y, r ichard A. Kru e President requesting �hat we be allowed to pla�e the to �he prgperty Iine, in �he laca�ion of of Mendo�a Height� sign, per �he site plan C ity o� 1Viendota I-Ieights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. Q�- �Q ' Date of Application Fee Paid 1 i�C`�. �C. Applicant Name: Midway Siqn Company PH• 645-9188 (I.ast) (First) _ (Mn Address: 444 PRIOR AVEDTiIE ST PAUL (Number & Street) (City) OwnerName: Dakota County State Bank MN 55104 (State) (Zip) (I.ast) (F"ust) (NII) Address: �5o south Plaza Drive Mendota Heights MN 551?.0 (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) Street Location of Property in Question: South Plaza Drive Legal Description of Property: Type of Request: Rezoning Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Plan Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable Ciry Ordinance Number Present Zoning of Property _ Present Use _ Proposed Zoning of Property : Proposed Use x Variance Sign Subdivision Approval Weflands Permit Other (attach explanadon) Section I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. (Signature of Applicant) �. - I �+�'_�.�� ;!, _l� -� . .- -- 1101 Victoria Cu�ve •1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452-1850 � July li, 1990 �tanley FIa�.mes, DDS . '750 South P1aza Drive Mendota Figts, MN 55120 Dakota County State Bank 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota iigts, MN 55120 Dear Sirs. It i� my understanding that Dakota Caunty State Bank is requestirig permission to install a sign on the DCR Company property located at 750 South Plaza Drive. Although the sign wauld be installed within the 30 faat�variance required by the ci.ty, this does not create a problem for me ar my office. Should you need further infarma�ion� please fee1. free to contact me at 612-454-5999. . Sincerely, � ' ��etJ 5tanle Haimes, DDS. � � i . �: . ... . ._ -;ti � ;' -��,�,��-v N� �v�� - � ' �G� ~ � L� � `�� C- • b �``-� � � . �' !�'�`i � � —.��--�f � �—�e'�J� , �--�>,, � , �, ---.-��f � G1 I �� ,J � O ` � � � .. ��. � � � �� / � `� � `�� _ �• �i � � � �,1 L�.r.� �� y�^ ` ! � I "ti �� .. ��..�Sl.� �� '�r� �:�';� � . i--"��.'` -�-� ; . _ _ -_ ---� --- ,�_� _ . . �/�'� I. \�..��.�� - __.._ _._. ._ _ _.___ � n;��ri�� ^,� �}� � _ l`. � � ��.�:� �:.�o.u8:�� : � .' j'` k�..._. . . . . :�..._ . __. . , . .. . . , K, , r�,�;�,+v I� L�ii � c:��or� ,�s -� �vo -�'-1 I " tn� x. , �-1 � � C� }- �'"C" '�r�c7�E C�c�.Ya6 � bl�., t3r....t7 w �1 H S""� �J�Gi z�t L.- �,J 1.,�"s�"� �'c,� (i 14'TIDJI,J � 'V �" " !✓� ( ^' ' `""^J .. . • � , » ; � �' �` � '•`'`'�,� V� L.�.:- � 1 V� �./�� r: `+.,. . � N i'��"r�, � �.v V►^n I>•1 A rt c: t�.XE�r� � ��G 5 I C-�i� �^�� ra �rc,� �a Tr�o ��1:: C— l.- V i'� E21.G�I 1`T'.� . � JLI�' IJ . � � .��_ `. ..��.-..... . . n ��,• � e Y � � � � ' 7 _ ` . . • ��— II - . � o � �� . a �� o _ � . � _ � � . D L� L �� --- . �- � ----- - � ---�: �i� � �--� �1 j� i— �� r�-`�—� —� 1 i � � , J C� 1( � / C� l s. ;., L� � I� Ka�ru NNA�. T'�t..-� � � l . , ., � �L 1.�. ... � �---� �_n� � ,�--�, _. �..�..5 � �k -N 2� 7 5 � r I�� ^ � 1j'/ ;�1 � L-' � . � U ' � � � �j .I - � �L� �� . �� ,. _.._�_:` `�_ ._. _.____..__� __._._._�.__�__. .. _ ___� __ ..�_. __. �;� _.�::.. ..w __�� , �� v`%r�-�� --�- �Jc�=j — I •l-ACI�`f 1. �ct�s'r-� E��o�+.1 � � e � ,� „ , `'�!�/� �.� � = � �' x � ' tx�� °� ��.� �,�J ��d�.:> INT��:.lCx:� 1LL J 1'"� 1 N��,Y c�)`� � L�;�:.�� N�'�►. G� <j 1 C� btiJ w f�� ' �. I �. �} � � h1 `� L- �L2P�-�i--� � G� - �r� r�i�..�- � r f��. o��Y � �, . :rim , r� �l ��i S t t� c�� '� � r � � , 4� , -. �� ,tks �.i4 a.�' ro' M` to . __ —_.pia��o`T�-- ��r�Ty �� T�--.�.��.� . f. d J 0 C ity o� .�, l l. � r 1Viendota Heights July 20, 1990 Mr. Richard Kruse Midway Sign Company 444 Prior Avenue St. Paul, MN 55104 Dear Mr. Kruse: ' Your application for a 5c ��-�as-k- `jwrt0.��-Q will be considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, `iu�y 2�{ The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, � �.---- Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 � 1850 � C ity o� ....1. � 1Viendota Heights August 3, 1990 Ms. Laura Stersa Branch Manager Dakota County State Bank 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Ms. Stersa: Your application for a 5�4h ��.ck �a.v �avtic�2,will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled � meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, ��s� �"" The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive , Council consideration. The Planning Commission recommended aoa�v�-� �� `` • cr ��I �3 � 1 -tt�o �[' � �� SA.��c�c � va.. i' l c�Y►CA . If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb cc: Mr. Richard Kruse Midway Sign Company 444 Prior Avenue St. Paul, MN 55104 ; 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1VIN • 55118 452 • 1850 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS lul�uC�] August 3, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works D�i�� Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Ass ta SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-23: Hobbs - Side Yard Abutting a Street Variance DISCUSSION Mr. Jerold Hobbs, 1065 Wagon Wheel Trail, attended the July Planning Commission meeting to request a five foot (5') side yard abutting a street variance (please see attached memos). At the meeting, Mr. Hobbs informed the Commission that the exterior of his house will be done in new siding and that the porch addition will match the new siding. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend that the City Council grant the requested five foot (5') side yard abutting a street variance to allow the porch addition. ACTION REQUIRED If the City Council desires to implement the Planning Commission's recommendation, they should pass a motion approving a five foot (5') side yard abutting a street setback variance to allow a porch addition. JED/KLB:kkb 6