1990-12-04CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNE50TA
AGENDA
DECEMBER 4, 1990 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption
4. Approval of the October 16th and November 20th Minutes.
. 5. Consent Calendar
a. Acknowledgment of the November Building Report.
b. Approval of the 1991 Legislative Policies.
c. Acknowledgment of the November 27th Parks and Recreation
Commission Minutes.
d. Approval of the List of Contractors.
End of Consent Calendar
6. Public Comments
7. HEARINGS
a. Heussner Alley Vacation - RESOLIITION NO. 90-81
b. Realignment of the Glenhill Road Trunk Highway 110
Frontage Road Intersection
c. Approval of the 1991 Budget - RESOLIITION NO. 90-82
8. Unfinished and New Business
a. CASE NO. 90-43: Centre Pointe Medical Clinic -
Sign Variance
b. CASE NO. 90-41: Callahan - Wetlands Permit
c. Preliminary Sketches for Mendakota Park Layout
9. Council Comments
10. Adjourn
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 4, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Cauncil
FROM: Tam Lawell, City Administr�� ,
SU&TECT: Add On Agenda far December 4th Council Meeting
Attached, please find the revised agenda for tonight's Council
meeting. A11 items attached are new on the agenda {*).
3. Aaenda Adoption
It is recommendad that Cauncil adapt the revised agenda
printed on pink paper.
4. Addition to Cauncil Minutes of November 20th
The final page af the Navember 20, 1990 Council Minutes was
inadvertently omitted from the original packet. See attached
minute page #�15.
5e. Appraval af List of Claims*
See attached list.
7b, Additional Information- Glenhill Road
See attached material.
7c. Revise Heading for Item 7C and Additional Information
Approval of the 1990 Tax Levy Collectible in 2991 - RESbLUTION
NO. 90-82. See attached letter.
MTL : rmcl
�
. , .
Page No. 2926
October 16, 1990
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, October 16, 1990
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the
City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers
Blesener, Cummins and Hartmann. Councilmember Anderson had informed
the Council that he would be out of town.
AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of the
revised agenda for the meeting.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays : 0
CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of the
consent calendar for the meeting along with
authorization for execution of any necessary
documents contained therein.
a. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the
October 9th Parks and Recreation
Commission meeting.
b. Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's monthly
report for September.
c. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-75, "A
RESOLUTION REVISING RESOLUTION NO. 90-70
SEEKING FUNDING FROM DAKOTA COUNTY FOR
CONTINUATION OF COMMUNITY LANDFILL
ABATEMENT PROGRAM."
d. Approval of a modified critical area site
plan for Monty Girard Homes to allow
construction of a home on Lot 8, Block 2,
Val's Addition, along with waiver of the
application fee.
e. Approval of the list of contractor
licenses.
f. Approval of the List of Claims dated
October 16, 1990 and totalling
$335,686.12.
Page No. 2927
October 16, 1990
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
PUBLIC COMMENTS Council acknowledged a letter from five
condominium/townhouse associations regarding
traffic noise generated by I-35E between T.H.
110 and T.H. 13. Council also acknowledged an
associated memo from the City Administrator.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
RED RIBBON WEEK
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Mr. Bud Sweet
residents of
Association,
Association,
Association,
Association,
Association.
audience the
Associations'
reviewed the concerns of the
the Eagle Point Condominium
Eagle Ridge Townhouse
Victoria Highlands Townhome
Ridge South Condominium
and Victoria Townhomes
He reviewed for the Council and
three proposals set forth in the
letter.
Mayor Mertensotto gave a background on I-35E
development and prior Council action related
to noise. He informed the audience that the
state contemplates replacing the T.H. 13
bridge at I-35E and that it may be an
opportune time to re-raise the noise issue.
He pointed out that the request should be made
to Mn/DOT and suggested that the City should
join in the request along with the
Associations, and that City staff should work
with Mr. Sweet etal on the matter.
Councilmember Hartmann moved to direct staff
to prepare any necessary resolutions and
letters in support of the Associations'
request.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Mayor Mertensotto read a proclamation naming
the week of October 20-28, 1990 as Red Ribbon
Week.
Councilmember Blesener moved approval of "A
RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 20-
28, 1990 AS RED RIBBON WEEK ENCOURAGING
CITIZENS TO COMMIT TO THE REDUCTION AND
PREVENTION OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE."
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Page No. 2928
October 16, 1990
HYDRANT CONVERSION Council acknowledged a report from the Public
Works Director regarding bids received for the
conversion of 20 hydrants in Friendly Hills
and 10 hydrants in the Cherry Hills
neighborhood to the City's standard hydrants.
After brief discussion, Councilmember Cummins
moved to authorize staff to award a purchase
order to Davies Water Equipment Company for
the conversion of 30 hydrants for their low
bid of $11,982.63.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
CHRISTMAS TREE SALES Council acknowledged a report from
Administrative Assistant Batchelder regarding
a request from Mr. Brian Birch for permission
to sell Christmas trees on his lot on Freeway
Road, the proceeds to be used for charitable
purposes. Council also acknowledged a letter
from Dr. Tom Koepke expressing his opposition
to the request on the basis of access, safety,
traffic and lack of lighting.
Mr. Brian Birch, present for the discussion,
informed Council that it is his intent to use
the proceeds from tree sales to support a
Jamaican charity, the "Windsor Grove Homes."
Mr. Birch showed slides of the existing very
poor condition of the housing units which
serve to house 40 students of a girls' school.
Mayor Mertensotto reviewed Mr. Batchelder's
report and pointed out that during the
development of the Zoning Ordinance, open
sales lots were considered and rejected as a
land use. He informed Mr. Birch that the
Council is very much supportive of his cause
but that approving the request would set a
precedent that would cause future problems.
He pointed out that a tree sale request from
Tom Thumb in the past was denied.
Mr. Birch stated that he will sell Christmas
trees from the property regardless of whether
the City approves the request or not. He
further stated that many of the points raised
by Dr. Koepke in his letter are false.
Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins and Hartmann
supported the Mayor's position, although all
mentioned the overall merits of the charity.
Page No. 2929
October 16, 1990
Councilmember Hartmann expressed concern over
access to the site, and Mayor Mertensotto
stated that the best interest of the City must
prevail.
Councilmember Hartmann moved to deny Mr.
Birch's request to allow Christmas tree sales
from his lot on Freeway Road.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
G.M.H. CONTRACT Council acknowledged a letter from Mr. Gary
Harms, of G.M.H. Asphalt Corporation, for an
� extension of its park construction contracts.
Council also acknowledged a report from Public
Works Director Danielson in response to the
request. Mayor Mertensotto reviewed the
history of the G.M.H. work and contract
extension requests.
Mr. Dwight Rabuse, legal counsel for G.M.H.,
stated that he has only been associated with
Mr. Harms since this afternoon but that he
felt adequately prepared to address the issue.
He stated that the summer was extremely wet
and that while Mr. Harms was prudent to allow
for rain days when he bid the projects,
rainfall was extraordinary. He observed that
cities levy liquidated damages generally
because of poor workmanship but that the City
has been happy with the results in this case.
He also pointed out that perched water at the
Sibley site was an unknown.
Mr. Harms stated that it rained 17 days during
the month of June and that he lost 55 days due
to rain. It was noted that the City
inspection records reveal that there were only
13 days of delay caused by rain, including
days after rainfall when the ground might have
been too wet to work.
It was noted that staff's calculation of
liquidated damages, at $200 per day in
accordance with the contracts, is $18,400.
It was further pointed out that the City holds
retainage of 5� of the amount of each of the
contracts (total of all contracts is
$�50,000).
City Attorney Hart stated that he does not
know to what extent work has been accepted and
approved, but the key is having leverage over
Page No. 2930
October 16, 1990
the contractor to performance standards under
the contract. The City can impose penalties
now and still require retainage. The question
is what extent of work needs to be completed.
Mr. Harms stated that if all three of the
contracts were considered together, the work
is about 95% completed. Mr. Rabanus pointed
out that the City holds retainage on the
contracts, 5% of the amount of each of the
contracts, which is much greater than the
liquidated damages. He stated that Mr. Harms
is trying to get the work done as quickly as
possible and must pay his people. He further
stated that Mr. Harms has a problem keeping
his people working if he doesn't get paid.
Councilmember Cummins stated that he is in
favor of keeping pressure on the contractor to
make sure the contracts get completed. He
felt that the City has sufficient retainage to
cover liquidated damages and potential re-
seeding, etc., and stated that he did not want
to put GMH into financial distress.
Councilmember Blesener pointed out that the
staff has a punch list for the parks and
trails, and that if the items are minor she
would be agreeable to releasing liquidated
damages and reserving the right to dip into
the retainage to cover the uncompleted items.
Administrator Lawell stated that he feels the
biggest question is the subject of the seed
that has been put down. The optimum planting
time was missed by quite a bit, and he felt
the City needs leverage to insure performance
of the seed. He felt the City should look
carefully at reducing the retainage percentage
because of the uncertainty of the seeding.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the issue
before Council is the waiver of damages -
whether the Council wants to waive the
liquidated damage claim.
Mr. Rabanus agreed, stating that if the City
releases the $15,000 currently being held the
City still would have thousands of dollars in
retainage as a lever. He stated that he is
before Council to ask for an extension of the
working days in the contracts to move the
subject off of liquidated damages because he
believes there is cause for extension.
J
Page No. 2931
October 16, 1990
Mayor Mertensotto responded that Mr. Harms
asks for an extension of the contract so that
he will not be penalized for going beyond the
completion dates.
Mr. Rabanus responded that liquidated damages
under the City's contract are appropriate if
the contractor missed the completion dates and
the City or unforeseen conditions did not play
a role. Mr. Harms reviewed eight items
contained in his letter dated October 8th.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the staff
memo addresses each of the 8 items and that
staff recommends liquidated damages.
Councilmember Cummins stated that the issue of
add-ons must be negotiated once the contract
is completed. He further stated that while he
is not suggesting that the City give up
liquidated damages, if two of the contracts
are substantially completed and the City is
holding retainage he did not see the need to
withhold liquidated damages as well. He
stated that he would be comfortable with
returning a portion of the $15,000
withholding.
Mr. Rabanus stated that if Council votes
favorably this evening and grants an
extension, it could do so conditionally and
seek liquidated damages later if necessary.
Mayor Mertensotto felt that staff should make
a recommendation on what dollar amount is
adequate.
Councilmember Blesener agreed with
Councilmember Cummins suggestion. She stated
that the City also has outstanding obligations
for the change orders in addition to the 5%
retainage to cover future liquidated damages
and future completion of the work.
After discussion, Councilmember Cummins moved,
that $10,000 of the $15,000 retainage be paid
to GMH, recognizing that the City retains its
right to liquidated damages of $18,000 on the
three contracts with GMH together with the
fact that the City has outstanding change
order obligations.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Page No. 2932
October 16, 1990
Council pointed out that it is not
jeopardizing the City's position with respect
to liquidated damages by taking the foregoing
action. It was further pointed out that after
the contracts are completed, including the
punch lists, and after it can be determined
that the fields will be playable in the
spring, staff will then be in a position to
make a recommendation on liquidated damages.
CASE NO. 90-38, LEISER Mr. Bill Strub and representatives of Center
(STRUB) for Diagnostic Imaging and its land developer
and designer were present to request approval
. of a minor conditional use permit amendment
for the Riverwood Place�P.U.D., located on
T.H. 13 east of I-35E.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that portions of
the proposed development will encroach on
other lots within the PUD. He asked whether
it would be acceptable to the applicants if
Council permits a re-plat so that the use
could be situated on its own lot. All of the
representatives agreed that they would be
agreeable to replatting.
Responding to a question from Mayor
Mertensotto regarding provisions for radiation
safety, the representative of the Center for
Magnetic Imaging stated that there are three
processes which will be housed in the
facility. Those processes are MRI, which is a
combination of magnetic fields and radio
waves, and an area outside the building has
been fenced so that anyone wearing a pace-
maker would not be affected by the magnetic
field. The other processes are CAT scanning
and standard x-ray equipment. He stated that
there is really no radiation or any potential
damage to the environment.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that Council's
concern is that the applicants comply with any
applicable federal or state regulations and
all code requirements. Mr. Leiser responded
that the applicant will comply with all state
and federal regulations and that they are
willing to apply for replatting.
Mr. Strub stated that time is of the essence,
and if replatting is required before a permit
can be issued, the frost season will occur
before construction can begin. He stated that
Page No. 2933
October 16, 1990
he will guarantee to Council that he will
undertake replatting.
Councilmember Blesener asked if there can be a
more centrally located driveway rather than
through the center of the site. Mr. Strub
responded that Mn/DOT dictated the location -
the curb-cut was already made by Mn/DOT.
With respect to circulation and traffic flow,
Mr. Leiser stated that the site plan was
modified after discussion with the City
Planner - the plan before Council responds to
the Planner's report.
Councilmember Cummins asked how the lot which
is closest to the existing building is
accessed. Mr. Strub responded that the .
existing building is a condominium - the
original intent was a shared traffic pattern,
and the serpentine road will not change.
Mr. Leiser informed Council that parking
closest to the building will reserved for
patients and that staff will park to the west,
and that the parking plan was suggested by the
City Planner.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he would like
the exterior to be more compatible with the
existing building. Mr. Leiser responded that
the building will be adjusted to blend in.
The portico is symbolic, and the applicants
are trying to set a warm friendly entry into
the building. He stated that the applicants
have attempted to use brick and stucco, and
will reverse the color scheme and use exactly
the same color orientation used on the Strub
building (light brick and dark roof).
Responding to a question from Councilmember
Blesener as to why the applicants do not use
the same material as used on the existing
building, Mr. Strub stated that he is very
concerned about what will be going on the
site. He further stated that he is concerned
about the landscaping on T.H. 13 and the color
scheme and that it must be homogeneous with
the existing building, and unless this is the
case, he will not sign a contract.
Councilmember Blesener requested that the
applicants use the same materials as the Strub
building, not the same facade. Mr. Leiser
Page No. 2934
October 16, 1990
responded that he will take the plan back to
the architects.
Councilmember Blesener moved to authorize
staff to issue a foundation permit for the
Center for Diagnostic Imaging subject to
agreement that the applicants will apply for
replatting, and conditioned upon Council
review and approval of the design plans and
exterior materials at the November 6th
meeting.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
PARK BOND SALE The Council received and reviewed a tabulation
of bids received for the sale of $1,730,000 in
park bonds authorized in the 1989 referendum.
Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of
Resolution No. 90-76, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
BID ON BONDS OF 1990, PROVIDING FOR THEIR
ISSUANCE AND LEVYING A TAX FOR THE PAYMENT
THEREOF," awarding the bid to Norwest
Investment Services for their low bid of
$1,610,172.08.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
HUMANE SOCIETY " Council acknowledged and discussed a letter
from the Minnesota Valley Humane Society
requesting financial assistance to establish
an animal shelter in Dakota County, along with
an associated report from the City
Administrator. Council also acknowledged a
letter from Dr. Tom Koepke. Mr. Dean Weigel,
from the Minnesota Valley Humane Society was
present for the discussion.
Mr. Weigel informed Council that the Society
is requesting a one-time contribution of $0.50
per capita. Administrator Lawell informed
Council that state statute allows a per capita
pledge and requires that the population base
be the 1980 census (the most recent federal
census): the cost to the City would be $3,644.
If the 1990 preliminary census receives
approval in the near future the maximum
contribution would increase to $4,692.50.
Mr. Weigel stated that his organization plans
on using the donations from communities as a
down payment for a site and that it is leaning
Page No. 2935
October 16, 1990
towards a site in Burnsville. Currently, the
cities of Burnsville, Apple Valley and Eagan
have agreed to contribute, and Dakota County
has appropriated $10,000. He stated that
Burnsville's conditions were that there be a
firm commitment on the site and a purchase
agreement.
Responding to a question from Mayor
Mertensotto, Mr. Weigel stated that he would
certify that no portion of the contribution
would be for salaries for the officers of the
organization. He stated that he is asking for
confirmation that an appropriation will be
authorized, and will be available when the
Society is ready to purchase a building. He
further stated that the Society will comply
with all conditions the Council sets.
Councilmember
one-time apprc
Minnesota Vall
final plans fc
of a facility,
Society moves
purchase.
Councilmember
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Blesener moved to commit to a
priation of $4,000 to the
ey Humane Society, subject to
r the purchase and construction
no payment to be made until the
ahead with its building
Cummins seconded the motion.
EAGLE RIDGE SOUTH Council acknowledged a report from the City
FIRE PROTECTION Administrator relative to resolution of the
fire protection orders issued to Eagle Ridge
South condominiums. Council also acknowledged
a letter from Rollin Crawford, legal counsel
for the condominium association, regarding
liability exposure and terms of the resolution
of the appeal to the Fire Marshal's orders.
Councilmember Hartmann moved to affirm the
Fire Marshal order number 10 and grant a
variance to Fire Marshal order number 3
subject to the installation of self-closing
devices on the party room and exercise room
corridor doors.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD Council acknowledged and briefly discussed a
IMPROVEMENTS feasibility report on a proposed MSA project
for Mendota Heights Road street upgrading,
trail and utility construction.
� r
Page No. 2936
October 16, 1990
Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of
Resolution No. 90-77, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
ENGINEER'S REPORT AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER
AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE THE
PROPERTIES ABUTTING MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD
(BETWEEN LEXINGTON AVE. AND T.H. 149,
IMPROVEMENT NO. 90, PROJECT NO. 3)," the
hearing to be held on November 20th.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
FIRE RESCUE TRUCK Council acknowledged specifications prepared
by the Fire Department truck design committee
for a proposed fire department command/rescue
vehicle. Fire Chief Maczko and committee
members were present to answer Council
questions.
Chief Maczko stated that cost estimates for
the vehicle range from $90,000 to $120,000.
With respect to a question from Councilmember
Blesener regarding alternates, he stated that
the only alternate would be how the exterior
compartments are constructed.
Mayor Mertensotto asked whether it would be
wise to put a few alternates in the
specification in case the bids come in much
over budget. Chief Maczko responded that the
committee established department needs and
decided to go "bare-bones" so that they could
get the engine size and other things that are
necessary. He estimated that the existing
rescue truck can be sold for $8,000 to
$12,000. He felt that the proposed vehicle
should have a useful life of 20 to 25 years.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the City should
set up a reserve, dedicated fund for future
purchases instead of relying on equipment
certificates. Treasurer Shaughnessy responded
that three years ago Council decided to limit
the use of equipment certificates to only
substantial purchases and that the proposed
vehicle was included in as an equipment
certificate expenditure in the 1990 budget.
He stated that he would like to reserve the
opportunity to use equipment certificates in
the future because of uncertainty over what
the legislature might do with levy limits in
future years.
Page No. 2937
October 16, 1990
Fire Chief Maczko informed Council that the
department is currently going through a needs ^
assessment to determine future needs.
Councilmember Blesener moved to approve the
specifications as written and to authorize
advertisement for bids to be received on
November 16th.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
COUNCIL WORKSHOP Councilmember Cummins moved that Council
conduct a workshop on October 30th at 7:30
P.M. for discussion of the city's comparable
worth system and labor negotiations.
� Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Council directed that the letter from Dr.
Koepke be referred to the Police Chief for
review and report to the Council.
COUNCIL COMMENTS Mayor Mertensotto asked that the Public Works
Department fill a hole in the pavement about
75 feet from the intersection of Keokuk and
Pueblo.
ADJOURN There being no further business to come before
the Council, Councilmember Hartmann moved that
the meeting be adjourned.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:17 o'Clock P.M.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
�
�� �
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, November 20, 1990
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the
City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock
P.M. at City Hall, 1001 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:32 o'clock P.M.
The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto,
Councilmembers Cummins, Blesener, Anderson and Hartmann.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of the revised
agenda for the meeting.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
APPROVAL OF
MINUTES
Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of the
October 2nd regular meeting minutes.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the
motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Councilmember Blesener moved approval of the
November 7th Election Canvassing Board meeting
minutes.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the
November 6th regular meeting minutes.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
CONSENT CALENDAR
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
PROCLAMATION
November 20, 1990
Page 2
Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of the
consent calendar for the meeting along with
authorization for execution of any necessary
documents contained therein.
a. Acknowledgment of the October 23rd Planning
Commission Minutes.
b. Acknowledgment of the October Treasurer's
Report.
c. Acknowledgment of the November 13th Parks and
Recreation Commission Minutes.
d. Acknowledgment of a Letter of Resignation from
Planning Commission Chair Jerry Morson to be
effective at the end of his term, January 1991.
e. Authorization of staff to issue a purchase
order in the amount of $6,6000 to Carlson Sewer
for improvement of the Dodd Road/Trunk Highway
110 bike trail.
f. Approval of the List of Contractor licenses
dated November 20, 1990 and attached hereto.
g. Approval of the List of Claims dated November
20, 1990 and totalling $414,347.
Councilmember Anderson noted that Planning
Commission Chair Jerry Morson has served on the
Planning Commission for many years with great
distinction. He further stated that it is with
great regret that the Council is accepting his
resignation as Jerry is a fine individual who has
contributed greatly to the community.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Mayor Mertensotto recommended that the City Council
proclaim November 27, 1990 as Mendota Elementary
Day in recognition of the Minnesota Elementary
School Principal's Association awarding Mendota
Elementary School with the Elementary School of
Excellence Award. Mayor Mertensotto read the
proclamation.
November 20, 1990
Page 3
Ms. Donna Montgomery, Principal of Mendota
Elementary School and Ms. Kaplan, representative of
the Parent's Association, were both present for the
Proclamation. Ms. Montgomery briefly explained how
Mendota Elementary applied for this prestigious
award. She further explained that 'Mendota
Elementary was one of only four schools honored
statewide. Ms. Montgomery further stated that the
City Council is invited to attend the award
presentation at Frances M.�Grass Junior High School
on Tuesday, November 27th at 7:00 o'clock P.M.
Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of the
Proclamation on designating November 27, 1990 as
Mendota Elementary School Day.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
HEARING:
NOACK ALLEY VACATION
Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the
purpose of a public hearing on an application
from Mr. and Mrs. Leroy Noack for the vacation
of an alley in Lot 7, T.T. Smith's Subdivision
No. 4.
Mr. Noack was present for the discussion.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the City
currently has no use for the alley other than
as a utility easement for Northern States
Power.
There being no questions or comments,
Councilmember Blesener moved that the hearing
be closed.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of
Resolution No. 90-80, "RESOLUTION APPROVING
� VACATION OF AN ALLEY."
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
FIRE DEPARTMENT
RATING STUDY
November 20, 1990
Page 4
Mayor Mertensotto briefly exp�ained that the
Fire Department is requesting to hire a
consultant to study whether or not the City's
fire class rating can be adjusted. Mayor
Mertensotto explained that presently the City
is at a rating of six and that this rating
really only affects commercial property
insurance premiums. Mayor Mertensotto further
explained that the City can undergo the rating
without a consultant involved.
Administrator Lawell explained that about
every fifteen years the rating takes place and
that the City is about due for another rating.
He explained that the suggested consultant was
previously employed by the Insurance Service
Organization and that the Fire Department
feels it might be helpful to use this
consultant. Administrator Lawell explained
the rating procedure.
Councilmember Blesener directed the Fire
Department to send a letter to the commercial
businesses asking them if they are interested
in contributing to the fire ratings study.
Councilmember Blesener stated that it is the
businesses that will get the direct benefit
from an adjustment. r`
Administrator Lawell briefly explained the
ratings of neighboring cities. Administrator
Lawell stated the City should not pass on the
opportunity for a new fire rating. He stated
that the City has a good fire department and a
good water system and that the City should try
and come up with an adjustment from a six to
possibly a four.
Councilmember Cummins further stated that
staff should contact the Chamber of Commerce
to see if they can solicit support from their
members.
REALIGNMENT OF THE
GLENHILL ROAD/TRUNK
HIGHWAY 110 FRONTAGE ROAD
INTERSECTION
Mayor Mertensotto briefly reviewed the
memorandum submitted by Engineer Klayton
Eckles regarding the realignment of Glenhill
Road where it connects to the Frontage Road
(Victoria Curve).
November 20. 1990
Page S
Engineer Eckles (using maps) explained that
MnDOT's original plan was to maintain the
Glenhill Road connection when the frontage
Road is extended further west. He stated that
to do this, would have a significant adverse
impact on the house near the intersection
(1219 Victoria Curve). He explained that
MnDOT has developed an alternative design to
eliminate the impact. He explained that MnDOT
has proposed to construct a cul-de-sac on
Glenhill Road which would completely eliminate
the connection to the Frontage Road. He
further stated that the connection as
originally proposed would require a sharp "S'�
curve design to make the connection. He
stated that to construct the "S" curve would
require that the entire front yard of 1219
Victoria Curve be disrupted. Engineer Eckles
stated that he has talked to Mr. Shaughnessy,
owner of 1219 Victoria, and that Mr.
Shaughnessy has expressed great concern with
the "S" curve design. Engineer Eckles
explained that Mr. Libby, of MnDOT, has
informed the City that the impact to 1219
Victoria could be severe in the form of severe
slope requirements. He further explained that
the State does not like this type of "S"
curves due to certain safety concerns. He
further explained that the favorable
alternative would be to turn Glenhill Road
into a cul-de-sac street and provide access to
the entire neighborhood off of Hunter Lane.
Engineer Eckles stated the residents in the
immediate area, in general, have commented
positively in favor of the cul-de-sac
alternative. He explained that the residents �`��Q�
on Glenhill Road were all notified of th o �
alternatives. He stated that the Ci id not
notify the entire neighborhood. uncilmember
Blesener'stated that the Lane residents
are the most impacted with all of the traffic
the new design will create. Mayor Mertensotto
concurred with Councilmember Blesener that all
residents in the area should be notified.
Mr. Irv Vick, owner of a vacant lot north of
1219 Victoria, questioned if there will be
access, in the future, towards Mendota. Mayor
Mertensotto explained that there would be and
that it will be the principal access from
Highway 110 heading down towards Mendota once
the interchange is completed. Mr. Vick
e�ressed a concern of a long traveling
November 20, 1990
Page 6
distance with the new frontage road down to
Mendota. He further explained his concern for
emergency vehicle access. Mr. Vick stated
that he feels the "S" curve design is more
logical. Mr. Vick, brother of Mr. Irv Vick,
was also present as he owns a vacant lot north
of his brother's lot. He further explained
that he and his brother own a one acre parcel
of land east of their lots.
Engineer Eckles stated that he had talked to
Mr. Linsmayer, Mr. Culligan and Mr. Chaffen,
all property owners in the area, and they all
stated that they prefer the cul-de-sac option.
Ms. Jane McCabe, 1949 Glenhill Road, stated
that she prefers the cul-de-sac option. She
stated that the current slope is not very
safe.
Mr. Larry Culligan, 1941 Glenhill Road, stated
that he has talked to several of his neighbors
and that they are all in favor of the cul-de-
sac option. He stated that the cul-de-sac
option would cut down on the speeding in the
area.
Mayor Mertensotto directed staff to send
notice of the two alternative proposals to all
residents of the Glenhill Road area, and that
staff is directed to return back to the
Council on December 4, 1990.
HEARING:
MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD
FEASIBILITY
Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the
purpose of a public hearing on proposed
sanitary sewers, water, storm sewers and
street construction to serve properties along
Mendota Heights Road (between T.H. 149 and
Lexington Avenue). Council acknowledged the
feasibility report.
Engineer Klayton Eckles explained that the
proposed project involves the upgrade of
Mendota Heights from Dodd Road to I-35E and
that it would also involve the widening of
Mendota Heights Road between Visitation Drive
and I-35E. He further explained that a
watermain would be installed along the entire
length of Mendota Heights Road which would
complete a major link in the City trunk line
November 20, 1990
Page 7
watermain from Dodd Road to the watertower.
He further explained that a pedestrian trail
would be constructed from Dodd Road to I-35E
and extend the trail, which is between
Lexington Avenue and Highway 55, through the
industrial park. Engineer Eckles further
explained that the City has the option of
installing sanitary sewer to serve the parcel
of land owned by Mr. Tousignant and also
install storm sewer along the entire length of
the street. He further stated the City could
also include City street lights. He explained
that the State Aid Program will pay for street
lights at intersections. He explained that
there is a lot of traffic from the schools in
the area it might be prudent to install street
lights at Visitation Drive, Lake Drive and
possibly IOS. Mayor Mertensotto acknowledged
that the area is dark and rather isolated and
that lighting would certainly add the security
and useability of the pedestrian ways.
Mayor Mertensotto acknowledged that Mr. Bob
Tougsinant is in the audience and that he is
directly involved with the project. He
explained that the City is recommending at
this time that sanitary sewer service not be
installed to serve Mr. Tousignant's land
directly to the south and west of Mendota
Heights Road. Engineer Eckles explained that
at this point in time, there is no urgency in
installing the sanitary sewer service. He
explained that if Mr. Tousignant is interested
in sanitary sewer service he should petition
the City and the City would install the
service. Mr. Tousignant stated that at this
point in time, he is not interested in having
the sanitary sewer service installed to serve
his land.
Mayor Mertensotto formally acknowledged a
letter as submitted by Visitation Convent as
presented on the add on agenda.
There was a brief discussion regarding the
funding of the bike trail. It was pointed out
that the bike trail is funded by the park bond
referendum.
Mr. Tousignant questioned why, five years ago,
his property was assessed $40,000 for sanitary
sewer service and St. Thomas was not.
Engineer Klayton Eckles explained that the
assessment was a front ditch assessment for
November 20, 1990
Page 8
sanitary sewer and that St. Thomas Academy was
not assessed. Mr. Tousignant stated that he
does not think that that was appropriate.
Engineer Eckles explained that St. Thomas
Academy has paid for significant amounts of
sanitary sewer. He explained that there is
sanitary sewer service along the north side of
their property (Lake Drive).
City Treasurer Shaughnessy explained that St.
Thomas Academy's assessments for both water
and sanitary sewer were made on the Lake Drive
side when the City developed the Mendota
Heights Road sewer. He e�cplained that St.
Thomas is all one parcel of land and that the
parcel had been served. He explained that the
City computed an equivalent assessment and
reduced the other assessments on Mendota
Heights Road by that amount. He stated that
if the property is ever used for another
purpose there would be a hook up charge (sewer
service from Mendota Heights Road).
Engineer Eckles briefly explained that the
proposal for water assessments would be that
anyone that can be assessed would be assessed
at the same rate as IOS was assessed (City
wide average rate). He explained that this
amount would not cover the cost of the sixteen
inch water main line. He further explained
that the City would use water revenue funds to
pick up the difference. Engineer Eckles
explained that State Aid would pick up a large
portion of street funding.
Mr. John Grieving, Head Master of St. Thomas
Academy, questioned why St. Thomas Academy was
left out of the water assessment calculations.
Engineer Eckles explained that a watermain was
extended in front of the school down Lake
Drive and deadended four hundred feet shy of
Mendota Heights Road.� He explained that the
City is now contemplating making that
connection. He explained that that would be
frontage on St. Thomas and it would benefit
St. Thomas in improving their fire fighting
capabilities and finish up the frontage on
their property which had not been assessed for
water.
Mr. Grieving questioned if there will be a
signal light installed at the intersection of
Dodd Road and Mendota Heights Road. Public
Works Director Jim Danielson explained that
November 20, 1990
Page 9
that particular intersection is not within
Mendota Heights jurisdiction. He explained
that the City has petitioned MnDOT on several
occasions for signal lights. He explained
that certain warrants have to be met before
signal lights are installed.
In response to a question from Mr. Grieving,
Public Works Director Danielson stated that
the City could petition the State for
installation of signal lights. Mayor
Mertensotto stated that the City should
petition the State in conjunction with the
proj ect .
Mr. Jim Tschaan, Head Master of the Convent of
Visitation, questioned when the assessment
hearing will take place. Mayor Mertensotto
estimated that the hearing may be in 1992.
Mr. Tschaan questioned if the sole benefit
that Visitation derives from the water
assessment is the safety factor. Engineer
Eckles explained (using maps) that the south
portion of Visitation's land is being assessed
for water. He e�lained that all of the land
owner by Visitation south of Mendota Heights
Road has never received any water and when it
eventually develops it will need a watermain.
He explained that there is nothing proposed to
assess any land on the north side. Mayor
Mertensotto explained that this assessment has
nothing to do with the fire prevention. Mayor
Mertensotto stated that that was specifically
addressing St. Thomas Academy in regards to
the assessments for looping the watermain on
Lake Drive. Engineer Eckles explained that
streets will be assessed on both sides of the
street. Mr. Tschaan stated that Visitation
has no immediate development plans.
Mr. Ultan Duggan recommended that the City
petition MnDOT for traffic signals at the
intersection of Dodd Road and Mendota Heights
Road. He further asked if the construction
could be completed before school starts for
the new year. Mayor Mertensotto stated that
the City would do its best in supporting the
request.
Councilmember Cummins moved to close the
public hearing.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
November 20, 1990
Page 10
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of
Resolution No. 90-81, "RESOLUTION ORDERING
IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
SPECIFICATION5 FOR SANITARY SEWERS, WATER,
STORM SEWERS AND STREET CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE
PROPERTIES ALONG MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD (BETWEEN
T.H. 149 AND LEXINGTON AVENUE, IMPROVEMENT NO.
90, PROJECT NO. 3).
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
HEARING:
CASE NO. 90-42:
THEATERS WITHIN A B-4
ZONING AMENDMENT
Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the
purpose of a public hearing to consider an
amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow
movie theaters within the B-4 Shopping Center
as a permitted use. Mayor Mertensotto briefly
explained that the City only has one B-4
Shopping District.
Mr. Edward Paster, Paster Enterprises - owner
of the Mendota Mall, was present along with
Mr. John Street, Construction Manager of
Paster Enterprises and Mr. Larry Kirschenman,
Vice President of MIDCO. Mr. Paster explained
that MIDCO is proposing to construct a family
type theater within the Mendota Mall. He
explained that MIDCO's reputation is very
respectful and that they respect Paster
Enterprises sensitivities with regards to the
use of the Mall. Mr. Paster further stated
that a concern at the Planning Commission
level was that there will not be a video
arcade next to the theaters. He stated that
they are contemplating installing 2 or 3 video
games in the lobby for people to use who are
buying tickets to see a movie only.
Mr. Larry Kirschenman, Vice President of
MIDCO, briefly explained that MIDCO is
presently running movie theaters within three
states. He explained that there will be
roughly 1,200 seats and that the operation
will be open seven days a week. He stated
November 20, 1990
Page 11
that the movies shown will be "second run"
movies and the admission price will be a
discount price. He further explained that
they are unsure at this time if they will be
running movies with an NC-17 movie rating.
Councilmember Anderson pointed out that once
the theater amendment is made, the City
Council is not going to be in a position to
issue any prior restraints on movies that the
theater shows according to the First
Amendment. Councilmember Anderson stated that
he is concerned with the inadequate amount of
parking, the inadequacy of ingress and egress
cuts for traffic, no control over the type of
movies. He stated that he doesn't see a great
demand in the community for second run,
discount movie theater. He stated that he was
surprised to see that the Planning Commission
was so enthused about this request with the
concern for quality that we have in this
community .
Mr. Paster stated that he shares the same
concerns for quality within the community. He
stated that there is a lease agreement and
that this agreement stipulates that the movie
theater will be a family type theater
specifically prohibiting the showing of any
pornographic movies. He explained that the
parking will be adequately handled. He stated
that they may open up the additional land that
they own to help ease any parking problems.
He explained that Paster Enterprises has been
very aggressive in trying to rent the shopping
center for the past three years. He explained
that they are trying to meet the needs of the
community.
Mayor Mertensotto acknowledged the fact that
it may be a difficult situation with the
access out of Plaza Drive on to Dodd Road.
Councilmember Anderson stated that the City
may be going a little overboard to facilitate
economic success on the part of the developer.
He further stated that there are two movie
theaters in West St. Paul. He also stated
that both theaters in West St. Paul have
plenty of ingress and egress cuts. He stated
that the traffic situation at the Mendota Mall
is already a bad situation and that the
proposed theater will only compound the
situation. He stated that the City Council
November 20, 1990
Page 12
should be responsible in amending the Zoning
Ordinance.
There was no one present in the audience to
discuss this request.
Councilmember Cummins questioned if there will
be further variances needed to install
additional signage. Mr. Paster stated that
there are already signs installed within the
shopping center. He further explained that he
is unsure if the proposed clock tower will be
constructed.
Mayor Mertensotto expressed his concerns for
emergency exits. Mr. Streeter stated the
parking questions, emergency exits,
sprinklers, etc. will all be met according to
State Code requirements. He further stated
that all required plans will submitted to the
City Building Department.
Councilmember Blesener stated that she feels
the theater is an appropriate use within the
shopping district. She stated that this movie
theater targets the family. She further
stated that the traffic will be staggered and
that she doesn't feel that traffic will be a
problem.
Councilmember Blesener moved to close the
public hearing.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of
Ordinance No. 272, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 401."
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 1, ANDERSON
HEARING:
CASE NO. 90-36:
I�INVILL - ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT - CHURCHES IN THE
INDUSTRIAL PARK
Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the
purpose of a public hearing for an Ordinance
November 20, 1990
Page 13
Amendment to allow churches within the
Industrial (I) Zoning District as a
Conditional Use.
Mr. Ralph Linvill, owner of Dakota Business
Plaza located at 2401 Pilot Knob Road,
explained that he has leased space in his
plaza to a church. He explained that he does
lease space to churches in other buildings
that he owns in other communities. He
explained that the Dakota Business Plaza is
open during the week from 7:00 A.M. to 5:00
P.M.. He stated that on holidays and weekends
the building is pretty much empty. He
explained that the lease restricts the church
to five parking spaces during the week. He
explained that during church services and
after 5:00 P.M. during the week there are no
parking restrictions. He stated that the
signage is the same type of signage that all
other tenants have which was approved
originally with the building.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that this building is
in a revenue bond financed building. He
explained that the Zoning Ordinance Amendment
is a policy question and a legislative
decision for City Council. He stated that
churches do not pay taxes and that within an
industrial area and the purpose commercial
space is to create tax revenue, a business
climate and jobs. He further stated that the
City may be creating a problem with precedent
setting within the industrial zone if the City
amends the Zoning Ordinance.
Councilmember Anderson stated that the church,
at this time, is in need of more space and
that they need time to generate funding to
construct their own facility and this lease
option suffices their current need for space.
He stated that if the church rents the
property from Mr. Linvill, it helps to pay his
taxes.
Attorney Tom Hart stated that the control over
conditional use permits is significant and
that the very nature of conditional use
permits is to allow the City to impose
reasonable restrictions and conditions upon a
particular use, business or enterprise that is
being conducted. Councilmember Blesener
questioned if the City has the right to
control hours of operation with a conditional
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
♦ �
November 20, 1990
Page 14
use permit. Mayor Mertensotto stated that
conditions have to be germane to the health,
welfare and public safety of the community.
Attorney Tom Hart concurred. �
Councilmember Hartmann reiterated that the
issue is whether a particular use is a
permitted use under a conditional use permit,
that once it is a permitted use that anyone
that wants to make use of the property that
way can apply. Mayor Mertensotto concurred.
Attorney Tom Hart stated that tax exempt
status of churches and schools are governed by
federal law.
Councilmember Cummins questioned if the City
could accommodate Mr. Linvill through a
variance process without a rezoning. Mayor
Mertensotto explained that a variance can only
be granted through a provision if it is a
permitted use within a zone. He stated that
in this case churches are not a permitted use.
Attorney Hart concurred with the Mayor. .
Councilmember Blesener moved to close the
public hearing.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of
Ordinance No. 273, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 401."
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
AYES: 3
NAYS: 2, MERTENSOTTO
HARTMANN
Motion fails.
r 4
ADJOURN
There being no further business to come before
the Council, Councilmember Hartmann moved that
the meeting be adjourned.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:13 o'clock P.M.
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
\
. • ' `1 , . . , : . .' j . . . �:. • .. .. . . , . ' .� . „ .. .. ,. . �. . . •, . . . _' • ' .. . ,' -
MEMO
Date: 17-23-90
T0: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer
SUBJECT: Building Activity Report for November 1990
CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE 90 YEAR TO DATE 89
BUILDING � �
PERMITS: No. Valuation Fee Collected � No. Valuation Fee Collected � No. Valuation Fee Collected
� �
SFD a1 1,810,855.00 15,736.08 � 72 11,785,923.00 101,992.69 � 84 13,497,576.00 117,821.00
APT 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 � 0 � 0 0
TOWNHOUSE 0 0 0 � 6 716,694.00 6,922.59 � 17 2,347,486.00 21,599.15
CONDO 0 0 0 � 16 1,278,376.00 8,116.36 � 43 4,309,292.00 26,308.46
MISC. 78 125,094.00 2,168.10 � 219 1,682,413.00 30,346.56 � 210 1,767,502.00 31,617.54
C/I 9 3,195,284.00 18,809.30 ( 44 5,435,358.00 35,567.05 � 40 6,795,505.00 40,594.20
-------------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Sub Total 38 5,131,233.00 36,713.48 � 357 20,898,764.00 182,945.25 ( 394 28,717,361.00 237,940.35
� �
� �
TRADE � �
PERMITS• I I
� �
Plumbing 5 310.00 � 120 5,666.00 � 771 4,418.00
uater 12 60.00 � 113 565.00 � 165 825.00
Sewer 14 245.00 � 704 1,820.00 � 144 2,520.00
Heat, AC, � I
& Gas 12 575.50 � 157 16,891.85 � 212 20,123.00
-------------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Sub Total 43 7,190.50 � 494 24,942.85 � 692 27,886.00
� �
� �
Licensinq• � I
� �
Contractor's � �
Licenses 46 1,150.00 � 472 11,800.00 � 487 12,175.00
-------------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Total 127 5,131,233.00 39,053.98 �7323 20,898,764.00 219,688.10 �1573 28,717,367.00 278,001.35
NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac, and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee, and
valuation amounts.
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November 29, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administr��.��"
SUBJECT: Dakota County Legislative Policies for 1991
INTRODIICTION
For the past several years, the Cities within Dakota County,
and Dakota County itself, have annually adopted legislative policy
positions which are used to educate and inform our area State
Legislators of our common community concerns. Attached please find
the proposed legislative policies slated for advocacy during 1991.
As part of finalizing the policies, each City is being asked to
formally consider and adopt the attached.
DISCUSSION
A total of twelve legislative positions are proposed for
adoption. A brief summary of each topic is presented below:
1. Special Service District Creation
Cities should have the ability to establish Special Service
Taxing Districts (such as the street light service district in our
industrial park) through a local adoption process, without having
to, in each instance, pursue special enabling legislation from the
State.
2. County State Aid Distribution Formula
The allocation formula and screening process currently
utilized to distribute funds from the State to the County State Aid
Highway system should be modified to more equitably distribute
funds to the Twin Cities Metropolitan area.
3. Drug Enforcement Legislation
Consistent with special legislation approved for several
northern Twin Cities suburbs last session, Dakota County and Cities
within the County should be enabled to special levy for costs
associated with drug enforcement activities.
e
4. Local Boards of Review
Although Dakota County is solely responsible for establishing
property market values throughout the County, individual Cities are
currently required to conduct annual Board of Review meetings.
These meetings require County officials to transport 18,000
appraisal records to 34 separate evening meetings in order to serve
approximately 3,300 taxpayer inquiries. During this past year
Dakota County presented to area Cities a modification to the system
which would in essence eliminate the local Board of Review in favor
of a process which is more efficient, effective and convenient to
County residents. Based on favorable City input, this policy seeks
the necessary State legislation to enact the modification.
5. Hazardous Materials Response
To better protect public health and to plan for chemical
emergencies, it is proposed that a regional approach to hazardous
materials emergency response be authorized and that the State take
a lead role in establishing and coordinating a State wide hazardous
materials response system. Funding for such a system would be from
both public and private entities.
6. Light Rail Transit
Development of a Light Rail Transit (LRT) System in the
Metropolitan area should be coordinated between the various County
Regional Railroad Authorities and should allow for municipal
approval authority for preliminary and final LRT designs.
7. Regional Airport Policv �
The "dual track" process evaluating the options of expanding
MSP verses relocating MSP is supported. A decision to expand MSP
should be driven by air noise mitigation efforts, while the
relocation decision should be based on an analysis of social,
economic and land use implications.
8. Comprehensive Solid Waste Legislation
No major solid waste legislative changes are proposed.
Continued funding for recycling/abatement efforts and market
development for recycled materials is encouraged. �
9. Land Use Planning Leaislation
Supports the legislation being sponsored by the Association of
Metropolitan Municipalities (ANIlK)�which will clarify and recodify
the State's planning/zoning laws. Under the proposal,
municipalities retain appropriate discretion in establishing land
use controls and the City Council retains the final decision on
planning and zoning matters.
10. Road Access Charqe
Legislation is proposed that Cities be permitted to assess new
lots with a road access charge, as is now customarily charged to
developers for water and sewer access. The charge would help
offset arterial road costs within the City, similar to utility area
charges which now help to defray "oversizing costs". This charge
is basically an infrastructure impact fee and will need legislative
authority to enact.
11. Local Government Finance
A number of positions are advanced relative to local
government finance. It is advocated that Levy limits be repealed,
Local Government Aid (LGA) and Homestead and Agricultural Credit
Aid (HACA) payments be maintained or increased, all State mandates
to 1'ocal government be State funded, no mid year property tax
changes be permitted, a metropolitan tax be considered to better
address metropolitan needs and that revisions be made in the
property tax system to more equitably distribute revenues to the
metropolitan area.
12. Retroactive LGA
Prior year LGA payments have traditionally been based on
population estimates issued by the Metropolitan Council. The
preliminary results of the 1990 Census show that the Metropolitan
Council estimates have been historically low, and it is advocated
that Cities receive a one time retroactive LGA payment to reimburse
them for the cost of providing service to this larger population.
IMPLICATIONS
The above described policies were developed over the course of
several months by the various Dakota County City Administrators and
the Dakota County Administrator. Mendota Heights staff inembers
were also asked to participate in drafting the policies and did
provide a number of helpful comments.
Although several of the policies do not directly affect
Mendota Heights and/or have little practical chance of being
enacted into law, the policies do serve a useful purpose
nonetheless in educating our area legislators about community
concerns within Dakota County.
Two of the draft policies deserve specific comment due to
their possible implications. The Drug Enforcement and Local
Government Finance Policies potentially could result in additional
taxes being imposed upon our residents. The Drug Enforcement
Policy (number 3) proposes a special Levy for drug enforcement
activities in an amount up to $3.00 per capita for the County and
$2.00 per capita for the City. Although the authority requested is
enabling only, it is a near certainty that Dakota County will
impose the Levy, if given the authority, to help alleviate the
rising costs of their criminal justice responsibilities.
r
Secondly, the Local Government Finance Policies condone the
enactment of a metropolitan tax to address "new metropolitan
priorities, particularly Light Rail Transit". The tax could take
the form of either a sales or property tax which would be earmarked
by the Legislature for a particular metropolitan need. The ANIl�!
also recently adopted a similar position which particularly
endorses transportation needs. Council should be aware that the
enactment of such legislation could result in an additional
metropolitan tax to support a"metropolitan need" which might not
directly benefit our community in the near future.
RECOI�IENDATION
Recognizing that the draft policies are intended to address
the collective needs of Cities within Dakota County, staff feels
that the policies are appropriate for adoption and advocacy during
the 1991 Legislative Session.
As indicated in the attachment, the Policies are intended to
be presented to our area Legislators at a legislative breakfast
scheduled for Friday, January 11, 1991. If possible,
Councilmembers should make plans to attend this event.
ACTION REOUIRED
Should the draft policies prove acceptable, Council should
consider a motion approving the attached 12 Legislative Policies
for advocacy during the 1991 Legislative session.
MTL:kkb
; �,
DATE:
c�ty of
BURNSVILLE
100 Civic Center Parkway • Burnsville, Minnesota 55337-3817 (612) 895-4400
November 23, 1990
T0: Dakota County Staff
Dakota County Administrators/Managers
Dakota County Township Clerks
FROM: Jill Shorba, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Dakota County Managers Meeting
Thursday, December 13, 1990, 10:00 a.m.
Rosemount City Hall
At the last Dakota County Managers meeting, members reviewed and
discussed the twelve proposed legislative positions. The changes
which were suggested have been incorporated and the updated
positions are enclosed.
Please discuss the proposed positions with your City Council or
County Board members. We will finalize these positions at our next
meeting on �Thursday, December 13, at 10:00 a.m. at Rosemount City
Hall.
Our Legislative Breakfast is scheduled for Friday, January 11, at
7:30 a.m. in Rosemount. Please inform your Boards/Councils of this
date and encourage their attendance.
If you have any questions, please give me a call at 895-4469.
Enclosures
ti�
7.> -
� F
• L�:
LEGISLATIVE POSITIONS ,.
DEVELOPED BY
DAKOTA COUNTY AND
CONSTITUENT CITIES
I991 PROPOSED
�
� -� SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT LEGISLATION
Position Statement
. . t.
BACKGROUND
�•.
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 428A allows municipalities to establish Special
Service Districts for the purposes of providing levels of public services
above and beyond the normal level otherwise provided throughout the city. The
purpose of these service districts is to recognize that certain types of
property require certain additional levels of public services that should not
be financed from the general fund property tax of the city. Examples of such
services include but are not limited to additional street lighting, parking
lot and street maintenance, landscaping, signage, refuse collection, security,
transportation services, as well as advertising and promotion. A service
charge would be levied on the property within the--bo�undaries of the district
to pay for the desired services. Consequently, only property inside the
district boundaries�would receive benefit from the services.
M.S. Chapter 428A is standard "boilerplate" language regarding special service
districts. Each�proposed district must be approved as enabling.legislation
, for the requesting city. Once the enabling legislation has been approved, the
city must adopt a local ordinance establishing the district. The statute is
very specific about the hearing and publication process that needs to occur
before the district can be approved. If 35 percent of the landowners in the
district file an objection prior to the ordinance's effective date, the
/ ordinance is void. All residential property within the district is exempt
from paying any of the service charge levied by the city.
An annual hearing must also be held before approval of a levy to support the
future year's work or program. The governing body approves the levy by
resolution. Service charge levies are not included in levy limit
calculations. The city may bond for district improvements and pay for them by
pledging the annual service charge levy. The governing body ma appoint an
advisory board or act as the board for the district.
Twenty-five (25) percent of all landowners and landowners who represent 25
percent of the property value must file a petition requesting (or approving) a
proposal prior to council action; the same 25 percent plus 25 percent ratio is
needed prior to approval of a service charge and levy. It can be vetoed by a
petition of 35 percent of the landowners or owners who represent 35 percent of
the property value.
Action which would approve other types of service charges other than a levy
are also subject to a-petition of 25 percent of the businesses in the
district. If 35 percent of the business owners object ta the service charges,
the adoption of these service fees would be voided.
The service fee vetoes or petition provisions do not apply to succeeding years
once a service charge has been approved and not challenged in the first year.
_�'
� SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT LEGISLATION
� Position Statement �
�
POSITION �,;
Special service districts provide the opportunity to make public improvements
to specific areas of a community and generates the necessary finances directly
from those who will benefit without the restrictions of using special
assessments. The service charge is totally a local option tool by the
governing body and the amount of the service charge is determined by the
business proprietors and property owners based on the type of service and
level of service they desire to have. The hearing and petition process
provides adequate assurances of citizen participation and flexible
opportunities to create, modify, and repeal the--di�strict and its provisions.
RECOMMENDATION
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 428A should be amended to repeal the requirement of
the approval of enabling legislation for special service districts. The
�establishment of such districts should begin with the local adoption process.
JUSTIFICATION
1
Because special service districts have no taxing or spending impact on persons
or property outside the boundaries of the district,.and because the provisions
of the districts are directed entirely by those being levied� and receiving
benefit from the services., legislative approval is simply not necessary. The
use of special service districts recognizes the need of areas within
communities that require additional and unique types and levels of public
services. Because legislative requests for special service districts
typically contain standardized language and are of only local consequence,
they are frequently neglected during the legislative process. Finally, all
communities should have an equal opportunity to secure special service
district approval.
.��
�
1
�./
COUNTY STATE AID DISTRIBUTION FORMULA
Position Statement
BACKGROUND � �
The constitutional amendment that:governs the distribution of the Highway
Users Fund was adopted in 1958 and provided for 629'0 of the monies in the fund
to be distributed to state roads, 29� to be distributed to county roads and 9�0
to city roads.
The distribution of these funds among the county and city road systems is
governed by both statute and administrative rule. For a variety of reasons
the distribution of the city funds has continued to meet the changing needs
the cities and the population growth and has resulted in a formula that
distributes approximately 80�0 of the city state aid highway funds to cities
the seven county metropolitan area. Changes in�'the�distribution for the
County State Aid Highway (CSAH) funds, however, have not followed the
of
in
population growth, and as a result, we find that today only about 17.7 of the
CSAH funds are distributed to counties in the seven county metropolitan�area.
Because virtually all of Dakota County's use of CSAH funds�are expended within
the various cities in Dakota County and the resulting improvements to the
county road system is a direct benefit to the cities in Dakota County, it
would be beneficial to both Dakota County and cities of Dakota County to bring
about a more equitable distribution of CSAH funds.
The current statutory distribution formula is as follows:
10%
10�
30%
50qo
equally to the 87 counties
based on the number of vehicles registered
the number of miles of CSAH roads
on need as determined by the Screening Committee
The Screening Committee is made up of one representative from each of the 9
State Highway districts of which there are 2 in the seven county metro area.
The definition of needs is mainly spelled out in administrative rule, but
proposed revisions are discussed and voted on by the members of the Screening
Committee which is dominated by the rural part of Minnesota.
The Legislature has appointed a Transportation Study Board which is currently ..
studying the subjects of road jurisdiction and funding. The goals of this
committee should include simplifying the system that is used in distributing
dedicated highway funds including gas tax monies and making sure that this
distribution is done in a fair manner.
It is estimated that the metropolitan area is contributing approximately 45q
of the dedicated highway fund money and receiving only 16.69'0 of the money in
return. It is recognized that changes are needed in the growing urban areas
of Minnesota to meet the traffic demands that go with this rapid growth. It
is also recognized that the rural counties of the state need to have funding
maintained to support a logical inter-county road system.
:�
COUNTY STATE AID DISTRIBUTION FORMULA Page 2
�� Position Statement
.._. .. t•
The preliminary discussions of the�.Transportation Study Board indicate the
division of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) funding should be maintained at
60qo for construction and 40% for maintenance. The construction portion of the
funding is presently contemplated to include factors for vehicle registration
and land miles with an individual county construction cost index to be used
for adjustment between high and low cost construction areas. The maintenance
portion of the funding could be based on the relative number of vehicle
registrations and lane miles in each individual county.
It is expected that the Transportation Study Board will try to maintain
minimum funding in counties at present levels with new money needed to support
the additional cost required, the majority of whicfi tincrease is expected�to go
to the urban growing counties of the state.
RECOMMENDATIONS -�� -�
�..
It is recommended that the concepts proposed by the Transportation Study Board
as detailed above be supported. Should the attempt to change County State Aid
Highway funding as contemplated by the Transportation Study Board fail, the
following recommendations are made to the current statutory distribution
formula.
J - Modify the current statutory distribution formula as follows:
10�o equally to the 87 counties
30% based on the number. of vehicles registered
30� the number of miles of CSAH roads
30� on need as determined by the Screening Committee
- Assign greater priority to the number of vehicles registered, and reduce
the importance of the needs factor.
- Expand membership of the Screening Comnittee to 14 members by adding a
member for each of the urban counties (over 175,000 population).
- Base funding on lane miles rather than center-line miles.
�./
�
�
L�
DRUG ENFORCEMENT LEGISLATION
Position Statement
BACKGROUND " '�
. �. -
During the last session, special legislation was passed on behalf of a group
of cities in the northwestern Metro area. The legislation allowed those
cities (Maple Grove, Brooklyn Park, Brooklyn Center, and Coon Rapids)
continuing authority to levy up to a2.00 per capita annually, above their levy
limits for drug enforcement. Specifically, the money can be used to pay
salaries and benefits for peace officers under a joint powers agreement whose
primary responsibilities are to investigate controlled substance crimes or to
teach DARE curricula in schools.
RECON�NIENDATION
Draft legislation providing for a�2.00 per capita levy for Dakota County
cities, and also a$3.00 per capita levy for County drug enforcement and
incarceration (including educational, treatment, and a7ternative programs)
, should be introduced and supported as a Dakota County special bill.
�
�
LOCAL BOARDS OF REVIEIi
Position Statement
BACKGROUND ,
Current law in Minnesota (Minn..�tat. 274.01) requires town boards and city
councils to serve as local boards of review on an annual basis between April 1
and May 31, to hear and deal with complaints regarding assessment of real
property for tax purposes. Aggrieved persons may also appear at a county
board of equalization, held between June 15 and June 30, or file for an
abatement (Minn. Stat. 270.07) or file a petition in Tax Court (Minn. Stat.
278.01).
In Dakota County, attendance at local boards of review and the County Board of
Equalization has increased dramatically in recent years, totaling
approximately 3;000 in 1990. Recent changes in�the�State's tax laws will
likely maintain or increase the level of interest. Since 1970 all assessment
of real property in Dakota County has been handled by the County. There is no
local assessment responsibility for cities or townships. County Assessor's
Office personnel are solely responsible for establishing market-value on all
real property (approximately 105,000 parcels). The same staff inembers attend
all thirty-four (34) local boards of review and the County Board of
Equal�ization to meet with county residents and answer questions.
Currently meetings are required to be held in all thirty-four taxing
jurisdictions during the months of April and May. Typically these are evening
meetings for the convenience of the Board members and taxpayers. However,
many taxpayers work evenings, thereby making attendance a hardship. Many
times 200-500 people attend these meetings. The volume of inquiries, along
with the limited available time to review them, makes this system both -
inefficient and costly. It simply.is not feasible to handle 3,300 taxpayer
inquiries during 34 evening meetings. It is not efficient, or safe to
transport up to 18,000 appraisal records to each local community�as required
by law. The time span between local boards and the County Board of
Equalization is not sufficient for our staff to complete the review process.
Also, taxpayers do not have sufficient time to prepare evidence which may
support their position.
In an effort to simplify this annual process, streamline the tax review
procedure, save on substantial amounts of county staff time and overtime and ,..
recognizing the County's responsibility in administering the real property tax
system, it is suggested Dakota County seek special legislation to exempt the
County from the requirements of Minn. Stat. 274.01. Cities and townships of
less than 2500 population would have the option°of exclusion from this
proposal. -
Endorsement for the County proposal to exempt Dakota County from the Local
Board of Review legislation has-been received from the cities of Eagan,
Burnsville and Rosemount. Most of the other�cities gave verbal support of the
proposal.
LOCAL BOARDS OF REVIEW
` Position Statement
_. .. �. �
On March 27, 1990, the Dakota County Board of Co�rniss,ioner passed Board
Resolution No. 90-301. The resolution reads as follows:
Page 2
� • I:• :
WHEREAS, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners has proposed special
legislation relating to Local Boards of Review exempting Dakota County
from the requirements of Minn. Stat. 274.01; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners has received numerous resolutions
from cities in Dakota County in support of this legislation; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that all townships, and those cities
with a populaticn of less than 2,500 in Dakota County, be given the
option of exclusion from the merger of the L-ocal and County Board of��
Equalization.
RECOMMENDATION
�
Support the passage of legislation which would exempt Dakota County from the
requirements of Minn. Stat. 274.01, subject to acceptance by the cities or
townships with a population of 2,500 or less. Section 2 of the proposed act
should also be extended to include the month of April, as well as May and
June.
`�- It will also be necessary to update the effective date from the listed in
Section 3 of the Board Resolution, to August 1, 1991.
�
�
HAZARD�US MATERIALS RESPONSE
Position Statement
BACKGROUND � � � � - - ''
In 1986 Congress passed the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act
as Title III of the Superfund Am+�ndments and Reauthorization Act (SARA).
Congress enacted this law to help local communities protect public health and
plan for chemical emergencies. To implement Title III, Congress required each
state to appoint a State Emergency Response Commission (SERC), and this
Commission then established Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPC).
Although these Local Planning Committees exist, there is no statewide
coordination for hazardous materials response. At a local level, the
development of hazardous materials response capabilities is usually dependent
on city size and the perceived threat of hazardous materials incidents. It is
often too expensive to adequately provide hazardous materials response at the
local level. New federal law requires all personnel responding to hazardous
materials emergencies�to be properly trained and equipped. These standards
require the vast majority of fire departments to provide additional extensive
training or be in violation of the law. It is impossible�at the city or
county level to meet these training requirements�within a reasonable cost.
One alternative is to pool resources so every jurisdiction does not have to
develop and maintain specialized hazardous response teams. Regionally
�s organized�response teams are the most effective and economical approach for
responding to hazardous materials emergencies. In 1990, the legislature
passed a law requiring the Commissioner of Public Safety to plan a statewide
'�.,� .system.of response to hazardous materials release emergencies. An advisory
`-` council was established to assist the Commissioner and consists of inembers
from the fire service, the public, business, and industry, and a
representative from local government. This plan is to be submitted January 1,
1991. Based on this plan, legislation will be recommended which will
establish a response system, standards for response and a fee structure to
support the system.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Authorize the establishment of regional hazardous materials response
teams to provide response to all communities within a district. ��
2. Designate a central state organization to establish, direct and
coordinate a hazardous materials response system.
Under the direction of the Department of Public Safety
This organization would provide consistent standards and operating
procedures and would insure proper response throughout the state.
3. The State should support funding to cover the training, equipment, and
operational costs necessary to develop regional hazardous materials
teams which meet Federal and State safety and training regulations.
`� 4. A funding approach should be developed which supports a public private
partnership.
�
LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
Position Statement
BACKGROUND '�
The State Legislature mandated t�at the Regional Transit Board's Joint Light
Rail Transit Committee, comprised of county regional railroad authorities,
prepare a Light Rail Transit Coordination Plan. The Plan will identify
organizational and implementation methods for light rail transit in the
metropolitan area. The plan will also include a 10-year schedule and budget
for LRT implementation. The 10-year schedule will present the costs for
implementing the corridor staging priorities adopted by the Regional Transit
Board in 1990. The staging priorities for corridors in Dakota County include
the St. Paul south to TH 100 in Group B and an extension of I-35W to TH 13 in
Group C.
The Joint LRT Advisory Committee has recommended a one cent sales tax for
transportation purposes�with one-half cent dedicated to LRT construction. The
County and cities should receive a"fair share" of funds based upon
contribution. �
The LRT Coordination Plan will also identify the lead agency �for implementing
LRT in the region. The county regional railroad authorities have taken the
lead in preparing plans and preliminary designs for light rail transit. Under
current legislation, the cities maintain an approval authority over
preliminary and final designs for LRT. _
� The construction of light rail transit should be implemented by a Joint Powers
Board comprised of regional railroad authorities. The Joint Powers Board
should also contract with MN/DOT for construction of LRT if located within a
State right-of-way.
RECOMMENDATIONS
- If a regional sales tax is approved for funding broad-based
transportation needs, the level of funding should be sufficient for road
improvement needs and light rail transit within Dakota County.
Support the implementation of light rail transit in the metropolitan
area through a lead role by a Joint Powers Board comprised of county
regional railroad authorities.
Support a continuation of the approval authority by municipalities for
preliminary and final design of LRT.
Support the involvement of MN/OOT in the constructi-0n �f LRT in State
�right of ways.
�/
�
REGIONAL AIRPORT POLICY
Position Statement
BACKGROUND �� '
. ,. -
The Twin Cities Metropolitan region has actively debated noise and adequacy
issues for almost twenty-five years as they relate to the Minneapolis/St. Paul
airport. At the direction of the legislature, the Metropolitan Council
undertook a study of the Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport to
consider its adequacy to meet traffic demands in the future and the
environmental� capacity (e.g., noise) of the community to coexist with the
•airport. Following eighteen months of study, the Council's Airport Adequacy
Task Force recommended that the Metropolitan Council and Metropolitan Airports
Commission implement a"dual track approach" that includes enhancement of
capacity at the current site and land banking in anticipation of a replacement
airport should future air traffic demands warrant it. In 1989, the dual-track
approach recommended by the Adequacy study was incorporated into legislation
which established time lines for various tasks.
A number of groups and studies have proposed alternatives for the enhancement
, of capacity of the current airport which could have direct or indirect effects
on Dakota County. These enhancements include the extension of existing
runways, addition of runways and a reorientation of its departure routes to
the south and southeast over Burnsville, Eagan and other parts of Dakota
County. The Airport Adequacy Task Force also concluded that there is a �
reasonable risk that the current airport's capacity will be exceeded within
- five years. To meet demand for ten to twenty years, while land banking and
environmental reviews are conducted for a potential relocation, additional
capacity will be developed at the current airport. As this time period
expires, a decis�on�would be made to either construct an additional runway at
the existing site or to implement a relocation. The addition of a new north-
south runway, immediately adj�acent to Cedar Avenue, would introduce additional
flights over Burnsville, Eagan and other parts of Dakota County. The addition
of a third parallel runway would bring additional flights over Mendota
Heights, Eagan, Mendota, Lilydale and other parts of Dakota County. Noise
impacts are difficult to predict because the quieter "Stage III" generation
aircraft are expected to be integrated in airline fleets during this same time
period.
If relocation occurs, it will present the classic public policy dil,emma - what
to do with a very good thing which has some very bad side effects? Economic
benefits to Dakota County from proximity to an airport could be lost, shifted
or gained in a relocation, depending on the location of a new site. Moreover,
the uncertainty of re�ocation could cause developer reluctance to invest in
either existing or potential Dakota County locations. The Metropolitan
Council is developing its guidelines for reviewing land use changes in new
airport search areas. These guidelines will set the stage for city, county
and township involvement in the search/siting process. Dakota County has the
entire spectrum of land uses within its boundaries, from urban to suburban to
rural. Defining "acceptable land use" within areas designated as "search
� areas" and finally as "site areas" may adversely affect any unit of government
in which these areas are located.
i REIONAL AIRPORT POLICY Page 2
� �`- Position Statement
7he Metropolitan Council has already ind3cated that Southern Dakota County and
Anoka County are the areas being,.considered for search areas.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The "dual track appraach" of the Airport Adequacy Task Force is a reasonable
m�ans ta aliaw a smoath transition fram the current s�te, {and its capacity),
ta a higher capacity at the current or a new site. It also keeps regional
options open in t�e event that capacity prajectians prove inaccuraie, bui it
cauld also introduce uncertainties in Dakota County that may dislncate
commercial a�d residential development. In the�final 8ri81ys1s��the COU�ty�s
best interests may be served by a policy of support for the use and expansion
of the current site and, if relocation is necessary, suppart for a site of
sufficient s�ze ia avert environmentai issues af noise while alsa minimizing
adverse economic impacts on Dakota County. Consideratian for effects on
residents, landawners and existing business must be as encompassing as
passi�ble and should include,social as well as economic issues. The relocation
of the airpori would change forever the ruraljagr3calturai nature of soathern
Dakota County as well as the northern`"areas which have experienced development
and growth because of the existing airport. Suppart for a new site shnuld
aisa be contingent on two other conditionst
l. Enhancement of the capaciiy at the existing airport must be accompanied
by an equally zealaus cammitment to the mitigation of passible air.craft
noise consequences. Any new ar changed distributian af aircraft noise
in Dakota�County should reflect and be firmly guided by existing
community comprehensive pians and settlement patterns.
2. Site choices and landbanking decisions must be based on the total
speciram af sociojecanomic issues and•must pratect the rights of
landawners and residents. The "alternative environmental review
pracess" be�ng propased by the Metropaiitan Cauncil must address this
broader spectrum of issues. A clear, decisive policy must be in place
before a site is chosen which ailows loca3 governments to;
a} Request baundary changes of the finai search area ar ta "opt out"
of the search area.
b} Request variances to the iand use requirements and strict
interpretations of the land use guidelines far "search" and "site"
areas. - -
c) Esiablish an aathority to hear appeals by local governmeni to land
use regulations for search/site areas.
�
�;
COMPREHENSIVE SOLID WASTE LEGISLATION
Position Statement
BACKGROUND "
Since April 1989 all single fami�.y homes in Dakota County have had an
opportunity to recycle (at the curb) newspaper, aluminum/tin cans, and glass.
Some haulers are also collecting waste oil, lead acid batteries, corrugated
cardboard and beverage plastics. In June 1990 the Dakota County Recyclables
Collection Center (RCC) began accepting from haulers on a voluntary basis
plastic beverage containers and is currently reviewing the acceptance of other
recyclables at the RCC. Over 1,000 tons per month of recyclables are
delivered to the RCC each month. In addition, a majority of all multi-family
buildings will be on line by the end of 1990. The County will be completing a
commercial r.ecycling strategy in early 1991 and is also nearing completion on
a waste characterization study for the County. �
A major task in 1991 will be to design a solid waste management plan to
recycle 35� of the County's waste by 1993 as required under SCORE. It is
expected that solid waste management will continue to be one of the major
environmental issues for Dakota County in 1991. �� �
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. There should be no major statutory changes for the metropolitan solid
waste management system.
- Government and private industry are fine tuning their collection
q and processing systems to both expand the system and make it more
economical. Major changes could disrupt this system.
- It is important to allow individual counties and cities an
opportunity to implement a recycling program which meets the
currently mandated recycling goals and also reflects the
individual characteristics and preferences of their communities.
Additional legislation should take place only if these goals are
not met. Any SCOPE (Select Committee on�Packaging and
Environment) recommendation should be considered in this context.
2. Current funding mechanisms and levels for recycling and abatement
efforts should be maintained or expanded.
SCORE monies should be continued/expanded and should be
distributed for abatement purposes only.
Any new requirements by the State for recycling activities should
provide comparable funding.
3. While it is important to expand the collection sys�emf markets must be
available and industry should be encouraged.
- Existing subsidies on virgin materials should be evaluated.
- The Metropolitan Council and the Office of Waste Management should
work jointly on regional market development efforts.
� 4. Existing legislation outlining battery manufacturers' responsibilities
should be enforced by the State.
�r�:._
�' LAND USE PLANNING I.EGISLATIQN
Position 5taiement '
. . _ . t.
BACKGRQUND � � ��
. �.:
S.F, i5I0/H.F. 165�4 (from lasi sessionj was developed ta unify, clarify, and
recodify the existing planning law for all local units of government.
Aithaugh it represenied a substaniial improvement fram earlier drafis, it
appeared to have some conflicts with the Land Use Planning Act governing Metro
area cities. '
Variaus effarts duriag the interim to reconcile the problems discavered have
noi been successfui. Therefore, the Assaciatian af Meirapoliiac�
Municipalities (AMM) has undertaken to draft a bill that includes the best
features and avoids the areas af unnecessary comfi-ict.
RECOMMENDATIONS `
Support.the passage of AMM-sponsored iegislation to accomplish the follawing: '
� l. Cadify and unify state plann�ngjzaning law, provided ihat municipaliiies
retain appropriate aptions for their own unique circumstances.
� 2. Retain the ability of elected City Council members to have the finai
�.- decision on glanning and zoaing issues, if they wish. -
3. Allow cities at least five years to update their laws ta the proposed
standard. � .
4. Prov9de coasistency with aiher state requirements on ciiies, notabiy the
Land Use Planning Act. � .
Any praposed amendments to dilute or divest powers historicaiiy assigned to
elected public officials shauld be defeated.
s�
� �� LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID
Position Statement
BACKGROUND "
Dakota County cities have been sutistantially shorted in state aids for the
last several years judging from the recently released preliminary U.S. Census
figures. State aids are based on estimates provided by the Metropolitan
Council, and those estimates appear (for Dakota County cities) to be
consistently low.
Dakota Countv II 250,310 II 274,016 II 8.7 II ...
RECOMMENDATION
Due to this large, consistent difference for Dakota County.cities, a one-time
adjustment in Local Government Aid should be made to reimburse these cities
proportionately for improperly calculated state aid.
�_�
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAROTA COUNTY
PARRS AND RECREATZON COMMISSIC?N MINOTES
NOVEMBER 13, 2990
A�pecial meeting af the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation
Commission was held on Tue�day November 27, 1990 in the City Hall
Conferenee Room, 1101 Victaria Gurve. Chair Jahn Huber callad the
meeting to arder at 7:00 o'clo�k p.m. The following members were
present: Huber, Hunter, Katz and Spicer. Klea.ngl.ass, Damberg and
Lundeen were excused. Staff inembers present ware Parks Project
Manager Guy Kullander, Parks Leadperson Terry Blum and
Ad�ninis�rati.ve Assistant Kevin Batchel.der. Barry Warner and
Augustine Wong, of Barton-Aschman, Keith Heaver and Jim Kilburg
were alsa present.,
�,'F PRELIMSNARY SKETCHES OF
MENDAKOTA PARK
Chair Jahn Huber introduaed Ba�rry Warner and
Augustine Wong, of Barton-Aschman who were presen�
to discuss preliminary ske�.ches they had prepared
for the layout of the athletic fields at the
recently acquired Mendakota Park. Barry Warner
presented an overview o£ four alternative sketches
that were displayed on the walls, each with
different configurations.
Barry Warner discussed the opportunities and
constraints of the site. He stated that the site
was flat and this meant less grading, that there
existed some black dirt on the site that could be
used to alleviate having to haul a11 of it a.n, that
the natural. drainage was favorable and that there
existed quite a bit of sandy sail that would be
good for percolation, enough so that drain tile
would not have ta be used. like at Sa.bley. Mr.
Warner e�lained that the high point o� topography
was at the center oi' the southern border and that a
strip o� waaded area existed along �he southern
border. Mr. Warner stated vegetation removal would
be minimal.
Mr. Warner stated that the NSP easement running
through the western end of the site was a
canstraintl tha� grading or p2ayfields could not
occur in the easement. He stated t�hat both power
lines and gas lines existed in the easement.
Mr. Warner stated that storm sewer was present and
that a hydrant was present for irrigation. Mr.
Warner stated that �.here wa� an opportunity for on
street parking along th� south side oi Mendakota
Drive.
Mr. Warner explained that all four concepts allow �
for four softball fields with a standard of 280'
outfield fences. He stated the concepts differ in
their configurations and that some include a full
sized soccer field and free skating rink. He
stated all four concepts have the neighborhood park
amenities located at the west end of the park
adjacent to the single family homes and that this
includes play structure, hardcourt and the other
typical neighborhood park amenities. He stated
that some concepts showed tennis courts as a
possible land dedication by the developer of
Mendakota Estates.
Mr. Warner presented the details of Park Concept A
through D. Mr. Warner followed these descriptions
by stating that he felt strongly that this should n�
be a community oriented park with softball only as
a primary feature. He stated this meant that
soccer, skating, play structure, open areas, etc.
should also be incorporated, that the opportunity
existed to provide the community with many various
park uses in this facility.
Commissioner Katz agreed with this concept and
stated that she did not prefer Concept D as it had
auto traffic bisecting the park. Mr. Warner stated ,
that this option was provided in case the Fire
Department had qualms about emergency access to the
Fire Station during peak park hours. Staff was
directed to consult with Public Safety for a review
of the preferred design.
The Commission agreed that auto traffic bisecting
the park and utilizing the NSP easement to access
Dodd Road should not be used, provided the Fire
Department concurred. The Planning Commission
discussed parking. Mr. Warner indicated the
standard for parking is 30-40 spaces per playing
field. Location of parking to the fields and to
the skating rink was discussed.
The Commission discussed a possible land dedication
for tennis courts with Mr. Keith Heaver, a
developer in Mendakota Estates. Mr. Heaver stated
the association was considering the dedication of a
single family lot for use in the park as a tennis
court. Commissioner Spicer indicated that the City
had an adequate number of tennis courts to meet
demand and that a tennis court had not been
included in Mendakota Park and had not been
budgeted for in the referendum. Parks Project -
Manager Kullander stated it cost $20,000 to �'1
�l
V �
construct one court. Mr. Heaver stated that the
� association would consider dedicating the land and
constructing the tennis courts, if the City would
maintain and insure them. Kullander stated that if
the association was willing to do this they should
request it in writing and the City could consider
accepting this and including it in the construction
bid to save on construction costs.
The Commission discussed designing the softball
field layout in a pinwheel fashion with the comfort
station at the hub of the four fields. After this
discussion the Commission concurred that the
pinwheel design was most favorable. The Commission
concurred that the layout should be a pinwheel
layout of four 280' softball fields on the east end
of the park with a 330' by 195' soccer field to the
west of the softball fields, with one parking lot
of 100-140 spaces, with a comfort station in the
hub of the softball pinwheel, a warming house by
the free skating area and neighborhood park
facilities on the western end of the park past the
power line easement. Mr. Heaver stated he was
comfortable with the preferred design, which he
felt met the needs of the neighbors.
Kullander stated that this concept has what the
, ballplayers want, yet provides open areas for
general use, soccer and skating. Kullander stated
that Barton-Aschman would prepare final sketches
for presentation at the December 4, 1990 City
Council meeting, that Council would review it and
provide direction to the Commission so that the
Commission could approve final plans at their
December 11, 1990 meeting.
ADJOIIRN
There being no further business the Parks and
Recreation Commission adjourned to their regular
December meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
�►
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
December 4, 1990
General Contractors Licenses
L. H. Bolduc Co., Inc.
Wooddale Builders, Inc.
Masonry Licenses
Mrozik Const., Inc.
Heatina & A/C License
Aspen Heating & A/C
� a
s
De'a 4, 2990
Td: Fiagor and City Counci2
CLAZMS LIST SUMM7lRY:
TotaZ C.Iaimc
Significant C3��mc
70,435
,�gC Sewer 30,497
..;��.-a;.-�.'�.�;:.�ro:�.�i�'",.�'�i;.�:a:;.��.��i3.�S,`.�` �?�,�^e�i.�H::�;,�'��'.�:3a�?�?;,��,'*�;i�E�'cYa�.`�,.��5{.Y"�,`�k��:
� Unasual CZaims
Barr Engr Water plan 1,404
Briggs & Morgan Pk Bd Lega2 3,74$
t�ept_ lU-Adm ---.--- Dept 50-Rd&Bridge - -- - -- - - - -- - --- --- --------� �..._-�._,
a�—•- -• - - - - - -----` 30-FireCe 80-PZrannings I
_J
q�� �yygr 12/4/9� �iaims zsst 40-CEO 85-Recycling Fege s '1�`
I�7��:¢+7--pry----------•--•---•------•----_--- _ _._.---�ity-ar Mei�datR-Hetghts--�..�_-----�-------90-AnimaZ-Control.�-.•.--------•----.v..- --.�_i
i { I
z i� '�
3. ?em¢ �heck Nermbnr _.+------•F2 - '4,
...-- •�-- ---- --'•--- ----•-- -,._ �.--. ...------
q ._�.__�.�___.�._�_—'—..'_�"""._�.�__._..�'__"""_�'�".— '_'__ '
iBJJ7�. ' G � r
� � �'Y12C3f � •
amber-Vendat^ �tJam�-------------_.------�icc�.�unt-�ade - --- .-_._.._-- - �._._�-----�amrr�rrts------�------�._�___�_,-.----Amc.trnt----- --------�E•I
i�
:��'r�
a
�s
s p T�� Yh1 -4r:1 �-1 2 tZr-2 @ ] d ca ] 2 5 �. Sfi �' �
to -A'i_4-.}._-.__--------_-- � -�-^---�-Q+3 -424'd��c'c'`4ti-; T -�- -- ------�----.,..v ..._.1 d-c�3 S S-^--'------- ---3+4:-9� ---- - ���
�ei
�� 2 fi T 6 T +TY-�i:^2¢r-�h3�-J�2+ 3d call� '3.:SY_t �i''�"�3
.. ,-
----- .,
�' r•�
'72 -----�-'-------49.9�•---^ .___.�------_..�__---` -
3 '-- - - - ---------•- -. _^�.�.----�_ __-�__._._ ._ ..._ _...--- ---�------------ ---- ----
13 "�
14 Tata2s 7'ernp �hech Number 2 ,'�
I I , �„
�.�:�.
_—_ -_.------------- -- �_...�.----
r eck-Ncrmtrer-------.-- --•-- —.------�__...- ----••- -------- -- - ..�._� - _ : ,�
i
L FSThi �2 -9;?1�-4��0-� Dec 5vc Y 4. S�9
':.
--'�-f3F-d`F ----"'--__�_.�__._.'-----t7+7-9c'�2t2�-t2�7�-7gi---•----'------'--Dec-•swC��-'-•' ---'-----34:�4---.� ._�_�
L AT 4i' 3�-429 ff+-OE.rh-6YT i>ec �vc 2 9. 8+3 +zc� ,
—£,._ �._..__-' ---------------�-------�---._�__._�._�_._._.--- — '--- ----'-4'zar91- ---------- -
::�
7'ata.ts 7rmp ChecH 1Vz�mbcr c ��+��
,;>�i
rp-�h �cfc-iV umber---------- 3
3 A1 b2 nsc»
3
7ota2s Temp �trecse tazrmber
T�mp �hecfr ?+tznnber 4
—�i-Fimrr2rarrfvat� ana3-Ra»k-
4 Amertcan Mat.tana2 Pa»h
fi firaet�2 carr N�t 3 a»a3 t*a»h
. , �'+o
Tata�s F�rap CriecH Metmber
Taurp �hec?c Netmbc+s^
� -Par-r-Sng2 neer2 ng --Cc -
J
�ots7]-5 Ttmp-Gri�cH-l@t+mber
Temp Lh�ch Mctraber
, 6 ttev2» 9atchelde?r
Tata2s Tr3mp CriecH MumC�i^
�
s
@+�-43�-= �-1 �
3
�
d38-^4L��''f_+-tZr�.hO-•t2n2+
2 3-416-2��L'�-f[rfCr
4
splys
svc re
svc Yee
3�. 82
31. 5;�
48. t2at7+
:SQF. 4�Y�
43✓. 3Q�
�s-��-s:�-�a�Sr-M2�-------- Re-L4ty�-tvater-p]a» -- —sisie9.-3EF
3 s 4@4� 3a't
�' �_' �_�_
K2-4fi8tEe-12�N-10 HJf}UMR mtg . 14.8rQ+
� - -- -1 ti. 2�20
6
57 9 t?2 chard E+,]or}t] trnCt � 01-9:=`31-09Sr-�i7� 2 rispect 2 a+rs � 1�.... i�r¢+ --
7 2'�'�u. BFS+
7at�2s 7emp Checu taermber 9
3
13G'�•
__�—.__._...__= y
f z�, �
'33j ..
;n ��
�02� 1
t4n
!4'v�
i4E' •
4'i:
I�F,�
—_ ..__ '�+'1
:,o!r �
�5'I�
��_,-.., --- --- -- - - - - - �- --- - ----------------- ----
t
4 Dec s93S' �]aims L2st fiag� L
I- - -- -- -- - - - - - - -- - • -• - -M ^-------- ---- -_------ --�- -------__ _� ,____ ._.
��!-T't"Te 11:t7r7 AM �lty c�!' eitidota Hclght.s ��
zl i?��
f 3� Temp �»ecfc tVerrnber S �� ��
- •-- -- �. ._- - - - ... - '- - -- •-- • -'- -- ---. _..`.--•---- ------ -- ----- - —� ,
i� �'�
� 5 � Tem¢. �
i � �hecic ( e I �
� i7m�ei�'-Ve»tlot^-7Jarae -- ----�--� - - --� -- -- t5ocyc.a�rrt" �cde'- �-- --•--�- ---� - ---�- �-----•Camm�n8s ----••------,-- --�Amaunt �...-_ • ,
7 ���
�tOtr+a
8
� .� �• ,.
`y b Srlggs iC Morgai� �7+3-H2if-�trrZ+ffr-tin2+ Re p��^u ref 3,79r3.3�Ye �!
� � ---'-- ------� '------ - --- - ...._.. __ .--'--. . .- - �- -" -�-------• -- ----'- ----.�_»__._._..�_..____.�._._—L_�_ '=
t0� -_-_--�- ---' -;:�
�i�� p 3� 799. 3in ( •;-�.
I�Z� ?'crta.ts Temp Check Ntrmber 6 �'j �
i73
--__ .- _. - -- '- -- �- ---• --� -- -� - --- �' ---- - -- - -'- - - --'•- --'�----- --------------------._'_.__-'-----....�..�_�.__..���_,.� ;�,
14 7emp �h�ck Mumber 9 ������+,
I! i;g,
75f :tl�
'��i"9-P�1a'»d-iaw»"3VC----.-'"-._-----�-2�5=433�-Qr2��-�fn--------------•--'-�Oct'�svc --- —'—"-'EEO=C�¢�-"'- --- ;ev
,�� �?•"'�..3
2
���i 9 ' 6¢..�FO ;�:�
�is �ata-l�s-Yemp-U"nec7c--M�tmber�..�---�-------9------�------ -�_.------..----•- �- — - ---- - � �Z,i
so' ' ;zs�--�
j27� T�m{s ChecK fY�tmber 9¢� �1i;
;-�i
t �
!ZT— 2Yh £�v.�2ne5s l=c+rms V� -Arotg---- ----- QS-H38�4-3YS.-1� -- -• -^---•'-------- W 2s ' -- — --. 25.4¢+ i '�c�,--.
�'24�, 1�h Ptrsliaess fiorras b ficctg tt+2-Ji38�¢'+-¢�E�-��2t W�s 18.1iZ+ �y�� �
JI---2Yct-,�trs7»�ss-•Fc7rms- A--ficct g - -----4rY-43�N-¢r32/-:�0 - --- ---• ---- -1J -s�s — ----16r14+— ,,,
26 2tA Pi15117885 f�c*Y`MS �F flMCj f�l-93tZrth�-2�47h-9Y� LO £'rs 1b.1'� �34„ a
j�� � 2� Btr�2ness Forrns 6 f�icctg Sr1-43a'�tc1-S+St4-°,SN 14 is 48.3� I'`-
za -�A-ttr.rs2-r�ess-farms-d-ficctg--�'�-- --Yd9-�Y3�-¢e7'0-7�T+----- ---W-�s —2�r2� .
129I 1s Sus2ness Fcrms A frccrg 8�-43C�-2Y+3-2� W L.� 98. 4S �as;- �
13OI ]0 Pcrsiivgss Forras t4 licetg 2�-93tZ�¢�-dR`r¢�-6th fA �s 28. Sr9 �a`'�`
G^t
37 ^�i
�S+ __.____.-------� -��__-��.------------------------- --- -- 299.99 {a:!.
32 T��tass 7emp Ctteck hJumber 2N �n'� t
33 a_'
34 �.____ '_�.__._._._._'_-____.__—____"_--"_..__.__...__..._._ �.'__._ �_. ._"___ ` ----r457
35� Tem¢ Cf�ecK taumber ] 1 i<a�
��
—�Qt e'l3'S—iEJll�7 —�.:i'i
9emp IIheck 1Vzrmb�r
2 •c
.2
Z�
1'.3 �amm2 s51 ansr' af 7t��pt 8�2 -4sy19 -3�2-�2
ia_ ...__..._ ..___ -
Tatals Te?tn{7 Ct�ecH M+1mt�er Y�
�a-f Yracfc-tOtrmb�r----�y 3 . .---
33 �cvnmercla2 L4s{shait
23
Tata25 Temp Dheclt ritumber
Temp LYrecfc Number 44
4 ri
8�1 -99'c�i -t'£�3Qr-�QM
23
-Qr2--433+N-4 fit2-L�
r pr-�
39. L-•1
:�63. Q�
�63. �
�?7r. Qi@+
)
, 1"��____ __. _� _� _ _ "��� . _..__'�._
....�
�
fi SSec 193ic'� Cia3ms L]st
� Cre�-1-:N7-AM --- �-- - •---- ---- - - - --�---- - - - -- �- -C1 ty aT Mendota Hel ghts --'--� -----
2
3 Temp Ct�ecic Nzrrabe�^ 2.:s
. �__"'___.�. __ __ ` _"____""_' '"_'_� """ _'" '_. _. . ' ' _' " _ "___'__"'__.
4
5 7emp.
I ,, iheck
I
'__._ _ "_ ��.�__�_'.��`__"__ �. _ _"__.�._"..��`_�_'.....__.�.«._.�_.-�.���`_-___'�1
{
i�`BCjt 3 i
'--------- --'---'--•--•----._..--------•----'-----------_.�..�-----
rr�
�ol
_.._"'_" _ "_""""' __.. . ._...._.._____ .... __._.____._'____"�_ "_ -•--._..__,1.4�
iCe
--f7uarber-venvu>^ l+Jame -�-- - -- - ._ _ - --- -- Rcc�.aunt �c.de -- - -- - - - -- ._ ...-.•--- Cc*mments --�------ ---�---- ---- _ ----.�.----�--Rmounti ----------------=f;
� �i
9 � 23 ?tevl i� IItrster 4�1 -�Y337-4r3rD-�SQ+ trapp2 ng svc 369. r:.fi i»
�. _._�___"_' """_" .. . _ 71�
_`_ _"' _ '" "' ' __'_" ".» "' '
''O " "'__ "'"' __' __"_"'�"_'"__ ._.._."'"'_'_'___—__'_'�"�__..�___
n, 23 369.z'6--- - •--------•-�-,iui
��� 4'atals Ternp �hecfr Ttumber 1�+ ��si
•-'-•------ -------- --- . .. - •- - --• --- - --- - - ..
_.._. - -- --- --• --_-'.. ... .-- - -'----'-- �_._�_. �_.:� I
73� .�..__._._._.. ' "_'._ "_'•" ____ '_" _ _' .-'__,..._._�.__'•'_"' 1_
14 Tem{s �riecl< Nttmber 16 � �
���i .
�5� j7cl,
ic B--Ca{.xy-Qctp]scatsng firaducts----f�2-43Y+E�-�h�-�------- --_.__..�.-------capses- -------------•--------------�4:39�------------------•-�`�;
-- Y__ �
n :_::
�Z t' �- 9. 39 f.._, �
i e I � �.
Tota�s 7Pmp•CT�ecK-Mumber-------25�------- -_-_-----•-•-•---_.__ ---.__.._-------,^,- ------_._----------- --------^-��i
^9I - ��r!
0 ' '
i211 iemp Chec)r lVumber 17 'z7:
.
.
„�
------------•-------•------------...------------�._.�. ----------------��------------___..__----�---- ----'---------------._-�._
z2 - ..�.
�s 2 7 �arcc.r�an Nd►v� ¢.] -4338+-49¢r-7N sQ] ys tiSt_ ?S+ (aai
24 2 7 Carcora�� Hdwr QrY -4330-fi3¢e-7� s{sl ys 67. IIr9 ��t
IzG 39 --�._.��-----------------•--------- ------- ----�-------------�----�------•--�------�------I�h7.tA4---'-----^----�--------i;�i
iZ� Tatals '?'ernp ChecH Number 17 ;�si
--------�c'
;za� ---------- --------•------�---..._- _--•------------•-- -- --__�--------_�___-_----------------- a�;
�291 Temp �!-�eck Mumber 2 c'1
� i,(:
(32� �6-Cem82s-1��i.4•-----•---- Q+5-43it�Q�-3E�-1✓ - ------•---------s�skys -- ----------------Ab^tb9---__---- ----- —;�r;� '
::�
;42� �
33 1e _'_____—_'_.__."_____ �__ _ 65.t�8 �4=i
;�a,
ot�ls-remp-Etiecx-ltlumbel^— —2�0------ •-------- ------- -- '4;
� �A j
35) ' .�
I36' TE+mp Check t4umber 9 y .. . iG�.
___�""___�."'_'! —'__'__""_.'__."�""____—� jt�,�
29 .Farnes Dan2 e] �ca»
-99� ------- -
Tat�25 ten:{s CT1BCH Nttmber^
L�fi Def1n2 S .6e1 ma»L
—'t"'Q�—l32M1'12'S-'}SE33 MQJ?�
4a'r
—�'ot a S�s•-7�m{s--�OhL cH -7�umber - -
Terap £.f�ecl< Mumbei^ �1
L9 F2Qistcne �absneCry ir,c
-i] —��_�T,._r_
Tata25 ierup Cri�:ck Mctmbel^
, $+5-49]�-Ith'3-S`3
19
Dec a21ow
�2 -441 �-Qr�-� fSec ai 1 aw
02--993tb-F24t.''St �ze----- exp--renmb
tb1-42 32 -¢r�-2¢+
E2
•�� ?=2rst Fnterstate L+a»k Trustee �2-��y1
Re Oar1 ocfr
Dec prer�
�: 1
t�
�CE:
�`�J�
Ir::��
i:�
iHt
;3�
ro�. '� ,
rt�
� �;
� -�-----� �.— — ----
-- -- --- - ---- -- - - - - -- - - - -- --- -- --- -� - - ------ -- --__ --.--._.___.__ _ __. . -
�
_,
9 iiec 19J¢+ �2alms L
I� -Ti7.E+..41:Q�7 FtM _.'-.-------" ----------------�- -�-""- �lty at--f�le�rtdot
iZ
�3 Temp �heck 1Vumber t2
.�r.._.�_.._,_._..____ "'._._'�_."._._._�'._____"_""—___.__..__
�4
� �Ei1i�l�
i � I ��� Checx
,�, �tvE7mueF= vennor Tvame ----- --------- - --- ---- ---Accc,amt �aae -• ---- - - --
�al
��I £�L f'lrst Inte�^state Pai7H Trirstee 01-H231--Q+�c.'�E�-�
'�o :.ti F��"iNst"`S'ntet^stat�-Panfc-Tt^etst�e."'.0�=9*31-@34+=��+-----
'��' c� f2rst ii�tcrstate Bai�H 7i^crstee 0]-ri231�2+I0-7'�h
i1z;
13 H�-------------- ------ '-- - - • --•.�` -- - - - ---�---- ._--- ---. .
14 'fota]s Ternp �hcck fVumber �
�15
�16 era{rCn"Fatz-tatTmr:er---'_�i� _�.__ �.___. _.__�_.-'_-'_...,_
,�
��ai, 9£+9sccm oP h12nn Srrc Q+2-4338'-49fh-i-�S+
��; c3�3-scc�m-aY'�Mirn�-Inc'----..-_--.�—_Qti-433¢r-44�2-�1--------
'� ol � '�3 D] scam c�T }+3t »n I rsc YL�� -4338+-46�-3�
27 , 1?3 Ti2 sCCVi7 af t+lS �7t� S»C — t�2 -43'JQe-452�-37+
22I 3"�tScem7 c.f�T279»-Srtc-•-- —�t'�3-933i1e-45$-38E--------"
�Z3 �?3 }S2scam at M1��r1 Si�c �2-933IIr-44¢r-�'+¢+
�2a1 �3_ i31 scam oP fn] »ri I ric ----------- 8�S -H334+-96�= SQi- --- ------
1 ti2
Tatal s 7emQ �heck JVz�mber �3
F�u�p �hec3c Mtrmbei^
i�4
--T�tal-s-semp-�n
T�asp �Y�eck Ncrmber
.,
i
��`•
1 st P�gc 9 �' �
B"Ne2g17ts--------------------- --- --- - ---- -- - •-- -._. . _._..��.---.�.._._._..i i
' � � s �
-• ---- --•--� _.�---�-------- -------------`------------------'--------- —,-1-�
1�
�V �
I � }
� �:
-- -----_._----�Cc�mments--•-- --- -----,---�----- -�--- -Amau»L---------------_..___.__..__._�_. �.
, � r,,�.
t3ec (srem fi7_ 97 '' �"�
tz;
---- -------}SeC-'preM'---- ---------- ---------',-�_7:'13�--•---------•-;fa'
riec prem c2. �� :4.•��
----..�_..__�..----- ---•----- ------ -^ - --- --. ..-�--3Y6.S�8------------ --- ----- -- --- .s
. ,
��,
'�li
--------- -----•--------------------
--`------ �__��_ .-:
�'"� i
>-g,-� ss. a�a� �'�,
�. � 7^ jJY`S-T--'--- --99:''J�Zt _—`—� �:
rprs 31.3� �ze!• �
rprs ' 32..:rtZe �Z�'
tc�
_.-• _ ---rprs-----'— - 3� _ �--- •• --- ...
r{srs 47.3m •ac! ,
rprs 33. 3'3 3 � :
------��.� _-�-_-.--- ---- �-- ---��._ _.__..��
, � 33'�.59 "a', .
• ���i
.��-- - --- ------------ ----• Y__._�i
i� �:73�'
i•'.
. �4,
— 4r4-93�-tZr,=`S+-�Y+—_.-----�- -sp]ys ---36.-QrQ�-- �1�
�__ �a�� �
36_ Q�Q+ �ac�
i✓
. L�S fl��crcfyear 5erv2 re Store
_'� - ��_�.
i'ata2s 7emp �tiecFr tvumber
rm{7-Ct�ecfc-Nermber-- -L'�6-
2S tluad►r.f2] Irrdastrlss Irsc
a�� -�ss€k-9v�n-�
E�
fh9 -4'�E9-tb83-63
26
tate2s T�mp �t�eck 1Vumtrer �6
'!'�mp Ct�ecK fVconber^ Ly
� 7-flopher-tltiy-tf-9he�t-t•leta3----8�] -493�-:}2 �-gT
2? 4ctpt/er f-!tg ti 9t�eet Metai L2+]-1r338-33�-74t
L7 flapher Htr3 t� 9rieet f�leta] 18-433�-320-6Gi
�2
Tatals Tenrp �hecH itlumber 27,
, 7'�mp �hecH lOumber^ i3&
»�.�
i4b
� I4£+ �
- -- -- ---- --
1'p>^5 3.",=tii 131i� StI �50�•' )
�__�_ u7 i
- -.� ..-------739.-ati— - -i.31
i�; ,
;a ,
Uct svc
:.a"'..r3. +@2t
c""...r3. �
2 93. 3�
9 93. 30
ti3S�. �¢+
�
, , . .__ -- - - -....--- -- -_�_------ ,..___.__-----�--- ----•--�-- -- - ----- - � ----- - -----__._--------�
r-- --�
� ,
i�.
� 9 itec 1992a ' L`i�xms Ltst P�gg � �
ij'i" U�'"27:Q+7 f�M.. � _ .. _. . _.__ .. .------�2ty^ a?'-Mentlaxa�?-le2gtrts.._._�_._....... .�___..__—.---..__�__...__.�.......__.____..._,..�� ...�-�--------t';t
�
2 � ;2
�.� 'FA_M{3 LYlE+CSf 7+}tiMG2N iL'1 t� i
..� .. _ -.� .....____'__...'___'_"_'_' ' __'_....,»_"__, _.._.�_w....�._'_.�..._"�_,..�_""'�_'__'i__'—_—_•___—__.�.�_�_v.^,_�.........__..._-._._....._._�.
�-�.—.•----.____ ____.- -- - - �- --- - - - ;� i
'fern{s_ i '' 1
� y � £#'secH _.., _ � ._...,. __.. ..-. _._...__ �? +
�G
r""i Nt7pltacr�Ykat�dc.Y' Name .__ _ _. . _ __. .- thG'G'�zutr't ooae �-- - _ .___ �....�__.......__..__._.,_.�Cc.mments ----..___._�..._.___.__,_-- - - -Rmc«.�nt----.-.- - .y.
!' ( ;c,t-�•.
$ . .
1�! � ----^ ._,.
}t�j_-""'-i8--__._._.._-_'_ ' '-- --, - " - .'- ...-- _ ._ _�....__. ._____�.__._.__..��._----_---______�_...�--'_ ____._�......_-...__._..._..___...__.-----_._4IIr: 7'S�-----"----__..._�_-__.__�.._ _._'�^�
'17� Tata2� 'femp Ctiectc Nurnber �0 �t�'�
, ,• ; ;
�
,52� .._._"_" .�_..__._..._...�_..� �_...._. _�—.__'_—__..__.."' _"_'__.,._'"___.'.....__._......._._.__.."___. __""'_,...___'_.�'_'_'__ _�.�___.,_.__'�.'.,
�� "-9'emp �'�.ti�+Ck JVctmb�r -- --� - - �}9 -- ._ .._ _ ... _ _ . __ .�._,_ . _ a n
"k� �
14
�'�'3 S t? 5 '��-�i3ttrQ+-1a€T�-x8+ splys 3i5_4rti� ±�"�
t 5 i ?�t�
_�._�_�_.��__.__�_ -�-----•�--�--�- -----8i1-44�QR-1Yr9-�t1+9�......�------------ rnpler-mtcn__.._.�__�_.._.---..._.-----fB.EQ+�.__ _._�.�__�....__. ;,
�
�� L'3 .f D 9 8+2 -933R+-45¢i-� ¢� ccapA er^ mt cn 73. 7£'� �`�; �
;j$ £9 S t� 9 8s2-iiEBB-t2t0�-�� cc+p2er mtcrz 2.8@+ �"�F
7J
-La'9-�_tS .g_»-____....-_..__.----_ ._�.__�.___E�2-433fh-+t6¢r-3¢.-_....�__......___ __..------ttn�rler--mten._.��__.� _..��#3r$Q+�. ._. �-u �
I2o �9 S iS 5 ¢+3 --933+2r--94�-+Yt7r capr,t ei^ mtcn Z 2. Q»`�t {`o� ,
y�y r."`3 F i! 5 4�9 -a99�-�S8►-brh � cop.t er mtcn _u �ts• �¢+ _.�___. _�=�:,i
� 9-Y-Et -9 ----.__._.---._._.____�_�---....��.tt+5-933ttc-99t2t-1� -_..�._.__----.- --caprtcr-mtcrs----- -32:-8k'+�----
,3 L}3 .f D 5 Eb5-433�-�n2+Q�-� c�:�p3 er mtrcn s�_ 9H •'sc� ,
2a� "`� S Lt 9 2+9-94�Q+-�2t¢u¢+--�tt� cc'ples^ mCc» 4.7fte Y �. ('s�;
a^3-S_.f3-�-._..-_�___..�.��,.._..__--_-��--433fe-ti9¢+-Sth---- ----crpt�r-�rrtCcn�..-___� ____ ----45:1'8�-- . -"�.
��G ' ...__ i �,__.-.» �� , �
�.,�319 ._._� _ �. �""'�`ri.69 i_� - _ �3u�
----I
�� '�°ata3-s-3�rap-f:treck-�#umber-___.._ --�g----- ,.;,I
� ,_e
�29� i�mtt �.tsE+cic taumtser^ 3� i`3� ._:
3it+ 2'L.fdFv ' Se,�-4fifr,?:-32fi-]@
....�s a�.... �..� __.-__..��_..._ ��..._'-----_.��_
7ata2 � 7emp �Aeck 1Vcrmber
rti�3'sec`}t-hJutr�trer�_-----._ 3�
34 � C M fir R' T
-s_X—ri�e.s_LS..__.R T
3t27i
Bt� -�c'St7:�'
-- - - -- -- - - tZ�i-9334-11d+-Y2e
6'.y.
--'3'ce�-al s-`femp-CYzec}c-J�4crmber------.__-34 --- -._.,...- - ».._.-
Terap �heck lVumber 3E
3;� iaaul ttc�.tsei^ 8+#-9•�S&•-2�-30
3£ fictu2-?i2r2set^ i��—v�-�__fh�-992�r-�¢+32��".St2�
B4 '
Yotals5 Terdp �heck JVumber 3��
T�ra{s '�lft3cH ritetmber 33
33-!ic"tt-tSEyS --.•,•^.._--�---"'---.-.••.,.^--5�7 -ti3'C+^.S' -tZ'7�r-�'S
. 33
' 7euop Chec�k Number 3A
handtx.csk
2 2 J� 6 g8y+'T'ctl Z
- 31-�d5-pEtjn^c.s]
tvc v svc
— htav m2 ] �age �
�23.3�
-4�1 3r3'�-
�69.L3
--�tt; 4�4-
�53. 6i
2 s ikBYct. lc12+
42.06 _
1���2.86
—�S.-a"4
�1. s-'`_+i
—� '� ,
q�c g99�.+, Clasm� L2st F�age S i
,; _�TCre "72:Qt7 Rt9-�.�---- - -----------------------�Sty af Mei�data Helghts------------------------ - .. ._.....----._..__�. __. . __. _��-------�-� �
�Z ;.. �. )
3 TBAJ�J L'1��C?C fdcrmi�er 3�
:;
"".._.....'__"""_�"_�'�•_'--.__"'__._�_'_'"" ""'_�_"_"""""�-_"_`_"_".'-_'__-_"__-"_�____.__ ..
._'_ _ ._-_'^_ _ "" ' _ _' "' "� .._.� _'_. -�.._ _'"' _'�.."'� _�_' I S �
4
7emp. � `, '•- t
�i; �»��k �-,.
1Vumt�r"Vendc.r 'JVame ---'-------- -- --•----- -- Rcce.unt 'IIaGP -- ----- - -- ----- �-•-----Cammerrts----•-- r---- - - - � -_ ._...� _. .----.frmc�unt -----_�.T_.___.
.:
.�$ : .
�y' 34 ftnax iumber �c'l-433�-+DQi�-d�� sp2ys 9�.77 ��' ^
� 4 TSYJc�R"Ltrmber^'---------.._._.�_�.-�---- ---�-9ri6Q+-fL4fA¢r-tc§2+"`.-------�- ------- �--�p2y5�..—...._----�-------------�---�--�-]S:'13_""--�-----�--�------�:
�� 34 1{nax Ltrn�beT^ m8-�i33�-h+T�--¢+�h sp2 ys Y z�. ¢�¢+ 2�' �
�1z( 39 ?trfc.x itrmher 8�9-933�-c.'k¢�n.'+-�Af� sp]ys 7�.17 �
�t3 --= _=----------- ------. _.... .._._.__ .. .. -'- '----'-------------- -----'- "--� -----•------__..__._^.- ------------- - --- ------ ------ ---'- -----^•-- -- -----� ----- �
�.4 236 . �3�i.Q'9^ •� �
15 Totals 7c>mp �treck 1tlt�mbei^ 34 '�'
------• --------------.._.._.__._._..-'--�- -----------------�._.�-----_...._ �--------.. .�. __-------'--- --•------�-- ----------------...--`-----"'.--;C�-
16
i�� T�mp �Y+�cX JVcttabe+� 3:, ,
tE� �
1e 3-7Snutscrrr�TruGL2st3��9�rv3c�----•—Y�8-933�-Qrf'n¢+-�---- ------_--TVcv-�vc—. ----_---�.--- '�9��3�- - -•--;.
zo ,'��' �
zi
3:1 �5. :33 <, .
zz ota'5-5�7'emp�£riecH�T!«mbe�^��.-----•-3��-----�-----�------------------._�_- -•-- ------�---�- . -- -- - -
+,23 '�t I
�24 Ternp GYtech Nt�mber 36 � j�'
(2� - --- �------.�_____._,---�.-....�.__--------------- - ----- —• ��._.��.---- - -- --------L I
zs �s 7 M tSeai�»ey Eonst Ync rZr9-9�46tZ�-�ih-tc►¢+ Re 89-6li 3t}B+,H�Qf "4� -
i�� -- __ I;j,
28 —� '---"-----._.�.__..--- --- ---._. ------ 9ffr&�: L'� — ,�n
iZy Tata2� Temp ChecX Mumber 36 �:F{ �
iJS� -
i30 _-__-___ . . - -�•:O
JCRlfJ i.:(fCL'K JV(fAJL�Cl' J! � - �4i
. :�{2! �
3? ?hcmas lSnctth iZr3-4�3�-t2�&'�pt-�4� m2 r�]mD ji9.2F� ;4i
:a�:�
—3'7-7h'tvn�s'�K�7ztth ��-�4'41�-2¢+3-13--- --- -mY�^�tarb— 9=E4-- �,:�
37 "f?'�e�mas H»e.rtY� �-492�-2Yr�-13 17�c a21aw 2B+.8�2+ �e,! �
_1.��.—_'— �--------•_ ^_-_�.-- — --- - '77:3fi - �A9�
Tata2s Temp �heck ?dt+mber 37 ,co; �
—=9 L £ L 9 _
. 38
7atals Temp �hecK Me+mber
?esrrp �h�cfc Mcrmber 3S
—33-t ea g tf e- aP'-Mn-�9 t�2' �s—
39 Lea.gtre oT Mn �! ts es
—7e
Tata]s 'Temts Check lVermber
--t52'-y.."8�7s►- —
03 -42 'J 2 -4+t?2t�.''2�
39
�i�+ iage>^qu2st �arp 4�8-433S-QrQ��e-�2
Y�-l.-a�gerqu2-st-8ar 8-433s-�¢�¢tQr-QrtN
98t
_ � � ,--�-i
i� �
iiec dues 295. S�Y+ ��c,i .
- - ------- ------ � -1
s 9s. g�+ l,21 ;
nec prem
--
Sept svc
--i}c
9�8. �9
I; ,
•�----• -- - -- - - -- - - - -------------------
�--- ----�-- -- - ------- --- --- �---- ------- -----_.
�
�
� 4 15ec 293¢r C2a2ms L1st Fag� 7
�,-,-•fue'�s.�7-AM -- ---- - --. _. __.. _� ._--- ------•-_-Ctty at Mc>ndtrta-Nelghts•------__.��.----•
z
!3 Yem¢ �tiec3c Ncrmbei^ �3
� ---`---'--'--------' -' ---'--- - --•--' . ..---'----'_"-----•- '--- ----------------- --.�"-----------------------------------'
� I Temp.
j�f �Y7tCh
I
�r-iVornt�er-1�e»dar i42me -- - --- -- - - -- - - --- fiiccw:.unt- Ccde� -----• -----..--------Comments------�------------�---------•--Rmount-------------
��I
s
i 9 4] M Thamas l.3we2 1 L}7Y -44 i�-•2 � t2+-3 �7r lYec a2 2 oW 1 Y�. 8+th
� _ ._...�.__. . _ _ . ._ - -•- '--- -� --
- _--___. ._.._.-- --'-�-�---�-'---------'-----'---- ---'__._--_•'-•-'__-_'-------'-
�ol` 92 _.. '-----�_� v�-.�_.._._
17�. IIni�
' � Yc.C•a25 ?emp �t�ecfc lVcrmber ti1
���
�-3±-___.+-___. '."..._ '.'_' '_"' '_ __ '_ _ _._ .""._......_."_'___..'"___'..._'_.'.'�_'_'__'�.
_.�.._�.._..'_"^'""_'" _'_'____ ''___" __'_''_._".' �_-'.�.'_"_"_'___'_"_.
I� i
'�Gi temp �treck Mermtser AL'
ts�
,���—�9c^-mJetrc�-Wa�te-IIc�ntrol -�-------------2S-44ti9-0b�+-6¢.----�--- ----�------------i3ec-svc.-..-.-----_�_��_�._._.__.33sL}92:74.-_-_.._------
`��I 9t� f0etra W�stc f;antra2 37-3�7� E>ec svc 2� 796.4�9cr
i8 --
---------
(�s -89--� -----�---_-__. r.__.---- ---- .___..__._..----------�--------------�-------�-----�--•---�--------------- 3�i 996�0 ------
Zol ic�ta]s 3'emp �Yrec7r Number 4^
�z,l
;�--Femp-�Ctreck--tduraber-----_._-�.-43-------------._.-----•�-----.-�:--------- - ------------�---------- ------
!
I
23i� ti3 M2 dwest �J�.! 2 dr�ens Resocrire ¢+4 -43�-�-�-2�C� v3 de�� �. �fcr
�2a,
!��; ----------- ----- ----_._._.._ _._.-'-----------------� -----'------- -- ---'-- - ---- ------------- --
)��� 93 L-`8E.4rtA
j,� i'ata2s Temp L`trec3r Numbei^ 43
��:Lt---- -------•-------- .�.-------.-__--___----_ �..--- -�-•�------- --- -- ----------'-- -
� y 'f'em� �hech fVurnDer fisi
�30�
a�titi-�M2�d►rest-•Thota tJvr-----__-.------02-93�"'J-¢�'�2`-� •----_.--�.---.--- Nov-svc•- ------ -r'6: i'K5. —
�32I 49 M1dwEst FtTotCr SVC Q�1-43tb'3-Q+3Qe-3t7+ � JYOv SVC 3Qe.9Qh
33
94 fn3dwest fihcrtic• 3Vc �1-499d�-�8r2r-8Y� Nav Svc 1;=.ti8�
134 ,..._ _ _' ��_""�__'_.'_.______.�_..__._�__'.'_� '— "____
., 13•2 59.8+@
�.,� Tota2s 7emp �h�cfr ritumbei^ 49
Yemp Ct�ec7c fVcrmCer t►� ,
—4�-M�3-Z�r--P�r^=rrt3ng ------•----Y.9 2L23--..—__._
4� Mf22er Fr1nt2Mg i2e1^Y21�
—yi7� _'�"_'�'_'__.��.—.__.___'_..Y"_'.,_'"..."'�"_
7'�-�ta]s Temp ChecJr Nuraber t►�
'tem¢-£flecH-t4crmber---- --46°----- �- ------�
ti6 Jo12 »r� �e.21 trl ar Te2 e�a 8�9 -9���¢+-6] ¢�-�s8+
--45--M3-»rr-Ce2-2-arSal^-Fe3�e-Ca ---•01-92d�rh-62Qt-c^Qy
95 M] nn �e2 2 u 2�r Te] e�a 2+Y -4��S+Q+-61 tb-3t�
(53 Tatais Tera{a �heck Mumber 46
�5a
I55 T�2IA�J-L'hBC1e--MttM1JE+Y`-------,t��" .'__' _„'____'_'
SG
� iii Tf.tMn fKUtua2 L2Te I»S S�2-c^Q�7�?
9-Mi»rr-hltttuar2-l:l-te-3ns -tn7-P2t79-
*..�-. ...� .. . �.. ,.,a
pc,^m3 t t'ai^ms
i3ec svc
---'--33EC-'SVC
f7�c svc
s x�s s pay:-c�� s
ec--prem
1 �7r. 8n7r
fi54;-drt2t—
�_ t3Yr
-9. 9�
6. 73
--99: 58�--
a S+2k. S�¢' ,
---------- �
�
---------- ,'-i
.�
—�-'-�-�-��-'� �, ;
: r,
- ..-.-___�.._.. i n ; .
�t T
-----"------ t•;
.i • '
_ •-- _---�-- •'.I - �
,� .
_' _.__'_-' _"� `^i i
�__,_ .__._' '�
�:u� �
_��_ J�'��
�'�' �
;,T '
-----`----- -���
.ci •
�_.�._.�___''vf5y .
_�ya.��
'^`I 1
!�'�
_ ��°
1�E��
_�
1���
'�__ �=.G�
:sii �
ts�
�l, +
{J�1
'—_ 5��
;�'j
i'£i �
""_'_' "_'_"_""'"_' _""' '"_" " ��.._. �_._._ _"'_.._"_"_"_�'_.___'._.�_'_"_" __.. _ _�__..-.,_.__'_"'___...'_`_""""_ _' "-____\
�
�
-ni ���.
� A t3ec 29''1¢+ Cla�ms L2st -__ �,�ge 8 ;� J
-----•--- ----- �__. _�_-_-_.�_ . _ -__.. - - .-• _' - - - ._.._ . _------ '
� I t7B' Y Y :tA7 saM ��---- --�--- -- - -- - �cs ty �or tdenOata He2 ghts--- ------- ---T-7
� I�:'�
.z i.. ,��
3 Y�mp C?�ecfc tVumLer +�7 �
al
_-.___—_�_�____'___'.___'_'_._ "..��__.'�._'__"_""'__ '."'"__"_-_—_—_'__'�.��_�__"'_"_'.___..__._"�"'���.._�___��.____.�'._'_,_�__ '_'�j.'�
4 �
Temp. ! � ';�
� � �heck , 7
7
a7mner^"Ver�dar.'?Y��ne -----------•-----flccc.unt-�ade--.l.__.__.._�_-,-----,------Cctmme»ts----•------•--- - -� ----- ---�-----�fimora»t-'---- --------------�+;,�
B ?rr�
�47 M1»i� f�lzrtu�l L3Te ins 01-9Y31-Qr�-£'Q+ i?ec prem �.2Ye �.
------.... _.__-`--' -------------------� ----------._,r.---•-��
��0 4T�M2'»»-YJifteia]-i2le'-1'n"s------•- �2=4137=Qe7'8�-7iti'--•---------'-..._'�'"_�."-"FSer"pi�erif----- -- - y.'?4F--'-"- ��•.�
, � � � �_ ------ �I � � ?
I�z, 13J 1i7� i'fi '� I
-- ---- --,-'--------��.- --
ia� ata'4 s-Temp CTrecH- htermber �- 47 ---�-•----�--------------__ . .- - ---- �---- -- ----�-• --- -.___----- -- --- ____-_- --•--...- ----- _�
r14! �`I'')
I ,._
�s 7emp Cn�ccfc Ttltrmirer^ 49 "�
z
--------------•-------------._.-..____�._----------..�..._��_._---•--------------- ----.._-_._._.-----------�.�.�._.__.�...�---------;
��� '
��� �45 M2nnesata £+ertef2t Rssn 5+9�,�Se79 23¢:c premti •�6c.29 -%�..-�
�� 4B ft2nnesota itPneflt rrssi� t¢i7-4232-Y2�-10 }�ec pi^em 1£�2_6Y7r --- -i
�s 9-'M27�rfesc+ta--Pe»ef2't-fissrr-------•--2�-4134-25+3-23�-------------•-------i7ec-prem---------•----------31i✓:42+---------- �•
20� 'i� M2 nnesat�r Renet'! tr F}ssn 8+1-4! 32 -tE�c'�¢+-,t"�Ze }]ec prem 996. 7iCr �^c,i ..�
• :
Z� 8D J�t2 »nesata Se»ef2 t f7ssn �+2 -9Z 31-0✓@-f`iY+ Fiec {srem 1 Q�9. 89 ��''
Z., 9-M3nnesota-�Penet3t-Assn-----------¢+1-9�31�-Q'+70-7tZ+ --- -- ----}�ec�rem---------- -_-.--99:94�--�-�-•-�- ----------•--??�I
i23� 46 M1»nesata �+e»ef2Y fiss1� ]'5-4232-0b�-6Y� lSec prem 223.3$ �i��
za� -- ----- �s'�
; =; �
-------------------_'-_--------.__._-_.._.---�_�_.�.-.------------- ---�-------•----
z5 3fJ ' -_..�-,i�8i99: 38-- -•----'--- 1
(Z� 7ata1 c 7emp �t�ectt tdermter 9H �aa�,. �
';,i, t
27 ;V,y�
za ern{a-C»�cx-racrmber------�i3----------.-_ __.--•- -- _ _----------•— - ---• .�-_-•-_•--------•-�- ---
... i
..,, i
�29 !'�I�' Z
'�30 93 fd2rsnescta ?eamstes^s ic�c 3c'`Y� 81-��73 13ec Dues ,^_23.�nZe �"I'�
- - -- - - ---- ----- - - - - - �<ot
43
FataSs Tem{s �hec3c tVumber 99
Temp Ct�ecfc Number^ �S+
—�-?durr-�G3b,g-- -- ---&r
."i0
—'Yzr�1s'Framp--�hec?c�tV «nTber--�----�--�4+
F�tnp ChECh tY[trobet^ vy
T] -9ti¢+E�-rZ+92t-48�
32 NaT^th 9ta>^ Cf�apter IL`£+U
7ota2s 7emp �t-iecic Mcrmber 3Y
✓,� 1Vczrther» 9tate L`c+wer
�?-lvortrherrr9t�r t e-f-`ower
✓2 fve�rx�e>^rr 9tate Pc.wer
��� t6art�eri7 3tatre fiawer
�'-Noi^ther»-St at � -f�►ver
�r^_ Narthei^i� Stabe �ower
:r2 lYarthern State ffawer
��!'� mtrg
22 3. Q+S�
9� �ti9, t7�
3II�. S�Br
Sr1 -4�y 2-39 �-�8� SSG c svc ' ' 13Y4 :37
d�7-422�c-31tn-:SY�-- — l7ec-svc----- "39:-'�2.
�1 -9',�2 s}-31 Q+-78+ flec svc E2 +�i. �1
73-4L�ic-•31¢�-fi�7r ber_ svc E14. JL
tk1-4;?�L-3L�Qe-7'N- ---- vc-- ----272:63-
S+S^�+t=2Z-¢�+B@-� t)er_ svc 4g+8.99
13Y -921 1-SS ✓-30 Dec svC ' ' 'JY 1. 3Y�
�8-4�,s22--tir¢r¢+•-2r¢r— : Qr9t7r�-3�
,�__, ---- - - ----
- --- ------- ---.__..------ ----- --------- ----\
� • - - -- - -- -_.--- ---•---------------�------------- `
� '> ��' ��� �2alms ilst fia � 9 �^�
f; Tue'-7Y:07�-i}M--- - -- -- - -- ---- --- ------- --._-----�lty a�-Mendata-tfefghts--- —_--------------------------� ----------------�-, �
�Z � �
j 3 Tem¢ Ct�eck fdumfaer^ �� i�,� }
I -----------._�____- ---------
4 - ---__------- ------------- -----•----�.._
� 7emp. �.. _�__.__ -- ------------------------____---...- -; �, �.-)
���tlech -___.� _.r. ------• ---• , ! � �
7Vtrmber-Vendar tVame -- --ficc��urrt �aQe--------___,.--.--__.._��IIamme»ts----•--_____�.-.�------ -Amaunt�----------- ie'
t 7 '__"�' y I
e � ("'i
�9�
.`33£ )0arther�� 9tate 3-`c.wer 2�1-4�?12-3�'+¢�-�¢� iSec svc 3tJ9.E3fi ;��'"-�
���! "�i'7doT^th2J'» t3xBtB -L`Cr►ve7�___�._..._"""_'$�1-4�21-4i'Qr_3tA'_' -�_-__ --ibec'-svC���_�..-�'__"_'__�_�2.:n?: b@" _._�'_'__""'_�_.-_' __
��, 3r'� fVartheJ^i'r 9t�te fiawer trid-1icY 1-�4�+�-�Z+ L}ec svc 8�c^. 93 ';�'�•�
�7z :r2 tVcn^t»errr �itate Paaver^ tny-4;�12-3��`8�-?8+ f3ec svc �r2�.5] "�-�
.��------- - -- - -------- -.-.� .�_ ----- -.�_.._._._�...�___._.�_-�----- ----------•--- p �
73' �"'__.'._.�_._"._'__"___.._"_,�_'_." _____.'-___."'___•"'.._�_. .._�."'_' "_
(�4� 6'24 9�Y49'�.2@ ;.
��.
I15i TQtcl25 Temp �hecH fdumber :JZ j7v; �
;e� :
" ____'-'__�"-'___ __�_ _____�.___._._'__'_.��-_.._�__""_�'_._.�- _'^_'__._'_" '�._'"'_.___.--' -.
7G __"`. _�.'___._
'� � Temp IIhecic fYumbe+r �3 �;,�� ,. �
,78 __.
It2 =�3�-Wc•rthern-State Pawer -------•-----3:,-4;31 3 -9d�8e-5Q�-------------flec-�vc------ ----- 24+:1r78�--- - •-- -- --=
�Zol �J Martheri� 9tatc S-`awer t7+9-446�h-�hrZr--¢+¢e 3Yec svc 235.7�t ;Ei
--- - ; i
�21 f -___-- :='';
�_�'�.__'_-"_�'_'___"._'.� "_"'_�"_'_. _`__"_'�'___�_ '��" _�__'�.__ %7:'
�_Z - --------------------------39;s.-�8- ------------- -;
2 Tata]s Ternp �hech Number 33 _ �`.;��
lc I� �;
,��-'Femp�-Chec)c-Mumber----------- S9 �--�--------- -------- -- �- � - --------- ---•---
�ti L�e3cer�est Kent+e] s Q�2 -4;:��2 -68�-90 ' Nay gve t 9Qr. �Ze
—:54-�E7efecr�st-He»»e2s---.-_�__�-__.@i-4:��''�S-B¢�¢+-9fR------- Nnv-sve..-- ------ 324:+Z�
7 a�e
E"34. 2rt2t
—3ota�-s 1'emp-Checfc ?Vumber�- ---------��,q__.._.__._,.�__-----.------- ----- --- -.--- ---
"iemF �eck htumber ��
:!� �xygerr S�>^v2 ce Cc.
� L+xygsi� 9ai^vtce LR
1 2 4R
'iata2s 1Qrnp �Y�eck JVamber
Ye7 -43�-N.f8�-�2+
�+Y -4�N�-tn3T-3¢+
3✓ ,
act tfit-u s yls3
act thi^u 1111�
2 3. :,Q�
Y 3� 6Sr
£7. ¢+tF "
Temp �trecN tVumber 56
--56-Frev -PPQ2 T-fer------ ----Qe2-4fi2 0-¢�"✓Q+-� ----- --ex{s-r�.tinb - - 2 b0.-�
:,s �
1 �Q�_ �Re
F2*Csr3 s �'em p -�tiecH-1V etniber —
?emp �hech tVermb�r^ :.r?
37 Fla�a T9i^� !F 5Vc
�7 x`2 az� T� re a 9vc
]]4
9'ata75 7ernp Lheck Wumts�r _
Temp ehers� ftlumber �0
¢�x —93�a�—y�¢�—�
Y+2 ^933Qr942+-x?2+
37 ------ - -
t 1 i"�s ;=2si�9
t 1 res r.''L 4P
� 2c.i.8$
` 2 �"2. A8
E'4�. 76
� ~� �i
��' f
i5:,1 �
i
— =�=;
ly � �
ia^i
+._�
�_.n.�
•4c��� 1
?
)
�'�:I '
s.
,C0y1
� �c�l
G"'�
�'GG ii '
_���i
iG5�
i�" l
�E7'
`� i[8�
i�y�
I °� .
— --- I ' �
7?
��7'Si
���,
,__i :
� -� ----._
.. ��
�.:R�. Y+¢�
--__�..._�.... _- - ___._..._�_._._...__...._�..� �_f_��.... _ _..______--•---...----- _ - --___.�_-._� ----- • --•.._._�. ..--_.._�• • _- � -,-------�--�- - - -._ _ .------ --------- -- -----•-------�-
0
r
d
£� '£�D F
£S'.=£+D L
C+8'E0L °£
09 'S-2•£
4d{A '3cZa3 � I
CG=GL-i—
�II£ '££ F
+D�3 't£�
+Z+ L-B6 F�—
�1A� '�'b ` L
J�19 i10M
JA� AU�.j
wa A��
ans nopt
J+�3 +U.�.{
�ns_.naAi
ans noN
�L�� .
..ts'
� .��es�
�Eib�
ri' __..__�_'_��_'��r.si€_...__�'____—�.__.�'_'—�—_
., vi -�_�_�
•��yl �D�3 "�3L� � S sa C.tv�a�..t iF a ia�toai
r>r� --- -•---------- ------�----•------- --
` `�;ry; .
�' ----__ -_"_'__�'�'_._—_-'_—_._
.�.,�
-+; ;E! _ 39 'E�3£
� .,. �� ------
.��I
±--- L6=L �---------------'--•
:is
• �9s� �9 '+B�Z
� 'be� 6�'iA •
�_F, ------ ----66�'9Ei------__._..._------�_��.
izej
::s i @4 '�9
� f�::i pi:.' L L
tEt`--------'---__-�-.-'-------•-_..�..-��-_-'._- _. ..,'-------------
� !r.-�
!;�.f --------'---------9+$'42.g ..�._._ �_.�-- ----- -'-
E- ----�--
t�t�l __�..___...�_-_--------_�$�d'trs•^F-----"'-------_-�-�"--
, ,'---
ir,p
i- ':L+
:i �
�.r, r t� 1at2� '6�
�
1.-. ��---------------------_-------- ---'--- -----
: t� +A+B'6�
��J. ` ,
t�'
'-�� F------ �.__ _ ---- -�unour� ------------ - ---------- ---
�� 5!------- ' ------------_-____-�---__ ___._----
t,�r' ..' �
t�..._.---_ _,._ ..�- --� --
- -- - �- '- --. ._ __- - -- -_-- '--- -'
^ , �D t a6e�
..I
l,
�9 - -- ..raqwnAt �t.�a43 cturay -
-..+a qurn �_�a r�.�iuta �,-s.
49 • �
95�
+B,_�-+Bz�D-�3�M- F�B----�- — a t�tt�.�L6-69
69 ..[aqtv��tJ Haau� dura,y
E9 •.�a4wiZAt �SaauO dtva.t �teao3.
itrb
+71+2+-z � F-�8-2.�6-9 L A `.« .Cssauu8neu6 3 i E9
+D+D-3E i-+D..'Y26-6 L ..�1� �Lssauct8ner� 3 'i E9
��-� £-�-+R2-�b--.C-�_._----.__..i�eCssauc�8ner1��-1 £9
+a+8-3E L-W..?.�ib-E�D ..r.{� �Tssau+l&ne+�6 3 -t E@
+D9-� £ F-�D.�<-!b-� C .<C iissaui{8ne4S 3 "i �S
�i-�i-+D�36-�- ---- ..r.r�issauctFiner�����-£4
+Dt-.?EC-�BcZc•6-S�D .<C itssau[tB+�e�J6 3 T £4
` -- -
�.g „raGwl�pt NJatta dara{ sieau,j,
------- ___- ---------------- -__ .--- ------ � `3-
�B-Cr,.'9-63�6-L�R 6uS3+-�t,.c.� u��xaS �9
-----_ _._...---•------------------•------ - -----��— .—
39 ..raqurnpt N.�act� dwa.(, eE
Z£'
-•---------- -_.�._---- ---.__._.._._._,_..-----._.�..-_`� --------- _ia+�arioAt- �taau3--dara;s.[�.Ar�,�^ ie�
r,}q� oe
___ 6Z�
----sitids -------------�t-�fi-+D+A£6-C+D...-- --..�-----,s�.�nPo.,��a�_F.i.1Q_.4-"U-S.--� az
s.Ctds �d9-976K+-�+7!'Etr-t+3 s�antk�.i,� aaiddEi 1 44 S L9 . cz
siCtds � Rit-�IIii-W�II£6-t+2r s�ae�Av.,r� aat.i,iC� .L '� S T9 ez
- ------ s�Citls.------�----...._._._.__ C.[-�+3[-+Il�B£6-L'aB--•----� ---�---s4.�nPa.t¢_a�Gd.FC1-i-=Y-S--t �z
s�Gtds +D3-�UL-¢uIlC6-i:+II s�anPu..r� a.�T11C3 .t 9 F. TB yz
s.Cids �t-C�71i-eZ�+nFb-�+B S�JR�7.i� a.�[id0 3 4� S F4 ez`
__ __. _�_'�.��__'_�____"_�._"___'_"'._'-'._..._. __."__ '_'_ �__" -' ZZ
i9 ---------- ..rac[u�nAt �taact3 dara.t �z
oz
- ------�� �-- --._....-__-----.._ - - ------ --------•----'z"-� -. ._. _._ _. _ ..[a4arnPJ_�taact3. dara3,._s_i.e3o a�
a� Is�
ILL
_.__,"�.s�Crds_----------------------'a�-+S£+�1-�+8�a-C�B--.....___�._.u��caaa�o.�a__a.<s�_.ta@�te�a y�
L
+Z�9 ..ra4tvi7� >taar.ta dwat v�
-----. _.__.--------------•--•- --- -.._.__--------- - --- -� --- - ------•�-•- ----------- --
et
� .ra4w»At xaact� da1a�, s�elu,{, zL�
�� t t
-•---------- -------- -------- •-� --- ---------._..�_ ..- - - --. _. . �_. . � __ _-----'-'--------- _-�- ��I
wa.rcf oaa 6I_4a�-[eA ersslFf 3atJ idar� .�iTRn� 6� �6
B
--._�sAt+auwlu�--------..___.--- ---- ----__aPoa �unwaE!•-----• --- -- --.-- ---awaAt_.<nPuah_.�a4arn � .
�t.�at.�3 �
-dwat S
� _.... ._�. _..'_ _" � " _v._.-'" �"�__'�._..'_"' _'...'__"_ "_" '. V.�. " " '.' __ " __"_'__'_"._._..__.�. d
� ..raqvmu �t.�au3 +3++��1. E
z
--- ------ ------_-�----.s4ct@ Tal{ eauPcra�_ 1u �C3 i3 . ----- --.---.-- ---- - �._.__�___-4JEf._L�= L.L__a �
asrz sarr�ra +�s�t �aa �r _
+----•-----� - - - . . - - --- - . .- -- - -----------------�_..�_------ - --- -------��-----�•--------�------ ---_..___ _
( '�
; f
��
� 9 Dec 953� II]aims L1at fiage 22 �' �
f
r��'fue-2-2-:¢+7-l3P?------------ -.__.__.-- ---------£2-ty-af-Mencfota-H�S�ghts--- ----- -- -�«_�.-- - - ----T-.ri
f I
2 �= I'fl
3 TemF �t�ech Number ES ! � � .
- --•- --._.�- ---•�----------_��_» __�._ _._��--- � _�_-._ .;`��
4 J . 5
iE 1TT j.T' � fi i r-1
�Gt�ecx _ --- ---- ---------- --- ----, � 1
� Ocrmbrr-Verrtlar Marne -- -- -F#cc��ernb-�ad� -------.-�------�c*mments----_------ --Rmaernt-- ;_yJ
g ( ' `''-i
jy 63 3atrthvlew £hev @iY-93:i¢�-490-z.'�ri parb Ei.49 92.6�h •�'�
��� '_.' ._.___ ----�� �t
�I o� "�"_Sauthv2 ew �t�ev -------- -BiY-4332�-H3¢�-544------ --part- -� --- 4-3: 69— --
ii:
i _� ---
.71 I' � � �'1
��� 93�
_u_ �7. tl9 �= ' �
ia� Tata3s-Temp-EnecFc-M«mber..._.�___ ____.._-63___.._----------•._-_._•------•--------- ---------�- -------�- ---------..r_��----.�.._-.._;�,i
� ` ;s;.
��� 3em� �Yrach ltlumber E6 '�� ^�
I76. _.�'_...'_'."'-__" "_-_'___..' _..'__'�_�_____.�_'_'__""'�___..-___.�.� �—_____..'___'�_'".�.'__""_'__ '_ ._��_._.�__-..!
� � 6E Sun 7Vewspapers 02-4:�`98�-Qr8fi-851� hrg not Fam theatsr^ 2L?.39 '�:_,.,
��� .. :
18� 66 3tri7 Jdewspapers tb1-4'�4@-th90-8ttr hrg ioat L1��v112 i7.22
�� 6_.Str»-4VrwsPa#�e+'s -•— - -•----t'+2-9L4th-Q+84�-6@ --- -•--h�^f-rn�t-al-]ay-vac----^- - Z2:-8� .
20 ` �ie' �uYi ?V�cvS¢apel^5 5+1-4�_4Ye-11Y�-3� trrg nat �d f`at^ b.td 38.6ih ` �:�,•j.��
2tI, 66 9u» We►vspapers ,_. ----- 42-4:�48'-f888�-60 -------� hi^g »at 13e�tQx !-- ' 38.42 ------- ,
: �;'
6-9urr-fdewsp�{se+rs------ - -¢rY-4�4ge-Ta�-��.-- ..-hrg-rlot-l-`utnarm- --2�:37-----------=-
�z3� 66 9itn Naws{1�pe7^s +�►2-9;?4Sr-8�46-Qrtn hrg Y�ot Sfi-3 7]'�.2A �c
(Zqj f,6 9ui� tuews�sapel^s Q�3-9S4�7+--Q�8r2t-pr2� hi^g nnt a11ey vac 34.16
r(��.�.�� ---- ---------._..__�.._----•- -----'-------- --- --- -----.-__.�--------- --�� _.-..-�_--_- -
I261 , "'-8 'c�'88. Ki2 .�, F
iz�� 7ctB]s iemp �hecH Number --^ J�---S£ ..' --`----- - • !J,
18! -----"---- -- -------�.��.____� _� _. -�.__�- J,.
'29! Fen�p �ec1e tOtfh71�LY' S! � 1
�:L
f. �.,.
�30 �.9�
.
I32 % TY.tpp-il23_�'_.""_�"_'______'_ '."...C�2�-]�18� _'-•----____'.____"�- � ��5_�—'-"—'___ --i��L�f/c^w''L4¢+ ._ .14�_
I33I E.'i� 'i�'itli='� �@ ' �4; ,
I34 c*ta2•s Temp-et�eck-daumuer--�-------67 -------- - •-- -- -- - --;°=;
,35I ;c` ' }
36� ���� £hecsc tvtfmbsr 6S '4:
----�--'-------------�------_._—T_._�_-- -�- - �`-'`'a
37 __�--_' � . � . •o�
68 U S 1J�st Ec.mmuns cat 2 o»s 8�2 -92� 8r-2 y Qe-10 • i5ec svc � 27+4. 4 3 � ` lsa'r �
38 .
39 • 6B �f $ NESt CUA7A7U/71 C2C 2 OYI� 811 -9L-'�Y 12t'�Q+'c"2+-Q@ -2YBC S VC 3A9. 8�'✓' •
40 B-tS-9-1Je�St--CtKrMnu»!-cat•3t*»5 ¢�2-9i?2N-¢�fiQe-9f�=— -sv =.�E►.-�3 ��
41 68 fJ 9 Hest �crmmunScatSans d+�-4E]IIr-181�-33 ber svc 249.f3�3 �,�' ;
42 £9 t1 S Nest �ammu»]c�tt9ans 2�-4L2Sr-th6tb-6'0 fY�c svc �¢i.�6 �� �
9-t3-9-44est-CommurrSratl artis-------eeY-�4L'1�-�ik3¢�-3S� -- —Der$vc Y-3 2: F�? �rFl
43 -
aa 65 tJ 5 West �cvntnttnlcat9rrrns dr2-4L24�-Qr'.�-� i>ec svc 33.43 ���� �
45 6B U 5,b4etat CaMmurllcat.ta»s t�Y^4L1¢�-II+i¢+-'Y¢� iSec svc . 3�,43 j 9;
6-!?�-1�s c-Sc'rnmerrr! cat 3rns----�-7-4P1 ¢e-Qr6S�-B0 ---45ec-� 3:�:^4+4 �q-y
4E '6'i
47 �- ___.'� ��2�
IQS s]2 ].ySr31. �3 i�:f
Trmp �tteck fVumb�r � 69
�9 t� 9 Fast flff2ce�
—89 -
' 7'ata2c 7em¢ Cf�eck ltlttmb�r
'¢�1-439 5-S 2 �-10
Ea9
perm� t 6'266
I L-`�+. L'+2�
�'YR t�n2 !ot^ms U»S 2 mi ted H2 -4ii9 Qr-ferc'`'N-c^f+ �pl ys E►] sots 135�. �
2
3
a
�
�
a
9
i
�
;.�
4�ec Y�t �1,a1ms L.tst Fagc3 1� I�'�
'T�e"`31":Y�i--AJq---------- ----------- - -----__.. C]ty aT-t�t�»data�Hesghts ----.__ ._----,--,----,-------. .-.___..._.__.__ _.._._,. _._ _n
1�1
TeMp �EtierH. ?+Pumbei^ 'i�2a � ' � `�
SI
Ternp.
�ecx
------------ - • •- - _-_• .._--- •-- -•__ _-----.__ _ ��__.� � ---- --- ------------- - ----- -�_ �_ . __._ �..
I ; �`..�
f„ �
��ae-- ---------^fircc��unt�-�ade.__—._----- --Comments�-----_.._.�----- --Amau»t--- ------ ;:�j
7@ Un2 i'arms Un] 2m1 ted 7b1-4421h-tZ��rA-E¢r sp] ys AncYei^sc�n t1 &�. �'3 , I�
—7Q+-27tf2YC:t^IqS...t1Y12"2M2tLd'------"..--8+2-4�1'�et-�hc`S�-�^-C� ---------"---'SD]y5'fl2'1']'CSCK'--"'-'--`--`-�'--^.--"-`-."7i:3Y -'--' �=�i
--_ ___.._� jt , i �
;i 2 Qt 4tiEr. 36 •
. ,.
—Yata2s-?'em¢-Ctiecfc-taarmber - - --•--- �--7�h -- - ------ -------------- -------•------- ----._. .�----_ _�.-----��----� -----.-.�_T_..__--___.-�.-.-_�--1-._.�_. �,
cr;� -•�
Tem{s £heck Ncrmber 71 '��t
7s ttn2t�o Way St Qau2 �2-2¢�7tt� fsrc contr------•------------• 539.2:, ` .- `�_"� �
-- ---- `�
__73 ---__---------.�_..__.--`-__--�-----�-------------•------ --�'�._..��---------- --13i.-1�---�._.r-- —•---`--
Tatass Yemp �trecic laumber 71 .x.�� ,
. ��_ '
?ii�
Temp-�heck-Nctmber_.__.J_.___--7�-------�------•---•--- --�-----------•-------- --�---_.. _.�, --- -•--.�.r.� _
� z3�
i' ' ,
?;� t1rs2 vers2 ty nf M.! nn 8�4 -448+¢�-Qr�-�^i'� regr De2 mant 48t. �Y �3�• °
: �I
7;?—�_�.___�_ _------ ----- -------------..T__------•---`--•----^-----^-------'--- -----------.�._9�.YY0.�.�,-- - �n _ �
Tata2� 7c�n7p Ehec3c ?Vtrmber 7c ?"��'
: i.
-'-----.�.�--"'----- '-._ �".r.___.___.....-�'-�'-- - -"-_--"_�'�"-'-'-----�.-'_.�_._.__ .w'�---- ----�:
'i'aulp �»eck Nunrber i3 !: �; �
.;����
'.:m
�:s-1y��s'or,-Ener�y--�------•--- ---¢E3-43�-¢+.`._r�-�----- --• -splys----�--------------�-----::4:-¢��-«_ - ���',;�
73 V2$2o�� Eneryy dt2-432�-�1��0-^..i�2t spiys c4.�T¢+ ,n�;••��
'73 1r3 s2 c�n E»srgy 03 -H38r"S-¢3�-:,� spl ys ��4. Y'�r �'13i
. .,
-- -� .�.---"--'----'"-------"-_"-'-"_---' �.��_�.�-'_ -------- -----'_._---"--"--'.��-----'--- -..�._.-- ---v----��- �-i
rt,{:
•� a s �:^. Qta � , ,�
Tota2.� Temp �heck JVumbei^ ?3 �"°�
� fl�
, _' __ "" _"___"'__"�__"� _'_�.._"-'_'_�-' ' �_ "'__'._ . ,_- '__-_..�.A�,
7emp CYI�cK Mumber^ 7+f ',o;. !
.i
—7yi-We�ter»-�27e�»s--�------8+2-�i��3;^-e332-3&� - f3�c-{sr^�M ------- 3✓N��¢t —`y a
� _._--- t .
7a . �se�. �¢+ E�=� '
�
Temp �hecX 1Vttmb�rf^ 7`3
7� f,t2 »thrc p 6 N�2 nst 2 ne �7-4�=�'�8F-835-r2t4r
7� W 2 rithi^ap 6 Wc 1 nst 2 ne ar1 -4L?�-1 �c�-8¢�
?':��2rrChi�crp-4'-Wei»st7»e-----Q�1,-9�",?I--Yi.�`L'+-Y2t— -
7� Wlnthrop & We.!»zt.tne �0-4E97-853-tZrt2�
7✓ bdinthrop 6 i4e3nst2rre @f3-4�c�-��^B�-�
37�
Tata 2 s Tamp tneck lvttmtre�^ 7�
'Temp �J'lecle ftlumber 9E
?6
17ct Re Fctr2 cmg
Qct Re 7Se+i�singtra��
Uct Ra Feder2r2 ].ancf
�ct {srosecuti2a»s
�. 8+E4
7'3. 8�¢+
-'3@+L�Bt&---
469� 6tt+
1i435.�4
� z '32 �'✓. 34
--L��'5----
�s. ss
i
� � . - - ---- -- ; -
I4 2Sec } yj�,T� — _
� —"Tue�"2-:�T--frM---- -- -
2
3 ?'etnp Ohec7,� Mtrmbet^
i a —"--_�_ ----
� Temp.
� �hech
� I vmbet^�-V�Y,r]ot^ -Name �------•-
a
��9
'i'y,��—____—. _ __'._ _'_—'
�i�I 6rand Tatal
i;,
13 ___—�__"'_.-'. __' _ .__._._ .
74
.1�
76 �_.� .._.""_ _ "'_"""_
.n
�la3ms i2st
------�----�------•-�-�-Ctty af-Mei�dota-tfelghts
?fi
-----------Accc.urrL• -�cde -------.._�—.---
fiage 9 3
0
_..---- —•-----Amacrr+t -----
--�---- 7tZrT 434: c6---------
�� C�C�
'� � -�`�--- � --22888�—�- 200.00 Da1e �lischnewski � Re: Sib2y comfot station ^ � ^^� �
12889 30.00 Hennepin Covnty Warrants P.D.
22890 3,442.32 State CapitoZ Credit Un Z1/16 pagroll deductions
- -.�__- ---.-------- I2891___._147:I5^�Clagton Erige2 ----------personaS svcs -------�—�+____--••--------
12892 • 2.32 Bi1Z LeFbs reimb deduction error
--�--.___.._.----- 12893 8,335.61 PERA 11/2 payroll - --,-` _-
, --'1`2894 Z3,340.84 DakotaCountg Bank J 11/16 w/h �
12895 500.00 " 11/16 payro22 deductions
__�^ ___ 12896 3,160.14 Co�mui.ssioner of Rev 11/16 w/h
- 12897---40,790:Zfi � Payroll a%c��"--- ' 11/16 net. payroll —y'�_._..___.____._..._..�,-- _�---•
12898 5.50 Mi.cro Soft handling chgs
12899 466.2Z Tires PZus CEO cars
70,420.25
G.T. 140,854.91
r �r }
i`�i .
f`j1 .
�e2t �
��;
iL4'
;6 ;.
���I i
G; �
�GF.�
�G9�
���I .
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November 26, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis�.��4;��
FROM: James E. Danie o
Public Works D or
SUBJECT: Heussner Alley Vacation
File No. 8708
DISCUSSION•
Recently Mr. Gregg Quail, a local contractor, approached
the City to obtain a building permit to convert an existing three
season porch into a heated living space and replace the three
season porch at a different location. He was representing Mr.
and Mrs. Ralph Huessner, 654 ist Avenue. Initially our building
inspectors noticed that the Heussner's had an existing garage
that encroached on a platted alley. They denied the permit
because they felt that the alley encroachment put the property in
an existing non-conforming status that could not be expanded. In
a meeting with the planner and staff it was later determined that
only the existing garage was non-conforming and that the building
permit to improve the home could be issued.
Although he does not now have to have the alley vacated in
order to complete his house remodeling, Mr. Huessner would still
like to vacate the alley so that his garage will be on his own
property (see attached map�. Staff has also encountered some
problems with the alley, area residents have insisted the City
remove some trees within this same alley further west. The City
does not intend to ever use the alley and we suggest that the
entire length be vacated, subject to a drainage and utility
easement (for NSP). ,
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends that
located within Block 7, of
to a drainage and utility
ACTION RE4UIRED:'
Council vacate the 20 foot wide alley
T.T. Smith's Subdivision No. 3 subject
easement.
Conduct the public hearing
have been notified) and then if
Huessner's request and staff's
motion adopting Resolution No.
VACATION OF AN ALLEY.
JED: dfw
(all abutting property owners
Council desires to implement Mr.
recommendation they should pass a
90- , RESOLUTION APPROVING
� ]
� � :✓! �,�, � M��r ►
! r • � ��-•� �rn�"*�"
�R , � , � • ~ �
�, t �� �
������ 1� . �
„� ��' r�I�►��• � �"'
� � . W-� � . �
� � �iir ����r rr.� wa�t.�r� .�
, � r� � ��¢� +li� �� .,.
s � � � � ,�s � � ��
t ���
! � * ! '� -� � �
� 4i
� � , ' �� . � ,..�.�
� . �� ,.. ��� 4 � ��i.
�Y
��
� y .
y� �" ,�
� � ,�� �
� �' :� �� �
,,,� �-� �►--
► ..�.� � � L- - � � � ,.
„ . , , . ,� ,/,!
* � �� "
■�� � �
� ►
, �,►., �i��,,� ,�,=�.!� ■
� �, � � �� �
. , I I'� �
� � �� �
� :� ., .���� . .
�i � .
�� +� ■ .
� �� a�"� . ►
� .
� �� ��� _ . � '� � ! � i � ,� .
� ��• � � 4r � �
.�
!•
��
♦
� ii
r - �
��
* �
� '
;, � .
/ `3
�C '�v /� (� LOGO %raN
� �v; i pr NG �'
�
�
�
�
_.0---
6
_ � ��
i
. �
�
v
�
-�--�
�� c
� � � � �.�� ' � � � .N — — —
��y_� ��,v,� ���-- �` _ - -
�N�--�,,.,Q�z -- -- --.- --. .--
--� � -- � � --------a � � . L f_'�r� nn�...�-• _
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF AN ALLEY
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights is the current record owner of a
alley as described as follows;
That part of the following described property situated in Dakota
County, Minnesota:
That part of the recorded plat T.T. Smiths Subdivision No. 3
originally dedicated as an alley in Block 7 of the above men-
tioned plat.
and
< �
WHEREAS, a notice of hearing on said vacation has been duly published
and posted more than two weeks before the date scheduled for the
hearing on said vacation, all in accordance with the applicable Minne-
sota Statutes; and •
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said vacation on December 4,1990
at 7:45 o'clock P.M. or as soon as possible thereafter, at the City
Hall of the City of Mendota Heights; and
WHEREAS, the City Council then proceeded to hear all persons interest-
ed in said vacation and all persons were afforded an opportunity to
-present their views and objections to the granting of said petition.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the vacation of the alley described above, situated in
the City of Mendota Heights, is in the best interest of the
public and the City, and is not detrimental to the health,
safety and welfare of the community.
2. That the above described street right-of-way be and the same
is hereby vacated reserving from said vacation a utility
easement over, under and across the full extent of the
herein described alley, for drainage and utility purposes.
3. That the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized and directed
to prepare and present to the proper Dakota County officials
a notice of completion of these vacation proceedings, all in
accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes.
That in accordance with said resolution, said vacation proceedings
have been completed.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 4th
day of December, 1990.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E, Mertensotto, Mayor
A'rTEST :
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
�t' = '�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November 30, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis�r
FROM:• Klayton H. Eckles ��
Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Glenhill Road Reconstruction
Job No. 8310
DI5CUSSION•
Council directed staff to notify the neighborhood of the two
options for reconstructing Glenhill Road. Attached is a copy of
the letter I sent to the residents along Glenhill Road and Culli-
gan Lane. Twenty-eight letters were sent out and to date there
have been no comments on the cul-de-sac or through street option.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends Council publicly discuss the two options
for Glenhill Road.
ACTION REQUIRED:
After discussing the two options for Glenhill Road, Council
should direct staff to prepare a resolution for Council approval
at a future meeting.
KHE:dfw
t - •'�t
November 21, 1990
Subject: Mendota Interchange Project
Job No. 8310
Dear Property Owner:
This letter is in regard to your property which lies in
the Glenhill Road/Culligan Lane Neighborhood in Mendota
Heights. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/Dot)
intends to reconstruct Highway 110 and the intersection of .
the Victoria Curve Frontage Road and Glenhill Road�The
intended realignment would change the traffic patterns in
your neighborhood. Therefore, the City would like your input
on the proposed change.
The proposed change would mean the elimination of the
connection of Glenhill Road to the Frontage Road. Instead a
cul-de-sac would be constructed on the end of Glenhill, so
there would no longer be access to Victoria Curve. You would
gain access to your property by way of Culligan Lane. This
would also reduce the amount of thru-traffic in your
neighborhood. Eliminating one access point to the
neighborhood would eliminate some thru traffic in the area,
but would also mean Culligan Lane would be the only way in
and out. The attached drawing shows the cud-de-sac and the
old Mn/Dot prop�sal involving a� ��S" curve.
This project would be constructed in 1992-93. There
`
would be little or no disturbance to your property. If you
have any questions or concerns please call me at 452-1850.
The City Council will consider the Mn/DOT proposal at
their December 4th meeting. Any input from you at or before
the meeting would be very helpful. You are invited to attend
the meeting to voice your preferences or concerns.
Sincerely,
. . �ti� -•
Klayton H. Eckles, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Attachment
V�Rc�NicA
�
EN N1L1. R4AC? R�A!-1GNM�NT
. � ti.
'I
� ����
G�ou.�d' -�� �� l-�.�'�
: -.�;z
��, <
� �,���� ������e�.�./ The Gavins
G�/�''/� � 1199 Culligan Lane
`�� ���' /�,f� , �c%� Mendota Heights, Minnesota
, 55118
<.�°������ (612) 687-0271
Fax: 683-9411
December 2, 1990
City of Mendota Heights
C/O Klayton H. Eckles, P.E.
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Charles
Janet
Carl
John
Burt
Joe
Christine
RE: Mendota Interchange Project
Job No. 8310
Mertensotto
Blesener
Cummings, III
Hartmann
Anderson
Smith
Koch
We are deeply disturbed about these proposed changes.
We live at the crest of the hill on Culligan Lane and, as
the parents of three young children (ages 6,4 and 1), we
already are very concerned about the traffic on Culligan
Lane. It's our opinion that the proposed change will make
our street less safe. The entire neighborhood is home to
many young children, many of whom use Culligan Lane for
biking, walking and playing. Increased traffic jeopardizes
their ability to use Culligan Lane safely.
Indeed, an increase in trafficlon Culligan Lane means an
increase in traffic on Hunter Lane, another street used by
many young children. In our opinion, both Culligan and
Hunter lanes are unsafe now because the grades on the hills
make them "blind" to all but the most cautious motorist.
Couple that physical fact with the large number of children
in our neighborhood -- we estimate it conservatively at 40
children under age 11 -- and we hope you'l1 understand our
concern.. These children ride their bicycles, walk and play
on both Culligan and Hunter, neither of which have pathways
or sidewalks. We believe a deliberate move to increase
traffic on these lanes is extremely unwise and potentially
dangerous.
We also question whether there aren't too many homes and
lots in this area to support only one access point. From
Lexington Avenue, our neighborhood currently is accessible
via either Orchard Lane or Victoria Curve. In the less than
two years we have lived here, there have been a number of
occasions when access via Orchard was closed. Fortunately,
Victoria Curve was open. Your proposal calls for Culligan
Lane to be the only access to this area. If it were to be
2 rt
closed for some reason, access would be extremely difficult
-- not only for homeowners and their guests, but for
emergency vehicles, as well.
Furthermore, the reason for this costly change is unclear.
The current traffic system appears to satisfy the needs of
the neighborhood. The memorandum from Mr. Eckles states
that the purpose of the change is to "eliminate some through
traffic in the area." To our knowledge, the streets here
are used primarily by the residents and their guests. To
the extent that the change eliminates traffic on the west
end of Victoria Curve, it increases traffic on Culligan and
Hunter, and, as Mr. Eckles notes, leaves only one access
into our neighborhood. As stated earlier, the benefits of
these changes are not readily apparent.
We think it unreasonable, unwise, and unsafe to make
Culligan Lane the only access point to this area. The
following of our neighbors feel similarly. They've signed
this document to show their support for preventing the
proposed Mn/Dot changes from being implemented.
We hope you will give our viewpoints strong consideration in
this important matter.
Sincerely,
E O'�'r� �,�,+`t�-- � � 17�—_
Tom Gavin Sara in
����h� �- ��`e�i� � � ��� �2v� ����� j��
L �� v a— C�-e
:,
���{r� H�,���ev l.�:t�� �
� �( �i � � —
� (�.c� cc�;av, ' � `f'
��.,�� �--,, � .�,����
, ���.
�
t f � "J L
Sf .�r�e.. �,. �. �� �,,�, � �7 � �� �- f �c�. - ('��
�..� �...��°�e� ���,,.�.� ��r�o ��ti�� ��
.ti� r , ,� �� �. �,�ffo � -� �
. . �
����� tr'.
� � '
f�'l�!%��� .
�
, ..., _ ��_ � .
�, � i
, _ iv , _ , �
'4 .
*
Addendum to signature by Richard Swanson:
This signature was given on the basis of the letter sent by
Mr. Eckles on November 21. It was understood from this
letter that the decision was to either create a cul-de-sac
at the end of Glenhill, or to leave the road intact. It has
since come to light that there may be other proposed changes
to the road system in our neighborhood.
At a minimum, my signature suggests that there has not been
enough information and represents my desire for more
information on the plans under consideration for our
neighborhood. I also ask that no decision be made tonight
without full disclosure of all plans under consideration for
the roadways in our neighborhood, so that an informed
decision can be made.
�L�c��������� �'��o�G '����r��� .'l`�� . .� .9?`
. .:Transportation Center
1i45 Medallion Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesata 5512Q (612} 681-2332
Charles Mertensotto
December 3, 199Q
Mendata Hei�hts Ci,ty Counci.l
II01 �Vi.ctaria Curve
Mendota Heights, 1V.IN SSI.I$
Re Victoria Curve Access to Glenhill Road
;
Lad'zes and Gentlemen of the Czty Counczl:
School. District bus rautes currently serve sixteen students residing in
the Glenhill Road/Culligan Lane area who attend th,ree pu6lic schools
and one nan-public school in the district. Bus stops for all of these
students are at ttie Glenhill Road/Culligan Lane intersectian.
�
Victoria Curve and Culizgan Lane afford excellent drive through
access to this azea and we suppart continuation of such. In the ever�t
access is restzicted to Culligan Lane only, busin� alternatives wili be
to making "turnaraund" bus stops at Cuiligan and Glenhzil (passzble,
but not desirabl� fram a safety pointj or, movin� the stops to the
I�unter and Cul�igan Lanes intersection.
�
;
Your favorable consideratian in retaining the Victoria Curve access ta
Glenfiill Road will be very much appreciated.
Sincerely,
��
Axnald E. Swanson
Supervi.sor of Transportation �
"WE AR� A MEMBER QF AiV EQUAL OPPOR7UNlTY COMMUNliY"
��.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS f� ,
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
i
�
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL 1990 TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 1991
�
�
1 '
i -
WHEREAS, the City has previously adopted a Tentative Tax Levy
Resolution No. 90-56 which was subject to revision at the time of
the public hearing, and
WHEREAS, the City has conducted a public hearing on December
4, 1990, on the tentative budget tax levy.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council amend
Resolution No. 90-56 to reflect adoption of the following levy for
tax against all taxable property in the City of Mendota Heights for
collection in the year 1991.
General Fund ' � �
Emergency Prep.
Fire Relie`f
Infra Structure Res.
Watershed District
Equip. Cert.
Levy Subject to Limitation
Special Debt Levies
Park Bonds
MWCC Debt
Improvement Bonds
Equipment Cert.
Total Special Levy
�
Total Levy
$1,883,590
1,500
12,650
50,000
20,000
98,188
$2,065,928
$ 180,000
30,000
17,400
63,812
$ 291,212
$2,357,140
The Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of
this resolution to the Dakota County Auditor.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 6th
day of December, 1990.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
i� �y
RESIDENTS OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS:
We want to thank you for your interest in the proposed City
tax levy for 1991 and the Budget.
The Notice of Tentative Tax Levy, which you have received,
calls for a potential levy of $2,444,920 or an increase of some
13.8 percent. I believe the tentative levy is a bit misleading
and, I will try to e�lain the mechanics which make up the levy.
Under the Truth and Taxation Law, the City must establish a
tentative levy in August, some two months earlier than usual, and
before many of the budget elements can be determined. As a result,
the City has approved a maximum levy set up at our legal levy
limit. Once set, the tentative levy cannot be increased. At the
present time, the Council budget under consideration would require
a levy of some $87, 000 less than the notice, an increase of 9. 8
percent.
The levy is made up of two segments, one is the special levies
for debt service and the other for general City operations.
The levy for debt service in 1991 shows a major increase of
some $125,000 which represents the first installment on the Park
Bond Issue approved in 1989. Each of the next two years will also
show increases for the Park Bonds as the balance of the bonds are
issued.
The levy for general City operations is expected to increase
about $75,000. On a percentage basis, this is four percent over
the 1990 levy. The proposed budget is pretty much a status quo
budget, with increases in very few areas. As a service type
organization, our personal service costs are some $1,460,000 or
about 57 percent of our total budget. No new personnel are
budgeted for 1991.
Based on the projected budget, the 9.8 percent increase will
be spread over a larger tax base which has grown between four and
five percent. .The City levy represents only 18 percent of your
total tax bill, and if your home value has not increased, the
proposed tax le�y increase will be in the four to six percent range
for City taxes.
° The County levy represents about 25 percent of your total tax
bill while the School represents 55 percent. Metro agencies
comprise the balance of the levy.
We do not expect that the City levy will amount to a
significant increase for homes that have not had an increase in
market value.
In addition to the City general operations, we operate two
Enterprise Funds. The Engineering Fund is financed by charges for
City improvements and services which are paid by new developers and
as charges against new construction.
The Sewer Fund is financed through the quarterly sewer bills.
These rates have remained unchanged since 1987 and no increase is
planned for 1991. The primary expense of the Sewer Fund is the
charge by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) for
treatment of our sewer. If these charges continue to increase in
the future, we can expect sewer rate increases in the years 1992 or
later. �
I hope that this will help you better understand the City tax
levy which will be considered at the December 4th City Council
meeting. We appreciate your concern.
If you have specific questions on
operations please give us a call or come
complete copy of the Budget is available fo
and we will have summaries available at the
f
�
the City Budget or
to the meeting. A
r review at City Hall,
meeting.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
i
�
i
November 28, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director �
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistan
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-43: Centre Pointe Medical Clinic -
Sign Variance
DISCUSSION
Ms. Sue Zwirner attended the November Planning Commission
meeting to request the variances needed to allow Centre Pointe
Medical Center install a temporary banner on their roof (see
attached staff inemos).
,
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend
approval of the variance to allow the banner.
ACTION REOUIRED
If Council desires to implement the Planning Commission's
recommendation, they should pass a motion approving variances
allowing a seventy-five (75) square foot sign area and allowing the
sign to be mounted on the roof (for a period not to exceed three
months).
JED/KLB:kkb
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
Planning Commission
November 21, 1990
James E. Danielson, Public Works Director
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistan�
CASE NO. 90-43: Centre Pointe Medical Clinic -
Sign Variance
DISCIISSION
ti
Centre Pointe Medical Clinic, located across the highway from
City Hall, recently installed a roof top banner advertising their
business. The Clinic is a relatively new endeavor in the City and
they are having trouble establishing their business, they feel that
they need a banner installed on their roof to alert nearby
residents of their location.
Roof top signs are prohibited within the City's Zoning
Ordinance and the Clinic was directed to remove the banner and to
meet with Planner Malloy if they desired to pursue a variance to
have it replaced. In their meeting with Planner Malloy, they
informed him that they felt it would be very beneficial to their
business if they could replace the banner. Planner Malloy felt
that if they would display the sign only for a limited time (the
Ordinance allows up to three months for temporary signs) that the
City could favorably consider their request.
ACTION REOIIIRED
Review the proposal with the applicant and make a
recommendation to the City Council on the following two variances:
1. Seventy-five (75) square feet of sign area
(Twenty-five (25) square feet allowed)
2. Sign to be mounted on the roof
NOTE: The applicant will bring a sample of their proposed
banner to the meeting.
,
x ; �
�
} �
. . �' {
- PLANNING REPORT
UATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT: f
1
LOCATION:
27 November 1990
• � ��
Sue Zwirner for
Pointe Medical Clinic
1150 Highway 110
Ce ntre
ACTION RE�UESTED: Sign Variance
�
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
.�
i
1. The applicant; wishes to place a temporary banner-type sign on the
Centre Pointe Medical Clinic Building located south of Highway 110.
The sign has 'already been made and was displayed on the building until
it was discovered that the applica�t did not have a permit for it. The
sign is basically a banner approximately 18 i�ches high with characters
that are about 12 inches wide. The banner is to be hung in two lines
-- the top line reading "NOW OPEN IMMEDIATE CARE" and the second
line reading "FAMILY PRACTICE". The banner cloth is blue and the
letters are white. Many of you may have seen it before it was taken
down. i
2.
The Clinic has recently opened an immediate care facility within the
building that offers medical treatment for those ailments requiring
prompt attention, but not necessarily emergency hospital care. The
nature of this service requires that people be very familiar with its
location. The City recently approved a sign variance to ailow a second
freestanding business sign on this property. The purpose of that sign
was to indicate the location of the e�try drive to insure that people
did not miss �the facility as they arrive. The previously approved sign
has been installed. The purpose of the proposed temporary banner is to
announce the �location of the facility during the crucial first few months
of operation. � The sign would be attached to the screen fence that
hides the rooftop equipment on top of the building.
i
�
The Sign Section of the Ordinance permits temporary signs for a period
of three months. These signs are limited to a maximum surface area
of 25 square face feet. The proposed sign is roughly 60 square feet in
area. Therefore, the variance would be to allow the additional 35
square feet o� surface area.
3. The Clinic Building is set back relatively far from Highway 110, which
is the roadway that offers the best exposure for the clinic in terms of
making people aware of its location. While the existing freestanding
sign is visible� from the Highway, it is far enough off the roadway that
if you are not looking for it, you could miss it. This sign may be
adequately once the public knows the clinic and what services they
offer. �
Centre Poi�te Clinic, Case No. 90-43
Page 2
4. In the past, the City has allowed temporary banners for businesses and
buildings that are opening or attempting to lease vacant space. The
primary concern with signs is always the aesthetic impact on the
community. This is particularly true with this sign since it will be
located on the roof of the structure. The Mendota Heights Ordinance
does not permit permanent rooftop signage. However, in light of the
nature of this use, we believe it would be reasonable to allow the
proposed sign on a temporary basis only.
f �j �
{ �
� ti?;�-c -KUrJK � — . . . -
!-+IGHWAY NO IIQ �
�Y �I G H T 0 F V4���,Y P --
LAT 0.9 2
=' �r �• • 'i '� :/..c.. r.5 � ��c�c . o:, E L�' S(o ! c �'S' 4 7a.cwG.�y � , i - �/�J6 yp
- - - •
ii� ` O/L•Y.".J '��C�C Ooo�f (o L �l if � �f6L .B — _ - - _ '
' °��.;L
I 1006� : - -53=9
� 6 lOLa9
Q m G:y�a�5a
s
•r Q ,�n
P / �
�' w N
J
S� ;
� o =T
v � •v
. Q
' z w �,
}�"' Z (
z SUBJECT;� �
� PROPERTY - 2
; � ;�
J " �
D ' j
� w f� � 1
1.� ' �
� 1 �
Z ; NORTH ;
,,� •
I SCALE: 7 "=200'
; U
i ? '. � �
� i52.32 rveq'i�'�9"E
_ .' _ _�:i9B4.B6
��: ... • . ..
� {:: -�9?. �}'
} :j;��.`•�3�'Q:i
i �. ::�;:
� �-:
c �: : '�:•: :•:•: '•'�:�'•:•'-:�:
� �I�.:�
� �I•.
� :::
i ,•::`:: ��: �' '�d �:
52 3��� N 6 i5 t9 E•.
J�
0
i CENTRE
: �p �f
f �
�
a .+
Q P
Q ^.
J
L
a N1 G
!�Y
I
�G
.�
y / .
�/ �
.n i
9� 30 36-' R°ZT89.79__ S9 �
µ:ec:: �2 `' .a6j.05- -�= 3�a 48 yJO I�
o � O I i
� . t3� �r�" -_ _1 03p5 a1:� p:6 27 3� 09 6
• ' �c � / Bo
_ q_,9 6'� S�. �
-:.:i''f `�. . 29e3z R, m 9e e9 ���OUTLOT A
_ .>9 . a` p�e �� 31 ,i 9� � W �
3 ' ,y2A�o t�S. ��Ojs/'�, �p��g9 h n I
�1 � O e� 9 tQ � I
�•���� "�2 p. '�I/1 J� Q_ 3% 9 Y b
pM ��, ,'�_ .�� F� e os�,, a I
':O � 4 c^ �• a O Ssr �'1 I N.
-�aQ c ° R'� R:26 � �
O
:• i :�,,q j G, 0 �C n
I e _ I
�'1 68.08 N89' �5� �9 E! .. 5.. 6 O Ii992 � N
-- �SBQO • 59 �5 �9 w-
-. . I 1
/ I
PAR T F LOT 1 '
�
.� i �
� AU OR' S SU BDIVI�ION
J ` �� � .
^JO �4, MENDOTA �
�
�
�
/ ru99� �5� �9`E �88!Y� .g�=�
OINTE s DRIV E � ' - ,=55
� p:)6� 2� • z�a`
<SO C`0 -06c9 ^' Z' ✓
` la " ,
>
y a50
i ��c,t�—r- Lo-�`
S V
o �
o ''
J �
fl
a•'c�
-- -----•-• • ,
. . .....__ .._. . . ......- --- - - ----- - -..^.___---
• , ..•. . �
• '�""'::�� - - - -- -
J- '4!`'1'FiE:^ ` . _ ... _ ....... .. . .......
„ .. ._ . . ..
; ' ;» • ' •--".-*-..-:..: "'.� : t• ��.+•�
_.r_ . . R�/Y�:.: , � a %'1 �v. � :,._�� ..+C�++l�V� i n;�y1rY;'. !na!).. � . -:Ti -�. ' � `
0
Healt���ast �C;
November 19, 1990
De�r Neighbors,
559 Capitol Boulevard
St. Paul, Mtd 55103
612-221-2200
Hea.lth�;ast has recent].y apened two medical operations
lor_ated in Cen�re Poin�e Medic�.l Clinic. We £eel that these
operati.ons, Haaltheast Tmmediate Care and Centre Poir.te
Pri�cary Care, � wi1.�. greatly bensfit ti�� commun3ty. Ir� orde�
ti
to annaunee o�r arxival, we have r�gne�ted Fermission irotn
the cit�r tv put a teu�gorar�r clot�� b�nner an our raaf . The
banner will read "N+DW OPEN IMMEDIATE CARE, FAMTLY .
PRACTICE". For those o£ yau who have no rrbjections �a this
ba*�ner, we ask that you sign �his let�er. The banner wiil be
disglayed ror three months.
Thank you for your h�1.p in tha.s matter.
5ineerely,
. �
Sue E. Zwirner
Cen�re Pointe Clinic Manager�
� 1�//.�' �' r�� � jp�rd �e �
I�Y- �.�.�-��C;:i�' ff - .��'�'�rP
v�Q r� p .
�' .�,.�.�..� �.�.�
r
�''
�
;-�r f���, ' ;�.�-�.-
�'.��-� �� �'�' .
c' i
a
�
C ity o�
.�.,� .• 1Viendota Heights
Applicant Name: _
� Address: �'"lS'D
.: APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
� OF
PLANNING REQUEST
' Case Na — -7"�
� Date of A lication /
G'�'� ���'� �,�,� ee Paid �kici.
� i�'� y . _,_ _ _ _ .
(I.ast)
I
.��
(Number &
(City) (State) (Zip)
Owner Name: .U/ A Tiy � � ,u.� r .Q•� �r.4� i � -
. - _ (Last) � (F'ust) � (1v� � _
Address:
(Number & Street) � � (City) (State) � (Zip)
Street I.ocation of Property in Question: �,�1�� .
Legal I3escription of Property:
Z�pe of Requesi:
Rezoning
Conditional Use Permit
- Cainditional Use Permit for P.0 D.
Plan Approval �
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
�_ Variance ��t r�
Subdivision Ap�iro al
Vfteflands Peimit
Other (auach explanation)
Applicable (�ity Ordinance Numbe � �( % . Section _ � � � v / / � � i$, 7 L� �
.
Present Zoni.ng of ProPertY�.lL� Present Use � I �I /1�.1�%
Proposed Zoning of Property , �� Proposed Use 1 t
I hereby declare that all statements made in this regiiest and o the addirional
material are tnie. •
Signature o pplicant)
. 1;/�/�G
(Date)
.
(Received by - Tide)
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850
C ity o�
.... �. � 1Viendota Heights
November 29, 1990
Ms. Sue Zwirner
Centre Pointe Medical Clinic
1150 Highway 110
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Ms. Zwirner:
Your application for �C 5 t �c�.�-�u.tnt�S will be
considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled
meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, ,(�.�G . L( , �� q p The
Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in
the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on
attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive
Council consideration.
The Planning Commission recommended U�n.a��w�o�S l� �
0..A a r'o v e re.a � rP S�i-�.�% V ci.rt aV� C!L S 'f'o ct �� o c.r�
'Cb o't� �"h n 5' ����o�c" �J M Q✓��5 C� T �� 5�? , t' T.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
�:�1r- ��
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Vlendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850
.• �
C ity ��
.1. � � 11 1Viendota Heights
November 23, 1990
Ms. Sue Zwirner
Centre Pointe Medical Clinic
1150 Highway 110
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Ms. Zwirner:
Your application for a�� ti V'o`,v-«v�, will be
considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly
scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, �pv• 27
The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clockti�.M., here
at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative
should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your
application will receive Commission consideration.
If you.have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
��� �j
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
� : .
1101 Victoria Curve -1Viendota Heights, 1ViN - 55118 452 • 1850
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November 28, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Direc
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist n/�,�
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-41: Callahan - Wetlands Permit
DISCUSSION
Mr. Callahan, of 1851 Warrior Drive, appeared before the
Planning Commission at their November meeting and presented his
request for a Wetlands Permit to leave a constructed shed in place
approximately twenty five feet (25') from the edge of the Wetlands
at Warrior Pond (see attached staff inemos and plans).
At the meeting, the applicant presented signatures of consent
from all his contiguous neighbors, except for Mr. Roy LaPean. Mr.
Russ Wahl contacted City Hall in advance of the meeting, on behalf
of Mr. LaPean, requesting that the City conduct a public hearing to
consider this Wetlands Permit. Mr. LaPean was present at the
meeting and stated that he had no objection to the shed itself, but
did object to its intrusion on the Wetlands setback.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to waive the
requirement for a public hearing. The Planning Commission voted
unanimously to recommend that City Council approve the granting of
a Wetlands Permit to allow the Callahan's storage shed to remain in
place as constructed subject to the applicant planting a shrubbery
screen.
ACTION REOIIIRED
If the City Council desires to implement the Planning
Commission recommendation, they should pass a motion granting a
Wetlands Permit allowing the storage shed to remain in place as
constructed subject to the applicant planting a shrubbery screen.
NOTE: For Council's information, during his presentation to the
Planning Commission, Mr. LaPean complained about the City's
policy of making applicants obtain signatures of consent
from contiguous neighbors. He felt that having neighbors
get those signatures, puts them in a difficult position. If
they don't sign, they are bad neighbors and he felt
"intimidated" by the process. He suggested that City staff
send out notice and receive the signatures of consent.
-� '`'� . �. •. .. �• . � _ .. ',• . ... . ' . . . .. . . . •; . _ ..• . ..' • : ..
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November 20, 1990
Planning Commission '
James E. Danielson, Public Works Di ��
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis ��
CASE NO. 90-41: Callahan - Wetlands Permit
Ms. Nan Callahan, of 1851 Warrior Drive, constructed an
accessory structure (storage shedj within the one hundred foot
wetlands boundary without a building permit or a Wetlands Permit.
After the building was constructed, staff received an anonymous
call informing us of the structure. When contacted by City Code
Enforcement Officer Dick Gill, Ms. Callahan scheduled a meeting
with City Planner Malloy and submitted the attached letter of
intent and site plan.
In the case of a single family home, the Planning Commission
normally waives the requirement for a public hearing when
signatures of consent are obtained from immediate neighbors. Ms.
Callahan has obtained signatures from all her contiguous neighbors,
with one exception.
ACTION REOIIIRED
The Planning Commission needs to consider the waiving of the
public hearing. Should the Planning Commission waive the public
hearing, they then need to make a recommendation to the City
Council concerning the request to allow the utility shed to remain
in place as constructed.
JED/KLB:kkb
A
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REOUESTED:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
27 November 1990
90-41
Nan L. Callahan
1851 Warrior Drive
Wetlands Permit
1. The applicant has co�structed an S-foot by 12-foot utility shed on her
property at 1851 Warrior Drive. The property is the northernmost lot
of the six lots that were platted on the east side of Warrior Pond.
All of these lots are within the wetland area regulated by the City's
Wetland Ordinance. The Wetland Ordinance requires a permit for the
construction or alteration of any structure within 100 feet of the
normal high water mark of a designated wetland. The City was made
aware of the structure by an adjacent neighbor after it was already
built. This neighbor has expressed disapproval of the shed and has not
signed the applicant's letter requesti�g signatures of consent from the
surrounding neighbors. The rest of the adjacent land owners have signed
the letter.
2. The shed is located within 40 feet of the existing water line and within
7 feet of the side lot line. The Ordinance permits accessory structures
within 5 feet of a side or rear lot line.
3. Section 7 of the Wetlands Ordinance Lists 23 standards that must be
satisfied before a permit can be issued. The first five of these
standards deal with dredging or earthwork. The amount and type of
earthwork associated with the type of shed built on the subject property
would not be inconsistent with these siandards. Generally the standards
that deal with structures of this type are concerned with runoff, flood
damage, removal of vegetation, and soil erosion during construction.
Since the structure is not located on a portion of the property that was
not previously vegetated, there is no concern regarding vegetation.
The ordinance requires the lowest floor of all structures to be 3 feet
above the highest known water level of the pond. I am unable to
determine from the applicants sketch whether the shed meets this
requirement. However, since this is no� an occupied structure and does
not contain any plumbing, the concern regarding the first floor elevation
is minimal.
4.
With respect to the standards for runoff and erosion, the structure is so
small it would result in no significant increase in runoff. Since the
structure is already built a�d the turf is reestablished around it, there
is no co�cern for erosion.
The primary concern here is one of whether the shed represents a
significant impact to the aesthetic environment. I have seen pictures of
the structure. It is a typicaE prefabricated storage shed. One
Nan Callahan, Case No. 90-41
Page 2
suggestion that may improve how the structure blends i� with the
surrou�ding area, particularly as seen form the adjacent property where
the owner has expressed dissatisfaction, would be to screen the shed
with landscaping so that it is no longer visible for the adjacent
property. We believe ihat with appropriate screening the shed would
not be a detrimental addition to the environment surrounding the pond.
. ,
' (� `Zr
MA21 E — — — AV E. — —
a
zoi ZoZ 2eZ ZOZ Zo7_ ZSo Zroq�
' ' �
1 a `'� �,. " �
� A M
� L( �n Zo hj � q h; 1 8 h' / 7 e� �� -
� NI N� ,� �° fs �
� ��
� � � �
� J
I ; � �
I � 33 -
V y� �I .} � 7 Z S
Z 8 y� 29 h 3 o y� 3 I h� 3�-, O
� �I N Z4,< � �
�
w N' � . Z8� S �
o �
ZO % 2oZ I.OL 2oi 79%
380 / •.I
_A HA N PL A C�
�
� 3 S `�
� 1 1 �i' ' �5�� %�i�fC✓ C•Qs- �1 �� _ 34- J J nl
�
„o�a�6 � '• ooe.c� �� : Pl.yNrs M . � � � �
� • ^_ Q50-07 i !r �30-0� ;�
,,,t.r _ C � - U ti � �
� - -
��SI � i50 163.�3 , 439 S ioo �
A6 ? 0 S 2'i 4 A :`. � O: .�U 5 : YJ: i: iik }ii::ti� •}:: }}v.i:tititiv}}:{v}::••�: ••••••;:.ii}}ii}:tifii: iii}'ti•}ii'•ii:
� ? � 9 • .:c.�i::•i:; }.}•.}•.; •.}:.::.;: -.; _ •:::: • •.}•:.}•.�5:•�'{:;:; :�::•:; •:.; � •.;:.}•:::.}r• •.:}•:.}}•:.
' . � .> .. •::L:�rr:%�::5: � r:�:c•}:•i::}�:;.y:{.}:�:�i.�i::;i::'�:�::�i:� �i:�i:Y:�:S�i?:�::�:i�:�>:�:�}:�i: }iYi:�:i;::: �
;� � - ::;':;':??.�:�:::;�::::�:t�::.;�i;::::<:::;:� :::::;;: �::�:�: �::�:; �:;�:::�.2:;i:;:;::::::'t::`{:;::�:�: �:it
�;_ T ?a i .
:::':�«<:::: � � :::<:: ::;: � �.: � :::::«::: � :::::<::::::;:::::<: >;> ::::::::: :::::;<::
, '�/F ` �, i
�
.5
a . .?:�9$`4 ���•
•. e. t?:�'::�::r:; •? ;:�t� �i�: ir:•::�:'�t�:�:
. � s: A � ...................... .....................
� � :::: ;.::::::
� :..::::.:.:...... ....... . ..
:.;:; ....... ......:. :.::::.:::;;:.:.: �
...::: ::.:.:.�:::.�:....
�. � ...::::::::::::::.:.�:::: �..:..
O ........ .. :....._
_. ...........::::..�.�:.::. :.:::: .: .�...::...
>, , ...... ..:: :.. ....
� _ _ ..... .. ..... ... ::::.
� OS / . .... !
° O \ �
.�, �Q .. , , , F� _ 1 ;
, • �,. :,� - - � � „
_ . . , '< >z ?' / ° M�/�O _ ;
_ �`, . P ; � . .OTq , ;
r � �. ,� (
� �. ,
.a , : 'a I ` ; . � ` � i • ra
��°°���� :"� b' ' °.�,� _ SUBJECT PROPEF3TY � yFjGy , I
� -�: 5' �9 �.� $ � : . � �
T �
"�MESLFY L�N[ _ T �
'' NORTH
l•87FN 87?? 'S S} 'f . ti. 1 �:Sc .
••1' �
°� � � . � SCALE 1"=200' /
- � I
' - ! I
� ,, -
• � - I S j � �
_2 � \ .. �� - / / �
• : e � i
an - \ < - I
�c' ��e __ s�' �t �
a-
i39 2av ;¢19S
:,
• _ �"•'' 'I 9S 9S
_o 0
a T ,� ti 7 ti a o
.; 3 ,, L a < / _ o � �
o ,� r N
N fV
1
i �
� � 9 � t o . ��' � ' 341 � s_ -----�
z tl z� s'---- � ,a M ,
OA � � -
�'1 N
/o� io io� ,r � o
/ Y ') p .
� � ,
�' — - -- � � � ~ .
�z �
3 Z � � �
� ' "' Q ^' �P � � � � `J 3 ��- �
� �
� J `'
� I h � i � � ' `
� N a
� � —_ . ' � � `
/ � 7 Q
'' � a ------
/¢p /.5 � '4 �n
'� _� o � o
0
.� , a 3 . � ^ —•- • 997.G : �.:.
a0 � I I T � � (.. / )� � i 4 �I �--'----'----' ' .- '
_1' ,' �'�_`._,�, - .
� ,
� -�--- c �r��a,��
. i r
-'- . I . ,� � WENTWORTH / � ... .
� PARK �.
, / �• C �I i•I � .
' !- - • !• r ' ' • • • • • ' _ � d �o a . • J . '
' / • � � `� I ' � � � ' • . � . � `• � �� , Tl �> • //� �' -,
'` I 1 .. � • "' - '� . ( � • •:.
�•� . � =�y=� - - � � � - � � } :
�, �� . •i i. ;I
�.�ti . / • _ _ • -
RNO • • Q . f • N /
J /
' � � � � � � ./` ' =j%� �. � � � �
. . 1 ,��/_ . .. / ��4 � � .
_ '• _ , _ � i ,
_ i � in s
MENOCTq �iE1GMT5 i � • • -
PAR 3 GOIf COURSE � r� �� I I- � '� f
�i U � N -�� ( vU8UC1 � ` � i � � _l� i ,� ; � .
H a9 � Cf��
�"
— — - - _ - _� ,m .
• • - ' .1 � • (`.-,•\ /_ � � �;..'.. � .- '
� ! � S' '^�' , _ _ • `.is , •` = � - �' � . - \I _ ;.j -- -
� • .i-- "�' . � i -- --- -- �: _ � `. � 0 ..
',\ ' _ ' • � - _ _'% _ � .
\ �' 1 I 1-�i � j � � -• - •- - -- - - - -- - - - -•--- ' '� . � � - -. ; �1 !r . - - -
_� ��' / -� >�s
' t . o '�- � • , � :
/i0a w �N �i _ , --.1_ � _y� �� ,-- • . , 'y� j._L� . ..: - -
�� _ , • i � �� , �--- - • - - - --, �� '.�.: •.
,`• ---�— � i ! � � _- � C:: .
=� � � � � . • . . . . • . .. :.,
-- - - � H - -
, :.
;�-�i • � ....� . . .j.- I ., . i�;�- ". • /;,. � _ _T—
�,� -- -- -- '—, i i , r'—.__ .
��I. � � , - ..-�---� - . . . - i � ��
. . . ��. _ ; . . �� � _ . _ . _ �- .�; � ; - - `_.::..-�........�..::�:n.:� � � - ��
_ ;' . .°—«�-� . : ' : � .:::.:::::;.::�::::`.:.: ._� �
�
-- `� ` � • SUBJECT PROPERTY � � ,.' . W �
>
• ,f � �
� • . � ' �9 S �►'� • � _"_
� J t w� gy*63i r—
t�
-- . � • NORTH �¢ �
�, �,; . � o.. ,
< �.�, • ' . SCALE 1"= 800' -- a -- _
� - i � •";.%� ,' - - - - . -� �;� ; - - --
I . 1
• I � � . � � _.. . , . � , . . � c ;;;:;., ::�... � _>- _
. �,`,_ J 5��� !
WI , �,, r " f �---�--__ _ _a—_.�_ _ ..,�.._ "�� o�l..i �
. '' , , 1 � (f ' ' •.—� i
~ � _ , � U H• R Y �
� �I�\ . . .. !. . ._. . - 5�1 _ CL� -
• _ [.. ..sft'i �\� • . �
- - -_-:_ - /L---• „- --' \� •��•'•;. . _,� � r- � . �- . ___.,-__—�/� ii' ' -
- - - —_ -- - --_ t - `.I '�'� ' _' . � , �—_
= _-- -=-�--�_.- - ,� �--�-- -�:.��_— �—_ - - •-----� �s •.
j —� �� � — �_J � =_ _—' _— _._' - .__;" ' ' ' � ___� `' ' L.
O� `e n � - — - --- ---_" -- ---�— � -• •• •' '
/
�P � I/ �► ` R N � I • ; ' � i! t O• . - --p��-,_ ._ --� .�--�-• - -
.i•�� � � ` . i �.' I (' �, '--ret� �gNE � i .
\
•j (@ I • � � r. � ,
� � � _ I • i - - -- ---•— •-- -- -- � I I �, .
1 � � !-- - �
I :1, L` � . L '� ' n:
� ; - � � I �� ._ -_�- � i. �
� . � ; .�-- �, .
i_ � " �;1 DODGE `-• i NniuRE `_� CENiE.7 � '
^^-^�'"'� � • ■' l —'—' 4 —•---------- I \ �„� ; '---- • � . _--•.
� r � �I � � � � r \L � \ _ _: •~` � • _ ,�
�.�J� ' ,�, : .,• 3 \• } _ `,\ �� l `V�J�-Y _\� -_� N
• • �� e � . - - �oz: :� �
---� ,'i•x;• .��• \ � , \� -� _� � :, • �
� "' . r a � � L!')
.� \�Y Ji � : ` � i , � � I,
} • .�•�� ` i � f\ I
Q �-,: ; ,, J �
-- .3 :.� . � - � � - %-- �.��.,,�. __ � � �
_'� � . . . � � , - - -- -- - --�--- - ---- � _
�-! `t----�--..._._._
0
ZETTER OF INTENT
To: Ntendota Heights Planning Commission
and City Council.
Re: Request by Dennis and Nan Callahan for a we�lands permit.
On October 2, we had a utility shed constructed in out back-
yard. We were told by the man we had hired to do the cement
slab� that he would obtain a building permit from the c�ty.
We assumed he would follow the proper procedure in obtaining
the permit� but apparently he did not. We were also unaware
that we needed a wetlands permit to have this constructed,
until Mr. Dick Gill came to our home on October �. He informed
us at that time that we were in violation of the city ordinance
in placing a permanent structure closer than 100 feet to the
pond in our backyard.
We hereby request your approval for a wetlands permit
for the building constructed on our property.
Respectfully submitted,
� �- �•
�-�.�-.-�, ����:'��
Uennis and � Callahan
C ity o�
.�.1 �. � 1Viendota i-Ieights
Applicant Name:
Address:
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
OF
PLAN1vtING REQ�TEST
Case No. � �-� �
Date of Application �C� '_ �� ! I C� , 1 1�'-I (�
Fee Paid I �1 C7� �['�_� �
�.�.a..l�v ,-Es�---
�jQ.(1 L- , PH: �� % `�! I � L�
(Last) (F"ust) (Mn
(Number & Street)
(City)
(Zip)
.�
OwnerName: jd � (� L1,rA /�,C�.ctii L. ,
(Last) (F'ust) (ivIl) �
Address:
(Number & Street)
�U
55�1 s�
� t d 0 i'C�_ �F-t `�J -`t . J� T 1 8
1 �,� �. �
(City) (Sta t(Zip)
Street Location of Property in Question: !�'`J- � ���C��� Y�� !. �Y' ��(r ,
Legal Description of Property:
Type of Request:
Rezoning
Conditional Use Pemut
� . Conditional Use Permit for P.0 D.
Plan Approval �
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Applicable City,Ordinance Number
Preserit Zoning of Properry Present Use
Proposed Zoning of Property � Proposed Use
Variance
Subdivision Approval .
_� Wedands Permit
Other (attach explanation)
Section
I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional
material are true.
C�.c� � . i� ,. � � c.��.� �
(Signature of Applicant)
. �c�--1���, � �, r� � �
(Date)
� '� ,��� �? � -
(Received by - Title)
1101 Victoria Curve -1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850
I, the undersigned, do hereby give my approval and have no
concerns in regards to the issuance of a wetlands permit to
Dennis and Nan Callahan for the purpose of construction of a
utility shed in their backyard.
- �`
11
�N
•r
�•:
r,.,
�
r�_
.. , ..�: j �•.
�..
. . .. f�5:
:r::
�[f
�Jj (�
'1�t
�cf i�-C
� � ��.�-� ,c.,a.-2—�-�� J
�
CJ` C✓c- �'% � f'�j �/ d
r'"'� ,,�.'�t..�.�. �',--a' �^�,-z-2� ��'�~�- --� �u�C...�-�c�-�.. � ,
l��ti.�- � G�-�l ,,�;+.��� G",���,�--� �'``'" -� ��t�u ,/��--��-�.�c..l��.- ,t:�-�J-Ja�� . .
� ,r
f
��,Nl�.--s�C.,_.- � <�-�--��--�... /�`�—c..`,'t''C�: , . .
�. �J .
r
0
�
C' '�
" %.�,t,,.z-.a�.._. � ,./L�! � �-�Z.�' : '
1 � .
November 27, 1990
Planning Commission
Village of Mendota Heights, Mn
Re: Callahan Petition to Maintain Shed on their property:
Our property is directly behind the Dennis Callahan property, on which
they have constructed a shed to house their gardening equipment. We
in no way find it objectionable, nor do we feel it obstructs any wild
habitat in the area.
We find the timbers also not a problem, these were put there to raise
the beds to prevent the garden from standing in water. �e have main-
tained this area for the past 32 years and are happy that someone has
taken an intrest in keeping this up.
The Callahans in each case have discussed their plans with us in case
we would feel opposed to this type of structure. We are in hopes that
the Commission will not base their decision on one dissenting vote.
Respec'tfully �yours , _
���✓� `
C�
r r/a��` ���.e�,�
�
The Paul Binek's
� C ity o�
.1.. , � 1Viendota Heights
November 29, 1990
Ms. Nan Callahan
1851 Warrior Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Ms. Callahan:
Your application for a We k la.�..5 �.ec-w� �'f" will be
considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled
meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, �eG, y, ��� o The
Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in
the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on
attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive
Council consideration.
The Planning Commission recommended .}�1,.a-4 c� W e�lc��S
P�e rw,. t � �.. � �.�► t-�.�-9 � �, l t� w -F-t,� ��4-�v +-n
�IMGtlV1 0..5 GOKST�i"'UG� VJIi �n �Gf'-�-a-:��a�.c� (��v1�7�'
� \ :�1 �!" V b �
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
(�-J`:-- c�����--
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
1101 Victoria -Curve .• 1Viendota� Heights, 1VIN • 5v118 .:,� 452• 18v0 =-� ti� `: •
Y ' � �
C
i]
Clty O�
.,►., l.l 1Vier�dota %Ieights
November 23, 1990
Ms. Nan Callahan
1851 Warrior Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Ms. Callahan:
Your application for a�ef����5 -(er-v•� c f' will be
considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly
scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, i�o�• 2-� .
The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here
ti�
at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative
should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your
application will receive Commission consideration.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
� �
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
1
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850
�
To:
From:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November 28, 199
Mayor, City Council and City Administrat
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis�� .
Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager
Subject: Preliminary Sketches for Mendakota Park Layout
DISCUSSION
At a special meeting on November 27, 1990, the Parks and
Recreation Commission met with Barry Warner, of Barton-Aschman, to
discuss preliminary sketches for the layout of the ballfields and
other amenities at Mendakota Park. Mr. Warner presented a number
of alternate layouts and the advantages and disadvantages of these
concepts were discussed. (See Parks Minutes, November 27, 1990.)
The consensus of the Parks and Recreation Commission was a
pin-wheel layout of four softball fields at the eastern end of the
site, a parking lot of 100 to 140 spaces at mid site accessing off
Mendakota Drive, a comfort station in the hub of the pinwheel, a
warming house by the free skating area and the neighborhood park
amenities at the west end of the site adjacent to the single family
homes. Trailways connect all areas of the park. �
Mr. Warner was directed to prepare a more detailed final
preliminary sketch plan based on this preferred layout for
presentation at the December 4, 1990 City Council meeting.
Commission Chair John Huber and Guy Kullander will be presenting
this preferred plan to City Council, as Mr. Warner will be out of
town. Barton-Aschman will be preparing preliminary cost estimates
on the preferred plan, which will be available for discussion at
the meeting.
ACTION REQUIRED
Review and discuss .the Parks and Recreation Commission's
preferred preliminary plan and provide the Commission with any
suggestions or direction.
NOTE: The Parks and Recreation Commission meets on December 11,
1990 to determine the final complex layout in preparation
of requesting that the City Council order final plans and
specifications.
;
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
111 Third Avenue South, Suite 350 Phone: (612) 332-0421
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Fax: (612) 332-6180
USA
MEMORANDUM T0:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City of Mendota Heights
Barry Warner
December 4, 1990
Mendakota Ballfield Complex - Preliminary Cost Estimate
Please find attached a preliminary cost estimate for the Mendakota Ballfield
Complex. The purpose of this estimate is to provide a decision-making tool as
a part of the preliminary design process. The cost estimate is based upon the
preferred design alternative and its certainty is reflective of that level of
detail.
Several assumptions were made during the cost estimate's preparation. These
include: �
1.
2.
3.
4.
J
Four irrigated softball fields and one irrigated soccer field will be
constructed.
Off-street parking will be provided to meet a majority of the parking
demand.
Neighborhood park elements are included in the project to broaden the
facility's use and encourage multi-season activities.
Unit costs for line items are based upon recent experience with the
Sibley Athletic Complex and other neighborhood park projects.
5. Specific quantities for grading, utilities, and similar items have not
been completed. Therefore, estimates have been established for these
values based upon the preferred design alternative.
6. The project's development program is subject to change based upon
participation from City Council, Park Commission and staff. This
participation will in turn alter the project's eventual development
cost.
kro
�
�
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE - MENDAKOTA BALLFIELD COMPLEX December 4, 1990
Estimated Unit Total
No. Item Unit Quantit Cost Cost
l. Mobilization LS 1 $ -- S --
2. Clearing, Grubbing and Removals LS 1 7,500.00 7,500
3. Excavation and Embankment CY 50,000 1.75 87,500
4. Topsoil Borrow CY 5,500 6.50 35,750
5. 4" DIP (water) LF 430 18.50 7,955
6. 6" PVC (sanitary sewer) LF 430 12.00 5,160
7. Manhole (sanitary sewer) � EA 1 1,250.00 1,250
8. 15" RCP CL II LF 550 15.00 8,250
9. Catch Basin (storm sewer) EA 6 1,250.00 7,500
10. Ballfield Fencing - 4 Softball Fields LS 1 65,000.00 65,000
11. Edge Fencing - Adjacent Dodd Road LF 775 11.00 8,525
12. 8 Ft. Wide Bituminous Trail LF 2,800 6.00 16,800
13. Parking Lot (98 spaces) w/Curb and Gutter LS 1 147,000.00 147,000
14. Parking Lot (6 spaces) w/Curb and Gutter LS 1 12,000.00 12,000
15. Ballfield Seeding AC 8.5 1,400.00 11,900
16. Site Seeding AC 8.0 1,400.00 11,200
17. Aglime Surface (infields, etc.) TON 2,000 13.00 26,000
18. Irrigation - 4 Softball, 1 Soccer LS 1 37,500.00 37,500
19. Portable Bleachers - 4 Units � LS 1 16,000.00 16,000
20. Players Benches EA 20 600.00 12,000
21. Handicap Playstructure LS 1 20,000.00 2U,000
22. Playstructure - Ballfield Complex LS 1 10,000.00 10,000
23. Swingset EA 1 1,200.00 1,200
24. Spring Animals/Diggers EA 6 500.00 3,000
25. Park Benches EA 8 500.00 4,000
26. Trash Receptacles EA� 10 300.00 3,000
27. Hard Court - Concrete EA 1 7,000.00 7,000
28. Bike Racks EA 3 350.00 1,050
29. Picnic(Shelter - Prefabricated EA 1 10,000.00 10,000
30. Storage and Concessions Building EA 1 60,000.00 60,000
31. Portable Warming House EA 1 5,000.00 5,000
32. Security Lighting EA 4 1,500.00 6,000
33. Landscaping LS 1 25,000.00 25.000
SUBTOTAL �680,040
5% CONTINGENCY 34.000
-
TOTAL $714,040
�! �
�
From:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 4, 1990
Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager
Subject: 1990 Expenditures for Park Improvements
DISCUSSION
As of November 1, 1990 approximately $1,998,000.00 has been
expended or committed towards park improvements.
Land Purchase•
Overhead•
Construction•
Bondina•
FIINDING
Sibley
Mendakota
Staff
Consultants
Architects
Sibley
Trails
Parks
Park Improv.
$
$112,000
$525,000
$637,000
$196,400
$ 38,100
$ 6,500
$241,000
$401,400
$332,000
$340,400
$ 32,300
1,106,000
$ 637,000
$ 241,000
$ 1,106,000
$ 14,000
$ 1,998,000
Funding for the above expenditures came from Issue #1 of the
Referendum. To this $2.7 million can be added $98,000 of M.S.A.
and County cost sharing funds, plus $6,000 from School District
#197 for requested additional work resulting in a total of
$2,804,000.00 that can be applied towards park improvements..
. ,
Recognizing the above expenditures, the uncommitted balance for
Issue #1 is as follows: �
Beginning Allocation $2,804,000 �
Expenditures 1,998,000 �
Uncommitted balance $ 806,000 �
i
i
Other park related funding sources include:
Issue #2
Special Park Fund
$ 700,000
325,000
$1,025,000
for a total uncommitted amount of $1,831,000 ($806,000 +
$1,025,000). In the past, the City has been very cautious in
expending funds from the Special Park Fund due to unknown future
park needs. The Special Park Fund has been built over the years
with developer cash park dedications.
Future improvements to be funded from Referendum Issue #1 are:
* Minor ballfield improvements in existing parks
* Walking trails - approximately 6 to 9 miles during next five
years (Some sections will be paid for as part of highway
improvements)
* Paths and viewing blind in Friendly Marsh Park
COMPARISION OF BIIDGET AND EXPENDITIIRE3
The following table compares the amounts budgeted in the referendum
to actual expenditures:
BUDGETED SPENT REMAINING OVER
&7DG�.�'I'
Upgrade improvements
to existing parks $ 49,000 $ 36,000 $ 13,000 -
Sibley Complex
(Includes land)
New/Existing Park
Improvements
Trails
Kensington
$498,000
$393,000
$598,000
, $546,000
$595,000 0
$396,000 0
$407,000 $191,000
$ 25,000 $521,000
Mendakota: Land $500,000 $525,000 0
Improvements $116,000 0 $116,000
$ 2,700,000 $1,984,000 $841,000
Bonding Costs: $ 14,000
$1,998,000
$�1�000
$ 3�000
�,�
$125,000
The last two columns in the above table represent possible costs to
the City in the total amount of $966,000 ($841,000 +$125,000). In
addition, construction costs at Mendakota above and beyond the
$116,000 noted in the table would also be an added City cost.
SUMMARY
To summarize, the remaining funds and the potential future costs
tally as follows:
Remaining Funds
Balance Issue #1
Issue #2
Special Park Fund
Total
Potential Future Costs
Remaining Amount
Over Budget Amount
Mendakota Park Work
Total
$ 806,000
$ 700,000
$ 325,000
$1,831,000
$ 841,000
$. 125,000
�
$ 966,000 + ?
Additional information on the estimated costs for developing
Mendakota Park will be presented to Council this evening.
ACTION REQUIRED
Council should designate funding source(s) for Mendakota Park
Improvements, either tonight or on December 18, 1990 when the final
schematic will be on the agenda. �
t
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 4, 1990
To: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager
SU&TECT: Status of Consultants Compensation
In October, 1989 the City entered into an agreement with
Barton Ashman Associates, Inc. to assist the City with Park
Planning and to perform certain design services. As of
September 7, 1990, they have billed the City $38,108.59,
which is 54% of the $70,800 contract amount.
The contract was broken into four segments:
Budqet Billed Balance
New & Existing Neighborhood
Parks $11,100
Kennsington Park
($3500 arch. fee) 23,700
Sibley Park
($5000 arch. fee) 22,900
Mendakota Park
$10,226.12 $ 873.88
8,552.52 15,147.48
19,329.95 3,570.05
($3500 arch. fee) 25,100 0.00 25,100.00
$82,800 $38,108.59 $44,691.41
$12,000 was allocated to architectural fees for the three
comfort stations.
cc: Park and Recreation Commission Members �
;
:�
t , �
�arton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
111 Third Avenue South, Suite 350
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
USA
MEMORANDUM T0:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Phone: (612) 332-0421
Fax: (612) 332-6180
City of Mendota Heights
Barry Warner
December 4, 1990
Mendakota Ballfield Complex - Preliminary Cost Estimate
Please find attached a preliminary cost estimate for the Mendakota Ballfield
Complex. The purpose of this estimate is to provide a decision-making tool as
a part of the preliminary design process. The cost estimate is based upon the
preferred design alternative and its certainty is reflective of that level of
detail.
Several assumptions were made during the cost estimate's preparation. These
include:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Four irrigated softball fields and one irrigated soccer field will be
constructed.
Off-street parking will be provided to meet a majority of the parking
demand.
Neighborhood park elements are included in the project to broaden the
facility's use and encourage multi-season activities.
Unit costs for line items are based upon recent experience with the
Sibley Athletic Complex and other neighborhood park projects.
5. Specific quantities for grading, utilities, and similar items have not
been completed. Therefore, estimates have been established for these
values based upon the preferred design alternative.
6. The project's development program is subject to change based upon
participation from City Council, Park Commission and staff. This
participation will in turn alter the project's eventual development
cost.
kro
�
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE - MENDAKOTA BALLFIELD COMPLEX December 4, 1990
Estimated Unit Total
No. Item Unit Quantit Cost Cost
1. Mobilization LS 1 $ -- $ --
2. Clearing, Grubbing and Removals LS 1 7,500.00 7,500
3. Excavation and Embankment CY 50,000 1.75 87,500
4. Topsoil Borrow CY 5,500 6.50 35,750
5. 4" DIP (water) LF 430 18.50 7,955
6. 6" PVC (sanitary sewer) LF 430 12.00 5,160
7. Manhole (sanitary sewer) EA 1 1,250.00 1,250
8. 15" RCP CL II LF 550 15.00 8,250
9. Catch Basin (storm sewer) EA 6 1,250.00 7,500
10. Ballfield Fencing - 4 Softball Fields LS 1 65,000.00 65,000
11. Edge Fencing - Adjacent Dodd Road LF 775 11.00 8,525
12. 8 Ft. Wide Bituminous Trail LF 2,800 6.00 16,800
13. Parking Lot (98 spaces) w/Curb and Gutter LS 1 147,000.00 147,000
14. Parking Lot (6 spaces) w/Curb and Gutter LS 1 12,000.00 12,000
15. Ballfield Seeding AC 8.5 1,400.00 11,900
16. Site Seeding AC 8.0 1,400.00 11,200
17. Aglime Surface (infields, etc.) TON 2,000 13.00 26,000
18. Irrigation - 4 Softball, 1 Soccer LS 1 37,500.00 37,500
19. Portable Bleachers - 4 Units LS 1 16,000.00 16,000
20. Players Benches EA 20 600.00 12,000
21. Handicap Playstructure LS 1 20,000.00 20,000
22. Playstructure - Ballfield Complex LS 1 10,000.00 10,000
23. Swingset EA 1 1,200.00 1,200
24. Spring Animals/Diggers EA 6 500.00 3,000
25. Park Benches EA 8 500.00 4,000
26. Trash Receptacles EA 10 300.00 3,000
27. Hard Court - Concrete EA 1 7,000.00 7,000
28. Bike Racks EA 3 350.00 1,050
29. Picnic Shelter - Prefabricated EA 1 10,000.00 10,000
30. Storage and Concessions Building EA 1 60,000.00 60,000
31. Portable Warming House EA 1 5,000.00 5,000
32. Security Lighting EA 4 1,500.00 6,000
33. Landscaping LS 1 25,000.00 25,000
SUBTOTAL a680,040
59'o CONTINGENCY 34_
TOTAL $714,040
���
...
..� ...
�. . • .-
..: �._
.�
�
, � �-� s►. `� ��
. . �.� i�J —
� � _�= c�� r � c- `c ��� r ��r��`��1�. `�
� �� - : �,�►����'� �,`�`�d i ►�`� '� �,?\►��� ` ��.
�
�� !�,,� �` �j�'� - e� �1� � ��► ��
• . • '► ` /�,�"',a � �• t�Q•�.
, 71`- �j .
n /! � 7 =.� � � � �
�IRIiI rt'� r - ��� � . ,:r • �r. 2� � <•• ���� ���,� � •
��= � ..,,`�[� ���
,� ,�;,,.._ a�t. � � . ,1�i� 1'� �/�.� ,e�'a�: � �
� ` �� �'� , i �•a, � �; � ���`�� � � :
.�� . • �, � � .
Y i N�, : , �y% •a��� % ��Ts r� �;�; � �E
• ��' �� �:� ' .,s�,� : �l�a� �� ��. .�„ �,
�,;�` ..�t�.,� �.�/••;',t• �!/�jv, ,.k
� � � ;�� i, �f�� • � � �\ ; ,,����i ,�� I
q��� S � • , I,r . r. M�.> ' ! .����� J� �
a �� � � � =�' ` ���I , � 1 ��' �ii� �
• � ♦ P ��ti'' � ,/�� �C�% ` �� f1 ��; ���'� �y - �•I
�:M:: ��,: �;�� , �: ,��� ,,..,,s ��i
� � % ' �;, � �: •.. ....=tii-y ` < �►
.� � ;: •�y ��-.f���= •,
�1,t t •e �:!. .• lil � � � J �� •
�+ :�Kr �::;��._ �f!►� . . ��
�� —��� �ui+�� �` — � �..,,. ,
. , ���., �+ ��; .;,�:.: : .,�r .-�- .
�: ' W �'j�' �,•-�- �.. ����
•, ;,- ��r�� ��`� •1�' � ' � ��
��� � . , e.c. il`:'� ••`•• �,�,,��1�,, �
�'..� - �. ��°�',• � ''�� L ���t
`` 1�;`•� ��'� ■ ��,
�.
/ ' : - . '— ,- ` _'� ` r—` . . _ _ . .- ; _ • . , ;
� 1 �i�� :� :: ' iCN�C____ � \\` y- :� � \ : -� _ � � ' •. . . ;—• , - • :'�-.� �K •:�--- i� ;
. � + � \ : ',-� �' : + - . � � � � �-- � � ,
�'- . R - \ \ \\\ `; -Y"' ..�., �l� °�"�" . .'�. f + f" .'�^' � �
/ \\ ` �: �:4 �Fi� �. `\ �\ � ' , wvwenz • � \ � � . f
' •� �, • .' � I .
� � " `. COUR • VOF:LEYB LL : � � � : ,. �� _�+^ ; I � � �
. .. . L:- +/ � ! �
= J �C� � •� � �d�==-�_-=__-- � :- -- t . ,E,�, / ' �
' �. ,� ., a .r.-ttKRtiM�'__� ______� inc.aoz�, \ • � � �
.. �.... , ' _ -' _��-_"`"" , . nv..wac � � � � : . ; i
wa
_"'__�L.I.A_'Jr'_4T-��� _�.'_ � . // ,r�--'�. 1 ` „:\•; � \ \ I '. t i
� . _ "i:. / � • • .
/ , 1 r 1 � �
�'' . _ �` . • ��✓� �� `� � ,�� 4 �� �`• '•�SOC ' . �''SOFTBALL # 4 ti �OFTBALL #4 � i �
_ � - � � :/ � i` " eR ~ � 180Ff 32 . � � - •� . �+ �, • � i
�) /)J,. ,,4 �� . . =-� > > i � � ��� � � �, � . . ; : ,
��` •��'' • /p / « `�� `��• : .• S / �• • \ \\ . j I � � !
�,�/ w / � � � .
\ "• /! � / ' ,' �.� •
/ / .y.-. �r,� �—, —�+�-�.�•�`' _1' � ' , . f \\\ � ` ( 1� i
* � %�� �i � _. � :��� �� �O � �\\\ ��i � M' \` . . - • �� 1
� �� � � „ � � /; � \\ �
t> J / � w � �' � ��I
/���//��� ,, % • � �% I • '. NORTHERN $'fATES POWER COMPANY \\ ,1 ��. � I � \ � , / _ - \ , I
.� t �i
q"�// ��� �• i� j• OO \\ \1.+ :.1 ' . ., `� J ' -sr ` ,\\ • . ; i ; �
'�r s�� �- -� 1'. TO S1W% COURTI; � -` � � ' � 1 !� �,( � I -c _ l/ \ - T l'~ ' � \ \ \ � ' i � �I �
V// �/ /, / '' ' — � \ i� . � ! \ � r r{tiTM OYERHEAD � � .. ' j I �� '
r,,/ r � , �� % .;' . , �, ,� ,`�,, �.b - ' - � • - - .. r i . \\,; �, ; : , ;
�V,� / �i � _ � — — � �� \ j � 1 n �� • • _ . j' - , ' f `\� � � � I
� ' / � � 1 i � � � . � "� \ \ �� � I
i,f � j , ' ----------- -, . � ,,� � . . _ • f t
/ � � � S . 1, � � � 1 . . . • ..;• ' / -60C i ' 1 �
1 �'� � �� • � YI � � • 1 ,� }/.�1 ... - . _ � : . ' . . . . � �
-__ �/ � /f f�_" � . � ,� . ,\ � . • ` \ 7
� Ta-� � ' • - '- " ' � . NONTHfR1�l-8'TATES PON'�R ""� _ • \ \ � �
� - ���,� j � ' _'_" ___" '_ � 1 1, ����.icc.eea7 : �� � � \ � \ ` o � I
�'' i' /' p � _ ! ;� �� wa,�a /p r � —� `� �\ �
/ � � � '------• --- ; , . , �� .. � �- � � \ � � � .
%"o � __ ` \ :_ � � \ � -` ; > \ � I
ft � ; ' .- � � � \ ', ' ,. �° �� � � ,% ..� � ' j� � �
� :. . "° �
j � � , I � `' ----- ------. ; . ` \ � \ \� �.\ 1 � �..� � ��\�� —�.�°°/ �-�/ / _� f '� � �
. . .
� � : ; ------ ._.__� �. �� -/ ---�------l=}�'--- � 7�-- �- � -�---~�'--?�-- - - �'----------- ---� �-----� -- ----�` ---- ' � .
,
; , . � -------- ; — --- — — � --- ! t
' ' 1'" �` --- -- ----- ---- - ----�_- _ --�---�;- ----`---- ----->----------- -�-__
-._ --• --- — — — � — —� - - - `,` ' b:�� _ � ��\` � i ' � ��i' � 1 i
/ . CDe_j _r �__ .__ _� _� � \ 1\ 1 1 � ' . i , ( i + i � i
• 1 � � 1 :1 ' : ' � i i ' �2U � io eo :
. PREFERRED DESIGN ALTERNATIVE��- � `
SCALE
AS
SNONt�
�r.w� . s wn.�rs i a uw[i.. e�iti-'�i
�..a..w.a+ ua.�`i.a � v .K �1
scrt a�.wcn� O m�9�T'iOf1 �.w�S�Yi1�1 � kIC•
FIIE NO. � SMEEi
NDAKOTA BALLFIELD COMPLEX� "°.
MENDOTA HEIGHTS. MINNESOTA - �"TE
O[C. 4 ��O ��