The URL can be used to link to this page

1990-02-067om � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA FEBRUARY 6, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Agenda Adoption. 4. Approval of January 16th Minutes. 5. Consent Calendar � a. Acknowledgment of the January 23rd Planning Commission Minutes. b. Acknowledgment of January Building Report. c. Acknowledgment of Police Department's Annual _ Report. � d. Approval to Purchase Pickup with Plow. e. Approval to Purchase New Squad Cars. f. Approval to Increase City Mileage Reimbursement Rate. g. Approval of RESOLUTION NO. 90-03, Revising Administrative and Engineering Fees. h. Approval of Full Time Employment of Kevin Batchelder , (See Memo on Add-On Ac�enda - Tuesday) . i. Approval of Tax Forfeit Property Classification. - j. Approval of Polling Place Designation - � RESOLUTION NO. 90-04. i. Approval of the List of Contractors. j. Approval of the List of Claims. � ' End of Consent Calendar 6. Proclamation a. Proclamation of March 4-11 as Volunteers of America Week. 7. Public Comments a. Bike Trail Complaint - Mr. and Mrs. Bozivich will be present. 8. HEARINGS• a. CASE NO. 89-40, Frye - CAO Variance - 7:45 P.M. (Recommend Continuing to March 6th at 8:00 P.M.) b. CASE NO. 89-25: Dodge Nature Center - CUP for PUD - 8:00 P.M. , c. Wagon Wheel Trail Feasibility Hearing (Continued) - 8:00 P.M. - RESOLUTION NO. 90-05 d. CASE NO. 90-02: Mendota Heights Animal Hospital CUP - 8:30 P.M. - RESOLUTION NO. 90-06 � � 8. Unfinished and New Business a. CASE NO. 90-01: Posthumus - Variance. b. Garron Feasibility Report Update - RESOLUTION NO. 90-07 c. Report on Additional MSA Street Designation. RESOLUTION NO. 90-08 �A�� - d. Status of City Acquired Properties. e. Lexington Heights Apartment Revenue Bonds - RESOLUTION NO. 90-09. f. Recognition of Parks Commissioners. 9. Council Comments 10. Adjourn CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Eu �iu[�7 February 6, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Public or D' tor SUBJECT: Add on Agenda for February , 1990 3. AQenda Adoption There are no add on agenda items for tonights meeting. Council can adopt the blue agenda. 5h. Approval of full-time employment of Kevin Batchelder. Attached is a memo recommending Kevin's appointment to full-time status. Attachment e � Y CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO February 6, 1990 TO: FROM: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator James E. Danielson Public Works Director SU&TECT: Kevin Batchelder's Probation DISCUSSION• Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder's one year probation ended on January 3, 1990. Kevin now needs to be appointed to perma- nent status. During his first year with the City, Mendota Heights has been a busy place and Kevin has been involved in many different projects. Kevin has performed in an excellent fashion in completing all of his duties. The following are list of his projects that par- ticularly stand out in my mind: 1. 2. 3. Recyclinq Kevin single handedly designed and implemented the curb side recycling program in Mendota Heights. Due to Kevin's efforts Mendota Heights Curb Side Recycling was fully imple- mented on schedule April 1, 1989. The City then met its recycling goal of nine percent for 1989 allowing the program to be fully funded by the County. Hirina of New Administrator After Kevin Frazell left last September several of us had to put forth a lot of extra effort to pick up his duties. Kevin Did more than his share of those tasks, putting in many extra hours during the week and on the weekends. To further complicate things for Kevin, he also got married during this period and was the lead staff person in hiring a new administrator. This was an extremely stressful time for Kevin. He withstood the pressure and did an outstanding job. Plannina Support I have been the lead staff person working with Howard Dahl- gren on the planning cases. It was a extra duty that was consuming a large amount of my time. With all the planning activity going on it seemed that I was barely able to keep up. When Kevin was hired he was to try and relieve me of some of those duties. Kevin has done an excellent job in this area. He instituted a tracking system for the planning cases, takes notes at Howard's meetings, prepares a biweekly synopsis for the Friday News, designed a new form to dis- tribute to the applicants that clearly describes their process through the City, and he has revised and updated the application forms and procedures. He is currently preparing an operation manual for planning. ; f 4. Park and Recreation Support Kevin provides the staff support for.the Park and Recreation Commission. Kevin Frazell guided the Commission through a successful Park Bond Referendum and Kevin Batchelder has picked up where Kevin left off and he is guiding them through the implementation process. 5. General Support Besides the above mentioned major tasks Kevin eagerly helps out in many other areas such as airport noise, personnel actions, budget preparation, etc. RECOMMENDATION• Kevin Batchelder has been a most valuable and needed addition to the Mendota Heights staff and I have been highly impressed with his performance. I recommend that he be appointed to full-time status immediately. ACTION RE4UIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should pass a motion appointing Kevin Batchelder to full-time status. JED:dfw Page No. 2693 January 16, 1990 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, January 16, 1990 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Anderson, Blesener, and Hartmann. Councilmember Cummins had notified the Council that he would be absent. AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of the revised agenda for the meeting. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of the minutes of the January 2nd regular meeting. Councilmember Anderson seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of the consent calendar for the meeting along with authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein. a. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the January 9th Park and Recreation Commission meeting. b. Acknowledgment of the quarterly Engineer's Proj ect Report � c. Acknowledgment of the Code Enforcement monthly report for December. d. Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's monthly report for December. e. Acknowledgment of the Fire Department monthly report for December. f. Acknowledgment of a letter from St. Paul Water informing Council that there will be no increase in water rates for 1990. � Page No. 2694 January 16, 1990 g. Authorization for the purchase of an Apple � Macintosh IIcx computer and peripheral equipment for the Police Department through the State Contract with Apple Computers, for a cost of $5,378.20. h. Authorization for the Police Department to begin the process for selection of a new police officer. i. Authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute labor agreements for 1990 with the Minnesota Teamsters Local 320 and Law Enforcement Labor Services. j. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-02, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING ELECTION OF MICHAEL THOMAS LAWELL TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION." k. Authorization for the issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $6,500 to Business Records Corporation for the purchase of an Optech III-P optical scan ballot reader. l. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated January 16, 1990 and attached hereto. m. Approval of the list of claims dated January 16, 1990 and totalling $1,524,951.31. n. Approval of the permanent full-time appointment of Duane Toenyan in the Street Department. o. Authorization for the Mayor to execute the amended Joint Powers Agreement with Dakota � County for the 1990 recycling program. Councilmember Anderson seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 FURLONG AREA Council acknowledged a letter from Mr. and Mrs. David Hiner, 1312 Furlong Avenue requesting the opportunity to discuss the Furlong area property acquisitions. Council also acknowledged an associated report from Public Works Director Danielson. Page No. 2695 January 16, 1990 Mrs. Carmel Hiner, 1312 Furlong, read a letter dated January 16, 1990, and submitted by 25 neighborhood property owners, containing a ten-point list of neighborhood buyout requirements. She asked what the City is going to do about the area's sewer problems, commenting that there is raw sewage in the area. Mayor Mertensotto responded that there is a City ordinance addressing such problems, and that the City will attempt to catch the people who are pumping. He informed the audience that Council has been working with the residents: about six months ago, the majority of the residents indicated that they did not want to be bought out. He further stated that when the buyout program idea was dropped, it was because the neighborhood asked Council to do so. He stated that there is no statutory requirement for the City to do anything, but that Council realizes that it is prohibitive for those with sewer and water problems to replace those facilities. The City has done feasibility studies to bring utilities into the neighborhood. The cost for the utilities was approximately $25,000 per lot, and the City had offered to use tax increment monies to grant each homeowner about $10,000 to reduce their proposed assessment. He stated that Council was told by the residents that they did not want to spend $15,000 for the utilities. Several people then indicated that they did not have the financing necessary to relieve their utility problems: at that time the City offered to purchase three to four homes a year, as money was available. Public Works Director Danielson stated that two homes have been purchased and that the County is investigating the utility problems for two other homeowners currently. Mayor Mertensotto pointed that by their letters, the neighborhood is asking Council to do something which there is no money available for. The City has asked MAC about a buyout possibility, and MAC has responded that they have no funds. In response to a comment from Mrs. Hiner that the neighborhood is in the MAC buyout program when funds become available, Mayor Mertensotto stated that the City will forward a letter to MAC stating that the Page No. 2696 January 16, 1990 neighborhood has asked the City to petition MAC to buy them out. Mrs. Hiner informed Council that the residents have been told by the health department that there is toxic waste in the neighborhood. Mayor Mertensotto indicated that the Council would be willing to pursue the toxic waste issue, but stated that the last time the neighborhood asked the City to work out a buyout program, about 9 to 10 people indicated that their utilities were not up to code. The majority of the Furlong Area residents indicated to Council that they wanted to BE part of a buyout. Mrs. Hiner responded that the neighborhood would be acceptable to a buyout on the terms contained in their letter. Mayor Mertensotto informed the audience that it would take a$25 to $30 million new development to support a tax increment large enough for a total buyout. He stated that no developers have expressed interest in the area. He indicated that Council is willing to help the residents, but that there must be a consensus from the neighborhood and there must be cooperation. , Mr. Doug Guyer, 1309 Kendon informed Council that his home has been for sale since August 4th, and distributed a statement from his real estate agent on why the home has not sold. Councilmember Blesener stated that the issues the neighborhood raises now are those that Council has been trying to deal with. At the meeting last summer, the neighborhood told Council to leave them alone, that they didn't want to be bought out. She asked City Attorney Hart if the Council were to set up a committee to meet with the neighborhood and come up with parameters for an agreement, would Council be getting itself into condemnation posture. Mr. Hart responded that the process of negotiation would not place the City in a condemnation posture, but that without consensus of the neighborhood, if the City acquires more homes it may have a negative impact on remaining property values. Page No. 2697 January 16, 1990 Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the City does not have a project in process. Councilmember Blesener felt that Council should ask the neighborhood to form a small committee to meet with staff and try to find general parameters that everyone can live with, and that Council should then try to aggressively pursue some source of funding. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that buyout is strictly voluntary now - the City may not be able to find funding to buy out more than three to four homes a year. Councilmember Anderson stated that in his judgment the way the City is currently proceeding, buying 2 to 3 homes a year through tax increment funding, is the worst way to proceed. The point will be reached when there are more open lots, causing reduced property values for the remaining homes. He felt that a program either has to be comprehensive or the City should stop purchasing homes in the area. Mayor Mertensotto observed that when the hearings with the neighborhood were conducted it was the general consensus that the houses were not marketable. Mr. Hiner responded that airport noise is not affecting the salability of the neighborhood - sewer and water problems are. s Councilmember Blesener felt that the neighborhood should decide if they want to be bought out or not and then the City should look for a developer or another agency to do the buyout. She further felt the City should spend the time to try to work out an understanding with the neighborhood, since the approach Council has been taking is not acceptable to the neighborhood. Councilmember Anderson felt that the recent adverse publicity is destroying the salability of the properties. He felt there are many homeowners who would stay in the area if they knew what was going to happen in the future, and that piecemeal buyout is a bad idea. Ms. Mary Schwartz, 1286 Kendon, agreed that the piecemeal approach is destroying property values. Page No. 2698 January 16, 1990 Councilmember Anderson pointed out that Council represents the entire City, including people who do not have similar problems. Owning a home requires maintenance, but unfortunately in this neighborhood, the maintenance cost is very expensive. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the residents have totally reversed on the issue - they are now saying that because the City has taken two homes and is considering acquiring two more, the neighborhood is being destroyed. Mr. Robert Tousignant, 1300 Furlong, suggested that the important i�ssue is that when the neighborhood came before Council on July 12, 1989, the understanding was that the buyout process had been totally stopped, but then it immediately continued. At the request of the City, the County surveyed the neighborhood and the City bought two lots and negotiated for two others - that takes the neighborhood out of control. The residents are at the mercy of the Council, since the City is the only buyer. He asked for the long term plan for the lots the City bought - are the lots going to sit vacant for 25 years? Councilmember Anderson pointed out that Council must have a consensus from the neighborhood. If there are people dumping raw sewage the neighborhood should report it. He suggested that the neighborhood should come up with some ideas as to how to treat the problem, and pointed out that there is no plan for a total buyout - only those properties with serious problems are considered. He felt that it was apparent that those with serious sewer problems are not willing to pay to maintain their sewage systems, and pointed out that the City is not in the real estate business. Mr. Tousignant stated that the solutions are complicated, and suggested that the Council and neighborhood should try to determine which areas they agree on and which they do not. Mayor Mertensotto responded that Council has tried that approach and could not get a consensus from the neighbors, who were fighting amongst themselves. He pointed out that people were pleading with Council to buy them out because of their utility problems. Page No. 2699 January 16, 1990 Councilmember Hartmann pointed out that the residents knew at the July, 1989 meeting that the City was not proceeding in a buyout program and that only those with serious health risk problems, as determined by the County Health Department, would be bought. The residents understood that this would be the City's approach, and Council has not changed the game plan. Councilmember Blesener stated that there is a d i 1 emma ,��-s�-�� '---�- L��i t�s af t h P neighbor�ood!s_ doi.r),q.__--ratY�er; -the-�iinpact o� ' ose omes wi h �ri o�sewer �.,-�h}��. She stated that the residents are willing to be bought out if they have an understanding of what the buyout would be, and felt that Council should pursue terms for a general agreement. She felt that something should be put in writing on what the City would do if it could find funding. Councilmember Anderson responded that the City is not in a financial position to buy out the entire neighborhood. He felt that a written statement would have a chilling effect on the neighborhood in the long run. Two homeowners have had insurmountable utility problems, and two more appear to have the same problems. The only thing that makes sense is a comprehensive purchase plan, and there is no funding available. He felt that dedicating a lot of staff time at this time would not be realistic, and would create unrealistic expectations from the neighborhood, since there is no developer interested in the property and no City funding. Councilmember Hartmann stated that the City can contact the MAC to see if that agency has funds available for a buyout, and the other option is to explore Superfund as a potential, although he is not aware of toxic waste in the area. Councilmember Anderson strongly urged Council to immediately discontinue purchasing homes, and pointed out that the two which have already been purchased were absolutely out of the question in terms of rehabilitation. Margaret Swenson, 1294 Kendon Lane, stated that the majority of the people want to sell out, but the main issue boils down to fair Page No. 2700 January 16, 1990 market value. She stated that she would like to sell her house now and cannot wait because of the sewer and water problems. She felt that the neighborhood should be sympathetic to those who have serious utility problems. Katherine Max, 1284 Lakeview, stated that she is one of two or three homeowners who do not want to sell. She stated that the only thing she is afraid of is that the others want to sell out and that the City is going to take her home. Mr. Hiner pointed out that one of the homes purchased by the City across Highway 55 has an open basement. Mayor Mertensotto informed Mr. Hiner that the City will inspect the site and also will follow through with MAC and the Superfund. He suggested that another approach to the issue might be special legislation, and suggested that the neighborhood contact their legislators for special legislation to authorize the City to issue bonds to buy out the neighborhood. He explained that Council would like to help the residents but that their cooperation is necessary. He pointed out that the City does not want to force anyone out of their homes, but rather than Council wanted to help those with contaminated sewer and water systems. An unidentified audience member stated that some of the residents cannot afford to fix their utility systems. He felt that the City should have its health officer check the neighborhood. He stated that the children in the neighborhood cannot be supervised all of the time, that they do not know enough to stay away from raw sewage. He felt that the City should either condemn the homes with sewer problems or buy all of the homes. Councilmember Blesener suggested continuing the approach of buying out the homes with serious sewer problems and at the same time try to come to agreement with the other residents on terms for a buyout at such time as funds become available. Mary Schwartz felt that the City should condemn the houses with serious problems and clean out the neighborhood so that the rest of Page No. 2701 January 16, 1990 the residents can stay in their homes if they want to. Councilmember Blesener moved that a committee of Council, staff and the neighborhood be formed to negotiate to draft a general outline for terms to buyout the neighborhood, conditioned upon future funding which has yet to be determined. The motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Tousignant stated that Council is destroying the value of the neighborhood. Mayor Mertensotto responded that if the neighborhood feels the buyout of the homes with serious problems is detrimental to the neighborhood, perhaps Council should stop the buyouts. Mr. Guyer stated that this is not what the neighborhood is asking. Mrs. Doffing, 1314 Furlong', stated that her home has been up for sale since July and no one has been even willing to look at it. She felt that not buying out those homes with serious problems now would be wrong. She informed Council that at the last neighborhood meeting, the group felt that they wish Council to consider a buyout, preferably all at one time, but even one at a time if necessary. They just want some parameters: some people in the neighborhood do need help and everyone hopes the City will give them help. She stated that the residents want Council to continue buying the problem homes, but those who don't have problems just want to protect their interest as well. Jim Schwartz, 1286 Kendon, stated that when the City first considered buyout the Council was talking about condemnation procedures with 20% relocation and ability to contest the value with independent appraisals. All of a sudden when the City started the buy out those issues were dropped. He informed Council that he built his home 5 years ago and does not believe his property has any value now. He pointed out that when the Dahlgren study was done two years ago, the City did promotional brochures on the neighborhood, and Mr. Hiner sold his old home in the neighborhood in ten days for a good price. Now, after all of the Ayes: 3 Nays: 1 Blesener Page No. 2702 January 16, 1990 buyout talk, two neighbors have had their homes for sale for six months with no success. He felt that the sewer problem is having an adverse affect but more of the affect is because of the buyout, and the City actively pursuing developers. He felt that cancelling the program will not make market values come back. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the City is not pursuing a developer and that the brochure was prepared in the past to see if there was a market. Councilmember Anderson pointed out that the basic premise of one recent news article was that the City's piecemeal buyout was destroying the neighborhood; the second news article said the people were pumping sewage onto the street. He also pointed out that there have been people building and buying homes in the neighborhood in the last two years. Councilmember Blesener suggested tabling the matter and indicated that she would like to meet with the neighborhood. Councilmember Anderson moved that Council resolve that it be made very clear to the neighborhood that there is no City program or buyout plan for the Furlong; that the buyout of homes on a piecemeal basis be ended tonight; and that staff be directed to develop and investigate financing sources, including the MAC, Superfund, special legislation, other than Mendota Heights taxpayers, to see if there is any money available for future buyout of the neighborhood. Councilmember Blesener asked the point of cutting of the program. Councilmember Anderson explained that it appears to him that the continued piecemeal purchase is destroying the neighborhood, but that the prior purchase of two homes has not destroyed the neighborhood. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Mayor Mertensotto asked how long it would take to determine what means of financing are Page No. 2703 January 16, 1990 available to proceed with the request for buyout. Administrator Lawell responded that staff could make a preliminary investigations yet this week and that he would anticipate that it would take a month to get information on the Superfund process and formal response back from the MAC and from legislators who would be willing to support legislation. HEARING - FRIENDLY Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for HILLS TOT LOT the purpose of an informal hearing to consider the City's divestment of the Friendly Hills Tot Lot. Council acknowledged reports from Administrative Assistant Batchelder and a letter from City Attorney Sherman Winthrop dated April 19, 1983, as well as additional associated reports and minute excerpts. Park and Recreation Commission Chairperson John Huber and Park Project Manager Guy Kullander were present for the discussion. Administrative Assistant Batchelder reviewed the background on the tot lot and informed the audience of the Park and Recreation Commission's recommendation that the City commence the process for clearing title so that the lots can be sold. Mr. Huber informed the audience that the City has had a long-standing policy of not constructing tot lots. He stated that there is no funding in the referendum program to develop the Friendly Hills tot lot and that it is not recommended by the Park Commission that the Special�Park Fund support improving the tot lot. Mrs. Sylvia Nelson, 2349 Apache, submitted a drawing, prepared by the neighborhood, which presented ideas on how they would like improvements made to the lots rather than residential development. She informed Council that her decision to purchase her home was based on the open space adjacent to the property. She stated that she accepted the removal of the old play equipment as a positive measure, but that the sale of the lots for the building of 4 new homes amongst 25 year old homes would not be an improvement. She felt that the Friendly Hills park serves a different segment of the community and the play equipment is not geared to preschoolers. Page No. 2704 January 16, 1990 She urged the Council to improve the tot lot to accommodate toddlers and preschoolers, leaving space for a basketball hoop and creative play area. She informed Council that the neighborhood wants the tot lots refurbished. It was noted that the Friendly Hills Park is 300 feet from the tot lot. Mayor Mertensotto informed the audience that the Park Commission is recommending that instead of improving the tot lot, the property•should be sold and the proceeds should be used for tot equipment in the Friendly Hills Park. Mr. Huber showed the audience an exhibit on the design layout for the Friendly Hills Park, and pointed out that the proposed play equipment is the modern and the safest available. Mrs. Nelson responded that the neighborhood was led to believe that the tot lot was their park, and it is hard for the neighbors to accept something different. The audience was informed that there is only one other tot lot in the City, located in the Curley Addition, and that the reason Council agreed to the tot lot was that the area is so far from the closest park, at Rogers Lake. Mayor Mertensotto informed the audience that the Commission is looking at overall economics - maintenance is costly. He stated that had the City been incorporated at the time the Friendly Hills 1st Addition was planned, the tot lot would not have been approved. Mrs. Joan Crisp, 2341 Apache, asked why $10,000 from the referendum can't be put into purchasing equipment for the tot lot. She stated that when the referendum was proposed, the neighborhood thought that the tot lot would be the recipient of some of those funds. Laurie Lastine, 2336 Apache, stated that her parents mowed the tot lot area for many years because the City did not. She stated that it is important to the neighbors that the tot lot be retained. Lois Parsons, 2332 Apache, felt that the Friendly Hills park serves a different Page No. 2705 January 16, 1990 population than the tot lot does. Friendly Hills Park is used for organized sports, and serves people from throughout Mendota Heights and West St. Paul. She did not feel that it is a neighborhood park, and felt that it is not a safe place for tots because of the ponds. The residents of 2350 Apache and 755 Keokuk both indicated that they purchased their homes because of the proximity to two parks - Friendly Hills and the tot lot. The owner of 755 Keokuk encouraged the Council to retain the property as open space even if new play equipment is not to be installed. Mr. Huber informed the audience that the Commission intends to hold neighborhood meetings and to get neighborhood input - the drawings shown this evening were prepared to show how a contractor might place equipment. Councilmember Blesener stated that it is her understanding that the City will select a consultant to design and install play equipment for $17,500 per park. The City will then prepare a design layout plan for the parks in conjunction with other consultants and prepare presentation drawings for the neighborhood to react to. A lady in the audience stated that the neighborhood is not asking for a major change in the plans, but is asking that $5,000 worth of the equipment proposed for Friendly Hills be used instead for equipment for the tot lot. Mr. Huber responded that a flyer was distributed to everyone in the community before the referendum. It included information on everything proposed for the Friendly Hills Park, but nothing was mentioned about equipment for the tot lot. He stated that the City has no money to put into the tot lot, and the idea of selling the lots has come up since the referendum as a way to put more money into the Friendly Hills Park. If it is decided that the lots will not be sold, the money planned in the referendum for Friendly Hills Park will still be used in that park. Mayor Mertensotto suggested that no action be taken at this time but that Chairman Huber be directed to inform the Park Commission of this Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Page No. 2706 January 16, 1990 evening's discussion and see if there is an alternate recommendation. There was discussion over the level of maintenance of the lots. Councilmember Blesener moved that the matter be referred back to the Park and Recreation Commission for reconsideration of their recommendation to Council. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Staff was directed to contact Mrs. Crisp as the neighborhood's representative, keeping her informed on the matter. PLAY STRUCTURES Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from Administrative Assistant Batchelder regarding the award of a contract for the installation of play equipment in the six existing neighborhood parks and in the Victoria Highlands neighborhood park. After discussion, Councilmember Anderson moved adoption of Resolution No. 90-03, "A RESOLUTION AWARDING PLAY EQUIPMENT CONTRACT FOR NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS," awarding the contract for installation of seven play structures to Earl F. Anderson Associates at a price of $17,500 per installation. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 89-25, FRYE Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on an application from Mr. & Mrs. Richard Frye for a critical area variance to allow construction of a two- story indoor pool at 1845 Hunter Lane. Council acknowledged a letter from Mr. & Mrs. Frye requesting that the hearing be continued to February 6th to allow them to develop new plans and review their options. It was the consensus that if new plans are submitted, they should be reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to Council consideration. Councilmember Blesener moved to continue the hearing to 7:45 o'clock P.M. on February 6th and to direct staff to notify the applicants that if they are planning to show Council new Page No. 2707 January 16, 1990 plans, they should appear before the Planning Commission first. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 89-25, At the request of the applicant, Council- DODGE NATURE CENTER member Blesener moved that the hearing on Dodge Nature Center's application for conditional use permit for planned unit development be continued to February 6th. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 NIGHT WATCH LIGHTS Council acknowledged a report from Public Works Director Danielson with regard to an NSP night watch light which had been installed and subsequently removed from the Don Baier property at 741 Mohican Court after a complaint had been received. Council also acknowledged a letter from Mr. & Mrs. Baier and a petition from several Mohican Court residents supporting the installation of the light. Mayor Mertensotto stated that he is concerned that homeowners can just make a request for a light to NSP and NSP will install it. He felt that all requests for security lights should be processed through the City and that NSP should refer the requests to the City. Mr. Bob Schmall, from NSP, stated that NSP will be willing to work with the City. He informed Council that NSP believes it has the right to provide this service, but feels that everyone should be treated in a fair manner. He stated that the whole problem hinges on the language in the City's ordinance. Mr. Bernard Friel informed Council that he is the person who complained about the light. He stated that residents in the immediate area talked about street lighting in the neighborhood about 8 years ago and the consensus was that there should be none. It was concluded, he stated, that the neighborhood would undertake the neighborhood crime watch program and consideration of street lighting was dismissed. He felt that the subject light is significantly brighter than any street light in the City. His home is 300 feet away from the light, yet on the Page No. 2708 January 16, 1990 evening the light was installed, he could see his shadow in his bedroom with the room lights off. He stated that he feels the City ordinance (No. 401) was designed for lights like this, glaring lights which constitute a nuisance, to prevent the light source from being visible from adjoining property. He also observed that the light was erected on the wrong side of the pole. Councilmember Anderson stated that he interprets the ordinance section as meaning that if someone heard a noise at night and turned on their floodlights and the source could be seen by a neighbor, that neighbor has the right to call the Police, who could charge the property owner with a nuisance. He felt that the ordinance language needs much change, and needs to be defined, and that Council should determine whether the ordinance language is needed. Mr. Friel responded that Councilmember Anderson may be correct as the strict interpretation, but this light is on all night. Councilmember Blesener also felt that the ordinance needs work. She stated that she is not in favor of street lights, but feels people in'individual neighborhoods should have. some option of approaching the City - and if the majority desire to have their neighborhood lit they should have the opportunity to do so. She informed Mr. Friel that Council has been trying to develop a street lighting policy for years. She felt that the subject light is a street light rather than a night watch light, and that she believes the intent of a night watch light is not to illuminate the neighborhood but rather to illuminate the private property. She asked Mr. Schmall whether there is a night watch light that can be downlit and whether there are any alternatives available. Mr. Schmall responded that the subject light has a 100 watt lamp with high pressure sodium. He stated that the light source is probably equivalent to the surface brightness of the moon or a bright star. He informed Council that Mr. Friel probably is seeing the light because of the refractor. The light is intended to give light out to 100 feet at Page No. 2709 January 16, 1990 about the brightness of moonlight. He observed that the brilliance of the source drops after about 100 hours, and the lamp and reflector will get dirty, and as the lamp ages the light will diminish in brightness. Responding to a Council question, Mr. Schmall explained why the mounting height of this type of light is 25 feet. He stated that NSP can put the light on the other side of the pole and can paint the lens so as not to allow light to emit towards the Friel house. Councilmember Anderson asked if Council revises the ordinance to initiate a different procedure, could people instead install their own light on their own pole and save money? He also asked whether NSP has received complaints from any other residents in the Baier neighborhood. Mr. Schmall responded that there would be a cost savings, in terms of installation labor, however he felt that statistics would prove that NSP can rent this type of light to people cheaper than they can buy and maintain their own lights. He informed Council that he has received no complaints other than that of Mr. Friel. Also responding to a question from Councilmember Anderson, he stated that there is a similar light on Pagel Road. Councilmember Anderson asked if NSP would be concerned that people would be more likely to install gerry-rigged lights if Council changes the procedure. Mr. Schmall stated that he would be concerned, and it is very likely that people would install their own lights. He felt that the City would then experience more problems - people will install their lights too low. Most of the time, the subject light is not a problem for people in the area because of its 45 degree viewing area - in this case the problem is caused because of the terrain. Mrs. Alice Baier, 741 Mohican Court, stated that her husband is in law enforcement, working nights, and comes home at 3:00 A.M. She informed Council that when they asked NSP for the light, they had no desire to do anything underhanded. They felt that the additional light was necessary because of Mr. Page No. 2710 January 16, 1990 Baier's work shift, and so that he could safely walk the dog between the house and kennel after work, etc. They had no desire to install a street light, nor was one installed. She stated that they contacted NSP to install the lowest wattage night watch light. She informed Council that she had checked with the City and NSP and indicated that she and her husband were more than willing to come to some compromise with the complainant but that he would not accept any compromise. Her position was that if the City directs NSP to turn the light out, the decision would be arbitrary if all similar lights in the City are not also taken out. She agreed that perhaps the ordinance should be reworked to avoid future problems but that her light would not be affected. One of the compromises discussed with NSP was to put a reflector on the light and paint the side facing the Friel home black, which would place the light only towards her house. It was noted that NSP has installed similar lights for 37 residential and 14 commercial customers and that this is the only complaint the City has received. One of the Baiers' neighbors stated that eleven of the neighbors are present and have signed and submitted a letter supporting the Baiers. He stated that the neighbors see the light and it does not bother them, whereas the lighting at the top of the hill (Friel residence) appears to be like Star Wars yet none of the neighbors have complained about it. He felt that if the Friels can have security lights, the Baiers should have the same right. Another neighbor stated that he lives across the street from the Baier residence and the light doesn't bother him even though it shines directly into his home. He stated that Mr. Friel lives 350 to 400 feet away from the light, and suggested that it couldn't bother him very much. Mr. Friel responded that he did not get in touch with the Baiers and perhaps should have. When he placed the complaint with NSP initially, they said they install the lights � whenever they are requested and did not know there was any objection - if there was one Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Page No. 2711 January 16, 1990 they would turn the light off. He then researched City ordinances and informed the Mayor that he felt the issue should be addressed so that lights do not start showing up all over town. He stated that he objects to the light. He informed Council that he does have lighting on his home and uses it occasionally in the evening. He has lights that turn on and off automatically when the garage is approached. He felt that the light is much brighter than any other intersection street light and casts an orange glow at far greater distance than 100 feet. Mr. Jack Shoho, NSP counsel, stated that it is extraordinarily difficult for NSP to deal with an ordinance that has so little standard. Mr. Friel's is not an adjacent residential property, and under a reading of the ordinance, he is complaining as any other member of the public can complain about any other light in the community. While NSP is interested in cooperating with the community, there must be greater definition of the standards. He stated that NSP has had no such difficulty in Minneapolis, St. Paul, or other surrounding communities, and felt that the source of the problem may be Section 17.14 of the zoning ordinance. He stated that NSP would be happy to make some suggestions in redrafting the ordinance language. Councilmember Blesener pointed out that there has been plenty of precedent elsewhere in the City for the night watch light. She felt that a compromise should be worked out to reduce the light impact on the Friel property, and that staff should be directed to review the lighting ordinance. Councilmember Anderson moved to: direct staff to redraft Section 17.14 of the zoning ordinance, using whatever resources are available and with input from NSP; authorize NSP to turn the light back on; direct that NSP paint around the perimeter of the light and maintain the paint; and to direct NSP to turn the light inward onto the Baier property if at all feasible. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Councilmember Anderson clarified that it is the intent of the motion that the light not be Page No. 2712 January 16, 1990 powered until the painting and turning of the light occur. DEER SURVEY Council acknowledged a memo from Administrator Lawell along with a letter from the Minnesota DNR requesting funding for a helicopter survey of the deer population within the Fort Snelling State Park adjacent to Mendota Heights. It was estimated that the City's cost would not exceed $200.00 and could be funded through the administration sundry budget allocation. Councilmember Hartmann moved to authorize City financial participation in a DNR helicopter survey of the deer population within the Fort Snelling State Park area adjacent to Mendota Heights. ' Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 ASSESSMENT Council acknowledged a memo from the City CANCELLATION . Clerk recommending that the street lighting improvement assessment levied against a portion of Mn/DOT right-of-way for T.H. 55 (Improvement NO. 86-11) be cancelled Councilmember Hartmann moved to authorize the cancellation of the balance of the assessment levied against Parcel No. 27-03400-011-75 for Improvement No. 86-11. Councilmember Anderson seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 LEGISLATIVE POLICIES Council acknowledged the proposed Dakota County legislative policies for 1990 along with an associated memo from the City Administrator. BOARD OF REVIEW Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from the City Clerk regarding the scheduling of the 1990 Board of Review. It was noted that the date proposed by the County Assessor, April 10th, is Passover, and that the only available alternate date is Wednesday, May 2nd. After discussion, Councilmember Blesener moved to schedule the 1990 Board of Review for � � Page No. 2713 January 16, 1990 7:30 o'clock P.M. on Wednesday, May 2nd. Councilmember Anderson seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmember Anderson moved that the meeting be adjourned. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:32 o'clock P.M. ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY �, 1990 Blacktop Licenses Asphalt Specialties Co., Inc. Pine Bend Paving, Inc. General Contractors Licenses A & L Construction A-Men Construction & Consulting Co. Charles Cudd Corp. Dakota Fire Suppression D.J. Kranz Company, Inc. D.S. Trudeau Co. Garvey Construction Heaver Design & Construction, Inc. Industrial Sprinkler Corp. of MN, Inc. K.W. Dahm Construction Co., Inc. Kraus-Anderson Const. Co. Linert Construction Rossbach Construction, Inc. Sawyer's Construction Shield Fire Protection, Inc. Twin City Fireplace Company Twin City Storm Sash Unipro Construction Corp. Valley Investments Construction � Masonrv Licenses Carlson Masonry, Inc. Fred A. Deutsch Gresser, Inc. M.F. Fleischhacker, Inc. SeMent Construction, Inc. Excavatina Licenses A. Kamish & Sons, Inc. Becklin Brothers Growth Sewer & .Y�ater Mack's Excavating Plymouth Plumbing, Inc. Rauchwarter, Inc. Rayco Excavating Rose Sewer & Water Rumpca Sewer & Water, Inc. S.J. Dahn Trucking & Excavating, Inc. Gas Pipinq Licenses American Burner Service, Inc. Apollo Heating & Vent. Corp. Arneson Heating Service Co. Blaine Heating, A/C & Electric, Inc. Cedar Valley Heating & A/C • 4 Gas Pii�in., g Li.censes Continued Effica.ent Air Control Egan & Sons Cc�mpany Merit HVAC, Inc. Ray N. Welter Heating Co. Rouse Mechanicai, Inc. Heatina & Air Conditionir�q Licenses Airstream Heating & Cooling American Burner Service, Inc. Apollo Heating & Vent. Corp. Benke Heating B1.aine Heating, A/C & Electric, Inc. Boehm Heating Company � Cedar Valley Heating & A/C Egan & Sons Co. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc. Merit HVAC, Inc. Midwestern Mechanical Corp. Ray N. Welter Heating Co. Rause Mechani,cal, Inc. P1.aster Licenses Housley Construction, Inc. Quality Drywall, Inc. Tree Remaval License S& S Tree Specialists, Inc. :y CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, JANUARY 23, 1990 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesda�, January 23, 1990, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve. Chairman Morson called the meeting to order at 7:32 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Morson, Koll, Dwyer, Dreelan, Duggan and Tilsen.. Commissioner Krebsbach was excused. Also present were Public Works Director Danielson and Planning Consultant Howard Dahlgren. APPROVAL oF Commissioner Duggan moved approval of the MINUTES December 26, 1989 minutes. Commissioner Koll seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 CASE NO. 90-01 Mr. Bruce Posthumus, 540 West Annapolis POSTHUMUS - Street, presented his request for a front yard VARIANCE setback variance. He stated that he would like to u�grade his existing house by constructing a second story addition. He submitted pictures of the existing structure for the Commission to review. In response to a question from Chairman Morson, Mr. Posthumus explained that he had obtained signatures of consent from all his contiguous neighbors. He further explained the reason why he did not obtain signatures of consent from the neighbors to the east. Mr. Posthumus stated that he had obtained a CUP to construct a garage last �ear and he had initially gotten permission from his neighbors to the east. He stated that they ran into problems and they withdrew their consent when he started construction. He stated that he had to go back and modify the plans. He stated that rather than obtaining the consent himself, given the situation, he felt that the City should contact them. He further stated that it was his understanding with Howard Dahlgren, Paul Berg and the City Administrator that they were going to contact his neighbors. Public Works Director Jim Danielson stated that he has not contacted the people and that he was unsure if Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant, did or not. Chairman Morson commented that this matter is not a public hearing. In response to a question from Commissioner Dwyer, Mr. Posthumus stated that he has no knowledge of whether the neighbors know about his proposed addition. He stated that it is possible that they have heard about the addition from his other neighbors. January 23, 1990 Page 2 Chairman Morson stated that the addition will be on the west side of Mr. Posthumus' property and that it would not really be significant to his neighbors on the east. Mr. Posthumus agreed. Mr. Posthumus stated that they might see a change in the roof line. He stated that the second story addition would only be visible to them from the street. Commissioner Tilsen asked if the peak of the existing house will be extended or will it have a different pitch. Mr. Posthumus stated that over the center portion of the house the roof will be reconstructed along with the existing roof line except over the front part of the house. Mr. Posthumus stated that the gable roof (viewed from the front of the home) will remain. Commissioner Tilsen stated that the Commission should be clear in their intention that the addition is to be used as living space and not a garage. In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Mr. Posthumus reiterated that he was not trying to keep his addition a secret from his neighbors to the east. He stated that it would be best that he not contact them based on what happened when he applied for the CUP last year. Commissioner Koll asked if there are any water problems. She stated that the garage is close to the street and she wondered about the snow plows in the winter time. Mr. Posthumus stated that the water problem was rectified with the construction of the new garage. Commissioner Koll asked if there was a concern with the living quarters being so close to the street. Mr. Posthumus answered that the street is one block long and that there is minimal traffic. Commissioner Koll questioned if the house, in the future, would ever be connected to the garage. Mr. Posthumus said no and that it would be virtually impossible. Commissioner Dwyer asked if he was going to raze the existing garage and Mr. Posthumus answered no. He stated that they will build on top of the existing structure. Commissioner Dwyer moved to recommend to the City Council that they approve a 28.1 foot front yard setback variance conditioned upon proof of notice of the easterly neighbors so that they can appear at the time of the City Council meeting, if they wish, and that the structure be built and used for residential purposes. Commissioner Tilsen seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 .' Chairman Morson Jim Danielson to neighbors to the January 23, 1990 Page 3 directed Public Works Director inform Mr. Posthumus' east. CASE NO. 89-34 Chairman Morson opened the meeting at 7:58 MENDOTA HTS o'clock P.M. for the purpose of a public ANIMAL HOSPI- hearing to discuss a request from Dr. Tom TAL (HEARING) Koepke of the Mendota Heights Animal Hospital for a CUP for an animal hospital expansion. Dr. Tom Koepke, Mendota Heights Animal Hospital, was present to discuss his rec�uest for a CUP to construct an addition to his clinic. Dr. Koepke introduced to the Commission Mr. Langer, Langer Construction Company, who was present to answer any technical questions. Public Works Director Jim Danielson confirmed that hearing notices had been sent to the neighbors of the Animal Hospital. Dr. Koepke stated that he had made an effort over the last two months to let everybody know what he is doing. Dr. Koepke stated that he understands the concern expressed in the planning reports about parking. He stated that the nature of his business just doesn't cause a problem with parking. He stated that at this time, the grooming facility and the hospital all enter off of Dodd Road. He explained that the groominc� facility will be moved over to the other side and that should cut in half the parking. He stated that they would be better off with that move. In response to a question from Commissioner Dreelan, Dr. Koepke stated that the new entrance off of Freeway Road will be strictly used for the grooming facility. He stated that the parking lot on that side will be strictly for the grooming clients except for the mobile veterinary van - if in fact they ever get that unit. Dr. Koepke further stated that the other people who would come for surgeries or boarding would all use the Dodd Road exit. He stated that the animal hospital would not use the Freeway Road entrance. Commissioner Dreelan stated the she feels that the design of the new building looks like an army barracks. She stated that she would like to see the roof line brought down so that the addition would not look so square and that she had some concern on how the windows are situated. Dr. Koepke stated that he thought the windows on the brick broke up the building. He further commented that the existing building is square and that is the cheapest way to build and that you get the most utilization of space using that design. Dr. Koepke stated that he hopes the trees January 23, 1990 Page 4 right in front of the building will help break up that look. Dr. Koepke stated that he has contacted a landscaper with regards to planting Blue S�ruce trees. He stated that he hopes that will help break up the look of the addition. Commissioner Dwyer asked Dr. Koepke if he has received any comments from the neighbors. Dr. Koepke responded that he has not. Commissioner Duggan asked if it would be possible to consider bringing the windows together on the top story so that there are larger windows. He stated that would be more appropriate in design of the neighborhood. Commissioner Tilsen stated that what they would like to see is a more residential look to the building. Dr. Koepke stated that they could make windows larger and do the windows every other one instead of having no windows. He stated that he has no problem with cutting out one half of the windows - it is feasible." Commissioner Duggan noticed a requirement in the ordinance requiring precast roof. Dr. Koepke stated that in his existing building he doesn't have a precast roof. Commissioner Du�gan questioned if there have been any complaints about noise. Dr. Koepke stated that on the existin� building they have insulated every single inside wall. .He stated that has worked out great. Dr. Koepke stated that he knows that is the ordinance but that he didn't do that on the original building. Planner Dahlgren stated that a precast roof is for noise abatement and that a wood roof could be designed to abate the sound as well as a precast concrete roof. Public Works Director stated that the Commission should waive the requirement of a precast roof as the existing building does not have a precast roof. Commissioner Duggan asked if this was just something that slipped through the cracks when the initial building was built. Dr. Koepke answered yes. In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Mr. Langer responded that estimated time of construction would be about four months. He further commented on the noise factor that the sound transfer range for that composite roof would be very close or equivalent to a precast roof. In response to a question raised by the Commission, Planner Dahlgren stated that the total parking spaces is eighteen plus two AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 January 23, 1990 Page 5, 1990 double garages which is four more totalling twenty-two. He commented that they didn't know the exact square footage of the new building in terms of the floor area. Dr. Koepke responded that what he has total in the animal hospital right now is 5,860 square feet including the addition. Planner Dahlgren stated that�the total parking on the site would seem to total twenty-two spaces. There was a brief discussion on the total square footage of the building. Dr. Koepke stated that if the clinic were sold, it would be tough to convert the building into office space due to the uniqueness in the building's design. He stated that it would be highly unlikely that it would ever be used for anything else. Commissioner Tilsen had some concern with the driveway entrance off of Freeway Road. Dr. Koepke stated that they moved the entrance as far back as they could. Commissioner Tilsen questioned whether the entrance could be moved east to ten feet from the property line. He stated that there might be better movement of the cars within the parking lot. Mr. Langer commented that if they do what Commissioner Tilsen is suggesting, it would make a relatively steep slope down into the parking lot. Mr. Langer stated that at the time of the final grading, they will try and move the entrance as far east as possible and still have a reasonable slope so it is not slippery. Commissioner Tilsen stated that he is concerned with cars backing out and cars entering all at the same time. Mr. Langer commented that they are always very sensitive to the north side of the building because of ice. In response to a question from Commissioner Dwyer, Dr. Koepke stated that there are about 12 to 15 cars per day. He stated that the traffic is sporadic. Chairman Morson noted that there was no one present in the audience for the public hearing. Commissioner Dwyer moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. Commissioner Tilsen moved to recommend to the City Council that they approve a CUP to allow the animal hospital to expand according to the January 23, 1990 Page 6 plans submitted subject to the building design look residential in character and look at moving the driveway 10 feet east of the propert� line. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. Commissioner Koll questioned the drainage proposal. Dr. Koepke responded that he will do whatever the City wants. There was a brief discussion on the parking lot and entrance off of Freeway Road. Planner Dahlgren stated that he is concerned about the motive for moving the driveway further east because it will do two negative things. He stated that the further east you move it the steeper the driveway gets. He further stated that if you move the driveway further east you will lose a parking space or make it very difficult to get to the westerly most spot. He stated that the distance from the driveway to Dodd Road is adequate for the amount of traffic that is entering and leaving this facility. Commissioner Dreelan withdrew her second to the motion and offered a friendly amendment stating that the driveway be moved easterly as far as possible and to waive the ordinance requirement for a precast roof. Commissioner Dwyer seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 RESCHEDULING Due to February 27, 1990 being �recinct OF FEBRUARY caucus night, the Planning Commission meeting 1990 MEETING scheduled for that night must be changed as the two meetings cannot coincide. It was the concensus of the Commission to reschedule the February meeting to Wednesday, February 28, 1990 at 7:30 o'clock P.M. CASE NO. 89-34 Commissioner Duggan moved to continue the MIST - AMEND. public hearing to February 28, 1990 at 8:00 TO ZONING ORD. o'clock P.M. & CUP Commissioner Dwyer seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 KENSINGTON There was a lengthy discussion regarding the PUD DIS- status and future schedule for Kensington PUD. CUSSION A letter from Mr. Richard Putnam of the Tandem Corporation was submitted to the Commission previous to tonight's meeting for their review. The letter submitted was a suggested tentative schedule for review of the Kensington PUD by City Council, Planning Commission and the Parks and Recreation Commission. It was the concensus of the Commission that any member could attend the tour and informal discussion of Kensington and January 23, 1990 Page 7 Park project on Saturday, February 3rd front 8:OQ A.M. to 10:00 A.M. It wa� noted that all. Commissioners, Council and interested citizens are welcame. There was a brie� discussion regarding a tentative work session scheduled during a regularly scheduled Parks and Recreation Commission meetinc� �or Tuesday, February 13th that the Planning Commission ha� been invited to at�end to discuss the Kensington and Fark Project. VERBAL REVIEW Public Work� Director Jim Danielsan gave a verbal review to the Planning Commissian an City� Couneil action on Planning items. MENDQTA HTS Dr. Koepke interjected that he was attempting ANIMAL HOSP. to purchase more land from Brian Birch but the Mr. Birch was unwilling to see more land to him at this time. Dr, Koepke tald tha Commission that he would cantinue in his effarts and that this extra lancl, when abtained, could be made available for parking spaces. ADJOURN Commissioner Koll moved to adjaurn to February � 13, 1990 joint work session with the Parks and Recreation Commi.ssion at 7:dd P.M. It was also noted that Planner Dahlgren and Chairman Morson wauld not be attending the work ses�ion. , Gommissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 ABSTAIN: 1, MorsOri TIME OF ADJQUF:NMENT 9:35 o'ciock P.M. Respectfully submitted, Kimberlee K. Blaeser Senior 5ecretary 0 MEMO Date: 1-23-90 T0: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Building Activity Report for January 1990 CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE 90 YEAR TO DATE 89 BUILDING � � PERMITS: No. Valuation Fee Collected � No. Valuation Fee Collected � No. Valuation Fee Collected � . � SfD 4 704,282.00 5,976.30 � � 4 615,604.00 5,473.89 APT 0 0 0 � � 0 0 0 TOWNHOUSE 0 0 0 � � 5 821,235.00 7,041 21 CONDO 0 0 0 � � 7 1,500,000.00 7,490.18 MISC. 8 54,145.00 1,000.50 � � 5 53,708.00 1,134.90 C/I 5 60,935.00 1,063.43 � � 3 10,600.00 297.00 -------------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Sub Total 17 819,362.00 8,040.23 � � 24 3,001,147.00 21,437.18 � � � � ' TRADE � � PERMITS• � I � � Plumbing 3 79.00 � � 11 246.00 Water 7 5.00 � � 8 40.00 Sewer 5 87.50 � � 5 87.50 Heat, AC, � � & Gas 8 458.00 � � 12 811.00 -------------------------------------------+------------------------------------+----------------------------- Sub Total 77 629.50 � � 36 1,184.50 � � � � Licensina• � � � � Contractor's � I Licenses 197 4,925.00 � . � 222 5,550.00 -------------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Total 231 819,362.00 13,594.73 � � 282 3,001,147.00 28,171.68 NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac, and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee, and valuation amounts. 4• . ` • i . 1'F• k 2 . $ , .� n • L F µ f t , t r •+ Y , ' • t • � i � '' ' � . � � . + t .4 * f r f »' � �. • n �_. _ �� -.,�M�� 1��ierit�o�a. H+�ights .�.,�,,� Pollcc� Dep�rtnr��nt 12 January,1990 • Honorable Chazles Mertensotto, Mayor Mr. M. Thomas Lawell, City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victaria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota SSI1$ Gentlemen, Attached, you will find the 1989 annual report for the Mendota Heights Police Department. It is presented to yau in an effart ta iltusirate the activities, functions and accomplishments of the past year. In spite of ttie drasdc changes t��g place alt aronnd us, we have managed to keeg increases in criminat activity at a very accept�tble level. The major difference in the past several years is not the amounts of crime and criminals, bnt ct�e number of arrests and solutians ws have managed. In the grocess, we have learned that it is much more time and cost cansuming to solve crimes than it is to merely report them. Our Department has also learned that it is rnuch more rewarding. Major changes that you will note are: 0 A 14 % increase in Qie number of felany arccsts (3 A S3 % inerease in the number of mis@emeanor arrests 0 A 48 % increase in the number of gross misdemeanor and warrant arrests fl No increase in the Tota2 af Part I- V{�ffenses Even thongh the enforcement action of the Degartment has sharply increased, the number of compiaints against it was negligible and the number of substantiated complainls was zero. The success of thc Department can be attributed ta the focus and deciication of the Palrol OfLicers, the exlra haurs and extra work of the Patroi Sergeants, the dillegence and tharoughness of ihe Investigatars and the condnucci support of the City Council. The rnen and wornen who represent the Department have done an admirable job and I am pleased tg submit this rcpt�rt af thcir accomplishments. ��; �e� ,�� Dennis 7 De mont, Chief Mendata Heights Police I7epaztrnent 1101 Victoria Curve •Niei�do�a Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452•1366 Table of �ontents � ADM�NIS"�'RATION ................................................. 1 , • Table of 4rganization * Personell • • Training • Finances S� IA . FLTN TION ............................................ 4 • D.A,R.E. • Intern Prograzn • Part Time Officer • E.M.T.F. • Emergency Preparedness PATROL,.PIV�SION .................................................. G • Activity Clock • Synogsis • Activity Report • Vehicle Report INVESTIGATIVE UIVISION .........................»......., 10 • Major Cases • • Equipment STATISTiCS .............................................................. 12 • Accident Data • PartsI&II • Parts IB through V Tab�e of organ�Zat�on � ADMINISTRATIO� Sergeant Investigator Investigator 0 Patxoi Officer Patrol Officer Patxol Officer City Administrator Chief of Police Patrol Sergeant -1- Patxol Officer Patrol Officer Patrol Officer Secretary Clerk- Typist Police Intern Patrol Sergeant Patroi Officer Patrol Officer Patroi Officer ADMINISTRA�IOIO� • • ��► _ The Mendota Heights Police Department op- erated with a staff of sixteen for tlie majority of 1989. These included a Chief, an Investigative Sergeant, two Patrol Sergeants, an Investigator, 9 Patrol Ofiicers, a secretary and a clerk. On April 1, 1989 there were two significant changes. Officer Laurence Bridger was assigned as an In- vestigator to assist Sergeant Wicks with a grow- ing case load and David Olson was hired as a Pa- trol Officer to fill the resulting vacancy. The selecrion of Officer Olson was accom- plished "in-house" with members of the Patrol Division serving an important role in the pro- cess. This method was used previously by the Department and has served us well. It gives us an opportunity to determine an applicants fitness for service not only as a police Officer, but as a Mendota Pro-File Hei�hts Police Carol Bakka, Secretary. Carol start- OffiCer. The ed her career wilh the DeparUnent in memberS of � 1975. She left for thrce ycars to ac- the Patrol Di- company her husband, a chemist for vision must Ecolab, to Belgium. Carol is a resi- train, and then dent of Eagan and also worked 10 work along- years for Ecolab. She has served as side the new secretary to three different Mendota member. It is Heights Police Chiefs. Carol and , appropriate Dick spend their liesure time traveling that their opin- or boa[ing on the Mississippi. iOn of th0 Can- didate is heav- . ily weighted in the final decision. After reporting for duty, a new Officer takes part in an extensive field training program where they are continually familiarized, trained and evaluated by their training offcer(s). New Offi- cers, as well as newly promoted or assigned Offi- cers, are required to serve a one year probation. TRAINING Very few professions are impacted by change as much as that of the law enforcement officer. We are in the midst of staggering changes in the laws we enforce, the methods we are allowed to use to complete our mission, the technology that surrounds us, the ways we communicate and the ways we pro- cess and use information. We are pres- ently in the in- fancy of an age of enor- mous and rap- id upheaval. If we stay the same, if we merely try to keep pace - we lose. One of our most effective Pro-File Dennis Delmont, Police Chief. Dennis came to the Department, as Chicf, in 1982. He formerly headed the palrol Division of the Maplewood Police Department where he served for 16 years. A 23 year veteran, he has studied law enforcement a� Norlh- west University, The U of M, Lal:e- wood Communi�y Collcge and The FBI National Academy. He is a for- mer president of the Dal:ota County Chiefs Association and serves on, or chairs, seven commiltees from differ- ent Police and Emergency Manage- mcnt Associations. �vvi� iii u�.ui- ■ ing with this change is training and education. The State of Minnesota requires us to provide a certain mini- ma� amount of training for our people, but we go further in an attempt to improve ourselves. Po- lice Officers must be capable in many areas and our training is designed to reflect that need. ' In 1989 each of our officers received an aver- age of 54 hours of specialized training. This training ran the gamut from firearms to comput- ers to forensics. Law updates, satanism and the occult, emergency medical training and hazard- ous materials were also among the 751 total hours. This training was supplemented by the purchase of books, magazines, periodicals and videos. All of this was accomplished with train- ing and subscription budgets that totaled $6,900. We are entering the 1990's at breakneck speed and it is obvious that we have to continue to provide our people with the proper mental and physical tools to meet the challenges that lie ahead. -2- Pro-�'ile Rebecca Pentel, Clerk- Receptionist. "Becky" has lived in Mendota Heights since age 3, and she, and new husband Randy, have just built a new house in the City. She came to the Police De- partment part-time in 1986 and went full-time in January of`1987. Besides her clerical dulies, Becky meets and �reels the many visitors at the front desk of the Police De- partmen� . v � � � � .� � � ' ��ADI��IINISTRAT�ON EXPENDITiJRES: � � � � u . Training and misc. 1 R , . Suppiies and repair 4.5� - - Equipment 5.1 R " Contractuai sezvices 1,3� � _ ' � Personai services - 76.3R - � . . � .� . � . . " ��:� ��:��r ��r,��+��.,�� f ; .. _. ._....._ __..... � _ ._ � 7; .�+"� �:� � ��Y�� I:� +��: I� -�� •< •,,1' . ,i : •�::�'. i ��" �, \ : ��,: • .� i ,.,'.;:'.. �-�, .�:.•:::;::: .i �:�• �;�,;�:';�,-,,,�'°' . `'!�'s, :� �.��,�� :_ �� i1�r.��w�.!4 �',1�.� .. . _ . . _ .. . _ _ _ ..... . .. . _ .,., ?�r. / :;r:; � �1.oq �`" ,'i�:4i't : � �t. � �s � -',• : ` •.. �-� • ♦ � ��i ..�7 d �. \,� �'J: � :�: L•`r : ,- _.;: � � � � .J :.. ''! +.� :. . : .� RE`YENUES: ' � - . Tax Levy 7 9.3 R � . " • • Lilydaie Contract 8� � � � , . � .. . Police State Aid 6.3R . , . e , Mendota Contract 4� - Fines and Misc. 2.4� °-' _-- r - - -3- �PECIAL PR4GR�IVIS JJ�A��■�s The Drug Abuse Resistance Education Program is an exciting new cooperative venture between the Mendota Heights and West St. Paul Police Departments and Independent School District 197. It involves 17, one hour blocks of instruc- tion delivered to local fifth graders by a uni- formed (but un-armed) police officer. Although it is geared toward drug abuse prevention, the Mario was a part-lime Mendota Heights Police Officer for a year be- fore he was hired full-time in 1981. He is a graduate of Inver Hills Com- munily College and serves as the De- paztments DARE Officer as well as working the street. A former "Heights" resident., he now lives in West St. Paul. program in- cludes excel- lent segments that are de- signed to en- hance the self- esteem and confidence lev- el of the younb sters as well. The actual pro- gram will start in January, 1990, but the groundwork was all done in 1989. The Chief of Police met with School District officials and members of the City Council and received their preliminary support. Meetings followed that in- cluded the Chief and teachers, Parent Teachers Organization members, business and fraternal groups and other law enforcement officials that were involved in similar programs. Officer Ma- rio Reyes was selected to initiate the program and he was sent to Springfield, Illinois where he went through an intensive DARE Instructor Training course. He has since worked with the teachers and administrators from our elementary schools to prepare for the actual presentation of the program. D.A.R.E. is funded primarily through donations of time, material and money. The City of Men- dota Heights, ISD 197, and Visitation Elemen- tary School have contributed funding as well. In January of 1989, close to 200 young people will begin to learn some practical lessons that will serve them throu�hout their lives. They will learn how to say no for the right reasons. INTFRN PRnGRAM The Police Department cooperates with several Minnesota Colleges in providing internships to students who are seeking degrees in the field of Law Enforcement. Onr nrosram allows for three � interns a year, each serving an , amount of time equal to a college quarter. During their internship, students learn more about police work than they normally would in a classroom setting. It allows them to develop a feel for the career and gives them some first hand experience with our officers. While they are here they are required to complete a specific project that is beneficial to the Department and the community. The numbers of things that they can actually do while they are with us are strictly regulated by Statute. Some of the past intern projects have in- cluded updating data-bases, identifying viola- tions of our bnilding and zoning ordinances, working to get proper house numbers applied and bringing Department directories up to date. PART TTMT+� nrFICrR Of the four part-time Officers with the De- partment in 1982, one is still active. Because of time demands, training costs, potential liability and licensing requirements, the Department has no plans to add to the program. Our lone "part-timer", Gerold Murphy has been active with the program since 1977 and has proven a tremendous asset. He is only called upon when he is needed, and that is usually at a moments notice. His notable activities in 1989 include his many hours of work in connection with the Sibley High School iiicident and the sur- veillance of two stolen vehicles in White Bear Lake that culminated in the arrest of two sus- pects. In addition to showing up when needed, "Jerry" donates many hours meeting the training requirements necessary to maintain his license. Jerry is the manager of Somerset Country Club in Mendota .I�eights. -4-' ' � �`iKfi. ��'.'�. .:r� a.�' �'° • : ;N.�,�"y'r�h'`'nr�,"�r}�ix`•'.'»<�L � S�r-'r , ir �r . a .j`,y 0 ; A� T. � ' r'� � � � �,• 2 4 � N � : � "L a � r .- t� 1 . S .1. _ t.. ' , .� ' � ~ . . - SPE+�IAL� PRCI�RA.11�S East _Metra Drug Task Farce The East Metro Drug Task Force has been suc- cessful in addressirtg the enforcement aspect of our county-wide substance abuse problem. Made up of officers from several Police Depart- ments in the Eastern and Narthern pordons of the County, the Task Farce operates under the direction of the Da%ota County Sheriffs Depart- ament Narcotics Division: It has answered two problems faced by Dakata Caunty municipali- ties; the lack of sufficient numbers of trained narcotics officers, and the atiility to assemble enaugh manpower, on short natice, to carry out an effective invesrigation or operadon. Each n3ember of the team spends approximately 24 }ioors a manth with the �EMTF. The Mendota Heights iepresentative is Of�icer Jeff Piotrasch- ke. � � ' � Since its inceptian in April, 1989, the Task Force has been responsible for'42 arrests and the sei- zure of 82,'7 lbs. of mtu•ijuana, 9.8 ibs. of co- cline, 64 grams of inetampl�etamine, � oz. af psilocy6in musl�rooms, .10 �-ams of Cocaine base (crack), 64 units o£ Valium and 97 "hits" of LSD. Assets siezed include an assortment af firearms, 8 vehicles and $55,526. in cash. This does not include the siezure of 3001bs. of mari- jUana, $207,Q00. in cash and 11 vehicIes siezed in a joint operatian with the BCA. . Not only can the Task Force, as an organizatian, cali tagether a mimber of offieers in a moments notice, but it has also provided an excellent envi- ronment for officers to learn, "hands-an", the many varied aspects o£ narcorics investigatian. �roiFiJg ' . . Je1�1' P�otraschke, Patrol Officer JeCf had alxeady bcen a Spring Lake Park Poiice Offi- cer for 4 years when we "stole" him in May of 1986. He is a graduate oCLakewaod C. C. artd a resident of So. St. Paul. His fn�her Ken was a M.H. pnrt-time of- �icer for many years. JeLf a]so serves as aur represen- tative on the East Metro Task Farce. �-� , Floyd Arndt, Patrol Ofi►cer Our most senior of�cer, Floyd has been wilh tha Mcndata Heights Police Depart- ment far 27 years, and has lived in Mendota Heights all of his life. Currently a member of the U.S Army Resrve, he scrved as a Military Paliceman while he was on active duty. , Roger Plath, Patrol Of�cer: Rogcr was appaintcd to the Depariment in January,196b. Truly a"jack-of-all-trades", Roger has becn a private pilot, bodybuilder, rnember of the I7akota County MAA.G {SWAT} Team, Littte League coach; machinist, outdoorsman, PoIice Reserve and ski in- slructor among olher thin�s. EMERGENCY PREPAREDN�SS The Police Chief has served as Directo'r of Emer= gency Preparedness sznce 1982. His activi:ty in 1989 was both extensive and rewarding and in-� � cluded the foilowing: Completed a comprehensive . overhaul of the City's Emergen- cy Plan to comply with SARA Tit1e III. Revised and dis[ribut- ed the Mendota Heigl�ts 1Vlutual Aid Respanse Guide. Served as , ,,. chairrnan of the State Associa- tion Awards Committee. Served as Master of Ceremonies at the Association af Minnesota ; Emergency Managers Conference. Designed and wrote a public reiations pamphlet and served on tlie Public Affairs Committee for the Metro- � politan Emergency Managers Association. Com- pleted Federal Ernergency Management Agency self-directed caurses entitled "Emergency Pro- gram Manager", "Ernergency Management USA", Radiological Emergency Management" and,"Preparedness Planning for a Nuclear Cri- „ sis". �As a result, earned 4 semester credits, , At- tended 2b hours of State sponsored Emergency Preparedness training at the Arden Hilis-Training Center. Appointed by the County Board as rep- resentative to the Dakata County Emergency Medical Services Committee. �Served as:observ-. er for emergency drilis in Anoka and Ramsey �� Counties. � -5- PATROL DIVISIOl� AUTO 'THEFT D.W.I. ARREST BURGLARY CRIMINAL DAMAGE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT LARCENY (THEFT) TRAFFIC TICKETS FALSE ALARMS PUBLIC ASSISTS TRAFFIC WARNINGS CALLS FOR SERVICE SECURITY CHECKS ALL ACTIVITIES 1 every 2.5 days 1 every 1.8 days 1 every 1.7 days 2.5 each day 2.5 each day 3 each day 4 each day 19 each day 21 each day 60 each day 1 every 19 days 1 every 7 days 1 every 6 days Pro-File Hugo Blackfelner, Police Officer "Butch" was a Maplewood Police Rescrve OfGccr when he decided that he enjoyed it well enough to make law enforcement his career. 1989 is his 20th year wilh the Mendota Heights Police Department. Hugo is a Federally licensed fire- arm dealer and he and his family live in Inver Grove Heights. He recently finished the con- struction of a hunting cabin on property he owns in Northern Minnesota. -6- 0 0 �y-,�. � r� � ,. . ' *;,��-. �,..:�R. , ' -rne . . �. 'y +t• . , . _ s � H . 'j i � i The e2even members af the Patrol I7ivisian average 42 years of age and neariy 14 years of experience. They are an the street representing the City of Mendata Heights 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The excellent results, and near ab- sence of camptaints, is evidence that ihey do their job very welt, A number of the Patrvl Divisians activities aze individually tabulated on a daily basis. Although they are not all- rnctnsive, they give us an idea af the type and amount of tasks perfarmed. They are illustrated below: �• ]tEACTIVF � Ufficers respond ta directian, requests ar assignment. Radio Cails Assist another of�cer or department Assist the p�blic � Follow ap an earlier report TCITAL ' ' 12$$ 12$2 3,647 3,651 2,071 2,016 752 645 _� � 7,365 7,035 PROACTIVE � -- An officer ta%es acdon as a result of something helshe has seen oz heard. � 'Off�cerinitiated regarts Verbal warnings ' Crime preventian Written warnings TOTAG , �CITATION AND„Aj��,� Olfenses abserved that require court dispositian. Trafrc Violations . Misdemeanor, Gross Misd. and Felony arrests , TpTAL 1,274 1,428 45 2 3,041 677 � 952 i,355 � 1,225 24 • • � • 3I2 2,916 905 .�. 1,336 •, ' S,�''� iC RIT�' AND ADMjNISy RATIV . D�.TAI .S ' _, Of�cers cheek a"vacation" hame or a etosed business glace, or perform duties ar tasks that do nat require a sworn Peace Officer. , . �Security checks Administrative details TUTAL Donn Anderson, P�irc�i 5erge�tnt Donn was hired by Mendota Hcights in Januttry of 1980, but had scrvcd tours as a Police Officer in Lilydaie and as Depaty Police Ctiief of Glen Rock, Wyomin�. He was promoted to Patrol Ser- geant in 19$6.� Donn's many duties include schedulin� and lraining of�iccr. He obtained fiis degree in Iaw En- forcement at Inver Hills C,C. Axi avid hunter and fisher- ' man, I}ann artd his wife enjoy a summcr hame in Norihcm Minnesota. _ W�� 6,865 7,510 2 4 3.231 9,360 10,7�t l. -r�� Larrie iYlack, Pafrc�l Sergeani. "ie" received his formal eciucation at Sibley �iigh'School and Inver Hills C.C., but his prifnary law enforcement knowledge comes from eight years with the West St� Paul Police Depaztment and nearty ten years with Mendota Heights. Lanie was prompted to Sergeant in 19$7 and aiso servcs as a Dakata County Fira- arm's Instructor. His adciitional responsibilities include the management and maintenance of the Degartments vehicles and equipment. PATRt�L I3I,"V�ISIO� PATR(?L ACTIVTTY Ti� yATEt;f�l►RY Radia Calls Officer Initiated Activity Assist Officer or Agency .i�.SS1St �.'2t1Z�21 Follow Up I2eport or Tnvestigation Moving Vialatians Parking Violarions Verbal Warnings Misderneanor Arrests C'aross Misdemeanor Arrests Felony Arrests Warrant Arrests Crime Prevention Activiries Security Checks Administrative I7etails Written Warnings TOTAL Edward Vaillancourk, Patrol 4fficer. Hired by Marty Baidwin, Ed started out part-time in June, and went fuli-time in Septembcr of 19'17. He has deveIoped �he reputation for bein� in lhe right plac at the right time. As a result, he was in- vqlved in several major felony arrests in 1989. Ed and his family are tong-time Saulh St. Paul residents, 3647 1274 2071 752 895 677 173 142$ 211 16 14 34 45 6$b5 2495 294 20,891 Pr�i-1+ i1e Dona Currie, Patrol OFficer. Dona came to Mendota Hei�hts with eleven years of law enforcement experience as a Reserve Of�cer and Jail Matran so the handling af prisaners and sus- pects was not new to her. She and her husband live in Rochester wherc Dana earned her Associates I?e�ree in Law Enfarcement at Rochester Communily College. : 3657 1355 2016 711 64S 744 161 1225 324 23 36 51 24 7510 3�31 � 22,028 David Olson, Patrol OPPicer 1989 was i deCnitciy a year of changc far David. I He was hireci as a Mendota Heiglits Po- lice C?ffcer, got married and bou�ht a house. Our newest member, Dave was � Community Service Officer ir� Columbi� Heights in Aprit, 19$9 when we hired him. A graduate of Norlh Hennepin Comrnunity CoIiege, he has an uncie who is prescntly a Police Captain in a ._metro c3e�artment. � � �.J..R' ��q �:eq�1.F �.r�iY»•, r :f�� 'FT �i ifV«*�� I ., "'f :� � . , �y � v . � . �� `.teK��h ' ' t � t . ... � '� . . � �� - PATR(3I.,��DIVISIOI'� .�; , . �.989 PATROL V�HICLES The Departznent has four marked police squads that are operated on a rotating basis throughout the year. The marked squads, Chev- rolet Caprices, are each equipped with a I�ustam moving radar, first aid kit, oxygen, camera, shotgun and "unlock" taols. The four mazked squads lagged a total of 147,531 xniles in 1989 with a total gas consumption of 14,071.6 gallons. This is an increase of 10,84$ miles and 1,376.7 gallons over 1988. The average gas . . cansumption for 19$9 was 10.5 mpg compared to i0.8 mpg for 1988. • , 0 0 0 �r � ' 1� ,- _ e r ' � Orie hundred farty seven thousand five hundred and thirty one �. ,., - ' :rz�iles is equal to six trips around the world. The four marked4 , , . • ` squads each travelled the equivalent af 1 1/2 times around the . � , � a' , worTd ar, if you would rather, � six� round trips to (Jmaha, . ' ' ^ ' Nebraska. � . • � ' . - „ , , .. "" ..' •---� _.. . ' ' ' ' • -_ =.' ` --' . _ ., _. . . . . . _ . _, ., .. _ . . .....,.._...._._ _ . -9- INVESTIGATIVE DIVISION Although it may seem unusual to call two peo- ple a Division, these two people do enough work to qualify for that title. Sgt. Dorrance Wicks was joined by Investigator Larry Bridger in April of 1989 and together they have formed a very com- petent and hard-working team. Hundreds of re- ports each year require some form of follow-up by the invesrigators. A typical investigation may take weeks or months, and many such cases are juggled at the same time. The better we are at what we do, the more work we generate. The combination of good work "on the street", good documentation, by the Patrol Division, and skill- ful follow up by the Investigators results in more charges and convictions. }Svnopsis of Major Cases -1989 Mendota Pot I'arm. At 8:30 p.nl. EVfde on 1/17/89, members from the Men- dota Heights Police, BCA, DEA, and Dakota County Sheriff's Department served a search warrant and made arrests at 1336 Sibley Memorial Highway. This was the cul- mination of a three month joint in- vestigation. Along with the three adults arrested, two million dol- lars worth of marijuana was confiscated. According to , State officials, this was the ��" largest indoor marijuana farm- ing operation ever seen in the midwest. The "Sibley Incident". On March 23, 1989, in the early mornings hours, four males entered Henry Sibley High School and caused neazly five million dollars in damage. Due to the exi- gency of the crime scene, a large team of Investi- gators and evidence technicians was assembled and put to work. Four suspects were arrested within 40 hours of the attack. They have since pled guilty to other crimes and have been sen- tenced. Parker House RobUery. On 8/6/89 the Parker House was robbed by two armed men. Quick re- sponse by Officers allowed for the apprehension of one of the suspects, and the stolen car, along with all the money. The second suspect escaped into the river bottoms. Charged was a local resi- dent, who had a prior criminal record for armed robbery. Thefts From Vehicles. On 8/21/89 at 0150 hrs. quick thinking Officers responded to a call for help at the apartment complexes located in the 2300 block of Lexington Ave. So. Witiiin min- utes, Officers located and arrested four juveniles from Southern Dakota County. Property was re- covered that the suspects had taken from several cars located in the underground garages. The apartrnent complexes on Highway 13 in Lilydale and the apartments on Lexington had been plagued during the summer by this type of theft. � Needless to say, the problem has .��'��nh. lessened since then. � -' Gun Shop Burglary On November 3, 1989, in the ear- � ly morning hours, Bill's Gun Shop, in Lilydule, was the vicrim of a "smash and �nab" burglary and 13 rifles were tak- en. Investigation led us to a hous- ' ing project in St. Paul. With assistance from interpreters from the Hmong community, and the St. Paul Police Department, six males were arrested and charged, and eleven of the ri- fles were recovered. The burglars ranged in age from 12 to 17 years old and several of tliem were involved in previous burglaries and auto thefts in Mendota Heights prior to this incident. Pro-rile D. Wi�liam Wicks, Sergeant - Investibator. A for- mer Marine, "Shorly" readily acceptcd the challenge of replacing Gene Lange as the Deparlmen�'s chief criminal Invesdgator. Hired in 1969, he was promot- ed to Sergcant in 1976 and served as �he Dcpar�ment's only "front line" supervisor for 10 years. He lives in South St. Paul where his falher was a Police Of�cer and he served a term as a City Council member. "Shorly" has also been a Dakota County Firearms In- structor for the past 11 years. ` -10- ��'i�;�ihs 1 �:��.�'.�.�a: '.+r,� "b" '-- �ti �� a 3y� ��k :{ . `G" i�' :. �!: s- F. ,�, , 'fr tif� .. { - � .:;2��# ' ' � ; - » -�. ,� . . . ' � , . . '1 ♦ a�: a � '�. .r�. . �] INVESTIGATIVE DIVISION EQUIPMENT - "._� During 1989, three majoi items were purchased� �' for the Investigation Division. The first was a" - Minolta 35min Maxxum 7000i camera with ac-' cessories. Total cost was $1,194.80. This was - purchased through donated funds from the Men-_ . dota V.F.W. Club. The camera is one of the fn- est auto-focusing SLR cameras made. It has a1- lowed the Invesrigation Division to maximize _�_ their capabilities at crime scenes. The camera lens will also allow us to take close-up photo-• graphs of latent fingerprints developed by dust- ing. _ The second item was a 6 foot wide Labconco Explosion_proof Fuming Hood, cabinet base, and blower. Purchase price was $4,970.00. This' � unit is used in the Crime Lab of the larger Police - Departments. Both Investigators are trained in the processing of physical" evidence for latent fingerprints. The unit allows us to use differenr •' techniques to develop prints. For example: #1-The use of powders -(white, black, gray, red and magnetic). The blower exhausts the powder - away from the technician and the fan moves it out of the building. ' #2 - The use of chemicals. The most common is called the ninhydrin process. The chemicals that are used must be mixed and can be hazmful if they are inhaled. The blower pulls these fumes out of the cabinet and out of the building as well. The ninhydrin process is used on paper and other porous surfaces. ' Pro-File i.aLrence Brid��r. Investiga or. Larry had over three yeazs of experience as a Police Officer in Cali- fornia when he and his wife decided to return to Min- nesota to live. He was hired in Mendota Heights in August, 1975. RecenQy assigr►ed as Investigator, Larry is quickly adjusting to "driving a desk" and writing reporis. He received his Associates Degree from Chaffey College in California and is pursuing a B.A. at Metro, U. Larry and his family live in Rose- mount� used to identify several criminals, by their fin-- ' gerprints, since we began using it this year. The hood, blower and fuming tank have saved us a lot of time and money. We no longer have to "farni" as much of our work out to the St: Paul� � •Police or Minnesota BCA crime labs. This was a costly process and results often "took two to � three weeks. We also;have better control over ,, our evidence when we keep it "in-house" from the time it is collected until the time it is used. #3 - In the base of the Labconco unit, there is a special plexiglass tank that was built by Master Glass, Inc. of Lakeville. This tank allows for'an- �, other method of bringing up latent fingerprints on certain surfaces. This process is called the cyanoacrylate (Super Glue) vapor process. • � The item to be processed, which could be as long as a rifle, or as small as a bullet, is placed in the � tank.. The tank is covered, and the item is left for about thirty minutes with the cyanoacrylate .� packet. It is checked periodically until the latent. �' prints are developed. This whole unit has been , � . . . . _ . . _ :� _. _ -11- DAYS & TIMES Some of the data that we collect lells us the days and times when most of our crimes are committed. Here is that informadon as it pertains to four of our more popu lar events: . � • Burglary Twenty-three of our burgl�tries were re- ported on Monday (11) and Tuesday (12) while " Wednesday was the day when a burglary was least like ly to be committed. The favorite time of day for bur- glary reports was between 4:00 and 8:OU p.m. Larceny These were spread all over the week, - wilh the most on Thursday and the fewest on Sunday. The favorite limes were between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Vandalism Vandalism was commitled almost equally, each day of the week. Like lazceny, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. was the most popular time frame. D.W.I. It makes sense that most of our drunk drivers were arrested between midnight and 4:00 a.m. The most popular day for overdoing it was Friday, af- ter a tough week at work. � STATISTICS Traffic Accident Data Reports of traffic accidents that occur in Mendota Heights on a State highway or freeway are gener- ally taken by the Minnesota State Patrol. The Patrol may also be called in to assist in the reconstnic- tion of serious, or very complex accidents. All other accident reports aze written by local Officers. Accidents that involve personal injury, leaving the scene, or property damage in excess of $500, must be reported to the State. Reports that do not meet those criteria remain in house and aze not listed on the drivers' record. � Fatal Accidents Hit and Run (Personal Injury) Hit and Run (Property Damage) Personal Injury Accidents Property Damage Accidents TOTALS 1� 1.�$$ �2$ � 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 2 2 42 42 45 122 1S8 I51 166 202 200 David Olmstead, Patrol Officer Dave has served over 22 years with the Mendota Heights Police Department and his son has now become a Police Officer with another agency and will carry on the Olmstead law enforcement aadition. Dave is a member of lhe Army Reserve and spends two weeks each summer as a supply sergeant. He also serves on the City Safely Com- mittee and represents his fellow of�cers as Union Steward. nFFENSE REPORTS Offenses are categorized by the Federal Bureau of Investigation by their severity. Part I Offenses are generally considered to be the most serious. Part II includes most other criminal offenses while Part III through V axe considered minor or non-criminal in nature. Part I We show a 12% increase in Part I Offenses. That is due to an enormous increase in Larce- ny (theft). This increase was caused by a rash of thefts from vehicles and the reduction in our mini- mum on "NSF" and "Account Closed" checks. Residential and commercial burglaries showed slight declines. part TI Another 12% increase, impacted primarily by increases in damage to property (associated with thefts from vehicles) and arrests made for marijuana, liquor law violations and DWI. Parts TTi - V These "catch-all" categories actually show a decrease of 2.5%. -12- 9 ;� ....,i - F - t : _' .-- . . . ' ' , h 3. • „ . ' ^> � � STATISTICS . � COMSINED OFFENSE REPORT 1987 -1989 � � Part I Offenses Homicide Manslaughter Rape Attempt to Rape Robbery, azmed Robbery, strong arm Burglary, residendal Larceny Auto Theft Burglary, Non-residential TOTALS Part II Offenses Aggravated assault • Other assaults (simple) Arson Forgery, counterfeiting Fraud Stolen Property (poss, sale, etc) Criminal Damage to Property Weapons Violations ' Other Scx Offenses Narcolics Mazi juana Synthetic Drugs Olhcr Dangerous Drugs Offenses against Family & Children D.W.I. Liquor Law Violations Drunkcnness Disorderly Conduct All Olhcr Offcnses TOTALS 12$Z l� 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 1 2 2 2 2 32 36 195 73 10 18 1Q 28 262 263 3 4 15 17 2• 0 6 10 • 18 19 0 1 123 128 0 1 6 7 -1 2 4 - 4 0 . . 0 0 0 5 10 55 . 24 13 26 2 9 8 8 $Z . � 348 355 12�2 0 0 0 1 1 0 34 • _ 215 19 � 295 0 22 0 2 12 1 140 0 9 1 10 0 0 7 - 51 39 7 10 � • 398 � r'� . . . ' . �. ^ .. . . ^ . . ' -13- STATI�TI�S COMBINET3 O�FE SE REP�RT 1987 -1989 Part T�i - V t)ffenses Suspicion Rnnaways Vialadon of Road & M.V. Laws Parking Violations LostJFound Persans LostJFound Property LostlFound Animais Losk/Faund Vehicles Fatal MV Accidents Personal Injury MV Accidents H& R Persanal Injury Accs Praperty Damage MV Accidents H& R Property Damage MV Accs Public Accidents (Falls, drowning, etc) Home & Occupational Accs Sick Cared Far Mental Cases Suicide Firearms Accidents Sudden Death, Badies Found Animal Bites Damestic Atarms, Residential Alarms, Non-residendal P�blic Assists Miscellaneous Service (public init.) Misceiianeous Sarvice (officer init.} Fires TOTALS GRAND TOTALS � 269 25 87 zo 11 44 5 0 0 42 1 122 1 6 28 lb7 4 6 1 1 12 58 513 223 498 506 327 241 � 3q0 15 1S5 3 5 32 5 3 0 42 Q 1S8 2 6 24 149 1 5 0 7 9 42 �a2 230 501 695 476 2� 3,222 3,'732 3,832 4,350 -34- � 29$ 2 197 2Q 6 47 2 a 2 4S 0 151 2 3 33 l�'1 4 4 0 4 7 32 614 310 440 60b 432 2�0 3,b38 4,331 , , .... , � ., . � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO January 30, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and.City Administrator FROM: Tom Olund �� Public Works Superintendent SUBJECT: New 3/4 Ton 4 X 4 Pickup with Plow DISCUSSION• Approved in the 1990 Parks budget was a the purchase of a 3/4 ton four wheel drive pickup with plow. The amount budgeted was $19,000. There will be no trade in as anticipated keeping the old truck as an additional vehile for plowing cul-de-sacs and for use by the part-time helpers in the summer. We have received the following four quotes for the pickup: Grossman Chevrolet (Burnsville) $14 400 Southview Chevrolet 14,983 Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet 16,084 Arrow Pontiac - GMC 17,879.55 We received two quotes for the snowplow. They are as follows: LaHass Gnerer Welding, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: $ 1,892 2,079 I recommend that the pickup be purchased from Grossman Chevrolet for the amount of $14,400 and the snowplow be purchased from LaHass in the amount of $1,892. This vehicle and snowplow to be funded by Park and Recreation Capital Outlay. ACTION REOUIRED: If Council concurs with the my recommendation they should pass a motion authorizing preparation of purchase orders to Grossman Chevro- let in the amount of $14,400 and to LaHass in the amount of $1,892. TJO:dfw � Mendota Hea.ghte Police Department t++�EMOR.ANI7UM DATE: January 23, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council City Administrator E'ROM: Poliae Chie�\� SUBJECT: Purchase of 199d S�ad �ars � �NTR4DUCTIdN Council autharized $27,OOQ for the purchase of two 1990 marked squad cars. The results of tha Ramsey County--St Paul joint purchasing agreement are in and orders must be plaaed kay February 15th. DISCUSS�'ON Chevrolet was the low bidder again with its Caprice. Viking Chevralet was the law bidder and wan the con�.ract far 300+ cars. The base price of the vehicles is $12,709 each. Our options add $lp1.14 to �he price of each vehicie iar a total cost af $25,620.28. That is approximately $l, 400 unde.r the amount bucigeted. RECOMMENDATION That Cauncil authorize the purohase of two Chevralet Capra.ce squac3 cars fram Viking Chevrale� in accorclance with the Ramsey County-St Paul joint purchasing bid at a cost of $25,620.28 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO January 30, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer SUBJECT: Recommended Increase for City Mileage Reimbursement Rate The City policy is currently to reimburse 24 cents per mile for use of a personal vehicle on City business. We understand that the Internal Revenue Service has now increased the allowable reimbursement to 26 cents per mile, and are recommending that the City of Mendota Heights go to that level. There is actually ver� little use of personal vehicles for City business. The primary users are engineering technicians, with the costs being charged back to the projects. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with this recommendation, it should pass a motion increasing the City's mileage reimbursement rate to 26 cents per mile. LES:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO February 2, 1990 To: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator � From: Kevin Batchelder, Aclministrative Assistartt � Subject. Resolution Revising Administrative and Engineering Fees nzscUssiox The previous City Administratar, Kevin Frazell, had directad staf� to prepare any revisions necessary in order to bring the fee structure up ta date for 2990. The at�.ached resolutian shows the fee rate structure propo�ed to ga in�o effect. It includes changes to the fees for Administrative, Engineering, Building, and Police services. The Planning fees will also be proposed ta be updated. The Planning fees will be proposed in conjunction with the new Zoning 4rdinance that will be reviewed soon in a CounciljPlanning Commission workshop. At that t�ime we will consider new planning iees, as well as new escraw procedures. Each department reviewed their old fee rates to come up with the revisians pr�oposed tonight. The last time the fee structures were revised was 1987. Reven:ues for the 1990 Budget are not expected ta be impacted by the propased changes. The next few paragraphs will explain the proposed changes by department. Administrative Fees There are not whalesale changes to the Administrative fees. On dog licenses we now have equal opportunity. Neutered animals of either sex are proposed to be $3 and non-neutered anirnals af either sex $6. Large data maps hav� had the printing cost� added in addition to the original $10 fee. Mailed agenda and mailing casts are new fees, as is a newsletter subscription far non-residen�s. Staff time and material� far large projects on photo copying is proposed ta be raised from $12.50 per haur ta $20 per hour ta reflect current wage costs. Photocopies of plats is a new item and is praposed to be $1.00. Research of records, files, etc. reflects the new proposed $20 per hour for staff time. Returned checks is a new fee and the $15 charge is similar to businesses and bank�. This item is expected to be minimal and infrequent in occurrence. AlI other fees remain the same. � Engineerinq Enternrise Fund Charqe for Services Engineering fees are based on staff time being computed on the basis of 250� of the employees hourly base compensation rate, therefore, there are no proposed changes as the rates for Engineering Services increase with wage increases. Building Fees We are including building fees in this resolution for the purpose of having all the fees in one document. Many of the building fees were established in various ordinances or building regulations and are now listed in the proposed resolution as they are established by these other authorities. On Residential Plumbing, the Alter and Repair fee is proposed to change to 1� of value with a$10 minimum. This is a much easier formula for the Code Enforcement Office to administer and does not impact the amount of fee paid or the revenues generated. Commercial Plumbing, as well as, Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning inspection have adopted this formula also. Staff does not anticipate any significant changes in Building fee revenues from using these new formulas. With the minimums proposed, any changes in revenues derived from these fees will be in an upward direction. All state required surcharges have been maintained in the proposed fees. Police Fees Accident Reports are proposed to increase for additional pages and prices for photos have been added. Copy of Drivers Licenses is proposed to increase from no-charge to $5 to cover staff time involved. All other items remain the same. ACTION REOIIIRED If Council so desires, they should establish the new Structure of Fees by adopting Resolution No. 90- , A RESOLUTION REVISING SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, ENGINEERING, BUILDING AND POLICE SERVICES. CITY 4F MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNES4TA RE50LUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION REVISING SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR ADMTNISTRATIVE, ENGSNEERING, BUTLDING AND PQLICE SERVICES, WHEREAS, the City af Mendota Heights adopted Resolu�ion No. 87-25, "Rasalution Revising Schedule of Fee� far Administrative and Engineering Services" on March 3, 1987; and WHEREAS, the cast a� services rendered is ever-increasing; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate that fees be revised to cover the increasing costs in praviding the services and that new fees be established. NQW THEREF4RE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that Attachment A (Attachm�nt A to Resalution 90- ) listing the 5chedule of Fees i.s hereby approved and adopted. Adopted by the City Council. of the City of Mendota Heights this 6th day of February, 1990. CITY COUNCIL � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swansan, City Clerk 0 "ATTACHMENT A TO RESOLUTION NO. 90 - Administration & Engineerina Fees Type of Service Assessment Search Assessment Split As-built plans Certif ications City Ordinance Book Comprehensive Plan (each part) Comprehensive Plan (plates 2-19) Critical Area Plan Critical Area Ordinance Critical Area Map Dog Licenses Election Filings Land Use Map Large Data Maps Storm Sewer Sanitary Sewer Watermain Streets Land Use Legal Description (written) Mailed Agenda Mailing Costs Newsletter Notary Fees Size N/A N/A 24x36 N/A N/A N/A 30X36 N/A N/A 30X36 Male unneutered Male neutered Female unspayed Female spayed N/A 30x36 1" = 400' 60 x 66 � 0 tt n N/A N/A Outside City � Fee $10.00 $25.00 base & engineering and clerk time $ 3.00 $ 5.00 $45.00 $ 7.50 $ 5.00 $ 7.50 $ 3.00 $ 5.00 $ 6.00 annually $ 3.00 annually $ 6.00 annually $ 3.00 annually $ 2.00 $ 5.00 $10.00 plus printing costs $ 5.00 $20.00 annual $ 1.00 min. $ 5.00 annual Free for residents r � � � S Photo Copies 1 to 2 pages Plats 24x36 Plats (photocopy, partial) Police Accident Reports N/A Research of Records, Files, etc. Returned check Storm Sewer maps Streets Subdivision Ordinance Topographic Map Watermain Maps Wetlands Ordinance Wetland & 5torm Sewer Systems map Zoning Ordinance w/map Zoning Map N/A 30X36 30x36 N/A up to 24x36 30x36 N/A 30x36 N/A 30x36 .25 Larger jobs, .04 per page plus $20.00 per hour for staff time and materials. $ 5.00 $ 1.00 $ 5.00 $10.00 - 15.00 if over 5 pages w/pictures $ 5.00 base fee plus $20.00 per hour for staff time and materials. $15.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 per acre $ 9.00 service charge $ 5.00 $ 2.00 $ 5.00 $15.00 $ 5.00 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE FUND POLICY ON CHARGES FOR SERVICES It is the intent of the City of Mendota Heights that the City's Engineering Department shall be operated in the same manner as private enterprise for funding purposes. Charges for engineering services shall therefore be based on the philosophy that the Department shall be totally self- supporting and may end each year with a positive Fund balance. All costs for department operation, including such costs as personal services and office rental shall be borne entirely by the Engineering Enterprise Fund and shall be anticipated by an annual operation budget. Engineering charges shall as nearly as possible reflect rates which the City would otherwise incur for consultant engineering services. Unless future experience indicates changes must be made, the following schedule of rates shall apply: SCHEDULE OF RATES Public Improvement Proiects Type of Service Preliminary studies Feasibility reports Plans and Specifications Project construction amount under $100,000 Project construction amount over $100,000 Field inspection and staking Litigation Assessment roll preparation Final construction contract amount under $100,000 Rate Time and materials* Time and materials* (Credit shall be given for information which can be used in plan & specification preparation) Time and materials* 70 of final contract amount Time and materials* Time and materials* Time and materials* r � Final construction contract amount over $100,000 Miscellaneous charges Professional services on planning cases Assessment splits Miscellaneous engineering and drafting services 1% of final contract amount First hour per case included in retainer. Thereafter, time and materials.* Time and materials* Time and materials* * Time shall be computed on the bases of 250% of the employees' hourly base compensation rate. � BUILDING FEES Resolution Ordinace � Number & Section Buildina Permit Fees UBC Table 3A 222 502 Adopts UBC Table 3A Fees State Surcharge Buildina Alterations Same as building permit 501 Buildinq Movinct Permit $50.00 app. Fee 503 (4.1) Swimminct Pools Same as building permit 401(4.8)1 Fence Permit $10.00 plus • .50 sur- charge Plumbinq Residential 1st Full $30.00 Each Add'1 Bath (New Constr.) $ 5.00 1/2 & 3/4 Rough-In Add'1 Bath - Reqires 2 Exsisting Residence insepctions $30.00 Alter & Repair 1% of value min. $10.00 Fixtures after Each full, 1/2 $ 1.00 Rough-in or 3/4 Private Sewage Permit Fee $15.00 Private Sewage Plan Check $15.00 Surcharge .50 a Resolution Ordinance Number & Section Plumbinct Commercial Fixture Repairs & Alter 1� of value 1% of value surcharge Fees min. $30.00 min. $10.00 .50 Heatinq, Ventilation, Air Conditioninq Residential New Heating 1% of Value min. $30.00 Air Conditioning 1% of Value min. $10.00 Alter or Replace- 1% of Value min. $10.00 ment Heating Swimming Pools Permit Fee $15.00 Surcharge .50 Special Inspections - Gas Line (Commercial & Residential) $20.00 Surcharge .50 Heatina. Ventilatina, Air Conditionina Commercial & Industrial New 1% of Value min. $30.00 Alter or Replace- ment 1a of Value min. $30.00 Surcharge Electrical Permits Handled by State of Minnesota Street Charae Sewer or water water surcharge Sewer surcharge .50 $75.00 $5.00 .50 $17.50 .50 0 Type of Service Accident Reports POLICE FEES Photos 3x5 5x7 8x10 Adoption check Alarm Ordinance Fine Copy Drivers License Dog Licenses Fingerprint Foster Care Check Handgun Transfers License to Sell Guns Permit to Carry Weapon Report Copy Mendota Heights Resident Male unneuter Male neutered Female unspayed Female spayed Mendota Heights Resident Fees First page $5.00 .25 each additional page $ 2.00 $ 5.00 $10.00 N/ C $25.00 for 4th Additional $10 for each over 4 $5.00 � $6.00 annually $3.00 annually $6.00 annually $3.00 annually N/C N/C N/ C $25.00 N/ C Same as accident report :��• � i- CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO January 31, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administrator FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Property Classification INTRODUCTION We have received the 1990 notification of tax forfeited property from the County Auditor. Only one parcel of land, Lot 3, Block 2, South Ridge, is subject to forfeiture proceedings. Council should take action to classify the parcel as non- conservation land to allow its sale, or to classify it as non- conservation land and request that it be transferred to City ownership. The�engineering staff have looked at the parcel of land to determine whether there is a public need for the lot. After review, they have concluded that there is no significant reason why it should not be sold for residential development. RECOMMENDATION � We recommend that Council classify Lot 3, Block 2, South Ridge Addition, as non-conservation land so that it can be sold for non-payment of taxes. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass a motion certifying Lot 3, Block 2, South Ridge as non-conservation land. �, ;� � �� NW CORNER GOVT. LOT N0.7 Ngg•53�49�E ''� s�� 658. GI NOTT NO � jE OF GOVT. � • . � ; 'r ' ,��:� :.�.00 •:soo ��s�a ,�s.,, ,�o.000' �' t . � 31t ' I� � fC �UTILITY � � � � " _ � � EASfMENT ' � r .' � � A _ (J� l q I I " 0, r p — i ;�l o < , ,:is v � I �� ,� 0 � o g o �, i 6 . a , v T- ' Ig I � •') :� �C•� ? � °n 3 �C � 4 . 1 µ'Z uTiuTr � T�6�, lNG( � ` o � O� ' �- � i,� I onaiNac[ FA•iFMENT D 1-0 (f ' o � � o .\��.' > ��:`:, u 4 0l �^ r ��,, . d ' ' � � M O (A I�A . n I� I �--? �� O,.o: x ti�,a• ..Ato a.�O . Z' �` � Fx� E . . i---1 ' - o- .00-- - - - -�zs.00-- - :1 - 9iq�.�`� i 1 I : ' � � I _ N19'57��9"[ ._ .._ ni 6q�l�'t � l7j li� i • � � u's» ' �— °°�s°s rz��. E N , • i I . �� p. �S \�� J�: �� y �u�, � �° � . '� Il G_. _ _ _I00:00-_ - -/00.00_ _ _ _90.A0�- 'iJ•�',r ♦ C� i'��'N'a�� O %' � N ; �591 1595 lfi99 � 1G0� � y6�,`'. ` � "N,_,1N�_ .� M g �, I : o I 3 P 14 � • t 5 io•o' -: "��''� �� 6 � � Y �;� . W 6 i . o � o n o', 5q� z� �"� �3'i. � E ��F u ^. I ^„ n o p h p`o4' y��i�� ,(J >>�L�o�, Q I( I ' n . 0' °� �°%�� ` �a �� •k m y ,� Q a I � � $ . g Z 1�M1• y yo �`� ,�� Q� ��, �,. � ' �F o p �N �.9ls3 •N'E Z N tMJ7it'E2 `" -� .N � � 6 6� ° ^Q�\2� `= � 7 \ .Z� p � 124.1c �oaoo `'D, y �. o n � . ;�� ^ ��.i.00 ,a.a. � � y� �,,�; � aoo �� , , . 6 . w W n � � � 4 �, s. 05� �o d e, � �C� .'..0 O r .�� $ � ; ��'� V`' (�� °M ' 17 �'k�io��.°,',�°=..''t:',M. tii•. ", �G �`�. ' j P 1 p 1 � � y� �j� y � , 'W N I i I .,' ^ L � � o':� '�'F� � : q�y�o �q�'( '�J „ \ n) Q � p• .�� 1 , , \ps' � � � �z f I I��1� ♦ O �^ N B7•Oo' N �v � � o `�� • � m: i • W ti � 1c• • =Q Q� �L. �L �o °'� \ M a � � �. �'• ,a y 1�3:HI'_ ♦70 �jT� 'f y G /51.90 H{ tZ'� ~ f•~ \1 •,�Nb�yO 1 ^ .F o efsii 'c y�� 4.�; �So!��N�� s `, 4,b �, N,,�eo ` v,�Qo��o�� d,��e`� ��v. � / ' .LL m 17A3 I � �� O�J. i� 3� � D +'j� � 8� r� •`��s.lc p`�f, �j�0 � �� i I i o .•. �°'1 4� �� -Q✓ \ro ��' �1 0 \ �N W � 47r4J._ 1�1 aJ� ` D�� ] �O � M�� ic•�E'a°�" t'y� � O 0./� P� ',O,Q" ��a cf � � I f, °o v `1 G p�. , � y \ � q.p � ' t � � � \� \\N �� te0 S�oo � etiV o� � 29p� m. �y�1 � � ` o\\ � Y1 � O i � 6'. � N 40• \� o ,�b ►h' • u � b°pa° o � �O O$ �' � �• , �+\? 1 0 � 5 i� o� o /6� 3 � g � �'-, � \: ��, �}-8 � ' u I � , �J� \� �� I � I � `\ `� �i�� SI.L�-: a .��tia '�a � �� o I � A •�YM H �NI�•s�'��..� �� \ D � rj'? , � �� y� 1y�� /] I] v"� uriutr �` . •� � _ � �'Lf.Oi /S.7s�`• JC\�y �� j�.�8 j n, Z G C. OO�� EA'aF.M//I:J �OM � I I ;..:C-�• `^P ' L IN� �iN , � i �in �O �O �p� D1` �� , �0 V g I � ? ' ^ I �` �4 ,� � j � '�i!D �Z � I t pG �� O w o , ,� , � i �� o.i8 oLu 2� ~'' £ � a� �`�p.0,�i%OV . 0 I�•lI��J7��9'[ ��M :•ze.s♦ ; d �/i�y,� { p Je;,: �` �3•', ' O � Il73.07 ^ � �sCo•a4's]•� ^p �i�lls��i"d3'ii�•Ju yyC�? `�. . � i � �� 1 iso.o��,. 2N�4� ra�,ti °' .i ►.'O$ , ' � ^ o I I � � p � '��,�It't✓�� ,:J y '`t% /� � . J1 � 0 Q 31.1� Q�� N � �' : z � ° � � 3 ' aC'; �� o'' 'a' �6 0 � ° : •t,`; �,7;v" ' 2 7 � �R Z i . r p� � �h � � w �r aavq'c i $ �� o. � N : t Q� l is�.s: U� o �� 5°O's�'ra�� o° 24 %� ��a��. %$1iL �,''i, °i � .� �s „ 8 � '' a.6j . � � . � . � I � O n I � � 0 • �J iD'�p� .• e c" ` i• . .'l. Q 8 I '^o e o° � : p � `Q°>.�>T,ir ' '%� > `s. / Z $ � � � ' P� 6�: O 1� 1 i[�X� V' 0 •{}: o� 0 5 � ti y �'�CL s 2 6 y. • O � , i , a ; � : 2 �.e 25 0- !q\� � • F�- a � � :,•»•4,•c �; t � s ' s.aa- ° o � ` � $ ^ •� � �/ . L� W V eo's�•�d' �t. � d i �� U � � �/12.00 b 1 'Q /So.o £ � , �L.i7 � Y ��y� I!o �O X� I I til � i00.00 � . i •y �� Wy � � . �i :�J � �ao.t� t.o�o^' p � lll TILITY 4 p S�d•2o' �4"E i / C A , 0 I J'. �0 rU i E�SEMCNT p � �O �� f � • i o'! 0 h. .� � � � '. � ao �3°�'� w� nd,h. a; � -�, q1�000'•C.r:�. �SJ'� n: C�ti� �� I J _��.�'�` t' / W'•j�ot,��r�y�;' ,Y , o;. h� h� �� .ea- s•d,� '� ��`�r!:�"z'.�i�' �� "y v "' � d- .o � i .�°•ea,�c/ h°i��'��,�":"-�.`.�'3;� ., i� , a; ' � N Ca• S7'49'E � �� 9.�i. ai'�rc`s:k} r'+'��-.(',} x a��,)y» � i. r � q n . . W IOA.0 G7 /�'i\ .:�CC�:n �f,�.:4✓�;�� ni`1 0'O "�1 y A/�-�� b ' Z r• � � � � i �`1 y�'r�.. :� A.: sr��, ac4.�,'�,0' � Q �li ? JO oi � 02'. '� d e o , z,•�a`;Q3: .r.�c,� � , o.o. NI �F z �M.si�wa�` � ��r .`� � y�:f.c��M'.µ�:i� �o OUTLOT A � '---i- - �_ro N i e. rx�say. •` !� : ,.� , • � I i � .W Q n 1 � lj �rfr:..�'Y:..:.�*Y �� 2. 1 .S h ;,k'�},'� t. � .3 J �1 I n �� .* r` � .J:�'. ,�-. �-: 10-M �� 1 � � � '! ^ T.�..4 t 1[l' d�f I i+ •� N :1 � � . •9�ry'y, y fy „ J � � ip I I � n ''L • I O . 3:i o� i I � � �o h Z �`�-`r`' �.• v�i O T Q� . n � y� ` sY, � 2 � � . � I � '' , } 112IL� =0.09 .S• I I io0oo 11�.64 J70.o► � . 1 000 7e0 IO� , ;Y.y»o, IZ6I.�i9 SOUTM LINE OF GOVT � ,•�1.30 S 89• 54' 36" W �or rvo. � Sw CORNER GOVT, l0T N0. 7 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO° ti TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administrator FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk SUBJECT: Polling Place Designation INTRODUCTION January 30, 1990 For many years, the former Council Chambers served aslthe Precinct 2 election polling place. This space is currently leased to private enterprise and is no longer available for election use. The purpose of this memo is to recommend that Council designate a change in two polling place locations and to request authorization to notify the affected registered voters. INFORMATION Precinct 2 encompasses all of the area of the City south of Highway 110 and east of I-35E. The only public building within this precinct is the Fire Station, which is used as the polling place for Precinct 6. Precinct 6 is located between I-35E and Lexington Avenue, south of T.H. 110. Its population is concentrated in the Curley's Addition and the Lexington Heights Apartments. ' The fire station is located within Precinct 2 and is very suitable in terms of size and accessability. I believe that it should be designated as the Precinct 2 Polling Place. There is no appropriate facility located in Precinct 6. City Hall, however, is very close to the precinct, meets statutory requirements, and is more convenient to the voters than the Fire Station. This precinct is very small, and the voters can be accommodated easily in the lower level expansion area or possibly in the large conference room. The only alternative to locating the Precinct 6 polling place at City Hall would be to divide the fire station into two polling areas. A combined polling place facility, however, presents problems of nightmare proportions for the voters; the judges and staff. I do not recommend this option. RECOMMENDATION I recommend that Council authorize that Fire Station as the Precinct 2 polling place Precinct 6 polling place. ACTION REQUIRED designation of the and City Hall as the � I I l If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should adopt the attached proposed "RESOLUTION DESIGNATING PRECINCT POLLING PLACES." I CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 90- RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING ELECTION PRECINCT POLLING PLACES , WHEREAS, Minnesota_Statute, Chapter 204B.16 requires City Council resolution for the dedication or rededication of election precinct polling places; and WHEREAS, the designated Precinct No. 2 polling place, 750 South Plaza Drive, is no longer available for election use; and WHEREAS, the only appropriate polling place facility within Precinct No. 2, the City's Fire Station, currently serves as the Precinct No. 6 polling place; and WHEREAS, City Hall meets the statutory requirements for a polling place location for Precinct No. 6; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the following be established as the polling place locations for General, City and Special Elections: Precinct No. 1 - Precinct No. 2 - Precinct No. 3 - Precinct No. 4 - Precinct No. 5 - Precinct No. 6 - Somerset Elementary School, 1355 Dodd Road, north gymnasium Mendota Heights Fire Station 2121 Dodd Road Mendota Elementary School 1979 Summit Lane, gy�inasium Henry Sibley Senior High School 1897 Delaware Avenue, Room A-241 Royal Redeemer Lutheran Church 1960 South Lexington Avenue Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the polling place locations herein established shall remain effective until redesignation by resolution of the City Council. ATTEST: Kathleen M. swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY �6, 1990 Blacktop License J & W Asphalt General Contractors Licenses A er Kas ner & Sons, Inc. B.T.L. Construction Blue Ribbon Construction Bream Builders Enebak Construction Company Irmiter Contractors & Builders J.M.S. Equities, Inc. MN Landmark Construction North Star Services Woodmaster Foundations, Inc. Masonr Licenses Crea ive Concre e Gabrelcik Masonry London Brick, Inc. Northland Concrete & ostertag Cement Simon Brothers Cement Twin Cities Concrete Masonry Co. Company Systems, Inc. Excavating Licenses Dawson, Inc. Parenteau Excavating Schulties Plumbing T.A. Schmidt & Sons Excavating Gas Piping Licenses Genz-Ryan Plum�& Heating Co. Innovative Heating & Air, Inc. Paragon Heating & A/C Twin City Furnace Co., Inc. Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses Efficient Air Control Htg. & A/C, Inc. Genz-Ryan Plumbing & Htg. Co. Innovative Heating & Air, Inc. Twin City Furnace Company Plaster License Donne y Stucco Rubbish Hauler License Mendota Heights Rubbish � .....y„ .��.-- nu.0 ucr� ..Iv-.cceuu 7 s�Eng.� �n_rlrY 7 Jt;�,g � �e� � C2airns �ist /90 20-PoZice �D-Paz'Xs �`age' 1 , ' � ;,, , ~ :.-t=1^.Y.��r'.1.8_Fhi_....�-_ r._,_._� �.�3_Y�,y,-4_f__.Mk:1�S1�k��.d�i.e-Y-S 3.0-B.ix.e- �O=P-,Zann.ing ` � � r �y 40-CEO &5-RecgcZing ._�ern�._t:.heck�3urrzf�et=- �--.---._._� ___.- - ------._�.-...- 9-D=�in..irn� 7 �'•,ntro.Z � 4� �`.i'tECi{ �Nurnber,� Venciur- .N�rne..-__�.,._-___.-----_...__..A, ccuur.�t CaGe---�....__._._., ..... -__�--w-----C,c�rnrnent.s�..�.__._.... _ Grncy+nt ,"^�; --�-�-�---�__r .�..�____ ��z,�-��1��.��_�.._.__ �.d��as_ � �� 1 A T& T 1.m1-4^ci�-P�::�T-:�+2� ld call� 1r.17 ��_...�l...w7 �'_tt�_-�- -- -•-- --------.�tZ�1.-�'�1.�Zt_�30_.3�Z_,_�. _ _1.cL.calls __ 2 43 `� .__�3.'�--__._ _._._ ..�._�._----------�- ----_...__ ----__� �, _ __.__.__. -t-�-�' - — r-� Tatals Temp Check Nt�rnbPr 1 ' iemr� Check Nurnber ��.��_....._ ..-.�.�_._.�__._.,. ___...._ _._ � _-�-�? Earl � Rr�dersc�n 3� Rssc.c' �i-1r4;=�2+-��1t2�-�� .._.-_._.__.------ street �inns %t14_k�� _ '� Eara1._�_Fa3�der.scra__8�.�ssc?c - - -..__._.tZt.i-4��:?Z�_ �:,�2?-5�_- . _. __. ___ __ _....._---.� �.�1^ee�_ � i_�-rS__. 12:.,. ��— _ -. ___.� ------ � �_.--4._ �- ------__ _..�._..______.,.._ �� --- ----.�...�..-- -- _ __..._._.� .__.�-.-------�-- 539 �� Tc�tals Ternp Check Nurnber �: .j Tar,ap Ch�ck fVr.�mt�er.__--. ---.- �----__ _--�.-___.-----__ _. _ ._.„.._ .__., ...,.__._ ._... ��._.. � 3 AiR�T � s�]-4^c14�-a7+�-7� �-- Feb svc '='1. �+.'-� � ._-3._J�S&.��_.._'_.__' ___. �__l�i, 4�i�.JZl-1t1S+��'�._'. ___.._._.-_....� �?b GvS:_�__.. . .�_�!t� L 3 FrT&T 15-4�1�?+-�6�-6� Feb svc Y�_.�'.r3 = _...-��xc�s IZt1-42.i1Zi-1a^ctZi-2�Zt___._ - ��b_�vc_-. . 3_ 96 r im ��____�_ _�,_.._._�—__ .__.__ .._� _�_._�� _. _ 46 tZ+4 � Tatals Ternp Check Number 3 ,r Ta»tp Cneck }Vttr,rber � 4 � ��H` #„ � 4 �Ace Nardwatwe -....-. _... �8-433.�'.i-Q»2+�-O.i�h � � misc splvs c3. 89 � 4 -------- - - -��__...____,_._._-_��.__�.------ 'c'3_ 89 '? 'LcStals Ternp_Check_N.umbe�__.____�_.,..---�--..._._�____._,_ .._.. _�___.__.._�____ . _ . 5 �Lrnn-�3aeck._T3.u.rabQr.� ._—�.- - --- ----- --- - ..�-�_�_Arnericar�._F�ayar�le.._&-F'�.ag--Co >h1-_fr�3,�'.,-;2i-3t2t_..__-.... _v __f1ag._2irrel_1.abc*• �E,.�R�� .�_....._.._�._._�___-- _. ---._...--..._. �_---_..,.� �_ �__�.�.-____-__.__ __._.-.___. _ ...... '�.6 _iZ�'�- Tc.tals TQm� L.t�eck Nurnber :1 . � 7ernp Check Ntrrr�ber 6 ---. �--�.`_.�----._._�-----_._.,..,r_�_. �£.yF+ra�erican ritati.c.r,al Bank�---- 3:�-4c��-t2��t�Zr-Q�rh Jv � bcr�d fee 4E5�s. L'�'�s - -b�.�._._..__.._...—. _..r_.__�.. _--.....-----�-----�_��.._._---....___.____-___-_u.W� 460.�Z+�� 3.cta:ts�:Pm�_�izec3c_hfunTber __._�-E,_- __.�_.--- ------_...-._ _-_—___ .-_Sernp _Cbeck _hlurnba>�-- --.__.l - ----.y___.......__.---- --------..__.------ -----_,....__.._.. ......._..___ _ - - .__-_.___ 7_fannal7.c�_.}�ea�ing__,___ ___ ._ _... .___tZ�1.-3:=�3_____ - -- --- -•-- -�--._._ _.ad,� htn�nerm._Fee�_.___.___ ._1;:. r@� ----------- ----- -� - - --- -- -- - - - - -- -- - � ._ ____.�.v^_...._ -._..!?L _-_---- Tc�i:als Temrv Ch�ck 1Jurntre�^ � --- _.__ .,_...._ _ � _� i; Feb 199a Claims List � _Eri,,_2.�1��,FJ�1 _�. �_.__ _Cit_y_ cf 12ends?ta�eights----_�.___.._._�_.__. � ��(?rnp Gh�Sk_ iJ4trnber" �---- `� ---------- ----------- ----•---�--- •— - •- ----• TernP= -- -- - - --_------- ChPck �I�sua,�e�l�eri.ds�z_N,�me_----------- --Anrc�s�n.�_C�d.e-----------------•---•---_�tmmen�s--- � Gage c ,+ . � �' ,-� e�P-Q�_Sc�r_,ip��er- Ir.��------�t�??�1�------------- - ---------------cc�rn��r_.�Ysiern_FIi__��_ �J�S.�:D_ — 9 fanp2e Ccan�uter Znc �1-'20i�Z+ comouter sys'r,ern FD .:;, 913..�4 .� 16 -- — - ---------- ------- 13� E54. 8'� —l_c�t�s-TPmp Che?ck N��rnbe�= S-- ---------- -------------------------------• --- .� .,� i'ernp Check Number 9 ____`__ _ _, __,_ _ � �Ai� G_ A Nf —i�.�4�3��T..�l�!�'.,�! -- --�?gt_-W�cks ., a0_ V+Qi _ � � � � _�.--.__ �LA_ 0Q� �'r_�t•a.is iPuip Check Number-- 9 -----T---•------�--------------------_ ---- - � Terrtp Che.ck Number 1� ` Y~--�--• ------ —�----- t iQ1 Assn of Mr� Emgcy Mgr�s �717-44�4-�0�-R+�2+ 199�2+ G��es �ID.00 i�T -------- ----- ---� --- -- c�. 0�h _—. Totals Terno CiIEC{( Nurnber 1� __�_�__ ��____,^__ _ _ } Ternp Check Ni�mber 11 11_Penke Com_anies �8-4335-�h�Z+ti�-�� _,____ � sv_c call _ Y2S.0� Tatals 7-em� Check Numher • Ternp Check Nurnber 18 li 12 E� 2 S Rutc� 9upply' 01-43?�h-44�-:_� wiper b.lades �.7'� I2 La i�• 3 Ruta 9upolv° �1-433d+-43�-7�h misc parts �?4.44 1;? R R• 3 Auto Supply' tZ�i-433�-tr9�-S� misc parts �.4.89 St? P R•__�_f'+uta Suou1�_ V.�1=433�D-47�Z±-�0 _ _niisc pa�^ts 27.94 1:= B&• J t�uta Supp]y� �i-4?3�71-49�-50 misc parts 58.34 __�? la_c�• J, Ruta 5�.��1y' �1-4330=4G!Z+•�,3�_ _^_ _� mzsr ,parts __ SG.:[7 1^ B 8• 3 Autc� Supp]y� ' tZ�l-43:rZ+-49�Z+-S� misc oarts 4�Z+_ 88 1��_��7_%iita SuF1�.�v� �.T1-4330-•4•3Q+-5Q�--------- return :�.95cr 1�= E+ &• ,S Autc. Supply� i5-433�-++7�2+-C�a rnisc Qarts 7.13 _ t�? R�_,�Autc� �uoo�,y' 15�43.-s�•-49�_��Z+ ,_ rnisc oarts 23.15 1',? ka R• 3 AuY,o Suoply� 1D1-4330-4��D-S�h rnisc p�r^ts 37_47 1:�_� &_,F__iiSLt.t! a�RR�.Y' — -.!r�-�.3�+-�22�=7�+_...�---- ----mi�.�rts__ _ 37.47 l 44 -- — -- -- ---------- -------------- ----- - 3� 1 . 71 _ Tc�tals Ternp Check Nurnber^ � ic TPrnr� C:hpck N�.�mber — — 1 3 •--- ------- •-- ------------- ---- - ----- ---Y-13 E; 3• 3 Auta Sccpply� ----� 01-433�-43Q+-5@ --��-- - ---niisc^{�ar•ts -� -- - - -- - ------- -------- ----------------------------- -----._.___ 33 ---Tota.l s _Ternt� E:heck _Ns�robel^ -- ------ - - 1� .. -- -- --- —.-- - -- --- ---_�� _.- .— --- -----.--- E. c� t � �; , i � Feb 139ui Clairns List . A � � :—F�^it _1:.1.8�.EM - - - ---_ Sit�y ��Mp_Yldtf�a_.H�a.917�4_ _. --I�m� f,J-reck_NsVOtiEY"' �.�3 - ---•---.- ----- Ci�eck ------ — -------------------- �NurnbEx�Jer,dur: tilarne- -- ----.__Accuur,t-f�rde.--�---_.,---_-__—•----•--�c�mrnet;ts--- �4_Ear�v�m�a.i.��ys�eu�.v_ r_�@,1_�3Zz.i��- `.--------_. _�1s�Y .SxF��-- Tc�tals Temp Check Number^ 14 Ternp Check Nurnber i SS � IS Rar^tcrr� Rschrn�n � �9-�r�t?�A-�OS-�� __ S �J �..._.____�_ "'._ "_ ` -SaL,als._.Iem�,..CYierlc__Nunitt�L --- 1�_----.------ .-- �LG'�nn_Check_.IJiimber_�_1£, _ ___�.,___� .._Sb _Piffs._Iric_---- li_.-�'��1!-E2�'+-.7d!-- 1E Bat`fs Srrr 01-4i?�@--CIO-••72t - —�—�--� � ke Rark ref -� ---�---- ---•--J�rl_��er��-- ----- FPb rent 3'? Tr,tals_5er�n_�hPck t�urnhet_ - 16 ------ -----._ __-- F`ane 3 f]ta4. ��21 1, 331r. 3'.=: 1 �34. ,7ii: s - 176. �+h 372. �� +_7-Boar�._uF-11a�er�cw�missic�ne� Q11-�+�i:1=31Q7=:_aid- ---- --_J3Y.iSY.C--- ?1. �F. ' 17 Roard c�7= Water Cornmissioners 58-44?5-0@0-��D ,3'an svr_ 25.?1 . • i7_.Duard�f-t,fa.t�:_S�mnu.ssiraners�al-1�^-5-325-37c._ — �i��fir�ssl�_arir.rl 9�. iT0 _ 17 R��ar�i of W�ter Camrrtzssianers �i-4425-31,:;•-3�Z+ Jan svc 79.c� —1.�Sc�at-c7��l�la�er rn.�.,,; _� a �.r�ers_��4r+:,�_�i +Z�7_�Z _—.Jar�sx� �+. 4S icta.ls Tern�:, Check Nurn6er 17 TPIRQ Cf-�eck Number- 18 � 18 � W Car^rner-cm 3� -4c:=�-84�-�Y.� -i fl•--•---- ----- --. ..- •--- - T.c.ka1�-T.ernp__Checic�laimber-------� 8_� --� �e Ruby Prive F3, ;=15. IDd S, � i S. �l� - T�rn}z._CFs�ck.-Nun�t�er 13�— � ---------- — - ---.i�-�3.ty-A'fc�tc�r Fit.t}1olj�--- tA1=6r33t3=k�-�D-'�ID-- ------. �.�frtisc_-nar_ts_ _ b?_ y i 19 C;ity Mr_�i;r_,�r gup��ly Y�1-43�:i-�S�Z+--S2+ rnisc par�i.S ��J.Ct} - �.i9__City_Mat-or S�tQp1�� --_12�1-1t33]Z�i431�1_:��d ------ misc_ner..ts-- ---- 2� 71 19 Gity hic�to�^ Supply 01-•433�D-4ErQ�-�0 rnisr_ parts 9.98 � `j_GS't)/-_.I�7G�.GL`-SLif]Ala[__ �Tl =1L3�iD-4�SZL=.31zt_`�_ __ n71SC_D3J_`:t5._ . 1 r �•� .l3 Caty hlotc�r ,:,upnly 1Z�1-433�h-440-2� rnisc pa�^L's 1r3.71 -.1�-�I'L"�V-I!iu�LGk:_.SUIIfIl-Y_.�"'"—__�.JD� fi33lai_4.�ID=3�[t._ _— .._��_-�_.�nisc�nax�is_;=;=L�------ 7?_ 9f-. 1'3 City i*fatai^ S�_�Roly 0i-43?�-4E,0-30 misc- parts 14.46 —.--_.13 City-Mutc�r�__Sunoly-----••--------�D1-433�-4.4ID-:3�..-------.---..._._ _��Jnisc_Dar_ts__.^----------------i� £�@-.---- .-- 13 Gzt•y �+ic�tc.a.• F3��n{-�ly Y�1--�433�-•44:.,-•40 rnxsc parts 4F�.'T:� f ^J � Peb 199� � _�'ri_,�L:_18_FM�__,__.� �,l;J� --T NytF-- CF� et; k_ N i�rn bPr ---._- ----1 '� _ Clairns List __—__��ii: y__cf__f+Lend�� a_ Hei Fage 4 � _ � --�PL�''— ---- - --'------..�------ -- - �� Check —.Nsvnher _Ver,dor^_Narne----.--,•-----._,.-�.---.Acc��sir�t._�c•de_ _^__�__�_—�-.�c�nmer�ts�e_ &nir.ur�t —� '� ----1� Cit�! Mots�r it.tPPl.y�,----��!�1�.4�35±_�4�,��.4@-----_ -------•- �aisr _par_�_ . _3-__A�_ 19 City Mc.tar^ Siinp].y +h1--4?3L�-49�-5� misc parts 1�7.30 '-'� 'c'1=8 � ------- ---.— --- — 41b.13 ---_.��=c��.s JPfnp_�he��l�isunbs!^-------19�_-- -------- ------ ----- -- ' } Prnp CI�ec35_NuLnber;�^--.��Z+--- - ---- ------ ------ ��T �� y M�ar SSLPD-J.Y---- 3��-��-ti1L�-s?1�. mi��r.�.s ak_ as 2�2+ City Matcr Si�poly 01-4330--490-50 rnisc c,arts 20.��2+ �Vi_City Mutar� SuPP�,Y _----- --��=43r.�fi-44�=i'-�?�_�.��------�_._rII�S�-Aar��-- - �1g .�i �� City Matc.r Supply �1-43�5-ID.�0-50 rnisr_ ��rts �8.3� __._f�7+ i'3ty_.1'�ot�7��ttP.P1Y _ _ Lna=4.;1�.5=�Z!7.�=7i�__ _�_ misc .p.�iY`�5 i=H._�� 2V.i City Motor S�ipply 01-4330-440-�?� rnisc parts 7:.,.1'2 120 - ^ 2@5.31 Tot a 1 s Temp Check Ni�mber _____,_ c0 __ _� __ _ � � 21 City oF W St Rau2 15-433a-430-60 swr^ interceotc�r rntcn 645.0Q+ ` ' 21 City c+f W St Raul 01-2012+ recycling C,c�c�dwill 5�1.25 42 ^ ~ ^ � 1 , 237. 25 Tatals Ternp Eheck Nurnber- c^1 _ � Temo Check Number 22 «_C��_k�x��r�c�.L�c�r.c�� !71�k��..��.c_J@ �h�s�L�es Pa�-ks �' �s Tatals Temp Check Number Ternp L'Y,eck Nurnber- :'3 �3 Cc,rnrn Center 22 0] -43:.i�-44i7�-c^� rprs JJ. S�� i3 JJ. fD� To��,is Tern�_C�-ieck hl�ifnbei^ '�3 ,_ _Telrrp Check_N��rnbe�=-- -�4 - — �___� +-r+--G�'RY_DuP� ics�t�a..�4_F.>_��dLtc�� ?�� 4! y�?�;a+T �� — 3an c,r_� - •-c,9_�__.._------------ --- ------------ ------- Tt�tals Ternp Check Nurnbei^ ;=4 Sernp Check Nurnher� ::5 --------- -- - - - --�• ------------ -- -- --- --- ------------ -- � S Crawfc�r^d [Yaar• �1 -y3�5-3] �-,:,N c';7 Tota_�s_Temp_Check. Num6er___._- �`'------------------ ------- ---dc.c.r� r^pt^s 13�,�. 75 13�. 7� .� � � 3 �_ _ � . . 8 Feb 19�+2� Claims L.is�t Fage 5 -# � -Fsci_..1�18..�6'M- --- ---- -�i�_y__c��Mer�r�ot�d_Heigb�s�------------------- - � T rpp._Cb�cJt�leamber 'E,- - - ----.----- ---------_-- --- wT,etnp_ _'-�' ___� - _'_� ____-_-"�""__"".��__.-___ .� �heck -N�u��ber-- Vendar__.Narrte�-_�_._�_______.__.Rccc.unt_Cud�_^_.___.�__. __ __ __��.._.Cornrnents_.________._.__. —HIIl�sct�_-_- � --_-;36__Dakc�ta�c�ur,t.y_�harnbPr .nr .C.crnrn__'��i<<r_43s=1Z++Z��i��_�---�._ .1991Z#_.dir_ectcrries,_ _ ��a-k'�s 26 Dakata Cnunty Charnher c�F Cc�mrn �1-44�0-i1¢+-1� rncrrrthly rntg il.�� ---__- - ------- ----- -----_---------_----- ----- .�3 5�= 511. ��2� --T�atals,7�,�p_.Chn�k�lsunbe�^ _�__.E6 `_------____---.�`.-- ------- — .- .� -�'.ernp._�hec}t�Jiirnber �7 -----.��- ------•--- ------------ - -- � --.��_Daka.ta._.C,aur.ty_,Flovy I2en�-_._".�i.-.4'�li_3.@�L,S��---- ------�-city sbar`.t.i's3£��113r�:1s _. 3$�.99 _ P _._ -----��7.-----�.��_----- ------- ----•----._�_.�._ -_-_--- . ��--- -- - -• --- -------- — - 38�=9� Totals Temp CF�eck Nurnber '?7 , j Ternp Check Nurnber -- `�------------------------._._-----------------_�,------- -• - - T Y .'_'8 Aakc�ta Caunty Treas^---�-�^ 14-•4490-��-�Pa-----'---�--�---�--- prc�J 1D1p1` forms4 4 9�.c:Q+ ----- --- :-r�_Dakn�a_Cnuni;_�Tr�a�.----- ��.4�)L5S}1.5=I.�-- --�_�.�om�2.��^��2t��.��5 259.50 -_ ----•-•-- � =F. _ 3G4. 7S� ----- r -- — ---.�.«•�---- — ------•—^------------. .Y..._��—•----- — o Tatals Ternp Check l3urnber � 8 ° - - — --�- - ------- `� ` 'i'emp Check Nur,iber :'9 ,^_9 Sarnes Danielsarr �S-44i5-1�5-i:� �" Feb allawar,ce 1'�'.0. rL@ �}� -- ------- ----- - ._._A__..___----- --------. ------ � 2`3 icLT. �Qs . --:�atals-Tcmp�tae�)t._.btumber-_- ."� -- --- -----------,--.__�.�.-- -- - %� --T.am�.-Checzk-.hlurnbex--_ -3Q+�- •-------- ------- -----•---- - - - - . � __'—�1Z��—DEY�Ya2S—DB1fAGY��.—'—'----- sTi---!<<!�J_iZ��tDc��D.----.------�- �f?EY�_allawarice�----- _�'rJ�.�37�� 3� Dermis D�lrnont 01-441�-�2�-20 expense reimb 56.�Y� -•------ } 60 ----- ------ - �._.�.- --------- ----- -- 17F7. �� — -3'aL•als_TernQ__Cheok_.hLurnber�-_ 3�-_r----------------�_�------- _ �_. __. �------- . � -�emta--Check--�fumbe�^----------31--------------� ------------------ --•-- -- ----•-------- --- ---�-�]-R�.ber-t-.G-Tde�a--l�ev-3-r,e------_-�'�r-�_.�xi -._-��_., -_--�.f.ci._eiepusit strn._swr=ex� _ �t�ia_�0_-- - � _-.__._.37.�.--- ---- ------ -- -----------�--------� 5��._@�-__—_`�.-_� 1'cL-als Ternn CY'eck hfurnber 31 , Femo Check Nurnber- ` 3;= 3;: Fire W�tch--- ------ �1-4;3�-44V.�-^c@ �------rEchar-ne .-A-. -- 41.SID ----.-^ ------------ -•---- �----- -----__....------- 3c ---•---�------•-------..�_....--- ---- ---- -_-._---- 41. SID -- -�_Tc.L-als_Ten�n.Check 1Vurnbe�^ -- --� - ----3t ---� ._.----- _ ------ ---�-� - ---------•- --_._ .---- -•------ --------- -- --- _ �Fernp i.;�eck _ Nun�ber - -- -- . . _ ..� - . _ .._ _ _.------- ---- -- ---- - �- - -- ---• - . � ... -- �-- ---------- --- --- -�--�--- - •- --3� Fir�e-f�7ar^sY�all-fissn-oF•-MN-------�Z+1-44�4-a2+3V_!-3:h-----------------•--1J3� Ct1.IP_S_'""_'_."_"'_�___'_ '�1%�__IZIQI—_—.__��—_ ' _� . 2 Feb 199�. � r,� __F_r_i_,�:-IH�FM-----_--. �.r� _�_.I.emp_ ChQck _Numbe�^._ Temp.---- ---- Cher_k --��furnber�_ Ver,rlcv: Name Cl�ims List • --•------�.�-----Gity__o'F_.Menduta__Hei�h.�s-- ---- ._ --��3------------------------ --------------•----------- --. - -------�� _ __ Ficcc, unt�ode _.._��_�- ----------�amment s--- Fage 5 ---'33 �__.�.--•_------------------------------_._------ --�---�-`------- ----- - :=Q+.�+O ,_� 'rc�tals �?'erna_Cf�eck.JvunybEr ----33 ---- ---- - _�em D_ Ch.ec k. _ N u rnber-- --- ---? 4 _ _. _- .---•------- - --- -� - -- --- ------- �-•------------ -- - -- - -- � �4_£_._D_A.�et�R----- ------�_�Zt1=1.211��_ �__�.�_-----�'11--- - - - a-''=m0 --"'-�---------- - - - 93_ tn� � Tat-als "iemp tyher_k Nc�r,�b�r 34 Tema t;heck Nurnher �� --- - - J J -----•--------•----- - -- _. �------------------------- ------- - � 3:. �er�er•al Cor,imunica�tior;s �1-•433Q�-44Q-•8�b u 7-adir.� r�pr^s 5�r.�7+�Z+ 35 Gene�^al Cornmui�icaL-5ans ._. __�Z+1-433�-45ID-3� ra¢�c� rors 54.Fz�. ? 35 Ger�er-�1 Cornrnunicati��ns f1�2-4330-•45S-3rD radia r^prs 27.30 S tZ�S ._.. _.�_ __ -_� . _-_-___ "-"-' _-__. ___.- _ .I F J. 91Ci % _ ToL-ais.7Prnra Check Numb�r 35 i _.-�---- -- - ' , � TPIItD Check_Nurnber 36 ___ _ _ )g 'z �3E Goc�dyear=,Ser_v_ice Stc�re----- ¢+1-43��44�-�'ui---•-_ -.- tirPs-==�r_�-- 1c^5. y�r -- ------ 'i$ �6 i:?5. i34 • Tc�ta2s Tern� CF�eck Ni�rnber 36 - �� FPmp ChPck Na<rnber 37 37 NBYiriPplYi Technical Coller.�e tZ�1-440�Z+-1:,�-.-',� RP_Oi' K315E7` %J� Q�1Z� __ .-i% ` � %J. 1%�QI T_�!�.al s_T�rnp�.ecl�Lurnh��^ _�_7 ' -�'�mF�he�k.N_uu�b�a�-----'�--------------------- --- - s 8�e�wr_F1ar�}�- --._�1.1=4te�i.�Z,1�-,�� mi sr ��P1Ys 4. �9 3D Hdwe }iank �Z+1-•43�T5-�72+•-T0 rnisc splys , 38.34 ��l.�ct��_.N�rtk-- -,_ �i.-43tis��7V�-7a- ---. - �n��_�o� y�_ _ 11. 58 �- i:1k--- ------- - ---- ----. -._�•------------�---• -- 54_ 31 _�- 7atais 'TErnp Cf-�eck (Vurnbei^ 3b , 7ernp Check N�irnber-- �`] --- ------•• ------------- --- 39 Hc�lrnes aG �Y`EiVBYi — —_'_"_ —�1—'titl47i'�"4��Q+-:.'� --------------•- 1994.� subs �----• 4E1. t?��h ----- ------- ---------.�.-�---------------- -------- -- ----_-_---------_-----T._._-..----------•--- ------- -- 39 48. 0� ------._Tc.tals TemA.Check.Ni�rnber------ �..39..---------.____�. .----------�-.----�--�..-----_.�--.---------- - -- .__._ Tetnp Cr�eck tr'urnb�r_--- -.-- .--- _4i, - -----_ --- -- ---- - - - -- ------4td.S C1...S.-•-------------- - ----_id1=.i:��.Q�.-•- --- --- --._.._-__. _------ I«.7nc�Li �c�R3.P.t,---------�.�.�_�bt��.� --------- i ' 2 Feb i99a Claims List � -_�xi_i.:1E..P.t+f-- -- -----� _�Ci.iy_.cf_ Nler,dc�ta Hei.gh.�s----- _SErnn_CYx�clt Nurnber� ,_.4Q! -----------.—.,_--•. -.-------- --- ---•---- T27A{��___.'_ .—___ ____—_�.__�.._._�—_.__. ._.__.��.._ Check Fage 7 � --Nt�rnber=._uenr�ar..__fVarne,------ ---------- -•----A.ccaunt_Cude-----. __._. .._._.---.----.Cnrnrner.,ts----•-------.-------- —gmCttr'il� — ^ _4U�-�.-Q-E ---��.�1=L�S.Qt_...-----___.._..--------- ----�_ ._edi t__ bc�ar.d --•-- --- 436 V+�T -- -._ �.f30--- ------- - ----- ----- - -�------ - ---- --------- t l-s.�� . �� _ 7'c�tals Temo Check Nurnber^ 4ID Ternp Check Nurober ----�41 ^�-------�--�-^------ Y-------- 41 S CMA ---- - --01-4404-1 1 V�-1 �.'� ii ----- ------ 41 -- --- -- ------ -----------__------ — � Tatals_3ernp_Ctxeck__Nun�be�^---_. _�_ 4i _�_.� _-- .-------.--.�...,__ 7 Check J�I� rnber 1r^ 1�9�n dues batchelde!r -- �m{�_ - � --- - �•-•----- --- --- - -- •--• --- - - -._.._..---- --------�---•---- - — - _�r,�.S_.0 Nt_.A___R T.----- -----�Ztly07'�-...r_...___.�.__._.__-----------1/.;=3_nay.7-��11�_--- ----_1L��,9._._---•-- 42 I C M A R T �i-4134-I1�-IIU 1/29 payrall &4.44 — �4------- --- --- - -- ------ - -------•---- �E;.,.3� T�a]s_7'ernn._Clzeck�JurnbEr=-- -�� - ----_.,__.�__..___.._��.----------------------_.�_ --- �.� Rau].__1{aisAr=— -----�----�DY-H�6&_35�t=3tD-----•---------�ar.�su�_ , � --1.1..�Z+--IZ'n — 43 Fai�l Kaiser +DI-�441:�-•�3�--3�T+ Jan rnileaoe 39.ct3 8E� � -------- - --�------ _ --_.------�.-____..__------ i T 149. �6 T�ta1s_.7erna_�ti�r.t� n�Lunber- --�3 --•----- -------- -- - - — r>ta�s-�heck._fitumher �_ 4�- - ----------------- -------- - �r4_Kx�ax�L.�un6er_--��— + 6=�3ID=lalZ�fa-V�sa---------.------ ---,----._ ,mi sc..snivs_ _ �9.. '�-�.._t't -_._ 44 Knox Lurnber 01-43>D.:r-SSS�-5� rnisc splys 8.99 f3La_..-- - --- -- ---------------------•--•--- 67.23 -- _—�.c�tals_2e1,w_.C1�e�.k_Nwnt,ai=-.--- - 44__ _.��._� _--_----•--.Y._v__.._�_.__-.------ - - �_em{s._Ct�eclt_Nurnber_-�-----�_45�---------- •-----•-------------------------- ---�--- -- -- -lr5 Tbamas_Y.rsuth.�------- '�c=4bL�6ID-60_------. �,----mileana--- �3._E8— 45 Thomas K�outh Q�9-44i5-•a0�-•�� ntileage 42.64 —.--k5 Tharrtas.�{zruth------ �DS-�r.�i5-1�D3=15._--- --- -------mi 1 ea na ---- -- � �'�i-------- - 4�, Thc�r�as i{nuL-h NS-441:�-1�.:r-IS F�eb allowar�ce SS�.�N � It]�T. -. �.-- --- ------ -------------�-------------------- 7,3.92 ^T- -- �'rs�.als_7emn_Ct�eclt�lVumber_-�_ _�:�.. - ------ -_ —_.�---------- -- —Tlrno__Check_Number.----- ---.._46 ----- ------------------_..------•- -•------- ------- 46_SCremer-- Sprinn._&_Alinr�A_ .�..__.ID3_=4330-49@cS�L! _,_--�----- -- -..r�nr•s-�1�4--- -•----_._..-------_4�?��±�--- -------- 46 ---- --- -" --- - ---- �— -------- 4��a-`�,�-- ----- - --" Tc�tals Tern� Check Nurnber------ - ----" 46 ------ ---- - ---- --- -- s i � Feb 1990 " Clairns List �age 8 • • �.�. __.Fr.i,_ i.:19�Ps'1�---•------ -��£i�y.--efJlend��aJ-leiub.ti�_ ----•----- --- � � _ T�rrtp ChPck Nt�mber------ ��•------------•---- ------------•------ - Terno. -� flieck ------- - Nurnbe�. Ver�dcg_ Nnrne �-- --.A!>��4�YL'fc_CiL=l�F'.------------ S�L7GLYi'kS_----- ---- Firnc,�irrt d �' _ 47!-,. F:_� _��__ _. i!1=2�7..��. .—_------- ---�.�tZd!,tes_,� — iga.mm -- - 4? i �1�. r.TS� �'j Tc�tals Terno Check Nu�nber 47 Tem�s CI-�eck N��mber 4t3 4�1 L M C I T HP +TS-:��74 Feb �rern 5�7.9:r A.t3�i.._b.__��T HD +D 1-4,��.�4Z��.�_.�� F.�t£�1^�L— 67?. 63 --- 96---- ----- --•------ - i� as. 58 �-- Tatals Terno Check Number -- 4fs -------•--------------------y-- -•--------- -- Tenio Check Nurnbe�^ 49 ,. 49 Larsc�n Suhurbai•� �r�eenh��use �1-449�-110-1� Xrnas t.ree C N iBS.O+Z� ' 43 --- --- - -- . ----��.r--- ] 65. ��P Tat• a 1 s Ten� Check Numter 49 ___� _i______�_ Tern�] Check Nurnber- �rID _ i_ Sl?� M�'_hc.tna� !_awel ] �i-4415-11�-1t2� _ _. FPFi a.l l��wance i75. �Z+O � ��T Y 7�: �T�T Tc�tials Ternp Check Nc�rnber 50 Temn Check Nurnber 51 51 Leef Br��s �7:-43�J-3S��:1� 3an svc 9.70 51 1_eeF £�rcfs �1-433:;-31�-•7'a Ja�� svc 9.6:� SI LeeF Pras 15-4�35-31�-E0 Jatt svc 9.65 S 5? � 3. Q�� Tc�tajs T��iiQ CJ,�gFFs Ni.��i-��r _=r1 _ _ �e�i��Y�.eck_ _S;? rJ�_AGScti�ltPS __@L-�%t,�.iQ�.:i_@�1Z _� � _ m; �_�so1y5 S��_ t�5 52 M f� Rssor_iates ¢�1-43�5--�h7iZ+-7�T+ rnisc splys JJ.G�J _ �:�.�LLA_A_sscci.�3�P.� _�__1.:c�4��.fzP_Fzl7� �__�e3�cvsz7,�s _ 55.3+h i �.6 1 E�. 9� Tc.t a 1 s Tern�-i Check Nurnber 52 ` Tema ChPck Nurnber 53 ----- .53 Med Centers H F --- --- �1-_V.+74 �-------------------- Feb !7t'PfA---_—' �.q SGS. ]� �_��:13_14ed_.CP»ters_.�}-P -----•--�_..�+1_�131-11�=1.7�-----------------.-f-�b_nrern------- 1.118..�_� w;3 f+ied Centers H� +7.i1-413i-�c:Q+-•�:�h Feb orern ',_', 1ST7_ 3� .� � -; ^ - - -- - __ � ' 2 F�b 1�90 Clairns List • F'ane 9 ' a � _F��i_�._i:.]E..FM--- - - ----------_€".�t.y._c,f_I{l�nrJsSta_HP-;S��ht� ` y � �SernF C11sck_N!trn�ei^ -. �,3 ----- -------.--_-._-_-- ------------- - Terrt�'. - -- -_-_- -- ------ ---- -- - --------------- ----------- � Cher_k -Niunber__Vendar�_Narne-�----�---_---_--Accaxir.t_.Cocle _--- --,- - --•_- --_-_---- ._Carnrnan�s- -. �'jGu.c.�.tYi•L ---._ _..__..-� ' � _�,:,3,_Med_�ei,ter.�H�- -- ---12�1=4131=�Q?4�-•4�------ -------------Feb_�r_em------------- 450.Q+� S3 Mled Cent•ers H P 2�S-1r131-�50-S�Z� Feb nrem �.:,7.05 ----�3�Jed_Cer,t�r.s-H-�'- ----�_JZ�1.��41�1-_lL+7 +l�-✓��_ _�._- ,�eh�p�^ern ---- - 4�2+4.__jz+r�- - '� :�3 rled Centers H P tZ�S-4131-1i?�5-iS Feb pr-ern 779.6+Z� _53_Med_�Qnters._H_F _.�_�f�_4.3��,_iT@!Z�-•�� --------------.--F_eb__P.C��----------- iV�4. ID -- 53 Med Centers H�' 15-41?].-OE�-E� Feh prc_rn 404.50 '�) i 47T ----- -- - - ---------- - - -- 7, A84. 4� _ 3�tals_Te�i�a_L.hEr.k_.fliviihei^ __-�3_ _._.--.-•----------- ----- -- i -S.emn._CY�eck_.Numbel=----''4----- ----�..------------ ---._..__.__�.__.._.�-------------•--------- --- - . � �4--l�letal-f9inders . _�_OL--�RIitZ�.------------- -• --•,---------.__Hcae_.1^.3cks__..------ --. 1� 44+T. iT�h -----�'� ------ -- --.�—�.– ------- - ._. ...�_•------------_---- ------ •----- --��' .V�•�i!�_---- � 1 Tctals Temp Check Number 54 Ternn Cher_k Number �,:; ' 1 -- --- -- • ------------ - - ------�------- ---'------- - - o y SS 1+fetr�v 5ysterns' �1-2ibiV.i ofPice Furr�iture 1, 763_ 4f., °_ __ ---- -- - -.- -------- ' r�� 55 1� 7F 3,. 46 - 7utals._Temp_.Ck�eckJ�iumi�er _�-:.,� -•---•- - -------- --- -- - 1; TornD—Cf7.2.CiLi1�.Ufi7j7EJ-_� _�ti3—.`—. �—_ __�'_.'—_ _ —� . 5£-I+1eta£i1�_.Tx,.Fc�Sjrsi�ms- --ID:,-'�.idJ.ta �-------.-� me�aF_i1e_s3!st.ern bq5_ v�eT ;�i� �6 --- --- --- ------------ ---_-_-._ 4A�_�i1d_ _ 7oL-a2s Ternp Cf-�eck Num6er �G } TernA t�heck Nc�rnbe> 57 ----�------u -�•-------^- - ---- - - . ; 57 Metra WastP Ccmtr^c.l � iS-4449-�6�-F0 � Feb chgs �A � ?�, �:��:. 74 _:,7-l±letr_c�_WastE_Car.,�r.al-----..��7_-•3S7S--------•---�-�___ .F_etz_.chns.----------- ?s�tz=�&cJ^ - .. s �_y_ .- ----------------- ----------- --�.�------•-- ------- -_-••--� -i1T.�9��_.fi. Tc.tals Tem�i Cher.k Nurnher 57 - ---------...--- ---- --- - � � Ternp Check Nurnber St3 �£j Mid f=+merir_an L f.1 Cc� �TS-4cii?�-�Z+�'4'1-:=N � lri ca13s ' 14.44 � .�8 -------- - _ ----------- •- ------ ----- 14.44 -Tc.L-als_.J-ern��heck�lurnber --Sb ----- - -------- -�Brrtn_.C1�eck_-Nurnber^--- ��----- �-------------�-------------------------- -�_, 59. T7idwest _Phata_Svc.__�___.-. -_---- 01-1r431d-Q�ciD-�?�L�---__-------- ----_._. 3an, svc-----. ----------- 1�E..7.��_. _--- ---- - - •- ---- ----------- - ------ -•- �3 - - - ----- -- -_ _ . - ---- •--- ---------- -- ---- - – ---- — ----. �� _7? �� T��tals Ternp Check Nurnb�r 53 � � Feb 199� Clairns List r., -1ri,1:..iB sPNL.---r�.--------- Ei�_v__e�.Me�d.c,t�}9eigh��---------- � _S��u�i GheF'lL.N_i¢nb�>�---------E'V� --•----•--------------- CF�eck —Nsrmbe>:_Yendt�r _tVaro�__. �_�_ �s�aSlTii__CS?1iP--_�--�.—._...------.�__��=�filmPrt�r.------- P�oe 1� "� 3 6a.M.i11e�F_r.i.r.�t_i�ig--------�,1�43�!S�-.i1�!=1�_�.�._.__-.--.��_�sisi.r.�ess..r.�r_�1� _ __—�b;�.� _ -•- --•---- �, h�—'-_ __'_ �'___� ___ 16J.1b0 r Tc,tals Temp L:heck Nurnber 6�.T Ternp Cher_k Nurnber^------ G1 --- --------_ _-------------------------- --- — � fi1. Mlirm Cellular Tele Co 01-4�Q�S�-�I�-t?0 � i ��Jan svc � 13. 10 GJ._r?�n�:r Ggi ls�z:�r_2..Pie s__ �1-�r•� + +-�.6�m-2m _.E�r.c_�� _ w_ �� —^_.1.;'4------�---- ---�---- -----------------------------_ ..__---------• 1�'�'S --- Tc�t•als Temp £:heck Ni�rnber, 61 ' Tern{� Check tJurnber 6'?_ 62 Minn Mutual Life Ins +2�i-2@74 Feb prem c^�.40 6:= Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-•4131-02�h-•c0 Feh orem 5.1� 6:: Mi nn Mait ua 1 Li �Fe ins �1-4I31-S72�-7ti? ! FPh nrem �� i_ 7� j 18E — — -- — ---- --------- 27. � +� Tatals Ten� Cf-ieck Number 6c _ E,3_M_irlr�p.�s�ta Rerlef� Ass» Oi]`.2074 _ �__ F�t��rern ''.'.',?.74 63 Mirn�es��ta Penerit Ass�, 5�1-4131-1i�-•12+ Feb prern 122.55 �3 MSn�esc.ta Renefit. Assr� �TS-4131-1V.�S-1.:� _ Feb Drem " 371?�.c:0 ' Ea3 Mirn,esc�ta ReneFit Assn �1-413I-•S�2u-2� Feb Qrern 946.93 ' E3 Mirn•,esata R2YiBF7.'t Assn _ �1-4131-SSID=�iO __ ___ FeU prern 1�8.84 63 Mi rmesat � Penef i t Fassn � Q11-4131-�7�h-70 Fetr prern 94. 49 E3 Minr�esota Benef#t Assn 1�-4y.�7.--�6�T•-6� Feb orem SYJ.JC Tat�ls Temp Ct-reck Number Fernp Check Nurntrer Er4 64 Minn Fire F�gencies 63 +2� 1-44�4-�30-,3N --- �� ----- ---- -- ------ — __��xa2� ,Temq Check �J�snbeY' -- f'-tt---------•-- ---- Ten�__Check Ncirnt�er_��_E,S __ � __ ,_ 199�Z+ dues .3:�. �4?� rz;�_M�.nr,esg�.a�r.pway-----------.��.,.4�vs-s;%Q�_��- -----------bc�c�ts_�_ i8. ^c7 bS Mini.esota C�nway SI-43�5-Q+3Q+-3� splys 14�.N� --- 13h_.-.---- --------------- ------------ -- --- — - �•-------------- ----- '� 1 i3. :?7 �- �.---Tctais_TPutA_Chcti[,k__NurnbPr---.------E'�— ---------_,. l-.---------•------- - __�arna_ Cl�eck IVumber-------.-- --6�,-- --- -----------.---- - - � __.�_ .�.__._._.� _T_�E,E ri..5 S-R--_._---------------•-.!b1.��4_t?�;.LV.!-5�---- ------•---..�_i'-�.�?X� d�s _ ' --- - ----- ----- --- ------- `� •,� p�� g9rh Claims List ,�age 11 - � ;, � —�r.i..----1:18�,FJ+1.... ------ ---------._Ci_�Y--eF_SdPttdG'�a__Nex9h�S�------•----- - ' . - � � S —.2r_rn�_.Chack_Ns�mb�r------�'�'--------------------------- --�---------•------ ��ernP------ --- --------- -- -- ---- -------- -------- ChPck .—Nur,Tber_Venda:-_Narne�---__�__.----------- - Rcc.aur•rt_Cc�de�-- --- - - ------Ccn�rne�its.�.-,---..-------- Amc�unt --- - -- - � -----==-------- ----------•-----•------------ -- --------- ------_.�.�------- - EF �'-0. �a ----S.utals_ Yem� �t�eck.�IVurnl�er -----_._6EL.__.__�.___��___.._.—�- --------- — �' ---Ser�To�heck_Nurnher -------6`Z----..��._.__.�--------- --..�_._--_.._— _--------•- — -- � h - --&7_�'�7n_D�u�-F_ubli��a.£.ety. __.@i�4'c:��L61iT-.;_N�----`_�__.--------as�rari__cb:g---- -- 15�.0a 67 M�� I'iept P�.�bl ic SaFety �1-•42C��-61�h-� 0 corm chn 9�• �� • � ---- 134+------•------ --------_..__��.-�--------------------------------- --- 240.Q++T �^_. Sc.��a1s_Iemn __Chach_ Nurntier- ----._ . ___.E.Z - -� -- ---- - -- --- - -- - ----- - — ----- -- -�-�------------- --- � —r_em��heck.Number ----�6t3.-----,--.---.__------.--._._.._�_.-.--------_.----.—_--- --- ...-5&_Idcuotc�:, 7'hc�k��l.-.-------------57.-44;_1..-.�::,�-.Sd+__------------_...___._.saPe._t�_sa2t_--------- 60$-.,^�__ } 60t2�. 2� c'8---- - -- — ---• ----- ----------.��__ _ Fata 1 S Ternp Check Nt�ntber 68 � — � — ---------------.- ._...�--- --- �---------� ---•---'•----- - - -- o � Ternp Check Ncartbe>^ � b9 -- ----- ---��.----- -`�— _— !c 69 Mc.tc�r��la dil-43��-4`=Si-•�it� radia r�r,r^s 9'c�. �� - --__b9. _fnatr�r_c.la- --- -----a.1-4.33�-45�L+�� ------ -------r.adi c��=nr�----- i � ;. 5� " --- ------- � i _�_13fi._----------- ------------ `�_._�---- --------------------- 256_ t2��?1 _ Totals Sernn Check Nurnber� �9 � -__---- --------T_�- ------ -- --- --------� ---- � 3 � Temn Eheck Nurnber 70 7Q+ N�tl Carnouter $ystern �-----�i-�a4�h�T-ITc�Z�-:=V_� -_---------- i m��------ iw.t�s � 7.V.e-.Nat=1-�crnpu�er S�stero-_ �___�i-4_4�D0-��dc�D-��D.�----------------- ��nrs_------ �F._s�h - +-�t1d-��- —•------------------------------ --------- — �9_ tT� � � 7c�tals Temp Check Numbei- 70 Ternp Check IVe.tmber --- 71 -.^ -^ --- '--'^-- l 71 fJca�thern State F�c�wer^�.--^-. '�9-4211-��Q+-Q+0 "-----'- �-------Jan svc -i------ - E01. 33 �_�7-1.-.AJc.�*-khar-iF Stats_Rc�wei^--'__'--_'1AC3—,�F'�ii-.fhfTQ�=JZ11Z�-.._�_^'___ _�S.3YISVC '�ta�_�� 71 Norther�r•� 5tate F��wer� i5-4'.=�11-4��-E,0 Jan svc 6?.93 ->+__t�for--�trer-i�--Stake.��aw�r --- --�ZiL-!i212=•315_3�D_---- ��_ �_.Fel�svc____._� _.:cL4- �'�a ---. _ 71 1Vc.r-thern State Pawer 01-•4� 12-3. �h-7� Fet� svc 111.�a 71_iVr,�^i1-iern-Sxa�e_Fr�we.�.--------�DO-4�1'`-:taiDtZi3�t�---.- --------F.,ebsvcY. ----.--- ��c.. 14 -- — 71 fVar-ther-n Staie F'c�wer tZ�9-4cii-+��Z++Z�-S� Feb svc 716_Q�6 ?�Narttsexx�_State�.ower ---._.taS-_4�211:3�td-70----- --- -.Feb_svr --- 2EE1_�s 71 Nor^ther�r� State F'c�wr_r^ iS-4;:Ij-4�Q+-F,0 Feb svc: 29.9:: 6�9- ------- --------�------------------------- ---- ------------- _-- �, 75�2+. 10 -----'�otals �"Prno .CYieck_t3urnber__--•--- -.- 71 --___..--- --_- ---------- --.------ .•----- -.------•---------- — — --- _—Terrtt�- Ck�erk Number-.- - -- ----T,_ - - - - - -- ------ - •- - -- -- ----- ------ ---- --- -- - - --------------� •----- ---- --- - --7;3�_Nc,r^'r•her>n._R-gr'--C�'}'�'- ------- - �R=�33:�-�'��Y.t-v»_� __ -_._�__—__�-_—_a^.nr.-s �- --------.�.__-- � ��-Z�-- -- — - 2 Feb ]99� Claims 1_ist �*-+„�1,:1E�F_M--,— —� --•Ci.ty._ccf__S1er�d�:ta_Hei.ghts � _�entt�l�h er.}�N+aro bP1^ P�ge 12 ;"; ►_�1 _ T�tan _ - — -- - — �' Check _Nsm�ber._l!end.er_�aru�----------------Bccu.trit�C.��de------------____.G.crnmerl�s___.� ----� —�ra�.s.tr�.Y�_- - -- - -� 72 '-- — - --- --- ---__ - `--- --------•--- 1 � �. 75 ^ _�s�.��1 s _In_r�P_�hPrk�lswtttEr `--7_�� ----------- --- .� 3 _��ra.tL�he.c.k_1�1!.unb�r ---��—�_�.------------- 73_N�rthwes�t cnaPtP>� FRINAA _lTi-�V�lt_11!�-;`u! ---•--- Y99� c�.tdes _� :��.$�_-- ic�tals FPmp Check Numtaer 73 Ternp Check Nurnber -.-- --;74--------•------�----• --------• ----�-.�__ 74 Oakcr^e.st Kenne]s �1-42c^1-Li0�A-•3� 74 O�kc�^est Ker�i,els SS-4c:.=5-8�7»h-90 Tc�tals Ternp Check Nu�nber 74 Ternp Check N�.�rnber 75 .7an svc 8��. a0 75 Oxygen Se>^vice Cc� Q�1-430.:,-�3�-3V.i cyl ar_t 7. �� 75 L1Xyge�, .�'-�ervice Cc� __. ._ SS-4335-•�htTO•-0ID v_��_ ^ cy1 aci __ �_ I3.5� 1 7S Dxygen Ser-vice Ca +2�i-430��-�35�-3� cyl act 9. �7JOJ , �ii- J — — ax �a Fatals Terno Check N��rnber 75 Terno ChPck Nurnber 76 ; F �} g ;c i �. I 76 Rc�acS Resr_uP �1-463�-�T3Q+-30 speaker/si.rer� 94.'�8.2� 76 Road RPSCLIP 01--4305-030-3�Z+ rni sc spl ys 63. 0�2+ 75 Fc,ad Rescue �1-4330-442+-: N rors 2;='5.56 ' 76 Road Resr_ue �1-43Q�5-03N-30� niisc splys :�4.4� 3a4 ----- -- — -- ---- 1 T 251 . 21 Tatals T€LR Check Numher 76 _ _ TemR Check Nurnber 77 `_ , __ _ _, 77_�_&_2_Df_:Eic�_E'rsr�isi��r—�.---�.1.�,�.�@v�_�:?¢±-;'_� -- --------r�,xs��nn�.Ys -- s.^_.7v� 77 S 8• 7 QfFice F`raducis �5-43��Z+-1�5-•15 misc splys 9Ei.25 _,77 S�;T Offa�ce F'r_c�clticts _ ^__tZ�l _430V�_ tZ��=�=�___ __ __ rni sr splys _._ _ ID_ 41 _ 77 a ft� F Office �`roducts �J—'11.3��I�J—SJ misc splys 20.1+A 77__S_� T-Ui�ir.e�r��iuc�s_.__.__—�..s�S�.��=.1.05-15._ � __,_.lftisr SP.7.Ys_._._ c^5.33 _ "_'.�L�,J"__ _' _'�'�.____'___ Tatals Ternn Gheck tJuniber Temn Eheck Nurnber^ i� 78 +------79 Sar�itary Pr•oducts Cc�--- .--. _77 _'_"'__' _'�'___"'��_""'—._._"�_�"'_".� - ----- - - -- ----, ---•----__.�.._--------- - --�---- - - --- IJ—t}��J—..7i1�-E�� rnisc sA1ys 4 3. 24 �� --_ �� 2 Fah I990 QF*-i,_..1�-iQr_�`NL----------- ��"�rnp_Check_Numbe.r.__�_ 7 Claims List -- �i. t y.. c� f�f9pnd c±t a.�e - .�age 13_ Temp-----------•-----•-------------`-- ------------- ----- — .''�` Check --N.urnber._Vendar_.Name- -•-•----------.----.Accaunb. Cc�de--- - ---.----.--.-----.--_.C.omments -._.---- Rrngyy-�t _ :� . 79.Sa��ixar_y_fiiroducts__Ca.�_ �a-4335-_�Si�-��—___._.. . ___-__—�_nii5c_splys-_ 79.8� ---IS6 ----------- -- ---- ---- --------- --- I 29. S4 •�' Totals Temp Check Nurnber 78 ._-- -- -----•------•----------- -- --------� ._�.---•--•--- -- -- - - Tem� Cher_k Number 79 �'1 79 SaFeli.te �lass Ca +Di-4330-49�Z+-50 - -- 7� --- --------------�-- ._^_ _- - __—.Tatals_Terap,Check__Nurnber.,__" _79_— __-._____ ._ ___ —Femp._Check_ f�lurnt�er= -----BQt-----• --------.�.------- -- ___.Sa _Seven _ Co>�x�er.s . Rce_ HdL,re—_.___�L-43�25ctZt5th-5�h _____ $2+ Severr Corners Rr_e 1-fdwe N1-43Qi5-2+SiZ+-5� �t7�-_5even_Cur.r,ers�3ce_}ddwe-_.—_�+1-43.ZiJ�j.IZ�=J.I� _._._ - ?�iID_- - --•- ----�.�- --- �- � Tc�tals Temp Check Number 80 Ternp Check Nurnber 81 A1 1_ E 5haughnessy Jr �i-4:3^c0-132-it2i ._82_L-£-- Shau�hrressy Jr-------�..�5: �22�Zt_13�-15--- -- 81 L E Sh�ughnessy 3r- ;=1-4280-Y32-S�0 81._L_E _�ha u�iar.essy-_.3'�^ --�----1 b _4'2'��Z+=132-00 ---_.._ 81 L E Shaughnessy 3r �3-42'2�-i32-ID� �-81._L--E-.Sbaughrfess}r_.Jr 11�= 4��IZ+=I32-.��_-- ai L � sna�r�nriessy s�- �s-4��a-ia:--sa 557 .—�_------------------ --•----...A_. '�'ot�1�7Qraa_Cbecl�hlurnber -----Bi-- - -�'�erna Check Nurnber H'� rprs 301 171.48 171. 4S .� --- --..�-, -----mi sCSOlys__._. f+3,�i� _ ? rnisc splys 33.75 �__ rnisr�plys _ 37.80 ------ ) "_'_ "'...______._._T-_ _ 3 Y tF. J J � c — �-----v_ " � : � � ^ San svc 1, �rEa. 75 - ��; � _�_.Ian.s.vc--- 126� 4�A • .7an svc ��7.20 __ �_.�_�_ �T�n _ svc 31 �2�0 i � Jan svc 98.3� --�• ------Ja�,._s.vc _ 1 _ �T46 35 � .IaYI SVC i=J`�-.J_ SJ ,� ------ --- -------- 3, Si 1. 3S ! . - � - ----- - �----- -� ---- -----�- �-----�--- --•-- ---- — -- i -8'?-S-f�J-A--A-t�-- ------ ..--_�i=4A�4-_11�D-1�------.------��1990._dLes�.---- �3�.-lL'a - A'=---- - ------ - ' ------'--- ---' Y 0_ IT41 � Totals Temp Chenck Number a2 � Ternp Check Nivn.her,__.__..-83-_��.� �.---- --------�----- --- -- - � , 83 Sr,yder Arug Stc�res ' �Z+i-433:,-35�-7�h' �� rnisc solys 36.16 1�3�Snyder_Dr.uo_Sta^es— —�d1_:�3�D5-•020,-c�D-----.---- --_.__1nis�.sn1_ys , 't�_�r3 _ 83 Snyder Ar^c�g Stc�r•es 4.'+i--43�S-S4Q�-4th misc solys 15. �9 ----fS3-Snydei^.Ti�^un_ ;tuires_ .�_._.�_�di=�r4?0-•�c0-�la---- -----,--.--------_---�s�isc__snl_ys_ _.�_ _ 33-�E� _�-� n3 Sriyder� Ar•ug SEC?`PS 2+1-43Qi5-�7+7P.i-7C� miec splys :�[,.35 ------ ---- - --------.�._----------------- ------ - --- ----- -- -----•---- ----------------- — -------- �z� isi. •��, �-.Tc�tals Ternn Chedt_Nurnber_----------.t33---.--___---- ---.-. --. �_�.- ------- ----.----------- - ---- 2: Feb 1 �3a � � Fri1�.�1.$'_.fi`.M----'-- ------- ,S�fnR-ChP..�k��rRbP>y= •- 9ir----- Clairns List ------Ci �_Y-s.� f_.tZend a�a_}� i g h t s_ .. Check __L�isutUa�r__ltandcr _[�]��--- ---- -ftca��.�n�_Gs�d.�_--- __&�i_5�.._F`�stlJ2is�t��_ch_1-'P _ �`�— � — - - -- Totals Sernp ChPck Nurrttrer 84 Temp Ct�eck Nurnber t�5 8:, Str�eichers ¢�i-443�-�2S-c� 85 -- intal s Temp _Check Number �_______ 8S ___„___ Sem❑ Check Number 9E, Page 14 -- --�C�lqln.�Ci�.S------------ Arnount. _ ? �_ �ut�g.�.t_t1�9--1��'�---- �-�-s;�� rnisc SOIYS ',_4. 50 Gtf. J� 85 Sur, Newspaper�s ±Z�1-•4;=40-�3V�-8�� hr^r� not attirnal i�c�so i5_ 3k s �16 S+�n Newspapers �1-4�1+0-I1�-1� budoet stmt 48.75 17'? - -- — ----- � 64_ �9 Tc.�tals 7eroa Cheak N�unber 86 �' Tema CI-reck Number 87 ' ' ' 87 U�_jJest �orrrmi�nicaticros �1-4� 1�-Q�7P.�- �1! _� �_ .7an svc wrno houses :=81. 44 i 87 U S WB5't Communicatic�ris �1-4:310-110-SID San svc �%J. SJ 87 U 5 West Cormnur�icatians �Z+1-421+Z�-Q�t3�-.3�h Jan svc 35:�_ 3� 87 11 5 West Comrn�.�nications ai-4�?1t2�-S�4�h-4� Ja» svc 43.7�, 97 U£i West Ccanrnc�nicaticmis �5-4c1�-S��-15 Jan svc i.1r8.4�� FS7 U 5 West Cornrnu��icaiic�i�s 15--k'�10-•06�-6Y� San svc JIZ�.JI7 ' S7 U S West Coromuriications �1.-4�1�71-t?i?��Z+-3� 3an svc 112.95 87 li S West Cr_,rnr�iunicatic��os �I-421V.�-�;��--�0 Jar� svc 35.47 37 1J S West Cornrnunicatic�ns �1-42y.+7.�-V.i�V�-7� Jan svc 35.47 87 l! S West Cornmunic�tiarrs 15-421R1-1D6�-b� Jan svc 35.46 o�a i , 3��. �� Tot: al s Ternp Check Nurnt�er __97 _�_�__!___ ___ __` �4$__IJY�7Lf_�J'l�tS 1.�YY1at�7.1� ed _ 01-441 �-�'_) +�-i::� m i s.� $�Y.�'s i tr:=. 92 _ OE3 UnSf=arrns Ui,lir�iit�d �D1-441�T.-�+Z�?�-2� misr_ Plath 3f1.45 a �b ------ -- •-- — _ Tatal s Ternp Check_Nurnber^ _:3'� ` _�_er�*-S't]eSk_t�ulebPr -----�f-�-- __H9_ifnited_S�nzr,al__Tr..sLs�ae _-----3Z�1��?�71,------------------.F�.eh_nr.^em F19 U»iteci Cenl:ral Trustee �X-413c-�20-c0 F=e6 prem ---_�J9._Ur,ite.ci_GentraJ:_Trus��e----_.L?!1,41s�.-�I�.S.4�-5ID---__.__.�« Feb._�T-er� h]9 Ui�ited Central TrusL•ee �1•-�+132-V.+70--�1?� Feb p�^ern ----3.cE�----- - - -------- ------------•------------------ --_.._._.__ «.-- �__'T'atals_ Tem�_CF�eck NurnL�Pr, - ---- St3-,---------------- -„_--- S�Z+4. 37 __ 179. 44 __ �b. .ji 1�.4i ��Ji�. J/ �a ii __'"'_ _'_' _"_._ _"__`___._____'__"_"""'_'.____..�...._'_'___ __'_'_' '______ _______ _ .1 ,- �E.k� 199� Clairns I._ist Fage 1�� _.-F�^i , 1;16•PM • ----.--------------- ------ - ---.-� Gib.Y_ or Mend��t�_He�.�hts ----------�-- -- --- --• -- - � ----S�m4� Ff�F�a1: Ni�rnbEzr� ---•- - ---�z� - - --- - - --- -._ ---•---Ternn.__._. . __ .--------------•-�--- �- �- , --- -- - • -- - •----� - -. .. - -- ^------ ---- ---� t�hp.r.k -.Number Vencior Name___.___ .�--- --- -. �rcaur�t._Cacfe�_- ----------Gs`�[Mterits- -._.-----��----- Arnc�un� - ---- — --- -- J _._ 3� L�roited_ Way_�'��F1:�4t]--------• - �t-_`��7�--___�,.-- - - - --------I�eb c��r�tr^----- - 3�=1.93 . - --- -•-- _ 2? 1_93 � � '; -- --• -- - �� -- - - ------ ---------------- -----------�_...------------ -�--------------- --- - Tatals TemD �f-ieck Number 9+Z� -----•- ---•------- - ---------------------- -----�-------•------- -----------�----�_��.--------------- ------- Terno Check N�.vnbei^ 91 j �� 31 Western Li Fe Sns--u------•--- -�1-413�-�2�i1-3�h -----y.�-• '---- Feb prern � 146. c� ..� _._--- __---- --------- -• ------•• -- -- -------- --- •----- -----` 91 - -- -------•- --•-- i 46. 130 - — -----Total� Sernn Check_NLunY�e.r._._�_.---- �1-•-•----------- •-----•-- �---- ----..�..-------- -------- -- - --- _Tarnn_Check Number -•---_.._.�_9� --._ _�_�_�.--•-- --- - --------- -•-- --�.._�__._.___.�------------ ---. -- ----- - 9c•_t�3intt�ron R�_S�Jeinstir•�e_--....---�-- -�i'-��.�l�h-- ------�- -- - --- -- --- �.1�e�_ svc�.-�-------- ------ --='•:�77.'77--------- -- ' 9�? Win'th�^aR R• Wei��stii•�e ]G-:3�210 Dec� svc 2�71a.67 _�_9;=.-Wir�thr.on,_�Weinstir.�e.__. _._____iZ+-2-.��1+�+----• ---.-----�--.,-----Der_svc.l.__i c��h.td� ---- -----• - 5, ��46. 44 --- a �-.'s:76--------------------- -------------- ---------------- --- - --- •-•--•------------- ---- -- -- - c ToL-als Temp L'F'IPCIL Nurnbei^ 9c `_ __—'.."'____'_'_'__'.__"____ `__'__�'_...'"_____ _..__._'_"'_____'_'_____'" __"___ Jc > __'_' _ -'_`____"_' '�"`._-"'__' _'_"__'__' __"""_'"__'_"_'__""" _'�_______ l iT. 74ID •- ----- ----- --- -- -- --- ------- -- ---- - i l �� +73. �Z+7 -----• : ; �Erand .Tc�tal ---.- ------__��__._�,---- -- -- .. _�v .__ � ' MANUAL CHECKS: _�6�90 CLAIMS LIST . c • � �__ ______��__.__�'_.--�__'.�____ .__._._._�_.��_ T '_ ___'_ .��_�..__".._ _ ..___._ __ _'_�____'—'__"�__"_�.^_�___'�_ ' _ �'__�— VrA �a� - - - --- - - -- - -- �--- ------ --- - - - - - . _._ _ ------ p -- -� -- -- --- ---------- ' � �� ^ 12470 1,000.00 M. W. Johnson refund de osit 12471 466.26__`Pettg cash_fund___-_.__�replenish_pet.ty_cash___-_ � 12472� 2,741.08 H. Huebner retarn rent deposit _____- ___.._.._._._�.__�__�_ _ __. __.__ _ .. _ 12473_._�„_3,222.3.2_,.__S.tate__CapitoL.Credit Uniori _.__.1/12._payroZl.-ded.actions , __ --__ _ .Z2474 475.00 Dakota Coatny State Bank " --- �A--�--` -+ 12475--.--�Z2,526,80----__. __. „- --•--,.--_-.-1/12_payroll_w/h�-�- --- — Z2476 5,596.24 Comm of REveaue 12/29 � 1/12 w/h - �-� • -----�. 12477 7,_003.66__PERA-._-.-- �---- _i2/.29-_Payroll.— 12478 37,962.72 Payroll a/c I/22 payroll _12479 _______458__ 81 _ _Roger�.Kroh.________��reimburse .expenses -- - --- ------- �� ^ 1.2480 82,600.00 American Natl Bank hond payment �________^____ ________ 12481 ___ 446.00.__1�fac_,Connection_�..__softwase_P ._D_--- - -- - ----- Z2482^ 30.00 Govt Training Svc regr __�_�___^,�____ 12484__ 852.5Q�Pa.ymaster -�-___�.1_year-mtcn/ins- - 12485 Z50.00. Dakota County warrant - _ --_---_--_-12486--.- -. -.43.00 _.. Ramsey_Count " --••---. -.---.------ --------- ---------- --- `� •------- -- --- -- ---------�---- 12487 160.00 Terry Blum clothing aZlowance ---�...�_.`. --- --12488 -----.125, 42 ---.Mike .1�taczko------------ "- _--------•.-- -- 12489 � 60.00 U. S. Post Office 1st c2ass mail permit _��___^ _ 1249_0 2_,639.29_Comm_of_��.venue-__.-.9th.:quarter-w-/h- 12491 53,978.78 First Trast bond payments - -- --.----------. ---.-------12492-.-----1_4.8.9.OTSCMA_12T - ---.I2/29-pagrol-l------- - ---------- 12493 210.00 FIAM regr. .._ __._ , ___�_12495 __1,0.00--Mn_Commerce..,Dept �--- notarg-renewal- -- � � 32496 3,222.32 State Cap Cr Union I/26 payrolZ deductions ____ ,I2997__ 9,_672..00._-�t'r.H_.�Rubbish�--__secycZing----- 12498 29.75 xrupeenys " � _12499.____.._�.4.85.0_0_-Oehrliens__Sanitation------"------ --- - --------_. __—.----- c 22500 504.00 A R Rabbish " . 3 _._�._� _ �25Q1�__�493w.OD__-._TriangSe.-Rubbish--------"---- — - 12502 717.00 Roadway Rubbish " � ______._�..._� —_._,--12503__ � B1C__0�.___.Knutson_Rubbish---_•----'-'----- — — � 12504 1,077.00 BFI ' " ----------_---.•------------125Q5_�-----52.00_.�_John Bo2and-------•---milea9e�------- -- 12506 •7,363.20 PERA I/12 payroll _ ______.��____— ___ �.,125.07.=�_12,557:.52__-.Dakota_Cty_.Bank -l/26-•payrolZ-w/h— 12508 475.00 " 1z26 paryoZl deductions ------ ---`-----_,125Q9.__138.,.6.0-7-..OB.--_Ci-t�-�l,_A__.PayrolZ-a/c---3/26-pag-r-o1Z— 12510 184.45 Deputy Registrar T/E plates P. W. ----------- - � - ------ ----- - ------- - - -- --- -•--------- -- - _---_------'------------- - ---- 289,282.10 -------._._---------------G..T---$399,755.17------...------------------- -- } CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO January 30, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administrator FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Proclamation of March 4-11 as Volunteers of America Week Attached is a letter of request from James E. Hogie, Jr., President of Volunteers of America (Minnesota), requesting mayoral proclamation of March 4 through March 11 as Volunteers of America Week. The City has passed similar proclamations for the past several years. Also attached is a proposed proclamation for consideration by the Mayor and City Council. y� _ t � VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA MINNESOTA 59U5 Golden Valley Road • Minneapolis, MN 55422 •(612)546-3242 January 25, 1990 The Honorable Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mayor Mertensotto: Volunteers of America, one of this nation's and Minnesota's largest human service organizations, has been helping others for nearly 94 years. Volunteers of America Week is scheduled for March 4-11, which commemorates its founding on March 8, 1896. I am asking you to proclaim the week in our behalf. � Your personal proclamation will be encouraging to those in the Mendota Heights community who receive care through our services. our dedicated staff and volunteers and the many people who help support our work through their financial contributions will be equally appreciative. Your interest and support makes a significant difference in the success of our organization. And, as you know, our success is measured through the lives of those we touch. I sincerely hope you will proclaim March 4-11, 1990 as Volunteers of America Week in Mendota Heights and ask that you join us in celebrating our 94th year of service. Respectfully yours, -,� � ` � J mes E. Hogie, Jr. resident JEH/j 1 Enclosures P. S. Your proclamation will be duplicated along with other proclamations and/or congratulatory letters to be put in booklet form. A booklet commemorating our 94th birthday will be placed in the reception area of each program. VOLUNTEERS �F p�MERiCA WEER March 4-11, 1990 WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America, a social service organization, is ceiebrating its 93rd year af service to the people of Minne�ota and the nation; and WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America is making a valuable contribution to the people af Minnesota by providing residential treatment centers �ar emotionally handicapped boys; a children's emergency shelter; pragrams serving autistic, autistic-like and/or developmentally disabled children and youth; treatment foster homes and group hames for infants, children and youth; homes far elderly andjor mentally disabled adults; senior citizen dining sites; pre-release and work-release carrectional programs and facilities for male and female of�enders and ex-affenders; a drug of�ensive program, and other programs and servic�s; WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America is commemorating i�s 94th year of service and urges other� ta uphold the American philanthrapic spirit �hraugh their cam�itment ta help those in need, NQW TXEREF�RE BE IT RESflLVED, that I, Gharles E. Mertensotto, Mayar o� the City af Mendota Heights, do hereby proclaim �he week of March 4-11, 1990 as VOLIINTEERS OF AMERICA WEER in Mendota Heights; AND BE IT RESOLVED, that copies of this proclamation be �ransmitted to the Volunteers of America as evidence of our esteem. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the City of Mendota Heights to be affixed �his 6th day of February, 1990. Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor `i.� ' T VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA MINNESOTA 5905 Golden Valley Road • Minneapolis, MN 55422 •(612)54G3242 YESTERDAY......TODAY......TOMORROW Volunteers of America has been serving the needs of America for nearly a century, providing over 400 programs in 240 communities across the country. Ser- vices are offered to children and youth, the elderly, families, disabled persons, offenders and ex-offenders, and to communities at large. Since its establishment in 1896, the Volunteers of America has demonstrated an ability to change and grow as our county, its needs, and the needs of the people change. Now, as in the past, the Volunteers of America's pro�rams are designed to respond to the concerns of in- dividual communities, and take a holistic approach to human care. Volunteers of America's continuing mission, to �.ovide material and spiritual assistance to people in need, regardless of race, creed or color. YESTERDAY Volunteers of America, the first religious social-ser- vice organization founded in the United States, began as a movement of humanitarian service that has lasted over nine decades. On March 8, 1896 Ballington and Maud Booth estab- lished a New York Bowery Mission dedicated to provide maceriai assistance as weii as spiritual comfort and guidance. �Yhen the Volunteers of America was less than twelve weeks old it had organized program services in Buffalo, Cleveland, Philadelphia, Indianapolis, St. Louis and MINNEAPOLIS. In June 4, 1896 Volunteers of America began their services in Minneapolis by offering food and shelter to homeless men. During those early years food baskets for Thanksgiving Day and Christmas, clothing and toys were distributed. Services were held in the Mission Hall at 9 North •ond Street and evangelical open air meetings were ered on street corners. A men's hotel and industrial department opened; and in 1920, Andrick Home at 245 Oak Grove Street was purchased as a girls' home. During the depression years children were brought :o summer camp at rented camp;ites; and in 2943 property on Dutch Lake, near Mound, was purchased to serve 200 boys and girls. This pro�erty was sold; and in 1954 land, north of Anoka, was given to the Volunteers of America for the site of a year-round program, thus Bar-None began. TODAY As society has changed so has the Volunteers of America. In Minnesota, the Volunteers of America provides services for children and youth, adults and the elderl��, and offenders and ex-offenders. Our newest service, CAN-DO, is a Community and Neighborhood Drug Of- fensive Program. CHILDREN AND YOUTH ■ Residential Treatment Center for emotionally and/or behaviorally disturbed boys (Bar-None). ■ A Children's Emergency Shelter. ■ 6 programs serving autistic, autistic-like, and developmentally disabled children, youth and young adults (In-Home Respite Care, the Inten- sive Treatment Center, Forestview Annex, Out- Of-Home Respite Care, Stevencroft Apartment, and Stevencroft Home). ■ In-Home Services and SS licensed treatment foster homes and correction group homes for emotion- ally/behaviorally disturbed children who may have a delinquency history (Family Treatment Program). ■ Specialized Behavior Program for boys diagnosed with conduct disorder. ADULTS ■ 5 homes for mentaliy disabied, mentaliy� ill, chemically dependent and/ar elderly adults (Farm Hoase, Ponderosa, Settevig Hame, Timberlane, and White House). ■ Semi-Independent Living Skiils Programs for developmentally disabled adults and youth. ■ Supported Living Services Programs affer adult foster care and training in self-help skills with full time supervisionat care. ■ Hot naon meals flelivered to shut-in seniors who are unabls to prepare their own meat (Home Delivered Meals). ■ Hot noon meals served to seniors at 42 community sites in Anaka and Hennepin Counties (Senior Nutrition Program). OFFENDERS AND EX-4FFENDERS ■ A women's jail, workhouse and work-release car- rectional program (Regional Corrections Center), � A men's pre-release and work-release correction- al program (Residential Center). As a multi-service agency in Minnesota, the Vo1un- teers of America offers community programs to in- dividuals af a1i ages. Tts staff is comprised af peaple who not only have administrative and jor professianai sac%al work expertise but who also have a commitment to the Christian mis- sion of the organization, the reaching and uplifting of all people, In addition to nearly 325 staff, last year more than 2,100 persons valunteered their taients ta heip enrich program services in Minnesota. In Minnesata the Volunteers of America pravides additional program services which are administered through other offices. These services are: long-term care facilities {nursing hames) and apartment housing for law-income families, the eiderly and hand- icapped persons. TOMORROW The Volunteers of Aznerica will continue provid- ing innovative services...meeting the unmet needs of individuals and communities. This wiii be possible through the determined abilities o£ our staff, our board membsrs, and you. We are proud of the quality of aur services; and we know donars want to support nanprafit agencies with which they can praudly associate. VoIunteers� af America of Minnesota Board af Direc#ars Iames W. Feil� Chairman Jamss E. Hogie, Presider�t* 1V1ark T. Flaten, Vice Chairrnan Ross E. Kramer, Secretary* Ronald L. Britz, Treasurer Mary E. Adams* Walter W. Faster* William L. Goodman Gordan M. Haga Peter L. Hauser Barbara King Jahn S. MacArthur William W. McDonald W. Lyle Meyer 3ohn T. Richter Erling W. Rockney Claytan W. Strandlie* Renee J. Tait Robert E. Van "Valkenburg Harm A. Weber * Aiso serve on the Volunteers of America National Board o£ Directors VOLUNTEERS 4F ARIERICA 5905 Galden Valley Road Minneapolis, MN 55422 {612}546-3242 The Volunteers af America is a SOI(c}(3} organizatian and is eiigible to receive tax deductibie cantributions. 3annary i99fl CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO February l, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works r c r SUBJECT: Bike Trail Complaint DISCUSSION• Staff is completing the final design for the 1990 Park Bond trail construction and we have been negotiating with the abutting property owners for the needed easements. Negotiations are for the most part progressing well. A few are not and where that occurs there has been some stiff opposition. We are trying to realign and make other changes where possible to attempt to satisfy where we have complaints. Staff has also notified everyone along the proposed trails re- gardless of whether an easement is needed or not. The letters were sent two weeks ago and we have had a few negative responses as a result of these letters. Dr. and Mrs. Bozivich, 1796 Trail Road, who also have frontage on Marie Avenue were contacted by staff concerning moving three pines near their home (see attached drawing�). We do not need an easement from the Bozivich's. The trees are planted on City right-of-way. We contacted the Bozivichs to see if they would like the trees relocated somewhere else on their property. The Bozivich's when contacted were extremely upset with the idea of a trail being constructed along Marie Avenue adjacent to their home. They would like the trail either eliminated or transferred to the south side of Marie. It is not possible to eliminate the trail as it is not only a City trail but also a Dakota County and a Regional or State Trail alignment. It would be possible to move it to the south side of the street however there are some technical difficulties with a stream running parallel to the road directly across the street which is subject to flooding during periods of heavy rain (see map). There are also other homeowners on the south side who would be affected, one. has installed some extensive landscaping farther east. That landscap- ing would pose a more difficult problem to solve than the Bozivich's. In addition, the original construction of Marie Avenue provided only 6 feet of boulevard on the south side, which would require some filling and excavation to widen the boulevard. RECOMMENDATION• Staff continues to recommend constructing the trail along Marie Avenue and on the north side of the street at this location. ACTION REQUIRED: Listen to the Bozivich's complaint and give staff direction on the status of the trail at this location. JED:dfw ,:+ �CE 1'H �� n ,� �' d �� ' i i� u E -- - ^ � �-- - � -� w a � w J f— _ Q � MOV E -- ---------PERF PVC�--- 7� DEEP / TRIM BRANCHES � -----EXISTING C.&G�-------- '- MARIE AVE. . CONSTRUCT 20��- 36 �� H I GH RETAINING WALL 160� LONG 8� FROM CURB r C�`� �-�% ��-�� .,�-� ,-' . , �� !,�" �, ! �f�C� � �-�� C.-��G� . �� U�'�`� ,.,.� u�� .��' ��z�.-�.�.�..�.�.�,. �-�z..- �..�.� , � � �=� . ��--�.�.---� . A �.,�` ,� � � '��, r .��:L��...; %� �'. �.�.f- �%��-.�-'�.�t..1 ��..,.� � L G��.�� i� �%G�- . f� p / - / C��u`.-'�...� . t.� ��n.�c �2�i�.� . �z� G�r�" �r� , �.�,��- C�.Grn�C-�tin..� � .,.E?�� ..�'.�-� ;.��1r�- Lc!��C�-- �� f � /.?��'.�rCl �[i U��/`�' t��'u�-C�t'h`'/�'�G%C_.� c� �' u��'�' G�.��L�'��...it.,�'`� ,;�:��G"�C�� . � � - ��;�� . �1 r , . � �..�,�/ G?��'.c�'�.�r��: r��.� ._.., � �,Gi( f. % �� 1f��, �":��1 f� �e��.' .�`�v�..�� CITY OF MENDQTA HEIGHTS ��• January 29, 1990 To: Mayor, Ci.ty Council and City Administrator Fram: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant ��--� Subject: Planning Case No. 89-40, Frye CAO Variance DISCUSSSON At the January 19, 1990 City Council meeting the Frye's had rec�uested a continuance of' their public hearing on their proposed Cr�.tical Area Clydinance variance. They requested a continuance to all.aw their architect time to draft revised plans. The Pianning Commi�sian had recammended denial to a setback variance to the bluffline and the Fryes were attempting to prapose a, compromise plan. The City Counci.l, at the January 19, 1990 meeting, instructed staff to have the appla.cant revisit the Flanning Commission if any �ignificant changes in the plan were made. Staff inet with the Fryes an Manday, January 22, 1994 and reviewed the proposed chang�s which were significant. • The Fryes were agreeable ta being scheduled for the February 28, 1990 Planning Commission and have submitted the attached letter stating their consent. {note: Precinct Caucus night ha� shifted the Planning Commissian ta Wednesday, February 28th) S�aff will publish notice and send mailed natice 10 days priar to the Planning Commission to satisfy public hearing requirements. The next City Council meeting after the Feb. 28th Pianning Commission will be March 6, 199Q. ACTZON REQUIRED If Council sa desires, they shauld pass a motion continuing the public hearing for Ca�e Na. 89-40 until �.he March 6, 1990 City Caunca.l meeting for 8t00 o'clock P.M. January �, 19 9 0 Mayor and City Council City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 Re: Case No. 89-40 � Frye Critical Area Ordinance Variance Ladies and GenLlemen: We met with Thomas Lawell, Kevin Batchelder, Howard Dahlgren and Paul Berg on January 22 with respect to the above- captioned matter. At that meeting, we presented a revised site plan and elevations for our proposed pool addition. It was the consensus of the above-mentioned staff inembers that our revised proposal represents a significant and positive change from our previous proposal that was considered by the Planning Commis- sion. The staff inembers informed us that it was the desire of the City Council to refer this matter back to the Planning Commission if we presented a significantly revised proposal. Accordingly, we hereby consent to your referring this matter back to the Planning Commission for further consideration, prior to consideration by the City Council. The staff inembers informed us that we need not appear at the City Council meeting on February 6, 1990, as originally planned, since you will, as a routine matter, refer this matter back to the Planning Commission. If our understanding is incorrect, please let us know so that we may prepare for and attend the City Council meeting on February 6. Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please call the undersigned. Very truly yours, �� Richard H. rye �� - Helen Frye RF:jc GITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHT5 MEMO Januar� 3Q, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Warks Director SUBJECT: Dodge Nature Center - Public Hearing Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, Case No. 89-25 DISCUSSION• The Planning Cammission conducted a public hearing last July ta consider a request £rom Dodge Nature Center to construct a New Visi- tors Center on their praperty in Mendota Heights (see attached staff memos}. Residents living along Dodge Lane attended the hearing and abjected to having the driveway access point for the new center come off fram their street. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the plan and Eorwarded it to the City Council, with a condition that the driveway not come from Dadge Lane. The Nature Center then reguested that the Gouncil hearing be continued ta allow them more time ta wark with Mn/D�T far approval of an access from Trunk Highway 110. Mr. Jim Malkowski, Executive Director of the Nature Center in- �orms me that he sti13 has nat reached an agreement with MnjDflT on an access paint, however he is in no hurry because they have not yet campleted th�ir funding drive for the center. He has requested ta be on this agenda because he would Iike to present his proposal to Coun- cil before it gets to stale. He promises to continue in his efforts with Mn/DOT on the access. REC�NIMENDATION � The Plarzning af a conditianal the Dodge Nature a condition that ACTION RE4UIRED: Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval use permit for a planned unit development to allow Center to canstruct an interpretive center subject to the access for the site not came from Dodge Lane, Canduct the public hearing scheduled for 8:00 P.M. to consider a request �rom Dodge Nature Center for a Conda.tional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development, i� Ca�.zncil desixes to imp3ement the P3anning Commission's recommendation, they shou].d direct staff to prepare a resolution appraving the Conditional Use Permit for the Planned Unit Develapment including the fou.r provisians listed on the staff znemo and the condition on access from the Planning Commission. NOTE: Notice of this meeting has been re�ent to the resa.den.�Gs wha attended the P1.anna.ng Commission hearing. JED:dfw T�: FRC}M : SUBJECT: DI�CUSSION � !� � f { r� ' ,1'' ��.. 7 f, • �i �� '� , � V CITY OF MENDOTA HETGHTS MEMO , Pl.anning Commission i __ � f , � : .� ,• ; � l� l �. C. . � r • i�. C:i .. t.J:. �_ �1 € � �, f., �,. .,,,� �� f ,., 1{ ;s,= —�• .'. �� . Jtzly 20, 1989 James E. Danieison and Kevin Batchelder Public Works Director Administr�tive A�sistant Dodge Nature Center -Interparetive Center, Case No. 89-25, CUP for PUD The Dodge Nature Cen�er proposes to canstruct approxa.mately a 12,000 square foot visitor center on their site located along Trunk Highway 1.10. Staff has had several meetings with �he Nature Center staff and their architects during the developmen� of their proposal. The attached plan represer�ts the efforts they have made and addresses our concerns. We offer the fallowing comments on the proposal as presented. 1. CUP for a PUD Because this facility is proposed to be ].ocated on a 2arge site that has several existing structures and because there are some other variances to the Ordinance that wa.11 be required, staff has directed the Nature Center to make their applicati.on a CUP for PUD. The PUD process ailows all the modifications to be handled in one application. The variations to the �rdinance as we determined includes: a. Allow a visitar center as a Canditiar�al Use within the R1-A Zone. b. A3.low 54 parking stalls versus 126 stalls. c. A].low more than one principle structure per individual lot. d. Al1ow a wetlands permit to construct a bridge over a drainage way. 2. Access Roads There are two access roads being praposed ta serve this site, the main pub2ic access is to be off from Dadge Lane wi�.h an emergency/delivery access off Trunk Ha.ghway ].1.0. During me�tings with �.he applicants, we discussed havi.ng the main access off Trunk Highway 110; hawever, when we met wa.th r_ G MN DOT afficials, they advised us that they would not apprave having a main access for the center off from Trunk Highway 110, 3. Neighborhood Meetina During meetings with the applicant, staff suggested that an informal meeting be conducted with the neighborhood befare the Planning Cammission hearing. That meating accurred on Tuesday, Ju1y 18th. In a conversation with the architect, sta�f learned that all four home owners along Dodge Lane were at the meeting and the concept of the Nature Center was very well received. However, the neighbors were very upset abaut having the main access came ofi �f Dodge Lane. In further discussion with the architect, they indicated that they would again press the Highway Department to allow far access from Trunk Highway 210. 4. Public UtilitiesfSewer Access Watermain is in the area and can be extended to the site, The Nature Center shauld petition the City ta have the line extended six month$ ta one year before expected completian of the Nature Center. �anitary sewer is not available in the area and an on-site septic system will need to be constructed. The alignment af the water line should foliaw the service raad, + Staff made a site visit and it appears proposed service road �rom Trunk Highway 110 canstructed withaut damaging the oak Trees. ACTION REOUIRED Conduct the from the public City Council on JED/KB:kkb to us that the can be required public hearing and based on input and Commission, make a recommendatian ta the the request for a CUP for PUD. f r� PLANNING REPORT DRTE; CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REt�UESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The Thomas Irvine Dodge Nat� Paul at the site of Mrs. Do organization owns a�d aperates o€ Mendata Neights, cansisting this site, they now propose to their prograrn far the care, natural amenities. 25 July 1989 .� Dodge Nature Center Southwest Gluadrant, Trunk Highway 110 and Delaware Avenue {see sketch) Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development ire Center's headquarters is in West St. ige's residential estate. Mrs. Dodge's a substantial nature preserve in the City af most of the former Lilly estate. Cln build � a substantial structure to enhance preservation, and appreciaiion far our 2. The proposed structure will be located dawn ihe hill from, and approximately 550 feet south of, the old Kirchner farmstead contiguous to Trunk Highway 110 (south side} between Dadd Road and Delaware. Attached are copies of preliminary site plans, floor plans, and elevations af the proposed structure. Also enciosed is a copy af a short Ietter from the Nature Center's architect, Setter, Leach & Lindstrom Inc., describing some aspects of the development. Mr. Jim Malkowski, Director of the Nature Center, is preparing a mare detailed statement (at aur request), which hopefutly will be available in iime for submissian with this repart. 3. Staff has met severai times with Mr, Maltcawski and the archiiecis to review elements af the develapment proposal. Some suggestions by Staff have been incarparaied inta ihe preliminary plan. The Dadge Nature Center is a public spirited group of people carrying out a very important {�tiBSf-�3Uk}IiC function. The educational impact on aur youth has obviously been considerable, and their appraach to the current development is one of a cooperative effort to achieve the best results. 4. A fund raising campaign will precede construction, therefore, there is nq immediate concern far approval of the development proposa! by the Ciiy of Mendota HeigFrts. Mr. Malkowski notes that there is time to cansider adjustments and canstructive changes to the plan, � Dodge Nature Center, Case No. 89-25 Page 2 5. For purposes of general review, potential areas of concern are noted as follows: a) Main Access The main vehicular access is via a new roadway to be built off of the cul-de-sac serving the larger residential lots in the southwest quadrant of Delaware Avenue and Trunk Highway 110. A roadway will be constructed down the hill to a SO car parking lot on the east side of the creek separating the parking area from the structure. Because it is essential to be able to reach the building with emergency vehicular equipment, a second driveway is proposed through the Kirchner farmstead directly off of Tru�k Highway 110. Here, a right-in and right-out access only is provided (as is the case today). Both of these roadways are proposed to be constructed of gravel and the access to the parking area is a 6 percent slope, with an 8 percent slope proposed for the service drive off of Highway 110. We suggest that building both of these driveways is perhaps redundant. Perhaps additional consideration should be given to constructing a single driveway off of Highway 110. This driveway must be constructed in any case since it provides direct vehicular access for emergency vehicles, as well as access for the handicapped. You will note in examining the site plan and grading plan that a considerable amount of grading is required for the access road to the proposed parking area. This extensive filling will be highly visible from Highway 110. Without curb and gutter and asphalt, there will likely be a maintenance problem relating to the drainage as well. b) Access Drive Turnaround You will note in examining the site plan that a T-shaped turnaround is proposed at the end of the service drive in the front of the building. We have suggested that a more appropriate turnaround be provided for cab delivery and the turning of fire vehicles, etc. There should also be consideration to the handling of services to the building. The structure, as proposed, has no service entrance, nowhere to park a service vehicle near the building, nor anywhere to pick up a dumpster. Such services would seem to be essential for a building of this scale. Where there are places of public assembly to the scale proposed here, there would be deliveries for catering, equipment, and supplies, etc. Even in most residences, there is a back or side door for this purpose. c) Parking Places of public assembly of this character (according to the Ordinance) require one parking space for every 3-1/2 seats for an auditorium and one parking space for every 3 seats in a theater. The auditorium proposed in the structure accommodates 126 seats. The amphitheater will accommodate approximately 225 persons figured at 2 feet of width for each person seated. The parking lot O�dge NaCure Center, Case i�to_ 89-25 Page 3 proposed will accammodate 50 cars. Thus, the proposed parking Iot may be inadequate during an event and, particularly if there is anything going on in the rest of tF►e building, during an event in ihe amphitheater. The parking lot is well designed to provide drop-off paints for bus operatian, however, there is no piace to park a bus in ihe parking lot. This may be a matter of some concern. Mr. Malkowski has pointed out that they are considering shuttle parking from the Sibley High School site. Such services might be more efficient if the main access were aff of Highway 31D and would have no impact upon contiguous residential areas. Mr. Malkowski €urther points oui that there is io be a meeting with the neighbors along the cul-de-sac aff af Delaware Avenue where the main access is now proposed. This meeting is io be held on Tuesday night, July 18th. d} Tree Preservatian This is a relatively minor paint since the prepared plans indicate the construction of a service road through the Kirchner farmstead, which would very likeiy resuli in the destruction of four large aak trees. The general rule in developing around oak trees is to stay away from under the canapy of the tree. If these roots are disturbed to any degree, the tree will likely die. It woulci appear that this roadway and the water and gas mains indicated on the plan could be relocated so as to overt this probl�m, e� Access to the Lower Levei The praposed structure's farm, use of maieriais, and siting has many fine features, with considerable character appropriate to the site and function. There appears, however, to be no handicapped access to the lower levei workshop space. Funetianaily, this cauld be corrected by constructiqn of a pathway from the upper level to the lower levei of the exCerior of the building. Ideatly an etevator replacing one of Ghe two stairwells to the lawer level wauld be mast appropriate. - f) Sumrrtary The general concept of building a nature center on the f�lendota. Heights' site will surely be an asset to the City, the center itself, and the regian as a whole. TFrus, it would appear in the public i�terest for the City and oihers to work with the Dodge Naiure Center ta achieve the best possible salution, The use itself is not specificaliy listed as a permitted or conditionai use i� the R-lA District ta which this land is zoned. However, simiiar uses sctch as golf eiubs, eountry ctubs, and tennis clubs are listed as conditional uses. Since there is no separate lot for the proposed structure and there are other principle structures an the overall site, a conditional use permit for a planned unit development is reguired. � Dodge Nature Ce�ter, Case No. 89-25 We have informed Mr. Malkawski of these areas of fee2s that these ideas shauid be explored and welcome Commission and Council's interest and suggestions. He ihat there is no need for an immediate decision, but like the process to proceed toward a solution. Page 4 concern. He s the Planning further �otes ihat he would • � _�� . ,` . ✓ � `,��rr��r�� f�� : ^,.%% '� .:. �/�� `�� . r;:. �!%�;'^l�.�'� —� . ...�. .. � ►SUBJECT PRC?pERT Y NORTH � SCALE 7"'=40Q' �---� �--- _____----_i � ---___.____.__ u------�..,_ ---` G-� �� . J N' Z � , a , -� r„E � � • , • __�_ � --- — —— r BOAFtD OF pIRECTORS MRS. OLIVIA IRVlNE DODGE PRESiDEF2T PHYLI.IS ABRAHAMSEN AMY ANDERSEi�t ALMA DERAUF THOMAS DOpGE EttZABETH S. DRISCOLL CIOVER EARL OLIVIA C. FORD STANI.EY N. GUSTAFSON WlLLIAM tiUEG SALI.Y KLING IANTHALEVANDER TFiOMAS M/�,iRS PNIL MURRAY GALEN PATE GINNIE RECORO R09ERT Ri00ER SANDRA B. ROE VICENTA D. SCARI.ETT GOfit70tt SH£PARD �ANLEY SHEPARD 'EVEN Tdl,1REK .�ILLIAM WARD, JR. WIL�IAM WEST JAMES M MALKOWSKI EXECUTiVE O1REC70R �lro�ras �rv«re �oQ�e �a�ure G'e�ter 17$5 CHARLTON STREET WEST SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55118 (812� 458-4531 T�h rr n�atus �►f h� �►�i..�� r sn r (Written by James M. Malkawski on July 18, 1989 for the City of IVlendota Heights' Perusal) The Dodge Nature Center is a very rare commodity of open green space and altruistic programming for the coznmon, whoIistic good af the people. All this is furnished by a non-proiit organization located in the communities of Mendota Heights and West Saint Paul, Minnesota. The Center is camprised of some 3I0 acres of freshwater ponds, roliing meadows, reintroduced prairie, oak woodlands ac�d active streams. These furnish the life zones for concentrations of wildlife - mammals, birds, insects, reptiles, amphibians, fish, native trees, shzubs, herbs and grasses - all living in balanced ecasystems. The Center is owned and operated by the Thomas Irvine Docige Faundadon which consists of a 24 member Board of Directors and is managed by a prafessianal staff of 13 full-time people. Scores of long-ternn, continuous volun- teers representing aii parts of our communities provide thousands of hours of individual service at the rate of approximately 100 hours per week. �3egun in 1967 by Mrs. Olivia lrvine Dodge and her late husband, Arthur, the Dodge Nature Center (DNC) land was purchased as a series of vegetable fazms. Within the first five years of its existance, many peaple would invest thousands af talented work hours and hundreds of thousands af dollars meeting, planning and decitiing how, meticulously, to convert these farms into a prezniere urban nature center environment, Carefully lacated dikes, trails, pands, raads, boazdwalks, apzary, maple syruping (sugar bush) facilities, observation blinds and narive species plantings were set into place. Stnalt n�odular buildings were nnoved in to establish classroozn meeting space (the "red schoolhouse", ��lab�� 3riC� "museum"�. �le second five years, 1972 ta 1976, the initial pxesentation of the DNC ta the West Saint Paul Schools would accur, allowing the nature center cancept to emerge ir� the pub�ic eye �ently and wholesomely. With aIi of this base-line work in place, the next ten years, 1976-1986, would see the DNC grow and pxosper for several continuous reasons, reasons which exist tatiay in even greater degrees. The desire and need for enviranmental educatian began to acutely emerge in I967 with the publ'zcation of Silent Spring by Rachel Carson; the awareness and concerns for our environnnental conditions has continued to motivate peopie ta see nnore and more of ail that the DNC represents - open space, non-tax based action, environmental education, educational recreation, close-by beauty and worthwhileness, wiidlife protection and empathy, etc., etc. Countless thousands of correct decisions were made during all these years, fram where to put the new barn at the Model Farm to wliich educational units to tise where and wi�en; from which staff to empioy to wliich baby birds to save. Page 2 Most critical, however, during these past ten years was the creation of the DNC's Graduated Program, the program which 42,0(}0 school children utilized as part of their regular school curriculum in 1988. Created in 1976-77, trialed, rewritten, marketed into the Dist. #197 schools, followed up with full use by Dist. #6 (South St. Paul) and Saint Paul Academy school systems, these are very serious, very calculated lessons presented in the most enjoyable way, outdoors, by specialists, helping to satisfy the ever present need to know more about the natural world in which we live - for education itself, for self-defensive protection of the environment we need to survive and to become better decision-makers as these students inherit our world. Currently, the Burnsville Public Schools (Dist. #191) and the Inver Grove Heights Public Schools (Dist. #199) are working on programs to take fullest advantage of the DNC's model environmental education program (the Graduated Program). But with great success comes serious decisions and supportive actions. Growing along with, but slighdy behind chronologically, has been another program element of the DNC, "the Public Program". For ten years, more and more people have become aware of the DNC and its quality azea and programs, and have sought to use them. No program was initially established to accommodate these people, mostly from the local area. First tens, then hundreds, then thousands began showing up, annually, at the DNC gates - just motivated by interest and a desire for what the DNC demonstrated it could do so well. This popularity caused the DNC to offer progranns for families and adults several times a month. Now, 12,500 people per year are spontaneously coming to DNC activiries, far overextending the capacity of current staff and facilities. To address this, the DNC staff and board spent two years, 1986 and 1987, drafting a five year plan. This was followed up by a professional - independent "management smdy", has been supplemented by a "professional - independent economic study" to consolidate the DNC's past, present and future. Meanwhile, more than four million dollars had been spent plus countless volunteer hours from board members, professional staff and other community- oriented citizens to bring all of this up to date. is: To date, tiien, the DNC Mission Statement remains the same as in 1967. It 1. We believe in teaching and engendering in our young a love and reverence for nature and all things pertaining to it. 2. We believe in the importance of training them in ecology and conservation. 3. We believe we must give them t�ie realization that in nature we are all part of one another and whatever happens to one species will inevitably effect tt�e whole chain o£ nature, which includes man. 4. And finally, we believe we must instill in tl�em the knowledge so necessary for them to be good stewards of the land and protectors of our natural resources. Page 3 Five year plan canceptual priorities are: 1. to grow horizantally {more of the same Graduated Program's most successful emphasis) 2. to grow vertically (expand the Graduated Progxam to its second and third phases, Junior High and Senior High) 3. to accammotiate the Public Prograrn efficiendy and effectively To do the latter, through three years of inericulous planning and decision- nlaking, the Rachel C. Lilly Freserve portion of the Dodge Nature Center, 15Q± acres Iacated in Mendota Heights is the portion of the DNC which will be utilized to cury out Priority #3, the Public Program. Already 3 1/2 miles of hiking trails and cross-country ski trails are in place. The Nature �enter owns three residentiai-type facilities on this property, housing DNC staff ta monitor and manage this pmperry. Already between 3,000 and 5,000 people �se the property annually despite its absence of any publicly usable building (or reskrooms, for example). The reason, of course, a11 of this suzprises folks when they hear of the depth of organizatian and the extent af the DNC program and use, is because the use is quiet, personalized, intimate, almost sacred kind of activity and use - fun, enjoyable, meaningful, usefuI, educational, etc., but not bIatant, blaring, obmusive, intrusive or gaudy. And all plans are to conrinue this critical but subde, quality approach to our society's demonstrated need and desire far this kind of environmentai education and recreation. As a parC of the Public Pro�ram, the Dadge Nature Center's Board has deternuned that a Visitors Center building is crirical to and for the peaple's use af the DNC, to and for people's environmental education and recreation, and to and for the proper use and management af this 150 acre pazcel of invaluable land and wiIdiife. Since January of 1987, the Dodge Nature Center professional staff and Board have ever so carefully examined all known available alternadves and have selected the final site, designed the precise building they {we} need now and for the next SO to 100 years, and are undergoing the necessary social, palitical and econ- amic steps to complete the pracess. Untold detailed efforts have already been invested in this process as has more than $100,000 in paid fees for professionai services. All of this, the people's dernonstrated desires and needs, the Thomas Irvine Dadge Foundation's and the DNC arganization's response to this need measured in immeasurable talent, countless howrs and rnillions of dollars, bring us to this juncture. Now, we are rec}uesting the City of Mendota Height's fall cooperation in tt�is tlirust and effart of establishng a new Visitars Center in conjunctian with this priceless resource to make all this available ta its peaple and those athers this program and project will attract. We Iaok to you for help and support in this serious and altruisric effort. � : �;tr��4:.�,: ;:�� ,:� � : � � . � : . . �..� _ :�r � ��, . : ��-��a� . . . . :a��:�4;`� . • . . *- , . Case No. _ . .�•:J„ - '�••,'{ ,: '•. _ :•::� ;• . , . . . , . .::��:.i�••.' � .�, ' • . ��: , `: , ' , . , y.,;. ,"..�'.J � i' Ht - �. . 'zr'S.`.� •s.. ..:. . _-�:-� � - . . CITY 4F MENDOTA HEIGHT5 . , ' _, . . :>,.. . . . �,��,'' :`�!?�-ti•� ��s:��"_ � ' ��: `DAKOTA. COUNTY ��= MINNESOTA . � � . �;; } ' •� . . : � ne :1... � �ri! i -' .a,;,. f . . . . '.1 7'±'. , . �' ._ +S:). ">,�:f:a++��; ;.. .�+u;i.��.• ., .�. . � .. � � �j.`..'.: . ; M_.�:.Fi�.: . . ' • r ",t� . ' , . . y' •��,*�'•i"ti�:.�i.i5•:�'�r`rb�. ,` ''°i:•.,. ,. _' ..: j..)i'.''..� r� . • ' . , '.;`•`t'.:'';.s.;r.xr -; � ..,;=�rtr. ; , � AF'PLICATION "FOR� CONSIDERA.TION ,�.; ;,.,; ' ' .:, • ,�F•" �?- .- :°�y,. , . . ;� : ci - �ry:::��,;.v,K i,• .�: ;i:�3;�:. . .. .... . . . .. � f... , . . ::re: .. ._.. ., . . . • j , : �'j' .:'%_�}'Yi;.r � '�y � ` ' ' > ':''.:....O�kl:.,.:.;.. , � � • ;'��,; '`��-`i;;�t•<<r�;.,:;':;,';�:. . �t, . '. . . � ':�' PLANNTNG;R.EQUESfi • ' � , • •� - � " `�r�' - :>:.:;��'=' ' . . . •�-_: .�'.' F�-y � y�� +Yy.•.w... n ... �..r�� . .. . w1.�• ' ' � ..1 • i�� y� '� -lrn�i ''.-i. , �y : �2. `• '�`��Y' . , c ^('...it y�.0 � 1. �7'F.^'.. .�1} 4?.�y� N"��••�''7 �:.SI f fY, 1 i3��Y:^.•�" , . ' . . • ` +. �; i•i . . , � ' _' .^l 1 �j'?� '. • :%�:' ��d'�?� :ft. , :r:s=i, i¢?�"''�`��r�:�;,.;�'�:=..:' � .: , „ ` '. .:,�,.: . :; �;w,,tri.�+ti;�xa,,.:��.: � ' Date of :Application June <3Q, 1989 ' ' ir . :. "•r^ :; - ' %a..,,. Fyv4`°� �'�' ^-` '/`ev,�i ' � .. .. . .•x.:._..: • �.�_ L,^•.:..r .��;..a ... - I� !� �' '�":�,� .�'�''�,Vw-'St��'�xCt��iti::`� . . � �:.�'Y . �-^��..�.� �:�� y•>r.._: . .$JOV•00 : -�...>;...:sr�- .� _ ": - . ;:s�{,`= . • . . F'ee Paid • rl-1 (-�q �-� . 1:L'..A { licanC�`�';' . . • , • �.:<= . �;,��'.•"�' . , . , �-�- s ,- ..,�' � ;= PF '��i'' � ', �'. '. � }. :'•`, , . �{. 4y ;' . . � . _ . � •:: f;_ .+�`. : �. . �;C'• .t ��' �;��; •:��,..Name; �� Setter; Le�ch" &"Lindstxom,�"Tnc. (Architect) • � � " . � . =:, ��*2�;Y:�''�.�.,°-��.,�+y�;; Last. . � .:a:.;; , First•�.�,• , , . ... . . Initial . . . � .�. .>>;; . , � � .. • ~� '{ •4:%+-:��.ki�i-,..y,: : .,t,. _ ... . ,. , • .i : . • , . • � , ,. . . . . ''' 9, i ,.;;f�!,�: �.�? 4.�., t , . .., . . ;. .i., • : ':,��=.. �';" ' i011 Nicoll.et°Ma11�".°'� ' ' .'''Minnea alis � Minnesata � � �55403 ' .:.; .�,;��;,Addrees: p � . . � ', ti .,.° 5 t��r . i >,;;: .;��;.,��r,�r;��h��Number,�&.:Streett.r�s�{...i. .,.. � ��wz� �CitY�,-r�-,:•��•��,. ! r State > ��., :�,� -i •Zip, �;; . ;". 1' •;3+-'� "�E�'r's:;t s�ST;'; . . . , ,,r .'�: }' .:i• ' �,i.i'�i�'i.3'•, . .. .. . . , , . •,wf.. �• i;i'`=:z`�.�.v"-.F`.� '.:�.r ` ,- . .',.' ' > r'• ,i„ . • ' . ' , . , � '�"i � . 'c 't"�';;,�=�.�.;�,Talephone Numberi (612)� 338-874]. � . "'`' � �. . . . . . � :t . .. • . iy;;••'�ws;�'�!'i4k'S,�, y.R;r�+i'r'i:;� r, �,.....i . .} : f �'^�y�riy�.}i� X y+�,,�.,;� 34i; . ' .�4 i' . , '". ,: ' :' - � =�•ts"' �y" • ' I,M::; j � •.r�x3+F..=• ;S�''e � ::.. ,�v, �.y.,: ' `'-'. , . , A� ;ri;: QTATItC'.i��`�h`t''.'"'�, . ` f'•?``;' � r.��v ` . , � :wR'" ,;';?: Name:`��'�' Malkowski . . : . . .`, �'James . � M, � - ` , ;::? ::.� ,,1.;...:�_�:; Last . . . First � Initial _ . . `' ;. ; 5;��: : `�c' ,`�.:;, ;, • � • • .' '. . .: _ • ' �ri ' ; r :�„� '';�:::.�:;�;�=•;; . ..• ..• a, �' ; -, � . . ..r�', ..�:��~.'�.~Address.: � ��5 Charl�.on Stree� ' � West' St. Paul Minnesata ' 55118 ' - f"1'- �:`�¢�:''�:k;`:'F�'''(`�s<Number &:Street � . . . ��.'City . State , Zig .... • ' .�" �:. �; ,� j''d�l'Y. 't..ij•..C��+.(vly,�ij•:s•'.Ir.';�'.'�i'ft+. , • • ::y'�i �;FS'• � +,' y .' .�7''•'.A i:.�ti.t ; r' . ' . � " e .: . . .'`:+'r ��i� fi+`'•�h�'rv...i�':i.�� ' ' ' :�}; ;.r- , ' . 1��;�`=f;',Street��I,ocatlQn of•Property.�in�Question:;; . : • ; . ";i` : f�'Cr ksr;�:i�'.�"�� ? `A3''� . ., ,. f.: „ i� :i.,r,.. , . -.,i �4� , _�i, , .'Y r . ' ' '' • .� ;.:'• •' ' �'�'. � . • � . . ' �:.t�"�`�;�'"��'�'�y ��t:'•"` Highway i10 between Dodd Rciad �and Delaware Avenue ' ' ' � � c , � ,�Y.F ��. _ �,: ..�:.;: : • � a • ' . �� 'I.�ga1'Descrfption of Fropexty: ' .. �"• .�,` �, . ' '- ' . .. . : . _. , .�'� ` � .; ,,. . ; ..f.. . r '„��1i:�;.•;y�:.•�;;•, . •. :. . . . , . . , ,_:'_�•= The�' SEl/4 of the 5W1J4; and The NE1.f4 `of the SG411'�, except the west 39Q feet of � '.�J:ni!t�l�r�'''""y . .x... • ��• �;`��;�he�:�eas�� 599,5 feet except sthe .south 56I.5 feet thereof; And; The z�wi/4 of the .`. %° "r':` ` "r:,•�'.1.;=`;'::• � : '. � , • , ,•: . ; . . � . ' �''t.rri�N. ` 3. - ';.�- ,:= , SEl%4;�a11 in� Section 25,:=Township� 28, Range 23; And: �Lats 15, lb,' 17, � 18, �I.9, ':`, ' _•;;:; :,r,, � � - . ; - ' . , . . , `°'_:;. `�"R20;?�:•21.;'�;22, 23,' �24, 25 and126;• G3en',Tora, excep� Delaware Hills, and except the � . �::H.��t::`'�� , . , ,' . ' : : . � _: � an s escr� e a Nos . • an : � y�- � � `.«z�;: !.;� . . .. ��:�:�'�>;iType: of�>�Request: �.:, ; • . . 'r , . � '=i, =fRezoning • ., ... � . . :}: . � -'� :. =.E, . �. . .. • .;X'•+.� .� it?fivs. �:t��,.�:,..:�:�? I. � ,.. . . . . , . . , .. � . .. VST�.�iRCB .� ;. .. . ; . J . , � ' r �,, . . _ L„:;�'• `,:'�i"4��'�`,�,''-�:�t' `�.?:,'�� j' ' ,�:.., _ i ... . . :y;:;; f- , p},� ,:..�.,.. . . . . .. , . , , : Conditional Use Perm3.t , . . . . - . ' ;i, a� .�t��J��l:'.: .�+i • 7 � �;=:`�r'wr;;` ;;.,� �'.�n.�"�^�'�`.�`.' . � , .. . g .t• Canditional Use Permit for P.U.D, .. ,., . , , '�c *� •' +*' o�;�- r'�'c' ` �:3_d «, t., ,. t„ •'' . ��y�� :;�� c � .� ��` : ; , ,�. . ." . ,� , � .. . - ,w - .. Mi.nor. Conditional, Use PermiC � ; • : . ,.,�';�t ,.^v�t'.,�"s;:; : " .,... . .',. ._., .. , . . :"':i�.'.i,',, �: . e� i;: irC -tv�y;?.4:c i�........ . - a..3.. ....,_ . u �, - ` `• � - .,�F�` ,. �",�, � � F �.,�. f -•i ��...,.:� • Subdivision.Appxoval., , �'� ; , ;� � :: . . ;,�,: , ��.� � � ,•�.,::�� •.:.�:� �, �3�a,:i -' e�,.,; . .. "=-n .. . . .. �- ,,�r;�,.:, 's' •r' � .. .,�?�;:.:�%r��r� +� Fiti ��$'-�F,�'-� . � . i - . . � i'e �:.`t,�� }�'..:�: ;;_� Y. < ' .. �� _�;``, :Plan Approval . . . '„ `� �t�� .. 'u`»!?'�j� 'Fr'��'�r�.' w''i'��i.'� ,`'.ii�, . �. ' r �' �+ y....;.y. * ' ".,.Y � x;'r.� _ h , j: . r t • ;�;ii":i':?., ar ��A ; ; �. �:F r, •, h� •� . . � � n�.�•*f•i;, �'.+' �'�'2r'i"`1 fW��.8T4C�{B..:P@I'Etij.�•':'� . , • �� , ' F '�'* � , .:� ` � i;-�"y��:�±,.��K,��,�n,k^ '��: {:�yi'�' ' ` . • ':+:. ' ��1t�T � • , aj . , , . : '�� 'i:'.k ,�,�., •t: � '� . ' ;. . r"X�? `�� =i' .:� •'• '' 7 :.s : . t?i^L: .a' 'ri�iss'..� t � � .? � � .:tr , .p.� . • ., t.� 1 ;.�, '.� t'.: .wf':t:r...�� f '1 , , t" 3.; , . q•+�`.�.(��, . . �. .. . � .. � . ' ,r?r'.,ri�'��:l��W':: . ± � ' �' . . , . • ' . . _ ; '� , . • . . .ii_ ;'itijF��,:.i•_ . , " � `�:.'. � , ,. • • � . 'j'; , . �4!"i•ct;sr�. .. � . . .. � . �.a.'ty;;'s�,< � , . . . - ' � •r. �. . "i �w: .. r � . . „ . . .� � ,, .. . . . .•': ' _ . . " , � ��. � . ' ' • . . , ' ' . . �i�~?av�w�7! .,j' y.i�G..7w.�. � .� ' ' . . 'j�: �� :ir� . :=�i�:;.'�'; ` . . �' . • � , ..r. .3 . � n . r . , �. :i ' • i -.... � • .. . „ • r ` • . `, ' ' � .. - , . . . _ -S ,f . . `•1 . �. � ' • , , .. . . ' , � . . • � � _ , ., � •� .. . . _ i. . .. � .. • • . ,. ;i: • . ,• i, ' , :� . . . . . . '�!'�� . � • . . . :� � . . . . '_ :7. .,`': ''. , . • ,� `a�:'- -• • Applicable City Ordinance Number • � � � •�a "�`''� ' ;� • Section - � •� ,��`�. � _ ' � . � ' ..,4..;. r �. � , . ' Present Zoning of Property: � - �' ' � ;':''.''. ,� , • .�5., .. - , � ... ;:�=,.; _>,�� . i . . - :} f'�' .. � . Present Use of Property: • . ' Unu'sed' ... "._ , • • , . ��<,�. _ •• � i ' ' ,�; _ . , . : • , . . ., �,;�,- � �::. , '� • Proposed Zoning of Property: � � � - ' � � • � ` • �•"�'' '�,��`':'�'� ' �'" .•t.,• i .i 't . i � � . . . . . � ��; � �i .' ' ..�. ' h t .... � a. . • . . .7.° ...�.,i�~ : . ' • �'� , • Proposed Use of Property: . .. , ;y`=.�%''��F�`�: .. ' '. 'l' � . . ,I. . �1 v . , , ' . . . .. . ., . • . . -•.fr' , � . � ,, Number of people intended to live or work �on �premises: • •' � ' • -- � , � _ • ' .' ;i;: � � . • . ' , S� � :;,5:� " � :;� ,. : , : :: . . .:4t1:1: � �:1.. •. �„`.-�x.I-r.f��t� �J'. . - .,,...: b —'., .,;....� ... -. . _. . • ...::.r.... � .., ..._.� .... .; : . . . .. . .-.�, s�CS;.,;' •.��. : i •• •� ''�` �I h�reby declare that all atatements. made''in t�is, request and `ori�the�"additional;::�� ; ;'.'`�-'; � . �: : � :, . . r'.i:�tfii.l?r�i��.?:�'�' �=~' "i',, �'.T , :. .. • ' � .. ; '.,5• .•.:�,�1 .1:..�� : .. , . , .,1 � . . . . i�� ;4,��• '..,} ; %.: ' material are true. • ' ,:..�M.;f. .i�: :.k.F_ _ --,: ,s.._ j�' t �;,,`,;.- . � � : �. : �.�' :�• ��:'c: . � .t:f�T: +':� . _ i . • � ,_ . , +�, , . • , 1 r ' ' • .i.a+`Yf: � ... , . � . Signature of plicant � �f ;,;' �' ? � . , . , , .,:�. . . , ' ' .:,; �. June 30. 1989� • ' � >�s�.�: � � _. � ' � ' � ... . ' • � ' ':: Date . ;. . . .�, :�=::;";. �-� ,.Y . • ^ . . r � � < � w�; . . , 1. �6::.ji�:. � . •�. � . .� � . ' i7J. . . ' . , I . � :f'; ��•. ...:. . , , _ . . , ' • . `',�:`� ;: �.� : • , , - , � , , • ;.;.; , . , • I '•� -� ",i . 3'i � . , Received ,by (title) , ; . .. '''�':N`�'�°`' ' `• .' " , � 4 �,- , , ' . . . . . ::x .. � • , .. .. , . . , _. �:r�:. • ' � � : . ..,� ;;...,`> - NOTE: The following plans sha11 be drawn and attaclied to this application: ;;�;��:��,t , � � ' ` . 4` ^ . A. Applications involving a Variance shall submit, the" following.plane::..; �:;�:j:�;;i:;�; �:' _ ... . .. . ..� ._ :_ ._ ,. :.. ` � . �_��'�' ._ . " : • �'� . • � � •• - . • - •• � �� Date Received • �' Initial" ��' � ` �� • � -- . :fi; �`-- , ... . . . _ ... . .__.... .:�•-. • • � i� - - . ,_.::;�.::.;:,�y,;. . , 1. Site Development Plan , ,. _• ', . � •;�,��',,`i ;.` ':� , . f=� ;�.� ,s�•' s c i s; t;.;s.:.<.;�.. . , - 2. Dimension Plan '.. • . . . ',.. . • ' • • . ;.�:«,:." . , . , 3. Landscape Plan . �. - . � =""`�, ' M,, ., . �� 4. Grading Plan ., . ..: .. _ ._.., . . •- -� - . . ' :°}�``9=`"''` ``- .. � :..�...,,�,...--.,,.` :«�. .. ` '?F�M- .-c � • ,� ..... . . :_ . _. . . . ... _. . .....'.'... . ' ' . , . .. : ,"�:.��..�.:• �e. :�., . „. .. , .i • .. ' c: . `.:•;. �,4,'d;`�:C,'� , •; �'.. , . . B. Applications involving a Rezoning, ° Conditional Use Permit or Subdivisiori `;'�,v,:'_ :; ,::;�:.::; - � ; shall aubmit the following: ` �,k• •. .. p•` =:<°a";��',,;: :•. - � j.�•. �::.� ,� ' , . •> . � �l . . , ' . 't i ':1:•,�,� ,:� :�St$.'i:,,.,'' .�.: • . . -�: , . :...:rl'3.',qi� �. . � ' • 1. Sketch Plan ".. ,,;, ., � . . . .�. ,� r..:, - .� - ... . � � � ., .�'>.•�i�;=;r�;Y�;� � -;,=. . . .; . . �;,. .. . ..�o:�..�_.t>': �,; .: ., �. .:•. �,":r�:bi�,,; -�:.:•�.. _ : v�.::, � 2. �Abstractors Certificate � : � � ' � '• _.^".,. �' ' • � ��"_`��:�;�#;:�' '�''�" • • � , � :. ,:�>:�:,. :. �.,;,:-,," : •.:.r° � (If the subdivision� involves��cutting:of..existing parcel into two or. more�lots).s;��;.:'`�`:� ' , . . . . � , ..., e. 'r ' . � . . r, ; P: `; �'`'-�.t„ - :' < � ��.. - ',.�.:.. _. . .. _..; .. . ' ; ' �ili�2�.: � i,s±' � ' C. 'Applications involving a Wetlands Permit shall��,submit the following: %`'��'•�:` ';'�''"'' ;.T;•: . . =1. � =t, � :'_:„' • . ..,. • • � r� �`�•$ ,• �,". «'�L".�`• , . - r•.: ; f• -: '�, � ' . ..�-... . .. . . . . '. . �: •. .� ��%- J i�•��5, 1. A full & adequate description of all phases of the operation &/or proposed,;s;;^�;� ,.,, v : physical changes. , _ , ...._ _ ' ._... . _ .. . ,.;. '''•'' ..;� . . . - . . `• �,;r., . . ,; . 2. A topographic map of the area. . Contour intervals shall be drawn at two; (2),��',,,,' " ' foot intervals at a horizontal , scale of 1" = 1,000' or larger. ' �%�''"'',° "' ''-�{": , • . . ..._. .. . • . �:. � . � 3. A detailed site plan of the proposal showing proposed drainage, grading & landscaping 4. A site design map showing the location of existing and future man-made features within the site and to a distance of five hundred (500) feet surrounding the site. 1011 Nicollet Mall Minneapoiis, Minnesota 55d03•2491 fi12t338-8741 fAX 672133&•4840 Amer+can Institute of Architects National Society o! Protessiqnal �ngineers An Equat dppartunity Emptayer Setter, i,each & Lindstrom Inc. Architects Engineers Plan�ners June 29, i989 City Councii City af Mendota Heights City Hali 11Q1 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 RE: Thomas Irvine Dadge Nature Center Vi.sitars Center West St. Paul, Minnesota Dear Council Members: The Thomas irvine Dodge Nature Cen�er, loca�ed in West S�. Faul, will be a place far residents to experience the sights and saunds of nature. The Center's emphasis has been on enva.ronmental education with a program that serves 3Q,OQ0 student visits annually.� This large student base has generated an additional 14,000 adult trips each year. The 155 acre "Lilly" property in M�ndota Heights, was chosen as the site on which to create a new £acility and program to stimulate and accararnadate walk-on visits by adults and families. The new faci].ity wi11 be located adjacent xighway 110 with vehicular access fram Delaware Avenue and Dodge Larie. The 50 car parking lot is located to meet Minnesota's Departmen� af Transportati.on's (I�IDOT's) limited access standards for Highway Z10 and wi11 be shaped to follaw the edge of an adjacent grove of trees. Emergency access wi11 be directly �rom the highway, but �enced and de-emphasized to prevent pubiic use and congestion. �'he path from the parking iat to the bui3ding will pass through the grove of trees and over a wooden bridge that crosses a stream, providing visitors with an appropriate transition from the surrounding suburban/freeway context to the bucolic quality of the Nature Center. The buil.ding accen�.uates that transition wit.h the entry side made primarily of stone and the oppasite "view" side compased mos�ly of glass. Fathways wii3 be deveiaped to extend the new program thraughou� �tte property. The new building will cantain a 126 seat auditor3um, a classraom and a seminar space, all clustered around �a large exhibit area that �aces an outdoor am�hi�heater. Staff offices will be located above the main floor and a workshop will be lacated in the basemen�. The building will have a wood structure and will be clad in stone, glass and waod shingles. e � lgz�.oal.al-1 �u�� 2�, isss Page a �ind raising �or the praject is curren�ly underway. Zt is hoped that constructian will begin in the Fall af 1989, ar the Spring of 1990. We believe this facility will be an exciting new project and an amenity for residents of the City of Mendota Heights. V trul your , � � Mark Schatz Architect j�h tP-'1? xc: Jim Malkowski ... � � Ed renet�e, AIA Project Manager � CTTX OF MENDQTA HEIGHTS 1 NOTICE OF HEARING �N APFLICATI�N FaR CQNDITI4NAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELQPMENT July 7, 19$9 T(? WIi�M IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commissian o� the Cit�r of Mendota Heights will meet a 7:45 p.m. an Tuesday, July 25, 1989, 3.n the City Hali Ccruncil Chambers, 11Q2 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, to consider an appiication fram Dodge Nature Center ior a canditional use permit for a planned unit develapment to construct an interpretive center on the follawing described property: The SE 1/4 of the 5W 1f4r and the NE 1/4 of the SW 1j4, �xcep�. the west 390 feet of the eas� 599.5 feet except the South 56I.5 feet thereof, and; the NW 1j4 of the 5E 1f4; all in Section 25, Township 28, Range 23; and: Lats 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26, Gler► Toro, except Delaware Hills, and except �he lands described at Nos. 1 and 2. More particularly, this land is lacated South of trunk Highway 110 West of Delaware Avenue and East af Mendota Plaza and 2dor�h of Copperfield. This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota �ieights Ordinance Na. 401. Such persans as desire to be heard with reference to the propased conditional use perrnit will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS N�TICE OF FiEARING ON APPLICATION FOR CONI7TTIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT July 13� 1989 TO WHOM TT MAY CONCERN: NOTZCE is hereby given that tYie City Council af the Gity af Mendata Heights will meet at 8:45 P.M., or as soon thereafter as passible, on Tuesday, August 1, 19$9� in the City Hal1 Cauncil Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, to consider an application from Dadge Nature Center for a canditional u�e permit far a planned unit develapment to construet an interpretive center an the foilowing described property: The SE 1.j4 of the SW 1j4; and the NE 1j4 of the SW 1/4, except the West 390 fee� of the east 599.5 feet except the South 561,5 �eet th�reof; and ; the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4; all in Sec�.ion 25, Township 28� Range 23l and: LOtB �.5r 16r �.7j 18r 19r 24� 22f 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26, G].en Toro, except Delaware Hills, and except the lands described at Nos. 1 and 2. More particulariy, this land is lacated South of Trunk Highway 110 West of Delaware Avenue and East of Mendo�.a Plaza and North af Copperfield. This notice is pursuant to City o� Mendota Heights Ordi.nance No. 401. Such person,s as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed conditional use permit will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk � ' r j�`✓�i�t i � July 25, 19E9 To: Members of the Planning Commission, City of Mendota Heights From: William J. Hodapp and Barbara J. Hodapp This siatement is provided in response to the notification af a meeting concerning the application by the Dodge Nature Center for a conditional use permit to construct an � interpretive center on land described in the notice of hearing dated July 7, 1989. Let it be known that we have no objection to the development of the interpretive center by the Dodge Nature Center. VJe do, however, have serious objections to the plans to use Dodge Lane as the access road to the �arking lot - for the interpretive center. The basis for our objections can be stated as follows: 1) When we purchased our lot in 1979 it was with the understanding that Dod�e Lane would remain a graveled road unless all property owners a.greed that it should be upgraded. As a graveled road it coordinates well with the primitive design of the nature center. If the raad were to be used as the primary access road to the nature center, there is little question that it �t1ould have to be paved. It is our belief that this would be a breach of faith with us as property owners on Dodge Lane. We purchased our lot because of its bucolic nature with assurances that further development would be restrained by restrictive covenants. We do n.ot feel that the building of an interpretive center breaks that covenant, but the tremendous increase in traffic on Dodge Lar,e would clearly destroy the very reason that we purchased and built on our lot. As a side effect, the value of our lot wouid be significantly decreased by such development. 2) From the standpoint of safety, the use of Dodge Lane as an access road makes it even more important to consider other alternatives. The entrance to Dodge Lane is in such close proximity to Highway 110 that- access and egress are currently a dangerous adventure. The explosion in growth south of Dodge Lane has caused an ex�onential growth in traffic. Those of us w•ho live on �?odge Lane understand how dangerous it is to enter ar leave Delaware Avenue and take appropriate precautions. With an additional 50 to 150 cars per day using Dodge Lane, all driven by svangers to the road, the risk of vaffic accidents makes its use as an access road completely unacceptable. We strona:y encourafie you to reject the use af Dodge Lane as an access road for the interpretive center parking lot and to consider other alterna�ives. �� t+ '- July 25, 1989 Mayor Charles Mertensotto and Members of the Planning Commission Please let the record show our concerns regarding the proposed construction of an Interpretive Center by the Dodge Nature Center on property as described in the Notice from the City of Mendota � Heights dated July 7, 1989. Please also let the record show we are not against the idea of the Dodge Nature Centers proposal, except as it relates to the use of Dodge Lane as an access road to the interpretive center. We cite the following reasons for our objections: 1) Dodge Lane is not engineered to carry a great deal of traffic. The implication was made that it was constructed to serve the four homes that are currently using it. Because of limited use, the gravel road in its present condition serves us well. We are concerned about the condition of the road when buses travel over it. Without paving the road, the dust problem would be unbearable with increased traffic. So it is rather obvious that the road would need to be upgraded. We are not in favor of bearing any additional costs. 2) The entrance/exit from Delaware onto Dodge Lane would be hazardous for greater amounts of traffic because of its proxinity to Iiighway 110 and the hi11 on Delaware. 3) The proposed parking lot for the center has space ior �0 vehicies. If more parking is needed, we assume cars would be lined up and down Dodge Lane. 4) We purchased the property because there would be a maximum of four homes, and no further development on Dodge I�ane. This tranquility wa.s the maj or fac-tor in deciding to build our home on this site. Traffic to this Center will change this cruiet lifestyle_ Paul & Judy Rhein 522 Dodge Lane Mendota Heights, MN. 55118 i e Dear Mr. Malkowski: C lty O� 1Viendota Heights February 2, 1990 Your application for a CU� ��- � l•� 1.� , will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, � b� �� The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. The Planning Commission recommended �p(�rava-1 co��'�� j V� 0.C.C.�55 2� �a-�/' '�l�v� �6�c� �V�_ _ If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, (C.`,,-,1, • L_- Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 Jantzary 31, 1990 TO: Mayorr City CaunciZ, City Adminis�.rator FROM: K3.ayton Eckles Civil Engineer SU&TECTt Wagon Wheel Trail Fea�ibi2ity Iiearing (continuation} Job 8$16 Improvement 88 Project 7 DISCUSSION At the December 3J 1989 meating Cauncil continued discussion of i�he upgrading of Wagon Wheel Traii during the public hearing. The hearing was continued for a secand time; Cauncil asked Staff to loak at haw much land acquisition would be required in order to construct the wider street. Council alsa asked Staff to 3ook at the legal aspeets of ailawing deferments on large tracts of land. Sta�f has examinecl the two sectians of Wagan Wheel where additional Right o�' Way will b� required. The sectian of Wagon Wheel which lies west of 35E currently has only 50 feet of right of way. Therefore an additional 10 feet must be acquired'in order to meet MSA standards. Although there are 2 hames that are fairly close to the existing road {both 1065 and 1057 have anly about 25 �oot setbacks from the property Iine}, �he road can be offset to the oppasite side o� the street sa that na R.O.W. will be needed in frant of these hames. Then the road can be curved to the north in order to avoid any R.O.W. acquisi�ion in front of 2250 to the south. The attached drawing shows an approximate layaut that could be used to avaid any encroachmen� in frant af these homes. Everything on the east side of 35 E. has plenty o£ ex�.ra set- back distance, so the small portian where more R.O.W. is naeded will not create hardshi�as an any of the property awners. Staff incltzded signif�cant dollar amounts for land acquisitian in the cost esti.mates, so all the original estimates still stand. The second issue that Staff was directed to examine was the legal questions surrounding partial deferment of assessments. Tom Hart has looked at our current in-p].ace assessment policies which were used ta prepare the feasibility report, and informs us that these policies are not based on firm legal ground. In other words, our curren� poiicies most likely would not hold up iri court. Far the Wagon Whee3 praject this means that the original proposal to allow property owners to defer part o�' their assess�nents if they receive no immediate benefit has no legal � basis. Thus, if we want to keep our assessment procedures in line with state law, we should not allow any partial assessment deferments. We could still allow total deferments on a parcel, and allow deferments to retired persons. But unless Council wants to proceed with a policy which would very likely not hold up in court, our partial deferment proposal is not feasible for this project or any other proj ect . It should be noted that the city has never been challenged on this issue in the past, and Staff sees very few situations that might arise where the city would be challenged. This aspect of assessment law is unfortunate because if it is adhered to, it puts heavy pressure on medium size parcel owners to subdivide or it forces the City to allow total deferments on these parcels. The area along Wagon Wheel has many of these medium size parcel owners; Staff counted 10 lots that have between 200 and 300 feet of assessible frontage. OUESTIONS TO RESOLVE The following questions reiterate the questions in the , original feasibility report and add questions which have come up since the report was presented. * Considering Wagon Wheel is not in urgent need of reconstruction, is the MSA project warranted at this time? . * If the street and trail project is ordered, should the Decorah-Dodd intersection be realigned and upgraded? * If the project is ordered should the proposed Rehabilitation policies be used for determining assessments? * If the project is ordered and assessments are levied, should partial deferments be allowed on large parcels despite the legal opinions against such practices? RECOMMENDATION The upgrade of Wagon Wheel Trail to MSA standards, including the trail and intersection realignment, is both technically and financially feasible, and should be constructed at some time, however Staff currently has no opinion as to when it should be completed. : �� • .,;, ACTION REQUIRED If Council�decides to proceed with the project Council should pass RESOLUTION 90- , RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET, STORM SEWER AND PEDESTRIAN/BIKE TRAIL ALONG WAGON WHEEL TRAIL (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. 7) NOTE: PLEASE BRING YOUR COPY OF THE WAGON WHEEL FEASIBILITY REPORT OR CALL ME IF YOU NEED A COPY � City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. 89- RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEP�NT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET, STOR.I�i SEti�iER AND PEDFSTRIAN/BIKE TRAIL ALONG WAGON WHEEL TRAIL (INIPROVEMEPIT N0. 88, PROJECT N0. 7) ti�iHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 17th day of October, 1989 at 8:00 o'clock P.M. in the City Hall of the City of Mendota Heights, r4innesota pursuant to resolution duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota. Heights on the question of the proposed construc- tion of the following described improvements: The construction of a storm sewer system including appurtenances and incidental thereto and the acquistion of easements, in and for the area hereina.fter more particularly described. The construction of street improvements consisting of the acquisi- tion of easements and the grading, stabilization, drainage and bitumi- nous surfacing, and the construction of concrete curbs and gutters on the streets to be situated in the area hereinafter more pa.rticularly described. The construction of a pedestrian/bike trail on the north side of Wagon Wheel Trail. �VHEREAS, due publication of the notice of public hearing on said pro- posed construction has been attended to; and WHEREAS, mailed notice of said hearing has been mailed more than 10 days before the date of said hearing to the owners of each parcel situated vaithin the area proposed to be assessed, a�' in �.ccordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutesy and jnTHEREAS, the City Engineer reported that the proposed improvement and construction thereof were feasible and desirable and further reported on the proposed costs of said improvements and construction thereof; and WHEREAS, the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is situated �,rithin the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota and is more pa.rticularly described as folloi,rs: Abutting properties along Wagon Wheel Trail from Dodd Road to Lexington Avenue. WHEREAS9 the City Council then proceeded to hear all persons interested in said improvement and all persons were afforded an opportunity to present their views and objections to the making of said improvements. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Citj� Council of the City of A4endota Heights, hiinnesota as follows: 1. That it is advisable, feasible, expedient and necessary that the City of Mendota Heights construct the abave described improvemen-�s, and it is hereby ordered that said impravament be made. 2. That the City Engineer be and he is hereby authorized and directed to prepaxe plans and specifications far said improvement. 3. That said improvemen�G shall hareafter be �iown a.nd designated as Improvement No, 88, Praject No. 7. Adopted by the Ci.-t,y Council af the City of Mendota Heights this 6th day of �`ebr.uar•y, 1990. CITY C4UNCIL CITi OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTFST: Ka hl.een M. Swa.nson City Clerk January 30, 1990 Subject: Street Construction Wagon Wheel Trail Job No. 8816 Improvement No. 88, Project No. 7 Dear Resident: At the December 3rd City Council meeting the hearing on the upgrading of Wagon Wheel Trail was continued to the February 6, 1990 meetinc�. It was continued so that City Staff could examine two issues in more detail. The two issues which needed further review included the impact the road would have in areas where the homes were close to the street, and also the state law regarding the city's ability to allow some property owners to defer the payment of some of the assessments. Staff surveyed and designed the proposed street west of 35E and found that a street can be installed without decreasing the distance between the existing homes and the edge of the street. This was accomplished by angling the street layout. For those residents living west of 35E. I've included a copy of our proposed design. The second issue which caused the tabling of the public hearing was the issue of deferring assessments. It has been city S policy to allow property owners with large parcels to defer payment of portions the property assessments under certain conditions. Staff was of the impression that some of the parcels in this area might meet the policy cdnditions. Unfortunately, the city attorney has determined that it may not be within the state law for the city to permit these deferments. Therefore it may not be possible for the City to grant partial deferments. This issue will be up for further discussion at the February 6th meeting. Hopefully the debate over the upgrade of Wagon Wheel can be settled one way or the other at the February 6th meeting. I encourage you to attend it. The hearing is scheduled for 8 P.M. If you have any questions before the meeting please contact me at 452-1850. Sincerely, Klayton H. Eckles, P.E. Civil Engineer � i= 3 SHERMAN WINTHROP ROBERT R, WEINSTINE RICHARD A. HOEL ROGER D.GORDON STEVEN C.TOUREK STEPHEN J. SNYDER HART KULLER DAVID P. pEAR50N THOMAS M. HART �V DARRON C.KNUTSON JOHN A.KNAPP STEPHEN B.YOUNG FRANK A_TAYLOR MICHEIE D. VAILLANCOURT DAV I D E. M ORA N� J R_ DONALD J. BROWN JON J, HOGANSON SANDRA J. MARTIN GARY W. SCHOKMILLER TODD B. URNE55 SCOtt J. DONGOSKE PETER J.GLEEKEL ROBERT 5. SOSKIN EDWARD J. DRENTTEL JEFFREY W. COOK DANIEL C. ADAMS JEFFREY R.ANSEL JEFFREYN.SAUNDERS W I N T H R O P & W E 1 N S T 1 N E ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 3200 MINNESOTA WORLD TRADE CENTER 30 EAST SEVENTH STREET SAINT PAUL,MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE 16�21 290-8400 DIRECT DIAL 290-8481 February 2, 1990 Mayor and City Council of City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota the 55118 LAURIE A. KNOGKE WILLIAM F. MOHRMAN LLOYD W. GROOMS JULIE K. WILLIAMSON MARKT.JOHNSON BETSY J. LOUSHIN BROOKS F POLEY PATRICIA I. REDING JULIE W. SCHNELL TIMOTHY R. DUNCAN CHRISTY JO MAKINEN THOMAS H. BOYD JOSEPH C.NAUMAN DANIEL C. BECK ERIC J. NYSTROM BRIAN J. KLEIN KRISTIN L.PETERSON JOANNE L MATZEN TIMOTHY K. MASTERSON EVAN D. COOBS THOMAS A. WALKER GINA M. GROTHE E.JOSEPH NEWTON PATRICK W. WEBER CHARLES A.DURANT FAX 16121292-9347 Re: Street, Storm Sewer and Pedestrian/Bike Trail Project/ Wagon Wheel Trail (Improvement No. 88, Project No. 7) Dear Mayor Mertensotto and Members of the City Council: As City Attorneys for the City of Mendota Heights, we have been asked to render an opinion as to whether in the case of certain larger parcels of real property abutting a proposed public improvement project, the City Council legally may assess the cost of the proposed improvements at a pre-determined amount per foot of frontage against a portion of each such parcel while deferring the assessment (or the payment thereof) against the remainder until such parcel is subdivided. We have reviewed the relevant provisions of Chapter 429 of the Minnesota Statutes, as amended, and relevant case law and Opinions of the Attorney General interpreting said provisions, as the basis for the opinion hereinafter expressed. In rendering this opinion, we have assumed that the City Council has followed or will follow all of the procedures set forth in Chapter 429 of the Minnesota Statutes in order for it to be able to properly levy assessments against the properties abutting the proposed improvements. I. STATEMENT OF FACTS Pursuant to a Resolution dated December 6, 1989, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, ordered that certain improvements be made along Wagon Wheel Trail. These improvements include the following: � Mayor and City Council of the City of Mendota Heights February 2, 1990 Page 2 1. The construction of a storm sewer system; 2. The construction of street improvements consisting of the acquisition of easements and the grading, stabilization, drainage and bituminous surfacing, the construction of concrete curbs and gutters on certain streets; and 3. The construction of a pedestrian/bike trail on the north side of Wagon Wheel Trail. In order to help defray the costs of these improvements, City Council proposed that abutting properties along Wagon Wheel Trail from Dodd Road to Lexington Avenue be assessed. Id. The amounts assessed against the owners of the subject parcels of real property would amount of approximately $24.57 per foot of frontage. See Feasibility Report for Wagon Wheel Trail Upgrade to MSA Standards, Job No. 8816, Improvement 88, Project 7 (September 14, 1989). Apparently, some of the parcels of subject property have a considerable amount of frontage along Wagon Wheel Trail. See, e•q• Letter of Phyllis and Scott L. Miller dated November 28, 1989 (300 feet of frontage). Therefore, the proposal was made to assist the property owners of certain larger parcels by currently assessing for only 100 feet of frontage for these parcels and deferring assessment of the rest until such parcel is subdivided. Presumably, owners of the "smaller" parcels of real property would be fully assessed for the improvements based upon the defined amount per foot of frontage. II. ISSUE Whether in assessing the owners of property abutting certain improvements, the City Council legally may make current assessments against only a portion of certain larger parcels of property and defer assessment on the remainder until said parcels are subdivided. III. DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Section 429.051 of the Minnesota Statutes provides for and governs the apportionment of costs of local improvements and provides that the cost of any improvement, or part thereof, may be assessed upon property benefitted by the improvement. Section 429.051 also specifically provides that a municipality may defer the levy of special assessments in connection with water, storm sewer, or sanitary sewer improvements. The Section, however, does not address whether a municipality may currently assess certain Y� Mayor and City Council of the City of Mendota Heights February 2, 1990 Page 3 portions of affected portions and defer the assessment on the rest of the parcels until a later date. An Opinion of the Attorney General interpreting Section 429.051 of the Minnesota Statutes discusses the issue at hand directly. In Opinion 387-b-1 (September 19, 1966), the Attorney General addressed the situation where the White Bear City Council wished to assess benefitted properties for the cost of storm sewer improvements. The problem was that certain of the parcels, because of their size, were such that individual assessments would be excessive. The city attorney asked the Attorney General whether the city council could legally assess at the pre- determined amount per square foot against a portion of each of these "large" parcels and defer assessment against the remainder until certain contingencies regarding development of the properties occurred. Id. In its opinion, the Attorney General noted that a review of Chapter 429 of the Minnesota Statutes failed to disclose any authority, either express or implied, for the City Council under those facts, "to levy the proposed assessment against, the portion of each benefit parcel of land within the assessment district and defer the balance of the assessment against the remainder of each parcel until a future date." Id. (emphasis in original). Based upon a prior opinion, the Attorney General concluded that the City could not legally assess a portion of the parcels and defer the assessment against the rest, specifically noting that "property cannot be specifically assessed piecemeal for one and the same improvement." Id. at 2(quoting Opinion of Attorney General 387-b-1 (April 30, 1965). Minnesota Statutes 429.061, Subd. 2 does authorize deferral of payment of the first installment of any assessment levied upon unimproved property until a designated future time or event (such as the platting of the property or construction of improvements thereon). In 1980, the Minnesota Supreme Court held in Anderson v. City of Bemid�i, 295 N.W.2d 555 (1980) held that under similar facts, a city was not authorized by the above statute to defer one half of a special assessment on a large parcel until a later date. The Court held that once the assessment is levied against a parcel and once the first installment is paid, the entire assessment should in fact be paid in regular installments. In March, 1981, the Minnesota Attorney General again addressed the same issue under similar facts as that presented to the City Council, and again reached a similar result. The Minnesota Attorney General opined that Minnesota Statutes Section 429.061, Subd. 2 does not allow a city council to defer payments of special assessments for local improvements levied against unimproved property when the first installment of each assessment has already been paid. '�. Mayor and City Council of the City of Mendota Heights February 2, 1990 Page 4 Although the Attorney General indicated that "policy reasons can no doubt be advanced for a less restrictive approach, such policy reasons have not been adopted into law." While we believe an argument can be made that larger parcels, especially those which are capable of subdivision, are in effect multiple parcels, the above authorities seem to hold directly to the contrary. Therefore, it would appear that if the parcels are actually subdivided, the assessments could be deferred on the unimproved properties. Nevertheless, since the parcels are now, for legal purposes, deemed to be a single parcel regardless of size, deferral of a portion of the assessment is inappropriate. Very truly yours, WINTHROP & WEIN TINE B Th mas M. Hart TMH/ j 1 • y r�n : � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works D re o SUBJECT: Mendota Heights Conditional Use Case No. 90-02 DISCUSSION• Animal Hospital Permit January 31, 1990 The Planning Commission at their January meeting conducted a public hearing to consider a request from Dr. Tom Koepke to expand his animal hospital (see attached staff inemos). There was no public in the audience. One of the concerns expressed by the Commission at the hearing was parking. There have been no problems with parking for the hospi- tal and inasmuch as this expansion does not propose to expand his operation, no problems are expected in the future. The concern was, if the facility should be sold for another use. Dr. Koepke explained that because of the uniqueness in the building's design it is highly unlikely that it would ever be used for anything other than an animal hospital. He did go on to say that he was attempting to acquire more land from Mr. Birch and that land could be used for parking. Mr. Birch is unwilling to sell additional land at this time. Commissioner Tilsen felt the driveway entrance should be moved to be 10 feet from the east property line. Howard Dahlgren did not agree that this would be a good modification but as a compromise Commission- er Tilsen agreed to let the driveway be moved as far east "as possi- ble". Commissioner Dreelan wanted the structure to look as residential as possible. Commissioner Dugan had noticed a requirement in the ordinance requiring a precast roof. Howard Dahlgren said that was for noise abatement and that a wood roof could be designed to abate the sound as well as a precast concrete one. RECOMMENDATION• The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the animal hospital to expand according to the plans submitted, subject to the following conditions: l. The building be designed to look residential in character. 2. The driveway be moved easterly as far as possible. ^A The Planning Commission also recommended waiving the requirement for a precast roof. ACTION REOUIRED: If Council desires to implement the Planning Commission recommen- dation they should pass a motion approving a Resolution No. 90-_, RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MENDOTA HEIGHTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL allowing Dr. Koepke to expand his animal hospital according to the plans submitted subject to the above listed condi- tions. JED:dfw ,�� City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 90- RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MENDOTA HEIGHTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL WHEREAS, Dr. Thomas Koepke has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to expand his animal hospital located at 1938 Dodd Road in Mendota Heights; and WHEREAS, the required public hearings were held at both the PLanning Commission and City Council levels without any reasons for not allowing the development being brought forward. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that a conditional use permit be granted to Dr. Thomas Koepke of the Mendota Heights Animal Hospital subject to the following conditions: • 1. The final design of the building be designed to look resi- dential in character. 2. The driveway be moved as easterly as possible. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 6th day of February, 1990. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk 0 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO January 16, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Work tor Kevin Batchelder, Administrative istan �u3 SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-02, Mendota Heights Animal Hospital CUP for Animal Hospital Expansion (Public Hearing) DISCUSSION Dr. Koepke, owner of the Mendota Heights Animal Hospital, is applying for a conditional use permit in order to build an addition to his animal hospital. The existing building is operating as a conditional use and, in addition, has a variance to the parking requirements. Staff comments on the addition are as follows: 1. 2. Parkinq Variance The existing building has nine parking stalls and the new addition proposes to add nine more stalls. (Forty-two (42) stalls are required, the calculation is the same as for an office building). There has not been a parking problem at the hospital in the past and they are not proposing to increase their activity. It would seem reasonable to continue Dr. Koepke's parking variance as there have been no problems. Drainaae Dr. Koepke proposes to install a culvert under Freeway Road to carry away excess drainage from his pond located in the northwest corner of his site. This solution is satisfactory to the City staff. ACTION REQUIRED Conduct the the City Council addition and the requirement. JED/KLB:kkb public hearing and make a recommendation to concerning the proposed CUP to allow the 24 stall variance to the parking ^F �� t; PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: � ACTION REOUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 23 January 1990 90-02 Dr. Tom Koepke Southeast Corner Through Freeway Road and Dodd Road (see sketch) Approval of Conditional Use Permit • for Expansion of An Animal Hospital (Veterinary Clinic), Variance to Parking Requirements � 1. Or. Koepke has operated an animal hospital, clinic, and grooming service at this site in Mendota Heights for about the last fifteen years. About seven or eight years ago, there was an addition on the initial facility to provide living accommodations and a garage. Dr. Keopke resides on the site. as a single person. He notes in a rece�t conference that he "devotes his life to the operation of his practice". Such a residential facility is permitted for a staff inember on a 24 hour per day basis, limited to 620 square feet of floor space. 2. Attached is an excerpt from the Zoning Ordinance where "an animal hospital (veterinary clinic) is listed as a conditional use i� the B-2 District", which applies to the property in question. 3. The existing clinic is a single-story structure where the clinic occupies 5,860 square feet. Part of the facility (not included in the square footage noted) is a double garage. The proposal here is to add a two-story structure with a partial basement (for storage and utilities) with a footprint of 1,440 square feet. We u�derstand that the total square footage, including the basement to be added at this time, totals 3,200 square feet. 4. The additional land on which the addition is proposed to be built is part of the land division proposed by Brian Birch who owns the property to the north and east of the present clinic site. You will recall one of the concerns with respect to that subdivision was the ultimate use of the small triangular-shaped piece of property that he proposed to sell to Dr. Koepke. Thus, the proposed plans submitted now document the proposed use of the parcel to be added to Dr. Koepke's original site. The problem was that the small parcel proposed to be sold to Dr. Koepke is substandard as a separate site. In other words, unless the parcel was sold to DT. Koepke and added to his parcel, the proposed lot could not have been used by itself. 5. Attached are copies of the plan submitted by Dr. Koepke and his , architect, Frank Pattee. Because of the Martin Luther King holiday, we are reviewing drawings dated 1/8/90, which consist of six sheets . Dr_ Tom KQepke, Case No. 9tl-(l2 Page 2 indicating site plan, basemeni p2an, first and seeond floor plans, at�d elevations and sections. No landscape plan was submitted, though we recammended at aur staff rneeting with ihe applicants and his areF�itect that they prepare a landscape pl.an indicating the existing landscaping on the site pius ihe proposed landscaping on ihe new siie area. 6. You will �ote by exarnining the site plan, that the proposed addition has to buitt on the noriheast side of the existing structure, and will be built in such a fashion so as to create an open exterior courtyard approximately 20 feet by 65 feet. This courtyard wilt be used ia exercise dogs or their animals, but cannot be used for outside kennels, since these are prohibited specifically in the description of the Conditional Use Section 13.2(6)d. 7. Dr. Koepke notes that the main purpose of the • addition will be to provide for a relocatian of the grooming facility that is now in a portion of the original structure. The seco�d floor is used mainly for a kennel boarding area of approximately 28 individual kennel units for the boarding of cats. This function on the second flaar seems appropriate, except if one has to assume that such animals will be exercised outside. ihe enclosed interior courtyard is ai the first level. Perhaps some discussion of this with the applicant would be appropriate at the public hearings. 8. When the initial expansion was considered for the ariginal clinic, a second floor addition was proposed at that iime. There was considerable concern expressed about the apprapriateness of that cancept and was in fact noi appraved far that expansian program. The current proposal includes a substantial second flaor addition. With appropriate iandscaping {at maturity) the second floor addition may not be such a significant architectural feature. However, until such time as the landscaping is matured (assuming it is properly done in the first place), the second floor massing wili be obvious at the site. 9. There are existing single-family homes in ihe immediate area ta ihe north and west. These home owners may express some concern regarding the massing and height of the structure. The eievatians as presented by the second flaor additian can be readily examined on the fifth sheei of the drawings, The north elevation ir�dicates the appearance of the north side with a reguiar pattern af two rows af windows and the front fascade af the attached garage contiguous to Ghe easierly side of the building. You will nots that this attached garage has a 16-foot by ].2-foat overhead door. This garage is intended to be an arr�bulance entrance and presumably ihe ambulances will need a door higher than the normal 7-foot-residential averhead door. 10. The entire structure is to be built af brick with some exposed "texture 111" in the gabled ends of portions of the structure. The two-story bay window e2ement also on the north side of the siructure is praposed to be cavered with texture 111 plywood. We question somewhat the advisabiiity af the iexture Ill material since it is recognized as a cheaper material. If one excepts the concept of a two-story stcucture, ihe general massing and design of ihe buitding appears to be weil handled. The impact can be considerably reduced and mitigaked by the use of extensive landscaping, Dr. Tom Koepke, Case No. 90-02 Page 3 11. The original clinic has nine parking spaces, plus the indoor parking in the garage. The proposed addition will add an additional nine spaces. • Theoretically, the structure is supposed to have parking accommodation for the actual clinic areas equal to the amount of parking required if the structure were to be utilized for professional offices. If the clinic is ever ' abandoned, it is likely that such a structure would, in fact, be utilized for office purposes. 12. A variance was granted for the original clinic and addition, which according to this formula would have required more than the original nine spaces. The nine additional spaces proposed would accommodate theoretically 1,800 square feet of �additional office space (professional office space requires five spaces per 1,000 square feet). The adequacy of the proposed additional five spaces is related to the actual.'use of .. the structure and the number of visitors that frequent the premises. Dr. Koepke has noted in discussions with the staff that is in his opinion, the additional nine spaces will be more than adequate. We should note here that we suggested that additional par.king spaces should be provided on the site if possible. Revisions have have been made to the plans providing nine spaces rather than the original five spaces shown on the initial set of plans. 13. The site plan as discussed with the staff had the site largely asphalted to within 10 feet of the proposed new property line on the east side of the site. This produced a relatively large area of asphalt, but inadequate room to properly turn around a vehicle backing out of the garage (particularly a large one) and produced a good deal of asphalt area on the easterly side of the new structure, which cannot be officially used for parking. The bottom line is that some additional land in this area could be helpful in providing more parking capacity and a more efficient layout for garage access and egress. Our concern here is not so much through the use of the land while it is utilized by Dr. Koepke for an animal hospital and clinic, but the question of adequacy of parking in the event the structure is ever used for some other purpose. Based on examination of the final plans, we will attempt to determine the parking needs of the total structure if it were to be utilized for office purposes. This may be of some help in evaluating the use of the site and building as proposed. 14. In general, it seems that the expansion of the proposed use is appropriate. Areas of concern relate to: a) Resulta�t massing of the two-story structure; b) Adequacy of parking for alternative use; and c) Adequacy and appropriateness of landscaping to soften the building and provide screening to the nearby residential areas. ��'J_ti h . �`---=_= --=._�� . � � .�F ^ .. . _ _ � � �+. . •� f� Z $ � 3s `• , ..`,;:Q� ' . ". --N89�i6`00 . � a -�23..z - � o• � o . 6 : 4 3 '' o "a � �� N — ^ Z8B � 34C � `o' � p � 1 ! �� :� iD "�-�..�.��f ._. _ a '�� v..�. � {oR OET4it ' — � _ .._ 320.¢,5- r see Recoao pL�" N$`� 16' OG �E '�iL o 33 '�{ � s. Z 9� � t� � .f' � 'a � ¢'r 3 2 . •° �% a � � � � \_ z_ ,�C�� N Z3.x-G z z ,g � � e v ,q o 4� �'--� �� ti Z � { 3 � a S � � 30 4 �� v zt7.3 �� ! � a o' ss „n , � o i � o n � z 9 a- � —+�.° � � � 7 N J S' i1 f% i tl ^T' tQ ` / � p � — � Z,8 ,.' GS4. iS0 ( O �ti i ,� `,ti F2EEY�(AY SZOAp ��.� zf � z 1 �'0�! ':�. '�:;y�;:;:;:;::�:�:: die 3 � 2� c' 4dd.�:; r...::::• o � ° .S ..' :;;s.,`•'�, ». .: �� :i •y,�.;.•: : ° S ^ ' ' ' 4r': ::t: »:�,�., • ,, � %�iiO z �y ^�• O,y y�b� r'S�}�. Q ; . � � �':; �;b��.,►;':. ♦ Z � ~ 4� J 7 � .; '+�.�' P,LAC E Q. o �5�0�� fI/n�a F�sch�r- N � �° TG o �d S.t4�r9o2 \ P „�' 4 jQG. �' /71V0 r 7 z � s r. s, .. 4 �� a.r• eos � � a . a � � , � ,� , .y 3 ; a ..�� .w SUBJECT PROPERTY }o � 4' .L . ' +� Q �l� �� t 4 � V1 150 (2Y.dL 2 � �.i � y Za �� ti � E�.. �,y.oz NC�RTH ~� SCALE 1"=2tJ0' ,,, ¢ J �, zo j a , � N j o {'7 Z �. � a / /43,Z � ' . a`/ . O ,a ,�o,' h� .,: � S 1... U`� , ... `_ � � � .� � � �.�.�� _ ^ � — , �� ~�� 228.81 �� . h � S 89°44'25'�E �� ' /�'�`�----.� / `1g'o'hy'S S� ' . / q 11 � N 6 �,'9'pOO J 1 ; /q "y?t �p9oC�. � uisr�� 6'S , � � 3� O 25�� .w' � � F a-soo � ,� �" i � ''S90 v�h h� : '0 3 9, g ay. . � '°g•2s ,�i °soo ' "' �v r� fa .84 =. 2 5 `y� 22"E N � � � t � � m � a � _..�t�� }I � � ^ y. 13. 2{6) Animal. Haspitai (Veterinary C1.inic) . As used hereunder the term "Animal Hospital" ar "Veterinary Clinic" shail be deemed to mean a�acility for the diagnosis, treatment and medical care of small animals, in which ali professional services are conducted within an enclosed building and which excludes the kennel%ng of such animals except for the time periad nec- essary ta pravide medical care therefor_ Any conditianal use permit for an Animal Hospi�al (Veterinary Ciinic) shall be subject to the fallowing condi�.ions: 1. No noise from the operation of the faci.lity shall be discernible beyand the boundaries af �he lot on � which t�e use is conducted_ To achieve noise con- trol, the faciii�y shall be of masonry canstruction with outside walls at least 8" thick, and with a precast�cancrete roof. 2. Odor�controi shall consist of a venti.lation system designed sa that no odars or organisms will spread between wards ar to the outside ai.r. An air condi- tianing system may be reguired, with windows dauble glazed with fixed sash. ' 3. An apgroved sy'stem shall be provided for the storage and disposal of dead animals off the premises_� 4. Large dag faci.iities for indaar exercise of such animals shall be provided. No autside pens sha13. be permitted. ' 5. When abutting a residential dis�rict, an approved screening and iandscaping plan shall be filed and developed along the property baundary lines that abut the "R" District. 6. Haurs .at which the facility wil,l be open to the pubiic for the receiving and pick up of animals shall be app�aved by the Ci�y Council to insure � corzipatibility with surrounding ].and uses. (4Q1} 59 i' • 0 �. Off-street parking facilities shall be provided, of at i"east the ra�ia required for professional af€ic�s under Section 18 . 1(4 ) q of the Zoning Ordinance of one space far each two hundred {200) square feet of � . floor area i.n the builda.ng. 8_ An Animal Hospital may inciude a iive-in facility �.a permit a sta�ff inember �o be on the prernises 24 hours per day. Such �aci.lity shalZ be Ii.mited to 620 square feet of floor space and shall not be designed �o serve as a"sing3e-family residence" as hereinb.�fore defined in this Ordinance. _ 13.2(�} The saie and servicing of heating equipment, air conditioni.ng equir�men� and electrical appliances provided that �.here shall not be more than six persons employed upon said premises in the repai.r or servicing of said egi�ipment or appliances. J � _ C ity o� .,,1 � � � 1Viendota Heights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PI;ANNING REQUEST Case No. Q�-Q � Date of Ap licalion — - FeePaid� � •C}O 1 j�l ��5� Mendota Heights Animal Hospita? PH: 688-9245 (private line) Applicant Name: (Last) (F'u'st) (Mn 454-3558 (business pet line ) Address: 1938 Dodd Road, Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55I18 (Number 8i Street) (City) (State) (Zip) Owncr Namc: Koepke Thomas Edwin (�t) (F'ust) (Mn . 1938 Dodd Road, Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55I18 Address: (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) 1938 Dodd Road Strcet Location of Property in Question: Legal Description of Properiy: Einess Add � tion Section �t 1, Biock I. Dist 27 Plat 23370 Lot OIO Biock O1 PLUS new triangle lot from Birch Property Type of Request: Rezoning xxx Condilional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Plan Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicabic City Ordinancc Numbcr xxx Variance Subdivision Approval Wetlands Permit Other {attach explanation) Scc�ion Present Zoning of Property BZ Present Use B2 ti�ith conditional use plus empty lot B2 B2 wi�h conditional use (Iand raou}d be Proposcd Zoning of Property Proposed Use ee e w=� county to e one lo on y) I heneby declare that all statements made in this request and on �ie additional material are we. „�l . _ (Signature of Applicant) December 26, 1989 (Date) (Received by - Title) 1101 Vietoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452-1850 ; i •'� • �� M� do a�1 � i a o i � � g�� 1 �-I �gp a� • � •♦ Unlisted Phone: 688-9245 January 2, 1989 City of Mendota Heights II01 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55.Z18 , Dear City Staff, Langer Construction Company, the City Staff, and myself wi11 be meeting at 2pm on January, 8. Monday. I would like to present a few ideas in this Ietter'just so you have the opportunity to think about m� suggestions. I understand this meeting will not approve my building plans and is intended to make the city staff aware of what I would like to construct. DRAINAGE. The'northeast corner of Dodd/Freeway (my property) collects water from only my existing parking Iot and will collect runoff from the new parking area. The adjacent bu.i_lding, Tom Thumb, has its runoff water go north along Dodd to 110. However the city wants the water drainage done is ok with me. I have no knowledge of the overall city drainage plan or do I have any traininq as an engineer. ' I would Iike you to know, however, I am not really super interested in a large pond area. So if this is beinq done to please me - don't. A small area which is shallow might be necessary before the water goes through the proposed culvert under Freeway road. Not havi ng a pond would allow better landscaping. Grass and low plantswilZ be necessary due to traffic safety. CURBS. I would Iike to city to consider allowing me to place an asphalt curve along Freeway road adjacent to my property. My parking Iot will have cement curves. This would allow a nice landscape look. PARKING. I wiZl need to ask for a parking varience. My new building will move pet grooming from its existing position to the new structure. All there clients will enter from Freeway road. No other people will use the Freeway road entraance. A1Z veterinary and pet boarding clients will use the existing entrance off Dodd Road. I realize when you see the new structure it is large. But the second floor is alI cat boarding. One-third first floor grooming, one-third dog boarding, one-third animal hospitaZ. The several furnances, hot water heaters and utilities will be in the basement. It is my thought the traffic will be more split than at present. The new boarding of cat facilities will not cause parking lot con gestion. P. S. Mer�do�a �i �j�� ir�al �-Io�gpi�a� � FREEWAY ROAD GUARD WIRE. At the present time a retaining wire exists along the whole Iength of Freeway �.�t' • from Dodd to N/S Freeway Road split. Since I am fiZ.Zing in this Zand and ma� not have a Zarge, deep drainage pond at Dodd/Freeway I was wondering if the city would allow me to remove the quard wire adjacent to my property. The final grading of my new property will be one foot high er than it is at present. The slop off of Freeway Road to my property would be minimal. cc Langer Construction Company •.. ��R rin�t�. �nar�. Mo�.r�n�� -u�.inrl,'Fa Nii+.+,a.c�n�'o -ri�',1iR ��7.�1�'i"4��r'i �'i Q i F � �� • . • Me� do�a �-I�ig�� i �al � Wednesday, January Z0, I989 Dear Adjacent Land Owning Neighbors, I have purchased a triangular piece of property a the north side of my existing building. A stick marke blue ribbon is approximately the end of my new propert A straight line from the marker to the back storm fenc wi1l give you some visual understandinq of the triangu. piece of property on which I want to build an addition animal hospital. . EncZosed is a flat plan showing the animal hospital as it would exist after the addition. A. The pet grooming business wouZd be moved to a new expanded area with their entrance being from Freeway Road. The present parking area would serve only the animal hospital clients. B. The interior courtyard would be an exercise area for doqs. On a routine basis the Axisting parking lot fenced area would not be used for dogs. Basically, people wi1.Z not see dogs outside. I also feel this will reduce barking. The people visiting Tom Thumb often started the dogs barking. � C. Also included in the new addition wi11 be an isolation area for animals with contagious diseases (usua.Zly cats with respiratory problems�, an expanded radioloqy roon, additional surgery cages (18), a surqery prep room, a maintence workshop, a Zarge•garage to house a mobile veierinary van, an indoor exercise area (plus the outside courtyard) and cat boarding "condo's"(28). D. Although no external signs different from those already being used at the animal�hospital are planned this is a open question. Absolutely no larqe neon siqn but something with "class" miqht be considered if I really th ought of something. City approvaZ required AND I would personally share ideas with Kafka, Cochrane, Miller and Christopherson's. The city can confirm I have no proposals before them at the present time_ E. Landscaping like the existing style_ Traffic concerns wi11 have to be taken into account. The Zarge pond at the corner of Dodd and Freeway will not exist after the addition. F. The only variance required is a reduction in parking. This has been given to me in the past. With grooming moving to their own parking Zot and entrance I feel this will not be a problem. �v.. rn'L�.�f' ��' _,� /� - , � �� 4 • � � a��`j� � c- � �� ' • " • , ��' � � — =,T -- —� i`/t/ 1�'�R Tl,,,a.a 1�..e.� Mo«.a..�� ITrs.;ni.to �i�.+,a.nn�'o �S11R i^�'��ri ti'.Q .� L. -- - - -- - - - - � I I I I�I�I I 1 � � ' l i I i l l . , . , ., , . . � t•" a ti CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING January 4, 1989 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby give that the Planning Commission of the City of Mendota Heights will meet at 7:45 P.M. on Tuesday, January 23, 1990, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from the Mendota Heights Animal Hospital for a conditional use permit for an animal hospital addition in a B-2 Zone for the following described property: Lot 1, Block 1, Einess Addition and the 10,662.05 square foot triangle lot located immediately north that is currently being subdivided. More particularly, this land is the Mendota Heights Animal Hospital located in the southeast quadrant of Trunk Highway 149 (Dodd Road) and Freeway Road. This notice.is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed conditional use permit will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk � C ity o� : ,,,, l l, � 1Viendota Heights Dear Dr. Koepke: January 18, 1990 0 Your application for a�� V'�J'�ati�. , will be considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularl� �- 2Ku scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, ��c��n Zc�- . The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. KLB:kkb m Sincerely, �,e.�f�'�-- �Cc.''l�c'C.�-^'v'�`.. Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING January 19, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: 0, ,� NOTICE is hereby given that the� Council of the of Mendota Heights will meet at �5 P. ., or as soon thereafter as possible on February 6, 1990, in the City Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from the Mendota Heights Animal Hospital for a conditional use permit for animal hospital addition in a B-2 Zone for the following described property: City Hall an Lot 1, Block 1, Einess Addition and the 10,662.05 square foot triangle lot located immediately north that is currently being subdivided. More particularly, this land is the Mendota Heights Animal Hospital located in the southeast quadrant of Trunk Highway 149 (Dodd Road) and Freeway Road. � This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed conditional use permit will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk r� a Dear Dr. Koepke: C ity o� 1V�endota Heights February 2, 1990 Your application for a �1.� � �Or- a� °e�c��-�o.'V will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, �So- �� The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that yoizr application will receive Council consideration. � The Planning Commission recommended c�p p�-a v�- � 5 �� J e�'� �'p C�..�,b� � f-�� ,�,5 . If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ��-- �� Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO February 1, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrat FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works D re SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-01: Posthumus - Varianc DISCUSSION The Planning Commission, at their January meeting, considered a request from Mr. Bruce Posthumus for a 28.1 foot front yard setback variance (see attached staff inemos). The Posthumus' had recently received a CUP from the City to construct a garage on their lot and had gotten signatures of consent from all their contiguous neighbors. Their ' immediate neighbor to the east later withdrew their consent and a dispute broke out between them concerning the garage. Mr. Posthumus and that neighbor are now not on friendly terms and he had asked that the City contact them for their consent in this latest application. Staff has informed them that Council will be considering the matter at this meeting. Commissioner Tilsen had a concern that the house use would be exclusively for residential purposes not for more garage space. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the requested variance subject to the structure being built and used for residential purposes only. ACTION REQUIRED If Council desires to Commission's recommendation approving a 28.1 front yard Annapolis Street subject to JED:kkb implement the Planning they should pass a motion setback variance for 540 West the above stated condition. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO January 17, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrat've Assistant �4A� SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-01, Posthumus, Variance DISCUSSION Mr. Bruce Posthumus, 540 West Annapolis Street, recently was granted a CUP and variance to construct a free standing three car garage on his lot. Mr. Posthumus now desires to upgrade his existing house by constructing a second story addition (see attached letter and plans). His existing house is in a non conforming status because it is constructed at a 1.9 foot setback from the lot line. In order to allow this new construction, the house must be brought into conformance through the granting of a setback variance. ACTION RE4UIRED Consider a 28.1 foot front yard setback variance for 540 West Annapolis Street. JED/KLB:kkb : � ; ° " iC � . R . � ' PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ' ACTION REOUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 1. Members of the Planning Commission applicant's submission for approval of a setback of his attached garage at this months ago. Though he wanted to set hi street (approximately 20 feet), the garage 7 feet from the front right-of-way infringement on the view from the house east. 23 January 1990 90-01 Bruce Posthumus Between Annapolis Street and Fremont Street (see sketch) Approval of Variance to Front Yard Setback and Council will recall the variance to the front yard home site approximately six s garage back further from the was approved to be set back line so as to reduce the on the contiguous lot to the Mr. Posthumus now proposes to develop his site further by converting the existing garage to living space and adding a second floor addition. 2. Attached is a copy of the drawings illustrating this proposed expansion of an existing house. The house and garage was constructed many years ago and you will note that the existing garage is 1.9 feet from the front lot line. The applicant has submitted a series of drawings of the proposed structure a�d a site plan indicating the location of the existing house and the recently approved garage. The Ordinance requirement is 30 feet, therefore, the existing house is "nonconforming". Nonconforming means that though the structure may have conformed to regulations at one time, the dwelling does not conform to the current regulations. Any nonconforming use cannot be expanded unless the variance is approved removing the "nonconforming" status. Thus, Mr. Posthumus is requesting a variance to the front yard setback from 30 feet to the existing 1.9 feet, which is the setback of the original garage that he proposes to convert to living space. 3. There have been many instances in the northerly part of the City of Mendota Heights where such variances have been granted in the past. The lots were platted very small and, in many cases, the homes and/or garages were constructed very close to the lot lines. Fortu�ately, many home owners decided to buy a lot and a half, or sometimes two lots, of these original parcels. Many of these parcels varied in width from 50 to 60 feet. 4. Lacking some condition of which we are not aware at the time of this writing, it would appear that the proposal to expand and enhance the residence of the Posthumus family at 540 Annapolis Street appears to Bruce Posihurnus, Case No. 900Z a , Page 2 be appropriate and in the neighborhood interest. Attached is a statament of approval signed by neighbors in the immediate area. 5. As each of these older dwellings get renovated and in many cases expanded, ii appears that this older neigt�barhood is graduaily improving. Such older neighborhoods built in substandard fashion in some cammunities do in fact deieriorate over tirne. Thus, it seems Lhat in general, encouragement of the home awners to expand and enhance iheir investments on these residential sites is in the public interest» a �- 4 / 0 a� ^� - . ,'�� 40 . . :; .:T:.i -• so i �i o � L O � J " r � 4 .. . • :::C�: -:i•'r:; . .. « .. / � 2Gzz9 � P < �:=:: �::;=: ��,,. C \k,4i y�� (, C 3 At �.� II �� :�1d: :':��: d i G s 4 Z : 6 � Q(i Lo � 3 0 OCe ' Q' 4 V 40 . . . 4a J 20 �' � �'. �-e E o NT sr. � �t .�..o �. ,� . . . .. .. „� , a , ., . _ � SUBJECT PROPERTY •3 •2 . ' 9 � ' _ . S _ 3 NORTH � 4 = �� SCALE 1"-200' rz l3 l. z� z� r S s° . �PO '��` ; _ 33= ,�..� �w I. ` . ,=o � �� ti �'S� HIAWATHA ST : i! < < � J �7 � p iJ �� . � � \ !� ' � '+ /Q /J / Z i/ io 9� 7 C S 4 2 a � � �2tC � �+ c t � j � � ' i�� O . .. .. .. . 4• . lio �'1 � � . I �� 0 :. �.. � ya .. `v � c o �a ao �a �� o 7 �e /\ � 7 � G �` 4 J 2 �° 3 Il •� . �Cj $ r� � �/ 1' , N �6 W N N I�\ � � s0 . � :� ; \ � 9 � ST '� ` 7 .. \ ' Q 3 .s ' �o ��' i/ Cp Ir `.(i, 'Z Rs. 5 O �� D •�O �S 545 � 5 Ile �0' ( \J \ b \ �• te � \ /G 2 t� I<2.75 � � � � � J t A dT. �o Ao �.,�40 `o Q/ �1 G S 4 s i�t.G t [FFI.Ef� ANOREw 5 Z \ v � 15 7 ��%C�1S 2G232-t KVENEN �'� � � 'f ,S-o 4 � Z . 2at3L-d t/3 3 � � i•I r �� Lo � . lll - 9 �ors h �v � 's�a � — P� � 9 0 « � ' Q - \ /O� � � 7o t,• Szs � 9j /I " 4 � ti � t ` C• � �r., .. V co �3 M�e�q �- o ,S 3 y O �:., M ` � <<. • � � � , J�as �o .c �l ; n�o � y w � Jop , Z� . I.� � N / �/5 it �3 y � �� .. �a � 9 w d� �.� � �t*' ST . � � � L ,s� �z y �ssai �- � � � o �o .. . c. ,io � � o ..o`I zo>.zs ••6 so� aa Yo w Bo •do �o rao i o, . � S ° Z /� � z � 3 K p �1 ti .. � .. � � 4� `d'8 q %� G h S'0 4 3 /i 17 �O 3 � Q � : N � l0/7 � ti ��" � ^ - � � � �,�,• �z t• . N N _f2oQ3 4� 9 `x � kl � � tc �1.r <4i � . V �= � {,� CO '�G J9l{j• ,�ri� h � r�^. Q J i s- J Q' pt.Wt S`� �7� � Q� 00 ^ I o i e a y�V .i� : -. ' w ( s T� N �'� � � _ 2_ VP � i ; 7 i � �_ ec � ,t�.. T � � ' �s�� ct do '�sif ;..�� sm ico � is. V �9 . t� f 2G / [ �� u,Y o a�s� - .. .. .. s�s� � s � ,i � 4k. ai �s.�s v. p v o � , o � , � �•'' 4^� : ^� �, � o � � 0 s � ;,ti 9 a �o` ii b� /j /4�,� i i z 3 4 s� ��,� . � . � o � ti N \ i�s 4tct a 9.a4 ga 8 a 8a �o �a is7 .is �a 9a 2oc 3� ��'r� ' V � ' �.�ws o n� s r. n �t Sa• ` ` 5 Z � t '` "3, I � 4„ �� C. � �� •' css) ca �♦ 3 r Q' � i � • � •' vJ o t9l � v ,' S� ��o I � : o Mt 2 '!o / ; j 3 4 i }� ; � � e � & . �� ,.f .� ; � � s -�.• , " ', � � � s � �� ! � � � _ �� !� � ; i• C ity o� .�..�.� 1Viendota Heights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Applicant Name: � c�.��, � S� d Address: (Number & Street) Owner Name: o wm G� (� ) Address: � (Number & treet) Street Location of in Question: ��e DescripGon of Properiy: �� Type of Request: Rezoning Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Plan Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Numbcr Prescnt Zoning of Property _ Proposcd Zoning of Property Case No. q�' �� Date of Application �—�S -�C� Fee Paid 3S .00 FZe �� a3 N-sq �_PH: `7" .S � �'� � c� wo�k S'S 6- y�7.Z � O..t•1 ,�% . �..! /' c- � � o � CL�P) � �� (City) (State) (Zip) Present Use Proposed Use C. ,�, Variance Subdivision Approval Wellands Pennit Other (attach explanation) Section I hereby declare diat all statements made in this request and o e addidonal matcrial arc true. �� (Signature of Applicant) U L� � G (Date) (Received by - Title) 1101 Vietoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452• 1850 es January 11,1990 City of Mendota. Heights Mendota Heights, MN 55118 To: The Planning Commisaion, and City Council of the City of Mendota Heights This is to inform you of a request for a building code variance for my home at 540 West Annapolis Stree� The south wall of the house is presently one and nine tenths (1.9) feet from the lot line bordering �emont Stree� (City code requires a setback of tbirty feet) The variance is required to obtain a permit for constru.ction of a appro�mate 20 a 20 foot second story addition on the south end of the house. This part of the house has a attached garage with a flat roof. Our plan is to finish the firat floor as family room and second floor as bedrooms. The roof will be reconstructed over the center portion of the house and continue over the second story addition. It will be a more conventional roof line with a 4�]2 pitch having the gable end facing F�emont Street. I feel this will greatly improve the appearance of the property along with giving added living space. Provided for illustration are the site plan, floor plan, and sketches. Thank you for your consideration, Uo�'�� %'LG�l-w.:ii2 Bruce C. Posthumus attachments nd._i07 Bl.actc..x= :C.U:. Pierce!s.�.Ac3�di.�ian ta_ Sa�.nt.,_.Pa.ul, _ac�o�.di,ng�.ta_ . , w rded p}.a� �hereof on file in the office o� the County Recorder, � , ounty, Minnesota. , �� , i � / r� � .�, 1 — 2, o .. � � . _ . re � e�� a � ��o � s�� ; �` � � �� P . . . � .�'r�r�apo/!s � st� , . . . . . • o CONC. CUk'�' 7 ! • � � A/1 /i � �l . . • �• Z �' I P s��l"�'i��M+�T�r •�•�� a . .. af . . • � • � . • . i ' �� ' . . . . . ( . . aQ�� .. . . .. . . .. , � . . . , . .�. � .. Z . • Y • � • ` s � • ' �t- • V J • ( .. � . . ��! ti • � J.. y o � . . O� .. . . . � . . . . . ' 'n.� '. . . ,'v �'�s i ` o�. � v•....�. K.. � °vp �4� . � � �� . � ... . .o.� _ �� . . . . • o � . . .. �� ,1 _,_, � 5� ' �vo ... ` .. . �o � ' ^' �_.j. ,.._.. 3.� `. .__._. _. \ r' 1,1 ' � I a � � �' . . � � . � � ! w..� F-..« . � . . . . _ . , . . �,, -►#---v » ,+ 1 .. � .. • �� . . ,n ,o { , ;. �:� � �`� ( ia •S � `ti l '.� �A �'GLGa � -s � . o.S r . . . . o. f � . v�• � � %f o.t • . . , . . . . . . ..`.�,,,oa, 80.l.i� «, . . 4 � . � . ti. . � � [I2S'� CU,PB? • � Fremonf sf � a .5'e� �O''�ibn pi,ue /if �60f'9 . —Y—C�Soi� Ciirk fence --��—P�ckef Fence • January 10,1990 I, the undersigned, give my permission to the granting of a ae�back variance, to allow the construction of a second story on the south side of the house at 540 West Annapolis Street, Mendota Heights. Name J Address �y ,, �� ` , � 5 3 � �� v�. �'�,�oi-�- Hfs, t� ��l tJ ��r/� k �Z", �y' J�� f/ � ` LG• /i �'�2 � �y'.`-' v /L / ��`+' "- i �� /C. . � � w ��c�sT�N� �xfer��br Yi�c�S �f�=l0j ,.�.�.t.. � � !_. i ' .� _ _i��,,, �._,_„_._t. y_.L�__ ( t.. '_t_�#..i , -r_ �'� i -�-_ � .__.� _....��__ -�- -� � r ! • - -f i _.i.._ "�`'r"- �.. �' I_i._.1 � �._.�.._� -r—`-; �. --r�-� . i l�J tl i e' W't'Y p �n^ r�t a r 1�t ��,�a�oj�5' _s---! _ -_.�:.�! _ _.': i".+:,�-%-- , i . .7 . _ . , . , ' � _j_ •__.�... T.„ - - - t. _� ...�._1.�._l_.+-'1' _ ' �. . i � r � : ... • t• ; ��• � ` ..�_� � _... _.l. . • �/ ! � 1_f .� , r r l. _ 1._.� !T • j _ T" _ i _..,. (... .�. �. , � „, ,�_�� `r � r , _,_ ..I.... � , ._,. � � t ! t.. 3.. i. ! t_ i{_. t» ' ' I r _1... . f. . .f ��- �- �,% i!? �,r+ -h� v' o v►� � e u�� `� t,. �{'� 1.,.° N^c d tt �� V�� w' �r o w�. i.t1 e y-�` � � - � � �„ 5�� v►�+ o� J M a�n � - � � --r-----i -- , i � _.i__.. �... � . r , , � .... � �. � i 1' � �� ! .. i_. __� � � ! ' i � i 1 ! _... . i � � I � i � � � � j � �� I i 1 � � r � � 1 � � . � i . , � . 1 1 . / i' ' : . . . � • . , i • � i � , . �. . -4--� C-��,o�,�a��,� y ,,a �---..�3��-- ,.:, ., �. . ,. �r�-i % .� • - "._� � J � � > >• - � . _.-- •-.1._ --..�._.. � . _ . .. . T_1_ .. _ I . ! � .. � ----- . / � • . � � . _... i._ .__7_ � -•. • � .- • •� • •••i•--r � -- i• -�• -- ?- -' _3-._ T_ �s ��o��u�.�..�....---- ��ao�/ ti+�+o�� ma,� r� sr^�in ,+o►a��x�' )paSoda,�� V , o r =„ , �XiS�inCa ..� ICi rsT ��o o !� �i�o� P�a� se c o�.0' �/o o � s •, 1"= �' l0 � fi^lorf �, �ro�oSed� /-�oor P�a h �,'�s f �/o o,. � Se�o.c� �/oor e �- . Clty O� .�.. �. � 1Viendota i ieights January 30, 1990 Ms. M. Mortinson Ms. T. Meidlinger 538 West Annapolis Street Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Ms. Mortinson and Ms. Meidlinger: At the January 23rd Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed a requested front yard setback variance proposed by Mr. Bruce Posthumus of 540 West Annapolis Street. Mr. Posthumus is requesting a front yard setback variance to his existing house in order to construct a second story addition to his home. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval for the request and the matter will appear on the agenda at the February 6th City Council meeting. The Planning Commission also directed staff to contact you about this scheduled variance request, even though the matter does not require public notice. If �rou desire to be heard regarding this matter, your op�ortunity will be at the February 6th City Council meeting, which begins at 7:30 P.M. If you have questions about the plan, please contact Jim Danielson. Sincerely, ��.,�,�-�:--.. �-��-��,�-- Kevin Batchelder Administrative Secretary cc: Bruce Posthumus 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 � � �� a : � City o� .,,.1 j � 1Viendota Heights January 18, 1990 Dear Mr. Postl�umus: �� .� , Your application for a�.e'KoG-t-�- �fd-� cc�,1rLC�Q, , will be considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly„ scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday,c�Gc,ti- Z� � The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ��'l'�' Q� Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb � 1101 Victoria Curve -1Viendota Heights, 1VIN • 55118 452-1850 C ity o� .�,,�,� 1Viendota Heights February 2, 1990 Dear Mr. Posthumus: Your application for a�� .� �.e-rap�� %�-�'t c�.v�.c1L will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, �� (�,�' The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. • The Planning Commission recommended V�av.��.-.auS �y 'CI--�-� ��-�.e �*i��c� � 4' rz��-� a �(JYbv c..\ n� � �� :� � � ., I 'F'ib �lT i!A-rCT �.Q�� L� �f 0.�(" lO.,ti.CSL ` If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ��c_.�'. (3 �—.�—�,,�.., Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 Jarivary 31, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administrator FROM: Kla�ton Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Garron Feasibility Job No. 8420 Improvement No. 84, INTRODUCTION Report Update Proj ect 2 About 5 years ago Steve Gage of the Garron Corporation was developing a commercial site north of Acacia Cemetery. An extensive feasibility report was completed that examined utility service to the Garron Site and all of the areas surrounding the Acacia Cemetery. The feasibility report was accepted by the Council and plans were ordered for the project. Shortly after the plans were ordered, the project was put on hold by the Garron Corporation. No actions have been taken to develop the site since that time, until now. Steve Gage, now of Edge Commercial Real Estate, has requested that the City again begin pursuing utility service to the site. It has been over three years since the report was accepted and the public hearing closed. Therefore a new hearing is required. Since there have been a number of changes in the area in the past 5 years, the feasibility report should be updated. . The discussion in that have occurred original report is in the margins. DISCUSSION this report will be centered on the changes since the last feasibility report. The attached, and changes in it are included The original report includes discussion of four phases of construction. Phase One concerns the utilities for the Garron Site. Phase Two is the looped water connection, portions of which have already been constructed, and the remainder will be constructed as part of the State interchange project (scheduled for 1991-92 completion). Phase Three has already been completed as part of the Big Wheel project. Phase Four, the Furlong Addition, is discussed in separate memo. The overriding factor that affects all these phases of construction is the completion of the T.H. 13-110-55 interchange project. The interchange project has been on the drawing boards for more than 40 years, and there have been repeated false alarms of impending construction. This time however, it seems the project will be constructed as planned. The Mendota Bridge is to be reconstructed (with federal money involved), which means the interchange project must also be completed. The construction of the interchange project will mean our watermain loop will have to be built, Pilot Knob will have to be upgraded to MSA standards (after the county turnback), and the utility stubs and storm sewer stubs to serve the Lemay area will have to be installed. The Garron Site and all of its utilities should still stand on its own, but coordination with the County and state will be necessary to avoid any redundant construction. It has been 5 years since the original Feasibility Report, so the costs listed in it are somewhat outdated. Generally, the construction costs have been raised by 15% to reflect inflation. Watermain costs have been increased by 20% due to possible oversizing requirements by the Fire Marshall, and storm sewer costs by 48% to reflect the tighter standards for holding pond design. The new estimated total costs for Phase One construction are as follows: ITEM COST Sanitar� Sewer $237,000 Watermains $119,000 Storm Sewers $75,000 Streets $101,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST $562,000 County Participation $56,000 TOTAL CITY OBLIGATION $506,000 Assessments These costs are proposed to be split in the same manner used in the original report. There is one very significant difference between the revised funding proposal and the old proposal. In the original proposal the City intended to use T.I.F. funds to pick up the assessments for those parcels that would not have an immediate need for the utilities (MAC, Acacia non-dedicated land, and private parcels). The rational was that these parcel owners would ask for deferments anyway, so the City might as well pick up these costs with T.I.F. funds. Staff has reexamined this issue and has formulated a new opinion and recommendation on the matter. Staff proposes that all the property that can possibly be assessed should be assessed. If the property owners ask for deferments, the Council can consider each on a case by case basis. This � proposal would increase the assessed amount from 21� to 63� of the total project cost (ignoring county participation). The following is a summary of the new proposed assessment breakdown, including assessments for Acacia non-dedicated land, and private land: , PROPERTY T.I.F FUNDS ASSESSMENT TOTAL Garron Site Acacia Cemetery MAC Property (United Properties) Private Parcels SUBTOTAL County Participation GRAND TOTAL $110,500 $173,000 $174,400 (dedicated) (non-dedicated) $13,600 $186,600 $17,500 $17,400 $319,400 $110,500 $347,400 $17,500 $30,600 $506,000 $56,000 $562,000 This increased use of assessments and decreased use of T.I.F. money is the only major difference between this report and the original report. Questions to Resolve Council should address the following questions: 1) Is the proposed reduction in T.I.F. expenditures, and corres�onding increase in assessments an acceptable method of dividing the costs? 2) Is the newly updated feasibility report with all of the proposed changes RECOMMENDATION The installation of utilities to serve the property known as the Garron Site, is both technically and financially feasible, and therefore Staff recommends Council accept this report and order a public hearing. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with Staff's recommendation then Council should pass a motion addopting RESOLUTION 90- , RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER, AND STREET IMPROVMENTS TO SERVE THE GARRON PROPERTY. (IMPROVEMENT NO. 84, PROJECT NO. 2) City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 90- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT' AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER, AND STREET IMPROVE- MENTS TO SERVE THE GARRON PROPERTY (IMPROVEMENT NO. 84, PROJECT N0.2) WHEREAS, the City Engineer has submitted his report to the City Coun- cil with respect to the proposed construction of the following im- provements to serve the Garron property and ajacent areas, to-wit: The construction of an extension to the City's sanitary sewer system, including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acquisition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets and easements in the areas hereinafter more particu- larly described. � The construction of a storm sewer system including appurtenances and incidentals thereto and the acquisition of easements, in and for the area hereinafter more particularly described. The construction of an extension to the City's water distribution system including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acquisition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets and easements in the area hereinafter more particular- ly described. The construction of street improvements consisting of the acqui- sition of easements and the grading, stabilization, drainage and bituminous surfacing, and the construction of concrete curbs and gutters on the streets to be situated in the area hereinafter more particularly described. WHEREAS, the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is situated within the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minneso- ta, and is more particularly described as follows: The land abutting Pilot Knob Road (CSAH 31 and CR31A) extending from LeMay Avenue on the South to its terminus on the North. WHEREAS, in said report said City Engineer reported that the proposed improvements and construction thereof were feasible and desirable and further reported on the proposed costs of said improvements. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the report of said City Engineer be and is hereby received. t 2. That a public hearing on said improvements be held on Tues- day, March 20, 1990 at 7:45 o'clock P.M. at the Mendota � Heights City Hall 1101 Victoria Curve in the City of Mendota Heights. 3. That the City Clerk, with the aid and assistance of the City Attorney, be and is hereby authorized and directed to pre- pare a notice of said hearing and to cause said notice to be published and mailed to the owners of the property situated within said area, all in accordance with applicable Minneso- ta Statutes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 6th day of February, 1990. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk J � STAGE III ; s � � m / \ �I I / \ I� f o�� \ � \1 � � PROPOSED 12" WATERMdIN � a i 2 N S T A G E I ��; / \ / �� D \ � \ � \Cf m \� � r�� ,b� � � —� 7�/ S � � �J --- ��d y , \ � � q ,d,� � �l 9'y3 s�°aoya ,��' -1'� �\ 1 � � s �``°sva�� "9 p3 �~ � � r : � ,,d 0 m o tl3� �+" ��, p 9 r �m / `/ I � ` _ / ,�"r _' 'n �� I I TMOMAS AVE no 2C�/ �/ � i'�,�'�,'1,�y��VP� � a�' � If- - p� i�� i�;� a��;r�'�,';.,,,,�'� ` � > �� il �� e M'��'� 4 �'� �A... ^: �u,�• j ;�� ' ��r,,��,,� /�, 5 �� ,I �h; �4��'��I µ1��a��,� ydy �:��„N ,,i. � �, �� a � �,''� i� 1� "��I;Iir ', I� h il��.rl�l��" �Ml��n�i��' • � / „ �� ahN, �j7u�}d!i.,l, I��I�!�.,!Ir i�i �ir� dM i I �7a; ,��,V� � a c� �u�iW. ,�I�V�,I�I��; /� �� a;�'��U��.��'��.x�' 9�� • i��lli��l��l��lh�'� .,�y �, / a�'� / a��i"'' ��•' '��I'I�I�' p�p�i,N�1,G�,b .F� �,�r�j°4�y�u!��I' p � �9' "'��i�l�•i � i II ''�II� �'j�� i�n�Ijlll" ,�,� ,y �,��yC ti �Hi'u �� 9 / C� ,� 9,.�,�, �Y�'� ' �� i �i Y�yMr ��I l�llli l�� 'Wu o�k�i" r u1 �p�l �'�qCp / �,d ,� ,� a �ti�iw � ql, 1�" N� r� $� h"�5' � � x ��,�1 ��i ��'b I: I I I� J�� I I�„ �' ��, �� p Ifl � �N:� °� i � �I �"�. �k , � q I��rII / P� `��";:� ��k��1� �I: ��i �� II��C �� 6p�� e , i 91 J��'' I'�4�'' t i�W�;'h� �.�{�I!!P�� / r'f , G , �� ,��i„H . ;�!' ; V��.i wl'I:�� ! ��'h � . ��`o y ��, �1�,' j��n1��y�, q �i _� ' �.w� .^,ti11'C�e�':�'Mi:�"nJ�'i��i��l'+,�:� .�d!i '�r�'R!C�II�N�:;li'r�„� �i�i�ili'�'I�°° ni�Il�edH � vM!"!I�I��q'�� :Y:�i�T,tu.��.'?�'"C�.i;HlP.ld'w�� \ � �� - - :.. y::�'•:. - - . � �y•?i�•��•i•i � �, �::::;::;�:;;; ' � �"�::�: �`; �� i� � ''�� \`�o J� �O Y �F � 0 �. �. � \�9�`�'�,y I r�, � �,I ��p�h'��PM�i �w, \�y , ,�,�d�h�!,�%�� u��;�'��I�, ,, � 1 � I I��"i;�l i�I!y:+. I ,��';� �u��w!;; '��'��"tu� . ��1, \ N � 7��ia��9' „� ' �,��h h; , ,�, ��,�a�,N I , o r�'� ly�il„��''C��'��h�� ,�;��,. , M� � I I � . '— � I CITY OF MENDOTA H�IGH7'S MEMO October 23, 1984 T0: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Edward F. Kishel City Engineer SUBJECT: Feasibility Report Public Utilities Garron Property - Acacia Area Job No. 8420 Improvement No. 84, Project No. 2 INTRODUCTION• Mr. Steve E. Gage, of the Garron Corporation, requested that a feasibility report be prepared for the installation of public utilities to serve a piece of property on the north side of Acacia Cemetery adjacent to Pilot Knob Road, where a business headquarters is being proposed. DISCUSSION: _ In the process of determining how the property in question can be served with public utilities, a series of related conditions became apparent. They are indicated as follows: 1. The extension of City water causes a longer deadend line than now exists, resulting in the need to consider a loop closure from Pilot Knob Road to Lexington Avenue by way of S.T.H. Highway SS and 110. 2. Development of the Garron site will require a public sewage lift station and the possibility of a water booster pump by the Developer, if a high rise building is proposed. 3. The extension of Pilot Knob Road north of Acacia Boulevard, a county road, will require cooperation and financial participation from the Dakota County Highway Department. 1 4. A study in this southwest section of the City should give consideration to the determination of how public services can be f urnished to the Furlong Addition, and vicinity, on the easterly side of S.T.H. S5. 5. Any development in this area has to be tied in with Mn/DOT's construc— tion of highway development south of the Mendota Bridge. Consideration of the above items, as part of the development of the Garron site, is necessary because it will involve public utility completion in one of the few remaining undeveloped portions of the City. Providing public utilities to this part of the City falls within the Tax Increment District and it is necessary to look at the entire district to determine if and how the allocation of T.I.D. Funds will be needed and allocated. Because of the funding and the need for timing with state highway construc— tion, it is apparent that public utility construction in this vicinity will have to be done in stages. Serving the Garron site is number one. Other segments will depend on Mn/DOT and on required localized needs, as well as financing. For the purpose of this report, stage construction will be considered as follows: STAGE I: GARRON SITE — Along Pilot Knob Road -- This development will require the extension of existing water and sewer lines northward along Pilot Knob Road from LeMay Avenue. It will require the construction of Pilot Knob Road north of Acacia Boulevard, as well as the construction of storm sewers which will include a holding pond. These are as shown on the attached drawing. Stage I construction is essential to early development of the Garron site and can be completed prior to Mn/DOT construction in the vicinity. STAGE I_ ESTIMATED COST -- Including Overhead, Fees and Contingencies Sanitary Sewers Watermains \ Storm Sewer:�'w�►�o��rn� PondJ Streets Estimat:ed Total Deduct County Road Participation Estimated Assessable Amount 2 +is � �232, 094.OQ�' 267,00a tza �. 98, 938.08---� �19,�oa *4s% 50,462.00—� `15,aoo +�5 %$8 , 860. 00—� 10 l,00 0 $470, 354. 0(�'� 562�000 48,873.Ot�--� 56,�aa �421, 481. 00---�- 5o6.,aoa G The above estimated costs include a sewage lift station and force main, a storm sewer holding pond and street construction. Because of the limited amount of assessable frontage for the size of the project, some sort of special financing arrangements will be required. At this time it is staff's suggestion that assessment rates, based on estimate� construc- tion costs, he established for parcels with normal front footage and that larger buildable sites be assessed for sanitary sewer construction according to their developable capabilities and need for special construction. For the purpose of anticipating potential assessments for specific parcels as part of the First Stage construction, it is Staff's suggestion that, for sanitary sewer construc- tion, benefited properties be assessed on a front foot basis as well as a square foot basis for large parcels which have developable property located more than 150 feet from the street property line. This is being done because sewers will be avazlable to this property when it becomes developable. Sanitary sewer assessments are also being separated into "Low" and "High" benefited areas to the existing gravity sewer system versus areas connected to the l�ft station collection system. Conforming with previous assessment methods, it is estimated that there will be approximately 4,443 feet of front footage for sewer and water extensions and approximately 747,400 square feet of additional area for the determination of sanitary sewer assessments. Storm sewer assessments will be determined on the area contributing to the need for storm sewers. Street construction wi.11 be based on the front footage abutting the newly constructed street. It is anticipated that Acacia Cemetery Association will request the deferr- ment of any assessments made against cemetery properties, dedicated for burial purposes or not. It is also anticipated that deferrments will be requested by �1.A.C. and other private parties based on l�ck of benefit at this time. It is � here where T.I.D. funds may have to be used. �F S+��k hov,l re�ommend5 -th�i- T 1.�� onl y� be used F�,- o�'�-se�;n� �1�r1��z� ce,�e��'y (and fa.- a�=5e+i;n� i�-�'e{e5-1" �yw+c�-s on d�-rrrted assessmen+-s,. � 0 For the purpose oE evaluating possible assessment rates and potentia7. finan- cing, staff is establishing uniL ratas, based on estimated costs far Chis pro- ject, as fallows. 6� 04 Sanitary Sewers - High Benefited Land ��'�.'I.7 ger assessab].e �44� 36.4� Sanitary Sewers - Low Benefa.ted Land $�73 per assessabl� foot p, 0345 Trunk Sanitary Sewers - $�3 per assessable square £t. (for property deeper than 150 ft. back of property line) Watermains - Trunk Water - Storm Sewers - Streets - 2$.94- �2 per assessable foot o,� a6 $�Tj`65 per assessable square f�. 0.125'7 $`i�ii$5 per square faot �7 69 �:�8 per assessable foot (County Share - .�� per faot) Therefore, based on the above cra.tera.a, a normal 15,OOQ square foot residen- /Q� Ooc� tial assessment is estimated to be about $$�t?�70 per parcel. Using the above criteria far larger parcels or greater ownership, staff has determined that as af today, the Acacia Cemetery Assaciatian is likely to be 3-¢%, 900 / /3, ao 0 assessed a tatal af �$;�9T:� far a11 improvements. Approximately $�rf��9_ 17¢ .�4aa will be against dedicated cemetery and �T4"o;7`�1�:D'0 will be against non-dedicated ceme�ery property. A representative of the Association has already indicated that they would be requesting a deferrmen� of the assessmen�s until utiliCies are needed or a major portion of cemetery property is develaped. Following the same criteria, staff has determined that the Garron properties l/oa5oo will be assessed an estimated �";3JZ�, Other potentia3. assessable pragerties cou3.d brzng in approxi.mately .�g, I t� o �-,�"�'0, resultin� in the follawin� summarv; Estimated Total Project Cost - Estirnated Income: Acacia Ceme�ery 4 r�-F assEss 173000 ��7.y.� �.o� ��.�'T : DO �`62,aoo $ 7 ),'�'r+.(�D 0 �� Garron Properties Other Properties County Street Participation Estimated Tota1 j ��. Oa 186> b ot� -�-�.. ��-� : ao �` EstimaCed Ba].ance L-o be fa.nanced by T.I.D. 37 , �-oo ��2,�7� o .xm JCi � L' : �� S . �'# Exceeds minimum 20� of tptal i.mpravement cost, therefore able to be done under Statute 429. . a This pro�osed project represent�-�:,�-�-rst majar app3ication af the Tax Increment District (T.I.D.} to assist in the fznancing of an unusually costly and limited assessable praject. The City was faced to some extent with this in the development of Phase I of the M.A.C. project, however, this report addresses ane of the principal reasons for the establishment of the T.I.D. As the Tax Increment District was put together, it was felt that where unusual. projects were considered, that unusual methods oi payment shoul.d be cansidered. It is intended that the Tax Incremen� be used ta subsidize impravement to make projects of this type possible. The actual improvement will be carried ou� as a 429 Improvement within the T.I.D, with annual allotment of increment necessary to make up fu11 payment on the barrowed funds. The district is and wil]., in the future, be financially able to take care of finances required, particularly if an�icipated develapment takes place, Subsequent, Fhases 2, 3, and 4, will be cansidered in a similar manner as future improvements are made. L� n STAGE II: WAT�R LOOP CONNI,CTION -- Pilot Knob Road to Lexington Avenue This proposed segment of construction requires the installation of a 12 inch water loop from Pilot Knob Road to Lexington Avenue. It is part of the master water plan for the City that has been put off for several reasons. Justification for the need for such extension has been valid f.or some time but the ability to physically install a pipe line has been held up until Mn/DOT has established and implemented a plan for highway construction in that vicinity. Cooperation with Mn/DOT will be necessary to locate the pipeline in a frontage road proposed for the south side of Highway SS and 110 as shown on the attached drawing. For informational purposes, approximately S00 feet of the proposed 12 inch water extension on the south side of S.T.H. 110 will be going through the City of Mendota, a segment of which extends into Resurrection Cemetery, as shown on the drawing. Actual installation will have to wait for Mn/DOT construction, estimated to r99� be started ir►�1-�}$8. Based on 1984 construction costs, the work is estimated to cost $385,925. This includea some $25,000 for a limited amount of sanitary sewers along Acacia Boulevard east of Pilot Knob Road. Here again, the assessable cost will greatly exceed the amount that can be received from assessments. This difference will have to be made up by the use of T.I.D., or other funds�5"`f► as wa�Z�,re�env<.s� STAGE III: PILOT KNOB ROAI3- c��-E�ED �ls Pqrrr oF 7HE BiG WNE�L pRaTEcT, This segment will include the extension of watermains to complete a loop on Pilot Knob Road. It will also require a cased highway crossing, but not until the rough grading of Highway 13 at Pilot Knob Road has been completed. The estimated cost of installing a 12 inch watermain on Pilot Knob Road fro►n south of proposed Fiighway 13 to LeMay Avenue is $191,688. This includes an incased highway crossing, street restoration and oversize pipe, the total of 6 0 � which is estimated Lo be almost 6Q� of the above es�imated cast. Here again, the availab].e assessable �rontage is limited and the construc— ta.on will be high. It wili be necessary to use outside or o�her, funds �`T,I.D} to absorb the casts tf�at cannot be directly assessed. STAGE IV: FQRLONG ADDITIQN AND ALQNG HIGHWAY 55 ACACTA BLVD. TO M�NDOTA I�IGHTS ROAD TfItS PHt�SF IS B�tN4 EnAmiu�D !nr r� s�P��,;�� r��Pa�cr T For the past several. years, residents of the Furlong Addition and vica.nity have expressed cancern regarding the adequacy af their grivate sanitary sewer and water systems. In 1975, the Council d�.rected a sewer and water s�udy for the � Furlong area whzch 9.ndicated that although it was physically possible to install public utilzties to serve the area, the casts were Loo great to handle on a da.rec� assessment basis and the matter was dropped. Now with T.I.D. funds'avail— able, this matter shauld be reconsidered and revived when Mn/DOT becomes involved with hi.ghway reconstructian. To do the work as shown an the attached drawing, will cast an estimated M1� �/ $53-$�-3-C-$ far sanitary sewers and $22�4590 for water extensions. This includes overhead, fees and contengeneies. Here again, it is estimated that only lj3 af �he total cost might be recavered from assessments. Therefore an estimated N/A $5��4 will have ta came from other sources, namely, Tax Increment District. ALTERNATIVES Although this report has given consideration ta several pragosed utility projects, it appears tha�. all but one depend upan highway construcCion by MnfDQi", and aZ1 of which appear to be several years away. Therefore, the only alterna— ta.ve far tha.s project is to install utilities and construct a street to serve the Garron site along Pilot Knob Road. It so happens that the proposed Garron site development instigated this report and is in need of the facil.ities as soon as possibl.e. 7 � R�COMMENDATION Tt is therefore recommended that the Council receive and apgrove this report and take the neeessary steps to arder the a.nstallation o� public utilities �o s�rve the Garron site first, while waiting .far Mn/Df}'I' to move on highway can— sCruction a.mplementa�ian. Tha.s wi].1 permit the City to establish utility exten— sions as individual conditions develop. ACTION RE�C IJIRED � If Council agrees with s�aff recammendation a public hearing date should t�e set as soon as possible and a motion should be made adopting Resolution No. 84— , Resolution Accepting Engineer`s Report and Calling Far Hearing on Proposed Sanitary Sewer, Water, Storm Sewer, and Street Improvements to Serve the Garron Proper�y (Improvement No. 84, Project No. 2) E:3 GITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO January 23, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administrator FROM; Klaytan Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Report on additional MSA street designatian, Job No. 9Q01 DISCUSSION OF ADDITIONS TO MSA STREET SYSTEM The maximum length af Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets in the City is directly related to the total length of all local streets in �.he City. Since there has been a great increase in the tatal local �treet mileage aver th� past few �ears due �Go new construct�,an, we can add an adclitianal 2.16 mlles of street to our MSA system. In order to collect constructian and main�.enance maney far these extra miles, the mileage must be designated: The City must declare what streets will be added to the system. We can designate a street naw and change the designatian later iar good reasons. The attached document is a description of all the streets in the City that meet MSA minimum requirements and have s�ome �ustification in being part of �he MSA system. The listing �.s generally in order Qf my recammenclation. An attached map shows the current system highlighted as well a� the possible additions ta the system. The �.op candida�e far MSA designatian is Pilot Knab-Acacia from future T.H. 13 to T.H, 55. This �egment must eventually be canstructed to M5A standards, and will have assessment complications due ta the cemetery i'rontage. The next street on �he list is Victoria Rd. fram Lexington to Marie. It is currently a County raad, but will be turned back eventualiy. Since it is also a frontage road, nearly half of its length has only one assessible side. Therefore this is an excellent choice for MSA de�ignation. Decorah Lane is the third street on the list. This street make� sense for an upgrade from an engineering standpaint. The traffic volumes are high, the street is in poar condition, and conventianal street restoratian wau.ld resu.lt in high assessment rates which are not politically viable. MSA money cau3d be used much as it was used for the Chippewa project. The only problem is that MSA streets have a minimum width of 40-44 ieet depending an the traffic valum�s. By designating these three segments, 1.96 mile� would be added to the system. If only the �`irst two were added to the �ystem the desiqnation would only be 1.42 miles. There are many possible options, but Staff feels the�e three are the most needed, and their designati.on would accomplish the most. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO Note that the City must have its designation in to the state by March 1 if we wish to receive aid next year. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council designate additional streets as part of the MSA system. Staff recommends the Pilot Knob-Acacia segment and Victoria Road segment be designated, and also recommends Council consider designating Decorah. ACTION RE4UIRED If Council desires to implement the Staff recommendation they should pass Resolution No. 88- , RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS. �< � � e , City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 90_ � RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the streets hereinafter described should be designated as Municipal State Aid Streets under the provisions of Minnesota Laws of 1967 Chapter 162: NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the streets described as follows, to- wit: 1. Pilot Knob Road and Acacia Drive, from future State Trunk Highway 13 to State Trunk Highway 55, 2. Victoria Road, from Lexington Avenue to State Trunk Highway 13, 3. Decorah Avenue, from State Trunk Highway 149 to Huber � Drive, , be, and hereby is established, located, and designated Municipal State Aid Streets of said City of Mendota Heights, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Highways of the State of Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissioner of Highways for his consideration, and tha•t upon his approval of the designations of said street, or portion thereof, that same be constructed, improved and maintained as municipal state aid streets of the City of Mendota Heights. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 6th day of February 1990. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk �� MSA STREET � � . � POSSIBL.E MSA ADDiTION � �.� �r�� '. � t �� 1y,5`� � aj��r�'1 7.: .' �---.�'`,a��4U � f�vri��-�� h ! _....,. �,t �O y �•I w.rlcto • - .._. ... _ _ .. :� {_��s.u. %)/ t _^,_.S: -...� :. ,� ,C��» �� / • 44 Y p � � .�.i�"i�_"� R � � � �=Y"'�.:,,.'"'1 /�// // I � ag J ��,SEi ......� ^' � / � ' M�P = �_�_ �IC` ICO.�^ r-% r / �v1N�� " !'tttN�i 4C � //.,/��,, NTI � T �'•/•� �,,,��'�\!i � ,_/ l7'� { y J� $TRdSf0t10..(Ap. � \ � " � T""' /� \ j u• , 5 �y� �! , `� � (�`� � ' \V�CUI. lIG1Y l� -- t � '" S i 4 N 1l ��-- - �. � �c � � i �— K�+Kt t6 = / •L l; � w � ,�t ; .� jj �� ,.� i u r � ci. � � N Ji� ,' � 4 NOO1G �� --`L�-(,_F� 10Au i ti�� , �__�� ._._ __ --••,.,�_"'�= f��-} i iwix F r r�rvc�L€-�5"^� + � 0 l J � �` enm c M' � ^ Ls_� � � :: i� Y; Y , �ya � �= �.�<�Y+t�p �"�'�'�"s� � Y M 5� c '� �eH .'� — • _ = : � � 2 35t •, i " CV l t It ' - - Al'£ � �� ♦ - __ olN�nJG •t• iSMT — _��4 ' � �[OHG~' � WAGON WIICEI 1L�CN� `_ 11 ��' ~•� �,"_"_cVrc• _ ��.�rr � """ t e�� .�. ReK+s ........��_. t� [Nf� _- €� � t� ��.�o ,� . • _ IMI[�M�s �� _ � �A.•� .�� . M�D�I�I�ION ~� -.� �� ---a�= � . r �3> f �.` �`�� .� ��tlyCpn�\ � �! �r+� \� � � � , ,� _✓� .,�_;;�-r.'=- __"�� _<<_......� J��_.._.....- ,� �_� .-_ ��L�`�/' wf 1 �=��+C��RAMSEY' C0. �4a�..a.,tt!1'f.J�3�_ '— ��=�AKO A CO. . ie�-" � �;23 !�� Ke i .=. j ,�'Etf�„_4{ . �=`—�__ / /,P7%'� i �� `t:�� ! ��f'�'`=�'Is. . P�'� /r t [j �� VC��-� �� ` `y�P J \ W q�� iy.11S Q pA /8 / ( 4 . i vF . �"1��' N� I�LI S MC l\Ir ' <�- N G Ct aMSE �ta7� �„a �� c.��. �s � 314 z C, � � f//"^�� . �L�._,51�/ 1 •\ B� f, 4�i��%. � �r� At� hv[, � � _.�� ..� �� e. ' � �>£ � t1 - ��jj p` j — 1 / �r Y F` N ��L V � 4 �'f j� OCCA SRiry, I'��y�% 1 C�T. �1 �b' vl��' z�� a !NA � ( e ct, � � � .,� � d r� � I te • ��AD. pae � , � - �� .�«E ««,� : f i .:,,�.� � .� � � l��Ilw.�E�� _ _ � tR:: � � * �� 4 "� •�1 �,.��° l�p�(� �..� � � N� IAjjw'4Y�� —� � `� „��.�_..__�-- - -� u"` �,6 � z�.Np . s rtSC: J4� f� • CIP `. 110 r2xoou '. p �r4 , pp i ^ 119 1�' a� j , S�r " " 1 �p�.1�✓ 1 � N qk 1 s- S J L\ �w..."� L � � f � � � MKn�� C1R } d W �pt.4i Rt1:C � • 1, J i � � \ .i — � [IR V S Qj�4 x �� F k�.� �. �-- `y��L � �` nnf ' '�' �'� J �. a tlJs _ .1�:a+i rta � . , ni �. �'�`� � '� ._ � � � • • �,� � : eio�eii� �. � (��` ��y� �� _�' � � z a :��r ��.._ i{? ' ss o� _ rs '� C� 1/ C�,v S�4U. _� ? �� i WI�,C/ ....�-' O �� sr 4� r �wc � s �� t� ' ��V�i`^ � li y Y a yt � Y � r4y �Y � i o q r�ti � :+Mr� ! o ��, : - � `" � � p _ ' � a r . . ° .��. _IS..o. _ _ _ � ....'i. V s'� _ ..,-.9�_....—,__.__ —""` _ ' � . � - _ 119 �� ' . �� : tHV EAGAN :\ S J � POSSIBLE MSA STREET ADDITIONS STREET: Pilot Knob Road LOCATION: (1) Future 13 to Highway 55 LENGTH: .51 miles DESCRIPTION: Widen & redesign to match with interchange project. DISCUSSION: The City has already agreed to accept Pilot Knob Road and Acacia back from the County when the interchange project is constructed. Mendota Heights has also agreed to construct Pilot Knob Road to MSA standards. The presence of the cemetery will make it difficult to justify the assessment costs of street construction. MSA designation would provide significant funding assistance. STREET: Victoria Avenue LOCATION: (2) Lexington Avenue to Marie Avenue LENGTH: .90 miles DESCRIPTION: Widen and Upgrade DISCUSSION: Victoria Road is on the County turnback program and it is already MSA from Marie Avenue to Trunk Highway 13 so this would be a logical extension. It is a frontage road with only one side of the street assessable so MSA funds would be extremely valuable to avoid unrealistic assessment rates in the future. It has fairly high traffic volumes, so a widening project would make sense. STREET: Decorah Lane LOCATION: (3) Dodd Road to Huber Drive LENGTH: . 55 miles DESCRIPTION: Widen to /�0 �, add Storm Sewer DISCUSSION: Decorah Lane is already acting as a major collector and it links up with primary thoroughfares at both ends. Decorah Lane is in a state of serious decay and as an MSA street the adjoining homes would see the costs of repair reduced, especially if curb and gutter were required as part of upgrading. STREET: Emerson Avenue LOCATION: (L�) Dodd Road to Delaware Avenue LENGTH: .37 miles DESCRIPTION: Widen and Upgrade DISCUSSION: Emerson Avenue acts as a minor collector and connects to major streets. Traffic volumes, however, are not so high that extra lanes are re- quired. STREET: Lexington Avenue LOCATION: (5) Marie Avenue to T.H. LENGTH: .36 miles DESCRIPTION: Widen, add Storm Sewer, fix vertical alignment. DISCUSSION: The entire length of Lexington Avenue is under MSA, except this portion. MSA money could be used to improve the Lexington Avenue/Trunk Highway 13 intersection. However, it is questionable whether we coula. meet MSA stand- ards on this segment. STREET: Wachtler & Wentworth Avenues LOCATION: (6) Delaware to T.H. 13 LENGTH: 1.74 miles DESCRIPTION: Widen & Upgrade DISCUSSION: This segment acts as major collector. It is a County Road, so it _ would be a joint City/County upgrade. Since it is controlled by the County and the traffic levels are not excessive; an upgrade is not mandatory. This propos- al could be done just in segments since it is a very long stretch. The segment from Dodd to Delaware would be a logical first choice (.54 miles). STREET: South Plaza Drive LOCATION: (7) Dodd Road to T.H. 110 LENGTH: .45 miles DESCRIPTION: Widen & Extend, possible over- pass. DISCUSSION: If additional expansion ever ta.kes place at the shopping center, and if more street service is needed due to the lack of an intersection upgrade at 1/�9/110, South Plaza Drive could be extended to Trunk Highway 110. An overpass might be required resulting in the very high cost of approximately $1.5M. � t : t :.--.� � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council, FROM: Kla�ton H. Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Status of City February 1, 1990 City Administrator Acquired Properties DISCUSSION The City currently has nine acquired properties which Staff has been working to coordinate building removal, site clean- up, well closure, and other problems. There have been numerous difficulties which have occurred throughout the process. The purpose of this memo is to bring Council up to date on some of these difficulties and get Council input on some of the decisions which need to be made. 2141 Highway 55 �This building has been moved off the site, the hole has been . fenced, and the agreement with the mover, Bill Otting, expires February 12. The mover has asked for an extension on � the deadline for filling the hole and cleaning up the site because of the frozen ground. Council could take two approaches here: Either the deadline could hold and the mover forfeit the $1,000 escrow, or a 60 extension could be granted. If no extension were given, the City would have to complete the clean-up, and it is questionable whether we could complete all the work while the ground is frozen. 2143 Highway 55 This site was originally not sold as part of the closed bidding process. However it was later sold to Tom Doroff for $200. Mr. Doroff was unable to gain the necessary financing so the agreement fell through. The fire department was informed that the building was no longer to be sold, and the department decided to use it for training. Just this week Mr. John Winzig contacted Staff and offered $500 for the house subject to the same terms and conditions as all other house moving agreements. Mr. Winzig is very hopeful that the city will enter an agreement (he plans to attend the Council Meeting to voice his feelings). Staff has no opinion on this matter. If things go well this agreement could save the city some money; on the other hand, there can be a lot of "hand holding" involved which becomes distracting and costly. 2145, 2161 Hi hwav 55 These two sites have been very costly in terms of time and money. The salvage agreement with Mr. Nelson was prepared, but he never agreed to sign it. Therefore Staff never gave him keys or permission to salvage. Some unknown person or persons have been doing some unauthorized salvaging at both sites. Staff has taken measures to keep the sites secure, but the "door has been opened". Another problem with both these sites revolves around the capping of their wells. Dakota Count� is in the process of putting new well capping regulations into affect, and Mendota Heights and our contractor, Associated Well Drillers, are getting caught in the middle. For the past month we have been attempting to fulfill the county requirements but can't seem to do so. Staff has indications Associated will be asking for extra payment due to these difficulties. 1805 Delaware Mark Goldberg, the recipient of this house, has made a request for a time extension for completion. (see attached letter) Mr. Goldberg has been very cooperative and has made every effort to complete the agreement. He has obtained all the permits, has a site ready for the house, and intends to move the house shortly. Staff recommends that he be granted an extension. 1199 Roaers Road The agreement on this house still has several weeks until the work must be completed. 1305, 1306 Kendon These were both recently acquired. No arrangements have been made to sell or remove these houses yet. Staff intends to get a contract to cap the wells as soon as possible. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council extend the agreement with Mark Goldberg and Bill Otting to April, 1990 for site restoration only, and recommends Mark Goldberg be given an extension to March 1 for the moving of the house. Staff has no recommendation on Mr. Winzig's request to purchase 2143 for $500. ACTION REQUIRED Council should direct Staff on the above matters. �......-� � �� .' January 30, 1��0 T�,?endota i�eight s C ii;y C ouncil 1101 Victoria Curve Pa�en�.ota Hei�hts, I:i�� 55118 Subject: Bid Proposa.l of r ive Hund.red doll�.rs for house located at 2J� Htivy 55 Mendota Hei�hts. Buyer: J ohn �,Vinzig, Eagan, i1�T . Propo.sal includes �1000 security deposit to insure the City Of Mendota r�eights for the follov�in�: House to be moved v�rithin g0 days of bid approv�.l. Foundation to be backfilled within the same g0 days. Buyer to comply vt�th all City and State regulations � regarding ihis move. House will be moved zo 710 :Lone. �Oak. Road. �a�;an; ..T�N. . Sincerely, _ �� r J l.�i�ia�C^w��/� J ohn !`! inz ig 1 _, .; .—� -�� ,. + : _; �� _ , � � �� . _.,._: , �;� ,�,��.�,�� I i � ��`V�SL"�t�`�'.�1 . �I! � i;: �;i jli 'i� � �� , vv \ i,� : � i i � \�„� � � � ��`�, !' � � i � a� �� .. � �'�`'�. �, � � : C�` ^ . i i ; � .� � \.�-�, \\'��.�''"'�- �. �1��^�. �li �� ,j� �• � �' �� s� `� � i j �`� • � ��.��J�,. ��. �'� ; , � ��-�� lii �_ ' Z��. � `=�� _ / ��,--� , ,,,� \ � 1 � � � �� . ` �. ��-3�� 9 c� - a �t ��j . v� � 1 j � ��•� ..�! M � t ' � 7 d C3tting 1-�ouse Movers 1� 64Q East 275th Street Lakeville, MN 55044 {612} 46�-3265 January 30, 1990 Mr. Klayton H. Eck7.es, P.E. Civil Engineer Ci�y of Mendota Heights I101 I��.ctor�ia Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mx. Eckies: In respanse to youx letter of January 23, 1990, we have fenced araund the house at 2141 Highway 55 with a fi.ve foot, vexy stxong mesh fence. We have been unable �o make arrangernents wi�h a contractor to £ill in �he basemenC as the graund is frozen too deep far them to do any digging. MWe would like �o request an extension un�il it is possible for us to dig around the area and fill in the basement. Sincerely, � �.�. � ''�� W��.liam B, Otting Owner , WB4:jo ti ' • CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO February 2, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrato i FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer ;j, SUBJECT: Lexington Heights Apartment Revenue Bonds HISTORY In December of 1983, the City issued Mortgage Revenue Bonds to finance the Lexington Heights Apartment project. The developer of the project has requested that the City authorize the refinancing of the project to permit re-borrowing on more favorable terms. IRS regulations require a public hearing on the refinancing. � Under the terms of our Resolution No. 85-40 we will receive an expense escrow of $2,500 prior to publication of the hearing notice. ACTION Adopt Resolution No. 90 - calling a hearing for March 6, 1990 on the refinancing proposal. LES:kkb Attachments 1 THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNE..SOTA RESOLUTION NO. ESTABLISHING A DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (the "Act"), the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota proposes to issue up to $11,000,000 of housing mortgage revenue refunding bonds (the "Bonds"); and WHEREAS, under Section 147(f) of the Internal ftevenue Code of 1986, as amended, a public hearing regarding the issuance of the Bonds is required to be held following publication of notice thereof in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Mendota Heights. NOW, THEREFOftE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota: 1. A public hearing will be held by the City Council on March 6, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. regarding the issuance of the Bonds 2. The City Administrator or his designee is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of such public hearing in substantially the form attached hereto to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Mendota. Heights. . Adopted this Sth day of February, 1990. ATTEST: M PIIBLIC HEARING IdOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ISSUANCE OF HOUSING MORTGAGE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS BY THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing shall be conducted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights (the "City"), Minnesota on the proposed issuance by the City of lilendota Heights of refunding bonds Qursnant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 462C, for the purpose of refinancing a 225 unit multifamily rental housing development located at 2300 South Lexington, Mendota. Height (the "Project") owned and operated by Lexington Heights Associates Limited Partnership (the "Company"). The hearing will be held at the City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota on Tuesday, March 6, 1990, at 7:30 o'clock P.M. It is proposed that $11,000,000 in� principal amount of tax-exempt housing mortgage revenue refunding bonds (the "Bonds") of the City will be issued to prepay and redeem the outstanding prineipal balance of the City's $11,000,000 Housing Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Lexington Heights Apartments Project), dated as of December 1, 1983, originally issued to finance the construction of the Project. At said time and place the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights shall give all parties who appear an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal to undertake and � finance the Project. The Bonds shall be limited obligations of the City and the Bonds and interest thereon shall be payable solely from the revenues pledged to the payment thereof, except that such Bonds may be secured by a mortgage or other encumbrance on the Project. No holder of any such Bond shall ever have the right to eompel the exercise of any taxing power of the City to pay the Bonds, or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment against any property of the City except the Project. City Clerk 'a ••`f CITY OF MENDOTA AEIGHTS MEMO January 29, 1990 To: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistan L� Subject: Recognition of Parks Commissioners DISCUSSION , The Parks and Recreation Commission has requested that City Council formally recognize the contributions of their recently retired commission members, specifically Bev Lachenmayer and Bill Owens. Both Bev and Bill served the Parks Commission with distinction and were' instrumental in helping pass the Parks bond referendum. Bev Lachenmayer's and Bill Owen's voluntary dedication in serving the City through the Parks and Recreation Commission is demonstrative of their committment to the community and the fine job they performed speaks highly of both commissioners. � Staff has prepared the attached certificates for the two ex- commissioners. ACTION REOUIRED Authorize the Mayor to endorse the Council's recognition of the outstanding service provided to the City by ex-Parks and Recreation Commissioners Bev Lachenmayer and Bill Owens. ✓' �v ._ �V �� i�� % %� i �� % i � � � _; _= �� = � ` ��% �� G i ^ � � � / �%/. ... .�b .i�:i�......� �-..�`.�-_�.� rii /� �� / � / � � . _ � ��v\� � \ 1`.., Y/�/.��:%� = :c��:\�\:v � � iM^' 1'W�•:Sir�li^ "�.MiiY"+�iw�Y . . �.Y-�}%)t)x'. VY.i+:'.i� � �. � �4�1 /.��. r:, . n. . •�. . ;n. . , n. . ~^.. � ; , .. � �\\�� % � �� _� < �X;Y '4,x , � ..: •. �: _ = . i^ ..• . < y ;: i /�" / 1 ,'' � � •',:'.� , y' ��: %.� -'� �-. ".0 � �. ,�.. v % .. .�..^�.,��_�' � , .s' . . i ;�� i• i.,•, .�.� =`�`�� V1,C/ •\ .'�ti+.�; ,Y: ��. -,.� i .1 :y,� - .. �yr+"v„y.K.v�" V4.;. .. .�. . :i � ;� ,.�� ° :;�. " �� .:�. �• .: •�� y�_ c;,�;:� =>:. m.. � �� : :;�. ��>� , � .. .__, . .� . :.rc+ �% iG;i%%% '�' �r. ., . , . . G �y.'��{'v��°�1i,� �,: � ��iy"rMti _�1+�.�, � �""`"� " = �,,....-",'� ,�'� ",,,�```�.��r. �- _,� r=-:s3� �=�—=��. y. �i � r r,�„ �---� iiaG.:Gcc.+e►�� \��-�_------ _-!� �:� ��,... �.. � � �� Li - EE IL x12 fin ijfl _ r 1_1" wz.-, j 11,7 f::LL • NOTH LEVTCN • .---ntxrun.c. ill I I • CE tCK. 4,/ E-IL1 ...4r VP 06101 r.tri eoVV LA N G EK SA EA51 OPEI.AND •VEMUL (1—iA 771IL DESIGNERS • _ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY WEST SAINT PAUL. MINNESCrIA er12-457-5991 • BUILDERS • DEVELOPERS PROJE:. i', A'a _7- M•tt4CT/... CELb4T5 - -----Z-. LI , -' (2, --r- /0 N AN ii,',.....' __. --:....,---77-:7-. . "EWA. MR.., 1“, • .45 9FKIR, yr,. iauFPalar, it• 51.1•E.,,,, •..- • •••• Pt., WCIIIC4.1.0. Oc . TN- I.*, 4 WV OW, . •. a ,g. r Of ,,,s/ro, LOCIf. • •• t •••• 5 Or , .4. CHEr .. .-- - - ... Slikll , •••••4 S., • Jr ,, .- ....7 06101 • • \ \ „t • z” • z7r • \ \ \ ..; S. , • Tat ,i- tni 7 _....c=___ -..• I , ---7— I : i 1.1 2.4 14,, — 1 I ; _________ _ K •.. 0661 LANGER S4 LAS, lattnlAkti CONSTRUCTION COMPANY WEST S. Pon P•ut hom•F-SOln V2-45,-56123 DESIGNERS - BUILDERS DEVELOPERS POJEZ' . ; ;`• I A • ' ;.*•••• cFor••••; ••••••• •• 94 CS WKS' T5 IMII•04E:' S.. 5,01.1vrSit.7. ••••• • ••• N...; • G.S• I .1, ••3 • -4 •• 'I AL••••5.7.• SHEE— Or 1' 44. tf. ji-4 11-4t. 11-4 It- 4t 4 Zen Li • , I -- I I ! I I I ; so g : ' I I 2.b.-tir I 2_ _. t.; ' I i ---- 1 eintAHrt, trr-7 nJtr: 57, 4,164•Ittr, :..ro.on Atriorl. • 4.444.4... Sok.PIT efrot.tem. -.1141.44...4 MA, 44.4 41. 044.. -4 4trf =: /•-• . .,__?•-•t• ..,...' 4 IOW,. 1 4 4 I 44 4-* t mtetlx, LANGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Lr- S. LAST G.DeEteelft 'VENUE WT SAA., PAL, MINNE.S01.• rf-GS7-See3 DESIGNERS • BUILDERS • DEVELOPERS PROJEZ' t-Gt 'lLPI U. r_ScG toy OF WK., tea., ..letteet lt• Or •Gr 44,4 ,/ar 54-0,4444,44,•411.44, NA 1 ••• • Ov. • .4f 71 S -r 444, WM. r 4. 44.44$ LA -I REvSONS _ N N , - - \ _ Eta 41-RuCa ?cm' I T E F LAN — I.- A N - J- .: API N 4e, LANGER s„ .., - 5. F.5, MORELAND ALIN,11" WES, SANT PAUL WWNESOYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 81?-45,-StR3 DESIGNERS • BUILDERS • DEVELOPERS PROJECT All N DL.TA, 1-1CTS 41\1 I MAI L- MFNCtrii, H514141'5 / nAP . 'NEWRY DARYA', ,NLA PLAN SWCR,D,RON O. 12PORT WAR ARADAREORYW 0. AY. WY DO2E.7 SLP .v Dft•DULA OURSYL-RES "7114 LAWS Or S'A uWESOii RE 'SONS 1 \ INNN. 1'N/ / • e' /// N 0 ca E\ff I.I544 G7NpE FXP OHG Gnex lE P C.—' =-3 - - su,crACEW .- .f F.rn' E oFLAN I II fid, LANGER 5� flet uONEE•NO •vf�RR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY WEi !13-67,-533,1 DESIGNERS • BUILDERS DEVELOPERS PROJE:- .weerv,-..,W, ,.ac ., v. s+Ecsc.,cp. x ar•c., .. r.n+.+eo••v a. woe• t. JP,' S.If•v Sra. ••n •... ..v. Oulu •eGK'F•C: • ✓Ce•'Pt i•.S 0, 7.4 3 'I C •..•[Sc-. Sou' 0 JD!N4 e ---m— \ FL v-2.12 F -rc-red- 9 o 43 71--107E. : " itJCLUDsa. 421 oF k.Reb,5. ..iNd I ANGER 'Th7--c'iGN:--RS • CONSTRUCTION COMPANY :JL2RSD \ C, . CAT_ NIX:7A -CT -S .AN I AA AL H.C.-)SFITA, A., • • -e 06" '4> /0 65 4 - Iv 5q 11asaa aiaa®`�iJ2.t�i�y� NORTH»» > 8' Bit. Path on South side of st. (not shown) . Bridge • O oc° ti WAGON WHEEL FEASIBILITY REPORT 8816, 88-7 Feb. 11, 1990 Examination of Alignment