The URL can be used to link to this page

1990-07-17� 2. Call to order. 2. Roll CaZ1. 3. 4. CITY OF MENDOTA xEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA JULY 17, 199d - 7:30 F.M. Agenda Adoption - Consent Calendar Z a. Acknowledgment of the June Treasurer's Report. b. Approval of Final Plat RESOLU2'ION NO. 90-43 and Developer's Agreement for Mendota Woods. c. RESQLUTION NO. 90-44 - Resolutian Calling for Hearing on Assessment Rolls for Big Wheel Auto Site, Ivy Fal1.s Creek Addition, North Svy Hills 2nd Addition and A1ice Lane Subd`ivisian. d. Approval of the List af Contractars. e. Approva3 of the Li.st of Claims. f. Approval to Refund House Moving E�craw. g, Rece�ve Petition Opposing Utility �xtension - Furlong Addition. End of Cansent 5. Publia Camments * a. Mawing of Natural Green Areas. 6. 2ntroductians a. Appointment of New Fire Personnel 7. Hearinq a. CASE NO. 90-19: ** 8:00 P.M. ** Delta Environmental Gonsultants - CUP - Amoco Station Accessory S�.ruc�ure RESOLUTION NO. 90-45 8. Unfinished and New Business a.. CASE N{1. 90-20: Sjahalm. CUP - RESflLUTION NO. 90-46 � Q�� *** b. CASE NO. 90-21: Batesville Casket Campany - Variance and Lot Split RESOLUTI4N NO. 90-47 c. 3M Plans for Building Modifications. �: a � * d. Discuss MSP Expansion Issues - Invitation to Senate Advisory Council - Resolution Regarding Collaborative Community Airport Planning RESOLUTION NO. 90-48 e. Water System Study. f. Purchase of SOS Convenience Mart Property. g. Discuss Sibley Park Comfort_Station Bids. ** h. Custodian Appointment. ** i. Resolutions Honoring the Retirement of Howard Dahlgren RESOLUTION NO. 90-49 and Elizabeth Witt RESOLUTION NO. 90-50. ** j. Discuss Date for Council Budget Work Session. 9. Council Comments 10. Adjourn �p12,� --T �o-Qjl �.c.0+..w.�.a4�� — �e�w'C'�"`� ,�{, �u.:... a.,�n..�-A ��? �,Q.go.�,,� �'�i� -� Co.�a � Fm � ��.� �� ___. �,,�,,,.,�. _ - 4�.k , q�,` " 'vl,uo-P . � �- �.�...� o�--- � � , �,�� ' �'� ��:. � �, �;,�, �`' _ I�' - .-. �, .,�..�...�. � � '�'Q".�-"-" P�'�`'�? ' - ,�.�- � ��. �� `'� � � � � �,,�,. .;,,. �- - °-� Z . '0'� . �,�. �,�,�°.� �.' _ c�.� �.� Q.�,, - �,,,+�,°�" � �,,,�, y,�9. �, ,,,�,,.�,,u„� � �a-s � � �Q a� �+ha . - ��.-,�• -n. '�' 4 � � � r� � _ ` CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA JIILY 17, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Agenda Adoption - 4. Consent Calendar a. Acknowledgment of the June Treasurer's Report. b. Approval of Final Plat RESOLUTION NO. 90-43 and Developer's Agreement for Mendota Woods. c. RESOLUTION NO. 90-44 - Resolution Calling for Hearing on Assessment Rolls for Big Wheel Auto Site, Ivy Falls Creek Addition, North Ivy Hills 2nd Addition and Alice Lane Subdivision. d. Approval of the List of Contractors. e. Approval of the List of Claims End of Consent ,. 5. Public Comments * a. Mowing of Natural Green Areas. 6. Introductions a. Appointment of New Fire Personnel 7. Hearinct a. CASE NO. 90-19: ** 8:00 P.M. ** Delta Environmental Consultants - CUP - Amoco Station Accessory Structure RESOLUTION NO. 90-45 8. IInfinished and New Business a. CASE NO. 90-20: Sjoholm: CUP - RESOLUTION NO. 90-46 b. CASE NO. 90-21: Batesville Casket Company - Variance and Lot Split c. 3M Plans for Buili�ing Modifications. d. Discuss MSP Expansion Issues - Invitation to Senate Advisory Council - Resolution Regarding Collaborative Community Airport Planning RESOLUTION NO. 90-47 e. Water System Study. • � f. Purchase of SOS Convenience�Mart Property. * g. Discuss Sibley Park Comfort Station Bids. 9. Council Comments 10. Adjourn � ; CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA JIILY 17, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Agenda Adoption - 4. Consent Calendar a. Acknowledgment of the June Treasurer's Report. b. Approval of Final Plat RESOLUTION NO. 90-43 and Developer's Agreement for Mendota Woods. c. RESOLUTION NO. 90-44 - Resolution Calling for Hearing on Assessment Rolls for Big Wheel Auto Site, Ivy Falls Creek � Addition, North Ivy Hills 2nd Addition and Alice Lane Subdivision. d. Approval of the List of Contractors. e. Approval of the List of Claims End of Consent b 5. Public Comments 6. Introductions a. Appointment of New Fire Personnel 7. Hearina a. CASE NO. 90-19: ** 8:00 P.M. ** Delta Environmental Consultants - CUP - Amoco Station Accessory Structure RESOLUTION NO. 90-45 8. Unfinished and New Business a. CASE NO. 90-20: Sjoholm: CUP - RESOLUTION NO. 90-46 b. CASE NO. 90-21: Batesville Casket Company - Variance and Lot Split c. 3M Plans for Building Modifications. d. Discuss MSP Expansion Issues - Invitation to Senate Advisory Council - Resolution Regarding Collaborative Community Airport Planning RESOLUTION NO. 90-47 e. Water System Study. 9. Council Comments 10. Adjourn - 0 ti � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 17, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administrator SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for July 17th Council Meeting Attached, please find revised agenda number two. Four items have been added to the agenda (**). Additional information has been submitted for an item already scheduled on the agenda (*). 3. Agenda Adoption It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda printed on green paper. 4f. Approval to Refund House Movinq Escrow., See attached memo from Civil Engineer Klayton Eckles. 4g. Receive Petition Opposinq Utility Extension - Furlonq Addition. See attached petition. 8b. CASE NO. 90-21: Batesville Casket Company. See attached memo from Planning Consultant Tim Malloy. 8h. Custodian Appointment. See attached memo from Administrative• Assistant Kevin Batchelder. 8i..Resolutions Honorinq the Retirement of Howard Dahlgren and Elizabeth Witt. See attached Resolutions. 8j. Discuss Date for Council Budqet Work Session. Verbal Discussion - City Administrator Tom Lawell. MTL:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 16, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis a r SIIBJECT: Add On Agenda for July 17th Council Meeting Enclosed, please find a revised agenda for the upcoming July 17th Council meeting. Due to the addition of three items, some of which supported by several pages of background material, staff felt it may be helpful for you to receive this information in advance of the meeting. As always, please call with any questions you may have. 3. AQenda Adoption It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda printed on pink paper. 5a. Public Comments - Mowing of Natural Green Areas See attached memo from Code Enforcement Officer Richard Gill. 8f. Purchase of SOS Convenience Mart Propertv See attached memo from Public Works IIirector Jim Danielson. 8g. Discuss Sibley Park Comfort Station Bids See attached memo and bid tabulation from Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander. MTL:kkb 6 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �� TREASIIRER'S REPORT, JUNE, 1990 DAROTA COIINTY STATE BANK Checking Account 5% Savings Account 5 1/2 C.D. Rep 6.6% Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. CHEROREE STATE BANK C.D. due 9/4/90 @ 7.95% Savings Cert. 8/28/90 @ 7.5% Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. BALANCE $ 16,012.82 503.94 55,000.00 71,516.72 646,000.00 100,000.00 350,000.00 13,952.59 363,952.59 600,000.00 100,000.00 U.S. Treasurey 8 5/8% 5-15-93 Notes 498,671.88 $500,000 yield 8.7280 COLLATERAL $746,000.00 $700,000.00 Value 5.31.90 (est.) U.S. Treasurey Money Mkt 1,351,328.12 (1,721,000.00) Gov't., Securities Fund 1,200,000.00 (1,762,000.00) TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $3,485,469.31 Funds Available 12/31/89 6,026,184.56 6/30/89 3,372,191.00 Rates Monev Market June 29 Bank 6.60% Fid 7.91% LES:kkb 7-11-90 � �f � I CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 13, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admin'st or FROM: Klayton H. Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets Mendota Woods (Patrick) Job No. 8922 Improvement No. 89, Project No. 7 DISCUSSION• Attached are the Mendota Woods Developer's Agreement and final plat for Council approval. The developer has paid the park dedication fee and signed the agreement. The final plat is completed with the exception of a street name change. The developer wishes to name the street Arbor Court rather than Ryan Road. Staff does not see any prob- lems with the proposed name change. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends Council authorize the Mayor and City Admin- istrator to execute the developer's agreement and approve the final plat subject to receiving the plat with the street name correction. ACTION RE4UIRED: If Council concurs with the staff recommendation they should pass a motion authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to execute the developers agreement and adopting Resolution No. 90- , RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR MENDOTA WOODS. KHE:dfw [ � City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 90- RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR MENDOTA WOODS �' 3 WHEREAS, a final plat for Mendota Woods has been submitted to the Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said final plat. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the final plat of Mendota Woods submitted at this meeting is hereby approved. 2. That the appropriate City officials be and they are hereby authorized to execute the final plat on behalf of the City of Mendota Heights. Adopted by the City Council of the City of•Mendota Heights this 17th day of July, 1990. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk r . .--� /�'�, i � CONTRACT' FOR SINGLE. FAMILY DEVEIAPMr.�v'T . Jab No. 8922 Imp. Nn.� 89-7 This Agr�eament, made artd entered inta tha.s G� day af , 1990, by and between the Ca.ty c►F Mendata Heights, Dakot Caunty, Minneso�a, (hereina�ter called the "Ci.ty"j an� Sfiephen and Jana Patrick, 73T Mendot� Heights Road, Mendota Heights, MN 55120 and' Bill Lent:=ch,�J9E3 Narth Dal�, St. Paul, MN 55117 (hereinafter called the "Dfaveloper"j. W I T N E S S E T Ii: �fi�EREAS, D�veloper proposes a plat_for a single family develop- ment in Mendota Heightss to be known as Mendota Woods, consisting of 11 single familp lats on apnraximately 13 acres located south oE Mendota Fieights Road,-east of Dodd Road; and t�iiiERE�S,"public services are needed by the Developer Srom �;�ndaLa Heights in order to proceed with said development. NOW TH�IdEF4RE, it is hereUy agrcecl by aad bef:ween the two parti�s as follows: 1. In the event tha� the City initiates litiga�ion to ent'orce per.formance af the Developer' s ab2 ir�ations hereunr�er, �he City shall be entitled to reimbursement of all costs and attorney fees incurred in connection�therewitl�, whether incurred prior to or after entry of judgment. 2. Deve].oper wi11 petition the City for needed public improve- mez�.ts (Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Watermains, and ' Streets). Developer agrees to pay $165U.00 escrow �o i;he City as per Ordinance No. 15Q3. Esorow to be rerunded upon su�cessful campletion of a prciject. 3. Developer will pravide at�no cast ta the City aIl needed teriparary construction easements to install said improve- ments and those permanent, right of way and easements, necessary for said public improvements. . 4. De�veloper will pro�eed imm�diately to consraission a r�gis- ter.ed land surveyor Lo place and ma�ntain enouga lc,t corners so that street center lxnes and all utilities cu:� b� ].ocated by City stafE. 5. Developer acknowledges �Ghat there wi.11 be park con�ribution due to the City as per Ordinance No. 341., Seetion 6 a� amezded by Resolution 80- 16, That contribution, is to be $600 per lot or $6,000.00 and i� payable at the time tlie Maxar signs the �'inal plat. ,� 6. City agrees;"�`�� complete the street and � ulevard grading and � �--._ the Developer or lot owner shall complete the grading of " ' � ir,.dividual lots. ' 7. Grading operations may be coinpleted in phases (i.e. individ- ua.l lotsj by the DevelQper/Homebuilder. Each lot must be submitted for approval. To gain approval, the Developer/Homebuilder provide a grading plan that�shows at a:minimum erosion control measures, the existing and pro- pc�sed lot corner elevations, elevations for garage floor and first floor, and elevations for all breaks in grade for each lot. Also a$1,000 escrow shall accompany each phase plan. Ariy change in a phase of the grading shall require reapprov- al. The escrow shall be returned upon satisfactory comple- tion of the grading operations. The Developer agrees to notify Lot Owners/Homebuilders of these requirements. 8. If and when there is an excessive buildup of mud or dirt on existing City streets as'a result of building operations, the Developer shall have the affected streets swept�by mechanical means, at the direction of the City. 9. The Developer/Homebuilder will be responsible for repairing damage to public utilities incurred as a result of building canstruction or private utility installation. Therefore the Developer shall notify the Homebui.lder/Lot Owner at the time o!° sale of a lot of this stipulation. 10. It is the City's desire to cause the least amount of dis- turbance to the existing stand of oak trees on the site. The City has commissioned an oak wilt specialist to provide r�:commendations for protecting the oak trees during grading operations and construction. The Developer agrees to follow these recommendations in all activities on the site, and ayrees to notify new lot owners and/or hamebuilders of these recommendatiaris. 11.- The Developer agrees to include notifications of aircraft noise attenuation construction requirements in the restric- tive covenants on all lots in the subdivision. All homes in subdivsion must be built to the City's S.T.C. Code Require- ments.The Developer shall provide a copy of these covenants t� the City for review at the time the final plat is signed b�� the Mayor. pC--�c-JP�n- /�LS�q��s to /•,�c�4Y /+�c. N�� r a�,Z.S �r -fie Zouw� ��a� n,a-.�rF.�r��r S�rawwn��,..�y� �c-v�i.o�� 12. If at anytime the Developer is not in compliance with this ayreement, the City reserves the right to correct the areas of non-compliance after giving the Developer 48 hours no- tice. All costs associated with making the correctiona shall be charged to the Developer. 13. A� the Developer actually consists of several individuals with varying degrees of involvement, the Developer shall designate one person as the legal Developer Representative. Ttie Developer Representative is assumed to represent the , .�. iriterest of.� he Developers, and the Cit�:, shall take actions -., ., ac:cordinglyY_ The City will direct all+g,�estions, informa- -" Y tion and requirements to the Developer Represeritative�. Idotification to the Developer Representatcive shall be .con- sidered notification to the•Developer as a whole. The City will not act on Developer's request that has not been pre- sented via the Developer Representative. The official Developer Representative is listed below. If the �eveloper wlshes to redesignate the Developer Representative a notifi- cation signed by all those persons signing the Developer's Agreement stating this fact shall be delivered to the City. I�ESIGNATED AEVELOPER REPRESENTATIVE ��' � . _ . I. � i !,C'�' �� /o,/Z� . ,- CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHT5 Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor M. Thomas Lawell, City Administrator DEVELOPERS �� a DECLARATION OF COVENANTS� CONDZTIANS AND RESTRICTIDrS FOR MENDOTA [�IOODS This Declarati.on is made this 3rd day of July, �1990 bp Wil.liam M. Lentsch, Stephen Patrick and Jana Patrick, a joint venture �own as "Mendota Woods" (Declarant) Whereas, Declarant is the owner of the real property described in Article I of this declaration, and is desirous of subjecting such real property to the restrictions, covenants, reservations, easements, liens and charges herein- after set forth, each and all of which is and are for the benefit of such property and for each owner thereof, and shall inure to the benefit and pass with such property, and each and every parcel thereof, and sha11 apply to and bind the successors in interest, and any owner thereof; Now therefore, Declarant hereby declares that the real property described and referred to in Article I hereof is and shall be held, transf erred, sold and conveyed subject to the conditions, restrictions, covenants, reservations, easements, liens and charges hereinafter set forth. ARTICLE I PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THIS DECLARATION 1.1 The real property which is and shall be held and conveyed, transferred and sold subject.to this Declaration is located in the6City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, and is more particularly described as follows: ARTICLE II GENERAL PURPOSES OF DECLAi2ATI0N 2.1 Declarant has had this Declaration prepared and recorded as part of a general plan for developing the Property into a subdivision of single-family lots (collectively the "Lots" and individually a"Lot") for improvement and sales to owner-occupants. 2.2 the Property is subjected to the covenants, restrictions, conditions, reservations, liens and charges hereby decTared to insure the best use and most appropriate development and improvemant of each Lot; to protect the owners of Lots against such improper use of surround3.ng Lots as wi11 depreci.ate th the value of their Lots; to preserve as far as practicle the natural beauty pf the property; to guard against the erections on the Property of poorly designed or proportioned structures; and structures built of improper or unsuitable materials; to obtain harmonious color schemes; to insure the highest and best use and development of the Property, with appropriate locations of such homes on the Lots; to prevent haphazard and inharmonious improvements of Lots; to secure and maintain proper setbacks from the streets,and adequate free spaces between structures; and in gerneral to provide adequately for a quality type of improvement in the Property, and thereby to enhance the value of investments made by the purchasers of Lots. r � ARTICLE III 3.1 No buildi.ng shall be erected, placed or altered on any Lot until tha building plans and specifications and a si.te plan �howing the locatian of such building have been approved in writing by Declarant as to COT2�OiiIli.��' and harmouy of externa7, design wi.th �,xisting structures on �Ghe property, and as ' to l.ocata.an of the building with respect �o topography and f inished ground e2evation. If Dec].arant fails to approve or disapprove such design and location within th3.rty days after plans and speci£3.catians and a site plan have been submitted to Declarant, such approval shall deemed to have been granted as of the thirty-first day Eollowing submission to Declarant. Declaxant shall not be liable ta anyone in damages whn has su'bmiCteci plans for approval, or �o any owner by reason of mi.stake in �udgement, negligence, ar nonfeasance of itself, its agents, or employees arising out of or in connaction with the appraval ar disapproval of any such plans. 3.2 No building shall be iacated less than thirty (30} fee� from the front line of Che Lat nor less than thirty (30) feet from the rear of the Lot 1.ine. No such buiiding shall be located less than ten {1Q} feet from any side lot lina except a garage which shall be na less"than five (5) f eet from a.�y side lat line. 3.3 No noxious or offensive trade or activity sha1,1 be permitted on or to escape from any Lot, nor shall anything be donE thereon which may become an annoyance or nuisance. � 3.4 Na�buiZding or strnctnre of a temporary character and na trailer, basement �ent, shack, garage or out-building sha11 be used at any time as a residential ciwelli.ng on anp Lot, ei.�her tempararily or germanently, A motorboat, houseboat or other similar wa�er-borne vehicle may be maintained, stored or kept on a Lot oniy i.f i.t i.s no greater than twenty {2Q} feet in length, and ei.ther housed completely within a structure whi.ch has been approved by Declarant pursuant to paragraph 3.1, or stored on a dr3.veway in a locatian that does not iuterf ere with pedestrian or vehiculax traffic on the property. No recreatianal vehicles, No cammercial vehicles, tanks, or commercial equipment o£ any kind shall be located�, stored ar parked on any building Lot. � 3.5 No primarp residential structure shaZl ba permitted on any Lot if tha habitable floor area thereof, exclusive of basements, porches and garages is l.ess than fourteen hundred (1,400) square feet in the casa af a ane-sCory structure or less than twenty-five hundred (2,500) square feet in the case of a one and ane-ha1f, two ar two and one-half story structure or as agproved. by Declarant. 3.6 Na animals or pauZtry of any kind other than comman hause pets such as dogs and cats, with the e�cception of no Pit Bull Terriers, s'hall be kept ox maintained on any gart of the Property. 3.7 No fence, wall, or hedge sha11 b� parnaitted_to..extend beyond tha minimu� build�i.ng ��tback lines established herein e�ccept upon approval bq becl.arant as provided in Paragraph 3.1. 3.8 No building or structure shall be constructed, alCered or maintained on any I,at without a garage which garage shall contain space far at least two and not more than three cars. 3.9 No building or structure shall be constructed., altered or maintained on any Lot unless it has a driveway from the street running ta the garage, which driveway m must be of sufficient area ta park at least tczo cars entixely of� the street. 3.10 No signs af any kind shall be displayed to public view an any Lot eaccept a hause number sign, ar name sign, of nat mare than one square foot, or except ane sign of no� more than three square feet advertising the property for sale; provided, however, that this shall not agply to advertising signs placed on any lot by Dec].arant. 3.11 No trash recepticles, ar garbage cans shall be perm�itted to be p�.aced outside a building or structure, unless hidden by an attractive screen of suitabie height, or unless sunken to ground Ievei in a hole I.ined with permanent cribbing. _ ; 3.12 All utility connection faci.l3ties and services shall be underground. r 3.13 No exterior towers or antennas of any kind shall be constructed, modified, or permitted on the graund of anp Lot. Reasonable television . antennas are permitted on dwellings ox garages. 3.14 No Lot may be further subdivided without writ�en approval of the Declarent pursuant �o Paragraph 3«1. � t � 3.15 Mu1t:Lple family dwellings are not permitted., anly singe family residences, � I i 3.16 All residences mus� compZy with local ordix}ances pertaining to being locaCed in airport noise Zone Faur (Least res�rictive.) I.�. triple glazed glass windotas, central air conditioning, minimum attic insulation levels. A copy of the ordinancesiis attached, { ' , i ARTICLE IV SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST TO DECLARANT 4.1 At any time during the period in which Declarant owns an interest in the property or any part thereof, but i.n any event no later than the date as of which Declarant no longer owns an interest in the property or any part thereof, Declarant shall appoint an architectural control committee (Hereinafter the "committee" composed of no less than three but no more than five persons, at least two of whom shall be owners of Lots who purchased such Lots for their own residential use. In the event of death or resignation of any member of the Committee, the remaining member(s) shall have full authority to designate a representative with like authority. Neither Declarant nor the representative members of the Committee shall be entitled to any compensation for services performed pursuant to this Declaration. 4.2 If Declarant appoints a Committee, then such Committee shall have all of the rights and obligations of "Declarant" under this Declaration, and Declarant itself shall have no further obligations, responsibility or liability whatsoever hereunder. 4.3 �`he rights hereby reserved to Declarant sha11 apply with equal force and effect to Declarant's successors and assigns in the event ownership and control of the rights hereby reserved pass from the Declarant (whether by reason of the appointment of a receiver, assignment for the benef it of creditors, bankrupcy, sale under legal process of any kind, transfer of the ownership of a majority interest in Declarant or otherwise), and the rig'ht to enforce the covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements set forth in this Declaration shall immediately pass, without further action by Declarant or any other party, to Declarant�s successor who shall within thirty (30) flays of such passage, if such appointments have not already occurred, appoint all members of the Committee in the manner provided in Paragraph 4.1 hereof, as if it were in fact "Declarant." ARTICLE V OTHER PROVISIONS 5.1 This Declaration shall run with the land and shall be bi.nding on all parties and all persons claiming under them until Januarq 1, 2002, at which time this Declaration shall automatically be extended for successive periods of ten (10) years unless by vote of Declarant, the Committee or any successor in interest to either of the foregoing it is agreed to change this Declaration in whole or in part. 5.2 If the owner of any Lot or his/her heir, assign or other successor in interest shall violate or attempt to violate th3.s Declaration or any provision hereof, it shall be lawful for any other person or person's owning a Lot as well as for Declarant, the Committee or any successor in interest to either of the foregoing, to prosecute a proceeding at law or in equity against the person or persons violating or attempting to violate this Declaration, either to prevent him/her/them from doing so or to recover damages for such violation, or both. 5.3 Invalidation of any provision of this Declaration or any part hereof by judgements or court order shall not affect any of the provisions hereof, which shall remain in force and effect to the fullest extent possible. _ - • •, 0 � IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has hereunto set its hand �his day of , 19 . BY• BY: BY: 5ubscribed and sworn before me by and this day of , 19 . � I have read and understand al1 provisions of the foregoing covenant and hereby agrea to abide by a13. such gravisions. , � FROM: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO Mayor, City Council and City Admini James E. Danielso3� Publia Works Directo'r July 13, 1990 SUBJECT: Assessment� Rolls: Big Wheel Auto - Job Na. 8808, Imp. 88-3 Ivy Falls Creek - Job No. 8704, Imp. 87-2 North Ivy Hills 2nd Add. - Jab No. 8220, Imp. 88-6 Alice Lane - Job No. 8911, Imp. 89-3 I}ISCUSSI4N • There are four projects that need ta be assessed in 299�, Big Wheel Auto Site Improvements, Ivy Falis Creek Addii�ion, Narth Ivy Hills 2nd Additian and the Alice Lane Subdivision. The costs for these projec�s are currently being tabul.ated and spread into indivi.dual assessments, however they were not completed as of agenda time on Friday. These individual assessment rolls and e�lanation� of how they were arrived at will. be distributed to Council as soon as they are completed, we are trying ta have them ready to hand out Tuesday evening. Because of publicatiort deadlines wa are asking that Council authorize staff to publish for the public hearing� for the Attgust 22st City Council x�eeting tanight. Staff will then have the August 7th meeting before the hearings to di�trib- ute the rolls and discuss them before the public hearings. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that abave prajeats be schedul.ed meeting. AGTION REQUIRED: the assessment roll hearings for the far August 27, 1990 City CounciZ If Gounci3 desires to implement the staff recammendatian they should pass a motion adapting Resolutian Na. 90- , RE50- LUTION CALLING FOR HEARING {}N ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR BIG WHEEL AUTO SITE (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PRQJECT Nd. 3, IVY FALLS CREEK ADDITION {IMPRQVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NQ. 2} NORTFi IVY �iILLS 2ND ADDSTION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. 6) .AND ALICE LANE SUBDIVISION {IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 3� SMPROVEMENTS {IMPRCJVEMENT NQ. 88, PROJECT NO. 3). , :� � .��i _ �; � City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 90 - RESOLUTION CALLING FOR HEARING ON A5SESSMENT ROLLS FOR BIG WHEEL AUTO SITE (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88-3) IVY FALLS CREEK ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO. 2) NORTH IVY HILLS 2ND ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. 6) ALICE LANE SUBDIVISION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 3) IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, contracts have heretofore been let for the construction of the following described improvements: The construction of sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water, street, curb and gutter improvements to serve the Big WHeel Auto Site, Ivy Falls Creek Addition, North Ivy Hills 2nd Addition and Alice Lane Subdivision (which improvements have heretofore been known and designated as Improvement No. 88, Project No. 3, Improvement No. 87, Project No. 2, Improvement No. 88, Project No. 6, and Improvement No. 89, Project No. 3) and WHEREAS, the construction of said improvements has been substantially completed; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the aid and assistance of the City Engi- neer, was previously directed by the City Council to prepare the as- sessment rolls for the above described improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has notified the City Council that a proposed assessment roll for the above described improvements has been complet- ed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That a public hearing on said proposed assessment rolls shall be held at the Mendota Heights City Hall at 1101 Victoria Curve, in the City of Mendota Heights, on Tuesday, August 21, 1990, at 7:45 o'clock P.M or as soon as possible thereafter. 2. That the City Clerk, with the aid and assistance of the City Attorney, is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and attend to the publication and mailing of the necessary notices of said hearing, all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17th day of July, 1990. - CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk , � LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL JULY 17, 1990 General Contractors License Butler Housing Ken's Roofing Company Rem-Con, Inc. Sandvik Construction Co., Inc. Excavatinq Licenses Danner Landscaping Ingram Excavating, Inc. July I7, 1990 TO: Mar�or and City Council CLAIMS LIST SUMMARY: Total Claims Significant Claims W. St. Pau1 (Z990 dispatching) Unusual Claims Bond Payments American Nation First Trust Norwest GMH Asphalt Park construction Kodet Architect Park Bldg $ 1,184,577 51, 283 157,600 704,000 I47,940 92,532 2,534 J Y Lepc lu-eam Dept SU-Rd�Bridge � �� } . � . , .. , 15-Engr 60-Utilities ,-,};;_ i , _ _ . 23 3u1 133m 7/17/90 C;alms L3st � -.,, , 20-Police 70-Parks Fage 1 +•�c ;�:,,�;*�3,:7 � �'r1 3Y:�2 r"ita t11ty of t*eirtyaLa 1-;�lgrr�s 30-Fire 80-PZanning •- . • . rl � ' 40-CEO 85-RecycZing - c TPrnp �Yrer_k Jdurnlaer Y ) P77Fi' L.";7PCM Nun7ner^ 'JEntic�^ :darne iycc�acir•,i: LarJe .. 1=iYt4T in:i '-=i': 2 �..,k,-c"lh�..p?� i TC�tclZS 32ll1('J �77E+C.k }V1t711bP_Y` i Ternp f]�H+ck ttcrmber � ,� fice Ma7^dw2r�E �`3-4��•-tchi:tL.'�-Ihv� 3'cta25 TPli:p L17PC;ii Niirv�er� ._ Te1n� fneck 3Vzrr,rber^ � � + . . . • . 3 fimer^ScarJ Nat3c�r•ra2 F-•anX ti;:-�r4�6--�Z+t2+i�-f[+� ' � 3 Amer.2cai� 7vatlo»aS L'ra�,k 4�_'A4`�"L9�iy_.1Z;a+ ' 3 fimer.carr iJat2crra3 f+al,k �i-;=51` 3 Funer.ica» ;r'atl�,na; L�arrk tZ�1.._l.��a�:. 7 c' , 7c�t:rls Ternp Lhecn• ;Vumber^ 3 . , Temp �»er_k tvtrmver + <r . 4 i*arYc.n Rsctrmarr �7-�r;y,._=`�+-��G�2--�7,� . � Tat a 1 s Tenr�+ t't�ecX h+ttn7ber %t !" __,.. Ternp �Y�ecsi. ?Virmt�tr_. . . . _.:, ,. .r„ � , 5 £;rai^d of YJater� �Ccrnrn2ss2crrers YS-�'r4;="'..,-3i:,-•3i7 � � . � PToarc3 oT Water t.ornm2sslai�ers ¢+0-H��•-�4+�Z+-�+h =.1 Sr.a>^d a� dJate>� �ornmissacr�ers 4�:�-•=f�r;.-`'.�-31a2s-79Z+ �� 7c.t�715 Ten;p F:t�ecH iVttmber^ .. � Sefnp L`7�eck Nctrnbe.r Es t, E:ity ci' bJ 5't fiaatl g+1-4��i'S-��=i7-��Z - 6 trAty a� w L-rt �`�u2 n`�1•-4;�T:5-fi3�h-3'¢� 2'� • Tc..ta2s 3ernp �i7erx N��mber^ 6 YP.lii� Lf7PCk 1VttIObPY' 7 7 �cnrt2t�entaY L�:tUSev.2S3ati ��i-• i�=`�2'�Q•-6:ciL+-�;=1 V 90-Animal ControZ iarnr,teJ'rY: s firrnaun � ,...� 7,.ti SVC ._...o�' :�. ;=7 "3 /� m3 sc GL�.f y5 ��t. 3%: • ;-� , . , �i+}.:S+I . . '� , � �' . ., S� t�ds - , :J'.?s SL�'L�. Y9�[ c _ - . � t: fJ t7O5 7� 7 Q�r�r. iZ+iZt JJ ba5 � ?5, L��L:�. a'"4^. Eira tads i:�, �7.+¢��Z+. �+m'�ci^ 3 :t �'is 6d:sL+. i2+J" . . � ` ' 4. ' +.� . , ,- � ffle Slbiey fiark 7t,�r.1� %b4. 1:J . :y • •.r . � . . , • ..':f� � . > ':'.°i .-i� ... �.�in:- ' _ .. i� ��_ . . Ju» 5vc l� s . _ �6. 3.3 y • + Jt�» svc -, . . rr;. „ C- : . 37.Y��_ . • "C:� C-..-.. .� 3un svc i.�3 S.�i�� JJ , 1 S�]�2t d3 sp svc �13� p+7�. 93 � 195G!+ d1 sp svc -t!T t��+7�� :12 5 ;�E'��;. C�3 � . � JLfY SVC �.35 J• • 't ',i��i,_ c .! . i:l .7U1 1494.'+ i:T�1M5 LISt.:•� - r��•.c�<1 ;-. y�s�1 F>^3 � 1� 3'< fiM �.9 ty c P t�enduL-a He1 �h't s 7f5AT.? t:J'JE.'Ci�C NttfiJi7EY' 7 'f�mp_ firicac],k t4ttmber ver•�c:c.r^ ;aarne Accc.zrrrs �c�dP ?��r�i:1 rrrvntat ��373X Pvi 5] i.r�7 +hl -•4'c?�l'L:+-'E i�-:�r..; ;9 • ;'ct22 s Ternp �rieck ;dirrnY,er^ 7 TFMj] T•h@CH 7l'CtTrJbP_1^ E! � 3tev1 n �i�SY.et^ +e'+2 -dr337-�+.:,fn-�%ti'+ 9 TctaAs TPrnfs CnPCH tvcir,�ber t5 Fe;ap �nec;c Nitrnber � � fczrr^tya>�d t�rar^r3c.tt �1-<i��2�2s...�+,:f0-;_�.R 5 Tata3s 7em{s ��eck 1aun�ber� 9 Ye�,Tp �rier_H Nc�mt�er 272s 1� DaY�i nre� � Sharcl l ctw t�tsa» E'+i -?2`= 1-1 3:�-Sf4 • :t�7+ !]af>lor•en ;�riard2�w L�t�a» �+1--4��+-•3��-•I�TT+ ,.. �=7h . . . _ . , . . _ . W Tc.tals 7'em¢ iriecJ: 7Ur.rn7ber^ 1�+ ?e+rnp Check Ncrmber� � 2 . " , r. ._. ..:i 1 2 1lakata i:c.unty Tec]? Snst �29 -�r�4T�ti'r-�+;_,=`Q �� •- - 21 ' T�L a i s Tem�+ Cf�Pck 1V+in�bei^ 11 7ernp �Yiec?r Number^ 1s� 2;= f5arfriei^ LandscaQi ng 77+1 -�r3��,-it::,t�-��1 -- • � ., l: , . . . . 2:^_ 7ota 3 s --3en�p Lne. ck rva�mi�er . � ,. � �•.. 9 � . ,. ��, , _ , .- _. ie�np �neck T;crrrtber^ 13 13 1-2 rst Tr^ust 1 �r--h4.:,6-¢+�C�-��h Y 3 F2 r�st Yr�+st Y 4�-'i�9'�'+:.,--��ri+2+-•�S � 3 #= 2 rst 5r•ust 3�4-�c2E.--�Qs�+-•ini.a 1� fi2 rsL Trust 2 1•-•49.:,�-��2'r�-¢;fi 13 f2 r^st Trt�s: 11 -�:_�6-tD�D1--tZ+P+ Y 3 1= 3 7"s't 'Yt`trsi 2 1•-4�F� h'..-�QrL.'�VYt+-�2'L.'} 13 i'3i•St 3'rtls: i�r-44'✓'6-Q�LAit+-$�L3 Lc�ramerrs s .� LI S 54'C � t`teaver^ zrapplrrg . _ • �"S Fag2 2 .. ..:�. _ . � r _ ' - - r,� 3i7r7G�it» � :�, z3� Y Y . `S'Zt 3c E. 2iiC 3:= �. 6tt h r� . � ,� } .. fie �a>^locfc .� � ._�, ,t 3Y.�+� , ) - .:).. Y••� f ' ) .Jtrrr� >^eta3ner^ �� +�'•�.'��:• �. ` �•.�' Surt extr,�s ' 35. B9 - �� ,,� . : rPsl . .....- . . , _ 1 i ti41i. S9 • : , , • \� ' , ..7.. _ . : u r �� •_ � • _ . _ , � : :-P.._"= .., . -,. ,i� . � i ) --- -June- trr�g .. __.___ _ � 7ln.Y+it� . . � . �..� , , .. , :f.Yr ., .�. - � . , IiL. 7Y2 - .. . c ... - .. ...� SUd - • :.ri'.. �lA , :� . ...< .i. .ii ......___. � .,,. � . • 3i�. Y�� . � . t.. :.`' t C. . i: :., x��' . t: .a.. i 1" 5� .. ..... J`i . /::� 1 . . ':'l�_ _. .. .. �.. � . . . _ _ 7f bds ;=� St2.t�. �� ?y bns c?:,i �Z+IItTt+. i£�h 7f Uds ,^_:'3.38 75: t3t75 4� � IIc�p+. F+II+ 7� t�ris s?�3. �J 7i= v� s �r, 1 3 i��+. 721�T� 7.?. bds +,'s L":��ff+. �ifC+ .__' ' 4_ _ " _ _ .�__ _ _ _" � . � 5 i' ' 13 ,7 u ] 2 9'9L.'+ 1 P'7^I 1 3 q � 3 1�h1 7amp i�her_k rve+rt�r+er 13 Ternp. . z.; reck Ncirni�er� Ve»dcn^ SJarne y� t=.tr��t 7'rcrst 13 F] rai: 7>^ust ; � t=1 rst 'r�^usr. 2 3 �1 rst Yi,ust 73 1=1t^SL' Y)^ttst 2 �ti � Tc.taks Tern{1 �Y�er_k lvi�rnber Tc:mp T:.nc?r_k )vurnt+er . ytr it! %�21`S'G' ST^t1SG 1<r F1+^St T1^tlSt , �4 �irst Trust d9 1=1rst..c7'rust'_. _. _ 1�4 f2l^st 7>�trst 7 4 F=.t 1^5�: TY`USi: s ri �2 rst Trerst 14 f= F 7^sL 7r^t� st 24 Fl rst "irusi; �� • 24 F!i^St 7t^ttst •' itf �2Y'S� �7'L75'� _ 14 F.trst Tr«st a �t� � • . . .. � . . Tatats �'er,�p Cnecu hurnber Yemp �t�e?r_k JVumbe�^ �� 1✓ �'3y^5t...�t^ttst'- :+v . •: 9:� f=trst� 7rust � �r 1:, Ftrst Srcist- -•� 1� F1t^st� Trust' .. .�:v � � �2 rst 7rarst 1;� filrst "it^ust �L!+ •• . . _ .t_. . 7c2als 7emp ihecM t+;umber� t. . _-,� • . .. Trmrn� �»eck tvun�ber Y G 2� i3hJN As{�ha1L �crp 2F� L�17t9 1=H5(Jf7c-'tlt LCl^(J -- �._ ."k«.. .,_ , _ .. . .,�.` . _ . . . . 7ctais 3emp �Y�ecx NtIf11hP_T� = . 7EAJ(3 L'.hPC7'• 1`1UfAbPY` ' ! 1� 1? t3e>,er�1 �c�rnr,z+.tYi3cat�ic�rrs t:lalnls LSst � - �ity 4P JQar'�dc�t� Y.elghtS F,ccaunt Coce 2 9-44;5:�^•:Z�7t+i_h-i?rQl i 4-�t"'-_`�-CY>2�Y�-G.'+�ir 1 %v--44:�F_.•-•�+04"•-•�.:y.". 1 �J- )�}✓."i-C�+0�-t2lh 9 4-4'`''_e�-m�t�-Q+�21 1� c � -4f � .:i^II76 �i.�-•�.�1Z� :t �i-'4+i':.�-�2+�2'�¢;-•�L.'+ 3La-�:•,:.n.,-t2�fC�T -tZr3 2 9-9ri:�8�-�lD4�41-iL� . .. � . �3-44�s-��2�-4��a 3Y9•-4�:iF--LhYC+'� -•i�2� 3 �r•-4;=c^6-��L'ti2�-�2�:� 3 7-•49:1� -k'�t2+•-a2�.`+ 37—�IslJJ—LyYA��IL� � 3%-4�?F -�4r¢t4�-•'S�in 7� 1 —`i � i � . tb1 -•1;?=f^e 1 �r T:�-44:��.-ic�'Y.�21-�tz _. . 7:1-44�G-�h�h-•�ff+ . . 16-49:�:�fi-tb��--OY� - --•- 74-44�Ei-•�T+4�12�-•4+gr ., , .!•: `JJ-'+Ft{✓:J-�%2r�-Yt7t. ` f;'`✓-fi9:i .F.�-'Q+�ZttZr-�R$+ 1✓ R . �. .. . .. �. .. . '�`.j-tF�iG�-72+i�ff ^t�iZ ',2h�-496i�-ff+Y�O-•Q�Y+ .. ��.ti.. S6 . , YC i --i1.3�'• � -+t✓t� -3�2 � • ,r:: - , `� Paae 3 *�;; _..,._, ,��• r , . . � ��.mmen: s Firnacrr.i: ,.-� J i .� iir �� .�t' ��c �':i� �L��r.� 7w. bds .''.�J.3a :'fa bC75 `3:�?..`.�� 'y"� ��, aas ��:,, ¢�s�. �� %E tds �� 3.3TJ . r __�_____.�_. �� . . . 3 ".`'c'`'. � 75:1. �+� - 4 .% , i ,i 77 bds , . . +is 3:�th_ �t�4 Il 7'7 bds . 3F� 6�LA. L.��+ �� L',105 ' Sy JJ�, ,2rn r� 'I'r. Uds _ . _ . . . - , : 6, 1ith3. ��2+ _ ::� ; .._ . . �. � `'-' ?7 bds SP+3. ��✓ 77 bn s Y,'r3�f . �2+tt+ -.� ; 7 bds :='�3. :33 ' 7t'� LtCs 3�� :i&?� :l>h � - 7'g rrJg , f3t2L��D.a'�P _..� ' - � � 7 . 'l:J 17ds ' z='.`"'�- 3� - �- bG pyrnts �i ✓� �tL�n. A'+�Z . „- . • . b�, pyrats � • ., , :'2,:�r rt+�h+D. �zr�cr ° . �� ----_"' ---. _ +._. . i,. .. lt. ' X0E,�7j3.?f_+ ti _ . �...: ._. _. 5�;, i' . J .. .-... �.,.i»' 1 � •K i ��L=E+'� ' �i�.Y'• . _ .:� _ � .'"v53 bds ,•.�r,_ .<5... _ �'<`-' .., bttis$ff+tA.B�� . .:._. : . �''•'J f:.y i� t7;3 bd5 'J'd ' 27�L�c.:�t2+ _��i3`-C't - - • �3 T1 f rids . .___ .__.__._._ 15s �?:5. �t2+ ' t �, �'1� K�J t7d5 ^r��A.�. 1•��.E,.. �:�.i�331fr37.J� t.. -til �..�.('^ a.-1.E.7�,- .. 86 bds 1:�t2�i �Z+�- �t2 c'�F bCs 6;�s A37.':�*Z�r,�� ; • C. i ... ... .� . . . . ' �_t•._ :.t44� 49'c.:A2� :;. _ . .,._-� . i ._ _.� . ' , �...trt�. - .� > �'_ �� . ,. ..a .tl . : r.; �� - PYtnt 1 93-6�+ �:��•'Tg4:3��<_�. ;'' �c:t,r .:.�1 , pymt r^_ r39-fi7'i -• �r87 777, �2 r.�A y -Z .'Cc. c! _ :�i -------•-- xi+�'�G --- - -- .9.�s ;'3i.:. GE . �. �.•�-• . .� � .. . .� . ,: �� - _' • . , , �.r . . : � •,�+ _ � paner rprs .'�1.:1�2 � ' : . . -� . :, _ .. 13 Jt�2 13?�+ C2alms L2st vF �;��'?i��,ry`' � ,_ fr2 11 : � 1 At+f C1 ty c�f 14�+rrtlata Ne2 gT�ts T�mF� i=Yrer_k 7Vc�m�er� 1! 7E+rn�. Lh�Ci{ Pc�AP. 4 h". . , y,, i :' , . y Nuurber� b'e»oa�, rvarne iuccc�cint �ode �cmraents ;=,mounv .-,� 27 i3en�ral i:omrnur�ic�tians Q+1-h33�h-•9�r2:-3r2'+ � panei^ �^ars . ["T_�� :7 L;enPra] L:C.fi71'iiLt7'r9CRtjCYrS �2i-<i33f�-�r��2•-3�.'� pager r•�r^s �J.'.J'� r„ ;7 tierJe�^a.i �aramunScatl�i•r5 k'i2�4:�{W�r-�y.:�k,'-345 paoei^ i^pr�= 4:l.ih4> > r,a . �' � � - � GEf. 4? ; � �at a � s '1 er1r� GnecK Nurnbe.r^ 1 i _ . ' . , - 'Y�rn(�+ 77hFc}c J�+umL+er� ] � • ' ., . . �. , . ... . • . . .j 15 i3c�adyeat� 9erv2ce3 :3tc>^� 4'.>i-'i3�P-'!'��^:=� t•ires I�.?.:f,= , _ 7 t� n,_,adye�r 9P1�•V 1 CP. !3tare Q:1-•�r3J+2+-•49�r-��ri t 1 re r-pr J. �aT, � n� . ' , . ' 23�. �� . 3c.t•a1s 1'emp tiher_k Nurnber" 1S , • ' , ... . , ' . • � � . . _ . _ _ .. . . . .. . _ -- - - -... � 7em�+ �.; tc: r_ k 3vtrrnber• � ] � � • ' � . r 15 tiaoc7w3]] F>•�c;ustrtes Snc Y+i-4;?ES-i08:;-:5:� ;�iay svc �23E�.��+ , 23 ' . . � . . ..'.� „ r ' s?15. Sti� - � ,� . ` 7cta35 Tem;+ �t�pc?c ]Vumt�er 29 _ . .. _ `� 7ernp �S�ec3c ;Vumber^ . . �^A � . • . . . , . � . . . � • . . . �i ;�tt, t3avt Tra2 n2 »g Svc �21-%ttiLnQ+-•�2��-y^a.'+ >�egr i r�2 riger- , .. _ . ��. �7L.� , � � c � . . i-_'� '.- . ..- i�� _.cc�.�_ • . . ..., _ '�- :!,.c ... �1t.Y+t2 .., ., , �� 7otais Ten��+ tvheck tVumber ;�+-- .-. _ . .-_�. - _ ___ ... _ - . 7e�rrp �hecH ;V4�aDP_t' � ,;a� � � . , ' � .� t ,. - . _ . -_ r , . . r.. - . « • ,_.. , . � � c.3 ?i2 r,d 2 rrg fieat i ng II+1 -433:,-.'123-3t1 rprs . .�4�:�th.,.,h � + . �. j .�� • • . ., � , . r • . .. . - . . - -- b�r. :�td i> r ., -. Tc7ta 1 s Tem{s �hc: ck )v+�mber :�1 -- - -• -- --- - - - . _ Terap �GYiec3c Ncunber , . . . ' • ... .._ . . . . ._ • � • � �. � i . � .. . r i� . . .� . .. ��-.^_ I E �0 N R 7 �3—�i;� El�� payr^c,11+. .-:.�u �-:, _ . i 2StG,5� �. _,- �. • • s''i= S� t+3 A R 3 Ys1-413�r-•:i2¢+-1+Z+ - 6l29 p�yr�z21 e�_•r�r � �44 .'b.:s. 3:� � Tc.ta]s 3ernp �tiecH Narnbet� �� - - -- -- - - -- - TPh7�r �77P_Ck tVuraber �3 �3 Svy fiarfe 7cw»f�ause }3ssr•r �L+9•-44bY-•��L.'�-�.'��'i rprs exp reirnb �3 T«La1s 7'em{-� L`t�r�ck tvcrrnt?c:i^ r3 7ernp �;3ec?c Nurni�er :�+'s r• � - . . , � - � • . � s? Su1 :k39S� L•2aims iisz �?-.�--.? - L• .;' �age 3 r�. -_,._.i ;•�.�' , �ri ; 1: 31 Rt�f �1 ty aT' fnc->>�sc7at� 1-7a_ 1 aht s �� ' - � ' , � �'P.mp �YtPci: ;Vurnbe)^ ;=1i ' TPfr7E+. • t3!�erx i+]t17�7bP.7' VET'lfJC�J' }VEi/!!P_ FICCCrttYr4 �C�dP LCIAf/7BYr't5 F'r7fC�Ci17'C . r,1 . r ;=�r tirrc.x Lumbe�^ z�1-�+3L9:,-•Y+rttT��-Jc� n�lsc sF,.1ys 3��.9� ' � y � '� - - :i �. 9.A. 7ata]s Temp �GYieck Numbe.r •?_9 • � � . 'Yemp �t�eck Jvc�r,rref^ �.._ , �� Yncrnas Y,r•ruY.h 'QS-4i11J-G'JC�L.�-�1Z+ �r^c� mlleage Ic_i.59 •-� :�:� Ttian�as Xnuth 36-�r�iY:3-•ES43•-V.nD �+ra,� mlleag� �• 33.ci! ' ,^� 3hc�mas ftnuth aT�.:,•-<i�r1 ✓-1F:,-Y9 " nT3 sc mi 3 e.age _ . . . 1. 3fC • _ , . . - � 1:✓E. ;?6 ) Tata3s TcnJp �»<:ctt 1Vi�rnt*ei^ �� 5'emp �Yiecx Netrnber �26 . , � �, _ _� ., . � �S ?tic�de� Arch i;r^oti�� LTSS �r3-4�,?��Z-•�^•2�+-•�� Re fi�rk si�e] ter �, ;�, :�3=r. 35 , . t ;=5 •�� :�94. :38 „ i'c�t.� 3 s 7emp �hi: cH svun�r. er -�f . ` . "'t 7emp CYrec}c Nt+rnber �2i . , , , � . - �'; Li.512e Sut�urb2r� JVews 'AY-1lJ�J�'�Jl�"J� custccfian aC ��;=.�¢ `-1 �7 L22S1e 9ubcri^b�n ?vews �+1-•fr:��-•0.+7�-'1Q+ cU5todla» ad r,r.4�-�Q+,.:; ' ,., _ . i=%� i3 .l Z] P. Jttbtf}+bEtri NEWS S�-4�Qi:i-i2�StC+'-FaLh CUS�bd3 e3Yr Ad i�c. f'�t i2 f�+, __ i � . , .':i' . i � ., .. . , l '�{ . . ' . . .. . c .� '_._�_' x'� .... . . i ) �2 � . . .. _.. _- - � 66.Lr¢. ictaS 5 '7'efa{s �1�eak Ntrniber-�- i7 � - -' ' . -� -�(vit . ,. � V .l . .. .�.� . • i t?�_ .... .. c . • ; �'Prnp �riecfi� tJurnber • . �g . . . . .. ,: 't. .�-„ ��': .(. • , . . . . . � . , t� � - : r �5 T72 nncsc�ta ic..cks a+1 -44y�.'�-��L+-:-�c1 du�2 ke.ys .:,. �+5 '� �8 :.�. tb3 'iot�3s Ternp �»ecx :vumber �� 7ernp Ltieck tvurnt�er �'3 � , ) ��"3 M f-} H'SSOC•iates Q+1-43�:.:�-f[�.�-.:r� � splys . +iFa.B¢ � . � 1•t A Rssocl2tes Q�1-43t2+�,-�T+7a�+-7Y+ splys 96.8Y� �^3 tn A�sscr.latPs s.:r-43Yd:,-¢6�-�t2 sp3ys �6.5� � 57 1 %40. +4Q� 7��r.a.ts TE'!J7(_'+ L'Y7.P.CH tv+.�mY�Pr ��3 iemp�Y�ect: Nurn�er^ 3i2+ . ....,�...._... .�_ _.r -.._.......... ..._.._.�..___._ __.._._..�......,....._........---4. . _ . .._ _._�.._..._..___ -- i 3>2+ M�Y`t� 117 JtlC HS 2 2 St• P.T' $1 -++Yt}+ft-•t2�'LYZ�--i'.'>7 FE �+a7'2 6Ck ��2t2+. L'i� ��'•+ 3il.Y+. FY� Tr_•Y.�ls 7e+r�1p �»ertc Ncrntbe�^ 3L'+ .•_-�-'-- --, '-- - - --- - -- - - - - - - � � - - - - - . - - - 2:3 Jtr2 29� �ia]Ins List � . ,s'... . "-'1 - f=r2 21:�1 �M �.lty of 1rc:r,C�,t�x Meig;�ts ier,�p £:hec3r Ne�rabe>^ ira'S � � Tenr�+. L•`recf: Ncrr;l5er 'v'P_YrGC?^ :4ame F+ca��urrt� LicC,e vk3 TCfY818 "fPfi7fJ �i')eC)c :�ttl,7S7P_i' r1�2+ 4'ElrJ�7 L'}7f?Ck 1Vr,tl�1%�Pt` . !11 . • t12 fipaT Ma�^u1i ch h7a2 ri :F �r., L.'+A -4:�2�-13�2•-:lY.� +12 f>L=�f MAY`W.t Ck M�114 iF LC, ib�•-••ti'''F�F�-�1 7.+0-•.'� ✓ . +t� fiP_Eli� :�;BT'VJ1CX M7fYr :(• �O 2✓...tiL=.`:'�.'�-•1.�itZ'�•-6$+ 43 Feat ?�ar�w.tr.k J�la1» tb ��:. *2+3-•4��c'_@-•13t27-�L:'�o.� +�:t �eat i�aT'w2r_X 1�fa]n :t• �c, 9�-riti:-�+-']3Pi-��2� 41 �e,32: Jnai^w.t ck fra 1�� t4 Ca 2?:1 -•4:?'cY+-'1 3Y��•$k'+ 4z fiea� ;•l�rw]�r_x Ma9» :c� Fc 94•-4��^th.•-YsYt+-•a"�� ' 1r2 fiP�t JnarWlr.k M�1» R- �C� 16•-9�:`*+2+-•:13�h•-II�Y+ _ 3:?8 7c�t�2 s � errrp �ner_?c Nutntrer �+1 i'GA7�'1 T77BCk 7VttA7bEY` • 4',- - .. - k�? F c�b1 7 c Frnp2 Ret r7ssrr L�+2 =��i4 � 4;= Tatals 7emp Cf�eck SVc�mbe�^ 42 7'P_Aij] '�Y7ecH NetfilbE7^ � ' 93 ., � ' , • , 43 ftu�f-L'irt•L' . ."1 i?�x•-441Y+•-'g+9�-•i10 +.v�:i.iy �r� - 7ot�1s TPrn�-, i''.heck JVc�r,rL�Pi^ ri3 i e/A{l �hPc}c Nttmb�r .'� . A�4 . ,%:r 'L . 4� 3":4 S�L�Ai']ce firoduc'Ls 5+2-4�3F?�:-�cffi��'� .. ." __ i .�i ._.�. ._ " � ._ ' �Y " 1/ 1� Tc�ta t s i Pr�� necu 7vunrber 44 7cmp �heck Nccrnber rr� 4:f J i 9h�.eley �0 8+2-�44,=.=-•/Z+�Q+-:�i?+ ti J - 7ata25 7Pn1p �heck t�zrmbe�^ 93 i'ein{� �T-�er_u fve�rnz�er �9s 9E '9taY.e Treaastzrer iA1-33s:� 4$ :_lLcitP_ '3�Y`Bc'iSCtl^P7^ i �-•�33 � +t� �tatP 3'>^�as�1r^er^ �+1-38]:, 2 3�s 7ata2s TPh7jJ Check iV�tf17Y]Bl^ 4� fiBge S Comrnenz s fimc ur t ._ � . Y�4:• t+ai ar�ce audi t Tae 95.:,. �:�a'+ ; ba1 ai�ca attd: t f'ee :i 7�. 4�¢� ba] ar,cc audi L Tee 1:`�. LhLh ilcl i 811C.'P_ el ild 1't i2P. � J�J. Q� Dalanc� aud3t Pea ✓3.f+4'+ baSa»c:e azitl2t' Pee :i3.��2+ . D�lance audit�fee �15.i2+Q+ �na.2�i,ca_ �udt�t i'ee 4f]S.�Qi , . .. . ..25 c•$f1+. Q�tZ� ' Ju2 pr^em - - �r�.�'�'+�+ _ ., .. . .4:�%. Y+Q+ . : ..��evee'd c:utt3ng � r'.?;a=; .c.' r . . .... "�,i��fr Y �s�. �a t<��.. . � - � ��._ t-t�•.•? f� : , sp2 ys . . . ; :.�;..i . .. - 1 2 g. '�� .- t . �. �. � i � Z7��'J. �1� cil� Xey 34. �7 34. '✓7 ;'�ncf qtr^ slcn�s ii'iL7 Gtl^ SlC]7175 �nr� qt:^ s.'c:�sgs :?z E:��.. 6:✓ x "_ . :'�4.'+ :! b.'�;�. ✓� C7^ �-'s '�'�.''..:=, bL� _ _ _ _"__" _ ; '" ""' ' ' � . -- . , .. _ . �.z,: . 4..� 13 Jcr1 19� �3alrns L3st , ��' � , „ -. , , _ fiage 5 , _ . , _ �r�i 21::;Y AM C.Sty aT Mendota ttPights y�-� -- � • ,. � t � 7em{� 'C3�e.r_k ;dcrrnber^ 31 .- •. _ Tentp. . ' � �;� ec:e �vutaL-+er^ ver7oar^ rl�rae Hccaurrt �c�de �amraPnr,s f�mc:�u»t: ,-� :�s t�ea �e»z�r�s 3�r � �+1 -�-*i,n?H Htfg prem x s 4;,3. 5� ::c ;rcd �e.nter^s t•7 7=� �5-tr131-11z�+-•i�.n Ficr� {�r�rn 55&.6::r r..� 31 MPU i:et7tet•s N� ¢�1 -•41 31 ...�+�'ff+-•i.s¢+ Aug �*i^em 1� 934-�. �a 3Y Tted L`cnter,s N�` Q�#-Ei131-tT9�1-•tIt[ Fil7P (?rem ...- +i:�tc'r.$i2+ �1 hTetl ��enters af � � . Y�2-�42:3Y--ff+:�2+-•'�S� . . Tiug prern .. .. ,. ' 9:17.1h:� .• ,. � r.� 32 Mec; �eni:er^s ?9 f-` i'�i-�131-L�+7�Z+--7� �iug prPrn 1rQi:.E7N 3Y taed t:eriters t9 � m:,•-•4is1-••y��s-a;s rdug prern � 7i9.Ea:2+ .., 31 ?aed �entet^s t•! fi t'uu-•433;�-+2QiZ+-�2+�2s Fiug prem 1t[�r, 6¢• f� 31 taed i:enLer^s fi P 1:1•-•i231--Q+64�•-6Y+ �- Fiug p�^enl '.�_ ., 4Y�9.E�+ � ... L79 • . • ?f �i7,c.. 6✓ ^ T�.ta] s Ternp �:�eck Nurnber �i . � � 7E.�mc� �heck 1VUn7ber 32 ' ' . , . , y �: '.� . 'a . . . �-� 3-� Metrc� iAaste trc•rrtr^c1 3�'•-44ti9-F6+�-Sti'� - ' Jun sar_ engs �. . 3s ��lii�.3��2+ 3r Metr�o t�1�st.P �oi�tra2 2�s-�F�1.� � . .Tun s�c^ c»gs ____36,s�c�^ - ,. -,� c%� ' . , 3�:�64.+Tr¢� .. , Totals Tern� IIY�ecfr fVu�nber 3'� � � r., Tem� �necx h7UAtYJP_J^ 3:} , 3.s J�f2`dwest 92re�i Ser^vlce T2+?-433Y"n-�ZT2+�-r7J� `} Y.~ Ju3 rntcrr -- - - S2.ti� �7 ---- i. . . , . . , _ . , . !, . _, � . . . « . - ... : -•-•-•--• �t3 . -, � : ,. = 6�. tt7L� .,. ,.4 _ . 7ata3 s Tc>rnp �»eck YJtrmber 33 � j , .... . '� _ .'�'d: ..... i Semp �T�ec?c fVumber 3� ; ', . . . . . .. .., . .. . . _. ..� , . 1 � •", b � , , . 3� M2 12 er firj YlY. �T%Tj � � • II�J—r1.iYYL�Y�"�TZJ—� r� "" • , _ • • — SP�1 �/S •• ' � • ••• � • � %�J. �+�7 34 M2 1 1 F?r Pr2 nt 1 �ag . . - _ 1 :r43ffnZ+-Y�6¢+-EY+ . .. _ . : swr i^ece2 pt . booHs - . , :�3�T+. >h¢+ �� . „ . . ��.��.� . � r.� .L� C'1! . � - • � i9� � ,i . �. � - • ^ • � - . � . � �- . . i. i • . w .l . 1� F?��J. �� 7C�ti �i 5 '7'ern}� Z..'i7ECi1 htcrmncr .�fii � � � .� : . c � i�' 4 _. .�i i•• •• . . _ _ � . ) 7Pm�s �rtc: rx ]vcrmUc r 3:� �� 7�J2 r�n fia2 3 ce Recrui trnent 8yszem �1 -�4�tFr-•�2�=Yt-;=+2 �e flarl ock 7:1�h. 2�7. � 3:s T��.774.3 , Tota t s 7em{x �f�r�ek 1Viembe�^ 3:1 � � 7emp �C77eck Nurrtber 36 " 3F� tVar^therrr StatP fiower AI-4;=9�2-3i3-3�.'� Ju5 svc . 3Y.69 :3f TVortf�ei^» 9t,3tc: �r..wer^ Yh1--4t:1i-•31th-'.!`Q� Jul sve 3c3.76 36 Nc�r^1:hcr^» St2tP �owe�^ �1--4�1�-3S�Z+-7'� Ji�i svc 3�.T6 j 36 1vpr,tt�ern State �owet^ 1��-4��1i•-�31�.7�-bII� tul swc 3£�.7:, 3E tuc�rY•nern ��atP fic•wer �:.Y-2r•: 1� -3:�?•-iY� .Fui svr_ ir3, 5� . �• � Y� ri�i :t�� 1 Frx a ��: s� Ari 7enrc+ ��heck 1VumbPr 3� Yernp. �»ecft tJLrli7be)^ 1�e.ndcr ,Va7ne ;,3F1 i110)^CYJC:)^Y} ,''-_li:c7'iiB fiQWP_!^ 3G ;v�-�r^ther» Sta. e ficwer 3f., h'ct^ther�n 9Late �_nwer� 3E Ncrthc>i^n :7tatP 7�awer^ 3E �vartt�er^n 8i:ate= fic+wer ��. tVarthPrn State fiower 3c', Jvarttrprn �tat� �ower; 9 31� Sctals Yernp i;hPck tJurnt+Pr 7r>nip T:t�eck � Nuuit*er . 3! 37 TJartYier» 9tare f'c�wa>^ 37 war�thc:r» St.:rte Fawer 37 1Vc�i^thPrn Statp ficwer 37 P:c+t^thF�^rr niate Powf�7^ �i% NC.7`thLJ`17 SL'B'�'E �OWGY` 19� �'`�. . 7ota i s rem{+ r»c: cx ;c+.+mtr�r Temp �f�ecx 1Vzvnber 38 35 Nc.rwest SanK Mpis ` � 3£� �tvor�wPst i�anH Mpls : �_ .. 39 Ncrw�st f:a»fc t1p2s �t! ritarevest itanx toF+1s � _ : �.9 NGt'WBSY. S'2rik T'1�72 S 3Li tUo7^wL SL Et.�YiH M�72 s 38 Narwest RanX Mp1s Jtj 7Ve.rwest Etai�H T�p2 s 33 Nc�^west Pa»k Mp2s 3[! tvarwest San?t t7p1 s 3g fVar^wsst S�rnfc Mpls 3f3 Wor�b.+Pst �a»?� f+lpls '!36 Tcta25 Tenip �hecH Nurnber Tent(1 Cttc:ck factn�tre�^ 39 3� tJcrwest Aar.0 Mpls 3� 1Vorovest flank Mp2 s 35 7vcn^we=st Farrx Mp2 s 31i Tcta3s Tem{s �t�Pck tVi�mber Fernp �T�ecu Nurnbc_i� trth 4¢ Dxygen :3ervlre L•c , ., ._ . Cla.tms L15t �. . _ � • , 9 L:lty cT Mer�dc�'ta tfe2ghts F'iccc�ct»t �cde 1 �-A;� 2 i�_'41Y+�-6Yi � 5 --4'� 3 :=.-g�t2 tT-�4''� rh1 •-4'� 2 1 -••3:1 �•-3m'+ �1 -9:�3 1-31 ro:�^�iZ� 2+Y -9'c�i 1 -•32 Tl.r-:12+ 1 �"-4�21'1 -� 5 tt -f u> L�t`_�-1�c^3 1-•QrQtt�+-�2r 36 . . �1 —Eii=1 � "yi�c��Ji�} ¢�Y •-•4� t X -•4�"Q'+-:��y+ �:5-ir'�1 � -cf1Pi8-t2,2+ thx -4ti 1 1-•3�.�A-7¢i i J'_t1i 1 1 "1J�'�—sl:�� 37 3.:�-%t4�r6-it72�2-•�2:Z� - - 3`...F-4:�28-•2+u.+YL.�-�iZ+ w . _ .�..1 -fF9�F.r-7TiZl�"�+� 3 2 -•92"c6'-4R72�Qe-Q+Q+ . � s":0•'4i}.:�fi-��-•Q@ i ✓-�F 4,'°'_.Ea-�Q+41-Q+t�'+ �7Z�-4: `.?E -2+Zii! -v�ic`r 4� 1-i? 2 1 � '�9 -123Q+ 1 tt•-49�"R+QrQ+-'�+L.'+ � rF-9+4�E-2'2�¢�-�Q+ 3 4-4��6-12+¢+ft�-•Q+2> 35 2 �-4ti.:i`,-�Y2�11+-�tZ+ 1 1-•�r+r:�E�-��-4t� 14 -�1.?'.= b -t2� G.'+� -��7 33 $�] -4�3t++�-t.'. �t?+_.,iQi � �omme»ts rttl svc Jt�1 ,vc Ju2 svc • • � tt2 svc . U 1 51/C .Su] svc JLt] SVC ... stri svc • Jtt2 syc Jtrl svc Jit2 svc . Jit: svc ' .S r; . ' -tl• 3� bd5 •?----• 'r�.• .'`� tj9 bd5 ,.. • _ . . 9? b05 . + ,�� ; L;;c37 b05 �• • " 7'y UCs . , � .,-4. _ �9 bas 79 bds . bc1 pymts bd pytnts 7i= bd S 7;� bds 7•?. isd5 7� bds - - - !:� bd5 i`5 t�Qs cy1 2 r�sp ��ge T �i'170Ctri'G : rt . 'v?4� =FE�_ ?�� %�3r3. �F 1f.,.?6 . �tJ. cF� .t �w i % :�i G-'�. �'^�. 1 s 60x . 7fh F��3. t�+? � i 4m. v� 1s163.3:� � J'h. �'� 9:3s. 1 E •�s %17�. 5fa . � �- i :�iag �2.'2i'�, fc'�i2 ,. �1��. �U ✓�44.y ?jJ7Z. �+L� i: , - "r , = r ;,.• L�`1121. 1�� -• 3 z �64,. k�2• . . - , , 1, r_.23.:,m ��77Z•2. �.t2+ 3✓s LhtZ�'+. t'�Q� �Js 5��. L.'+IZ+CT' :_�'✓'� IDQYQ+. �+Qr 6�r6_ ;_"... tIIr¢f. ¢:rL+ 1 �7a t2+G9. P+1 � J. �� "J' � • 13 Stt2 Y?_�L3 � 7=r2 � �],: 31 fiJ+1 ':�LIpj9 fYJBC31 t4ttIRbP1^ 1F7 '%�EllJ{]. �.t�ecu Nt7lqb2t' VBY�tlGt' iJAIAB +i7 `3t)"P_.SCl7B)^5 97 Tr�ta.is 3em� �Ct�eck N�t�nt�er i�r�r}�. f»eck tVc+r��he�^ 4c3 � �s3 St�» �uewspa�er^s 4ti J�irr fVpwspa�+ers 9t3 FOt.a1s 7ernp �.t)eck NurntJer Temp �»ecH N+�mbet^ . 43 93 i� 9 t�+est �cnzrnu»2r_aL2c�rrs ir9 i1 ;3 L)est Lornmu�oi oat 2 o�as 4S Lt 9 bJest Licmr,2crn3 cat 1 c.r,s ti9 LJ � iaest Lc.�mrni+��2r_atlans 19E • � . . Tr.•t.a3s Semp �heck NumAe>^ � - r T�rn�+ �nr�cft JVtrt,ltrar �i°r :!a3 Urr2 fc>•ms Lfr,T 1mj tetl R� , Tc�ta2s Tem,� i:»eck TVun7ber 3��•� frdnC TCrSal . � v.. . _. . C � �la3rns L1�st . r. _��re_�'•, , v;,_�� i',1 ty aP t��e�odata t-7ei gnts Accc.+.�»Y• i:c�de Q17-'�:ti'I �7 P1 -tr•24tA-a'.�th-5�.� �:i -•9'?4t�+-�2+8Y+-•6Lh �u �,s —�•� s m—,��r-�-�2+-�� v+ , . ... 3 :.i-•+3211Z+-•k� GQ+-G�T+ �!+1 -4:�1 t7.+-�iL�-5ti'+ � 1 --9? 3 r'rr-�+?�Z+•- i � 45 YZ+1 -`t41 g+•-�2�:tA-'2� JL� N fiage 5 '� L_,. '' ... �arnrnerrts �7fi7CLtY�t . r.y . �, t SP175G1^ . ` 3'9�.:?k� � __._._.__ t� .. 399. .'.�l24 ' • v C . . , , • • � ','"' hi�r� r�ot Fi^.t �ch ;= �. E+1 .-�3 .. - hr[3 i��t �J,]c�:�cr1m 9'..s.3�� ,� . 2t8.3� � . . �'� -•r�. _ . :r .. .. � � � �u2 svc - - is1.E� . .,.Jr�2 svc _ 3E�`J'.r37 . . _� Jt�1 svc ]4_�;8 . Jtrl svc , 14.3r3 , . . . _. 1 . . . . 4:�t'+. �7 :_3 �4 �o .i.Y Y.. . ♦ . . . � � �� rni sc iiar^1 ock . 2 � � �=�4�... , , �- ,, . .. �,� • ,. . ° . ' 1 � ftr�- 9 �+ 'l: + ' ... . , e•. .1 . . , ` . �. .... i . .. F r � , � � . . .. ' . . T_'_"'_'__'_____� _ _ .. � ' 1T 184s;�7'J.�3 _� 12725 5.50 Dept Public Safety Dupl title fee 12726 758.04 Co�rica2 Asphalt rec/rock discount � 12727-73Z 150.00 SoftbaZZ Umpires 7/12 • � 9I3.54 G.T. S,I85,490.77 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO �, July 17, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admin's FROM: Klayton H. Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Completion of 19900 Rogers Road House Moving Job No. 8923 ._ DISCUSSION• - " Mr. Frank Fabio has completed the house moving and clean up procedures for 1199 Rogers Road. He is requesting that the City release the $1,000 escrow we required for this project. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends Council authorize staff to return the $1,000 escrow Mr. Fabio submitted to the City for the house removal. ACTION RE4UIRED• If Council concurs with the staff recommendation they should pass a motion authorizing staff to release the house moving escrow of $1,000 to Mr. Frank Fabio. KHE:dfw 8 �� : rh ��. � ; t �a � � � � .� � � ��s �1 ��1�� y �. .f . � �.�-�� T� � , � � p�Q � � W� � e. v h dL P v S f vl � �l Q. v- �, � V-r O l. 2 S z` ��t e. j�r d�llS ��X � � ��= u.� c� r '1.v1. � 1�1 ci, � e. r Q r c� � f e- Ul 7" Q r �� e� rf � i? � G�t'aY � r 1+a Y1 ��' Y�.. 3 � G� �. �j � p C� 0 t vi t�� j C o,S � d� Z k. e. �' r o� e. �� .. _ . t. �/() � Q v� 1 � � � t ' �p ,b � o � �j�f +' e•�, -C�w �. .A-'X 1 -�J � 1 �v1 �e „5 ,�i'�A�l ,$' .,,u , ... / {' � ,�/ j � ;11� � e�.r' �� 2!ti �. C o�� 0 6 �r.�-� i vt, lM. e. �t�,C� h, �... � � m _ i,,� h_ �... �2% e. �"' �,(,) � P r�. �i t o$ � � b t� 1'i i Vt U 7i � j t 1,, � � �IU � @ V" a � �In ,e. e O +� � � � �! Q d �'` t �Y V �'' Z� e- � ,Q..- UV �- r"' `�s� �,/ �/� �)1 � @ V �. , j � '�. W �S �, D � �-�" W �"Y' l7L V\ � W �'"� 'e- V' �CiY�,.��v1 ��.(" !l� `�� .Y a- �� t' � �,{1.,p� 7`i �.,. e.. v vti (�.. e r�' ty Y! �.GY �,�.v e- v- � a. s a 11 � J � e. � �„�� , "�� ,�' ,� z r � �a s L� 5 �...a u ��X vi, e il e.�r" �i � Y' �. GC1 c..� �e �. � �/ l_N / ��i. � ��a � �e.r �� S � G+ v � cQ Vt v � t �'t G V� e c1 f � �=��.- 'i.> .�i! � �. .� �- 1 r �'J t� ri�. til 01 S C'. S tiu r�j! C'o v�, '� + vt � e. �[� � v 5 c d� .2, S . '�... ��. Y' _q 2a. !� r�'t L v o 1 f'o t� ,P''.� �'" �- S S G�Li. � C..�O v n G!/. U � � � C. ti►" .2 S � �1.. �,°,, .5' 1 _y 'r1. �,.� � t� r �'�O �' Q � "� (n.. �,,' cl 'Ir � /•✓l �L/ V � Y' �.. � V �° .S 4 �D V` S�. t Q .,S' �,. t�f.J C V' !� 1I� K. %iJ �. Z' G V" `W �, r` e- U�k - t� e U � r e s S u�' c�,, �� r�- a, *�l 7`0 �'�,r-' �t..o u r J�-�s �/ o}� , • �� .�~ s S ��, fi; 5 r v� c� v' ,S Uv � v�. -n o�' ��j� {�r � e.� �t� � � � , l, h�l� � � , � � � �.� -� b �f� � �� w�{� �� J�� ow n e,rs, y %R �.v- e�o ,� 'w c�.0 �..vt '� c�,c c e. S,S � S � Yt a�� c.a V' �S � . fX- �, �` e o �. �� 4 � t � � --�+ri �=a,,v �. ,,� �- � �U �e v' , S G� }'t C' Y^ J" 9� �. t� S 1� �i� t� t n� kA L t3C �� 2, �ca �L°(lj v v� �, c� � l!� �: �� `��d ��-.�' e w �.. �,. r.� �...c�. ,�. rz, S e ..�.. S -�2 e vi C � � c�, v� ,� y� �, .� ' ' 1 � �- � � S..e.1,v e. � � �. � �I z.�7� e. ,r-� a� � �. w � ll rt,.o Z�' ,�''' h J..,..�,. 7� , ��' - `'�.�--� cz �... �... ,5' �1�. � �2 't� � w c. GGi ,� U x� o v� c. e_ . . � � , ,- a > ,J�/rrf �>,i1,�ii°G� � �,� �% r�-' " ;n -��l "-� '.,�ti l _.,�; ,_-� ' •' r.. . � %�.''� � 4' �.% �- ( �. �' � ' /1 �-��'��' �J-� �'./ / ` IM � � / � / �a� c�-,�-�� -� -� � ? � ., � �� . ��'''�'�� o�� `d"�:�``1 . -�.��-� '� J �i ��r j�� r � L �� ...,.�� ...� - �_ _- _.�� ? �� `---�--�- -� �� -�,�,,-�,-�, - �� '"" C�%`� ' ° �� '' �� _ s�` �� .��-� y� -{' �Y`1 �.;� -�-s' � v z � z °� � �� '� r � � �'�° �'� —� ��/ � ' �� l -2�' G� � ' 'l . ��?�� -� �� '� � �� '��1�� z_. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 16, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Richard A. Gill, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Mowing of Green Areas INTRODIICTION: I have notified many property owners of the requirements of Ordinance #1001 that weeds and grasses over 12" or gone to seed would have to be cut. Several types of property are controversial and perhaps should be exempted. DISCIISSION: As the School District #197 started to mow the area north of Mendota Heights Road and south of Apache Lane, we received several complaints stating that this wildlife habitat should remain natural. (Recall the petition by three property owners with lots abutting Huber Drive). I allowed the mowing to stop until the issue could be discussed at staff level and presented to the City Council. We will be discussing different areas that should be considered as exempt from this ordinance and will present it to Council on August 7. Several residents of Apache Lane apparently intend to attend the Council meeting of July 17th to ask that this area remain natural. I have assured Cindy Nelson that we would put the matter "on hold" until further recommendations have been given. ACTION REOIIIRED: For information only - staff recommendation will be presented at the August 7th meeting. RAG:nb MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT A/BV10 TO: Mayor, City Council and City FROM: John P. Maczk ��'�� Fire Chief SUBJECT: New Fire Personnel DISCUSSION: I .. .1,i- July 11, 1990 Over the past several months the Executive Board of the Fire Department, myself and City Administrator Lawell have been accepting applications and interviewing to fill -four vacancies in the department. These vacancies were due to the retirements of George Noack Sr. and Steve Carlson, resignation of Dan Barrett, and one position that has been vacant for quit some time. We received 7 applications for interviews and four hav� been sent for physicals. All four of the applicants have had their physicals and will be before the City Council on Tuesday, July 17th for confirmation of appointment to the Fire Department. With the hiring of these four individuals the fire department will be up to it's full authorized compliment of 36. The four applicants being presented before you have impressed those of us conducting the interviews as being excellent candidates for the department. All four have also successfully passed the physical examinations to meet the requirements of being a firefighter. The candidates and a short history of each is as follows: Mark Kaufman - Resides on Cheri Lane and works for North Star Steel Company as a mill operator and. temporary foreman. Mark works a rotating shift so he will be available various times of the day. Primary reason he would like to become member is because "he has always wanted to be a firefighter and wants to become more involved in the community". Roy Kingsley - Resides on South Lexington Avenue and works for General Sprinkler Corporation as a field foreman. Roy is responsible for the installation of fire sprinkler systems to NFPA standards. Roy will be available primarily in the evenings. Primary reason he would like to become o� �� C�vUQ...�� member is because "he has always wanted to be a firefighter". Roy is also in the Navy Reserves and has received some firefighter training in the Navy. Dave Dreelan - Resides on Swan Court and works for Monroe Systems in Mendota Heights as a sales representative. Dave would be primarily evening response but may be available daytime if a Major incident would occur. Dave's father Paul is a member and his Mother Carolyn is a member of the planning commission. Primary reason he would like to become member is because "he likes what it did for his father and would like to put something back into the community". � Walter Klarkowski - Is a new Resident of Mendota Heights and Resides on Willow Lane. Walter works for Shanno Trucking as a Dispatcher. Walter is also a veteran volunteer fire fighter having been with the Parkside Volunteer fire department in Maplewood. Walter will be available primarily in the evenings. Primary reason he would like to become member is because "he has enjoyed the Parkside department and likes being involved in the community". ��-7 y�/�'�� RECOMMENDATfON: It is my recommendation that Council confirm the appointments of Mark Kaufman, Roy Kingsley, Dave Dreelan and Walter Klarkowski to one year probationary periods effective August 1, 1990. 1 ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement my recommendation they should pass a motion confirming the appointment of Mark Kaufman, Roy Kingsley, Dave ' Dreelan and Walter Klarkowski to one year probationary periods on the Mendota Heights Fire Department effective August 1, 1990. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 12, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrato FROM: James E. Danielson, Public-Works Dire Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assi SUBJECT: Case No. 90-19: Delta Environmental Consultants CUP - Amoco Station Accessory Structure DISCIISSION The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their June meeting to consider an application from Delta Environmental Consultants to construct an accessory structure to house the equipment necessary to clean up the ground water contaminated as a result of leaking underground gas tanks. There was no public present at the meeting. � The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend granting the Conditional Use Permit subject to the following conditions: 1. That the structure meet the setback requirements. 2. That the buildings be used only for pumping for the treatment of ground water. 3. That the building be removed after the treatment is completed. ACTION REOIIIRED Conduct the public hearing. If Council desires to implement the Planning Commission's recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 90 - ,"RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AT 2030 DODD ROAD (AMOCO STATION)". NOTE: 5taff suggests that an additional condition be imposed to provide for the establishment of a quarterly sanitary sewer rate: NOTE: Delta Environmental has submitted documents on water sampling, Minnesota Storage Tank Program and Aquifer pumping that we have not included in your packets. They will be available at the meeting or on file at City Hall should you wish to reveiw them. JED/KLB:kkb ;F�- _• �i CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90 - A RESOLIITION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL IISE PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY STRIICTIIRE AT 2030 DODD ROAD (AMOCO STATION) WHEREAS, Delta Environmental Consultants has made application for an accessory structure to house the equipment necessary to clean up the ground water at 2030 Dodd Road; and WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 26, 1990 to consider the application for construction of said accessory structure; and WHEREAS, based upon the public record transcribed on June 26, 1990 the Mendota Heights Planning Commission recommended to the Mendota Heights City Council that the Conditional Use Permit be approved conditioned upon: 1. That the structure meet the setback requirements. � 2. That the buildings be used only for pumping for the treatment of ground water. 3. That the building be removed after the treatment is completed. WHEREAS, an additional condition be imposed to provide for the establishment of a quarterly sanitary sewer rate; and WHEREAB, the City Council conducted a public hearing on July 17, 1990 to consider Delta Environmental Consultant's application. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will have no adverse effect on the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the community and the surrounding land; BE IT FIIRTHER RESOLVED, that construction of said accessory structure not be adverse to the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance; BE IT FURTAER RESOLVED, that the Conditional Use Permit for an accessory structure be approved according to the plans submitted and upon the above mentioned conditions. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17th day of July , 1990. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By C�iarles E. Mertensotto, Mayor 0 ♦ �r � 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 19, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Dana.elsan, Public Works Dir Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Ass�. ��f�.� SUBJECT: Case No. 90-19: Delta Enviranmental Consultants - CUP for Accessory Structure in B-2 Zane DISCUSSION Delta Environmental Cansultants are representing the Amoca Station, 2030 Dodd Raad, in their request far an accessory structure in a B-2 Zone. The accessary structura is being proposed as part of a Minnesota Pollution Gontrol Agency (MPCA) treatmen�. syste� to clean up the si�e becau.se af gas� leakage �rom the ald undergraund storage tanks. The accessory structure would house a recavery we31 ta pump and treat graundwa�er, remave the gas and discharge �.he water a.nto the sanitary sewer. An accessory structure in a B-2 Zone requires a CUP (13.2(4)). Th� City and Amoco will need to came to an agreement on sanitary sewer charges for the wa�er this treatment system will discharge into the sanitary sewer system. ACTION RE4UIRED Conduc�. the public hearing and make recommendations to the City Council on any canditions on the requested CUP allawing an accessory structure within a B-2 Zone. JED/KLB:kkb � Y � PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION RE�UESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 26 June 1990 �� _' Delta Environmental Consultants Amoco Station 2030 Dodd Rd. CUP to permit an accessory structure other than a private garage in a B-2 district. 1. The applicant is proposing to construct a 12 foot by 14 foot accessory structure on the Amoco Station site at Dodd Road and Highway 110. The purpose of the structure is to house the equipment necessary to complete ground water and soil decontamination that resulted from a leak in an underground fuel storage tank. The tank has since been removed and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) requires the station owners to remedy the soil and ground water contamination to meet MPCA standards. The proposed structure is intended to be insulated and heated in order to allow the the clean-up pcocess, which involves pumping ground water to the surface for� treatment, to continue during the winter months. According to the applicant, this could shorten the process by up to two years. 2. This facility would qualify as a permitted accessory use in the B-2 zone under Section 13.3(2) in the current ordinance. Since the proposed accessory structure and equipment are part of a processing operation that is deemed mandatory by the MPCA, they can be considered necessary to conduct the permitted principal use, in this case, the service station. However, accessory structures other than private garages in a B-2 district require a Conditional Use Permit under Section 13.2(4). 3. In this particular instance the proposed use is an interim or short-term use whose life terminates when the remediation procedure is complete. According to the applica�t, its difficult to determi�e with any accuracy how long the soil and ground water clean up process will take since there are many unknowns involved. However, he stated that a reasonable estimate would be 3 to 5 years, assuming the structure is permitted allowing the facility to operate during the wi�ter. Recent legal precedent in Minnesota suggests that Conditional Use Permits ride with the land and cannot be set up to terminate at a given date. The concer� here is that the structure could be utilized for some other purpose, e.g., used tire storage, after the environmental remediation is completed and the applicants equipment removed. From a practical standpoint, the station operator would probably want use of the surface area for parking vehicles for repair etc. and would want the structure removed when the clean-up process is completed. We believe there is a better method by which to permit this use and control the potential for � . . Delta Environmental Consultants, Case No. 90-19 Page 2 reuse of the structure after the remediation process is completed. In 1989, State legislation was passed which established the authority for cities to permit interim uses if they meet the following four criteria: 1. The use conforms to the zoning regulations; 2. The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty; 3. Permission of the use will not impose additional costs on the public if it is necessary for the public to take the property in the future; 4. The user agrees to any conditions that the governing body deems appropriate for permission of the use. 4. With respect to criteria 2, 3, and 4 the following can be said, "The event that will terminate the use is the completion of ground water and soil remediation. Regarding criteria number three -- since the investment in the structure itself and the concrete basin is minimal this is of little concern. The fourth criteria would obviously be a condition of the approval and would be negotiated with the applicant:' 4. 'JJith respect to the first criteria we offer the following comm�:�ts: k The location of the structure as indicated on the site plan provided by the applicant is closer than the required 5 feet from the rear property line. As we scale the setback off the drawing it appears to be approximately 4 feet. We certainly see no reason why the structure can't be moved toward Dodd Road one foot to meet the setback requirement. The use requires the nearly constant pumping of water, which may result in unusual noise or vibration, is limited by the performance standards in the ordinance. The standards require that any noise produced by the use meet the minimum requirements established by the MPCA and that no vibration be perceptible beyond the property , line. Generally, these standards are more applicable in situations where the regulated use is near more sensitive land uses such as residential. The subject property is located in a business district and is isolated from the nearest commercial structure, a McDonald's restaurant, by at least 140 feet. Our final concern with respect to this use is the emission of fumes and the potential for combustion as a result of the process of removing petroleum contaminants from the ground water and soil. In our discussion with Mr. Kurt Geiser, an engineer and representative of Delta Environmental Consultants, we raised the question regarding the potential for explosion or combustion of the fumes emitted from the vent stack. He stated that the emissions are regulated by the MPCA and represent virtually no danger of explosion or combustion. 5. The process also includes discharging the treated grou�d water into the City's sanitary sewer system where it is subject to the additional treatment at the local sanitary sewage treatment plant. This issue was discussed with Mr. Gieser at the May 21st office hours and he assured the staff that the water quality of the discharge is tested and regulated by the MPCA. He was also made aware that the applicant or property owner would be responsible for paying the SAC charge for use of the Delta Environmental Co�sultants, Case No. 90-19 Page 3 City's sewer system and a method of monitoring the discharge was determined. Mr. Danielson can probably offer more detail regarding this matter. 6. Clearly the remediatio� of ground water and soil contamination is in the best interest of the City and its residents. It is also clear that any reasonable accommodations that can be offered to facilitate the earliest possible completion of this process should be permitted. While the Co�ditional Use Permit process could be used to permit the accessory structure, we believe the interim use statute offers the City a better alternative for the reasons discussed above and should be examined and implemented if possible. We recommend the City's Attorney be consulted as to his opinian regarding this matter. r �-� ',� v%►-.1�: .�' � � \ `�f� � ' • i �, �� ....... '�;� ;::� .. , r• =� =� •�. __ � `. �-a ( '� . 9 �t �'► �'� � � — - � :: � s < • ` ==� .� . ' i. . i. L ��,.� ..: �.} �., r . i. . . . . � �t ��` �:.;:'. .9 � . i i � � . , -=- ' - - ' � "� 4 _ _ , � << - i � �.- �� .�, � ' , t- . _ _ ,. \ . � � � - - � : ��+' ,• ,'. � r+ v ' . '_._ F- •"/ t ' t•� •, 'J. ' .. • ic * * . p ,/' "4 � � 1 • Q v • ', i i � R • � ) � S- � � •�,..�,�-.-- �y.. `,�,_ •.� . / 1 ( �! • v + �v � i � -.- '—... . .,x ~ 1 •- � _ . �x,� • � 1 _" ' �• ¢ s i/ KN � • � • * �Y • f�� • • � �yyt •'. � � •� _ ' + I Iy f / • _ � % r' • � + _ • • ' •.. . � . � •:S � � / ,..y � .. t��/ � � % . l, _ • �'�,. ..._�d . . �•� I �,\ , aENooTa �sE�cH7s . ..�`j � *T �,�j PAR 7 GOI.F COURSE y(' j " a �� `� � T `A` •��.�1 1 —� {ouBUC� � �a 1 " • / ' _ • � i� 1 � � �� a5' ' • ' ;�� Y �•' , f. '- � '' � � � � 111 I '_' -4-� �.�._—,-_..__ f� ;: . < Q a - 1 f '��{ -9 �,', . "p .! . � � f,, .3 • �-- �' x' ( //_ ! .',• " i � j"'� ' ,, '� i� `� 7I3 1`•�- � •. w�e �. Z,s_ . . � � � ; ••.,J 4s • • i,, , � , i ; + - . i . t • , • • f � • ^ / � .1 � j"' • • • T- • • _ �i ,,. _. . ,-- ,' R��t. � , i ( f , �,r �'-, i : �'� _ MARIE � I '^ I ., � '�c g �.-; �l }_---�s� � � :__. _.. .___ _.._ AV N E i � - ; , `1 . � - c'�#— � ^ � � �.---• � , . : . �� • \ .,I _. • P� F----- />! ..�-�-�� f�' I ��• �4a w N � �' _w�t.�f7� r Y� +t r" . ` � .,',l., .; ,1f�" __ ._ �'`n � i � %', * \ . , . , � i ; i ? f�^� �hvF'y•t�NCI! _ • /"' w y 1 � .� _ - - - ! A NV 7 � • 4_ • ' ,� `°� �2" � } f • / • � �_.. a � j � ' —..---- ' I • w zu , _ � _• 1 .�� -'�' �•� ��. '1 � �/ �- 6u i _ ._ . � : � '�'M� L - � ! , . . • . � . i �� _ �'� � � . �'• ' .O ' _ � 2)U r `.,,� ` • j . _- . . _ :_ j;u r n l �. • ( • T_ ' . , ' � T � f ��f i � , t _.... _._. 1 \ / rncc� ` � • f ;l ,,, Z 2 Q • f j ; '1 :l • �, , � • , E .� �. '�_-c"� -�\ � � � { - � • �^/�/{ � �� / 1-�. - • w • • •_ �.,,,rY * ` COUNf ' / f J` ,� � • � • �1 SU �u ^{(� •� -�' � S]U � I _ � • ' S • • • • . t, • O � • • ' ' � t• W • � ` � .f `• uc ure wC : .� i� � � .� �..� +�S - 4 ti , , �� ` � • • � ��j / ' �_ '..� ". ' . , . + � �. – ,� u . Y� �� • . • � ��i `�� . � f � • `-� . • �. � � � ' • , �,: _ , • �� ,,� , � �,, , : , • . • `,,,w, :_ ,� • � ' � � :-,. 'x - ---��1�— � ..��_�..1.� , ' ��• •� '; :\ f' "' ~ 1 ,� :+ , F . � � , u�„� • , _ • r / _cr+rn.h c � � � ( \ . t _�,,., ' . • � 'z'' `�� ♦ {'�� y+ • . . ... . . . � 1 -' .%, � t }i. . -- i n s o � �- ' � • ' - . �. >�<ii'.z' f �`�i r':' ..... - F . .,T,..�.�... i... �:.. ,. ��" i i � — _ � " {/ O ♦ � � a 1 . . . - r � , .. . �s:.., .; � � � . --�J,� /- - tl _...� `'- � - 1 f - - -- — J`-' _r _ .,_. � : `�I . � . i .) � � � .. � - __ +_ __._ .' ._.�.. . . ...-... ... . • ' .C..._ :... -� �,_�-•-----s _ - _ . - r-^.-.—• ---� -. "`+•_ ,y .�..__ _ _ �� _� ..�----"'L`_ �..._ �3 �`""` �''�-.___.��.' '"' __ -• - .e.-�,,,�_`_ _ �_._ . �---..� - ��,_ - fj-�S T A E Fi i G W i� Y ni 1/f ' .� �-'•`�.._.. ----- . l" '� , � � - - -- � ",;;; � i .�°' j;i: j� � e ; •,. ', N �, � �� ! . � � • ' � ; • .�v� ,: :.. •^: � ; ; J ! i�i%: ; � ! r, � "' i 1 �1- �ll � " MENOAKQTA GOLF GOURSE 9 COUN7RY C4U8 l�f 1 `a t � ( PRIVATE) � '� '�1 � s � � SUBJECT PRUPERTY 'r i �— ,� � ; ;;' ; --- ' f - _- �� NORTH T � � - _ ;, ---.,' �__ SCALE 1u=80Q' • i� _.._: = N ; ,, r ,-.: x>. � ..�. _ _ �+ - ... �� T� � � � �~ 1 ~' � 1 (\'� [� � - � j '/C�,�/{1 � � 1 � • �� .Y''�:,'r�.sd: !-.1� p\ � \ �_. � _ ; ^ 1 �'�...`.. _ , 1` ! j i1M{ wwtt .l � J- �:'.�'� : . + �� \ ~ �. ._.. � ^ ` � �',y�� j •I �, , �. \ � _'� - - - i� "� �+M( �"�o �� I'�"�� `� �v1 " � � `� � \ \ . i � - ` ; "' f} ._ /'-- , . �p •, .� �.�f , \ •. - _ ' - 1 i . ; � j� , . _� _ _ - l, ��`� . f� �' � ."'7�i •f/•y;`w '� �� i � '..� ' ; , .,1 ti � ,�� i� � ' '�, •'1'�• � '� _ � �r � _ _ - � =1' `'��=�1 's r } � I+ ,"s� r 4, . i �� _ -__ .o+��,«cA'w � Q � �� { 1, j � - � ..�_�..� ST�tES n0 EN. � � . � y' n '^.;_-^ cUll.S��nw � ��' � • V � `� .�-.._._�,....o... � �t� E ns7Ntn£K+� t�S :U�j'�n �U - �- -_ �_ � :�..------ � - (� ��• - ,, -- - .. __-___ , _: �-�-fi--�� -_ - - . _� - ---�- - �,----�. _ � -�-: �•i- � i y l�- - . -- ^' ��`- i 5... . ._.. .� - p -/' � � � •f,Kil�NCkY .Y.A�SH }-... ZaL � 'v1 w ,?� f � � :'l � . �. 1. . j - 'f• ' �\ ,:,i �tl _ � I"Q'> ' ri I .. _ + � `�. �1r� . ' ' Ir ' , ,� ' . PARK `l. ! .^..t � , w ..-' r-•- ,� , . wt.-��, � _�� , y . � �� D --• � 3 ( ' J > � yo 0 l.. �i C 8 O s ;l, �'�t s sr 4yc � v �v N� z Z , v o° s's ti . � QA M . Z � .� T � z � ni ` �'� Kt ° � ,� o � ' y L3 � 2� - ' o ' za8 3 "' ° .2 ,9 . ;�' 1� zj � Z 1 � � � '' y . h �} a `�, z� p � ,° �� ?! 5 �w � G. 4. N '� n w{ �` 4. 1 ,�'A yy � f 3S Z � � ��^ \ Z 2 �G o �. Oy o' `° m ��Y. \ 1 :H•� E O 9 I� 1 D� E P L A G E' O ry� `?'° J'- � \'�,`\ � O � 33�2 b � � TG /J" -• .�\ �� O d SSS ya'"� . � �7; , >�ro ! O +� o.r•• �os"xV I y �i/ y � t S *? -° : 3 +a' � : p v� ' ^x Z� � „�� 79 � "� 150 IlY JL K ' R/ y �a •{}� p f E's�w 2.1`}.C�L � ` � a y z, a / zo i L 2 . Qi "' � o � 2.� �� t1'�'�'�iMt `�_T'T it-*r — � ` — ! 93 ,Z � ^.� ta o' y� � v' / N� ;� - FQEEYVAY B�d 3 ,9; ma Fesc%� 3 ¢ �C 2Co•�44-$ � r .�,� ! J - a �o i 89_s: so" r. -.'- - - - - - - - �� ` .._ ~— ____. � - 228.8I � 9 89°44�25��E �3 � � ! �q'i o'�� S', 1 . �bo � � �" s� SUBJECT PROPERTY ; � :�.;x:.-°.o � . - � i .: :.:::.. ' ..::. S`w ( ,� � ��'�� '''�,,� � $9Q NORTH � ,� ' � ��::;:::;�:::.4� "� S�CALE 1"-2fJ0' ' � �::`:_��..:::...,;, 4 „ ,' .��:�_� ,� - S.�4a4 ,.. r �� I ; � �� "e N I � , .� h� a m Y P � h� � � n,�v°� ' � 2 � 3 f � � � M � N �. f?� � � r y� �� , . � � ' ' r = s� � � ti: 0 N M�N , C ity o� � .�..1. • 1Viendota Heiglits APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. Q O "' �� Date of Application - - Fee Paid _(D-r1-A 0 5�� .CaC � oi� �' ApplicantName: Delta Environmental Consultants PH: 636-2427 (I.ast) (First) (Nin Address: 1801 Highway 8, Suite 114, St. Paul, P�I 551],2 (Number & Street) (City) (State) �'Zip) OwnerName: �oco Station #5317 (Last) Address: 2030 Dodd Road (F'�'s�) (� Mendota Heights 55120 (Number & Street) (City) ; (State) (Zip) Street Location of Pro m estion: Northern edge of the Amoco site at Dodd Road PeriY Qu and Highway 110 Legal Description of Property: T�e of Request: Rezoning X� Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Plan Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number �#O1 Present Zoning of Property ,:. Present Use _ Proposed Zoning of Property ; Proposed Use e Variance Subdivision Approval Wedands Permit Other (attach explanation) Section I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. Paula M. Berger/s/ (Signature of Applicant) �.Yr �/ �� (Date) (Received by - Title) 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1VIN • 55118 452 • 1850 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING June 28, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights will meet at 8:00 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, July 17, 1990, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc. for a conditional use permit to construct an accessory structure to house a ground water treatment facility as well as soil vent extraction equipment along the northern edge of the Amoco site at Dodd Road and Highway 110 on the following described property: That part of the SW 1/4 of Section 25, �'ownship 28, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at the NW corner of said SW 1/4; thence North 67.5 feet to the centerline of S.T.H 100; thence easterly along said centerline 444.3 feet to its intersection with the centerline of S.T.H. #49 as established prior to September 5, 1956; thence Southwesterly along the centerline of said S.T.H. #49, 275.0 feet for point of beginning; thence Southeasterly at an angle of 90 degrees 143.0 feet; thence Southwesterly at an angle of 90 degrees 00' 117 feet; thence northwesterly 149.29 feet to a point on the centerline of S.T.H. #49, said point being 159.90 feet southwesterly from the point of beginning; thence northeasterly on the centerline of said S.T.H. #49 to point of beginning. More particularly, this property is the Amoco Station #5317 located at 2030 Dodd Road. This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed conditional use permit will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING June 6, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Mendota Heights will meet at 8:00 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, June 26, 1990, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc. for a conditional use permit to construct an accessory structure to house a ground water treatment facility as well as soil vent extraction equipment along the northern edge of the Amoco site at Dodd Road and Highway 110 on the following described property: That part of the SW 1/4 of Section 25, Township 28, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at the NW corner of said SW 1/4; thence North 67.5 feet to the centerline of S.T.H 100; thence easterly along said centerline 444.3 feet to its intersection with the centerline of S.T.H. #49 as established prior to September 5, 1956; thence Southwesterly along the centerline of said S.T.H. #49, 275.0 feet for point of beginning; thence Southeasterly at an angle of 90 degrees 143.0 feet; thence Southwesterly at an angle of 90 degrees 00' 117 feet; thence northwesterly 149.29 feet to a point on the centerline of S.T.H. #49, said point being 159.90 feet southwesterly from the point of beginning; thence northeasterly on the centerline of said S. T. H. #49 to point of beginning. More particularly, this property is the Amoco Station #5317 located at 2030 Dodd Road. This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed conditional use permit will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk C ity o�- = � - .�,, 1� 1Viendota� �eigl�ts June 22, 1990 Ms. Paula Berger Delta Environmental Consultants 1801 Highway 8, Suite 114 St. Paul, MN 55112 Dear Ms. Berger: Your application for a �V P�or t�-�e.-SS �c-� �� will be considered by•the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, `�v►�- Z� . - The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Ha1Z in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative -should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, � Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452.• 1850 0 0 �, . . ��III'y��m `�E ; �tFt4C■■■V1'S��ATE OF INSURANCE �SSUE DATE (MM/DD/YY) . , .. �.� i��ii L/ G V.;.,: � a,...s.»: ......n � ' � '" V' "! ' 7 V PRODUGER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMA710N ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPdN THE CERTIFICATE H4LDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DQES NOT AMEND, I�� x�� ,�,' �� C i EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDEO 8Y 7HE POLICIES BELOW f 1495 VIF:Ti�G DF�IUCp ��1�Q �p�pAN1ES AFFQRDING CQVERAGE EpE�! f'F�AI�,IEr hiN JJ�� COMPANY CODE SUB.CODE IETTER A �a�.I.I��E�•T��iL IIl�S GC} INSUREO COMPANY B LETTEft �-I��"i��'ti�} �I�� COpM'PANY G. �}��i ��'ti��'��I�i�f�� i�i.��i��'J ��[sER �IQO LQ�G L..Fifi� �1QAD 9 �UxT� �O� COMPANY S T �� A I.J L P �'S �,�.7 .�.! �. �. s�.. LETTER � - COMPANY E LETTER cQ��c��rri� �cis cQ LVYLISXUC.� :i.y-; - • . _.. ^A,..w . , . ..... . . , ^ . . , w , , • ' THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POUCIES OF INSURANCE U5TED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIQP INDlGA7ED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CQNDITlON OF ANY CdNTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WlTH RESPECT TO WNICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE tSSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, iHE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY TNE POUGtEB DESGRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO AI.I iSiE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIQNS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMI7S SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REOUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. Ca TYPE OF INSUF{ANCE FOLICY NUMSER FCiL]CY EFFECTtVE POLlCY FJCPIRA7iON ALE LIMITS IN TH011SANOS _TR DATE {MMJdDtYY} DA7E {ASMIDD/YYj � GENERAL LIABIUTY GENERAL AGGREGATE $ L(� (� 1� , � COMMERCIAL GENERAL �IABILITY � �y �_ � � � � �' & � • � L J � f � t�1 � � � � t/ C�Y � FRODUCTS•C4MFIOPS ACsGREQATE $ � � � � , , CLAIMS MApE X: OCCUR. PERSONAL & ADVERTISING INJURY $� p p�y y OWN£R'3 & CONTRACTOp'S PROT. EACN QGCURRENCE $ �TOMOBILE UABILITY � ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS x MCRED AUTOS � NON•OWNED AUTOS GARAGE lIABlL}TY EXCESS UA9l�ITY � K QTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKER'S COMPENSATIpN AND EMPLOYERS' �IABILITY ��.u�r�zw��7�. ��..:��''G�Y�Q15%t�a' � (} {} (} FIRE DAMAGE (Any ane fire) $ J� � MEDICAL EXPENSE (Any one person) $ � COMBINED , 9 I 1 S% I 4 O ° I�. O I'�l 1 UM TLE $ �. {} O O BODILY INJURY $ (Per person) HODEIY INJURY $ (Per accident) PROPERTY S DAMAGE �.�.��.is� �.�1 il�4 OTHER F�fiCIJECT 10-88-33Q�. {}2 At"SOCO �,.�'r317 i�iEi�[?QTA HE�GNT� r Mh! $ $ $ EACH QGCURRENCE � � 30Gp STATUTORY AGGREGATE 3pG4 (EACH ACCIDEN'n {DISEASE—PO�tGY IIMIT} (DISEASE—EACH EMPl.QI • DESCRIPTION OF ppERATIONS/LOCA710NS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS t�GGFiEGATE LIi�#ITS i�{�Y �C Fi��lJCEI) C�� ACTUt�L C1..�3II�i� F`{��I'ir TF A�Y► , C`�iCLU��Q�lS C�,�"..�33-TE�TI�lG OFi COi+l..�`iUL7��lG �� OrCG211b DE�IG��ITEC} F'Fiq� SEfiV . ,7 .? _ , t • CERTIFICATE HOLDER ; � CANCELLATION . SH4UlD ANY dF TNE AB4VE DESCRIBED FOLIGIES SE CANCEI.�ED BEFQRE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO C H t� I f� M A�! D F r�' L�1 �� I7`i G C CI �''1 �`S I�a S T O!''� Iv1All. 1�DAYS WRlTTEN NQTtCE TO TNE CERTlFtCATE HOLDER NAMEQ TO THE � x � Y � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � LEF7, BUT FAILilRE TO MAIL SUCN NOTtCE SHAII IMR4 Q OBLIGATION OR �. �. Q�. V I C T O F; T Fa G U r: V C LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPAN S A OR EPRESENTATIVES. � � �� `� `� ',' 1 � AU7HOR12ED flEPRESENTASIVE r�x�i�r��;c� � �acw�� /�c r'� 2s-s �aissy °� f � > . 1988 f � � 4 C ity o� .,.. �, • 1Viendota Heights July 13, 1990 Mr. Craig Anderson Delta Environmental Consultants 1801 Highway 8, Suite 114 - St. Paul, MN 55112 . Dear Mr. Anderson: � �,h�� f �o�.� � _ v� t'��,� � �- _ Your application for a -� �-- �G�SSa �y (5 �� • will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled • � meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, �� w ('] , t�� p The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive � Council consideration. The Planning Canunission recommended c�,(�rz�v41 �,,� cfil�. 'CL-e l� o w� v�.� Co�,� �'� ca nS � �'�ra.�- -N,..� c-Fr' � c. E-�, rc w-eA.t- ,c� c. �� 52'�'��' � 1 Y1t�.T ''�'�� Q u• � W Ct✓� S �A2 �!'S�CLy a►�1 �•� � r l V`C S�'f�� , fe� u c—� 6Si oT • (�%O llnsl �'i rd�Kd2.wwsC�<' L -'J 'f'�-'1' � YJuI �O�lv�Rs � ('2Y►-�Ou�.c� G�� i'C��W'eS�l/� � If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, �',�.�,,� �3�-�,�...�.�- _ Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 June 5, 1990 Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc. 1801 Highway 8, Suite 114 St. Paul, MN 55112 612/636-2427 FAX:612/636-8552 City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria G�rve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Subject Amoco Station #5317 Mendota Heights, Minnesota Delta No. 10-88-330 Dear Sirs: Amoco Carporation has retained Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc. (Delta), as their consultant to perform environmental investigation and remediation activities at the Mendota Heights Amoco stadon located at 2030 Dodd Road, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. These activities are being conducted in response to a release &om an underground storage tank on site. The underground storage tank has since been removed and replaced; however, petroleum contamination of soil and ground water remains at the site. A site"map showing the locations of monitoring wells used for imrestigation/monitoring purposes is included as Attachment A. Amaco is required to remediate contamination at the site by, and to the satisfaction of, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). A remedial investigation documenting the extent and nature of soil and ground water contamination, the nature of subsurface materials, and general properties of the affected aquifer are documented in a Remedial Investigation Report on file with the MPCA Soil and ground water remediation will take place through pumping of a recovery well to remove contaminated ground water and the aeradon of soil through soil vents. Once removed, contaminated ground water must be treated before disposal to a local sanitary sewer. Ground water treatment takes place through gravity separation to remove any free product and aeration to reduce the concentration of dissolved contaminants. A swcture to house the treatment facility, as well as the soil vent vapor extraction equipment, must be constructed. The proposed location of this faciliry is shown in Attachment B. The plans and specifications are included as Attachment G The proposed building will be equipped with an explosion proof heater for winter use. All treatment equipment, light fixtures, and any other materials stored in the building will meet applicable codes. The proposed building locarion was chosen for its proximity to the recovery well and so as to cause minimal disiurbance in trenching lines leading into and out from We treatment system The duration of time that the building will he used cannot he stated at this time; however, it is anticipated that the system will be in operation for three to five years. Practical Solutions to Environmental Concems City of Mendota Heights Delta No. 10-88-330 Page 2 June 5, 1990 As requested, enclosed is an abstract certificate listing all property owners within 350 feet of the Amoco property lines (Attachment D). Also included is a check for $350. Any further questions regarding the use or construction of this structure should be addressed to Craig Anderson or me at (612) 636-2427. Sincerely, D ONMENT CONSULTANTS, ING � �� Paula M. Berger Hydrogeologist/Project Manager ' I: .�� Attachments cc: Mr. Kirk Steinle - Amoco Oil Company DELTA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. TREATMENT BUILDING OUTLINE SPECIFICATIONS 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS a. These specifications are intended to supplement the working drawings, which together shall be used for performing the work. b. Where the specifications disagree with the drawings, the drawings shall supersede. c. Dimensions on the drawings shall be followed in lieu of scale measurements. d. All building and sanitary laws, rules and regulations having jurisdiction over this project, shall be a part of the spec�cations and shall be complied with by the owner and the contractor whether herein specified or not. e. All work, material, and equipment incorporated in the project including plumbing, heating and electrical work shall be guaranteed by the contractor for a period of one year after acceptance by the owner. Qualified local representatives shall be consulted regarding the mechanical work for adequate design for regional equipments and systems. f. Neither the firm providing these plans and specifications nor the architect shall be liable for construction costs, availability of materials and equipment specified, and/or compliance with the governing laws and ordinance. g. Furnish all labor, equipment, material, appliances and supervision to complete the project as specified herein, shown on the drawings, and/or reasonably inferred from either. 2. EXCAVAITON, GRADING AND FILL a. Provide all excavation necessary to install foundations, footings, pits, driveways, and all other excavation work as required by the drawings. b. Concrete foundations and footings shall rest on approved solid undisturbed soil. c. Furnish and place all fill required to bring the subgrade to the proper level. 3. CONCRETE WORK a. Work includes all plain and reinforced concrete for footings, foundations, slabs, pits, piers, and all other items as required by the drawings or job conditions. Concrete forms shall be steel or wood and shall be properly prepared. b. Concrete shall be of such consistency and composition that it can be worked readily into all comers without voids. c. Install anchor bolts as called for in the drawings and as required, 12" long, 5/8" diameter, 32" on center, 8" into concrete. d. Wire mesh shall be lapped one box on all joints. e. Concrete slab shall be 4" thick, with 6" x 6", 10/10 wire mesh, poured over 4" gravel bed, and shall be given a smooth trowel finish. Mixture shall be 2500 psi min. at 28 days. Soil to be of approved compaction. f. Spill containment berm shall be 10" high x 4" wide continuous along the perimeter of the concrete slab. 4. ROOFING, SHEET METAL AND INSULATION a. Provide lI2" plywood roof sheathing with exterior type glue, unless shown othenvise on the drawings. b. Furnish and install 15 lb. min. asphalt impregnated felt. c. Fumish and install asphalt shingles, 235 Ib. min, 5" to the weather. d. Provide aluminum continuous eave and ridge vent. e. Unless indicated otherwise on the plans, fiberglass insulation shall be kraft-faced, with the facing towards the building as follows: 3 1/Z" thick at walls, 6" thick at roofs and ceilings. f. Insulation shall conform to the required "R" value where required by local code. Provide insulation around ducting and pipes as required. 6. ROUGH CARPENTRY AND LUMBER ' a. Work includes, but not limited to: 1. All structural lumber, such as beams, girders, joists, rafters, headers, sills, trimmers and collars. Lumber shall be No. 1 construction grade Hem-Fir (fb-1200 psi) unless specified otherwise on the drawings. 2. All wall studs shall be No. 2 common, 2" x 4", 16" O.C. 3. Roof trusses to be 4/12 pitch, 24" O.C. 4. All other items as indicated on the drawings. b. Lumber shall be air or kiln dried, free from excess sap, large shakes, large or lose knots. c. Joists and beams shall bear on a minimum of 3 1/Z" base. Bottom plate to be treated 2" x 4" with sill seal. d. In bearing walls, headers shall rest on double stud, each side. 7. FINISHED CARPENTRY, �woRx, arm war.L FnvisH a. Work includes, but not limited to: 1. Doors, complete, as specified in the working drawings or approved equal as selected by the owner. As a minimum install steel insulated double doors in location shown on drawings. Finished door openings must measure at least 6-0" x 6-8". Doors are to open outward. Install non-lockable handle on door. Install hasp type locking device on doors. 2. Weatherstripping and caulking - around aU exterior doors and windows. 3. Vinyl siding or shingles as shown. Wood fascias and sofits as specified. b. All exterior millwork shall receive a prime coat of paint or stain before installation. c. Insulation shall be covered on interior with 6 mil PE. Walls and ceiling shall be constructed to 1 hour iue rated standard. Attachments Drawing A 1 Treatment System Enclosure Drawing A 2 Recovery System Building Construction Details : � To: From: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 13, 1990 Mayor, City Council and City Administrator James Danielson, Public Works Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assista t�(� Subject: Case No. 90-20: DI3CIISSION Sjoholm --CUP for Fence Mr. and Ms. Jack Sjoholm appeared before the City Council at their July 10, 1990 meeting to request a CUP for a Fence along their north property line abutting Wentworth Avenue. Council did not grant approval and suggested changes that the Sjoholm's could make in order to have a more amenable plan. Staff inet with the Sjoholms this week to discuss revisions in their fence plan. The Sjoholms have submitted a compromise plan that includes significant changes in the design of the fence. (See attached copies of the revised plan and an additional letter of statement submitted by the Sjoholms.) , 1. 2. 3. The revised plan shows: The fence moved back to a distance of fifty two feet (52' ) from the centerline. The length of the fence has been reduced to one hundred fifteen feet (115') from one hundred seventy five feet (175'). Additional landscaping has been added with the inclusion of three Black Hills Spruce trees for better screening. In addition, the Sjoholm's statement indicates they are willing to treat (stain or scallop) the fence in a manner that Council desires and to leave in place existing vines and natural growth to help screen the fence. ACTION REOUIRED Meet with the Sjoholms. If the Council desires to accept the compromise plan submitted, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 90- ,"A RESOLIITION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FENCE". µ � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FENCE WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Jack Sjoholm have made application for a Conditional Use Permit to allota for construction of a fence at 1161 Delaware Avenue along their north property line adjacent to Wentworth Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 26, 1990 to consider the application for construction of said fence; and WHEREAS, based upon the public record transcribed on June 26, 1990 the Mendota Heights Planning Commission recommended to the Mendota Heights City Council that the Conditional Use Permit to allow for construction of said fence be approved conditioned upon: 1. That the fence be within the pine trees. 2. That the approval be for the penciled line on the site plan at a range of forty-three feet (43') to forty-eight feet (48') from the centerline of Wentworth Avenue. WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on July 10, 1990 to consider the Sjoholm's application to build a fence and requested revisions to the plan; and WHEREAS, the Sj oholm' s have submitted a revised plan date July 13, 1990 incorporating suggested revisions. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will have no adverse effect on the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the community and surrounding land; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that construction of said fence would not be adverse to the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance� BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the fence will be within the pine trees and not less than fifty-two feet (52' ) from the centerline of Wentworth Avenue and will be built in a manner consistent with the said revised plans date July 13, 1990 at one hundred fifteen feet (115') in length and including the proposed landscaping. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this tenth day of July, 1990. CiTY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk a July 11, 1990 T0: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Jack and Gretchen Sjoholm RE: Conditional Use Permit to build-a privacy barrier Enclosed you will find plans for a privacy barrier along the north side of our property, paralleling Wentworth Avenue. This barrier represents a compromise from a fence which we � previously proposed. In presenting this plan we believe we have made a good faith attempt to address the concerns expressed by the Council on July 10, 1990. � The proposed privacy barrier is placed 52�feet from the center- line of Wentworth Avenue. The existence of three Iarge trees prevents the barrier from being placed further south on our property. The placement of the barrier will provide a green space of 32�feet between the outside edge of the ditch and the barrier. Within this area, as indicated by green circles on the plan, are 10-11 existing trees. In order to ma�e the barrier less vi�sible and to ensure the green "wall" effect, we propose planting three Black Hills Spruce as indicated by the pink circles on the plan. Instead of extending the barrier for the entire length of our back yard, we are willing to limit its length to 115 feet. In addition, we will allow vines to grow on the barrier and will stain it rather that waiting for it to weather on its own, if the Council so desires. �- This barrier is essential to our family's comfort, not onlyin our yard, but also inside our house. The characteristics of Wentworth Avenue adjacent to our property are important"to note. The uphill grade causes automobile lights to shine into our yard at night. This is exacerbated by the fact that for 75 feet or so, the roadbed is 30 inches above the grade level of our yard. Not only do lights shine into our house, but also vehicles appear to be closer than they actually are. Our children, upon hearing that our proposal for a barrier might be denied were visibly upset. They state that i£ feels as if cars. are right in the yard, and that they experience car lights shining into their rooms each�night as they are going to sleep. We cannot deny that we live adjacent to a roadway, but with the combination of the proposed barrier and planting materials, we hope to minimize the road's impact. � � page 2 We appreciate the need to carefully consider each proposal. We believe that our proposed barrier is unique, and that few others have circumstances which parallel ours: -the proposed barrier does riot enclose our entire yard, or even one complete side of the yard -the barrier is placed 52� feet from the centerline of the road, allowing a green space of 32 feet between itself and the edge of the ditch -the green space contains 10 existing trees and 3 proposed trees which will shield the barrier from the roadway -the topography of our property, coupled with the grade of Wentworth Avenue and the level of the roadbed necessitate the use of a barrier to prevent car lights from shining into our bedroom windows. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. We hope the Council will see fit to vote favorably and grant our request. :;. r� To: From: Subject: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 13, �1990 Mayor, City Council and City Admi James Danielson, Public Works Dir�ct Kevin Batchelder, Administrative As ' tant �� Case No. 90-21: Batesville Casket Company Variance and Lot Split niscussiox At the July 10, 1990 City Council meeting, the Council continued the discussion of the Batesville Planning Case No. 90-21 until their July 17, 1990 meeting to give the applicant a chance to address some of Council's concerns regarding their plan. Staff inet with Batesville's representatives this week and they have submitted some revised plans that have been included in your packet. The plans were submitted late Friday afternoon and staff has not had an opportunity to review the plans for comments in your packet. Pursuant to Council direction, Ba�esville will present their revisions at the Council meeting on Tuesday evening. A copy of the plans have been forwarded to Planner Malloy and there will be a Planner's Report available Tuesday evening. ACTION REQIIIRED Meet with the applicants and review revised plans. A resolution was prepared for adoption at the July 10, 1990 meeting. If Council desires, they should direct staff to revise the resolution in a manner consistent with any Council decision. � o� _ r�� ^"`S� � r.,�.,.,..�� .� � -�.� � ,�y� ,,..�- � �,�.•—e C�..,..�.a .]G �.,�,i�'�•�•�- � `� �;,� • ��- -.�`,�- � "fi � � � � � � �� . CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 5, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Public-Works Dire Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Ass' nt �!� SUBJECT: Case No. 90-21: Batesville Casket Company Variance and Lot Split niscvsszoN Batesville Casket Company, represented by Thomas Owens, Attorney, and Bruce Jones, Architect, are requesting a lot split and two side yard variances in order to construct an office/warehouse on Northland Drive at Highway 55 (see attached staff inemos and plans). In addition to the planning considerations, City Council will also need to take action on authorizing staff to grant the building permit. There was much discussion at the Planning Commission meeting about the building being too large for the site. The Commission also had a concern about the parking along the shared entrance drive. The applicant has submitted revised plans that now show an expanded truck turnaround on Lot 3, a revised grading plan showing berms along Highway 55 and I-494, more landscaping, interior roof drains and improved building elevations. The plan shows a thirty foot (30') driveway on Northland Drive which is five feet (5') larger than City policies allow for curb cuts. The developer feels they need the full thirty foot (30') opening. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended 4-2 (Krebsbach and Morson opposed) that the City Council grant the lot split. Commissioner Krebsbach and Morson opposed because they felt the building was too big for the lot. The Planning Commission voted 4-2 (Krebsbach and Morson opposed) to recommend that the City Council grant a side yard setback variance to allow a shared driveway for Lots 3 and 4 and twenty foot (20') side yard setback variance to allow a future building expansion along T.H. 55. The Planning Commission, as part of their motion, suggested that Council should look at shifting the building to reduce the need for a variance. ACTION REQIIIRED If City Council desires to implement the Planning Commission's recommendations, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 90- ,"A RESOLIITION APPROVING A LOT DIVISION AND SETBACR VARIANCES FOR BATESVILLE CASKET COMPANY". •- Upon adoption of the Resolution; City Council should conduct a building plan review and authorize staff to issue a building permit. JED/KLB:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 20, 1990 TO: Planning Commission .. FROM: James E. Danielson, Public-Works ir Kevin Batchelder, Administrative A t r1�: SUBJECT: Case No. 90-21: Batesville Casket Company - Variance and Lot Division DISCUSSION Batesville Casket Company is seeking to relocate from Eagan, NIN and has asked Kiesland, Inc. to represent their proposed new development. Bruce Jones Architect has submitted plans for Kiesland showing a 30,000 square foot office/warehouse to house Batesville Casket Company on Lot 4 of Block 1, Northland Plaza. They are proposing a shared drive with Lota3 due to some severe grades and conflicts with an NSP pipeline utility easement. Lot Division Batesville's proposed development is too large to fit on Lot 4. They propose to reconfigure Lots 3 and 4 to accommodate their proposed office/warehouse. This lot reconfiguration can be done without a public hearing as a simple lot division, if the reconfiguration results in two new lots that totally conform to the Zoning Ordinance's minimum size and width requirements. Their proposal, as submitted, meets the requirement of one (1) acre minimum with one hundred feet (100') of frontage. Approval of the lot division should be subject to the receipt of a Certificate of Survey establishing the new lot line. Variances The applicants are requesting two variances, one on the driveway setback and another on the side yard setback abutting a street for their designated future expansion (along Highway 55). The driveway setback variance is requested for the purpose of allowing a shared entrance for Lots 3 and 4. The City's standard driveway width is twenty five feet (25') at the curb. The plan shows a driveway width of thirty feet (30') and it needs to be reduced to twenty five feet (25') where it intersects Northland %rive. Due to the wide right-of-way width that exists along Highway 55, the applicant is also applying for a twenty foot (20' ) side yard abutting a street variance to allow for a forty four foot (44') wide future expansion. ACTION REQUIRED Meet with the applicant, driveway and building setback to the City Council. JED/KLB:kkb review the requested lot division and variances and make a recommendation PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION RE�UESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 26 June 1990 GZ�� Bruce Jones for Kiesland Inc. Lots 3& 4 Northland Plaza Plan Approval, Subdivision Approval, Variance 1. The subject property is: located east of Northland drive as it curves northward on the east side of Highway 55. This property is also prominently situated in the �orthwest quadrant of Highway 55 and I-35E. The land is zoned for industrial use several years ago, at which time roads and utilities were installed. While it is currently undeveloped, there is little doubt that this land would eventually be developed since it has good visibility from both I-35E and Highway 55. 2. The applicant is proposing to adjust the lot line between Lots 3& 4 in order to enlarge � Lot 3 to allow for the development of an office/warehouse to be occupied by the Batesville Casket (..�mpany. The applicant intends to retain ownership of Lot 4 6 and develop it at a future date. A survey of the existing lots has been provided by Mr. Jones, as well as a site plan indicating the proposed location of the new lot line between Lots 3& 4. Under Section 11.3(1) of the Subdivision Ordinance, a property owner may relocate the property line between two platted lots without the need for a public hearing if the resulting lots meet the minimum requirements of the Ordinance. In this case both the existing and proposed lots meet the minimum requirements of the ordinance. The proposed lot reconfiguration of itself appears to present no other problems with respect to the developability of either lot. 3. In addition to reconfiguring the lots, the applicant is proposing to provide access to both lots via a shared driveway as indicated on the site plan. This proposal, while it may limit the type of development that can occur on Lot 4 in the future, has several advantages. First, it reduces the number of driveway access points, and thus, the number of turning movements o�to Northland Drive. Northland Drive curves sharply in the area of the subject property and this design could help mitigate the safety concerns associated with traffic movements on sharp curves. In addition, this combined access drive could be located, as indicated on the site plan, further from the intersection of Highway SS. This would allow more stacking distance for the right turn lane at Northland Drive and Highway 55 and would also reduce the co�flicts with traffic coming to and from the subject property. Fi�ally, the shared driveway proposal allows for access to Lot 4 to be provided at Kiesland, Inc., Case No. 90-21 Page 2 a point where the existing grade is less severe, thereby avoiding the need for retaining walls or steep side slopes which create maintenance problems. 4. The disadvantage of the shared driveway layout is that it may limit the future development of Lot 4. The single driveway could create on-site traffic flow problems which may limit the development potential to projects that require less parking capacity. In addition, the layout of any potential future development would have to conform to the proposed shared driveway location and elevation. Since the proposed driveway is essentially designed to accommodate Lot 3, which is significantly lower in elevation than Lot 4, there would be additional grading required to develop Lot 4 under ti�is scenario versus if Lot 4 were developed irrdependently. While th�s in no way precludes development on Lot 4, it would make it more difficult and more costly. 5. The applicant is seeking a variance from the required front yard setback along Highway 55 for the future expa�sion of the building. As indicated on the site plan, the setback along this property line after the building is expanded, would be 20 feet. The front yard setback for buildings in this district is 40 feet, and therefore, a variance of 20 feet would be required. The intent of the front yard requirement is to maintain adequate green space within developed areas in order to preserve the aesthetic cha, acter of the City and avoid the condition where the view of private property from the adjacent public roadway is domi�ated by structures built too close to the road. In this- particular instance there are several factors that should be considered when reviewing the applicant's request for variance to the front yard requirement along Highway 55. First, the subject property is located adjacent to Highway 55 in an area where the boulevard is significa�tly wider than usual. The site plan indicates a distance of 105 feet between the edge of the curb and the property line. This is more than ample boulevard space even for a trunk highway such as Highway 55. Generally, the ROW along Highway SS includes additional space to allow for future expansion. However, Highway 55 has already been upgraded in the area adjacent to the subject property, and we are aware of no plans for further improvements. The 105 foot boulevard together with the 20 foot proposed setback results in a distance of more than 125 feet to the nearest travelled lane. Another factor to be considered with regard to the setback variance is the element of existing or proposed screening to reduce the impact of potential views of the structure. The elevated topography of this site and lack of vegetation between the proposed building location and the travelled lanes of Highway 55 make this site very visible from passing vehicles. Put simply, there is no existing screening. The site plan shows minimal landscaping along the property line adjacent to Highway 55. Five linden trees are shown on the plan, spaced approximately 50 feet apart. In order to provide any meaningful softening of the building in this area, a minimum spacing of 30 feet is recommended. The berm, which is shown on the grading plan, would be removed when the building is expanded. The proposed 20-foot setback area is not adequate to allow for any significant berming. Kiesland, Inc., Case No. 90-21 Page 3 One final element in the evaluation of the potential impact on the surrounding area, as a result of the variance request, relates to the appearance of the structure itself. An elevation of the east side of the structure is provided on Sheet Two of the applicant's plans. This elevation shows the entryway, which is one �of the few architectural interruptions in an otherwise relatively typical concrete warehouse. Unfortunately, this feature is located on the opposite side of the building from Highway SS and I-494. No elevation is provided for the west side of the building. However, from the plan we can see that .. no windows are proposed for that side of the building, so we can speculate that from Highway 55 the building would present a relatively monotonous 230-foot-long wall only interrupted by two narrow metal bands. The surface tTeatment is i�tended to be vertically ribbed, pre-cast, concrete panels. While architecturally treated concrete is among the materials permitted for use on building exteriors in the ordinance, most of the buildings in the nearby office/industrial area are constructed of brick. There is also no elevation showing the south side of the building that faces I-494. As seen on the site plan, the loading docks are proposed to be located on this side of the structure. Though this side of the building would be visible from the. freeway, no landscaping or other screening are provided along the south property line. 6. The proposed layout would require variances from the required interior side yard along the proposed realig�ed lot line between Lots 3 and 4. This is the result of the fact that the centerline of the shared access drive is proposed to be located on the lot line. It would also be necessary to issue a side yard variance for Lot 4 to allow the construction of the portion of the access drive located on this lot. Since the side yard setback for parking areas a�d drives in this district is 10 feet, the variance would be for the full 10 feet. As discussed earlier, there are several advantages to the shared driveway scheme from a traffic safety standpoint. 7. In summary, the layout of the site as illustrated by the site and grading plans demonstrates that the building is clearly to be too big for � the site. Even after relocating the property line, utilizing a shared access drive, and laying out the site in the most efficient manner the project still requires three variances to the setback requirements and leaves little space for screening from the adjace�t public roadways, particularly with regard to the view of the loading area from I-494. Further, the building is located on a parcel which is highly visible from both Highway 55 and Interstate 494 and offers little in the way of aesthetic appeal or landscaping. While the shared access drive offers distinct advantages from the standpoint of traffic safety, these advantages are somewhat offset by the complications created for the development of the remaining lot 4. • � � � � t - � GENTRE P NTE QQIM`" ; • • � r x� • \\ , -= F`j • • • T``r�� • . �. � � � • � _ _ _ - _ - � � , • • � '_ _ _ � / ` � � ' • * - s =- - ' a� . '. ,� . :; :F-= - _ -_ / , t�.. • " , ; ., ,� - - - � , �1 S _ �� -.y'�_ a ' � )/�//1 . . � jjf�t �. G4�T1'��+ i /, I( � ,t�If � '� ' =z -- g� u� E'c`��oN � t ' » ;�:` .:� _ _ _ _ � • .. ; -- ,s— p ,: •---- ' F''s' r =� – --^ � •— '•�• --._ .. _ � _.. -j�' '•' . .i '--'* =YC�AisC�JN rcTarr • _ _ � `�� j ' - — � . i � _ – � (J . • • , ,, —_ ��` �--- ,� �� ; 1 �}� � � — =- '� . i `"(�_ � _ , _ CEM TERY ( I • �.. ; ii � • - — r '/� ,' - - —_— —, • / � ` \ s � . .�-.� � • L-._ '� �� f �� n .I i • • ;• . /! � i F, � � • � J4ausottur ' ' � ``i i� � t 1� R R9 '` «r1..�r`A � r '�{1 � �� 1 � ? ( G �•;'` . • yiz"�";�� .J -a-�. ^ �� 1 � � �, t � p � i' � "-"`'� _ • _3�. _, � - � �.s' „ „" j 1 s- _ �'_` - • ' 1 r� '_ ; . . a g I,� � r=i-- _ �� , �� -� ,, �_ q �� ` : . , r; f = - __- � �, - - : � � �1 ;�� ; _ .._ i` �'.�' '( ��! -- — -_ � �� -�—''�� ' q n. +. ! f � � k jl'� , __ _ _--- 'f ii r� � � ��j rr - _ � � — ' � +� ' J — ; � _ _ . �, , i ( ! � # %-==" - ` ` � -.1-._�___1�---' � � „ . �`-=__ , - ,� -' ; �� ; - - _ i / \ � � � - . _- - ' � �� +�.r.� � �..Y._ _ �.,T. � �+4iEA * JwS4 � . _ �.._' J.r. ' �� - _ ' \� / ` `� ' �� = M � � '1' �"'c�-�" -- ;' ,.., . �, � � � J' ��.= r, ," `� _. �, �~, � i i � . N r� f ; '\ � �' � ,.. B� . � . •'' �� ,, ��, i ' � 1 i �i ;� � 1 ___! � ,, , i ; - --- ; ---- ; �.��> : _ --� l. >I > . � _.� � , � : . . , : r 1 �I ;.a. � � � � _ � c'� � ��_�� . � � � � -�— - - - _. HEIOliTS � ._ r �� SUBJECT PR{)PERTY ;; t ,, � - - - � ��j�■r� � 1 f��! � �' _ � „ `';�� . �� W -�- N�RTN T �, �: � ; .- � � , � �: ��\� ' � � :W � � SCA�E 1N=800' . . � �:�� ,�, �; ' ,.\� , • f• � , . � � � NQRTMIAND OR7YE --�-.�..�� • ; � � � 1 ' \ HQRTNIPN t� \+ /•��` ' , _._' � � � i � ' , •••�/ , �--� :.r..... .__�{'�'�'R'i �i: � \e ? � � �� ./�� _,� - .� \'. �pRTNtNr SfdTfS ?RO"[• CO. � � \�./'"� �/.'Y^'�� -I-- � G.._.�� \1 , , ��~ f - '� � � V ' .' _ . . , . • _..-.-1-. �._ __� `'i^�' �r : : �i 'r � . ��' �\ /It� i • � � . f / . . ' . ' �^ `._.s._ � ._� . . J -�-�.-. . �. _ . �J"'-� _ ' � � `� y • � � � ,, . . _ _ . .._.. _ .... . . . _ _ .. ._ . -- , . � \�\` . . �. �.I ; � ' - • . �,�� , � � �- � ��, �� : , -r, � _� ;�`�� I �I 1 f% �--1..--" � . __.._. �-----'`��. � ` 1 . ; ; . . /- \` . , r �.� , _.._, . 1� � ��::,�` .�:` ��- . �.��„ - - ' . N � J � t ¢E s� ��-% 7 :LES M. PERRor�l 4-�� s�G Z 61 O$- A Pcr-i-o n , _'� Ac _ .i� •� � � �•. ) M�D�I a� — ��.a.ir-+�.a�� v � � n ay��uvy e v• •. . .� - ' A I � �7a ?, 3 : �•..�� Z�o.oc � / pN 3 �� =� �� tD n 3�A R� OF M a , c o, � � ;- 4 0 � •/.5 � r7 � o , 3=�o jfsT•�'�" o l N 89°5 '�14'� E � N,� I R/� v c/ � 3%� �)� N G r% , 7� Z � . � � . �� < - I�1 � Z �- zs3 . � ti . "T — M V ^ a �� % S 62 2 �8 3 N67°� ay a � S'So5�:�9 5 3��' � G� �� f �5„ f _--26982- .;= ��' zz•is'so• 6 � � rr, � q,�e ,? r � WEST hry� ,: s er � � 2 ' ti �.iD .�•22'12'Is^ A�� O � � ' ' �:. e , i i �.ea � o -� 6: o. ��A RT O F.a _ E ,�No < . P - � � �� Q)` 366 g� w A=3°51'43 �,� � �' `�� QlC/ � �IQ 52.47 : � o � . � � � J I 2o O �' � �j� �%` z 2 ti 2y� � � . -0 20 �9,� ;-� p 4 � - j� �3 L � � � �� . •;, .:;:�: R• nZ= Bq'LB'48' •r 0.0Q , '�:. � ,O �� , �Y �T � � °% ,r � � ` `s i- � -� �, �'�, Q � V ��2 �' 4p9 S3 '' � -� . F„ v� a � a J � � .9 � �/ /� Jn 'i i W ` .ii pN � Q 9� I'' .� F� A ft T !" F ,D T m, i� Z � v 7 p � `' � . � '.+. � `fl ZNC � � �� • �, � � Z,�r�'° ' � .. �� / 9'� / � `• .�� _ __"___�_ ' _ _ ' �,/' �_' "'� ., —_ '_ / ; / �c v� � i o � � d�lgo4627•. i p N � r a� , 255.09 � ; � � � s; Q�3e. (� � �e�=' a' R.�a:�o � ✓ r�-e�2ies' % .� zo - - - �.�. �6 AZ=B'P2�E6" 2: .1?6jo� Y19.26 O '. C'4Z.�Z7e Spz•� A2•269'21�b6•• f��,2.. , ; c� 1 7R � SUBJECT PROPERTY � NORTH T � SCALE 1 "=200' ' '__ 4 ' ' _ _' '— ' " ' �o/ �M1 ti � tig' V` �/'ry � ' Z O F- Q H O a. � z Q N ' � w � o � :`.J � H a '° W . m � N • z z G CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90 - RESOLUTION APPROVING VAROAMCES FOR AND THE DIVISION OF LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, NORTHLAND PLAZA WHEREAS, owner of Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Northland Plaza, Dakota County, Minnesota has requested from the City to divide said lots into two lots according to the plan submitted, dated 6-29-90; and " WHEREAS, the applicant has also requested two variances, one for roadway setbacks for lots 3 and 4 to allow a shared driveway and one for a twenty foot (20' ) side yard abutting a street setback on Lot 4; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said lot division and variances and finds that the requested lot division and variances will have no adverse effect on the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the community and surrounding land. F NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, that the lot division submitted at this meeting be and the same is hereby approved subject to the submittal of a Certificate of Survey more precisely defining the new lot line; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that ten foot (10') setback variances be approved for Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Northland Plaza and a twenty foot (20') for side yard abutting a street setback variance be approved for Lot 4, Block 1, Northland Plaza. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this tenth day of July, 1990. By ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor � � ... �. .,. �.�. .. u... . i..v. _ iYJVUl !\c:<)A�qR=: it7 COtSL•ii i1G �P� 1��eR$ L•'�ti�SC_�E �.Ct-�� ='�CTS - • ' 300 FIRST AL"E�'U'E i�O�TH S?.iITE �10 �a11`ti;�a�przg;'"ti'r_�,T' S��01 6i�-339-33'JQ � ��IIM - - DATE: 16Iu1y 1990 '�O. �3on.orable Ma�or and 1VLembets of the City Coim�. FROM: T'im Mallay, �lann.er RE- Sit� Plan revisions, for Batesa�Ie Casket Comp�n.y warehouse � proposal, case mm�ber 90-2L In res�ons� to sr�esfiozcs'a#��red by rhe Citp Counc�.i at its Iast mee�.g, the a�plicant Iias made re^c�si.ans ta the site plarz if4r.�e proposed w�r�ause on I.oi 4 and a portian of I,ot 3, �Iock 3. � the North�and P1,aza and�stcial subdivision. 3n this memo we w�,( discuss the r�vised site plari based on.our review af the m,ateria.ls z'ecentiy submitted and aur discussion 1vi.th lt/Ir. Bruce �ones, archi�ect for th.e pmject. 'To avaid z�epe3ition, we c�d not revi�w aII of the 1ssu� co�vered m our oxz�nai. pla�� report, but w� concentrate or� the Ghanges proposed by the appIican't. . ��.9,NNT.�IC� CQNSIDII2ATIOI`rS .... . The I�.po� o� rh� revised pIan. e1irn��tes �e need�ar a varian.ce from �}l.e bi.u�d"mg setbar.�C requirem.ent alang the west property Iine, adjacent to I�z�.way 55, by widenin� the I.ot bp 25 feet east to west T#�e• east/�vest bu�di.n� d�zxcension. is also reduced from 1,75 fe�t az� the previous pIa� {includin� th� �e e�a�sion area) to �74 feet The ori�.al pla�x showed a total bu�dzng area of 30;OQQ square feet w�ith 1,0,000 square feet ind"zeated for futru+e �xpa.nsioa_ Th;s expansxan ar�'a is not included on. #h� cxtrrent plan. The applicaIIt has noi iadicated wheth.er fui�lr� expansion af the bu�di�; is s�I contempIated. In additio�, the bu�dina s uc�rth/south dime�sion i� reduc�d fi�m Z30 feet ta 174 fe�x Tlus reduces the �pact of the view o� the sirqcLzire fram H�i�way S5_ No c�an�e h�s be�. made'to the materials proposed ��r the exterioz' sar�ace t�.�.ent of tb;e b�d�g. The revlsed pian alsa s�ZQws rhe•Ioading area relocat�d ta the �ast side ofthe bu�Zd�g �*�'hea-fram I-494. The desi�t �or th.e Ioadi�g docks inGludes an area. for �Ilowing tru�cks to pull forwa�d onto r.ot 3'and bac�up to th� loading docks. This 50 �aatwide p�c►ed are�. exien.ds 60 feei fcut�ter onto �.ot 3 than the east edge Q�'the shared d�vewap_ '�'fus lapaut zs preferred sincs it is co�sidered sa�er a.ad easier, aIlawin� the driver to Iao� out rhe Ie.�t side of the tsuc.�. as he is b2�Cking up_ One alt�aiive, wluch wouid Ma�or ana City Cfl�c'r.i Mem�ers, Fattesva.i�e Cas�e# Fab�e 2 a:cco�adate r.his ma�euver ou-sit� wouid be ta have t�e trucd�s puIl forwa�d anto the paved area tha� �e�ads ta the sautk af the bu�c� and s�h.en I�ack int4 �e Ioadiag da� This wouId require driv�s ta reiy no�o3ce au thefr mfrrors when bac�ng up. The pa�k�g area an the north side of t��.e bn�c3.� ac�aee�t t� Northland Drive, is pz�oposed to be moved bac� appra�matelp 34 feet mai�m.g tb.e total cii.stan.ce, from� the --- north�propertyIin� ta tYce t�n amcmd, 54 feet_ This r�vision alluws for additional Ia�.dscapmg and ez�ances #he appeazance of the ent�y area However, the appIi,cant has reduoed tbe n�ber of parI�ing staIls provided from 24 t� 12 1he praJect req�es 21. stalls by ordinan.ce,. W%'Ie t�is use may need Iess than the reqwored parkin� the Coua� may �ish ta ha.ve the addiiion.al �a.rl�ag installed at �his time in tha evea�t that this bu�diag is conve�ted to anather t�se at sonae p�i�zt m the fimue. Shouid the Couac�l wish, tb.ere � ample ��m to prwide �te adc�i�ion�. s�11s in. tbis area of the site,. 'The revised site plaa mainfai�s the sbared drivew�ay between Lots 3 and 4, the advanta�es and disadvantages of whieh where c1;�rc.�rT m. our c�ri�al Pian� report dated 7tm.e 26, 199U. Lirtie can. be said about auy c�ang� in the impack to Lot 3 due to the proposed revi�i.ons smve av �rac�g plan was i�c�Jt�ded wirb. the revised site pIan. $owever, iaa dis�sAig tbe r�ons with Mr. Jones he inc�,i,cated that t1�e elevation of the bu�d'nYg pad for thegroposed o�Ce warehouse wauId ��m the same as � the p��vzous pJan. ,As a resu�r, we �vauId ba.ve the sa�me conaerBs with reaard to addi.�.a�nai. g�ading an Lot 3 as r�b. the o�gia�a� plaz�, The propose�, relaca�'on, of tb.e Iot Iine betweea�. Lots 3 a�ad 4 wvuld ta.ise no addi�ianaY arncen�s ather than. tb.ose di.scussed �. our pre�rious pian� report The rem�g Lot 3 stt�I ateets fbte r.n�uzt� Iot st-a.nda.rds iu the ordinaIIGe. The la�dscap�g sh�w�t QA �the revised site pl�n is generallp improvecl� Ta fiuther soften �he wesewall vf the bur�lr`.n�, tI�e spac�ng of tl�.e Summit 14sb. ia this area cauld be reduced to 25 Qr 3Q feet aIlowina ana�her iree io be added. Othes�wise, the spac�n.; of the plantings is a�ppropriate. Witb. the �xaep��a of the 2-1/2 imcb� � Oaks, the si�g o£ th.e pIants �is a.I,so reasanabi� though not geaerou$. The Fin Oak is aman� the �aster �owu� af the oak species. Aowever, the pi.ant is s�i generaI�y slvw gr+aw�g and it wotzld mauy years befare these �rees would provide an.p siguificant scxeetiin� �Vh�.e there is na i�dic�an where thep are takeu, tb.e �x sectioa.s submittezl vvith. the orig�al plan suggest that due ta the e�s�g grade cha�age between the subject praperiy and the driv�m�g Ia.nes of the adiacent freeway and ramp, the structure as previ.ously proposed could be s�tbstantiali.y screeeued from I 3�� and �-494 by iaistaiJmg a�udsca.ped beru� near tfie south p�aperty ime. Thou�. the el�.an aE the bu�ding pad has not be�a c�a�ged, the south wall af the struc�ura has beeu sbifted 5 feet doser ta rhe south p�periy %.� As a resuI� �he pragosed sedian drdwin� do nat aocurate�p demo�strate the vist'b�iip of the revi.sed proposaL The pIantmgs �hown au tt�e bezzzx iao� �te r�vised plan ha.ve beeu va.st�y ian�proved. Th� number af Anmr Ma�1e shaw7a bas been mcxeased by ten times. A cliaster of evergreea�s ba.s i�. added as we� as seveza� mvre deciduous trees. GeneraIly the rev�-�ed pIa�. �Qr �e berm appears to pravide adequate scxe�nin� for ��-+�r+e�- �vnths. The p1�n could be .inrproved by add"mg a fecv m�re �ver�eens along the lengtb. af the berm to pmvi,de 3ddisior�I scseetu�g i�t wiElter. Si�ce the app�.t propase.s ta ut�iize a portian of Loi 3 for truck m,aaeuveria8, the Cvuucai may wish ta have them egtend the � aud landscaping Proposed alang tI�e sauth pragerty Iine fizri�er tv the east ta sere.e�. this area firom the I-35E ram�p and I-494: A portio�. af the b�t aud several lrees are sh4wn off fiie properiyy wi�hioa� the �tdW for � �' — IViayor and Ciiy Co�c� Niembexsy Ba�esville Caske� Fage 3 F�Zg�va.y 55, on the south si+de of the Iot A-�.p pIantiag withi� the �ZOW wz�1, reqwa�e ap�roval from 1VI�DOT aud would he subJect to da�za.�e or remaval sbauid the Sfate make anY cba�es ta �.wa.Y 55, r�m� constru�iioa in this are� Yi1�� u : ; 1 Obviattsly this proposat, t{�ough improved, sh� 1oca�es a relatively uni.nterestm� tegtured ooncaete wareh:ouse bu�dina an � promm.ent pieoe of pro�st�t at the south�rn gat�way to the City_ However, the rec�sed plaa. represents a sigu.'t.�itcaut ioazpz'ove�e�tt over the pz�evxaus plan.. The impac.� of the bw7.ding on ��wap 55 has �een. d�ished by redu�in.g the Iength of t�.e bu�ci�g alang the west F�F�-Y �e az�d m�vmg t�e bux�dimg bac�c au th� Iat to wrtbin. #he setbac� The lan.dscapin� along this side of the �midmg l�as aTso be�. beefed up. 7'�e �iszb�ity of the bu�diaa from #be T 35E ramp aad Y�94 bas been impmped �p re�ocatfng the Ioad�g docks tct the ,west side of t�ie bwZd"m.g and substantiaI�y increasing the Jan.dsc�.pe buff�r alona the sou�h prap�riy liae� The previous plan was very #igbt on the Iot due ta the front yard setbacks on iwa sides �n.d the adclitianal paved area neves�y ta aocommodate truck maneuver�ng. '�'he �evised plam iaIIproves rhis situa�on. by recI�rcm� the s�e of the bw�,di�g bp 14,OUa squs�zre feet (the fi�re �pansian area) a�d lIIGI�3SIf�a ihe lot size �y ra�viu� adcii�ion spa.ce out of -the a�aceut lot to t�e �.ort�h. � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 13, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administrator FROM: Paul R. Berg ��8 � 6 Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: 3M Remodeling/Addition at 2465 Lexington (old Unisys Building) DISCUSSION• 3M has purchased the building at 2465 Lexington and has requested to be allowed to meet with City Council on 7-17-90 to introduce themselves and discuss proposed changes to their building. They are aware that some of the proposed things that they would like to seek approval will require meeting with staff and planner, planning commission and then City Council for approval. , 3M has submitted a letter, site plan, building elevations and an entry/landscape plan for staff and Council review. 3M intends to make modifications/addition to the old Unisys building. (See drawings and letter from 3M) Staff has noted that there maybe some planning commission issues regarding variance to proposed addition height and a proposed 6'6" fence to enclose 5 chillers proposed to be located at the southwest corner of their building. Also there will be other physical changes to the exterior of the building such as changing the location of the existing building entrance, adding windows in proposed office/cafeteria areas, eliminating truck docks and the relocation of truck docks on the east side of the building. " The small addition on the northwest corner of the building is proposed to be constructed of a metal panel construction. The existing building is constructed of a concrete wall panel. This addition is proposed to have a 55' height although our zoning ordinance allows a maximum of 45' building height. 3M is proposing to repaint the entire structure. A color has not been determined yet. �,�,¢�d,SL �J�p� (.c,,�`�;�� yh�-�-�''' �,"�o - 2so ;�.,. �. `�°�`� RECOMMENDATION• 0 Staff would recommend that City Council meet with the 3M � people and provide 3M and staff with direction as to City Council wishes in regards to their proposed project. Variances and special conditions should be reviewed by planner and planning commission and forward recommendation for City Council to consider. ACTION REQUIRED: Review with 3M their proposed project and provide direction to staff as to City Council wishes. n + p �„"„�." ' ""'� � l� � - � �� ,�„�, " A,,,�� '' i ,t 3M Facilities Engineering and Real Estate PO Box 33331 St. Paul, Minnesota 55133-3331 612/778 5049 July 12, 1990 City Manager City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Attention: Tom Lawell RE: BUILDING N0. 60 REMODELING MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA RFCES 34634 - PROJECT N0. 89-5853 Dear Tom, —�' I� -- - 3M Company recently purchased the existing facility at 2465 Lexington Avenue, Mendota Heights, Mi�nnesota, (the Unisys Building) and plans to do extensive interior remodeling to consolidate groups now occupying several areas through out 3M Center in Maplewood, Minnesota. The remodeling is planned to be constructed in phases with a final completion date of September 1, 1991, and is contemplated to house approximately 230 employees in 5 years. In conjunction with the interior remodeling, certain exterior modifications to the existing facility are required as follows: 1. Remove the existing front entry and construct a new 900 s.f. entry addition to house a reception area, interview rooms, dining space and toilets. 2. Create an outdoor plaza/seating/landscape area adjacent to the new entry. 3. Eliminate seven interior truck docks and utilize the area for a kitchen/cafeteria, vendor library, shipping/receiving and janitor supplies. Relocate three of the truck docks to the east exterior wall. 4. Convert interior warehouse space to offices requiring approximately 18 new exterior windows. 5. Construct a 60' x 92' building addition at the northwest corner of the existing facility to house several 3' diameter x 40' tall vessels for coating metal fibers. Page 2 t 6. Install mechanical equipment within fenced areas adjacent to the building. _ 7. Install two new boilers in existing Mechanical Room which require two new 24" diameter boiler stacks terminating 5 feet above closest roof elevation. It is requested that a representative of 3M Company be placed on the agenda of the July 17th, 1990 Mendota Heights City Council Meeting to present the proposed exterior modifications for approval. Sincerely, � � �� John H. Blum Architectural Engineering JHB:Iaw 6 � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 13, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ��=�� SUBJECT: Discussion of Expansion Plans at MSP INTRODUCTION As we discussed at the air noise workshop held June 11, 1990, the cities' neighboring MSP have expressed concern that the MAC is proceeding with the development of airport expansion plans without input from the Cities. It is the intent of this memo to discuss ways in which Mendota Heights can influence the airport planning process now being undertaken. As you may recall , the long term comprehensive plan of the short time line, we informally to include us in tY we have been assured that we letter from Mr. Jeff Hamiel), to do so. MAC owes to the State Legislature a for MSP by January 1, 1990. In light have asked NI�C both formally and �e plan development process. Although will be included (see June 20, 1990 we have not yet been invited by MAC Earlier in the week, we unexpectedly received a letter from the Minnesota Advisory Council on Metropolitan Airport Planning inviting us to give testimony to the Council on July 24, 1990. A copy of this letter is attached for your information. Additionally, you may recall that the City of been actively advocating for the adoption of a community airport planning process" by the MAC in o community input. The City of Richfield has adopted a support of such process, and has asked other communities to do likewise. DISCUSSION Richfield has "interactive rder to insure Resolution in neighboring In terms of our invitation to testify before the Advisory Council, as you can see from the letter, they have requested specific information regarding our position on the dual track process. More specifically, the Council is curious about the formal Mendota Heights position regarding physical expansion at the airport versus the future replacement of the current airport with a new airport at a different site. In addition, the Council also asks questions regarding iahat Mendota Heights stands to gain or lose should the airport be either expanded or moved. . � During the next week, staff will be preparing our actual written testimony for this hearing, and thus would like to reaffirm the City's position regarding these issues. Previously, the City Council adopted a Resolution strongly opposing any runway design option which includes a northern parallel runway due to the associated negative impacts on the City of Mendota Heights (see attached Resolution No. 90-27). It would be staff's intention to read this Resolution at the hearing and to submit a copy as written testimony. With regard to possible relocati�on of MSP, at the workshop we discussed the fact that it was difficult to take a stand one way or the other on this issue until such time as the dual track process had run its course. More specifically, the true impact of a relocated MSP is unknown until such time as a site is chosen and a time frame for moving the airport is decided. In terms of the gains or loses which will accrue to Mendota Heights given the ultimate decision to expand or move MSP, it is impossible to quantify such data at the present time. We could certainly talk about general impacts such as either a reduction or increase in air noise, and whatever affects may accrue to our different types of land uses. RECOMMENDATION 4 Although we are happy to participate in the State Advisory Council hearing, this is clearly not the forum we anticipated providing City input. Furthermore, in that our testimony is limited to twenty minutes, it is not likely that we will have much of an opportunity to learn about tfie process the MAC is currently following in developing its long range plans. For these reasons, staff feels that our true objective in this hearing process should be to convince the MAC to undertake a collaborative planning process with all communities neighboring MSP. In conjunction with this request, we should also request that the MAC be given a time extension beyond January 1, 1991, to allow sufficient time for meaningful public input. To that end, it is recommended that the Council adopt the attached Resolution expressing support for the collaborative community planning process. In addition, it is suggested that staff be directed to prepare written testimony for the hearing on July 24th setting forth the City's position on the questions posed. ACTION REQUIRED Should the Council so desire, a motion accepting staff's recommendation would be in order. In addition, any additional information which the Council would like to see included as part of our testimony should be discussed. MTL:�kb p0�15 $q�ry ?k•P t ' 4 2 i L S � n yt O a t� O N 7 � o, � 9 t C'� ti a oR�Z June 20, 199� • Sc�� P�� METR POLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION P. O BOX 11700 • TVJIN CITY AIRPORT • MINNESOTA 55111 Mr. Tom Lawell City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Tom: PHONE (612) 726-1892 Thank you very much for your letter of May 22, 1990, expressing the City of Mendota Heights' concerns regarding expansion plans and runway configurations presently being contemplated for the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. As you have indicated in your letter, there are several design options under consideration at the present time that have been presented to the Planning and Environment Committee of the Metropolitan Airports Commission. At the present time the Commission staf£ is working on an overall plan that would permit the incorporation of communities adjacent to the airport into the decision making process. I very much appreciate your inclusion of the City'� resolution and I can assure you that it will be part of our deliberation as we develop a process for community involvement. The Commission fully understands the concerns the City of Mendota Heights might have regarding the addition of a third parallel runway at the airport. Prior to the Commission taking any action, we will certainly coordinate and request the involvement of Mendota Heights in the decision making process. The decision making time line is aggressive and we do anticipate preliminary expansion alternative decisions in mid to late 1990 in preparation for submittal of the complete report to the Legislature by 1991. Once Commission staff and the Commission has approved a procedure for community involvement in the decision making process I will notify you regarding your participation. It is my hope that the City of Mendota Heights, in cooperation with all communities adjacent to the airport, will be actively involved in helping the Commission through this difficult decision-making process. Again, thank you very much for taking the time to write, I fully understand your concerns expressed, and will notify you at the appropriate time. Sincerely, o��'� . Hamiel Director The Metropolitan Airports Commission is an equal opportunity employer OFFICE LOCATION-6040 28th AVE. SO.—WEST TERMINAL AREA—MINNEAPOLIS-SAINT PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Legislators Senator John Marty Senator Bill Belanger Representa.tive Jean Wagenius Representa.tive Jerry Knickerbocker Public Members Suzanne Sandahl Minneapolis John T. Richter Minneapolis Eve Webster Northfield t11 Loehr St. Cioud Hugh Schilling St. Paul Dave Danielson Chisholm State Agency Heads Commissioner Leonard Levine Transportation Commissioner Lani Kawamura State Planning Commissioner Gerald Willet Pollution Control Metro Agency Representatives Thomas Holloran MAC Chairman Sam Grais MAC Commissioner Steve Keefe Council Chairman Donald Stein Councilmember Aviation Industry Repreaentativea Tim Thornton Northwest Airlines Craig Hayes Delta Airlines Nonvoting Membere Frank Benson Manager, Mpls. Airport Office Elaine Kienitz Congressional Appointee State Council Staff Jill Schultz Senate Research Tom Todd House Research Paula Hanson (612) 296-3205 Legislative Assistant MINNESOTA ADVISORY COUNCIL ON METROPOLITAN AIRPORT PLANNING Senator Keith Langseth Co-chair July 9, 1990 Representative Bernie Lieder Co-chair Tom Lawell, City Administrator Mendota Heights City Office . � 1101 Victoria Curv Mendota Heights, Dear Mr. Lawell, e MN 55118 The State Advisory Council o� Metropolitan Airport Planning, created by the Minnesota Legislature as part of the airport dual track planning process, is holdirig a meeting July 24, 9:00 am to noon, at the Metropoli�tan Airports Commission headquarters, to hear testimony from the six communities surrounding the airport. � � Representatives from Minneapolis, St. Paul, Richfield, Eagan, Bloomington and Mendota Heights have all agreed to testify. We would ask each city to limit its tes- timony to 20 minutes and to address the following questions. � 1. Does yourcommunity support or oppose the physical expansion of the current airport through the addition of one or more runways and the expansion of terminal facilities? Does your community support or oppose the future replacement of the current airport with a new � airport at a different site? How does your community;s position on a new airport hinge on its location? ; 2. What does your community stand to gain or lose if the current airport is physically expanded? What does your community stand to gain or lose if the current airport is replaced by a new airport a different site? (Please address the economic impacts.) G-24 State Capitol, St. Paul, MN 55155 S , 3. If your community were to emphasize three points that it wished policymakers involved in the dual track planning process would remember, what would they be? We are fully aware each of the communities has a great number of other concerns and opinions about current activities at the air- ._ port such as the extension of runway 4-22 and the runway usage system. Because of the charge and_focus of this group, we ask that community representatives limit their testimony to the air- port development questions above. We ask that if any of the proposed runway options the MAC is cur- rently consid�ring in its work on the long term comprEher.si�� plan have specific impacts on your community that you would sup- port or oppose, that you would address these. We look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, ��I - ' -�--� ./%2c�.� Se ator Keith Langseth Representative Bernie Lieder Co-Chair Co-Chair MINNESOTA ADVISORY COUNCIL ON METROPOLITAN AIRPORT PLANNING LEGISLATORS Senator Keith Langseth G-24 Capitol St. Paul, MN 55155 296-3205 / C�i Lc`� �.l�C //l iL•' Senator (� ' �- �. -] �c�.� , St. Paul, MN 55155 296-5645 Senator William Belanger 107 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 296-5975 Representative Bernie Lieder 527 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 296-5091 Representative Jean Wagenius 545 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 296-4200 Rep. Jerry Knickerbocker 283 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 296-4315 . PUBLIC MEMBERS Suzanne Sandahl Eve Webster 1518 E. Lake St, Suite 210 22 Bridge Square Minneapolis, MN 55407 Northfield, MN 55057 722-2693 � (507) 663-1215 John T. Richter 3315 Cedar Lake Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55416 922-9496 Dave Danielson RR1 101d Chisholm, MN 55719 A1 Loehr 203 16th Ave. No. St. Cloud, MN 56301 252-2403 Hugh Schilling 354 Woodlawn St. Paul, MN 55105 STATE AGENCY HEADS Transportation Commissioner (or designee) Transportation Building �� u�� John Ireland Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55155 296-3000 State Planning Commissioner Lani Kawamura (or designee) Third Floor, Centennial Office Building 658 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55155 297-2325 Pollution Control Commissioner Gerald Willet (or designee) 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155 296-7301 ' Metro Agency Representatives MAC Chairman Thomas Holloran Council Chairman Steve Keefe College of St. Thomas Mears Park Centre Box 5005, 2115 Summit Ave. 230 E. Fifth Street St. Paul, 1�I 55105 St. Paul, I�IN 55101 647-5542 • 291-6390 MAC Commissioner Sam Grais 740 River Drive, Apt. 8E St. Paul, MN 55116 699-5066 Councilmember ponald Stein 11721 Evergreen Circle NW Coon Rapids, I�IN 55433 755-3333 Aviation Industrv Representatives a'��'�---'-� : General Counse�Cc."��c �� `�� + �, � � Northwest Airlines Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport St. Paul, 1�1 55111 726-2111 Craig Hayes, Regional Manager Properties Delta Airlines Dept 880 Hartsfield Airport � Atlanta, GA 30320 (404) 765-2145 Nonvotinq Members Frank Benson, Manager Minneapolis Airport District Office FAA Air-.ports District Office 6020 28th Ave. S., Room 102 Minneapolis, I�i 55450 725-4221 Elaine Rienitz, Congressional Delegation Apppointee 462 Federal Court� BL�lding ' 110 S. Fourth Street Minneapolis, I�I 55401 348-1649 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAROTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90- 2� A RESOLIITION OPPOSING THE METROPOLITAN AIRPORT COMMISSION�S AIRPORT EXPANSION DESIGNS FOR A NORTHERN PARALI�EL RIINWAY � WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights would like to restate its concern with the current state of aircraft overflights and ... associated noise over the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights currently receives a disproportionate amount of air noise impacts due to current aircraft overflights and procedures; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Airport Commission recently received Runway Design Options for possible expansion of Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport; and WHEREAS, two of the four design options for runway expansion consist of northern parallel runways that would significantly increase the disproportionate air noise impacts that are already victimizing the City of Mendota Heights. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that�the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights strongly opposes any runway design options that include a northern parallel runway and its associated negative impacts for the City of Mendota Heights. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Mendota Heights recognizes the Metropolitan Airport Commission's timelines for a decision on the runway options and feels it is the Metropolitan Airport Commission's duty and obligation to include our community in any and all decisions regarding airport expansion. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this lst day of May 1990. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By ��, z� /'Lt�-.,.� Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTES : �• Ka leen M. Swanson, City Clerk City of Richfield • 6700 Portland Avenue • Minnesota 55423-2599 City Manager Mayor James D. Prosser Steve Quam July 5, 1990 Mr. Tom Lawell City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr � ell: Council Edwina Garcia lvan Ludeman Martin Kirsch Michael Sandahl On June 25, 1990, the Richfield City Council adopted Resolution No. 7644 in support of an interactive community airport planning process to be initiated by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) at MSP airport. I enclosed a copy of the resolution for your information. . The MAC will need to continue to make capacity enhancements at MSP airport to allow it to remain viable in�the next generation. These capacity enhancement plans may have adverse environmental impacts on the airport border communities. It is imperative that these affected communities and the MAC develop a process to collaboratively identify mutually agreeable measures to mitigate any adverse environmental impacts. I encourage all the communities surrounding MSP airport to approve similar resolutions in support of this concept. The resolutions will persuade the MAC to initiate the formation of an interactive community airport planning group with representatives from all border communities, the MAC, Met Council and FAA. I appreciate your support on this very important issue. SQ:kab Enclosure Telephone 861-9700 (612) Fax 861-9749 An Equal Opportunity Employer CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLIITION NO. 90 - RESOLIITION EXPRESSING 3IIPPORT FOR COLLABORATIVE COMMIINITY AIRPORT PLANNING PROCESS WHEREAS, by Laws 1989, Chapter 279 (the Act), the Legislature directed the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) to adopt a long-term comprehensive plan for the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP) at its existing location; and AHEREAS, said plan must satisfy air transportation needs for a prospective 20 year period and must be accompanied by a concept plan for MSP, including an estimate of facilities requirements, to satisfy the air transportation needs for an additional ten year period; and WHEREAS, the Act requires that such plan must describe: (1) aviation demand and air transportation needs, (2) airport capacity limits and potential, (3) facilities requirements, (4) a plan for physical development, (5) airport operational characteristics, (6) compatibility with metropolitan and local physical facility systems, (7) environmental effects, (8) safety, and (9) the effect on the neighboring communities; and AHEREAS, current operations at MSP and future operations as they may be altered by future airport capacity enhancements have adverse environmental impacts on the neighboring communities of Minneapolis, St. Paul, Bloomington, Richfield, Mendota Heights and Eagan, which effects must be identified and considered in the planning process; and WHEREAS, measures to mitigate such environmental impacts such as sound insulation, sound abatement, redevelopment and clearance should be identified and considered in the planning process; and WHEREA3, cities adjacent to MSP may either facilitate or impede appropriate airport improvements by such activities as development, redevelopment, construction of capital improvements and regulation of land use; and AHEREAS, such activities by adjacent communities may also be frustrated by decisions made by MAC and about MS.P �improvements; and WHEREAS, it is therefore not sound public policy to undertake planning for capacity enhancements at MSP or identification of adverse impacts and means of mitigating them without participation by the communities most effected; and � � WHEREAS, there is no process in place for effective exchange of such information between MAC and neighboring communities. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the Metropolitan Airports Commission initiate a collaborative community airport planning process; and 2. That the planning process include the cities of .- Minneapolis, St. Paul, Richfield, Bloomington, Mendota Heights and Eagan; and - 3. That the purpose of the collaborative interactive planning process be to identify airport adverse environmental impacts on communities surrounding the airport and identify mutually agreeable measures to mitigate these adverse impacts; and 4. That this information be considered as part of the MAC capital improvement planning process and documents; and 5. That this process be initiated as soon as possible; and 6. That the information gathered as part of the interactive planning process be forwarded toge�her with the MAC capital improvement plan to the legislature; and 7. That the state legislative deadline for receipt of the MAC capital improvement plan be extended to at least June 30, 1991, in order to provide sufficient time to complete this process. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17th day of July, 1990. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Jim Danielson, Public Works Dir c r SUBJECT: Water System Study DISCUSSION• Mendota Height's water distribution system was last analyzed in 1972 by Bettenburg, Townsend, Solte and Comb. The accepted way to anal�ze systems at the time was by the Hazen/Williams formula with all the calculations done by hand and the results shown on a map. Today the accepted way for water distribution studies to be done is by computer model using the Kentucky Pipe Flow Model. As far as we know the City's water system is currently working fine with adec�uate pressure and flow throughout the City, with two except.ions; one is a high point along Beebe Avenue that has low pressure affecting several homes and two, the water tank gets "sucked dry" during periods when there is heavy lawn sprinkling. 5 Staff budgeted $10,000 in 1990 in order to hire a consultant to.assist us in establishing a computer model to analyze our system. The results of this study should tell us if there are any problems within the system that we don't know about, and help us determine if there is anything that can be done to prevent the water tower from being depleted. Staff prepare a system for has received the attached proposal from HNTB to computer model of the City's water distribution $6,900. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that HNTB be hired to pre�are a Kentucky Pipe Flow Model for the City's water distribution system. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council-desires to implement the staff recommendation they should pass a motion awarding a contract to HNTB authorizing them to prepare a Kentucky Pipe Flow Model for Mendota Height's water distribution system. This study to be completed according to this attached proposal dated June 21, 1990 with a"not to exceed" figure of $6,900. All costs for this work to be funded out of the Utility Enterprise Fund. NTB June 21, 1990 HOWARO NEEOLES TAMMEN S. BERGENDOFF ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS Mr. James E. Danielson, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria C�irve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 Re: Proposal for Kentucky Pipe Flow Model of Water Distribution System Dear Jim, � � 6700 France Auenue South Suite 260 Minneapo!'u, �lrnnesota 55435 (G12) 9204GGG Thank you very much for the time you and Clayton Eckles recently spent in our office discussing the Kentucky Pipe Flow Model. We hope you both found the visit interesting and worthwhile. As we discussed, HNTB is very interested in preparing a model of your municipal water distribution system. Our proposal consists of the tasks as described below: MODEL FORMULATION AND CALIBRATTON We propose to utilize the state-of-the-art computer model known as the Kentucky Pipe Flow Model (KYPIPE). Data such as pipe lengths, diameters, age and materials; storage reservoir sizes, sites and elevation; pressure regulator locations; topography; speci�c elevations; interconnections with other systems; city water usage; and overall system layout will be utilized to develop a customized computer model for the City. In order to ensure that the model is properiy calibrated, HNTB, in coordination with the City, will conduct field testing at fire hydrants to verify water pressure and flow conditions at numerous points throughout the distribution system. The testing will involve monitoring pressures at selected locations at specific times when water demands are lrnown or can accurately be estimated. The results of the field tests will be compared with the computer model developed. The input data will be modi�ed and fine-tuned until the computer model output closely approximates observed �indings from the field testing program. HNTB understands that Mendota Heights purchases finished water supplied by the St. Paul Water Department. The water reaches the Mendota Heights System through 4 interconnections with the West St. Paul System. HNTB will take special care, therefore, to coordinate with the Cities of St. Paul and West St. Paul to detemune how their respective distribution systems impact the operations of the Mendota Heights system. P��Cner� Cherle9 T. Nonnfpnn PE. Oaniel J. SpiBaf PE. John L. Catton PE. Frenefe X. Mell PE. F7oCerc 5. Come PE, Donaltl A. �upiee PE. Wi�liem Lova FAIA, Raberc D. Miller PE. Jamoe L TuCGIe. Jrt PE. HuOh E. Schall PE. Cary C. Goodman AIA, Go`don H. Steney, Jr PE, Hervey K. Mammorxf, Jr PE, Scaphen G. Goddard PE. John W. WighC, Jr PE, RiChard D. Hackman PE. RicharC L. Farnen AIA, DouO�ae E. Praeeot� PE Auocl�Cs� KondeN T. Li�Cdn CPA, Robarts W. SmiGhem PE. Marry D. BarCoeea PE. Relph E. Robiean PE, Stnnloy I. Mons PE. Roba�t W. Anzia PE, Walter Sherko PE. Jemes O. Ruaeoil PE. Roae L Jenaen AIA, Frank T. Lemm PE. H. Jarome Butlar PE. Bleiea M. Cerriere PE, Mieheol P. I�ardis PE, Bernard L PNe�ee PE, Seephen B.Ouinn PE. SaW 0. Jeco6s PE. EwinO N. Miller FA10. �ugloa C. Myhre PE. Carl J. Mellee PE, Doniol F. Becker PE, Ooneltl P. Keuth PE. Ronaltl L Hertjo PE, Roberc W. Luscom6e PE, Thomae L. Wiiliama Alq Oenni9 E. Conklin PE. John E. Kupke PE. iaodney P Pello PE. Steven M. Reias A10. Floborc A. Leick PE. Glenn O. Satlubky PE, Benjemin A. Whialer PE. Roger S. Auetin PE, John D. Brothars PE. Cherloa L. O'Reilly, Jr. PE. Robarc M. Sloen PE. Oaupiea A. Boytl AIA. Rnymond J. MCCOCo PE, Thome6 A. Skinnar PE. Peui A. Yarocni PE OTflaa� Alaxondria. VA, Atlanta. GA. Beton Rouge. LA. Boaton. MA, Charleaton. WV, ChiCego, IL. ClOvelond. �H. Caneortl. CA. Dellna, TX, Oenver, CO. Fairfieltl. NJ. Hartfortl. CT, HouaCan. TX, Indienapalie. IN, Irvine. CA. Kaneas Ciq. MO. Louisville. KY, laxington, MA, I.oe AnBalee. CA, Miomi, FL. Mllwoukee. WI. Minneaoalie. MN, Now Y�rk, NY Clrl�n'1� Ft., ['�var�nnA PwrY K."+ Phi�wNnln�+in Pq Ph�nniv q7 [iwtn�nh Nf: .^�nnr�in Wn Tmm�n FI T� �ian f1K W�Im�nnrnn I'lF � �� Mr. James E. Danielson, P.E. June 21, 1990 Page 2 SYSTEM EVALUATION Using the calibrated model, HNTB will evaluate the system under average day, peak, and maximum day; during a fire far the eurrent year, #he year 20�(} and the year 2020. During this Task, meetings will be held with City personnel to determine runs to be made, to select fzre areas and incidents when pipelines are aut of service and other general system constraints. Approxirnately 20 to 25 runs will be made dwring tl�is phase. (Ma�cimum day and fi.re canditions wili have several runs due to alternative fire Iocations.} Based upon the computer printouts, a sumrnary tabulation of all reaches of pipe that have velocity and/or pressure deficiencies will be prepared, System deficiencies and requirements along with reservoir storage needs will be identi�ed for both the developed and undeveloped areas of the City. Particular care vcr'ill be taken to evaluate the system in the area of the e�cisting storage reservoir with a number of passible additional mains included. Any other areas of speci�ic interest will be identiiied through meetings between City and HNTB personnei. �•. HNTB will evaluate the storage capability related to e�cisting/projected demand of the Mendota Heights distribution system. If additianal water s�orage capacity is needed, the KYPIl'E Model will be utilized to help size, locate and evaluate the mast e£f'icient �ocaiions for additional storage capacity. CONCLUSIONS, RECOM[MENDATIONS AND 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN � Information obtained from all previausly completed efforts will be analyzed. Alternative methads ta optimize aperations and imprave the system will be deveioped. Alternatives will be developed, taking into consideration the potential impacts to the system due to deveioped areas near I-494. Computer verificatian runs will be performed ta support alternative solutions. Cost estimates, a comparison matrix, and a 5-year Capital Improvement Program will be developed. Throughout this phase, HI�FTB personnel will have discussions with City personnel to ensure a praject that will meet the needs af the City. . - A final report uriil be prepared which will campile informatian from ihe previousiy descnbed tasks and will summarize the recommendations for system irnprovements and the capital improvement pragram. REV'IEW PROCESS HI�tTB will meet with City personnei several times throughout the study at scheduled progress review meetings. In additiar�, HNTB will prepare a draft report for City review and comment. Formal progress review meetings and the scheduie for completion of #he draft report is included in our project schedule, FA . � Mr. James E. Danielsou, P.E. June 21, 1990 Page 3 If requested, �II�iT'B uriil assist Ciiy personnei in presenting this report to the City Utilities Commission and, the City Council. �iNTB will prepare appropriate graphics ta suppart this presentatian. HNTB will provide Mendota Heights capies of all computer disks and a basic user manual describing the use of the distribution system computer madel. HNTB will provide appropriate training and instruction for City Pers�nnel so they can maintain and update the system madel so that future eacpansion project scenarios can be evaluated. sez�cEDu�,E � HNTB will submit the KYPIPE Model and a draft af the 5-year Capitai Improvement Plan to the City for review and comment within 8 weeks from Notice-to-Proceed. HNTB will furnish the City 10 copies af the approved 5 year Capital Improvement Plan within 10 days after review and comment by the City of Mendota Heights. PRfJJECT FEE HNTB will complete the KYPIPE Distribution System Madel and assaciated 5-year Capital Improvement Plan for the City of Mendota Heights for a maximum fee of $b,900. Direct salary costs will be multiplied by a factor of 2.8 and will be invoiced to the City up to the estimated project ma�mum fee. The 2.8 multiplier includes all iabor, overhead and profii costs. HNTB direct expenses will be invoiced to the City at cast and are included in our preceding estianate. Please note ihat our estimated project fee includes a charge of $S00 that HNTB must pay to acquire the KYPTPE software package that will be tumed aver to the City upon project completion. Our proposed fee also includes 8 haurs of HI�tTB time for City in-house personnel training and instruction so City personnel can learn to use, maintain and update the system model, thereby enablzng evaluation of future system e�ansion„ improvement and replacement scenarios, HNTB is very excited about the possibility of assisting you complete this project. Please call Brian LeMon, Tom Roushar or me if you have any questions. Thank you again for visiting with us and for cansidering HNTB. Very truly yours, HOWAR � LES TAMMEN & BERGENDCIFF ��-�-� �f,'� �' ale A. Tranter DATjdhs 0140/Mendota.Hts CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 9, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works ire SUBJECT: Purchase of SOS convenience Mart Property DISCUSSION• In conjunction with the Duffy/Curley proposal to redevelop the SE corner of Lexington and TH110 into a strip mall, staff had negotiated an acceptable purchase agreement with the owners of SOS Convenience Mart. The owners of the Convenience Mart have been attending the public meetings leading up to the agreement and were aware of the City's desire to purchase their site even before the negotiations began. Because of the City's desire to purcliase their property they have not made any improvements to their property since learning of the impending acquisition. They are agreeable to the City's terms for purchase. The City Council had approved a Developers Agreement with Mr. Duffy and the Curleys that established the terms under which the City would grant the needed permits and participate with TIF money to assist their project. Mr. Duffy has been satisfied with that agreement, however the Curleys have not been and are currently working with staff in anticipation of returning to the City Council with some amended terms. The process with Duffy and the Curleys has been a lengthy one with no real end yet in sight. The owners of SOS feel as though they have been kept in limbo for a long time waiting for this project to go forward and would very much like the City to acquire their site now. If we do not acquire the property soon they will be forced to make a large investment for removal and replacement of their motor fuel tanks (see attached letter of request). Staff feels that it is the goal of the TIF District and the City's "to clean this corner up" by acquisition of the SOS Mart and the Curley Furniture store and to redevelop it into a higher better use. We feel that the redevelopment at this corner is inevitable and will occur. It will facilitate faster action on a new development if the SOS site is acquired and removed as soon as possible. RECOMMENDATION- Acquisition and removal of the 50S Convenience store is a goal of the TIF district, there are currently adequate funds available within the District for acquisition of the site, staff recommends that we grant SOS's request and proceed with acquisition at this time. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should direct staff to take the action needed to proceed with the acquisition. ,. l =- ,. . _ .. LARRYS.SEVERSON• JAMES F. SHELDON J. PATRICK WTLCOX' TERENCE P. DURHIN MICHAEL G. DOUGHERTY MICHAEL E. MOLENDA•' PAUL J. STIER •ALSO LICENSED IN IOWA ••ALSO LICENSED IN WISCONSIN •••AI.SO LICENSED IN NEBRASKA Juzy 3, 1990 SEVERSON, WILCOX & SHELDON, P.A. A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 600 MIDWAY NATIONAL BANK BUII�DING 7300 WEST 147TH STREET APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA b5124 (672) 432-3136 Tom Lawell � City Administr.ator� - � : �� , City of Mendata Heights �:. , .: , . 1101 Vict.or.ia• Curve - � ' ' ; � ;:: : � Mendota _ Heights � Mirtnesota TELEFAX NUMBER 432-3780 ;.: , . 55�.18 � . �-. �� a° � �� -�� • KENNETH R. HALL •• , - ' •'•SCQTf D. JOHNSTaN " - • ' , . ' `'.� - JOSEPHP. EARLEY .. � , - � . � : `� r = � � LOREN M. SOLFEST � ... ^ . ' CHRISTINE M. SC01'ILIA .. . � � - � ' ANNETPE M. MARGARIT • � � DATTIEL M. SHERIDAN : OFCOUNSEL: JOFIN E. WKELICH :.�:: :. � � - . , : <: � ' . -• .. . . , .. - � _ . �. . . .. -_ - ,�:.� = ; . -, . ;,. ; : _ ' _- . . ., . ' � ., '.f' _ , : _ . - . _�`� - _�`yt=� '�:. ' .'' ;, . _ . ;' _ s,:«. �;�-�: `"%' . r":,f As F,� � � n :.�. ��i.l'�: ,'�.�,,�.,,.�,��r �c�...,Y`:�L� �� .. ��•tV� ..� ^.�-.`.' fi.-.'Y.'` i'r.T4.-7'-�?f � #,•,� . �• _ : ' � RE : Purchase : af SOS �onvenient Mart� prop�rtg� "°��: � �•�:r:= }- - a.- �4:;,., F.r�-",-,-_ s,:. •�- •�� _ `,,ry r.�;_„.; � "2a U ro 1.� .M^} ^: =y�:; r�i.: : . Our File No. 15 - - - . � �.' �,:,, �� '- -. -,_ :a.' �.: .� ��' - .. . . , 18 775�9. -:� .. ,.:. .:�;�. "a`.;• ;�,.-��.,�::,� �;;;.��. '��. ;k;-:��.�;. . . t, -. . , . � -_ - .. . - .-. � ..- - _ , - _ . „j�'_t'�. • ' � Dear Tom: �` - `�, . -. . : . , - .. .. �;._ ,: ; > t•' . � - "� ��'.:�;� - � . , . , . ,. - ' , - � � � � , � , .. :;' ' � _ � �,,': - I am . writin ,at :��hi's: time �.in -.regard to ;: the :. ra ^.bsedX�, urc � �{ ,� '� �.' ^ � �� t.� '� .�� 7tJ+,� :VYtiiY�?'� .� : r� g- ,: P P. .. z P. h�se �♦.a.f.��SaS :r;�_�.. *'�`•:'': .. . i t en.t Mart_` by=;;the � City , af = M ` �,�:.r3.� i`, i,� .4yE; •h'�. f''4i;'F`��:- �,.,.,� ._.:��:: �:;,-�u �r;'. - Conveni ; �� ?,;��; � �r •� . . . endcita �� Heigl7ts.: : L, �r�.�: ;�-:��f� :., , �;:;i A,�,.��•,3:.;: �4 :�,��:�-�-�. :�,;:�;. =,s� As you may recall, this item was. an th� agenda� las.t� fall but �� - .- .. thereaf terwards was put on the ba.ck. burner due :to ' delays b�r • the -'. ;.G :. ="� �='� .,--' developer•. ' - � . • . . ,. � • , , � , • � ., - . � - . - ' � Our client� -.,the,_owner�-of �the.� ro ert T�=has:`� � ; ��= � 3-- � .- ,'�g. ��- , , ="7�'T'',f`�: -�-`F;., t� . ,. .: _ °P P Y.r asked,�us tQ�.ad�r�se:,. ��,�_;,;�..,�,:: `��;<��,�. _ that the - ,.� ��'�� . `�� . 4 r EPA-,.deadline � far.: tank, repla�ement�� i� ; d � -; r'r x'�:: t. .', 3 , raw'ing�."n�ar:: ancl=--that�,-��,�:•__-.F,,� .::�.;.. '- the cost� of.• farty. to'� sixty � thousand° do.l.lars.�°�zould`-be"°pas�s:e.d.'��ori''�to'�`"T��-``��r'Y" �� the City in the event that the City,waits to purchas� the: property� , after .the �tanks� have, been rep�.aced. Due ta these circumstanees; we`> �. �_� .::.,�-. ..�. -=.. wot�ld recommend that�the purchase be c.onsummated.as soon �s possible. • If you are in .agr.ee�anent - wi.th this:, praposal, we wo.uld� appr�cia��. �' i`� .� d� 1+�'- �:; �; :::�-a ,..:,. ; • � your re�ommendati.an of. t�te same to ,the •Ci�y _Cauncil. ,�::�>��:�� ,=.�:>wi;�',�; _`�:�`. �. , .,. _- . ' . . -• - . � � , � . .. . , � . . ..� , . . L It is --m� understanding .that the Gi.ty � Council will;� be � meet �� „` riext r� :h-..�•�' �;�:.-� ��'"'' .;:•..� �:•'"�;;."t-., _.. �..rig�� . . , . �- . -: � Tuesda , It � would : b�e;' mos. PtF�� lie� laced =� �-•=� "i9�� Y-' : t:� a ree.iat�d �'if :,this:' i.tein`: could.� p '.;. �°4=:'��:.� �- ,. . on the Council's . agenda :�for. 16LeSdH. � `•y.. `p� �.. �.�t � . '' � .... .if' ��•�•yt Y�' • Y�<e _ cu.S:: °.. . y• s meeting. �:,• �w, ,Y.: , ,.��„�.,:,�,.. ;,.� :,�;: - Should you=�have �"any,. qu�stions� iri regard to°` this,= matter�;= ple:ase � fe�l �':'';':��:�='x`` '� �'_��_-. ; , . ,.r � �' free, to conta�t�S.e:Qtt-3o�.nston of�our.-�office ar`-the'�unde�rsign�c�.:� , ��<< ' _ � '��, � � Your ca'� �, •"�, �:_ -. . ,. ,• � * . ' _, . - -;�� :<x•:�.;.;;� '.:_�;. ;_ �',��..�~ ., urtes �and'�cooperation �is; mos.t.. appreciatec�: . ` �� `�""°� � '-:'^"'`''� .��•._ :. ,,. _ . S' .�4' y • < < w;,4'�ri � � �•`{r'� i ..!t <�i.'I- �aS � X � ' - iX 't.-: ' . . .i " - '�Y; 's.st;y''; y,'�'.' `�r :��`��:�'� i��. , •: Best Per ona �ard� .:�. .;�.°�:; ;j`�' 't.,�' .>: � _r�,^�}: � ��,...�:.r°',��°�: i ♦ - . .�,;x.� ra,. �'ji�;� ��.,..�;;ls::`: :f„ay�"�(;;..i•,. - `,�,:..�:�t ,y'. .i �� ..S'� .,�'t-°'-• +s" ,�'^p._ � :,�� .� ;�`,-;,t � � , - - �.a,',g, ��:1�� _ . .�y `4�`�'`�. .,3.r;..�F.r.i:,+ r'��: � . r ' _ _� 'a.. •y �' .. . :c'�'. " ' _ - _ ;;•ti �. Z'; . _ ``� . i , . r,7. , . •� . _, . . '�`'.;v. �t.?:`�:," . _'�'S.. _ • .�rc,. '-ti`'_ " ,c:' :.,+r � �' :. t ' , ' . ' .. „ ' ' ' . f . .. n � _ . •?�• `N:. ,r'• _ _ .. -' :_ ichael. G. Dou r , . .. .. _ .- ,�".. : . • ••- _ -.�,:k,- , �-- - • . , ;� ., - ° '.:•=: ' GD/mlj . - •�. . . .' , ' _ . . 1 ,. -. ,. � cc : Richard Ra a; t' � �' � . ` �: , - < . , : : _ � } ••. . � - • -..�- � _ " . . CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 13, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator �_ •- FROM: Guy Kullander, Parks Proje�t Manager SUBJECT: Comfort Station Bids for Sibley Active Play Facility Job 8920-K Imp. 89 � Project 6K - Bids were received and opened for the above project at 10:00 A.M. today. The base bid was for construction of a 400 square foot block building with wood truss' and shingle roof. The structure contained two bathrooms, a small mechanical room, a storage area and a concession area. In addition, we asked for three alternate bids. Alternate one was for exterior brick, alternate two for granite facing block and alternate three for underground electric service to the batting cage and all three ball field players benches. Alternate three was considered�by staff and School District 197 to be a necessary component in the development of the play field complex. Kodet Architectural Group, who prepared the plans and specifications, estimated the construction costs to be in the $50,000 range. As you can see by the attached bid tabulation, our low base bid was for $68,000 which was 35 percent over our budget. I recommend that the Council reject all bids and allow staff to reevaluate the design and bidding options with Kodet Architectural Group and the Park and Recreation Commission. Following this meeting, a recommendation or possible options will be presented to Council for review. GK:kkb � `� � ? cr.�..w...., �. � �� SIBLEY ATHLETIC FIELDS COMFORT BUILDING � �uiy �s, 1990 � City of Mendota Heights i ': i BID TABULATION � ALTERNATE ALTERNATE ALTERNATE ADDENDUM CALENDER CONTRACTOR BASE BID #1 #2 #3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DAYS Donahue onsUuc�on 0 0 oaa Gao S ao � ? ,� Met- on Metro, Inc. � 9ao 3sa o �800 �.�-?6 � �o Dahn Builders, Inc. C� a-o p8- L� d'Do s�d0 . v lvZ-� Morcon onstruction Z/ s"oo S�{va /3 �ao (e0 � 9v Parkos onstructlon o., Inc. ' 7/ 80 0 .� d / o0 o s � po Kent W. Jefferson onstruction, Inc. � �� ao s a 9dwa�� Meisinger nstruction o. �8 00 �i o ! .�.70 �'�o ✓ G o Nordling onstruction Langer onstrucbon — G omo �'� o Goo � �o . . Field o. ; 7a ?a c� GS�o !� ,Sov � 9sv �/ - 7,5� Engco Construction o., Inc. " • _ Mendota Hgls. Cost II A B C D E F G H 1 Mendota Hei hts 05.08.90 2 3 Cost Anal sis for Mendota Hei hts Sible Athletic Fields Comfort 4 Buildin Based on Floor Plan Dated Ma 8 1990 5 6 7 Or inal Added durin To Get to g Estimate C.D. $50 000* 9 10 Excavation • " $2 475.00 $2 475.00 11 Concrete: Footin s and Slabs $3 474.00 $1 000.00 $3 474.00 12 Mason : Concrete Block Rock Faced Exterior $6160.00 $1000.00 $7 00.00 13 Steel: Beams $3 20.00 $0.00 14 Rou h C n: Sheathin Soffit Trusses $4 978.00 $1900.00 $3 500.00 15 Finish C n: Sidin Fascia Cabinets $1596.00 $1200.OU $2000.00 16 Roofin : halt Shin les $875.00 $875.00 17 Sealants $400.00 $400.00 18 Doors: Hollow Metal Doors & Frames Rollin Door Hardware $5 460.00 $5 460.00 19 G sum Boazd: Ceilin $396.00 $396.00 20 Tile: CeramicTile u Tile $1712.00 $1712.00 21 Paintin $1642.00 $1400.00 2 2 Miscellaneous: Fire Exitin Bath Accessories, Toilet 2 3 Partitions, Si na e $1400.00 $1400.00 24 Mechanical: Plumbin $3 720.00 $9 000.00 $12 000.00 2 5 HVAC $1200.00 $1200.00 2 6 Electrical $2 900.00 $3 000.00 $2100.00 27 2 8 Total $40 408.00 $45 592.00 2 9 5% Contin enc $2 021.00 $2 021.00 3 0 18% Overhead & Profit $7 274.00 $7 274.00 31 � 3 2 Total $49 703.00 $18,300.00 $54 887.00 3 3 Ad'usted Total $68,003.00 34 35 3 6 * Remove overhand of 655 S. Ft. a roximatel 1/2 of normal . f� cost. 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 4 7 This robable cost summ is reflective of the lrnowled e available on this ro'ect as of this date. 4 8 Market conditions ro chan es biddin condidons and other market lace factors can and will affect 4 9 this summ . The summ is rovided to determine and a roximate sco of ro'ect. Page 1 :t CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 17, 1990 To: Mayor, City Council and City Admini�� From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assista t��.i3 Subject: Selection of Part Time Custodian for Public Works and Fire Hall Buildings DISCIISSION At the April 3, 1990 City Council meeting, the Council directed staff to advertise for and recruit a part time custodian to service the Public Works garage and the City Fire Hall. The position was advertised as a twelve (12) hour a week job with the hours to be split evenly between Public Works and the Fire Department. The purpose of the new position would be to perform routine custodial duties at the two facilities. (See attached job description.) Staff advertised in the local papers in late April and early May for the position and received ten (10)' applications for the position by the closing date of June 14, 1990. The field of candidates was narrowed to five finalists for interviews based on custodial experience and knowledge. The interviews were conducted on July 11, 1990 at the Fire Hall. The interview panel, composed of Tom Olund, Public Works Superintendant, Bill Lerbs, Assistant Fire Chief and Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant, unanimously agreed that Ed Vaillancourt, Jr. was the most promising candidate. Mr. Vaillancourt has custodial experience from his previous employment at Knox Lumber and currently works part time for UPS in Eagan. Mr. Vaillancourt demonstrated a strong desire and aptitude for our position as well as the willingness and ability to perform. Contingent on City Council approval, Mr. Vaillancourt agreed to accept the position. Staff has still not completed routine background check or the pre-employment physical recommends that any approval be contingent on acceptable result these two selection criteria. ACTION•REOIIIRED has the and s of If the Council desires to accept the staff's recruitment of Edward Vaillancourt, Jr. for the position of part time Custodian, they should pass a motion to appoint Edward Vaillancourt, Jr. to the position of part time Custodian contingent on satisfactory completion of the routine background check and pre-employment physical. �• � r :. •� -, Position Title: D�partment: Accountable Ta: Pay Grade: May 24, 1990 POSITION DESCRIPTION Building Custodian - Part Time Pub7.ic Works/ Fire Public Works Director%Fire Chief Parimary Ob-iective of Position: Ta perform rautine custodia2 duties far the public warks garage and fire station facilities, Duties and Responsib3.lities Maintain appearance and cleanliness of bua.lding interiors through rautine and periodi.c custadial duties. Caliect and dispose of trash. � Res�.ock a11. paper goods and monitor supplies. Perform other duties and assumes other custoda.aZ responsibilities as assigned. Knowledge and Skills Required Ability to organize and maintain a routine cleaning and maintenance schedule iar two City facilities. Abil.ity to make independent decisions based on established rules and pracedures. Ability ta establish and maintain an effeative working relationship with ather employees. Minimum Traininct Experience and Familiarity with Janitorial Equipment and the Use and Routine Maintenance af Such Equipinent. .. : . . . . � lty� .. O� �� : _,' � +::� �'1.,�; c�: _ r-- ��.�.. ...��.� .. � 1V�endota=:�Her .... ��4:::a_ 1V g�hts��-� .., - . ._ :�: �._.. .. • �� ,� Personnel Departrnent, 7107 �cforia Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55718 � : APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT � �..{.. . . . . . . . _ :E:- . We welcome your applicatioa for employment It willbe considered with others for the posifion you specify. Our policy is to provide equal opportunity in employment,.and to prolu'bit discrimiaation on the basis of race, color, sex, creed; celigxon, nafional origin, age, marital status, disability, political affliation, or status with regard to public assistance. This policy applies to full-time, part-time; and ' • - ✓�i. .. :`,•: 'i;.d'_� �'-:' M1' f-�;, - seasonal�and temporary employment � _ ... . : �. - � •::"`::� .: : � -. Please furnish us with complete information. Your opportunity for employment may be reduced if your�application is'iacomplete. We encourage you to attach any additional information which you believe qualifies you for the position. Any materials submitted in sdpport of an applicafioa are not normally returned. Do not submit an original document if it is your only copy. Applications�must be received by the application'deadline or must be postmarked at least one day preceding the deadline. LATE APPI.ICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. �- � ' ' ` " _. - - .i:� ' �� . � PLEASE PRINT IN INg OR USE A TYPEWRITER ~ . -. = �=. "";` ' , . . . �„�,., . - . .. ... . • . . . . .._....... ..._ ....... . - - -: =.:i', _. - PERSONAL INFORMATION � � -. ;; .-_ � � � . , � : .: �"',"-�'`•``,;_°'".. ��s�� :: : j:�-.�..:,:,,;:..:�.:..�;;. �. . . • ` ,I '.. 'T� ' ' ' �c 3.+"1>:>' t_��s�.'•^ _��. \. s . _ . :. .'.�:'.ti, ' � �. i , � �di��::•'=�y�,,�,.F� r.... ''..:_'_ .'- '�;�-� ::rt a�•.� . . �� . - .. � .:.'' . ' : S. i' ';i^i&yr�r'.,�x-k�y'�� 'r,�., �--^. _ra��^ U�u�l�-��r�f� .1--R, F��„�( ' ' �J� SOcrai.SEcuRrrYriuMBER �'��-'��-"5ll �'� . . Last First . • Middle , . . - > - : ��;.,�: � _... .. � . .. . . . . . . .. . - '..r.. . ' annx�ss ��-�j � 1�!�- ��. .U. So4f� sf lp�.� � n'1��1 �s'mr' � screec . �iry , • � sraco Zip coae HOME PHONE.�IUMBER. K�S'� - l� �i �� '"f�+5 - OTHER (DAYTIME) PHONE NUMBER .. . . �• ;� ::�"�:; �'': �= .. � .. . ... ... . . - . . ' . . � . i f • �' . ., ��-ryC ' l. � �. .l . ' . . .. � .. . . - � . e::t� C.•��'x�R�.�~• � / �� ,� ` . � May we contact you at work? ❑ Yes � No Are you over age 18? � Yes ❑ No ,� If position involves driving, indicate Driver's License Number: State: Class: � .. . ,':��,..,-..�;. . . :' � . ' . . ' , � :.- - .., . � , EMPIAYMENT DESIRED . � � � - , - - - `� � ,_: -:. . ,., .. . �,,.4.; . . . � � : � : c_.. �i't-c.;;�c..j:'`�.'YE'S.s�,L''y6S;.5,i:�..-y. . . , t.. " ... - ' . - ` _ . . .:} , _ _ : { �.,r._ % r:.^<:i,' .�s.'yY�' �' . - • • - .; e- 1��5�,.�:.,. ' -`'.a•' _ i_ .. _ '.:..::.:;, : �.a; r+l; . ' ' -. -. '_'itr. - . • ' � ' . - ' . -;ei;`;�:?.=y:.•J+.'. ��'�.Type of employment �desired: - . . � Fnll T'ime`"` , ,� Part T'ime _ � .. ❑ �Temporary/Seasonal�'�'�` ,�;:`>' `'•- � ��;�°' ; �:..•., r�•�,=� .;:�.:�,:.•,' �..,,• , - „_ 'ri� - . . _ , . . , . .,. - . . _ ,°- :f��i'�''"``: .:ls0:i�.�f : -_ y'-J`� . . .,• . . ' • . . �. ....... ., .- :tTi:., z:?.�1"�. =4=. . .. t S desir'� _� �� `-,Ar .��` =� - � Date Available: : �. ��' � . � �• -Are ou em lo ed now? •'... . . YesJ,;�: ; No . � � -� _ rr r�:� ;,.. Y P Y ��.. � ,.� . .; � . - . . ,.... .:.�. - ,�;...... _ .. . . . . . _ _ ..<... ._ ._. . _,:�.�. �� _,.:... ; . ... . . . _ -.--� ....,«. , ._ , .�. a� . _ �.fy :;�� . ,. • - � ;�`�t�x.''ti„��s. , ��a., ..,r. - ;sT, , _ . . . . _ =.T - : s� x• . , , . . . . . 'r� , t> 'ti;3;.xu. ,: �,,:. . , . .: � r �,: . , ;, ;; ` ,:: , , . . . � ..� i . , �, • . y. , •. -• ' :, . _. :.6�sr;..�..>.v..l,s `•`�,i May we contactyour present employer? � Yes Q � No If NO; explain • -_ : ._.� �. .: .. ` ...�. �. �. __ � a.�:;;.n��;,>,:.::,;�:;o.�:- -� -_ ' "' ':�.,'- � � '.f:C��i .:l,a. ' • ..Z`'L.•i'{� . ri :!' - . . . ' �L�'9 � : ��a�t�� o:-�<, ` _ • . . ai�' t ... ' .- . . . _ ." . � ' '. � ::. ' ry s ,- • " ``+'^� kY�..:�a::.: " ...i � .. . ' .' . ' _ -- " • .' ' - - - . , :_:: .Y.Yt: �..; '�: . i;�; ., � • _,+. • . . . . .. • . -. . . , .. ` . .r • „r..-:;,.�-'' a•,"-`�'`.ys1.��••'' , ...... -s_..r :. �. ::s.�-� :.:�. . . ; -, a - -� - . . ::x=.--..: _,.,.�.. 1s-Have you been previously employed by the City of Mendota Heights? Yes . �` No _ _:�;:�,;,�<<T;.: ��r:�� . �\Yyi .�� r4Ni��•r:.iy"> �� :.Y't�Zj i� �. .. _ � . _ . . �. . .� ♦ ,� . � - _.. i=: -+��6Z✓� Et.� al,,.�i.�y `M: - :-4: i- . �J.. . d\a =. � . • � ' _ .. - - . . . : - �?+ ��" eF. '`'3;'`'_ `� .��.a.-':� _ .. C�{. �' ... . .. . . � . . � ., _ ... . 1�•;' _ •�:.1'.._.. . :;J��;'i.;+�i�' :- ��,y};Z V, '2'�y�: �_iV...:..., :' � ^ POJaLLOII(S,� ... _ . . � , . _ •.l:. . . 'r.�;� � • . . . . . . . . _ .. .. � . . .. • }�}�`' :�.i, . _ - _ . :t. :...�•_ .. ..... . ... .. _ '��Y...�•-. ._.._..... :�:_ z_. . . ....3.... . . z:,�:....ia;.;:rs.;:sa•s:+'.,Z,�'jfj�i�',�"_«.R,��Ct. EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION . , �, . • �. . . � . Circle the highest grade completed: ' • . � Grade School �== - � • ' . ' . High School ' " " 12345678� "9101112orGED Did you graduate from H'igh School? � yes � No e r - � . • ". .r',%'ny�:,.l��:f%.N^.. _ ^„�4`-.�''` ;'� • . `�; }s .i iin`f.3i.•i�, .� . . -:� ` _ .. �� , _ _.:;:� . �: . �� s .. _. . . . • • � _ . .. . ti., 4 y,a.;.,, .' , . �, Colle e � . Post-Graduate • __ .=,.::.:.:,.. , . 13�15 16 . �.-MA MS PHD LIB.� ;° , Name of School: �o�.f�i �/�- ��.c�L ' ' • . Name and location�ot'coll universi • Couzse of # of � - � '� Did ou �=� �.' � � D '�-'" �e, ty� 3"ears -. Y ��„'':,-', . �: : technical/vocatioaal/business schools' � � study ' : . , : ��attended "• '.. -:; graduate? . � �'=�� eceived. :� � t d.� � � � F � ' � ;a : . �'� . .� � oGr � ._. - - � ' :. . . " . . ' . ' � - . _ • . : t�,«�: . .. _. .. , , � � � . ., �.� �. . ,-. . . .. , � List�any relevant certificates; awards, conespoadence courses,�special coiuses, or.special training you have taken � +:"�- �"�'�� .. ;,. ��- •" ,>�,:» . . . . , .. �ey'. ��..7i.';�'i: �3-; i' , • 'x''�"'� ;;�;; �;i'. . s,� , x._. �;„ .:,,j:� �a::�Er .��" � . - :::s?r<:%=� #S' - - �:.t':_ : t;,�: • ';��F, as , , <:,rv.�� cs:. - ' ' "''`.< �;iaC' . . . - S.!.�Ti':�':r. �::G: i�f' .i. • . . - .J.'.::J•�`� :='�.r`.� �P ' . �•.'.r`.. ' � �� , =.n,y, . xx,s... .;��. 'Y: �s�;.d�' `)ra ' _ : r ;C � %: `5.+�•� ,�• , , _ ^.;{tii.�a ..1.�`�'x''_-';,.._,L.'L''-:f. -. �. ,:�:i� .;n.5- .:?p.�.CC r.... ...s.';�;y �,�rn:5:�� d... y�.. ;.v, . . .., .'r . Y'. `.;R. e . �n�.�.r�::r'` . '"rF,• .?{ `:. ?2a'::,''.ii"::c., - ?J. -,'?'C<��,'%`' : r:'.-�. .•.r:...:r'•. �� :" �-�^'`+Ti'�3r- . ;rX..;.�:;.. ..�. .y:?6- • .. . . . ' _ .,s .ti:�.::��,,,�.�;3.. ��.e�.`.S. .r �s.,.o.F�,:.'�.:',F . .: To be completed by applicants forADMII�IISTRATiVE, PROFESSIONAL, FISCALand CLERICALposilions onty -��N��::.�>;": .�; . .� .. . - .;=R'?'; dtF'.' . . . ' , t , ..K ?T='s�:�,a;-..,,.��y: • f� :'��• tq,�,,� ' ,i... ..�. •. . .,... . .... : �� .: ..t:�,:: � � - :L • :�J � •`i � . ��-��-'A'T ;`k C�� :�N��Y�:.�i_�. ''}��•. ti: -. . �'P�Ability?."'.� .�Yes":_ ;�. ,No . � Words perminute • ' � "•�-�. = >`. � - ..:?.. _ : t ..= �' . • • . - -c; �,�rt�r� . . . • .,u;,�•: _ , . . _ , • _ . . • _'�:::. . - • ": .i . . ... ,r_,. Business�machine operation Jarid experience:� In addifion to listing typewriter,l0-key, dicfaphone, etc., experience, please ''" "'_'%�== �' ' include specific information regarding any computer operating experience indudiug specific sotttware prog�ams: .. , , .5., ,�� k`! .� C . . .J.; • . . . ... ' . . .. . . .F.�• . . ' To be completed by applicants for LABOR/MAIIVTENANCE and SffiI.LED TRADE POSITIONS only. �. Trades learned, apprenticeships served, current licenses/certificates held: � ' ' :��u�-y .. . . .fr-;:'�+i`•:��:4 �r4:�'s`:.'r'.>.�i'>,. . , �� '� ' r"?t!, i�kii�r`-�r:3.:. . . . . ca�:y:•. ..r..:, • _n:i... . ��t.,a:�i�y z...e• ..�.r r. � .� k:-�i,:..m;. : ... . . . . � .��:• •aw •p L,�"i�_-e . Ca �able of o ��i�' the.fo�lo 'ui �meat ., ' . . ��r�=�«� =��.�<�r:;'or��:.�::' ;_�;�: ;`>::". ti�. .. .. . �T;:�<;;.�:.�:;;:;.;:� P Pe � .�� P . . . :•�r� .. . {:>:;;:_.�;. .�,�� .; - • . . . . .t� . '•' '`._�4� _ -ni�i�'�!'�v2:.'t�:��i:i�it�):, r . , - .. . .. •� _ [••t,,,ii`!}'n.f. ...• � - � - � , , ,1::111fi': �S''�i�v:'.Y-• i _ . .. � . ♦ .. - n b�.� ...." . _ . � � r'r•�.: y;�. :�as±u ftfY�T.tr� • �.z: . . . . . . , _ . . _ _ y,�z�� i�t� Y,� '. �iYt , • :r+ic?"�r':�� _ . <rY .. '.:�� _ � _ __.:��`ef!,y:y .i"yJ�"`'e�i".1• •�i��'.•S��.r� •j ' � ��F�s�i:,.t.: . _ :' . • .. •. ._. .� �YS:.+•..�.<_'�'. .] � ��'I:' � V..� . , .. �.'n Fn.t"':�. . � . .f��j e �.•3t'L w� :.'?y, '�• yi . I . .. " r:i:.ir;'s:r'�~'r .;_�h�:i`1::�:�+ti'� _ . . .. . '�+;•__.,.q`.:`y, . , .. , - . • - _ - . �.:+-N . i..: ,r :, �- v.•..,. ai:.; ::i.;. f " • , . �i�•.4:"d�,$:1%yc,w:<j.:��IJWF!•y:�Rw=`itiT.L•' . . • . . .... . .. ccY:... �:J�:.-:• _ � � •• _. � ' .. :�'�' � • , JOB RELEVANT� VOLUNTEER OR UNPAID WORK EXPERIENCE {";:� ." - , _ " " ' � � � � � ' M �MPLt3YNiENT NiSTORY ' ' •:r=��:. ==i.�5�. ,��:�;:��:��--a;:;�::�:��.. j�°iease give accurate, complete employment information. List your present ar most recent experience FIRST. Attach �additional' heets if necessar�: Even if yau have attached a resume, you must complete this sectian. �-� � ...,. .� . Employer's naxne Vlit�� ,�� c'v 1 ��u�vi c�- Address �j �'.�,,. � . �q,K�.�. � - Phone number ��-�'GO � �_r5'o�,�e ��p�ivisor �� -E�_— Yoeu�title�ai"�1�,r�'- �� Sugervisor'sT'itle�"r,,�/1 S�,s�-'�rviro+� Principal responsi'bilities (be complete) ` - .�o r. t''� -5�6��O�c.lca � � T � Number & Eype af posi�ions yau supervise,d: . �clOiOx''S�IIal11C' r , .P. P Y. �; �,�yzl�r� • ` • ; Je [ ii �. • ' . .. .-° ,. i . •zL.t=rn+ �- �}r�.�aV.... ' _ ia . � . .`#:.-:'��'.��:4•r , .. A.ddress� . �.�-�'�rS'... � r: -'�'n�n . -�- �� . �i'�. �: ,. � . - . - -.�� t�:;'., , �;;" _� �'�- '�'�. phone number`'r'1�-, J:.�.-- l0 `1,. . �: . . . j� , _ . - - . . �_•�._`� •. _ ` ` , - �(_�.� $I1peIVlSOi ` C`�'�✓�iLr+G2 � Yonr title �r`•+{�e.�-4 ,�:lle,.� � Supervisor's Titte �: i�cji� 5w,�r��"f�i-�- ^�� Principat responsibilities (be complete} �; Cl � �arr� �n.�tr-S� �r�r a�r"v��r �/��P �5 .k�` - i;':!Yc+. .. 4. ' .-, . '. .... .. . . ... , • '. . , ., . .. . >. .. Y�C.=:,Yi.-_i� : �" - . a. - - �. .. , , a - , . , _ . . .. ,` � ' � _ Nuxnber & type of positions you snpervised: � �"� �' ':'�i'�',+r= :�kx Adtiress ` ,' _ �.�ri�ti �, _:.`{'i k.� �'.�% �'' Pli.ane aia `k" �,r..:��:.�� 'i'rV, i •��.�� Youur�title .,`,. . ;ik Y:�:'r�,,;�.�� ^� Princ�pat . .. _';:r•},-A�;�,:: � Length of erapIoyment � ' From �'l +� " �� month ycar.;,-_�;�j.::�,::;. To �,��'a- �t-� t, �::.r�:. . • . • . • mc�neh.=ycar ,�,�, n::x,.,{,;.,;_.'. � Total � x' �:.:�, ` : '� =� r��-rt�,: � . years months : � `- Hours per week �S = �.-."� - . '-, I.astssa"lary,�� `-��'��,`��i�T:� � . . Reason for Ieavin�,rf'�.`rl f1't�"2._ ; - - � • ... '��.. .� '.�: :�:', . .._.. � • �i5� , ' . . :--.' �:s ' "rM1'�3 .y ''.'. r{p: : +`yy'f,�ay(•��%�'"`'Yf `ro;"� Y ,t• � , •. ^� .._`_4M�'Jc ?.,.,, '�,n �ii^ y.�y%}•�S; I:e of�eai lo;rR, ��.r,�",}{"�'r.t,g ayP=�.ap • ' � .r: a •' r�i:,�: t.�..`�=J-a ^� � t` - .i �,:�.;�-'.:.� �y :�s' i�� `: ..�`y?,�f,.,},",.;ti ..;!c}. .��sy�s.,.i?t• �t :A�.".:t"M1k:v f ��.7.,� :�{+ �,{:.. �J:*w a^'�+�," ` w `..sC�f ,.i._Z . „� ^;' •, �f,v�„�-�., _- �� From � ..� _ �� ,,�. � . ; mantfi year:_:..-:. -.-. •,.a,:='; . . . � - . ;; ;;.?i.'.'.i,.c-:�',"."tF3,:i`?,�;f��.�•;ti-�•,�.: To � Lf � �C�.' ':�::�� . month �.y�ear..- • ` . Total years months H4tI2'S �F W��C J'� —� � z.� �tazy ��'<S: S"�~'`�`� " _ . Reason for leaving,�t.�f"��l"�� • � ��' � � 06 f:� 4,�-r� name �!l;er-� �t�i St�n�� ' .- . . '. ,.- I.engtti.of employme "��:{z�x�: ��,�.: :;,, :,. �• •K- - ; ,._ •:s1'st'�-1w��t,%:M,k,'.+.^.3.�F:ia,`,,',t.'i;�:t:,rr�+�.:ic:ev3.a.w�:•'.a�wi''' _�i3r��a�{-.i:•.yrr.�r..., x .. _:?r`,.':a%�^t�;��:�,2,.;�.e..: „»,a,,:,�. si;».4>ri:.:+iY;rF�:.pi:: �'��S`S`.'•;-..r„>;?t�_�1.� �,,�� ' _�'.:`•' . . ... � ', � _ � �,� ��r ° ' r ; c�= _ •-� �` � � ' From �.� }s:� ��:�;.a>:- ��r,�:: � 3,#, -;: --... .- :�; _:�s-r... - �4:"�•�� - .. ma �s.t��5Y}.'�'� +'G.: �.w� �L� �2:. :.G �:,5 �, .:l"' :t._. , . S: •' ... �p!',Yf(%� � ,y,'.�c:`' �/�() '�.�1:C .�.i�':i,��. �.{/. �:i�,s:f�: _ '3:':�: _�Y':;'.'H.�- JVT*.4. /��v /(/ �,' �/��!'4.�.Y�Ji� .l�Q��ii v.. .. � _ •-' . . . . .'G�''� � ��e.. �:r :-:�;;�v:;:�:;.�a:� �.�;.,.r.� - <�-,.�•:t... �ti±:: rv:,... ��r' .,TO` ~j. st ::t,'�t• ;f�?:r�:i.4:.>,`...Z� �:: . +l�.;ty�. ::�i:=� �-.it � . . . � ' . ..�'. -��'' j �'^"` Supei�visor's•T"'xtle::��,s:,;�:=n:';;. _ - �'��:�:�`;=;;.�;;;' : ;:.<:'"..�..:,::_. '; , m« - .:,��- = =.. : �; v.:�� . �?�';�%y,,,..,> „�r; ' :';;.: �:5 f�. »..t;-:`r�r,?;:� ' +s•i :r.:t�q.9; . < �' �:'r�;��>=��; - a:_ t:�:.. . i, . � . <'i=- "=Tatat� - :'�-_�; �i-.a. .� . .,,i, �: ; _ �. j . , t . :t..r " . _ . ;-s � . . . . _ ... "M _ .f.:. `f" ' � �!'�\`Ly �•Y�i,�Y?.. '•u�~ , �il�es lbe complete) �-�;�< .: r,� .. .,;_.� �:. �r,� , • , . .. . -<.: .. • .. . . . , years �:monu ��.�%�� -.. � � , . . 'r` . . . . - , wS �' � �'�8 �-�� . � , `c-� � 5`� c e � �.. ' - .. . : `'. . • Haurs per week �,,,.�'_;-,3 = �::i'�,�.�'ti�� ,��! '�:� � ' -- J,, � / •";::~�-^' -��' :.,� f :i� ,�^:, .. . � `:'.i `.. a . . . -' _... .. . . . . � '.i.IC1.Zt �Ql�tl +" { � 1 �:� ^t`�"..: " � .. �.'`;!i�: -` ,. . .. c` . .,. . .. ... < - ..- ; -, . :..� ., . � ;,; .�:.� �:.�,� :�,; ;-;a..�w�:: �.� _ ,_ - _ . . =z� <:�>�-, :�:�r�._ . . . ..�;;:-�<;�--;:,=�.�.�.� ;a:'a"' _ .. • Reason for leaviu� _ _ �?.� } ;;,� .;ti. :...«v,,:�� ! � g x V�� T��I'-,,,! ��c`7-�• 1 4 k� :'f t� N ., � . . : .. . . . - � . . . a . .. ° y � . ...t',• . .. �_ . �, a � ... CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLIITION NO. 90- A RESOLIITION OF APPRECIATION FOR DISTINGIIISHED SERVICE TO ELIZABETH WITT WHEREAS, Elizabeth Witt has served the•City of Mendota Heights as a City Councilmember from January 1, 1979 to September 8, 1989 and before that as a Parks and Recreation Commissioner from February 1975 to January, 1979; and _ WHEREAS, throughout her long association with the City of Mendota Heights, Elizabeth Witt's concern, compassion, foresight, representation and experience were integral to the enhancement and preservation of Mendota Heights as a quality community; and WHEREAS, Elizabeth Witt was entrusted with representing the City of Mendota Heights in local and regional governmental affairs on issues critical to the welfare of the City and represented the City in a manner deserving praise and recognition; and WHEREAS, through her enthusiasm and compassion for this community and her exemplary achievements she has attained the respect and affection of its citizens. , NOA THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that Elizabeth Witt be recognized for her enormous and positive contributions to the quality of life in the City of Mendota Heights; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Mendota Heights extend a sincere and formal appreciation for her distinguished record of service and dedication to the Community and her positive impact on the public affairs of the City of Mendota Heights; and BE IT FIIRTHER RESOLVED that Liz has earned the respect and admiration of this community through her dedicated work on the Council and Parks Commission and that the City wishes her the best in all her future endeavors. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this seventeenth day of July, 1990. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS by Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA AEIGHTS Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR DISTINGIIISHED SERVICE TO HOAARD DAHLGREN WHEREAS, Howard Dahlgren has been the City Planner for the , City of Mendota Heights since 1956; and WHEREAS, Howard Dahlgren put into place the creation, design and adoption of the City of Mendota Heights' Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance that guide and control all land use in the City of Mendota Heights; and AHEREAS, Howard's dedicated and distinguished service as City Planner has resulted in profound and positive impacts on the development of Mendota Heights as an extremely high quality community; and WHEREAS, Howard Dahlgren's influence on the positive development of the City of Mendota Heights has enabled the City to preserve and enhance the high quality of life in the community as envisioned by its leaders. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that Howard Dahlgren be extended sincere and formal appreciation for his distinguished service and dedication to the City of Mendota Heights; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Howard Dahlgren be recognized for his profound and positive influence on the development of Mendota Heights as a quality community in his capacity as City Planner; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Howard has earned the respect and admiration of the community and that the City of Mendota Heights wishes Howard Dahlgren the very best in all his future endeavors. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this seventeenth day of July, 1990. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS by Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 17, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council .- FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administrator SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for July 17th Council Meeting Attached, please find revised agenda number two. Four items have been added to the agenda (**). Additional information has been submitted for an item already scheduled on the agenda (*). 3. Agenda Adoption It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda printed on qreen paper. 4f. Approval to Refund House Movinq Escrow., ` See attached memo from Civil Engineer Klayton Eckles. 4g. Receive Petition Opposinq IItility Extension - Furlonq Addition. See attached petition. 8b. CASE NO. 90-21: Batesville Casket Companv. See attached memo from Planning Consultant Tim Malloy. 8h. Custodian Appointment. See attached memo from Administrative• Assistant Kevin Batchelder. 8i.,Resolutions Honorinq the Retirement of Howard Dahlqren and Elizabeth Witt. See attached Resolutions. 8j. Discuss Date for Council Budqet Work Session. Verbal Discussion - City Administrator Tom Lawell. MTL:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA JIILY 17, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Agenda Adoption - 4. Consent Calendar a. Acknowledgment of the June Treasurer's Report. b. Approval of Final Plat RESOLUTION NO. 90-43 and Developer's Agreement for Mendota Woods. c. RESOLUTION NO. 90-44 - Resolution Calling for Hearing on Assessment Rolls for Big Wheel Auto Site, Ivy Falls Creek � Addition, North Ivy Hills 2nd Addition and Alice Lane Subdivision. d. Approval of the List of Contractors. e. Approval of the List of Claims End of Consent b 5. Public Comments 6. Introductions a. Appointment of New Fire Personnel 7. HearinQ a. CASE NO. 90-19: Delta Environmental Consultants - ** 8:00 P.M. ** CUP - Amoco Station Accessory Structure RESOLUTION NO. 90-45 8. IInfinished and New Business a. CASE NO. 90-20: Sjoholm: CUP - RESOLUTION NO. 90-46 b. CASE NO. 90-21: Batesville Casket Company - Variance and Lot Split c. 3M Plans for Building Modifications. d. Discuss MSP Expansion Issues - Invitation to Senate Advisory Council - Resolution Regarding Collaborative Community Airport Planning RESOLUTION NO. 90-47 e. Water System Study. 9. Council Comments 10. Adjourn - 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � TREASIIRER'S REPORT, JUNE, 1990 DAROTA COUNTY STATE BANK Checking Account 5% Savings Account 5 1/2 C.D. Rep 6.6% Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. CHEROREE STATE BANK C.D. due 9/4/90 @ 7.95% Savings Cert. 8/28/90 @ 7.5% Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. BALANCE $ 16,012.82 503.94 55,000.00 71,516.72 646,000.00 100,000.00 350,000.00 13,952.59 363,952.59 600,000.00 100,000.00 U.S. Treasurey 8 5/8% 5-15-93 Notes 498,671.88 $500,000 yield 8.728% a COLLATERAL $746,000.00 $700,000.00 Value 5.31.90 (est.) U.S. Treasurey Money Mkt 1,351,328.12 (1,721,000.00) Gov't., Securities Fund 1,200,000.00 (1,762,000.00) TOTAL FITNDS AVAILABLE: $3,485,469.31 � Funds Available 12/31/89 6,026,184.56 6/30/89 3,372,191.00 Rates Mone Market June 29 Bank 6.60% Fid 7.91% LES:kkb 7-11-90 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 13, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admin'st or FROM: Klayton H. Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets Mendota Woods (Patrick) Job No. 8922 Improvement No. 89, Project No. 7 DISCUSSION• Attached are the Mendota Woods Developer's Agreement and final plat for Council approval. The developer has paid the park dedication fee and signed the agreement. The final plat is completed with the exception of a street name change. The developer wishes to name the street Arbor Court rather than Ryan Road. Staff does not see any prob- lems with the proposed name change. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends Council authorize the Mayor and City Admin- istrator to execute the developer's agreement and approve the final plat subject to receiving the plat with the street name correction. ACTION REQUIRED• If Council concurs with the staff recommendation they should pass a motion authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to execute the developers agreement and adopting Resolution No. 90- , RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR MENDOTA WOODS. KHE:dfw City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 90- RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR MENDOTA WOODS WHEREAS, a final plat for Mendota Woods has been submitted to the Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said final plat. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the final plat of Mendota Woods submitted at this meeting is hereby approved. 2. That the appropriate City officials be and they are hereby authorized to execute the final plat on behalf of the City of Mendota Heights. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mend'ota Heights this 17th day of July, 1990. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk � " �. CONTRI�CT'Ft�R SINGLE. FAMILY DEVELQPM�.�vT . Job No. 8922. Imp. No.� $9-7 This Agr�ement, made and entered into thi.s l��'`--- day of , 1990, by and between the Ca.ty of Mendota Heights, Dakot Gaunty, Minnesota, {hereinatter called the "Ci.ty") an� Stephen and Jana Patrick, 737 Mendata Heights Road, Mendota Heights, MN 551�0 and' Bill Lent:.ch,�j9t3 North Dal�, St. • Paul, I�I 55117 (hereinafter called the "I�faveloper" } . W I T N E S S E T ii: �+tHEREAS, Develoger propases a plat_for a single fama.ly develop- ment in Mendota Heights to be known as Mendota Woads, consisting of 11 single family lats on ap�roximately 13 acres ,located south of Mendot�a FIaights Road,•east of Dodd Road; and �rf�iEREAS,'public services are needed by �he Developer �ram ��nda�a Hei+ghts in order ta proceed wa.�th said development. NOW THEFtEF4RE, it is hereby �:grcea I�y a:�d be�.ween the two parties as follows: l. in the event that the City initiates litigation to enforce per.formance of the D�velaper's abiir�ations hereunr�er, the City shall be entitled �o reimbursemen� of all costs and attorney fees incurred in cannection�therewith, whether incurred prior to or after entry of judgment. 2. Developer will peti�ion the City for needed public improve- me�.ts {Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Watermains, and ' Stx•eets}. Deve2oper agrees to pay $i650.00 esa�ow to i:he City as per Cirdinanae No. 1503. Escrow to be re�unded upon successful compI.etian of a project. 3. Develaper wi13. pravide at no cost tc� the City all needed temporary construction easement� ta install said improve- mer�ts and thase permanent, right of way and ea�ements, necessary for said pubiic improvements. . �# . Developer will proceed .immediately to con�raissi.on a regis- ter.ed land surveyor �:o place and maintain enougLz lr�t corners so that street center la.nes ana all utilities cu� be loca�ed by City staff. 5. Developer aaknowledges that there wi.11 be park con�rikaution dua to the City as per Qrdinance No. 3Q1, Section 6 as amQzded by Resolutian 80- 16. Tha� contributian, i� �o be $600 per lot or $6, 000. 00 and is payable a�. the time '�lie MaXor signs �the final plat. ,� 6. City agrees; "'�� complete the � ti•� .. the Developer or ].ot awner ' ' ir..dividual lats. s�reet and �rulevard grading and shall complete the_grading o�' T. Grading operatians may be cofipleted in phases {i.e. individ- ua.l lots) by the Devela�per/Homebuilder. Each lot must be st�bmitted for approval, To gain approval, the _ Developer/Homebuilder provide a grading plan that shows at a:minimum erosion control measures, the existing and pro- � pcsed Iat carner elevations, elevations for garage floor and first floor, and elevations for al.l breaks in grade for each lot, Alsa a$1,000 escrow shall accompany each phase plan. Ariy change in a phase of the grading shall require reapprov- al. The escrow shall be returned upan satisfactory cample- tian of the grading operations. The Developer agrees to nQtify Lot Owners/Homebuilders of these requirements. 8. If and when there is an exces�ive buildup of mud or dirt on existing Ca.ty streets as'a result of building aperations, the Developer shall have the affected streets swept'by mechanical means� at the direction of the City. 9. The DeveloperfHomebui.lder wi11 be responsible for repairing damage to public utiZities incurred as a resuit af building can�truction or private utility installation. There�ore the Developer sha3.l notify the IiomebuilderjLot Owner at the time o�' sale of a lot of this stipulation. 10. It is the City's desire ta cause �he least amount of dis- turbanae ta the existing stand of oak trees on the site. The Ci�y has commi�sianed an oak wiit specialist to provide r�±commendation� for protecting the oak trees during grading operations and canstructian. Tite Develaper agrees to fo].low these recommendations in all activities an the site, and agrees to natify new lot owners andjan c��mebui3ders of these recommendatioris. 12. � The Developer agrees to include notifications of airaraf� noise attenuation construction requirements in the restric- tive covenants on a31 lots in the subdivision. A11 homes in subdivsion must be built to the City�s S.T.C. Code Require- ments.The Develaper shall provide a capy of these covenants to the City for review at the time the final plat is signed b T the Mayor. �C-ac-�Q�rZ �}LS�q�Es �'n 1��T�rY hr� ,v�� y�r ��s m� -r��C zo��n,L o�F��.��.R� n,�rF.�r��« 54c�.o.,�a��,, �-�� r��n..o,�,�",'' 12. If at anytime the Developer is not in compliance with this agreement, the City reserves the righ� ta correc� the areas of non-compliance after giving the Developer 48 haurs no- tice. All costs associated with making the corrections sha7.1 be charged to the Develaper, 13. A� �he Developer actually consists of several individuals with varying degrees of involvement, the Developer shall designate one person as the legal Developer Represen�Gative. Trie Developer Representative is assumed ta represent the .•_ iriterest of.� he Developers, and the Cit:-;, shall take actions -., ., a.c:cordingly.._ The City will direct all *g,aestions, informa- " tion and requirements to the Developer Represeritative.. 2�iotification to the Developer Representa�cive shall be.con- szdered notification to the�Developer as a whole.� The City will not act on Developer's request that has not been pre- sented via the Developer Representative. The official Developer Representative is listed below. If the Developer w3shes to redesignate the Developer Representative a notifi- cation signed by all those persons signing the Developer's Agreement stating this fact shall be del"ivered to the City. DESIGNATED AEVELOPER REPRESENTATIVE �'� � - � ( G _ ( P se, Pr \ � � . '��- (S �aue) CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor M. Thomas Lawell, City Administrator DEVELOPERS DECLARATION OF'COVENANTS, CONDZTLDNS'AND RESTR7LTIONS FOR MENDOTA �rI00DS This Declaration is made this 3rd day of July, �1990 by Wil.li.am M. Lentsch, Stephen Patrick and Jana Patrick, a joint venture �aiown as "Mendota Woods" (Declarant) Whereas, Declarant is the owner of the real property described in Article I of this declaration, and i.s desirous of subj ecting such real property to the restrictions, covenants, reservations, easements, liens and charges herein- after set forth, each and all of which is and are for the benefit of such property and for each owner thereof, and shall inure to the benefit and pass with such property, and each and every parcel thereof, and sha11 apply to and bind the successors in interest, and any owner thereof; Now therefore, Declarant hereby declares that the real property descr�bed and referred to in Article I hereof is and shall be held, transferred, sold and conveyed subject to the conditions, restrictions, covenants, reservations, easements, liens and charges hereinafter set forth. ARTICLE I PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THIS DECLARATION 1.1 The real property which is and shall be held and conveyed, transferred and sold subject.to this Declaration is located in theaCity of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, and is more particularly described as follows: ARTICLE II GENERAL PURPOSES OF DECLARATION 2.1 Declarant has had this Declaration prepared and recorded as part of a general plan for developing the Property into a subdivision of si.ngle-family lots (collectively the "Lots" and individually a"Lot") for improvement and sales to owner-occupants. 2.2 the Property is subjected to the covenants, restrictions, conditions, reservations, liens"and charges hereby declared to insure the best use and most appropriate development and improvemant of each Lot; to protect the owners of Lots against such improper use of surrounding Lots as will depreciate th the value of their Lots; to preserve as far as practicle the natural beauty pf the property; to guard against the erections on the Property of poorly designed or proportioned structures; and structures built of 3mproper or unsuitable materials; to obtain harmonious color schemes; to insure the highest and best use and development of the Property, with appropriate locations of such homes on the Lots; to prevent haphazard and inharmonious improvements of Lots; to secure and maintain proper setbacks from the streets,and adequate free spaces between structures; and in gerneral to provide adequately for a quality type of improvement in the Property, and thereby to enhance the value of investments made by the purchasers of Lots. ARTICLE III 3.I No building shall be erected, placed or altered on any Lot until the building plans and specifications and a site plan showing Che lacatia� of such building have been agpraved in writing by Declarant as to conformity and harmony o£ external design with e�ist3ng struc�ures on �he property, and as ' to location of the building with respect to tapography and f 3nished ground e2evation. If DaclaranC fails to approve or disapprave such design and loca�ion within thirty days after plans and specificatians and a site plan have been submi.tted to Declarant, such appxoval shall deemed to have been granted as of the thirty-first day �ollowa.ng submissian to DeclaranC. Declarant shall not be liable to anyone in damages whn has submittad plans far agproval, or to any owner by reason af mistake in judgement, negligence, ar nonfeasance of itself, its agents, or emplopees arising out af or 3n cannection with the appraval ar disapproval of any such plans. 3.2 Na building sha11 be Iocated less than thirty {34} feet from the front line of the Lat nor less than thirty (30) feet from the reax of the 1ot line. No such building shall be lacated Zess than ten {IQ} feet from any side �ot line excep� a garage which shall be na less"than five (5) f eet from any side lot line. 3.3 No noxious or offensive trade or activity sha�l be permitted on ar to escape from any Lo�, nar sha11 anything be done thereon which may hecome an annoyance or nuisance. ` 3.4 No-building or structure of a temporary charact�r and no trailer, basemenC tent, shack, garage or out-build3ng shall be used at any time as a residential dwelling on any Lot, either temporarily or parmanen�ly. A motorboat, houseboa� or other similar water-borne vehicle may be maintained, stored or kept on a Lo� only if it is na greater than twenty (2Q) feet in length, and eiCher housed completely within a structure which has been approved by Declarant pursuant to paragraph 3.1, or stored on a drivewag in a location that daes nat interf ere with pedestrian or vehicular traffic on the praperty. Na recreational vahicles. No cammercial vehicles, tanks, or commercial equipment of any kind sha11 be lacated, stored ar parked an any building Lot. 3.5 No primary resideutial structure sha1.I. be parmitted an an.y Lot i� the habitable floor area thereof, exclusive of basements, porches and garages i.s 3.ess than fourtaen hundred {1,440} square feet in �he case of a one-story structure or less than twenty-five hundred (2,500) square feet in the case of a one and one-half, two or two and one-half story structure ar as agprove.d. by Declarant. 3.6 No an��I.s or poultry of any kind other than common house pets such as dogs and cats, with the exception of no Pit Bu11 Terriers, s1�a11 �ie kept or maintained on any part oi the Property. 3. 7 No fence, wall, or hedge shall bs perinitted . to..e�ctend beyortd tha minimu� bui3.di.ng �,�tback Iines established herein except upon approval bq Declaran� as provided 3n Paragraph 3,1. 3.8 No building or structure shall be constructed, altered ar maintained an any Lot without a garage which garage shal2 contaa.sz space far at Ieast two and nat more than three cars. 3.9 No building or structure sha1l be constructed., al�ered or maintained on any I,ot unless it has a driveway from the street running ta the garage, which driveway , . � 4 must be of sufficient area to park at least tuzo cars entirely of� the street. 3.10 No signs of any kind shall be displayed to public view on any Lot except a house number sign, or name sign, of not more than one square foot, or except one sign of not more than three square f eet advertising the property for sale; provided, however, that this shall not apply to advertising signs placed on any lot by Declarant. 3.11 No trash recepticles, or garbage cans shall be permitted to be placed outside a building or structure, unless hidden by an attractive screen of suitable height, or unless sunken to ground level in a hole lined with permanent cribbing. _ 3.12 All utility connection facilities and services shall be underground. 3.13 No exterior towers or antennas of any kind shall be constructed, modified, or permitted on the ground of any Lot. Reasonable television . antennas�are permitted on dwellings or garages. 3.14 No Lot may be further subdivided without written approval of the Declarent pursuant to Paragraph 3.1. , 3.15 Multiple family dwellings are not permitted., only singe familq residences. 3.16 All residences must comply with local ordix�ances pertaining to being located in airport noise Zone Four (Least restrictive.) I.E. triple glazed glass windows, central air conditioning, minimum attic insulation levels. A copy of the ordinances is attached. ,, 4 ARTICLE IV SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST TO DECLARANT 4.1 At any time during the period in which Declarant owns an interest 3.n the property or any part thereof, but in any event no later than the date as of which Declarant no longer owns an interest in the property or any part thereof, Declarant shall appoint an architectural control committee (Hereinafter the "committee" composed of no less than three but no more than five persons, at least two of whom shall be owners of Lots who purchased such Lots for their own residential use. In the event of death or resignation of any member of the Committee, the remaining member(s) sha11 have full authority to designate a representative with like authority. Neither Declarant nor the representative members of the Committee shall be entitled to any compensation for services performed pursuant to this Declaration. 4.2 If Declarant appoints a Committee, then such Committee shall have all. of the rights and obligations of "Declarant" under this Declaration, and Declarant itself shall have no further obligations, responsibility or li.ability whatsoever hereunder. 4.3 �he rights hereby reserved to Declarant shall apply with equal force and effect to Declarant's successors and assigns in the event ownership and control of the rights hereby reserved pass from the Declarant (whether by reason of the appointment of a receiver, assignment for the benefit of creditors, bankrupcy, sale under legal process of any kind, transfer o£ the ownership of a majority interest in Declarant or otherwise), and the rig�ht to enforce the covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements set forth in this Declaration shall • immediately pass, without further action by Declarant or any other party, to Declarantts successor who shall within thirty (30) flays of such passage, if such appointments have not already occurred, appoint all members of the Committee in the manner provided in Paragraph 4.1 hereof, as if it were in fact "Declarant." ARTICLE V OTHER PROVISIONS S.1 This Declaration shall run with the land and shall be binding on all parties and all persons claiming under them until Januarq 1, 2002, at which time this Declaration shall automatically be extended for successive periods of ten (10) years unless by vote of Declarant, the Committee or any successor in interest to either of the foregoing it is agreed to change this Declaration in whole or in part. ' 5.2 If the owner of any Lot or his/her heir, assign or other successor in interest shall violate or attempt to violate this Declaration or any provision hereof, it shall be lawful for any other person or person's owning a Zot as well as for Declarant, the Committee or any successor in interest to either of the foregoing, to.prosecute a proceeding at law or in equity against the person or persons violating or attempting to violate this Declaration, either to prevent him/her/them from doing so or to recover damages for such violation, or both. 5.3 Invalidation of any provision of this Declaration or any part hereof by judgements or court order shall not affect any of the provisions hereof, which shall remain in force and effect to the fullest extent possible. , IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has hereunto set its hand this day of , 19 . BY• BY: BY: Subscribed and sworn before me by and this day of , 19 s I have read and understand all provisions of the foregoing covenant and hereby agree to abide by all such provisions. � .� � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 13, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Assessments Rolls: Big Wheel Auto - Job No. 8808, Imp. 88-3 Ivy Falls Creek - Job No. 8704, Imp. 87-2 North Ivy Hills 2nd Add. - Job No. 8220, Imp. 88-6 Alice Lane - Job No. 8911, Imp. 89-3 DISCUSSION• There are four projects that need to be assessed in 1990, Big Wheel Auto 5ite Improvements, Ivy Falls Creek Addition, North Ivy Hills 2nd Addition and the Alice Lane Subdivision. The costs for these projects are currently being tabulated and spread into individual assessments, however they were not completed as of agenda time on Friday. These individual assessment rolls and explanations of how they were arrived at will be distributed to Council as soon as they are completed, we are trying to have them ready to hand out Tuesday evening. Because of publication deadlines we are asking that Council authorize staff to publish for the public hearings for the August 21st City Council meeting tonight. Staff will then have the August 7th meeting before the hearings to distrib- ute the rolls and discuss them before the public hearings. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the assessment roll hearings for the above projects be scheduled for August 27, 1990 City Council meeting. ACTION REOUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 90- , RESO- LUTION CALLING FOR HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR BIG WHEEL AUTO SITE (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. 3, IVY FALLS CREEK ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO. 2) NORTH IVY HILLS 2ND ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. 6) AND ALICE LANE SUBDIVISION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 3) IMPROVEMENTS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. 3). JED:dfw � � City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 90 - RESOLUTION CALLING FOR HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR BIG WHEEL AUTO SITE (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88-3) IVY FALLS CREEK ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO. 2) NORTH IVY HILLS 2ND ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. 6) ALICE LANE SUBDIVISION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJE.CT NO. 3) IMPROVEMENTS • WHEREAS, contracts have heretofore been let for the construction of the following described improvements: The construction of sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water, street, curb and gutter improvements to serve the Big WHeel Auto Site, Ivy Falls Creek Addition, North Ivy Hills 2nd Addition and Alice Lane Subdivision (which improvements have heretofore been known and designated as Improvement No. 88, Project No. 3, Improvement No. 87, Project No. 2, Improvement No. 88, Project No. 6, and Improvement No. 89, Project No. 3) and WHEREAS, the construction of said improvements has been substantially completed; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the aid and assistance of the City Engi- neer, was previously directed by the City Council to prepare the as- sessment rolls for the above described improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has notified the City Council that a proposed assessment roll for the above described improvements has been complet- ed and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That a public hearing on said proposed assessment rolls shall be held at the Mendota Heights City Hall at 1101 Victoria Curve, in the City of Mendota Heights, on Tuesday, August 21, 1990, at 7:45 o'clock P.M or as soon as possible thereafter. 2. That the City Clerk, with the aid and assistance of the City Attorney, is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and attend to the publication and mailing of the necessary notices of said hearing, all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17th day of July, 1990. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL �` JULY 17, 1990 General Contractors License Butler Housing Ken's Roofing Company Rem-Con, Inc. Sandvik Construction Co., Inc. Excavatinct Licenses Danner Landscaping Ingram Excavating, Inc. July 17, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council CLAIMS LIST SUMMARY: Tota1 Claims Significant Claims W. St. Paul (1990 dispatching) a Unusual Claims Bond Payments American Nation First Trust Norwest GMH Aspha.Zt Park construction Kodet Architect Park Bldq $ 1,184,577 � 51, 283 157,600 704,000 147,940 92,532 2,534 -�t � �epc tv-Ham + � � r_ - , 15-Engr 13 .Su7.' :�'33�+ . 7/17/90 �.I � i ms L 1 sx , .,, ._ 20-PoZioe � �i^a x7:�37 rat� Tr9ty of t�;Proc;at� r•1elgttal 30-Pire � 40-CEO TPrn{:+ �CY+e+r.k Y�u�nber :t 3er,t�_ � ^._.;7E8Ch NUtnbE't' 'JE!YrtlCl^ NRMB FiC'CC�tIYi'� �CGG' � 1=iYl4T tn:i-4''2_:a.'+7-..kyy:rZq�.wa-„+� 1 Tota]� YQm{a �t��c.k nturntaer .. Temp �fsr_�ck Fucrrrttt�r � ,= F!G'G ria7�awar^E+ tZi+'�^4 ;3:r��th��L°�-i"�� f1.1'�ci2G TE?A7�':t C.hP_C3{ :l'Ltf!)�7Ef• ._ 3ern�r f'rreck �icrrntrer� 3 + . . 3 fimeriFc�rr Nat3a»al Sank r,`: -�t•?:16--iZ+2+i�....yt,m'� � .. 3�intr: r.t ca» 7V� t 3 er^ra S�aia3r 4c -�l+lr.:a;s-zm��:-t2rZ+ - 3 FrnTer]car� J4aT�ora3 Fank Y.3:i-,=;1::+ � iffrlEt`.2G'cil� 1�at:4r.��aS L•iai^r:t �2+2^-1c�� 7� . Tatal � 3ern�a �heck ;Vumber^ 3 • 7en7p �rier_k' Number � j+ . , , rr £<ar�ton fiscnrnarr r2+�-<'r:'_�c^�2+^sh�[+it•--Ytt2 +f 7�ta 1 s':' Tens� t�.'rrecx h+ur:rt�ei^ . 4, r �� . Tern� �i'icck_ 1Vettnber_. i:. � �� ,,i, �,+^ „ ',.4 1{'C3J'd Gi` '3vETi.�Y' L`G�'l17It72553{:Y7Et^5 �i^i}•}i,1'^3i✓-32Li {'•� . ti L•taarc} c+T 2Aate7^ �c:an7mi5�]o»er, 4+El--4��--¢�Q+�Z+-�."+ `..r £c�2r^rJ c�f SJater^ Lc}rntn2ss2c�nerS L�:c-�4=ri"3^3��-':f2+ 1� iotal5 T�m�r �»ecx JVtihii�!?/•^ � �'errtp �»ec�h Nurnbe.r 6 j a�:kty c.f S7 �t fiau2 &}#-�r;�7�-¢+�.=t..T+-;.'�rT , c i�.tty a3' w 9G �`atr2 ttrK�-9',�7:3�-t2+3�h-3'�+ 3'2 � TcfYal »-r� '} c:rnp �heck :derurbe>^ � "�:rn�:+ �t�e.�ck Jvumber , i L'CrY�tin�+��ta] �Cetblc?V:l53�'.t, 71-4L'�S'�th�-EG3td-;;:it . �..._.��-.,..«_ ;�.��__ __ «.. _.„ _ t�..u�lY1:�1B1`rY� S ,7lfY SVC h735C SL�:��S -• 8� bds ESt� L"+As �� taas E)r� �Cs uept �U-Rd&Bridge 60-7Ttilities ,. , iw� 70-Parks Fa�e 1 _ g;�, •:, �u7 80-P2anning � - . 85 Recgc2ing - , "�1 �0-AII.7.7fIdI Cp!]'rT01 fie 5�b3ey F•ark � '7'64. S:.r �• 76+'�. 3 :r . .. .. �u.t. _ � _ . • _ . Jttrr Svc 3: , _r„ i. ,. �- '.d6.3w Jttrr 5vc -,: � , . .'. , ��:. .. �, _ . . '7.II��- . Jurf svc 7.:.3 :t 3t�. :��r 23�Ls d.i s�r svc 19�tG.'+ d.tsp svc _sul svc �3.� i�ti'r3_ .33 �u� 'r?L.��`. �t+� :13$;?�:3.t13 J.. �� 4 � f ; 3 .7cr.t s S'.ir2'+ TY^2 3 4: 31 S�M 7emn �YTer_;t tvtlr,7b�r 7 Yera�. �:reck tJi�rnber^ ver•,dc.r Narne r'rccc�ir»i: �odP 7 f'OnL' 1)'3isYtY .a1 C.,,'�`. ev2 s] oi7 �7 -•i'� Y.,L?-•E 1�-3¢'+ ;4 'Fc:�ra]s Terou �riec.k ;durnf�er 7 � � Tr=m�� '�YrecH )�urrtber E� � ' S rievi>r �L�s4er^ v.'�i-433i-��fC�-:'�ti'+ - 3 Tr L-a 1 s 7F�i:�.� �»eck tv��r,7b�r f� Terap L;�eck tJttrnber ' • � • tt �c etrEya>'d TAarJ^i e.tt - L�1'-4%+t}+'�--�:..'fC+=.-�i.'� .. .. 5 Tata3s 7�mp TyT��ck faumbPr• :� Ter,T� �t�eck taun�bei• 3�2+ 1� Dah2 gren Sh�rd2 cw 't�tlar� Cn1 -�4�2;=3 -3 3.:�-Sfl, . � Y�Z+ l7ariSnr�e» :�harc7Si�w Uba» �+2-42��+-•33�-•t�T2'+ ..^ i.�� . , n . . , . � r ,. . �V Tc�tal s't ernp if'teck fdurnber 9 i2+ 'i'emp Check Nr.r�nber 12 •�.' ;'r. ' ' " , " .;• •_.a _ . .r� 13 iSakota i:cunty Tech ��1nst �+4-44'f0�+-•Q��Q-;� -� �•- __ �" � , . . _ � . Y .. ..d 1] ' Tata t s 7einp ChPck 7vumbPr 11 7ernp �Y1eck Nurnbet^ is�- 1;= fSarrr,er^ Lantlscap2»r� 7G�I—H3iZJ"Ir:JL�"JY� ' __ _ 1. • .. _ " ,. 1;� Tata.isu�7en�p Ct�e=ck �veember.',.. ._, 7� _ .. � .. n .._�.Iv, _. 3em{7 �Y7eck TUurnbPr^ S 3 13 3=2rst Tr{ist i=r-?4.:�6-¢n'[.Ql-81it 23 Plr�st 7rt�st 14•-hti'�;'--Y+�Y+�2+-•7�'r¢� i� }' 1 T'SL 7 1`ttS7: I 4-+i:='�E�'-Q��it�-'iC•lf 13 fi1rsL- Tr^ust 11-•4�s:,:!-�+Z�ii�-•'E'�'h 1 3 f'1 r^st T>^ctst 1.i -v�'�26-�Z+iZ�-a'��"L+ � g F 2)^sL '➢'t^usz 3 1--+'i4� E-�4+�2�Q+-vT+iY+ 73 t=2'r'•st ?r^ees: 1�-�r93r-4��2+L'+--r2'a'� � •r�i,r:.c` ...:.�: T1a.tnrs Li�st_•-�� ..c��Y�,t� ..�. .,+s ; t:ity of 1�endoL-a Neights i omrnerr�c s ��u1 svc t`teaver^ tr�app3ng . . Re i,at^1 c.c?c . �• , � �- - , ,_ �; Paye � , . . - . _ ; _ . _ v.� '.J �� i;n7c.trnz '�i :s. '9.1 _"__^' „i . ., . �;� r� ��_ B. ti4!� •--•-----• � �' 3';= 6. �,�c. 3 :a1 _ �c1� � `,1. 4: n � ' i ,1 -' J une: ret a i»er � z'+��. �^Y� - . '� run extras - ___�r�-69 ..� . • .. <'!� .... .� _ . , _ 1 S %i44. �'� • , ' � ., ..... - . y� ... . ., ' ,,. . tj ----�June-�r•»g _�._ ___ _ _. 7�.�.Y� r., « , .) � , , . . . • c _ ' �, "�;: '. �'..r' , , !Y. E+Ct• + . , .. . . � _ E ' ,•7 ; sa .�i ' :JY�. ��7A . , a .- .. .%: _""'___' 1 t ,� : � 3Y�. Y1iQ� . , _. . . c f , ri . ... .;b ,t�• .:_.l":Ji .t•_f.� licv' .�1: rJ�•r , � �..J."� . .. � 1 7f bds ��Ji2�Z.a'..0 ?7 bn5 ;?�7 Q�ih¢r. tY+�Z: 7! uds :='�9.38 %',� 2�d5 . 9✓� �Q1�Q+. L.'+'4!+ 1� Y�ds s?E'3..'�,:J 7i= UCS 4� � 3 aY+. U.'4YL� '13 bos �4s 4',F+ff+, F+YD • - ' - ' - - - ' - - - - - ` - - - - - -- - ---- - -' '- -• -- -- - - -�-- - - - -- �-- - - - - ' -- -' -- �- a �4' �r i 'S �s .xz+s x�a� � Fr# 11 :33 r"ihJ �Tel»(s i�ri�ck ivrrm?,e�^ 13 "fernp. r:.»ec'r. Ncrm7er- VEsndc.r^ tJarne y3 t=.tr-�:t Yri�sr• 7 3 � .� r•st «"r�i+st i 3 i=.1 t^Ss :�J^CtSx 23 �'2rst Yrust 7:a }=11^5L' i"1^tt5t . � �J� ' r 7'c.ta�� Terq�t �Yierk Ntlf/lY1P..7• 7c:rrr�a f:,trt�r_^?t tjurnt+er• Y tr / � . , sti �'lr-st 'ir-u�:t . 1 rr Ps rsz Tt^c�st 1 4 P.3 r^st •Tr^uss •w - s9 f=.trst..c7'rust: ... _, � 3ti F2rGt 7rust � 4 �-.t rst 'f`r,�rsc 1�r f=.'r^s4 Tf^tr>t I �F r- 2 }^S� i't`ttSt s�r filr�ss "}'rtrs7 '� � s 4 F't rst 7t-t+st s rt F2 rsz. Tr^uat . 74 �'srst rruss 1�t3 z . ::�a �. . �.... ,.. 7"ata:! 5 Yer,�+p �'rleck rit�fnbe.r 7'im�:+ �3sc?r_7t tVur11be1^ 3:: 1� �'A'f^st ."f'r^ust� �,..� .•. 2.'.� f=2rst' 7rtest " h .` a :J Fl�rst 'f'rust-- •-.•-_ 7� �'1�rst''�T,rust�� La� ... 1� F3rst Trust x:s F' 2 r-st 7'rcrst 9L!r .. „ _ .t.. . Tota15 T�raFx� �Ytec3r A;urnt+�r . . � . _. , {'� ^- Twra}� '�»eck tvun7tier y 6 16 Li?�fN fis(.�f-ia2 L• �orP 2fa tiMht ta��halt i:.c�^P -- . _. _�E t.' _�3': .. - ' + . ,> .,Yc _. ...... .. . 7c.T.23 � 3ern� �f-�ec^k 7Vurnber . 7Enr(_+ �hc>Ck tVtrMt�rar ^ . 2? � iT S3@YiP_ t'ii'� �GIfiA7ttYt'2 CB'L' 3 6Yt5 t;321ms L.tst � -, Li�y c� t�iendc�� Y,e�g3'�ts firccoitr,t Cc�ce :4�-4 };:i2:'-'✓:Y+i'C•-�kTV.i 1 �+�-4'r:,^�,-i.�t2�iC ^��o 1 •?^'4+}�F_,...�^u2'{L.3-�L:�+' 1 +�i ^- }.y` J'v^�"'L�£'+fI ^7Z Ch X 4-4[}��G-•'Yrk'yL�^»Ya.hib 13 i �'—�iiT:1J"L.�F�iZ.7i-^C'�✓Ic'} 71t-��?+�:s:,". _Y+�rr2t _.'� �.�^�Y:r:.�-tZ�tl.c3-4?� �.'. 2 4-44�%E�•-^iD4'�a1-•'�+t2s , .. 'v.:r-4+t� F�-4.'.t.L�%-�;2> 3C5--4+t:iFa--k'h71+'K -�Q»[+ 1 �F^-ti�i.G ."h,�+^'tc9icJlT%--12�ib �t-•��:�s-�,��-��r�.� - 3'7�-%,��i:1u-�f[ �-i2�cl 3%'''-9r .?E,_.7n�YL7...�. . Y3:c -�i � i .`.'.< L.'�1 ��g;?zf'�.*t 1 ti� 7u--%f9^..fr��-�L�t2�-t2i�:� . 7',"°'..�'-49:�6'-�YziZt-"k�S+ . � . 1 G-tttt:S6-'�+Y�+tr+--0t2c .,.._ i�4--44g�E}-•Q+'��7Zf-'Q+� . . .. J fJ�-��+��+✓-�12�2+-�+"Y. � t�.�-itti� rG ^ �th�-S."�2t SJ . • .. tn'3-<F+iE$�"(Ai2�¢ "-k"�tz sY+ ✓-4 4 E� 2?r - 2� i1+� - 42+Y i �° . .i� . � SE tA1 "ft..`s.:.,s"K<-�4.'it1�-.';•i2< �- _.. _ - .i T- � ' ' . . F'2P0 _P 3 M�, ... ..�- �L� , '..`l �c�nrrnent: s i'3 bC, �' 73 bds rfi t.�r. _. iD *,�ds l f L?C15 7T bds 77 t�ds 7? Y�d5 ' %7. t+ds ?� l�ds Ti �d5 :•i YsaS 7t9 rsds '3'3 trds � ,. "l fi 'f7c7 s , ' .`JG �+}tFAG 5 v�, pyn;ts �,rnr ur�i: ...� t�L:,, Q+fi12�_ �'[+�."+ ;��?:S_ � 5 `.�,:s't. .�'s� ; .•-! : t.� Y:�iZt7•. x?k� i°'i r3. 3.{'9 . �y , __�__._�_.�_. � 7 , j-�s.i. 79;.a. tc"r� . � � +li $:rL.�. E�'4.� �� . ;;,i6j Gwk'+E+. 4h5"L'+ , . 5y «i,:��'+. t7�'+ �... . . . :} . . , .. 6� +?t'Ii3. �+i2: . : � . . . , , , ''• � 5$'�. �sL� ". Y +>`3f . ��+ ' :�ti�9_ :su •�1 3�� ifl7� ..r�X'i �..i� �.4k�i�i. ��'+ tY'} ' � `. - ' ` F� � x''_L.""J.3E9 „ � • :.ti;7s �2+iv'�t+. $ti2S ' ' _ - . . :fY .ws iZ»Zt�c'+. 7ZrQ7Ct^ .. - -• ---_..»"---"' r4�i . . . . . x 8G, ?`3.�i. 7� 1 , . �... ._ _. �„ � � . .1 .. �. . :,'i .�' ^i i +. K . , y't :S • ,: y �:' . _ ., . 'a' . 353 bds .�.�+ � . . ... , ._ . .. 6t�y Yu"tZ'0. Es�a . _ . � w . �� l��:i .��« �3 bOs , ':�'d . 2 7s ;..="3c. :ss2e „.��:._^%; , -$3 "Y2 7' bCfs 19s t2iS. i4i2'� .• +:.Y, ._ $;1 b05 rl�...` •.�v. .� . ` y:..le93T1'St3�7.:a+2+ t� 5,��' : .1.� ..-+.�:t4�� '-� 8& 27ds 1:�QFs 7Zi��. $J72 i3r_� iars t�:.ss 437:':1TZ:r:.�=s _ .' .._ . . �. _.. . _� �4Hi4'9��.:�t2'i � - --.. ,.. :. � - � ; .t" :, 1 .. r.r�.. .. , r�.� r� .r.3. � ...t .c,� : i t. ,.�'" F'Yrnt 1 �3-bR W`.�i� •%'.54: B:�J�t� � �r•.� " . .I . e � � PYrr:G � fl'SJ-f�ri 4&7 7??. �1 .. ._ `t;.c' J -i . . _ - . �'�t_ --____—_", ijct�f,vi - .. - '� '9:�5:.s3iY.6£i � , i. . r. , y- _ a _' . _ «� z � ... '-. . . [. , . _ � x � � . �agear� r'pr^s 3I. ✓�:� �. . .. �: , .. : ..a � ;3 23 Ju3 19z3S+ �2a1ms L1st �,�.' r,,.-,=,risr ^., "-:� PE7lJP 4 ^•._ , _�� Fri 11:�1 At4 �ity c�f ttlendr�ta Ne2ghts -� .- .- . � 7�m� i_t�er_k �vc+mt+er 2? T em�. L'TT PC:{ TJUt/lbP.t` '��E]�d�'�T' JJcifRE� NCCbtIYt't �CGP 17 T3Pne�ra2 Conlrnctnlc�ticns Q�1-433Y+-•A��-��v's :7 L3e»e.r^aI �cvnr�7tri�3eat3c.ns �Zi-<r33ti."�-4:3z?•-3�.a :7 L+pr>e�^a1 ��rnMu»icatioi�s i�i'-'1F,?{ {4'�"'t}:JL:�'-3�i C".� L9 r . ` 5'c.Y•a�s ?'ernfi Gneck Nurnbe.r 17 Ta_m{_* 7rhecX tvzrnrbe�^ 9t3 - . ' - , . 15 i3oadyear.^ 9erv3 ce 9ta>,P �.'+5 -�r33t?-4�p-��.'4 i� (:CrCtCy�'E'�irl^ �.iBl^4'�CP �tcere 7�+3-'4a�i�f-•4�4v"D'��'L_'7 :.tC , � 'fc�tais ienTp �ner_H Number 29 • , . . ' . Yem�r t'tt�r_k fvtrfr�L+�r• � 19 ' 39 t•Src.Gw3]1 Fnc;ustr2es S»c �¢+:�-4; 63-fn3`r-:3�, 1$ �. ' � . . . . 7c.ta3s Tenif:. �rr�ck fVumL�er x9 . Ternp �Y�ecfc tYuntL�er . ��t2+ � . � . ��4'r t3cvt 'fralr,2ng Svc �3-448P+-�2�`Y-:=�� L�S+ ' . ,. ... _ _. c�o� .._ ,. _ .. . � _. � � „ _ 'Fc ta 3 s 7em} ��Yeeck 7V«r,�be�^ ;�- - � _ „ ..�. �. �. .. .. S ' " , r . � . . � TEb7{? L"YJEC}C iVttJllbP_J^ i�1 �-:� Nt »cf 1 rrg rteat i ng t1+1-433.:,-313-3tt+ .=1 " . , , _. . � • .. . TciaSs TPmp��hc:ck ivt�rnber �1--� - Temp �Y7ec3r Numi�er •�,� ._: s� r� r� � r mi =�:� e:ti> r� tn �, rr Y Yti-•413�-•11¢+-SY+ 1� j 7cta2s 'femp �»eck 1Vurnber^ ��. Ternp �;�wck 1Vuraber• c3 ;=� Fvy fiaru 7'awnhouse Assrr tn-_r•-y�46i�-•��-•c.'��A �3 / To�2:a15 Yen�p L'hecH Wcimt_+Pi^ :�3 7emp �»ecfc Nurni�er 2%s ,'i _j ' �-. �C fiifAL'Yt't 5 i�li7«LtYi S� � . •. � panei^ rars E'?. �+r . payer r��rs ��_ :�3 ,,,� �clC7E'1^ 1^L�l"R ��.1��12+ .. • • • 3 G fS _ 4! , `.� -e . � . , .. , _.. � • .� t 3 7�BS I iyG. JL , t.t i^e r^pr �. �a�s 1 ' , .� 23;.�� ._ �...._. - - -• ------ .. ) ;�iay svc ._36. �tio i � ,v. . . ,z26,�t�'� . ' .7 regr^ Sr2oger^ � . _ . �%r. �7L.a . , . . C' , . :�' _ . ` ' ' ' ' ' c . , .. _ ai�l. P�17 : _ � � � .!.C�' .. . .. . �L. , , \ v t� . ._ .. . . • ' _ .� , rprs ., 6�+.:,itv,,: •�� . ,. � .. . ;G .-, :. . _ 6+T. :�L1 (, � , - . ., . �r- --" , 6/;:� payt•a3� �." ��+ ,._. " . • , 29G�.53 ., _ ��29 p,�yr�-�s s 84. 4� � ------- :�b:�. 3'� r�prs exp reirrb �i. �'+f[ �1. �Y1 �� . 23 Sul 139� �� Fr2 71 :31 Ftt� 'FPrap EYteclr tvurnbe?r ��ri �-em p. rne�u ;vumbPr ti+er�r�c,i^ fda�ne :71! H!'}CH L LtQ7bP_ i^ 2h 7ota] s 7emp L•Y�eck NcrrnbEr 'Ten�p �r�eax ;vu�ir_+eJ^ �:!;., �� 7ne.mas hne�Y,t� :?:., Thc+m�s lSrrutl� ;=^'..� 3hcimas ?tr�crYJ� 7� Tata35 7r>mp Ctx:cx fVumt+et^ temp �neck NurnNer •�5 �.� ftodet Arch L�r^atr�+ LTfS ;= 6 T'c�ta3s 7emp Ohc_cH Svtintber Te�rp �Yrecsc rlurnber •,�7 :=? L9.S13e Subu7^ban News :?"! L 1 2 t 1 e 3u27t+1^bdrf 7vews L7' i2]].3P. 9ttbttY`b�l» IVP.WS --- +' �': .� . ' . _ • . . . �2 .- ' ?cta2s_�7efnp Check 7vc�mt�ei^ !� Tem�+ �hec}ts 1Jurnber` � •� i=$ . �S T13»nesata Lacks 2S Tota3s Terap �f�c:c:X tvumi�er 7em}7 �t�eck Number �=`3 ��3 M f4 F�ssac9ates �s h1 A Assacl et es �'� 1�? � Fi5SCC1c7Y.P5 $7 7ata t s Tem�+ II17PCH JV+.�mbe�^ letnp �»ecu Numt+er 38s s�r r�arr. s n rec Y/5 ] 3 S'E2r �� Tc t,� 2 s 7�rap i�.t�erH Nun�bei^ ___ ._..__._-- r-----�--- ------ • --- - - - V LSalrns L]st . .. ^ � �1 ty oT N]�ndczt� Me1 ot7ts Rccc.unY. �ade a'+Y -•'i:nkh� -�.ti3t'+•-Jk'+ �4 ff 3-•i�+ i :�-tP.+CC L.'+-fI+2+ 3r3-'r9; '_:_.�t43•-2� b'J'�if �I i J- S Lt �- i aJ ��u' -9:?�= �A-•�2�4�-•tZ��C+ �� Y+1 -93L.''�3-Ps�.Q+-:�� 2t3 -'93tZ7✓-12+7i'+-'7'Q+ 1 J-�i.�.lQ J-Q .F.�¢�"Gl� i'3 m� -�,�za¢+-•m��-�.�a 3ff+ f'�}j.,- _ i., , r <.J �age 8 +'=` ._,.=,! :��'� i . - '_} �amrnents Fitnactnt . ., � ; m1 sc sF,1 ys :2 ��. ,� . �� ^a .� pr^o� n:ite+age ' 1v:c.65 . � r nil2eane • • - 33, �£ ^� P " ',3 �a3 sc m1 I e.age _ . . _ 1. 3Y _ .. . . .. 1 - 1 :JF1. ia� c . �f � 'j ». . ., ) Re F•at^;r snei ter, �� . -. ; , :�31r_ 3� . • t ',?, :�3+i. 38 . , , ' ,. t � ' �'' ' r . custcdtan aC 2;=.ffiP: '•-S CItS$Odlcll4 cld '�oL 1.�2�i�Q�� „a .. -� . , . custodlan �d •�c.¢Q� ! , .. • ' . . .: . ., '_'--• .'�J..... -. t� - ._ _. ._..._ . ... 86. D+¢ h� � ..��„f:. i. . . . . . �. . ' ' l .. -. . _. .. c , � _ j -"� \� �f.�. ._ 1'•.. .ls ' f. = h ... . A L: " 4n c . r . .• ._ dtt�2 ke.ys ;�. Y+8 `•� � 3. �hu 3 1 spi ys +rF.,. 8¢ � . � spS ys 95. 8'+L� sp] ys �r6. 54� r 14Q�. +t� t s � Re �ar^2oc;r 372.Q+. ffiQ+ 3i'[.�:+. L.'�L.'. �' � _ . �,,- . , .. : . _ . .. 1� Jir2 2�'34R �ia�rns List � - _. . ='�, Fr2 94:�1 AM L.3Ly of ;*e:�rC,rt�x Neig:>ts 7era� �t�eox Nurnuer iii+ Tentp. '�:7P.: 7: ' Ncrrn�er venGc�r^ Name Frccc�u»Y, Lc�Ge �s� Tvta1 � i'e.rnp �;�ecx :ct�mner N�+ aern{� �t��ck 7vumbPr � . �+1 . � �47 �•ea: J�;arwictc Tta3r� c4 �o �2-v��Q+-13t�•-�ib - 44 Feat 1�arw.tcH i�,31i^r tF �o {L��'4(y7�-'iJTb-'�:1 , �r3 fieaT 1?ar^w2 cX Ma3 n S• £.•c� �:,-•4 ;=� -1 3Yt�•-S7� 43 Peat t0.3r^W1 ck h1a 1�7 l� �r rA3-4�� h-9 3Yh-'tiSQi ii1 r-'e�it f+fa>^w1c:c J�fa2n 8• �a 3Y�-ri;�cf�--13S;-k�12 9,". T P_ e�t Mcil^W1 C1-f t'�e'1:17 iL �c L?y -4L?�S-'13�•-'Qr.�.^+ 9� fiea� :�l�rw]r_x Ma3r� :i� P.o 9%,r-4�}�?-93Y+-a'�a ' 9; fi��T f�a�^W.t r. k i�t� 1 r� &�n 1 6•-9Z'K'_r2+-•:t 3�•-•�2+ - 3:?c� Tatals �errlp �ner_1: Nuurber^ 4:2 7en�� 7r;1�: ck 7vtrmber 3 4'� _� • tl� FLii712C crnp2 RPt HSSYt L�+1=i'f��14 ' 4i 'Fc*tals S�rn� �f�ec^k ;vumbe�^ 4�� YPr,�p �necH • Nurnber �� ' 43 ' ' . - . 93 Rufi'- �Ci�t.'= �s'�� .1 �11�-499p+-g+4�-•�4L'i �:;;� .Cy 43 - Tc�tR1s 7t�rap i;hvck 7dctrnbe�^ ri3 i'e�np �hecX�� Nurnt�er �.'.v . fi4 ',i'? .'� �4 4ti 5'.,:f�� T L'sPi']ce F'1'CdtlC�s 2�2-/s:i&?.�i-t�+L�`IIl=�'-`+..'� •?• " __ . , .' � .i.k'-' ... . , .�: � . ,l_ 111/ Tatats itatdp �fiack tvunJL�er 49 7ernp �hecle Nerrnber^ tr� +�:� 3 i 9h9.e2ey �a 8�1-44��,?-Si:.h'�-:�i'� 8✓ - ?'ata3s 7en7p �Y�erk tvc+mber 43 'S'em{� �hecx 1Vtttnbf.l` ri5 tJ6 �tate Ti-Pasurei^ Ye�:I-�3�:� +fL :JY.E?tE-' it`Be75Gt1^P.1^ 7`..r`-•�32� 96 9�at� 7't^easuret^ �1-3F1✓ 1 3�s Tot�ts TFm{3 '�Y�c:ck tu�rnlber �r6 Larnrnent s baiance a�+[�it 1'Pe • bc?ictl'tC.P c7Lit3:'L iE'P ba2arrce auQit Tee brit i 2t17CP au[71 t TeB nalance atlG.it Pee • t�a1a»r.e az+dit Tee . balance auett•.Tee :Jc�latl7CP_ Ettldl•� iL'B � - Ju2 pr�en7 -- •- � fi� je S ,. F'amc�urt ._�. s¢: y5.:�. f'+4.� 3 ?�. Y+tT ] :�✓. LhQr � J�J. Qt� .:�3. 'L!�4''+ :i3_ 4^�2+ � 19. 4+�'+ 4E3✓, i2�� • • 'c��'it'J�. {dL� - .'::'weEd Cl.t$'t1n1] ,._i' .t,+ ; r� 3$.:�. Q+'4'e _ ... 3$.:i. �'ri2+ m � : .. u . _ ... *:;...�- .r � ., ..sp]ys �,c�� , . . ..•u.i : . • 1sq.�+� ' � . � , - •>�. . . --•-•-•-•-• � . � � , ' 1 15. 'P.�72� cI1� xey 94. :17 34_ .:s? 2YrCl C.�iT' SlCi1L_]_S i�z 5��. 6✓ i�i'7L7 Cjtl^ SlC1�DS 1Y.�4� .=nd qtr c: c»g� 1�6.:��r.r ; s .:,3:=, b� ..- • -• - - - --- - ....- -- ---- - -- 4' : 1 , . , ..,_�' .. ._ . . �,:a� . ' � 13 Ju1 �9�+ �1a2rns List �, - _, ,-. - , � : . fiage E. �r,•? ___,i _.. - Fr1 21::31 s�n rsiy aT Mendata Nelghts �, • - Tetn,�s i:Y�eck Ntt7AbLt^ 31 Temp. �r�ecn )VcuaL�er Vendai^ ;Jame FHccoc�»t �c�de .�� Med Ceret�rs fi � Vs2=�i:�r .1 Y2Q �P.YrtPt^S J•1 ;- 4ri-�4131-11i�+-1T2+ :31 tOPc3 T:Pr.t ers f-f 1= V+1 -•97 3Y ••�F+;�-�c_� 31 rfPd iPnters H�^ ffi--4131-2+4�i,-•+�Y �� Med ��e�ot er-s rr P • Y� 2-•41:31 --�h:�m-• �+z� 3s rted �errt ers f9 f-^ Y91 -%a:f 31 -i�7t2+--7t� 3Y Metl L'errtei^s H� Y��-•4131-�7�+�-•]:s 31 ?tled L'errters ti F fc+�s--ir335-12Q>Z-}I+r2s 31 Med �eanters f9 fi 1.�•-•4131--O+E�•-[�h r379 T«Ya15 Ternp C;�eck 14UIi7L�P.1^ 32 7emc+ i:Yrerk ivunlber 32 3:'� Metrc YJ�sTe T'aT,trc2 5�-4443-�c�G+2�-St, .. 3i- M�trcz t.�J�rste Co»trai 1�-3C�1:1 ' c4 ' , Foi:a2s 3ernFt �t�ec7r 7Vtrrnber 3'� � 7e�i�fa Ct�ecft 1vun�txer 3:i �.s Mir]west 9i>�en Ser^v2ce �D7-4�3II+-�2�2+tL+-�0 �J . . 7�La35 T�:rnp �trc:rk tJ+�n�ber �t3 TPfRjJ �t�eck Nurnber 3�r 34 M223er fir2nti.ng - -- L�.:,-� ;Q�7t+-•1e2:�-13 -•,� .... �.... 7ji )+!1 2 2 Pr fir1 nt 1 ng .._, 1:�-43�Z+-•12+6¢+-E,Y� _, .,. t�t? ('.. . r � . ' ,�' .� . � , . i�� :- Tcta.is 3'ern� �t�ecu Numt�er 34 TP.MFI �]7P.Ck 7vr.rrat�er 3:� . �3 t�ti »r, �`c•3 2 ce Recru2 t.ment 8ystern Y+3 -��ih-•�Z;=¢-;��2+ �✓ TOCciZS 7P.n7�J krhPCH TVLfR7bP_1^ �� Temp �}7eck Nun�ber 3v " ;f, ]Vat^therri �tat•P ?-'`ower^ 4+1-4�=i;}-3I;�-�� 36 tuartr�ern 9t.�tP Pawer- tLt1--v�1�-•32m-'�2+ 36 Nc.r^Y,hern :3TatP �ower^ �1•-4:_1;�-31�b-7� 3E� 7V_nr�tt�ern SYate �awer 9`i•-421z•-�31cc`+•--b2+ .',6 Nc.rtf-ier-n StatP ficwer a'.Y-4�.�1;=-3;�:�•-•7i'� . , _ .. . ; 'i CommPnt, s fimacu�t: ,--t Y/Lf C3 pr�em 9 S 4y3. .r� Fiu� {�rem S:JG. E`r ; ,, Rug �+�^em 1 � 331?. �h�% � Aug prem - - �:�a5. i�+it+ - . t�ug prern - _ �. � z.� . ��7.1Z�:� �. . : �) feug prPrn 4��. E�T+ �ur� prern � 779. E�:b . � f-iug prem 1�9.62• `� . Ftug p;^em �;Y i 4¢>�.6i2+ , . . • IT %47c.. 6� ' . ,� ` - - • - - � ) �. Jun sac c»gs . . 3i 6�1+�+. l�+Z+ , . Jtt» sac chgs :3E,. Z�4+c�^ , - - -•-•--•-----•• ,..� � , . - 3� :�6 i. d`+2r . , . �. � � .. -" � -- , JUS rntcYr - - - bc.. 9IIr •• + . •:.} • � _ � - . ..- .,.. t -•--•--• , .. r .: �•. _ ��.. �4YL. .t' , , , ., � i.� ��.��. , ,. .._� . .. ,�,.-_t; �7 . ._ Spy �,5 .. _ • -• -•- . - '73. �tt _ . . Y swt^ i^ecei pt : boaHs � = .. .. :13+Yr. YnY+ , � � t.u.�. . . ._it ------ � . ._ .�� c-il.. � ' . �: :. , , - F ... . � E>5�9. L!+� . . - , .<. � :�_: ' -- . _ o �-: , '.: . " ,_ , - i . � fie fjarlock 7:�a'�.��2. 7�Y.>2+�2s , . � .Yui svc 3Y. �9 .fic�3 svr_ ��e7. TE .Scii svc ��, iF � Ju1 swc 3£�.7� .F t� 3 svr +r 1. 5;= .?. . � 2 3 ,i'tt 3 :! 99c.'+ � fri 2 s n;1 Rt+J 7emp LhP_CH rvc�mbc:r 3� Y ern p. �r.ecft Number Ve.r�dat^ ;Va�ne ;96 Nc*rCnF+�^n �tate finwtar 16 ;VarY.her�Yi �4ste fiowei^ 3t.. ]Ca�^ther^n 9ta�P fic+we7^ 'ti fVc�r^thei•» 9tat� �c�wer^ 3& faartr�e�r^r. 3L�tc: fiowe�^ 3S 1VGt^tf'�Brn StatE+ Fcwer^ 3t� 1VCrt'l:J7PY'YT 9tc'2�P �4WEY` s? 3c^ Tota2s Yernp t;Y�eck tJcrrnbPr 7an�p L:nFck� 1Vur:7Der • 3'! 37 Nor^ttier» 9tate fiawer 37 ldarthc:t^n SL�ate Fower �7 tVc�r^tJ�r:>^n StatP ficYwe>^ 37 fCc*rThErrr 9tate fio+n+��^ � 1 NGY'YhPt`Yi JtatL �awer 19�� •'" `' .� Tcta25 TenJ{:+ i�t�Pck h:umbc:r TBhTjJ C:�eck 1Vurnber 3a ._ .i'_ � 35 n;c.rwes't AarrK Mpi s 3� 'tCat•west L�anH Mpl s _": ` .s8 lV�.rw�st E,a»k 7dpis 7t'J NOY'WESt L'�BYrX M�,72S _ - � S Nc.rwes t � a»x td p2 s 3ti 1Vo7^WBSt L��3Yik 1+1p15 3S Nc.7^avest E�a»k Mp25 Jtj roarwest Ba»7< Mpl s 38 Ncrwest f+a»k t�p2s 30 lVaY�wPSt t+anH Mp15 38 tVol�west Sr�nk Mp2s 3f� 1Vor�wPst Etank Mpl s �� Ycta2s Tem¢ �heck Nurnbe�^ Tenr� �t�c:tk fVumbet^ 39 33 tJarwest Panfe Mpl s _ 39 roorwest Far�k Mp2s 35 7Vct^w�"st E+ar�k Mp2s 3 1 ': icta]s Fea�{s �J�eck �v�+mber Fernp �hpcx Nurnbc.r- iiL?+ �rt2 t3xygcn 9ervice La �1a1m5 L15t ,. . : ��• • - . L2ty cT t+re»dota }±e�ghts Taccc�u»t Lc��e 2 �-4�,� 2 �� •-•4*X: V� -�F �2'+ F b -•4'� S � -tC�t2 c'�-i9�'� Y+Y •'4t? 2 1 -.. � ] :� •-3t3 Q+� - 4� 3 1-32 tZ -�Yi Y+2 -•48 : s -•31 th-`.'Y+ 1 ✓•-fi'21•1 -� i Y+-Eii2 L�H-fic^Y 9 -•QrinQ�-rhS+ 36 1�.i -�+'c 1 1 -•..'�it21f'�-;.�L� iT2 -•4c^1 1 -•4��Q'+-G'iL"r �+5-%!'i 11 -cf1�2'��'-it+:2+ L�+i ^?ti 2 1-•3�.�h-7Ch 2.:✓•-4:?5 2 --ifiZib-S1T 37 3:✓-%+f�:✓E-¢i.'+P ^•�I �21 3'3-'4:.?'26-'2+L.'i6'+-'�2Y+ . ....... 31 -44� 6-��i�-ff iZ 32 -•4'?_'ct3--IIrt2ffi-m'+4+ - _ , . ]=4'� •-4�r.:�fi�-i>Q i?-'�Rt �:�-�4� 4 ✓E+-S�Q��-ff�t.3 'i12+-+1i_"S�E�-4+{2�C! "Vi�t`t �h2-22Y� 8�1 -12:� 2 fs�-Y4:�✓""Q+ihQ+�2+k'+ 1 ri-94�E-2+�2+2+-��2+ 1 y-4L�'F_'Fi-Y+Y�t21-'Q+4r 38 � t{—'HtiJJ—QI�P��iZ+ 4 4-•�I+l✓E�-'OtZ�N-'tAtY+ 14 -4 P�,= E -c:+�+i.?� -� 13 33 tZ�1 -43�+¢-p, �k'�-.+� �or,7me»t s .rtt1 svc Sui svc JL72 SVC Jtrl svc Ju.1 svc: .:u3 sva ..7�7.1 S4'C . Jui svc •; Ttj2 54'C � Jt�l svc Jtt2 svc , Ju1 svc ' .s - 93 btls - - '„ . .t' �9 77d5 ',. `Ji bds � ' �__E37 bd5 � 75 bCs .. , � . 79 bOs T3 bds bd pymts bd pytnts %L= 'bCiS 72 bds 72 bds 7.:i bds 7v bUs i�i bd5 cy1 2 r�s p F,�ge 7 �im�.ctnt � �. k�¢i itE•. 3� 43r3. � 5 1f��=G i J��. LEa 1:.r3. ;_^? :�2L....�. Y: CO:.7�h b'� 3. � ,? � 14Y+. 4� 1s 263. 3� • J� r �� 43s. iE •,?, �75. 9is �:}� Q+343.. 'At� f��. 2� . •��i 4 . :✓�!3 i3tZ. �+tt ." . c'+Z•'�t. i2:�.'+ s s, ��,. �¢. Y s F_� 3 3. :�Yt ��. �$ 3'z Lht2�¢+. YOQ� . 3:35 �+¢+�:. L.'+�cr 2;a7 Y�t�r�. Y�+2+ 5�r6_ c^:1 �Y�. Q�4+ 1 �7� +2+G9. m:t �.:�. tt'+52� : r. a J� a . � 13 Str3 1:J`_it.'+ . Pt^ � :i Y �31 t-�17 FE+1Jli7 rYtE'CH ?4ttIr72"�. E.+7` r17 i'El3F%, Ff�ecx 1Vc�lnbnr VP»ticr^ 7Game %+7 �t rr_ 1 c»e�••s 4i Tc.La1s 3ernp i:f�er_k Numt�er^ 1P_hl�.'+ fhBCk }VUfiTbEt` 4P1 �3 Se+n News�apers %�[i Ji�n ]Vewsp�p�rs '_�fa :'uta3s Ter;lp �heck tvurnr,er TemF, �»ecH Ni�rniser� . 43 �ij L� 9 West �c�mrnt+�J3r_at,2c�ns 49 i� S L1est x:.arnmui�i c�L 2 oi�s tr3 Lt 9 We�t f-arnmurr3cett2nrs %r9 L� :9 West z«n7u�i��ir_atsons ; 9F� . . TCLa2s 'fernp �hecf: Ncrin_her Tera� �trroc7t 7VLtlAL�P_1^ �a3 :h� Ur�2fcrms ttnllm�tetl a� , Tr_.z��s Tero�r i:t�eck tVc+nrber ;�aa•� �rancJ 7c..ta] ---- •- - .__r_ �...,._ . ._ . . ' 'G ._. '" �1alrns 2_3�st . t: .�,r:_'. ' i ti•i__; i.1ty o� l�:eiaclar.a t9e�lgtrt•s acca+.�»t �acfe t2�Y-'cYPI �7 �1 -4•24�-a'�8�.'+-5 � �7 -v��.�-�$¢�-•ea �S f'+3 -4;z] t2�-k'�;�'+2+-.�''L•, . 2'..`.-•Yc:t �h-•k'+6�'•C�� i7.:1 -•4;�1 Y1+-L.4�iiC -�St'l+ tbY --4'?_ ] E�-'Q+l�+•^ i � 43 i, 'r2�1 -441 t2+•-�2+�-`r�'?-:�T.+ JQ� � Lomrnerrt s SP175C�1^ r , _, � h1^c Y.ot Ft^1 �ah' .. h�`t3 1?4"�� :7�jCrti�-r1R1 . [t. , _. . ' fic7i]2 � h"... _ . � !d1.{ i . � ' - � Frn7c�trrrt . ,•-� 3<_19. �i:!t __...._._� r.� '..°.��J. '.JI� ' .,) ., ,. �� .•i 1:�. 3+i �8.3'S �- . .��Y :vr _t, `'r . , . } ) Ju2 svc - ]s1.64 ,: rul svc . .. 32�3. e'�7 . - .--. ptil svc 2%r. �:5 � Jti 1 svr. , • r ]�r, 3i! _ , _� �. . • . ' ' '}:1�+. i=7 . .. `c,� � , . . � -�.. .. .» � . , . . , . . • .�J rnisc tiar2acX ; 1��+�,_^:..,, 2�.: ,. ; . . - -•------•-^-• �� . . ; ��.C�,-� 1��'�:i.97Z+ ' , ��.. 1• .�_ . � n .✓. _�.1 . _f C��—. ._' .. . ' . . y � �.��.��..��.��. _. a � - � 12725 5.50 Dept Public Safety 12726 758.04 Co�rical AsphaZt 12727-73Z 550.00 Softba2l Umpires 7/12 913.54 G.T. .Z,185,490.77 i,aa4,:,�'-r.�a ` � , Dup1 title %e rec/rock discount r 1 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEZGHTS MEMO July 12, 1990 �a TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrato FROM: James E. Danielson, Public-Works Dire Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assi SUBJECT: Case No. 90-19: Delta Environmental Consultants CUP - Amoco Station Accessory Structure DISCIISSION The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their June meeting to consider an application from Delta Environmental Consultants to construct an accessory structure to house the equipment necessary to clean up the ground water contaminated as a result of leaking underground gas tanks. There was no public present at the meeting. b RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend granting the Conditional Use Permit subject to the following conditions: 1. That the structure meet the setback requirements. 2. That the buildings be used only for pumping for the treatment of ground water. 3. That the building be removed after the treatment is completed. ACTION REQIIIRED Conduct the public hearing. If Council desires to implement the Planning Commission's recommendation, they should pass a motion. adopting Resolution No. 90 - ,"RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AT 2030 DODD ROAD (AMOCO STATION)". � NOTE: Staff suggests that an additional condition be imposed to provide for the establishment of a quarterly sanitary sewer rate. NOTE: Delta Environmental has submitted documents on water sampling, Minnesota Storage Tank Program and Aquifer pumping that we have not included in your packets. They will be available at the meeting or on file at City Hall should you wish to reveiw them. JED/KLB:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL IISE PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY STRIICTIIRE AT 2030 DODD ROAD (AMOCO STATION) WHEREAS, Delta Environmental Consultants has made application for an accessory structure to house the equipment necessary to clean up the ground water at 2030 Dodd Road; and WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 26, 1990 to consider the application for construction of said accessory structure; and WHEREAS, based upon the public record transcribed on June 26, 1990 the Mendota Heights Planning Commission recommended to the Mendota Heights City Council that the Conditional Use Permit be approved conditioned upon: 1. That the structure meet the setback requirements. a 2. That the buildings be used only for pumping for the treatment of ground water. 3. That the building be removed after the treatment is completed. WHEREAS, an additional condition be imposed to provide for the establishment of a quarterly sanitary sewer rate; and WIiEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on July 17, 1990 to consider Delta Environmental Consultant's application. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will have no adverse effect on the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the community and the surrounding land; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that construction of said accessory- structure not be adverse to the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Conditional Use Permit for an accessory structure be approved according to the plans submitted and upon the above mentioned conditions. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17th day of July , 1990. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By C�iarles E. Mertensotto, Mayor � e a 0 �- �r CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 19, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dir Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assi �J'"» SUBJECT: Case No. 90-19: Delta Environmental Consultants - CUP for Accessory Structure in B-2 Zone DISCUSSION Delta Environmental Consultants are representing the Amoco Station, 2030 Dodd Road, in their request for an accessory structure in a B-2 Zone. The accessory structure is being proposed as part of a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) treatment system to clean up the site because of gas5leakage from the old underground storage tanks. The accessory structure would house a recovery well to pump and treat groundwater, remove the gas and discharge the water into the sanitary sewer. An accessory structure in a B-2 Zone requires a CUP (13.2(4)). The City and Amoco will need to come to an agreement on sanitary sewer charges for the water this treatment system will discharge into the sanitary sewer system. ACTION REQUIRED Conduct the public hearing and make recommendations to the City Council on any conditions on the requested CUP allowing an accessory structure within a B-2 Zone. JED/KLB:kkb � y � �i PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION RE�UESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 26 June 1990 90-19 Delta Environmental Consultants Amoco Station 2030 Dodd Rd. CUP to permit an accessory structure other than a private _ garage in a B-2 district. 1. The applicant is proposing to construct a 12 foot by 14 foot accessory structure on the Amoco Station site at Dodd Road and Highway 110. The purpose of the structure is to house the equipment necessary to complete ground water and soil decontamination that resulted from a leak in an underground fuel storage tank. The tank has since been removed and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) requires the station owners to remedy the soil and ground water contamination to meet MPCA standards. The proposed structure is intended to be insulated and heated in order to allow the the clean-up pcocess, which involves pumping ground water to the surface for� treatment, to continue during the winter months. According to the applicant, this could shorten the process by up to two years. 2. This facility would qualify as a permitted accessory use in the B-2 zone under Section 13.3(2) in the current ordinance. Si�ce the proposed accessory structure and equipment are part of a processing operation that is deemed mandatory by the MPCA, they can be considered necessary to conduct the permitted principal use, in this case, the service station. However, accessory structures other than private garages in a B-2 district require a Conditional Use Permit under Section 13.2(4). 3. In this particular instance the proposed use is an interim or short-term use whose life terminates when the remediation procedure is complete. According to the applicant, its difficult to determine with any accuracy how long the soil and ground water clean up process will take since there are many unknowns involved. However, he stated that a reasonable estimate would be 3 to S years, assuming the structure is permitted allowing the facility to operate during the winter. Recent legal precedent in Minnesota suggests that Co�ditional Use Permits ride with the land and cannot be set up to terminate at a given date. The concern here is that the structure could be utilized for some other purpose, e.g., used tire storage, after the environmental remediation is completed and the applicants equipment removed. From a practical standpoint, the station operator would probably want use of the surface area for parking vehicles for repair etc. and would want the structure removed when the clean-up process is completed. We believe there is a better method by which to permit this use and control the potential for lR rj Delta Environmental Consultants, Case No. 90-19 Page 2 reuse of the structure after the remediation process is completed. In 1989, State legislation was passed which established the authority for cities to permit interim uses if they meet the following four criteria: 1. The use conforms to the zoning regulations; 2. The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty; 3. Permission of the use will not impose additional costs on the public if it is necessary for the public to take the property in the future; 4. The user agrees to any conditions that the governing body deems appropriate for permission of the use. 4. With respect to criteria 2, 3, and 4 the following can be said, "The event that will terminate the use is the completion of ground water and soil remediation. Regarding criteria number three -- since the investment in the structure itself and the concrete basi� is minimal this is of little concern. The fourth criteria would obviously be a condition of the approval and would be negotiated with the applicant:' 4. 'vVith respect to the first criteria we offer the following comm��ts: 4 The location of the structure as indicated on the site plan provided by the applicant is closer than the required 5 feet from the rear property line. As we scale the setback off the drawing it appears to be approximately 4 feet. We certainly see no reason why the structure can't be moved toward Dodd Road one foot to meet the setback requirement. The use requires the nearly constant pumping of water, which may result in unusual noise or vibration, is limited by the performance standards in the ordinance. The standards require that any noise produced by the use meet the minimum requirements established by the MPCA and that no vibration be perceptible beyond the property line. Generally, these standards are more applicable in situations where the regulated use is near more sensitive land uses such as residential. The subject property is located in a business district and is isolated from the nearest commercial structure, a McDonald's restaurant, by at least 140 feet. Our final concern with respect to this use is the emission of fumes and the potential for combustion as a result of the process of removing petroleum contaminants from the ground water and soil. In our discussion with Mr. Kurt Geiser, an engineer and representative of Delta Environmental Consultants, we raised the question regarding the potential for explosion or combustion of the fumes emitted from the vent stack. He stated that the emissions are regulated by the MPCA and represent virtually no danger of explosion or combustion. 5. The process also includes discharging the treated ground water into the City's sanitary sewer system where it is subject to the additional treatment at the local sanitary sewage treatment plant. This issue was discussed with Mr. Gieser at the May 21st office hours and he assured the staff that the water quality of the discharge is tested and regulated by the MPCA. He was also made aware that the applicant or property owner would be responsible for paying the SAC charge for use of the n, � \ ; Delta Er+vironmental Consultants, Case No. 90-19 Page 3 City's sewer system and a method of monitoring the discharge was determined. Mr. Danielson can probably offer more detail regarding this matter. 6. Clearly the remediation of ground water and soil contamination is in the best interest of the City and its residents. It is also clear that any reasonable accommodations that can be offered to facilitate the earliest possible completion of this process should be permitted. While the Conditional Use Permit process could be used to permit the accessory structure, we believe the interim use statute offers the City a better alternative for the reasons discussed above and should be examined and implemented if possible. We recommend the City's Attorney be consulted as to his opini�n regarding this matter. � � �'�:;,:;;�'`��'?`' .�� =� ��1 ` �`, � � � '. �i j�. E �� ....... ' f 'Y:)" �� ' � `;,,�, :: �W �,�: s . , i` G ;< . , --� '%'.:1 �.y:; ... � , �.,. ; . i. , . . . . . c :' � \ 9{ � •; i �.� •� . . -=- ' - �� q�4 _ =� t i � \ ` . � ' f i � ♦ � ; _ _ • � ! _ _ . t • � � \ / . " I � • • _.., ' 1 _ 1 �� . . � J +' `� P ,F_-�� v • `. t�:�� T , 4'� , 1 ♦, � . � �Y � N .,I w� ~� � �'�'- "�'�� . . , �: ''�, . �..,��. . * �f � .� � � / ' � � -! ". I� W . � •, Rn t ---- - � �� j ; + • . • I r + . ' W! � � i r/ ��' i � _' �.�,,, ' • _ _ . _ t `1i •.! j♦ .. _ _ �� -- '-s'�, . . r , a t �' ' . , - T \•��' , _ MENpC7A �1EtGMTS � / !� � * �� \ PAR 3 G04F COURSE • • f T � �� o`� � —� t auS�aCa t �'� i � - . ! +� . � i,�, Y a �' _ d Y / � , � . ; ,;�� _�. . ., � , �- ; 2 _ : Q ° i , � f:; • ' • '; •� • ' ' ! ,,` c* A • �� . 3 .�•'�; � � �—�� : �� •� `� '� � � _ � • ` ` �• •• ... � � , _ . . w �. �. r . .'�r' r�s r,.� i.i_. ._ ; .iC � � t� y , �, i �'I J . ' . • __._._ l / /; �` � ` � • T r ' _..» `� __ • . • / � ( � , '/ I i I 1 ' , I . 1' '... � - �-1 l-•--� • F..� MARIE � � "` '/ . . . � 0 1 __, • . . ' _... AvEM £ �- � f - a ` �1 - .. °�� .�T'. � �r r . ' : . �,_, . I \ � • PARlC !-__ � , /,i ....�_.`�uC+ci.ea�L �!' � � � � ioa l N � - --- �--- - -�-�j 'j' < • ` �S'� . {' ! • �� .�fir _. _ la'/� � � •�^% � `• • ( � � � . 1 t i1'%�..ss•G�RClE t /' • � ,� � - � - I NU �� o„� � �:� � ! � � 1 � \�' .� • ` . . � ' " 't'. �,..� --- � m � 1 • w • - . � _ ._ .i '- � eo � x'a / * 5 , ( • c • ' i � I � i r ' • � � j � , � �—f , � � >' .. . .a =� 1( L ,�` • ` . _ �, � YIU � Y � . • • OV ` �// .L. ~� + .�`�_ • 1 � �. .� _�- *� � � ;� , - , • � _.�_.. . ^ f �l � 2 / � rAGEF ' j{ • . . � � f .' • �� CT � ' • 1 �1, {-i i0'� � � � s� ��. ` • ` ,� = COuni 7 � ./'� f�• �� •� y —• . : - ��'' �� SV iU ;1 L,_ ' � SxU � ' �� + E_�__,-r__r.__, ' I. � ��" ,�„�1R � , � . �, ... . � ' � �: t. W . - r ,,.� ' ' � � , ' - , . _ , ME �.Mt Y� : +; � , • r � . � T--, --, j -- ,a �� . . - . .� ; � .';I/ � • ; i E ' �. 1 _ � � �.' - --• u' . �) ' /' * . v r ' Q� . ' � + _ U . ��..�,� * .,.��y ---- i . � t . `�a�a; �_ 1 ; , „r "" ' 1 `��",,,, �r- "�r - -!-`- , • //�, W ~ • � � • • � � • • • � 1 � _, t J • ` . - � • . . 1 � � . � � � �� M, . • t % � � _;�K � � , � � r ..�., � . . . . � f • i � • ��,. � � • _' � ,'(��q','�F., , . • _ . . . - i : %l� � � �� — � nSo � �- � ' � . ��i{. a. �' � � ` f Y , i. � �. l _,/'"� r% =_' / / �� '^• — ��._ I �.�- I �-'- o ` I � • � . "--` "^�_:-�. ��._. --- C�__�__.� ' — -_.'--- --- ' --� �.•-._...- . _-.� '. -:i'7��^�._ �� - _ ..._. . �' - ._._ �_. `_ -�..._--�.w ' - - ��1i - =--- =_--=- � w- �-�-.- - - -=--- j�t % S T A E F4 1 G W A Y A � �� .M '.:;c n '_-_ '� �I , ' � � ` %'%:� A t `_ �,{ :. �g fI , � � � • a • f `"�� ' J � I � i;j.r'l,` / I I ' I At- �%"j�/ r� , MENOAKOTA GO�F COURSE � COUNTRY CLU6 ;� , .� � ! \ � � w l� ' i /, j !� � J 1 �; j � �� ( PRIVATE ) � 5 ; ;+; SUBJECT PROPERTY , ---- r �' t � '� f � � � �' NORTH T ; �.. -- - - �'i� - _-` '';, _.� �-�'' ' =- SCALE 1"=800' � _ �__..._ _ /, �v - • ... ■ . I • � t'f _ A � ' �_�� _ ....-. � � + � ` y " � ' •T'"�7- nl � .! , '•;`s::"'.� ( } a\ . �_ i1R[ N�ll •jr • yZ� • ' 1 � � � •" � L f � . -t +��` �'.i�:... � � � � L� .- ' � � i ~ , �� -.�- � �- . t ��y�-. �'/ • ' t`� r! � . % � _ - ' + � • �`^� • �co ��.�/ 1 I' �� • �e • S: \ . ---;�_.' ,, :� r� .= � r.__ . �,:�� . ';� .. ti _- �� ,.�v '�! „ r � � ��K,�'f.�';f,�� `� �• ; i _ M� _ - „ . '� , . � ��;,.. . ,,' ; • ; � ~ ' \ � , "�� - = _ .� . \�;��./ ��----- r } � i , � � J ,�" r ` . � ' — -- o��»£�« � � �� I � �--_ . � S...Ei �m.E- L Q`y ,� �• y 6 i ----•--o.. _ _ . �ue.s.,�,.,. ---3 e� - --- 1 �*� C MUN1wENH �AT �U+/GN �U �� -- - . . _ jj:-� .. .�__ r_ � M� - _ � f ��. _ - .. "� �� R T j — _ . _., .�- . i •� ='��sstltr vaasn ; f----.� � y� i _ . \ : "� � " � � ! ' • • a � � �. 'r" �L' " vi x vl i .. _ .i � � :. ' '�.� . _� ,�.' f' f, �''.,�� " . PaRt( i � .:a i . ,aa .. .r .». _ i •'`Y• , � 1 T'� • . � v, 3! � N � � o L � I 7 Z� ' a S ' �l h s� � N . v ��v Z Z � �Q� �p ° ss z °a " Z9 n1 ` � '4 R � � G O � 7 . 1 L J � Z S � 0 "� O L4g 3 _ . 2 ,9 . d" h %A1 z/ � Z 1 � " , :, o o �/ op ?G C ? 'S;. Z 4 N .. ,o ,�y '.�' �4 k• , _ �� :. �s Z 2 Z` ,,� • I /G o z �. Q,� `• m m ��w; 1 \ �i N'•� 8 \ ♦ '9 �1OGE PLACE' � �J `;'"J ?�� O�'�\O ; : 33� � O �- �• �� i P� i y �a7 . o � s•��` �i 0 Zs � e.�• �09 � ,w � a y �, � 8 ° -° T" 3 �' � ,4, e y q. , x o .� Z S � ,� Gi � 9 � ho c I50 �Zy JL � h Za Q� o / E�.� 2�y oz � � O y z e� o %, 1 /f 2 Z Qi "� o � 2 2• � �M�..r'..`— r — � — / /93,Z � n+� �a �' h� y u' r / FREEYVAY Bi U 3 ,9; md F�sch� 3 _`�' .�l �' 2Co •�44-e J ..a co �a9's:ioti . i � J I •-- - — - - - - __ _— - - — � I ' 228.81 � S 89°44'25�E � 'l0 • ,yy `�d v6 o�h 'S` I ` � � "S� SUBJECT PROPERTY � - ' :�`;k.,.. °o S.. i :: :::... ....:::.. � I �� , ��:�:��_��:;`�� S90 NORTH T I�►� � c.''r�:'i::� �'•cc•'�4 v�'� "OS SCALE 1"-200' � , ; .�:�;::-:� � � - S `IQ 8q ? � �/ � j �� q��2�.,E � " � � _� � �, P 0 � �_�h Q �� 0 �° N 3 E M � I N � 2 A N � LA P � , � C ity o� .�.,�, j 1Viendota. Heights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. Q � � �� Date of Application - - Fee Paid lO-�I-40 _ .-��n.(7(� 02� �" ApplicantName: Delta Environmental Consultants PH: 636-2'427 (I.ast) (F'u�st) (NII) Address: 1801 Highway 8, Suite 114, St. Paul, 2�IN 551],2 (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) OwnerName: �Oco Station #5317 (I.ast) Address: 2030 Dodd Road (F'ust) (IvII) Mendota Heights 55120 (Number & Street) (City) ;, (State) (Zip) Street Location of Pro in esdon: Northern edge of the' Amoco site at Dodd Road Pert3' Qu s and Highway 110 Legal Description of Property: Type of Request: Rezoning X� Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Plan Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number �01 Present Zoning of Pmperty ,:. Present Use _ Proposed Zoning of Property ; Proposed Use Variance Subdivision Approval Wetlands Permit Other (attach explanation) Secrion I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. Paula M. Berger/s/ - (Signature of Applicant) �-Y— W �� (Date) (Received by - Title) 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1VIN • 55118 4v2 • 1850 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING June 28, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights will meet at 8:00 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, July 17, 1990, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc. for a conditional use permit to construct an accessory structure to house a ground water treatment facility as well as soil vent extraction equipment along the northern edge of the Amoco site at Dodd Road and Highway 110 on the following described property: That part of the SW 1/4 of Section 25, mownship 28, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at the NW corner of said SW 1/4; thence North 67.5 feet to the centerline of S.T.H 100; thence easterly along said centerline 444.3 feet to its intersection with the centerline of S.T.H. #49 as established prior to September 5, 1956; thence Southwesterly along the centerline of said S.T.H. #49, 275.0 feet for point of beginning; thence Southeasterly at an angie of 90 degrees 143.0 feet;, thence Southwesterly at an angle of 90 degrees 00' 117 feet; thence northwesterly 149.29 feet to a point on the centerline of S.T.H. #49, said point being 159.90 feet southwesterly from the point of beginning; thence northeasterly on the centerline of said S.T.H. #49 to point of beginning. More particularly, this property is the Amoco Station #5317 located at 2030 Dodd Road. This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed conditional use permit will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING June 6, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Mendota Heights will meet at 8:00 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, June 26, 1990, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc. for a conditional use permit to construct an accessory structure to house a ground water treatment facility as well as soil vent extraction equipment along the northern edge of the Amoco site at Dodd Road and Highway 110 on the following described property: That part of the SW 1/4 of 5ection 25, Township 28, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at the NW corner of said SW 1/4; thence North 67.5 feet to the centerline of S.T.H 100; thence easterly along said centerline 444.3 feet to its intersection with the centerline of S.T.H. #49 as established prior to September 5, 1956; thence Southwesterly along the centerline of said S.T.H. #49, 275.0 feet for point of beginning; thence Southeasterly at an angle of 90 degrees 143.0 feet; thence Southwesterly at an angle of 90 degrees 00' 117 feet; thence northwesterly 149.29 feet to a point on the centerline of S.T.H. #49, said point being 159.90 feet southwesterly from the point of beginning; thence northeasterly on the centerline of said S.T.H. #49 to point of beginning. More particularly, this property is the Amoco Station #5317 located at 2030 Dodd Road. This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed conditional use permit will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk � •1 - ♦ 0 _� C lty O�. _. _., - .�,, j� 1V�endota,_ Heiglits June 22, 1990 Ms. Paula Berger Delta Environmental Consultants 1801 Highway 8; Suite 114 St. Paul, MN 55112 m Dear Ms. Berger: Your application for a GUP �or ��e.-Ssoc-� �� will be � considered by•the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, �v�-i- 2-� .. - The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hall in the�Council Chambers. You, or a representative -should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your . application will receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, tl�C-�r'�-.-� - Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452.• 1850 � a1:l�is��m . ,CER I A-T.E�OF:INSURANCE j � . ,. . � . ISSUEDATE(MM/DD/YY) . . • �:. a ��:.�.,:.�*::�,j t.� . , . - - � .. �- o � -s a PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, 'I O R I Z O�i A G E� C Y 9 I� C o EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW 1109� VIF:ING DRIVE� ��150 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE EDE� F'r�iAIIiIE r �'ii`�! JJ��'Af CODE INSURED SUB-CODE COMPANY A LETTER COMPANY B LETTER COt�lTIt�Ct�TAL Ii�S CO hIAf�TFOf�D T�l� GO COMPANY `. DELTA Et�VIRO�lt�SE�lTAL C0�l�ULTAt�TS I��ER COi�TI�E�lT�L T�lS GO 9Q� ��G �...�ii�� lQ�� 9 5UITE �Da COMPANY ST I"�AUL 9 M� JJ�. �.� LETfER � _ COMPANY E LETTER COVERAGES , . ....... .. "_ �.. :.. _:. . '. � , .. , - , , . . ` . , " � .•, � . .. ',. . . THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSUAED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO . TYPE OF INSURANCE • POLICY NUMBER P�LICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION p�� LIMITS IN THOUSANDS _TR DATE (MM/DD/YY) DATE (MM/DDfYI� (� GENERAL LIABILITY ' X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY . CLAIMS MADE x OCCUR. OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT. � 'UTOMOBILE LIABILITY � ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS , x HIRED AUTOS � NON•OWNED AUTOS GARAGE LIABILITY EXCESS LIABILITY C � OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKER'S COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY GE,F'600b76Q �iu�r�z��s�i CLXGE:F'640b7E4 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ � � (� � �. �% 1 I S(!� ,� � f], f t� Q PRODUCTS-COMP/OPS AGGREGATE $ � Q� p PERSONAL & ADVERTISING INJURY $ �(� O O EACH OCCURRENCE $ j, O O O FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $ J� ; MEDICAL EXPENSE (Any one person) 5 J COMBINED SINGLE � $ ��j.0%�%� ��.��. LIMIT �.��}� BODILY INJURY $ (Per person) BODILY INJURY $ (Per accident) PROPERTY $ DAMAGE 1211/89 1�/if�G OTHER . ; PfiqJECT 10-88-330�.02 A�iQCO #5317 i�Ei�DQTA HCIGHTS r�f�! $ $ $ EACH AGGFEGATE OCCURFiENCE s s �oao �oaa STATUTORY ' (EACH ACCIDENn (DISEASE—POLICY LIMI"n (DISEASE—EACH EMPLOI DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS AGGF�EGATE LIt�IT5 t�AY E,C FiEDUCED E,Y ACTUAL CLAIi�SS F'ATGr TF A�lY. EXCLUSIO�lS CG2�33-TESTI�lG QFi CO��ULTTi�G E� 0, CG211b DESIG�ATEp F'fiOF SERV CG2293-E�GTi�lCEFiS-AfiCH SURVEY�fiS F R 0 r LTAE: 89�{r�4 E��OAD FOri�'i F'�LLLITIU�! EXC ,CERTIFICA'TE HOLDER . Y. , _x,�..�" ` � CANCELLATION^ . ... , ,_,��..<., T�:£,�_ ` . �ry � �,, ��,��,� � ' SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE ; -� :` EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO CH(�IR�fAN OF I=�LA�l�I�lG CQ��IISSIQI� MAIL 10DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE C x T Y O F � C�! D Q T A H E I G H T a :' � LEFf, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPO O OBLIGATION OR j. 1 Q�. V I C T O F:I Fi C U r'l V E F'+ LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPAN S A OR EPRESENTATIVES. �il'��lGOT'A HETGHTS9 �it� JJ�ig AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE �� F:ICHf�f�D J F:OCHEF ' � wi� . :ORD 25-S (3/88) � ' ` ` � ' ° � - � � _ . �ACORD RPOR» ION 1�988 C ity o� 1Viendota Heights July 13, 1990 Mr. Craig Anderson Delta Environmental Consultants 1801 Highway 8, Suite 114 St. Paul, MN 55112 Dear Mr. Anderson: �,�•d��-F-�o�.�. � _ v� t'��,� � f _ Your application for a -� �- �GeSSa c"y �(� • will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, �� ('j , l`� � p The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.�M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive b Council consideration. ico The Planning Coanmission recommended cep�rz�va.< <,,} c�f�1�. 'r1r-e 4 �CCS �- v�-Q��t- � c, � �-e.�1 Se.'�ac'�s� C�� "\ Y�a..�' '{�1n-�t SO a, .�� W''1S . �L JS�c.� o vl �•� �u r-�'�e S�� (� v c'� OS� o'� p� D ��w ara�K.��•.�c� � -f�,.� �t�-� ��. (B�KQ..S � t2w+ov�cc9 ��e-�' {��tr^erv� If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. KLB:kkb Sincerely, � M l - Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant � 1101 Victoria Curve -1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452•1850 e � To: From: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 13, 1990 Mayor, City Council and City Administrator James Danielson, Public Works Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assista t�(� Subject: Case No. 90-20: DISCIISSION Sjoholm --CUP for Fence Mr. and Ms. Jack Sjoholm appeared before the City Council at their July 10, 1990 meeting to request a CUP for a Fence along their north property line abutting Wentworth Avenue. Council did not grant approval and suggested changes that the Sjoholm's could make in order to have a more amenable plan. Staff inet with the Sjoholms this week to discuss revisions in their fence plan. The Sjoholms have submitted a compromise plan that includes significant changes in the design of the fence. (See attached copies of the revised plan and an additional letter of statement submitted by the Sjoholms.) , 1. 2. 3. The revised plan shows: The fence moved back to a distance of fifty two feet (52' ) from the centerline. The length of the fence has been reduced to one hundred fifteen feet (115') from one hundred seventy five feet (175' ) . Additional landscaping has been added with the inclusion of three Black Hills Spruce trees for better screening. In addition, the 5joholm's statement indicates they are willing to treat (stain or scallop) the fence in a manner that Council desires and to leave in place existing vines and natural growth to help screen the fence. ACTION REOUIRED Meet with the Sjoholms. If the Council desires to accept the compromise plan submitted, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 90- ,"A RESOLIITION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FENCE". �• CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FENCE WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Jack Sjoholm have made application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for construction of a fence at 1161 Delaware Avenue along their north property line adjacent to Wentworth Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 26, 1990 to consider the application for construction of said fence; and WHEREAS, based upon the public record transcribed on June 26, 1990 the Mendota Heights Planning Commission recommended to the Mendota Heights City Council that the Conditional Use Permit to allow for construction of said fence be approved conditioned upon: 1. That the fence be within the pine trees. s 2. That the approval be for the penciled line on the site plan at a range of forty-three feet (43') to forty-eight feet (48') from the centerline of Wentworth Avenue. WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on July 10, 1990 to consider the Sjoholm's application to build a fence and requested revisions to the plan; and WHEREAS, the Sj oholm' s have submitted a revised plan date July 13, 1990 incorporating suggested revisions. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will have no adverse effect on the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the community and surrounding land; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that construction of said fence would not be adverse to the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance! � BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the fence will be within the pine trees and not less than fifty-two feet (52' ) from the centerline of Wentworth Avenue and will be built in a manner consistent with the said revised plans date July 13, 1990 at one hundred fifteen feet (115') in length and including the proposed landscaping. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this tenth day of July, 1990. CiTY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor ATTEST: e Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk U _: 1 -�- �; July 11, 1990 T0: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Jack and Gretchen Sjoholm RE: Conditional Use Permit to build a privacy barrier Enclosed you will find plans for a privacy barrier along the north side of our property, paralleling Wentworth Avenue. This barrier represents a compromise from a fence which we previously proposed. In presenting this plan we believe we have made a good faith attempt to address the concerns expressed by the Counci•1 on July 10, 1990. The proposed privacy barrier is placed 52� feet from the center- line of Wentworth Avenue. The existence of three Iarge trees prevents the barrier from being placed further south on our property. The placement of the barrier will provide a green space of 32 feet between the outside edge of the ditch and the barrier. Within this area, as indicated by green circles on the plan, are 10-11 existing trees. In order to makie the barrier less visible and to ensure the green "wall" effect, we propose planting three Black Hills Spruce as indicated by the pink circles on the plan. Instead of extending the barrier for the entire length of our back yard, we are willing to limit its length to 115 feet. In addition, we wi11 allow vines to grow on the barrier and will stain it rather that waiting for it to weather on its own, if the Council so desires. This barrier is essential to our family's comfort, no� onlyin our yard, but also inside our house. The characteristics of Wentworth Avenue adjacent to�our property are important to note. The uphill grade causes automobile lights to shine into our yard at night. This is exacerbated by the fact that for 75 feet or so, the roadbed is 30 inches above the grade level of our yard. Not only do lights shine into our house, but also vehicl.es appear to be closer than they actually are. Our children, upon hearing that our proposal for a barrier might be denied were visibly upset. They state that i� feels as if cars. are right in the yard, and that they experience car lights shining into their rooms each night as they are going to sleep. We cannot deny that we Iive adjacent to a roadway, but with the combination of the proposed barrier and planting material.s, we hope to minimize the road's impact. �:_ c� r. �- �� .; page 2� We appreciate the need to carefully consider each proposal. We believe that our°proposed barrier is unique, and that few others have circumstances which parallel ours: -the proposed barrier does not enclose our entire yard, or even one complete side of the yard -the barrier is placed 52� feet from the centerline of the road, allowing a green space of 3Z feet between itself and the edge of the ditch -the green space contains 10 existing trees and 3 proposed trees which will shield the barrier from the roadway� -the topography of our property, coupled with the grade of Wentworth Avenue and the level of the roadbed necessitate the use of a barrier to prevent car lights from shining into our bedroom windows. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. We hope the Council will see fit to vote'favorably and grant our request. � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS . MEMO July 13, �1990 To: Mayor, City Council and City r From: James Danielson, Public Works Dir�ct r� Kevin Batchelder, Administrative As ' tant �t� Subject: Case No. 90-21: Batesville Casket Company Variance and Lot Split DISCIISSION At the July 10, 1990 City Council meeting, the Council continued the discussion of the Batesville Planning Case No. 90-21 until their July 17, 1990 meeting to give the applicant a chance to address some of Council's concerns regarding their plan. Staff inet with Batesville's representatives this week and they have submitted some revised plans that have been included in your packet. The plans were submitted late Friday afternoon and staff has not had an opportunity to review the plans for comments in your packet. Pursuant to Council direction, Ba�esville will present their revisions at the Council meeting on Tuesday evening. A copy of the plans have been forwarded to Planner Malloy and there will be a Planner's Report available Tuesday evening. ACTION REQIIIRED Meet with the applicants and review revised plans. A resolution was prepared for adoption at the July 10, 1990 meeting. If Council desires, they should direct staff to revise the resolution in a manner consistent with any Council decision. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 5, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Public-Works Dire Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Ass' nt �h3 SUBJECT: Case No. 90-21: Batesville Casket Company Variance and Lot Split DISCUSSION Batesville Casket Company, represented by Thomas Owens, Attorney, and Bruce Jones, Architect, are requesting a lot split and two side yard variances in order to construct an office/warehouse on Northland Drive at Highway 55 (see attached staff inemos and plans). In addition to the planning considerations, City Council will also need to take action on authorizing staff to grant the building permit. There was much discussion at the Planning Commission meeting about the building being too large for the site. The Commission also had a concern about the parking along the shared entrance drive. The applicant has submitted revised plans that now show an expanded truck turnaround on Lot 3, a revised grading plan showing berms along Highway 55 and I-494, more landscaping, interior roof drains and improved building elevations. The plan shows a thirty foot (30' ) driveway on Northland Drive which is five feet (5') larger than City policies allow for curb cuts. The developer feels they need the full thirty foot (30') opening. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended 4-2 (Krebsbach and Morson opposed) that the City Council grant the lot split. Commissioner Krebsbach and Morson opposed because they felt the building was too big for the lot. The Planning Commission voted 4-2 (Krebsbach and Morson opposed) to recommend that the City Council grant a side yard setback variance to allow a shared driveway for Lots 3 and 4 and twenty foot (20') side yard setback variance to allow a future building expansion along T.H. 55. The Planning Commission, as part i of their motion, suggested that Council should look at shifting the building to reduce the need for a variance. ACTION REOIIIRED If City Council desires to implement the Planning Commission's recommendations, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 90- ,"A RESOLIITION APPROVING A LOT DIVISION AND SETBACR VARIANCES FOR BATESVILLE CASRET COMPANY". Upon adoption of the Resolution; City Council should conduct a building plan review and authorize staff to issue a building permit. JED/KLB:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 20, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson, Public-Works ir Kevin Batchelder, Administrative A t ri� SUBJECT: Case No. 90-21: Batesville Casket Company - Variance and Lot Division DISCUSSION Batesville Casket Company is seeking to relocate from Eagan, MN and has asked Kiesland, Inc. to represent their proposed new development. Bruce Jones Architect has submitted plans for Kiesland showing a 30,000 square foot office/warehouse to house Batesville Casket Company on Lot 4 of Block 1, Northland Plaza. They are proposing a shared drive with LotF3 due to some severe grades and conflicts with an NSP pipeline utility easement. Lot Division Batesville's proposed development is too large to fit on Lot 4. They propose to reconfigure Lots 3 and 4 to accommodate their proposed office/warehouse. This lot reconfiguration can be done without a public hearing as a simple lot division, if the reconfiguration results in two new lots that totally conform to the Zoning Ordinance's minimum size and width requirements. Their proposal, as submitted, meets the requirement of one (1) acre minimum with one hundred feet (100') of frontage. Approval of the lot division should be subject to the receipt of a Certificate of Survey establishing the new lot line. Variances The applicants are requesting two variances, one on the driveway setback and another on the side yard setback abutting a street for their designated future expansion (along Highway 55). The driveway setback variance is requested for the purpose of allowing a shared entrance for Lots 3 and 4. The City's standard driveway width is twenty five feet (25') at the curb. The plan shows a driveway width of thirty feet (30') and it needs to be reduced to twenty five feet (25') where it intersects Northland r�rive . Due to the wide right-of-way width that exists along Highway 55, the applicant is also applying for a twenty foot (20' ) side yard abutting a street variance to allow for a forty four foot (44') wide future expansion. ACTION REQUIRED Meet with the applicant, driveway and building setback to the City Council. JED/KLB:kkb 'review the requested lot division and variances and make a recommendation L � PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION RE�UESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 26 June 1990 90-21 Bruce Jones for Kiesland Inc. Lots 3& 4 Northland Plaza Plan Approval, Subdivision Approval, Variance 1. The subject property is: located east of Northland drive as it curves northward on the east side of Highway 55. This property is also prominently situated in the northwest quadrant of Highway 55 and I-35E. The land is zoned for industrial use several years ago, at which time roads and utilities were installed. While it is currently undeveloped, there is little doubt that this land would eventually be developed since it has good visibility from both I-35E and Highway S5. 2. The applicant is proposing to adjust the lot line between Lots 3& 4 in order to enlarge - Lot 3 to allow for the development of an office/warehouse to be occupied by the Batesville Casket (r�.rnpany. The applicant intends to retain ownership of Lot 4 6 and develop it at a future date. A survey of the existing lots has been provided by Mr. Jones, as well as a site plan indicating the proposed location of the new lot line between Lots 3& 4. Under Section 11.3(1) of the Subdivision Ordinance, a property owner may relocate the property line between two platted lots without the need for a public hearing if the resulting lots meet the minimum requirements of the Ordinance. In this case both the existing a�d proposed lots meet the minimum requirements of the ordinance. The proposed lot reconfiguration of itself appears to present no other problems with respect to the developability of either lot. 3. In addition to reconfiguring the lots, the applicant is proposing to provide access to both lots via a shared driveway as indicated on the site plan. This proposal, while it may limit the type of development that can occur on Lot 4 in the future, has several advantages. First, it reduces the number of driveway access points, and thus, the number of turning movements onto Northland Drive. Northland Drive curves sharply in the area of the subject property and this design could help mitigate the safety concerns associated with traffic movements on sharp curves. In addition, this combined access drive could be located, as indicated on the site plan, further from the intersection of Highway SS. This would allow more stacking distance for the right turn lane at Northland Drive and Highway 55 and would also reduce the conflicts with traffic coming to and from the subject property. Finally, the shared driveway proposal allows for access to Lot 4 to be provided at , Kiesland, Inc., Case No. 90-21 ' Page 2 a point where the existing grade is less severe, thereby avoidi�g the need for retaining walls or steep side slopes which create maintenance problems. 4. The disadvantage of the shared driveway layout is that it may limit the future development of Lot 4. The single driveway could create on-site traffic flow problems which may limit the development potential to projects that require less parking capacity. In addition, the layout of any potential future development would have to conform to the proposed shared driveway location and elevation. Si�ce the proposed driveway is essentially designed to accommodate Lot 3, which is significantly lower in elevation than Lot 4, there would be additional grading required to develop Lot 4 under tt�is scenario versus if Lot 4 were developed independently. While th�s in no way precludes development on Lot 4, it would make it more difficult and more costly. S. The applicant is seeking a variance from the required front yard setback along Highway 55 for the future expansion of the building. As iridicated on the site plan, the setback along this property line after the building is expanded, would be 20 feet. The front yard setback for buildings in this district is 40 feet, and therefore, a variance of 20 feet would be required. The intent of the front yard requirement is to maintain adequate green space within developed areas in order to preserve the aesthetic cha. acter of the City and avoid the condition where the view of private property from the adjacent public roadway is dominated by structures built too close to the road. In this particular instance there are several factors that should be considered when reviewing the applicant's request for variance to the front yard requirement along Highway S5. First, the subject property is located adjacent to Highway SS in an area where the boulevard is significantly wider than usual. The site plan indicates a distance of 105 feet between the edge of the curb and the property line. This is more than ample boulevard space even for a trunk highway such as Highway 55. Generally, the ROW along Highway SS includes additional space to allow for future expansion. However, Highway 55 has already been upgraded in the area adjacent to the subject property, and we are aware of no plans for further improvements. The 105 foot boulevard together with the 20 foot proposed setback results in a distance of more than 125 feet to the nearest travelled lane. Another factor to be considered with regard to the setback variance is the element of existing or proposed screening to reduce the impact of potential views of the structure. The elevated topography of this site and lack of vegetation betwee� the proposed building location and the travelled lanes of Highway 55 make this site very visible from passing vehicles. Put simply, there is, no existing screening. The site plan shows minimal landscaping along the property line adjacent to Highway S5. Five linden trees are shown on the plan, spaced approximately SO "� feet apart. In order to provide any meaningful softening of the building in this area, a minimum spacing of 30 feet is recommended. The berm, which is shown on the gradi�g plan, would be removed when the building is expanded. The proposed 20-foot setback area is not adequate to allow for any significant berming. Kiesland, Inc., Case No. 90-21 � Page 3 One final element in the evaluation of the potential impact on the surrounding area, as a result of the variance request, relates to the appearance of the structure itself. An elevation of the east side of the structure is provided on Sheet Two of the applicant's plans. This elevation shows the entryway, which is one �of the few architectural interruptions in an otherwise relatively typical concrete warehouse. Unfortunately, this feature is located on the opposite side of the building from Highway SS and I-494. No elevation is provided for the west side of the building. However, from the plan we can see that no windows are proposed for that side of the building, so we can speculate that from Highway SS the building would present a relatively monotonous 230-foot-long wall only interrupted by two narrow metal bands. The surface tTeatment is intended to be vertically ribbed, pre-cast, concrete panels. While architecturally treated concrete is among the materials permitted for use on building exteriors in the ordinance, most of the buildings in the nearby office/industrial area are constructed of brick. There is also no elevation showing the south side of the building that faces I-494. As seen on the site plan, the loading docks are proposed to be located on this side of the structure. Though this side of the building would be visible from the. freeway, no landscapi�g or other screening are provided along the south property line. 6. The proposed layout would require variances from the required interior side yard along the proposed realigned lot line between Lots 3 and 4. This is the result of the fact that the centerline of the shared access drive is proposed to be located on the lot line. It would also be necessary to issue a side yard variance for Lot 4 to allow the construction of the portion of the access drive located on this lot. Since the side yard setback for parking areas and drives in this district is 10 feet, the variance would be for the full 10 feet. As discussed earlier, there are several advantages to the shared driveway scheme from a traffic safety standpoint. 7. In summary, the layout of the site as illustrated by the site and grading plans demonstrates that the building is clearly to be too big for � the site. Even after relocating the property line, utilizing a shared access drive, and laying out the site in the most efficient manner the project still requires three variances to the setback requirements and leaves little space for screening from the adjacent public roadways, particularly with regard to the view of the loading area from I-494. Further, the building is located o� a parcel which is highly visible from both Highway SS and Interstate 494 and offers little in the way of aesthetic appeal or landscaping. While the shared ac.cess drive offers distinct advantages from the standpoint of traffic safety, these advantages are somewhat offset by the complications created for the development of the remaining lot 4. .\ . if '=__ � , _ _ . � j _=.£ _ , �RE P NTE ORIV � � . � -- �� . ' --- �� • . - •i� � • _ _ � . � • . . - -_ — - �! ' . . • _ =-_ - _ '. O� • • . _G , .._ _-"_ ' O � ' • ' I .�,. �i — �- _ - _ _ ( � c�„ ' � -- -- -- � , . , • ; ; �� _ -- _ - ` � � - -•- ~--=?��, !', �+7_ _ . . ` ' ,; • � ./�jl •� �' = z-_ � g� u a E'c�i o H i ; i�.', .:, _ _ _— = � � . .. ; - --_ <i= p -- � - --- ' � -` • v� r� ; = = � _� ' � .. -bfmrr�-- .t _ _ --- -�- . •-i =-,• --. � 1""°": _ _ ' . — __ _ .a\� - � - - - % � � - -- � • !�. . � � � _ ___ � � �_�. / �_ .�� - 1/ � • _ , _ CEME,TERY ! 4 � ; = i �r � �� . . ; i; -- -_ � ' ' • i - \�_ i� • i \ . - '� / �' , r . i � % �r �-�f \ � �' • : ) ; �i . j � ��u501[ur •� �� ..= ��, � � = � �� - � Il�; R� � �� _ . . . . � . _�= — a �� . � � I,� l � P � i� ",} • ! • N � �� I w a 1 f� r' �/ _ — ' �• �y,�, . - _ _ � �i � _ " _ r, ' I —_ -- \ �/ - yU , ^\ �� a . � � � � _ - tf , �� I � � �� f -- _ ' _— � , j 1 = n� �' r i F� � �� p i� �l � = - _= �' � _ — — q •� .! �i ! ( i � +�. r_�— �i� � � _— . !� fli l �"' !,� F t� — } 1 � �_ � .- �;�� , „ : � �-_-=- „ - � , l . .. . � - -: �. ' - -- - - _ : . . _ ' --_ __ _. -! wT[R r�wso -r_,%"- ��._ ,,1 , � , ,.\ � Y . . • � I!; -r"-�—� -- / . , � a r. �� _�- _, � \ �. , � i• „ � I J' `_� f j ...E � � � \ � ..__-- ' ---- � � � ' , __ / ' I ;+ + � � � �— , � t I �� /\ ' = 4� � // � ; • �' .� " .' � I � J/i Ow � 1 � ` /� � �/ ' HE�a"TS SUBJECT PROPERTY \` ��-- -'—�— � � __ _ __ _ _ , __ ■ -• �■� �� ; i � ;� � . � � , �; � � � . %� ��:, W � NORTH � � �" . � ,' �; ".�``• J :W � � SCALE 1" . - �_�. �; ,-:, r: �� , =800' �•„ ;,. ;. !;' �`�� iRTHtANa DRIVE � •i'� + . � � i � ' � � ;� \ � � � I � H�RTH1.Ptt t. � 4 F�� // _ __^._ _•--_._'_— ' � + . ..•�.�.,. �' --._. .._..`.. "'+rF�ER? \ ; /� / .' ' _ .-. _- y \' ` M �i Y / .._.� _ •�_ 0�1n[NM ST1TlS Ipfy(11 CO. � -- ,' � �' .� �/ .' � ��--�-- - ` � ' �� • � • . • • ' ' ' �� . .��-�.�.�� . . '� � ./.i�i �e��w�� -�``_�1 ..•- �_'__. .__.. _ �».x . . �'�'i-' ,/� •. 'i `�-('.. • �`' �\ �il �, � . / � . . � ., .- . .._ . . . � ' ' .. `:� �. '�.� �� ' . ` � \ � . S � ` \\ ,\ t' `�l ' �` \` ,' �i � ./ , __ /� � �� j ,�:+ � /'�- , � , � • �--�---._f�—""_��\ ` �. �� i �!; ,.�% . _-_, �' �' ,: . i ; %: � ��:�,, � .�, . . . �� N k w . Ei e'� ' S� 010-77 :LES M. P�RRar�t q-o� q� 26JU'$—A P�r-ro n �, A G �~s^"" t � � �, ,,. i"' . 1 � `j�y� ¢� �� " {it�...Vf�li�L.� V t'R fV iS�"�UV' r�rr��„�, /� 275 3� � � It..vv ,��/ ca � ,� `...1�N 3 � � n v � r �,� � � 3 a � J�� ,,, 7 �i N 89°5'.14,� _ � c• t.� ip �r. � � � / � 375 �70 � O ci ( � �r� �� _ 4 " z � 2g3�� 2 M '.1 '� IX`i N61°L �v 4 : S��°5T p s, 2 Tg s� , G -r ♦ f vs s s t � '^ • 27'�,�C 3PA R� �OF � i� o� � o ,f �# C / !" z �'K � +y 3'�' ? ' � w � � F -- 269 82- .;� je= �z�'4,�� ++�R e 6 p� � h� . e� saa �, •_J Y WEST tiry . � � � �.0 .1•22•12'b.� p a 'd' "- �l � � �� ep � j\ � n ' '�l � ' : f �/��Q : � ' ' � r�ART OF .a � p �� j V Q1'^' 3666� w �=3°5143 ;.- Q � �� p�,� 1C� : ! �! 52.47 : `' � v � N � ?' Q — : / f ' w�.�w� r �("'� � V �� -- � � . -o ' 2� �,L �� °� � � - }� � 3 �,.,, � � � -.., •L . i' b� a2� eq2B�y9• •� o.eq `-f:. • �� a � T � 7 f arp 'C � � � `�c3` p`t-�, � � � � � 4 g g'S ,, �L. � . � P� � • w � d � w �Y ; -p � ,�n , • �' ' i 1 .t 4 F? A k ? !' F � "'- ��i d ��e � � Z .-� N ' ♦ 7 � � �. ` �� , � � 9 ` � ` .. 2��•n y '' �- 1 � �,- ,,�----- - — - - • • -�- �-�-- - � — 1� - .�� , �' � _ . � n '`,,'` +� G��goy62?^ � p ;�, � ,/ t1 a.� �SS.Og � m & ,� � �7% ia�"3e� � �e�='e' a.�a�i � � ' a#'� `x'' O trg¢2C96' 2JP �11� �III/� wl/�6 zai,is u=ag'2fsc" z: 26 � •1� � 7�33• L10.26 �=g38 sa �� AZs269°2i�56,• !. C AZx7�F�'. �. 2 � � SUBJECT PROPERTY � NORTH � SCA1..E 1"=200' - --- ,� - _ _ _. .._ _.. _ Z O Q � �//� uJ � Q�+� W F"- iJ.. 0 H tL W d Z Z .�" CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHT5 DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90 - RESOLUTION APPROVING VAROAMCES FOR AND THE DIVISION OF LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, NORTHLAND PLAZA WHEREAS, owner of Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Northland Plaza, Dakota County, Minnesota has requested from the City to divide said lots into two lots according to the plan submitted, dated 6-29-90; and WHEREAS, the applicant has also requested two variances, one for roadway setbacks for lots 3 and 4 to allow a shared driveway and one for a twenty foot (20' ) side yard abutting a street setback on Lot 4; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said lot division and variances and finds that the requested lot division and variances will have no adverse effect on the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the community and surrounding land. � � NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, that the lot division submitted at this meeting be and the same is hereby approved subject to the submittal of a Certificate of Survey more precisely defining the new lot line; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that ten foot (10') setback variances be approved for Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Northland Plaza and a twenty foot (20') for side yard abutting a street setback variance be approved for Lot 4, Block 1, Northland Plaza. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this tenth day of July, 1990. By ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor c- CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 13, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis��r SUBJECT: Discussion of Expansion Plans at MSP INTRODUCTION As we discussed at the air noise workshop held June 11, 1990, the cities' neighboring MSP have expressed concern that the MAC is proceeding with the development of airport expansion plans without input from the Cities. It is the intent of this memo to discuss ways in which Mendota Heights can influence the airport planning process now being undertaken. BACKGROUND As you may recall, the long term comprehensive plan of the short time line, we informally to include us in tY we have been assured that we letter from Mr. Jeff Hamiel), to do so. MAC owes to the State Legislature a for MSP by January 1, 1990. In light have asked MAC both formally and �e plan development process. Although will be included (see June 20, 1990 we have not yet been invited by MAC Earlier in the week, we unexpectedly received a letter from the Minnesota Advisory Council on Metropolitan Airport Planning inviting us to give testimony to the Council on July 24, 1990. A copy of this letter is attached for your information. Additionally, you may recall that the City of been actively advocating for the adoption of a community airport planning process" by the MAC in o community input. The City of Richfield has adopted a support of such process, and has asked other communities to do likewise. DISCUSSION Richfield has "interactive rder to insure Resolution in neighboring In terms of our invitation to testify before the Advisory Council, as you can see from the letter, they have requested specific information regarding our position on the dual track process. More specifically, the Council is curious about the formal Mendota Heights position regarding physical expansion at the airport versus the future replacement of the current airport with a new airport at a different site. In addition, the Council also asks questions regarding what Mendota Heights stands to gain or lose should the airport be either expanded or moved. � During the next week, staff will be preparing our actual written testimony for this hearing, and thus would like to reaffirm the City's position regarding these issues. Previously, the City Council adopted a Resolution strongly opposing any runway design option which includes a northern parallel runway due to the associated negative impacts on the City of Mendota Heights (see attached Resolution No. 90-27). It would be staff's intention to read this Resolution at the hearing and to submit a copy as written testimony. With regard to possible relocation of MSP, at the workshop we discussed the fact that it was difficult to take a stand one way or the other on this issue until such time as the dual track process had run its course. More specifically, the true impact of a relocated MSP is unknown until such time as a site is chosen and a time frame for moving the airport is decided. In terms of the gains or loses which will accrue to Mendota Heights given the ultimate decision to expand or move MSP, it is impossible to quantify such data at the present time. We could certainly talk about general impacts such as either a reduction or increase in air noise, and whatever affects may accrue to our different types of land uses. Although we are happy to participate in the State Advisory Council hearing, this is clearly not the forum we anticipated providing City input. Furthermore, in that our testimony is limited to twenty minutes, it is not likely that we will have much of an opportunity to learn about the process the MAC is currently following in developing its long range plans. For these reasons, staff feels that our true objective in this hearing process should be to convince the MAC to undertake a collaborative planning process with all communities neighboring MSP. In conjunction with this request, we should also request that the MAC be given a time extension beyond January 1, 1991, to allow sufficient time for meaningful public input. To that end, it is recommended that the Council adopt the attached Resolution expressing support for the collaborative community planning process. In addition, it is suggested that staff be directed to prepare written testimony for the hearing on July 24th setting forth the City's position on the questions posed. ACTION REOUIRED Should the Council so desire, a motion accepting staff's recommendation would be in order. In addition, any additional information which the Council would like to see included as part of our testimony should be discussed. MTL:�kb �, t ,5 5,,ti. a t t L J � t r+. z yt o D t N H °o � q Y � LO A June 20, 199� °�ty ' � • 5�� P�� METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION P O. BOX 11700 • TWIN CITY AIRPORT • MINNESOTA 55111 Mr. Tom Lawell City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Tom: PHONE (612) 726-1892 Thank you very much for your letter of May 22, 1990, expressing the City of Mendota Heights' concerns regarding expansion plans and runway configurations presently being contemplated for the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. As you have indicated in your letter, there are several design options under consideration at the present time that have been presented to the Planning and Environment Committee of the Metropolitan Airports Commission. At the present time the Commission staff is working on an overall plan that would permit the incorporation of communities adjacent to the airport into the decision making process. I very much appreciate your inclusion of the City'� resolution and I can assure you that it will be part of our deliberation as we develop a process for community involvement. The Commission fully understands the concerns the City of Mendota Heights might have regarding the addition of a third parallel runway at the airport. Prior to the Commission taking any action, we will certainly coordinate and request the involvement of Mendota Heights in the decision making process. The decision making time line is aggressive and we do anticipate preliminary expansion alternative decisions in mid to late 1990 in preparation for submittal of the complete report to the Legislature by 1991. Once Commission staff and the Commission has approved a procedure for community involvement in the decision making process I will notify you regarding your participation. It is my hope that the City of Mendota Heights, in cooperation with all communities adjacent to the airport, will be actively involved in helping the Commission through this difficult decision-making process. Again, thank you very much for taking the time to write, I fully understand your concerns expressed, and will notify you at the appropriate time. Sincerely, y .' Hamiel i Director The Metropolitan Airports Commission is an equal opportunity employer OFFICE LOCATION-6040 28th AVE. SO.—WEST TERMINAL AREA—MINNEAPOLIS-SAINT PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Legislators Senator John Marty Senator Bill Belanger Representative Jean Wagenius Representative Jerry Knickerbocker Public Members Suzanne Sandahl Minneapolis John T. Richter Minneapolis Eve Webster Northfield A1 Loehr St. Cloud Hugh Schilling St. Paul Dave Danielson Chisholm State Agency Heads Commissioner Leonard Levine �ansportation Commissioner Lani Kawamura State Planning Commissioner Gerald Willet Pollution Control Metro Agency Representatives Thomas Holloran MAC Chairman Sam Grais MAC Commissioner Steve Keefe Council Chaiiman Donald Stein Councilmember Aviation Induatry Reprea�ntatives Tim Thornton Northwest Airlines Craig Hayes Delta Airlines Nonvoting Members Frank Benson Manager, Mpls. Airport Office Elaine Kienitz Congressional Appointee SEate Council Staff Jill Schultz Senate R.esearch Tom Todd � House Research Paula Hanson (612) 296-3205 Legislative Assistant MINNESOTA ADVISORY COUNCIL ON METROPOLITAN AIRPORT PLANNING Senator Keith Langseth Representative Bernie Lieder Co-chair Co-chair July 9, 1990 Tom Lawell, City Administrator Mendota Heights City Office 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Lawell, The State Advisory Council o� Metropolitan Airport Planning, created by the Minnesota Legislature as part of the airport dual track planning process, is holding a meeting July 24, 9:00 am to noon, at the Metropolitan Airports Commission headquarters, to hear testimony.from the six communities surrounding the airport. Representatives from Minneapolis, St. Paul, Richfield, Eagan, Bloomington and Mendota Heights have all agreed to testify. We would ask each city to limit its tes- timony to 20 minutes and to address the following questions. 1. Does yourcommunity support or oppose the physical expansion of the current airport through the addition of one or more runways and the expansion of terminal facilities? Does your community support or oppose the future replacement of the current airport with a new airport at a different site? How does your community's position on a new airport hinge on its location? 2. What does your community stand to gain or lose if the current airport is physically expanded? What does your community stand to gain or lose if the current airport is replaced by a new airport a different site? (Please address the economic impacts.) G-24 State Capitol, St. Paul, MN 55155 8 , e � 3. If your community were to emphasize three points that it wished policymakers involved in the dual track planning process would remember, what would they be? We are fully aware each of the communities has a great number of other concerns and opinions about current activities at the air- ._ port such as the extension of runway 4-22 and the runway usage system. Because of the charge and_focus of this group, we ask that community representatives limit their testimony to the air- port development questions above. We ask that if any of the proposed runway options the MAC is cur- r�ntZy consid2ring in its work or. the long term comprEhensi:�Q plan have specific impacts on your community that you would sup- port or oppose, that you would address these. We look forward to hearing from you. ,:� � � /� Se ator Keith Langseth Co-Chair Sincerely, Representative Bernie Lieder Co-Chair MINNES4TA ADVISORY COUNCIL ON METRQPflLITAN AZRPORT PLANNING LEGISLATORS Senator Keith Langseth G-24 Capital St, Paul, MN 55155 296-3205 C�Ct LcL� �.�C(ll)i..l Senatar tJ �-�-� ��.�, St. Paul, MN 55155 296-5645 Senator William Belanger 107 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 296--5975 Representative Bernie Lieder 52� State Office Building �t. Paul, MN 55155 296-5091 Representative Jean Wagenius 545 State Office Building St. Pau2, MN 55155 296-4204 Rep. Jerry Knickerbocker 283 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 296-4315 PUBLIC MEMHERS Suzanne Sandahl Eve Webster 151$ E. Lake St, Suite 210 22 Bridge Square Minneapolis, MN 55407 Northfield, MN 55057 722--2693 ' (507) 663-1215 John T. Richter 3315 Cedar Lake Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55416 922-9496 Dave Danielson RR3. 102d Chisholm, MN 55719 A1 Loehr 203 I6th Ave. No. St. Cloud, MN 56301 252-2403 Hugh Schilling 35� Woadlawn St. Paul, MN 55105 STATE AGENCY HEADS Transportation Commissioner (or designee) Transpartation Bui].ding �� .z�-� John Ireland Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55I.55 296-3000 State Planning Gammissioner Lani Kawamura (or designee} Third Floor, Centennial Office Building 658 Cedar Street St. Paui, MN 551.55 297-2325 Pal3ution Cantrol Commissioner Geraid Wiliet {or designee} 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155 296-'7341 ' Metro Agency Representatives MAC Chairman Thomas Holloran Council Chairman Steve Keefe College of St. Thomas Mears Park Centre Box 5005, 2115 Summit Ave. 230 E. Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55105 St. Paul, MN 55101 647-5542 • 291-6390 MAC Commissioner Sam Grais 740 River Drive, Apt. 8E St. Paul, I�I 55116 699-5066 Councilmember ponald Stein 11721 Evergreen Circle NW Coon Rapids, I�II�T 55433 755-3333 Aviation Industry Representatives "' " --�`� ., General Counse�C�"�l2� -��L� �LG� Northwest Airlines � �� Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport St. Paul, MN 55111 726-2111 Craig Hayes, Regional Manager Properties Delta Airlines Dept 880 Hartsfield Airport Atlanta, GA 30320 (404) 765-2145 Nonvotinq Members Frank Benson, Manager Minneapolis Airport District Office FAA Airports District Office b020 28th Ave. S., Room 102 Minneapolis, MN 55450 725-4221 Elaine Rienitz, Congressional Delegation Apppointee 462 Federal Court� Building " 110 S. Fourth Street Minneapolis, 1�I 55401 348-1649 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAROTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90- 2� A RESOLIITION OPPOSING THE METROPOLITAN AIRPORT COMMISSION�S AIRPORT EBPANSION DESIGNS FOR A NORTHERN PARALLEL RIINWAY WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights would like to restate its concern with the current state of aircraft overflights and associated noise over the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights currently receives a disproportionate amount of air noise impacts due to current aircraft overflights and procedures; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Airport Commission recently received Runway Design Options for possible expansion of Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport; and WHEREAS, two of the four design options for runway expansion consist of northern parallel runways that would significantly increase the disproportionate air noise impacts that are already victimizing the City of Mendota Heights. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that�the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights strongly opposes any runway design options that include a northern parallel runway and its associated negative impacts for the City of Mendota Heights. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Mendota Heights recognizes the Metropolitan Airport Commission's timelines for a decision on the runway options and feels it is the Metropolitan Airport Commission's duty and obligation to include our community in any and all decisions regarding airport e�ansion. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 1st day of May 1990. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � BY �.-r.�. -� /'Lt.�.,.�-..� Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTES : �� Ka leen M. Swanson, City Clerk City of Richfield • 6700 Portland Avenue • Minnesota 55423-2599 City Manager Mayor James D. Prosser Steve Quam July 5, 1990 Mr. Tom Lawell City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear M��ell: Council Edwina Garcia lvan Ludeman Martin Kirsch Michael Sandahl On June 25, 1990, the Richfield City Council adopted Resolution No. 7644 in support of an interactive community airport planning process to be initiated by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) at MSP airport. I enclosed a copy of the resolution for your information. _ The MAC will need to continue to make capacity enhancements at MSP airport to allow it to remain viable in�the next generation. These capacity enhancement plans may have adverse environmental impacts on the airport border communities. It is imperative that these affected communities and the MAC develop a process to collaboratively identify mutually agreeable measures to mitigate any adverse environmental impacts. I encourage all the communities surrounding MSP airport to approve similar resolutions in support of this concept. The resolutions will persuade the MAC to initiate the formation of an interactive community airport planning group with representatives from all border communities, the MAC, Met Council and FAA. I appreciate your support on this very important issue. SQ:kab Enclosure • Telephone 861-9700 (612) Fax 861-9749 An Equal Opportunity Employer CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLIITION NO. 90 - RESOLIITION EXPRESSING SIIPPORT FOR COLLABORATIVE COMMIINITY AIRPORT PLANNING PROCESS WHEREAS, by Laws 1989, Chapter 279 (the Act), the Legislature directed the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) to adopt a long-term comprehensive plan for the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP) at its existing location; and WHEREAS, said plan must satisfy air transportation needs for a prospective 20 year period and must be accompanied by a concept plan for MSP, including an estimate of facilities requirements, to satisfy the air transportation needs for an additional ten year period; and WHEREAS, the Act requires that such plan must describe: (1) aviation demand and air transportation needs, (2) airport capacity limits and potential, (3) facilities requirements, (4) a plan for physical development, (5) airport operational characteristics, (6) compatibility with metropolitan and local physical facility systems, (7) environmental effects, (8) safety, and (9) the effect on the neighboring communities; and WHEREAS, current operations at MSP and future operations as they may be altered by future airport capacity enhancements have adverse environmental impacts on the neighboring communities of Minneapolis, St. Paul, Bloomington, Richfield, Mendota Heights and Eagan, which effects must be identified and considered in the planning process; and WHEREAS, measures to mitigate such environmental impacts such as sound insulation, sound abatement, redevelopment and clearance should be identified and considered in the planning process; and WHEREAS, cities adjacent to MSP may either facilitate or impede appropriate airport improvements by such activities as development, redevelopment, construction of capital improvements and regulation of land use; and WHEREAS, such activities by adjacent communities may also be frustrated by decisions made by MAC and about MSP improvements; and AHEREAS, it is therefore not sound public policy to undertake planning for capacity enhancements at MSP or identification of adverse impacts and means of mitigating them without participation by the communities most ePfected; �nd WHEREAS, there is no process in place for effective exchange of such information between MAC and neighboring communities. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the Metropolitan Airports Commission initiate a collaborative community airport planning process; and 2. That the planning process include the cities of ._ Minneapolis, St. Paul, Richfield, Bloomington, Mendota Heights and Eagan; and - 3. That the purpose of the collaborative interactive planning process be to identify airport adverse environmental impacts on communities surrounding the airport and identify mutually agreeable measures to mitigate these adverse impacts; and 4. That this information be considered as part of the MAC capital improvement planning process and documents; and 5. That this process be initiated as soon as possible; and 6. That the information gathered as part of the interactive planning process be forwarded toge�her with the MAC capital improvement plan to the legislature; and 7. That the state legislative deadline for receipt of the MAC capital improvement plan be extended to at least June 30, 1991, in order to provide sufficient time to complete this process. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17th day of July, 1990. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk � �� . � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGiiTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Jim Danielson, Public Works Dir c r SUBJECT: Water System Study DI5CUSSION• Mendota Height's water distribution system was last analyzed in 1972 by Bettenburg, Townsend, Solte and Comb. The accepted way to anal�rze systems at the time was by the Hazen/Williams formula with all the calculations done by hand and the results shown on a map. Today the accepted way for water distribution studies to be done is by computer model using the Kentucky Pipe Flow Model. As far as we know the City's water system is currently working fine with adec�uate pressure and flow throughout the City, with two exceptions; one is a high point along Beebe Avenue that has low pressure affecting several homes and two, the water tank gets "sucked dry" during periods when there is heavy lawn sprinkling. Staff budgeted $10,000 in 1990 in order to hire a consultant to.assist us in establishing a computer model to analyze our system. The results of this study should tell us if there are any problems within the system that we don't know about, and help us determine if there is anything that can be done to prevent the water tower from being depleted. Staff prepare a system for has received the attached proposal from HNTB to computer model of the City's water distribution $6,900. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that HNTB be hired to prepare a Kentucky Pipe Flow Model for the City's water distribution system. ACTION REOUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should pass a motion awarding a contract to HNTB authorizing them to prepare a Kentucky Pipe Flow Model for Mendota Height's water distribution system. This study to be completed according to this attached proposal dated June 21, 1990 with a"not to exceed" figure of $6,900. Al1 costs for this work to be funded out of the Utility Enterprise Fund. �� H�NTB June 21, 1990 HOWARD NEEDLES TAMMEN S. BERGENDOFF ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS Mr. James E. Danielson, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria C�rve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 Re: Proposal for Kentucky Pipe Flow Model of Water Distribution System Dear Jim, 6700 Fru�tce Aa�enue South Suite 260 Minneuj�ol'u, Mirenesota 55435 (G72) 9204GGG Thank you very much for the tune you and Clayton Eckles recently spent in our office discussing the Kentucky Pipe Flow Model. We hope you both found the visit interesting and worthwhile. As we discussed, HNTB is very interested in preparing a model of your municipal water distribution system. Our proposal consists of the tasks as described below: MODEL FORMULATION AND CALIBRATION We propose to utilize the state-of-the-art computer model known as the Kentucky Pipe Flow Model (KYPIPE). Data such as pipe lengths, diameters, age and materials; storage reservoir sizes, sites and elevation; pressure regulator locations; topography; specific elevations; interconnections with other systems; city water usage; and overall system layout will be utilized to develop a customized computer model for the City. In order to ensure that the model is property calibrated, HNTB, in coordination with the City, will conduct field testing at fire hydrants to verify water pressure and flow conditions at numerous points throughout the distribution system. The testing will involve monitoring pressures at selected locations at specific times when water demands are l�own or can accurately be estimated. The results of the �eld tests will be compared with the computer model developed. The input data will be modified and fine-tuned until the computer model output closely approximates observed findings from the �ield testing program. HNTB understands that Mendota Heights purchases finished water supplied by the St. Paul Water Department. The water reaches the Mendota Heights System through 4 interconnections with the West St. Paul System. HNTB will take special care, therefore, to coordinate with the Cities of St. Paul and West St. Paul to determine how their respective distribution systems impact the operations of the Mendota Heights system. P�rtns�� Chartes T. Hennipon PE, Oaniel J. Spipei PE. John L. Caccon PE. Francia X. Hell PE. Robarc S. Cama PE, Ooneld A. Duptae PE. Willlem love FAIA, Robarc O. Millar PE. Jemas L TutGe, Jrt PE, Nuph E. Scho�i PE, Coy C. Goodman A10. Go''dan N. Slanoy, Jr PE, Horvey K. Mummontl, Jr PE, Stophen G. Goddard PE. John W. W�pha Jr PE, Richord D. Backmen PE. Richerd L Fnrnon AIA, Onuglne E. PreecoGt. PE As�eoi�ta� Kentlell T. Lincoin CPA, RobePta W. Smitham PE, Narry D. Bertoeea PE, Relph E. Robison PE, Steniey 1. Moat PE, Robert W. Anzio PE, WalYsr Sherko PE. Jame9 O. RueseX PE Rose L. Joneon AIA. Frenk T. Lomm PE. H. Jarome BuUer PE, Blaiee M. Cerriara PE. Miehaot P. InBerdia PE. Bornord L. PNnea PE, Swphen B. �uinn PE. Saul A JFlcoba PE. Ewinp H. Miller FAIA, Oouplae C. Myhre PE. Curi J. Melloa PE. Ouniol F BOCkar PE, Ooneltl P. KauCh PE. Roneitl L Hertja PE. Robert W. LueCombe PE. Thomue L. Williams AIA, DenNa E. Cankiin PE, John E. Kupke PE. Rotlnay P Pallo PE. Stavan M. Roige Alq Robert A. LeiCk PE. Glann D. Soduieky PE, Benjomin A. Whialer PE. Ropar S. Auetin PE, John O. Brothare PE, Cherlen L. O'Reilly, Jr. PE. Roherc M. Sloan PE, Oouplaa A. Boyd AIA. Reymontl J. MCCOCe PE. Thomee A Skinner PE, Paul A. YaroBai PE OHlaa� Alexnntlria. VA. Atlonte. GA. Boton ROuge. LA. Boeton, MA, ChBrIOeCon. WV, ChiCeOo, IL, ClevalBnO. OH. ConCord, CA, Oalloe. TX. Oenver CO, FairfiBltl. NJ, Hurcford. CT, Mouecon. TX, Indianopolie, IN, Irvine. CA, Knnso9 City. MO, louisville. KY, LaxinDcon, MA, Loe AnOele9. CA. Miemi, FL. Milwnukee, WI, Minne6polie. MN, N9w Y�tr`k, NY, Cl�lwncJ[f. FL Clvq�lpntl PJ�rM KS. Phiin�ialnhiq Pp Phnnni. p7 qntni�h Nf' �an�t,lw WA Tn+.�a FI T��nw IlK W'�Iminnrnn I'lc Mr. James E. Danielson, P.E. June 21, 1990 Page 2 SYSTEM EVALUATION Using the calibrated model, HNTB will evaluate the system under average day, peak, and maximum day; during a fire for the current year, the year 2000 and the year 2020. During this Task, meetings will be held with City personnel to determine nins to be made, to select fire areas and incidents when pipelines are out of service and other general system constraints. Approximately 20 to 25 runs will be made during this phase. (Maximum day and fire conditions will have several runs due to altemative �re locations.) Based upon the computer printouts, a summary tabulation of all reaches of pipe that have velocity and/or pressure deficiencies will be prepared. System deficiencies and requirements along with reservoir storage needs will be identi�ed for both the developed and undeveloped areas of the City. Particular care will be taken to evaluate the system in the area of the existing storage reservoir with a number of possible additional mains included. Any other areas of specific interest will be identified through meetings between City and HNTB personnel. STORAGE HNTB will evaluate the storage capability related to existing/projected demand of the Mendota Heights distribution system. If additional water s�orage capacity is needed, the KYPIPE Model will be utilized to help size, locate and evaluate the most efficient locations for additional storage capacity. CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Information obtained from a11 previously completed efforts will be analyzed. Altemative methods to optimize operations and improve the system will be developed. Alternatives will be developed, taking into consideration the potential impacts to the system due to developed areas near I-494. Computer veri�cation runs will be performed to support altemative solutions. Cost estimates, a comparison matrix, and a 5-year Capital Improvement Program will be developed. Throughout this phase, HNTB personnel will have discussions with City personnel to ensure a project that will meet the needs of the City. A final report will be prepared which will compile information from the previously described tasks and will summarize the recommendations for system improvements and the capital improvement program. REVIEW PROCESS HN1'B will meet with City personnel several times throughout the study at scheduled progress review meetings. In addition, HNTB will prepare a draft report for City review and comment. Formal progress review meetings and the schedule for completion of the draft report is included in our project schedule. Mr. James E, Danielsan, P.E. June 21, 1990 Page 3 If requested, F31�iTB will assist City personnel in presenting this report to the City Utilities Commission and, the City Council. HNTB will prepare appropriate graphics to suppart this presentation. HNTB will provide Mendota Heigbts copies of all computer disks and a basic user manual describing the use of the distribution system computer madel. HNTB will provide appropriate training and instruction for City Pers�nnel so they can maintain and update the system model so that future e�ansion project scenarios can be evaluated. SCHEDULE " HN'1'B will submit the KYPIPE Modei and a draft of the S-year Capital Improvement Plan to the City for review and comment within 8 weeks from Notice-to-Proceed. HNTB will furnish the City 10 capies of the approved 5-year Capital Impravement Plan within 10 days after review and comment by the City of Mendota Heights. PROJECT FEE HNTB will complete the KYPTFE Distribution System Madel and associated 5-year Capital Improvement Plan for the City of Mendota Heights far a maximum fee of $b,900. I3irect salary costs will be multiplied by a factor of 2.8 and will be invoiced to the City up to the esiimated project maximum fee. The 2.8 multiplier includes all labar, overhead and pra�t costs. HNTB direct expenses will be invaiced to the City at cost and are included in our precedi�g estimate. Please note that our estimated project fee includes a charge of $500 that HN'I'B must pay to acquire the KYPTPE saftware package that will be turned aver ta the City upon praject completion. Qur proposed fee atso includes 8 haurs of HNTB time for City in-house personnel training and instruction so City personnel can learn to use, maintain and update the system model, thereby enabling evaluatian of future system expansian,, improvement and repiacement scenarios. HNTB is very excited abaut the possibility of assisting yau complete this project. Please call Brian LeMon, Tom Roushar or me if you have any questions. Thank you again for visiting with us and for cansidering HNTB. Very truly yours, HOWARD fEDLES TAMMEN & BERGENDCIFF Ll��'�`"' �j�� j' 'GVA ale A. Tranter DATjBhs 0140/Mendota.Hts MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT NBV10 TO: Mayor, City Council and City FROM: John P. Maczk ��'�� Fire Chief SUBJECT: New Fire Personnel DISCUSSION: Ad ini July 11, 1990 Over the past several months the Executive Board of the Fire Department, myself and City Administrator Lawell have been accepting applications and interviewing to fill � four vacancies in the department. These vacancies were due to the retirements of George Noack Sr. and Steve Carlson, resignation of Dan Barrett, and one position that has been vacant for quit some time. We received 7 applications for interviews and four hav� been sent for physicals. All four of the applicants have had their physicals and will be before the City Council on Tuesday, July 17th for confirmation of appointment to the Fire Department. With the hiring of these four individuals the fire department will be up to it's full authorized compliment of 36. The four applicants being presented before you have impressed those of us conducting the interviews as being excellent candidates for the department. All four have also successfully passed the physical examinations to meet the requirements of being a firefighter. The candidates and a short history of each is as follows: Mark Kaufman - Resides on Cheri Lane and works for North Star Steel Company as a mill operator and temporary foreman. Mark works. a rotating shift so he will be available various times of the day. Primary reason he would like to become member is because "he has atways wanted to be a firefighter and wants to become more involved in the community". Roy Kingsley - Resides on South Lexington Avenue and works for General Sprinkler Corporation as a field foreman. Roy is responsible for the '"� installation of fire sprinkler systems to NFPA standards. Roy will be available primarily in the evenings. Primary reason he would like to become member is because "he has always wanted to be a firefighter". Roy is also in the Navy Reserves and has received some firefighter training in the Navy. Dave Dreelan - Resides on Swan Court and works for Monroe Systems in Mendota Heights as a sales representative. Dave would be primarily evening response but may be available daytime if a Major incident would occur. Dave's father Paul is a member and his Mother Carolyn is a member of the planning commission. Primary reason he would like to become member is because "he likes what it did for his father and would like to put something back into the community". - Walter' Klarkowski - Is a new Resident of Mendota Heights and Resides on Willow Lane. Walter works for Shanno Trucking as a Dispatcher. Walter is also a veteran volunteer fire fighter having been with the Parkside Volunteer fire department in Maplewood. Walter will be available primarily in the evenings. Primary reason he would like to become member is because "he has enjoyed the Parkside department and likes being involved in the community". RECOMMENDATION: It is my recommendation that Council Kaufman, Roy Kingsley, Dave Dreelan probationary periods effective August ACTION REQUIRED: confirm the appointments of Mark and Walter Klarkowski to one year 1, 1990. If Council desires to implement my recommendation they should pass a motion confirming the appointment of Mark Kaufman, Roy Kingsley, Dave Dreelan and Walter Klarkowski to one year probationary periods on the Mendota Heights Fire Department effective August 1, 1990. � r. An investigation of the need far traffic signal contrat shauld inciude where applicable, at least an auaalysis of the factors contained in the following warrants: � Warrant 1—Mi��imnum vehicular volume. Warrant 2—Intemtption of continuous traf�c. Warrant 3—Minimum pedestrian volume. . Warrant Q—School crassings. . Wazrant S—Pro,gcessive movement. Warcant 6—Accident e�cpericnce. Wanrant 1—Systems. ;- Warrant 8—t'',ombination af warrants. Warrant 9—Four Hour Volumes. Warrant 10—Peak Hour De1ay. Warrant 11—Peak Hour Volume. . t�t-� {�} IV-20 (c) . Rev 4 {G3 Warrant 1, Minimum Vehicalar Yalume � The•Minimum �ehiculaz Voleime wari�nt is iri£eniled fdr application .. where the volume of intersecting traffic is the principa! reason for consideration of signal installation. The warrant is satisfied when, for cach of any 8 hours of an average day, the traffic volumes given in the t�ble below exist on the major streEt and on the higher-volume minar- , stre�t approach to the intersection. An "avera,ge" day is defined as a. wakday representing traffic valumes normally and repea#e�iiy faUnd at the lacation. MYI�IIMUM VEfiICLiLAit VOLUMES FflR WAFiRANT 1 Vehic3es per hpur on Number of lanes for moving traf�c �rQhictes ger haur an higher-volume mi- on �� aPP�� major street (total of nor-street approach M�jor Str�eet Minor Street both approac}�es) (one direction only) 1 ................ 1..__,._....._._. 500 150 2 or more..,..... 1 ................ G00 I50 2 ar tt►ore.. ..... . 2 ar more. __._.. » 6Q0 2�Q !,_..--•-:-•...._ 2 or mare.------- � � These majar-strect and min.or-street volumes are for the sam� 8 hours. During thase 8 hours, the direct�ion of ]�igher volume an the minor street may be on one appraach duriug some hours and on the opposite approach during other hours. i�Vhen the 85-percent%Ie speed of xnajor-stre� traffic exceeds 40 mph in i�er an urban or a rural azea, or when the intersection ties within the built up azea of an isotated cammunity having a population af less than 1Q,OQQ, the Minimizm � Vetucxelar Volume warrant is �0 percent 4f tiie requirements abc►ve. 4C-3 Rev. 3/86 A 2. The number and distributian of gaps in vehiculaz traf�c on the major street when minar-street traffic f�nds it possible to nse the intersectiou safely. 3. Thc 85-perceutile sp�ci af vehi�%s on cantralled approaches at a paint near to the intersection but unaffxted by thc control. 4. Pedestrian detay time far at Ieast two 30-minute pealc pedestrian detay periods of an average weekday or like periods of a Saturday oz a 5unday- Adequate roadway capacity at a signalized intersection is desirable. Widening of bath the ma.in highway and the interseding roadway may bc wananted to reduce ttxe detays +caused by assignment of right-of-way at intersections controlted by trafFic signals. Wideniug of the intersecting roadway is often beneficial to operatian on the mazn highway because it reduces the signal time that must be assigned to side•street traffic. In urban areas, , the effect. of .widening can b+e� achieved by elimination of parking at intersectional approaches. It is always desirable ta have at least twa lanes far moving traffic on each approach to a sigcia3iz,ed intezsectian. Additional width may be necessary on the Ieaving side of the intersection, as weil as the approach side, in order to clear traffic #hrough t2ie intersxtian effecxi�vely. Befoxe an int��s�tian is widencd, the adciitionat green time nceded by pedestrians ta crass the widened streets shouid be checked to ensure that it wilt not eJcc.eed the green time saved through improved vehicular flow, 4G2 Warrants for Traffic Signal Insfallatiou Traffic cantrol signais shouid not be instalIed unless one ar more of the signat warrants in this Manual aze met, Informatian should be obtained by meaas of engineering siudies and compared with the requirements set forth in the warrants. Tf these requirements are nat met, a traffic signal should neitiier be put into operation nar cvntinned in operation {"�f already installed).� For the purpose of warranting signalizatiou, a wide-median intersedian should be cansidered as one intersection. . When a traf�c cantrol signat is indicated as be"mg warranted, it is presumed that the signal and aII reiated traffic control devices and markings are instaIled accdrding to thc standards set farth in this Manual. It is further presumed that signa! iudications are properly phased, that raadways are praperly designed, that adjacent traffic siguaLs aze properiy coordinated, that there is adequate supervisiou of the ogeration and maintenaace of the signal and all af its related devices, and thai the traffic signai cantrolter wili be selected an ihe basis of engincering study and }udgment. � .� . CITY 4F MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO The newest plan i� below the projected volumes af all the 3985 plar�s except Conaept A, which a�sumed 100% single fa�nily development. Therefore the recommendations made by Anderson back in 1985 prett�r much hold true today too. Andersan's study a.ndicated that t�he ane area which could need special attention would be the intersectian of Mendata Hei.ghts Road and Dodd Road. He stated that at same point the increased traifi.c volumes would warrant additi.ortal in�ersection improvemc�nts such as left turn lanes, ar traffic lights. This still holds true; at same point improvements will be necessary, Thi� is no great concern, as it is no surpri�e, and any costs wauld be covered by state funds. As far as t.he timing of intersection improvements, that is dependent on specific state guidelines called "Warrants��. In this case fihe governing Warrant would be traffic volumes. When traffic volumes meet a aertain specified a�nount, improvements would be warranted, and therefore the state would participate in the funding of the improvements. The, attached document ina3udes st�a.te rules far Warrants. These Warrants would prabably not be met� unt�il additional . significan� deveiapment takes place. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 19, 1990 TO: Planning Commission _ FROM: Klayton H. Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Update of Traffic Study for South East Area INTRODUCTION In 1985 the City commissioned Dahlgren, Shardlow, & Uban Inc. to complete a study of the South East Area (which includes Copperfield, Hampshire, Rensington, Bridgeview, and Visitation development areas). The study included an analysis by Jack Anderson of the impacts from the various plans on traffic volumes. The study initially included four possible development plans for the area which were named Concept A-D (not to be confused with tYie various Rensington plans). Questions have arisen regarding the validity of � Anderson's study now that a more detailed development plan� for the entire area is being discussed. DISCU$SIOId . . .. .. Staff has discussed updating the plan with Anderson, and he informed us that it would not be difficult for us to update the study ourselves. He gave.some suggestions to Staff on how to complete an update of his old study. Staff has performed an updating of his traffic study based on the newest Kensington plans. The following is a list of the total projected ADT (average daily traffic) for the entire South East Area based on Anderson's initial study, followed by Staff's projection of the ultimate ADT for the latest Centex plan. PLAN 1985-A 1985-B �ESCRIPTION 634 SF homes 2000 multi, 333 SF iP, . TOTAL ADT 6,340 14,868 1985-C 1,400 multi, 373 SF, 605R office 16,167 1985-D 1,530 multi, 333 SF, 1.26M offi.ce 21,356 3/90 Centex Plan {including all S.E. Area) 11,665 �MAY--09-19y0 13=48 FROM SEH INC. TO 4522995 P.�jS SHORT ECLIOT HENDRIGiC50lS PRGE 2 pF z NWR(,Y, 1 CNANNEL VEHIC�E GOUNT .tFERENCE: MEHf7diA HETGH7S CQRRECTION FACTbR: 7.00 �� .:: ,...k,,.r . ,. . ._ ROCATii�t{: t'lEFfQOiA NEIGNiS LOC: Fi 5�"MENU07li�f�t�,�12�i.�,�D�OOg�� FtLENAESE: �.140MO,S94. ... .y,,,,,t____ . MONDY1Y.3tP.ftIL��C3�j9�j' 11EA7H�R: PROGESSED 26 APRIL 40 , OFEftATOR: GAY, pROCESSEA BY T7K ..•----��---_-^•-�_____-�.-_-.,-,__�-_...�----^-_�_..-_--�__---_-•-----..,..-__•.-_.»_,---�•_-_--••--_-.....__..--------------•.-_-.. tiflUtt NUISUAY 7UESDAY idSDxESUqY THURSDAY FRIOAY LlEEfC�AY SATtlROAY SUNDAY 7 OAY SEGItiS 73 24 25 26 27 AVERAGE 28 24 AVERAGE ...----•------•-----------••----•------•_____...�____�._�-••-------------•----••----�-•--_�..�.---•-_---..-•-••---------•__•____- AM �2 1 3 2 � * 2 *' • 2 1 Q 1 3 * +� 2 rt w 2 2 2 3 9 * +� z � « 2 3 0 1 7 * * t... * * t 4 0 0 Q # ,r r +� ,r ti 5 '10 1D 6 � R q '� w ' 9 6 43 28 • 25 * * 32 "" « 32 7 80 83 99 + * 87 "' "' 87 8 8T St2 �2 « ,r gp rt +r g� 9 50 4) 31 k * 47 * * 4� 10 5$ ri6 55 * * 53 w ,r e� 1 f b4 6? b1 � +� � w ,e � P}I 12 ES 82 77 * « 75 * * 75 i i2 ST 70 � * b� •r + 66 2 7T 57 * * # 67 * '� 67 3 42 . 76 � * w gG '" + 84 � 85 73 { +� * 7g * + 79 . S 8�S 99 « * * qt * "' 91 6 67 Tq �► * « � +r « � 7 63 33 * * * 3g * *� • *�g 8 32 2? * * * �p * « 30 S�' 'f 1 20 * * * 16 * * 96 10 �0 1? * * � 14 � * 14 11 8 16 * rt k 12 '' * « T2 ... __.« .................,_._...__•__•-_---------__._••----•-•------t_�....___....�__-•---_....•----••----•--------�..�.._--_�..__.� `i r f•i .. . . .. . . . ..- . : . ... . . . .. ,.. . .. TOTAI.S .. ..1044 .. 1077 493 .. 0.. . .0 7477 0 0 �� 0�' j x avc u�aY x�oa.� x A�t� onr x��z.a 11f�1 PF11K NR 8 PEAK ft0�1 $T PM pEAIC !iR 3 �a�: FLou �z s�.s �a_s a.o v.o vs.s 4s.s o.o v.a 8 7 x �' 92 9q * • 5 12 t * 99 7'7 * « MAY-09-195C� 13=49 FROth SEH INC. TO 4522995 �P.07 .''� SHORT ELLIOT HENDRICKSOH CAGE 2 OF 2 HWRLY, '1 GHANNEL VEHICLE COUN7 REFERENGE: MEHDOTA HEIGHFS CO$REC�7�.r ,QC7 9.00 I,p�A7I0H: f4EN�OTA N£1GHTS LOC: M 4 �Ifj6E}t�f��74�N '�J��f�� FILEHAF4E: 1GU 4 ,,��q NEATH£R: PROGESSED 26 APRIL 90 ��rya 0?ERATOst: SRV, PROCESSED BY T7K --_��------^_--�--^ -----�---�------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ HWR NONOAY TUESDAY 1IEONESOAY 7HURS�AY ffiIOAY 11EEKDAY SA7UROAY SUNDAY 7 DAY $EGIH5 23 24 �5 26 27 AYERAGE 28 29 AVERAGE •--�----------------------------------------------------------------^--------------------------------------------------------- AM � 12 1 3 0 * `' 2 * * Z i 0 2 0 t * 2 * '� 2 2 3 2 0 { * 3 " t 3 3 0 t 0 � '� 1 * "� 9 4 0 0 0 * + � * * • � 5 5 4 0 � + 5 * '� 5 6 1T 10 0 * * 14 * * 14 7 58 T3 Q � t � « ,r � $ T2 66 0 * R 69 * '� 69 9 27 24 0 '� � 23 * « 23 10 37 i4 0 * * 2b * '� 26 i1 34 0 D * * 34 r « 3G Pii 1i �.2 0 0 � � !� « « � 1 49 0 0 R * 44 * * 49 2 44 0 t « « 44 � " 44 3 46 0 + * t 46 « '� 46 4 56 fl 4 « t r,E, • * SE, S 56 0 rt R +� 56 * * 56 6 52 0 * � *' S2 * `� 52 7 33 0 * * « 33 • * 33 8 21 0 * � * 21 � .�' • 2i 4 10 0 � * * 10 * * i0 10 8 0 * * * • $ * * g �1 � p k k x g « f 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .. . . r� :. ' roTazs .. . _ .� � �, � - �� . . . . . � . . . . ..Q . 4 .. . � . . . . a.. . . o . .�. X AYG ut�AY x AVC aAY IIlM PEAK 8R PEAK fLOS! x�oo.� x�oo.s 8 77 P!S ?EAK HR 4 PEAK FLOW S6 30.1 0.0 0.0 ao.� o.o o.o 7 � ,e � « « + « « t * rt « � �f�iY-09-195C 13 = 4? FRGM SEH I hIC _ TO 4522995 P. f 3 � SHpttT ELlIOT HENORIClCSON PAG£ 2 OF 2 HWRLT, 7 CNANHEL VEHICLE CDUNT REfERENCE: MENDo7A HEIGHTS CO3iREC7;I0H�,rA('�.70{2�Fxi,��00 LOGATION: MENOOTA lIEICHTS LOC: M 1 .�M�ltfi��A�,j---�iAjS�F��}j�g�j FILEtiAME: �4ppiQlyQ �ATNER: PROCESSED 26 APRIL 90 � 0.0►1 fi�iL`•�23'-� 99.(7�� QPERA70A: GAV, PROCESSEb BY T7K •------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ HOUR MONDAT TUESpqY L]EONESDAY THURSDAY fRfaAY 1lEEKbAY SA7UROAY SUtiDAY T DAY BiGINS 23 24 2S 26 2T AVERAGE 28 29 AVERAGE •--------------------------------------•--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AM 12 0 0 i � * � « « � 1 0 p 4 « * � « w 4 2 0 0 2 * * z * « 2 3 4 5 3 * * 4 « +r � 4 0 0 p * * * * t 4 5 5 3 2 +� * 3 * � 3 6 21 14 35 « * Z3 k { � 7 47 �5 63 � * 52 � � 52 8 35 35 30 * �' 33 * � 3� 9 78 17 21 t • 77 • � �T 79 79 20 �5 +r ,r ZZ x K Z� 1� 27 22 32 � rt 2T . t 2y PM 12 77 36 �4 � * � 4 t 24 i 27 17 2� * � 24 * * 24 2 33 28 * � w 39 - * * 37 3 50 57 • « � S4 « w � 4 64 55 K rt .� 60 �. ,� � S 47 49 * * � 48 + « 48 b 47 44 � « � � .r « � T 39 22 * +� * 26 t �' Z6 8 33 19 * t • 26 t .« 26 4 12 12 �' � w 12 w x 92 70 0 6 4 •r « 6 * +� 6 '7 G 6 4 « +r g ,r w 5 •_._��..�___�.�___��----------------��•..'�.��_�'�.�.�____��_�__��__�__��.�_�._�_��_��_�.._�_�•�_��_�_��.�_______•__�__ TDTALS 540 506 27'9 0 0 S52 . .0 .. . 0:._ : 5� x AYG LfICOAY X. AYG pAY AH PEAK HR PEAK F10i1 PM PEAK HR PEAK FlQL7 97.8 91.6 50.5 97.8 91.6 50.5 T 7 � GT ' 4S 63 4 � qZ 64 57 34 �ENOOTA NB10HT8 EOUTHEAET AREA STUDY �AT�J� Populetion Qenereted/ Addltlonet Populetton/ Total Ultlmete Nouteholdt C�enereted/ Tote1 SlnQle Famlly , ToNnhouse Apertment Employment (�enerated TrafEle/ M Hta Rd Enst of Dodd tADT) Trettic/ Totel Ttips In/Out Revenue/ Addltional Oenerated (S) Munlcipel Serv�ce Cotti (!) Matqln/ Net to City t!) Marqln (%s Revenue va. Coiti) Airpo�t Noiae Compatlble impervloue Suttece/ Total Estlmete �oncen! A Conceot B Conceot C Conceot_� Concept �f Cencent B2 2,�87 4,985 4,OS2 4,381 3,744 3,831 13,0'00 1S',91'8 l4,98S 13,320 14,697 14',674 636 2,244 1,7�8 1,099 1,611 . f,QQ4, 638 33'3 393 243 3Q0 243 0 333 294 35S 269 S31 0 f�399 1,f11 1,389 964 894 0 0 3,226 8,528 G,4S8 6,528 4,OS6 6,102 5,028 5,954 9,897 71,152 13,490 f9,993 2f,713 29,560 26,220. 28,•336 412,524 892,985 886,238 i,ff2,929 998,874 1,039,931 354,750 99Q,000 �06,000 7T8,1S0 702,f61' 902,f67 59,994 96,785 270,23E 334,1�9 294,507 3:ib,964 f6 !S 16'S� 49 % 43 !S 42 !� 48 K NO Maybq YES YES YES YES • 10 !S 21 .% 2J. % 29 % 2S !G 25 % ACTION REQUIRED Conduct the public hearing. Should City Council desire to act on the application this evening, they should pass a motion adopting a resolution incorporating their findings of fact. JED/KLB:kkb public concerning this proposed development. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted 5-1, (Morson) to recommend to the City Council that they deny the request of rezoning, CUP for PIID, Preli.minary Plat and Wetlands based on the following finding of facts: - � 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10'. There is no community support for this project. The plan is contrary to the Comprehensive Plan of 1979. Density is ridiculously skewed. Plan presented to the Commission is not harmonious to�the neighborhood and the community. Does not show any proper buffering on the freeway side and on the other side. The plan rec�uests more than a heavy infringement on wetlands which it also will likely use to make the apartments, condominium or townhouses more acceptable. An inadequate use of lands in light of City needs••� for parks and ball fields. There is an unresolved question of safety of parks next�to a freeway. The area is not.suited as i.ndicated by Met Council for single family dwellings. Comp�ehensive Fla�n' calls for a cer�airi �nu�tiber�' of' �� units at certain times. Commissioner Dwyer Friendly Amendment: 11. It will lead to a heightened need for development of an interchange at Delaware Avenue and I-494. 12. Safety concerns for children that will be lured to the ball fields. Commissioner Dreelan Friendly Amendment: 13. Concern for over crowding of schools. Commissioner Tilsen Friendly Amendment: 14. Failure of the developer to give the community an opportunity to reaet to the changes submitted tonight. Commission Duggan Friendly Amendment: 15. The development is contrary to, or opposes, the mission statement of the community. d � 0 � � Staff counted traffic in the summer of 1989 and those figures are within the April Planning Commission memo. Staff has also completed a new traffic count this Spring and the numbers have not changed since 1989 (see attached). TRANSITION The third major concern of neighboring residents opposed to the project is the transition from single family homes to. multi-family units across Mendota Heights Road. Based upon a meeting between the developer and the neighborhood's legal representative, the developer has attempted to address the transition issue by offering an alternative site plan. This new alternative now shows that the proposed project will be single family homes, townhomes, or park land all along Mendota Heights Road across from the single family development. The alternative site plan has replaced sixteen (16) condominium units along Mendota Heights Road with twelve (12) townhome units. (See attached alternative 2 included in the April 19, 1990 staff inemos). MIINICIPAL SERVICES .. In August 1985, the City conducted a study of projected Municipal Services demands related to the Southeast Area. That study indicated that development plans which incorporate multi-family residential units do indeed generate revenues �. • - sufficient to provide basic municipal services: � A full copy �• � ' � � � � • � of this report was distributed as part of an earlier binder of information given to the neighborhood and the City Council. A summary matrix of this report is attached. PIIBLIC SAFETY � There has been a concern expressed by the neighbors about the public safety of the proposed active park. Chief of Police Delmont has reviewed the proposed Kensington Phase II plans and his comments are included in the attached April 19, 1990 staff report to the Planning Commission. PARK DEDICATION Including Phase I, the proposed Kensington development would include a�proxi.mately 112 acres. The City's park dedication requirements are ten percent (10�) of the land being proposed to be developed. The developer has been working cooperatively with the City and the Parks and Recreation Commission to provide additional park land in this area consistent with the City�s voter approved Park Bond Referendum in September 1989. Total proposed dedication is 26.53 acres. (See attached density and acreage analysis for factors on park water and land area). Please note attached petition and letters from the � DISCUSSION Specific planning considerations for the Centex Homes' proposal are outlined and discussed in the staff inemo dated March 22, 1990. The specific considerations are: l. Rezoning. 2. Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development. 3. Preliminary Plat. . 4. Wetlands Permit. Please refer to March 22, 1990 staff inemo for detailed discussions of the separate planning considerations. DENSITY The density issue has been the heart of neighborhood's opposition to the proposed project. Staff has prepared the attached matrix analyzing the density, acreage, pond arad parks in the project, including Phases I and II. TRAFFIC � Traffic impacts�have also been a major concern of those opposed to the praject. Traffic was studied by Mr. Jack Anderson, Traffic Engineer, prior to, and in conjunction with, adoption of the Southeast Area Plan and its attendant Compre�ensive� Plah'Ament�m�nt"ih �1�985: 'Mr. Andc��sonr's''i'r�ffic study included pro�ected traffic volumes based upon full = development of max�num density for the entire Southeast Area. The Anderson traffic study concluded that the (collectorj road network proposed in the area would be adequate to handle�the development provided that two improvements would be constructed at Dodd Road and Mendota Heights Road at the ti.me they are warranted. These two improvements are the construction of a left turn lane and the installation of a traffic signal. MnDOT has the jurisdiction for this intersection and a copy of MnDOT warrants are included in a memo from Klayton Eckles, Civil Engineer, to the Planning Commission. (See staff inemo dated April 19, 1990) . Traffic generation rates that were used for the projections �in the study are as follows: �• La.nd Use Dailv T_ rit� Generation Single Family Residential 10.0/unit Townhouse 5.2/unit Apartment 6.1/unit Office 7.0/1000 sf Commercial 41.0/1000 sf � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 8, 1990 TO: Ma�ror, City Council and City Adutinistrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Revin Batchelder, �dministrative Assistant SUB+7ECT: Case No. 90-03: Centex Homes - Rezoning, CUP far PUD, Prei. Plat and Wetland Permits Cente.x Homes� proposed Rensi.ngton PIID Phase II received Slcetah Plan appraval for Plan C-3 at the June 2{?, 1989 City, Councii me�ting. Phase I had received final approval in � Dece.mber of 1987 and i�s currently vnder construc�ion. This Centex Homes• develapment for Phase II of Rensington has appeared at public hearinqs at the Februaryl . . March. artd -A,�r.il .Planning Commissiaan meetar3gs. Th��e .a:s a �• • • • • • � very e�ensive public record for this development and . i.ncluded in your packa� are the following: � 1. Staff ineuios. 2. Planning Reparts. ' 3. Applicatian materials including site plans, grading plans, prospectus, etc. . 4. Neighborhaod petition and ietter� from the public. 5. Documentation of pub].ic notice. In addition ta your Counail packet and minut�s :Erom the Planning Commissi.on meetings, Cit� Council was provided with a notebook containing background znformation on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment requested by and furnished ta the neighborhood. Planner Howard Dahlgren has been requested �a a�tend the mee�ing and provide a Planner's overview af the issue at the outset af the public hearing prior to the developer!s presentation. Planner Dahlgren intends to cover tize City•s Comprehensive Plan Amendment, land use and density issues, Sketch Plan approval, traffic considerations and the current proposal.� � Bernard P. Friel Suite 500 85 East Seventh Place St. Paul, Minnesota 55107 612 / 293-3816 June 13, 1990 Mayor Charles E. Mertensotto hlendota Neights City Haii 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mayor Mertensotto: Over the last several months I have again found that my travel schedule, which has been particularly hectic, has made it impossible for me to attend several meetings of MASAC as well as meetings of MASAC committees on which I serve. Furthermore, by late summer or early fall I will encounter additional conflicts arising from an interest in other matters which I wish to pursue. It is for these reasons that at this time I find it necessary to submit my resignation as the City's representative to MASAC to be effective August 1, 1990. BPF:pIz Sincerely, � ernard P. Friel CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 5, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis�� SIIBJECT: Accept Resignation of MASAC Representative DISCIISSION As reported verbally at the last Council meeting, Mr. Bernie Friel has submitted his resignation as the City's representative to the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC). As explained in his letter of resignation, other time commitments have kept Mr. Friel from devoting the amount of time which he deems necessary in order to be an effective representative of Mendota Heights. Mr. Friel has requested that his resignation become effective August 1, 1990. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept Mr. Friel's resignation from MASAC, and endeavor to appoint a replacement representative no later than the second Council meeting in August. This course of action will allow the Council a full month to recruit and appoint a new representative. Should Mr. Friel find it necessary to miss the July MASAC meeting, City Treasurer Larry Shaughnessy, the designated alternate to MASAC, has indicated that he will fill in as necessary. ACTION RE4UIRED If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass a motion formally accepting Mr. Friel's resignation, and direct staff to assist in the recruitment of a new representative should the Council so desire. MTL:kkb .� � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO e 6, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Kevin Batchelder, Administrative SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-03: Centex Homes Direct� As s istan��[r{�� City Council closed the Centex Homes public hearing at their May 15, 1990 meeting and referred the Kensington Planned Unit Development back to the Planning Commission with a list of planning considerations to review.- (See attached May 18, 1990 Planning Commission memo for list of planning issues). The Planning Commission reviewed this list with the developer item by item at their May meeting. A Planning Commission workshop was held on June 4th with the developer, staff and residents and again reviewed these items. (See June 21 Planning Commission memo). In response to the May Planning Commission meeting and the workshop, the developer submitted a revised proposal that was reviewed at the June Planning Commission meeting. DISCIISSION For tonight's meeting staff is providing a packet full of the materials, plans and correspondence that has been generated since the May 15, 1990 City Council meeting, as well as some additional background memos. These memos, minutes and revised plans document what has occurred during the Planning Commission review of the Centex Homes proposed Kensington Planned Unit Development. Actions the Council needs to consider tonight are: 1. Rezoning 2. Preliminary Plat Approval 3. Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development 4. Wetlands Permit REZONING The underlying zoning of the proposed Kensington project is R- 1A, R-1B and R-1. (See attached zoning map). The Comprehensive Plan guides this area to be zoned as MR-PUD and HR-PUD. The � 4' � developer's request is to rezone the property consistent with the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL The developer has�submitted a preliminary plat that shows the dedication of a public street, a large park area and numerous condominiums, townhouses and manor home locations. Subject to final approval by the City, the developer proposes to complete a final plat dedicating the public street and park to the City. The remaining areas will be platted as outlots with the final plats completed as the area's development progresses. WETLANDS The property in question includes a large pond, Owen's Pond and a smaller pond that are designated in the City's Wetland Ordinance. The following buildings are shown to be within the hundred foot (100') setback required in the Wetlands Ordinance. Townhouse #39 Townhouse #33 Townhouse #36 Lot 2, Blk 2 Lot 3, Blk 2 Lot 8, Blk 2 Lot 9, Blk 2 Lot 10, Blk 2 Lot 16, Blk 2 Lot 17, Blk 2 90' 70' 75' 95' 85' 75' 85' 80' 40' 80' * All single family Wetlands setbacks are for building pads and may not show future decks. (Please seeJune 21, 1990 Planning Commission memo for discussion of Wetlands). CONDITIONAL IISE PERMIT FOR PLANNED IINIT DEVELOPMENT If Council desires to approve the CUP for PUD they need to establish the conditions under which it will be approved. RECOMMENDATION At the May 15, 1990 City Council meeting, the City Council closed the public hearing and made the findings that the density in the Centex proposal and the proposed park dedication are appropriate. The City Council then referred the Centex proposal back to the Planning Commission for review of a list of identified planning considerations. The Planning Commission at their June meeting attempted to pass a motion to approve the project. This motion failed on a 3-3 (Duggan, Dreelan and Krebsbach opposed) vote. The Planning Commission also attempted to pass a motion to deny the project. This motion also failed on a 3-3 (Dwyer, Morson and Tilsen opposed) vote. � 1� .t: ' � . The Planning Commission recommended on a 4-2 (Duggan and Morson opposed) vote to find that the plan was improved and that the public record gathered during the review of Council's list of identified issues should be forwarded to Council. Commissioner Duggan opposed on the basis of further review and Chairperson Morson opposed because he felt the need for an approval or denial recommendation. ACTION RE9IIIRED Review the information forwarded by the Planning Commission and discuss any concerns or comments with the developer. The Council needs to consider a rezoning, preliminary plat, Wetland and a CUP for PUD. Any approval of this plan should be contingent upon the City and the developer coming to terms through a developers agreement. JED/KLB:kkb y � � i � .. I � .�_. _ . ;��. ;.� �. )� � , : . • • H(1�IIII.PN ! . I I , • , SI�IlS MW[N (�' � , ' ��'��1.. ....�"'.....�� SIIiI•SI�IION IlM � � _ �.,==....--•- • 3 ; —'e• - "-►owee e�scutyl .o.��... .. � .�. . � - -- — , ^ � z ; ; i �� '' FRIEN Y • MARSH �- � ., ,.�. ;. _. ,�, _, . � 4:, : ,., ; � , . . ` 12./ •�` •S ' 'I ♦ PARK � � ti :i � '•.t � - '� � � \ � � � ,;�� ,�s �---�� : �.7�,�Z�TW�= �; _ ' ; � " . .. . -��`` T •r .`, • r,. I � . �`...�.,.�_�} f � • . ..r I I � � � '* � i ._ '� ..\.,�,:..�--_� _',-i2: '._ �� ^ .r.._� _..�... .�i��: __-- �;. ' `'�—. �� I t - - . , - � ' ., - . .- ---+ �r�i ' . ,—� - � . � �: , , �,� % / �, � _� � _�a �; � I 1 . . '; '7�1 ' ; •� . rc` i ��' ,\` r� c._.: ` r. I! . _.. i '� I �� • _ _ ' 'J' I I � '�, ft �' �� \ . i' ��-.z'•`�'r � � • . �i •, / I, ' I • ' i I • , . i � .,�' / •f � ¢ � � �_r�'/..i'� / • - -- .•-•^_-�Y•_ . --i _ •�_ ._ _J �� ...} „� � '�� '? .� / /�, �_ : r-�� . •� . ; � � _�_ _ ; I � `�j� <. �r � ' i`,�"�� , �—.._--j'i \ ••l . . ! +- .t---__�, �� ; � � i . .�. � ��_ � i r.==.=-�, ♦ .,, �.: p �� j1 � r-----IO:� / � : 1 � �. v 1 i' Q PP ( _..i �' \ / � u / ••'S _. G�,J }- • � - . , '� \ ` � 4 K• I . J II K � l E t--. ._..__ eC� i�� a v .� .� i � I . , r"'�..:':':�', j , . . . _. '.. I ( __ 1 . % � o�; � r- �-.:.' - - _�'�.• -•'' ' i' > � 1� id � /' _-_ ' f_ � _` ; ' . a — • - - 1 .. _ / Q, n : ,y f / � ! h J, r _ � i= / . � . I ;Qi n _. ._._L. . � � m - � / '� � 1 �%r � � `'�._,._ '.�\ . . _! !3' , � a --- •-• _, .. / Q, ; � . � J ". � „ : �,; . � j ' . =• � �1�\- � .. . ..��_/ AI . -l.."" _'^' '_� � � JI � Y, •TEO ( � r Q �m \� , �.' \ I � .' ' ._ _; ..� .I�.�.,.. .. � NAi•/��Il::l� . � �` � I . ,� � `�• ... . :' ' � • I . j ,-.: �3: � � I ; � �.. �` J . . �c� ._ .. . --- - - � - ; .._. �� ! ` >`. � ' ' - — - - --- --3-I � � .. vATL� r[� _ � _ . . „ '� ' .. .s7w � - � o ,. �«< ` - . � .. _. � � ,., . . .. . � : � ...i�t��r•� � a . _. . f ' � �o,, �`;, �� .,�..�. � �/�"".� � 4�' ♦ HAG$�QOu ti\C . ... � ie ..� � • a . r� ��. � � � � � ' "'_'�" I � DA9K ., . , .,,., .�. . :�.. _-_ � � , � i ; _ v__ � : ;;: ,� .,,,,: . , . � ,,-� ...1� y - � , , �;�- , . - . _. .. , '.� _,.�... ! �.� \;--�; -• �- 1 � -- ._...._..._.._w._.. ... .. ..___ ._._. � . :� �r � � � � F e i ;'� • . _ � iw / � ' _ - � 1 ` 4 �a� • , `h( - _ .�: .5 . . �� )AO .... ._l • • -•` � S '-`.... � . _e�. • ...__ o i _ • _ � � •'. : _ . i .... ' ' '.. .. � r F _ `�' •;�� Z '.� ._� '� �°---�; `1 ._ �-�---�� ,.w � ` -Y. ��: i . � ,+ � ■ " �:�• !/: . �� 1 � . �_ i �-�1 '�, . � � � , .:_�) ._ � . _ _ � R•1A �. ..._..___ �.� '. ... .. _._�': _ — . � ^ J "t� .. )"' � � � _._. ._ ►^•..•. , , ,. :1,�- --•-_ -•--•-- — — - _ .:..._. -_� . _. : . . ... . ._ - ._.. � .. -•' �._. �. ._ ..._ . .. ..HIGHWAY._....-..-- ~ ��,"�� e _ ' '.. TRVNK -••- . .. �. .. _ _ . ,. _ •_t ; r � _ -- --+ - -_- :.'�` �'� • r. . _• • • �' . -L�rl�i[SIC+'�R�t-fj[2�11iII ' ` - � • - - - - - - - -,- -� : -- --. - - - � ... , �,. . _�� '� . , . . , . ' ---.c.• ',-,: ---. _:� ' ' � ._,_ �' , . �� . ;, :�.� �� . :.;.: ��' • :i� • ::ti�� :,+• �:r�� . •�� ctn�'�:::°:`�� :� " ''.. "; �''.. , �' •• � Y� : / � •,`�..��t • . • • ,��, . ,��' ► �•ti`�� • �', ,.�•� �'�1: ti.. � ��`� _ i'-... :, �• •t' •+•' •�• ;O' � �� , r . .•� �;• ��•;i� ,I•�:';•,� �' �;�; �;�:t•y:•� ., _� . . • ..�`• , . . . • .. . . .. • .. i•.. . . . • .. �r� ...� .�tl. f.. . . .'� �. , . . . � . . .:�.� � � � •i'.. . • . � '� � � Z � • .— TER 1988 = .:: . �;'; � I' ` i�! `L ; ONI�NG AF ' _ �� . � � � _. . ��':., � ,�/ ' '�� , - , ;; CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 21, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Ja7nes E. Danielson, Public Works Dir c. /'�� Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis �X[,�) U SUBJECT: Case No. 90-03: Centex Homes At the May 15, 1990 City Council meeting the Centex Kensington proposal was referred back to the Planning Commission to address numerous planning issues identified by the City Council (see attached May 18, 1990 Planning Commission memo). These items were addressed one by one at the May Planning Commission meeting to provide general guidance to the developer. A workshop subcommittee was assigned to meet with the developer, staff and residents to address in a less formal fashion the details of each item. - The workshop subcommittee met on June 4, 1990 in a staff/planning meeting for seven hours and again addressed each planning issue (see attached staff inemo to file dated June 6, 1990). Based on these meetings, the developer has provided a new landscaping and grading plan for screening along I-494 and Mendota Heights Road and a new site plan that includes an inventory of major trees affected within the condominium area, Wetlands setbacks, definition of driveways and a new layout. We will attempt to convey to you the results of the workshop and highlight the developers response on certain issues (see letter to developer dated June 6, 1990). DISCUSSION The purpose of tonight's meeting is to review the developer's revised plans and to formulate comments for the City Council's July 10, 1990 meeting. We have listed below each of the sixteen Council issues to be addressed, as well as other specifics that are interrelated to the Council issues. l. Bufferincr along I-494 and Mendota Heights Road The developer has submitted contours and cross sections prepared by Brauer and Associates to demonstrate the intended screening. These cross sections are intended to integrate with the previously submitted landscaping plan. Regarding the buffer along I-494, the Indirect Source Permit, approved by the MPCA, states that the highway noise can be addressed by a combination of berming and acoustical design. •The developer is showing berms of at least ten feet (10') inheight and the City's Noise Attenuation Ordinance provides acoustical standars to be met. 2. Traffic impact on Hampshire Estates The workshop discussed this issue at length. They considered moving the Lockwood Drive intersection with Park Lane to offset it and discourage through traffic. This idea was abandoned. Also discussed was the possibility of making Park Lane a one way street. The Police Chief was requested to respond to these two alternatives and his memo is attached. 3. Wetlands Encroachment The developer has moved several of his buildings to reduce the number of Wetlands Permits required. The revised plan shows the following buildings to be within the 100' Wetlands setback: Townhouse #39 90' Townhouse #33 70' Townhouse �36 75' Lot 2, Block 2 95' * Lot 3, Block 2 85' Lot 8, Block 2 75' Lot 9, Block 2 85' Lot lO,BloCk 2 80' Lot 16,Block 2 40' Lot 17,Block 2 80* * All single family Wetlands setbacks are shown without decks . Building number 8(coach home) and the recreation building were moved to reduce encroachment on two ponding areas that are not officially on the City's Wetlands Map. The workshop had directed staff to review any grading in the Wetlands setback necessary to construct any of the above listed buildings. A revised grading plan has not yet been submitted. There are three stormwater outlets exiting into Owens Pond. There was a concern expressed about oils and salts draining off of the� asphalt and directly into the Wetlands. This proposal is schematic only for the utility layouts. Final design could incorporate oil and water separators, sumps at the outlets or some other method of treating stormwater. The ponds to the north, in Hampshire and Copperfield, do not include oil and grit.separators and to staff's knowledge, there have been no problems. � ' 'fr , � 4. Redistribution of Townhomes and Condominiums At both the Planning Commission and the workshop, Mr. Putnam has indicated that he believes this layout, with the revisions, to be the best layout for the site (see May Planning Commission minutes). The revised site plan, dated 6-15-90, shows Building #8 and the reareation building readjusted to minimize impact on two ponding areas. This resulted in the elimination of four condominium units. This plan also shows the earlier revision of condominiums to townhomes along Mendota Heights Road. There are now 70 townhomes and 276 condominiums. The townhomes and condominiums have been adjusted slightly around Owens Pond area to minimize impact on a grove of Oak trees and to improve the driveway and garage layout. Along the private road bordering I-494, the garages have all been moved to the north side of the private drive. 5. Detached c�arages, outside storage, garbage storaae As requested, the developer provided plans of the detached garages at the May Planning Commission meeting. The garages were shown to be 22' x 22', adequate in size to park a car, provide minimum of fifty square feet of outside storage and room for garbage containers and recycling bins. 6. Parkinct The revised site plan shows 2.5 parking stalls per unit equally distributed. All the parking for units abutting Mendota Heights Road are to be screened by landscaped berms and plantings. 7. Quality of Construction The quality of construction and exterior materials is proposed to be similar to the existing Manor Homes. Exterior materials being proposed are brick and aluminum siding. At the workshop, the Planning Commissioners present emphasized to the developer about the idea of quality projected into the condominiums to appeal to the residents, the developer will be prepared to discuss this matter at the Planning Commission meeting. 8. Details of sidewalk and trail construction At the workshop, Mr. Putnam indicated that the private sidewalks are proposed to be paved exposed aggregate. Five foot (5') wide public sidewalks are proposed adjacent to the public street and bituminous pathways are proposed within the park system adjacent to Owens Pond and linking to the single family development and Hagstrom-King Park. The Association would maintain all sidewalks including the.sidewalk adjacent to the public street. The City would maintain the bike trails within the park system. 9. Adequacv of street right-of-wav and cul-de-sac sizes and public vs. private streets It is common within Planned Unit Developments such as this to have private streets. The City has already allowed private streets at Victoria Highlands, Eagle Ridge and Ivy Falls Townhomes. We can see no reason not to continue that policy within this development. The Fire Department reviewed the adequacy of the street right-of-way and cul-de-sac sizes and feels that they are adequate provided that on-street parking is not allowed. 10. Access to vacant land in Southeast corner of site The developer has stated that the property owners affected by this access prefer the private easement concept, however, written confirmation of this has not been received. 11. Prohibition of lona term rental This is a legal question and our attorney is preparing a response to be available to the Planning Commission the night of the meeting. 12. Garage setbacks The developer has attempted to maintain a standard of fifteen feet (15') setback for garages along Lockwood Drive. There are three instances where there is less than fifteen feet (15'). These cases were caused because the developer is attempting to stay away from I-494 and the grove of Oak trees along the western edge of Owens Pond. 13. Planning issues raised bv Gerald Duff.y The City Planner has prepared a response to Mr. Duffy's letter. At the last Planning Commission meeting, the Commission provided a general guidance on the City Council issues so the developer could prepare an overall response. We have briefly highlighted some of the City Council issues above, and the developer will be prepared to more fully discuss any of the issues, or others, the Commission wishes to address. i ' ACTION RE UIRED Conduct further review of any af the City Council issues with the developer, staff and public and formulate recammendations ta the Czty Council. JEDf KLB : kkb ,. + _ . . . � C�ity a� � .;�.,� . �, . . .1��i�ndo►ta ��eigli�s � � Jiane 6, 1990 Dick Putnam Tandem Corporatzon 2765 Casco Paint Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Dear Mr. Putnam, Thank you for your pa�ience and caoperatian during the long meeting that was held here at City Hal.l ori June 4, 199Q t.a discuss the planning concerns raised by City Cauncil and the Planning Commission regarding Phase II of the proposed Rensington PUD. It was nat aur intentian ta go until 7:3� p.m., hawever, i beiieve the meeting accomplished its goal af delineata.ng responses to the planning issues that have been raised.� - � The.purpose of this letter is to indicate to you specific requests far response, as a result af the meeting, that you have been� directed to provide the Ca.ty as part of your general respanse ta items listed i.n the May 18, 1990 staif � memo, to the Planna.rtg Commission. I have attached a copy of this memo. The re�ponse should be directed to city staff by June l8, 1990 in order- to allow. for a staff and planner review for the June 26,• 1990 Planni.ng Commission ineeting. � � � - At the meeting,.you were asked ta address, respond to�or consider the following listed items. . I. The Minnesota Pollution Cantrol�Agency's guidelines far noise buffering alang I-494 should be adhered to and identified in the plans. Areas along I-494 that do not adhere to the guidelines should be identified. Consider moving the lone garage that is sauth of the private drive and abutting I-494. 2. The buffer along Mendota Heights Road should shaw berms wi�h a 3.1 slapa, appraximately five to ten feet (5t - lOf) high, aesthetically attractive, undula�ing with plantings and other amenities, with sigh� lines at intersections maintained. 3. Provide a better definition of private drives and driveways. Consider the elimination of dxiveways onto public streets. 4. The slopes and grades inta the ponds as�a safety concern for yaungsters should be addressed. 3:1 slopes.were recommended and cans3.deration of barriers was suggested. Tlze grading around and �he setbacks to the Wetland areas should be identified. ._.... �. �.� I101 Victoria Curve •�endota Heights, 1�.N - 55I1$ 4v2• 18v0 � 5. Drainage into the Wetlands areas should be addressed. . 6. Tree inventory or analysis of existing trees and the intended status of these trees. 7. Minimum distances between garages, buildings and parking stalls was discussed and the suggested standards are: - 20' betweeri garages and buildings � 10' between garages and garages 15' between parking and units Identify areas where these suggested standards cannot be met. 8. Shingle plan showing relationship between garages and buildings. 9. Exterior materials of better or best grades or gauges. Demonstrate the quality of the exterior materials. 10. Written response from the single fainily homeowners in the Delaware and I494 area regarding the preference for private drive easement into their property or public road access. In addition to these requested areas of response, you stated at the meeting that your attorney, John Bannigan would be responding to Mr. Gerald Duffy's letter of May 15, 1990 submitted to the City Council. In�addition to the list above, city staff was � requested to respond to a host of related, or corresponding issues. If you feel any of the listed items are incorrect, or if you need any information from the public record please contact us at City Hall. This letter spells out my understanding of the specific requests made of you at the June 4, 1990 meeting. These specific requests should be addressed as part of your overall response to the Planning Commission. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 452-1850. Sincerely, F��-�-„ ^ Revin Ba.tchelder Administrative Assistant cc: Revin Clarke Tom Boyce Ji.m Danielson � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 6, 1990 To: File - Planning Case No. 90-03, Centex Homes PUD From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant(� Subject: June 4, 1990 Staff/Planner Meeting DISCIISSION On June 4, 1990, at the direction of the Planning Commission, city staff inembers and the City Planner, represented by Dahlgren, Shardlow and IIban's office, conducted the bi-monthly planning meeting with the developers of the proposed Kensington PUD - Phase II. This meeting was for the purpose of reviewing the developers response to planning issues discussed at the May Planning Commission meeting. These issues are outlined in the May 18, 1990 staff inemo to the Planning Commission, as well as additional issues raised by the Planning Commission. The meeting occurred from 1 p.m. until 7:30 p.m. Those in attendance at the meeting were: Mike Dwyer, Planning Commission Daniel Tilsen, Planning Commission James Danielson, Public Works Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant Phil Carlson, Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban - Planning Consultants Kevin Clarke, Centex Dick Putnam, Tandem Corporation Dan Blake, Sathre-Bergquist Kathleen Connelly, Attorney - Siegel, Brill, Greupner and Duffy Laurie McNamara, Resident Don Pacdernik, Resident Tom Smith, Resident At the meeting, staff directed the developer to prepare a response to the planning items that were discussed at the Planning Commission and in the staff ineeting. This.response was requested to be delivered to the City by June 18, 1990 to allow staff and planner time to prepare a review for the June 26, 1990 Planning Commission meeting. The attached letters indicate the areas in which responses have been requested for staff review. , � Mendota Heights Police Department Memorandum June 14, 1990 TO: Jim Danielson �FCCvin Batchelder FROM: Dennis Delmont �ij � SUBJECT: CPntex DiacLSGion In reference to our di•scussion yesterday about the configuration of Mendota Heights Rd., Park Place and Lockwood Drive, I would offer the following two comments . •�- .-- .�,. .� . - One-way streets are generally used when the amount of traffic available are lacking. Parallel one-way streets are more efficient in areas of extremely high traffic, or areas that experience "rush-hour" type peaks. Marking Park Place one-way would cause confusion, additional policing needs, and would eventually prove very tiring for the residents. In addition, it would hamper emergency response into the area, and create more danger for residents if emergency providers have to go the wrong way on a one-way street to cut their response times. • - . - . .... . - � - -- .� Most traffic accidents and violations are intersection related. The idea of off-setting these streets actually creates an additionally intersection. People who somehow conceive of Park Place serving as a"short cut" to somewhere, will use it as such anyway. The typical off-set of 300 ft. does not create a sufficient distance, and the result is two separate intersections that conflict with each other, as well as causing the normal intersection related hazards. SL�ar'V' The plan that you showed me in our meeting yesterday presented the most logical, aesthetic, and, in my opinion, safest configuration for the two streets. My only comment would be the inconsistency of having an intersection of streets with different names. Possibly, you could consider changing the name of Park Place to Lockwood Drive, or vice versa. •• 7 06/22/90 '15:18 P�NII�iG REPaRT DATE: CASE NUM6ER: APPLICAi�i�. LOCA7IQN: acrlo� t�auEsrm: - • r �� -,us �- . �, : • � tr- s� !��i.. USCT, INC. � 2b June I990 9fl-03 Centex Corp4ratiott South af Mendota iieights Road, North af �.94, West of Deiaware Averroe Csee sketch) R�zoning Frnm R-I, R-lA, � a-3s � w� � a�,a MR PUD, Appraval af Preiiminary Plat� Wetiands Rermit, ar�d Condition� C]se Fermi� fnr PUD At the Flt3nnii�g Comtrt'ssslaris d'n�ectiory t.he C�y Staff toc�ether wi'ih s representat�ve of the �iy�s pIanriing ca�ni� and LwQ rriembers of the Pl,annir�g Cammissian met witF� representatives af the neighborh�d gmup 8rai the develaper irt ar� st,�empt to address � plannirig corjcerns raised by �he Gity �ouncil and Pl.anrung �vrnmission durir�g their Iast respe�tive rneetir�s. FoiLowing thi,s worl�fiap mee#ing, the city i.ssued Iet.�er to t.�ie deveLoper da�ed Jc�ne b, 1990 which sumrrtartzes t.hose specific issc.ies ta wlzYCh the tJevelcger wgs dtrect.�d �to respuc�d. We w�ere direc�ed by � Clty Staff tv review plarts srtti Infarmatian submitted by t�e develaper for sdeqc�acy based �on the items identified f� the same �ur� 6Lfi Ieiier. Ir� addit3o� we were duected fi.a adtlr�ss i�e foliawing specife item� 2. Review acxi quar�ify tfi� amount uf storage provided far each mul�ple ucu% exclucfing sto�ge withict the ctn'st, tor complianr.E with Section I.il.7(7) of fihe Zornng Ordireancs_ b. Respond to the May i5, I99U Ie�.ier submitted ta Gour�cii by Gerry L�nffy. c. Review Sectifln 19.ZC6� af the Ordir� and summarize its reieve�ce with respect to PUD projects generally and tt�is profect specifcalLy. L We wi11. begin our review with Ytem 1 sbove. Enciosed with ttiis repart is a sketch illusi�atirg a typic�I 2 csr garage �s propos�d by Ceritex Ha,r�es for the Ker:sir�gton Phase II developmen�. The ske�h was p�epared based on ir�armatiaa obtairc�d from the developer r�gardin� the a�side dimensloris af the propvsed garage.s ar,d i�fiorn�atian fr�m �he severrti� addition of Architsctural. Gr2�hic Star�dards �egard'irig average car dimes�siores. Sorrr� assumptiarrs - were made in prEp�rr.c�g ��e sketch. First, it was assumed ti�at the garages would b� divided sic�e the plan ealls for ane �a.rage per uru.�. Secor�ciiy� we 2ssumed ti�at storage wuuld ordy occur toward the rear at the garage in arder ta allow far UG/22/AU 15:1$ Gen��x Corpc►ra�ian, C,�se IV,o_ 9t.I-Li� USU. INC. �s -.�i�� unabsi=ruc�ed ac�ss ia fhe �car doors and free movement v� �.he doors. i�i7irci, the sketct� is intended io shaw the poteritiai for starage wi�hin the typica.I garage assumir�g an average mid-size veE�ir_I�. Ti�� sSt��t.c�Ye ill,ustra� tha� siigfiitly aver 5� S� of storage area eacists in a gara�e with an outside dimer►slot� of Z� feet by Zi �e�t assumi� ttz� t�rnditi4res described abuve. SeCt.iczn ia«i(7j itx th� !�1`CiitcanCe r�quires 50 SqttBre ieet t�f s�.or�g� �o be provided avtside vf the unit. This star�dard �s gecie,raLiy ir�eryded to provide addit�atta� storage far trae�i�arsat. apar�tner� tyge urii�s wiyere i.n �iue past very 3�mfted s�i'gg� w�s px'avld�d ws.ttizin tize uru�. It�dcsstcy s�andards hav� r�tartged sigrt��icattLly wit.�i r�sp�ci tc� starage asui cl,svs�� spac:e. �v%re storag� space is t�ei�g provided withiri ttcs ur�its wt�il�h Iess�rts #fite rfeed fnr � r�mute �rn�g� #,itat was ottce n��ry. 2. Fc�r �espot� to Mr. Duffy*s �ett�r of May 7S, 1998 s�e the et�closed m�rno tv the Planr�ng Gamrriission. 3. Seetion I9.2�6a} of the arc�rt�nce provides the Citj+ with �e mea�s by whidz tu allaw subs�anisal variacx�:s frocn tize pravisiaris of fihe urdir�rice irt�,tu�ru� ctses, setbacies„ i�igi�t snd s3mil� regt�Ia�.a�ts. This $eCtioa dves no� cov�r parking requirf,..�man� �ff s�reet load�ng, or s�er�ssary �'ids�aplrpg. Th� inter� �f i�tis sed�n is ctear�y t� sugport the � sta�emetit a� pEs�os� aL tI7e begir�ing uf tfi� �'lanr�d 'LInIt Oeveiopment s+��tion vt the �r�scra�nce. Tbis s�f:emer�t ert�ourages flexibiliLy in � d�siga srnrni d�vei,opmea�t of Ias�rl. Th� reasan bei,ind this ir�nt is rel�.t�d to t.fie reatiiy 'fhat cI.us�r d�v�Iop��ni, whi�i, Is one af the P�P� �FAI�a�ons af PLfi3 2atung, 9eneral.ty reqciu�;s w�risant:es from f�ie : se�if�a,etc reqctirementas of Rtvst ardirrar�s in arder to achieVe the des�r�d dettsity at'td �te fhe more� corapac� urban feel whidz is #�he L-rac%rr�ark of suci� deve�pmeert� � is iypical t� permit matxy such mir�ar varzances wt��r� r�vievsrirtg a PlJD proposal. 4. We revi�wed the r�r�r�� plar:s su6mitted by the derrel,oper �'or campliac�ce with th� issues dis�ussed at the �un� 4, i990 staff warkshop. The new plans irtclude a revisiorzs �o the I.�nds�ape huffer along Mendtsta %-Teights Ro�d. These pzar►s acczrmplish the abXec�iv� outlirred in ti�e Ietter from t{evin Sa�chelder t� Ntr. Putnacn. The �ioA� u� #-he taerms has be�n reduced to 3:i ared retaic�irx3 wai[s hav� beert ct�iliz�d ar� the �insids of tt� b�rrrt ta aIlaw �e gradual slop� Co i� orlect�.ed tc�w'ard Mendota i�tei�ts Raad. ii7e �Ceig�t t3f th� berct7s t�as been ret.a"�t�ed at a rr�inicrzum of 5 feet« It is diifi�I� �n rcarnment on the landscaping on th� revise�d b�rms sPr�ce{ r� plans were icticluded. t-tawever, the el�va�or� pr+aviderl ared the previaus iands�ap�e � pla�s indi.cate adequate butfering. S. T�e plans stlLi �arttain tt7ree private driveways wizich access directiy onf�a Lackwaad Drive arid �ree wfiid� a� ontv. �ar�curd Way. Thes� eirive� r�iresent a ts�f�'r.� c��f�€c� and should be z�eorier�ed t� en�er anto ort� of t.h� t:�mb�r�eci driYes a�r priva� stare�ts i# possifbi�. Ir� addii�iory �ice,re a� several piac�s � wiiere parkang spaces are Iocat�d witFiin a few feet of f1�e g�r�ge bccildings le�vitig li�tle raotn for Iands�apirig ir� t,hese lacatiar�s. � UU3 ' 0�/22/9U� 15:19 DSti, INC. [�OG4 Gsr�tex Carparation, Case +�lo_ 9iI-tl3 6. Na revised grading pIa adjacent to the pands. the suggested siandard Page 3,. _ n was provided ta 2ddress tne issue of tt�e slapes Hawever, there appears tv be no r�ason why of 3:1. slnpes cannat be +ne� 7. The piatzs we reviewed indicate the Iacation af thase significant krees, wii�in t.he mulfi.i. fiamily • area wbicfi the dev�Ioper believes are mast suscept�is ta damage du� to the praposed ear�sl�uctlon. By signif�carrt we mean hardwoods, Yn the ease ofi the s�jec� pr�perty �ese are mostly varlous speciss of aaks. Most of the signifit�nt vegetatian an . the site accxirs witiiin the area planned for sicsgle faraily devEl.opment. While It is easier to work around veget�ian when develaptr,g siregle f�mlly Iats, it would be �dvlsable to reqcsire the developer to provide a niare detailed imre�tory of the trees '�s ti'tE roa.dways acxi Iats are . staked and • to esta6lish a pragrarn � far preservi�g as matiy of the sigttifit:ant trees as passibie. 8. We htave reviewed tiie plar,s �`ar corripliance with i:he suggested mi�imum s�aczdard far disfiEtt�e between buildittgs. In ti�e cacsse of ocQ review w� discovered a d'rscrepancy in the dimensiocss af the garages which cnade it dtf�tilt ta - qu�ntify with �rty t(egree a€ acxuraey the exact number af instances wiiere t.he suggested sta�tciards ara no� met. Hnwever tlYere w� ryume,rous sr�:as wize,re micior dev:atiar�s fram th� standards ocxur. Wii� th�e exc�pLian af a few instanr.es which we will identify, we do rEat helleve fi�at acty of � de�f"icie�ies cac� be e]imYt'�ted by adjusticig the stsuc�es. We brougi't these maLiers to Mr. Pcr�riam� at�es�iiQn and i�e �old us that he would make the rtscEssary changes arzci provide us with the rev"tsed v�rsian 6efore Lhe Planr�ttg Cosrimissian meef�ttg. Ws bE�YE the mirumurn distsnce b�tweeri uniL-s that face Each other shatsLd be held � at 50 feet. iitere are � places wf�ere this si�ndard is aot met; between bu�kiirtgs 1J and 14; btt�Idings 17 arKi 2� ar�d be�II�rx,1s 31 and 32. i"here were slsa four buildiru�s whi�h were rlaser than �0 feet from the. public ROW.; buildngs 3,4�I4 and 79. � � * E.: . I � • � IJ\�� •� • •� �. •..��/��5�� ` . � .� � . j �' , + �a + � . • •' �. ..� •• � ti � • ' ••�'� �• �.. �� • � '� _ , �� A�+' � . Y w �.w� ' . � ' i . ..--__.�C�Y1 Y�t � ._ •_ • . « __ • .: - � • _� . , • • � �`�' �. � � tir1 . �.�_ . �� .J._ ...__ i ��.�` �• � �n�`i �t1._:..• •�.� � � :j�• •{� �• � � � ' ' ' � _ ' �� . � � ,,t �� t ` \�i ` � � , • "�' . • . � ` ` :. ` � i •` , ,y 4 � � " � • = � �r �� •. � y+ . _' � ` � • �.� . . � � � _ ` ' �� . . .. .� � . . �. �� .«� _ __ . i � ` _' ' • " _ — .�.T_.� . . � � � � ' � - -• ' � ' - • �� . �t �\ . _ _. — �'! t�l! . . ` ' _— - — ' _-_ .—_ ' - • �, . ` . � `-- - . . .� . - ..� - - : _ = . --• • - - - --- -- ' _ L _ - [ b j -�1 � li (�ry t( . � __ ; H— "-- •: •_ . __.. _M' _ - - Y •- � — - - - ' . _ . .�- " _ � _ -' -- r - � = "' � � _ �- _ ... _... , _.. - • -•-- -- -- _.� . , �_ � - � . . . __. -. � ._. _ _ . , � � , - -- • • i � • — - ••- ..._ . ! - -- - � - • _.. ' .. . - . � , • . .. _M � . _ _ _» � � _„_ � . .. � -- �- . . � _ • - • -- ' t r - �--.� : . • : • ..__e� : �r: . �� . - • --- _ . • - - . .. ' --• • --- . . . �.�t�`. - - 11 � � � -- - _. UG/22/94 15:21 DSU, INC. 'C�10U7 M��rtORAtVI:�C3t�1 � �- DAT�: b �ccr�: Z99II 7CI: GitX of M�tt�ota H�ights Pl.anrung Csammission FROM: Tim Malloy, Danlgret�, Shardlaw, at� Ji�an, Ir�c. RE: Cent.ex Corpara.�ian, �ase Na. 9�-�03 Ir� response t.a Mr. Duffy�s I�L-ber d�ted May 1S, i990 w� o�f'�r tft� foLia�rir�c{ commeaz� A, Irt his I.etter A+tr. t3t�ffy sLates t� �� proposed deveiapmer�� daes nat meet tf�e criteria �or rezanirtg fi,�a iaL1C� �r�d he lis�s 6 reasons in suppar� �f this arz�urr�er�t„ 3. Zh� firs� of th�se is t.ita� the propased developrr�8cit is • �c�r�sPster� wif.�i t.he 'City's Corry�reher�,ive P'2an and he ft�rther 7.is�s 6 goais that #f�e �Iasz is incac�istsr� wi��. To res�st de�eriora�iori of the �r�vir+o�,nen� Here Mr- I�uffY P'urp'orts t.irat thru� rca:tz�ai wetland area,s are� el�mirra.ted by #�e prnje��. We o%�r the �aldow.ia'tg tc3 ciari�'jr the �acts with respect �o �he wsfiiands issue. Ther� �rp��rs t.c! Or�glr�aiiy %aYe been rtir�e w�e�tarxi srea� fitv� of which are inc�r.a�ed an the Qiy's Starm• Wat.�ac �3rair�age PI�n (Figt�r� 12 ��e �atn� FIa�. AI.i uf these are p�:serv� Y�t tfte tz�rr�nt p3.arr�, twu in KeresirYgt�n . Phase i anci i:hree in the �astern pt�ri�un af Ker�sir�on Ph�se iT �n. th� Park ar�d s�ngl� f�mily area. Ar�other twv w�tlar�d areas we hav� iderriit'ted as having been remov�d for Cotzstru�t�an of I--�9�� and not as a re� of this prt3jec�.. 77ie Iast two areas were not iden�i.fied i� the Storm Water L"�1�airYage P.ian, bu� havs nsver�hel�ss been ret2�t�d irc th� iat.est revised �lan in tl7e fvzm of art aesthet�ic por�ding area.. . Ta ge�tu�te qualit�+ xestderttta! developrnent and ,. ma�n�iri #.t�te extst��g residecttisl ar�as of the Gi�y. .. . Here i�tr. i3uffy argues �hat i-he pru�ect ��ils �t cocnP�Y wYth a suPPartirxg guideline ta this go�I wt�idY d`trects tf�e Gity to prt�vtde a+dP.s`rrable residentiaL Iartd use p��tert� t.aking ir�a ac�our�t IarMi which has uru�suai sail condifiians. The lst:ter gaes on �u li� several. of • t.he s�ils ca�egvri�s found �n the Dak�ota Cot�aty Saii ��Surv�y snd �eir , d�ve.tapraea'� Iisniiatiorts. Firs� we _ rr�ust say tha� fiie Cnunty So�.I Sttrvey is it�ertded as a g�r�aLized g�de ar� . - is bas�d o� ar�alps�s of high altitttde aeriai. phato�izy. Thts irrfarmatioc� is frequer�tiy no� fieic� ch�cked at'ttF not corisidered �, reliable. Planning Cvmmissior� 26 Jur�e 399a ircdicat�on of site speci�c sail. conditioRs. Senondly, virtually aiI saiis have some limit.a.tions with respect to canstruction and soil correction is camrrcon in major construction prnjects. Tt7irdly, many of t�ie sails limitatior,s Iisted in Mr. Duffy� Iettsr are re,I.a.ted to cancerc�s far sepf:ic sys�ems which Fs nat appiicable to this develogt�er�t sFttce the praject is intetZded to be serviceCl by ciiy sanitary sewer.. Ficrally� wher�ever consirucfion c�cccss in an area, a car�ful process of testang saiIs ar�d reviewing pIans and soil baririg infvrmatian with the Gity*s engine�r'u� s�ff is a�ered to. Further, buudtng perrait Sre not fsstred unLFl any nece�ary saiIs correctiar=s sre camplet�d ta the City's safi�sfactior,. Ta ertable the mavernent of persorr; artd gocds withirt th� �ty Fn a safe, envirocunen�Il.y �r.cegfi.able m�rter. The traraffia anticipated far this ar�a wiieri the origina[ Sautheast Ar�a Stttdy was dor� asscrm�d a density fugher ttian that ccareritly proposed and ariticipat�ed in this purtion af the Gity. At those hlghEr de�sit�tes it was det.ermined tt�at the roadHray sysEerrs in the area would be adequa� with Lwo mirtor cot�ditions. First, that ihe Fntersectlon af M�r�data Heigiits Raad and L7add Road would eventually reqeiir� a tratfic lignt ana poss�ly �dat�arrat r.ltrn ianes. S�cot�d, that addivarrai capaeiLy t�ay be rtee�y a� Decorah and Dodd as a result of deveioFment in the area wh£t� is riow tiec.wp�ed by ths Gtipperfteld develupment. Mr. Ott%fy sIso rai..4ed some cornxrr�s aboat �e pafi.et��ial adverse effecfis of trafF�c reIated ta F�.gan� develapmertt plans. NWA's ex�rartsion p�.ans are on Etold pen�.rig their decision related �o the ia�a.tion of their Air 8us cot�struction facilitj►. if that plant is built in Miraiesota, we u�erst.and the S�ate has said i� wiJi assis�. NWA with �he �pproval? friaricic�, and cac�stTuct[on of nec�ssary in�rchange impravemen�s ta serve tJze Eagan Corporate Headquarters site. �f this accurs, it wilI 6e the bca�den af the �roposers �f �at project to mitigat.� advers� traffic candif�iacts. ihere is tjo sp�cifiC plar� or even a sgecifc Iacatiac� for a new o� impraved inf�r�arige. The City cer%ainly cannut derry fhis agplic�tion based on asstsmptlons abaut the passiiiiIitjr af its cumbirted efFects with possif�Ie fu�x.�re develvpmer�ts t�at are in ariather corrimtsrttty and setbjeet to at� at�s�endmer�t to a tull FederaL Ernrironme�a.[ impact Statemer�t, S�ate ir�direcE Sourc� Permit, City Flanried Unit Ueve,Io�irnent, Metrapolitan Goc�ctcii Appraval uf Ir�erchsnge �vtodifi�ati.ac•y Mr�Oi appraval af Gearrtetric Desigr� a�d Acc�ss P�rmits. 7�o prnv�de �he apf,iciaum �mour�t �f active and passive •open space �or the �J�yrnert�. af aIi i+�tendota t�eights residents. vo::.<i:+v 1J:LJ uJ��. 11V1.. ,�YdVV�L Planning Comrrussian, 26 aur,e 1990 We dan`t believe anyorie is ar�uirtg tha� this pro jeai does rtot proVide the Ciiy' wii-h its S3�are of public open space. Zhe re�I argt�merit here seems to be how the Aubli� apen space is used. Mr. Dutfy is statin� the �here is �ot ena�sgi� diversity �n the facilities planned for the park. There may be some argumerr� ti�at more tot iat facilifies or qttstruCtUted op�n play space should 6e pmvided. Howaver, fhe deci.siotls which have rnsulted in the faci.iities whi�h 8re ct�s�ntly propased have been made after carefvl calIaborat�on betwe�n the City�s Parks Committee 2�rt8 the develoger. To pravide the selwlc�s arzd facilities �tecess�ry for tt�e proteetion af privaf:e a�d publi� pruperty in �he Gity. in itis letter Mr. DcrEfy r�fers � a Iarge storm wat�r reterr�ian portd wttY�ft is Ia�ated in subd'istrict IA in the City's Storcn Weter Qrait�ag� Pian (figurE I2 of Campreher�ve P1an). Here sgairy as in mctctt of his distxtsston relaied to wetiands �ugbnut tha Ietter tvlr. Ouffy simply does not have his facts straighY. iiie I,arge �and to which he refers Is acivauy iacated siightly west of F't�2se II iri the easbern .portion af phase L Not onLy is this pond preserved as part af the praject but its �2p2eity Is actually plan�d ta be iacreased. Ta preserve antl �nhan�e the riatural beauty, uruquer�ess, artd attraeti.v� appe-arar�ce af the camm�nitY- The I.et�er i,isL�s �fnca suA1��4 9+aidelic�s which the projec� is reported to be contrary to. i'he Ia.tt�r three guidelines refer o�ce again to th� oblit.eration of wettar�s. As f�as be�n previously stated, Mr. Duffy, or his Iegal assistatit, or whoever co�ducted the review o; �he wetf.and , issue, has failed to under$tznd the facts correctly. The fir.rst of t.�ese supporting �uideliries relates to the issue af aircraft naise. Here �F'ie Ietrer states that . the development of mult%famil.y hausiru� 3n ths glide path of the MPLS-ST Paul Irzterr�a%iorTal. Airport dim�rushes txte City's argumer�t agair�t increased a� tratfi,c. Hawever� the practice of aliow�ng multi famYiy houslr�g wit.i�in the less impact�d r�atse zar�s is weli esta6l�.shed arid is bas�d on siudies whi�h show that people wi�u Iive ir� multi family housing tertd t�ot to er�gage ia outdaar le�.sure actitvities as much as thcse who prefer siru3le famil}� hames. Ia addii-a.un, because af fhe eco�umies of scaie ir�heren� ia multi fami�y hous"uig dev�Iaprriect�, the riec�sary saund mitigatios� can be pravided. Lasf.iy� t.fie proposed pr�jeCt is Ivcated itt 1Vorse Zur�e iV, � whicb is t�e 1.east restricti.ve of the zarc�s, and in fact permits ' even sir�gle-famiiy develapment wh�a proper consirc�c�vn techr�iques ar� uCili�d ta reduce in�riar soc�nd Ieveis by 25 decibel.s. P'.G�liftif2+C,� Ctt(TitX12SSLOt�is Z6 �une Z�9L� 2. itt� second criteria is that th� prolect sites tsz�iqt�e r�attsral 3. 4. �for rezorrir,g eo does nat provzde ameruties. � pua ..wn;�, r�. a�f�y S�L�� for the preservatioc� o�f the 'I he pr�pc�sed si� plar� preserves a�i. of �z� wstlands identi�-�.ed in fi.xte City's wetland irnet�tary. The praject als� pr�serves irt �e fvrizi Qf an aesthetie pond �ra smatt intermitten�. wet areas whicYt ar� r,o� ideR�fed. Whil� s�me bass a� vegeta�Yon is ir�.vi�abie wii�h any developrnert� tI� propased pro�ec�. is i�id ocsc wi�i the specifi.� int�nt of wnrtarx� arourui the sites nat�ral vegetatian. t7rie of the pritstary advantages uf aitowir� develuprrtestis such �s the a�e proposec� is ta trarwfer the der�sit� frcm �s ot" a site wi�uci� coc�in sigsu�cant arr�erufiies to ar�as � ths P�P�Y wl�tir� wouLd be iess affected. In � case af th� pi�posed deYelc�gment Lhe placi Iaca�s Y� l�ast der� deve�pmed� in sreas where f,he mast sigruf'ican� amer�ities oc;cur. Specific�.ily, the sir�gl.� tasniiy por�%n af the plan is located w%� the most sigrufxcant vege�a.�ion is found. in additioc� in �he area where mctl�i-f�ily dev�l.�opmecrt is to accur, t�t� d�velttper has Id�n�ified oct f:he r.u�.xertt plan ii�►ose signi�"icar+� r.r�►.s wfi%ch due to �i'ieir tor�aYian are i�n s-he grea� cianger of be�ng ci�cnag�d. T�e in�ent is tt� pr�re as many ai tize.se i�cess �s passiiaie. in o�her wa�.Yis, �he gra�,osed p�ar� does gr�ciselX wha't ��iatu�ti ur,It d�velopm�� pro�ss is inY.ended ia do. Mr. Uufiy aisar siat.�d iha� tY�e praje�t do�s nat �,armoruz� with suraruunding deve.Iu,pment. Sp�eif"tcally ' it�r.tffiei�ret f�ctifering atong Merrdoi-� H�igi�ts Road is ci�ed, as is b�Sf�ari� fr�rrt �he ad��cert� recr�atitttt ar�as. We have reviewed th� current ptar�s ��d believe th�t the bufferit2g a.Ia� tvter�data Heights Road, cor�.,is�ir�g of berms S fe� high or gFeat�ri, Garnbit�d with significant �andsca�ing, is atiequate and shotsld proviri� an attractive residen�iai. edge 2l,png �he sou'th s�de v� Mendo'�a Heigfits Road. With regard � thE spac�ng actd buf�ering be��r� the recreation areas and th� units �ere are some plac�s where the units are fairl.y cic,� to fi.i�e act�ive recre�tian sreas. �%i.� may be partict�iarly import�ar�t wI� �he units that fat:�e tize ends o� tize soc�er �ield wf�e�e stray balls r�uki et�er the yard� o� t�e' ad�3cettt un3Es. However, thes-e at-�as �art be lands�aped more heavil.p �o triitSgat.e ihi� sii�tinri. Cri�eria 4 sugges�s �i-iat the density calct�la�i�pr�s are perf'or�med incor�c�Iy. The Ci.Ly Couttci2 h�s four�d �t-ta� �he der�.fjr nf ifie praposed �ra,jerx is cor,s�ste� wzti-, �ce • intent af the C.�mpreizer�sive Fk�n az�d #�as i�eec� �a%ulai:�d i+n �ie crr�cmer ailowed in the flrciina�ae. S. Thi� p�rt.ion af Mr. Duffy=s Ietter su�gests tha� �c� praject rinnc mtt rnnrriinai-p with Yha C�e)-��tiviainn f"lrriin�nr�a Pianrung Cor�i�crtission, 26 Ju� �.990 �� Sectian 19�2(4) requires orily that �subdivisian review b� carried aut strnc�tarteausly with PUD reviaw_ !he PUD Ordinance speeifcaliy states as its �rimary objective the encnuragertient vf flexibility in �te desigr+ and deve,Iapment of 1�t�d Yr+ order f:o prornote its appro�riate use. ivir. Duffy pnints aut that the mir,imum radius of a Cul-de-Sac as found in the Suf�divisian Ordi.nance is 49 feet.. A raditts dimensian tif .36 teet is used far the Cul-de-Sars on t(ze priva�e sf�ets within the projeet. This standard was alsa tt�ilized on the private sirests in Phase i. T[�e City's F"u�e Marshal has reviewed the pI.aris for bo�h phases anrl indicat.es �a� he has no prublem with the 3b fvot dime�ort. Mr. Duffy also pvints ou� that the 60 foot radius ROW is m"lssir�g. This is due to tire fact that ti�i.s is not propased to be a platted public stae�t but. ra�r a pr'ivate stree� 6. The firiai iterrt discxissed wi� r�speci to compliance wi�h the Compreher�ive Pian rela�es txi the� fact ti�a� Ordir+ance reqi+ires �omp7iance witi� all vther deveIQpment ragulatioris in tlYe Drdit�ar� whiCit gre ctot alr�ady �overed under the regt�latiorts ir�► �he PLtp or Caridit.�ar�al use sections_ Speci-Fically the pruject wauLd requae a we�3.ands permit. i'f�e r.rrteria for gran�rag such a permit are found itt Sec�i,an ? of the Wetland Ordir�ance. These cri�eri� r.�r� be iisbed as part of the cocid'tioris af fihe Cotxfitianai i.1se Permit and as we review tite pl�n would not present an iruttrmauntable abstacie to the d�veIupment af t.[-te �roject. Mr. Ouffy's camments with regard to this issue are �nce BgaiR based an �fie ir�accurat.e assump�on tt�at wetiand are�s are beistg �lled. t�ione �f the wetlac�ds identi.fied on �he Gityts Offcia.L Wetlarids Map arE beirt� eiirni�iated aRci the Lwa arEas whiet'i are beir�g aitered 2re rlot on ti�e w�tlands map artd are therefore not cavered under �he • regttlations in the Ordi[ianCe. FttrtFier, thase two wet areas are being preserved in the form vf an aesti�,etic pondFng area. Th� p�oposed development .daes not meet �he �Fiteria for apprnvai af a L�JFz The criteria list.�d fiy Mr. Ouffy in this �ar�on af his Ietter are interided as r�uideli,ries for determirung ti�e apprnpriatensss of a req�tes� for Gt+�di.ta.ottai Llse Permit. In the first item af this portiac� of Mr. Dufify�s IeLter he clairris that praject represents a d�fzicreen� ta the health safety and ger:erai weif2�re of the • cammunity. He bases this on tus estitnate f.h�t at lODQ peapl,e per squar� �nils ti�e proj�ct will cant.ain 3t1 percent of the City*s papul2.tion aR 1 pet�cent c�f i:i�e iand area. first, his calculation is simpiy srecnrrect. At 1.OQt� peopie per mile and with a ct+rrent popul�tic+r� af approximately 90ati ar:d a land 2rea af ruughly 9.8 square miles, the carrect estimaie would be approxicnate.Iy I.�. pece�� af the people on Ixi pee�ctt a� the Iand. Se�ndly, evsn at � irec�orrect esi:imate of�.red by Mr. L7uffy thls Iev�i uf densiiy in rm way represents the ldnd af prc�iortians whi,�-i ��Id be cor�sidered a hsalth ha��ard. • UU!'L'L/2lU� la:Za uJu, tivt,. .yJvi� Piaruu�g Cvmmission, � 26 � Jaree I99a With regard to the sta.tement �regarding proFerty values, nezther Mr. Dc�ffy nor anyane eise ta our knowledge has offered any evide�e tt�at the propased project would have any s�grufcant effect on the surrnunding ar�a. Penple appased to developrrzent propasals wili often s�t.e that they "Just knaw" that the prajeet wiil I�ave a • deiaimen�al effect art their property vai.ues. It is quite armther matter ta provide exper� �est�.morry, or otIzer factual. basis ior suppor�.irtg these claims. Mr. Duffy's fi�I �gument is based o�i the proposed developsnen�s failure to meet ce,rtain i�chnical requirements of t�he zocung ordinance. f�rece aga.in we refer �u the purpose s�atement irt the PUD s�tion of the ort]sr�a�e whict� states "The purpose of tfie Planned Urut DeveIapment is to er�co�sage the �lexibility in tfie design and .development of Iat�d in order �n pramate its apprnpriate use". Wi�ile we fe�I there may stiil be a some design detaiIs� to �nrork out, we bedi.eve the pian generaUy represents a gaad solutian wtuch is cansi.s�tlt with the ct��e�t Comprehet7sive Plan. . :.ity o�� ,, ,� 1V�endota ,Heiglits June 22, 1990 Mr. Dick -Putnam Tandem Corporation 2765 Casco Point Road � Wayzata, MN 55391 , � �iS2.Z,c,;;r+ t Dear Mr . Putna�m : G v,(� ,� � l,S t7 W -2 �� -�n.� Your application for a ,�r-e ��,..� _��1�.-f will be considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, '�v„-� 2CQ� The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, C�..c3'-t...� � Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb cc: Mr. Gerald Duffy Siegel, Brill, Greupner & Duffy, P.A. 100 Washington Square, Suite 100 r Minneapolis, MN 55401 Mr. Tom Boyce Mr. Kevin Clarke Centex Real Estate Corporation 5929 Baker Road Minnetonka, MN 55345 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 � 452-1850 . CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 22, 1990 To: Planning Commission From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistan�� Subject: Proposed Findings of Fact Submitted by Kathleen Connelly DISCUSSION At the April and May Planning Commission meetings Commissioner Duggan inquired about the inclusion into the minutes of proposed findings of fact offered by Mr. Gerald Duffy at the March Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Duffy had requested that his proposed findings of fact be included in the public record. Staff received the proposed findings of fact on May 24, 1990. As part of the public reoord I am forwarding these proposed findings of fact to you. � . • RICHARO SIEGEL JOSIAH E. BRILL, JR. JAMES R.GREUPNER GERAlO 5. DUFFY WO00 R. FOSTER, JR. THOMAS H. GOODMAN K. CRAIG WILOFANG JOHN 5. WATSON WM. CHRISTOPHER PENWELI MURRAY R. KLANE SUSAN M. VOIGT BRUCE HEDGCOCK KATMLEEN A. CONNELLY STEVEN L. SCtiECHTMAN� ANTHONY J. GLEEKEI SHERRI l. BRICK BRIAN E. WEISBERG BY MESSENGER LAW OFFICES SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER & DUFFY, P.A. FORMERLY GROSSMAN, KARLINS, SIEGEL 8 BRILL SUITE 1350 100 WASHINGTON SQUARE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 TELEPHONE (612) 339-7131 TEIECOPIER (612) 339-6591 May 24, 1990 Mr. Kevin Batchelder Mendota Heights City Hall 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota Re: Proposed Findings for Inclusion in Planning Commission Minutes Our File No. 17,218-D-001 Dear Kevin: RETIREO M. L. GROSSMAN, P.A. SHELOON D. KARLINS, P.A. �AOMITTED IN WASHINGTON ONLY As requested by the Planning Commission on May 22, 1990, enclosed please find the proposed findings prepared on behalf of our clients for inclusion in the minutes of the previous Planning Coinmission meeting. Please be so kind"as to circulate these among the Commissioners. If I can provide further information, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, � / Kathleen A. Connelly KAC:mkf Enclosures cc: Tom and Beth Segal Be it resolved that the Planning Commission recommend ta the City Council that the Requested Action be denied for the following reasons: l. The Plan is incansistent with the Mendata H�ights Camprehensive Guide Plan for the site and as it pravides for density in the area guided MRfPUD in excess of tha� allowed. 2. The Plan is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Guid� Plan for the site as it creates pockets of extremely high den�ity which pock�ts exceed 8 units per acre. 3. The aation requested is not consistent with the goais, intent and purposes of Mendota Heights' Land Use Plan: a. Ta encourage develapment which will be sen�itive to the natural beauty and terrain of the area; b. To encourage development an an appropriate scale for the area; c. To facilitate the rapid, safe and efficient �ovement of people and commodities; d. To make provision for anticipated future transportation needs; e. To create a system of transportation which clearly reflects the �pecial objectives of the Ci�y, as evidenced in lana use patt�rns, by sesking to pravide a full range of transportation facilities for use by pedestrian, cyclist, vehicular, and rail traffic, with due attention to aesthetic, recreational and utilitarian needs; f. To allow more sensitive placement of structures in order ta retain and enhance natural amenities as well as providing a mixture of hausing types; g. To emphasize in PUDs the aesthetic relationships between the various elements as proposed and the adjacent areas; h. To guide residential growth in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan so that they can be properly served by public facilities and in order to retain the character and quality of the community; i. To design neighborhood subdivisions to ensure adequate access within and between neighborhoods for public safety and service vehicles; and j. To create a pleasing living environment and a level of community facilities and services corumensurate with the needs and desires of local citizens and to indicate how these are tied to other elements of the Comprehensive Plan. � 4. The plan does not comply with Section 19.2(1)a of the City Zoning Ordinance which requires a PUD to be consistent with the Comprehensive Guide Plan. 5. The Plan does not comply with Section 19.2(1)b as it will require the destruction of significant terrain features some of which provide a sound and aesthetic buffer from I-494. 6. The Plan does not comply with Section 19.2(1)c which requires it to harmonize with existing adjacent developments. 7. The Plan if fully developed will further aggravate the traffic problems in the area which include a level of service of F projected for the intersection of Dodd Road and Mendota Heights Road, the most likely route of traffic coming to and going from the site. -2- 8. There is insufficient space available in the area for adequate recreation for City residents, this project will add 431 families to an already overburdened area. 9. The Plan will result in 13� of the population of the City being located on less than 60 acres. 10. There has been no comprehensive look at how the loss of the previously planned 45 acre park will impact�the City services. 11. There has been no consideration of the impact of the development on Mendota Heights Road, with respect to park traffic, high school traffic, and Northwest Airlines traffic. ' 12. Insufficient consideration problems of safety due to future school and children crossing Mendota Heights Road to reach parks. 13. Most neighbors were not residing in the area in 1987 when the density change was_approved, because no homes were built, and they need a chance now for input especially since a large number claim to have relied on plan A, single family and park. 14. Environmental impacts have not adequately addressed in current documents (ISP/EAW). -3- CITY OF MENDOTA IiEIGIiTS MEMO May 18, 1990 To: Planning Commission From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assi ta��`- Subject: DISCIISSION CASE NO. 90-03: Centex Homes - Rezoning, CUP for PUD, Preliminary Plat, and Wetlands At the May 15th City Council meeting, the Council conducted the public hearing on the Centex application for rezoning and conditional use permit for planned unit development. After substantial discussion, the public hearing was closed. By a 4/5 majority (nay: Mertensotto), Council endorsed the Comprehensive Plan which is currently in place, finding that the proposed density conforms to the Plan and that the park plan is appropriate. Council referred the Centex development proposal back to the Planning Commission and directed that the Commission focus its attention on a number of specific planning issues, not related to density, which were raised during the public hearing. Those issues are as follows: l. Buffering along I-494 and Mendota Heights Road to provide the transition on Mendota Heights Road between the multi family units and single family development across the road; 2. Impact of traffic exiting the area, specifically from Kensington to Hampshire Estates; 3. Wetlands encroachment, specifically with respect to the wetlands permit requirements; 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Redistribution of townhouses and condominiums within the development for more suitable distribution within the site; Whether detached garages are suitable in Mendota Heights and this proposal, including requirment that the developer provide drawings showing the detached garages; The issue of parking and adequacy and appropriateness of off- street parking proposed, including screening issues; Quality of construction as proposed for the development and compatatbility with the existing housing in the southeast area; Deta�ls of sidewalk and trail construction; C '� 9. Adequacy of street right-of-way and cul-de-sac sizes; 10. Garbage storage; 11. Driveway easement as opposed to street access to the residential properties southeast of the site, specifically the lots owned by Kennedy, etc; 12. Possibility of prohibition of long term rental on manor homes and townhouses; 13. Quality of construction - exterior materials on the structure; 14. Garage setbacks from the right-of-way; 15. Public-vs-private streets; 16. Planning issues raised in G. Duffy's May 15 letter (a copy is attached) as being inconsistent with ordinance requirements, itemized in summary form as follows: a. Screening of parking areas along Niendota Heights Road by use of four foot fences; b. Driveways are to be less than 50 feet from street interseotions; c. Unenclosed parking areas must be less than 40 feet from streets; d. Minimum parking space dimension -- "in many cases, the dimensions comprising a parking space are 1/2 in and 12 out of a' garage" e. Principal buildings housing two or more dwelling units must be no closer than 50 feet from each other. INFORMATION The public record is quite extensive regarding this matter and the Planning Commission has previously been given most of the material regarding the Centex proposal, or was present at its creation. Please bring your information, maps, materials, etc. If you no longer have your copies please contact me and we will provide it for you. The following information was either included in the City Council's packet or was generated at the City Council meeting or is relevant to the planning issues raised above and has been included as attachments: l. May 8th City Council memo including Southeast Area Study Matrix and recent City traffic counts. For references to the N d Study Matrix, Concept A mostly closely resembles the Kensington proposal. 2. Klayton Eckles, Civil Engineer, April 19, 1990 traffic study. 3. Police Chief Dennis Delmont's review of the Kensington proposal. 4. A March 22, 1990 staff inemo that highlights the planning considerations, including the Wetlands permit and map. 5. A letter from Gerald Duffy, legal counsel for the neighboring residents presented to the City Council May 15, 1990. Staff will have additional information available at the Planning Commission Tuesday night. Public hearings, at the Planning Commission and at City Council, have been closed and formal notification is not required, however, staff will be in contact with representatives of the parties involved. City Council has referred the matter back to the Planning Commission for its review of planning issues. ACTION REOIIIRED •' At the direction of Council, review the Centex application for the planning issues identified. � RICMARD SIEGEL JOS�AH E. BRILL, JR. JAMES R. GREUPNER GERAI.D 5. DUFFY WOOD R. FOSTER, JR. THOMAS H. GOOOMAN K. CRAIG WILOFANG JOMN 5. WATSON WM. CHRISTOPHER PENW£LL MURFAY R. KLANE SUSAN M. VOIGT BRUCE HEOGCOCK KATHLEEN A. CONNEILY STEVEN L.SCHECMTMAN� ANTMONY J. GIEEKEL SHERHI L BRICK BRIAN E. WEISBERG l LAW OFFICES SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER � DUFFY, P.A. FORMERIY GROSSMAN, KARLINS. SiEGEL 6 BRILI SUITE 1350 100 WASH�NGTON SOUARE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 TELEPHONE <612) 339-7131 TELECOPIER (612) 339-6591 May 15, 1990 City Council of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota Councilmembers: RETIHEO M. L. GROSSMAN, P.A. SHEIOON D. KARLINS, P.A. �ADMITTED IN WASMINGTON ONLY We�represent a large number of residents of Mendota Heights who, as you are aware, vigorously oppose development as proposed�south of Mendota Heights Road east of Dodd Road and West of Delaware. These residents represent diverse interests. Among their number are nearby residents, but ..a-lso included . are citize�s of the City, Who have. come to believe that the City is trading away civic amenities such as parkland and quietude for no reason, to the detriment of these and future citizens. � You have heard from us and from our clients on numerous� occasions, verbally and in writing. We now wish to take this opportunity to restate our opposition to Centex Corporation's plans for the Southeast Area for the following reasons: The Proposed Development Does Not Meet The Criteria For Rezoning To Planned Unit Development. Section l0A of Chapter 401 of the Zoning Ordinance provides that a rezoning to a PUD district must satisfy all criteria listed in Section 10A.2. These same criteria are reflected in Section 19 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on the public record and such additional testimony to be offered at the public hearing on this matter, the criteria are not satisfied in the following respects: City Council of Mendota Heights May 15, 1990 Page 2 l. The proposed development is inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as found by the City's Planning Staff. Chapter 401, Mendota Heights Code of Ordinances Section 10A.2(lja and 19.2(1)a. Specifically, the goals stated in the Comprehensive Plan with which the proposed development is inconsistent, are given below: Goal: To resist deterioration of the environment. A supporting guideline directs the City to do so by providing for maintenance and further development of natural ecological systems including lakes, ponding areas, acuifiers and drainage areas. The proposed development provides for elimination of three natural wetland areas on the property. Goal: To perpetuate a quality residential development and maintain the existinq residential areas of the City. A supporting guideline directs the City to provide a desirable residential land use pattern taking into account adaptability of the land which has unusual soil conditions. The plan fails on this count because the development scheme requires the land to be leveled out the wetland areas to be filled, and-placing �.arge 24 unit structures.directly in the. area of wet soils. The soils on this site are described in the United States Depa•rtment of Agriculture's Soil Survey of Dakota County, Minnesota (1983) and building li.mitations given as follows: Jewett silt loam - If buildings are constructed on this soil, foundations and footing should be designed to prevent structure damage caused by swelling and shrinking of the soil. Quam silt loam - This soil is generally unsuitable for buildings or septic tank absorption fields because ponding is a hazard. Kingsley sandy loam - Buildings constructed on this soil should be designed to conform to the natural slope of the land. Rato silty clay loam - This soils is generally unsuitable for buildings or septic tank absorption fields because of the flooding hazard. City Council of Mendota Heights May 15, 1990 Page 3 Auburndale silt loam - This soil is generally unsuitable for building or septic tank absorption fields because ponding is a hazard. Chetek sandy loam - Buildings canstructed on this soii should be designed to conform to the natural slope af the land. Refer also to the Soil Constraints Study attached to the DSU Southeast Area Study for confirmatian of the above-described limitations. Goal; To enable the movement of persons and goods within �he City in a safe, enviranmentally accep�able ma�nner. The guidelines require the City to maintain and develop streets so they are capable of handling anticipated traffic volumes Safely, and to avoid isolatian af neighborhoods. .The proposed development has demonstrably failed to address �he ability af these roads to handle the traffic to be generated by the residential and recreatianal uses in the development. The proposed development alsa badly isolates a large number of.residents.at•the f�ar south of th�.pzoperty providing.no alterna�ive access than a long road among rows of densely packed multiple dwelling units which do not create a neighborhood. atmosphere. Goal; To provide �he optimum amount of active and passive open space for the enjoyment of all �endota Heights residents. Guidelines for this gaal include the provision af usable park space for each neighborhood, establishment af recreational facilities usable by a12 age groups, and acquisition of development� rights to preserve open space. The plan for development provides na recreational resources for small children; no playgrounds, na playfields; and what little there is far older children puts the children at risk from traffic into and out of the praject. Rather than preserve open space, the City is being asked to permit the obliteration of wetland areas. Goal: To provide the services and facilities essential for the protection af private and public property in the City. The City•s Storm Water Drainage Plan indicates a large ponding area in Subdis�trict lA, which is included in this property �Figure 12 of Comprehensive Plan}. No such pond appears in the current development plan and its absence has nat been adegtia�ely addressed. Cit� Council of Mendata xeights May 15,'1990 Page 4 Goal: Ta preserve and enhance the natural beanty, uniqueness, and attract,ive appearance af the community, The supporting guidelines applicable here are: . - Work to diminish and contra3 noise pollution. As indicated by Mike Dwyer of the Planning Commission and Mike Gannon of Mendota Heights Citi2ens Concerned for � Qui,eter Skies, the placement of high density hausing in the glide path to the St. Paul-Minneapolis airpart horribly undercuts the City's argument that increased air traffic and noise is unaccepi�able in Mendota Heights. The City shauld refuse �o p1.an far aad around an increase in pollution. -- Protect and preserve natural water drainage, water recharge areas and water ponding areas. The propo,sed developznent destroys these. - Enforce. the•We�lands Ordinance to ensure �that wetlands, ponding areas and natural drainage courses are managed . . . • _ . . .. and -ptrotQcte.d. . Th� .pr.oppsed d,eyelopment destroys . .. _ these. - Adopts standards ta limit and manage filling its affect •on wetlands and related water resource areas. The proposed plan is in direct opposites ta this guideline. 2. The PUD does not provide for the preservation af the site's unique natural amenities. Chapter 401, Sections 3.OA.2 (1} b and 19.2 (1}b. With the removal of trees, grading and filling of wetlands, the basic nature of this property will be cri�ica2ly altered, not preserved. . 3: The PUD does not harmanize with surrounding development. Chapter 401, Section� 10A.2(1)c and 19.2(1)c. In �he vicinity af the recreation areas there is no buffering such as wii1. insuiate surrounding neighborhoods from traffic and parking intrusions. The buffering along Mendota FIeights Road is insufficient. 4. The density calculatians are performed i.ncarrectly. Rather than all.owing a transfer of development rights from what little we�.land is nat being destroyed and rather than � City Council of Mendota Heights May 25, 2990 Page 5 including prospective parkland in excess af 1��, the calculations of allowable density ought be performed �o give meaning to the Camprehensive Plan manda�e to "controlled growth.'" Chapter 401, Section� 10A.2(3) and 19.2.(3). 5. All P].anned Uni.t Developments are required to coordinate with the Subdivi.sion Contral Ordinance. Chapter 401 Section 29.2(4), Mendata Heightsr Subdivision Ordinance Ghapter 301 provides: - That m3.nor streets must be planned so as to discourage � this use by non-local traffic. The cul--de-sac at.the southeast corner of Lackwood Urive is directly opposite af the bal2field area. As ballfield users loak for parking cl.ose•by the fields they will turn dawn the cul-de-sac resulting in heavy use and parking on residential streets by nan-residents. They� will alsa use the small interior loop adjacent to Interstate 494 far the same purposes, greatly overburdening the already scanty parking avaa,lable to residents and . augmenting use of the local streets far non--local . . � traffic., . . Chapter 30�.,. .Se�tion 5..3.j2),., . . ,. - A minimum 49 foot radius for cul--de-sacs is required. However the radii for the cul-de--sacs in the multiple • dwelling unit area of the proposed develapinent are only 36 fee�. Also these cul-de-sacs are comp].etely lacking the 50 foot radius right of way. Chapter 301, Section 5.3 (2) . � - Section 5.3(6) directs consideration of a alang 2nterstate 494. If the ballfields deep w�.thin the develapment, aiternative frantage road ought to be implemented traffic haaards in the residential area. Section 5.3(6). frantage road are to remain access via a to draw off Chapter 301, 6. The PUD must comply with other applicab3e portions of the Code. Chapter 401, Sec�ion 19.2(5j. The praposed development requires a wet3.ands permit, governed by Chapter 402, Mendo�a Heights Code of Ordinances. Iiowever, this prapased development cannot meet the standards far issuance af a permit. � City Council of Mendota Heights May 15, 1990 Page 6 - Dredging and/or filing•shall be located in areas of minimal vegetation. The wetland areas proposed for filing are thickly vegetated with grasses, reeds and other aquatic vegetation, all of which would be destroyed by this project. - Lowest floor elevations must be at least three (3) feet above the highest known water level. The plan does not meet these requirements in the vicinity of wetlands. Refer to developers submissions for elevations. - No development is permitted that will endanger the public health safety or welfare. By now it is well known that wetland areas serve an important function in filtering contaminants from groundwater. The loss of these wetlands will deprive the public of this valuable health and safety promoting resource. . - The wetland permit may not be issued unless there is provision for treatment of runoff prior to release to drainage for parking areas and land uses which ... .. ..... . ._ ..manufacture .products �.ikely. .to contaminate groundwater. We have seen no provision for such treatment. �� The Proposed Development Does Not Meet The Criteria For Apt�roval Of A Conditional Use Permit. Section 5.6 of Chapter 401 of the Mendota Heights Zoning Ordinance sets out the criteria for approval of conditional use permits. The conditional use: 1. Must not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community; at 1000 people per square mile, this part of Mendota Heights will contain 30� of Mendota Heights population on less than 1� of the land. In the Municipal Services Demand projection report dated August 21, 1985 numerous errors in the Revenue Projection portion which are sheer carelessness lead us to lack confidence in the City's conclusion that the additional service demands to be generated by the development can be paid for out of revenues. City Council of Mendota Heights May 15, 1990 Page 7 2. Must not cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards; the ISP for this site projects traffic level F for the Dodd/Mendota Heights Road intersection. The status of the Delaware and 494 interchange is thrown into controversy given Eagan development plans adjacent to the freeway and this proposed high density development. These inevitable traffic crises have not been planned for as required. 3. Must not seriously depreciate surrounding property value. Neighboring property owner's testimony regarding the deleterious impact of the proposed development on their property values has been offered. 4. Must be in harmony with the general purpose.and intent of this [zoning] ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development fails in this regard for all the reasons stated previously. The Prot�osed Development Fails To Meet Technical Rectuirements Of The Zoninct Ordinance. Chapter 401, Section 10.7(7) requires a minimum storage area ��,,, of 50 square feet per dwelling unit, exclusive of that � a provided in the unit. No outside storage of garbage is% g� permitted. The developers have not demonstrated that thesel requirements have been met. Section 10.5(7) requires that the parking areas along Mendota Heights Road be screened from the homes across the street, and from the single family residential lots by 4 foot fences. No plans the neighbors have seen show such fencing. Section 10.5(4)_provides that no driveways are to be less than 50 feet from street intersections, yet plans show numerous drives less than 50 feet away from these intersections. Section 10.5(2) provides that unenclosed parking areas shall be than 40 feet from streets, yet plans show parking area much closer than 40 feet. mot-e 0 City Council of Mendota•I3eights May 15, 1990 Page 8 10.5�1j provides for minimal parking space dimensians. Thase mi.nimums ar� not met, except in a theoretical. sense. In many cases, the dimensians comprising a parking space are lj2 in and lj2 out of a garage, • i0.4{2jc prahibits principal bu.ildings housing twa or more dwelling units from being within 50 feet of each other, yet this prohibi.ti.an is not adhered to in the plans. Based oan �he foregoing we respectfully request that the Council deny the applicatzon far Conditi.onal Use and Wetland� Permi�s, Rezoning and Planning Plat. Yours very truly, .��2'� Gerald S. Duf GSD: mkf h '� . AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 May 22, 1999 Page 8 In response to a question from Chairperson Morson, Public Works Director Danielson explained that at the time the subdivision was being considered the developer showed lot pads in this position and that it was the decision of the Planning Commission not to grant a blanket variance and to consider each one individually as they came forward. Chairperson Morson pointed out that a Wetlands Permit was granted to the property to the north. Commissioner Koll questioned what the blue stakes are on the property and Mr. Mangini answered that they are survey stakes. Commissioner Duggan moved to waive the public hearing and to recommend to the City Council that they grant the Wetlands Permit. Commissioner Koll seconded the motion. Chairman Morson called a recess at 9:00 o'clock P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 9:07 o'clock P.M. CASE NO. 90-03 Chairman Morson stated that the City Council CENTEX HOMES has referred Centex Homes request back to the Planning Commission level to review items of specific planning issues. Chairperson Morson explained that the items to be discussed will follow the format of the memo submitted by Administrative Assistant Batchelder dated May 18, 1990. Bufferinct Issue Mr. Dick Putnam introduced Mr. Dan Blake, engineer on the Kensington project from Sathre-Berquist. Mr. Putnam briefly reviewed previously submitted landscape plans. Mr. Putnam explained the changes in buffering. He explained the changes in height with respect to the earth berms and plantings along I-494 and Mendota Heights Road. Commissioner May 22, 1996 Page 9 Tilsen questioned how the earth berms would be maintained. Mr. Putnam responded that the intent is to not have maintainable slopes. He further explained that the berms would be irrigated. Commissioner Tilsen questioned if the berms designed along I-494 would protect homes from the sound from the Highway. Mr. Blake responded that the Pollution Control Department has guidelines. He further explained that there is an elevation separation between the Highway and the buildings. He explained that the buildings are approximately ten feet (10') higher than the road. He also stated that the berms and the garage units are between the highway and the units and provide buffering. Mr. Blake stated that there has been no formal analysis to whether it meets the Pollution Control guidelines. Mr. Putnam stated that they are trying to stay within their property lines. He stated that it would be advantageous to build a berm within the right-of-way. Chairperson Morson questioned if the setback is great enough to allow 3:1 slopes for all berms. Mr. Putnam explained that the streetscape should vary and that there not be just one height all across the road. Mr. Putnam stated that they could take a further look at reducing the slopes. Commissioner Tilsen questioned if an attempt could be made to meet the Pollution Control guidelines. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that she would like to see a new plan which might allow more space among the buildings. She further stated that she would like to see an upgrade in the quality of the buildings that would allow more of a buffer along Mendota Heights Road. She stated that she would like to see a more relaxed plan. Commissioner Krebsbach further stated that she would like to see more green space with respect to the ponding area. Chairperson Morson questioned if Centex would be willing to install fences as suggested by Attorney Gerald Duffy along Mendota Heights Road. Mr. Tom Boyce responded that they would like to stick to landscaping the area. Traffic Impact May 22, 19�0 Page 10 Mr. Putnam explained the traffic impact on Mendota Heights Road and in Hampshire Estates. He explained that they used a factor, as discussed with Klayton Eckles from the engineering department, for the manor home units they used 6.5 trips for coach homes; 6 trips for townhouses; and single family used 10 trips. He explained that there is about 1112 trips heading west on Lockwood Drive at Mendota Heights Road and 1095 trips heading east on Lockwood Drive at Mendota Heights Road. He explained that these trips do not include the traffic that the park would generate. He further explained the traffic impact with respect to the single family lots. He stated that there would be a total of about 2, 700 trips per day on Mendota Heights Road from the entire development. He stated that they could get together with the City staff and their traffic consultant" and formalize the numbers. Mr. Putnam stated that Park Lane would not be used as a shortcut. He explained that the impact of the traffic at Park Lane is an intersection question as far as turning movements at peak hours. The Planning Commission briefly discussed whether a subcommittee should be formed to discuss the issues in concern more thoroughly. Commissioner Tilsen questioned if the back up of traffic at peak times at Dodd Road will cause people to use Huber Drive as a shortcut. He further stated that a way to minimize the traffic congestion would be to install a signal at Dodd Road and Mendota Heights Road. He stated that he understands that the State has stated that there is nothing to warrant signal lights at that intersection. He questioned if the City and the developer split the costs in installing the lights at that particular intersection maybe the State would allow signal lights. Mr. Putnam responded that it would not be just the Kensington development that would be using that intersection but that other developments use the intersection. Commissioner Duggan questioned the amount of driveways that are less than fifty feet (50') from street intersections. Mr. Putnam responded that everybody in the projects that he has developed in the City sets their garages back at thirty feet � (30' ) . He explained determining what Mr. Ms. Connelly, attorney of Hampshire Estates, counting driveways as areas. Wetlands May 22, 19�� Page 11 that he had some trouble Duffy meant in his letter. representing the residents responded that they were any entrance to the parking In response to a question from Chairperson Morson, Mr. Putnam explained that on the Wetlands map there are two areas as described as Wetlands in the southern portion of the City. He stated that those two Wetlands were removed for construction of I- 494. He explained that those Wetlands are no longer in existence. Planner Malloy stated that Mr. Putnam's analysis of the Wetlands is consistent with the research he has completed. Planner Malloy presented transpariencies of the current Wetlands map. Commissioner Dwyer questioned Mr. Putnam if he has figures showing encroachment of Wetlands. Mr. Putnam stated that the encroachment of Wetlands would depend on the type of the single family home. Mr. Putnam stated that the figures are "pad numbers". He stated that the figures stated for the townhomes are true figures. Commission Tilsen questioned if there will be protection of the Wetlands written in the Association By Laws. Mr. Putnam pointed out the majority of Wetlands that would be controlled by the park and the public. He stated that by the single family lots he will have a scenic easement around the pond. Commissioner Dwyer questioned how many of the existing trees will be removed. Mr. Putnam stated that their intentions are to maintain the trees. He pointed out the tree line around Owens Pond. Commissioner Tilsen stated that the landscape plan does not state clearly that the trees will be maintained. He stated that he would like more clarification of how many trees will be maintained. Ms. Connolly referred to the Zoning Ordinance and asked the City staff to review the requirements regarding maintenance of the trees. Commissioner Duggan referred to Mr. Duffy's letter concerning tree preservation. Commissioner Duggan explained that Mr. Duffy requested a count of all of the � ♦ major trees in the area. they would identify what what would be replaced. May 22, 19�0 Page 12 Mr. Putnam responded that trees will be removed and Redistribution of Homes within the Development Mr. Putnam explained that they feel that the townhomes are a reasonable transition. He stated that switching the townhomes with single family homes is not a good idea. Mr. Putnam explained that construction of townhomes and condominiums in place of where the single family homes are proposed would cause the trees to be removed. He explained that single family homes is the best way to preserve more of the trees. Mr. Putnam briefly explained that putting single family homes along Mendota Heights Road is not a good idea. He stated that the way the road was constructed is not condusive to putting in single family lots. He further explained that the park traffic would work fine with the multi family units who have their own courts. He explained that putting single family units in the area where multi family is proposed would conflict with park traffic. Mr. Putnam further explained that moving single family units next to the freeway did not seem to be a prudent choice either. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that the present accommodations Mr. Putnam has presented does not please the community and that she recommended that he take a look at relaxing the plan. Commissioner Tilsen suggested that the plan could be relaxed by removing two or three single family homes and to push the townhouses over. Detached Garactes Chairperson Morson stated that there are not many detached garages in Mendota Heights. Mr. Putnam pointed out that Devonwood in Bloomington has detached garages and that he has slides available to review. Commissioner Tilsen stated that detached garages can present a security problem and that ownership is more defined if the garages are attached. Chairperson Morson stated that the developer has submitted plans on the garages. Chairperson Morson questioned if there is storage space available within the garages. Mr. Boyce responsed that in the past they have not but that if the Planning Commission and the City Council J May 22, 19�0 Page 13 require them to provide storage within the garages they would do so. Commissioner Krebsbach questioned if underground parking could be considered. Mr. Putnam explained that underground parking does not work with small buildings. Commissioner Krebsbach reiterated that she is speaking to the quality of buildings that already exist in the City with respect to multi family homes. Parkina Mr. Putnam, referring to the landscape plan, explained parking. Mr. Putnam stated that there is 2.5 spaces per unit in the coach homes area. He e�lained that 2.5 spaces is adequate. He explained that there have been a lot changes. He stated that in order to meet the 2.5 spaces for the coach homes they will need an additional 19 exterior parking spaces and that they will do that. Mr. Putnam explained that the townhouses will have a two car garage with a driveway that varies in length plus the guest spaces which will average 4.0 to 4.5 spaces per unit. Commissioner Dwyer questioned if the parking spaces are in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Putnam stated that what Mr. Duffy refers to in his letter regarding Zoning Ordinance compliance is for an R-3 District which is really geared towards a parking lot in an apartment building and that that does not apply in this case. He explained that in this case it would not work because the parking is behind garages just like in a single family home. He explained that that Zoning requirement is not geared towards residential kinds of structures. Mr. Putnam stated that the Planned Unit Development specifically provides that where standards do not work with site planning you vary from those standards. Mr. Putnam explained that the fifty foot (50' ) spacing in between the buildings and the forty foot (40') parking from the street is not appropriate in this case because the Zoning Ordinance is referring to the R-3 Zoning District for commercial lots and apartment lots. In response to a question from Ms. Connolly, Mr. Putnam stated again that the Planned Unit Development allows flexibilty and variances. � AYES: 2 NAYS: 3, ABSTAIN: May 22, 19�� Page 14 Commissioner Duggan moved to adj ourn the meeting to another date and to begin the meeting in discussing the quality of construction within the development. Commissioner Dwyer seconded the motion. KOLL, MORSON, KREBSBACH TILSEN Motion fails. Commissioner Krebsbach moved to adjourn to a special meeting on June 6, 1990. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. AYES: 3 NAYS: 3, TILSEN, MORSON, KOLL Motion fails. Commissioner Duggan excused himself at 11:10 o'clock P.M. Commissioner Tilsen moved to adjourn the meeting at 11:30 o'clock P.M. Motion fails due to the lack of a second. Quality of Construction Commissioner Krebsbach stated that the detached garages and the square footage of the homes are a concern with her. She further commented that she would like to see a more sophisticated architecture and better quality of materials used. She stated that she would like to see the value of the units increased. In response to a question from Commissioner Dwyer, Mr. Boyce stated that the material used in the multi family units will be brick and aluminum. Chairperson Morson suggested that individual Planning Commission members take a look at the Devonwood development in Bloomington to get an idea of the type of materials proposed. Sidewalk and Trail Construction Mr. Putnam stated that they would submit the plans and work with the engineering staff regarding the construction of sidewalks and trails. � May 22, 19�B Page 15 Adecruacv of Street Right-of-Way and Cul-De-Sac Sizes � Mr. Putnam stated that on the private streets within the development there are no right-of-ways. He explained that the cul-de-sac size is thirty six foot (36') radius as opposed to forty nine foot (49') which is entirely in keeping with what was built in the first Phase of Kensington. He explained from the fire and public safety standpoint, it is adequate. Public Works Director Danielson confirmed that what they are proposing is exactly what was approved in Phase I. Garbaae StoracLe Mr. Putnam explained that the garages that are proposed are two car garages or 22 x 22. He explained that the garbage is kept in the garage because the access is much easier and that people like it better. He explained that all of the garbage is picked up in one day and that that is handled through the Association. Commissioner Tilsen questioned if the Association would participate in recycling program. Administrative Assistant Batchelder briefly explained the recycling program in the City. Mr. Boyce stated that he would like to see the Association participate in the recycling program. Driveway Easement Mr. Putnam briefly explained his conversations with the Beales and the Kennedys. He explained that there are two plans, one showing a public street right-of-way and the other a private driveway easement. Mr. Putnam stated that the Beale's will have to make a j udgement as to what they want to do. He explained that the Mr. Beale is leaning towards having a private drive easement of twenty five feet (25') to thirty feet (30'). Lonci Term Rentals Mr. Boyce explained that their intention is to not rent the units. He explained that the financing discourages renters. Mr. Boyce stated that he is unsure of how to prohibit rentals. Mr. Boyce stated that Centex is not an apartment builder. Garacte Setbacks from the� Right-of-Way � • �, AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 May 22, 19�8 Page 16 Mr. Putnam stated that they will accommodate the setback requirements just as they did in Phase I of Kensington. Frontage Roads Commissioner Krebsbach questioned if the development would be better off with a frontage road either off of Delaware Avenue or Mendota Heights Road to the park. Mr. Boyce stated that Mendota Heights Road was designed for a certain amount of traffic. He explained that there really is no problem since this road was designed to handle the traffic that the surrounding developments may impose. Ms. Connolly stated that they are just voicing their concerns regarding the amount of traffic. She stated that they are willing to work with the developer regarding this issue. . It was the consensus of the Planning Commission , that Commissioner Dwyer and either Chairperson Morson or Commissioner Tilsen will meet with Planner Malloy, City staff, the developers, the legal counsel representing the neighbors and any residents of the neighborhoods at the regularly scheduled Planner's meeting on Monday, June 4th to discuss further the issues and concerns regarding Phase II of Kensington. Commissioner Dwyer moved to adjourn the meeting at 12:03 o'clock A.M. Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion. Respectfully submitted, Kimberlee K. Blaeser Senior Secretary* � ��' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 5, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Ass' nt �-l'3 SUBJECT: Case No. 90-21: Batesville Casket Company Variance and Lot Split DISCIISSION Batesville Casket Company, represented by Thomas Owens, Attorney, and Bruce Jones, Architect, are requesting a lot split and two side yard variances in order to construct an office/warehouse on Northland Drive at Highway 55 (see attached staff inemos and plans). In addition to the planning considerations, City Council will also need to take action on authorizing staff to grant the building permit. There was much discussion at the Planning Commission meeting about the building being too large for the site. The Commission also had a concern about the parking along the shared entrance drive. The applicant has submitted revised plans that now show an expanded truck turnaround on Lot 3, a revised grading plan showing berms along Highway 55 and I-494, more landscaping, interior roof drains and improved building elevations. The plan shows a thirty foot (30' ) driveway on Northland Drive which is five feet (5') larger than City policies allow for curb cuts. The developer feels they need the full thirty foot (30') opening. The Planning Commission recommended 4-2 (Krebsbach and Morson opposed) that the City Council grant the lot split. Commissioner Krebsbach and Morson opposed because they felt the building was too big for the lot. The Planning Commission voted 4-2 (Krebsbach and Morson opposed) to recommend that the City Council grant a side yard setback variance to allow a shared driveway for Lots 3 and 4 and twenty foot (20') side yard setback variance to allow a future building expansion along T.H. 55. The Planning Commission, as part of their motion, suggested that Council should look at shifting the building to reduce the need for a variance. � ACTION REOIIIRED If City Council desires to implement the Planning Commission's recommendations, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 90- ,"A RESOLIITION APPROVING A LOT DIVISION AND SETBACiC VARIANCES FOR BATESVILLE CASRET COMPANY". Upon adoption of the Resolution, City Council should conduct a building plan review and authorize staff to issue a building permit. JED/KLB:kkb � �� CITY C3F MENDCt'I'A HEIG�3TS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RES4LUTION NO. 94 - RESOLUTION APPROVING VAROAMCES FOR ANI} THE DIZ7ISIfJN OF Lt)TS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, NORTHLAND PLAZA W�iEREAS, owner of Lots 3 and �, Block 1, Northland P1.aza, Dakota Gounty, Minnesota has requested from the City to divide said lots inta two lots according ta the plan submitted, dated 6-29-90; and T�►HEREAS, the applican� has also requested twa variances, one for roadway setback� for lots 3 and 4 to allaw a shared driveway and one ior a twenty foat {20' } side yard abutting a street setback on Lot 4; and WHEREAS, the City Councii has reviewed said lot division and variances and finds that the requested lot divisian and variances will have na adver�e effect on the heal�.h, safety and general welfare af the citizens of the communi�.y and surraunda,ng 1and. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesata, that the lot division submitted at this mee�ing be and the same is hereby approved subjec�. to the �ubmittal of a Certificate of Survey more precisely defining the new lat I.ine; and BE IT F'URTHER RESOLVED, that ten foat {20'} setback variances be approved for Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Narthland Plaza and a twenty �'oot (20'� for side yard abutting a straet setback varianee be appraved for Lot 4, Block l, Northland Plaza. Adapted by tha City Council af the City af Mendata Heights �.his tenth day oE' Ju1.y, 1990. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charle� E. Mertensotto Mayor t ' i CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 20, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works ir Kevin Batchelder, Administrative A t r� SUBJECT: Case No. 90-21: Batesville Casket Company - Variance and Lot Division DISCUSSION Batesville Casket Company is seeking to relocate from Eagan, MN and has asked Kiesland, Inc. to represent their proposed new development. Bruce Jones Architect has submitted plans for Kiesland showing a 30,000 square foot office/warehouse to house Batesville Casket Company on Lot 4 of Block 1, Northland Plaza. They are proposing a shared drive with Lot 3 due to some severe grades and conflicts with an NSP pipeline utility easement. Lot Division Batesville's proposed development is too large to fit on Lot 4. They propose to reconfigure Lots 3 and 4 to accommodate their proposed office/warehouse. This lot reconfiguration can be done without a public hearing as a simple lot division, if the reconfiguration results in two new lots that totally conform to the Zoning Ordinance's minimum size and width requirements. Their proposal, as submitted, meets the requirement of one (1) acre minimum with one hundred feet (100') of frontage. Approval of the lot division should be subject to the receipt of a Certificate of Survey establishing the new lot line. Variances The applicants are requesting two variances, one on the driveway setback and another on the side yard setback abutting a street for their designated future expansion (along Highway 55). The driveway setback variance is requested for the purpose of allowing a shared entrance for Lots 3 and 4. The City's standard driveway width is twenty five feet (25') at the curb. The plan shows a driveway width of thirty feet (30') and it needs to be reduced to twenty five feet (25') where it intersects Northland r�rive . Due to the wide right-of-way width that exists along Highway 55, the applicant is also applying for a twenty foot (20') side yard abutting a street variance to allow for a forty four foot (44') wide future expansion. ACTION REQUIRED Meet with the applicant, driveway and building setback to the City Council. JED/KLB:kkb review the requested lot division and variances and make a recommendation i i PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION RE�UESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 26 June 1990 90-21 Bruce Jones for Kiesland Inc. Lots 3& 4 Northland Plaza Plan Approval, Subdivision Approval, Variance 1. The subject property is: located east of Northland drive as it curves northward on the east side of Highway 55. This property is also prominently situated in the northwest quadrant of Highway 55 and I-35E. The land is zoned for industrial use several years ago, at which time roads and utilities were installed. While it is currently undeveloped, there is little doubt that this land would eventually be developed since it has good visibility from both I-35E and Highway 55. 2. The applicant is proposing to adjust the lot line between Lots 3& 4 in order to e�large - Lot 3 to allow for the development of an office/warehouse to be occupied by the Batesville Casket (.�mpany. The applicant intends to retain ownership of Lot 4 and develop it at a future date. A survey of the existing lots has been provided by Mr. Jones, as well as a site plan indicating the proposed location of the new lot line between Lots 3& 4. Under Section 11.3(1) of the Subdivision Ordinance, a property owner may relocate the property line between two platted lots without the need for a public hearing if the resulting lots meet the minimum requirements of the Ordinance. In this case both the existing and proposed lots meet the minimum requirements of the ordinance. The proposed lot reco�figuration of itself appears to present no other problems with respect to the developability of either lot. 3. In addition to reconfiguring the lots, the applicant is proposing to provide access to both lots via a shared driveway as indicated on the site plan. This proposal, while it may limit the type of development that can occur on Lot 4 in the future, has several advantages. First, it reduces the number of driveway access points, and thus, the number of turning movements onto Northland Drive. Northland Drive curves sharply in the area of the subject property and this design could help mitigate the safety concerns associated with traffic movements on sharp curves. In addition, this combined access drive could be located, as indicated on the site plan, further from the intersection of Highway S5. This would allow more stacking distance for the right turn lane at Northland Drive and Highway SS and would also reduce the conflicts with traffic coming to and from the subject property. Finally, the shared driveway proposal allows for access to Lot 4 to be provided at 0 Kiesland, Inc., Case No. 90-21 ' Page 2 a point where the existing grade is less severe, thereby avoiding the need for retaining walls or steep side slopes which create maintenance problems. 4. The disadvantage of the shared driveway layout is that it may limit the future development of Lot 4. The single driveway could create on-site traffic flow problems which may limit the development potential to projects that require less parking capacity. In addition, the layout of any potential future development would have to conform to the proposed shared driveway location and elevation. Since the proposed driveway is essentially designed to accommodate Lot 3, which is significantly lower in elevation than Lot 4, there would be additional grading required to develop Lot 4 under ttiis scenario versus if Lot 4 were developed independently. While th�s in no way precludes development on Lot 4, it would make it more difficult and more costly. S. The applicant is seeking a variance from the required front yard setback along Highway 55 for the future expansion of the building. As indicated on the site plan, the setback along this property line after the building is expanded, would be 20 feet. The front yard setback for buildings in this district is 40 feet, and therefore, a variance of 20 feet would be required. The intent of the front yard requirement is to maintain adequate green space within developed areas in order to Preserve the aesthetic cha: acter of the City and avoid the condition where the view of private property from the adjacent public roadway is dominated by structures built too close to the road. In this particular instance there are several factors that should be considered when reviewing the applicant's request for variance to the front yard requirement along Highway SS. First, the subject property is located adjacent to Highway 55 in an area where the boulevard is significantly wider than usual. The site plan indicates a dista�ce of 105 feet between the edge of the curb and the property line. This is more than ample boulevard space even for a trunk highway such as Highway 55. Generally, the ROW along Highway SS includes additional space to allow for future expansion. However, Highway SS has already been upgraded in the area adjacent to the subject property, and we are aware of no plans for further improvements. The 105 foot boulevard together with the 20 foot proposed setback results in a distance of more than 125 feet to the nearest travelled lane. Another factor to be considered with regard to the setback variance is the element of existing or proposed screening to reduce the impact of potential views of the structure. The elevated topography of this site and lack of vegetation between the proposed building location and the travelled lanes of Highway SS make this site very visible from passing vehicles. Put simply, there is no existing screening. The site plan shows minimal landscaping along the property line adjacent to Highway 55. Five linden trees are shown on the pla�, spaced approximately 50 feet apart. In order to provide any meaningful softening of the building in this area, a minimum spacing of 30 feet is recommended. The berm, which is shown on the grading plan, would be removed when the builciing is expanded. The proposed 20-foot setback area is not adequate to allow for any significant berming. Kiestand, Inc., Case No. 90-21. ' Page 3 One final element in the evaluation of the potential impact on the surrounding area, as a result af the variance request, relaies io the appearance of the structure itself. An elevation of the east side af the struciure is provided an Sheet Twa of ihe applicant's plans. This elevation shows the entryway, which is one �of the few archi�ectural ir�terrupiions in ari otherwise relatively typical concrete warehouse. Unforiunately, this feaiure is located on ihe oppasite side of ihe building from Highway fi5 and I-494. No elevation is provided for the west side of ihe building. Hawever, from the plart we can see ihat no windows are proposed for that side of the building, so we can specuisis Chat from Highway SS ihe bttilding wouid preseni a relativeiy monatonous 230-foot-long wall anly interrupted by twa narrow metal bands. The surface t�reatmeni is intended to be vertically ribbed, pre-cast, concrete panels. While architecturalty treated concrete is among the materials permitted for use on building exteriars in the ardi�ance, most of the buildings in the nearby office/industriai area are constructed of brick. There is also no elevation showing the south side of the building that faces I-494. Rs seen an ihe site plan, ihe loadir�g docks are proposed to be located on this side of the siructure. Though this side of the building wouid be visible from the. freeway, no landscaping or oiher scree�ing are provided along the south property Iine. b. The praposed layout wou2d require varianees from Che reguired interior side yard along the praposed realigned lot line between Lots 3 and 4. This is ihe resuii of the faci ihat the centerline of the shared access drive is proposed to be located on the lot line. It would also be necessary to issue a side yard variance for Lat 4 ia allaw the construction af the portion of the access drive located on this lat. Since the side yard setback for parking areas and drives in this district is 10 feet, the variance would be for the full 7.0 feet. As discussed earlier, there are several advantages to the shared driveway scheme from a traffic safety standpaini. 7. In sumrrzary, the iayaut af the site as illustraied t�y the site and grading plans demonstrates that the building is clearly to be too big for • the site. Even after reiacating the property line, utilizing a shared access drive, and laying out the site in the most efficient manner the project still requires three variances to the setback requirements and leaves little space for screening from the adjacerti public roadways, particularly with regard to the view of the loading area from I-494. Further, the building is located on a parcel which is highly visible from both Highway 55 and Interstate 494 and offers little in �he way af aesthetic appeal or landscaping. While the shared access drive af#ers distinct advantages from the standpoint of traffic safety, these advantages are samewhat offset by the complicatians creaied for ihe development of the remaining lot 4. . � � � ( __�� C:E7tTRE P NTE��_J • . • • � , v � � " • 1 _ _ ��, • • • ; . �, . . r �. . � . , __ _ � � • � . . . -_ - - �. • • . . . • -- - i ' � O 1 . • . =_ -- �1 . � G ' �� /// � � ,�� ,i _= _- (� �� : � _ 1 i � 1 - - _ ( �j % i �� _+ - =- - �j � � � � • i ! � "��w � fir f/��a�_ •\ r � i � - � 1 ;� ' � ' --'� _ - ' g� u R E'c�� o N � � • ;�i':�, . J • Q i .. _ ; . _ -- _ e\` , � �; _ _ = . �. t- ,r .cmw+ r» � -� _� � .f -;-� Li�o�'iC '�t� _ � ~. — _ _ "\\\ ! � � / e . �- • — 1 ' -_ � � - . � � � , _ �:�._-� _" \'� y , • 1 � • l ��• _ — _= �� + h 1 ��r• � �` — �� =- _ �� • � �_ . , ceM�rERr � , ; li � ,: � ' ! � � :-= -__--- - � �: � � , ' � . � . , � . � 1 �.__.� • �y . . � / .i % r � { � / �• •�• g � � , / • a4�uso�luw R R: oE / ' � • • • { ',�� - �1 � C-�� '� ! � L • =:"� � "�- � 1; � P � ' 1 � t �; "�, � . y _�= _ - d � �- � „� ti � '.� �„ .�- - � !:I! � � ? � al l: � � � • . • � " _ - �(� � -:�f � 1 �, f ! �� ' • �� 1 1 4 . � ( � �. � � �t� - � � h V 1:r t _ _ - _ , �� ~�' '�l �� ; � arM� � �� 1 _ _ � = n„ r . �.. ; ��` `f; +� __ __ —=- r,��; ; ; = i j�f ,�-= - � � -- _ ;. : , . �, ,.� ; �\ — � i� �'a i w '{ ��= — , � �\\ f � �i ? • 1 _ _ , , , \\ , . J�. J�f � : J,�, i �;=._ _ - ,. � . �; . - . ' - -� �,. - ---- - - — �, f -- - = _ _ �� _�.._._.. \ ..TEp •7 w ° • �� • _ � . , � � \ • � � �. «�•^ — _ �� `\ \� r , ! ��\, `` \ , \ � � �'r �� _ � . � + . / � y � � �� -�r { Si t� ` • '•` i 'M� � � �1 t �-.�f I ,ve� ' , i t' i � , j ! 4 � _, , ; t j� .,, ,� — -• .----- i __� ; ��1�_ _ � _ 1 � ; , � -.,-- . � fr � ; . _ . . .� . � , .� �� ; . ()�, � � .� . � . � \ �' J_ " ' � . i t � "E`°"TS SUBJECT PROPERTY - ~—``��—� � - - - " � . �� .� r°' .i� ; � '' '' �'::: � � � i �► ,,,: � ., ,� .� �;� � W NORTH �.: � ; f- � , �.� �: �=�\�. � ' � .W � � SCALE 1"-800' . � '� �r'. ;' � �\��\\� NBftTMLANO QRtYE � � � , ! � � � \ � � . /tdRTMlAii t 1 • • �I , .� ' ' , - 1� � � � S `�,/( /• ,//' _ . _ ,��'��: \`*� 4 �:. \"�MO`1wiRw St�tlS�fW�4■ CO. �� r t �,,,/' �,�� ,`:�.r�� /f.�- `f �� _•:^,.. _ , `i^f , �'e..:•;'� ''��, '! . .'t�':1 :` � •'�..�� . ��-; . . . � - . � �•., F�::.., , �, j111 r r . .,�.�._'_ ____- - ;=-r'� - :.r--' . - — = - .._ =�� : .. �---_;r--. ' �---: –� . �� , � – – . . . . � -� . . -�. ��.� ;� . . _ : _ . _ . . ., � � �:;. ��. �; . ; ' +} f ;. � ,` ' �-_--.-.../�--�""`�\�\ � `�` �' 1 r�� r '�i' . ' __�� /� �`,\�\- ;��' �{: 1 ` �� . ��`};; '� . , V , � . � T � E 5� / � 010-77 cLES M. �ERRor�l 4�� qc 26 1 Dg- A Pc��o � J �� A� _ � ' _— — / / . \ ! � MAD �I an " I�If...{Jr'f�.v� V�� N tl:J"�VUy ` ^ � • 274 3� 3 _ 7t..v� � �~ �ION 3 � �r . M �N � � m 3 � %- 4 � �j,�s �. Q�' � ' � 3 � �, • ' I I�_ I 4 E �° N,r / �` 375 ,)O � c N O f7 �c •, . ' �' Z � 283. 2 . 4 _ ��., .. � a7 � , 062 2 %8 3 N67°� ,v m ; S 5 S��S,e 5 3?'2 ' " �''�° `�, j� � 2 z•�s'so' 4. 6 a r I^ •Qe � •J � � i.A d•22• '� � � . . �Z��i" O�� q � R.��. e/L/l� � � o � 6: �. r1�. 36a ;, W Z, �� O �� 2 2 y 2�-- -� � . �O 2 �/A/ .� O Y : � Q� Q �3 ��L , � � --� �t.. �J F` aZ= B�'2B'48 �� C� 0.� �C � ,O �� O� ^ � o� � � o ` C � � y �'s �- �1 � `�+� �O 2 �• �y �. 409 S3 '� � � W �� m � W F � e �, .9 . � � ''n � ,, � ' �-�m��o '� .. . . !' F 'a -t� ae 2 �1 �. 9 � o p �.- . � �. `D ZS ,,� � � � q'. � � 2��7' •' �i, � � � S,� / `J _ _"'___'__ ' _' _ ' �"' '' . / 0 M � � 270.�C 3PA R� OF � /% 5 �, G � o /C z !�K -- 268 82- .;� ' WE.ST �'N ti e , PA RT O F^ a:� A=3°5143 �.: , o ' {' ; �r� Q(LI 52.47 : '' o �' "' �� ` ; �_ � m � [ d=18°4g'2�" � p N � � •', ' � • �55 p � � Sa�Q 09 0. b, 1 �abs3e. � ae�=r R��efQp � � rr i' •� 2�0 8�21�6� -- - :.�.�6 A2=8�2�66~ 2: j .1Z6je�� Y19.26 ' . �'e3B332 AZ+269�21�E6•• , " �.,Z=Z�f� •42n / i v 1 - 7R � SUBJECT PROPERTY " NORTH � SCALE 1 "=200' _ '__ � _ . ' ' _' '_ _• ' ' �� ,ti. 1• �-.. 0 = yg' U` a a, /Mry p Z 0 a � 0 a � z Q(y � � {.L. W � a � � � � � a �° W A O � N • z Z � Applicant Name: Address: Owner Name: . .:::: _ .�i:,. '•' . - -, :� ��:: :::. . �� .�. •`Y� _ �'� 't"t,t � r 1Viendota City o€- = -__ Heiglit�s APPLICATION FOR CONSII�ERATION ;.,: ,��: OF �T��'=� �"=;� PLANNING REQUEST � � : � ;',� . . ' � �"'; Case No. �b �� .:: ,.�.. ,:�r::; �,.��. �;� •- � �"�' ' Date of Applic�on —4. IS �� D `�$� U �w' Fee Paid 43S'. � =..�: ;:r, �u s �- ".: d� �� ::;;�, �-� "r�-tit� PH: ldR� --�i �� \,,,�t� � +�'3� '. �j � ;i'.;r.!:�s -<; c� � �� 1+ �ICx (Number & Street) rd':�: �«�� (I-ast) • . Address: [5 'FiV a �V(�- (Number & Street) �y� Street Location of Property in Quesdon: (Flrst) (Iv� ;;; . (City) � (State) (ZiP) d �` ' � (State) (Zip) -d� ' ' ' 1. l. f �� ' � " �i�►i� �s f}T N��ia% � � � _� ' .. � Legal Description of Property: �OTr 3�a �. I�b��j,�� f� Type of Request: ' Rezoning Condidonal Use Permit Conditional Use Petmit for P.U.D. � Plan Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment _ F Variance �_ Subdivision Approval - , Wetlands Permit �-- Applicable Cily Ordinance Number 3�1 -- �o i Section �` Present Zoning of Property � Pmsent Use 171U'D�'• ' � ;.. Proposed Zoning of Property 1'=`" Proposed Use O�F �{��{/��• • yr I hec�eby declare that all statements made in this request and on ddition �� • material are we. '=w.=�' �;�: � . �:. _ " ' .;� � 'ti%��. . (S' e of cant) � _ ,. =G ;.'r,7 fy : . ••`� .,fMa ' \%r•� / `�O . . �_; :•R � �rs`c � �a�� . _ , �.°�.,.•."� �'�_'_ ` - �' . . _ ��`:c ��a's�:: . ' � - x '`�:7; `rj �� • " � (Received by - Tiile) W� �t� . $ "f '. - ' _ , ��'"��' ,�?��` ' ,::r' _ ' - �.:5s ":,�;.. �4: 1101 Victoria Heights;�flViN • 55118 452•1850 �� ,�ONE� Al�GNITECTURE ai 624 HtLLGREST A1�ENUEo�AtNT P�uLvMINNE�tIT�o�511 G�PHONE: G98-9�61 � Qate_ �ur�� 1 �r i ��Q To: Pl anfli n� GQmrni �si ar� � Gi ty G�ur�ci 1 GlTY QF MENQOTA HElGHT� Suba eGt: Lot� 3� 4. �l �ck t. N�t�thl8nd Pl sza �E.aGated at the inter�ectian of Northl8nd Orive and Hwy �5} LETTER QF INTEWT_ �n b�haif of Kie$land incorporated �e are su�rnittir�g Plans for deuelopmer�t af lot� �� 4. Kiesland is a�rell re$pecte� deweloper of indu�trial pr��erty, �ith home offiGe b�s�d in Ot�io. !t is our intent to develop these lat� ta their fuiiest �r�d a��t u$�. Qur de�i�n ca�Glu$ian indi��t�s the �n1y �r�actiGal �ey to �c�omplish thi� is by d��l�Ring tl�e�n togeth�r �s an� unit! witt� ��omr�on driu�. TMis conclusion �sults in a setb$ck vari�nce r�equest. �� base our r�quest an th� ext�m�ly iimited veMiculBr �cG�ssi�iiit� ta �ither 1at. The oniy ac�e��i�le frQntage is along Northl�nd Qri+��. Tfti� fronta�e i� narrow to aegin with �t52' r�at ir�cludin� set�ac� limitations}t and furtMer restricted 6y tt�� steepl� s�ape� �ank along the fast �ide of tMe road end tt�e NSP pi Rei i ne ��e� Si te and Gradi ng Pl �ns?. 1�e f e�l th� 1 i mi ted wi dtt� f�tee� gr�d�s, limit�d treffic t�i�i�ilitt� �du� ta curv�i, �n� id�rttitt� pro�l�rns, m�ke a �c�mr�an dri�� th� Qr�l� �►iabi� optian t�it� th��e t�� l�ts_ Furth�rrrt�re, �r� �Qui d 1 i k� ta �d j ust the RroR�rty 1 i ne seR��ti n� th� 1 ats, i n ard�r ta� hetter bs18r►ce th� t�ra $ites. Y�e al�c� requ��t a setaa�k t�arian�� f�r tf�e W�st @r�perty line of iot 4� aiong H�y. 5�. This r�qu�st is h��s�d an th� narrn� e��sihiiity discuss�d abave, in Yi e� of tfl� extr�etrt�l y�ti de �( i fl5') ri�ht af �ey a14ng �5. Qur� pr�apo�81 consists of initial dev�lopment af lot 4 for B�tesville Gasi��t Co�nper�y� th� nation� i�ading prauid�r of fur��ra1 �cc��s��i�s. Their needs dictate 2�,QOQ sf. of �anehous� $R�G� �nd 2,U0� �f. af affice, and 1Q1L�Q0 sf. of �xRansion �p�ace. Th4l� Wll) S2CV1C@ thiS aUlldlfl9 1f�1t�1 thl'�@ t(1JGk dOGkS 8�td Q�1� t�t^it+@ 1fi-�4Q1: T�I�1C at�Sifl@�S 1� Y�f� 1(1'18�@ GO�ISGIOt�� il� G�@8t1. �1t1�Q 8il� tt'UGIf 8Gt1V1tE� 1S �XR@Gt4d tQ �l? Gutt� trilfll{'1't81. GITY OF MENDOT� HEIGHTS L�tter Qf I nt�nt Pege 2 T�e pr��o��d ��nstru�tic�t� of t�� ete�+riil�� f�cility is ��r�-c�st cc�r�cr�t� wa11 syster� �ith a st�el r�Qf struGtur�. The ext��ic�� fa�ed� v�ill cansi�t ef Rainied cor�cret� r�it�► iflt��rallt� SpRli�d decc�r�tiYe surfece textur�_ This "fi�ld" m�t��i�l will b� �ccented �rith ��fini$hed rr��t�i trim bar�ding and �ntry c�r��py. Th� building will b� aermed ta minimize �all exR��ure �nd the tr��k loedin� erea is M�avily �Gr��ned mitM land��aping er�d berrnir�g. �+e int�nd ta provi�e ou� client �r�d the cc�mmunit� with � hig�t quaiity d�velaprr�ent throuqhout. Futur� deveiapment Gall$ fa�r camp�ti6le offi�� s�a�room � w�ar�house use on lat �. This building �nd t�nn�nt �i11 rrteet ar �xGeed th� quality 1eke1 af B�tesui 11 e. Sincereiyr i ruce es, �tA cop�: Danafid Haupt, fll, Kie�land Bret Pi n�i e, ��tesvi 11 � ��ies�ar�d �- � � �incvrporate�d� - 85Q0 Berk Bouler�ard t Hamilion, Ohio 45015 •(5�3� 874-034� # Frxx {5.Z3� 874-4472 Jnne 13, 1990 Pia.c�ning Department CITY OF 14�DOTA HEIG.HTS,112I]VNESUTA c% Brace Jones, AIA � � Jones Arciutecture . 1624 Hillcrest Avenne St. Paul, Miu�i�esota 55�.1G Gentlemen: Piease be advised that }3rett Pingie of Batesville Casket Company has aathorized us ta proceed with prelian�inaiy review o� a praposed new 30,OQ0 square �aot facility on Narthland Drive, Shauld you have any iiuther questions, piease cvntact me at (513) 874=0345 or Bret� Piugle at (812) 934-$260. Sincerexy, �s4 G� r l ^� D�rnald M. Hangt, �II �� i 3qfi�"` .w . 'm o a 4 �p �• � � :; 3 'x � M �. 37 � � Q A n' '� N �� . y - �Q � �� o¢ a'' oF �Q y� �y � 40 �� • `? /� `a �Q' � c�Q�v �� Q�,��?�9 '. � Q S�F/ rG��Q,��Q�L. . y Q cQ �U1R.V E C��'�E'° S 43' 48 �04"E .. 2sa.ao .... ��J � �� Q�" P4' J4 h� O EX7STING WIRE �ENCE i � c� Yt�'! O SA�' � � r N +y � ' 1 � Q� a p`�' \ '• G R" IC`� s `bq. +�y �f �'��lr : � .a"�:•' �$ � ap�pi/O e� � �q�h QO � /eb : / �J v�,.� . � U �4 , �` $ � :� � =��. g � � c�► o N� ` � � tp--D Q�� ' 182.00 283.12 q It : 550°0012��E 540°31'17"g � a Q ' . � ro o `\ ti N Z Y1 W !- ../ • _T ' � � 4 � � �i 3r 1O } / � � � �2 ss W/ .:r � � ^f`�,\ S 1 Z w Q � p ro/ z �� 4�� p �+ � P try j `l�� Si�J �' o 2 t.,_ ,'!� �af't'�' o v'ni N N � " � 3 `'" -,.._`� � v 1 l. - _ —_.. �'�f �� -_ � � 43g � ' • �`„'- � �� 8t�22`5�u� ` „`�` -.... r . `-�I // / •.��,� """.,, � � `` a "'�-y I � / .... k. � � . ' �. . : tj � v N N vl o V N c �� t� � q tr rq .. _ . � ��l�y O� -. .,,.1.� 1Viendota Heights June 29, 1990 Mr. Bruce Jones Kiesland, Inc. 1624 Hillcrest Avenue St. Paul, i�II�I 55116 Dear Mr. Jones: , `J o�.r t c�,v� c:e-S Your application for a s�•��u�sco�n Lvfs��ill be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, �u �y �c� , � 5� o The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. The Planning Commission recommended � ,�a,�-��o, ( ��{ -2� .� .p � 0� l O�, c9 � v�n c..c i G o�S 1 cxa-ra-� o v� o� 51•�. -t- i- �.� J\ ��<NG ' If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, l`-"'" W � Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KI,B : kkb cc: Thomas L. Owens, Attorney . 1512 First Bank Place Ti�est 120 South Si�cth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN - 55118 � 452• 1850 _. �. . , � "lty O� � -i .�.. .� 1Viendota.�Heigli�s June 22, 1990 Mr. Bruce Jones Kiesland, Inc. 1624 Hillcrest Avenue St. Paul, MN 55116 Dear Mr. Jones: Your application for a Sv��tSuc�+� UQ.��v�c�S will be " considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, �U� �� The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hall �in the Council Chambers. You,. or a representative should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ��.cJ�;�, ��.��-cf _.__ Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb +�„ m � 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 -� _ � ; ' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 6, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant SIIBJECT: CASE NO. 90-18: Frisch - CUP DISCUSSION At their June meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider an application from Mr. Gerald Frisch, 960 Caren Road, to construct a fence on Victoria Road (see attached staff inemos). The main concerns addressed by the Planning Commission about the fence was that it encroaches upon the County right-of-way by as much as fifteen feet (15'). It was their general opinion that the proposed fence is to be behind an existing hedge and will not further adversely impact the road. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted 5-1 (Morson) to recommend approval of a CUP to allow Mr. Gerald Frisch to construct a fence on County right-of-way subject to the following conditions: 1. That Mr. Frisch acquire a written agreement from Dakota County approving the construction. 2. That a survey be submitted showing the proposed fence location and existing facilities accurately. 3. That Mr. Frisch agree to removed landscaping and fencing at no cost to County or City at such time as the City our County improves the roadway. 4. That the existing hedge be maintained. � � f r ACTiC}N RE4IIIRED Canduct the public hearing and if Cauncil desires ta implement the Planning Commis�ion recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting Re�olu�.ion No. 90 - ,"RESOLUTION APPROVING A CUP FOR A FENCE". JED/KLB:kkb1 � .•.,�� y t l r ; �� .+�� i•�K CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FENCE WHEREAS, Mr. Gerald Frisch has made application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for construction of a fence at 960 Caren Road along his east property line within Dakota County road right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 26, 1990 to consider the application for construction of said fence; and WHEREAS, based upon the public record transcribed on June 26, 1990 the Mendota Heights Planning Commission recoYamended to the Mendota Heights City Council that the Conditional Use Permit to allow for construction of said fence be approved conditioned upon: 1. That Mr. Frisch acquire a written agreement from Dakota County approving the construction. 2. That a survey be submitted showing the proposed fence location and existing facilities accurately. 3. That Mr. Frisch agree to remove landscaping and fencing at no cost to the County or the City at such time as the City or County improves the roadway. 4. That the existing hedge be maintain. WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on July 10, 1990 to consider Mr. Frisch's application to build a fence. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will have no adverse effect on the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the community surrounding land; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that construction of said fence would not be adverse to the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Conditional Use Permit be approved subject to the above listed conditions. ! � ��_. s r F '' .�� Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this tenth day of July, 1990. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ' By Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor � , , � � . � p-� City o� - - - ., , � l, � 1Viendota Heig�lits June 29, 1990 Mr. Gerald Frisch 960 Caren Road Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Frisch: Your application for a C l!P � � �-�� will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, `�j,��v�,U . 1�id . The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. The Planning Commission recommended ct�?rav�.� �-� "�� -��ioW�tr•q Cav�.cSi.��lOv�S 6�r� 11�� • �t) (�}�-� �2Y1 APt�+�tSLc✓� �aw+ S�.ko%� Co.,v►�"�I � OGtvP.l �•O.W ,�� .prau�d�¢. Surv�� Sl�ow�ny �te.v�� R•Cj. W. cc.uy P�e��3/ �t�S � s� Gtq s'-� %c� C'etn�ov2 ��'� rC�.� tvti�K�v2� � v�-e v�uz-S S 0.c-y� If you have KLB:kkb c CO N'}' t M V-2 YYi0. � v► ielri Q�'1 G+2 questions, please feel o� ��Sf�r� free to co�tact e. Sincerely, � � Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant 1101 Victoria Curve -1Vlendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 i'0: •� L7��Cif'y �'f'Y� LS G� ' ' .S�$,�� ,_ �C`Y �' � L Go�. T l t� Yl�: f�—�Q-- , ,� �:- `S'4* _ r . ` , FROM: � 2 �J l� �.�.-t-G Luc. L�9.�.r" DATE: �v �r-� � 2c1 . l�'t �. a . ��, S— b�r � Oc l.5 C ls S S L � 1� A.� �(�`-t 'P,c�. V� �'•1 \�q �ys rv� wL l5 S LO Li o n �v we- 2 G 1�c 4 O T_�'1,..� C��k-y 5�4-t l l Ino�.,S �`-!- c-e. [�.�.s-�� I a �r �e� =� c- -��- ��.�. �-��ov,�.� LJ � - ��r nn � -� p c� C..a.d1��-c.5 . W t �na,� �.c e� u�e.� a►� � l o �e.� �S-a w, �_ u 'tv a �-o c�,_s S a�• _ �r-e-v. c� �.Q ('-v..�.,-�` , i� - �' n r d� �'�'� o vto.,� L�-� �e r v�.. ��' � ^�S �� SO�a _i.. � o�r-�.�-�r" �c�o c� a�eA.r o r� "'r�-� �iJ �.i � O �d c� v� c c� � • t�.> o�1 �c9 a�So 5�+q �Z�-S 't" ��"'�-'`` 'i'�-2 S c�rtt2..�I GLt..�% �2. dLGGL' cJv+tiri�n. irc.. T 1 ov1 -t'�ra_ Yr. 1-�.�.o � � u o.. TL./ 12� .�:'GS'� LCX-a-Cy .P �f"to� � \ l�� v v� G t, l 1/�1 �i . ❑ PLEASE REPLY BY ❑ NO REPLY NECESSARY ❑(OVER) ' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 6, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Direc Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis SIIBJECT: CASE NO. 90-18: Frisch - CUP DISCII3SION At their June meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider an application from Mr. Gerald Frisch, 960 Caren Road, to construct a fence on Victoria Road (see attached staff inemos). The main concerns addressed by the Planning Commission about the fence was that it encroaches upon the County right-of-way by as much as fifteen feet (15'). It was their general opinion that the proposed fence is to be behind an existing hedge and will not further adversely impact the road. The Planning Commission voted 5-1 (Morson) to recommend approval of a CUP to allow Mr. Gerald Frisch to construct a fence on County right-of-way subject to the following conditions: 1. That Mr. Frisch acquire a written agreement from Dakota County approving the construction. 2. That a survey be submitted showing the proposed fence location and existing facilities accurately. 3. That Mr. Frisch agree to remove' landscaping and fencing at no cost to County or City at such time as the City •or County improves the roadway. 4. That the existing hedge be maintained. i' � r � ` .' .M� ACTION REOUIRED Conduct the public hearing and if Council desires to implement the Planning Commission recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 90 - ,"RESOLUTION APPROVING A CUP FOR A FENCE". NOTE: Mr. Frisch has not yet paid his fee for the CUP, see attached notice. Any approval should also be contingent upon receipt of the CUP application fee. JED/KLB:kkb1 � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FENCE WHEREAS, Mr. Gerald Frisch has made application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for construction of a fence at 960 Caren Road along his east property line within Dakota County road right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 26, 1990 to consider the application for construction of said fence; and WHEREAS, based upon the public record transcribed on June 26, 1990 the Mendota Heights Planning Commission recommended to the Mendota Heights City Council that the Conditional Use Permit to allow for construction of said fence be approved conditioned upon: 1. That Mr. Frisch acquire a written agreement from Dakota County approving the construction. 2. That a survey be submitted showing the proposed fence location and existing facilities accurately. 3. That Mr. Frisch agree to remove landscaping and fencing at no cost to the County or the City at such time as the City or County improves the roadway. 4. That the existing hedge be maintain. WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on July 10, 1990 to consider Mr. Frisch's application to build a fence. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will have no adverse effect on the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the community surrounding land; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that construction of said fence would not be adverse to the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Conditional Use Permit be approved subject to the above listed conditions. .. . � Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this tenth day of July, 1990. ATTEST: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk , � , . . - , . . C-it o�- _ _ � Y .,, � l,� 1Viendota Heig�lits June 29, 1990 Mr. Gerald Frisch 960 Caren Road Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Frisch: Your application for a C lJ P� � �-��R will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, S�j,��_ �((� . 1`�id . The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. The Planning Commission recommended cZ �? ra��..� �� '�'� �tov��•c� Cav�.cSl.��ov�5 . h .1�ko� Co.,�n �'tl � Oc�.vP�l �-O.W . �� .Arau�&Q. Surv-�U Sl1ow�►�-q tev�CJ�� •p.w. auy P�,e.�'�-v Icv�e.S �1 Gtk �-u iv c�tn�otr-e �� rcz�� cvtiacC �.,re v��5 S a�- If you ha�e : . CON'F'lMV-�`rY w�✓1ie1r1QV1C.2 O� 'Qla.fs"E"lh ��L questions, please feel free to con�tact �e. Sincerely, � �C✓"I��.fC..�.-- Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant 1101 Victoria Curve -1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 4v2 -1850 • i.O:� �C'-�r'+�'+..{ ''t-."v'�5 G�r-1 - S1CT'gJEC'Z: �� t c.:c�.�-c,[�y�;. .�-l�--G�¢... � : �.,i^.� . ' . _..:. � '1 FROM: � 2.•r L� ��cc. (••R., l�2.s�.�- DATE: .. �u w�. �"z-�� . l �i 2 a �Q. c' b l� v"' CX l.5 C ls S S L E'i 1n, �-� �-� '� `a.1n t'+1 \�-� �js rv� v,ri l S�j�'oL� c� n �� - 24 ��c 2 0 -�''1,.-� �" � �--�.a 5 �(�-t l i �,n `-!- re c�r.....�.t�-c. b �l t� u�r-� �-�'e_a,_ -� c-- -�'�.�..- C:c�....� ��f~� ov.�.� l� s.c, $2 r rr► t-�- 1 c-L7 c e.�..>�c-c."S W � �,�.,�- �e..c e � �-e..� cy.. � t o �e...� �Za w. c..,+_ �.rz. �' � 4 "{" . 1 �,`.-� � a r � 4 '�-�, o vto,.. � l� ��'-v- w. +. �' 'r�-�. �.S � ` .,�r"-�'°a cv. o�r-cS�x-�"' �-o o r-�+ �'u � lo �•��n c� � • w o v �.c� a�So S v.a� c�.'� '�' �'"�.�..�.'�" "�"�¢. S c�rv�;.�/ Q.4r�a/ � ��<..i 4�-44 � j"" � G Ny -\ � oYY1 1�.. F-�O "t'�1 ��J trr �./ � ,o r�s y t � .o r c.o•r �`a -K..� Ca�v v. c�. � v+� �._ ❑ PLEASE REPLY BY ❑ NO REPLY NECESSARY � ❑ {C?VER} ' t, " CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 19, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jim Danielson, Public Works Dire -i Kevin Batchelder, Administrative ista�l� l SUBJECT: Case No. 90-18: Frisch, Gerald - CUP DI5CUSSION In 1980, Mr. Gerry Frisch, 960 Caren Road, received a CUP to construct a pool and pool house in his rear yard, see attached resolution approving the permit. As part of the initial CUP approval, the Council agreed to allow Mr. Frisch to install landscaping around the pool in lieu of fencing. Mr. Frisch now has a problem with his dogs leaving his yard and desires to install a fence, he has already placed the posts. Because Mr. Frisch's yard is a corner lot with the fence abutting a street he needs a CUP for the fence construction. Staff, upon conducting a site visit, noticed that the existing shrubs and fence posts appeared very close to the right-of-way. We therefore asked the City surveyors to measure the setback. They reported that the shrubs are within four feet (4') of the roadway and the posts are within ten feet (10') of the roadway, both are within County right-of-way. The drawing Mr. Frisch has submitted shows his proposed fence to be on his property line. Staff feels that the fence should be constructed on the property line as shown on the plan submitted. Having the shrubs on the County right-of- way is already causing difficulties in snowplowing, and should they be allowed to remain, together with a new fence will cause the City and County future difficulties in trying to upgrade the road. The City cannot approve having a fence on County right-of-way. ACTION REQUIRED Conduct the public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council on the requested CUP. JED/KLB:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 80-19 � ' RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT !i ' WHEREAS, on February 27, 1980, the Planning Comm.ission considered an � application from Gerald Frisch for a conditional use permit to construct ' a pool house structure at 960 Caren Road; and ;• � WHEREAS, said application also entailed consideration of a proposed !' rear yard variance and alternative screening in lieu of fencing around the _• pool area; and � . , �._ WHEREAS, after consideration of the application, the Planning Commission �� ,�� unanimously recommended City Council approval of the request as submitted; and � , �'' WHEREAS, on March 4, 1980, the City Council conducted a public hearing on the applicati.on and considered additional written recommendations from staff ' members relative to drainage, structure size, screening and setbacks; i�� NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mendota I,..' Heights that the Gerald Frisch application for a conditional use permit and �'�T:�' variance be approved subject to the following conditions: 1�': � �'�(.l. • . �� ' =��i �:� a. That the ool house structure shall not be used or occu ied 4t1. ; , P P �:-. -.,� �+,�;�::•• as a dwelling for human habitation. ��:.. � b. That the mean height of the structure shall be no greater than 15 feet. • c. That screening by means of berming and planting in accordance with the plan dated February 13, 1980, in lieu of•fencing around the pool area be given conditional approval. The • Council reserves the right to require installation of fencing in accordance with Ordinance #503 should the Council at some future time determine that fencing is necessary. � . d. That the drainage plan shall have explicit approval from the Public Works Director. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 4th day of March, 1980. -• . . • CITY COUNCIL ; . . • ._ ' � - • . - _ . ' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS . , j:�� 1. � . _ . . . . . . . By ��.7 ;�°��--��' -. ; � _. " •' . Robert G . Lockwood �• . y;j ATTEST: Mayor � '�''�%ti 3.', . . . � . • _ � . . . A �ieG/ ' i ��s een M. Swanson Clerk [, '"`i PLANNING REPCiRT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REGIUESTED. PLANNING CONSIDERATIClNS: , � � • r,. •� ; Gerald E. Frisch 960 Caren Road Approval of C.U.P. Co build a S-foot fence i n a resideniial front yard 1. The applicant's property is lacated at Caren Road and Victaria Road. The Iot, which is quite large and of an unusual shape, resuited from the assembly and reconfiguration of several smaller lots at the northern tip af the Highland Heights Subdivision. The applicant assembled ihis property sa he coulc�" build a swimming pool and poal house adjacent to his harr�e, which is located on ths norihern poriion of the groperty. In a previous request Mr. Frisch was granted a variance to substitute an Amur Maple Nedge for the 5-foot fence required to enclose a swimming poo1. The poal was built, and the hedge was installed some time ago. and has been we:= maintained. The hedge is dense and approximately 6 to 8 feet high. The 5-foot chain Iink fertce is prapased io be constructed inside the existing maple hedge, contrary to the location shown on the enclosed site pian provided 6y the apglicant, which depicts the fence outside the hedge. 2. After visiting the subject praperty it appeared the existing hedge was planted somewhat close to the paved roadway. Further investigatian by ihe City Staff revealed that in fact the hedge is Iocated eniirely within the ROW for Victoria Road, which is owned and maintained by Dakota Caunty. The ROW far Victoria Road in this area is 6b feet in widih and the Graveled roadway, the centerline for which is located 4 feet east of the cenierline af ihe ROW, is 24 feet wide. The location a# the maple hedge was measured to be 18 feet west of the centerline af the traveled roadway, or 14 teet west af the cer�terline af the ROW. Since we know the ROW measures 33 feet either side of khe centerline, we find that the hedge is located 19 feet into County Property. Therefare, the #ence, in its c�rrently proposed lacaiion, wouid also be located on County Property. 3. The City has na legal right to grant a permit to allow co�struction on property that is not owned or controlled by the appiicartt withaut the owner's prior written consent. Since Dakota County has given no formal notice of such consent the City would be unable to grant the applicant's request. According to Jim Danielson, Public Works Directar for the Gity, the ROW for Victoria Road is planned to be turned over to the City when the scheduled improvements to Highway 13 are compieted. At that time, the Gity would be in a position to allow the applicant to canstruct the praposed fence shauld they choose ta do so. Gerald Frisch, Case No. 90-18 " Page 2 ' 4. The applicant could also be issued a Conditional Use Permit to construct a fence inside his property line, which is estimated by the Staff to be approximately 19 feet west of the fro�t edge of the existing maple hedge. If the applicant selects to pursue this alternative, we recommend the following conditions: a. That the existing hedge be maintained at its current status so that the proposed fence is not visible from the adjacent public street. b. That the proposed fence be removed or relocated in the event that future improvements to Victoria Road result in the need to widen the roadway such that the fence cannot be screened from the public: street in its then current location. � ��. " . �1 � _ '� ; _ .. - � ` ..�}�. �� ' . . (( � � r 1 •_.:'.i-� � e ,� },, ` �• "_°°,__,.�: '` . . ` ' 1% K� �'- 1•--� ;` •r` .:. ` ' �.—,:%; rruir �,a�; Ip . / M� y ' � .,�`,�.�:_�`r. u�n «liul i ..'."1�ic.�' r��`.,, ��1�� '� ` �/� � : :. . �. � � � � ,/�/ 11 � r' ;:' , �' j/ � f � :.:•• `�% � �1 ��. . . �,, G�,�y aa�e. :;.;: : � ; ` , _. � '��i --,-,-_._._" . = �.: � �,` (� i� i .- _ --= _ = L��l..:;• ,<<,::;� •�- ��:� � , ' ��,, � .�s= .... . '.�' �� , ,.�:�_ • \ � \ II , � � = _ .,/` . � . �". � , � ` � : ��— � � ; �,. = . . `��r � �~: �. � "� --� �C s ` � . :��t . �ii' •CA +"i::: i • T , ` N . '• ' � � *f�� ..r•. .` � . f„ �s �G i l ` � � � ... : . . ! �.�.'' � . . ,. � � ,�T . ' ,.' ._,_ • � � `. � `�,f"! /..n: :�� m • `. �_. ... � �� . �I �;;;;. � +. \ � �� . , ,�;� . "`° � •,� ... . � � , �''''��"" t `� �� . '� � `• . � � � • y' • • • • • r . ♦ Y. • ` y i � • �� + y tiy°�•� a '� • � - ` . �, �ECT . . . . .� . .-,�,�.� PR �'�'_^•� . i •♦ S� 6 i• f!L + • ` ..},: ' �r %i '. " :` :.:::.:.. • - �. �.��. �� 1. . �• : � No�T .. . . . . � . , s y. � ,�: �'c�.�.: ;.::::::=:�: , -`��(, _. / �. , ,�a�E y„ 8 .�._ . .. _ : ' S • • • , • ' � . ` 7 �.,,, • • i • f ,� •'+' f. ' N .�'.. oo! �••~ .;` . . ... � �, C • • :. ..•.•... :•r:': :`• . •:: G �• � �� l- •,� . �` � �' ' ,�'� ^ � •'� KIMOSILV C4R.M. . ' � ! . . ( . � . ;r� • o Q , ; '` / `' � a` �i€;�'c !0 � � . j . ; ," .,,_,--� • • % '•• • ` �� ./� <i � I, � D � t'L� Lv ' ,.�z� � .� �.i./, �'� '! • •• � L'0s C � � �'�,; Jti `�_ :o �j--�-,, : . i • - . ; . «��E . -; : - 1 �� _ � � • • • • ' " - '+ , . H: � . . �' � . A Nl,�. ,� t 1! • . , • • • r' P,��` : . � � ',f t m� � . . � � . � � � - . �� . � • ��''.% � r . • � + g �--• • +..""MARfE....�...�AY • b '� i�, • `',---�" �.--�1 ;_.;_,� h ` i " + { � • • _ � � � ��' �i� ��f[ GM ' � j �; i ~ 1 � � l • • �`� ,;,z,y..", /i � 's � ��` � � �S� �' �ChYrfq�.:;s._ �yLii t � � � S • ♦ • • ... CeRCt( �� • � � � 6 _ � • • O • � ! � !� � � • Q - • i ]U V - �.u"' .. �'�-.... �M4 • • � • ♦........ �2V . 7. • � • N i--� � �"�`►�„� • • ♦ � 2U yJ � � � • . • • v � � � � � au � / '7 � ♦ � • � • � � �� t y �,,. �^4 Q • _ � � � J'i • � � � ♦ � : EU . I � • --- • � � • � • • • • � p � _- z_ � � � 2Tu �l� ' r _ � �. • 1 G. � YE � • • � Y � � 2 � • � • � r MOOf4 (l[YE p -'�.,, � �� . O J '� •� � • • • u"°� r►w.icM4 r W• • ��'j: ' __- 2 rw f ' 1 _� •t.. � � � � � , � � . � .,, y - _� m � : , . � � . � w <u . • j szu i. � . -..�. \ � � . `' . • � • Q • • �/(' � • .r/ t °U � i ( �/'\ • • • � I ,4 � .f� 1 ! � • ,�y ,. _ I af�� V'� P� O • J • + ° � j �^ � � �� t ,. • i . . � � � � .l � e i ••,• • — "'� c�wc, + !� ` i i� i . � � � .. � . / / . �ORtA . . a• � ` • • . o �t �. �'� � ; � covp: r „i ' • • � • .�• • '� =�'1'�S'' • v • • 7 • ! 4 , _ � �y.� ! 1 � � • '_ I � � ' � �_"",� � ..i � .� "'�"..--.. _ • \�`��1 • � < << � , I 1 , 1 ,; ., -�...__�'--� � ��—' • 1. � � _` • ;' ..«s o ( i7�..�', l } • e � ; . � r i \ �,,�\ ` ' � • . Q I ' \ � O � � , ' ,� Zq S . - 1 � � � - ,� 6 ., \ fi _�_ \ � �ti \ � �� ry� c � � \ � � ��pQ a : • �r �� ( . � �. se ; � � � i �3 ��R,� ��' � i : � -�.� � � , �- \ \ z �� ,,��• �,�*,��` i �,� , � � � i 3}�t v � \ �'1 m � c� , ` , . c � 7 � � cn '_ J p J� �:,, � 1Do �)rj .� � � J � �t � • , r l� � -,•{� �k° h � �v o 020_�� 5 � � �•� •- � �i c RRrKUR & � R1�"' +�.tSS��`� � � . a. - �� 5 � � 200�9 - �� o \ � � tio� � a 37 n � 3G � � L�:.�tir5 3 3 , 3'.'� h� n .r-, - E �a3oo izs ao �z3 co �sz :j ��a oc V �V 3¢ ` � � :.l�r.Gti r(L' �L�• _ }� - • N 6i�5349�E 65fl�lQ•- I -- � „� N � � i �o w{w �i+ �fl � oa /on � � i-' - T-`- c 1 '°i� 2 3 ��n 4 hf s @'v o. H � N i1 ' ' � • ( �ji � t . O � CP t,S � .s•2 "� v # ,alcC z :2sOG az5.a0 izi.S7 9�.sz' o� � � A I� E Q p ��c � � h By'.��49 �E_ . 4'S8 s, 'g�� ... _� � � .- ' " _"' ' ' " �J��s "�J�a �,�' � � 't � . '�'� D3V9 `�Od•, y� � � O �(,',. �- � ,a S6 = iCd ^(: . tOJOt� � 98.44 �V,�� '=p � N,6�66 `n' '$ �N�"'�. C � � . ,y,�se l.yo ^ � ! y ,�. �, �: �, . _ .��'o.o .„ -��,�� t3 ss" ?a op s i. s: . � � , � - � 2 '.; 13 � o i 4 �� ,��9yepjQ � $ = y �°'�`� yS � y 7 3 Z� 3p Y":`�;;;.;�;�{_;:. ��- ..:. .::.:. z s .� � �'. �� Y Q:�s �� :'>r":.:::"':�:::::; � N 89"S.i 49�'E � i.��,� , J ... .. .' �24.36 id6 OC 8'� ^y, O u� � S►UBJECT PRUPERT :;: �`::>::::::: ,<i.�n 8S �� a;s. � ` ,. � a ' S ib �F •••.i:�' .w �� 6 ' O� d O � 7 � ''S; :-.�.�'��',:::�.':';Sfi ' '�,�°' J i' 6� � �0� : fi M ....}::::::::::. n . ,r cc�bd2�i'oo° �r• ..yo�� o 0 Z i'X'#� t! �/^� , O N a a cp es `�� a /' 1, s g �°, N4RTH ° 1' r, �la�p �ry , :`�� l � � � A 6�',{�+' � `�,� N� Y,, [1 N'O00 29�Y. ',3"� i+ �, ?�S � �?\sAL� Iu=2�0« � � 2 ix:::�:�:;;:.=: ' 3a4�ir� °a4r»e�'8yo'� �C��,.� �3"s.9s_" � -eodvo'`�od� m�ti co .�� . ...... � a. �.s R� W � �P 9 a J � 1 2 � 4� :i�:c;:4;... � 7.03 t�y ,2 � � l\ o y` 31i.j �° tlq O� O �, + Ig ,N �; ., �j '� � .. fi•p�yl 4+�';1� 1$ ,-} �69.9� N..ity� 20 ya'�O C 7 p� �:; ::: � .i ' � v • a si'y.� 88at8'fr�' � s. i� :� ¢ � =i:�::. :�: �o �� ...+ a�t�r b�° dG°•�.° :a �: �S,";L� �' `� ' I � � :'::• .,.;1 4 �„ s t: � : 1G . p ,y7 R � 9, �\ O . �l ^ { 8 Z �� l 4 J � c i ':�.. � a g p\� f:' 1 4 ` 0 1 J t? , aC �?f �7 ` .� a a �s�F o s�Z �{{+tz ze � �so: � � � � o. 1 I j ' t� ��( Q,. • 1 'n �'�,�A I�O �''� ,� � a. .�� ,� �.9��\ .J 'K �9F53a5'E �:� `: NZ��B �� j`� . � \ `� �\ p. w ♦ a5S Ofi ,�y,: •, �' c�s.� $6�• �2 2 j CC lS . 2 G j o � o � �`' + m'w� .6:zeP33o3' ' r.,t:�a�� vi ole^ ��' p� � j ti f �O t,, � 2 .•� �'g. 7 ' }{y �c 2bp.�� .� �, ,q� 2 �i,ig /'"� - a )O� y'o . .2�ss�+ ; r 23��y�`oa .� ,�f,� � o " • s �� s�.s� .�''♦`�' 02 . 0 0 .: S Q 3 . '_�.W � E \ 1' � �'i(iT(':h. �� y `s �1 S • g � o �sn .;r `—�.�v �gp+g• ,�f'`��'ti ' "ro5��4?' ��' r+�1°+ '.° Z Z o q � n� '" i3��y • WP ��r a�,W, �' . � b+.` � o � G. b° .ii o 3 � o n a a/ �/�6 �'� ��, ,c: p.y�a c� 2T �_ S � \i��i �?' z N :� � o, � • �, a \ �„''� �rk1' $ �i `�, i � v iA � f O O 15 52 0� � .��0 24 � ��rs �.�,� m�.� '`, f� 9 ('� s,.s \ a . s� N � � `ty - 4 `"' �. q -+! 'Me'�r,r � 2 6 m"' -3,; , h �` g O � .� O ry?•'. 4 / w -3 N.8�5.".'a4� q 'S <�' ,to � rv O. �o ,�%y�' a. % +� 7 V'� S ♦ t42 AO Q "' �j.` `6 2"S V u! syi� �O �• � 2 3 f z a z o�- 3. • ., xsA . �a 5;� y; �' � • M ��rv, . , " � z0000 �o�" � !t / /O n� Q o C 'SeC'2 a E}:05? 7~ ^� f �,� 'f1- c�od o 37 Q 3 ��' -t o a � J :,- q o W- O g 4 : o Z Z `ir, �� ry Z tZ OZ a8,y �Vti3O �• 0 9p�O�nS.e �� `0 `�'.��`yry�,+� d N �v /\ h i4.&� "f�:b• O i i,B.T o p�� , BQlsou� ' J y� � V �OZ e Jv � -3'� .� 349�E�� i%�g.1"a y, _p "' P N`.. �' HB9•42 I�E t Z 1 '� ( z � z. % I .23 0� J� g +� t � so � Ooa 53t3iN S � ," z �, 4�s -: Ua'a�z a�>9 O o ��cyc _(` �ao x� $ ` /j � � 2 0 4� O 3 S a $,,�: y�`� a��r '" o Q s' `., "' / � / `3 �� Nr t'`'••. o _ �:e �. c� 1 � 3 i J� a9 z 3 r -� � � r 2 ' c' x �;� o 0 2� � Ltl .a� LL 4,p IYS � ` o �^ n '� . �f �, n o �;- - c. /�.•�� . 15 n Z"� ti �� h _ � �"Oth ,.��'•': . . .. � ' ' - �-•w : ' ` :� . . LAW OFFICES NILVA AND FRISCH, P. A. PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION ESTABLISHED 1935 ALLEN I. NII.VA 1911-1987 GERALD E. FRISCH THOMAS J. LAUGHI.IN RICK R LARSON May 10, 1990 2350 West Seventh Street • Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116 (612) 690-1591 FAX (612) 690-2613 City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 Attention: Kevin L. Batchelder Administrative Assistant RE: Application for Conditional Use Permit Chain Link Fence 960 Caren Road Dear Mr. Batchelder: Pursuant to your instructions of April 30, 1990, I herewith make application for a Conditional Use Permit for permission to install a five foot fence on my property generally parallel with Vicotria Road. The new fence will join the existing fence on the South side of my property and continue in a Northerly direction approximately 100 feet and then angle in a generally Northwesterly direction to join with the Southeast corner of my home. The fence will be located immediately inside of the existing Ginella Maple bushes. Enclosed herewith please find twenty (20) copies of the site plan showing the purposed chain link fence and the proposed cedar fence for privacy. Also enclosed herewith is Abstract showing property owners within 350 feet of my lot. � � Mr. Kevin L. Batchelder May 10, 1990 Page 2 Enclosed herewith is application fee of $10.00. Thank you for putting this matter on for Hearing as soon as possible. Very truly yours, IVII,VA AND FRISCH, P. A. �j � 2 � �� r � � %�'�`"�C'--_ Gerald E. Frisch GEF:ac Enclosure(s) AJT" + � i' .�..�.• Applicant Name: City o� - 1Viendota Heiglits APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. G�"� � Date of Application - �1� Fee Paid '�( SC'/'� �E��.9 �- PH: `7'�� `f / 230 (I..ast) (First) (Mn Address: cl C� � C� /L�,,,j �D �l'1 � oo r� h�TJ' �'I N S�fii �' (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) Owner Name: _ i' L i S e I� �-� 2� C..� �: . (Last) (First) (M� Address: �b�o ��r� 2� � � o m� od�-� i�Ts m� �s� r g (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) StreetLocation of Property in Question: Ct �j 0 l:� /L�N �(J ri'1F_r�pa rG-� 1�ITS M,�� Legal Description of Properry: 5� i� %� T T f� C yLi O Type of Request: Rezoning Variance �_ Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Wedands Permit Plan Approval Other (attach explanation) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number `� .0 � Section Present Zoning of Properry '`- �,. Present Use t't � C)'1 l�- Proposed Zoning of Property •. �( Proposed Use �? � n'! � I hereby declare that all statements made in this request ' the additional material are true. � 2 f ignature o Appli t) 5 �Y qo (Date) (Received by - Title) 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING June 21, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights will meet at 8:15 o'clock P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, on Tuesday, July 10, 1990, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Mr. Gerald E. Frisch for a minor conditional use permit to construct a five foot (5') chain link fence along Victoria Road on the following described property: The North 55 feet of Lot 41; Lot 3 except the North 33 feet thereof taken for Caren Road; That part of Lots 4 and 5 lying Easterly and Northeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 6, thence Northeasterly along the prolongation of the East line of Lot 6 to its intersection with the Northerly line of said Lot 5, thence in a Northwesterly direction to a point on the arc constituting part of the Westerly line of said Lot 4, which point is found by measuring Northeasterly from the most Southerly line of said arc on said Lot 4 a chord distance of 52.78 feet and there terminating; all in Block 1, Tilsen's Highland Heights, all as shown by the records of the County Recorder and County Treasurer of said County. More particularly, this property is located at 960 Caren Road. This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed conditional use permit will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING May 29, 1990 TO AHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Mendota Heights will meet at 7:45 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, June 26, 1990, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Mr. Gerald E. Frisch for a minor conditional use permit to construct a five foot (5') chain link fence along Victoria Road on the following described property: The North 55 feet of Lot 41; Lot 3 except the North 33 feet thereof taken for Caren Road; That part of Lots 4 and 5 lying Easterly and Northeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 6, thence Northeasterly along the prolongation of the East line of Lot 6 to its intersection with the Northerly line of said Lot 5, thence in a Northwesterly direction to a point on the arc constituting part of the Westerly line of said Lot 4, which point is found by measuring Northeasterly from the most Southerly line of said arc on said Lot 4 a chord distance of 52.78 feet and there'terminating; all in Block 1, Tilsen's Highland Heights, all as shown by the records of the County Recorder and County Treasurer of said County. More particularly, this property is located at 960 Caren Road. This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed conditional use permit will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk ��.C!'�-C� �/ 1 C� t�-� � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF IiEARING May 29, 1990 TO AHOM IT MAY CONCERN: � - �� — �10 �c� � PC� t�-'�- NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Mendota Heights will meet at 7:45 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, June 26, 1990, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Mr. Gerald E. Frisch for a minor conditional use permit to construct a five foot (5') chain link fence along Victoria Road on the following described property: The North 55 feet of Lot 41; Lot 3 except the North 33 feet thereof taken for Caren Road; That part of Lots 4 and 5 lying Easterly and Northeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 6, thence Northeasterly along"the prolongation of the East line of Lot 6 to its intersection with the Northerly line of said Lot 5, thence in a Northwesterly direction to a point on the arc constituting part of the Westerly line of said Lot 4, which point is found by measuring Northeasterly from the most Southerly line of said arc on said Lot 4 a chord distance of 52.78 feet and there terminating; all in Block 1, Tilsen's Highland Heights, all as shown by the records of the County Recorder and County Treasurer of said County. More particularly, this property is located at 960 Caren Road. This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed conditional use permit will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk � � - �� y� �o. �i�� -�� , % G'� - � �✓�� / /��:� �,�-�� , > r i G t�,�� =fi� V j �� . �e��r��J ,� �� . ` � �� :. � � � � y - � � 1t3T � �t3� J►� 11 � 1 L �� 1��5 June 29, 199p Mr. Gerald Frisch 960 Caren Raad Mendo�a Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Frisch: Your application for a��i �' �G �' �v�u2 will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly �cheduled meeting, c,rhich will be held on Tuesday, �a,�,��((� , t i�ld . The Council meeting starts at 7:30 a'clock P.M. here at City Ha21 in the Council Chambers. You, ar a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your applicata.on wi11 rec�ive Council cansidera�ion. The Planning Co�aission recommended c{a�rav�.t ��t '�"Lr�-e- -tt� � �oW 4�.�,. Co,n.c�.� �"�ov►5 G�v~�. Sl�-'� • �l ) (.�r-i *t�v'1 A� S'�v+�s5 to� �-�r s1�'� R• Cj, . W . �c" ctJ � a�. � wz�.st-S S �-�- If you ha�e KLB . klcb , O . �J . (Z- ) O �'a u �S�-Q. � !t � Co v�i- � hv�2 w�,. :��► �e.tin u.v, c.e o�' 2.r�r� -f-� r. � questions, please fee1. free to co�Gact Sincerely, �.A-N'"Lv-� 4.�'-��c,/�-�..�C....._ Kevin Batchelder Admi.nistrative Assistant _ ,,,,�1 t wt � cvv2�►^t. lf 01 Vietoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 � . . C lty O� � .�., .� 1Viendota..I-ieights June 22, 1990 Mr. Gerald Frisch 960 Caren Road Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Frisch: Your application for a �(� � �-r' �� will be considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, �v,•.� � The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission consideration.. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, • � � Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb a 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Vier�dota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 � � �� CHII,DRENS COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL 1588 South Victoria Road Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 June 30th 1990 Ka.thleen M. Swanson CITY OF MENDOTA HEIC-�iTS 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 RE: Gerald Frisch application for fence Dear Kathleen: I will be unable to attend the hearing on July 10th. I am in support of the fence installation at the Frisch residence. The fence will not only iricrease property protection for the Frisch's but more importantly, will assure the safety and well being of the large number of young children living nearby. I had always been under the impression that a fence was required on a site that occupied a swi.mming pool. Sincerely, � � 0 Ronald D. Ettinger Neighbor of the Frisch's CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 3, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant SIIBJECT: Case No. 90-20: Sjoholm - CUP DISCIISSION The Planning Commission at their June meeting conducted a public hearing and considered an application for a CUP for a fence from Mr. and Mrs. Jack Sjoholm of 1161 Delaware Avenue (see attached staff inemos). The plans submitted show two locations for the proposed fence. At the Planning Commission meeting the Sjoholm's stated that they were now seeking approval for the fence location furthest from Wentworth Avenue. This is indicated on their plan by a pencil line. The fence line meanders through existing trees and is forty- three feet (43') from the centerline at its closet location and forty eight feet (48') at its furthest location. The property line is thirty-three feet (33' ) from the centerline of Wentworth Avenue. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted 5-1 (Morson) to recommend approval of a CUP for a fence with two conditions. 1. That the fence be within the pine trees. 2. That the approval be for the penciled line on the site plan at a range of forty-three feet (43') to forty-eight feet (48') from the centerline of Wentworth Avenue. Morson is opposed to solid board-on-board fences. ACTION REOUIRED Conduct the public hearing. If the Council desires to implement the Planning Commission's recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 90 - ,"A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FENCE". JED/KLB:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FENCE WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Jack Sjoholm have made application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for construction of a fence at 1161 Delaware Avenue along their north property line adjacent to Wentworth Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 26, 1990 to consider the application for construction of said fence; and WHEREAS, based upon the public record transcribed on June 26, 1990 the Mendota Heights Planning Commission recommended to the Mendota Heights City Council that the Conditional Use Permit to allow for construction of said fence be approved conditioned upon: 1. That the fence be within the pine trees. 2. That the approval be for the penciled line on the site plan at a range of forty-three feet (43') to forty-eight feet (48') from the centerline of Wentworth Avenue. WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on July 10, 1990 to consider the Sjoholm's application to build a fence. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will have no adverse effect on the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the community surrounding land; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that construction of said fence would not be adverse to the general purpose and intent of the Zoning ordinance. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the fence will be within the pine trees and not less than forty-three feet (43') from the centerline of Wentworth Avenue. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this tenth day of July, 1990. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 20, 1990 Planning Commission James E. Danielson, Public Works Di � Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assi Case No. 90-20: Sjoholm: CUP for a Fence DISCUSSION Mr. Jack Sjoholm, 1161 Delaware Avenue, lives at the corner of Delaware and Wentworth Avenues. Mr. Sjoholm desires to construct a six foot (6') solid board fence along his property line abutting Wentworth Avenue to provide screening and abatement of traffic noise (see attached plans). In order to construct a fence in excess of thirty inches ( 3 0" ) along a property line abutting street right-of-way a conditional use permit is needed. Although the setback dimension is not labeled, the applicant has notified staff that the fence is located thirty three feet (33') from the centerline, which is consistent with the property line. Although the applicants prefer to have the fence constructed on the right-of-way line, they have also shown an alternate location at ten feet (10') to fifteen feet (15') further back. ACTION REQUIRED Conduct City Council conditions. JED/KLB:kkb the public hearing and make a recommendation to the on the request conditional use permit including any C � PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REOUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: � 26 June 1990 90-20 Jack F. S joholm Corner of Wentworth and Delaware Avenues Conditional Use Permit for Fence Over 30 Inches Tall Within Front Yard Setback 1. Attached is a copy of a letter from the applicants, Gretchen and Jack Sjoholm, requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a fence within the required front yard setback at their residence. The property is located in the southwest quadrant of Wentworth Avenue and Delaware Avenue. The fence would be constructed along a portion of the Wentworth Ave�ue frontage. 2. The zoning ordinance requires a Conditional Use Permit for any fence over 30 inches tall built within the 30-foot frarnt yard setback. The intent of the ordinance, as previously applied by the City, is to keep a more open feel to the front yard streetscape on city streets and not to have a solid "wall" of fences defining the street edge. The ordinance also requires fences to be 30 percent open. 3. Attached is a copy of a landscape plan prepared by Dundee Nursery showing both the proposed fence and landscaping. The fence location as originally proposed is on the underlying blueprint line and the current fence proposal is delineated in pencil on the print. The Sjoholm's original proposal located the fence on the right-of-way line, 33 feet from the centerline of Wentworth Avenue. The current proposal places the fence 10 to 15 feet behind that, or 43 to 48 feet from the centerline of Wentworth, as indicated in the Sjoholm's letter. The fence in this location requires a Conditional Use Permit since it is still within the 30-foot front yard setback. 4. In our meeting with the applicant he indicated that the fence would be about 6 feet tall and his letter states that it will be a solid board cedar fence. We have no other information on the design or appearance of the fence. S. The Sjoholm's note i� their letter that there is a"green wall" of foliage all along Wentworth Avenue. This is essentially correct, but most of that existing foliage is deciduous, not evergreen, and as such would have less of a screening effect in the wintertime. It is mostly volunteer growth, not purposefully placed and maintained. Also, much of it is in the right-of-way and subject to damage or removal if road or utility work is necessary. Jack Sjoholm, Case No. 90-20 Page 2 6. It appears from the landscape plan and also from our meeting with the applicant that the existing trees on the Wentworth Avenue frontage will be retained and that they will be outside the new fence, i.e., between the fence and Wentworth Avenue. The Sjoholm's letter indicates that there will be additional landscaping added to enhance the street side of the fence. The landscape plan indicates two cherry trees and an amur maple along the fence, but it is not clear if these are existing or proposed. If they are proposed, they appear to be within the Wentworth Avenue right-of-way, and could be subject to damage or removal if the City or County needed to do work in the right-of-way. 7. Based on the information we have, the Sjoholm's fence proposal appears to be reasonable and co�sistent with the predominant aesthetic of the neighborhood, if certain conditions are met: a) The fence should be placed as indicated on the plan at least 10 feet from the right-of-way, i.e., at least 43 feet from the centerline of Wentworth Avenue. b) The design of the fence, if not shown at the Planning Commission meeting, should be submitted to the Planner for approval. c) All existing major foliage should be identified, retained and protected from damage during construction. d) Any new landscaping, which is essential to screen the fence, should be place outside the right-of-way, i.e., at least 33 feet from the centerline of Wentworth Avenue. Other landscaping may be added inside the right-of-way, with the understanding that it might be damaged or removed at some point to allow for work within the right-of-way. e) New landscaping should be added to make the fence "all but invisible from the roadway". The plan submitted appears to do this, but we cannot tell exactly what is existing and what is proposed. . f) All landscaping on the Sjoholm's property outside the fence (between the fence and Wentworth Avenue), whether existing or proposed, should be maintained in good condition by the property owner -- the Sjoholms or their successors -- in order to screen the fence. Any landscaping which is diseased, damaged or removed, resulting in loss of substantial screening of the fence, would need to be replaced within a reasonable time period to maintain the conditions for approval of the fence. '� . • a�j��•'.' t./'�,� • �. . . . . . • . • a • • � t� . !.i t _ �Ttt^�_.1 �i ~� ��J�' , � _� ,_ ...__ -. �CME�2S8K fty[E}{CI£ }r _. . :_._._-.-. L..._ r ,y ,-- i � �� ,.....__�.___._ ��' �f-�.�, }� ' �.. �' � -��= .-J,'. :, .��---; {�,..�� ' _ �r ; '- . . � 'BROOKSIDf � LAN£ , !. • 7 ��'� .J/: ' ' ' ._.� �i NUtl• �� uT'_ • j t�• � ! � ' 1aJ1 � I _i �t'%/ � ( � b' • �� ` r • • ' , ..�..w.�,-�`- �~`---+-�.7t�I � ' � - # a . � �' �_'-`__y�Cr—�— �!t � :J�� 9 : i • q� . 7 -,l . • � � (��e-' ` 1 f ,� �/! , \ � F_ ' � "' ¢ R 0 i � � . t`�� • - : � �. . .. ,..__J � s.�=— - "• i' � j� . � • / - AV�H •` �-- - - t �1 , � a � � 1 �i a '' • ---- - ._--1� . ' . .'� f � , � � _.. � ��_. _ F�.�' w .{. �� ' _ -�- � , I (. . 50MERSE7 �� ' � S , ;� � , �...;.... • Y M � �' � • • Q I COUtvTRY CLUB � i�'-~�-- � . ' � .. � . . � `� � '�� ,-.,�-t � �` � _ _ ... . / � ` _ . , t' ^(--j �, .. �! , ' ( �_ Fa�N r�L � - , ^`�� .,.! t � . . o.ac cia • � � wEt j� • , • � �: � ', . ': • 'a' ' ! '...�.'.:,. � s -.• *ri GOLF COURSE ,nC.r� � �t'`.`:-__" ' � ._ .� --z � , _._�. r � �`--.: \ . . . � � . - - (Rivote) �` -- � 1 WEMPMfOfITH r �a __ � r Sf � PARK �..' � ( .�- � i i�' � I 9 • '`�.__.� � l'! i � , , • �� • • . . , . , . �. . CS-= 175 -.-7i�= _' � '-_. , . t ... .; . . i . : �::;'•�r::;}:•Z t";_"`*'_' . . � + _ __ • • ! • �. ». c..; � •�� • • . I . :.•�.f::4:?:i � . /�,+y � � .� ' '� �� ; � r... ^f � / _a v I � ' ' •!t . + ._� •I • yp Y 1� /t �,.•' - � : .. i , � �, t �Y •' • +{ �� • • � �^ ' � -- . -- -.—. 3/t �•' � ;! ' �+' . � -t. _ _ ;) , R " � ` � • � � _ : ; SUBJECT PRC?PERTY .� . : - . , /i •� I� � Kr�o �, � � ; , ` r . •- - . --+- i� . I f I . . � t � . � � C . . �.�.z. � .. . ;.. .�� . .. , ___ _ -��.,_�.. NORTH , . . . M�NOC�A H�'GNTS ; SCALE 1'+�{,/OO, � x PAR 3 GOIF � � �RSE +i �B'1 � ' ( pU84�C} • � i • �t N a�r' � r � : r ' ✓ � �� .1 �{1W" r -'. �.:�_�-`•' --^ - -^ —` -- y.. _. ._- - - - -- - ' . .� - 4S .�. t. . i. .�-,� .:• � Ft � -�� r„_ v//4 �j.,'"•. + � . . � / , _� ( . . .� • � t �-..."��------•-- i -'� - � t . �.. _ .. `t - { t+ ,«.� �'_ �� `y' _' ; � � ' • , ..y- : � . i ��-!�� -- ------ -_.____----- , - -�� . .v.� , . :; , , . ��,,r.� �' . : �''• . � i - ,, � _•�- � � t1:. �'-. _.... _ _.__ _ - --. .. , , . . y � }--� I •� , � , �� • r �_ L .r_- � . � , �..� , 1 r: � � ` � ° � , . J ! ',- �_____ r � �,. / _ / » �.,,;�� - �� "� - � �oa w � � N - � _ r�_ i �.. ..r__ _,.�.�_ %- . � - • � , � � •L �. . -_.� _ - � � � _� _ ' J�'�� .-.' _� _'_ � ' �,: : ., ' • � -T±-'i �. � ;� i _..f + . . =r� . � * • C..: .�.�..� . r . i � 1 ,�; • ;�► . t' � �. _ ,t NU � � .. i • • • •�,4. • •� � I • i• a� � �•'' '. ,{ � , ".�-` . � +-y ' _; '� _ : _j. =`, ,-'-,, ' � =-�--- r � j .. � l . . . ._ _ , . ; , � . ` � ' -� . . . • - , . ,- � �:� , ,�� ' i � `..�..�._ �----�_.. . � � _.� ..—. , ; i ■ Qt rnG4ti � " � • CT � • � � • � , `w.i / ' ( . � W � � COUFS . . ... • . � � � J�`: - -�---- � - . . . - " + � . • ' ; • • • � • '' 9 31k�._.,:_,� _.. O .a..._�. � s • • • s � Iw.w Yi63J',3 + _ • r�. •' � ( • , � . . i r _ � � . • � � •O� • + + � • t•= � tBNE wC.! � � j i� • . F"-"� "^ a . " ' "_ i 3 . ,�//� / � . � . � i � , . N •/ _ . • • � • � « ,; , ■ ��' . - ,` . I � - , • : • � , . • «cwar s�s�e. '� � � •- -• - �� I c TJ 1 �* C e4 yl��OM wIGM SCN(Xk � � � �� • • Pue1K� ( � . • .., � w ` � � . .. . . v��. t,• � � � - .u.�., ,. . ' 1� ,.r . .• � SI .'. �'- _ .J ~' �e�s�o.,. ' � : •.� � - • : o � ! �.. � � _ + � _ . . .� + • . . �L � _'-'- _ •-� � � Y� �. —.. _'_ � __,—�—_�`' � '� c--� .----y c�--� ''�,�,-c-• � a ♦ 4 �z'�. �� . N Q`; !• ;� � a• � f--..— � . �� , � , 1 I r- � , �� ,YRr,.. � . �aN� SUBJECT PROPERTY NORTH T SCALE 1 "=200' - 324 39 N e9�sa'za"w.. � WENTWORTH AVE. ` 170 �3 194.59 .... W � :: ::.;� I - - 2 �� ::::;:::::::;��:::::�3a�'::�:�<��`�:� :::::::::::::�:::>:;:::>: � � � G • :;:y ;?:• ::::::::::::::::::::. •;J�:.:::::: � _ G N :; ..::: i$^�� •}}iii:•i:ti•iii}::• �:� ::C•:• }iii: i '. N _ �"�:�::x�%y::;::::::.. ... ., o� :•.. 1�s ('C � 12s JC �:. � : 0 /S 6e � -; 3 Z ,; ,� ��j N � v C�� Y` o G.84 • �`� � � JO�G� I ; �� M G m . � �` � �^ � a m "' » � � m � � P� 7 �, �� 9 �2 � m Y� � r� � C� L � �96.2i = 417 3� � I '- ---633 52•-- N. 89°55 48 W-- - -s �WIF� 010-76 8 � I � ICa�-/ B f Fi-a�c�s O. d.�� /O Ac 0 2 0- 76 � �6oa8-A 'i � -- --- --- - -- — �� I : T/�o s G. i1ila i r--.3 � /O Ac o�o- •a i �c�o�g—R � ■ 1 - - _ _ T___- � _ ___ _ June 14, I990 City of Mendota 750 South Plaza Mendota Heights, 1611 Delaware Avenue Mendota Heights, Minnesata Heights Drive Minnesota 55118 Re: Letter of Intent, Special Use Fence Application Dear Sir/Madam; The purpose of this letter is to set for�h the circumstances which we believe reasonably support our applicati.on for a special use permit far the erection of a fence along the northern lot line af our property. This property is located on the southwest corner of the intersection af Delaware Avenue and Wentworth Avenue. The proposed fence would be six feet high, runni.ng for appraximately 175 feet along the south side of Wentworth Avenue beginning at a point approximately 175 feet from the corner. The proposed fence would be a solid board cedar fence. The naed for this fence is a result of the peculiar circumstances of Wentworth Avenue as it affects our property. Wentworth is not a�ypical Mendota Heights street. It is a county highway whose speed limit adjacent to our prop�rty is 40 miles per hour. The high speed limit, eoupled with a significant grade, resul.ts in considerable traffic noise. Cars going east up the hill are braki.ng or down-shifting to stop, while cars going west are accelera�ing down the hill. The "country" feel of the roadway seems ta give motorists license to travel as guickly as possible between Delaware ana Doda. With the current landscapinglfoliage alang Wentworth Avenue, there is essentiall.y a green wall an both sides, parti.cularly in the summer manths. This is a result of the non-residential use on the north side af the road between Dodd and Delaware, specifically the Somerset Country Club. On the south side of Wentworth, almost every home has a substantial set back, This green carridor effect is practically continuous along the entire length of Wentworth from Delaware to Dadd. � , In order to maintain the current appearance of the roadway, yet to provide some necessary relief for our home, we are amending our initial fence proposal as described above. Based upon current foliage on our property this new fence location would permit almost a 20 to 25 foot green barrier between the road shoulder and the fence. Currently, there are 10 white pine trees and at least 3 other substantial trees in that area, and we would propose to add additional landscaping which would make the fence all but in�isible to the roadway. This should result in an almost continuous green wall along both sides of Wentworth from Dodd to Delaware. At the planning council' hearing, we will present photographs which indicate how difficult it is to see an object 43 to 48 feet from the center line when there is an intervening green barrier. It is also necessary for the fence to be a closed design throughout its length as this is the most effective sound barrier. This fence would then provide some necessary relief from traffic noise along the north side of our property. To provide similar protection through the planting of evergreens would result in a series of 8 foot pine trees along the property at an installed cost of over $300.00 per tree. Such a costly alternative is. not an economically feasible solution. Since Wentworth Avenue is a county road there is apparently little that can be done at the local level to reduce the speeds and noise along the road. In order to provide relief from the problems generated by this roadway, special solutions are appropriate. The main purpose of this fence is not to provide privacy but to protect real estate from the intrusions of the roadway and its traffic. Because of the unique nature of Wentworth adjacent to our property we submit that the proposed fence is reasonable and worthy of special consideration. Ultimately the practical effect of permitting the fence will be minimal since it will be virtually invisible from the road and thus substantially similar to the rest of Wentworth between Delaware and Dodd. A We respectfully request that the Planning Commission and the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights grant our request for a special use permit to construct a fence. Sincerely, Gretchen and Jack Sjoholm . -- ity o€ .,,1 l, � _ 1Viendota Heiglits Applicant Name: APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. I O 7l�(� Date of Applic�on r 1- Fee Paid _r( � i� �' /� C� ��d � � . 3 ^ �Z 7 J f� 1� �a�.)� � PH: lD� 1�D (I.ast) (First) (NIn Address: � ) � %�� Gt c�i a Y � � V '�-. , %yl 2n c� o �� 1`t' !�S . /%7!v . S�%/ �; . (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) Owner Name: �� `� S a— � o�.r'� (I.ast) (F'ust) (Mn << ,, . � Address: (Ntimber & Street) (Ciry) (State) (Zip) Street Lacation of Property in Question: - Cc� �v r� r c�,� l� Q� `� C..�-� � '�' �L � O� C�1 d.�►/' � Legal Description of Property: �c�.�1 �, �� '� V ; �i� . T�pe of Request: - . zoning Condidonal Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Plan Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Variance Subdivision Approval Wetlands Permit Other (attach explanation) Applicable City Ordinance Number Section • Present Zoning of Property, �. Present Use << , � Proposed Zoning of Property :�, Proposed Use t( I hereby declare that all statements made in this material are true. 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 18�0 � m CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING June 21, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights will meet at 8:00 o'clock P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, on Tuesday, July 10, 1990, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Mr. Jack F. Sjoholm for a conditional use permit to construct a fence greater than thirty inches (30") within the required yard setback along the property line on the corner of Wentworth Avenue and Delaware Avenue on the following described property: 5ection 24, Township 28, Range 23, NW 1/4 of NE 1/4 of SE 1/4. More particularly, this property is located at 1611 Delaware Avenue. This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed conditional use permit will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk x 4 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARSNG June ?, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Cammission o� the City of Mendota Heights will meet at 8:15 a'clack P.M. on Tuesday, June 26, 1990, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesata, ta consider an application fram Mr. sack F. Sjoholm for a conditional use permit to construct a fence greater than thirty inches (30") within the required yard setback along the property line on the corner of Wentworth Avenue and Delaware Avenue an the following described property: Seat More I Avenue. This No. 401. proposed s 24, Township 28, Range 23, NW 1/4 of NE 1/4 o�'SE 1J4. particularly, this property is located at 1611 Delaware notice is pursuant ta City oi Mendo�a Heights Ordinance Such persons as desire ta be heard with reference to the ;anditional use permit will be heard at this meeting. Kathle�n M. Swanson City Clerk � C�ity o� �� + -�� - .�,. �• 1Viendota�Heigl�ts June 22, 1990 Mr. Jack Sjoholm 1611 Delaware Avenue Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Sjoholm: Your application for a C-V � �� will be considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, ��-�. 2�� . The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attendi�ng the meeting, in order that your application will receive �ommission consideration.• If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ' � ��.�"(,�SL�.r- Revin Batchelder � Administrative Assistant e 0 1101 Victoria Curve -1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 •�'°� I �- ity o� � 1Viendota �-ieig�lits June 29, 1990 Mr. and M�s. Jack Sjoholm 1611 Dela�aare Avenue Mendota H�lghts, MN 55118 Dear Mr. �nd Mrs. Sjoholm: Your application for a C U(� -4a r �v� cs�, will be considerei by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, hich will be held on Tuesday, J u 1 v lG , (�j Q� o The Council m eting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Counc 1 Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attendinglthe meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. 0 The Planning Commission recommended Q,� � �o.ra-1 a� �e �.C�C ,�p;�' 0. K�n�R Cbvt��'Fco�B Ov� i� �g]�c�..'4'l0✓1 - a-% �-f �� r-r�v�n r P v� %e. r� � tr�a (�{4f � � N.�. ce. �. i� r-' � t �-e. W �-t. � � l '� i If KLB:kkb 1101 have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, �.�--- lJ Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 � �.E.,. .5�,,.�,,, � . �� -- �7/0�� w�-, -��1 y i �_�, i �� Mendc�ta Heiqhts _ity i=:��un�_il ilc:�1 Vi�_t�_�ria i=��rve Mend��ta Heiqhts, Mn. JJ11S Dear i=:ity �_� �un�_ i�l Member�s, This 1et;ter� is a�_��ver letter f�,�r the atta�=hed "F'eti.ti��n f��r Uar ian�_e fr�� rr� M�r�dr_�ta Heiqhts i=i�y Ordinan�_e #i�ii�1. " The three �inqle resi�ien��e f�milies ��f Nel��_�n, F::Pich�aw, and S.jc�h�rq are res e��t ful ly r�ques�t inq a var ian�Te fr� �m ��_�tt ing neiqnt ��n � ��r ad.ja�_ ent hil lside pr�,�pert ies. Th� request f� �r var ian�_e stems fr��m �,me ��mp1a nt �.an��('lyffl��lt5? in whi�_h the basis <<f the ��r�plair�t i� unk:n�_�wn t�� th� � r�_�perty �_�wnersq ��ther than the appearan�: e!�f n� �n�_� �mp1 iari�e with the e:ist i � q �_�rdinan�_e. Our request f��r vari�n�_e is supp��rted with the f��II�_�winq: #1. Our atta�_hed p�titi��n si►pp��rted by 1�'� immediat� neiyhb�_�rs 51q1�c'�'�UYLS r�presenting '�,."'., 511'�Cq12 YP_S].{jEll�_G l��t �=�Wf'12Y5 cil'id ��_�=l.lpcif't't5 �,�f Del �ware i=r� �ssing, G�,�pper f ield, and Hampshire Estates wha value g�een spa�_es left in their natural habitat and envir��nment. Many petitic�n siqn�rs stated that these type� �_�f natural spa�_es were part � �f •the beauty �_�f �1end� �ta Heiqhtse #2. Our atta�_hed letter /rep��rt � �f � �bservat ic�ns � �f a 1 � ��_al ` n�turalist. #3. F'r�_�per�y ��wners have made a g�_��d fai.th efi•Fart t��wards neiqhbc�rh� �� d s�fet_y by m� �winq the f irst f i fteen feet ba�_Fc fr� �m Huber Avenue �=urb f��r szfety c�f smaller �_hildren �nd sc� the i�ity �_�f Mend�_�ta Heiqhts has q�ii�_F: and ef f i�_ ient a�=�=ess t� � the f ire hydrant 1��_ated within that f i fteen fc��t str ip. :w . #4a i=:��ntigu�_��.ts t�� and s�.�rr�_��.inding the hill�ide f��r whi�:h varian�_e is reque�ted, and wa.thin a dist�n�_e c�f appr�� :imately f ive hundred yard�, the q��graphy ��f are� �_��ntains at le�st t�n a�Mres c�f �imil.ar tall qr��se� ancl native habitat. T(�is in�_lude� the Fr'i�rit�ly Ni1J.� dr��in7qe dit��h tall qrasses rt�tnnanq fr�_�m Huber Av�nue 3��:: t�M� and at��:��lnd Fri�ndly Hil1s p�_inci; the t�ll gr�a�ses by N�tiaer� w�1F::ing path �nc1 �t��W��nd b�_�th Hutaer� {at�ln�st �he 1,�11 c1�'�� .,j�.tst n�_�r•th r_�f �=l�ey�nne Lane and H��ber; the t�ll gra�ses ..i�_�st a�_��.�th �,�f Ap�-t��h�a L��n� and Huber; and th� t��.l c�ras��s �r��.�nd Water��dc�e T�rra�� :�nd. E��znq th�.�t lifeg health, and saf�ty �w�f i�f�nd�,��:� Heiqhts resi.dent� is n=�t �t iss�,t�, we ask: th�t �he i�:ity ��:��.tn�_il a�_t �_��nstr4��_tively �nd in ��_�_��rdan�_e with the desire� ��f a v�tst ma.��;:�r ity ��f •the neiqhb��rh��w�d •��und the hillside at is�ue �nd gr�nt a vara.an�_e fr�:�m C:ity Ordi.nan�:e # 1 c�� i_� 1 . ,�� . � ° ' �1�'"' 1 �C /-"�� To: BOARD OF DIRECTORS MRS. OLIVIA IRVINE DODGE PRESIDENT PHYLLIS ABRAHAMSEN . AMYANDERSEN ALMA DERAUF THOMASDODGE ELIZABETH S DRISCOLL CLOVER EARL OLIVIA C. FORD STANLEY H. GUSTAFSON WILIIAM HUEG SALLY KLING IANTHA LEVANDER • DANIEL PENNIE GEORGE C. POWER. JR. GINNIE RECORD ROBERT RIDDER V;CENTA D. SCARLETT GORDON SHEPARD ELLEN STURGIS STEVEN TOUREK WILLIAM WEST JAMES M MALKOWSKI EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Z�io�as �7rv«e �o�ge �aiure G'e�rter 1795 CHARLTON STREET WEST SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55118 16121 455•4531 July 9, 1990 Mayor Charles Mertensotto and Council Members Ms. Janet Blesener, Mr. Cazl Cummins II, Mr. Bart Anderson and Mr. John Hartman Joan Nelson has asked me to write a letter to you supporting the variance for which she and her ::Pigh�ors are r�q��srng. I:m v�r; p:�ased to d� so: •� As a former resident of Mendota. HeiDhts and member of the Parks and Recreation Commission, I have valued the abundance of natural habitat remaining in the Ciry. I lrnow great efforts have been made to retain as much of the natural landscape as possible but development pressures continue to compromise the amount and integrity of the land. In the particular situation for which the variance is being requested, I understand that one of �he neighbors has objected to the presence of natural vegetation on the berm between a portion of Apache Court and Huber Drive. I walked the bemi on July 3rd and I was pleasantly surprised by what I found. Despite the fact that area has been disturbed several times by farming,the pipeline and the herm, there actually are some native prairie plants (lead plant, wild rose and prairie bush clover). The predominant grass is Brome which was imported from Europe. It is typically 12-20 inches high and is known to cause fewer allergies tha�n many of the grasses used for lawns. There are several species of goldenrod plants but contrary to popular belief, they aze not a major source of hay fever. I did not find much evidence of ragweed and/or amaranth which are the primary cause of late summer hay fever. In addition to a wide variety of forbs, there were wild plums, honeysuckles, wild grape, aspens, elms and box elder trees. This very nice variery of vegetarion serves to stabilize the soil preventing erosion on rhe steeper slopes ana provides habitat for wildlife. in the snort time 1 was there I observed goldfinches, robins, catbirds, song sparrows and even a bluebird. In this day of heightened environmental awareness and concern, a variance of the weed control ordinance would be a step in the right direction. The area does not require fertilizers or water to maintain nor is it necessary to expend energy to cut the area. Interestingly, White Bear Township has drafted a new rule pernutting native prairie azeas as part of a landscape treatment. �It is very evident that the Nelsons and their neighbors have incorporated the natural vegetation into their backyard landscape design. Moorhead, Minnesota. and Madison, Wisconsin also have developed pernuts for "natural lawns". ,+ e • �"Y Page 2 In conclusion, I believe the value of retaining the current vegetation far outweighs the reasons for requiring the current ordinance to be enforced. Accordingly, I would encourage the Mendota Heights Ciry Council to grant a - variance to the "weed" ordinance. Thank you for your time and consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 455-4531. Senior Naturalist AMS: kj cc: Joan Nelson .� r- 0 July 10, 1990 Mendota Heights City Council � Subject: Property at 2366 Apache Court, owned by Joseph & Joan Nelson. In the spring of 1987 Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Nelson contacted Bachman's, Inc. for a landscape design to be d.eveloped and implemented for their residence at 2366 Apache Court,in Mendota Heights. In the process of planning and creating this design it was decided that the back portion of their lot should be left in its natural state, (A pipeline runs thru this area and has an easement that runs thru this part of their lot). I, as the designer contacted the city offices and inquired about what restrictions may apply to this area. It was agreed at that time that this area would be best left in its natural state (which we did). It is still my opinion that this is the best solution for this area and that it also is in concurrence with all the neighbors back yards with the exception of one. Therefore I strongly urge that this landscape be left in its natural state. Any disturbance of this area would adversely affect its•natural environment and create a breeding ground for noxious weeds. spectfu ly submitted, � �_` Jeffrey T. Hauer Bachman's Landscape Design Dept. 9ACH��1aN'c ;in;C= _° s . _ �ve.y� �� - . _ ,. -- `+� . = - � _ . - � -- :- c e Ju.Zy 10,1990 TO: Ma�or and City Council CLAIMS LIST SUMMARY: Total Claims Significant Claims MWCC Winthrop Weinstein Unusual Claims Blattner & Sons Kodet League Mn Cities Northern Air HRS Const Ro So Const Sewer Lega1 (Kensington 5,803.96 Ruby Drive Park Archictect Dues City Hall repairs Ivy FaI1 Creek North Ivy Fa11s 100,103.63 30,496.66 8,758.70 21,849.25 2,54I.05 3,946.00 771.79 12,063.23 7,594.58 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 6, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Wetlands Permit for Sibley Park DISCUSSION• There is a very small area of wetlands located in the northeast corner in the Sibley Park Development (see attached map). Mr. Mike Krajniak who lives across from the park and who needed to have a wetlands permit to construct his home has called to complain that no public hearing was held to consider filling this wetland, as was needed by him for his home construction across the street. The Sibley Park wetlands is very small and staff suggests that Council process a wetlands permit under Section 8.0 for minor develop- ment. This is the same ordinance section the City ii�c processes the majority of the single family home permits under. Mr. Krajniak has informed staff that he plans to attend this council meeting to discuss the wetlands permit with Council. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that Council declare The Sibley Park wetlands permit a minor development, waive Planning Commission review and the requirement for a public hearing and grant the City a permit to fill the wetlands according to the Sibley Park plan (wetlands portion attached). ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should waive Planning Commission review, the requirement for a public hearing and grant the permit. JED:dfw �, i 6 Jcr] 1'a'.3i1r F'ri s:?:�8 PM i� � TPA7t7 U'�PCk NitJ%IbP.t' 1 Yem�+. i.'Y7P. GH tJil7nYJ27' VP_YrOG7' N�lAt x r, Y� �� •r 1 ti 3 8� i" 2 A i c4 3' � Tc..tals 3ernn �her.fr 14uinber^ Yem.. P»ecX tVumi�er^ i ,_ Ear•2 F �irrder•sc.n .'. fis5c�c 2 f_ar2 F Anaersoi� �4 C�ssor_ 4 7ora2s 3emp �]-�pck Nurrtber^ irn�p �»�r_1t Svurnbpr 3 ..y, ,'7-7SY a N��t�r .+ FY7:f�7 ; Ft7&3 3 FfYS•3' 1✓ Tata35 Twm¢ Cher_ic )VLfh1bP)^ Yemp �Yreck Nz�rnber 4 i A Ficr-c. aA rl2rmesc�ta 4 Ficro oi' )�lnnrasc7ta �4 ficrc. �of tn2 nnesota 1;: ' Tata 2 s Tentp L;YrecH NumUer 3BMp Lt�eck 7�crmber ;, .:, FS � � Rentals S Tat a] 5 7PM(s �hc: ck tuumbc i^ Yern�r �rier_k JQetrnbel` 5 5 A]b2nsan � TaLa 2 s Yemp C»eck iVUmbe�^ Ye�np �»ecx Ncrrnbc=r 7 7 ETPrnre t.crnparr3es Dept ZO-Rdm 7/10/90 �1�srrts List 15-Engr �.tty c.r taendata Me2rjht5 ZO-PoZice 30-Fiee 40-CEO r"�er_cunt �c.de �c.rnmer:ts u.'�2 •-•t;?2*2+•••Y 1R+-14.'+ L�i ca21 �: z+5.-+1:"_Sit-�.�r�-4L� 1d cal]5 L.'+Y -'++;�2II+-..72y34'1•-3� ] d CB2 2 S Z ZT:1 -4+?'�fC-�`'.e�T�-�J4."5 Y�'t --4��2+-�,�-:�5+ L�+1 -++� 9 tia-�7�7+-7�2 t2, 7 -4e' x 2r•-•mi�ff+--� Y 5 -+i'y 2 4h-�2+✓�-j7[r �F:t --4z::t �7.+-'¢r'7tZ+-%P+ y :��-�r� � m-�2s�z+-r�ti� 3 �5-43�Y a'�3a'�-3fn Y+1 --4:3Q'++h-•1 i t2+-1 +Z� 1 ✓-43�2s'•fL F��-6� +� 1:a-4��+-6 S �-5+2� J '�:'•✓-43$irA-1 Y�`✓-2 `✓ 6 �.'�S-1! 335-lC L.34'! -�45 sig�is 51 O)75 3ro qt>� J'ul svc .Yi�1 svr Jlf1 SWG` sul svc Dept 50-Rd&Bridge 60-Utilities fi�9E 70-Parks 80-Planning 85-Recycling 90-Animal Control r�rnoi.rnt :f. � 1 1.�8 9 , 9'? C'.�. �4 misc svlys � raisc 5plys rrt3 sc S02 y'S ' trar�s ,jar_k misc spiys � svr.. ca22 5G. 7ti.+ :5ri9. 9�L+ 43E. Gsh =",=. '9L.o 3. 9G 1 �. ✓3 2 ic+. � 3 i Lh. a',� .:✓�. ft4 ��. 3z3 . SF]. 2:1 3�. 1 E 142+. 7�7 �7_ H7 37. ¢�7 1 YA4. 36 �� t .. ;. � -• � F'. .-^� f'°J r �'� _� , � ; } r 1 c� (j �� 1 - • 1 . � � I - C Jtt2 Y9�Q+ �2alrns L15t F'r2 12:d5 fiM C3 ty c.T )�endata tte2 ghts , �� , TBM(J �hP.CH NLfb7beY` 7 TQrnn. Cnerx �vumtier ver�cfcm tvarne t�acc�e<nt. �acfe ? 1'c�ta 2 s 7ewp tJtrc>ck tvumt�er ? l'e�np �Y+ecX NumbeJ^ :� 8 R&�' T-}utc Sttpply' fl+i -43Y.�%-YA.:iQ-:�k� G'� � t4 .7 L3trtc7 9upp2y' �Y-•4:�+2�.-t-J+:"iZ+-74"+ 5 i� S• J FSutc. 9trpnly" �1-%r33�->5�-3Yt H i� d J Attto 9trpp2y' �DY-43t2+:i-•�4'+ :.�4'+ 8 E� & J' Fruto 9upQ]y° 8+1--�43II!+.:,•-�Dis2-i� �� 'f'ot�]5 Temp �hecH rlumtter tl Temp �hectc hlurnber 3 9 SS N Riattnc:r :4 9ans 3'2-995ff+-84�-S+�h 9 Tc ta2 s Temp �teeck Mcrraiser 9 7'eazp Checfc Nurnver 9� �+2� Fattery, S,73re W�rehoirse 2t2-43�2+:�-ffi.:,Q�-:Srt+ 1rl+ Bat t�r^y S T1 i^e W�ret�c}usc II�7 --433II+-492r- �'¢� � � Tctals Ternp �hecH ?4ur�er 1F+ 4Prnp �heck fVumber 2 2 IS }S�vl.rr Ratct'��2der 2'�-4v23-tZ5.:,-5.., � 11 Kevin �atc:hc2der 7�1-4y2i+1+-21�•-]TT+ .`.` Tata]s 3emQ �hecH Nurnbc_r 11 Tr mp �f7eck 1dz�rnYsei^ 1�� 1;= E�2 Y'TS IYrC �1 -i+�=`tZ+f�-52Y2�^7a'+ 1'� Totals Tem� �t�ecf< Jvt+mLTer ic Temp �hecH Nurnber 1 �• 13 £3nard c�T Water- �orMns ss� c,ners k�a -4�, �`-31 L!r-:5�a 13 i�«at^C c�F tA�ter L'C�A7fr7.455101'rPMS �9-4�:�..,-f��h-4ry�Y.+ 2 3 Sc.arc0 c f i,�aLet^ �o�ntn2 ssi anet^s ni� -�r�':�-31.:;-:sic"+ 3� 'lo7.a2s Fernp �treck fVurnber 23 �ammerrt s par^t s F+ari: s pa>,ts ;_;.�� pa�^t s parts fina2 3y-:� sp2ys , ri� t t�ry reco»d i t i c.i7 �' mi2eage >^e3m� h"rCfna ccnt' exp re2mt� 7l6-16 81b1ey toay svc rlay svc fday svc fiage •� Prmc�unt 1 �'•%a. 38 3 t2+. 43 7 �2+. 9 %4 6. 43 1 t?. T� 1:=. ?✓ ._r� _ 9& •�2 .y 943_ L�✓ '2Y y 5115. ;_:.� 1 3� 8�1t+ „�. ;�3. 2�Qt .. 41.1Z+'2� . 91.36 �+1 , 67 :�3. 63 � ii 1 . Y1�Q+ �vy.a+� �� ' 6 Scr2 4S� �lal�ns L1sT Pr1 Y2:t7.rp �Jo �Sty ot Sdenc3oLa ttp.ights � 7't m{s �t�ecH NUIRhPY� 7'� 7ernc+. iYleck Ntt7nL"'BY^ VG->Y�dGt^ J4B7nB FJCGC'�tttit ��CI.P. :i4 Audget L.taf1t2ri3 SYrc 1L�8�-4`S:S�-•tY+Q�t?�-•��1 i tr Tat•a.ts ?'ern�+ LtiecX toarrn�er 14 iefn{� z.ri�ck )VumL�et^ 2� ]:% i+tir�n5v 2 1 2 e L ttmhel^ Cc• �Z -�4�L:�@-�iL'.+-i:2� s :' 'fcza2s Te�r,T� Cneck �vumt+er 1.:, Temp �t>er_ x rvtrrnaPr x E 1 £ .E;rcice � 2 L�g �+� -433� -�Pf[+-�p,�,o 26 Tc�ta1 s Sem� r:�trwck tV��n�ber 16 �"G-+lR�+ f:172Ck NLtIrtb�Y` 1? ] � .i3a1 a»r! Lawn tivc S�1 -�3� �-31 � ,3t. 1 % Yc L-a 1 s Yanlp �nPcx 1Vtrmbc r 27 Temp �t�er.M NurnhPr 45 1$ �Car•]son Tractcr � Eq II+1-433t2-4�a+-:�t 3t.1 �ar3scn Tr�ctot^ & Eq {h:l-43�Q+^45II�•-�2+ 36 TULaIs i�ernfT �J7eck NumaE?r Y5 . . 7ernp �nec,X iVurnber Y9 ]5 Lh2�1Yi fiUb135h1»t,.j.. �-4;=11p+-�fctiQ+-•�N 13 7"ota25 7P_h7� �YTPck )Vcrmber 49 Ternp �neck ?3urnbPr^ �=`¢� 2'i?� �.tty Mctar- 9up{a2y �71 -tr.=.m:,-�¢r.:.�z+-•:�G? ��+ C.t'ty 1hC.tr_�t^ 3trpp.t}� Yr7-433f[+-46�-•3Q+ �'�7+ 1:3ty t�lc,r•c.r Su��+1y �+7--433>2-44k�=��2+ EYA Tcs'L'2+1 s Tem�, �»ec:t tvurober 2Y� TBh747 �nerk TJLtJ%1bP7^ �iY �:a �crntn] ss2 c.net� c�T 3r^s¢t ��-�4�rZu�-9IIT�-] �i fiage 3 `., � ' ^ -r R , � ... r ♦ CommenY.s firnottnt , , Sp2 yc 'c^�. 4G � ,-� 3. �r c � j :`3 sol ys y �9- �:=, y �r5. . � � "� rpr�s sotc] r sys f+��- t7�2+ �� 4�P+. �2+4°r � f �i c]e�nun/mcni]-�]y svc 3'�Y�i+e2+ . " � �'"�". tbir+ r ; � " ' 'LJ . part s:39r.= •- 1 E.S+. 51 . . ..�sarts 31?.36 • �-, . • ------ V � . _. c f , r. . 47b. 7! - • .. - �' ) b2 d ad fist� P3 eY d �9. 3.s , � ; . __.__._.� i3al. 3J -. rn2 sr. part s 1 si. 3ti"� p�rt s •�3. '�s6 aarrs ��.97 E•ti'+. Y3 EiYfYYi i22 ..yiS2+. Y��c+ ' s .�•+-ra zg9� �sairns L15L- �r2 12:�+5 flt» �3ty oT Me»hc�ta HeightS Fr>m{3 �f�eck }vur�tt�er �7 Terap. r.neck )UltIJ1L'+BT" V2YiG�C�T^ TOarne? ficcaur-rt '�o0e �7 �<:,rnms ssS �i�,e�^ c � Yi^sQt �P�--%+4�h�•-•:t ¢�� -•t � +i i Tcfra. ] 5 YernQ �hec•;r r+7crrrrber :?x 'Temp �»ecx f�urn�e�i^ �i3 :'�� anunerc]a2 �rsn:�a2t a+1-�vii:=,=•-�,��-:,�1i '9'c.tals Ta_+mp L'neck tvurnber �t: 3'Prnn L»acfc NcrrnbPt� �., "� £:arnrn �Centet' L'�2-433Tcy•'tf6�'�-•3L9 �?3 ��rnm r:.ente�^ 72+]-43:3Q+-44�-i=.¢� 46 7c�S�1s i'era¢� �r�Pcu tuurnbet^ �3 'Tt*rnF �t,eck ;duntt+et- 2�r �1r �ony Equpsscar.2r�o fir-oocrcts YZ+1-r+3rz��3•-Q+7in-7Y ;�'ii Tata2s Tcn7p �»e�ck ?Viirnber� 24 7etn(J �t�pc.k Nttt,7ber ;.:✓ '�'. f7akc�ta �c.ctnty T�ch Snst �2+1-A4�n2�-Q+32Z+-.3a'+ ::!�.l Fiakot� t�ounty 'f'ech Sr,st t2+1-k1f2+�2'�-4+3�-3¢r 5m 'F'cf.als Fernp IIJ�ecfr Number c`, Tvni�+ Che:ck tvurntrer ;?G 25 3arnes fiar�1e25ar, �✓-ri47:�-1�-1:'� .�� Tot a i s 3wmp L:hP_ Ck tvumtrer n 7em�+ �heck �ltrrntret^ 27 � i �i,� cxs 9eweT^ Cl »g :t .:�-933fi-49¢+-Sm'+ '� 7 'f'cta15 iamp �heck fuc+mber ;'7 Temp L'Y1erx Nttrnber :?3 ��•� .�'ierrrrl5 f5E2lncmt �1 -�44] :�'�-��`4i-�.'ih n t arnment s mar,iral n12 x Y`�7Y`S �^pi^s 1 Jur�e r.c.p3es t�az n7.�t crse ha�7 MdL Cl^SE' , Ju2 a12cw rprs Yltl Eti3C�W FaOB 4` fiirrtaunt �, m¢+ T.�✓. A�2'+ �477. 3? 4 i 7. 37 �, , _ , 9 i- t2+. int� � .. 9:�'7Z�. gi�Z+ - 1 �=`tt+. f�Q� ~), 5 jir], 23`yffi �2a1ms List �r] 9:':tZ+O �M �1ty c,f hfP��c]ata ?-]eights r `'s � TBM� '�heaCk 7VUu7bE.PY` 1=£s Fernp. £t�eck N�rn7ber Vendc.r Narne? fiicct.rycr»L �c.de 2'L'� Tc..�aAs 7'er�1p �her.X Jdcrmb�r c� Ta_nir_. L7,ecK Jvt�ntbei^ :�9 ;vy Nea22:Y� fis^cr�c•tlon Serv]ce.s ft1-�r'��r4-L��Z-•:3�:+ ;� TC t.a l s ?a_�n� Lt7P_ Ck tVttriiber ;��J Se�n{� Chec3: tJurr7bc=r :3�+ 3a3 Ft�s �aps r•as �aarxets rirc,ua �.ro1 -��r�'+--s x�-s�z+ s� Tct�ls Ten�F+ t:neck Ncunber �T7+ TEmD C77Eci2 fVctl'Rbel^ �y i1 F7^LP.WEtY Rad2atcr 9YC i�$-113:3�-'it4L.''�--3Y1 31 7c L a 2 5 Yentp II»Pck tdumf�rvi^ 31 3'ern� �t>eck Nttrnb�r 3: � 3� Fri de» Cr1 catel P�] -43fi0-] 2 Q+--2� 3:� . TotAss Ternp �»eck roe.tnrber 3',3 Ternp i:nPcfr 73umbet� 33 � 33 � iJ Fi �arn rA:! -4 21 t?+ 33 • Tc.ta 2 s T��rr�r C»eck 1vun�i�ei^ 33 7emp �necf: Netrnb�r ��t+ 3•t Sapher ttt� 8• Sheet J�let a 2 g+2 -933:a-34 8+ :,II+ 34 flc.pner Htg � �neet tnetal �+2-%r3'J,,-3:ttZ�-?� , 34 {�c.�pner f-itg 4 Sheet rfeta2 33-�r� ?.:�-318�-6� 1 ��? 'S'crt� 1 s Tem�C Lt7P_ Ck tvcrnTbcbr 34 Tc�rn�t C7'�PCX 1Ju1'nbef• �:� �:"• Hawe Nanx �,x -•tr3a'��;-c.'+:��+•-��+ � c.rnrnerrt s empY L�nys9rals SVC Y`P_G :^nrs �.':�3� pasta[re sol ys a1] 7'QY^S i^p�^s • , r�nrs , sntys �agr� ` �} - _ .. . , . � �� i"� �mc�unt. Y c.�k'+. a.*tt25 r� � Z , 2+46. fnJ+ �'+� Y 1'�-�. H 6, tUfG+ w� �..� 3. �7i�� 5. �r�+ , 1 39_ &�Q+ � £+. rinD �' � �} 'c"3. Q+fi r� ��'3. .�.'+ • , �L � , r 1 E.�'i.II+fU • • £�3:__ 4+� . - ] �+7. 4p+ 9 �.'+T. 4�2+ , 9 ka7. �.� 3i=�,^_. 2'i ��.u+y � 6 J' cr 3� z39¢r Fr^] 1ti:a'�S FM i em�+ �f�ecx tvcrmt+e�^ 3:, 7ernp. i»eck 7VUfnbel' VCYrdCY` tdBtOe 3`✓ H[}WP_ t43Ylk 3✓ tidWP. N2Y�H .x.✓ fldWe Na17k 1 4Q+ TC�t•Ei15 i�P_IIJD t�'I]EC}c N<lfnber^ 7t?rr1�+ iyl7ec:k iVumber 9C� :St? i'icTY(}EYi ?�r'!iT'L�i7y 3F• iotal5 i'arn�s �flPc7r tvuntbee^ 7eufp i:t�rer_x NumDer �7 37 »aT� �o :3'? M,a 1 f? �o :S'% )i3]P. 'L'G 3".' Ha2e t_o 37 M�1e �c.. 3'"i' t!a 1 e �C. �a'� c TOt3I S i ern� �heCk fUetrabBt` YeraFr IItfer.k Mumber 3?j �S I D 5 �8 F � 9 .35 2' TJ 9 �l3 Y t'� J 3.r.s 1 � � 3� 3 t"� 9 �5 Y � � 3P.� I t'J �3 3'�a S t� 9 9E� S 'a 9 3r3Yr Tata25 Yen7p �hech JJtrinber• 3ern�+ �trc:ck )vu��ber 3S ?9 I L 1+1 fit f't T ; t9 F f� f+1 r`t }? 7 7i3 'Fc�ta]s 'iemc� Tr�er_x tuur,lber Temp �trPck 1Vuml�r r +rQr �k'+ 2d�7-rtl 153t rr.. x.la.lu�s i.tst ��ty c�T 7�IP_1'�dC7t2 rteig»ts f1CCOL1YfC LC�tlP. c�:Y —N �i:�J—�Jii�'Ji� Y.'Y ^�4.y..45:J-L?r7iZ+^7'¢+ tZ+Y -v3¢+L -•Q+7�'�-'1�2+ �:t tZ�9-• 4 9 6t� -+h�`+¢+--£� 4'� 3t L.''�:t -433�Z-44Q+-�=Y.+ t2+2 --43 x>2+-w6�Z+^•3Q+ �zti -y3�t�...�r4:�,-�ra5 i2+I �--4,_I:SYr"49+Y�-��Y+ tT2 -4337�+-455'+-it9 13-433Yt+•-49�-�6Y+ :;i 4'+1 ^4337Z+-ft3t2+-2Tn Q� 1 -+t3:lP'+-+FF Y+-3Q+ ahX -433�-ti9�.-+��+ Yd 2 -+Y �7£�$+•�-tt+t3�-flP+ £a] -4i53-7'il5✓-9:� Y+�-433�2r-•45Q�-1 � �8-y33�-tc��-�4'oh �T�9^44'J�3e "itl$fA-'tTrtZ+ 2 .:�-93 3�7.%-�r3R�-o 1Z+ �'+1 -H49+2�-•i Q�9-�5+� 39 m1 =�..''Q� ii? lZi1 -4:t 34_'1 7 YL+•-11� 37 mi -�r�,¢+�-rn�--�-:��+ L'Ql11)112Y � 5 1^� 1? Sp1 Ys r� i sce.eerot Pane 6 Farnount 3. * �CY` 1 `3. ;�-4 3. E��cl^ i'_'F�. 41 pumu rerrt a 2 �5t2+�� n3 ��(R�' +"^� G��a �` �v��z. �m � .nas Qcrrap rers nas pt�mn r�+rs nas {��rrnn rpr^s gas purnn rprs t3c7S �.111Il1Q t'DT'S nas purnp i^�rs July rnt.c» Jul mtcrs .7 t11 7/tr, cr'} Jul mtcir J tl l Ifl'C CYr J"ul Svc Jtr2 nrtcn .7u1 mtci� Jttl mY.crr Jt�l rntcn Efi:� �ayr^c.12 i�f:t^: payrt�l.t qtr^2y cnn 7�?. i�L+ 7c . 2�h ��_ ��n Ii. L121 7::_ ,�✓ Tc"'. �.:i 433. 3+I+ � /N'V v� 7�. 3Y� Y :s. �:� 7 �. 47Z� 4 ✓. 1 � i. 'iJ `tQ+. 3 � ,?. 7rh 5. 7T� ��. .�'1� L''1�. EiL.Te •r_�v. s� ] Sfn. 99 F74. 44 •�c��,. s•� 1 fi�?. a"'+Q� � E Ju2 1994� fJ'2 2',=':a?�8 f-''1h ' Se�mp tyneck ?�t(h7L�BY` �'Z+ 'S'erne. '%J7P_ CX Nt.trnber^ vP>'rdor� roarne +�� TC.Yaxs T�i,�{� �ner.k 1Vurr�her 7�:mt� £lnpc}c tacu;Tbr�r^ �Y �s .Yar.aSsen t.�tC .:• Ft'11t7 �r 1 Tota:t s Ten�p �t�ecx tvunit�ei^ 7BIn0 �hPC?[ tdurnr.+er- �r� �r'E ria>^ firc�dair.Ls 4;� riar }=rc�ducts 1f� 1<BT^ fiT^C�dttC75 H� fiar firaducts �•,_• tCar� Frcducts 21 Yh 3ot:als Te�ta{s C»ec:t iVcrmbei^ 7emp �t�er�. Number �3 ts3 JS»C�x Ltrrnbet^ 43 JU9C+x Ldniber �i3 1�t�rcx ie.imGe>� � �:� 'TC�ta25 TBRiFi LYtecX tvttn�ber Ternp �rrPCH tacrmbPr 4�i f+4 Y.ritttSGYr Rt�bbl5h SB1^v3ce J44 iate32 s Tc mp �?7eck )dcrral7er T?fl1� i:hBCk tJ13fAbP_Y' H✓ tr:� 'Fnc�mas xr-,utt� 4� Tt�cmas tSntrtrr 4:� l'hi.4rtc75 HYiUt77 4:1 7T�c.mas t<nuth 1 L�Yl� Tar.�2 s 7erap �t�erk Nurnner FentF+ �J�eck fvt�nrt�er 4G 46 fir�er_hs tPf]ce t��Gh3ri25 �f L.laims 1_Sst t_3ty cf 1)er�Rat�a t1e2oY�ts Frcr_airrr. �c.qe r1�h :t `✓-+ly.'iL�'1_'4 1fC+"' 'r.�Y� 41 �2 -43ui.:,-in�s2=:=+2� �Y -•4 �'Y�'�-•t2'+3�-•3�1+ $�i -+f.Si�J`J-f'�:.1Qr-�YJ +DY -•43tn:'-Y+7ro-!�1 2 :�-r+.�.�i �.:f-i7+GL.a-G$� 4-� 2+ 3-' ir 4 E,>2•-+T� �2+¢1-•n'� �.'+ 0Y -•+�3¢�:1•-R'�7ffr-I�Y+ i212 -tl3�T.+:✓-ts+7'2�-•7i�1 43 � 5- ft 3 3: s- Y£+ffih -4+i.'+ 44 36-t7493-q4 S-'t`�k'+ K�9•-�%'11 �+"fhiBQ�-k^�L.'+ �-4�� %-9 L.45�-4 :✓ ��L}�1 � J�'.i �ry��'� J �� t�7 -•4 �Lnk'1r-•] 9 r[+-1 Q3 fGM/17PYJi 5 T'DY'S m2 sr_ c�arrs mzsc a�r^t.s raisr_ ��,rt5 11735C �dJ^t5 rnssc n.art.s rni sc so2 ys nt1 sc sQ2 p�s m3s_r 50�Ys Jt+n svc Gi^c7Er'C tn12BEi[]E pr�c�7ect n711eaae m2 sr_ rni ] eat�e ,3'lr1 ailoW t.yne r�b» Fane 7 / .I i�� JQ� i ]'i- ��P 4i. 54h %+7. r7.4� �7. �t?� 97. E}ib ++.-'_ 7E: .=';3� . 3G '75. 37 �re. :�a 43. Y 6 � Ei'3. 8� ��. '.33 ��3_ :33 �9. 39 1 49, i?ti 9 �_ Fv�.'r 3 N. utiT+ c 13. :1G'� 7_ ✓Q+ 7 _ :��f+ �, f� J•ct1 133Q+ Fr2 1;=sih� F7tl ' TPn�p '�necx 7vumber 4& Terop. C»ecu �viemt�e�^ venctcr Narne 7C�i:cl15 7'F?Ir1F7 �t1eLk )vrtAli?PJ•' TP�np �hec�: lvcrrnt��r 47 4� 3_ £ i. :7 �� 7c•Lals ien��x �ttv_ck iVcrmher� Yemp �'t>ecH Na�rnber^ �i:s �r5 Lae�y ttuslar�ner 9N iiuy f{ullantl��^ �b i3cry tsullanoer �fa iicty htil2a»de�^ 45 i3cry rtc�1]anner i-+ii�+ 3c�ta2s TPn�� Cf�er_k �vcrmi�er� Tc�tnp �Yteck Nc.�mber tr� ri5 1<c�c7et Firctr £r�ct�A iYEi 9:J hSc�deL• r'irr_t1 L��^cu� 2..T3'i 9£� Tafa25 Yernp �hec7< TJu�nber 7emF Cf-�eck fvc�rnr_.er �Z+ ��r'n Lannusa Ndwe �rYA T��ta2s Ten7{� z:.i�eck fVc+nTber 'T P.IYf{J �hP_C}f TJIt/I717R1' ✓7 @2 LBXL 2 BYiD Fc�T^(] JS 'i'c.Tals T�n�{� �»er.k tai�rr�r�ei^ TP�np f:t,eck tJurnbc.r �:? `iy' 7d Tnarnas Lc'iWc�11 ✓;? 'Tc.ta15 TernF+ i�fier_k fvunrber- Tc:mp £:f�eck tvu�nYler �� :✓.� Leagt�E Mn 2:1't]e5 �1a3ms Llst L'1ty oP taentlata htc-+sg»ts f�ccc..t�nt tic�c;F 4E +I+Y --;:�Qr7� +i T � -•�r4 i `,•-a'��.'n�3-�va`+ Y*Y -44 7 �-� 2 9 Ytr-� +Zr ff+�:-•4� ] �- 2 t2+:`. •-1 � t�'+1-•44::rv.+-'2 t2+�-4I�3 i3�•-•�4;=E,5...&� �ll-1 � 4� ��3-•4; ,�-S�Zrfi.+-�fntb 1�9 -4L?c:1Y+•-L.4Et$-•{1riZ� +f5 ff+Y -433i2+-+st::t8-3bg :1Q� iir� -•+r33f.n-4Sfi.� -��i0 :f 9 �i—��7 �—y �,z+—a�r :i� th] -��4L'!�tF-1 1 �-'Y rt+ f' cw�rn�nt s .Je�] dues mi 2 e�ne r�•e:! mts m.t .2 eac7� �^eimt rni 3 eatie r^e2 rnb exp relr�rb BXU Y^P11nU i fie fiarx snel ber• Re Farx she3ter pa rt. s parts 3y15 Tu1 a31oW attes 7 *Z+:�. rr7 �i ��:. �i% ] T'..S_ L!�F+ 1'.T`✓. l.hL.4 3s 9R£+. �.'+t?' � z Ju1 23Sih f']a7ms i3st f=r7 1�:�7.+� P70 C1 Ly c�f Mei�dc.ta He1 Atrts ' TE?!p}7 t:hP.CH tJtttllbPT^ �.''• TPrnp. L'heck ,Vti1I1L�BY` b'BYrdC�Y` NciLTP ficcCt7riL' i+'C.�Ge .:".3 Tc,z a2 s 3ernn rr>Pr_ x PaczrnbF r _� 7ernn �Yieck ?Vumber• ��r '._°�r1J LP_P.Y i�+i^OS 4'+:i—sf��:'�'`".—:3:1'4.i-•,""jV.1 �4 t_�ei" E�r.n� �Y-�t33'_--39�-'l'Fi ��i LePY' R'r^�7y 7✓-�=3:r-�i2L7-[+�.0 s�� iaLa2s Te�,�{� �heck JVuraber ::,y 7ernp Lnecfr tournt�er ,... �� a3]2:larn w �a2zv 3_e �2a1re �3-3�a3� icLals 7enTp �»er_k )vumber� �;.:, Yvrnp �hec�: ?Ocrmner �£ �h. J+1 � F t� Fi tZ�2-'itl�7fr+•-11L3-2L�+ :�f_: in C� t? r't ID:f-�r�rrh4-•1 �t+�i-1 � s x •� Tat:ats 7ernp �f-�ec7t rournDPr :�G Tcn7p �ria_rk lvurnber �,? �': t�ac t�ser �z1-�e��2r�-Yt�3�.o-•3v.+ �7 'intak s semc+ L`f�ecx tv��mt�er :,,' Temp �heck 1Vcttnber �%5 • .:t.�3 tned =:B»tPY`S }-7 ?=' 'C+Y -iiZ�74 � f� Meti �e�,t�rs r! � �T+1 -41 3:t •-1 9 Q�-2 �h :,5 faen �en�Prc N ?= rhi-•4731-�G�-��L� ��d ihecf i:enzc rs M f �2+t -•v:t 32 -m9�Z+-?+2a :�5 teed �enters ti fi thY-�Z:.ja-��Z+-�.�er ��F.+ Mec7 Terrters H fi Y+1-•433i-Y+7�--"!'� .:i5 Meo �enters N �` '2+��-A131-1�h�-1:� �E� Me�J �:ei:L-Prs }9 fi tZrGl-4�3:r12+�P12'+-Y�'Q� :18 leed t'.entc_t�s M fi 1:i-sr�3]-Q+f��-r.:�Z+ �r:?'G TC.L-als SF+mp �heck t�trrni�e+r ::,t3 ? f.3filp I:hP_CH TJttfn2?P.7' �=7 :�'3 f*e»tic: a HPAghLS F�t�bts3 sY�� Y2+7 -y� b� -3:1 �^;:titi i :C�IIIf!lEYiT, S JttY/ SVC ��lfl'J SVC^ .7crn svc •rr[r wac c;7n rnnrsriF mbrshp renewal Jtr.l pY'Pl�i .iLf.i �71^EhJ .7Li] EyC .?'u1 svr. .T2J1 5VC J'u2 svc 7tA.l (]i^P_IrT .Yttl prPn� .Yl.�], pT'P_177 Jt�ri svc Ftrnc U>'rx 3i �ti6. t'.t1II y�,_:1�+ A4. ."".�'� ��.::c!, 1F3. JL.'� �?f'�Y.+_ a�*1+ :?'k.'+Q+. 72+4k CJ. �L� c':t. 72rrY+ �¢�. �z+m x � 4�;3. �4p 1 T :?c3. 3 m :^, y �7_ s� 4��. iZ�O :yQi_ a�+�', 4r1+�4. E4'+ J7:7. �Lh Y Il44. 6YL+ �(,ryf}� F.QI 'i, �94. rr'� , �3. �:? � s sus 193Q+ Fr2 1•�:$r.�.s firt 7'En�p �Y,ec^k rovnrt+e�^ �9 ?'ern�a_ L'riPCH Nc<Int�Pt^ verrrJc.r Narne m9 rter,�ata 7-Seinhts R+.�tei7.tSn' :» t�efidc�7:a `Tc�2gY��•_ 72irttt�.ish" t'9 ;)c:i�rc3r.ia rsesAtrt:s Rut.�t�lsr.� 2:3£ TC�'t�t5 "1�GfIlU f'Y1PCH ;�til�T:J@T' 7'em� : �eck Wur,tbc:r 6¢� E•w� t4etr« �aast.e �o•r•,t>^o.� t3LS }�12t1^C Wr�lG�2 L��YJ2�YY�3 :t :?Y� Tar•�1s 7zrnc+ f'YherH Juu�r�73ea•r TFrn{_7 �hPrk Tdcrmber E1 r>y M1 d ttrne�^i caYr i.. .fi £:r. 61 TGta1s 7'-r_rn{_2 �ner_•x td�rntr]er^ 7er,�{a �ner.k »c�r,7L�e>^ i,:_ G:? ?nit7west �'`ncto Svc h,c. 1�f]clw�st �hatc. 8vr_ 1'29 'Fc.t�2 s TQmp �»ecf: fJi�mbPr Fpm�+ �Y,er.k )Vtrntber 53 E�;3 ;�19 ] 1 er fir�l nt 9 ng La.i , 'ic.tals Teinp C}�eck wttrnb�r TEG7�+ �hecl: NttfflhEt` EA E•4 J�3 nn �et 2 er2 ar^ 'Fe� e�a E4 101 t�l•'r Cel .i tdl �t` Tt32 e�n x .�� 7cta3s 7'ernp Tneck 1Vtt�nbB]^ Ten7� �»eck fvurat�er 6;� t�.:� 7�]rn-re.sot�r Lc�cXs 5:' 7c�ta2s Tvnrp i;nc:cH tvc�m�er Cla.ims L.tst L1 i: V p1" �enar..sa HB1 �17t5 Ficrt�irn� ncrae i2+:! -H i�f1 E`r-J Y i�� "'7�•�.•� :s :`•-�,r:_ :L'h-�+7 �a-Ei:.3 iZ+]'-4'�='.'i3�-'�i : �':-�;..i�.,"h `Y � 1 :� -•'+� f .3 •••�8a: -- r.,z� 1'7'"'':°��7� 6 e�+ L; i '-+?'� :1 Y:+-6"�cSa-•:=L.� 6z tZ�2 •-•+'iUi.v;': --LS�-""a'�-•;:iLi �1 --9J11+;'-a:�3G?••-3�ri r�;�. Sh:t -4:_': �2+-] :3L�-1p+ E3 � 7-'4�: f°+4h-5 2 S+-:_ iT.+ mi —4��,z+m-�� n-��r 69 L.'+1 -433t'�•••y+Ht�a-�t[r b3 t:ammer,r. s .!471'1 SWC Tc�n �vr. .3'un se•r_ .TLIi 5VC .Yct2 svc Yn r.as;ls Jun svr. 3�.ri�r svc T^D'G COVP.Y'S TL73 S'�C J'±r2 svr_ svc ca]2 �age 1ti� � " - ' ' - �� Frr,Tc.ur,z 49. t3'.=-' �+9_ :3� AY:. 4� �9:f.riEi :� � """.��.. i+r 'ts 7�SEi. �L�L`Y` :9Ji. '19E�. G�Fa 2 :3 �. 7Y+$ j �i_ �{n �. 7tj+ 4. �3;� :! 3. 5.:� a • � Ju2 25�+ Clairns iist F)^1 g:?:�f� �t� '�Sty Oi' ME»dOt� )i[:lghts � 7e�nf7 L'hPck Jdurni�cr 66 Tern�+. �nPaf: �vz�rnuer^ 1'P..Yn7GY' lJBlO.P. Hccc.�rr,t Lode t3L: 7�f.117Yr ilP_�t .�Y WPVPI'JtfL L.�1•-4�[�'.L9"L9'�'�+k'�-•�k� bt: Fc�t.a3.s 7'Pmp i:i�eck Nurnber rE 7emp t.t�ecx fvumt�er E�7 ii7 7�itr>» ;�lcrtc�ax L:lYe 1i�s ir3--:="�97'�r 6:T ;hil97�i t?+.IL'ee�7? L.SfB Yi�S 7L11-•-41�1-4'+`r?�Z+-�e�"+ 6T M2Yi>� iHtttt�a2 iife TY75 4�2-4131�-�h772�-J� .^.Lh:c TC.:.�-c� i 5 7'BA7:R �J7ECH Ntl!'r)t?EI•` C% Tema �ne.ck fVurnz�er- &5 65 r�:lr�nesata £+eneTit Fissn tni-�=�.'�7�+ 6H tri.i 7'lY7P_ St:.'t c7 1:tB17e; .t t f3ssl7 �Z+i -•f+� :sl -•1 1�--] L.� iiFi »7»nFsata .E;ere.TSt Rssrr Y'��lS.Yi.i-S'�✓-SJ f5t] :72�•ii��sC�r� EtF�,ei".:� rrssn Y+1-�4:�3Y-i?��k�•-`�tL� 5$ 17.tn»tisC+f.a k�eriBfiL' �isSri �S-+:1�Ti-E�L�-✓K �t� M1rn��sota $ei,ef'1t i�+ssn �Y-•49 {:t--•�'+'Tb.T�•-7'�.'� z 2� 163 nr�esa� a fiene f2 t F4ssr� 1:,-%+:� 3 i-ih6tZ�--t=,�X+ �': E 3c�: a; s ;�mp L:»cacu Jvcrnrber E,t� TPrn{a �necx rsum5e.r E�3 Ei5 Mii.»Psota Feamsters L.c,c 3�� O.+i-=,�¢7;_, 69 tainnesc+i.a ;'eautstPrs tar_ ��z+2r c�Y-�¢17:� 13t� TuLals 'S'emp �Y,eck Nerrnbe>^ 67 Tern�r �hc: ck rvz�mber� 74+ 7� t,i»rresata Tcr�o Irrc ¢�2-�r��:�-•¢+7oZ-i"Y. 7�h Mlnnesata Tol^c} S»r_ �2-43:i�A-49�'+•-7� 1 >tZ: :"ota5s 3emn �f-�eck �vurnber li[ iernL+ Tyhec'r, iVttmJ7er ","3 �3 (61i �L:t]'i i-`[fT7]SC Sc3TPY•y �I-Yi_=`G.41Z+-61L!i-i:�N. ?Y f�)M r�E�pt fittt�llc J�feL}r �1-4c�r2Y�--G1L.4-�:.� 2 +aL� . Tc.. a t s i er;r{� i`•;�ecx rvurni��r i1 ient�-. �Y��rk 7dunlber 72 �c�rnrnent s raei� tax Ju] �rern Ti�l �+rern Ju2 prem 3u1 prem ,itfl �11^P.fil Ju] prern 3'ul p�^en� Ju2 Qr^e,n .Jct2 prem .7uI pr�em J'un due.s ,7u2 dues parts 1^Qt^5 conn cnos ccn,io rhas fiage 1] r'�rnc�cr»t 4�Y+. ;?Qr 4Q'+. i.'�SA 37. 4..r 2 L'� 1 . :S•� :a1 t'�. 'h7 1 �,��. iAi2 '3fi. 7Dt2r ':�9t?_ fl:� , t .Su] 13'9+D F�^3 �'�:t2�£3 �}0 • 7Pmp Lheck 1�cirnt�Pr� 7'.= Ternp. �ner_k ;v�rnner ve�,ac.r ty!amc 7� Jdatd �'i�^e Frc.4e.r.L.to�o -,� ` Tc�tals 3"e�np C;�ecf; :vumbe.r Y�rr:sa Ct�r>cH ;vum�ei^ 7;1 9;� Nard3rr2 F'lre L=q !3 1Var�d.t �03 F'2 re fi°4 1 +i13 TcsB�,is ieriia T�f�eck :�crrnber Ten7p i:f�eck �vurnt_�ei^ %4 : •r Ncrt>et^n r,2 r t:arQ 74 )dcr�i�riei^» Hit^ Cc.rn 7'+� tac�rtJ'�e.�•n Fi] r^ CorP ;�� ,� 7ota2s T�,-an L^t��ck iVLiGT�'+B!^ 1`P.flf[? £:f�PCH i4tt7rbE1^ '�� 7�: �txygen 9e>•vl ce �o 7� L�xygen 9er-vice �o 7;'.'� �xygen Se>�v3 re �c TaT.a25 TP•hT(J Check Nc+mrser, Tetnp T.'necx N+.rrnber '7s 75 fi � Rescurce i� Tc.ta2s 7P.b7�+ t�necx JVurnber 7e�np �1-�Qcx rvc�rrt;�Pr• '97' Ty F � f+taga: ine % ,'" TaYa.2 s Temp i:Yreck hurnner 'rernp Trlecu Nevnn�r- 73 75 fiapvr� �a5 Stee] �c. i� 'Tor•a2s Tenr�� rnwrk �ucrrnt�er �]a:tms List C1ty at' rie��Gct� Hatonis f5acc��t�nY, t:t.de Q1:i "'if 4Y�'J "�`.yry... � �ry 7'� L!+:� -'43L�✓-ti9�7E-':iY 4�y i •'•+F:3Q�;1-..ti7:3V�'-3t'+ T` �.'+i�-43� J-�1i�Cb"'i�i.q L9 L'�-•+t:33:f-Q'+r%nb-•44L.'+ YC+t3-'�'F �� '✓`-Y+�L?"y','�k� 7 �t Yt+7 -4'.'JY:',-tA3Y�-•3tcti �1 -•ir 3Y�� -��3�.�-3iri �Z+i -ri31`t�::i-�7,34�-3�t 7� tC� -�ritL:_-•1 2 �-112i 7E� S+i -4�iL��-2 5�--31'.'+ yl � s-�� -��.�a-a� '! 6 t.�omraenr. s nrhi^s;�n c±+.res SOYyS Lest r^�rs �^p�^s r4ars splys ac4 t»�^ct s/1:� splys renewa2 rerrewa 1 parts fiane 3� t�mc.0 nt T�. Y�r�'+ 7'�. a?�� 3H;=. ,_ 3fl. ��k� 3"S . ¢� I 771. 7� 3<r, 9J 3�_ 37 ii�44_ 9 5 ��. s� � 6 .7sr2 1 y3�."� �fa3rns z_ist �'r.t 1•�:�� fiJf C1ty oY Mendota Ne.tc�hts Tcrn� �rrecu tvctrnbPr- 7'9 7p, fi7C+. �Y7P.CX i0tin7�P.1' VE�T'tL70T^ Narncr NC..`CC.rttri% i'UGC1�^ 7�t3 fZr�aYt3 it�SCtiE L.'R� -u}.i3T21...itryr2+.�•�.L:s %:7 ftC.rtitl fiESCtiB tT+:i'-'�J:3ikh-ii+Tg-^:=`1[1 2'.' �9 'ic.t,�2� 7'en�p Cn�ck tvunft7er 7� Tc.m{a �3�eck Pfctti�Yxer� St%+ 9� hcrfPr#dge �c�t�nson Eq Cc� �2+1^%�;.'i.�6�-E.i¢+-:'�C� x3Y+ Fttr7'i"r.1c?ae 3w�r.»san ica I:.:} ST+:t-�7�.,'.:5-�.0�¢+-��g� 3 da� 'S"ata1� ;emp Lt-iecu N�.rmLrer� 9�G+ 'Tvrnp �t��rx tvunrber� Ci:f J1 .:� S 3 'E?fr3ce Pradttc.ts �,1-�1t3xhQ+-•tZ,=�--;��2+ 8Y TOi835 TE�p7�+ �YIP.Ck N{.t7i7t_'+Bf J2 TP�n�r ��ec^3: Ne+rnnei^ 8;.- a;� g��de 3n R 53�y Tr�ee farrns tZry-•4�rC�YG-•+z��.'�tZ�-Yt�� 9:� Tc}ta15 TPn�� L;�erX rtun�ber E�8 7Prnp �hecx tdctrntser 93 83 i. � :Jhc"tt1�hY�P_55)+' .iY^ ff+7t^+i:�-,...�'`N^'23�^SY t�� L� 9t3c�tegYrrfG:ssy T7^ t�:a-rt'�i?tc7•..232-1✓ 93 L� 3Yt..-'tttt3-ri»e5sy Jt� 5✓-4-�'�. �-133}-F..tZ a3 L. %' 9»,at+ut�nessy .'i^ m3•-4�Y2�'+-••x3�w-�¢+c'� $.Y.. t. L �hc7ttL3hJ7�5Sy ,7t` '�1'-4i=.=Y21"'13c:'^k!+i2 e+3 L � �tsattgYti7assy .7r^ :t ir-4za:?��-'� 3'�-•�?��h 93 L � 5h�unhtfessy .Tr^ SE�-•4�'��--a3�-•Ln�.'� :,:�i � 'f c.ta ] 5 Tes�� f»vc.�H tvcrmG�er e�� 4�r,t�+ �`rreck Ntuintser 94 5+'f J i Sh � �.:2 ey t;c S+1 -�t4 }1?-�:�tc5--.:r�[ Stt J' L :3ttlt?2Py LR ' +Z��-4ft�}r:.-��tT�-�«%f+ r Sh J L Sh1e3.ey �a *2+1-1r�r•.'r,:'•-6'��ta-w�'l+ L�":J,� 'Tcta35 T2rnp �ha_c^k tvttn7t7r�i^ f3�4 'Fern{� �neck :vcrr,tbes- s�� s:! �Cr�.7thV.1P_W 'C37EV $1 *'433'Q?^4i?�^t_C� 2:C�fiTIREYrt S �7'.'t' )^� � parts rer�t: s�+I }rr� rn2 sc �pl ys tt^ee �•eM4va] tra315 fttY� Svc J'Cri�t svC Sun svc J��rr svc JUYi svc rtti�t st�r. � l(Yr 5b'C r•ec rc�ck rec J^t�ck rec rcr.k parts c�+t:f fia:ge. 1:3 Fif�7�T+UY�t 7. ±i+o!% �. ."`.r� i +?. `.�"��k 3Y �. k'.t?+ 9�. T:�` �r�r. •ir.. 1 � '�%3_ b'+'k'� 1 £��. 2 � '�rS. 1 ✓ 1 A4. 1'k'"+ 15'i. A � 2 i 3;iiZ+. $rir 3�:�6_ :.=,=i �x, m��. s�r 1 �� 3. ?C YZ� h .7Lf 1 :t 9`3t2f Fr2 1�:7�'+3 fiM 7ernn iyf,erx hfe.rnlber 9� 's ernp_ �tr�r_ x Numtaer venc�or 74B67C� fJ;s :�c}utnv.tew Cnev 17� ict�7Is Sern�! �»ecH Ntrrnber Temp Criwck lvien�l�er 6G 86 ST. fiaul P�is{�atcn fifi• SFo ic?:a25 Te�ap L't�eck hlun7bel^ Tc.nrp �t�er_x Nurnber 9% 97 Sur•r taewaQapers L�7 9uio tVewspaper^s 97 Sc�n News�apers rYT �un tvewsnapers 4i :aurr Newspapers cf7 �crn tdewspapers �.`.L Tc�tals Terna �heck Nurnber fi�n�p Ltteck lvumb�r Nr3 85 �M F`rc.�ducts �t$ 7c�tals 7��i7fi+ Cnc:cfc Nurarer 'Fernp �necx tvumner �7 93 L� S LJest �amraatnicatic.>rS 89 U � West �onlmuriicatio»s J.a LJ S West �crnrniiYi3 cat 1 ons xi9 L+ 9 west �omrnunlcati._.»s JS iJ 3 LJest �cmmu»3cat2c.r� S9 U 9 West Commc�n2cat2c.ns 93 2.) S tAest �CUAl11U7�3 C2tt 9 GYtS 09 U 9 LJPst �onurrunicatiai�s �5 t7 � W25T �C�!llMitYriCHtic�>i5 SY+} 7otals Ten�p rnecx tvuraber Terap �necM fdurnber 9c.'+ � LfJ ia T o)^rns Uni 3 r,t9 ted 3Y? Tc�ta25 Tenip i;nPck fuu�nbPr �1�71/i75 L1st �Yty af t�enooL•a rfeignts r'iccc.unt T.'acie y'.�. _ 4:3 3+L+- 4`31.'� •- l. tY� q� 1��1 -+t:�iiM1.:�"'f�i=2?+-21[+ SG L+:i -�'��i�-•I 3 �-1 iq �h 2-%t � 4fi--1 ;. kT�-X t�3 iZtl -�}'�+�rLA-Yc'�L�^S�L+ Y2�2 -4: 4�.'�•-L.qL'�'�.o•••Lt�q L93 't}i=YY!-a."�`�iS+-'�IL� �'r�3-4x� 4Y�-•L.''��-•�L.'1 S% � 3-433:.r-�t?+in-�+2+ H G'� �� -��sm-s i�-y,� mi-4, z�-�z,�..�-�}m 4'�S -'ri.i0-Q+Hid-44'i �-9l?I �-1 i2+� •-1 :� 1 :�-+15= 1 �Z -Y�Fi�"6ti.4 Y+1 -4'2. i II+--�2+3�Zr-JY� t2+I -9'?31Z+^Qriid-`..y�� 1 :�^�421 �--Y�6Y�-•GtA L� 1 -�r� 1 �-ti�7�-1Yf �� i."�1 -�49144-+2'it?�-:_N'.+ �� untrnent s parts 4Y�3 vetT sa]e an ar-d ti �� +rd �G9 t�rn nat Frisch h�^o not Ue] t� r�rg »ot S,�cncSrn t+i c7 a�J fiai^k custorn b�i»ds 3tt1 svc Jtt2 svr Jira svc Ja�1 svc J'ttl svc Jt12 svC 3u] svc Ju1 svc J�tll SVC h725C a:! 5017 Faoe �v r�rnou»t E'i�� ?f :� L'�9. 7& 1 +'r%!. I� 1 +14. 7:� '3. 1+2+ :1 .:.. 93 cY2. 4'2 .=4. 7J 1 �t. %:� Sr;x. Y+7 7 74_ Y�;� iT7c, :�1C 47�:. 5� ��7c. 9'Y+ �c7. �+� �1�. 9✓ y 93. ?£i 2 75. 'i:i � zv�. �z-+ +l3. � 7 �7. 4:� +'i9. J3 1 � 31 E•. 96 7�. :t ; 93.13 ' 6 3u] 17�'+2� r-r: 7•�:me �n � 't'Qmp T'necx ?Jumber 3S i' enip. r:»er_x Ncrrnbe:r^ VE'>',cfa)^ Nan)e 91 2Jri1 te[J �tj'e»tral 7l"t�S�P.E 31 t1n#Y,ect �entral irusiee 92 United t+e*i7t�^.sl 7i^ust�e S� tJnited �ez,tra] Trustee 3t;� Totais Tern{_� tSt�ecH )Vumber 9'emp �;-reck Nurnner 3�,� 3:' t3n2ted F2ectr3c �c 32 t7»ite�a Electrlc �o 189 Tata]s 3BATR �Y�er.k Nutnbe.r TBfnta LhBCk }VUMbE')^ 97 9� Urrlted WaY St fiai�l 9:; Tr..ta 2 s 7r mF+ �heck tvumt�e�^ Tera�i �neck �ou�ntse.r 34 34 Urii v aT iJ7.sccrrs3 n y4 'Satals Temp �hr af�c tvirmb�r Fenrn �Y�ecx Nt�Ynbet^ 99� � LJeSL eT�ri L 2 Ye I n5 .�7"J Tat�2s TErnp �T7ecH Wuoiber 7emp �P�ecH Nurnber 96 96 Ficrar�ce bus cus 35 3'c�ta35 7ernp ft�erk fvt�mtrer 7emp rs-�eck lVcrrnbe>^ 97 9? aJ.trrtnr^ap :C• We9nstl»a 97 a4 3 r,t1�r^o� i6 we.t nst s ne 9i L09.r.t17>^cp t• We3r�s't3ne 97 W.t»thr��p & We2nst2»e �1a2rns L1st �Sty ot Me»dCrtc� }ip..trlhts F,ccotrrrt �cde a�:i -�L."�Y+71 Yc91 -�43 9',�'-Q'�5:+-2�2 �+i —4s s�—�r�m-•:,m L�1 -�132-•�7i�--Ti� �� tC 1-�}�$.:�-1�+�77�-3L�+ 7 � --•tr Z 3�-49¢+-�F a�+ 9,a Y�1-.:h2•71Z+ 93 Lh1 -�r��Ss-f��.�.�+-�2to 74 �2 -413'?-�2+33 -3�tr 9� YC 1. -�lti+lP1-Q+28+-y''4'1 36 Q�S -4:=�a'ti-1�''t2i^�ti4 2i1 -•4��?Y •-•1 t'_''l�'�-1 ib t2�3 -4.?:'_`t�-1',:`i7-3+'l+ �2+1 •-4�.°';�-•9:_Q+-.3L'+ Lc.mrna_ rrt s ,rua rn^em 3cr1 �r,em J'ul F+rer7 .5u2 pren� SDS }�'S rnr^s .iU2 CC�)7T)^ regr bal cxs Ju3 pi^e.rn ex� reirntl t�7ay pros )7ay resali�er MaV svc h1c�� 1?� f(PMS1YiLItCYi �age S¢ Amoum: g {i�. ¢�4 �i:i . �4 ti �. 'is :=:t . 93 ;_3�,. 6i 35. 1 t_ 7G�6. G:' �1�?4. 7�4 : i 7. Ein ;=17. E•�[� 3:s�. a'+Y 33�. 8�A 137. 52+ 2 37. 6Y�+ 1 %t:�. LjQ% 1 �r �%. Y+r2 1 s 2�i:l. 33 � ti'3. ttv.� 34'�. 3� �. �u�a. g� 0 Ei Jt�I 173a?� FrS 7c�:�FJ �)0 7ernu T'hecN Nurnber 57 'J'�rnF+. �77 PC k Ncrmtser^ Ver•rcfar^ Name sJ7 W2M'it�r^cD ti� WP11�5t1Y�B J7 W2>�thr^op :F� Lae:tnst2ne 97 41.ti�throp c� Weinst2re 3i w2>•rt»T^c•p i bOe.:L�,st3ne 7i6 ic.Ta 1 S Tam�s i;tre: c. k 7V unt�e�^ Y ] "•f�7 trar-rtl )c�ta5 �Ialrns 2.25s �1 ty aT Menc]ata 1-1e1 yY7ts HCCC�[IY�'� �CC}P. 1 Yr-•4�c•0....1 L?b'�--•Q14S Y &-4;=.':Lh-i i?7�^t�.a�t Q�2 •-4'c'"� T+-•2'��T+•-7 4'� tPrY -%3��-,=i"�-1'�fC+-1 Y� 9% �CJ(1fi7P_Ylt 5 t•Jay rte � [i Re.t i� t�iay fie furlc:,nn and» taay ite w1tL t�ay Re f�ab] e MANUAL CHECKS 12665 20.00 Bill Nelson Pmop acg Z2666-670 250.00 Softball umpires 12671 23,632.86 Payroll a/c fire payroll 12672 2,598.48 Dakota Cty Bank w/h 12673 200.00 Alton & Agnes Berskow refund wac chg 12674 50.84 Donal Currie exp reimb 12675 20.00 Dakota Cty Tech regr 12676 62.26• Dennis Delmont exp teimb 12676 293.60 Pau1 Dreelan exp reimb 22678 12,063.23 ARS Const fina2 87-2 Z2679 402.91 John Maczko exp reimb 22680 7,594.58 Ro So Con�t fina2 88-6 12681 205.76 Kevin Perron exp reimb 12682 88.28 Tohn Hartmann " Z2683 7,261.30 PERA 6/1 payroll 12684 3,667.32 SCCU 6/25 payrolZ deductions 12685 500.00 Dakota Cty Bank " 12686 13,228.50 " 6/25 w/h 12687 4,325.67 Comm of REvenue sit w/h 12688 37,560.25 Payroll a/c 6/25 pagroll 12680 306:72 Teff Stenhaug �a�p exp reimb 1269Z-695 I50.00 softbalZ umpires 12696 40.46 Secy of State election forms 12697 368.30 Tom Lawe1Z exp reimb 12698 104.59 Dave Sorby " 12699 30.00 Diane War� " 12700-704 75.00 Softball umpires 12705-706 340.00 City of Eage softball fte2s&depost 12707 384.11 U. S. Post Ofiice utiZity bills 22708 70.00 MPWA regr 12709 240.00 IAFC regr 32710 1,017.46 Paul Kaiser June service F`age 16 Fi`IflC7 ti rit 5'."".1. II�L.�Y 772. t`c+E 19:`. iL�7T� 3:�. t�ti!� :9� 7✓9_ ?t.'. 1 f'+�ri I c3. Fs3 127]1 229.00 Oak Crest Kennels " 126T.7 38,953.79 Pagroll a/c 52712 7,369.50, �ERA 6/15 payroll 127Z8 120.00 U of M 12713 3,667.32 SCCU 6/29 payroll 12q�9 500.00 Tom Burow 12714 500.00 Dakota Ctg Bank " 12q�8 ... ..20..00 MAUMA 12715 3,234.89 Canan of REvenue " 12.�j��_yZq 120.00 SoFtball umpires 12726 13,687.19 Dakota Cty Bank 6/29 w/h I85,753.17 G.T. 285,876.80 6/29 payroll regr fence removing regr t� r� r'� : � "3 '1 ! .� ri �? ••) } E u H CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 3, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Direct Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist r�t� SUBJECT: Case No. 90-22: Eckles - Variance DISCII33ION Mr. Klayton Eckles appeared before the Planning Commission at their June Planning Commission meeting to request a setback variance to the existing established setbacks (see attached staff memos). RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council approve a twenty-two foot (22') front yard setback variance. ACTION REOIIIRED If Council desires to implement the Planning Commission recommendation, they should pass a motion granting a twenty-two foot (22') front yard setback variance. JED/KLB:kkb z � CTTY UF MENDO`�A HEIGFiTS MEMO June 21, 1990 z0: Planning Cammi.ssion FROM: James E. Danielsonj Public Works Dire r�,� Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist SU&TECT: Case Na. 90-21: Eckles, Klaytan - Front Yard Variance DSSCUSSICIN Mr. Klaytoan Eakles praposes ta canstruct a new home at 2005 Victoria Road. The home immediately west af his is an older home that was the original home an the subdivision and is setback fifty- seven feet (57') from the property line. The City's Zoning Ordinance requires homes to be setback a minimum af either thirty �'eet (30') or the established setback. Mr. Eckles desires ta construct his home at a thirty-five foot (35'} setback and therefore needs a twenty-two foot (22') frant yard variance to the established setback. ACTItJN RE UQ IREI} Meet with Mr. Eckles and make a recommendation to the City Council on the requested twenty-two foot (22') front yard setback variance. JED/KLB:kkb ,, PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION RE�UESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 26 June 1990 90-22 Klayton Eckles 2005 Victoria Road Lot 10; Block 1 Michael D. Dupont's , Variance from front yard requirement in a residential district. 1. The applicant owns a lot on a block where the adjacent street is a single loaded frontage road on the north side of State Trunk Highway 110. Section 4.6(4)b of the Zoning Ordinance requires structures on lots in locations where buildings have been built on one side of the street between two intersections, to be setback so as not to project beyond the forwardmost portion of the nearest building on each side. This requirement substitutes for the typical 30-foot front yard setback. In this particular case there is no building on �he lot east of the subject property. In such instances, the setback is determined by the nearest building on either side, which in this case is the single-family home on the lot immediately west of the subject property. This home is set back approximately 57 feet as indicated on the enclosed sketch provided by the applicant. 2. This is a rather unusual requirement and is intended to control setbacks for infill development where existing structures, built before the ordinance was adopted, have setbacks that are greater than those required u�der current regulations. The idea here is to avoid the loss of the sense of unity and harmony, created by uniform setbacks, by minimizing the degree to which the setback for one building can vary from another. This also prevents situations where new homes, built to the less restrictive setback, block the view of the neighborhood from the existing structures. 3. The applicant proposes to encroach into the 57-foot setback with only the attached garage portion of his house. In addition, he proposes to orient the structure so that the garage portion of the house is located the furthest from the adjacent house to the west or nearest to the vacant lot to the east. This would result i� a setback of 35 feet from the property line to the front of the attached garage as i�dicated on the attached sketch. 4. The applicant, in the enclosed letter of explanation, points out that the 57-foot setback requirement would leave him with a minimal back yard, and he emphasizes the importance of a back yard for a lot located on a major highway. This point is supported by Section 4.6(4)d of the ordinance which states that the above setback requirement shall not be � . Klayton Eckles, Case No. 90-22 � Page 2 applied so as to require a depth of the lot. For the of approximately 49 feet. front yard in excess of 1/3 of the average applicant's lot, this would result in a setback 5. The subject property is located on Victoria Road, which in this area has approximately 38 feet of boulevard. This is roughly 3 times that of the typical residential street, which varies from 12 to 18 feet between the edge of the curb and the ROW line. This additional boulevard space generally reduces the concern for setbacks assuming there are no plans to widen or relocate the existing paved surface within the ROW. 6. We examined the existing character of the surrounding area, by looking at the dimensions, confi�urations and setbacks of other lots along this same stretch of Victoria Road. We found first, that no consistent setback is adhered to and setbacks vary from a minimum of 10 feet to a maximum of 57 feet, which happens to be the setback for the structure adjacent to the subject property. Secondly, we see that due to the unusual shape and dimension of the lots in the area and the location of the structures on these lots, being widely separated in several cases, the sense of unity that this requirement in the ordinance is intended to preserve is so grossly lacking as not to be affected by the proposed setback variance. 7. r inally, the adjacent neighbors, including the owner of the ex:ating lot who also has plans to build a home, have reviewed the applicant's proposal and have indicated that they have no objections. 8. In summary, the applicant's request appears reasonable and in character with the surrounding �eighborhood. We see no adverse affect to the proposed 22-foot variance. ti r ,r�., v'f � �� . ..�`� �� i i( ;�� ° _ . / � ,. a'Z' 'i � �� , �• � . ,� ; � �� (.;. � � � I `«` � ' � y� ! 1 � } � �� ' �` 4� � ,`' . ` �. /l, ,'i V�O. ''�� r ��'.: �\�' �1 ' � p ' �`�,.._- ,f� , / �j,� � ,�► . . ,.f ; � ; <, \ ;'\ � � '" - j �� .. \ t ��:. � �-�-� l � � � ...0 .. . . _ �; : i , �•,,. � '. , ' ' :: -'� ____ � ` , � _ 4r _ _--- ~ ?' ,�. .j i- s_.:. ,. �;. L _ , _— __-� ' �!i . , r � � ' c � C� ri�: �' � � ` -'� ) � �` . y � _ � �' � _ 1 � t fi = • � • � \ �'(r /� j. • .',�,i ' , � - - ♦ �`�� - . w{'�; ..�^' �, i ��..� �aP �\ \ \ !,•. . !�� - -�._.r � r , ` i � �� . - � � { �.� � , , :`; ; w,.,�a ,` `� + . .v . , _] . .Y . ..;�,\'•� � • � � •• ;'j� , � _' 1 � + • � "�'kS� �' • -� • ' " l � / • • `� � � . . _ . ;;:� . �y • ,,, •� �« _ j • � ,A� ; � . _ ,:�,. • +' ` �t � ♦T; \k , . � • � • ` � �r�:1� i : . ,; :.. r: z :" ' • � ��'1 - _ •� .r `�\ ~•'::.. �;'Y ��`�+• • • r � P !i / � •. � . - �v Q � . � D �' . . . � • ♦ O � ~ 4 : ' � •��_ ... � ' • • ��Y' � � �: • • • � • � � �% ' ` � ` - �1 n� .�ii t . � e;'• - • I a I � I G�' • • � • • / i �� ( •/� ' � � � .sy :-S`��"��*".• • �• • • � • , ;-• q$ `��1,� t�� ; �.�r„�,i. ..•,:. ;;;�•.-��'..,,�G, is , - . - ' ' '� 1 , i 9 •. '.-i,i�' ♦.,+•�`O� �� j .�. .�. .I';•�• .!. .I.i• .i.--- MARIE 1'^ � .� � � �'- ..i� • � �Mc��'wsic`.Jo`t.�`. �k «7.j !� t A N E _ .__ � � / ' . � GL p� 17 �,MGSl4i CM.S� • 1 • • • � ♦ • X / •• ��`.^ ' t \` <% I I ' P � �r �, - i I I'� � ' ' . i � ��:/ "'r � +'2�-`."�1c.d.c� �' f � + � ' i I.-Y �w._ _ • • • �'�:'� . �w . .. :-' . � \ t � j" . . • • s ,-''t �-^ �" _ �- ' -' ' t t 1 , � • y � i � ' • • K.Mv�[ Cr11CaE • �..�.._�"-a4 = • � ' _ . � ..—:�ARIE' � � � _ � � t� ir� � . . � . w • . . i � w� nu� ��u � t ` ,j•. �• • ' . . • • w � �" � % *• • I .• .. ,4 ;�\ • y • • • • • � i • � • ,�� !/( � ,L= • � �{ � � i! t • '= . s s * � • z � ru "ll: t ^ .i ' _; °� `'' • � ..«�.�. " . �+ � i. „ ,,,:� e� �ii _ <• �T • . • . '•.�. '�r � t � I ; Y. ' , % � J�` . • . • • • e� ` a ♦ '�: � t 3 f� � �, _ _.•� `� � '� � y� • � • y '- •� �+ � � • • • 4 • � � _ __ 4V� • � � — ' �u } ,• ♦ • YfMODT4 {1fYfM74R � f � � S • � � • SU - 5]U i t � • � ! SC��OOt I PIMlK1 • � � ..' { • � av � • ,_,.�. � ' • O � • I / � • • • w • �% �♦ • • • • , � �(\ J'�� • • \ + R � � , j��J/� V/il ; l t � . pKlE • 1� • { \�Y <�[ 'C/ �\ �� \ . • _ ` � • . • � w ` / � • � � @ � � � o� ~ • � • . _. • � • • .• �_ 1.. . � � • • l � j � �� Q `� � • 7 t � ) i _ � „ � • • i . � vinu«r.� � � � ,t •. , • �� pq ' - .� • / ` �p1 • • � �t^ • O � 'f-- . f • � � •l•�� .s: ,�1 � l `�Ty ' ' . , , . �(ALL � ;� / A " . I+i 1 �� / CT� : c c� � 1 � � srraGOcv �• — f � • � • • � � _ (� l ( .i. �-• 1 . . . � ---- I . . � � � � � i «so • �c� „ � _ � • - - �'�,T.1� �� .—� _ ��'_ �� S T A E H I G W A Y � �� , � • ,I m �__i ,� � - . SUBJECT PROPERTY i! z ''� � T . � GOLF COURSE 9 CO4UNTRY CLUE � ' I w � p� I � � . � + • � + NORTH � ( PRIVATE ) , L � , � � . ' ' SCALE 1"=800' 'a �- !.� � • . Z , rJ �' . . . . u i � , V a N RE P NTE ORIV � " ' ' • '_ _ �\ • :i� • � � • ' il 'Y�'/ �� i * • . � � - i� � _ � /^�+� � + • ��.+ _ { ��_�� ••:..:.: : �. p. ! `eL� t j � �st"Y1."'......•� . zJ' � \ / • • � '^�_-f'1+....... • /J � �\.1J ' • • � � ' ' ��n � � � � � � •~.' • �i t ' _ - • N . . �.. • ` • — � =.. _ • � �. '. . . . -- _ • _ � o � , — .a r � �J • � ' - — _ .-� . � / r / . -_. � � �c��a� �� i . . /IlJ � _ - '` � pPRK �� . � � . .�. . . ' ____. . 3041 � ��4ee! S� �b 4��. 6: �1,�` � l� uo 14 J i^• Q.• F,.:..�. ! - -- . 4 D�! - L - - � � r` � � g ..�� -�'&"� t i , � ,,.'�, ,,-s� _�s�-.. AVANT , � e�n- , .,- • . :r� ' -- -t-q, : � • s :. � r - , � , , 4 . r�`-.�� iW..� n€� � �' A=264°36'3a' > c j,:; . � n: . � � ( � 'S;�'.f:.: �� y. ��;, ?'I N kx0:�r. b[cz, 4i� (j .Bi.'..G N�f / Jv,csr,: t� . 362ai ; Yi.S9 t�<, ; v> :^� �s zb .�� rc ea 3e � c. � 3� C. . .� ix.�+c " I2 D''��E,4 A '• N.fi9°4i cC-i-��l�7:P /CQ,=B � „y 15 Z71`�� ,�,,;�1 � D M 3� „ � � G: �a �'� �,� �,1�'��.'%��' i);V ' � � � �3 � �� P 2 3 � ' ; 8 ' .Q "'�_' G�� 4�4o pg opZ 2�/" ?��.. v �r ' �E - X •� � - �j m �... : t24.00 � Ft..s& ^ n�.z0 wt:.�:. �iS.LG Y S: jG �sr,a t3 c�:QY � 13G5Q S. 4t'fi.�80.80 �}ftE yG � o �o..� _ , � w��sr ,- • ,_ - � ,, na:a`o �o�.ty � .oi ;� .. , iT c{y!` m �, ,o- ♦♦ _N,89� ilAI��N� 4c a 3.a �; 3 � �: J N (� � � � y � 0 150 CO � 60 _� R"q <ip 5 i:o 26 �o;. Z, :�f' �5 �- 1� � ��:. _. ,�� j.m.� m.Q m . r. e,� �� N r� ,+` ��►� �j IR 2'Q �ip W ss �o' �* �_. ti� V . 1,�.r: .. li �ir.o3 t1.8 !'lb�'w '�<��" .�' , H ,+4G:�>,, , t :: n � 3838 � .:•20�:595.'. <�°"�,M'°a Ri . �•.' t07.�5 {G7 iP, : �9 ,! �•� ---- UTL4T A 2093r, a� , a. R_. � ,6�zs ,1, � ��STR��RD °R0.9r ° 'r I�i w� p� � � I ' � oNs t'i61v,,,,o,�,� .! � 6�'�:� i c. 237.04 q-s • ��S P �: P '" � ` 1 y'�e� o N . .....:�$7.40 � i40.07 80.00 � =Y. o �a ,a` -� \ �� ' iii �0 ' � � �N.B�I�I��W N 9$�9�'C'�. � �'n-i�gpi ' �,a ,r �' 32.0 �_ 4b.oM-- ;n �� 13'r S2 �' o c '�};o � o�o ".�3,3� St �i� � 30;30 � o a � `� o i Z M'�m w�� ,a'n� � Qio 2 o�n 3 T�cs+c 4 �'. � a •�tjj P{ G� N� �?'�•s ''� 'n!a b'- R . ( � 7 � �fl anp� . .. � �`_ P+ � ^ m � j '" �' , � �`'_ . � . 40 a 60 92 P,'s `^ t00.04 N tl`w GO � �'.., r,7� . ' « °D- - . .. � ( , ZO 7 4 G� Z o.� �s 43.c3 � -7 t73.Li v . ' CIRCLE � u w //d/ � :; f� � W; N � �URT �o,,o -t � o , � . `� 3 �� Z�C CJ ia %' r' p, a �� 9 ' �,5 ,; 91.iB . � r u - �sa .. . � t � . 3 3 ii :. tt �' � -�, «,.oe 8 � ^' � y i � 3 � � �,a � � � � � 03iJ-26 Q � .____ + � ��f � a 'g' ��.o,� - 8 t• p� �o -� _ . ,.�. t Z ,-,S.�a ♦ ,( . _ � y f o � \ i Q Q 4 � v d d r/ � o � jj Vi = �-, " ' � •'"•1 `� �.` . {-�{� . � _ .� { , S' 10 'y0 IS).00 �_� `� ( - 4 . � � v �9.3b ,".:. � �^ • � 28.LS � � h � , , J 5,9 �-��4 a � g � 1` . . � ro' ` i4o.'tL ��/r Pr, � v � "' � t V' _:' : t } �J 1 � � j> 1' l, I � � � � I 2 a� � .+ ,� •l b Z o 7 r �<._ � ! ; '� � � ' � � �� °9,$ j� _ _ _ s ... ,� .n wo ^,,;�,J �� U` lCHAEL D. DuPQNT � Q a. � m !� 73 �z �l'r 5 Q nQ.� FlRST ADD1TtON � J Z�� 3 � �4 �e �' t l! �e �� _ i '� t a +' . :.7.00r 1G5.44 4100 �7 � a o a �, S �.,�-. tsR.as g jp7 �as.ao so . c 1 3 " ° 4 o re �51+' b�` W _ 42::'t ' -i N6 3'04 E. �60.D _. _ _ .` -� ^ - Q K� SO..rd 4. 3 � A„' i.f � 1+� a .Jl� � 1 � � co��y C�6 �7`�� b p'�$ q � ,y, � �� ,Q Y z .y � - 'Q "F ! %� � •.� � z J � O 012- 30 � °s,°�'.�t 79 tas.aa � � Q Ne�,z�� VlGTORIA H$�OI�f�Tn � . z� � �Z < � �r � s0(%�.� H B9°I6' id'E � � q t6 80.42 Ip3.08 � � ; m 5 � 69.Q2 �� a _ � r - H w ,}ti. a�6G'�t0��, Oa �'gM r 'r r. l� � J�" t� r � `x ,7�'fl'? � � A 7 = a a � ,t,� e�+ � = r Q° v T 1�s�� ' 60.70 i00.34 � � =x ��jp E iO3.24 ~ 1 j 030- 3 L h gs• gz w�.�a ::�ro{z�::;:: ta.7s � vs * / 7 Gyl�yd if% `� � ga�u�' , � �? ::�: � ::�;: 2�: o L.--' ! a / � �c Q .ae ic;::;'::%; . ,o �,,,, • � L%�Tc:%�i"�l% � ,Q, I 2 N m I 1 b':r:,$,Q:::�i:y • F 9 � `�,,, � !t 6'� f?c. 040-30 ,� � ,^; M :�'r:::;: ` bta7 N -- a (2404>7-B, " z � ; ;•.'=�::' _ � �,, ... ZG �+GB� � � 43.69 i8t.76 �;•`$'�?L'+•�'•.�:' bt.76 !� � . � /�d'S 2O0 H96r33'iB��E. 461. "'� /T"�' /32 4 �SUBJEGT PRt�PERTY �NCIRTN T - - - - - SCAL.E � "=200' - - -i , ,�,,.2 or-y`h�r-ra N�i`ur� G�s G`o. (2'G "�Li.��'� a-- - - -- - - _ ._ _. � _ _ ._ _ _ � ! t • . s�e��c� eo,w • 1 � � C ! i � + � � ( { .n � h ,-, . � '. MEMo June 25, 1990 T4: Tim Mallay FROM: Klayton Eckles SU&TECT: Front yard setback variance i am trying ta build an Iat 10 of Michael D. Dupont's 1st Addition. Hawever, there is an exi�ting hame on lot 11 which has a 57' setback which makes i� very difficult to pasition the house on my lot. If I build to the 57' setback than everything but my garage will be 22 feet behind the adjacent hou�e. Also I will have virtually no back yard. On a lot with frantage on a trunk highway, a back yard is very important and valuable. My proposal is to set the house so that everything but the garage meets the 57' setback. This would put the garage at a setback af 35'. Also, I can position the house in such a way so that �he garage is farthest �rom lot 11. Given that there are many lats alang this stretch of Victaria Road which are in frant of this lot (se�backs ranging from 10' to 44'), I made the mistake of assuming I could buzld up to the 30' setback. Now I am in a very difficult �ituation because 2 intended occupy the site befare September 15�h, and planned ta comn�ence canstruction before July 1st. Attached is a drawing showing the proposed and existing setbacks. Please respond as soon as pa�sible. 1Viendota . ity o� Heiglits APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. �'I a"' Date of Ap lication Lp I- D Fee Paid �� ay-14 �n Applicant Name: �GKl.ES K LAYt�� PH: i g3 - i4 ZI (I.ast) (F'ust) (NII) Address: �� ✓1�..��<.G� r� lJ�' ��lvAi� �l1� SS � ZZ (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) Owner Name: � �YVI � (Last) (F'ust) (M� Address: (Number & Street) ' (City) (State) (Zip) Street Location of Property in Quesrion: 2 00'S �j ��nq, �d � Legal Description of Properiy: l.� �� LK � %ry11 GI�A�I- � �Uj�a1�'c� Type of Request: Rezoning Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Plan Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable Ciry Ordinance Number �CVariance Present Zoning of Property ��... Present Use V�G }�l�"i ' , Proposed Zoning of Properry :�� Proposed Use S� Suhdivision Approval Wedands Permit Other (attach explanation) Section I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. � — s�� _ .. rd� (Signature of Applicant) �( 6��a c� � (Received by - Tide) 1101 Victori�a Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 18v0 u � hav�c� Se�n -i'1.� p�� h�s�, ��,��-�� 1�� l o �� 1 � l� i �lx��l D .i� �p�s ��.�1/ , �� o� � �4 �- nv D�'�e�-�iaws -{'v �, s� Co e�se� 3�' S�e.'�ba��. � I have seen the proposed house Michael D. Dupont's Addition, proposed setback of 35'. �0� ��YL�.L�v'1�_!1� ------------------------ ------------------------ location for lot 10 block 1 and have no objection to the i 1 �r ` v �. t� , � � Q`` `� . � _ � � I . cl . . . ..�.....� � � , . ..� .� . � � .� 2 i c3 � � �.. � . 4� . - � � . _ . � � - ,.;; " � � � i ••- --- -----. ,. ._.. . � � . ; •-- .T- _ .. ...., . � .. "� ' '. �....."'�"" .�: � "' � � a . ..,.:. � Z I . . . . �Vt�T'O�RYtA � Gi�}��T . ,,. , � _ _ ' �s s� . . � i• �••�:. , S � ' � �f f : .. • . � � �`, •sr : . � �...�. --___.� � - � � : .. . • ` � T •� ,` . • i � • •�~ti i 3• � �s •�+ t • �� s� � a ��. • � : •'• : � j , • •�• ��• � NYr:ln' � . C } ' , � ' t i *s � �� • r �r . , ; • * . .• 9 . . ' a �, . �� i!� ��s �t �+ �'' - � �I'! _ �� ;s• ��• ��t . . . *�• �� • •� � ( , � • • �+� y • -�• . . . .. . � •• • � ; ' � �`.,r ' �� . � • � �� • i + � --._ ,. S • , ' a �7� 30 �4� •ti �4 � � � 3 c.� :� ,.� ' . ,,. �0 �� !/ /u.� /b � /or� i` ___ _-_,-_ � -- _ 3�j_ _ __ _ _ . ,. _ _ _ • . _ . . .�----.. �% �1'c�CY�/ .E'nc.d o�' :�toa o �Z-CdeaiA tl�R�1 `� � -Iotv�A S CERTI FICATE OF SURVEY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 10. BLOCK I. MICHAEL D. DUPONT FIRST ADDITION� DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA � (JL7r0) DENOTE EXISTING ELEVATION (92C0) DENOTE PROPOSED ELEVATION N. 86• 33 � 48" E. �.,..ti.. „ N. �•33 48 E. C VICTORIA ROAD C ity o�� -�� .�,, �, � 1Viendota . Heiglits June 29, 1990 Mr. Klayton Eckles 4680 Ridgecliff Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Eckles: ., • Your application for a �% Q� �u� �` will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, � v l.y �O , ��j Qo The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. The Planning Commission recommended c3. p.� �va..( o'F �c� v2S �`e. � �r,�.r �c`4� c� • If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, �� Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb 1101 Victoria Curve •1Viendota Heights, 1VIN - 55118 452•1850 June 22, 1990 Mr. Rlayton Eckles 4680 Ridgecliff Drive Eagan, MN 55122 C ity o� � � � - 1Viendota._� Heiglits Dear Mr. Eckles: Your application for a V��a�t��-2 will be considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, u``� � V up � The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative shouid plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, • �� C� 3 Kevin Batchelder - Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb 0 .=�z'^ •� 1101 Victoria Curve •1Viendota Heights;' 1ViN • 55118 -'452-1850 �°�� '� LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY GITY COUNCIL JULY 10, 1990 General Contractors Licenses Bjorklund Const. Co., Tnc. Great scape�, Inc. Hoyt Construction Independent Fire Protection, Inc. J.W. Hulme Co. John S . iiandyman New Mech Co. Sawhorse, Inc. Sunshine Realty, Inc. Twin City Design, Inc.� Conarete Licenses Cast-Con, Inc. Poured Concrete Foundations, Inc. � HeatinQ & Air Canditioning Licenses Bloomington Heating & A/C, Inc. Dependable Heating & AfC, Inc. Northland Mechanical Cont., Inc. United Sheet Metal Gas Piping Licenses Dependab3e Heating & AJC, Inc. Metro Gas Installer�, Inc. Wenzel Htg. & A/C Excavating License Schield Construction Co. : r Mendota Heights Police Department Memorandum June 26, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council, City Admin��or FROM: Dennis J. Delmont, Chief of Police ��i� SUBJECT: Evergreen Knolls Speeding Survev The Mayor and City Administrator received a letter from Mr. Larry Rudolph, 741 Evergreen Knolls on June 11, 1990, requesting a traffic survey be done on Evergreen Knolls. That survey has been completed. :_ • Mr. Rudolph's concerns evolve around his street being used by "non-residents", and becoming a"mini Indy 500". He asserts that cars are constantly racing through with a total disregard for the speed limit. He also mentions children playing in the street, and in a•driveway that is particular susceptible because of a curve in the roadway. Mr. Rudolph requests, if the survey warrants some action, that: #1 - A stop sign be placed in one of the two cul-de-sacs to stop Evergreen Knolls and deter people from using it as a through-way. #2 - A"caution, children at play" sign with a reduced speed limit, be placed somewhere. As you can see by the attached data, our monitoring of the traffic on Evergreen Knolls does not indicate excessive volume of traffic, or excessive speed. As a matter of fact, of all the streets that we have surveyed in the past year, Evergreen Knolls has the lowest volume and the lowest average speed of any of them. I can understand the neighbors concern because of the curving nature of the street, however, that curving nature is also what is keeping the speed down to very acceptable levels. I would note that we watched carefully for pedestrian traffic and children playing in the street. And, although there were a few people moving about, that was not excessive either. Of note in the neighborhood was the fact that children do, in fact, cross the street without looking and several were observed putting themselves in peril by running back and forth across the street, and not paying any attention to the possibility of traffic. Also noted was the fact that seven homes on Evergreen Knolls left their garage doors open with no one present in the yard or the garage. — .�s�—�.. ., I cannot recommend stop signs on Evergreen Knolls. In fact, if any stop signs were to be considered they would be to stop the cul-de-sac streets at Evergreen Knolls, rather than Evergreen Knolls at the cul-de-sac streets. Our policy in the past has been for the neighborhood to consult with the Engineering Department on "children at play" signs, and then absorb the cost of any of those signs. I would recommend that'the residents of the neighborhood work with their children to teach them proper traffic safety rules and if, in fact, a driveway situated on a blind curve is a gathering place for children, then possibly the parents should convince the children to play elsewhere. . � -.�. -. I don't believe any action is required on the request by Mr. Rudolph. DJD:cb - 2 - {• . Evergreen Knoil TIME LIC DIRECTION SPEED 6/25/90 9:40 AM 678ENA E 2 2 9:42 AM PM6410 . E 24 9:45 AM 451DUK W 28 9:46 AM RCM005 W 2 8 Avera e S eed 9:46 AM 1236TR E 27 24 9:47 AM 394ENN E 3 0 9:56 AM UNK BMW W 1 8 9:59 AM SCOOTER W 1 2 9:59 AM 205EGX E 2 9 10:00 AM 951 DGR E 2 5 10:03 AM 281 CQR E 1 9 10:04 AM 1236TR E 24 6/26/90 3:11 PM 727CM1 W 27 3:12 PM 3:14 PM Avera e S eed 3:15 PM 6 22 3:18 PM NBR750 E 23 3:18 PM 174EMY E 22 3:24 PM 391 BMH E 3� 3:25 PM 394ENN E 23 6/28/90 4:44 PM 571 BBE E 22 4:45 PM 643DCH E 24 4:46 PM ? W 2 7 4:48 PM MZW927 E 25 4:48 PM ? E 25 4:51 PM 108CYY W 3 4 Average Speed 4:51 PM GA8936 W 23 25 4:53 PM RLX412 E 2 6 4:56 PM 811 AEC , E 2 7 5:00 PM ? E 21 5:00 PM NO PLATE E 2 2 5:02 PM 419CUH W 3 9 5:04 PM 016AWC W 2 8 5:05 PM 384EKM W 2 9 5:06 PM 108CYY E � 22 5:07 PM CWJ018 W 17 5:09 PM 203DNA E 22 5:10 PM ERW444 E 2 6 5:12 PM 531AGP E 29 5:12 PM ? E 28 5:14 PM 021 ENT E 21 5:15 PM SQUAD CAR W 24 6/29/90 9:20 AM .-� �� `3 - � �� .� � �� .�.� � w .�.� -�� . - �,� . ..�� o� � .�� ...�-- �,,,,�,�.� � O �!v.� j� a-.�`� �.a� �,�.,.� S�-O.w �� c� .�°"',^"" ✓V�" , .�%-�. �� . June 11,1990 Honorable Charles Metensotto 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Hgts., Mn. 55118 Dear Mayor Metensotto. I spoke to Tom Lawell on Monday June 4. 1990. He suggested I write you, so that a traffic survey may be done on Evergreen Knolls. As a representative of many concerned parents of Evergreen Knolls, we urge you to take notice and help remedy a potentially dangerous situation. Since moving to Mendota Hgts., we have noticed that the traffic on Evergreen Knolls has increased tremendously, and speed limits not being observed. Non residents are using Evergreen Knolls to avoid the four way stop at the intersection of Wentworth and Dodd Rd. T'he street has hecome a" Mini Indy 500 ". Cars are constantly racing thru, with total disregard for the speed limit. If this keeps up, we feel that a tragedy is inevitable. Our neighborhood has an abundance of children ranging from the ages of 7 months to 12 years old. We as parents try to keep the children out of the street due to the traffic problem. However, the children cannot be under constant adult supervision, and they have a tendency to be found playing in the street, or shooting down driveways and not stopping in time and ending up in the street. Evergreen Knolls has some curves and a driveway with a blind approach, that is used a great deal by the children. A driver not familiar with the street, and speeding, could very easily either seriously in�ure or kill a child. : �. We as a neighborhood would like the city to conduct a traffic survey. If the survey warrants some action, we would like two things done. 1. A stop sign placed at either one of the two cul-de- sacs, to deter people from using it as a thru way. 2. A caution children at play sign with a reduced speed limit. I am looking forward to hearing from you in the very near future in regards to this matter. Sincerely, ��s V�.�.��;�„� Larry S. Rudolph 741 Evergreen Knolls Mendota Hgts., Mn.55118 cc: Tom Lawell CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 5, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis r� SIIBJECT: Completion of Probationary Period - Kim Blaeser INTRODIICTION On July 1, 1990 Kim Blaeser celebrated her one year anniversary as Senior Secretary. Having completed the required one year probationary period, it is now appropriate to consider her permanent appointment to the position. HISTORY Kim was promoted to the Senior Secretary position on July 1, 1989 having previously served as Secretary, and prior to that as Clerk/Receptionist. Kim has been employed at City Hall for over seven years. niscussioN Kim has been of great assistance to me over the past six months. Not only has she done an exemplary job with day-to-day support activities, she also has served as a valuable staff inember in helping me become acclimated to Mendota Heights. Kim has shown a continued interest in improving her clerical skills and has sought out other areas of professional growth as well. One of Kim's other prime responsibilities is serving as the secretary to the Planning Commission. As such, she assists Jim and Kevin in the monthly preparation of Planning Commission packet materials, and coordinates the tangled reality of mailed public hearing notices, newspaper publications and meeting scheduling which accompanies the planning process. Kim excels at this type of work and has proven herself a capable team player,. As Senior Secretary, Kim is also involved in many activities which cross departmental lines. In her position it is expected that she interact and communicate with Councilmembers, staff and the general public in a competent and helpful manner. I appreciate Kim's positive attitude and approach towards this responsibility. RECOMMENDATION I whole heartedly recommend Kim Blaeser for permanent appointment to the position of Senior Secretary having successfully completed the required one year probationary period. Along with this appointment, Kim should be considered for advancement in the salary matrix from Step D to Step E effective July 1, 1990. Step E is the final Step in our current matrix, and is equivalent to an annual salary of $25,831. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with the above recommendation it should pass a motion giving Kim Blaeser permanent employment status as Senior Secretary and approving Kim's salary advancement to Step E. MTL:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 27, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council, City Admini r FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Completion of Probationary Period, Nancy Bauer INTRODUCTION Nancy Bauer was promoted to Secretary (Utility Billing Clerk) effective on July 1, 1989. She will complete her one year probation in the position on June 30th. The purpose of this memo is to recommend Nancy's permanent appointment. INFORMATION During the past year, Nancy has learned and performed her utility billing responsibilities very well. Both billings and receipting are done in a timely manner, and she has been consistently responsive and pleasant to the utility customers. In addition to these responsibilities, she has well performed secretarial work as needed for the Fire Marshal, Code Enforcement Officers and me. She has also provided secretarial support for the City Administrator when requested. Throughout her tenure with the City, I have received many unsolicited compliments on Nancy's work and attitude from staff members to whom she provides support and from members of the public. As an example, Fire Marshal Paul Kaiser has recently written me a letter for Nancy's personnel file commending her for assistance she has given him. Nancy is a conscientious and hardworking employee, always willing to be of assistance and to accept new challenges. I am most pleased to have her as a member of my staff. RECOMMENDATION I recommend without reservation or hesitation that Nancy Bauer be given permanent status as Secretary (Utility Billing Clerk), effective July 1, 1990. Nancy is currently at Step C of the salary matrix, and is not scheduled to receive a salary increase in conjunction with permanent appointment. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass a motion giving Nancy Bauer permanent employment status as Secretary. 0 �� MEMO Date: 6-27-90 T0: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Building Activity Report for June 1990 CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE 90 YEAR TO DATE 89 BUILDING � � PERMITS: No. �laluation Fee Collected � No. Valuation Fee Collected � No. Vatuation Fee Collected � � SfD 3 454,445.00 4,066.43 � 33 5,506,157.00 47,068.15 � 40 6,319,425.00 55,811.05 APT 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 � 0 0 ' 0 TOWNHWSE 0 0 0 � 5 638,665.00 6,023.34 � 15 1,640,695.00 13,174 25 CONDO 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 � 7 1,500,000.00 7,490.18 MISC. 38 342,170.00 5,538.46 � 117 960,552.00 16,611.69 � 102 836,461.00 15,530.02 C/1 4 33,000.00 534.90 � 15 407,574.00 4,390.33 � 18 1,680,008.00 12,680.38 -------------------------------------------+------------------------------------+-----------•-----------...---------- Sub Total 45 829,615.00 10,139.79 � 170 7,512,948.00 74,093.51 � 182 11,976,589.00 104,685.88 TRADE ' � � PERMITS- � � � � Ptunbing 8 316.00 � 55 2,196.00 � 71 1,937.00 Water 7 35.00 � 40 200.00 � 67 335.00 Sewer 7 122.50 � 40 700.00 � 51 892.50 Heat, AC, � � & Gas 16 885.50 � 75 4,514 35 � 86 8,748.50 -------------------------------------------+------------------------------------+---------------•-------------------- Sub Total 38 1,359.00 � 210 7,610.35 � 275 11,913.00 � � ( � " Licensinq• � � � � Cont ractoN s � � Licenses 31 775.00 � 338 8,450.00 � 375 9,375.00 -------------------------------------------+------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Total 114 829,615.00 12,273.79 � 718 7,512,948.00 90,i53.86 � 832 11,976,589.00 125,973.88 NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Nac, and State Surcharge. Amounts shoun will reflect anly permit, ptan check fee, and valuation amounts. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 5, 1990 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admi i ri�.t FROM: Klayton H. Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets Mendota Woods (Patrick) Job No. 8922 . Improvement No. 89, Project No. 7 DISCUSSION: Staff has completed the preparation of plans and specifications for the above project. A copy of the plans and specifications will be available at the meeting for review. The next step is to advertise for bids. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that Council approve the plans and specification and authorize advertisement for bids. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with the staff recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 90- , RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE MENDOTA WOODS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 7) . KHE:dfw � Gity of Mendota Heights Dakota Caunty, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 90- RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS TO SERVE MENDOTA WOODS (IMPROVEMENT Na. 89, PROJECT SPECIFICATI�NS FOR IMPR�VEMENTS NO. 7) WHEREAS, the City Engineer reported that the propo�ed improvements and canstructian thereof were feasible and desirable and further reported on the proposed cost� of said improvements and construction thereaf; and WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore directed that the City Engi- neer proaeed with the preparation of pians and specifications thereof; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for said i�pravements and has presentgd such plans and specifications to �he City Council for approval. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the Ci.ty o� Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the plans and specificati,ons for said improvements be and they are hereby in al1 respects appravad. 2. That the City Clerk with �he aid and assistance of the City Engineer be and is hereby authorized and directed to adver- tise far bids for said improvements all in accordance with the appliaable Minnesota Statutes, such bids ta be received at the City Hall af the City of Mendota Heights by 10:00 a'clock A.M., 2'hursdag, August 2, i990, at which time they wi11 be publicly apened in the City Council Chambers of the City iiall by the City Engineer will then tabulated, and will then be considered by the City Cauncil at its next regular Counci3 meeting. Adopted by the City Council of the Gity of Mendata Heights this 10th day of July, 1990. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HETGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk DRAFT CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 26, 1990 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, June 26, 1990, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve. ;Chairperson Morson called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock�P.M. The following members were present: Morson, Dwyer, Krebsbach, Duggan, Dreelan and Tilsen. Commissioner Koll was excused. Also present were Public Works Director Jim Danielson, Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder, Planning Consultant Phil Carlson and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser. APPROVAL OF Commissioner MINUTES 1990 Minutes. Commissioner AYES: 5 . NAYS: 0 ABSTAIN: Dreelan ` Duggan moved to approve the May 22, Dwyer seconded the motion. CASE NO. 90-22 Mr. Klayton Eckles was present to discuss his ECKLES request for a twenty-two foot (22') front yard variance to construct a new home at 2005 Victoria Road. Mr. Eckles explained that the home immediately to the west of his land is an older ' home that was the original home on the subdivision and is setback fifty-seven feet (57') from the property,line. Mr. Eckles also stated that he has received signatures of consent from neighbors to the east and west of his property. Commissioner Tilsen moved to recommend to the City Council that they approve a twenty-two foot (22') front yard variance. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 HEARING Mr. Gerald Frisch, 960 Caren Road, was present to CASE NO. 90-18 discuss his request for a conditional use permit: FRISCH - Mr. Frisch explained that in 1980, he received a CUP conditional use permit to construct a pool and pool house in his rear yard. Mr. Frisch explained that the City Council agreed to allow him to install landscaping around the pool in lieu of fencing. Mr. Frisch stated that Dakota County permitted him to encroach on their right-of-way by installing the landscaping. Mr. Frisch stated that he has talked to James Backstrom, County Attorney, and they are presently working out an agreement to get permission to install the fence on the County right-of-way and at such time that Victoria Road is improved, the fence would have to be removed off the right-of-way at his own expense. Mr. Frisch stated that he does not feel that there is a problem since he is working on an agreement with the County. Mr. Frisch stated that he thought that he had permission to install the fence when he received the original conditional use permit and that is why he has already installed the fence posts. In response to a question from Chairperson Morson, Mr. Frisch explained that Mr. Hess lives to the south of the common property line and that there is a chain link fence along Mr. Hess's property line and that his fence would juncture with Mr. Hess's. He explained that the proposed fence would run parallel with Victoria Road inside the existing landscaping. In response to a question from Chairperson Morson, Mr. Frisch stated that the fence would be in the County right-of-way. Mr. Frisch explained again that the fence would be separated from the road by a mature hedge. Chairperson Morson questioned if the County gave Mr. Frisch permission to install the hedge and Mr. Frisch answered yes. Commissioner Duggan questioned Mr. Frisch is he had any documentation stating the agreement between Mr. Frisch and Dakota County regarding the landscaping. Mr. Frisch stated that the County had no objections as long as the hedge is not permanent. Mr. Frisch stated that he will be receiving a letter from the County. Public Works Director Danielson briefly explained that Victoria Road will be turned back to the City from the County and that in anticipation of that, the City had designated Victoria Road as an M.S.A. road. Commissioner Dreelan questioned if the fence could be moved in so that it is not in the right-of-way. Mr. Frisch stated that he would like to leave the fence where it is proposed and that he does not feel that the fence would be detrimental to the neighborhood. He further stated that he finds this whole procedure burdensome. Chairperson Morson then opened the meeting for 0 AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 public comments. Commissioner Dwyer formally accepted a letter submitted by Mr. Hess, neighbor of Mr. Frisch, stating that he has no problem with the:fence installation if it is not installed along the border of his property located at 1645 South Lexington. Mr. Christian, Lilac Lane, stated that he has no problem with the fence. Mr. Don Lewis, lives across the street from Mr. Frisch, questioned if the fence will be behind the hedge. Mr. Frisch answered that it would be. Mr. Lewis stated that he has no problem with the fence. Ms. Anita Stockton, 969 Caren Road, stated that she has no objections to the proposed fence. Commissioner Duggan stated that the drawing submitted to the Planning Commission shows that the proposed fence will be constructed on Mr. Frisch's property line. Mr. Frisch stated that the plan is incorrect. ' Commissioner Dwyer moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Koll seconded the motion. Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend to the City Council that they approve a conditional use permit to construct a fence inside the maple hedge conditioned upon: 1. Mr. Frisch provide the City Council with a written agreement from Dakota County approving the construction. 2. That a survey be submitted showing the proposed fence location and existing facilities accurately. 3. That Mr. Frisch agree to remove the landscaping and fencing at no cost to County or City at such time as the City of County improves the roadway. 4. That the existing hedge be maintained. Commissioner Dwyer seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 1, Morson HEARING Mr. Craig Anderson, representing Delta CASE NO. 90-19 Environmental Consultants, was present to discuss DELTA ENVIRON. their request for an accessory structure in a B-2 CONSULTANTS Zone to be constructed at the Amoco station located at 2030 Dodd Road. He explained that the accessory structure CUP is being proposed as part of a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency treatment system to clean up the site due to gas leakage from the old underground storage tanks. Mr. Anderson explained that the accessory structure would house a recovery well to pump and treat groundwater, remove the gas and discharge the waste into the sanitary sewer system. Mr. Anderson stated that the system could be running for three to five years. Commissioner Duggan stated his concerns with the unusual noise and vibrations caused by the system pumping. Mr. Anderson stated that they are estimating to pump one gallon per minute. , In response to a question from Commissioner Dreelan, Mr. Anderson stated that the decision to dismantle the accessory structure would have to be made by the owner of the station. Commissioner Duggan stated his concerns with the emission of fumes. Mr. Anderson stated that that area is regulated by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and that everything they do will be in compliance with their regulations. Mr. Anderson stated that there are annual testings done on the equipment. He stated that they would report to the City on the sewer discharge and that they could include the annual testings with the report on the sewer discharge. - In response to a question from Commission Tilsen, Mr. Anderson stated that once the contamination is below the MPCA standards the wells and pump would be abandoned according to the Department of Health standards. Commissioner Dreelan questioned where the structure will be placed on the land. Mr. Anderson stated that they will be meet the City requirements on setbacks. Commissioner Krebsbach questioned how the creek, near McDonald's, will be affected. Mr. Anderson stated that he is not sure what the completed depth of the well will be. He explained AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 HEARING CASE NO. SJOHOLM CUP that the reason why they are installing this system is so that they do not impact the creek. Commissioner Dwyer questioned if Delta Environmental Consultants could provide the City with a Certificate of Insurance showing proof of insurance. Mr. Anderson stated that they would. Chairperson Morson then opened the meeting to the public. There was no one present to discuss this matter. . Commissioner Dwyer moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. Commissioner Tilsen moved to recommend to the City Council that they approve the conditional use permit conditioned upon: 1. 2. 3. That the structure meet the setback requirements. That the building be used only for pumping for the treatment of ground water. That the building be removed after the treatment is completed. Commissioner Dwyer offered a friendly amendment stating the Delta Environmental Consultants submit to the City a Certificate of Insurance. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. Mr. and Mrs. Jack Sjoholm, 1161 Delaware Avenue, 90-20 were present discuss their request for a conditional use permit to construct a six foot (6') solid board fence along their property line abutting Wentworth Avenue to provide screening and abatement of traffic noise. Mrs. Sjoholm explained that they have modified the plans from the original design and that the Commission should review the plans showing a pencil line indicating the location of the fence. She stated that they are now seeking approval for the fence location furthest from Wentworth Avenue. Mrs. Sjoholm explained that the fence line meanders through existing trees and is forty-three feet (43') from the centerline at its closet location and forty-eight feet (48') at the furthest location. She stated that they want to save as many trees and vegetation as possible. Mrs. Sjoholm submitted pictures for the Planning Commission to review. After a brief discussion complimenting the Sjoholm's on their design, Chairperson Morson opened the meeting to the public. There was no one present to discuss this matter. Commissioner Duggan moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Krebsbach moved to recommend that the City Council grant a conditional use permit for a fence conditioned on: 1. That the fence be within the pine trees. 2. That the approval be for the penciled line on the site plan at a range of forty-three feet (43') to forty-eight feet (48') from the centerline of Wentworth Avenue. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 1, Morson ' - CASE NO. 90-21 Mr. Thomas Owens, Attorney, and Mr. Bruce Jones, BATESVILLE representing Batesville Casket Company, were CASKET COMPANY present to discuss a request for a lot split and LOT SPLIT two side yard variances in order to construct an AND VARIANCES office/warehouse on Northland Drive at Highway 55 on lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Northland Plaza. Mr. Owens briefly explained who owns the land and why Batesville Casket Company is looking to relocate their company. He explained that the facility will be constructed on Lot 4 and that Lot 3 would remain vacant for future development. Mr. Owens stated that Batesville Casket Company does not employ many people. He further explained that the impact on traffic will be minimal since there will be roughly 4 to 5 trucks per day. Mr. Owens briefly discussed the shared driveway concept and noted several advantages for the shared driveway. Mr. Owens explained that the driveway will run right along the new property boundary. Mr. Owens explained how maintenance costs would be shared. In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Mr. Owens stated that a driveway easement could be established to be sure that there is a sharing of maintenance costs, rebuilding costs and that each company maintain liability insurance, etc. Chairperson Morson stated that he has concerns for� the building being to crowded to the west and that a common driveway is a safety hazard. Mr. Bruce Jones presented revised drawings showing elevations and site sections. Mr. Jones briefly explained the grade change on Lot 3 and that it creates an accessibility problem. He explained that because of the grade change there is really no option but to have a shared driveway. Mr. Jones explained that Lot 4 is the preferable site for exposure and accessibility. He explained that Batesville Casket is requiring to have three docks and one drive in door. Mr. Jones e�lained that the docks would be along I-494 and that they would berm and screen the truck area. He stated that they would maintain aesthetically the driveway. In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Mr. Jones stated that they would create berms that could be four feet (4') high. He explained that the natural slope of the freeway cut is basically shielding the site. Mr. Jones stated that they would be happy to provide as much vegetation as possible to screen the wall. Commissioner Tilsen questioned how the trucks can back into the docks. Mr. Jones stated that they would have to pave part of their future driveway in to the adjacent site and that they would extend the driveway easement to have the best truck backing access. Commissioner Duggan questioned how essential future expansion is, Mr. Jones stated that it is the key part to their program. Commissioner Duggan stated that the concrete is not pleasing because the building is too large. Chairperson Morson stated that there is enough space available on the lot to preclude any variances. He stated that there is a safety concern on the east side of the building. He further stated that he is concerned with the trucks on the driveway in relation to the parking lot being so close to the driveway. Public Works Director Danielson stated that he sees no problem with the parking lot design. Chairperson Morson questioned if the building could moved further east. Mr. Jones stated that there is an NSP easement and severe grade problems that make a portion of Lot 3 unbuildable. Chairperson Morson stated that he agrees with the Planner that the building is too large for the property. Chairperson Morson stated that with respect to the variance requests there is no hardship. Mr. Jones briefly discussed the color schemes. He stated that they are planning natural colors with accent bands that are intermediate. There was a brief discussion regarding the Planning Commission's overall concern about the building being too large for the site. The Planning Commission further discussed their concerns relating to the parking along the shared entrance drive. Commissioner Dwyer moved to grant the lot split and the two variances according to the plans submitted and P-3 and P-4 as well as the landscape plans and line back up plans. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. AYES: 3 NAYS: 3, Krebsbach, Morson, Duggan Motion fails. Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that the City Council grant the lot division as requested Commissioner Dwyer seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that the City Council grant a side yard setback variance to allow a shared driveway for Lots 3 and 4 and twenty foot (20') side yard setback variance to allow a future building expansion along Trunk Highway 55. Commissioner Duggan further recommended that the Council should look at shifting the building to reduce the need for a variance. Commissioner Dwyer seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NAYS: 2, Krebsbach, Morson A brief recess was called at 10:05 o'clock P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 10:12 o'clock P.M. CASE NO. 90-03 Chairperson Morson stated that he would like to �.�,`.�.�� commend Commissioners Tilsen and Dwyer for the great deal of time they spent in the staff ineeting regarding the Phase II of Kensington. Chairperson Morson then turned the meeting over to Vice Chair Dwyer. . Mr. Dick Putnam, Tandem Corporation, reviewed the updated plans dated June 22, 1990. He explained the changes in the setback of the garages. He further explained that the buildings surrounding the park have been adjusted by using a sixteen unit building instead of two eight unit buildings. Mr. Putnam stated that they have reduced the ponding areas and that the recreational building has been moved. He explained that they have shifted buildings along the freeway to add more space. Mr. Putnam showed the Devonwood project in Bloomington in comparison of clustering which is much tighter in Bloomington than what is proposed in Mendota Heights. Mr. Putnam explained that there are no places where window e�osure and garages less than twenty feet (20') separation. Iie explained that it is mostly corner relationships that are less than standard. Mr. Putnam showed the revised bermings along Mendota Heights Road. He explained that the berms would be five to eight feet tall�. Commissioner Dwyer questioned the size of the mature trees that will be planted. Mr. Putnam stated that they would be four to six feet and that the pine trees could be twelve to twenty feet. In response to a question from Commissioner Dwyer, Mr. Putnam stated that the phasing of landscape begins when the homes are started and that the irrigation is installed first. He stated that sod may be last. Mr. Putnam reviewed the elevations of the berms along I-494. He explained that the berms would be eighteen feet. Mr. Putnam stated that you could see the top of garages and the second floor from the freeway. Mr. Putnam explained that the berms on the private road would be nine feet and that there would be plantings on top of the berms. Commissioner Duggan questioned where the state fence is located on the land, Mr. Putnam answered that it is 2/3 the way of the slope. Commissioner different grades of siding used in construction. Commissioner Duggan questioned the minimum distances and how many deviations there are between buildings and garages and parking to buildings. Mr. Putnam explained that many of the deviations are at a corner, porch, access point where there are no windows or views. Commissioner Dwyer briefly discussed the prohibition of long term rental. He stated that the City Attorney responded, using Attorney-Client privileged memorandum, that the City cannot restrict long term rental property. Commissioner Dwyer then asked if Kathleen Connolly, attorney representing the residents if she had any questions. Ms. Connolly questioned the setbacks along Owens Pond and wondered if there will be clarifications about decks and additions. She questioned a home that has forty feet setback. Mr. Putnam stated that the forty foot setback is on marsh area by the Beale's. Ms. Connolly stated that they will respond in writing to Planner Malloy's planning report. She stated that when she read Planner Malloy's report she wondered if he was employed by Centex Homes. Ms. Connolly stated that they disagree with the density calculations and that they disagree with the project deviations from Ordinance by PUD. Commissioner Tilsen stated that he is concerned with traffic relating to the park and questioned if Park Lane could be made a one way street. He further asked Public Works Director Danielson to briefly review the reasons why signal lights are not going to be installed at Dodd Road and Mendota Heights Road. Commissioner Krebsbach questioned if the square footage of the homes could be changed. Mr. Putnam stated that the buildings are very complex in design and that they just cannot be changed. He explained that a variety of unit types are proposed to meet the market demands. Commissioner Tilsen questioned the storage inside the units. Mr. Putnam stated that storage is measured in volume. Mr. Putnam stated that within the garages there is plenty of storage available. Commissioner Dwyer stated that there are a lot of legal issues to review and suggested that the Commission pass along this information to the City Attorney and the City Council. Commissioner Duggan questioned the amount of park acreage being contributed. Commissioner Duggan then questioned the financial solidity of Centex Corporation. Mr. Tom Boyce responded that Centex is publically held and that they are the second largest builder in the Country. Mr. Boyce stated that they will provide any figures requested. Mr. Boyce provided Commissioner Duggan with an annual report. Commissioner Duggan stated that he is against private roads. He further commented that the City does not have enough park land and that this is "our" last chance. Chairperson Morson moves in view of the request made by the City Council at their May meeting and the meetings held subsequent to that that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the rezoning, wetlands, preliminary plat and conditional use permit for planned unit development and that the consider Park Lane to be designated as a one way street. Commissioner Dwyer offered a friendly amendment that the Planning Commission is aware of the legal issues that have been raised by all parties and that the Planning Commission is not taking a position on it and that this recommendation is made conditioned upon review by the proper legal authority. Commissioner Tilsen seconded the motion. AYES: 3 NAYS: 3 Dreelan, Duggan, Krebsbach Motion fails. Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that the City Council deny the rezoning, wetlands, preliminary plat and conditional use permit for planned unit development as requested. Motion fails due to the lack of second. Commissioner Tilsen moved that the latest revised plans are an improved plan and that the public record gathered during the review of the Council's list of identified issues should be forwarded to the Council for their review. Commissioner Tilsen further added that the City Council consider making Park Lane a one way street designation. Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NAYS: 2, Morson, Duggan AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Chairperson Morson questioned-why his motion failed and Commissioner Krebsbach stated that she is still concerned with density. Commissioner Duggan stated that this request is in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and Commissioner Dreelan concurred. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that her concern is with the configurations of the units and that she had suggested that the housing should be spread out more. Chairperson Morson stated that he does not feel that the Planning Commission is doing its j ob . Commissioner Dwyer moved to adjourn the meeting at 12:31 o'clock P.M. Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion. Respectfully submitted, Kimberlee K. Blaeser Senior Secretary CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, June 19, 1990 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Anderson, Blesener and Hartmann. Councilmember Cummins had notified the Council that he would be late. AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Anderson moved adoption of the � revised agenda. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 Councilmember Cummins arrived at 7:35 o'clock P.M. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Anderson moved approval of the minutes of the May 1st regular meeting, the May 2nd Joint Council/Planning Commission Workshop and the June 5th adjourned minutes as corrected. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Anderson moved approval of the consent calendar for the meeting along with authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein. a. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the Park and Recreation Commission meetings held on May 8th and June 12th. b. Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's monthly report for May. c. Acknowledgment of the Fire Department monthly report for May. d. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-33, "RESOLUTION HOLDING THE STATE OF MINNESOTA .�= June 19, 1990 P age 2 HARMLESS FOR GRANTING THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS A VARIANCE", and authorizing the placement of 25 mph advisory signs on the "Caution Dangerous Intersection" signs. e. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-34, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 3", and Resolution No. 90-35, "RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR ALICE LANE SUBDIVISION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT 3". f. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-36, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. 4", Val's Addition. g. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-37, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT 6", and adoption of Resolution No. 90-38, "RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR NORTH IVY HILLS 2ND ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 8 8, PROJE C'I' NO . 6)". h. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-39, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT 5," and approval of Change Order No. 1 for Ruby Drive. i. Acceptance of quotes for installation of a sidewalk on the west side of the City Hall Building and award of a purchase order to M.F. Fleischhacker for their low bid of $480.00. j. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-40, "RESOLU'�ION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR BRIDGEVIEW SHORES 2ND ADDITION", and authorization for the Mayor and City Administrator to execute the Developer's Agreement. k. Approval of the List of Contractors dated June 19, 1990 and attached hereto. 1. Approval of the List of Claims dated June 13, 1990 and totalling $105,280.40. m. Approval of a sign permit for 790 South Plaza Drive (Bright Star Childrens Center) June 19, 1990 Page 3 Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 D.A.R.E. Mayor Mertensotto recognized the Drug Abuse RECOGNITION Resistance Education Program (D.A.R.E) which was conducted for the fifth grade students in Independent School District 197. Mayor Mertensotto stated that the success of the program was due to the cooperation received from the School District, the community and ' Officer Mario Reyes of the Mendota Heights Police Department. PUBLIC CONIl�lENTS Mr. Virgil McQuay, 976 Kay Avenue was present to discuss a petition submitted by the Victoria Road residents asking the City Council to consider eliminating the section of the City's pedestrian/bicycle trail system along Victoria Road. The City Council formally accepted the petition as submitted by the Victoria Road residents. Mayor Mertensotto explained that the City had made a formal request based on a request by the Victoria Road residents, to Mn/DOT to move the trail to the south side of Victoria Road which was denied by Mn/DOT. Mayor Mertensotto further explained that the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the plans again subsequent to the petition submitted by the Victoria Road residents, and that their recommendation continues to be in support of the construction of the trail. In response to a comment from Mr. McQuay, Public Works Director Danielson stated that the City is aware of the drainage in the area and that the City will be taking the drainage into consideration when the trail is constructed. Administrator Lawell explained that there was a separate trails subcommittee that spent a great deal of time looking at the proposed alignments for the trail way system. Administrator Lawell stated that one of the issues the subcommittee reviewed was that there is an elementary school on the north side of the street which the subcommittee felt was important to provide a pedestrian access to the school. He further stated that most of , June 19, 1990 Page 4 the pedestrian traffic does occur on the north side of the street. He further stated that this is a public improvement that is for the good of the entire community. Mr. Marty Evans, Victoria Road resident, stated his concerns for the drainage. He further commented that the City should be concerned with the individuals living on Victoria Road. He questioned if the City could install a grass pathway instead of a paved trail way. Mr. Evans questioned who owns the property along Victoria Road. Mayor Mertensotto responded that it is County right- of-way. Mayor Mertensotto further stated that paved trail ways are easier to maintain. Councilmember Blesener stated that the trail way is intended to be a dual purpose trail way. Councilmember Blesener questioned if there is a possibility of installing a bituminous curb where the City is having difficulty accommodating a ten foot shoulder plus the trail. Public Works Director Danielson stated that with curbs there are drainage problems. He further stated that it would elevate the trail another six inches. . Ms. Kathy Russwell, Victoria Road resident, questioned if there could be more exploration done in narrowing the trail way. She expressed her concerns with bicycles riding on the trail. She further questioned if the Council could explore more alternatives. Councilmember Blesener moved to proceed with the construction of the paved trail on the north side of Victoria Road with the engineering staff to explore the possibility of other alternative trail designs to include possible raised bituminous curb in areas where it may be appropriate. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Councilmember Anderson stated that he cannot support the motion as stated by Councilmember Blesener. He stated that there is a safety issue of keeping the trail away from a well traveled roadway. Councilmember Blesener amended her motion by deleting the portion directing the engineering staff to explore the possibility of other '': June 19, 1990 Page 5 alternative trail designs to include possible raised bituminous curb in areas where it may be appropriate. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Vote on Original Motion: AYES: 4 NAYS: 1, Anderson Vote�on Amended Motion AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 BID AWARD Council acknowledged a tabulation of bids received for the construction of the Sibley- Mendota Heights Athletic Complex. Council also acknowledged a memorandum from Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander regarding the status of the referendum budget. Treasurer Larry Shaughnessy informed the Council that there will be a resolution on the first bond sale for the park fund issues at the second meeting in July. The Council briefly discussed the estimated future needs for Kensington, Sibley and Mendakota Parks. Council also acknowledged that the preliminary estimates for the developments of the Kensington and Mendakota sites are significantly over budget and that in the coming months, it will be necessary for the Parks and Recreation Commission to re- evaluate priorities and funding options for the remainder of the improvements recommended by the Citizen's Park Review Committee. Councilmember Blesener expressed her concerns with the overall design of the Sibley Comfort Station with respect to the kitchen facility and the toilet facility. Parks Project Manager Kullander explained the reasons why the architects opted to use the materials designated for the concession stand counter and ceramic tile for the floors. He explained that they were looking for more durable materials and that maintenance was a factor considered. Administrator Lawell stated that the Code Enforcement Department would address the code areas relating to the materials and that if some modifications are needed, they June 19, 1990 Page 6 will be made. Councilmember Cummins moved to accept the bids for the construction of the Sibley-Mendota Heights Athletic Complex and to award the contract to GMH Asphalt Corporation for their low bid of $290,945.25 Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. AYE5: 5 NAYS: 0 UPDATE ON POLICE Council acknowledged a memorandum from Police OFFICER HIRING Chief Dennis Delmont regarding the hiring of a new police officer. Police Chief Delmont briefly reviewed the memorandum stating that based on their testing and evaluation of the candidates for the new officer position, they have narrowed the field down to three qualified people. Police Chief Delmont stated that the department is just completing the background investigations on each candidate. Councilmember Hartmann moved to authorize the -Police Department to make a contingent offer of employment to hire a new police officer and that the offer will be contingent upon the successful completion of a physical and psychological examination. Councilmember Anderson seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 PURCHASE OF Council acknowledged a memorandum from Police REPLACEMENT Chief Delmont regarding the purchase of a VEHICLE replacement vehicle due to a serious problem with the transmission in the Ford Taurus. Councilmember Hartmann moved to approve the purchase, by the Police Department, of a 1989, or newer, vehicle from a rental agency, along with extended warranty at a cost not to exceed $11,000. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 REMINDER OF Council acknowledged a memorandum from City MEETING DATE Clerk Kathleen Swanson reminding the Council CHANGE that there will be no meeting on July 3, 1990 and that that meeting has been rescheduled to July 10, 1990. The Council further r ', June 19, 1990 Pag� 7 acknowledged that the Cable Commission has been notified of the change and that a press release was submitted to the Sun Current to notify City residents of the change. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Blesener stated that she has received several complaints regarding a home that was built three years ago with no lawn installed. She questioned if there are any ordinances regulating lawn installation. Mayor Mertensotto informed the Council that on July 7, 1990 at 4:00 o'clock P.M. there will be a park dedication ceremony for the Hagstrom-King park. Councilmember Cummins stated that he would be able to attend. Mayor Mertensotto stated that it has been tentatively scheduled to start the July 17th regular meeting at 7:00 P.M. and to have an appreciation night for City Planner Howard Dahlgren and former Councilmember Liz Witt after that meeting. Administrator Lawell informed the Council that the City had received a letter of resignation from Bernard Friel stating that -he will no longer be able to serve as the City's MASAC Representative. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmember Anderson moved that the meeting be adjourned to 7:30 o'clock P.M. on July 10th. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:00 o'clock P.M. ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor Kimberlee K. Blaeser Senior Secretary CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAROTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP - AIR NOISE MINUTES, JUNE 11, 1990 The special air noise workshop meeting of the Mendota Heights City Council �was held on Monday, July 11, 1990, in the City Hall Conference Room, 1101 Victoria Curve. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 8:05 o'clock P.M. The following Council members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Anderson, Blesener, Cummins, and Hartmann. Staff inembers present were: City Administrator Lawell, City Treasurer Shaughnessy, and Administrative Assistant Batchelder. Also present were residents Phyllis Miller, Mike Gannon, David Sloan and Ginny Dwyer, all members of Mendota Heights' Citizens for Quieter Skies. INTRODUCTIONS City Administrator introduced the issues to be discussed and conducted a round table introduction for everyone. Lawell indentified the issues as the Mendota Heights Corridor proposal being discussed in MAC's Blue Ribbon Task Force, the MAC's recently announced airport expansion plans, and the new airport proposals. CORRIDOR PROPOSAL City Administrator Lawell described our corridor proposal made to the Metropolitan Airport Commission's subcommittee for noise issue, the Metropolitan Airport Sound Abatement Council (MASAC). Lawell described how the corridor test proposal had been shifted from the MASAC forum to a newly formed blue ribbon task force to consider the proposal made by Mendota Heights. He stated that the blue ribbon task force consisted of Eagan officials, Mendota Heights officials, Nigel Finney and Steve Vecchi of MAC, Metropolitan Council officials, MPCA officials, Scott Bunin of MASAC and officials of the FAA. Lawell stated that three blue ribbon meetings had been held. Lawell stated that the first meeting consisted of organizing the process and groundrules for the committee. Lawell stated the second meeting was a presentation of data by the MAC and that the third meeting was an opportunity for both Mendota Heights and Eagan to present their viewpoints. Lawell described the data presented by the MAC as extensive, that it consisted of tapes of over 150 hours of the control tower giving heading assignments for departing aircraft. He stated this data provided a distribution of use between the two June 11, 1990 Page 2 parallel runways. Lawell stated that the MAC is collecting data from weekdays. Mayor Mertensotto explained the MAC's statistician and sampling procedures. City Administrator Lawell stated that headings will be correlated with wind and ARTS radar. He stated that at this time nobody knows what the wind factor is. He stated that one surprise to us was that there appeared to be equal use of both runways. Councilmember Cummins inquired if our consultants, David Braslau and Robert Collette were satisfied with the methodology. Lawell stated that Bob Collette was surprised with the quality of the data. Lawell stated that while the data was considered accurate it was limited to those time periods in which it was taken. Lawell stated the data showed that most stage III aircraft departed from the south runway. Lawell showed a Mendota Heights map with the overhead flights diagrammed on it. Mayor Mertensotto stated that this data is for departures only and that the landing operations are a big concern to Eagan. He stated their premise is the total noise and that Mendota Heights is not impacted more than Eagan. Mayor Mertensotto stated that Eagan is relying on land use compatibility and not opening up new areas to air noise. In response to a question, Mayor Mertensotto stated that there is no other area than Mendota Heights that receives as many overflights. Discussions ensued about the blue ribbon task force and the progress being made with the MAC and Eagan. ERPANSION PLANS City Administrator Lawell stated that as part of the dual track approach that the MAC was compelled to look at expansion plans for MSP. He stated that what began as twelve proposals has been narrowed down to four options. Lawell described the third northern parallel option that would take military property, Minneapolis homes and would require infrastructure replacement. Lawell stated Minneapolis' objection to this option. Lawell stated that the purpose is to expand capacity of the MSP. Lawell stated that Mendota Heights is actively opposing any northern parallel runway and he described the resolution the City had adopted stating our opposition to a northern parallel runway. Lawell stated that ground capacity, land constraints and Northwest's need for 92 more gates by the year 2000 are pushing the need for a new NEW AIRPORT June 11, 1990 Page 3 airport. Lawell stated that the decision on the expansion plans by MAC will be made this year. He stated that the MAC would have to make a recommendation to the state legislature on long term capital improvements and that this would have to include their expansion plans. Mayor Mertensotto described the dual track approach. Councilmember Anderson inquired if the City of Mendota Heights had a formal policy established on the question of moving the airport to a new location. Mayor Mertensotto responded that the City had endorsed the dual track approach and that we are attempting to work within the system to make MSP a more viable urban airport. Mike Gannon inquired about the City's policy on expansion of the current airport. Mayor Mertensotto responded that the capacity at MSP will have to be expanded. He stated that maybe the increases are too big of a detriment and that the solution might be: not so much hubbing, not as much corporate and military use, and that MSP may have to live with its limitations. Councilmember Cummins stated that the issues of two airports had been looked at in the dual track approach study and that everyone involved in that study had felt that the concurrent operation of two airports was not feasible. He stated that the MAC would need to close the current airport and sell the land to pay for the new airport. Councilmember Anderson stated that he felt some concern about the residential nature of Mendota Heights being more important than the industrial tax base. He stated that the industrial park could be built before the airport move and that there might be a painful transitional period but that new tenants would come. He stated that we have many locational advantages besides the airport for economic development. Anderson stated that it is a -, ,, ` matter of economic tradeoffs. City Administrator '' "�Lawell� stated that Mendota Heights does have locational advantages and good highway access which would remain even if the airport were to move. Councilmember Anderson stated that the airport can not continue because of the limitations on the size. The dual track approach, Northwest Airlines committment and the proposed maintenance base were discussed. Councilmember Blesener inquired about the timing of the dual track. City Administrator = .June 11, 1990 Page 4 Lawell replied that the Metropolitan Council was going to choose a search area over the next several years. He stated the MAC would then choose a site in 1996. He reiterated that the MAC would make a recommendation on the expansion plans this year. Lawell stated that Northwest Airlines is on record as saying they don't want split airports - they want to open a new one and close the old one. STRATEGY GROIIP City Administrator Lawell described the Highway 55 Study by the City planning consultants and stated an updated study would help protect the Acacia/Hwy 55 area from any safety zoning that the MAC may want to do in this area as part of an expansion plan. Mike Gannon stated that Mendota Heights should form a coalition to stop any third parallel runway to be built north of the existing runways. Councilmember Anderson stated that if we oppose a northern third parallel runway then the City should be consistent and should support moving the airport. Councilmember Cummins stated that for the next four or five years it would not be inconsistent to support the dual track approach and also oppose a third parallel runway. Mayor Mertensotto stated that many businesses in Mendota Heights are dependent on the airport and therefore may not welcome relocation of the airport. The members of the Citizens for Quieter Skies that were present wanted the City to fight a third parallel runway on the north side. The workshop addressed the issue of long range goals. Councilmember Cummins stated that Governor Perpich would be appointing a new MAC Commissioner soon. Mike Gannon stated that the goals of the Citizens for Quieter Skies were to oppose the northern third parallel runway, to support a new airport, to contact local legislators and inform them of local concerns, to fight for more noise controls and to affect Z the MAC and Northwest Airlines. .�1.�, �eJc,tylo�ns o.�C, o6p�'�'''S a�' Councilmember Blesener stated that the City had a citizens group, consultants, staff and an interested City Council and she inquired about what the best structure or process would be to use these resources to more proactively affect the air noise issue. Jeff Laramy stated that we need to reduce and contain air noise. .� June 11, 1990 Pag.e 5 Councilmember Blesener stated that the City needed a strategy for addressing the goals identified that she summarized as: 1) noise controls; 2) opposition to northern third parallel; 3) corridor changes and 4) stronger representation on MAC and in the legislature. She inquired about what the best approach to achieve thes goals would be. The City's 1991 budget was discussed. Treasurer Shaughnessy stated that there wasn't additional money in the budget for consultants or extra staff on air noise. Ginny Dwyer stated that the resources available to the City, with staff, the CQS, some consulting and Council committment could produce a workable strategy group. Mike Gannon described Airport Neighborhoods United (ANU) that had as its members South Minneapolis, St. Louis Park, St. Paul, Eagan, Mendota Heights and Mpls. Park Lovers. He stated that ANU was looking for a high profile speaker to work on moving the airport and also a speaker from Austin, TX to talk about the economics of not moving the airport. Mr. Gannon described the CQS's current activities and the questionnaire they are designing. Councilmember Cummins suggested that the results could be published in the Heights Highlites. Councilmember Blesener suggested that staff and the CQS draw up a proposal to address the structure of a strategy group. The CQS suggested that a strategy group could consist of two CQS members, two staff inembers and one Councilmember. There was consensus on this suggestion. Councilmember Cummins suggested that the City consider an intern to assist with this group. He stated that this strategy group could work well with minimum impact on the budget and that the City could convene the first strategy group session to discuss a job description for an intern. ADJOURN There being no further business, the workshop adjourned at 10:00 o'clock p.m. Respectfully submitted, . Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant TO: FROM: SIIBJECT: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 10, 1990 Mayor and City Council Tom Lawell, City Adminis��`�� Add On Agenda for July 10, 1990 � One item has been removed from the Unfinished and New Business section and placed under the Consent Calendar.(***) One additional item has been added to the Unfinished and New Business section. (**) Additional information has been submitted for two items already listed on the agenda under the Consent Calendar and the Unfinished and New Business sections. (*) • 3. Actenda Adoption � It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda printed on pink paper. 5c. Mendota Woods - Resolution. See attached map of Mendota Woods. 5i. Case No. 90-22: Eckles - Variance Approval of a twenty-two foot variance. 9c. Case No. 90-03: Centex Homes See attached memo. (22') front yard setback 9d. Reception for Howard Dahlqren and Liz Witt. See attached memo. MTL:kkb i a • A�ETITTON FOR VARIANGE FROM MENDOTA HEIGHTS C I TY OF:D I NAhiCE # i t>�.� 1 T�� t h e n�� r t h a r� ci w e s t �� f t h� i n t; e r s��_ t i. �� n �:.� f H�,� b� r• C� n d F' c� n ci v i. e� w DrivP, ciire�_�1y ��r��s fr��rn �i-�e end �:af the I-It�iber F'��rid �nd w�l4:inc� p�t:h, lie� �i r�r�,r��y hil.:l��ir�e c�f �:�ppr�M�,;im��t�l,y ��np ��_:re. Thi.� :i.Ga th� 1��Mati�an �T�f tl7n �ar��perty r�qu�sting a varian��e. ��ity Orclin�.n�_e #ti�:��>1 cl. �. .�. 1:.� W S t�1 �+� 7. '�: }/ '%. �::� 5 E? �? (<. ri tl t� t',` t"i i�=� Y' �w e til �� W). li G� r� C1 G� �= I,.t �; �; 7. il C.j �� 'F f-i 1" c.� S{F.i E:? � ancll��r- weeds wl�r�_n th�y e.��d tw�lve ir��=t��s in hPiql-i� <�rtd tl-3e qr�.�w�:h is deem�d rl��k:ra.m�-�nfa1 �l:t� th� r�erE�ral t��.��r� ��#f tt�e �=��mrr��..�ni.ty. Or�E�a �a..��t�� mpi�int h�� t;��r, r��civc��J t�y tl-�e �_ity. � il L � �'! 1" P_ �? '� cl ITl 1�. 1 E' S W il �� Y E' S]. f.� 2 �! 1`1 �1 �� 1" j: 1�� I"1 G� �=� � t: il 1�a F] 1' �� F� � r t y �l c.l'�/ E.' maintained tfie hillside in a nati..tral �i:��Le whi�_M bl�nds in with and a�rts �� a na��.�ral, �_r_�mpl�ment t�:� t;he H�.�ber F'��nd �rea. F� 1��_�1 n�t- ur�l i�t h�s dis�_�.��<sc�d thi� hillside with i.�s ��nci ��c1va.�Pd that m�_�winc� th� tall �:br�_�m�:� gr��Es w��ild r�sult; in �ir�_��i��n p�r��ialern� �+fi th� �=:t�-:�y. st��il, p�_�rr,��te the :ir3v�esi�_�r� ��f we�ds ar�d thistl�s i;=_� taF�e {_�v�r i;l-�� tall �nd tt�9.,�i:: �:br,_�m�:a qras�e�v, �nd red�t�� Ilc'1.C31t:s�t f��r qr _,�tnd n�1�,4a.nq L,ir�i� �nd c��he� 1��,_�l wild.li�FL. i I f y��tt are int�r•c�t�d in s��pp� �r�: inca a v�r a.�n�_� fr� �rr� l�l�nd� ��r �i He��9.cln�h'-� ��rdina�_e #1i��:�1 f��r •the �b��ve I-�illside s�� th�.t it �_r;n be m��inta.ir��d envir�.mmentally in it�. n�t��r�l stater pl�zs� aic�n i.n�lividua�.ly wii;hr _y��ur name, addr��s, �nd dat� �,el��w. The ab��ve p�tit9.�w�n �nd �iqn�tui^es b�l��w ar� heinG presentecl t�,� tt-�e M�nd�_�ta Neigl-�•ts ��ity i::�_�,_�r��i1 by �he thre� f�miiies list�d }�y n�-�rr�e nnd add�e�s a� f��ll�_�wsc J�_,aeph and J�_«n �1e1 s��,n '.��E,� ��_ !-Ee �_:��r t Br�.��e �,nd i=h�r ie F:ei��i-��_�w :_,�7� Ftp�rl-�r� i:� �t�trt �:r�,ert; and C:h�-��^l��tte 8.,7�=��crg '�:�;6s�> �ipa�_he ��srt IVAME ADDi�ESS DATE '-=�.�� ____ a��-��,e.��________ '�-s g�_._ ' �� _ _ -- _ _ �a?� �1Ai�?�"%1io� ,�,�'_ _ _ _ _ .- _ _-� - s'=9 � _ ._ l � � �� ____��.�_ ��;�r��__.__.��o__� � � � �� __.��_�_ - �_---�7�.- -� � f� _ _ � `� �' �- _. ' -��=" - .- - W 7-- � =`� -.. � . . _ _ �� _ __�._ _ _ �f�-��_ ._. � _ _ � � � 5 _ �-�- � sv.-� s t�-� cz � c�-_ _ .__� � � ��.�.,� _ � A PETITION FDR VARIANCE FROM MENDOTA HEI6HTS CITY ORDINANGE #it�01 �:��ge '� � NAME ADDRESS DATE _ �Ui�� s,�s/�1... ��r��- - - ��-� C _ �,�n-'�_ Ln_� _ - -- - �� I�' I 1a-- _ 1 /I� � - �" - - - - �- - - -�� _ C��"'`^e �= _ - - - �=5=�� -- -- Z _ � �v-�x.� _ _ __ _ _ _ _ G 9/_ c� ,w,� L� -- -- - -�- - - �= S .- y° _. _ ' " _ _� _ C . �C;(�.��,f� - - .._ _ .� 9� -.- ..- - � -�� ..- �-- - - �7 -s - 9 �.�.._ . - --------------� ��Y -��'=`��--�-.�-- �-��_5� i - - - - .�� ou-� c�> _ _ _ _ �v v _��,�� us. _" �`-x�`'`�-. -- - - - �� ' /9 a _ i � `_� _ ' _ ��!�"��1- - - -• - - �� - `� - .Ly'u'`� � ' " •Z"'„n = - - - �/� L (� v �•-� � - ---U_ -- -----�?-�- - �----2�syou_ ; �, _ - _. _��o-.� _ _ �.�_/ � ��- _ __ _ _. 2 = s'� :�v . � - - --� --- �7_v��_ -- ��------�'��:%�%�- � ' C i��%�� t/ _ c._ i r�2�� C5 Z � - �_--�_.��- - - - - �3- 3 ��.a-�,.,-�, �.sZ -• - - - - - - - - `� V ��GILC._ ��%�/''� _ �� /�l�t��/� -- - •- - - �� -�� 1 L� ' ` � �� vv�-�- �� .�� ` _ �J'.'� L�C ��,�,�'c� �-�-�-` - - - - - -� ;!��/�� -/- --",, ,� -------- --- ,�f, -� � � � _ ��Z-i�.- ' � � �� ;�.- - - �' �g 5J ,��c'",'�"c,`� -�'"�`- - - -- - - -��L'- � "l�i�-�L '_��'1', �.��-�%�c-�� i�� cC� ��.. �� - ��- �'�; ,� _ ; _ � ._ . _ `� o �/ ,Q� `. � 7 (% U / �LV�,�IL-C �- .�.c:-�-;,.�. _ _ _ _ ��°� ? ` _-C.� �,�=� �".y— �—`ZL.— — — — — , /_R- � = l_ _ : — ' — — — `��,`{�— �J._ _ _ _ Po?!1 .S_�c�%ez- C1� — — — — — r, —�— ��— � n /I � � --��L�� "�'��-��` ��-- _��-��_��-�� C��------�%-._�_��J � �� ..�.-.l .� �_ �- - - - - - - -� °s _ °� �! �_ �-� _ _ _ � _ 1-� - �� _ �� ,, � , � �. . ��4 Ltn �1 - - - - -� � `-' - C C ``'�� `�'�=`�= - - - � " � -- �� - -- �- -r --� , � C '' �ti-' �._ � c_�Z. T � � , , � - �� - iC J . - � - ;- - - - - - - - - -/- -� �=�`' �J`- �� -�`�- - - - - - - �;; � � /j� _ ''r:t,�L`'��'G^,��' ?-��„�(�`�c2�— — — — /-yG� � _ C_`<(��=-ti.__�"i1� _ _ _ _ �-��- -1 C� r ` � � �� C� � � _, _ �� . ------`�w..r�`��__�'�..��c�c9��h• ------1-_i--�C, - -��.��.�1�- - - - - - ��l � _ (�'.��:�_i.l� �.��:�_-- - - - 7 � ? =�°� ' -----�--- ;:.(..� ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ -------------------------------�----- r A PETITiO.N FO� VARIANGE FROM MENDOTA HEI�HTS CITY ��:DINA�CE #i��1 i�� the n�:'�rth ar�d west ��f th� inte�r�t��_ t i�w�ri �r�f H�..tt��r �-�nd F'� �ncivi.�w llr ivey dire�_1:1 y ar: r� �� fr�w�m �h-�e end �::�f the H�.�ber F'� �nd and w�1 E: i.ric� p�th. lies a c�ras��y hill�ide �w�f ra�F,r�.��:imal:�l,y �_�ne a��:re. Thi� i.�., the 1�-��ai: i�_�n i:�f th� �3r��p�ri;y requPst ing � var i�n�Me. �� it;y Di�cJin�ri�_� #t:tr►�:>i E1 �. �. �� W 5 'f �'1 ��_�. •r, y��::� S� C' i�: ei Cl (j t=? Il �' �� 1" �� t� ftl C� W 1. tl C� t3 t"i Cj �= i..t �: '� :t. I"t t:� �:+ f ca y" c:1 � rii t� � andl�_�r' w��ds wh�n the_Y e:;�_�et� �:w�lve iri�_t�� in heigi�t �:�nd tl-i� e1r�;wt;h i� d��aied cJ�fir:im�ni;al i;�t �he r�er�t�ral �t��w�c� ��f the �_��mrn�_�n�.ty. Uro�� cii..i��E"t �_�_�mpl�xnt !-�a<s b�en rct�eivt�d by tl�� t_:i�:y. rn� thr•�� families wh�� re�icle ��n ��M�rti.�,�r�� _�fi thi� p��rty hr_�v� m�ini:�ined tl-�e hillside in a natural ��:�i:e whi�=h blenda in with and a�_ts �s a natt.�ra1 �_� �mplement t� � the H�.�E��r F'�µ�nd are�. A 1�.�c �1 n�t— ural i�t has dis�_�.�ssed this hzllside �ji.th us and advised tf�at m��winc7 the t�ll �:br��n��? r�ra�ses w��uld ir��s�t11; iri er�_��ic�n pr��blems c�f ti�� _l�y S��l.l� (7Y��f1'��+tL`� �t"tE' :tr'tV?Sl�w�(i �� WB�aS r.�Ti� �}115��.Es� �i� �t-t��:G+ r�VE?Y ��'1t� tall and tr�i��: it•r��rne:� qr�as�e�, and r�d�,t�M� F�abi��: f��:�r- gt��und n�=�ti.r�q��',ird� and �a7�Gi-,er� ]. _,�a.��I wild2 ife. ?' f>r�W�i.� ra;^? interest�d in s��pp�'r�l; int� a v�,�� i�n��e fr� �rra l�Ier�cJ,,t�� H��.�h�:� �,=rdir��_c �#is?e:�i f��r �the ab��ve hillsid� s�w� th�t i� c�an be maint�int::d ei�vir�_�nm�r�tally in i�s na�:��r�]. �tatey p'l�as� �iqn ir�ciividually wii:h y��ur n�mcr a.cldr-F�s, and d�t� bel��w. Th� �t,�_�ti�c� F��titic�n �nd �iqr��tur�s b�l��w are bFinq pre��nt�cl t�� the M�nd��ta hi�igh'ts ��:ity ��:��itr��_il by �i�e thre� f�milie5 Z15'�PCU Fy rr«rrr� �nd addr�ess �� rt�:�l l. � tw�: r, Jc�seph anci J��an 1'�lelsan '�3G� Ap��,he E.�,u3�t F��r-t.i�_E and i=her ie F:ei�Ml`��_�w :=�i�� A�a�=h� i=.� ��.trt F:'��bert ��nd f=h�t�l�_�tte 5..7��E�'q '��Ec:� �p�cl�e �_�_��.��t NAME ADDRESS DATE F%��-�- �-_ - -. - - �='�- �° _��a� '?�.� �_ _ �f %� ' _ . �� -_ � _ _ _ �?��'� � _ _ �-� �..-�......__ _ ��.�.;/..�'_� _ ' �'� �= - _ _��2-��5. _ �`��v_�.�t�� - - -- =��`�- �� U�- - - ' � � ��'�� 1��s�u� �,�� ._�;.qa '�� 'v10 5 � . ✓ ��` ��iz��4=/c_�--�-�. c�o�r�D...�Z �1�.La�r,i.�� ._ _ - _ -- _. _ Z��-`-��- � �c� __ � `� � . ��C�,� C9 tfl l �-�e� e n�e.. �- �.• _ - -- - � " � r� � - -� - ; - _ . � _ _ �.. _ _ __ ._� � __ _ _ __�� _ � �.�_ ��e ��,��__ - _. _ `� .� f �� _ � � . � � � A PETITION FOR VARIANCE FP,DM MENDOTA HEI6HTS GITY ORDINANCE #1t�U1 i:p�qe '� � '�-�- �. � - - -��3 ��-� � - - �_ ' . - -- - �-f �` ` �` �%v � , � - - � � �c = � _ / =C.L�•�Cv �1-- _ _ �� _ T �c7 _ � _ _ . > � ' � -r��✓=G_ _ _� �-�rc t _�, t �\ 4u.�.� ` :_ J, _� `�.,c�.1��.��.e,,�- �..�J �-� ��- - `� �`-- - - - r . ��. t _. _ : � .,- � I�1.._ ��- �� i , —'j�G�SOE��L�.�J — — (�/ �/ll �Ll�GLC.�6�(_ C7 , r G/� �� L� -- — — �..G � � �l `,.'_ i . / � � � � r. - — — ^.� — — � �J S � , - -�- — -- — �'_- � , �..� ` _ � - ,, •� n,�-�z�. ..��: � '• " �. - ' ,- � � ,%� 1 �-� ) [ � �" � — — — — � �i ��,/�. , �}�•%L'— — � � �' - � _ � � ,�� -_��-- --- --� ,- , v�� _. - - - - � `� � _ ��u� , �_�.r��'_--... _. _ _ _ ` .._ ' 1 `-� �.� � � - � �i,_ �� + ��L=�— — — — —�- � � _.. Ci- -'1(�� — -- — -- � — — , � �1 �. 1 ��-�- - - �- - � �Z.�� _. �-��. c�� _. i,�„� _ _ - _ -�--- -- ' ---s,----� _�`==--'------------------------- ' - -`��-3� ��L..��'-�;�-�-�� - - - - - - - -?� �. i _�� ,�.� .��=�--• "�-' - - •- - - -- �' fr 1-� - , �.' v' � • .r, �► � � � c��.��_�. _`^ I ___ , _ �' �� LQ.�Y�..�_, L ��`1�--= - - � � - - - � � - - - - - - - - - - - � - � /-�.' /,�' i � // J (��i, f :-�o [=-t/1�=�'1 .Z :j �':>� .� �.,�.o�,._t ��.-� - % 1 ; �� 1 — — —;Y — — — -1, � � — — — — — � — — =, — `r — — — — — — — .- ' .- -- I E' ; J �� --�--t, — — ��( � ��-- l� _°! 1 ��c.�"��.:1,,�L �' — — ��rl � = �� '�t ��r��' 1 -��C:� — — — — _ �� `1�_; r " � '� �.��-- �� ' y � ,�' _ �-�- G; ti; �.: I��c�-<. (� �, l-'_JJ _ 1 � J � _ i . `.. - - - - - - -- �-- - - - - - - - - - - - �_' _� - — — , —�� '�� X .;li��% �� .l _ — — — — — — �''(� — `=��A=C` �-^C:� ��e`) — — — — —� i __ 1 `; � ,�� _ � `� �...�-��.� ( , `( �': �=.a,,,�� ' � ' i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L� - - - �- t _ ,-�,�-... . _ -� - -� -- -� '- .. ; ' , -�-� � -- J .�• .�.. ) J y ; _ , . ' � ' ' �" -- l � "�� i ' c.� � � �. — — — — — — — -,/ �,.��- '_ _� ,- �% �_�= .7%= _ . ,_ � �1 �� ` , _`�/__ �i _ � ,�- � J � ! _ _ — _,�r , l _ _ , ,� � ,�.. `Z�. .�� - - - - - - ��.�- - �� -z�= - - - � --�/ /� � �: o � / -�%��'� — —`�'�e'`'— — — — � %U _� �e_, ��. — — — 7/�-/ %G i /' ' ' � '�o - -- -� -- ------'--- ---c�-----`�/�'�y�' ` - , ; - - - - - ��-� - ►��{� �=� _ _. _ � ��'�.�,� � .�� 'I "' - �� - - - � !7�'� _ c.e �ti .� � G; d'-t�,-.-- - - f�' � t ,- ��.—,� .�_ _ _ _ _ r" _C) � � - ----�-- �-;�- � / ` / r — — J — — �iGr-G,�.�-"'�— — — — — l'J (j/ � _ �,f�.-i/,� • �� r ) `• y � ,c' � � ;� _' — �-�- �—;\ c,:..�<y-= _ _/ _. :�--�-- j � - '� - =2��..__ �-_ 1''12v.�yL.�...(L �, _ _ �.CJ t,�C_-j _ : f_��,�l�.�- �=�~Lc�__ - - � � �-, -- /'� 7- � !"` . � A PETITION FOR VAf�IANCE FROM MENDQTA HEIGHTS G I TY OFD I NANCE ## 1 O�J 1 T�_� tMe n��rth �.aricJ west ��f th� inters��t i�:�n �:�f H�.�t��r anci F'� �ncJview DY1VPr dire�=tly �,��r�� fr�w�rn �F-�e er�d �::�f the H�.tber F'��r►d and w�lE inc� path, 1 ie� a c�ra_��ay ha.].lside r_�f ap�r�:��;im��i:�ly �_�ne ��rre. l"hi� i�� the 1�-��_at a.�wm �w�f thP ��r��c�rty rPquest a.ng a v�r i�n�:F3. r_:ity Di^rJin�n�_E #�1{>t:ri c1�.�.��WS tflE? �=1�':)/ f:�::� �E:'E-'F; c�CiCi �Ilfit=�Y'�� fTt��rWa.11Cj <:t1'tC{ �=lt'�'i::1.t7Gj �w+f {�i"c�!�St=?� andl�ir we�ds wh�n th�� e:�M�ed tw�Ive in�_n�� ir� heictht �nci ti-�e gr�.�wth is dec�n��d d�tr:in7en�(�,�i �(:�_� �F:he qer�eyrai t��w�r�c� "f �Et•re �_�;r��m�sn�.1,y. Or�� it�_h �_� �mpiaint l��a� b�er� rc��iv�d by th� �_ ity. The. 1:hre� f�mi7.i�s wh�_� resi.de ��n p��+r��ti�,�i-�� .��f t;his pi��m�Fi�rty r��ve msint�ined th� hillside in a nat�.�ral �1:��;e wt�i�_h blend� in with and a��ts �s a nat�_�t�a1 ��mpl.�ment t�� the H�.�ber F�,�nd �re�. F-1 1�_��_�1 nat- ural i�t has dis�_u�sed thi� hillside wi.th ��s and �dvi�Pd tl-�at m��winq the tall �:br��m�1 qr��es w��uld ir��tif; in er��i.��n p�r��talem� �af th� �_2ay s��il, pr��m�tte the ir�v�-tsi��r� ��f weeds �r�cf this�:[e� tE,� tal��:� �_�ver tl-�e tall �nc� �hi{_F� f:brF_�rne:� grasse�, �and redu�Me habit�#: f�_�r c�r�aund n�sting �irds ancf ��rther� l�_;,_�-�1 wildl.ife. ti I f )��.a are in#;er�ested in s��pp� �rt ine� a v�t� ianc� fr��rn C'lend� �t� Heiqhts ��rdina�_e ##1��:�1 f��r •th� ab�_�ve hillside s�_� tF-��t it �_�n be mairrtair��-ci envi��_mmentally in i�G� natur�l state;, pl�asc� �iqn i.ndivi�ually with y��ur nam�, addr��r �nd datE b�l�r�w. The �b� �ve pet it i��n �nd �iqn�tures beI ��w are bea.nq prPsenterJ t� � the hi�ndr��a Heigf�ts ��:ity i�:��un��il by the three f�rr�ilies list�d i�y r�am� and addr�=�s a� ft��ll��w�c r J�� ,�eph anc3 J�_��n I�le7. s��n L�ru�_e and i=her ie F:ei��hc�w F:�_�bert �nd �=h��}.�r{tte S..jt�ka�rct :�u6� �pa�=1�e E=:�,urt :_ �� r�� _ n � �_ � ��.�,- �: '��6�;> �pa�_he 3=�.��irt �a NAME ADDF�ESS DATE ; r` ��.. /.�-,'1�.. i,�� 1;��'"L.,,��.� .: j �J 4' i {'�7�}��i!'�- '�. `-` � . 4�_ _ �% � .__ �ai� r 1 ,,- � C ... _ _ _ � _ _ .... � _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _. - ... ,.. _ _ _ ._. _ � t^.' ' ``�� - �\'� _ .� _ ... _ ... _ � � i � y ; _. _ _. _ _. � f _ ._ _ t ,�� /( �t t �� t t t � � � w C•' j C.. }(.,t�) % J _ ��.�� Z�G:%��,. _.. _ � _ ._ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ � — — '— i — �/�2 �� — i„ �— — � _ ('�' G„_.5 _ _ _ _, } � � , .'�' w, '� t � W ' � �j:_.�i' �' � � F .� t�_ Gt [_ c,-�. '� �� '� i '}t� t 4 �.-L �-i:. _ ��.k.�.- _ :.- _.,� C�.,.T -/ _ � � '_ ttz-�C �'{ _ ��%1_`�� _ _ _ _ _ { r � � - - - ' 1 � � _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - � � ' � �, i�-r�=---..� c--�� ' ! , � ' j _ _ _ � _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ - - � � - - - _ _ �__ _ _ _ _. - -- - - - _.. - -�_ �'��--�--�_:�=.s.u��'________._M____�_____-_-'t----' -- . � ,� ' f �i :i i � ' L-''.(/" z"" �r,�.'''� ...c�� __' G�i .... ,-� � �� ._ ..�•` '�,J.:Gr'..''�:.(�... ii� � f �''�'�� t/ , � ,� ._ . ..._ . .. . . _. _ . _._ :�5 ...:. ._.. _. . . {�. � . ._ _... . ._. __ A PETITION FOR VARIANCE FROM MENDOTA HEIGHTS �: I TY OF:D I NANCE # 1 uU 1 c� aq e'� � NAME ADD�ESS DATE % r)�: � ,•') • / � _ , �--��' _ _ ��.' - - - � t�. - " �.� - _'�-�'��c•=,��.�.J - - --� �_�?� ` r�' � C� -,- � ��-' -�-- -- - - � Z s _ �`=-�� U;�,� �- -_ � � � /, a � - �,� ---- -- - -- - -� T�'---- � .�U,�_ /� �'��.��'��-�=� .�i� ��G1�� _ _ � , �� _•, ,� �1 �._� _ �� _ ��,,-,_��--._. `a�'�'� __ ._ : �� _-�-��C�`�.�.. __ �_ ,�.�.-� c,�� - e��, `� � � - -- � �%��-� _ _ _ _ _� .� 6 �.�.��_ �� - - -- -- �-�� -�-�- �-1--`�-- �''" � . - �t%- � - �`'t''��.- - - - - �' �� __ ('� _' _ ' � .�—= _ _ - -- - �-' �_- � � - � __��_c� � - - - - i��J _ _ � 3 2. _ 2��,�r� _.�-ur--�.� �- - _- �.. ��'_� - y'� _ I ��=, , � � � � �l/��F��l<� �' � �„ _ �-+ �� --� - - -------- --` � ._E��_-�� ------ `�=-�-- -� - �"t'�c�-=- - - - �-�� ._ ..��c�,�.� �'�`f-�"�-��',.- _. _. __ _ .�� -��-� ��-��' - � S��- . ..-��ts�' ts�,�'�►'dx'►_�t�. ��,�.�Y�, (�� 1�. �o Yle� v �( 4,1.4� �'• -- -- - - - � �-� �.�� -- - � __ _C�-S.� _�� .�aN�Q v�_^r�� _ _ __. _ _ _ _ �j-�/�� _ _ � � V �� \ I - - �=°� - - - _ _ _ �>� ��U-�� ,,�-%�_. _ _ _ -- - �- -- � !� 12 `� -- - ��)�//J� �% � / / ._ ��`_`" _ .__ _.."V_ _ _" _ "_ _ � .J� _ / G"`tY �/�%L�_ , lJ"�� - _ _ � - _. ). ` -� �./ .L��.l ' 5-r�� ---- ��-� �u�e�., _-----�/_ -f� - �.�. - - - c�c - - - -�� _ � s�� _- - ' a ,� � - - -�, .� _ _. _ �' _� \ _.. _' c��'��-�I:�� _.��'� �- - - -- - -�/-5_,��j �'-. _ � ��? -- •- - y - �`3�-G!/c��--�� 2.G-�-c_.. ._ ._ _.. _7_ �/�a __ _ I - - -�'- - � _ � 3 ( - C�t1_e��c�.e,c�C %=��. _ - - �- - �W � v -- - ' ______��_�____ _� ____ 7 ��1._�__ � - - - - - - - - - - - � � � lJ a 1� � _ _� � .� - - - - - W- -� � � ��-� - - - - � , _ y�� v �"�^ti+,,... — -- — — .�zld crJe�l-�irS��er r�as� — — — — 7i �1 `7 '7— — — — I � — �-�/� ��o'��t'/K/ `�' ` — — — — — — — — ! �� -� �G — — � •. �� _��-"�-�---------�--�-=�_I �� __ �� b��.y;��L� _________�_�-�� .. - �__ ��-'=-='-----------?=�-'`'v � � r _Lo� �f _ � �_ r _ .L,-._ � � ,t.� _ f/�.'� ' ��s�-.�-------%�=�_'�� :� .�� _ - -7� �-��o : � �/ �;c,t,(. �/�� 1 � rr — — — — ._ — — � ._ . J = �l� = - -� 3� `L _ _G'�c��1�_ - - - - -�= �� =S0 _ � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - � A PETITION FOR VARIANCE FROM MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY OP,DINANCE #10t71 c.�age �J ADDRESS DATE 1 ~ .� ., 2�-S� (�- 7 , S�90 � - - -, - ----- - - -- ----- --- _ � ,�� _ _ _ ��s _-��s.�� -� � = ��_� ' - -� - - -� � _ _ _ .- � � I ._ _. �°�� _._�- __ _ _ � �' . S -�a i _ �,t.� _ /YI �'��' _ �_ -1 y� _ __��`.►,-�s � , �, _ D� . _ - - -- =� = � ' �v � -��-----��__ ��-\��_---_._._��I°�� / �- -- � ��~'- ��`�1-� � ��=--—————�-=J-=`�� , - �� - _ ��-�� _ _ �� , �� _ .- - -- -.. �=�=-.9� i =`'�-- �'-------�-�f.-� . -��-----��0 1 _. -- - - - - -��,�� -. -. -�, _... _ _ _. ._ � -�" _�� / - ��`�' � �—— �`�— —————�ZUI�--.�i,�� •___——--.��.�"�c� l i � � �" --- �6a � a��e. - ------��9° � -- � _- - - -- ��-- i � n � ' I , --�' ,- ----��Z3 ��.��-----.----�� Z� �' �.� -----�z��------- `,/�_/�� I � -"- --=---a��°�-�-�.--------?�.�.-�� %�.o..c�� 1 — — — -- � Oq __ c�,%�-/�,(�Sh 1�--e —� �- — — — — -- - � -- 5��.�." C� / � �� — — �- — � �— — — U D � _- -- — � -- � �--.— — — — — � - c��C7 I _———,—�, �� -��-- -- ----��1_��,��r�-----.�-�-�J, .,, , � , - r�~�=� - - -,� �� s- - � 3? ��'-s ��- ��-- - - - - ? -��- I � � ----------------------------.__------ _.��- , .;. 'J � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ` � � � � � .� � � .� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ' � � � � � � � � � ` � � ` � �� ..�. � r. � � � � ` � � � � � � � � � r .� � : A PET I T I ON FOP, VAFZ I ANCE FI"�OM I'1ENDOTA HE I GHTS G I TY C�P.D I NANCE # 1�� 1 T�r� the n�m�rth arid w�st ��f th� in�;�rs��_t i.t:�n ��° M�..it�er and F'� �ndvi.�w %r ivP, dir��_i:ly a�:.r� �� fr�::�n� �i-�e end �::�f the H�.�ber F'� �rid �r�d w�l E;in� p�th, lie� a c�r�sµ;y hi].1 ,a.c�e ��i' a�aE�r�:�•:i.mrat�l,y �_�n�: ��:re. l"hi� 9.G� th�� 1�W�cat ir_�n �:�f th� �_,r��nerty rPqc.�est ir�q � v<_�r ian��. �w ity UrrJin�n�_ �_ �t:lE:>t�>1. cl. 1 � � �WS � fl� +ti 1.'�; �/ � �.� �E:)E!E; c�iitj �tl �'t='�t" C � �7)�WtW �. (lC� ::1: T1C� �w t»t�:'�: :t. C`tfl �-� � �11' c3 �?=if:ac:, andl��r we�ds wl��n th�y �.�:�ed twelv� ir��ti�� .r� h�iql�t �-�r-�d tl-��a gr�.�w�(;r� i� deemed cJ��ri.mc�n�t.al t�� `Ghe c��n�r�I t��_��aid ��f tl-�e �_i::�mm�_�ni.t.y. C:Jne= <_>�..��_I..i a_�^�mplaint ha� t��e�i� rc��eiv�c� by the �_:ii:y. The thi•�� f�mil.ips wh�_� r�aicl� ��n Fr��rti��ns ��f tFii� }ar�_�F��rty h�i��v� maint�ined the hi.11side in a na�t�tral st;�{;e whi�_h b].�nds i.n with Gznd a��ts �s a nat�.�ral. �_��mplement t�_� th� H�.�h�r F'��nd �rea. F1 1�_��_�1 nat- ural i�t h�.-�s di. ��_�.��5ed thi� ha.l lsid� wi.th us �nd �civi5�d that m��wing th� tall �:br��m�:� p7�a�ses w��ilci r��i_i1t in er�_��ir�n pr�w�blems ��P tF►e �_iay s�_til, p��m�jte tF�� inva=_.i��n ��f weeds �nd �this�lEs ��_� t�1�;� r_�ver tt�� t�ll �nd �hi�_N:: !:l�r,_�r�e:} grassea, t�r�d t��d�tr_� h�bi�:�t f�W�r c�r�titnc� nc�� atir�q E.-�ix�dcs and ��her� la+,��l wildlific. r If y�-�t� are inte��e=.t�d in supp��rtint� a v�,ri.�n�_� fr�_�rn l�I�r��_��:�� I-Ic�:ic�ht<_� ��rdin��_e �#ii�c,ai f�ti�r �the ab��ve hill�ide s�� th�t i.t �_<:�n b� rr�aini;a.ii-��:�.r.i envir�r�nmer�tally in its n�ttur�l state;, pleas� �i�1n i.ndiva.ciu�lly witl�� y��ur nam�, addre�s, �nd datE b�l��w. The �b��vc:� p�.�titi��n �:nd �ign�t�ires tael��w are bei.nq presenterJ t�� the Men��ta N�ights ��:ity �=<<��n�_ iI by �he ti-r�e� famil ies 1 ist�d Fy name a.nc� �dd�e�s �� f�_�ll��.�s. .T�r�sepE-� �ncl J�_�an I�el s��n y36E� Rp ��_l��e �_� �t�rt Etri_��_e and ��her ie �:ei�: h��w .=37� Fi��_I�� i=�_��.�ri: F::r�bert and E:h�irl�itte S..j��k�erq �:�6c_� Ap��_he i=�_<<.irt NAME RDDF�ESS DATE 1 b .p � j _ _ ._ �t i4��j%U�A��G.��iy{.._) _ ... _ �2�� _IarJQ. V1�"?�L(,� �PIj'- ._. _ _. ��:3C)�`j� — — — t jI — — -,%l� c..l.�_�� .�`��.? �- _ _ �? `i(v �'o,rt.�,OG1r��_�� 1 C.��.L�' _ _ _ � l!�%��' _ _ _ - - -;l� � _ ��-1�. - �� -- - - - �? ��_�l �..�Cs/�.�:�J _ _�c_'vi=. _ _ _ <.�? `�'��%��_ _ _. '� r _ _ _��-: ;�-_ ,.� _ _ �:Ur�� _ _ _ �3�j �'��..� l�; �� ,�� _ _ _ �_'��1�� - = _ '�� . �� _ � � _ �.�-� �'��.' .�' _ _ �� -� �� --�� - � -��.�� -� -_--- ____._ _ _�.!. a � � _ /� - �. Q. �'�--� _ ._ _ _ _.� _3 ? _ � x..� t� u : �,�,_ �� `'_ _ __ � ' � `� T. � � _. _ __�#��:�_�.��___.__.___________ _________ _.__ . /�.n � �-`�" .� . �� rs'�---�: �'.�' `� "�'�� --��;.�,�_. �� _. ._. ,�'�'%/�`�' .. 1%' -��'�•-�`��. /j" �.L4:�.xy-�---�----. . _ . .... • . -� ; �; .,.,., . . - . . � ^�.�` � . . . V � ' . ' . ' .._ . . . {'a'r � . " ' . r�:r"','.�+„r -- _ ' .. " ' � .. � . :.�y"'"'� ' . � � �, . - • � r. �'s'l.. ' . _ >,i ".:f� i �t • +•.�. �. . . . • ' ' � • .. • . �'u�� . .. �� . i . • .!.•�.... - �+♦ ...w ' � • .. : .ti:. ri • '�� . ��,• _ . ' _ •'�'�' � �� . - .. . ..... • .. . . . .. .. ' `�_ /-r . ...� �. ♦ . � ' . -�:Y:'• -. ., �� — Y . . "' � �*t1ir�`^'.�,� . .+-• . � -��.�:�_... � .. "� � ... �.� .1 ; i�.�".�s n"�A .�� . � . . • ' . ^ � . � ' • � • -� i.. ' - � • i • . . . � � • .• • . � � . • ' % , - I ' � ~' . •}'�w.+1 V � (� r � � • • • . . • . . . '� . • . � . . ' ~ ;,.�r � � " ' . . , ` • , --" ' , ' ' ` � - � . . r � , . • • � M ' �N . • . . ' . � � ' � �� • ' ' • ��, ' • ' ' ' � • � �� ~ `'.�,f*G, o � . . � ' _ � , . . ' • ' . • � ` s � "-'�4 - t. �. , . , . , ��.+� . :, � � j� -.: "'��„�`'� • {:.�.�A � r� ;,: r�.1k "�-.,,�c.r—_ % ' � I ^`..' � +".'\ • ` . +i T-�-�t�'t wC. 'L i - � � • � � ;! : / � i ^�.. � . y1 . • ' • � ' i t � r" � "-.` =`,., . � • G�t'�= • . . �" � ,� � I .,.-- • -�., `,.. ' . ' ' . . � � � � � /,�,,�� •_/} `_~ � �� ~` ', / • � 4 • //�� ' ' i. . i t "pcG'.�i. � _ _ " f ~� �� _ • �e%I . _ . . . e .. . ' . � . � `t~ j,� \ \ f , `z�"'��aem�,.-sm�re,,s,��►�.. +� \ m , . ' � ' • . • • / . . ..� r,�✓t '��a_.� • ' /J �.f�1wi y �� ' . � �."J(��l�'{TIiS.��'�.. , ' , . �+1. ' - . . . ' � . • � ' ' � . . t� „�,� � . �, - _ ..,� . , ,� 1 �� .� '`�-� '� �"� • � � . n � F " � .� . � . � � �- ... . ' � � �.- - ' . �. � � � t1� - - ' . � �� f •�' �..o�a+�1.--t-c, ��s't' �. . . � ( . � �„j ,r; .. . � . . 'Pawr�� \` . •r ' •• �.,.f' . • . c� ! ".v' � _ , • �h L- _ . � . . .. � = 4 �' � . . � , �i7Er,t�.�.s_ • ' : 1 �C..,'F,'�c��rr ' , ' _ , _ . • ' } �� . i( • :. . - . (j. r. � , � L� �.fT' , fi . 4 , � . . . 1 � . - ' , ` - ' �li �� '�� ' • "�GL'�'1..�.�_.. . . . �.�.as ��\ �,�`�i\ . . � � . . ' � _. , . — ;• , ,�^ . . � r:.� :i� �j�TG4� �f _ . . . .._ , . - � • � . �y� • _ N N .�i, . �`ii » • p7i,,Fa�:.� � • ' • . . : ' � • , . . � . { � .. ;;' z�`z 1 t., � � ' . � �� _,r..,�,�� '"'°� 1 • � � ' �7'� »�4_ .. `i ' .. . _ _ . - - %.x - ' . . . . . � • __... , _ .� ... "..�,:�. ?A �. � . . «.. _. ` .. : � .. i ,._.. •. _ . . . . • . , ^�» : . .. ,1 -- f: . .�Pil�,� . � ,�,.,,. � . • � � , - - : �. .S� . . • J �1J - _ . . . . , - '7►„�,�,,,,,,. _.. _1 , � '�X.l�`7' i • • ,�,�•.;z� . _ �. , t• � ' . '' . _ . � - . • . r �--aG i4. r i , . . - m�:�.,� • �'"a ' . •. ' .�"ti.—r., • ' _ ♦ : ,,. +'� �'!J (' � . .. -+�`� ! �� y^" ' ' ' .. �' .�-``' a , _ I . r 't . . , � •� 'j. . � ,i �� . , i y;, . . '�o��F' S � iGI�F�•' 4--�' • .^.o�s . . � ..-�`.. " Ij� + . . . • �, Sz '".":� � '�.�� K� G � �GF�-r4tN a4 t,i�c E�lL � :,,,� '� ! ' • ' 1 ,�./`.`. . • . ' ' , - ' � Y �� W f�� a u:',e.-. t+/�PLs+.:, ._r �"}'� . . - �` �� . . �; � �" _ � ��v �r}��s<,. • ' . . n ,.aa � . �f �,;,. � . • . ' • : • . - ' . � , , ,�. , • � � �x►�-�t �M� � � .r�� %i . � � . ' Z '-, r ' '�, ' . ' . ` � E � ��. % �� L. i � .. . �-^e�f .-.%� j ' ( � �� .., ��„"' /! � . � ' i ' � �., . � .7.,,.`_c.,= -�^---^"'....--...�.• �.,.,,,,,,,_ , . _,..,�..... -.....,-" I . . I . . .' - , •+a.—+�--+w..• •� ) , o � • O O � .'.. ' ��.1 �, __ . -- _ _ _�_.' „ . ', _..,�...►.�� • ,�`'i ,�F�Fii ��1 '� � �p�.9' `r.1�'[7:t"'L �+� � � . 0 1� ' Y � � „ '- - �a....� i . • N V 1C..r+•..1--J�.+�il�..Ki �.» �!Ci'� �• : , . ' •y'i i :'' ' . ' ' ' . , . •=`:.�.t..y '-r., * . _= :+ - r - 1 ' .. � .. _ . . � . . � . -_ - . . . . . . . :t �,;: * . _ . . :,�..� . ��, . . '- : :l �"�-v'� �tc.. �t�rr.+-t �i��rtG�. , t��tcac�ra; �-s�r, #'ta= . ,: � .. ' � � . ,. '_ .. � .� • _ _ �:•=r ;:'f�.=.' �'� � -. ' .. -- -'+:': _�� :.. �'t-c:i.'i•' .. _ M -`'F�.: ' ' ' .�+.y - ' f � Y. - • < � ' • • • " . � . � �Js�.. 1 ' . ,,if. _ . Jy � e . ._ ._� . n'n � S.w.��. �"�►` _+. �� .{�v' " � �O 's ••• . ','X'� . . .. . • . . . . � . . . .. . -. . .. ' .. . . . r -. ,. � � . . _ ' -----, —� i y. � . , .. • • . . +v '{:�. . ..... _ .. _ . . .- �, ._. . .. .. . �� . ..... . ... RECE�� FEB 13 1s80� - - - _ ,,�/ - / � f � �i. • i R)� )'• / ; ,l, �-` •�� . , / a.s.�, i /� J � ` - _ � /�'C/S'�G / 'i:AT.� ;rFlc�..)c.r_ - i ' '' / ' , � � .._ ` = ^ � ✓rT-t1A(::G '� ' r � ' _" '1 �� +. � �(.�-, i ��.�.:,t. �:.�u-�rz. J � .-�1 i G,ti-r� ' � _ �, '` _._\`; . � ��-'�i� � �.. .� � � �.�...-.�- �. 1 \ M IZ .lo r � � -- -f `� � � ii "� ,_�.r -`-�.._,. � - � `'I�' -'�� , 'D�.c��..� ��— ^�. �.x;Ss- }�-_vuS�r=. \� � i _�_ 1'7�-' , ('" � `(�� `F, o� — �'. � \`�� ,�, �.� � t5( . =��'�c U�x�;,�. �J 3 _ ' � ` ti'' i � � �w�cr� �.��a .c ` '!� � ( � �.a�:.� � � Y - ( � � �i�y�,va_ � ;�C. 'EX1`7'f U� �a! �•� �cri o �j `� �'crvl.. ' 1�ct�� • � � Ctc�c� . i �,ec-„a � . . . ' � .� � _ � a '� '�,/ � . � 1� cn ca - -r-�., \ ( \ ." `�-�'"� ' `�� ,�s�:�� '�'_ . ^ : �A � ,��-S: � � �. �� -.=: _ ��,��. � � "°`' �-�'��'��,�' 43.�Gi.�}�.�.i.A. NMYL� �T�iA i o 0 `Sr7a� 'P��=,i1tsS. � ! LANDSr/tP��ro /�� 1`��.l�b� FK1('fie�G- • Fiti- .Ci'b' , �� \ 1 c.�atL f��NJ •:n.aa To` X i�F�t�-fiu•.� �-- T�CEa � �� (JL(��E�' ; t1..T. t2�i�J.�1` �dn�a';G�L! yta�%f.�+.+ . Yi." F.1C1."3i`W%afSL �G.� �� c--- � (J \� � � '��C-c�is•r�v�Y �r�EG� y�/'`/^� � ,vi'{� V ' •. . . ' ,_ -- "' T'- -• � � •- - _ � � [�cls'ri.S!'r & i.Crn Co�o �.lp-rc,� i . �"1 o N�.rE : �rr� 'r ('r/.JiLcA Lr.� � �'YJri/i:rt 6'J-t'N !•fEOa� � I�-�c�r�i �.� �-� � r.� �-� F'/Ld+Y� D� �i�, � �,�� s c%�'i ��,J � C tTr ��-D��1 ��=�v� 0 CD CD 3 •-+N X O Ofl a 3 OD OD o. O• C Oeel r+ =v cD sel .+ o CD -0 3 F 0 g to E tot �,,,"' W g mC fl0 Dr W �. N ■ 4a3SB3 ajjiASa3Bg NogTH1ANP DRIVE 44. \ \ \ A\i`%\\A \\\ \ \, \ \ \ (\ `t \%\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \\ \\ \ \V- „ .\) \ \ \ N\ \ \ \ \ \ 17 ‘`\4 \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ ‘ , \ \ \ 4 \ \ \ \\\ \\\\ \ \ \\\"\o 1 \\\\\\\\[\\ \\ \\\‘ N \\\\ \\\\ e %16\ \\ \N pk N \ \ \ 'i\ . \\\ \\\\ \\\\\\\\\\ N\ \\ cP 8ve P Z m C) ■ D rn m ■ C m mC) 0 T T- 1 I - 4 D S m N m 0 Na co co C ■ ■ ■ 0 Z N C .0 • rC S.4 x 4-) C ›-, ▪ ) -_ a) 3 C Elis o -1 . 0 N $ a) O a) CI) • -I0 ua •�' N tT M cJ) I N ..0 • rl a-) rO I4 • -1 4"'1 U) 4.) - S1. '0 0.4.1 a) W 0 a) CO •C w O •,-r U a) c- a, (1) a) C ▪ .0 Cs et ••- a) En cn ) s C U) o U) CC 'C •- l M co o a) U) sa 0 W a) rC O satr >., C w iO -Li - a) � O .� Orn• 2 a) • O C >, C C U rICU•t(305a)a)a)Nw re O 'g � -.-i .0 O 3 0 • t� C 'C7 U U a) a) rn >, C H E u -i r C a) C C d H w a) -6) rn U C) - EH a) +-s O 4u •,-I +� G u O ▪ O -1-) a) x • C •• C • ▪ 4-30 +-1 U ••-; 4 0 U .4J a) •,.� a) x ft cC 4-) �r J -Jo": • 3 0 a) U a) N s'a u) rC u) •• E� .c a, v C E-' .0 • 4 -,� r1 v) ▪ r) 4-, aJ w u) u) in v) 0 3 3 v) C .411 U) o u 12 C 0) U c!) 0 . O 0 o E < 0 4-) sa -1 Ln "_ w cn w w O C) U C rC a) H• rC 0 M•- O Sa rc ry ▪ >, � 0 .0 0 N a) +� � +� w . ,4T 4J ' Lo tT a) U a) a) C) - O ▪ c C I 4) C C C a) a) C >. s+ u) . C .0 (1.' .-� w rn .0 0 --I a) o w •• � . •� a) a) tC O -I C r6 0 rC -P .--I , -I .0 o - a J C ❑ U = O ., It $.a o rn r-- sa a) C C X U �-1 -t� 'L5 O a) a) a) Za) u44 +) -a .(sCrCaC 4: 20 .ZaC) .-UcC)I> sCaC)1 ‘1:7 7 t ` 40 - .0uQaC)) a )U) a)U•••I CQ 0 o tr. C1 >1 ❑ C vC1'.$4-1 sarl (1)U a)saaUo�toN-(1) oo U C+) C�)C> • •0 a)U)U .71), Coo 70 ft O -❑i +rC� m aC u�_a) ▪ -H O C N,n +) awM 4)m) -trC4C 4:4 0, ~ �• a) uC710 0) ---1E C rC .N • 0 C C 0 v '0 a) s -a O + C C .1' 0 •H Cr) + x• ) •,.Q O tra)�' Nr, U) cocC 5 .) E-, 'O a) I-) In rC rn m O rt C Sa U C a) _) C 0 C 3 a) t!) t"-) u-, said County. w O L4.4 54 0 a) 'O S -I ft 0 'C7 C.) rx C C 0 U- C) a.) by the records of Minnesota this Dated at C 0 U An Authorized ASSOCIATION H • w E-+ a ❑ �' H z ft E" • ❑ z C z z 4-4 ASSOCIATION MEMBER AMERICAN •r1 �+ 'a C '0 -.-i C .Q .0 0 RI �+ u) .0 U v) m C U) w 'C 4-t O rt O .) O U �a)xU) a) s; U ti C) 5-i O • • Q U) ❑,w V) O C.) '4-1 "0 a) C s- 0 •r+ s., n1 'C U) :J) (1) U) 'L a --I C cc 0,-C ) w 0+) U u-+ C O C O 7••i a) (C --I a) sa • '0 Sa >, u) 'C C :�) sa 0 0 rC u) 0 U ❑. U) U a) .r.) E CJ CO IX U) O ;-a sa 0 E O 4-) -4) it C a) U +� C .0 rC C 0 4-3 sa. EU +) V O >1 r• -I �• wu .0 < 0 s-+ C rC • (1) • U) 4.) U . C U) C r ry rC a) C 1 +J U U) O C s-; U 0 a) 0 (1) U i-1 aJ C (C rye co --I 4 a) 'C 0 0 O C' m C C x c W < >, r:J U a) ❑ v) >, sa sa 0 a) 4•) (C a) ro its 0 U) 'C C C sa it rC U r 0. Cb 0c' - -I ZCO .0 (-4 4-) O -, • W Ln o Cr U) C), O Lr) et N - •H C!) r"- ,„, \ (")— • v.0 N If' N Ei .z to v 30 • •4)C4 v OW!] 3w-6) . 61 Z w0 v O C 4-+ OE+H cc; aw Z -H N .cvro •0 .0CID rzx x• -w • >iZ�DU v 4-I w - E4 --I N X • w W4 -I 0 0 0 c • 5.4 v N U) N .0 !~ v 4.I 4,j w �I �I \ Sy w U) •r{ en O v ro�•rl 0 v4.JN ..0Z a3� 3 O �.0 cnfn.c.c<vva) 4) C 4) v) tin v 4J rov3c�•- Cwv ..c000a'wro v E+�Eiu] Cv 0a�ow Mendota Plaza. w < • 0 x � o ro O U) Z < • U 0 Mendota Plaza. N v it • -H v — U O 44 U) • • H .I to Z Z ca Z � cacc as O w r-- • (V `N • Z ✓ N•N3 • NU) O C1 Y 14' - 12' DRAWING A2 RECOVERY SYSTEM BUILDING AMOCO STATION #5317 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 10-68-330 DATE 5/31/90 PREPARED BY DSR/DD REVIEWED BY Delta Environmental J%A Consultants, Inc. 7 1.5' RAMP 3' RAMP INSULATED STEEL DOUBLE DOORS (2 — 3'-0" WIDE X 6`-8" HIGH) 12' 14' PLAN VIEW SIDE VIEW ALUMINUM CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT, 2" X 4" TRUSSED RDO^ — 4/12 PITCH FOR 40 LB./SQ. FOOT SNOW LOAD 1/2" C.D.X. SHEATHING 15 LB. FELT PAPER BLACK ASPHALT SHINGLES 1" X 6" FACE BOARD 12" OVERHANG 2" X 4" TOP CHORD 2" X 4" SORT LING WEBS ALUMINUM SOFFIT 8" LAP/ALUMINUM SIDING SHEATHING GROUND LEVEL R-38 PAPERBACK INSULATION DOUBLE 2" X 4" TOP PLATES 5/8" TYPE X SHEETROCK R-11 PAPERBACK INSULATION 2" X 4" X 8' STUDS 16" O.C. 5/B" ANCHOR BOLTS 32" O.C. 2" X 4" SILL PLATE (TREATED) SILL INSULATION 12" HIGI-. SOLID RAISED UP (AROUND ENTIRE PERIMETER 4" REINFORCED CONCRETE PAD OF CONCRETE PAD) 2" X 4" BOTTOM CORD DOUBLE LAYER 5/8" TYPE X SHEETROCK 3,000 PSI CONCRETE FOOTER I I I I 1 l 1 1 1 1 I! i 1 1 I I I l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 T 1 1 i ii I i I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I i 1 1 I ! ! I 1 1 1 I I 1 DOUBLE 2" X 12" HEADERS 2" X 4" TRIMMER STUDS NORTH SIDE VIEW 8' DRAWING Al TREATMENT SYSTEM ENCLOSURE AMOCO STATION #5317 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 10-88-330 PREPARED BY' DSR/DD DATE 5/31/90 I REVIEWED BY Delta EnvIronmsntoi ConauItanta. Inc. 11 I. • - n kfl t - - -- •-1 -t - - -- --;• . I F I 1 1.1, • - R 1 c`. i --_ •:::, i 1 ...:?: :,-., r i --, , , ,-) ,..y. 1 •,.. ,-, •••-• I ,..''' --A , 1 I \ 1 I d I ;H' 4 \ I' tu rrir,,,::::21,_ii.171,77ri;ru_LIT- • r fG'7 T) - I I 0 kl‘: •••• ar • 41,trrirf; tv,1 7'1 \15. -4 L 5 .! —1 I •r - • , `,..r.'",.......100.10.40494/010110.11111,111.1.1.00.......T.....,...,..W10`t+,0f.0.0..e.,...K.O...10,..WRIN0100.V6011tat..ramarAkwarf.alleto,,,,Ana0,00”........10114.1.1411.1114•11111DOVIIIMMIONINIAMOIMilldtRalle0011.1.3...M........01,....110140.00011*.••14040.0.0.01,611.0tIPIV...11.11.0•1141111911111,104.....111111001.1•11111111011111111111.111 ------------z--t,-,-.--t . r 1• , • • . . . ii1;11 1-'•• ' (.• -,., -••-) 77.1 . rz, rz, r• T.,. 1c3 0 2 \-• . /1 • 1 r I '0 , > ---‘ ./.. I --- -4 c• 5.z....•:_c1C1) -‹ •''': •t' 1/ X. r." !,.., ,•., . ,..,",:: n ,...,... -- - . ,..• -_,. C.-.) ,2 -2 --:---'--.IN • - 1-,•-•- ,:„:,..--- r•--) b 0 • v -i • ;•••••... ;•••••„ ,....„ 4c•-, ,,,.'- rz r IF•.7., In --. -r_ r .c.7.1. .1/45 r - ' - • --, ,/ fa c.- - ,...., ,..... N ,-,---i ••,-, ..,. ,,• vs, A 1 ‘ 0 • • t.r, .r. •-•:,'-`1t .,\...., (.•:`• '7. % , •-,•••'.1 , • 17.1. •(,,,.._\ x.I17,I). 1•-i ' ' ;I ,, .. •"!1,,,r! .....!, , , 1 , ,, • ',- 71 --.'.) - r \ i Tz a_t'''-.• /N• 1•\ !L - , • 4•44aparmamaaParxrawalasa,aaraamiaaaaaat........,,,,,,,,,,,a...,..,40540.41faveawaraarawiloardiaailaNaa5•43,4.1.4140/14140/04"10004,14,P1/0***•••IPPP•04**044•4404410/01PPT,4.01, • . ••` L L , N 5 • e I, vi,,, trt ••,!,4 Pt - 4.,: gr. X G I. .4.5/ 171.5.PV114.5, '7, • 1,1.; 0.7 ;;;••• z Cl (V 55. \ \ r.... -...-.........,.......,..............„......L.,..... •.‹,.... 1 ' : - • • .. •1 1 /1r'- • ! •:!•'!, ••• I \ . :-.. i .\\\\•,.: — r ----77---i. 'I' cs-:, ''', • , ,.. 1z. - ' — • • " • • • '• . 1 . I ' \'\I " • , ",• (;•,- I ' ' •, I 1 P • V.,.. /-***-N, 1”,I ) C • r ' . - n, LI I • I _1....._ • •} •:. . ....,...... z): -7-7--,,L1 ' • , I , (,-) • I (I;) hi' _,.. ,. i•••!..11- . ! ''.) ----1'-' . . • •f! 1,2 •.--.) i •••-rli - ..7 __. ...- .,_, F\--) i tirt- 0 t3 i -i,- '.,!. r • ' ' -9 -.r- , : • ,,..., . -o "?. C 44111,i104,4 01461.40,0104.010.1.111i1.4011.11461.M104...14.101+004000.t. t.r 0 ...........00.0................u..m.,q0r L,.) ' • .., >-•, , I 7. , . 0 I Q I ---"-- i 4 tl Ilk. 1 ..I., 6`. i ),- .. --"---- .•. • . • • • 0 1 : \ • -.I / A r .. .N.p, . ,-- ; , -!---7--• -:- /11, .... ! r ---4-:.•-• e . 1 • '• • • /. • , 1 0 1•••••-4,- , • 1 ..41 • 14..) fl '10 Vs) • r .5•- P' fl I , .1 C • • • • • , / Is, • ,"•••,, /, .1c) ' ••‘•,, I • \ 1C, -C.)" • • • • \•,;\ JI f1,7.7"...111 . ; 1 r ,.---,-- ----- -... • --....,........: i ,I, . 1 " , • . ..11 / 'Iss `... 11 ,,`.,4: .,11 I \ III L `• . \ 1 II \ II,I I •• 1, I 1 . ,..4.-.-...........-. . • • ' C - - 0 - ".; 7r— r • ••• r • a t 4 6(544 0 it • Pk• f, • •;‘,- r sir a ;r:, • r.i Its 0 1 i t U ( ••••$9 •„, • 1 ....L) I -I\ 1 , 1 s.." -... • 5 s--; ; ---- 5 :-.• -; ..../N 1 r • ,. -5,-,0.4•; r I , .,. \ I 1 ,••,..,, i, r , •-•,,‘ cP 6, „I • . C-1••••• • r 1 ,a,., › „ 1 r•- v ),- c.) :: k,_„.. i.c,,,,, Ij • 4,2 -I• I•r• .•-•5-.. . . t7 - .,▪ '• I t. V r . , .15,5 I i5.1 • c...1 Q1 (I1 •IX \ C75. :i.,, ” • l ' 1 P r, s.e. ?%, ' ) r -,,i, "P !';`, :. 1.1 7.:.• _.'.4 , I/1 I ry., '.1'- -0. 4 . 1 -> - 1 tc:u' In I C c- • -.‘ .... C::-} it i•C''' sj: ' 17'. .. _ I l. • r- - • r‘ rreir 1 • ,-2, le 6 . l• P '• r I ''"3 • •‘,1 • 1 1 .544544,,,,P.11.0.5IP,41445,55.4155,4.-:,544,4440145.454.4.4.44,144,41,5.104.154•PlI5 41-40944414444414414P1,, `• 1." 14 *Ck CA X G I. .4.5/ 171.5.PV114.5, '7, • 1,1.; 0.7 ;;;••• z Cl (V 55. \ \ r.... -...-.........,.......,..............„......L.,..... •.‹,.... 1 ' : - • • .. •1 1 /1r'- • ! •:!•'!, ••• I \ . :-.. i .\\\\•,.: — r ----77---i. 'I' cs-:, ''', • , ,.. 1z. - ' — • • " • • • '• . 1 . I ' \'\I " • , ",• (;•,- I ' ' •, I 1 P • V.,.. /-***-N, 1”,I ) C • r ' . - n, LI I • I _1....._ • •} •:. . ....,...... z): -7-7--,,L1 ' • , I , (,-) • I (I;) hi' _,.. ,. i•••!..11- . ! ''.) ----1'-' . . • •f! 1,2 •.--.) i •••-rli - ..7 __. ...- .,_, F\--) i tirt- 0 t3 i -i,- '.,!. r • ' ' -9 -.r- , : • ,,..., . -o "?. C 44111,i104,4 01461.40,0104.010.1.111i1.4011.11461.M104...14.101+004000.t. t.r 0 ...........00.0................u..m.,q0r L,.) ' • .., >-•, , I 7. , . 0 I Q I ---"-- i 4 tl Ilk. 1 ..I., 6`. i ),- .. --"---- .•. • . • • • 0 1 : \ • -.I / A r .. .N.p, . ,-- ; , -!---7--• -:- /11, .... ! r ---4-:.•-• e . 1 • '• • • /. • , 1 0 1•••••-4,- , • 1 ..41 • 14..) fl '10 Vs) • r .5•- P' fl I , .1 C • • • • • , / Is, • ,"•••,, /, .1c) ' ••‘•,, I • \ 1C, -C.)" • • • • \•,;\ JI f1,7.7"...111 . ; 1 r ,.---,-- ----- -... • --....,........: i ,I, . 1 " , • . ..11 / 'Iss `... 11 ,,`.,4: .,11 I \ III L `• . \ 1 II \ II,I I •• 1, I 1 . ,..4.-.-...........-. . • • ' C - - 0 - ".; 7r— r • ••• r • a t 4 6(544 0 it • Pk• f, • •;‘,- r sir a ;r:, • r.i Its 0 1 i t U ( ••••$9 •„, • 1 ....L) I -I\ 1 , 1 s.." -... • 5 s--; ; ---- 5 :-.• -; ..../N 1 r • ,. -5,-,0.4•; r I , .,. \ I 1 ,••,..,, i, r , •-•,,‘ cP 6, „I • . C-1••••• • r 1 ,a,., › „ 1 r•- v ),- c.) :: k,_„.. i.c,,,,, Ij • 4,2 -I• I•r• .•-•5-.. . . t7 - .,▪ '• I t. V r . , .15,5 I i5.1 • c...1 Q1 (I1 •IX \ C75. :i.,, ” • l ' 1 P r, s.e. ?%, ' ) r -,,i, "P !';`, :. 1.1 7.:.• _.'.4 , I/1 I ry., '.1'- -0. 4 . 1 -> - 1 tc:u' In I C c- • -.‘ .... C::-} it i•C''' sj: ' 17'. .. _ I l. • r- - • r‘ rreir 1 • ,-2, le 6 . l• P '• r I ''"3 • •‘,1 • 1 1 .544544,,,,P.11.0.5IP,41445,55.4155,4.-:,544,4440145.454.4.4.44,144,41,5.104.154•PlI5 41-40944414444414414P1,, `• 1." ATTACHMENT A 2 3 O O � w < O C_ GRASS 4, MW -8 MW -4• MW -3 RW MW -2 \-,_ a 4. BURIED FUEL & BURIED WASTE OIL TANKS 7--�8—• GASOUNE `oa TANKS �- - - J MW -5 0 — :: 4J ^ Q r� i� .___. ❑ L3J ❑ LEGEND: • SOIL BORING LOCATIONS Ofe MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS • PROPOSED RECOVERY WELL LOCATION 0 MW- 6 NORTFf 50 SCALE FEET a r McDONALDS PARKING NEW TANK L_LOCATION B-1• MW -9 Pwcoa..ssa Res.oq wt era% 1.41 144 L06M'1 ON /.1 MW7 PARKING FIGURE 3 LOCATION OF PROPOSED RECOVERY WELL AMOCO SERVICE STATION =.3317 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA a mecr No. I mamma) 8Y 10-88-330 I PMB/LSOME 4Delta 1-90REVIEWED Emi al Consultants. 9-n- 1190 i ity s� 4 • x; tl Dvo.-/tr Corntr o% fre/on Dok,/. Conn, y C• r. M. v. a!'1. i t T n,, !.renin /•at r% cy•s^ c% !'Ar/.o c f ?: .7=-• 4 ,:: 0 _3. N 0 z 0 a a MATCH LINE i!'' IIIiD WITAINFOM [ii tiilliur!f givaffilltin NiNifiiNiiIFIIF MATCH LINE D r m it cn O 6 r z 07-1740 m co f3 W OG p a) r 3 3 o (5c� •-••o 3 N V F 2 94- r r 8 Q I I 3 n 14IN It; g.p Ya No~'i a Pi 6 a V P PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT LOCATION MAP 30 15' EL STREET i_. 1 TOP OF CURB II/2I WEAR' 2" BASE 6"CL. 5- J CRUSHED ROCK IQ NORTH E. WEST SIDE OF STREET WA;tRM41N MN - B 618 C.Ex G. MARK 9 WITH 4.4 W O C ID 4 z W U 5 W U, W a La W O UTILITY EAS£hENT G 4' COPPER SERVICE Br ST PA11- 'WATER TYPICA- WHEN POSSIBLE STUBS WILL CONNECT TO MANHOLE. SEE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS MARK END OF WATER E. SEWER SERVICES WITH 4, 4 s TAIL. t _END OF STUB IO BELOW TOP OF CURB ——_� 1 -. e yaR 2D PVC SANITARY SERVICE TYPICAL STREET SECTION PROJECT MAP MENDOTA HTS. RD. LOT H / ��° „ ey, 2 �' O 0 ////% �' �i\ ry ' r O A j Q S COy A L2 cr O Z All Applicable Federal, State and Local Laws and Ordinances Will Be Complied With in the Construction of this Project. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Dakota County, Minn MENDOTA WOODS SUBDIVISION 1 SANITARY SEWER- 560' 8" PVC, 4 MANHOLES WATERMAIN- 550' 8" DIP, 2 HYDRANTS STORM SEWER- 390' 12" RCP BITUMINOUS STREET 6L B6I8 C EAG - 560' BEFORE EXCAVATION CIIECK Ii' r1Li'1'•i 1.0CA'1'IGJ' IlOPIIER STATE ON CALL 45.1 -fl I(' HAS: Northern States Power 27,1-4444 ELECTRICAL,: Northern States Power i'-4144 TELEPHONE: Northwestern Bell Dial "0" Ank Opc rator for len i th 2 145 :AIC TV: r' nfl1 �! 1 n 292-01.18 r_ int, :� • l _ a I'I ..,tin i 2512-6Ei kH'7 I ;I )OTA TIII •- .'.VtmerA !iE11_L'Y:: . !F1.1<1_:4 '..:T. GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS The 1988Edition of the Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Highway Construction" Shall Govern INDEX TO DRAWINGS SHEET No. TITLE OF SHEET SAW CUT 81 REMOVE EXIS—ING BIT., RESTORE AS SPECIFIED LOT II SEWER & WATER SERVICES yea I.) TITLE BLOCK, PROJECT & LOCATION MAPS, DETAILS 2.) UTILITY & STREET LAYOUT 3.) CROSS SECTIONS I Hereby Certify That This Plan Was Prepared By Me Or Under My Direct Supervision And That I Am A. Duly Registered Professional Engineer Under The Laws Of i ie State Of Minnesota. -no/90 19976 DATE REGISTRATION No. i1T'v ENGINEER Approved by the Mendota- Heights City Council MAYOR DATE. JOB: 8922 IMP: 89 PROD: 07 SHEET NO. I OF 3 Pfzep 111 Ex! 11 1rA ll- /.oNNe -t 6,P\,/G -ro "ti ' 1 ' , y /- 1 • • • 0 r r `l o -v ir 6 A • &: \ b - "yrs,.; -1 I —A t L _1 0 0 f -' •4 �{ .'t-1 .a 4 h • A • Y• 1 l r \ pp ao R w 1 c M Ic ‘L DUNDEE NURSERY& LANDSCAPE CO.1 \\\ G = 0 4 6) e 0 s_ V+0 )1 Ti Ch My 4. w • • • as • +dam �t�t_A 4p pK V E 24, St 2 ott .NO a SEP ,1 me N PIaRT�}tAiJ{3 TN 247, 07 I N. t a 46 c'r•,RK1N5Q'5Q?s_ rd • N 3 N r r ,r Fi 7C. 74 r m -;� N z m a. CLEvi £0000 Nh, d -M 6 Nor • yy C -{OW ZO Z cor C)m9x, P r g - y Z Z 1 S 0 m S m 0) �Z Ci 'c -n.000-<,10> rD5mm �2 L�C-97\� r� m"'n'<Z9ZDm v A N m m D m D- m rtDm c _ _ m A t n f T N t 1 r N N O 1 N- !In W O a NGmC vv vv mmmmmmm m b0000mwwmmmmn" -4-I-4-+- ge a M TYPICAL STALL DIMENSION: 9'x 20' N arae •0 -4 - T N Om° <--KD Dp rim N !p.< CO Po 6W T 6 rrM rrrn ooh oo i''9ry awl — oinr �co�,Q 23Nmmrn moo NNID c 000 N 0 cncori 11 11...c TTKp N 071 l • C AI ‘..F. -:!-•,41.1:11)-7; 1'1 rill111''' J1.14"-1.1, --' .;i1/4. ' .11 't ;r1. }'I lilt 1 . •L f..1,11.1 ii . , 111,1 I i gr.1%-l:Crd :;,;,,,, 4.-i t1111i14,. CI!,'i,. :,:li„ '. H -;:iili,'',Itr.„;.0111-rtr li• II' 1111jM‘ 9 ;Ir 1 Ill li . j I 1 lirl'hil Ali 1 I I 1 11' 46' I. lij. . I iII 11 iiir,,1,1.,:,, , Ilia la; iimii., :, ,, ju IFFF F gib.' I Lilli ' ' I'll i I.. iIFl Iri iF 4 S 7r- tIl r r NOLLVAIrJ In It N -- 0- %7 14_ F F 9 - CD Z.(11 CP o • a s ai a+7 M° :57 etitu �< 7 " z~� Ui U, p LM 0 0 lis rn 0 —I 0 i i i to rn U o —1 +'Lb a NfO4 3