The URL can be used to link to this page

1997-07-15�� 1� Call to Order �-2� Roll Call ri3� Agenda Adoption / CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 15, 1997- 7:30 P.M. �w�� , ,N` .. k'^s° �� "� ,�f p�, J• �►,lla`'S ti�� 'U ��v �"^i � � r� � � � �� C4. Approval of May 20, June 17 (copies submitted to Council on July 1. If copies are needed, please give Kim a call) and July 1 Minutes. (�5/ Consent Calendar a. b. c. d. e. f. 0 h k. I . m. n. Acknowledgment of the June Treasurer's Report. Acknowledgment of the June Fire Department Report. Acknowledge Receipt of Correspondence regarding Deer Hunt. Acknowledge Receipt of Correspondence from Dakota County Capital. Acknowledge Receipt of Correspondence from the Metropolitan Airports Commission. Approval of Permanent Appointment to the Position of Administrative Secretary/Utility Clerk. Approval of Permanent Appointment to the Position of Engineering Secretary. Approval of RESOLUT/ON NO. 97-34 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 95, PROJECT 4. Authorization to Appropriate a$2,000 Contingency from the City Council Budget for Celebrate Mendota Heights Parks Expenses. Adoption of ORD/NANCENO. 314 - AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING PARKING ON THE EAST SIDE OF DODD ROAD (T.H. 149); BEGINNING AT THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF THE OLD FIRE HALL SITE (2144 DODD ROAD) TO THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE AT 2150 DODD ROAD. Authorization to Advertise for Bids for the 1997 Seal Coating Project. Approval of Fire Hall Roof Final Payments. Approval of the List of Contractors. Approval of the List of Claims. (Available Monday) End of Consent Calendar �ublic Co�ments a. View Video Tape of Highlights of NDC4 Coverage of Mendota Heights (Approximately 5 Minutes) .,. . ; �. a. Recognition of Girl Scout Gold Award Recipients. 8. Unfinished and New Business � Discuss Building Permit Request - Tempco. , b� D'scuss Roseville Properties Centre Pointe Development Change. I/ c Concept Approval of Improvements to North Kensington Park. d�Consideration of Bid Award - Pine Creek Available Monda . � t v) �`-� Consideration of Proposed Tree Ordinance. f. Discuss Invitation to Attend Planning Commission Cellular/PCS Workshop on Tuesday, July 22, 1997. • � •�� -� 12. Adjourn to Joint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop on Tuesday, July 22, 1997. (This adjournment only applies if three or more Councilmembers plan on' attending the workshop). E Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administration at 452-1850 with requests. .� Page No. 1 Juiy 1 199� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKQTA CQUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, Ju1y l, 1997 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Cauncil, City of Mendota Heights, Minnesata was held at 7:30 o'clack p.m. at City Ha11, 1 l0I Victaria Curve, Menda#a Heights, Minnesota. _ � � ` Mayar Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The fallowing members were present: Mayor Mertensotta, Councilmembers Huber, Krebsbach and Smith. Cauncilmember Kach had notified the Council that she would be absent. Councilmember Krebsbach had notified Council she would be late and arrived at 7:�0 p.m. AGENDA ADOPT`IC}N Councilmember Huber moved adoption of the revised agenda for the meeting. Cauncilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 APPR4VAL OF N�IlvtJTES Cauncil tabled action an the minutes af the May 20, 1997 and June 17 meeting. CONSENT CALEND.A.R Councilrnembex Huber moved approval of the cansent calendar for the meeting, revised to move item k, Tempco, to the regular agenda, along with authorization for execution of any necessary documents - contained therein. a. Acknawiedgment of the minutes of the June 14, 1997 Planning Cammissian meeting minutes. b. Acknowledgment of the Building Activity report for June. c. Acknowledgment of carrespondence regarding MCTO transit redesign. d. Acknowledgment of the unapproved minutes of the June 4, 1997 NDC4 conlmissian meeting. e. Acknowledgment af the Metropalitan Airport Comznission's 1996 Repart to the Public. Page No. 2 July 1 1997 f. Approval of the issuance of purchase orders to BDS Laundry Equipment and Dakota Plumbing & Heating, for $4,385 and $770 respectively, for the purchase and installation of a washing machine and associated plumbing for the Fire Department. g. Authorization for the purchase of a computer and backup equipment for the fire station for an amount not to exceed $3,500. h. Authorization to retain Blake Davis to prepare an appraisal for a trail easement over the Tom Thumb property in conjunction with the Dodd Road improvement project. i. Approval to use Municipal Development Network, Inc. to assist in preparation of the Tax Increment District annual reports, newspaper notice and submittal . j. Rejection of a request to participate in the MPRS Cooperation Program for affirmative action. k. Adoption of Resolution No. 97-29, "A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY APPROVAL OF MNDOT AGREEMENT NO. 76514," (EVP). 1. Approval of the probationary appointrnent of Police Officer Jeff Piotraschke to the position of Sergeant effective July 1, 1997. m. Approval of the List of contractor licenses dated July 1,1997 and attached hereto. n. Approval of the List of Claims dated July 1,1997 and totaling $237,218.28. Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 RECESS A recess was called at 8:10 due to severe weather conditions and loss of electrical power. The meeting was reconvened in the upper level lobby at 8:45 p.m. TEMPCO Council acknowledged a memo from Code Enforcement Officer Berg regarding a request from Tempco Manufacturing for approval of a building permit for exterior building modifications at its facility Page No. 3 July 1 1997 at 2475 Highway 55. Representatives from Tempco were present for the discussion. Tempco representatives discussed with Council what can be done architecturally to improve the appeazance of the addition and city participation in that azchitectural review. Discussion and action on the issue was tabled to July 15. CABLE SYSTEM EQUIPMENT Ms. Judy Skeie-Voss was present to inform Council on two pieces of equipment which aze available to the city. A video visualizer, which allows full color projection of images via a large screen television monitor, and a video projector, which allows lazge screen display of video, still-life and computer generated images. She explained that the visualizer will remain at the city for use by city staff or for city related purposes, and that the video projector is available for check- out from NDCTV to all NDC4 member cities. She stated that she will research the costs for wiring for a monitor in the City Hall lobby. Ms. Skeie-Voss informed Council that she had hoped to run a video tape of highlights of NDC4 coverage of Mendota Heights, but would be unable to do so because of the lack of electrical power. She expressed appreciation to Council for the city's support for Insight 7. BID AWARD, T.H. 110 Council acknowledged a memo from Engineer Mogan along with FRONTAGE ROAD a ta.bulation of bids received for the T.H. 110 South Frontage Road and Pine Creek Estates improvements. Engineer Mogan explained that the two projects can be separated but the way the bid document was structured, the low bid was based on the combined cost of the projects. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that if the Pine Creek Estates project is approved, $55,000 of the costs would have to be carried by the city until the Ridder property develops, and the city cannot do that. Engineer Mogan stated that the bid for Pine Creek Estates is $79,000 and the developer was anticipating an assessment of only $12,000 to $13,000 per lot, and two lots could be assessed and the city would carry the balance. He explained that it is a difficult situation because the groundwater is high and on-site systems aze not possible. He stated that the two Pine Creek Estates lots aze buildable now and the developer has expressed an interest in a third lot in the future. He informed Council that he does not know if the improvements costs � Page No. 4 July 1 1997 would come down if the project is delayed and combined with another project in the future. There was discussion over the possibility of splitting the Pine Creek and T.H. 110 projects. Engineer Mogan stated that when the superblock does develop, the proposed project is the best way to serve the area with utilities. He also informed Council that the developer has someone who wants to buy one of the lots. Mayor Mertensotto responded that the does not think there is any justification for the city to carry $50,000 of the cost plus overhead. He pointed out that the city has no obligation to open lots for development and then carry the cost . He stated that most cities would require the developer to pay the entire cost if he wants the improvements. Councilmember Krebsbach stated that this is a major decision because it brings sewer in to develop the superblock and it is bundled with the frontage road. Councilmember Huber stated that installing the improvements will not make the superblock develop faster or slower, because the Ridders control the property. He asked if any of the cost is driven by the fact that there is oversizing to serve the superblock or if the developer of Pine Creek can come back and ask that the project be re-bid to serve only his land. Engineer Mogan responded that there is a practical difficulty, because for the developer to serve the lots he would need a minimum 4" service to get service into the sanitary sewer and the sewer is not at an appropriate elevation for a 4" service. He explained that any service that was constructed across Dodd would have to be augured across Dodd and that cost will not go away. Councilmember Krebsbach stated that she is against the proposal �"'`Q because it has a lazger impact than just to serve the lot split. C��'"`'��- 5 `'�'�' '�f Councilmember Smith raised the issue that the Ridders would have to pay the interest on the unassessed cost in the future and that would be more expensive than any increase in the project costs. It was the consensus to split the project to do the frontage road and not award the contract for Pine Creek Estates. :� Page No. 5 July 1 1997 Attorney Hart stated that it must be understood by the contractor that the Council is not going to take any action on Pine Creek Estates and that it must be made clear to the contractor that his bid for $79,000 is still on the table. Councilmember Huber moved adoption of Resolution No. 97-30, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, AND STREET IMPROVE- MENTS TO SERVE PINE CREEK ESTATES, JOB NO. 9304, IMP. NO. 93-1 & T.H. 110 S. FRONTAGE RD, JOB NO. 9610, IMP. NO. 96-2, S.P. 1918-98, AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR T.H. 110 S. FRONTAGE ROAD," awarding the frontage road portion of the contract conditioned that the Pine Creek Estates bid be left open for a period of at least 45 days, at which time the city can elect to either delay the 45 day deadline or accept or reject the project. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 97-13, DALSETH Council acknowledged an application from Mr. Phil Dalseth for a wetlands pemut to allow construction of a three season porch and deck to within 22 feet of the edge of a ravine at the rear of his property at 664 Maple Pazk Drive. Council also acknowledged related staff reports. Mr. Dalseth was present for the discussion. Mr. Dalseth explai.ned that he is proposing to add a 166 square foot three season porch to home, with a walkway around it, and a deck to the north of the porch. It was noted that letters of consent have been submitted by the adjoining property owners. Councilmember Smith moved adoption of Resolution No. 97-31, "A RESOLUTION GRANTING A WETLANDS PERMIT TO THE DALSETHS FOR A HOME ADDITION." Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 97-15, LENTZ Council acknowledged an application from Mr. Tom Lentz for a five foot front yard setback variance to allow expansion of his existing garage at 2236 Apache Street. Council also acknowledged associated staff reports. Mr. Lentz was present for the discussion. A, Page No. 6 July 1 1997 Mr. Lentz informed Council that he is planning to construct a garage and family room addition. He reviewed the plans for Council, explaining that the existing garage would be extended forward six feet and there would be a single garage addition to the existing double gazage. Councilmember Smith pointed out that this is a unique situation because the configuration of the house allows the proposed expansion without sideyazd setback variances and the applicant is only requesting a five foot front yard setback variance for a six foot building extension. She stated that Council has allowed variances to extend double garages in the past and in this case, the applicant can extend the garage and add a single garage and family room without any additional variances and without any impact on the sideyazd. She asked Mr. Lentz if the exterior finish will match the existing siding on the home. Mr. Lentz responded that he will match the addition to the existing finish as closely as possible at the present time and that he plans to do some additional brick work on the front of the house and hopes to put some kind of maintenance free siding on the entire structure at some time in the future. Councilmember Krebsbach pointed out that Mr. Lentz has received the written approvals of eleven neighbors. Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption of Resolution No. 97- 32, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FRONT-YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR 2236 APACHE STREET FOR A GARAGE ADDITION," with the condition that the exterior materials match the existing home. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 97-14, SCHAEFER Council acknowledged an application from Mr. Lou Schaefer, 1669 Lilac Lane, for lot subdivision to allow a reconfiguration of his back properry line. Council also acknowledged related staff reports. Mr. Schaefer was present for the discussion. Mr. Schaefer explained the proposal for Council, stating that he would like to acquire 1,440 squaze feet of property from his neighbor (Lot 23, Block 1, Tilsen Highland Heights Plat 2) to add to his property. He explained that Lot 23 is slightly under the required 15,000 squaze foot lot size now and will be smaller, but that his lot, Page No. 7 July 1 1997 which is also under the required minimum, will exceed 15,000 squaze feet. He informed Council that if the lot reconfiguration is approved, he plans to construct a six foot tall wooden fence on the new property line to enclose his entire back yard for his existing swimming pool. There was discussion over the Planning Commission's request that NIr. Schaefer donate a portion of the front of his lot to the city for Lilac Lane street right-of-way. Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption of Resolution No. 97- 33, "A RESOLUTION GRANTING AN APPROVAL TO RECONFIGURE THE LOT LINE BETWEEN 1669 LILAC LANE AND 1675 LILAC LANE," subject to the applicant providing the ciiy with an easement, if necessary, for road maintenance and snow storage. Councilmember Huber seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 97-17, LJNITED Council acknowledged an application from the Mendota. Heights CHURCH OF CHRIST United Church of Christ for lot reconfiguration to allow the church to transfer ownership of 1.97 acres of land to the Dodge Nature Center (DNC). Council also acknowledged associated staff reports. Mr. Cazl Baumeister was present on behalf of the church. Mayor Mertensotto suggested that Dodge Nature Center give the church some land so that the church has better access to its new hall. He asked felt that the nature center should remove an existing foundation and the old barn that is on its property. Mr. Baumeister responded that it would be nice to have an additional 20 or thirty feet. He stated that the church has a is a fairly wide now that is all on nature center property and that the church has discussed with the nature center the possibility of acquiring that property. The DNC director had informed them that the DNC's five year plan is to construct a visitor center and put the pazking lot right next to the church's lot to minimize problems. He further stated that he has received pressure from members of the congregation to get some property from DNC, but at this point the two acres the church hopes to sell to DNC will provide needed funding which is needed because construction costs on the church expansion are going up faster than money can be raised. He explained that the church does not need the property, which is not suitable for parking, and the DNC does need it. He stated that he would not mind that removal of the barn be a Page No. 8 July 1 1997 condition of city approval because that is already planned by DNC and if there is any way to word the approval to encourage DNC to give the church some property he would also appreciate it, but he would not want anything to happen that would result in termination of the sale of properly to DNC. Mayor Mertensotto suggested that the matter be continued for at least thirty days because Council is concerned that the church does not have public access on its own property and there is property available to the east that would give access to the existing frontage road. He further stated that there is an old foundation and a barn on the nature center properiy that serve no purpose and Council would like them addressed. After discussion, Councilmember Huber moved to continue the matter to August 5 to allow the church representatives to discuss Council's concerns with the nature center. Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 PLANNIl�iG WORKSHOP Council acknowledged a memo from Assistant Hollister regarding an invitation to attend the Planning Commission cellular/PCS workshop on July 22. Councilmember Smith indicated that she would attend the workshop but would need a substitute to attend the MASAC meeting that evening. Mayor Mertensotto stated that he would attend the MASAC meeting. He informed Council that an adjourned or special meeting would need to be called if more than two Council members plan to attend the workshop, and he asked that the Council members be prepazed at the July 15 meeting to indicate whether they plan to attend the workshop. AIR NOISE Council discussed a draft letter from Mayor Mertensotto to the MAC P&E Committee. Councilmember Smith moved to direct the Mayor to forward the revised letter to the P&E Committee. AUDIT Council acknowledged receipt of the city's Annual Financial Statement for 1996. Page No. 9 July 1 1997 ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmember Huber moved that the meeting be adjourned. Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 TIlVIE OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:30 o'clock P.M. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk ATTEST: Chazles E. Mertensotto Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TREASURER'S REPORT, JUNE 1997 DAKOTA, INC. Checking Account 1.05% Savings Account 2.15% C.D. Rep. 3.00% Collaterai - Bonds Gov't. Guar. CHEROKEE STATE BANK Saving Cert. 8/17/97 @ 3.63% Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. HL Bk 6.08% (PRU) FHL Bk 7.05% (PRU) FHL Bk 6.18% 9/25/98 opt 97 (PRU) LaSalle Bank CD 5 1/2/7% FHLMC 7.23% 12/97 FBS 6.40% FNMA 6.18% 12/99-96 FHL Mtg. Pool 8% (PRU) FMLC 7% Mtg. Pool (PRU) PAC FMLC 6 1/4% Mtg. Pool (PRU) FNMA 6% Pool (PRU) FHLMC 6% Pooi @ 101.4375 (PRU) FNMA (1994 Pool) 6 1/2% (PRU) U.S. Treasury Money Mkt. (FBS) Gov't. Securities Fund Zero Cpn T.Bds 7.9% - 2011 (J&M) PRU Gov't Sec Fd TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE Funds Available 12/31/96 Funds Available 6/30/96 Rates Money Market ane Bank 2.85% June FBS 5.23% BALANCE $28,568.10 $603.83 0.00 $29,171.93 $500,OOO.QO $100,000.00 $13,952.59 $13,952.59 $500,000.00 $100,000.00 COLLATERAL $600,000.00 $600,000.00 Value 6/30/97�est� $500,000.00 $247,500.00 $500,000.00 $95,000.00 $500,008.00 $500,008.00 $212,332.22 $431,983.65 $355,665.09 $503,180.34 $198,149.52 $263,522.30 �$324,865.02 � $1,002,470.00 $197,530.00 $433.00 $5,222,999.44 $7,185,466.62 $5,874,839.70 $500,000.00 $250,000.00 $500,000.00 $95,000.00 $502,000.00 $500,000.00 $210,000.00 $415,000.00 $350,000.00 $475,000.00 $195, 000.00 $250,000.00 $890,000.00 $2,489,000.00 $310,000.00 $430.00 FIRE CALLS NO. MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT JUNE 1997 MONTHLY REPORT 97107 - 97138 NUMBEROFCALLS rIRE ALARMS DISPATCHED: ACTUAL FIRES Structure - MH Commercial Structure - MH Residential Structure - Contract Areas Vehicle - MH Vehicle - Contract Areas Grass/Brush/No Value MH Grass/Brush/No Value Contract MEDICAL Assist Extrication HAZARDOUS SITUATION Spills/Leaks Arcing/Shorting Chemical Power Line Down FALSE ALARM Residential Malfunction Commercial Malfunction Unintentional - Commercial Unintentional - Residential Criminal GOOD INTENT Smoke Scare Steam Mistaken for Smoke Other MUTUAL AID TOTAL CALLS LOCATION OF FIRE ALARMS: MENDOTA HEIGHTS 2 2 MENDOTA 0 SUNFISH LAKE 3 - LILYDALE 6 OTHER 1 TOTAL 32 WORK PERFORMED HOURS FIRE CALLS 444.5 MEETINGS 7 3 DRILLS 1 0 8 WEEKLY CLEAN-UP 3 3 SPECIAL ACTIVITY 9 ADMINISTATIVE 0 1RE MARSHAL 6 6 , TOTALS 733.5 Nl1MBER 0 1 3 1 5 5 2 3 � 1 � 32 TO DATE 111 1 8 15 3 138 TO DATE 2106 398.5 800 172.5 340.5 0 387.5 4205 STRUCTURE CONTENTS 32 MISC. $10,000 $200 $700 TOTALS TO DATE $35,800 $1,200 $12,400 $»,000 $0 TOTAL MONTHLY FIRE LOSSES $10,000 $200 $700 FIRE LOSS TOTALS MENDOTA HEIGHTS ALL FIRES, ALLAREAS (MONTH) $10,900 $66,400 MEND. HTS.ONLY STRUCT/CONTENTS $29,700 MEND. HTS.ONLY MISCELLANEOUS $24,300 MEND. HTS. TOTAL LOSS TO DATE $54,000 BILLING FOR SERVICES AGENCY THIS MONTH TO DATE MN/DOT $ 0 MILW. RR $ 0 CNR RR $ 0 OTHERS: � LAST YEAR 132 1 9 6 0 148 LAST YEAR 2619 387.5 916 203 635.5 0 450.5 521 1 .5 $0 TOTALS: $0 $0 FIRE MARSHAL'S TIME FOR MONTH INSPECTIONS 35. 5 INVESTIGATIONS 0 RE-INSPECTION 2 MEEl1NGS ADMIN ISTRATION 2 6. 5 SPECIAL PRQIECTS 2 TOTAL 66 REMARKS: SEE OTHER SIDE FOR SYNOPSIS � , � .► SYN4PSIS June, 1997 FI]ftE C.ALLS The monEh of June has been our busiest month sa far with the Fire i}epartment responding to 32 calls bringing our total calls for the year at 138. Out of the 32 ca11s we responded ta approximately 14 that were false alarms which varied fram system malfunctions, ta testing alarm systems without notifying us, or power surges from storms. Most af aur other calls varied from a mi.nor electrical fire, to gas line leaks, vehicle fires and a roilover accident an June 25 in which an adult and child were injured and had to be transported by HealthEast to the hospital. On June 23 we resgonded to a frean leak from an air conditianer system at a single family dwelling, the homeowner experienced same minor effects and we ventilated the house using aur gas fan and positive pressure method af ventiiation. Probably the most serious cali came on June 18 at Riverwaad Apartmen�s. According to the report a fire had started in the control box of a dryer. The fire became large enaugh that we needed aur 1.-112" attach Iine to extta��ngnzsh it as well as substantial ventilation to remove smake. I7ollar loss was estimated at approximately $10,900. i 1 1:1 The monthiy driil consisted of an an-site inspection and pre-pian af our new senior apartment complex at 730 South Plaza Drive. We toured the building and became familiar with hydrant lacatians, stand pipe connections, the fire alarm system, and any potential evacuation problems as well as fire attack logistics. SQUAD DRILL The squad drill consisted of operation af the boat (2269) at Rogers Lake. All personnel took turns aperating and becoming familiar with the gurpases and equipment used on the baat. We also ran our porta-pump and demonstrated the ability to deliver a iarge amaunt of water, from pools or lakes when traditional water supplies are unavailable. 4� FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY WORK PERFORMANCE FOR JUNE 1997 S ecial activies included Safet Committee and Fire Prevention ' CALLS FOR MONTH FIRE FIRE FIRE PERCENT CLEAN MONTHLY GEN OFFICER SQUAD SPECIAL 32 CALLS CALL CALLS ATTENDED UP DRILL MTG MTG DRILL ACT. YEAR TO DATE ATTD HOURS ATTD THIS 1 2 2 2 2 1 138 MONTH MONTH YEAR YEAR HOURS HOURS HRS. HOURS HOURS HOURS HOURS Adrian, Ed 15 15 63 46% 1 2 2 2 Blaeser, Bret 11 11 75 54% 1 2 Brennan, Mike 3 3 23 17% Coates, Aaron 12 13 45 33% 1 2 2 2 Connoll , Marcus 5 5.5 60 43% 1 2 2 2 Coonan, Mike 15 15 49 36% 1 2 2 Dreelan, David 12 13 68 49% 1 2 2 3 2 1 Dreelan, Paul 9 10 47 34% 1 2 2 6 Husnik, Ted 6 6 34 25% 1 2 2 2 Katzenmaier, Ron 17 18 83 60% 1 2 2 2 Kaufmann, Mark 20 21.5 67 49% 2 Kilbur , Jim 15 16 69 50% 2 2 3 1 Kin sle , Ro 15 17 73 53% 1 2 2 3 2 4 Klarkowski, Walt 12 12 32 23% ; 1 2 2 2 La akko,John 21 21.5 93 67% � 1 2 2 1 Lerbs, Jamie 15 15 69 50% � � 1 2 2 2 Lowe, Geor e 24 25 89 64% 1 4 2 3 2 Maczko, John 9 10 56 41% 1 2 3 2 ' '3czko, Mike 16 16.5 62 45% 1 2 2 2 • .�cNamara, Rand 10 10 41 30% 1 2 2 2 Nelson, Gerald, Jr. 16 17.5 69 50% 1 2 2 2 Olund, Tom 11 11.5 45 33% 1 2 2 2 Oster, Tim 13 14 52 38% 1 2 2 2 Paton, Dave 10 10 51 37% 1 2 2 Perron Jim 15 16.5 59 43% 2 2 3 4 Perron, Kevin 11 10.5 52 38% i 1 2 2 2 Shields, Tom 10 11 45 33% � 1 2 2 Sk'erven, Gord 17 17 81 59% 1 2 2 2 Stein, Keith 22 23 94 68% 1 2 2 1 Stenhau , Jeff 9 8.5 53 38% i � 1 1 2 Weinzettel, Tom 10 9.5 43 31% I I 1 2 2 2 Weisenbur er, Ken 17 17 72 52% 1 2 2 1 Zwirn, Dick 5 4.5 57 41 % 1 i TOTAL FOR MONTH 444.5 TOTAL ATTENDED � 33 22 27 9.5 � 32 #DIV/0! 9 TOTAL FOR YEAR 2106 �TOTAL MAN HOURS I 33 44 54 19 64 0 9 THIS MONTH LAST MONTH LAST YEAR AVE. RUNS/MAN 13.38 XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX 'VE. MEN/RUN 13.38 12.22 17.37 � E% FOR YEAR 44 63 � 46.02 � 54.76 � � I It; I �' � 1 �t l CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO � July 1 1, 1997 T0: Mayor and City Council R FROM: Kevin Batchelder, City Administrator SUBJECT: Acknowledge Receipt of Correspondence regarding Deer Hunt DISCUSSION Attached please find a letter from Mr. Carl B. Drake, Jr., regarding the possibility of a deer hunt to be conducted in the fall of 1997. Mr. Drake has indicated that the majority of property owners in the area between Dodd Road, Delaware Avenue, Wentworth and Marie feel it is important to � thin the herd of deer. Mr. Drake has asked his eleven neighbors (please see ; attached list) to write the Council emphasizing their concern about this problem. Mr. Robert Ridder has written a letter expressing his support in conducting a deer hunt (please see attached letter). ACTION REQUIRED Acknowledge receipt of the letters sent by Mr. Drake and Mr. Ridder ' regarding the possibility of a deer hunt in the fall of 1997. f KLB:kkb � a � June 30, 1997 ; � "�3�s:.4.?,�� - ..t �l�+ j. o � 99� i ; `' �� :� �:�� 1 � 4�� 4��v ` Kevin Batchelder City Manager 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Batchelder: This letter is in answer to our telephone conversation concerning the possibility of a deer hunt to be conducted by the City in the fall of 1997. The majority of the property owners in the area between Dodd Road, Delaware Avenue, Wentworth and Marie feel it is very important to thin the herd of deer despite the survey done earlier by a professional consultant. Daily I have between 5-10 deer grazing in my back field and my neighbors are fed up with the overpopulation and destruction caused by S this herd. I have asked eleven of my neighbors to write you concerning this to emphasize their concern about this problem. Anything you can do to carry this plan to its conclusion would be much appreciated. Sincerely, �� ,�,t��t � Carl B. Drake, Jr. 1695 DelawareAvenue Saint Paul, MN 55118 eg cc: Mr. and Mrs. Robert Ridder 1744 Dodd Road St. Paul, MN 55118 Mr. and Mrs. Tim Ober 1707 Delaware Avenue St. Paul, MN 55118 Mx. and Mrs. Reynolds Guyer 654 Wentworth Avenue W. St. Paul, MN 55118 Mr. and Mrs. Jay Chadima 1651 Delaware Avenue St. Paul, MN 55118 Mr. and Mrs. John Murphy ' 650 Wentworth Avenue W. St. Paul, MN 55118 Dr. and Mrs. John McMahon 620 Wentworth Avenue W. St. Paul, MN 55118 Mr. and Mrs. Bruce Odlaug 1324 Laura Street St. Paul, MN 55118 Mr. and Mrs. Jack Sjoholm 1611 Delaware Avenue St. Paul, MN 55118 Mr. and Mrs. F. T. Weyerhaeuser 610 W. Wentworth Avenue St. Paul, NN ��118 Dr. and Mrs. Donald DeRauf 600 W. Wentworth Avenue St. Paul, MN 55118 Mr. and Mrs. Ken Bergmann 717 Stanwich Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55118 � � 2744 DppD ROAA � ST. PAU4 MIHN$spTA 5311$ •{612) 43A-�572 RqB� �, �� , ��l� J �.` (,�-ti, ��C �ib, J . S 7 I ��.r.�j f� �h � �"ti � �C �� ;� �� C� lJ�C,L-�l ,/�/ G`'�y"� ',7u/� �r� h--l' Q(. � �r %�'l� ` !"� G�.G�- �, �/ f� � /�c_ / h l�r� jJ D'�� l�fjcilQ.�-! , L?/.�,w�`'f,!> �� ot-"� f, K,c^GL iLUt 4, �i'�! �s�iJ �iL( �h'}� G' d.�-{ /t /jJ �� !��"'G.0 l �� fp f�j h � �'�.a� /�,�%`�lnb � t � � �%� � .�� c �1f.-�� . �✓ �,t,�' �� 1� a.+.. C�., i�'- C��t r� /D �'�GZti�-�1 ` � , Gr% f J. �,� �, �fi' � "r CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 1 1, 1997 T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin Batchelder, City Administrator � SUBJECT: Acknowledge Receipt of Correspondence from Dakota County Capital DISCUSSION Attached please find a letter from Mr. Scott Beckman, President of Dakota County Capital, informing the City that the Dakota County Capital (DCC) is "unofficially" open for business. Mr. Beckman informs the City that a Fund has been established as a Limited Liability Company and that nine organizations have invested 5325,000 in the Fund to provide gap and venture capital to promising Dakota County-based companies. Mr. Beckman welcomes any questions or comments from the City Council. ACTION REQUIRED Acknowledge receipt of correspondence from Dakota County Capital. KLB:kkb f �.; DAKOTA CouNrY CAPITAL _ _ � _ j .;; JUN l 2 �997 �. ' � �..:.�i��CT"� -------a - -w�-- Dakota County Capitai June 10, 1997 Board of Govemors Block, Steve Nonvest Banl: Minnesota, N. A. Hendricksot�, Ame Minnegasco I,arl:in, Mil:e Firstar Bank IvIinnesota, N. A. Lauer, Jeiry Dakota Electric Association Laumeyer, Doug Hampton.Bai�lc Lund, Linda Northem States Power Company McNamara, Toe semountNational Bank Peterl:a, Grego .ry Marquefte Bank,_ N. A. Stowell, Robert FustBank Kevin Batchelder City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Kevin, I'm pleased to inform you that Dakota County Capital (DCC) is "unofficially" open for business. The Fund has been established as a Limited Liability Company. Nine organizations have invested $325,000 in the Fund to provide gap and venture capital to promising Dakota County-based companies. Additional fundraising is underway. A nine-person Board of Governors is actively managing the affairs of the company. Member Control and Operating Agreements have been executed by the partner organizations. Investment Guidelines and Operating Procedures for the Fund have been approved. Further information on the Fund is attached. We're looking for investment opportunities. As a community and economic development professional, you may run across a business client who can utilize the services of Dakota County Capital. If you do, send them our way. DCC can be an active partner in helping you to grow or expand enterprises in your community. If you have any questions of desire further information, please contact me at the telephone number provided below. Si erel � Scott Bec an President encs. ,��, S _ ��l �"��j /�� r�a.�...t .�.L' C:��'�,-C�L� �l�U� k��.� ��.� �.�� z � �� L� C� ,y�,w�a�,,�� . �J ��S r ��, DAKOTA COUNTY CAPITAL� LLC 1300 145TH ST. ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 PHone: (612)423-8291 F,�x: (612)423-8780 E-�tA1L: SBECK@DAK.TEC.�IN.US , r 1' 1+ c` srt. . � �.- . . ,- �Ss. i • x ��-'�:� � DAKOTA`C4UNTY CAPITAL; `� �' �� ' '_r � ` LLC:� EXECU'TIVE SUMMARI' �CIF � : ,�,- , . � °.w:`;` � - . �. , ` ,,. � OFFERING STATEMENT � ,' �.��.. ° � . � i :' � . ' .. ...z;. . . ... �� _ > .r . . . .. .. _. ~;i' . " '.�r:'` ^ ��1� WHAT IS DAKdTA COUNTY CAPTTAL?� ' • . -`a I _' ,''. ., .:� �t^. . .. :,'t:.c; . , . .... _ . ..,s;;�.:,;z _ ...� �+;� .F ;1,: -�.J};-, �.The ' se �of D :�. `�' ,, .� v ;%�.x�, �? piirpo akota Caunry Capital, LLC is to � "•�`�=i:�"�s� ''support the forn�ation and eacpansion of qtiality` • -• ''� . ��r��h��busiztessand ob ��;�',.`:;x.,;f �.?.; 3 aPPart�utitiesinl7ako#acountyby - . � .�,�.��. � >.. .;x,.�.�:;�"; .. Y, � providing gap aziii.equity financirig services. °�:��':s . r:Y 'a��- . ..f N ..t}vi'•'� a 44'2. � _` } p � -_ ' ✓Ls � �, . ;;�;t 5=?y��4�„'��' �r • �.. n� ' { ; � . 5 a��. =ki ,-h:�, _;:,� �. -� ,t.,� .� DCC malces investnients in start-np or ernergiiigffoi-'" *;;,,{'t,`,'':"S'i�.i-, ,l "y:,w •x. . ��r_ry ,'.,f��.>:W°i: profit bvsinesses for whom a small infusion of capital ' :;�x� _ "�;+�,»; `� ��f' ma2ces a targe`difference iri their priispects for'�".<' , : �` �, ,�b.�°�:.�+�7;.-u?^; ;wj" , .:a:�Y��".� s�;a., ..�:.:ur, , .a.«.=.rlY••7: *u �+, -��.�:�k;i��j++'� Sll(:C.f'SS. - . . :.. " . }' n ��.. _,., j -�}�•" :•, ,, ' • .: :'37 i�� . :g' �vt.Z„�' • • n'y y '��t :�. •' ' _� • �• . Y�` S �j r v � W�� ;��=��'�'py i GOAIS OF THF DAKOTA COUNTY �h' �`S~�4rt �`;%�• �`�: �';.��v+��{��,'��:'',?��`•7y�A+:"�:CAPITAI.� �.0 ; x�r i.�-',.,,�'x`,:t�,�i':ii �� 3'>�:?-a.t;.�";:.�3"� " r,S'e'T�..�Y-��'� �l��'�iF�i,ief;�i'.X. - «'�` MY=' •�`�:3:fYy,"bi��'S.`._,%�i,�b;:;4.'F:S:;:��:i.7...'�'..:' ' �;,m. rf=•[t-'Y+el�� "� .,.. .s., �.a'k't , ` . . �' `a}; . . � �:� ., . .. � - :.. .. , � :• .� � � Y 't �'4l... ,� ��':��;�`. 1�,��'7To promote �nomic revitalizatian,�development,kr�ft� r�.; ?�, ,:��; �., x� and creation af q'nality jobs for . Daka�ta Coan[y, �. ,.�y v. i�,:3�s��lr�`'�1"�'±'.da' ,.:a:......�};a...:'Y�."`� ...i�z... ,c=... •a�`S: ,. . ,. .t ,._ .r'„tY ' +'s�5 `, . ..�.R.`;f. f",.:.r't�.:"'"� * �F..e, :. � .. � �-... �� ,�_ �, :�;1> �^'.,"i,$'d.3c'y.'.#Fa� :tly assist aic@'promote small busiriess ta z„� Coun�:.b�,P�� . . :r. -�...:* �� ; : � -� � ;: �' Y Proviciing financing�for busmess ^�.: � n c+-;... tRa-x ,.,,�,,.t u. merit and eYpansioit �:� =�''�s>t#��.�:,,":� ��y �.,�� s ��x:.� - . -r.��i��9�!.��`a'2�.nf �+-•,il��ty#�'� �••i,�r�,nt:i..ia.'i"'r �y<. .'.�a...��7yYi.. 3,:i��•:.;.'+j�y�,s:.�4 �. .a',�!�; - ETANAIYSI3,� `�;'`sFw�,��;.:.��;,��'-�`3•:. 1s �;,;,:x-- ,., Y .,��,:. x;::. � �� :-h,.. ;,s ;; ia,.,��F�� w .jxaj�i,�:�i,'aLc� r =�''�"��—�`��';f�iih,;_�,x3; �� ,ty;.rxtT,s"':'•,t.' kc,.-t� e'��it's�.,..;,�,�xs;s�%;,k'�••r�r;,y�»R mergence ofsmall,businesses as primary,»,,• � of ectinomac�and.7��ob giowth�;�:��'':�`��t��i 4.,�-.;. ��,y�",Z}r�?�?lX�.iai�: t�= �t.i�y.�,��y '��`3.ri;,��'.???j�:�� ai+�i��y,+Z�k'Tt','' ,'i:e>�y;'",_�..; �a»�.%y.:'f�6•vld}.....�=':i.:s„a.•;;'�f�+,.��,'s.::s�;,-'S.`"f�'.+�X'4' l tr,end �indicates increasingly common use of S £C0118IFllC C�CVC�ODIItCIIt �001 :.'`::.�::<s�; ;ii+o"��yK4;�,'� .,i � « .'.h �.3 .. x; .,� . "� �z� � '} ��+�''i''sw;:a ;Institution Progiam prdvides matching funds to CDC`s • ,y j� . � �* ;x,rt.,,,. m ;•x«•.'y�„1;.�3";£.p��'µ5.. ;f'�°�:�a�;.�r�#.i,1�:�4.�;f.,ifE��'��.f`:�c��a,�'S:G:->«'_^:';k"&il�t'.�.';�`t�i_:r� :=.��h��,l�� •• �3.. �,;, �..:, ,. _. . ,, .. . . ;: . ° ', �;�: - . �� .. ... �.:,:,�;rs: ,_. ...4; ��'��y,;=<. •.2992 Dakota�Cou�iip�Ecanorciic Devetagment c;:-°,' � +y,x4� ��q.�,'.;y,�. :,� n.,.yr . �. w .. ��,e;�n� '' : ��:h;�'.` "ParMerstup Cominunity Needs Assessmerit� ` s� •rr:"� �KX;-`v�,,'�y7,.�.?'tj�''a;' -y:.,. .., :>�..,- ".,�.�i.�iir F�h'•%:.`.:ii::�.'--"k 3 ��`: C..>i•,,ii" :'l.. w ..� . .. :� = '"'" ��' ''""+i�Success ofAnaka Couiity Capi#ai Fund inlmar2cet' - ' , ' :;;„u' �Y:;7��i�, � x _ � sw.�? � '.� '; with similar profile to Dakata County .° °. .. .' ' , : Y'. �:�' `� .'=��Large technically-tiained p�ol of entrepreneurs `� ' - . •' -. -•" af%cted by downsizing (3M, Unisys, Cray) . . ^'� 3'� � . .. . ... � . . .-• I.ocal gap financing identi�ed by rnany Dakota �' � Coanty cities as deveiogment glan prioriEy FUNDTNG ELIGIBII,ITY CRITERIA Businesses located in Dakota County can receive consideration. - DCC invests in "value-added" companies. These utclude agribusiness, biameciicat, camputer hardware and software, and manufacturing firms, among others. __ .,. ..:. .•.:.:,,,�: r,;. ,,�,;� Distributors, franchisers, retailerrs, reskaurateurs, and whaIesaie operatars do nat quaiiiy fo �tius service. INYESTMENT GUIDELINES • . . - ''}�r . : . ... Type of Invesqnents. DCC makes two types of - �Y4J4i1 .�t3. s a} ".2� rt. �!: at. . _ . y' r y_.e,wi � .:. •" �• ,. ". ,.o �i',r:.�.i),'S yr,T ' i : .U,. :i t :i.: i' 1� _:.r : , �' 1. Gap Financing is pravided to comganies ais a�.:;w ,� . . subordixtated btisiness Ioan, corporate hand, ar .. ,,,, debenture "Ivt'ast of DCC's inveshiieiit portfolio is in ' .. the Gap Fiiiaitcing category.``�.' °'"� ` � � 7' :., ..d `•.;g;� �` .l�tiS '.W�c� . - ::,n 2��..ei. a :I:.K.:;,i�w:.ii�:( ri��'�.iC�i._� , •✓•:.ys?: ', ,x �.�i . . . ..: , ' . 2. Ventuie Capital is used to gurchase coinmisn or _. , preferred stock ui a ��naliriumbe'r'oPcom...•y:e"s..::�>;�. �<, , L,��.a•.> �i; :,..�r;,wa c,.t.+,._ �� .y._:;.., ..�1 :7p�;si,9 ..r,� ,:. a' �. _.,: ;. ;•,�s,,,�'tif';` �r' ' • � �{ ;t�}t..`.4{I'„`•"•. `:'e�'tC�vt4 i�'":s�'S'zCE?:�.•�i � • Eiigible Uses. Appropriate uses af fittids may include '� ' accounts receivable, equipmenf, fac�ility :�ezpai4s7oq ;��:'� �� land�azzii biuld`uig;��egal rexperisespyMrt,v,eritures,.' �' �� :�.:1' ?°��U'��i ri..; �r- F ++.o-.cr�- "t" r�r.Y <,t ;#iµ�'.�� : inventary, iiiartceting, and working ca ital:� -�'•� .� w., �i;,'= . , .a 'hi,qi {:'.� � � pS•l.rw xj.} �C.r'�„�y':.4' .:b+�,��:. �+..��,.., '. L� t 'ki ^ . '' r.L:'"� :�1.� '� �:.i��~�r� .. -i `Ir.r.fi`.k';'n; ��"y. �� 1. ' -:�:."a t� • `�-- -- �-" r , _. _ _ . _ ia' :"+I'��x'`�, 'C'�k ��- ., r . � �.��i""equest betiveen S25,OOQ ancl Sl( �K,.Yt.i;r��!'}y,`',�`�,�y�+;.�'::;��`:t;<�� f��t.�:2 ;�'t�r� ck r �ar �sw j,,;., ,.:�'�} i�.i�%�iiti�'�' �aSCCUT�C(� '�� Securit � DCC"1s usiially ', .c2;CB.7r..f'.': i� �:r� a�A�vaoa.s�r:z _�� +_x pasitiori or ownersiuP perrentage i,ti;i? sei. E C:. h% x+&'n(t>�':_ iri.'hs?t#.�'� . . :owners�"Ienders, or investors.��, � ,�o ti<< 'vk n^'+Y� MI_`r.`�:x.�i' t4 �y+� ,�t:'n:Y'�, y �:� A. 4 ,5, i 'i � '�`�''. , {, • n.�. h �'t'Sft.'�,• �y;. �`; �r`.��`ae�. �'-'�'':,'f:?`yiy�'aret.�`€"-�sc4i°.r4•ti '-;�.".''`,�iitBFCS�.1�� iiiV�,SttiiC2it ffitC2'2'C: �� a"peiceiitages sie nego6able DCC ;�g t rrrs�r'sx j . ,�w�—s c;. re •: ,��' TBtiiTri �23120ILS 1}HSCti QII t18I8 �f. �: al;ji2�P �vlw'g"Y_s"':pl.T�rt,Q,1'.�atige. ... pM ��:t'the public purpases served by the .,. : x. .� : �,� � .axr:-_ -.-� �level of,capi�taal risk it assumes 2r� � � . aY6 ,, i1la�K'1��l��}�yY°.3+:b�+i�{�';ar�lr ::�:_ �iiYestai$ 4 ti,_ t.. i'. �-^.a.'} ,,+T.."':'1. iw.:�.��,,:r�;,�e>:�:;�`„��;:;s��:��,tr;� ��Y,��.tiu r >f}•`�;:tti'�'__r.!tt_'. . ..��Jv', ..? �'.'._.:3'ilti:._ � ;',, T � }.?�; �.: r �: �ac '. . .W , '. . .1:.�, � zy`;: �: ,F�},". . C'� , ' ' . �it: _:=�i,- ,v� ;;. •'z �sf�,, �H}'.'. F.'.i'':`q :2 a ��~+ :�+*.�`;,t�J.= ,, ;;,, ; �::�.��-."' 1Y�i�'P '... relation to`the ` } ` - '-"�W �'""�"`�-'�`#":^�'."�`':. Iife af t'he asset being financeil: �. .:. '+IN { i�i�'s^`S1d='i�;�,�F. � � s• v: .•,v,�w� � :y,"��.vsx;;:��i::- �- 'Invest�nent agreements inelude time=specife e�at �'' � '_.• ,--4f.:i,,:,:i> ..=yYs`t�:;:�z. sSr .,,{ ..kl.-;:,u'.,x»:f.L'f�`�tD:"_ sEza�eg�es. �r - , � ;r. : . ,z.:. ° � � . ,...,tu.;�"�y�T._ <s;�.>c., `v,:r`w�{ii#i.u't,?�,'?iFi",:, Eaui�Requirements..DCC wiil tygically requiref � '- . � > :jii. .. about S2 of non-DCC fimds for each 5I investeci by the Fund, In most cases, at least 5% of the total . • proj�t fim�ing'req�� from aiI saurces miast be �� . ._ �� . .. . .. , .�r awner equity. � y c�rrr nvv�sTa�zs AT s3zs,aoo Dakota E2ec#ric Association � , First Banlc Community Tkvelopment � Corparation Firstar Bank Hampton Bank Marquette Bank Minnegasco Narthern States Power Company Norwest Bank Rosemount Natianal Bank •- , .�L - �;t .. COST IS 525,000 PER VOTING SHARE COMMUNTTY & INVESTOR BENEFITS , �• {ienerates profii ' ' Enhances �rnmunity's abiiity hasten deveiapment •� • and job creation by providing gap financing to worthy businesses .. . . Centralizes community development financing activities in one identifiable unit serving as a resource for both investors and commwuty ' Achieves impact by consolidating resources and focusing on community needs related to investor and cort�munity strategic objectives Controls and efficiently manages transaction costs assaciatecl with publiclgrivate financing apgraaches to community development "' . '� ' ' ' ' � �;r Creates�a`clear identity'for investars as interested in �' community growth"' -. "r . .. " , . .. �- .. . . , :-�.c:;•:v:_.��`�•` �.'_�s ,..�-. _.. . Creates a collaborative leadership capacity for .,,, ., executing strategic or catalytic community proj�ts which wouid not ottienvise acciir'", : K','. -- -� ^ ....rJ3� :2 �y:� -� •T �'i�� , • - . .• Bank participatian in DCC .addresses many _ - Community Reinvestinent'Aet=(CRA) eriteria ' ' ' . a{,- "�.itStl...;a::= �e.'.'' _ asr.`x. � . ... .. _ '� ,_ x : • :: -�'__�,�::" _ . _ - � INV�?STMENT ACCflUN'TING ` '� . , ._ .. :>5,. w,1`� if;.��3.C, x�r;�',.�• ,:a,..`-.�' .. • .. .._ . .. �. I.�' �+. � � ...`-e ::;..s.�:ai�n` t�sa :. � . , i':. . ,, , . � � ' _.. $ank investments in`CI}C's are exc'eptioris ta - normaliy silowable bank activities governed by OCC Interpretive Ruling 7.7480 and by OCC Bulletin 94- 66 dated I�ecember 13,� 1994. ` Under the C3CC .� program, a national Uank may cany the inveshnent as an asset and is perriiissible under the eigiith '�� paragraPh of I2 USC 24, under these conditians: The praject is predominantty civic in nature; - Investmeni dca�n't exceed 2% of cagitai and surplus and aggregate investment in such projects don`t excced 5% af capital and surplus; CDC investments are accounted for on bank books under other assets. The impact on an ogerating statement is determined by the period, if any, over which the asset might be amortized. Many banks cany such investments an the baaks at cast and do not amortize the asset. F'UND MANAGER: DAKOTA COUNTY ECON.- DEYELUPMENT PARTNERSiiIP . , "' . . + . � ,`_�, � - `� • , . , . - The Dakota Caunty Ecanomic Developrnent ;;�; �: :�_, = Partnership is a nan-prafit ar�aniza#ian initiated by �� the Dakota County Private Industry Council in 1991: .^ Its mission is to cultivate a healthy enviranment for ; existing and new businesses and to nurture quaIity .;�-' •. jab opporhmities for Dakota County residents. -..; �r.:.' _ . . - . .. _ . -.>_ . . .� :.:`�. 1996-1997 Pra�am of Work Hi h�ligt� . . '�, Business Atimction Usirrg New Technology _� �i : Y• ;.� � GIS Ca �mmittee heips deveiop integrated�mutii-�y �s '`�� - . :;�-�+�_' agency data management systetn LL:�:>��,a Cammunity and Econamic Develapment .'-c�" �,:;, � �� - Professionals market caunty as a single econornic,��,�� entity using the Internet . • - - `� �r � : .: � j�,aMy .. . �' S r i .:, ti' ,�..r. _,.: . .�r :,. . �._.._4'' . ��,��.x�+;`-x��• �.;:i�'. • :. . �_ +�a'�i::��'?:�.yu"�� Business Creatfon`,;i� ' - ;: �i.,,t, ::�.er }��.�,� �:�:� u, . x � � '��.:�.,z`= �'w-�t� . � ,.., �__ a > ... .<.,.,.a „��s?%;;' • =s Enterprise Facilita6on Committee to assist in hiririg';w�=�� two local sinalLbusiness consuttants ,� �•: r. . es �n��;!`"��i��=;�`� .�t'�.� _ . s< =a;c+::.- . " �.!+ir `"�, 5�2� ,�+. t� }y^y y�-��;,.�:.;e•� �} �r� ,� �,:h'YNrt:�:r'1�Giy.�^S.xc�;f,y .N:=' ,.r..:�,I��2'�^��„a.r1,+'t%<i�,�,.i�7h`1��y� Finance Committee launches Dakota Caun Ca rtal�" �,��. LI.c .�.. :. - -- - :;::��ty�:�:P�°�..��°� rf�;� - �{. . .. � :�a:4y. �.,�:F}4a'.r�t�{�. Jy'�,�. , � 4�''• K��{ k• �`� � ri ' + � �'a-'n'�i,!^ ` "*i �. .�.�,s`.,�f-.�`�"y �.�.il'.. it��:� Business Reten#cvn and F_zpansion � .�:-�: �",�,.�y�: " -t ` . . �..�,w.-• `,.r'F=, �;�{'`�k . - � ` :�;f , "�:�- .r�.� ;;�a`a 'i`t�;azr'M'r'S-rr �.;Y = _.=; i;Ms'�.: ��:,��Y:'ti=�6��k��:w;,. Technology Committee develops pro .competitive h,�;� X� .:; � recommetida#ions in r nse `� � +� �- espa ta coun'sel� from l�acai �� =• .. ri.` _,< '"Ac , r . .:. °`r'c! -t• °..�-'��. ;i'; bnsine.sses�;,��`��.�;.Y �r%c�ss - _ ��,:=:.•::�� ^� �z �:s,�:�� %�i��:J, �^� qfi.$"_'"i "'` •:'. -�.> ".�t��t�4r:3��i'�`rL�;�s�>�,4,��:..,n' t � � , x '�ii �}1�:'-".�.lo":.:�53fi•':'p•�T�:l'N*t�'�Y'� �f'+*p';� yf^_'� �. �..,� y �, In I994,.the Parhiiership was recognized with a�j�� .��-� ; National Association of Coimties Ackaevemerit �:ward �,�?' . ,, ...f - . . «. - .: x :x,��.g�-3, , . .n. �, 1 �.::�' far bruiging Partneis together,.develoging a:.=:�4��w�4,��; j:,. comprehensive economic pian, and building lan'g-°��,„�;,., �;- term commitments to work caoperatively to achieve a� �- cammon ecanoinic vision in the County. _ Tn 1995, ihe�? , group was honored by a Partnership Minnesota '� , Caoperative Pubtic Service Award for excellence in, �;� intergovernmental relations. , , .. , _. • �r , FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT, • �. , Scatt Beckman, President . • . y . � . Dakota County Capital, LLC ,, � 13QQ 145th Street . • . Rosemount, MN SSOb8 Phone (612) 423-8291 FAX (612) 423-$780 , � . ; • E-mail: sbeck@dak.tec.mn.us ,, - � >,�,.;.,-'..,�r�Y.w. yr�..s+a._ �.ru�cc,�cy•�t�t nx�as�.ez� --- ;-�_._____. ..... �.. ," . . ..,�..L. ....,, :_Y,r{'?e"1�L,_.... ''"'�: . _ . _____.. . 4, - :.m��r.�iMimr� n:.•L� — . _. _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ rru��irw "' ..� . Who Do I Talk To? �ontact one of the lenders for further in- �ormation about DCC: n � Steve Black, Vice President Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. Phone (612) 830-7059 Mike Larkin, Business Lender Firstar Bank Minnesota, N.A: Phone (612) 890-8500 Doug Laumeyer, Commercial Loan Officer Hampton Bank Phane {612) 43T-7760 Joe McNamara, Vice President Rosemount Natianal Bank Phone {612} 423-50Q0 Gregory Peterka, President Marquette Bank, N.A. t�akeville Phone (612) 469-2165 Robert Stawell, Vice President First Bank Phone (612) 435-3223 Scott 8ec�cman, President Dakata County Capital, LLC Phone {612} 423-8291 Frequently Asked Questions �Abaut Gap and Equ'rEy Financing �' . � , � 'l, . , ' . F� • Whatls'Dako'ta�CountyCapital?F :r: ��- ;`�.�.A�>a.��fiY'n '" .H .�a. ♦i•vEi'.I�� .a ,t• . • Who are tlie{inve�,sttars?" • : �� ;�,. . , °. . , - � . �. �i �`•��i��Y'.�_s;ro'�'.i.t� �f,lyll.„c' �."� • Who is'elig�ble for DCC financing?_; .. `, � �, =�ti=-'`�.x.' r�!*. `,.i,`.%�'..:i .r.;. ; � . . • How'does'�itworK7'�`�',�:��;�,;`-,x,.y,.;�:,�;:;,.>;��-� . . � t��r �,..., :�•+. n.�f� <S',�:`� - . . .� • What'ar`e�your fur'ding terrris?. ,� ;, . , . • . 9 . . "Y•.'•n�{�5.�_�,e.y�«l�'a£xRja;i,^ x•+. . • �/Vh{} d41 �ta�k t0�: x ' : •, : �:��.T �I�Yc: `s... ii•�:. ..�� ' . �:' .•�I: "a K� �;J��'':� ..`��.+��`-�''$: , , i . � ^� . �.,, _. ' �' , S.s �'tt '. .�i; :"p. `. .. .<t=:. :':s,� I , .d `- , . � � • � .it �1 : � � f . . �, F,� �. ,..r ;�,.:�; ,:f�. ..�;� ��s' I1 t ��', �� - a . , . _ . . .� y �✓r ., F��Y�• i I.,k „ �. � „ li S4y,� . , ... ...+. . .. . . . . . • �,.�, � , � . ., - r .- 1, ; , . •1, . , . ,�.-,, " . ' . .. -• , .� - � . . ,:' . �„w . . � Z)'.arroT�► . � ,.'- Coiinrrr.: • . �r`'i�Ar. .. . �, - .. , , . ti '7 DAKOTA C4UNTX CAPITALr LLC 1300 145th Street East • Rosemourit, MN 65068 Phone : (612) 423=8291 FAX (612} 423-9706 . e-mail: sbeck<ddak.tec.mn.us ,,r. . ,., , ,....' . � � Gap and Equity Flnancing , , ;: r �Ur �1��IY1�SS � �i�a Y/ ; :. �.,', •�Y . �,,_±.� ti,;,.. y-,� � . • , .' :,,; �%. r:. - ��B �.-j ,. �°•r43 � `- '�i� �''� �� .4+„�r�% 2' �� 4;'t',,``,`''`�✓� `\\ . . +t '`�'✓ � k : `t '�� , ` . , ' ~"'K�[„ 11�� .a �,i�Nl.7.., 11•i9G40N37U :A:��"'j� \4 ti. � � •�.,.-,�i�,•.��. ..�-• �� ; : �1%� ��:if�!r2tii�t... .. ,. , � . ,� ��,. � � T' � ...i a.,. . .\ ,, ,� 1 ::� S; �� t �{;�lF Jt ' t•� f : '+�i'�,2��' �''y ��`4l'j �;z�,Y ��"+t ` o• � "��i Lw �4 � y • ,� �""�.'`�Ma,'��'/,`1 �� t{[�.1,�' :•'.>�. , � ti� ��VY •�� .r ri � +� / � �� ``y ,�I�SE ?2��p� 4 /��`I. � • +a s ! r �* • : � ! � �,"a,� �' DAKOTA COUNTY �,�PI7'A� � 0 DAKOTA COtTNTY CAPITAL, LLC 13Q0145th Street East • Rosemount, MN 55068 � � ' Whai is Dakota Counfy Capital? Dakota County Capi#a1, I.LC supparts the formation anti expansion of qua(ity �usinesses in Dakota County by providing gap and equity financing to firms for whom a small infusion of capi#al makes a large difference in their prospects for success. Who is eligible for DCC Financing? Businesses iocated in Dakota Caunty can receive cansidera#on. � DCC lnvests tn "value-added" companles. 7hese include agrlkausiness, biamedical, computer hardware and software, and . manufacturing firms, amang others, . Distributors, franchisers, retailers, restauranteurs, and whalesale operatars do not qualify ior this service. • Who are the Invesfors? • Dakota Electric Association • First Bank Community Development Corporation � � * Firstar Bank Mfnnesota, N,A. � " • Hamptan Bank • Marquette Bank N.A. • Minnegasco • Narthern States Power Company • Norwest Bank Minnesota, N,A. • Rosemount National Bank , Haw Does it ZNoxk? - " ' . z ,. ' �.. . , ' � ^ DGC fosters economic growth in a way that maximizes canvehtional private sector financial resources.:•!n most DCC projects, a private sector lender will provide most of the financfng for a project. !n situations where a lender requires more equity or security than a company is able ta pravide, the DCC wili work with the iender and cornpany to find ways to fiil the funding "gap." in some cases, companies working with the DCC are unable ta secure any #inancing �from conventional private sector sources. DCC will consider partnering wiih the owner or other equiry • investors to provide some of the financing a company needs to achieve its potential. . .. � . . `;s, , . � F - . _ s:�., -. ,, .. ; �:-:.;< ,:: . - .�;r:-. . � . • , _ � .r:.'..y�Y'`;;�{�i ` . : �'� ,�; . ; , • ; ;;,. �; . � . � �, " : ,s .,;.��..:;,`� ;r: � . � '> , y. ,, w=.,.�+,�a,, - _ . .. . . . . :;. .. . ' � Jw�Y _ +�' _ L " -' • ,- '� r < . ,x. . . .. � . �! 3ry: . ,. : - , • .a.{ ' ' ' , i— _ ... . ;: ,„ _ . ,,.: �� =_� . �, . ... : ' _ - ; �=�"LAKUlA;�;` , , • '- `. t°.`a;�'� ";'" ; �� xs, '�";`sR��.,. �OL�Y:�:�::� � .,<�,� ...., • :,.�.-;; . •,'�`:�,.�,:Ft �.:.��,.;. = � � . . _� C'��:nr�Ai`�' = "=�' - . � . , . ' ,. ` ' >t�.�._�;..: . • ' r' 'i : �.'r�Yt �f:`> � :c:: . - - �.• � �� , � , ' � r� . , . �' ,- �� ' • �. �_. . A + What are the funding terms? �y� of Investments. DCC makes two types of ' investments: 1. Gap Financing is provided to companies as a subordinated business loan, corporate bond, ar debenture, Most of OCCs investment portfolio is in the Gap Financing categary. 2. Venture Capi#al is used ta purchase Comman and preferred stock in a small number af compan9es. Eligible Uses. Appropriate uses of funds may include accounts receivabie, equipment, faci�iry expansion, land and building; lega( expenses, expart ventures, iC1V�tltO(}J, marketing, and working c�pit�i. �mount. While there are no minimum and maximum funding amourits, most appiicants to the DCC will request between $25,000 and $100,000. Seculj,�, DCC is usuaE{y secured by a 2nd or 3rd lien pasitiort or ownership percentage relative to other owners, isnders, or investars. jpter�st, DCC investment interest rates or owner- ship percentages are negot`iabie. DCC estabiishes its return expectations based on balanced vaivations af the publ�c purposes served by the Investment and the level of capital rislc it assumes relative to senior investors. . �,. Maturity of investments must be reasonable in relation to the life of the asset being financed. Investment agreements inciude time-specific exik strategies. �ui y Reauirements. DCC wil( typicaliy require about $2 af non-DCC funds far each $1 invested by the Fund. !n most cases, at least 5% of the tatal project funding requested fram all sources must be owner equity. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �� July 1 1, 1997 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Kim Blaeser, Senior Secretar� SUBJECT: Acknowledge Receipt of Correspondence from the Metropolitan Airports Commission DISCUSSION Attached please find a response from Traci Erickson of the Metropolitan Airports Commission regarding a letter sent from City Administrator Batchelder to MAC Chairman Grieve. The March 3, 1997 letter from City Administrator Batchelder informed Chairman Grieve of an incident related to misinformation given out when Councilmember Smith called the MAC Air Noise Hotline. ACTION REQUIRED Acknowledge receipt of the correspondence sent by Traci Erickson of the Metropolitan Airports Commission. Staff welcomes additional direction from the City Council regarding this matter. � _>pT 4 S��yj� 41' ° *� , oT �" 9g 'l[� ji '� �InppP�9�O METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSI^"T Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport 6040 - 28th Avenue South • Minneapolis, MN 55450-2799 Phone (612) 726-8100 • Fax (612) 726-5296 Mr. Kevin L. Batchelder City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 1101 �ctoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Batchelder: June 24, 1997 I am writing in response to the letter addressed to Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Chairman Grieve, dated March 3, 1997. The letter cited inappropriate complaint-handling behavior and misinformation from a MAC Noise Phone Clerk. The statement "anything within the zip code of 55120 was fair game for jet noise" was made. This remark is false. Out to three miles, the 29L Localizer is the southern boundary of the corridor with a heading of 090° as the operational constraint to the North. Obser�tions indicate that rarely are operations further North then a 095° heading. MAC staff, and FAA Air Traffic Control Tower (ATC'1� personnel, monitor corridor compliance monthly. MAC continues to recommend implementation of procedures that will benefit surrounding communities, by placing reasonable restrictions relative to aircraft overflights eliminating some of the noise impacts on neighborhoods. MAC has enjoyed a good working relationship with the City of Mendota Heights, and looks forward to future successes together. After confronting. the MAC Noise Phone Clerk, and explaining the seriousness of telling the public inconect information, the MAC Noise Phone Clerk was susgended without pay for three working days. The job of a MAC Noise Phone Clerk is to accurately communicate Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport information, allow people to vent frustration, and log complaints. The Metropolitan Airgorts Commission appreciates your concern over this matter, and will work to avoid such matters in the future. If you have any further stions please call me at 725-6328. Sincerely,� � , r ^ �� • ��..,/ ci �nckson SupL�visor, Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs (ANSP) The Metropolitan Airports Commission is an affirmative action employer. Reliever Airports: AIRLAKE • ANOKA COUNTY/BLAINE • CRYSTAL • FLYING CLOUD • LAKE ELMO • SAINT PAUL DOWNTOWN CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 3, 1997 TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administrator FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson�,��S City Clerk SUBJECT: Permanent Appointment of Linda Shipton INFORMATION On July 16, 1996, Linda Shipton was granted a probationary promotion to the position of Administration/Utility Secretary. Linda's will complete her probationary period on July 15. DISCUSSION The primary responsibility of the Administration/LTtility Secretary is to calculate and process sanitary and storm sewer utility accounts. Over the past year, Linda has leamed the utility billing procedures well and has processed four quarterly billings without any problems. She has also performed secretarial duties for the Treasurer, Fire Marshal, City Clerk and others as needed. Linda has learned a variety of other responsibilities which are a part of her job, including issuing peddler/transient merchant licenses and processing liquor license applications. In addition, Linda was very helpful in the election process, voluntarily working extra hours and taking on additional responsibilities. Linda Shipton has performed well as the Administration/Utility Secretary during her probationary period. I am confident that she will continue to learn and grow in the position, and that she will continue to be a valued member of the city staff. RECOMMENDATION I recommend that Linda Shipton be granted permanent appointment to the Administration/LTtility Secretary position and that she be advanced to Step D, Level X of the city's salary matrix, effective on July 16, 1997. ACTION RE UQ IRED If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass a motion to grant permanent appointment status to Linda Shipton as Administration/LTtility Secretary, effective on July 16, 1997. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 3, 1997 TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administrator FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson�t,�,5 City Clerk SUBJECT: Permanent Appointment of Nancy Bauer INFORMATION On July 16, 1996, Nancy Bauer was granted a probationary lateral transfer to the position of Engineering Secretary. She was also given the designation of Deputy City Clerk. Nancy will complete her probationary period on July 15. DISCUSSION Over the past year, Nancy has performed well as the Engineering Secretary. She has learned how to prepare assessment rolls and engineering billings and has become an integral part of the engineering team. She has also learned the responsibilities associated with her role as the secretary to the fire department. As Deputy Clerk, Nancy took on the significant responsibility of assisting me in prepari.ng for the 1996 elections, and did an excellent job. Nancy Bauer has performed well as the Engineering Secretary, and has done an excellent job as my deputy. During the ten years that Nancy has been with the city, she has always been a conscientious and dedicated employee. I am confident that she will continue to be an asset to both the engineering departrnent and to the city. RECOMMENDATION I recommend that Nancy Bauer be granted permanent appointment to the Engineering Secretary position effective on July 16, 1997. ACTION REOUIRED If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass a motion to grant permanent appointment sta.tus to Nancy Bauer as Engineering Secretary, effective on July 16, 1997. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS II � July 9, 1997 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Marc M. Mogan, Civil Engineer �`^S "'� SUBJECT: Wentworth Watermain Job No. 9611 Improvement No. 95, Project No. 4 DISCUSSION: The contract work for the Wentworth Watermain project has been completed, inspected, approved and is ready for final payment (this will start the one year guarantee period). Total contract costs for this project were $185,589.95 not including engineering, easements and overhead costs. � � �u� u� • � I recommend Council accept the project and approve the fmal payment of $3,731.40 to Brown and Cris of Lakeville, Minnesota. If Council concurs with the recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 97- , RESOLIJTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IlVIPROVEMENT NO. 95 PROJECT NO. 4 :r CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 97- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IlVIPROVEMENT NO. 95 PROJECT NO. 4 WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Mendota Heights on April 22, 1996, Brown and Cris of Lakeville, Minnesota has satisfactorily completed the improvement of watermain improvements to serve the area known as Wentworth Avenue (Improvement No. 95-4, Project No. 9611) in accordance with such contract. NOW THEREFORE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved; and BY IT FiJRTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the fmal payment on such contract in the amount of $3,731.40, taking the contractor's receipt in full. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 15th day of July, 1997. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By ' Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 10, 1997 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Kim Blaeser, Senior Secre�� SUBJECT: Sixth Annual Celebrate Mendota Heights Parks! Contingency Planning L�7.G��1��iIi1 I have been making great progress in planning the Sixth Annual Celebrate Mendota Heights Parks! event which is scheduled for August 16, 1997. Many events have been scheduled which include the ever popular Teddy Bear Band, Wiggle, Jiggle and Jam, the Jupiter Jump moonwalk, jugglers and magicians. Several new items have been scheduled such as a petting zoo and a special basketball/sound system event. Other items of interest include clowns, balloons and face painting. As done in years past, I am relying on donations and volunteer support from the community to help make the event successful. I am receiving support from various City Departments which include the Fire Department and Public Works Department along with local businesses, residents and various City Officials. Fund raising efforts are underway and advertising for the celebration has begun. For the past five years, I have been able to rely on the City Council for seed money in order to reserve music acts and pay deposits on rental equipment that is needed. In the past donations have been able to pay for nearly all the costs and it is the intent to do so again this year. I am proposing that the City Council authorize expenditures of up to $2,000 from the City Council budget for contingency purposes with the intent that donations will reimburse all expenditures. ACTION REQUIRED Consider authorizing 52,000 for contingency purposes for the Sixth Annual Celebrate Mendota Heights Parks! event to be held on Saturday, August 16, 1997. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 10, 1997 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Guy Kullander, Engineering Technician � � SUBJECT: No Parking Area - Old Fire Hall Site DISCUSSION: The City Council has determined that certain improvements be made at the former site of the City Fire Hall (2144 Dodd Road). These improvements were to include the installation of a boundary fence, turf restoration and the elimination of inappropriate parking of vehicles on the site. RECOMiV�NDATION: I recommend prohibiting parking on the east side of Dodd Road (T.H. 149) adjacent to the west property line of the Old Fire Hall Site (2144 Dodd Road). (Please see attached map). ACTION REOUIRED: If City Council wishes to implement the recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting Ordinance No. , AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING PARKING ON THE EAST SIDE OF DODD ROAD (T.H. 149); BEGINNING AT THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF THE OLD FIRE HAI�L SITE (2144 DODD ROAD) TO THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE AT 2150 DODD ROAD. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING PARKING ON THE EAST SIDE OF DODD ROAD (T.H. 149); BEGINNING AT THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF THE OLD FIRE HALL SITE (2144 DODD ROAD) TO THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE AT 2150 DODD ROAD. SECTION 1. No person shall park or leave standing any motor vehicle on the east side of Dodd Road (T.H. 149) beginning at the north properry line of the Old Fire Hall Site, 2144 Dodd Road, to the north property line of 2150 Dodd Road. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 "Motor Vehicle" shall be deemed to mean any self-propelled vehicle. 2.2 "Person" shall be deemed to mean and include individuals, partnerships, associations or corporations. SECTION 3. Any person failing to comply with the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from after publication according to law. Enacted and ordained into an ordinance this 15th day of July, 1997. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS : ATTEST: By Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor � � � ' , ( � � i� �' . . . - -_ , ,. W 3�� n — V � � N � PR�p�s� I�G p,gEA . No pAgK OL'D �FIRc �" N� �L S� 1 L 6 ft PRIVACY F gZ�'� / FENCE � 0 0— o� o o—o—o—o— �a � � � 7' � .� ,ltC� • � , ` n1 `s�.y�- � . — �� 0 �]'� Ci#,y ai PROPOSED NO PARKING �� 9 � ,�' ,',,c',� 1�%ndota AREA AT OLD FIRE Heights HALL SITE GK tiQt VICPORIA CiJRYE • MENDOTA HEIGtfTS, MN 65118 �(612) '152-1850 �f !� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MENIO July 9, 1997 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FRONI: Marc S. Mogan Civil Engineer SUBJECT: 1997 Slurry Sea1 Job No. 9702 DISCUSSION• For the past several years City Council has approved $50,000 in the Street Department budget to slurry seal City streets. Areas slurry sealed in past years include: Eagle Ridge, Willow Springs, Copperfield 1'c, 2nd and 4`� Addition, Ever�een Knolls 1g` and 2nd Additions, Deer Trail Hills, Cherry Hills Znd addition, Ivy Falls Neighborhood, Somerset Hills, Crown Point, Northland Drive, and Huber Drive. Streets selected for slurry seal projects are chosen to extend and maximise the service life of an e;tisting structurally sound street. Staff has inspected City streets and propose the following for slurry seal under this improvement project: Chippewa Avenue, Knollwood Lane north of Emerson Avenue, Knollwood Court, Pondview Drive, Pondview Court, Pondview Terrace, Watersedge Terrace, Fieldstone Court, Fieldstone Drive west of Copperfield Drive, Surrunit Lane, Avanti Drive, Faro Lane, Twin Circle Drive, Bwana Court, West Circle Court, and Vail Drive. (see enclosed exhibits) A request was made by NI'ichael Silverman of 672 Ivy Falls Court to include Sylvandale Road in the 1997 slurry seal project. Due to the age and uneven conditions of the road it will be necessary to mill and overlay Sylvandale Road in the next three to five years. Slurry seal would not extend the life of the pavement or provide any lasting benefit to the road, therefore, I feel Sylvandale Road should not be included in this project. As part of the project, significant cracks will be sealed to prevent damage to the existing pavement section. Longitudinal and transverse cracks allow water to enter the street section. The service life of a street section which becomes and remains saturated will be shortened. After crack sealing is completed, a layer of slurry seal will be applied to restore and protect the e�sting bituminous surFace. Slurry sealing helps prevent oxidation of the bituminous in the pavement mixture which helps maintain the structural integrity of the pavement surFace. The Engineers estimate for this project is $63,000 not including overhead, inspection and engineering costs. Estimated costs for slurry seal on Decorah Lane and Chippewa Avenue are $3,200 and $11,500 respectively, which will be paid for by the Minnesota State Aid fund. The City's participation for this project will not eYceed $50,000. RECOMMENDATI4N: I recommend that Cauncil authorise the Engineering Staffto advertise far bids for the above project. i ` � 1' 1 If CounciI desires to imptement the recommendatzan, they should pass a motian autharisin� the advertising of bids for the 1997 Seal Coating Project. MSM ,r c1 . , � .---., \S •``. I � ou.�� a�ac� c�R� " {";�..»• . �'"" � \ � ; , �z� i --' `"'`•✓ 1 ` ^� �, ' �A�f�,F i Z` � ��q ; � � ��''� ,�� % ;�� ; ; , :/'"��fi�''�•t i � ;,� .� f ,' i E � �F��'� \ �JB�¢ ��' COPpF n`~�^\ � �� .� � i � / � � , � ,'��',F� ' � ; : � � r � � � .,,00�� : i � ' ' ,` //��''� .�_' • S r�� j ; / �m� t r � _...� � � �' %.,,.�— t �j } �� \ � , , `----.� � • a• a STREETS PR4POSED FOR SLURRY SEAL ��City fli Ai►1,1.a1 .h�.endo�a 1997 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT Hexgf�ts 1101 VICTORIA GURVE • MENDOTA HEIGNTS, MN 55118 {612) 452-1850 �I �� i i �' �1 � ' 0 ••• � STREETS PROPOSED FOR SLURRY SEAL �'�� City o£ ,,.�,1, NS,.era.dota 1997 SLURRY SEAL PROJE�T I�ei�h�s 11Q1 VICTORIA CURVE • MEND4TA HEIGHTS, MN 55118 �612} 452-1850 i� 9 s S Y Y � R? �••• STREETS PROP4SED FaR SLURRY SEAL �'�� City o� ,�.1�1� 1��.endo�a 1997 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT �4.?I�,�1tS �101 ViCTQR]A CURVE • MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55i�8 (612) 452-1850 � �4 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Guy Kullander, Project Manager � SUBJECT: Fire Hall Roof - Final Payments INTRODUCTION: July 10, 1997 � � Replacement of the roof at the Fire Hall was completed in April. Approval of payment was withheld until fmal inspection items were addressed and the City received the Ten Year Warranty as specified in the contract documents. Payments to Inspec., Inc. in the amount of $1,200.00, for inspection services and to Berwald Roofmg Company, in the amount of $67,309.00 for roof replacement are on the claims list. Both amounts are the Council approved contract amounts. There were no extras or add-ons to the original contracts. � ► ; � 11; 1 Approval of the List of Clauns will release payment to these two firms. Attached for your information is a copy of the "Roofmg System Guarantee." �301 Duluth S�reet, �linne�p��lis. �iN �=-�33 • Nh. 612546•3�i3-1 Fa� 61?•��16•4669 / ��= lVest (a�•tun r�ve.. Sui�e �120. �(ihvaukre. �NI =3?Oi • Ph. � I-l•7-1�1-ti9(i? �ax -t I-l-,--1-t-69�31 I'NSPEC, INC. F.n;aneering �C Architectur�l servires h�r rooh, pavemrncs, rsrene�r �ti�alls, �nd oucdoursports F.i��licies. � To: City of Mendota Heights Attn: Guy Kullander 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Project: Mendota Heights Fire Hall Items: Construction Observation Pre-construction meeting Periodic observation Materials testing Final inspection Invoice Date: 04/30/97 Invoice Number: Account: 10245 Customer PO: INV-0000000140 Pro�ect No: 200245.001 Invoice Total: $1,200.00 Terms: NET 30 Fed ID# 41-0997830 Remittance to Minneapolis address Please Pay From Invoice, And Show Invoice Number On Remittance As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourseives, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of ciients and our written authorization is necessary to publish any statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports. � � ��° STATEMENT mau� BERWAI.D R44F1NG CO., lnc. Cndustrial — Cammercial — Residential aoorxao ;�+ao s►ieer s�enu 2440 NQRTH CHARLES ST. NORTH ST. PAUI„ MN 55109 CITY OF MEiVDOTA HEI6HTS 1241 UIC70RIA CUF2VE MENOQTA NEZ6HT5 MN 55118 TERMS: DUE WHEN RECEIVED. r DATE�ACCT�.NO:::"„�.� 05-31-97 � 54751 . .. -AMOUi+tT EidCCLOSEB<<',,.;�`:.;`: � 1 ; REt'URN THIS PORTION WITH REMITi'ANCE � I ,�.( REF • ,..H.., :;.. ~ �•�'' DESCRfF.'T.ION:..;: E � � „„�. ,,,, .�.q '=��;.� ��` �: CAEDfCS;�' ✓ ! �a'��'��:71 'S"" s.. '"� � ',.a ,.�;s:;�� a�"�i:«�s ====�!`J��'� A�'H`t� R�G:€' OUTSTANpING OPEN ITE�lS ,rwv<wwwwrr�rww�r:��xkvcr*��k:� 050597 1�}058 CHARGE 67.�U9.�0 � CUR�ENT Ot.�ER 30 0�1�2 50 "vV�R 9� RETAINA� E,73c�9.4P� V�.00 t�.04 4�.�)� 0.G5t� 6734��3..G10 % We Build�Emironmertts Dear Building Owner: Schuller International, Inc. Roofing Systems 717 17th Street (80202) P.O. Box 5108 Denver, CO 80217-5108 Tel 303 978-2000 Fax 303 978-3904 Attached to this letter is the Schuller Gold Shield Roofing Systems Guarantee for your building. We believe your building is now protected by one of the finest commercial roofing systems available on the market today and we appreciate the oppominity to provide you with a level of protection unmatched in the industry. There are some things you should be aware of before you file this document away i.n a saf� �,lace: 1. This is not a mai.ntenance a�reement or an insurance policy. You should take a few minutes to read the Guarantee document and familiarize yourself with the conditions. If you have any questions about the Guarantee, contact Schuller Guazantee Services at� 1-800-231-1064. 2. You are required to perform routine maintenance on the roofing system to keep the coverage of the Guarantee intact. For your convenience, a list of mai.ntenance items is printed on the back of the guarantee. We hope that you never experience any di.fficulty with your roofing system. If you do have a problem, you should contact Schuller Guarantee Services at 1-800-231-1064. Please have the Guarantee at hand so that we may more efficiently handle your inquiry. Our Technical Services Departments are staffed by some of the most experienced roofing professionals in the industry. Please call on them for any questions you might have about commercial and industrial roofing, and Schuller Roofin� Products. Sincerely, � � . Jo J. C it1z.Z1 M ager, Guarantee Services S � Building Owner: S I� I H I U I � I � I E I R CITY OF MENDOTA HEIuHTS Roofing Systems MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55118 Building Name: Gold Shield� MENDOTA FIRE STATION 2121 DODD ROAD MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55118 Approved Roofing Contractor: BERWALD ROOFING COMPANY 2440 N. CHARLES STREET N ST. PAUL MN 55109 Date of Completion: 05/05/97 Roofing System Guarantee 716712 Guarantee Number: FNB0752982 COVERAGE The components of the Roofing System covered by this Guarantee are: Membrane Spec. and Type 4 G I G Flashing Spec. and Type DFE-1LB ,, Insu�ation Type NON_SCH , UGG . RFB Accessories (Type and Quantity) Term & Maximum Monetary Obligation to Maintain a Watertight Roofing System Years 10 � NO DOLLAR LIMIT TOTAL SQUARES 131 BUR 980 LINEAR FEE These Schuller Guaranteed componenLs are referred to below as the 'Roofing System', and ALL OTHER COMPONENTS OF THE OWNER'S BUILDING AAE EXCLUDED FROM THE TERMS OF THIS GUARANTEE. Schuller Intemadonal, Inc.' guarantees to the original Ovmer that during the Tertn commenang with the Date af Completion, Schuller will pay for the materials and labor required to prompUy repair the Roofing System to retum it to a watertight condition if leaks occur due to: (i) ordinary wear and tear, or deficiencies in any or all of the component materials of the Roofing System or (n) workmanship defiaenaes in the application of the Roofing System. WHAT TO DO IF YOUR ROOF LEAKS In the event any leak should xcur in the Roofing System: 1. Building Owner must notify Schuller Guarantee Services (see reverse) in writing immediately upon discovery ot the leak and in no event later than 30 days after discovery af the leak. 2. In response to this no6ce, Schuller will arrange to inspect the Roofing System, and (i) if the leaks are the responsibility of Schuller under this Guarantee (see Coverage. LimitaGons and ExGusions), Schuller vvill take prompt appropriate action to retum the Roofing System to a watertight condition, or (ii) if the leaks are not the responsibility of Schuller under this Guarantee, its representatives may, at the Building Owners request, advise the Building Owner within a reasonable time of the minimum repairs that Schuller believes are required to retum the Roofing System to a watertight condition. If the Building Owner, at his expense, prompdy makes such repairs to the Roofing System this Guarantee will remain in effect for the unexpired portion of its Tertn. Failure to make these repairs in a timely and reasonable fashion will void any further obligation o( Schuller under this Guarantee as to the damaged portion of the Roofing System. 3. In the event an emergency condition exists which requires immediate repair to avoid damage to the Building or its contents, then Building Owner may make essentlal temporary repairs. Schuller will reimburse Building Owner for those repair expenses which would have been the responsibility of Schuller under the Guarantee but for the emergency condiGon. UMITATIONS AND EXCLUSIONS This Guarantee is not a maintenance agreement or an insurance policy; therefore, rou6ne inspections and maintenance are the Building Owners responsibility (see reverse side of this document). The Guarantee does not obligate Schuller to repair the Roofing System, or any part of the Roofing System, for leaks resulting from (a) natural disasters, (b) misuse, abuse or negligence, (c) installation or material failures other than Uiose involving the component materials expressly defined above as the Roofing System or exposure of the Roofing System components to damaging substances such as oil or solvents or to damaging conditions such as vertnin, (d) changes to the Roofing System or the Building's usage that are not preapproved in wriGng by Schuller, or (e) failure ot the Building subsVate (mechanical, structu2l or otherwise and whether resulting from Building movement, design defecLs or other causes) or improper drainage (ponded water). Schuller is not responsible for leaks and damage resulting from water entry from any portion of the Building structure not a part of the Roofing System. Schuller shall have no obligation under this Guarantee until all bills for installation, materials and services have been paid in full to Schuller Roofing Systems and the Approved Roofing Contractor. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, SCHULLEF DISCIAIMS ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY, INCLUOING THE WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY AND THE WARAANTY OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR LIMITS SUCH WARRANTY TO THE DURATION AND TO THE EXTENT OF THE EXPRESS WARRANTY CONTAINED IN THIS GUARANTEE. THE EXCLUSIVE RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY OF SCHULLER UNDER THIS GUARANTEE IS TO MAKE REPAIRS THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN THE ROOFING SYSTEM IN A WATERTIGHT CONDITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OBLIGATIONS WHICH ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF SCHULLER UNDER THIS GUARANTEE. SCHULLER AND ITS AFFILIATES WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES TO THE BUILOING STRUCTURE (UPON WHICH THE ROOFING SYSTEM IS AFFIXED) OR ITS CONTENTS, LOSS OF TIME OR PROFITS OR ANY INCONVENIENCE. SCHULLER AND ITS AFFILIATES SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY OAMAGES WHICH ARE BASED UPON NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF WARRANTY, STRICT LIABILITY OR ANY OTHEFI THEORY OF LIABILITY OTHER THAN THE EXCLUSIVE LIABILITY SET FORTH IN THIS GUARANTEE. INCIDENTAL AND CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES SHALL NOT BE RECOVERABLE EVEN IF THE REMEDIES OR THE ACTIONS PROVIOED FOR HEREIN FAIL OF THEIR PURPOSE. No one is authorized to change. alter or modity the provisions of this Guarantee other than the Manager, Mariceting and Technical Services or authorized delegate. Schullers delay or failure in enforang ihe terms and conditions,cor ined in this Guarantee shall not operate as a waiver of such teRns and conditions. This Guarantee is solely for the benefit of the Buiiding Owner identified above and will be transferred by Schuller in its sole discretion only after receiving sadsfactory infortnation and payment of a transfer fee, which must be delivered to Schuller as soon as practical, but no later than 30 days after the date of Building ownership vansfer. In the event Schuller pays for repairs which are required due to the acts or omissions of others, Schuller shall be subrogated to all rights of recovery of the building owner to the extent of the amount of the repairs. Because Schuller does not practice Engineering or Architecture, neither the issuance of this Guarantee nor any review of the Building's construction or inspection of roof plans (or the Building's roof deck) by Schulier representatives shall constitute any warranty by Schuller of such plans, specifications and construction or in any way constitute an extens�on of ihe terms and conditions of this Guarantee. Any roof inspections are for the benefit of Schuller. Schuller does not supervise nor is it responsible for a roofing conVactols work except to the extent stated herein. 'SCHULLER INTERNATIONAL, INC. ('Schulle�'), is a Delaware corporation with its principal mailing address at P.O. Box 5108, Denver, Colorado 80217-5108. IN WITNESS WHEAEOF, SCNULLER INTERNATIONAL. INC. has caused this Guarantee to be duly executed and issued to cover the Roofing System specifically described in this Guarantee. S�C�H�U�L�L�E�R Roofing Systems P_.O. Box 5108 Denver, CO 80217-5108 SI�4S2 (3/95) �� ey: Title: and Nl�►INTENANCE PROGRAM E,.� Attorney-in-Fact In order to contE;,ue ihe c�verage of th�s Guar2nte� the foUowing maintenance program musi be impiemented. There are a number of items not coverec by this Gu2rantea ihac are the responsi�iiiry or the owner. In order to ensure that your neav roor will continue to perforrr iis runction, you must examir.s and maintain these items on a regular basis: • Maintain a file for your records cn this roof. including this uuarartee. invoices. and subsequent logs af all inspections performed and repairs that are made to the rcof. • Inspect your roof at leasi szmiannuallv. Tnis :s best dene in ihe Spring, after the roor nas been exposad to the harsh winter conditions, and, in the F311 aYar a�ong hot summer. IYs alsa a good idea to ex2mine the roof ior damage after severe weafher conditions. such as. h2iistorms. heavy rains. hiah winds, etc. • Since these rypes or roofs typically have a low sieoe, they are e�sily axam�red. Ho�vever. care must be taken to prevent falling accidenis. When checkina the roof: • Remove any debris, such �s. !eaves, small branches. dirt. rocks. e±c. that have accumulated. • Clean gutters, down saouts. drai� �s ard the surrounding areas. �tske cenain they ailow water to flow off the roof. Positive drainage is essential. • Examine all metai flasi-nincs and valleys �or rust a^d damaae that may have besn caused by wind or trafric on the roof, and make certain they are well aracheo and sealed. Any damaaed. loose or poorly seaied materials must be repaired by an Approved Rcoiing Conirac:or. Prirrted in uSA _� • Examire the are,:s that abut :ne rcot. Dam�ged masonry, pcoriy mounted counter�lashing, loose caulking, bad mortar jomts ana �ny �ccse stone or ;ile ��cinc can aeFear to be a m2mbrar2 leak. Have these items rep2ired if found to be de�ec;ive. • Exam�r:2 th2 edees af !he rcer. Wir,d damaae o��2n occurs in thes2 are2s. Materiais that have been lifted by the wind neeC to �e correcte� by an „pproved =+eoiing Contractor •�xamme any roof top zcuioment. �ucn as, air conditioners, avaporative coolers, antennas. etc. Make ceriain they do not move =xcessiveiy or �a4se a roof pro�le�n by ieaicing matenais onio the roof. • Check ;`e buiiding axterior fer settlement or movement. Siructural ��ovement can cause cracks and other problems wnicn ir tum may !ead to le2�cs :r. rour rco�ino svstem. • Examir.e protec;ive co2tings. any cracked, ilakino or blistered are�s must be recoated. Prot�c;ing your inveszment: • Avoid unnecessary soos too :ra�fic. • If you allcw eauipment s2rvicem�n ;o go onto the roof, teil them co be careful. Dropped tools, heavy equipment, etc. can dam2ce the membrane. ! og all sucn trios to ihe roof. • Do not allow s2roice personre! to make penetrations into the roof. thes2 are to be made only by an Approved Roofing Contrac,or All the tarr;s ard carciti�ns ef this Guarartea shall be constru�d under the internal law of the state ofi Colorado without reoard te tts confilic:s of 12w princ�oles. Invaiidity or unenfiorceability of any provisions herein shall not affect the validity or eniorc2aeiiity of any other �rovision wnicn shail remain in full force and eifect. This form is not �o be cooied or -eproducsd in any manner. This Guarantee is valid only in the United States of America. Inspe�iion Log D2tE �indings Date Findings lailctat'lI�� Servic�s De�2rtment vC:IU��@f ii.i��^2T.iCr21 inc.. �or,~�c �vsterrs �IV!SiOf!. .'r' O 5cx SiQB. Qe.^.ver, CO 80217 jE. 1-°C^-��-c��4. NE. ?-3CG-3=�-?603. "�iW: t-8�Q-�3�-?061: �W• 1-240-054-0071: W: 1-800-97_-��22: FAX. ;�C?i �78-=3G8 DIS'�� 1C: �Ti �CBS Mid•r�esc=r- F;2! :'��nniC?_I �ti�J�C:cS �'�=c(i:T.cT•.i. �� 5cx 3�_� Jel�er. IL 60u�� (8151 7s:3-2013. FAX. (8 �5j 7=1 -o1,i i �3S28!r "=8^c? (703) 904-026 . rt1X: � � 03) ?84-0226 r,,:.,, =�r.�ic�, ..�..,c�s �=�zr,�.��t. =:�. 2. 3ox ?E�. E�:r.�ur� V.-1 _ c Scu:^eas;ar� r:n!^ .�:f1� �! _ �.-C"r'„c. - .�. �`- �^ _ .:'' `S � �. t.l d� - 4 ��.. s�:,:��:� �,_ � ,,.�:,�. •- .. �x ��.,�-.� :;a�,;a. �. c�µ� (<041 58i-o34�. � a;.. o ��-ssa JOlit!:VU?Si��^ `tc�iC �C^f?IC3I JG�rv!^BS �tOrG::^�':�i. �... �GX `�'Q�� -� '��rur:h, i X E i=��. ��`1 %� `.3.':'a2Q4 �=.��. �s � i� J.R'..^.'JG1.`'. �1�i�5i8:'�' =ieic i �.,.,r�ica. �en�;c�.. �e^a-'m� .- ��ox �° � P�t,s, ,;rg C,a 9��0� ��10) -�32-0�26, FhX. ;5 �0� 427-2�09 , LIST OF CONTR.ACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Jul�r 15, 1997 �''�ncrete/MasonrX Contractor License R. Holmes Concrete Inc. Excavating Contractor License Friedges Landscaping Inc. A. Kamish & Sons, Inc. Mack's Excavating M& W Water & Sewer, Inc. Gas Piping Contractor License Master Mechanical, Inc. , HVAC Contractor License R& S Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. G�neral Contractor License � Advanced Environments, Inc. Nilles Builders Inc. Pat Henry's Prestige Pools W. Zintl, Inc. Juiy 15, 1497 TO: Xayar aad Citg Counci2 ' CLelIXS ISST S7XM1l1lRY: ' 2'otal CXaims Signtf3cant CZa3ms MCES » NSP ' PEIP anusuaZ Claims Berwaid Roofing Boown & Chris Eirst Trust Firstar Narwest Bank Vi Gon C � � � .Y , �� . . . .. ` � . 't•'F.'i�w. ' r�� 1. ' r :i :^, :. ��{� :�,� . _ , ��;:�;:> ' y 1''l-�. PY" sac chgs utilities insurance Fire Hall roaf wentwprth wtr bond pyr�ts �� Ti2sen impr 1,424,446 � � �' ;�.: 54>549 ;; s,s: 4,527 "-.�,,.;. 13.Q84 .r:•";: - `.,'� " sY ' .;. 67,309 3,731 ' ' � 246,829 ' 309,007 495,732 240,487 a i4 J�.�t � July 15, 1997 Clairo=_ List Mor� 10: AM City c�f Plendata Hei�. .. Terno Checu N�.irnber 1 Terno. Check Number Ver�d_m Name Rcca�.irh Cade 1 ATbT 01-4210-110-10 ± ATR�T - �1-4�ia-a•��l-�S� Tr_�tals Terno Cneck Numher- � 1 ^� � � Terno Check N�.unber 2 Air• Tc�uch Cellular 01-421�-020-[Q 2 Air Tc�uch Cellular 01-421@-110-10 . ._ _. - -- - - 2 Air Touch Cel lular'---- ---•- -• --Q1-4e10-07Q=70----- •- - 2 Rir Tc�uch Cellular 01-421@-03Q-3� - - -- - • - - - - • ---...-- -- ---- ---- ---�------- ---- --- ---- 8 Totals Temo Check Nurnber 2 - - - - - - --- ---- - •• — - -----�_.__.. .- - - •---- - -� Terno Check Nurnber 3 3 A T FF T Wireless Svcs 01-421Q�-02@-20 � 3 R T $ �T Wireless 5vcs -'"'- " 01-421Q�-030-30'-""-"� '"" " " _ 6 - ---Tchals-Terno"`CheckTJiuntier"---' o---" ' "—'---'---" V Temo Check Number 4 ' � 4 Albir�san Q�5-43Q:,-1a�-15 4 Rlbinson 05-4305-105-15 • -- - - •------ -- - -'- -.... � 4 Albinsun " 0�=43@5=105=15"'.____.'__'—. "."____" 4 Albinscm 05-4305-1@5-15 . _ _ 16 _ .. .__. . ._.. . - ---� - - -• •- - - - - Tatals Terno Check Nurnber 4 Terno Check Number 5" ` ""- " S Fear Corn 01-43�0-44Q�-�@ S Rear CCrn @1-4330-440-20 10 Tc�tals Terno Check N�_unber 5 Temo Check Nurnber 6 6 Rerwa.ld Ro��fing ^�-4480-000-00 6 T�_�tals Temo Checl< N�vnber 6 Terno Check N��rnber 7 7 Kev'sn E+atchelder �1-440�-11Q�-10 Dep� ��=��r ZO-Po ice 30-fire 40-CEO Comments ld calls ld calls i �.in svc tun svc 1L1Yi SVC ,t �.in svc JUYI SVC �un svc Dept ��=i��sties p F'aae 1 80-Planning 85-Recycling 90-Animal Control Amc��.int �8. 81 I J. SJ 44. 46 314. 81 15.88 5 �. 87 43. 35 4�4. 91 12. 77 1:,.68 '-- ` �6. 45 solvs 152.63 solvs 41.�6 SD1y5 - " - •_ - '-" -- • •- --•- 379.91---•---- rtn 51.12cr JLL. �A _ ' " rors rors re fd rac�f exo reirnb mcroa conf 45. S�0 254. 8�b ��.ea E7. .;05. 00 F�. aa�. ac��+ i sa. as T � 14 Jul � Claims List Paoe � Mc�n la:�_ RM Citv af Mendota Hei�.,..s Terno Check. Ni.�rnber 7 Terno. Check N�_imber Vendor Narne Rccourh Code C��mroer�ts Arno�.int � i s�a. as T��tals Terno Check N��rnber 7 Temo Check N�.�rnber 8 - "-' "-- ' ' -" B Piffs Ir�c QI-4200-610-7c� ,7u1 rent '379.E8 8 978. 68 Totals Terno Check Nurnber 8 Terno Check N�.�mber 9 ' 9 bet ter P�.rys - ---- - - - - --�--- ------ ---._.. _—. _ ... - - - -- --- - - - @1-4300-110-1� solvs - � � � 53. �0 9 53. 00 .--- T�t�ls-Terno- Check �Number - -- - - - •• ---� -•--- ------•-------..._..- - - ----- - - -...- ----�------------- --•- - - Terno Check N�.�mber 1� 1� Brc�wr� R Chr i s I r�c 37-446Qi-718-00 f i na 1 wnt wtrrnn 3. 731. 40 , ----��--la -----------•-----.__ ._..----•---- ----- --•- - - ------ --- ---••---------3:73i'.-4Qr----------.. .-- Totals Terno Check Nurnber 1@ •� Teroo' Check Nurnber "-' '"- "' "' 1 S""' "' '-----'--' --' " "�"' " "-'-' li Ch�oin Cor�st Pulletin 27-4240-853-@0 bid ad 134.40 • '' 11 Chaoin Const-Pul let in --""-�-'-' �" "--' —2?=4240=7�I=@0---- ---• bid"ad •--•- ----- _..._.......---._._..._. - 134.40 _� .--�-- - -�- ------._ 22 . �68.8� Totals Terno Check Nurnber ' - -' '-'-I1 --"'�' "- --"--"�"-'---' - "- ' - - - -- -- �- - Temo Check Number 12 12 Citv r�f St Ra�.il Z�1-44�Q�-�JQ��J� sions 177.6� 12 City c�f St F��ul a1-442�-07a-70 flo��dino 225.a0 24 4a2.60 Tr_�tals Temo Check N�unber 12 Terno Check Ni_vnher 13 13 Cc�ntact Mnbile Cc�rnrnunic�tioris 01-4330-460-30 rors 85.0�'� 13 85. Qi0 Tc�tals Temo Check Nurnber 13 Terno Check. N�.�mber 14 14 Cc�ntinental Cablevisior� s1-4305-03Q�-30 ,��.ir� svc 2.�� 14 �. 0:1 14 Jul 7 Clairns List Mc�n 10:__ RM Citv _�f Mendota Hei� _s Terno Check N�_unber 14 Terno. Check ' N�unber Ver�dor �I�rne Accc.unt Cade Camrner�ts Tr_�tals Terno Checit N�_unber 14 Terno Check N�.unber 15 15 Continer�tal Safety Eo �G�S-4J�L�J��J�[.�-J�L� solvs iJ Tc�tals Terna Check Nurnber 15 " Terno Check N��rnber 16 F�aoe 3 Amc�unt 82.48 82. 48 16 Cor�nect Inc �1-4210-030-30 rnav svc 12.05� 16 - --• �- - • - ----_.__ ...--- -� - • - ' 12. Q0 T��tals Terno Check Nurnber 16 Ternp Check Ni.irnber - - - -17 - - - -- � . .- - - - - - ---.-. • .-- � - - - . 17 Coov Sa�es Inc 01-435�0-11�-1� solvs 1.77 - -V�'17 C��py Sales'�Inc --- - -"' � `"-' - 0I=4300=110=10 " ' '� "'� �"'-- solys ' ' -" - ' ' 31. 37' '" 34 33. 14 - ---Tatals Te7no'�Check"Niimbe'r-------------17— --•-�.—__..�--------•- --� -- ---- -� ---- - - -- ---.—�_----•------�----- - - Terao Check Nurnber 18 _ 18 Caverall 01-4335-310-5�1 tul svc EQ�.00 18 Coverall 01-4335-310-7a iul svc 60.00 - - -- -- •-- --- - - -- --- 18 Cuveral l ._ __' 15-43�5-310-60 __...._ _ _.__ _ . _ �ul svc _ _ " " �' _ "59.9'3'_ _' "_ 18 Cc�ver�ll 01-4335-315-30 ��_il svc 137.39 72 " " "- -- •� ---- - - ---� - 317.38 Tatals Terno Check Nurnber 18 Temo Check Plurnher 19 19 Dakc�ta Ca�.inty Hwy Deot 01-4�11-420-S�.l lst 1/2 tfc sional 1'3 Tutals Terno Check Nurnber 19 Terno Chec4. N�.irnber 20 20 Dakuta Countv Tech Inst 01-4400-020-20 soo trna :'_0 Tr_�tals Terno Check N�.�rnber 20 Terno Check N�.unoer 21 21 Electr_� Watchrnan IS-4��nc-49�-6�c'1 �nd otr _`1 ... _.. 1. 078. 5'3 1. 078. 59 35Qi. 0N ;50. @0 265. 19 265.19 14 Jul 7 Claims I�ist Mr_��-, i+�:W... AM CitV c+f Mendc�ta HeiU...;s Terno Check N�arnber 21 Tern o. Check Nucnber Uer��or Narne Accc�unt Ccde 7c�tals Temo Checl� Number 21 Terno Check N�erober L� " �"22 Ellic�tt R�.�tc� Soly--�. --- 'Q�1-433Q1-49@=70 �� E 1 1 i c�t t As_�t a Sc� i y �l i-433Qt-44�-�+ii 2 E?lic�tt Putc� Solv 01-4330-44Q-20 ""2� Elliott Ruta Soly -""" - 01-4330-430=70 2� Elliatt Rutrs So3y 0k-433Q�-490-70 22 Elliott Ruto Soly 01-4330-440^20 SJ2 TGtd18 Terno Check Nurnber � Terno Check Numher �3 -""""'23"Faci 1 ity -Systerns `""' "' """--"'O$'=448Qt=�0Q�-fi0 -'--" . 23 " .'_Tc,tals Ter�io Check Number--------�_._.---`3-----__._—..._._..-_...._. ---• . Terno Check Nurnber �4 �4 First Trust 01-2115 24 First Trust fl1-1�90 . _.__�.24�-First'Yrust _.r___.—. - --�5=44�.�i�@0mr=00 -._' 24 First Trust 2L�.�-44�6-000-00 �4 First Trust 35-4�L6-000-td0 __.�_24-First-"T'rZist._.,__ _...._..._. ---95-445.�=@00f=00-._ _�_ 24 First 7rust 8�-4456-@00-0N �4 First Trust 74-4456-�@0-@0 1'32 Tatais Te�no Check Nurnber �4 Terno Check Nurnber 2� 25 F B S Investrnent Svc Q�i-4490-11@-30 �LJ Tatals Tarno Check Number 25 Terno Check N�.�rnber ��, 26 Fisher G'hr_�tr_� 01-430.�.i-@2@-20 �E � Totals Terno Check N�,��nber 26 Terna Check tva.�rnber G'7 27 First�r Tr�.��t Co �1-Gil� C�rnrnent s Gaoe 4 Arna�.rrh -�' o�rts 10.8�1 ' , part s 41. 9�. . parts 65.96 part s 6'3. 8�3 oarts 63.9� care cr 22.0�cr W 3fl. 38 - ---._--- --- ch �fimn ' - - • ------ — ------1: 68`l . 69 - _ __ _ _ _ - --- .�_..__. '- -------- � 1.682.69 ` or i r�c pvrnt orinc aymt �_ ..__ -•-bd 'pvmt --•--..__ bd o,yrnt svc fee - ----'" bd oyrnt ' "" bd pvmt bd oyn�t safekeep .� �-�ri svc orlYic p�/rnt 170.00Q.00 17�c1, ��i0. Q�Oc�^ ..___.__- ._.___ -2Qr;'00�D: 0�ir.--'_-- 520.00 4i�8. 78 - •--- -------- -� --- I3Qr, Qi00.`0Qr__. _ � ...... 31, t�50. Q14h 44, 850. Qi0 246,$28.78 36. 0Q� J6. Q�Q� 76. nc r� 76. Q�Qt �40. @N0. 0u1 � 14 J�_� 17 Claims List Mcm 10_ _ RM City c�f Mendc�ta Hei....cs Temo Check Nurnber �7 Terno. Ch ec I� N�.unber Vendcm Narne Rccr_��.ir�t Code �7 Firstar Tr�.ist Co �1-1�90 27 Firstar Tr�.�st C� 11-4456-Q��0-@0 �7 Firstar Tr�ist Co 11-445�-�Q0-00 27 Firstar Trust Ca 42-4456-@00-@v7 �7 Firstar� Tr�ist Ca 4c^=4455-0��1-00 �� 162 Tc�tals Terno Check Nurnber 27 Terno Check Number 28 28 GCA Services Q�1-4330-44@-�0 _ _ `8 _. .. ..- - - - �- -- --_ . _._ __. _ . _ Totals Terno Check Nurnber �B Temo CFieck Num6er--- • �-- �- -29 - •- - ---- --- . .� . _ _ . _. .- - •- - - s 2'3 Gooher State One Call 15-4210-@6�D-6@ 29 _ Totals Terno Check N�.unber 23 Temo Check N��rnber 3� F.,. :-- "--s0 Nir�dino Heating'" " ' " ' 01-3253 `-'- " - � 30 ' -- -- --- --- ---- --.... - Tatals Terno Check Ni.irnber �- "- 30 "� Terno Check N�.unber 31 _ 31 Harold Chev @1-4330-44@-20 31 Tc�tals Terno Check Nurnber 31 Teroo Check. Nurnber �� 3� Huohes & Castellc� 01-4�22-12�-2� Totals Terno Check N�.�mber 3� Terno Check N�.�rnber 33 3� Hr,ffers Ir�c 01-4330-215-7@ Totals Terno Check Number 33 Terno Check Nurn6er 34 Cumrnent s orinc oyrnt oark hr,nds park bc�nds irnor bor�ds irnor bar�ds F�aoe 5 Rmc��.�nt 24�. 0�0. V�Ocr 26. 97�1. @0 40, 000. Q�0 42. @37. 50 �0¢�. smm. ma �m�. �a��. sa rors 3�.00 ..-- -� -- -•- -- - -- 32. @0 ��m svc 19.25 1�. �J rfd c�verovrnt" '--"' -"-'--- '--'--�-33:50-- �' 39. 50 rors 399.22 399. 22 ,7�_tn svc solvs 3. 132. 15 3. 132. 15 E2s. @3 62�. �3 � 14 Ju.l 7 Clairns List �'aoe E Mc�n 10:�•., RM City c�f Mendota Hei.,��ts Terno Chec4. N�.�rnber 34 Ternp. Check Nurnber Vendcm Name Accc��.rr�t Code Cc�mments iaroo�_rr�t 34 H�_idson Mao Cc� 01-440c-�2Q�-�0 solys 76. �6 34 76. 2E Tatals Terno Check Nurnber 34 Terno Check Nurnber 35 '-"35 Insoec Inc '�" "-' '�-448Q�-0�1@-@�d re fh raaf 1. 200. Q� 3,� 1. 2�0. @0 -_Tota'ls-'Teirio-Check-M�mber�_"-.___ _'35 -•-- ---- ...--- - - - - - ._. . - •---• -- --•-- -- -- -•- -• - - . Terna Check Nurnber 36 _ 36 I4c�n Office Solutian @i-4330-440-20 ,7un rntcr� 4�D.20 -•----36------ ---- •---�•--- -- ---------------------•---------- - - -- - ------- - - �•---•--- •-- --- �40.0� "- - Tutals Terno Chec4e. Nurnber 36 -Terno"Check-Nurnher '--- •------37'-�---------•---- --------._..__...__._._. .. .--• •- - -----•- _ 37 I I M C Q�1-4404-110-10 dues 95.00 37 '35. Qi@ . Totals Terno Che�k Nuniber 37 Temp Check Nurnber 38 ..- ---38 J'�& A Cleariers"_..__._�_-__v._0T"=44-f0=02�1=�0'--•------.._ ._-- • - --- - juri cIna_ ._.. -.- - - --..._ ..- - --- •- - 172: 03 --- - 38 J& A Cleaners 01-43N5-020-20 �un clno 4.46 ------76 - - - - ---- •--- ------ ------- -- ------- --- • - - ----- - - -- - - - • - --- - ----- - � - - �-176. 49 Tc,tals Terno Check Nurnber 38 Terno Check Nurnber ---'-"39`�" '� '-""'-'- -"'-'-' 39 J C Electric nc8-433�-@Q�0-@0 rors 135.00 39 135. Qi� Totals Terno Check Nurnber 39 Terno Check N�_unber 4� 4Q Jirik Sc�d Farrn 2'3-4337-@@@-@0 sc�d 95. �0 40 Jirik Sod Farrn 29-4�a�-m�+a-Qa oallet rtn 1�D.00cr � am as.2a Tr_�tals Terno Chec1�. Nurnber 4iD Temo Check Nurnber- 41 41 Paioe N,rieoer �1-3E15 recvle bin rfd 6.00 14 Ju �7 Clairns List Mon 10:��r� AM City ��f Meridata Hei.,��ts Terno Check Ni.unber 41 Terno. Check N�_unber Vendc�r Name Accr_��.rr�t Code 41 T��t�ls Ternv Check N�_unber 41 Terno Check Number 4� 4� Lakeland Fard nc1-433�1-46Q�-30 42 Tc�tals Temo Check Nurnber 42 Terno � Check Nurnber � 43 -� ' �� - " � �� 43 Lake Ca�.ir�try Chaoter �1-44�c0-150-3a 43 Tc�tals Temo Check Nurnber 43 Terno Check Nurnber 44 ' �- 44-Lake Restc�ratic�n"Inc '� �' ' `01-4330-215-70 --'�" -- . 44 - ---TotaIs Temo CFieck IVuinber-�-�—""---- 44 ---------` --- Terno Check N�.unber 45 _ 45 Leef Prc�s Q�S��#JJJ�J1�-JQ 45 Leef bras 01-4335-310-70 - - -- --45 Leef -Prr�S" "' ' "' " -"' """"- -LJ-NJJJ�;SO�G� _'"•� • � 13� Tutals Terno Check. Nurnber 45 " Terno Check. Numher 46 46 �i 11 ie S�.�burbar� News �7-4�4�D-853-0@ 46 Lillie S�_�bi_irban News 01-4:='4Qi-0B0-8� 46 Lillie S�.tburbar� News @1-4490-c�70-7Q� 138 Totals Terno Checl! N�.�rnber 46 Terno Check N�.�rnher 47 47 Lyr�n G�?LiVPV @1-4305-02Q�-�� 47 Lynn Re�ve�� 01-4305-020-24 47 � yr�r� :�eavev @1-43Q�5-Q�2nt-^c� 141 Totnls Temo Check Nurnber 47 Terno Check N�.unber 48 Cr_�mment s parts 2�87 F�aoe 7 Arno�_rrit 6. �0 2. 56 �. 56 reqr kaiser 13�.00 135. @�b re �ivy-falls porid '"' "' " ' '" 167.08 167. 08 �un svc 14.SB �un svc 14.58 ----- -�----•�uri�s"vc- ---------�--•---- -•--�------I4:58 _._. 43. 74 bid ad pr�e creek hr�o nc,tices ernol ad overovrnt SO1 VS SDIVS 33.G1 59. 04 1 �0. 8Q� 243. Q�5 54. 2�Dcr �J.7.1. JJ 4. 2� ��3. 40 14 J�_i_ i7 Claims l.ist Raoe 8 Mon 10:.�•ei AM Citv ��f Mendata Hei.,��ts Terno Check Number 48 Terno. Check N�.unber Vend_m Name Acco�_int Code Ccrtnrnerhs Rmo�.rr�t 40 Mendc�ta Heights Rubbish 01-42s�-�ia-sa .��r� svc 105.�5 48 Mer�data Heiohts R�_�bbish 01-428Q�-31@-7@ lur� svc SQ�J.�J 48 Mendota Heiohts Rubbish ]5-4�80-310-60 Jun svc 105.21 - 48 Mend��ta Heiohts Rubbish Qi-4�80-315-30 ,7un svc 45.�0 1'32 36�1. 91 - Tc�tals Terno Check Nurnber• 48 Terno Check Nurnber 49 - "49-Metrc�-Co�_�nci l-Er�vironmentSvc - - 15=4448-060-6@ "" - - " - m�y/��rr� "sac chgs - ' " - 62, 750, Q0 - - 4'3 Metrr_� Counci 1 EnvironrnentSvc a1-2130 sac cr re brawn inst 6, 650. 0�cr • 49 MetrG Ca�ancil Enviranrner�tS�ic 15-3615 rnav�.)un sac chgs 551.0@cr 147 54,549.@0 Totals Terno Check Nurnber 4'3 � Terno Check N�.vnher SQ , ------50 Midwest-Rhota'Svc �-- -- -- ------ @1=4305-@2Q�-2Q�___._------. ._._. _. . --- - -�un 'svc - -- -•-- ---- ��---- - •- ---- 67. �5 . -- ----- r' J0 G7.�J :. ---T�tals-Teifio CHecR Nurnber ---•--;,Q�- ---��.,--• ----------••----------------�--- ------- -----� ------ - - ---- - -- .: Terno Check Nurnber 51 ' 51 Midwest Wire Steei 01-43@5-07Q�-70 solvs 55.38 ._ ..- -•------------- -- - - - ------•-- ----�-•---- �---�--- - - - - - - - -- JS " __.._..'_'_'-_ "__'_"_'" J.l.J Tatals Temo Check N�v�iber 51 _ "Terno Check Number �--- - - g� _.____.-•----------------- -•----�• - - - - ----•----�--- -- - - - - 52 M F' G 01-4305-04a-40 solys 246.02 52 M R 6 �- �� -- '` " 01-4305-¢�40-4Q� " d i sc ' 4. 62cr 1�D4 241. 4� Tatals Terno Check N�srnber 52 Temo Check Nurnber 53 53 Mir�r�esota Tr_�ro Inc �1-4�30-490-70 o�rts 936.08 gy 83E. 08 Tatals Terno Check. Ni_�rnber 53 Terno Check N�,unber 54 54 Mirm Recr 6 Rar^k A=_sn 01-449�-07@-7� ernol ad :,0. �@ JLI Jf1G. Q�Q� Totals Terno Check Nurnber 54 � ��14 Ju 37 Claims List Mon 10.�.d RM Citv ��f Mendota He....�ts Temo Check N�.unber JJ TEf11D. Check N�unher Ve�f�d� m Narne Acca�.int Cade 55 Nel sc�i�� Rad i�� Carnrn 07-4.s30-0�c'10-�d� JJ T��tals Terno Check N�unber 55 Terno Check N�.�mber 56 56 Nor•thern ' @1-4305-070-7@ - 56 Nc�rthern 01-433@-49a-70 112 -- - - - -- - - -. .._ _-. _-- -�-- -- ---- -- Tatals Temo Check Nurnber SE �� Terno Check Nurnber - 57 � � � � - -- -�-� '� � - - - � 57 Nc�rthern State F'ower @1-4�12-315-3a ' 57 Nor�thern State Pc�wer --' ' " � 01=4�1�-sT0-50—�----- - �- 57 Narthern State Pr_�wer @1-421: -31Qi-7Q 57 Northern State Puwer 1:,-4212-310-6a ' 57 Northern 5tate Rawer 01-42T2-320-7�---------'-"" " 57 Nc�rt her�n St at e Pcwer 15-4;� 12-4@0-60 57 Northerr� State Rr_�wer Q�8-4212-000-@0 '"" -'-'S7 Northerr� Stat'e' F�r_�wer"'"""'-"-"'" --'01=421"r-3T5=30��----�-�"�� - 57 Northerr� State F�c,wer 2B-4211-@Q�C-�da 57 Northern State F�awer a1-4�11-3Q�0-50 _ ' S7 N��rthern State Pawer " "' @1-421'f-420-50---' ---�--'�-' '�- 57 Nc�rthern State Pc,wer 08-4211-�00-00 . _684 --- - - - _.. - - --.-•••---- -- --- - Totals Terno Check Number 57 Temo Check Nurnber 58 " -"-'- "` '" -'" 58 Nc�rthern State F�c�wer Q�1-4211-3�@-70 58 Nc�rt her�n St at e�'c�wer 15-4: I 1-4�1Q�-60 116 Tr_�tals Terno Check Nurnber 58 Terno Check. Nurnbe+• 59 59 Naraiest Bar�k Mols ��-4456-@�0-0� 59 Nc�r^west 6znk Mols 31-4456-Q��0-0�D 59 N��rwest E�rik Mols 36-4456-@00-@0 53 Norwest Bank Mols '35-4456-0��0-0a :,9 Nc�rwest Pank Mols 11-4455-�00-�� 59 �lor,west Eant� Mn 1 s 1 1-445E-0�0-00 59 N��r-west Pank Mols �3-4455-0�D0-�N ,�9 Nor^west R�nk Mo 1 s 2'3-4��6-�0N-�0 ,�,9 Nr�t`�1PSt Ear�k Mols 37-4456-Qi0�-��D Cr_�rnrner�t s t�.tl mtcn solYs parts �ul svc iul svc " - � � �ul svc �ul svc �ul "svc"" "' " - " tul svc �ul svc -� �� 1 "s'vc-------•-- tul svc ,t u 1 svc " �ul svc "'----" ' lul svc ,�ul bal iul svc 79 bds 87 bc�nds 91 bands 89 bonds oark bunds park bc�nds 94 bor�ds 94 br_�nds 94 bar�ds Raoe 9 Arno �_m�t 62. 40 62. 4� 199.62 87. 28 _. 266. 90 54. 19 " 71. 48 •`- _ - 71. 48 71.47 - �-- - 4'3. �7 • -- -- - 14. 91 63. 42 � _ ._�. -- -- 7'34. 46 -• - - - -•--- - • - •• - -- ---- - -- - - 260.84 431. 16 "• -- • •- - ----339. 14 - - • - --- -- - - : - 1. 402. :,7 ••- •- - - 3: 684. 69 - - -- -- " 241.31 60@. B4 842. 75 450. ��0 23. 992. S�d i ��. I JJ. %J CJ� �E�. J� E5. Q��. OV.i 52, 33�. �0 4�. @N@. �v.t �i.si�.sa S J. ��J. Q��D 14 J�_i 17 • Claims List M��n 1@ Am Citv c�f Menac�ta He Terno Check Nurnber- 5'3 Terno. Check N�_irober Vendcm Name pcco�_rr�t Cc�de 59 Norwest Banli Mols 8B-4455-1d@0-m� 59 Norwest Par�k Mols 88-4456-Q0�c-@N 59 Nc�rwest Eank Dt� 1 s 37-4455-000-00 � 708 - ---•--•.._.._ . .. Totals Terno Check Nurnber 59 Temo Check Nurnber 60 "" ' '- " ' 60 Nc�rwest Par�k Mols 37-4456-Q�00-QN - � "60 Norwest Pank" Mols"-- -" " "' --'-'1f=�4'4;,.�.�=000-00 --'" " 60 Norwest Rar�k Mols 11-4456-000-�0 E0 Nc�rwest Panl+ Mols il-4��6-��e0-Q�0 " 6@ Norwest Hank Mo 1 s " ' -' --'- '-"-25=4226-000-Q�N ---" " 60 Nc,rwest Bank Mols 31-4�26-¢�00-@0 60 Narwest Bank Mols 35-4226-000-00 _ ---'60 Noraest-Bank-Mol"s ----' —29'=42��0@0=0Q�--'--`"'--- 6@ Narwest b�nk Mols 37-4226-�0@-@� 60 Norwest Bank Mols 3E-4226-v7�00-0� - --6� Narwest"Har�k" Mals-- - --�- •---�---88=4226=Q�0@-@0 ----- - -�.`._ 60 Nor-west Eank Mols 37-4e26-�00-�0 :"'�_`720'--•-------�----•-------- - — ------- Tot�ls Terno Check Nurnber 60 " Temo' Check�Number�-"------�6T----- —'--'--'--"""----"- 61 Narwest Hank Mols @1-2115 ---' -61 Norwest""Pank' MoIs' _. - ----'---OI'-223Q�----------------•-• 1�� ' ' Tatals Terno-Check N�vnber " ' "-" '6i"--' --"' "---"""'------ " Terno Check Ni.trnber 6� 62 Oak.cT^est Ker�nels @1-4�21-800-'30 62 Oakcrest Kennels 01-4:=25-800-90 1�4 Tc�tals Terno Check Nurnber 62 Ternr� Check N�.�rnber- 63 63 Office Max @5-4.^'.iQ�Q�-iQJ�SJ E3 Tr_�tals Temo Check �14irnber 63 Terno Check N�.unbe*� 64 04 0�_�tc+��c�r ➢esion 01-4.'�iJ%-Q�J�-JQ 6%+ _ cs Comments 32 bGnds �2 bc�nds 9� bc�nds Gaoe 10 Rmaunt 45,maa.ao 18.13@.00 125, �c�00. Q�0 �iJ�� B�I. �J 9� bonds 2.968.75 9� bc�r�ds ' "' 20. 00Q�. Q�0 ' " 92 br�rids 18.3'3�.50 svc fee 400.Q0 - - svc fee _ ..._ ___. . ._. _. `a�. Q� - -- svc fee �00.00 svc fee 200.0¢� �. ---- -� svc fee- - -�--- -- -- _. _. _. 1 @0. 0Qi - - - - --�- svc fee 5@.00 svc fee 200.0a " svc fee _ '_' "'__ "'_' S0. Q�0 ------ svc fee 150.@0 ---•-- ------------ • -- ----. ..--•--- _..---4^c,311.25 ------...- — - prir�c ovrnts 2�:,, @00. 00 - -- - - orinc ovrnts ' _------- ---•----295.�00:0�cr-�- - - - - -•- --- �. �� i �.in svc iun sv solvs SDiVS 1 oQi. QiQi �Q4.�5 364.�5 68.39 E8. 38 .'.�J. JG .SJ. Jb 14 J�_� �7 Clairns List Mr_�n 1�c Q�� Citv of Mendc�ta Ne. ..s Temu Chec�+ Ni.trnber- 64 Tetna. Check N�.arnber �lend� �r N�rne Acca�rr�t CadP zotals Ternp Check N�.imber 64 Tecno Chec.4. Nttrnber 6� bJ Mar4 Olser� ' Qr1-4500-�c�5a-50� � E3 J Tc�tals Terno Check N�,unber 65 ` Temo Chec4c Neam6er o6 66 0 U W S Q�S-4335-�0@-Q�N tur, svc 66 . _ _. ---- ._�.__. ... _. _ 7c�tals Temo Check Nurnber 66 Terno Check. Ni.�rnber 67 ..... •---------_.. -�-- - - • - -- -•- -... . .._. 67 OxyQen Service C�_� �$-433�-Q��-�+i� �un �et 67 Dxyoen Service Cr_� '""-qI-4301c.i-030-30 " '"" ' �un act f34 _'" Tai�l"s "�'erno Check N�.imber _ � . —...----6-r— ---------- ----�• ---------_.. .. Temo Check Naarciber fs$ 68 P& H Whse 01-4330-490-70 parts 6$ R R N Wiise 01-433Qs-215-?0 parts _ __fi8 F; "� Fi Whse` - --..._.r01=�i3.�4t=430-�7�d'�.._.----- -- -------------pa"rts -- 68 �' & H Whse 01-4330-49�b-70 part s 68 F' & H Whse 01-4334�-4'30^7t parts 34a 7ota15 Terno Check N�.tirnber 6$ Terno Check, Ni.�rnber 6'3 �j'� PPYiYsWP_1 S F'Uli� Q�i—ti1#Q�J'—D.'Q�'—J� 69 Tc�tals Teriao Check hi�.�r�ryFser- 69 Terno Check N�,unber 70 70 G'C�1Tus Imol �t1-4330-4'30-70 70 �'�� l f i.i� I mo l 01-43,;�-4?�-7v� t40 Tr�ta?s Tem+_+ Check N�.unber 70 3esno Check Nunrber 7i 71 Prir�cia�l M�.it�_aai @i-24�71 ��' ' 1�.11 prern Ccrtnmer�t a mawino 56IY5 o�rts oarts Gaoe 11 Amc��.ir�t 875. 0ki 875. �4� 32, 04 32.64 �7. 4�0 H 13. 80 --- . _._. 4�. 5Q� i 784. �B •-• I�8.16 ' - -- .__-- • - - --- f31.`33 -. . - •-- ---• �a�. �� 1 Q�6. 99 1, 354. 8"� 6. 8:� 47. 64 54.49 99. '32 14 J�.il 7 Claims l.ist Mr_�n 1�: Abt Citv r_�f Mendata Hei. ,.s TEhip C:heck Ntunber 71 Teraa. Check N�unber Vendc�r Narne Acec�+.�nt Cc�de 71 �'rincioal M�.�tual 01-413�-0�0-�20 71 F�r^ir�ciaal Mut�.��l 01-413U-050-50 7i F'rinci pal Mut�_sal 01-433'�.*-07+D-?� 71 Prir,cioa? Mut�.�al 1�-4132-060-60 .SJ.3 Tc�tals Temo Check N�.�mber 71 . Terno Check NurnSer 7w --" "72�K'i.iblic Emol�Ret-Assr�. " " ' -- --01�2�74 - " _ 7i �'ubiic .Ernal �et pssn 01-423�-1 I�-1+2s 7� �'�abl ic Ernol Re�t Assr� @1-4131-�C�0-L4� 216 Tr�tals iemo Check htumber 72 Terno Check N�.traber 73 _ ."" 73 Fublic'Ernol""Ins F"raararn --_....—@I"=�@74 . ._..-- • ---.�__----- .. . 73 ��ublic Ernol Ins Prcnrara 01-4131-110-1a 73 F'�abiic Emot Ir+s F�ro�rarn �1-4f32-Q�:'_Q;-�+� "'�"'7�"G'ubl'ic"'EYnol"Ins-Rrc�orarn-� Q1=4"13I=04Q�-4Q---""'--�- 73 Gublic Ernol Ins F'rogratn QrS�A13S��J�'�JQ� 73 Gublic Er��o3 ins Nraor�m �1-4131-07ki--7Qs - -'�"""73 Rubl'ic'Emol'"Ins'Grdorarn �--""'"'-05=�iT3.C"=105�=TS— ----" 73 �'ublic Emol Ins G�roorarn 1�-4131-060-60 73 G�,t61ic Eraal Ir�s F'rc�4rarn Q�8-4131-�Q��h-�0 657 Sc+taie ier�lo Gheck N�.tpther 73 Temo Check. NumSer 74 74 Erad Ranar� inc " 01-433k�-49�1-7�i 74 Er�d Raoan Sr�c 01-433k"1-490--75� 148 T��tals Temo Chack N�.imber 74 Teozo Check N�srnber- 75 75 Richfi2:d 5C�d 01-43;@-4'j�-�� %J T_�tals Terno Check N�.�rnber 75 Temo Chec� �!�.�mhe•r 76 7E Seai ma=}er �t1-44�2-Q�5�-S41 7E T.-�ta l s a erno Check N�.�raber- 7E. Carnrnent s ,t�_il orern ,� u 1 prern t u 1 orerr� tul orem auo prern - .._.. _ . aug orern aua prern ' ' aua prern " "' "' aug orem --- - •• auo pretn ---�.._ -'aug orem auo prern aug arern '._-� auq prem•_—_..__.. a�.ig orern a+.co preta rors SQ�4 t i res 3�;� = r_�d asoh�2t F'aoe 1� Rma�rr�t 27. 0k� 21. 97 43. 63 ��.26 � 1:'_. 8Q� 96. @0 9. +dk� I2. 4�0 117. Q�0 _._ ._.___ 2,'�QO. 6? -------,_._. _ 1. 64�. 38 3. 686. �G6 __ _..._____._.._'_" r..'7%�J. 6J __ "_'"'�_ 1. 672. 46 53�. 4a _ �_I':'7m0: fi.�.i --. A 373.11 ;�Q�O. 6.�.r 13.094.@� `- 3�.7i - -- 364. A7 397. 58 1 E. 51 16. �1 89.46 89.46 � � 14 J�_i �7 Clairns List Mon 1Q� AM Citv of Mendr_�ta He. ..s Terno Check Number 76 Terno. Check Number l.'endor Name Accaunt Code Temo Check Ni.irnber 77 77 Schurnachers Inc �1-4330-215-7� 77 Sch�unachers Inc �01-433�t1-215-70 154 Tut�ls Terno Check N�.�rnber 77 - Temo Check Nurnber 78 78 Shaw Lurnber Q1-4305-Q:�a-5N 78 - - - - - --• -- - - - Tc�tals Temo Check Ni.irnber 78 Teino Check Nurnber � 79 -� '-' ��' � --` 79 S�utheast Tawino 01-4330-440-20 7'3 Tc�tals Terno Check N�.�rnber 79 Terno Check N�.�mber 90 -' -80 Sauthview Chev '-" -'" -�0T=4330-49@-50 -'-'" - - " B0 -- '� Tc�ta 1 s Temo Check N�.irnber �-� v -' 80---- � ----� � �� Terno Check Nurnber 91 81 Southview Garder� Cer�ter nCS��iJJ7-�JO'J�D 81 T��tals Terno Check N�.�rnber 81 Terno Check Nurnber 82 8� St G'aul Gic�neer F�ress 01-4490-07Q-7a 82 T��t�ls Terno Checl< Number• B� Terno Check Nurnber 83 93 Star Tr-ib�_ir�e � �l.1-4490-�t17�c1-7@ 8� Tatals Terno Checli �l�.irnber 83 Terno Check Paurnber 84 Carnrner�t s solvs disc solvs tawina o�rt5 3N2 SOZVS ernol ad ernol ad F'aoe 13 Rmc��.rr�t 130. 46 �. 45cr 128.01 6. 65 6. 65 42. 6Q 42.00 -• --- •--- - -- --93.17 ' --�. �3. 17 153. 2� 1SJ. 2Q1 441. 50 441. 5� 439. 45 438. 4� 14 J�. ?? Clairns List M_m 7.� + AD? Citv of Rtendot� He .ts Terno Chec� ��.irnbe*� 84 Temo. Check N�.unber Vend� �r� Narne Acca�.int Cade 84 State ?reas�.�rer �d1-�315 84 State Treasurer Q�1-3615 168 Tr_�tals Terno Check N�.�rnber 84 � ' �� Temo Check '�1i.trnber 95 85 Streicners 01-43@5-@2@-2c� . g J . _ _ ._ ..__. __ e _ ""... _ . . . _ Totals Terno Check N�.irnber BS Cornrnent s 2nd atr s/chos adrn fee solvs Raoe 14 Rmc� �_rr�t 3. 377. 45 135. lOcr 3. 24::. 35 131. 37 IJS. J% Terno Chec4 N�.imSer 86 "-"-" "' "--'---' ' ' ""' ' ' '- - ' 86 Ur,ifarrns Ur�lirnited 01-4410-020-�@ soivs 1.88�1.32 . 86 1. 89@. 92 . Tc�tals Terno Check Nurnber B6 _ Ternp Check Nurnber 87 ! --- ' 87 Vicon Inc - - -- -- • - ------- --- ...- -� -- -- --- --- ----- —... . 27=4460=72i=Q�0-----"-- "-' ovrnt 2 t i Isens'----'- '-' '"' �0�,-386:75 --- — _ . 87 �@Q�. 986. 75 - -- - ---- - .. . -•- -- ----- ----•------------------- - -- -- -- ----�--•_ - -'�Totals Terno Check'N'�_�rnber '-""" "-'-87"---"-'-""" '- Terno Chec�C N�.unber 88 - 88 Wilb�.�r Ellis Co 01-433Qt-215-70 solvs 1.933.61 • 88 -- - - -----•--._..._..__.. - � - - -- - - 1.933.61 ' Tatals Terno Check N�.imber 88 Temo Check N�_vnher 83 ' " -'-" ' " - " ' - 89 Zee Medical Svc 01-4.i�J�¢�JY�-J� SOZVS 89 Zee Medical Svc 01-430,:i-Qi70-7Q� solvs 89 Zee Medica'_ Svc 15-43�c�5-Q�60-60 solvs �G% Totals Terno Check Nurnber 89 9194 6r�and Tr,t a'_ 27. S 5 27.15 27.17 81 . 47 1, 424. 446. 83 MANUAL CHECKS 16510 1,250.00 Hugo Blackfelner easement 16511 116.75 Chris °sser exo reimb 16512 75,27 Guy Kullander �" �65�� 602.82 U. S. Post Office 2nd qtr sewer 16517 s,s��:�9 4��aC��iQ�� E0� Assn �y�SpaYro�i 16518 400.U0 MSF distr tournament regr ' ' --" 16519 100.00 " wemens softball regr , 16521 17.29 PERA 7/4 payroll 16522 9,818.60 " " . - ��16523 310.00 Great 4lest L b A " 16524 965.0� ICMA RT " 16525 90�.00 Mlnn �lutual " ' - " '' - �-�--" "-' 16526 -245.00 MSR� " -' 16527 416.4� Dakota County " 16528 405.00 Dakota Bank " - - - -•- -- � - — - -- ---- •-`---" -�--I6529 —'S2,745.69 Payroll a(c -- - " - --- �- - - - - ---------- ------•-73; 720".Ol " -- - - — - - - - G. G. 1,456,,156.84 m � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 1 1, 1997 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Kim Blaeser, Senior Secretar�� SUBJECT: Recognition of Girl Scout Gold Award Recipients DISCUSSION The City was recently informed by Ms. Laura Hedlund, of the Girl Scout Council of St. Croix Valley, that three outstanding young women, who all reside in the City, deserve recognition from the City of Mendota Heights. Ms. Janelle R. Den Bleyker, Ms. Jennine M. Huber and Ms. Kasey Tunell have earned the Girl Scout Gold Award, the highest award in Girl Scauting. To achieve this leadership award, these young women had to meet three prerequisites in the areas of leadership, skill development and career exploration and perform a significant leadership which requires at least 40 hours, meets a community need and extends over a four month period. ACTION REQUIRED The Mayor and City Council should formally recognize Ms. Janelle R. Den Bleyker, Ms. Jennine M. Huber and Ms. Kasey Tunell, by presenting each of the young women with a Certificate of Recognition commending them for their remarkable efforts in achieving the highest award, the Girl Scout Gold Award, in Girl Scouting. June 18, 1997 City of Mendota Heights Mayor's Office 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, NIN 55118 Re: Recognition of Gold Award Recipients Girl Scout Councii of St. Croix Valley 400 South Robert Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55107 (612) 227-8835 Voice/TTY 1-800-845-0787 Voice(fTY FAX (612) 227-7533 Three outstanding young women deserve recognition from the City of Mendota Heights. Janelle R. Den Bleyker, Jennine M. Huber and Kasey Tunell earned the Girl Scout Gold Award, the highest award in Girl Scouting. Yoi� may war:t to recog7ize these recipients by presenting a plaque, mailing a certificate or personal letter, placing an article in your city newsletter or mentioning the accomplishments of these young women at your next council meeting. Janelle R. Den Bleyker is the daughter of Neil and Cathie Den Bleyker, 1952 Crown Point Drive, Mendota Heights, NIN 55118. Jennine M. Huber is the daughter of Mark and Marsha Huber, 969 Delaware Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55118. Kasey Tunell is the daughter of Bruce and Carol Tunell, 1370 Cherry Hill Road, Mendota Heights, MN 55118. To achieve this leadership award, girls must meet three prerequisites in the areas of leadership, skill development and career exploration and perform a significant leadership project which requires at least 40 hours, meets a community need and extends over a four-month period. A copy of a press release that was sent to local papers is enclosed. It describes the projects the girls completed to earn this award. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, . � -'r �/: /� �. : �r.� G-y��r.G G.,c..L.� <� Laura Hedlund Public Relations Director Enclosure Serving all or parts of Anoka, Chisago, Dakota, Isanti, Pine, Ramsey and Washington (��T counties in Minnesota and Burnett, Pierce, Polk and St. Croix counties in Wisconsin. ■`�' A United Way Agency � � May 21, 1997 For Immediate Release Contact Laura Hedlund or Sally Austin 612-227-8835 1-800-845-0787 Mendota Heights Area Girl Scouts Earn Organization's Highest Award Janelle R Den Bleyker, 7ennine M. Huber and Kasey Tunell, Mendota Heights, were presented with the Girl Scout Gold Award at a recognition event at the College of St. Catherine in St. Paul on May 15, 1997. They were among 48 girls earning this honor in the Girl Scout Council of St. Croix Valley. All of these girls are seniors at Henry Sibley High School. The Gold Award is the highest achievement for girls in Girl Scouting. To achieve this leadership award, girls must meet three prerequisites in the areas of leadership, skill development and career exploration and perfonn a significant leadership project which requires at least 40 hours, meets a community need and extends over a four-month period. For her Gold Award Project, Huber, utilizing her interest in the health field and her Spanish language skills, educated the community of the need for immunizations. She made bi-lingual posters, magnets and flyers that were distributed to schools, community centers and health clinics. For i �r vold �w�u Pruject, Den �leyker w�zted to help per,ple in crisis: She recrui��ed studenis a� school and members of her church to help with donating needed supplies to make a bag of personal toiletry/hygiene items for use by people at the Robet B. Lewis House in Eagan. For her Gold Award Project, Tunell, who was concerned about the lack of youth proramming at her church, organized and taught special activities to children ages 4-7 every Sunday for six months. She included ways for the youth to interact with the elderly church members, along with organizing the youth's participation in Christmas and Easter pageants. The Girl Scout Council of St. Croix Valley serves over 19,000 girls and 6,000 adult volunteers in eleven counties in eastern Minnesota and western Wisconsin. The mission of the council is to help �rls grow up to be caring, competent and confident women. � � �:.0 ity o� 1Viendota;::� Heights July 2, 1997 '� , � Ms. Janelle R. Den Bleyker �=_-':` �,;.' 1952 Crown Point Drive ��:;��; Mendota Heishts, MN 55118 = - -� �- Dear Ms. Den Bleyker: �=� =�� •- �t..:- .�::_ =_ '- f� i' ..r_ j; . The City received notice from the Girl Scout Council of the St. Croix Valley that you have -,: . recently received the Girl Scout Gold Award, the highest award in Girl Scouting. The Girl '.Y.•. : ,� Scout Council has sugoested ihat the City recognize this sianificant award �,� ;.� :_ ';i.-:;:s:; -;��.�t-,;�: : . ,;, .�,�;.:;. The Ciry certainly wants to take advantage of this opportunity to rec�gniz� yGur achievements. We would like to invite yoii to csr July 15, 19y? �=ty Council mteting�in�order that the City --' ... �;. may present you with a Gertific�te of Recognirion in honor of your recent achievement. :`Y n �: Y� .:�^� L l �i'� � rutii�'. - The Council meeting on July 15, 1997 v��euld begia at 7:30 p.m. and the.�ognition ce.emonv��=� �.: �.. � would be scheduled early •in the agenda. Please contact Kim Blaeser., Senio� Sec:e:ary, to R.S.V.P. Kim may answer any questions that you may have about the�meeting. `«=- I would like to take this opportunity to c��mend you for your efforts in the Girl Scouts, it is a remarkable achievement to obtain the Girl Scout Gold Award. Your contributions to the community through yonr leadership proj�ct are exemplary. I hope that�you will ioiu us in - recognizing and honoring your achievement on July 15, 1997. .�_� Sincerely, � �L ��+.� c�, ��-- Kevin Batchelder Ciry Administrator KLB:kkb cc: City Council � 1101 Victoria Curve - Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 (612) 452-1850 - FAX 452-8940 :; . �: � syr� .�._' _ �:::�. .. '�;iK " �f?_�SF � � :=� ��:� - C ity o� � 1Viendot�a:��Heights ... �.. ��.�._�:: July 2, 1997 Ms. Jennine M �iuber 969 Delaware Avenue Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Ms. Huber: The City received. notice from the Girl Scout Council of the St. C recendy received the Girl Scout Gold Award, the highest award i Scout C�uncil has suggest�d ;hat the City recog��zF ��s significai � �alley that you have �Scouting. T7ie Girl :� .... �-...,.:.- -: . s -. .:`�—•iri:=' The City certainl� �ants to take advantage of this oppc,rtunity te recognize.your achi�vements. � _ =i�?c.,is%;.�:.�{ '�iVe wouid iike to :r�vite }�ou :o our July 15; ? 997 i ity Counci��m�tmg`in`:��eftharthe' C�fiy �- ��- ' � ��- ^ '- - � •. a3�?:.� :-v may present yau with a Certificate of Re�.��nition in h�nor of yout,receniaclievement_ �. M�..e�..�=Tl�,�� '1 he Co�nci� ��eet��n Juiy�-'r5; � 1997 wauhi-be�i�-at•7:30� p:m:` j;a�Ythe �,•ogniu��eerem��y� ".� ' .�� : jNould be s:.i�eduled early in the agenda. P:eas� conact Kim Blaeser;�Semor Secretary, io � •:�,�--�:. R.S.V.P. Iii.� may a.nswer any questi�ns tbat yoti may have aboui ilie meetina. _ _^�- ,� t7 � + .�.�c"''�.' y' ' ,y:w� �`��.:.. I would like to take this opportunity to commend you for your efforts in the Cirl Scouts; it�is a ::;�.� = :, :_. remarkable achieve.ment to obtain the Girl Sc�ut Gol� Award. Yoi� contnbutions to the community tt:aough your l.eadership project nre exenglary. _ I hoge:that.�ou_will.join.us in_ � recognizing and honoring your achievement on July 15, 1997. �'��' Y;_`�:�� , , � r�;:�: � r= Sincerely, `'�'� �� - ��rt, �c�� r �.-�.�.� . - .�.�. ��.�- _ . Kevin Batchelder Ciry Administrator KI.B:kkb cc: Ciry Council 1101 Victoria Curve • Mendota Heights, N1N • 55118 (612) 452-1850 • FAX 452-8940 _ ;-� . ��=:': ,._� -- :`�:�:.. Cit o� ::... .:��: �^ ;4.� y .i �l�t. 1h ��.5�"� ;;,,., :��f � � �� 1Viendota Heights �.: �:�. . :� ::w,. :�� ;;_ :� :: .; �... ..: ._., ; . _ - - _� - :;:: . .: `'� ` �� :��-. �. �.. :�:: Juiy 2, 1997 �:�� • � ; . . : ":` ��:: Ms. Kasey Tunell '=�=°' �'�T�+-�' ,Y .`.•�, t Y�.Ji � 1370 Cherry Hill Road _ == ��:. �s.. Mendota Heights;. MN.55118 .; ;�; - � �: �4r �e!~v:.i�Y_A. <�. Dear Ms. Tunell: �''��'<� " �� =�` "i'�"r - - ` V+c'„�� ^ � -. The City received�notice from - �-�: •-- recently received the Girl Sco �"••- r'in,ra:=�3tr SC011t COl1IlC1I �ISS�SII��CS�_ the Girl Scout Council of the St. Croix `�alley ihat yeu have ut Gold Awazd, the highest award in Girl Scouting. The Girl thai the City recognize this si�ificant award. � —Fs�..:�v ;:R'"•�-: "Rd;:�� The City certainly; wants to take advantage of this opportunity to. rec.ognize your achi�v�ments . . � �, :.�,;.:�:: �• -�. =� -.We would like to�invi� yo�u�-,t,��our�July�15, 1997 City� Council meet�n� in cin�r�ihai thG C:ry�� '- may present youVwifli`a Certificate of Recognition in honor �f your recent achiersement. ' . Kr:,u.. �=� �. : r�,-•.,, x . . ,-�%�, �.--'_.�``� � .�-- - The Council mee+�ng=or�Juir;15; 1997� would begin at 7:30 p.m. and tne recog�ition cere:nony�: : . .. ••�a_ .�,....,;��;.. �-would be schednle� eariy,m the agenda. Please contact Kim Blaeser, Senior Secr�tary, tc � -�::.::��:_f:��:�. R.S.V.�. Kim ma}r.answer any questions that you may ha-re about the meetiu�. 't'•;,:�M.µ .F ^`�. t�y;�;'l� i��. .- Rr�. ..si(+ia:J-• I would like to take this opportunity to commend you for your efforts in the Girl Scauts, it is a remarkable achievement to'obtain the Girl Scout Gold Award.. Your contributions �o the - . . community through your_teadership project are exem�;ar.;� ... T_b.cr c..tt31 you. �+ill �a:n. u� in ._.:_ <.._. � recognizing and honoring your achievement on July �5, 1997. �y� .. '.�{: • Sincerel - �3�' y� =iF. ..�-�._ ��c.��-- � r : (�,�,,'v�'� Kevin Batchelder City Administrator KLB:kkb cc: City Council �. 1101 Victoria Curve • Mendota Heights, NIN • 55118 (612) 452-1850 • FAX 452-8940 � 1 r ;�:: a . �� .. � � y J Deli & Ice Cream Mendoca Plaza - 7S0 Highway t 10 Phone: 612-405-9099 Mendota Heighu, MN 55120 Fax: 612-40S-9Q97 Juiy 15, 1997 City of Mendota �-Ieights. Mr. Mayor and City Council 1 1 O1 Victaria Gurve Mendota Heights, MN 551 I$ Dear Mr. Mayar and City Council Members: �� r Y `�! ' � �� Once again, Ziggy"s has an opportunity to do something fun, for, and with, our community. My apologies for the tardiness in bringing this issue to yowr attention, however, it came to my attention just yesterday. I was apprQached by a regular customer and citizen of Mendota Heights who requested that Ziggy's host a birthday party far her daughter. in attendance would be local citizen's, family and friends. This would be a very small gathering of invited family, friends and neighbors; it is not private, however, at the sarne time there v+Jill be no public marketing or direct mail solicitation of any kind. we warit this ta be a local gatheririg only. This event is tentatively scheduled for Monday, .�uly 28, 1997. There v�aill be no "hoopla" surrounciing this event, namely, no barbecue, stage, security, banricades, etc. ?'his is sirnply a bi��thday party which wauid include locai cor��munity members. A Iocai resident who happens to be a musici�n and regular customer wauld l.ike to perform for this bi��thday party aisc� in honor of her daughter's birthday. She wo�..z�d iike to perform with her three other band members and we have the ideal location artd setup to accorrunodate her and host the party. Zi�;g�'s wouid like ta invi#e some �oyai customers ta come and join the fun too. i am requesring that t��:is individual and her band perform outside the cafe and am requesting the City Council's app►roval on this. I intend to follow all required tem�,s and conditians as set forth by the City and, af course, will obtain another insurance certificate to list the City as an additional insured for this small event. To recap, I am only requesting approval on live autdoor music for this accasion. All other business will continue as usual at Zi�gy's that evenirig. All other merchants will be norified and invited if approved by the City. Please note that "Oid .America" has closed and Anna Smith Salon is closed on Monday's. Those are the iwo business directly next to us. I wili aiso obtain a Ietter of approvai from Paster Enterprises for this occasion. As aiways, I wiil assure yau that thi , party will be conducted in a most professional manr�.er, as in the past. To reiterate, my apologies for this short norice. I did indeed phone Patrick Hollister as soon as the request was made to ask permission and what needed to be done. I did not hear anything until I phoned back again at 4pm today and was told that ' could not do anything relative to this party since it was too late to obtain City Counci� ,ppraval or di�cussion by the Ciiy Cauncil. ;N �" Page two..... Mr, Mayor and City Council Members I was unaware of a meeting today, however, I do not feei this should warrant a meetir�g or votes since it wil.l be a small birthday pariy. To be on the August 5th agenda simply U�iti nat work. Thank you for y kind considerarian af this matter. r- 5incerely, r' . Mack Owner Ziggy's Deli & ice Gream • �' _ NAME C?F GROUP,• "CELEBRATORS" TYPE OFMUSIC.• LIGHT COfINTRYR'OCK & OLDIFS L?ATE: MCJNL7A };.JIJL Y' 2&, 199� TIME.� 6.-34 PM - 9.�30 PM ES�`TMATED 1V�Ih,i�3ER OFA77'ENDEFS,• ,50-14Q�?) " , ► �r ,. r �. . , � � : i � :�i � � � ��G� S � ��U YJ � �� C Co S�� Q�J L� N}� S a . '� � � �� O� � � � � 3 :� � .� ��,��a �e�g�� , �s>> os�_..sa>sA<-��..nr-4.n� ..�_w...� .i�..i.�'�1�:.�/.��+.�.�'�N .tw+.v�N_aw¢V.inr.�r ...... .c-1�u..CY�w.�.wvw'nmcwt�awC��.w July 1 �, 1997 Larry Mack ZiQ�y's Deli 7�0 vlendota Plaza Mendota Heights, IvIN 5� 120 Dear Mr. Mack: This letter is in response to your telephone inquiry on July 14, 1997 reQarding your idea for an outdoor music event in front of ZiQ�y's. Only the City Council has the authority to approve or deny any such event. Staff has not been authorized to give permission for any such activity. Please see the attached letters sent to you on April 2, 1997, particularly the following clauses: In regards to outdoor eatinQ tables, �. �10 outdoor live music or other outdoor live entertainment will be permitted. and in regards to the Friday, May 30, 1997 event, 1�. The arantin� of this Special Event Permit in no way indicates that a similar permit will be aranted for any similar event in the future. Requests for permission for any future outdoor event must be submitted in writing to City Hall si:c working days before the Council meetina at wish you intend to appear. Any approval by the City Council for any future event, if �ranted, will likely entail conditions similar to those enumerated in the enclosed letters. � Sincerely, � `I �•�� G - � ' � �''��`.� Patrick C. Hollister Administrative Assistant 1101 Vict�ria Cunre •`�iendota Heia;�is. �I� • 5�l ls (512) 4�2-18�0 • F,�X 452-8940 S :i Apri12, 1997 Larry Mack Ziggy's Deli 750 Mendota Plaza Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Mr. Mack: � lty O� 1Viendota Heights on April 1, 1997 the Mendota Heights City Council voted to grant a temporary experimental license to Ziggy's at Mendota Plaza for the placement of 6 tables outdoors fc�r eating under the following conditions: 1. The license commences as of May 1, 1997 and ends October 15, 1997. 2. The license may be revoked by the Council at any time if the Council receives a valid written complaint about the tables. In such case the Council will give a 10-day notice, during which time you must remove the tables from the front of the store. The outdoor area must provide sufficient access to all the stores in the mal( for pedestrians, and shall be maintained at all times in a clean, attractive, and safe condition. 4. No food or beverage sales, storage, or preparation may occur outdoors. 5. No outdoor live music or other outdoor live entertainment will be pernutted. The granting of this license for the summer of 1997 in no way indicates that a similar license will be granted for the summer of 1998 or beyond. The license has been granted on a purely experimental trial basis for this summer. Thank You, �� f Patrick C. Hollister Administrative Assistant �� 110:t Victoria Curve •1�Iendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452• 1850 A � 1�3T C�� a 11►1 �� "� ��t� 1 i'Q` � ��.r."�M � Agril2, 1997 Larry Mack Ziggy's Deli 75C? Mendota Plaza Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Mr. Mack: C)n April l, 1997 the Mendata Heights City Council voted to grant a temporary experimentai license to Ziggy's at Mendota Plaza to hold an outdoar ceiebration featuring autdaor live music and an outdoar barbecue on Friday, 2VIay 30, I997. This license is for the event as praposed by Mr. Mack before the Council on April 1, 1997 under the fol�owing conditions: l. Ziggy's shall submit a detailed plan of the event to Paster Enterprises, who shall then approve of this plan and send a Ietter to the City of Mendota Heights indicating their approvat by Friday, April 25, 1997. 2. The event shall take place in front af Ziggy's store and shall not interf`ere with the free access by pedestrians ta any ather business in the mall. 3. The event shail cammence no eaadier than 8:30 a.m. on May 30, 1997 and shall cease no Iater that 11:00 p.m. on May 30, 199'7. 4. The outdoor live rnusic shall commence no earlier than 6_00 p.m. on May 30, 1997 and shall cease no tater than I0:00 p.m. on May 3Q, 1997. 5. Ziggy's shall take appropriate measures to periodically pick up trash during ths event and to remave all trash from the area after the event. 6, Ziggy's shall provide adequate outdoar toilet facilities during the event, 7. 2iggy's shall be allowed to cordon off that area af the parking lot in which the event takes place from 11.30 a_m. to 1Q:30 p.m. 8. Ziggy's shall prahibit those who attend from bringing alcobol to the event. 9. Ziggy's shall abide by alI apgropriate State health regulations regarding the preparation and handling of food and beverages. .....� 110). Victoria Curve • IViendota Heig,hts, 1'ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 10. Ziggy's shall name the City of Mendota Heights as an insured party on the liabiiity insurance far the event and shall submit a copy of the Certificate of Insurance to the City by April 25, 1991. I l. Ziggy's shall contact the Mendota Heights Potice Department by Friday, April 25, 1947 about security and traffic concerns during the event. Ziggy's may at the discretion af the Police Department he required to take specific rneasures including but not limited to the hiring of an off-duty police afficer during all ar part of the event. 12. Ziggy's shall be allowed one temporary sign on the site far the two days immediately preceding the event. Ziggy's shall remove this sign immediately after the event. I�3. Nt� foad orbeverages shatl be served in breakable cantainers for the duration of the event. 14. The granting of this Special Event Perrnit does not entail specific permissian for each and every eiement of the event. 15. The granting of this Special Event Permit in no way indicates that a similar pernut wiil be granted for any similar event in the future. Gaod luck with your event. Thank You, �� „/. C�� Patrick C. Hollister Adrninistrative Assistant cc: I?ennis Delmorn, Chief af Police CITY 4F MENDOTA HEIGHTS July I I, 199'7 �� TO: Mayor Mertensatta Darrell Anderson �evi� Batchelder Jim Danielson Lany Shaughnessy FR4M: Patrick C. Hollister, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Meeting with Tempco O�cials on July 1 I, 1997 On July 11, 1997 at 2 p.m. Jerry Lansink, Daniel Cronen, and Mike Olson of Tempca, Darrell Anderson of The Design Partnership, Ltd., and Patrick C. Hollister met at the Tempco building to discuss Tempco's building pernut request and the 11�aXor's concerns abaut the appearance of the Tempco building. After a brief tour of the building, Mr. Hollister presented the follawing primary aesthetic gaals af the Mayor at this time: 1. The elvnination of at ieast one garage door an the southeast carner of the building 2. The eiimination af one curb cut an the south side and its regiacement with landscaping 3. The replacement of the Russian Olive trees along the south of the building with piantings that would screen the blzilding mare effectively 4. The elimina#ion af the driveway alang the sauth side of the building 5. The ciasing aff of the raikoad right-of-way fram the parking Iot Mr. Hollister added that there were also minor cancerns sucb as consistency of exterior colors of the building. Mr. Hollister also said that the City was potentially interested in cantributing fatziancially to these improvements, but that specific dalIar figures wouId have to be discussed at the Council meeting on July 15. � r.`a i Mr. Lansink said that he could accept items l, 2, 3 and 5 above if the right cost-sharing agreement were made between the City and Tempco, but that he would not be able to do item 4, the elimination of the driveway, because the president of the company uses that driveway to get to the building. Mr. Lansink added that the southeast garage door would have been eliminated with earlier plans to square off that corner of the building with an addition, but that upon leaming of the requirement for sprinkling the new addition, and upon learning the cost of that sprinkling, Tempco had decided that it was too expensive to put the addition on. Mr. Hollister said that it may be possible for the City to alleviate the cost of the addition to square off the building. Mr. Lansink also said that in meetings with United Properties Tempco had been told that anyone who purchased the land and the building from Tempco would tear down the building, break up the pazking lot and start over, and thus the building was worth nothing in terms of resale. Mr. Lansink said that therefore any money spent on mere�y improving the aesthetic appeazance of the site that had no practical benefit to the day-to-day operation of the business would be of no value to Tempco. Mr. Lansink also said that most of Tempco's customers were outside of Minnesota, had never seen the building and did not base their purchasing decisions on the appearance of the building. Mr. Lansink thus implied that aesthetics were purely the City's concem, not Tempco's. The Tempco officials also denied that they had ever used the railroad right-of-way for truck or car access, and added that they wou�d appreciate it being closed off since they view it as a security hazard. Mr. Lansink said that sometimes trucks have to back up to the railroad right-of-way but they never use the right-of-way for access to or from the site. Mr. Cronen added that one night manager reported that a car was pazked on the right-of-way and sped away when the driver saw the night manager approaching. . Mr. Hollister then told Tempco that the building permit request was once again on the agenda for the evening of July 15, and that the Mayor was willing to discuss his concems with Tempco Tuesday morning in hopes of getting some groundwork estab�ished for the evening meeting. Mr. Lansink said that meeting Tuesday morning would be a good idea, and added that he felt the meeting should take place at the Tempco building. Mr. Hollister agreed to pass on the invitation to the Mayor to visit the Tempco building at 9:00 Tuesday morning. (The Mayor has since accepted the invitation.) The three ' Tempco officials then went back into the building. Mr. Hollister and Mr. Anderson then walked azound the building and reviewed the -� discussion with Tempco. Mr. Anderson made some interesting observations about the Tempco site: � 1. Mr. Anderson suspects that the Tempco building is not in compliance with ADA in terms of proximity of handicapped parking spaces to entrances and the lack of wheelchair ramps, particularly on the west end of the building. Mr. Anderson is under the impression that by federal mandate Tempco as a non-conforming building is required to spend at least 20% of its remodeling budget on bringing the building up to compliance. Mr. Anderson sees a potential deal with Tempco; if Tempco adds a wheelchair ramp and a handicapped pazking space to the west entrance to the building, the president of the company would be able to get to the main office without walking through the shop floor, and the southern drive along the building could be eliminated. Mr. Hollister and Mr. Anderson have not had a c�ance to run this idea by Tempco. 2. Mr. Anderson also feels that the pazking in the rear of the building is inefficient, and that if the parking lot were properlX striped, perhaps with one or more landscape islands in the middle, Tempco could fit many more cazs in the reaz parking lot and eliminate the need to pazk in front. Currently the cars park around the edge of the rear lot, leaving a big gap in the middte which may be necessary for truck access. Mr. Anderson said that it would be better for the cars to pazk in the middle of the lot. Mr. Anderson also suspected that the pazking lot did not conform to existing setback requirements. Again, Mr. Anderson and Mr. Hollister have not yet suggested parking lot redesign to Tempco. Mr. Hollister then returned to City Hall and talkec� to Mr. Shaughnessy about Tempco's statement that the building has no resale value. Mr. Shaughnessy felt that the statement on Tempo's part that if they ever sold the property tl�ey would get no more compensation than the value of the land was an exaggeration, and that surely the building must be worth something. The Mayor has confirmed that he will visit the Tempco building at 9 a.m. TuesdaX morning. _ 6 s� '� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS , � ' MEMO July 10, 1997 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Patrick C. Hollister, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Tempco Building Permit Discussion At the July 1, 1997 meeting of the City Council, representatives of Tempco appeazed before the Council to discuss their application for a building permit. Tempco wishes to place a 30' x 39' x 12' addition to the elevation of the existing building to accommodate a new machine. The Council continued the discussion of the builc3ing permit to the July 15, 1997 meeting in order to allow time for discussions with Tempco about possible improvements to the site as a whole, with the possibility of financial participation on the part of the City if a plan for improvements could be mutually agreed upon. The City of Mendota Heights has retained Darrell D. Anderson, Architect and Executive Vice President of The Design Parknership, Ltd. as a consultant to provide ideas to the City and Tempco for improvements to the site which would not be cost-prohibitive. On July 7, 1997 Mayor Mertensotto, Mr. Anderson, Ms. McMonigal, and Staff inet to review Tempco's building pemut application and made a site visit to the Tempco building. Mr. Anderson then scheduled a meeting with Tempco officials for 2 p.m. on July 11, 1997 at the Tempco building. Staff will also attend this meeting anc� will have a report of the results of this meeting for Council review Tuesday evening. The Tempco officials will once again be present at the July 15, 1997 meeting of the City Council to request a building permit for this roof addition. Please see the attached memo, letter of intent, and plans submitted for the July 1, 1997 meeting of the City Council. Additional information should be available Tuesday evening. Council Action Required Discuss the building permit request with the Tempco officials and provide direction to Staff as to how to proceed. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 25, 1997 T0: Mayor, City Council and City Ad inf�� tor FROM: Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer �� a SUBJECT: Exterior Modification at 2475 Highway 55 - Tempco Manufacturing INTRODUCTION , Tempco Manufacturing is proposing to install a new piece of equipment in their building which will require creating a 30' x 39' x 12' high projection above the elevation of the existing building. (Please see site plan for location). DISCUSSION Zoning Ordinance No. 401, Section 4.17(1) requires City Council app�oval prior to staff issuance of the building permit due to the zoning of the Tempco property. The proposed structure will not exceed the Zoning Ordinance structure height of 45 feet for the "I" District. The provided section drawing shows the top of the addition to be 34' above grade. The proposed addition will be constructed and painted to match the existing structure materials and color as per the plans submitted. RECOMMENDATION Since the plans demonstrate no violations of the Zoning Ordinance, I recommend approval of the plans as submitted. ACT10N REQUIRED If the City Council wishes to implement the above recommendation, a motion should be passed authorizing the Code Enforcement Officer to issue a building permit which would allow exterior building modifications at 2475 Highway 55 - Tempco Manufacturing PRB:kkb �vit Lv J! ii�+ 1�V! 11�1 1G1llivv � .�. WasQwi�da Praaorien Mam! 8tsrrrpngs. �lraet Meta1 Fabric:eon and AasemoUee +.•.. a• , V 1 L : J 1 3 .! Ternpca Mfg. Co. lnc� 2�75 H�nsy 53 sa 7�its nc s��YicE SL l�at�, MN 'lSiZO 7(tbph011e 612-�5$-144i Ftor4 Fs]t 512-452-1125 Bac�t �'a7c 812-a52�?08 c�� vF r�oTA aEzca�s 1141 vICTOR2a CUR.vE MENDOTA HEIGI3TS MN 55118 PAUL R. BERG, 6-2d--9� 1Et�fPCO HAS PURCHASED ANI3 ZS PZ�ANNI�iG T4 ZNSTAZL A 1000 TDN PDNCB PRESS. DUE TO ITS S22E IT WILL REQUIRE SOME MODIFICATION OF THE BUILDiNG. ENCLOSED ARE PRiNTB SHQWING THE PR{7P4SED CHANGES. TEMPCp MFG CO �� f-. �' `.r , �Y�L.ANSINi�'' S�t OFFICE MANAGER 0 �� s� � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 11, 1997 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Patrick C. Hollister, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Centre Pointe Office Building Roseville Properties Discussion Please see the attached modified Building Permit request from Roseville Properties. Roseville Properties had received permission from the Council at their June 17, 1997 meeting to build a 42,600 ft2 office building on the 7.95 acre lot on the northeast corner of Centre Pointe Drive and Centre Pointe Boulevard on the following conditions: 1. That City Engineering Staff review and approve the drainage plan and driveway access plan. 2. That the building be completely finished in brick on all four sides similar to and in the same colors as the Gopher One building as represented by Mr. Cullen on the evening of June 17, 1997. 3. That no Variances be granted for parking, although the Council did not deem it necessary to create the "proof-of-parking" spaces shown on the plans at this time 4. That the rooftop utilities be screened to the greatest extent possible 5. That the granting of this Building Permit does not entail permission for any future building permit or subdivision on this same pazcel or its vicinity, each of which must be applied for and approved separately. Mr. Cullen now wishes to adjust the position of the building on the lot slightly to allow parking and entrances on all four sides of the building, realign the access drives, and lower the height of the building. Mr. Cullen is not asking for any other significant changes to the building, and the revised plans still conform to the City Zoning Ordinance. �i Please see the following attached items of public record pertaining to this application: 1. Letter of Intent from Hugh R. Cullen dated 7/10/97 `� 2. A1: Site Plan dated 7/10/97 and provided by Lampert Architects 3. C 1: Grading and Utility Plan dated 7/9/97 and provided by Sunde Engineering 4. C2: Details dated 7/9/97 and provided by Sunde Engineering 5. L 1: Landscape Plan dated 7/10/97 and provided by RJ Ryan Construction 6. A2: Floor Plan dated 7/10/97 and provided by Lampert Architects 7. A3: Exterior Elevations dated 7/10/97 and provided by Lampert Architects 8. A4: Wall Sections dated 7/10/97 and provided by Lampert Architects 9. S1: Footing and Foundation Plan dated 7/10/97 and provided by Stroh Engineering 10. S2: Roof Framing Plan dated 7/10/97 and provided by Stroh Engineering 11. Minutes from the June 17, 1997 City Council meeting Mr. Cullen says that he intends to eventually split the lot and build a second building on the new lot to the east. Mr. Cullen says that he intends to fully conform to the City's zoning ordinance, and that after the lot split and second building both buildings will adhere to setback requirements. Mr. Cullen will attend the July 15, 1997 meeting of the City Council to present his revised proposal and to answer any questions. Council Action Required � Discuss the revised plans with Mr. Cullen. If the Council approves of Roseville Properties' revised plans for the new office building, the Council should authorize Staff to issue a building permit, placing any conditions upon these plans the Council deems necessary. 07/11/97 FRI 10:50 FAX 612 633 9221 ROS�v1LLh Yxur�x'1'1�a � uut �r ' .,� R4SEVILLE PR�PERTIES MANAGEMENT COMPANY July 10, � 1997 Mr. James Danielson, Director of Public Works Mr. Patrick Hollister, Administrative Assistant CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 Re: Centre Pointe Business Park Develapment Gentlemen: VIA FAX In our continual process of review in anticipation of construction of the above, we believe that three minor, yet practical modifications to our appraved development would enhance its viab�ity. We ask that you review them as outlined beIow (and as shown on the revised site plan submitted), and if required, place them on the consent agenda for the Council meeting on July 24th. 1) Our approved plan did not have the curb cuts onto Centre Pointe Blvd. correctly lined up with existing. We have adjusted our layout accordingly. 2) With the change in curb cuts, and the modi.fication required to brick the buiiding on all four sides, we would l�ce to move the building to the east. This would allow for accessible parking on all four sides. We would be relocating appro�nately 42 stalls from the front to the back, however, we would not be increasing the paved surface. area of the site. 3) We would like to reduce the overall height of the building by 1'4" to match the height of the Gopher State building and keep all the buildinas on the block at a consistent height and scale. • Please contact me immerliately with any quesrions. Your continued assistance and support is greatly appreciated. Ve truly yours, Hugh R en Vice President, Development 2575 N. Fairview • Suite 250 • Roseville, MN 55113 •(612) 633-6312 • Fax 633-922I Page No. 15 June 17, 1997 Councilmember Smith suggested that Council set up meetings with potential developers and the city planner. She stated that staff can � make the contacts and coordinate the process, which should begin soon. She further stated that she thinks that the issue is sepazate from the comprehensive plan update and would fall within the more normal duties of the city planner. Administrator Batchelder stated that he feels it appeazs that there will be a realignment of Freeway Road, and if the city is interested in actively looking at development of the northem right-of-way, that means the city is not prepared to release that right-of-way should there be a request for release. Mayor Mertensotto stated that it is clear that the realignment of the intersection would not interfere with the development of Parce136. Councilmember Smith stated that one of the things that Council should consider is to look at the area right around South Plaza Drive to see if additional right of way is needed close to South Plaza. Councilmember Krebsbach stated that timing is important to Mr. Paster and if acquiring Pazce136 helps hun, Council could accommodate him. Councilmember Huber agreed that ultimately Council will probably release Parce136. NSP FRANCHISE Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works Director Danielson regazding renewal of gas and electric franchise agreements with NSP. Discussion on the matter was tabled to July 15. ROSEVILLE PROPERTIES/ Council acknowledged a memo from Assistant Hollister relative CENTRE POINTE to a request from Roseville Properties for authorization for issuance of a building permit for an office building on an eight acre parcel of land located off Centre Pointe Boulevazd. Council also acknowledged a letter of intent, site plan, landscape plan, grading and utility plan and exterior elevations for the proposed structure. Mr. Hugh Cullin, from Roseville Properties, Mr. Glenn Lampert, project architect, and Mr. Tom Ryan, construction contractor, were present for the discussion. Mr. Cullen explained that the proposed 42,300 square foot office building is the second phase of the Centre Pointe office project. He informed Council that the building will be very similar to the Gopher State building immediately to the south. It is his intent to continue � �� Page No. 16 June 17, 1997 with the third phase of the development this yeaz, with more phases y I next year. He informed Council that Roseville Properties is a very ' conservative developer who seeks quality tenants before seeking building permits and future development to the west will also be driven by an office use. Mr. Cullen stated that he is only appearing before Council today to seek approval for the 42,000 squaze foot building and has already signed a letter of intent with two prospective tenants for 17,000 square feet of the structure for occupancy in October. Mr. Lampert reviewed site plans and elevations for the building. Responding to a question from Councilmember Krebsbach, he stated that the heating elements will be in the center of the building so that they cannot be seen. Mr. Cullin stated that he views this as a"Waters" quality development which will be purely office-only property. He informed Council that the proposed structure is a one-story, slab on grade construction with no potential for a second story. Mayor Mertensotto stated that it is very important to finish the structure on all four sides and that Council does not want office- wazehouse facilities in the development. Mr. Cullin responded that he will commit to brick all around the building, the same as the Gopher State brick. Councilmember Krebsbach stated that Council does wants to keep office/warehouse and office/flex in the industrial park and not along T.H. 110. She further stated that the Gopher State building has enhanced the Centre Pointe development. Councilmember Smith stated that she wants to make sure that drainage is addressed and that on site drainage is adequate. NIr. Ryan responded that he has designed the building with interior downspouts and that the drainage plans, which were prepazed by professional engineers, have been submitted to city engineering. He explained that all of the site drainage will be controlled within the parking lot. He briefly reviewed parking, stating that 23 of the required spaces aze shown as proof of pazking, because he would prefer not to put in more blacktop than is needed. Councilmember Smith moved approval of the issuance of a building permit to Roseville Properties for the proposed office building, Page No. 17 ! June 17, 1997 conditioned that the certificate of occupancy will be withheld until � the drainage plan has been reviewed and approved by city �' engineering and further conditioned that all four sides of the building be completed with brick similar to that used on the Gopher state building, that the number of parking stalls required by the Zoning Ordinance will be provided and that the entrance to the parking lot will be constructed in accordance with the submitted plan. Councilmember Huber seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 IVY FALLS LAND DONATION Council acknowledged a letter from the Ivy Hill Townhouse Association offering to donate Lot F of the Ivy Hills Addition to the city. Council also acknowledged an associated memo from Assistant Hollister. NIr. Ralph Oyen was present on behalf of the Association. Mr. Oyen informed Council that the Association has been trying to donate the land to the city for quite a while and came before the Pazks and Recreation Commission about a month ago to discuss the offer. Mayor Mertensotto stated that if the pazcel is accepted as park land dedication and put into the pazk system it would be dedicated for pazk purposes only and can only be used for pazk purposes. Mr. Oyen responded that the original intent for the pazcel when the land was platted was that it be used for recreation purposes. Mayor Mertensotto asked if the city would have a problem about maintenance if the parcel were accepted for passive open space and was not placed in the pazk system. Administrator Batchelder responded that the parcel is a turfed area adjacent to Ivy Falls park and would have to be mowed weekly. Councilmember Smith stated that one of her concerns is that the Parks and Recreation Commission discussed the possibility of soccer fields on the parcel in the future. She asked if the Ivy Hill townhouse community would object to a more active use of the pazcel, such as soccer and whether people have considered the possibility that if the land comes into the pazk system it could be used for a more active use. Mr. Oyen responded that in the past there was some minor comment from two or three people, but since that time there has been no � `.� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS July 11, 1997 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager SUBJECT: Concept Approval of North Kensingtan Pazk Improvements ::• ;i jll Several pians have been developed during the past several yea.rs for improvements to North Kensington Park. Input from the neighbors indicated that a non-active pazk was desired. Council decided that a design plan, described as "a backyard cancept" be develaped. The Park and Recreation Commission recommended that Jaanie Giese, a student at the UniversitX of School of Landscape Architecture, be retained ta prepare preliminary and final plans and spec�eatians. Plans were approved and bids taken which far exceeded the ariginal cast estimates. Bids were nat awarded. A re-evaluation af the project was begun. City Council suggested reducing the amount of area devoted ta native and prairie grasses and incargorating some traditional maintained turf axeas i.n the overall design. A working group, consisting of Councilmember Smith, Parks Commissioner Linnel, City Administratar Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant Patrick I�ollister, and myself met on two occasions to develop a design concept that would keep the original elements of Joanie Giese*s plan, but inciude traditional maintained turf areas. Eiements of the campramised plan are; Madest enlargement of the pond, eastward, to develop a small island for wildlife habitat (buried pigeline not disturbed}. 2. Introduction of natzve pond edge plantings to promote better filtration af starmwater runoff. 3. Wildflawer and prairie grass plantings alang sauth and east side af pand. 4. Establishment of two long berm areas parallel to the shrub plantings that provide habitat and edible berries for wildlife. Planting area would be mulched with '� wood chips and allawed to develap naturally and require n�mimal maintenance. 5. Native tree species will be planted along the trail from Mendota Heights Road to Stockbridge Road. ,�.�, a 6. The original concept of "turf area rooms" would remain. Four such areas, each approximately 100 feet in diameter are planned. Stone benches and picnic tables would be in each "room" . 7. Maintained turf would surround the berm plantings and also separate these areas from the native plantings near the pond edges. �- 8. Turf improvements and a small landscaped planting bed are planned for the south end of the park where the existing trail meets Stockbridge Road to better "tie" the north and south segments of the park together. �:Z�i � � � � �!� i Review and comment on the plan to be presented Tuesday evening. If approved, fmal drawings will be prepared and bids taken for construction in August/September. �" it CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 7uly 14, 1997 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Marc S. Mogan, P.E., Civil Engineer �''�S� SUBJECT: Re-consideration of Contract Award for Sanitary Sewer, Water, and 5torm Sewer Improvements To Serve Pi.ne Creek Estates, Job No. 9304, Imp. No. 93-1 INTRODUCTION: ! At the 7uly 1, 1997 Council meeting, bids and the contract award for the combined TH 110 5outh Frontage Road, and Pine Creek Estates projects were considered. Council awarded the contract for Pine Creek Estates Job No. 9304, Imp. No. 93-1, and T.H. 110 S. Frontage Road., 7ob No. 9610, Imp. No. 96-2, S.P. 1918-98, with the stipulation that the Pine Creek Estates bid be left open for a period of 45 days at which time the Ciry could elect to either delay the 45 day deadline, or reject the project. The City held a preconstruction meeting on July 10, 1997 to discuss the project schedule, and the status of the contract for construction. At that meeting the Contractor, hinted that they might not execute the Contract for these projects if they were split. Rather than pursue other options for construction of the T.H. 110 South Frontage Road improvements, I felt it appropriate to have Council reconsider the award of the Pine Creek Estates portion of this project. PRO.TECT HISTORY: The City of Mendota Heights received a preliminary plat application refened to as Pine Creek Estates from Peter Knaeble to subdivide a portion of Lot 49 of Auditor's Subdivision No. 3, owned by Lloyd and Lucille Walker of 1760 Dodd Road, into three lots. City Council approved the preliminary plat at the November 5, 1991 meeting (Planning Case No. 91-35). City Council subsequently passed Resolution 91-89 approving the fmal plat for Pine Creek Fstates on December 3, 1991. The plat has been recorded for some time. The developer chose not to proceed with any sewer and water improvement serving the lots until such time as the utilities were needed. Mike HIehr has purchased lot 3 from the developer, and is ready to commence home construction contingent upon the installation of sewer and water serving the property. Consequently, the developer has petitioned the City to proceed with the preparation of a feasibility report, followed by plans and specifications for unprovements to serve these properties (see attached). , Frederic and Beverly Peterson, the owner of Auditor's subdivision No. 3, south of Pine Creek Estates, has approached City staff about the possibility of subdividing their property in a similar fashion to the Pine Creek Estates plat. At this time, no formal preliminary plat application has been submitted by Mr. Peterson. It is not apparent as to how many lots would be attained in subdividing Mr. Peterson's parcel. It is conceivable that the Peterson parcel could be subdivided into one additional flag lot, or two additional flag lots if City Council approved variances. � The developer of Pine Creek Estates and the Petersons', owners of Auditor's Subdivision No. 3, mutually agreed that this work would best be accomplished by constructing these facilities as a public improvement project, and distributing the costs proportionately. The City commissioned Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban, (DSLn to prepare a comprehensive study of the superblock area in 1993 refened to at the Somerset Area Studv Inventorv and Anal,Ysis• after the Pine Creek Estates plat was filed. That study identified five potential sanitary sewer access points which could provide sanitary service to the superblock area (see attached). The study identified the Pine Creek Estates connection as the prefened altemative because it is the only location which would provide gravity sanitary sewer service to the lowest topographic areas of the superblock area. SAIVITARY SERVICE OPTIONS: The two undeveloped lots in Pine Creek Estates are flag lots whose buildable home sites are 350 to 450 feet from their frontage with Dodd Road. The existing home at 1760 Dodd Road occupies Lot 1 and already has sewer and water service. Lots 2 and 3 are flag lots served by a long common driveway which provides access to Dodd Road. Sanitary sewer service to the two undeveloped Pine Creek Fstates lots could be provided in three different ways. The first option would be by the installation of separate on-site septic systems. Construction of separate on-site septic systems was deemed unacceptable early on because of the high ground water conditions in the area, amount of tree clearing which would be necessary, and Mendota Heights preference to avoid construction of on-site septic systems whenever possible. The second option would involve constructing separate service connections to the existing sanitary sewer system in the west boulevard of Dodd Road. Construction of separate 4 inch gravity sanitary sewer services to serve these lots are not feasible because there is insufficient fall to construct the service at the required slope between the sanitary sewer main in Dodd Road and the building sites. The third option would involve the construction of an 8" sanitary sewer main extension from the sanitary sewer lacated within the Dodd Road right-of-way to serve these properties, and ` undeveloped Ridder property to the north. This is the best alternative in the long term because it to serve these lots as well as provide the greatest flexibility for providing sanitary sewer service to the undeveloped Ridder property to the north. All engineering considerations support construction of the sanitary sewer main as proposed. The real questions then to be answered are whether or not this is the right time for this project, and if it is economically feasible as proposed. WATER SERVICE OPTIONS: Providing water service to the two undeveloped lots in Pine Creek Estates is not a problem. These lots can be served with separate water services from the main in Dodd Road. �f PRO.TECT STATUS: The owners of the properties mentioned previously submitted a petition and waiver of hearing, which was accepted on April 15, 1994, for the construction of sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer to serve Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Pine Creek Estates and Auditor's Subdivision No. 3 near the northeast quadrant of Dodd Road and Marie Avenue. I prepared and presented a feasibility report to Council which was accepted on August 20, 1996. In that feasibility report, I recommended that all of the atypical construction costs associated with this work be spread out over the entire area served when it develops. Council approved that feasibility report and ordered the preparation of plans and specifications for these improvements. In that feasibility report, I esti.mated that the total project cost would be $75,500. In that feasibility report esti.mate, $24,600 would be assessed against the two lots in Pine Creek Estates, and $50,900 would be recovered by the City in the future by means of a connection charges against cunently undeveloped property at the time it is ultimately served. At that time I recommended that it would be advantageous and desirable to bid this smaller project with another City unprovement project to attain the best unit prices possible through the economies of scale. This project was bid together with the TH 110 South Frontage Road project and bids for the combined projects were opened at City I3all on July 30, 1997. The actual unit price constzvction costs for this work bid by the Contractor came in at $79,291.85, as compared to the estimated project cost of $75,500. Approximately 25 % of this entire bid is attributable to the cost of jacking the sewer across Dodd Road. The City's projected overhead and administrative costs for this project should be closer to 25 %, rather than the 40 % that was estimated in the feasibility report. By utilizing this more realistic multiplier, and scaling back this project ever so slightly, the actual project costs for this work would be approximately $95,000. Distributing these project costs to the two Pi.ne Creek Estates lots according to criteria established in the feasibility report increases their assessments to approximately $14,000 for each lot. The amount that the City would carry until the property develops is approximately $67, 000, or $16,100 more than was estimated in the feasibility report. PRO,TECT OPTIONS• The City has three options to consider for this project. The first option would be to eliminate this work from the contract. This could render I.ot 3 unbuildable under the current conditions, unless there is some other provision which could be made to provide sanitary service. This option has the potential of creating contractual problems in constructing the improvements TH 110 South Frontage Road project as well. . ,' The second option would be to re-bid this work. The time constraints associated with these projects make this option problematic. Furthermore, in my opinion I would not anticipate that there would be any significant cost savings seen if this project were re-bid. r The third option would be to accept the bids and award this portion of the contract. Although this option would increase the project costs to the City, it is the City's best opportunity to complete these projects on schedule. RECONIlVIENDATION• All engineering considerations support construction of the sanitary sewer mai.n as proposed, and for that reason I recommend that Council accept the bids for Sanitary Sewer, Water, and Storm Sewer Improvements to serve Pine Creek Estates, and award Schedule "I-A through I-D" for the Pine Creek Estates portion of the contract, Job No. 9304, Imp. No. 93-1 to Northdale Construction Company, Inc. of Rogers, NIN for their bid amount of $79,291.85. ACTION REQUIRED• If Council wishes to unplement the recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 97-_, RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SAIVITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, AND STREET IlVIPROVEIV�NTS TO SERVE PINE CREEK ESTATES, JOB NO. 9304, IMP. NO. 93-1 & T.H. 110 5. FRONTAGE RD., JOB NO. 9610, IlVIP. NO. 96-2, S.P.1918-98. MSM Attachment P� iJ tl .141 �� .ocA�rrarr SERVICE AVAII.ABILITY SlJRClIARGE AREA � NORTH t ! / / ! �� / 1 � / � F.7C. 9^ VSCP SANITARY � � l � � f !f r , / �x. Ma r / / I , � , t EX. WATER MAIN p' 100' 200' e S y �� s � City of P� �R:��I� ESTATES PHOJN:9304 � II1�R tF: 93-I � t.,. .1 .�.e11C�0�.. ��ASIBILITY REPORT �e1�,�.1�5 DATE. 7t t4/4b .`Ito1 V[CC'4RlA CURVE * MENOOTA HEICd IT'S, MN, 5511a (61z) a52-185a 914.4 �- � ---.�-. LEGE � 883.0 (SANITARY SEWER INVERT) � TAKEN FROM SOMERSET AREA ST' ��Y , INVFNTnRY R ANA1 YSIS n�-1�-q� : City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 97- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SAIVITARY SEWER, WATI�RMAIN, AND STORM SEWER IlVIPRO`'EMENTS TO SERVE TO SERVE PINE CREEK ESTATES, JOB NO. 9304, IlVIP. NO. 93-1 AND SURROUNDING AREAS WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the proposed construction of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, and appurtenant work to serve Pine Creek Fstates Job No. 9304, Imp. No. 93-1, and surrounding areas, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law and the following bids were received complying with said advertisement: PINE CREEK TI3110 S. ESTATES FRONTAGE ROAD CONTRACTOR PRO.TECT `I' PRO.TECT �II' Northdale Construction, Company, Inc. Rogers, MN Brown & Cris, Inc. Lakeville, MN ; Lametti & Sons, Inc. � Hugo, MN Dariner, Inc. South St. Paul, MN G.L. Contracting, Inc. Medina, MN and $79,291. 85 $75,423.05 $83,270.Q0 $102,008.00 $98,210.25 $141,100.45 $155,349.12 $154,938.00 $136,257.50 $150,901.05 TOTAL BID PRO.TECT `I' + �II' $220, 392.30 $230,772.17 $238,208.00 $238,265.50 $249,111.30 WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommended that the low combined bid submitted by Northdale Construction Company, Inc., of Rogers, Minnesota, be accepted. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Tfiat the bids for the above project are hereby received and accepted. 2. That the bid of Northdale Construction Company, Inc., of Rogers, Minnesota, submitted for the construction of the above described improvements be and the same is hereby accepted. 3. That the contract for the Pine Creek Estates portion of the combined project be awarded to Northdale Construction Company, Inc., of Rogers, Minnesota, and that the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver any and all contractors and documents necessary to consummate the awarding of said bids. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 15th day of 7uly, 1997. CITY COUNCII. CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS � ATTFST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor �d 4 r. � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 15, 1997 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Marc S. Mogan, Civil Engineer SUB7ECT: MnDOT Cooperative Agreement No. 76203 T.H. 110 South Frontage Road Improvements DISCUSSION: Staffhas prepared plans and specifications, and received bids to upgrade and extend the T.H. 110 Frontage Road from Lexington Avenue to its alignment parallel with T.H. 110. This project is being done with MnDOT's participation through a Cooperative Agreement. A draft copy of that agreement arrived today, and is enclosed for your review. The agreement stipulates that MnDOT will contribute $25,000 towards the cost of these improvements in the form of a lump sum payment. RECOMMENDATION• In order to expedite the construction of these frontage road improvements, I recommend that Council authorize execution of MnDOT Cooperative Agreement No. 76203 to complete the T.H. 110 South Frontage Road improvements to serve the SuperAmerica and Dakota Valley Bank redevelopment sites. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 97- ,"RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF MNDOT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 76203 FOR GRADING, SURFACING, AND STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION ON THE T.H. 110 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD." CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 97- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF MNDOT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 76203 FOR GRADING, SURFACING, AND STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION ON THE T.H. 110 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD WHEREAS, the City is about to perform grading, surfacing and storm sewer construction and other associated construction upon, along and adjacent to the Trunk Highway No. 110 South Frontage Road from Engineer Station 0+00 (Lexington Avenue) to Engineer Station 14+20 (1,420 feet east of Lexington Avenue) within the corporate City limits in accordance with City-prepared plans, specifications, and/or special provisions designated by the City as City Project No. 9610 and by the State as State Project No. 1918-98 (T.H. 110=117); and WHEREAS, the City has requested participation by the State in the costs of the grading, surfacing and storm sewer construction; and WHEREAS, the State is willing to participate in the costs of the grading, surfacing and storm sewer construction and associated construction engineering in an amount equal to $25,000 as hereinafter set forth; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Mendota Heights enter into Mn/DOT Agreement No. 76203 with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: The State is willing to participate with a lump sum payment of $25,000 for grading, surfacing and storm sewer construction by the City on T.H. 110 South Frontage Road BE IT FITRTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute such Agreement. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 15th day of July, 1997. CITY COUNCIL ' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � BY Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk � MnjDQT Pre—Letting Svc TE�:612-296-1805 ; POst-it°' F�x Nota 7871 Data � • ! To �, � Q From � CoJDopl, �a. � ; Phonc d�S�! g.� Phone R 1 DESIGN SERVZCES SECTIQN k F9Y � � Ju1 15 9 N01�t' A � STATE OF MINNESaTA � DEPARTMENT QF TRAN5Pt}RTATION CObPER.ATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT , I The State af�Minneeota Department of Transportatian, and The Ci�y ef Me,�.ota �;�g� Re: S�ate lump �um payment for grading, sur£acing and atorm sew�r con�tiructian by �Che City on T.H. 110 south £ron�age road Mn/DOT Accaunting, Tnformation: 11:55 �0.002 P.Ol MnjDOT AGREEMENT N�. � S.P. 1918�-9$ tT.H. 11Q-127) State Funds ' AMOUNT ENCUMBEREI) �• •� AMOUNT RECEIVABLE Y�ndwNuiObtr, ' YkaalYar: wgeney: �'?9 YUnd: Of�15ub: Appr. AmuunC Cpn[ract: NumbedAatc/�iitry Initiats � Order: NumbcriDxtclSlgnntu rc.s /Indivtrltrat sl�rring cer!%fies 1hatJ'ut�d.c have bcerr encumbend ns requl�ed Ly Mlnn. StuL § 76A.]S.f i3ud ct O�ce; g {At�thori•r,ad Signutt2rc} I THIS AGREEMENT is mad.e and entezed into by and between the SL•ate of Ma.nnesota, Deparfiment af Transportation, hereina£ter referr�d ta as the ��S�.a�e'" 'and the C�.ty af Mendota Heights, Minnesota, acting by and through a.ts City Council, hereinaf�er referred to as the "City��. � MniDOT Pre-Lettin�g S�c TEL.b12-296-1805 Jul 15 9? 11:55 No.002 P.02 , � � • 76243 WHEREAS Che Ci�y is about to perform grading, suriacing and storm , sewer construc�ion and other asaociated conetruc�ian upon, along"and adjacent to �he Trunk Highway Na. 110 gouth frontage raad from Engineer StaCion 0+00 (Lexing�on Avenue) to Engineer Sta�ion 1�+20 t1,420 faeti ea�t of Lexingtan Avenu�? within the carporaL-e City i�mit-� in accordance wi�h City-prepared plans, specifications and/or special provisions designated by the Citiy ae City Project No. 9610 and by the S�a�e as;State Project No. 1918-98 (T.H. 11d=117); and � � WHEREAS the Ci�.y has requeeted �articipation by �he State a.n the '�cos�s of the'grading, suzfacing and s�orm sewer con�truc�ion; and WHEi2EAS the statie is willing to par�icipate,in the cos�s of the grading, surfacing and atarm aewer construction and as�ociated < constructian'engineering in an amount equal to $25,000.40 aa hereinafter ee� �orth; and ! wHEREAS Minneaota Statutee Section 161.20, subdivision 2{1996} authorizes the Commissioner c��Transportation tio make arrangementa with and caopexate w�th any gavernment;al authority far the purposes of conatructing, maintaining and a.mprovzng the trunk highway system. xT Z3, THEREFORE, MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWSc S��ICLE � - ��NSTRU�,�'ION BY T��, CITY $$c�-ion Contra,�,t Award t�n�l Ca�,��ruction � 'rhe City did receive bids and sha11 award a cons�ructian contract to the lawest responsible in accardance with State-approv�d City plans, specificaCione andior special pravieions designated by the Ci�.y a� City Project No. 96I0 and by Che State as State Project No, 1918-98 t'�.H. 110C1�.7} . Executior� of thie Agreement sha�.l constitute cancurrence by the State in tha� award. The can�.rac� construction sha1.1 be performed in accordance with State-approved City plans, speeificatians and/or special proviaions which are on file in the office o£ �he Ci�y's Erigineer, and are made a part hereof by reference with the same force and effect as though tully set forth herein. 2 . [l•Z1�.L ,�ect�.o� �, ,�1ire�,�,�o�S3�E?arvision and In.�geGGiar� of �onstruction The contrac� canstruction �hall be uncler the dirac�ion af the City and under the �upervigion af a registered prafesaional engineer; however; the contract cons�ruction ghall be apen to inspec�ian by �he State's Me�rapolitan Divieic,n Engineex at Roseville or his autharized representatives, The City shall give the S�.a�� Aid Agreemen�.s Engineer �ive days notice o� its intient:ion �a s�arC the cantxact construc�ion. Responaibility for the control of materia7.s for the cantxact construction aha11 be an �he City and its cantractor and shall be carried au� in accordance with Specificai:ians No, 1601 through and including No. 1649 as eeti forth in the Sta�.e'g current °Standard Specificatians for Canatruc�ion". , ,�,g,�j,ozY � Co,,mpl��.ion ,g,�,,, _nn .r»r�t-� nn The City ahal`Z cause the contract constructic,ri �o be started and eompleted in accordance with the time schedule in the cons�ruction contrac'� special pravisions. The completian date far the contxact con,struc�ion may be extiended, by an exchang� o� letters between the apprapriate City official and the State Division Engineer�s au�horiaed representa�ive, for unavoidable delays encountered in the per�armance thereaf. ��ation D. Pl�,�anges��tc, All changes in the plans, specifications andjor epecial provisions �or the contract canstruction and all addenda, change arders andjor eupplernental agreemen�s entered inta by the City and its contractior for contract construc�ion muet be appraved zn writing by �he State Division Engineer's authorized representa�ive. • � �ect�or�E, Gom�+l%ance wf Gh •aws. ,Qrdin�n_r,�gs ar�,d ReatYlr►�� one The City shall,;in connection with l.he award and adminiatration of the constructian. con�ract and the perEarmance ot the cantract canstruction, comply and cause its con�rac�or L•o comply with a11 Federal, StaL•.e and Loeal laws, including Minnesota StaCu�es Section 368.101� (1996), and all. appl�.cable ordinances and ; regulations. ; I'1I1�+L1.,1 I I 1 G LG 6 I, llly JVI.� 1 LI_ • V1G'G7V—lOIJJ i a JUl 1J �f 11•,70 IVU.VUL �.tJLF 76203 �ecti�n F. _�,j, t-o�Way, E�sement�a r�nd Permit� The Ci�y shallr without cos� or expense �,o the State, obtain all righ�.s-of-way, easements, construction permiGs and/or any other permits and sanctions �hat may be requir�d in connection wi�h the contract con�truction. Prior to advance payment by the S�a�e, the City shall furniah the State with certified copies of the documents for �hose righ�s-of-way and eaaemente, and cer�ified copies of those eons�ruc�ion permits andior ather perma.ts and sanctions required for the contract cons�ruction. ; The Gity �hall, within 90 days after satie�actory comp�.etion af the City-owned utilities contracti construction,_submit to the Direc�or of the State's Design Serv.ices Section �ive copies of a. permit application, including �'aa built" gketches, for a13 City-ownad uta.li�ies constructed upon and witha.n the �runk highway right-of-way. Application £or perrnite shall be made an S�a�e form "Applicati.ox� For Utility Permit On Trunk Highway Right-of-way" (Form TP2525). RTI�ji� Z - PAYMEjdT BY TH� STATE The State.shall advance to the City, as the State's full and complete ahare Qf the costs af the grading, eurfacing and storm sewer consGruction and aesociated construction engineering to be performed uponr along and adjacent �o the Trunk Hi'ghway No. 110 aauGh frontage zaad from Engi.neer Station 0+00 (Lex�.ngton Avenue) ta Engineer Station 14+20 (1,420 feet eas� of Lexington Avenue) within the corporai:e City limits under State Projec� No. 1918-98 (T.H. 110=117}, a lump sum in the,amoun� of $25,000.40. - The State sha13 advance to the City� the lump sum amount aEter the �oiiaW�.n� conditions have been met: � ; A. Encumbxance by the Sta�e of the State's Lu11 and comple�e lump sum cost share. B. Recea.pt by the State from tihe City of certified documan�aeion foz d a].l of the righ�-af-way and eaeement acquisition required for the 4 e . 76203 con�ract cons�ruction, and �.he approval oE tha� dacumentation by the State's Right-of-way Engin.eer at,.St. Paul. C. Execution and approval af thia Agreement and the State's tranamit�.al aE same to �he City. D. Receipt by the Sta�e oi a writ�en: request from the City far the advancernent ot funds. The reque�t shall incl.ude certificatiion by the City that'the conetructa.an contract has been executed by all nece�sary par�ies. gRT?CLE =II - CO��`RUCTION DOCUMENTS Fv�vrsxEp 8Y THE C=TY The Ci�y shall keep records and accounts that enabls it to pravide the Sta�.e, when xequesC�ed, with'�he fallowing: A. Copi�s o� the Cit� contractar's invoice{e) covering al1 con�ract con�truc�.a.on. �. Copa.es of the en.dorsed and canceled City warrant{s) ar check(s) payi,ng for finai cantract construction, or computer documenta�ion of Lh� warrant(s) issued, certifisd by an appropria�e Ci�y official tihat final con�truction contract payment has been made. C, cop�.es of a11 conetruct�.an contract change orders and/or aupplemental agreements. . D. A certifa.cation form, provided by �he State, signed by the City's Engineer in charge of the contract construction attesting to �he , fo2lawing: ; 1. Satisfactory performance and completion of all con�ract cans�ruction in accordance with S�ate-approved City pl.ane, speci.fications and/ar special provisions. 2. Acceptance and appraval of all ma�.erials furnished tor th� contract construction relative to compliance of i:hose , 5 �� ✓V 1 1 1 � �y � 4• 1 �� V�u 4 1 L�.. • 4� 1 i L../4 1 V V J G � � JIA 1 1J J 1 11 • J 1 1YW • VV�L 1 • VV � . 76203 materials ta the Statet� current '�Standard Specification.s for Construction". . u 1 a 3 F 1 p yr�ezzt by the City ta its contractor far all contract i construction. Co ies certif'ied b tihe i � s ine � ' p , y C�y Eng er, of maLerial samplxng repoxte and o� ma�eria3 tiesting results for the materials furnished for �the con�rac� cc�netructian. I A copy of the�"as built" plan sent ta �he State Aid AgreementB Engir�.eer . I . ARTICL� ZV - {'`„�,'FNFRAL PR(jy�,�,'�ONS �ectig�. Re,��ement o£ aetin,sr,�, The City shall £urnish its contractor with new casi:inge and/or parts for all inplace City-owned facilities cons�r�,cted hereunder when Yepiacements are required, without cast or expense to the Sta�e. ��n �. Main��Il�e bY. �h��Y Upon satisfactoryl'campletian of the �ron�age rQad construction �o be perfarrned within the corporate City limits under the cons�ruc�ian COri��aCt, the City shall provide for the proper maintenance o£ the fron�age road and�all of �he �acilities a parL• thereof, without cost or expense to the S�a�e. Maintenance sha11 include, but not be limi�ed to, snow, ice and debria removal, resurfacing and/or �eal codting �,nd an.y other maintenance act;ivi�ies neces�ary to perpe�uate the roadways in a safe and usable condition. _ ��ecticsn C. Additi4na�,�r nacr� Nea.ther party to this Agreement ahall drain any additional drainage into the storm sewer facilities to be aons�ruc�.ed under the •cons�.ruc�ion contract, �.hat was not included in the drainage �or which �he storm sewer facilities were deeigned, without firc�t ob�aina.ng permission ta do so from the other party. The drainage areas served by the s�.oxm sewer �acilities canstructed under the & I'lll! LU I rl G-LC L L 111� JV1.. I GL • U1L-t7V-lOVJ i f JU1 l� yf 11 • �t3 IVU . UUL I"' . U f �� CpnstruCCion con�.ract are shown in a drainage area map, EXHIBIT ��Drainage Area��, which ie on. fi].e in the of�ice of the State's Division Hydraulics Uni� at Oakdale and ie made a part hereaf by referen.ce with the same �orce and eEfec�. a� though fully set Lorth herein. ,g..�s't� o^ D. • Futur. 8eeponsi i{ � es Upon eatis�actoryicomple�ion of the sou�h �roni:age road canstruction to be performed within the corpc�ratie City limit� under the constructa.on con�.ract, Ghe City shaJ.l thereafter accep�. full and total ra�ponsibility and a23. abligation� and liabilities arising out o� or by reason of �he u�e, operation, maintenance, repair and/or reconstruction o� the frontage road and all af the facilita.es a part thereaf conatruc�ed hereunder, witihout.cogt or expense to the S�ate. �,�c�j on �_—Rele�se and Ca veyan�,��f Raadwr�Ys The S�ate shall, upon sa�is�actory completion of the sauth frontage road cone�.ruction and a11 of the facili�ies a part thereof .onstrueted within the carparate City limirs under the con�truC�i4ri contract, serve upon L•h� City a"Notice of Release" placing that roadway portion undex the juriadiction of the City; and subsequent there�o, after a11 n�cessary and required document� have been prepared and pracessed, �he Sta�e ehall convey �o Che City all right, �itle and intere�t of the State in �hat�roadway portion. Upon receipt af that '�Notice of Relea$e", the Ci�.y shall become the road autharity responeible �or the roadway gortion so re2eased. ,��.��F, �xam nation af A�oke,, R�corsia Etc As provided by Minnesota Stia�ute� Section 168.06, subdivision 4 (1996), �he booke, records, documen�s, and accounting procedures and prac�.a.ces of the State and the City relevant to this Agreement are �subjecti �o examination by tihe S�ate and the City, and either the legislative �udi�or or '�he State auditor aa appropriate. � • $„�ation C3. �laima - All employee� of �the Ci�.y and a11 o�hex pers�ns employed by the Ci.ty � in the performance o� cantract cons�ruction, corYstruction eng.ineering � 7 ' i . � � , ., _ .. � . � � �� ,� . .,.,� ..,� 76203 nd/or maintenance covered under this Agreement shall noi: be considered employees of the State. All claims tihat arise under the Worker's Compensa�ion Act of the State ot Minnesota on behalf of the employeea while so engaged and all. claims made by any third parties aa a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the employeea while so engaged on contract construction, construction engineering and/or maintenance covered under this Agreement shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the Statie. The provisions of,Minnesota Statuties Section 181.59 (1996) and of any applicable law relating to civil rights and discrimination ehall be considered part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein. i ' Bect�on I. Aaree enC AgDrova Before thie Agreement �ha11 become bindir�g and effective, it shall be approved by a City Council resolution and receive approval of State and City officers�',as the law may provide in addition to the ommissioner•of Transportation or hia authorized repxesentative. I ARTICLE V - AUTHQRIZED AO�� The State's Authorized Agent for the�purpose of the administration of this Agreement is,Patrica.a Schrader, Municipal/Utility Agreem�nts Engineer, or her successor. Her current address and phone number are 395 John Ireland Boulevard, Mailstop 682, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155, (612} 296-0969. � ._ The City's Authorized Agent for the purpose of the administration of this Agreement is James Danielson, City Engineer, or his successor. His current address and phone number are 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minneeota 55118, (612) 952-1086. 8 � Mn�DOT Pre-Letting S�c TEL�612-296-1805 S I Jul 15 97 11�59 No.002 P.09 76203 IN TESTIMC7NY WHEREc3F the par�.ies have executed this Agreement by their au�.horized of f i.�cers . F�EP,��',�'ENT t?F �rxartsPag��ox � Recamm�nded for approval: BY i "' Division Engineer i Approved: t B , Y ,�Jg State Design Engineer i Da�e I •' •' .' � �i�: �'�":: Approved a� �o form and execu�ion: By Assis�ant Attorney General ; � M li� � ! — - t .T �-.3�'"� Mayor Date By Ci�y Administra�or Date � � � i � yM �M � :_� St � . . . � a � 1.� bate• CITY OF MENDOTA FIEIGHTS �� MEMO 7uly 15, 1997 x TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Marc S. Mogan, Civil Engineer SUBJECT: MnDOT Cooperative Agreement No. 76092 for Bituminous Walk Construction Along T.H. 149 DISCUSSION: The State has received bids and awarded a contract for improvements at the intersection of TH 110 and TH 149 (Dodd Road) which includes plans to construct a bituminous walk along Dodd Road from Mendakota Drive to Freeway Road. This work is being done through MnDOT Cooperative Agreement No. 76902 which stipulates that the City will pay for the cost of the bituminous walk construction. RECOMMENDATION: In order to expedite construction of this trail, I recommend that Council execute MnDOT Cooperative Agreement No. 76092 authorizing City cost participation to complete bituminous walk construction along T.H. 149. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 97- ,"RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CI7'Y COST PARTICIPATION FOR BITUPIINOUS WALK CONSTRUCTION ALONG T.H. 149 BY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH MNDOT." i i � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 97- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY COST PARTICIPATION FOR BITUA�IINOUS WALK CONSTRUCTION ALONG T.H. 149 BY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH MNDOT WHEREAS, Dodd Road (T.H. 149) in the vicinity of its intersection with T.H. 110 is currently unsafe for pedestrians and bicyclists because there are no trails, either on the road or offthe road; and � WHEREAS, the State is about to perform bituminous overlay and revised signal system construction and other associated construction upon, along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 149 from Engineering Station 18+10.00 (Mendakota Drive) to Engineer Station 45+20.00 (Freeway Road) and upon, along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 110 from Engineer Station 65+00.00 (1,035 feet west of Trunk Highway No. 35E northbound) to Engineer Station 283+80.00 (420 feet west of Trunk Highway No. 494 eastbound) within the corporate City limits in accordance with State plans, specifications and/or special provisions designated as State Projects No. 1917-33 (T.H. 149=1) and No. 1918-96 (T.H. 110=117); and , WHEREAS, at the request of the City, the State included in its contract the bituminous walk construction and other associated construction to be performed along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 149 from Engineer Station 18+10.00 (Mendakota Drive) to Engineer Station 45+20.00 �(Freeway Road) within the corporate City limits under State Project No. 1917-33 (T.H. 149=1); and WHEREAS, the City has expressed its willingness to participate in the costs of the bituminous walk construction and associated construction engineering as hereinafter set forth. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Mendota Heights enter into Mn/DOT Agreement No. 76092 with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: To provide for payment by the City to the State of the costs of the bituminous walk construction and other associated construction to be performed along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 149 from Engineer Station 18+10.00 (Mendakota Drive) to Engineer Station 45+20.00 (Freeway Road) within the corporate City limits under State Project No. 1917-33 (Th. 149=1). � � , ..� �, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute such Agreement. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 15th day of July, 1997. ; CITY COUNCIL � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS , By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk � . , �� , ' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 10, 1997 � � TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Patrick C. Hollister, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Proposed Tree Ordinance � Discussion The Council has requested that proposed ordinance language reflecting the original tree protection moratorium be placed on the Council agenda for their July 15, 1997 meeting. On August 15, 1995, the City Council passed the attached resolution imposing a moratorium on the cleaz-cutting of trees on undeveloped lots subject to review by the City Council. After one extension, the moratorium has now expired. While the tree moratorium was in effect, relatively few applicants needed a tree permit. Those needing a tree permit did not seem to object to the requirement. Recommendation If the Council wishes to adopt the original language of the tree removal moratorium in ordinance form, the Council may wish to order a public hearing for their August 5, 1997 meeting to consider the adoption of the attached Ordinance. Please see the following attached items: 1. The proposed ORDINANCE RESTRICTING TREE REMOVAL 2. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance referring to the above Ordinance 3. The original moratorium RESOLUTION 95-43 adopted on August 15, 1995. Council Action Required Consider the attached proposed Ordinance and discuss ordering a public hearing on the adoption of the proposed Ordinance for the August 5, 1997 meeting of the City Council. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. (Codified as Ordinance No. 704) AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTING TREE REMOVAL The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this ordinance is to protect the health, safety and welfare of the community by preventing the cleaz cutting of significant trees from any undeveloped property in the City of Mendota Heights without prior review and consideration by the City Council. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Sipnificant stand of trees. A significant stand of trees shall be deemed to mean six or more trees that are greater than four inches in diameter as measured eighteen inches above the ground. 2.2 Undeveloped propertv. Undeveloped property shall be deemed to mean any parcel of property large enough to be subdivided into two or more pazcels or property upon which no construction, installation or creation of any structure has occurred. SECTION 3. PERMIT REQUIREMENT Removal of any significant stand of trees on any undeveloped property in the City is prohibited without prior approval and issuance of a pernut by the City Council. No application fee or permit fee shall be levied against individuals who apply to the City Council for a tree removal. SECTION 4. VIOLATIONS Any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined an amount not to exceed $700.00 or shall be imprisoned for a period not to exceed 90 days or both. r SECTION 5. EFFECTIVENESS This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its publication according to law. I Enacted and ordained into an ordinance this 15th day of July, 1997. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk ! CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. _ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 401 The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Ordinance No.401, known and refened to as the "Mendota Heights Zoning Ordinance," is hereby amended in the following respects: The following paragraph is hereby added to section 20 of said ordinance: 20.19 Tree Removal Restrictions The tree removal restrictions as set forth in Ordinance No. of the Citv Code of Ordinance. "An Ordinance Restricting Tree Removal," shall applv to all districts within the Citv. Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its publication according to law. Enacted and ordained into an ordinance this 15th day of July, 1997. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk � �� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 95- 43 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A LIMITED TREE REMOVAL MORATORIUM WHEREAS, in the interest of public health, safety and welfare, the City of Mendota Heights desires to prevent the clear cutting of trees from any undeveloped property in the City of Mendota Heights without prior review and consideration by the City Council. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that a limited tree removal moratorium is hereby declared within the City of Mendota Heights to prohibit the removal of any significant stand of trees, defined as six or more trees that are greater than four inches in diameter as measured eighteen inches above the ground, on any undeveloped property without first obtaining a permit from the City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this moratorium is imposed pending the development and adoption of a tree protection ordinance for the City. This moratorium is effective on the date this Resolution is adopted and shall continue in force and effect until March 1, 1996, or until a tree preservation ordinance is adopted, whichever �first occurs. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that undeveloped property is defined as any property large enough to be subdivided into two (2j or more parcels, or property upon which no construction, installation or creation of any structure has occurred. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED there will be no application fee or permit fee levied against those who apply to the City Council for a tree removal permit during the duration of this tree removal moratorium. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 15th day of August, 1995. C1TY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By �� -� �.�,.�-� Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: �Ftl.��-'c".�.._ i�,i; �.,r�u Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 10, 1997 ! TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Patrick C. Hollister, Administrative Assistant ' SUBJECT: Invitation to the Planning Commission's Cellular/PCS Workshop on Tuesday, July 22, 1997. Discussion The Planning Commission has scheduled a Workshop on the draft Cellular/PCS Ordinance for Tuesday, July 22, 1997 and has invited the City Council to attend. Background ' At the Joint City CounciUPlanning Commission Cellular-PCS Workshop on April 19, 1997 the Council directed Staff to present the draft Ordinance to the Planning Commission for review before proceeding to the Council. At the May 27, 1997 meeting of the Planning Commission, the Commission discussed the draft Cellular/PCS Ordinance and made comments for revision. The City Council then reviewed the draft Cellular Ordinance at their regular meeting on June 3, 1997. At the same meeting the City Council instructed Staff to solicit input from the PCS/Cellular indushy for the June 24, 1997 meeting of the Planning Commission. At the Planning Commission's regular meeting on June 24, 1997 the Commission held an informal discussion of the draft ordinance with three representatives of the industry. After the discussion, the Planning Commission decided to change the date of their next meeting from July 22, 1997 to July 29, 1997 and to hold a Workshop on July 22, 1997 to revise the draft Cellulaz/PCS Ordinance in light of the written responses received from the Cellular/PCS industry to date. The Planning Commission feels that another Joint Workshop with the Council would be the best way to resolve some of these difficult issues, and thus hopes that the City Council will attend the Workshop as well. The Planning Commission then envisions a formal Public Hearing on the draft ordinance for the August 26, 1997 meeting of the Planning Commission and adoption of the new ordinance at the September 2, 1997 meeting of the City Council. r A 't Action Required If the Council wishes to accept the Planning Commission's invitation to the Workshop on July 22, 1997, the Council should adjourn their meeting on July 15, 1997 to the evening of July 22, 1997. t + CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 29,1997 The regulaz meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, July 29, 1997, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 110I Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to order at 7:40 PM. The following Commissioners were present: Dwyer, Friel, Koll, Lorberbaum, Duggan, and Betlej. Commissioner Tilsen was excused from the meeting. Also present were Theresa Greenfield of MFRA, Public Works Director Jim Danielson and Administrative Assistant Patrick C. Hollister. Senior Secretary Kimberlee Blaeser was excused due to illness. Mr. Hollister took the Minutes for the meeting. APPROVAL �OF JUNE 24,1997 MINUTES Commissioner Duggan moved to approve the June 24, 1997 Minutes with corrections. Commissioner Lorberbaum seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 (Commissioner Koll abstained.) Commissioner Duggan suggested that the draft Cellular/PCS Antennae Ordinance be amended to account for possible future changes in "stealth" technology and possible future MnDOT permission to place antennae within highway right-of-way. Commissioner Friel observed that the Planning Commission faced five variance requests that evening, and said that State law and the City's own Zoning Ordinance set strict criteria for the granting of variances. Mr. Friel elaborated that variances should only be granted if, without the variance, the property in question cannot be put to any reasonable use do to a hardship unique to the property, the hardship was not created by the landowner, and the granting of the variance would not negatively impact the surrounding area. Commissioner Friel asked Ms. Greenfield how each variance request that evening met these criteria. Ms. Greenfield responded that McCombs Frank Roos Associates' reports for the City of Mendota Heights to date may have not been strict enough in regards to hardship delineation, and that MFR.A would be more strict about this issue in future reports. � CASE NO. 97-19 NORTHLAND DRIVE PARTNERSHIP SIGN VARIANCE David Gravelle, on behalf of Northland Drive Partnership, presented a request for a 40- foot Setback Variance for a new multi-tenant 66 ft2 sign for 2506-2526 Northland Drive. Commissioner Duggan asked, for total sign square footage calculation purposes, if both sides of the sign should be included, or if only one side of the sign counted. Commissioner Friel said that he thought only one side of the sign counted. Commissioner Duggan said that the applicant had received all the signatures of consent from the appropriate neighbors. Commissioner Betlej said that the City has already set a precedent by granting Variances for similar signs in the industrial park. Commissioner Friel said that his impression was that in the B and I districts only one side of the sign counted. Commissioner Koll said that she had driven by the site and that imposing a 40' setback on the sign would render it almost useless. Commissioner Duggan moved to grant the 40' sign setback Variance and the Variance for the size of the sign if necessary. Commissioner Friel seconded the motion, but added that the applicant did not need a variance for the size of the sign. Ms. Greenfield said that the curb and slope of the property constituted a hardship to justify the Variance. AYES: 5 NAYS: 1(Friel) CASE NO. 97-20: KELLER RESIDENTIAL INC., VARIANCE Mr. Neil Melton of 2459 Winthrop Court presented his application for a 10' front yard setback Variarice for a fence. Mr. Melton told the Planning Commission that he needed the fence to separate neighborhood children and his dog. Mr. Melton added that he currently has an electronic "invisible fence" for the dog, but that the dog often gets caught in the electric zone and gets shocked. Mr. Melton also said that granting the Variance would allow the fence to be closer to the berm which would be more aesthetically pleasing than if the fence conformed to the setback. � 2 Commissioner Lorberbaum agreed that the fence would look better aesthetically with the Variance. Mr. Melton said that with a corner lot the variance would be 20'. Mr. Melton added that the fence would be 6' high at the highest point in the center, and would have more of a picket fence appearance than a wall appearance. Commissioner Dwyer asked Mr. Melton if he had received all of the signatures from the appropriate neighbors. Mr. Melton responded that he had. Commissioner Dwyer said that although there may be no hardship in this case, the fence would look better with the Variance than without the Variance, and thus the Variance should be granted. Commissioner Friel said that the Planning Commission has repeatedly asked the Council to amend the Variance criteria to a11ow Variances without a hardsl�ip if all relevant neighbors consent, but to no avail. Commissioner Duggan said that on the Signatures of Consent form both spouses should be on separate lines in order to give each spouse an opportuniiy to sign or not to sign. Commissioner Betlej said that there were no existing 6' fences in the vicinity of the applicant's property. Mr. Melton said that the fence would only be 6' at the post and that along the majority of its length the fence would be 5.25 feet high. � Commissioner Betlej asked if the ordinance should allow 6' fences. Commissioner Duggan said that if the fence were any shorter the dog would get over it eventually. Commissioner Lorberbaum moved to recommend approval of the 10' front yard setback Variance for the fence as proposed. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. AYES: ' 4 NAYS: 2 (Friel, Betlej) I CASE NO. 97-25: ROYAL REDEEMER LUTHERAN CHURCH Mary Moore, administrative secretary for Royal Redeemer Lutheran Church, presented the Church's request for a 20' setback variance and a 20' size variance for a new 32 ft2 sign. Ms. Moore said that the Church has received complaints about the light emanating from the current sign and that the new sign would be a solution to this problem. Ms. Moore continued that the new sign would be closer to the existing driveway than the existing sign. '�, Commissioner Duggan said that the necessary size variance would be 40 sc�uare feet because both sides of the sign should be counted. Commissioner Duggan then described his own church's new sign and what an innovative design it represented, being 8' tall and 1' wide. , Ms. Moore said that Royal Redeemer's proposed new sign would only be one foot taller than CiTy Hall's sign. ; Commissioner Dwyer said that the applicant probably could not claim a legitimate hardship, but that the Variance should be granted as "diminimous". Cominissioner Duggan said that he had examined the signs of all the churches in town and that they all appeared to conform the City's zoning ordinance.' Commissioner Duggan asked where the City should draw the line on sign variances for churches. � Commissioner Dwyer said that once the sign was in place it would obstruct the view of motorists. �� Commissioner Dwyer asked if anyone in the audience was present who wished to comment on tfiis application. I There was no one in the audience who wished comment on this application. Commissioner Dwyer declared the public hearing on this application closec�. Commissioner Koll said that the sign would add more organizational structure, exuding calmness and serenity, and would make the Church site as a whole more of an asset to the community. Commissioner Koll moved to recommend approval of the 20' setback variance and the 40' sign size variance for Royal Redeemer Church. Commissione � Dwyer seconded Commissioner Koll's motion. Commissioner Lorberbaum asked how brightly the sign would be lit. Ms. Moore said that the sign would be as bright as Bethel Baptist's sign, and would not be brighter than City Hall's sign. 4 Commissioner Duggan said that if the sign were set back further, the lighting of the sign would be less of an issue. Commissioner Dwyer said that the sign ordinance said nothing about the brightness of signs. ', Commissioner Lorberbaum wished to amend the motion by requiring that the new sign be no brighter than City Hall's sign. Commissioner Friel asked that the two variance requests be handled through separate motions. Commissioner Koll agreed to make to separate motions, withdrew her previous motion, and moved to approve only the 20' setback variance on the condition that the sign be no brighter than City Hall's sign. , AYES: 6 NAYS: ` 0 Commissioner Koll then moved to approve the 40' sign size variance. AYES: 2 (Dwyer, Koll) NAYS: � 4 CASE NO. 97-26: GUSTAFSON (BIFULK RESIDENCE) - VARIANCE Mr. Bifulk of 1936 Glen Hill Road presented his application for a 20' front-yard setback Variance to place a black chain-link fence through a grove of trees which he recently planted at his residence. Mr. Bifulk continued that he wanted to secure the Culligan part of his yard. Mr. Bifulk said that the fence would include a small gate. Mr. Bifulk said that although the original application proposed that the fence be 6' in height, he now only wanted the fence to be 4' in height except at one point where it would be 5' in height. Commissioner Dwyer clarified that the variance was for the location of the fence, not the height of the fence. � Mr. Bifulk pointed out that his garage was to the front of his lot. Mr. Bifulk then showed photographs of his property and diagrams of the proposed fencing materials to the Planning Commission. Mr. Bifulk said that the black color of the fence would blend in with all the trees and that he had talked to all of his neighbors and they approved of the fence idea. �I Commissioner Koll said that she had ta.lked to two of Mr. Bifulk's neighbors, and that they loved his�yard and approved of the fence idea. 5 Mr. Bifulk said that it would be hard for a casual observer to notice the fence after it was constructed. Commissioner Dwyer asked if anyone was present to comment on this fence. There was no one in the audience to comment on this application. Commissioner Dwyer declared the public hearing on this application closed. Commissioner Lorberbaum moved to approve the 20' front-yard setback variance. Commissioner Koll seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 (Friel abstains) VERBAL REVIEW Commissioner Dwyer noted that the public hearing for the next Planning Application was not scheduled for another fifteen minutes, and thus asked Mr. Danielson for the Verbal Review. Mr. Danielson updated the Commission on last month's Planning Cases. Mr. Danielson also asked how the Commission felt about requiring the signatures of both spouses on the Signatures of Consent form for Variances. Mr. Danielson said that Staff typically put both spouses on the signature list but only required one signature. Commissioner Duggan said that both spouses should be given the opportunity for input. Mr. Danielson explained that the names placed on the signature list were based on County ownership records. Commissioner Dwyer said that getting both signatures would place an additional burden on the applicant, and that this matter should be a Council decision. Commissioner Dwyer then asked Staff about the status of the draft RV parking/storage ordinance. Mr. Hollister responded that Staff had judged the Planning Commission's agenda that evening and the City' Council's agenda on August Sth, 1997 to be quite long, and had thus decided to leave the issue off of both agendas. Mr. Hollister added that Staff would revive the issue of RV pazking/storage at a future meeting when the agenda is somewhat shorter. C CASE NO. 97-18 GIGUERE, CUP AND VARIANCE Commissioner Duggan remarked that although Mr. Giguere had applied for both a Conditional Use Permit and a Variance, he had only paid the fee for the Variance. Commissioner Duggan asked Staff to clarify this situation. Mr. Hollister responded that Staff had indication that there was a difference of interpretation within the Council on whether or not a homeowner replacing an existing detached garage with a new detached garage would require a Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Hollister added that Staff had processed both a Conditional Use Permit and a Variance for Mr. Giguere, but had made the Conditional Use Permit fee due prior to receipt of a building permit unless the Council waived the fee. Mr. Giguere presented his application for a 4' side-yard setback Variance and a Conditional Use Permit to replace his existing detached single-car garage with a new detached two-car garage. Mr. Giguere said that his house was built in 1924 on a long narrow lot. Mr. Giguere said that after the garage is built it would be 4' closer to his house. Mr. Giguere said that due to the nature of his property, to place the garage in any other location would pose an undue hardship. Commissioner Dwyer asked if the new garage would be no closer the Mr. Giguere's property line than the old garage. Mr. Giguere confirmed that that was the case. Commissioner Duggan asked if Mr. Giguere had any plans for the space between his new garage and his covered patio. Mr. Giguere said that that area would be used for a gutter system. Commissioner Duggan asked if flooding was a problem on Mr. Giguere's property. Mr. Giguere responded that flooding had not been a significant problem on his property, even this suminer with the heavy rainstorms the area had experienced. Commissioner Lorberbauxn asked if Mr. Giguere had considered removing his patio for the new garage. Mr. Giguere responded that he had briefly considered that option, but realized that removing the patio would double the cost of replacing the garage, would involve the removal of existing footings and the placement of new footings, would create a breezeway that he would have no use for, and would create a significant drainage problem. Mr. Giguere added that he and his wife liked their patio. 7 Commissioner Lorberbaum asked if the new two-car garage would allow Mr. Giguere to eliminate the second shed behind his garage. Mr. Giguere responded that the structure was not a shed, but a playhouse. Commissioner Friel said that in this era, only having a one-car garage was indeed a hardship. Commissioner Koll asked about building materials. Mr. Giguere said that the roof, siding, color, and windows would all match his existing house. Commissioner Koll asked about drainage. Mr. Giguere said that he would not build the garage if drainage was going to be a problem. Mr. Giguere said that the lot drains from the front to the rear. Commissioner Dwyer asked if anyone in the audience would like to address this application. There was no one in the audience to comment on this application. Commissioner Dwyer then declared the public hearing closed on this application. Commissioner Friel moved to recommend that the Council approve the 4' side-yard setback Variance and the Conditional Use Permit for Mr. Giguere's garage replacement. Commissioner Betlej seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Duggan remarked that he hoped the Council would waive the CUP fee for Mr. Giguere. CASE NO. 97-21 VISITATION, WETLANDS PERMIT Gary Ostberg of Ostberg Architects introduced himself as the architect and representative for the Convent of the Visitation School. Mr. Ostberg then introduced Richard Davern, Mary-Ann Ober, and Greg Kopischke of Visitation. Mr. Ostberg presented Visitation's plans to expand parking, create new tennis courts, and build a new gym and early childhood center. Mr. Ostberg said that Visitation only had 8 four tennis courts at this time, which not only were insufficient in number for a tournament, but were also on soft soil. Mr. Ostberg said that Visitation was redoing 29 paxking spaces and that the early childhood center had lost 29 spaces. Mr. Ostberg continued that the Wetlands Permit was necessary for the tennis courts near the pond. Mr. Ostberg said that all drainage came from off the tennis courts to the parking lot. Commissioner Duggan asked about the scale on the bottom of the map. Mr. Ostberg said that the drawings were 50 scale. Commissioner Duggan asked if the 1% grade on the tennis courts was sufficient for drainage. Commissioner Dwyer asked Mr. Danielson if the tennis courts would drain properly. Mr. Danielson said that they would. Commissioner Dwyer said that the City was interested in protecting wetlands. Commissioner Betlej asked if any significant trees were removed during grading. Mr. Ostberg said that groves of evergreens were removed. Commissioner Betlej asked if Visitation planned to replace those trees. Mr. Ostberg said yes, they did. Commissioner Friel asked if any trees were removed from the wetland azea. Mr. Ostberg said that no, they were not. Commissioner Friel asked where the water from the site would go after the improvements were made. Mr. Kopischke responded that the water would eventually drain into Rogers Lake, as it currently does. Commissioner Friel asked Mr. Danielson if the water level in Rogers Lake had been a problem during the wet July this year. Mr. Danielson said that he was not aware of any problem. Mr. Danielson continued that most of the calls of concern to City Hall about flooding had been about smaller ponds. � Commissioner Koll said that Visitation's plans represented a lot of additional hard surface, and that she was concerned about drainage. Commissioner Koll added that she would follow Mr. Danielson's recommendation. Mr. Ostberg said that Visitation had repeated meetings about drainage and was convinced that the situation would be fine. Mr. Kopischke said that Visitation had managed the water as best they could, and that the parking had only increased in size by ten percent. Mr. Kopischke said that although Visitation was going from four tennis courts to eight, representing an increase in hard surface, Visitation would manage the water better through ponding. Commissioner Betlej asked if there would be an increase in water flow off-site after the new tennis courts were added. Mr. Kopischke responded that such was the case, but that ponds could handle they extra flow. Commissioner Betlej said that some homes to the west of Visitation already flooded, and asked if this plan would add to the flooding. Commissioner Betlej added that there had been some water problems west of Visitation this year because of the heavy rains. Mr. Kopischke said that he would work with the City Engineer on the drainage plan. Commissioner Betlej asked Mr. Danielson if there had been any flooding problems this year west of Swan Drive. Mr. Danielson said that he wasn't awaze of any problems. Commissioner Betlej said that Rogers Lake is a huge watershed. Mr. Kopischke said that Visitation would route all drainage away from the pond, and that there would be no hard surface drainage into the pond. Mr. Ostberg and Mr. Kopischke said that some green space would be added because the existing tennis courts would be eliminated to create a softball field. Commissioner Dwyer then asked if anyone in the audience would like to speak about this application. Jeanie D. Kusie of 2371 Kressin Avenue commented that about 50 trees had already been cut down across from Lake Drive and that there had been a lot of digging occurring. Ms. Kusie asked if any access from Lake Court Drive was planned for Visitation. Mr. Ostberg said that none was planned. 10 Ms. Kusie said that too many cars use Lake Drive and go through the gate in the fencing. Ms. Kusie added that there were too many cars and traffic. Ms. Kusie asked where the drainage from the new additions would go. Mr. Kopischke said that it would drain into a ditch and then eventually into Rogers Lake. Milt Sprengeler of 2370 Kressin Avenue said that Lake Drive had become a speedway, full of cars and trash. Mr. Sprengeler said that he had lived there for about 40 years, and that the students should be easier on the neighborhood. Mark N. Kusie of 2371 Kressin Avenue said that he wanted a stop sign on Lake Drive to slow the students down. Commissioner Dwyer asked Mr. Danielson what the procedure was for having a stop sign erected at a certain location. Mr. Danielson said that the original request needs to be made to the Police Department, and that the Police Department and the Engineering Department would then discuss the request and compare the request to the warrants dictated by the State. Mr. Danielson said that Engineering and Police would then make a recommendation to the City Council. Mr. Danielson said that stop signs were not usually warranted at T intersections. Commissioner Dwyer instructed the audience members to tell the Police Department about their request for a stop sign. Ms. Kusie asked if it would be possible to make Rogers Lake a dead end road or a one- way street. Commissioner Duggan recommend a speed bump at that location. Mr. Danielson said that speed bumps would make the situation even more dangerous, especially for bicyclists, and that they belong in parking lots, not roads. Commissioner Duggan then recommended reducing the speed limit because the area is a school zone. Mr. Danielson said that speed limits are controlled by the State, and that they must be a minimum of 30 mph everywhere except school zones. Commissioner Duggan suggested lowering the speed limit to 25 mph. Mr. Sprengeler said that the current tr�c was a bad situation and that kids on bikes could be killed by motorists. 11 Commissioner Duggan suggested working with the school district and the City Staff to have the speed limit lowered to 25 mph in the area. Ms. Kusie said that if the students did not care about the 30 mph law, they would not care about a 25 mph limit. Commissioner Betlej suggested better enforcement of the current law. Commissioner Friel commented that for many years Visitation had asked to use the City's tennis courts. Commissioner Friel asked if these new courts would end that request. Mr. Kopischke said that after the new courts are built Visitation would not need the CiTy's courts. Commissioner Dwyer then declared the public hearing closed on this application. Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that the Council approve Visitation School's request for a Wetlands Permit for the two additional tennis courts on the condition that Visitation's grading/drainage plan be reviewed and approved by City Engineering Staff. Commissioner Friel seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 CASE NO. 97-22: PIHLSTROM, CUP AND MODIFIED CRITICAL AREA ORDINANCE Mr. Pihlstrom of 1907 Hunter Lane presented his request for permission to erect a yard barn. Mr. Pihlstrom said that he needed a CUP because the yard barn was 220 square feet, which is 76 square feet larger than 144 square feet allowed. Mr. Pihlstrom also said that he needed a Modified Critical Area permit because his property is within the Critical Area. Mr. Pihlstrom continued that his land actually drained to the east to the pond near City Hall, rather than to the west, and that the yard barn would not change the drainage pattern. Mr. Pihlstrom remarked that he needed the permit because he happened to fall within the map of the Critical Area. Mr. Pihlstrom said that the yard barn would be made of treated timbers with lap siding, and would be visually shielded from Hunter Lane. Mr. Pihlstrom added that he was also requesting permission for a fence within the Critical Area at the same time as the yard barn. 12 Commissioner Dwyer showed a letter from one of Mr. Pihlstrom's neighbors enumerating three points of concern about Mr. Pihistrom's proposal, and commented that Mr. Pihlstrom had addressed two of the points. Mr. Pihlstrom said that he had also answered the third point about drainage. Mr. Dwyer said that the letter was then amended. Mr. Pihlstrom said that his neighbor will move his fence back onto his own property. Commissioner Dwyer asked if there was anyone in the audience to comment on this application. There was no one in the audience to comment on the application. Commissioner Dwyer declared the public hearing on this application closed. Commissioner Duggan asked if Mr. Pihlstrom needed a variance for the size of the yard barn. Commissioner Friel said that the size of the yard barn was the reason for the Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Pihlstrom asked if his application costs could be lowered somehow, citing the fact that between the fees and the cost of the abstract, he had already spent $700 for his yazd barn. Commissioner Dwyer said that Mr. Pihlstrom would have to ask the Council to waive or reduce any fees. Commissioner Lorberbaum asked if Hunter Lane was a street or a drivewax. Mr. Danielson responded that it was "half a street." Mr. Danielson clarified that part of the "street" was currently private driveway, but that the long term plan was that it would all become City right-of-way. Commissioner Friel moved to approve a Conditional Use Permit and a Modified Critical Area Permit for Mr. Pihlstrom's application. Commissioner Lorberbaum seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 13 CASE NO. 97-23 MOEN LEUER CONSTRUCTION, INC. REZONING AND SUBDIVISION Mr. Hollister informed the Commission that Moen Leuer had requested that their application be tabled to the August 26, 1997 meeting of the Planning Commission, and that the applicants were not present this evening to discuss this application. Commissioner Dwyer declared a public hearing on this application for the August 26, 1997 meeting of the Planning Commission. CASE NO. 97-24 UNITED PROPERTIES - CUP FOR PUD Mr. Dale Glowa of United Properties presented his plans for office and office-warehouse development south of Northland Drive. Mr. Glowa explained that he had presented the Concept Plan for this development ten months ago, and that he realized that the six- month period for post-concept plan approval had technically expired. Mr. Glowa continued that his Preliminary/Final Development Plan this evening was materially the same as what he had proposed in the Concept Plan ten months ago, and thus requested that the six-month limit be waived for his application. Mr. Glowa explained that ten months ago United Properties had attempted to pre-lease the development, but that they had no takers. Mr. Glowa continued that this time United Properties wanted to spec-build the development first and then lease it out. Mr. Glowa said that United Properties had talked to capital sources and commercial real-estate market experts and was confident that United Properties could lease out this development. Commissioner Friel asked if this plan was the same as the previous plan. Mr. Glowa said that yes it was, and that it complied with the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Glowa added that much of the feedback provided by the City at the Concept Plan stage ten months ago had been incorporated into the new plan. Mr. Glowa said that the project is about $22 million and involves twenTy-five acres of land. Mr. Glowa said that the development involves part of Lot 4, and all of Lots 5, 6, and 7 of Block 6, Mendota Heights Industrial Park. Mr. Glowa said that the project runs from the front of the Northland Insurance headquarters to Highway 55. Mr. Glowa said that the real-estate maxket warrants what United Properties is proposing, and that the entire United Properties Industrial Park had been carefully planned over the last thirty years to feature less intensive uses on the outskirts of the pazk and more intensive uses closer to the center of the park. Mr. Glowa said that this shrewd planning allowed the Industrial Park to stay fully leased, even during the real estate glut of the late 80s and early 90s. 14 Mr. Glowa showed the previous plan from ten months ago, featuring two office buildings of 40,000 ft2 each, and two office-showroom buildings. Mr. Glowa said that the buildings would have been very nice brick and glass. Mr. Glowa said that one of the concerns of the City during the original plan was the "sea of parking" in front of the office buildings. Mr. Glowa said that United Properties' rationale at that time for that design was that they needed visibility from Highway 494, and that being 50' above the freeway meant that the building had to be right against the freeway or it would never be seen. Mr. Glowa also said that another concern on the part of the City about the previous office-showroom component was that the truck docks were too visible. Mr. Glowa said that the City had asked for more screening of the truck docks. Mr. Glowa then showed the new plan. Mr. Glowa explained that the office buildings would now be L-shaped, and that that they would be longer two-story. buildings at 60,000 ft2. Mr. Glowa said that the office buildings had been pushed back from Highway 494 and that there would now be one row of parking between the building and the freeway, but that the buildings would still be visible from 494. Mr. Glowa added that this new arrangement would cut down the "sea of parking" between the office building and the street. Mr. Glowa added that the office buildings featured heavy landscaping and ponding and that United Properties would work with City Engineering Staff on pond engineering. Mr. Glowa added that the original storm water system for the entire business pazk was under-designed. Mr. Glowa then showed a color rendering of the office portion of the development to the Planning Commission. Mr. Glowa said that in terms of signage, UP wanted flexibility for location. Mr. Glowa said that he wanted permission to either locate a sign at each entrance or have one monument sign for the entire project, depending on the needs of his tenants. Mr. Glowa then addressed the office-warehouse component of the new proposal. Mr. Glowa said that these buildings would have a brick base and would be screened from Northland Drive. Mr. Glowa also said that there was a relocated gas line on the site and that it required 11' of green space on either side of it. Mr. Glowa said that United Properties plans to build this project in phases and that it would consist of the same brick and same stone as the previous plan. Commissioner Betlej asked about signage. Mr. Glowa said that each tenant would have its own name sign, and that only if a major tenant occupied an entire building would United Properties consider building monument signage. Commissioner Friel pointed out several concerns raised by Planner McMonigal in her report including green space for NSP, parking, and the 50' easement for NSP. Commissioner Friel also asked if Mr. Glowa should receive a waiver of 3 months or longer for the Concept Plan, and said that there was no point in reviewing the Concept Plan. 15 Mr. Glowa said that he would build Building Four first, and then Building Three. Commissioner Dwyer asked why the office buildings were only two stories. Mr. Glowa said that the office buildings were only two stories due to market conditions. Mr. Glowa said that the Mendota Heights/Eagan market was still an untested market. Mr. Glowa continued that spec-building always involved some risk, but that 60.000 ft2 was an acceptable risk. Mr. Glowa added that the risk associated with 90,000 ft2 of spec- building made some people at United Properties uneasy, and thus it was prudent not to be too ambitious. Commissioner Koll asked what size of trucks would visit the site. Mr. Glowa said that the trucks could range from vans or UPS type trucks all the way to over-the-road rigs, and that even office buildings get visited by semis on occasion. Mr. Glowa said that the Mendota Heights Technology Center would be about 80% office, and that Enterprise Corporate Center currently generates a high amount of truck tr�c. Commissioner Lorberbaum asked what types of tenants would be most likely renting the first two office buildings and latter three buildings. Mr. Glowa said that the first two office buildings would appeal to corporate users who wanted a high-quality image without paying the high rents in cities such as Bloomington. Mr. Glowa said that the three other buildings would more likely be inhabited by "backroom" tenants, such as Sun Country or call centers. Mr. Glowa also said that high- technology incubators might use the space. Commissioner Duggan pointed out what he thought to be mathematical errors on the plans submitted in regards to parking, lot areas, and green space. Commissioner Duggan added, however, that he liked the landscaping plan submitted. Commissioner Duggan also thanked Mr. Glowa for taking the concerns of the City ten months ago into consideration, and suggested that the City should work with Mr. Glowa toward a mutually satisfactory arrangement on signage. Commissioner Duggan wished Mr. Glowa good luck on his development. Commission Friel asked Mr. Glowa if this proposal met the City's 70% impervious surface limit. Mr. Glowa said that it did. Commissioner Friel said that it was not the role of the Planning Commission to verify the accuracy of the calculations on applications, but rather to evaluate the applications on the assumption that all numbers and data submitted were accurate. Commissioner Friel said 16 that it was the role of others, such as the City Planner, the Council, and City Staff to verify the accuracy of such data. Commissioner Dwyer suggested that perhaps the plan was not solid enough to present to the City Council. Mr. Glowa said that his plan was complete and that he would request approval of the PUD by the City Council. Commissioner Dwyer said that the Planner's Report on this application dated July 29, 1997 mentions tra�c as a concern, as well as the width of the entry on one of the buildings (30 feet as opposed to 80 feet). Commissioner Koll said that she wanted more evergreens between Buildings Two and Three, as mentioned in the Planning report. Mr. Glowa said that the report was referring to the end of Executive Drive. Mrs. Greenfield confirmed Commissioner Dwyer's interpretation, and said that it did not refer to evergreens between Buildings Two and Three. Commissioner Dwyer asked Mr. Glowa how he intends to amend his plans in light of Ms. McMonigal's comments. Mr. Glowa said that he would modify the 30' between buildings 2 and 3 and put more trees between buildings 1 and 2 for screening. Commissioner Friel said that the Commission had not been presented with a Final Development Plan, only a Preliminary Development Plan. Commissioner Betlej said that it looked like a Final Development Plan to him. Commissioner Friel said that it was not a Fina1 Development Plan because it did not have all of the changes that Planner McMonigal recommended, and that without the Final Development Plan, the City could not approve the Final Development Plan. Commissioner Lorberbaum suggested that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Final Development Plan on the condition that Mr. Glowa make all of the Planner's changes. Commissioner Lorberbaum suggested that the motion from the Planning Commission enumerate each item that they would like Mr. Glowa to change. Mr. Glowa said that the Commission had the Planner's suggestions listed before it and could make a recommendation tonight based upon them. 17 Commissioner Friel said that the Final Development Plan would need to have the changes recommended by Planner McMonigal. Commissioner Dwyer asked if the Planning Commission should trust the applicant to make the changes for the Council or insist that the changes be made now. Commissioner Friel said that the Commission did not have a Final Development Plan, but did have a Preliminary Development Plan, and that the Commission could approve the Preliminary Development Plan subject to the Final Development Plan complying with those changes suggested by Planner McMonigal. Commissioner Dwyer, seeing no-one left in the audience except Mr. Glowa, waived the public hearing on this application. Commissioner Friel moved to approve the Preliminary Development Plan and recommend that the Final Development Plan be approved by the City Council once all of the Planner's changes had been made. Mr. Glowa said that his submission to the Planning Commission did constitute a Final Development Plan, with the exceptions of the 80' vs. 30' access drive and the trash disposal containers. Commissioner Dwyer seconded Commissioner Friel's motion. Commissioner Lorberbaum asked if Mr. Glowa would ever consider putting a Cellular/PCS tower or antenna on any of his sites. Mr. Glowa said that he would not, and would only satellite permit dishes if screened from view, such as the one on the Northland Insurance building. Commissioner Friel amended his motion by adding that the Planning Commission recommend waiver of the six-month limit for Concept Plans for this application. Commissioner Dwyer seconded the amended motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Friel then declazed that in the case of Variance applications, whoever owns the property in question should sign the Signatures of Consent form, and if the property is listed in both spouses' names, they should both sign. ADJOURN Motion made to adjourn by Dwyer and seconded by Koll. 18 AYES: NAYS: The meeting adjourned at 10:07 p.m. Respec�lly Submitted, Patrick C. Hollister 19