Loading...
1984-10-02CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA �- AGENDA OCTOBER 2, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2 •, A�11 Call . Adop?t on of Agenda. a4-. : Approval of Minutes, July 17, August 7, 1984. A -..t "5.. "Consent Calendar: .r :a. Acknowledgement of the Code Enforcement monthly report for September. b. Acknowledgement of the September 25 Planning Commission minutes. r c. Approval of the List of Claims. d. Approval of the List of Licenses. End of Consent Calendar. 6. Public Comments and Requests , Xo- *'W 7. Public Hearings a. Case 484-19, Culligan -- Application for easement vacation in Valley View Oak an final plat approval for Valley View Oak 2nd Addition. 7:45 P.M. b. Case 484-17, United Proper epi s --Application for Conditional Use Permit for Planned Un t Dev opme (Recommend a proval). 8:00 P.M. L (1r° . 8. Unfinished and NE97 Busin ss a. Case #84-18, Hunter -- Applicationfo Siivision an.4 Pre iminaPlat Approv 1. Recommend a prova �_ c�� e approval) b. Case 484 20�M,irkK � A plp _ icatio� ����Va;laisentatives e. (Recommend pp ) c. Mem on Lot 2, Willow SSpprin Addition. (Repr will be present). 7_7 d. Me on Lawn Spri�nkld§' Sys em for New Fire Station. " e. Zm on 1985 Mendota Pol, e Contract.'. 9. Response to Council Comments and Requests a. Memo o Marie A enue Speed t ...� 7/,,R , 10. Council Comments and Requests 1 11. Adjourn. Page No. 2075 July 17, 1984 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, July 17, 1984 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City .;Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. 3` 'Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Lockwood, Council Members Blesener, Hartmann and Witt. Councilman Mertensotto had notified the Council that he would be late.; AGENDA ADOPTION Councilman Hartmann moved that the agenda be adopted as submitted, along with the inclusion of the items contained in the add-on agenda dated July 17, 1984. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 COMMENDATION Representatives of the Henry Sibley High School Band were present to receive a commendation for outstan- ding performance by the band at several national com- petitive parade events. Mayor Lockwood read aloud for the audience a proposed resolution of commendation. Mayor Lockwood moved the adoption of Resolution No. 84-43, "RESOLUTION COMMENDING THE HENRY SIBLEY HIGH SCHOOL BAND FOR OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE." Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Lockwood moved approval of the consent calendar as submitted and recommended for approval as part of the meeting agenda, with the exception of item e., claims list approval, along with authorization for execution of all necessary documents contained there- in. here- in. a. Acknowledgement of the minutes of the July 11th Planning Commission meeting. b. Acknowledgement of the minutes of the June 6th NDC -4 meeting. c. Acknowledgement of the Fire Department monthly C' Page No. 2076 July 17, 1984 report for June. d. Acknowledgement of the Treasurer's monthly report for June. e. Approval of the list of contractor licenses, granting licenses to: Bowler Company Conway Construction Company, Inc. First Landmark Builders Ray Kreps Construction Company, Inc. Mesna Construction Company Norman Veness Concrete Heating & Air Con- ditioning License General Contractor License General Contractor License General Contractor License General Contractor License Masonry License f. Acknowledgement of a letter from Mn/DOT in re- sponse to the City's request for a speed limit reduction on T.H. 110. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 AIRPORT NOISE Mr. Bernard Friel was present to report on a recent MASAC Operations Committee meeting with Friendly Hills residents at which meeting MASAC agreed to do a short term study of flight pattern's and noise moni- toring in Mendota Heights during the next 2 and 1/2 weeks. "He stated that the information will be available at the July 26th operations committee meeting at which time they will consider changes in procedures to reduce noise over Mendota Heights. HEARING - CASE NO. Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpose of 84-12/84-13, a public hearing on applications from Johnson JOHNSON BROTHERS Brothers Construction for a wetlands permit and con- ditional use permit for filling on Visitation Convent property and a conditional use permit for filling on a portion of the School District property. Councilman Mertensotto arrived at 7:50 o'clock P.M. Mr. Dave Prusak,� Johnson Brothers' project engineer for the I-494/1149 project, stated that his firm proposes to fill property owned by Visitation Convent located alongside of I-494 and just south of Mendota Heights Road. He stated that the project will tie Page No. 2077 July 17, 1984 into the Tousignant property located next to the site and will require 180,000 cubic yards of material. He stated that the area will be grubbed and the topsoil will be stripped. The filling is proposed to commence this year and be completed next year, at which time turf establishment will be begun. He stated that a silt screen will be used to control erosion. Mr. Prusak stated that the wetlands area addressed in the application was originally sewage lagoons for the school and that it is proposed that the lagoons be dredged and filled. With regard to the School District property, Mr. Prusak stated that when Mendota Heights Road is con- structed east of Dodd, the street grade will be about ten feet higher than the grade of'the property next ` to it and that his firm plans to build the area up to match the street grade. He stated that the same filling process, silt screen and turf establishment as is proposed on the Visitation property is proposed for this site. He stated that his firm proposes to complete the School District project this year and seed the property this fall. Councilwoman Witt stated that it seems that on the Convent property there are many more trees than are shown on the drawings. She also asked for the difference in elevations between the road and the property. Mr. Prusak stated that there are boxelder trees and scrub growth which will be grubbed out. Councilman Mertensotto asked whether a drainage study had been completed and also asked where the drainage from the- east will go. He asked whether the City would be responsible for any drainage or erosion .'damages if the filling permit is approved. Public Works Director Danielson responded that there is a developer's agreement which holds the City harmless against erosion damages but that no study had been done. He further stated that the contractor is not proposing to increase the run-off dramatically but that at the time that the property is proposed to be developed a study will be necessary. In response to a question from Mayor Lockwood, Mr. Prusak stated that if the silt screen breeches, the contractor will repair any damages which might occur. Mayor Lockwood also noted that the Planning Commission had recommended that the grade be reduced to 898. In response to questions from Council Members C Page No. 2078 July 17, 1984 Blesener and Hartmann, Mr. Prusak stated that the elevation of the property along Mendota Heights Road varies as much as 10 feet and that the berms proposed to be created on the site are temporary. The convent hopes to use the berms for topsoil to landscape into the convent property along the new access drive when it is completed. Councilman Mertensotto stated that there is no guarantee that the berms will be removed when the land is developed and felt that it is necessary that the City talk to the land owner and that the landowner should take responsibility for drainage controls and other conditions of the develo- pers agreement. He also pointed out several problems which occurred during and after the filling permit which was issued to Johnson Brothers for Mendakota. With regard to the permit application for filling the School District property,.. Mayor Lockwood stated that it appears that as much as 14 feet of fill (depth) would be placed on the site and that it would slope gradually toward the pond. He also read portions of the City Planner's report relating to the filling as it is proposed and as it would relate to residential development of the site in the future. Mayor Lockwood asked for questions and comments from the audience. Mr. James Losleben, 815 Hazel Court, showed transparencies and VCR tapes of the sites which showed existing area land uses, vegetation and freeway construction. He stated that the contractor had designed the proposed project to maximize filling.' He stated that approximately 25% of the pond capacity (School District site) would be lost if the project is approved, and that there is no outlet to the ponds. He also stated that the treeline shown on the plans is erroneous, that there is a great deal of tree growth. He felt that the contractor would strip the land and place 14 feet of fill which would leave the land bare. He felt that one of the reasons the projects are being proposed is to appease the Friendly Hills residents and provide a noise berm, but that he doesn't think that what is proposed is good design for a noise berm. He asked I � has studied what affects the filling will have on the aquifer recharge area. Mr. Losleben stated that the City would gain nothing by the granting of the permits and requested that they be denied by Council. Councilman Mertensotto asked why the City should take any responsibility at this point when drainage Page 2079 July 17, 1984 Mr. Losleben suggested that the topographic information -on the drawings is outdated and that what studies had not been conducted and since the landowners had made no request nor had there been any requests for development of the properties. Councilman Hartmann stated that the proposed filling on the School District property would not benefit the City in any way. Mayor Lockwood suggested that the hearing be left open until the August 7th meeting to allow the landowners who would benefit from the projects to present their positions in the matter. Mr. Chuck Hall, Chairman of the Visitation Convent Board of Directors, suggested that it would be appro— priate to separate the action on the applications since they represent two different pieces of land and different landowners. He stated that Visitation representatives did not sign the application because the procedure used was that Visitation put the onus on the contractor to work with the City to be sure that all City requirements were complied with. He stated that all engineering accomplished for the project was done at the request of Visitation and that the wetlands proposed to be filled is not really a wetlands area. He stated that the proposed filling area is a saddle between two hills and that it was felt that filling would best be accomplished now as long as fill is available, indicating that it could be as much as ten years before any consideration is given to use of the land. He further stated that the project would tie the land into the Tousignant land to the west, that Visitation took exception to the pile of fill left on the Tousignant property and told the contractors not to leave the Visitation property in the same condition but to leave the fill on the lot side so that it could be utilized when the access drive is completed. He indicated that some of the fill will have to remain until the land is developed. He stated that Visitation intends to enter into an agreement with the contractor after approval is given by the City and that it will require proper controls by the developer to_protect the land. Mr. Hall stated that there will be no change in the direction of drainage as the result of the filling. Administrator Frazell indicated that he has spoken to representatives of the School District and they have indicated that they are very much in favor of the filling proposed to be done on the School District property. Mr. Losleben suggested that the topographic information -on the drawings is outdated and that what r Page 2080 July 17, 1984 is represented in the drawings is incorrect. There being no further questions or comments, Councilwoman Witt moved that the hearing on the application for filling and wetlands permit for the Visitation Convent property be closed at 8:38 P.M. Councilwoman Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilman Hartmann moved that the hearing on the application for filling on the School District 197 property be closed. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilwoman Blesener stated that she would be interested in continuing to consider the application for the Visitation property if accurate grades on the adjoining properties and vegetation information were available and if grades were two feet above the street grade rather than the 8-10 feet proposed. Public Works Director Danielson. stated that the contours shown are based on information contained in contour maps the contractor purchased from the City. He stated that he believes the drawings to be correct with the possible exception that there could possibly be much more tree growth (poplars, etc.) existing now than is reflected on the drawings since the City's aerial maps were completed ten years ago. After additional discussion, Councilwoman Blesener moved that the applications for wetlands permit and conditional use permit for filling on the Visitation property be denied. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilman Hartmann moved that the application for conditional use permit for filling on Independent School District 197 property be denied. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 RECESS Mayor Lockwood called for a recess at 8:55 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 9:02 P.M. NORTH END STREETS Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpose of an informational hearing on proposed street improve- ments in the north area of the City. He informed the audience that the meeting is being opened for infor- .1 Page No. 2081 July 17, 1984 ,)30,A mational purposes and in no represents a public hearing on proposed improvements, that the discussion is intended as a convenience for the area resideAL He stated that if what is presented this evening seems reasonable to the residents a formal public hearing process will be conducted at some future time. Public Works Director Danielson informed the Council and audience that over the past few years the streets in the north area have been deterio4ating badly. In 1978 several residents in the area between Simard and Hiawatha complained of storm water problems and a hearing was conducted on the feasibility of street and drainage improvements. The proposed project at that time included a complete storm sewer system and street and curb and gutter improvements for the. entire area but that the costs were prohibitive and the project never materialized. He stated that since that time a street maintenance project has been completed in the Ivy Falls area and that it has worked well. He indicated that a number of calls have been received this past spring about north end street conditions and that as a result staff asked the Council to consider some alternatives which do not represent a total drainage system. He stated that it is now proposed that some corrective work be done on Fremont, Garden Lane' Hiawatha and Chippewa. He stated that because of the experience with the Ivy Falls area project, it was felt that a project which includes street overlaying and corrective work costing approximately $15.50 per assessable foot could be appropriate for the north area streets. He indicated- that many complaints have been received about Chippewa Avenue and that staff feels that it is -time to do some major corrective work on Chippewa. He indicated that the apparent major concern of the property owners is the unusually large width of many of the lots on Chippewa and the fact that it is a collector street. He stated that the reaction of area residents to the proposed project has been generally favorable. There were several comments from members of the audience regarding drainage problems. Mr. Michael Kluznik stated that there are about 178 homes in the north area of the City and suggested that over 1/3 of those homeowners must use Chippewa for access but that many of those homes will not be assessed even though they will derive benefit from the proposed improvements. He stated that he owns 300 feet of frontage on Chippewa and can see no way that his J Page 2082 July 17, 1984 property value would be increased in proportion to the assessment which would be levied. He further stated that he could see no reason why any of the properties on Chippewa should be fully assessed because they are not typical residential lots. Mayor Lockwood pointed out that until the Ivy Falls rproject, the City had never constructed "temporary" \- — street surfaces. He stated that -the when First Avenue was widened and improved a portion of the costs were supported by general obligation taxes because it was regarded as a collector street. He - pointed out that while the same philosophy could be applied to Chippewa, the Council is not considering installing a permanent street surface and he questioned whether the balance *of the community should support the costs (through general obligation) for a temporary street. After considerable discussion and input from area residents, staff was directed to; : research the possibility of attaining M.S.A. status for Chippewa Avenue; contact Mn/DOT regarding maintenance of a culvert at T.H. 13 and Fremont; monitor drainage in the area during storms to determine whether the running water problems can be alleviated if street grades are changed; and complete maintenance projects including street patching and opening of culverts while, during the winter months, preparing a feasibility report and preparation of a proposed assessment roll in preparation for a feasibility/assessment hearing some time during the spring of 1985. RECESS Mayor Lockwood called a recess at 10:20 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 10:30 P.M. CASE NO. CAO 84-02, The Council acknowledged an application for critical JOHNSON area site plan approval from Mitchell Johnson to allow construction of a porch "addition at 1149 Cascade Lane, Lot 2, Block 6, Ivy Falls Addition. Councilman Mertensotto moved waiver of critical area C. hearing and approval of the critical area site plan as presented subject to review of the building plans by the Code Enforcement Officer. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 NORTHLAND DRIVE -- The Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from the EXTENSION City Administrator Frazell regarding the proposed Page 2083 July 17, 1984 development of a parcel of land immediately southwest of Pilot Knob Road and Perron Road along with a report from the City Planner regarding Northland Drive. Mr. Rollin Crawford, representing the property owner Arthur Ingram, stated that Mr. Ingram has entered s' r into a contract to sell the land to Ralph Linvill, ''.. but that the sale is contingent upon Mr. Linvill's obtaining a building permit. He stated that Mr. Linvill has made application for the permit but that he was told a permit could not be issued because of City plans for the extension of Northland Drive which ' would split the land into two parcels neither of which would support the type of building proposed. He stated that if the sale is lost -because the permit cannot be issued, Mr. Ingram will suffer substantial damages. He stated that Mr. Ingram requests that the Council authorize the issuance of the permit, recog- nizing that the planning report addresses the roadway extension. In response to a Council question, Public Works Director Danielson stated that the Pabst family owns the land described as parcels 2 and 3 in the planning report. He also pointed out that those parcels will have no access from T.H. 13. Mayor Lockwood pointed out that only a very limited amount of time has been available to staff to address the owner's concerns: staff met with Mr. Linvill this morning. He stated that as a result, the staff still feels that unless there is time allowed for consideration of alternative solutions, the City must consider Plan A of the planning report (Northland .Drive extended northerly then easterly to connect with Transport Drive) as the best solution. Mr. Crawford stated that when the planning report was prepared, Mr. Dahlgren felt that access should be provided to all of the various properties affected, but that he was unaware that the Pabst family owned all of parcels 2 and 3. He stated that he has talked { to the Pabsts and that they indicated they have no present interest in a roadway being extended through their land. Mayor Lockwood stated that the staff recommendation is to • take no action this evening so that other ® options can be investigated. He also felt that the City should receive written input from the Pabsts so that their concerns are addressed. N Page No. 2084 July 17, 1984 Administrator Frazell stated that the City Planner was informed about the Pabst property ownership and that he believes that Mr. Dahlgren's concerns are still valid. He suggested that staff meet with the Pabst family and prepare a report and recommendation for consideration at the August 7th meeting. After discussion, Councilwoman Blesener moved that 1 consideration for acquisition of Quit Claim Deeds for Brookside Lane right-of-way to be acquired from Francis Stelter, Robert Krueger and Joseph Carroll be the refund of assessments levied for Ivy Falls Creek drainage improvements against the right-of-way area. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 1 Mertensotto FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Marshall Gene Lange and representatives of the The Council directed staff to investigate the matter further and report on August 7th. j, BID AWARD Public Works Director Danielson reviewed a tabulation of bids received for construction of the Evergreen ' Knolls Addition public improvements. Councilman Mertensotto moved the adoption of Resolution No. 84-44, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER AND STREET CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE -� EVERGREEN KNOLL AND ADJACENT AREAS PIMPROVEMENT NO. 83, PROJECT NO. 4)," awarding the bid to Orfei and Sons, Inc., including Alternate B. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 1 Witt Councilman Hartmann moved to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement with Dakota County relative to County participation in the construction of a "T" intersection at Wentworth Avenue and Wachtler Avenue extended. Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Abstain: 1 Witt BROOKSIDE LANE The Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from the City Engineer regarding Brookside Lane street acquisition and recommending that assessments levied �— against the street right-of-way being acquired b3- --rescinded or refunded as part'of the acquisition process. After discussion, Councilwoman Blesener moved that 1 consideration for acquisition of Quit Claim Deeds for Brookside Lane right-of-way to be acquired from Francis Stelter, Robert Krueger and Joseph Carroll be the refund of assessments levied for Ivy Falls Creek drainage improvements against the right-of-way area. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 1 Mertensotto FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Marshall Gene Lange and representatives of the J Page No. 2085 July 17, 1984 Fire Department were present for discussion of the 1984 Fire Department annual report. In response to a question from Councilman Mertensotto regarding use of the rescue truck, Mr. Lange stated that department members are trained to rescue someone in emergency situations and also for rescue of department personnel should the need arise. Assistant Chief John Maczko stated that persorfk can initiate first responder aid to assist paramedics when department personnel arrive at a scene first. He stated that the department is notified through the police department if their assistance is needed, and they - are not automatically dispatched to an accident scene. Fire Marshall Lange stated that the policy is that the department does not respond unless they are requested by a police officer where people are trapped and injured in a vehicle and a rescue squad is needed. Fire Marshall Lange expressed concern over the increasing number of false alarms received by the department and cited statistics contained in the report. It was the consensus of the Council that an ordinance on false alarms which includes stiff penalty provisions should be prepared. Administrator Frazell reported on the status of the Fire Department study committee. AUDIT REPORT Auditor Steve Laible, from Peat, Marwick and Mitchell, reviewed the 1983 Audit Report for the Council, highlighting the change in presentation format, auditor's opinion letter, summary of enterprise funds and the state of the undesignated fund balance. LIST OF CLAIMS Mayor Lockwood pointed out that the Claims List includes an expenditure for air fare for the Adminis- trator's attendance at the annual ICMA conference and expressed his feeling that annual attendance is not necessary. Administrator Frazell stated that he believes annual attendance at the conference is extremely beneficial to his performance and that the quality of the ICMA conferences is excellent. After brief discussion, Councilwoman Witt moved approval of the list of claims dated July 17, 1984 and totalling $$1,371,938.03. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 I N Page No. 2086 July 17, 1984 KINGSLEY ESTATES Mayor Lockwood moved the adoption of Resolution No. 84-45, "RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR KINGSLEY ESTATES (IMPROVEMENT NO. 83, PROJECT NO. 5).11 Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 BUDGET The Council acknowledged and briefly discussed a memo from the City Administrator regarding 1985 budget issues. Councilwoman Witt moved that public hearings be conducted on August 21st for discussion on proposed uses of Federal Revenue Sharing entitlements and on September 4th for intended uses of Revenue Sharing funds. Mayor Lockwood s666rfded the motion Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilman Hartmann moved that the meeting be adjourned. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 12:45 o'clock A.M. ATTEST: Robert G. Lockwood Mayor Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk Page No. 2087 August 7, 1984 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA a. Acknowledgement of the minutes of the July 24th Planning Commission meeting. b. Acknowledgement of the Code Enforcement monthly report for July. c. Acknowledgement of a memo requesting authorization to exchange the existing Code Enforcement vehicle for an excess 1982 Ford LTD police squad car. C d. Acknowledgement of a memo informing Council that the scheduled August 21st Revenue Sharing hearing is not required under Revenue Sharing guidelines and therefore will not be scheduled. e. Acknowledgement of a memo informing Council that the List of Claims includes a $2,100 check to Mr. Albert Hanson in consideration of an easement granted in connection with the Evergreen Knoll Addition improvement project. Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, August 7, 1984 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members .were present: Mayor Lockwood, Council Members Blesener, Hartmann, Mertensotto and Witt. AGENDA ADOPTION Councilman Hartmann moved the adoption of the agenda for the meeting, including items contained in the add-on agenda. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilman Mertensotto moved approval of the minutes of the July 10th meeting. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Lockwood moved approval of the consent calendar as submitted and recommended for approval as part of the meeting agenda, along with authorization for execution of all necessary documents contained therein. a. Acknowledgement of the minutes of the July 24th Planning Commission meeting. b. Acknowledgement of the Code Enforcement monthly report for July. c. Acknowledgement of a memo requesting authorization to exchange the existing Code Enforcement vehicle for an excess 1982 Ford LTD police squad car. C d. Acknowledgement of a memo informing Council that the scheduled August 21st Revenue Sharing hearing is not required under Revenue Sharing guidelines and therefore will not be scheduled. e. Acknowledgement of a memo informing Council that the List of Claims includes a $2,100 check to Mr. Albert Hanson in consideration of an easement granted in connection with the Evergreen Knoll Addition improvement project. / � Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 2088 August 7, 1984 f. Acknowledgement of u memo from the Federal Emergency Management Agency regarding the Flood Hazard Boundary Map. g. Acknowledgement of a memo and letter to the Metropolitan Council regarding airport noise contours. b. Approval of the List of Claims dated August 7, 1984 and totalling $303,572.31. i. Approval of the list of contractor licenses, granting licenses to; Bobo Well Drilling Company Bruhn Excavating Cedar Valley Heating & Air Conditioning Cedar Valley Heating & Air Conditioning D.N.R. Construction Company F and B Construction J and D Builders, Inc. Juueb Excavating Company Kleve Heating and Air Conditioning Marbfort Construction Company, Inc. Peterson Maintenance Corporation Pohloubi and 8000 SBS Mechanical, Inc. Ed 8tafbi Enterprises, Inc. Stevens Excavating Superior Pools, Inc. T.C. Builders, Inc. Taping, Inc. University Roofing and Construction Gamacbe Construction AoodIyu Homes, Inc. Excavating License Excavating lioeuaa Heating & Air 'Couditiooiug License Gas Piping License General Contractor License General Contractor License General Contractor License Excavating License Heating and Air Conditioning License Masonry License General Contractor License Sign Erecting Company Heating & Air Conditioning License Masonry License Excavating License General Contractor License General Contractor License Plastering/Stucco License General Contractor License General Contractor License General Contractor License '. Approval of the issuance of a two day 3,2 on -sale malt license to St. Peter's Church for September 15th and 16th. b. Acknowledgement of a letter from MPZRG regarding canvassing. 1. Acknowledgement of s memo regarding designation of Chippewa Avenue as an M.S.A. street. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Page No. 2089 August 7, 1984 DRAINAGE COMPLAINT Mr. Tom Condon, 2535 Dodd Road, was present to inform the Council that he has been experiencing serious wet basement problems as the result of highway construction work. Mr. Condon stated that the contractor has indicated that his engineer is making some design changes, but that those changes amount to digging a small ravine across his driveway which will really do nothing to resolve the problem. He stated that the cul-de-sac which is proposed (a frontage road alongside of Dodd Road to serve his property and that of his neighbors) will only have one drain to carry water from Mendota Heights Road. He felt that that is inadequate and inappropriate. He stated that he is present to see what can be done to resolve the problems. He indicated that he does not believe the problem is the fault of the construction contractor but rather that it is the Mn/DOT design which created the problem. Councilman Mertensotto stated that in response ,to a call from Mr. Condon he had gone to the Condon home to view the problem. He stated that the house is lower than the grade of T.H. 149 so all of the water coming south and off of the new roadway drains to his property. He further stated that the drain is higher than the rest of the property so the water runs up the driveway and towards the basement. Public Works Director Danielson stated that he has been in contact with the Mn/DOT project engineer and has received large-scale drawings from Mn/DOT and does see some problems in the plans. Councilman Mertensotto suggested that perhaps the new access roadway should be graded lower than the Condon property and the cul-de-sac should be moved further south to correct the drainage problems. As the result of the discussion, the Council directed staff to study the matter and return with a report and recommendation on how the problem can be alleviated and further directed that staff work with Mn/DOT to arrive at a permanent solution. HEARING - CLAPP/ Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpose of a public THOMSSEN IVY HILL hearing on an application for conditional use permit from the Clapp-Thomssen Company, for an amendment to the Ivy Hill Planned Unit Development. Mr. Edward Clapp reviewed the history of the Ivy Hill Planned Ci Unit Development, stating that the original approval was granted for 83 units but that only 80 units have been constructed. He stated that it is now requested that the PUD be amended to provide for four new units, one unit in excess of the original plan. It is proposed that the units be constructed on Lot H and that the units be 1 1/2 story design similar to those along Ivy Hill Drive. Two internal and two external parking spaces will be provided for each unit. He also proposed to dedicate property abutting Butler Avenue as C Page 2090 August 7, 1984 the park contribution. Councilwoman Witt felt that the matter of park contribution should be referred to the Park Commission to determine whether the proposed dedication or a cash contribution is more desireable. In response to a statement from Mr. Clapp that he has no preference on the contribution, Councilman Mertensotto suggested that both the land and cash contribution would be appropriate. He also suggested that perhaps the City should retain some right-of-way for the possibility of future extension of -Butler Avenue. Councilwoman Blesener asked whether the blacktopped walkway from the development to the park will be public and suggested that the Park Commission should review its location. Mayor Lockwood asked for questions and comments from the audience. There being no questions or comments, Councilman Hartmann moved that the hearing be closed at 8:19 P.M. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilwoman Blesener moved approval of the conditional use permit for amendment to the Ivy Hill planned unit development along with preliminary plat approval subject to review by the Park Commission concerning both the park dedication and the walkway and execution of a developers agreement, along with direction to staff to research Butler Avenue information. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 84-13, Mr. George Rossback, of Joseph E. Johnson & Sons Company, was SMOOKLER present to request approval of a wetlands permit to allow construction of a deck on the westerly side of 62 Ivy Falls Court, 82 feet from a wetlands area. It was noted that the Planner's report indicated that the home is located high above the wetlands area and the deck would create no impediment to the drainageway. After discussion, Councilman Mertensotto moved to waive the C public hearing requirement and approve an 18 foot variance from the Wetlands Ordinance to allow construction of a deck at 62 Ivy Falls Court 82 feet from the wetlands area. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 2091 August 7, 1984 VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTER Councilman Hartmann moved that Randy McNamara be appointed to serve as a Volunteer Firefighter. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ORGANIZED DEER HUNT Mr. Craig Cox from the Department of Natural Resources, was C present to request Council approval of an organized deer hunt in the Fort Snelling State Park. Mr. Cox indicated that deer overpopulation in the park has become a serious problem and cited statistics relating to the number of deer per square mile of area in the park as compares to the desireable population, the insufficiency of vegetation to support the population, and the incidence of deer/auto collisions. He stated that given the strong starvation potential and the collision incidence, the only practical solution to the problems is to reduce the herd by conducting a controlled hunt. He stated that the hunt area will only be open to a limited number of hunters who will be issued permits and will receive special training by the DNR prior to the hunt which is proposed to be conducted on November 17th and 18th. After discussion, Councilman Mertensotto moved to waive the requirements of Ordinance No. 914 to permit the Department of Natural Resources to conduct an organized deer hunt within ® designated areas within the City's corporate boundaries on November 17th and 18th, 1984. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 TRANSPORT DRIVE The Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from the City Administrator regarding the possible future extension of Northland/Transport Drive as it relates to the July 17th discussion on the Ralph Linvill building permit request. Administrator Frazell stated that staff and the City Planner had met with Pabst family representatives regarding the matter and that they stated they have no interest in either subdividing their property or selling any portion of it but that they are interested only in holding the property as it is or selling the entire parcel. They also were not willing to commit to any particular future development plans. He stated that the City Planner feels very strongly that the alignment of Transport/Northland Drive should be as was originally planned many years ago. He recommended that the issue be referred to the Planning Commission because of its importance on how the development will occur in the future in the industrial park. Councilwoman Witt stated that she can appreciate the Planner's position but can see no problem in this particular case. She felt that nothing would be resolved by sending the issue to the Planning Commission. Page No. 2082 August 7, 1984 Councilman Mertensotto stated that he would not be in favor of condemnation of property (as discussed in the Administrator's memo) to build the roadway as proposed by the Planner, particularly when the northwest corner and southeast corner of Parcel No. 2 could be reserved for a future road. He stated that if the roadway had some public significance in terms of access to the general public it would be different. He felt that the Council's concern is with notification and the Pabst family has been notified on the matter and has ignored the Council's request for their input and stated that they have no interest. In response to a question from Councilwoman Blesener regarding the need for the Perron Road right-of-way, Public Works Director Danielson stated that he could see some merit in trading the Perron Road right-of-way'for right-of-way on the south of the Ingram (Linvill) property. He stated that utilities are stubbed into Pilot Knob Road and Mendota Heights Road 50 feet into the Pabst property and there is access provided to the property. Mr. Rollin Crawford, representing the property owner, requested that staff be given authority to issue the Linvill building permits. It was the general concensus that the Council is not in favor of expending the funds which would be necessary to acquire right-of-way through the (Ingram) Linvill property in view of the Pabst lack of response to their notification and request for input, and directed that if Mr. Linvill chooses to pursue permits he must do so through the normal process. YORKTON CORPORATION Mr. Larry Lee, of the Yorkton Corporation, was present to inform the --Council of his plans to acquire and develop the Gould property at the intersection of T.H. 110 and Lexington Avenue and to petition for public improvements to serve the site. He stated that the subject property is immediately west of the existing Gould structure. He stated that he is negotiating a purchase agreement with Gould and has a client who would like to lease a 55,000 square foot Conference Center structure proposed to be located on 6 acres on the southwest corner of the site. Mr. Lee requested that a feasibility study on utility extensions be authorized by Council. He also Cindicated that .he would be requesting Industrial Revenue Financing for the project. Councilman Mertensotto stated that he is interested in seeing what is proposed for the remainder of the site so that the Council would know what is going to be proposed as access to the site. He also felt that there should be a staff report on escrow needs before any action is taken. Page No. 2083 August 7, 1984 Public Works Director Danielson stated that staff suggests that a $5,000 escrow be required, and further stated that the feasibility study would include utility extensions and access considerations. Mr. Lee stated that he hopes to sign the purchase agreement for acquisition of the property next week and asked that action be ( taken on the feasibility study authorization so that he can proceed with the purchase agreement negotiations. After discussion, Councilman Mertensotto moved to authorize staff to prepare a feasibility report on public improvements to serve the site subject to the extent of $5,000 in costs, subject to receipt of a $5,000 engineering escrow from the petitioner. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PARK ISSUES Park Commission member Jim Stein was present to discuss park issues, in particular the disposition of Lot 10 of the Curley Addition. Mr. Stein stated that he was present to reiterate the Commission's position that a bike trail should be constructed along one side of the lot and that the balance of the lot should be sold to support the construction costs. He pointed out that it is the Commission's position that the lot should not be maintained as green space, that given the easy access to Roger's Lake Park adequate open space is available and the money which would be needed to maintain the lot would better be spent on other park and trail development needs. FIRE PREVENTION CODE The Council acknowledged and briefly discussed a memo and proposed ordinance prepared by the Fire Marshal relative to fire prevention and the prohibition of barbecues in multiple dwelling complexes. Discussion on the matter was tabled to August 21st. MISCELLANEOUS On the recommendation of the Public Works Superintendent, Councilwoman Blesener moved to authorize acquisition of a Gastech Model GX82 triple range monitor (gas and vapor detection meter) for the Utility Department from Continental Safety for $1,500. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. CAyes: 5 Nays: 0 CRAY RESEARCH On the recommendation of the Public Works Director, Mayor STORM WATER OUTLET Lockwood moved authorization for issuance of a purchase order to Scherff Contracting to place 20 cubic yards of gabions at the Cray Research storm water outlet. Ayes: 5 Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Nays: 0 Page No. 2084 August 7, 1984 WACHTLER AVENUE The Council acknowledged a memo from the Public Works Director regarding the extension of Wachtler Avenue south to serve the Evergreen Knoll Addition informing the Council that in order to shift the roadway westerly to provide a proper setback for the Christofferson home, an easement is required. Public Works Director Danielson stated that the property owner, Lawrence Shaughnessy, has agreed to dedicate the necessary right-of-way if he can retain the building density for the easement area when he develops his property in the future. After brief discussion, Councilman Mertensotto moved the adoption of Resolution No. 84-46, "RESOLUTION REQUESTING METRO- POLITAN COUNCIL REVIEW OF WATER RATES CHARGED BY THE ST. PAUL Councilman Mertensotto moved to direct staff to prepare an BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS TO SUBURBAN CUSTOMERS." easement and to allow the utilization of the 9030 square feet of easement area for density purposes in the future development 'Ayes: of the Shaughnessy property. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilwoman Witt moved the adoption of Ordinance No. 208, "AN KINGSLEY ESTATES Councilman Hartmann moved the adoption of Resolution No. 84-45, ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1403," repealing the existing "RESOLUTION CALLING FOR HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR KINGSLEY ESTATES IMPROVEMENTS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 83, PROJECT NO. 5)," the hearing to be held on September 4, 1984. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Councilwoman Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 0 WATER RATES The Council acknowledged and discussed a memo and proposed resolution from the City Administrator regarding water rate disputes between the St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners and ORDINANCE LICENSING AND REGULATING THE SALE AND CONSUMPTION OF suburban communities. After brief discussion, Councilman Mertensotto moved the adoption of Resolution No. 84-46, "RESOLUTION REQUESTING METRO- POLITAN COUNCIL REVIEW OF WATER RATES CHARGED BY THE ST. PAUL BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS TO SUBURBAN CUSTOMERS." Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. 'Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 LIQUOR ORDINANCE Councilwoman Witt moved the adoption of Ordinance No. 208, "AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1403," repealing the existing municipal liquor provisions. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. CAyes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilwoman Witt moved the adoption of Ordinance No. 209, "AN ORDINANCE LICENSING AND REGULATING THE SALE AND CONSUMPTION OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR," codified as Ordinance No. 1403. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 2085 August 7, 1984 MISCELLANEOUS The Council acknowledged a memo from the Police Chief informing the Council that Schaak Electronics has offered to donate an Apple "Macintosh" computer system to the Police Department. Councilwoman Blesener moved to accept the generous offer from Schaak Electronics on behalf of the Police Department and to express appreciation for the firm's generosity. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ,SPEED LIMIT Councilwoman Blesener expressed concern that the 50 mile per hour speed limit on Lexington Avenue south of T.H. 110 is too great and that when the apartment complex is completed and occupied, travelling on Lexington will be very dangerous. She asked what could be done to reduce the speed limit. In anticipation of the opening and occupation of the Lexington Heights Apartments, Mayor Lockwood moved to request Dakota County to take whatever action is necessary to reduce the speed limit on Lexington Avenue to 30 miles per hour. Councilwoman Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilman Mertensotto moved that the meeting be adjourned. Councilwoman Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:31 o'clock P.M. ATTEST: Robert G. Lockwood Mayor C Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk TOTAL 95 $389,831.25 $5,453.20 779 $16,542,144.49 $117,187.67 1658 510,586,730.54 X78,053.23 NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee and valuation amounts. MEMO • /o �— DATE: 9-26-84 TO: Mayor, City Council and City/Administrator FROM: Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Building Activity Report for September, 1984 CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE - 1984 YEAR TO DATE - 1983 NO. VALUATION FEE COLLECTED NO. VALUATION FEE COLLECTED NO. VALUATION FEE COLLECTED BLDG PERMITS SFD 3 257,213.72 1,941.13 40 4,346,402.77 30,406.72 46 5,155,270.03 35,798.12 APT 0 0 0 3 6,750,000.00 28,749.60 0 0 0 C/I 4 8,775.00 142.13 44 2,658,613.00 16,418.88 25 4,704,178.08 22,n93.66 MISC. 18 123,842.53 1,548.94 117 2,787,128.72 19,283.72 108 727,282.43 Q,367.°5 SUB TOTAL 25 389,831.25 3,632.20 204 16,542,144.49 94,859.17 179 10,586,730.54 67,25x.73 TRD PERMITS Plbg 14 349.00 78 3,974.00 63 1,x62.00 Wtr 16 - 80.00 57 285.00 58 565.00 Swr 8 140.00 48 84n.00 52 985.00 Htg, AC & Gas Pipe21 977.00 101 91954.50 51 1,411.50 284 15,053.50 224 4,423.50 SUB TOTAL 59 12546.00 LICENSING Contractor's Licenses 11 275.00 291 7,275.00 255 6,375.00 TOTAL 95 $389,831.25 $5,453.20 779 $16,542,144.49 $117,187.67 1658 510,586,730.54 X78,053.23 NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee and valuation amounts. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 25, 1984 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Kruse at 8:00 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Kruse, Henning, Stefani, Ridder and Burke. Morson and Frank had notified the Commission that they would be unable to attend the meeting. Also present were Planning Consultant Howard Dahlgren and Public Works Director Jim Danielson. APPROVAL OF Minutes of the August 28, 1984 meeting had been submitted MINUTES previously. Commissioner Burke moved to approve the minutes as submitted. Commissioner Henning seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 HEARING, CASE 84711, Chairperson Kruse called the meeting to order for the purpose UNITED PROPERTIES, of a public hearing on an application by United Properties for CUP FOR PUD a conditional use permit for a three-story planned unit develop- ment to be located east of United's existing planned unit development at the intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Mendota Heights Road. The proposed development involves Lots 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 3, Mendota Heights Industrial Park. Mr. Dale Glowa, from United Properties, made a presentation of the proposal using a colored site plan. He explained that the general theme of this P.U.D. would be consistent with the existing building and the architecture will be the same also. He noted that there will be two one-story structures and one two-story structure, all fully sprinklered, with 807 being office area and 207 service area. Commissioner Ridder asked how this facility will compete with an already overabundance of office space in the Twin City area. Mr. Glowa replied that location and price will make this do well. They are asking $9.00 per square foot rental, compared with the typical rental rate of $10-$16 per square foot. Commissioner Burke asked about the construction staging. Mr. Glowa replied that the two story and one one-story will be completed first and the second one-story building will be done when needed. Chairperson Kruse asked for questions or comments from the audience, and no one responded. Commissioner Ridder moved to close the public hearing at 8:20 P.M. Commissioner Burke seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Planning Commission Minutes, September 25, 1984 Page Two Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Commissioner Stefani moved to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and the conditional use permit for the planneG unit development according to the drawings dated September 11, 1984, subject to procedures for the maintenance of the pond being put into writing and approved by the City. Commissioner Ridder seconded the motion. Chairperson Kruse noted that it was too early for the next public hearing, so he asked Mr. Fred Mike to present his variance request. CASE NO. 84-20, Mr. Fred Mike and his son Fred Mike Jr., 547 Simard, were MIKE, LOT VARIANCE present to answer questions regarding their requested lot variance for Lot 7, Block 2, Guadalupe Heights. Mr. Mike also owns Lots 5, and 6, Block 2, Guadalupe Heights. The Commission members asked who owns Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, which are located adjacent to their lots. Mr. Mike replied that most of the area for those lots is lowland, but there is a home on Lot 2, and that is who they believed owned all the lots, since these people do the maintenance on them. Planner Dahlgren stated that Mr. Mike owns three undersized lots that are connected, and he is trying to sell all of them individually. He had a buyer for one lot now and Planner Dahl felt that Mr. Mike should be allowed to sell all three lots independent because they are in scale with the rest of the neighborhood. However, if the City would want to make him have larger lots, now would be the time to do it by not allowing this variance. Commissioner ,Stefani stated that he was willing to grant this variance, but that he felt there should not be any further variance requests for this lot due to its size. Commissioner Henning moved to recommend approval of granting the lot size variance for Lot 7, Block 2, Guadalupe Heights. Commissioner Stefani seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 84-18, Chairperson Kruse called the meeting to order for the purpose of HUNTER, a public hearing on an application by Dr. Stephen Hunter for a SUBDIVISION subdivision of approximately 4 acres of land owned by his father, Dr. Samuel Hunter, and located at the intersection of Hunter Lane and Orchard Place. Dr. Stephen Hunter made a presentation of his proposed subdivis- ion. He stated that his father will keep Lots 1 and 2, and sell Lot 3 to him. There is no intention to develop Lot 1 at this time. He noted that NSP will remove their poles from Lot 3. i i Planningi4Co�,qJ,ssion^Minutes, September 25, 1984 Page Three He also stated that he has moved the proposed building area on Lot 3 back away from the bluff line, but still desires a variance to the setback. At the August 28th meeting, Dr. Hunter was requested to have his home plans ready for this meeting. He advised that the home he wanted to build is too expensive so he is starting to redesign a new home. Commissioner Henning asked Planner Dahlgren if the width and configuration of the access road was acceptable. Planner Dahlgren stated that this "chimney potlot" design is a better solution to developing these difficult lots than having to build a City street in for one or two lots. Chairperson Kruse asked for questions or comments from the audience. Dr. Dale Koering, 1200 Sibley Memorial Highway, owner of an undeveloped 1.1 acre triangular shaped piece of land north of the Hunter land (Lot 4, Snelling View) stated that after Dodd Construction platted, the possibility of access to the east was cut off. Approving this Hunter plat will cut off more access possibilities. He stated that he still has 100 feet of frontage I for the property along TH 13 in Mendota, but that he is interested in obtaining access from Mendota Heights to the land in Mendota Heights because access from Mendota is very steep. He requested f guaranteed access to his land. Chairperson Kruse asked Planner Dahlgren what rights Dr. Koering had for access from this property. Planner Dahlgren stated that access from Dr. Hunter's property is not feasible because of the terrain. He also stated that the best access to Dr. Koering's land would be across the Lilliberg property. Commissioner Henning asked what the problem is with coming up from TH 13. Dr. Koering stated that it was very steep, thus very expensive. He then stated that he had sold the property to someone (Zimholdz?) foe $85,000, but that the buyer was unable to get Lilliberg's to grant access. Commissioner Ridder suggested that Dr. Koering should reduce the price of his land so that the buyer could spend some more money for access. Mr. Michael Kurtz, 1827 Hunter Lane, who owns the Phillip's and Samuelson property adjacent to Hunter Lane, spoke in favor of the proposed subdivision and in favor of granting a Critical Area Ordinance setback variance. There being no further questions or comments from the audience, Commissioner Henning moved to close the hearing at 9:13 P.M. Commissioner Ridder seconded the motion. Planning Commission Minutes, September 25, 1984 Page Four Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 e� Commissioner Ridder moved to recommend approval of the proposed subdivision. Commissioner Stefani offered a friendly amendment, clarifying that this approval was not to imply approval of the proposed building site as illustrated on the preliminary plat plan, and subject to the construction of a 12 foot wide driveway access. Commissioner Stefani seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 VERBAL REVIEW Public Works Director Danielson gave a verbal review of cases that had been before the City Council. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Commission, Commissioner Stefani moved that the meeting be adjourned. Commissioner Burke seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:25 P.M. 10/02/84 CLAIMS LIST SEPT SVC 01-4210-020-20 15-Engr 60 -Utilities T INFO SYSTEMS SEPT SVC 01-4210-050-50 4,92 AT & 20 -Poli -e 70 -Parks 01-4210-070-70., 13,20 AT & CHECK REGISTER SEPT SVC 30 -Fire 80-PlAnningo- AT & T INFO SYSTEMS SEPT SVC 01-4210-;3,15-30 5,30 40-Code Enf 90 -Animal Control AMOUNT 15-4210.-`0'60-60 VENDOR ITEM. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NOe INV 29*70 29*70 BD WAT=R BILLS GUN SHOP SHELLS 18*49 01-4410-020-20 COMMISSION WTR READINGS 15-4490'060-60 19.44 154,00 24,36 EL MARKETING MOTOR SUPPLY VOTE RECORDERS 01-4300-640-10 154.03 MOTOR SUPPLY SWITCH 2281 01-4330-460-30 59,49 CITY MOTOR SUPPLY 1934500 01-4330-490-70 CONTINENTAL SAFETYEQ GAS MONITO/CABLE 15-4305-060-60 19345o)O COAST TO COAST SCREWDRIVERS/PLIER 01-4300-640-10 475,97 HYDRAULIC SERVICES PUMP REPAIR 15-4330-490-60 475.97- 55.00 LIGHTNING POWDER CO SPLYS 01-4305-020-20 55,30 20.0' PINK:-'RTONS R DUNKER REGR D DELMONT 01-4490-020-20 20,20 8,22 S, 0 E E ) PRINT BUDGET COVERS 01-4300-110-10 8.22 400 STATE AGCY REVOLG FO ADMIN COSTS 01-4490-040-40 4*30 STATE AGCY REVJLG FD ADMIN COVERS 01-4490-050-50 400 STATE AGCY REVOLG FO ADMIN COVERS 01-4490-070-70 4.30 STATE AGCY REVOLG FD ADMIN :OVERS 01-4490-110-10 4,30 STATE AGCY REVOLG FD ADMIN COVERS 05-4490-105-15 4.18 STATE AGCY REVOLG FD ADMIN COVERS 15-4490-060-60 25o68 3,59 AT & T INFO SYSTEMS SEPT SVC 01-4210-020-20 5.30 AT & T INFO SYSTEMS SEPT SVC 01-4210-050-50 4,92 AT & T INFO SYSTEMS SEPT SVC 01-4210-070-70., 13,20 AT & " INFD SYSTEMS SEPT SVC 01-422'0-070-7,0'. 4,50 AT & T INFO SYSTEMS SEPT SVC 01-4210-;3,15-30 5,30 AT & T INFO SYSTEMS SEPT SVC 15-4210.-`0'60-60 33.81 ,95 BD WAT=R COMMISSION AUG 2431 LEX 01-4425-310i`50, 18*49 BD WATEIR COMMISSION WTR READINGS 15-4490'060-60 19.44 24,36 CITY MOTOR SUPPLY S BEAM 01-4330-440-20 3,24 CITY MOTOR SUPPLY SWITCH 2281 01-4330-460-30 59,49 CITY MOTOR SUPPLY PARTS 01-4330-490-70 86.'9 12,74 COAST TO COAST SCREWDRIVERS/PLIER 01-4300-640-10 CHECK RESISTER .MOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 27.62 COAST TO COAST SNIPS 01-4300-640- 5.41 COAST 110 COAST EXT CORD 05-4305-105- 12.20 COAST TO COAST TOOL BX/BATTERIES 15-4305-060-60 57.97 *� 17.65 COPY E©UIP CO SPLYS 01-2150-000-00 { 23.70 COPY r-aUIa CO SPLYS 05-4300-105-15 l 41.35 *, 19601.00 OCR CORP. OCT RENT 01-4200-600-10 905.00 OCR CORP. OCT RENT 01-4200-600-20 1,664*GO OCR CORP. OCT RENT 05-4200-600-15 49170.')0 *� 90.9c DENNIS DELMONT OCT MI 01-4415-021-20 90.00 *� 393.65 FRAZELL KEVIN ICMA CONV EXP 01-4400-110-1 175,+0 F►RAZELL K=VIN OCT MI 01-4415-110 568.65 *� 127.69 ICMA RG 9/28 W/H 01-2071-000-00 61.30 ICMA RC 9/28 CONTR 01-4406-110-10 188.99 *i 144.30 LELS OCT DUES 01-2075-000-00 144.0 */ 59.80 LMCIT HP 'LAN OCT H/H 01-2074-000-00 290.30 LMCIT HP 'LAN OCT PREM 01-4245-020-20 67.74 LMCIT HP 'LAN OCT PREM 01-4245-021-20 67.74 LMCIT HP ALAN OCTPREM 01-4245-050-50 485.28 92.65 M/A ASSOCIATES INC CLNG SPLYS 01-4305-020-20 46.35 M/A ASSOCIATES INC CLNG SPLYS 01-4305-050 _ 23.15 M/A ASSOCIATES INC CLNG SPLYS 01-4305-070- '. 23,15 M/A ASSOCIATES INC CLNG SPLYS 15-4305-060-60 : 185.30 *� s M OU NT VEND0P. CHECK REGISTER ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. 82.75 M&W I NO CANONPROD TONER/MTCN 01-4300-020-20 1 30.50 _ M&W._INC -CA NONP.COQ_______ _,_TONE t1MT,(ZN. 01-4300-030-30 1 17.00 M&W INC. CANONPROD TONER/MTCN 01-4300-040-40 1 6.80 M&W INC CANONPROD TONER/MTCN 01-4300-050-50 1 6.80 M&W INC[ CANDNPROD TONER/MTCN 01-4300-070-70 1 24.95 M&W INC CANONPROD TONER/MTCN 01-4300-080-80 1 281.60 M&W INC CANONPROD TONER/MTCN 01-4300-110-10 1 19.95 M&,NINC_CANONPROD . _._ _ _ TONER/MTCN _01-4300-6.40-10 1 54.60 M&W INC CANONPROD TONER/MTCN 05-4300-105-15 1 4.77 M&W INC CANONPROD TONER/MTCN 10-4300-000-00 1 6.90 M&W INC CANONPROD TONER/MTCN 15-4300-060-60 1 51."5 M&W ING CANONPROD TONER/MTCN 23-4300-000-001 586.70 +� MINN BENEFIT ASSN OCT PREM 01-4245-021-20 557.35 MEDCENTERS JHP OCT W/H 01-2074-000-00 6 817.05 McDC:N nERS -ISP OCT PREM 01- 4245- 020-20 6 377.30 MEOCENTERS HP OCT PREM 01-4245-021-20 6 459.10 MEOCENTERS MP _ OCT PREM 01-4245-050-50 6 252.30 MEDCENTERS HP OCT PREM 01-4245-070-70 6 628.20 MEDCENTLR-- MP OCTPREM 01-4245-110-10 8 405.30 MEDCENTERS QIP OCT PREM 05-4245-105-15 6 1 45.j0 MEDC= NIERS ++P OCT PREM 15-4245-060-60 6 59641.00 *� 21 9742.44 METRO MAST= CONTROL OCT INSTALL 15-4449-060-60 1 21 9742.44 4.44 MIDWESTr WIRE -STEEL SCREWHOOK 01-43,05.-070=TU 7 4.44 *� 0 432.15 MILL=R PRINTING NEWSLETTER PRTG 01-42`68=.65.-0-10 2 197.25 MILLER PRINTING ENVELOPES 01-4300-020-20 2 69.05 MILLER PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS 01-4490-020-20 2 15.55 MILLER PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS 01-4490-040-40 2 14.30 MILLER PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS 01-4490-050-50 2 74.65 MILLER PAINTING BUSINESS CARDS 01-4490-110-_10 2 65.35 MILLER PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS 03-4490-105.15 2 869.30 14.05 MINN BEENEFIT ASSN OCT W/H 01-2074-000-00 13.90 MINN BENEFIT ASSN OCT PREM 01-4245-021-20 5.00 MINN BENEFIT ASSN OCT PREM_ 01-4245-070-70 32.95 *.i AMOUNT VENDOR CHECK REGISTER ITEM DESCRIPTIDN ACCOUNT N0. INV. 311.18 NORTHERN ST POWER CO SEPT SVC 01-4211-300• 1 129.39 NORTHERN ST POWER CO SEPT SVC 01-4211-310-50 129.40 NORTHERN ST POWER CO SEPT SVC 01-4211-310-70 . 75.12 NORTHERN ST POWER CO SEPT SVC 01-4211-315-30 24.32 NORTHERN ST POWER CO SEPTSVC - 01-42'11-320-7Q�' 150.11 NORTMERN ST POWER CO SEPT SVC 01-4211-420-50 30.14 NORTHERN ST POWER CO SEPT SVC 01-4212-310-50 30.13 NORTHERN ST POWER CO SEPTSVC 01-4212-310-70 87.33 NORTHERN ST POWER CO SEPTSVC 01-4212-315-30 40.25 _ NORTHERN ST POWER _CO _ SEPT SVC._ 01-4212-320-70 129.39 NORTHERN ST POWER CO SEPT _ SVC _ 15-4211-310-60 289.67 NORTHERN ST POWER CO SEPTSVC 15-4211-400-60 30.14 NORT-IERIN ST POWER CO SEPT SVC 15-4212-310-60 1 9456.57 *� 238.72 NORTHWESTERN BELL SEPT SVC 01-4210-020-20 70.70 NORTHWESTERN BELL SEPT SVC 01-4210-050-50 139.31 NORTHWESTERN BELL SEEPT SVC 01-4210-070-70 329.65 NORTHWESTERN BELL SEPT SVC 01-4210-110-10 77.62 NORTHWESTERN BELL SEPT SVC 01-4210-315-30 84.57 NORTHWESTE*RN BELL SEPT SVC 05-4210-105-15 347.43 NORTIWEST=RN BELL SEPT SVC 15-4210-060-60 165.70 340,00 505.00 *� 1.274.34 19274.34 62.70 62.00 62.,+0 7,96 62.00 62.00 317.96 35.70 35 .00 1 9732.70 104.20 OAK CREST KENNELS RET/CALLS SEPT OAK CREST KENNELS BOARD PINE BEND PAVING INC~ WEAR MIX SAT,LLITE I NDUST INC RENT THRU 9/15 FH SATELLITE INDUST INC RENT THRU 9/15 MARIE SATELLITE INDUST INC RENT THRU 9/15 VP SATELLITE INDUST INC RENT THRU 9/15 ROG L SATELLITE INDUST INC RENT THRU 9/15 IVY SATELLITE INDUST INC RENTTHRU 9/15WENT SELANOER IUANE C OCT Mi SHAUGHNESSY L Z JR SEPTSVC SHAUGHNESSY L E JR SEPESVC 01-4221-800-9U ,01-4225-800-90 01-4422-050-50 4 01-4200-610-70 4 01-4200-610-70 4 01-4200-610-70 4 01-4200-610-70 4 01-4200-610-70 4 01-4200-610-70 4 01-4 41 5- 200- 70 01-4220-132- 10 03-4220-132-00 AMOUNT 151.75 276, 35 29265.00 * / 19873.67 1 9300.93 511o69 17,26 44,14 163.24 92.00 120,74 211 *54 55,42 4,390.63 *✓ 326.80 285.3G 281 ,20 893.00 jk, 218.37 218* 37 *� 13.95 13.95 *i 75.00 75.30 *� 3.30 41.14 11.00 12.76 2.42 11.44 82.06* CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION SHAUGHNESSY L E JR SEPT SVC SHAUGHNESSY L E JR SEPT SVC ST TREAS PERA _ST TREAS PERA ST TREAS PERA ST TR=AS 'ERA _ ST._ TREAS. OFRA ST TREAS PERA ST TREAS 'ERA ST TREAS PERA ST TREAS PERA ST TREAS PERA ST PAUL DISPATCH ST PAUL DISPATCH ST PAUL DISPATCH ACCOUNT N0, INV. 05-4220-132-15 16-4220-132-00 9114 Y/H 01-2062-000-00 9/14 PERA 01-4406-020-20 9/14 PERA 01-4406-021-20 9114 PERA 01-4406-030-30 9/14PERA. _ _01-4406-040-40 99/14 PERA 01-4406-050-50 9/14 PERA 01-4406-070-70 9/14 PERA 01-4406-110-10 9/14 PERA 05-4406-105-15 9/14 PERA 15-4406-060-60 HRG NOT LINVILLE 21-4240-000-00 9 HRG NOTUNIT PROP 21-4240-000-00 9 HRG NOT UNIT PROP 21-4240-000-00 9 TRAIL DODGE INC MIRRORS 01-4330-440-20 1 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED CAP 01-4490-030-30 0 UNIT—:'D WAY—ST PAUL OCT CONTR 01-2070-00:0=0O'� KNUTH TOM MI THRU 9/26 67-4415-94'I:-00 KNUTH TOME MI THRU 9/26 87-4415-812-00 KNUTH TOM MI THRU 9/26 90-4415-815-00 KNUTH TOM MI THRU 9/26 90-4415-816-00 KNUTH TOM MI THRU 9/26 94-4415-821-00 KNUTH TOM _ MI THRU 9/26 __ _ _, 05-4415-105-15 MANUAL CHECKS: 10597 31,987.87 Allied Blacktop 10598 GEMUNIS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 199162.89 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL FUND +, 104.20 FUND 03 TOTAL WATER REVENUE FUND 2.7.32:68�: FUND 05 TOTAL' ENGR EENTERPRISE 4.70 FUND 10 TOTAL SPECIAL PARK FUND 249630.6-8 FUND 15 TOTAL SEWER UTILITY 276.35_ _ _ _ , _FUND_. 16._. TOTAL _ _. T,ID 179- 7/81-4/82- 2 /82-6 893.00- FUND 21 TOTAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT 51'.05 FUND 23 TOTAL CABLE TV FRANCHISE 479975 . .1-5 TOTAL MANUAL CHECKS: 10597 31,987.87 Allied Blacktop 10598 4,762.02 Commissioner Rev 10599 2,495.55 St Treas SS Fd 10600 4,612.36 Dir Int Rev 10601 50.00 DCB 10602 350.00 DCB 10603 975.15 SCCU 10604 22,023.12 City MH PR Acct 10605:L 500.00 US Post Office 67,756.07 GT 115,631.22 Seal Coat Sit 8/31 & 9/14 FICA 9/14 FIT 9/14 Payroll Deductions 9/14 Net Payroll 9/14 Refill postage meter 4 LIST OF 1984 CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 2, 1984 All Types of Masonry B and R Masonry Kitchens by Krengel, Inc. r Northland Roofing and Gutters .:;,1.. Paul Sterns Company == z`WoD,dsmen Construction, Inc. Masonry License Masonry License General Contractor's License General Contractor's License General Contractor's License General Contractor's License September 10, 1984 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR STREET VACATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN NOTICE is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights will meet at 7:45 o'clock P.M., on Tuesday, October 2, 1984, in the City Hall Council Chambers at 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Lawrence Culligan for the vacation of that part of Lot 17, Block 1, Valley View Oak, Dakota County, Minnesota, according to the record plat thereof, lying northeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at the SE corner of said Lot 17, thence westerly a distance of 160.40 feet, thence northerly 38.52 feet, thence NE from the SW angle point common to Lots 16 and 17 and Outlot A of said Valley View Oak a distance of 22 feet and there terminating. This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 302. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed street vacation will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk Is rs Case No. LF CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQVES v p4te-of Application, -f Fee Paid Applicant Name. ,uv - Last Firs ;;.,Initial Ar Addr6iss: _f�Number&'--Street6 a -State1� zip,, n­e Teleoij� 'Number: Owner Name: Last First Initial Addrdss:-----42 io e/ ., ": '- .- I City- State -Number & Street S tree V -f6cdtlon- of- Property ---in' Question: loezk_ Legal Description: of :Property: ,,4;tii dvs j I , Zip 4r & 4r —7 .,""v •v4" Type.' o N;,Request ezon ng jj:�• --r, 'V. ii,iahce 'Conditional"fis -4ermit ,,CdnditibnalUse Permit for,.P?.U.D.�-";, �,Min or,,'1C6,nditiona1,t,Use Permit ; -;'Subdiv: ision:',Appri)val% p -r 'j. Kly ,.',7.plan Appro- �-Xetlan'ds:,,Permit; -i!-! r•"Ot 70W 0 S s a. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO September 25, 1984 TO: Mayor, City Council and City inistrator FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director �-,.SUBJECTS Case #84-19, Easement Vacation - Valley View Oak Case #83-02, Final Plat - Valley View Oak 2nd Addition a '.INTRODUCTION Mr. Larry Culligan appeared before the Council on May 15, 1984, and received preliminary approval for Phase I of Valley View Oak 2nd Addition. T]T C rTTR R Tnw Mr. Culligan, in further planning for this platting, has discovered that the north lot line of the new lot needs to be moved 22 feet northerly, in order to save 4 or 5 evergreens and 2 large oak trees. Mr. Culligan stated that Mr. Bream is looking at the affected existing lot and has no problems with his proposed lot line adjustment. Mr. Culligan intends to build a new home for himself on the newly platted lot. RECOMMENDATION Staff has no problems with the requested vacation and subject to receipt of the $600 park contribution, recommends Council grant the vacation and approve the final plat. ACTION REQUIRED Conduct a public hearing to consider the street vacation and, based on input from the public and Council, act on the request. (Attached are resolutions approving the vacation and final plat for your review). JED:madlr attachments CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS r ' DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT IN VALLEY VIEW OAK ADDITION WHEREAS, a petition has been duly presented to the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights by Mr. Lawrence Culligan, for the vacation of a five foot wide drainage and utility easement on that part of Lot 17, Block 1, Valley View Oak, Dakota County, Minnesota, according to the record plat thereof, lying northeasterly of the following described line; beginning at the southeast corner of said Lot 17, thence westerly a distance of 160.40 feet, thence northerly 38.52 feet, thence northeasterly from the southwest angle point common to Lots 16 and 17 and Out lot A of said Valley View Oak a distance of 22 feet and there terminating; and WHEREAS, a notice of hearing on said vacation has been duly published and posted more than two weeks before the date scheduleifor the hearing on said vacation, all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said vacation on Tuesday, October 2, 1984, at 7:45 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall of the City of Mendota Heights; and WHEREAS, the City Council then proceeded to hear all persons interested in said vacation and all persons were afforded an opportunity to present their views and objections to the granting of said petition. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the vacation of the drainage easement described above, situated in the City of Mendota Heights, is in the best interests of the public and the City, and is not detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the community. 2. That the above described utility easement be and the same is hereby vacated. 3. That the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and present to the proper Dakota County officials a notice of completion of these vacation proceedings, all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota statutes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 2nd day of October, 1984. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84- RESOLUTTON'APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR VALLEY VIEW OAK 2ND ADDITION ,WM—REAS, a final plat for Valley View Oak 2nd Addition has been submitted -t o";the'City Council; and aWHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said final plat and finds the same to be in order. NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the final plat of Valley View Oak 2nd Addition submitted at this meeting be and the same is hereby approved; 2. That the appropriate City officials be and they are hereby authorized to execute the final plat on behalf of the City of Mendota Heights. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 2nd day of October, 1984. ATTEST: _ Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk 4 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood Mayor Petition to vacate drainage and utility easement of that part of Lot 17, Block 1, Valley View Oak, Dakota County, Minnesota, according to the record plat thereof, lying northeasterly of the following described Zine; beginning at the southeast corner of said Lot 17, thence westerly a distance of 160.40 feet, thence northernly 38.52 feet, thence northeasterly from the southwest angle point common to Lots 16 and 17 and Outlot A of said Valley View Oak a distance of 22 feet and there terminating. September 26, 1984 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights will meet at 8:00 o'clock P.M., on Tuesday, October 2, 1984, in the City Hall Council Chambers at 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minn- esota, to consider an application from United Properties for a Conditional Wo. Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development on Lots 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 3, Mendota Heights Industrial Park. This property is located north of Northland Drive, west of Transport Drive. This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed Conditional Use Permit will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk KMS:madlr CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO; TO: Mayor, City Council and CityAdemik2tor FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director September 27, 1984 SUBJECT: United Properties Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development Case No. 84-17 DISCUSSION• United Properties has made plans to expand their already successfully com- pleted business park planned unit development. Council approved Industrial Revenue funding for their new site at their September 11th meeting. Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request at their September 25th meeting and have recommended approval of the plan. (See attached staff memo and Planning Commission minutes) RECOMMENDATION• Staff and Planning Commission recommend granting a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development subject to procedures for the maintenance of the pond being put into writing and approved by City staff. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct a public hearing and based upon input from the Council and public act upon the request. 0 TO: Pl ar ining Commission CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO September 20, 1984 FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director I and Paul R. Berg I Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: United Properties Conditional Use Permit For Planned Unit Development Case No. 84-17 INTRODUCTION: I At the August Planning Commission meeting Mr. Dale Glowa presented facts and information pertaining to a new Planned Unit Development office service center contiguous to their existing facility on Pilot Knob Road. DISCUSSION; This new project is to be similar in architectural design to the existing facility: Planning Commission at the first meeting was concerned about a water feature to be located on an outlot. Planning Commission was concerned because there wouldn't be a principal structure on the outlot and the pos- sibility exists that the outlot may go tax forfeit. United Properties has addressed the problem by including half of that outlot with each of the one story building lots. I ACTION RtqulKtU: i U_ Conduct a public hearing based upon any pertinent information from PlanninglCommission or the public make a recommendation to City Council. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO August 23, 1984 TO: Planning Commission ,;'.FROM: Paul Berg, Code Enforcement Officer and Jim Danielson, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Case No. 84-17, United Properties Conditional Use Permit for PUD (Mendota Heights Business Center 2nd Addition) INTRODUCTION: United Properties received approval for a Planned Unit Development in the spring of 1983 for the first half of a campus type business center to be located on the block east of Pilot Knob Road and south of Mendota Heights Road. The , project included three phases and was scheduled for completion over the next few years. nTCriICCTnm All three phases of this development were completed in 1983-1984, and United is now preparing the plans to complete -the rest of the project. They have submitted a preliminary plat that includes three more building lots with an Outlot for a water feature. United Properties has sized and located the lots so that each building with its required parking and setback can be accomplished on individual lots. The architecture is being designed to match the existing buildings. Construction is planned to begin this fall. ACTION REQUIRED: Members of United Properties will be in attendance to present Commission members with the details of this new development. Planning Commission, upon reviewing and commenting upon the presentation, should $et a public hearing for the September 25th Planning Commission,meeting. PB/JD:madlr UNITED PROPERTIES September 17, 1984 SEP 19 19�4 WRITER'S DIRECT LINE Mr. Kevin Frazell City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota 'Height's, MN 55120 Dear Kevin: The purpose of this letter is to supply you with the necessary information to grant us preliminary development approval for a planned unit development at the southwest corner of Mendota Heights Road and Transport Drive. Enclosed are the following architectural and engineering plans for the Mendota Heights ® Business Center East: 1. Preliminary Site Plan and Landscape Plan 2. Circulation Plan (automobiles and pedestrians) 3. Typi'cai Buildi-ng-Elevations (one and two story buildings) 4. Proposed Development Schedule 5. Cross Easement Agreement Please mote that the enclosed declaration of easement is a draft of what'we expect to use for the subject development, which is a duplicate of what was used on the existing Mendota Heights Business Center project. Aside from the city ordinance that requires us to obtain a P.U.D. we feel that a P.U.D. is to our best advantage in providing for a consistent development concept for the site. Because the Mendota Business Center East will be a phased project over time incor- porating three separate buildings, a P.U.D. will provide us with the best method of overall development together with financing flexibiliity. There are two variations from code that we propose to incorporate into the P.U.D.: 1. Common lot lines with no setbacks. 2. Nine -foot parking stall widths. Northland Executive Office Center/3500 West 80th Street/Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431/(612) 831-1000 Mr. Kevin Frazell September 17, 1984 Page 2 The preliminary plat shows three lots for which we will submit a cross easement, cross parking and cross access agreement that will run in favor of each lot to each of the other lots. The enclosed drawings further specify the details of the plat. Our approach to the P.U.D. process will be to submit the necessary drawings for Planning Commission and City Council approval by September 25 and October 2 As you are aware, United Properties has owned the land for the Mendota Heights Business Park since the early 1960's and has been waiting for the proper time to develop the land into a quality business and industrial park. Our recently completed initial development in this park has experienced excellent leasing success. It is currently 70% leased to such tenants as Cray Research, US West, Sinclair and Valentine and Abbott Labora- tories. Because of this success, the timing is right for us to develop additional product of similar nature. We appreciate your guidance through the P.U.D. process, and look forward to Planning Commission approval on September 25 and subsequent City Council approval on October 2. Very truly yours, oetManager Dalewa Proje DJG/sks Enclosure cc: Howard Dahlgren Paul Berg Jim Danielson Jack Holleran TO: Kevin Frazell, City Administrator Mendota Heights* RE: United Properties Development Schedule Mendota Heights Business Center East .,DATE: September 18, 1984 September 18 - City Council Meeting Public hearing and approval of preliminary resolution for tax exempt financing. September 25 -.Planning Commission Meeting Public hearing for the preliminary plat. October 2 - City Council Meeting Request preliminary plat approval. October 16 - City Council Meeting Request issuance of building permit. October 23 - Groundbreaking Groundbreaking. We are estimating an'eight month construction period, or a June 1985 completion. Dale J. Glowa Project Manager DJG/sks Case No. eFV-1 7 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application Fee Paid Applicant Name: United Properties Last First Initial 3500 West 80th Street Bloomington Minnesota 55431 Number & Street City State zip ''Telephone Number: 831-1000 -Owner Name: Northland Land Company Last First Initial Address: 3500 West 80th Street Bloomington Minnesota 55431 Number & Street city State Zip Street Location of Property in Question: Legal Description of Property: Lots 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 3, MENDOTA HEIGHTS INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. Type of Request: Rezoning Variance Conditional Use Permit X Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Minor.Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval Plan Approval Wetlands Permit Other 0 AUG.f Ir'^r1 August 20, 1984 Mr. Jim Danielson Public Works Director City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 Dear Jim: We are pleased to continue the development of the Mendota Heights Business Center and request the Planning Commission approval of the enclosed prelim- inary Site Plan to provide for a planned unit development project. The proj- ect to be located at the southwest corner of Mendota Heights Road and Trans- port Drive. We trust that the preliminary Site Plan has sufficient information to describe the development. 'However, should you have any questions, please do not hesi- tate to call. We appreciate your assistance in the P.U.D. process and look forward to the Planning Commission approval on August 28. Sincerely, ROBERT L. BOLAND, INC. 1 Jack Holleran �ociate mjs cc: Boyd Stofer Dale Glowa Dwight Dickinson PLANNING REPORT DATE:. 25 September 1984 CASE NUMBER: 84-17 APPLICANT: United Properties LOCATION: North of Northland Drive, West of Transport Drive ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of Preliminary Plat Approval of Planned Unit Development PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 1. At the.last meeting of the Planning Commission, a representative of United Properties gave a preliminary presentation of the development proposal at which time the public hearing was set for the September meeting of the Commission. You will recall that the proposal consists of a planned development consisting of three structures, each of which would be on a separate lot to be platted with the Preliminary Plat proposed. Structures are to be located directly east of the previously approved and constructed Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development. One of these buildings, you will recall, was visited by the Planning Commission and Council at the time of the 1984 Spring City -Wide Survey Trip. The development to the west has been very successful and therefore, the applicant is proposing a similar development on the property in question. 2. The purpose of applying for a Planned Unit Development along with the Preliminary Plat is that, as in the case of the previous development, some of the lot lines will go through a common parking area. If each building were sited on a separate lot without a Planned Unit Development, a ten foot setback would be required along common property lines for the parking areas. The advantage to having a common property line through the parking area is that frequently more efficient parking and internal circulation of vehicles can be obtained. This is a common practice in larger scale developments that are carefully planned to gain these objectives. 3. The plan that the Planning commission saw a month ago consisted of four lots, one of which was to be occupied by a decorative pond near the northwest corner of the site. We know that at that time, we had some concerns about such a pond on a separate lot being allowed to go tax forfeit, in which case the City would wind up with its maintenance and attendant liability problems. This problem has been corrected by having the pond located on the lot line, with its maintenance being shared by the owners of the three lots that are a part of this development proposal. This is a common and acceptable method of handling the maintenance and liability question. The proposal includes a maintenance agreement between the three lot owners (whoever they may be in the future) to maintain the pond and its accessory development. Some evidence of this procedure should be submitted by the applicant in writing so as to ascertain this arrangement. CASE NUMBER: 84-17 APPLICANT: United Properties Page 2 4. The structures proposed will be similar in quality and nature to the previous development to the east. That development, as you know, was the recipient of an NAIOP design aware this past year. The same architect has designed the buildings proposed in this PUD. The past performance demonstrated by the developer and architectural team suggests that this project will be of equal, or greater quality. The current design., as you will note from examination of the accompanying drawing is less rectilinear and results in a less rigid and more imaginative use of the site. The development proposal conforms to all other development standards. It is interesting to note, too, that the parking ratios as proposed are in conformance with the use of all of the three structures floor space for office accommodation. The marketing of the previous development resulted in approximately 75 percent of the space being used for offices. Because of the desirable strategic location of this development with respect to access to the interchange of Pilot Knob and 1-494, the 'developers -and we expect that this ratio will continue or perhaps go higher. It is our hope and anticipation that when 1-494 is completed to its ultimate junction in South Saint Paul, that the United Properties Business Center (and surrounding properties) will become better recognized in the market for their excellent location and desirability -for development potential. This should increase the potential for future multi -storied structures, including higher density office facilities, hotels, and possibly a good restaurant in the area to serve the growing market. 5. The proposal, then, is for approval of the Preliminary Plat, and approval of the Planned Unit Development. Such approvals, if voted by the Planning commission and council should refer to Planned Unit Development drawings dated 9-17-84. CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 28 August 1984 84-17 United Properties North of Northland Drive, West of Transport Drive Setting of Hearing for Approval of Preliminary Plat andPlanned Unit Development 1. As you know, :the United Properties people recently completed a highly successful Mendota Heights Business Center development directly west of this property (at the northeast corner of Northland Drive and Pilot Knob Drive). The success of this venture has prompted them to construct a similar development immediately to the east on the property proposed for consideration with this application. 2. The development will consist of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of three structures, each on a separate lot as previously done with the property to -the west. The buildings will be similar in nature, and built to be leased to tenants as was the case with the initial development. 3. As was the case in the westerly development, the land is proposed to be divided into separate lots, each lot for a single structure, thus calling for the filing and the holding of a hearing on a Preliminary Plat. The Conditional Use Permit for approval of a PUD is requested inasmuch as some of the property lines go through common driveway and common parking areas. This can be accommodated under the PUD Ordinance, without delineating individual variances requiring a setback for the parking contiguous to the common interior lot lines. 4. There is also proposed in the current design a provision for a retention pond to be located on a parcel labeled "Outlot All at the far northwesterly corner of the site. This pond is to function for drainage purposes as well as being a prominent feature of the landscape design. There may be some question as to who should own Outlot A; options may include: ownership by the City or ownership in common by the owners of the remaining three lots. We do not see this as a particular problem, but a decision should be evolved to the mutual satisfaction of the City and the developers prior to the holding of public hearing at the next meeting of the Planning Commission. 5. It may be of interest to members of the Planning Commission and Council that the previous development to the west was "an award winning project" of the National Association of Industrial and Office Parks organization. Some of you may recall that on the spring tour of the City, the members of CASE NUMBER: 84-17 APPLICANT:* United Proeprties Page 2 the 'Planning Commission and Council visited the site and one of the structures. It would appear that the structures and the site development were well done and well accepted by the tenants who occupy the structures. The same architects who designed the first development are also designing the second. The second design, you will note, features a more informal arrangement of the structures with an innovative layout that avoids the regular 'rectilinear pattern so frequently found in developments of this type. It is noteworthy, alsop that 75 percent of the occupancy is projected for office spacef and it thus not a -typical "office -warehouse" type development. 6. The action requested7 theny is one of the setting of a hearing by the Planning Commission and Council for approval for consideration of a Preliminary Plat and a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development. Ulu, 0 Wes I CASE NUMBER: 84-17 APPLICANT: United Properties I HD OWNS I's - IR, A, OF N -1 E & I 0!�_, W�_Wm ROAD Scale 1-800" ON t tr y N � 1 `. '`r y Yrr,♦,,j f t ' • F �X-g��++yyr..�7Y � A. i�_•y( 14 �R, dry4 1 v • S S . ,4 � �.' �f K'. [.� $•fit. a�4i"'�'1Z;,�is� � i'�y�F� �;i �, � � � ;�' � .,,fir r �.,� k ,F .�S'R •,, ��,. � ����� `--.,.._ �{Wlli le I'•"` � fi � �� R t .FF�tt � 4a i� Yr4 ,. . � �' 6 R s ,t , ' ` .. ' /,yR r •r, S Y +r a l A•,r tit{i {, �., F t�d, , : � �` t i �; '�{ *VOih' . � r. r1•e"�... �..t{ ..fD .�,.�.(�ir! .r•' h t .. :�. �'1_. �t,.{' Y. (' Il Y� €A CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO September 27, 1984 TO: Mayor, City Council and CitY�diitrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director 4 4.SUBJECT: Hunter Subdivision Case No. 84-18 ;DISCUSSION• The Planning Commission conducted the required public hearing to review Dr. Stephen Hunter's request for subdivision at their September 25th meeting. (See Planning Commission minutes and attached staff memo) RECOMMENDATION: Staff and Planning Commission recommend approval of the requested subdivi- sion subject to the applicant's acknowledgement that the preliminary plat plan approval is not construed as approval of the building site location as illus- trated and subject to construction of a 12 foot wide driveway and payment of the $1,200 park dedication fee. ACTION REQUIRED: If.Council concurs,with the staff recommendation,.they should pass a motion approving the preliminary plat, subject to construction of a 12 foot wide driveway and payment of the $1,200 park dedication fee. k Case No. 9x -/-/.0V CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, -MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date- of Application Fee Paid 06 Applicant Name: Hunter, Stephen G. Last First Initial !.'Address: 973 Lincoln Avenue, St. Paul MN 55105 k, Number & Street City State zip ) -��.',XeIephone Number: 698-3828(of f ice) 292-8844 (home .,Nante: T-TiinlA-e- RnrniiAl W- k Thp- 1 mn F. Last First Initial Address: 1175 Orchard Place, Mendota Heights MN 55118* Number & Street City State zip Street Location of Property in Question: 2 Northwest corner of Orchard Place and Hunter Lane - Legal Description of Property.- See Attached Sheet - Type of Request: Rezoning Variance Conditional' Use" 'Permit' Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Minor.Conditional Use Permit 0 x —4 -Subdivision Approval Plan Approval Vletlirids Permit . j Other DESCRIPTION .ots 5 and 38; and The East 40.3 feet of Lots 4 and 37; and the South 30 feet of Lot 39 and the South 0 feet of the W' of Lot 40,Grand View Heights Dakota County; and Lot 11 of Auditor's Subdivision No. , Mendota; and Part of Government Lot 2,' Section 27, Township 28, Range 23, described as follows: ceginning where the northerly line of said Government Lot 2 intersects the southeasterly line of *-eaudet's Addition to the Town of Mendota,; thence Southeasterly 260 feet to a point 184.5 feet South .nd 1500 feet west of the northeast corner of said Section 27; thence easterly 130 feet to a point .84.5 feet south and 1370 feet west of the Northeast corner of.said Section 27; thence south 30 feet Parallel to the east line of said Section 27; thence easterly 50 feet along the southerly line of )rchard Road as now used and traveled to the easterly line of said Government Lot 2; thence 214.5 .eet north along said easterly line to the northerly line of Government Lot 2; thence westerly 356 .eet along the northerly line of said Government Lot 2 to place of beginning; and The North 214.5 feet of the NEk of the NE'k except the East 1175 feet of Section 27; Township 28, Range 23; and Lots 34,35 36, 37, 38 and 39 and the Southwesterly k of vacated K Street adjacent thereto, and all of vacated T Street, Beaudet's Addition to the Town of Mendota, except the northwesterly 135 feet thereof. ?wner: Samuel W. & Thelma E. Hunter Plattor: Stephen G. Hunter, D.D.S4 1175 Orchard Place 973 Lincoln Avenue Mendota Heights, MN 55118 St. Paul, MN 55105 Work: 698-3828 Home: 292-8844 Surveyor: Paul McGinley, R.L. S. Paul R. McLagan & Son 233 Dakota Avenue West St. Paul, MN 55118 457-3645 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO September 20, 1984 TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director and Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat for Hunter Bluff Case No. 84-18 INTRODUCTION: Dr. Steven Hunter was before the Planning Commission at the last meeting and explained the details of his proposed subdivision. DISCUSSION: ® At that meeting there was concern expressed about the proposed close proximity of a home to the Critical Area bluff line. Planning Commission requested that Dr. Hunter have his plans available for the September public hearing so the Critical Area Ordinance Review could be considered at the same time as the preliminary plat. Dr. Hunter has not submitted the requested home plans in time for a staff review. There was also con- cern expressed about the width of the frontage of Lot 3 along Orchard Place. Planning Commission indicated they would like to have a 60 foot,,, width. Dr. Hunter has resubmitted the plans increasing the width to 30' feet and showing the new home setback so that a 60 foot width could be accomplished. ACTION REQUIRED. Conduct the required public hearing and based upon input from Planning Commission members and public make a recommendation to City Council. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MW August 23, 1984 TO: Planning Commission I FROM: Paul Berg, Code Enforcement Officer and Jim Danielson, Public Works Director :SUBJECT: Case No. 84-18, Hunter Subdivision (Orchard Hill Preliminary Plat and Critical Area Review) INTRODUCTION: Samuel Hunter, 1175 Orchard Place, owns approximately four acres of land along the bluff line at the intersection of Orchard and Hunter Lane, and proposes to subdivide his land into three lots so that his son may build a home on one of the new lots adjacent to the bluff line. Mr.rl I qc.TnN - Upon review of the preliminary plat, staff found two items of concern: 1. The proposed home for Steven Hunter is located on the bluff line. The CAD ordinance requires a 40 foot setback from the bluff line. Staff made an on-site visit and met with the owner. There is a nice, level, buildable plateau at the bluff line, adjacent to an existing summer house. Mr. Hunters' architect would like to design the house to be built along the bluff line incorporating the summer house in the design. 2. Sewer service to the new home. Because of the elevation of Lot 3, where the new home is proposed, , a sewage ejector would be required to pump the sewage into the City's main on Orchard Place. The applicant has, therefore, requested the City to consider a variance to the requirement prohibiting an on-site sewage system. ACTION REQUIRED: Members of the Hunter family will be in attendance at the Planning Commission meeting to present details of this preliminary plat and CAO review. Planning Commission, upon review and commenting upon presentation, should set a public hearing for the September 25, 1984 Planning Commission meeting. PB/JD:madlr 1.. 3f J PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 25 September 1984 84-18 Stephen Hunter Northwest Corner of Orchard Place and Hunter Lane Approval of Preliminary Plat 1. The property in question consists of approximately 4.0 acres, has approximately 195 feet of frontage on the north side of Orchard Place and is occupied by a residence, a shed, and a summer house located on and slightly across the bluff line, near the northwesterly side of the property. The property is zoned R-1, requiring 15,000 square feet of land per lot and 100 feet of frontage on a public street. The proposal is to divide the 4.0 acre -tract into°"thrd* large lots as indicated on the attached copy of the preliminary plat proposed. The westerly -most lot (containing the existing residence) would have 90 feet of frontage on Orchard Place. The northerly- most lot would have 30 feet of frontage, and the easterly -most lot would have 75 feet of -frontage. Access to all three lots would be via a 30 foot corridor which would have a common easement. This corridor, as you will note from the plans provides" the frontage and access to the northerly -most lot (Lot 3), and that corridor will be a part of Lot 3. 2. The obvious through the plat design which would provide the required 100 feet of frontage for each of the three lots would be to plat a cul-de-sac northerly from Orchard Place into the property providing access to the northerly -most lot. The problem with this is that such a cul-de-sac would, of course, be expensive and provide access to a single lot. In some case?=Pin-the' past, rather than plat such a cul-de-sac, an elongated lot configuration has been approved so as to avoid the City's obligation to maintain a cul-de-sac primarily for access to one lot. The liability on the configuration proposed to the property owners is that they will have to pay for the cost of the maintenance of the private roadway in the corridor, and they will have to build and maintain separate water and sewer lines to the three houses ultimately proposed to be constructed. Under these circumstances, it would appear that the City could consider the private access arrangement as proposed, rather than insist upon a publicly constructed and maintained cul-de-sac. If the Planning Commission and Council feel that the proposed private access system is preferable to the construction of a public street and cul-de-sac, the plat as proposed could be approved, granting a variance to the 100 foot street frontage requirement to 90 feet, 30 feet, and 75 feet. Obviously, each of the lots far exceeds the 15,000 square foot minimum lot requirement. ,a4", CASE NUMBER: 84-18 APPLICANT: Stephen Hunter Page 2 3. When the .proposal was initially presented to the City staff for review, a 20 foot corridor for the private roadway and easement was proposed. The staff suggested that it be increased to at least 30 feet which is now indicated on the platting proposal. We note, however, that the existing roadway is not located near the center of the Corridor, which could create aFkproblem in 4terms of maintaining the roadway and providing for snow Istorage on either side. The applicant should be questioned regarding their intent with respect to the driveway, and whether it is their intent to reconstruct it in the center. If not, the corridor location could be changed so as to leave the existing driveway as it is, but with appropriate space on either side for snow storage. You will note also, that the existing driveway at its intersection with Orchard Place is at an approximately 45 degree angle. We suggest that this driveway be reconstructed so as to provide a more nearly perpendicular•, access, making it a safer access and egress to Orchard Place. ` 4. Our greater concern with respect for this proposal is the indication on the plat of their intention to construct a new home on Lot 3 within the 40 foot setback required by the Critical Area River Corridor Regulations. Those regulations require that a structure be placed 40 feet back from the bluff line which you will note is indicated on the preliminary plat. We have discussed with the applicant the possibility of constructing a future home 6n Lot 3 further to the southeast, where there is obviously a great deal of space to accommodate the structure. The variance to the 40 foot setback requires that there be some form of physical hardship on the land which makes it unreasonable to require the 40 foot distance from the bluff line to the structure. It appears that in this case no such hardship exists, but it is rather a matter of convenience to the homeowner and his desire to put the structure on the bluff for purposes of a better view (as indicated by the applicant). 5. No plans have been submitted for the proposed structure and thus, an application for a variance to the Critical Area setback requirements cannot be processed at this time. At our last meeting with the applicant, we were given to understand that they were proposing to build the home the required 40 feet back. Inasmuch as the home location is generally indicated on the plat, the City may wish to ascertain at this time whether or not such a variance can logically be considered. 6. We also suggested to the applicant that any houses constructed on the three lots should be at least 45 feet away from the 30 foot side easement corridor (a part of Lot 3). This should be done so that in the event in that a future owner desires to divide the land into more than three lots, that a public street could be dedicated 60 foot wide and not infringe upon the required 30 foot setback to a residence in the R-1 District. Stephen Hunter as indicated at this time that it is the firm desire of his father and himself that the land be platted into three lots only, though they recognize that some future owner may wish to subdivide further. H. D. PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 28 August 1984 84-18 Stephen G. Hunter Northwest Corner of Orchard Place and Hunter Lane Setting of Hearing for Preliminary Plat 1. The site in question consists of approximately four acres, a portion of which is occupied by an existing home, a shed, and a summer house. The proposal is to divide the land into three lots, one of which would be utilized to accommodate a new residence *for Stephen .Hunter, son of the owner of the original site. 2. The Planning Commission may wish to discuss the proposal with the applicant inasmuch as there are two unusual features in this proposal. Firstly, so as to avoid the construction of a public street cul-de-sac, they propose to create a lot which will have 30 feet of frontage on Orchard Place. This portion of the lot, occupied by the existing driveway serving the existing residence is proposed to be 20 feet in width, and _. will be subject to a common easement for access to all the lots. This procedure has been used before in the City where access to a single lot (in the case of the original Ivy Falls Plat) is provided in this way so as to avoid the construction of a public street to serve one lot. The problem with it, however, is access for the emergency fire equipment which should be assured of adequate space to turn around at the terminus of such a private access road so as to be able to get their equipment out. 3. The other point of concern is the proposed location for the structure to be placed on Lot 3. You will note from the topographic map that the proposed location of the house is immediately contiguous to the bluff line. The Critical Area Ordinance requires a setback of 40 feet from this bluff line. Looking at the topographical map of this lot, it would appear that it would not be difficult to place the home 40 feet from the line. There is obviously a great deal of space near the enter of the lot which could accommodate a residence without a variance to the Critical Area setback provisions. 4. Provisions should also be made for the existence of the summer house, which we presume will be an accessory building other than a garage and greater than 144 square feet in area. Such an accessory building requires issuance of a Conditional Use Permit, and cannot be utilized as a principal residence. We do not see this as a critical problem, but merely one which should be accommodated in the approval process. CASE NUMBER: 84-18 APPLICANT:' Stephen Hunter Page 2 5. We just received this proposal .on Wednesday so we have not had an opportunity to view the site. In this case, it would appear helpful if members of the Planning Commission and Council prior to the public hearing would have an opportunity to view the site to ascertain the site r conditions relatives to the bluff line. 6. The action then requested of the Planning Commission at this time is for the.setting of a hearing for approval of a Preliminary Plat. The setting of a hearing for approval of any variance proposed to the Critical Area requirements should also be considered if the decision to place the house in the location proposed is to be made at this time. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO September 27, 1984 ZdTO:Mayor, City Council and CityPator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Lot Variance Fred Mike Case No. 84-20 ' DISCUSSION: Fred Mike was before the Planning Commission at their September 25th meeting to request a variance to the lot size for the first of three contiguous lots he has for sale on Simard. (See Planning Commission minutes and attached Staff memo) RECOMMENDATION Staff and Planning Commission recommend granting the requested 2355 square foot (approximate) lot size variance. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council wishes to implement the staff and Planning Commission recommenda- tion they should pass a motion granting the variance. i �az6gA7�0' Case No. F MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application c' �� Fee Paid (goAppli / ` fl Namee:: f Last/ First Initial Address: 5 �l HeDdgGLk�'l-qAA,-2141 Number &Street7 City Sta Zip 11 Telephone Number: Owner Name:_M Last First Initial Address:QO'Q 7�Z to T%' Hi'm Number & Street City State Zip Street Location of Property in Question: Legal Description of Property: cc Type of Request: Rezoning Variance Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Minor Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval Plan Approval Wetlands Permit Other CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Planning Commission September 20, 1984 FROM: James E. Danielson Paul R. Berg Public Works Director and Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Case #84-20, Minimum Lot Size Variance Fred Mike INTRODUCTION Mr. Fred Mike, 547 Simard, owns three contiguous lots across the street from his existing residence and is presently in the process of selling them individually. The lots were platted prior to 1962, therefore only need to meet 707 of today's ordinance standards for lot size and frontage. (10,500 square feet of area and 70 feet of frontage). DISCUSSION All of the lots Mr. Mike is trying to sell meet the 70 feet of frontage requirement but none of them meet the 10,500 square feet of area requirement. This first lot he has sold is approximately 8,145 square feet, or 2,355 square feet short of the minimum. The remaining two lots are larger but still do not meet the minimum. Staff has also noted from the floor plan submitted that the garage needq,o be enlarged. The City minimum size is 440 square feet. RECOMMENDATION It is noted by staff that even though the lot does not meet City minimums, the proposed home is able to be sited to meet all the other City ordinance require- ments. Staff could support granting a variance of 2,355 square feet for Lot 7, Block 3, Guadalupe Heights. JED/PRB:madlr t ti„ PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: . .PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 25 September 1984 84-20 Fred Mike Easterly of Simard Street, One Lot North of Miriam Street Approval of Variance to Lot Size ;.:1. Fred Mike owns Lots 5, 6, and 7 on the southeast side of Simard Street, platted as a portion of Block 2, Guadalaupe Heights Plat. As you all ti know, lots in. this far northeasterly corner of the City were platted many years ago when the land was in Mendota Township, prior to the formation of the Village of Mendota Heights in 1956. Consequently, many of the homes in this area of the City are developed on 60 foot lots, though in some cases homes occupy two lots or one and one-half lots. Subsequent village ordinances required a minimum lot frontage of 100 feet and a land area of 15,000 square feet. When the new ordinance was adopted in 1962 (following completion of the original Comprehensive Plan). The ordinance included a regulation that any lot in the City that was platted prior to the adoption of the Ordinance that met 70 percent of the minimum frontage and/or land area requirements, was deemed to be a buildable lot. Thus, lots smaller than 70 feet in frontage require a variance processed by the Planning Commission and Council in order for them to become buildable lots for which a building permit could be issued. 2. Fred Mike's Lots 5, 6, and 7 have lot frontages of 75 feet, 80 feet, and 100 feet respectively. Lot 5 has 10,315 square feet, Lot 6 has 8,778 square feet; Lot 7 has 9,448 square feet. Thus, each of the lot areas is about 70 percent of the required 159000 square feet. However, Lot 7 is very near 70 percent lot area criteria, that being 10,500 square -feet. At this time, Mr. Mike is applying for a variance to the lot area so as to be able to construct a new home (as indicated on the attached site plan) on Lot 7 only. Included in the packet from the City is a sheet indicating the front elevation and floor plans of the proposed structure. 3. The home is constructed on Lot 7, this would have an impact on any future division of the three lots into two larger lots in the future. Thus, it is perhaps important to look at all three lots at this time. 4. Attached is a copy of the section map of this portion of the City on which we have located the homes that have been constructed in the area. You will see that some of the homes are on 60 foot lots and some of them are on double lots. You will note that the two lots directly across from Lots 5 and 6 are 60 foot lots, each occupied by a single home. CASE NUMBER: 84-20 APPLICANT: Fred Mike Page 2 5. Attached also is a copy of the air photo of this portion of the City at a scale of 1"=200' (the same scale as the section maps). This photo though difficult to reproduce, will give you a general indication of the residential placement and density in this part of the City. 6. The important criteria to keep in mind is that the development of the smaller lots as platted should not adversely affect the quality of existing or potential development in the area. BJECT PROPERTY ALE 1-8��^^��0����0.�? -� P IE. T H- I r 4r IS -1; 07 40 I L • zz i3 ie•4k 7 I A WA r P A' r77Tv -7;1 49e, ClelWeI7.5 ZOOA -9 lb LOT 3 PERR*tADQ -a""�i�:. r -,_ sem.. R. •'ty7p..�`•'"'�,"' M�,x. .tr'�47+•+f' I' fit;, --°. sr:r Is .�•,Y..''!A �''S7� _ � � "'« i#YJ1!!� � 3� ,.v �` '!„o-� ' ot'�-•- `�+Ytr" ttvit'.'•'^�` ,'}q i♦ "ii- 'tAi fir• rp. t• I r it :amu '1 ;: • � ... � � �, jj�� 7 yp. �'1 '.'S'w.� � ,^� T +, \j, n�yh! \ �.' �F;i". ti •�+• • � .` L'.. yyt. r 1s.•,.iR' : t �F L'. �.;,•�,♦,`y7�;��j,t'.:��,,•[[Y'yyt��, t� ryt• •`R+•yy� y.��1..,{ � .` :1 �-• T= '� _I�.. *p �n ''f �}ty':�`w., , Zt *�`+•' `IMS%'�' ~ ��,i~ � •� �tta .�,'�, V���"Y, ``S• ,�•�wt• •� }C. • '�•� ry i+. i" '�`�rc . ••ij r rN� � .`.:i4 a��'. . t � .�,k ... > �`.' \° � �•,1y^'� -a S' �;i ,,,{ .t . " , f •3 t� * 7[Ir fjC-zooms f .f tl:t �.� ,. o T •.� � 1• i.r• 'H :Saf �� l:�1� 4 p�"�„+t'r"v ``' r:rl. _ ,4 t ,?;���+ r � '•,• •+ ��Lr ��•1rr,~ 46 /,'r• •��t �' , i� to ^ r ff�. I �~: •t • � `7: ..,1(ri �" +{ ^,"`'+•• -`+� rte`+.., . �' : �•rd;' , n . A ` t .♦ t '�. t �� :♦ .: ../ to �' S 1�e ti ,• 'lir �' � "` �� +• T�� 2 �t -f• 11 S.•� � f_ �` .3 ' ' 1, � —'� . E= a .,♦. *i.., �- ��j�- 3 ��L F".t�uiuJ�il'Z•4': �* �. i �. .�1i��1..\.i `« _�Jl� `•. •�+..!�; a7asr�rtlsru�+�rar y�•i eswt�+��ri•ri�a�w 5s I 1 rf IIIiI'i • �- � t fill fill'. it 1ih. 1 a.._7�./= •?�:^/� f �filll . Wo- I f, I .;����; II I �r 1111��i�'�fl'II�I�I��I'�I�il 1�4I1��!I!'!ia��li'I!ll��I�IIII,11111�GI ' '�w^� qTI 11 r 111 11 II II II I I v q ul 1 r ICI fly; >m 11 I I I , --Mr-!i - - - -- - --- i T- - w 9 ]14 ANNAFvJ-LL:i b [.,I - LO T- J.'r a AO A IE - A 7 ll c 13 ZiE 41 AVE - Kip, Ilk, I'..- t,7� LLX 'A IA ST [bT 9 COURT A, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO September 27, 1984 TO: Mayor, City Council and Cit-� Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition Job No. 8315B Improvement No. 83, Project No. 6B INTRODUCTION• Over the past year staff had been working with John Callahan and Arnold Kempe to develop Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition. An agreement had been arrived at, but Mr. Callahan determined his costs were excessive and backed out by donating the land to Brady High School and leaving the City with $7,527.70 of expenses outstanding. DISCUSSION: After Mr. Callahan donated the property, staff attempted to get Mr. Callahan to pay the $7,527 but he declined. (See attached letter) He maintained that the Church would want to dovelop the property and the City's money could then be recovered. In order to pursue that logic, I made an appointment with Tom Gagliardi,, Superintendent of Brady High School to discuss the matter. Mr. Gagliardi had Terrence Davern of Clapp-Thomssen present at that meeting; he had been retained by the school to sell the property. They both listened to us explain the past history of the lot and were interested in the past work that had been done by Callahan and the City in an attempt to develop the property. They stated that the School had no intention of retaining the property and Mr. Davern was to dispose of it in the most cost beneficial manner to the School. Finally 1 they said, they were going to study their options and would get back to us later. After some time had passed, Mr. Davern made an appointment with staff to again discuss the project. This time he brought Mr. Louis Langer with him. Mr. Langer informed us that he would take the project on as his donation to the church but that the City would need to make several concessions before the project would be worth his while pursuing. Without the concessions, Langer stated, the property would have to be left go tax forfeit. Staff listened to Langer's list of concessions but stated that the City Council would need to make the decisions on the acceptability of them. We directed that a letter outlining their proposal be submitted for Council review. That letter has been drafted and is attached. Ed Kishel, City Engineer has given me his responses to their concession requests: 1. I concur that the land should be developed. 2. Item A. It is agreeable that a grading plan may be developed to accommodate walkout basements. However, it should be part of an approved master plan which all lot owners would be required to follow. If not, maintaining proper surface water runoff, including the proposed ditch, will be difficult to control. 3. Item B, sounds simple enough but I see problems for the Council in approving individual plans as well as for staff in maintaining control of the development of each parcel. 4. Item C may be acceptable if a master plan is followed and the new lot owners are aware that a future surface water project with assessments is possi- ble. 2 5. Item D may be valid in that some of the planning may be chargeable to the extension of surface water planning and financing of future drainage to the Northeast as far as Delaware Avenue. I suggest a 50-50 split in current engi- neering costs. 6. The subdivision of Lot 2 should be accomplished before concessions are granted. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff feels that a new solution to this wetlands permit could be arrived at that meets both the School's and the City's needs and recommends that the School be directed to prepare the plans and proceed with a new application for a Wet- lands Permit together with a preliminary plat. ACTION REQUIRED: No formal action is expected at this time, only a consensus of the Council that some new solution could be acceptable according to the list presented by Clapp-Thomssen. 3 r -0- Q 1 1 —4th and Wabasha—St. Paul, Minnesota 55101—Phone (612) 291-7777 ZWO September 17, 1984 The Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive '.,"MendDta Heights, Minnesota 55120 RE: Vacant land described as IDt 2, Willow Springs Addition located on the Northeast corner of Marie Avenue and coed road Gentlemen: I am writing you on behalf of my client, Brady High School, the current owner of record of the above mentioned property. They have asked me to do a Market Evaluation of the property for the expressed purpose &or selling the property for residential development. After studying the current status of the property, analyzing the existing market for this type of property and looking at the development costs that would be associated with developing this project as it has been approved by the City Council (under John Callahan ownership) it is impossible to financially put this development together as Proposed by the City. I am aware that the City is very interested in attempting to complete this project as indicated by conversations with Mr. Jim Danielson, City Engineer. I have been in communication with a developer that would consider this project on behalf of the owner, Brady High School; however, there are a number of concerns that they have that must be addressed before they will proceed. They are as follows: A.) The City agrees to allow a revised grading and fill program that would acomur date residential homes with walkout basements. B.) The City would agree that each lot be developed as it is sold to a specific user with specific plans according to current building codes in the City of Mendota Heights. C.) There must not be any specific time allottment set for the completion of development for the entire site. f The Mayor and Members of the City council City of Ylendota Heights Page #2 D). There must be some reduction in the costs of engineering fees that have been attributed to this site by the City of Mendota Heights. E.) The final plan for development will indoubtedly have other less significant its that may or may mt need to be addressed. These items can be discussed once we have an agreement on the items listed above. We recognize that the City is very concerned about the current neighborhood attitude toward this development. I recognize as do my developers that we must satisfy the concerns of the neighbors in order for this project to be successful. Please keep in mind that if we can reach a satisfactory development plan for the site, we will comply with any reasonable requirements that would be of concern to you as well as the neighborhood. If the City is agreeable to these minimum requirements for the development of the site, then my client would be agreeable to suimit revised site plans and development program that would be in agreement with the City. I certainly appreciate the City giving this proposal its consideration and I look forward to working with you in completing a successful residential development that the City of Mendota Heights will be proud of. Best Wishes, CLAPP- S CDNPANY s. Terence Davern A July 25, 1984 --Ms Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk c/o City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 ,,,Re: Lot 2 Willow Spring Addition Improvement #83 Project #6 :,Dear Ms Swanson, By way of my attorney Mr. Arnold Kempe I have a copy of your letter to him dated June 14, 1984. After reading your letter I feel compelled to inform you of some facts that you evidently are not aware of: #1 When I started this project your engineering staff did recommend a depoist for all engineering costs of $3,600.00. We thought this to be excessive in that the moving, or shall I say straightening out of the surface water course, on my property for approximately 250' couldn't possibly involve that much time and that I shouldn't be charged for any area storm sewer study. Your engineering department did agree with us and thereby reduced the amount of escrow to $1,500.00. #2 Later I was advised by both Mr. Jim Danielson and Mr. Ed Kishel that the total charge by the City of Mendota Heights would not exceed 35% of the contractors bid for the project. Had the project gone forward, additional engineering time would have been included in the 35% of the project cost. Also the 35% cost would be specially assessed against the property and the escrow deposit returned. #3 In your letter and enclosures, I also note staff hours are claimed for work on this project after I informed your engineering department that I would not be going ahead with the project. #4 This property has been in the Callahan Family since 1854. Over the years much as been invested for taxes and various assessments. Since 1971 when I took over control of this parcel I have invested in excess of $22,000.00. Your Planning Commission, City Council, and Engineering Department were all told that if the bids came in too high to develop I would have to abandon the project,. I did fully intend to develop this property however, when the City insisted on a time limit for my filling of the property, the aspect of free fill disappeared. The added cost of buying fill would have added substantially to the total cost of the project. This rendered the project not economically feasible. Ms Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk #5 Early in May of this year I was asked by Brady High School for a contribution. Our family has helped this school for several years. I believed that my giving of this land to Brady for their sale to a developer was the best way to handle the development of this project. Sincerely, 4�John R. Callahan 324 West Moreland Avenue West St. Paul, MN 55118 JRC: kcd N t DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT CONCERNING LOT 2, WILLOW SPRINGS ADDITION SECTION 24, T28N, R23W OLD AGREEMENT MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA This agreement, made and entered into this day of , 1984, by and between the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minne- sota, (hereinafter called the "City") and John Callahan, 324 West Moreland Avenue, West St. Paul, Minnesota 55118, (hereinafter called the "Developer"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Developer proposes a plat for single family dwellings in Mendota Heights to be known as consisting of three lots on approximately 1.46 acres located in the Northeast corner of the intersection of Marie Avenue and Dodd Road presently known as Lot 2, Willow;Springs Addition; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Developer to cause filling and grading of the lots, and to make the area ready for sale as single family lots; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the two parties as follows: 1. Grading and Filling Developer agrees to fill and grade the platted area in accordance with the Grading Plan as recommended in staff report dated February 2, 1984 and attached hereto. In the grading and filling of the area, measures shall be taken to prevent any deleterious results on adjacent property. Topsoil shall be placed on all disturbed areas upon comple- tion of grading. Seeding or sodding shall be accomplished to establish a cover of vegetation as soon as possible after grading. The Developer and his agents shall use extreme care during the grading process (which includes proper timing of restoration, seeding and erosion control) to protect and maintain existing: a. Private land characteristics; b. Public land characteristics; c. Public investments such as sewer, watermains, and street surfacing facilities. Erosion control measures, as directed by City staff shall be used to prevent the erosion of any of the fill from entering the creek. •Any deterioration of adjacent property or the creek due to ero- sion, silting, soil deposition or degradation shall be corrected imme- diately upon direction from the Public Works Director. 1 2. Setbacks Setbacks, as recommended in staff report dated February 2, 1984 for both wetlands and front yard, will be adhered to unless changed by approved City Council variances. 3. Timetable h Filling and grad' ,'including the satisfactory removal,,and dis- position of unsta materials, shall be accomplished within one year of the approval o t. Lack of completion within this time frame shall permit the City to do so utilizing escrow funds or letter of credit as established hereafter. The Developer shall submit an escrow deposit or a letter of credit in the amount of $5,000.00 to be retained by the City to insure good faith performance. The escrow or letter of credit will be released to the Developer one year after final grading has been completed and a final inspection has been performed by the Public Works Director and any faults corrected. 4. Platting Developer will proceed with final platting as soon as_possible, easements as indicated on the grading and drainage plan'will be incor- porated in the final plat. Surface water handling on the site will be the developer's responsibility to include; design, construction and maintenance. Drainage easements will be located on the plat to encom- pass all ponding areas and major drainage ways. 5. Park Contribution A park contribution for this project has been calculated at $1,200.00 and payment is due at the time of final platting. JOHN CALLAHAN CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor Kevin D. Frazell, City Administrator E 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 1, 1984 TO: , Ma orCit Council and City Administrator Y Y FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Creek Relocation Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition Job No. 8315 Improvement No. 83, Project No. 6 Attached are the memos staff has completed addressing the questions raised at last month's public hearing. Staff continues to feel that the project is feasible and recommends passing a motion adopting Resolution No. 84- Accepting Engineer's Report, Ordering the Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Storm Sewers to serve Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition (Improvement No. 83, Project No. 6)., and taking other actions recommended on pages 2 and 3 of the first attached memo from Ed Kishel. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO �,n� February 22, 1984 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Ad.Zstrator FROM: Edward F. Kishel City Engineer SUBJECT: Subdivision - Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition Platting, Drainage, Filling Job No. 8315 Improvement No. 83, Project No. 6 INTRODUCTION• . Council held a public hearing on February 7, 1984 for wetlands applications and conditional use permits in anticipation of platting and developing Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition. The Developer's repre- sentative, in his presentation, indicated the need for wetlands permits and front yard' setback variances. He also requested permission to fill only the front portion of the proposed lots. DISCUSSION: The matter of front yard setbacks on the north side of Marie Avenue is discussed in a separate Staff memo dated February 22, 1984. As a part of a feasibility report dated January 18, 1984, staff recom- mended that Scheme No. 2 in that report be utilized, should platting be approved. Staff spent a considerable amount of time in designing the topography and establishing elevations to make the proposed creek relocation function properly. The creek capacity will not change and the installation of drop structures will contain the volume of water so as to keep it the same as that passing through the culvert under Dodd Road and:Marie Avenue now. Contours shown on the Scheme No. 2 drawing were designed to indi- cate recommended fill elevations, to establish building grades and to fill the property in order to maintain the creek location. Staff has continually suggested that to properly develop the site, the creek should be relocated and the property filled to grades shown as part of Scheme No. 2, and that necessary fill permits be granted. The proposed creek relocation on Lot 2, Willow Spring Addition is a minor adjustment in the surface water control for the northeast quadrant of the Dodd Road - Marie Avenue intersection. In past years, potential individual development sites prompted planning reports which made reference to the need for surface water studies in this northeast quadrant. Because no one project has been large enough, efforts have not been made to develop a surface water study of this magnitude. 1 The 1974 "Surface Water Management Study" did make reference to the fact that the drainage district consisted of some 238 acres in Mendota Heights and 178 acres in West St. Paul (Inter -community storm water projects will be the responsibility of the Upper Mississippi Watershed Management Organization now being formed). To justify such a study will require a major development or a decision by the Council to proceed before further development occurs. As a matter of interest, and to the best of our knowledge, the existing culverts under Marie Avenue and Dodd Road suffered no ill effects from the 100 to 200 year storm of August 30, 1977. The grading and drainage plan in the feasibility report indicates the maximum potential flood areas if the site is graded, as shown, before lots are sold. ALTERNATIVES• 1. Continue to proceed with creek adjustments as early individual developments occur. 2. Determine whether or not to study before additional developments 3. Wait for action by the Upper Organization. RECOMMENDATIONS: proceed with a master drainage occur. Mississippi Watershed Management In order to subdivide Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition, it is recom- mended that a Developer's Agreement be prepared which will require that the topographic plan for Scheme No. 2 of the January 18, 1984 feasi- bility report be followed and implemented prior to the sale of any one of the lots. It is also recommended that the Council delay considera- tion for the preparation of a master plan for surface water removal in the northeast quadrant of Dodd Road and Marie Avenue in that it will be studied during the formation of the Upper Mississippi Watershed Manage- ment Organization. ACTION REQUIRED• 1. Grant wetlands permits for filling with wetlands setbacks of a minimum of 50 feet from the drainageway for the westerly dwelling, a minimum of 70 feet from the center dwelling and 60 feet from the easterly dwelling. 2. Grant a Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) for filling according to the City drawing as part of Scheme No. 2 in the feasibility report dated January 18, 1984. 3: Grant front yard setbacks as shown on the Scheme No. 2 drawing establishing setbacks of 30 feet from the property line for the wester- ly and central dwellings and 40 feet for the easterly dwelling. 0 I 4. All above items should be subject to execution of a Developer's Agreement requiring the filling of the parcel before the lots are sold. S. Delay action regarding a surface water removal study for the Northeast quadrant of the Dodd Road - Marie Avenue Intersection. 3 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO n February 22, 1984 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adm istrator FROM: Edward F. Kishel City Engineer SUBJECT: Subdivision - Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition Marie Avenue Building Setbacks Job No. 8315 Improvement No. 83, Project No. 6 INTRODUCTION: In the course of hearing discussion in connection with the pro- posed subdivision of Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition at the meeting of the City Council on February 7, 1984, the matter of front yard setbacks on the north side of Marie Avenue evolved. Councilmembers requested a review of existing setbacks, variances and a history of the construc- tion of Marie Avenue in the vicinity. DISCUSSION• Marie Avenue, from Dodd Road to Delaware Avenue, has been an established 66 foot right of way for many years and was upgraded in 1974 utilizing some state aid funds. Because of established properties, it was not possible to obtain additional right of way without difficulty, thus some of the standards by which State Aid Streets are designed were waived. Most of the traveled roadway was constructed 36 feet wide and was off -set 2 feet to the North so as to allow for more boulevard room on the south side for a possible future bicycle path. Several hundred feet of street on either end were constructed to a 44 foot width to allow for turning lanes. Dwellings on the south side of Marie Avenue have a 30 foot setback from the property line except for House No. 688 which has a setback of 16 feet and a garage setback of 10 feet. This is because the struc- tures were constructed before setback requirements were established. On the North side, dwellings in Willow Springs Addition have been set back 70 feet from the property line except for Lots 4 and 5 which received variances on April 5, 1977. Council Resolution No. 77-24 granted a 60 foot setback to Lot 4 (Larry Goff) and a 50 foot setback to Lot 3 (vacant lot) to allow for a variance from the wetlands ordinance due to a creek alignment crossing the rear of both lots. 1 R RECOMMENDATION• As part of Staff's report with regard to the platting of Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition, certain minimum setbacks were recommended for each of the proposed lots. They were established to conform with a reasonable step-down of setbacks from the front property line and to maximizetheamount of distance from the wetlands, wherein a variance will be required. Staff recommends that should the subdivision of Lot 2 be granted,. that the Council establish front yard setbacks as indicated in the Staff report dated February 2, 1984. 2 City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 84 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STORM SEWERS TO SERVE LOT 2, WILLOW SPRINGS ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 83, PROJECT NO. 6) �-- >}Rj+►sEI�EAS, the developer has heretofore submitted a petition for improve - and waiver of hearing to the City of Mendota Heights for storm :,;sewers to serve Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition; and a; ;WHEREAS, the City Engineer has submitted his report to the City Council respect to the proposed storm sewer construction to serve Lot 2, Xillow Springs Addition; and s, WHEREAS, the City Engineer reported that the proposed improvement and construction thexeof were feasible and desirable and further reported on the proposed costs of said improvement and construction thereof; and WHEREAS, all costs of the improvement is to be assessed against Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the report of said City Engineer be and is hereby re- ceived. 2. That it is advisable, feasible, expedient and necessary that the City of Mendota Heights construct the above described improve- ments, and it is hereby ordered that said improvement be made. 3. That the City Engineer be and he is hereby authorized and directed to prepare plans and specifications for said improvement. 4. That said improvement shall hereafter be known and designated as Improvement No. 83, Project No. 6. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this Sixth day of March, 1984. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk � • Page 812 April 5, --;77 CASE NO. W77-6, Mr. Lawrence Goff was present to.request approval of a wetlands GOFF permit for Lot 4, Willow Spring Addition (located on Marie T uc. The Council discussed the possibility of granting a variance from the established 70 foot front yard setback to allow construction of a residence a greater distance from the creek running through the property. Planner Dahlgren, present at the meeting, reviewed the site plan and recommended that the Council grant a ten foot variance to allow construction of the home 60 feet from the property line. He also recommended that consideration be given to granting a 20 foot variance from the front yard setback requirement for the westerly contiguous lot. After a lengthy discussion, Councilman Mertensotto moved the adoption of Resolution No. 77-24, "RESOLUTION APPROVING WETLANDS PERMIT AND ATTACHING CONDITIONS THERETO, including_pprOVal ,'of a..ten •foot'•front yard setback'vsriance. for Lot=;:4� ;,a -20 ,foot 'varzarice for £ti:e5 westerly faon giiou ; Iot a Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 77-7, The Council considered an application for variance from the TOM THUMB Tom Thumb Store to allow installation of a Tom Thumb/RC Cola sign on the Tom Thumb property. After a brief discussion, Mayor Lockwood moved that the Council concur in the Planning Commission recommendation and deny th, application for variance. Councilman Schaberg seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CASE NO. W77-8, The Council acknowledged receipt of a Wetlands Permit applicatio KOCH from Dr. Gregory Koch for Lot 6, Ivy Falls Addition. After a brief discussion, it was determined that the Wetlands Ordinanc requirements are not applicable to this property. :Councilman Losleben moved that the Wetlands Ordinance requiremen be waived for Lot 6, Block 4, Ivy Falls Addition. Councilman Schaberg seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 . Nays: 0 PARK AND RECREATION The Council acknowledged receipt of the minutes of the March 30 COMMISSION Park and Recreation Commission meeting. PARK-A-RAMA The Council noted that the Park and Recreation Commission, at the March 30 meeting, had recommended that the City contribute $300 to Park -A -Rama, Inc., the money to be used towards the purchase of fireworks for the 1977 Park -A -Rama. Mr. Greg Walker co -chairman of the 1977 Park -A -Rama, was present to discuss the matter. The Council expressed their appreciation to the Park -A -Rama, Inc. for their efforts in continuing this community event and noted that Park -A -Rama days is for the benefit of all Mendota Heights residents. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 77-24 RESOLUTION APPROVING WETLANDS PERMIT AND ATTACHING CCNDITIONS THERETO WHEREAS, a natural drainageway/creek flows through the south portion of Lot 4, Willow Springs Additions and fT1s WHEREAS, said Lot 4, Willow Springs Addition falls within a Wetlands `r,District as delineated on the City's Wetlands Maps and M WHEREAS, Mr. Lawrence Goff has submitted an application for Wetlands 'permit preparatory to constructing a residence on said props rtys and WHEREAS, on March 22, 1977, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission considered said Wetlands Permit application and recommended its approval subject to conditions outlined by the City Planners NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights.that the public hearing for said permit application, as required by the Wetlands Ordinance, be waiveds and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a Wetlands Permit be approved for Lot 4, Willow Springs Addition, subject to submission to and approval of the following information by the City Administrator: a. Site topography information with contour intervals of two foot, noting the highest known water level of the creeks b: Site plan -showing the limits of grading, extent of vegetation removal and manner in which excavation is going to be disposed.ofs C. Plan to control erosion during construction, possibly including temporary stabilization of the disturbed soils by use of anchored straw mulch in the event that establishment of a permanent ground cover is not practical: in the event that a drain swale is created or exists naturally, the straw bales should be placed along the swale prior to water discharging into the receiving drainageway/creek. .. .-..... .� -. ;, iC•9:""s ...�; r`� :, r"+r}' : ' -: .'s,.: �.: y'.oa' _ ys.-f . ' +S5 v nn ineenn�e�ne� sacnr�fewti'.,:.;�.1.-rwxL''.K'a.:[wS: vftr4fwwrL3* wa.%�l�r",IRvi�iw♦"as�.vt setbacicr"reauS,rem- t �.tesCaDziSAe n�:ialnq uljy' sa, ues�assyrgranrao.F�aa. pea r t7.ow krt:anszvctionr iii's�eeiiibnce �ri:xty� feet.: fsoia the friant : PraPeity'line s" Resolution No. 77� -2- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that at such time as the owner of the property contiguous to the westerly line of Lot 4, Willow Springs Addition requests a ,-1. ­* 6w construction of a residence building permit, a variance be granitedi.t6�afi 1afif ty feet from the front property line.'a* r Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 5th day of April, 1977. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS BY Robert G. Lockwood Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO ���� September 27, 1984 TO: Mayor, City Council and City ,Coministrator FROM: Gene Lange, Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Lawn Sprinkler System for the New Fire Station INTRODUCTION The Officers of the Mendota Heights Fire Department have made it known to me that they intend to make the new station a "show place". Part of this effort will be to maintain a well -kept lawn and planting display. A big part of main- taining such a display is regular irrigation in the correct amounts. HISTORY AND BACKGROUND Based on the revised final cost estimate dated November 14, 1983, as submitted by Trossen/Wright, the Council authorized the planning stage for the new station to proceed with a cost limit of $825,000 for the project. When the formal bids were tabulated in early 1984, the other known expenses added to the project were within budget limits. The project is now over 807 completed and most of the equipment and furnishings are ordered. The projected cost of the project at this time is about $810,000, leaving $15,000 in the contingency fund. nT9rTT9RTnN The construction area of the project is 230 feet by 300 feet,plus the ponding area in front of the house. We would propose to irrigate 230 feet by 300 feet, less the ponding area, with a system designed to expand to the northern 100 feet by 300 feet at a later date. Two proposals from local contractors have been received, with a third still coming in. The low proposal received was from Mitshulis Irrigation Systems, Inc., in the amount of $4,760. The other proposal is from Southview Gardens in the amount of $5,238.34. Mitshulis Irrigation was recommended to me by Buell Brothers, who will be doing the landscaping at the site. ALTERNATIVES Provide three-inch sleeves under the blacktop driveways for access to the remote areas (these are now inplace), and consider the installation at a later date. The second alternative is to make the installation now before the sod is placed. RECOMMENDATION I would recommend installation now to insure proper irrigation of the newly planted sod, shrubs and trees. The systems would provide the proper watering for many years to come. The result would be a continuous pleasing landscape background for the new building. ACTION REQUIRED Instruct staff to proceed with the project, using the lowest proposal received. GL:madlr September 24, 1984 ov 0f -- TO: Mayor, City Council & City Adw inistrator FROM: Dennis J. Delmont, Chief of Police 090-194910011WON32 i I A 1Z I VLSI 1FATKON I A $MAX" The attached memo and contract is for transmittal to the City of Mendota. It calls for a charge of $36,900 for Police Services for 1985. When Orvi I Johnson and I negotiated the "Per Capita + 10%" contract for Lilydale in 1984, he, I and the City Council discussed the need for an equitable method of phasing Mendota into the same formula. It was determined that the Mendota contract would remain at the same amount until the Per Capita formula reached the level of the $36,900 contract price. Using the Per Capita formula for 1985, Mendota would be charged $18,414; (76.09 x 220 +- 10% + $18,414). The $36,900 figure is obviously much higher than the Per Capita figure. That the attached contract be approved and forwarded to Mendota for their approval. Council approve the attached 1985 Contract so that it may be sent to Mendota for their approval. POLICE SERVICE AGREEMENT ' THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into effective as of the 1st day of January ,1985 , by and between the City of Mendota Heights (hereinafter 'Mendota Heights") and the City of Mendota (hereinafter "Mendota ") is made with reference to the following recitals: RECITALS FIRST: Mendota desires to contract with Mendota Heights for the furnishing of police services by Mendota Heights within the territorial limits of Mendota . SECOND: Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59, as amended, authorizes Mendota and Mendota Heights to enter into an agreement providing for provision of such police services. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the foregoing Recitals, and in consideration of the terms and conditions hereinafter contained, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Provision of Police Services. Subject to all the terms and conditions herein contained, Mendota Heights, through its Police Department, shall provide twenty-four (24) hour general police services for Mendota , including, but not limited to, the enforcement of Mendota ordinances and the statutes of the State of Minnesota. The scope, extent, and every other aspect of such services, including the manner and method of provision thereof, shall be determined by the Police Department of Mendota Heights, in its sole discretion. All personnel providing such police services to Mendota shall be under the exclusive direction and control of the Police Department of Mendota Heights, and all books, records and reports, generated in connection with such police services shall be kept and maintained only at the offices of, and shall be and remain in the property of, the Mendota Heights Police Department. Mendota shall have access to such books, records and reports at reasonable business hours, but subject to any applicable State or Federal laws or regulations regarding access thereto or privacy thereof. 3C Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, demands for police services will be responded to first on the basis of the urgency thereof, and second in the order of receipt thereof, without regard to whether the location of the demanded police services is within the territorial limits of Mendota Heights, Mendota or other areas with respect to which Mendota Heights furnishes police services. However, upon receipt of a demand for police services within the territorial limits of Mendota the Police Department of Mendota Heights shall be obligated to dispatch only such personnel and equipment as, in the opinion of the officer in charge, may be available after provision for actual demands for police services within the territorial limits of Mendota Heights. In addition, the officer in charge may recall or reassign personnel and equipment then responding to a demand for police services within the territorial limits of Mendota in the event that such recall or reassignment shall, in such officer's opinion, be necessitated by the actual need for police services within the territorial limits of Mendota Heights. 2. Payment. Mendota shall pay to Mendota Heights for such police services the total of: Thirty Six Thousand and Nine Hundred Dollars ($36,900). Payment shall be made monthly, within ten (10) days after receipt of a state- ment therefore. If Mendota Heights shall receive Police State Aid by reason of provision of services under and pursuant to this Agreement, payments by Mendota to Mendota Heights shall be reduced by the amount of such aid actually received by Mendota Heights. 3. Indemnification and Release. Mendota shall indemnify and hold Mendota Heights harmless from and against all claims, causes of action, damages, liabilities, costs and expense, including attorneys' fees, which may be asserted against or incurred by Mendota Heights as a result of the acts or omissions of Mendota its agents, servants, representatives, or employees, or as a result of the negligent acts or omissions of the Mendota Heights Police Department, its agents, servants, representatives or employees in furnishing, failing to furnish or delay in furnishing police services to the extent that such negligent acts or omissions are not covered by insurance obtained by Mendota Heights; provided that Mendota -2- shall not indemnify nor hold Mendota Heights harmless for intentional or grossly negligent acts or ommissions of the Mendota Heights Police Department or its agents, servants, representatives, or employees. Mendota Heights agrees that Mendota Heights Police Officers will be insured while working in Mendota to the same extent that they are insured while working in Mendota Heights. 4. Term. This Agreement shall commence as of the lat day of January,1985 , and shall remain in full force and effect until terminated by either party by the giving of not less than ninety (90) days prior written notice of termination to the other party. 5. Notices. All notices, offers, requests, and other communications from either of the parties hereto to the other shall be in writing and shall be considered to have been duly given or served if sent by first class certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the party at its mailing address, or to such other address as such party may hereafter designate by written notice to the other party. 6. Waiver. The waiver by either party of the breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach of such or any other provision. 7. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be subject to and governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 8. Headings. The headings of the paragraphs and subparagraphs of this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and do not form a part hereof and in no way interpret or construe such paragraphs and subparagraphs. 9. Parties in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of Mendota and Mendota Heights. 10. Entire Agreement. This instrument contains the entire agreement of the parties. It may not be changed orally but only by an agreement in writing signed by the party against whom enforcement of any waiver, change, modification, or discharge is sought. -3- 11. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. 12. Enforceability. If any part of this Agreement or any part of any provision hereof shall be adjudicated to be void or invalid, then the remaining provision hereof not specifically so adjudicated to be invalid shall be executed without reference to the part or portion so adjudicated, insofar as such remaining provisions are capable of execution. 13. Fines. Mendota shall be entitled to all money collected from fines imposed for offenses and violations of all laws and ordinances occurring within the City of Mendota and Mendota Heights shall pay over to Mendota all such fine money which is collected by or paid to Mendota Heights. Mendota and the Mendota City Attorney shall retain control of the prosecution of all offenses and violations of laws and ordinances committed within the City of Mendota , including traffic offenses and violations, which are customarily prosecuted by the City Attorney. 14. Authority. Police officers of the Mendota Heights Police Department are hereby given the authority, power and jurisdiction to enforce the statutes and laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Mendota within the territorial limits of the City of Mendota . This paragraph is intended as a grant of authority and does not impose any additional obligations which are not otherwise contained in this Agreement. -4- t r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. Dated: THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By: Its Mayor Dated: Attested: By: Its City Clerk Dated: THE CITY OF MENDOTA By: Its Mayor Dated: Attested: By: Its City Clerk Approved by City of Mendota Heights City Council pursuant to Resolution dated Approved by City of Mendota City Council pursuant to Resolution dated -5- T ' 1 a ' . s September 27, 1984 T0: Mayor and City Coutlell� City Administrat FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: Marie Avenue jQjpaad.. Survay In response to the Council's request, a survey was done of the traffic an Marie Avenue near Callahan. Vehicles were clocked between 7:00 a.m. and 8:15 a.m. on 9/21/84, and between 2:30 and 3:20 p.m. on 9/26/84. Both east and west bound traffic was charted. The speed limit is 30 m.p.h. 426 vehicles were clocked. The average speed of all vehicles was 36.5 m.p.h., with 364 (851) going in excess of 30 m.p.h., and 82 (19%) exceeding 40 m.p.h. No action is required by the council. Selective traffic enforcement will be used in the area when time permits. This should solve the problem for quite a while. TIME : 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 .......... .......... .......... .......... ....... .......... 8:15 14:30: ........ 14:45 : 15:00 : 15:20 .......... .......... .......... ................. .......... .......... .......... ........... .................... 4243 30 35 39 : .................. 45 .................. : 30 : .......... 37 ......... : .......... 43 : .......... 43 ................. .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... ' 37 39 41 , 32 37 .......... 31 .......... .......... 33 .......... 40 ..................... 38 31 ................. .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... 36 41 40 30 34 .......... 39 41 .......... 40 .......... 43 : .......... 39 .................. .......... .......... .......... ........... ......... 34 40 41 35 46 .......... 38 .......... 33 31 .......... 35 39 ...... ................. .......... ........ .......... ........... .......... 31 32 40 35 37 .......... 30 .......... .......... 32 .......... 34 ..................... 34 39 .................. .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... 45 33 36 32 .......... 34 .......... 33 36 .......... 35 : .......... 37 .................. .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... 33 3 3 42 30 .......... 38 .......... .......... 37 .......... 35 .......... 30 .......... 39 ............................ .......... ...................... .......... 37 37 : 42 30 .......... 3 4 .......... 35 .......... 30 ..................... 3 5 29 .................. .......... .......... ...................... .......... 30 35 : 41 37 ..................... 42 : 35 28 ...... 35.:...34. : .................. ......... .......... .......... ........... .......... 40 39 37 31 ................................ 37 36 31 35 34 .................. .......... .......... ......... ........... ................................................................. 36 36 31 35 41 37 31 30 34 .................. .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... 33 48 43 40 ...................................................... 42 : 32 : 30 : 30 : 40 ............................ .......... .......... ........... .......... 38 *- 30 44 37 ....................................................... 31 : 32 : 28 : 30 : 30 .................. .......... .......... ........... ........... .......... 37 42 32 36 ...................................................... 30 35 30 31 31 ................. .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... 39 42 37 37 ...................................................... 30 : 35 : 33 : 30 : 40 .................. .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... 32 42 32 30• ...................................................... 33 : 35 : 35 : 36 : 35 ................. .......... .......... ........... ........... .......... 34 35 30 ...................................................... 30 35 40 ..................... 28 32 .......... 35 .................. .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... 41 35 32 46 ..................... 36 .......... 32 ....... 30 ...: : .......... 32 .......... 35 .................. .......... .......... .......... ........... 41 32 38 ...... 35 .......... 44 37 ..........:,...37..:...43.,. 38 : .................. .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... 40 43 30 45 .......... 35 .......... 35 .......... 30 .... 35..:....3?.. .................. .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... 35 34 30 37 .......... 40 .......... 35 30 .......... 34 .......... 39 ........................... .......... .......... ........... 37 42 30 38 .......... 39 .......... .......... 3$.....30.....37, *: ......... 41 .................. .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... 37 35 30 40 .......... 35 ........ 38 .......... 30 ...... 36 I ... .......... 47 .................. .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... 41 35 37 34 .......... 40 .......... 37 .......... 33 .......... 30 .......... 42 .................. .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... 37 38 37 45 .......... 45 .......... 30 .......... 30 .......... 35 .......... 39 .................. .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... 48 30 40 34 .......... 35 .......... 32 .......... 30 .......... 34 .......... 39 .................. .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... .35 39 :-- 35 31 .......... 45 .......... 39 33 34 .......... 44 ............................ .......... .......... ........... .......... 42 40 ..- 41 37 .......... .......... .......... 37 .......... 35 .......... .......... 31 ......... 39 .......... .......... .......... ........... ................ 39 29 42 39 ........... .......... 40 ....41.......32.....33.... .................. .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... 37 35 43 . 42 .......... .......... 37 .......... 43 .......... 30 ......... 41 .................. .......... .......... ...... ........... :-- 4.1 32.. 38..: ..... 43 .......... .......... 3 5 i 47 .......... 35 ...... 31 .. .................. .......... ..... ... ..... ...... 41 35 35 ..... 37 .......... 34 .......... 43 .......... 35 ...... 31 .. .................. .......... .......... .......... ........... 38 36 41 ..... 39 ..................... 35 .......... 30 .......... 35 ...... 31 .................. .......... .......... .......... ................. 39 34 29 : 38 .......... .......... 32 .......... 35 .......... 35 ......... 4, 3 .................. .......... ...... ....................................................... 41 37 35 38 .......... 37 .......... 31 30 ...... ..................:..........:..........:.....32..:......3 .... .......... 8 37 ..................... 38:..43. .......... 30 ......... 35 .................. .......... ........... .......... 34 32 41 ..................... .......... 43 .......... 37 .......... 30 ......... 37 .................. .......... ........... 48 40 ....... ..................... 35� 35 .......... 45 .......... 35 ......... 38 .................. .......... ........... .......... 38 46 ..................... 39 37 40 30 ......... 35 ........... I ...... .......... ........... .......... 38 49 35 .......... ........................... 47 .......... 40 .......... 30 ......... 31 .................. .......... .......... ........... .......... 38 38 46 41 ........ 32.. .....3...2 .. ...... .................. .......... ........... .......... 40 41 36 .......... .......... 42 30 .......... 32 ...... .................. .......... ........... .......... 37 3636 I ... ........0 4 .. .......... 31 .......... 41 ......... .................. .......... ........... .......... 41 46 32 .......... 37 40 35 43 32 37 30 � .......... �.......... �.......... �........... �.......... �.......... �.......... �.......... �.......... �.......... | � � � 43 � 44 � � � � 36 � 30 � -------------------'-------^'---------''^---''' -` � � � � 43� � � � � 3�� ---'--------------^-----~'----^---''--....... ---- � � � � ]8� � � � � 41 � ------^^---------'''—^'---------'--^—___----''' '` � � � � 40 �7 � � � � � � -----`--------^—~--~^^^'—'--------------------' � 41 � � � � � 37� `'''~'''--^--'—''r'—'----~—~^~~--`^''-----_ .......... .......... .......... ���7 � � �� '--'—'--'--'----'---~^--^^^'~'--^—'----'—^'-'~^--'---'---' � �� � � � � � �7 � '^—'--^^'---'----~'---^^-------'''''.......—'--'--~~^^'-^—'--- � � 31 � � � � � 30 : —''—^^^----'-----''-^^—^'-'—``~'—^`---^^^^—'—'------'----- 31 47 � ^'--^'---^'—^``~^'''^~^^^^~'``'—'~~'-^^^—^^'~^^---`—'—~'`___,---'—' �A � � � � � � � � � 33� .-.^------...-----.—..----...—..—..—.---------.------.. 49 40� ................... .......... -----^--........... ^^--^'--''--'--___.......... .......... 33 39 � -,.--.^.~.,----.—..'--...~.---...—.,.--,—..---...... ....—........... .......... 29� � � 32 � ^~'-'---'--^^~^'--'--^~---~^'~^^~^^^-~^^''---~~^'---^---'--' � � �` � �� � —.-.-.---.......... � � � � �� ..� ---_---.—.----._.----....---.-------.--.--..----.--.—. � � � � � �9� —,---.-------..------..—.---------.—.---.--_.-.... .......... � � � � � � � �1 � --------------�`''---------------------'`--' � � � � � �� � ---..-----..—,---.—.—_---.-.--.---..—.—.-..---------.—_ �� [� _____..�___.�__._�____�,..__..�___.�___.�___.�___.�_..__�___. | � � � � � � � � � 36 � ------`---'--'--^'-----~^~^—''--'---'~----'—'—'--'''' 3�� -----'-----^-^--'—'^^---'------'----^-----------'' � � ��� ---.._—.---.—.--_--..--.—.----------_----------- � � .� 4�� ---'^--'----^--'---~--------'--------^^--^--~'---'' � �� � --------.—..--..—.--.---.~-------..---.-------..--..... .,, � � �� ..� —.-----.—.----------.,...-------.---..--~--......—..---. � � � � � � � � � �� � -----------.-...--..-_.—.-----.—..—.—..,--...-.---~---.-... � � � � � �� � —.-.--.-----..—...--..,-..----.—..—.—.----------..-------.—.. � � ' � � �� � —.—.---.—.--. ----~.—...---------.------.----.—...... .......... � � � � ' � � � � � ��� —.—.--...---. --------'..---.--.~.—..--..-------... � � � � �� � --.—.—.--.---.--.----.-...—..--..--.—..—.--.--.—.~—. . .......... ---.—.--. � � � � �7 � —^—^^—^^^~--^`'----'—'---^^^^'—'^---^^---^^~^----`---^- � 4� —� '—'--'—^^^''-~' ~'~—'^^^^''—'-----~'--~^'--'---~--'`—^'----'—^ 40 � —......--.......... ..................... .,.--_..---...~^--....~—.~.......... .......... � �� � ----.------.-----_---~_..---~---_.-.----.-----_--.......... .......... � �� � ..--,__---._.-....-.--.^.....,-~..--...~...,....-^._—...,,.......... .......... � � � �� � �..—.-...-�..—.—�..,--�....-�—.--.�.-_...�—.....�...—.�---.�.,..—.�.. � '''� � � � ---'~^'^---'-----`--~'~^'~'—'—~^^^---''---^—'-'---^'-'— ' #OfVehD� 5 � 34 � 46 � 58 � �4 � �� � 44 � 4� � �� �40 --^^'~---'—^'---`^^'--'---`—'—^^^—^^---'-----~^^^'--^''^ /Ve730 5 33 42 48 40 24 42 31 63 ~---''-------'~^^`'^—^'-------'—'~---'~^^'-'`''----^^`'-- 37 over 40 � 1 � 9 � 14 � 18 � 8 � 6 � 6 � 6 � 7 � ---^---'~^—^-----'`—'—^----''--''--^—'^—^~''''--^'—^'—''—'—'' ave speed 36 38.2 37.4 3R.6 37 37.2 3G.2 34.6� 34.8 —''--------^`---^--------'-----------^—'~------- over 40 � D.2 � D.26 � 0.31 � U.31 � 0.18 � 0. 22 � 0.14 � D.13 � 0.O9 � .�.�.----------------.-------------------.----.. �t��A/�L��� � ��2�� :Ave /� � 36/'�`p� � /�o�i 1u -�9.5 -----^^'-------------'----------------'''---'''`l � 19 'ale | yed For:..... Rick Mike WAYNE McLAGAN, Consultai ... ....... .......... . I.Linch-m-30.. leet_......_ . ......... DESCRIPTION Lot 7,, Block 2, GAUDALUPE HEIGHTS, according to the plat thereof on file in the office of the County Recorder. Dakota County, Minnesota. indicates iron I CO co Qcl YNYRNAN M140/N6It616N• t•rwl ` m wwvw lMw+"t • 3at r«Ire 0 L40 Swwyuy • Land p6w" I Mon off" 671 sm 6675 NNlwray No. 66 N.E. Minrwoolir, Minnewta 6432 Souih 011K* 660.010 12350 River Ride Blvd. awnwnla, Mwwfata 7 DESCRIPTION SKETCHt FOR LAWRENCE J. CULLIGAN THAT PART OF LOT 17, BLOCK 1, VALLEY VIEW OAK, DAKOTA COUNTY,+ MINNESOTA, ACCORDING TO THE RECORD PLAT THEREOF, LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE; BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 17 THENCE NORTHWESTERLY A DISTANCE OF 156:.56 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17, DISTANCE 22.00 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF THE CORNER COMMON TO LOTS 16 AND 17 OF SAID BLOCK 1, VALLEY VIEW OAK AND THEIR TERMINATING, NOTE: THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR DESCRIPTION PURPOSES ONLY AND NO MONUMENTS HAVE BEEN SET IN CONNECTION HEREWITH. i 1uWNhed: AN11 Righin Rarrwd 7e 6/_ N 0033'00":OV r 700-011 --.-?TC / SOO L t 7- /9.7 00 .7 — r—. 211.41 - !--/, T 3000 -v'x & //5.84 13.43 % 'j ON le ex :96 kw z v j. N 60 ZS - IN 00 oo� thwest eenrlm,- No.- as e d=seo7tro" $l fioi 286. /0 :J L±,L- ,) _J tj Iry q7— 86 jo- N 0 41 '20 -,W 3979339793lbo Jv .d.1 HILL 130AD , 53,\ '��l 1.3-0 . - A .3-0 11VV1%ff",W 4ZI25P 16 5 A y11 �` 1 /�' �� ,E M1� `.�' .� ,�a f o'�+� 20 37509 NOO 17 147001 't ON and jpan t I 11;7e d. 8 Po mto-- Ail N k7 South Lint of Govt 01)7,tol, 10 to uk 12 750 13.rr Or— r—Av-th t imle v/ &FA of Sm. tar, daTd6 30171 1.7.070 :--West line opl',ehe XW fiti e'r # /lire Na\