1984-08-21CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
August 21, 1984 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order. ; �j 7
2. Roll Call. — rt�z
3 . Adoption of Agenda. )I� -71 7,, 4 76
4. Consent Calendar:
a. Acknowledgement of Treasurer's report, July.
b. Acknowledgement of letter from Mn/DOT on Bikeway Grant Applications.
c. Acknowledgement of memo on Infiltration/Inflow Summary.
d. Adoption of Resolution Listing 1984 Primary Election Judges.
e. Acknowledgement of memo on County Road Turnback Program.
f. Acknowledgement of memo on new Fire Station Construction.
g. Approval of the List of Claims.
h. Approval of the List of Contractor Licenses.
i. A prov 1 °ofQ t/��j List of Club On -Sale Liquor Licenses.
3.
End of Consent Calendar.
5. Citizen Comments and Requests:
6. Response to Citizen Comments and Requests:
a. > Memo on Condon Cul-de-sac. (Thomas Condon; 2535 Dodd Road) . -SLR-
b. Memo on Quehl Drainage Compla' Neal Quehl, 968 Sou ane).
—
c.
�..� .�-� _
c. Memo on Cherry Hill 2nd Additioniur�ace Wate Runoff. (A olphus Gaddy,
1387 Farmdale Road). - �� t -7/r-
7. Unfinished and New Business:
a. Memo o u e dditio Park Prop e ty.—
b. Feasibility ort Re on Cla -- t ,
Report pp-Thomssen Planned Unit Development.
C. Memo oncerning 1984 Use p IndustTial Development Bonda attached.
proposed Resolutions) . i% ��y��yd.6 �.�
d. Memo Concern g Recpn ideration of isi ation Convent Fill and Wetlands
Perra_it. 7Ylo�
e. Memo and rop sed Ordinance Repealing Ordinance No. 1005. —
f. Memo nd Pr osed Ordinance 72",-
ohibit' g Bar ecues in Multiple Dwelling
Buildings. �.6r� �"
g. Memo and Propose Re olutio on Handicapped Accessibility.
August 21, 1984 Agenda
Page Two
h. Memo on Proposed 1,9841I
ay Schedule.
i. Memel on Identif' tion of Potential Community Development lock Grant
Projects. 2 -r-&- W- -P41-70-- . 10:4 )�l . _ ip, -,t
j. Memo on County Legislative Committee.
k.o ,embershi in Suburban�Rate A�}ority.� ,
8. Response to Council!oFWtsques
dt�
a. Memo on Speed Limit on Lexington Avenue from TH 110 to Mendota Heights
Road.
9. Council Comments and Requests.''
0. Adjourn. � �, f'����. _ �. DOp-�y, .
w
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
TREASURER'S REPORT - July 1984
Balance Collateral
DAKOTA COUNTY STATE BANK
Checking Account $ 84,177.56
Savings Account 372.97
C.D. Due
Savings Certificates 9-27-84 @ 9.88% 25,000.00
TOTAL 109,550.53
Collateral - Bonds 320,000
Govt. Guar. 100,000 $420,000
Cherokee State Bank
C.D. Due 1-30-85 @ 11.4% 250,000.00
C.D. Due 7-07-85 @ 12.75% 300,000.00
C.D. Due 12-04-84 @ 11% 125,000.00
Savings Cert. 9-3-84 @
9.22% 13,952.59
TOTAL 688,952.59
Collateral - Bonds 1,300,000.00
Govt. Guar. 100,000.00 1,400,000
MINNESOTA FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN
C.D. Due 9-12-84 @ 10.15% 100,000 100,000
Collateral, Govt. Guar.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ST. PAUL
C.D. Due
Collateral - Bonds
Govt. Guar. 100,000
U.S. TREASURY BILLS
DUE 3-21-85 630,000 (AM) (10.60) $568,375.60
9-13-84 700,000 (1st) (10.20) 666,345.17
11-15-84 325,000 (Dk) 308,092.96
11-01-84 850,000 (Dk) 777,257.71
Repo L. Shaughnessy
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $3,218,574.56
�NNESOt
pyo Minnesota
n r [)ep lrinlCnt of -rransportatiOI1
� a
Transportation Building
Fti 5Q° Sl. Paul, Minneso (Z) 55155
rOF TRPS
July 31, 1984
James E. Danielson, P.E.
Mendota Public Works Director
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Phone 296-3420
CITY OF Pler 00TH HE1GHE
ENIGli-l-E-ERING DEPT
AUG U 9 1984
h:Re: Bikeway Grant Applications y �
:.Dear Mr. Danielson: L� .
,,y :As you know from our letter of May 18, no bikeway construction monies were appropriated
to the Minnesota Department of Transportation during the last legislative session.
Because funding is unavailable at this time, it is not appropriate to comparatively
evaluate the 125 projects in detail. However, the Bicycle Transportation Unit staff has
reviewed the projects and placed them in major categories for your information in
determining whether or not to seek another source of funding for your project.
There are four categories: 1) significant project, 2) contingency project, 3) on trunk
highway system and 4) ineligible. The "significant project" category indicates that a
project substantially meets the program's criteria. The "contingency project" category
indicates that a project appears to be lacking in one or more areas such as service area,
system continuity or current unsuitability for bicycling. In some instances insufficient
data was provided with the application materials. The "on trunk highway system" category
is used to identify projects submitted which are along the state trunk highway system.
An evaluation of each of these projects is being sent to the appropriate Transportation
District office, so that the project needs can be incorporated into highway programs
where possible. "Ineligible" indicates that a project does not fit within the scope of
the program. We have categorized the project(s) you submitted as follows:
CR 43 From: Mendota Hgts. Rd. Significant
To . Marie Ave.
MSAS 103 From: Pilot Knob Rd. Contingency
To . Lexington Ave.
MSAS 101 From: Victoria/Co. Rd. 45 Significant
To Lilydale Rd.
As mentioned in the letter of May 18, all project applications will remain on file unless
we receive written request to withdraw projects from consideration for possible future
funding. Local support will be a major factor in positive funding decisions at the next
legislative session. Contacting your legislators regarding bikeway construction needs
will provide them with the information they need to make effective decisions.
If you have any comments or questions regarding your project(s) please contact Nancy
Mahle at (612)296-1650 or Patricia Bursaw at (612)296-1251.
Sincerely,
F.C. Ma• all, A std an o ioner
Technical Services Division An Equal Opportunity Employer
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 13, 1984
TO: Mayor, City Council & City A; trator
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Infiltration/Inflow Summary 1984
Staff has concluded its 1984 Sanitary Sewer Sealing program. Enclosed is
the final tally:
Estimated volume of leaks sealed in 1984 = 77,000 gallons/day
77K gal. x 76.6�/K gal. (MWCC cost) x 365 days = $21,500 savings/year.
AMOUNT SPENT 1984
Solidification Inc. $ 7,999.50
Service @ 1303 Sylvandale 3,250.00
Tom Olund 600.00
Engineer Enterprise 6,000.00
- $17,850.00
AMOUNT BUDGETED 1984
Originally Budgeted $10,000.00
Overrun as reported to Council 3,900.00
Additionally Authorized by Council 4,000.00
$17,900.00
The $17,850.00 spent is less than the $21,500 savings/year, so the City will more
than pay for the work completed within one year.
Staff feels we had a successful first year in reducing sanitary sewer infiltration
and will continue to recommend the program in future years.
ACTION REQUIRED
For information only.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -
RESOLUTION LISTING 1984 PRIMARY ELECTION JUDGES
WHEREAS, according to State Statutes, the list of State Primary election
judges must be adopted by City Council.resolution; and
>.�,.' 'WHEREAS, the following list of persons have been named as Primary election
:j:udges"•for the September 11, 1984 Primary election:
.:,,;;PRECINCT #1, Somerset School, 1355 Dodd Road
7
_> ..'-Ruth Grunke, Captain
1155 Dodd Road
457-3529
_••"D
;';'` �•.D..
June Wagner
1392 Farmdale Rd.
451-6199
,R.
Sally Countryman
648 Ivy Falls Avenue
457-4770
< D.
Mary Doherty
664 Maple Park Drive
457-8355
`• R.
Eileen Mullen
1288 Dodd Road
457-3554
I.
Lucille Curtis
589 Valley Lane
457-2524
PRECINCT #2, Bank Building, 750 South Plaza Drive
D.
Laurita Weinzettel, Captain
2140 Dodd
Road
454-4659
R.
Betty Anderson
2119 Patricia
452-1248
R.
Virginia Simek
814 Hazel
Court
454-6247
D.
Betty Moen
2319 Swan
Drive
454-7985
R.
Nancy Kruse
902 Cheri
Lane
454-3854
D.
Rita Maczko
907 Cheri
Lane
454-1628
PRECINCT #3, Mendota School, 1979 Summit Lane
D.
Marsha Knuth, Captain
740
Mohican Lane
454-7053
D.
Joan Smith
1818
Faro Lane
452-3048
I.
Marcella Sundberg
1838
Faro Lane
454-4379
R.
Annabel Randolph
541
W. Emerson
457-3863
R.
Marge Koepke
1423
Farmdale Road
457-1350
R.
Jan Gaynor
1769
Lansford Lane
452-2108
PRECINCT A, Henry Sibley High School, 1897 Delaware Avenue
D.
Marjorie Cheesebrow, Cap't.
594
W. Marie Avenue
454-1140
R.
Pat Burow
654
- 1st
Avenue
457-3735
D.
Edwina Burrows
668
- 1st
Avenue
457-6658
D.
Theresa Redding
720
W. Wentworth
454-1812
R.
Joan Frank
774
Lower
Colonial Drive
457-1364
R.
Sue Guiton
822
Ridge
Place
454-1418
PRECINCT
#5, ABSENTEE BALLOT, City
Hall, 750
South Plaza Drive
R. Arvid Rued 787 Keokuk Lane 454-4698
D. Marilyn Nelson 894 Wagon Wheel Trail 454-1624
R. Evelyn Fischer 1733 Lansford Lane 454-1150
I. Pat Burke 707 Decorah Lane 454-3464
RECEIVING CENTER, 750 South Plaza Drive
D.
Marilyn Nelson
894 Wagon Wheel Trail
454-1624
R.
Arvid Rued
787 Keokuk Lane
454-4698
I.
Mary Shaughnessy
27 Dorset Road
454-1100
I.
Margaret Baumgartner
1480 Somerset Ct.
457-1480
I.
Rosemary Murphy
1696 James Road
454-1880
COUNTING CENTER, Inver Grove Heights City Hall
R. Nancy Kruse
D. Rita Maczko
902 Cheri Lane
907 Cheri Lane
454-3854
454-1628
NOT THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights, that the preceeding list of names are designated as 1984 Primary
Election Judges.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 21st day of
August, 1984.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Robert G. Lockwood
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
.1 .
August 17, 1984
c3'Os, Mayor, City Council, & City "Inisa" for
Z: XF{ROI�:: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
�r,.:'.:.:iSUBJECT: County Road Turnback Program
INTRODUCTION
Dakota County has been working on a program to turn over to the Cities
County Roads that no longer serve a County function.
nTC/'TTCCTnWT
I have now received notice from Robert Sandeen, Dakota County Highway ,
Engineer,that the County Board of Commissioners has taken action to turn back
to Mendota Heights Victoria Road, (CR 45), in 1985, and Wagon Wheel Trail,
(CR 16), in 1989. Because of the fact that a portion of Victoria Road is in
Lilydale, I called Mr. Sandeen to ask how that problem will be handled. He
told me that the turn back date for Victoria Road will be delayed until an
agreement can be completed between Lilydale and Mendota Heights addressing
the maintenance of the road. He further stated that he will work with the
cities on that agreement but wanted to delay until this winter when his
workload is less. This action should have no impact on the City's 1985
Road Budget because the County will continue to plow snow on Victoria through
the 184-185 season, and the road has recently been patched and overlayed.
ACTION REQUIRED
No action required. This memo is for information only.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
. )_ August 17, 1984
TO: Mayor, City Council and City ministrator
,;:,�tEROM: Gene Lange, Fire Marshal
;.SUBJ;ECT: New Fire Station Construction
-''`Synopsis of Construction Progress:
The beginning of construction in early May was slowed by heavy and
frequent rain storms. Once the weather cleared in late May, construction
went ahead with little down time. By the first of July, construction was
beginning to get ahead of the posted schedule. Now in mid-August, construction
is about six weeks ahead of schedule, with the completion date, per the
construction progress meeting of August 6th, being moved up from November 30,
1984, to mid-October, 1984.
By the first of September, the building will be, water tight. All of the
interior block work, frame walls, and concrete floors will be completed. The
final grading will be done the first week of September, with the blacktopping
scheduled for the middle of September. The landscaping will follow, completing
the exterior of the project ahead of schedule.
I have been receiving enthusiastic cooperation from members of the Fire
Department's Building Committee in selecting equipment and furnishings for
the project. They have also met with members of Trossen and Wright to select
the colors for the interior surfaces and furnishings.
We are still within budget with over $21,000 in the contingency fund. The
only major unknown expense at this time is the cost of protecting the sewer
and water lines that run from the house and under the ponding area. Once
the grading for the pond is completed, there will be about four feet of cover
on these utilities. The engineers have met to discuss the problem and have
decided that the solution to the lack of cover will be to put two inches of
rigid insulation over the two lines and then a cover of dirt and sod. The cost
of this solution is estimated to be about $500, which would leave about $20,500
in the contingency fund.
GL:madlr
8/21/84 CLAIMS
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT _ __ _ ..VENDOR. ..
40.38 B&J AUTO SPLY
40.38 s/. _.. �.._.....
15-Engr
20 -Police
30 -Fire
40 -Code Enfc
ITEM DESCRIPTION
SEAL BEAK/SCREW
60 -Utilities
70 -Parks
80 -Planning
90 -Animal Conl
-ACCOUNT N0.
01-4330-440
65.00 ^~
BULLSEVE RELOADING
AMMO -�� -
�~ 01-4305-020-;
65.00 #/
24.95
CENTRAL POLICE DEPT
LENS RESTORER
01-4330-440—;
24.95 */
20.83
COMM TffSPT ACCTG SEC
CONTR RPR a
T 01-4268-420-'.
20.83 +�
2, 400:'00""� "` _ "
DAKOTA` -COUNTY ._
POLICE TRNG
01-4400-020-20--
11.60
DAKOTA COUNTY
PRCO&PRTG
01-4300-110-1
2,411.60 *_
566.88 _
E L MARKETING _.._
BALLOT ^ CARO
01-4300-650-1
5 66 .'8M
80.16
GENERAL SAFETY&EQ
SNORKEL PARTS
01-4330-460—?
80.16.
37.50
I I M C
9MOS 85DUES
01-1215-000—C
12.50
I I M C
3MOS 84DUES
01-4404-110-1
50.00 ., f, ..__......_..._...._...__.._....__._,
_...... _
.. _.
51.49
NEENAH FOUNDRY
GRATE
15-4330-475-4
25.00
AMER CAST IRON PIPE
RFD DEPOSIT
87-4283-812-0
—25.00...*/_....�._...._..___.._...�.._.�..
...
...a
25.00
S J LOUIS CONST INC
RFD DEPOSIT
87-4283-812-0
25.00—.*,._
_.__. _ _ _
_ _. . _.._.T
—
_ '
63.60
PERSONNEL WORLD
M MEYER
01-4130-050-5
63.60 --
PERSONNEL -WORLD
M MEYER
01.-4130-070m7
318.::0
PERSONNEL WORLD
M MEYER
01-4130-110-1
127.20
PERSONNEL WORLD
M MEYER
01-4130-110-1
_—PERSONNEL WORLD---
M. MEYER-- ___.. _ __
.___. _.,15-!.130-060-1
636.00 *�
49900—
- ROAD--RIUSCUE
2201 SOUNDOFF ETM
01-4610-020-2
48.00 *�
-4.83 �_- —_- SPEED—PRINT.•.- _ — ._ .
•- ZOORD_..CO.UERS
01-4300-110-1�
4.83 *i
30.09
-.ST TR€ASSURPROPFO
MBR DUES
f
01-4404-110-1:
30.0 0 *i
7,p445..00,_ .-------.—;TAMES--STEELE CONST
PYMT 2 RE FS
16-4460-850-0,
07,445.30 *�
3*702.75
SOLIDIFICATION INC
SEALSAN SUR LINES
15-4268-477-6'
60.00 ALBINSON FLAGG TAPE
60.00 +�
66.60 ANDERSEN 7 -'ARL FLASSO BRACKETS
66.60 #�
39186.00
CHECK
REGISTER
29054.00
AMOUNT __.. _....._.____.
_V-ENDOR _ .,
_ ITEM DESCRIPTION_
39702.75
21*78
AT & T INFO SYSTEMS
AUG SVC
62.00
LMCIT
ADDTL
LIAB AUTO
74.00
LMCIT
ADDTL
LIAB CAS
10.00
...BLJ_AUTO SPLY.
ROTORS
13.18
ECONOMICS PRESS
ONE YR
SVC
13.18 *i
10.11 •••--
-BD -WATER - COMMISSION
39620.75
TELE TERMINALS
IBM SU
SYSTEM
39620.75 *.
BD WATE)R COMMISSION
JUL SVC
30.34
60.00 ALBINSON FLAGG TAPE
60.00 +�
66.60 ANDERSEN 7 -'ARL FLASSO BRACKETS
66.60 #�
39186.00
ARNESON FUEL OIL SVC
NO LEAD
29054.00
ARNESON FUEL..OIL SVC
REGULAR
59240.00 *i
21*78
AT & T INFO SYSTEMS
AUG SVC
3*59
AT_& T_INFO SYSTEMS
AUG SVC
4*91
AT 8 T INFO SYSTEMS
AUGS VC
30.28 +�
10.00
...BLJ_AUTO SPLY.
ROTORS
14*50
B&J AUTO SPLY
NUTS/SCREWS
24.50
10.11 •••--
-BD -WATER - COMMISSION
JUL SVC
10.11
BO WATER COMMISSION
JUL SVC
10.12
BD WATE)R COMMISSION
JUL SVC
30.34
81.98 CITY MOTOR SUPPLY MISC PARTS
80.98 *
ACCOUNT NO* IfAk
01-4250-110-10a
01-4250-110-10 a
05-4402-105-15 9.
01-4620-110-10 I
05-4305-105.-15
1
01-4420-050-50
4
01-1210-000-00 C
01-1210-000, ' C
01-4210-020-20 2
01-4210-0.20-20 ?
01-4210-070-70
01-4330-440-20 C
01-4330-490-50 C
01-4425-310-50
01-4425-310-70
15-4425-310-60
01-4330-440-"1 1
3*J4 COAST TO COAST KEYS 01-4305-050-50 3
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT- .. -
.---._---..-,VENDOR .•- - -..- _..-.
ITEM
DESCRIPTIQN
ACCOUNT. N0. INV
5.04
COAST TO COAST
MISC
PARTS
01-4305-050-50
8.08
--DA-HLGRION- HOUARD
ASSO
JUL TA EXT
01-4220-135-80
7405
CONTEL CREDIT CORP
AAUG
PYMT V
- 01-4210-020-2d,
118.65
CONTEL CREDIT CORP
AUG
PYMT
01-4210-110-10,
59.32 -- ---•
.-GONTEL.-CREDIT CORP
AUG PYMT
05-4210-105-15
252.1 2 *i
26.73
DAVIS ELECTRONIC
SVC
RPRS/PARTS
2.85 COPY EQUIP CO
2,85
XEROX VELLUMM 05-4300-105-15
160000
DAHLGRETN HOWARD
ASSO
JUL RE LINVILLE
01-4220-135-80
250.00
OAHLGR8N HOWARD
ASSO
JUL RE JOHNSON EROS
01-4220-135-80
5400
--DA-HLGRION- HOUARD
ASSO
JUL TA EXT
01-4220-135-80
1 9183.00
DAHLGREN HOWARD
ASSO
JUL SVC
01-4221-135-80
75,00
DAHLGREN HOWARD
ASSO
JUL RE GOULD AIR SP
16-4220-135-00
26.73
DAVIS ELECTRONIC
SVC
RPRS/PARTS
01-4330-450-30 ;
28.42
DAVIS ELECTRONIC
SVC
RPR/PARTS
01-4330-450-30
24.Q5----------._DkVI-S--�L€-C-TR0NIC
SVC
RPRS/PARTS
01-4330-450-30 ;
27.59
DAVIS ELECTRONIC
SVC
RPRS/PARTS
01-4330-450-30
31.78
DAVIS ELECTRONIC
SVC
RPRS/PARTS
01-4330-450-30 ;
24-,38 -- ---------DAVIS-ELECTRONIC
-SVC
•RPRS/PARTS
01-4330-450-30 ;
25.00
DAVIS ELECTRONIC
SVC
PARTS
01-4330-450-30
20.70
DAVIS ELECTRONIC
SVC
RPR ONLY
01-4330-450-30 ;
24.9.5----------DA-VIS--ELECTRONIC
SVC-----..-
RPRS/PARTS _-
01-4,33.0-450-30 ;
232,90 *,-"
7.54 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY STEEL CYL
127.69 ICMA RG 8/17 BJH
61,30 IC MA RG 8/1 7 PR
1-88.9 9-. *i
250.00 IDS LIFE INS CO AUG PREM
250.00
01-4330-460-30 1
01-2072-000-00
01-4406-110-10
01-2072-000-00 1
3.08 KNUTH TOM MI THRU 8/15 01-4415-040-40
1508 KNUTH TOM MI THRU 8/15 05-4415-105-15
MOUNT
VIE N D OR
CHECK REGISTER
-ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
9.24
KNUTH TOM
M3
THRU
8/15
67-4415-941-
36.96
_KNUTH TOM
MI
THRU
8//15
87•.4415-812-,
2020
KNUTH TOM
MI
THRU
8/15
90-4415-815-00
6.60
KNUTH TOM
MMI
THRU
8/15
90-4415-816-00
73.26
5.06
KULLANDER
GUY
MI
THRU
8/13
01-4415-040-40
6.60
KULLANDER
GUY
MI
THRU
8/13
01-4415-050-50
8.14
....KULLANDER
GUY
MI
THRU
8/13
01-4415-080-80
12.54
KULLANDER
GUY
MI
THRU
8/13
01-4415-110-10
31.25
KULLANDER
GUY
SPLYS
NL
05-4268-650-15
16*06--
KULLANDER
GUY
MI
THRU
8/13
05-4415-105-15
13.42
KULLANDER
GUY
MMI
THRU8/13
05-4415-650-15
.88
KULLANDER
GUY
MT
THRU
8/13
16-4415-850-00
1.76 - _-. ___ KULLANDER
GUY, _.
_.MI
THRU
8/13
74-4415-813-00
.
32.58
KULLANDER
GUY
MI
THRU
8/13
87-4415-812-00
128.29
4.50- ....__
__.LANGULA'_ HDJE _
JUL
DISC
01-4305-030-30
7.52
LANGULA HDWE
BULB
01-4305-030-30
1i
42.74
LANGULA HDWE
SHOVELS
01-4305-030-30
14
44.98
LANGULA HDWE
SHOVELS
01-4305-030-7"
3;
90.74 *r
821.25
LOGIS
JUL
DVC
01-4214-110-10
0'
71.15.---._.______.L.OGIS
_..
_
JUL
SVC
05-4214-105-15
0'
12.95
LOGIS
JUL
SVC
10-4214-000-00
0
323.35
LOGIS
JUL
SVC
15-4214-060-60
0
51 . 7-2- OGIS_.__
_ _
JUL
SVC_
16-4214-000-00
0'
12.95
LOGIS
JUL
SVC
21-4214-000-00
0'
19293.37 *�
18.00_. ..
__ .MEND HGTS
RUBBISH
JULSVC
01-4280-310-50
3
18.00
MEND HGTS
RUBBISH
JUL
SVC
01-4280-310-70
3
15.00
MEND HGTS
RUBBISH
JUL
SVC
01-4280-315-30
2
13.00
MEND HGTS
RUBBISH
JULSVC
15-4280-310-60
3
69,00 */
23.25
MIDWEST"SIREN SERV
AUG
CONTR
01-4330-450-20
1
62.40
MIDWEST SIREN SERV
AUG
CONTR
07-4330-000-00
1
85.65
41.50
MILAN FIRE
INC
DRY
CHEM
01-4305- 030-30
3
387.87
150,00.. - ----MINNI TEAMSTER-LOC320 AUG U0
1 50.00 *�
307.45
CHECK
REGISTER
POWER
AMOUNTVENDOR
-
ITEM -DESCRIPTION -
- -ACCOUNT N0, IN1
17,00 MINN FIRE
INC
DRY CHEM
01-4305-030-30
72,00 --MINN--FIRE
INC.
BADGES
01-4490-030-30
257,37 MINN FIRE
INC
BADGES
01-4490-030-30
387.87
150,00.. - ----MINNI TEAMSTER-LOC320 AUG U0
1 50.00 *�
307.45
NORTHERN
ST
POWER
CO
99,15
NORTHERN -ST
POWER
CO
99,16
NORlrHERN
ST
POWER
CO
59,59
NORTHERN
ST
POWER
CO
23,49--..--__-.-. NORTUERN
S,T
P4WER _
CO - --
136,47
NOR'rHERN
ST
POWER
CO
20,34
NORlrHEFM
ST
POWER
CO
20.34
NORTHERN
ST
POWER
CO
69,13
NORTHERN
ST
POWER
CO
39.73
NORTHERN
ST
POWER
CO
- 99,,15-
POWER -CO
205,35
NORTHERN
ST
POWER
CO
20,34
NORTHERN
ST
POWER
CO
11199.69 */
237,09
NORTHWQSTERN
BELL
27,93
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
-.63,56..- -- -----
NORTHWE-.STP---RN
BELL
327,08
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
23,16
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
- $4,5.1'-_------------NORTHWESTERN_BELL
• - -
3.04,68
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
1906807 *i
567,75-- -- -- _. OSAIALD FIRE HOSE-
567.75
OSE.567,75 *�
-3.90 OXYGEN SERVICE CO
3.90
19087,58 PIPJE BEND PAVING INC
477.32 -MINE--REND PAVING INC
19564.90 */
AUG SVC
AUG SVC
AUG SVC
AUG SVC
AUG -SVC
AUGSVC
AUGS VC
AUG SVC
AUG SVC
AUG SVC
AUG SVC
AUGSVC
AUG SVC
AUGSVC
AUG SVC
AUG SVC
AUGSVC
AUGSVC
AUG SVC
AUG SVC
01-2075-000-00
01-4211-300-50
01-4211-310-50
01-4211-310-70
01-4211-315-30
01-4211-320-70
01-4211-420-50
01-4212-310-50
01-4212-310-70
01-4212-315-30
01-4212-320-70
15-4211_-310-60
15-4211-400-60
15-4212-310-60
01-4210-020-20
01-4210-050-50
01-4210-070-70
01-4210-110-10
01-4210-315-30
05-4210-105-1-5.
15-4 210-060-60
- HOSE -COUP L/CLAMPS 12-4630-000-00
- . DEMURRAGE THRU 7/15
WEAR MMIX
FINE MIX
01 -43a5 -m-50
01-4422-050-50
01-4422-050-50
6.19 S&'f OFFICE PROD LABELS 05-4300-105-15
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT __. ____. 111__1____ VENDOR
8.27 S&T OFFICE PROD
14.46
34.65 TSIGNAL CAR WASH
50*00 SIGNAL CAR BASH
84.65
38.31 SOUTHVIEW CHEVROLET
38.31 */
_ ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT_IMOs I'ti
PENCIL 05-4300-1,, 11
- . 11...25_ _ _ . - .._SO11T-HVIEW GARDEN CTR
11 *25 */
1 9839.51
1 9260.7-3
511.69
17.26
44,14-
166,60
4.14-166.60
92.22
134.66_
166.60-
166.60
186,23-
55;42
4,308.46 *J
24,544.69•
567.67
62.40
12.95
567.75 .
49854.25
107,p572.60
12.95 -
9*24
1.76
119.54
8180
ST TREAS PERA
-ST-..TREAS PERA-. _
ST TREAS PERA
ST TREAS PERA
-
--ST-Ta EAS PERA..
ST TREAS PERA
ST TREAS PERA
ST_ TREAS..R E RA
ST TREAS PERA
ST TREAS PERA
-ST-TREAS PERA
ST TREAS PERA
FUND
01
TOTAL
-- FUND
05
TOTAL
FUND
07
TOTAL
FUND
10
TOTAL
1111 _-F.UND_.1.2
01-4406-01, ',0
TOTAL. --
FUND
15
TOTAL
FUND
16
TOTAL
- FUND
21
TOTAL
FUND
67
TOTAL
FUND
74
TOTAL
-__.FUND..B7
TOTAL
FUND
90
TOTAL
136,334.60 - TOTAL
JUL MASHES
3RD 11TR WASHES
01-4430-020-2C
01-4430-020-2C
PARTS
01-4330-490-50
SOD
01-4305-050-50
8/3PAYROLL
01-2062-000-00
8/3PAYROLL
01-4406-1Q,20-20
8/3PAYROLL
01-4406-021-20
8/3PAYROLL
01-4406-030-30
8/3PAYROLL _
01-4406-01, ',0
8/3PAYROLL
01-4406-05_ jO
8/3PAYROLL
01-4406-070-70
8/3PAYROLL
01-4406-x.10-10
CORR ACCT
01-4407-050-50
8/3PAYROLL
01-4407-050-50
8/3PAYROLL
05-4406-..105-15
8/3PAYROLL
15-4406-060-60
GENERAL FUND
ENGR ENTERPRISE _. .
CIVIL DEFENSE
SPECIAL PARK FUND
EQUIPMENT_ CERTIFICATES
SEXIER UTILITY
TID 179-7/81-4/82-2/82-6
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT W
I80-3 TH13 REALIGN/WATER
CONS PROD FUND
I83 -4/83-4B GRYC/DAK CTY _
I83-78 MH RD MN DOT
MANUAL
CHECKS'-______—___.__......__
_ _. _
10572
2,425.03
St Treas SS
8/3 FICA
10573
4,445:8'6-
Dir Internal Revenue
8/3 FIT
10574
350.00
DC Bank
Payroll Deductions 8/3
10575
965.1.5
SCCU
If
10576
221269 -.'Si -8-
' City -M.-H. payroll" Acct
' 8/3 - Payroll -- -
10577
1,237.50
DCR CORP
Balance August Rent
31,.693.52
GT
170,028.12
, pv
LIST OF:..:1984"CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON AUGUST 21, 1984
Attracta Sign, Inc.
'John Beissel, Inc.
General Masonry and Concrete,
Hardy Brothers Construction
Kurth Construction, Inc.
Marich Construction Company
W. V. Nelson Construction
Northern Sun Construction
Equipment Company
U utbu .,Heating Company
r' •
.; SuburbanNHeating Company
R4,chgels-,Brothe rs Construction
Sign Erecting License
General Contractor's License
Inc. Masonry License
General Contractor's License
General Contractor's License
General Contractor's License
Masonry License
General Contractor's License
Excavating License
Gas Piping License
Heating and Air Conditioning
General Contractor's License
LIST OF 1984/85 CLUB ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
Mendakota Country Club
Somerset Country Club
License
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Condon Cul -de -Sac
INTRODUCTION
August 16, 1984
A inistrator
Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Condon, 2535 Dodd Road attended the August 7th City
Council meeting to complain that they had been flooded twice during recent
rain storms by water coming off the nearby highway construction. The Condons
had been in contact with the contractor involved and Mn/DOT officials but
were concerned that not enough emphasis was being given by Mn/DOT to solve
either the existing problem or addressing the potential for future'problems
in the final road design.
Staff was ordered to meet with Mn/DOT and the contractor to help the
Condons.
TAT G rTTG G T ON
Staff met with Charles Graff of Mn/DOT and Dave Prusak of Johnson Brothers
Contractors at the Condon residence on August 9th to review the problem. It
appeared to staff at the time that the existing grading around the Condon
residence is such that it makes the home very vulnerable to flooding. The
removing of the vegitation in the area has increased both rate and volume of
runoff going toward the home compounding the problem. Staff feels that
Johnson Brothers has presently taken all prudent measures to help direct the
runoff away from the home. The only real solution to the problem is to get
the Cul -de -Sac construction completed as soon as possible. Dave Prusak
stated that he would schedule the Condon Cul -de -Sac construction as soon as
possible and believes he can get started on it the week of August 19th.
As far as the concern about the design of the road, Mft/DOT lowered the
Cul -de -Sac at the storm water inlet by 0.8 of a foot. Staff feels that with
that extra depth and some careful grading behind the curb, the Cul -de -Sac
design will be adequate to protect the Condon residence from street drainage.
ACTION REQUIRED
This memo is for information only. No action is required.
a
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 13, 1984
TO: Mayor, City Council, and CitxpLstrator
FROM: James E. -Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Quehl Drainage Complaint
INTRODUCTION:
Mr. Quehl, 1968 South Lane attended the July 17, 1984 City Council
meeting to register a complaint about the lack of drainage in the ditch line
along South Lane. As a result of this complaint Staff was directed to study
the problem.
DISCUSSION:
Staff surveyed a profile of the ditch line and determined that there
is slope in the ditch (approximately 9' in 900' or 1%, which is minimum
design). While completing the survey, Staff noticed that most of"the
drainage problem is created by a drain tile outlet located at the north end
of the ditch. John Perron, 1940 South Lane who noticed the surveyors called
City Hall to determine what was going on. He stated in his call that the
drain tile always runs (even when nearby Warrior Pond is dry), so he sus-
pects the tile is to divert a spring. He further stated that if the other
neighbors completed some minor ditch maintenance such*,as he does they could
eliminate or at least minimize their problem with the running water.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Install a storm water system in the area and assess the costs.
2. Do a minor amount of filling or grading in the depression along the -
flow line. This work would not be a total solution and would require
periodic maintenance by either the City or landowners involved.
3. Plug the drain outlet. This alternative would have to be done with
the affected neighbor's permission and could cause the water to
reappear at a different location.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that alternate Number 2 be followed. This ditch line
work could be done by City Staff initially but it should be recoggized that
the problem is of a nature that will require periodic maintenance by the home-
owner to keep the water flowing.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Review the alternatives and direct Staff to proceed on implementing the
one selected.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 10, 1984
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Ad�nCsVatr
FROM: Edward F. Kishel
City Engineer
SUBJECT: Surface Water Runoff, Cherry Hill 2nd Addition
INTRODUCTION:
Recently, Mr. Adolphus Gaddy, 1387 Farmdale Road, and Mr. David Trudeau,
1385 Farmdale Road, appeared before the Council with a problem regarding
surface water runoff in their neighborhood. It seems that in periods of
heavy rain or snow melt, two natural low areas on the Wachtler farm south of
Cherry Hill 2nd Addition overflow causing surface water to run through the
rear yards along Farmdale and collect in Mr. Gaddy's yard. The attached
drawing depicts what Staff considers to be the problem.
DISCUSSION:
A visit to the site reveals that the low areas have been in existance
for many years with no man-made changes. Farmdale Road and adjacent prop-
erties slope to the north at a 3 or 4 percent grade allowing for adequate
surface water runoff. Individual property owners usually grade and sod to
allow an adequate swale and fall to keep surface water away from the dwelling.
It is staff's opinion that Mr. Gaddy did not do so. Thus, during excessive
runoff, surface water does accumulate at the southeast corner of Mr. Gaddy's
house where the sod is approximately flush with the tops of basement window
areaways.
In the process of flowing from the Wachtler farm, surface water passes
through two rear yards along Farmdale Road that appear to have adequate
drainage control. This water flows to the lot line between the Trudeau and
Gaddy properties where a low wood wall was installed on the lot line in an
effort to divert the water westward to Farndale Road. It does not appear
to be completely successful because of a lack of adequate slope on the Gaddy
property towards Farmdale Road.
ALTERNATIVES:
Two alternatives appear to be possible. One will involve the City
Public Works Department, and the other will involve private property
owners. Staff does not consider a public improvement project necessary or
possible.
1. As shown on the drawing, a small low area along Wachtler Avenue
collects water from Cherry Hills 1st Addition through a culvert
under Wachtler Avenue. Overflow water runs westward with some
of it being diverted to the cul-de-sac at the end of Cherry Hill
Road, and the balance continuing to the rear lots along Farmdale.
A 50 foot shallow ditch can be constructed along the line between
lots 5 and 6 of Block 3 diverting some or all of the water from
Wachtler Avenue. Lot 6 is vacant but a construction easement may
be needed and surface water will run along the curb surface to a
storm sewer at the intersection of Farmdale and Cherry Hill Road.
2. The other alternative is for Mr. Gaddy to regrade his yard to provide
a positive swale to direct surface water from the rear yard toward
Farmdale and also toward the northerly neighboring property where
an adequate slope exists.
It is Staff's opinion that the Gaddy property does not allow for positive
drainage away from the house, is too low at the basement windows and a down
spout from the roof drain spilling in to the wet area adds to the problem.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Council give consideration to constructing a
ditch along the line between Lots 5 and 6 of Block 3 but only after Staff has
had an opportunity to inform property owners along Cherry Hill Road of the
possibility of increased surface water flow along the west gutter to Farmdale
Road, and has received their comments.
Staff also recommends that the Council inform Mr. Trudeau and Mr. Gaddy
that the City cannot become involved in expending public funds to improve
private property and to suggest to Mr. Gaddy that he take steps to regrade
his yard by removing the sod and developing a positive swale to keep water
away from the house and from ponding in the rear yard. He should also be
informed that it is advisable to revise the roof drain to slope to the north
where a downspout can direct water northward to where existing drainage now
flows.
ACTION REQUIRED:
1. If the Council concurs with Staff's recommendation for a ditch between
Lots 5 and 6 of Block 3, it should direct Staff to advise the property
owners along Cherry Hill Road of the consequences, namely, possible
water flow in the street gutters for lengthy periods of time.
2. If Council continues to see the need for a ditch, it should direct
Staff to obtain necessary construction easements and to assist Public
Works in installing some. Cherry Hill 2nd Addition plat does provide
for a 10 foot drainage easement on the side of each platted lot. An
additional -temporary easement may be needed.
3. Council should advise Mr. Gaddy that to eliminate ponding, he should
regrade his yard and change the rear roof drainage, as suggested.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 7, 1984
T0: Mayor and City Council,
FROM: Kevin D. Frazee/
City Administ ator
SUBJECT: Curley's Addition Park Property
INTRODUCTION
During April, the issue of the development of Lot 10 in Curley's Addition
was raised. Briefly, Council ordered construction of a bike trail through the
property and sale of the balance. Subsequently, area residents took issue with
this project, indicating that they had been promised a developed park on the lot.
Council ordered staff to research minutes and records of the purchase of the
property.
HISTORY
The issue of Lot 10 first came to Council attention when it was raised by
Mr. Vince Anderson, 1062 Cullen Avenue, during the public comments section at the
April 3rd meeting.
Attached is the responding staff report submitted at the April 17th meeting.
The staff proposed to construct the bike trail connecting to the I -35E bike
trail, and sell the balance of the property. The plan was discussed at a joint
meeting of the Council and Parks Commission on April 10th. On April 17th,
Council officially authorized the project and sale of the lot.
Subsequently, Mrs. Ann Maple, 2166 Timmy Street, the property owner abutting
the proposed bike trail, called to express opposition to the plan. She suggested
an alignment up the center of the lot, and that the lot not be sold. In re-
sponse, the Council (at the meeting of May 1st) ordered staff to design alterna-
tives, and to seek input from the Parks Commission.
On May 8th, staff and affected residents met with the Parks Commission.
Staff presented two plans (attached with the memo to Council dated May 9, 1984),
one (labeled "Staff plan") which places the bike trail to one side of the lot,
and the second (labeled "Neighborhood plan") which places the trail up the mid-
dle, and therefore would preclude sale for a single family home. The Parks
Commission felt very strongly that the lot was not intended, nor was it adequate,
for development as a park. Therefore, they recommended that the "Staff plan" be
followed.
-2 -
The staff and Park Commission recommendations were presented to the Council
at the meeting of May 15th. Several neighborhood residents, including Mr. Eric
Mattson, 2102 Timmy Street, attended that meeting to protest the plan for sale of
the lot. Mr. Mattson presented a neighborhood petition and minutes from the Park
Commission meetings in 1975 concerning the purchase of this property by the City.
According to Mr. Mattson, the property was purchased with funds restricted for
park purposes, and committments were made by the Park Commission, that when I -35E
was completed, the property would be developed. Council voted to table the
matter until June 19, so that staff could research the City records.
The follow-up report to Council has been delayed due to an inability of the
residents to meet with staff until a couple of weeks ago.
PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY
The property, Lot 10, was purchased by the City in the late summer of 1975.
Although the records of that time are not as complete as we would like, it
appears that Mr. Mattson's assertions are not without merit.
The property was purchased for $10,000, with money in the park improvement
fund. It appears that the funds used were interest earned on the proceeds of the
1971 Park Bond issue. Therefore, the lot could now be sold, but proceeds from
sale of the property would be restricted to park acquisition and development
purposes.
Attached are copies of Park Commission minutes of May 28, 1975, and City
Council minutes of July 1, 1975, authorizing purchase of the property. Both make
reference to the property providing access to Rogers Lake and open space and a
playground area.
The minutes also reference the authorization for purchase of a portion of
Outlot A from Thomas Curley, which is a 700 foot by 100 foot strip south of the
homes on Cullen. This parcel is contiguous to Lot 10, and would have had public
access through it. For some undetermined reason, that parcel was never pur-
chased.
LATEST MEETING WITH NEIGHBORS
Jim Danielson and I met with neighborhood representatives on August 2nd.
They indicated that they would like:
1. Bike path connected through the center of the lot.
2. Fences on the perimeter of the lot.
3. Grading to provide a small play and picnic area.
4. Two or three picnic tables and benches.
5. Trash cans.
-3-
6. Security light.
7. "No Dumping" and "No Motorized Vehicles" signs.
8.,, Regular City maintenance.
CURRENT ISSUES
1. The Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1979, indicates that,as a standard,
--_the City should attempt to have a park facility within 3/8's of a mile of each
�x.esidence. An estimated 1/4 to 1/3 of Curley's Addition is within that distance
s ' • from Rogers Lake Park.
2. Lot 10 is approximately 1/2 acre in size. The Comprehensive Plan
indicates that neighborhood parks should be five to ten acres in size, and that
smaller parks of two or less acres can be valuable in heavily populated areas of
the City. However, the Plan also indicates that the number of these smaller
parks should be very limited, since their main value is ornamental, and the
maintenance cost is relatively high.
3. Based on the 1975 minutes of the Council and Park Commission meetings,
it does appear to have been acknowledged that Lot 10 would provide open space, as
well as bikeway access. Orvil Johnson, previous City Administrator, believes
is that the intent was to provide a passive open space, but does not recall any
committment for park development.
4. The Parks Commission, at its meeting of August 7th, reiterated its
position that Rogers Lake should serve as the park for this neighborhood, and
that City funds should not be used for either development or maintenance of this
undersized park.
5. City Attorney Tom Hart is of the opinion that, since the property has
never been officially designated for park purposes, nor used and maintained for
such purposes, the City has no legal obligation to develop a park there at this
time.
ALTERNATIVES
There would appear to be at least three feasible alternatives:
1. Proceed with the earlier plan to build the bike trail along the north-
easterly property line, then sell the balance.
2. Develop the bike trail up the middle of the property, leaving the
balance as natural (i.e., unmaintained) open space.
3. Develop a small "vest pocket" park as requested by the neighbors.
- 4 -
RECOMMENDATIONS
As noted, the Parks Commission continues to recommend that the City proceed
with the original plan to develop the bike trail and sell the remainder of the
lot.
Staff would normally also recommend against development, both on the merits
of this particular situation, and as a precedent for other "vest pocket" parks.
However, we are also sympathetic to the neighborhood's assertion that they were
promised some type of space here. Therefore, it becomes a question of balancing
the fact that this park would not meet City standards, against the earlier
committments.
ACTION REQUIRED
To consider the information provided, along with any citizen testimony, then
decide with which course of action to proceed.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
April 13, 1984
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
- !,f ROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
xSJU$JECT: Lot 10, Curley's Addition - Bike Trail
BACKGROUND:
At staff's request Mn/DOT constructed a bituminous bike trail from
Wagon Wheel Trail to Lot 10, Curley's Addition in connection with the
I -35E construction. Lot 10 was purchase by the City in 1975 to provide
a corridor for access to Rogers Lake Park for the residents in Curley's
Addition. THat lot has been a source of maintenance headaches for the
City over the years.
nTCr11CCTnN -
Several Curley's Addition residents attended the April 3rd City
Council meeting and requested the City complete the Mn/DOT trail con-
struction through Lot 10. Staff studied the alternatives and presented
them at the joint Council/Park & Recreation meeting on April 10th.
There seemed to be a concensus at that meeting to complete the trail by
following an alignment along thecast and north boudaries of Lot 10. The
City would then se4l the remainder of the lot as a new home site. This
sale will do several things:
1. Provide the funds for the trail construction.
2. Reduce the future maintenance responsibility of the City.
(A new homeowner would have a manicured lawn matching the
neighbors)
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend Council authorize staff to prepare the documents for con-
structing the trail, splitting the trail right-of-way from the lot, filing
the lot split documents with Dakota County and offering the homesite for
sale through a realestate agent.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council wishes to implement staff's recommendation they should pass
a motion adopting Resolution No. 84- Resolution Authorizing Trail Con-
struction and Sale of City Property.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
May 9, 1984
TO: Mayor, City Council and City inistrator
Tr, FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
aS,UBJECT: Curley's Addition - Bike Trail
Job No. 8418
DISCUSSION•
The concerned Curley Addition residents met with the Park and Recreation
Commission at their regularly scheddled May 8, 1984 meeting. I attended
the meeting and presented a "neighborhood plan" that was prepared by City
Staff and the previously approved "City Staff Plan".
The Park and Recreation Commission felt very strongly that this lot
was not intended to be a park facility and they were not willing to expend
park funds for its upgrading or maintenance. The Park and Recreation
Commission therefore continue to recommend to the City Council the City
Staff Plan which allows for recovery of construction costs by sale of the
lot.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff agrees with the Park and Recreation Commission and continues
to recommend Council, follow the previously adopted plan. Staff
would agree that certain conditions be put on the sale of the lot. to insure
a home compatible with the rest of the neighborhood be constructed on it.
0
CITY STAFF PLAN
8418
May 4, 1984
1.
80
L. F.
18" RCP
@
25
= $2,000
2.
2
EA
18" Aprons
@
250
= 500
3.
1
EA
Catch Basis
@
800
= 800
4.
27)
L.F.
8 Ft. Bituminous
@
6
= 1,620
Path
5.
1
Lump
Sum Site Grading
@
1,000
= 1,000
6.
2,500
S.Y.
Seed & Mulch
@
0.30
750
7.
200
C.Y.
Topsoil Borrow
@
6.00
= 1,200
8.
20
EA
4 ft. spruce or
@50.00
1,000
whatever
9.
130
S.Y.
Sod
@
1.00
= 130
$9,000
+ 407 Eng. Cont.
3,600
$12,600
NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN
+ 40% Eng. Cont.
8418
May 4, 1984
= 4,800
240
= 1,600
a 1,560
900
$9,100
3,640
$12,740
240
LF
18" RCP
@ 20
1
EA
18" Apron
@240
•' "';.�`3�
2
EA
4' Dia. Manhole
@800
260
LF
8' Bit. Path
@ 6
° r —5.
150
LF
Fence
@ 6
+ 40% Eng. Cont.
8418
May 4, 1984
= 4,800
240
= 1,600
a 1,560
900
$9,100
3,640
$12,740
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Park and Recreation Commission
MINUTES
May 28, 1975
Present
Absent
Shipman
Murphy Lundeen
Witt
Franzmeier Finn
Mills
Johnson
Howe
Selander
1. Minutes of April 30, 1975 meeting approved.
2. Report on Municipal Facilities. Johnson reported that at the
May 13 Council meeting the need for a municipal building was
discussed. This would include a Public Works garage,
administration offices and perhaps a water storage tank.
3. Summer Recreation
-- Selander reported that summer staff is set, and women's
softball has been organized.
-- Motion was made by Witt that due to lack of interest, no
swimming lessons be offered at Rogers Lake this summer.
Seconded by Murphy. Passed.
-- Increase of beach size at Rogers Lake would be on an
"as needed" basis.
-- Signs will be posted at Tennis Courts indicating times of
tennis lessons.
-- Franzmeier to look into cost of backboards for tennis courts.
4. Park -A -Rama. Witt reported on progress made and showed the tentative
schedule of events and brochure. Next Park -A -Rama meeting - June 12.
5. Filling of Pond -- East side of Rogers Lake Road.
-- Discussion, with residents on some problems with noise after hours
on beach and parking lot. Action: Signs posting hours, and more
Police enforcement.
-- Area resident agreed to filling of pond to widen road into park.
6. Curley Addition. Johnson reviewed discussion with Allen and Curley
regarding sites in the area. A motion was made by Murphy to buy
Lot 10 (Allen's) and a portion or, if necessary, all of the 100 foot
by 700 foot unplatted area belonging to Curley. Seconded by Witt.
Passed.- This area would provide open space and a playground for
residents as well as Provide for access to Rogers Lake.
.July .1, 3.)75
CASE
CA` E NO. 75-15, '11ie Council discussed the application from the Country Club
COUIq'I,RY C1AJB Market to install signs on the fa�;ade of the Mendota Plaza
It was noted that the Planning Commission had recouunended
approval of the allocation of 320 square feet of sign space on
the north side of the building and a sign of 60 square feet on
the west side. Several members of the Council expressed
questions and concerns, particularly since a sign layout has
not been submitted and representatives of the Country Club
Market were not present at the meeting to answer the questions.
As a result of the discussion, the Council appointed
Councilmen Losleben and Wahl to serve as a committee to meet
with Country Club representatives. The matter was tabled
to July 15 pending a report from Councilmen Losleben and tahl.
V PARK AND RECREATION The Council acknowledged receipt of a memo from Park and
COMIMISSION Recreation Commission Chairman Kevin'Howe regarding proposed
acquisition of property in the Curley Valley View area and'
adjacent to Ivy Falls Park, and proposed construction of two
additional double tennis courts. Administrator Johnson
stated that at the June 25 Park Commission meeting the
Commission spent a considerable amount of time discussing the
necessity for acquiring property to provide an access way
between Curley's Valley View Addition and Rogers Lake Park.
The Commission recommended the acquisition of Lot 10, Curley's
Valley View Addition from Richard Allen for approximately
$10,000 and a portion of Outlot A from Thomas Curley for a
purchase price of $6,500 or less. This would allow access
from the Curley Valley View area to Rogers Lake Park as well
as provider. o en space for informal recreational activities
or area residents.
After a brief discussion, Councilman Losleben moved that the
staff be directed to proceed with negotiations for the purchase
of Lot 10 and a portion of Outlot A.
Councilman Lockwood seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Administrator Johnson stated that the Park Commission has
also held a considerable amount of discussion on the purchase
of the McGough property for expansion of the Ivy Falls Park
and on the possible construction of double tennis courts at
the Ivy Falls Park and the Rogers Lake Park. He stated that
he has been in contact with Mr. Jerry McGough regarding
acquisition of property, consisting of approximately four lots,
adjacent to the park. He further stated that Mr. McGough's
current asking price for the property is $35,000 and that at
the June 25 Park Commission meetingiseveral residents from the
Ivy Falls area indicated that they would raise money to
contribute toward the purchase of the property. Mr. William
Paper, 1126 Sylvandale Road, informed the Council that $7,000
has been collected for this purpose. He stated that neighborhoo,
representatives will be present at the July 15 meeting.
Mayor Huber pointed out that Mr. McGough will be expected to
contribute a park donation upon approval of his final plat.
tie further stated that Rr. t•fcC,ough must be informed 0.at
a 1•...-k &;nation will be zeaui r._d.
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
nT C rTTC C T OM
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 17, 1984
mayor, City Council, & City Adm' t?t o
James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
Feasibility Report
Utility Service for Ivy Hill 2nd Addition
Job 8421
Improvement 84, Project No. 3
At the August 7th, 1984 City Council meeting, the Council approved
the final 4 units for the Ivy Hill PUD. These units were approved to
be placed on Lot H. This lot previously was not scheduled for development,
therefore, did not have Sanitary Sewer and Water lines available.
City ordinance requires that each unit within the City have its own
individual sewer and water service leads extending to a City main,
therefore, City mains need to be brought in to serve the site. The
developer, Clapp-Thomssen, has signed a Developers Agreement (Attachment
A) and a petition for sanitary sewer and water improvements and waiver
of hearing, (Attachment B).
Because a feasibility report addressing this development is not very
complicated and because the developer needs utility services available
as soon as possible Staff has prepared this report in advance of.Council
authorization.
The layout of the proposed work appears on Attachment C and the
costs are as follows:
SANITARY SEWER
A new sanitary sewer main can be extended from Ivy Hill Drive and is
estimated to cost $15,000.
WATER SERVICES
One inch water services can be extended from -Butler Avenue to serve
these units and costs for these•services are estimated at $7000.
STORM SEWER
There needs to be a catch basin installed in the new driveway for
the units and because that catch basin will be in a public easement,
and because all other similar catch basins throughout the PUD are
publicly owned, Staff has included this one as being public also. Costs
for that catch basin and lead are estimated at $4,550.
All assessments are to be split equally between the four units and
are estimated to be $6,640 per unit. Assessments can be paid up in full
within 30 days after formal notice, otherwise they will be certified to
the County Auditor and the amounts spread on the tax rolls over 19 years
for sanitary sewer & water main and 10 years for storm sewer.
RECOMMENDATION
This project is feasible and it is recommended that Council authorize
the feasibility report, accept the feasibility report, and order the Engineer
to prepare plans and specificaitons.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council desires to implement the Staff recommendation, it should
pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 84-_, Accepting Petition and Ordering
Preparation of Feasibility Report for Sanitary Sewers, Water, and Storm
Sewers to serve Lot H, Clapp Thomssen, Ivy Hill 2nd Addition, and a
motion adopting Resolution No. 84-_, Accepting Engineer's Report,
Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications
for Sanitary Sewers, Water and Storm, Sewers Construction to Serve Lot H,
Clapp-Thomssen, Ivy Hill 2nd Addition (Improvement No. 84, Project No. 3).
:'w
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT CONCERNING
LOT H, IVY HILL TOWNHOMES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
SECTION 13, T28N, R23W
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
This agreement, made and entered into this day of -
1984, by and between the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minn sota',
(hereinafter called the "City") and Clapp-Thomssen Company, 4 East Fourth Street,
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101, (hereinafter called the "Developer").
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, Developer proposes a plat for single family dwellings in Mendota
Heights to be known as Clapp-Thomssen Ivy Hill 2nd consisting of four lots on
approximately 1.67 acres located in the Southwest Quadrant of the intersection of
Butler Avenue and Ivy Hill Drive presently known as Lot H, Ivy Hill Townhouses;
and
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the two parties as
follows:
1. Grading and Landscaping
Developer agrees to grade and landscape the platted area in accordance with
the Grading Plan and Landscaping plan as approved by City Council and dated July
6, 1984. (Plans attached hereto). In the grading and landscaping of the area,
measures shall be taken to prevent any deleterious results on adjacent property.
Topsoil shall be placed on all disturbed areas upon completion of grading.
Seeding or sodding shall be accomplished to establish a cover of vegetation as
soon as possible after grading.
The Developer and his agents shall use extreme care during the grading
process (which includes proper timing of restoration, seeding and erosion con-
trol) to protect and maintain existing:
a. Private land characteristics;
b. Public land characteristics;
c. Public investments such as sewer, watermains, and street surfacing
facilities.
Any deterioration of adjacent property or streets due to erosion or con-
struction traffic shall be corrected immediately upon direction from the Public
Works Director.
2. Platting and Utilities
Developer will proceed with final platting as soon as possible, utility
easements as indicated on the grading and drainage plan will be incorporated in
the final plat. Surface water handling and driveway construction on the site
will be the developer's responsibility to include; design, construction and
maintenance.
(ATTACHMENT A)
It is recognized that these new lots do not have City.Sanitary Sewer and
Watermain available to serve them consequently, the City will proceed immediately
to take the necessary action to have sanitary sewer and watermains with service
leads installed for the development. After connecting these new utility mains
into Ivy Hill Drive, the City will only repair the street cut and curb with a
temporary patch, the Developer will complete final road repair at the time of his
driveway construction. Costs for this utility work is estimated at $6500 per
unit and all costs will be assessed against the four new lots.
3. Park Contribution
A park contribution for this project has been calculated at $600.00 and
payment is due at the time of final platting.
CLAPP-THOMSSEN COMPANY
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
Kevin D. Frazell, City Administrator
2
PETITION FOR SANITARY, STORM SEWER, WATER,
IMPROVEMENTS AND WAIVER OF HEARING
The undersigned, being the owner of the following described pro-
perty situated in the City of Mendota Heights, in the County of Dakota
and State of Minnesota, to -wit:
Clapp-Thomssen Ivy Hill 2nd
Pursuant to the provisions of M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the undersigned
hereby petitions the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights to
construct and extend said City's Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, and Water
Systems so as to directly serve the above described property and to
assess the entire cost of said improvements (including the cost of any
land or easement acquisition incurred by reason thereof) against said
property. The undersigned hereby further specifically waives the re-
quirement of any hearing and said improvements and assessments there-
fore and further waives the requirement of publication and mailed
notice of or with respect to any such hearing or hearings.
The undersigned further agrees to donate to the City of Mendota
Heights any easements over the above described property required for
said project.
Dated: 4q6, a, 1964-
Clapp -Th en Company
By
Its
1 ( ATTACHMENT B)
., - ... 4.1'.
0
WATS RE
W, w
Avg.'
11
It 11
#4
(ATTACHMENT C)
100,
le -
.41 X
T
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR SANITARY SEWERS, WATER, AND STORM SEWERS
TO SERVE LOT H', CLAPP-THOMSSEN IVY HILL 2ND
WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the City Council requesting
sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water improvements to serve Clapp-
'??"y:,homssen Ivy Hill 2nd.
"NOWTHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
_endota Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the above described petition be and is hereby accepted by
the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights.
2. That the City Engineer be and is hereby authorized and dir-
ected to prepare a feasibility study as to whether said proposed
improvements are feasible, whether said improvements should best
be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement,
and as to the estimated cost of said improvement.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 21st
day of August, 1984.
U
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
0
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By.
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
[7
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
SANITARY SEWERS, WATER, AND STORM SEWERS CONSTRUCTION
TO SERVE LOT H, CLAPP-THOMSSEN IVY HILL 2ND
(IMPROVEMENT NO. 84, PROJECT NO. 3)
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has submitted his report to the City Council
with respect to the proposed construction of the following improvements
to serve Lot H, Clapp-Thomssen Ivy Hill 2nd, to -wit:
The construction of an extension to the City's sanitary sewer
system, including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acqui-
sition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets
and easements in the area hereinafter more particularly described.
The construction of an extension to the City's water distribution
system including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acqui-
sition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets
and easements in the area hereinafter more particularly described.
The construction of a storm sewer system including appurtenances
and incidental thereto and the acquisition of easements, in and for the
area hereinafter more particularly described.
WHEREAS, Clapp-Thomssen, the owner of the property, has heretofore in
writing petitioned the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights
requesting the above described improvements and in said petition
requested that the entire cost of said improvements be assessed against
said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer reported that the proposed improvement and
construction thereof were feasible and desirable and further reported
on the proposed costs of said improvements and construction thereof;
and
WHEREAS, the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is
situated within the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota
and is more particularly described as follows:
Clapp-Thomssen Ivy Hill 2nd
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows:
1. That the report of said City Engineer be and is hereby
received.
2. That it is advisable, feasible, expedient and necessary that
the City of Mendota Heights construct the above described
improvements, and it is hereby ordered that said improvement be
made.
3. That the City Engineer be and he is hereby authorized and
directed to prepare plans and specifications for said improvement.
4. That said improvement shall hereafter be known and designated
as Improvement No. 84, Project No. 3.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 21st
day of August, 1984.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
^
0
By
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 17, 1984
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin Frazell
City Administrator
SUBJECT: Industrial Development Bonds
INTRODUCTION
We have received notification from the Department of Energy and Economic
Development that Mendota Heights will be "entitled" to issue up to
$3,108,540.•in industrial development bonds under the recently passed federal
and state statutes. However, in order to maintain this entitlement, we
must issue a letter of intent to use the allocation, along with a 1%
reservation fee ($31,085) to the state prior to September lst, 1984. We
are recommending that we do so, with the intention that this bonding
authority will be used by United Properties for construction of additional
buildings in the Mendota Heights Business Park. Further, we are recom-
mending that we make a "discretionary" application in the amount of
$5,000,000 on behalf of the Yorkton Corporation, which is planning the
Conference Center Development on the site immediately west of Gould Battery.
HISTORY AND BACKGROUND
As Council is well aware, the U.S. Congress has limited issuance of
industrial development bonds to $150 per capita for each state. The State
Legislature came up with a mechanism for allocating Minnesota's share of
I.D.B's between the state and local governments, based on historical usage.
After the latest recertification, it was determined that Mendota Heights
would be entitled to issue $3,108,540. On a per capita basis, this is
a very sizeable entitlement compared to other communities.
By September 1, 1984, we are required to issue a letter of intent to
the Department of Economic Development and submit a 1% fee in order to main-
tain our entitlement. If we fail to do so, our entitlement reverts to a
competitive pool. The way the legislation is currently written, future
year's entitlements will reflect the usage of previous years, so it is to
our very definite benefit to try to use all our entitlement.
At Council directive, we sent letters to developers in the community,
as well .as to the city attorney's office and bond underwriters with whom
we have worked, requesting that they let us know by August 10th if they
desire a portion of this entitlement. We have received two requests.
First, is United Properties. United is planning the construction of
three additional buildings immediately east of their current facility
at the corner of Pilot Knob and Mendota Heights Roads. The total cost of
-L -
their project is an estim ted $5,000,000, so that they have indicated
that they could use our a tire 1984 I.D.B. allotment of $3,108,540.
The remainder of their pr ject would be privately financed.
The second request is from the Yorkton Corporation, who was before
the Council on August 7th to request a feasibility report for utilities
on the property west of G uld Battery. As you will probably recall, they
are proposing constructioa of an approximately 60,000 square foot conference
center. They have indicated that they will need $4� to 5 million dollars of
I.D.B. financing for the roject.
Because the I.D.B. b
in the year, the states a
of I.D.B. bonding authori
year. According to the s
preserved by September is
of the original state all
state, including local go
allocations out of this p
September 1st, 1984. Rep.
Economic Development have
good year for requesting
will make it difficult fo:
allocation in the time re
We have met with a r
who has indicated they wo
for the sum of the discre
go participating in our e
for discretionary funding
resolution, after due pub
State by the 20th of a mo
project has been allocate
month. Attached for Coun
by Roger Gordon of the Ci
on the Yorkton request in
would be set for the Coun
Both Dale Glowa of
will be present at the
RECOMMENDATION
11 passed by the U.S. Congress came out so late
d local governments have a very large allocation
y to be used in the remaining 511 months of this
ate legislation, any "entitlement" amounts not
revert to a discretionary pool, as does 20%
cation. All I.D.B. authorized agencies in the
ernment, are eligible to request discretionary
ol. Applications can be submitted beginning .:
esentatives of the Department of Energy and
indicated that they feel this will be a very
dditional allocations, because the time crunch
many local governments to use their full
presentative underwriter for the Yorkton Project,
ld like to have the City file an application
ionary allocation, and would be willing to fore-
titlement amount. In order to file an application
the Council must have passed the usual comfort
is hearing, and file the application with the
th. The State will then indicate whether the
I.D.B. authority by the 5th of the following .:.
it consideration is a resolution, as prepared
y Attorney's office, calling for a public hearing
the amount of $5,000,000. That public hearing
il meeting of September 18th, 1984.
ted Properties, and representatives of Yorkton
cil meeting to discuss their projects.
As indicated above, Staff is of the opinion that we should very def-
initely try to use our "entitlement," to reserve future year's entitle-
ments. It appears that United Properties is in the best position to guarantee
that that allocation will actually be used, and therefore we recommend
that it be earmarked for their project. As they will be required to file
the 1% ($31,085) retentiop fee with the state, we are further recommending
that we waive the normal 2500 issue expense fee that is paid to the City.i-
with agreement that the City will be reimbursed for its expenses after
closing. Upon issuance ok the bonds, the 1% fee is returned by the State.
It is further recommgnded that Council pass the attached resolution
calling fora public hearing on September 18th, to consider the request
a
-3 -
of Yorkton Corporation for an application to the discretionary pool in '
the amount of $5,000,000.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs with the Staff recommendations, it should take the
following action:
1. Motion to authorize Staff to send a letter to the Department of
Energy_ and Economic Development along with a 1% fee indicating
that the City wishes to retain its $3,108,540 I.D.B. allocation,
and further that United Properties- be designated as the user of
that I.D.B. allocation, paying the 1% fee, and that the $2500
issue expense fee be waived until such time as bonds are issued.
2. Motion to pass Resolution 84- , calling for a public hearing on
September 18th to consider a $5,000,000 I.D.B. issue for Yorkton
Corporation.
Attachment
KDF : mm
.";
Respectfully submitted,
Kevin D. Frazell
City Administrator
8Y�
CERTIFICATII N OF MINUTES RELATING TO
$5,000,000 COMMERCIAL EVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS OF 1984
(ALPHA E VIRONMENTS PROJECT)
Issuer: City of Mendota Heights,
Governing Body: City Council
w a`�'iCCani,;'clae time and lace of meetl'n A regular meetin held on August 21 1984 at
;•
o'clock p.m., at the Ciy Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights,
`�?�Minnesofa.
"Anendance at the Meeting:
Present:
Absent:
Documents Attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages):
40 RE5
�J
UTION NO.
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING
AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING TO A PROPOSED PROJECT
UNDER MINNESOTA S, ATUTES, CHAPTER 474, AS AMENDED
I, the undersigned, being the duly qi
issuing the obligations referred -
documents attached hereto, as des
original records of said body in my
that said documents are a correct
the governing body of said body,
other actions taken and of all docu
was duly held by the governing bod
the members indicated above, pu
required by law.
WITNESS my hand officially as
1984.
.lified and acting recording officer of the public body
in the title of this certificate, certify that the
.-ibed above, have been carefully compared with the
agal custody, from which they have been transcribed;
d complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of
A correct and complete copies of all resolutions and
ents approved by the governing body at said meeting
at the time and place and was attended throughout by
uant to call and notice of such meeting given as
recording officer this day of ,
Signature
City Clerk
(SEAL)
", '05 ,
Councilmember offered the following resolution and moved
its adoption, which motion was seconded by Councilmember
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROJECT
UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT ACT; CALLING FOR A
PUBLIC HEARING THEREON.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota (the
"City"), as follows:
SECTION 1
Recitals
1.1 Larry Lee, on behalf of a Minnesota partnership to be formed in which he will be one
of the general partners (the "Borrower"), has advised this Council of the desire of the
Borrower to acquire land in the City and construct and equip thereon an approximately
55,000 square foot building to be used as an education and convention facility ("Project").
1.2. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474 (the "Act"), to issue its
revenue bonds to finance capital projects, such as the Project, which constitutes property,
real and/or personal, used or useful in connection with a revenue producing enterprise as
contemplated by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.02, Subd. 1(a). The Borrower has
requested that the City issue its revenue bonds in an amount not exceeding Five Million
and 00/100 Dollars ($5,000,000) to finance all or a portion of the cost of the Project.
SECTION 2
Public Hearing
2.1. Section 474.01, Subdivision 7B, of the Act requires that prior to submission of an
application to the Energy and Economic • Development Authority requesting approval of
the Project as required by Section 474.01, Subdivision 7A, of the Act, this Council shall
conduct a public hearing on the proposal to undertake and finance the Project. Pursuant
to that provision, a public hearing on the proposal to undertake and finance the Project is
called and shall be held on September 18, 1984, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall, 750
South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
i
2.2. The City Clerk shall cause notice of the public hearing to be published in the official
newspaper of the City and in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, at least once
not less than fifteen (15) nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed for the
hearing, such notice to be in substantially the following form:
NOTICE OF PL ELIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED
PROJECT AND THE ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS UNDER THE MUNICIPAL
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, MINNESOTA
STATUTES,! CHAPTER 474, AS AMENDED
CITY OF M
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
Heights, Minnesota, will mee
the City Hall, 750 South PI;
purpose of conducting a pu
revenue bonds, in one or mor
ment Act, Minnesota Statut<
the cost of a project. The p
land and the construction anc
be formed in which Larry I
approximately 55,000 square
convention facility. The Pc
Heights, Minnesota, on HighN
the Southeast X of Section
Minnesota. The estimated
$5,000,000. Such principal an
City solely from the revenue
bonds may be secured by a me
holder of any such bond shall
taxing power of the City to
enforce payment against any
DOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
that the City Council of the City of Mendota
on September 18, 1984, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., at
za Drive, 'Mendota Heights, Minnesota, for the
,lic hearing on a proposal that the City issue
series, under the Municipal Industrial Develop -
Chapter 474, as amended, in order to finance
oposed project will consist of the acquisition of
equipping thereon by a Minnesota partnership to
-e will be one of the general partners, of an
foot building to be used as an educational and
)ject will be located in the City of Mendota
ay 110 on the real property legally described as
t7, Township 28N, Range 23, Dakota County,
total amount of the proposed bond issue is
punt and interest thereon shall be payable by the
)ledged to the payment thereof, except that such
•tgage or other encumbrance on the project. No
:ver have the right to compel any exercise of the
pay the bonds or the interest thereon, nor to
roperty of the City except the project.
A draft copy of the proposed application to the Energy and Economic
Development Authority of thState of Minnesota for approval of the project,
together with all attachmen ts and exhibits thereto, is available for public
inspection at the office of the City Clerk between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and
4:30 P.M.
All persons interested may
above.
Dated: August , 1984.
and be heard at the time and place set forth
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
By
City Clerk
City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota
a
2.3. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Energy and Economic Development
Authority of the State of Minnesota, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto,
shall be placed on file at the office of the City Clerk, and shall be available for public
inspection, following the publication of the notice of public hearing, between the hours of
8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M.
Adopted by the Council this 21st day of August, 1984.
Mayor
City Clerk
(SEAL)
Upon call of the roll, the vote on said motion was as follows:
In Favor Opposed Absent Not Voting
CITY
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. Frazell
City Administrator
SUBJECT: Visitation Convent F
(Case No. 84-12)
INTRODUCTION
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 17, 1984
1 and Wetlands Permit
At the July 17th meeting, 'ouncil voted to deny the request of Johnson
Brothers Construction for fill and wetlands permitSfor the Visitation Convent
land south of Mendota Heights oad. Johnson Brothers and the Convent are now
requesting Council reconsideration of that action.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Council denied the fill a.
over vegetation, height of th
the committment of the Visita
Johnson Brothers and the Conv
subsequently contacted staff
Council reconsideration. Sta
ing all of the items of conce
have been completed and are e.
Section 5.6(6) concerning con
for a conditional use permit
be resubmitted for a period o
denial, except on grounds of
found to be valid by the Plan
eager to obtain this permit a
Commission previously recomme:
have requested that we bypass
this back to the Planning Com
that the Planning Commission
that should the Council wish
do so. Attorney Hart is of t
action on the permit request,
hearing notice to property ow
As indicated in the encl
Board at Visitation, Visitat
number of representatives an
to discuss Council issues of
presentation, a motion for r
the presentation Council fee
granting the permit, it shou
d wetlands permit request because of concerns
fill, location of topsoil stockpiles, and
ion Convent to responsibility for the project.
nt were disappointed in Council action, and
o determine what steps might be taken to urge
f suggested a resubmittal of documents address -
n expressed by the Council. Those documents
closed with the Council packet. City Code
itional use permits reads: "No application
hich has been denied wholly or in part shall
six months from the date of said order of
ew evidence or roof of change of conditions
ing Commission: Because Johnson Brothers is
d begin fill work, and because the Planning
ded approval of the permit, the applicants
the delay which would be inherent in sending
Fission. City Attorney Tom Hart is of the opinion
.s an advisory body to the City Council, and
o waive this code requirement, it could legally
e opinion however, that prior to any Council
we should send the ten day required public
ers within 350 feet.
ed letter from Charles F. Hall, Chairman of the
n and Johnson Brothers have arranged to have a
technical experts present at Tuesday's evening
oncern. If Council is amenable to hearing their
onsideration should be adopted. If following
that there is sufficient justification for
call for a public hearing on September 4, 1984.
- 2 -
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council is amenable to reconsidering this issue, it should first pass
a motion for reconsideration of the item, then hear the testimony and presen-
tations from the Visitation Convent and Johnson Brothers.
If following that presentation Council is of a mind to consider granting
the permit, it should call for a public hearing on September 4, 1984.
Respectfully ubmitted,
Kevin D. Frazell
City Administrator
KDF:madlr
attachment
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
M E M 0
TO: Mayor, City Council, and
FROM: Gene Lange,
Fire Marshal
SUBJECT: Repeal of Ordinance
August 17, 1984
City, dministrator
. 1005
Introduction City Ordinanci No. 1005, an ordinance regulating the
setting of fires and providing for the controlling of .f,...res, is no
longer needed. Regulations set by the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency ban all outside fires except by vtitten..permits issued by
their Agency.
History--and-Background Ordinance No. 1005 was written many gears
ago when open burning was a dommon practice in the City. At that
time there was a need to control this practice.
Discussion The regulations now in force by the Pollution Control
Agency's Air Quality Control Section make this ordinance outdated
and contradictory to the regulations.
Alternatives Allow a useless ordinance to remain in force, or
approve the repealing ordinagce prepared by Staff.
Recommendation Repeal of Ordinance No. 1005.
Action Required Pass the Re�ealing ordinance before the Council:
attachment
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1005
,The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, ordains
;�,as r follows .
SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 1005 entitled "An Ordinance Regulating the
°c,,,:Set:,ing of Fires and Providing for the Controlling of Fires within the
-�?;Uil4lage of Mendota Heights, and Providing a Penalty for Violation Thereof"
is hereby repealed.
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its publication according to law.
Enacted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 21st day
of August 1984.
i
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN M. SWANSON
CITY CLERK
ROBERT G. LOCKWOOD
MAYOR
L_J
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 17, 1984
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. Fraze/
City Adminis ator
SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance Prohibiting the Use of Barbecues in Multiple'
Dwelling Buildings
Attached is the memo and proposed Ordinance from Fire Marshal Gene Lange
concerning prohibiting the use of barbecues in multiple dwellings. Because
Gene was not able to be in attendance at the August 7th meeting, Council ,
tabled this item to August 21. Gene will be present to discuss his reasons
for recommending Council adoption of this Ordinance, and to answer any
questions.
KDF:madlr
attachments
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
M E M 0
July 27, 1984
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City
.�dministrator
FROM: Gene Lange
Fire Marshal
SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance Establishing a Fire Prevention Code
Introduction
The Fire Department has at the present time about seven multiple
residential buildings in its fire district. Except for the Colonial
Club apartments in Lilydale the units are mainly owner occupied. The
constuction of the 165 rental units on Lexington Avenue and the poss-
ibilty of future rental units requires the establishment of a fire
prevention code.
History and Background .
The request for this ordinance is based on the experiences of neigh-
boring cities with rental apartment units. The department's concern at
this time involve two areas. The first is the use of barbecues on the
C wood framed balconies or patios and the second deals with the storage of
gasoline and other flammable liquids on balconies and underground garages.
The condominiums and other multiple units we now protect have not been a
problem to the department as far as barbecues and flammable liquids are
concerned. They are either all masonry construction, have no balconies,
..or are controlled by the condominium rules and regulations. We did have
one gas barbecue explode in the courtyard.of a townhouse several years ago.
The resulting fire caused several thousand dollars in damage. However, this
ordinance would not apply to the design of the building.
Discussinn
Considering the size and frame construction of the Lexington Apartments
and the possibility of future constuction we feel that it is time to estab-
lish a fire prevention code for multiple dwelling units. More study will
be needed before additional sections are added to this ordinance.
Alternatives
Rely on the management of the apartment complex to control this matter.
Recommendation
Council approval of this, the beginning of a comprehensive fire preven-
tion code.
Action Required
Passing the ordinance as written or amended.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
Codified as Ordinance No.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A FIRE PREVENTION CODE FOR MULTIPLE
DWELLINGS AND PROVIDING FOR PENALTY FOR VIOLATION THEREOF
SECTION 1. FIRES OR BARBECUES ON BALCONIES OR PATIOS
1.1 No person shall construct, erect, install or use any incinerator or barbecue, nor
kindle or maintain any open flame, charcoal or other material on any balcony or
patio which is attached to, or within 15 feet of, any townhouse, condominium or
apartment building in which there are two or more separate living units on more
than one level unless the separate living units each has its own means of ingress
and egress or unless the entire building and patio or balcony is constructed of
non-combustible materials such as concrete or masonry.
1.2 No person shall store any fuel, barbecue, torch, or other similar heating or
lighting chemicals or devices in either of the above places.
SECTION 2. FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS
2.1 Class I, II or III -A liquids shall not be stored near exits, stairways or areas
normally used for the egress.
2.2 The storage of Class I, II or III -A liquids in closed containers shall comply
with the following occupancy schedule except that the Fire Chief may impose a
quantity limitation or require greater protection where, in his opinion, unusual
hazard to life or property is involved or he may authorize increase of these
amounts where the type of construction, fire protection provided or other factors
substantially reduce the hazard:
A. Dwellings and apartment houses containing not more than three dwelling units
and accompanying attached or detached garages. Storage other than fuel oil
prohibited, except that which is required for maintenance or equipment
operation which shall not exceed 10 gallons. Such liquids shall be stored in
metal closed containers or safety cans.
B. Apartment houses containing more than three dwelling units. Storage is
prohibited, except that which is required for maintenance and operation of
building and operation of equipment. Storage in excess of 10 gallons shall
not be allowed.
C. The storage of Class I, II or III -A liquids in any amount, or their empty
containers, in the underground garages or storage areas is prohibited.
SECTION 3. ENFORCEMENT
3.1 The Chief of the City Volunteer Fire Department or such members of the Volunteer
Fire Department as authorized by him, shall enforce the provisions of this
ordinance.
3.2 The Fire Chief may recommend the employment of technical inspectors, who, when
such authorization is made by the City Council shall be selected on the basis of
their expertise and experience.
SECTION 4. PENALTIES
4.1 Any person operating or maintaining any occupancy or premises subject to this
ordinance who shall permit any fire hazard to exist on premises under his control
or who shall fail to take immediate action to abate a fire hazard when ordered or
notified to do so by the chief or his duly authorized representative shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor.
4.2 For purposes of this ordinance, the term "misdemeanor" means a penal offense or
crime which the Council is empowered to punish with fine or imprisonment, and a
petty misdemeanor as defined by State Law.
4.3 Any person who violates a provision of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor
and upon conviction thereof may be punished by a fine of not more than $500 and
imprisonment for a term not to exceed 90 days, or both. Each act of violation
and every day on which a violation occurs or continues is a separate violation.
SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
publication according to law.
Enacted and ordained into an Ordinance this 21st
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
day of August, 1984.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Robert G. Lockwood
Mayor
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 17, 1984
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Ad nistrator
FROM: Larry E. Shaughnessy, Financial Advisor
SUBJECT: Handicapped Accessibility
INTRODUCTION
The current Federal Revenue Sharing Act requires that all cities
receiving funds develop and adopt a policy on Handicapped Accessibility for
their city. We are required to follow the following schedule for compliance
with the Act:
1. Complete self-evaluation and determine area on non-compliance by
October 17, 1984. Name person to receive complaints.
2. Make non-structural changes necessary to comply by October 17, 1984.
3. Complete structural changes by October, 1986.
Staff has conducted a "self-evaluation" which is attached hereto. In
general, all areas have been found to comply with appropriate state and
federal requirements, and we should continue to monitor to ensure future
compliance.
A suggested "Grievance Procedure" has also been.drafted, and is also
attached. The Procedure requires that a Grievance first be submitted to the
City Administrator for action, and if no satisfaction can be obtained, to a
Board of Review which would be set up in the future by the Council.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Adopt Resolution No. 84-, recognizing our Handicapped Accessibility,
establishing the grievance procedure and confirming our self-evaluation.
LES:madlr
attachments
1,11Y OF IMENUUI/k HL1UH15
DAKOTA COIUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 84-
HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBILITY
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights has conducted a self evaluation survey
of the City facilities and prog`ams (Exhibit A) to determine Handicapped
Accessibility in compliance wit f1 Office of Revenue Sharing Regulations Section
504; and
WHEREAS, the City determin's that its facilities and programs are in general
compliance with the requirements of the legislation for Handicapped Accessibility;
3,and
WHEREAS, steps have been taken to correct minor deficiencies prior to
'f'"Qctober 1986 where structural recisions are necessary; and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes its responsibilities to make programs and
facilities available to all handicapped residents.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ;ESOLVED, that the City of Mendota Heights finds
that to the extent possible all facilities and programs open to the public shall
be accessible to handicapped individuals; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
spirit of this resolution that t
that the City Administrator be a
of the City and that the forms a
violation of the Handicapped Acc
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that)
shall be defined as a person thaj
substantially limits one or more
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
the City shall establish a Commil
handicapped at -large representati
such complaints.
Adopted by the City Council of ti
August, 1984.
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
to facilitate continued compliance with the
ie Grievance Procedure attached is Exhibit B and ,
id is hereby appointed as the Grievance Officer '
:tached as Exhibit C be the manner in which any
!ssibility may be imported to the Grievance Office;
for the purposes --of this resolution a Handicapped
has a physical or mental impairment which
major life activities; and
in the event of an unresolved complaint, that
:tee comprised of a medical representative, a
ve, an elected City Official to hear and resolve
ie City of Mendota Heights this 21st day of
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Robert G. Lockwood
Mayor
ATTACHN r
A
'
HANDICAPPED SELF
EVALUATION
'.
Physical Facilities
USE
TYPE
DEPARTMENT
PHYSICAL AVAILABILITY
ACTION
City Hall
Rental
Adm.-Eng.-Pol.
All areas comply with, possible
Advise Landlord
Council
exception of Drinking Fountain
of deficiency
height
Fire Hall
Owned
Fire
Non Complying
New Facility under
construction, that
will be in compliance
occupancy 1/1/85
Public Works
Garage
Owned
Streets, Parks,
All areas comply, with possible
Will be changed prior to
Sewer
exception of Drinking Fountain
10/1/86 where applicabl
height
Park Areas
Owned
Park
All facilities comply
Programs
Action Necessary
Administration
Council meetings provide written
material when
necessary and on advance notice
deaf and sightless
Handicapped can be accomodated.
Parks
Programs adopted to Handicapped
when necessary.
Fire
Comply.
Police
Comply.
Public Works
Comply.
Employment
Forms will be revised to indicate Equal Opportunity
Employment.
VotingP�dce
Conform with State requirements.
: n
.`y
a
ATTACHMENT B
HANDICAPPED GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
3 ; , • , '; : ,.,;,.;'.----:Complaints regarding handicapped resident access will be submitted in
writing to the City Administrator for resolution. A record will be
--maintained of these complaints and action taken. A decision will be
rendered within 10 working days.
-<,K2- If the complaint cannot be resolved to the satisfaction of the complainant
by the City Administrator, it will be forwarded to the "Handicapped
Resident Access Committee" composed of representatives from the following
groups in the community: the elected body, the handicapped, at -large re-
presentation and, finally, health/medical representation. The Handicapped
Resident Access Committee will be appointed by the Governing Body.
3. The Committee should be charged by the elected body to establish ground
rules or bylaws for hearing complaints, requests, or suggestions from
handicapped persons regarding access to public facilities, services,
activities, and functions in the community. Further, the committee
should be directed to hear such complaints in public after adequate
public notice, in an unbiased, objective manner, and to make a written
decision within 30 days of notification. Proceedings of the committee
should be recorded and maintained.
4. If the complaint cannot be resolved to the satisfaction of the complainant
by the Handicapped Resident Access Committee, such complaint will be heard
by the Governing Body discussed at an open, public meeting of the elected
body and a determination made within 30 days as to a decision on the
request or complaint. The decision of the Governing Body shall be final.
5. A record of action taken on each request or complaint must be maintained
as a part of the records or minutes at each level of the grievance process.
6. The right of a person to a prompt and equitable resolution of the complaint
filed hereunder shall not be impaired by the person's pursuit of other remedies
such as the filing of a Section 504 complaint with the Office of Revenue Sharing,
U.S. Department of the Treasury. Utilization of this grievance procedure is
not a prerequisite to the pursuit of other remedies.
0
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
a ,•,
s
r xY<Fli'OM-- *:,Kevin D. Frazell
' City Administrator
August 9, 1984
;,;`-SUB3ECT: Proposed Change in 1984 Holiday Schedule
INTRODUCTION
As Christmas Day (December 25) falls on a Tuesday this year, the office
employees have requested that they be allowed to take the day before Christmas,
Monday, December 24, as a City holiday, in lieu of Columbus Day, which falls
on Monday, October 8th. I am recommending that we make that amendment to the
holiday schedule for 1984.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
The City Personnel Code and Labor Contracts stipulate ten (10) holidays,
plus one floating holiday. The fixed holidays are as stipulated by state
statute, with two exceptions: Good Friday and Columbus Day. Columbus Day can
be exchanged for the day after Thanksgiving.
The holiday schedule is something that has been discussed at some length
by employees since my arrival in Mendota Heights. In general, there seems to
be some interest among the employees in making a permanent change from Good
Friday to the day before Christmas and trading Columbus Day for the day after
Thanksgiving. However, I am not suggesting any permanent change at this time.
One of the objectives for the Administration department for next year is to
do a comprehensive review of the City personnel code, and I believe the issue
of the holiday schedule should be addressed at that time.
As indicated above however, the office employees would like to have a
change this year from Columbus Day to the day before Christmas. With Christmas
falling on a Tuesday, it would be a great inconvenience for people to have to
work on Monday, and they obviously would prefer a four-day weekend. The
employees preferred having December 24th be a holiday this year to letting each
person take vacation or a floating holiday, because with the offices open, at
least some of the staff would have to work that day.
I have also discussed this option with the Public Works employees, but they
have decided that they would prefer to leave their holiday schedule as is.
Therefore, the proposed change would apply only to the City Hall office staff.
RECOMMENDATION
So that the employees can enjoy a four-day Christmas weekend, it is recommended
that Council amend the 1984 holiday schedule as discussed above.
- 2 -
ACTION REQUIRED
Motion to amend the holiday schedule in the City Personnel code for
calendar year 1984, eliminating Columbus Day, October 8th, and adding the
day before Christmas, December -24th.
Respectful submitted,
Kevin D. Frazell
City Administrator
KDF:madlr
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
lYTO-17
August 13, 1984
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. FrazelY 0
City Administ ator
,t,�..,;4S,UBJECT: Identification of potential Community Development Block Grant Projects
As Council may recall, based on its population, Dakota County has been declared
i -;:as an "entitlement" county for the federal Community Development Block Grant Program.
As such, the county and the municipalities within the county will be receiving approx-
imately $1.2 million dollars in CDBG funds for fiscal years 1985 and 1986.
The county wide implementation task force and the county board have subdivided
the cities in the county into four groupings. Each group receives a percentage of
the total county allocation, based on its population. We're in a group with South
St. Paul, West St. Paul, Lilydale, Mendota, and Inver Grove Heights, with that group
receiving approximately $360,000.00 annually.
It is that time of year when the local district task force, on which Councilmember•
Witt serves as our representative, will begin consideration of how to divide up
these funds for projects in the communities in our group. Councilwoman Witt has
asked that the staff and City Council suggest potential projects that she can suggest
to the task force.
Attached is a memorandom to Councilwoman Witt from me, dated January 4th, in
which I informed her of projects which had been tentatively identified by the staff.
To meet the criteria for CDBG funding, a project must meet at least one of the fol-
lowing three criteria:
1. Primarily benefit low and moderate income persons (those with 80 percent
or less of the metropolitan area median income).
2. Remove a blighted or slum condition.
3. Meet an urgent community need.
I am not confident that all of the ten potential projects identified by the staff
would be eligible for funding under those criteria; however, there would be some.
As indicated in the January 4th memo, I feel that Mendota Heights would get the most
benefit from the CDBG allocation for programs which provide a direct subsidy to
targeted population groups (i.e. low or moderate income persons), than for a more
comprehensive urban renewel type project.
ACTION REQUIRED:
The only action required at this point is for Council to suggest any other
possible projects or types of projects that Councilwoman Witt should suggest to the
area task force.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 4, 1984
T0: Liz Witt ��1 � I
i
FROM: Kevin D. Frazell
City Administrator Designee
",;S:UBJECT: Potential CDBG Projects in Mendota Heights
x.
Following is a list and brief description of potential Mendota
Heights CDBG projects which have been identified by the staff:
1. Acacia Residential Utilities (Furlong Addition) -- Underwrite
excessive costs of installation of water and sanitary sewer
to development.
2. Rogers Road Area Redevelopment -- Relocation of families and
demolition of existing residential structures to make area
viable for commercial development.
3. Old Fire Station Area Rehabilitation/Redevelopment -- Possible
rehabilitation of fire station into a community facility, or
demolition of fire station and surrounding blighted structures.
4. Street Improvements and Storm Sewer Installation in Northeast
Area of the City -- Direct special assessment subsidy to low and
moderate income and elderly residents.
5. Sanitary Sewer to St. Peter's Church -- Direct subsidy of cost.
6. Sanitary Sewer to Jack's Manufacturing --Direct subsidy of cost.
7. Mendota/Mendota Heights Storm Sewer Problem -- Underwriting cost
of storm sewer improvement to resolve problem of drainage from
Mendota Heights into Mendota.
8. Handicapped Accessibility -- Underwriting costs of accessibility
features in parks, and in public/private buildings in the community.
9. Affordable Housing -- Subsidy to write down the cost of special
assessments and/or land to make housing sites more affordable for
low and moderate income persons.
10. Rehabilitation/Weatherization of Existing Housing Stock, would be
a supplemented bolstering of effort already carried on by the
Dakota County HRA.
As I indicated in our phone conversation, I feel that Mendota Heights
will be more benefitted by a distribution formula which recognizes direct
Liz Witt
January 4, 1984
Page Two
subsidies to persons with low and moderate income within larger projects,
rather than having to qualify under some type of a comprehensive neighbor-
hood strategic approach.
If I can offer any other assistance to you as you serve on the Task
Force, please give me a call.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 16, 1984
TO: Mayor and City Council n
.FROM: Kevin D. Frazell,%!/
City Administrator
SUBJECT: County Legislative Committee
The Dakota County Chamber of Commerce has taken the initiative to set
up a County -wide Legislative Committee. The purpose of the Committee is to
serve as a forum for local government officials and business people in the
County to discuss issues of common concern to Dakota County. Examples of
the kinds of issues the Committee hopes to deal with include representation
on the Metropolitan Council and Federal and State funding for highway projects
in Dakota County.
Attached is a recent letter from the Chamber requesting our participation.
They are requesting that the City Administrator serve, and that the Council
also designate that the Mayor or another elected official serve as the second
representative.
ACTION REQUIRED
To designate a member of the Council to serve on the Dakota County Chamber
of Commerce Legislative Committee.
attachment
KDF:madlr
The Dakota County Chamber of Commerce is sponsoring the formation of
a county -wide Legislative Committee. The first meeting is scheduled
for THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1984, 8:00 a.m. at BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD,
Highway 13 & Yankee Doodle Road, Eagan.
adjacent to the cafeteria and breakfast
through the cafeteria line.
We will be meeting in a room
may be purchased by going
This Committee will include representatives from the following cities
and Chambers of Commerce: Apple Valley, Burnsville, Coates, Eagan,
Farmington, Hampton, Hastings, Inver Grove Heights, Lakeville, Lily -
dale, Mendota, Mendota Heights, Randolph, Rosemount, South St. Paul,
Sunfish Lake, Vermillion and West St. Paul.
We are requesting that the membership from each city be comprised of
the following: one or two business representatives from each Chamber
of Commerce and the CityAdminis_rator and/or Mayor or other elected
official We are also requesting that the Dakota County Commissioners,
the Dakota County Administrator, and the Dakota County Lobbyist be
members of the Committee.
Our purposes in sponsoring this Committee are as follows:
1. To enable the business representatives from each of the
Chambers to become better informed about some of the
major issues in Dakota County and report this information
to their Chambers.
2. To promote unifying Dakota County cities on those issues
where we have a common agreement.
3. To have greater impact on State and Federal legislation
by drafting proposals and meeting with Legislators.
It is anticipated that the Committee would meet once a month from Sep-
tember through May. The Committee would be non-partisan and would
discuss issues we believe the cities of Dakota County could be united
behind.
This is intended to be an organizational meeting, and an Agenda of the
first meeting will be forwarded to you during the month of August. Mr.
Barry Ti.11is, the Dakota County Lobbyist, will speak briefly. He will
describe how he believes the Committee could benefit Dakota County and
how he could assist the Committee.
Yours very truly,
Elizabeth A. Holt, Chairperson
Dakota County Chamber of Commerce
Legislative Committee
EAH:db
Sam Shepard, President
Dakota County
Chamber of Commerce
33 E. Wentworth • Suite 101 • West St. Paul, Minnesota 55118 0 457-4921
EAGAN • LILYDAI.E • MENDOTA a MENDOTA HEIGHTS 9 WEST ST. PARI.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. Frazell
City Administrator
August 9, 1984
,-"SUBJECT: Membership in the Suburban Rate Authority (SRA)
I have recently received the attached letter from the Suburban Rate
Authority, notifying us of their adopted 1985 budget and the assessment.
Our cost to belong next year would be $736.20, payable one-half in February,
and one-half in August, 1985.
At the time of the SRA annual meeting, there seemed to be a distinct lack
of Council enthusiasm about active involvement in the SRA. Therefore, I
thought it appropriate to bring before you the question of whether we intend
to continue our membership, so that we can either include the amount in the
1985 proposed budget or notify SRA that we no longer intend to be a member.
ACTION REQUIRED
To determine whether Mendota Heights will continue to be a member of the
Suburban Rate Authority, and budget for our 1985 dues.
Respectful y submitted,
2� ;��
Kevin D. Frazell
City Administrator
KDF:madlr
attachment
Very truly yours,
Fred G. Moore
Chairman
cc: SRA Director, City of Mendota Heights
City of Plymouth, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Telephone 559-2800
August 1, 1984
Members
g%
Bloomington
Brooklyn Center
Mr. Kevin Frazell
Brooklyn ParkBurn
City Administrator Q
Champlin
City of Mendota Heights
Circle Pines
750 So. Plaza Drive
Columbia Heights
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Deephaven
Eden Prairie
Edina
RE: 1985 SRA Assessment
Excelsior
Fridley
Greenwood
Hastings
At its April 18, 1984 meeting, the SRA Board adopted a
Hopkins
proposed 1985 budget which included an assessment of the
L. St. Croix Beach
Lauderdale
membership. This proposed budget was provided to each
Loretto
SRA member with the minutes of the April meeting. On
Maple Plain
July 18, 1984 the SRA Board unanimously approved the
Maplewood
zghts
proposed budget and assessment. A copy of the Board
M�eto �ota
Minutes, including the assessment list, is enclosed.
Minnetrista
Mounds view
The assessments are payable one-half in February and
New Brighton
North St. Paul
one-half in August, 1985. An invoice will be sent in
9
Orono
January, 1985.
Osseo
Plymouth
Richfield
Your council may be interested in the SRA' s recent
Robbinsdale
success in the Northwestern Bell rate case. Through SRA
Roseville
intervention, a very substantial rate relief was granted
St. Louis Park
Shakopee
to Bell customers in Tiers II through IV. This relief is
Shoreview
expected to be approximately $4 million per year and it
shorewood
is a direct result of an expenditure of approximately
spring Park
Yadnazs Heights
$40, 000 by SRA. More detail is provided in the enclosed
Victoria
minutes.
Wayzata
woodland
The continued support of the City of Mendota Heights is
very important to the continued success of SRA. If I can
provide any additional information, please do not hesi-
tate to call.
Very truly yours,
Fred G. Moore
Chairman
cc: SRA Director, City of Mendota Heights
City of Plymouth, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Telephone 559-2800
MEMORANDUM
August 17, 1984
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Gene Lange, Police Investigato` u
UB3 Speed Limit on Lexington Ave. (Dakota County Rd. 43) --
Highway 110 to Mendota Heights Road
Introduction
change of traffic patterns and traffic count has brought about the question
> iP;of a reasonable speed limit for the above -noted section of Dakota County
highway which is within the City limits of Mendota Heights.
History and Background
For many years the posted speed limit for the above -noted section of Lexington
Avenue has been 40 mph from Highway 110 south to Wagon Wheel Trail, and from
Wagon Wheel Trail to Mendota Heights Road it has been posted at 50 mph.
Discussion
For a number of years the Police Department has noted a steady increase in the
traffic using Lexington Avenue. During rush hours the route becomes congested
with vehicles carrying workers to and from their place of employment. The
growth of the Industrial Parks to the south, and the development of residential
areas, both north and south, have caused this growth. The roadway is narrow
and this adds to the congestion during peak traffic hours. About a month ago
I had a conversation with Mr. Pete Sorenson, Assistant County Highway Engineer,
regarding a study of the speed zones on this section of roadway. Mr. Sorenson
was aware of the development of the apartment units on this section and also
the ever increasing volume of vehicles. During the conversation it was decided
that a traffic study should be ordered. Mr. Sorenson stated that their depart-
ment contracts with the State of Minnesota to make the proper study. We both
felt that the study should be held up until the apartment complex was closer
to completion and occupied. We also talked about the affect the construction
workers' vehicles, that are parked on one side of the road during weekdays,
would have on the study as they will not be there once construction is completed.
Alternatives
There are two courses of action for this concern. The first is to wait with
the study until conditions are closer to what they will be once the construction
is completed. The second course would be to order the study now and live
with the results for the next four to five years.
Recommendation
It is my recommendation that the study be postponed until the apartment
complex is at least 75% occupied, and the construction vehicles are no
longer on the right of way.
Action Required
Select a date the Council feels will best solve the situation.
-2-
Qr „
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. Frazell
City Administrator
RE: Community Profile
August 17, 1984
Attached for Council information is a copy of the Mendota Heights statistics,
from the May, 1984 Community Profiles published by the Metropolitan Council.
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
HOUSING
1.
Housing Units and Percent Change
1970
6,565 7,288
14.
1.665
2.
Housing Units. 1982 Estimate
2.468
Number
1970
3.
Housing Units by Type
Units Percent
11955
One -Unit Detached
1.473 95.5
514
0ne-Unit Attached
46 3.0
791
Two Units
24 1.6
2,073
Three or Four Units
0 0.0
934
Five or More Units
0 0.0
511
Mob ite Homes
0 0.0
4.
Housing Tenure
1970
1970
Percent Owner -Occupied
93.2
1,641
Percent Renter -Occupied
6.8
S.
Condominium Units, 1980
177
6.
Rental Units by Monthly Rent, 1980
Number
5199 or Lower
19
63
$200 - S249
7
132
5250 - 5299
3
5300 - S399
10
1,839
$400 or Higher
11
7.
Median Monthly Rent, 1980
5243
S.
Owner -Occupied Units by Value, 19801
Number
105
S39r999 or Lower
49
540,000 - $49,999
87
22
$50,000 - S79,999
650
12
$80,000 - S99,999
362
Number
5100,000 - 5149,999
452
213
$150,000 or Higher
251
9.
Median Value, Owner -Occupied
$87,700
346
Housing, 1980
$30,000 - $49,999
779
Ownership
10.
Percent low -and Motl.-Income Units
6.4
$33,855
Percent Modest -Cost Units
30.4
535,362
22.
1973
1.7
UnitsPercent
11.
Approved Subsidized Housing
0 0.0
12.
Age of Housing by Year guilt
Ownership
1939 or Earlier
165
1940 - 1949
123
1950 - 1959
733
1960 - 1969'
443
1970 to March 1980
666
POPULATION
Percent
1980 Change
2.292 37.7
1980
Units Percent
2,00188.3
109 4.8
13 0.6
6 0.3
136 6.1
0 0.0
1980
96.9
3.1
Percent
38.0
14.0
6.0
20.0
22.0
Percent
2.6
4.7
35.1
19.6
24.4
13.6
Rental
42.0
14.5
1982
Units Percent
15 0.6
Rental
22
0
0
0
32
41
Percent
Change
11.0
Percent
7.0
26.8
7.1
10.9
28.4
12.8
7.0
1980
2,210
3.29
Percent
9.8
12.0
15.8
35.7
26.7
MIESVILLE
DAKOTA COUNTY
1970
43
51
1970
Units Percent
38100.0
0 0.0
C 0.0
C 0.0
0 0.0
C 0.0
1970
86.8
13.2
0
Number
2
1
1
0
0
$200
Number
6
2
16
3
1
0
$61,300
Ownership
20.0
40.0
1973
Units Percent
0 0.0
Ownership
12
0
5
14
6
1970
192
180
Number
20
54
15
21
36
16
17
1970
43
4.47
4
2
41
0
2
0
0
Number
22
8
13
8
5
$18,333
525,000
0.0
Percent
1980 Change
50 16.3
1980
Units Percent
40 85.1
2 4J
0 0.0
5 10.6
G 0.0
0 0.0
1980
81.6
18.4
Percent
50.0
25.0
25.0
0.0
0.0
Percent
21.4
7.1
57.1
10.7
3.6
0.0
RentaL
44.4
0.0
1982
units Percent
0 0.0
Rental
6
0
4
0
0
Percent
1980 Change
179 -6.8
Percent
11.2
30.2
8.4
11.7
20.1
8.9
9.5
1980
49
3.65
Percent
39.3
14.3
23.2
14.3
8.9
1970 1980
13.
Population and Percent Change
6,565 7,288
14.
Population, 1983 Estimate
7,520
15.
Population Age Distribution, 1980
Number
0 - 5
510
6 - 18
11955
19 - 24
514
25 - 34
791
35 - 54
2,073
55 - 64
934
65 or Older
511
HOUSEHOLDS
1970
16.
Households
1,641
17.
Persons per Household
3.97
18.
Household Composition. 1980
One Person:
Mate
63
Female
132
Two Persons or More:
Married -Couple Family
1,839
Other Family
Male Householder
37
Female Householder
105
Non -Family:
Male Householder
22
Female Householder
12
19.
Income Distribution, 1979
Number
$9,999 or Lower
213
$10,000 - $19,999
262
$20,000 - S29,999
346
$30,000 - $49,999
779
$50,000 or Higher
583
20.
Median Household Income, 1979
$33,855
21.
Median Family Income. 1979
535,362
22.
Percent Minority Population, 1980
1.7
1980
Units Percent
2,00188.3
109 4.8
13 0.6
6 0.3
136 6.1
0 0.0
1980
96.9
3.1
Percent
38.0
14.0
6.0
20.0
22.0
Percent
2.6
4.7
35.1
19.6
24.4
13.6
Rental
42.0
14.5
1982
Units Percent
15 0.6
Rental
22
0
0
0
32
41
Percent
Change
11.0
Percent
7.0
26.8
7.1
10.9
28.4
12.8
7.0
1980
2,210
3.29
Percent
9.8
12.0
15.8
35.7
26.7
MIESVILLE
DAKOTA COUNTY
1970
43
51
1970
Units Percent
38100.0
0 0.0
C 0.0
C 0.0
0 0.0
C 0.0
1970
86.8
13.2
0
Number
2
1
1
0
0
$200
Number
6
2
16
3
1
0
$61,300
Ownership
20.0
40.0
1973
Units Percent
0 0.0
Ownership
12
0
5
14
6
1970
192
180
Number
20
54
15
21
36
16
17
1970
43
4.47
4
2
41
0
2
0
0
Number
22
8
13
8
5
$18,333
525,000
0.0
Percent
1980 Change
50 16.3
1980
Units Percent
40 85.1
2 4J
0 0.0
5 10.6
G 0.0
0 0.0
1980
81.6
18.4
Percent
50.0
25.0
25.0
0.0
0.0
Percent
21.4
7.1
57.1
10.7
3.6
0.0
RentaL
44.4
0.0
1982
units Percent
0 0.0
Rental
6
0
4
0
0
Percent
1980 Change
179 -6.8
Percent
11.2
30.2
8.4
11.7
20.1
8.9
9.5
1980
49
3.65
Percent
39.3
14.3
23.2
14.3
8.9
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 21, 1984
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. Frazell, City Administrator
,h' Add -On Agenda for August 21, 1984
..;-'Four items are recommended for addition to this evening's agenda, and one
°' •;,• ;for .tabeling.
3.'', -Adoption of Agenda
It is recommended that Council adopt the agenda with the addition of Items
4 i, 71, 7m, and 7n.
4i. Invitation to LMC regional meeting in Lonsdale
Attached is a letter from Francis T. Turek, Mayor of Lonsdale, inviting us to
the LMC regional meeting on September 26. Anyone interested in attending should so
indicate, so we can make reservations.
6c. Cherry Hill 2nd Addition Surface Water Runoff
Mr. and Mrs. Gaddy and Mr. and Mrs. Trudeau have requested tabeling of this
item to September 18.
71. Summary Publication of Liquor Ordinance
Attached is a memo from City Clerk, Kathy Swanson, requesting Council action
to allow summary publication of the recently passed liquor ordinance.
7m. Designation of Deputy Clerk for Election
Attached is a memo from City Clerk, Kathy Swanson, requesting Council designation
of Engineering Secretary, Diane Ward, as Deputy Clerk for election.
7n. Request of Mendota VFW to Purchase Flag Pole for Fire Station
The Mendota VFW has offered to pay for purchase and installation of the flag
pole at the new Fire Station. This expenditure is already included in the contract
in the amount of $1,851.
Add -On Agenda -- August 21, 1984
If Council accepts the gift, a sign noting the contribution would be placed in
the base. The additional $1,851 would then be available to reduce the project cost
or purchase additional equipment and furnishings.
Respectfully�submitted,
Kevin D. Frazell
City Administrator
City of Lonsdale
LONSDALE, MINNESOTA 55046
Telephone 1-507-744-2327
August 17, 1984
.o the Mayor, Councilmember, All other city officials,
„and their spouses.
Ir -wish to extend to you a cordial invitation to attend
Regional Meeting of the League of Minnesota Cities
'to be held at the American Legion Post #586 in Lonsdale
on September 26, 1984.
The American Legion Club is located at 115 Second Avenue
Northwest, two blocks north of Central Avenue.
Beginning at 2:30 p.m., there will be a roundtable dis-
cussion for all Local Government Officials directed by
Tom Thelen of the League staff.
The dinner will begin promptly at 6:30 p.m. and tickets
are $7.50, including gratuity.
A cash bar social hour will precede the dinner from 5:30-
6:30 p.m. I am enclosing a postcard for reservations
to be returned by September 18, 1984.
You will note that if you make reservations for more per-
sons than actually attend, you may be billed for those
who do not come unless I am notified two days before the
meeting of any changes.
After dinner, there will be a panel discussion by League
staff and board members of questions of concern to attend-
ing cities. Legislators have been invited to attend as
well as representatives from those state agencies who
come into frequent contact with cities. Adjournment will
be no later than 9:30 p.m.
Sincerely,
Francis T. Turek
Mayor
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 21, 1984
A.'sKe-
FROM:
TO: Mayor, City Council and City
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Publication of Liquor Ordinance
"INTRODUCTION
Minnesota Statute, Chapter 543, provides that all adopted ordinances must be
published in the City's legal newspaper before they can become effective. The
Statute further provides that, in the case of lengthy ordinances, if the City
Council determines that publication of the ordinance title and a summary of the
document would "clearly inform the public of the intent and effort of the ordi-
nance," Council may, by 4/5 vote, direct that only the title and summary be
published. The purpose of this memo is to recommend that Council review the
attached liquor ordinance summary and direct its publication.
nTRrTTRR TnM
The cost involved in publishing the entire liquor ordinance would be enorm-
ous. In order to significantly reduce those costs and yet provide a summary
which would meet all legal requirements of MSA 543, I asked the City Attorney's
office to prepare a summary which would meet the legal requirements. A copy of
the summary, prepared by Dave Moran, is attached.
Full compliance with the Statute requires that the Council designate a
location, or locations, where the entire text of the ordinance will be available
for inspection by the public. The summary addresses this requirement by sti-
pulating that the full text will be available for inspection in the City Clerk's
office.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that the Council adopt a motion to authorize summary publication
of the liquor ordinance, Ordinance No. 209, codified as Ordinance No. 1403.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs in the recommendation it should move:
Approval of the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 209, codified as
Ordinance No. 1403, An Ordinance Licensing and Regulating the Sale and Consump-
tion of Intoxicating Liquors in the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County,
Minnesota, adopted August 7, 1983, determining that the summary clearly informs
the public of the ordinance, and directing that the City Clerk submit the summary
for publication in the Sun Newspapers and maintain a complete copy of Ordinance
No. 209 in the City Clerk's office for inspection by any person during regular
office hours.
y .. CODIFIED AS ORDInANCE NO. 1403, AN
ORDINANCE LICENSING AND REGULATING THE
SALE AND CONSUMPTION OF INTOXICATING
LIQUORS IN THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS,
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, ADOPTED AUGUST 7, 1983
THE FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE ABOVE -REFERENCED
ORDINANCE. A PRINTED COPY OF THE FULL TEXT OF THE ORDINANCE
IS AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION BY ANY PERSON DURING REGULAR OFFICE
HOURS AT THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
A licence must be obtained from the City before any person
may sell or store intoxicating liquor within the City. Four
types of licenses are available. "On -Sale" licenses, which
will be issued only to hotels, motels and restaurants. "On -
Sale Wine" licenses, which will be issued only to certain res-
taurants. "On -Sale Club" licenses, which will be issued to
.;;,,.;',bona fide clubs which have been in existence in the City for
fifteen years. Finally, "Off -Sale" licenses, which will be
issued to exclusive liquor stores located in B4 zoning districts.
Any person desiring to obtain any of the above-described
licenses must file a verified application with the City
containing certain information required by Section 4 of the
Ordinance.
Annual license fees shall be in the following amounts:
1. "On -Sale" license: $ 10,000.00
2. "On -Sale Club" license: 200.00
3. "On -Sale Wine" licenses: 2,000.00
4. "Of -Sale" licenses: 150,000.00
The license fees must be paid in full before the original
application or any renewal applications will be accepted. All
licenses expire on June 30th of every year. Applications for
the renewal of existing license must be made at least sixty
days prior to the date of the expiration of the license.
The annual fee for all "On -Sale" licenses granted after the
commencement of the license year will be prorated on a semi-
annual basis.
At the time of the original license application, applicants
must also deposit a $500.00 investigation fee with the City.
If the investigation is conducted solely within the State of
Minnesota, the fee shall be $500.00. For investigations
conducted in whole or in part outside the State of Minnesota,
the applicant shall pay the City's actual investigation costs,
not to exceed $10,000.00. Any investigation fees due in excess
of the $500.00 deposit must be paid prior to the license hearing
and,before the council considers the application. No investigation
fee shall be refunded.
The City -Council may grant or deny license applications
in its sole discretion. After",published notice, a public hear-
ing will be held concerning each original license application
and each renewal application.
With certain limited exceptions, no license may be
transferred from place to place or person to person without
complying with the requirements of an original application.
Certain persons are ineligible for licenses. A complete
list of such persons is set forth in Section 9 of the Ordinance.
Certain places are ineligible for licenses. A complete list
of such places is set forth in Section 10 of the Ordinance.
All licenses are subject to certain conditions regarding
operation of the licensed premises and, other matterp. These
conditions are set forth in Section 11 of the Ordinance.
Section 12 of the Ordinance delineates the hours during
which intoxicating liquor may be served or sold.
Certain additional restrictions are imposed upon the sale
of intoxicating liquor to or in guest rooms of hotels by
Section 13 of the Ordinance. Section 15 of the Ordinance sets
forth several restrictions involving minors. Section 16 places
additional restrictions on the purchase and consumption of
intoxicating liquor.
Applicants for intoxicating liquor licenses must file
a surety bond and a liability insurance policy with their
application. Section 17 sets forth rules and requirements
regarding such bonds and insurance policies.
Section 18 sets forth the procedure pursuant to which,
and the grounds upon which, the City Council may suspend or
revoke any intoxicating liquor license.
Any person who works as a manager, bartender, cocktail
waitress, clerk, delivery person or in any other capacity at
a premises licensed under this Ordinance must apply for a
license to engage in such business within seven days after
being first employed. Other restrictions and requirements
concerning the licensing of employees are set forth in Section'19
of the Ordinance.
Any enlargement, alteration or extension of the licensed
premises must be reported to the City Clerk prior to or con-
temporaneously with the application for a building permit,
and the licensee shall further provide the City with certain
information required by Section 20 of the Ordinance.
No more than six "On -Sale" licenses, two "On -Sale Club"
licenses, and six "Off -Sale" licenses shall be in existence
at any one time.
Any person violating any provision of the Ordinance may
be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction may be punished -
by a fine of not more than $500.00 or imprisoned for not more
than ninety days or both, plus the cost of prosecution in any '
case.
MM
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
Anistrator August 21, 1984
TO: Mayor, City Council, City
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Designation of Election Assistant
-,''-;INTRODUCTION
The Primary -Election will be conducted in three weeks (September 11th) and
we are now intensely involved in preparing for it. One very important item, in
my estimation, must be addressed prior to the election, that item being the
designation of a Deputy Clerk for Elections.
DISCUSSION/HISTORY
For the past decade -plus, the Deputy Clerk has functioned as the "second -in -
command" for elections, and because of the official title, had been authorized to
sign official documents and function as the primary election official if the need
arose. The role (and title) of the deputy was particularly significant in 1974
when the former Clerk was physically incapacitated on the General Election day
and could not perform his duties. It is extremely important that someone be both
fully trained and authorized by Council to assume the City Clerk's role in the
election process should the need arise.
Mary Ann DeLaRosa is the City's Deputy Clerk. Many or all of you may know
that Mary Ann is still recovering from injuries sustained in a recent automobile
accident and will maintain a half-day work schedule for at least the next ten
days. She has indicated to me that she feels she will not be capable of handling
the rigors or hours required of the deputy on election day, and certainly she
could not be trained or prepared to function in that capacity given her half-time
status. Designation of another staff person is therefore not only appropriate,
but, in my opinion, imperative.
Diane Ward, Engineering Secretary, was of significant assistance in the 1982
elections. She also, at her own initiative, has spent a considerable amount of
effort during times when engineering activities were slack over the past two
years revising election forms, assisting in training manual revisions and
organizing details for the upcoming election processes. Both her assistance with
these tasks and the knowledge she has gained over the past two years have been
invaluable to me in preparing for the 1984 elections. She has participated to a
large extent in a recent election judge training session and will lead similar
sessions before September 11th.
I believe that Diane would be a superb assistant and, if the need arose,
could function very effectively as the primary election official. Diane is not
only capable and competent, she has also shown the very necessary interest and
enthusiasm in learning the election process.
Election Assistant
Page 2
I have discussed .!i.t1hf..: y h :r X11 Diane and both concur that
Diane should serve in the deputy's capacity. In my discussion with Mary Ann, we
further concluded that it would be appropriate for Diane to retain the deputy
capacity for the General Election, since the experience gained in preparation for
and administration of the Primary Election is essential to the General Election
process.
By way of additional information to Council, Diane has agreed to accept the
additional responsibility with the full understanding of how rigorous election
day processing is, how great the demand will be on her own personal time, and
with the knowledge that I would not be recommending any additional compensation.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend to the Council without reservation or hesitation that Diane Ward
be appointed Deputy Clerk for Elections for the 1984 Primary and General
Elections.
ACTION REQUIRED
Council motion to appoint Diane Ward as Deputy Clerk for Elections.
trTi
I
i
PROPOSED HWY 40
F
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
David Todd RwyaT
& Associates, hu-
AzcW*cftlPta.xn
YpwstPtd, Min
YORKTON
BUSINESS
CENTER
riMOOTA MCOOKM rr..
NORTH
u�
YORKTOP JSINESS CENTER
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
PLAN DATA -
MENDOTA
HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
TOTAL
PARKING
PARKING
BUILDING NO.
TYPE
STORIES
SQ. FT.
REQUIRED
PROVIDED
SITE - SQ. FT.
ACREAGE
A
Office
7
153,000
765
765
359,700
8.26
B
Conference
3
60,000
300
300
243,960
5.60
Center
C
Office
3
41,400
207
207
168,875
3.88
D
Office
2
22,800
114
114
120,105
2.76
E
Office
3
46,000
230
230
144,300
3.37
F
Office,
3
46,000
230
230
136,500
3.13
G
Restaurant
1
5,000
70
74
I
151,300
,
1.18
,
H
Restaurant
l
5,000
70
67
51,300
1.18
Pond & Creek
64,725
1.48
Access Road
29,400
.68
TOTALS
379,200
11986
11987
11370,165
I
31.45
96 ft.--->
9 6ft.--->
1`
60 ft. 123 ft. 60 ft.
143 ft. -4
96 ft.
335 ft.
Pilot Knob Road
PILOT KnOB II
LOT SIZE: 349' X 500* = 174,500 S F.
BUILDinG AREA = 55,776 S F.
COVERAGE= 319X
210 PARKMG SPACES ( 1 PER 265 S Y.)
DEVELOPER: LinVILL ASSOCIATES
230 nORTH RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE
BURnsvxLLEJ.mmnEsoTAJ,W337
I&
l � ` � �!. � .
� = - �'' ` � - - _ -._J L: =�...
j Y NO� N itil: � �
�.�.�.��.� �\\ \��� � \�\ � ; � „^—'�
/� -�-�,��\�`\1\ i � � ►
, �� ------- - _ ` \� _ .,;. _�-
; ---- �`� : ' ,� ��;'_ `�.
: ���- \ . � ` i,i�r i-�-wr
� � n cr
� � - � . i � i--"t
� � �. � �� �
� ��� ll�� ��,Mb
� lii _`\ �\� � ,�� i
�:% \ � �� /li i
• � p � \ �� �\ � � � ` ��
� � c� �: �.�, ,� ;,. � �
� �\ 1 �� �� 1i� �♦ � _\�\
C �_ ` \ � `_ \"'� _f= ']i �� \ �5' �� � � �
� `\\ __ _ � 'l I \\\ 1 `\ \\ \\ `J,'I
�> I � \ ♦ 1
� ` ` '� \�\'' , '1 � '_ � ! \� _ —J
I` __�` \� \ 1 l \ \ �i - �`_� 'Yd
_ � ' `; � \ \\ ; 1� `1 � �
�_�� � � � �
' - \ ' ' \ \ � \�� \ � �� \�\ � �� `�� '� --'' � � ,-tu
- ��--- �\�\�\`\\ a#�\� � �� � � ' , ` :
� � ` ��`\�\�� \ � \ �� i 1 � i __ � �i ___-�i,
� " � `� �`�� . �\ � � � � ` I � J / .' �� �----' �b�
i � �� `\�` ��` `\\\ �\� 1 1 i � � i , _-���� i
� � �` �1 \ ` i�/�' \
/^ �� ` " -•����� ��l \,\��� `� \__: :�i �i i _�� \� � 1 \\ '__
� �/ �, 1 \` _ �``` \� ���� ��� \ �-�'.-�� � f ���\�� \�� %�
� ' .\ � � .� ��.����� �= _ ___ X/j ��`;; � ,,,�L'1
� ' �.' ` � �` � ��\l� � --'-_- r, -- -- .��
�� , ��� �\�� � �i11i ` , �''----i�' -� : -- =:n�
� ` __ \) `�i i ������ �-- =� � �� i' , \� _ __-�w
� � � �\��\ �� \ �\ �} � ( _ r
( ., �\ \�; ;` \ \\ \` ` �-� � �` �"` -- �
-.� � 1 ) � � \ � �� �� ` �
�_ _ � `� � • : � '`� \ `, � �. � `� �\ � = «r
� ' -' ,,-� ,\ � � , � 1�\�, �` �� �� �� , �� �� � i
� . � ,�, �._ ���� `.\,,\,,� �\,
�-- . �_ -�, � � �� � \ • `-' } � I�; ; nw
� �� �� ` �i � I � �� ♦ �� � �_ / � i � �i
I '_•��\\ ��\ ��`��\` �\i• �1\ \ ��\\��\ \Y-�%�:. �i yi
�\
�i/ �\ .\ 1 �� . � � '--''�.i' ' i1il
r, ----. , .,, ,,��, '�; �,, ��,'�. � __,,-;- ; ; : -
�; ' ,--.\ ' - _ �\ � ` : � � `, /; i , __ � �
� \ � �� � � � , ,
�i � ` `-- `� ` � ;�\ � .I � � � `r' i / � . � ;
� � (, �� �
��` ��', / `. ` � �;/ , �,;.
1 '` ��� ���` 1-� i� ': �'��
i � ` � �`��`�� - �-- ': � ' i�i
Il, i� �- ` `\��` \�� \\ �\\ 1����/� , __ ,I / / i�^ '1� ��`,
� � i � \�� ��� i J j � `\` / ��� �.� `� ��\ ����►
( ( � • �� j % i j �-'��/' — � � i� � � �� �\`�N
,�'. � � i /
��`` t \ I I� i i� i,' ���' i� 1 1�� ~�
\�` `� \� i ���'� � � �' /�i� % I
.� \ `; �```� � 1` I \ �� �
, l� � ,---, , � � , . ; ,
1, �',��,�,�, ��;;, , ; � ;) � -� ; �, �__;„
, \ , `, � � �, !♦ � � ..v
� �i' `� �� \�.' � `�� �`� � 1� �� i � 1 I � ) � / __�r
} ' ' = ' , ,++
_ _ ` `� �� `\` `�� �3\`\� ;\\ / / � � / � � � _'__/ iiL►
� I ��I\� i��`��Vd���� _'_/ / � .�"_; / /
% !��}iii�`.\�. , ' '--- �
/ ��. � ���� � „~;� � 'i�r��-
. 1t ��� � �� `.�.�` - �i �.
� � ''� �1 =_==�= �.
,--=, ' . . . _ � -_--
� `� � �
7i \�� �1 � � �
�
Z
�
�
:
�
�;
3rw3nv raiorax� �
W
V �o O
Q N �D
ll.J
� � �
U
Q
H
� o �
O � °�
� Q� M
� � �
u M N
F—
cn
�
vw
Z � �n o
� o
Q � I� M
a. a-
�
C7 W
Z�
Y� � o
Q � (� M
� �
, O O
J �.. o O
Q� o 0
I-- M O
� Q � �O
�.. (n —
�
W
O 1� M
�
N
CO �D t� M 00 00 CO OD tn
CO f� M — — — � �D �'
M N M M — — — � —
M
�n �n o 0 0 - o �n o �n
r� o 0 0 0 o c� o �o
CO — M ul M_ M I� � —
00 O �' � — — �' o� O
�O N �' M t!5 u1 �O N i�
— _ —. — c�'�
r� � o o � �
O — M t^�') t� �O
N — N N
r� � o 0 0 0
O — c'7 M � I�
N — N N
O O O O O O
� co 0 0 0 0
N �O �D V1 U1
� N �' �
M N M C`') — —
� �— �--
U � �
�
� � � �
L N dj � N � � � � �
� U �. .� U U U U ,�,,, ,F
C C
� v�-. O N v�— 4�-. � 4�-. � �
O DU O O O O � LY
O
L
�
� Q m
J
��
i:�
.
•�
O
0
N
�
�
M
�
�' -n
� o
'- o
U �
� � J
N a
� U �"
U 0 W Il.. �7 = � Q �
��� � ���� €
-� �
. w r ;
� � p� �
. � r � �-� �
� .. �
� �
. � � � �'
� � �
��� �� ��aa=� � e���
� � �� _
� k � � � �� � � ��;� �.
� � ���€ '��.,�` � '° w�
� �`� Y�
�� � �
.,��' � --� � � �.
� � � y � ���
� ��� � ��. � ,
� � � � �
v ��' � �
� � ��
� � �`:�
a � � � � �
;^�.`,�w — ,§ �Z' � �'
.3.� � � : � "C-. '.: >
.
z.
w w : s9
� � .. �h�... � .„�*�'� . � �"�� +�. � .��� �
��
r
� -~ �
�,
,
a _ , �. . � �, �� _.,.. _� _
. _ �.. .�.� �Y�..r. ,.„�
� ; �
. .. ,3s':-� `�m t ...
� ��
��
�:� ��
�
� 'I
�� � . � .K+'; � u�
�yw� .j
y�i�
+�y.� . -,, {I
.1� �J
fr�
��9
� .
� _
�
#✓ � � ��
5
�' _,�-�Y � s �G
* � � � .
a=
�� � "'�� Y� �
��� ,. _ � ��b��
,� ;
�
'�`' 1 � 3 �t: ; :
. o
96 ft.
� 3�5 f#.
�
�
�it�t i�t��� ����
� �� �
� � �
� .�
�, �
� ■' �,
4 �
_ ,
2
�
7
o SUGGESTE
� SWA9 E
4
il�— EXISTING STORM �
� � 1�
CB �
Ce "'"�' � FARMDALE ROAD �
o� J- ce o
D — a
= o
�
�
�
EXISTING WOOD �
_ WA �L w
8 �I U
II �'
�
e �� ` \ 2 �
� , � �� 3
� I� �� � �
� � � i
_ _ J _ _ _
z
3
_ _ _ ' I � I I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � / / / �
I II I I � �
� I I I � � �
9 � � � �3 i � ' � 6
i I� ; � � i / ,
I i ��
� CBII � � � ,� �
----------� � -- — — ----� �— ----' L---— --- ----
I��CB���I ���._
� ,
I I
I \\ — — /I � �./
L � �J \
/
� �
�
� —
� �
/
/
/ LO W AREA
. `
�._
~� /
� � /
4
;
�
;
--- --!
_ _ _ _ _ _�
� I
I
�� 5 ,
- � VACANT LOT �
�
— --- — -- — — ---�
�
POMb
PROPOSED
DITCH ON
PROPERTY LINE
W
�
DRAINAGE —�
� O �
I �
� EXISTING
---1, ��18'� CUI.VERT
'�- -�
� I
I
I I
i �
� LOWER COLONIAL DRIVE
� �
� j
I I
�
� � I
I
I
I
"oRTH SCALE
I'� l00'
CHERRY HILL 2 nd ADDITION
SURFI�CE WATER DRAINAGE
� CITI�" OF ?�TENllOT.1 HFIGHTS
7�(I ti��uth F'I.ii�i l�riv� �ti1en��n�i f leiehl��, Vlinne��,t.i
0
i
�
rn
�
� � , �: -
N �► �D � ,�; �.
� i r �`, '
�t' .
� N � �? '\ � � N I
Q� � � � � '
� � �` �', , ' � � � ,
� � / -� � � � �. � � i
� ' , ;' ,.'' � � ' � ;:� -{- o co
/ � } � �� I �'' ~ � o � �
�\ � � � \ � ��,� k � p
I � � � �� I�'?i � ln m o �
� / � � _ �` � i Qj � � :� ` �
I � � . -t _-� �0 � w o ,
r ; � ``' ' � Z Z �
� � 1 ( � I ' `� " � � � � i
. � / \ , `�� ' i
; " � � i � � ,
1 / / • ' � � � � = y"y� ,.:�j � � __ � �
� � '� � �.: \ � n.. . \
� � � o � `��i��� ;3� � �- L
/ � � � � � {' .
. � ` r � � .. ,r:r — :",.r �� .t. .
! �. . � .. . . ` "� ../� � .� 1+ 'T,,k..i.r
` ( ` . . � � 'W"`��b tr^.f,� �' , ;
� � � ! ,`� • _ � �"'y �ti � � i
. � � / - .�v�,.�:�-� "� L� � �`� 7� �►
, � � . r � /-�. , � . � I ,_ ' \ ` \ `` � �`J' � \
/ � ` � �
� � � �
/ / ' \ � � , , � •�/�
t / . - � \ I � � � ��� � � �P � �
, ---- - � � I � �. C�`
y; � f ,� • , . \ ! \ L J � , ,
/� - - �I � '
�<\ ' / x , i � \ . \ � � .
'`f � __ p .�. .,, ' , � �\
� � .�„ p� , ` `� � I
� %� � � �j 3 ` , ` � � �
1 ;��/ - � � Vj W
° ' , z v . � Z ;
� %� '�b� � � ; ` �
, � � / ' ` . . \,� f -� � 1
�.
- � � �. \
;` � I ` '� � �
/� 9 � - - - - - - � _ _ � " � '1 \ '
: 2 ` �
i -_ , , �
/ . ,� -- -- _ � 1 � i � C� I
% � � `' I i , ! � Qi
1 �/ �`~ � \ y � I / / / I
./ � - t I �
` � � - ` ' .\ _- � _ _ --� �
% ; f.� � � � � � � � = � � �
� / . , i __ - ', �, \
. _ j.,: ;' � . / � Q . _ �c- ' �
�',p � � " _ - - �
: �,, '� � i . . \� /� � _ �—_ � � \ I
;, 5 ,� / � �J � � \ ,
„ i:: � � i �_ ��
K � �✓ � — — — —._ ! �" - — _ .� r , �y —_.
� - � , CU
, ; �� �,�< �� '_ --" � � \ � ���� i . - . \ � . Qi
� .:. _ _ ���—�� I \
� � r" --� � `� � i
�__ � _ - � � \ ,�, _��- �- -- -- . . _ t
. l .r !
�� -{ ' 1` �
-� -` `� SEMEN ` � � � ; .
� A ; , .
-�- � �R E i � � ,j ; . o
_— - - - ,� ,�- � , �,
— . ; " � n t�11TAR , , ,, ' „ , cv
�
� f ''�`
\ i�
:., ;,
� �
<
~� _�
--
i �
i
� �
,
� .i
,
/
\ '�
� �
` � �
� \
�
� �
- � _*� �
�
f
! t�
I �
, '�
! ,
� '
�
, �n
t •
/ .r. -' � ��,
� � � ` j ��: "� �. r.� .�� - , . - - - � � �
I � ` � � �� , , �
�»
/ �T:1 �e1r �� � �'*4,i. ' .' . , .` .
f x 4"��' �Y. � �.-1f.�� .� °� ,�-1� �
/ � � ,.''�s�' � � -�� '":<� .� wa: � \
/ / � �'�� �,quif�� � ` .1 � ��;� Q�� w�'�. . -� �
/ ' f�/41�7fq ..� r"•-
/ - �a.�__' '�+ ` �� . . �� � `"` .� Me� �,r ...
/ \ � � � /.. . , _ . . ..' ' . � � , � � � ` � �K. vv' �s^rh� � :p- .t. w
�;�y � � / � / � \ \ � ��', ;.w }�� a
� \ % � �, i ` � - � \ � � '" y �„ ,
x
/ \ ,_ '. ,
�
� �:" � \ ,,,� ,,
; ?'s. � � � � �
� / '�.�_. ' � , . . \ \ _ . ~ .
. - �i�� * ��� MJ � ' / � � �� . � ` •
�'' � . � � `
// y� ��; / � / � � — _ — \ ` ` �
/ �f' � � � ( ��
\ �
� ,.,i.� � \ �
�'= � � �
�,;. � � � � � �
` �e / �
�: � -
' � � l i'f �� �� ` ,
/ / � �
\ . ,�'�' � / / � \ � � � � � !� � �
/ �_ �/ \ � i �
� \ � �
�
. ~� � � � � 1 �
. .�� � / I i � -- � __ ` � � � \
, � \
� � � / \ \ \ �
� ` � � \ � � �
� � � � � \ �
� / / \
� \ \
�
� 1 / / � � \ \ \ \
1 % � �� � \
� � �
i � � \
� , �\ .
Q � � �
� � —� — — — _ � � \
� � — � 1 �
Li �� � ---�__`
�/ � , � � �
�/ / �� � � 1 j � ' /
0� � � �
1 � (
vh� �- � � i � � .
1 7� �-- —1 � � �� � �
� �— �. 1_� c � �
i � � ' � —X -�" `
i 1 � � � �- � . \
'�' � .- � �- � � � � �
i �
� � i i� � � � � /
\� � .
� "�i: �'x - � !
\ �.�' s
\ �
—�\ �
�\
�_ I \
� �
\ � �
\ I
� I
V J �
\ �
\� �\\
I�� \
� �
� �
\ \
cD
�
� Q�
i
i
.
--� -- — - — -
�
�
�
, �\ _
�/ / , \ �
/ / � / ' \ \ \ �
� � \ \
i / ` — '� —
� '�' / � � I= /� �' � _ � � \ �. � \ .
� � � � �
�� � � � � \ \ __�.� _
' � � � � -� '` 1 1
i , � � � T �
� —� � � � -� � � �`
ASEMEN�C �-�
_ .s��W�R_E _ �
W _�
`_ �,; �N��'A�� __-��,
� 30 _ . �
,
� --- \
� --
i) — .
�
� ,,� � � � \
. � I � �� �
,
�\ � � N o
� I N N � �
� � �
� 3
N , I