The URL can be used to link to this page

1984-04-17CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA April 17, 1984 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. - &O�� 2. Roll Call. - 0-10/� 3. Adoption of Agenda. - FO a � 4. Approval of Minutes, April 3, 1984 and April 10, 1984. 5. Consent Calendar - Q a. Acknowledgement of Fire Department monthly report for March. b. Acknowledgement of Treasurer's monthly report for March. c. Acknowledgement of letter from Mn/DOT regarding Mendota Heights Road stop signs. d. Approval of the List of Claims. e. Approval of the list of licenses. End of Consent Calendar 6. Public Comments - IIV- 011,e 7. Hearings and Bid Awards a. Case No. 83-02, Culligan -- Continuation of hearing on application for critical area revgt and subdivision. (See attachments.) - 4-4y. 7 -. 9:5- b. $'b. Feasibility Hearing Continuation of hearing on proposed improvements to serve Evergreen Knolls Addition and adjacent areas (See attached.) C. Bid Award Willow Springs Creek relocation.,Sattached tabulation and recommendation.) - lee 8. Unfinished and New Business a. Memo on Curley Addition bi cle trail. (S�ge,at the pr posed resolutions.) b. Request o aal of final plat• and building permit issuance Le n ton Hei'hhtss Ap=ment(dee at c ed megpo a�nda.) � c. Police �e t 1983 Annual Re o t. Chief Delmont will be present.) �,,,¢_�f% •+..�/ d. Memo on appointment of Fire Department officers. Agenda, April 17, 1984 8. e. Memo on Eco omic �ommission ment Committee. f. Memo on Planning appointment. +? g. Memo on appointment to Co munity Development Block Grant District Committee. h. Me�oneet lighting policy. �/ °Z '� .►u, 3� ,��', i �1`% i. Memo on 1984 Publ ks labor negotiations .. j. Memo on ani y, rsewer infiltration sealing. k. Memmo on l 84 Work Pro am. _ A A, 1. Memo on Mn/DOT request for letter of endorsement on Dodd Road FAU funding. — 6� m. Memo on T.H. 110 Traffic Control Signal Agreement. n. Memo on 1984 summer help., o. Memo on 1984 street sweeping. p. Memo on moving expense. q. Memo on registrations for League of Minnesota Cities annual conference. yyte • 9. Council Comments and Requests. 10. Adjournment. C11 L n. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator April 17, 1984 SUBJECT: Agenda Amendments for April 17, 1984 Council Meeting The following changes and additional pieces of information are provided for the agenda. 3. Adoption of Agenda As discussed below, it is recommended that the agenda be adopted with the deletion of Item 8d. - Appointment of Fire Department officers. 7c. Bid Award - Willow Springs Creek relocation The d6veloper, Jack Callahan, is not prepared to commit to the cost of the project at this time. Therefore, this item should be tabled to May 1, 1984. 8d. Appointment of Fire Department Officers The Council action recommended in the staff memo was conditioned upon receipt of a letter of resignation from Chief Noack. The Chief has indicated that prior to submitting that letter, he wishes to meet with the Council to discuss his resignation. Therefore, it is recommended that Council delete any action on this item from this evening's agenda, and following adjournment of the regular meeting, agree to meet with Chief Noack in the Engineering Conference Room. KDF:madlr Respectfully submitted, Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator Page No. 1996 April 3, 1984 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, April 3, 1984 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City C of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Lockwood, Councilmembers Hartmann, Mertensotto and Witt. ADOPTION OF Councilman Hartmann moved the adoption of the amended agenda for the AGENDA meeting. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 APPROVAL OF Councilman Mertensotto moved approval of the Minutes of the March 19th MINUTES meeting. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilman Hartmann moved approval of the consent calendar, with the exception of Item 6d, Memo on Mendakota Sound wall, as submitted and recommended for approval as part of the regular agenda, along with authorization for execution of all necessary documents contained therein. a. Acknowledgement of the Code Enforcement Officer's monthly report for March. b. Acknowledgement of the minutes of the March 13th Park and Recreation Commission meeting. c. Acknowledgement of a letter from Mn/DOT regarding the status of the Mendota Interchange project. d. Acknowledgement of the Engineering Status Report for March. e. Approval of the List of Claims dated April 3, 1984 and totalling $113,446.00. f. Approval of the issuance of a Cigarette License to George's Golf Range. g. Approval of the list of Contractor Licenses, granting licenses to: Ory Bakke Insulation, Inc. General Contractor License Page No. 199% April 3, 1984 Kuehn Excavating Rohl and Timm Excavating Sherman Energy Contracting Patio Enclosures, Inc. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Excavating License Excavating License General Contractor Licens General Contractor License PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Vince Anderson, 1062 Cullen Avenue, asked for information on the status of the bicycle trail proposed a number of years ago to connect the Curley Addition to the Rogers Lake Park. Staff was directed to prepare a report for the April 17th Council meeting. EVERGREEN KNOLLS Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpose of the continuation FEASIBILITY of the March 6th public hearing on proposed improvements to serve the STUDY Evergreen Knolls Addition and adjacent areas. Mayor Lockwood turned the meeting over to Public Works Director Danielson for a review of the proposed improvements. Public Works Director Danielson reviewed the March 6th Council discussion. He stated that at that meeting, staff had notified the Council of the concerns expressed by the owners of property along Wachtler Avenue (extended) relative to the potential assessments for the proposed improvements and the possibility that substantial deferments might be requested. At the March 6th meeting, staff had recommended that Scheme A, Phase I of the proposed project be modified to delete the portion of Wachtler Avenue extended which would se - the Slowinski and Par 3 properties. At that meeting, the Counc expressed concern that Phase I construction did not include completion of Evergreen Knoll to Dodd Road and directed that staff study the possibility of rough -grading Evergreen Knoll from the proposed termination point in Phase I to Dodd. Mr. Danielson stated that it has been determined that it would be feasible to construct the phasing without extending Wachtler to Trail Road under Phase I. He informed the Council that the only affected property owner who is opposed to the project is Virgil Christoffersen. Staff has met with the Christoffersens, explained the project in detail, and suggested that they request assessment deferment at the time the assessment hearing is conducted, if the project is approved. He stated that staff has studied the possibility of staged construction of Evergreen Knoll and continues to recommend that construction be as recommended in Scheme A of the feasibility study. He stated that because of drainage and utility installation problems it would not be feasible to extend utilities to Dodd at this time and that rough grade construction of Evergreen Knoll to Dodd Road would not be cost effective at this time. Councilman Mertensotto expressed concern that property owners on Wentworth Avenue immediately north of the plat had not been notified of the hearing. He was particularly concerned that access to the south half of those properties would be limited if the project completed as proposed and if the property owners become desirous subdividing their properties in the future. Page No. 1998 April 3, 1984 Public Works Director Danielson stated that staff had been in contact with the property owners during the platting process and none of them expressed interest in future subdivision, in fact, several were adamently opposed to providing east -west access at the south end of their properties. He advised the Council that some of the properties could be served from the cul-de-sac in the future. Councilwoman Witt was -concerned about the lack of east -west access to Dodd and also: that all of the proposed street names begin with "Evergreen." Public Works Director Danielson stated that Mr. Gryc, the plat developer, has petitioned for construction of the east -west access to Dodd, and that it will be completed under Phase II. He stated that he will work with the developer on changing the name of the cul-de-sac. Mayor Lockwood asked for questions and comments from the audience. Mr. Lyle Lewis, 760 W. Wentworth, stated that there were several meetings held during the platting process which the majority of the property owners attended and had an opportunity to voice their opposition or approval of the planning proposals. The plan proposed by staff is the one the majority of the owners agreed to. He stated that the Wentworth Avenue property owners are aware of what is proposed in terms of access. Mr. Virgil Christoffersen asked for an explanation of the City policy of assessing corner lots. In response to a Council question, Mr. Gryc stated that someone is interested in acquiring almost all of the lots in Phase I. He further stated that he will most probably petition for the balance of the public improvements (Phase II) to be completed in 1986. There being no further questions or comments, Councilman Mertensotto moved that the hearing be continued to April 17th and that staff be directed to notify the property owners adjacent to Wentworth Avenue, east of the Lyle Lewis property, of the hearing continuation. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 LEGISLATIVE State Representative Art Seaberg was present to discuss legislative ISSUES matters, in particular, the Local Government Aid, pay equity and Industrial Revenue Financing issues. CAWARD On behalf of the City Council, Mayor Lockwood presented a plaque of PRESENTATION appreciation to retired Councilman James P. Losleben for his eleven years of service on the City Council and three years of service on the Park and Recreation Commission. COUNCIL Mayor Lockwood informed the audience that ten eligible residents had APPOINTMENT submitted letters expressing interest in appointment to the City Council. He informed the audience that two of the candidates had advised him of their inability to attend the meeting: Mr. Carl Cummins could not attend because of illness; Mr. Richard Spicer is vacationing in Europe. The remaining eight candidates were each invited to make Page NO. 1999 April 3, 1984 brief oral presentations. Mrs. Janet Blesener, Mrs. Dorot McM.onigal, Mr. John Roszak, Mr. Robert Leffert, Mr. Stuart Henning,Dr. Robert Altman, Mr. Russell Wahl and Mrs. Jeannette Rivers each spoke briefly. Mayor Lockwood stated that�xselecting one person�.out of ten excellent !WP6 ndidates4s^sext�:emelLy-d -iftficult,,_ "He,. stat, dP Fhat.l he tlieleives.,that C the person appointed should have sufficient residency; and be experienced in matters of governance in Mendota Heights, and above all, should be someone who can take hold of the work which must be done week in and week out, work with staff and be someone the balance of the Council would be comfortable with. He also felt that the nomination should have unanimous Council support. After additional comments, Mayor Lockwood nominated Janet Blesener for appointment to the Council seat vacated by James P. Losleben. He felt that Mrs. Blesener could become quickly acclimated to Council procedures because of her experience on the Planning Commission. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Councilwoman Witt supported the nomination, noting Mrs. Blesener's experience on the Planning Commission and her employment as an architect. Council Members Hartmann and Mertensotto both indicated that while they could support the appointment of several of the candidates, they would support Janet Blesener's appointment. Mayor Lockwood moved the adoption of Resolution No. 84-17, "RESOLUTION OF APPOINTMENT TO CITY COUNCIL POSITION," appointing Janet Blesener immediately begin serving the balance of the unexpired Council tee... vacated by James P. Losleben. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Janet Blesener. Mayor Lockwood directed that the letters from the remaining candidates be placed in the Commission application files, and asked that the nine candidates consider accepting future Commission appointments. JOINT MEETING The Council acknowledged a memo from the City Administrator recommending that the date for the joint Council/Park Commission meeting be changed from April 17th to April 10th. The Council concurred in the recommendation. RIVERWOOD PLACE Councilman Hartmann moved the adoption of Resolution No. 84-18, "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR RIVERWOOD PLACE." Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Abstain: 1 Blesener WILLOW SPRINGS Councilman Mertensotto moved the adoption of Resolution No. 84-19, DRAINAGE "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING WOr- IMPROVEMENTS DONE BY DAY LABOR TO SERVE LOT 2, WILLOW SPRINGS ADDITION (JO. CALLAHAN) (IMPROVEMENT NO. 83, PROJECT NO. 6)." Page No. 2000 April 3, 1984 Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Abstain: 1 Blesener LEXINGTON The Council acknowledged a letter from the Dakota County Highway HEIGHTS Engineer confirming that the County would be satisfied with a APARTMENTS dedication of 50 feet of right-of-way (Lexington Avenue) on the Lexington Heights Apartment plat, along with a memo from the Public Works Director indicating that previous plats contiguous to Lexington Avenue have dedicated 50 feet of right-of-way. Mr. James Riley, the plat developer, stated that a 50 foot dedication is agreeable to him if the ten foot trail dedication is included within the 50 feet. Mayor Lockwood stated that if the trail can be worked into the right- of-way, Mr. Riley's proposal would be fine. He pointed out, however, that if it appears more prudent to place a trail outside of the right- of-way, a trail easement will be required. In response, Mr. Riley stated that he would give the City an easement in the future if a trail cannot be placed within the right-of-way. It was the concensus of the Council that a 50 -foot right-of-way dedication on the final plat would be acceptable on the basis that Mr. Riley will give a future trail easement if it is needed by the City. JOINT Councilman Mertensotto moved approval of a Joint Purchasing Agreement PURCHASING with the City of Saint Paul, authorizing execution of the agreement by the appropriate City officials. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Abstain: 1 Blesener EQUIPMENT Councilwoman Witt moved approval of the purchase of a tandem trailer for the Public Works Department from Carlson Equipment for the pur- chase price of $3,247.00. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Abstain: 1 Blesener C SUMMER HELP The Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from the Public Works Superintendent recommending that three youths employed as summer help in 1983 be rehired for the 1984 summer season. Mayor Lockwood felt that the City should provide an opportunity for work experience for City youth and should hire new people each year. Councilman Mertensotto agreed that it would be unfair to rehire the same people when many City youths are desirous of work experience. Mayor Lockwood moved that a summer youth work program be established Page No. 2001 April 3, 1984 and that one of the objectives of the program be to provide woi experience to City youths, with a further determination that there be no repetition of employment in future years. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 1 Witt .Ab=stain: `1 Blesene,r t- xT. PUBLIC ADDRESS The Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from the City Clerk relative to the acquisition of a public address system for the Council Chambers. It was the concensus of the Council that while there is a problem when the Chambers are crowded, utilization of the system would be minimal for the cost involved, and therefore acquisition of a system is not warranted at this time. SOUND/SAFETY Councilman Mertensotto and Public Works Director Danielson reviewed a WALL drawing and reported on the conclusion of negotiations with._Mn/DOT on construction of a sound/safety wall and berming along the 4th tee at Mendakota Country Club adjacent to I -35E. ECONOMIC Mayor Lockwood acknowledged a letter from Mr. Bill Escher, Chamber of DEVELOPMENT Commerce Executive Director, expressing his appreciation for City participation in financing for the National Development Council economic development training seminar and suggesting formation of a Mendota Heights Economic Development Committee. Councilman Hartmann and Administrator Frazell were appointed to serve as a steerir committee to determine the need and objectives for such a committee. MISCELLANEOUS Councilwoman Witt reported on NDC -4 activities. Mayor Lockwood reported on a meeting with School District 197 and City of West St. Paul representatives relative to school board concerns over the disposition of the Grass Jr. High School sports complex. In response to a question from Councilman Hartmann, Public Works Director Danielson reported that a policy recommendation on load limits is being prepared for future Council consideration. CLOSED SESSION The Council acknowledged and concurred in a recommendation from Administrator Frazell that a Closed Session of the City Council be conducted immediately after adjournment for discussion of Public Works labor negotiations and a report from the City Attorney on the Krajniak Ceasement matter. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Lockwood moved that the regular meeting be adjourned to 8:00 P.M., April 10th for a Joint Council/Park Commission meeting, and that in accordance with the provisions of the Open Meeting Law, the Council meet in a closed session immediately following the vote on the adjournment motion to discuss Public Works labor negotiations and ty Krajniak easement matter. Ayes: S Nays: 0 ATTEST; Robert G. Lockwood Mayor C, Page N0. 2002 April 3, 1984 Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:21 O'Clock P.M. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk Page No. 2003 April 10, 1984 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Special Meeting Held Tuesday, April 10, 1984 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the special meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at the City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Lockwood, Councilmembers Blesener, Hartmann, Mertensotto and Witt. KRAJNIAK It was immediately announced that the Council would convene LITIGATION in a closed door session to continue discussion on pending litigation regarding the Krajniak storm drainage easement. In addition to the Mayor and Councilmembers, City Attorney Tom Hart and City Administrator Kevin Frazell were also present, as well as Public Works Director Jim Danielson. i The closed door session was completed at 7:50 o'clock P.M. JOINT PARK & REC At 8:00 o'clock P.M., the Council convened in joint session SESSION with the Park and Recreation Commission. Commission Chair- person Jim Stein expressed appreciation to the Council for the joint meeting, and indicated that the purpose for the meeting was to ascertain Council interest in acquiring two large parcels in the City for development as community playfields, along with development of a bike trail system. Those parcels are the Wachtler property, and the School District #197 property. The group had some brief discussion about the need and feasibility of conducting a survey of community need and interest. City Treasurer Larry Shaughnessy then presented updated cost figures for acquisition of the two parcels, along with the tax impli- cations of bond issues of various sizes to fund the acquisitions and development of the bike trail system. Councilman Hartmann stated he felt the most important thing was to lock in a price on the Wachtler property, since it was the parcel that the City was most in danger of losing to private development. Park Commissioner Mary Jeanne Schneeman said that she had talked to a member of the Wachtler family, Mrs. Eileen Kennedy, who had told her that the family had no interest in selling at this time. Mayor Lockwood said that he thought the City should also look into the possibility of obtaining a formal first right of refusal on the School District property, although the School Board has indicated that they are not intending to sell the property in the near future. Councilman Mertensotto said that he thought it would be very Page No. 2004 April 10, 1984 difficult to pass a bond referendum on the general election ballot in the fall, given the high voter turnout. He also said he thought it was important to resolve any problems with the Wachtler family, since it would be difficult to pass a bond issue if it had a cloud over it that the landowners did not wish to sell'to the City for park development. It was decided that the most appropriate route would be for Mayor Lockwood and City Administrator Frazell to make more formal contact with Mrs. Kennedy, to express the City's interest in acquiring the property, and pointing out that this site had been designated as potential park development for a number of years in the City's Comprehensive Plan. It was also agreed that the Commission and the Council need updated cost figures for development of the two parcels once they are acquired. The Commission and Council then discussed'the need for ballf ields in the community. Park Department representative Terry Blum said that being a softball player himself, he could attest that if the fields were available they could probably be filled up every night. Councilwoman Blesener said that she felt development of the bike trail system was top priority, and she hated to see it tied to acquisition and development of the Wachtler property, in case the latter becomes difficult to acquire. City Administrator Frazell indicated that there might be other possibilities for funding bike trail development, since the Mendota Heights system probably ranked very well in competition for state grants, should the state program ever be funded. Treasurer Shaughnessy also indicated that the Park fund is estimated to soon have approximately $300,000 in fund balance. It was agreed that Mayor Lockwood and City Administrator Frazell would make further contact with the Wachtler family, that the City engineering department would give updated cost estimates for development of the Wachtler and School District sites, and that the groups would then reconvene to consider further steps. Councilman Mertensotto said he thought a professional needs assessment would be important in selling the bond issue. Public Works Director Danielson gave a report on a portion of a bike trail which had been developed by Mn/DOT in connection with the I -35E right-of-way. The bike trail currently runs from Rogers Lake Park along Wagon Wheel Trail up to a vacant lot in Curley's Addition, between Lexington Avenue and I -35E. The issue was brought up, because neighbors abutting the vacant property have recently asked if and when the City intends to complete the bike trail. Public Works Director Danielson said that the extra lot has been set aside and dedicated to the City as part of the plat for the Curley's development. He suggested that the City sell the lot 40 Page No.2005 April 10, 1984 for development, retaining an easement to complete the bike trail on through to public streets. The proceeds of the lot sale could be used for trail development. The Council and the Commission agreed that this would be a sensible use of the property, and would provide a good example in the community of what could be done for bike trails, to generate more enthusiasm for a parks bond issue. The Commission and Council also discussed the fact that this bike trail align- ment might be a potential alternative to expensive development of a bike trail along Lexington Avenue. Mr. Danielson indicated that the City engineering department is looking at that option. The meeting ended by a viewing of a parks bond promotional slide show program which was prepared by Howard Dahlgren and Associates for the City of Burnsville. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilwoman Witt moved that the meeting be adjourned. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ATTEST: Robert G. Lockwood Mayor TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:50 o'clock P.M. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk MENDOTA HEIGHTS MONTHLY FIRE D E P A 1611 E NT REPORT Fire Calls No. 84-25 Thru 84-40 Number of Calls 16 Month of March 119 84 FIRE ALARMS DISPATCHED TYPE I— Commercial Reside 4ia 1 Vehicle Fires Contract Fires(All) Vehicle Accidents I Rescue (no fire) NO. STRUCTURE CONTENTS MISC. TOTALS TO DATE 3 400 4,400 5 10 610 1 350 350 $ 400 $ 10 $ 350 Monthly Loss Totals Men .Htcts31 2 All Fires All Areas $ 360 $ 5,360 Grass, Brush&No Value False Ala?fn 'Criminal False " Commercial False " Residencial 3 Men Hgts Only Struct/Contents 5,010 Other Men Hgts Only Miscellaneous 350 16 Men Hgts Total Loss to Date $ 5,360 Good Intent Calls 1 TOTAL CALLS 16 LOCATION OF FIRE ALARMS To Date Last Yr. Mendota Heights 13 32 24 Mendota 1 1 Sunfish Lake 0 4 BILLING FOR SERVICES Agency This Month To Date Mn:DOT Milw RR CNW RR Others TOTALS $ Lilydale 3 6 4 Other 1 0 FIRE MARSHAL'S TIME FOR MONTH TOTAL 16 40 33 I Inspections WORK PTIRFORMED Hours To Date Last YE. Investigations Fire Calls 288 924 553_ Fire Calls Meetings 29 95 69 Drills 54 182 154 Meetings I Weekly Clean -Up 22 75 75 Drills, Training pecial Training 20 60 77_ Miscellaneous 37 Administrative 21 68 44 Fire Marshal 39 149 141 Total 39 TOTALS 473 1553 . 1113 Remarks: See other side of this sheet for monthly synopsis. SYNOPSIS OF MONTHLY RUNS . chimney fir s. Th de artment made 16 runs during themonth of March. Two runs were for chimney fires. .3th at 3 -% Ap Zrhe�rle were two calls for the rescue urmit to vehicle accidents. On March 13th at 3:32 am one spr n ler , to ere called to Economic Lab for water flow alarm. Responders found one sprinkler !etermin ,,�•,,a new C egad owing water. There was no fi e in the building, it could not be determined what c YS, d the head to trip. On March 20th the department was called to the new C G Ryan The Trice building at 945 Fiiway #13 wlbre three' 100# propane tanks were burning. The tanks :o have bolown ,pane i riit ed fueling a large,•heater inside thf,building, high winds are believed to have blown g a pel.dstic tarp causing the tanks to tip•ov eer. The resulting spill of propane ignited, causing the fire. There was no damag•,to=the structure. electri 1 fit d,t,} Vn Marc% 31st at 1:36 am the departme' esponded to Gould Battery for an electrical fire y in a compressor fuse box, the damage was about $400. W. f � - SYNOPSIS OF MONTHLY TRAINING ra Rhe firs be two hour monthly drill was split i to'two classes of one hour each. The first -cgeneraeobs7ect was a CPR refresher and the second hour was working with the self-contained reathing equipment. The monthly rescid class was used to drill with the generators and Lukas equipment.''- s r6 „ I" ♦ YK-:� • F,. 14 Te �f�4tl •r • , ♦• Y• ;.�y_yC • '11` YS�..A'{r: e. +•' � Yv.iilf+Y':Si - FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY WORK PERFORMANCE Month AlmecW-198.4 Calls for Month ,.ear Total Date Fire Calls Att'd Month Fire Calls Att'd Year Per- cent Att'd Year Clean Month- UP 1� Drill Hrs Hrs a Bus. Meet- ing Hrs Off'r Meet ing Hrs Spec, Drillt'y [Irs Other r_ ? C , . E v Hrs 5q0,4z Other Act' y Hrs Lero Noack. Chief ./.3 33 75' x 76 Dick Zwirn 7 22 Chief Admin Asst. MAAXRrrq Alm�KA Hrs Capt. John Maczko 1 57 1-2- 55 1 y Ipt. Jeff Stenhaug e' 1 ;57 7 Paul Dreelan72- Mike Coonan en Gordy Skjervj George Noack S ko x 4_ X x Gerald Nelson 3s - Lambert Derks Ed Adrian 13 ;K Ted Husnik Jamie Lerbs /0 Pat Knight Mike Maczko y ;K Allen Valencou 7 /Z Capt. Steve Carlsoni (,, 1 7-,l 6o Paul Maczko il 7 17 //3 Bill Chisler—L.':'— 70 /5 39 Marc Connolly .7- e 76 Dick Zwirn 7 22 5'5, George Lowe MAAXRrrq Alm�KA Ipt. Jeff Stenhaug e' 1 ;57 7 69 George Noack S tZ .7-3 Gerald Nelson 3s - Lambert Derks George Noack Jx /,Z Ted Husnik Jamie Lerbs /0 25 Mike Maczko /5 31? -4-1 Zo .Tnhn Neska -Z-2 Ken Noack Jo 7 JJML Kilburg 7 70 y x x Total Attended Tot. Man Hours This Month Last Month. Last Yea !r. RunsPerMan k. 6 / 4.,tier .MenPer Run6q— /{ • A? &Y-tu r Year 3 0 0 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TREASURER'S REPORT - MARCH, 1984 DAKOTA COUNTY STATE BANK Checking Account Savings Account C.D. Due Savings Certificates 9-27-84 @ 9.88% TOTAL Collateral - Bonds 320,000 Govt. Guar. 100,000 CHEROKEE STATE BANK C.D. Due 7-30-84 @ 9.17 400,000.00 C.D. Due 7-07-84 @ 9.357 300,000.00 C.D. Due 6-04-84 @ 9.257 125,000.00 Savings Cert. 9-3-84 @ 13,952.59 TOTAL Collateral - Bonds 1,300,000 ® Govt. Guar. 100,000 MINNESOTA FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN C.D. Due 9-12-84 @ 10.157 Collateral,Govt. Guar. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ST. PAUL C.D. Due Collateral - Bonds -.- Govt. Guar. 100,000 U.S. TREASURY BILLS Balance $17,538.24 366.49 25,000.00 $42,904.73 838,952.59 100,000 Due 3-21-85 630,000,(AM) (10.60) $568,375.60 9-13-84 700,000 (1st) (10.20) 666,345.17 5-17-84 425,000 (Dk) 406,611.67 11-01-84 850,000 (Dk) 777,257.71 Repo 4-9-84 225,000.00 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $3,625,447.47 Collateral $420,000 1,400,000 100,000 100,000 L. Shaughnessy 01,�%NESpTq 114 a stir�� OF T;0 Minnesota Department of Transportation District 9 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Box 2050 North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 April 3, 1984 Mr. James Danielson Director of Public Works 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 Dear Mr. Danielson: SUBJECT: S.P. 1985-76 & T.H. 149 Detour Mendota Heights Installation of 78 (I-494) Rd. at Lexington Ave. Stop Signs Telephone. 779-1121 This is to confirm Mr. Bruce Hall's March 14, 1984 phone conversation with you regarding the installation of stop signs at the above referenced intersection to remedy the sight problems. Traffic volumes may double through this intersection when Mendota Heights Road is established as a detour route for T.H. 149 approximately May 1, 1984. As you are aware, the sight distance at the intersection of Lexington Avenue and Mendota Road is restricted by a hill in the northwest quadrant. Plans are being worked on to improve the sight distance. However, because of utility problems, plans will not be completed soon. Stopping Mendota Heights Road should work satisfactorily as a temporary solution during the time traffic is being detoured. All signing and markings would be installed and maintained by Mn/DOT. Our construction and maintenance engineers should be contacting you to discuss detour maintenance responsibilities on Mendota Heights Road between T.H. 55 and T.H. 149 and for a possible field review. It is anticipated the detour will be removed and T.H. 149 opened to traffic prior to the winter months. If there are any questions, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, MMicael L. Robinson, P.E. District Traffic Engineer An Equal Opporuuiilr Employer CITY OF "N.ENOOTA HEIGHTS 0-:17T. APR -0 6 1984 r T'd 60-Utilities APAIL 17, 1984 CLAIMS LIST 20-Police 70-Parks CHECK REGISTER 30-Fire 80-Planning 40-Code Enfc 90-Animal Control AMOUNT-.--- ITEM- DES C RIP-TI,DN -ACCOURT NO.-IN 21.78 CORCORAN 40WE PARTS 01-4330-490-100 ---CORC.ORXN,--HDWE ____.__. ___ .PARTS__5_05/5D.6 -_All !t.43.311a.- 49 OLOM 578,81 __MFS8tPLA.S.TI.C.__CO ____..._._2ODR._MAR.KERS___. 52*76 _.-LUNCItEONERAZELLMITI ... . ...... 27*50 Ale E14.1-B 0 PHI ES_ -,.,..---.P.LA.QU E - LO.SLE BEN--- 9-0- 11 O!t lia, 43*60 125ea0 FLOM TOOL CO WELDER 01-4305-070-7.'0 125,00 FLOM TOOL CO WELDER 15-4305-060-60 3 7S.O0 29,90 FIRE INST ASSN TRNG SPLYS 01-4403-030-30 _-.5,000 _.._________FIRE__T_NST _.ASSN_---._-____. _. -8-4 -.DUES.-.----. ___(11_--n_44D_4.nO30!r30. 34,90 *,/ 9-929-9-00L.- 83. F.()RD..LTD _____1.2.TA02_0:v-t000-00 9#299*00 .---1-3-* 2-0 _.WI,LLI.AR..LE'RBS..__ __.-MILEAGE. 34,89 WILLIAM LERBS MEALS FIRE SCHL 01-4490-030-30 48,09 ✓ 10*35 MINNESOTA BEARING CO PARTS GRINDER RPRS 01-4330-490-50 10.35 10*00 METRO COUICIL 4/30 MTG FRAZELL 01-4400-110-10 10000 METRO COU4CIL 4/30 MTG DANIELS04 05-4400-105-15 65*00 MENDOTA HEIGHTS FO PHOTOS&SPLYS 01-4305-030-30 639,60 NOVACK INC AMER LOGIBALL 15-4305-477-60 6394,AD ! 19250*00 BRTGGS&MO.RGAN RE SVC TAC 01-4220-000-00 24 *00 P C WORLD ONE YR SUBS 01-4402-110-10 17097 PERSONAL SOFTWARE 12 ISSUES Oi-4402-110-10 22*50 SO ST PAUL BEE LINE ALIGNMENT 2225 01-4330-440-20 2 2.5,0 33*24 ELIZABETH WITT LUNCHES FD INTERVIEW 01-4490-030-30 CHECK REGISTER AMOU-N-T.- _VE NDOA C -P AUSL _.-ITEM DESC_RIP_TION____, ACCOUNT NO* I -N-1 33P?4 01-4330-440-20 9,82 B&J AUTO SPLY LENSEE 01-4330-490-70 -81 .13 7.11 00 WATER :OMMISSION MAR SVC 2431 LE 01-4425-310-50 48900 CITY W ST PAUL MAR SVC 2431 LEX AIR TANKS 01-4305-030-30 48oOO RPR -HYDRANTS 15-433015-4330-480-,60 7*10 BO WATER -.OMMISSION MAR SVC 2431 LEX 15-4425-310-60 576*50 WEBER & TROSETH EQUIP FC VEH 12-4630-000-00 576.50 :_9�6 65.39 CITY MOTOR SUPPLY PARTS 2290 01-4330-460-30 38974 19077*41 FISCO 01-4330-490-50 CYL VALV AIRPACS 12-4630-000-00 693*82 FTSCO DISC PADS501 01-4330-490-'^ 31,88 CYL VALV AIRPACS 12-4630-000-00 01-4330-490- 214*02 */ - 135*00 NORELCO PREC SYS DICT MTCN AGREE 01-4330-490-20 30*55 ARNESON FUEL OIL SVC BAL DUE 2115 01-1215-000-00 u 2,072900 ARNESON FUEL OIL SVC REGULAR 01-1215-000-00 .- -_ 1.0,#0.0... --------_- _A R.NE S O -R -F U E L OI L SVC . .. .... BAL__0.UE_2_l._j4__. - ------ 01-12"15-00.0-00 29242,00 ARNESON FUEL OIL SVC NO LEAD 01-4320_020_20: 49454,55 _3.9.36_....._._.__..- A T I_T_..-lXF_O._ S,YS TJE MS-_ APR. -S. VC_ 4*91 AT & T INFO SYSTEMS 2ND GTR 24.27 0.1.!?421D-02V 01-4210-070 _14*5_3.__ __B&J_A,UTV__SPA.X_ ___ - __--MIS C -P AUSL 01-_4305-050-50- 54*78 5 B&J AUTO SPLY BULBS/SEAL BEAM 01-4330-440-20 9,82 B&J AUTO SPLY LENSEE 01-4330-490-70 -81 .13 7.11 00 WATER :OMMISSION MAR SVC 2431 LE 01-4425-310-50 7:11 BD WATER COMMISSION MAR SVC 2431 LEX 01-4425-310-70 226.10__-- -ED WATER C4r0jISSION______,_ RPR -HYDRANTS 15-433015-4330-480-,60 7*10 BO WATER -.OMMISSION MAR SVC 2431 LEX 15-4425-310-60 247,42 z i .__.____,w_.CITY._MOTOl_ SUPPLY --- --- TAPE/FLAP-S.0_1-.43_3.0-_44.Q-2.0'' :_9�6 65.39 CITY MOTOR SUPPLY PARTS 2290 01-4330-460-30 38974 CITY MOTOR SUPPLY PAINT/BULBS 01-4330-490-50 --oln-4330 - - 49.0-!1_0_' 22*05 CITY MOTOR SUPPLY DISC PADS501 01-4330-490-'^ 31,88 CITY MOTOR SUPPLY PARTS501 01-4330-490- 214*02 */ - CHECK REGISTER _AMQUffil__ ._ ..____..__. __.____. VEN003. _.____..___._.__LT_EM._DESCRIP.LION._,_________ _ACCQU.NT._NQ..-_LNI --.--CQA.ST.._�`O--_CQAST .__._ -_-- -_-__ HAMNER_.-_.. _......---.-.----_..---____01-5305-150-5fl_ 21.82 COAST TO COAST PAINT/BRUSHES 01-4305-070-70 1.38 COAST 110 COAST DROP CLOTHS 01-4330-490-50 -. -.-----.-�..�__-.-_-----_.C9A.SI __liQ__COA.ST_.____..____._..._._..GLUE._--- -------_-,__---------•----__._1.5-4.3A5--0�0-bp._ 42.91 �- 74.15 CONT=L CR CORP APR PYMT 01-4210-020-20 1.18, -6-5--- - __.._ -- -..---L 59.32 CQNTEL CR CORP APR PYMT D5-4210-105-15 252.12 +� -135-80-._ 156.00 DAHLGRIIN HOWARD ASSO RE PARK COMM MTG 10-4220-135-00 231,25 OAHLGRGN HOWARD ASSO RE DISP ACACIA PROP 16-4220-000-00 570 *-.2S 20.00 - - - - DAVIS EILECTRONI C SVC-- RPR- ONLY -- - - - - -- -01-4330-450-30 22.50 DAVIS ELECTRONIC SVC PARTS/REPAIRS 01-4330-450-30., --_._._OAV-IS_..E►LECSRONLC_-..SVC . ..... -BAT_TERIE.S.___----,-�--_--•------..�_1-§33D- 0-_31L - 56.00 DAVIS ELECTRONIC SVC PARTS/REPAIRS 01-4330-450-30 32.33 DAVIS fILECTRONIC SVC PARTS/REPAIRS 1-4330-450-30_ 01-4330-450-30- j .�1.5 j)AVZS__E.LEC.TRQNIC....S.Y..0 __...P._ARiS1REPAIR_5------------.---01-. .3_Q_ 24,05 DAVIS QLECTRONIC SVC PARTS/REPAIRS 01-4330-450-30 295*03 */ __19.23 _ _ _.._ ELVGR=.N...PAINT SUPPLY _.._ Q .D._ENAMEL-.._ 19.23 65,70 EXECUTONE SYSTEMS RPRS STA00 01-4330-490-10 _ 21 _, 99-.._ .. _._ _. E.XECUT.ONE - SYSTE..MS.._--. _- .__ RPR 8C LN_-D.IAL _ .._ .__ ___ 0-].-43 30 -49U -.z.0 87.60 +� 120.96 FORT ROAD HOWE GAS CANS/TURF PLUS 01-4305-070-70 127.69 ICMA RC 3/16 W/H _---- ----- 01-2072-000-00 79.33 ICMA RC 3/16 CONTR FRAZELL 01-4406-110-10 ?07.02 562,50 IDS LIFE INS CO APR PREM 01-2074-000-00 ' CHECK REGISTER AMOV.i1T _ _._ _VE.NDQR _.___._.. ITEM. DESCRIPTION___._. _. _ACCOUNT_.NQ*._ , 562.50 *- _ _ 635.00_..- _ -__--_ _-I-NSTI7UTIONAL-_S.ALES-._.-. CHAIRS .- -- _--__--- -...---------_-01-460p-11.0 635.00 *� 64.67 KAT KEYS SHOP DOOR LOCK 01-4335-310-M)l _ ...64.67_.__ KAT .KEYS.. _ .-SRQ.P_.DOOR LOCK 64,66 KAT KEYS SHOP DOOR LOCK 15-4335-310-6173 194.00 *� ..KNUTH... TQM --. 16.72 KNUTH TOM 27.48 +� MILEAGE THRU.-4/.1105-4.415.-_10.5-1��,. MILEAGE THRU 4/11 15-4415-477-6E0 _.23..17.__ ,_KULLA.NOlwg.._.GUY. _ MZ__THRU 4_/1.1- _ _ __ __ _, Q1-4.415-020-20 13.64 KULLANDER GUY MI THRU 4/1 01-4415-110-10.. 22.88 KULLANDER GUY MI THRU 4/11 01-4415-650-10 ..ML-THRU_ 4/1Z Q5-S4J5�_1.0s -� 7.04 KULLANDER GUY MI THRU 4/11 89-4415-814 3 74.21 +� _.LA_NGULl4_. HOWE _ _ _-- _--- CARB.__KIT.---- 17.34 LANGULA HDWE OIL DRY 01-4305-030-301 1.73- LANGULA HDWE MAR DISC 01-4305-030-30 3_.6Q---- -- -- L A.NGO.LE1 _ HD WE ------MAR. DISC _ _ - -.------01-43.35-05Q-50 _ 27.39 LANGULA HDWE MAILBOX 01-4305.050-5010 , 8.59 LANGULA HDWE NAPTHA 01-4330-490-50' ...59.3.4 8.50 LEEF BROS INC MAR SVC 01-4335-310-50; 8.50 LEEF BROS INC MAR SVC 01-4335-310-70'. 8.50 __ _. LEEF_ BROS ._INC _ _. __ MAR. SVC _. __. _ .__._ 15-43.35-310._-6.0 ' 25.50 *r 1 P103.57 LOGIS MAR SVC 0;1-4214-110-10.4 ___ 1.4_.3.5..___.____..LOGhS._.:._...__._ _ _ - _MAI LLN.G._LABLE S..__..._____.__.._.__.__._Q'f-4305_-020-20.J 628.03 LOGIS MAR SVC 15 -4214 -060 -AD I 19745.95 +� 280.00- M/A..ASSOCIATES _INC - _. WED_..KILL _ _.. _ ___.-. 01-4305-070-`7G_' CHECK REGISTER MOUNT.._ _ _ _ V-END01 _. _ ITEM. DESCRIPTION_ _ _. ACCOUNT._.NO...INVbi 280.00 *� --_57_.3.2._0____ ..... _....MEDCENl?ERS._.HP_.._ .OF_ REV.. ___ ...MMA _FUEL -TAX_.. 01-4320-050-50 MINN._.FIRE INC 817.05 MEDCENTERS HP APR PREM 01-4245-020-20 YA 391.15 MEDCENT'ERS HP APR PREM 01-4245-021-20 54 ._._.__..MEO.CENTERS _13P___.___ . - ...__._APR...P_REM.. 242.30 MEDCENnERS HP MAR PREM 01-4245-070-70 54 628.20 MEDCEN1tERS HP APR PREM 01-4245-110-10 YA _40500--------..__MEDC.ENL�RS _HP . _._ ._. _ -__ _MA R._PREM - -. .... _.___ _._05-4245_-.10.5-1.5.-54 135.00 MEDCENTERS HP MAR PREM 15-4245-060-60 54 39641.00 *, _ _.13..33 -._ ._. __. rEKD__HQTS .RUBBISH .__ MAR SVC. __ 01 -4240 -310 -SO 3; 13.33 MEND HGTS RUBBISH MAR SVC 01-4280-310-70 371 15,00 MEND HGTS RUBBISH MAR SVC 01-4280-315-30 22 _ _1.3..34.__..-__._ _.___..MEhD_HG_TS_. RUBBISH _. _ _ _._MAR SVC_ _ __ _ 15-42.80-310-.60 3'A 55.00 *� 62.40 MIDWEST SIREN SERV APR MTCN 01-4330-450-20 12 _....23..25 _.._ .____ --MIDWEST- SIREN _S.ERV _ APA . MTCN. _ _._...__._._._0.7_-4.33Q-.000-00 12 85.65 + 22.05 MINN BENEFIT ASSN _ -.5..9.0.._ __ . _MI.NN__BIINEF IT_ AS SN 5.00 MINN BENEFIT ASSN 32,95 ✓ 59 .38 . - - 59.38 120.87 _ 806.68 927.55 +v APR W/H 01-2074-000-00 __.___APR PREM _ _ _ _ . 01.-_4245-021-20._ _ APR PREM 01-4245-070-70 MINN_ DEPT .OF_ REV.. ___ ...MMA _FUEL -TAX_.. 01-4320-050-50 MINN._.FIRE INC QUIC.. TOTE BAG _. 12-4630-000-00 F1 MINN FIRE INC GATED WYES 12-4630-000-00 F1 _55.08 ___ ___.MINN -..M.1_NI.NG$ __F_IRE/_BURG AL SVC- _... 01-4335-310-50 30 55.38 MINN MINING&MFG FIRE/BURG AL SVC 01-4335-310-70 30 158,65 MINN MINING&MFG SYSTEM SVC 15-4330-400-60 30 _..__MINN_.MxNI.NG&MFG._.._. _ __ F.IRELB.URG_ A.L..-.S.VC _ 15-4335-3.1 Q-60 .30 324.79 */ 141.25 MINN TEAMSTER-LOC320 APR DUES 01-2075-DOO-00 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT .__. - _. VENDOR.,. _..__ _ ___ ITEM DESCRIP_TION._ .-_AG.COU.IVT ..NQ* .I 141.25 *� _ 25*0Q. _ _-MINNESOTA- TORO -.INC SVC MANUAL 25.00 *� 296.29 NORTHERiN ST POWER CO APR SVC 160*05_ _._ _ NORTH_£R(N. ST POWER. -CQ... APR..SVC -,0 160.05 NORTHERIN ST POWER CO APR SVC 91.37 NORTHERN ST POWER CO APR SVC _ 45.20.._.-_-- . _.-NDRTHF-MN. ST -POWER.-CO-_ .. APR..SVC....._ 103.58 NORTHERN ST POWER CO APR SVC 731.62 NORTHERIN ST POWER CO APR SVC 731 .62 .- -- __-- -.__.NORT)IERN_ S_T.. POW.ER - CQ _ APR SVC 804.00 NORTHERN ST POWER CO APR SVC 132.64 NORTHERN ST POWER CO APR S VC 1.60*0-5 ... _ ..-NQRTHERN.-S.T POWER ..CO-. ___ APR SVC _._. 223.40 NORTHERN ST POWER CO APR SVC 731.62 NORTHERN ST POWER CO APR SVC 4371.-49-.+t� 01-4211-300-50 _ - -_- _---- .-01--.k2 1.1-31 Q -5Q.. 01-4211-310-70 01-4211-315-30 01-4211-420-50 01-4212-310-51) _ -- - __-- --__01-4 2.12.-31.0--1741 01-4212-315-0 01-4212-320-1,0 15-4211-400-60 15-4212-310-60 39.85 NORTHWESTERN BELL APR SVC 01-4210-02' 0 27.94 NORTHWESTERN BELL APR SVC 01-4210-05L -,0 27.93,,.. _ __.NOR.TH-WESTERN, BELL _- APR. SVC _ __._______...01-4210-070-70: 19.50 NORTHWESTERN BELL APR SVC 05-4210-105-15 216.78 NORTHWESTERN BELL APR SVC 15-4210-060-60 332.0.0 -- --- - -- - -- __ _ .-- - - - 19.50 18.00 __._4.50 29 , 250.90 279001.80 6 9747.30 639042*00 #� NORWEST BANKMPLS NORWEST BANKMPLS NORWEST BANKMPLS _.. NORWEST BANKMPLS NORYEST BANKMPLS NORWEST. BANKMPLS FEE 5/1/82 BONDS 75-4226-949-00 FEE 5/1/82 BONDS 75-4226-950-00 __. FEE _5/1/82 BONDS. .... 75-4.226-951-00. 5/1/82 BONDS 75-4456-949-00 5/1/82 BONDS 75-4456-950-00 5/1/82 BONDS, _ _ 75-4.456-9.51-00 . 7*50 OXYGEN SERVICE CO DEMURRAGE THRU 3//15 01-4305-050- 50 r 50.54 PAYLESS CASHWAYS INC LUMBER 01-4305-070-70 39.10 PAYLESS CASHWAYS INC LUMBER/CONC MIX 01-4305-07' '0 89.64 *,-. - _ _ _. - .- CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT.__..__ ___. _._._..._ _.V.ENDO_ _._._..__._. _. ...ITEM DESCRIP_TL9N __. _..__ ACCOUNT...NO_•,_IN' ----------- 7.9 ,.63. __ ...._ __P_I.NE__BEND_. PA VING . INC.- MC._ MI X_...._ _. _ . ._ __.. _ _._._ ._01-4 4 22- 05 0- 50 79.63 *� 13.12 S&T OFFICE PROD PRTR RBNS 01-4300-110-10 19290.J0 SHAUGHNESSY L E JR TAC TIME 01-4220-132-00 1 X290 *00 *� J L QQ__ _. ._... SALT/_SAN.D_----------------_._01_-4421.-050-50 290.74 *� 49*50 SIGNAL CAR MASH MARCH WASHES 01-4430-020-20 13.00 SNYDER ORJG STORES FILM 01-4305-020-20 20*77 SNYDER DRUG STORES FILM/PROCESSING 01-4305-020=20 . _. 33_.7?_*� ___ .___.___-_._ _____. - ------------•-- - --. _. .. _ ._. _..--------------- - ------------- __ ... 1 9905.82 ST TREAS PERA PERA W/H 3/30 PR 01-2062-000-00 19314*70 ST TREAS PERA 3/30 PERA 01-4406-020-20 519,28_. _. ST TREt.S _PE.RA _. _ -- 3/30.- PERA ..__ _ _ ____ _ ._ 0)-4406--021.--20 . 17,26 ST TREAS PERA 3/30 PERA 01-4406-030-30 57.12 ST TREAS PERA 3/30 PERA 01-4406-040-40 __-..-ST .TREAS 2ERA_- ._____ __ __ __ _3./30-PER.A . __ __ .__ _01!!4406-050-50 115*57 ST TREAS PtERA 3/30 PERA 01-4406-070-70 2.09*97 ST TREAS PERA 3/30PERA 01-4406-110-10 264.,25 . -, ST TREAS _PERA......_.. 3/30 PERA _ _.. __05-4406-105-_1 5 69.47 ST TREAS PERA 3/30OPERA 15-4406-060-60 49676.05 */ _. .62.99 _____.. -...__&T..PAUL._BOOK&ST.AT-... SPL YS _ --------- -__.__01-4300-020-20 62.99 «� 41*65 ST PAUL EMPL ASSN TIME CHGS 01-4224-050-50 41 *65 _ _ - ST.__PAUL. EMPL AS.SN ._ TINE CHGS _. _01-.4224-070-70 41*70 ST PAUL E4PL ASSN TIME CHGS - 15-4224-060-60 125.00 AMOUNT _. _. 1 •966.88 1996¢.88 *, CHECK REGISTER - VENDOR WALDOR PUMP ITEM DESCRIPTION - ACCOUNT..NO. IV RPRS LILY&STORM LS 15-4330-400-b►'0 235.00 MANUAL WINTMROPWEINSTINE&S RE RILEY DEV 01-2148-000-00 66.20 4INTHROPWEINSTINE&S RE DEF CMP 01-4220-120-10 - 10479- WI-NTMRQPWE.INSTINE&S .REH .BROOKS ,_. - 01-4220-12Q-,10 19053.06 WINTHROPWEINSTINE&S RE FIRE RELIEF 01-4220-120-30 85.00 WINTHROPWEINSTINE&S RE WAHL KRAJNIACK 01-4220-120-80 1.9500.0.0. _W.INTH.R.OP_WEINSTINE&S__-_.-.._-_1-ST -QTR.-RET. _. _- _ _01-4.2.2.1___1.20-1'0,. FIT W/H 3/30 - ---- - 39235.86 WINTHROPWEINSTINE&S 1ST QTR PROS 01-4222-020-2f0 677.20 WINTHROPWEINSTINE&S RE FS CONST 16-4220-850-00 _ 200.00 _WINTHR.APWEI NSTINE&S._ - RE FH CONY __. _ _.._ .... _ _74-4220-91,9-,00 79258.52 ik 27,300.00 Perkegwin Inv. FS Property 32,097.30 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL FUND if 776.31 FUND 05 TOTAL ENGR ENTERPRISE 23.25 FUND 07. TOTAL .,CIVI-L. DEFENSE_. 156.00 FUND 10 TOTAL SPECIAL PARK FUND 129574.28 FUND 12 TOTAL EQUIPMENT CERTIFI'ATES _f UND.- .1.5 _J_0 T -AL.. 908.45 FUND 16 TOTAL TID 179-7/81-4/82-2/82-6 200.00 FUND 74 TOTAL CONS PROJ FUND 639042.00__- __._FUNQ_75 -TOTAL. _-_.-__._ ..i81-6/81_-7/81_-8_-_,__. 7.04 FUND 89 TOTAL T83-6CALLARAN/KEUP+E 11 59274.9.4 TOTAL--- -- -TOTAL--.- MANUAL CHECKS 10477 260.60 U. S. Post Office lstQtr Swr bill postage 10478 2,477.94 St. Treas SS 3/30 FICA Taxes - 10479- - 50.00 --Dakota Cty Bank' 3/30 Payroll De'duc'tions - 10480 300.00 Dakota Cty Bank it 10481 1,140.15 St Cap Cr Un " 10482- 4,630.00 Dir Int Rev- - FIT W/H 3/30 - ---- - 10483 21,482.10 City MH PR Acct Net Payroll 3/30 10484 160.00 Dak Cty Ch Comm City Portion NDC Trng - 10485" '50.00 - Clerk` 'Court -Henn 'Cty Warrant - " " _ "....- 10486 27,300.00 Perkegwin Inv. FS Property 10487 17,666.67 Venita Aarnke if 75,517.46 GT 190,792.40 LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON APRIL 17, 1984 Buelow Excavating Maplewood Sewer and Water, Inc. Midway Sign Company Rumpca Sewer and Water Woodbury Mechanical, Inc. Excavating License Excavating License Sign Erecting License Excavating License Excavating License CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO �/�� April 13, 1984 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admi strator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Valley View Oak 2nd Addition Culligan Continued Hearing Discussion The approval of a plat for Valley View Oak #2 has been delayed and a public hearing on the matter has been continued several times pending the approval of a Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Mendota and Mendota Heights. At this time, a copy of an agreement acceptable to staff is in the hands of the City of Mendota for their approval. Thus far, staff has not received an approved agreement from Mendota. In the meantime, Larry Culligan is anxious to at least develop one parcel on Glenhill Road that can be served with existing public utilities and will not appreciably affect surface water runoff. Attached is a copy of a revised plat dated March 19, 1984 together with Larry's letter dated April 11, 1984, requesting approval of the preliminary plat to permit the development of Lot 1, Phase 1 and delaying development of the Outlot Phase pending Mn/DOT construction along T.H. 110 in 1986. Recommendation Staff feels that Mr. Culligan's request is reasonable and recommends approval as submitted. In as much as Mr. Culligan is not proposing any development of the Outlot at this time staff feels no conditions need to be imposed at this time. The single new buildable lot which will be created as part of plat approval is not within the 40% slope. At such time as is proposed to be developed, Critical Area Site Plan review will be required under the Critical Area Ordinance provisions. The Critical Area Ordinance Review hearing which had been continued to Tuesday evening is not applicable to the newly submitted preliminary plat, and thus the hearing should be closed. The Subdivision Ordinance does not require public hearings by the City Council on preliminary plats, and in fact the plat as now proposed is in conformance with a recommendation by the Planning Commission. Action Required Council motion to close the public hearing on the Critical Area Ordinance Review application along with a motion to approve the revised preliminary plat dated March 19, 1984. APR 12 igo4 DWest Publishing Company • 50 W. Kellogg Blvd., P.O. Box 3526, St. Paul, MN 55165 Tel: 612/228-2500 L. J CULLIGAN, Director MANUSCRIPT DEPARTMENT Reporters, Digests and Textbooks 612/228-2611 City Council City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Members of the Council: April 11, 1984 As you know, the last few meetings we have been working out a Joint Powers Agreement with the city of Mendota which calls for the delay of Valley View Oak, Second Addition until the upgrading of Trunk Highway 110 storm sewer, which is contemplated for installation in 1986 by the Minnesota Highway Department. It has been agreed that I would be able to pursue development of lots along Glenhill Road where utilities are presently located and where construction would not appreciably affect surface water runoff. Although we have not, to my knowledge, received a signed agreement from the city of Mendota, I would like to, at our April 17, 1984 meeting, seek preliminary approval of Lots 1 and 2. These lots fall into the exception provided by the Joint Powers Agreement and can be serviced by existing utilities. The seeking of this approval will allow me to obtain final approval and plat these above mentioned lots. I submit revised plans indicating Phase 1 as the above mentioned lots and Phase 2 to be developed at some future time when the highway construction has been completed. Although Phase 2 has been outlined as to proposed lots, further study will be accomplished when platting.is desired for that phase. After reading the Joint Powers Agreement recently submitted to the city of Mendota, it appears that this agreement is reasonable, and I would assume the city of Mendota will also agree.to its reasonableness. If an agreement with Mendota cannot be reached, I would like to reserve my option to proceed with approval of the plat previously submitted. LJC/mst Cordially yours, Egan CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS April 13, 1984 TO: Mayor, City Cduncil and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing Evergreen Knolls Sewers, Water, Streets Job No. 8314 Improvement No. 83, Project No. 4 DISCUSSION: The April 3rd continued hearing was continued to the April 17th meeting becuase of the concern that the property owners along -Wentworth Avenue (north of the plat) would have limited access to -the south half of their properties if the project was completed as proposed. Staff was directed see if any of the owners provement. The affected asked to respond before been no responses. RECOMMENDATION: to get in touch with these property owners to are interested in becoming a part of this im- property owners were notified by letter and the Council meeting if interested. There have Staff recommends Council approve the two phase construction scheme as presented at the April 3rd meeting. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with Staff recommendation, motions need to be made adopting Resolution No. 84- , Resolution Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Sanitary Sewers, Water, Storm Sewer and Street Construction to serve Evergreen Knolls (Gryc Subdivision) and Adjacent Areas (Improvement No. 83, Project No. 4) and Resolution No. 84- , Resolution Requesting Dakota County to Participate in the upgrading of County Road 8 at the intersection of Wachtler and Wentworth Avenues. City of Mendota Heights. Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWERS, WATER, STORM SEWERS AND STREET CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE EVERGREEN KNOLLS (GRYC SUBDIVISION) AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 83, PROJECT NO. 4) WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the Sixth day of March, 1984, at 7:45 o'clock P.M. in the City Hall of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota pursuant to resolution duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights on the question of the proposed construc- tion of the following described improvements: The construction of an extension to the City's sanitary sewer system, including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acqui- sition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets and easements in the area hereinafter more particularly described. Y The construction of an extension to the City's water distribution system including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acqui- sition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets and easements in the area hereinafter more particularly described. The construction of a storm sewer system including appurtenances and incidental thereto and the acquisition of easements, in and for the area hereinafter more particularly described. The construction of street improvements consisting of the acquisi- tion of easements and the grading, stabilization, drainage and bitumi- nous surfacing, and the construction of concrete curbs and gutters on the streets to be situated in the area hereinafter more particularly described. WHEREAS, due publication of the notice of public hearing on said pro- posed construction has been attended to; and WHEREAS, mailed notice of said hearing has been mailed more than 10 days before the date of said hearing to the owners of each parcel situated within the area proposed to be assessed, all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer reported that the proposed improvement and construction thereof were feasible and desirable and further reported on the proposed costs of said improvements and construction thereof; and WHEREAS, the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is situated within the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota and is more particularly described as follows: Land abutting the East line of Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West and South of Wentworth Avenue (CR 8) and North of Bachelor Avenue together with the West 211.74 feet of the East 566.85 feet of Lot 36, and the West I acre of Lot 36, to- gether with the East 1 acre of the West 2 acres of Lot 36, as well as Lots 39, 40, 41, and 42 of Auditors Subdivision No. 3, Section 24, Township 28 North, Range 23 West. WHEREAS, the City Council then proceeded to hear all persons interested in said improvement and all persons were afforded an opportunity to present their views and objections to the making of said improvements. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows: 1. That it is advisable, feasible, expedient and necessary that the City of Mendota Heights construct the above described improvements, and it is hereby ordered that said improvement be made. 2. That the City Engineer be and he is hereby authorized and directed to prepare plans and specifications for said improvement. 3. That said improvement shall hereafter be known and designated as Improvement No. 83, Project No. 4. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights thisl7th day of April, 1984. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk ,CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 84 - RESOLUTION REQUESTING DAKOTA COUNTY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE UPGRADING OF COUNTY ROAD 8 AT THE INTERSECTION OF WACHTLER AND WENTWORTH AVENUES WHEREAS, City of Mendota Heights is preparing the plans to intersect a new City Street with County Road 8 (Wachtler and Wentworth Avenues) where it makes a 90 degree curve; and WHEREAS, that curve is now very hazardous; and WHEREAS, the City,Engineering staff has worked with the County Engineer to develop a design that would upgrade that curve to make it a tee intersection thus improving the safety; and WHEREAS, Dakota County upgrades County roads through cooperative agree- ments with municipalities on an apportionment ratio of 55 percent (55%) County, 45 percent (45%) municipality. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that Dakota County is hereby requested to participate with the City in 1984 by upgrading County Road 8 at the point where it makes a 90 degree curve changing from Wachtler Avenue to Wentworth Avenue by reconstructing it as a tee intersection with the new City street (Wachtler Avenue extended); and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County be requested to allow the City to complete the reconstruction work in conjunction with the new City street construction Improvement No. 83, Project No. 4, at an estimated cost of $39,100.00, the County share being estimated at $21,500.00 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17 day of April, 1984. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 13, 1984 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Edward F. Kishel City Engineer SUBJECT: Drainage Channel and Erosion Control Structures Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition Job No. 8315 Improvement No. 83, Project No. 6 DISCUSSION: Bids for the above project were received at 10:30 A.M. on April 13, 1984. The following is a tabulation of the bids: M & M Sewer and Water, Inc., Burnsville $ 8,026.00 Scherff, Inc., Inver Grove Heights 9,652.00 Orfei & Sons, Inc., St. Paul 11,503.48 ENGINEER'ESTIMATE 7,784.50 RECOMMENDATION: In that the low bid is about three percent (3%) above the Engineer's Estimate, staff recommends that an award be made to the low bidder pending approval of the Developer. The Developer will evaluate his total cost figures and report back to staff by Tuesday, April 17th. ACTION REQUIRED: No action until the developer agrees to proceed with the project. Council can then adopt a resolution ordering the work, which Resolution will be available on April 17th. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 13, 1984 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public'Works Director SUBJECT: Lot 10, Curley's Addition - Bike Trail BACKGROUND: At staff's request Mn/DOT constructed a bituminous bike trail from Wagon Wheel Trail to Lot 10, Curley's Addition in connection with the I -35E construction. Lot 10 was purchase by the City in 1975 to provide a corridor for access to Rogers Lake Park for the residents in Curley's Addition. THat lot has been a source of maintenance headaches for the City over the years. DTSf.IISSTnN Several Curley's Addition residents attended the April 3rd City Council meeting and requested the City complete the Mn/DOT trail con- struction through Lot 10. Staff studied the alternatives and presented them at the joint Council/Park & Recreation meeting on April 10th. There seemed to be a concensus at that meeting to�complete the trail by following an alignment along theeast and north boudaries of Lot 10. The City would then se4l the remainder of the lot as a new home site. This sale will do several things: 1. Provide the funds for the trail construction. 2. Reduce the future maintenance responsibility of the City. (A new homeowner would -have a manicured lawn matching the neighbors) RECOMMENDATION: Recommend Council authorize staff to prepare the documents for con- structing the trail, splitting the trail right-of-way from the lot, filing the lot split documents with Dakota County and offering the homesite for sale through a realestate agent. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council wishes to implement staff's recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 84- Resolution Authorizing Trail Con- struction and Sale of City Property. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 84 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRAIL CONSTRUCTION AND SALE OF CITY PROPERTY WHEREAS, residents of the Curley's Valley View Addition have requested that bicycle trail construction be completed through City -owned property known as Lot 10, Curley's Valley View Addition; and WHEREAS, Lot 10 was acquired by the City in 1975 with the intent that part of the property would ultimately be used to provide trail access to Roger's Lake Park; and WHEREAS, Lot 10 is a maintenance problem for the City and its present level of maintenance is not characteristic of the neighborhood; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that it would be in the best interest of the City to retain that part of Lot 10 on which the trail would be located and to dispose of the balance of the property; and WHEREAS, that portion of Lot 10 which would remain after the trail right-of- way area is divided from the property would still meet City requirements for side and rear yard setbacks and the 45 -foot front yard setback requirement established in the neighborhood; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the -City of Mendota Heights that City staff be authorized to: 1. Prepare documents for completing the Mn/DOT construction of a bicycle trail through Lot 10, Curley's Valley View Addition; 2. Prepare the documents necessary to divide from Lot 10 a. -trail right-of-way to be retained by the City, and to file that document with Dakota County; 3. Offer the remainder of Lot 10 for public sale; 4. Deposit monies generated by the sale of the remaining portion of Lot 10 in the Special Park Fund. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this Seventeenth day of April, 1984. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Robert G. Lockwood Mayor 4 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 13, 1984 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adm' i1strator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT;: Lexington Heights Addition DISCUSSION: Mr. Riley has sumbitted his final plat with 50 feet of right-of-way along Lexington Avenue as discussed last meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council approve final plat as submitted. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation it should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 84--, Resolution Approving Final Plat for Lexington Heights Addition. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84 - RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR LEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITION WHEREAS, a final plat for Lexington Heights Addition has been submitted to the Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said final plat and finds the same to be in order. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the final plat of Lexington Heights Addition submitted at this meeting be and the same is hereby approved. 2. That the appropriate City officials be and they are hereby authorized to execute the final plat on behalf of the City of Mendota Heights. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17th day of 01( April, 1984. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS mann C� — April 12, 1984 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adna istrator FROM: Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Off icer SUBJECT: Building Permit Approval for 2370 South Lexington Avenue INTRODUCTION Mr. Jim Riley has submitted a building permit application requesting a full building permit to continue construction of the second 75 unit apartment building. HISTORY Council had issued a footing and foundation permit to Mr. Riley for 2370 South Lexington Avenue on March 5, 1984, and he is now ready to begin construction beyond the footing and foundation stage. RECOMMENDATION Staff can see no reason not to issue the permit subject to final plat approval which Mr. Riley assures me will be ready for Council approval on the April 17th meeting. ACTION REQUIRED If City Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation approval of the building permit request would be appropriate. Thankyou for your consideration on this matter. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 10, 1984 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator SUBJECT: 1983 Police Department Annual Report Attached please find \a copy of the 1983 Police Department Annual Report. Chief Delmont will be present at the Council meeting to comment on the report and to answer any questions you may have. Respectfully submitted Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator KDF:madlr attachment Police Departmcnl CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS February 29, 1984 Mayor & City Council: Mr. Kevin Frazell, City Administrator City of Mendota Heights City of Mendota Heights City of Lilydale City of Mendota Greetings: The Annual Report of the Mendota Heights Police Department is herewith attached for your information and reference. The report is a statistical resume of our activity for the year and contains comparative data that you may find useful. This year's report is much briefer than last year's, but I will gladly respond to any other requests for information you may have. Our department is gradually moving towards providing a more proactive stance in our delivery of services, and despite our small numbers, it is gratifying to see that the commitment of the officers and the support of the citizenry makes this shift possible. As in years past, manpower is needed, but we are also beginning to experience a shortage of another kind, that is the shortage of space. The department has approximately 1,500 sq. ft. of leased space. After deducting wall space, required cells, property, evidence, storage, and file space, we end up with 13 people headquartered in approximately 930 sq. ft. Our expensive vehicles and equipment are stored outside all winter because of a lack of garage space and it is not unusual to see a Public Works truck starting or towing vehicles after a particularly cold night. In 1983 we saw the start of new programs, new thinking, and new commitment. With your continued support, 1984 will allow us to continue to move toward our goals of a safer and more secure community. Yours truly, i Dennis J. Delmont, Chief MENDOTA HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT DJD:cb 0 Attachment 750 South Plaza Drive • Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 • 452-1366 POLICE SECRETARY "A" CREW MENDOTA HEIGHTS POLICF PARTMENT TABLE OF ORGANIZAI__., 1982 ICHIEF OF I POLICE SERGEANT "B" CREW CAPTAIN - INVESTIGA "C" CREW POLICE POLICE POLICE OFFICER OFFICER OFFICER POLICE POLICE POLICE OFFICER OFFICER OFFICER POLICE POLICE POLICE OFFICER OFFICER OFFICER PAAT-TIME PART-TIME OFFICER PARTTIME PART-TIME OFFICER PERSONNEL The Mendota Heights Police Department employs 12.75 people in the following positions: 1 - Police Chief .75 - Police Captain 1 - Police Sergeant 9 - Police Officers 1 - Secretary Employees Average Age - Approximately 40 years Employees Average Tenure - Approximately 11 years In addition, the department was served by four (4) part-time police officers and two (2) student/interns from Inver Hills Community College. TRAINING Mendota Heights Police Officers received a total of 400 hours of police training in approximately 16 different subjects for an average of 30 hours each. 322 hours of that training was provided by Dakota County Police Training at a cost of $5.59 per hour. Dakota County Training has improved considerably and we also sent officers to various outside training sessions as time and money permitted. -2- PATROL DIVISION A number of the activities of the Patrol Division are tabulated on a monthly basis. Although they are not all-inclusive and do not reflect preventative and deterent activities, they do give us an idea of the type and amounts of work performed. Reactive Officers respond to specific direction, requests or assignments. 1982 1983 Radio Calls 2,834 3.,110 Assist Officer or Dept. 1,451 1,760 Assist Public 1,265 1,427 Follow Ups 301 365 TOTALS: 5,851 6,662 Proactive Activities initiated by the officer based on observation. 1982 1983 Officer Initiated Reports 1,552 1,209 Verbal Warnings & Traffic Contacts 1,478 1,913 Crime Prevention Activities 20 49 Written Warnings 211 220 TOTALS: 3,261 3,391 Citation and Arrest Offenses observed that require disposition by the court. 1982 1983 Traffic Violations 972 761 Misdemeanor, Gross Misdemeanor & Felony Arrests 98 180 TOTALS: 1,070 941 I -3- 1983 ACTIVITY CALENDAR DWI Arrests 1 every 8 days Burglary 1 every 4 days Larceny (theft) 1 every 2.5 days Vandalism 1 every 3 days Written Warnings 1 every 2 days Automobile Accidents 1 every 1.3 days False Alarms 1.5 each day Public Assists 3 each day Traffic Tickets 2 each day Verbal Warnings 5 each day Radio and Backup Calls 13 each day All Activities 30 each day (Excluding Investigative & Administrative Details) -4- INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES During the calendar year 1983, the Mendota Heights Police Department, through investigative activities and direct arrests, charged thirteen (13) defendants with 19"felony charges. In addition to the felony charges, six (6) defendants were charged with eight (8) counts of Gross Misdemeanor violations. The felony counts were made up of thefts, burglaries, forgery, aggravated assaults and simple robbery. The gross misdemeanor charges were made up of Aggravated Violations, Gross Misdemeanor DUI, Fleeing a Police Officer, Attempt to Escape Tax, and Obstructing Legal Process. The above cases all involved adult offenders. In addition to the above cases, one juvenile was charged with burglary.and theft; as a result of several residential burglaries. In February, 1983, the Midwest Tire Company in Mendota was burglarized. After receiving a lead from another agency in the form of a suspect, investigation turned up evidence allowing the County Attorney to charge the suspect with the burglary. Investigation also identified.a second suspect whose tennis shoes matched the design and size of impressions found in the snow at the scene of the crime. We were unable to develop enough collaborating evidence to get the second suspect charged. A felonious forgery case was cleared through investigation of a young lady from Mendota who wrote a check in excess of $500.00 and cashed it at the Dakota County State Bank. She was ordered by the court to make restitution to the bank, which she did. Two Aggravated Assault cases were cleared through investigation. The first subject was charged by the County Attorney for Aggravated Assault after he was identified through a photo lineup. The victim of the assault required $1,200.00 in dental surgery to repair the damage done by the suspect. The suspect was ordered by the court to make restitution for the damages. In the second Aggravated Assault, two motorists had an argument at the intersection of Hwy. 13 and Hwy. 55 at approxi- mately 6:00 a.m. The result was one motorist stabbing the other motorist twice in the chest area. Followup investigation identified the assailant and he was charged by the County Attorney for Aggravated Assault. The department experienced a rash of Residential Burglaries in the north end of the City in early July. Information from the St. Paul Police Department lead this department on an investigation that resulted in the arrest of one adult and one juvenile for one of the July burglaries. The extended investigation also cleared three other Residential Burglaries, and resulted in recovering approxi- mately $6,000.00 worth of silverware, stereos, radios, and antique clocks. In early December, the department received a burglary report from a resident on Blue Gentian Rd. During the burglary a suspect unwrapped a number of Christmas presents. The Christmas wrapping paper was collected, along with several other items touched by the suspect, and taken to the police station for fingerprint processing. A relatively new process of fuming items for fingerprints was used. Two very good latent prints were developed on one piece of Christmas wrapping paper. The prints were determined not to be from any of the family members. The latent prints were then taken to the St. Paul Police Department where they were entered into the computerized fingerprint files. The computer searched the files for a matching fingerprint, and a suspect was identified. It was learned that the suspect had been released from the St. Cloud Reformatory three days prior to our burglary. The County Attorney charged the suspect with burglary and theft. The case is still pending in Dakota County Court. One Residential Burglary was solved by patrol officers arresting a suspect at the scene of three garage burglaries. The Investigator assisted the patrol officers by taking pictures and developing an aerial map to show the County Attorney the location of the three burglaries and the location of the suspect's vehicle and the poifit at which the suspect was arrested. The suspect has pled guilty in Dakota County Court on the three charges of burglary. .Ther4riswered a silent.. alarm at George's Golf Tee and apprehended one 18'y'e'ar old suspect inside the building. It is believed that this suspect is responsible for a prior burglary at the same location when the alarm system malfunctioned. There was only one Robbery 'in our jurisdiction during 1983. The department was called to Otto's Liquor Store in Mendota to investigate a simple robbery. After compiling a photo lineup, the two witnesses to the robbery were able to identify the suspect. A complaint was issued by the Dakota County Attorney's office, but before the suspect could be arrested he left the State. Several days later he was arrested in Kansas for armed robbery and is now in the process of going S through'their judicial system. This subject will be returned to Minnesota for prosecution of our robbery and several robberies in West St. Paul. Our department was contacted by the Organized Crime Unit of the Minneapolis Police Department in the Fall, 1983, regarding theft of tires from the Midwest Tire Company in Mendota. An uncover officer of the Organized Crime Unit set up a buy of stolen tires and this department cooperated in the operation. The undercover officer, along with the two suspects, drove from Minneapolis to Mendota and the officers from our department, along with two officers from Minneapolis, staked out the Midwest Tire Company until fifty (50) tires were loaded on the truck. We then moved in and arrested the three subjects in the truck. The undercover officer was then released and the two suspects appeared in Dakota County Court and pled guilty to felonious theft. One case of felonious theft by trickery was investigated by the department during 1983. A citizen of Mendota Heights was eventually charged with three counts of theft by trickery. The investigation revealed that the suspect had sold in excess of $14,000.00 Viking Football season tickets. Approximately $6,000.00 worth of the tickets were sold directly or indirectly in Dakota County. The County Attorney's charges were based on these sales. The entire file was turned over to Ramsey County for possible charges in their County. The suspect is awaiting trial at this time in Dakota County. In mid -year 1983, a white collar crime case unfolded. An employee of a local country club was discovered stealing funds from the club by issuing unauthorized checks. The investigation revealed that over a period of two and one-half years an amount in excess of $6,000.00 worth of checks were written. The County Attorney has charged the individual with three counts of felonious theft and the case is now pending in court. In late summer the squads responded to a silent alarm at the Pool & Yacht.Club. They arrested two suspects in a car they spotted leaving the Pool & Yacht Club parking lot. The two suspects turned out to be a brother and sister. A substantial amount of circumstantial evidence, plus an inconclusive report from the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Laboratory, is being analyzed by the County Attorney's office. Charges are still pending in this case. W In the Fall, 1983 a local burglar, turned informant, came to our department and offered information on a subject who was fencing stolen property. A subsequent investigation in conjunction with personnel from the Goodhue County Sheriff's Office, resulted in the issuance of a search warrant and a subsequent search of the Cannon Falls residence. The result of the execution of the search warrant resulted in the recovery of a pickup truck load of merchandise and the arrest of an Eagan businessman who ,resides in Cannon Falls: He was charged by Goodhue County for possession of stolen property. The items recovered included a microwave oven, two radios and a police scanner from a Mendota Heights residential burglary. An indirect result of this search warrant was a recovery of an outboard motor, boat, and trailer which are valued at $3,500.00. -7- ENFORCEMENT Traffic -Citations: 1981 1982 1983 Mendota Heights 765 568 493 'Lilydale 29 154 109 Mendota 250 250 159 TOTAL: 1,044 972 761 Written & Verbal Warnings: Mendota Heights 290 828 1,429 Lilydale 12 69 320 Mendota 104 252 384 TOTAL: 406 1,149 2,133 Non -Traffic Arrests - (Includes Juvenile, Misdemeanor, Gross Misdemeanor, Felony and Warrant): Combined Totals: 1981 1982 1983 101 98 190 PART I. INCIDENTS COMBINED • Offenses are categorized by the F.B.I., by their severity, for statistical purposes. Part I offenses are those considered to be the most serious. Homicide Manslaughter Rape Assault to Rape Armed Robbery Strong Arm Robbery Burglary - Residential Burglary - Non -Residential Larceny Auto Theft TOTAL: • 1981 1982 1983 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 83 56 78 27 26 22 170 186 159 13 13 7 296 -9- 283 267 PART I INCIDENTS MENDOTA HEIGHTS Offenses,are categorized by the F.B.I., by their severity, for statistical purposes. Part I offenses are those considered to be the most serious. 1481 1982 1983 Homicide I Manslaughter Rape Assault to Rape Armed Robbery Strong Arm Robbery Burglary - Residential Burglary - Non -Residential Larceny Auto Theft TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 76 46 70 23 21 12 130 117 94 8 8 S 239 194 181 • PART II INCIDENTS COMBINED Part II includes all other criminal offenses. Aggravated Assault Simple Assault Arson Forgery & Counterfeiting Fraud Possession or sale of Stolen Property Vandalism Weapons Violation Sex Offenses Narcotics Marijuana Synthetic Drugs Other Dangerous Drugs Offenses Against Family or Children DWI Liquor Law Violations Drunkeness Disorderly Conduct All Others TOTAL 1981 1982 1983 1 1 6 18 15 12 5 0 1 6 7 3 28 10 17 0 0 1 127 162 135 7 1 0 5 6 3 1 1 5 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 25 28 44 8 2 4 11 3 16 19 6 7 65 34 39 331 291 295 -10- PART II INCIDENTS MENDOTA HEIGHTS Part II includes all other criminal offenses. 1981 1982 1983 Aggravated Assault 1 0 3 Simple Assault 14 9 5 Arson 4 0 0 Forgery & Counterfeiting 4 2 0 Fraud 3 3 6 Possession or Sale of Stolen Property 0 0 1 Vandalism 108 133 117 Weapons Violations 6 1 0 Sex Offenses 5 4 3 Narcotics 1 1 5 Synthetic Drugs 0 0 0 Other Dangerous Drugs 0 0 0 Offenses Against Family or Children 2 0 2 DWI 22 21 35 Liquor Law Violations 7 0 0 Drunkeness 0 0 4 Disorderly Conduct 17 2 5 All Others 52 28 16 TOTAL: 248 206 202 PART III THROUGH V INCIDENTS COMBINED Includes all other calls for service. J -11- 1981 1982 1983 Suspicion 334 333 254 Runaways 10 3 15 Violation of Road and MV Laws 63 60 51 Parking Violations 15 25 14 Lost/Found Persons 9 14 13 Lost/Found Property 41 36 42 Lost/Found Animals 9 8 6 Lost/Found Vehicles 1 0 3 Fatal Motor Vehicle Accidents 1 3 1 Personal Injury MV Accidents 81 54 52 H&R Personal Injury MV Accidents 2 2 1 Property Damage MV Accidents 171 172 183 H&R Property Damage MV Accidents 31 33 30 Public Accidents 13 11 8 Home & Occupational Accidents 13 30 41 Sick Cared For 84 101 115 Mental Case 6 5 6 Suicide 1 2 2 Firearms Accidents 0 0 0 Sudden Death & Bodies Found 4 10 4 Animal Bites 15 20 13 Domestic 33 45 43 Alarms -Residential 211 214 324 Alarms -Non -Residential 194 231 206 Public Assists 344 520 416 Miscellaneous Service - Public 364 431 373 Miscellaneous Service - Officer 292 324 329 Fires 112 126 148 TOTAL: 2,458 2,813 2,694 J -11- PART III THROUGH V INCIDENTS MENDOTA HEIGHTS Includes all other calls for service. Suspicion Runaways Violation of Road and MV Laws Parking Violations Lost/Found Persons Lost/Found Property Lost/Found Animals Lost/Found Vehicles Fatal Motor Vehicle Accidents Personal Injury MV Accidents H&R Personal Injury MV Accidents Property Damage MV Accidents H&R Property Damage MV Accidents Public Accidents Home & Occupational Accidents Sick Cared For Mental Case Suicide Firearms Accidents Sudden Death & Bodies Found Animal Bites Domestic Alarms -Residential Alarms -Non -Residential Public Assists Miscellaneous Service - Public Miscellaneous Service - Officer Fires TOTAL: 1981 1982 1983 288 277 225 10 2 15 54 49 46 10 14 12 8 11 8 33 27 30 8 7 5 1 0 0 1 3 0 71 43 48 1 1 1 146 142 160 26 24 23 9 4 4 13 25 35 59 72 96 5 3 5 1 2 1 0 0 0 3 7 4 14 18 10 25 34 30 199 199 289 122 133 159 301 447 341 324 343 328 249 272 286 97 112 130 2,080 2,271 2;291 STOLEN/RECOVERED PROPERTY One of the primary goals of the Police Department is to recover and return stolen property,. This is also one of our most frustrating tasks because of the lack of unique identification on recovered property. More use of Operation I.D. would substantially aid us in this effort. Loss Recovered % Recovered 1983 $138,317 $ 17,294 12.5% 1982 $ 89,395 $ 16,120 18% 1981 $230,714 $ 34,532 15% -12- -1 a . MENDOTA HELGI(TS POLICE DL1JA1(TMLNT ACTIVITY I(Leuwl' - ANNUAL REtowr - 198:1 NO. CLEARED Homicide 0 0 Manslaughter 0 0 Rape 0 0 Assault to Rape (Attempted) 0 0 Robbery - Armed 0 0 Robbery - strong Armed 0 0 Burglary - Residential 70 4 Larceny 94 1 Auto Theft 5 0 Burglary - Non -Res. 12 1 TOTAL: 181 6 Aggravated Assault 3 2 Other Assaults (Simple) 5 2 Arson 0 0 Forgery and Counterfeiting 0 0 Fraud 6 4 Stolen Property -Possession, sale, etc. 1 1 Criminal Damage to Property(Vandalism) 117 3 Weapons Violations 0 0 Other Sex Offenses 3 2 Narcotics - Opium, Cocaine and Derivatives 5 5 Marijuana 0 0 Synthetic Addicting Drugs 0 0 Other Dangerous Narcotic Drugs 0 0 Offenses Against Family & Children 2 2 D.W.I. 35 35 Liquor law Violations 0 0 Drunkeness 4 4 Disorderly Conduct 5 5 All Other Offenses 16 4 TOTAL: 202 63 Suspicion 225 Runaways 15 Viol. of Rd. and MV Laws 46 Parking Violations 12 Lost/Found Persons 8 Lost/Found Property 30 Lost/Found Animals 5 Lost/Found Vehicles 0 Fatal Motor Vehicle Accident 0 Personal Injury mv Accident 4C H&R Personal Injury MV Accident I Property Damage MV Accident 160 H&R Property Damage MV Accident 231 Public Accidents -Falls, Drownings, etc. 4 Home & Occupational Acc.-Falls, Burns, etc. 35 Sick Cared For 96 Mental Case 5 Suicide 1 Firearms Accidents 0 LOSS RECOVERED 98,386.00 $ 13,629.00 27,833.00 165.00 7,700.00 3,500.00 4,398.00 -0 .$138,317.00 $ 17,294.00 NO. Sudden Death & Bodies Found 4 Animal Rites 10 Domestic 30 Alarms -»Residential 289 Alarms -Non -Residential 159 Public Assists 341 Miscellaneous Service -Public Initiated 328 Miscellaneous Service -officer Initiated 286 Fires 130 TOTAL: 2,29 Man Hours (approx.) Miles Driven (approx.) Traffic Citations Juvenile Warnings Vehicle Repair and Adult Warning Tickets Ordinance Violation Summons Other Arrests NOTES AND REMARKS CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council April 11, 1984 FROM: Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator SUBJECT: Appointment of Fire Department Officers INTRODUCTION In accordance with the process adopted earlier this year, an interview panel has met with, and evaluated, candidates for the positions of Chief and Assistant Chief. The recommendations of the committee are hereby submitted for Council consideration. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION Applications for the two positions were received through Friday, March 2, 1984. The applicants were: Bill Lerbs, Marc Connolly, John Lapakko, John Neska, John Maczko, and for Assistant Chief only, Paul Dreelan and Tom Weinzettel. An interview panel, as appointed by the City Council, was convened on Saturday, March 31st. Panel members included: Mayor Bob Lockwood Eagan Fire Chief Bob Childers Councilwoman Liz Witt Police Chief Dennis Delmont Councilman John Hartmann Firefighter Bill Chisler City Administrator Kevin Frazell Firefighter Gordon Skjerven The two fire department representatives were elected by the membership of the fire department. The panel conducted a 30 to 45 minute interview with each candidate. Attached is a copy of the questions used in the interview, as well as the point - value system used to evaluate and score candidate responses. Each panel member did an individual scoring. At the end of the day, the panel compiled its individual scorings into one combined group score. In deriving the group scores, the panel had a good deal of discussion about the relative qualifications of the candidates. Based on the results of that process, the committees' recommendations are Bill Lerbs as Chief, and John Maczko as Assistant Chief. Although it was not the committee's intention that our recommendations would be based solely on the candidate's quantitative rankings, Bill and John were the respective top scorers. PROCESS FOR APPOINTMENT Our adopted plan and timeline calls for Chief LeRoy Noack to continue through September 30th. His letter of resignation, with the September 30th effective date, is attached. During this period, Bill Lerbs would serve as Assistant Chief, and be appointed Chief effective October lst. Although John - 2 - Maczko would not become Assistant Chief until October 1st, we will begin to bring him into discussions about future planning for the Department. FIRE DEPARTMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Included in our Fire department plan is the convening of a study committee, to review issues of the future of the Department. I would suggest that Council action on that matter be delayed for the May lst meeting. By that time, staff will have prepared a more definitive structure and purpose for the committee. RECOMMENDATION AS outlined above, the interview panel recommends to the Council William Lerbs as Fire Chief, and John Maczko as Assistant Chief. As City Administrator, it would be my further recommendation, that the' appointments be subject to a six month probationary period. ' =t4 ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with the above recommendations, it should pass a motion accepting the resignation of Fire Chief LeRoy Noack effective September 30, 1984, appointing William Lerbs as Assistant Fire Chief effective immediately, appointing William Lerbs as Fire Chief effective October 1, 1984, subject to a six month probationary period, and appointing John Maczko as Assistant Fire Chief, effective October 1, 1984, and subject to a six month probationary period. Respectful y submitted, Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator KDF:madlr attachments QUESTIONS FOR FIRE CHIEF/ASSISTANT CHIEF INTERVIEWS MARCH 31, 1984 1. Describe briefly your experience with the Mendota Heights Fire Department (i.e., years, percent of runs attended, offices held, etc.). 2. What experience, other than Mendota Heights, have you had in public safety and/or emergency services? 3. What education and formal training have you had in fire fighting and/or emergency services? 4. Suppose you arrive on the scene of a residential fire in the Somerset Club neighborhood. Tell us what steps you, as chief commander, would take. How about a fire at the R.L. Johnson (Target) warehouse? Equipment? Organization? Manpower? Mutual aid backup? - 2 - 5. The Mendota Heights Volunteer Fire Department was founded over 35 years ago to provide the community with fire protection. Obviously, Mendota Heights in 1984 is a very different place than it was in 1948. In your opinion, what do these changes in the community mean, if anything, for the fire department, and the way the City delivers fire services? 6. What is your philosophy of fire prevention? What should be the primary objectives? How would you suggest the City and the Fire Department carry out the fire prevention function? 7. What motivates people to serve on a volunteer fire department? How would you keep the level of committment high? How can we/you interest new people in joining? 8. What, in your opinion, should be the role of the Assistant Chief? If you were the Chief, what responsibilities would you assign -to the Assistant Chief, or if you were Assistant Chief, what responsibilities would you like to have? - 3 - 9. What experience, if any, have you had in supervising and managing people? Do you have a "philosophy" of people management? If so, what is it? 10. What experience, if any, have you had in budgeting and financial manage- ment? Record keeping? Why is it important? 11. Finally, suppose the City Council and City Administrator ask you, as Chief or Assistant Chief, to prepare a memo recommending three specific things that could be done to improve the Mendota Heights Fire Department. What would they be, and very briefly, why? i FIRE CHIEF/ASSISTANT CHIEF CANDIDATE EVALUATION FORM 1. Rate the candidate's knowledge and experience in firefighting, public safety, and emergency services. 1. Limited. 2. Less than average. 3. Average. 4. More than most. 5. Extensive. 2. Rate the candidate's training and education in firefighting, public safety, and emergency services. 1. Limited. 2. Less than average. 3. Average. 4. More than most. 5. Extensive. 3. Rate the candidate's knowledge and understanding of fire prevention methods and procedures. 1. Limited. 2. Less than average. 3. Average. 4. More than most: 5. Extensive. 4. Rate the candidate's ability to supervise, manage, and motivate people in the volunteer fire service. 1. Limited ability. 2. Some ability, but with areas of concern or deficiency. 3. Could probably do adequate job. 4. Shows more potential and ability than average candidate. 5. Demonstrated a potential ability to be excellent "people" manager. 5. Rate the candidate's understanding, experience, and ability in administrative tasks -- i.e., budget preparation and control, record keeping, etc. 1. Limited. 2. Less than average. 3. Average. 4. More than most. 5. Extensive. 6. Rate the candidate's "leadership" potential -- that is, the ability to comprehend and articulate the "mission" of the Fire department within the community, and to translate that mission into practical programs of service delivery. 1. Little or no potential. - 2 - 2. More limited than most. 3. Average. 4. Good; better than most. 5. Very good. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 10, 1984 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Frazeli,;eo_,� City Administrator SUBJECT: Economic Development Committee At the April 3rd meeting, Council considered a request from Dakota County Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Bill Escher, that Mendota Heights establish an Economic Development Committee. In response, Council authorized Councilman Hartmann and me to meet with Mr. Escher and other representatives of the Chamber to explore further the role, purposes and structure of that Committee. Councilman Hartmann and I met with them for a breakfast meeting on Tuesday, April 10th. After some lengthy discussion, it was decided that such a committee would have roles and responsibilities revolving basically around the following three themes: 1. To provide recommendations to the Mendota Heights City Council and city staff on policies, regulations, and programs that are of interest to the business community. 2. To act as a liaison between the Mendota Heights business community and the City of Mendota Heights. 3. To put together programs for "marketing" the community to interested businesses. We discussed at some length whether this Committee should be set up under the aegis of the City Council, or the Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, con- sidering the pros and cons of each approach. We finally agreed that, at least for the time being, it might be preferable to have the Committee be an arm of the Chamber of Commerce. However, the Committee members did request that the Mayor and City Council designate one representative to the Committee, to provide a City perspective on their deliberations. While it is my intention to work closely with the group in a staff capacity, I think it would be inappropriate for the City Administrator to sit as a member of a Committee which will be voting on recommendations to the City Council. The Council may wish to appoint one of its own members, or a citizen at large. ACTION REQUIRED To appoint a representative to this Chamber Economic Development Committee. If Council does not have a name ready on Tuesday evening, the Committee is not meeting again until May 9. Therefore, it would be possible to postpone this appointment until the May lst meeting. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 13, 1984 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator SUBJECT: Planning Commission Appointment With the appointment of Janet Blesener to the Council, there is now a vacancy on the Planning Commission for a term expiring January 31, 1987. Following Jan's appointment at the April 3rd meeting, Mayor Lockwood invited the other nine candidates who had applied for the Council.position to indicate their interest in serving on the Planning Commission vacancy. Mr. Russell Wahl and Mr. Robert Leffert have both so indicated their interest. The Mayor is currently in the process of checking with the other seven, and will have an updated report of interest on Tuesday evening. ACTION REQUIRED To select an individual and make their appointment to the Planning Commission for a term expiring January 31, 1987. Respectful y submitted, v Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator KDF:madlr CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator April 9, 1984 SUBJECT: Appointment to.Community Development Block Grant District Committee Attached is a letter from the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority concerning the establishment of District Committees for the dis- tribution of Community Development Block Grant funds. As you may recall, Dakota County HRA Director, Carol Schultz, attended the Council meeting during the winter, to explain that Dakota County has now become an "Entitlement" County under the CDBG program, and will be receiving approximately $1.3 million per year for programs to benefit low and moderate income residents. As outlined in the letter, the County Board has adopted an implementation plan, which divides the County into four community development districts. The City of Mendota Heights is grouped with West St. Paul, South St. Paul, Inver Grove Heights, Sunfish Lake, Lilydale, and Mendota. This district will be eligible to receive approximately $360,000 in CDBG funds each year of the entitlement. District committees, consisting of representatives of each of the covered communities, are being formed for the purpose of reviewing and prioritizing funding applications. As such, the City of Mendota Heights is being asked to designate a representative. Councilwoman Elizabeth Witt served as our representative to the County- wide task force which came up with the implementation plan. She has indicated that she would like to continue being involved with CDBG funding, by being the Mendota Heights representative on the District Committee. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with Councilwoman Witt's request, it should pass a motion appointing her as the Mendota Heights representative to the Dakota County Community Development Block Grant District Committee. KDF:madlr attachment Respectfull submitted, 2 Rqvs Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator 11AKV IA UIJUl1 1 1 I& HRA Ilfl ° ii� �� EiIliiililii Serving People and Communities March 27, 1984• Kevin Frazell Mendota Heights City Hall Dakota County State Bank Building Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Kevin: t�rinv t �► uv u�IN 1.1 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2496 - 145th STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068 612-423-4800 r;; 4. . On February 28, 1984 the County Board adopted an Implementation Plan for the Dakota County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Entitlement Program. This plan was developed (a copy is attached) by a thirteen member Task Force of local officials from communities throughout the County. It was decided by the Task Force that the County should be broken up into four community development districts as indicated in Figure #1 of the attached plan. The City of Mendota Heights is grouped with the Cities of West St. Paul, South St. Paul, Inver Grove Heights, Sunfish Lake, Lilydale, and Mendota. Their district will be eligible to receive 36% or roughly $360,000.00 in CDBG funds each year. Since communities are most familiar with their needs, it was decided by the Task Force and approved by the County Board that each district should establish a committee to perform the following duties: (1) Review and rank applications submitted by communities from the District. (2) Provide a recommendation to the County Board based on the commit- tees review of which projects should be funded and for what amounts. (3) Establish rules and guidelines for evaluating proposals consistent with HUD regulations. The HRA will provide staff services to the committee including reviewing appli- cations to insure projects are eligible for CDBG funding, and providing a critique of the relative merits of each proposal. Since the function of the District Committee is an important one, we would like to request the participation of the City of Mendota Heights by having you make one appointment to the Community Development District Committee. We envision the Committee meeting about four to six times a year for the purpose of receiving some brief training on the program and reviewing applications. The decision whether to appoint city staff, elected officials, or citizens has been left up to the community to make. The Committee will consist of one member from each of the larger communities in the District (South St. Paul, Mendota Heights, West St. Paul, and Inver Grove Heights) and one member on a rotating basis from the Cities of Sunfish Lake, Mendota and Lilydale. The total size of the Committee will be five. We would greatly appreciate an appointment from your community by May 1. We hope the attached information is helpful and we look forward to working with you on this exciting program. Sincerely, 11�A Mark Ulfers Deputy Executive Director MU:kg Attachments CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator April 9, 1984 SUBJECT: Appointment to Community Development Block Grant District Committee Attached is a letter from the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority concerning the establishment of District Committees for the dis- tribution of Community Development Block Grant funds. As you may recall, Dakota County HRA Director, Carol Schultz, attended the Council meeting during the winter, to explain that Dakota County has now become an "Entitlement" County under the CDBG program, and will be receiving approximately $1.3 million per year for programs to benefit low and moderate income residents. As outlined in the letter, the County Board has adopted an implementation plan, which divides the County into four community development districts. The City of Mendota Heights is grouped with West St. Paul, South St. Paul, Inver Grove Heights, -Sunfish Lake, Lilydale, and Mendota. This district will be eligible to receive approximately $360,000 in CDBG funds each year of the erititlement. District committees, consisting of representatives of each of the covered communities, are being formed for the purpose of reviewing and prioritizing funding applications. As such, the City of Mendota Heights is being asked to designate a representative. Councilwoman Elizabeth Witt served as our representative to the County- wide task force which came up with the implementation plan. She has indicated that she would like to continue being involved with CDBG funding, by being the Mendota Heights representative on the District Committee. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with Councilwoman Witt's request, it should pass a motion appointing her as the Mendota Heights representative to the Dakota County Community Development Block Grant District Committee. KDF:madlr attachment Respectfull submitted, 2 ;�� Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator 11AILV I K U" U IN I I HRA MOM ;:sst;s Serving People and Communities March 27, 1984 Kevin Frazell Mendota Heights City Hall Dakota County State Bank Building Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Kevin: 11ti11 V 1.1A %-A" U' J.1 1 1 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2496- 145th STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068 612-423-4800 On February 28, 1984 the County Board adopted an Implementation Plan for the Dakota County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Entitlement Program. This plan was developed (a copy is attached) by a thirteen member Task Force of local officials from communities throughout the County. It was decided by the Task Force that the County should be broken up into four community development districts as indicated in Figure #1 of the attached plan. The City of Mendota Heights is grouped with the Cities of West St. Paul, South St. Paul, Inver Grove Heights, Sunfish Lake, Lilydale, and Mendota. Their district will be eligible to receive 36% or roughly $360,000.00 in CDBG funds each year. Since communities are most familiar with their needs, it was decided by the Task Force and approved by the County Board that each district should establish a committee to perform the following duties: (1) Review and rank applications submitted by communities from the District. (2) Provide a recommendation to the County Board based on the commit- tees review of which projects should be funded and for what amounts. (3) Establish rules and guidelines for evaluating proposals consistent with HUD regulations. The HRA will provide staff services to the committee including reviewing appli- cations to insure projects are eligible for CDBG funding, and providing a critique of the relative merits of each proposal. Since the function of the District Committee is an important one, we would like to request the participation of the City of Mendota Heights by having you make one appointment to the Community Development District Committee. We envision the Committee meeting about four to six times a year for the purpose of(receiving some brief training on the program and reviewing applications. The decision whether to appoint city staff, elected officials, or citizens has been left up to the community to make. The Committee will consist of one member from each of the larger communities in the District (South St. Paul, Mendota Heights, West St. Paul, and Inver Grove Heights) and one member on a rotating basis from the Cities of Sunfish Lake, Mendota and Lilydale. The total size of the Committee will be five. r _2_ We would greatly appreciate an appointment from your community by May 1. We hope the attached information is helpful and we look forward to working with you on this exciting program. Sincerely, AA Mark Ulfers Deputy Executive Director MU: kg Attachments CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 10, 1984 T0: Mayor, City Council and City AAitrator FROM: Orvil J. Johnson Special Projects Administrator SUBJECT: Street Lighting Policy INTRODUCTION The matter of street lighting was discussed by the City Council in June, 1983, and continues as one of the top priorities. Since that time, staff and City Council have agreed that street lighting services should be further considered as a Mendota Heights objective. The following memo will provide some past history and current status. HISTORY The present street lighting service was not planned. It has only resulted as a reaction from citizen requests, staff input and some factors beyond local control. There are two basic types of lighting in Mendota Heights: 1. A joint agreement with West St. Paul for some 20 lights on Delaware Avenue. This lighting, on a County road, costs each municipality approximately $850 per year. 2. Lights at miscellaneous intersections on TH 13, TH 149, TH 55, TH 110 and several County roads. Currently there are approximately 32 lights on these thoroughfares. The direct cost to Mendota Heights is approx- imately $3,400 per year. With the exception of some TH 110 lights by the State and County, the other lights were ordered by City officials over the years in response to requests. There is no engineered or designed lighting system in Mendota Heights. The only exception might be a small 13 fixture system within the Eagle Ridge complex. They have installed a private system, with the installation and energy costs being paid for by the Association. In 1982, a study was made by Jim Danielson and me. on street lighting. Several preliminary neighborhood schemes were laid out to test the cost of lighting. An underground, ornamental system for Somerset 3, using only 8 fixtures for some 74 "benefitted" lots amounted to approximately $4.50 per quarter per lot. An overhead system of six lights for 43 lots in the Lake Drive, Bluebill Drive neighborhood amounted to $4.80 per quarter per lot. These were minimum design systems, attempting to keep quarterly charges at $5.00 or less. In both cases, the fixture rental charges by NSP included installation, plus energy and mainten- ance costs. It seems prudent to have NSP install and maintain such facilities (and then charge accordingly), rather than have the City install the poles, M fixtures and lamps and then have to have materials and manpower to maintain the facilities. A well-designed and planned lighting system would, in all probability, cost in excess of $10.00 per quarter per lot. On February 2, 1982, a proposed resolution was presented for Council consideration(see Exhibit A). 'No't6s* from the ��Cbiunc-il i6eetingjd*,niditate very little discussion. The official minutes do not even acknowledge any discussion. It seemed that there was minimal interest in this type of service and no further staff activities were pursued. The subject of street lighting came up during Lyle Sumek's workshop in June, 1983, and has been on the list of "Things to Do" ever since. This memo will provide more information for discussion. The "street lighting policy" will still depend upon City Council desires -- and the level of service expected in the community. DISCUSSION AND RELEVANT DATA What level of lighting is wanted? How much is the City prepared to pay for street lighting service and energy? As mentioned, approximately 32 lights are currently in place on the major thorough- fares. This is broken down as follows: N 5 lights on TH 13, with 17 total street intersections. (Mendota area not included.) 3 lights on TH 55, with 8 total street intersections. 16 lights on TH 149, with 32 total street intersections. 8 lights on TH 110 on four intersections. (Four State installed). 3 lights on Lexington, with 8 total street intersections. 2 lights on Victoria, with 10 total street intersections. COST: ABOUT $285 PER MONTH, OR $3,420 PER YEAR. NSP plans to convert the mercury vapor lights to sodium vapor in 1987. There are some 20 lights on Delaware Avenue, between Annapolis Street and TH 110. The cost for this lighting is "split" with West St. Paul, costing each municipality some $850 per year. In addition to the foregoing itemized costs, the City pays for a portion of the lights on TH 110. The State pay for lighting at TH 149 and I -35E. However, the City pays for lighting the several County road intersections, i.e., Delaware and Lexington Avenue. As you may recall, the budget line item for street lighting is as follows: 1983 Estimate: $4,600 1984 Budget: $5,000 - 3 - ® The foregoing information is for thoroughfare intersection lighting only. This does not include any residential street lighting, no security lighting, no "white way" lighting or any engineered lighting system. Should lighting be provided along the trail routes? Should lighting be a part of new residential neighborhood developments? It would seem that trailway lighting should be funded by the General Fund. Residential development lighting should be specially assessed. As the February 2, 1982 proposed resolution indicates, there would be two classes of service: Class I - Thoroughfare intersection lighting; Class II - Area benefit lighting. As the resolution acknowledged, thorough -fare lighting should be funded via General Fund monies and the area lighting would be'specially assessed, via quarterly utility bills. The resolution directed the Public Works Director to prepare preliminary plans and costs for typical systems. Then when an interest is expressed by a neighborhood, the background information is avail- able for discussion purposes. The resolution envisions no specific activities by City staff; they would wait for public requests in order to initiate any ® area lighting plans. It is fair to say that the subject of street lighting, and a "policy statement" has been slow in materializing because of apparent disinterest. There have been very few inquiries or requests for lighting over the years. Staff has not promoted the idea, the general public has not demanded an increase; hence the apparent lethargic attitude. Obviously, any increased level of light- ing will either increase the general budget, or increase assessments (or quarterly utility bills). This adverse monetary impact has discouraged any positive action -- given the lack of public requests. The attached resolutions attempt to set forth a frame work, without either discouraging or promoting lighting. RECOMMENDATION It is suggested that the City Council again consider a proposed resolution. Some position concerning lighting should be agreed upon and accepted. If you acknowledge and agree with the Class I thoroughfare concept, do you concur that it should be a General Fund expenditure? Would you want to gradually increase the coverage? (Note that less than one half of the thoroughfare intersections are presently lighted). If you concur with the Class II concept, then the past preliminary cost estimates should be updated to reflect current costs and fixture avail- ability. Should neighborhood lighting be promoted? If so, in what manner? ACTION REQUIRED A new proposed resolution (Exhibit B) is attached for your consideration. Changes have been made, reflecting the discussion in 1982. OJJ:madlr enclosures CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 82 - RESOLUTION CLASSIFYING STREET LIGHTING SERVICES AND ESTABLISHING CHARGES THEREFORE WHEREAS, Ordinance 701 provides for the assessment of costs for current services, including street lighting; and WHEREAS, there are two basic needs for street lights, namely (1) lighting the intersections of state, county and MSA thoroughfares, and (2) providing lighting for the benefit of residential, commercial and industrial areas; and WHEREAS, the cost of installation and operation of residential, commercial and industrial lighting is optional and based on area desires, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that there are two classes of street lighting established: Class I: Thoroughfare Intersection Lighting Class II: Area Benefit Lighting; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the costs of Class I lighting shall be supported by tax levies, the installation and operational costs of Class II lighting shall be assessed in accordance with Ordinance 701 and applicable state statutes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Public Works Director establish a preliminary plan, cost estimates and guide lines for the installation and operational costs for both overhead and underground systems; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon receipt of a petition for area street lighting, the Public Works Director shall prepare plans and estimated cost, the Council will conduct a feasibility hearing after proper notice, and the improve- ments will be ordered in if such evidence warrants such action; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that charges for such current services shall be added to the quarterly sewer billings for the properties connected to the sewer collection system, and the charges for undeveloped properties shall be assessed as set forth in Ordinance 701, Section 5. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this February , 1982. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood Mayor 2nd day of 9 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84 - RESOLUTION CLASSIFYING STREET LIGHTING SERVICES AND ESTABLISHING CHARGES THEREFORE WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 701 provides for the assessment of costs for current services, including street lighting; And WHEREAS, there are two basic needs for street lights, namely (1) lighting the intersections of state, county and MSA thoroughfares, and (2) providing lighting for the benefit of residential, commercial and industrial areas; and WHEREAS, the cost of installation and operation of residential, commercial and industrial lighting is optional and based on area desires. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that there are two classes of street lighting established: Class I: Thoroughfare Intersection Lighting Class II: Area Benefit Lighting; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the costs of Class I lighting shall be supported by tax levies, the installation and operational costs of Class II lighting shall be assessed in accordance with Ordinance No. 701 and applicable state statutes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Public Works Director establish a prelim- inary plan, cost estimates and guide lines for the installation and operational costs for both overhead and underground systems; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon City Council approval of a petition for area street lighting, the Public Works Director shall prepare plans and estimated cost, the Council will conduct a feasibility hearing after proper notice, and the improvements will be ordered in if such evidence warrants such action; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that charges for such current services shall be added to the quarterly sewer billings for the properties connected to the sewer collection system, and the charges for undeveloped properties shall be assessed as set forth in Ordinance 701, Section 5. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this day of , 1984. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood Mayor '� X, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator April 13, 1984 SUBJECT: 1984 Public Works Negotiations Update INTRODUCTION At the April 3rd meeting, Council held a closed door session to discuss the City's position for a 1984 Public Works contract. That position, as authorized by Council, was presented to the union on Thursday, April 5th. The union negotiation team is prepared to present that offer to the membership for their consideration. However, at the session they brought up the possibility of implementing an amended summer work schedule, that being four ten hour days, or possibly four nine hour days with a four hour Friday. Based on my discussions with the employees and supervisor since that time, I am prepared to recommend that Council authorize implementation of such a schedule under stipulated conditions. DISCUSSION When the amended summer work schedule issue was brought up at contract negotiations, I agreed to further consider the request, since I think there is potential benefit to the employer, as well as the employees in this type of arrangement. In discussing it with Public Works Director Jim Danielson, and Public Works Superintendent Dick Ploumen, we identified areas of concern, but also areas of potential benefit to the City as well as to the employees. With the permission of the union business agent, I met with the employees at the Shop on Friday, April 13th, to do some "brainstorming" about the pros and cons of an amended summer work schedule, and how we would practically implement it. Out of those discussions, the employees identified eight specific ways that they thought the amended schedule would benefit both the City and the employees: 1. A nine hour day would allow the Parks crew to complete maintenance of some of the larger parks (i.e., Friendly Hills and Ivy Falls) in a single day, whereas now they have to spread the work over two days, and moving the equipment back and forth twice. 2. Better use of part-time summer help (that i.e., we will be able to have them work more hours without running into the 67 day requirement for full-time benefits.) 3. Less productive hours lost in start-up and breakdown time. 4. Longer days to complete blacktopping projects without overtime. - 2 - 5. Less overtime for street sweeping. 6. Less overtime paid to employees for repair of utility breaks during installation. .7. Set aside short Fridays for equipment cleaning and repair. 8. Happier (and more productive?) employees. During my meeting with the employees, we identified two cons: 1. Going with four ten hour days would require splitting up the work crews, since we would have some of the employees working Monday, some Friday, and only full crews on Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday. 2. Longer rain days. This is certainly not to suggest that either of these are a comprehensive list of the pros or cons. During our discussions, the employees decided that a schedule of four nine hour days, with a four hour Friday, would be more workable. Superintendent Dick Ploumen agrees that he would prefer to manage this type of a shift arrange- ment. The only exception is the mechanic, Fred, who prefers to continue working five eight hour days. We see no problem with his being on a different schedule, since this would give him Friday afternoons without interruption for getting more difficult tasks accomplished. COMMENT While I think that there are many potential benefits to the City to this type of work arrangement, I am not thoroughly convinced that it is preferable to the current work arrangement. On the other hand, I am certainly not con- vinced that it won't work just as well, and in fact have some benefits. There- fore, it is my suggestion that we try it on an experimental basis. It is always a good idea to go wading in unknown waters, before you dive in head first for a long swim. I would be amenable to agreeing with the union that the contract be amended in such a way that alternative work schedules could be accommodated. This" would basically involve converting most leave arrangements (i.e., vacation, s3.ck, and holiday) to an hour basis. Employees would continue to earn these benefits at the same number of hours per month as present, but would expend them on the basis of actual hours taken off. For example, they will earn eight hours of sick leave, but if they are sick for a full regular work day they would take nine hours on the payroll. I would not at all be amenable to writing the contract in such a way that amended summer work schedules are mandatory. Assuming that the union agrees to the permissive language, we would begin the amended work schedule sometime in May, and evaluate it on a month -by -month basis, to see if it was meeting the expectations and needs of both the employees and the City. RECOMMENDATION Based on the considerations outlined above, it is my recommendation that we allow ourselves to experiment with an amended Public Works schedule, by - 3 - making changes in the contract which would make such work schedules permissive. ACTION REQUIRED Council should indicate whether there is a general concensus to make necessary amendments in the contract, and experiment with an amended work schedule. No formal action is required, as the completed and adopted contract will be presented to Council after ratification by the union membership. Respectfully submitted, Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator KDF:madlr CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Sanitary Sewer Sealing - SSES BACKGROUND: April 13, 1984 As a result of the Infiltration/Inflow recommendations in 1982, Council authorized staff to proceed with further analysis of the sanitary sewer system to see what could be done to eliminate excess infiltration/ inflow as identified in the report. The budgeted amount for 1984 was $10,000. DISCUSSION: Tom Knuth and Tom Olund have been measuring the flows during non - peak hours in suspected areas to locate lines where infiltration is high. They have located several lines that have very high infiltration. We have also used South St. Paul's T.V. camera do verify some of the line leaks. Tom Knuth and Tom Olund., using wiers, have measured infiltration in the lines identified to be approximately 160,000 gallons per day. Staff feels that this is a significant amount and that*it would be economical to eliminate. Staff has contacted a contractor who seals sanitary sewers. He has given us a time and material quote to work for the City (attached). Staff has calculate that by sealing these lines the City would re- cover its costs in this same year. Seal Infiltration using Solidifcation - $5000 Repair service leak using Scherff 1200 6200 Total volume of leaks = Assume 50% success = 80K Gal X 75¢ _ Day K -Gal $6200 = 103 day payback 60 160K gal/day 80K gal/day $60/day payback Staff will then measure flows after work is completed to quantify success and if it appears to be as economically successful as hoped we would recommend continuing this work in future years until the entire City has been completed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council direct Staff to prepare purchase orders to utilize Solidfication at the proposed rates not exceed $5000 total cost and a purchase order to utilize Scherff, Inc. not to exceed $1200. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with staff recommendation, a motion should be made authorizing staff to execute the necessary purchase orders. SOLIDIFICATION, INC. B#987 Specialists In Grouting & Underpinning 7233 Winnetka Avenue North MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55428 (612) 535-1065 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE DATE City of Mendota Heights 452-1086 4/04/84 STREET JOB NAME 750 South Plaza Drive Televise and Seal, Manhole Seal CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 Various within city ]6 DATE OF PLANS JOB PHONE James E. Danielson, P.E. We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: Television inspection and sealing joint leaks in approximately. 2,000 l,f- of 8", 9", and some 10" pipe at about five locations; seal 2+ manholes and 3-4 leaks in first joint out of manhole. Manholes are poured (not block or brick) and pipe is mostly clay tile, PRICE TV & Seal ------------------------------------------ $105.00/per hour Manhole Seal =----=--=--=--------=-----===--==------ 78,00/per hour Grout Sealant - SS -321 ----------------------------- 4,50/per gallon Water Plug (if needed) ----------------------------- _ 9.10./.per gallon PLEASE SIGN BOTH COPIES OF THE PROPOSAL; RETURN THE ORIGINAL TO SOLIDIFICATION, INC. Ile 11rapose hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: As above dollars ($ ). Payment to be made as follows: Upon presentation of invoice All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard Any alteration or deviation from above specifica- Authorized practices. Signature tions involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an ----Robert C a er, Sales nager extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance. Note: This proposal may be 15 ...:.6........., ti.. .... :. ..... ..............1 ...:.L.:.. A.. - Y1 4-1b OM 1-1y 1:-1— Uy W -111C11 S W111NCIIa LWJI !1 IA1n11,.C. Arrptana of ' rapasid —The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized Signature to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of Acceptance: Signature FORM 118-3 COPYRIGHT 1960 - Available from �ss Inc.. Groton. Mass. 01450 Scherff, Inc. 6 • excavating • grading • utilities 10410 Courthouse Blvd. / Inver Grove Heights, IVIN 55075 PLEASE PAY ON THIS I CE NO STATEMENT RENT • site development Phone:,451-9056 UNLESS REQUEST TERMS F.O.B. YOUR ORDER NUMBER INVOICE NUMBER CIE DATE S 14 C- 7 Point of delivery of material and/or rendition of service: l D T 0 L I A service charge of 1'%% perm h �Jill.� �-aded 'toccounts over 30 days This is an annual percentage rate of 18%. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Frazel10 �' City Administra or SUBJECT: 1984 Project Priorities INTRODUCTION April 11, 1984 In late January, Council met in workshop to establish target issues and priorities to be accomplished during 1984. Subsequent to the meeting, staff developed a work project timeline and tracking sheet, to help us spread out the work load and keep things moving in a timely fashion. A copy is attached for your review. I have delayed bringing this back for Council comment, pending appointment of the new Councilmember. DTSCIISSTOW The purpose of adopting our list of target issues is to ensure that staff accomplishes the things that are of importance to the Council. At the January is workshop, issues identified by Council as top priorities were: 1. Comprehensive financial review. 2. Preparation of a service level/workload budget for 1985. 3. Marketing and sale of the Metropolitan Airports Commission property. 4. Appointment of new Fire Department officers and a study of the Department. 5. Development of a Downtown Mendota Heights plan, including upgrading of Dodd Road. 6. Review and potential amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. 7. Execution of a new water agreement with St. Paul, including the possibility of wholesale. 8. Establishment of goals and projects for the tax increment district. 9. Consideration of further park acquisition and development. 10. Adoption of a street lighting plan. 11. Adoption of a liquor ordinance. 12. Publication of a City newsletter. In addition to the Council priorities, staff identified three additional major work items that needed to be accomplished in 1984: 1. The 1984 election. 2. Revisions to the Nuisance Ordinance. 3. Study of the feasibility of a new City Hall. WORK PLANNING With fifteen specially identified priority projects, along with usual day- to-day responsibilities, I felt it important that we spell out the sequence of events and expected timeline for getting each accomplished. A copy of that is - 2 - attached for review and consideration. Although I delayed bringing it back to Council until the new Councilmember was appointed, staff has kept pace with the schedule. By and large, we are on target. The two exceptions are the Downtown Mendota Heights and Comprehensive Plan issues. They are discussed below. DOWNTOWN MENDOTA HEIGHTS City Planner Howard Dahlgren prepared a "downtown" plan which was presented last fall. That plan contemplated the relocation of Dodd Road to the new easement. However, at that time, Mn/DOT had made no committment on road configuration. Approximately three months ago, staff met with Mn/DOT officials to review the various Dodd Road options they have proposed. We postponed bringing this to ..the Council for review, until the Eagan racetrack issue was settled, since Howard felt strongly that racetrack traffic would impact Dodd Road. Since the racetrack issue is over, we can now get on with Dodd Road and downtown. Mayor Lockwood, Planning Commission Chairperson Kruse, Planner Dahlgren, and I met on April 9th to discuss how to proceed. We agreed that the initial step should be a joint Council/Planning Commission workshop to review the Mn/DOT plans, review the status of Howard's work, and decide how to proceed. It is recommended that the workshop be set for Tuesday, May 29th. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS During the goal setting, we also identified several issues surrounding the Comprehensive Plan. They included housing, noise contour zoning, and economic development. At the April 9th meeting, the Mayor, Cam Kruse, Howard and I agreed that the issue of our housing policy should be addressed, since a committment was made to the Metropolitan Council at th,e time housing revenue bonds were issued for the Lexington Heights Apartment project. We felt it would be premature to address noise contour zoning, since there are still many unresolved issues at the Federal, State and regional level. Economic development policy will be the subject of the new Chamber of Commerce/City Committee. Therefore, the only Comprehensive Plan issue of immediate concern is housing. It was agreed that we would recommend to the Council and Planning Commission a joint session to review the housing policy concept to the Plan. This would include a presentation by the Metropolitan Council staff as to why housing is a regional policy, and what is required in local plans. It is suggested that this presentation, and the review of our housing policy, could be done in conjunction with the bus tour on May 18th. I will have further information on meeting time possibilities Tuesday evening. JY u7.V11M The attached timeline is relatively self-explanatory. Staff will be prepared to discuss issues at more length at Tuesday's meeting. ACTION REQUIRED Council should review the attached work plan, indicating any desired changes. It should also indicate if it is amenable to the May 19 bus tour and housing plan review, and the May 29 workshop to study Dodd Road and downtown Mendota Heights. KDF:madlr CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator April 10, 1984 SUBJECT: Mn/DOT Request for Letter of Endorsement on Dodd Road F.A.U. Funding The Minnesota Department of Transportation, District 9, intends to request funds from the Federal Aid to Urban Highways program for improvements on Dodd Road between 1-494 and the High Bridge in St. Paul. Since a good portion of this section of the roadway traverses through Mendota Heights, they are asking our endorsement of their funding request. I was assured by Mr. Bob Benecke, of Mn/DOT, that our support for the F.A.U. funds in no way connotates support for any particular configuration or type of roadway improvements. As with any Mn/DOT project, plans and specifications would have to be approved by the City of Mendota Heights before project construction. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with the Mn/DOT request, it should pass a motion authoriz- ing the Mayor to sign a letter expressing Mendota Heights' support for F.A.U. funding for improvements on Highway 149. Respectfully bmitted, Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator KDF:madlr CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 13, 1984 TO: Mayor, City Council and City A inis rator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director - SUBJECT: Master Controller along Trunk Highway 110 BACKGROUND: After Council had indicated to staff on several occasions that they were not interested in participating with Mn/DOT on a master controller installation along Trunk Highway 110, Richard Elasky, Assistant District Engineer for Distric 9 came to a Council meeting and convinced Council to change their minds and participate. DISCUSSION: Mn/DOT has now prepared the needed agreement for City participation. It is a standard Mn/DOT agreement with the costs for Mendota Heights being: Item Estimated Cost Funding OPTICOM @ Lexington Avenue $. 6550.00 Capital Improvement OPTICOM @ I -35E 6154.00 Master Controller 5551.00 M.S.A. $18,255.00 RECOMMENDATION: Council has previously agreed to participate in this program and Staff recommends that they now go through with the formalities. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council wishes to implement staff's recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 84- , Resolution Authorizing the City of Mendota Heights to enter into Agreement No. 62044 with the State of Minnesota. City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 84 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TO ENTER -INTO AGREEMENT NO. 62044 WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Mendota Heights enter into an agree- ment with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to -wit: To install traffic control signal with street lights on Interstate Highway 35E West Ramp at Trunk Highway No. 110; revise existing traffic control signals and install Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption on Interstate Highway 35E East Ramp at Trunk Highway No. 110; in- stall Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption on Trunk Highway No. 110 at County Road No. 43 (Lexington Avenue); install Master Control Cabinet and Equipment on Trunk Highway No. 110 at Trunk Highway No. 149 (Dodd Road); and install Interconnect along Trunk Highway No. 110 from County Road No. 43 (Lexington Avenue) to County State Aid Highway No. 63 (Delaware Avenue) in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 62044, a copy of which was before the Council. . -BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17th day of April, 1984. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 9, 1984 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Ad�nistrator FROM: Dick Ploumen, Public Works Superintendent SUBJECT: Summer Help INTRODUCTION This memo is relative to the memo that I placed before the Council on April 3, 1984. It has to do with the hiring of summer help for the Public Works Department. DISCUSSION In my April 3rd memo, I requested that the Council allow me to rehire the same three persons that were hired in the summer of 1983. The Council disagreed with me, and suggested that we give three new people a chance to work for the City. It is my opinion that this is a mistake. The three persons we had in 1983 are experienced and know our operation well. I feel that if we hire new people, we have to take time to train them, thus lessening productive time. The three from 1983 can walk in and go straight to work. There are no guarantees that we would find any perople that are better qualified than what we had last year. I feel that our summer help have to be somewhat of a specialist. It isn't everyone that you can put on a $10,000 park lawn mower and let them run it, or a pavement roller in the Road and Bridge Department. We have these experienced people willing to come back and work for Mendota Heights. RECOMMENDATION Council should change their stand and rehire the same people to work in 1984. ACTION REQUIRED Should Conncil concur with the staff recommendation, we would hire the same people back to work during the summer of 1984. If there are any questions, please feel free to call me at 454-4059, as I am unable to attend the Council meetings, due to a Public Works Adminis- trator course, which I am taking at North Hennepin Community College on Tuesday evenings. 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO Mayor,/Ma rch 29, 1984 TO: Ma or City Council and City�n�stfator � FROM: Dick Ploumen Public Works Superintendent SUBJECT: Summer Help HISTORY Every summer for the past five or six years, the Public Works Department has hired three students for extra summer help. In 1983, the Council suggested that we try to hire from Mendota Heights first. This worked out very well. So well, in fact, that the same people want to work again in 1984. This would eliminate any applications or interviewing of new people. RECOMMENDATION Rehire the same three people as were hired in 1983. ACTION REQUIRED Should Council concur, we would hire the same people back for the summer of 1984. NOTE TO COUNCIL: The three employees for 1983 were: Steven Casey Denton Nerison Jon Lerbs CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO f� � April 9, 1984 v T0: Mayor, City Council and City Ad� strator FROM: Dick Ploumen, Public Works Superintendent SUBJECT: 1984 Street Sweeping INTRODUCTION Bids were received from two companies for street sweeping for 1984. Loomis, Inc., of St. Paul, bid at the rate of $44.50 per hour. Joe Rosse Sweeping of St. Paul, also bid at the rate of $44.50 per hour. DISCUSSION This is the first time we ever had two bids at the same rate. Joe Rosse has told me that for about one week, he will have two sweepers in Mendota Heights, thus completing the City faster than with just one sweeper. ® RECOMMENDATION Award the bid to Joe Rosse Sweeping, at the rate of $44.50 per hour. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, it should award the bid for 1984 street sweeping to Joe Rosse Sweeping. 11 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 10, 1984 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator SUBJECT: Moving Expense Reimbursement INTRODUCTION My employment agreement with the City stipulates reimbursement for relocation expenses, not to exceed $8,500. As itemized below, my actual reimbursement request if $7,765.10. Itemization of my request is as follows: Purchase of Mendota Heights Home: Attorney's Fee $257.80 C.D. Recording Fee 10.50 Total $268.30 Sale of Coon Rapids Home: Realtor's Fee 3,780.00 1 3/47 Guarantee Sale Fee 945.00 Abstract 148.50 State Deed Tax 19.80 Total $4,893.30 Moving of Personal Property: Total $485.50 SUB -TOTAL $5,647.10 Federal/State Tax at 37.57 2,118.00 TOTAL REQUEST $7,765.10 While most of the items are self-explanatory, two require some elaboration, the 1 3/47 guaranteed sale fee on my Coon Rapids house, and the 37.57 tax consider- ation. - 2 - Guaranteed Sale Fee - When we listed our Coon Rapids house for sale, we found that we were in an extremely difficult market, due 'to some local conditions. There were 27 similar units in our townhouse development on the market, and none had sold for several months. In looking at houses in Mendota Heights, we learned of Thorpe's guaranteed sale program, which charges a 2% discount fee. While Thorpe was unwilling to guarantee our sale, the agents with whom we worked, Mark and,,-Ju'iyi Swenson',were willing1'to personally guarantee the sale at a 1' 3/47 discount, to be charged only if they had to deliver on the guarantee. Ultimately, they did. While this did create an extra expense, without the guarantee we still would not be moved. Also, I think the extra $945 to sell that home is offset by the lack of expense in purchasing in Mendota Heights. We purchased here on a contract for deed, and so avoided credit checks, loan application fees, loan origination fees, and mortgage registration tax. These are expenses we will have to personally pick up later on a mortgage to meet the C.D. balloon. Tax Consideration - By I.R.S. regulation, employer reimbursement of relocation expenses is taxable income. If a new job adds 35 or more miles in distance between home and the job, moving expenses are deductible. Unfortunately, I will not meet that criteria. Therefore, I am requesting an additional 37.5%, or $2,118 as reimburse- ment for additional Federal and State income tax. The 37.5% figure is based on a careful estimate of what my marginal tax rate will be in 1984. Budget Impact My moving reimbursement was anticipated by staff in putting together the final budget adopted by Council in January. The cost would be charged against the Administration department, Contingency line item. Respectful y submitted, Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator KDF:madlr CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator April 9, 1984 SUBJECT: Registrations for League of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference The League of Minnesota Cities 1984 Annual Conference is being held June 12 - 15th in Duluth. Attached is a copy of the conference agenda, along with a registration form and housing reservation form. ACTION REQUIRED To discuss who will be attending, so that we can process registration and housing forms. Respectfully submitted, Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator attachments KDF:madlr Highlights Keynote Session — Neal Peirce, widely known and respected syndicated newspaper columnist, will discuss policies that affect your city. A "must" for all conference attendees. Mini -Conference — a day that includes sessions of interest to cities under 5,000 population. Delegates will want to attend sessions on economic development in small cities, the How To's of Annexation, and current issues on staffing and training. Even though Thursday is Mini - Conference Day, small -city officials should note the excel- lent programs on other days as well. Table Talk — features representatives of organizations which provide resources to cities. Four or five agencies will be available in two-hour periods throughout the conference to answer your questions and address your concerns. New this year Walking Tour — if we get enough interest, our host city will treat conference attendees to a tour of the Downtown Renaissance Program for the central business district which includes the Skywalk System, and newly refurbished streetscapes and store fronts. Duluth Library Tour — come and see an award- winning h6rary and one of the first to use a completely computerized reference system. (Late Wednesday after- noon.) Social events • Planning & Zoning: Planner vs. Developer • Economic Development How To's • Property Taxes from A to Z (Session 1) • Hazardous Waste (Session If) 3:00 p.m. Concurrent workshops (Choose one) • City Exchange • Tax Increment Financing — Problems & Possibilities • Property Taxes A to Z (Session 11) • Legislative Update: Taxes and Economic Development Issues 6:30 p.m. City Night Thursday, June 14 Mini and General Conference Program 8:30 a.m. 9:00 a.m. City Night — the city of Duluth has arranged festivities at the beautifully restored Depot. The evening will include cash bar, hors d'oeuvres, and music for dancing and 1:00 P.M. enjoying. League Banquet — an evening of good times, fine food, congenial company, and prized awards. Preliminary agenda Tuesday, June 12 7:00 p.m. Kick -Off Session with Katherine "Working 2:20 p.m. Barrington Effectively with the Public" 9:00 P.M. Reception/cash bar Wednesday, June 13 8:30 a.m. Orientation to conference program 9:00 a.m. Keynote Address, Neal Peirce, 3:30 p.m. syndicated columnist, "National 6:30 p.m. Perspectives on City Problems" 10:15 a.m. Concurrent workshops (Choose Friday, June 15 one) • Minnesota's Tax Burden and Our 9:00 a.m. Business Climate — How Do They Relate • The Problems with Property Taxes • An Overview on Hazardous Waste — (Session 1) 11:45 a.m. Exhibitor's Lunch 11:15 a.m. 1:15 p.m. Concurrent workshops (Choose one) April 1984 Orientation to conference program Concurrent workshops (Choose one) • Comparable Worth: How Will It Affect My City? • Economic Development for Small Cities • Current Issues in Fire Departments • Council/Staff Relationships Mayor's Association and Mini - Conference Luncheon (Speaker(s) to be selected) Concurrent workshops (Choose one) • Employee Evaluations & Discipline: Management Side • Shaking Up the Status Quo with Long Time Employees • How to Contain Health Care Costs • New Issues in Domestic Abuse Cases Concurrent workshops (Choose one) • The How To's of Annexation • Legislative Update: Health and Human Resources Issues • New Issues with Police Grievances • Training in Small Cities League Annual Meeting Reception and Banquet Concurrent workshops (Choose one) • The How To's of City Celebrations • Quality Circles • How to Use Executive Search Firms • How to Use the Media Finale Brunch with Mayor George Latimer 15 MG -- dual = Conference , registration foJULLI egistration 24$; f694' '; number to6l :(6�, �i befo re June 1) .................... .................. $ ea At erencei 1, -71 _:c ki ti Ir drnissiohto�al! :iW viork�hop�;,`a�d'iick�ts fof Pstratidn" e jQ06-ta -a �sivlssions and meal MWong"W ge. _d` coffee and rolls Wed.`,hikfi",Thurs; banquet; -Fri."-'bnmch.--You'�can�4*r..;�.�,*,:4 chasvrog iski Tht",* i.,4 k*ts, ia6cdons including s 'y i,'�o-90�'i��d;vl�dgei�e�t'�rhich you juit-preient,at the prepaid fegistratiod desk' t AXI, 'g AR, M- r -d :1:v ............. ......... ......... ................... ................ . . . . . . all Y M Unt 16 Urs Y; Registration Th , Z V VY, e, 45.00 7 MO U� ci ."Al '55.i* zi� '*J nee - re 56 au -Dad If - badge, coffee and rolls, and luncheon. to -w Cecezvveay. you, must present at the"pirepaid regis&ition-A46W -IMffi' 's, vg.' tsr,;�I,��,,' ev tj&9Jrh�rs&y b "Apuld purchase ticke �nqueic ss Ceiierals%�iference areFwelconie to M -Co4& sessioiii'�'fi�ddo""n'ot-.�--�'i�� ini V. 14Z C `6 " or k. -R? 41 m4 N__. AVAIINZ!, --ow NO i �4 v �K;., pi .40 WO offl, R1,01 W t '�tftrA'$�tt3. • ��e�"r�^1`C•.s`'i(', •':'3. y � a.�- �' �::- ..riv . w'a:3 , ' w ` 5 ` •. f ,,a,,. .. .. w�-� .. !,". �A_, �74 .5— 1'-. NiN -Y N.— V -_fir,.'...,•#a,. .r..: - f .• , '�' Z VI f m you oroer 0� IM to �'-kvceiv 0 0'. th '7V�I ;C- 4*4� 1, xt raj (}'��*{� ,V.N ;M4 0— i't a;- x-4 - 4 7 ML T ......................... d PaY_iu`ent"to:`'GAY'le Bortz League of Minnesota Cities • 183 Ur6ersity Ave. E. • St. Paul, MN 55101 eAOI" vf hfinfiis6ia Cities gue U 1984 LMC Annual Conference, Housing,,, Housing Information"Single',' Double -11 Best Western Downtown Motel, 131 W. 2nd St ................. .... .. .....$37.00 0.00 . $55. Edgewater Motels, 2211 London Road .......................................... ti -.,i ,i ,Lakeside i; $49.00w. 00" F�W. $3 8. 00 2,00,,.-' Harbor Inn, 250 S. First Ave. E . .......................... ........... .60 $52 Holiday Inn Duluth, 207 W. Superior St .................... 09, .135.00�' Interstate Bud get, Hwy 35 & 27th Ave. W. Exit ......... :-� - 0 5 Radisson Duluth Hotel, 505 W. Superior St ........... $ Spirit Mountain Motor Inn, 9315 Westgate Blvd........ %.j �, Is $6-$3000 $4 Voyageur Motel, 333 E6 Superior St . .................. 0.00 IOREach additional ........................ ::--44 00 iafT 4 Holiday Inn Duluth will be the Headquarters Hotel jkl Early Bird Special For member city officials only. Both the Holiday Inn Duluth and ROss0A.'Duluth willprovideane m*pjHffi ept* weekend f6rtwo' at their hotel, excluding meals, as an early bird special prize. Cinlk delegates sending in their hb'u'smig "registration foriii bj�N[4*�131` 1984 will be eligible. The winner must pay the room tax and all iricidenW'c'liir'g*es'-.';.�*" Important Instructions- 1-4 Rooms will be reserved on a first-come, first-served basis: The�.earliei-jqii;inake your reservations;, the better the chance j6u have of getting your first choice hotel. The hotels will hold room blocks, only. until May'*26, 1984, after regular room,rabeWwm';-.--., , be in effect on an as available basis. A deposit equal to one night's lodging. per' room must accompany this h6usifig form You will receive an acknowledgement of your reservation from the assigned hotel. All changes in reservations or cancellations must be madeihrough the ' for late arrival, room deposits will be refunded if reservations are cmcened:No. reservitions"ivW.bea&ept6d'by Dui th u Grandma's Marathon reservations. The Holiday Inn Duluth (contact Lisa -,Waldowiik'14WW-0070)',' izidissotf -(re- q�-ue`-St,- through LMC Housing Bureau) and The Edgewater Motels (cafl,1!800=232-1333-`diiect) each`have wsmaibldcklor, fii§4;he1d--.fbr: the -1- Will those wishing to stay for Grandma's Marathon. With e exception6f-the Radisson Duluth, LMd1conferefiaTata cut off date for making these reservations is May 15, 1984 at thi kidisson Duluth and EdgeviatdrMotel-"I"ind bl'� f made directly with the hotel. The cut-off date for making,reserva�o*ns,ai,.,the,HofidaY.�jtiii'is,A�*-,!,, bn 1 for another block. K, Name: City or Organization: Address: City: Arrival Date: suig`Reservataroii x&=•Fz.,. '' Leaseriot or Hotel Preference First: cond. Special Requirements: Names of All Occupants: N 14 Do you wish to guarantee pay for arrival after 6-60 . ptn.GGs Yes— No— Enclosed is a deposit equal to one night's lodgifig&—kir, (Make check payable to the hotel of your choice.). Mail to-..*-.t-',-A League of Minnesota Cities HousitigBtire I . Duluth Convention and Visitors Bureau - 1731 London Road Duluth, MN,55812"�.-.1 A4.46— T .—: Atf' ME a V 5; T -46661dersignitu.-r-'W"4t. Dato-, eq, 7, April 1984 Yl CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council) /p, FROM: Kevin D. Frazell (� City Administra SUBJECT: May 1, 1984 Agenda May 1, 1984 Submitted below is an additional consent calendar item, 5g., and information relative to items 8c and 8 e. A change in format for con- sidering item 8j. is also recommended. 3. Adoption of Agenda It is recommended that Council adopt the agenda as printed, with the addition of item 5g. - Acknowledgement of resolution of beaver dam problem. 5f. - Acknowledgement of Resolution of Beaver Dam Problem Attached is a memo from Police Chief Delmont proposed for addition to the consent calendar, which describes a beaver dam problem near Valley Park, and how staff proposes to resolve it. Unless Council disagrees with the proposed resolution, it can be adopted on the consent calendar. If Council prefers to discuss it and pull it out as a regular agenda item, I recommend placement as item 861. 8c - Anderson Subdivision Attached for Council information is the necessary drainage easement associated with this project. 8e - 1984/1985 Public Works Labor Contract Attached is the proposed 1984/1985 labor contract with the public works employees. This is as agreed to by the negotiation teams and ratified by the bargaining unit. It does allow for the optional work schedules approved by Council at the April 17th meeting. I will spend a few minutes orally detailing the changes from the current contract. 8j - Appointment of Fire Department Officers Chief Noack's letter of resignation has not been received. Therefore, I think the Council, City Attorney, Chief -designee Lerbs, and I need to discuss the options available to us at this point. Since we will be meeting in the Engineering Conference Room for a closed session on Item 10, I would propose that we discuss the Fire Department - 2 - matter there as well. However, this will not be closed, but rather a public meeting. Upon completion of the Fire Department discussion, we would close the meeting for the employee disciplinary discussion. I would further suggest, that prior Ito reconvening upstMairs, we dispense with Item:9 - Council Comments and Requests. r KDF:madlr attachments" EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this -7-,—j,' day of ;, 1984, by and between <r'. L�.l.� c%�_ _ �_ a party of the first part, and THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, a municipal corportation (hereinafter called the""City"); WITNESSETH: That party of the first part, in consideration of ONE DOLLAR AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION to it in hand paid by the City, the recipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, quitclaim and convey unto the City its successors and assigns, the following: A permanent easement for utility purposes including the right of ingress and egress thereto, over, under and across the parcel or tracts of land lying and being in Dakota County, Minnesota, legally described as follows: The North Fifteen (15) feet of the West Fifteen (15) feet of Lot 1, Bauer's Acre Lots, Section 13, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date and year first above written. STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) s.s. COUNTY OF ) On this % day of 1984 before me personally appeared 246:L6Y-- j described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed same as their free act and deed. otary Public My Commission Expires /�/ 9f This instrument was drafted by: LIAAA W� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS y?Q�=F,;. rd^;kttr'N�F;�ta�ph'��4 Engineering Department C'Ojy�A, exrikk5l�� 750 South Plaza Drive uvvVw„�wy Mendota Heights, MN 55120 MEMORANDUM TO': Mayor, City Council, and City Adii'sStrator FROM: Dennis J. Delmont, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Beavers Introduction Several residents, including Thomas Heaney, 1818 Valley Curve, and Joe Stefani, 1820 Valley Curve, have expressed concern over the destruction and potential destruction caused by beavers who have set up housekeeping behind their homes. They feel, and I concur, that the aquatic rodents should be trapped. History Last year about this time we had Patrick Murphy, a local trapper, remove beavers that threatened Marie Park. This trapping was quick, effective and provided the necessary relief. ni CZ1'11-_Qi nn.q The beavers have built a dam, approximately 150-200 ft.. long, that has restricted the flow of drainage water and which. will eventually create a lake that will cover the private property -in the area. For lumber, they are encroaching into yards and systematically removing large -mature trees that provide a noise buffef)between the homes and the freeway. IT not checked, we may have houses eventually damaged by fallen trees. Alternatives No one wants to adopt a beaver. The nature centers do not want them and the State DNR does not want other areas overpopulated. In fact, DNR wishes we would rescind our Ordinance that prohibits trapping. This would keep the popu-, lation down and help eliminate the ongoing problems. Our Ordinance prohibits trapping with the exceptions noted on the attached copy. DNR encourages us to remove the animals and will give us a permit to do so. Our alternatives appear to be: 1. Allow the animals to continue jeopardizing the named properties, as well as Marie Park, and the homes abutting it. 2. Trap and drown as many of the animals as possible in a quick and discreet manner and abate the problem for another year. Recommendations In spite of the fact that it seems inhumane, I recommend that we have the affected homeowners sign a request and that we grant Patrick Murphy permission to trap and remove beaver, for a period of one week, from the property of=Thomas Heaney - `and'Joe- Stefaini'. Action Ee�ired That the Council approve the above described action. ORDINANCE NO. 914 AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING TRAPPING AND HUNTING IN THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS M .SECTION PURPOSE t It is the purpose of this ordinance to preclude the potential harm that may be inflicted upon people, particularly children, and prevent the unselective catching, maiming and destruction of wild animals and birds'and domestic animals that may result from the indiscriminate use of firearms and trapping devices. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS As used in this ordinance the terms below have the meanings described: 2.1 Trap. Any mechanical device, snare, artificial light, vehicle, net, bird line, or any other similar type contrivance. 2.2 Trapping. The setting or laying or otherwise using of a trap anywhere in the City of Mendota Heights to trap, catch, snare t or otherwise restrain free movement of animals, wildlife or birds. i 2.3 Hunting. The pursuit of wild animals, birds or any form of wildlife involving the use of firearms or any other mechanical device or any use of physical force to bring down, restrain, harass, injure, maim or kill any such wild creatures. SECTION 3. VIOLATION Trapping and hunting anywhere in the City of Mendota Heights is prohibited. SECTION 4. EXCEPTIONS 4.1 The provisions of this ordinance shall not apply*to represen- tatives of the City, County, State or Federal governments who may in the course of their duties bei"required to use a:' -trap to trap, catch' 'snare, kill or otherwise restrain the free movement of any animal, wildlife or birds for humane or.other authorized purposes, or to such representatives, or teachers for school programs, or to scientists intending to identify animals, wildlife or birds and then returning them to their natural, environment. 4.2 The provisions of this ordinance shall not apply to persons who engage in trapping or hunting on their private property to prevent an unsafe condition or the waste or destruction (914) 1 a of their property when such persons have complied with other applicable provisions of the ordinances of this City and the laws of the State of Minnesota. SECTION 5. PENALTY Any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined a sum not to exceed Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) or shall be imprisoned for a period not to exceed ninety (90) days, or both. (914) 2 I I LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AND MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL NO. 320 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT JANUARY 1, 1984 - DECEMBER 31, 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE PAGE I PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II RECOGNITION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 III UNION SECURITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1, 2 IV EMPLOYER SECURITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2, 3 V EMPLOYER AUTHORITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 VI EMPLOYEE RIGHTS - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE. . . . . . . . 3 - 7 VII DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7, 8 VIII SAVINGS CLAUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 IX WORK SCHEDULES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8, 9 X OVERTIME PAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 XI CALL BACK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 XII STAND-BY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 S XIII LEGAL DEFENSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10, 11 XIV RIGHT OF SUBCONTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 XV DISCIPLINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11, 12 XVI SENIORITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 XVII PROBATIONARY PERIODS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 XVIII SAFETY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 XIX JOB POSTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12, 13 XX WAIVER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13, 14 XXI WAGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 XXII WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION. . . . . . . . . . . . 14 XXIII CLOTHING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 XXIV INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 XXV HOLIDAYS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 i y ARTICLE PAGE XXVI SICK LEAVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 XXVII FUNERAL LEAVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15, 16 XXVIII VACATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 XXIX WATER TOWER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 XXX DURATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 ii LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AND MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL NO. 320 ARTICLE I PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Mendota Heights, hereinafter called EMPLOYER, and Local No. 320, Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees Union. The intent and purpose of this AGREEMENT is to: 1.1 Establish certain hours, wages and other conditions of employment; 1.2 Establish procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning this AGREEMENT'S interpretation and/or application; 1.3 Specify the full and complete understanding of the parties; and 1.4 Place in written form the parties' agreement upon terms and conditions of employment for the duration of the AGREEMENT. The EMPLOYER and the UNION, through this AGREEMENT, continue their dedication to the highest quality of public service. Both parties recognize this AGREEMENT as a pledge of this dedication. ARTICLE II RECOGNITION The EMPLOYER recognizes the UNION as the exclusive representative under Minnesota Statutes, Section 179.71, Subd. 3 in an appropriate bargaining unit consisting of the following job classifications: Public Works Leadworker Public Works Building & Grounds Maintenance Worker Public Works Maintenance Worker Public Works Mechanic ARTICLE III UNION SECURITY In recognition of the UNION as the exclusive representative, the EMPLOYER shall: - 1 - 3.1 Deduct each payroll period an amount sufficient to provide the payment of dues established by the UNION from the wages of all employees authorizing in writing such deduction, and 3.2 Remit such deduction to the appropriate designated officer of the UNION. 3.3 The UNION may designate certain employees from the bargaining unit to act as stewards and shall inform the EMPLOYER in writing of such choice. 3.4 The UNION agrees to indemnify and hold the EMPLOYER harmless against any and all claims, suits, orders, or judgements brought or issued against the City as a result of any action taken or not taken by the City under the provisions of this Article. ARTICLE IV EMPLOYER SECURITY 4.1 The UNION agrees that during the life of this AGREEMENT, it will not cause, encourage, participate in or support any strike, slow down or other interruption of or interference with the normal functions of the EMPLOYER. 4.2 Any employee who engages in a strike may have his (her) appointment terminated by the EMPLOYER effective the date the violation first occurs. Such termination shall be effective upon written notice served upon the employee. 4.3 An employee who is absent from any portion of his work assignment without permission, or who abstains wholly or in part from the full performance of his duties without permission from his (her) EMPLOYER on the date or dates when a strike occurs is prima facie presumed to have engaged in a strike on such date or dates. - 2 - 4.4 An employee who knowingly strikes and whose employment has been terminated for such action may, subsequent to such violation, be appointed or reappointed or employed or re-employed, but the employee shall be on probation for two years with respect to such civil service status, tenure of employment, or contract of employment, as he (she) may have theretofore been entitled. 4.5 No employee shall be entitled to any daily pay, wages or per diem for the days on which he (she) engaged in a strike. ARTICLE V EMPLOYER AUTHORITY 5.1 The EMPLOYER retains the full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all manpower, facilities, and equipment; to establish functions and programs; to set and amend budgets; to determine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify the organizational structure; to t, select, direct and determine the number of personnel; to establish work schedules, and to perform any inherent managerial function not specifically limited by this AGREEMENT. 5.2 Any term and condition of employment not specifically established or modified by this AGREEMENT shall remain solely within the discretion of the EMPLOYER to modify, establish, or eliminate. ARTICLE VI EMPLOYEE RIGHTS - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 6.1 DEFINITION OF A GRIEVANCE A grievance is defined as a dispute or disagreement as to the interpretation or application of the specific terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT. 6.2 UNION REPRESENTATIVES The EMPLOYER will recognize representatives designated by the UNION as the grievance representatives of the bargaining unit having the duties - 3 - and responsibilities established by this Article. The UNION shall notify the EMPLOYER in writing of the names of such UNION representatives and of their successors when so designated. r 6.3 PROCESSING OF A GRIEVANCE It is recognized and accepted by the UNION and the EMPLOYER that the processing of grievances as hereinafter provided is limited by the job duties and responsibilities of the EMPLOYEES and shall therefore be accomplished during normal working hours only when consistent with such EMPLOYEE duties and responsibilities. The aggrieved EMPLOYEE and the UNION REPRESENTATIVE shall be allowed a reasonable amount of time loss in pay when a grievance is investigated and presented to the EMPLOYER during normal working hours provided the EMPLOYEE and the UNION REPRESENTATIVE have notified and received the approval of the designated supervisor, who has determined that such absence is S reasonable and would not be detrimental to the work programs of the EMPLOYER. 6.4 PROCEDURE Grievances, as defined by Section 6.1, shall be resolved in conformance with the following procedure: Step 1. An EMPLOYEE claiming a violation concerning the interpretation or application of this AGREEMENT shall, within twenty-one (21) calendar days after such alleged violation has occurred, present such grievance to the EMPLOYEE's supervisor as designated by the EMPLOYER. The EMPLOYER designated representative will discuss and give an answer to such Step 1 grievance within ten (10) calendar days after receipt. A grievance not resolved in Step 1 and appealed to Step 2 shall be placed in writing setting forth the nature of the grievance, the facts on which it is based, the provision or provisions of the AGREEMENT -4- allegedly violated, and the remedy requested and shall be appealed to Step 2 within ten (10) calendar days after the EMPLOYER designated representative's final answer in Step 1. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 2 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 2. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the UNION and discussed with the EMPLOYER designated Step 2 representative. The EMPLOYER designated representative shall give the UNION the EMPLOYER'S Step 2 answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days following the EMPLOYER designated representative's final Step 2 answer. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 3 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 3. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the UNION and discussed with the EMPLOYER designated Step 3 representative. The EMPLOYER designated representative shall give the UNION the EMPLOYER'S answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days following the EMPLOYER designated representative's final answer in Step 3. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 4 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 4. A grievance unresolved in Step 3 and appealed in Step 4 shall be submitted to arbitration subject to the provisions of the Public Employment Labor Relations Act of 1971. The selection of an arbitrator shall be made in accordance with the "Rules Governing the Arbitration of Grievances" as established by the Public Employment Relations Board. 6.5 ARBITRATOR'S AUTHORITY A. The arbitrator shall have no right to amend, modify, nullify, ignore, add to, or subtract from the terms and conditions of this -5- AGREEMENT. The -arbitrator shall consider and decide only the specific issue(s) submitted in writing by the EMPLOYER and the UNION, and shall have no authority to make a decision on any other issue not so submitted. B. The arbitrator shall be without power to make decisions contrary to, or inconsistent with, or modifying or varying in any way the application of laws, rules, or regulations having the force and effect of law. The arbitrator's decision shall be submitted in writing within thirty (30) days following close of the hearing or the submission of briefs by the parties, whichever be later, unless the parties agree to an extension. The decision shall be binding on both the EMPLOYER and the UNION and shall be based solely on the arbitrator's interpretation or application of the express terms of this AGREEMENT and to the facts of the grievance presented. C. The fees and expenses for the arbitrator's services and proceedings shall be borne by the EMPLOYER and the UNION provided that each party shall be responsible for compensating its own representatives and witnesses. If either party desires a verbatim record of the proceedings, it may cause such a record to be made, providing it pays for the record. If both parties desire a verbatim record of the proceedings, the cost shall be shared equally. 6.6 WAIVER If a grievance is not presented within the time limits set forth above, it shall be considered "waived". If a grievance is not appealed to the next step within the specified time limit or any agreed extension thereof, it shall be considered settled on the basis of the EMPLOYER'S last answer. If the EMPLOYER does not answer a grievance or an appeal thereof within the specified time limits, the UNION may elect to treat the grievance as denied at that step and immediately appeal the grievance to the next step. The time limit in each step may be r extended by mutual agreement of the EMPLOYER and the UNION. 6.7 CHOICE OF REMEDY If, as a result of the written EMPLOYER response in Step 3, the grievance remains unresolved, and if the grievance involves the suspension, demotion, or discharge of an employee who has completed the required probationary period, the grievance may -be appealed either to Step 4 of ARTICLE VI or another procedure such as: Civil Service, Veteran's Preference, or Fair Employment. If appealed to any procedure other than Step 4 of ARTICLE VI, the grievance is not subject to the arbitration procedure as provided in Step 4 of ARTICLE VI. The aggrieved employee shall indicate in writing which procedure is to be utilized -- Step 4 of ARTICLE VI or another appeal procedure -- and shall sign a statement to the effect that the choice of any other hearing precludes the aggrieved employee from making a subsequent appeal through Step 4 of ARTICLE VI. ARTICLE VII DEFINITIONS 7.1 UNION: The Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local 320. 7.2 EMPLOYER: The individual municipality designed by this AGREEMENT. 7.3 UNION MEMBER: A member of the Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local No. 320. 7.4 EMPLOYEE: A member of the exclusively recognized bargaining unit. 7.5 BASE PAY RATE: The employee's hourly pay rate exclusive of longevity or any other special allowances. - 7 - 7.6 SENIORITY: Length of continuous service with the EMPLOYER. 7.7 COMPENSATORY TIME: Time off the employee's regularly scheduled work schedule equal in time to overtime worked. 7.8 OVERTIME: Work performed at the express authorization of the EMPLOYER in excess of the normal work schedule in effect, (except for shift changes). 7.9 CALL BACK: Return of an employee to a specified work site to perform assigned duties at the express authorization of the EMPLOYER at a time other than an assigned shift. An extension of or early report to an assigned shift is not a call back. 7.10 STRIKE: Concerted action in failing to report for duty, the willful absence from one's position, the stoppage of work, slowdown, or abstinence in whole or in part from the full, faithful and proper performance of the duties of employment for the purposes of inducing, influencing or coercing a change in the conditions or compensation or the rights, privileges or obligations of employment. ARTICLE VIII SAVINGS CLAUSE This AGREEMENT is subject to the laws of the United States, the State of Minnesota, and the signed municipality. In the event any provision of this AGREEMENT shall be held to be'contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final judgement or decree no appeal has been taken within the time provided, such provision shall be voided. All other provisions of this AGREEMENT shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provision may be renegotiated at the request of either party. ARTICLE IX WORK SCHEDULES 9.1 The sole authority in work schedules is the EMPLOYER. The - 8 - normal work schedule shall not exceed ten (10) hours within a twenty- four (24) hour period, or forty (40) hours in a seven day period, (except for shift changes). The normal work schedule shall not involve a split work week. 9.2 Service to the public may require the establishment of regular shifts for some employees on a daily, weekly, seasonal or annual basis other than the normal work schedule. The EMPLOYER will give advance notice to the employees affected by the establishment of work days different from the employee's normal work schedule. 9.3 In the event that work is required because of unusual circumstances such as (but not limited to) fire, flood, snow, sleet, or breakdown of municipal equipment or facilities, no advance notice need be given. It is not required that an employee working other than the norml work day be scheduled to work more than the scheduled shift; however, each t employee has an obligation to work overtime or call backs if requested, unless unusual circumstances prevent him from so working. 9.4 Service to the public may require the establishment of regular work weeks that schedule work on Saturdays and/or Sundays. ARTICLE X OVERTIME PAY 10.1 Hours worked in excess of the normal work schedule in effect within a twenty-four (24) hour period (except for shift changes) or more than forty (40) hours within a six (6) day period will be compensated for at one and one-half (1 1/2) times the employee's regular base pay rate. Pay for the seventh (7th) consecutive day will be at double (2) times the employee's regular base pay rate, ARTICLE XII excluded. 10.2 Overtime will be distributed as equally as practicable. 10.3 Overtime refused by employees will, for record purposes under ARTICLE 10.2, be considered as unpaid overtime work. 10.4 For the purpose of computing overtime compensation, overtime hours a worked shall not be pyramided, compounded, or paid twice for the same hours worked. ARTICLE XI CALL BACK An employee called in for work at a time other than his (her) normal scheduled shift will be compensated for a minimum of two (2) hours pay at one and one-half (1 1/2) times the employee's base pay rate. ARTICLE XII STAND-BY Employees are expected to perform certain routine tasks on Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays; and in conjunction therewith, must be available for servicing emergency calls also. Stand-by duty pay shall be two (2) hours atlone and one-half (1 1/2) times base rate for each 24 hour period or major portion thereof. Compensation for performing routine tasks shall be one (1) hour at one and one-half (1 1/2) times base rate for checking of two (2) sewer stations and any other emergency duties. This combination of holiday and weekend compensation shall be at the minimum rate of five (5) hours at 1 1/2 times base rate for a one day holiday, a minimum of eight (8) hours at 1 1/2 times base rate for the combination Saturday/Sunday weekend, and eleven (11) hours at 1 1/2 times base rate for a three day weekend. ARTICLE XII LEGAL DEFENSE 13.1 Employees involved in litigation because of negligence, ignorance of laws, non -observance of laws, or as a result of employee judgmental decision may not receive legal defense by the municipality. - 10 - I 13.2 Any employee who is charged with a traffic violation, ordinance violation or criminal offense arising from acts performed within the scope of his employment, when such act is performed in good faith and under direct order of his supervisor, shall be reimbursed for reasonable attorney's fees and court costs actually incurred by such employee in defending against such charge. ARTICLE XIV RIGHT OF SUBCONTRACT Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall prohibit or restrict the right of the EMPLOYER from subcontracting work performed by employees covered by this AGREEMENT. ARTICLE XV DISCIPLINE 15.1 The EMPLOYER will discipline employees for just cause only. Discipline will be in the form of: (a) oral reprimand; (b) written reprimand; (c) suspension; (d) demotion; or (e) discharge 15.2 Suspensions, demotions and discharges will be in written form. 15.3 Written reprimands, notices of suspension, and notices of discharge to become part of an employee's personnel file shall be read and acknowledg`ed`by signature of the employee. Employees ani the IINION L ` V will receive a copy of such reprimands and/or notices. 15.4 Employees may examine their own individual personnel files at reasonable times under the direct supervision of the EMPLOYER. 15.5 Discharges will be preceeded by a five (5) day suspension without pay. J 15.6 Employees will not be questioned concerning an investigation of disciplinary action unless the employee has been given an opportunity to have a UNION representative present at such meeting. 15.7 Grievances relating to this Article shall be initiated by the UNION in Step 3 at the grievance procedure under ARTICLE VI. ARTICLE XVI SENIORITY Seniority will be the determining criteria for transfers, promotions and layoffs only when all other qualification factors are equal. ARTICLE XVII PROBATIONARY PERIODS 17.1 All newly hired or rehired employees will serve a six (6) months' probationary period. 17.2 All employees will serve a six (6) months' probationary period in any job classification in which the employee has not served a probatic?nary period. 17.3 At any time during the probationary period a newly hired or rehired employee may be terminated at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER. 17.4 At anytime during the probationary period a promoted or reassigned employee may be demoted or reassigned to the employee's previous position at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER. ARTICLE XVIII SAFETY The EMPLOYER and the UNION agree to jointly promote safe and healthful working conditions, to cooperate in safety manners and to encourage employees to work in a safe manner. ARTICLE XIX JOB POSTING 19.1 The EMPLOYER and the UNION agree that permanent job vacancies within the designated bargaining unit shall be filled based on the concept of - 12 - promotion from within provided that applicants: 19.11 have the necessary qualifications to meet the standards of the job vacancy; and 19.12 have the ability to perform the duties and responsibilities of the job vacancy. 19.2 Employees filling a higher job class based on the provisions of this ARTICLE shall be subject to the conditions of ARTICLE XVII (PROBATIONARY PERIODS). 19.3 The EMPLOYER has the right of final decision in the selection of employees to fill posted jobs based on qualifications, abilities and experience. 19.4 Job vacancies within the designated bargaining unit will be posted for five (5) working days so that members of the bargaining unit can be considered for such vacancies. 1 ARTICLE XX WAIVER 20.1 Any and all prior agreements, resolutions, practices, policies, rules and regulations regarding terms and conditions of employment, to the extent inconsistent with the provisions of this AGREEMENT, are hereby superceded. 20.2 The parties mutually acknowledge that during negotiations which resulted in this AGREEMENT, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect to any term or condition of employment not removed by law from bargaining. All ' agreements and understandings arrived at by the parties are set forth in writing in this AGREEMENT for the stipulated duration of this AGREEMENT. The EMPLOYER and the UNION each voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives the right to meet and negotiate regarding any and - 13 - a all terms and conditions of employment referred to or covered by this AGREEMENT, even though such terms or conditions may not have been f within the knowledge or contemplation of either or both parties at the time this contract was negotiated or executed. ARTICLE XXI WAGES 21.1 The following schedule of salaries shall represent the hourly base wage, exclusive of all supplemental pay, for employees under this contract for the duration of the contract. 1984 1. Maintenance Worker, $ 7.76 hired 1/1/84 or after 2. Maintenance Worker, hired before 1/1/84 3. Building & Grounds Maintenance Worker 4. Mechanic 5. Lead Worker ARTICLE XXII WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION 10.76 11.02 11.29 11.29 1985 $ 8.15 11.30 11.57 t 11.85 11.85 All maintenance workers and mechanics who are adjudged qualified by the EMPLOYER to operate the Case Loader -Backhoe, grader and leased tracked equipment will be paid an additional forty-seven cents (.47) per hour for those hours assigned to the unit. A maintenance worker hired on or after January 1, 1984, when operating the above mentioned equipment,will be paid at the rate of a Maintenance Worker hired before January 1, 1984, plus the forty-seven cents (.47) per hour differential. ARTICLE XXIII CLOTHING The EMPLOYER will furnish two (2) pair of coveralls for each employee on a repair or replacement basis, at the EMPLOYER'S option. - 14 - ARTICLE XXIV INSURANCE The EMPLOYER will contribute up to a maximum of one hundred forty-five dollars ($145.00) per month per employee toward health, life and long-term disability insurance during the calendar year 1984. The contribution for calendar year 1985 will be one hundred fifty-five dollars ($155.00) per month. ARTICLE XXV HOLIDAYS Eleven (11) paid eight-hour holidays are granted. Ten (10) conventional holidays are as follows: January 1, New Year's Day; 3rd Monday of February, President's Day; last Monday in May, Memorial Day; July 4, Independence Day; first Monday of September, Labor Day; second Monday of October, Columbus Day; November 11, Veteran's Day; fourth Thursday of November, Thanksgiving Day; Good Friday; December 25, Christmas. If January 1, New Year's Day; July 4, Independence Day; November 11, Veteran's Day; or December 25, Christmas, fall on Saturday, the preceeding Friday shall be considered a holiday. If January 'l, July 4, November 11, or December 25 fall on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be considered a holiday. The eleventh day, a floating holiday, will be granted, conditioned that scheduling arrangements must be approved by the supervisor at least two (2) days in advance of the floating holiday. ARTICLE XXVI SICK LEAVE Eight (8) hours per month granted, up to a maximum of 960 hours accrued. ARTICLE XXVII FUNERAL LEAVE All permanent employees, both full-time and part-time, may attend the funeral of their spouse, mother, father, children, brother, sister, mother-in- law and father-in-law as paid Funeral Leave. Such funeral leave shall not exceed twenty-four (24) hours and shall not be counted as sick leave. - 15 - All pefmanent employees, both full-time and part-time, may attend the funeral of their grandparent, brother-in-law, and sister-in-law, as paid funeral leave. Such funeral leave shall not exceed eight (8) hours and shall not be counted as sick leave. ARTICLE XXVIII VACATION j 28.1 Time is accrued according to the following schedule: Eighty (80) hours after one (1) year service, and eighty (80) hours per year through four (4) years of service; One hundred twenty (120) hours per year after five (5) years of service and one hundred twenty (120) hours per year through nine (9) years of service; Eight (8) additional hours per year after ten (10) years of service I with a maximum of one hundred sixty (160) hours after fifteen (15) years of service. 28.2 Employees may accrue vacation leave not to exceed a maximum of one I hundred sixty (160) hours. 28.3 No employee shall be permitted to waive vacation for the purpose of receiving double pay. ARTICLE XXIX WATER TOWER The EMPLOYER agrees that members of the bargaining unit shall not be required to ascend the ladder above the "drip ceiling" in the elevated water tower. ARTICLE XXX DURATION This AGREEMENT shall be effective as of January 1, 1984, and shall remain in full force and effect until December 31, 1985. In Witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT on this day of , 1984. FOR CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS: FOR MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW AND LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL NO. 320 Mayor City Clerk City Administrator - 17 - PROJECTS FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEKBER PARK ACQUISITION Park & Recreation Park & Recreation nduct Needs Finalize lana PublicMeeting; to Bond Referendum AND DEVELOPMENT Commission/Council Commission/Council Assessment, for possible promote bond issue. on Primary ballot Workshop to set Workshop. Bond issue. direction. RE: Wachtler avail. and developmen costa. STREET LIGHTING Update Report Adopt Plan Amend per Council Comments. LIQUOR ORDINANCE Council decide Legal opinion Council review Final draft to Final draft to Ordinance re- Council resolution Sunday Liquor Adoption of Sunday Liquor Adoption of on off-sale required changes Attorney Council scinding munici on Sunday liquor Election? Ordinance if Election? Ordinance if pal liquor passed. passed. Review requirements Revise draft Direction on changes (DD,KS) Sunday liquor Council adopt ordinance ELECTION Review Instruction Manuals and. Study State Review ongoing election process Study election Judges/Staff Primary Election Judges/Staff General Election Registrations changes & manual laws & review Training session Training session manual for Primary for General Order supplies Election Election General Prep. General Prep. REVISIONSCODE Review nuisance Council review ordinance and draft revisions draft revisions. of nuisance ord. (KS.DPM) NEWSLETTER Council review Publish Publish Publish Publish costs, format, edi- torial policy, etc. CITY HALL STUDY Department Head Compile data, Rough concept Determine associ- Draft report Submit final Develop direc- survey compare with '74 plan. Compare ated costs. (DD) comparisons needs report tions based on study (DD) to similar studies. to Council for Council direction 10/20 year Cost estimate Finance alter- Staff meeting direction use/size (DD) natives (LS,KS,KF ty PROJECTS FEBRUARY MARCtI APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER eeReview------- --------- ----- ---------------------------------- ----- ------------ (MAD,KS,PB,LS) .,Draft, City, Audit= ------------ ---------- Council 15th of May to 20th of June Review (KS,LS,KDF) BUDGET Assemble Budget--------------------------- Staff Review Final Forms to Draft Budget to Adopt Levy Forms Workshop Department Heads Council Resolution (KDF,KS,IS) Council input Council Review and Approval on Budget Priorities. M.A.C.Meet with M.A.C. Develop Marketing Plan — M.A.C. Receives Proposals--- Review Proposals Sale Award Plat Developments (LS,KF) (MAC and City) & Improvements Council Review Feasibility Study Trunk Highway 55 Corridor --------- and Approval FIRE DEPARTMENT Chief Applications Selections and Appoint Review Study Conducted Final Report to Adopt Recommen- New Officers in. Appointments Committee Council dations and take Office (KF,DD, New New Ordinance Council Review Officers) DOWNTOWN MENDOTA until/Planning Additional Meetings with other Council Decision Mn/DOT Response Commission on Downtown Study--- Study receive HEIGHTS Commission Joint Interested Parties on preferred (HD,JD,KF) and plan de - Workshop solution veloped (KF,JD,HD) COMPREHENSIVE Council Planning Planning Commission Planning Commission Council consider- Staff revision Submit to Incorporate Met PLAN Joint Workshop to Review and Comments Adoption, ation and comments Met Council Council's Comments Identify Issues & Council Adoption Set Policy Direc- (Public Hearing?) Adoption tion. (HD,KF,JD) Staff reports pre- pared and alterna- tives identified. Planning Commis- sion reviews. WATERAGREEMENT Review Draft, Meet with Saint Final Agreement Consider study pro- Study done by Review study results, and Negotiate new If wholesale, prepare and consult with Paul Water To Council posal from SEH for SEH decide on retail or wholesale Contract with implement operating changes. W.S.P. & Maplewood (if retail) Wholesale. St. Paul Water Wholesale Study (OJ.KF,EK,JD) TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT Establish goals Council/Staff and identify Worksession projects Hearings------------- W z Immo a C W I -- y W -44it:21f2 a H M a ,4 zd O3 )-.-. 3 HM3P. Z a w zaaaHw0 c, W V 3 -i V I, H N F z -t•'a O OM L) 3 - O avwrr�M3 W ¢ OP. O y CQ x a Hk cn P. //rnrt W a V W r1 H a • x aM 3 C) H H 0 V 0 4;40 Q1(4641 O `4 • w a 0 01'4 C) = H�r E_41 V z 0Z> r o a W .-7 S W H p a - H H • 0 H E1 -J M WV) e :.3 d W Z 7 H :..H a H 2 ,Z4 v; O WO r0n Mr o i cd Haq' da avwio ra W O W. ?' :per, OP, O W M W {re a La a P. n C H W a Hp; 0 E• Cl W a In W F• TOTAL AREA TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS CL' UJ C cc -J C 0 L)- J a vl W J O 1.cr W N -4 N I- O -J EXISTING ZONING SINGLE FAMILY PROPOSED ZONING 0 9 ACRES W cccr 3 F" W N NUMBER OF LOTS W O LU V W C Q C- V) W W C Q 4 C SEMI J v L7 LIU CX J W C al 0 NUMBER OF FUT U) W LI4-41 W to G CC J J - — •H1•••• - 068 006 016 = L- \ 1-- /^3-132,1f.�i EZ -13Z o 9 s AO b/I '3-N 31-11 30 WI MS 3H1 3O 3N11 A1a31410o5 --- nl\ I I 'I C — \ \ fr. '\,* ,. �- ____ — /./ ,, /, // -- /�, / �7 7,- 1 - / //// 1/1 , / , v� ,/m �) 1 ( ' I �/ ' //7 ` II rt --- 098 008 Ob8 oce 1 ' ,_ _ / _ I ( 1 ///7 / 1 ))\\\,, ( ., \( I , K\<‘<t , c-__: --- ',"•/://'-'-'-''', V I I ) 1 / , i / / ' JP' I / : ":., .,,,c,...., ....._,„........„7„--.7...___E-----z,' ..' i: ": ..,..--:_ylil ) , \ 1 , ,‘. ,i �)Of ( i 1 t ) / I\ \ . \N -KN.: -N. - r- - ' -----e--(it.c..,--- -- (k\ , 1/4 __ ______„. .._ __ . ..., ....„, ,\\,_.:...c.,\L„,„\\,s‘,,\\\ \ ( „_..\\*.,,.., 2.) i: 1:_,_.,..7:....--::::::-I-- --// '1-y7— ---1./:,.. "7"3/41.-----;c:"-- •„‘ '':lc.:N1/4---";-S-N::::\'1:4NHN:"<''t-ThNa--: .11 K\\\':':\ ..‘ ‘\\\ \ (9--------1\\\*\ )1 )7. c! i r ) .-...--T i , 1 ( \ , j------___----- ::..--'----',.-_,-,'%••=-$•>---`- , \ 1 \\\ \\\\\ \\‘\ \\ N\\\\\\\\\-*-\'K\\N\`‘`''N UI _- -- ,Iry 1 ----‘__—__-_-*.Q2--_,-------------1-' , \, , , ��, � �� t) � i iii i 11' �,' \;\� , — -1-- _ \• k\ I i I : / 1 / // ' jl 11 / �R, t 4I ; I i ///4 /////8/2/1–,\'Iji 1 \\\k ____ �\.' .\,0\i,\\\\\,,\(,` � I'�i :j�(�I 77�'l'� il Illi �\1� \ \1i1�\1' I 11 `II »zi/ I \ yvI1,II II1�1 S 14/�IIu�� I/ ;ill 1►,� �� ' ' (//'//iIiiiir/(%%7//,' / l Ii17(f ,, 'f If � 08L D U- r, / �f •_ 016�\��/ J _J C C N t 00 N N r I- i '1 �)i \`}i )))11/I/ ,')ISI 1 I lj'��II\`\�' ., (///i/r/i///1/11:L7./ii)/1/1,11/Piliiiillt1/4//17,/liiii,i (//////;;X"./2/////1/7/) /1 // // ' 2lII l� \\ � 062- —�� I , �1 �o I )1� �� I(( (I111\1\k N " \\\\\\\\\\\ m � /� � �`-�, , � � \ t 1i>> y \ (I I I III \1 � 1 I( l 7�iJI Qii/l�/irl \`�`t w L 1 f / ' . I I, �� /// ///,119/1/, ' ' ) �/ /jJ,t� �j, ¢. > Sr w oN GENERAL DESCR .4 U a N -C CU 3 C .>) •.- O 4 C) r•- - 1n 4- N N o 4J r0 Cl N i- d' Q1 QJ Cl r 4-1 rn C 3 O '-O v) H. 10 4-V)LO CU 4- °C CJ O 3 O Y _C O of N ^ Y Y C N CJ Q) 3 N 4- S L 4-) .•- C L O O >) O) N O O CJ O) r-• -14 CO L C -C O to C) v•�+-) N m C) C C C Q) o N 3 •r 4-) r0 .t1 O • Q) L V) CJ _C 0 4-) 0 O N 4-) 1-) • C) CJ Z C) C C) )O 4- N4_ 4- L -a L 2 V .r 0 3 t0 oU 0 c tUif E£ 4-) O 40 C) O .r r0 o CJ L I- L 73 Q) s- ea Rl ^ O L 4 - LEI L O -a Q) N- r O_4- -,- 0 L !.+ N -C 1.0 Cl C) r0 U CJ ^ 4) N U C ..0 C •r E • C +� 4-) 0 C b co %) 4- -O 3 N a- C O O O `\I 1 �� ) Ir',�\\Il 111 11 1�'L\\ 'l\ \ ; � I 1/11'!1 Ili i1�� v N l�,11/� ill/loll r ILIIIli HD 1 1�'I\\ I;I ►/\ � ) `v> IItut '1III��t i'\`IC �� Ii\ oA l i \ I 1 1 1 I SII 1111c21��1` d /l /-� />.v�- ,' .�a �/ / ►I► �'�(1(1 i"/lI1' \� \No 91 r.. coil I I� i I III \ H1\1t11 \ 1j111(� �� /i /HH») 4W/(i t�jl(/I \\\,\,) 1 rl ,\\\\*\))\\ \I\\\k,l((\tvi �I11� 1 j \\ �\\4\\\\\A1 \ �� `\ ,\ \� \;:\N\\\\\\\\A\AA I ) � , 1 1. '1 I \L'� , A fir"` � �r``c-:::'-±i/j/////////// ) \\\k\ "��w�� h\1 1 CiivN\ \ \\\`1`t2)1}i ��J� l /l\ I\\ 1\`C .\ \\ \ \ \ ; ' \ 1�N\tC \\ \\\I c:CP /(:\\:: \ \111`\: \ iiiiiii\i‘.:,\...:,,'\:.::.1,1:::\‘‘ `\ ta-�t� ��` \ \\i\��\I\ iN\):\ fi -\11: Sli i I\ '\\ \ \ ,\`� ��N-NN\\t\\,� \ti;lI\ ' k\\ \ \ ' -<' :: S ‘N' , \ �1 Ij \ ,\- / \\1•.0\\,\11, � iiiii � \ \� \,\, ` .� \ \\N\\� \ \,\\,,\, ;\��,\\\\\\\\\\\ �\�k `,\�,�\ � V\ \\‘\\ ILII\1j'Il�!' \\ \C�� \\ \\`�` ` \� �\ \� . III 1111 �� I(llll o z� \ \\\:\ \.N\.\:\ �� \\t‘ \;\‘‘ \\\\�\,��,/ I 1 I (;11; /7S1)1\1111)1111111��1 O J O O p 1 o O O 0 0 Cr) co CO I'1 rico CJ – O co CD p C>7 CJ Cl .r .0 C) I-- •.- V r0 4 O C) L C O U Cl C) N N C) O r0 CU C -C Q b C W • r N 1..) i-+ C) C L C) r0 aJ O)4 - N • r O v4-in>,CroQJO • O_c Y r✓ W = I n n r.- .0 C .r n +) O) 0 3 CJ )n C 1.) N .r O C C c 4-) (A Cu C) U L 4-1 L N 3 2rQ1 3 L O C) 0• m . C O ;n C O) (0 4'+'C 4-) C C O Cu +) V Q1 L'•r L Y O) rert •r N N at 4- • �--• V) -i- ce-. 4- O r0 10 r W Z J PROPERTY >- 3 0 H x 0 cc H W W CC H rn ca PROPOSED LOT LINES EXISTING LOT LINES SANITARY SEWER LU LL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN EXISTING WATER MAIN FUTURE STORM SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER • LAS EXISTING 2' CONTOURS tn EXISTING 10' CONTOURS ccw 0 Lu STREET GRADES ELEVATIONS / GC Ul LaJ 66.1 4.1 0 10 0 wag 00 Cra 00 661 CC to 0 0 Cn MARCH 19, NIHON O C L 'O T4- N 'o '0 L O +2 +) C O ' - 4) C O N L C C) 17 L O N +-I - 10 L Cl Cl N • o (0 in O 10 a C C CJ V C (-.4) 4-01 C 24- Tv CA L CO C C O 0 O L +-' -" O. 01 O Y C^ -. 01 .• .-. N N r r N O •0 4-) 0 I- 7^ E 4- co 10 +..3 10 I% O i� J .0 C O O L 4- a U 3 CO 0 0 7 +-• L O O C) I fV Q L O -• +✓ N a +--) to 4. r 1-- - Y 3 3 L T N O Ln V) C N '0 10 O N L 4- 1 t0 I- C) (0 C) N C O -• V C +-I O 4-' 2 L +--1 +-) ^ N 7 L • C7 -' O 10 C 7 Cl 10 0 0 L 0) O 01--• C) 10 C +) V C O -- a WS- lO U N • U 4-' O CO Y L 2 C) C O LC/ C in L C) L L 10 - T V ▪ a C) 10 N a01 N O C +-) C) 7 -+ 0 O L L Q .- L -O C Y CO L O F-• 0 10 C) C --+ C L C) U' 4- N N • - 7 r --• 10 Y Y - a L N C) C 7 N in Q! •--• CJ 0.0.0 O - (0 V O C) O Y X N 4- 01++ '^ 4- 0- 0) 3 3 (0 W 7 •-• +) 0 +) +-)C V J 4-4 C) V (0 -' +) i LI no 2 1.) i >1 N C 7 C) L L 4- N .-+ •-• N O 10 C) (0 4) 3 0 +) --• 10 ^ a C 7 a ri c a.-• L z Y .0 o 10 S- 4-4 N E N +) 4- L V 7 N .N V O L 0 L O 0 N O a •-• 01 V 10 U T O L V N L C V' CI- Y Z 4-' +) Y L +) ••-• 10 CO O L N-. (0 0 X L +) V O) C) O 4- C) 1O ^ 4- C C) 0 O (0 a L O 3 C a 0-J • N +-) 0) 0 4- 0 10 0) N --. +) 1- L 01 Li 0 -^ C V 4-4 C -•-• E L a 4- O C C 3 r 0 4- C L • -• O 0+) ••• S- (0.0 0 (0 N 0•-•+-) J f'0 L TC) 7L N C) r C) 4- (0 ^ a C a N C T N - 0 L •-• 7 a) 4- C 10 10 S. - VI N C ..• 10 O - N T O N 0 .-+ 17 a) C) 10 L L Y 10 C) C 10 C) r - U .. y .-• U 1 +2 N > +) L T "•-• V) (0 L N O N O - L a) 4- C 4- I- .ti +-) (J) C C) 3 W 7 O N C O 10 4- z V LTj 0 3 U) N+)+) 3 a0 W O O CO)(') C N E Ln NZ O)•• L+)N O O C) N 3 0 L W N C +) +.' L • .0 Y E N 1O V C) .y' Q-0 --- ••• 7 0 0 0 10 O C) ^ N a 0- C 3 3 O a 0)Z O O N C --'. O 0 N 10 O in C 4-) --• 10 +) C) L 0) L W 4-3 ^ o O 10 T -o C) ••-• L Y 10 a VI L^Y O LO_ (0 C) C) 3+) 0) W 0) 0 0 L 4-4 3 E'0 (1) L +1 N 2 •-• Y 4- (0 4-) - L 10 L C L O L +) F- C) O +) 4- C (0) N -0 +) --• O C O .•-' 2 O0 4- O+ '. C -0 4-4 > L L N O i 2 a) 10 O1 C L T m C a+) a) N O L C • 7 10'a n O O C Y O Z C) Y C) •-+ T n. C Z +) L4- C L L +) +)4J^ - 10-0 W O)a0•-• 10 VCO 10 V 1O co c a^^ C) E C r a 10 N N O C O O --• 10 L C ..--• -0 (1) N N 0 • ' L L +) 0) J X C C) 4- Y O 0. L 7'O S7 N N O L .--+ J C) 10 01 0 10 r •-• C) (0 O C) L C O VI W J 10 L L Y U >417 N O O Z S.- 0) a) Y L N C .0 0 C C7 C) _c +' C) +' -' +) C '-• CO O 0 a+) O .0 O r0 C L 10 ^ 0 3 > L N L L N • -• a L 3 0 ♦) ^ 0 0 4- CO (1) --• 7 10 Y (0 O Y I- 0 E V) Q V) I- O 2 L (o 0. a. N 4--) LEXINGTON VICINITY MAP SCALE IN FEET PARTNERSHIP LEXINGTON HEIGHTS L C) C N - c1 l0 L GJ C O " NORTHLAND T T A> .0 0 O N + +2 --•L E CI ,.. J C) S 10 N 4 C C 4- 0 0 0 0 ✓ Y >,L 014- (0 0 C ^ - Z . • 10 X L 4- O Cl 0 J -0 L4- C C) 0 0 C +I L - L (1) 1O CO C 4-I C- +- 0 L N N ^ 10 C) (00- C L s- C +� O •--� .... C •O S O C! S- E E L7 O `•- C 0 (1) - 0) S.- >4 0 N O 0) 3 4- ..-• O 10 C) ..-..0 .-. .0 CY 4' C) 0 • -L C) 1Y (0+) 'OCT) Y N O L O a) N a) E C) 0 3 (0 C C O 1-0 C 7 C Y TE - V n a 10 4- • •• - 0 L N N 10 01 N L 3 01 3 O (0 C 4-) -• Y C L O a) (0 E 3- 7 L 0 Q Z +-) L -' F- •-• 03-C Ln W c E W Z 7 ••• Z Z 01 J Z W C f 0 N... W C)1 O L W O O N 4- N O i i 10 L > O O --• C) W F- 4- C V C I- Z +-r O +) Q C) O S. N S- CJ O 1b N 10 Lno F- �.-Q a tV • CZ c;; •- l N�wOL,7.E o$/ 8 O )A 0 inC C C O C a N O C) C L- C • •--• C•-+ a) a X O 0 T S a MInnesota T 4- C 0 IV a T E ,o 0 V C) 0) CO 0I Y i 0 N C L '0 - L a) E S- 0 0 -10 O 0) N 3 0 C V 10 N 10 3 .0 corporation. 10 N Y- C V 0 C) CO E 01 7 L (0 Q z +-' N C) O 0_ C W Z C Z Z 01 0 Z W C 2- C r 0 0 LL 0 Li O C) +, O S- 0 0 L W I- 4- 0 F -- < -G O O rd) 1- O .0 V)C) - 10 e -Z< -Y'72 i�£7 ;de -p-/MN do grin turo9 '-, ^ :,017.LZ obs9 5! 0 C) C C T 4-' C 7 0 C a N O C S- C C --• O a X O • O 0 7 rc6•btrc r-- cn a„c7Z,N I• / 1I ¢/Zi£09 ON 70Q ZZ riga. V '00 j' 5.16b1E 'ON 70C YSdsH 1N)JW Sd 2' '.t+9S 1dOE 1 __13,."2 'Z. obeN 0•5e- w w LEXINGTON Q O ge oS /()o(/V N 5rc . t/ Mr do 27,/ MN AC r>t'a-.'Y QI 1 10 N L ^ ✓ 0 +2 --� 0 T +-+ - L 0 >>+2 (0 V a > L C •--� L +-I 7 .0 N 7 0 7 N -n a L 4 4- 0) 0 O i L 0 V 0 C N4 -.ti 0 N N 4- 10 +-+V '0 0 7 C (1) 4- 0 (0 • C O ^ ••• 0 O L •.-• N L U +-) L N 10 Y 3 O N '0 +) C C! (0 0 O L L C T N V Y 4) C) C W L L L C - L 0 O O. C 10 T 0. O 3 C) O L a O O > L C L L L CO a 4-) b N 4) 7 U C • O Cl O Y N +4 C C1 L L O N 0 - 4) L C) +) 0) C 0 4- - t L (0 0 ▪ U C L C) C) C 74-'L 4-4 10 --, O N - C) 4-) L -0 C) N 10 N 4-) O) C C L C -- (0 '0 3 7 C) C. •-• C) 0 0 aL+) V 10 J✓ 10 N 0 J C 0) ^ '0 ac C a N (0 .--• 10 +) N a) O C) --• c O L C N TL 0 C) +) 10 T O O 4) V L L C > C 10 C +2 S- S- L 3 ^ O 10 -• 7 (0 O a L S V) L L -0 a) 4- N T O L a +) +J > - T+) (0 0 T z --• V C L O +-) C) 0)_v •-• O L • UI •- I- aL ) N4-3 +-) CO L V _v C (0O 0 0) L Q U C T'^ C) •-• N V) O) C) +) (1) TI- L -CO U0 4- 2 (0 C) CO O L (1) +.) .-• N > L .0 L LU a) 1O 0 C) 2 U L V 0 U C N 10 N C) TO Y 4) L N d t- N C 10 >, 0) U' C) (0 t z E N 3 O 7 a) L L X --• C C O) W---• o .r .... ^ J 1 0 E L S- '0 '0 Al N O -• O > +-) 0 0) 7 L a) Y a 5- r0 10 a Y 10 10 N -0 4--) 0 C T +) 10 0 - (/) O (0 O U Y • C C O 'Cr C 10 N CO C (1.1 r .... C V C O S-- +.) 0 +)O +)+- C lO T 10 ^ Y 7 tl N 7 7 L N O 7 7 V no R) 0 01+-) a o > +-1 Y O C 10 L 0 O aV 0. 4- (0 T 0 +2 N C 1O 7 S- 3 3 0 0 4- V C 0 Z 0 O rO T •-• +) N 10 F 0 N I-, Y O o E C) O E Q 0 O V n L )0 = O CO 0 W i 2 +) 10 L C 0+) Z 10 CO OZ0 L N 77 a 1 O L r - tlt L t a + O m 940 x w 0 Woo-- J c O C 10 4- O N O Ln O+-) 4- +) L!) 7 0 (0 - L 0 0) a O N C N O.-• N a i Y • 11a a) L L T O F- U n E a) a 7 4- monument C) +) 0 O O • C) N C C) 0 J 10 N +-) •+ 0 L N 4-4 O C O C E -• Q1 L O s- 4- 4- 0 O T ▪ C) > -0 C- a) O CT V) '0 a,0 -• C 3 'o 0 J C Y - U Cr (0 S- 4.4 N 10 0 3 0 V C O • 44-) at 10 T U L -. L 4- '0 •-• J +) L T C)n (-3 N •7 - OD L 0) 0 •- T C) 4 Z ^• s- o O n_ 7 V) W V) W 2 0) z Lu C .,z.4 0 La. 01 L+. 0 Cl) O :- Y O W 4- I- Q O O 1 -OL 'n V Chairman, County Board L V 4- U O O O C Y E L 1L (0 C on = E - v1 ^ alsal N -1 C +) u1 4-1 O co C-) O O ,.) C +) 3. M O 4) (NI u O N C) Cs L • O LY Z.. Y O C) C C 4-' C 7 0 C a N C) C) C S- CC •-• O 0- a) C) V C 0 e N 7 N E T E L 0 m 0 +' O T - z transfer entered this C 0 O 7 7.3 O x 1a N cr Y C C) 7 C a as m 001 Z r 0 C 7 O V T Y V O L 4-' 5 - a) I_ O 4- O • T l0 (0 -0 0 115-> T .0 O 0 L L O a T (1) a (0 L 1O S 4-) (0 C Y 0 0 4-1 O (0 C L C S T 4 4-, Y Y C) L Q C) T 2 L 0) .0 L +2 O) O L '0 C O 0) •oS al 4- 3 0 L T n yds - co ecs Cbi 0 C Document Number L 0 4- L O Y L U 0 O V a) of - O T 0 C 7 0 V O L 4- 0 0) 0+) 0 4- 4- 0 .4 - CO c0 4 - O Ch 0 L r O 4- N 3 0 +✓ o C O co E C 7 -• i C 'O 4- a) O 0 L T O N eO -• -o w L L Y T 10 7 L N T 10 -3 N S- ---. L L C O +2 10 V C T 0 • n f 0) L L C) o L U 1- >1 4-1 s+ g >0 O a U a• raC O c N 0 N Nag 113 (11 a• Po • 0 >I 0 V N U ni N 1a 4)) +) ro v CO C 0 I -I r+ N X 00. 0)100) a 0 v) -) Y O O C C S i 0) s- T i o C c U 0 O O • V T (0 C O 7 Y 0 10 O LAND SURVEYORS PRELIMINARY COPY