1984-02-07CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Zi AGENDA
FEBRUARY 7, 1984, 7:*30 P.M.
1. Call to Order.
2. Roll Call.
3. Approval of Minutes, January 17'. January 24, January 31.
4, Consent Calendar:
a. Approval of Renewal of Home Beauty Shop License.
b. Acknowledgement of Memo on:Veighborhood Crime Watch.
c.. Acknowledgement of Code Enforcement monthly report for January.
d. Acknowledgement of minutes of January 19th Park and Recreation
Commission meeting.
e. Acknowledgement of letter f7 M din TH 149/,1-494
tnDf T re
.,gar
interchange.
f. Approval of the list of licenses.}
g. Approval of the list of cigarette licenses.
h� Approval of the list of rubbish hauler licenses.
i. Approval of the List of Claims.
5. HEARING
a. Case No. 83-34, Callahan -- Application for Wetlands Permit.,
(See attached Planning Commission minutes, reports from Public
Works Director and Planner and Feasiblity Sudy)., 7:30 P.M.
3/6
6. Public
a. Mr. Fred Lambrecht Presentation of Petition from Friendly Hills -iAk
Civic Association re: EaZan Race/Track Site.
J!.' )re. f , 4��, �
7. General Business
Mayor and Council Members
a. Recommeog a ation
ppointTept to Planning Commission (see attached mem0
�request for attendance at National League of
Memo
b. on ouncilmembe
Cities Conference. AA
tr
Staff
a. Memo on City Hall Lease.
b. Memo orf'FireChief nd ss stant Fire Chief job descriptions.
4 ffi� . 4AWML-r-
C. Memo ind proposed resolution on tH i10/Delaware Avenue traffic signals.
?s
d. Evergreen Knolls feasibility st dy.
If/. I
e. Memo on Th' 110 Traffic�S Ignl �Vys-tem.
C-
.e�
February 7, 1984 Agenda
8.
f. Memo and proposed resolution on Mn/DOT Mendota Heights Road/TH"149
Construction Agr ement.
Memo on m' eet3n f is ecinct caucus.
g g I'i2u,, f'i /w
h. Memo and proposed�amendment t
o Council procedures ordinance
i. Memo from Chif Delmont on Receipt of Donation. /¢
Adjourn.
V/1
, J- , "�— 1'7, � � —7'�'
3 0 Z-.1ta �k/
l ��
6� - /0,,576
LIUPL IU-yami.n UepL :3u-xas3riage
• 15-Engr 60-Utilities
20-Police 70-Parks
02/07/84 CLAIMS LIST CHECK R cGI S TcR 30-Fire 80-Planning
40-Code Enfc 90-Animal Control
AVOUNT VENDG ITEM DESCPIPTION ACCOUNT NO* IN'
25.00 AQUARIUS HTG RFD DUP LIC FEE 01-3140-000-OC
25.00 *i
2.500.00 BRIGGS&MORGAN RE T BOS 110183 16-4226-000-GO
1 ,800.00 BRIGGS&MOPGAN Fit I BOS 860M 74-4226-000-00
49300.00
*i
108.36 DAKOTA CTY HUY CEPT CITY SH NSP 01-2010-000-00
108.36 *�
35.00 CAKOTA CTY C%1 ASSM 84 DUES C1-44C4-020-20
35.00 *i
103.23 DYTRON ALLOYS CORP DYTRON 01-4305-050-50
51.62 DYTRON ALLOYS CORP DYTRON 91-4305-070-70
51.61 CYTRON ALLOYS CORP DYTRON 15-4305-060-6.0
206.46 *i t
12*50 CHANNEL CCNST CC RFD 1/2 DEPOSTT 74-4283-813-00.
12.50
130.37 ALEXANDER MFG BATTERY C'1-4305-020-20
130.37 +�
50.37 F'AUL DREELAN RPR/PARTS Fp DOOR 01-4335-31
50.37 `:'
106.26 r'.LECTRONICCNTR IivG.. _- DURACELL BATTERIES G1-4305-030-,3U=
106.26 *� -
17.19 EMERGENCY SVC SYS CLUTCH KIT 01-4330-440-2;tj.
17.19 *i - - -
60.00 I C BO 84 DUES 01-4404-040-40
60*00
25.00 KUMAR MECHANICAL PFD 84 LIC 01-3140-000--D!Z-
25.00
1 41_..81: #4t lk
1 55.. 74,_�-UX-O;�L�TGkT.`IR,G'pR r t�L.ES SH GP... _ _ - . ,01.;!!4335-310-50
155:74 A ;`; 'TC"UXOR L I TIN ° P�iOD " l�L6S SHOP 01=4V3 35-31 0-7*0
155.74 LUX03 LIGHTING PROD _BULBS SHOP 15-4335-310-60
467.22 *__
280.25 PAYMASTERSYS TEM 85 MTCN PAYMASTER 31 -1215 -000 -OC
280.25 PaYMASTERSYSTEM 84 MTCN PAYMASTER 01-4330-490-10
560.50 *—
CHECK REGISTER
i
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. II
45.00
MN ST FIRECH ASSN
84 DUES
01-4404-0'_ 31
45.00
*--
90.90
MN ST FIRE DPT ASSN
84 -DUES
01-4404-030-31
'
90.00
*�
250.00
GEORGE MC NEILL
RFD ESC
01-2147-000-0(
250.00
*�
121.50
CITY MENDOTA HGTS
REIMS PC PO CUTS
01-1021-000-0(
121,50
*�
19,900.00
ADC 4
CITY SH 84BUDGET
23-4490-000-0(
1 ,900.00
+�
43.92
PAPER CALMENSON
PARTS
01-4330-490-5C
43 .9 2
35.00
SAFETY SYSTEMS INC
REGR DELNONT
07-4490-000-0(
35.00
*�
100.00
SMITH OFFICE EQ
84 MTCN CONTR
01-4330-490-1(
100.00
SMITH OFFICE EQ
84 MTCN CONTR
.01-4330-490-2(
50.00
SMITH OFFICE EQ
84 MTCN CONTR
05-4330-490-1.
250..00
✓
•-1 21 ..90
WI TECH CORP
COMP TUT CRIA LS
01-4620-11,-l(
1..
000
:I C M A �..'
a -el .00
277..5
RELIABLE PEBUILOERS
RPR/PAINT FRND/PkNEL"'.1
01-4330-440-2C
277.85
*_
40.00
QCCHAMBER COMM
LUNCH 1/26 NTG
01-4490-110-1(
40.00
*�
7.11
FIRE RELIEF ASSN
HO CR
06 -1115 -000 -OC
151.62
FIRE RELIEF ASSN
DELQ TAX
06 -1115 -000 -OC
•189352.00
FTRE RELIEF ASSN
STATE AID
06 -2010 -000 -OC
177.82
FIRE RELIEF ASSN
FISCAL OISPARIT.IES`--
06 -2010 -000 -OC
2,631_.60
FIRE RELIEF ASSN
-`
HO CR ,�s",:y..:_: _.;_."06
-2010 -000 -OC
„vFi3RE RELI�EF .AS.S . ..,DE
QTA X
Fl-,RE RELIEF ASSN
TAXLEVY ==" �'r
06-2010-000-0.0
299227.05
*-
+t`s 4TM.....•.' -
`:h. •.. �- , .J,:i vi..... ....
. :::.Yia.'WT+,'.:-� 4�� ri* tia3'�•.•�-: � �.
18.48
A T&T TNFO SYSTEMS
JAN LSE EO
01-4210-020-2C
5.32
A T&T INFO SYSTEMS
JAN LSE EO
01-4210-0' 5C
20.21
A T&T INFO SYSTEMS
JAN LSEEQ
01-4210-0 7C
6.30
A T&T INFO SYSTEMS
JAN LSE -EQ
01-4210-315-3C
5.33
A T&T INFO SYSTEMS
JAN LSE EQ
15-4-210-060-6C
MOIL NIT
55.64
9.53
299*80
25 .6 3
8.50
27.90
371 .36
32 o60
4.58
4.59
7,?45,00
8,235.00
5 .3 0
4.59
125.00
591 .78
7,975.00
24 9? 23 o-43
..413 .16
16
14.00
141.75
61.76
13.11
23.21
13.00
5.80
273.53
22.73
22..-73- -.
22.73
2*?3-
22.73
10.18
91.30
21 .05
112.35
I CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR, ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV*
E&J
AUTO
SPLY
MI SC
PARTS
01-4330-440-20
0;
B&J
AUTO
SPLY
BATTTER
2287
01-4330-460-30
0'
B&%J
AUTO
SPLY
MMISC
PARTS
01-4330-490-50
0-
B&J
AUTO
SPLY
SEAL
BEAM
01-4330-490-50
0
B&J
AUTO
SPLY
MISC
PARTS
15-4330-490-60
09
80
WATER
COMMISSION
4TH
QTR83
01-2010-000-00
CORR ,PR -O G �4_01�-4305-490-50
- I
BD
WATER
COMMISSION
ot:c
Svc
01-2010-000-00
TO COAST
BD
WATER
COMMISSION
DEC
SVC
�01-2010-000-oc
BD
WA TER
COMM IS SI ON
8*3
FIRE HPDR RENTAL
01-2010-000-00
21
BD
WATER
COMMISSION
84
FIRE HYDR RENTAL
01-4200-470-30
2"
BD
WATRER
COMMISSION
HYDRANT
USE
01-4425-470-70
24
60
WATER
COMMISSION
D --EC
SVC
15-2010-000-00
8D
WATER
COMMISSION
WATER
READINGS
15-4305-060-60
24
80
WATER
COMMISSION
Df -C
FNGR TIME
74-4231-813-00
2--
80
WATER
COMMISSION
SVC
CONN KINGSLEY
74-4460-813-00
2 --
CASE POWER &.EbUIP
CITY MOTOP SUPPLY
CITY 'MOTOR SUPPLY
CITY MOTOR SUPPLY
CITY MOTOR SUPPLY
CITY- MOTOR SUPPLY
CITY MOTOR SUPPLY
CITY MOTOR SUPPLY
-MOT CR 2t
SWITCH AC i_ _01-4330-440-20 1
FILTERS/CHAINS 01-4330-440-20 li
BATTERY 01-4330-445-40 1
PARTS 01-4330-445-40 li
FILTERS -01-4330-490-50 11
FILTERS/LENS 01-4330-490-70 li
FILTERS 15-4330-490-60 1-4
COAST
TO COAST
misc SPLY.-, 01-4305-050-50
31
COAST
TO COAST
CORR ,PR -O G �4_01�-4305-490-50
- I
31
COAST.
TO COAST'
mlscspt:y,s-* -" 01-4305-490-50
31
COAST
TO COAST
MOP HANDLE/HEAD, 15-4305-060-60
31
COPY
FOUID CO
SPL YS 05-4300-10 5- 15
61
CCFY
EQUIP CO
SPLYS 05-4300-105-15
7(
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NG. 11
37,40 DANIELSON JAMES E DEC/JAN VT 05-4415-11.
37.40 *--
332.97 DAVIS ELECTRONIC SVC DEC RPRS 01-2010-000-0(
332.97 *,-
19125.00 OCR CORP* FEBRENT 01-4200-600-1(
637,50 OCR CORP* FEB RENT 01-4200-600-2(
1070.0P DCR CORP* FEB RENT 05-4200-600!--1,'
2,932.50 *,
90.00
FRAZELL KEVIN
DENNIS DELMONT
FEB
MILEAGE
01-4415-021-2(
90.00
REIMBURSEEXPENSE
01 -4490 -110 -IC
?32.33
25.00
EXECUTONE SYSTEMS
JAN
TEMP PH
01-4210-110-1(
25000
>Pi�Ajj- ON
DRU
M ZR -01-1-210-000-0(
415.0,0
GOA CORPORATION
F7PST NATL-!ST PAUL
FEE
83 GC IROS`
-74 -4,2 -26 -Q0.0 -0C
15 QO
_03; __
53
ICMA RC
1120
PR
01 -2072 -000 -OC
74.03
TC VA PC
23'w!5O,_
CONTR
FISCHER-S GAS -66-
H E' A D
LA Iv P §,.;zw.Z tt- �_:_3 O:-4 4 0 2 C
23.50
*--
175.00
FRAZELL KEVIN
FEB
MTLEAGE
01-4415-110-1(
57.33
FRAZELL KEVIN
REIMBURSEEXPENSE
01 -4490 -110 -IC
?32.33
>Pi�Ajj- ON
DRU
M ZR -01-1-210-000-0(
GOA CORPORATION
OIL
01-1210-000-0[
39905
_03; __
53
ICMA RC
1120
PR
01 -2072 -000 -OC
74.03
TC VA PC
1/20
CONTR
01-4406-1" 1
127.88 -
i` OUNT
CHECK REGISTER
VE NDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
5.50 KAT KEYS KEYS
5.50 */
"t.22
KULLANDER
GUY
RPRS
FLASHER/ARM
.88
KULLANDER
GUY
MI THRU
211
3.74
KULLANDER
GUY
MI ST PAUL
WTR
5.72
kULLANDER
GUY
MI THRU
211
.019
KULLANDER
GUY
MI THRU
211
5.06
KULLANDER
GUY
MI THRU2
/1
-08-
KULLANDER
GUY
CORR BATCH
7.60
5.94
KULLANDER
GUY
MI THRU
2/1
1.54
KULLANDEP
GUY
MI THRU
211
4.62
KULLANDER
GUY
MI THRU
2/1
35.72 *i
HDWE
PARTCH SAW
13Q.10 *�
?05.10
LAHASS MFG&SALES INC
HOUSING
KIT
154.10-
LAHASS MFG&SALES INC
RETD HSG
51.00
'
26.48
LAKELAND
=ORD
FLASHER/ARM
26.48 *�
LN.CIT
HP
PLAN
z
LMCIT
HP-
DLAN
F -B
PREM
LMCIT
HP
47.83
LANGULA
HDWE-:r'-•'=''F!LTC
L NCIT
RS/PELL ETS
95.92 _
LANGULA
HDWE
�.�;, .. ..,..,,.SHOVELS -,
39.46-
LAn!GULA
.:
HDWE '
�.=r
OCT/DEC DISC
7.60
LANGULA
HDWE
FILTERS/PELLETS
14.91
LANGULA
HDWE
BULBS
1.30
LANGULA
HDWE
APART 307
10.00
LANGULA
HDWE
PARTCH SAW
13Q.10 *�
144.40 LELS FEB. DUES
144.^0 *, -
97,50 01-4 402-11 0-10
0-
5 '02-
310 :0 o
-
ACCOUNT N0. INV -
15 -4305-060-60 31
05-4330-490-15
05-4415-10 5-1 5
15-4415-060-60
16-4415-850-00
23-4415-000-00
23-4415-000-00
23-4415-000-00
26-4415-942-00
74-4415-81 3-00
87-4415-812-00
01-4330-490-50 B2
01-4330-490-50 B2
01-4330-490-50 44
01-4305-030-30 27
,01-4305-030-30 27
01-4305-030-3.0
01-4305-030-30'.27
01-4305-030-3( 27
01-4330-490-50 22
01-4330-49'0-70 29
01-2075-000-00
5:02-
310.00
56.69
135.00
56.69
01-2074-000-00
01-4245-020-20
01-4245-021-20
01-4245-040-40
01-4245-050-50
LN.CIT
HP
PLAN
z
LMCIT
HP-
DLAN
F -B
PREM
LMCIT
HP
DLAN
FEB
PREM
L NCIT
HP
DLAN
FEB
PREM M
LmCIT
HP
DLAN
FEB
PREM
01-2074-000-00
01-4245-020-20
01-4245-021-20
01-4245-040-40
01-4245-050-50
AMOUNT
552.46 *.--
A.50
8 .50
8.50
25.50
5,469.75
21,742.44
27,212.19
16.15
11.0
5.00-
10.00
32.05 *�
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
LEEF BROS INC
LEEF BROS INC
LEEF BROS INC
PETRO WASTE CONTROL
METRO WASTE CONTROL
MINN RENEFIT ASSN
FINN BENEFIT ASSN
MINN BENEFIT ASSN
MINN BENEFIT ASSN
MINN FIRE INC
MINN FIRE INC
MINN_MUTUAL LIFE-
MINN MUTUAL LIFE
4 I16 .MUTUA L LIFE
FINN MUTUAL LIFE
MINN MUTUAL LIFE
MINN MUTUAL LIFE
MINN MUTUAL LIFE
ITEM DESCRIPTION
JAN SVC
JANSVC
JAN SVC
JAN SAC CHGS
FEB INSTALL
FEB PREM
FEB PREM
FEB PREM
FEB PREM
SPL YS
GLOVES/MITTS
FEB
55.75
FEB
2,91 .00
FE B'
'346.75 *�
FEB
PREM
FE'B
PREM
FEB
7680
FEB
7.80
3 9 ,
-
1.Q5
-
5.,R5
:.
5.R5
SVC
1.95
"' NO.R.THERN" ST PCG ER CO
35.10 *�
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
LEEF BROS INC
LEEF BROS INC
LEEF BROS INC
PETRO WASTE CONTROL
METRO WASTE CONTROL
MINN RENEFIT ASSN
FINN BENEFIT ASSN
MINN BENEFIT ASSN
MINN BENEFIT ASSN
MINN FIRE INC
MINN FIRE INC
MINN_MUTUAL LIFE-
MINN MUTUAL LIFE
4 I16 .MUTUA L LIFE
FINN MUTUAL LIFE
MINN MUTUAL LIFE
MINN MUTUAL LIFE
MINN MUTUAL LIFE
ITEM DESCRIPTION
JAN SVC
JANSVC
JAN SVC
JAN SAC CHGS
FEB INSTALL
FEB PREM
FEB PREM
FEB PREM
FEB PREM
SPL YS
GLOVES/MITTS
FEB
W/H-
FEB
,W/H
FE B'
PREM
FEB
PREM
FE'B
PREM
FEB
PREM
FEB
PREF
23.25
NELSON RADIOCOMM
JAY
MTCN
62.40
NELSON RADIOCOMM,
CO
SIREN JAN MTCN
'B5.-65
-
l.P".'
e 3.94:" :'...... `'.: :4.iiT_H —N? ST` P°- WfR'-Cff--,--
JAN
SVC`
203.04
NORTHERN..ST P0WER,_C0'
_. JAN
SVC
203.04
"' NO.R.THERN" ST PCG ER CO
JAN
SVC'
125.05
NORTHERN ST POWER CO
JAN
SVC
155.15
NORTHERN ST POWER CO
JAN
SVC
135.37
NORTHERN ST POWER CO
JAN
SVC
1.245.69
NORTHERN ST POWER CO
JANSVC
ACCOUNT N0. INV
01-4335-310— 50
01-4335-31 0— 70
15-4335-310-60
15-4448-060-60
15-4449-060-60
01-2074-000-00
01-4245-021-20
01-4245-050-5C
01-4245-070-70
01-4305.-030-10
01-4305-03C
z
01-20?i =OGD=OD'��
'01-2074-000-00
01-4245-020.=20_;
01-4245-021-20
01-4245-070-70
01-4245-110-10
05-4245-105-1 5
01-4330-450-20
07-4330-000-00_.,,;
0'1'— 4,;2' t' 3ff'D �°
01-4211=-31.0-50
01-4 211--310— 70
01-4211-315 1
01-4211-32(0
01-4211-420-50
01-4212-310-5-0
AMOUNT
1.245.70
1 9439 .72
235.58
203.04
248.;11
1.245.69
69969.02 *�
226.°5
66.16
157. 60
315.03
70.99
79.93
358.91
1 r 2 75,47 +v
115.00
80.00
195.00 *�
11 .25
3.75
.. 5 .G0 *�
CHECK R GIS TER
VE N 0 0 R
NORTHERN
ST
POWER
CO
� ORTHERN
ST
POWER
CO
NORTHERN
ST
POWER
CO
NORTHERN
ST
POWER
CO
NORTHERN
ST
POWER
CO
NORTHERN
ST
POWER
CO
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWEST,RN BELL
CAK CREST KENNELS
OAK CREST KENNELS
OXYGEN SER VICE CO
OXYGEN SErRVICE CO
ITEM DESCRIPTION
JAN SVC
JAN SVC
JAN SVC
JAN SVC
JANSVC
JAN SVC
JAN SVC
JAN SVC
JAN SVC
JAN SVC
JAN SVC
JAN SVC
JAN SVC
RETAINER /CALLS
BOARD
DEMURRAGE
DEMURRAGE
., r
23 .'?'O
PAYLESS
C4SHWAYS
IWC
LOCKS/DOOR SET t
115.90
PAYLESS
CASHWAYS
INC
DOOR SET
23.70—
PAYLESS
CASHWAYS
INC
CORRPROG_
7.90.
PAYLESS
CASHWAYS
INC
LOCKS e
"
2 3 .7 0 *�
PROD ,. •
STYRO : GUPS
01—,4.490,1J,
4.58-
ACCOUNT N0. IN'
01-4212-310-70
01-4212-315-30
01-4212-320-70
15-4211-310-60
15-4211-400-60
15-4212-310-60
01-4210-020-20
01-4210-050-50
01-4210-070-70
01-4210-110-10
01-4210-315- 30
05-4210-105-15
15-4210-060-60
01-4221-800-90
01-4225-800-90
01-4305-030-30'�
01-4305 -050-510
01-4305-070— 70
01-4305-490-70
01-4305-490-70`
01-4305-490-76
3.00
S&T
OFFICE
PROD
DISKETTE MAILER
01-4300-110-10
4.44
S&T
OFFICE
PROD
PLANNERCAL
01-4300-110-10_
4.59
S & T.
OFFICE
PROD
STYRO CUPS
01-4,4911.-020-20
- _ .4.59
,,, :..' . ..,..:5&.T
OF.FICE..
PROD ,. •
STYRO : GUPS
01—,4.490,1J,
4.58-
S&Ti
OFFICE
PR00
STYR'O CUPS
t.
05-4490-10`5='15
21 .?0
- •.w.:.
—_s _ '.r. vii#ai'+i 77:c�
...r. ,x,-.� Lam'
•. �:rr....
�<w•'.'s+i'cer:.:C:e %'i
..35.00
�SctAF1DER
DUANE C
FEB MILEAGE
01-4415=2Q0-70
35 .00
+�
2,512.50 SHAUGHNESSY L E JR JAN SVC 01-4220-132-10
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUK.T -VEND CR ITEM DESCRIPTION
33.00 SHAUGHNESSY L E JR CONF MILEAGE
2.545.50 *�
34.50 SHIELDS GAS&ELECTRIC SVC CALL
94.00 SHIELDS GAS&ELECTRIC RPRS BCILER
128.50 *�
19.33 SNYDER DRjG STORES FILM
19.33
77.64 SOUTHVIEW CHEVROLET FUEL GUAGE RPRS
77..64 *--
200.00
ST PAUL
EMPL ASSN
84
DUES
66.67
ST,_ PAUL
AS_SN__
84
DUES
66.67
.,,c;SrT-i%PAUL..E44-P-:.-ASSN
_EMP,,
84•
DUES'
66.66
'ST PAUL'
EMOV ASSN
84
.OUES
400.00 *�
'
a
�.
10.62 '
10.62 +�
7.110
57.05
64.85 *i
ACCOUNT N0. INV
01-4415-110 -1
01-4335-315-30
01-4335-315-3 0
01-4305-020-20
01-43.0-440-20
01-44014-020-20
01-4404-050-50
01-4404-070-70
15-4404-060-60
SW, ,NEWS'P'AP£RS"` :'-' ..;; z , `= . I.D ;, ... 16-4240-850
.y .<'ra _ _—'`'.•_'.. SYic."^^r3c??fii.�tsS71i.«�,::;4" - _.-.�,F'w ..ia.^.
9 ... ,., », ..-... -..�a. .. ... ra. ,,;::•,'µ..;ms,........ .. .. .. ,
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED MISC 01-4410-020-20 1
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED CLOTHING' KLEIBER 07-4410-000-00 1
135.00 UNITED NAY—ST PAUL FEB CONTR
1 35.00 *i
a
01-2070-000-00
127.10 WESTERN LIFE INS CO F:B PREM
127.10 *i
01-4246-030•
,, .;�..t:i�y`-:s� . t y�;t ,S -._r. u^ •3_ �+�"s�e_'1i-::
1 :.66
'WELS� FA RG7
TRUSTEE -c8 li%W �fl`J' JAN
01-2`071—b}00=00
46.00
WEDS FARGO
TRUSTEE FEB PREM - -- _
01-4246-020-20
24.16
4��L'l..S..,F.AA.G�J
T.Ru:STE.E-' ;- S :P G.N} ,_.;_.:.,.,,� ..
_ — 0-
01424,6-0:77Q�,'
~1 41 .8 2
;.�-�,
127.10 WESTERN LIFE INS CO F:B PREM
127.10 *i
01-4246-030•
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT VE: NO OR
-39202,06
WINTHROPWEINSTINE&S
2 50 .40
WI NTHR OPW E I NS TI NE &S
269.40
WINTHROPWEINSTINE&S
19000.00
WINTHROPWEINSTINE&S
19500.00
WINTHROPWEINSTINE&S
122.97
WINTHROPWEINSTINE&S
995.60
WINTHROPNEINSTINE&S
19299049
WINTHROPWEINSTINE&S
89639.92 *✓
FUND
409462.71
FUND
01
TOTAL
1 9465 .31_
FUND
05
TOTAL
299227.05
FUND
06
TOTAL
154.45
FUND
07
TOTAL
29,p7F6,55
FUND
15
TOTAL
3,511.94
FUND
16
TOTAL
19905.06
FUND
23
TOTAL
5,04
FUND
26
TOTAL
12 9095.31
FUND
74
TOTAL
4.62
FUND
87
TOTAL
1189618.94 TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO, IN
4TH
OTR83 PROS
01-2010-000-00
RE
WAHL KRAJNIAK
01-2010-000-00
RE
DEF COMP
01-2010-000-010
RE
FIREMANS ASSN
01-2010-000-00
4TH
OTR83RETATNER
01-2010-000-010
REFIREMENS
ASSN
01-2010-000-00
RE
FS CONST
16-4220-850-00
RE
IVY FALLS
74-4287-936-00
GENERAL FUND
ENGR ENTERPRISE
FIRE RELIEF
CIVIL DEFENSE
SEWER UTILITY
TID I79-7181-4/82-2/82-6
CABLE TV FRANCHISE
CONS PROD FUND
CONS PROJ FUND
183-4 GR YC P ROJ
MANUAL CHECKS'.
:t j
•10432-- 64', 54_3.75 '=19t= Trust" St --'Paul Interst GO Bonds
y L=385`'6. CA /6 PR
-10433J:}': 2, 4r ]sS_Tr'eas:>;'a G ;FI 1
. -- •34-.62 ,a,.' a :.:,,••., .: 1/20 PR
X10434' -2""4 _'�.c_� .�:•� s:•-fir;•-�:,,:. .. .-'+`..
PR' Deductions
1:0435
x -X300::00. 1/2 P
�R.
10436 _ 250..00 �Di Ward ' In,lieu of PR. Deduction _
164.37. 620.15 �:S :Ca, Cr i7n `"" = R Dedu t' '
_ - _?� - �.; .., R' a ions. � 1/20.
10438 xp" ..
4,776.01 Dir Int Rev FIT W/H 1/20 PR
y
10439 5,457.56 Comm REvenueY- . SIT W/H 1/6&1/20 PR
10440 22,654.68 City MH PR Acct Net Payroll 1/20
103,422.38
GT 222,041.32
,P. 1,. - �. }s ...Ns:�is.i:' St.v: s-`.•tas- x� - - . � � ,r •
��.�.�A.r e_y�:'s x �_. w♦ _� � k•: �'.. .. - � ._Y •- � _ '- - _-2
-V wsm _ - _� __-- - - - - - '.C'-re._�:ra,wr.vr:�-!Y•. a•_~=--ir��e4:....�'i _
•a��-�.i:x::�i�. rt::, �4y • _ i� - _ -».Xr
N: sy�$:: w:.�. ,� _ - pew=�=-�- - - - - --- - - - - - '"'�--::c;•�^..-�'�_.. .'. �., t ':�:.r .€':...y.,.:�� _ ..='�?7:�`'.'`�.t:-`�Yr.� �r�r�^ . _
7A- r ,tea e•- o.TM -. ._ - ,- - _ •. .. .-,.
TJ. n` .`J.-%'! ��^' •,-•e�-Ne:U= .R {_i..�.:`.:=ti.:.:i.r'. _ ?S'r :.�s iiS-i:dJ.:>4 eC - -i
.+t:.:.,., "i^-�'•" -,t�:iL�'�s`ss°.-`6:c $x7fsl�.`-1 � -v,.. �nw. x-x��'{�s�"e:: �" .^i,•... �-„ .. _.. �•k' -•. :�,,;:��.: :..' .moi --a _,�r�t�':�' Nr, y_fS-_:_•-:t P� .. �..
� _".".
F�f
. .-.: ......-. - .....,.:......._=....-.�....� _ - _ ..�. �-- � -__.nom..=......_..-
Page No. 1948
January 17, 1984
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, January 17, 1984
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council,
City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at the City Hall, 750 South
Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following
members were present: Mayor Lockwood, Councilmembers Hartmann, Mertensotto and
Witt. Councilman Losleben notified that Council that he would be out of town.
APPROVAL OF Mayor Lockwood moved approval of the minutes of the January 3,
MINUTES meeting.
Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
CONSENT Councilman Hartmann moved approval of the consent calendar as
CALENDAR submitted and recommended for approval as part of the regular
agenda, along with authorization for execution of all necessary.
documents contained therein.
1. Acknowledgement of the minutes of the December 14, 1983,
NDC4 meeting.
2. Acknowledgement of the engineering status report, Fire depart-
ment report, and treasurer's monthly report for December.
3. Approval of the List of Claims dated January 17, 1984, and
totalling $618,856.69.
4. Approval of the List of contractors licenses, granting licenses
to the following:
Arcade Concrete Construction
Masonry License
Boehm Heating Co.
Heating & A/C
Centraire, Inc.
Heating & A/C
Centraire, Inc.
Gas Piping
Central Air Condt. & Heating Co.
Heating & A/C
Central Air.Cond-t: & Heating Co.
Gas Piping
Richard T. Cousins
Masonry
Dodd Construction
General Contractor
Fredrickson Heating & A/C
Heating & A/C
Fredrickson Heating & A/C
Gas Piping
Genz -Ryan Plumbing & Heating
Gas Piping
Horwitz, Inc.
Heating & A/C
Housley Construction, Inc.
Plastering/Stucco
Imperial Developers
Excavating
Krumwiede Construction
Excavating
John Larson Roofing & Sheet Metal
General Contractor
Mrozik Construction, Inc.
General Contractor
Wm. Murr Plumbing, Inc.
Excavating
Ryan Plumbing
Excavating
Page No. 1949 -
January 17, 1984
Schomaker Construction
General Contractoi
Geo. Sedgwick Heating
Heating & A/C
Geo. Sedgwick Heating
Gas Piping
The Snelling Company
Gas Piping
The Snelling Company
Heating & A/C
Suburban Cement Construction
Masonry
Sussel Corporation
General Contractor
Theissen-Nonnemacher
General Contractor
United Water & Sewer Co.
Excavating
Valley Investments
General Contractor
Ray N. Welter Heating Co.
Heating & A/C
Ray N. Welter Heating Co.
Gas Piping
Scott Zimmerman
General Contractor
5. Approval of the issuance of 1984 cigarette sales licenses to
Getty Self Service Station and Somerset Country Club.
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
HEARING -- CASE NO. Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpose of a public
83-02, CULLIGAN hearing on an application for subdivision and critical area site
SUBDIVISION plan approval for the proposed Valley View Oak 2nd Addition.
The Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works Director Daniel-
son recommending that the public hearing be continued to March
6th, pending resolution of issues relating to a Joint Powers
Agreement with the City of Mendota. It was noted that the
developer is in concurrence with the hearing continuation and
was not in attendance at the meeting.
There being no public comments, Councilman Mertensotto moved
that the hearing be continued to 7:30 P.M. on March 6, 1984.
Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
FIRE STATION Architects Jim Jordan and Bruce Caulfield from Trossen-Wright,
were present to review plans for the proposed fire station and
request authorization to advertise for bids. Mr. Jordan reviewed
the project development schedule for the Council. He also reviewed
the several add -alternate provisions in the specifications and
bid document. He indicated that the plans call for a 76 foot by
80 foot bay and shelled office and activity areas. The add -alter -
,nates would allow construction of the bay area to 99 feet in 418"
increments, finishing of the public areas, and finishing of the
activity areas.- Mr. Caulfield described the building design and
site plan for the Council.
Councilman Mertensotto asked that the bid documents include the
right of the City to reject any and all bids, particularly in t
instance where a contractor does not bid on all alternates. HE
also expressed concern that the lighting be adequate.
After discussion, Councilman Mertensotto moved approval of the
plans and specifications for the new fire station and authorization
--I- . ___
January 17, 1984
to advertise for bids, subject to approval of plans and spec-
ifications by the Fire Marshal and Code Enforcement Officer.
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
COMMUNICATIONS The Council acknowledged a letter from the United States Postal
Service indicating the Service is considering moving its Postal
Data Center from Fort Snelling and that the City is included
in the,preferred area for siting of the facility. The matter
was referred to staff.
COMMISSION The Council acknowledged a letter from Sandy Butler in resig-
RESIGNATION nation from her position on the Planning Commission.
Councilman Mertensotto moved the adoption of Resolution No. 84-
04, "RESOLUTION COMMENDING SANDRA BUTLER FOR CITY SERVICE",
expressing the Council's regret for her resignation and appreciation
for her service.
Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
RACE TRACK The Council acknowledged a letter from Mr. Bernard Friel and a
letter and draft resolution from the Friendly Hills Civic
Association requesting that the Council oppose the proposed siting
of a race track facility in the northern portion of the City of
Eagan. The Council also acknowledged a letter from Councilman
Losleben relative to the race track issue. Numerous residents
of the Friendly Hills and Delaware Crossing areas were present
for the discussion.
Mr. Friel was present to represent both himself and the Friendly
Hills Civic Association. He reviewed the project EAW prepared
by the City of Eagan, and described the location and proposed uses
for the 494 acre site, and the hours of operation of the proposed
race track facility. Mr. Friel explained that the neighbors have
four principal concerns: the potential for pressures on the
City Council to rezone the property adjacent to Friendly Hills and
Delaware Crossing from residential to commercial or light Industria
if the track facility is constructed; the noise from the race track
public address system and crowd noise; traffic -increases which
will be generated because of the facility; and increase in aircraft
noise from potential re-routing of air traffic to accommodate
race activities. He stated that the Metropolitan Airports
Commission staff has also expressed concern over the potential
pressures to divert aircraft away from the racetrack site if the
facility is constructed. He stated that he is deeply concerned
over the impact such a facility would have on his own property and
urged the Council to take formal action to oppose the proposed
location -of the race track facility and urge Eagan in conducting
an Environmental Impact Statement to address the impact such a
facility would have on Mendota Heights.
Mr. Carl Cummins, 2312 Nashua Lane, supported Mr. Friel's remarks
and submitted and read a proposed resolution he had prepared for
Page No. 1951
January 17, 1984
Council consideration. He stated that the project EAW which w
become the basis for the EIS for the project does not address
impacts on Mendota Heights. He expressed his opinion that the
Eagan site is in strong contention and would have a negative
impact on the Mendota Heights residential areas. He asked that
the Council consider his resolution and take action to request
the City of Eagan to address impacts on Mendota Heights within
the EIS.
Mr. and Mrs. Augustus Hipp, Ms. Edie Lancaster, Mr. Richard
Gabriel, Mr. Ultan Duggan, Mr. Richard Zahn, and Mrs. John Sukalo,
expressed their concerns and opposition to the proposed facility,
asked that the Council formally oppose the site and asked that
the impacts on Mendota Heights be studied in the EIS.
Mayor Lockwood reviewed the role of the Metropolitan Council in
the siting process and informed the Council and audience that
he had discussed the matter with the Metropolitan Council District
Representative, Carol Sindt. She informed him that the report of
the Metropolitan Council committee which studied the siting process
included a major amendment which states that the racing commission
and all potential site developers be advised that the report does
not commit the Metropolitan Council at this time to any system
improvement or modifications and that the selection of the site
should not be premised on the assumption that the Metropolitan
Airports Commission or Metropolitan Council will make fundamental
changes in plans, such as air traffic lanes, so as to place bu
on properties not presently so burdened. Mayor Lockwood stated
that he has asked the City Planner to contact the Eagan planners
to make certain that the concerns of the City of Mendota Heights,
many of which have been addressed by the residential property
owners present this evening, are going to be addressed in the
EIS. He informed the audience of recent conversations with Eagan
Mayor Bea Blomquist, and stated that the Eagan City Council has
indicated that it would be happy to make available to Mendota
Heights and its residents the Eagan consultants and developers
involved in the race track proposal. He stated that the parties
involved would be willing to make a presentation to the Mendota
Heights residents and City Council during the time the EIS is
being prepared. He pointed out that when the Mendota Heights
City Council first heard about the Eagan proposal approximately
three months ago, the Council requested that they be kept informed
by the City of Eagan and notified Eagan representatives that
Mendota Heights City Council is concerned about the process.
Councilwoman Witt informed the audience that there will be a
public hearing on the draft EIS and a public comment period
after the EIS is completed. She also suggested that the Council
and residents accept the offer of the Eagan officials to make
presentations so that more information could be available to
Mendota Heights residents. At the time of the presentations, the
concerns of the residents and City Council could be expressed
the Eagan City officials.
Councilman Mertensotto informed the audience that the City of
Mendota Heights and the City of Eagan are involved in many
Page No. 1952
`January 17, 1984
cooperative agreements and that, because of the cooperation
which has existed between the two communities, he did not
believe that formal opposition to the project would be
appropriate at this time. He felt that the Mendota Heights City
Council should advise the Eagan City Council of the several areas
of concern stated by the residents and the City Council, which
include noise, diversification of aircraft, traffic increases,
and other issues.
After considerable discussion, Councilman Mertensotto moved to
direct staff to prepare a letter for Mayor Lockwood's signature
to be directed to the Mayor and City Council of the City of
Eagan, advising the Eagan city officials: that numerous Mendota
Heights residents appeared before the City Council this evening
requesting that the Council take an official stance opposing the
race track; that the City Council declined to do so but that the
Council, by submission of the letter, formally advises the City
of Eagan that there are many areas of concern to the residents
of Mendota Heights, including potential rezoning pressures,
noise, public safety problems, potential increased crime factors,
diversion of air traffic and additional air noise, potential
traffic increases; and expressing the Mendota Heights City
Council's main concern is that the EIS to be prepared on behalf
of the developers address these problems as they relate to Mendota
Heights; copies of the communication to be submitted to the
Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Dakota
County Board of Commissioners, the Minnesota Racing Commission, and
the Friendly Hills Civic Association.
Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
RECESS Mayor Lockwood called for a recess at 9:35 o'clock P.M. The
meeting reconvened at 9:50 o'clock P.M.
NDC -4 The Council acknowledged a letter and copy of the proposed
budget for the Northern Dakota County Cable Communications
Commission. The Commission, in its letter, requested Council
approval of the City's 1984 NDC -4 member city contribution
assessment in the amount of $1,900.
Councilwoman Witt moved to approve the disbursement of $1,900
for the 1984 contribution to the Northern Dakota County Cable
Communications Commission.
( Councilman Mertensotto,seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
COMMISSION Mayor Lockwood moved that James Stein and Robert Doffing and
APPOINTMENTS Mary Jeanne Schneeman be reappointed to three year terms on the
Park and Recreation Commission.
Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Mayor Lockwood moved to reappoint John Frank and Janet Blesener
to three year terms on the Planning Commission.
Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
Page No. 1953
January 17, 1984
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
SNOWMOBILE The Council acknowledged and briefly discussed a memo from
REGULATIONS Police Chief Delmont regarding snowmobile laws.
MISCELLANEOUS The Council acknowledged a memo from Police Chief Delmont
regarding fire wood sales at 1472 Sibley Memorial Highway and
recommending return of an escrow submitted by Mr. George McNeill
in September, to guarantee compliance with the City's requirement
to cease firewood storage and sales at the subject property.
On the recommendation of Police Chief Delmont, Councilman
Mertensotto moved to return the $250 escrow submitted by Mr.
George McNeill.
Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
CAPITAL PURCHASES The Council acknowledged a memo from Fire Chief Noack requesting
permission to update the Squrt unit for an approximate cost of
$4,100, along with acquisition of bunker pants and air pacs.
The Council briefly discussed the need for 31 pair of bunker
pants and asked questions of several fire department members
present for the discussion, including describing the improvements
to the Squrt.
After a brief discussion, Councilman Mertensotto moved to include
the update of the Squrt unit in the Equipment Certificate budget,
along with approval of the acquisition of the bunker pants as
requested.
Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
SQUAD CARS
The Council acknowledged a memo from Police Chief Delmont
regarding acquisition of squad cars for 1984. In his memo, Chief
Delmont advised the Council that the low bid received through
the bidding process for Ramsey County, Washington County and
Hennepin County, the State of Minnesota, St. Paul and Minneapolis,
was submitted by White Bear Dodge for Dodge Diplomats. He
recommended that the Council award the bid for three 1984
squad cars to White Bear Dodge.
{
Mayor Lockwood moved to approve purchase of three 1984 Dodge
Diplomats from White Bear Dodge for $9,980 per vehicle, as
recommended by Chief Delmont.
Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
TREASURER
The Council acknowledged a memo from City Administrator Johnsor
COMPENSATION
recommending an increase in the hourly rate for the City's
Treasurer/Financial Advisor.
Councilman Mertensotto moved that the compensation for Treasurer/
Financial Advisor Shaughnessy be increased to $30.00 per hour
Page No. 1954
January 17, 1984
for 1984.
Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
PERSONNEL The Council acknowledged a proposed resolution to amend the
provisions for the transition of City Administration from
Orvil Johnson to Kevin Frazell, wherein Administrator Johnson
would formally retire from the position on February 3rd, and
continue with the City as a part-time Special Projects Assistant
through July 6th.
Mayor Lockwood moved the adoption of Resolution No. 84-05,
"A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PROVISIONS FOR THE TRANSITION IN THE
POSITION OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM ORVIL J. JOHNSON TO KEVIN
D. FRAZELL".
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
JOINT MEETING The Council acknowledged a memo from City Administrator Designee
Frazell recommending that the Council conduct a joint meeting
with the Park and Recreation Commission on January 24.
Commission member Bob Doffing was present and reviewed Park
Commission activities with the Council, requesting that the
Council approve the joint meeting to discuss development of a
bike trail system within the City.
Councilman Mertensotto moved that this evening's meeting be
convened on January 24th, at 7:30 P.M., as an adjourned meeting
for the purpose of meeting with the Park and Recreation
Commission to discuss trails and for discussion of any other
matters which may come before the City Council.
Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
FIRE DEPARTMENT Administrator Designee Frazell briefly reviewed his memo on Fire
Department matters, along with a proposed time table for
accomplishing the selection of new department officers and
revision of organizational documents. Mr. Frazell indicated that
he would attend the January 18th Fire Department meeting to
discuss department operations with the members, and informed
the Council that he would submit fire department job descriptions
to the City Council for review on February 7th.
COUNCIL WORKSHOP The Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from Administrator
Designee Frazell recommending that the Council conduct a goals
and objective workshop on January 31st. It was the concensus
of the members of the Council that the workshop should be
conducted on January 31st at 7:00 P.M.
AIRPORT LAND Councilman Mertensotto reviewed a memo prepared by him and -
Financial Advisor Shaughnessy relative to the Airport Joint
Zoning Board proposed ordinance amendment to apply the density
transfer concept to B zones within the City.
Page No. 1955
January 17, 1984
DEFERRED On the recommendation of,Assistant City Attorney Tom Hart,
COMPENSATION Councilwoman Witt moved adoption of Resolution No. 84-06,
"RESOLUTION APPOINTING COMMITTEE UNDER DEFERRED COMPENSATION
PLAN", appointing Mayor Robert Lockwood, City Administrator
Designee Kevin Frazell, and Treasurer Larry Shaughnessy to the
committee.
Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
LILYDALE POLICE Assistant City Attorney Hart reviewed the proposed Police
AGREEMENT Service Agreement with the City of Lilydale, and informed the
Council that the document has been executed by Lilydale officials.
Councilwoman Witt moved adoption of Resolution No. 84-07, "RESOL-
UTION APPROVING LILYDALE POLICE SERVICE AGREEMENT", authorizing
its execution by the appropriate City officials.
Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
FIRE STATION Assistant City Attorney Hart informed the Council on the status
SITE of the Warnke license and purchase agreement. There was con-
siderable discussion over insurance for the residential structure
and rights of transfer, among other things.
MISCELLANEOUS City Administrator Designee Frazell informed the Council that
Metropolitan Council Representative Carol Sindt has agreed to
be present for a forthcoming Council meeting to become acquainted
with the Council. He also informed the Council that he has
been advised by United Properties representatives that U.S.
West will be an occupant of Phase I of the Mendota Heights
Business Center.
ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council,
Councilman Hartmann moved that the meeting be adjourned to
7:30 o'clock P.M. on January 24.
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:15 o'clock P.M.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Robert G. Lockwood
Mayor
Page No. 1956
January 24, 1984
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Adjourned Joint
Meeting with the Park and Recreation
Commission and City Council
Held Tuesday, January 24, 1984
C Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the adjourned meeting of the City
Council and Park and Recreation Commission, City of Mendota Heights, was held
at 7:30 o'clock"P.M., at the City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights,
Minnesota.
Acting Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:33 P.M. The following
members were present: Acting Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Hartmann and Witt.
Park and Recreation Commission members present were: Chairperson Jim Stein,
Commissioners Al Singer, Marsha Knittig, and Bob Doffing. Mayor Lockwood and
Councilman Losleben were absent.
Item #1 - Roll Call. The roll was noted by acting City Clerk Kevin Frazell.
Item #2 - Adopt the Agenda. The agenda was adopted by concensus.
Item #3 - Introductory Remarks by Jim Stein, Parks Commission Chairperson, regarding
development of bike trail system.
Stein said that at Council request, the Parks Commission had taken a
look at the trails plan. He said that while trails are normally thought
of as a recreational amenity, there are also safety considerations in
getting bikers and joggers off the streets. According to Stein, Mendota
Heights is at a bike trail "hub", with the links to the Eagan and
Minneapolis systems. Consequently, Stein said that he thought the City's
proposal for development of the system was consistent with the County's
plans.
Commissioner Bob Doffing said that it was the Commission's plan to start
with a "backbone" system that went somewhere, by linking the Ramsey
County Regional Park to the Eagan system and the trail across I-494, into
the Minneapolis system. Other links of the Mendota Heights system could
then be developed at later dates.
Commissioner Stein noted that the link being proposed by the Commission
through Valley Park is important because it gets people off TH 13.
Item #4 - Staff presentation -and proposal - Director of -Public. -Works Jim Danielson.
Mr. Danielson said that the proposal was to develop a "trunk" trail system,
just as we have trunk water and sewer systems showing the proposed align-
ment of the trunk or backbone system.
He indicated that he and City Administrator Frazell had met with repre-
sentatives of the County Parks and Planning Departments, and that they
actually prefer the City's proposal to the existing County plans.
Mr. Danielson said that the proposal was to develop the backbone system over
a three year period, with the first link being completed in 1984. This
Page No. 1957
January 24, 1984
would be completion of the Marie Avenue alignment east of Valley Park,
then north through Valley Park to the Mendota Heights City limits. He
said that the estimated cost of this 1.2 mile segment would be approx-
imately $50,000, and that the City would be applying through the Minnesota
Department of Transportation grant program for 757 of the construction cost.
County staff had indicated that there might likely be residual funds left
from previous trails projects in the County to fund the $12,500 local.
match for the project. He said that in all of these projects, the local
( community was required to provide the engineering design and inspection
services, which would be approximately $15,000.
City Administrator Frazell stated that the request of the Commission and
the staff was to have Council authorization to pursue funding through
Mn/DOT and the County, and also to spend up to $15,000 from the local
park improvement fund for engineering services. However, he said that Mn/
DOT did not currently have an appropriation, and was trying to substantiate
the need for an appropriation beginning with July 1, 1984. He said that
the County also did not necessarily have funds, but that the staff of the
County Parks department were confident that there would be some funds
available when they close out existing projects.
Item #5 - Council/Commission Discussion of Park Development Priorities.
Chairperson Stein indicated that the Commission had discussed the relative
importance of trails versus saving money for the acquisition of additional
park facilities, most notably the Wachtler property. Stein said that the
Commission had a very definite priority on beginning development of the
trail system, but that it would also be important to acquire the Wachtler
property when and if it becomes available.
City Administrator Orvil Johnson said that no one had ever answered the
question as to how much of the Wachtler site we really needed for develop-
ment of a community park. He suggested that it might be wise to spend
some money to study the Wachtler site so that we could determine what our
exact needs and wants are. Councilman Mertensotto expressed the concern
that if the property were sold to a developer, he would probably be able to
demand a much higher price based on the highest and best use of the property.
There was a general concensus of the Commission and Council that staff
should research possibilities for developing a more complete needs
assessment and proposal for a park on the Wachtler site.
Item #6 - Council Action Regarding Proposed Trail System.
l Motion by Councilmember Witt, seconded by Councilmember Hartmann to approve
the concept of the trails "backbone" system as shown on the map.
Motion passed unanimously.
y Motion by Councilman Hartmann, seconded by Councilwoman Witt to authorize
staff to proceed with developing and submitting a grant application to the
Minnesota Department of Transportation, based upon -the three year staged
implementation plan.
Motion passed unanimously.
Page No. 1958
January 24, 1984
Motion by Councilwoman Witt, seconded by Councilman Hartmann to authorize
the expenditure of up to $3,000 from the Parks improvement fund for the
engineering department to do a feasibility study of the Lexington segment
of the proposed backbone system.
Motion passed unanimously.
C Motion by Councilman Hartmann, seconded by Councilwoman Witt to adopt
..Resolution No. 84-08, "RESOLUTION REQUESTING DAKOTA COUNTY ENDORSEMENT
.OF AND COST PARTICIPATION IN A CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TRAIL SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENT", requesting the Dakota County Board of Commissioners to
endorse the Mendota Heights backbone trail system, and provide up to
$12,500 for the 257 local match required under the Mn/DOT program.
Motion passed unanimously.
The adjourned meeting.of the City Council was adjourned to January 31,
1984,. at 7:00 o'clock P.M., in the Engineering Conference Room.
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:05 o'clock P.M.
Recorded and transcribed by Kevin D. Frazell, City Administrator
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
Charles E.'Mertensotto
Acting Mayor
Eal
Page No. I9`i9
January 31, 1984
C1'I'Y OF MENDOTA 11EI(;11TS
DAKO'T'A COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Adjourned Meeting
Held Tuesday, January 31, 1984
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the adjourned meeting of the City
Council, City of Mendota Heights, was -held at 7:00 o'clock P.M. at City Ilal.l.,
750 South.Plaza�-Drive,. Mendota Tleights, Minnesota
zYs/��'��'�.'�r��tr,�`'�='�:`� c�s*�'s',x•'�.. a«: -;,: _•�a,. ' �,:;�:>: > ' � A_'a.; .`..�� ?�_
`y',,,o.ry..w.�.e....�.'L•�.te�`^a:',T,'-i `.: _"4r ra.F;C ',`�:-�.._ -r:.. :_.._�..-v.,..' .. _. �v .'_ a, z,.>dr>..r,`.--"•' '<-, -
t ""`�� �•'�^;� Acting'' Mayo r-Kertenso•tto' called the meeting to order at 7:Wo'clock P.M.
,,,��,•.., rhe following members were present; Acting, Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembcrs
Losleben and Witt. Staff members present were City Administrator .Johnson,
City Administrator Frazell, Public Works Director Danielson, Police Chief
Delmont, and City Clerk Swanson. Mayor Lockwood and Councilman Hartmann had
notified the Council that they would be late.
ADOPTION OF Councilman Losleben moved adoption of the agenda for the
AGENDA evening.
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
:t ,T ��, `"i:.:! ^ n� J•i '.F� j� .'-..1. j ••., .1 �: 3 •: �.: rM1w}:TrA' R.0. ... ...n • - - .. - ^ . a ' i n ' - . ,, -
14 0
ITY-'PINANC.IAL " City Treasurer Sh�me'ss�y and Administrator Frazell reviewed -
STATUS",'- - , their joist memo on the City's financiali,'status. As part
*; of the discussion, Treasurer Shaughnessy asked for Council
'direction regarding the issuance of tax ,anticipation certificates.
He was directed to pursue the matter, obtaining offers for the
purchase of the certificates, and return with a recommendation
at a future Council meeting.
There was brief discussion over the Special Park Fund balance, the
Federal Revenue Sharing program extension, and the potential
tax forfeiture of several parcels of property.
TAX COMPARISONS City Administrator Johnson reviewed his memo on real estate tax
information and comparisons, and a graph comparing net real
estate taxes for Mendota Heights and communities located in
Ramsey and Hennepin Counties.
Mayor Lockwood and Coucilman Hartmann arrived at 7:31 P.M.
The Council briefly discussed the tax comparisons and the
statistics as presented.
1984 TARGET ISSUES City Administrator Frazell reviewed his memo on proposed
1984 target issues and the process used by staff to derive and
prioritize the list of 21 potential issues to be dealt with in
1984 and 1985. He briefly described each of the issues, request-
ing that Council review the prioritization, and confirm, add to
or change the issues and their priority rankings. As part of the
discussion, the Council determined that park acquisition and
development, street lighting, and the City Newsletter should be
raised to top priority. There was also discussion on development
of a mechanism for better community information dissemination and
community group input/ involvement as a priority.
Page No. 1960
January 31, 1984
COUNCIL MEETING
Administrator Frazell reviewed his memo on potential changes
CHANGES
for Council meetings, suggesting possible changes in agenda
_
structuring, the initiation of add-on agendas for issues raised
in the interim between agenda preparation and Council meeting
dates, the processing of responses to issues raised•by members
_
f th c an Council at Counci ati
o e public and -the 1 me:engs;,emin On
s _
i t w'C jj .w _ o • w . ...s •. n n. ��. ] F
-of. 'ora t-staft�reportst at Council meet.ings,:=and�t�Ti�us of_ a_-.
" reports
consistent format for staff
The Council concurred in the recommendations, in particular adopt -4
'
ion of an agenda at the beginning of each meeting, and directed
staff to prepare an amendment to the Council procedures Ordinance
to delete the agenda format.
ADJOURN
There being no further business to come before the Council,:
Councilman Hartmann moved that the meeting be adjourned..
Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0'
14
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:54 o'clock R.M. `,?r A; : r' ,-: -' s.: ;. �•;
•.� °
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
Y'
ATTEST:
Robert G. Lockwood
Mayor
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 31, 1984
TO: City Ad;ZArator, Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson.
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Renewal of Home Beauty Shop License
Mrs. Elizabeth.Mulchhy, 6.70 - 2nd Avenue, stopped in today to
request approval to operate her home beauty salon.for anothTer year.
She has been.coming in of her own accord, without any reminder or•
proppting by staff, since -January, 1979. We have received no complaints
about her home occupation and she operates only two days a week, Tuesday
and Friday, from 8:00 to 5:00 P.M.
Recommendation and Action Required:
I recommend that Council approvelthe home beauty shop "permit"
for 1984. If Council concurs, it should be approved as part of the
February 7th Consent Calendar.
0
MEMO
January 31, 1984
TO: , Ma orCit Council, and City Admin' tra' Vi
Mayor, y
FROM: Dennis J. Delmont�� f
Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Neighborhood Crime Watch
Introduction
We are presently in the process of organizing a "Neighborhood Crime Watch"
program that includes the streets of London, Downing and Brompton.
History
It is widely held that a proactive rather than a reactive stance on crime is
the most effective and least painful method of dealing with the problem.
Because of our limited manpower, it is impossible for us to canvas neighbor-
hoods and attempt to "force-feed" crime prevention. Newspaper articles
offering different services to the City have not been effective. A recent
outbreak of property crimes resulted in a neighborhood coming to us for help.
I spoke to approximately 50 Ivy Falls homeowners at Somerset School in
December, 1983. The talk included crime prevention tips and information
about Crime Watch.
On January 11, 1984 at approximately 2:00 a.m., a citizen who had attended
the meeting heard a suspicious noise outside and upon investigation, saw a
young man walking through the neighborhood. As recommended, the police were
called and followed the man's tracks. The result was an arrest for burglary.
The young man had burglarized 5 garages in the neighborhood and the neighbor's
quick action was responsible for his capture. This neighborhood has now formed
together to become Mendota Heights' first Crime Watch neighborhood.
Discussion
In the near future you will see indications of this new program. Newspaper
articles will make others aware of it, and through the cooperation of Public
Works, signs that were purchased by the citizens will be erected at the
entrances to the neighborhood. A sample is attached. It is hoped that this
example will cause other neighborhoods to want to become involved. It may
provide the needed incentive to make citizens start to think about joining
to protect their neighborhoods. _It is sad to think that an influx of crime
has to be t e catalyst for this type of positive approach, but it of
as though that is the case.
Recommendation
That the City of Mendota Heights accept the concept of crime prevention and
Neighborhood Crime Watch as a viable program for the reduction and prevention
of crime and support the efforts of the citizens and Police Department in
establishing these programs.
Action Required
This memo is purely informational and unless directed otherwise by City
Council, the Police Department will continue with the Neighborhood Crime
-. --- Wa-tch--program. -
2 -
e.
Page 2
Phone •298-1102
0 Z"a lqkp go Ai ,11 3436 Ray Street P.O. Box 4097, San Diego, Ca. 92104
lrstaolisned 7yoi — Specializing in SILK ,Screen Printing Ot SICgns and Uecalcomantras
i
METAL ALL 'WEATHER
STANDARD STOCK ITEMS
There are three sizes of metal signs, 12"x 18", 18"x24" and 1.4"x36: All three were designed to be used on
public streets and roadways and are also popular for use on private property.
The steel signs are 18"x24"x24 gauge and 24"x36"x22 gauge. 'file aluminum signs are L`?"x 18"x.050,
18"x24"x.063 and 24"x36"x.063. This .063 aluminum is approximately 2 times as thick and stronger than
the steel stock signs. 'file aluminum is more corrosion resistant and more expensive. Check your signl
ordinance requirements with your municipality.
I
All metal signs have rounded corners, 12"x18", :Y4" radius, 18"x24" I 24"x36", have 1/" radius. The signshave a durable white enamel finish on two, sides with black and blue non -fade enamel printed on one side.
All signs are available with your referenced law agency, POLICE or SHERIFF; please specifiy on your order
form.
r
NEIGHBORHOOD STREET SIGNS ... the headline on the 12"x 18" and the 18"x24" is NEIGHBOR-
HOOD CRIME WATCH with the referenced agency ars POLICE or SHERIFF. The larger of the two, 18"x24",
is the most popular when used within a program to define an organized group of NEIGHBORHOOD
WATCH citizens.
COMMUNITY STREET SIGN ... the headline on the 24"x36" sign may be either WELCOME o�
WARNING and the referenced agency may be POLICE or SHERIFF. This sign is most effective at entrance.
to a community, apartment complex, or mobile home park and usually defines boundaries.
All metal signs have an area at the bottom reserved for a local message if desired, (see PERSONALIZED).
This reserved area size per sign is 2"x 12" for the 12"x 18"; 2"x 18" for the 18"x24"; '2'/:,"x 24" for the 24"x36";
example, use Emergency Police or Sheriff phone number or 911 ...
INSTALLATION may be accomplished using brackets or clamps as noted on the back of the
ORDER FORM .
rfroC!d'%Xrw• Y�nr%
Personalized signs are the same as above except as noted ... for example, the wording
could be "LEMON GROVE IS A. in lieu of "THIS IS A.
PLEASE ALLOW FIVE WORKING DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF ORDER FOR FABRICATION
WELCOME
NORTH PARK IS A
CRIME WATCH
COMMUNITY
C3
WE IMMEDIATELY REPORT
ALL SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES
TO OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT
YOUR OPTION
There is an additional charge
for personalizing the 24"x 36"
sign, (see item #11 on order
form) ...
OR ... DO IT YOURSELF ...
Order the stock sign read-
ing "THIS IS A.. ." There is
available space (21A"x24") at
the bottom of the sign, where
your local sign painter can
hand letter your message and
eliminate the production charge.
WARNING
LEMON GROVE IS A
CRIME WATCH
COMMUNITY
CE
WE IMMEDIATELY REPORT
ALL SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES
TO OUR SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
I
CAUTION:... when considering these metal signs to be installed on you rciIystreets. BE SURE THAI,
YOUR PROPOSED INSTALLATIONS COMPLY WITH YOUR LOCAL SIGN ORDINANCE. Check the
proper boxes on the order form for UTLCOME or 11WRNING an d POLICE or• SHERIFF.
0 1982 THE SIGN CEMITH IN(..
SMINUARD STOCK
ITEAIS
for immediate
deliven•
12" x 18"
NEIGHBORHOOD
CRIME WATCH
18"x24"
NEIGHBORHOOD
CRIME WATCH
rME
WE IMMEDIATELY REPORT
ALL SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES
`4", x
VVXffIqMG
THIS IS A
CRIME WATCH
COMMUNITY
CR
WE IMMEDIATELY REPORT
ALL SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES
TO OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT
24" x 36"
WELCOME
THIS IS A
CRIME WATCH
COMMUNITY
CR
WE IMMEDIATELY REPORT
All SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES
TO OUR SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
MEMO
DATE: January 26, 1984
70: Citv Council
17ROM: Paul R. Berg
__.Code Enforcement Officer__
DEJECT: Building Activity Report for January, 1984
CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE - 1984
NO. VALUATION FEE COLLECTED NO VALUATION FEE COLLE
SL.DG PERMITS
SPD
C/I
MISC.
Sub Total
TRD PERMMITS
Plbg
Wtr
Swr
Htg, AC
& Gas Pi
Sub Total
:,ICENSING
Contracto
Licenses
TOTAL
YEAR TO DATE - 1983
MOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee and
valuation amounts.
M-0
vt1LVt%I .LV1V
LLL I.VLLGI.l LL
1
62,654.84
531.30
1
62,654.84
531.30
1
140,706.60
883.58
9 1,124,678.00
6,127.11
9.
1,124,678.00
6,127.11
1
500.00
10.00
2
58,070.00
602.26
2
58,070.00
602.26
2
3,000.00
93.88
12
$1,245,402.84
$7,260.67
12
$1,245,402.84
$7,260.67
4
144,206.60
987.46
9
203.00
9
,
203.00
2
46.00
4
20.00
4
20.00
0
0
6
105.00
6
105.00
0
0
,e 12
1,055.50
12
1,055.50
4
255.00
31
1,383.50
31
1,383.50
6
301.00
is
112
2,800.00
112
2,800.00
105
2,625.00
155
$1,245,402.84
$11,444.17
155
$1,245,402.84
$11,444.17
115
$144,206.60
$3,913.46
MOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee and
valuation amounts.
1
i
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MINUTES
January 10, 1984
The regular meeting of,the Mendota Heights Park and Recreation Commission
was called to order at'7:30 P.M., by Chairperson Stein. Members present
were: 'Stein, Doffing, Knittig, McMonigal, and Schneeman. Also present
were Dewey Selander and Terry Blum.
Minutes of the December 13, 1983 meeting were approved as prepared.
Ice Rinks
I Dewey Selander said that hockey players on the pleasure rinks have been
an annual problem. He said the older kids playing boot hockey dominate the
hockey rink, forcing younger kids to play on the pleasure rinks, where they
interfere with the pleasure skaters. Doffing suggested that since the hockey
games use the width of a rink, additional nets would allow for two games on
a rink. It was decided that:
1. an extra pair of hockey nets will be placed in the Marie Park
hockey rink on a trial basis.
2. Selander will'direct rink attendants to report for work on time,
observe no smoking in the warming houses, and enforce no hockey
on the pleasure rinks.
Doffing said that Mend -Eagan hockey parents have been interested in maintaining
a rink in exchange forhockey practice time. Blum said the City has no
hockey. boards in storage. Blum will report at the next meeting on a possible
site for an additional hockey rink.
Blum was instructed to have repair work done on the switch box in the
Friendly Hills warming house.
Bike Trails
Stein reported that he met with City Administrator Kevin Frazell, and had
these suggestions for the Commission from the meeting:
1. Have informalplanning session with the City Council.
2. Get a professional -park planner involved in trail planning,
cost estimates, and funding.
3. Make better use of City engineer.
Also, at a later time with all members present, the Commission should discuss
and decide priorities.'! He said the City was presently revising its comprehensive
plan, which could make,the City eligible for Metro Council bikeway funds.
Bikeway Grant Application
Doffing moved that:
Park Minutes, January 10, 1984 Page Two
1. We apply for a grant from the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
2. We plan a meeting of the Commission and the appropriate members of staff
and City Council to discuss the bikeway system.
Motion passed.
Two plans will be submitted to the Mn/DOT Bikeway Construction Program:
1. Through Valley Park to Lilydale.
2. Along Lexington to Mendota Heights Road to Pilot Knob. This route
would connect Mendota Heights to the Eagan trails and the new I-494 bridge..
The meeting to discuss the Commission's long range plans for development of a
bike trail system and grant application to Mn, /DOT will be Tuesday, January 24, 1984,
at 7:30 P.M. in the Engineering Conference Room.
Doffing will attend the January 17th meeting of the City Council.
New Business
Singer reported that the cross country trails groomer is broken down and
will not be repaired this grooming season.
The next meeting will be February 14, at 7:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Marsha Knittig, Secretary
LIST OF 1984 CONTRACTOR'S TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY 7, 1984
A-abc Appliance Heating
Bjorklund Construction Company, Inc.
Bostrom Sheet Metal Works
E. L. Bulach Construction Company,
Carlson Sewer Company, Inc.
Construction Systems, Inc.
H. W. Cook and Sons
Determan Welding & Tank Service
E & H Earth Movers, Inc.
Equipment Supply, Inc.
Thomas Finn Company
Patrick M Gagnon, Inc.
Gas Supply, Inc. -
Dennis Greger Construction
Hayes Concrete
Hayes Contractors, Inc.
Hubbell Excavating
McDonald Homes
Nordquist`Sign Company'. -
Palmer Service Electric
Palmer Service Electric
Pine Bend Paving, Inc.
Rauchwarter, Inc.
St. Paul Utilities, Inc.
Timberline Builders, Inc.
Twin.City Furnace Company
Twin City Furnace Company
Welsh Construction Corporation
Wenzel Plumbing and Heating, Inc.
Inc.
Heating and Air Cond. License
General Contractor's License
Heating and Air Cond. License
Masonry License
Excavating License
General Contractor's License
Masonry License
General Contractor's License
Excavating License
Heating and Air Cond. License
General Contractor's License
General Contractor's License
General Contractor=s;License
General Contractor's License
Masonry License
General Contractor••'s;License.,,:.:
Excavating. License -
-. General Contractos'~L�ei�se„,;
SignsErecting,rL _cens-e-F
Heating and' Air” Coiid.= Lic:ensd..
Gas Piping License
Asphaltic/Concrete License
Excavating License
Excavating License
General Contractor's License
Heating and Air Cond. License
Gas Piping License
General Contractor's License
Excavating License
LIST OF 1984 CIGARETTE LICENSES TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY 7, 1984
Employee's Party Club
Par 3 Golf, Inc.
LIST OF 1984 RUBBISH HAULER'S LICENSES TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY 7,1984
-'" .Ben Oehrlein and Sons and Daughter
�.M,1 Remackel Trucking
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
January 24, 1984
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was called to
order by Chairperson Kruse at 8:02 o'clock P.M. The following members were
present: Kruse, Burke, Blesener, Stefani, and Morson. Frank was excused.
Also present were Planning Consultant Howard Dahlgren and City Engineer Ed
Kishel.
Chairperson Kruse noted that Sandy Butler had resigned from the Commission and
that Mayor Lockwood was in the process of finding a replacement for her. He also
noted that Blesener and Frank had been reappointed to three year terms on the
Commission.
APPROVAL OF Minutes of the November 22nd meeting had been submitted previously.
MINUTES Morson moved that the minutes be approved as submitted.
Burke seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
HEARING, Case Chairperson Kruse opened the meeting for the purpose of a public
No. 83-34,
hearing on an application from Mr. John Callahan, for a wetlands
Callahan,
permit and conditional use permit for fill for Lot 2, Willow
Wetlands
Springs Addition. This property is located on the northeast
Permit and
corner of Dodd Road and Marie Avenue. Mr. Arnold Kempe, attorney,
CUP for
and Mr. Callahan were present for the hearing. Mr. Kempe noted that
Fill
his client proposes to develop Lot 2, Willow Springs, which has 441
feet of frontage on Marie Avenue, into three single family lots.
Mr.:'•Keihpe noted Scheme'2 of the Engineering Feasibility Report,
dated January 18, 1984, (Job #8315, Imp. 83-6) which is the most
feasible plan, and also noted that Scheme 1 is acceptable to Mr.
Callahan, except that Scheme -1 would require a 50 foot easement,
whereas Scheme 2 requires a 40 foot easement. Mr. Kempe noted that
Scheme 3 is prohibitively expensive. He also noted that none of the
lots are potentially soldi and that Mr. Callahan will dedicate a
40 foot drainage easement on the northerly property line and a
50 foot drainage easement on the northwesterly portion of the
property line. Planner Dahlgren's suggestion that an additional
seven feet of right-of-way be dedicated for street purposes- along
Marie Avenue was discussed. Mr. Kempe felt that the requested
additional seven feet of right-of-way from the property on the north
side of Marie Avenue was unfair to his client. The subject was not
discussed further.
Commission members asked if relocation work could be done without
intruding on the northerly lot (Lot 1). Engineer Kishel stated
that there would be no need to go onto the northerly property in
reconstructing the channel. He also noted that there.will only
be minor excavation work done, and that it will involve only four
to five feet of excavation depth.
Commission members expressed concern over possible unstable soil
conditions. Engineer Kishel noted that if the ground soil is
Planning Commission Minutes, January 24, 1984 Page Two {
unstable, new material will be required prior to filling before an -
lots are sold. He also noted that Marie Avenue is curbed and stor.
sewers are in place and that Marie Avenue is considered a finished
street.
Chairperson Kruse asked for questions or comments from the
audience.
Mr. Larry Goff, 675 Marie Avenue, stated that his home is set back
70 feet from the curb. (Actually it is 60 feet from the property
line*). He also expressed concern with the setbacks for the new
structures, which are proposed at 30 feet for two homes and 40 feet
for the easterly most home. He noted that he is totally against the
proposal and that he does not want to look at backyards. He also
noted that his home is on Lot 4, Willow Springs, and that the owner of
Lot 3 lives out of state, but that should a time come when a home is
constructed on Lot 3,- that the home is to be set back 10 feet closer
to the street than his home, which would be 60 feet from the curb.
(Actually 50 feet from the property line*). He questioned why the
proposed homes on Lot 2 should be 30 feet and 40 feet, if they are
supposed to be built in 10 foot increments closer to the street.
Mr. Bob Gangl, 710 W. Marie Avenue (across the street from Lot 2),
felt that the land should not be disturbed in any way. He also
noted that Mr. Callahan has had offers to buy the land for develop-
ment the way it currently is.
Mrs. Doris Bisciglia, 663 W. Marie Avenue (.Lot 5, Willow Springs),
asked who would be assessed for any reconstruction work. She was
informed that Mr. Callahan will be responsible for any assessments.
She also'questioned how much fill is proposed on the lot to make the
lot level. Engineer Kishel responded that the fill will vary from
three to four feet to seven to eight feet per structure.
Planner Dahlgren commented on the front yard setbacks noting that
10 feet per lot difference is the standard setback.
Chairperson Kruse expressed concern over possible transplanting
or.replanting of trees, especially pine trees on the lot.
Commissioner Stefani asked if the creek has ever been dredged or
widened lately. Engineer Kishel responded no, but that the City
will maintain the drainage control.
Mr. Bob Gangl felt that there would be a greater chance of erosion
if the flow of water increases due to the straighter line flow
after channel relocation. Mr. Kishel stated that the water flow
will be controlled by two or three gabion drop structures and rip
rap.
Commissioner Stefani noted that the Engineering department should
take a close look at the water rate increase across Dodd Road, on
the south side of Marie Avenue, particularly as it might affect
his lot and several neighbors.
* In checking Mr. Goff's planning file, these are the correct dimensions from the
property line, not the curb.
Planning Commission Minutes, January 24, 1984 Page Three
Mr. Gangl again expressed concern over erosion control problems.
Commissioner Burke felt that all three proposed structures should
be set back 40 feet, rather than having two set back 30 feet and
the easterly most structure set back 40 feet.
Engineer Kishel said there would not be enough backyard room on
the center and westerly lot if they were required to be set back
40 feet.
Planner Dahlgren noted that people use their backyards more than
their front yards and recommended not crowding the backyards any
more than they are proposed.
Commissioner Burke still felt that the center lot should be set
back 40 feet, not 30 feet.
There being no further questions or comments from the audience,
Blesener moved to close the public hearing at 9:14 o'clock P.M.
Morson seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Commissioner Stefani noted that he did not want to approve setbacks
at this meeting, feeling that they -should be individual concerns at
the time of proposed construction.
Commissioner Stefani moved to recommend approval of the wetlands
permit and conditional use permit for fill in accordance with
Scheme 2, dated January 18, 1984, Job 48315, Improvement No. 83,
Project No;. 6, including channel relocation as proposed at this
meeting.
Commissioner Burke seconded the motion.
Commissioner Stefani amended his motion by withdrawing the fill
aspect.
Chairperson Kruse suggested approving the wetlands permit with the
placement of fill to provide a desireable building site on each lot
with the exception that no fill shall be placed within the drainage
easement above the proposed contours shown on Scheme 2.
Commissioner Blesener felt that the fill should not exceed the
contours of the drainage easement.
Planner Dahlgren suggested that the Commission could approve the
channel relocation and wetlands permit but that the rear yards be
filled in a manner so as to allow rear yard walkout basements. He
noted three items of concern:
1. The channel relocation.
2. The deposit of fill.
3. Establishment of setbacks from erosion to the creek.
Planning Commission Minutes, January 24, 1984 Page Four
Commissioner Blesener amended the original motion to say that
the contours should be looked at again by staff, to possibly
provide walkout basement potential on these lots, subject to
staff review.
Commissioner Burke seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 1, Stefani
Commissioner Stefani, amending his original motion, recommended
approving the creek rerouting and conditional use permit for fill,
with the back yard setback approved as shown on Scheme 2, omitting
the front yard setbacks, and establishing rear yard setbacks only.
There was no second to Stefani's second amendment to his original
motion, therefore the motion failed to pass.
Chairperson Kruse proposed that :
1. City staff study the rate of runoff of drainage before and after
relocation, in accordance with the Wetlands Ordinance.
2. Establishment of fill be made, limiting the fill to mineral soils,
with no asphalt or concrete, etc.
3. Provisions be made for sediment and erosion control measures.
4. Final drawings show all existing vegetation to remain, or any
plantings, with a high priority given to saving and/or moving
healthy trees in the reconstruction process.
Commissioner Blesener seconded the amendment motion.
Voting on the amendment:
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Voting on the original motion:
Ayes: 3
Nays: 2, Stefani and Burke
(For clarification, it appears that the motion consists of approval
of the wetlands permit and conditional use permit for fill and
construction of the channel change, in accordance with Scheme 2,
dated January 18, 1984, together with the various amended items
which include the four items proposed by Chairperson Kruse).
VERBAL REVIEW The Planning Commission Secretary gave a verbal review of the
Dornburg variance case that had been presented to and approved by
the City Council.
ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Commission,
Commissioner Morson moved that the meeting be adjourned.
Commissioner Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:52 o'clock P.M.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
February 2, 1984
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adm_ istrator
13, i�
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Creek Relocation
Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition
Jack Callahan
Job No. 8315
Improvement No. 83, Project No. 6
INTRODUCTION:
Jack Callahan, after several attempts to market his property at Marie Avenue
and Dodd Road failed because of numerous conflicts with City Ordinances,
commissioned Arnold Kempe to work with the City to make the land marketable.
DT9r1199TnN-
Mr. Callahan and Mr. Kempe have met with staff many times to work on solu-
tions and it was decided in these meetings that they should petition for
a public improvement to change the creek alignment. This would allow for
filling the site to make better lots. Mr. Callahan would then subdivide
the lot to help defray the expenses.
EdXishel has prepared a feasibility report that is attached. The report
has a recommendation for1creek realignment project by the City with sub-
sequent filling by the developer. Tampering with creeks and filling within
1-00 feet require wetlands permits, and wetlands permits need public hearing
by both the Planning Commission and Council. The Planning Commission hearing
has been held and the Planning Commission has recommended to Council to
grant the permit.
A staff presentation of the conditions will be made by myself Tuesday evening.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends granting a wetlands permit to the City and Mr. Callahan
allowing the creek alteration, filling and setback variances. Staff feels
this approval should be subject to Mr. Callahan executing a developer's
agreement with -the City outlining such concerns as timing of work, erosion
control, park contribution, platting, assessments and any other concerns
raised by Council this evening.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council wishes to implement staff recommendation, it should pass a motion
Approving the Wetlands Permit and Front Yard Setback Variances and a motion
adopting Resolution No. 84- , Accepting Engineer's Report, Ordering Improve-
ment and Preparation of Plans and Specifications.
Applicant
Name: C4 J— 1-,q # fi rl
Last
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
First
Case No.
0,
Date of Application Id
Fee Paid- /0 - e -
4t ,
In'ltial
S -'r- L
Address: C7, Y 11w, 11110111iI-ttlljv /7'V 1-t (yr, it
Number & Street City State Zip
Telephone Number: 0 0 2---6�r
(f4 '-6
Owner
Name:
Last First Initial
Address: // e.
Number & Street City State zip
Street Location of Property in Question:
Zo
b4j
L) D 7-,
Legal Description of Property:
Type of Request: Rezoning
Variance
Conditional Use Permit
Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D.
Minor Conditional Use Permit
Subdivision Approval
Plan Approval
Wetlands Permit
Other
v
Applicable City Ordinance Number / O Section
Present Zoning of Property:
Present Use of Property:
Proposed Zoning of Property: �G.s
Proposed Use of Property:Fi�
Number of people intended to live or work on premises:
I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional
material are true. / /0 1
ignature of Applicant
Date
Received by (title)
NOTE: The following plans shall be drawn and attached to this application:
A. Applications involving a Variance shall submit the following plans:
Date Received Initial
1. Site Development Plan
2. Dimension Plan
3. Landscape Plan
4. Grading Plan
B. Applications involving -a Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit or Subdivision
shall submit the following:
1. Sketch Plan
2. Abstractors Certificate ti
(If the subdivision involves cutting of existing parcel into two or more lots).
C. Applications involving -a Wetlands Permit shall -submit the following:
1. A full & adequate description of all phases of the operation &/or proposed
physical changes. '
2. A topographic map of the area. Contour intervals shall be drawn at two (2)
foot intervals at a horizontal scale of 1" = 1,000' or larger.
3. A detailed site plan of the proposal showing proposed drainage, grading & landscapi
4. A site design map showing the location of existing and future man-made features
within the site and to a distance of five hundred (500) feet surrounding the site.
January 25, 1984
NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR WETLANDS PERMIT AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR FILL
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights will meet at 7:30 o'clock P,M., on Tuesday, February 7th, 1984, in
the City Hall Council Chambers, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights,
Minnesota, to consider an application from Mr. John Callahan for a wetlands
permit and a conditional use permit to place fill on the following des-
cribed property:
Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition
More particularly, this property is located on the northeast corner of
Dodd Road and Marie Avenue.
This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance Numbers
402 and 401. Such persons as desire to be'heard with reference to the
proposed wetlands permit and conditional use permit for fill will be heard
at this meeting.
.Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
PETITION FOR SURFACE WATER COURSE IMPROVEMENT AND WAIVER OF'HEARING
The undersigned being the owner of the following des-
cribed property located in the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota
County, Minnesota, to -wit; Lot 2, Willow Spring, pursuant to the
provisions of Minn. Stat. Sec. 42.9.031, Subd. 3, the undersigned
hereby petitions the City Council of the City of Mendota Sleights
to design an appropriate water surface water course channel generally
along the north 25 feet approximately and the westerly 25 feet
approximately of said lot, for surface water course drainage
across said lot and to permit the grading and filling of the balance
of said lot to approximately the same elevation as Marie Avenue,
or in the alternative, pursuant to the aforesaid statute, the under-
signed petitions the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights
to design and construct said water course so as to facilitate the
development of said land for single family residential housing
and to assess all costs in the design of or in the design and
construction of said,improvements against said property.
The'•.undersigned %further specifically waives all notice
and require ment• of "any'hearing on' said improvement and assessment
therefor, and further waives the requirement of publication
and mailed notice of or with respect to any such hearing or hearings.
The undersigned further agrees to dedicate to the City
(if Mendota Heights the easement. over the above described property
vt:quired by said project if requested by the City of
Hondota HL;ights.
DATED, this �L 'lay of May, 1983. °
i
IL
John R. Callahan
V
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
24 January 1984
83-34
John Callahan
Northeast Corner of Dodd Road and
Marie Avenue
Approval of Wetlands Permit and
Conditional Use Permit for Fill,
Variances for Front Yard Requirements
1• This proposal was initially considered by the Planning Commission at its
November meeting at which time the general concept was explained relative
to the development of the land into single family residential lots.
Since that time, staff has met several times with the developer, and the
Engineering department has prepared extensive studies suggesting a
potential solution for the development of the land and the relocation
of the drainage way through the property. It would appear to us that
the Engineering staff has done an excellent job of determining possible
ways of handling this very difficult site.
2. Attached to this report are the comments from the Engineering staff, and
illustrations of three potential solutions for the handling of the drain-
age system and the division of the land. You will note that staff
recommends approval of Plan No. 2, which moves a portion,of the drainage -
way northerly so as to allow for additional development depth on the
three lots that are proposed in that plan. We concur with the Engineering
staff that this represents the most reasonable and feasible solution for
the development of the land.
3. In consultation with the Engineering staff, there is one additional
consideration that might be taken into account with respect to the
platting of the land. To the west is an 80 foot right-of-way; which
is the normal required right-of-way width for an M.S.A. street, which
Marie Avenue is from Delaware to Lexington. Thus,r.it_would.be appropriate
to consider an additional seven feet of right-of-way from this property
on the north side of Marie Avenue. -
4'.- The attached plan indicating Scheme No. 2 indicates the location of the
proposed houses on this property. We suggest in this case, rather than, _
wait for the individual development of plans for the lots, that the
setback variance with respect to the drainageway and to the street be
established at this time. The Wetlands Ordinance requires a setback
of 100 feet from the drainageway. In this case, the westerly residence
would be located within '38 feet of the drainageway, the center structure
would be located approximately 70 feet from the drainageway, and the
easterly most structure would be located 60 feet from the drainageway.
In view of the circumstances on this site, it would appear appropriate
that these dimensions would be workable in view of the proposed drainage
improvement contemplated as a part of this development. This improvement,
- 2 -
by the way, would be accomplished as a City engineering project, would
be designed by the engineering staff, and constructed under their
supervision. The cost of that improvement would be assessed against
the lots in the same manner as a public improvement on the street
frontage. Scheme 2 also indicates the proposed contours of the land
which will require filling of portions of the property. It would
appear to us that the proposal, as designed, is appropriate for
the ultimate development of the lot and the fill required to
accomplish the development could be approved as a part of the Wetlands
permit under consideration by the Planning Commission at this time.
Thus, for the purposes of the wetlands approval, the approval could
stipulate that the improvement of the drainageway, and the deposit
of fill on -the land shall be done in accordance with Scheme #2, dated
January 18, 1984.
5. With respect to the front yard requirement, we suggest that the Planning
Commission and Council consider approval of the variances to yard
requirements as indicated on the Scheme 2 plan. In the case of an
established setback on a street which is greater than 30 feet, the
Ordinance requires that the homes be set back in a manner so as.to
make a gradual change from the house setback, the most to the house
which is set back at the normal 30 foot setback. In this case there
are no houses, of course, on the three lots in question, and there is
no existing home on the immediate lot to the east. However, the
next lot to the east is setback 60 feet. Thus, in keeping with the
spirit of the Ordinance we suggest that the setback be established
on the easterly most lot at 40 feet, and the two westerly most lots
at 30 feet. It would thus be required that the next most easterly lot
to this property would be set back at 50 feet.
6. If the Planning Commission and Council approve the Wetlands Permit and
variances as outlined herein, the applicant can then petition the City.
for the development of the public improvement in respect to the drainage -
way. During that process, the applicant could, and should, file an
application for subdivision of the land into the three lots as.proposed.
Thus, when the drainageway improvement is complete, and the fill has
been deposited, the lots would be in a position for sale and development.
7. One of the principle features of the proposed*solution as evolved by the
staff, is that the tree growth to the north of the westerly most lot and
the growth contiguous to Dodd Road would be retained. Thus as traffic
passes on Dodd Road, there would be no substantial change in the aesthetic
quality of the site as viewed from that direction. Obviously with the
changing of the channel, and filling of the land, a substantial number
of trees on the remainder of the land will be affected. You are perhaps
aware of the fact that in the past few years that Dutch Elm disease has
decimated a.,.substantial amount of the quality tree growth on the property
that existed at one time. The applicant informs us that he has paid a
total of $7,000 for the removal of several dozen trees due to the Dutch
Elm disease problem.
8. In summary, it would appear that the proposed overall solution as
evolved through the Engineering studies, represents the most reasonable
way in which to develop the property under the conditions as they now
exist.
f1 to]
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO 3
January 18, 1984
TO: City Council
FROM: Edward F. Kishel
City Engineer
SUBJECT: Feasibility Report
Creek Relocation - Callahan
Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition
Job No. 8315
Improvement No. 83, Project No. 6
The following constitutes a revised feasibility report with re-
gard to a proposed creek relocation on Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition
for the purpose of subdividing the lot into several smaller lots for
development.
As shown on the attached drawings, the lot has approximately 442
feet of frontage along Marie Avenue and is about 152 feet deep. This
means that with proper location of lot lines, the parcel can be divided
into 3 or possibly 4 smaller lots, provided that set back requirements,
wetlands variances, environmental requirements and others will have
been met.
In reviewing the matter, Staff has come up with 3 possible
schemes varying in cost and environmental impact. The schemes are
intended to show that with proper planning and site grading, the pro-
perty can be utilized for residential development. They are as fol-
lows:
SCHEME 1
This scheme suggests a three (3) lot division with minimum creek
relocation and minimum tree removal. It also provides for a visual
buffer on the North and West sides of the site.
It appears that about 240 to 250 feet of channel change, 2 to 4
feet deep, will be required. Rip -rap, the removal of 15 to 20 trees
and ground cover restoration will also be required.
It is estimated that the cost will be about $5,000.00 including
fees and contingencies.
The placement of dwellings will require setback variances and it
is anticipated that the westerly 2 units will not be able to utilize
basement walkouts.
1
SCHEME 2
This scheme also utilizes a 3 lot subdivision with a 250 long
channel change to be located adjacent to the north lot lines. So as to
minimize the cost and to leave as much wooded area as possible, the
existing creek along Dodd Road will remain intact allowing for buffer
and undisturbed creek flow for erosion control. Thus, a minimum amount
of trees and brush removal will be required along the north property
lines. Additional erosion control will be utilized by the use of
gabion drop structures to be determined and located after a construc-
tion project is ordered.
Easements as shown on the drawings will be required as part of
any proposed platting. The Developer'has already agreed to this.
The channel change, tree removal, installation of gabions and rip
rap as well as restoration, is estimated to cost $10,000.00, including
fees and contingencies.
SCHEME 3
This scheme considers a 4 lot subdivision with extensive channel
change work.
As indicated on Sheet 3 of 3, a channel will be constructed along
the north and west sides of the parcel. Along Dodd Road the channel
change will come within 20 feet of the curb line necessitating bank
protection on both sides of the creek for a distance of about 150 feet.
An alternate method would be to install a 48 inch pipe line along
Dodd Road to the relocated creek on the north side of the plat. This
also requires the removal of the tree buffer along the north side.
To do the above proposed work will cost an estimated $24,000.00
including fees and contingencies.
The suggested setbacks along Marie Avenue are intended to main-
tain an orderly transition from the normal City setback to the unusual
setback in Willow Springs Addition established because of the lot
depths.
Staff recommends that Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition be developed
as suggested in Scheme No. 2.
The above discussed schemes suggest three possible solutions to
the utilization of Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition. The Owner has been
informed of the suggested schemes and has indicated that Scheme No. 2
is preferred. He will now petition for the construction of Scheme No.
2 as a public storm water project. Applicant proposes to have all
costs assessed against his property.
2
.During the past several years, staff has had many inquiries
regarding the potential development of Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition.
The fact that it is in a declared wetlands area, has a meandering creek
flowing through it, is low land and will require considerable fill to
make it usable has caused a delay in its development. The Owner now
feels it is necessary to do something with the property and is pro-
ceeding accordingly.
Staff also feels that Scheme No. 2 is reasonable, is feasible,
and is herewith recommending it for construction.
Before proceeding with a construction project, the Council should
be aware that wetlands permits for filling and setback will be re-
quired, a conditional use permit (C.U.P.) for filling will need to be
processed together with the proposed plat, and front yard building
setback variances will be required. Planning Commission review to-
gether with public hearings for the platting, wetlands permit and
filling will also be required.
3
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND
PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STORM SEWERS TO SERVE
LOT 2, WILLOW SPRINGS ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 83, PROJECT NO. 6)
WHEREAS, the developer has heretofore submitted a petition for improve-
ments and waiver of hearing to the City of Mendota Heights for storm
sewers to serve Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has submitted his report to the City Council
with respect to the proposed storm sewer construction to serve Lot 2,
Willow Springs Addition; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer reported that the proposed improvement and
construction thereof were feasible and desirable and further reported
on the proposed costs of said improvement and construction thereof; and
WHEREAS, all costs of the improvement is to be assessed against Lot 2,
Willow Springs Addition.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the report of said City Engineer be and is hereby re-
ceived.
2. That it is advisable, feasible, expedient and necessary that
the City of Mendota Heights construct the above described improve-
ments, and it is hereby ordered that said improvement be made.
3. That the City Engineer be and he is hereby authorized and
directed to prepare plans and specifications for said improvement.
4. That said improvement shall hereafter be known and designated
as Improvement No. 83, Project No. 6.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this Seventh
day of February, 1984.
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
1
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
qz&w4 oared
CIVIC ASSOCIATION, INC. JAN 2
Mendota Heights, Minn.
Fred Lambrecht
2182 Aztec Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
454-5418
January 24, 1984
Mayor and City Council
City of Eagan
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Request is hereby made on behalf of the Friendly
Hills Civic Association, Inc. that the Environmental Impact
Statement now being prepared with respect to the proposed
location of a horse racing track in the City of Eagan include
an assessment of all relevant human, animal, property and
environmental impacts of the proposed track on the City of
Mendota Heights.to`the same extent as those impacts are
being included with reference to the City of Eagan, and in
particular, that the impacts of noise from the crowds
expected to be at the track, from the public address system
to be used at the track and from aircraft be carefully and
fully assessed. In addition, it is asked that the impacts
of aircraft noise on the site itself, both in relation to
the animals to be raced and stabled there and on the
facilities used at the proposed track site to communicate
to spectators during racing events also be carefully and
fully assessed.
It is also requested that the Friendly Hills Civic
Association, Inc. which is the homeowners association for
nearly 300 homes in the Friendly Hills and Delaware Crossing
areas of Mendota Heights, be furnished with two copies of
the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and with the EIS
when each has been'completed. Such copies should be sent to:
Mayor and City council
City of Eagan
January 24, 1984
Page Two
Friendly Hills Civic Association, Inc.
c/o Fred W. Lambrecht, Vice President
2182 Aztec Lane
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120
Very truly yours,
Fred Lambrecht, Vice President
Friendly Hills Civic Association
/jat
cc: City of Mendota Heights
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Metropolitan Council
PETITION OPPOSING THE PROPOSED
EAGAN RACETRACK
The undersigned all being residents of the City of
.Mendota Heights, Minnesota hereby register their opposition
to the proposed horse racing track in the City of Eagan and
`ask that copies of this Petition -be delivered to the officials
f•'.'the: Cit o,f MendotaHe:' H"ts-the Metro oli:tan., rir o'rt_s:'=:'"F=
- Y 9 - _ P..• Lp
a. .. r
'' -Commission, the Metropolitan `Council` the City of `E`agan and'.
to such other governmental bodies, agencies and other - -
organizations as may -be appropriate.
NAME ADDRESS
1.
M
0
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
p
:4.
-5.
0
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
p
'11101MAS G. MAIRS /jN ( 3 QQ
1707 DF:I.AN•ARF: AVENUE: JA
SAINT PAM.• MINNESOTA 55118
January 29, 1984
Mayor Robert G. Lockwood
750 S. Plaza Dr.-,
a. w MD
e. ri d o t a Heigh :t sr;_. .. , a or: . , • = _
�..
... :� _ .,. F i - - - i . . -a">t� , .+«....tea. �•id^a.�',
Dear May Lockwood:
I write to urge you and the City Council to vigorously
oppose the location of a horse racing track in Eagan,
adjacent to our southern border.
To transform lovely country to a grandstand and park-
ing lot with the resulting crowds andltraffic problems,
would be an incredible mistake. Mendota Heights should:..,
not have to suffer°because of an ill-considered proposal-.",".'
~• I trust that-�your collective and unanimous oppositio'ri'=:s
9L will be made known'to`the Racing Commission and such
other entities as may be involved.
Thank you. 4
Sincerely,
Thomas G. Mairs
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: City Council
,FROM: Mary Ann DeLaRosa
Deputy Clerk
February 1, 1984
SUBJECT: Appointment Filling Vacancy on Planning Commission
Mayor Lockwood has informed staff that Kathleen Ridder has agreed
to fill out Sandy Butler's unexpired term on the Planning Commission,
effectively immediately, with said term to expire on January 31, 1985.
As you may know, Kathy had served on the Planning Commission since
July, 1972, and was Chairperson from 1974 to the time of her resignation
on April 1, 1979, when she resigned to accept appointment as Metropolitan
Council District 15 representative.
Action Required
If Council concurs with this appointment, it should, by motion,
appoint Kathleen Ridder to fill out the unexpired term of Sandy Butler,
to the Planning Commission.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
February 1, 1984
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. Frazell
City Administrator
SUBJECT: Request by Councilmember Witt for attendance at the annual
Congressional City Conference of the National League of Cities
Attached is an announcement from the National League of Cities,
concerning their 1984 Congressional City Conference. The purpose of
this annual conference is to provide a link between local government
officials and Washington on municipal issues.
Councilmember Witt would like to attend this conference, and as a
member of the League of Minnesota Cities Board of Directors, the Minnesota
League is picking up a portion of her cost for attendance. She is asking
that the City of Mendota Heights pick up the remaining cost. Liz will pro-
vide the Council with further cost details and justification at the meeting
on Tuesday evening.
BUDGET IMPACT
The 1984 Administraion department budget as adopted, from which this
requested expense would come, contains sufficient funds "in the Travel,
Conference and Schools, and Contingency line items to cover this request.
ACTION REQUIRED
To consider and act upon Councilmember Witt's request. ,
Respectfully submitted,
Kevin D. Frazell
City Administrator
attachment
1:S 17, REMEMBER
/'ebnelirr.rury 17,19(1.34—Deadline for
advance registration. After this
(Lite, all delegates must register or
site.
jA
ADV vNCE PKOGB" Feb),uaa7, 24, 1984—Deadline for
cancellations. Cancellation letters
must be postmarked by this (Lite
SATURDAY MARCH]
Carly Registration. open all
day. Special Interest Group
Meetings
WOMEN IN MUNICIPAL
GOVERNMENT SEMINAR
Locally -elected women will play
a major role in increasing voter
turn -out for the 1984 election
and in influencing national poli-
cies and platforms on issues im-
portant to women.
In this special half-day seminar,
participants will learn how to
become more effective within
their communities and political
parties, including workshops on
how to improve campaign tech-
niques, how to work with the
national party conventions, and
v to increase the participa-
, of women as voters and
candidates for office.
Fee for the seminar is $40.
POLICY LEADERS
SEMINAR
The biggest problem facing
cities today is money: where to
find it, how to raise it, how to
invest it, and how to spend it
effectively.
At this day -long session, partici-
pants will learn how to evaluate
the impact of recent federal leg-
islation on local government
bonding and borrowing capac-
ity, how to cost and price city
services, how to establish realis-
tic user charges and set up city
hall "profit centers;' how to get
the most out of a municipal cash
and investment management
program, and how to evaluate
municipal expenditures for cost-
effectiveness. Special emphasis
will be placed on innovative fi-
ing arrangements for city
ces, contracting out oppor-
tunities, and "service shedding"
Fee for the seminar is $75.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
SEMINAR
In the future, city telecommuni-
cations systems will rely not
only on sophisticated cable net-
works but also 011.1 number of
other telecommunications tech-
nologies. To develop compre-
hensive local policies which
meet the needs of both the city
government and citizens, local
leaders will need to assess the
full range of telecomnhuanica-
tions technologies available and
structure appropriate organiza-
tional and institutional arrange-
ments to insure effective co-
ordination.
This clay -long seminar will ex-
amine the relationship between
cable communications and
other telecommunications tech-
nologies, with special emphasis
on emerging developments in
telephone and microwave tech-
nology and computer data base
systems..Workshops also will
discuss how to plan, staff, and
organize a city teleconhnhunica-
tions system, and will include a
special session on telecommuni-
cations planning for small cities.
Fee for the seminar is $75.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
SEMINAR
Exporting is a key component
of international trade develop-
ment. It's practical and profit-
able, not only for large corpora-
tions but for the many small and
medium -sired businesses which
operate in cities. And when
local businesses profit, cities
reap big dividends as well.
This clay -long seminar will high-
light techniques city officials can
use to help local businesses
move into the international
marketplace. It will feature ses-
sions on how to set up a city in-
ternational trade department,
how to establish an export busi-
ness counseling center, how to
identify new foreign markets
and develop strategies for
reaching them, how to find
sources of export financing, anal
how to deal with issues relating
to Shipping and docunucntati,m
SUNDAY MARCH 4
* Policy Committee Meetings:
NLC;s five standing conhmittees
will hold open sessions to hear
guest speakers on current issues
and to plan their work agendas
for the year.
* Delegates' Luncheon: An ad-
ministration official will address
the conference on a key urban
issue.
* Welcoming Reception: Sun-
day evening's reception %gill
give city officials a chance to
meet their colleagues from all
parts of the country and to
share experiences and solutions
to common problems.
MONDAY MARCH 5
* Breakfast Session: NLC's
president will outline the
League's lobbying priorities for
1984.
* Workshops: Morning and af-
ternoon workshops will cover
key legislative and regulatory is-
sues, the important policy mak-
ers in Congress and the execu-
tive branch, and the points to
emphasize in lohbying.
* Delegates' Luncheon: A con-
gressional leader will address
the conference on a key urban
issue.
* State League Lobbying Ses-
sions: State municipal leagues
will meet with their congres-
sional delegations to set forth
urban viewpoints on key issues.
__
TUESDAY MARCH 7
* Visits to Capitol Hill: State
municipal leagues and individ-
u:d city officials will meet Nvith
congressional delegations to set
ti>rth urban yicWpa,ints on hey
tion charge. There are no refunds
for cancellations after this (Late.
HOW TO REGISTER
To register for the 1984 Congres-
sional -City Conference, fall out tlx:
registration form and return it
with your check or city purchase
order to die NLC Conference Reg-
istration Center by February 17,
1984.
Each delegate, guest, speaker,
member of the press, and any
other conference participant inial
register. (There is no charge for
press registration.)
No telephone registrations or can-
cellations will be accepted. Dead-
line for advance r egwi ation is
FebrlraLy 17, 1944. Payment must
be included with advance registra-
tions. People unable to meet die
February 17 deadline will have to
register at die meeting and make
their own hotel resenations.
Refunds udll be rruule for cancella-
tions rvicekvcl by Febniai), 24, sub-
ject to a $25 cancellation clw)ge.
Cancellation letters must be post-
marked by this date. No telephone
cancellations will be accepted. No
partial refunds will be made if you
decide not to attend particular
functions.
HOTEIS
If you need hotel acconhmoxLa-
tions, please check die appropriate
box on die registration form. NLC
will not make a hotel reservation
for you unless you have registered
for die conference. Rooms mill lx,
aLwgned on a fill[ collie firy
sc�z ed Ixt�is. The conference will
be held at die W ushington i-lilton.
Special Reduced Air Fares
4Xcial unrestr-rcled reahrced air
fares lxive been negodated with
several carrie)sforattenaleesat the
1984 congravional C%I P
col Terence. %hese fares are
available exCILISk-Cly tbroitg1? the
N/.C.'Corrference %icrvel Center.
Discounts available r wr qe fart,
.30% off Corel., to sn/x,aane r lc rel
with no nwrictionc on len,Slb u/
slaw, etc. PhYme(N00).)68-.i'39 or
r'O1) 771-0460 mdti In
REGISTRATION FORM
Please Type or Print
Name
Title
City or Organizat
Mailing Add
Ci
HOTEL ACCOAIMODATION RESERVATION REQUEST (Please tyle or print)
❑ Please make nw hotel reser:uions -.is indicated lelow.
Sex h9 P ❑ 1 will make illy own housing a rramgenlents.
To accconnimlate ),our special needs, e.g., wheelchair accessible rooms,
please contact the Conference Registration Center
Arrival Date_/_I Tinle
State zip
Telephone ( )
Family Menlbers Attending (No registration fee required):
Spouse Full Name Sex NI F
Child
Clli
I. ❑ This is my first Congressional -City Conference.
2. E31 would like travel assistance frons the NLC Conference
Travel Center.
3. Check applicable Conference Registration fee and enter total
fees in the right hand column:
EARLY REGISTRATION FEES
(Postmarked by,February 17, 1984)
❑ $175 Direct Member Fee EiNl
❑ $175 Research Associate Member Fee $ ER
❑ $215 Non -Member & Indirect Member Fee $ EX
❑ $215 Other $ EZ
SPECIAL PRE -CONFERENCE SEMINARS (March 3)
❑ $75 Policy Leaders $ PI.
❑ $75 Telecon-irnLill icatiOlIS
❑ $75 International Trade
TC
$ IT
❑ $40 Women in Municipal Government $ WM
TOTAL REGISTRATION FEES $
,Make check payable for the total amount of the conference
registration fees to: NATIONAL LEAGUE OP CITIES
*Cancellation letters must he postmarked by Feb. 24 and are
subject to a $25 cancellation fee.
*No telephone registrations or cancellations will he accepted.
Mparitlre Date_/_/_Time
I will be sharing my room with:
Co -Occupant Nano
Address
City
Single
Slane 7_ip
Canterbury (a)
Telephone ( )
$85
CREDIT CARD AUTHORIZATION
The NLC Conference Registration Cen-
Credit Card Contpam
ter and/or the NLC Conference Travel
55
Center are authorized to use the above
Card Number
card to guarantee myhotel reser•:n!ons
84
and/or to issue airline tickets reserved
Dank Number
by me to attend this conference. I
Espiration [)ate
understand that one night's roost•
115
charge will be billed through this card
115
if I fail to show a for my :Lssigned
Sheraton washington (h)
housing on the confirmed date unless I
95
have cancelled my reservation with the
Cardholder Signature Date
hotel at least 48 hours in advance. l also
Washington I lihon (i)
understand that I may return :my un.
Indicue your first-clitke hutel with dk number 1,
used tickets for travel purchased by this
Numberthur hutels from 2 to 11 in order of vour
card for full refund as; a result of this
preferenty. You into number all hotels.
cancellation unless the fare terms pub-
CemultdwconferenceRegi.watiun Center for
lishedbytheairlinecarrvacancellation
infonn:uiun on suite,,
penalty.
Choice Hotel
Single
Double
Canterbury (a)
$75
$85
Dlll)olll Plal%il (b)
70
85
EnlbassYsuites (c)
55
65
1lighla11d (d)
68
84
I IUlidall• Inn (e)
55
60
\layllow er (f)
95
115
Ritz-Carlt it (g)
115
115
Sheraton washington (h)
80
95
Shoreham (i)
80=85
90.95
Washington I lihon (i)
58-101
75.119
%X'ashinglon Marriott (k)
85
95
* All sessions will be held at the Washington Hilton
1'lmse return this form
with your registration
payment m:
NLC Conference Registration
Center,
P.O. &nx 17413
Dulles International Airport,
Washington, D.C. 20041,
Nome: (202) 626.3200
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: City Council
FROM: Orvil J. Johnson
City Administrator
SUBJECT: City Hall Lease
February 1, 1984
Several months ago the City Council directed that staff negotiate a new
lease with DCR Company for general office space, police department and
engineering department.space. Some negotiations.were conducted prior to
Kevin's arrival. However, final negotiations have been accomplished within
the last several weeks. The proposed lease contains the following specifics.
The new lease contains a firm commitment for three years (August 1, 1984
through July 31, 1987) and the City has the right to extend the lease for two
additional years. The leasing rat.e*is.to be $9.84 per square foot per year for
the first three years; and then $10.09 per square foot for the fourth and fifth
year, if they are exercised. The lease is for the same identical space as now
occupied. That is to say, the general office space, the engineering and police
space is firmly committed. The Community Room/Council Chambers is to be used
as in the past, i.e., City has first choice and is to provide the scheduling.
The above rates include all services. There are no heat, electricil or
custodial expenses. Several small expenditures are being furnished by DCR to
refurbish the Administrator*'s office when I leave.
The present rental rate is $6.00 per square foot, per year, plus a tax
escalation clause. In 1983, we paid an additional $1562 as our portion of tax
escalation over 19.76 taxes.- The proposed lease now starts with the 1984 taxes,
the tax escalation only being applicable for the taxes paid in 1985 and beyond.
The increase over the seven years amounts to about a 7% annual increase. Kevin
and I are both satisfied that the rate of $9.84 per square foot per year for
office space, including all services, is very competitive.
The 1984 Budget was not prepared with this type of increase in mind. The
annual increase would amount to about $13,300 ($50,000-36,740) per year. Since
the lease date is August 1, the new rate would be applicable for five months.
This results in a deficit of about $5,500 for the 1984 calendar year. This
total breaks down to about $3,800 for Administration and Police and about
$1,700 for Engineering. This reflects poor financial planning, however, it ist
qf,iite insignificant compared to the surpluses accumulated during the years
1982 and 1983, and probably will occur in 1984 also.
The three year firm commitment terminating July 31, 1987, gives some amount
of time to plan for a new City Hall if that is the wish. If not, the contract
can be extended through July 31, 1989, at the established rate thereby providing
two additional years for planning purposes.
I recommend that the proposed Lease be approved and the Mayor and Clerk
be authorized to sign the lease.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
fu'('u(�i
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. Frazell
City Administrator
February 1, 1984
SUBJECT: Fire Chief and Assistant Chief Job Descriptions
INTRODUCTION
At the January 17th meeting, Council approved a plan of action for
recruiting a new Chief and Assistant Chief for the Fire department. That
plan called for Council consideration of job specifications at the February
7th meeting. The attached specifications are submitted for your consideration.
R A CT(r.R nTTTM
At the January 17th meeting, Council approved a proposed strategy and
time line for recruiting a new Chief and.Assistant Chief for the Fire
department, and completing a comprehensive review of the department. For
your review, a copy of that proposed time line from the January 17th meeting
is attached. On Wednesday, January 18th, I met with the firefighters at
their monthly business meeting to explain'the plan that had been adopted
by Council, and what we were hoping to accomplish. In brief, I felt that
the meeting was a positive one. I invited the firefighters to individually
drop by or call if they had further comments they wished to convey. Several
have taken the opportunity to do so since that time.
As indicated on the time line, February 7th is the date for Council
consideration of job descriptions for the two positions, and for stipulating
the method of application. The understanding is that the applications will
then be received through March 2,.. 1984.
Attached for. your review and consideration is a proposed job announce-
ment which I have prepared. Since I think it is fairly self-explanatory, I
won't go into a.detailed elaboration in this memo. There are, however, a
couple of brief comments.
First, the job description or announcement puts primary emphasis on
that quality that we call "leadership". As I talked with firefighters and
City staff members about what we should be looking for in a new Chief, this
term was used over and over. I think the point is that while the Chief and
Assistant Chief obviously have to have technical skills, the.most distinguish-
ing requirement is that these officers should be able to provide the department
with some direction in defining its mission and purpose within the community and
in the City organization, then lead it in getting organized to carry out that
responsibility.
The second point I would make is that I have decided to suggest that we
not establish any minimum requirements for the job. Because we are limiting
ourself to consideration of in-house applicants at this point, I do not want
- 2 -
to adopt any requirements that could eliminate some good candidates. Therefore,
I have worded the job announcement more in terms of the criteria that we will
be looking for in a new Chief, and the factors of one's.background and person-
ality that we will be considering in evaluating whether a particular candidate
meets those criteria.
ACTION REQUIRED
Council should consider the job announcement as proposed by the City
Administrator, making any changes it deems appropriate, then pass a motion
approving the job announcement, and calling for applications to be received
through 4:30 P.M., Friday, March 2, 1984.
Respectful y submitted,
Kevin D. Frazell
City Administrator
attachment
FLKE. D[YAK?mCNT
OFFICE'R SELEc'r[ON AND DOCUMENT AMENDMENT
PROPOSED TIMETABLE
February 7 - Council comai6aca and approves job descriptions for the
position of Chief and Assistant Chief, stipulates method
of application,*and calls for receipt of applications.
March 2 - Deadline for applications.
March 13 - Council workshop to review applications received, cociog
against criteria established in the job description.
Determines persons to serve -on interview team - (In
addition to Council and the Administrator, other possible
interview members might include a representative of the
Fire department who did not apply, the Police Chief, the
Fire Marshall, or the Fire Chief of a neighboring community.)
March 13-30 - Preparation for interviews:
Interview teams assembled
Questions prepared
Times scheduled and confimed
April 7 - Interviews held (April 14 and/or 21 as back-up dotes or
for re -interview).
May I - Council makes appointments of :two positions:
Assistant Chief to become Chief on October I
Assistant Chief as of October 1
May 1 -Sept. 30 - New Chief (designee) works with current Chief.
May 15 - Council appoints committee to review Fire Department operating
documents, including Ordinance No. 101. Potential committee
members include:
Chief Designee Fire Department representative
Current Chief Councilmember
City Administrator Fire Marshall
Police Chief
July 3 - Council receives Committee report re: organization documents
and possible amended Ordinance.
July 17 - New Ordinance adopted (if necessary)'
Auguet I - Begin process of selecting new Caytoiny, per amended organ-
ization documents and ordinance.
October i - New officers (Chief, Assistant Chief, Captains) take office.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
POSITIONS) ANNOUNCEMENT
FIRE CHIEF
ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF
The City Council is receiving applications for two positions, Fire
Chief and Assistant Fire Chief. The position of Assistant Chief is
currently vacant, and the position of Chief will be vacant upon resignation
of the incumbent in September, 1984.
Application is currently open only to existing members of the Mendota
Heights Fire department. It is the Council goal to evaluate the applicants
and.make appointments by May 1, 1984. The person selected as Chief will
serve as Assistant Chief from approximately May 1st through September 30,
1984, at which time he will assume the position of Fire Chief. This five
month period will be a time of training under the current Chief. The
person selected as Assistant Chief will be appointed to that office when
the newly selected Chief assumes.that position, approximately September
30, 1984. -
Fire Chief Job Responsibilities
Leadership - Although a part-time position, the Fire Chief has the status
of a department head within the -City organization. As such, the Chief is
responsible to exercise general leadership and administration over the
affairs of the Fire department. This involves ongoing assessment of the
fire protection needs of the community, and the structuring and.preparation
of a department which can meetthose needs.
Fire Scene Commander - The Chief shall function as the commanding officer
at the fire scene.
Facilities and Equipment - The Chief is responsible for the custody, care, and
maintenance of the department facilities and equipment, and for projections
of future needs.
Budgeting - The Chief, in consultation with the City Administrator, is
responsible to annually prepare a recommended operating budget, and updated
five-year•capital and equipment needs budget.
Personnel - The Chief, in consultation with the City Administrator, will
administer personnel matters of the department, including the recruitment,
evaluation, selection of new members, the periodic evaluation of existing
members, and necessary disciplinary actions.
Training - The Chief is responsible for planning and executing a program of
training, so that members are fully prepared and competent.
Record Keeping - The Chief is responsible for insuring that proper records of
department activities are maintained and transferred in a timely manner to the
City Administrator and Council. Such records include, but are not limited to,
fire runs, fire losses, training, and equipment schedules.
- 2 -
Fire -Prevention - The Chief will work cooperatively with the Fire Marshal
to see that an adequate program of inspections, and other fire prevention
and preparation measures are carried out.
Member of City staff - The Chief is considered to be a member of the City
staff, with department head level status. As such, the Chief is entitled
to participate in City staff meetings, and will be expected to make him-
self reasonably available to consult with the City Administrator and other
staff members to provide a Fire department perspective on City issues.
Assistant Fire Chief Job Responsibilities
Serving as Chief - In the absence or disability of the Chief, the Assistant
ChieF shall perform all the functions and exercise.all of the authority of the
office of Chief.
Delegated Responsibilities - The Assistant Chief will provide general staff
support to the Chief, carrying out specific duties as requested. As determined
by the Chief, the Assistant Chief may be given primary responsibility for
specific duties, such as management of equipment, execution of the training
program, or record keeping.
Criteria for Selection
Applicants for both positions will be evaluated on the following criteria:
1. Knowledge of firefighting methods and procedures.
2. Knowledge of fire prevention methods and procedures.
3. Knowledge of firefighting equipment.
4. Leadership capabilities and potential -ability to define and
communicate to others the proper role of the Fire department
as it.relates to needs of.the community and the rest of the City
organization.
5. Personnel management and supervisory skills.
6. Administrative ability - budgeting, record keeping, development
of procedures.
7. Past and future commitment to the fire service, and to the
Mendota Heights Fire Department.
Applicant Requirements and Evaluation..
No minimum qualifications for applications are being established. However,
specific factors that will be considered in determining how well a candidate
meets the above selection criteria will include, but not be limited to:
- 3 -
1. Years of experience and number of runs with the Mendota Heights Fire
department.
2. Experience in the fire (or other emergency) service, other than.
Mendota Heights.
3. Coursework and/or training in the fire service.
4. Other education, training, and experience that relate to the above
criteria (for example, supervisory experience).
5. Personality characteristics and philosophies consistent. with the
needs of the department and the City (as perceived and rated by an
interview panel consisting of representatives of the City Council,
City Administration, Fire department, other City departments, and
others that may be included on the final interview panel).
Pay
Current rates of pay are: Chief - $312 per month.
Assistant Chief - $172 per month.
These rates are subject to review after appointment.
Method of Application
Applicants should submit a resume of qualifications to the City Administrator
no later than 4:30 P.M., Friday, March 2, 1984. The resume should include
at least the following:
1. Name.
2. Address.
3. Telephone number, both home and work.
4. Position applying for - Chief, Assistant Chief, or both.
5. Education, including highest level (grade) attained, as well as
certificates of.achievement, degrees, etc. Applicant should
particularly highlight any education felt to be directly relevant to
the position applied for.
6. Experience - abbreviated job history, highlighting particularly
relevant experience.
7. History of experience and service with the Mendota Heights Fire Dept.
8. Any other firefighting, or emergency services, experience.
9. Training in the fire service.
10. A statement of why the applicant is interested and feels he would make
- 4 -
a good Chief and/or Assistant Chief.
Applicants are welcome to provide any additional information felt to be
relevant.
Questions - Further questions should be addressed to City Administrator
Kevin Frazell, at 452-1850.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
February 3, 1984
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admip(istrator
-e .;.,,,.
'FROM:, James�,E. -0-a-h—l" •I�son'.
Publit Works Di-rector9
SUBJECT: Traffic Signals
Delaware Avenue
M.S.A. Project No. 140-020-02
Job No. 8309
Improvement No. 83, Project No. 3
INTRODUCTION:
4,
The City't share of the'Delaware Avenue traffic signal upgrad,ing that was
completed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation in 1983
be funded out of M.S.A. funds.
DISCUSSION:
I applied for reimbursement from the State for City costs on ihe subject -.-
project and Mn/DOT officials have stated that because this is' an "off
system" expenditure they need a resolution from the City requesting it.
RECOMMENDATION:
Council has already authorized this scheme of financing for the City's
participation in this state project, so staff recommends Council adopt
the attached resolution authorizing it.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Council pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 84- , Resolution Authorizing
Appropriation of Municipal State Aid Fund To State Project No. 1918-79
(M.S.A. Project No. 140-020-02)
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING -APPROPRIATION OF MUNICIPAL
STATE AID FUNDS TO STATE ,;,.PROJECT NO. 1918-79
(M.S.A.-PROJECT NO.=140-020'-02)_ �.-.
.�J�r �. _ �• .'L': -a �itr >.r.':�:• ,�` �e ��^ '^4. {.3. i 1',a
��» t^ _ ::.�.. :xier�:•••..u+a, r.1i - � .SiJ - 'fi - - t-,.i....:../'r ..•� ' _
t..iS4t+%+��i': y.. t.,v.ri�+,i.•STR.4.r.2 �-i �.. � �'�j% . i 4• TIJrr.. •4:a
^. fi''"a
y7;uxr. - _ �SY%D,"��-"r+..-ti;, �.�e...... " 4^ . - • - - r.'7�.?s ` -,
WHEREAS.' ft`h:aLLswbeen deem advi.sabl`e=-afi ces•sar.- for, the-City'"of Mendota
.>,.�_., YET
Heights to participate in'-the'co.st of a'c6nstrdction•project located on
C.S.A.H. No. 63 within the limits of said `municipality; and
WHEREAS, said construction project has been approved by the Department
of Highways and identified in its records as S.P. No. 1918-79.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the Cite of Mendota
Heights do hereby appropriate from our Municipal State Aid Street Funds
the sum of $6,184.69 dollars to apply toward the construction of said
project and request the Commi.ssioner.of Hi:ghways,to approve,this authoriza-
tion.
Adopted by, the' City Council"of `Heights�this Seventh`
day of February, 1984. ter,
C,IT-Y=-COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
February 2, 1984
C,1
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Ad ini,strator
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets
Feasibility Report
Evergreen Knolls (Gryc Subdivision)
Job No. 8313
Improvement No. 83, Project No. 4 k
INTRODUCTION:
Jim Gryc has preliminary plat approval back in November 1982, he delayed
the feasibility report until now for financial reasons.
HISTORY AND BACKGROUND:
When the preliminary plat was approved there was much discussion over the
City's desire to run Wachtler Avenue through from where it ends now at
Wentworth Avenue to Trail Road. Opposition was mainly voiced from existing
homes along the new alignment and Trail Road. The preliminary plat was
approved and the feasibility report studying public improvements to serve
the subdivision and the extension of Wachtler Avenue was ordered. Since
that time Larry Shaughnessy, Ray Young and LeRoy Hanson have also petitioned
the City to have Wachtler Avenue extended.
DISCUSSION:
Ed Kishel has now completed the feasibility report and it is attached. Staff
will be prepared to answer any questions or give an oral presentation if re-
quested by, Council Tuesday evening.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approving the feasibility study and setting the public
hearing for 7:45 o'clock P.M. on February 21, 1984.
NOTE: Law only requires public notices to be sent to properties proposed
to be assessed.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council wishes to implement Staff recommendation, Council should pass
a motion adopting Resolution No. 84- , Accepting Engineer's Report and
Calling for Hearing on Proposed Sanitary Sewer, Water, Storm Sewers and
Street Improvements to Serve Evergreen Knolls (Gryc Subdivision).
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
January 31, 1984
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Edward F. Kiabel
City Engineer
SUBJECT: Feasibility Report
Evergreen Knolls (Qryc)
Job No. 8312
Improvement No. 83, Project No. 4
The following constitutes u feasibility report for tbe|propoaeid'',
cooatructioo of sanitary sewers, storm sewers, watermaios, 'and streets
to serve Evergreen Knolls, a proposed subdivision to be locbted eust_of''
Wocbtler Avenue, between Wentworth Avenue and Bachelor Ave-
.� .
The development stretches from Dodd Road, -to Wacbtler Ar6nu4
tended with the topography generally sloping in that directo�� the need ueed for the development of Wucbtler Avenue as an ioiti6l P�rt��f=-p�^`/�����?
the project.
pro'ect.
The Developer has expressed an interest in minimizing the initial
construction, thus Staff has studied two schemes, each with more than
one phase of construction, as shown on the attached drawings.
SCHEME "A" - Preferred , divides the project into two
phases, one of which considers the construction of Wacbtler Avenue and
u portion of Evergreen Knoll to allow for the sale and early develop-
ment of about' 30 lots, while the other considers the future development
of the balance of Evergreen Knoll as far as Dodd Road, consisting,of
about 23 lots.
The early construction of Wachtler Avenue permits the installation
of a watermaio loop, easy traffic access to the development site and
the potential development of adjacent properties not a part of Ever-
green Knolls. This may generate additional traffic on Trail road,
south of Bachelor Avenue, but the construction of Wacbtler Avenue has
always been a port of the City's Transportation Plan and was contem-
plated sooner or later.
The existing intersection of 0acbtler and Wentworth belongs to the
County and making a connection to that intersection will require co-
operation from the County Highway Department. The County Highway
Department has indicated that there are no funds budgeted for that type
of work this year so that a connection at that intersection, at this
time, may have to he made on a temporary basis until the County can see
fit to improve a rather dangerous situation. If a project is ordered,
the City should request County participation to determine if they might
find some source of revenue to complete their share along with a City
project or at a definite later date.
1
.,
The development of Wachtler Avenue will require the acquistion of
street right of way and slope easements. There is a possibility that
condemnation may be required in some cases. Some drainage easements
will also be required.
Phase II of Scheme "A" assumes the future construction of the
eastern portion of Evergreen Knolls, together with its accompanying
utilities. As shown on Sheet 1 of 4 of_the attached drawings, this
portion of the project can be constructed at any time after Phase I has
been started or completed.
The following constitutes estimated costs for the construction of
Scheme "A", including contract construction, fees, overheadiand contin-
gencies.
PHASE I
Sanitary Sewers $ 91,800.00 J
Watermains 94,500.00
-Storm Sewers 63,045.00
Streets 191,700.00
Estimated Total: $441,045.00 ,
PHASE II
Sanitary Sewers $ 75,600.00
Watermains 70,200.00
Storm Sewers 54,000.00
Streets 91,800.00
Estimated Total: $291,600.00
Estimated Grand Total Project Cost: $732,645.00
As of this writing, it is difficult to arrive at precise estimated
assessable costs, however, to determine some guidelines, it is esti-
mated that there are approximately 6,550 lineal feet of assessable
frontage on the entire project for a unit cost of $110.00 per assess-
able foot. This means that the assessment for a standard 100 foot lot
will be about $11,000.00. It may be that the Developer may will want
to have each lot in the platted area assessed at a uniform lump sum
amount, with Staff determining a "per front foot" assessment rate for
unplatted areas. Sewers and watermains are assessed over a 19 year
period, while streets are assessed over a 10 year period. The interest
rate on the unpaid balance will be about one percent (1%) over the rate
the City pays for borrowed money. This assessment rate is estimated to
be eleven percent (11%) at this time.
SCHEME "B" proposes development of the project in two phases
similar to Scheme "A", but limits the construction of Wachtler Avenue
to from Bachelor Avenue to Evergreen Knoll. This is done to minimize
the initial project cost and to allow the County to budget funds for
4
the reconstruction of the Wachtler-Wentworth intersection which is
estimated to cost about $30,000.00: Working .with the County will then
take place when Phase II is started.
Disadvantages to utilizing Scheme "B" are as follows:
1. Limited access for emergency vehicles.
- --2. Potential increase of traffic on Bachelor Avenue and Trail
Road until Wachtler Avenue is extended to Wentworth.
3. .=Potential deferrment of storm sewer oversizing assessments.
.. ... �.. M s'�.'""F"=': _.r.. r - .... _ .-. -. _. - a.. ...'�'a 4�b'c� �, a�'`'�7'_ma�.c_�sa= rzr;;,'2=Vis'.`-�:i.. - r; _.. •�r
4. Possibility of fewer bidders and higher bids on a'scaled down
5. The possible need to rough grade a portion of Wachtler Avenue
North of Evergreen Knoll so as to install storm sewers designed to
serve Evergreen Knoll.
6. The delay in constructing Wachtler Avenue north of Evergreen
Knoll, .with its ultimate need for considerable fill material, 'could:,;..' -
disrupt the balance of cut and fill in the ultimate development'of'.1`'_
Wachtler.
=7. Because preliminary construction of a portion of Wachtler
Avenue north of Evergreen Knoll will be needed as part of Phase I
construction, necessary right of -way, slope easements, and storm sewer
construction costs will have to be'deferred until Phase II,construction -.4.
is completed.
8. The inability of property owners adjacent to Wachtler Avenue
north Qf.Evergreen Knoll to develoa their properties as soon as is
possible under Scheme "A"�
For construction purposes, the following constitutes estimated
assessable costs for Scheme "B", including contract construction, fees,
overhead, and contingencies.
PHASE I
Sanitary Sewers $ 70,200.00
Watermains 70,200.00
Storm Sewers 63,450.00
Streets 122,850.00
Estimated Total: $326,700.00
3
PHASE II
Sanitary Sewers $ 97,200.00
Watermains 93,150.00
Storm Sewers 44,550.00
Streets 160.650.00
Estimated Total: $395,550.00
Estimated Grand Total Project Cost: $772,250.00
A"ssuming 6; 550 feet • of assessable•-Ir-on_.tage•;' for-Y'Sctieme l -B': he
assessable cost is estimated to be $118.00 per assessable foot.
The unit assessable cost for both Scheme "A" and Scheme "B" may be
slightly reduced should the County participate in the reconstruction of
the Wachtler—Wentworth intersection and should the City participate in
some nominal oversize costs for watermain and storm sewer installation.
Staff recommends that the project be constructed as indicated in.,
Scheme_,"A" and finds that the project is reasonable, -.is feasible; _and, `,-. e+V~
is ;recommended for construction.' Staff requests that, the, Council='-�'f-.;.
approve of this report and establishes a public hearing on tfie mattes;.=_:' :r
at' its earliest convenience, preferably the _February. 21-1984 meetings:`"�V.
4
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT
AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED SANITARY
SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER, AND STREET IMPROVE-
MENTS TO SERVE EVERGREEN KNOLLS (GRYC SUBDIVISION)
(IMPROVEMENT NO. 83, PROJECT NO. 4)
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has submitted his report to the City Council
with respect to the proposed construction of the following improvements
to serve Evergreen Knolls (Gryc Subdivision) and adjacent areas, to-
-wit: i
_ ;The construction of an extension to the City's sanitary sewer
system, including appurtenances and incidentals thereto. and the
acquisition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary
of streets and easements in the areas hereinafter more particularly
described.
The construction of a storm sewer system including appurtenances
and incidentals thereto and the acquisition of easements, in and for
'the area hereinafter more particularly described.
The construction of an extension to the City's water distribution
system including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acqui-
sition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets
And easements in the area hereinafter more particularly described.
The construction -of street improvements consisting of the acquisi-
tion of easements and the grading, stabilization, drainage and bitumi-
nous surfacing, and the construction of concrete curbs'and gutters on
the streets to be situated in the area hereinafter more.particularly
described.
WHEREAS, the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is
situated within the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minne-
sota, and is more particularly described as follows:
Land abutting the East line of Section 23, Township 28 North,
Range 23 West and South of Wentworth Avenue (CR 8) and North
of Bachelor Avenue together with the West 211.74 feet of the
East 566.85 feet of Lot 36, and the West 1 acre of Lot 36, and
the East 1 acre of the West 2 acres of Lot 36, together with
Lots 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 of Auditors Subdivsion No. 3, Section 24,
Township 28 North, Range 23 West.
WHEREAS, in said report said City Engineer reported that the proposed
improvements and construction thereof were feasible and desirable and
further reported on the proposed costs of said improvements.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows:
1. That the report of said City Engineer be and is hereby re-
ceived.
2. That a public hearing on said improvements be held on Tuesday,
February 21, 1984 at 7:45 o'clock P.M. at the Mendota Heights
City Hall 750 South Plaza Drive in the City of Mendota Heights.
3. That the City Clerk, with the aid and assistance of the City
Attorney, be and is hereby authorized and directed�to prepare a notice
of said hearing and to cause said notice to be published and mailed to
the owners of the property situated within said area, all in accordance
with applicable Minnesota Statutes.
Adopted"by'the City -Council of^the City of Mendota Heights this Seventh
day of February, 1984.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEI HTS
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
By
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
February 1, 1984
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Trunk Highway 110 Traffic Signal System
INTRODUCTION:
The Minnesota Department of Transportation has requested City and County
participation for further upgrading of signal lights along Trunk Highway 110.
I&I&ITI MMIral11C
Mn/DOT in connection with installing a new signal light for the I -35E
West ramp, proposes to modify all the existing signals along Trunk Highway
110. They would like to install a master controller at the intersection of
Trunk Highway 110 and Trunk Highway 149 that would coordinate the traffic
on T.H. 110 so that if a vehicle hits one green light it would then have an
excellent probability of hitting all green lights. Funding for the master
controller and traffic coordination work would be 50 percent by Mn/DOT and
50 percent by Dakota County. Dakota County would then pass 50 percent of
their share to the communities involved. (State and County letters are
attached).
Another modification would be to install OPTICOM at Lexington Avenue
and at I -35E East ramp as requested by the City. This work has been budgeted
for by the fire and police departments and would be paid for out of Equipment
Certificates.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve of the City participation and authorize payment.
Suggest— OPTICOM at $13,000.00 via Equipment Certificates
Master Controller at $3,736.00 via M.S.A.
2. Disapprove of City participation and thus eliminate OPTICOM
and jeopardize the master controller project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City participation in this project.
ACTION REQUIRED:
No formal action is required at this time, however staff requests
that Council pass a motion authorizing Staff to advise the County and
State agencies of the City's intention to participate.
M'UD(�sota
De,patlnle|lt (A/ '['[a|lsp(}-tal'()|l
District 9
348s Ha({|e\/ A\/c|lL]e Not -Ill, 13()}{ 205()
North St. F"aQ|, Minnesota 551()9
January lO, I984
Mr. Jim Danielson
Public Amrbo Director
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120
Dear Mr. Danielson:
SUBJECT: S.P. 1918-86 & I982 -I03
T.H. 110 Interconnection
CITY OF KX2MO�MT8 "EM=
���|M��p.������
=.=``^�"U.°��, ..
|4N1 � 1984
We have a project scheduled for letting in April 1984 that will install
a new traffic signal system at I -35E West Ramp and T.H. llO, revise the
existing traffic signal system at Z -35C East Ramps, provide hardwire inter-
connection on T.H. llD from County Road 4](Lexiogtou Ave'), through I -35O
East and West Ramps, through T.H. 149 and to CS&8 63(Dalawmre Ave').
Emergency vehicle pre-emption will he installed at the T.H. llO at Lexington
Avenue and I -35O East Ramps systems.
We propose that the cost of the traffic signal work be shared as shown .
the attached sheet. The emergency vehicle pre-emption costs will be
assumed by the City of Mendota Heights. The construction costs of the
signal system installation at Z -35C West Ramps, the revision of the I -35E
East Ramps system will have Federal Funds and the non -Federal participated
portion will be assumed by the State' The interconnection costs will be
shared between the State and Dakota County based upon the legs each agency
has compared to the total number of legs in the coordinated system. The
F8WA will participate in the master controller cost and the remaining
portion will be shared between the State and Dakota County as part of the
interconnect cost.
The maintenance of the existing signal systems will remain unchanged from
the present. The Sbzba will provide all maintenance for the new signal
system at I -35C West Ramp at T.H. 110 and for the master controller and
interconnection system. The City of Mendota Heights will be responsible
for all emergency vehicle pre-emption system maintenance costo.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact either Mr. Curtis L.
Gobell or Mr. Bruce 0astmar.
Si cerely,
��:gKermit * K. McRae, 4P..
District Engineer
x^arw/On^",oviij'Employer
Intersection
(1) 135E West Ramp at TH 110
(2) 135E East Ramps at TH 110
(3) TH 110 at Lexington Ave.
(4) 135E East Ramps at TH 110
(5) TH 110 from Lexington Ave.
to I -35E West Ramp and
I -35E East Ramps to
Delaware Ave.
(6) TH 110 at TH 149
SIGNAL SYSTEM
COST PARTICIPATION
City of
Total
Dakota
Mendota
„- '
Est.
FHWA
State
County
Heights
Type'of,Work
Cost
Share
Share
Share
Share
New 4•Signal System
$40,000
90%-$36,000
10%-$4,000
0
0
Sigrral:System Revision
$25,000
90%-$22,500
10%-$2,500
0
0
Eme+r"g�eicy,;Vbhicle
$ 7,000
0
0
0
$7,000
Pre=etnpti.on
Emerge-nc"Vehicle
g, y ��,
$ 6, 000
0
0
0
$6,000
Pre;;�empt1,on
Hardwi"re`;-Inter-
$40,000
0
80%-$32,000
20%-$8,000
0
connection
Master Coordination
$25,000
36%-$9,000
51.2%-$12,800
12.8%-$3,200
0
Cabinet and Equipment
ROBERT P. SANDEEN, P.C.
COUNTY ENGINEER
1P.4 K 0 Tit C 0 U TELEPHONE
A'T V 612-437.0396
-DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1560 HWY. 55 -HASTINGS. MINNESOTA 55033 , ._Zy(9
January 26, 1984
Mr. Orvil J. Johnson,
City Administrator
750 South Plaza Drive: -
Mendota H e i g h t s MN 55120 ;n:
Re: S.P. 1918-86 in* d"'] 982-103
T.*H.- 110-Traffic'Signal .System
Dear Mr. Johnson:
JAN 3 0 1984 .
Mn/DOT has scheduled the referenced project for letting in April, 1984. The
project consists of a new traffic signal at 1-35E and T.H. 110, interconnec-
tion of the signals on T.H. 110 from C.R. 43 (Lexington Avenue) to C.S.A.H.
63 (Delaware Avenue), and emergency vehicle pre-emption at a couple of the
signal systems. A portion of the interconnection and master -controller costs
are to be shared with the local units of government.
Dakota County policy regarding funding of traffic signals allows the County
to pick up one-half of the remaining cost after subtracting any federal and
state shares. The cities of Mendota Heights and West St. Paul will be re-
quested to fund the remaining amount of this project. Following is a break-
down of the participation costs to the local units of government:
1. Interconnect to CR 43 (Lexington Avenue)
Estimated local share = $4,000
Dakota County share = 50% ($2,000)
Mendota Heights share = 500 ($2,000)
2. Interconnect to CSAH 63 (Delaware Avenue)
Estimated local share = $4,000
Dakota County share = 66% ($2,640)
Mendota Heights share = 179 ($680)
West St. Paul share = 17% ($680)
3. Master Controller
Estimated local share - $3,200
Dakota County share = 59% ($1,888)
Mendota Heights share = 33% ($1,056)
West St. Paul share = 8% ($256)
t
Mn/DOT has scheduled the referenced project for letting in April, 1984. The
project consists of a new traffic signal at 1-35E and T.H. 110, interconnec-
tion of the signals on T.H. 110 from C.R. 43 (Lexington Avenue) to C.S.A.H.
63 (Delaware Avenue), and emergency vehicle pre-emption at a couple of the
signal systems. A portion of the interconnection and master -controller costs
are to be shared with the local units of government.
Dakota County policy regarding funding of traffic signals allows the County
to pick up one-half of the remaining cost after subtracting any federal and
state shares. The cities of Mendota Heights and West St. Paul will be re-
quested to fund the remaining amount of this project. Following is a break-
down of the participation costs to the local units of government:
1. Interconnect to CR 43 (Lexington Avenue)
Estimated local share = $4,000
Dakota County share = 50% ($2,000)
Mendota Heights share = 500 ($2,000)
2. Interconnect to CSAH 63 (Delaware Avenue)
Estimated local share = $4,000
Dakota County share = 66% ($2,640)
Mendota Heights share = 179 ($680)
West St. Paul share = 17% ($680)
3. Master Controller
Estimated local share - $3,200
Dakota County share = 59% ($1,888)
Mendota Heights share = 33% ($1,056)
West St. Paul share = 8% ($256)
-2 -
It is our understanding that the City of Mendota Heights has requested the emer-
gency vehicle pre-emption for City use and will be responsible for the construc-
tion and maintenance cost accordingly. The remaining maintenance responsibili-:
ties will be unchanged from previous agreements.
By copy of this letter, I am requesting that Mn/DOT prepare a four -party partici-
pation and maintenance agreement (Mn/DOT, Dakota County, Mendota Heights, and
West St. Paul) outlining the terms indicated above.
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Peter L. Sorenson
Traffic Engineer
PLS/bv
c- Curtis Gobeli, Mn/DOT District 9
4q4NES0,,
minnesota
Departn-wnt ot"Fransportation
District 9
stirOir T;op 3485 Hadlcv Avenue North, BOX 2050
North St, haul, Minnesota 55109
Telephone 779-1174
January 20, 1984
Mr. James Danielson
Mendota Heights Director of Public Works
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120
Dear Mr. Danielson:
SUBJECT: S.P. 1985-76 (1494)
T.H. 149 INTERCHANGE IN MENDOTA HEIGHTS
The following is in response to the concerns contained in your
letter of January 10, 1984, regarding the above referenced
project.
Item 1 - Pond at Mendota Heights Road and T.H. 149
Filling a small portion of the pond (.3 acres) is necessary
because of the widening of T.H. 149. The proposed drainage
design considered this factor. 1.2 acres of drainage have
been diverted away from the pond, therefore, no increase
in water level of the pond is anticipated.
Item 2 - Oak Tree Removal Adjacent To The Pond At T.H. 149
This area will be landscaped in a future project.
Attention will be given to replacing the oak trees in
the same vicinity of the lost trees consistent with
traffic safety considerations. The City will be
consulted during the development of the landscaping
plan. I
Item 3 - Visitation Drive and the Condon - Cul-de-sac
Upon completion of construction, the public portion of
these streets will be conveyed to the City as provided
in the Cooperative Agreement (you now have the Agreement).
Hopefully the above information responds to your concerns. If you
have any further questions, please advise.
S nee ely, CITY OF MENDOTA HIE'CHTS
ENGIONEERM'N"J" D'EPT.
S nee el
•
y,
E. Sandahl JAN2 5' 1984
j I
JAsistant District Engineer
a
sign and Right of Way
t�-k ( .- , r
_'7,eq An Equal Qppartuni�j- Entpinyer
C= AJ t, A
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIG.,HTS
MEMO
February 1, 1984
TO: Mayor, City Council and City inistrator
FROM: Edward F. Kishel
City Engineer
SUBJECT: Cooperative Construction Agreement No. 61825
Mn/DOT - Mendota Heights
Mendota Heights Road - Trunk Highway 149 Construction
Job No. 8317A & 8317B
Improvement Nos. 83-7A & 83-7B
INTRODUCTION:
The following concerns itself with a cooperative construction agreement
between Mn/DOT and the City of Mendota Heights for payment of the City's
share of Mn/DOT construction costs along Trunk Highway 149 and Mendota
Heights Road east of Dodd Road.
BACKGROUND:
During the construction of T.H: 494, Mn/DOT will eliminate Blue Gentian
Road east of Dodd Road. To provide a frontage road to replace Blue Gen-
tian Road, Mn/DOT is constructing approximately 2600 feet of Mendota
Heights Road to serve landlocked residents east of Trunk Highway 149.
Mn/DOT will also upgrade T.H. 149 north of Mendota Heights Road,. -almost
to Lake Drive.
Dorking with Mn/DOT, City Staff arranged to have Mn/DOT construct a standard
44 foot 9 ton roadway on Mendota Heights Road, in lieu of the originally
planned 30 foot*street. A trunk line water main and a bituminous sidewalk
are also included in the project with the City paying its proportionate
share of the cost of widening Mendota Heights Road and installing a bitu-
minous sidewalk, as well as installing the watermain.
DISCUSSION:
To do the above, will require a cooperative agreement spelling out the con-
ditions, including financing. Mn/DOT has submitted three (3) copies of
Agreement No. 61825 with the request that they be approved by the Council
and that the signed agreements and three (3) copies of the Council resolu-
tion be returned to Mn/DOT as soon as possible. Bids for the above work
will be received on February 24, 1984. Mn/DOT cannot award a contract
without receiving City approval of the Agreement. In addition to construo
tion items indicated above, the Agreement also formally dedicates the owner-
ship of Visitation Drive (a new entrance to the Visitation School complex)
and Condon cul-de-sac (frontage road) to the City.
In addition to adopting the agreement, it is necessary for the City to
advance funds to Mn/DOT in an amount equal to the estimated City's share
of the costs, based on the low bidders proposal, to be determined shortly
after bids have been received. Estimated City costs, at this time are,,
Streets - $41,888.70, Watermains - $229,339.69.
Larry Shaughnessy concurred that the City can handle the financing by
requesting State Aid funds for the street work and by using Water.Revenue
funds for the watermain extensions. Final costs will be based on actual
work completed.
RECOMMENDATION:
Because the City stands to gain considerably by having Mn/DOT construct
Mendota Heights Road to State Aid Standards and to install a trunk water
extension as part of their contract, staff recommends that the Council
approve of the Agreement and adopt the attached resolution for submission.
to Mn/DOT.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Council approve Agreement No. 61825, adopt attached resolution which authorizes
the Mayor and Clerk to endorse the agreement.
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING STATE OF MINNESOTA,
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT
NO. 61825
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Mendota Heights enter into Agreement
No. 81825 with the State of Minnesota, Department of Minnesota for the
following purposes; to -wit: to provide for payment by the City to the
Sate of the City's share of the costs of the water main facilities con-
struction to be performed upon and along Trunk Highway No. 149 (Dodd
Road) and Mendota Heights Road and of the extra width bituminous surfacing
construction and bituminous walk constructionto be performed upon, alona
and adjacent to Mendota Heights Road from Engineer Station 108+66 to r
Engineer Station 140+41.323 within the corporate City Limits under State
Project No. 1985-76 (T.H. 494=393); and to provide for the release and
conveyance to the City of the entire portion of Mendota Heights Road,
Condon Cul-de-sac, Visitation Drive and Entrances No. 5, No. 6, No. 7,
No. 8, and No. 9 constructed under said state project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City Officers are hereby authorized
and directed to execute such agreement.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this Seventh
day of February, 1984.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Robert G. -Lockwood, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
�NNESpr
�o� � �tio Mlllll(.'sOra
Q Uc�partmellr Ot f`►"allsi)Ot"tatl<)Il
o�
District 9
OF TReQ3485 11ad1cv /',% ('11LW N01"111. BOX 2050
North 5t. Paul, Minnesota 551(9
Telephone
January 13, 1984
Mr. Orvil J. Johnson
Administrator
Mendota Heights
750 South Plaza
Mendota Heights,
City Hall
Drive
Minnesota 55120
Dear Mr. Johnson:
779-1178
SUBJECT: S.P. 1985-76 (T.H. 494=393)
COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT NO. 61825
THE NE QUADRANT OF T.H. 494/T.H. 149 INTERSECTION
IN MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Transmitted herewith in triplicate is a proposed form of
agreement with the City of Mendota Heights. This agreement
provides for payment by the City to the State of the City's
share of the costs of the water main facilities construction
to be performed upon and along Trunk Highway No. 149 (Dodd Road)
and Mendota Heights Road and of the extra width bituminous
surfacing construction and bituminous walk construction to be
performed upon, along and adjacent to Mendota Heights Road from
Engineer Station 108+66 to Engineer Station 140+41.323 within
the corporate City limits under State Project No. 1985-76
(T.H. 494=393); and to provide for the release and conveyance
to the City of the entire portions of Mendota Heights Road,
Condon Cul-de-sac, Visitation Drive and Entrances No. 5,No. 6,
No. 7, No. 8 and No. 9 constructed under said state project.
The estimated total City cost share of the aforesaid construction
is based on estimated unit prices as shown in the preliminary cost
estimate marked SCHEDULE "I", attached to the agreement and made a
part thereof. In accordance with the provisions of Article III,
Section A. of the agreement, the State shall, when the construction
contract is awarded for the above referenced state project, prepare
a revised SCHEDULE "I" based on the construction contract unit
prices and submit a copy thereof to the City; and the City agrees
to advance to the Commissioner of Transportation an amount equal
to the City's total cost share as set forth in said revised
SCHEDULE "I" forthwith upon the execution of the agreement and upon
receipt of a request from the State for such advancement of funds.
An l:iluol Opporronirr l:inployer
Mr. Orvil J. Johnson
January 13, 1984
Page Two
If this agreement meets with your approval, kindly present it to the
City Council for their approval and execution which includes original
signatures of the City Council authorized City officers and the affixing
of the City Seal on all three copies of the agreement. When all three
copies of the agreement have been executed by the City, please return
them to this office with three certified copies of a new resolution
(the original and two copies bearing original signatures) passed by
the City Council authorizing its officers to sign the agreement on its
behalf. A suggested form of such resolution is also enclosed.
It is requested that the executed agreement and resolution copies be
forwarded to this office as soon as possible in order that the letting
of a construction contract may not be delayed. Please advise us if
there is any delay in the execution of the agreement. A copy will be
returned to the City when fully executed.
Si.,'L-ere Lv.
o64
Ker it K. McRae, P.E.
is rict Engineer
losures
M
DESIGN STATE OF MINNESOTA AGREEMENT NO.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION
AGREEMENT 61825
S.P. 1985-76 (T.H. 494=393)
Fed. Proj. I 494-4(170)
Agreement
between
AMOUNT ENCUMBERED
The State
of Minnesota
Department
of Transportation,
and
(None)
The City
of Mendota Heights
Re: City
cost water main and
frontage
ESTIMATED AMOUNT
road
construction by the
State in
RECEIVABLE
the
NE quadrant of T.H.
494-T.H.
149
intersection in Mendota Heights
$271,228.52
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the State of Minne-
sota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the
"State" and the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, acting by and
through its City Council, hereinafter referred to as the "City".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS the State is about to award a contract for the construction
of grading, bituminous surfacing, Bridge No. 19857, water main
facilities, frontage roads and fencing and other associated construc-
tion work items to be performed upon and along Trunk Highway No. 55
from Engineer Station 162+34.63 (approximately 500 feet west of the
61825 0
north junction of Trunk Highway No. 149) to Engineer Station 185+23.85
(the junction of County State Aid Highway No. 26 or Lone Oak Road)
in the City of Eagan, Minnesota, upon and along Trunk Highway No.
149 (Dodd Road) from Engineer Station 14+26 (the north junction of
Trunk Highway No. 55) to Engineer Station -4-0+60.11 '(approximately
1,250 feet south of the Trunk Highway No. 494 eastbound roadway) in
the City of Eagan, Minnesota, and upon, along and adjacent to Trunk
Highway No. 494 from Engineer Station 190+00 (the proposed junction
of Trunk Highway No. 35E) to Engineer Station 252+00 (approximately
0.5 of a mile east of the junction of Trunk Highway No. 149) in the
City in accordance with State plans, -specifications and special
provisions therefor designated as State Projects No. 19,09-61 (T.H.
55=1), No. 1917-24 (T.H. 149=1), No. 1985-76 .(T.H. 494=3,93) and No.
1985-78 (T.H. 494=393} and 'in the records of the Federal Highway
Administration as Minnesota Project 1494-4(170); and
WHEREAS the Mendota Heights Road construction to be performed along
and adjacent to Trunk Highway No,. 494within the corporate City
limits under State Project No. 1985-76 (T.H. 494=393) includes
features, such as extra width bituminous surfacing, a bituminous
walk and storm sewer facilities, beyond those necessary for an inter-
state trunk highway frontage roads; and
WHEREAS State Project No. 1985-76 (T.H. 494=393) also includes the
MC
61825
construction of certain City owned water main facilities to be per-
formed upon and along Trunk Highway No. 149 (Dodd Road) and Mendota
Heights Road within the corporate City limits; and
WHEREAS the City has expressed its willingness to participate in the
costs of said Mendota Heights Road and water main facilities construc-
tion as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS the construction of a portion of a Trunk Highway No. 494
frontage road (West Blue Gentian Road) to be performed under State
Projects No. 1917-24 (T.H. 149=1) and No. 1985-76 (T.H. 494=393)
will be covered under Cooperative Construction Agreement No. 61824
between the State and the City of Eagan, Minnesota.
IT IS, THEREFORE, MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
ARTICLE I - CONSTRUCTION BY THE STATE
The State shall, in connection with the award of the construction
construction, administration of said contract and the performance of
construction engineering for State Projects No. 1909-61 (T.H. 55=1),
No. 1917-24 (T.H. 149=1), No. 1985-76 (T.H. 494=393) and No. 1985-
78 (T.H. 494=393), do and perform the following:
(Item 1.) Duly advertise for bids and.award a contract to the lowest
-3-
61825
responsible bidder for the Trunk Highways No. 55, No. 149 and No.
494 construction of grading, bituminous surfacing, Bridge No. 19857,
water main facilities, frontage roads and fencing and other associated
construction work items in accordance with State plans, specifications
and special provisions bearing the above state project number designa-
tion and which are on file in the office of the Commissioner of Trans-
portation, and are made a part hereof by reference with the same
force and effect as though fully set forth herein; and
(Item 2.) Direct and supervise all construction activities performed
under said state projects, and perform all construction engineering
and inspection functions necessary for the satisfactory completion of
said state projects construction; and
(Item 3.) Make such changes in plans or in the character of the work
for said state projects construction, including the city cost parti-
cipation construction hereunder, which are reasonably necessary to
cause said state projects construction to be in all things performed
and completed in a satisfactory manner, and to that end and as supple-
mental to any contract let for the construction of said state projects,
to enter into any change orders or supplemental agreements with the
State's contractor for the performance of any extra work or work
occasioned by any necessary, advantageous or desirable changes in
plans. However, the District Engineer of the Minnesota Department
-4-
61 825
of Transportation at Oakdale or his duly authorized representative
will inform the City's Engineer or other appropriate City official
of any proposed change order or supplement to the construction con-
tract which will affect the city cost participation hereunder; and
(Item 4.) Do and perform all other acts and functions necessary to
cause said state projects to be completed in a satisfactory manner.
ARTICLE II - BASIS OF PAYMENT BY THE CITY
Section A. Construction Costs
The City shall pay to the State, as the City's full share of the costs
of the construction to be performed upon and along Trunk Highway No.
149 (Dodd Road) and Mendota Heights Road within the corporate City
limits under State Project No. 1985-76 (T.H. 494=393) in accordance
with Article I hereof, the costs of the construction described below
under "CITY COST PARTICIPATION CONSTRUCTION" and of the costs of any
contract change orders or supplemental agreements which may be neces-
sary to complete the said city cost participation construction and
the cost of any settlements of claims made with the State's contractor
in connection with said city cost participation construction.
Said payment by the City hereunder of the City's share of construction
costs shall be based on the final quantities of city cost participation
construction work items performed or the final payment quantity in the
case of plan quantity items multiplied by the appropriate unit prices
-5-
61825
contained in the construction contract to be awarded by the State in
accordance with Article I hereof and/or multiplied by the appropriate
unit prices contained in any supplemental agreements to the State's
contract which provide for city cost participation construction.
Attached hereto, made a part hereof by reference and marked SCHEDULE
"I", is a preliminary construction cost estimate form which lists all
of the anticipated city cost participation construction and construc-
tion engineering items to be performed hereunder.
It is hereby understood and agreed that any and all liquidated damages
assessed the State's contractor in connection with the work performed
under the said state contract shall result in a credit shared by the
State and the City in the same proportion as their total share of
construction contract work is to the total contract cost without any
deduction for liquidated damages.:
CITY COST PARTICIPATION CONSTRUCTION
======== ----------------------------
,100 PERCENT shall be the City's rate of cost participation in all of
the following construction to be performed within the corporate City
limits under State Project No. 1985-76 (T.H. 494=393).
(1) Except as noted below, all of the bituminous surfacing construc-
tion to be performed upon those portions of the Mendota Heights Road
roadway which are north of and adjacent to those portions of said
61 825
roadway which are 30 feet in width and contiguous to the face of the
concrete curb and gutter to be constructed along the southerly side
of said roadway from Engineer Station 108+66 to Engineer Station
109+16.85, from Engineer Station 109+40.85 to Engineer Station 114+
11.93 and from Engineer Station 115+16.18 to Engineer Station 140+
41.323.
EXCEPTION: All of the bituminous surfacing construction to be per-
formed upon and within the approach areas of intersecting City
streets shall be excluded from any and all city cost participation.
(2) All of the storm sewer pipe construction located under and within
the limits of the city cost bituminous surfacing construction to be
performed upon and along Mendota Heights Road as described above in
paragraph (1). Said storm sewer pipe includes, but is not limited
to, certain portions of that storm sewer pipe which cross the Men-
dota Heights Road roadway centerline at Engineer Stations 117+08.61,
126+55, 133+00 and 138+02.16.
(3) All of the bituminous walk construction and the aggregate base
therefor to be performed along and adjacent to the south side of
Mendota Heights Road from Trunk Highway No. 149 (Dodd Road) to Engi-
neer Station 140+41.323.
(4) All of the water main facilities construction to be performed
upon and along Trunk Highway No. 149 (Dodd Road) and Mendota Heights
e
-7-
61825
Road. Said water main facilities construction includes the associated
clearing and grubbing to be performed left of the Trunk Highway No.
149 roadway at Engineer Stations N.B. 77+90 and N.B. 78+10.
Section B. Prorated Construction Costs
In addition, said payment by the City shall also include the City's
prorated shares of the contract costs of Items No. 2021.501 "Mobili-
zation", No. 2031.501 "Field Office", No. 2031.503 "Field Laboratory",
No. 2051.501 "Maintenance and Restoration of Haul Roads" and No.
563.601 "Traffic Control" as set forth in said attached SCHEDULE "I".
The aforesaid items are not included in the above described city cost
participation construction work item costs. Said additional payment
represents the City's proportionate shares of the mobilization,
field office, field laboratory, maintenance and restoration of haul
roads and traffic control costs incurred in connection with the
aforesaid city cost participation construction.
Section C. Construction Engineering Costs
In addition to payment of the aforesaid construction costs including
the prorated cost shares of "Mobilization", "Field Office", "Field
Laboratory", "Maintenance and Restoration of Haul Roads" and "Traffic
Control", the City shall pay to the State a prorated share of the
construction engineering costs for field engineering and inspection,
preparation of progress and final estimates reports, record sampling,
am
61825
and materials testing and inspection which will be incurred by the
State in connection with said city cost participation construction.
Such construction engineering costs shall consist of charges made by
Minnesota Department of Transportation personnel assigned to said
state projects and of a classification no higher than "Principal Engi-
neer" (Resident Engineers assigned to the Transportation Department
District Offices and placed in charge of construction projects are
classified as Principal Engineers) as recorded under the State con-
struction cost accounting work item code numbers appropriate for such
construction engineering activities on the "Time Report" (Form TP -30)
and the "Requisition and Distribution Sheet" (Form 1702). Said City
prorated cost share shall be determined using the method and formula
set forth in said attached SCHEDULE "I".
(Note: For the purposes of estimating the City's share of said con-
struction engineering costs as shown in the attached SCHEDULE "I"
construction cost estimate form, the State has used an amount equal
to 8 percent of the estimated amount computed as the City's total
share of the aforementioned construction costs which includes the
City's cost shares of the items of "Mobilization", "Field Office",
"Field Laboratory", "Maintenance and Restoration of Haul Roads" and
"Traffic Control".)
ARTICLE III - PAYMENT BY THE CITY
Section A. Estimate and Advancement of the City's Cost Share
It is estimated, for accounting purposes, that the payment by the
Mm
61825
City of its share of the costs of construction work to be performed
by the State hereunder which includes the City's share of the pro-
rated items "Mobilization", "Field Office", "Field Laboratory", "Main-
tenance and Restoration of Haul Roads" and "Traffic Control" plus the
8 percent construction engineering cost share (used for estimating
purposes only) is the sum of $271,228.52 as shown in the attached
SCHEDULE "I". The State shall, when a,construction contract is
awarded which includes the city cost participation construction work
to be performed hereunder, prepare a revised SCHEDULE "I" based on
the construction contract unit prices and submit a copy of said re-
vised SCHEDULE "I" to the City. The City agrees to advance -to the
Commissioner of Transportation an amount equal to the City's total
cost share as set forth in said revised SCHEDULE "I" be it more or
less than said sum of $271,228.52 forthwith upon the execution of
this agreement and upon receipt of a request from the State for such
advancement of funds.
Section B. Final Payment by the City
It is contemplated that all of the construction work to be performed
under said state construction contract is to be done on a unit price
basis. Upon the completion and acceptance of the work provided for
in said contract by the State and the preparation by the State of a
final estimate computing and determining the amount due the contractor
performing the work, the Commissioner of Transportation shall determine
-10-
f
61825
and compute the amount due the Trunk Highway Fund of the State of
Minfiesota from the City for the said city cost participation construc-
tion work as set forth hereunder. After the Commissioner of Trans-
portation determines the actual amount due from the City, he shall
apply on the payment thereof as much as may be necessary of the afore-
said funds advanced by the City. If the amount found due from the
City shall be less than the amount of the funds advanced, then, and
in that event, the balance of said advanced funds shall be returned
to the City without interest. If the amount found due from the City
shall exceed said amount of funds advanced, the City agrees to
promptly pay to the State the difference between said amount'found
due and said amount of funds advanced.
Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 15.415, the State waives claim for any amounts
less than $2.00 over the City payment funds earlier received by the
State, and the City waives claim for the return of any amounts less
than $2.00 of such funds advanced by the City.
Section C. Acceptance of City's Final Cost Share and of Completed
Construction
It is understood and agreed that the aforesaid computation and deter-
mination by the Commissioner of Transportation of the amount due from
the City hereunder shall be final, binding and conclusive. It is
further agreed that the acceptance by the State of the completed
r
-11-
A
W_
WON
61825
construction work provided for in said State plans designated as State
Project No. 1985-76 (T.H. 494=393) and performed under contract let
by the State shall be final, binding and conclusive upon the City as
to the satisfactory completion of said work.
ARTICLE IV - GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section A. Plan Changes
The City may by a duly adopted City Council resolution request a
change or changes in the plan for State Project No. 1985-76 (T.H.
494=393) construction to be performed hereunder in order to satis-
factorily complete the aforesaid city cost participation construction,
and if the State determines that said requested plan change or changes
are necessary and/or desirable, the State will cause such change or
changes in plan to be made and appropriately alter the affected con-
tract construction.
Section B. Utility Permits
The City shall, within 30 days of the execution of this agreement,
make application to the State's District Engineer at Oakdale for a
permit or permits granting the City's permission to have placed and
thereafter maintain all of the utility facilities to be constructed
upon and within the Trunk Highway No. 149 (Dodd Road) right of way
limits under State Project No. 1985-76 (T.H. 494=393). Application
for such permit or permits shall be made on Minnesota Department of
Transportation Form 2525.
-12-
61825
Section C. utilities Maintenance
It is hereby understood and agreed that, upon the satisfactory com-
pletion of State Project No. 1985-76 (T.H. 494=393) construction, the
City shall therafter properly maintain, without cost or expense to
the State, all of the utility facilities constructed under said state
project.
Section D. Maintenance, Repair and Reconstruction of City Roadways
It is hereby understood and agreed that, upon the satisfactory com-
pletion of State Proj.ect No. 1985-76 (T.H. 494=393) construction, the
City shall thereafter, without cost or expense to the State, assume
the complete responsibility for the maintenance, repair and/or recon-
struction of the entire portions of Mendota Heights Road, Condon
Cul-de-sac, Visitation Drive and Entrances No. 5, No. 6, No. 7, No. 8
and No. 9 including all of the facilities a part thereof constructed
under said state project; and that the State has no further obligation
or responsibility for the maintenance, repair and/or reconstruction
of said City roadway portions after the satisfactory completion of said
state project construction.
Section E. Release and Conveyance of City Roadways
The State shall, upon the satisfactory completion of the state con-
tract construction to be performed hereumder, serve upon the City a
"Notice of Release" placing the entire portions of Mendota Heights
-13-
61825
Road, Condon Cul-de-sac, Visitation Drive and Entrances No. 5, No. 6,
No. 7, No. 8 and No. 9 including all of the facilities a part thereof
constructed under said state contract under the jurisdiction of the
City; and subsequent thereto, after all necessary and required docu-
ments have been prepared and processed, the State shall convey to the
City, all right, title and interest of the State in said City road-
way portions. Upon receipt of said "Notice of Release", the City
shall become the road authority responsible for said City roadway
portions so released.
Section F. Claims
It is hereby understood and agreed that any and all employees of the
State and all other persons employed by the State in the performance
of the construction and/or construction engineering work or services
required or provided for under this agreement shall not be considered
employees of the City and that any and all claims, that may or might
arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota
on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims
made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on
the part of said State employees while so engaged on any of the con-
struction and/or construction engineering work or services to be
rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility
of the City.
-14-
61825
It is hereby understood and agreed that any and all employees of the
City and all other persons employed by the City in the performance of
any of the maintenance, repair and/or reconstruction work or services
required or provided for under this agreement shall not be considered
employees of the State and that any and all claims that may or might
arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota
on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims
made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission
on the part of said City employees while so engaged on any of the
maintenance, repair and/or reconstruction work or services to be
rendered under this agreement by the City shall in no way be the
obligation or responsibility of the State.
The City at its own expense will defend, indemnify and save harmless
the State an all of its agents, officers and employees of and from
any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of action of whatsoever
nature or character arising out of or by -reason of the City's
negligent acts or omissions in connection with the maintenance,
repair and/or reconstruction work covered by this agreement, including
an action or claim which alleges negligence of the State, its agents,
officers or employees.
Section G. Nondiscrimination
The provisions of Minnesota Statute 181.59 and of any applicable local
-15-
ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination shall be con-
sidered part of this agreement as if fully set forth herein.
Section H. Agreement Approval
Before this agreement shall become binding and effective, it shall be
approved by resolution of the City Council of the City and shall also
receive the approval of such State officers as the law may provide in
addition to the Commissioner of Transportation or his duly authorized
representative.
-16-
R
61825
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF the parties have duly executed this agreement by
their duly authorized officers and caused their respective seals to be
hereunto affixed.
(City
Seal)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Recommended for approval:
0 By loaw&44�,
A Director - Office of
Design Services
B
District Engineer
By_ Assistant Division Director
Technical Services Division
Approved as to form and execution:
B
Special Assistant Attorny General
-17-
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Mayor
Date
By
City Administrator
Date
STATE OF MINNESOTA
By
Deputy Commissioner
of Transportation
Date
(Date of Agreement)
Approved:
Department of Administration
By (Authorized Signature)
Date
SCHEDULE "I"
Agreement No. 61825
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
S.P. 1909-61 (T.H. 55=1)
State Funds
S.P. 1917-24 (T.H. 149=1)
State Funds
S.P. 1985-76 (T.H. 494=393)
Fed. Proj. 1494-4(170)
S.P. 1985-78 (T.H. 494=393)
Fed. Proj. 1494-4(171) City of Mendota Heights Date: January 11, 1984
Grading, bituminous surfacing, fencing, Bridge No. 19857 and signal revision construction performed
under State Contract No.
located on T.H. 149 from the No. Jct. T.H. 55 in Eagan to 1250 Ft. So. of E.B. T.H. 494 and on T.H.
55 from approx. 500 Ft. No. of the Jct. T.H. 149 to C.S.A.H. 26 and on T.H. 494 from 3500 Ft. West
of Jct. T.H. 149 to 2700 Ft. East of the Junction.
Type and location of city cost participation construction covered under this agreement is described
in Article II of the agreement.
All of the city construction work items for this contract are listed on the following sheets.
SUMMARY:
S.P. 1985-76
Mobilization (4.164630%)
Field Office, Type D (0.0391050
Field Laboratory, Type D (0.0293280
Traffic Control (0.0782090
Subtotal
*Construction Engineering (Estimated 8%)
Grand Total - City
DIVISION -OF -COST -PARTICIPATION
NON FEDERAL -AID
100%
CITY
*Fir,1. Based on Actual Construction Engineering Costs
s
$240,757.80
10,026.67
94.15
70.61 i
188.29 J
$251,137.52
20,091.00
$271,228.52
)'1 r16 ��.
(P) = Plan Quantity
61825
SPEC. QUANTITY COST ESTIMATE
ITEM UNIT 100% 100%
No_ WORK ITEM UNIT PRICE CITY CITY
2051.501
2101.502
2101.507
2211.503
2331.504
2331.508
2331.510
2331.514
2341.504
2341.508
2357.502
2503.511
2503.511
0504.602
0504.607
0504.607
0504.607
0504.603
0504.603
0504.603
0504.603
0504.603
0504.602
Maintenance and Restoration of Haul Roads
Clearing
Grubbing
Aggregate Base Placed, Class 5
Bituminous Material for Mixture
Wearing Course Mixture (Mod.)
Binder Course -Mixture (Mod.)
Base Course Mixture (Mod.)
Bituminous Material for Mixture
Wearing Course Mixture (Mod.)
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat
15" R.C. Pipe Sewer
18" R.C. Pipe Sewer
St. Paul Standard Hydrant
6" Gate Valve and Box
12" Gate Valve and Box
16" Butterfly Gate Valve and Box
24" R.C.P. Casing Pipe 3006, Class IV
(Highway Crossing)
6" Water Main -Ductile Iron Cl. 53
12" Water Main -Ductile Iron Cl. 52
16" Water Main -Ductile Iron Cl. 52
Water Service -Air Vent Trench
Cast Iron Fittings
(P)
Lump Sum
100.00
0.40%
0.40
Tree
33.00
2
66.00
Tree
35.00
2
70.00
Cu.Yd.
8.50
242
2,057.00
Ton
180.00
80
14,400.00
Ton
9.00
380
31420.00
Ton
7.50
380
2,850.00
Ton
8.50
886
7,531.00
Ton
180.00
15
2,700.00
Ton
12.00
242
2,904.00
Gallon
0.90
276
248.40
Lin.Ft.
19.00
36
684.00
Lin.Ft.
21.00
12
252,Q0
Each
1,000.00
15
15,000 .00
Assembly
370.00
17
6,290.00 '
Assembly
910.00
4
3,640.00
Assembly
1,905.00
5
9,525.00
Lin.Ft.
35.00
114
3,990.00
Lin.Ft.
22.00
230
5,060.00
Lin.Ft.
25.00
2,730
68,250.00
Lin.Ft.
38.00
2,140
81,320.00
Lin.Ft.
5.00
100
500.00
Pound
1.00
10,000
10,000.00
Zo3s,
Total
$240,757.80
Y74�,OLOA,
1 3) /P'o
-�Ift.o \00 _ _ 1oz•r7
100% City - $240,757.80 I�IDr�LI LA�Ior.� _ I &05,Da_
s
61 825
PRORATA ITEMS
2021.501 Mobilization Lump'Sum $213,000.00
(Prorata
Percentage 4.164630%)
2031.501 Field Office, Type D Each 2,000.00
(Prorata
Percentage 0.039105%)
2031.503 Field Laboratory, Type D Each 1,500.00
(Prorata
Percentage 0.029328%)
563.601 Traffic Control Lump Sum 4,000.00
(Prorata
Percentage 0.078209%)
2051.501 Maintenance and Restoration of Haul Roads percentages are
based on a
total of 621,995 tons.
Note: Maintenance and Restoration of Haul Roads prorata share based
on materials furnished by the
contractor and hauled over public highways except state trunk
highways.
100% of the distri-
bution of this item is not accounted for herein as not all of
the state
contract work
attributable to the item is included in this SCHEDULE "I".
Formulae for determining the prorata percentages of Mobilization, Field Office,
Field Laboratory,
Traffic Control and construction engineering are listed below and shall be applied as shown on the
front sheet of this form.
A = Total Contract Amount
M = Total Mobilization Amount
0 = Total Field Office Amount
L = Total Field Laboratory Amount
T = Total Traffic Control Amount
E = Total Construction Engineering Cost Amount Incurred in Connection with State Ccntr.act No.
P = Prorata Percentage
M : (A - M - 0 - L - T) x 100 = P (Percentage for Mobilization)
0 ((A - M - O - L - T) x 100 = P
L (A - M - 0 - L - T) x 100 = P
(Percentage for Field Office)
(Percentage for Field Laboratory)
T . (A - til - O - L - T) x 100 = P (Percentage for Traffic Control)
(E a A) x 100 = P (Percentage for City Construction Engineering)
After the project has been awarded, unit bid prices will be used to compute new prorates percentages.
-3-
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 30, 1984
TO City Adm' ,istfator, Mayor and City,Counci.l
+4yr.".i;w. _'` Xs1..i-. �'`,.: ''` 3�-. ,.p r _e' _ �'r. ,. - <2 • �.�,k; 5^ :S '9� L•�-y>._...... .
r _-Y3 «,t,. w f1. .A' �.k`:L'�M �'. � .... ... _ .,. . .. .. .. - - N,�n).'....ti.v[eC 1Y'✓W N i.!�+.L�. �..• _ M1 �v '
r FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Meeting Conflict/Precinct Caucus
Minnesota Statutes, Section 202a.14, Subdivision 1, was amended during
the 1983 legislative session to establish the third Tuesday in March in
every state General election year as the precinct caucus date. Section 2.02a.19
was also amended to stipulate that no City Council or other public body may
;. conduct a public meeting after -6:00 P.M: on precinct caucus dates. The
;.
-Council''s regularly scheduled March 20th meeting date'is therefore in con
flict with state statutes. _
'Legislation which existed prior to the 1983 session scheduled the
fourth Tuesday in February as the caucus date. Public meetings were allowed :.. �.
to be conducted until 7:00 o'clock P.M. on that date.
In consideration of the conflict, the Council must decide whether to:
1. Reschedule the time of the March 20th meetinn so that 6:00 P.M.
adjourment is possible.
2. Reschedule the meeting to a different date (Note: The fourth
Tuesday in February is unavailable because the Planning Commission
is scheduled to meet -in the Council Chambers that evening.)
3. Cancel the meeting. (Note: No items of business have yet been
scheduled for March 20th, so any of the options could be considered
workable at this time.)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the meeting be rescheduled for a different day
in the third week of March.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Reschedule or cancel March 20th City Council meeting.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
�0� February 2, 1984
TO: City A#inistrator, Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Amendment.to Council Procedures Ordinance
At the January 31st Adjourned Meeting, Council directed' staff to
prepare an amendment to delete the Order of Business (agenda structure
section) from the Council procedures ordinance. An amending Ordinance
has been drafted and is attached for Council review.
If the Council adopts the amendment, staff will generally follow the
order of business format suggested in Kevin's January 25th memo, commencing
with the February 21st agenda.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Council adoption of Ordinance No. 205, "An Ordinance Amending
Ordinance No. 102".
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 102
The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, ordains as
�. _.. ..
follows:..
SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 102, known and referred to as "An Ordinance
Establishing Rules Governing Conduct and Procedure of the City Council of
the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota" is hereby amended in the following
respect:
A. Section 4 of said Ordinance is amended in its entirety so that
as so amended, said paragraph. shall read as follows:
SECTION 4. Order of Business
At the hour appointed for meeting, the members shall
be called to order by the Mayor, and in his absence by the
Acting Mayor, and in the absence of both, the Clerk. The
Clerk shall call the roll, note the absentees and announce
whether a quorum is present. In the absence of the Clerk,
the Mayor shall appoint a Secretary pro tem.
s
Upon the appearance of a quorum, the Council shall adopt
an agenda for the meeting and shall proceed to conduct.
business in the order established therein.
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after its publication according to law.
Enacted and ordained into an Ordinance this 7th day of February, 1984.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Robert G. Lockwood
Mayor
ATTEST':
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
k
MEMO
February 1, 1984
T0. "Mayor, Cit Council and City inistrator
FROM: Dennis J. Delmonts.;.
: ` `.r Y•� ! - _j4'.�.b'z�'.-•1..
°T..>... Chief- :of -Police . 1 *~:c k... _
SUBJECT: Receipt of Donation, y'•`;,�= F's;
History F
On January 28, 1984, the Vasatka-Goers VFW Club in Mendota honored the
members of the Mendota Heights Police and Fire Departments with a
dinner and dance. In addition, they presented each unit with a Certificate,.`-,.-.--
of
ertificate,.'::.;of Appreciation and a gift of $100.00.
Requested Action ... - �, ..:r ' �' j.:..;• - y�.�.;xv.•��;a�;:R�'.;
I request that the Council approve the acceptance of this geiierous.'gi°ft°
and that the" Police Department be allowed to use the funds to purchage'''�
equipment for the officers' use.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
WM
February 7, 1984
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. Frazel
City Administra
SUBJECT: Agenda Addition and Follow-up Materials
INTRODUCTION
Additional or supplemental materials are provided for agenda items
6a and 7. Staff d. It is further requested that Item 7. Staff j., be added
to the agenda.
6a. Fred Lambrecht - Petition from Friendly Hills Civic Association
re: Eagan Race Track Site:
Attached are two letters that were received in our office yesterday,
which pertain to the race track issue.
The first is a lengthy letter from Eagan City Administrator Tom Hedges,
providing some initial response to the concerns expressed in our letter of
January 18th. Limited copies will be available at the meeting for represent-
atives of Friendly Hills. Also, I will be prepared to give a quick oral
synopsis of the letter should Council desire.
The second letter is, ironically, a request from the Inver Grove Heights
Development Corporation requesting you to consider action endorsing the Eagan
race track site.
Councilmember Witt is bringing a large map of the proposed location and
layout of the site, which can be used at the meeting, if necessary.
7. Staff d. - Evergreen Knolls feasibility study:
Attached is an amended resolution receiving the Engineer's report on
Evergreen Knolls, and calling for the public hearing. The only change from
the resolution submitted in the Council packet is the change of the public
hearing date from February 21st to March 6th. This is necessary to allow
for two publications, as required by statute.
7. Staff J. - $11,000,000 Mortgage Revenue Bond Indenture:
At the request of Standard and Poor's rating agency, O'Connor and Hannan
are asking that Council approve a resolution adopting a Supplemental Indenture
to the Mortgage Revenue Bond issue for Lexington Heights apartments. Council
approval of the proposed resolution is recommended.
of eaga-
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
February 6, 1984
Honorable Mayor and Members
City Council
City of Mendota Heights
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, Minnesota
FEB - 6 1984
of the
55102
Re: Laukka-Beck-Eagan and Minnesota Jockey Club
Development Proposals
Dear Lady and Gentlemen:
BEA BLOMQUIST
Mayor
THOMAS ELAN
JAMES A. SMITH
JERRY THOMAS
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
THOMAS HEDGES
City Admiristrator
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
I am writing this preliminary response to you at the
request of Mayor Blomciuist, who asked that we respond promptly
with preliminary information to your letter of January 18.
The Eagan City Council has not met since the arrival of your
letter, so the comments contained herein should be regarded as
preliminary and provisional. We are responding, in this manner,
however, in order to give you immediately our initial reactions
to the concerns you raised.
Accordingly, I would like to respond to the issues in the
order contained in your letter.
1. Rezoning or the pressure for changing land uses between
the Friendly Hills neighborhood and the proposed racetrack.
I do not believe it is appropriate for the City of Eagan to
make suggestions to the City of Mendota Heights regarding land use
within its own borders. Any rezoning of land within the City of
Mendota Heights must be determined by yourselves alone. Prip-r-to„
to the recent development proposals, the portion of the f-a-ukka-
5eeck--p-rcipartv locat-ed- wj--tM—in the City of Eagan was zoned commercial
"7n -d- s our comprehensive an guide as a proposed regionlal-
s oppi.nq center. The proposed density .and use for the Laukka"
Beck commercial develoRment is approximately 197.6 acres. The
proposed racetrack portion is approximately 231 acres. he
combined square Tootage -Zo-f-construction propose -d -for -the entire
planned unit development is substantially less than was contemplated
for the regional shopping center. The City of Eagan has not -r-e-zo-n-gd
THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Page Two
any of the parcels adjacent to the.Laukka-Beck parcel at this
time, and no such rezoning is currently contemplated. I have
attached to this letter a series of site plans showing the
existing zoning, land use guide plan, and conceptual land
use plan for the Laukka-Beck parcel and surrounding parcels.
It is the opinion of 'our staff and consultants that the
existence of the 494 corridor, which appears to be approximately
375 feet in average width, exclusive of its intersections, will
serve as a natural buffer between any development on the Laukka-
-Beck parcel and the land adjacent to the 494 corridor to the
north. Conversely, it is also our opinion that the existence of
of t e -Land adjacent to the 494 corridor to the north, tan nthe-
a , po` _a 1 developments in Eagan. As I say, however, Me�
of Eagan does not wish to presume upon the City or Men ota Heights
planning with regard to these areas
2. Public Safety involving the additional need for fire
and police protection as well as the likelihood of increased
crime in areas surrounding the facility.
The Minnesota Jockey Club will be required to hire its own
security force consisting or =y trained and certifleU warrant
o ficers and ire safety personnel. Their employment roster shows
a peak force of 44 such employees. There will be round-the-clock
surveillance by their own force year in and year out. Their
Director of -security is an individual well known and highly
regarded by the chiefs in the area. The security force is
designed and equipped to have so-called "first call capability"
in terms of both public safety and fire. The Eagan Police and
Fire Departments conduc.ted extensive research on these subjects.
Their opinions, -as reported to the Eagan City Council, are that
there does not appear to be an increased demand for fire service
rom a race rac , and there does not appea a an increase
cF emand on public sa e. y officers, with e possible exc�ption-Of
tra is control_ which wille e by uniformed, offi minty
officers paid by the racing facility. There appears to be a
very modest amount of perip era me, at or below the level
that would be expected in a regional shopping center. a Eagan
=1y Counci is saElsElea ENaUe manageable
within its current budgets. The grandstand, Jockey Club and stables
will'be equipped with automatic fire suppression equipment. Fire
hose connections will be provided so that fire trucks can be parked
some distance away. Looped water mains will be used to provide
sufficient water pressure. The racetrack will have a crui.-k resnone
featu" -4-te tn be operatpiLby track personnel for dealing with
small fires. The racetrack will contract wit a private service o
,5 o - ambulance and trained life support personnel.
r
Page Three
3. Diversion of traffic, especially onto Trunk Highway
149 and County Road 63 (Delaware Avenue).
The racetrack is a regional facility and as such will
attract people from within the entire Metropolitan area, as
well as some out -state visitors. The traffic forecasts
generated for the racetrack site by BRW, the traffic consultants
for the EIS process, were based on the Metropolitan area regional
population. Because the racetrack is located adjacent to major
regional and interstate highways, most of the trips to and from
minor increases inraffic. Trunk Highway 149 north of Interstate
494 will experience a 5% increase in_traffic directly attributable
to the racetrack. This_amounts to about 300 additional vehicular
trri. per day_ Delaware Avenue (County Road 63) will have -a-7--777%
increas
-
increase in traffic as a result of the racetrack. This amount—s `b—
an additional 100 vehicular trips, all of which were originated
in the local area. Delaware venue does not have an interchange
with Interstate 494 so it will not receive any interstate traffic.
Neither Trunk Highway 149 nor County Road 63 connect with any
regional road systems north of Interstate 494.
4. Noise, including both anticipated noise generation of
the crowds and public address system at the site, and the possibilit
that aircraft will be diverted northerly of the existing flight
corridor to avoid conflict with track operations.
With reference to the first part of the question, regarding
noise generated by the track, either through crowd noise or public
address system: the midpoint o is located slightly
more than—E6 miles ue south of the 494 right -o -w&)4,,and separa ed
therefrom by a series —of low-lying hills. (The racetrack is to be
-built into a natural bowl between a series of hills.) It is the
�. opinion o our consultants that it is extremely unlikely that an
in ividual standing on the south border ot the 494 ri -o -wa
will be either able to see (at nig or Hear the racetrack, given
the dista this oint and the natural topo ra h iri
The consultants accordingly are o e opinion that it is inconceivable
there will be a noise impact from the track on residents
.currently living more than a half mile north of the 494 right-of-way.
Page Four
The consultants have pointed out that the noise impact of the
494 corridor on residents living north thereol will BeTa—r-----
more scan an anything that is anti cipae o
from Ene race rac .
With reference to the second part of your question regarding
possible diversion of the existing flight corridor to avoid
conflict with track operations: the City Council has addressed
this issue emphatically by a resolution that no request for
deviation of flight path will be permitted by the City of Eagan.
This public policy posture, which was a part of the initial
approvals, has been reinforced by the action of the developers
who have agreed with the Metrp_ ol_itan Airports Commission MA "
to gran��IAC a so-called air e ment w is—wives o MAC the
7
right o fly aircx-aft over the site, together with the riQ o
cause any noise attendant to the ordinary operation of such air
�r� The applicant has agree easeme will
be execute as a part ot its application to the Minnesota Racing
Commission. From the poi—n-tof poi—n—view of our staff, i Is—a—rdIs-7ffa—rd to
conceive of a more definitive resolution of the matter. We do
not believe an ordinary private developer on the site would have
agreed to such an easement, and, therefore, the residents of the
surrounding areas- are, in our view, more protected by this decision
and agreement than they could otherwise hope to be.
For your reference, the background to this grant of easement
.was a aeries of meetings -among t e developers, engineers, MAC,
the Metro olitan Counci eso a F=utlon Contro=
Agency ("MPCA , and the Federal Aviation Administration at which
meet ings e a a obtainea by each of the participants was
compared and agreed to be comparable. The data collectively
agreed,to indicated normal and_peak noise eve s were we within
the- recommended noise. qt-anda_rds for nutdoor recreational art lvlty.
MPCA has -defined a racetrack as an outdoor redrea-clonal use for
noise purposes.
Please rest assured that the environmental impact statement
will specifically address and document these issues to the satis-
faction of the various state agencies concerned and that of the
City of Eagan as the responsible governmental unit. The informa-
tion contained in this letter should be regarded, as I indicated
above, as tentative and provisional, and subject to such final
documentation and approval by the City of Eagan.
9
Page Five
Finally, you have expressed concern that the issues
raised in your letter be properly addressed in the environmental
impact statement with reference to the concerns of Mendota
Heights as well as those of Eagan. Please be assured that the
analysis of -the impacts associated with the proposed land -u --se'
development {which includes the racetrack) is not at all llmlte
to thepoiltic �iurisdiction of Eagan, but rather in-c-i-Uff-es trie
entire�ub-�region -(—includ!nq Mendota Heights, Sun is Lake
and Inver Grov Helahts), he area ot intluence oF any
particularimpactis, of course, a function of what is the
subject matter.
Mayor Blomquist wishes to join me in expressing our,
appreciation to the City of Mendota Heights for bringing these
matters to our attention in this manner and permitting us to
respo . nd to your immediate concerns. Please communicate with
us again after you have had the opportunity to evaluate this
information, if such evaluation raises further questions or
concerns.
A
Attachments
Very truly yours,
Fi V-IC3� -k,4 ?"
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
uil
�LaukkaMin'Beck
ota Jokey Club
PI 1 I I�Er
' Figure 1 y
Eleyat�r°n
040.
®
® 8a0-880
020" 040
90900-020
® 840-960
In 880 -Ow
Cl 840`
all. T
122gal*►
". `:>,"=':
-,..:
sallsell-
i. -6 1984
Inver Grove Heights Development Corp.
217 Livestock Exchange Building, So. St. Paul, MN. 55075
(612) 451-2266
February 3, 1984
Mayor Robert Lockwood
City of Mendota Heights
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120
Dear Mayor Lockwood:
Our Development Corporation has closely monitored the progress of the
Horse Racing Facility. Recently we endorsed the Eagan proposal.
Mdy we invite you to ask your City Council to consider similar action?
We believe that some evidence of area unanimity will be influential to
the Racing Commission.
The City of Eagan has developed a thoughtful study of the various im-
pacts that a facility of this magnitude will have. As you. know, Eagan
approved the proposal based on the data in that study. Documentation
of that action, and additional information, can be obtained from the
Eagan City offices if needed.
Based on our study, the Eagan site is not only superior to the other
proposed sites, but the economic benefits to our area will also be
far greater if the Horse Racing Facility is located there. We further
believe that the thorough plan prepared by the project developers is
evidence of their high calibur and qualifications.
Our position statement, which you may feel free to use as a sample
resolution for your Council's consideration,'is enclosed. Thank you
for your consideration.
Sincerely,
George K ssan
President
GK:cs
Encl:
The Inver Grove Heights Development Corporation has evaluated the pro-
posed sites for the Twin Cities Horse Racing facility, and supports the
site proposed for the City of Eagan.
The Development Corporation believes that with the completion of I-494
and the reconstruction of Minnesota 49, and with the transportation network
formed by..other highways,in the vicinity, the Eagan site is the most access-
ible one to the horse racing facility's primary and secondary markets.
Furthermore, its accessibility to the Twin Cities Metropolitan Airport pro-
vides an,additional convenience for�non-local owners, breeders, trainers,
and fans.
Additionally, the rural nature of Dakota County, the excellent local
transportation network in the county, and the availability of land for
small acreage farms, combine to offer facilities and amenities that will
encourage and foster the horse -breeding industry.
The Development Corporation further believes that the project propon-
ents have prepared a development plan that addresses the health and safety
concerns of the public, the comfort requirements of racing patrons and
participants, and the financing requirements of the investment community.
The inclusion in the development plan of sites that will adequately accom-
modate the supporting commercial services needed by the public is an in-
telligent land use decision that will be instrumental in preventing future
congestion.
Finally, the Development Corporation views the Project Review Procedures
conducted by the City of Eegan, and the city's subsequent approval of all
aspects of the proposal, as evidence of both a thorough examination of the
project's potential impacts, and of enthusiastic citizen support for the
project. The citizens and officials of the City of Eagan are commended
for their thorough and expeditious review of the proposal. .
For those reasons, as well as because of the projected new employment
and additional taxable valuation which the horse racing facility will gen-
erate, the Inver Grove Heights Development Corporation supports the Eagan
site, urges the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Racing Commission
to designate it as the Twin Cities' Horse Racing Facility, and urges the
City of Inver Grove Heights to consider action supporting the Eagan pro-
posal.
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT
AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED SANITARY
SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER, AND STREET IMPROVE-
MENTS TO SERVE EVERGREEN KNOLLS (GRYC SUBDIVISION)
(IMPROVEMENT NO. 83, PROJECT NO. 4)
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has submitted his report to the City Council
with respect to the proposed construction of the following improvements
to serve Evergreen Knolls (Gryc Subdivision) and adjacent areas, to -
wit:
The construction of an extension to the City's sanitary sewer
system, including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the
acquisition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary
of streets and easements in the areas hereinafter more particularly
described.
The construction of a storm sewer system including appurtenances
and incidentals thereto and the acquisition of easements, in and for
the area hereinafter more particularly described.
The construction of an extension to the City's water distribution
system including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acqui-
sition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets
and easements in the area hereinafter more particularly described.
The construction of street improvements consisting of the acquisi-
tion of easements and the grading, stabilization, drainage and bitumi-
nous surfacing, and the construction of concrete curbs and gutters on
the streets to be situated in the area hereinafter more particularly
described.
WHEREAS, the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is
situated within the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minne-
sota, and is more particularly described as follows:
Land abutting the East line of Section 23, Township 28 North,
Range 23 West and South of Wentworth Avenue (CR 8) and North
of Bachelor Avenue together with the West 211.74 feet of the
East 566.85 feet of Lot 36, and the West 1 acre of Lot 36, and
the East 1 acre of the West 2 acres of Lot 36, together with
Lots 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 of Auditors Subdivsion No. 3, Section 24,
Township 28 North, Range 23 West.
WHEREAS, in said report said City Engineer reported that the proposed
improvements and construction thereof were feasible and desirable and
further reported on the proposed costs of said improvements.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows:
1. That the report of said City Engineer be and is hereby re-
ceived.
2. That a public hearing on said improvements be held on Tuesday,
March 6, 1984 at 7:45 o'clock P.M. at the Mendota Heights City
Hall 750 South Plaza Drive in the City of Mendota Heights.
3. That the City Clerk, with the aid and assistance of the City
Attorney, be and is hereby authorized and directed to prepare a notice
of said hearing and to cause said notice to be published and mailed to
the owners of the property situated within said area, all in accordance
with applicable Minnesota Statutes.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this Seventh
day of February, 1984.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
OICONNOR & HANNAN
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3800 1 D S TOWER
80 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-2254
WALTER C. PARKINS
DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
(612) 343-1233
Ms. Kathleen Swanson
City Clerk
City of Mendota
750 South Plaza
Mendota Heights,
(612) 341-3800
TELEX 29-0584
TELECOPIER 612 341-3800 (256)
February 6, 1984
Heights
Drive
Minnesota 55120
SUITE BOO
1919 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N. W.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006 •3463
(202) 887-1400
SUITE 3100 SECURITY LIFE BUILDING
1616 GLENARM PLACE
DENVER,COLORADO 80202-4366
(30 3) 573-7737
VELAZOUEZ, 21
MADRID 1, SPAIN
431-31-00
i TELEX 23543
Re: $11,000,000 City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota
Housing Mortgage Revenue Bonds
Dear Ms. Swanson:
Enclosed please find a form of Supplemental Indenture.
The Supplemental Indenture is necessitated by the Standard &
Poor's Rating Agency and contains no additional restrictions
or responsibilities to the City. The Supplemental Indenture
merely requires the Trustee to exercise more defined responsibilities
in connection with the Letter of Credit on each Interest
Payment Date and allows the investment of the bond proceeds
in any investment approved by the bank issuing the Letter of
Credit if authorized by law. I have also enclosed a Resolution
which,I would appreciate being considered on February 7,
1984 and, if passed, I would appreciate five copies of the
Supplemental Indenture being signed and notarized on the
night of the meeting. If you would advise us of the availability
of the signed Resolution and Supplemental Indenture, we will
be pleased to have them picked up.
In the event you have any questions regarding the
enclosures, please do not hesitate to contact me at your
convenience.
Very truly yours_
Wa ter Parkins
WCP:kml
Enclosures
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE
REGARDING THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA,
$11,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF HOUSING
MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS (LEXINGTON HEIGHTS APARTMENTS
PROJECT) DATED AS OF DECEMBER 1, 1983.
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota (the
"City") has approved the issuance of its $11,000,000 of
aggregate principal amount of Housing Mortgage Revenue Bonds
(Lexington Heights Apartments Project) dated as of December
1, 1983 (the "Bonds"); and
WHEREAS, a rating of the Bonds has been requested from
Standard & Poor's Corporation (the "S&P"); and
WHEREAS, S&P has required that the Indenture be supplemented
as set forth in the Supplemental Indenture; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Trustee under the Indenture
are authorized under Section 801 (a) and (b) of the Indenture
to correct any ambiguities, supply any admission and correct
any inconsistent provisions in the Indenture; and
WHEREAS, this Supplemental Indenture is being entered
into for the purpose specified in said Section 801 (a) and
(b) .
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of
the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota:
1. The Supplemental Indenture attached hereto as a
part hereof as Exhibit A is hereby approved and adopted by
the Citv; and
v
s
2. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to take all steps necessary and desirable to implement
the Supplemental Indenture and are authorized to sign and
affix the seal of the City thereto.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1984.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
( SEAL) By
Its Mayor
And
City Clerk
-2-
��� �/
�� � _
��
��, /�� / / � � � — _ ' �
�� / � � _ i �
,\` / , / _ — .� � \
' �l`- --------if---'---'-----'----- �\ ��^�� =1 /�
j/ � / . \ � � (V =
�� �� LDT 1 WILLOW SPRING�ADD. � �
ii�t- �r------ -- ---------------- � I I Q��
� i�� // � � � � ,� ��� . //
I � 0 J
��� �4� F,,, � _------ __ _ �\ ; !� I O � / w Z
, �� G�� � �' � \ p�y� -- -- � � �.\ � i 1 � QQ���v /� Q � �cr�
� �y i/ i�v� �Z W __ O�% �\ � / 1 � V�' MOWING�/ Z W �u
% \ � ij � / � Q � G, hPP t1�� �\ \ /� � �` �\ LIMITS � � � Ve'
� -- � � �� O - � , - oW
i „ � � o � t-...� � , �, � ' � � _ ` _ � - - - - c�
i� /� j� .. � � __��- - �O O �_�— �- G ses.rs � � � � _ - - - - m° ?
/�� ('�/ /� � / , � - - ' �� �.-��WOODED 'AREA"_"' I �\ RIP-RAP \ � \ - - � . � ` ��1' \ `\ Q - -- -.az Q/�
O°°z- u Ii .� � G_---- �-- , �-- `.� -
� � ` �� ,% �-WOODED Q � g� , _ —
� \` ��� � i AREA �t� � ' ' ' G � � 98 � , � � � � _ _�• �.r.,� ��� . ��. •
O \ '�I" . � �B � i
/ � � ' ! B80
ii � _ _ - - - - - , 0� , � —,.�,✓ i l i � � � � l
� ' ' ',---r`"- ---- __�'"`_ -- _i . ---
�// EXJ ING � . ,' ' • � • ', _--�'�"'� � � \ - �." _ J j � ' � '
n ' -� � _ ,
u � CR�EK � � '• � .-- -- ` _ ` ee6 _ —'e'.
-�-r-i � ' • ,
O� �' / � � � i// - � � e� �� � 897 , , -
Q 2 � / I / . a7 � �, ' - - - - •an�,. �
�Q �� <'�� / �� ����� � j � 883 1 \ � � , �� ,� l0T 3 (vntaNT1
O � ,`�� l/ � / i �,� 1 • � "�� . \` � `� . ��• ��• \ � ` �
� � �`, • � � , � � / / n �+ee WILLOW SPRING ADD.
7�� � � � ��� / � � �� r ��� , , , - - � � �� aas i , � � ,
u � , i ,'
�/O �q�/Nq E � � \ b�v� �� �� •' � i� / �' / � _ - � � - - - - - ' _ \ `` , i / / POTENTIq4�HUil01NG SIJg � l � � SHE�O MOUSE SET&4CK�
, a, . � • �
�� �'1�%IV � � � . , '- ' �.. , / FIR5T FLOOR 898.0
�� ��� � � ��I'?1 � ��� � � POTENTIA'l'8UlLAING SI.TE� � ' ' ,r pSM�� 'B89A A,
POTEN tAL 9UILDIN(i SITE � � -'
4 n � .1' \ ,/i i / a� : � FIRST FLOOR 890.0 � � ,� � � � "",
�l ��`� h � % �L�P'N/ ��w � �/ / � FIRST FI.�R 884A � � ••, _BSMTT. 88i.0 ' � �'
ll � n / � �# i / ia� � BSM'T. 8T5A � �, .. • ' � � �' �" �e+:
d � �� � � �, �� / �� r, f f. . � � Y p
ll � \ �� l i�/ �����P / i f i � �� � � � µ�
�� � �/i • i / � � �
// � �� / /��� � � � ' � � � � � _, A}� r Y u
�� ` �i � f� ��� � EXISTIN�G�� / � i � _ � < ' � 69 e9> � " - - � � _ � 3 �
��l �i� .; "j�-���Y '� � � � � ASEMENT 8� / / � - � / ' ee9 '�m �i � � � ' � m S � � � - v� . ML � t�i
�/ + `\y � ��� � �IMITS � 88 � � � � eBg - �N i � � � � � � � , - '
� 2"Q, �r \ � � � - � �3 i � _ _ - J�
.; � ,,..�,. ., �3a,�!%?, � ' � - - - - - - f2oi.s'f � � -ii2o'1 � .90 � � � ' � � _ - ti2o' �-
-%' �` `'� r. ;1' `� � ' - ' ' ' " , �
• �� �'�\� � � �'�'� - + I i�..8. _��T�_olCurb 8755 � LC.B825 � Q LC.B88.3 � � LC.B910 _ _ _ �LC_89BA
='___Q ���'i��'a�s. ' )� •'i�ff .. �}' _ _Z_ ___=_—...zc—__—__ __r---__�_--_3.-�_—___ ���__'4�__—_~'r-_—__�—{r__ _.—_r—_______ —__---___
Y � � �, 1 ,� �----- -�------�- � 'kr- 1
� i CONC. C. 6 G � �„� �M � � i
i ' �,X � r ..' I y � "�i � � �i � i�� � i—r--i i : "'WATER i �r—_�. i ' I ---r--�-- � �
� i ,, ;� �,j Y y i ` � ��� � i • � +a , i I
.� �,f� i � d � � y � I s_ SECTION 24
,° � i r � I 1 1 1
. ;,.3 ' � � ��� �� i.00 � � � zroo I I 3��n � i t _ �
� � . . � '- ' � '� �„t - � _ i �.— � _ --�- — � T — '� i — T —T' SECTION 25
� .
'/
� � i"r "� 1t i h � _�. . . -:/ �. SEWER�_ � � � � ' � ' I I �
t� r',� 8T�4; � gW i ' . �j� __ 24°R_C.P __ � � � 8 � � � � �
.�,,i i . , � f�; .. C.B. � --- ---
k-'h Ehi �� i,�N/��i���-� �-� === =� � �oN�.--�.-� �=- � � MAR I E AVENUE
1,�{ yy � ',:;�i'/ �
� I I
y tN ��`;���
' � � n-�
�
s' �,`:;� �� `y,�
. ��',� ' /
i �
i/
/
NORTH SCALE�
/�
N / ' LEDGEND Plan:
Note� '"� _.EXISTING CONTOURS � 3 � ( "• 20�
A SUGGESTED METHOD FOR SUBDIVIDING ��
I.OT 2 WILI.OW SPRINGS ADDITION BY
UTILIZING A CREEK R�LOCATION AND
CERTAIN VARIANCES.
Jan. 18, 1984
J�_ SUGGESTED CANTOURS
�'T "�. POTENTIA� FLOOOING LIMITS
8 6
0
SCNEME N0. OF
WILLOW SPRING ADD. LOT 2- STORM
SEWER IMPROVEM�NT- John Callahan
�8 '
CITY OF MENUOTA IIE[GHTS
750 South Plaza Drivc Mendotn Heights, Minnesota
n
W 33' 3J�'
——-—�-a '�;i
�x
� �I�
u � :LI � 1 I
� ^ 'J �
� :�I�
0
�S
�::�� I
�
s [
�y �
.1�.:�
3 ;
w
tJ') ,
'
♦ ' , $iAl,OEN
„�
;� �!�(
—1 I — E%�ST
"_— _ '—EM- SAN. " ' ' _ '
790
OEValER10
f05!
197
_�_
7�
MC GOwN
WENTWpR7N P�HN
1
—WENTWORTH AVENUE
�
CTY. RD. 8
� : ' � '
(''�j I ' 691
I I •'••' � � � � ' � � I lCMIM/Q
�+�I 1�0 � 7SI 770 j�'�— y,�'�-.-y1t � ' I I .
���5 8 9 MLIN6Nf� N�LER IIEMER ' �" 1--4 I
_ _ I __ _ �T21 120 716
�NA�K REUOING OECLEII I . lUGO
7 I 10 �
� � ��
I .. � i .
}- ; I � � / - - — ...�.._
Qt I 2 � 3 / 1 ��, / . 11
N � 6
6�� I I / /5 \ !v� 3 � BLK. 2
Z::• 3 I / � 1:...
c�n::.::.: :.:�: ;::;. ::::: w P. P � w q ERM ' ����,
W f � N �, �
3 \ ,Z
QO �� , W� w ,� �.;a
8 � ��;7
� SAN%�QRY �SE
W R � :
.:,,:;
� — — � q / . / . . , . / . '.., • q _"iY+'t!i�IY,
i ---( / �.l / t.
� ..�.:
��
i i � � oQ°-
.\:}?Yvt:::n :r::::::::::::ar.. �:::w: : ::�:::::x::: : ::rrN:::rx.v •x::::::.�::::h - �
•h:•.Ay.... . .� ��f:Y� .1'L:} ... � �
•::::::::::•: :••:' . '6::::.:�.�: :.. ., ..... ............... ...�.....; .........; ..: ... ,
I '
\ I I 2 / 3 � � � � Q
�S � 6,� p � � � tl CI � a
� +. P. W A E�� 1 i f�/,� I N , o' � �
\ .N' �y / ' A, ' J3 • / $
� / � ���
�, 4 , ,
� _ �^ ` � ;; ' �
L '
.1} J ± /I �/
� � � �; ,_ W
, . ; z�3
4, � -i�
, ,
�n _ " I '••�.^;.;'.�:EVERGREEN KNOLL.'•'•:�:;;::;;;::?`;#.^;.;{ ' ,'
/ Z � / \ � .. :�,;.tr
I " w —� • w �_ v }
�13 � � 8 � �( .
��1 i � . Y
'' '' I � NI
:.:, ��� �
{:::: ��' ,
_ ----------�1_--- ---- -�-- D � � , � / 8 ' ��� � '- - � - 4 -� :\ I - / � � SE1�✓ER � �
� � . . � � . .. . O � / \ . � H
a / / :::� � � � z
� # / , s io I ii ' 1z BLK i. \ 1e / i9 I zo I zi � 22 I 2a 3:
� ( / / � s�' � � � � � �s �� � � I ' � � � %
�
a
W �}:ti?:�:v iiiti�:i}� h:::::{::•'ri:�:{{�:i� �:�iii}:'r::}} ;i}:
•:.,::•:::. �:: .�};;•�:.}•:::. �.;;:::::::: {::::::.; •. �. �::.;'y.:•.•;,
........... :� :............... .. ...... .. . .. ..... ......... . . .
. .. ... . ... .. .. ... ... ..........::.::•:;•: �:� :::::� ::::::::: ;.; .: ;.:
Q s �,..�� . ... ..
3 : / �_. -- . . �, ;
- s �' �� �" -` \\
_ ; „- .,..� �.
N m � . \��
o � _ .:.''
� '�
��
� '� `' %� ��
I ; �1
II
�� 1�
, 11
II
; ' . �� - . . . .��
. �:: ' i� . � . . . (I
��ti 1
..iz'.i�'''•a`'-- --_- =-== -=---=----=---- �'
€
�W
r,
� �_ -
1 3 .
r� �
no .
8
............................................................... --- ------... �i � /
� /' , %
�� � ,
/'� ,_
PAH 7 OOIf COURS[ /' � /~
' j
�
N
... . . . / � pJ .
t i <.
i %
�
. . . ... . . / .� - . . . ' .
'
::•: F_�_f �� i� �N i ExISTINGEYrTEP—I � --------- -----------' SCALE
� � NORTH �
------:>�;— ,�.�,�;,T;�;:=—__._ —__...._..__-.__�___ •�-__===_=3,E�.9�aR:� , -- BACHELOR AVENUE ------------ �-------- • �
;r:;:� � ' I "=100
�X
O M I I 'i
I
Q i' IP S��H ~ 30 30� � I i ' .
ir r �,
I� � ~
_ _� e ^ „
- f==== i�!
�
\ �
��
--- �96 lB8 116 7'3B 81TTIJ
W�IZ NEtNCME E9CH
DEVITi
MqTNE _
Q NOBRIN
ey
� ( ,Z� FEp `i �66' � FEASIBILITY REPORT .
"`RR" % EVERGREEN KNOLL ADDITION
�eNnson � �yJ �zo �ie nx �oe iw . �' ,
Z 1DROJNOWlNI MESSEL N�NM �ION[TTI 81UM�NN ;�; J08 No. 8313 IMP. 83 FROJ: 4.
g %�;� CiTY OF M�NDOTA HEIGHTS
� �� � 75D South Plaza Drive Mendota 1-3eigjrts. M3nnespta
� � � Scheme 'C3' SHEET NO.
� . 3 bf 4
p��° �� � � :�,. ��,
... _�'';''•::''.
::�.� �
, ,:�• ���:�:�.
s ..1 24"
� . .• •,•,�
' ; �
/ / i:'
::.
::
� :;:;:
/__"__. " "_'.. ......_ .' ' .; .
G�C�Q�C� �>`1`'
��':••an� IWI
�11�NCJIE�ASEN DFVnIFRI�
. ��;,' .., t,,
`'�►15, +:;• !t:.
;:., �.;::c'.
i����:�:, ::::�:
7,1;; ;�ti,�
� ..
s�inen
> r„ .
C `` �
t �__J
��=�=---=_ -=_
rosn
)9!
WENiWO�TN o.A�
--- --- --- --- -- � - —WENTWORTH AVENUE CTY. RD. 8
�; �;.;; :vx::;: •S •,,.•: :•::::: xc;v:::.:::;�4>t � � �
.: r •..i�. i ::.; •.:�•r..w::'v:::.�Y.
.�. � �Z �
:��# c� ��� C� I� ' C�� ,� �
I� � 69�
�_� � � `- i
'�^ . --j .. SCMMM
160 �IO 1!1 - 170 - � . � I . __'____ ._"' __. _
M� r(J�yN LEW13 �—� I
..- B 9 .. — ML�NCNEIi IUL�.ER 21ENER _ _—_
i�:, �zo ,�b
�P��R REOD�NG DFf+IEN ' ��.. 1VL10
� � ----_� �
' I
r.. . i . I �p � W
Is;:t..: :•::::: :•:: •:: �;.1.. . . ..... ��; f....::.;.•:{: �.:: v.}v::: ::t::j::r::.;•:.;• ;rr:.::ti{t{.v:::ti;:.x:•{}}. ti{vv :•::::::t'.': Y' � 9 g
i;::4::4:•i:•:•::':•.�::.:;:;{}..:•:�::•:ti?�::;:;:,'v v.{i•::�:.;}:;ti�.:. .:�i•::�.:::i•:}:•::f•::•i::::}::..:. I �
r ..Y. .:• __ __ '
�n . . .: ___. ____. __.._.__. _ ____---___ o
t:.t .........:::::i'...:::.:: :Y::...:. ` N �• . ..\::.:•:t:l �::.' ': A- Y
•,} , , � z ' , / � \ •}.I �: �:.I . . i . ..Z : /}:3: • � •�
:
� ; :;
. ..: ....... I 7 / 4 6 �� II ��� 16 / Q
� �.�Y' ...., . �T�RM� I �\�� �'� �\BLK 2 .'�c`.:. ,5 � STORM � SEWEIR�LK. 3/ �n [� O , W
' �����e I I SEWER � ��� ;�:;:.:::. � � qB � �.:::::: ::.,::., � �
�:� ::> :.:.:::.::.::.::::.: ,� $
.�,} --=--de S/ � _� �:�`''��::�:t � cq� - ------ -- — - ;
i �: . �2.
. . � -- -..--
::: �
�. � �':: . � N MH / . C9 33 J3• ----- —
=\\ �, n ':�. \ / ° Z W �
-----;;w`? MH �5 RCP ' � �i< � H �. 12 ? Q ;� ,
� / � oa ,
• / M /� ,' �3� \ MH � � ' '
B J / �`S i 'iii:+r,p�rr� � p � (_ � tl !+ 2 W
j+} II r� I .. tV.:t:t�{::.'.• � O M .•tlhY ,N 4: NJ,�' -�
{ .~ l :
�,/ �� �;: ':l':::::::t.� :�i' '.�.t
s:: , �MI Np j ;' �J� �. �. �� °� �� � :., .:.:::::::::::. M .., . .. . :. : ������ �`Y:�
� US — . � .::r� ---
/ . M
- —1_ T — -
a s
�..,:
- ,
� !
/ 6
D _
= R .:.;.
}:., �'OI�� �+ , / . , �E � ,�s � ,� , � � _ $ ;;
< c l• �fRe � / � ' . �^�.s'_ MH '� , . ... qyn � ir '° W —
. . . . . .. -_.2.:"_. �,.'j .._.�. � �
. . \ iy r } „ :
. _ _ . � - � , :., - -. -
, . - : _ _ --�_,,,._ _- U, _ _ .. . � \ � _ _ _ .
� � . I. I, EVE�GREEN
•. -- --: - I s e T%� e ra '- KNOLI :�
, _ _. � _ .
- _- -
.
.: �j
/ i E -B�TIJMI OUS �,TREE S �ON CU � B �U T
33� DRIVING ' ' ' / / ��, � I ' I� � I �� ; ' � •� �
/ � , z::.� \ BLK. 1 � �
SURFACE 9 io i� �z � e is � zo ii zz z� ,;..r �'
I / / / : �� I I 1 \ / ,s �� / 1 I I I %' : �A� $yyp
B
:,:.
.:,:...: .:.:.,.:
�::�
C. :nv •y.; 'Q
: Vt
:.\. � .: f:. : h:` • t•: . f.:•
i iN:. :.\..
.:\:•
.'.\'.'
�
�' 1' •.•� 11�t' 8
:'N.'.'.•..
•:?:�'•::: r}: r �:ti:{... r.4:}::i:}:{•?}:{•}}:; .; : }{� ;{:;:$i: }:.•}:ii•'r:.......::� ti�r}:titim:� :�.
,; ,y . .
r:i�:�titi?..:: ::•,:;:ti::::i:}:{}•: •:titi �:ii:ti},':;:{•,:;:•}:;:•,';:ti�:ti�i:�:i}:•:}•i:• ti:�.
:>:•: .� ::::::............. :.�:. ;:::.}'.:::t:�{.y.; :•{:....:,.... .........:............ .�:::::....: •:: •:::..; ..: . :•.::: •:: •. •.:::: �•:.:: •::....;; .
•� �: MH .............. ,
...................................... .::.::.... :•::•::::.::::::.:
..................... ............ . .............,:::::.::::
.::. .............:..:...::.:.::.........
......... .........: ............... .....�.......r:::.�:: ...............::.............:.�.•::::::: ::• ::• :•.�:::: .� ......... ....:..... ... :::� :• •.. . .
.; . ................... ..... ...................n.ir............ ................fr..........
. y;.� :_.T:.� ... ....................�..................::::::::::.
.....� ...........::::::: :v:.�::::::::::::.�:._..........n.....ti..............n.........r.............r........... ......:::::::. • . '. ;;}; :.:?
•::. �
........................................ ...........�::::::�:.::x:: �.....� -- _' __
. -- f�_'.• � ' . .
,-�� .. - _ ` .
::;i fV �1`' � i
b, � �
- C� ,' Q'� `` �� , � .
H � 'i � i':; �p.;' �, i
�..�-.1 ; o •�•!� l �y � . . PArt - .
J GOI� COURSE
;%'f, ��;'
_ . . �'�C� � , . ' �
. � i ^` q J
. MH , ,,
� ��Ci� > � � . �y � -,. :� . . � i � � . . . - i;,.. � _ � . .
: � ( , i
r r �.�v�o j , _
�, N �� 1,.l. � . i
;
.:.: • �
.; :.
:•:..
.; : . � ,; „
:.•.
>:;:: - . _ _ - _ - - - - ' SCALE
._._ — ..
- - - - - �:;t — _ - -- - _ — -- -- . -- — - — - - --- —� ----- — — - ---- - — - — — - --- � ,
,� r� � ,Y,�}C �� � RTN �.
.;: '�---.,�;?,-'_�-�--- - •- - � • � • - ;—__EXIST. STORM BACHELOR AVENUE _ _ __ __ �
, ��= _ — � �
`•r : ;;�};:it�r;: • . ..::, I ��= IOC
•.•\';:.�;:.'j' 1t.'.�l�� .'lJ.::;�:J:l
.... •' � i F . /
' �i h I ; � �. /
�o��; � j 69B �66' ; FEASIBIUTY REPORT
�Q��• � � �zq FEDEL�
�0�� _._ _�... __. ._ /96 � „R ,s9 9ATT1] „e --- �EapE�—.-- � - EVERGREEN KNOLL ADDITION
���t W�L( NF�NCNE FS[I� "--'--' JCNN40N W �20 116 � )17 100 70�
_' ' _
, ,t 2�AOJMO�k9M1 WESSEI N�HM LIONfTTI 84UV�NN ��
y J'; Z
� JOB No. 8313 IMP. PROJ. 4
,—� � _ '
a � - - - -- , v�
� � f =- � : _,�;=, ` �• " , �F�,,. g � � ' ' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
w EXiSTING __- ----- `� '. � ! y�r � 750 Soulh Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Iviinnesot:
STORM ` �er�c _ �'
• I kpBHIN ... O . �
��' � � Scheme � B' 5HEET NO
\ ,ji � 9 \ , Z
� �. � q. �� q
il 33'
� ._ - _ __ _ _ ' _ ._ _' _. . _-_. _'____.
�
' W W
ir � �
w- U,w �
---- - - ----
::�';,. �;:a.
; �:: ::� . ;'>•,
� „ • ;�
.,::.1: •: .
z - � �y, .
� r�••�
'_ "' _- ,_'__._' �-+'•�• _ -
_ - - . _.. �._
Y :::;� 4��
d :;�:
� • . .. � ::::
�t••
_ _ _ _ . .._-_-___.-_ _ �.h
i'1[1 7� . •• � 1 I
�_�
} :; 160
�f Wt ERIO MC GONN : l[NIS 8 I 9
M'FNtWORTH PARM
__ _ --- � WENTWORTH AVENUE CTY. RD. 8
--- — -�
� � � I �� �..� I 691
� I � I SCNNMrR- --
��0 73� l30 �� I� I ..
NLINGNEII IUII[R 2�EMER �� I ----
�12� 120 lifi .
REOD�Nfr UEGIEP I lUf.iO
�--�--�^- � i � il __ _ _ __ : �R4�N y W
'�Jp 7 I10 '� . � 7 ��
�~ I I --- ---
/ . - . _ _.. _ _� ( �
� I �; r � � W
� :;; � � � � pQ R g
�%i ..}ti: ;intt: v: r::.v::::::: tt::::: :r:.v.v�a� : nt : : u: {::.}t . r:{ • :: r{ :•: r.�r:: • •t.; ��; :•r,.:�r: .,^.^. r: a•{{. .:.�t vR?� }.. , 1 1 „�
::::
•:.�va:•v:x:::..... ..{.{.. ::t•.�:.:.;:.:::;•.:::f.}•:h;.�. :•.�. � �
..n::•.v::: :•nv:: :•:: •�: •:.�•::: ••:x : -- o
�::: !:::::A •7::. Y. :::r.. � .............. • � — ' _ __' . ...___
... ............... . .:.......�............. __ _ _ .. .
.. .......i..:'\h•It.......�.,.......y:llJf::::�•.•l.•:N:::::..t1V:{.'h.'tIJIt.Yhl•J:. fllt ......................::...�..... :':.:'.\•..VQ• :.f:.� � _-
�✓ .: .� ltY•:.:'.'.'��'i:... ..��V::i::•.:.�::.�:...........•.....•..•. ...�.......•.... .......•..•.. . i!!i.':: f '• � � — _
L,L , �..........
; :;:};Ct ; . �:
. . .................. ..... . ..... �. � •:: ::4i:� � ; •i
'•i?:: • ::::.:.... .:::...::.
W � � � � -- -- \ I i z �..3 � o
�. � I Z � , � 4 ,�. � � ::�;� �6 � � � o
� /6 C! ` ��S \ I I BLK. 3 �" � �; y`,
I BLK. 2 \ � O ,
� � � � 5 � �,`' � � ="�. I � � ;
'�
'^ ..
, �, ;. :, aB ;
CB ::..'
: .:
. ., jj
. •.::
.
v � ( I �B �Q- \ .N� �;} \ C� ----------'------'—._.._-----'- 33 33; 8
..
:;
..
:.:t:::v: ...
. :..... .
•: v:::::•::- :�:
� / �'� 4
s_T�� --- �. .
— T� ���_ J� ' MH � c� � �
;'.: � \ ,� Z w
U ' �
m _ _- - - t�, � �Z .� .:•'. � H c� IZ � > � „ -
—�___ MN � I _ '•: " 'G � � � o �
O 15 RCP �' � �3�..';: � MH t^ o �" �;
= Z � /s �,�''_'' .':�'. � �/ B � � I S" : ,: / ' � �
U / t:;it't�;.?rnR.;y : (� 17 %•.�}vx :::::::: ::::::: � :: nr:H:.; :: n;{.}v,•ik �
� � M :;.r�:l';: � •.:;•:•.�: , :;i� -- - _ _- - -. ----
..•. . ... �
.-- - -� —4 ' / / � 6 I � :�t
� - � , � ,5� \ �, � � $ :::Y
: Z .:�: � ��?�
: O m �..., MH �� Mt� Z / }�s" - �
♦ z / / / :�' I 'I5 i � m :� / I EVER�REEN I KNOL� $'�:;s _ - - ---
r --C�Y �- -- l I I . . , � � f --- , :r
'_ " _ ..... %�.: � \ � � :.:Y( n �
_ . . . _. . - . .. - ._'_ _.__ S 6 / � / 8 y \ � ���
33� DRIVING � ' I / STO,RM SEWERS 9 I,o BITu,MIN0,�1S \ B�K /STREE�T�S �' a�U�B � o �R2z � z3 ,�:,% -� `
SURFACE ::t I � / ::�` I I I � � � �I / .I. .. I I .... I ..... .. '� ';y' � S
i� ,:•:;:. �
•:,..�:::::::::
:::,
•:,.•. �•,:: _
:.��: --- ---
•,•: .:x•. `•`{: --------
:•;•. . . ....... .,+•:
•:�:. ................. ... .
;.; : �• ..
. ................... . .........,....... ..............::••:•:::.............:::.,......;....;................... .............,.. .:.:.,,.�.�....... ,......................,.. . ::::::.�::::•::::::•:•::... . . .......
• :::::::: ::.: ...... ...........
........... .......... ................... ................. .....•::.�:....:, :�:::::::•:::.�::::::::::....: .............. . ......;.................;...,....::.;:
. • . . .......•...•...•.•. ...•1 .�.•.....•..... . . • . •.....•.........•...•......• ...........•. ....• ..•.......•.
}. . ....•....• . .•. . .••........••. ...........1.•.•.•...1.....•...... ... •............{..• •.••. ...•...•••......•.••.•....IN :::::..:....... ............L .• •. ...•............�...•. 1.�!
.. ...........••..•..•.......•....• .....•...•........... h...•.1....... .......
.. C.B ..........t... . ....................................n...�................ ..:::::::•::::::.�•..................r:::::::rr.•::::::::::::::::::............ ::::::::•::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :�::::::::::::::..... .�
�. � ......... .. ......... ............. 1. ..... . . ........................................�..... � 'r
0
.::• MH c:•:::::,::>::�::� :::::::::::::::::::::...............r......... ....... .....
3 �'": _�� �� '
N cwn �°�_: : . . - , , -- _ .
� � ���'� �, ,r � � '�\ ' % ,
� � �oe-. . .. f� .
m � � L% ' � PAR ! GOL� COUR$E
s � /'�
�.
� O �`% � �i � �. / •
I"� �(/}' � / ,o J .
�B MH (/') �'��.. I � ;
N r�.°��1 � ,�'
_ ti>: �... � _ -�
'��i1 �^' �� i� . ... . . .... . . . . - " � ' """""' — NOR7M SCALE�
�_ �;;;HY�..,=•-� - -_-- _ -_ ------ --�---4- -- -- -- BACHELOR AVENUE -- -- - -- — -. � - —
�f -=;i;ri==:- ---._�_�.._....,_.._. _�.,, v======zEXIST.STORM �' �� . � I��=1O0�
I\{1�.'�/ ••.. � � ��
'�,'� .•!:�' , . I
. . ....•� . :�.':.. . I
;� ; 3olw' 6� ,66.,' FEASIBILITY REPORT
��u; N ` n� �coeii �
,o;: __�ERRET � EVERGREEN KNOLL ADDITION
r3e �re iee ee.ne r.e �Zp ne ��z �oe ro�
� W�lf NE�NCNE ESLH ---�-��------ ' J�HNSON W
'��� � TOROJNOW9N1 WFSSEL NlHN LIONFTTI BOUw�NN ��;I �OB No. 8313 IMP. 83 PROJ. 4
;��; = a ; =� MC DOTA HEICHTS
,Q;; � ___- - -- __ � � CITY OF N
ocvrt r
�. �_.,--- , a;., �^ , Q i �� 750 Sooth Plaza Drive Mendote Heights,Minnesota
EXISTING '~ _ _ '-` �� �
STORM � MOM91N , ""`�" - —` ---- � ' � � SHEET NO.
� � z Scheme A o,
�.� - g 2 4
/ I .
/ 9 �� � ... __. "
/ i� �i
/
��
Q // / I
,� ( ,
Q- �
O ''
� � �
„
,,
,,
„
„ -
LCT I WILLOW SPRING ADD.
��HP.
_ .___... _.. . _.... _.
399. i5
I
240�± CREEK RELOCATIt�N,
I �
� �.
,, -- -
,� ,
,
U� �
h'��
� �% ,
,, , ,
// �
� �
�
t� \
i,
i�
,, � 4 ,
„ �,, � �� , � � ESM,
,, ' , 1'
,, .
�l l
u , ,; �
,;� �: � �/
/� �� ' \4�-E STING
�,
-f_ �
�
,, -- � ---
I
� ��-
�--�jj- 201.9
n
�
;r
►-I :
� _
, ��. _ _ 1- .
� (
___--� �
i
�
--- -� -
; i �;.
RIP-RAP;�
MOWING �-'�
�IMITS
�
120�
�
LOT 3 (�ACANTI
WILLOW SPRING ADO
ESTABUSHED HOUSE SET8ACK5
�2�'� �.:-au �j . .- .
�
� �, . .� �. ` ERMANENT
'�! • `��VJ� ,;-',�'V .QPv �` EASEMENT I �m I
�i ,y� y', ' .'Q��G� IIMITS ��
/. ,� �\�C Q'',� y\ V�` � I 3`� I
� '� Q-:�V� � � N190 - (
� i.� ,^
� ' �,: i �. .; �
� �'�" �� C8. �-T ICuroe7h5 �
"'_"' ' ' � � i� � �\ Wo = ' _ _ _'_' _ _ _ _ __ '_fCHH"LS _ _ _ _ __ ' ' _ -iCHktl1 _' __ _ _ ' . iC d590 � T B9tl0
� _ _ .. . _ .. _ . . .. _ _ . _ . . �
f . . 1;m �
-__" O � ._..__'. .. .. . _ .� _ _' tl _ _ _ _ ' ' ' _
. _ _ .:. .' _ '_ _ ' _ _ _' '_ '. _' _ - - '_ _- . . _ _ __ - _
. f i �/ I -: ' . '._- _ _.- _ - _ � ' ' - _' _'�__. _ _. "' .. ._ .' __ . .-'-._: . _ . -... __ . . _ __ - _- .._ _ '_.-_. _ ' .-_ '_ '.'.-_ _.
_ _ . _ . . : � . :�.. . ,� __ . _ . _.
� r i •„� i CONC. C. E. G. � �. ��
r � �
'i ��i� � � �� S —� i � �— i i .�'WATER �' � i--;
I , ji �� �i :�a
� , �, , ,� � �Y
I_ ' ; / _ _ ' _ iT.00---- - ----- - z�oo s,i,� 4 s SECTION 24
� n i �--- -- - --•r- -� — --- ---^ --- - .
I _ � T.�Lt —,�— — _._-- --- —�-- — ., .
� i � SAN.�� SEWER�_
i
,/i� � MHt - -24°RC.F
� �� C.B. � -: -J. o __ _,-' _
� ' �y -- - - - -
� /I i � : - `..! -. P __ __ . _- - _ "" __ . __
' /' `' � CONC. C E. G.
��;� ,�
r�`^=;�
;�,';, -.;
,� , ,; �
, ,, , /
�`- „ ,
��
//
!(
// /q
SECTION 25
AVE(�UE
"�Nr" SCALE�
� ('i.�n
� ��° 2��
SCHEME N0. OF 3
WILLOW SPRING ADD. LOT 2- STORM
SEWER IMPROVEM�NT- John Collahan
JOB N . 8315 P –
C1�1'1' O1� R�1t�:I�'UO'I�A III�:IGII�i'ti
75f1 tinulh Pl.�in Un�c �'�4rn�l��w HciFlu,. �linnr,��ta
8
�/J` • • C ` , a
6—��-
�jl �
�—_ _- _
.. ..._.._._._. _—._
�
��-- � � m
� " Si��DEA
,�,
� ��
� > J
�
r
�
iM l9�
�.�rrFwSCr+ �EVe�.EMI�
—1 i [xisr e-wetEa—�—
_" '_"""'_""
— --E� SeH
C�
tFB
Mf. GOWN
��59
155
--;:;:::;::;;. ::;:,::: --- —
I
::::' � ���� � �� �
T�� ]a0
; LEw�S B 9
NLINGNER
... i � �o ...
6 �� ' Z � ' � Q � �- / - - ...-''.,.'
�� �� P warER�M �5 ,� 3 ��� BLK 2
� � A' N/ \ �Q-�"� \ '.� ���;
—w W w �- �
w'`.� /. _J� 3 � . 12 ; ��••
w `V
W D /� , � ��•�::�14
� �� 'SAN,� , ,�::::
I / QR w ������
\ \
WENiW�qTN FARx
� � � y ��
� �l
739 T70 �� ��
NLIEA ZIEMER
�121 720
IN4AX REODING
�
�
I
I
�
':!: •
...}.1
:: i::.
.16 . ::.I::. :.:':.: i :•.2:.: • :./::3 •:.
� s ��D.
� 1 BLK. 3/
�. �.D
` �Q�ERM
/W w
/
�� k /
4 L
�
r
mz
—� _
-- WENI'WORTN AVENUE
--�-- —
I 69J
I���... .. SCII�x1NZ
� I . __'_"'"'_
OEGIEA I ���. �UCIO
I'
I _ ___.
�
I
�
------1------ - _ __
�N
I � I �, . .
w ,, ....:::::::::::::::,�::;:::::.:::::::::.:::.::::::::::
S �, - { 7� ::::: :::::::::::: :;>.:<.::.:::,.:::.::::::: ::..�:: :�.� :.:.
31 4 / / Ew� ..:.. ;.:.:. .
: ��::::..
:..:.:
,,,... :::..
:::..
. ....... ....... ..
V' R ~ ��'����::.�..:w::.,W
-- --- — — � / / ::���•., i3 G�
� � � :����� � � \ 4 (�
-� -- � 6 / , � a ,.:�'� p ` j� � '
z � ► ��� / � � �
' BLK.' 1
,^ I / / / ::.� 9 I 10 I II , 12 \ /
��
:�::�:�
.:,•:
— ............................................................................................:;::.............. . .
� �� _____�_1,� ., � . ..... ..................
:! �f,_..=_:�• •^ ti •
�� � ��
,�
�_�l'�\ ��
�
��
/� � �
��
'1
;; "
I� 1�
I�
n1•h_____ _ __ "_ "
+i�n4r,.----I ---:=1'=='==i===-'-,---- E%isriuc e"vnrEa-I-��
W+�4i;w-- — y� — cx �nn --- --� -- ,I.--- �er.sronw
;�----._______.____.,__v_..�. �_ _--._ ------
30 I 3
w
Z
Q
J
�
�
0
�
Z
�
. ...................�
�n _ " � EVERGREEN KNOLL '
2 16 / w_w.-�.� w �r
� �� S �NIT �
CTY. RD. 8
\ � A Y �E� ( �``� ,� � -- J ----)
� � a: ,
J .r:.
..F.. � '
\ IB / 19 I. 20 I �1 22 I 23 '�7?-��. � �� �
�5 �� � � � � � :��' o W
��
�
0
8
........................................................................................................................ , / --------- --------
.Q/ �
�� ,'/
�,� -3
/'�%"
,_
PAN J GOLi fpIlRSF ���. � �
'/r
. .. . . . , i/ . � "
. . . . . . � / . . .
� . . .. _ ,/ .. �' . .
- BACHELOR AVENUE � � ' N�qT�� SCALE�
- -- — - - ---- T � �
-------- -�- -- _ - ,��-�ao�
6��+ ;�6.; FEASIBILITY REPORT
FE�«�
120 �I6 ll7 70B 10�
� EVERGREEN KNOLL ADDITION
ZDHOJNOWSNI „ESSE� �>��N ��o�ETT� A��M��„ .. ;�,� JOB No. 8313 IMP. 83 PROJ. 4
, �- .
- � Ci"I'1' 01� MCND07'A HI?1G1�11'S
�Z 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights. Minncsota
� I i
Scheme A SHEET NO.
1 °f 4
O �p
K