1996-09-17�
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
i� u �
September 17, 1996
Mayor and City Council
Kevin Batchelder, Interim City Administrator
Add On Agenda for September 17 City Council Meeting
The bid results originally indicated as available on Tuesday night are now
submitted for Council review - 7b (*). Additional information has been submitted
to item 10c (��). Item 10a (Manna Freight Building Permit Request) has been
deleted from the agenda. For Council's convenience, I have attached the Annual
Report and General Purpose Financial Statement and also the August 16, 1996
memo from Marc Mogan regarding the Bunker Hills Street Reconstruction
Feasibility Report.
3.
7b.
I_�•,�F7_r�� ��
It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda printed on purple
paper.
Exterior $�iD. �.5�. P�i.tlt Renairs � ,�I�[ Offices•
Please see attached memo.
10a. Discuss Buildina Permit Se�uest � m.�pp.� Freig�
As requested by Manna Freight representatives, this item has been
withdrawn from tonight's Council agenda. This item may return on a future
Council agenda.
10c. piscuss I�nDOT's Loao �jga program•
Please see attached State Statute Information.
KLB:kkb
�
�j
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
September 17, 1996 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption
4. Approval of August 6(previsoulsy submitted to Council), August 20 and
September 3 Minutes.
� �, -� •��.
a. Acknowledgment of the September 10 Parks and Recreation
Commission Minutes.
b. Acknowledgment of the August Treasurer's Report.
c. Approval of the 1997 County Landfill Abatement Funding Application
- RESOLUT/ON NO. 96-70
d. Denial of Variance Request - Case No. 96-25: Evans - RESOLUT/ON
NO. 96-7�.
e. Approval Resolution Accepting Work and Approving Final Payment for
Swanson's 2nd Addition - RESOLUT/ON NO. 96-72
f. Authorization to Forward Comments Regarding the Draft County
Transportation Policies to the Dakota County Board.
g. Authorization to Renew Police Liaison Contract.
h. Authorization to Retain Services of Structural Engineer.
i. Approval of SuperAmerica Group's Request for a Cigarette Sales
License.
j. Approval of SuperAmerica Group's Request for a 3.2 (On-Sale) Malt
Liquor License.
k. Approval of List of Contractors
I. Approval of List of Claims
�� � �� � �.:
. � � � i i �• �
7. Bid Awards
a. South Plaza Drive Extension (Job No. 9606, Imp. No. 96-1) -
RESOLUT/ON NO. 96-73 and Approval to Sign Change Order No. 1
b. Exterior Stain and Paint Repairs on City Offices (Bid Results available
Tuesday evening).
r
� �
a. Peace by Peace Resolution - Building Non Violent Communities -
RESOLUT/ON NO. 96-74 - Mr. James Backstrom, Dakota County
Attorney
b. 1995 Audit Presentation - Mr. Steve Liable and Ms. Elizabeth
Esslinger.
9. Hearinas
a. Curley's Valley View - Street Reconstruction Project Assessment
Hearing - RESOLUT/ON NO. 96-75 (7:45 p.m.l
b. Mendota Meadows - Public Improvements Assessments -
RESOLUT/ON NO. 96-76 (8:00 p.m.1
c. Swanson's 2nd Addition - Public Improvements Assessments -
RESOLUT/ON NO. 96-77 (8:15 p.m.l
d. Ivy Falls South - Public Improvements Assessments - RESOLUT/ON
NO. 96-78 (8: 30 p.m.l
e. Bunkers Hills Street Reconstruction - RESOLUT/ON NO. 96-79
(8:45 p.m. J
10. Unfinished and New Business
a. Discuss Building Permit Request for Manna Freight.
b. Discuss Request for Outdoor Celebration/Live Music - Mr. Larry Mack
of Ziggy's Deli and Ice Cream.
c. Discuss MnDOT's Logo Sign Program.
d. Consideration of Ordinance Change for Variances.
e. Consideration of Ordinance Change for RV Parking/Storage.
f. Schedule Workshop on Trunk Highway 149 Right-of-Way/Freeway
Road Site.
g. Reschedule November 5, 1996 Council Meeting to Convene at 8:00
p.m.
h. Reschedule the Regular December 3 Council Meeting to December 4.
t� � ., �,���•�
12. Adjou� r� to closed session to discuss labar negotiations.
Auxiliary aids for disabled persans are available upon request at least 120
hours in advance. If a notice of less #han 120 hours is received, the City of
Mendo#a Heights will make every attemp# to provide the aids, however, this
may no# be possibte on short no#�ce, Please contact City Adm�nistrat�on at
452-1$50 with reques#s.
�
Page No. 1
August 20, 1996
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, August 20, 1996
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regulaz meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota
Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota. Heights, Minnesota.
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were
present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Huber, and Smith. Councilmember Koch had notified the
Council that she would be absent.
AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption of the revised agenda
for the meeting.
Cou.ncilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
APPROVAL OF MINLTTES Councilmember Krebsbach moved approval of the minutes of the
regulaz meeting held July 16, 1996 as amended.
� Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Smith moved approval of the consent calendar for
the meeting, revised to move items 1, n and o to the regular agenda,
along with authorization for execution of any necessary documents
contained therein.
a. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the August 13, 1996 Parks
and Recreation Comxnission meeting.
b. Aclmowledgment of the Treasurer's monthly report for July.
c. Adoption of Resolution No. 96-52, "RESOLUTIN
APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR CARMEN COURT
REPLAT."
d. Approval of a request from St. Thomas Academy to operate a
motorized pontoon on Rogers Lake for the purpose of
conducting tests and obtaining lake samples subject to the time
and dates called out in their August 12, 19961etter and subject
to the classes presenting the results of the tests to the City
Council.
�
Page No. 2
August 20, 1996
e. Acknowledgment of certification of the city's 1997 Affordable
and Life Cycle Housing Opportunities Amount (Livable
Communities Act).
f. Adoption of Resolution No. 96-53, "RESOLUTION
CALLING FOR HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
CURLEYS VALLEY VIEW AND SURROUNDING
AREAS IMPROVEMENTS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 93,
PROJECT NO. 4)."
g. Adoption of Resolution No. 96-54, "RESOLITTION
CALLING FOR HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
MENDOTA MEADOWS IMPROVEMENT5
(IMPROVEMENT NO. 95, PROJECT NO. 1)."
h. Adoption of Resolution No. 96-55, "RESOLUTION
CALLING FOR HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
SWANSON'S 2''1D ADDITION IMPROVEMENTS
(IMPROVEMENT N0.95, PROJECT NO. 2)."
i. Adoption of Resolution No. 96-56, "RESOLUTION
CALLING FOR HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
IVY FALLS SOUTH ADDITION IMPROVEMENTS
(IMPROVEMENT N0.95, PROJECT NO. 3)."
j. Adoption of Resolution 96-57, "RESOLUTION
APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMNT FOR BIDS FOR
IMPROVEMENTS ON SOUTH PLAZA DRIVE.."
k. Adoption of Resolution No. 96-58, "RESOLUTION
APPOINTING 1996 ELECTION JUDGES."
1. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated August 20,
1996 and attached hereto.
m. Approval of the List of Claims dated June 4, 1996 and
totaling $465,273.70.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
PINE CREEK ESTATES Council aclrnowledged the feasibility report for proposed public
utility improvements for the Pine Creek Esta.tes subdivision.
m
Page No. 3
August 20, 1996
Civil Engineer Marc Mogan briefly reviewed the report for Council.
Mayor Mertensotto asked if the property to the north of the plat is
developable.
Mr. Mogan responded that the property is developable, but it is not
known at this time whether the properties will be platted in the
future. Responding to a question from Councilmember Krebsbach,
he sta.ted that he has not researched how many lots could be
developed in the area to which the utilities are being extended, but
that he is suggesting that the assessments be on an acreage basis.
Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption of Resolution No. 96-
59, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PETITION, ENGINEER'S
FESIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF -
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO CONSTRUCT SANITARY
SEWER, WATERMAIN, AND STORM SEWER
IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVICE PINE CREEK ESTATES AND
A PORTION OF LOT 49 OF AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 3
(IMPROVEMENT NO. 93, PROJECT NO. 1)." �
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
TOT LOT Council acknowledged a memo from Parks Project Manager
Kullander regazding a recommendation from the Pazk Commission
that Council consider authorizing the planting of four trees and re-
establishing turf in the Friendly Hills tot lot .
Councilmember Smith asked the approximate costs associated with
the recommendation.
Public Works Director Danielson responded that the trees will come
from the city tree farm so the only cost will be in staff time.
Councilmember Smith asked who maintains the lot and whether the
city has committed to maintaining it since it is not in the city's pazk
system.
Mr. Dazuelson responded that the city crews just mow the lot.
Councilmember Krebsbach mow to authorize staff to re-establish
turf and install four trees in the Friendly Hills tot lot, to be funded by
the street reconshuction fund, as recommended by the Parks and
Recreation Commission.
Page No. 4
August 20, 1996
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
PARK CIP Council acknowledged a memo from Pazks Project Manager
Kullander regarding a recommendation from the Parks and
Recreation Commission that tennis courts at the Hagstrom-King
Park not be included in the Parks Five Yeaz Capitol Improvement
Plan.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that one thing that should always be
considered is that a CIP is a guide, not carte blanche authority to
spend money.
Councilmember Smith stated that what is being discussed is possible
tennis courts at Hagstrom-King Park, and when Council was -
planning North Kensington, the residents stated that they would like
tennis courts in the area. She further stated that it was discussed that
courts had already been graded in at Hagstrom King, and the
residents understood and approved the North Kensington plan with
the understanding that the courts were planned for Hagstrom King in
the near future. She informed Council that she cannot allow the
tennis courts to be dropped from the five-year plan without notice to
the residents.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the Commission wants to evaluate the
need on a request basis and have sta.ted tha.t there are 12 city owned
courts, eight courts at Sibley and three at Visitation.
Councilmember Smith responded that her point is that a
representation was made to a very large neighborhood that they
would have localized tennis courts in a reasonable time, and she did
not think Council could just drop the courts without notice.
Staff was directed to research meeting minutes regarding
representations made to the residents during North Kensington Park
discussions.
PRESENTATION Mayor Mertensotto introduced Thomas Malchow, and presented him
with a Certificate of Excellence from the community in recognition
of his ontstanding achievement in winning the Silver Medal in the
200 Meter Butterfly event at the 1996 Summer Olympic Games.
AIR NOISE Council aclaiowledged a memo from Administrator Batchelder
regarding the Airport Relations Commission's updating of the Air
Noise Plan of Action.
Page No. 5
August 20, 1996
Administrator Batchelder introduced Commission Chair Scott Beaty
and Commission members David Olson and Ellsworth Stein, who
were present for the discussion. He explained that the purpose of the
plan is to identify priority goals and action steps the city can take.
He briefly reviewed what has been accomplished under the previous
Airport Action Plan which was developed two years ago.
Chair Beaty presented the 1996 Air Noise Plan of Action and
responded to Council questions.
Mayor Mertensotto commended the Commission and City
Administrator on their efforts.
BLTNKER HILLS Council acknowledged a feasibility report on proposed street
IMPROVEMENTS reconslxuction improvements for the Bunker Hills neighborhood. -
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the costs per lot after city
contribution could be as much as$4,850 because of the lot
configurations and sizes.
Engineer Mogan briefly reviewed the report and responded to
Council questions. He explained that as part of the project, he is
proposing the elimination of Valley Curve, between Hilltop Road
and William Lane, as it is now constructed and is recommending
that an existing alley be paved but that curb and gutter not be
installed.
Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption of Resolution No. 96-
60, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S FEASIBILITY
REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR
STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATIN
IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE THE AREA REFERRED TO AS
BUNKER HILLS INCLUDING PROPERIES IN RIDGEWOOD
PARK, SOMERSET HILS, SOMERSET HILS NO. 2, SPRING
CREEK ACRES, AND VALLEY CURVE ESTATES (JOB NO.
9514, IMPROVEMENT NO. 96 PROJECT NO. 3," with direction
to staff to send a copy of the report to affected property owners.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
TILSEN HIGHLAND HEIGHTS Council aclrnowledged a petition from 42 residents in the Tilsen
IMPROVEMENTS Highland Heights neighborhood requesting that their streets be
resurfaced. Council also acknowledged a related memo from the
City Administrator.
Page No. 6
August 20, 1996
Mr. Stan Karon, a resident of the neighborhood, stated that he has
not heazd any negative comments from anyone in the neighborhood,
and that the residents support the project. He explained that in May
he got volunteers to circulate a petition and received the signatures
of 47 people who want improvements. He further stated that he
understands that curb and gutter is the city standard and he would
support it.
Engineer Mogan stated that staff is requesting direction from
Council on where to proceed with the petition. He further stated that
there is a question of financing. He informed Council that the
project area is about the same size as Bunker Hills, but there are
many more lots in the Tilsen neighborhood, so costs would be
compazable to the Curley project.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Treasurer Shaughnessy will have to
determine if the project can be funded in 1997, and informed the
residents that Council will certainly consider the project.
It was the consensus that whether or not the project can be taken on
in 1997, it will be the next street reconstruction project to be
considered.
Council accepted the petition and directed staff to work with the
Treasurer to determine if the project can be financed in 1997 and
further directed Engineer Mogan to proceed with preparing a
feasibility report if financing is possible.
REFINANCING Council acknowledged a memo from Treasurer Shaughnessy
regarding a request from Lexington Heights Associates for an
amendment to the language in the Housing Revenue Bonds
indenture to conform with current terms as provided under FHA
rules.
Mayor Mertensotto informed Council that James Riley was present
earlier to represent Lexington Heights Associates and he had
informed Mr. Riley that if he would agree to pay all legal fees
associated with the action he did not need to be present for the
discussion. He stated that Mr. Riley has accepted Council's request
that the borrower's legal counsel provide the city with an opinion
regarding financing that that he further agreed to pay any costs
incurred by the city.
Page No. 7
August 20, 1996
Administrator Batchelder informed Council that City Attorney Hart
has informed him that this is a routine matter and that the borrower's
legal counsel should provide the opinion.
Councilmember Smith moved adoption of Resolution No. 96-61, "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF FIRST SUPLEMENTAL
INDENTURES, AMENDMENTS TO LOAN AGREEMENTS .
AND AMENDMENTS TO REGULATORY AGREEMENTS
WITH RESPECT TO THE CITY'S MULTIFAMILY HOUSING
REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS (LEXIl�GTON HEIGHTS
APARTMENT PROJECT) SERIES 1991A AND SERIES 1991B,"
as revised accordance to the conditions recommended by the City
Attorney on August 20, 1996, to amend the indenture language, with
the condition that the applicant pay for all of the city's legal fees �
associated with the matter.
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
RECESS Mayor Mertensotto called a recess at 9:58 p.m. The meeting was
reconvened at 10:06 p.m.
CASE NO. 96-18, NSP Council acknowledged a memo from Administrative Intern Hollister
regarding the NSP application for conditional use pernuts for
essential services and mining and a variance for a fence lugher than
six feet with bazbed wire. Council also aclaiowledged a letter form
NSP regazding its estimate of additional taJc revenue for the
proposed improvement project , a letter estimating the costs for
improvements proposed by the city's acoustical consultant, and a
letter from consultant William Kroll. NSP representa.tives Harold
Bagley, Joe Mansur, Dave Callahan and Sheldon Silberman were
present for the discussion.
Mayor Mertensotto sta.ted that Mr. Kroll has sent the city some
additional information on what can be done on the noise. He stated
that it is not a question any more about taking out one generator, but
rather, the Council is trying to get NSP to do something positive on
the noise that exists at the substation.
Mr. Kroll stated that since the last discussion he has visited the site,
starting with the northeast comer where the sheet piling will be. He
stated that it is noisier at that point, but there are no homes that will
be impacted. He informed Council that adding a berm to the north
will not significantly reduce noise to the houses where complaints
Page No. 8
August 20, 1996
stem, adding a wood wall will help slightly, but no further than 100
feet, and a partial solid wall near to the transformer to the north and
west would do the most overall good to the neighborhood. He
stated that the question Council should consider is what will happen
in the neighborhood once the big capacitor banks are there and begin
making noise.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that there is a community park to the
northeast which is used during the day when parents bring their
children there to play.
Mr. Kroll sta.ted that there will be a greater noise level in that corner
because of the sheet piling but the land rising to the north and east
would buffer the noise and project it up. The noise from the sheet
piling will not add to the noise to the homes to south but once the-
capacitor banks are there, there will be a different ball game.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Mr. Kroll has mentioned putting an
acoustical band on top of the sheet piling, and is saying that the
sound is being generated by the capacitors that aze being installed.
He also pointed out that Mr. Kroll had mentioned partial walls at the
corners around the transfer station. He asked if there should only be
partial walls.
Mr. Kroll responded that the capacitors will generate complaints and
increased noise levels but he has not gone into any more detail with
NSP about the band on top of the wall. He stated that partial walls
have worked well but NSP does not like them, so they suggested
solid walls - which will work. He stated that the walls could be
made of cement block or cement board with sound absorbent
product on the inside. He explained that wood is not nearly as good
as cement, but at the corners where the noise level is the most
intense is where the noise should be taken caze of as a trade off.
Responding to a question from Mayor Mertensotto, he stated that the
corner walls would need to be about 560 square feet for each of the
two transformers ( fourteen feet high by about eight to ten feet on
each leg). Regazding concern over costs (NSP estimate of $50,000
to $60,000 for sound walls), Mr. Kroll sta.ted that concrete block
would be fine if it is treated on the outside and would cost about $6
a square foot, but pilasters would also be needed because of the wind
load.
Mr. Sheldon Silberman reviewed overhead graphics identified as
follows: NSP Proposed Conditions; Transformer Sound Barrier
Plan�, Design Elements; and an overhead showing the conceptual
�
Page No. 9
August 20, 1996
location of the sound wall near the transformers. He stated that NSP
feels that Design Element 4, consisting of trees, berm, west wall
extension and transformer sound barrier, at a projected cost of
$115,000, will be successful and is the best sound reduction value
NSP can offer. He explained that the sound barrier to the north
would be installed as close as possible to the substation. He sta.ted
that NSP will not address the retaining wa11 and will not do anything
with the capacitor banks. He responded to Council questions on the
size of the transformers and how the noise is generated. He also
responded to a question from Councilmember Smith regarding new
technology that reacts in an alternate way to cycles to neutralize
sound. He stated that neither he nor Mr. Kroll believe it would be
the best application. He explained that the landscaping portion of
the design were recommended by the Planning Commission and are
a part of the original proposal which came to Council, and the
landscaping element is the same in all four of the design elements�
proposals. At the August 6 meeting, NSP had agreed to do Design
Element 2, and if the city would agree to cost sharing NSP will do
Design Element 3.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that the city cannot contribute
financing to the project.
Mr. Silberman stated that in any case, NSP does not like #3 and is
recommending #4 because NSP feels it has the best value for
everyone and it addresses the noise at the transformers which is the
real problem.
Mayor Mertensotto asked if sound measurements will be taken and
documented before and after the capacitor banks are added if
Council agrees to #4.
Mr. Silberman responded that they would, and if the readings are
higher at any of the residential sites after the banks aze installed,
NSP will take remediation measures.
Mr. Kroll responded that noisefoil would work, but that he sees no
mention of taking care of the noise from the capacitors themselves.
He explained that at the Pazker's Lake site there was a four to five
"A" decibel increase when the capacitors were on, and that is a
significant increase. With respect to element #3, he pointed out that
his original design was for cement board on the outside - a four inch
cement block wall. Regarding #4, he stated that he has no trouble
with a straight wall sound barrier but would have to see the design.
He stated that the noise level will increase where the sheet piling is
but that will only be to the northeast. He felt that the city could back
Page No. 10
August 20, 1996
off on the four foot band, although he would rather not, and that
benchmark readings must be taken so that at some future da.te,
measurements can be taken when the capacitor banks are turned on
to see the impact.
Mayor Mertensotto suggested that the city is really fighting the issue
that if NSP does something at the Mendota. Heights site it would
have to do the same elsewhere.
Mr. Silberman responded that NSP would still do #2 if Council
wants it, but would ra.ther do the sound barrier because it is much
higher value in terms of sound reduction.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that in #3, instead of doing the
partial corners Mr. Kroll is talking about a wall on all four corners.
He asked if much of the transformer noise would be dampened if-
those walls were on the north and south.
Mr. Silberman responded that all of the experts he has spoken to felt
that part walls would not have a lot of impact and that Mr. Kroll has
stated that a straight wall would be at least as effective and NSP is
willing to do that.
� Mr. Kroll stated that no one Mr. Silberman has spoken to has
� credentials in this type of design, but were sales people. He stated
that the suc foot concrete wall construction on the north and west
would work but there is a big unlrnown about the new noise from the
capacitors.
Mr. Silberman reviewed the detail of what is proposed, stating that
there would be wings on the corner walls, and that the wood walls
which already exist on the south have been proven to be effective.
Councilmember Huber stated that he walked the site outside the
fence and to the south, to the cul-de-sac, and he did not notice that
the sound was less there than it was to the north. He further stated
that he did not perceive that there was any sound attenuation to the
south from the existing wa11 and could still hear the hum from the
substation in the cul-de-sac. He informed Council that he could not
see that there was more noise in the Mendakota Estates, and that the
loudest point was walking southerly along the trail.
Mr. Kroll responded that the wall is only good if a person is close to
it because the sound goes over the top of the wall. He reviewed the
noise hot spots, and stated that the wall proposed could work very
well. He explained that partial walls aze mainly just to cover the hot
�
�
Page No. 11
August 20, 1996
spots and the noise barrier should be either very near to the source or
very near to the victims.
Responding to a question from Mayor Mertensotto, Mr. Silberman
stated that the south wall is about 50 feet from the transformer, and
the proposed wall will be about eight to ten feet from the
transformer. He stated that it is not feasible to put anything closer
on the south, as there is no room even for corners.
Councilmember Huber stated that all of the proposals that have been
discussed show nothing being done relative to noise going towards
the south. He further stated that Mr. Silberman has indicated that if
Council approves the conditional use pernut and the noise levels are
higher after the project is complete, NSP would do something about
it. He asked what would be done if the noise levels are higher to the
south. -
Mr. Silberman responded that he does not know what would be done
but he is confident that the sound level will not be increased. He
sta.ted that he does not believe grout filled posts, as recommended by
Mr. Kroll, would work but that GE is working on it for him.
Councilmember Smith stated that NSP originally estimated a
$22,000 increase for grout filled posts and the band. She stated that
$10,000 is not a huge amount of money (for the posts) and asked if
NSP would come back and install them later if NSP finds, after the
project is completed, that the capacitors do add enough sound, or if
it would be a good idea to install the posts now as a precautionary
measure.
Mr. Silberman responded that it would not be easy to do after the
project is done, but NSP does not think that it would be a significant
or effective approach and that he is not willing to say tonight that
NSP will install the posts. He stated that there are other ways that
the density of the stand could be increased and that he cannot spend
another $10,000 or more on stands unless he knows they will work.
He sta.ted that he has no data. that says there is a problem or that the
fix would work.
Councilmember Smith stated that the representations that have been
made are that the situation will improve because one of the
transformers will be removed. She suggested that Council would
prefer that the "before" readings include only two transformers.
Mr. Kroll stated that there is a question about the practicality of
filling pipes with grout but there aze two projects going on in
" Page No. 12
�v���August 20, 1996
Mendota Heights rig where pipes are being filled with grout,
and that this is very ou He explained that grout filled pipes are
used for noise shiel - eep out aircraft noise and are very
effective.
Mr. Silberman responded that one of the reasons he is confident is
that one of the transformers is being removed, and NSP is saying it
has value and that is part of what NSP is taking credit for in saying
that the project will not increase sound. He further stated that NSP's
position is that removal of the transformer will reduce sound and it
may indeed significantly reduce sound, and NSP wants the
transformer left in for the before readings. He explained that NSP's
position is that the project will not worsen the situation, but if it does
NSP will fix it.
Councilmember Huber responded that he believes Mr. Silberman-
stated that the sound will go down when the transformer comes out
but he also said that there would not be a perceptible difference. He
further stated that the impression was that the noise level would go
down by 2 decibels and it would not be increased by added
capacitors.
Mayor Mertensotto proposed that NSP do all of the Planning
Commission recommendations on berming and landscaping and that
Council agree to the schematic showing where the retaining wall
will go, and also, in order to get the approval, that NSP will commit
to filling the pipes on which the capacitor banks will be situated and
will install the four foot band on top of the sheet pile wall.
Mr. Silberman responded that those conditions are not acceptable to
NSP.
Mayor Mertensotto asked for comments from the area residents who
were present for the discussion.
Ms. Jann Blesener stated that she lives directly north of the
substation. She informed Council that her family moved in in May
of 1993 and within weeks she was writing to NSP about the noise of
the substation. She stated that when NSP met with the Planning
Commission, adding the berm was presented as a step to reduce
noise, and she would rather that NSP save the landscaping money
and spend it on the proposed $22,000 sound improvements. She
stated that the city could do the landscaping in the future but noise is
the important factor. She felt that NSP has worked hard and in good
faith, but aesthetics are not the issue - the noise is the issue. She
informed Council that her family cannot open their windows at night
Page No. 13
August 20, 1996
because of the noise, and while everyone living in the neighborhood
lmew what they would be looking at when they moved into their
home, they did not know about the noise. She sta.ted that noise is a
much higher priority than aesthetics.
Mayor Mertensotto sta.ted that the substation serves the entire east
metro area and will expand the service capabilities of NSP. He felt
that as a good corporate citizen, NSP should do whatever it can
reasonably do to reduce the noise.
Councilmember Smith agreed, but stated that if Council denies the
permit the noise will continue at an intolerable level.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the power poles that are at the site
will be shifted and there will be aesthetic changes, which is why the
Planning Commission paid attention to aesthetics. -
Mr. Frank Freedman, 906 Mendakota Court, stated that he has been
working with NSP and they have taken noise measurements (he
owns the closest home to the northwest) and working in good faith.
He informed Council that as an engineer he can sympathize with
NSP about unproven noise from the capacitor banks and is very
satisfied with the NSP proposal if they guarantee that the noise will
not increase and will take remediation efforts if it does.
Councilmember Krebsbach asked what Mr. Freedman's feeling
would be if all of the money goes to noise attenuation rather than
including landscaping.
Mr. Freedman responded that he would like to see the landscaping
as well. He stated that he lrnew what the substation looked like
when he moved in, but NSP is adding substantial height to the
substation and that affects not only the residents but also people who
use the park. He stated that he has acoustical engineering experience
and believes the walls will reduce the noise.
Mrs. Mary Black, 904 Mendakota Court, stated that she has been
very impressed with Council. She stated that someone from NSP
has made the comment at a meeting that the neighboring residents
were not present because they are not concerned, but residents were
not present because Council has been doing such a good job that
they did not feel it necessary to attend the meetings.
Mr. Lou Leichter, 909 Mendakota Court, stated that he does not
know where the sound is being measured, but most of the houses in
the neighborhood are two story structures and people like to open
�
Page No. 14
August 20, 1996
their upstairs windows at night but cannot because of the noise. He
sta.ted that when he first moved in he heard the noise, which sounded
like a bug zapper with a steady drone. He asked if the sound has
been measured at a second story level and how the proposal will
afFect the noise at the second story. ,
Mayor Mertensotto asked if the readings would be significantly
different at the second story.
Mr. Kroll responded that many noise ordinances require that noise
levels be taken at the second story because noise rises.
Mayor Mertensotto asked if Council has the authority in cases such
as this to put a moratorium in place sot hat Council can explore
options for a noise ordinance.
Acting City Attorney Michael Duffy stated that to the extent that
there is a controversy over whether the Zoning Ordinance does
address noise issues, a moratorium could be imposed.
Councilmember Huber asked, if Council did impose a moratoriu.m
and implement more stringent standards, how that would affect an
application that is under consideration.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that it becomes a question of whether the
PCA noise standard addresses noise in this situation.
Councilmember Krebsbach asked if the transformer will provide
power to Woodberry and whether the upgrading is in anticipation of
population growth in Washington County.
Mr. Silberman stated that it is not directly to serve that area, but
rather growth in the entire metro area. He stated that when the load
grows to a certain extent, adding capacitor banks in certain locations
in the metro area delays the time at which NSP must bring the
generation up in the metro azea.
Councilmember Krebsbach pointed out that Washington County is
the fastest growing county in the state and perhaps the country, and
NSP will be increasing its business in the east metro area by adding
the capacitors and is unwilling to spend $22,000 for additional noise
attenuation.
Mr. Silberman responded that NSP is not willing to spend money on
something that does not have good value.
Page No. 15
August 20, 1996
Mayor Mertensotto asked if Council is being unreasonable in asking
for the $22,000 expenditure and whether the filling of the pipes and
the acoustical band on the steel wa11 will be effective.
Mr. Kroll responded that everything that is done will help and that
Council is not being unreasonable. He stated that NSP should be a
good neighbor and bend over backwards to do the project right.
Mr. Silberman responded that he did not say the request is
unreasonable but that it is unfair to chara.cterize NSP as being
unwilling to spend the money. He stated that Mr. Kroll has said
there is little value to the band, and the sound wall at the corner of
the transformer addresses that. He further stated that NSP is
unwilling to commit to something now and asked Council to give
him time to work with GE.
Councilmember Smith stated that she understands that NSP does not
have direct experience with the technology and asked if they would
be willing to commit to improving the situation after the capacitor
bank has been built based on scientific information including second
story impact, and put up a letter of credit to assure that. She pointed
out that Council would require a letter of credit from anyone.
Mr. Kroll sta.ted that NSP could always add the band but could not
go back and do the posts. �
Councilmember smith responded that there may be other ways of
stabilizing the base, and that NSP must be comfortable with the
solution.
Mr. Kroll stated that he knows that filling the posts with grout would
solve the problem, and what is not provided for here is the matter of
quieting the noise from the capacitors. He stated that it is the
capacitors that sing.
Responding to a question from Mayor Mertensotto about how many
capacitors are being added, Mr. Kroll stated that there will be about
600 capacitors.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that the changes NSP proposes to
make are to accommodate increased capacity in business,�and if that
ability is lacated in a residential area, she feels that NSP should do
everything it can to reduce the noise impact on the neighborhood.
Mr. Silberman responded that the issue is not necessarily the money,
but that NSP does not want to commit to something that it does not
Page No. 16
August 20, 1996
know will be affective. He stated that he likes the condition that
NSP do something if there is a problem after the capacitor banks are
added.
Mayor Mertensotto moved to deny the application for mining and
conditional use permit to expand the substation.
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
Adxninistrator Batchelder informed Council that September 11 is the
deadline for the 120 day review.
Councilmember Smith stated that she did not receive a response to
the letter of credit suggestion and she would want to require a longer
letter of credit because Council does not know the affect;of the
capacitors. She stated that she would be looking for a$SO,OOO letter
of credit, and the trigger would be that the noise is worse. She -
further stated that she would prefer the benchmark measurement on
the two transformers and would also want to address the second
story noise.
Mr. Silberman responded that what Councilmember Smith is saying
is that NSP would take readings after removing the transformer,
before the capacitor banks are energized, and then after energizing,
and if the noise worsen NSP would commit to spending up to
$50,000 to solve the problem. He stated that the NSP =
representatives would have to review the proposal.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he would not consider the suggestion
because the city and NSP would be in another contest over where
the measurements aze taken, where the noise area is, etc., and there
would be a new stream of controversy.
Mr. Silberman agreed, and stated that NSP would agree to trading
the landscaping but he did not think that would be good either. He
stated that he feels the proposal that is being made by NSP takes a
positive direction in reducing noise and if the noise does increase
NSP would apply dampening to the wall.
Councilmember Smith stated that NSP's readings before hand were
not acceptable and if it is no better after the capacitor banks are
installed and the transformer is removed, nothing will have been
accomplished.
RECESS Mayor Mertensotto called a recess at 11:35 to allow Council to
consult with the city's legal counsel. The meeting was reconvened
at 11:50 p.m.
Ayes: 2 Mertensotto, Huber
Nays: Krebsbach, Smith
Page No. 17
August 20, 1996
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that there is a motion and second to
deal with to deny the conditional use and mining permits. He called
for a vote on the motion.
Motion failed.
Mayor Mertensotto stated if NSP will agree to Plan Design Element
3 for landscaping, berming and extension of the west wall, and a
sound barrier to the north according to the plan presented by Mr.
Silberman, the sound absorbing wall to be as close as possible to the
transformers, he would drop the retaining wall. He asked Mr.
Silberman for a copy of the sketches which he had reviewed for both
the full wall and the complete facility showing the wall in the north,
and stated that he would not specify how NSP should build the wall.
Mr. Silberman stated that NSP's proposal is for a pre-fab sound
absorbent material.
Mayor Mertensotto asked that the walls be brought down�at the
corners at a 45 degree angle. With respect to the capacitor banks, he
stated that he would require that NSP fill the hollow poles which
form the stxucture for the capacitor banks plus put in the four foot
sound absorbing band on the top of the steel retaining wall.
Councilmember Huber stated that he would add that if the noise is
worse, NSP will implement a remediation plan.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that he would not impose the
condition, as it would be very difficult to enforce after the project is
in, since Council cannot withdraw the permit. He stated that this is
why he will moved to approve the application under that conditions
that he sta.ted.
Councilmember Smith sta.ted that she would rather take tliis on good
faith. She stated that Council must do all it can to ensure noise
mitigation to the extent possible and that it seems to her that Council
has been talking about the same conditions in the draft resolution.
She stated that items 4 and 5 of the NSP proposed conditions do not
take care of the unlaiowns and she would be willing to forfeit
number six about maintaining the landscaping.
Mayor Mertensotto moved adoption of Resolution No. 96-62, "A
RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR AN ESSENTIAL SERVICE AND MINING, AND A
Page No. 18
August 20, 1996
VARIANCE FOR A FENCE HIGHER THAN SIX FEET WITH
BARBED WIRE FOR NORTHERN STATES POWER AT THE
ROGERS LAKE SUBSTATION," revised to require conditions
one, two, four and five of the NSP Proposed Conditions and
modification of the third condition to include a four foot noise
barrier on the top of the north fence, and that the support shucture of
the capacitor banks be modified by adding pipes filled with grout to
reduce noise.
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
With respect to the fourth condition on taking measurements,
Councilmember Smith asked if the noise measurements would
change for any reason after the 30 da.y period.
Mr. Kroll responded that Council is talking about adding the band
and wall but there is no specification on how sound absorbing the�
band will be, what NSP will measure, how they will measure the
noise, and where they will measure. '
Mr. Silberman stated that Mr. Kroll has raised the problem stated
before - NSP would be willing to accept what Council proposals if it
eliminates the fifth condition (on noise measurement), as it is too
uncleaz.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that the condition could be�dropped
with an assurance that that sound absorbing material used be the
maximum sound absorbing capacity. He asked if dropping the fifth
condition will put the motion in jeopardy. '
Councilmember Huber stated that he seconded the motion with the
fifth condition included.
Mayor Mertensotto called the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
MN/DOT AGREEMENT Council aclaiowledged a memo from Parks Project Manager
Kullander regarding a cooperative agreement with Mn/DOT on the
Dodd Road/T.H. 110 project. i
Public Works Director Danielson informed Council that IVIn/DOT
has adding modifications, so it will be spring before the project can
begin. -
Discussion on the matter was tabled. .
Page No. 19
August 20, 1996
VICTORIA TR.AIL Council acknowledged a memo from Pazks Project Manager
Kullander regarding Victoria Curve pedestrian and bicycle safety
improvements. Discussion was tabled to September 3.
EASEMENT Councilmember Smith moved adoption of Resolution No. 96-63,
"RESLUTION RESTRICTING DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 2,
BLOCK 1 SOUTHRIDGE BUSINESS CENTER 2`'1D ADDITION
AND LOT 6 BLOCK 1 MENDOTA HEIGHT INDUSTRIAL
PARK."
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
AIR NOISE Council aclaiowledged a memo from Administrator Batchelder
regarding appointment of a negotiation team for contract discussions
on prohibition of a third parallel ru.nway at MSP airport. -
Councilmember Huber moved to appoint Mayor Mertensotto,
Councilmember Smith, Administrator Batchelder and Airport
Relations Commission Chair Scott Beatty to serve as the negotiation
team for contract discussions on prohibition of a third parallel
runway.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Ayes:4 "
Nays: 0
NCD-4 Council acknowledged the draft NDC-4 budget for 1997 along with
a memo from Administrator Batchelder. Discussion was tabled to
September 3.
SUBURBAN RATE Council acknowledged a memo from Administrator Batchelder
AUTHORITY regarding membership in the Subtuban Rate Authority. It was the
consensus that Council has no interest in joining the SRA.
COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Huber informed Council that he has had a call from
an individual who watched Council discussions on airport noise and
is concerned about freeway noise. He explained that the individual
lives on the west side of I-35E, and sta.ted that the noise has
increased because of the poor driving surface. He also stated that
there are people in Bunker Hills who have made the same
comments. The individual asked what Council can do to bring the
noise issue to Mn/DOT's attention.
After brief discussion, Councilmember Huber moved to direct the
Public Works Director to write to Mn/DOT and ask them how soon
they will program an overlay between T.H. 110 and the river
�
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Page No. 20
August 20, 1996
because noise conditions have deteriorated and Council is receiving
complaints.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council,
Councilmember Krebsbach moved that the meeting be adjourned to
the August 21 budget workshop.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 12:15 o'clock A.M.
ATTEST:
Chazles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
`
Page No. 1
September 3, 1996
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF A�IINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, September 3, 1996
Pursuant to due call and notice thereo� the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota
Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights,lVfinnesota.
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:35 o'clock P.M. The following members were
present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Huber, Koch, and Krebsbach. Councilmember Smith
entered the meeting at 9:45 p.m.
AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption of the revised meeting
agenda, further revised to move item 8f, CAO Review: Bifulk-1936
Glen Hill Road, to the first item under Unfinished and New Business
and to move item 8g, 4 topics regarding 1997 Preliminary Budget and
Tax Levy, to follow item 8j under Unfinished and New Business.
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
. Nays: 0 �
APPROVAL OF NBNUTES In the absence of Councilmember Smith, approval of the minutes of the
August 6, 1996 regular meeting, was deferred to the end of the meeting
and subsequently deferred to the September 17 Council meeting.
CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Krebsbach moved approval of the consent calendax for
the meeting, amended to remove item h, Approval of Stroh CAO
Extension Request CAO 95-05, and to authorize for execution of any
necessary documents contained therein.
z a. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the August 14, 1996 Airport
Relations Commission meeting.
b. Acknowledgment of the August 1996, Building Activity Report.
c. Acknowledgment of the 7uly Fire Report.
d. Acknowledgment of the NDC4 minutes and the agenda July 24,
and August 7, 1996.
e. Acknowledgrnent of the Announcement of Citizen's 7ury on State
and Local Financing.
Page No. 2
September 3, 1996
f. Approval of Personnel Issues.
g. Approval of Exterior Trim and Apparatus Room Painting at Fire
Hall.
h. �MOVED FROM AGEND� Approval of Stroh CAO
Extension Request CAO 95-05.
Mayor Mertensotto requested that Mr. Stroh be scheduled for a
personal appearance before the Council to discuss the request.
i. Traffic Signal Update.
Approval of Requested Sign and Awning Permit.
k. Acknowledgment of Donations from Mendota Heights Animal
Hospital.
1. Adoption of Resolution No. 96-64, "RESOLiTTION
ACCEPTING PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF FEASIBII,ITY REPORT FOR STREET
RECONSTRUCTION IN TII,SENS HIGHLAND HEIGHTS,
TILSEN'S HIGHI,AND HEIGHTS PLAT 2, AND TILSENS
HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3."
m. Approval of list of contractors dated September 3, 1996 and
attached hereto.
n. Approval of list of claims dated September 3, 1996 and totaling
$252,210.76.
o. Acknowledgment of August 27, 1996 Planning Commission
Meeting I�nutes.
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
PUBLIC COMIV�NTS Cynthia Schanno, 788 Monet Court, appeared before the Council on
behalf of herself and 13 other homeowners in the Mendota Meadows
development. She stated that for the public record, the homeowners
are challenging the developer with regard to landscaping and common
area problems. She described the homeowners' concerns and attempts
to deal with the contractor.
Page No. 3
September 3, 1996
Mayor Mertensbtto explained that the City has no authority to settle
such difficulties between the homeowners and the developer.
However, he requested that appropriate City staff/departments work
with the homeowners and the developer to mediate a resolution of the
concerns and report back to the Council at its September 17 meeting.
PRESENTATIONS Recreation Programmer Chris Esser presented a report �on the Fifth
Annual Celebrate Mendota Heights Parks! event held at Mendakota
Park on August 24, 1996. The work and dedication of the committee
members, volunteers, sponsors, and contributors from throughout the
City were recognized. Mr. Esser especially acknowledged the effective
contributions of Mary Weisenburger, Rhonda Burling, and Leslie
Strom.
On behalf of the Council and the City, Mayor Mertensotto expressed
thanks and appreciation for the coordinated efforts of the volunteers
that resulted in a well-organized and successful celebration.
Marilyn Engebretson, representing the League of Women Voters,
presented the City with a Certificate of Appreciation for its continued �
support of the League by providing meeting space for the League's
activities.
Mayor Mertensotto accepted the Certificate on behalf of the City.
CAO REV�W, BIFULK The Council acknowledged Administrative Intern Hollister's memo
regarding the Critical Area Site Plan and application of Phil Bifulk,
1936 Glen H'ill, for construction of a single family home on a vacant lot
on the corner of Culligan and Glen Hill. A completed application is on
file, the plans submitted conform to the Critical Area Ordinance, and
staff recommends that approval of the Critical Area Site Plan be
granted to the applicant in accordance with Ordinance No. 175.
Mr. Jim Corrigan, the builder representing Mr. Bifulk, stated the final
detail elevation, landscape and site plans for the single family home
have been submitted and discussed with the staff. Approval of the
critical area site plan is requested so that construction may begin
shortly.
During brief discussion, the Council noted no variances are required
and setbacks in the critical area are well within the established
guidelines.
Page No. 4
September 3, 1996
Councilmember Krebsbach moved to approve the Critical Area Site
Plan submitted by Phil Bifulk, for construction of a single family home
at 193 6 Glen Hill.
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
CASE NO. 96-26, BECK:II�IANN Council acknowledged Administrative Intern Hollister's August 28,
1996 memorandum detailing the Planning Commission's review and
public hearing conducted to consider the variance application, Case No.
96-26, of Mr. Paul Beclanann. The applicant requests an 8' variance
from the maximum height requirements to construct a 33' radio tower
structure in the rear yard of his residence at 1882 South Lane. This
� tower will allow an unobstructed view of the satellite horizon to engage
in amateur radio communication activities.
The minutes of the Planning Commission's August 17 meeting were
also available for the Council's information. The Commission, on a
vote of 5-1 recommends denial of the application because undue
hardship was not esta.blished, because of adverse impact on the health,
safety and general welfare of the community, and because approval
would be contrary to the purpose and intent of the applicable zoning
ordinance.
� Mr. Beckmann distributed-and read his documentation, using visual
aids, prepared to address the issues raised by the Planning Commission
and the public, including obtrusiveness, health and safety, interference,
and reasonable accommodation. He described the variance request and
the purpose of the antenna support structure.
Mr. Beckmann reviewed his qualifications and licensing as a radio
operator. He pointed out that the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) governs and monitors activities of radio operators.
In addition, FCC Memorandum and Order PRB-1 recognize the
amateur radio service as being in the national interest and preempts
state and local regulations that do not reasonably accommodate the
communication needs of the amateur. Mr. Beckmann requested
approval of the variance to accommodate the requuements of his
communications mode.
It was pointed out that because the Planning Commission's minutes
were received by Council today, the members have only made a cursory
review of the Commission's findings. Therefore, during the applicant's
presentation and subsequent discussion, the Council's review consisted
of questions and fact-finding for information purposes.
Page No. 5
September 3, 1996
Mr. Beckmann responded to questions and concerns from the
Councilmembers, provided clarifications, detailed descriptions and
visual depictions of the support structure, the antenna, and the
communications dish.
Mayor Mertensotto inquired how long Mr. Beckman had lived in his
home and whether he was aware of the height limitation when he
planned and constructed his home. Mr. Beckman responded eight
yeats and that he was aware of the height limitations when he built his
home. Mayor Mertensotto inquired how could there be a hardship of
the house shielding the antenna from satellites, that the house was
creating the hardship and the applicant was aware of the height
limita.tions when the house was built. Mr. Beckman responded it could
be considered a practical difficulty.
Mr. Beckmann outlined examples of amateur radio service deemed to
be in the national and international inter�st. The location and purpose
of commercial communication antennas and towers in the City were
noted for comparative purposes. Mr. Beckmann reviewed
communications he has had with adjacent neighbors. During his
presentation, the applicant explained that his proposal represents a
considerable compromise on his part to minimize the visual impact in
the area, yet serve his needs adequately.
Councilmembers expressed concern regarding the safety of the
proposed structure. It was concluded that an independent engineering
evaluation of the structure's safety and integrity would be prudent.
Results of the review should be available to the Council before a
decision on this application can be made. �
The Councilmembers acknowledged the need for sensitivity to the
concerns of adjacent residents who object to construction of the
proposed structure in their neighborhood. The Council acknowledged
letters received from concerned residents regarding the application.
Mayor Mertensotto called for comments from the public.
Mr. and Mrs. Dennis Finn, 645 Wesley, stated they object to
construction of the antenna structure. They submitted a list of 24 other
homeowners who join them in supporting denial of the variance
request. Mr. Finn noted that while the homeowners association's
covenants do not specifically prohibit an antenna, a satellite dish is
prohibited. In the homeowners' opinion, the primary objections to the
tower are blemishment of the neighborhood landscape, interference
Page No. 6
September 3, 1996
with electronic equipment, and decrease in the market value of their
homes and property.
Mr. John Bellows, attorney, supported Mr. Beckmann's technical
description of the equipment and tower structure and the visual impact
in the area. He responded to additional questions from the
Councilmembers and reiterated the FCC's requirements related to
"reasonable accommodations" of amateur radio operators. The
consultant also refuted the alleged devaluation of property adjacent to
antenna towers, noting that data does not support the claim.
Following the extensive informational dialogue between the applicant
and the Council, the Councilmembers agreed it is necessary to defer
action on Planning Case No. 96-26, Paul Beckmann, 1882 South Lane,
Height Variance for Antenna Tower, to a future meeting date (possibly
September 17 or October 1, 1996). The Council directed the staffto
obtain an independent engineering report as described.
Councilmember Huber moved to continue until October 1, 1996 further
consideration and action on Planning Case No. 96-26.
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
CASE NO. 96-24, OLSON Council acknowledged a memorandum from Administrative Intern
Hollister regarding Planning Case No. 96-24, a request from Mr. Marc
Olson for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a detached garage on
his property at 832 Wagon Wheel Trail.
Mr. Olson explained that he intends to construct a 24' x 28', 2-1/2
vehicle garage. He described the location of the garage which will be
constructed ten feet from the side properry line. Mr. Olson stated there
will be no alterations to the existing driveway that is paved to the
properry line and understood that any extension or new driveway must
be five feet from the property line. He agrees to re-side his home in the
spring with the same colors as the new garage.
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the application
with the following conditions:
1) The new garage meet all zoning and setback requirements; and,
2) Any new driveway area be set back five feet from the property
line. '
Mayor Mertensotto called for comments from the public.
Page No. 7
September 3, 1996
No persons appeared to speak on this application.
Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption of Resolution No. 96-66,
"GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERNIIT FOR A
DETACHED GARAGE AT 832 WAGON WHEEL TRAII,."
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
CASE NO. 96-25, EVANS City Administrator Batchelder reported that Mr. Robley Evans
telephoned the City to withdraw his application, Planning Case No. 96-
25 for a three foot side yard setback variance to create a parking area
for a recreational vehicle.
Mayor Mertensotto stated the matter will be continued until a written
withdrawal is received and placed on a future Council meeting agenda.
CASE NO. 96-28, PIRKL The Council acknowledged Administrative Intern Hollister's
memorandum regarding Planning Case No. 96-28, an application from
James R. Pirkl, to divide his one acre property at 610 Callahan Place,
into two lots. A completed application is on file.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the lot division
(one dissenting vote a.nd one absent member), with the following
conditions:
1) The existing driveway be moved to be five feet from the properiy
line; and,
2) The new driveway be reviewed by City Staffto assure that the
existing significant trees are not removed or harmed by the new
driveway from Callahan Place.
The application meets ordinance requirements in all other respects.
Mr. Pirkl appeared before the Council to answer questions regarding
the lot split. He explained where he intended to construct a new
dwelling on the new lot, how it would align with the existing home, and
assured the Council that all required setbacks would be met.
This application consisted merely of a request for a division of the
current lot. However, considerable discussion took place between the
Councilmembers and the applicant regarding placement of a new
dwelling and its driveway, use of the platted roadway, access to the
cul-de-sac, setbacks, easements, right-of-ways, etc. These issues were
further complicated by the applicant's possible consideration of a
Page No. 8
September 3, 1996
further subdivision of the lots. Conclusions regarding the issues were
not made at this time, however, the discussions provided guidance for
future plans for the properry.
Council questioned what street the front of a home on Parcel B would
face and expressed concern regarding driveway access for that
residence. The Council considered granting the applicant driveway
approval that would involve vacation of City easements.
Following extensive discussion, the Council agreed to grant the
applicant a driveway permit in the specified location, to Warrior
Avenue; however, it was agreed that such approval does not establish
any front yard setbacks variances or grant any easements for future
construction on the properties. In addition, the applicant was informed
that all Code requirements must be met with respect to existing and
future driveways as well as construction of home(s). -
It was agreed that the related issues brought to the applicant's attention
during this discussion would be considered and resolved at the time
plans are submitted for a building pernut for construction on the lots. �
It was noted that a park dedication fee is payable by the applicant
before release of the approving Resolution.
Councilmember Huber moved adoption of Resolution No. 96-68,
"ALLOWING A LOT DIVISION AT 610 CALLAHAN PLACE," and
moved granting driveway approval.
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CAO REV�W, JANECEK Council acknowledged Administrative Intern Hollister's memorandum
regarding the review of critical area site plan submitted by Mr. Bob
Janecek, 1665 South Lexington Avenue.
Mr. Janecek appeared before the Council to answer questions and
provide additional information regarding work completed and in
progress, landscaping plans, and storm and ground water problems on
the property. It appears that some drainage problems may have
resulted from effects of storm water sewer projects on surrounding
properties.
The Council reviewed the landscape plan, the project, and related
issues including traffic sight lines. While substantial improvement has
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PRELII��IINNARY BUDGET
AND TAX LEVY FOR 1997
�
Page No. 9
September 3, 1996
been made, it was recommended that two additional trees be relocated
to improve the sight lines at Highway 13 for safety reasons.
The applicant was requested to consult with the Public Works Director
prior to relocation of the trees. It was noted that the amount of fill
akeady deposited exceeds the limitations; therefore, no additional fill
can be added. The Council commended Mr. 7anecek for the
improvement work completed.
Councilmember Krebsbach moved approval of the Critical Area Site
Plan submitted by Bob Janecek, 1665 South Lexington Avenue, to be
consistent with City ordinances with respect to maximum visibility and
a fill permit to exceed 100 cubic yards.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Council acknowledged Treasurer Shaughnessy's memorandum and
attached resolutions covering the City's 1997 preliminary budget and
tax levy and final tax levy for the commercial street light district.
Council's discussion centered on the added service level of a full-time,
rather than part-time, recreational director.
Speaking against the increased service, Mayor Mertensotto stated the
increased level represents a duplication of efforts provided by
community education and programs provided by other sources. In
addition, he pointed out that various new programs would be created
and offered by the City that could not be withdrawn in the future. This
would result in a permanent position and service that would increase
the City's budget needs.
Councilmember Huber supported the increased services to be provided
by a full-time position pointing out that fees charged for the programs
would cover the added cost and that additional financial burdens to
schools should be avoided.
The other Councilmembers participated in discussion of the issue.
Following extensive discussion, the Council agreed to leave the
proposed funding for a full-time recreational director in the budget
noting that a final decision can be made when the Truth-in-Lending
Hearing is held on December 3, 1996.
Page No. 10
September 3, 1996
Councilmember Huber moved approval of Resolution No. 96-
69,"ADOPTING PROPOSED BUDGET," Resolution No. 96-70,
"APPROVIl�TG TENTATIVE 1996 LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 1997,"
and Resolution No. 96-71, "APPROVIlVG FINAL 1996 TAX LEVY
FOR SPECIAL TAXIIVG DISTRICT NO. 1 COLLECTIBLE IN
1997."
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5 �
Nays: 0
VICTORIA CURVE Council acknowledged Parks Project Manager Kullander's
memorandum regarding Victoria Curve pedestrian and bicycle safety
improvements. The concept plan to construct an off-road trail from
City Hall westerly to Hunter Lane has been reviewed by the Park and
Recreation Commission.
Of several options considered, the Commission recommends
installation of widened shoulders on Victoria Curve from Lexington to
Hunter Lane and that the project be funded by the Road and Bridge
Department.
The Councilmembers discussed the recommendations for the project.
Mr. Kullander answered questions and provided further cla.rification
regarding parking, safety, and� r�ght-of-ways along the trail.
Councilmember Krebsbach moved to direct staffto prepare plans for
separated safety improvements on the north side of Victoria Curve
from City Hall to Hunter Lane as part of the Mendota Interchange
Project. '
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
HAGSTROM-KING COURTS Council acknowledged Administrative Intern Hollister's memorandum
providing background regarding installation of tennis courts at
Hagstrom-King Park.
Councilmember Smith stated that the residents in that area were
promised tennis courts and their expectation should be fulfilled.
According to information available, previous approval of the courts in
1994 was reconsidered and removed from the Capital Improvements
Plan in 1995.
The Councilmembers discussed the number and usage of tennis courts
throughout the city including those at schools.
Page No. 11
September 3, 1996
Councilmember Krebsbach moved to approve installation of tennis
courts at Hagstrom-King Park through incorporation into a 5-year plan
with funding to be provided from Parks and Recreation.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
VALLEY PARK SKI TRAIL Council acknowledged Parks Project Manager Kullander's
memorandum regarding the construction of a cross country ski trail in
Valley Park as recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission.
Following discussion, the Councilmembers concurred that they would
be amenable to adoption of this proposal and generally endorse the
concept of ski trails, but recommended that an overall plan for ski trails
be developed.
MNDOT COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENT PROJECT Council acknowledged Park Project Manager Kullander's memorandum
regarding the MnDOT Cooperative Agreement Project-Dodd Road at
Highway 110. Additional construction work related to this project and
the costs are detailed in the memorandum.
The Councilmembers discussed the staffrecommendations and
concluded that the review and public hearing requirements under the
Wetland Ordinance should not be waived.
Councilmember Smith moved to authorize staffto include trail
improvements on Dodd Road north and south of H'ighway 110 in the
final plans released for bids and to use T.I.F. funds for the original
segment and for the two additional segments.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
NDC4 1997 DRAFT BUDGET Council acknowledged the City Administrator's memorandum
regarding the 1997 draft budget submitted by the Northern Dakota
County Cable Communications Commission for Council review and
. approval. Each member city may submit objections or indicate
approval as specified under the Joint Powers Agreement. Failure to do
so is deemed a positive vote for the proposed budget.
Following brief discussion, the Council agreed to take no action on the
budget acknowledging that its decision represents approval of the
NDC4 1997 Budget.
Page No. 12
September 3, 1996
ESTABLISH MEETING DATE Mayor Mertensotto and Councilmember Smith agreed to set 8:00 a.m.;
Wednesday, September 11, 1996, for a meeting with the Metropolitan
Airport Commission to conduct contract negotiations on the third
pazallel runway, and directed staffto make the necessary arrangements.
COUNCII. COMIV�NTS
LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
Councilmember Krebsbach suggested that instructions for using cellular
phones to contact city office and services be distributed.
The Council ageed to carry-over to its next meeting a discussion of
labor negotiations.
AD70URN There being no further business to come before the Council,
Councilmember Huber moved that the meeting be adjourned.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
Transcribed by:
Arlene H. Bergfalk
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial
TIlVIE OF ADJOURNMENT: 12:50 o'clock A.M., September 4; 1996.
.
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 10, 1996
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Commission was held
on Tuesday, September 10, 1996, in the Large Conference Room at City Hall, 1101
Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to order at 8:05 PM.
The following members were present: Spicer, Libra, Linnell, Damberg, and Kleinglass.
Commissioner Norton arrived late. Commissioner Liberacki was excused from the
meeting. Also present were Recreation Programmer Chris Esser and Administrative
Intern Patrick C. Hollister. Engineering Technician Guy Kullander was excused from the
meeting.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Libra moved to approve the 7une 11, 19961VIinutes with corrections.
Commissioner Kleinglass seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
FALL AND WINTER PROGRAMS
Mr. Esser provided a review of fall and winter programs planned for l 9�6-1997. Mr.
Esser explained that some programs were already confirmed, such as a Youth Trip for
Bowling and Roller Skating, a Youth Trip to Camp Snoopy, the annual Halloween
Bonfire, the Staxlab Space Day, Ice Skating Lessons, Ski Trips to Welch Village, and the
schedule for the warming houses from November to March. Mr. Esser continued that
other ideas were still in the Concept stage, such as a Halloween Program for Youth, a
Senior Trip in November, a Winter/Holiday program for youth in December, Cross-
Country Skiing Lessons in January, and Adult Basketball and Volleyball from December
to February. Mr. Esser then asked for any feedback from the Commissioners about these
programs.
Commissioner Libra said that he liked the idea of Open Gym for Basketball and
Volleyball, but advised Mr. Esser that gym space is at a premium, and thus Mr. Esser
should reserve gym time for these programs as soon as possible.
Chairman Spicer commended Mr. Esser on the work he has done so far for Fa11 and
Winter programs.
Commissioner Linnell asked if the Ski trips could be coordinated with other cities.
�
Mr. Esser responded that yes, this was already the case, and that the trips would involve a
free ski lesson. Mr. Esser added that both West Saint Paul and South Saint Paul had
already relinquished some spaces in the trip for Mendota Heights kids.
Mr. Spicer concurred that it is a good idea to coordinate programs with other cities when
possible.
(At this point Commission Norton joined the meeting.)
Mr. Esser added that Staff had already begun discussions for the creation of an in-line
skating program with West Saint Paul that would involve youth from ages 10-14 and
would begin the last Saturday in September.
Commissioner Libra stated that he thought in-line hockey was a great idea, and that the
City could pave one or two rinks for in-line hockey use all summer long with little
expense. Commissioner Libra added that there was generally a shortage of ice time in
many communities, especially now that both girls' �and boys' hockey are so popular, and
that for example Inver Grove Heights was cunently adding ice sheets for additional
hockey play.
UPDATES
Staff provided verbal updates on the following items:
NSP Substation
Mr. Hollister explained that the City Council had approved a Conditional Use Pernut for
NSP for the Rogers Lake Substation with some additional requirements for noise
attenuation.
North Kensington Park
Mr. Hollister explained that the Concept Plan developed by Joni will be followed for
improvements to North Kensington Park. Mr. Hollister continued that the Concept Plan
includes traditional landscape plantings of trees and shrubs along the trail and street and
around the picnic/seating areas. Mr. Hollister continued that the use of native prairie
grasses recommended in the original plan has received approval of the City Council. Mr.
Hollister added that wetland plantings originally planned around the pond will be installed
in a newly constructed wetland east of the existing pond and parallel to Mendota Heights
Road (approx. 5,000 sq. ft.). Mr. Hollister stated that the Grading plan and quantities
have been completed, but that the bidding documents had not yet been completed. Mr.
Hollister concluded that construction was anticipated in the summer and/or fa11 of 1997.
Commissioner Linnell asked Mr. Hollister to ask Mr. Kullander if the "new pond" was
merely an extension of the existing pond.
2
Victoria Curve Safety Improvement
Mr. Hollister explained that the Council had directed Staf�ta prepare plans for an aff-raad
safety improvement along the north side af Victoria Curve from City Hall ta Hunter Lane.
Mr. Hollister continued that work would be done in the Spring af 1997 and would not
require Special Park Funds. Mr. Hollister added ihat the pedestrian way will be 8' in
width and start opposite the existing trail at the City Hall parking lot, "pinch" in at the
pond and move away from the road by Beth Jacob Gongregation. �
Cross-Country Ski Traiis
Nir. I3ollister e�lained ihat the Councii had directed Staff to prepare a detailed pian for
the construction of cross-country ski trails in Valley Park and stated that this design plan
should nat inctude the use of the e�sting 8' bituminous path as part of the ski loops. Mr.
Hollister added that Staff intends ta begin to develop this plan during the late fall when
vegetation has died back, Mr. Hallister added that further updates and plan details would
be provided to the Commission. Mr. Hollister cancluded that it was anticipated that some
sart of open hause ar informational meeting would be held for the residents adjacent to
the park and other interested residents.
Commissioner Norton made a motian to direct Staffto begin discussions with the Far 3
golf course to determine what conditions the galf course wauld place upon its
participation in any future cross-country ski trails.
Carnmissioner Kleiriglass seconded the mation.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
Comrnissioner Nartan cornmented that she had discussed the praposed ski trails with Mr.
Tam Gustafsan of Sibley High School, and that he had expressed a willingness to
caaperate with a future ski trail, perhaps even using it for meets.
Commissioner Libra asked Commissioner Nortaan how long a cross-country ski trail would
be.
Commissioner Norton responded that it cauld be about 3 or 5 Kilometers.
Chairman Spicer suggested that if a three ar four kilometer trail were created, it coutd be
used twice for a total of 6 or 8 kilometers. Chairman Spicer added that he felt a ski trail at
Par 3 would get a tremendous arnount of use.
Commissioner Norton commented that Staff should being pianning the open house for the
nearby residents soon if it was their intention to have ane.
Hagstrom King Tennis Courts/5-Year CIP
Mr. Hollister explained that the Council had directed that the construction of tennis courts
at Hagstrom King Park be included in the current Five Year C1P Plan. Mr. Hollister
added that plans and construction details would be provided to the commission at some
future date.
Parks Budget
Mr. Hollister explained that the Council had decided to leave the full-time Recreation
Programmer position in the budget for the time being and discuss it as part of the budget
process in December.
Commissioner Damberg suggested that the Council and the Parks and Recreation
Commission hold a joint meeting to discuss the Recreation Programmer position.
Commissioner Libra said that Mr. Esser had planned and executed many good programs
involving a broad cross-section of the community.
Commissioner Damberg stated that the Recreation Programmer position is necessary to
make maximum use of the big investment the City has made in park facilities.
Commissioner Damberg added that this is one area where the City could and should
expand.
Mr. Hollister also informed the Commission that the Council had decided to attempt to
find money to replace hockey boards from the 1996 General Fund.
Mr. Linnell commented that it may be wise to postpone replacing the hockey boards until
the rink was paved for in-lane skate hockey. Mr. Linnell also remarked that the soils may
not be good at Wentworth for in-line skating on the rink.
Snow Plowing Policy on Trails
Mr. Hollister said that the Parks and Recreation Commission had asked the Council to
designate the Valley Park trail, north of Marie Avenue, as a"no plov�' trail in 1995 so that
it could be used by cross-country skiers. Mr. Hollister added that the subject was brought
up during the Council's discussion of the Cross Country Ski Trail project and that Council
had stated that the trails must be plowed and that any ski trail development or plan should
not include the paved trails.
Chairman Spicer directed Mr. Hollister to ask Mr. Kullander if there had been any
complaints from residents regaxding this matter.
0
J
t
� Friendly Hills Tot Lot Tree Planting
Mr. Hollister explained that the Council had approved of the planting of four trees at the
Friendly Hills "tot lot" from the tree farm, and that Staiihad directed Public Works to do
so.
Celebrate Mendota Heights Parks!
Mr. Esser provided an overview of the Celebrate Mendota Heights Parks! event held in
August. Mr. Esser estimated that as many as 1000 people may have been in attendance,
and that a good time was had by all. Mr. Esser also presented a Mendota Heights T-shirt
to Mr. Kleinglass for his participation in the event as Jupiter Jump/Moonwalk Supervisor.
Mr. Esser also thanked the many volunteers who made the event possible.
Commissioner Kleinglass commended Mr. Esser on a fine job, and said that the Celebrate
Mendota Heights Parks! event was a great success.
Mr. Esser added that next years Celebrate Mendota Heights Parks! event will coincide
with the SOth anniversary of the Mendota Heights Fire Department. Mr. Esser added that
the event would take place on Saturday, August 16, 1997, and that it may feature an all-
Fire Departments Softball Tournament.
Trail on Dodd & HWY 110
Mr. Hollister explained that the Council had approved the funding of an 8' bituminous trail
on Dodd Road from Mendakota Park to Freeway Road. Mr. Hollister added that
MnDOT will participate with improvements only at the Highway 110 intersection, making
a contribution of approximately $100,000 to $150,000. Mr. Hollister added that the City
costs would be appro�mately $78,000. Mr. Hollister concluded that Special Park Funds
would not. be used for this improvement, and that work would be done in 1997.
Chairman Spicer wished to commend the City Council for this important safety measure.
Miscellaneous
Mr. Hollister stated that the trail repairs in the parks where bridges were removed should
be completed soon. Mr. Hollister added that the contract let on August 15 for $3,790.00
(estimate was $4,960) and that the Special Park Fund would pay for this work.
Mr. Hollister noted that in regards to the trail repair for the washout section along
Highway 110 west of Dodd, the drain tile will be installed and 230' of trail will be
installed. Mr. Hollister added that the contract let on August 15 for $1,660.00. NIr.
Hollister continued that the funds for this repair would come out of the Parks general
repair/project funds.
Mr. Hollister stated that the Tennis courts at Valley Park should be resurfaced within the
next week or so. Mr. Hollister added that the Contract let on August 7 for $3,485.00, and
the original budget was for $4,000. Mr. Hollister said that this would be funded under
Park Maintenance.
Mr. Hollister also informed the Commission that the Council had decided in the budget
talks not to fund Porta-Potty enclosures, concrete bleacher pads or the video-taping of
playground equipment for maintenance purposes.
Chairman Spicer stated that it might be nice to purchase one Porta-Potty enclosure and
use it in a highly visible location to see what the visual effect would be.
Commissioner Damberg stated that it was important to maintain playground equipment
both for safety and liability reasons.
Chairman Spicer asked Staff to provide an update on the purchase of a park shelter for
Wentworth at the next Parks and Recreation Commission meeting.
Commissioner Libra commented that the lack of rain this summer had been hard on the
City parks. Commissioner Libra asked Staff to provide an update on the conditions of the
City parks and measures being used to combat the drought at the next Parks and
Recreation meeting.
Commissioner Linnell added that he would like to see a yearly report on what trees were
planted by the City and in what locations. Commissioner Linnell suggested planting more
oak trees since they are native to the azea, grow quickly and will tolerate drought.
Parks Report and Police Report
The Commission had no questions on these two items.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion to adjourn made by Kleinglass and seconded by Damberg.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
The meeting adjourned at 8:55 PM.
Respec�lly Submitted,
Patrick C. Hollister
�
J• -�
ClTY QF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
TREASURER`S REPORT� AUGUST 199G
DAKOTA. INC.
Checking Account 1.05%
Savir►gs Account 2,15°la
C.D. Rep. 3.00%
Collateral - Bonds
Gov't. Guar.
CHEROKEE STATE BANK
Saving Cer#. 2121197 a�,? 3.63°l�
Collateral - Bonds
Gov't. Guar.
�aSalle Bank CD 5 '11217°IQ
FHLMC 7.23% 12/97 FBS 6.40%
FNMA 6.'i 8°l0 '[ 2199-96
FHL Mtg. Pool 8% (PRU)
FMLC 7°la Mtg. Pool {PRU} PAC
FMLC 6 1/4% Mtg. POoI (PRU)
FNMA 6°lo Pool {PRU}
FHLMC 6% Po01 @ 1q1.4375 (PRU)
FNMA {�1994 Pool} fi 1/2°l0 {PRU}
U.S. Treasury Money Mkt. (FB5)
Gov't. Securities Fund
Zero Cpn T.Bds 7.9% - 2p11 (J&M)
PRU Cov't Sec Fd
TQTA� FUNDS AVAI�AB�E
Funds Availa6le 12131195
Funds Available 8/30/95
Rates Money Market
Aug 30 Bank 2.85°l0
1ug 30 FBS 5.18%
LES:kkb
BALANCE
$109,966.43
$595.35
0.00
$110,561,78
�� i� �f� t�
�, �� ��� ��
�13,952.�9
$13,952.59
�, �� ��� ��
�� if �tf f�
�V�i�oO.��
$5Q0,008.00
��oo,oas.ao
$222,643.04
$443,022.10
$371,704.99
$�03,'[ 80.34
$216,306.75
�a��,sz2.�o
$1,041,462.48
�a,002,�70.00
$197,530.00
$A�22.00
$5,531,794.37
$7,$95,846.39
$5,268,659.63
COLLA,TERAL
�,.�i ��� ��
$6p0,000.00
Value 8-31-96 (es#�
����V�V���
$502,5p0.00
$500,000.00
$220,000.00
��so,oaa.00
$360,000.00
��7s,�oa.00
$210,Op0.00
$253,OC�0.00
$2,17'S,000.00
��,��5,000.00
$320,000.00
$�22A0
m
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
September 12, 1996 ' ,.---
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Ad tr r
� FROM: Patrick C. Hollister, Administrative Intern ��
SUBJECT: 1997 Funding Application for Community Landfill Abatement Program
Introduction
On October 1, 1996, the annual Funding Application for Mendota Heights' 1997
Recycling Program is due at Dakota County. Dakota County Landfill Abatement funding
is available to communities on a performance basis and in accordance with Dakota
County's Maximum Reimbursement Schedule. I have enclosed our proposed funding
application which needs City Council endorsement by Resolution to proceed to the
County Board for approval.
Discussion
We are requesting the maximum funding amount available to the City of Mendota Heights
in 1997. The amount we are allocated is $11,328. Unlike last year Innovation Fund
grants are not included in the Base Funding amount, but will be applied for separately.
The 1997 amount is based on a funding formula of $1.60 per household, based on 1995
estimates, with a$5,000 base amount for each community. The Metropolitan Council's
1995 household estimate for Mendota Heights is 3,955 households. There will be no
carryover of 1996 funds.
This year represents the third year of a three-year funding cycle for community landfill
abatement assistance from Dakota County. Although there are some additional
requirements that will need to be met in 1997, this is still the same performance based
funding program as in past years. Dakota County still assumes the major responsibilities
for the administration of the recycling program including the responsibilities of
reimbursing garbage haulers for recycling services, conducting promotional and
educational campaigns and coordinating commerci�ndustrial recycling.
The County will continue to fund administrative costs for salaries and mileage, and
promotional costs for the printing and distribution of one required city-wide brochure.
The work plan goals that we have outlined reflect the increased requirements of the 1996
performance goals, including additional community presentations (7 minimum),
continuation of in-house waste reduction/procurement policies, attendance at a waste
�
reduction seminar for commerciaVindustrial recycling, and provision of a written update
on waste reduction efforts.
Other work plan goals include the annual Spring Clean-Up event, participation in the
Dakota County Public Education Team (PET), attendance at monthly local solid waste
group meetings, a community wide brochure, a compost ordinance, and general promotion
and education activities for recycling and waste reduction.
Our focus in 1997 will continue to emphasize increased recycling activities for both
businesses and residences through promotion and educational activities. The program will
continue to include curbside recycling, multi-fanuly recycling and the City Hall, Fire Ha11,
and Public Works Garage in-house programs. The City of Mendota Heights also
promotes County drop-off facilities such as the Household Hazardous Waste Drop Off
Facility at Gopher Smelting in Eagan and the Empire/SMC Compost yard waste drop off
facility, also in Eagan.
The majority of the recycling budget is administrative costs for salaries and mileage to pay
for the Administrative Assistant's time in recycling activities. Other expenditures are
printing, postage and the annual clean-up event. The funding application Staff is
proposing will cover the maintenance and monitoring of our on-going recycling program
and will allow us to meet the County's increased requirements and waste abatement goals.
The Environmental Management Staff of Dakota County have a1so. asked the City to
submit our recycling bin request at this time. We are requesting 200 additional bins for
next year.
Action Required
Review the proposed 1996 County Landfill Abatement Funding Application and, if
Council so desires, pass a motion approving Resolution No. 96- , A RESOLUTION
SEEKING FUNDING FROM DAKOTA COUNTY FOR CONTINUATION OF TI-�
COMMUNITY LANDFILL ABATEMENT PROGRAM.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION SEEHING FUNDING
FROM DAKOTA COUNTY FOR CONTINUATION
OF THE COMLVTUNTTY LANDFILL ABATEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Nfinnesota State Legislature has mandated the communities in
the metropolitan area implement recycling programs in order to reduce the volume of
waste being taken for burial in landfills; and
WHEREAS, Dakota County has adopted a solid waste master plan which sets
goals and targets for the accomplishment of solid waste recycling in each community in
the County; and
WHEREAS, Dakota County provides the local communities with grant funding
for implementation and maintenance of local community recycling programs; and
WHEREAS, The City of Mendota Heights has participated faithfully and
successfully in the Community Landfill Abatement Program in 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992,
1993, 1994, 1995, and 1996 and will continue to participate in 1997.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mendota Heights that the City Council does hereby transmit the attached 1996
funding application, seeking funds in the amount of $11,328 for solid waste abatement in
1996, along with the request for 200 additional containers in Attachment B.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17th day of September,
1996.
ATTEST:
:
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
�
ATTACHMENT A
't997 COMMUNfTY V�ND�iC.0 A6ATEMENT
BA�E FUND APP�1CATiflN
CitylTownship: Menao�a Heights Date Submitted: g-�8-9�
Address: 110Z Vi.ctoxia curve program Period: 1/1/97 to 12/31/97
Contact Patrick Ce xolli.ster phone Number. 4�2-1$5Q
Note: O�cial Resolution/Proceedings (an official action from the goveming body requesting the funding
a!location or a certified capy of the o�cia! proceedings)must be attached.
!. Proposed program description, .
A. Please provide a b�ief overview of expec#ed 1997 abatement activities_
PZease see Appendix 1.
B. Single Family Program • List number of househoids served, f�equency of coAection, and materials
catlecied �if other tfia� tfiose tisted as part of #he Targe# Communify Ptagram}. Esiimate nt�mbef af
curbside tons collected from single family households.
' �stimated 3,097 units.
Collected weekly.
Materials: Newspaper, mixed paper, food cans, beverage cans, g2ass, p�astics,
used oiZ, magazines, corrugated cardboard
Expected �ons eollectedz 2,084
C. Multi Family RecyGing Program - Ust number af units served, tatal number of buildings served,
frequency of co!lectioNcoltection methods, and mat�rials coliected. Estimate riumber of curfaside toc�s
cai(ected from mulfr family househalds. '
Estimated 858 units, 63 huiZdings �an3y 3 apartznent bu.ildings)
Collected weekly
MateriaZs: Nswspaper, �ni.xed paper, faod cans, beverage cans, glass, plastics,
used o.zZ, ma_qazines, corrugated cardhaard
Expeated tons aolZected: 271
O. Describe yaur qornmuniiy's Mutti-Fami(y Focus ptan to improve mr�t6-famity recydfig opportunities in
1997. Please be specific.
At 2east one corranunity presentation will be ta either af tenants or harneawners`
assaciation, or ta a grnup of afficials representing various multi-fami.Iy
deveZop.me.nts in Mendot� Heicrhts .
�
e
�.
E. Qrop offs - List the operato�s, addresses� daysfiaurs of aperafion. and mafenats cotteeied for drop off
centers located in communiiy. Estimate expect�rf abatement tans fram drop offs,
GoodcsriZZ Easter SeaZ
Z425 Stiuth Rr�bert Street
Monday - Friday 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
Sa�urday 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Ma�er.i.als collected: Clothing and hausehold items
Expecteci abatement from drop-affs: 10.5 tans
F. Piease provide a brief description of the community's role in yard waste copection. Estimate expected
yard waste abatement tons in 1997.
Pu151i.cize back-yard composting
Pramote Caunty drop-off locations
Participate .in sensible Zawn care programs
Expected yard waste abatement: 400 tons
G. Describe your communities public educatioNpromo#ional ac�ivities fhat witi be undertaken in 1997. �
Communities must hav� a minimum of one written communicatirons must be sent to eacti hausehotd in
1997, a�d cammunities over 5�fl00 population must make a minimum of 7 presentations must be made
in 199i. Indicate in Sectian !1 {Woi1c Plan} when you wiii! partiapate in the Public Education Team.
T.n the spring: Ci�y-wide brachure at�nouncing communit� cleari-up da�, describing
residential recycZa:ng program, l.isting drap-aff opportuni�ies and promotang waste
reducti:on techniques. One page of evexy newsle�ter, published quarterly, will be
devoted to recycling. •
H, D�scribe your community's in-house recycling program and ceductian progtam.
Ci�y I�a11 has�a desk top paper recycling program with 100� participation by employees,
City Sa.11 also recycles a.tuminum cans, metal cans, newspaper, qZass and magazines as"�
do a11 other municinal buiZdings, Beverage can recycling is available in aZI Cit� parks.
tJaste reduc�ionJxec�c.Zing po2ioy adopted hy the Gi�z� Council in .Z994. EmpZa�ee
committee designed and implemented strategies including pracureinent of rec�cZed
gaper, waste reduc�ian technigues ar2d reuse practices.
1. Describe an#icipated efforts io promote implementation of paliaes the requi�e all residences to have
waste ca{tecfian service.
Mendota �tieights has aZready passed an Ordinance mandating waste col.Zection services
for a11��esidents. Enforcement zs primari,Iy b� aompZaint. A city newsle�ter in
Z997 wi1l inform residents of the Ordinance.
II. Woric Plan
s •
Dakota County witl distribute approved funding in two equal payments, provided communities meet
speafied development objectives. Provide a work plan for 1997 and list the objectives to be met
by the following dates:
o June 15
Three cQmmunity presentations
AnnuaZ community clean-up
o December 39 �
PET participation
A min.iunum of four community presentations
One corrmiunitg-wide brochure with rec�cling insert
Maintain promotion of paper fiber recycling •
Continue emplo�ee committee to rnonitor and enhance in-house waste
reduction/recgcling policy
Attend local solid waste staff group meetings
Attend commercial.�aaste management seminar
i�ritten update on waste reduction efforts as part of annual report
Consider compost ordinance
Ill. Describe the evaluation method to be used in 1997 to measure the effectiveness of you�
community's landfill abatement p�agram.
There are plans at this time to �ither:
1. Survey Mendota Heights residents through a"tear-out sheet" in
a Cit� publication or:
2. Participate in a joint effort with alI other cities in Dakota County
to issue a standardized survey throughout the county.
R
�
�
tV. Budqet - Base Fund
January 1, 1997 to December 3'i. 199?
Caun#y Cvmmunify
Share Share* TOTAL.
Administrative Costs:
Direct Salaries 6,108 3,500 9,608
Oirec# Miteage 2�� 2��
Dic•ect Memlae[ship/Trair�ing 2Q
& Subsc,riptions 2a
Consuita�t Setvices
andlor Temporary Hetp
Safiware
other � -
Promotianai Education: -
P[i�ting Cos#s 4,100 4,.Z00 .
Distribution Costs g�� ���
Advertisements
�deosJSiiiboards '
Promotianal Items
Speciat Events (Disptays,
Perfacmance fees, Etc.)
Other 7 . SQ� I,S00
TOTAL. $ 11,32$ "* 5,000 16,328
A. Base Fund Requested
irocri County'"�: � 1I.32�
* Cammunities musf comptete fhis cotumn
"* Unexpended 1997 Base Fund amoun#s may not 1� carried over to 1998.
'�"" Base �u�d Request may nat exceed that amouat shrn+m on page 2.
� - �
APPENDIX 1
* Promote increased recycling efforts in existing curbside recycling program and multi-
family program through promotional and education activities.
* Assist funding a full-time staff person, 25 percent of whose time will be devoted to
recycling and solid waste abatement activity.
* Promote waste reduction efforts in residential, commercial, and industrial solid waste
abatement prograws.
* Continue in-house City Hall, Fire Hall and Public Works Garage recycling of office
paper, newspaper, magazines and aluminum cans.
* Coordinate commerciaUindustrial recycling with Dakota County to provide technical
and educational liaison assistance to businesses.
* Participate in Dakota County's Public Education Team (PE'I�.
* Host our Third Annual Community Clean Up Day.
* Continue in-house waste reduction efforts that support City approved waste
reduction/recycling policy.
* Participate in local solid waste staff group meetings and workshops.
0
t
ATTACHMENT B
1997 COMMUNITY CANDFtL.L ABATEMENT '
CONTAINER FUNO APPLICATION
CitylTownship: Mendota Heights Date Submitted: 9'��8-g�
Address: 11p1 Victoria curve pragram Periad: 1/1/97 to 12/31/97
Mendota Hts, MN 55I18
Contact Person: Patrick C. Hollister Phone: g�2-lsso
Approval of City Administrato� ar Manager
Plsase pravide a brief overview o€ how ttzs number af requestetf caniainers was derived.
Mendata Xe.ights is a.Zmost fuZly develar�ed, and �hus the City does not �
a�ztic.inate a signif.ican� increase in �he number of xesidences nex�c yeax. .
A. Number of containers requi�ed in '1997.
200 additional
B. Ta wEzicf� address should #he con#ainers be defivered?
Cit� of Mendota Heights
I101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
C. Pravide the date(s} when cantainers should be delivered.
1st Delivery Oaie M�,-�� z.��ss7 2nd Oelivery Qate septemher .z, .t�97
i
�
CTTY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
T� T �
September 12, 1996
�
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Admi tr �
FROM: Patrick C. Hollister, Administrative Intern
SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 96-25: Robley Evans, 716 Evergreen Knolls
Discussion
Mr. and Mrs. Evans attended the August 27, 1996 meeting of the Planning Commission to
discuss their application for a 3-foot variance to the side yard requirements for a driveway
to paxk their camper within 2 feet of the east property line. Section 21.4 of the zoning
code allows outside storage of recreational equipment on one side only or the rear yard.
All driveways are required to be 5 feet from the property line.
The Evans already have a three-car garage, and thus the Planning Commission did not feel
that they had demonstrated a hardship sufficient to justify the variance. During the
Planning Commission discussion of this application, Commissioner Friel alluded to the
Planning Commission's previously proposed Ordinance amendment which would give the
Council more latitude in giving variances. (Please see the attached minutes from the
discussion of this application at the August 27 Planning Commission meeting and the
memorandum from Staffon the proposed amendment elsewhere in this agenda.)
At the August 27 meeting of the Planning Commission, the Evans indicated that they
would not be attending the September 3, 1996 meeting of the City Council because they
had interpreted the Planning Commission's recommendation of denial as an indication that
the Council would vote the same way. Staff interpreted this statement as an indication
that the Evans' had withdrawn their application, and informed the Council of this at the
September 3, 1996 meeting. The Council then directed Staffto obtain a letter from the
Evanses stating that they had withdrawn their application. Mrs. Evans has since indicated
that she would prefer that the Council vote on the application without her representation
present, even if this meant denial. Mrs. Evans apparently feels that writing a letter
withdrawing her application would be equivalent to stating that she no longer wanted the
variance, which is not the case.
Recommendation
The Planning Commission voted 6-0 (with Tilsen absent) to recommend that the Council
deny the application for a 3' variance to side yard requirements. The Commission further
found that the proposed 3' side yard setback variance for a parking area for a recreational
1
vehicle as proposed on plans on file in Planning Case No. 96-25 is not necessary to
alleviate an undue hardship or practical difficulty as specified in the Zoning Ordinance,
would have an adverse impact on the health, safety and/or general welfare of the citizens
of the community and the surrounding land, and would be adverse to the general purpose
and intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
Please see the attached materials accompanying the Evans' application.
Council Action Required
Discuss the Evans' application and then if the Council concurs with the Planning
Commission's recommendation, it should pass the attached RESOLUTION NO. 96- : A
RESOLUTION DENYING A SIDE YARD VARIANCE AT 716 EVERGREEN
KNOLLS.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION DENYING A SIDE YARD VARIANCE
AT 716 EVERGREEN KNOLLS.
WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Evans of 716 Evergreen Knolls had requested a 3' side
yard setback variance for a pazking area for a recreational vehicle as proposed on plans on
file in Planning Case No. 96-25; and
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission of the City of Mendota Heights held a
public hearing on this application at their August 27, 1996, meeting; and
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission voted 6-0 (with one member absent) on
June 25, 1996 to recommend that the City Council deny this application,
NOW, 'THEREFORE, IT IS �REBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mendota Heights that a 3' side yard setback variance for a parking area for a
recreational vehicle is hereby denied.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights that the proposed 3' side yard setback variance for a parking area for a
recreational vehicle as proposed on plans on file in Planning Case No. 96-25 is not
necessary to alleviate an undue hardship or practical difficulty as specified in the Zoning
Ordinance, would have an adverse impact on the health, safety and/or general welfare of
the citizens of the community and the surrounding land, and would be adverse to the
general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights
this 17th day of September, 1996.
ATTEST:
:�
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
09/03/96 TUE o8:39 F.�
�
CITY OF MENDQTA N�ICNTS
DAK4TA C{}U[�7Y, MiNHESQTA
PCAN�i1NC CCiMM[SS�Oi�f NIINUTES
AUGUST 27,1996
-•�� �fENDOT':� HEIGHTS
T%e regutar meeting af #Yte Mendata He[ghts Planntng Gammission was hetd on
Tuesday, August 27, 9996, in ihe Cify Ha{I Council Chambers� 1'[p'[ Victoria Cucve.
ihe meeting was catled to order at T:35 o'dodc p.m. The faitowing members were
pnesent Chair Dwyer, Commissioners 6eilejs Ouggan� Friet, Ko11, and Lorberbaum_
The fotlowing member was excused: Comrnissioner Tiisen. Also present were Pubf ic
Worlcs Directot' Jim Da�ielsan, Planning Consultant Meg McMonigal, Administrative
In#em Patsick Noltis#er, artd #�ecording Secreiary Ci�eryt Waitat,
APARQVA� QF MINUTES
Commissivner fluggan moved approvai af �e Juty 23,1996 minutes wi#h
conreciions.
Commissioner Setiej seconded the mot`ron.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
ABSTAiN: 2{Chair Owyer and Gommissianer Lorberbaum)
MOTtON �CARR[ED.
CASE NO. 96-25:
EVANS -
DRIVEWAY SETBACK VARIaNCE
Cha'rr Dwyer announced the case and �eviewed ihe request of ihe applicants�
RabEey and Joan Evans� who appeared and addressed the Commissian
requesting a three foot variance to the side yard requirements fo� a driveway to
park �teir campet within twa feet of the east prapet#y line. The Evans stafed
they would be �(sa wi(ling fo instaE! a fence. They further nated they had
obtained signatures €rom eacft of the at�ected neighb�rs. Mrs: Ev�ns added that
upon a suggesiion from Commissianer Duggan, she had approached Mc. Gryc,
theic neighbor, and inquired if he wautd be witiing ta se(I them two feet af space,
however, Mr. Gryc was not interested in fhis, .
Commissioner Duggan noted #he camper c�uld be s%red in the existing fhree
stait garage, however. suggesfed another aitemative wouid be to remove par# of
09/03/96 TtiE 08:39 F3�i
-.-►-► IiENDOT� HEIGHTS �
the cuRe�t fence which wauld allow the camper to be siored in the rear yard. in
addifion, this would not require a varia�ce. Chair Owyer also noted the existing
garage is a three sta(I garage and sf�outd provide sufficient spaoe for the
camper. _
Commissioner Lorberbaum stated she ls sympathetic to the situation of the
Evans, however, she did nat feel this situatlon created a suffiaent hardship to
allow the granting of the varianoe. She noted off�ite sforage was another
altemative. Mrs. Evans commented off site storage becomes more of a financial
issue. She also commented they would need a varianoe for fhe concrete to get
around the no�theast comer of their garage. Commissioner Duggan suggested
the Evans reium with a drawing of whai ihey are requesting.
Commissioner Beilej was concemed with granting a variance. Commissioner
Fcie1 commented with respect to the har�dship requiremeni and the issue the .
Ptanning Commissioner has placed before the City Counal wifh respect to�an �
amendrrtent !o fhe ordinance whicii would permit fhe Planning Commission to
grant a variance under the circumsiances where a hardship does r�ot exist within
ihe meaning of the ordinance. To date, the City Counul has not amended the ,;
ordinance and, therefore� the Plan�ing Commission is constrained to comply
wi�h it. �
Commissioner Koll expressed concem regarding the undeveloped Ivt and the
impact this would have on a future owner.
Commfssioner Koll moved to recommend ihe Ciiy Council deny the �equesi
fot a driveway setback variance.
Commissioner Lorberbaum seconded the motion.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
MOT[ON CARRIED.
CASE NO. 96•28:
PIRKL -
�OT DIVISIOIV
Chair Dwyer announced the case and reviewed the request of the applicant,
James Piricl. Mr. Pirkl appeared and addressed the Commission requesting
approval to dvide his e�usting lot located at 610 Callaf�an Place into two lots.
Mr. Pirkl's existing lot is approximate(y ane acxe in size. He proposes dividing
the fot into two parcels, one being 23.235.9 square feet and another being
2
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
15050 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447-4739
MEMORAND UM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
Telephone Engineers
612/476-6010 Planners
612/476-8532 FAX Surveyors
Planning Commissioners of Mendota Heights
Meg J. McMonigal, City Planne��
August 27, 1996
Setback Variance for Driveway
Robley D. and Joan M. Evans
716 Evergreen Knolls
R-1
Descr�tion Of Re�uest
The Evans are requesting a 3-foot variance to the side yazd requirements for a driveway to park
their camper within 2 feet of the east property line. Section 21.4 of the zoning code allows
outside storage of recreational equipment in one side only or the rear yard; a11 driveways are
required to be five (5) feet from the property line.
�xisting Site Conditions
The Evans' lot is narrow and drops off steeply to the rear from the front of the house, making it
difficult to store the camper in the back yard or on the west side of the lot. To the east of this
property (the side where the variance is requested) is a lazge lot that could be subdivided in the
future.
Variance Criteria
Attached is the variance criteria. The variance request meets some of the criteria; there does not
appear to be any special conditions that apply to the proposed structure or land, and a variance is
not necessaty for the preservation and enjoyment of properiy.
There may be a practical hardship as there is a topograplucal reason the camper cannot be stored
in the rear yard, however there is a 3-car garage attached to the home., and the camper could also
be stored off-site. There are alternatives for storage of the camper.
An Equai Opportunity Employer
�..
Mendota Heights Planning Commission
Evans Setback Variance
August 27,1996
Page 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION.•
There is a topographicat reason that the Evans cannot stare their camper in the rear yard,
however there are alsa alternatives to store the camper in the garage or off-site. The City
Planner recommends the variance be denied; altematively it may be determined that there is a
sufficient hardship, because of the topography of the lot, to allow a variance for the driveway to
be gaved to wit2� two {2} feet af the property line.
E�:I3IBIT A: VAR�ANCE CRIT�RIA -
Beckmann Height Variance
Variance Criteria Criteria Met?
Special conditions apply to the structure or l.and in I'�o
question are peculiar to the property and do not apply
generally to other land or structures in the district,
Variance is necessary for the preservation and No
enjoyment of property.
Adequate supply of light and air will be available to Yes
adjacent property.
The congesiion of pubiic street will not be reasonabie Y�es
increased.
The danger of fire or public safety will not be Yes
increased.
Property values will not be impaired in the surrounding Yes
area.
Health, safety, comfort and morals will noi be Yes
impaired.
Variance will not merely serve as a convenience, but zs ?
necessary to alleviate undue hardship or practical
difficulty.
EVERGREEN KN4LL� 2
L/ 1
H eo�z�'�o•E •ee.ao
� :�r
^_ •�/ INM UI1� 1���1
r n ` - - c� -1 �-._- �i`
i �_ q ��\�v� i. _.�` 1_;.; ._..._..__l.'I � Il
� I :: ��: 7' ,. ;:\ � 1' � � I, •
A � �� � �° 1
�.� . � \ � �
p�T� 3 �I \\�, ' �\ � '� I
a !I �w���:
�
� � \\ `\ 1��,r,s._ ;� L-- -
� �I�M��� ._w • `2
\ � ... .... \\�... i� _�ei��s�� 1
�, . L, � � � _...�o � �
s��,1 ���+� _ • ��
��� ��' .e'' � o"����'�, � is�• ,T� � .
G
� �`r���.��� �� �� "�� 7a1��
.
DI
LOCAfIPM MM • ��
N�.1� IMN NL1� �
� 1 N �YN I•�LM
\/ / 1 �% �
s� � �
ww •liN ttM
� .t.J
. i �
c �� �c r, � � i � � � �, n r
��T nu � ��� lJ LJ LJ 1 v I ....� 1 l/ f V
i-'
i � %� ^v� I N �
� w o�ur�u� uro uriun [ucw�n
� '��[ Ilt�'N TMu1:
8 11
e �/ � i � b -7 `!
� � h �i
�/ c. � -1----, �----t-
//� %11: I���-� e"� ii� s i
� 0�{ZKNlV[Iqlltll� r r M
'MMoll� It►ADGTtlM 1[IM � IlII 1� YIIM IJ/
/••-- aw � iur
-1 ►sauiK uw ut u�tt
WaI{I �IN(IYI![ II�IGit�.
�� I� . 1lt 1lIMO 1� Il(f 1� YIIIY w O OlMOifl 1/t' t 1�' I�GI
1A101�IMt {Ill[1 lltll 41 IW K+�'��t 3Ii ►N9 IMIc{0 If
LB� ll�fl. Ut[1{ OfMIlYltl �•l.t. W. ttiYl ,
a, � � IYOIWiII 0� TM[ KAi, � p�plQ I►Ar IOMt4�t IW�
�_�''� ! � /
//� ��� .�'�'�'�'' -; � � "� � � �� \��� -�J--i " �v �i. �'� �
i � e �' A� d�� � t . � � y � �•� r,� � � � tnt• .
Q�MPO�pry�� /� ���•f'a ��1 ^ , '� —� A�;b� � NB8'2o'�E'[ 'a
� e � \ �, I� y�8 � �i� = F VEY.GRF.Ef� KC::7LL — —..--
� °� ��� i� \ \�t\ .i� :t� � •+.� � NE9•2i'JE'C ��a�t � —
i • •��i//� • 2'� '� �•r.».y.
�� i r' :� �-�i \ 80.� � �hr1;� ,� � �' ' ' , �'' • ,
= 1 1 � ei + . . .
� 1 ,:, . � \ �\� ; Z6Z ,gp• / ��s� �, �
� ��9 ` �
�/ �� �i
'��\ �� � '3' �'' �sc-`�-c� 7sa v���'� ' 'o
� � \ ` • ' tq/ �r�J^ I` �� �, : 0 UTLOT B � � r' 6 \
` �\ � I��rO ����� � � ... •��) t ` /
� :1 d� ?' /��� ;) ;' � �� r; .hl. (i ?' ' ; f) :�� >•
u
�i� �n � i� � � �!• � c� ��� n �► r� � �- i i� n i �-,
�� v �i �_ i_ /.� r� �i � i � � v �v
--` ��_,� -- �.J`_---- '=' ' `J � J ,. �' � ' � �
- N •�•s.'arc �oa�.ea - ;/ .
� � vn � �v ' i � �i i `����
. h * �.-�.,�� � � l
. �� �,� i
. ' �� � �.• " � `'.,� '. . �
�� 1 I y + � •
� � JAMES . ��LL� IN
$HEET 2' AF 4 ANFF'r
�
DATE: August 6, 1996
TO: City of Mendota. Heights Planning Commission
FROM: Robley D. & Joan M. Evans, owners
PROPERTY: 716 Evergreen Knolls
Evergreen Knolls 2nd addition, Block 2, Lot 7
RE: Setback Variances
We request a three (3) foot variance on the setback for driveways on an interior
lot, ordinance 401, section 21.4; and an eight (S) foot variance on the setback for vehicle
storage on a side yard, ordinance 401, section 4.18 (5).
We are replacing an existing asphalt driveway with concrete and would like to
extend the concrete to within 2 feet of our east lot line to park and store our pop-up
camper.
The concrete driveway variance is necessary to get the camper to the side yard
because the northeast corner of the garage is only 11 feet from the east lot line.
Due to an existing backyard fence and the slope of the side yard, parking and
storage of the camper beyond the proposed location is not practical.
Storage of the camper in tlie garage would be ideal because of Minnesota weather
eatremes, but the existing space in the third garage stall is only 16 feet 9 inches deep with
an 8 foot wide door, while the camper is 17 feet 3 inches long and 7 feet 7 inches wide.
Our station wagon is 16 feet long and the van is 18 feet. Even if all vehicles fit
conveniently into the three car garage, it leaves a great lack of storage for bikes and toys
for five children ages 2- 14, and lawnmower, snowblower and yard tools.
Thank you for your consideration.
: � � •
-,.,
�
/ ,
� � i�y o�
.�,, , j ,��iendota H�i�h�ts
APPLICATTON FOO CONSIDERATI4N
PLANNING REQUEST
Applicant Namc: GYQ
(i-ast)
Address: � 1%o LJ�t�'�
{Niamber �
QwncrName: �VQnS
(I.asc)
Addxess: � 1 �
���
Case Na. �h' �-�
i}ate of Application _ 5� � l� -`� �
Fee Paid Ss - G� �� s� �
Street I.ocation of Property in Question: 7! ''`
(State} �'zip}
�
C�P)
.
��,-« �E.�. .� , �. . _ -�r�._ ._,
_ �
:
� � � * Kr
•...., ,.
Cond'itional Usc Petmit
Couditionat Use Permit farP,U D.
Plan Appmval
Comprehensive Plan Amendmeat
X�f{li�W
Subdivision Approva�.
Wdlaads Peimit
Othcr (attach cxplanatian)
Apglicab2e City Osdinance Nunzber r'�-b 1 Seciioa 21 ,�-- ;�.���5�
Pirsen�E Zo�i�caf•Propert� � Present Use �ll�JG C.� �f�-rv� i�...� /-~�vY1 C'�
^p�� ii �, !i
PrOpOsed ZOriiIIg Qf Pt�OpClty '.,_C`! .._ P�+oPo9ec1 I1SC
I he�by deciaz�c that �li s'tatements m�ic in this nequest and on the additional
�nateri�ii a�e �t�rue • � �
. • ,���
tS' xztre of App caat) .
(R�1VF�d bj� - Tltte� :.
1101 Victaria Curve •�endota Heights,lViN • 5v118 452 � 1850
Y �
C ity o�r
,,,, j , � 1��.endo�a Heights
SIGNATIIRE3 OF C4NSENT FOR VARIANCS REQIIEBT
TtJ: The Planni.ng Commissian, City of Mendota Heights
FROM; Pragerty Owners of "'�%' �/ �'='� r,2 G� �� K-�1 t� c� 5
RE : �L 2 t il E t.313Y �-� 3r4� tc, '\JA �i A� ti.l Gt^
,
V �-l-�t-CL.� .�-i"a�.1�-C-� � �.�T�� �/'A-� i��
We the undersigned have reviewed the plans for �0��1 E�j�.,S
� : and understand the terms and
aonditions of the requested variance for 21 �JE� A-Y 5�� t�.-3A-C.��,,,
• . .
We have no objections to this request and da hereby give our
written consent and consent to waiver of public hearing.
Sincerely,
NAME (Flease Print}
�
A�,. � < 4. �_..tz.T�.(-A- �-�(Z`C�.,
C����-l�s � l�� �� �-i t�J
ft� rit w.., _� l _�i�� � �nl - �.. ��
s�- 5.� 5 AN_ G
.
�oh%� t �� r�►�:�, �Ga� 1 � c.�
(j�5 � �i � ��+'h`'-''- _
�
,./ .�..L .. ...�+ ii���i►.
� / �
r �
� � �/,�r.� �.r.�.�.Z.���..�
. .ri�l�.i r
�
ADDRESS {'INCL. LUT'�
-zs �. .�{.����, �� I Is
��17 � � U�ar�e�+ .�'d�'o1�-�
� f 1 ��1�'c,r�e� �Mo ��S'
j(,,� G�Yc C�'"
����� ��
_%J�vB �YLU 20�
,
1101 Vietoria Curve • 1Viendata Hei�hts, 1ViN • 55218 452 • 1$54
�
EVERGREEN KN4LL� 2'ND ADDITION
• LOGtTioM MM
uau t.�n w.0
. N !
1 t \ } -1 ua+ t �c+�e
� �—ni l J � J i iT �� ��i� �� �
t� ar n
MMa! ��YfN J.iW '
L� �r�
..a N 88•2T'10' E 456.E0 �� tt! �(„r� r i 1 �� 1 C� 1 / i � 1
�e�i �� 1NN iJ1�� 1��f� I�+M III�� s \� `J L� L� I V I `.� I lI I V
�_„ �,\��.� �._ . �_�....` `_.�a ._..._..._ ,l �`_. �i'_. �_,....—_.....�-'_.7, �� ' � i,l
�_ Q"I �� �_ � �, � 4 4 �-� �_ �_ `� v.._—I
� � ' � � y� � i t � �� � t � s � � � ( � 1A� ��tqWN TMUilUiT [+�EMGtT�
:I �� t�' , �. .� �,, �j � k� � c% ! '`� I
8 ��
oU�.�o� A; � �`�� ` ,�1 � 'j 1 � �� 1� ° � ,� = M� —, �. .
y ,r,y : y F I
� � � � �� j ti /� } r� #
m fl �` �i \ � J L----� � /I �,,, � • r I � N08'27'i0'E -1�...._::» ��1�
y 1 1 \\ +� y«KSil�" i��� ne • .�ar�� ��,,,,� � f i� � .+�" � 69T2 iMEAS 3 `
ij .. .1 \ . ... � fTM.. i.��S=t „�, •.... sStW�.^"�^' �� � 69i2 M3N [VfAOAlW • M � y N
1 `._ .��'. . �y -s� '�:s�y +.,� V ./�,,...-- �xaauarrmana,v �t�r ti tttt i� rtenc uo
� •-- �� \ \ ./; p.� tleb•3fi8' Y , p�. �" � .,¢}// � ►0.701MIK {la 1.9t ll�ts a+tt� « r�n
�' �.�;r•'� �,p1 ��:�• �23'� ti: f r +,� �+j'�1'{/��f/ I� YN.�{i OIMI�YIlI I�I41�0� O qpplCt 1/Y � ��� �w�
ti � �� P:'a2 hC�1'�:••'� "� �N83 �1,120T.06 ~ 9'•? '•}\,O �/ l�/� ' aWBil�ilx4 3Tttt �ttKti��l,t6 W ![�tuYNF tti ,txa !W[t0 ii
ti � �i;� �2 ,`•�ti. - d. �i � �� T � tioi ��exs. Wt[Si 6T»[tYlS! i.t.s. +�. ttx�y ,
*{y r.� ��� ,� �� _,,,ay`� ' � � ,,,,� �'{y �S +i/ / � I ' • 6tr0i[t IIOn ID�UKNt tOUm
�. F�_ "G � tYDitAlt� p iNi riA1�
�v � ,i � �.2� c Z �..,, � �: �� �' ___ ��,� ,�? ,� �� ��"', +c,� W
$� ; ' ,,�'� �� ,c�� �'" 1 �� �S �'� 1 C�,T ��.,. �� �, �; "�� �4� �" c� � � . �
� ,�� ��'���_'' � � � �� � � �a � �• ��,�,�"� �`.� � N �' �' i �
r' �,�. a�� � -; �� \ ,� /� \ .� • �� d —J--1 1 � u �, i . �
.-'/ '�`�i 3� { i � f „� �.'.�.�+ f.�',� � ` +�tp� , z3xe �
r� 6.N�y��D,Ott�$ ^ \ ! �y�+,t , f .... \ � •� _ .�.._l� � Y. I��, � x1 N88'24iJB�E '�i� �
� � � ._ -1 b bt 6 �
�12 � / � `� sr � �. J` � �y � t j ,s$ �j � �aq�,,� "� ; EVi:�:GRE�ti K.;:;i.i. � � �/
t G• r��' / ` o�.`/ �', � +ry '4�'- '-- � N�8•29'88'E 443.7t s
/ �\�', l�`% /� r q e�F � � 1 ��� q �•,"ww• ,
,��
,,,,� � �"' w`. /"' k�F /` � 1 , .. , � , _ '�,,+ / /,
Z , t Y� V .^' / �\ i Rl60 00 � / � �c-h rl : (� � ' �v GJ1�, � � � - • ' ' •' � � � , T G #/
- t ru � C '�� a.zax aga � t�,��'�y � T j � � '��.", �`�, r
(/�+� '�
� ` � � � 7 ,,, --^� c�� f� � � � .. ,� .�. �; .�,� �sa � , : � P , QaA.
wM«ft� \ i 7 / 4 '+ `Jh`J� � � ~!
�` � r � ' � ��'�I rt' C�r 1�+. k !' `a ' 8 UTl�OT 8 � ' �� ^ �_� ff >..; � ` /�
` , \ , � l��b �i�`� ,�� � � � . . V -�.,� ,{��/
:� � :� �ai , .,�`/,,� :, �� �"- \� �: f +� t: �;, 7-ha. ,: �- � « .� ��',�J
,,r� `n r r, r 1 � + c'+ �� + t l n r� r r i - , iti ` n r � r /
�� 'Iv�`�. �- `� �/j� � .> � � N� �. �) �I � � �� �� ,sf -, � �Al•
� ` _ .� �___ ____ �.J �_J �, t<�
u�w" .» � u.. •.
.—_• " ••N 89'xs'30`E I034.83 •• �` ;
�.-,�.q ���1
� 1 v i� i � - �v ' � � ii � / /`'��°��ry
. � � � �/
,X � � ����� �'� � � 1
� .� �- ; �. � � �.� ;� �r�
y A
!.' 1 � w A A ^
' . JAMES �R. NILL, INC.
SNEET 2' OF 2 8NEET$
�
CiLy of Mendata Heights
Variance Checkiist
Date: � l_G� j �'i' L
Applicant: �v�
Case No: �Z(� � �
_� Fee {$50 Residentiai, $140 Commercial}
� b. Letter of Intent
�c. Abstract Listing of owners located within 100 feet of property.
The appiicant shall submit ane signed copy of the application and the fallawing supparting
documents:
t j t� 9}" ts-J Ca � i r S
�1. Sketch plan showing all pertinent dimensions, and including the location of any
easements, having ar� influence upon the variance raquest.
✓�. Written consent and waiver of public hearing, in a form prescribed by the City, by
the owners af property within 100 feet of the boundaries of the property far whi.ch
the variance is requested, accompanied by a map indicating the location a£the
property in question and the location of property owners who have given consent,
or, lacking such consent, a Iist of names and addresses of the owners of property
within 100 feet of the bounda,cies af the property far which the variance is
requested.
� 3. If topography or e�reme grade is the basis on which the request is made, a2i
topographic contours shall be submitted.
�l� 4. Lf the application involves a cutting of a curb £or a driveway or �rading a driveway.
the applicant shall have his plan approved by the City's Public Works Director.
`
1 ►�I ►I11 • .I .Y
ul u �
September 13, 1996
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets
Swansons 2nd Addition
7ob No. 9509
Improvement No. 95, Project No. 2
M�.Y�1� � ►
The contract has been completed for the Swansons 2nd Addition project and is ready
for final payment.
Totai contract cost for this pmject was $110,263.62 not including engineering,
easements, and overhead.
M;� DTK� u lu I► I 1: Y �►
I recommend Council accept the project and approve the final payment to Kober
Excavati.ng of P1k River, Minnesota.
���� ► : .1 11: 1
If Council concurs with the recommendation, they should pass a motion adopti.ng
Resolution No. 96-_, RESOLiJTION ACCEPTING WORB AND APPROVING FINAL
PAYMENT FOR SWANSONS 2ND ADDITION (IlVIPROVEMENT NO. 95, PROJECT
NO. 2).
JED:ls
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING
FINAL PAYIV�NT FOR IlVIPROVIIVIENT NO. 95, PROJECT NO. 2
VV7HEREAS, Pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Mendota Heights
on August 7, 1995, Kober Excavating of P.lk River, Minnesota , has satisfactorily completed
the improvement of sanitary sewer extension, storm sewer extension, watermain extension,
street, curb and gutter improvements to serve the area lrnown as Swansons 2nd Addition
(Improvement No. 95, Project No. 2) in accordance with such contract.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED bu the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and
approved;and
BE IT F[JRTHER RESOLVFD that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby directed to
issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract in the amount of $6,499.02, tal�ng
the contractor's receipt in full.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 13th da.y of 5eptember 1996.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HQGHTS
August 27, 1996
I1�ia.yor, City Council and City A ��
7ames E. Danielsan, Public Works Direc
Llakota Cvuniy Transportaiion Plan - Review �
BACKGRQUND:
Dakata County is in the process of preparing a Comprehensive Transparta.tion
PolicylSystems Plan. The "System" portion af the plan will provide a review af existing
demagraphics and travel conditions, forecast the future travel demandi id8�tiflC�tio�i of ueeded
transpartatian improvements and an implementation schedule for a S-Year Capital
improvement Pragra.m (CIP).
A draft of the Transportation Plan "Policies" has been pzinted and distributed to the
cifies and townships withia the Caunty for review and comment. There are 15 sectians of
policies categoriized as fallows:
1. FinancelFuncling
2. �Ilk'•Tg�/�EI1V1I(JIIIYIE:IIt
�. ��Si�11%COIlStIUCt14Il
4. Right-of-way Acquisition
5. Functional Cla.ssification
6. Access/Mobility
7. 7urisdictianai Classificat'ron
8. Intermadalism
9.
X�.
��.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Rai:LroadslTrucks & Naviga�ion
�1
TIiLilSlt
Bikeways & Pedes#a�s
Planning/Cooperatian
Land Use
Public Participation
OperationsnvIa:intenance
A draft capy of the document is attached for your review.
The current transportation plan was prepared ia 1982. Begirming in 1990, the County
began the initial efforts to update this plan with spat policy revisions by County Board
resolution. Thoss effarts were renewed in the Fall af 1994 and will culminate with formal
County Board adoption in eazly 1997. These policies have a number of revisions that favor
the Cities, therefare some Cities who have joint projects with the County are holding off
completing those projects until these new policies are implemented. To accomrnodate those
Cities, County is attempting to have the policy changes adopted by the County Board early in
Qctober.
J .
DISCUSSION•
Staff review of this document has been accomplished by attending County sponsored
workshops, Dakota County Area City Engineer and Administrative meetings, and a personal
review. For the most part the proposed policy revisions are favorable. Based on my review
listed below are specific issues that I feel Council should be made aware of, and comments
should be made to the County requesting different policy than is proposeii:
1. Finance/Fundine:
a. Noise Abatement (See FF4 page 3)
I understand that allowable noise guidelines were established by a 1972 Minnesota. State
Statute. Many County roads could be in excess of these standards, especially the Night
Times Standards and recently some of their projects have been the subject of threatened-
lawsuits. In ttus Policy the County is addressing fundi.ng of required noise abatement
construction along County Roads. The proposed parkicipation formula is confusing. I
feel that any noise abatement conshuction required as a result of County roads should
be funded, according to the standard 55 � County/45 � City cost division.
b. T� use in funding (See FF7 and 8 page 4)
The County proposes to not allow Cities to use T'Il� or other "outside" funds as part of
their cost share. I feel that, how the City obtains its funds to participate in County
projects should be totally up to the Cities. Dakota County's opposition to City use of
7'� should not become part of their transportation policy.
c. Roadway Access Spacing (See FC3 page 19)
I feel that County access spacing guidelines should take into account consideration for
the greater access needs in high density urban areas of the County.
d. Turn backs (See 7C.1 page 24)
Criteria regarding what condition a County Road must be in prior to tum back to Cities
has not been addressed within the Policy. I feel that a policy with uniform guidelines
for turn back of County roads should be established.
e. Street Sweeping (see O/M page 60)
The County plan now provides for road sweeping "each spring". A completion goal,
and type of sweeping should be addressed. Some County roads are swept by merely
sweeping the sand off the roadway into the ditch, all streets should be swept with a
sweeper that picks up the sand for disposal at a disposai site.
: �
�
sweeper tbat picks up the sand far disposal at a disposal site.
I:�i�l Y �i�►i �i�i i-1'�� i
Review the above comments on the draft Counry Trdnsportation P1an Policies, for
acceptance, add any additional comments, determine if this is an acceptable level of review
and if it is, autharize staff to forward these comments ta the County Board for use in their
deliberations when cansidering this policy, ��
F
- x.
.:: `
� D RAFT
�TRANSPORTATION � PLAN POLICIES
DAKOTA COUNTY BOARD WORKSHOP
April 9, 1996
:a
�� � � � + ~ • � � . � � � �
This draft policy document includes proposed palicies, potentiai strategies to acc:omplish
the proposed poiicy, brief background and discussion seciions #o further explain the infent
of the proposed policy, and the existing policies from #he 9982 Transportation Policy Plan
and Counfy Board Resolu#ions. Proposed policies which are either identical to exis#i�g
Caunty policy or are minor revisions of existing County policy are in plain text. Proposed
poticies which are new or are major revisians of existing County poiicy are in shaded text.
This draft poiicy document is divided into the foilowing sections.
1.
2.
3,
4.
5.
fi.
7.
8,
9.
� o.
11.
i2.
13.
14.
15.
FinanceJFunding
Energy/Environment
Design/Constnaciion
Right-of-Way Acquisition
Funcfiona( Ciassificaiion �
AccesslMobility
Jurisdicfionai Ciassification
lnterrr�odalism
Railroads, Trucks, & Commerciat Navigation
Transit
Bikeways & Pedestrians
Planning/Goaperatian
Land Use
Public Participa#ion
Operations/Maintenance
�
• . r. . 1 .
. dti. • � ,� � v . ..
"s•!. ._. . . ,' 'i . �• •
�i
�
�
..
��
Finance/Funding
Back�round
Roadways under Countyjurisdfctfon are malntained, preserve� constructed and
reconstructed by the County Highway Departmerr� Funding for these activiiies Is
obtaJned bom a variety ofsou�rces including /oca/ properiy tax, a/ocally adminisfered
gravel tax, sYdte-aid, federal-aid�and contributions from /ocal citie�
Planning b Highways�are recommending changes in financdfunding policies from the
1982 Transportaiion Policy Plan based upon staiutory changes, requests from the ciiies,
and changes In County policy �rough County Board resolution. . ,
Statutorv Chanve� ` �r'� . �_ � � y � � '� `. , .
• National Urban Runoff Proteciion Standards (NURP) require inanagement of
stormwate� runoff associateal with road projects. (Policy FF.1- J)
• Noise Abatement coiKained in Minnesota Rules 7030.00?0. -
(expande�f �iscussio�t o� this iterrr under Environmerr# Section. (Folicy FF.4))
-�
Citv Revuested Chanves: �
• City staff requested tnat U�e County participate in storm sewer fu�ding based
upon contributing flows (Policy FF.1 C.) � �
• A policy allowfng advance funding of a project by a city or the county. (Polfcy
FF.S b6) - - � ` '
• CHy staflF agreed to fol/ow the County Jead in subtracffng any outsfde funds
received by either the city or the county from totaJ project costs prior% the
cost spli� (Policies FF.7 88J
Township Requested Chanpes
• Township o�cers asked about intersection lighting of County roads and sign
replacemertt funding. County staff has responded to this concern by revising
the Township Allotmenf policy and proposing that the fund no longer be used
for construction and instead be used to provide for intersection lighting and
sign replacemeni
Bikewavs
Present bikeway policy is proposed to be changed to include the following:
1. Construct bikeways�on both sides of all County roads, where feasible
• County current/y pays 100.Y of one bikeway on County roads on the
designafed Couniy bikeway system. Under proposal County would pay
55% of two bikeways on all County roads where feasible.
;
Proposed Poliaies:
!f will be Dakota County's PoJicy to:
FF.1 participate� for cities with population over 5,000, in 55% of the cranstruction a�d ,
re-cons#rvctiort casts of the following an cost shaced �tems on County projects:
. � ' .a Z. " • c nY . . . . �
A. roadway canstruction items as set forth in Appendix 1. �
........ ...... r,::,:..,:r :...:.::::.::,:..,..:.:;::;:,�:a:.:.,..::::::.:....:.:::::.:,.....:;�:::.�::.y.::.::::::.....,.::;.:;>;:;;:.:::r:r -
...:. ...,.�. ......
........., ........::.....,. „.......:: .,:.:.:::::: :,::::::..,..v.,..r.,.;:.;:::.,� . .... ................... - -
.::.: :• ::........... ... ... .....�...:. ,.:.::.. ,.:,:: •:: -: :••::.:..... . f . : -:::: ... .:.. :.,.;::.s: :.. : -::::: -,. .� ...:•.;:.: .:....::: :. > :.:: ,•::::.: ._:.: •: •....:::::..::.::.�..
::::.:.::::::: .... ........
. , , . .....
.,•:.:::�::.::.:<::.: ../.E•.:u::...;. . � . , ,. : . ..;.. , "r.'::�t>::::;;:;;:•>„?.'#ii�i':`•2.;?;:;;:;¢:` fi:;.3e
f:.:�rf<:<.r:: er.�a�:: e -»:::::<=::>::::._:::...�::>:.�.;>::�.r;:,.::;<:::..:::�::»:::::;=::.:<
............. fi �t � : ;� . c��cf _�. <::�.ta#e:,�nd;fecl..__- -... .... r�m1:#st�,i�'::..��:�: :-:f::r:.,..::::..,_............:..:,
..:::;:;.::<.::..::;;;<.: �t:�.:::::_::,;:-:;.r.ir.�.-.:.�:.:�::�� ::.:::.:::.::..:Y.-._:....:..---..................................�?... ....... .... .::
......-- .................. . ....::�- __�.> . . ,�.n .. r.N��.. .� .. . ,� �t � • - . ' . > > -. . , > . --..._...
D.• reptacement of public and private,fences,landscaping, and driveways
` when destroyed by construction. . , .. - . . , . .. � -
E. centeriine drainage culverts. . , - .. '
F. relay or adjust sanitary sewer lines� if required due to construction. �
�. relay.water mains or s�rvice and st�rms�vyer system, i� �equired c�ue tc
. GO�1SfCLtC#t4Ci. . ." . .. ..
. . , _ ,. .x�, . �
H. .��iay or adjust privately awned public utitities when �ot perfarmed at the
. � > . . . �:.>> .. ... _ . .
expense of the utility. " - - . ,
Strateqies 'i. shnabbery and trees no taller than 5 feet will be
plan#ed. ' -
2. no obsiar�es in c�ear zone, sigh# comers or
� between roadway curbs and trails.
(Eursting Poticy #f)
a
J
�
�
{
a
FF.2 share other costs as follows, for Cities with populations over 5,000:
A. engineering oosts will be split based on the County and City share of
construction costs.
B. traffic signals (inGuding construction costs for attached street lights,
inter+connection, pre-emption, $tc.) will be eligible for 50% County funds
afte� subtracting federal and/or Mn/DOT portions.
C. traffic control signals on the State highway system at their intersection
- with County highways will be eligible fo� 50�o County funds, for the non-
� '� federaVnon-Mn/DOT (trunk highway funds) portion. _
(Existing Policy �f5 b 6) ,
Strateqv: 1. lf city has obtained right of-way through platiing
� and proper planning, then the County will
' � • ' partapate in right-of-way acquisition.
(Exis�ii�g Policy �cj ;. - - •
�- ,. � ,. • - , .,, .
Backqround for FF.4 =�Noise Abatement � • • .
The issue of noise abatement Is covered in greater detafl under the Environmental
section. Under Mn rules it Is the.responsibility of the cities to adequately plan for
noise abatement in land use p/anning. The County is willing to help those cifies
who follow proper land use p/anning procedures when County road demands
increase requiring expansion impacting adjacent residents -
Strategy: 1. If the city has planned and provided for noise issues
the County will participate in �oise abatement
:��:��:::,:..,>;.�:�;:.>:;�...�:.. ::�.:;;.::> �::::<:.;:>.::;;.;:>:::::::::;:::�::<::::<;�.:::><.:;:::>�:>�::::::_>:;�:::;;<;:<:<::;::<;>;:<>�<::>;�:�::>::;:::::::>�:...::� .:::.::;:;�:;.
::<::::;.;�� .::.: �:..<.:.,.. :.<: �:<.: : ::<.
�F:�5�: �::::advance�fur�::a:;pr:t��ect:by.$greementwiih:�:th�:�raty::or�:rat�es Eci�rol. ..d.;:..::.;;;:::_;::;;:: ::::.;.:..
:. �::.. <::<...:;:.;:::::;::...:..:::..;:::: .:..:. , ..� ..;.:;;::�::�:::>;:.:.: ��:
.::: . . <:;::. :...:..:.. ....:.:
� �� �::re a. trment:;accordin <#o:<#fae.:cost.:sixare,schedute.:t(�: otiaes;_.:.::::�� ::::<. :::;;:;:` :::..:.:::::.:::.:. :.:
::. �;: :::<:<::::::� .::�_:>�.: �.>; .;::
.. .;. ;.. P..:Y..:;� _ ..::�.�:�: ��::: >: �;:;<:::;9.:» :�:.::.... .;;: .>:;=:_:: �;<.::-... ::;:. . : ;.:. <: :.;;:.:�> :::<:<.
� .:. :::.::: : :..: :.:: . .....
: ..::.:.. .:.....::.:.....�..>.:..:..,..:.:..;.:, ;: .:::...:.::;;.;:. :. :, :.. . ,..:::. .::::.....:.,.::::=;.;=<::::;�n<:::::>::::.::e:r`:.;�>:,:>or.
.,_ �<:irv#�en::fhe;:Coctn <:has;�leterm�ned tF�.at:a�:;road::�ro�e�t:;�s.:;necessary::.:.-;::d:;ih;.:::;ai�.::......
. . ... : .:.:.:.::::�= � :><::::::. ...:
.;. . _ .-: .
_ . :...
:� .:: : cines mvolved are ui�atite��:�o cost sfiare at fhe time d�signa�ed_in:.ttie:;Coc�nty :._ .
: : ;; .� .:...:: ; . ::::::.:.:::. ::. :.::.:...:�:.. ..:.::::.;. . : .. ...
.::: .: : : :::::.:::..
:,:;:::::;:. .;. ...: ... ..:-..:-:.....:. . .
� <:::::::�::»»<::. .
::::::��:>:.�>:�:�::Ca��ital�lm ��roverrier#f:#�tari; CIP::;::<::;:»::>:`:>�::�<::.:»::;:::::::::><::::�.:_.::::��:;:::.°:>::::`:<;:<; : ... ....:. ..:... �:.<;::<�.::.:=:;::
.. ... .. .. ......... P.... ......_. P _ ... . . ...... ........... . .. �. .._ -� -- ---- --- -�----�- ---. ..... . .....---�---. ..... ................. :::::.;�:�:;;::: :.::.�..:. ::
:���_s:
3
{
FF.9 pay costs far etigibte cans#ructian and reconstruction items {FF.'f. A-J) €or
projects on e�cisting �Caunty projecfis for cities with populatians iess than 5.000
and tawnships. '_ • .. . . . � .. . . �.
;-
(Existfttg Folicy #3} •
" i n - , 1. �. . • ' S `. . . e .. a . _ e . . . � .. .+ . � . � y y,
FF.'i 0 seek func#ing assistance for County transportation projects from federal, state,
and regional funding progcams:` :.. �� , ,. . . � , - ,. .. • • . - .. .:
.�a i %,�
{Existing Policy #9j �. , -
BackQround for FF.11- Township Allotment �
The '"Towr.ship Allotmenf" was crea#ed over 25 years ago i�a provide cons�fruction
funding for fownship fxrads Fte annual a/�otrn�rrt � 519, 9?� f6Y t�t� 92 i9wnships
Severa! years ago, sfate Jegislation was provided that,gives each tawnship a
portion of the gas tax. For Dakota Couniy tow ,nships thfs is �92,338. Cou�y staff
fs proposing fo eliminate the use of the "Township Allotirrent" fcr cans�trucfion ,
and use it to provide far interseciton ligh#ing.and sign r�epJaceme� . �-�. ��.. .-.. , �-�: �,. �
._ . .. � c _ .. e ,. 1�' ' , :i;� I. `p' . �r ._. . . , � 'i� �.f- ' . "
F.10 annually prepare and review the County Capital tmprovement Program {CiP)
(Appendix 1)
(Exrsting Policy #Et) ,
8ackqround for Policy FF 11- Bikewavs
Currently the County does not fund bikeways a» a1i County roads Bikeways are
funded only on Caunty roads which are designated as part of the County b�keway
sysfem. For example, although both Lexington and Diffley are County roads they
are nat part of the designafed bikeway system and therefore do not have
bikeways in keeping with MnDOT and FHWA policy Coutrty staff fee/ it is
appropriate to fund a bikeway on a!/.�County roads in ord'er to provide for
alternative modes of transportation.
4
�-
►
� �
: On the cument deslgnated County blkeway system the County wl/I only fund a
� blkeway on one slde of the road. If a cHy deslres a blkeway on the other slde of
ti� the County road the clty ls respons/ble for funding the second b/keway. County
; sfaff fee/ that the County should provide a bJkeway on both sldes of County
: roads; where feaslble. Staff proposes that the County pay 559ti of two blkeways
� rather than 1009�G of one blkeway. �
r
i
.
4
�
�
�
4. the County will share the costs (less any applicable gra�ts) for ove�lay or
�econstruction of Couniy bikeways: 55% County, 45% local, if the loca(
unit of govemment is following the adopted maintenance agreement. If
� the local unit of govemment has failed to follow the mainte�ance
agreement, the o��erlay o� reconsiruc�iion costs becdme tr�e soie
responsibility of the city. -
5. maintain and develop a five - year capital improvement program for
bikeways to be included in the County Capital Improvement Program.
L
7.
costs of engineering services for bikeways on the County System will be
eligible for funding by the County. -
the County will submit grant applications for bikeway funding assistance
to all available Federal, State and regional funding programs.
5
�
Existins� PolicY and Resolution . . � •
1. Dakota County will continue ta require those cities over 5,000 in population to
pay 45'°Yo af #he catstructian casts� an cast shared items for those Gounty road
projec�s that are lacated within the corporate boundaries of the City. Dakat� .
Coun#y has identified for following construction i#ems as acxeptable for cost
sharing. � - . �
{Rewritt�en as F.1 adding new environmental requiremer�ts. appendix #
inaludes items spec�c tv raadway construction)
A. right-of-way or slape easement for existing County roads.
. � ... _ ...��:. :;��«_:-„ ..� r � . ...s. k .... . �.;.- ',.
8. grading of the roadway. �;•, �.: , r . . . � : t- . ,:� ':�, •_: _ , � , .
C. surfacing of the-roadway: : i � . . . _ _ � , j
O. concrete .curb and gutter.
. '� " r, ' , , .
E. �� ` ca#ch basins and ieads for surface water drainage - �
� . ,� � ., . :;�.. .. • . .
F. replacement of pablic and priva#e #ences, landscaping, and dnveways if
- destrayed by ccnstruction. . . �., . � ' . _ .
. ^; .
G. centerline culverts - thase culverts which are open on bath ends and not
�- cannecied to any major storm struciure., ��. �:._ � A. -. :;. _
.. . . � ;.. r;,:, ! ... ,. • .. . � " �:r' . . � . ..
H. reiay or adjust sariitary�sewer lines if cequired due to c:anstruc�ian.
!. relay water mains or senrice and storm sewer system if required d�a� g�
construction.
J. reiay ar adjust pubiiGy owned pubiic ufiiities when not perfarms at the
e�ense of the utility.
K. engineering costs.
2. Local gavemments mus# pay 1q0% af cost of right-of-way and stope ease�ents
pius o#her damages for any newly established ar dedicated right of-way.
(Rewritten as F.3 including resolution 90-378) � '
3. For towns and townships with under S,OOQ population, construction costs fo�
projecis on existing County highways are paved by Dakota Cocan#y. the
construction items listed above (A-K� are 100% County responsibility, while
i#ems such as new storm sewer, new sidewaiks, etc. are 1C}4°lo lacai
responsibility. Where canstruction projects are not an existing Coun#y right of-
� way, the iacal gavemment must pay.944°lo cosi of right-of-way and slape
easement, plus property damages, for any newly estabiished or dedicated
6
Caunty highway.
�RewM�Een as F.3 a�d F.7�
4. The "tovmship allotmenY, established ove�r 25 years ago ta encourage
iownships under 5�000 in poputa6on to rebuiid their roads, wiii continue at the
annua! aggregate #ota! af approximately $19,972.
(RewriEEen as F.9j -
5. instaliation of Traffic Control Signals �
(Rewritten as F-2)
A. cost partiapation for the installation of traffic control signals on County
iroads af their intersections Krith othe� county roads o� with locat streefs
'' will be shared 509'o County / 50% Local, ~� ., -��
B. cost partiapation for the installation of traffic contral signals on County
'. roads at their irrtersection v�r�th s#ate highways wiil be shared 5t}% County
/ 50% local afte� subtracting the State's portian and other outside fund
SOt1CC,E?S_
fi. Dakata County wili par#iapate in #he insta!lation costs of street lights C?NLY �
whe�e they are attached to tra�c s;gnals an Cauniy hi�hways. The lights wi11 be
financed on t#�e sar�e ba�is as the installafson of traffic signals.
' � (Rewritten as F.2j �
7. Operatian of Traffic Controi Signais
�Rewritten as O/M.3 through 9j
A. Dakota County assumes a portion of the financial responsibility of
energy costs far traffic signal aper�tion, nat including the s#reet lights
� attached to the traffic signals, at aU intersectians witf� County highways.
The �ouniy's participation is based on ihe number of County "leg'
entering each intersection in proportion to the #otal numbe� of "legs'
en#ering the intersection.
B. • the iocal un'�ts of govemmeni are expected ta take finanaai responsibiiity
for the energy costs of all other "legsp entering the intersection (i.e.,
. lacai, state, etc_}.
C. cleaning, painting, and relamping of iraffre signals (not including the
attached street iights) are Caunfy responsibilities at all intersections with
Caunty highways.
D_ , maintenance of the signa! contraller and hardware is a Caunty
responsibility at atf intersections with County highways.
8. Dakota County has prepared a five-year schedule of expenditures for road
construction, ta be integrated with the County's Capital Improvement Program.
(See Tabie #7} �
�
9. Dakota County wil! ac�ively seek funding for road canstruction from the
appropriate feder�l, staie, and metropolitan agencies, suci� as the Federal
Highway Administration, MnDOT;�a�d the Metropalitan Gouncil.. .�
(Rewritten as F.8j � ' � � �
10. 6ikeways
1. fund a separate path on the �oun#y Bikeway System oniy or� one side o#
the road. Shoulders on bath sides of the raadway will be funded. where
designated and approg�ate.
. �, ,. •. .. ��. , - � - � . � � . , • . , ...
"" 2. �.. f, casts oi construction anci reconstruction of bikeways nat on the
approved �County Bikeway System will be the responsibilify of the local
community. �
. � .. , . . : t . � > �{� r. ..� . � .. -
3. � � provide 900°to of the funds {tess applicable County grants} for
construction of the County Bikeway System. . �
4. share fhe costs (iess any appiicable grants) for overiay ot reconstrucfior�
of Caunty bikeways: 55% Coun#y, 45% local,�if the l�cal unit of .
govemment is faliowing the adop#ed maintenance ag.reement. If the
local unit af govemment has failed to follow the ma9ntenance agreem�nt,
the over#ay ar �ecans#ruciion cosis become #F�e sale responsibiiity of the
city � .
�: , _. - , . -
5. construction of Gounty Bikeways will accur with Gounty highway :•
construction when ever possibie.
fi main#airi and deveiap a five - year capital impravemeni program for
bikeways ta be inGuded in #he County Capital Improvement Program.
7. cost of engineering services for bikeways on the Gounty System will be
eligible €or funding by the Couniy.
8. submit grant applications for bikeway funding assis#ance to a!! available
Federal, State and �egionat funding pragrams.
8
Enerav/Environmen#
._._�.Proposed Policies:
It will be Dakota County's policy to:
EE.1. evaluate environmental effects of projects and adhere to guidelines, licenses,
and permits as required by County, State and Federal regulations.
(1982 Transpo�tation Plan) '
Strateqy: 1. �Share maintenance costs based on contributing flows.
(See Funding poticies)
EE.3 a�aid �oad r�r,sfrUcton in we�aRds, pr�te.ted �v�ld(ife hab�tat i�niq�e _
agricultural land, and other sensitive environment4l areas where feasible.
When avoidance is not feasible� the County will minimize and mitigate impacts
caused by County road projects. '
Strateqv: 1. Create wetland mitigation areas within the affected
�� watershed first,' and within Dakota County second.
:: -<::::::.-..:>:.;::.::;::::.::::;:r:;::,:::r::.,»-:<;.::..�.;�:;:�.>:.:<�::.;;:;:<:� :.::::::....::::.::....:::.:.:.:-:::
::.._:,:.�;�-:>:::::�;::::;:;:;::;:>:,;;:<.:;>:;;;>: :..:>:;>«:�:.:::::<:;__;:<;<::;:-::>-::>�::>;:;:>:>:,.;::>:<:::<;:�::.:.:;::::;:,:;:::. ... . ._ _
�E 4 �re�te �vet�and.;r��i aisor�:;areas=>�a �om �l .:wifh��:Ip:ca[i::;stafe�:�nd:�federal.;.. :ermit��::::::>:�:
.......... ........... ......... ............. ... . ..:. ..g. .... ..................�:. . ....... ...P.X.......,.:...........--- �-•�---..... ............. ............:......�. . . ..... ....... .
StrateQv: 1. Use the County Soil and Water Conservation District
(SWCO) for wetland delineation on County transpo�tation
projects. '
EE.5 employ traffic management system (TSM) techniques to reduce air pollution
through more efficient operation of the roadway system.
(1982 Trnasportation Plan)
Strateqy: 1. Signal6ming.
2. Use of shoulders for transit vehicles
9
�
Strates�ies: 1. The use of certain types of solid waste materiai as fill
� may be acceptable when the potential for environmental,
public health, and safety problems are minimal.
2. Purchase and� use recyclable materiais and products in
conjunction with Counry transpo�tation projects, where
feasible and cost effective. as direded by Minnesota
� Statute 115A.48.
Strateqy: " 1� Promote cutting rather than'use of chemicals to control
weeds. " � �
Strateqies: 1. Use and maintain native prairie plantings along roadways
to reduce encroachment of undesirable plant species and
to help �e-establish native prairie diversity.
2. Complete plantings and maintenance in accordance with
Operations and Maintenance policies.
. ..:. ...:.: :..,:..::...:.:; . :.. :.:;.. . :.. .:... ._:...:.: : ....:...:;:...:..:. .. ._.:�,..:,_ ..,:...._.:..::. ... _ . _ . . . :.::. ...... .:_.... .: : . .
::::. ;...:>::,:� :::. .: . .::.:. :. ..... .....
.:::::;.;:.::: .. ... ... .:::.:. :....... .
......
:: � �cortformance::wi�ti�:�APCA>:...:ermit:«:���::;��':��..;`�_:`::<::�����:<>:::��>:>-:;::::;::::::;:<�:::.<>::::::;�::� :::::' �;::<::`:>`:;::::::<:::;�.�::`�>�:::<::>�:�.'.>::>::>:��;:>:
:.. ::.�.� :::. . :..:.: ..:::::::::..:.�:::...:.:::..�....�.::.::..P.._.::::::.::. ..::. ... ....... . ... ..............,.... ....................... .
10
7
0
�
u
0
Strateqy: ' 1. Wor{c with Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD)
to develop soil erosion plans and practices on County �
transportation projects.
EE. 13 maintain sedimentation effec�iveness of storm sewer systems.
StrateQies: 1. Clean drainage ditches, gutters, and storm sewer inlet grates.
2. During winter maintenance season, Dakota County will adjust
the ratio of salt to sand to limit the amount of sand washing
into catch basins. .
3. Prioritize maintenance activites to limit sand washing into
catch basins. �
EE.14 continue to monitor noise impacts along County roads.
(�982 Transpartatbon Pl�n� `
11
�
0
Existins� Policv
(1982 Tra�sportation Plan)
1. Dakota County v�nil consider the use of cost effective energy saving materials in
transportation-�elated construction projects.
(Incorporated in proposed policies) �
2. Dakota County �nn"II assess environmental effects of projects and adhere to
guidelines as required by state and federal reguia�ons.
(Rewritten as E.1) , - �� '
3. Dakota County, where feasible, will avoid road construction in wetlands,
significant wildlife hati�tat, prime agricultural land, and other sensitive
environmental areas.� ` ' � - --' - � �� �
(Rewritten as E.3) ' ' � �
4. Dakvta County will employ traffic management techniques to reduce air
pol(ution. � �
(RewritEen as E.5)
5. Dakota County will con6nue to monitor the noise impacts along County roads.
(Rewritten as E.14)
12
0
�
3. DE51�N/Cf�NSTRUCTIC.?N
�
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTICIN
Proposed Policies:
!t wi1! be Dakota Counij�s policy to:
Backaraund for DIC 1- New desivn standards
/n developing and malnialnin,g an e�cien� cast effective County #ransportation
` system, there must be�unifarm�fy wfthin #he design and canstruciion stHrrdar+ds ..
��-���- ln the 1982 Transportation Policy Fian, Dako#a County established standards for
___.� .. deslgn:°_:The Minnesota Departmertt of Trans;porfa#iarr (MnDt)'F), MnDOT State Aid, �:. _
' • �� �� and i4merfcan Assoclatfon of State`Highway and Transportation O�cials �: . , - -� .: � ":; �
. _, �.,.
- ��- �AASHTt3j also have established staitdards . _ � _ :. - - _
.. .. _. .. . _ _. _, . ... . ................ . �.�` � .
.- 1rr some cases, esfablfshed Couniy siartdards vary from MnOQT and St�te Aid
standards requiring'adjustments in design plans /n order to maintain .
conses%�tc}r and �Jfcxw rn�rirpaur» flexibi/ifjr, staff is recornmending thQ Cou�r .,
adopt MnDOT, MnaOT S"t�te Aid, and AASHTO s�tandards .
(1982 Transpartaiian Plan)
; ;:�;-.
DIC.2 caa�d'mate des'ign details between the Cauniy and other jurisdictions.
(l982 Transportation Plan �
D/C.4 design traffic control devices according ta the Highway Tra�c Regulation AcE
and the Mir�nesota Manuai of unifarm Tra�c Control Devices.
(1982 Transporiation PJan �
Sfra#eqies; 1. AI#hough #he County discaurages utilities f�om placing
their facilities under the d�ving surface, the utilities are
atlowed, by permit, to busy #heir faciiiiies and ta cross
under the driving surface.
2. Manholes will not be placed in the road surface.
!3
Existins� Policv and Resolution:
1. Dakota County will utilize the following generai standards in the design of
County roads. � , . � �
(Rewritten as D/C.1) _ �
RURAL DESIGN URBAN DESIGN
Number of Lanes 2 4 2 6 �
Width a# Traveled Surface - 24'� � 48' 44' 906'
Wei ht Ga aciiies tansla�cle 4 � 9 � 7 9 -`
Shautderwid#hlCu�s � • ; none ,� ..... 90'� , curtys . , ' cu�s
Desi n S eed -' �•` �� r 30 MPH ��•. - 50 MPH • 40 MPH �, 5Q MPN
Si ht DisiaRce 20Q' �340' •� 200' . 3Q0't'; "�
Road Gradient 89�0 . � 0'3� 8°k 0°/a �
Clear Zans 94''��'• 30' 90' 3C1' .
A�teriat S acin 3 miles 5 miles 1 mile 3 miles
� Paved or gravel su�#ace .. _ . . . , . . .
� Urban desi n roads inctude curbs and utters -� � •
2. Des:gr. �etaiis tv�li �ae c��rdi!�a#ed be;weer� th� Coun#�► ard other�uris�lictions to
provide safe transitions between roadways A ._ . . . . , . _ ,
{Rewritten as D/C.2� ' � "
3. Dakofa County wip piace and opera#e fraffic controt devices accarding #o
standards as stated in the Minnesota Manual if Uniform Traffic Cantrol Devices.
�Rewritten as DlC.4j '
i�
.
RIGHT-OF-WAY PRESERVATION & ACQUISITION
Proposed Policies
!t will be Dakota Count}is policy to:
RW.1. require right-of-way dedication for plats adjoining County roads acco�ding to the
Contiguous Plat Ordinance.
(1982 Transportation Plan)
, . � _ • . , ;,� . . . . . . . � , . ,
��'.�-�� StrateQies: �= �� ��1.'°� Follow right=of-way dedication guidelines in making these
deteRninations and consider features such as �
topography, obstaGes, inclusion of trails, major ��
intersection geometric, site distance, roadside safety
�•- • =- "° dear zones, �snow �emovel storage, and other design
� characteristics that could influence the width of right-of-
waY• � ��+PPEndir. 4).
. . . , � ,
�• 2. Initiat� coordination with affected cities to deteRnine how
•. •= - right-of way may be rnost �ffecGvely �btai�ed.
� �. � (Resolution 82-14TI - _
Discussion:
The implicatfons of this policy include:
1) buy more homes
2) pay more damages
3) more di�cult to justify buyfng land
RW.3 cooperate with others to develop multiple use agreements for County roads or
jointly-ov+med rights-of-way with private and public interests.
(1982 Transportation Plan)
RW.4 follow standa�ds for placement of utilities, trails, and other structures within
County road right-of-way.
(1982 Transportation PlanJ �
..:.:: .:: ::: .:..:::.:..... :.: :...::. ........ ............ .�--.. ....... ........ ....... ............ . ..
..... .. : .:.:.::>:::.::>::::::.. -.: ::. .:::::::. :..: ....::..:>: ::-.:::.-:�.:=:;:�::�: ..;�.:.:::.:.;.;::-:.: .._::. :..,. ..:.....:. ....._..:.:... .. .... ........ ... .
. ...... .:: ..:......:.:::...: :::..:...:�:,.....:.:: :,:.. :.:-::.,.,:. ._.::: �.:;:.:;
�V1/;5::':;:::�`.;;:�>:i�evelo` :a;Coun_";:viride::ma�:::�ased:i� n�lon �:fem��: tem:r�eeds:ta:ldenti :�>:.:
....... . . .......... ..: ..� ,::::-<;.;...::::tY::: :.;... . . P::;: �:: . P� :. ::: �-;>:::::�; ...�YS..,.:;.: ..:, ._. : ; . <:.>:�',>,
:?:::�::..�>.;:::;:=:::;>::><�°:<::�3:-:`tif���iva::.:.;::..e:::.:..-::.::;:::�:::�:::::::;.�.:::::::�:::::_;_:;:.:>::::::;;::�; .>:::;<:;: .::.::..:.:;:.;:.::..;: :: .... ..:.::..::.::.:;.:. :::.:::.:. .::. �;:.;. .::�.::>:�.::: ::��..
.;:-:>:::. �;::�<<��::�:.:.:.:.. . :........f. . . . .n etls,::,.. �:..::� .:::.. .::::.:.: :: . .;:::.:�:::.::<:;.>:;...:>;. . �.:: ::;;>...; � : �:.::.. .:< :...: .:.
.... . .. .:.:9..:... Y .:.::..::. ::.:.:� :.::.:..;... .
. ....:...:....:.. ......�.::. :.::::.:.; .::.�:.. ..:::::.::... .,
...::.::: .....:..::: .:::::::: ..::.:..<. .:.:::::: :;;;:.:;::.;;:>:;- ::::.::;:;;::::.::;::..::.:.�::::::. .;:.:::��:.. ._._.�:::.�:::.�:..:::;::....:::::. ..:. .....:..:.. . .::. .:.:: .... ... :::. .:: .....
StrateQies: 1. Consider the following:
� 20-yea� traffic p�ojections
15
• Function of road
+ Gorridor preservation
• Consistency with policy objectives
+ Environmenia! consideratians
• tnteRnadai pa#ential
, ,,.;; . .. ,; �
Back.around for ura,�ased' nalicv RW. 8, � •.,. ,-,-
Another tool for lmplemeniing a cQmprehensive plan is official mapping, Fhe
o�cial mapping should not be confused' with ifie comprehensive plan or the
zoning map. The primary purpose of an o�cial map is to preverti or farestaf! #he
construction of bu3/dings and other privai�e improveme�s on land designated by
the cammunify fvr future s�treet right-of-ways, street wfdenings arrd street
ext�nsions. Q�cfaf ma�rpin� has �Iso 4ee� u�ea► �n som� jurisd�cfians to Qrev�nf
consfruction of bui/dings oo /and desig�ated far parks, draina,ge ways and other
/and designated for publfc purposes. "
The use of o�cia/ mappi»g fs designed ib save the pubJic expense af acqufring,_ ..,. .,� �:
and removrng bul/dings erected in the right-of•way of fu#ure streets and ather.,;•.
public sreas Thus,1# ensures that thls land w311 be acquired at the markef value
of the land. �
The aa►apfion of art o�cial map does NOT create public ownership �n the land.
The gavernment agency musf compensate the property owner for ihe land at #he
fime it is acquired for a stree� parly or other purpose. Hawever, the map does
relieve the goverrtmerrt unit of comperrsating the properfy owner for any buildings
and improvements constructed in the designated areas after the o�cia! map has
beett adopted .
The o�cial map is a lega! document which must be o�ciafly adopted by the laca/
unit of governmeni 1# must also be recorded w�tf� ihe Registrar of Deed and is
enforced through the issuance of bui/ding permiis
/f a community does not i�rtend fo acquire the /and marked on the o�cial map for
a street until the far dista�rt future, the courts may s#rike down #he map ss a faking
of land wifhout j'ust compensation or an unreasonab/e restriction on the use of
the Jand. According to fhe Municipal PJanning Ac� if fhe o�cial map is
challenged by the properl'y owner, the local community then has six monfhs to
acquire the /and or a building permii wil! be fssued (M.S. 469.359, Subd 4).
:..::..::::::::.:.:>:;:;:::::.:;;:;;�:,:;:::;;;:::>;; :..:;;-_;;:;•,<:.::::;::}>::;:�>�>.<:_� :>•»::;:.:<;-�s:;:�:>::.:;::;:;.::::::..:.:-_.,:.,.:.:::::::.:;:::....:;:.:.;:.:::>�.;:::.;:;:�:.;:::;:.;:.:.;:.;::::;:.:;:<:r.;:.;::,:.::>;:.;:.:-::.:::.:..:;:�;;:::_.:
:: �:<:: :: : . . . :: . . . ... ......,,.
:.RW.B: �:ad . ...:.. . ..:..:. .. ...:::::::>:::.:::>:�>::::::::>::<::::;:�>:>:>:::>_::>:::r::�.::::.<:::
..:::... .:..: :;:.... opf .an.:offiraat:ma rn <s�rd�nar�e:; {3MC� <��c`:;Got�. _ <:roatis...::.>: :;::�;�.::.::.::.::.:<.>r;»:.»:<.:.:«.::.::;.>:.:<;:.: -
. . .. .... ... i?P.....5 ....... .................... i......... ...�...... ........._. .�Y.. ... .............. ..........--�--.................,..... ....
16
Existin� Policies/Resolutions
(1982 Transportafion Policy Plan)
(1) Resolution 90-378
That city-county cost splits for right-of-way acquisition on new County carridofs
be detertnined on an individual project basis with the County share to be from
09'o to 55% as deteRnined by the Dakota County Board of Commissioners.
(lVloved to Fundin�
(2) Resolution 82-342 . _. ti- . .. „ �,�,. :�, .. -_ .. • ... .
When a new plat lying adjacent to a county highway is p�esented to county and
municipal authorities for review, the amount of right-of-way to be dedicated will
� be deteRnined based on the a�iticipated futu�e design of the county highway.
The following guidelines will be used in making these determinations.�,ln �;::
addition, features such as topography. obstacles, inGusion of trails, major
intersection geometrics, and other design characteristics that could influence the
width of right-of-way, wilt be considered. �. .••• .
(Rewritten, see RUi/.2)
(3) Resolution 82-147
That the County Board adopts the �ecommendation of the Transportation Policy
Advisory Group that the County initiate ea�1y coordination with affected cities to
determine how right-of-way could be most effectively obtained for each
individual highway project and that responsibility for�right-of-way acquisition be
identified and induded as a part of the construction ag�eement for each project.
(Rewritten, see strategy for RW.1)
9982 Transqoriation Policy Plan
(1) The County will require that right of-way dedication be made available by
developers prior to final app�oval of any plat
(Rewritten, see RW.1)
(2) When a new plat lying adjacent to a County highway is presented to county and
municipal authorities for �eview, the amount of right-of-way to be dedicated will
be based on the anticipated future design of the County highway. The following
guidelines will be used in making these deteRninations. In addition, features '
such as topography, obstacles, inclusion of trails, major intersection geometrics,
and other design characteristics that could influence .the width of right-of-way,
will be considered.
Future Desicln of Hiqhwav
2-lane urban
2-lane naral
41ane undivided
�7
Total R-O-W �equired
100 feet
110 feet
120 feet
41ane divided 150 feet
6-lane divided 200 feet
(Resolution s2-342J
(3) Dakota County will initiate ea�iy 000rdination with affected ci6es to deteRnine
how right-of-way could be most effectively obtained for each individual highway
� project. The responsibilities for right-of way acquisition will be identified in the
construction ag�eement for each highway projec�t.
(Resolution 82-1�7)
—{4)
. t' B . : r �. . . ,. . . , =}. . ._ . • . .. . �
. � .. . , .. . . .. . • . , -., w�., r. .nr , . ; , , .. ' . . ..
-i5)..
.. _ - . . , - .. . � _ -_
(6) Dakota County will coo�dinate all actions with County road or jointly owned right
of-way with private and public interests. . • - •
(Rewriffen, see RW.4) � '
l7) Dakota count� will deyelop layout standarcis for placement of utilities, trails, a�d
oth�r structures within County road right-of-way.
� (Rewritten, see RW.4) � - � � � ' ' "
�$) �
. :��; .. . .. ,� . _ � ,
(Moved to Railroad section) . _ : • . `E - °� • � : -
(9) ,
(�loved to Fcenctional Class�catian section} .
(10)
,
(Deleted no longerrelevant�
18
`
5. FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFiCAT�ON
0
.
�
Back�rround
FUNCTIt�NAL CLASSIFICATICIN
Determin/ng the fun�tional c/ass�cation of ihe County naadway system can help .
direct where futune growth wtll occur withln_ the Cou�rtty. Asslgntn� a functla»a!
classJfJcation to a road and attaching eccess contraJ measurers to the functlonal
classfficaflon system wlli help to ensure #hat the County roadway system Is being
utilized !n the most e�cient manner possible. .
.� .• . _
Proposed Poticies: � � " "
/t will be Dakota Count�s palicyto: ,. _ . , : . - _ _ ., ,. , „ .�
. ,. . . . , ...�. ,.� . . ..
, . , . - . ,; � . �� � � . ° . . , .
_., . - . ._- �,.. �. .. ... .... . � .-
�
Backqround for aroposed policies FC.6 8 FC.T
To ensure that the Gounty road neiwork can coniinue ia provide its mability
function it must not become overJoaded with #rips that should be on the /oca/
r�oad nefworl� Currerrtly, the County road network is affen used io complete shart
distance trips which should be accommodated on fhe local road system. These
trips are not being accarrrmodated by. the locat road system 6ecause either the
/oca/ road system does not exist or the loca! road systems of different
municipatities do not connect. The County would like to see an inie,grrated /oca!
road system deveJoped to complement the County road system and ensure that -
t9
0
t/ie County road system can provlde its Intended functlon (mobllfiy). One way i�o
do thls !s i�o requlre that developments adJace�rt to County roads have access to a
loca/ road system and NOT solely access to the County road syst+em.
.,.
. , :.�� � �. .. . _. , . . .
Discussion: � 'E - - � � - � -
This is done to ensure the use of arterials (principle, minor A, and
minor B) for longest trips, collectors (major and minor) for intermediate
and local trfp� and local streets for loca! access. -
- - � ; -w � _� � " --
20
,
Existins� Policies/Resolutions:
(1982 Transportation Policy Plan)
(1) Functional Class�cation Map (198�
21
�
t
W
�
�
r:. '•!A ' � �� � ' l:t.�. :"��
': �'� ,� . , . ' t,; �,,�y�' Y ' . 4
..�. 1 F � �?� � ,t, '
�'l • � .. ,. •f��•
; Ntob�il�� /Access� �Na �•am
y �.
Mability
Highest
(Freeway}
�. : . � .. .. . .:�t:.. � -. .
� � � , . , . , , ; . , ;Z �� • . Land Access
, , . , , . , �,: . Highest
� E , - � � � � ' � � � (Cul-de-Sac}
• i � i • �',•
i ' ' i � . � '.�'�',','�', ,','.'�
� . • • 1 , � . ,•.. � . . ,`� . p . .�,�. � '.' , � .'.
.� .�
� , i , . ;.�; :�� � , . , , , �'�,r.� � �`, '�' '�' .
� .,..:,;.:.., i � , � , � .' ,. . , ' � � , ,
( • , •. �,.r•.c�.,;. . � � ��� ��� - � . �� �
1 '� ' '�•ti•.'l,.'r„ � t, a .1 �, ' � � � �' � �t ;' � �' � ' �' ' � ` �
.,,.:,..;•.. �.. � , , , ,,r , ., ,
i . �. •�� .i a . .,;�:..�n�;::.+,i:.� � , , .,:t,,.;,: •� •'�.�'•, � : : '•' ;
�:�. ; ,.�. �°:;
� • � •• -�', • ., � �„�Ij�IT.:?, �� •��i{����� � � � � ,�� �1�� � �. , . . 1 . �
. � � ' 4 :. ' ���,yr:�t., I�'"�' � � � � � � � � � . � � ��. � �
_%'.'"" � • e •.t � � ♦ � i ��e �i���� .�• • �+� 'y
• I . . , .. 1 .' � •�. . �'' � �� ! .1��try.T'. ��L". � � � � . � � t .
:;:h:..:.t'7. : 1' �'������ i� � � � ���'��• . I.�� ��. �` �� . �
' ' _ �': �' � �• � �'� � � � . � ♦ • ��f ';. �� ;
.. � i.•�� , :.j.:IF'r,�:�•�::�F* i�r • r.i � � � t � � �� �.•j�� .t � •
.�t.. .�' � � � � � • � � • � ��� � ��� � .`��. �f.
� .. �: .; .;;., ,..i,,,,,,,,, , ,;,�. „' ,' .
'��,•;..;..dr.;�,1+ .t s. t• t �� i• � t t�� � �e .i. ���
, ' i.... . . , .: �.��� � , � � �, ���� �`
' � �� � � �
I ' • ' �'`��'!'�'� . +,� ' .
,;r • •, .
' . 1 ' , t I '� "�� '�'�'' � � � �� �� ����
, �� � � � � �
� `''. • ( 'f, ����• �.��..���e � � . � ��� �`+�+� �t+
� � ia �i �.��� �� � + . i � I, � •
I � •�� ����.�_�r .�e�r � ���
' :� '� .�,t � ����. � .1 . .
I ,'.',' ,'„� `1' '�` �
! { . �� �!� �� � � ����� �� •
.i� � �
I� • ♦� : . .�� . � . ��.
' .�� � � � � 'I.�
1 . .�a', . .• ��� .��� .{.
I �� � .� ��� �c
� ��� ������ �� �. � � � � ���
'`. . .�o � � ��� ��. .���. ��: .�+
f '� `�`�' � �� i� �� ���� � � . . � (,`�
�' � �� � ���� ��� 1�� �� � ����� .
i' '� • • � � . r ���� � 'r ��� ���' . '' •
� � � ', � . � � � �'� � � {��' � � '� �
, ' � � � � � � � �'� '� �' ��. � ',' t,' � �
� , �'.'.'��`, � . � �'. � �'t . . �' ;�� `� � �� .
�'� , . . . � , . � � . � ',' ,' t �
� �i � � i� �� r � � � � ��� � � �` � ��� �� � � � ��� � . .
� � .� � � ��� � � �� � . � �� � � ����
� r � � � . i � f • • � � � r . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � , r ' . ; �
,1�1�� � ` i� 1+�,1 1 �, li I 1 � 1 �1 I,�t1 •
�, , �,* ,, ,' '�',4� , � , �'� , � �.� � �' , '�' ,r,� � .
i�' •. �� � � ,� � + �, �
�,�� �� t � f � �. ♦ t��� �t�� � � � t� r ,' , �
� � � � . . � r� ��� � � � �� ��� �'�� ��i���
', ,'�'���' '� � �� ��' � �'�1. �'�'� '�' �'� .1'.
,�� , � � ��� � � � � .}+�, .
,�, '.�.��` . .' ��� y ��� �.
� . . � .
�'1 . . , : tvtobility [�
C � � Saurcc� N111UI1�1i CUppC�QIIVQ
l•iif;i�way Rrsearch t'ragram ,
Uet�mUer 194;1
. Land Access C��
l� ICUItJ, T•lp
ACCESS/MOBIi.ITY
Back�rround
A prlmary functfon of the County raad network ls ta prov/de mobJlity and
contlnuhfy througrhout the Counfy: Land access funcf/ons are befter provided by
local and collector streets. The mobilrty of anterfal and colleci�nr streets Is
campromfsed by the pravision of access to property abuttJn,q the Caunfy roads
Access management (Jand access and inferse�ctions spacingj can be used to deal
with traffic problems Including accfdents, tra�c delay, increased fuel ��,� ,.
consumptTon, and auto emissions,' which raesult from �onflicts beiweelt `,�hrough"
tra�c and tra�c enterfn,g and exfting dinect access driveways :�.�
At the present tfine, there are few direc# and coninuous transportation roufes
th�ougrh the County. With over 50 percent of !`he employed resfdemfs of Dakota :
County working outslde of Dakota Coun#y, ease of direct travel becomes�'an
important Issue The /ack of cross-county co»tinuiiy causes tra�c congesiion irt
severa! corridors, partfcularly during peak perfods of travel.
Proposeti Policies:
!t will be Dakota Count}rs policy to:
Discussion:
There is a need for increased coord�nation befween cities to aflaw f�rr�
travel between cities on local roads There are areas where #he local roads
in one cify do not conneci wi#h ftte local roads in another ciiy.
Strateqies: 1. Identify couniy highways o€ metrapoli#an signifcance and
pians far access controi.
2. Direct access to property should be #o ioca} roads, whicii
can be connected to county roads at appropriate
iocations.
Discussion:
Control of access is necessary for fac3lity mana,gement Hi.ghway access
cantral may be accamplished by resiricting median cuts ar crassings,
22
bul/dln,q grade,separated lnter+changes, or by nestrfctln� land access
poJnts The fewer access polnts on a hlghway, !fie hlgher its capacHy and
ihe lower Its acciderrt rate.
Stratec�ies: 1. Post laad �estriciions
2. Des"sgnate fwin iraiter routes
3. Designate 14-ton coutes
4. Designa#e the A-mir�or ar#ecials by function, i.e., relieve�,
expander, augmenter, or connector
23
7. JURISDICTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
JURISDICTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
Back�round
In general, roadways whlch solely serve /oca/ iransportatlon needs are owned
and maJntalned by the local government Roadways, such as freeways, which
serve r�eglonal, fiiter+county or state-wide b�nsportatfon needs are owned and
inaJntalned by �e�state. The County owns and maintalns the �oads that provfde
connectlons to major actfvffy locations wifhin the counfy and roads that provide
access to land uses tftat facilitate development
Proposed Policies:
!t wil/ be Dakota Countys policy %:
Discussi�n: �
The County is anticipating that MNDOT will be approaching Dakota County
to discuss turnbacks /n �reparation the County wou/d like to 6egrin
functional and jurisdictional classification studies and that these studies
Include the state, county, cities, townships, and other affected parties
JC.2. continue to evaluate �oadways identified for potential jurisdictional changes,
incJuding �oadways not on the County system, based on the following
criteria:
� Traffic volumes
>.::;:: ��`<'�:.::::;:'' -_ -
�;>: �: � :>a :.:; �-:: <»;::,
..Funct�on Class�cafion::;=�...:.�':�;..�,:_;�:::::.�:::::>:>::;<:;.<>>::>:::<�:;::;:;::::>:::�:<`:»���«<::::::::;:::;:<::":>::�:::::>:_::::>::`>><�::::::'::';:`��:;'':::::<::::::::
;. ... . 1 .. -
:.: ..�. ..:.. .�. -.....:� ...:.. .... ....:. ..: ..:. ::: .:.:::..:::..� :.::. ::.::....:.::. -....:......:::-_-:::.::::.:�._:::.:...::::.:.:.:.::.:..:.:.:�: -:.�:-:. .::.:.:::..�:.:::.:�:.
• Connections to major activity centers
� Connectivity to the metropolitan transportation system '
:;<:;�;:;;-`� �}�� - - _
. 00'<:.<:<;:;;:;;0'':;»:;»::><>: ;;;;;�•:;:>.
. fi . ds m �reme :fu�,<>ctio>;:..:..`� .`��-:`::>`':''-:;:�;:��::`>;�::::::>:�»=�;`:<::::>_::>':::::;�'>�<:><��»: :�::::>::::>:�:�:�::;:���'�`:>::�:::��..:;
.; .::.: :.;�.:.:;:.::..:..:..
... ... .. r�...:n..__ n...,..;. ...::::.::: .::::���:::->�<:. :::��::�::
....:...:.....:.:;;:.. ..:. �--� --..
-� � � . :.......:: �.. �::: ; :::;::��.:.::�:::� :::<;;::><:;::>:::<::::>:>::..:,::>..:. ,.:: .:<,: :.. ,: .. . .: -::. ...
>,:...:;::; ::.. ........ :::;::::.:;..:_::::::_.:�::::::.....:::>:�;.:::;:.:;; � ��:::. .:..:..:. ...:.. ...:.:<::.;:;>:::�..;: .:::: ..:.
.. ;::�:;:: . > �-
.. .:: ..: .::.:..:..:�:... .:;:..:: . -. �.:.;.� . .:::.. ;.: : :....:..::.:..:..
c�:
c nom� m cf:::_��:::::. �:::<.:.:.:.; :.:.::::..:::::�:>;>> :::::<:::.�;<�:. ::
.: :......� a . . � . . . �;;:.. �:: ; .: ::.:.::.:::<>. <::.>�,.::::::;�::>� .:::::::>��.;::::::::::>::._::;:::::<.:::�;
� ..:.�. .... ... .:. . :..: .:::::. ..�: :.:.:..:...:... .:...
24
3
7
?:1:n; �. ;�.;{.:.}Sr ""x: v:::: •.:i:::i:tOi:i�::.::'F.i:.:i:•:!:�':.:4}::iix
:v.:::::: �:::: :�:: .: .....�........� ................ .......... _ ....... ...,... .:............. ...... .. ...t........,. ...... ..
n..:,�:x:�.:v:::.:vv:�_••::.v:r.: . n�::•.:�v::.:. nv:n:.... ." r.,rr.......
.........n . .::: .:......:':i:. . ..........v ......... .!.'"'::x:.:..:.:.................:..:; .:.. ...w.: •.v.v�:. �y�::_:.;n.t......n::?i:...r::.::_r
,_...;:.;;:•;; ... .i � ...n.;v:: .:.........:. ...... ::±::::::�:!�_... .._..........:....;.:..,-;:......:........•:.t... -
- �:}::''Y::...".i:::-,r::ii:'?-:�: �:}�'•:•:'!,+${i
:�.::"i:� t '
f -�
ti�! .;X8CSt2l�. :��C@S�>:;:::::::>;:ti:>::s.;.::<::-:;::;::::<;::-:::::>::::,:'.,';z»:>::<;:>y.:;::;::::<:::s:::::;:L:>,:�::>;:;;ti_s..:irti,>:Y-::�:::-;::;_:<:::ss>';:::;�::::::?;::;
•::.,:.>:::::�......::.1�Y.:.:... .:.....:......�_�ns�.::::......:........::.,�:.::::::<.:: .:::::...:..,�::..::,:.�:.�.,.:..,....�., ...�<•......,.::.,�,,::.:.,.<,..�„_........:.::,.i.�:,..,�.:.:.,
• Spacing between County roads
.:.,:.>:.::,.F:-:.,<,::,:..;;;�:;.,;,:;::..:::..K .v,,,:,.:,,;:.�:r::.
<.>:.:.::.>:::::.ri..r�.:-.-:r:�,._;..,�:.<..Y :.��.,,:.:: ri.,..:.::.��,,:::�:::r,,:,.:::._.:,i�.,:�:�.:::.>,::::.=:,;:.::::::::..;>;�:>-.: ,.,>...
�..f:,e�..`r..:S:% ..ef.f.v:::::. f�:x:n�:.�.:?�vr r.ry.:::::4n•�:::.•.•+._ �.:{ii�'Tii':fi?:f?v{i•:.•;}i:ii::�Y•:::::
:rfii:•:,,.::';?t:: ::::4:ti%"v`::i`.2:: �: •y:a:::�..:...t..r."n":......
:: h:�: . �s...... _r:S........ ..
:.y:�<.;•.:�. : •.: ,. ,....:... .. ........,-.:,-:::2>:::.
. ,.:•::.: . -r+ � -.... - ....� ..............r.... ,:.. ....... .
� t���:i:•i:i3:•i::•i:iti:.iT:�i:'.•:� :i�:�iii:i:.Li�. .:}?:•i':i-i""r"�:�:i.rflf,•::i::: ;fY;:
:,'.:: _:; j »}Y :
.i; •.'+i
� M - ::J•'�'
)::�j:::�:i'�.::
..Roufe::c n n <::>�:: . ,. . � :
....� .......,. _
<.t<� . . . ...............,.........�.......,........,.r.,..,.r.:
... ....... ..... ~�: y�::.. ... .... .
..................:.�."�.:1.:::``` .. .........;3i:�.....,,....,........... ......
o-::,.'tt� :::::::.::..... :. . . . ..x:�:�,-.:: :.:::.., a:: :... .: .::: .,. : :.:::.---... .. .......... . ...... .. ....,... .....,...... . . ... ... ... .
(�l982 Transportatlon Plan) -
Strate�v: 1. See Appendix 5 for recommended tumback agreement "�.
guidel"snes. ..
Stratepies: 1, R�quest #hat tiie city �eassign mi(eage wtten��the���� -�.•�. ,�.
Screening Board has approved a �oadway for C$AH
' stafus. ` • - - _ }� . �. _,° ' •
- • • " _ . .� � • . .. . �.r� ..,
25
Existins� Policies/Resolutions:
(1982 Tiansportation Policy Planj
(1) Dakota County will coordinate efforts with local units of govemment to complete
road tumbacks in acoo�+dance with Minnesota Statutes 163.11 �.e.� a public
hearing will be held before any formal decision regarding road tumbacks is
made).
(Rewritten, see JC 3)
(2) Dakota County will evaluate the roads identified for potential tumback, based
on:
• Traffic Volumes
• Continuity of County Road System
• Spacing with Other County Roads
• Access Considerations that Include:
1) access to major activity centers
2) linking to metro transportation systems
3) fam�-to-market fundion
(Rewritten, see JC 2}
(1) Resolution 84-447
That the following schedule of tumbadcs be adopted, and the County Engineer
is directed to start the necessary improvements that are to be accomplished by
the Road & Bridge Department � �
(2) Resolution (1985) - (tumback agreements)
(a) Townshiq AQreement
1) Couniy 8� Township agree an compensaiion or work necessary before
tumback.
2) County will provide description of property.
3) County agrees to maintain for two years after official tumback resolution
by the Cou�ty Boa�d, thereafter all maintenance and other
�esponsibilities are the Townships.
4) Township agrees to hold County harmless and understands that the
County has met all obligations for this road.
(b) Citv Aqreement
1) County 8� City agree on compensation or worfc necessary before
tumtiack.
2) County will p�ovide description of prope�ty.
3) City will be totally responsible for the roadway following the tumback
resolution by the County Board.
4) City agrees to hold County haRnless and understands that the County
has met all obligations fo� this road.
(Rewritten, see JC 3J
2B
�
INTERMODAL
Proaosed Policies:
lt will be Dakota Counfyrs policy to:
. ^ ' ' . '" , ,.. '
. , � . . � .
'rr4:.�ii.:.i'•:??e:•?ii::•i`.:ir,.i?:::.:tii'ir:r{.v.{:n;.y::.'f+::iri.ii:-ii''::'i'�Yi:::�:ivvtiv{i�,.:..,ffj_:.;r :::i-:Li�:�i:iii��"�
•v ".....�.....,..:::w...�:rx0:?Si^iY.Si:/r'ii::�.iiviC:^::..:
}::::ii.:::i::�:'� �� .S v{".:.i' :::..:...:.... .. . . .� r�.. ..:.',�. 1 .
�!?es::of:�rans : .tt2��l+�n<��i�t�c�s�<fii�>�i:if�::�".ratiori:>z�en:::.t;Qt��trc�.c���:�r�.:..:.:: �,. �.
.::.::::.... .::::::....::::.P�.:::::....::.:;:.::.;>:.:::....:::.:::.. . �......:<-:::.::::._:.:_:::.:..-�---....:,:ti...................._: :�
::`;>{:€::>r<:�>=s:>;><::<:<::::::<:��::: �- ..�
. .. ...... ............ .
<.;;siem��`>:=><=:<�`�:>=:<:�:<::::::<>:«::::.:::.:..:.::.::.;:�..::<-::::.:<:..:..::::�::==>=<`:<>:��:��:_:=:::>:<»>:':<��`:�<�>'::`��:�:��:::::�`:�>:>`:;' •°-.. .
:::.::�::.;:.:� �: � ..� ::.:. .:.:::.. .......... . .
9;#�:: Counfjt:raad:;sY .:.::.:..::::t::::....::.;::::::.�:.;:::.�::._:::,::::.:...-:::::.:�:.�::N;:;:,:::.�:....,.,....,....,::::,::::::...:..,.. .
� Strateqies: 1. Evaluate franchise fees for use of public right-of-way for �� ��°
private sector transportation c:omdors (e.g., fiberoptics� - •
pipelines� and communications) � -
2. Designation of transiUtransportation corridors .
Each aty should identify a roadway corrido� as a transit �.�
coRidor ar!d .�sn �rork w;th cie��lop�� to s�t� land i�se�
which are compa�tible to�transit use along this route: -. �-
� Transit compatible land uses include: multi-family _. �
housing, senior housing, day care centers, retail, .'
employment, educational faalities, parlcs, etc.:, iTransit
� incompatible land uses inGude: . car dealerships.; By
_ ' designa6ng a corridor for transit and transit compatible
land uses the i�frastructre required to make transit •
� successful can be built tn the past the County has
exnerienc2 tim�5 vfisn a transii provider has asked for
a� inf�astrutu�e improvement along a Couniy road (i.e.,
bus pullout) and later �emoved transit service from that
roadway. If the cities can work with the County and tfie
transit providers to designate routes .fo� transit then
persons who choose to use transit or a�e dependent
upon transit can live in an area where they will be
gua�anteed transit service.
27
�
0
�
�'''
�
� sir�r-Rn�ca�Fausrh, Inc
LtC[MD
�onr+n �M4 �
Ctw' 0
M!4lMPti1T �
N..�,� L7
.ro.u= «i.i... (}�' �
mr�r ut -
•�1+po�'/wn .
10�01 UiC
Scnle in 1(iles
� � • � {
£7aSiiNG RAtt UNES
DAKOTA C�LTNTY TRANSPORTATiON PLAN
EXISTING RAIL LINES
FiGURE
r�
i
� � �
«s.,c.w�. p RIVEfi TERMINALS
.ec...�nx sQ
' .naor � ro�• �'(�J' •
m�m uK -
��lC�fAlp Cii Si�/ .- . ..� •
e+s�'tK
t
c
DAKOTA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN F�GURL
COMMERCIAL NAVIGATI4N FA�ILITIES � , 2 �
Sf�r Ruscne-Fausd�, Inc � :
a .:
. # :i
I `.
. ., .�,� . •
s
� � � � � �
�
�i.
RAILS, TRUCKS. & COMMERCI_AL NAVIGATION
Pr000sed Policies:
It will be Dakota County's policy to:
R/T.1 evaluate abandoned raiiroad cortidors for potential pr�eservation for future
transpo�tation purposes - i.e., bikeways, trails� light rail, busways, or other
transpo�tation purposes.
(1982 Traruportation Plan) ,. • �
. � . .. .1 -. �. • .. . . n a�.. . . . . . ' 1 . � �s''� .. t ... .. .
.. � . . , i • •.i {., .. �. . " a . ... , • �� , r.�
Strateqies: 1. Identify needs induding signals. rubberized crossings,
sign�ge, �nd grade separted crossings.
2. Include identified needs in the County Capital
;mprovemen* PIaR (GIP�.
3. Recommend that needs identified in the County CIP are
included in the Metropolitan Council's Transpo�tation
Improvement Plan (TIP) and/or requested directly from
the railroad company.
Backaround for RlT.3 - 90 ton routes
Currently, Dakota County constructs County roads to a 9 ton standard. County
roads with a'0 tan segreients includ� CSA�' 32 betwreera �'l� 77 �nd I-35E, CSAH
32 from 35N9/to 1/4 mile eas� and CSAI� 42 from 35Vi/to Apple Valley.
Commercial truck tra�c ls increasing in the County. /ncreased weight loads
cause /ncreased maintenance costs to County roads /n order to connect the
heavy commercial users to the interstate and trunk highway system, staff is
recommending a designation of a limited number of 10 ton county road corridors.
This would facilitate goods movement by enabling the County to post the
corridors and to direct the heavy load, iwin trailer trucks appropriately on the
system. � .
Potential Outcomes of Proposed Policy R/l: 3 Include:
• designation of corridors of %n ton routes linking tf�e commercia!
users and state trunk highway system.
• construction of ten-ton routes on the Cou�rtjr road system.
• locatfon of truck terminals, heavy industrial users, barge terminals
and railroad operations on G/S.
• accommodation of interstate trucks.
• counting of commercia/ vehicles on CouMy roads
28
r
' 43
Sfra#eqY: 1. Wark with cities and MrtDOT to coordinate the
identification and designation of corridors.
.. . . � . �; . . -- � � : , . . ..t, •-_� t.
'1dy ' Y - . . . , y � .
� . , t '
29
�
� . � �� �
" � �
!,, s .
/ '
/ �I� '
_,� < <
r � a
� � �"
�SrF� a �r....
� � �rir�:��� ��:.�,��f�: a� � �
. ��,.
< < ��.�
_ .�.: .�
��
:. ►I�.
��� �
► „^
� . �—� _ - �•��- —
... ..�.,
�„R �, � ,.'
���
.91�.p.,.�
O�f11f�OCR � �
e/BAi�! 7�R OdlYUiM
IIIIf10111�!
Y�tMI�
\� �
OPE81MlE 1�P •
�0' Pnpatod 6y t!� �akata Caunty OHieo of Plann'np, '1994.
�
_ �. Sautoa:1990 Trawl Bahavior Irtu�ntory, Metrn Councd.
RTB Transat Need Indicator
Transit Need Indicator Score
�ow to Hiph
� 00 O
Transit Need Score Composite
lr..a..d..hwet�r 11a.,.11�J..a
, . � ���
. ,�:�
. �
�....�....,�.�..
a
AYrM Y�.Oira Caat�OTa� d P1r.iy,lf4.
0
TRANSIT
Proposed Policies:
It will be Dakota Count}�s policy to: �
.....................................:.:::.: �.:,,:.::::::.:,,,..v,::::v,::..:,.:.,::.,.,:,,..;.::.:,::..::::..,.;:;...;:.,.,...:...;..:.;-�:::::.:::.::::..,.:::..�.:;::-:..,v.:....,,:....:...:.:::.,�
. .,r. ;:r;::.�: �:v! v.;:.!•.:n -:}}..F ....n ..::.............. -
, .. ;r.._.,. ...,4.; ..,-. n..... ;... rv.. r
�. ....... . •.t�G::`6^:�::::::::::::�.;:.:::�.:;.x:`:;
::. :. � ... : . . :. . ' :: � ' �. : �. ,
�@:#hE::�'@ �0�'5�;�f�5�<.. �@5t<�{;;;:i..:;:,;,;:::;:>::��:>�;:�:;::;.::::<��;;
.T`�E�.�:��:�:;�ror�c;�►nth:;ot:�ec:.agenc3e�.�o::.P„!'� ...:..:...:......r...,:.9....::.:�.�.:::.:.,....:�.:.:...p:.._::...::._.:.:::.....,...:..r -
Discussion:
The current transft priorfties for the regfon include the following:
• , , . , . . • _ ._, r�. - . . . •
a. �' Servfce to Transit Dependent Persons (youth, -elderly, zero car
households, low Income, and tf�e_mobiliiy lmpairedJ
` b. - ' Service to Underserved Areas � � � . � ' : � �� : .. _ -
c. Congestion Mitigation/Air Qualify �'� °' -� °� � - •
Strateqies: 1. Encourage the provision of �everse Gommute senrice to
. ••� � the major suburban employers within Oakota Gounty.
2. Work with other agencies to promote conformance with
� the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of
- 1990 as they pertain to transit and transportation system. �
. ,� . �� T�... .- , . .
3. Support services which mee# the mobility needs of
disabled and disadvantaged persons requiring
special"¢ed transportation,
4. Encourage the continued development of a coordinated
and integrated Rideshare matching system.
5. Continue to participate in the planning and development
of light rail transit in the County and the region pursuant
to Minnesota Statute 473.3988 through the Dakota
County Regional Railroad Authority (OCRRA).
.. ... . ....... ... . ... ......
?1R':3::"� work'wi#i
� ;��;?: tfiie ;�ravei`
Strateqy: 1. Woric with local communities and the regional transit
agencies to promote a restructuring of the transit system
to adequately serve the travel needs and desires of
Oakota County �esidents.
30
0
....:.....:. .::,:::::::...::�.;:.:..., ...::::.;:.::::;-:•;::; •.:�::..:.:.�:;.;r.>;:.,...:�.:;::;: �;...,:'::c.,::..r�.: :,.� �-:.x..:..�o:S;:�';..::.::::::::: ::..: ::,:..:::..., .. :.:;..:..;�.:::�:.>.: s:,.;:.:. .:.:.:: ..-:-�:::.S.O:.: �:
TlR �:canstderacquir�n� ad�uate n,�f�t-of.way fior�nuit�ple;�rar��or��.on:::�rtode..;': n: ;:
::��:::>:.: .;:.< :.:::.:::..::.::.:.:�.... :.;...:::....:...:.:.::..;....:._:..:....::.....;.:.: ,..::..;.:.:.,... . _.:: . ::;... n
.. .
:�.��::� .:::.;. >:aiL�recx�nstru�ttor�::�ntl.;r�ew::�nti.s..�nrt�nn.: ects;nr�:Cov.:.ty.;nnads:= :::.. :::::::.::::<.._:��::�::;� .>::::::<:>;
� .:::..:...:...:...::..::::.�:...:..:.............:................ ....................... .......Prol....
:::......:......;.:.;.:.:.;:<.�.:.,:.;:::::_..._;:<.� �.:::<:::::::.::;<.:;:.:::<.:::::::::.:::�::::,,:.<:.<:::::�...::..:<:::..:..::.:.�.:::::.:<.:.��::.:::;:..:::::.:::::>:::::..::..:..::.::.:,;.::..;a:.::...:.::::::..::..::<>:. .::.::.:...
T�R S worK.annth at+es and empfioy.ers.to de�elop:.and �mpterrtent travel.��..:�:mar�d �°��;.;:>�.::
:.: ... ......:..., ..:..:..:....: :... >:
te ie`s�«><::::;::::>::.:;<>:>.:.<.<:>: :::::>:<,::;: ��
� t:: :_ < M ::'s#� . .... . .
�. :�:. .:::::;::: . . �m n . D ..:::.:.:�.:..:;=:::::<;:�.. :... ..
. an� ._ ...... ......... ............... . . .... ..
,: .._: >:;:;:>� . :::.:.:.;::.;::-::::::;::.:.. .... .
..._ .....
.. .:: .::. ... . ... .. . .:. ....... . : . _ ...g.. ........,.,,.. .. .,.,: :.:: ...............:..,......... ..
........................ .....
..:...
..
.... .:::::: ::....:: .:...::::: .
.;:.;.
.::.:.
.: : ::.;;:.;;: : : : : . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . : .: : : : : ::
Strateqv: 1. Support targeting TDM efforts at congested highway .,
corridors and employment concentrations.
_ , . . � . "? „ i ,- VE tr p7r ;, . . ..x ,.
Strateqies: 1. Suppo�t�the fuse of teciinology to increase transit use,
ridesharing, and TDM to�preserve the environment "
2. Encourage and support additional highway and parking
facilities dedicated to high occupancy vehicle (HO� use.
. . . , . ,
3. Support employer programs that encourage transit use
by their employees.
-� - 4. Encourag� an inteRncdal transportation system linking
HOV, bicyGes, and pedestrians to transit facilities. �
i�>for::�a�;sif�:whit�<�::.}`:`:'....>. �`:'::.._:.__.�>::
,_... ....::;>.�>� ��:.;<:::...�;::;::;.;:�::.:.;:;::::::.:� �.;:»>:..::.:::.:::>.:><::<:.::<;� -;:::�;::::� ;.:.: ��::;�;:;:.:>;.:;::: -.:::;::<>�...::;;�:.;-�-:;<;� ��..��:.;:-:;-:..�;:._::,:<::::�-:;:.;::.:;:.;��;::.,:��:::;:::..:::;>:;:::.::.:: :s;:. :.::� .
T1R�:1:O::�encour�ge.tcansit prov�ders�:ft�:�Ce�p.#he::pub�c::rntormed of.>avaitabl�.setiiice_::;:;:��.:;.::`
31
Dako�`a� �`ou�►�` �ikewa� s
Y y
6��rew.ysnram - -
� t,iur.r Coe.aMrekr. . • , �GO �_ N r� � ,` .
1��' Iii�laemb • _p� ,... �-p:... i�;�;i.
�`�" �t:r, _5u
N Iti.rdsY�a�fdr ' , - ';c• �.;,, =r:•
' , , � . ' i _ �� r.Ht ; ���^Y _ .
. ""..,."'"""' r . DOTA :. � �� : - � `; ' r.f � 's' ,: .
� ��H GH �� ` , ::�:
" " . . . ..i ii'i`y � ' '.Yti�-• - � ,}�• ` ' ;,H7:=` ri
... . . . S'_"..'t" '- . _ 3� .;� .
L.,�?i� _ .. . i {
. • . : ,r� . ~ : i , '� ` i ..:7 ,r M .� .
' _- �s � � '.Y � � �� M1Y � i � �. } y � f i
.. . . ~ �;���� :1 Js '� .
. . - .. . w'�Mww�i:;'�':�.�.::�:'���• �`�'•Y �' ;3�i� I - '�'` (�' ,
' . . ,h . '_ 4• •:'�i Ct, � 1�(F
_ ' . Y: _ J 5 :;
. , !y�'_`<� , .
.'t^.
' � � l�
'�)
. . . � •�
. ��` •
a • • ai�" ;1's.i� _ 1': _ '>'. _ •y: _
- . r,;. 'ti-.'i` �ex?
.. . � -� . ' ' . _ • i i�. �; F -'�• -- �;{_ �.i'��r - -^�i :
i�0 . :a«iw. - _ .!'� - '�}! .i:+ _ , t• : f `�.�;- -
. t �t r�1 ya
% .+;: :i,
, = _�-:
�
-h. -
- . ?~;". -.
.:�di'r�: . ..- ,•r- .r``5 i. i;.^,,,_ ~,r�
.. ' Y.. ' . ; rl ", ? i -
.,� •,! ,"_;;:^a-<..; �.,
' - '�+i. : t} - ; � ^'si �? ' i i
' ♦ �' �"'w • r� .' ?
.J
-r
�'
..� -
'�� '�'
..� �
_: nVi/EA
� -- � -
- - - - �'. -
�.-�'- - - -
- `=�
�;
f�=
;.`'� 5,. �r - : �Hav�
��.�x; -�;,, �, :.�::, ^>. nv _
. }-�, - ,{.:Y. . , _
.:�� :r-= -
�� - , .�. :�� - - w � ' �. �.�� . ,.:
`� f =i' - .r
• � 4.
� .y�r:
.� � �
, ��'�N: . - �rJ. :y� •.t"' - �`�`y x � � .
'�,, - •.� ;•;.:i'=t _ :'� _:ti ".i" ry!�✓:� �yr�''FY� ' ' ryyz.c
,, - ..,,�x�: ..ti�..' � _ �-�c ' - . � _ _ - i r^�.,.-�.>se: c -
•K7 ru h .,e,. _' �•:;•x :;,.
':e':#c� �iT:,- f:,E '»'. :,-,..,# Yq�e� :;''T�,::�"' .:i�:: . . �is-. ...!"=_ : !,_..�r_�'
�\(�1'S' :�. t � i.�a-: -. . "`:.✓ti:'.)-�. ' J ': �.: :�:>••'
<`l':r.. }r. �_...'� `' �..� .f �M. � ^{. t".'Zi� �i:i�� _ ' ,•�,�,L�i �' � i;�: :�;i� :..'.�
'�,, - . _ ' § -t, �,Ti i 'iL'jy.� a. ' ::i h:. + 4L r'�4 r • '
i' - i� :� � � � rs Y. '#� � � �r,,t:i. `�i,`. r, . . y • �... ..
.. z�� i A � »'.�- «,�„'�'
_ �.;.' !Ti X' N _ MC*'Y� ^�:, ^ �}' 4} ,! "
}� �.
..BI.F`iN$�Li.E =i "
. •'•.�` , '
a:�'-
. - • '`� ' � 3% 4�;. a;;F�. .�_'�?,- '� ..: : -�v» • - r" �.`y -• ' ��:'-:;t':,i:=F;.
F . ' ; � _
; S• l ,� i . i{3 "r- � �.2� � =':.•C�i � �� :trYfMlsliMw0liKFMC= • '__ . - ��,�.
� f�-. si'. - �:. ::�� y L " {l�.�u:.�+.Y 's't5�"1 . ;.. j� "_ {._ i . ��_ ..
• �.r . w.«% - ~ �+ 'Y ` .. �. � • '+: -: ::'^• . �-.`•. '�
�! . . �� w � "+t':�y. � ,y:;j.: ... j' j ..._ > <7 v*+L.' �.::P .:'
+' - -`., .. 3� : . ,:"-,. :.. ,'� '�"� � i� ; ��d>+ »�` l,t�.^. � i ` P... w u� ..a:•i:
. ;�r. :;+%�;# t' 7:�+%;;nt ' iti � ;i; :.j '. �?"; •• - �. j i5. h••. .
•it�,;. ':�'�,j,; ?;.= 'Y�,.. '-. t�oG" �:i,"=,,. :y. .. '` '``4;�^? �i �:'
,,� -r�� ' � ��..
r f: i= "�r� •�:: �}�? �r ia, . �„' ;�` ..tib^.' +^:::. S i _ . ~l:�z?.t%� '^ i-.; r' j-,;� � �„',. RCISEMO ~�'�.,�.,
' =�` � h. '✓ '" .�. '� � ��
± �'..' - a' !:: f`°�-
.. _ ^i:' • ' ..`.+S . . _... �i1:•` _ .. . ..� ' _. •! ..,:-,."""!t'F4'= ..1..80`..� �c_. . ' _ �" -_
t
"�� _ �. � ``,. �
� �� I � �� _ r<
,4
� � - ' I
��
' '
. :
,
��� � �� ��� i _ ..p_ � O
� �'.
��, � � �}^ ��
• \ -- - ,✓�
_ � ��. � �
�
.� v
i� � _ �-
�
`� ��., � 6 �
� � i
�� ��� .``;�.,j � .�:�.
����� �� s� �*
��1������ �-� �:�cy�.�
�..
� =�ca� ��
� �/ ,.�- �.— .�� � .;. ,,
:�'R =�!i �'�'�
,: �ri,� .�.,
�
BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIANS
Proposed Policies
1t will be Dakota Count}rs policy to:
BP.1 create a County Bikeway System and a regional trail system which will foRn
a framework to serve Countywide needs such as access to major County
facilities, activity centers� employment centers, and post secondary schoois,
�� �� and which provides oonnections between municipalities and to adjacent
' counfies. - -� - . � � • . - ,-- . . =
. - - - . y .. �
• StrateQies: •� �� 1. Caordinate the development of the County Bikeway
, � a System with the ezisting and�planned facilities of other
�' units of govemment ; .
2. Encourage the canstruction of needed State and local
. bikeways within the County_ � ~ -
3.� Provide paved shoulders on both sides of the roadway
� along the County Likeway System.
_.. _ _ •� < .
4. Restrict the�separated paths on the County Bikeway
,System to bicycle and pedestrian traffic.
` �` .�. - .
5. Provide bicycle parking faal'fies at all County-owned
facilities. • � - . . � .
6. Woric with the appropriate agencies to locate bike
racks and lockers at transit hubs and pa�ic and-ride
faaliiies. �
BP.2 prepa�e a five-year bikeway capital improvement program that is coordinated
with the five-yea� road construction programs of the County, State and local
units of govemment
Strateqies: 1. Review and update the Bikeway Capital tmprovement
Program annually, and the Bikeway Plan every five
- years o� as required by ISTEA.
2. The County will review requests for system changes or
additions during the annual CIP review.
BP.3 consider the following factors when designing bikeways: MnDOT and
AASHTO standards, timing for road construction, level of safety, availability
of right-of-way, cost, and daily traffic volume.
32
Strateaies: 1. Include bikeway design for County and Municipal
' Bikeways along County roads in the initial desig�
phase of County road construction projects, consistent
' with the County Bikeway Plan, and with approved
�equests from local un'its of govemment
2. Provide design criteria to other units of govemment
with regard to tocal bikeway development in County
road right-of-way.
3. Require County approval rega�ing the location and
, design of local bikeways within County road right of-
way. .
•�--• � 4. Encourage local communities to provide design and
engineering for bikeways on the County system within
local road rights-of way. - -
BP.4 Ensure that traffic controls and signage on the County Bikeway System will
be in accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Unifonn Traffic Control
, Devices. . . , .
BP.5 Uss ttle PJli�rescta Deaact�nent of Transportab�n's ��ll��� or R.aSHTO's
Standard Specifications for Construction, wnenever possible. �
StrateQies: 1. Require that all contractors use bikeway construction
- practices acceptable to the County Engineer.
2. Require that all materials used in construs�ing
bikeways be fumished from reliable sources capable of
producing and delivering uniformly acceptable work.
3. Require tfiai all worfc be adequately inspected to
assure compliance with contract spe�cations.
. BP.6 Require the locat govemrrients to provide routine maintenance, through
agreements of off-road paths on the County Bikeway system.
Strateqy: 1., Periodically inspect shoulders for needed maintenance
on County Roads designated as bike �outes
Submit grant applications for bikeway funding assistance to all available
Federal, State, and regional funding programs.
33
Existins� Policies
(Blkeway Plan)
C�eate a County Bikeway System which will fortn a framework to serve
Countywide needs such as acce�s to major Caunty faal'rties, activity centers,
employment centers, and post secondary schoals. and which p�ovides
connections between municipalities and to adjacent counties.
(Rewritfen as BP.1) .
Coordinate the development of the County Bikeway System with the existing
and planned facilities of other units of govemment
(Strategy for BP.2)
•' Prepa�e a five-year bikeway capital improvemerrt program that is '
coordinated with the five-ysar road construction programs of the County�
State and local units of govemment -
(Rewritfen as BP.2)
Review and update the Bikeway Capital Improvement Program annually,
and the Bikeway Plan every five years or as rege�ired by tSTEA. The
County will review requests for system changes or additions during the
annual CIP rev�ew.
(Strat�gy for BP.2) _
Encourage the construction of needed State and local bikeways within the�
County. _
(Strategy for BP.2
Constnact County bikeways within the �ounty road right-of-way to the fullest
extent possible. �
�ik�wva�-sys�ea�
(moved to Railroad section)
Consider the following factors when designing bikeways: MnDOT and
AASHTO standards, timing for road construction, level of safety, availability
of right of-way, cost, and daily traffic volume.
(Rewriften as BP.3)
Include bikeway design for County and Municipal Bikeways along County
roads in the initial design phase of County road construction projects,
consistent with the County Bikeway Plan, and with app�oved �equests from
local units of govemment.
(Rewritten as Strategy for BP.3J
Ensu�e that traffic controls and signage on the Caunty Bikeway System will
be in accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Unifonn Traffic Control
Devices.
(Rewritten as BP.4)
34
,
� Provide design criteria to other un'its of govemment with rega� to local
bikeway development in County road �ght-of-way.
(Rewrliten as Strategy for BP.3)
Require County approval rega�ding the location and design of locai
bikeways within County road right-of-way.
(Rewrftten as Strategy for BP.3)
Encourage local communities to provide design and engineering for
bikeways on the County system within local road rights-of way.
(Rewrftten as Strategry for BP.3) � .
Provide paved shoulders on both sides of the roadway along the County
Bikeway System. � . -.. � . `� . _ �-r =. . .. _ .. , .
(Strategry for BP.1J w •- .
Restrict the separated paths on the County Bikeway System to bicycle and
pedestrian traffic. � � � .�:, . .. , � _ .
(Strategy fa� BP.1) . � � �
Provide bicyde paricins faaf�ties at ap County-ovtimed facilities.
(Strategy for BP.1j � �- .
Worfc with the appropriate agencies to locate bike racks and lockers at
tr�nsit hubs and park and-rid� facilities.
(Strategy for BP.1J � ' ` • " ' -
Use the Minnesota Department of Transportation's (MnDOT) or AASHTO's
Standard Speafications for Construction, whenever possible.
(Rewriiten as BP.5) •
Build bikeway p�ojects in conjunction with County highway construction,
whenever possible.
(Moved to fundiraga
Require that all contractors use bikeway construction practices acceptable to
the County Engineer.
(Strategy for BP.S) ' ,
Requi�e that all materials used in constructing bikeways be fumished from
reliable sources capable of producing and delivering uniformly acceptable
work.
(Strategy for BP.S
Require that all woric be adequately inspected to assure compliance with
cont�act specifications.
(Strategy for BP.S
Requi�e the local govemments to provide routine maintenance, through
agreements of off-road paths on the County Bikeway system.
(Rewritten as BP.6J
35
Periodicalty, inspect shoutders for needsd maintenance an County Roads
designated as bike routes .
jStr�fegy fo�' BP.6� :
Submit �rant applicatzons for bikeway funding assistance to all available
Federal, State, and regionai funding programs. :� ,
(Rewritten as BP. Tj , ,
Specifjr that the casts of the canstruction of bikeways not on the approved
County Bikeway Sys#em wi11 be #he responsibiliiy of the [ocal community.
(Moved #o FundingJ . � , , .
Dakota Count}r will provide 100°k of the funds (less any appiicable County
grants} for #he canstruee:tiian of fhe Counijr 8ikeway System.,_ �: .,
(Moved #o Fundfng • . - - .. -. -
Costs of engineering services for bikeways on the County System wiit be
eligible fot funding by the County.
(Moved'to Funding �
Oakota County will fund a separate path on the County Bikeway 5�ystem
oniy on one side af fi�e roadway. Shatilciers on both" sides o� roadways wiii
be funded, where designated and appropriate. _ �
jMoved ta FuRding - , _ . , . � .: , , ; .� � .
t• n
_ ,�1••9 .e, � . •
Dako#a Gounty wil! share the casts {tess anytapplicabie gran#s} %r overlay or
reconstruction of Caunty bikeways: 55�o County. 45% local.
(htoved to Funding . - � , . ,
. • � . ,. . . . Yr .
�36
.,
� PLANNING/COOPERATION
Pr000sed Policies:
It will be Dakota Counfy�s policy to:
PC.1 periodically review and update the Transportation Policy Plan.
(1982 Transportation Policy Plan, #1)
PC.2, t,. involve affected units of govemment,and transit providers in the �annual
� development of the Capital Improvement Program. �(Appendix 2)..
(1982 Transportatfon Policy Plan, #2J � ` ` � '
. Stiateqv: � 1. Develop a transportation database to assist in the
��_,� planning, design, and implementation of transpo�tation
� � facilifiies in the County. -
F�.� soliat inp�t �om and i�volv�'a!f intE�ested parties in th� ala�ning ard de�ig�ing
of construction projects on the County roadway system.
(1982 Transportation Policy Plan, #7J ' :
'^ StrateQv:`� ��� ''�' 1 Meet with developers and �the cities when appropriate.
Discussion:
A Travel Demand Forecasting model will be developed as part of the
overal/ Transporfation Plan. The results of this modeling effort will provide
an indication of the 5-year and 20-year roadway needs of the County.
PC.S provide input to the Metropolitan Council and MNDOT regarding County
transportation issues via ti�e T�ansportation Advisory Board (TAB).
(1982 Transportation Policy Plan, #6)
...�::. ..:,,....::.:..::,:;:.::.�:.....:::.:�.;:-::::;.� :. . .:.::.:..:.::.::..: .. .::.:.::::. .:::.:..:. .:... .:: :.:..�::..�: ::: :::.:..: ::..:::.::::::..:,.:::..::::: :.:::. ::..,:.:.: :.:.::. ..: ..:.:. .:.. ..:::...
. .
,...;:-� ::::<.....:.;:....:..,...:�..: ....:,.::::,;,:.......�.:`-::;:::,:.,.:;.:_.:...., .;.;.�.,...:� ; ::.:. ..:: :.::.:�.::..::;�.:..�:.;;<:.::.:;,�:::.:::.:,...;�<: .:,:.;::«...:..::.:e..:,�..�,:>c:� ::;:::i`::<v ��:� �':?.'E
C_6 �p�ttidpate vrt�sfate,.:reg�ona[, and iocal. committees r�garding �oc�rtty :
:;;.e:`.
<:::frair�:;
::.:o'_: �issu s:><=::��. :
: ....
:� _:;.; ::.._:.:.. .
r#aft. . ..... .. . .................................... ..�----�--�-�---. .... ...
.........
.
. ::::.;:.:. ::::::<
� .: .::.:. :::;:�.
.;..
::::..
.... .:..: .::-;::. :::..;:::::.::;::::.:�::::>
. ...::.... .:::: . .... . ...:: � .............. ..
.
. .. .
:::.
:..:......;:... : .
.::»:>;:::;:::.
. .. .....:.:.:
. ..�.::..�:::�::� �
.;:.:_-.::::::::..;;..
.:;..�.:..
.
.::::.._.:.� ::.:::.... .::::;.:..:::... . .:.:.:..:::.:.::.. . ...
�
37
it�tio�:;witii�:�levartif�-r'``;{:��ii�nal�����::::::.���<:::�:�:: �:`��::
>:;;;:.: ...:.:::.....:�.:...�:..:.�:..:�:.: �9::.:.:
iecia���s�udies=:�re::�eedsd:><::::::::<:::�::;����::�::;�::�� ��;:�:::::
. . .................. ........................... .................. ....... ...�--. . ...
PC.9 coordinate efforts with the Metropol'itan Counal Office of Transit Operations
{MCTQ), the Mi�nesota Valley Transit {MVTA), Dakota Area Transportation
Services (DARTS)� and ather tra�sit providers #o develop strategies for transit in
the County. . -
(�'982 Transportatfon Policy Pian, #3) '
Discr�ssion:
Descr�bed below are specffic local plan content requiremenis �at in ma�y
cases�wf!! be needed to demonstrate ce�nsistee�cy with the revised
transpo,rtation system pian. '
• A minor arter�al sys#em fhat serves shari trips .
• Provisio� for queuing vehicJes on laca/ stre�ts waf#ing at metered
interchanges on fhe metropolitan highway system �
� A land use component that includes specific land use types and
densiiy fnformation ta ensure consisfency with highway capacities artd
design recommendations recorded In this gutde.
• Highway and fransit camponenfs that are cansisten# with �/re highway
capacitfes and designs recommended in thls guide.
• A transif companerrt consisten# with ihe Council's ir^artsit palicy platt
• Trave!-demand managemeni strate,gies must be pu# in plac� to
discaurage s�n�Je-accupant auto use duringr peak periods for ihase
communifies in highly conges#ed corridors '
• Goods movement components for metro cerrters a»d regional6usiness
concentrations
• Pedesfriarrlbicycle element
� LRT station are land use plans for cities in I-35W and Certtral LRT
corridors that carrsider development of trarrsit - and pedestrian -
oriented mixed use nodes along LRT alignments.
•' Local goverrrment responsible for imp/emertting transporfation syster»
management strate,gies
38
(1982 Transportatfon Policy Plan, �.SJ �
39
Existin� PolicieslResolutions
(1982 Transportation Folicy Plan}
F
{1} The Transportation Poiicy Plan wi1l be reviewed and updated annually.
(Rewrii#en, see PC 1J
(2) Dakota County will develop a system to improve the storage and retrieval of
records reta#ing #a Couniy roads and right-af way.
(Rewriiten, see PG 5)
(3) Dakota Counfiy will coondinate efforts with the Metropalitan Transit Commission
{MTC} in develaping stcategies for transit in the Caunty. �
(Rewrif#en, see PG 10)
(4) Dakota County's priorities for roadway construcEion are �eflected in the 5-year
� construction program. .
(Rewriiten, see PC.2j
(5) Dakota Caunty witt meet with oiher units of govemment, in order #o caordina#e
efforts in providing roads and transit, ,
(Rewritten, se� PG 92j
(6) Dakota County wili pravide input #o the Metropoli#an Counci€ and MNIDgT -
regarding County transpartation priorities via the Transportation Advisory Baard.
jRewriifen, see PC 6j �
(7} Dakoia County witl hald public meeii�tgs ar►d �adhe�e to State and Federal
requirements, to solicit camments regarding construction an the County road
network.
(Rewrirten, see PG.3j
(8) Dakota County will make available ta the pubtic ail poticies, guidelines, and
, plans conceming Caunty coads.
(Moved #o Public Participation}
40
t.�
LAND USE
Back�rround
One of the fundamental relationships in the study of transportation is the
linkage between land use and transportation. •�-
The development of land for a parficular use results either in the
generation of new trips originating from that area or new t�ips attracted to
that area, or both. The development of /and in an urban anea .thus cr+eates
new trave/ demands and, consequently, a need for transporfation' facilities,
whefher in the form of new infrastructure or more e�cient operation of
existing facilities.. � . - . „ . , . ..
Due to the relaiionship between land use and transporiation �pJanning for
both� should be intec�rated. Unfortunately, the jurisdictiqns responsible for
orre are n�i responsibfe for �e o£�e�: ��aa g�rree�af cifees a�td �o�nsias�s� 6�ave
jurisdiction over land use through their zoning and comprehensive plans
and coun�ies, states, and thQ federal government have jurisdiction over
transporfation. �urrently, there is no�institutiona! mechanis�n to �
encourage or force these groups to plan togrether. ��
Proqosed Policies:
�L.U�2: >_;
�1
DJscusslon:
The Cont/guous P/at Or�dlnance Includes ':.. Land use Impact of
development on the County road system." as a faci�or of Countyw/de
slqnfflcance whlch can be used by the Plat Comm/sslon when r+evlew/n�
proposed p/ats The H/ghway Depertment and the Offlce of P/anning.,: :�, °.,.
bel/eve fhat the trafflc generated by the land use proposed for the plat and
the degree !�o whlch the local roadway system can accommodate �hese =
trlps should be cons/dered and requlred durfng the revlew process By •�
doJng thls tfte County can work wfth loca/ munic/palftles i�o encourage
them to des/gn 3 constr,uct a loca/ roadway system whlch acts i�o support �
the citfes development and the County roadway system. The construction ;. z
of an integrated local roadway system wlll help to ensure ihat the tmobllfty_:Y=
function of the Cou�y roadway system fs maiM�ineal. �, ,,,�. �„ ���
. . • _ ., . .. . . . . . . - . ti„`-t .� , .'.a:: >. i ;, � _
z: . ' ..' . � ... _ , . • z � .. . . , • .. . . .: - _ >. - , - � —
�
Discussion:
The land uses which are /ocated close to County roads have an enormous
impact of the amount of tra�c on and fhe amount of access needed to. �e
County road. Since the cities contro/ the type of Iand use that is located
near a County road the County would Iike to be proactive in working wi�
the cities to determfne which type of land uses are best situated adjacent
to a Couniy road (e.g., commerciaUindustrialJ and which /and uses are best
situated farther away from a County road (e.g., single family homes).
Working with fhe cities early on to develop some guidelines for
developments adjacent to County roads may help the County and the cifies
avoid problems in the future. .
42
�
Dlscusslon:
Because the citles and i�ownshlps conbnl land use and �e Couniy controls
fhe Coun#y irensportaiiort sysiem fher�e are i3mes when the land use
permltted by the city and �e raadway bulit by the Cour�ty are not
compatlble. Thfs sifua�an occurs, for example, when a schao! �,s lacated
alang a Courrly road. The school /oca�res along the County r�cad #o recelve
the benefifs af the accesslbtlify provided by fhe Couniy rr�ad, but the raesulf
Is also a safety issue due to the proxlmlty of the schoal t+o the road. A
sfmllar sftuatian occurs when a Caur�iy raaad is expandeaf.� Fersons,
buslnesses, or ed'ucationa! instftutfons which Oocated' e/ong the road years
ago may have been conipatJb/e wiiti �fre roadway, but are now
Incompatlble because fhe roadway has changeai. When these si#uatfans
occur the County Is wl!/ing ia work wftfi the cttfes, townshlps, and p%per#y
owners fo ai#empt #o develop ways fo /essen the impact of this
lncompatfblli#y on both the roadway and on those occupyfng the land
adjacent to fhe roadway.
�13
�
,
� • �::'� � ._ • . ' ,.. . ° .. ... ._ . , _.. .
t �.. • : . _• � . -. " �
�
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Backsrround
The aititudes, suqgestlons, and concerns of cltlzens must be hearal. There must
be early opportunlfles for these contrlbutlons Through strengrthened
communlcatlon at a/I levels, confllcts beiween dffferfng groups can be IdentJfed
and addressed.
The goal ls to develop a co�nuous publfc lnput process that lnwlves the publlc
and ldentlfies and addresses crftical issues beginning in the proJect developme�
process A contfnuous publfc input process ls needed to receive lmproved public
information and feedbacl� create a inore informed public, develop partnerships
wifh commun�ties and loca! governments, �and provide increased advocacy.
_ :;• . ,
Proposed Policies: , .
It will be Dakota Count}rs policy to: �
. . . .:�,• .
Strate4ies: 1. involve the public in the preliminary discussion�
information gathering, design, construction. and feedback
of projects. ;,, � . . , '
2. Hold preliminary open houses on highway projects.
3. Conduct pubiic information meetings �n a� "as-ne�ded°
basis to seek public input to assist in defining the scope
of a proposed p�oject.
4. Set up commun'rty wo�icshops. Obtain early input for
County decisions by invi6ng County constituenaes and
the public to leam about and discuss County issues in a
variety of settings and fonims.
5. Hold public meetings.
6. Produce a variety of regular publications that increase
the public's knowledge and understanding of County
issues, and infonn them of County activities and
decisions.
7. Facilitate getting information about County issues to the
public through the news media. Undertake the selective
use of cable N and local publications, and facilitate
44
F,
communication by County Commissioners through local
media in their districts.
8. Make comment cards available to the public.
9. Respond to calls from the public reganding roads and
_ intersections in a reasonable timeframe.
�
10. Involve the public in the Capital lmprovement Plan
process. Notify the public of upcoming projects for the
�ext five years. Receive comment on the upcoming
projects. v w . . , - .
., . a�,. ... .r _ , � - .
11. Provide the opportun'ity for o�going atizen involverrient in ��
Cou�ty Policymaking through advisory bodies that
develop recommenda6ons and advise the County on
major policy issues.
92. Increase interaction and dialogue with local govemments
on day-to-day County problems, and obtain their views
ea�ly in the process of developing County policies.
Stratecties: 1.� Hold open houses. �-' '���'� `
2. Set up communify worfcshops
3. Hald public meetings
4. Produce a rariety of regular publications that increase the
public's knowledge and understanding of County issues,
and infarm them of County activities and decisions.
5. Make comment ca�ds available to the public.
PP.3 adhere to State and Federal �equirements in soliating comments regarding
construction of the County transportation network
(1982 Transportation Policy Plan, #1J
PP.4 make available to the public all policies, guidelines, and plans conceming
County roads consistent with the Minnesota Data Practices Act.
(1982 Transportation Policy Plan, #2J
45
0
�
Eacis#ins� Policies
(1982 Tiansporfation Policy Flanj
(1} Dakota County wiN hotd public meetin�s and adhere to State and Federal
requirements in soGciting comments regarding construction of the County raad
ne#wo�ic.
{Rewrftten, see PP.3)
(2) The County will make available to the public all paliaes, guidelines, and plans
car�cemmg Caunfy roads.
(Rewrfften, see PP.4)
46
�
15. OPERATIONS/MAINTENANCE
0
0
�
0
OPERATIONS/MAINTENANCE.
Proposed Policies:
lt will be Dakota Count}rs policy to:
O/M. 1 impose weight restrictions on County roads to prevent significant stnactural
de#eriora#ian. - - .
(1982 Transportation Pian, #1 and Resolution 89-139) �_.. ..
� . . .. _ . _ ...: f.` i- . ,. , ,
Strateqv: 1. County Board has given autharization to County
, - Engineer.
S#ratec�v� 1. Consider pfeseroation and rehabititatian projects which
in�^.,rease effeciive muttimodat and intermadal �
accessibiliiy, and serve to enhance historic,•scenic,
recreationat� and/ar cuttural resources. -
Exis#inst Policv and Resolcrtion • �
{1982 Transpor#ation Policy Plan) . � � .
(1) Dakota County will enforce weight restrict�ons on County roads ta prevent
significant s#ntcturai deteriorat�on.
- _ - - (Retained, see O/M.9) �
(2) Resolutian 89-139
Until rescinded by further Board action, the Dakota County Engineer, pursuant
to #he provisions of Minn. Stai. Sec. 163.02, subd. 3, is autharized to impase
weight and load restrictians on highways under County jurisdiction whenever
any highway; by reason of �lima#e and road conditians, wilt be damaged due ta
excessive loading.
(RewritEen, see OlM.1 �
4T
Y
.... ...: .. :. .. .. .: ..:: :. :.: ..: ..::: .. :.:::: :...,,...:,:: : •::�::: �;>r.::.:� •.;�:::.:. y:.; .,.:..; �:..; .. .
......:....::......:�..: •:.�..:�.. ..
.. .. .. ., . . : �: . . . .. ., .. .. . . .:. .y.;•.. :::: .. .
��j�( ::• •f•: • : ••>:•:>::w..•..:::•-::•:::; • . ':::�3;:'.: ��<:a:�:�::�:��:::`:i=?;;`:';: �';;:;:;::;:;':�: � ;::;:;::. ::.
. :: :: -. .:. . ..:.. :.::!•. . ' .:�':•::.:.•:.::.:::
..: . . ..,-.:ti.:•.
: . :. . ..�, : . . .. . : ...... .: :::.::.>:�::. :.:_.�:•...: �:.:�.:".': �::�+ `''/.:'�':•..:';.;•
:�:•: : .:?:�:.+''::.::::;•:::::.:.::•.:.•:••. .�.i. r::�•:. "...' r:'�>::+:✓.:•:.;...�..�'�'" ' : ;f:::.:;':;.;...::::•:.:.:•,•;%:;.;'.
. � �rI!�iw�.... .: ' � . ... . r• •.'�.:.::,•::.:.. , t"",'-`':'••:+:'.�:::
RAFFtC: S G ....... .:::. ... ....
T . ;..... ..::<.>::.,<.:.:.::.::...:....;.:..: ..........,,.:.: . �.. >,�
...... ............ ...:..: ,:,,.:;.,.::.;-::. ...... ..:....... .w.:..,;:.::,.>::.v..:�..r.<<�:.::<::�::.:.:::::::.:
Proposed Policies:
It will be Dakota Countyrs policy fo:
O/M.3 place and operate traffic control devices according to standar�ds as stated in the
Highway Traffic Regulation Act (MS Ch. 169) and Minnesota Manuai on
Unifortn Traffic Control Devices. . , -. . � . .. - - .. _ .. .
(1982 Transporiatio� Policy Plan, #1 and Resolutio� 87-137) � '
::?- . . � � - . .. - � - � .
O/M.4 dean, paint, and relamp traffic signals (not induding the attached street lights)
at all intersections with County highways.
(Resolution 82-341, #4) . .
O/M.5 maintain signal controller and ha�dware at all intersections with County
highways, except those with trunk highway$. �
(Resolution 82-�4'�, #4) , .
�::>::x:«�>:>:
�:»:s;<t ;:,:.`».::::�:�:>`:>:>"`:::::r:;;:=�>�:�:;.;;'
�:::::=;:::_>�>':�f�iri �......
.;;:.:;:: :::r:::.::: ::.:.� ::::: ::::::::::.:.....�::: ::.: :::::::::.:..:
:'�::�i�.
�= ::: .:::;::::::<.::.:�-::.:..;�-<::> ::.:.::...:::.;::;::-;:::-::: :.:::..
:::: :.::::::::: ::::::::.::::: ;::.:.: :::.::.. - . .---.:.. . .. ..
.:.......:.....;.:: �--��-�;:::.....
�S:<>� a�ni��n::�ew::�r�d;:��as�iri"�:;eiiier,"er�..:;»vei�i�fe':'"��:��::.�:�`::�::`:`�-: _ .,,.w.n ............................
:��JtII....�n .:..::::.�::::.:. ....:.....::.::..�::..9:.:.:�:::.�::._:�::.::�:�Y.::.:..:.._:-...:.:�..P��p.:::._::::-v:..Y.,..:.:::::.�
Discussion:
Travel time is a critica/ factor for commuters considering the use of transi�
Through utlizing signal pre-emption sysfems transit vehicles are able to
move more quick/y to the express portion of their route. Examples of
County roads which are currently used by transit vehicles and which could
benefit from the use of a signal pre-emption system include Cedar Avenue,
Cliff Road, and Pilot Knob Road.
O/M.8 maintain tra.ffic control signals unde� the jurisdiction of cities within the County.
Strateqies: 1. Maintenance activities shall occur after the County and
the affected City have entered into a cost sharing
agreement. The County shall be reimbursed by the Ciry
for any costs encountered. The agreements shall include
but not be limited to the following.
.r
�
0
�
� • The County will �espond to requests for assistance
subject to the limitation imposed by availability of
manpower, equipment, and replacement parts and the
condition of the County road system.
� • The County may discontinue maintenance of City -
•• k� tra�c signals if the County determines that it is no
longe� feasible. Such teRnination of maintenance
shall be effective one year after the date of written
. notice to the City.
-'' • 4::Ail costs incuRed by the County in conjundion with the
maintenance services provided shall be reimbursed by
the Gty and shall take into account direct labor, fringe
benefits, ovefiead, equipment costs, and materials.
• Any maintenance activity which requires outside �•.
contracting shatl be coordinated and o�ered by the -
Cit�r. The County may assist in i�s{�ection oi suc#i
. • activity. .
• Ar�a�ge;r.entis •�th the Citi�s �hal� provid� fo� a�y and
all liability issues in such a way that the County is ,
compensated for increased liability to the County and
or County employees. � _ .
(Resolution 87,522, #3)
Strateqies: 1. Maintenance activities shaA occur after the Couniy and
the State have entered a cost sharing agreement The
County shall be reimbursed by the State fo� any costs
encountered. The agreements shall include but not be
limited to the following:
�
49
a
0
.-�CC. . . _ ` � ♦ . • � )4 � �F ,
Existins� Policv And Resolutions �� - -
(1982 Transportafion Policy Plan 8 Counfy BoaiJ Resoluiionsj
(1) Dakota County will place and operate traffic control devices according to
standards as stated in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Controi Devices and the -
N�ghway Traffc Re�ufatio� Act. -
(Retained, see O/M.3) � � , .
(2) Resolution 87-137 •
Staff is directed to prepare qualifying criteria which would identify circumstances
whereby traffic control signais may be needed, taking into account elements of
established wa�rants; speciaf pedestrian crossing di�culties; intersection �
spacing; and funding issues.
(Retaaned, s�e O/11A.3)
(3) Resolution 87-522
Dakota County will maintain traffic control signals under the jurisdiction of cities
within the County. Maintenance activities shall occur afte� the County and the
affected City have entered an agreement The County shall be reimbursed by
the City for any costs encountered. The agreements shall inGude but not be
limited to the following:
1. The County will respond to requests fo� assistance subject to the limitation
imposed by availability of manpower, equipment, and replacement parts and
the condition of the County �oad system.
2. The County may discontinue maintenance of City traffic signals if the County
detertnines that it is no longer feasible. Such termination of maintenance
shall be effective one year after the date of written notice to the City. ,
50 .
�
3. All costs incurted by tfie Caunty in canjunction with the maintenance
setvices provicfed shalt be reimbursed by the City and shall take into account
direck labor, finge benefit,s, ovefiead, equipment costs, and matenais.
4. Any maintenance ac�iiv�fy which requires ou#side contracting shati be
coordinated and or�dered by the City. The County may assist in inspec�ion of
such activify.
5. Atrangements with the Ci�es shall provide for any and ai( liabiiity issues in
such a way that the County is campensated for increased liability to the
Coun#y and or County emplayees. : � ,
(Retained, see O/M.41 .
F. ., . ...-.. ..,;;>. �5^'�'�; `}r . , .. .4 _
(4) Resolution 82-341 � ,..,�_ • � ..
Dakota Coun#y assumes a portion af the financial responsibility of energy costs
for tra�c signal aperation�.nat induding the street {ights attached to the tra�c
signals, at all intersections with county highways. The Count�s partiapation is
i�a�ed or� the n�€nber of Cour�#�t "tegs' entering eac� inters�ctian in propor#ion to
the total number of "legs" eniening ti�e iniersection. � �
{Rewritten, see F,2�
The local unit� of gz�vemment are expected to take l�inancial tesponsibili#y far
the energy cos#s of all other "legs" enfering the intersecfion (i.e.� localy state� -
. etc.). " . . ,
.. ._ (Rewritten, �see F.2� '
C(ean, paint, and relamp traffic signais (no# inciuding the attached street lights}
at all intersections with� County highways.
(Rewritten, see 01M.4)
�a'sniain signat controiler and hardware at a�i( intersec�ons �vith Caunty
highways, except #hose with trunk highways. ,
(Rewritten, see 41M.5} �
Praposed Palicies:
!t wi11 be Dakofa Coun#}�s policy to:
QIM.10 participate in the instailation casts of street lights 4NLY where they afe
attached to tra�c signals on County highways, The lights will be financ�d on
the same basis as #he instatla#ion of tra�c signals.
(Resolution 82-312)
51
::.: , � �;: .:::,--,: : ;�;.>;:: : - -
..:-. ::..:
:..:� ..:.:,...... �::>...
...:.. �
:: :. . . ::��::. : . : � ..,:....,.`;... >-� <:,:;:.;-,> .,.:: .-.
....... . ..
:;::�� ::Rnads�:�t��e'ltit�ii>��::.:...:.:.:�.:::..s:e:�:.:.:=-��s�A:;::<;:_:.:<�:�:::::;::�:;.;;<::.::;�::.:: �
.:. ..:..:..:.
::..;;. ::; :;:: :. � �
.. . :.. :...:.: . .
.;-:.;. .:<.:;::� ::.:: :..:.::::.::..�5!.:.:.:�:::....:. . .::. ....::.: ..�..:.:: .: ..::. ...:.:_... .:.:...:�:. . .. :.::.::::.----- ::.:......-�---:.. ...... .. .
Existin� Policv and Resolution
(1982 Transportation Policy Plan & County Board Resolutions)
��� . .
, � -
(2) Resolution 82-312
Dakota County will participate in the installation oosts of street lights ONLY
where they are attached to traffic signals on CourYfy �ighways. -The lights.will be
financed on the same basis as the instal(ation of traffic signals.
(Retained, see O/M.10) ' •
:;�:��.� �� - _
:P::.::R�- '�'S.>'.'.�:'�'::�:�::::::-:�:.�::`<�`�:<'�'=:=>��;:=:;`_>;:<:;:::;;`:'.�_`;:::�::;:::;`:<;::>=:�:>::::;.:::.;:::;::::;>:�;�:::::;:::���::��:'`��:�::�<�:::<�>:::�:>::::;=�::::>:�>'�.::<:>;��;<:;:=:::::<�:::"�.::�;:�;:::::;;:;.}.:.::::;;;:::_<:�:;<�:��:::;�<:::��;::::>�::::::::<;_;:::::�;
:.:::E.:..M.: ::.; � ..... ........ . .........;: ::: :.::.::.... .�. �.:::.:.:...;:.;:.::.;:.::.::.
Proqosed Policies:
lt will be Dakota Counf}rs policy to:
O/M.13 require a pennit to pa�ticipate in the "Adopt-A-Highwa�' prog�am.
(Resolution 91-412)
O/M.14 require fees where applicable, prior to before issuing permits. See appendix
for fee schedule.
(Resolution 91-215)
:: . _: .:.:..:.:.:.:: . .:. .,....:.;;:;;� :<:... :<:;�:»:�::>�.;:. ..:;�::._::.::;:::;;:>:;::>�^;�...::>: .,.:;:::;;::>:: �:�: .;;::�:�::;:::,::::.;a::<e`.�:,.::oun��,:`:.><:. �::>;:::
::.. . . ..:
..
:O/M:'f5_.::require:a.peiinif�for:_all_:o�enrveight:and oversized toads moving� _v.: :r�.;: .. � .._ty
.: .. . ; .:.
:. . :::_...; �:;.: .. .:::: � .>:.:<::_:::::�:..:.:>:. .
.. � . .� :�. . .
� : :::::<�fiigti:wayS; .. ..:. . .:..::: ::::�. ::��::<::<:::� :::: .:::::..:� .:� . . .
.;: ;: . :.... :. . . . :. .;:. :.:.; ..:. .. . :::::: : .:::.::::.-.:
.. :....... :. . :::>;..:�<::..,:.:.;.:::;::..;;:..::�<:;� =����->-PJ;>:_:<.::::<:: :
,: ::....::: . .: � . -�:.:.;-:�<:;. �>... ....::::;;:;._:.::,..r:.:;;:::.: . _ . . .:. :.
:>;:. .>:: ;::: ;� .: :: �scvssw :�n:tiie; �1982�:Trans o . afro�t:> :-; an :>::>;: �.. �:::::>:<:::::: :::. � :.. �:: ::.. �:;. ::<:'<;:�:::;::>::::::;:=::�::
.::;<:::::::. .(from..d _.... .. � ..::.:.:...:.. .. � ��>� ��� .... . .
.: .. . : .: . : : : : . .:;.; -;:::::::: ;:
�OfliA::������
(from discussion in the 1982 Transportation Plan)
52
�
�
�
(from dlscusslon !n the �982 Transportatlon Plan)
(from dlscusslon ln the 1982 TrensportatJon Plan)
Strat�rnr. 1. Forward to appropriate city staff. �'�"' "
� :;:.>.;::;:;:,::>::;:.::;�.::..;
:::,:.;:, r.:.;:..:;,��<:..:.
: ..:.}::: :-;::.:::;;; ::::
�:>=:;�� -«a;-:<::::.:;
_<..�,.,. ..
.....:...:..::...:..:..:.:.::::: :.
: t���a: �:<�<:::�:���:{'::><<:�:::::::�:><::'::::::.::::::<>:><�:':�`>::::'�:�:��`:<
: �i;:�:::.::: ;::::�<:>::.,:�iiio>.�::__ir�ih,n:;i�ie:`�u.;<:. h . _
.... ............... . ..
:. . . ....::::::::.:: .
:. ..�;: -::.
�`:It�l:�::::::::;r..` r .�:;�`_:..;. �:�or, n . �><�:.:.:...�-::.:..:..:.5�:::.�._::�:n.::.:.�:A..:::n...�,:..:_:: :.::::.::::...:
::::.:.::...:....:::.:::..�..�:.:.:.�.:.....P�?��..........::....Y....:;.::�::::.:�.;�:::.::�:..::�.�:....:;:::::::.::,.::.�:.�... . . . . .. . . .
Strateqv: 1. Require a permit for landscaping in the County right-of-
. Way . .
Existinq Resolution
(1982 Transporiation Policy P/an)
(1) Resolution 91-214
The Dakota County Engineer is authorized to develop and implement an Adopt-
A-Highway Program fo� Dakota County. The program develop p�ovides group
recognition utilizing County publications and/or press releases. The program
developed allows for installation of the "Adopt-A-Highwa�' recognition sign for
groups requesting the signs, conditional upon their payment of $150.00 per sign
as part of the pertnit p�ocess. (Rewriifen, see O/M.13)
(2) Resolution 91-215
Fee Schedule
Service Area
Fee
Annual Truck Pennit $100 -
53
Single Use Truck PeRnit
Annual Mobile Home Pertnit .. ,
Single Use Mobile Home Permit
House Moving Permit
Driveway Permit
Grading PeRnit -
(Rewrfiten, see O/M.14)
Proposed Policies:
It will be Dakota Counfjrs policy io:
10
100
10
10
50
50
O/M.22 authorize the County Engineer to approve the plaang of parking restrictions.
(Resolution 93-270) � '. ' � -
Q/N!_23 aUthorize the CQunty Enflineer t4 establish, rnaintain, and remove t�mporary
tra�c controls including stop signs, work zone speed limiis� road Gosings and
detour routes, and traffic signals, as necessary to allow progress of authorized
highway projects or emergency situations.
(Resolution 88-426) � ' e ' u - -
�O/M.24 remove private signs placed in Dakota County �oad right-of-way within thirty
feet of the edge of the traveled lanes, beyond thirty feet when requested by
the adjacent landowner, or when the signs obstruct sight, distance or interfere
with tra�c signs and signals. Signs that are removed will be stored at the
highway shop for a reasonable period and retumed to owners requesting the
signs for a$5.00 handling fee per sign. The County Audita� is to give copies
of this sign restriction policy to all persons filing to ru� for office in Dakota
County or for State offices and also to mail copies of this policy to City Clerks
or Administrators and School District Superintendents requesting that they
provide copies of this policy to persons filing for offices at those locations.
(Resolution 90-246) �
�.O%M:25: ���i�
� ... .... . .:::h
ExistinQ Resolutions
(1) Resolution 88-426
54
.�
The County Engineer is authorized ta establish, maintam and remave temparary
tra�c controls to indude:
• Stop Signs
• Work Zone Speed Umits
• Road Closings artd Detour Routes
• Traffic Signals
as r►ecessary ta allow progress of authorized highway construcnon projecis.
{Rewritten, see O/M.23) ,
(2) Resolutian 88-726
The Dakota County Highway D+�partment will enforce the removal of signs
under #he fottowing c:iteria, as time and wor#c crews are avaitabte:
• If #he sign cleady in#erferes wifh main#enance of the highway sysiem. •
e If the sign interferes with, distance or any othe� safety feature. � -
m Wi-�ect ti�� sign becam�s c�isifacting ta �c�}�c�ent proper#y atanecs artd the ..
Highway Department is notified af its existence.
(Replaced by Resolu#ion 2Q-246} .
{3} Resolut'son 90-24fi -�-. .. _ . . . -- . ,N - . �
f
No private signs are io be place in Dakota Caunty right-of-way as per Minnesota
statutes. Ait appropriate parties be na6fied of the County Poiicy. The Dakota
County Policy is: . � . ` ' �
1. The Highway Department is di�ected to actively pursue remaving any private -
signs placed afang Caunfy roads and wifhin the right o#-way that are Kiithin
thirty �eet of the edge of the traveled lanes. �
2. The Nighway Depa�tment is dir�cked ta actively pursue remaving any pnivate
signs in ihe rosd right af way and beyond #hirt}r feet fram the traveied lanes
when the adjacent owner requests the removal.
3. The County Auditor is to give copies of this sign restriction policy to all
persons filing to run #ar affice in Dakota County of for State offiees and also
to mail copies of this policy to City Clerks o� Administrators and School
Qistrict Superin%nden#s requesting tha# they gravide capies of this palicy ta
persons filing for offices at those locations.
4. Signs•that are removed from ifie road right af-way witl be sfored at the
highway shop for a reasanable periQd and tetumed to owrnecs requesting the
signs fo� a$5.00 handting fee per sign.
5. AI! signs-removed and that have not been picked up will be disposed up on
a periodic basis.
55
r_
6. Immediate �emoval will be made when the County becomes aware of signs
that obstruct sight distance or interfere with traffic signs and signals.
(Rewrftten, see O/M.24)
(4) Resolution 91-214 (see pennit section)
The Dakota County Engineer is authorized to devetop and implement an Adopt
A-Highway Program for Dakota County. The program develop provides group
recognition utilizing County publications and/or press releases. The program
developed allows for installation of the "Adopt A-Highwa�' recognition sign for
groups requesting the signs, conditional upon their payment of $150.00 per sign
as part of the peRnit process. ..-
(5) Resolution 93-270 • , _ . . _ , .•,, • �
. � . . .. - .> -
The Dakota County Board of Commissioners delegates authority to the County
Engineer to place "No Parking" signs on County roads in accordance with city
"No Parking" resolutions at locations deemed necessary by the County
Enginee�. . .
(Rewritten, see O/M.22)
.:::,:::.�:ENT:`<><i<>:;:':;::::�::;;`<:::::;`::>::<`�::::>:::<:::':><::>:>`:�:::
:'::,:: ��::�IP1V1 . .
::::.:>:,.:.:�.:>::::.:;:::::.:::;::.::::;.:::::.:::::.;�:.:.::;:: .:::::<::::::.�::..< .:: ::::.:::::<:.<;.:;:�.::....<..,::::-::.;-:<.:�,�:.;�-::.:..:::;:.::-.:::.:..:--..
�JOINT�:PURC�ipiSE';OF�:SERVIC�S��>;fUTATEf2tALS>�::;1dWt� �i�..:.,.,;. .:: :...:::. :::;.::::::::: :.....: ::.::.:_::.::::::..:::::,.::::-
:::>::::-_::.::::.::.;;:.:::.:::.:�:::.�::::.� :::..:. :.:......�.:.:.�:::.-::.::..::::.::::.:,:::.::.::.. :....... .: .... ............................
' . ,iE.. . .
. . . .. _ :.,.... . . ... .
Proposed Policv:
It will be Dakota Count}�s policy to:
Discussion: .
The cities and townships iequested that the County investigate the
posslbi/iiy of joint purchases of senrices, materials, and equipment
County staff felt it was appropriate to enter into joint purchases with the
cities and the townships due to the economies of sca/e which would result
from such purchases. �
Strateqies: 1. Investigate future opportunities for joint snowplowing,
sanding, sweeping, pu�chase of signs, signal
maintenance, striping, and buildings.
2. Develop an implementation plan for joint effo�ts.
Existinq Policies
(No existing policies 8�/or County Boaid Resolutions)
56
Proposed Policies:
!t will be Dakota Couniy's policy to:
U/M.27 post speed limits as estabiished by the Commissianer af the Minnesota
Department.of Transportation (MNDO'n. . .
� ('1982 Trattsportation Plan}
O/M.28 authorize the Coun#y Engineer ta request MNDOT fa perfaRn traffic s#udies io
- determine the reasonable and safe speed iimits on roadways where it is
de#ermined by the Coun#y Engineer that condiftans have suffiaently changed
' fo u�va�nf a study ca�vEfier� Cifix Counai aciian has requested a speed s#cady.
At the time a speed study is feques#ed, fi�e Couniy Engineer shail t�o�sijr the
Cammissianer(s) in whase distri�t{s) the study is being canducted and shall
further notify the Cammi�siane�{s� of the r�su3ts of the MntDQT speed studY-
(Reso�ution 94-�39j
Existinq Poliav and Resolu#ion
(1) Dakata County will conform to the speed zones esiablished by the
Gommissianer of the Mirineso#a Department of Transpartation (MND(Ji�.
(Rewritten, see OlM.2TJ
(2) Resoluiian 9� - 659
The Dakota County Engineer is directed to make requests direcf(y ta MNDQT to
perFomn traffic studies to determine the reasonable and safe speed (imits on
roadways where it is determined by the Couniy Engineer that conditions have
sufficiently changed to warrant a study or wf�en City Cauncii ac�ion has
reques#ed a.speed study. At #he time a speed study is requested, tf�e County
Engineer shaq notify the Commissione�(s) in whose district(s} the study is being
conducted and shali further notify ihe Commissianer(s) of ihe results of #he
MrtlD4T spesd sfudy. '
(Rewri#en, see t)JM.28j
Proposed Palicies:
ST
O/M.29 Dakota County wiil develop the following systems for the continuous
monitoring of County transportation facilities to identify roacfway and
intersecaon improvement needs:
• A traffio counting system that is compat�ble with the MNDOT system
• An acadent data and analysis system that is compatible with MNDOT data.
• A safety improvement rating system that can assist in needs prioritization.
(1982 Transportation Plan) -
O/M.30 Traffic and accident data will be made avaitable on a cooperative basis,
among all levels of govemment fo� all roadways.
(1982 Transportation Plan) . ' � �
Existin� Policies
(1982 Transportation Policy Plan)
(1) Dakota County will develop the following systems for the continuous monitoring
of County transportation facilities to identify roadway and intersection
improvement needs: . . •
• A traffic counting system that is compatible with the Mn/DOT system
• An accident data and analysis system that is compatible with MNDOT data.
+ A safety �moro�emsnt r�tirg system th2t can assist i� nesds prioritiz2tion.
(2) Traffic and accident data will be made available on a cooperative basis, among
all levels of govemment for all roadways.
.,.;C..::.,.;;:lV,>:::,. - .
::>iD�� � I �:<`::'� ���>::�:`:�::;.::::::>�:==:::>�::<:::`:::;:>::>:::�';:;.>::.>:��:�::<.;:_:<«�:�:::';:�;:;<:���::'::�`:t.:;'::::::;_::>=:<::::>::=�::::::';`;;���:��:::>:>:<':��:`?:<::::::::::';: �:
-:;;;:;;;;;:: ::::.. ...:::.:;::-::-;;::.;:::.
: > .: :;: -;:;::; ; :.: : . .. .
:�. . =:>;::><<:::::>:::.>��::
:ROR05 ...: �>�ANpS:...AP ..::..... ..:: :.::::::..::.:. .:.�-::._..:><....::;,,..:�.:�-..::.:.;.._�:..::::,:::::.:::._:.:.:.,.:,.::..::.:::. _:.:::...;..,:: :,.....-.-:.-:: :::::.:>::::::.:::>;:::><;::
Backqround
Staff was directed by the Board to .consider the proposed policy in Resolution 90-
438 in the updated Dakota County Transportation Policy PJan.
Proposed Policies:
It will be Dakota Counf}is policy to:
.::� ::: : .:. :.<.. ::;: . ..�.... .:.:�.: _ ....: . .
::;::,;:::;�::;::;:::::::>purposes; of ::erosign:;
(Resolution 90-438)
(Resolution 90�38)
... ...............
..... ..... ... ..
:OYM:33
58
y�;far�fkie� � ��:;;;.�:<:;:�:
... .... ... .... ...... ....
�:
a
s
Existins� Resolution
(1) Resolution 90-438 -(Proposed policy to be considered for indusfon in the
updated Dakota County Transportation Policy Plan.)
1. Dakota County will plant and maintain vegetation on the County Highway
right-of-way only for the purposes of erosion control and slope and soil
stability. �
2. Dakota County will not advocate or fund hedge and shrub plan6ng on
County Highway right-of-way for aesthetic purposes only. Dakota County
will peRnit hedge and shnab planting on county Highway right-of-way which
will not adve�sely impact safety and the efficient use of the highway.
3. The Co�nty Er�gine�r sha�l regu4ate p;acemen� and se(ecctivn og varie5�s of
hedges and shrubs, taking into account safety clear zones for traffic
movement, sight lines to traffic control devices, sight triangles at •
inxersections and d�veways, prior agreements cegulating right 9f way
obstrucuons, State Aid Standards and other issues pertinent to placement of
non-highway appurte�ances within highway right of way. �'
4. Dakota County will compensate property owners adjacent to County .
highways for hedges and shnabs removed from temporary construction
easements. Property owners may neplace the hedges and shrubs at their
option within the temporary easements.
5. The cost of maintaining hedges and shnabs permitted on the highway right
of-way will be accepted by the city or township in writing prior to permitting
such plantings. The cities and townships will be required to trim the hedges
and shn�bs to protect sight lines for all traffic users to traffic control devices
and other tra�c.
6. T�ees will be permitted only where there is no possibility of a vehicle leaving
the roadway and striking a tree.
7. Pennits for hedge, shrub, and tree replacement in the County right of way
will stipulate that no reimbursement will be made to the City or land owners if
the plantings must be removed by the County for road construction
purposes.
{Rewritten, see O/M.29 & O/M.30)
59
rJ
•:.:.:�� •�: r�.::,..:,; : ......: ......: :�:: :�.. �:: ,.;;,.:::. :.,-: :.; ...: •:: •:: �: -•: �: •: :..:_: •:::.::: .:::: ... .. . ... .
:�:t:�::�::;.
:::r::::�.•:.' �•;i::;:�:;:;:::;�::r::;�:;� .
. ....., . ,-.;: ' •. ' .:»i-: ....
: .... ...: : ...
. . :.;:x:•. .,:r., �:_. .
ROAD�/AY<SURF�iC�<<:»<>:::<::;:::;: ._ :.:,. :..: , . ... . .: -
Proaosed Policies:
lt will be Dakota Count}is policy to:
Strateqies: 1. Minimize the arnount of sand that washes into the stoRn
sewer. �
2. Rotate among the ci6es for the order of sweeping.
3. Work with cities to determine priority areas to Gean first
' (e.g., p�event sand from going into catch basins whe�e
there may be a problem).
O/M.35 conduct roadway surface maintenance except where damage has been
caused by utility woric or other peRnitted operations which would then be -
restored by tne �Q�gons�ble pa!-Ey. � �
(1982 Transportation Pian) �" . ` ` �
Existinq Policv " • - • �
{1982 Tiansportation Policy Plan) � � - � �
(1) Routine maintenance, such as sweeping and patching of County roads, will be
done each yea� sta�ting in late spring.
(Rewriften O/M.32 and O/169.33J '
�
Proposed Policv:
!t will be Dakota Count}�s policy io:
O/M.37 replace mailboxes with a standard size mailbox only when the box was
installed at the proper height and location and whe� actually hit by
snowplowing equipment. The Oakota County Highway Depa�tment will also
replace mailboxes damaged by snow coming off the plow when the mailbox
has been installed on a swing or pivot suppo�t according to the drawing
available nom the Office of the Dakota County Highway Department (see
Appendix �.
(Resolution 91-1011)
• s0
�
w Existin� Resolution
(1) Resolution 91-1011
The Dakota County Board of Commissioners adopts a policy that mailboxes wiil
be �eplaced with a standard size maiibox by the County Highway Department
only when the box was installed at the proper height and location and when
actually hit by snowplowing equipment The Dakota County Highway
Department will also replace mailboxes damaged by snow coming off the plow
when the mailbox has been i�stalled on a swing or pivot support according to
the drawing available from the Office of the Dakota County Highway
Department
(Rewritten, see O/M.35) � �
..::......:..:.:...:::.:...:..:.:>.:.:.....,:.,._...,..:..::.:.........::....... _ _ _- -
� . - --- -
���: -
� _ _
t <;
u -
:��.� �.�?�;?`-:�r;:;°"_`:';..`:::,:.;.;>:::::���.''=>:::.,;::;-">;::<:::;=:�::::::::�:.";`:>:-;=;::�::::,.;;:<':�';,.::_::=:;::<<::':�:::�:'<::'==':?`�:�>;=~:;;��;=`=:::'=;�='<i�»<:<.>:'i.;?>::"��'':.:-:':;:':;:
�l.'5:�3�.._� �..:...::. . •..,:...
Q�op�sed Palacies:
!t wil! be Dakota Count}�s policy to:
Discussion: '
CurrenUy, the Dakota County GIS includes on/y approved plans. When
and if cles�iation occur go the approver! plan during construction, th�se
deviations are not recorded in the GIS sys%rrt. Problems may arise
because the County does not know where things such as utilities are
placed within the right-of-way. � .
Strateqy: 1. Include as-built records in GIS for documentation of the
� final construction. �
... .... ... . ...... ... .. ...... ..... ..... .. ...............
. . ... . . . .. . . .... ... . .. . . . .. .
.
�QI(iA:39..`:record;`::throu9h: .: .1 . ;: a(f :pl�
�...... �i�ght-of=way::>:.::���':>;:�°'��::::>:::;::.;::':::.>.
StrateQy: 9. Include the following:
• highway layer with grade and alignment
• storm sewer layer '
• utility layer
• traffic signal layer �
• building layer
61
.:...:: :.::...,.;: •: •::-:._:•_. .,...�..:,-:.,.,....:::..,.:.:: :..y,•,•:::.:..:;>:.,.;:-::: :::+:•::a:::::.;:;•..:.;:�: :��-.:............... .....................---....................:...�;a;-•;.,:,.;;.::;:+::-:�
;. . , .,: �...._..:..:,:..... :.:..:.:. :.::y. ...`�-..:...:...� ..:..:..: -...::::.. ........� ::.. ...: .:.,-� .:::.....»»;-.:.:: :.....:..:::tc.;x..::.:..;.>:.:..y.,.::.:....:i•::.::.:.:...:....� .:...��^Q:.:.'i::':':j::
:O1M dQ ..�equtre::#ha�::pern)�ttees;�ubmit::as�built�:dr.aw�r�gs;as part +of the �etmit�;p,.,�ss::::<::;
Existins� PolicieslResolutions
(No existing policies 8�/orCountyBoaid Resolutions)
••i:4.•'-':,.''?::}'i:':':::::::-,:�}:i.
BR{D� � '�::.:
G
5�;;::'<:�::::::::>:«:::;:;>::
.. � . . . _ � t _ �. , .
Proposed Policies:
lt will be Dakota Count}is policy to:
.• � ,
O�'M.Q3 cooperat� with t�he tovvnshigs to replace e� re�r�struct de.ficieni structures v�ith
special Minnesota State Transpo�tation Funds, Federai Funds or Township
Bridge Account Funds. (Appendix -) � - • ..._ .. - ' . . '
(Resolution 95-205)
�. _-- , .- , z _ � -.�:• - , ,
Existinq Resolution
(1) Resolution �5-205
The County of Dakota, cooperating with Dakota County Townships, undertakes
to have the following deficient structu�es �eplaced o� �econstructed with special
Minnesota State Transportation Funds, Federal Funds or Township Bridge
Account Funds available for that purpose.
COUNTY BRIDGES
Bridqe No.
L3200
3735
5862
6478
7271
L3165 (RR)
L3181 (RR)
L3197 (RR)
L3208
Location
CSAH 54, 1.3 mi. SE of TH 61 in Hastings
CR 81, 0.1 mi. N of CSAH 66 in Vermillion Township
CASH 47, 0.1 mi. S of CSAH 88 in Sciota Township
CR 8'I, 1.4 mi. N o# CSAH 66 in Vermillion Township
CSAH 91, 2.8 mi. SW of TH 61 in Douglas Township
CSAH 80, 0.6 mi. W of TH 3 in Castle Rock Township
CSAH 86, 0.8 mi. W of TH 3 in Waterford Township
CSAH 45, 0.1 mi. N of TH 13 in Lilydale
CR 94, 0.2 mi. S of CSAH 88 i� Randolph Township
62
r'
�
L`
19503 �. CSAH 47, 0.7 mi. SW of TH 61 in Hastings
19506 CSAH 66, 0.1 mi. W of TH 52 in Vertnitlion Tovmship
.. � , . ,, _ .. _ . _
63
TOWNSHiP BRiDGES
BridQe No. Tovmshin
1392 Hampto�
2374 WaterFar�d
3055 Dauglas
3438A Empire
L3234 Vermillion
L3235 Empire
L3241 Vemtillion
L3242 VeRniliion
L3248 Vermillion
L3253 Gastie Rock
L.3257 (RR� Eureka
L3261 (RR) Castle Rock
L3267 Grieenvate
L3274 Waterford
L3275 Wa#erford
L3276 Casfte Rack
L3278 Casbe Rock
�.3289 . Marshan
L3290 Vermipion
L3928 Hampton
R0311 . Eureka
Na Number Ravenna
No Number Ravenna
No Number Saaia
(Rewritten, see O/M.43)
64
Sec. Na.
i
17
28
28
25
9
14
14
25
11
2i
31
1?
17
20
16
34
14
20
4
9
21
33
22
Location
0.3 rni. N of CSAH 8t1
O.S mi. S of CR 92
0.1 mi. E of TN 20
0.1 mi. N of CSAH 66
1.1 mi. E of CSAH 47
0.5mi.SofCR58
0.2 mi. E of CSAH 85
0.3 mi. E of CSAH 85
2.5 mi. E af GSAH 47
1.0 mi. W of GSAH '79
0.1 mi. E af CSAH. 23
0.7 mi. W of TH 3
2.5 m's. S of CSAH 8f
0.6 mi. S of 3QOth St .
0.1 mi. SE of GSAH 47
0.2 mi. N of CSAH 80
0.7 mi. N af CSAH 86
0.7 mi. N of CR 62
0.'! mi. N nf CSAH 66
0.2 rni. E of CSAH 47 �
0.25 mi. N of 240th St.
0.1 mi. S o€ CSAH fi8
1.5 mi. SE of TH 316
0.9 mi. V1l af CR 59
�
,, .
APPENDICES
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
O.
- APPENDIX 1
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION ITEMS
clearing and gn�bbing items
removal items
grading items
surfacing items
�
base items
surfacing Items
curb and Gutter
medians
shouldering items
�etaining walis
turf establishments .,
pavement markings
signing .
moblizaiion '
sidewalk
�
. . APPENDIX 2
COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIPI PROCESS
1. Distribute approved CIP to aties, townships, and transit providers March
and request changes and/or comments
2. Draft CIP created based upon comments received from cities,
townships� transit providers� and County
3. Draft CIP taken to County Boa�d at AFP meeting July
4. Draft CIP mailed to cities, townships, and transit providers for
comment
5. Final draft CIP created based upon comments �eceived
6. Final draft CIP presented to County Board � Nov.
7. Final draft CIP revised based upon County BQard comments
8. Final draft CIP adopted by County Board
9. Adopted CIP mailed to cities, tovmships, transit providers, and the
appropriate metropolitan and state agencies
1. Distribute approved CIP to cities, townships, and transit providers and requesi
changes and/or comments
. APPENDIX 3
EVALllATiON STEPS FC}R N01SE ABa4TEMENT
9. Determine the cast per residence to ins#all a noise barrier.
$10,OOp-15,OOQ High yes � � • �
$15,000-2Q,a00 Low yes
$2Q,OOQ-30,000 - �ow na �
$30,OQ0 + High No
2. Da residen#s wan# »oise abatement op#ior�. ..
8Q9�o "no' High No
6�% "no" Law No
80% `yes" High Yes
60% "yes' . Law Yes
3. Does the housing predate Minnesota Rules 7030.0030?
Yes - High yes .
No - High no
4. ' Is the future level build at least
65 DBA day
5� GBA nigh#
60 and bei�w high na
65-60 low no
74-65 iaw yes
over 70 high yes
5. Future increase at least 5 DBA.
0-3 high no
45 !ow no
5-10 low yes
grea#er than 10 high yes
6. Futu�e build 5 DBA g�eater than no build?
5-8 low yes
greater than 8 high yes '
45 low no
less than 4 high no
7. Does Cify have in place campatible naise Iand ptanning ardinance and enforce
the o�dinance? �
yes high yes
no high no
,
. APPENDIX 4
RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATiOfV GUIDELINES
Ri�ht-of-Way Dedication Guidelines _
Future Desiqn
2-lane u�an
2-lane naral
41ane undivided
41ane divided
6-lane divided
Discussion:
Total Ri�ht-of-Wav
100 feet
110 feet
� 120 feet
� 150 feet
200 feet
�
. _ ,� .
These guidelines assume compatible land use adjaoent to County �ads. - Non-
compatible land uses may requir� additiona! right-of-way for mitigation.
0
. APPENDIX 5
TURNBACK AGREEMENT REQUIREMENTS
The follo�,�vins� a�e the requirements for tumback astreements:
(a) Township Agreement
1) County 8� Township agree on compensation or woric
necessary before tumback.
2) County will provide description of property.
3) County agrees to maintain for two years after official
tumback resoluaon by the County Board, thereafter all
maintenance and othe� �esponsibilities are tfie Townships.
4) Township agrees to hold County harmless and understands
� that the County has met all obligations for this road. •
(b) City Agreement .
1) County &� City agree on compensation orworlc necessary
before tu�back. .
2) County wil( provide description of property.
• 3) City will be totally responsible for the roadway following the
tumback resolution by the County Boarcl.
4) City agrees to hold County harmless and understands that
the County has met all obligations for this road. "
0
DAKOTA �4UNTY ACCESS � �PACING GUIDELINES
TYPE OF ACCESS TYPE OF COUNTY HIGHINAY AFFECTED BY. ACCESS �2)
BE1NG REQU ESTEQ PRINCIPAL DIVID�O UNDIVIDED 2 or 4—LANE
ARTERIAL 4 or 6—LANE > 15 000 AD7 1 < 15 000 ADT 1 <3 000 ADT 1
A. Privaie Residential or Not Permilted No! Permitted Nol Permitted 1/8 mile spacing Determination
Individual Gommercial �Full Access} based on other
"criteria �
B. Multiple Commercial (Full Access) Not Permitted 1�4 mile spacing ` 1/4 mile spacing 1/8 mile spacing peterminatian
based an other
criteria
C. Pub(ic Street — 1J4 mlle spacing 1/4 mile spacing Not Applicabls Not Appl(cabie Not Applicable
Multlple Commerclal (3j, (4} (3}, (4} -
Right Tums & �.eft in On(y � '
D, Public Streel — 1/8 mile spacing 1(8 miis spacing Nai Permitted Not Appl(cable Noi Applicable
Muitipis Cammercial (3} (3} �
Right Turns Only �
E, Public Street 1�2 mfle spacfng 1/4 mile spacing 1/4 mile spacing 1�8 mfle spacing 1/8 mile spacing
(3� ' {3�
F. Principal Arterial and Expressway Grade 8eparated 1 mlle spacing 1 mlfe spacing 1 mile spacing t mile spacing
lnterchange
NOTES:
(i) A11 traffic valumes refer to 20—year forecasts.
(2) Roadway types tefer to anticipated cross seotion.
(3) Aequires insiallaiion of turn lanes, ��.
(4� Requires wide median and addltlonal rlght—af—way.
�,�
.
— D ra�t — -
31— q c ", t,
p.itorma�r ,a
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�� �
September 13, 1996
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Kevin Batchelder, City Admi.nistrator
Subject: Authorization to Renew Police Liaison Contract
DISCUSSION
An item that was included in the preliminary 1997 Budget was the Police Liaison
Officer in the amount of $6,240. This would represent the second year of the contract which
includes the City of West St.Pa�al, the City of Pagan, the City of Mendota. Heights and
Independent School District 197.
The original contract was for a one year period and must be renewed if tlus program is
to continue for 1996/1997 school year. West St. Paul is requesting our participation and has
forwarded another one year contract for our consideration.
In discussions with West St. Paul, they have indicated that they would like the term of
the contract to be longer than one year for fiscal planning purposes due to the overlap of the
school year in the Cities budget cycles. However, the City of Eagan desired another one year
contract and this is what is being proposed at this time.
ACTION REQUIltFD
If the City Council so desires, they should pass a motion approving the Police Liaison
Services Agreement: 5chaol District 197 and the Cities of Eagan, Mendota Heights and West
St. Paul and authorizing the Mayor to execute the document.
�.ys�,r� '""
September 12, 1996
Kevin Batchelder
Administrator
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Kevin:
1
CITY OF WEST ST. PAUL
1616 HUMBOLDT AVE., WEST ST. PAUL, MN 55118-3972
ADMINISTRATION 552-4100
POLICE 552-4200
FIRE 552-4239
TDD# 552-4222
EMERGENCY911 � "�'f"'`,
� �_
t� �
�P�� 1 � ig.�; 3�� �
------ ���"�°"� ' � �
� '�e'd'�.R.d�CIC,�fln�d
At the September Dakota County Managers meeting, I provided a copy of the police
liaison services agreement for your review. Please let me know when you are
prepared to sign the original and I will forward it to you.
When all the appropriate signatures have been obtained, we will return a copy of the
signed agreement to you.
ours truly,
���
Dianne R. Krogh
City Manager-Acting
DRK:parc
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
f: �' �
r`l i
POLICE LIAISON SERVICES AGREEMENT:
SCHOOL DISTRICT #197 AND THE CITIES OF EAGAN, MENDOTA
HEIGHTS AND WEST ST. PAUL
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into the day and year set forth below by and
between the CITY OF WEST ST. PAUL, a Minnesota municipal corporation,
[hereinafter "the Cit�r"] and SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 197 AND THE CITIES OF
EAGAN, MENDOTA HEIGHTS all Minnesota municipal corporations.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, for purposes of this Agreement, the School District's participating
secondary schools within the Cities consist of the following schools: Frances M. Grass
Junior High, and Henry Sibley High School. -
WHEREAS, the parties enter into this AGREEMENT pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
§275.125, Sub�+. 6j.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. The City agrees to provide a full time licensed (Police Officer Standards &
Training) peace officer to perform an average of 40 hours per week police liaison
services during the school year to the School District's secondary schools for the
purposes of assisting in the establishment and trained coordination of a cooperative
community approach among the Schoof District's schools, students, parents, police and
other community resources to address the needs of the students and community
members. The City's police liaison services shall include, but not limited to:
a. Prevention of delinquency;
b. Protection of life and property; and
c. Law enforcement.
2. The City of West St. Paul shall be paid the amounts as indicated, School District
No. 197 shall pay the amount of $20,8fi1.00, the City of Mendota Heights shall pay
$6,237.00 and the City of Eagan shall pay $4,068.00, as and for the City's police
liaison services to the School District.
3. The parties agree and acknowledge that the police officers who are assigned to
provide police liaison services in the schools are, and will continue to be, members and
employees of the City and its police department. The officers shall operate under the
direct administration and supervision of the West St. Paul Police Department but will
work in cooperation with school administrators and involved police departments to
further mutually agreed goals involving the police departments, schools and students.
The o�cers shall not have disciplinary responsibility or authority within the schools
beyond their authority as police.
�,,"' =-.'�
4. Ai( payments due shail be in fwo equai payments. The amaunt to be paid
by the School District, the Ci#y of Eagan, and the City af Mendota Heights as
specified in paragraph 2 herein shail be payabie in two equal instaliments due on
November 15, 19� and January 3, 1997.
5. This Agreement is effective for the 9 996-1997 schoo! year, upon the expiration
af the 1996-1997 school year, this Agreement sha11 autamatically #erminate.
This Agreement da#ed this day of , 1996.
SCHOOL DISTRICT N0. 197:
CITY OF WEST ST. PAUL:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS:
CITY OF EAGAN:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
t� �
September 13, 1996
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Kevin Batchelder, Ci A�� tor
ry
5ubject: Authorization to Retain Services of Structural Engineer
At the September 3, 1996 meeting, the City Council directed staff to contact Mr.
Geoffrey 7illson, structural engineer, to retain his services for the review of an application by
Mr. Paul Beckman for a height variance to allow a ham radio tower. Mr. Jillson is available
to conduct the review requested by City Council and city staff is preparing Mr. Beckman's
materials for review by Mr. Jillson.
Mr. Jillson has submitted his pmposal for a contract, that is the standard proposal for
his fum. (Please see attached.) This contract has been placed upon your agenda. for formal
authorization to enter the contract and for Council to determine a cap, or limit, for
expenditures for Mr. 7ilLson's services. As of the time this memo was drafted, staff has been
unable to discuss an estimated amount with Mr. Jillson for his services. This estimate will be
available T�esday evening.
Mr. Jillson has proposed that his services could be streamlined by having staff work
with Mr. Beckman to prepare all the appropriate materials for lus review. This is being
handled by city staff and we don't anticipate a lengthy review process by Mr. Jillson. Mr.
Beckman has stated that he will cooperate in any way that he can.
ACTION RFAUIRED
If the City Council so desires, they should pass a motion to authorize staff to retai.n Mr.
Jillson's services as a structural engineer to review Planning Case No. 96-27, for aa amount
not to exceed $ 2� 00 O(estimate to be provided 1�esday evening).
GG �ti66C�
09/12/96 10:09 F.� 612 933 3�36
� � �
ENGIIVEERING
CORP�RA710N
1002 Mainstreet
Hopkins, MN 55343
612'-933-6161
Winthrop & Weirtstine
3200 Minnesota Worid Trade Center
30 East Seventh Street
St. Pavf, Minnesota 55101
Attn: Thomas Hart IV
Re: Paul 6eckman Mendota Tower
GUY ENGINEERING -+-►-+ bfENDOT� HEIGHTS � �02 �
MECHANICA L
STRLJCTURAL
GEOTECHNiCAL
MACHINES
FORENSIC
Septernber 11, 1996
SENT V(A FAX AND US MA1L
Pursuant to your telephone cali this day regarding the above referenced matter, below please find
our letter of retainer, terms, conditions and cuRent fee schedute, (2 pages attached?.
Upon receipt of your autho�ization, we wilf ente� into detailed discussions on the above matter
and wiil investigate and consvtt with you and report our findings. Also, if appropriate we wil!
testify as expert witness in connection with the same. Our services to yau wiit be initiated upon •
receipt of the countersigned authorization.
The fees for the above services wil[ be bilfed at aur regular rates in effect at the time services are
provided. Present rates are �9,'120.00 for each day (or any part of a day} for couct or standby for
covrt. Depositions {EST`S) are considered as court time. Any services mandated by other parties
ta this ac�ion shall be paid by t[�e ctient above. Consu(tations and studies or reports required are
presently biiled at S95 pe� hour for the undersigned. Technical or cEerica( staff, if required, wil! be
bilIed at current rat2s. Costs of coflection (if any}, including fees for our time and Iegal fees, wil!
be added to biflings.
Biifings will be rendered monthly or at appropriate times during the progress of the case. Payment
is anticipated within twenty (20) days of the bill date_ A charge of 2°� per month or fraction
thereafter shali be appiied to any outstanding amocrnt as liquidated damages_
It is understood that our services are as an independent professional cansu(tant, and that payment
for same shali be made promptiy and is not contingent upon the results of any tegal action, ar-
bitration, settlement, or collection.
Please sign and return tt�is agreement. Upon receipt of same we will make a written validation to
you af the agreement Pending such, the use of aur name is prohibited and we reserve the right
to aCCept assignment by others in [ieu of your fcrm_
Geoffrey G. Jiltsors, PE, Principa[
PRQP4SED I�IGREEMENT ACCEP'tED:
By: �tle- Date:
AGREEMENT CONFIRMED:
By: Geoffrey G. Ji(Ison, P.E. Date: _
,
� � 09/12/96 10:10 F.�S 612 933 3�36
�-UY
ENGlNEEFifNG
• COAPORATION
't 002 Mainstreet
Hop[cins, MN 55343
6'f 2-933-6'� 64 •
� SCtiEOULE AND CONDITiOt�[S 7996
PROFFSSIOI�tAt SERVICES:
GUY ENGINEERING -►-►-+ MENDOT� HEIGHTS [�j OOa
�
PrinciQai EngineeNCflnsv(ting 595.04 /hr
Staff Technician or Feid Engineer $67.50 /hr
Administrative/Report Proc2ss S37_50 /iv
Reta�rter, Minimum Paymerrc as quoted
Principal 6�gineerl%stimo�y �t44.00 fir isee conditivn 12)
Prineipal Enginee�lt'est�mcny Fedewl Court S250.00 /hr
DCPERiSES:
Photographic {1 roli x Z copiesl S45_00 at time of initiat devefopment
Phatagraphic duplicates; S5.OQ per photograph for 10 ar fewer frames;
S200 per photopraph for 11 or more frames .
Y.C.R. tapes, 575.00 per iape, additicna! coD�es �55.00/ea
Phota en[argemertts by specia) request; Uvr cosi ptc�,s 259G.
Auto MEeage $0.55lmi
Evide�ce ha�dGng {minimvm #ee) 525.00
Evidertce Storage; minimum S25_00 pe� mortth
Other_ travet, long distance ca1(s, exFubit, maieriats, shipping,
Subconvacted services, tab fees etc. Our cost + 25�
CONDITIONS:
t.
2.
MECHANICA L
STRUCTURAL
GEOTECHNICAL
MACHlNES
FORENSIC
All time is meascned poRa[ to poRal. Travel time outside of the Twin Cities Metro area may Be biited at a reduced
travet rat�
Retainer, minimvm payr�'tent, vsnit be credited against Finai Invoice_
3. Unfess otherv++ise agreed to in writing, the 'clienY is ihe persan to whom the cover letter is addressed afong with
their employer if it is included as part of the ci�ent's address. The individual c(ient warrants his or her authority to
bind the principaF, lf one or more other parties a�e to be responsibte, each must sign a copy of the caver fetter
and each attachment pa9e and return them to the Guy Engineering Corporat�on office_ tn the event responsibili�+
for the project changes hands, or in the eveni of a change of personnel, no errtiry is relieved af the respansibi(ity
withovt the written approval of Guy Engineering Corporatian.
Q, 1n the event the individual addressee is employed by a public agency and ihat agency is ta be responsible, the in-
dividuat addressee �warrarits his nr her authoriry to bind Lhe public agency uNess otherwise stated In writing or utt-
Iess the agreemerit is exeecrted by the appropriate autharity.
5. The dient is �esponsy"b[e for paytng alt fees and expenses oi Guy Engineering Ca�poratior� refated to the engage-
ment This shalt include activities in response to discovery effarts by other paRies. As a courtesy, if the client
wishes, Guy Et�ineetinp Corporation may bill apposinp Parties far the time and expenses involved in respondinfl
to disco�ery. Credt wilf be given for payments received pursuani to this billinp. Guy EnQineering Corporation
may termir�ate services immediatefy and without notice in the event of unpaid invoices or overdue payments_
6.
7.
8.
9_
Trips requiring overnighF stays will he bi[fed for time spent on the project between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m_, ar
sach greatec time as is actualTy worked and/or tra�eied. '
Guy Engineering Corporation resenres the cipht to blI (ost or wasted tirrie in the event of a cancellation, wheit+er
the cancellation is caused by the ctient or the apposing side.
Fees and expenses may be billed monihiy ar as t�m� and expenses acarue, uniess other arrangements are made
with Guy Engineering Corporation_
Rates are su6jecr to change on a caiendar year tsasis without other notice.
09/12/96 10:10 F.� 612 933 a�36 GtR' ENGINEERING
CsUY ENGINEERING CORPORATiON
FEE SCHEDUtF, 7'ERMS A11tD C�ND1T10NS 1996
-.�-► MEEIVDOTa $EIGHTS l�j �� `"�`
Page 2 of 2
i8. Paymerrt is due from the client wirhin thiriy {30) days of the invoice, tmless different arrangements are made with
Gcry Engineering Corporatian. Guy Engineering Corporation wll charge a late fee of 2% per month as Iiqu�dated
damages, $10_00 minimum, on all icrvoices not paid within thirty (30} days of receipt by the cGenL The cliert
shafi pay any and ali cotlection costs, including costs for tim� incurred by enginee�s off,ce, any and alt tegal fees
and castc, plus apDellatefees incurred by GW Engineering Corporation in cannection with �ollection of ics ac-
eaunL Any co[iectian or other proceedings shall be pursuant ta Minnesota Law and the venue of Hennepin
Cotmty.
1i.
12.
Unless expressty agreed by Guy Engineering Corparation in w�iting, any cost escimates for services srated are for
ihe ctient�'s bud9etir�g purposes only and are not quotes which are binding on Guy Engineering Ccrporation.
The minunum tPst�mony fees are eight (81 hotus for each day or iraction of a day du�ing v+rhich testjmvny is given.
The minimum fees for cancel[ation of scheduted testimor�y are: •
Sbc {6) ha�rs for Iess than twa {2} daYs' notice_
Four {4} hours for [ess thar� focu (41 days' natioe.
?wo (2j t�ws for less than•seven {7y days' notice.
A minimctm payment of S1,120.00 shalt be Daid prior to start of deposition. Deposiuons sha(1 not exceed 8 houcs
cfock time which sha11 include 46 minutes for lunch and two 15 minute breaks and breaks for restrooms. Shauld
it be necessary to continue beyond 8 hours time inctuding travel, the deposition shall he continued on another day
which is convenient ta the schedule of the witness and other parties. Additionat tesiimony shatt be billed in 8
hflur day blocks prepaid as per the above. �
Mir�imum prepaid fee for testimorry in Federal Court or depositions associated with matters in Federai Court shalt
be �2000.00.
t3_ In ihe eventthat any employee, former emplayee, ContraCt Dersonnel, otctside Consultant or associate is sub-
paenaed for any reason or by arsy party, the cliecrt agrees ta pay the full daily rate of the prtnc�Dat of ttiis frm to
Guy Engineering Corporaton in addition to any fees paid to the person subpoenaed. A futl copy of the deposition
or testimany transcripts shalt be pravided immediatety to �uy Engineering Corporation. Terms of payment shall
be as per ihe above.
14. Photogcaphic negatives, V.C.R. tapes, computer software, drawings, notes, reports and other documents preDared
by Guy Engineering Corporation a2 instcuments of service and sha[l, unless fltherwise agreed, rema�n zhe property
of Guy Engineering Gorporation. Phctagraphs and videotapes are caDY�9�ed work product af Guy Engineering
Corporation. No duDlication is permitted withaut prior written eonsent of Guy Engineering Corporatio�
15. The clierrt agrees that the engineer's name and identity, and the r�ame and iderrtiiy of his employer Guy Engineer-
ing Corpo2t�on, may not be used in oonnection with this or ariy other projec� matter oc case in nego�iation or '
eiherwise, v+rrthout paYment ef �uy Fngineering Corporation's minimum fees. Minimum fee 5500 or 2s otherwise
agreed upon in writing.
i 6. These terms and canditions, induding tiie farm of the fee schedule, were derived frem forms copyrighted by the
National ACademy of Forensic Engineers. The Academy reserves a11 rigtrts to its CopyriBhted forms, except thai
me�nhers in gaod standing are avtomatipl(y Iicensed by the Acader,zy to use its forms in part o� in whole provided
this paragraph is�reprinted in its ernirety therein.
FiELEASE HOLD HARMLESS A�ID INDEN[N[FICATIdN AGREEMENT;
The clierrt or si9natory of the retainer agreement or requester of services ar receive� of senrices and any ozher person,
fum or wrporation i�aving an ownership or management interest in said firm. �eir heirs, clients, executars and assigns
hereby agree to retease and hcld harmless GW Ensineering Corporation (Engineer) and any and all personnet asso�iated
with o� empteyed by said firm includir►g any and atl heirs, assigns, or suecessors from any and alt cfaims and demands afi
arry Idnd inc[uding all claims and demands for personat �injury, property damage and death, whether said injuries 6e
iaiown or unknown, inc[uding the knowrt and unia'►own consequences ef said i�jury whici� may be serffered or sustai�ed
in cannection witii ar assoaated with satd services or relauoriship.
Md, ira cortisideration of teceiving enginee�ing servIces, the Signatory agtees to hoid h3rmless, protecT and indemnify the
engineer, frorc� a!I claims of distress, and ar damages, wheti�er icnown, unknown, whether caused ar related to the
e�g'�neeririg services, inciuding attorrreys fees, consequential damages, injury or any type of (oss, including loss af use.
aw3rd, re�enue and �osts of repairs or reptacement of ac�y s�trc�ctures, sYstems, and/or equlpment. The client agrees
that ar�y claims against the engineer shall nflt exceed the amount ot the fee for services. The signatory agrees to
pramptty pay for ser++ices rendered as per the terms stated above. Signatory agrees io Day all f�es including attorney's
fees ac�d engineers time blled at current rates which may be incurred associated with cotlection of fees_
�
LIST OF CIGARETTE LICENSES TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
SuperAmerica Group
S�Pt�mher 12, 1996
3.2 MALT LIQUOR LICENSE (ON-SALE)
TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
17,1996
SuperAmerica Group
`
LIST OF CONTR.ACTORS TO BL APPROVED BY CITY COIINCIL
- . -_�i . -
Concrete/D2?sonrv Contractor License
Leibel Construction, Inc
Joseph Construction of St. Paul, Inc
Excavatiag Coatractor License
Gopher State Concrete, Inc
Outdoor Design
Gas Pi�ing Contractor
AVAC Contractor
A-abc Appliance & Heating, Inc
Anderson Air, Inc
General Contractor License
ECI Building Contractors
Lloyds Construction Services, Inc
Western Cedar Supply
se
JBL Plastering, Inc
_.._ .. - . -.:-
Siga Contractor
Lawrence Sign
r1w:.ti: :i,1rd:<.j..�'.,� �7t4�t�'';Mi;i.:7:c�::lt:i::�17. .�jr;i^r,:.�%i�f�l.:�'jY�\j�.^.lv\�.'P.•f�.� .•.(iti: �tiAi�Yt•?.>\i:��.'�:"
- - - .;'r. „r•.. ' �' .L;i'.�•:':^'t...: •
• ' • . . �- . .. . • ' ; ' . , • . .. - �; �� , . ... . . . . �
., �'''_""'!''r_.� '�'�='� �� r:�"���r '_ ;�.�u-�.h.'Y?a%�; ':�1a.i�'%:t�*ox`�ic`�;?;�*��:�`�c�?'��.`;a�
_ . .' �' . _ � :! . . . .
, �� . .. •.: •:t " • ' ' • � ..... ' � e .. .. .•
: ,. ;��a?..... =t•' . , ' . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . _. . •.
..._. _ . . . . . . ... ! ,
. . i
' - —�-- -- - -
{ • `.
September 17, 1996
1�D: Magar and C3tg Covnctl
' CLAL�LS LZ'ST SOMHARY:
Total.CZatms
Significant CZaims
Professional Turf
• Tracy Tripp
tlausaaZ Claims
Brown& Chris
Dell Marketing
Kober Exc •
Valley Paving
' �': f: ` . ..
fertilizer
gas �
water main
GIS eq
Improvements
Curley streets
134,083
3,051
4,794
63,298
4,413
9,980
27,271
.. , . ; . . . . �e . . �i: '.: _ ,'iz; •.Y.. .. . - .
�
'3 Sep 19p�
F�i 20:r 1
Temp Checrc Number
i
9/13/96 Claims List
City af Me»dota Neic
+ lVame � „ . - f Rccaunt Gade
uept lU-Aam Dept 50-Roads Raoe i �
15-Engr 6o-Utiiities ,
2U-Police 70-Parks
30-Fire 80-Planning �� .
40-CEO 85-Recycl�i r�g �
.....___�._..,—�__.._._.__---90WAnima�--�ontroi_ _,—._�..--- _____....:.
. . ;2 i
L_Gommer�ts__..._.__....__.—.---�.___,_�_ Rmount ._.------------_,_._..�_. �° Ik
8 84 i � E
i Rir Tauch Gelluiar �vi-w�x�-�i��j+� aug svc
1 Air Touch Cellul�r. 05-4210-1@5-15 aug svc 5.06 8
r �x� <,. lr.;;.- auc e u ar � . - �- • au8 svc , . f5�9 , �o
�`;:;;,��i"�Ai:r`t7'aacls Ce22nlar , 01-4�C-10=030-30 � a, . aug sve ` • 7.58 - ,za
� �;
;•x>�. r'v*e" . , Y-� ' ;
r �,�,� _ 'h`� �, f .,.�.�,r ,, . ., . .. , �. �__�._
�. < �:-'" :'•, � __ _____., �.�. � -
=: 23T: 27 �"""'"_ _
'icttals Terop Check Number , 1 ' `�
.;s�
� emp ,C ec Number 2 _ —�.—�.—__.�.--.w_....._._._._.___..__�___..__.�___.�.�._.._.,F�..�....._....-------------.. ___...__.—.^...___,_.... i7�
t'�'* �"° ��.g �:•:����, . , , ', . . . , . . `�` •
�k». `�;,..,r^sr�-..: ' ;in�` �
;x;��;�2s-Air�Ctincition3ng Assoa�Inc 01-4335=315�30_�__.,_._e___._..�. rQrs__.---.�__.__.._..�__....__.__..�____..�..2��_�7__._ �^:
� � ' 809. 17 ..__�__.__...-----_r_ ', /
Totals 7emp Check Number � �-��
.�::.N��.y�„ .:.N � ,.. . --___•_•_ • — • ---�----• --- _._._._.��._...r.w__ _—_ —___ _... _ e.�.�..�.2=i
'^{' J,.yv. .. :q'3 . �.� � �U'
Temp;'�heck Numtrer 3 ' ; s
�,, , . < .
'..:.�::.�.m~ .. _ ., . � -
----_.____,..__._..._�__ ._.._... _ -• -. - - __..._.___.. H
�ncy auer ?is�- t�§�t �.'��=i�S.__�.___._._..__----..._ ___ _,.__ _exp reiirib__._�_.._---..___..__..�..__�_._..... I2: 20 --�. _ :,,
3 Nancy Bauer ' 01-4415-640-12 exp reimb election 25.2iIl y;�
3 Nancy Bauer _�__ _��_�___ 01-4490-640-i2 exp reimb election 45.86 _.:
Fi�"m'e..,R�;�:r.�z!A.'� .,P.�, •'.;.y ` � "'�.. .�.._....._..»....�..,._,_...,_.�.._..w._"_._..� -_....___...._ «.__...� .." '8G^. �4G..._�. �. .__...'__' '__...__.._, '"" .Sa
�r :;�;�. Satals TernP Check Number
Temp Ch�ek NumSer
-� <; ' : � .' e ar�ao�g __.. �.•-
°���6s ,,�� :.
�;
Ta a s emn Check Number
Temp Check IVumber
Ay'd�tx\"` r.7.�+� °•�^F:.� � w « ,. . . . . __.
�"� '� •�«r't:�$�l�@Y.`, $ti$ i� .... .
' �>;�s i^$4'fi;"•^`,y:.. .
`��,�yTctals 7emp Check Number
. �mp_� eckt$ umber , . �
� s?z,�`�` ' �i '�; "�� xrk >• -^• ;. "
, . ��• � , .
�_ ,
&��-�,��� i�; .�.. _ p. a;: ..� �.
,,�., �,�=;�'a�;K.evin.8atch�lder
_.._.._. 3 r^ __...__. .__.____._.__,__-•---_ ._...---.... ._ _.._.. __._� _.._...__..._ ... _....�.__. ....___ ._...___,.__ .. --.•---_._ _.. _ _ �__.. .._...._ .._______ ... • -
:�
k l;,; ,_•�
�.
___...__ 0��'►�335=�T5=��... __--.___._. ._-•..--�---rQy;,s •-----._.....,. ._.__...___..__ __._.`_......rr..135�0@-._.-- •-•----.—___ ._..__.._..:,..
• �_ 135. 00
0
td1-4330-4bkI-30
@1-4220-08@-80��,
. r<.
,�'
. �
___.______._......._._._ ___.___.____.._....______..___.___�. �_____._... .__._�_._._...
....... _�.�,..��.�_...�_,_—ep•
parts 138. 69 " j_°�, -�
------ '_ � �
___ ___._______.�.----------•----- '''
_—.___.._....i38.-6�._..__ ._..�. .....__..�.. __.
� 6
Tata].s Temp Check Number 6
?xe?"�«����h^ �..rY°:��.�`4'bbP�C"'F''z<a��: .� t � : .. �2 ... � lk..'� „"'F'..'• •,. � � .�9 , , �, .
���P. �►,�k;� Numti�r ., :..•�� �;,�<K; 7.�� . ; � a �v�. + I x ;�i's°; ,� �� � . W�" . { . . . ".
£l 4 , : ,�:..,.
>�G.�� ': �i a��z ?, . �. :'�` �<�.�'a �:.
.-x<.._�z,�*7"A,"€.�z.�.�a �x�'��,�d�`g:a=;."i,<,�,��ry:$.� �•;�-Y."' ,:�.: ',t;,p;�>,�,"��, ��i��:��� .n .
7
re afr noise mitig�tion
40. 94
�Q+. 94
583. 1 �
i
ea �; ��-.��,Tota�°s �Temp � Check Numtrer w . • - 7 � .��t-;:> �: � � _. (,�
ae����< ,� . � �, 3 , _ ��
�Ts°�z'3� b.tixt �'„^�° .,�"`"z.«.5, .� tF,.,."��;F��'NyS�;*;a'-` , r�s-• , �'�r . , R. 7e
ia ac� �aya
� Fri 10:� 'i
. femp Chec� Number
�laxrns List
City of Mendota Heig�
�.,;..�.F.....z ' .
;t�iumberd=,Venclor 1Ueme � Acrount Code ��_ � T�` Comments
8 Bnland Bros 01-4335-315-30 aug svc
;;s;��,�".ztii� ;'xx'Y"•:••,..;t,ii'.::.y , ,... .� � , � .
��{x�Tota�1�.�Temp Check Number 8 r �
uY�='w:'?`T'?'- '
emp ec um er -"—"""'-'
9 Browrs & Chris Ina --•_.- E?-4460-718-0tB ---. ._. __.a_
?�h:,�=��rg'3 P,, � ;� , .
.�,kp..S,.:ii .}:�? � '. _ , "r
��L�7ota�ss:l'emp.� Ctseck 'Number 9 .__._...._�_
pyrnt 2 went _cvtr main
Page 2
Amount
244. 95
b3� �"38. 55 --
63, 298. 55
E I
IQ l
;:o {..
�i r �
t�. "
��
{,. !
jrs�
,.�
."I':tt.
Temp Check Number 10 ���?
�«i
���a;s- � ys.ness � ecor s orp � =�►300=6"+�=i�------•,"�v.."`"---- rpt^s . ___.50.-00--- .. ,z3
� t'�� �i+�•C�y� 40'3:: • . �. , . .�����
',�Y%,'�, {� `ry�.' i2Gl:
�� �,.jV�• • • a • �JYJi CfYi �'
":ra•`.� . .
' ' "' ' � � _�_.�...�.. _�« ....,..�_..._._... ��'�."�` "'. .� ...� ��� �...�" ��.. _ �..�.._���.. �.�.� �.....���... �..�.. �.Y .��....... � _
a a s emp eck um'6er ��D __...._._ _..___...__._..__.._.__.---...____-.-•- --
Temp Check r:umber il �~'
�>a�"z'q�";,�;:,�«::..�.- ; , ._._ — -_-_--___.__�..._._.___. -----_�_.......�.__,.____.....__._��.._ ._----- �---- _._�_._..._.____._..._� -=„
G;�,`��.?�i1,�.Carlson Autamatic Fire Prot 08-4335-000-W0 rprs 646.73 �ti �
�`�`:<��`�.."_ .i.y. _•—___
:�""'.. �,., . . _�._. _..._. __.�.__..�......___._..._.__._._.. ____,._�...�...._._�_ ___ .__--.--_____.._..._6�+5:73___r...__. ___�__....___�`_'
7otals Temp Check Number 11 `��
�:,�, -.
4�„:e;;r
^ £'i�it Utft 1^ �_..._ ---#'�. ...r_ ._ ,. _..� _.___.–'–._..».._._ �....–'�--. ». . __ _.._._.� _...... .__. _..--' .�–.�'– `--- �nc•
f..a. . � `•____.....e_.___.. _._,.._�.....�_.__.. . _�_..».e�..y_ •�}�
��+;�x!."�.}, � �' . ' , .
;t,'.:.��..12 Carque�t 0�1-4330-49@-50 parts 28.49 • °'
arqae� -�.._ _�ii'=�►33�Di=4z3@`50 ---____�.,�.....__�._. _ �ar'�'s -..__. ....____ �+0: 38�_......___� �.` �
12 Carquest 01-4330-490-50 parts 2.85 ���
3b..<:q, :, . . * . ,
�tals i'empr Check �tumber
my.�;x:, :g �P:� :.., .
r J:��...�)r;`;,:,:•� ;•r..,.. ». ,
.�iec c�l�um r
13 City :nator Supply
a y. o or upP Y
'_:_�}:;•,�.�- � ,.�,a,A:-�: .
2, -��:, '�_�, ,.x .
faz;�.:;��,�` -.,.F�A ;.:.
o a s emp ec um r
—__.—_._�___T__�.__---__. .�._____.___,._.��_..._..-.-•-e� ,_:_.... _... .z�
- --- '"?#:72�-------- �.�,
12 , , •- '
.. • �
�-
, . �: �!': .
----_ ' ..-i
01-4330-440-2@
�Z =433QC-"zt�30=50
p Check Number 14
�•r';:'�.�'�^.�,;g.�s},"��;ar�;;, r-:�: •.>;� „�, o . s� � ,. � ., .. � .. . ,, ,;. ._ .
:����s14�Co»�o`3iifat�d�E2ectric Co 15-4330-490-60
�,��.;�:a;�,��.�:�'e`�:�x.�tA.���;".;�� . 'r. ,rw� ;y ..
Total� Temp Check Nucnber 14
p: .. ec } um rAe> ,:::..�,�, .... . _ . :a: � r . 4
k .#4�y ,����'R "P' �fi�e"�Sr'- ;:,i.4. , a .
�Y�-,Tu'��:�9�v�s._•`��,'��!L�?; 'y." i"_tiiz. .. ,,:;. �Y" .i,%'., ,
°��15%CoVeral.I• ����;�y'�;�:� ,. � •.�< ,.. . � ,. 0l,-4335-31@-5fl .
'parts
�___._—_..__#���_' "
' � rpr� ls
.. .. . .�.` > :. „ . ..
110. 6'S
175� I-'7
28B.88
80..30 ,
. . . ...�'.. , ,. • .x .
aug svc, �`�,;�'�", .�:•,. , . ' • 60.00.• R ` < .
�.r.
, 13 Sep IQa6
Fri 10;' `7
'� Temp ChecK Number
i5
;-s�.�7.emp:•,�.� �:-..: .
,� . ,:: . ,.
z �GtieciC"'�x ,� ':N; •. .
� �'�Nuinb�'r�Vendor ..Mame
4
a 15 Coveral3
. IS Covera2l
� ;�;w �;� �� - o.vera • �
• 3r�"&��iS�=Gover` n11 .
' o i:?�� ,�;a� i5' Coverail2 '
�o vera
t� —
�a 105
+� �,nr� Y; o a„s>. emp .Check ur�ber
�4,��''�`y;'�r^:;T��:�t:,�,•h;`K,, .
+a z���7epip'Gtieelt"AiWnbei^ 16
�
�
J
16 Dell Marketing
i6 De32 Marketing
�-�s;,a: ry e R arke ng .
�°'"; `�.16"-1)el l ' Market ing
54
7otals Temp Check Nwnber
emp,,, ec =� um er ------i7
;�'>:'�i�.�i'�;»�+� �;y,c;•�,t.
��'.:z17.Diesei Caropone»ts Inc
17
Totals Temp Gheck NuMber
�mp"'Chec{i'.1Vumber 16
=i. 'J'i:' \a:y..,,��.
.�..c i�Rir a nian
18 Electra Watchman
Gtieck Nuwatter
19 Facili
Temp Chec3c Number
C2aims �ist Page 3 '
City of Mendota Heir
Account Code ' Cemments ,Amount ��
01-4335-310-7tD _..____..M______..._..--_.___aug svc._.___..._---�___---_______....-.-_..._6@.00 _�.___---..._____.�_�___- `�?
f5-4335-3i0-60 aug svc 59.99 �'�
�' -i�►33a=3I5=30 —.._._.___._. �e�svc . 7�9 . '��
02-4335-310-50 seQb sva '. 50.0� !,�
01-4335-320-70 sept svc 50.tB0 _;;�'
�5�+�'35=33"�=60—�__.�_...----_....____..._ sep� svc ._-- --_ ___ ._.—.._.59:"99----------- -�
i' -
� �t97. 3? 1'.;,I
��-..W..._--._�.___....__._.�__._�___..---,__---•--•-•---__..._.....__.______.�.......,.,.__.----___�. . ---_._____...___�._..—_......__,-.�
,:u.
i"'j'
@5-4600-105-15 gis eq splys 55.07" .'=;.
05-4Z20-233-IS gis eq 2l00Q.0?; �"�
�d5'�►�OfD=f05=�-5 ---..�-._�..___._. gas eq_..__�.._._�__ .___-,i;'297.-99.-�' �- ,,<,
�a:
15-42�0-060-60 g i s eq 1 y 060. 0�0 -�' � �
- -____._ _.__._._.... . ._ __._. -- -. ..._.-- •-- _._ _ .. __.. ..._..... ._._.__..._..__. _ ._____. -t�
4, 413: 06_. _ . ,.. ... _ - - --- -- -•---. ... _.
16 i4
,_
Qti-433@-490-70 part _ i7.49 _�
.__.....,�_�_..._�_____.,_____,._�__..._..---_...___� ._.._.. _ ___.�._._._---.... __..__.. __.__ .�---..- __�_ -.__.. __.__. __..�_________.._ �
17 17. 49 ��y��
----•--_... .____.._. _.- -.---.._.----..___.._. __..__...._. .____ _ �__�_.�.__...____ ...__.._._._._.._._..�__. .. .----- ,-:
�8=�t����?r10@='�_._._.__----_.____.�_.__,__._._�ttiT�iitt^._.-.---___....__._..._.._ 359:�75"----- ---'---- ,;-=
15-4330-490-60 4th qtr .�35.49 • yF
�____ ' � '
�__._____....___�..____.__----.. _...___. _.__._-.-----------------_._.�._. _ }^F
' it95: �4 ---__._ __. .---_. ._.._.._—. _ :�G'
.18 , <. � l�,i'';.�
0$-44821-0@@-00 ofc eq
� .. ..
x : ,, . .
?ck ,Nwitier 19 " • �
20
t�;� � .. . � , -�
�+r�: t'�.3':.�• r`? � . i " ^a e y'�,�n �f d k....
�ix :.V�.4:A'ih.`. . . � . . .
Check Number 21
.:�.'��`_�,';��'�`'t�:�� :�',. x� i � .
:i�."F;�£.+iiet^,$„P3iatt�: �
`:,�����*�� �� <;:Ae'�<`� ���'� � . i*'. � . .
, ' +s • ' k <''
, 0f-4305-@E0-20
. .. , - w,'ar; �
k76. 06
47b. 06
T(e Gii� �
��� Gl9 ' . , v t
aug svc ' 67.70 . "
. , , ��
� ..._r.... , . �
. f iJ OC}J 1?.�G •
Fri f0s�' "�
.`
-� Temp Che.. �Jumber
"�r:s°� . , , . �
. <
t' ""' Gheck '""
\ Q F, y-
. Y„ - �
s „�;�Niiinber; Vendor � Name •
_ .�...-
s 21
a Tatals 3etnp Gheck Number
7 P" 741,on{yW;«�.•?R'''�.C�e6 `.x�...<.�,.; �
e `s��°'femp;<,Cht�ck"�Nutiiber .
C!
s �:.�'cF��`, <, � `.."'i'e�^�?r.'� . ' .
2�
21
. Llazrns L:st
City of Mendoia Heic
Rccount Code
21
Page 4
.._..---•--_._.__.�_ _-----.__.---_...__.._._....._�._...._.��_.__._,__....----_ ___._._. . ._�___. _ �
Comrnents Amount
'' i
.___.__ . .__..__._.__ _._ ._ ___�.---...___.__.._--•--.--..._�._..,.,.__�.....--- - '
- ----• --------•-------------
b7. 70 � 6 i
5
..___� _.�'_ .__— _..__._- — ...... ... .. .. E �
. , , ��
, �, o
. . �!(.'
. ':iv
-""'-ilii�►305=ib50=�0"' .__.-.-___ __�...-�__ Sp�.�s _�.�__ _._---..____----__..___��3�5`--------•-�-�-
---- ,<.
13. 65
. ,a�
_._---��----______�.___ _..__.__.. _.�..__._._---...__..------_..-----.._.__.�_._._.�_,_..._._.__r...
i'ip'j:Y.'`f'.`: e•:•✓+���. j •�.i�{`t„^':. .. ��fi�
$:..
Ter�p> Ch"eck# Num�er'.:. 23 ... s,y�
,�,.,. _ _ ' �-s
�_. ...___�_._.._._-._...._..__...._.�_.._.___......_._._._,.._. ------------- -- _ � �
23 Orahz�m Mfg & Rruce Camrners 01-4131-020-E0 may thru sept premgarlock 273,75 ��=�
� ' ��_+
I<_:
�,���2 ,;�at;��•,.�;;�,,�°; .v,. . -__._ _._.._..._._.__...... __..__._..•-.�-- -�..�___,__.....��__..-273:75' '- ._ ,_,
;�,�,��;'fota`1`��Temp Check `Number 23 ��'
F:'. � � . - �
• '" ,'
empec urn er ___.��.__._....�___...._.,___,.... _.. -- -...- - -_ __.....__._ _ _.._..__ ... .... ..... -. -- -.. ._. _. _..�. .,
24 Greenleaf Tree Svc 01-4500-@50-50 tree svc 266.25 -
�4.:..':{z .--..` �. r:":s`" : . _..__... _ __._�_._._.__._.. � _._.�_,....._'_._____.�____.., _ . .�.._-----__._�_..N�..._._��.r.__�.,___--._---=—•—.r_._._---._. --- ';=
��;;;�:24;��:.,n•'�c-'.r�;•. ,..: :, .. ,. 266. 25 ,
,��'�TctaY�`sTemp;.Check Number 24 ��'• �
Temp Check Number 25
1'°j�'t"y
tery
��.�i,`,� e3ny .. en"'�ai"s , "�_ -""�-01=7f200=6'10=70"-_____... _.--------- ---- eq'�e�it•--___._�....�__ _ _._._._. __._... . -•-'105.48 _._.._._._.._.w_.__.__� ,.
�;�;���5 ,:f,; • ,., , 105.48
c a s emp ec�um�er --- •
Temp Check Number 26
es�: Y�.;c�:�, ;:a,,�,w ` .,.c � � .. . , - —
��^;�.26=�Hdwe.. Hank ;:;` :.. 15-4308-060-fs0
B„��z Yrs .�we<>x, 3:' ' •
�iri����'<�1dwe Hank - 15-4305-060-60
we »k '3=�t3�5=IIi30=30
26 Hdwe Fiank 01-4305-050-50
26 Hdwe �',ank 01--4305-@5@-50
���^;Yt. we an :.,:x '=Tt30 �"��0=60
� ; . 5.�
�>``26vliip3�we. Y•a»kra ;=�,:,,;., = I5-4305-Y760-fa@
:,.�;i�.'d'ht,�e�bY'�fY��� ~X��d�•�.T.e�'� ,g Ye.L o:: ' . .
,. , :•:g �; ,,�� • .
7otais Semp Cheak t+tumber 25. ,
emp - ec =. um r. :�>'.: .�.>;- ;� . • .�.,, ..;r.•. _ ,,
``f`4tv:�Y�`� ;�:�'g'�i x��d'�',;:'� „ x'.k :`�c<•";� °o-5!a,.,.z' � tl.. , •
� ������. ^�. �.=x';';.er',�'e� ;a�' 7:,.,..... '':;^',s . .`.
�:x ,m '�; .S°� `:� jz
^«,�„y27,;Wtiff�e�i^s�``�Yncr�` "`�, � " '��@1-4330-215-'70
27 • .
Totals Temp Check IVumber 27
���'�,;X;��^�;'�s°�:4�����°'s;:�r�•�.'�.o.f,:`.k ; . . . .
't`emp'<Cts�cic� !Vw»ber ��:,? -__�` , 28 • . u • � �
��„v3a�gr.�}�f�Y£,�;;��u�,�� ;.�". ti�PF;�., , � �� �. � . +,
^,�;mi� .�". .. ' �. � R.°�„'�"�i':TM:.�.�'..',.'�".:� .&s;::�w,'_ , „ .�,:�.Aez .. ,. .ba.-. .. .. . .
�
splys
dfSC
spl'y`s -`"
splys
disa
sp2"ys �..._._ __
C�iSC
splys
o.., : .
'�i'.:. :! g`'; ., �
23. 71
2. 23cr
--.... .- --.`c'^'7�l�c'_
15.94
i. 50cr
_"-"-'"35:�9-
�3. 34cr
: .;:, .
.� -
307:5C . . ,.._
3@7. 52 -
� �,z ..�< - .
�w'�»�-ir.::�,?'p...�• < , , . ,
�
�
13 8ep 19�6
Fri 10s`� �1
Temp Checn Num�er
�.Ghecli ""
.,..,;,;... _�. .. -
Z8 Highland Marine
Clafrns �ist A'age 5 "
City af Mendoie Hei�
28 , , _
__,_ _ .._ --- - --__._ _._ . - --. ..__ _.. -.- -.--_.__._ __..___. ___ .._.a._._ _._ ._. ..._ .___ __,..__�__. ._._..__..._.__.._._ S ; •.
=z :
Aacaunt Cade Ccmments Amaunt '�
- --_... __.,.. ---__._--.-. •----,..____ _,_._.._... __.___�._..___.,.�_..__._._____-_-..__-- •-
01-4330-460-30 ' rprs 291.39 a��
------ '
. .. ,»_��...,...�....._.._.._...,...___�.�.___......_ _. ,..� E
. . � ., �91:3'9 9
��Checli Number - b . 28 � ' • � , ` �,o r-,
.,... . . „:.
29I OS
c�3�
29�I�`0Y8�;
'29 `i2`.O`;S `.;f =
9 I O S
29I OS
89 I D 8
29 ^I :O �8-" < -
29 'I' O 3 '.
29 -._._...._._____..-_...__.__. ..___ __.. __.._..___�....._-.-----------,._._._ _____._--- .__.... ------_. __�____�_..__
�;
----- �,. �
� 01-433RJ-490-10 sept mten I@Es.75 �;e�
---- � ....... _. _... ._. _...__..�___.._ _ _. _.—_---- • -••---_...
01-�+�=460=30..__.__._._.._ _..._ ...._... sept �mten 17.-80"'_..__._._---.��._ ;,,i
01-4330-445-40 ' sept mten 17.80 ' `�R�.•�,
01-4330-4'30-50 sept mten 27.8R+ ' 3;;.
— .__. ._ ..._ _ �..._____..
0 -�►330-�i90'�7(��----- •---. _ -•_ ' sept �mten _..----- ------------ 17.-50...�_.__._____._....__.._---_�. _
-:�
01-4300-080-80 sept mtcn 17.80 �;-�
01-4490-109-Q�9 sept mtcn 17.73 �J;
05=.3►�30-490=i5_� _----__.._.----sep� mten� �--------•--- 106:75"- ��•.�
15-4330-490-fa0 � sept mten 106.'75 � • ;'�f:-.
. :.�:� �
�........---._.. _--___. - - --. ..._.-- • ---__ _. ._..�..----- -__.._ _ ._..._._ ._ _...._ ...._._...._�_. �+26:98� ----_.._ �._._ __._.._-=f:
Totals Temp Check Nuaraer 29 �v�
�- •.
;_ :
e...... _---• - - - .---.-. ._._. _ _.._._._s..-•-- -..____..._ .._..�____�---___.._----•--_._._---._._._.._._
�mp;�= ec, um r 0 -"'_ �__.__-�_�.._.,._._ - *,
d�,.`x7�.�Ko;�; �bPaa 5. . . iv
;� . ` .
a,'._30 Identi xK3t .ca 01-4200-610-20 3rd qtr i@2.00 �"'
30 102. 00 ;•.�
Totals Temp Check NuMSer 30 .� ItS".�`�'�
gXX.}ti �. ,y� • ��.�.. � ._.._.«_.�. ��. _"�_,_. _. . _ �. ...._�. .__...._.�......__. . _,...>.........�._��. ._,......._,..._�. _. . __.._ `__'�_..___ _ �_..�.�. ;t�
�mp T"Cheak Nuroner 31 -.
.Y� .. ' ♦
` i ny ers ate f3iesel_.—_.._._�_...._.v1�=+�3�0=4�tIJ-60.. _,--- -� --• --� .� ._parts "__....__.__.__._._ _�..___.__.___..._. -_-----32:�5_.w_._ __�..�____._..._�._.-�.;i
31 Interstate Diesel 01-4330-490-50 parts 58.06 i•�'
__ � .,
;��. . � , ----.---.-•---- --•..--...._.�_..._. ...�.._ ___. . _� _ .__ _._..._._.._ ... ..............___.__._. ..9td:31__.._.�.__.......__._ ___.__ ;•�;
��Totals"Temp Check Number 31 , ' l9��
>�;;<�:�:, .^ ' . . i� � �...:
. �., • .t
. ., . ., ---..._._— �-=
r , — �..._.-----.___ _ _____..__._—.... _.�..__._._...----.�-----.._ .�--- -.-..___..__.___.._�—_�_._.. ._._ .__,�—....�..__
_�,., e„ ..�, e� �---
32 Kamoa Tire
01-4330-44@-�'@
Nisnber � �' 32 -
Temp Check Riumber 33
gr�`, . r Y►ox�. ommerc �a a e a,�. .� - '�=0
'-���". - _ . . :
;_ �s33�^.t{»ox�;Cat#�iaei^cia3�',t:i^edit , - ..01-4305-0
��.��33�Kriiiii`'.Cciminercial-:Gredit .,�.,'��•<�= 01=430g-0
99 �
Tatals Temp Check.IVueaber 33
^�:�°'.fi`a.��"s�,�"`t,•'.'�.��""c'k�{s=zi:a.�"�•�".....a�'�*^;��.�. - . ..`%' , .�,. , ,.
i'emp�Ctieck.:Numtaer,.> 34
�.n;�S���X<��4:�""�:�~K'���%'�`='��,..�a'��:., z^;� _ d�.� s'_ . .._.��'�..arc`' ...
tirea
spiys
435. 87
435. 87
_._�'_.,Yr►.� .
75.21 �
94. 10
243. 52
t io bep iy�b
Fri 30n� '1
�� iemp Chec� Nnmoer
;;;;�s.�,T'emp. 9:� ,
�. . < :'�
•• : �`" `'CIY'eck ��, � " : <
s �;,�}�lumber.;Verid�ir"..iVam
�
34
Cl�ims List
City of Mendota Heir
Page 5
Accaunt Code Comment5 Amount �;
.. _..___._. __ . - - -.w . .. . �.,..._. __ . . .,. . ..-- -- ._ . ._.._ _. _ _-•-_._.._. _.___.�._..._�.
34 Kimtral l Midwest 15-433(II-490-60 Mi_�-parts- �� 92_03 ��e �
; n�. ..��'wfK"�`ptry', ' . . . �_...�__'",«..._"�"`�^,...�L'.��' � , �G
9�'�';:'�`oteil.su TempM�Check Number � 34 !�o �
,�;��;: �-'��p. `%.:�...;� ..� .
;:
emp ec um er --___.�---..___.. »_...----•----�..._.---__,_-- -__._.__.._..�._.__...._._.._..__....�_ .0
, ' . -- �,,
�.)
35 7hamas Knutt► 87-�4i5-709-00 ex reimb 79.4tD �;��
P
�=��:,�.,P . ;;.,, omas, nu�Ti� �---2e�+43�=718=00 -_.__.._._.__...._..... _.___._exp..reirnb . ._ __._.__, --- ---- • ---... 33.90'---.__...._..___.__� !
������°:��5 �Thoinas �.!(nuth 05-4415-105-15 exp reimb � 5, g0 ` e
��:-. :,� � f � , � �
�"�:�� :.�:���&h'`Y'�v:s�, ___--_ . iig
. : � -- -----`___—_._.. -• ---,. ... ---'—"--•---"-'""•---._..__...»_._..-- ---�........�_ :oq
'__t 19: 90.�__..._
Totalz Temp Cheak Number 35 ��..�
�emp•� ec . um r . � -•--�---... __..---__ ... _._�. .__.... . ...___..._ ---------- ------. __. _.__....__._..____�...� ?�<�
� t�;�;�z:?w�. . '� ..
�:r 36 K.r,emer S�ri»g � Align 02-4330-490-7�A parts 340.13 '-�
__ . -__-_____. _ ._..,_ _ _ _. _..... - • - -• - --._ . _ ..,.._._ _ _ _ -• __---- �... . ., _.�_ _.._....__ __._,_.�.. _.�P
36 3k0. 13 •
Totals Temp Check Number 36 � .
�:;�-=.r:e,a.:.r5 .: �° ,y �.;.ap " , ---------- --•- ----•----._- -�---_..._ ..__ . . - --_..- ---_...- - ----_. �_ _ __. .__ .._... .__ _ . . _ _ . . , _ � _ ___. __._�.�. _._�_
Temp�:Check_ Nuintaer . 37 • .
,:Y�".,.. }�ffi'vo-'; . ,.
.. us om� z na "s�nc � 01=433@=440-�Etb . � _....._._ • - .... . . . .__._._ _ --..,_ _�:
� ... .. __ .Qarts . ..�. _ . _ ._. �, _ 40:71_..�___.w_.__._�__.._
:,
-- ----- i.,;
.�% ��e %i I]4 �:."�
���"'8? a i�' $ eiiEp� ec' uiYi ei l�.._ _..__......-."'__.__.. _ .__.. _.._""'._».___..... _..__�_.._.. ... _ ..«..._.__ _ .......__.._""_._.'_"""'__ _ ._._.-��
;`�,^�;���";''.��; .,",'", t. - , ;<a'
Temp Check IVumber 36 �°�
.
__ _ . �.._. ... .. ._ ._.._� .... . ._.. .._. __.. .._. ___.___.. .....____. .. .__��...___._.._. _..._..Y. _��...._.r.�._,_.��._
'j�
38 Kaber cxc 27-446fd-713-00 pymt 5 swansons 6,499.02 .«�
38 Kaber Exc 27-4460�-717-00 pyrnt 5 ivy falls sa 3,4&1.3� � y
-- -----------._____. __ _._—....._
z.�A ; �"_ ., . -- ---. __ -___.....---.__..�----__.._..�____..____�.__. __-___-_ ___..�_ .•h
�,,";.7:"76`f;;���. '� .x�- = � 9,'980. 34 � � �
.�i .,
���y7ota2x�' Temp' C.heck tVum6er ` f ' 38 ��'i' �
----..._.�__..._ ...__....__.—...__.__ __...�_.____.._._._. _._ �__ ..___. .------- -- =,
Temp Check hlumber 39 's<�
i w
��5�
� xM.�., ;.. � : . • _ � .�.+.�_ sep"� p�t� 'S06f 99- . ��
�`�;�39"ts`�i+2 C.�Z�<.T• ' , • 01-4331-020-�sB ' �_�.__. Sept Prem - � �� ��8�
y,�t�..;.e. t... �,:�: s•i rr .r • 526. 93 ,�
;`6'.�.fi'..FN'�'".4.syb:�`!tkx' � f. i„' . . . . . ��....w���� �
. . ,. . .. � .. . ,... . � ,�. —i? Q10J. 9�u� e �
Totals Temp Cheek idumber 39 �6z ,
� emp ec '. urn er ., , ,.,� � -. , ,.:..r: • ,..a:, �
,.,.s�:�.�w,��,&Y���c��,p���4�' .;x .,�y ., :.,,�v�• :.�:.�,�. ::�: �..;� . ��:i ��S'
'�F".. ,��,';�10rv.z�?h��..y„s�x��� ��. s�'� �= �F.:��.-��eAa,`� .,..r�- uv"s;s;tiu'�:v�' rz*:,�;, � •
�L�gerguf3st Carp���,r..�°•,.�•r�� :'� :•. • @A"�--4335- 00-00
40 � .
Total� Temp Check Number 40
���� ��i �.,;;r�. $%.''"��'''�'"'�>v'r,;�9:.�, c.w: � a�� e',,, . ?„•• . . ,� „ .
Y. x.. :,t: ,.., .' ... ' .. . xM n
�Etti�l�L�'IEC��t,,� �UAIt3EYy`.� ,., � >�t1 - w
.:,�''�r.'A,"�e� 4"°�:z� ;ir�<.+'•`�¢'r.,�r^,',:e�y7z�izy` �.' � �iY>. r�?F'7_�?.,,.,x. , . .'°:."'�:' . �4'' , . ` .
. mtan
���:.,� .
. r . ,
' 97.5c^ . , .
'97. 58
��_..___ r ' ' °.
t 13 Sep Ip46
Fri: lm:'' 9
� Temp Chec.� Afum�er
��E
41
l3ame': . �' . -
�
G3airas List
City of Mendota Heii
page 7
. r .
• :2 �
Aacaunt Code ' ,Comments Amaunt � ")
_..__.__.._..___._._.. .._.---. . . . --•.__... -_- • -. _ _ ..----. ..... _._.._.. _.._,....-------�---- i
41 Langula Hdwe 01-4305-070-7@ splys 126.85 }�Z
-- ------ �'
1`�'����°� „, ;;y�;..� , , � . _. ._._._.._.�._._.. ___,....---_...�_�...�_�_.._ . . ��
o�als�Temp �Checli Number .. 41� : , , .. . —126: 85'-'_._._ ...___.� _ �
', o
..: :E
� ;`�. .�s.`�+w x: �i�TL. .- > .. - � 't t '
!.>. ,�.t.;. .! �.._ "'_"._.._ .."" _.... .�. .__ .._..... .�_......____...'__' u,...� _ ... _ . ___.._,__•
hec um er _ __ _. _ ._... --- �_`, z
i�' i
(t-'
42 �ake Cauntry C:�apter-----• 01-4400-i50-3@ _.. . hax rnat t�^ng f25.00 ;15�
�����? ��4'}c, ,� k.�' > '' �' .
�*���T"Eot�is"Temp ChecEc �Humber
Temp Check Number 43
:.,;�....v.$ , �e ros '_—`
�°�'�``'.;-q3,`Leef� Bi^os
,':-.."
.43.I�eeF Bros
" 129
Tatals Temp Check i+lumber
r:�,�,�a ; ° ;; .. � __-._..��
Teinp'Check .tJumber 44
� � :e n ur ari?�ews�'
A4 Lillie Suburba� News
44 L.illie Suburban News
�';-fw=;;,, .�, 3 ze u ur, an ews �"
�x>; ;'44,:"L:i,llie 5uburban 1Vews
'�.E;��,`44 L'illie Suburban kews
x e u ur-' ben l�ews
308
..� .,..�.. .�...,....,�.
umber 48
, . - -• --.... .. � . . _ ....._... _ _._._ ......_.._........_. . ,
- -�--. ..... .. _ _. __.�... ---. _.
. . . _ ... _. . ,._ . _ _. _.._.. .___..._._ ; �
42 ., 125.00 '. E
,
;,�
----.._._---_._---.__._ _. _ .._ .•.- ---.--. ---.___ �_. __. _.... ..._ . ._.... _ _. --.--._._..._.._. ---.. .._ _.._____._.__.__.___- =�'
. - :,
i.�i
' .�'�
i�i=rt3"',S'"a'-3i`0=50`-,------__•-• ._ _ .�_aug�svc""---•---___..._..__.._..---. ._..-•---..._.23.-01__.�..�.�-_...__ !�^!
01-4335-310-70 aug svc 23.01 �F
18r-4335-3itB-60 aug svc 23.�G1 "t
, _��-.---.._..__.._. .. _. _ .. ._. �_.____. _ __._ . _..._. .� . . . ----- .._ ._.- --- - ._.__.,._.._._._- :p.
69. @3 '
43 '
`�DDi=4"�c�"►0=6��0=i'z`---...... ....__.. _ .__.. .elec�ofc"no"t- ---. .. .. ._. _. ._..., •9:23 ._._ ..__._--- �-s-------_._ _.:�.
01--4240-080-80 hrg notices 55.36 '�-°•
27�424Q-720-00 bd ad sr hsg 27.5$ �'dµ"
- -•-- - - z,,•
�7=�2�#iDi="709'=00'-- _.__ _ _._ _.._ . b ii3 �' ad� curl eys ._ _. ... _ . _. . - - - ...54: 43"'-. __ _. ---- --._.—. .� ..--- --- -_
27-4240-716-00 bid ad mend meadows 63.6'S •��,
2'7-424tD-713-00 bid ad swansans 63.55 �`"
��0+ ="'7i�=�0 -^...�_,__._...---...._....__.._._bid ad�ivy'fails"sa...�..__.._._.,.___...___._63.65 ---_.__._._____.___.....�____.__-��
<,
337. 65 �''
44 ---•---•-------._. ,._...- .---• ----.,�..__..__..__.___,_._ ___., __..__ _.._____..--------.__--•.__.__._....___....,�� .o
.. . ' 1]J�
_ •---._....__-• - ---•--- _ .. __.._.___._ __.._..._____..... ____...__.T---.._..._ ,. __ ....._ .�_....._.___..._ __ ___w �:��,..
45 M A Assacza�es 08-4335-000-00 splys 161.88 �";
45 M A As�ociates 08-4335-@00-00 disoount 3.04�r �`'i
��;�'�90,;� .�� ��:°.�'�,• r4 <. . ,;,c . ` . .. . - � � ' .. . � _ -. .._ � .�--_�._.._,_�e.__ 158. 84 -�- ---. _.__--_ f3 1
,�Tota�'�.�Temp.Check �IVurn6er '45> �:'°I
Teanp Check tVumber 46
�:<.:� ; : ,; e . o ,�<; e g . s.� u s ,;,,w -. _ _3 _ -
�` �` ��fs,�hlePii3ata�He3gh�t�: Ru6bish � `';_'d,; `;01`=4335-31'0-T@�
5��,., ;.x4"6�ihe»iiot���N�igh'tg Rubbish `��� £:�'�"��.15 k335-310-60 '
k6 Mertdata Heiol�ts Rubbish 02--4335-315-30
iea
;���p� a a sxz. emp h'ec �� ian er f, � 4 .- �.R �
�a,`��"�;�x��"��;�'�'�C-` • ` �
��. �4 . . ; � _a.
�:°�'r�rc'�'��:�pt','�c.;�L�'�". ,`�'�°.�•r•�.a..ti �%�u'a:��m°�"t _ r"�s�" . »"s''._ n':x,£....' _, ' „ , p .
� aug svc
� aug svc '
�y aug��vc
aug svc
97,. 80
97. 85
45. 20
338.65
,
,
� aa aa� .ta�o
Frl 10:!' 4
� TBmp Ch�Cn NutRbet^
^n{.�; m ...�:�.�>•;:�s.
-• z `;:�Check�w; .,� ;,, ,
s ��,Atumber:.ttilentibr a �iame < � Account Code
M^Z .. �
4 y_
a 47 Mid Rmerican Rawer Dr 01-4305-050-50
a � .
� � k . —
� eg�?':�� �" � :�' �';-.czs�`r :�.n, .,. ._ .
, �5�.�,.'1�atals �>7emp Check lVumt�er � ..47 ,
. a'�����.:��.�;��:�:.:�`z, ,,�, , .
�o emp �� ec � um er """-
�,
�x 48 Mzdwest Phata Svc 0f-43P15-@2@-20
47'
�:iazras �sst
City, of Mendata Heic
a�.� _ ,�.
,'L'zT;°v�a�:!}8 ,'�_� "`` � � ` . , ", � •
;:�xs�,"fista2s b�I'einp Check .NuMbe�^ � 48 . .
Temp Check Number 45
��;�a, wes a a or - -"--iA3=4�3�J=
�p�y.;a'_�:�;��,' '". • .
y�`�` f. �'i�'�.v ' k e x
�}
o a s emo ec ure er `�+'�3-"�'"�
Temp Check k�utnber 50
Rage 8
r
___..�,..---_._..�_..---_ . . ,...__ ._. __. _. __ .._ ..._ __... . ,. -. - --__ ._.._. _. ..---.._ ..---_.__..._._ ,:.
:±
x; �
Comrneni s Amount 5
sP2ys � 99.05 _ ___._.__.._._---e
�,
-- _.�_ �_ _ _ ----- 1
_._.._,.,_.- -•---�99: DS.� __..._.� , 9
j'° ( .
�i 2
_'._.. . _ _ ._». �_......, �___. ..""...."'_'._...... __ _' .._...._.. _. _ .12I
���_ ._ _. ... . .... _. .. -•----� - �,.I
au svc 42.91 ,,��
�..._,....____.•_.--- -'�--•-•-�`--•-- -...�__..__. _._._._ .._ _._.._.... .. _ ._ _........ ---__ _._--•---- �e
. i;�
42. 91 "^t'
.._._..�._.._."_......."' ' " ......__'_'......_"_'""""_�....,...___. .._. . _.....,._ f
� - - -"-- - . ..- - '----.�..._..�»..... �.
�-:)
• ��
� ���a
---.—___...+_ _. -p •-- ----___.._ __----. �._.._.....__ �. _. � --- _ __........----
ar� s 137: fi8' � _ �?
137. bF3 `''�.
.__......_._..»... _ .. � .. . ._��. .^. ._.'"_.. _ ... . ._ ..,. .....___... .._ .. ....�.�_..' •--__._- :+3
�,.,£��; *,,,.. ---.... ----- . _ . _ . ._.. ... .._----.......�..------. �
b°,�:,�,:::50 �Mn COp Assn 01-4400-020-20 cop fall ronf 295.2�0 �-�
��'���'� �� ` � __.�_.----•---- _ _._. - -- --•----.__. _. _ . _.. _.._..__.__.___. ._. __ . . .. ._ ------ '
Totals Temp Check Nuaber 50
emp ec 'um er .
��r�',��?�q ; �;." .. • , •
s.°.,; $1� MAnnesata Teamsters Loc 320 fdi-2075
51
Totals iemp Check Number 51
p„Ch�ek. tJumber —�Y 52�---J�.--
d�.ais'.�"��:�,�", ,. . . �, .. ` .
S2
a.a s: emp ec w�t er .-.
�C1i cFi'iVumber � ' S3 - �<
53 Minrr Wanner Co 03-4305-070-70
.a�<t"�'�"k'�,"..�"`�;, . , ;.,�,� a�. t, a .
'citals -'%inp Checlt�' Nwnber � 53` . . � . ,
xr^�' :.a.�; ^s�, 'a,�, << ,.
�asE��a��,�^'��'�y' «�,� * ��. '
� ec� um� �. .r
54 Mator Parts 5ervice 15-4330-490-60
�y�.,;o@"�a�`a��ati»�st,:2rt` =°'..'� �'< `'4 � e "^4,�, . Ky,:, 'x$'-`+:. ,
�„<��,�y�,'+�s� . , n�"� .°s,3' . . +;, ' ' ' ` "�':.:^;e�:,;t�� -:t' ,
?s",.'.`�a:c"a�'�:%"�"r�",.wz,„s' =��✓y�:�»r•a;'4:a.,.. .." . ,✓ay,�. F fe'�;�""-�,.'�'>,. .
' 295. @0 . _. . . .._...._._. ._ .__._..__
��
'yzr �a:�
<;
sept dues 278.0@ "
^�78. 00 • ^�
_r
-•._.._._ ...-- - --_.. _...�_...�..4._. _......_.._���...._.._�....----__ _ _ .....___._��___-- . ............_.e.,�._ �__
. "'I
• i3��' ...
�._..... r_.... __..__. _.,.___ __...._. _ ... ...,.� � =. .
. aug sp1 "y"���""__..__.___�_..,_.. .._. _..-•. --- 854: 54 -._. �._..—_. _ _- -
___�_ i:<�
654. 54 !"j
splys
— k. � •
par�s
, t„;L�,':�§'a'�a:.� . . ' .
�
,
y �s �ep 2��b . �tasms �xst Rage 9 -
Fr3 10:� M City of Mendota Heir
� Temp Che_._ Number 54 . .�
"��� emp.�'�ya��"i ,`,. � ; : � . --....__..____.____..------_...__..__. ...._.__....__.__._... . ..-- -_._ , .. .. _.... ... .. . . __ _ _._.._._....._._..,
�.:�:- s.,;�;�'
. . 2 � CEi�cEi,s r�; '�;�' ,. ,; .. . :
�.�_ �.�...,,.��>. ���:. -�.;��-'�, .
* ��:.t�uatber�=Vendcr�.Alame'.;`.��' . • ' . Account Code Cbmments Amaunt = '
4 __. ..�.�_.._..__.,...."_' .... .""_.."^__""_... _"".. �_.. .._ . . _... . ... . » .a.... _'_ "
s 54 Matar Rarts Service 15-433@-490-50 parts 54.74
a 54 Motar Parts Serwice 02=4330-49@-50 parts 36.67 '.
�.;�,-.: � : 3r�,:_ ; t
� a'T�3 i *�" �� H•'��" ,�•a�.. ;r�3 �>�3 , �., r,.� .` .. , �.�.' .:k„ .. �.,':: , ' , . � _.. .__�._..,w.- �_ r:s--•.�.._..__�__ ._.— y
' • g����'lb2f��Yr,+;�v:,a����;�i:�,.„%xx,��;.:"r,.'.. , �f,'.���iz,;.,�a•�w:�� _ . �u
�: 115. 63
• `���,a��'Ti���als"£I'emp Check �Tiumber . �: gy' • • �' • -- - - - --. - . „�
,, .
�o. . _____ .._.._�.._—.---____..,�_.�_. .__. _..._._.� .__ . _ .._. . .. _ . . . _ . _.. _..__�._.__.�-?t
++ Temp Check Number 55
sz -
,a.�'��_ �,` o x,00n . , 1=T►435=�00==7�.�_�.- �--�-----� ---._____. •95""ump "rfd ._._.-.-•- -._... � .... ._ . ..59.50 . _. .._ ...__ __..V —`,,
�4 tf'jy #=�*�,��..'k:�yr`.:#iiH� N�'9:�.� t " '� ' . � :M1v �����. '
ia �a'�'��.t'?+7t.4�«�•"rAF�w.Ys,'>s4.���"`Yx . �'r"` • . • rJ�a wr?Yt �t
s! ,
.. ., e . ., -`. . . __..�.___,�......_...___..._,...�_"'....__.._. ...».._..__..«..
-- _ _. . .'_'""'..._. ._ _._ _.._ .._. .._ . »., .__ ,. _ w._. _ . �__' « ...._ "
�s o a s emp ec um er ��� , �,_
�y . . .
ta Temp Check Number 56 �"�
,n ,,.T.,a; . �::,+' q°C, " -��'�; �-, :,, s. > ' � . , . .. . — � ---__.__'._ __ .._.,_ - ---- _.____N.. _ . . ...._. . _ , _ _ _...._. . _ _..__... _.._ .._.._-- •-- ---- —
yj.... .. t. . i.3,�r.� . . . " , _ i..
`��,;�:i�"�36`'lVatio»al� Seminar 6roup 01�-4400-110-10 � 10/31 serninar 79.00 >5 ,
� �'' -- -----
,...,, . ,
._�__.._._._ ..��.�......___.._.- --- --_.W ._. _..... _...� __ ._ .---- - . _ 79.00 . _... .__.._,�...
; .,
Totals Temp Check Nwnber 56 � •�
`+.�`.:u�mpF, ec utn e�—" - 57___ _.._�._.___—____._.__... _--. _ _. , ..._. . -_ _.. ___ . _.. .-------•----. _._..._ .. . ...- - - . _ . .. -- - • ---_.__ .. _.._._ .
:��,��."?��1,��.:r�o'�'s;���..-�,•: _r , - .
��.�=;�57 Nelson Radia Cwm QJ7-4330-000-00 sept mtcn 6�.40 ""
57 62. 40 �,�°:MJ
" Totalta Ternp Check Nianber 57 ; n,
� r>°.;�-;�,��: .:: �; ., - _�... - ------ �-•---- ---� -- -... _ . ._ _.. ... __. _-._ _ _.__ ._ _ _.... _.._ . ._. .. ._..__ _ .._..__ _ _ . _,_.. -- -
�;�Temp �Check� Number 5& • <.
..e�, t� C� ::. . � r [ '
�.�' ,�: .
. T�',��.�.
esco nc -'"'—""—ib3=��i�S=�i�0=7tA-_�_ __.______._,_. --- -• splys-_.__.__._...._..e._.._...._ _... __. .._.8b:22 -- --._.___..___.---_._._.__<.
----_ ._.
:��;; ���V;�: o8a s:� emp` Gt►eck isiussber.-_.,_�._... ��.....�e -------------.._. _..---_.._. . _ ._. ----.. _. _. ._.. ---�...�__�...._._-.- .----•.--._._�._ _..._.._86. 12 ., . __ . _. .. _ ____.._.�=¢
�.au�"a'�o-y�,"�^..?N.l:: �;f�iF>`<K�;"��'�.':;' ., ISU��.
q�,Y��T�emp��Gheck `Number 59 �- - ' _.� ._._ _ _.__. ...�__._,_.�.---_. .. ..__...._.._._._.. --- .._.�._._—._. .a. .._.. _,.�_.,�-----...__._ .. ____.__ _ .____�__ _._ �"'. '
+ 59 Narth 5tar Concrete Ca 15-4330-490-60 parts 151.1� �'"'
59 Ncrth S�ar Cancrete Ca 15-4330-490-60 parts ' 31.31 ��°
u � �', :.N.<.; �F`�i'•.,,:. , . --- .�_.._— ___._—..�_ �.�___�_'-_...__--�___ . .._...__—... _ I'�
� t`
,n �x�� ��1`otal�� 7emp: Check Nua�ber S9 , `' . ` • 182. 43 ',y;
` �.��
Temp Check i�umbe�^ 50
•'� � o.r we5, ern � g4rega e ,,. • 5=�50=5¢i
` �, , �-«�; '$�,'i^;'�;,�',�,..�,��`<'r�e%��;-: a'�: "' ` " �':�
� :,u; :.>�e. � �z',�'..'.,. , .. ' �'' $,z� � '
$q.�'.�; • .; �: ^ n ' :t� j :
��:�....:,� 60���',� ,: 1'� :`.�,�''.� � � .
Totals Temp Check Nunber 6@�
Temp Check t�umber 6f
�`���.;f�`�i$;�Z��i<�•'z�;'�'��R,�' �; �:.'£ '�?"''.: ' ,.'^.7 '�.` �',.=r,r. � w,:' �:;;".c;�'o'�"wxd:,�„ - ;?. , „ ,
��,�65y_' Noi^ttierri£��<' �Y , .,;;, at-�` �s�-.01�.r- 4305-070-70
����ti•4��5,'�0vs^x�k:¢y��,'q���A�iDR!A�'.':.� , r�T�rY.._i;n`.': �,��.'fi.` 'lAie��y�"2�c�.- � � �
_ a" . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . $-�i..R.A. e ..R �t ., .
� g��Y�. ,�
. � � : e:'f +x !
�8= 26`� -
68. 16
14t1. i"�c
-f tS �ep 2��b
Fri 10:5" •
•� iemg Checn �3ucnber
62
Claims List Rage f@ �
City of Mendota Heig�
eCFt a=;'�'�".`' _ • '. . < . . .. > ; ., . . -. .
�.: ,<':. .. ,
,..�v ti...,;,.,. ,, s., r
,�. .:. .a. ,
6er.t;Vendor > Name ;. ;,' ' � -- � ;� : ` Account , Code � Comment s Amount , i
6! �larthern 61-4305-�70-70 sp2ys ?4.51 'r
�r
fii Narttser» • 0f-4305-@50-50 sp2ys 25.54 `�;
or ern ,� ,�;;: .;,,,.. ,� _ _ • s T- s _.._.. �_._.. - -
g W , � ��, , � . � ,.t • P 3" `.,—"1�03: 1'i"�-------.__.___ .f �
'j' "�� �%'.s=;a=R; ti�; M :k :�`� �' . , . , `.-;�.� • �
���'�""�'���:��'..�°�»_,.s.�, . �.« ;x � � > • ,. . . _..��_._ �.oltr
2�►�`i ��x:=> .;��;" ;.� , ...>,Y `, � , _.._,.._._�� - - - - 302. 28 ';I''
, .. . .. ., . , .
a a s emp ec um er .,_. _ .____ _r.�.,-_._..___.....----•-- ---_-- - __. ..._ _....___.. . _. _. ...__ ,
. `,: �
p Check Riumber 6C
,,.s; � , �,,.-._..__..__.._ ----- ....____ _....__.___,... -•---_.._._ ._._ _._. _ __. ._._---._..._. --
_._ _. �,.'
a'r .: .xa�:, •.�* ,...._ _.._..- • •- ---- -• -- . :
��62 'IVorth,Star Turf � 01-433tA-215-70 splys 4@3.54 =�F�
x'r""' :';jr'�,�i<- `",,ca��` , :r�
'�ft�t;V.. x,� -�e_v,.�, �. ���.. �
.,,, ,•. >.
.a ... , • _.__ _.,_.»._..�� ....^�.�. _--'—'^�"-- —'_...__. _._.,.. _
...".403� 64 _ . - _.--- ._..__ .. __. ._._._.'��
intal� Temp Check Number 62 •-�
_______� ; ...
.__ _._. ._ .-----._......_�-- -.� ._�-----.__...___.__._ ._____,.._�__ _.... _. , _._.___.__-----_�_..�...,,�._
p � ec,t7 um er � • • - _ ,_
ai:na .:r,. .. •
�vs.� � ,z� ` ' •
V`63 C}akcre�t Ker�»eIs 01-4221--800-90 aug svc 120.0@ �
125 .
° oT�'"Temp-C�
t"�v"C'+k„✓i�aa`'�^:4%'3�'.� •i"
�IkGheak IVumber
64
640UWa�''
:;��;�:a, • - �
�;�:;'7vta1� Temp Check Number
. emp ec uro er -?S
65 P C Computing
z ���ti �5 `,;9,Y�,�'^ j :.a ,' �_
���i•� Toial� Tem Check Number
.s��... p
Temp Chec}c Number 66
-6i=4�25=8�0='90'�_. �_. .� .---- - •-----..,.. aug svc"-_ _ __._ .. ..._. .. _...___. .. .. -- 246. @2 ... .. _. , _ - -�- :�,
366.0�
�3 --_._.____.�.--•-----�_....-----� ----•--•---..__�.._�.____.._._._�....,.._,._.--- ------�--•--�•-- --- -- -._...__... _._._,____._.,_..._ -_
08-4335-000-00 aug svc 89. 03 .,, .,�
M�_ ;; .
______._ _. _._ _..- _. _ _ _.__ __ __ .. .____...,_. _� _..__�.___ .__..._. _
_ .----.__.._,.. ._89.03 ' _' "
64 -�
,.,
01-4402-110-10 renewal 19.97 `�
-_..�.- .....__.�_........�_.._....._.._........'"_r_._...._.___'...«�._ �.�.........'_._.'_"'v._.«._____. ����� "'_,._. _._«.......�s._u.... ;�E.
65 19.97 • !: �� �
— ---_...__._....__._..�__._...._..___._..____.__.._._. ,�..µ-----------.._______�.._._-----�._. ..__.------------___._ -?i
n�i��j',.�;'^,��;'�w:.h��`C.•, ..
tiy;�
c.a s �"emp ec am�er `
p Check Number 67
;�<;�;�.��*r;M,�,:�'=;b-':: . �Q �< . .. , .,>.. :, . �: .. :.�:
�r67� P,. &'�H�Wtise��:, p'w:x R0. ^ x : fd1-4305-0SQl-50
�,� , h r p ,,�..i:.�. ;.. � ,
�µ..`.�k.'4�+.��.t;R� d� :T^"w *,'Z�'� � Yi.i�s';�..:. > ��+�",��i,��ry'�f' ,C -
�
Totaig Temp Check hiumber 67
p,. eq � um er, . , s.. ,
;;x� ��. r*•.,<�a�� ���;..
;,�`^Ys,��..�.�"��,e.»i.:�i'��,:..>.,',,� . ": ��• s . .
°��6'8: fiebeeca;:!?entel �>:�.:' , y .,;.* .-,'a Q, 01-4110-640-12 . <
sply5 � ,. ,
39. 97'
318. 12
F{: 3
el �c �. svc , . 1� 008. 00
'�'. f3 Sep 1�'a�
Fr3 10: � 7
'� T�snp ChecK Mumber
��I
Clairns �ist
City of Mendot� Heic
68
�
Page 31
���hecli`> �c � ��'`�� � �'::k;> .r � ��. � .�' a':' . .-. . . -
�.
;Nuintiei^,��Vendoi^ , i�ame� �- �"�r• .�-- •., >.Y ° > � ".Accoun't" Code . , . , , _ ._�_. _Comments _-____.. _____..-- --_ .._...._. ...._ .._. _ _Amaunt - --- • - - . .._
69 Rebecca Pente2 01-4300-640-1� elec splys f2.91 „�
68 Rebecaa Rerrtei 01-4415-b40-i2 .elec milegage 25.50 �;�
':�m�'z�,�:,,��.�;��°�^s.'r'���a����d?��� y.^,����'r's.". ..awt 'M ":a:,+• "'Q�..s.s�;."C`m�:.r_:yzr�c��: ; � ;t,. • . , _. - ��....�_r»... — — y I
*�'?�xyL^@4,...,,x.';`� rg:•.�y�?�r: :`;s.i�i.:•,`s . :'s" :`'S: yY�<;;t .:�;.r��^..��<;` kt' , , . i� (it45. 41 3'oi
�z�;x�ATotals�;Tetnp`'i�hecii: Numtier` . 468� �`:`"y '„'
,.. __.._._.._�__.-- -__,_._. .----. ______._._. _.---.__ ____,___.__._.. .. _._._�_.___--------
�--�:-
Temp Gheck �:um�er 69 �•
,:�
���:��;�; 9' Kete Papp3er & Sans �=4����=Q��5�5ib "'—_.......__.__...._r.._.._..s£ump-rernoval...�_____._ .-•-------�...------•75:00._._.._ _..______._._.___.._.._._.._ �:
�;�� b9�`�.�' �� �x`�<��"";; , ' , ` 75. @�1 "!
. , '..
;�, : r - . � ;,.
: ,� , �
_. , ..,..., . •,..
Totals Temp Cheak Nu�►ber 69 - .----..__. ...--- --_.._._..---__.___�_._�._._..._.. __....---T._.__._ ._. ._ ..�,. ._._.__..._..- ---
Temp Check iUumber 7Qt
�:������'��,:�,,,,,,4.,;•�: � . , . �. . __ ---------_..._._,......___..��_..._---------- -__.___. .._.____- ---..._.__..._��.____._. :
'z;.��,d70:ppwer"'.Rrasce Entrp, 01-4305-050-50 parts 29.72 .
�"... -- __--_ -
. ., . ---._ — ---. __---..___- - - :.
_.._.---.,__... . _._�___._. _. _ _ .._.. _ __. _... _
� 29. 72 " - .. _ .._. _ . . .-- -- -- - , .
Totals Temp Check IVumber 70 �
�: ;emp ec um er -_,.__- �.�._..�__.� _.__._.-__ _. . - . -.--•-•--..._.___.__ _.__.. _ . .,. ------____. . ._....._.
�s�;f::;,^ �'�: :": ',;:;; ;, ;;;, ,,. ,.
-.71_Rrofes�icrnal Turf & Renavatian 01-4330-�15-?@ fert etc perks 3,051.23
71 3, 051. 23 !30, !
Tatals Temp Check Number 7f
°:��:xt;;y�: . .�;,;:. <-,... . , .. --- — __._._�___.....__._.__ ._ .�_--••----_--,._-----.___ �... _ _.____.__._. __._... _... .�__ .____....�...-.---__ . _.... . . _ ___._,
�T.emp; Che�k Numtier • 72 �• ,
:.:.�.:>,. ,. ,<: ., . . : . � : .. . , .
��.,.:..a �,.�..� ...•. .
..._.,.-• -----------__._. ,. _ . . , .`.._._..._..__ _ ...__ ....._. .. _ ___ . .�._.,. .. . r
u a mp�I'�"�e�'Fiss» f=��'7�r`_` .� oc�' pi^em 108: 0Qr ' __. _. . ---•-- -.-,
72 public Empl Ret Assn 01-4131-110-10 oct prem 9.00 -�
72 Public'Empi Ret Assn 01-4131-020-C� oct prem 12.QJ0 "'
y:_��s�,�,�_ , _ .,�,: , , , �.$ � . --•------�------------._..�__,._ ___.... ,._,__-_ __-�._--- -.._._ ._ __... _.__...-- -- -...__._.._ __.__ .: •�a; _____.._- -- - -- _.-•-- ------;�,
x,�:::;21sb r�.�"�:;�,..�:�•�.�,, �::.: i.' 329.00 ���'..?
�' 'T6ta3s�7empo-Check"N�kier 72 ';,`
�Temp Check humber 73 �^`'
uar er ec e �"`�
� +�,�g,+'r'>'t.''�`,� ` �. �. . '
3-e� w.`'�'�`:�;;��� �.^;',:�3`� .
ta s emp Check Nuasber
Check humber 74
�;�a:�x:�":;��:f.,� .�..sra?~=�;'`x�"'.� . . ' ' �
�7,,,4:;-�Bi^ratl��s~iRa�jary=3nc,�= ' . . 01-433P1-49@-50
=�'74=,Bracf"�Ragan`. inc �; � � ' 01�4330-k90-70
ra agan nc 0-43 - 90-70
?4 Brad� Ragan Ittc 01-433iIl-490-7fIl
%rS="�;:::��;;� �„���= k*� . . ..,�:.: � .. .. � >., . _'
�^�A'i�� �e �y
�Qt3�.'S;.TEF7IQ .�i'lE+Cit #�t2Mi�tG'Y' ` .' 74 ..
���;,'�e,?�:�"�:Z:�`'"r���.'�`�''`"t,�t:`'r .."�: - q:,,,>.• ..> _.> ,
���
. ---- -� .._so�tware _'"-------- - ----- _.�� i'�s7: 65- � - --- •--------.-_ _ ___ _._---e;,
isuj
16%. 6S :�.�,I
rpr� •
._ rprs �
�rprs
rprs
19. 01
i9.01
�+..�.�"i'3. �i
38.01
is 5ep i�b ,
Fri i0:5"
Temp Checn nfum�er
P. , . .
��`Ehecfc�; � , "
N#imtiei^�:Vendor,�<Name q � `
75 St Joseph Eq
.�%y.x�'t `''��`' �;R,�i';, ,° �%xr� ,,n�i�
S�d^ �"DiL. Y �i 3.
�;��'��'otaZ's�.Teirip; Ctieck,lVu
.s�:Y .,� �<.'�s,"xx
4-!F'°:.�`..: "
emp� �ec um er
7b S M Smith Ca
78
Claitns l.ist
City of Mendota Heigl
.. Y' .
i, ' .
' '�Accounb�'Code .:�
01-4305-@50-50
s4 ���:. .�x... /1'l �@:�. .' arrL•^y.'„ .S � .. e. . ..
�er`. . • <`�A �75�� .��•�` `�<.• ,
. . , . .' x��: • �>.._ _, . .
td1-4403-@30-3Qs
Cempe° Ciieek °t+tuaiber. ` �;x:4 75 ... '`.�;'�'.:,`�°;. • . " .
Temp Check humber 77
+�f*,�;. ;. �. ny, er rug ore� • . -* 3. �i=�+385=ib5ID=50 . —
�' ��;7`7,_Sriyder`'Drug' Stores 01=-4305-070-70
.. �,,�
`;77�Snyder Dru$ 8tare� 25-4305-ID6@-6@
ny er rug "`5�are� ---._�__""'��0'I'=�305w030=30__ . .._ __,_
77 Snyder Drug �tores 01-4305-030-30
77 Snyder Drug Stares 01-4268-650-10
�,�;;�:r�;;. �.:'-..»y er rug ores —0'i="T►305=03ID=30---__._-----
:��.�:i:"?�7r�Snyder Arug 5tores 01--4300-110-10
�_... . t��:,,
;�` �% ..� � - ' - � '
7atals 3em,p Cheak Number 77
Temp � e um e .. �78 _..---•----
<�r k��; � .. , � . '
.... '� 7II Cn.�+7"e�.m+ T.�.wi.nn A1 �4'2'2A..4GOi—^..�G towing C}')[j5
Camments
splys
trnq spiys
Aage iC
Amount � �
145. 63
39. 00 ;' ` �
�! f
......'.�_. .�,.....___' -....... _ _ _ rr���� __.'.__.....__.. . �_.....____. __7
39. 00 :, E�
;SFF
�..�..__.�_.....�—_'...�.�._..s.___.......—_ _.�.... '.�j
I
---- -••2t:35� ' .. ��
sp 1 ys 21. 35 '�«
spfys 22.3i "� �
: r,
_ _ _. _..Splys�---- . _.�. .. .___.._ _.. ._ _ _....._._ . _._.._.7.55 . _ .. ___.._ ..._ ..._.__.... _ ....
sp2ys 7. 76 -s
spi ys 5. z0
::
�__.___5��.���.. -_•- •- ----.----.___--- ...__ ._ ...- ---•-- 11:79'-.__ _.....__.__..____�_. _._-____.__ :
splys �14�3� :• •
78
Total� Tema C.heck Number 78 �
+1:i" , r n , i n . �__....-....___.�..._ _ _
p;;Check i�umber , •:. • 79
. �.'' , . �
ou vsew ev i=�+33@=4�+�tr=�0-
79 Southview Criev 01-4330-440-'�0
,,,7.otals��Temp i Check Nuaiber 79
k i'�'`j�� 3' .W4„���.` . r�i, j .
'(1'.�.�'t.. . �"l :."S , a, f . -`i h% , :'%
p ec um er
80 Sauthview Oarden Center 03-4500-050-50
w; ~ ou v,. ew -. ar en en er ., - 0ID=050=50-
�..., ,,.,- _ .
'�+.�8lB:..Sisuthv3.ew"6arden Genter . , 01-4500-050-50 ;
'r�',.�.,�'��,�r:'wy'� as,>„�3^ ;`�� ;,�,..� ,. ,�4: �. , •
ti;
Tata2s Temp ChecFc htumber 80
p°- ec,y . um er ; ; <. . ° � , .. . , . .
+.'����j�..2"'�;�s,�'t�"�:e,q�,.°'ntfh:'�e�"C��'5.�.,�i. V4.:'y.k}`� ' . • �'•
�;'8i�.$�'�te�;Treasul^err „ '£��. , <�. �'"` 01-4400-040-40
. _ . ��^...
"rQ"rs'_'--.—__
rpr5 �
sod
sa� �"
sod "
�o �" ed siummaries
,_ ...r
12@.64 . .
. ,s �.�
1 @6. 50 ' :
1 @6. 50 �
�+. F_
._.......___.__.��__..�.T._ -._._w_._ .� _ j<'f
. '�i
�.,..
__..._..---•----�.._�_.._..3E.-49"'-�---.._- �.r. �,?;
85. 8k �,:�
..r����. S,� /
_..._�_.. .__..__.,�...._y.i���wl _._..__.�..._ .._. "'�
.4 _
�^F�
F
. ���
39. 94
22: 78
23. 96
40. 00
r��
, aa aap aa�o
Fri 10:� 'ri
'� Temp L:he_ Number
endor Name";
82
c.iaxins �ass
City of Mendota Heic
91 .
' - • ��:Accou»t Cade ' � - �_Comrnents �-
um er : �"a ` ;.4 µ��vE,�y�.: ,Y< t�;���r'�„`�. - '• , „ , . � . ,�a� . . • ..
;,,�
. .. �`'�,��,t'..:,�".4 .:;�;.�� ;,,� ,�„�' , , � ' '``��.' , . ` . ,
Page 23
Rmount
40. Qtfd
� �82 � :�� •:�, s,�.,. . . -��: � . Y • . � . . �, , �t,,
•, z
__.._.____.___-_. ;��
82 8tate Mutua: Ins U11-4131-02@-20 sep� prem 137.54 ��t�••
�� . � �����.� �. h�
e�Y� :f: __...._��___...._�_....._.___........__� ..._.____137.-54_'___...�_ ..__._---•----- • � �
��Tqtals Temp Check Number • 8� � , , �'�
�'� �x. .n�:k - .� . , � . , x:< . . .. ' . . . �,:.; .
�i�r� 5=� ° ` i _�,..___�.___ __._..,____._�____.__ _ '
emp heck Number 83 . — - ---.---_.._._._.�.__.::
j.:> , �
83 Tierney Bras � 0f-4220-@8@-80 upgrade 27f.20 t"��
'���;` :� erney ras . - �=�8�i=6�`—` . ____.._..._ �is eq ._._.____ .—__.---2,'S50:�'8�------...._,_.__ .. `
� a"155 � 2, 8�i. 78 '�
- -. .._---.__.. .._ _ _. __._-------- -._ ... -----�----- ___ ..._
_�___-- --•-•-----• ----__. __. _..,.._. __,_.._--__---_._._. -_ ;y
a a s emp hec`Tt�u`m`ber "� �3
emp Check Number 84 �
_.._. --------•--_ ...._-----. ___._..______..._ ______-_._...__._..__.._._.____�_�____...- --___----...___
�,;x�;;�t:-,=.,,.. �. • . , • _._. __.-------_ _...---• -- ,
�^^�`a�84 7ime Saver 01-4130-110-1@ planning mtg 188.S0 -
,_.g»«.�.4. .
6 i ....���.....
, . . . _..» __�....�. _.........�r_�._...' '_" ' "" �.. ...' ._' .." ' _' '"' ' _.._ .. . ' '�'.«' '........._._.., _ _ •
. . �y ¢(�. . . ._ .., .�� __._. . __..._. _ __»`. .
' ' _'1�0� aJYJ ",.._.
7otals Temp Check Number 84 • "�
. j,a�. )
. ;,�
emp;CFecTc umN��er ���.- _ __.______-...._._._.�..._. _�..-----.._..._._.._� ----_..__._._.__.__...-- --�___.---_____..
�'"�85 'Tessman Co 01-4330-215-70 splys 417. 46 '
85
Totals Temp Check Number
r,< ��s
'p $t;heck Pfurnber 86
4` �: "•�' ,
, 8fs Tapco
s���,,� , ,, , .
��.�;�.t.
��.'fatal� TerrtP Check Number
�=�5'' '�"..H
'w ��"�s>:.�"''ac:yg".�`^s.: ' ..
emp Check Number B?
a�
.e 87 Tractor Supply
,o ..:�.��. «:.. W . , . rac ar upp __._ �.
`: �.tpe., "Y.« ,
z��� ���•az�;:3'ractor -suPP1y
s� �,�`dr',;,=� ;`� . .
: 4.� , v.�,.?«.�:.
a
a Tatais Temo Check ttitumber
M
aa :.`;' p
em '. ec um er , �
aa.<.� �s��,g:�..-4;-.b. . „ ,
� ���:';.,�g88 -7urF Supply Co
�-_ _._.__�....._.._.__._.----_._._�._..._....__ _..._.._...------.....__ ...._ ._.. . .�__
- ---___.__- ..__...,_.___._._ i�^,
417. 48 � .
85 �p±
- -___._�... ._.-_ _.. .�_�__�__. ---. _._..._.�.___.._....._� _...r_ .__. ..
_ . . _._.. __..._--------,__.__ .�. _.______._..__w_._ �¢�
. .,,.t ..
.�,,". :)
�b3=�+T+�itl�50�t�.-_._._._._._---_.____.._. �U�� �Ymt_---.___�� .�_.._�_._....---__....-- --105:3`�cr-_.__. _..._�___._._._.__._.._.-!M1z'
01-442@-050-StB s i gns z47. 98 �`..
is �
.�.����... I .J
_ ......���...�.�� � .
, •-- ------...._.-._.._.___...__..---------------142:8$ •--�------�..�_.._�._ _-
86 � '`:f�
� . :=�i' .
01-43@5--070-"70
, -0�='F�
� 01-43Qt5-070-'7'@
" �t.�u .
87
01-4330-215-�0
splys
spTys
splys
lys
22. 40
_ �g: �� :__.._.
21. $5
_.80. B1
y �.rc+.i J ��+
Fri 20:5
- Temp Chec►c rlumbe�^
F�
Veridar Name
88
$8
��; �r o a s; emp ec um er
> :�-.�,a�
�:�:���'�,�',``'�. ,.�y� 's' .
`Tetnp.,Gh�Ck humber 89
89 7op 7emporary
89 Tc,p Tempc�rary
`�"�5�1:78,.'x>mY�z �, '• . -
�}:•�7�tals:Temp Chec}t Nambe�^
x,.
Temp.Check Number 90
,;,���i;�'30 racy, .ripp ue s ---
�Ya L� v '
,a7`„,�'"`�".'�g� � « .
�� o a� s emp . ec umTer -'
Temp Check �:umber 93
y r5(:o�♦,..
;.�91;Uriiforms Unlimited
: .'<=--.
Totals Temp Check Number
TF{� _�M�ttf�JEY'
'A.;�"' .
°' 92 Unaiversity af Minn
"'�3�-LT»'ive�^sx'ip`a�`T+tYnn -_
92 University of Minn
92 Univers3.ty of Minn
s,>,. n vers of�i+Tin» �--
�460'" � �` " � � . .
a a s emp eek��e�^
np Check humber
}"f,C�.k,t; y`�';�•.
��`+33y Va11ey� Qaving
#�„; ::�;n,;;:� , . �
�..:aa�ns �.xss
City of Mendota Heigl
Account �ade ' �
01-4f30-120-1@
fDi-413ft-f 10-20
8! ' . .
Comments
>. . ' . �� x .
. . ,<s .
w/e 8t23
wle $130
Fage i4
__ Amount �^ __
em. sz
554. 00
554. Qt0
i, 108.00
�al
..f.� �
,��i
, 'z;.� .
�_`..—BS=i�Ci�""�--------...__..,_.___�_ gas ----�---�-4;794:"0�+"____..___ __ ._ ,z��
' � ' L64�~�
4, 7�4. iD4
,
: F,
.�_,__�3Qfi __—_.__--------------------_..._ __ _ �-___.---�__._.____.-----._ _..- • -� --•--.,.. .--•--- � . . ... ...... . .. _...- -- � — - _..___-; -.
N
i.' .
— . � �._—»......._""_'.___ .,...__�...."__.._.._�""._........__.."""...�..«'_'......._. �,..__ >3
01-44'10-0P0-20 splys 358.95 -
.r _ _�__-------�_.._____ ._..._ __ ' z
___.�_. ._..�._..,_ __._.___._..
3'S8.-95._..__ .. ..._.__�.._,__..�_
•,
91 '���
_ ._ _ �...__.---. ... _ .....__ —__.».---� ..__. —_----.�.�.�M_. »__...__ __ ».---_. ._ �...�...__.___..... __-- '-----_..��.._ � a•4¢i�
i` ��
01-4400-050-50 regr oiund ��.@0 `,
.___...��0i-`�t�+6fD=@50=5f3__..,_..__.__.._.________....__reg"r""so'rby --.......-.._ .._-_�.._----w,^cQ:00"--...__........_..._.._��_._�..___n3,
01-4400-050-50 regr burraws 20.00 �•E'
01-4400-050-50 regr oster 20,00 �a;�
__�._'_@S=�i4�Qi�050=`50__.e.___�_..r__..._---_--: i.;eg'r"`ri8a�k -- ...�.—__....s__._...._-----20:00____._..._..._,_...__._._ �.._,o:
� 1 @0. @@ i�°�:" 1
..____._� - -...______.___._ ____ _._.... .___.._.__.._..__._._.�.___.�__..�-•-...___.---...__r�_.____.._ _... ._____._..�__ -��
�:
_______._.._._ _�_ �_-•--- --_ ._.`._____.__..._..____._..._._�__.-_1
�v'i
2�-4460-709-00 pymt 4 curley� 27, 27m. 70 ��i
�u
Tatals Temp Check Number 93
'��*�''.^�' '� ?.. '` . .'. :��:�". ,'�..t;e> ���
^..:��;x.`, '>''a3' * `s.. ":'xH:' .>3;. ,•i,;.v�, ; �,:�.'s
.p: s;.,�:
;;x ... • � .
. ra'�, . .. " � '
�� e
_ . �._27, 270.-70_.
134,083.14
. ' 4- _- � . ' MFtNUA� CHECKS
w
• � ca
��° ' 15484 3,96I.91 State Capitoi C U 8J30 payrolt
t4
e. , , 4 , a,e,;.
.b
xt�i . . .y w . . .yij�'r'r. .v,ti,.e.
:�,;, , :x:
, - - "1b985 ! �24:25�Oakuta BaP�k.-'_�___..._ �etty ca�'
• s 15986 150.00 P14nn Dept of Health plan rev9ew - ''
eII � �15987 i3.84. PERA t3130 payrai?
� , . ' --------._. .__.. _.._._-.__.__.---.__-15988._._._9,174:10_—„__ ..��.._.�_._..__�..„—_.�.�.._
��� 15989 955.14 ICMA "
1599Q 245.00 Minn State Retiremeni "
� ._�_��..... --.--•-----_.__.. ___.,. ___15991-'.�'._300:00 ~Gt�c'�t�Ylest`L�& A�i-""�""
��_w `G
'L� . 15993 �l312.55 DakoiauCounty " - .
.�"-'.""25994_.—._.._.._405:Q0'�akoia Ba'n`k--------„--
} p .___.__ _._..___�_.._._._�.___ 15995 3,857.35 Cam Revenue "
k.1 15946 25,877.65 Dakata Bank "
i___�..�---- -___�. _ ._�. . .,.___ _ ..... . ...... ... ....--.--_ .;5997 ...__49>253:51-��" r3lira c '
� s `�' J'-._.Y_.».,__.__.. _. --_,..�r�_�__...._--
15998 124.60 Cunninghams election splys
�rI ��� �� M w_ � 15949 � 3,683.37. Gomml Aspha3t wear mix
}ri _..._ . --. ---- . _..----------16000 ZO:Ob'-MSi7tA.___.__�._._...______ regr" --
�'°_'� 16001 50.Op �iSSA . regr
}-_' _..___- -__.__._ ____._...___.d. l�flfl� 168.29 Carbones el�ectians
� _ _ .. .. _. ..___� . _. .. __ _ __ ._._16003 � _ . . 345:00 -MSFCA�'C6rif _F _ ..._..__ .____. r�gr _
` � ' . ,
:• �, :.,:.,... <. , . • •.
_# �_,._.�..___.,___._,_._._ .__.... ___..- - - - .--._._ .__.._. ____. ._.. 91;332:37'- ----._.---_..._.�_._....._...__._.__._._._._ .
.<<i .
Y"; G.T. 225,414.71
�,Z,_�._ ___..,---__ ..__.----_. ...._--.• --.--- __ .. ..,_._....�_..._. .... .._._._____.__��--------_______.__.___�..__
�u � .
�F:; . ,
tt:.
. ... ""s._..�._.... ....._.__-:.........�_�...� _._.._._.." "' "'... . ......... "' _'�... _.�. __._.._� �..__..�._..��_ .. '•_
i ���._r..�_. ��_......�_.. __....,__,_.......
.,�F. � +.
2Z
OtZl ... ....« .�_.__.._r.'"" '"'. _ ._ .. .. _......"'.-.._..._-�..�..___�.<._.�-...._.._.__�...�._
:! �..........__�......,...._ ._......._....�_.-,.. ___'.. __ . ,.. _
bi�
'8 t' . . ,
'���_..�.�..�_� ...,�._"'.._'_.�.........__.�..._.."_'_'.....__.�_...'..�_'_�._.____.._.....�...._..._._.__�_�___..�..��...�_. ___ .._.,� -
�F . '�e . .
�
� =t �
, . . . , ., ;:,�,.. . . � , �;�
-- n
�
' �_
� 02
6t
9t
LI : !
_��.� 91
Li
� 4t
" £{
Z{
. ll i
OI
• ' . . '� £a ' w Yq�qAY B
� . V �� .n*. � :��. . L
a ` ' k'«.'': � � : S c
a . ,J;`, .a'�.+ <. . :',�_ _ .t
" • ' : ' •1 ' x.t��i ����f;..� &v.K..t��.�..`:�
� y , t'� 6 r S 1A� s•'fr16r .,i;kX'm�m. L,v.> T.M„'^Ce+i' Sx�14�� � M•�e}4: W~ a.�"R'}�"qFld
`'i.viy.'.:. .>:''. '.4.,'.'.z�.�'•ea� :✓�?
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS
:� •
September 11, 1996
Mayor, City Council and City Adn�c�u�'u�istrator
James E. Danielsan, Public Works D'
Bid Award - South Plaza Dri�e Extension
7ob No. 9b06 Improvement 9b Pmject No. 1
DISCUSSION•
Bids for extending South Plaza. Drive to serve the new Dakota Caunty ��RA Seniar
Facility now under construction were apened Monday, September 9, 1996. T'here were four
plans sent out to patent�iai bidders, however only two bids were received as fallows:
Ro-Sa Contracting, Inc.
Centexville, MN
Bituminous Roadways, Inc.
Inver Grove Heights, MN
Engineer's Estimate
sm �ourrr:
$56,749.00
',• .•1 i
�,� 1�1 11
The bid came in 38 % over the estimate. This is a bad time af the year to be bidding
work because most of the contractors are very busy and were not interested. Although these
bids are high, it is felt that we would be unable ta obta�in better bids this fall if we reject them
and rebid them now. The aniy way to obtain a better bid wvuld be to reject these bids, and
rebid the wark for sprirng construction. Ms. Kari Gill, Deputy Director FIRA, informs us that
they need at Ieast the utility work to be camp2eted this fall. She, therefore has requested tl�at
the project be awazded as received.
There was one caveat in Ms. Gill's request, we neglected to inclnde provisions for
Davis Bacan Federal Labor Standard Provisians with the contract as is require�l by all
Federally Funded work. Ro-So, the law bidder, has agreed ta incorporate those standards
within their contract at no extra cast and has signed a change order that accomplishes that need
(see change order no. 1, attached).
�' ,
RECOMMENDATION•
Ro-So has done work for the City before and is an excellent contractor, I recommend
that we award the contract for South Plaza Drive extension to Ro-So for their low bid,
according to HRA's request, and to approve Change Order No. 1 incorporating the
requirements of Davis Bacon Federal Labor Standards.
ACTION RF.QUIItED:
If Council desires to implement the Recommendation they should pass a motion
adopting Resolution No. 96- , RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SOUTH PLAZA DRIVE EXTEN5ION
IlVIPROVIIVIENTS TO SERVE SOUTH PLAZA DRIVE (IlVIPROVIIVIENT NO. 96,
PROJECT NO. 1), and pass a motion authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to sign Change Order
No. 1.
� ' �:
`
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF SOUTH PLAZA DRIVE E:RTENSION IMPROVEiV�NTS TO
SERVE DAKOTA COUNTY ffitA SF.NIOR HOUSING
IlVIPROVIIVIENT NO. 96 PROJECT NO. 1
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the proposed construction of
South Plaza Drive extension improvements to serve South Plaza Drive and adjacent areas
(which improvements have heretofore been lrnown and designated as Improvement No. 96,
Project No. 1), bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law and the following
bids were received complying with said advertisement:
BIDDER•
Ro-So Contracting, Inc.
Centerville, MN
and
Bituminous Roadways, Inc.
Inver Grove Heights, MN
BID AMOUNT:
$56,749.00
$63, 690.50
WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommended that the low bid submitted by Ro-So
Contracting, Inc. of Centerville, Minnesota, be accepted.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RFSOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights, Mi.nnesota, as follows:
1. That the bid of Ro-So Contracting, Inc. of Centerville, Minnesota, submitted for the
construction of the above described improvements be and the same is hereby accepted.
2. That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized aad directed to execute and deliver
any and all contracts and documents necessary to consummate the awarding of said bids.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17th day of September,
1996.
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
CITY COUNCII.
CITY OF MErTDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
P.0-SO CONTP.ACTiNG. INC TEL No.612-429-0471 Sep 10,96 1S=<3 No ov�.'�.�u�
� � a : M •�. yx � �• .. >R'.`fqr�v fi+'8'".'•!',"""•w'.i'�`,.' 'i;4`•�1r;s
` _.._.. . i•� n rMrw• ��h�'(r"Fn'���i� i .4. �CC..�.��•_.� _'�;�'•� . � 'I • .. ' �': � . �� a. :: :''^ . � r'i5� ���
� �
CITY OF MENa4TA HEIGHTS
1 i 01 Yi�torl� Curv�
Mendota Height8, MN 65118
Septembar 10, 199�
T4: Rv-So Ct�nttecting
7137 - 20th Avenue
Centervlil�, MN 55038
FRON1: ,�l�OE ORQ�NQ. 1
Sou#h Plezn prive Ext�nsions
Job No. 8606, Improv�m�rtt 96, Preject Na. 1
Ganttemen:
The tailowing work, d�viating from tho basic con[rect for the above �rojact,
shati becoms part of that contr�ct and shatt compfy w�th tf�s drawings and
sAeciflcatlo�s fat the project.
The C�BG convact pravisiens and the F�dorul L�bor Standa�ds Prov)stons
muat be it�co�rporatet� into th� contract approved by tho Mendote� I•teights CitY
Cau�cil and the required wage rates must b� pald. A nowr wagcr rats
determin�#ion tor Neavy Consvuctian (appiieabie ta the utility instaliation} wiit be
farthcoming within ihe next week, the corttracto� must also �gres to pay tho nc�w
wagcs for Heavy Ca�st��uction.
' �OR C�NTRACTOR:
AcCBpied: � ' � fl '" ��
(Date�
James E. Dan�etson
Public Works Director
GlTY OF MENDOTA NEfGHTS
gY= ,�.. . �
tM�yor}
t3y: �5�. �30�r"t.tu+,c�- By:
Ro-So Contracting � {Clorkj
By; Ct1tK� 3'���,RU"i-�.fi Date:
Ruthoriz�d Sl�n�tur+� and Title ,
P�,'.� tS�ti.ts"T"'
,.
c ',
�
�
'�
�+'�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
T�i�
September 16, 1996
�
Mayar, City Council and City Adminis to
Guy Kullander, City Hall Building Manager ��
Bid Award for Exterior Paint and Stain Repairs at City Hall
The #ollawing firms were contacted and appaintments arranged far #heir
estimator fio tour the City Hall building to review the proposed work.
1. Mitchell Painting - Would not guarantee work could be
campleted in 1996. Bid is for
Spring of 1997 - �6,150
2. St�ward Painting - Bid submitted - $5,9?0
�
��
R&R Ciean & Seal - Bid submitted - $3,35Q
Fresh Paint, Inc. - Taured Buiidinglwork site - 53,9$1
. . . . r . . -. .... . . . . -.
. f i � • %• i '• w• i i i i• • ` t
� _ * ��. �� , . � � � � ,
I recommend that the City Council award the bid to R&R Clean & Seal, Mnc.
This is the same firm that was recommended for the repainting at the F�te Haii.
The firm proposes to foUaw the cleaning recommendations provided by Cabot and
wiil be using the same paint and stain originally used when the building was
constructed.
' •1 : • : �
lf Council so desires to mal�e repairs ta exterior wood and metal surfaces at
City Hall they should accept the bids submitted and award the work to the low
bidder R&R Clean & Seal, Inc. Council should further direct staff to issue a
purchase order in the amount of $3,354 to R&R Ciean & Seal, tnc. upon receipt of
proof of Workman's Compensation and Liability Insurance.
GDK: kkb
� �
FRO�M : Panasonic TADiFAX PHDNE hfD. : 6127299242 Sep. 16 1996 10:10AM P02
0
P�OP4SAL / COlvTRAC'�' �OR �VO�RK�
Mitctir.li I'aintiitg,lifc. � owncr: City af N1ci�dbta Heights .
33U7 Si�elling Avenue S. 1101 Victorea Curve
Miciitcapulis, MN .4S40G � Mciidoia lieights,.MN 5511.8
(G12)729-4220 {GIZ) 452-1850 .
FRx �2�-92az I+sx '452-s9ao . „ ,
I)�te: Scptenii�,er � G, I99G �
Mitchcll Painti�ig, Inc. (''Cotitrxctor") hcreb,y subniits this pl•oposnl to fui•Eiish al! Inboi• Hnd ••
materiai for tl�e project loc�ted at: .. .
11.i11 Victori�t Ctnvc
Menclota I•�'cighis, MN
0
V . ..
1.1 y,�.Q,rk The contract:or shall execute the e,itire work described in this eontracti, except ta the �' .
exte�it specifieally inciicated'in the c�ritract. Work is as follows: ' ,
� . .
V:�rious cx{erior projccts.
Ex7'1'sRIUR WOUD � � '
� Apply Cabot's Waod Bri�htener to all wood surfaccs. Rinse all surfaces with a hibli pressure washer.
Agply ane coat Cabot's Setni-Salid Stain �o al] wood surfaces. � ��
E�'T�RIt)R C`ONCRET� I3LOCK WAI,1. . � � . ' •
Pressure wash ati surfxces to remove laose paint anit dirt. Prime metal brackets of ext�a.ust pipe wirh�rust
inhibitive meta! primer. AI�J�Iy onc: coat Sh�n�vin Williams A-1 QO �1�lat to all concreee surfaces,
Gl►'TF.R.IOR FERRUiI�' 11�ETAJ. � � • •
I•land or powcr tool clean al1 metal surfaces to removc loose z•usc and paint. Spot prime all �hare and rusti�ig
mctal with Sherwin Williams. FCem Kroniik Primer. Apply one coat Sherwin Willianis Tndustrial Enamel to
match existing colar. Stain w�od �trim on railinb. Ail paii�t products applied to mam�facturers
recommended specifications anci dry fiim thickness. � '
�S'URFA.C��S` 'lU 13F. COATF.IJ
. 1. wood facia •
2, wood so�its .
3. rcdwoad trim board
4. ext�rior concretc blaek w�ll in service arca
S. deck raiiin�, base, plate and wacui trim
6. stcel brick suppart anglcs u�ider dcck
7. aar ezhaust ar intake vents
8. all meta! Uollards �
9. me1a1 dooi�s �nd fram�s � �
l0. overhead doors and fr�.mes
FRtDM : P�nasoni c iADiFAX PHC}NE N0, : 6127299242 � �'Sep, 16 1996 10:11AM P03
' �
2.1� p,,,�,t� Th� execution date of this agi•eetnent sha11 be tl�c d�te as f rst writtcn a6ove. The �
approxim�te dafie of commenc�ment af`work sliall be: S}�rin� 1997 � �
. , • � 1+�'��,1' � , �
3.1 Y�ys.�tnt�ut Gontractar propases to com��lefic the above descrita�d work fnr ihe sum of .� '
thou�and r�ne htimdre� fj,$v (� SQ�QQ) Dollars, p�.yable per lcrms �f A�Yicle S of this c���traet, suvject fa
�any written chatt�e orders andlar cnsts arising from ch�nged or difl'ecing sitc cottciitions which were nat •
,. disclosed ar discoVerable upoR� suhmission of t.hi� }�i-c��osa! or cxecution c�f tl�is contract. Additiona] costs
shatl be'suhject to written clian�e c�rders as set foreh ;n ii�is contrnct. � �
3.2 Aitcrnativc �nvr.stsne�zt: Power iool sanci �e�3erator exh�ust pi�e to remave loose rusi. A�ply two
coats Sher�win Wiliiams Kem Hi-Temp 1Ieat Resistant. Cr�atin�,. '1�.bu.nc�re.���.��gQ;,�.S��. d�llars.
4.1 L�c��t�r,l�'.�iths��a�l Uwners autht�rized represcntative si�natiyre c�n�tliis Coz�tract shall be
, .
consi�iered an accept'�nce. af thc ienns af this cflntract. Ttiis Gontract shall be withdrawn, and rendered
nu�l and void, if nt�t acccpted wiihin � ciapS f�rc�m 1'hc date ai`tl�is Cpi�iract.
77io o�v��u and the eonlmctor agir.r ac sci !'arth t+c1oK:
A3tfIL"i.I+ S��pj.�,e�icsltilC S,1 'i'Ix U�t7tir.t� sEWIt tnnka pCoFracr t�aynient� an arcauttit of th: t:na»ract Su�» to titc (:an:ro�ticrr u pmvidcd 2�cfocv.
. ?�Se Uteo upen commcnccmcnt of wark. • . .
' Qjp ihtc upan aularientint C:cnns�lati�an af Wnrk. i.r. ��mci� ti�t. '
?S�% 7'he u�tira tmpaid Uatnncc af thc t:antract upc+n carnplcaiar�, rxy�ttiia nci 30 ctxy:: fre»i dota of invcN4r.
5.2 Aary 1'nymnu duc a»d,rer�ucsted f�r Poymc�n by Ihc C:vntr:�clnr xha11 ixgin a:•cn�inP inscreFt at a r.�tc of Ca,�c and CMro-Hnlf l'ercent (1 1/Z°6) per mnnih ai
• she unpaid bataace. �Upon ihr faitu� ofp�+ncr24 pay L'ontrn�tnr pm+e�pt�v t..natrer.tor �f�aN hx�ro the ri�l�t to}1ay> >vnrk unda ihe C�mVart unei! �on2retl paynfoncc
duc a�vi»g are risaeiveci. • . . . .
�5.3 in tlie event tl►e (:ontrecial' iR rcquircd lo commenec liligatirn� to coflact qx �aipnid 7m�unt duc tu�dr.r �hc rt:cmtrnr•1, ihe U��rocr RhaS1 pty to lhe (:onannor
tcacon�blo nttotiia}h fcas t+ud oaurt cot�tr in rccavcrin� unnnid �nxxait. • ' • •
ARTIGLE 6�',�,ngc Orden G.1 "I7k U�vncr mny atdor changcs in Iha 1Vork dcscritwd nt+o�M, rnnsisling of ttcldilipt�s, Jelctiuns c�r nlodiGeations. 17tc
Canutsct tum �usd Coniract Timt tivili bt xdjurt�i aecat+dtn�ty. S►tch ciia��gc� in !hc Wotk xh�lt he authadzcA in writing by � Changc thdcr d�catmcttt preparcd hy
t}ic Cantreetor and eigncd by iha Owiior aad Conttac�or or hy iiiait atnit�rixeci rcprc�civali4cc Ftatcd iu ttM eiocnmen�
6.2 'i'he Changa Ordcr docurnam shall ctatr. (!) �he dcsaiption af il�c cfixnge ra�ucsted; (2) QK dollxt chnr�cd to a�mplete thc clisngc trcquacted; snd (3� thc
shtait of itta adjuatment 'tn the Cantraei i'sate, if any. . •
6.3 Yaymem. afCiunge Urdax are dua in fui! upon nu�Uorix.�t;rn� nfU►e fiiu�i pm�mcnt. Ci�an�.cn resuithsg in thc rctum oPn,a�rriRTs; U.vper i: rcrc�xmxihlc for
wny �eRtocking altergc. . . , .
AR1'ICLB 7,�j�t 9.1 7t�c Otvner n�,rccr to c�cry firc, iornadc� end othcr nccescxq• i��uranee rclntin� tc+ thc 1Vcsrlc perfnim�d t�nder this Cantt++c�, •
CnntracCar ageoa to earry p��Ylic liebility incurance far clxinls aMicb mey nrixc ota of Cantra�l,ur'c operation unckr t8ic C:�rriract.
A.k'PiCLR R;,;Rrr ,�GjL4tt of l�nrk $,� `I'I�c C;ontraciar �i�ni! �ntxtqNly cc�mcct ll'm�t: rcjcctcd by ttx Oc�nrr oi 1'silin,� ta tcsr�fixsn k� roquircmcntx of tSk
CantrAct or e�ifianti�n,e for R pariod eCltS'O (i} )"C�/p If�Ntt lI1C 1G0.10 OrxUI1SIA11lIH) Cvql#fltl IM1 Or �V(ryjC rC1iM'I111XI UIItIr,�' 1I11R CAt11fRCl. f'NIIII(C lP CtYfl�I)• M�i11t
Articia 51'�ymcttt Stludu3o wlti void all ivarruxtics. M}' �racrarsiicfi arc ��hjai Eo tiw cartq+ticmx, i(ausy.lis�cd brlau. t:t'��Tt2AG7t?R A�tAKi�.S I�tfl OTHl:K
1VARItANTIES� K,XPRLSS U1t IMP1.iF:U. G.'Y'i�"t'R�C1'()ii SI1Aid, i�U'!' IZt: I,T�IIi,t: Hc)K AivY Irt.tni:�TAi, nit 4`c)NSIiQ[I[;N'i`1�I.
DAMACIiS Ok O�VNI�l2. ' ' '
N! CI�.L�L PAINTING, iNC.
I3 �� /��— I�atc: `��G�.�r
Contractor's Autl�Qri�ed Represeuta�.ive.
Dennis Menke � �
l�ate:
{}wner`s Ai�Choeixed Jtepresentatxve
.M
�,.. � �
srae�
,�•��'�� �
P.Q. BOX 180 • I.ONG LAKE, MN $535$
OFFlCE: 6t2-475-1223 * FAX: 652-475•290'f
8t0 SUBMlTTEL1 TQ� I DAT$;
cx�t oF rs�avnoTA t�rGKrs
11Q1 Victoria Curve
J[19 FlAM�;
Q7`iiEET.
September 13, 1986
E'XTERIOR PAINTZNG
at'�r: � GtY: � a1x; '
M�rtdota Hei�hts
���;
CONLACT, TEL.EAHONE:
W� h�roby �aubmit specit(catione and estimat�� to� th4 (O!lOWlltj�:
STEWARD CORPORA.TION WTLL:
2. PreparG �urtacee �na per tne specification sheet.
2. Appiy coa�ings as specified in the epeclfication sheet.
I,ABC?R AND MATERIALS = � 597Q.00
�_��=_�_
1M� i+ftsb�r prapoa ta fium4h GNsor wnd mai�tirtt — Compiaol M�ocor0�no� rrlth th� ab�O,Mt aptdtkatlod�, tQc tM Wm ef:
Fitt�,_„�„ nfne hund=ed seventY it0l00 aou.n tt �970.8t3 a ww► �s��e �0 5« �ae. u buo+�:
.. � #L 13.L1prtZR'�n �
Ari woelc ta 0� aamptst«i tn � woetcm�►ttb mtnawr �taptdtnp to sundard pncttat. Any �tutntton ot diM�tlpn 1rom �Oo+� aprNHo�l(crt� lmolWrtp
.� eous� w�n o..�ucsa o+,�r �r�ot►.��a.n o�e.�, .r►a �ai b.�,..n.xt�. �t�ro. a.r ana.�. �n. au�at.. �N w�.�u oom��a.nt
upos+ atrilo�s, �ao#dtna o[ d�l�ys b�Yotsd ou� aoMrol. Qsatar to p�y dt ez�+�*as an6 itnanos oMrq tncurnd M aWt.cttan a� this ati,
rr • �'s�G —
�tan: tr�w �po.ai m.�r a�nncue�.n oy us n noi acc.pc.e ,�r�n,�� �thy ucera Praject Estimato= 30 �
/bcept+�nca of Prcpoaa!
TA� ttriwt pdcu. �Pacl(lcatfona an6 eondittonr ars satbt�aory �ntl arc h�r�oy accepttG.l4u tto tltthar{=a0 Eo do tt►b s+ork as apedfl+�d. PaymMt wNi b�
mad� u oucllasd abow.
a1nWD{�E:
&tpn��(�
, f
0412311992 09:23 612-454-4996
R& R Cle��+ & Sea� i�c.
2Q7'8 Cttunty Rd. 30
����r ilfii� 55 t�G�G
(s12j a54-4s9B
�
Name ��7� i�' !l���•�,ali�? ��Ls
Street %�O/ � �/� �'�',�/? �t �? v e�
Cicy �"����' fq, �r5 6 .t'll�'' Scace %Wh
Pnone �b � ' /l''b'CJ Fi�� ya�.2 - f�951,rr'
MN EQPT R R G�EANIIVG
, - • • � ��
..
�'�� e
Street
Cicy
�i .
No. e'.���Z,../ \....�
Dsce..�-.t.G.'�,1.-
stsaet �ta. ..j..,�....,�. .
Datc af Ptans ��� Arch�tect
Sce�;e
We hereby pr��n ,a r.r• �.,�s,r=.;fi> >: ��- .r�aLe�lals and perf�rm .the �abor necessat�y far tho comples�an of
1��ca,�-� �!/ �dod �� ��,�. � s. ��/1"'C5/ %4/� �'?[ dr4/A��/' ltI',//�M/���-iJ„QjZ, f d"�. a� /2.�v.c G
�'t✓ay�1 ,r..il� hof- r.vt�r►�c t,�.-�.1ea• �,.y,�stu�t�. ST'B,�i�,r t�il•C C?.br�fr .
,''�� �i+./ - lra�i Li— S.Y.irsv � ri,r R S1o. td' s�j►r� .,('�tL�r��' �iRr� "%�8 7if 81� � .
�l �a,h, a� d p�..s, t�� S��-�c/ a��a s��of� �r �ss s�.0 d�'r��.�� c•.c i 7-` ga�es .
/q`LO h� d'7�� 1 7�r� a r�,w i i4r�.,�r �"'ti �6�7c�¢I9+�'� S/^S�r ��G B c' .c/kt. �,�' ��C 7� r%r ,, v��/ .
�
%"�cVw IF"` Sri�e� / t�e�c� �; �.x /�/.w5 t�/i�.�ii /�ts yr �pr►/�y�a Gr�s�' �rt.tc�sar " GD ✓ e� 4r�7L c�/l
'��s� e��,��I �•• m,�f��►,� srw•y �a��'"��,, d.ho�..d �ock j�1z� sT�� /
P Mi � �G`k�r�►i a T,.� !��"�..� f«�+ e��d � - ,j�/,� �ie�.d�f �"' � a 4�. rC � s ��j:� �►zG 1�fj �p/� r'' �
�� «- �,c�.+� tv, f P. +�.�t•� �r+1•+►G�+ ��t r8 �ae �a i1�' 4,,, y' /� �. /s.�lrr �o �,,�
�, f� �, i l'1� .r ��f�th /�G3� S'T��',�,� �i 5�,,� o�"��!�Cr�wr�r Wi1l.rsr�s lvs�7jf tt �' t� '
I Q��,,;�, �ils��on A,�,a•-�,� �3r�.`=
� ��1,• �i,�,� .� �'u� b��k �al� ��x .�� �y �� A�.�o � pds � �. �,,� �
�j nP �;,� f,,C, a.lo� -t o�� �.. � oa
��J T�r�/ � ��, �.
All ttlatertir3l i5 gUer�r,Cga?d r,u C�e �s specified, and the above work te be performed i� ec�rdar5ce � the drawings and
speCtfcBLi��ns subr*y:tCe�i fcr� above w�rk and completed in s Substart�4� t woricment% martner for Lhe s�m of
�. �+��"�"'"'L' DoUars [$ 1.
wiLh Rayrnar+ts to be macic �s Fcltows: ' �,�' jQ'
Any alcerac'ron or �avi8c�an fnsm .�brsv�s acecy��cat�o++s tm�alrk+p e�cua
costs, vrA� �e e7teCUCM Gnty �tpOn Nrr.,te� t+rCse�s. tnd wdi becom� an
e�cLro Cha�'p� �Vtr' and aqO�G t.hC �sL�mnr,� �Li aqresmenss e�lnpanc
upo� stHEas. ucc�de�xg ar OF�4`9y3'vhY4�M Ot.� cOnCrol. Owns+'to Gecty
f�. tornado �nd aher neces::err �:r,.c�-�ua;.� aaFron abovt wack W�k-
men't Compensaucm ar�d p,ih i�; I, rr SCl�' . .� .�tx7�r M it1dv16 M�O�C CO b8
caken aut by
j!f r � ��� �4 �.-c.c✓C y�..0
fi�Sp2Gtfutiy SubmitCed ��"(/ /"� G�G
p�C � h Q .7
Nate-This praposai may be wlthcirawn �y us if not accepced
withia.�"''� days.
. AGCEPTANCE OF PROPQSAL
The above �rices. �pr�:�f�ca� •+,n�; �,� . �;,r�nd�t+ans ere SatisfacGory and are hereby accep.ed. You are authorized ta do che ri�ork as sp;;c�fied.
Payment w II be ma:is� ��:; c� :s,1t==t:,1=,:,bove.
Signatu�e
Oete Signacure
�� -.
Hire The Pairrting & Decorating Pros � �
�pC��� �`
pain� _ .
���o .
�
880 No. Hamltne Avenue Saint Paul, Mtnnesota 55t04
Five.St_ at�_p�ea phane:642-9515
PROPOSAL & . F�: sa2- sssx
COHTRACT `�o�' # , g� oate P- � �
13-Se
. Source REF
�'Q MENDOTA FiTS CITY HALL
� GUY KULDENDER dob stte SAME
'� 1141 VICTt?RIA CURVE Oescrip. EXTERZOR TRIM, DECKS
cfs/z MENDUTA HTS MN 55118 pescrip. AND DOORS
� � 452-1850 , Co�tact �UY/452-1850
�}°� 2 STEVE LOW.ARY
Estimata�
- .:. .. .:
.... ;. . .. . . .
.:•.: ..,......:. ,.>:� ::..... ::... ...::.. . .. :;: . .:. .. .. .:;:>. . . ....:; .. . .
•:: . :. ::. ;,, .. :.:.: .: .. ....: .
•. . . . . . .,; : . . . .. ..:. ...... . _.
::. ..
. : .. ;
�::: .:QT�" :.::U;..�T.:;:-":::�TT`.�M,;:-�'`s:D��CRIP�:T01� :.::. ; CC3ATS;::�'INISIi.:. ::..@ ::; '. �;:_:: �:� :.� � :�:�::�Ti?2'A% ; :'..;.
... . :......... .:: . .,.. :. :, � ... . .. $: ... . .. /;.
•:::::: .. :, ; . ..
.;..: . .::.: ::: ;:�.,
..,.,<.:::., .:..:. :.<.
..:: .. : .. :
;:... :;,
, :;;.:<
:, .: .. <.:::..:.-..,:;;... ..;;
,, ;: . .
: . �,
' , :"<: .. .
'�' �:.5_i'� : T;��T:;:�!''� .:4;"::;::.SOF�'TT� ..::;. ::� .. .. ..::: .:::::: ' ::.>..:.�::� �<.�';' _ . s: :5.:00 .. :;:_: :'>:� 2�:�:5.?5:.`�?fl,:� ..
�.: ... ._ :..
.. .. . �.__..., ,. ..: �;: �.<.:, ..: :. .�''�-.: .::� :.:. .:.:..:. .:�::::.,. .:.._ :
- _.. -. . . . . . .. . . .. . .. . : .:. . . .. .... ..
.. _ _ . .... . ::. .:: .
. . , . .. ... : . .: ...
:�,.;:�:�::�>:���::: ^ _. .::::::.::.: ` _
� . . :;. �-�-:�r�fi��,�,��oo�s:=��: s�z��� ��+; FR��:�.:::;' �::.�.:>:::a:.: $ : ,��:a:. o�...�,:::... : : :::�:::- �.:�:�:�:�� ��':�
:: : .... .
��:�:� :�:�.::; �'� ..5�,1 W�T1E S+l��`.�',I'� AR�A ': :��: ..: : `:' .: '.�:.:�::.... � ���° 1. ;A. . ,.�,r 30 . 0i� / �_ .:.. .$42U:�:�1;0.:: :: �'
� ...... ..
;:;::.::--_.::: .��.lD �.:Ix�;I+�,:.�''.i' M�2'A�:;��DEGK;:.RA.I�iINGfB�1'�E=: . 1 ;B: ' �:>:::::i:::-:��::::��:. 4;,i}{�=::,`:- ::::s>:= :<::.:�:.::>::� 't3:Q. ,..:_.:
:..... :.. . .. . . . : ...: :..:.: .:,... .. � ... . . � .. �.. ......�0>-:� .
. .
:::���.' '':;,s;; $ :�'�F�Kx�iG SQ��R�(s :' :::';. .: °::':' ;..
:;:;: :::.:::�:;.::a;` .; .... �
.: —. :
;r... . .';:�..:::'�r'..:� ..;.i ;�.tir'<.:- .. ,....,..:�- .... .:;fi'�� .
: :
:, ::.-�4°;;�0'< /;.:�: . ��:.: :$:��.:�;�DO.
,�;:::.:.::;._;::.2..:::�:>:,::.:.:.::�5 :.4 �;.::VE�TS.::... : ;.:_ .::�. ��.;:::::<.;..;;,:��';>:B� - -:::,..:_;...' . : :.;.;: �.::: :���:.�_:..:-:::;,.> ..;. : �.::::: �..:::.:
.. _. .
. :... :::: . :..::�:::�:: ..:�-»:>:. >::...::-,;::.:$35.�.c�t}.;..f..,. , ,..;::.:�.$��:.:�Q:..: �
�_:;:.���:::;.�:::;':�_ ::;:>:.:�:::::: �:.::. �<..;:_:_: ::::>.: _ :.:. >.:::;: :::. . -:::::.:::. .::;.� .. ..... .::....... :..:..:..;::. .. : . .:.
, . .. ,
�:�;:.. :�. :;�� `�:'r:::`�v�i��' ...: «.. ; : . .
:, . :.;.;..,�:�..,$ : ::,.. �����.,c�o'~�:�:.;�:= .� ::,:..:��:�`.:�,�;..._:
>: .. . <:..
�::>.. ...... . . .
; < ::
.:, :.
. ::�:;:::.':<:::�`� :�':�:::::>*:::::;i�i �.��:;::: u�i��::.: .:,.. � : .. ... . ..:::::.: :::::: ...: a:_::s�:. ._ .....� �:: z�:�:a:.v.: :.—.�. :;::;.: . � .��.:�o : �
::.:. ......:::. .:.:.. .
,:.:.>::� .: : ::..� ::.:....::..::::.:...:...:... ,
.. : .. :. :::::: : : .. ::.:...:.;:::: :::= �::::;
.. .: .::. : .
::�.:= <�:'::::::�.� °I�.i�b.��.:: ,.. �:,�i�':��Z�AD �;2::: :CAR �:'� : .:::...::: ..::::::::<:::�:: �:B. ::: :,;:> .�. �_, ;. 5.:.:t�- ::.< : ;.:.:=- ;:::<.:::�:. .. :..:>�>: :
:: . . .:., ;.;. :.. ,. . : ;�:.4.: :.:: :>:: �. .J..;, . ,. ,. . � 45 ;..:� �;. : .
.... .... . �..�: ;.
.. :: :.... .. .. .. :�. ,:
.::;�:,. .:. .;?.;,:�:.:�?:(3.OR>:.::.::_ .(�Sl'r�ItH�AI� ��.:: GAI�:. .:. ��... ''�� �':;::�.1.':I3..� :;��;: :� �5�:c'0:0> ;.;:::.� �._",':: � �5:.:{i �'
:.
.... .::. . ...... ...:. .: ... ...:. . . . � :.. :..::;.c::::.:..� $_�.: �;.;,,,�?
.... .
. .. .... . .
:. ..:.:. ...::. .� .: �FtQW�#.2WA�_�IY�TLiO�}.. B£t:IGH�EN�R.,. .;.:' .:::.:::.:::`" .;;.. :`: .: ..: .. :. ::.::::. �'�`{� _� � Q;.... ..�::.- �>:_ ;,.:.;:::;: .� : < : :�:;: : : :;:;:°:;
. : . .. . ,.:. :.>..:. :;; ; . ; : . ,: ; .. .. $ ::. :::.:.:.�.::::� - .::.. .�,:.SQ....�3{�::- ..r
;.; .. ... :•.>:.:,.:: • : .. .. : � . � . .
,:: .:.::: •.:::
::.. ..: ., ..:.: . : .:..:.: ... . .:. . ::;: .� . � .. .... �:.;�.,.. :�:: .. ., :.
�. : .,:: .:. ;;,;: : •: ;.:
� .: . ,..:. :. ::., :..<. .:. •:: � .
: ....:. :. .... . : ..
�,.:.
`:FR`�GE _;TN'CY:UDES;:��'X:�i?i�:'LASOR, .2�TE�.3A�"�'.s.,._ �:':�'i`�:X�S AND:.:Z����3;NC'E:..:�;;::I�'�:`:��;1A�,'i5:::�I't�:=:::`:
., . . . .:. ..
... .... .....:.
:�BE`:'�`OP ����'„1iTA�,�TY ����t,intZN::;���r�IAi+�!'S PR0�3��'.�!.5:.`:�15 'SP`EE':II``�BL.+".�t�QYM1i4..,.�"... ; . . �
, . . . ....... ;. .
....:_ ..... .....:.............:....: �.... : :. ..::::-. -:...: .. .
: .......:.::.......::: :::.....:.: �::;:>::><..�.::;�.:_:.:::.�.
. .� :..: .. �;;:-. ��:::.:::;: =.:-� ..
,. :.
.
� _.: .. ;.<�>: �.;::.::::�.:::::: ;:�:_: : .... .....::.:, : . . -:....:..� .:. �.: �-: .�:.
' � ��is oiar
A CABOT'S SEMI-SOLID ALKYD $3,981.Q0 ,
g S, WILLIAMS .ALKYD ENAMEL G�nd Total -> ,
C
D
E DOWNPAYMENT: $1,330.00
F
. ....... .... .: ...:......:. ..
. .,. :. ....: .,:.:
...
t;;::, , ::. .
.. . . .,. ,:. .
> .. :.::
. .. ,. �. ,; .
,. ,
�:.:. . ..� ::: . _:: ...:: < ��:�. ._ .:�:::��..,..... . .... . .. ... .: .. .::.:...: . . .. . . ..:.. . . ...: . : .. . . :::::: .
...
-:..�NQ: MATER°Z�.L:S: �.T'Q..:BE >>�i�P.L3Ei} �II+i :.A,i}U�RS�.:i�P:``:�{ON�3:���Q�T�;��::;:�:�.:.::::::�::�=: .. .-.:;:�: . ::=: �::.:.<. ..`. ..
.� ..: .: :..:.:..:.: . : �:� .:. :.,.::.:..: ;...:.: .... ..: �: .:.. ..... ...;:.;;: . - ,.., _..,,_ :,:: .. .. . ,. ,,
: .-: .,. ,•. ..
, ... . .. .. :..::... ..�:.. ..
.
.;,::'>pR;T�E:�'s;'�%NC�;UD.�;�. :G�EA3�,:' :SCRAP.�;;< W�R�'. :�:R;USH; :�PR�M.�:'.;:;..W. f��k:Q�'`E�L.. �PRINIER;�. : .
..
. ..:.,: .. .... .. : : . ..:. . ,. .,. , .:; ,
.. , .
..., �
::..:: :�A.LT��C..:�{}U'�:�::;:;i�P�NS"N?GS .&.; .SiD��.C.3�`i'i�,�M �7Cl��T`�t'�'_ AS.:..I�IEE�►.�.+'�'3:r�;<FI�,�S.H:,. :::::: ;::::::...:::�:::::.. ;:<:
.. . :..
'�;>>S��`�`S`�s' ��IiV`�SH ,.�OA'�.`;� '��J' B� ,�f;P�'�+ZEI7 SX:>;�i�itLESS;::':��RA,Y.r...���T1��1�TC'{.�.';:��',,::" .,�:: :'..:.' :-.
. .:... .... : . . .... . :.. .. . ..: . .. . ..:; ..
: . . .. .: . .
..�:�::.:.5�'�:'LR���� ...:N.�ORE:�.L?�I:��'Ql�: .F.��x.��..H....InT�.*.��H*:�::�:;::�3R"Y�= P��.'�:. +��..1�:P�'��:..1.5....�`I�S .:�Q '5... :,
,... �.::-:.:.,,;. ...:::::.::.:.....:::.�:::.:..:...:..:.�::..:....... ;;::., ,...... ; ._�:::.;,: _::,::.,:.�: ..._.:.:::,:-:..�,.:.. ,:::.;<:.:,. ...:- .--::,:.::,:.:.::......:::....:.::..........., ......::....:..:..;�:.�''..:: :.�.:..- .:
.... .. ... . . ..: .:
�� ::��>3��+ ' Nf�:�:'ER� � �`I;�: �'Q ' �: .�iPP�;�E`b:'� ���T�:=:��R.i�:`��:.`�CCt4RI��T�E':;::�:Z;'�' . `_'_.. ., . . _. .. � _ :. _., :j: .;: >:=.�.
::..: :::..:.::� .: ::...:::::.,.:�:�.��.., : ; ..: -:..: ..�3.. . _ I�I. �?iANt3�`A . �Sl�2E� .
.. :: .. < ; . . .,:.. . . ,. , .. . ...... .: . ::..., . : . :: :.. . :; ,.. ;:: ;: ....:...: ,;...... ,: : ..:... ..... .,: , ,.. ....
;. _.;:.:; ; :;....: :> :... .. .,: . . : i��::..,'::.;:...:.:;: C�:�;:..::::�.>: >;,:,.:::1.;.., _;';:'.::... ;:; .. ::> ::.
.....; S�E���'.���i'.��Q�� R:� .�`,,,�. R17� �IxR�'.A ..: �R��'�.'��Q�.:.�1D .. C9�:�2I�fiG:.:A�?�LI�CA�:TON.,
;:;:,;::::��'C}�3 �:� �4 : B :':;:T�E�. :NE � :.:A.i�T�:::::� ��<`:=::�3; :::T�E�.:=�`.,N <.::�:4.�' :: � . �i�:'_. , . � . .
�:......: ,.:.::.�..:::.:;;.: .:,. .:.:U,.:.:::. :.E��..;.::.�'i�i�K.:.:�?�1��,:';:'..,:.,..:,;.::'� `�;;
. . .:. ..: .:: .:......:..:: `�'�, ,. :.,:.: -. : �..:>: .: :::::::.;;.:.. . .: , :, I�.<:... �;:.::> :: :,. :<<,;,.:..., :.: . . ... ....... :....... . : :... .. ... .:...: - .. :..:,.: :::.:......,..: ....� ..:... : : ::.
..::. :
� .:'°>�r�;�'�; EDGE� 1��D;:: �7pli�''�.S �.ES.ETW��N:;;`.�UR�`.Afi�' �. � .�O . BE� '�LEAI�; .��►: ::��iRP�:. :: � .. ` �
....::::::. _.. :.::..,:......: :< :.:::.: .... .::::........:::: :. ....:::::..:..,. :.. :........ ...: ::;�:;:,........ . .,. .. ..
:
. .. :..:. . . , :... r.. .::.:,::,;: :
:: ::,..:::,_,..;:<.:..::<:::, ::..:.:.::::::. .:.::..:.::...
�ent agrees ta terms an r,on rUpns o is contract proposa ,
on both hont and reverse sides.
,� �'l-`'lG"
FRESH P1#1NT INC date Ci�ENT da#e
�
! � 'Sr
�
M�� �il' ��� • : ,�1:� *-
--�,
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Ad�tor
FROM: Guy Kullander, City Ha11 Building Manager
SUBJECT: P�teriox Stain and Paint Repai7rs on City Offices
DISCUSSI4N:
City offices were constructed in summer and fall of 1988, and the exterior st.ain and
paint surfaces require routine mai�tenanee. Attached is a description of the work required,
original materials specified far the building and a recommendation from Cobat Stain, Inc. on
how to clean the tannen that is staining the soffits.
Fund.
Funding far this maintenance would come from the City Fl[all Buiiding I�Zaintenance
Estimate af praject costs are $4,Q00 to $6,OQ0.
r��N�;i�� i � ��� r
Bid results will be available on Tuesday evening.
�. �
V �
� C it o�
Y
. � ., j endota Heights
THE CITY IS SEEKING PROPOSALS FROM PAINTING CONTRACTORS FOR THE
REPAINTING AND/OR FINISHING OF THE FOLLOWIIVG ITEMS AT THE CITY
OFFICES LOCATED AT 1101 VICTORIA CURVE.
1. ESTERIOR WOOD
a. Clean, wash, and stain fascia
b. Clean, wash, and stain soffits(roughsawn cedar plywood)
c. Clean, wash, and stain redwood trim board
Note: stain color to match existing. Original stain used
was Cabot Semi-solid stain
2. EXTERIOR CONCRETE BLOCK WALL IN SERVICE AREA (East end)
a. Clean or brush surface remove dirt, existing paint, and
other foreign matter. Repaint interior surface. Color to
match existing. .
b. Prime metal brackets for exhaust pipe on south wall.
3. EXTERIOR FERROUS METAL
a. Steel deck railing and base plate. Also necessary to
stain wood trim on railing.
b. Steel brick support angles under deck.
c. Air exhaust or intake vents/louvers: 1-4'x1'4", 1-6'x3'4",
2-4'x5'4". �
d. All metal bollards 6-Service Area and 2 by Police Garage
�. Metal frames and doors, both exterior and interior, for
exit doors-4 total, one each side of building. Does not
include main entry doors.
f. Metal frames and overhead doors in Police Garage for two
overhead doors. 1-10'4" W x 8' H, 1- 22'4" W x 8' H
Paint exterior of door only.
Note: Clean all metal surfaces before painting.
Remove rust as necessary and spot prime. �
Paint color to match existing.
As a standard of quality the following products are
recommended: Pratt & Lambert, Pittsburgh, Devoe,
Sherman Williams, Cook, or Glidden.
BID PROPOSALS MUST BE RECEIVED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 16, 1996
by 12:00 O CLOCK, NOON. �
SUCCUSSFUL LOW BIDDER MUST SHOW PROOF OF INSURANCE.
SEND BID$ TO GUY KULLANDER AT CITY OFFICES
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Vlendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 : 452 • 1850
�
i��.`3.ti `� r.-st:y e r�i.� ..S � }�.nt'.:'i}:.�%;�?�.f'' ���fJ'_?„;,
PE�y51 Y» C.•i!if ..
� ~—��..�`�'i
� • f 1 .. �
:'�� �!
'A�,Cri:.r.a:.
• i � �
Patrick A. McCarEhy
Sales Regresentative
I8i35 Emeraid Trai!
Farmington, Minnesota 55024
(bi 2)46t1-6074
nuel Gabot Inc.
Mr. Guy Kullander �
City of Mendota Heights
1Z01 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN. 5511$ ,��:
Dear Guy,
I am writing you as a foTlow up to my visit of last Friday.
As we had discussed during my inspection, the soffits af
the city ha12 have been stained by tannalc acid. Tanni,c acid
bleed, also known as extractive bleed, is directly reiated
to moisture. Water enters the wood �haraugh precipi�atian or
candensa�ian, dissolves the natural3.y occurrir:g tannins,
migrates to the surface and degosits the tannins. Evidently,
the excess moisture that �aused the bleeding was due ta new
construc�ian. While future bleeding is possible, I do not
believe you will have any significant experience with it.
To solve the existing discolaration I recommend cleaning
the soffzts and facia by applying Cabot's Wood.,Brightener
according to the instructians an the product labei,
including all safety information such as protective
clothing, covering shrubs, and testing all areas to be
exposed to the cleaning solution for any negative reaction.
The area should then be rinsed by using a high pressure water
washer at a moderate setting. Once the area i� completely
dry, appl,y one coat of Cabot's Semi-Solid Stain #OI43
(please verify co3orj. Semi-so3id stain provides you with the
natural, nan-gee3.ing properties of a penetrating stain as
well as the greater hiding capabilities of a solid stain.
I have enclosed technical data sheets for the products I
have recommended. If I can be of any further assistance
please do not hesi�ate ta contact me.
Sin�r ly,
� .._----__...
Pat M Car y
Cabot Stains
c: Pau3 Ragozzina
enc.
' lUQ F-ia�e Street
Newburypart, Massachusetts 01950
(508)465-I90Q Fax: (508klb2-0511
�i
SECTI4N 09900
FTNISH PAINTING
Page�/! 4 ,
F. All woad to be stained ar �d sha21 be
lightly san �•rallel to the '. Material not
� back primed in sha ack primed on the job
prior to installation. nails shall be set and the
nail holes fillr�fille���ed to match finish
after the f aat has been app77. ats, pitch
n
strea sappy spots;'if a2l.owed, sha ouched
u r to pri.ming with sealer or she33ac.
-UP: �
A. painting subcantra �� protect his wark
as well 11 adjac �/A�of others from paint
splattering. mpietion of finishing wark, all
paint, e e removed from gl�ss, finish
floo nd other s aes where�spotting has occurred.
and runs shall be ed and repainted.
3.3 PAINfi APPZ,ICATIt�N SCHEDLTLE:
NOTE: P&L indicates Pratt & La�ttbert.
Painting subcantractor shall review drawings for any
special painting patterns. For bidding purposes,
approximately one-third (1/3j of all paint shall be
Deep Tone inaterial..
Exterior and Interior Ferraus Metal �■■r
1 coat P&L Noxide protective coating metal prime
(required only where factory prime is worn or no
factory prime is provided).
2 coats P&L Effecto Ename2 on exterior
2 coats P&L Cellu-Tone an intericr
Exterior Concrete Block
1 coat P&L Primafil 200 .,�
2 coats P&L Vapex house paint
��erior Wood Painted Trim ��
1 coat P&L Permali�e e�erior primer
1 coat P&L Permalize house and trim finish
Exiceriar Stained Wood '(Fascia & SoffitZ
2�coats Cabots semi-transparent stain
;.
1 1 1 � � :1 :
September 12, 1996
To: Mayor and City Cauncil
From: Kevin Batchel.der, City A'� or
Subject: Peace by Pearre Resolution - Building Non Violent Cammunities
Presen#ation by Mr. 7im Backstmm, Dakota Caunty Attorney
Mr. James Backstrom, Dakota County Attorney, has requested aa oppartunity to appear-
an the City Council's agenda to present a Resolution for building non-violent communities.
(Please see propc>sed "Peace by Feace" resolution.)
Octaber af 1996 has been designated as Vialence-Free Minnesota. month and Domestic
Abuse Awareness month, with October 10, 1996 as the nationally recognized Turn CJff the
Violence Day. Mr. Backsbrom is coordinating his efforts with the Dakota Council for Healthy
� Communities.
Qther information attached includes an invitation to a workshop sponsored by the
Dakota Prevention Coalition and the Workplace Action Team tatled $.�is You Can Take -
Buitdin�lYonviolent Wark�►laees.
Acknaw2edge Mr. Backstmm's presentation. If the City Councit desires to adopt the
Peace by Peace resolutian, they should pass a motion to adopt Resolution No. 96-�, A
RFSOLZtTI4N BTJIL�'�ING NON-VIOL,EN'r COMR�'G�NI'riES ... PEA�E BY PEACE.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION BUILDING NON-VIOLENT COMMUNITIES ... PEACE BY PEACE
WHEREAS, we want our homes, schools, faith communities, workplaces,
public areas, and individual communities to be places where all feel safe and live in
peace; and
WHEREAS, violence is actions and words that hurt people; and
WHEREAS, it requires the actions of all to eliminate violence from our lives
and communities; and
WHEREAS, we recognize the interdependence of government, schools,
businesses, faith communities and neighborhoods, and thus believe the best way
to ensure our communities future is by working together; and
WHEREAS, we can ali educate our�elves ar�d our children about healthy
ways to resolve conflicts and to respond to anger; and
WHEREAS, October, 1996 is being designated as Violence-Free Minnesota
month and Domestic Abuse Awareness month, with October 10 as the nationally
recognized Turn Off The Violence Day; and
WHEREAS, the Dakota Council for Healthy Communities invites individuals
and community groups to participate activefy in the BUILDING NON-VIOLENT
COMMUNITIES ... PEACE BY PEACE campaign.
NOW THEREFORE BE /T RESOLVED that we do hereby declare our support
for the 'BUILDING NON-VIOLENT COMMUNITIES ... PEACE BY PEACE" campaign
and pledge to support and sustain violence prevention efforts and work toward
eliminating violence in our community.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17th day of
September, 1996.
CITY COUNCIL ..
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ATTEST:
By
Kathleen M. Swanson Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
� 'Sep, 6.1996 12;lOPM DAkOfiA GO—ATTY No,1391 P, 1/2
OFFICE 4F DAKOTr� COUNTY ATTORNEY
JAMES C. BACKSTROM �
COUN7Y ATTORNEY `' ' - ��
�.,�.
Uakora Count�• JuUic�al C�rne�
- I 3ci0 we5r H�gltway »
la�s�ings. �innes�ra �033-23J3
Ch��Aes �. Dit�mcr, Clii��f Dcp�ay
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
�_ �' �_ -•�
CITY COUNCIL
JIM EACKSTROM
SEPTEMBER 6, 1996
TeIc�E�lk�i�e �r'
lG I 31-4:i�-�F38
F.�X: i�i 1�� s38.a.500 (CrfrTvn�l I���•i�ioit�
R•VC: �G I 314:3S-�.'9 �Olh�r Oi�•isionsf
COVER PAGE PLUS I ADDITIONAL PAGES
COPII�IENTS: Please find attached a copy of the Building
Non-Violent Communities ... Peace By Peace Resol.ution
that he would like your city to adopt.
Thank you.
admin\forma\iaxl
Crlminal Division
Phlllip U. Prako(xt�vj�z
�
Juvonllc aod Family sen ices Di�lsien
lk��aild F. k3nu�c_ Hr�cl
Clvil DivlSfon
i:unen 1. Srlk�(fet. I lctxi
of[icc ytanaKer Vrc�inv Wirr�ss Cc�Ord'u��ux
��� Norma J. Zat�l . PacriCia Ro�tken
. :::t:::$.:� ::;;
::<;.:...;..::::.::. . . . . . .
. •.j�..':�•:�•
...... "�'�� ' .
..:. ...
. . �,% •
�
. .:.. :. .. . ...
,�.� ..;
..: . . : ..: :
v: •..:...i�:0i: i:2.: iie i. � . .. .
:..,.:
..... ,.: �::
... ,
. �:: .r,:
::. [::;�.;: •' .::..>:� ::::•:•x•.:a.y: �' . n :.:. . i::, : :� . ::;:; .
'• ' .:.
... •. .
::
. ::... .., : ......:,, . :s.. .::.: ::.}.
.
.:.:. �.c °;::
� ... .:: � ..... . . . ..., . .,
�': ' .v. .,.L._•..:2�-�.. �.;..� '. '...:"::.. ��Ii•:::.:i::.. •.�:''�.�•:•�: ••ls.�y'��
.:.. v: {.: ..:. : � � :` : . • ..'. �. � �,h:�� '.. .
::::;: �� tt-ion:'�.: .:::;��:q:
:: . ......
.. .
.::.... :... �lako�a�. Pr. e:x�nt�cor�::�'�oa�
;:::;::;::�::::$.�.::�:::�: �
. ... ....
.. :.::.. ..:: . .
.:... . ...: �
...
.:;
,.. ..,...... �:::.v...:::..:::...:�...: :::..::. ::..z.:.
... .... . � :�f:� . �:�: . ... _ .. .
September 3, 1996
Dear Businesses in Dakota County:
You aze invited to participate in Steas You Can Take - BuiIding Nonviolent
Workplaces a workshop sponsored by the Dakota Prevention Coalition and The
Woricplace Action Team of the Initiative for volence-Free Families and Communities in
Ramsey County. �
Dakota County is comautted to providing a safe environment for its residents and for its
workers. Does your place of employment have a policy providing a violence-free
workplace? Are there resources available to help if employees have a question about their
safety or feel threatened on the job? Do you have a procedure to follow if workers
experience harassment, threats or intimidation?
The Dakota Prevention Coalition can help you overcome your fears and gain the �
irnowledge you need to address these important business issues. Often businesses feel that
they do not have the resources to address all these issues as adequately as they would like.
For this reason, training and support aze being made available to your business.
The Dakota Prevention Coalition, a group of citizens and business volunteers, in
cooperation with the Initiative For volence-Free Families and Communities in Ramsey
County, is offering you the opportunity to attend a free workshop that will address these
issues. �
The training will be held on Thursday, October 17, 1996 and Thursdav, November 21,
1996 (same workshop offered on two different dates) at the Western Service Center,
14955 Galaxie Avenue, Apple Valley. .
If interested, please mail or fax your registration form to Mary Janish at the Dakota
Prevention Coalition, 161 North Concord Exchange, Suite 450, South St. Paul, MN
55075, or fax to 552-3130 by October 15th or November 19th.
161 No. Concord Exchange, Suite 450, South St. Paul, MN 55075 Telephone: 612/552-3158 FaY: 612/552-3130
.-
�'�'��
. ,
;{
��9� !.
,.J ..,� f: y
�••y �
� _-_ =_:
At this � workshop, you will make connections v.7th people and arganizations wha are
interestec, dad/or involved in aeadng viplence-free warkplaces. The Wqrkplace Action
Team, of'Fhe Initiative farVialence-Free Families and Ca�nmunities in Ramsey County,
represents zhe following empiayers:
ADC Gommunications
Aliina
Amherst N. Wikler Four�afion
ASTD •American Society fa Traininy and Development
B H K� R lnsurance Agency
Ceridian Corparafion
ChetnicalAbuse 8�Y�alence Freven8on Cauncii
Dakota Prevention CoaliBon
Designs fa Leaming
doe and assaciates •
Eden Prairis Pofrce Department
Family Senrice Employee Resaurces
Federal Mediation and Conciliatian Service
G.E. Capiial Fteet Services
HeafthPartriers
Hennepin Co�ty Crime Yictim Counal
Midway Chamber oi Commerce
M'rdwest CenterforOccupationai Heallh and Safety
Minnegasco
Minnesota AFL-CIO
Minnesota Attomey General's O�ice
Minnesota Oepartment of Human Services
Minnesota Departmeoi of Public Safely:
Office af Drug Policy � V'alence PrevenUon
Northem States Power Canpany
Office of the �ovemar oi Minnesafa
Ramsey Ca�nly
St CraxArea United Way
St Paul Pioneer Press
Sand Creek Group Lki.
Sexual V'r�ence Cen#er, Hennepin, Scatt and Carver Caunfies
Theatre at Work
University of St. Thomas
UFCW Lacat 789 Women's Neiwork
�
a � O
� �
sz�
�}w
--��
���
���
�M
� o o'
Zo.�
o�°
� v �'.
� o'
� �
m
�
A
O
Builciing Nonviolent Workplaces
����� ����� � `' ��� �������.
Dates: Occober 17,1996
repeated
November 21,1996
Time: 730 a.m. - 8 a.m.
Regisuation and
Continental Breakfast
8 a.m. -12 Noon
Progtam
Location: Western Service Center
14955 Gala�cie Avenue
Appie Valley, MN 55124
Cost: FREE - sponsored by the
Dakota Prevention Coalition
Who ShouldAttend?
This program is designed for people who
are interested or involved in creating
workplace violence prevention programs,
including human msouree professionals,
union repmsentadves, health and safery
professionals, employee assistance
professionals and ahers.
�
Why Should You Attend?
1. You will leam, in two concurrent sessions, how to
develop and implement workplace violence preven-
tion policies and programs or how to present and
deliver training on workplace violence prevention.
(It ts recommended that at least two employees
from your workplace attend so your organiza-
tion can gain skills in each area.)
Session A — "Developing and ImplementIng
Workplace wolence Prevention
Policies and Programs"
Session B—"Skili Building and Resources for
Trainers"
2. Experience "From the Ground Up," a theaae-based
training about managing wodcplace conflict. Pre-
sented by Tfieatre at Work, a unique uaining
company dedicated to illuminating issues critical to
the well-being and productivity of the workplace.
Executive discussion facilitated by linda Houden,
�ce President, dor and associates.
3. Leam about workplace violence prevention aaivities
and resourees in the Twin Cities, statewide and
beyond.
�.�'j.�'�`v,�-INl
-�r�
, I �. ._..n}'!1'is .� .
Registration Form
Registration is limited to 100 patticipants and will be accepted on a first-come basis. If you pre-registerand then
are unable to attend, call 552-3158 to cancel.
Conference fee: Free - Sponsoied by the Dakota Pre�
(a proiect funded by a federal grant I
Mail or Fax registration to:
Dakota Prevention Coalition
Attn: MaryJanish
161 Nonh Concord Exchangte, #450 ,
South St. Paul, MN 55075 i
Phone: (612) 552•3158 j
Fax: (G12) 5523130 j
ention Coalition in Dakota County
mm the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention)
uirectians: ,
Coming hom the Nonh: Take 35w Sooth ro Counry Road 42.
7Lm leh at the uoplighrs onro 42. Suy on 42 about 8 miks ro'
Apple Valley. Tum kft onro Galvde Avenue.
Coming from the South: Take Hwy 50 North ro Counry Road 42. J
Tum righ[ onto 42. Go three stoplights. Tum kft onto Galazie �
Avenue.
Free parking in Wcscem Service Center lots.
, � ; (please print or rype) �
iOrgani�ation:
Address:
- � ��ty� State: Zip code:
� Phone: Fax:
� Names and titles of participants Concu:rent Session (circk one per partkipant)
= � :•..
..' a:y..
` I�: ' 4s�olxr 17 or Novemlxr 21
;..IR=�;..
1• AorB AorB
�� 2• Aor6 Aor6
��~�v
'"" 3• A or B A or B
���
r,�.s 4. AorB AorB
�*. •�. Number of employees in your company:
k�
I��F� •Attendees aill have the option of purchasing additional materials developed by the Wakplace Action Team, including
workbooks, poscers, videos, pamphleu fasupecvisors and employees.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
September 10, 1996
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adh�ni�fator
,� ,
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer �'�' �
SUBJECT: Audit Presentation
�IlF�1�f=�=3L•P►a
tn June, the firm of Peat Marwick completed the annual audit of the City.
Council has previously received copies of the audit.
Mr. Steve Liable and Ms. Elizabeth Esslinger will be present tonight to
review the audit and be open to any questions by the Council.
LES:kkb
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS
�.!_� •
September 9, 1996
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adnc �m���tor ..
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Direct�r��j^�
SUBJECT: Curley's Valley View - Street Reconstruction F'roject Assessment Heazing
DISCUSSI4N•
The public he,aring cansidering assessments for the Curley's Valley View Street
Reconstruction project was advertised for 7:45 P.M. this evening {see attached memo}, Costs
for this project were set to be $3,500 at the feasibility hearing and the final pmject costs are
within that scope. Additionally, 23 hameowners requested driveway improvements and they
have been charged accordingly.
I will be prepared to give a short presentation and/or answer questions concerning the
praject as required.
REC4MN� �E:NDATION:
I recommend that the assessment roll be adapted as prepared.
ACTION REOUIRED:
Conduct the required public hearing and then if Council desires to implement the
recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resoiution 96- , RESOLLTTION
ADOPTII�TG AND C4NFIItMIl�TG ASSPSSMENTS FOR THE
RECONSTRUCTIONIREHABILT"TATION IIVIPROVEMENTS TO SERVE CLfRLEY`S
VALLEY VIEW ADDITION ANL? STJRROUNDING AREAS (IMPRO%�EM'ENT NQ. 93,
PROJ'ECT NO. 4).
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
RE50LUTION ADOPTING AND COrTFIIt1VIING ASSESSMENTS
FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION/REHABILITATION IlVIPROVIIVIENTS TO SERVE
CURLEY' S VALLEY VIEW ADDITION AND SURROUNDING AREAS
(IlVIPROVIIVIENT NO. 93, PROJECT NO. 4)
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, has calculated
the proper amount to be specially assessed for the costs incurred to date with respect to
Improvement No. 93, Project No. 4 constxuction of Street Reconstruction/Rehabilitation
improvements to serve the following described property situated in the City of Mendota
Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows:
Those parcels abutting Cullen Avenue, Mary Adele Avenue, Patricia Avenue, Theresa
Street, Timmy Street, Tom Thumb Boulevard and William Court.
WHEREAS, the proposed assessment roll has been on file with the Clerk and at all
times since its filing has been open for public inspection; and notice thereof has been duly
published and mailed as required by law. Said notice stated the date, time and place of such
meeting; the general nature of the improvement; the area proposed to be assessed; that the
proposed assessment roll has been on file with the Clerk; and that written or oral objections
thereto by any property owner would be considered; and
WHEREAS, said hearing was held at 7:45 o'clock P.M. or as soon as possible
thereafter, on 1�esday, September 17, 1996, at City Hall in the City of Mendota Heights,
Minnesota.; and
WSEREAS, the Mayor announced that the hearing was open for the consideration of
objections, if any, to said proposed assessments; and
V �+ , all persons present were then given an opportunity to present oral
objections, and all written objections theretofore filed with the Clerk were presented and
considered.
NOW THEREFORE, tlus Council, having heard and considered all objections so
presented, and being fully advised in the premises, and having made all necessary adjustments
and conections, finds that each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the
proposed assessment roll was and is specially benefited by the consiruction of said
improvements in not less than the amount of the assessment, as corrected, set opposite the
description of each such lot, piece and parcel of land, respectively, and that such amount so set
out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein des-
cribed; and
BE IT FITR7'HER RESOLVED, that the proposed assessment roll when adopted and
confirmed as to the proper special assessment for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of 1and
respectively, and the assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of seven
percent (7 °b ) per annum accruing on the full amount thereof from time to time unpaid, shall be
a lien concurrent with general taxes upon such parcel and all thereof. The total amount of
each assessment as to street reconstniction/rehabilitation improvements shall be payable in
equal amounts extending over a period of nineteen (19) years; the first of said installments,
together with interest on the entire assessment commencing thirty (30) days from the date of
the official letter of assessment to December 31, 1996, to be payable with general taxes for the
year 1996, collectible in 1997, one of each of the remaining installments, together with one
year's interest on that and all other unpaid installments, to be payable with general taxes for
each consecutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that prior to October 17, 1996 the owner of any lot,
piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the whole of such assessment,
without interest to the City Treasurer; and
BE IT FiJRTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall prepare and transmit to the
County Auditor a certified duplicate of said assessment roll with each then unpaid installment
and interest set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County, and
the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessments in the manner provided by law.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17th day of September,
1996.
CITY COUNCII.
CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTPST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
�,
MYY i ul�l�l� � _ :�:1�I .Y1�..
�� 1 �!►/ �
l ��'�o
August 15, i�'
T4: Ma or Ci Council and Ci Ad���n��i�tar
Y � tY tY
FROM: Tom Knuth, Sez►i.ar Engineer Technician
SI}B,TECT: Assessment Rall Information - Curleys Valley View A�rea.
Job No, 9311
Imp. 93-4
Attached is a copy of the pmposed assessment mll for Curley's Valley View Addition.
: ; , � � 1►l�
The feasibility report for this project was p:t�esented to Council in June of 1995. T1us is
a 104 parcel area with 8 vacant lots including 51ots in the new Dakota Bank Plat on 14sary
Ade1e.
At the feasibility hearing in 1995, Cauncil set a per lat assessment af $3,SQ0 with #he
City assuming 50 � of project costs. As of this week, storm sewer, curbs, driveways, and the
first lift of bituminous are in place. Sodding will follow shortly and a decision on when to
place the final lift of bituminous will be made after sod is in place. To date costs have heen in
1i.ne with feasibility estimates.
The majority of the pr�perties will have an assessment af $3,500. There were 23
pmperty owners that requested extra driveway improvements and they have been charged
apprapriately. The five Io�s owned by Dakota Bank have a street assessment af $3,500 and a
$1,900 assessment far sewer and water services. Unpaid ui�lity main assessments cantinue ta
be deferred as per Develapers Agreement far Dakota Valley View PIa�. The small U.S. West
1ot an Cullen will be assessed as a'h Iot.
� . i ut�i��l�.l� ; ti i �
The Curley area st�+eet i+econstructian pmject curnently is not fully campleted, but 95 9b
of the work wili be done by the end of August. Due to the considerable interest expense
which wauld accrue on this project, s�taff reGammends that the City ce�ctify the assessment roll
this year, rather than delay it until next year.
m
It is recommended that a public hearing be conducted at the September 17, 1996 City
Council meeting to consider adoption of the atta.ched assessment roll.
i_. • , � i .�, J�i �
Review the attached assessment roll, make any changes and then if Council desires to
implement the Staff recommendation, pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 96- ,
"Resolution Calling for Hearing on Assessment Roll�for Curley's Valley View and
Surnounding Area Improvements (Improvement No. 93, Project No. 4)".
ASSESSMENT PERIOD
Street Reconst�ucdon -19 years
Sewer and Water • 19 yeatr3
�r��.sx xA� - ��
CiTY OF MENDOTA IiEIGHTS
ASSESSMENT ROLL
CURLEY'S VALLEY VIEW AND SURROUNTIING AREAS
REHABILITATIONIRECONS'1'RUCTiON
JOB NO. 9311, IMP. 93-0
ADOPTED: 9-i7-96
AA,SSSFSSMENT RATES:
Street Reconstruction - $3,500 per lot
(Street RehabititatiantReconstzuctian Fnnd • 509U}
Sewer and Water -$1,900 per lot
PARCEL REPUTED Oi�VNER AND � SUBDIVISION LUT BLK SEWER AND DRIVEWAY STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. WATER RECONST.
27-02600- Robe�rt P. & Marie K. Kun:� Section 26, 'I�vn 28 Range 23 S3,SOO.UO $3,500.00
040-SO 989 William Court S 100 ft of N 535.6 ft af W 300 8 of E 330
MOIIC%pt& HCi�FitBy MN 55120 ft of Gav L3
27-0260U- Peter F. & Mary Eliz Honsa Sec$on 26, Twn 28 Range 23 $3,SQQ.QO $3,500.40
OSQ-50 995 William Court S 153 ft of N 688.6 ft of W 300 ft of E 330
Mendota Htights, MN 55120 ft of Gav L3
27-02600- Lyle & Mary Lou Cavey Section 26, 'Itvn 28 Range 23 $3,SOO.pO $3,50U.00
051-51 2170 I.exington Avenue N 85 ft of S 434 Ft of W 280 ft af SW 1!4
Mendata I�eights, MN 55120 of SW 2J4
27-02G00- US West KIaus Cox Carp. T� Dept Section 26, 'i�vn 28, Range 23 51,750.44 SI,'TSO,OQ
052•51 6300 S. Syracuse Way, #7Q0 N N 85ft of S 430 8 of E 50 8 of
Englewood, GO 80111 W 330 ft of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4
27-02600- Walter L. & Grace Hunter Section 26, Twn 28 Rang� 23 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
Q64-50 100! William Court S l iQ R of N 798.6 8 of W 34Q ft of B 330
Mendota Heights, MN 55I20 ft of Gov L3
27-02b40- Shir2ey Nie2son Section 26> Twn 2$ R$ttge 23 $3,500.00 $3,SQ4.00
Ob0-51 2180 L,exington Avenue S. S 285 ft of W 330 ft of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4
Mendota Heighte, MN 55120
Curleys 1
C�
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LUT BLK SEWER AND DRIVEWAY STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. WATER RECONST.
27-02640- Thomaa E. MceIlistrem Sect'roa 26, 'I�vn 28 Rang� 23 �3,500.00 $3,50U.OQ
070-50 1007 William Court 300 ft o£ B 330 S of S 145.2 ft of N 943.
Mendota Heighta, MN 55120 S of W 1!2 of SW i/4
27-02600- L,eo E. & Beverly C. Campisi Secdon 26, 'I�vn 28 Range 23 �3,500.U0 $3,500.00
070-Si 2Q25 William Court I16 cft of W 300 ft of E 330 ft of N 1335
Mendota Heights, MN 5512Q ft of W 1/2 of SW 1/4
27-02600- Lawrence & Lynn Brennan Sectioa 26, 'I�vn 28 Raage 23 �3,5d0.d0 $3,500.00
080-50 1013 William Court 300 ft o£ E 33p ft of S 145.2 ft of N 108
Mendota Iieights, MN 55120 R af W 112 of SW 2/4
27-02600- Richard C. & Helen Johnson Sectiton 26, Twn 28 Rsnge 23 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
094-50 1.014 Witiiam Court S i30 ft of N 2219 ft of W 300 ft af E 334
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 ft of Gov L3
27-19100 Thomas O. Curley Cur2ay's Valleq View 9 1 �i,?Sd.00 �1,�50.00
092-01 1044 Highway 110 Und 1/2 int in Lat 9, Blk 1
Meadata Hcights, MN 5512Q
27-19100 Mary A. Curley Curley's VaU.ey View 9 1 $1,750.Q0 $1,'75Q,U0
093-01 1044 Highway 120 Und 112 int ia Lot 9, Blk 1
Mendoka Heights, MN 55120
27-I9IU0 Thomas J. & Maria Gurley Curley'$ Vailey View 11 1 $3,SU0.00 a3,S00.00
110-Qi 2049 Patxicia 56reet All of Lot 10, Blk 1 and N 27.5 ft af
Mendaka Heights, MN 55120
2?-19100- Mark. J. Ascher & Melissa C. Maude Curley's Valley View 12 1 $3,5QU.Q0 �3,5QQ.Q0
120-01 20b1 Patricia Street S. 57.5 i� of Lot 12, BIk 1& N 67.5 ft af
Mendat� Heighta, MN 55120
27-19100- effrey & Laum E. Herold Curley's Valley View 13 1 a3,500.00 S3,5U0.00
130-Qi 2071 Patticia Sh�et S 17.5 R of Lot 12, B1k 1 and all of
Meadat� Heights, MN 55120
Curleys 2
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK SEWER AND DRIVEWAY STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. WATER RECONST.
27-19100- Bradley C. Elltin Curley's Valley View 3 2 $3,SU0.00 $3,SU0.00
030-02 2036 Timmy All of Lot 2, Blk 2& N 10 ft of
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-191U0- ames P. & Anne D. Kreiser Curley's Valley View 4 2 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
040-02 2048 Timmy Street Ex N 10 ft of Lot 3, Blk 2 and N 45 ft of
Mendota Hcights, MN 55120
27-19100- P.B. 8c Mary Daitiel Curley's Valley View 6 2 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
060-02 2056 Timmy Street S 30 ft of Lot 4, Blk 2 and all of Lot 5,
Mendota Heighta, MN 55120 Blk. 2& N 5 ft of
27-19100- Ronald A 8c Mary Buehlack Curley's Valley View 7 2 $3,SOO.OU $3,500.00
070-02 2064 Timmy Street S 70 ft of Lot 6, Blk 2& N 40 ft of
Mendota Heighta, MN 55120
27-19100- Harlan B. Holmquist & Mary E. Brekke Curley's Valley View 8 2 a3,50U.00 $3,500.00
080-02 2076 Timmy Street S 35 ft of Lot 7, Blk 2& all of
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19100- Yuriy Gerner 8c Regina Alexandrova Curley's Valley View 10 2 $3,500.00 $3,SOO.OU
100-02 2086 Timmy Street All of Lot 9, Blk 2& N 35 ft of
Mendota Heighta, MN 55120
27-1910U- Stephen P. & Terry Capiz Curley's Valley View 11 2 a3,500.U0 $3,500.00
110-02 2094 Timmy Street S 40 ft of Lot 10, Blk 2& N 65 ft of
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19100- esley & Virginia Anderson Curley's Valley View 12 2 $3,500.00 a3,500.0U
120-02 2098 Timmy Street S 10 ft of Lot 11, Blk 2& all of lot
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Curleys 3
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK SEWER AND DRIVEWAY STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. WATER RECONST.
27-19100- Eric J 8c Julia M. Mattson Curley's Valley View 13 2 $3,020.00 S3,500.00 $6,520.00
130-02 2102 Timtny Street
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19100- Lealie A& Richard K. Arnold Curley's Valley View 15 2 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
150-02 2108 Timmy Street All of Lot 14, Blk 2& Pt of Lot 15, Blk 2
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Lyittg N of liae com 45 ft N of SW cor
NE to Pt on E line 2� ft N
27-19100- Mazk J. & Mary L. Blanchard/John Blanchazd Curley's Valley View 16 2 $3,SOO.OU $3,500.00
160-02 1049 William Court S 1/2 of Pt of Lot 15, Blk 2lying W of E
Mendota Heighte, MN 55120 line Lot 16 Prod N and all of
27-19100- Richard & Marian Huettl Curley's Valley View 17 2 53,500.00 $3,500.00
170-02 1043 William Court All of Lot 17, Blk 2& Pt of Lot 15, Blk 2
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 & S of line com 33 ft N of NW Cor
Lot 17 on W lino said lot
27-19100- KentS. & Linda Herschbach Curley's Valley View 2 3 $3,SOU.00 $3,50O.OU
020-03 2049 Timmy Street All of Lot 1, Blk 3 and N 60 ft of
Mendota Heighte, MN 55120
27-19100- Wm J 8c Alicia R Olson Cutley's Valley View 4 3 $4,d00.00 $3,500.00 $7,500.00
040-03 2059 Timmy Street S 20 ft of Lot 2, Blk 3& all of Lot 3,
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Blk 3 and N 20 ft of
27-19100- Chazles Jr. & Elizabe Frid Curley's Valley View 5 3 53,500.00 $3,500.00
050-03 2069 Timmy Street Ex N 20 ft of Lot 4, Blk 3, Ex S 20 ft of
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19100- Harry D. & Mazgaret Wise Curley's Valley View 7 3 $2,870.00 $3,500.00 a6,370.00
070-03 2077 Timmy Street 20 ft of Lot 5, Blk 3& All of Lot 6, Blk 3
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 & N 20 ft of
27-19100- Robert D& Suean J"Schamberger Cutley's Vall�y View 8 3 a2,915.00 $3,SUO.OU a6,415.00
080-03 2089 Tunmy Street Ex N 20 ft of Lot 7, Blk 3 Ex S 20 ft of
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Curleys 4
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK SEWER AND DRIVEWAY STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIP'FION N4. NO. WATER RECONST.
27-19100- ames F. & Joyce M. Carncy Curley's Valley View 1Q 3 �3,500.00 $3,500.00
100-43 2Q95 Timmy Street 20 ft of Lot 8$lk 3& all of Lat 9, Blk 3
Mondota Hcights, MN 55120 Bx S 60 ft af
27•19200- Steven Godes Curley's Valley Yiaw 12 3 �3,SQ0.00 �3,504.00
110-03 2101 Timmy Street S 60 f� of Lot 10, Blk 3, Ex S 20 ft af
Mendota Heighta, MN 55120
27-19100- Mark I& Rozanne Crowley Curley's Valley View 12 3 $3,500.00 a3,500.00
i24-03 21Q5 Timmy Street S 20 ft af 7.at i 1, Bik 3 all af Lat 12, Blk 3
Mendata�Hcights, MN 55120 Ex S 10 ft L12 incl in Curley's Valley
View Replat
27-19100- Frank T& Joan Filnc,y Curley's Valley View 1S 3 54,300.00 $3,SU0.00 $7,800.00
i5b-03 2108 Thoresa Lane N 100 ft of Lat 14, Blk 3& S 4Q ft af
Meadota Heights, MN 55120
?-191Q0- Frank T& Joan Pilney Cur2eq's Valley View 16 3 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
160-Q3 2108 Theresa Lane N 40 ft of Lat 15, Blk 3& all of
Mendota Hcights, MN 55120
27-191U0- Stuart C Bear & Marsha J Schoenkin Curley's Valley View ].8 3 S2,S50.00 S3,SU0.00 $6,OSO.QCI
180-03 2Q98 '�'heresa Lanc N 4Q ft af Lai 18 Blk 3& S 61 ft of
Mendata Heights, MN 55120 .
27-19200- Brace D& Tvvy2a M Kelty Curley's Vatley Vicw i4 3 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
190-03 2088 Theresa I.ane All of Lot 17, Bik 3& S 40 ft of
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19100- Thomas E& C J Klecatsky Curley's Valley Viow 21 3 $3,SQO.OU $3,500.00
2l0-03 2478 Thoresa� I.ane N 19 ft of Lat 19, BIk 3& all of Lot 20
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Blk. 3& S 40 ft of
7-19100- enomo E& Baveriy Peterson Curley's Valtey View 22 3 S2,S00.00 $3,500.00 56,000.40
220-03 2066 Theresa Street N 40 ft of Lot 21, Blk 3& all of
Meadota Hcights, MN 5512Q
Curleys 5
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LUT BLK SEWER AND DRIVEWAY STREET TOTAL
N4, DESCRIPTI4N N4. NO. WATER RECONST.
27-19100- ohn (3 8c Linda L Traxler Curley's Valley View 24 3 S3,SOO.OQ $3,500.00
240-03 2Q58 Theresa Street All of Lot 23, Blk 3& S 40 ft of
Mendota Fieights, MN 5512Q
27-19140- Barbara Till James Curley's Valley View 25 3 53,500.00 $3,500,00
250-03 2050 Theresa N 4Q ft of Lot 24, Blk 3& a11 of
Mendata Heights, MN 55120
27-19100- Pattick M. & Mary Sweeney Curley's Valley View 1 4 $3,500.00 $3,500.OU
Qi0-04 2!?47 Tiieresa Street
Mendota Heights, MN SSi20
27-19100- Dsuyl B& Bsrbara L Nelsan Curiey's Va13ey View 2 4 �3,SQ0.00 $3,504.00
020-04 2053 Theresa 5treet -
Mendata Heights, MN 55120
27-19100- ames P MeShane Curley's Vallay View 3 4 52,845.00 �3,5U0.00 $6,345.00
Q30-Q4 2U61 Tlzaresa I.aao
Mendata Heights, MN 5512Q
2?-19100- RandalJ & Karen K Pick Curley's Valley View 4 4 �2,774.40 �3,500.00 $6,270.00
040-04 2067 Theress Street
Mendota Iieights, MN 55124
27-19100- Ardys B Wa1sh Lofgren Curley's Valley View 5 4 $2,450.00 53,500.Q0 a5,950.0U
050-04 2075 Therestt
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-I9100- .Atexander & Raisa W Presaman Cur2ey's Valtey View 6 4 SI,d20.00 �3,500.00 $4,520.00
060-04 2081 Theresa Lane
Mcadata Heights, MN 55120
27-191U0- Bernard A& Pauline Cazlson Curley's Valley View 8 4 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
080-04 091 Thoresa L,sae I.,at 7 and
Mendota Heighta, MN 55120
Curleys 6
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK SEWER AND DRIVEWAY STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. WATER RECONST.
27-19100- Mark R Kapaun & Kaduyn L Frederickson Curley's Valley View 10 4 $3,500.00 $3,SOO.UO
100-04 2099 Theresa Street All of Lot 9, Blk 4& N 10 ft of
Mendota Heighte, MN 55120
27-1910U- Barbara A. Levina & Sara Lynn Newberger Curley's Valley View 10 4 $3,SU0.00 $3,500.00
101-04 2103 Theresa Street Ex N 10 ft of
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19100- Nancy J Haley Curley's Valley View 11 4 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
110-04 1083 William Court
Mendota Heighta, MN 55120
27-1910U- Albert & Elizabeth Price Curley's Valley View 12 4 $2,800.00 $3,500.00 $6,3U0.00
120-04 21Q6 Patricia Lane
Mendota Hcights, MN 55120
27-19100- Albeit & Elizabeth Price Curley'e Valley View 13 4 $3,SOO.UO $3,500.00
130-04 2106 Patricia Lane All of
� Mendota Heighta, MN 55120
27-19100- Carey L& Janet L Favorite Curley's Valley View 14 4 $3,500.00 $3,SOO.QO
140-04 2098 Patricia Street
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19100- ohn D& Linda Nidea Curley's Valley View 16 4 $2,850.00 $3,SU0.00 $6,350.00
160-04 2094 Patricia All of Lot 15, Blk 4& S 10 ft of
Mendota Heighte, MN 55120
27-19100- David P& Helen C Lucente Curley's Valley View 17 4 $3,720.00 a3,500.00 $7,220.00
170-04 2086 Patricia N 75 ft of Lot 16, Blk 4& S 42.5 ft of
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Curleys 7
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK SEWER AND DRIVEWAY STREET TOTAL
NU. DESCRIPTIUN NO. NU. YVATER RECONST.
27-19100- Arthur P& Lea Taylar Curley's Valley View 18 4 $4,040.00 $3,SOO.UO 57,540.00
180-04 2078 Patricia Stroet N 42.5 ft of Lot 17, Blk 4& S 75 ft of
Meadota Heights, MN 55120
27-1910Q- Cazl & Helma Yaeger Curley's VaUay View 19 4 $3,SOQ.00 $3,5Q4.00
190-Q4 20fi8 Patricia Street N 10 ft of Lot 18, Blk 4& a11 of
Mendoka Heighta, MN 55120
27-19100- Robert & Patr"tcia Baber Curley's Valley View 20 4 a3,S00.00 �3,500.00
200-04 2Q60 Palxicia Street
Mendota i%ights, MN 55120
27-1410Q- udith A Johnsaa Cur2ey's Valley View 21 4 $3:500.04 �3,500.00
210-04 2054 Patricia St�eet
Mendota Heights, MN 5512p
27-19100- Gina P$ifulk Curley's Valley View 22 4 $3,500.00 $3,5Q0.00
220-04 2Q44 Patticia Streei
Mendota Iieights, MN 5512Q
27-19100- Mazilytt Hays Curley's Valley View 2 5 $3r500.00 $3�500.00
020-05 2085 Patxicia 5treet Lats 1 and
Mendata Heights, MN 55124
27-19100- Bva N. Gountania Curley's Valley View 4 5 $3,500.00 53,500.00
Q�l-05 2045 Pa.tricia Street AlI of Lot 3, Bik 5& N 20 ft of
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19100- Veraan T& Muriel A Kane Cur2ey's Valtey View 5 S S3,SOd.00 $3,500.00
050-05 2101 Patricia Street S 65 8 of Lot 4, Blk 5& N 4$ ft of
Mendota Fieights, MN 5512Q
27-19100- Sara Jo Peotter Curley's Valley View 6 5 �3,540.00 �3,SQ0.00
Qb0-0S 2111 Pakicia Street S 31 ft of Lot S, Blk 5& aII af
Mendota Hei ts MN 55120
Curleys $
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK SEWER AND DRIVEWAY STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. WATER RECONST.
27-19100- Lawrence M. & Rita M Ryan Curley's Valley View 7 5 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
070-OS 2119 Patricia Street
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19100- Dewey O& Debra J Sauth Curley's Valley Vi�w 9 5 $3,500.00 $3,SQ0.00
090-OS 1088 William Court All of Lot 8, Blk 5& W 13 ft of
Mendota Heighta, MN 55120
27-19100- amea M 8c Betsy J Jamar Curley'a Valley View 10 5 $S,SU0.00 $3,500.00 $9,040.00
100-OS 1080 William Court x W 13 ft of Lot 9, Blk 5, ex pt of Lot 10
Mendota Heights, MN 5510 Blk 5, beg most N cor Lot 11, Blk 5 N, &
NW oa NE line Lot 10 50 ft
27-19100- David L& Barbara Ayers Curley's Valley View 11 5 $3,50�.00 $3,SU0.00
110-OS 2121 Theresa Street Lot 11, Blk 5& Lot 10, Blk 5 Beg Moet
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 N Cor Lot 11, Blk 5, N& NW on NE line
Lot 10, 50 ft SW to pt on W line
27-19100- Suresh T& PallaviShah Curley's Valley View 13 5 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
130-OS 2131 Theresa Avenue All of Lot 12, Blk 5& N 40 ft of
Mendota Heighta, MN 55120
27-19100- Samuel R Shepard Curl�y's Valley View 14 5 $3,SOU.00 �3,500.00
140-OS 2141 Theress S�t Ex N 40 ft of Lot 13, Blk 5 and all of
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19100- Geno R& Rhoda B Engelson Curley's Valley View 16 5 $3,500.00 $3,SOU.00
160-OS 2151 Thcresa Street All of Lot 15, Blk 5& N 40 ft of Lot
Mendota Heighta, MN 55120
27-19100- Morrie J Allen & Phyllis S Gorin Curl�y's Valley View 1? 5 $3,SOU.00 $3,SOO.QO
170-OS 2161 Theresa Street Ex N 40 ft of Lot 16, Blk 5 and all of
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Curleys 9
PARCEL REPUTED Ut�VNER AND SUBDIVISION LUT BLK SEWER AND DRIVEWAY STREET TOTAi.
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. WATER RECONST.
27-19150- ohn R& Aiico B Qberg Curley's Vallay View Replat 1 $3,500.00 $3,540.00
610-QO 1037 William Court
Mendota Heighta, MN 5510
27-19150- Gordon L& Anne M Hermann Curley's Valley View Replat 2 $9,660.00 $3,500.04 $13,160.U0
Q24-OU 1033 William Court I,ot 2 Ex pt taken far flwy
Mcndata Heighta, MN
27-1915Q- imothy E Sr A2drich Cur2ey's Valtey View Replat 3 $125.40 �3,SOO.UO $3,625,00
03W}Q 1040 William Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 �
27-19150- omas T 8c Marlys J Palmer Curley's Va11ey View Replat 4 $125.00 �3,500.00 $3,625.00
o�.o-�o zaso wilt�� co�c
Mendota Heighte, MN 55120
2?-19150- Ssrah C Bradford Cur2ey's Vatley View Rep2at S $2,500.00 a3,500.00 $6,d00.OQ
O50-QQ 2130 Timmy Street
Meadota, Hcights, MN 55124
27-19150- Gary & Nancy Crippen Curley's Valley View Replat 6 �3,500.00 $3,500.00
Q60-OQ 2140 Timmy Street
Mendot,a Heights, MN 5512p
27-19150 Rosemary E Massberg Cur2ey's Valley View R�plat '7 $3,500.00 $3,5q0.00
070-pQ 2350 Tirnmy Street
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19150- ohn J& Sharon R Liska Curley's Valley View Replat 8 �3,SQ0.00 $3,50U.OU
080-40 216{t Timmy Street
Mendota Heighta, MN 55120
Gur2eys 20
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK SER'ER AND DRIVEWAY STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. WATER RECONST.
27-19150- Saleh & Deanna Canavati Curley's Valley View Replat 9 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
090-00 2166 Timmy Street
Mendota Heighta, MN 55120
27-19150- incent G& Judith Anderson Curley's Valley View Replat 11 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
110-00 1062 Cullen Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19150- Maria E Calderon Curley's Valley View Replat 12 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
120-00 1068 Cullen Avenue
Mendota Heighta, MN 55120
27-19150- Richard W& Anne M Post Curley's Valley View Replat 13 $3,550.00 $3,500.00 $7,050.00
130-00 1090 Cullen Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19150- Dennis G& Connie L Kurth Curley's Valley View Replat 14 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
140-00 1096 Cullen Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19150- Edward & June Sutich Curley's Valley View Replat 15 $3,SQ0.00 $3,500.00
150-00 1071 Cullen Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
2'7-19150- Michael T& Carolyn Pilney . Curl�y's Valley View Replat 16 $3,SOO.OU $3,500.00
160-00 2154 Theresa Street
Mendota Heighte, MN 55120
27-19150- Shirley M. Hetherington Curley's Valley View Replat 17 $2,910.00 $3,500.00 $6,410.00
170-00 2144 Theresa Street
Mendota Hoights, MN 55120
Curleys 11
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK SEWER AND DRIVEWAY STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. WATER RECONST.
27-19150- Robert K& Bea H Langford Curley's Valley View Replat 18 $3,500.00 $3,SOU.00
180-00 2138 Theresa Street
Mendota Heighte, MN 55120
27-19150- Stephen L& Kath Liston Curley's Valley View Replat 19 a3,500.00 $3,SU0.00
190-OU 2132 Theresa Street
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19150- David J& Barbara J Odlaug Curley'e Valley View Replat 20 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
200-00 2122 Theresa Street
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19150- Michael & Mary E Rancone Curley's Valley View Replat 21 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
21aao 1061 wiuia�n courc
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19150- Norman D& Arvilla Beckman Curley's Valley View Replat 22 a3,500.00 $3,SOO.OU
220-00 2125 Timmy Str�t
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19150- Betty Lou Berreman Curley's Valley View Replat 23 $3,500.00 $3,SOU.UO
230-00 2135 Timmy Street
Mendota Heighta, MN 55120
27-19150- Batry W 8c Diane M Bicanich Curley's Valley View Replat 24 $2,360.00 53,500.00 $5,860.00
240-00 2145 Timmy Street
Mendota Heighta, MN 55120
27-19150- Richard F Skrivanek Curley's Valley View Replat 25 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
250-00 2155 Timmy Street
Mendota Heighte, MN 55120
27-19150 Richatd F Tste Dugan & Yvone J Tste Dugan Curley's Valley View Replat 26 $3,500.00 $3,SQ0.00
260-00 2165 Timmy Street
Mendota Hei ts MN 55120
Curleys 12
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK SEWER AND DRIVEWAY STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO. WATER RECONST.
27-19750- Thomas and Mary Curley Dakota Valley View Addition 2 2 $1,900.00 $3,500.00 $5,400.00
020-02 2010 I.oxington Avenue
Mendota Heighte, MN 55120
27-19750- Thomas and Mary Curley Dakota Valley View Addition 3 2 �;1,900.00 a3,500.00 $5,400.00
030-02 2010 L.exington Avenue
Mendota Heighte, MN 55120
27-19750- Thomas and Mary Curley Dakota Valley View Addition 4 2 S1,900.00 �3,500.00 $5,400.00
040-02 2010 I,exington Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19750- omas and Mary Curley Dakota Valley View Addition 5 2 �1,900.00 $3,500.00 a5,400.00
050-02 2010 Learington Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-19750- Thomas and Mary Curley Dakota Valley View Addition 6 6 $1,900.00 $3,500.00 $5,400.00
060-02 2010 Leadngton Avenue
Mendota Hei ts MN 55120
Curleys 13
PARCEL REPUTED O�VNER AND SUBDIVISION LQT BLK SEWER AND DRIVEWAY STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTIQN NO. NO. WATER RECONST.
27-19750- Thamas aad Mary Curley Dakota Valley View Addition 2 2 $I,4QO.p{} �3,500.00 $5,404.00
020-02 1044 Highway 110
Mendota Heighta, MN 55120
27-19'i50- Thomas and Mary Curley Dakata Valley View Addition 3 2 $1,900.00 $3,500.00 $5,40U.00
030-02 IQ44 Highway 11Q
Mendot,a Hcighta, MN 55120
27-19'T50- omas and Mazy Curley Dakota, Yatley View Addition 4 2 $1,940.00 $3,SOO.Op $5,400.00
040-02 1044 Highway 110
Mendota Iieights, MN 5512Q
27-19'750- Thomas and Mary Curley Dakota Valley View Addition 5 2 $1,900.W $3,SUO.OU $5,400.00
O50-QZ I044 Highway 110
Mendota Heighta, MN 55120
27-19150- omas aad Mary Curley Dakata Valley View Addition 6 6 $1,400.00 $3,500.00 $5,40U.00
060-02 1044 Highway 110
MBR�O�kt �I61 ts MN 55220
Cur2eys 23
.-
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
September 9, 1996
TO: Mayor, City Council and City A' strator
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works D' t
SUBJECT: Mendota Meadows - Public Improvements Assessment Hearing
DISCUSSION•
The public hearing for the Mendota Meadows public improvements was advertised for
8:OU P.M. this evening (see attached memo). Costs for this project are slightly higher than the
feasibility report envisioned for this pmject due to the fact that the developer reduced the totai
number of units from 36 to 34 when he increased the number of single townhome units.
I will be prepared to give a short presentation and/or answer questions concerning this
project.
RECONIl��ENDATION:
I recommend that the assessment roll be adopted as prepared.
ACTION REQUIRED•
Conduct the required public hearing and then if Council desires to implement the
recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 96- ,
RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND COrfFIRMII�TG ASSESSMENT5 POR SAI�IITARY
SEWER, WAT�dRMAINS, STORM 5EWER AND STREET IlVIPROVIIVIENTS TO SERVE
MENDOTA MEADOWS (IMPROVIIViENT NO. 95, PROJECT NO. 1)
�
�
'•
yYll • ul' �1� � : +1�! .Mh
,�1�!u 1
August 14, 199b
Mayor, City Council and City Adm���ator �
Tom Knuth, Senior F�gineer Technician
SUB7ECT: Assessment Roll Information - Mendota Meadaws
Job No. 9506
Imp. 95-1
Attached is a capy of the proposed assessment mll for the Mendota Meadows project as
being developed by Mr. 7ohn Mathern. Mr. Mathern petitioned for this project and waived all
rights for a public hearing, however he has now developed 21 Iois, and we recommend that a
hearing now be condacted.
: : ; : � �►� r
The feasibi�lity x�port for this project was presented to Council in August of 1994.
T�is was a 36 parcel subdivisian wi#h 2 parc�Is der.iicated as panding and open space.
The feasibility report estimated the following praject costs as:
Utilities
Streets, Wa1ks, and Lights
Estimated per lot cost was:
�11�: `�1 t ! k.
$181,300
$128,00(?
$3(}9,3Q0
: .1!
The final construdzon costs are $230,$14 pius overhead of $12,032 {31 %) for a toial
project cost of $302,9U6.
Since the develaper submitted a revised plat with 34 instead of 361ots, the per lot
assessment rose sligh�lp, even though project casts were below e;stimate.
Tot�a.i per lot assessment far the 34 lats in Mendota IvIeadows is $8,909.
�
a
�
� � ui►�r _►i� ; y � �
It is recommended that a public hearing be caaducted at the September 17, 1996 City
Gouncii meeting to consider adoption of the at�ached assessment roll.
: Y f � C .; li: �li
Review the attached assessment mll, make any changes and then if Council desires to
implement the Staff recommendatioa, pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 96- ,
"Resoluiion Calling For Hear3ng on Assessment Roll for Mendata Meadows (Improvement
No. 95, Project NfJ. 1) Impmvements."
a
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING �1VD CONFIRA�IING ASSESSMENTS
FOR SAIVITARY SEWER, WATERMAINS, STORM SEWER AND STREET
IlVIPROVFMENTS TO SERVE MENDOTA MEADOWS
(IlVIPROVIIVIENT NO. 95, PROJECT NO. 1)
BE IT ItFSOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights as follows:
WHF.REAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, has calculated
the proper amount to be specially assessed for the costs incurred to date with respect to
Improvement No. 95, Project No. 1 construction of sanitary sewers, watermai.ns, storm sewer
and street improvements to serve the following described property situated in the City of
Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows:
Mendota Meadows
WHEREAS, the proposed assessment roll has been on file with the Clerk and at all
times since its filing has been open for public inspection; and notice thereof has been duly
published and mailed as required by law. Said notice stated the date, time and place of such
meeting; the general nature of the improvement; the area proposed to be assessed; that the
proposed assessment roll has been on file with the Clerk; and that written or orai objections
thereto by aay property owner would be considered; and
WHEREAS, said hearing was held at 8:00 o'clock P.M. or as soon as possible
thereafter, on Tuesday, September 17, 1996, at City Hall in the City of Mendota Heights,
Minnesota; and
WH��R]CAS, the Mayor announced that the hearing was open for the consideration of
objections, if any, to said proposed assessments; and
WHEREAS, all persons present were then given an opporlunity to present oral
objections, and all written objections theretofore filed with the Clerk were presented and
considered.
NOW THEREFORE, this Council, having heard and considered all objections so
presented, and being fully advised in the premises, and having made all necessary adjustments
and corrections, finds that each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the
proposed assessment roll was and is specially benefited by the construction of said
improvements in not less than the amount of the assessment, as corrected, set opposite the
description of each such lot, piece and parcel of land, respectively, and that such amount so set
�
aut is hereby Ievied against each of the respective lats, pieces and parcels of land therein des-
cribed; and
BE IT F'URTBER �►ESUL��D, tl�at the propased assessment mll is hereby adopted
and confumed as the proper special assessment for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of ]and
respectively, and the assessment against each parcel, together with interesi at ihe rate of seven
percent (7�) per annum accruing on the full amount thereof from time to ti.me unpaid, shall be
a lien concarrent with general taxes upon such pam,el and all thereaf. The total amount of
each such assessment as to sanitaiy sewers, starm sewers, and watermains sha11 be payable in
eq�al amounts e�ctending over a period of nine#,een (19} years aad each assessment as to st�neets,
curb and gutter shall be payable in equai amounts extending aver a period of ten (lp) years;
the first of said inst�illments, tagether with interest an the entire assessment commencing thirty
(30) days from the date hereaf to December 31, 1996, to be payable with general ta�ces far the
ye�ar I996, collectible in 199�, and ane of each of the remaining installments, together with
one year's interest on that and all other unpaid installments, ta be payable with general tau�es
far each consecutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid; and
BE IT F'URTHIIt I��ESULVED, that prior ta 4ctober 3, 199b, the owner af any lot,
piece or parcel of land assessed hexeby may at any time pay the whole of such assessment,
without interest to the City Treasurer; and
BE IT FURTSER RESOLVEU, that the Clerk shall prepare and ttansmit ta the
County Auditor a certified daplicate ai said assessment roll with each then unpaid installment
and interest set farth separately, ta be extended upan the proper tax lists of the Cvunty, and
the County Auditor shall ths�after callect said assessments in the manner provided by 1aw.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Ileights this 1'7th day af September,
1996.
• �
• �- � • _ �:�
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
. •
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
ASSESSMENT PERIOD
Sanitary Sewers - 19 years
Watermain - 19 years
Storm Sewers - 19 years
Streets - 10 years
INTIItEST RATE - 7 9'0
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ASSESSMENT ROLL
� MErmoTa MEanows
SEWERS, WATER, STREETS
JOB NO. 9506, IlVIP. 95-1
ADOPTED: 9-17-96
ASSESSMENT RATES
Utilities -$5,279 per lot
Street - $3,630 per lot
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK UTII,ITES * STREETS TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO.
27-48350- Mendota Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadows 1 1 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
010-01 20 Lake Street N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Box 416 Lot 1, Blk 1, & Interest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 to Common Area Known as Outlots
A&B
27-48350- Mendota Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadows 2 1 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
020-01 20 Lake Street N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Box 416 i.ot 2, Blk 1, & Interest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 to Common Area Known as Outlots
A&B
27-48350- ill M. Svee Mendota Meadows 3 1 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
030-01 838 Monet Court CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Lot 3, Blk 1, & Interest attributable
to Common Area Known as Outlots
A&B
27-48350- Mendota Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadows 4 1 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
040-01 20 Lake Street N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Box 416 Lot 4, Blk 1, & Interest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 to Common Area Known as Outlots
A&B
" Utilities included sanitary sewer, watermain & storm sewer
ASSESSMENT PERIOD
Sanitary Sewers - 19 years
w��� - 14 years
Storm Sewers - 19 years
Streets - 10 years
INTEREST RATE - 7 %
C1TY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ASSESSMENT ROLL
� �rmaTA ��ows
SEWERS, WATER, STREETS
JOB NO. 95Q6, IlYiP. 95-1
ADOPTED: 9-X7-96
�ASSESSMENT RATES
Utilities -$5,2'79 ger Iot
Street - $3,630 per lot
PARCEL REPUTED QWI�IER AND SUBDTYISIQN LOT BLK TJTILITES * STREETS TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO.
27-48350- Lee Ann Haxtert & Judith L. Carneron Mendota Meadows S 1 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
p50-01 834 Monet Court • CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Lot 5, B1k l, & Interest attributabie
to Common Area Knawn as Qutlots
A&B
27-483SQ- Mendota Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadows 6 1 $5,279.00 �3,630.00 $8,909.OQ
Ofi0-01 20 Lake Street N CIC #163 M�ndota Meadows
P.O. Box 416 Lat 6, Blk 1, & Interest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 to Common Area Known as tautlots
A&B
27-48350- Mendota Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadows '7 1 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
Q70-0i 2Q L31ce Street N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Box 416 Lot 7, Blk 1, & Interest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 5SQ25 ta Cammon Area Known as Outlots
A&B
27-48350- Mendata FIomes, Ine. Mendata Meadows $ 1 $5,279.00 �3,630.00 $8,909.00
Q80-01 20 Lake Street N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P,O. Box 416 Lot 8, BIk l, & Interest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 to Common Area Known as Qutlots
A&B
�` Utili#ies inc(uded sanitar wer, watermain & storm sewer 2
ASSESSMENT PERIOD
Sanitary Sewers - 19 years
Watermain - 19 years
Storm Sewers - 19 years
Streets - 10 years
INTEREST RATE - 7 %
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ASSESSMENT ROLL
• MENDOTA MEADOWS
SEWERS, WATER, STREETS
JOB NO. 9506, IlVIP. 95-1
ADOPTED: 9-17-96
ASSESSMENT RATES
Utilities -$5,279 per lot
Street - $3,630 per lot
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK UTILTTES * STREETS TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO.
27-48350- Mendota Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadows 9 1 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
090-01 20 Lake Street N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Box 416 Lot 9, Blk 1, & Interest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 to Common Area Known as Outlots
A&B
27-48350- Mary V. Vauro Mendota Meadows 10 1 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
100-01 824 Monet Court CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Lot 10, Blk 1, & Interest attributable
to Common Area Known as Outlots
A&B
27-48350- Mendota Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadows 11 1 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
110-01 20 I.ake Street N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Box 416 Lot 11, Blk 1, & Interest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 to Common Area Known as Outlots
A&B
27-48350- Mendota Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadows 12 1 �5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
120-01 20 Lake Street N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Box 416 Lot 12, Blk 1, & Interest attributable
Forest L,ake, MN 55025 to Common Area Known as Outlots
A&B
* Utilities included sanitary sewer, watermain S� storm sewer 3
ASSESSNLENT PERIOD
Sanitary Sewerrs - 19 pears
Watermain - 19 years
Storm Sewers - 19 years
Streets - 14 years
IlVT'ER EST RATE - ? �
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ASSESSMENT ROLL
� ��moT.A ��aws
SEWERS, WATER, STREETS
�as Na 9sos, rn�. ss-i
AD4PTED: 9-17-96
�AS�ESSMENT RATES
Utilities -$5,279 per lot
Street - $3,630 per lot
PARCEL REPUTED OVVNER AND SIJBDTVISIUN LUT BLK UTILITES * STREETS T4TAL
NC1. DESCRIPTiON NO. N4.
27-48350- Mendata Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadows 13 1 $5,279.04 $3,630.Q0 $8,909.00
130-01 20 Lake Street N CIC #163 Mendota. Meadows
P.O. Box �16 Lot 13, Blk 1, & Interest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 to Comman Area Known as Qutlots
. ABcB
27-48350- Mendata �Iomes, Inc. Mendata Meadows 14 1 $5,279,{�(} $3,63d.00 $8,909.00
140-01 20 Lake Stseet N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. BoX 416 Iat 14, Blk 1, & Interest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 to Common Area Known as Outlots "
A&B
27-48350- Mendota Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadaws 15 1 $5,279.Q0 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
15Q-01 20 Lake Street N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Bax 416 Lot 15, Bllc 1, & Interest attribntable
Forest Lake, MN 55Q25 to Com�ton Are,� Known as Outlots
A&B
27-48350- Mendata �Iames, Inc. Mendota Meadaws 16 1 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
160-01 20 Iake Skreet N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
PA. Box 416 Lat 16, Blk l, & Interest attributable
Forest L.ake, MN SS025 to Comman Area Known as Chttlots
A&B
'` Utilities inciuded sanitar}� �er, watermain & storm sewer 4
ASSESSMENT PERIOD
Sanitary Sewers - 19 years
Watermain - 19 years
Storm Sewers - 19 years
Streets - 10 years
INTEREST RATE - 7 %
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ASSESSMENT ROLL
� MENDOTA MEADOWS
SEWERS, WATER, STREETS
JOB NO. 9506, IlVIP. 95-1
ADOPTED: 9-17-96
ASSESSMENT RATES
Utilities -$5,279 per lot
Street - $3,630 per lot
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK UTII.ITES * STREETS TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO.
27-48350- Mendota Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadows 17 1 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
170-01 20 Lake Street N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Box 416 I.ot 17, Blk 1, & Interest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 to Common Area Known as Outlots -
A&B
27-48350- Mendota Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadows 18 1 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
180-01 20 L,ake Street N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Box 416 Lot 18, Blk 1, & Interest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 to Common Area Known as Ouflots
A&B
27-48350- Mendota Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadows 19 1 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
190-01 20 I.ake Street N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Box 416 I.ot 19, Blk 1, & Interest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 to Common Area Known as Outlots
A&B
27-48350- Cyntlua P. Schanno Mendota Meadows 20 1 �5,279.00 �3,630.00 $8,909.00
200-01 788 Monet Court CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Lot 20, Blk 1, & Interest attributable
to Common Area Known as Ouflots
A&B
'` Utilities included sanitary sewer, watermain & storm sewer 5
AS�ESSMENT PERIOD
Sanitary Sewers - 19 years
Watermain - l9 years
Storm Sewers - 19 years
Streets - 14 years
INTEREST RATE - 7 °lo
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ASSESSMENT ROLL
• MENDQTA MEADOWS
SEWERS, WATER, STREETS
JOB NQ. 9506, IlV1P. 95-1
AUOPTED: 9»17-96
AS3ESSMENT RATES
Utilities -$5,219 per iat
Street - $3,630 per lot
PARCEL REPIITED QVVNER AND SUBDTVISI4N LUT BLK UTILI'CES * STREETS TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO.
27-48350- oan E, Schanno Mendota Meadows 21 1 $5,279.00 $3,630,00 $8,9Q9.00
210-01 786 Manet Caurt CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Lot 21, Bllc 1, & Interest attributable
to Common Area Known as Outlots
A8cB
27-4835Q- oseph N. & Patricia Perlsolie Menciota Meadaws 22 1 $5,279.d0 $3,630.00 �8,909.00
220-01 784 Manet Court GIC f�163 Mendota Meadows
Mendota Heights, MN 5512Q Lot 22, Blk l, & Intemst aEtributable
to Comman Area Known as Outiots
A&B
27-48350- Gordon & Darothy Heimer Me�ndota Meaciows 23 1 $5,279.OQ $3,630.00 $8,909.00
230-01 1360 Cherry �l[iil Road CIC #163 Menclota Meadows
Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Lot 23, Bllc 1, & 1'nterest attributable
to Common Area Known as Outlots
A&B
2'7-48350- Ann M. Callahan Mendota Meadaws 24 1 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.d0
240-01 'i78 Monet Lane CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
Mendota Heights, MN 5517A Lot 24, Blk l, & Intemst attributa6le
to Comman Area Known as Outlots
A&B
* Utilities inc(uded sanitary �er, watermain & storm sewer � 6
ASSESSMENT PERIOD
Sanitary Sewers - 19 years
wac�� - i9 y�
Storm Sewers - 19 years
Streets - 10 years
INTERFST RATE - 7 %
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ASSESSMENT ROLL
• MENDOTA MEADOWS
SEWERS, WATER, STREETS
JOB NO. 9506, IlVIP. 95-1
ADOPTED: 9-17-96
ASSESSMENT RATES
Utilities -$5,279 per lot
Street - $3,630 per lot
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK UTILITES * STREETS TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO.
27-48350- Mendota Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadows 25 1 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
250-01 20 Lake Street N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Box 416 Lot 25, Bllc 1, & Interest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 to Common Area Known as Outlots
A&B
27-48350- Mendota Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadows 26 1 $5,279.00 �3,630.00 $8,909.00
260-01 20 L,ake Street N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Box 416 I.ot 26, Blk 1, & Interest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 to Common Area Known as Outlots
A&B
27-48350- Albin F. & Patricia A. Mayer Mendota Meadows 1 2 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 �8,909.00
010-OZ 813 Monet Court CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Lot 1, Blk 2, & Interest attributable
to Common Area Known as Outlots
A&B
27-48350- Ann J. Sluely Mendota Meadows 2 2 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
020-OZ % Sally Mullen CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Box 64704 Lot 2, Blk 2, & Interest attributable
St. Pau1, MN 55-164 to Common Area Known as Outlots
A&B
'` Utilities included sanitary sewer, watermain & storm sewer 7
AS�ESSMENT PERIOD
Sanitary Sewexs - 19 years
Watermain - 19 years
Storm Sewers - 19 years
Streets - lU years
INTEREST RATE - 7 %
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
A5SESSMENT ROLL
� MENDUTA MEADOWS
SEWERS, WATER, STREETS
JQB NO. 9506, IlYIP. 95-1
ADOPTED: 9-17-96
ASSESSMENT RATES
Utilities -$5,279 per Iot
Street - $3,630 per lot
PARCEL REPUTED 0�4�!tER AND S�UBDT'VISIQN LUT BLK TJTILrCES * ST'REETS T4TAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO.
27-48350- Mendata Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadaws 3 2 �5,279.00 $3,630.110 $8,909.00
030-02 20 Lalce Street N CIC #163 Mendota. Meadaws
P.O. Box �16 Lot 3, BIk 2, & Interest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 to Common Area Known as Outlots
A&B
27-48350- Mendota Hames, Ine. Mendota Meadows 4 2 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
040-02 20 Lake Street N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Box 416 I,ot 4, Blk 2, & Interest attributable
Forest I,ake, MN 55025 to Common Area Known as Outlots
A&B
27-48350- Mendota Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadaws 5 2 $5,279.OU $3,630.Q0 $8,909.00
050-02 2t} Lake Street N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Box 416 Lot 5, Blk 2, & Interest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 to Cammon Area Known as Qutlots
A&B
27-48350- Mendata �Iomes, Ine, Mendota Mead.ows 6 2 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
060-02 20 I,ake Street N CIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Box 416 Lot 6, Blk 2, & Tnterest attribntable
Forest Lake, MN 55Q25 to Gommon Area Known as Ouklots
A&B
* Utilities inciuded sanitary �er, watermain & storm sewer 8
ASSESSMENT PERIOD
Sanitary Sewers - 19 years
Watemzain - 19 years
Storm Sewers - 19 years
srre�� - la y�
INTEREST R.ATE - '7 �%
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ASSESSMENT ROLL
MENDOTA MEADOWS
SEWERS, WATER, S'TREETS
�os Na. �so�, nvrn. 4�-�
ADOPTED: 9-1'7-96
ASSESSMENT RATES
Utilities -$5,279 per Iot
Street - $3,630 per lot
PARCEL REPUTED Q�+V�TIER AND SUBDi"YISION LUT BLK UTILITES * STREETS TUTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NU. NO.
2"7-48350- Mendota Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadaws 7 2 $5,279.00 $3,630.00 $8,909.00
070-02 20 Lake Street N CIC #163 Mendota M�adows
P.O. Box 416 Lot "I, Blk 2, & Tnterest attributable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 to Common Area Known as Outlots
A&B
2T-48350- Mendota Homes, Inc. Mendota Meadows 8 2 $5,279.00 $3,634.00 $8,909.OQ
080-02 ?A Lake Street N GIC #163 Mendota Meadows
P.O. Box 416 L,ot 1, Blk 1, & Interest attribukable
Forest Lake, MN 55025 ta Gommon Area Known as Outlots
A&B
* Utilities included sanitary sewer, watermain � storm sewer 9
CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS
�:� •.
September 9, 1996
TO: Mayor, City Council and City A���trator
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works D'
SUBJECT: Swanson's 2nd Addition - Public Improvements Assessment Hearing
DISCUSSION:
The public hearing for Swanson's 2nd Addition public hearing was advertised for 8:15
P.M. this evening (see attached memo). Costs for this project are slightly lower than
projected in the feasibility report.
I will be prepared to give a short presentation and/or answer questions concerning this
project at the meeting.
RECOn�IlViENDATION:
I recommend that the assessment roll be adopted as prepared.
ACTION REOUIRED•
Conduct the required public hearing and then if Council desires to implement the
recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 96- , RESOLUTTON
ADOPTIlVG AND COTfFTRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR SA1�iITARY SEWP.R,
WATERMAINS, STORM 5EWER AND STREET IlViPROVEMENTS TO SERVE
SWANSON'S 2ND ADDITION (IlVIPROVIIVIENT NO. 95, PROJECT NO. 2).
C
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
D!�M.Q
August 14, 1996
TO. Niayor, City Council and City Ad��i��Efator
FRQN1: Tom Knuth, Seuior Engineer Technician
SI:B7Z7,CT: Assessment Roll Informafran - Swanson's 2nd A.ddition
7ob No. 9509
Imp. 95-2
Attached is a copy of ttie proposed assessment roll for the Swansons 2nd Addition
pmject as being developed by Bjorkiund Construction. The Bjorklunds pe�itioned for this
project and waived all rights for a public hearing, however, they have now developed a lot, �
and we recommend that a hearing now be conducted. �
• ; • .� : r t� a�� r
The feasibility relwrt for tt�s gmject was presented to Council in April of 1995. This
was a'7 parrel subdivisian with 1 adjoining lot, owned by the Rolfs, also assessed. �
The feasibility r�port estimated the follawing project costs as:
Utilities $129,000
Streets $ 44,000
$ i73,b{}�}
Lstimated per 1vt cast was: $ 21,70{}
�tl� : �� E 1 � h
The final construction casts are $118,U01 plas overhead of $40,ISi (34�} for a total
project cost of $15$,152.00.
Total. per lot assessment for�the $lats ia Swansons Znd Addit�on Proje�t is $19,769.00.
I s .! �,�l�� 1�+1�! 1: y� �.
It is recommended that a public hearing be condut�ed at the September 1'7, 1996 City
Cauncil mee�aing to consider adoptioa of the attached assessment roll.
: 11 � ► s. � Ji� _ /
Review the attached assessment roll, make any changes and then if Council desires to
implement the Staff recommendation, pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 96- ,"Resalution
Calling for Hearing on .Assessment Roll for Swansan 2nd Addition (Improvement No. 95,
Praject 2) Improvements."
�
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESO�UTION NO. 96-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRA�IING ASSESSMENTS
FOR SANI'rARY SEWER, WATE;RMAINS, STORM SEWER AND STREET
� IlVIPROVEMENTS TO 5ERVE SWANSON'S 2ND ADDITION
(IMPROVIIIRF.NT NO. 95, PROJECT NO. 2)
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engi.neer, has calculated
the proper amount to be specially assessed for the costs incurred to date with respect to
Improvement No. 95, Project No. 2 construction of sanitary sewers, watermains, storm sewer
and street improvements to serve the following described properiy situated in the City of
Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly describ�d as follows:
5wanson's 2nd Addition
WHEREAS, the proposed assessment roll has been on file with the Clerk and at all
times since its filing has been open for public inspection; and notice thereof has been duly
published and mailed as required by law. Said notice stated the date, time and place of such
meeting; the general nature of the improvement; the area proposed to be assessed; that the
proposed assessment roll has been on file with the Clerk; and that written or oral objections
thereto by any property owner would be considered; and
WHEREAS, said hearing was held at 8:15 o'clock P.M. or as soon as possible
thereafter, on 7%esda.y, September 17, 1996, at City Hall in the City of Mendota Heights,
Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor announced that the hearing was open for the consideration of
objections, if any, to said proposed assessments; and
WHEItEAS, all persons present were then given an opportunity to present oral
objections, and all written objections theretofore filed with the Clerk were presented and
considered.
NOW THEREFORE, this Council, having heard and considered all objections so
presented, and being fully advised in the premises, and having made all necessary adjustments
and corrections, finds that each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the
proposed assessment roll was and is specially benefited by the construction of said
unprovements in not less thaa the amount of the assessment, as corrected, set opposite the
description of each such lot, piece and parcel of land, respectively, and that such amount so set
out is hereby levied against each of the respective lats, pieces and parcels of land therein des-
cribed;and
BE IT F`URTHTR I�►ESUL�rED, that the proposeci assessment mll is hereby adopted
and canfirmed as the proper special assessment for each of sa"td lots, pieces and pa.iccels of land
respectively, and the assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of seven
percent (7�) per annum accruing on the full amount thereof from time ta time unpaid, shall be
a lien concarreni with general ta�ces upon such parcel and all thereof. The total amount vf
each such assessment as to sanitary sewers, starm sewers, and watermains shall be payable in
equal amounts ext:ending aver a periai of nineteen {l9) years and each assessment as to st�eets,
curb and gutter shall be payable in equal amaunts extending aver a period of ten (10) years;
the first of said inst�t�Iments, together with interest on the entire assessment commencing thirty
(30) da.ys from the date hereof to December 31, 1996, ta be payable with general taxes for the
year i99b, collectible in 1997, and ane af each of the remaining installnaents, together wiih
one year's interest on that and all ather unpaid installments, to be payable with general taxes
for each consecuti�e year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid; and
BE IT FURT�iTR RESOLVED, that prior to Clctober 3, 1996, the owner of any lot,
piece ox parcel of land assessed hereby may at any time gay the whole of such assessment,
without interest ta the City Treasurer; and
BE IT 1�'URTAER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall prepare and transmit ta the
Gounty Auditor a certifY� duglicate of said assessment roll with each then unpaid inst��llment
and interest set forth separately, to be extended upan the proper tax lists of the County, and
the County Auditor shall #hereafter collect said assessments in the manner provided by Iaw.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendoia l3eights tlus 1'7ih day af September,
1996.
• r
� �� r • • �:�
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
. •
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
�
ASSESSMENT PERIOD
Sanitary Sewer -19 years
Watermain -19 years
Storm Sewer -19 years
Streeta - 10 years
INTEREST RATE - 7%
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ASSESSMENT ROLL
SWANSON'S 2ND ADDITION
SEWERS, WATER, STREETS
JOB NO. 9509, IMP. 95 2
ADOPTED: 9-17-96
* Utilitiea include the Sanitary Sewer, Watermain and Storm Sewer
ASSESSMENT RATES
Utilities - �13,2<l9 per lot
Streeta - $6,520 per lot
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK UTILITY STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO.
27-73601- Steffes Inveatmenta Inc. Swanson's 2nd Addition 1 1 $13,249.0� a6,520.00 $19,769.OU
010-01 901 Sibley Highway
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
27-73601- Steffos Investmente Inc. Swanson's 2nd Addition 2 1 �13,249.00 56,520.00 $19,769.00
020-01 901 Sibley Highway
Mondota Heights, MN 55118
27-73601- Steffea Investmenta Inc. Swanson's 2nd Addition 3 1 $13,249.00 a6,520.00 $19,769.00
030-01 901 Sibley Highway
Mendota Heighte, MN 55118
27-73601- Steffes Inveatmenta Inc. Swanson's 2nd Addition 4 1 $13,249.00 a6,520.0U $19,769.00
040-01 901 Sibley Highway
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
27-73601- Steffes Investments Inc. Swanson's 2nd Addition 5 1 $13,249.00 a6,520.00 $19,769.00
050-01 901 Sibley Highway
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
27-73601- Brian J. & Margaret C. Reagan Swanson's 2nd Addition 6 1 �13,249.00 $6,520.00 $19,769.00
060-01 901 Fairmount Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55105
27-73601- Steffes Inveshnenta Inc. Swanson's 2nd Addition 7 1 $13,249.00 $6,520.00 $19,769.00
070-01 901 Sibley Highway
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
27-02700- Mary M. (Tetee) Rolf Section 27 Town 28 Range 23 S 190 ft of $13,249.00 $6,520.00 $19,769.00
041-02 1861 Lo�rington Ave. Soutt► N 899.5 ft of E 684.98 ft of NE 1/4 ex
Mendota Heights, MN 55118 pt platted in Swansons 2nd Addition
�age 1 of 1
a-
r
.
• 1' � • � I:�
1 �1 •
September 9, 19�6
TO: Ma.yor, City Council and City Ad���C�frator ..
FROM: James E. Danielsan, Public Works D' a
SUBJrECT: Ivy Falls South - Public Impravements Assessment Hearing
DISCUSSION:
The public hearing far the Mendota Meadows public iumprovements was advertised for
$:34 P.M. this evening (see attached memo). Costs for this project are slightly lugher than
projected with the feasibility repart because, at the develop�r's request�the bid was awarded
12 � higher than estimated.
I will be prepared ta give a short presentation and/or answer questians concerning this
project.
I recommend that the assessment roll be adapted as prepared.
�'���i�f�� a� �
Canduct the required public he�ring and then if Cauncil desires to implement the
recommendation they should pass a mation adopting Resolutian Na. 96- , RESOLUTTON
ADC}F'TIIVG A,ND CCINFII:tlUIING ASSFSSI�iENTS F4R SANiTARY SEWF.�2,
WATE7.RMAIN5, STORM SFiWER AND STREET IlVIPROVEMLNTS TO SERVE IVY
FALI.S SCyt1TH ADD►ITION {IMPRO�'��vl� NO. 95, PRO7ECT NCt. 3}.
�
' TO:
FROM:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
N�Q
August 14, 1996
Mayor, City Council and City Ad r
Tom Knuth, Senior Engineer �echnician
Assessment Roll Information - Ivy Falls South Addition
7ob No. 9511
Lnp. 95-3
�-�-�Y�X�i�A
Attached is a copy of the pmposed assessment mll for ttie Ivy Falls Soutli project as '
being developed by Mr. Keith Heaver. Mr. Heaver petitioned for this project and waived all
rights for a public hearing, however he has now developed 21ots, and we recommend that a
hearing now be conducted.
: ; � : � 1�11
The feasibility report for this project was presented to Council in 7uly of 1995. This
was a 20 parcel subdivision with 2 parcels not assessed at developers request, as they are not
adjacent to project streets aad utilities and receive no benefit from the project.
The feasibility report estimated the following project costs as:
Utilities
Streets
Esti.mated per lot cost was:
M�I��; ' : � 1 1 k.
$170,000
$ 88,000
$258,000
$ 14,350
The fwal construction costs are $207,818 plus overhead of $64,936 (31 °b) for a total
project cost of $272,754.00.
Final construction costs are slightly higher than estimated because the developer
approved a constzuction contract bid 12 4b lugher than estimated, but actual conshuction costs
were slightly lower than the bid amount by 5�.
Total per lot assessment for the 181ots in ivy Fa1Ls South is $15,153.00.
�
City of Mendota Heighfs
Dakota Caunty, Min��esota
RESQLUTION NQ. 96-
RE54LUTIQN ADOPTING A�ND C4NF�E2�MING .ASSESSIVIENTS
FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAINS, STORM SEWER A1VD STREET
IM(I'ROVIlNJCNTS TQ SERVE NY FALLS SOItTH ADI?ITIUN
(IMPROVEMENT NO. 95, PR.OJECT NO. 3)
BE IT RESOLVF.D by the City Council of the City ai Mendota. Heights as follows:
WI�EREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance af the City Engineer, has calculated
the proper amount to be specially assessed for the costs incurred ta daie with respect to
Improvement No. 95, Project No. 3 construction of sanitary sewers, watermains, storm sewer
and street improvements ta serve the following descnbed property situated in the City of
Mendota Heights, Dakota County, M.irmesota, more particularly described as follows:
Ivy Falls South Addition
WI�REAS, the praposed assessment roll has been on file with the C1erk and at all
times since its filing has been apen for public inspection; and notice thereof has been duly
published and mailed as required by law. Said notice stated the date, time and place of snch
meeting; the general nature of the impmvement; the area proposed to be assessed; that the
propased assessment rall has been on file with the Clerk; and that written ar or�1 objections
thereto by any pmperiy owner would be considered; and
WHTREAS, said hearing was held at 8:30 o'clack P.M. or as soon as possible
theri�after, on 1}uuesday, September 17, 1.996, at City H[a]]. in the City af Mendota Heights,
Minnesota; and
WHI!.REAS, the Mayor announced that the hearing was open for the consideration of
objectians, if any, to said proposed assessments; aud
WSE�itEAS, all persons present were then given an opportunity to present orat
objections, and all written objections theretafore filed with the Clerk were presentecl and
cansidered.
N4W Tl�TY}RE, this Council, having heard and considered all abjections sv
presented, and being fully advised in the premises, and having made all necessary adjustments
and con�c�ans, finds that each of the lots, pieces and pazcels af Iaad enumerated in the
proposed assessment ra11 was and is specially bene�ted by the constructian of said
impmvements in not less tban the amount of the assessment, as corrected, set opposite the
description of each such lot, piece and pazcel of land, respectively, and that such amaunt so set
`
out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein des-
crihed; and
BE IT FIJRTHER RESOLVED, that the proposed assessment roll is hereby adopted
and confirmed as the proger special assessment for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land
respectively, and the assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of seven
percent (7°l0) per annum accruing on the full amount thereof from time to time unpaid, shall be
a lien concunent with general taxes upon such parcel and all thereof. The total amount of
each such assessment as to sanitary sewers, storm sewers, and watermains shall he payable in
equal amounts extending over a period of nineteen (19) years and each assessment as to streets,
curb and gutter shall be payable in equal amounts extending over a period of ten (10) years;
the first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment commencing thirty
(30) da.ys from the date hereof to December 31, 1996, to be payable with general taxes for the
year 1996, collectible in 1997, and one of each of the remaining installments, together with
one year's interest on that and all other unpaid installments, to be payable with general taxes
for each consecutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid; and
BE IT FiJRTHIIt RESOLVED, that prior to October 3, 1996, the owner of any lot,
piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the whole of such assessment,
without interest to the City Treasurer; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall prepare and transmit to the
County Auditor a certified duplicate of said assessment roll with each then unpaid installment
and interest set forth separately, to be eactended upon the proper tax lists of the County, and
the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessments in the manner provided by law.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17th day of September,
1996.
CITY COUNCII.
CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTPST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
ASSESSM�,.. � PERIO�
Sanitary Sewers - 19 years
Watermains - 19 years
Storm Sewers - 19 years
Streets - 10 years
Intez�st Rate 79'0
CITY OF MF.,NDOTA �,EIGiiTS
ASSESSMENT ROLL
IVY FALLS SOUTH
SEWERS, WATER, STREETS
JOB NO. 9511, IlVIP. 95-3
a�or���►: �-��r-ss
AS�ESSMENT RATES:
Utility - $9,241 per lot
Street - $5,912 per Iat
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK UTILITY * STREET TOTAL
NU. DESCRIl'TION N4. NO.
27-31b60- .F. Lagan, Iac. Ivy Falls South Additian 2 1 �9,241.OQ $5,912.00 $15,153.00
020-01 724 1st Avenue •'
Mendota Haights, MN 55118
27-3'7660- .F. Logan, Inc. Ivy Falls South Addition 3 1 $9,241.00 $5,912.00 $15,153.0(?
030-01 724 lst Avenua
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
27-3'7660- .F. Logan, Inc. Ivy Falls Soutb. Addition 4 1 $9,241.00 $5,912.00 $15,153.04
040-01 724 lst Avenue
Men.dota H�ights, MN 55118
27-3'76b0- .F. Lagan, Iac. Ivy Falls South Addition 5 1 $9,241,00 $5,912.Od $IS,1S3.00
050-01 724 lst Avenue
Mendota. �Ieights, MN 55118
*Utilities include, Sanitary Sewers, Watermains, and Storm Sewers ivy Falis �ou#h 1
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVI,SION LOT BLK UTILITY * STREET TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION NO. NO.
2737660- .F. Logan, Inc. Ivy Falls South Addition 6 1 $9,241.00 $5,912.00 $15,153.00
050-01 724 lst Avcnue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
27-37660- .F. Logan, Inc. Ivy Falls South Addition 7 1 $9,241.00 $5,912.00 $15,153.00
070-01 724 lst Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
2737660- Leslie D& James Batterbee Ivy Falls South Addition 8 1 $9,241.00 �5,912.00 $15,153.00
080-01 2258 Fieldstone Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
2737660- Billie L. Logan ivy Falls South Addition 9 1 $9,241.00 $5,912.00 $15,153.00
090-01 724 lst Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
2737660- eaver Design & Construction Inc. Ivy Falls South Addition 10 1 $9,241.00 $5,912.00 $15,153.00
100-01 .F. Logan, Inc. •
875 Mendakota Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-37660- eaver Desiga & Construction Inc. Ivy Falls South Addition 12 1 $9,241.00 $5,912.00 $15,153.00
120-01 .F. Logan, Inc.
875 Mendakota Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-37660- eaver Design & Construction Inc. Ivy Falls South Addition 13 1 $9,241.00 $5,912.00 $15,153.00
130-01 .F. Logan, Inc.
875 Mendakota Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
*Utilities include, Sanitary Sewers. Watermains, and Storm Sewers Ivy F���s South 2
PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDNI,SION LOT BLK UTILITY * STREET TOTAL
NU. DESCRII'TION NO. NO.
27-3'7660- Heaver Design & Constructiozt Inc. Ivy Falls South Addition 14 1 �9,2A�1.00 $5,912.00 $15,153.00
14{}-0I .F. I..agan, Inc.
875 Mendakota Court
Mendata �Ieights, MN SS I20
27-3'7660- Charles M& Nancy L. Tarara Ivy Falls South Addition 15 1 $9,241.OQ $5,922.04 $15, I53.00
150-01 856 Osceloa Ave.
St. Pau1, MN 55105
27-39660- ea.ver Design & Construction Ine. Ivy Falls Soukh Addition 16 1 $9,241.00 $5,912.00 $15,153.00
160-01 Billie Logan
875 Mendakota Court �
Mendota I3eights, MN SSf2{}
27-3'7660- eaver Desiga. & Constxuction Inc. Ivy Fatls South Addition 17 1 $9,241.QQ $5,912.Q4 $I5,153.00
170-01 .F. Logan, Ino.
875 Mendakota Court
Meizdota I�eights, MN 5512Q
27-3?660- .F. Logatit, Inc. Ivy Falls South Addition 18 1 $9,241.00 $5,912.00 $15,153.00
180-01 724 1st Aveaue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
27-3'7660- eaver Design & Constar., Ina � Ivy Falls South Addition 1 2 $9,241.00 $5,912.00 $15,153.00
010-02 87$ Mandakota Coyrt
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-3'7660- eaver Desiga & Constr., Inc. Ivy Falls South Additian � 2 $9,241.00 $5,912.00 $15,153.00
OZt?-02 875 Mendakota Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
*Utili#ies inctude, Sanitary Sewers, Waiermafis, and Storm Sewers tvy FaCls South 3
� 1� 11 • :! :
. August 16, 1996 -
TO: Mayor, Cl� C011IICI�, and City A' t3� � -
FRQM: Marc Mogan M5 M
Ci�il Engineer
5UB3ECT: Bunker �[ills Stre�t Reconstructian Feasibility Report
7ob No. 9514
Improvement No. 9b, Praject No. 3
IN'.['RUDUCTIUN:
The condition of the existing str�ets in the Bunker Hills neighbarhoad are such that
typical preventative maintenance practices no longer provides an acceptable driving surface.
The s1:re�ts in this neighbarhood warrant resurfacing or tutai reconstruction under these
circumstances, in order to restore the street to arn accepta�bly smaoth bituminous suriace.
This feasibility report, which the City ordered by Council Resalation No. 96-44, on
7une 18, 1996, will discuss the pmject background, description, costs, fiinancing, schedule,
and offers a recommendation for the improvement.
BACKGRCIUND:
The streets in Bunker FCills were const�ucted in the early 19�0's. The streets were
constzucted to the City's raral standard of 30 fe�t wide with a 6" gravel base and a 2"
bituminous sar�ace. Durirng the past 25 years, the stirets have been s2owly deteriarating, str�t
s�tions have lost th�ir cmwn, water is ponding in fi�ont of many driveways and the
bituminoos surface is cracking and crumbling. Potholes and deficient street se�tians are
repaired under the yearly street maintenance budget and the curnent frequency and extent af
these repairs suggest that this caurse of action is no Ionger pnident. The normal expe�ted
service Iife far bituminous sf�ets is 20 years, wbich at this time would saggest that a sbreet
recans�.uction pmject far this neighborhood is wananted.
PRt:�JECT DESCRIP'I`ION:
There are appmximately 1.9 miles of streets in the Bunker Hills neighborhaod, which
include Arvin Drive, Hilltup Caurt, Hilltop Road, Ridge Place, Wachtler Boulsvard, Willow
Lane, Valley Curve, and the gravel a11ey between Willow Lane and Hilltop Road west of
Dadd Road, A complete reconstzuctioa project in this neighborhood would be mare
complicated than adding curb and gutter and installing a new bituminous surface. Insl;allation
of B618 concrete curb and gutter might affect existing drainage patterns on private property.
Grading will be required to match the existing grades with the proposed curb. ' Side yards may
need to be regraded to drain backyards effectively. All streets, except for Valley Curve
between Willow Lane and Hilltop Road, and the gravel alley west of Dodd Road would be
reconstructed to meet seven ('� ton capacity pavement section design requirements, constructed
33 feet wide face to face with concrete curb and gutter, and storm sewer where appropriate.
There are no driveways which provide access to properties on the section of Valley
Curve between Willow Lane and Hilltop Road, and therefore I se� no compelling reason to
reconstnuct this section as a street. There are, however, existing sanitary sewer and water lines
constructed within this right of way, and consequently the City will want to have good access
in this area to perform maintenance on these facilities. I therefore propose that the section of
Valley Curve between Willow Lane and Hilltop Road be reconstructed as an 8 foot wide
bituminous trail instead of a street in an effort to reduce the cost of this project.
The existing gravel alley only provides driveway access to the six properties on the
west side of the alley. This alley is not within a public right of way. I would assume that the
six property owners who access their properties from tlus alley would not want it upgraded to
either appear or function as a through street. For the reasons mentioned, I propose that this
alley be paved with bituminous 22 feet wide with an inverted crown (without concrete curb
and gutter). The inverted cmwn in this design section would convey iunoff down the center of
the alley, where it would discharge to either a catch basin connected to the storm sewer
system, or the concrete gutter where the alley joins the street.
Staff received a letter fmm Steven and Terne Marks of 745 Hilltop Road regarding
safety concerns at the intersection of Hilltop Road and Dodd Road (see attached). One of the
points made in this letter was the possibility of eliminating the Hilltop Road connection to
Dodd Road. There could be some merit in this proposition for a number of reasons, and
Council may want to direct staff to investigate this further.
The installation of curb and gutter on this pmject necessitates constzuction of storm
sewer to effectively route storm water iunoff off-site. There are severallocations in the
Bunker Hills neighborhood where storm water presently drains to some existing storm sewer
catch basins or culverts. The existing storm sewer conduits would be utilized and incorporated
into the desiga of the proposed storm sewer system design wherever possible and appropriate
in aa effort to reduce cost, and minimi�p storm sewer consttuction impacts.
An effective way of rebuilding streets to achieve a greater design strength is to reclaim
the existing bituminous surface and incoiporate the reclaimed bituminous as part of the base
material. This method has been used with good success on the London/Downing, Friendly
Hills and Curley's Valley View Street reconstcuction projects, aad would be used on this
project. Consttuction would commence with reclamatioa of the existing bituminous surface
that would be crushed for use as a recycled aggregate base for this improvement project.
Storm sewer pipes would be constiucted in accordance with the storm sewer system design.
F.xisting ditches and driveway culverts would be eliminated. Inadequate street subgrade
`
canditions would be repaired. Drain tile would be installed, where necessary and feasible, to
provide a stable subgrade for streei constniction. Additianal aggregate base wauld be placed
as required. Concrete curb and gutter would be constructed, fallowed by the canstruction of
two lifts of bituminous surface. Driveways wauld be reconstiucted in kind, to the e�ctent they
were disturbed. Boulevards would be fuushed giaded and restored. with seed or sod.
PR.O.TECT COSTS:
A summary of the preliminazy estimated groject casts including contingencies,
engineering, administration, and overhead for the proposed improvement are as follows:
Item Description
Watermaiui
Stonn Sewer
City Standar�d Streets
�oT�r., �o�cT cosT
PRO.TECT FTNANCIl�TG:
Project Cost
Tiiis project wouid be fi�nanced fmm a combination of special assessmenis,
Infrastructure Reserve, and Water Utility Funfls.
in 1992, City Council adopted the Straet Rehabilitatioa and Reconstruction Policy.
This policy encourages the upgrading of rural sf�et s�ectians to City Standard Streets. The
palicy also makes funds available from various City funding sour�es to aid in the cost of
certain sireet reconstructaiion pmjects.
The City St�reet Rehabilitation aad Reconstruction policy states that the City wilI
fmance up to 5Q percent (505b) of the total project cost for a project to upgrade and reconstruct
streets that meet the reqairements for City Standard Streets. That same policy indicates that
benefiteti praperties should be assessed the entire cost of the upgrade or capital impravement
(i.e., storm sewer and concmmtee curb and gutter).
This project pmpases ta deviate firom this funding policy in a manner consistent with
the other stre�t reconstn�ction improvement prajer,ts which have recently �n constcucted in
the City. On the other projects, after dedacting all passible Water Utility, 'I�, or Municipal
State Aid {MSA} funding contributions, the City funded 54 percent {50°b} of all pnoject costs
fmm the Infrastiucture Tt�serve Fund that would otherwise be assessed against benefiting
pmperties. The same funding appmach is being recommended to finance the cost of these
improvements. Under this pmposal, the property owner would be assessed one half of the cost
of the proposed improvement praject with matcbing City TnfiasCructure Reserve funds after
deducting all contributions fmm other possible City funding soarces.
�
I propose that all incidental watermain related construction costs be fmanced out of the
Water Utility Fund.
The lots in this neighborhood are large. Compounding this situation is the relatively
inefficient platting of the lots themselves. Evidence of this is exhibited by the significant
number of through lots, and the combined length of corner lot frontage. Given these
circumstances, I am proposing that the City offer assistance in this regard, by arbitrarily
adding another unit assessment to the total number of assessable units for each through lot in
this neighborhood (six additional). Any lots which are currently vacant, would be included in
the total number of assessable lots for the determination of the per lot cost, but could have the
assessments deferred until such time as the properiy is developed.
There are 74 assessable residential lots within the project. Adding the 6 through lots
whose assessments would be funded by the City increases the total number of assessable lots to
80. All assessable pmperties within the improvement project, including the six properties
which front the alley, would be assessed 50 percent of the remaining improvement costs on a
per lot basis. The properties wluch front the alley will �enefit from this improvement project,
but not to the extent of the other properties. For this reason, I propose that these six properiy
owners pay only that portion of the assessment cost attributable to construction of the alley,
including a proportionate share of the indirect cost, with the remaining balance of the per lot
unit assessment being paid by the City. Based on the funding plan as described, the proposed
total assessment per residential lot, (including two privately owned vacant lots, and six City
subsidized through lots) is: $776,000 :- 801ots =$g,700 per lot. The proposed total
assessment per pmperiy owner is: $9,700 x 50°b =$4,850 per 1ot.
This pmject as it is currently pmposed is expensive, and results in the highest proposed
per lot assessment to date for aay street reconst�uction pmject undertaken in the City.
As was mentioned earlier, this is the case primarily as a result of lot density and the inefficient
platting of the properiy in the neighborhood. As a matter of comparison, the Bunker Hills
neighborhood as it currently exists has 20 � more lineal feet of street centerline, and 25 %
fewer assessable properties thaa the Curley's Valley View Addition neighborhood.
Based on the above criteria, the proposed impmvement funding amounts are as follows:
Citv Standard Street I+�unding Saurce:
Water Utility:
Infrasttucture Reserve Fund:
Special Assessment:
TOTAL PROJECT:
�unding Amount
$12,000.00
$421,900.00
$354,100.00
$788,OQ0.00
�
PRO.TECT SCHEDULE:
It is anticipated that the entire improvement cauld be substantially completed duriz�g the
1997 construc�ian season if the project is ordared and approved in a timely manner. Following
is a tentative schedule of target dates for the pmposed impmvement praject.
Task Time "
Public Hearing September 17, 199b
Field Survey Oct,ober - I3�cember 1996
Design November 1996 - January.1997
Bid February 1997
Construct May - October 1997
Assess October 1997
PRO.TECT INITIAT14N:
The pmpased improvement project was brought before the City Cauncil by a peiition
of less than 35 percent (3S �) of the total assessable frontage of property owners in the Bunker
Hills neighborhood, and the�fore, Minnesota State Stahie Chapter 429, "Local
Impmvements,. Speci�al Assessments" stipulates that a four-fifths majonty will be required if
the City Gonncil is to order this pmpased public improvement,
; ! ��1►s��.l! : Y f .
The Bunker F[ills street reconstcuction pmject is feasible from a technical and T
econamic standpaint, and can be acccymplished independent of any ofiher impmvement pmject
as proposed. T'hi.s project, as it is currently proposed, is expensive for all the reasons
mentioned, and results in the highest praposed per 2ot assessment to date for any street
reconstruction project undertaken in the City. I will be in attendance at the Council me+eting to
discuss this repart and answer any questions. i recommend that Council be prepared to accept
the feasibility repart as presented ar aznend it as necessary, consider using passible atternative
City funding sources to incre�ase the City cost participatian to" help reduce the per lot
assessments, and pmc�d with the pmposed improvement project by halding the mandatory
public hearing an September 17, 1996.
��� ; �i � a� �
If Cauncil desires to implement the recammendation, they should pass a motion
adogting Resolutian No. 96- , RESOLTJTION ACCEPTING ENGIN7 �+ R'S
FEASIBILITY REPORT � CALLIlYG FOR A PUBLIC HEARING F{?R STZtEET
RECONSTR'(J'CTI4N AND RGHABILITATIUN Il��IPRUY.QYff�!'�1TS TC! SERVE THE
ARI.�,,A RF:FFRRED TQ AS BUNKF,1t HII.LS INCLUDING PR4PERTZES IN
RIDGEWQOD FARK, 5QMF..RSET HII.LS, SOMJfjRSET ffiLLS NO. 2,
SPRING CREEK ACI7:ES, AND VALLEY C:URVE ESTATES {JOB NO. 9514,
IlVII'ROVIlI�,NT NQ. 9b, PROJECT NO. 3}.
`
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT A1VD
CALLING FOR HEARIl�TG ON PROPOSID STREET RECONSTRUCTION
AND REHABILITATION IlVIPROVIIVIIIVTS TO SERVE
T$E AREA RF,Fr.RRF,n TO AS BUNI�R H�L5
INCLUDING PROPERTIES IN
RIDGEWOOD PARK, SOMERSET HILLS, SOMIItSET HII..I.S NO. 2;
SPRING CREEK ACRES, AND VALLEY CURVE ESTATES
(IlVIPRO`'IIVIENT NO. 96, PROJECT NO. 3)
WHEREAS, the City P.ngineer has submitted his report to the City Council with respe�t to the
proposed reconshuction and rehabilitation of streets in Bunker Hills, to-wit:
The construction of street improvements consisting of the acquisition of easements and
the grading, stabilization, drainage and bituminous surfacing, construction of concrete
curbs and gutters and storm pipes on the streets to be situated in the area hereinafter
more particularly described.
WHEREAS, the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is situated within the
City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota, and is more particularly described as
follows:
Those parcels abutting Arvin Drive, the alley between Willow Lane and Hilltop Road
west of Dodd Road, Hilltop Court, Hilltop Road, Ridge Place, Valley Curve,
Wachtler Lane, and Willow Lane.
WHEREAS, ia said report said City F.ngineer reported that the proposed improvements and
construction thereof were technically and economically feasible, and desuable, and further
reported on the proposed costs of said improvements.
NOW T�REFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVID by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows:
1. That the report of said City Engineer be and is hereby received.
2. That a public hearing on said impmvements be held on Tuesday, September, 17 1996
at 7:45 o'clock P.M. or as soon as possible thereafter, at the Mendota Heights City
Hall 1101 Victoria Curve in the City of Mendota Heights.
3. Tbat the Gity Clerk, with the aid and assistance of the City Attorney, be and is hereby
authorized and dir�cted to pregare a notice of said hearing and to cause said nofice to
be published and mailed to the owners of the pmperiy s�tuated within said ama, a11 in
accordauce with applicable bsinnesota Statutes.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota IIei,ghts this 2Qth day of August, 1996.
� �
! i' � � � 1:�4 '
8y
Chazles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
� rM'.`�i
Kath%en 1VI. Swanson
City Clerk
August 9, 1996
Dear Mr Danielson,
I am requesting your attention regarding the safety conditions adjacent to
our property at Hilltop & Dodd Road. My concern is for the safety of our child,
the chiidren in xhe neighborhoods along Dodd Road and the risk to motorists. .
As more new housing and young families have populated the areas along Dodd�
Road, I feel it would be prudent for the City. of Mendota Heights to lower the
speed limit on Dodd Road North of Hwy 1 10 to 30MPH. Currently the speed limit
is 30MPH as you drive South of Doddway Center, increases to 35MPH once you
pass Somerset Elementary School and then to 40MPH at Wentworth. �s vehicles
can never travel more than about 4/�10's of a mile before reaching a stop sign
or a stoplight, lowerin the speed limit should have a negligible effect on the
overall flow of traffic�Traveling from South to North, the existing 44MPH �
speed limit lessens the likelihood of traffic actually slovring to the posted
30MPH before reaching the gradeschool area.
Of greatest concern to me personally is the safety of our 4 year old son and -
the dangerous conditions at the corner of Hilitop Road & Dodd Road. Because of �
the hill and curve on Dodd Road there is extremely poor visibility between
Willow Road & Hilltop Road and vehicles traveling North to South at 40MPH .
would have little time to react if our child, or a neighbor's child, were to walk,
run or ride a bike onto Dodd Ro�d. Additionally, it is very difficult to access
Dodd Road by car from Hilitop Road and almost impossible during a slippery
winter day. i have witnessed many vehicles running the stopsign so as to avoid
getting stuck at the top of Hilltop Road. Because of these conditions i am also
asking that the city act in one of two ways. 1) Place a stop sign on the North &
South direction of Dodd Road at Hilitop Road. 2) Ciose traffic access to Hiiltop
Road from Oodd Road. This wouid require only a few households to slightly
reroute as there are two other roads that access Dodd Road, one block North of
Hilltop and one block South as well as access to Marie Ave at Wachler. The
fourth access at Hilltop is very unsafe and does not seem necessary to serve
the relatively smail number of homes in the area.
f look forward to talking with you concerning this problem and I am asking
for your heip in addressing these safety concerns before a serious accident -
occurs. Thank you for your time and consideration.
�,
Steven & Terre Markes ,
�) C.iti�.�..- /7�� G�' .
745 Hi 11 top Road
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
H)683-9713 W)552-2603
�
�
�N _
o� ��
---�.
I.EGEND -
�►-- PROPOSED ST�ORM SEWF.'R PIPE
� a—�i-- �STII�TG STORM SER'EIt PIPE
ERTSTIIQGBIIVMINiOIIS STREET •
r•
- – F.R�TIIdG GRAVLZ ALLEY
. +
. ' t
ITI,�71:�t�/ �
e
C
•• I
_ - /
v'•
' � BiTNKER HII,LS STREET RECONSTRIICZTON '
irLA,S'IBIL1Ti' REPORT �
JOS PiO. 9514 II4IPROVII1�dVT NO. 963
DRtiWN BY JDS - DA.� 8/!4/96
Y =�
�.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
f,......_ September 12, 1996
T4: Mayor, City Council, and City A��� tar
FROM: Marc S. Mogan MSM
Civi1 Engineer
SUBJECT: Bunker I�[ills Street Recanstruction Camment Ugdate
DISCUSSION:
A feasibility report was presented and accepted by Councii for the Bunker Hills
Street Reconstructian project at the August 20, 1996 Council meeting. Please have that
report available for reference at the September 17, 1996 pnblic hearing. If you need a
copy of that repart, please contact me. I will be available to make a presentation and
answer questians at the upcomi.rng public hearing.
Staff has received written correspondence (see attached), and had canversations
with some residents in the neighborhaod regarding this impmvement project,
� f t �� E _ �
I recommend that City Counc�l consider all written and verbal public comment
presented relative ta the improvement project at the upcoming public hearing and
deter�mine a course of action,
ACTION A:EQUIREI}•
Coune� should be prepamd to caniinue ar close the upcaming scheduled public
hearing, and determine a course of action. If Cauncil desires to proceed with the
improvement project upon conclusion of the public hearing after cansidering all the
infarmation presented, they shanld pass a motion adopting Resalution No. 96 ,
P:FSOLUTION AGCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPURT, ORDF:RING
IlVZPROVEML+'NT AND I"REPARATI4N OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO
SERVE THE AREA REFERI2ED TO AS BU,NKEl� ffiLLS INCLUDING
PR.ClPER.TIES IN RIDGEWQOD PARK, S4MEILSET HILLS, SUMEItSET
ffiLLS NO. 2, SPRING CP.EEK ACRE�+, AND VALLEY CURVE ESTATES
(JOB NU. 9514, Il1�IPROV'EMENT NO. 96, PROJECT NO. 31.
�
Ronald J. Coulter
828 Hilltop Road
St. Paul, MN 55118
612-454-3837
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendo#a Heights, MN 55118
Deaz City of Mendota. Heights,
�' �"'�
ri •
�-
.
i-.�� � +�':
� ��
I will be at a prior function during the City Council hearing on September 17 concerning the street reconshuction project. I
would like to take the opportunity in this letter to express my support for the reconstruction of the streets. Their current condition is
a disgrace to our neighborhood. We truly have some of the worst streets anyplace around, and their condition reflects poorly on the
city and on our neigtiborhood.
In negards to reconstructing them in the "City Stanrlard" rather than the old "Rural Standard," I think it is important tbat our
neighborhood follow the pattem of the other neighborhoods in having the curbs. Those people in the neigborhood that line. their
boulevards with ugly concrete blocks to keep the city plows from gouging the grass along the street will be able to dispeiise with
such a practice, lea.ving things loo�ng much neater. One has only to drive by the neighborhoods that have their new streets to see
how nice they look with the curbs and new pavement, and compare it to our potholed strcets with the few remnants of cheap
blacktop mounding that passed for curbs years ago to see what an enhancement the new project would be both to the appearance o:�
the neighborhhood and to the value of our individual properties. Those few that are afia.id of change or the cost will come to realize
once the project is finished that the right decision has been made when they see the nice new streets with the attractive curbs.
Sincerely,
%���� .
Ronald J. Co r
September 9, 1996
�r :
`
TJ
BfN BAYLE�S
' 821 Hi!ltop Rd.
Mendota Nqta.� !N», bbll8 �
� ,,.1
� r y
�>-z=r° .��.�-:----.
R�c.:n �t- to -� b
�'`� �^ � 1 ' �--�,� /"
_._...c'_ ....."'". .... _. ._.�..-,i'���i����%�'�._. ._/ ���iG+..
�___,__-- .___.... --- --._..._._ _..__.
r ��*h"e
:t._
��,,�,4G, s-..�/��"�. __. --
r �
����P ����
������
U-�.. G�.�_�� �
„ r d .
�'�'¢
, / , , ; ,
r � i � ,i � �
.' i / � j
, � _
._
/ � ,r � .
r ! i�
i� ,, ' ,�►'
,
,
+II� � ..+ r �
r `� ,
I�� � r � ,'
/ �
� � � �
' �•� i
,� i / � �
� �
� i � r � � ` ..w�
/ / ' , i
�� � / i ,r, � / �� '�r , / / �� �
f � � r
i
i
��a /` ' "'� � / „�I , � � �
��ri �,�+ i. �i � � � � � % �
/ .�a�iY �"..w/ .! �'
! i
i / / i / � �— I� � � i `
� i ,,,w• w � ... . �
r ,
� � f�/ 1� i, % �/ � i � f
� � /
/ � � - ' .s ,;i"E , ! - . : r � '
J; / � ' �
`// �j� _ / i /
.�
.
I 'r / � , � � I'",�„ '�r,. � . �' �,.
' - . .. f
/ � ' � ..c�+ � �' " � -''`"'� � ; ,.
� � �.
r�
r � ' ��' .rG � � i i� � f � . „ �/
i
� � / r
. ,;- �' - � ' �- !.. .. , ,� r
� r r i �, � ,. /
�L�� ..
. r
.}';r.'
f:.
�''� .
:;�;:
. - - - " . . ' � �-. . ___ _ .. "�., -
':1.. . +}.•�.
r —
— 'a-�.
' ,::; :
`,:::� ` —
�'G � .f/•'.•:.
l:'�' - �
� �iy�.�_ �i'"
'.'f• � .!='� w`::
^+�.� ��`.i � _
,`n. .'•u . - '�:ve .
.:r:l"
. .1%-' yn. �
. . . -y'
. �`'� .,\`'a ',if:`
.. ,i�. •'w�`� .s.• 'i+',�''•� ' .a:,�i�:i ,p..'::i::`i•:.�
••K'r� r'}+:� ^ t
. ..Y. 'A' T{!`"'
%f `'.1'.af - ���Y
. r'.�.: ,
. ..5. i.V•��' . �C
�L'.
- . �;`'�::��: ii�
� 1. :j.:.r.
. 1 1w f
. . . �'v'•�" . Y
. . P
. � ti':•^ +t
.. � 'i•". . . -.ii." {}'
.. .:i�� .�:�. ..4 t }
. . . .x. '•`l. -a
. — . . •..t 2'tii�
lY.
.... . .. . . `.�i
. . .,•� , �.
. . . . . . t
. . _ . . :�.,r_.....-
. . . .. ..�.'ti ..
-. . . .. . .:. , . , -. .- . =j(
. .. . . . . ; , ` .
� � �. i. . � . ...-�- •- � •- -� . : ....._; ..._._ - �• — .: -.... _ . . . ; . . 1 . • ' .. . . � .a _. ... '�� - . ..
' � � � I � � i � ; ! � I ; j � . , � , i � ; I I � I
` � � � ' i ( � ! � i i � . i � ; � � , � . ;
; ' ' � I � � � ; i . . • � • , ; ; ' � �
� � � � � i ; ' ` , ; • : . ' ! • ;
` I� I j � , '.': I �. i i �
� � i ' ' � ' � ` � I � i
� � i �' I i i �� I; �
� � � I � �. ; I � I �
, � ! � , � � � ! � ! � I . I �
, , � , , ! ; � � . . . . � �
i i � I ( �i i , i , � I , ; . ; `•
i i � I �! i � ; � ; , , � , � . � ; ; ; ;
I � ( � ! i ! i � � 1 i
j ! � � . � � � y' � � � ' � . � . � � ! .
� � � i I � : � i , � , �
I � j i � � I � � � , � � , i : I ' ; ' � I .
' , .
� � I j� � �. i � � i t ( I'� � I( I�
. �� � ,�., �, !,
� , � � �� j�) �; � � , � ; ; : i � ; ; � ; j ;
,
� . � ; ! . � � � � � , . i
( ( � ! i I , ? , . , , • . , ; :
( `� ! , � � Ni i , i � �
� �I I i I �i � �, . . � ; i : � ; � i
` I � � � I� � �j � 1; � � � , ; ' ; I
� ' � �� � I�I ��I i i ?; � I I; ! j;!! � �
�• � i � ! � I i �
��� �
. �
I� � �
,
_ :! li� �K . , tl
�
� ��; ; , � �
�:�:
�� � �
i � i ; . � � i
' ' ' i
� � , , . .
� �
� ; ; ; � � � �
I � i ! . i
� j ; , ' I
I � � , ,
I .
� � ; ,
' ' i � �
I I � !
� I i i i
i
�
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 96 -
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT,
ORDERING IlVIPROVII�RENT AND PREPARATION OF
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET RECONSTRUCTION
AND REHABILITATION IlVIPROVEMENTS TO SERVE
THE AREA RF.FT.RRF.n TO AS BUNKER H�LS
INCLUDING PROPERTIES IN
RIDGEWOOD PARB, SOMERSET HILLS, SOMERSET HILIS NO. 2,
SPRING CREEB ACRES, AND VALLEY CURVE ESTATES
(JOB NO. 9514, IlVIPROVEMENT NO. 96, PROJECT NO. 3)
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 17th day of September, 1996, at 8:45
o'clock P.M, or as soon as possible thereafter, in the City Hall of the City of Mendota. Heights,
Minnesota pursuant to resolution duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights on the question of the proposed construction of the following described improvements:
The constiuction of street improvements consisting of the acquisition of easements and the
grading, stabilization, drainage and bituminous surfacing, construction of concrete curbs
and gutters and storm pipes on the streets to be situated in the area hereinafter more
particularly described.
WHEREAS, due publication of the notice of public hearing on said proposed construction
has been attended to; and
�� , mailed notice of said hearing has been mailed more than 10 days before the
date of said hearing to the owners of each parcel situated within the area proposed to be assessed,
all in accordance with the applicable Mi.nnesota Statutes, and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer reported that the proposed improvement and construction
thereof were economically feasible, desirable and further reported on the proposed costs of said
improvements and consiruction thereof; and
WHEREAS, the area proposed to be assessed for said irnprovements is situated within the
City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota and is more parkicularly described as
follows:
Those pazcels abutting Arvin Drive, Hilltop Court, Hilltop Road, Ridge Place, Wachtler
Avenue, Willow Lane, Valley Curve, and the gravel alley between Willow Lane and
Iiilltop Road west of Dodd Road.
WHEREAS, the City Council then proceeded to hear all persons interested in said
improvement and all persons were afforded an opporiunity to present their views and objections
to the making of said improvements.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows:
1. That the feasibility report for the above described improvements is hereby
accepted.
2. That it is advisable, economically feasible, exped.ient, and necessary that
the City of Mendota Heights construct the above described improvements,
and it is hereby ordered that said improvement be made.
3. That the City Engineer be and he is hereby authorized and directed to
prepare plans and specifications for said improvement.
4. That said improvement shall hereafter be known and designated as
Improvement No. 96, Project No. 3.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17th day of September, 1996.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF N�NDOTA I�IGHTS
:
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
� 1 f � • :1 :
MEMO
September 12, 19�6
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Ad 's or
FROM: Patrick C. Hollister, Administrative Intern
SITBJECT: Building Permit for Manna Freight
Discussion
Mr. Criesen, representing 1VIanna Freight, attended the 7une 4, 199b meeting of the Ciiy
Council to discuss their plans for a warehouse on Enterprise Drive immediately east of
BDS.
The Council voted to grant a Foundation Permit and Concept Approval for the size,
locatian, and shape of the building presented in the application, subject to the following:
1. The submission of an improved landscape plan
2. The submission of an improved building design featuring mare architectural detail on
the office portzon of the buiiding
The Coizncii atso found that the ea�ternal iadder accessing the roof of the warehouse was
unsightly from the street. The Council requested that the applica.nt find an alternative
arrangement ta access ihe warehouse roaf. (Staff has since determined that although cade
requires such a ladder, it does not have to be on the autside of the building.) Mr. Giesen
has since submitted the attached materiats to address the Councii's concerns.
Piease see also the attached Ietter dated August 2I, 1996 from United Properties to Mr.
Alan Meehan of Manna Freight. This letter cantains United Properties' camments about
the building and indicates their preliminary approvai af the project.
At the request of Uruted Properties, Manna Freight has moved their sign from the side of
the building and now proposes a manument sign set back 20' from the property line. This
sign a,rrangement conforms to United Properties sign policy. While the City's Zaning
Ordinance requires a 40' setback in the industrial zone, the 20' setback variance in similar
cases has been routine and the Council may v�r�sh to either grant a sign variance outright or
postpone approval of the sign to a later date to allow for Planning Commissian review.
Staff also wishes to note that the proposed north access road is currently shown on
Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan C-1 to be only 3 feet above the water main. The
road should be at least 7% feet above the water main if they are to intersect, in order to
avoid problems with freezing. Staff has advised Giesen Construction to correct this
problem on their site plan, and they have indicated that they are willing to implement one
or more of the options listed below.
Attached are the following documents:
1. A Letter of Intent from Giesen Construction, Inc.
2. A letter dated August 21, 1996 from United Properties to Manna Freight granting
preliminary approval of their plans
3. Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan (C-1)
4. Landscape Plan
5. Site Plan (A-1)
6. Architectural Plan (A-2)
7. North and South Elevations (A-4) �
8. East and West Elevations (A-5)
9. Misc. Elevations (A-6)
Recommendation
Staffrecommends that the Council either table discussion of this application until the
applicant submits a site plan without a conflict between the north access road and the
water main or authorize the issuance of a building permit for the proposal as presented,
subject to the following:
1. compliance with a11 applicable City building, fire, and noise attenuation code
requirements
2. Rectification of the conflict between the north access road and the water main by one
or more of the following means, in order to guazantee that the road will be at least 7%
feet above the water main at any point where they may intersect:
• Relocating the road so that it does not intersect with the water main
• Raising the road by at least 4'/z feet at all points of intersection with the water main
• Lowering the water main by at least 4'/z feet at all points of intersection with the road
Council Action Required
If the Council desires to approve the application, the Council should deternune a course of
action on the 20' setback variance for the building ID sign and the water main issue and
then pass a motion authorizing the issuance of a building permit subject to the above
stated conditions. �
� . ���.SEN CC)NSTRIJ�T'ION �� INC. � ". � , - ' (�12) 953-9741 .
, , -1 .� , . � FAX. (612) 953-9743
� � � 1 QQO East 146th Street, #215 ` • � � � ' •� • � � �
� . . � . � Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 � � ; � , � . � . . , . � , .. ' t : � . . . • , . . �
. . � .. . , , • • .. ,. , .
. � , . . , '��. � .- . , . . . . -
' ; . � ' ' ,. _ . ' ' . . , . � r - : . � ;.., ' � . • . . 'i;�. ���, , ; ` '� . , _ . � , '
� � City of Mendota Heights . ' � , ° . . , � ' � • . '. • ' . . �. .' � " . .
r � Atten: Patrick C.'Hollister � � ' . ' �' � , ' � ' '� � � � ' . � � � �
� � 1 I01 Victoria Curve . ; , . ' , . . � . . � , , .. : . ., , ' . • ; : . ..
, Mendota Heights, MN 55118 , . ; , . . . , . , . , , . . �
. . RE: MA:NNA FREIGHT . . .' . : ' . . ' ' : < . . ' • � ' . . ; , � .
. . . . �. . . � , . _ . . . .
r . T � r • � • ' � . •F , 'y . �t. . •1.�� " . . • .
' ` ' . Dear Mr. Hollister, . . .. , ; . ; :. ,.� , , .. , . � � . '. • ' . ..' . ' � ,' � . , ; `
. � • . � . . " . ir.�,; i ° ..•:.•,.;:,. '.. �"; i,.•'.,'..'� :�i, ',. , • : . ' " .
� , Enclosed, please find fifteen (15) sets ofthe inforniation�you requested for the September, l'7, � ,"-
• , 3996 Cauncil meeting. -. , � • .. ' � . , ' . .' . : .. , +'. . a: '. � .. . . � .
' � Manna'Frei twill"canstruct~a25 200sfbuildin `ofwhich�6,I20sfisYo#fice�arid 19,080sfis • �, � . �
� .� : . � ,
, �warehouse. � The building will be located on,Enferprise"]7rive :and used. as�an air freight� forwarding ��
. �
' facility. The building`will be built�on tiie�western enii of't�e 3.33,acre �ite'which,allaws�adequate ',. �
. , ' � space for e�rpansion ta twice its �original size.' Const�ructio�:is schecluled �to sta.rt'early .Spring and , � : ' , '
;.- . , ;., � . .
� , . to be�completed in four (4} months: �-`, } �� � , � ;' � . , � . ... � ' ' � � . � : ' . � .
, . . . . . , . . �� �� � , � �,. � . . � , , � .
�,: AtI enclosed submittats have been1appra�ed by�United Properties. Final plans will,be submitted.to _ �,�
: ,., . . .
� ' _� .the City for pemut application in agproximately�sixty�{60}.days.:�' • . � � , , . , .
. . . .. � . , • �,. � . � .. `, , . . . ' , `, . � . . , '� ' . . ' . � , ' , . ^ . • . "� • • - .
Resp futtCy submitted,� � � - . � _�; : ' � : ` : . . . . - := ' ' .. . .. . . .
� � ' ; ; ; � ,:�� , :; .� �;:.:� . �,_ ` - ', ' ,, .. . .. ; '. � „ , , . .
. ' , < . . � r � . �ti f,4' ;� ..' ' .,` r' , � . �- .
' � • . �: � '. . . . � •, . , ., . . : ;,' . . , •' � � , ' ' . ,
� Randy M. Giesen� � - - . , • •. . . ',' . .. � , , ,:;:� _ , { : . . .. , • , .
. - ,,,t.�. ' ,, �� :�;
President � � , , - .. . � • .- . . � . � - � , ::. � _ .. .. , � .. , , �• . � • � ' .
" � ' . : ' � • � . . � . r � � , � '�;.: . '•; 'i. � '` "' • , •• .' . � , , , ..
:. . � Enc: 15 � • • -' . � • ` ' ' ' �=�' ; ` . : j ; . . .. , .� . ' . . , , .
. , � , . . ,. � � ' 'r; , . �.��i'1" �4 "t• � . 1 • ,
. . , ' . . . " , 4,. . ;, � , . , . , . ,
- • ' � • ' . ,. , .� ' .}� " ' . . ,. . . , .
" ' ' . • _ " , ' , ` + , .:•'�t ` rf ,'.;` 'Y�j - ' ,.`" � , : ' ' . ..', `_ •
t • . � . � . _ . . ;a ' ' t.: . � ' . , •
` , ' � ..� � ' .. , . r � ' . ..�1 ,,'',� ��, '.k�` ,'i.,!.� � „� � . . � '
� • ' r . ~ ', . > r . .i .. , • '� {,Y � . , � ' j ' „ � .+ /
- . �. . ; � . n l..' � , it . , .� _ . i
' � , .' ' ', � • ` . . . _ „ ' . ` n� ' ', ,. � _ . j .
� ' • • • . '• ' `� .•�,tu`.. � ', �.'S�Y�,. • j., t Ff,.' i. 1•, .�, ,• �t,r, � ' ," � ` '� , '• � •I • . , •
Y�� . . . .. . , � t•i, .,. '��.�M1` .+` �.r�'��' �� 1 . . ' � . ,. � . , � �
• ` • , i � :A.��,� 1'. i ,• . • .
' • , • I , * *. 1 ` .•1, ,2,•• ^;, ••'' � � '• F • i �'�. � , iA ~ � 1, ..' . : .t Y • .
• : . • . .. : .. , , .. .. . 1 `t� ; " . ' . ` . .. `i. `', � - .
. � . • ' � , .., , � . . � . � . , • .��; . ., ' . . .
. . . . " , , � � . � An�Equafi 4pportunity Emplayer = '. ,� � . . , � � ,
� �
�
� UNITED PROPERTIES
August 21, 1996
Mr. Alan J. Meehan
Manna Freight Systems, Inc:
909 Apollo Road
Eagan, MN 55121
RE: PLAN REVIEW — MANNA FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC.
MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS PARK
Dear Mr. Meehan:
i
The �following comments are made regarding the plans you submitted for our review and
approval. These comments, for the most part, were reviewed with you by Brian Magham and
myself on several occasions over the telephone and by hand written comments on plans you
submitted. The comments on these plans were made by Dale Glowa and myself, copies of which
you were provided.
A. SITE PLAN
y
1. The landscape plan as prepared and revised July 8, 1996 by Buell's Landscape
Contractors should conform to the revised site plan A-1. Specifically, the areas
between the building and the sidewalk, on the south and east side, should be enlarged
to conform to plan A-1. .
2. The plant material as proposed is acceptable; however, we suggest the following along
the front facade of the building:
(a) Relocate trees so as not to hide identification sign.
(b) Accent the entrance with foundation plantings.
3. The mulch utilized in all planting beds is specified as "rock mulch". The type and
color will require our approval prior to installation.
4. You have agreed to irrigate the entire site. Prior to construction, an irrigation plan
must be submitted for our approval.
5. Prior to construction, a grading plan should be submitted for our approval. We would
suggest incorporating some earth berms along Enterprise Drive with the excess dirt
you may have from excavation. '
6. The monument sign and all signage shall conform to our signage manual, a copy of
which is in your possession. The monument sign, as shown on A-5 in detail 1/5, is
acceptable; however, we will require your contractor to provide final construction
3500 �ti'est SOth Street Minneapolis, Nlinnesota SS�31 Gl2 C31-]000 Fax: 612 893-�513
� �
,__---�-�Ir. A.lan J. Meehan
' Page 2
. August 21, 1996
drawings prior to construction, indicating the dimensions, color and type of materials
utilized. In the event you have not selected a contractor, we would recommend you
contact Mr. Steve Hirtz of Nordquist Signs, who has handled most of the sign
. construction in our park. '
7. The monument sign set back is 40' from the property line; however, the City has
routinely granted a 20' setback approval in our park. The Planning Commission will
need to review the variance first, and thus have it approved by the City Council.
8. Location of all exterior light fixtures should utilize the high pressure sodium bulb.
Plans indicating location, type of fixtures and height of poles will need to be presented
for our approval. Any exterior wall-mounted light fixtures, if used, should be a non-
swivel fixture that casts its light downward, parallel to the vertical building facade. A
manufacturer's picture of the fixture(s) should be submitted for our approval.
9. The radius of the service drive at the northeast corner of the site has been brought to
your attention. You have indicated the radius will be increased to allow smoother
movement of vehicles. Final site plans showing this change will need to be submitted
for our approval.
B. BUILDING
1. Architectural plans, A-1, A-2, A-4, and A-5 (all dated June 10, 1996) were presented
for our review. Dale Glowa and myself made written comments on these plans,
forwarded them to you, and indicated they were acceptable, subject to final review
prior to construction.
Architectural sheet A-6 (dated June 12, 1996), which displayed the front entrance, was
also presented and was rejected. You then resubmitted a revised plan A-6 (dated July
1996), which we approved.
2. The exterior building materials to be utilized are:
(a) Color # 1, to be rock face block #313.
(b) Color #2, to be rock face block #296.
(c) The stucco used on the front entrance is to be the same color as #313 in 2.(a)
above.
(d) The color of the pre-finished metal flashing on the warehouse and the office
portion is to be close to the same color as #313 in 2.(a) above.
(e) The aluminum fixed windows are assumed to be tinted. Final color of the glass
surface, as well as the aluminum color, will require our approval prior to
construction.
(fl Colors used for all truck dock doors and service doors shown on the north
elevation (sheet A-4) must be submitted for our approval prior to construction.
(g) All rooftop equipment must be painted out with a color similar to #296 in 2.(b)
above.
: , � �
' ``�� Mr. Alan J. Meehan
Page 3
August 21, 1996
(h) Color af martar jaints has nat been specified and will require our approval prior
to use on your building. We will require your contractor to canstruct a panel
(on site) which will utilize the two rock face materials you have selected and will
also include the mortar jaint you would propase.
(i) Yau have stated all trash starage will be handled and stored inside the building,
and that is approved by us. �
(j) A11 roaf drains, if exterior, should be located at the sides or rear elevations of the
building and be painted or prefinished with a sirnilar color to match the building.
It is our understanding that plans not presented to date will be forthcoming far our review and
approval when you apply for a building permit with #he City of Mendota Heights. This is
acceptable to us.
We are pleased with the pragress you and your architect and/or contractor have rnade in the
design of the building and find it acceptable sub}ect to #he above Iisted items.
Please acknowledge your acceptance of the above terms and conditions by signing all three
enclosed originals in the space provided below; retain one original far yaur files and return two
ariginals ta my attentian We will then forward one ariginal ta the City of Mendata Heights,
which will serve as our �eliminary approval afyour project.
VerY truly yours,
I.
GIB/srh
IG T SYSTEMS, INC.
By:
�` Alan J. eehan, its President
�
ti
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
���
September 12, 1996 �'�
TO: Mayor, City Cauncil, and Gity Ad ��tor
FROM: Patrick C. Hollister, Administrative Intern��"�
SUBJECT: Outdoor Celebration/Live Music Request by Ziggy's
Discussion
Mr. Larry S. Mack of Ziggy's Deli and Ice Cream at Mendata Plaza is requesting
parmissian from the City of Mendota �Ieights to hold an outdoor one-year anniversary
celebration on Saturday, October 5, 1996. Mr. Mack would like the event to run from
8:30 am ta 11:00 p.m. on that day. During ihe course of the day, Mr. Mack would like to
offer specials and give-aways. Mr. Mack would also like ta have an outdoor barbecue
from 4 to 9 p.m. and a live band outside from 8 to 10 p.m. Mr. Mack has apparsntly
alread� hired an"oldies" band to play for the event if it is pernutted by the City.
Mr. Mack anticipates that weather pernutting he could serve as many as 1,000 customers
during the entire day of the event. Mr. Iviack wauld also Iike the Police Department to
�� assist in security frarn about 8 p.m. ta 11 p.m.
Mr. Mack visited with Staff abaut hits proposed event on Wednesday, September 11. Mr.
Mack said that he is willing to abide by any conditions that the City may place upon this
event. Staff reminded Mr. Mack that the City Council had granted Ziggy's temporary
pernussion far outdoor eating tables at their regular meeting on May 21, 1996, and that
one of the conditions of that pernut was that there be no outdoor live music. (This permit
witl end on Glctober I5, 1.996.) Mr. Macl� said that his recollectian of the discussian from
that meeting was that if he wished to feature outdoor live music he would need to return
ta the Council for special permission.
Mr. Mack toak the initiative ta compile his own list of issues on which he would need
permissian from the CiLy and Paster Enterprises: (Piease also see attached.)
l. Additional insurance coverage
2. Canopy/tent for food area
3. Roped, caned-off or barricaded area for portion of paxking lot
4. Band and hour"s allowed (estimated 8 p,m. ta 10:30 p.m.)
5. Barbecue arra gement and Iocation
6. Signage -- banner on store front and pylon sign (pylon sign on Dodd Road) -- 1 week
prior to event
7. Lighting
8. Possible small stage for band
9. Electrical accessibility
10. Trash removal
11. Special event permit
Please see the following attached materials:
1. A letter dated September 11, 1996, from Mr. Mack to the Mayor and City Council
requesting pernussion for the event
2. A letter dated September 10, 1996 from Mr. Mack to Paster Enterprises describing the
event and requesting permission for the event
3. A letter dated September 1 l, 1996 from Paster Enterprises to Mr. Mack granting
permission to hold this event
4. Mr. Mack's list of issues on which to seek approval from both the City and Paster
Enterprises
5. Mr. Mack's map of the event
6. A letter dated May 22, 1996, from Staffto Mr. Mack outlining the conditions of his
temporary permit for outdoor eating
7. That section of the Minutes from the May 21, 1996 City Council meeting which
pertain to the outdoor eating permit for Ziggy's
Please note that an additional condition of the outdoor eating permit granted to Ziggy's on
May 21, 1996 was that no food or beverage sales, storage or preparation may occur
outdoors. Thus, under the cunent conditions of the permit, the outdoor barbecue
component of this event would also be prohibited.
Council Action Required
If the Council wishes, it may pass a motion to authorize Ziggy's Deli and Ice Cream to
hold this outdoor celebration on Saturday, October 5, 1996, placing whatever conditions
upon the event the Council considers necessary.
� �
� � j
� �
Deii & Ice �ream
rvtendata Plaza • 750 Highway t 10 Phone: 612-445-9099
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Fax: 612-405-9097
September 11,149b
City of Mendota Heights
Office af the Mayor and City Council
1i8'i Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
RE.� ZIGGY'S DELI & ICE CREAMANNIVERSARYPARTY
Dear Mr. Mayor and City Cauncil Members:
Z�ggy's Del� & Ice Cream is approaching its one year anntversary
and we are requesting approvaf from the Ci#y of Mendota Heightsrto
hflve an anniversary celebrotion. .
In order to expedi�e plans for ih�s celebra#ion, we are seeking the
City of Mendota Heights' cooperatian and approval. Paster Enterprises,
our landlord, has been appNsed of fihe anniverscry party. They have
received the plans for review and have given us their approval as welt as
assistance with this venfure.
Piease review the attached le#ter that was submitted to Mr. Edward
Paster at Paster Enterprises. Also, find c forma! cpproval from Paster
Enterprises reiafilve to this event.
Thank you for your kind consideration of this matter. We laok
forward to working with you and we#come any comments andJor
questions.
Sincerely, /
� � �-
ar S. Mack
gwner
Ziggy's Deli & Ice Cream
�
� �
� y
Deli & Ice Cream
n�tendota Plaza • 750 Highway 110
Mendo[a Heights, MN 55120
September 10,1996
Pasfer Enterprises
Mr. Edward Paster '�
2227 University Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55114-1677
Dear Ed:
Phone: 6 1 21305-9099
Fax: 612-405-9097
C�� C��r-} �.-
�U"
�
As we dtscussed earlier this morning, Ziggy's Deli 8� Ice Cream is proposing to
have a"One Year Anniversary" party at the Mendota Plaza and am soliciting your
support for this �event. Cur�ently, I am discussing the specifics with the City of
Mendota Heights and my staff. The date of the event wiil be Saiu�day, Ocfobe�5th.
This event is scheduled to run from 8:30 am to 11:00 pm; open to close. We anticipate
running speciais, give-aways and other festivities. In addition, we would like to have
a live band and barbecue in the evening -- approximately, 8 to 10 pm and �4 to 9 pm
respectively.
Our goal, for conducting an event of this nature, is to extend our appreciation
for all of the support that has been extended to us throughout the year by the
residents and business community in Mendota Heights cnd the surrounding area.
Invitations will be sent out to the Mendota Heights Athletic Association member �
athletes. We will post an invitation to local residents as weli as Ziggy's patrons. Ziggy's
would like to extend an invitation to the Paster Enterprises staff to partake in this fun
occasion.
Ed, I do not have ali detai(s completety in place, however, I can assure you that
I will work closely with your office and the City of Mendota Heights to ensure that we
conduct a successful event in a manner that is favorabie to all involved.
The City of Mendota Heights is requesting a proJection in terms of number of
attendees. Off the cuff, coMingent upon weather and other factors, I would have to
estimate Ziggy's could serve up to 7,000 people from open to close. With favorabie
weather conditions, we could serve our usual 350-�50 customers daily traffic with an
additional 200 in the evening. Ziggy`s will have 12-15 employees to handle the fiow of
traffic in and around the store and mall untii the event (s over and all Is shut down.
Rest assure, our staff has handled as many as 200 customers at one Nme with half the
number of employees we plan to schedule that evening. The Police department wili
be contacted to either patrol and/or have onsighf securlty for a few hours in the
evening -- approxtmately 8 pm to close.
1
Page two......
(Vlr. Edward Paster
Ziggy's witl rent a barrel gr111, additional fables and chairs ta add to our patio
tirrangemen#. I wouid olso i�ke fa request €rom Pas#er �nterprises, pecmission to rope
or cone off an area so that we keep everything tn a designated area. Nat so much
for #he foot fcaffic but ta detour the parking lot fcaffic i� a� a#temp# to so#egucrrd #he
area.
Deb and I wan# to thank you again for your assistance with this event --
morecver, thraughout thts past year. Ycu and�your sfaff have canfiribu#ed grea#ly by
asslsting us in getting off ta a great start and we look forward to working with you on
ihis proJect and many more [n the months and years ta come.
Ed, I wauid appreciafe hearing from you at your eariiesi convenience refiative
to thts event so that I may then approach the Mendo#a Heights City Counci! to "ge# the
bcli" afficiaity roiiing. Thank you. �
����i�G� � .
D�vE�,qPMEN'3` ANi3 M,Aa�tAGEMFNI` t7P SHOI't''[ R3G CLNTF�S
22:7 Uilivarsity /kvG. • S!. Paul, TRPT Sjl ltl»1677 � G�2-6�15-7'JU1 • F�X 612-646-1389
G'1:NTRAL PLA7A
45th & (:ci2cr�l Avc. N.E.
Minnea�7c�]is, Minnesota
cRxs�r�, sxo�Fr�c c�v�t��
Rntis I,ake FLoad 8c W�.�;t Broadway
Crystal, Minncsota
September 11, 1996
�� o��� �".
��
�
Mr. Lsrry Mack
llOApWAY SHOPb'WC CENTET2 Les Mack Errterprises, aka ZIGGY'S CAF�
Smicn � Dadd R�ad 75{� Hwy i 3 Q
wesc sr. p�ul, Minnesata M+�ildot� Hel�hts, MN 55120
Dear Larry:
LEXiNGTONPLAZASHUPPES �� respanse ta your request to host a 1 year anniversary celebration at
Lexingtcrn & Lttrpcnteut ,
��s�Y2i�C. �1��$4� Zi99Y`s in Mendata Plaza, Paster Enterprises grants ail necessary
permission tc� hast yaur festivities, provided� they fall within city
specific�tions.
Ivl�l�Dt7i'A PLAZft
State i•I wy. I t4 & I7odd R�ad
Mendula Hcights. Minnes�7ia
MC3�UND5VIEW SQU111tE
fiWy. if? cYt LQng I,.t�kc 174ad
Mauncis Vicw, Minnesnta
NtyRTi�iWAY SfiC1FPING CEN'i�lt
Scaic Hwy. 23 & Woc,diand
�`ircic Pines, Miancsota
S�BLr:Y PLA2.A
west 7t2� Strcct i� �)avert�
St, Yaul, Minncsota
SOUTHViEW SHOYYYNG CEN'TFit
Southview Rlv�i. & 13th Ava. S
Sonti� St. ���i. ivlinnest�ta
Bes# o# Iuck qrt your event, and CC}N .fi.�RATi�L,4TIdN� on yaur 1 year
annivers�ry!
Bes# personal regards,
l
PASTER ENT�RPRISES
.JL�!'�a�.�
Jeffrey weet
Property Manager
JSStrlj
TflTpl P . A'�
� a
• � �
� - � � y
Deii & Ice Cream
Mendota Plaza • 750 H�ghway 110 Phone: 612-405-9099
Mendota He�ghts, MN 55120 Fax: 612-405-9097
NOTES• ZIGG �''S DE,LI &!CE CRE�I M
pNE YEAR ANNI VERSARY PARTY
Some issues to address and seek approval on from the City of Mendota
Heights and Paster Enterprises:
1. Additionai insurance coverage
2. Canopy/Tent for Food Area
3. Rope, Coned off or barricaded area for portion of parking lot
y. Band and hours allowed (estimated 8pm to 10:30 pm)
5. Barbecue arrangement and location
6. Signage -- banner on store front and pylon sign (pylon sign on ,
Dodd Road) -- 1 week prior to event
7. Lighting
8. Possible small stage for band
9. Electrical accessibility
10. Trash removai
11. Special event permit
. .%""7
, , � U ' '
. ��,,/" V �."•
V ' !
_ __ _ _ ' ' �I � ; : . j .
--•--__..�. - - -_—"--,�--�-"=: _ �=r::-.._,�,_ ;�._.,__._._,'" � — - - __---__--_.._--- !
--- - --. ,_.- ..� .,_ __ _._.._.� _.
• �' --•--�.--�_._--- -
; _.
� • . �
, , ,
�
' � .. - �
...--�---------••--�----------� I
� � . �
, �
�
�
,
. �
, .f� "`.��.
, ,�pi a ,,�-�.�. T � �"' :
. �, �Q _t2 :
��`' , .
�
�.G�P� b ��� pr�� ,
. �P;� , • � � ' ' . "
, �,,�`� . �, • � �x� flG�'— � `z► , t - ! „ � —
� �� � . ; .
� ��� � � � � � P�p��
s _. -- �,p atG,,c' � � a t � �,�'�
� �� � i
p� 2� p�-!z , a P , A�-� !: t�A� �o�
I � � ���� � I
%� �� :
l./ ..... o,iHr G',c,°"'�Di �
--�' $?�o�����' �� i
�� � ,�gAT�r�� ` .,
�
,r.,%' � �'.,Qtio pt�/ /� 1�� � . t
... � — �� �o{� � ,.-- •'�, __.. .. --� � � � ' -- L ; r
� . . G„_�.....�.
" Z� 6�fs-�' S A'""'�s ' 4 .
- - - _ " - — ._. r..rJ"// ' .. � A JI a.�C'n.r-.+�.
�
� 1��T O�
.... �. � 1��ier�dota Heights
` May 22, 1996
L.arrY Iir,�a.ck
Ziggy's Deli
750 Mendata Plaza
Mendota Heights, MN SS 120
Mr. Mack:
On May 21, 1996 the Mendota Heights City Council voted to grant a temporary
experimental license to Ziggy's at Mendata Piaz,a for the placement of 6 tables outdaors
for eating under the following conditians:
1. The license comrnences as of May 22, -1996 and ends Octaber 15, 1996.
2. The license may be revoked by the Council at any time ifthe Council receives a valid
written complaint abaut the tables. In such case the Councii will give a I O-day notice,
during which time you must remove the tables from the front of the store.
3. The autdoar area must provide sufficient access to all the' stores in the mall far
pedestrians, and shall be maintained at a11 times in a clean, attrac,five, and safe
condition.
4. No faad ar beverage sales, storage, or greparation may accur outdoors.
5. No outdoor live music or other outdoor live entertainment witl be per�mitted.
The granting of this license far the summer of 1996 in na way indicates that a sunilar
license wilt be granted for the summer of 1997 or beyond. The license has been granted
on a purely experimental trial basis for this suminer.
Thank You,
� ,�_��f,�
Patrick C. Holtister
Administrative Tntern
�.�
_ . .,_..
1101 Victoria Curve • 1�,,endata Heights, 1VfiN • 55118 452 • 1850
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
�
Page No. 13
May 21, 1996
Mr. Losleben stated that he is requesting approval to follow a
planting scheme similaz to what was done in the Friendly Hills
improvement project., and he explained the project for Council and
the audience.
Mayor Mertensotto asked what organization is in place to continue
maintenance on the property.
Mr. Losleben responded that on-going maintenance is always an
issue, but he only expenditure from the city is for the planting of the
trees.
Engineer Mogan sta.ted that seeding and mulching will be done
under the Friendly Hills construction contract and costs can be
financed through the project's contingency. -
Councilmember Smith moved to amend the Friendly Hills
construction contract to authorize the purchase of nine trees for the
sum of $1,800 and the planting of the trees in the area between Dodd
Road, Keokuk and Pagel Road.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Mr. Larry Mack stated that his is the first house on the cul-de-sac on
Pagel and he does not l�ow where the trees would be located but
feels the clean up of the site will be hindered because people drive
four-wheel velucles across the property. He explained that in the
past it was a bus waiti.ng azea and people now drive on the grass.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that Council did not want a diagonal
parking area to avoid that situation, and that is why there is only
parallel parlcing now.
Councilmember Smith cautioned staff to make sure the trees will not
obstruct the view of people approaching the intersection. She also
asked if Mn/DOT approval is required.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that Mn/DOT will have to give its
consent.
ZIGGY' S Council aclmowledged a memo from Administrative Intern Hollister
relative to a request from Mr. L,arry Mack for approval of set up an
outdoor eating area of three tables outside the mall in front of
Ziggy's and three tables inside the mall in front of Old America.
Council also aclmowledged a letter from Mr. Mack explaining his
. • ` � Page No. 14
May 21, 1996
request, a letter of agreement from Paster Enterprises, and a letter
from Planning Commissioner Friel.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he agrees with Commissioner Friel
that this would be a change and set a dangerous precedent. He did
not feel that Council should amend the conditional use permit for the
shopping center, as Council does not want outdoor sales.
Mr. Mack responded that he is asking for outside seating and for
outside sales - outdoor seating is essential to the growth of his
business. He explained that the common area is wide open and that
he has talked to he other merchants, only one of whom objects, and
that he has had many requests from his customers.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the conditional use permit does not
permit outside sales, nor does Council want to allow i� He -
suggested that Council could grant a temporary license on an
experimental basis provided Mr. Mack agrees that if there are any
problems brought to Council's attention from the general public
over maintenance, etc., the pernut would be withdrawn.
Mr. Mack stated that if it rains, some of the tables will be taken
down and moved under the awning. He stated that he is not asking
for approval of outdoor soda sales. •
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Mr. Mack must submit written
consent to the city that if there aze any written compla.ints to the city
of any nature, he will be given written notice and must cease the
outside operation within ten days. He suggested that the temporary
permit be issued on an experimental basis until October 15.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that she thinks it is good to find
an accommodation and that the city needs an outdoor eating area.
She felt that the area where the tables would be located looks like it
was designed for an eating area.
Mrs. Mack stated that it is traditional for coffee houses to have
outside seating and it is also a deterrent to skateboarders.
Councilmember Smith suggested that Mr. Mack work with Mr.
Paster on the location of the planters.
Mr. Mack sta.ted that he would like to have staff out in the area. and
take orders outside, and he asked if he could have soda sales from a
cart at night.
�
Page No. 15 '
May 21, 1996 . `
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that Mr. Mack should stick with
service and not sales outside.
Nir. Mack responded tha.t he would, and that orders would be taken
at the door and delivered to the tables. He informed Council that he
is considering having a musician on Saturday evenings, like many
coffee houses do.
It was the consensus not to allow live music.
Councilmember Krebsbach moved to approve a temporary special
license on an experimenta.l basis for outdoor seating in front of the
cafe, the license sunseting on October 15, 1996, with the
understanding that outdoor sales are prohibited and if the city
receives any written complaints the permit will cease upon ten da.ys'
notice to Ziggy's. �
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
CASE NO. 96-11, LTNITED Council acknowledged a memo from Administrative Intern Hollister
PROPERTIES regarding continued discussion on an application from United
Properties for a conditional use permit for planned unit development
and preliminary plat approval for two multi-tenant indusfrial
buildings at the corner of Enterprise Drive and Pilot Knob Road.
Mr. Da1e Glowa, from United Properties, reviewed new renderings
for the building. He explained that the proposed "spec" building is a
long building but the curvature of the site allows a bend in the
building, so while it is still long, &om any view along Enterprise
Drive it will not laok so big. He informed Council that Sun Country
Airlines will be one of the tenants.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that there must be some way, by
ordinance or other, that the city can exercise some control over
complete repainting of a building in the industrial park.
Mr. Glowa stated that United Properties has recorded protective
covenants with all the land and that sets guidelines where United
Properties has the sole right to review color, materials, exterior
signage, lighting, on-going maintenance, etc.
Mayor Mertensotto directed Assistant Hollister to put on-going
maintenance down as a planning item to consider. He pointed to a
`
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
September 12, 1996
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Kevin Batchelder, City Ad
Subject: MnDOT's Logo Sign Program
BACKGROUND
On June 24, 1996, a resident of Ridge South Condominiums contacted the City about a
"billhoard" sign that had been constructed on southbound I-35E at the approach to the T.H.110'
exits. MnDOT and their franchise operator, Minnesota Logos, Inc. were put on notice that the
installation of this sign was in violation of the City's ordinances and permit requirements. The
sign was erected without notice of any kind to the City, or without the benefit of a sign permit
or inspection. (Please see attached 7une 26, 19961etter to Minnesota. Logos.)
Minnesota Logos, Inc., responded to our letter by refusing to remove the sign or to
seek the proper siga permits and zoning approvals. They contend that the logo signs are not
advertising signs according to the Minnesota Statutes, rather they are directional signs for
"essential services" of gas, food, lodging and camping. They claim because they are in the
right-of-way that local permits are not necessary. (Please see attached 7uly 8, 19961etter from
Mr. Dave DeSutter, of Minnesota Logos.)
Council considered this issue at their 7uly 16, 1996 meeting and directed that the signs
be removed prior to August 2, 1996, as they are in violation of local ordinance requirements
and do not have the proper sign permits. (Please see attached July 22, 19961etter to
Minnesota Logos, Inc.) The signs were not removed and a letter was received from Ms. Jan
Ekem, of MnDOT responding to our order to remove the sign(s). (Please see attached August
2, 19961etter.)
Also attached is a 7uly 12, 1996 memorandum that describes the MnDOT logo sign
program.
DI5CU55ION
MnDOT is claiming jurisdictional authority over all trunk highways within the state of
Minnesota, regardless of 1oca1 jurisdiction and that the logo sign franchise progiam is in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes. At MnDOT's request, staff inet with Ms. F1{ern on
August 22, 1996 to discuss jurisdictional issues and review the standards of the logo sign
Program•
`NN�r
�� � �4�, Minnesota Department oi Transportation
�
� �Fy �` Transportatian Building
T°F�" 395 John Ireland Boulevard
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899
August 2, 1996
The Honorable Charles E. Mertensotta
City of Mendota Heights
i I O i Vicic�ria �urve
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 5513 8
Dear Mayor Mertensotto:
I received a copy of ihe letter you sent ta Dave DeSutter of Minnesota Lagas, Inc. regarding your
objection to logo signs that have been erected on state right-of-way within the city ofMendota
Heights. Although the letter was nat directed to me, I would Iike to acknawledge your protest
and clarify the Minnesota Department of Transportation's position. We believe the underlying
issue is with us, not Minnesota Logos, Inc.
Under the current scheme af jurisdictional autharity, the Department of Transportatian
(Mn/DOT), thraugh its Commissioner, has jurisdiction aver all trunk highways within the state of
Minnesata,, regardless af local jurisdiction. Likewise, M�n/DOT has statutory authority over the
logo sign franchise program in accordance with M'innesota Statutes Section 160.80. Therefore, it
is aur understanding and belief tlnat Minnesata Logos, Inc. has the right ta place loga signs on
highway rights-of-way according to the specificatians in their contra�t with us.
Mn1DOT daes not agree that the city is authorized to regulate the State's sign franchise grogram.
If yau believe atherwise, please e�plain on what basis yau make such claim. Also, we are
unaware af any instance wherein the State must seek germission from local government to
conduct its business on highway rights-of-way.
I realize that the logo sign franchise program may not be satisfactory to everyone, but the
Commissioner of Transportatian is caa-rying out the Department's obligation under l�tinnesota
Statutes Section 160.80 as best he can in the public interest. Perhaps we and our attarneys need
ta discuss and cla�ifY the jurisdictiona.l issues that have surfaced because af these signs. We
would be happy to meet with you if you so desire.
Sincerely, Y
; C.r?���`�c..�r.,-._.�
Janet G. Ekern
Partnerships Caordinator
...� ___ ........:...........�...
�
cc: James N. Denn„ Comrnissianer
Danyi E. Durgin, Deputy Corr►missioner
Dick Borson, Assistant Division Director, Operations
Dan Mueting, Attorney General
Dave DeSutter, Minnesota Logos, Inc.
Tom Hart, City Attorney
State Senator James Metzen
State Senator Aeanna Wiener
State Representative Tom Pugh
S#ate Representative Tim Cannars
�
� lty O�
.�,, , 1��ierlda�a Hei�hts
July 22, 1996
Mr. Dave PeSutter
Min�a�esata Logos, Inc.
201 Travelers Trail, Suite 230
Burnsville, MN 5533'7
Dear Mr. DeSatter:
This letter is to serve notice that all logo signs erected by Minnesota Logos, Inc. under
MnDQT's Logo Siga pragram within the City of MenQota Heights have been erected without
notice of any kind to the City of Mendata 8eights or without the benefit of the praper sign
pernuts and inspections. Therefore, these signs are to be removed, by order of the City
Council, pursuant to a unanimous motian at Weir me�ting on 7uly 16, 1996.
We are aware that logo signs have be�n installed at the T.H. 110 and I 35E interchange and at
� the Dodd l�:oad and I-494 interchange. If these signs, or any other Iogo signs within Menda#a
Heights, are not x�emoved by August 2, 1996, then the Council may request that the matter be
refemeci to the City Attorney,
We dis�� with yawr opinion that these signs ar� not advertising signs, as the Iogos of loeal
businesses are clearly displayed on the signs for advertising purposes. Your ium sells and
Ieases space on these sigas for advertisinS Pw�pases. The sigms sezve no pu�wse with respect
to trat`fic control or tiaff'ic safety and were ere�ted ia violation of the City's Zoning Ordinaace
and permit pmcesses.
In addition, MnDOT's Logo Sign Program is deficient in that there are not any stanciards, or
criteria, for judging compatibility with local land uses, for examining potential impacts on
neighboring properties or.for requiring permits from Ioca1 governments. The fact that this sign
exists in MnDOT right of way does not allow it to be used for commercial purpases or to
i,gnore Ioca1 permit/zoning processes. If this were hue, MnU�JT could lease right of way for
any number of commercial enterprises, from celltxlar ant�nna towers to coffee hut drive-ttuu's.
Capies of this letter, and previous correspondence, are being sent to each Si�te Represeniative
and State Senator from Mendota Heights' legislative districts so that they are aware af the
imgacts of the Minnesota Logo Sign program and the deficiencies of I�IuDOT's pmgram in
� addressing 1oca1 requirements/zoning aad loca�l notification.
1I01 Victaria Curve -1V�endata Heights, ,1Vf►N • vv118 452 • 185U
�.
M
Mr. Dave DeSutter
Ju1y 22, 1996
Page two
Yt is unfortunate that the City of Mendata Heights finds itself in a position contrary ta a state
sponsored "bilEbaani sign" parogram t�at was originally intended for the rural areas of this
country under a Federal Highway Administratioa (PHA) program. It is ironic that the federal
pragram was originally intended to prevent billb+aard pmliferatian, yet it has braught the fust
billbaaxds ever to Mendota Heights. 5inoe our incorporation as a municipality ia 1954, the
City of Mendota Heights has aiways pmhibited bill%cyards, under our statutory autbarity tca
enact and enforce zoning codes.
.,' Please respond to this c�iredive. If these signs, or any other logo signs within Mendota
Heights, are not removed by August 2, 1996, then your failure to act will precipitate further
adion on the part of the City.
Sincerely,
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor :
cc: Tom Hait, City Attorney
7anet II�ern, MnD4T P�rtnerships Coa��inator
State Senaxor James_Metzen
State Senator Dc:anua Wieuer
State Representative Tom Pagh
State Representative T5m Cammers
July 8, 1996
Mr. Kevin Batchelder
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve '
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Batchelder:
Q R� �fY.?.f..�'��� ;i f; i��•
�t'� s
,ae._...a..;. .,
� � � .JU�. � � �99� ;�. .
U�L,.. i�a4,%f,,.�! j �1'.-.�..
��•��e�o�ru....e�..��.,......... ..
I have received your letter of June 26, 1996.� I understand that
the City of Mendota Heights, not unlike many other cities,
prohibits billboards. However, Minnesota Logos is acting within
its rights to construct a Logo Sign at the location in question.
The Minnesota Logo Sign Program has been operating since 1993 on
rural highways, and was expanded to include the Minneapolis/St.
Paul urban area in 1993.� In August of 1995, Minnesota Logos took
over the administration of the program.
Before.Logo•-Signs;:'ar.e constructed in any area of the state,
Niinnesota Logos must first submit writter_ site plans to the
Minnesota • Department of Transportation, Office of Traffic
Er�gir�eering. All siies are reviewed by Mn/DOT�and th.en are either
approved or denied. The signs that were constructed for Exit 101AB
on I-35E meet all program requirements set forth by the Office of
Traffic Engineering.
Logo Signs are not classified as outdoor advertising according to
Minnesota Statutes. Rather, �hey are directional signs placed to
aid the motorist in finding the "essential services" of GAS, FOOD,
LODGING, and CAMPING. Because the sign in question iS on`state
right-of-way, the only necessary construction permit was applied
for and obtained through Mn/DOT.
Therefore, Minnesota 'Logos will leave the sign in qu.estion in
place, and will �continue to add businesses' to the panel if they
choose to participate. If you have�any other questians regarding
the Logo Sign Program, or the sign in questian, please feel free to
call me. -
Sincerely;
�Ju -e .
avid DeSut. er -
General Manager��,
cc : Ms Janet • Ekern, } MnDOT �
201 W. Travelers Trail, Suite 230 �
• Burnsville, MN 55337
612-895-8079 • 800-769-3197
- Fax 612-895-8499
C ity o�
.�., , 1Viendota Heights
June 26, 1996
Mr. I�ave DeSutter
Minnesota Logos, Inc.
201 W. Travelers Trail, Suite 230
Burnsville, MN 55337
Dear Mr. DeSutter:
It has come to the attention of the City of Mendota Heights that your fum, Minnesota Logos,
Inc., has erected a billboard siga along Interstate 35E in Mendota Heights, approximately 800'
north of the T.H. 110/I-35B intersection. This billboard sign includes advert[sements for two
local businesses, McDonald's Restaurant and FinaMart and was ere�ted without notice of any
kind to the City; or more importantly, processing aa application with the City for a sign permit
and an inspection for the installation.
lfiis letter is to officially notify you that the installation of this siga is in violarion of the City's
ordinances and permit requirements. P�rther use of the sign is to cease immediately, and it
shall be removed, for the reasons stated, ,; -�
The City of Mendota $eights takes seriously its permit and inspection obligations to pmtect
the health, safety and �welfare of the general public and has enacted regulations and inspection
procedures to upholri this responsibility, under statutory zoning authority granted by the State
of Minaesota. Prohibitions on billboard signs have historically been enforced in the City of
Mendota Heights since our incorporation as a City in 1956.
Thank you for your prompt attention in correcNng the noted violation.
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
City Administrator
cc: Mayor and City Council
Ms. Plaine Rose-Rudeman �
MnDOT Partnerships Coordinator Jan Ekem
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 5v118 452 • 1850
June 22, 1996
Jan Ekern, C�ordinatar, sign program
Minnesota Dept of Transpo�tation
395 John Ireland Blvd.
�S 700
St. Paul, Mn. 55155
Dear Ms Ekern,
This past week a huge road sign was placed, facing our -
bedroom windows, on Hway
35E (Southbound) in Mendota Hts„ indic�ting that the next
exit has gas and McDonald's. •
We resent havi�g to view the yellow and red gQlden arches
from our condominium windows. This advertising is not
appropria�e for this residential area.
Kindly remove �he sign from this location (North of Rt110 ),
to a less conspicuous spot,
where there are no residentia3 windows looking out on this
huge, blue, ugly sign, which
will be a� even worse eyesore once the leaves fall off our
trees.
Thank you for attention to�this matter. Please don't make
it necessary for us to call this
matter to the attention of our state J.egislators, the county
and town officials, the newspapers,
TV stations, etc. We are proud of the way our environment
has been kept along
Highway 35E, and hope you'll move the sign and it's
ou'trageous commercial intrusion
on our property. �
We look forward to hearing from you within the week.
Yours truly, �
Elaine and Sidney RuderFnan
612- 454-1817
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
July 12, 1996
To: Mayor and City Council ,
From: Kevin Batchelder, City Ad ' t
5ubject: MnDOT Logo Sign Program on Interstates
On June 24, 1996, I was notified by a resident of Ridge South Condominiums that a
"billboazd" had been constiucted on southbound I-35E at the approach to the T.H.110 exits. '
Inquiries were made to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDO'1� regarding this
sign. �� MnDOT was informed that billboards are not allowed in Mendota. Heights.
Ms. 7anet Ekem, Partnerships Coordinator with MnDOT, offered the following
explanation. In 1985, the Federal Highway Administration (FI-iA) created a rural sign
program to eliminate the pmliferation of billboards. The rural sign program was designed to
allow advertisers to place a logo on a blue highway sign in the right-of-way and that this
would be limited to services for travelers, such as food, gas, fuel, camping and ladging. The
federal government allowed each state to enact as they saw fit.
The State of Minnesota. allowed this program in the rural areas, but not the seven
counry metropolitan area. In 1993, the tourist industry pushed to expand the logo siga
program into the metropolitan area. The legislature, particularly the 5tate Senate, approved
legislation opening the metro area to the logo sign program, over the objections of MnDOT.
MnDOT has siace incorporated a logo sign pmgram for the metropolitan area by
establishing standards for distance from exits, location of directional signs, sight lines, and
bumping rights for adverkisers. For the fee of $50,000 per year, a private company,
Minnesota Logos, purchases a fianchise contract from MnDOT to access the right-of-way and
to operate the logo siga pmgram. Minnesota Logos owns, installs and mai.ntains the signs.
They pursue advertisers who rent space to place their logo on the sign.
To place a sign in the right-of-way, Minnesota Logos prepares an intersection plaa for
review by MnDOT. Once a location is approved, a permit is issued by MnDOT. MnDOT
only reviews the intersection plan for compliance with its distance and sight line standards.
There is no review for local impact or land use compatibility. It is MnDOT's and Minnesota
Logos contention, that because the sign is in the right-of-way, there is no need to process a
local sign permit or to seek any zoning approvals. '
DISCUSSION
Minnesota Logos were put on notice that the instailatian of this sign was in violation of
ihe City`s axdinances aad permit requirements. The sign was erected without notice of any
kind to the City, or without the benefit of a sign pernut or inspectian. (Flease see attached
7une 26, 19961etter to Minnesota Logos.) It has since come to my atteniian that another logo
siga has been erected at I-49� and Dodd Road. McDonald's Restaurant and Fina Mazt are
advertising on the logo sign.
Minnesota Logos has r�rsponded ta our letter by refusing to zemove the sign or to seek
the pmper sign permits and zoning approvals. They contend that the loga signs are not
advertising signs according to the 14�innesota Statuies {no citati.on provided}, rather they are
directianal signs for "essential services" of ga.s, faad, ladging and camping. They claim
because they are in the right-of-way that local permits are not necessary. (Please see attached
July $, 19961etter fram Mr. Dave DeSutter, of Minnesota. Logos.) MnDOT has nat
responded.
The issue of State agencies preempting local zoning cantrols have been discussed at
Mendota Heights on previous issues, including the AT&T cellular tower installa�ion and the
CUP for Sa1t Starage Shed at the MnDOT maintenance facility. At the time af the MnDOT
salt storage shed application, we were pmvided with a memorandum from the Department of
Admi.nistration and another from the Office of the Attorney General that discnss sta.te
gavernment exemption from local p3anninglzoning control. (Please see attached.)
In the case of the logo signs, they do nat serve a purpose that is related to t�affic
control or traffic safety, they are simply advertising. It is ironic that a federal. government
pragram ta eliminate billboard proliferatian has brought the first "billbaard" to Mendota
Heights, a community that has never allowecl this type of land use since we were incorporated
in 1956.
This item is on your agenda for discussian abaut haw to prac;eed with respect ta the
installation of logo signs within Mendata Heights. The City Attorney shauld be consulted
about the state government exemption from local planninglzoning control.
���.�� c .� � � •� �i �a
Discuss the Minnesota Logo Sign Prc►gram and provide directian to CiLy staff.
.----_ ._ .
�. � '�taine Rose-Ruderman
�sso ���w � (, St. Paul, MN 55 918 (b 9 2) 454-'I 8 9 7
� Mendota H ghLs, MN 55118 � . -.
�, __ _ _ ._ .
�
i
� ���� %� �-���c�./
� �
� .
c ��� ,�?.e�..��..e.�, ..�,�-�-.�. �-�-.�.-�-��.�..� %'��� .
o - � `���
�� �
c.� _ -�-�
— � ��..�, �-- a-.�
� ���--�-�- - ------___..
o �-� � � �:�,
,
�� . � �
� �� .
6-�, %�%y�,..���/ �,� ~�-�.�-cx
v ��
��� �
� �
...... ���� -
� .-
�-�--� .�- - . -
�� � �� �f�� �� .
I�' / r N J. r
C"''� ��'�^R--�..E�i�l� �`�-�'-^+9" �•(
�
C�%x-.�- �""T�:�� �-,�'..�e•�t.k: .. ,
r
.
STATE �)F MINNf.SOTA
Department of
r.
�inistration
o,� �u�o�:
To improve the quality
ana producuvity
of Minnesota
government.
�
Date
To:
October 19,1995
Building Officials
FROM: Thomas Joachim, State Building Official
VOICE: 296-4627
TTY/T'DD: 297-5353
FAX: 297-1973
SUBJECT: State Government Exemption from Local Planning/Zoning
� Regulation
Disputes have arisen state wide involving municipal building officials, who as
part of their duties, enforce zoning/planning ordinances for their municipality and
have been told by State agencies that these agencies are exempt &om these local
ordinances.
We have worked with the Office of the State Attorney General to clarify this issue
and help avoid future disputes. Please see the attached letter.. It is clear that state
owned property is not subject to local planning and zoning regulation.
State Agencies aze committed to maintaining a good working relationship with
local government entities. It is important that the agencies are made aware of the
concerns addressed and principles set out in local ordinances and whenever
possible, they will do what they can to work with the municipality, but it n�ust be
understood that they are not subject to these local ordinances.
Building code enforcement on "Public Buildings", which comes through contract
with this division, falls under MS 16B.61 and MS 16B.60 and is not part of the
planning/zoning issue.
We hope this information will help clarify these issues and prevent problems in
the future. If you need additional information please feel free to call us or have
your municipal attorney call the State Attorney Generals office and talk to Amy
Kvalseth @ 297-1135.
Building Codes and Standards Division, Facilities Management Bureau, 408 Metro Square Bui[ding,
Seventh and Robert Streets, St. Pau� MN SS101; Voice: 6I2 296-4639; Fax: 612 297-1973
TTY/TDD: T.win Cities 6l2 297-5353 or Greater Minnesota 800 627-3529 and ask for voice number
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Office of the Attorney Genera!
To : STEPHEN HERNICK
Building Codes and Standard Division
Department of Administration
FROM : AMY V. KVALSETH �
Assistant Attorney General
DATE
PHONE
October �, 1995
: 79%r113$ (VO1Ce)
282-2�2� (TDD)
SUB�ECT : State Government Exemption From Local Planning/Zoning Regulations
You asked the question of whether state governmental units are subject to local
governmental planning and zoning regulations. The answer is no, unless by statute the State is
expressly made subject to the planning or zoning regulation at issue, or the State consents to
regulation.
The answer comes initially from the principle that the State is the sovereign power. As
sovereign, the State regulates its own property. In the absence of a waiver by the State of its
right to regulate its own property, the property is exempt from a municipality's regulation.
Watson Construction Ca. v. Citv of St. Paul, 109 N.W.2d 332, 334 (Minn. 1961).
Or to express the concept differently, the State gives to its municipalities, including
counties, townships, and cities, only those powers enumerated in its laws. A municipality's
power to regulate land use by zoning or other means exists only by virtue of authority
delegated to it by the State. Costlev v. Caromin House. Inc., 313 N.W.2d 21 (Minn. 1981)
(municipality receives zoning power by legislative grant and cannot exceed limitations imposed
by enabling legislation); Dennev v. Citv of Duluth, 202 N.W.2d 892 (Minn. 1972). If the
State does not name itself as subject to a particular law, or if the law leaves any doubt as to its
application to the State, the State is not bound by the law. Minn. Stat. § 645.27.
The State has granted to municipalities authority to regulate land use within their
jurisdiction's through planning and zoning. Minn. Stat. chs. 394 and 462. The State has not
granted, however, to municipalities the right to impose zoning and conditional use permits on
the State.
Please contact me if you have further questions regarding this matter.
AVK/dsc.bcsd.ac8
. ._:.�,__.._ ...
� �:
f;
• • i
28
29
t60.601 MS 1957
160.61 MS 1953
160.611 MS 1957
160.62 MS 1953
160.621 MS 1957
160.63 MS 1953
160.631 MS 1957
160.64 MS 1953
160.641 MS 1957
160.65 MS 1953
160.651 MS 1957
160.66
160.661
160.67
160.671
160.68
160.681
160.69
160.691
160.692
160.70
160.701
160.702
MS 1953
MS 1957
MS 1953
MS 1957
MS 1953
MS 1957
MS 1953
MS 1957
MS 1957
MS 1953
MS 1957
MS 1957
ROADS, CENERAL PROVISIONS I60.80
[Repealed, 1959 c 500 art b s 13]
[Renumbered 169.901]
[Repealed, 1959 c 500 art 6 s 13]
[Repealed, 1957 c 943 s 72J
[Repealed, 1959 c 500 art 6 s 13)
[Repealed, 1957 c 943 s 72]
[Repealed, 1959 c 500 art 6 s 13]
[Repealed, 1957 c 943 s 72]
[Repealed, 1959 c 500 art 6 s 13j
[Repealed, 1957 c 943 s 72]
[Repealed, 1959 c 500 art 6 s 13]
[Repealed, 1957 c 943 s 72]
(Repealed, 1959 c 500 art 6 s 13]
[Repealed, 1957 c 943 s 72]
[Repealed, 1959 c 500 art 6 s 13]
[Repealed, 1957 c 943 s 72]
[Repealed, 1959 c 500 art 6 s 13]
[Repealed, 1957 c 943 s 72)
[Repealed, 1959 c 500 art 6 s 13]
[Repealed, 1959 c 500 art 6 s 13]
[Repeated, 1957 c 943 s 72)
[Repealed, 1959 c 500 art 6 s 13]
(Repealed, 1959 c 500 art 6 s 13]
160.80 SIGN FRANCHISE PROGRAM.
Subdivision 1. Commissioner may establish program. (a) The commissioner of
transportation may establish a sign franchise program for the purpose of providing on
the right-of-way of interstate and controlled-access trunk highways specific information
on gas, food, camping, and lodging, for the benefit of the motoring public.
(b) The sign franchise program must include urban interstate highways. The com-
missioner may implement policies that apply only to signs on interstate highways in
urban areas, such as distance requirements from the interstate for eligible services, pri-
ority issues, and mixing of service logos.
Subd. 2. Franchises. The commissioner may, by public negotiation or bid, grant
one or more franchises to qualified persons to erect and maintain, on the right-of-way
of interstate and controlled-access trunk highways, signs informing the motoring pub-
lic of gas, food, lodging, and camping facilities. A franchisee shall furnish, install, main-
tain, and replace signs for the benefit of advertisers who provide gas, food, lodging, and
camping facilities for the general public, and lease advertising space on the signs to
operators of these facilities.
� Subd. 3. Costs. All costs incuned under the program established by this section
must be paid under agreements negotiated between a franchisee and an advertiser or
advertisers, unless otherwise provided in the contract hetween the commissioner and
the franchisee.
Subd. 4. Contract requirements. All contracts made by the commissioner with a
franchisee must provide for:
(1) a requirement that the franchisee obtain liability insurance in an amount the
commissioner determines, jointly insuring the state and the franchisee against all liabil-
ity for claims for damages occurring wholly or in part because of the franchise; and
(2) reasonable standards for the size, design, erection, and maintenance of service
information signs and the advertising logos thereon.
......r,..� . ,�..._ . ,,._. . , . � .,._._._._ ..-- -
16Q.$4120ADS, GENERAL PRCIVISIOP25
30
The commissioner may require additional terms and conditions, including but not
limited to provisians on the renewai and termina#ian of the agreement, and in the event
of terminatian the rights of the state and franchisee relative to the franchisee's advertis-
ing cantracts. •
Subd. 5. Restrictions. The commissioner shall take na action under this section
which will result in the loss to the state of any federal highway construction funds.
Subd. 6. (Repealed, 1988 c 629 s 64J
Histary: 1984 c 417 s I2; 1986 c 444; 1993 c 128 s 1
RUADS IN SCENIC C1R RECREATIONAL AREAS
160.81 HIGHWAYS IN RECREATION AREAS.
Subdivisivn 1. Joint standards. The comrnissioner of transpartation, in consulta-
tion with the comrnissioner of natural resources, sha11 establish standards far trunk
highway segments located in areas of unusual scenic interest. The. standards shall:
{1} estabiish and ensure that the safety of the traveiing gublic is maintained ar
enhanced; .
{2} define "areas of unusaal scenic interest," which rnust inciude majar recre-
ational areas, histaric areas, and major pubiicly and privately owned iourist attractians;
(3) prescribe standards for righi-of-way, shoulders, and parking areas fpr trunk
highway segrnenis in such areas; and
(4) prescribe standards for scenic overlooks, parlcing piers and other parking areas,
tourist informatian facitities, pubIic water access points and _other facilities intended
to expand the recreational use of trunk highway se$rnents in such areas,
Subd. 2. Plan. The commissioner of.transportation, in consultation with the com-
missioner af natural resaurces, shall prepare a p2an far the recreational uses af trunk
highway right-of-way and adjacent public land in areas of nnusual scenic interest. The
plan must ensure that the safety af #he traveiing pubiic is maintained or enhanced. The
plan must provide �or the enfiancement of such recreational uses by the construction
of new recreational facilities or ihe improvement or rehabilitation of existing recre-
a#ional faciiities, as enumerated in subHivision l, clause {4}. The plan must pravide for
joint develppment of these facilities by the departments af transportation and natural
resaurces, where feasibfe, and must contain provisions permitting lacal units of govern-
ment and regionai development commissions to participate in the planning and devel-
opment of recreatianal facilities.
Subd. 3. Recreationai facilities, The commissioner of transportation may, in areas
of unusual scenic interest:
{ 1) construct, improve, and maintain recreational faciliiies, including parking
areas, scenic overlaoks, and tourist information facilities, on trunk highway right-of-
way and adjacent areas; and
{2} construct, improve, and maintain access ramps and tumoffs ta connect #runk
highways with recreational land owned by the department of natural resources.
Subd. 4. [Repealed, I987 c 321 s 8j
History: 1986 c 454 s 4; 1987 c 321 s 1; 1994 c 635 art 1 s 2
160.82 PARK ROADS.
Subdivision 1, Definition. "Fark road" rneans that portion of a street or highway
tocated entirety within the gark boundaries af a city, county, regianal, or state park. *
Subd. 2. Restrictions. A road authority may not nnake a change in the width, grade,
ar alignment of a park road that wauld affect the wilfllife habitat ar aesthetic character- ,
istics of tha park road or its adjacent vegetation or tenain, unless: .
(1) the change is requxred to permit the safe travel of vehicles at ihe speed lawfully •
designated for the park road, in which case the change mnst be tnade, ar .
. �
y
�
4
4
:�
�rr
�
�
�
��
L
September 12, 1996
Mayar, City Council, and City Ad ' st r
m
i 1 i Ot :
MEMO
�
FROM: Patrick C. Hollister, Administrative Intern
SUBJECT: Cansideration of Ordinance Change for Variances '�
� . .
Discussion � ' '
* r
At the August 27, 1996 meeting of the Planning Commission, the commission voted 6-0
E
(with T'ilsen absent) to formally request that the City Council cansider amending the '
Zoning Ordinance. The amendment would allow the Council at its discretion to grant a
variance to a single-fanuly home owner if all signatures of consent have been obtained and
the variance was not considered detrimental to the neighbarhood or the intent of the
Zoning Ordinance even �no hardship or practicat dzffzculty had been demonstruted. The
Council would still be at liberty to consider each application on a case by case basis and
deny a variance if it so wished.
Cornmi �sioner Friel said that he has often felt com elled to vate to recomm.end deniat af a
P
variance application by a homeowner, even thaugh he had no substantive objectian to the
praposal and perhaps even felt it would be a welcome improvement to the property,
rnerely because he saw neither a hardship nor a practical difficulty required by the Zoning
Qrdinazice. The Planning Carnmission thus asked that the Cauncil consider amending the
Zoning Ordinance.
Please see the attached sectian of the I��'innesota State Statutes (1994 Edition) which
addresses criteria for variances. Mr. Friel has reviewed the relevant state statutes and feels
that despite the "tough language" they contain an variances, they do not prahibit an
amendment to aur Zoning Ordinance such as the one he proposes. �
Recammendation
The Planning Comrrussian reco�unended on August 27, 1996 that the Council amend the
Zoning '`4rdinance to allaw the Council to grant variances at its discretian for single-farnily
hameowners even if no hardship ar praciical difficulty is demanstrated, provided: �
1. thatl the hameowner has obtained all necessary signatures af consent
2. that no one has expressed objection to the applicatian
3. that the application will not alter the essential character of the neighbarhood
i
�
4 >
\
\
t �l
RECOMMENDATION ~ ' -
. �
The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend that the following
language be added to the Ordinance:
Where there is written consent, not to be defined as a lack of objection, by
� all affected property owners, in those cases which would otherwise lack
hardship or practical difficulty, the City Council may, but is not required to,
grant the requested variance by a majority vote of the Council.
ACTION REQUIRED
Review the Planning Commission's request. The City Council should
consider directing the City Attorney to review this proposed Ordinance ���
Amendment on Variances. If the Council desires to proceed with an Ordinance
Amendment to Section 5.5, Variances, they should direct staff to publish for a �
public hearing, to be conducted by the Planning Commission at their Oc*ober
meeting. • "
� _. .
KLB:kkb . '
. - . 1
.� - - � �
, n
�2 • ._ .
` 462J57 I�OUS[fYG� REDEVELOPMENT, PLANN[NG, ZONING 87p
in the notice shall not invalidate the proceedings, provided a bona fide attempt to com_ �
pl}% with this subdivision has been made.
Subd. 4. Amendments. An amendment to a zoning ordinance may be initiated by
� the governing body, the planning agency, or by petition of affected property owners as �
� defiaed in the zoning ordinance. An amendment not initiated by the planning agency
shall be referred to the planning agency, if there is one, for study and report and may
not be acted upon by the governing body until it has received the recommendation of
the planning agency on the proposed amendment or unti160 days have elapsed from
I the date of reference of the amendment without a report by the planning agency,
Subd. 5. Amendmen� certain cities of the first class. The provisions of this subdivi_
� sion apply to cities of the first class. In such cities amendments to a zoning ordinance .
shall be made in confomiance with this section but only after there shall have been filed
in the office of the city clerk a written consent of the owners of two-thirds of the several
descriptions of real estate situate within 100 feet of the total contiguous descriptions
' of real estate held by the same owner or any party purchasing any such contiguous prop.
erty within one year preceding the request, and after the a�rmative vote in favor
� thereof by a majority of the members of the governing body of any such city. The gov-
� erning body of such city may, by a two-thirds vote of its members, after hearing, adopt
I a new zoning ordinance without such written consent whenever the planning commis-
� sion or planning board of such city shall have made a survey of the whole area of the
I• city or of an area of not less than 40 acres, within which the new ordinance or the
amendments or alterations of the existing ordinance would take effect when adopted,
� �• and shall have considered whether the number of descriptions of real estate affected by
i such.changes and alterations renders the obtaining of such written consent impracti�al,
�i and such planning commission or planning board shall report in writing as to whether
in its opinion the proposals of the governing body in any case are reasonably related
to the over�ll needs of the community, to existing land use, or to a plan for future land
use, and shall have conducted a public hearing on such proposed ordinance, changes
or alterations, of which hearing published notic.� shall have been given in a daily news- '
paper of general circulation at least once each week for three successive weeks prior to
i such hearing, which notice shall state the time, place and purpose of such hearing, and
shall have reported to the governing body of the city its findings and recommendations
in writing.
Subd. 6. Appeals and adjustments. Appeals to the board of appeals and adjust-
ments may be taken by any affected person upon compliance with any reasonable con-
ditions imposed by the zoning ordinance. The board of appeals and adjustments has '
� the following powers with respect to the zoning ordinance:
(1) To hear and decide appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in any
order, requirement, decision, or determination made by an administrative o8'icer in the
� enforcement of the zoning ordinance.
� (2) To hear requests for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in
instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of cir-
icumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and to grant such ,
variances only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the
'� spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the
i granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable �
use if used under conditions allowed by the o�'icial controls, the plight of the landowner ,
is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the
variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic con-
siderations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the prop- `
j erty exists under the terms of the ordinance. Undue hardship also includes, but is not �
� limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall �
be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in section 216C.06, subdivision
2, when in harmony with the ordinance. The board of appeals and adjustments or the
governing body as the case may be, may not permit as a variance any use that is aot
j permitted under the ordinance for property in the zone where the affected percon's land
...\, -�
\ � .
87l IiOUSING, REDEVELOPMEIVT. PLANNWG, ZONING 462358
is located. The board or governing body as the case may be, may permit as a variance
the temporary use of a one family dwelling as a two family dwelling. The board or gov-
erning body as the case may be may impose conditions in the granting of variances to
insure compliance and to protect adjacent properties.
Subd. 6a. Normal residential surronndings for handicapped. It is the policy of this
state that handicapped persons and children should not be excluded by municipal zon-
ing ordinances or other land use regulations from the benefits of normal residential sur-
roundings. For purposes of subdivisions 6a through 9, "person" has the meaning given
in section 245A.02, subdivision 11.
Subd. 7. Permitted single family ase. A state licensed residential facility serving six
or fewer persons, a licensed day care facility serving 12 ar fewer persons, and a group
family day care facility licensed under Minnesota Rules, parts 9502.0315 to 9502.0445
to serve 14 or fewer children shall be considered a permitted single family residential
use of property for the purposes of zoning.
Subd. 8. Permitted multifamily nse. Except as othezwise provided in subdivision
7 or in any town, municipal or county zoning regulation as authorized by this subdivi-
sion, a state licensed residential facility serving from 7 through 16 persons or a licensed
day care facility serving from 13 through 16 persons shall be considered a permitted
multifamily residential use of property for purposes of zoning. A township, municipal
or county zoning authority may require a conditional use or special use permit in order
to assure proper maintenance and operation of a facility, provided that no conditions
shall be imposed on the facility which are more restrictive than those imposed on other
conditional uses or special uses of residential property in the same zones, unless the
additional conditions are necessary to protect the health and safety of the residents of
the residential facility. Nothing herein shall be construed to exclude or prohibit residen-
tial or day care facilities from single family zones if otherwise permitted by a local zon-
ing regulation.
History:1965 c 670 s 7; 1969 c 259 s 1; 1973 c 123 art S s 7; 1973 c 379 s 4; 1973
c S39 s 1; 1973 c 559 s 1,2; 1975 c 60 s 2; 1978 c 786 s i4,15; Ex1979 c 2 s 42,43; 1981
c 3S6 s 248; 1982 c 490 s 2; 1982 c 507 s 22; 1984 c 617 s 6-8; 1985 c 62 s 3; 1985 c 194
s 23; 1986 c 444; 1987 c 333 s 22; 1989 c 82 s 2; 1990 c 391 art 8 s 47,• 1990 c 568 art
2s66,67,•1994c473s3
462358 PROCEDURE FOR PLAN EFFECTUATION; SUBDIVISION REGULA-
,�:; �� TTONS. - -,.tf;•.
a�:=r'' . .
Subdivision 1. [Repealed, 1980 c 566 s 35] '
Subd. 1 a. Aathority. To protect and promote the public health, safety, and general
welfare, to provide for the orderly, economic, and safe development of land, to preserve
agricultural lands, to promote the availability of housing affordable to persons and fam-
ilies of all income levels, and to facilitate adequate provision for transportation, water,
sewage, storm drainage, schools, parks, playgrounds, and other public services and
facilities, a municipality may by ordinance adopt subdivision regulations establishing
standards, requirements, and procedures for the review and approval or disapproval
of subdivisions. The regulations may contain varied provisions respecting, and be
made applicable only to, certain classes or kinds of subdivisions. The r�gulations shall
be uniform for each class or kind of subdivision.
A municipality may by resolution extend the application of its subdivision regula-
tions to unincorporated territory located within two miles of its limits in any direction
but not in a town which has adopted subdivision regulations; provided that where two
or more noncontiguous municipalities have boundaries less than four miles apart, each
is authorized to oontrol the subdivision of land equal distance from its boundaries
• within this area.
Subd. 2. [Repealed, 1980 c 566 s 35]
Subd. 2a. Terms of regulaflons. The standards and requirements in the regulations
may address without limitation: the size, location, grading, and improvement of lots,
�
`
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
� Y11 � ul ►11 � I1: :I :
u I �I►_� �
��
Mayor, City Council and City A 's tor
James E. Danielson
Cruz Variance, Case 95-14
DATE: � September 13, 1996
DT�('_iTSSTnN�
I
Attached is a December 26, 1995 memo with its attachments addressing Mr. & Mrs.
Richazd Cruz; 1338 Cherry Hill Road variance request. At that Council Meeting it was
decided to involve a professional mediator to attempt to arrive at a solution to the problem.
Formal mediation was then conducted over the following months, with no progress arrived at.
Upon failure of that mediation Paul Berg sent Mr. & Mrs. Cruz a letter requiring them to
bring their driveway into compliance with the City's setbacks (see attached letter). Mr. &
Mrs. Cruz have now completed their driveway modifications and their driveway is in
compliance with City setback requirements.
I
I was recently contacted by Mr. Neska, Cruz's neighbor. He reported that Mr. & Mrs.
Cruz are still parl�ng /storing their RV in their driveway. He desires the City to now amend
the Zoning Ordinance so that it will not allow for storage of RV's.
,
�
i
If you will recall the City's prosecuting attorney refused to pursue prosecution of this
matter because of the ambiguity in the City's Zoning Ordi.nance over the fact that parking and
storage are not defined in the ordinance. The Ciuz's maintain that they are only "parking"
their RV in their driveway.
Because Mr. Cruz has now brought his driveway into compliance with setbacks the
next issue to consider is whether or not the City desires to grant Mr. Neska's request and
amend the ordinance to adequately define pazking versus storage of recreational vehicles.
I
AC'7TnN R�F ,�TTiRF,n:
�
Deterniine if the City should begin the process to amend its zoning ordinance relative to
Outside Storage in Residential Districts (Ord. 401 5ection 21.4). Should Couacil desire to
make such an amendment they should direct staff to draft the proposed language, review the
language with the City Attorney for appmpriateness and call for a public hearing at a Planning
Commission meeting for the purpose of considering the language before final consideration
and adoption by the City Council.
COUNCIL �Y - FOR CLOSED SESSION
CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS
I►_il�l►� �]
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: 7ames E. Danielson, Public Works Direc
RE: Cruz Variances
Case 95-14
.� • :
December 26,1995
At the September 5,1995 meeti.ng, Council denied variance requests from Mr. & Mrs.
Richard Cruz, 1338 Cherry Hill Road for storing their recreational vehicle within the required
10' side yard setback and for a 5' side yard driveway setback (see attached Resolution 95-53).
On Septemtier 8, 1995 the City sent the Cruz's a letter formally informing them of Council's
action and instructing them� to take the required corrective measures immediately (attached).
The Cruz's and their attorney responded to this letter with their own letters dated September
13 and 14 (attached) informing the City they did not agree with City's interpretations of the
Zoning Ordinance.
To date the Ciuz's have not taken any action to bring their properiy within the City's
ordinance and their neighbors the Neskas and the Steenbergs have been calling City Hall to
find out why not and what the City's actions will be should the Cruz's continue to store their
RV in their front or side yard.
� •.
After the Cruz's inaction, staff discussed the matter with Mr. Martin Costello, the
City's prosecuting attomey. After reviewing the case, Mr. Costello reported back to us that he
did not feel the City would prevail in court and he recommends that we not proceed with a
prosecution.
Because Council was involved in this matter by denying the variances and because the
two directly affected neighbors continue to ask questions, we are bringing this matter back for
Council to review the options and determine the course of action.
`
Q�� �
1. i Da nothing. Allow Mr. Cruz to continue to store his RV on his property.
2. � Prosecute the Cruz's for a misdemeanor. Against his advice, dimct the City's
i Pros�cuting Attorney ivl�utin Costello to proceed wiih the prosecution,
3. � Amend the Ci 's Zonin Oni�nance. Make the Ordinance more enforceable an
. tY �
I RV storage and then enfarce it.
i
4. �, Involve a mediator. Infarmal mediation has already been attempted between the
i Cruz's and their neighhors and has nat been successful.
I '
5. ; Other. Prosecute the Cruz's in a civil abatement action.
i
C`.Ti N $F.(iT� Ri�� .
Review the optians and determine a course af action.
�
�
� ---/� �`' -�-� i,:^` ,... 1
r' ��. .. �� '�:i.' . `� t
.� / a. }' � J!�'` JI 1 W �
!,. _ �� _. ;,r ,..,� � , ..,� r_
,
.''�; j' .� i` ./i'f "~ 'r ^"`. ..
i _,, 1 ^�,,.,:.%r r' ' .�.. 1
�- jf 'rj^� . ~'`r --''r 4� �., t „/
, ' ! r'' ,. ; �� . , , .. '� �
'� J f' `�.. ' ---�.
: f{ .
, ` r �' -,, / , � ,
f�� jJ � i .i r
0�� � i ( 1 j � � °�• _ c`j `�1 ..� •��, rr
} � � 1 �,,.. ..� r
, ��,� ; ,�__..�. _. � , .,; �.
1t }' 1 t ; f f_. ..,..-� `!.r : �- ; � �:: .�;
f t jt � :• � _..»— � .
,;�J� (/( �"M f ..,•--'... , ..�,,'" "� i ' ...
i� f ^� •" J.� Q' r r,,,J
��tj�"'.j� . / 1 -. :.T'� �� !,i j ,,, y
-v- t; �� j � j-_.__„/' ' � --.. / �' fi
� a,,� �,� `_..'••L {' . .� , � �
/ .+ .� •�/ ! 'J - � � � .�..,,,y ��. ��.�ti � � �
r•^ ! � t
„/'� f I �r��„���' � ��'�
j' . . � ,r �.. .
,• �; �� � _�,i% f . j ' ''C�"^- .:=�
,� /�''�-� . /�� 1� --�� ' f � r
. , '^ �„_ �� ,� ;,, , � �l �� ^�=::. .,. � �
.._ 1 '" r„ � � �.' 4 � A.
�.-" �^�'^ � � '�?� "�
�__. � ..�� ., ` A�'� � ;
,`� ` ��. r�;�-1, �; �f;'t',�..
r�� y ,,,,;�, h*�, t.3� _� _../ ��lJ � e �,,. 1',i �� i�-�..,
r ' c�� � a\ �� ` �'�,� .
,-
; ; �--._`-, _ c �� �� `��; � t
��•—_.._.,` � , ( �,�� j ,�{
t k' � � � � � - =:.:�-...:::.� 1. �! � � �
it � � t `� �-•-^� ~ - .� -,.... � :.l' _..
t/ r �� , �j :� ,r
f �
�F { �,~ �
.�I��D � ._
?Vo, � _ TA .�EI
� 14 ���'S
`�' .� �. � - �.,.,_'�,��'
�` I � �
��
� �
�,���� '� ��1
.. �-� j�. ,,,�,� �''�r �
M � .I� �t�M , �
� � �
� � �
'y•, � �
� �
�;~ � ...�, ; � �,,,� � •+�
y � � �
�
i � f =� � �� �
. �
�� �,Y
, ^'�`P"`'—`'' : , ��t� ;�, �"` � 1
�� � � � � , t' �
^ � � � , " , (i�
� ti� ,
Zi. � ,i.r .o,._ � � � , y'!�
�1��� ?�R+`�' *� �� . ��
���,�► ,� �.� '` , �
'"`�►� (�'` f �• l�{��^" ' �►,
� „ � ! � �I'
� w ��' -•� �►
���' ''. � ti- �
�� t�� M � , �
r�.C.._ � l�'�•� �..� '� `t11�� •. �� ,
r"'.r., �tV ',7r �.
.�- _ ` =a � � ���
� �s
pi � :•.'�,.�„�,...,,: ��
� M ���ill��i1Z�
''� ,�i�-"� �l �-
� � �,
r
� r�`. � � � :�'�
� ��
�__ ,��
��; � w �,,,�� �ii�ii
�.kr � �,�i �f//� �s�. !="J
�
v-
�S � �` `.
....,.,-.
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MIlVNI�'SOTA
RE50LUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION DENYING VARIANCES FOR DRIVEWAY SETBACS A1VD
STORING A RF.(`RF.ATIONAL VEHICLE AT 1338 CHERRY HILL ROAD
�
I
WHER�AS, Mr. Richard Cmz, of 1338 Cherry Hill Road, has applied for a Variance
to the required Driveway Setback and a Variance to allow Storage of a Recrea�ional Vehicle in
the required Side Yard on a driveway that has been installed at 1338 Cherry Hill Road, as
proposed on plans in Planning Case File 95-14; and
i •
�+ , the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their August 22,
1995 meeting; and , '
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended o� a 5-0 vot� that City Council
deny said requested Variances based on a lack of a legal basis for a hardship; and
;
� , the City Couacil reviewed said application for Variances at their meeting
on September 5, 1995.
NOW, THEREFFORE, IT IS �REBY ItFSOLVID by the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights that a finding of undue hardship or difficulty unique to the properly and;
not created by the owner does not exist; and
I . .
BE IT FIJRTHIIt RESOLVID by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights
that the requested Variances, if granted, will alter the character of the neighborhood aad
establish aa undesired precedent; aad
i
BE IT F[JRTHER RESOLVID by the City Couacil of the City of Mendota Heights,
that the conditions required for approval of the requested variances do not exist and that said
requested Var�ances are hereby denied.
� �
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 19th day of September,
1995. i
ATI'I�ST:
CITY COUNCIL
CTTY OF Mffi�TDOTA HEIGATS
� BY
Kathleen M. Swanson, City C1erk Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
r.l�y O�
.,.. � j 1��ierido�a .Hei�ht�
s��m�� s, ls�s
�.
�. �n� c�
1338 Cherry Hill Road
Mendot� Aeights,l4�I 551.1$
Dear Mr. Cruz:
I am writing to fonually notify you that the City Cauncil, at their meeting of September 5;
1995, deni,ed your reqaest for setback variaaces far cir�.veway loca�ion aad starage of a
z�ecreationat vehicle, as prapcfsed in Planning C'ase No. 95-14.
Tt�e City Council dii�ed staff to prepare a Resolution of Deni.al for their consideration at the
Sept�amber 19, 1995 City Couacil mee�ing. The Ciip Council established findings of fa�t that
there exis�ed na �aardships unique to the property that were nat created by the owner, tha� there
was. a lack of a 1ega1 basis for a ha�ship, and that these variances, if granted, would alfer the
character of the neighborhood and esta�rlish aa uades� pi�edent.
The denial of yaur request means that the RV should be moved immediately. I have enclosed
a copy vf the Or+dinance I�To. 4Q1, Secrion 21,4 which spells oui the requirnements for
park�ing/storing a recreational vehicle in a residenual disaic�. RV's �re allowed to be in the
rear and side ya�d if i�n compliance with req�ured sc,�#backs.
If you have any questions, or cancems, please contact me at 452-1850.
Sincerely,
�;t,�- . j�j���-G�---
xevin Batchalder
Administrative Assistant
cc: Pau1 Berg, Ca1e Pnforcement 4fficer
Dick Gill, Code F�forcement C}�oer
6
1101 Victaria Curve -1VS,endota. Heigf�ts, N�N. � .5v118 � ��.��;�452•1850 � �:.
�4w ♦
i•ft/ M
r
21.3(2)i Where the drive-in or fast food restaurant abuts an "R"
District, a landscaping sareen or fence not over six {6j
feet nar 2ess than five (5j feet shall be constructed
� alang the property line abu�ting the "R"' District. A
; fence shal2 nat be required within the front yard.
21.3{2}f All structures shaI.l be fznished an all exterior wa13s
C with the same material.
21.4
..
Banners, pennants and other
shall not be permitted.
similar promotianal devices
Parkinq Requiremen� - One (1) space for eaah employee
per shift in addition to at least one (Z} parking space `
for each fifteen (15) square feet of gross floor area in
the building as per Section 21.1(4j1 of this Ordinance.
OIITSIDB STORAGE IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
21.4(1) ; The outside storage of recreational equipment is
� permitted in one side anly or rear yard in all
residential zoning districts, provided tha� any such
i side yard staraqe shall not be adjacent to a street and •
i fur�her provided that.all setback requiremen�s �hall be
� met. dutside storage of vehicles and rec�eational
,� equipment not origirtally constructed for recreational
; use shall not be permitted.
'� 21.4 (2� i
.
�
. 21.4{2ja�
. �
, 21.4(2jb�
� 21.4(2)c�
For the purposes of this ordinance,
eguipment shall include the fallowing:
Boats and canoes.
All--terrain vehicles.
recreational
Trailers for the transportation of boats, canoes and
a21-terrain vehicles.
21.4(Z1d! All motor vehicles desic}ned, constructed, or used to
� provide temporary, movable living quarters for
i recreational use. �
21.4(2)e� Travel trailers,
21.4(2)f� Snowmobiles. �
21.5 i SIGNS
�
j Signs are a per�nitted accessory use in all use districts
i subject �o the following regulations:
�
21. 5(lj i A sign is a structure or a part of a structure for �he
; purpose of applying yard and height regula�ions.
(�oi� zo6
RICHARD J. GABRIEL
ATTORNEY AT LAW
SU[TE 200
175 WEST LAFAYETTE FRONTAGE ROAD
SAMT PAU4 M[NNESOTA SS I07-1424
September 14, 1995
�
Mr. Kevin L. Batchelder
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
RE: Richard Cruz
Our File No.: 92-218
Dear Mr. Batchelder:
r'ec '� �( - � S � S
TELEPHONE (612) 222-2731 LEGAL ASSISTANTS
FACSIMILE (612) 223-51 14
GERALDINE A. BERGQUIST
LYNNE M. MASANZ
rI am in receipt of your letter of September 8, 1995, addressed to
my client, Richard Cruz. I note in reviewing Ordinance No. 401,
Section 21.4, that the ordinance prohibits storage unless the
storage is in the side or rear yard. There are two issues raised
by this ordinance in relation to the facts of Mr. Cruz�s case,`.`
First of all, Mr. Cruz maintains that he is not storing his motor
home, but rather is parking it. The ordinance does not prohibit
parkin.g but prohibits storage. Storage is of a more permanent
nature than parking. I am unaware of whether your ordinance
defines or differentiates between these two terms. I have recently
written a letter to Thomas Hart, the City Attorney for Mendota
Heights, asking his clarification on this issue.
Secondly, there is no definition in the ordinance of what
constitutes a"side yard" and what constitutes a"front yard". You
have informed me that a side yard is that portion of the yard
directly adjacent to the side of the house and does� not extend
beyond the�front line of the nouse as extended. However, your
ordinance does not state that and this appears to be a real
ambiguity. Another reasonable definition of side yard would be
that portion of the lot that is to the side of the house as
extended forward and backward. If there is a clear definition of
"side yard", please inform me.
Mr. Cruz has attempted and will continue to attempt to comply with
the ordinance. The ordinance does not prohibit the outside storage
of recreational equipment, nor does it prohibit the parking of
recreational equipment outside.
I would like to see this matter resolved amicably. For that
reason, we brought the variance request before the City Council.
The City Council felt that they could not grant a variance.
However, this does not mean that Mr. Cruz is in violation of the
'. ' � i
0
Mr. Kevin�L. Batchelder
Page 2
September 14, 1995
City ordinance. This was merely one attempt to find a solution to
a problem�
�
We have attempted to work with the neighbors in resolving this
problem; however, they have been unwilling to do so. Since they
have complained to you, I suggest that you contact them and point
out the fact that there are real problems with attempting to
restrict Mr. Cruz�s parking and/or storage of his motor vehicle on
his lot. �
Mr. Cruz i�s willing to plant tall evergreens or construct a fence.
If there are other ideas, he is willing to listen.
�.Very truly yo s,
, i�%��
i'� � � ,
Richard J abriel ,:
k2JG : lmm�mis�.i.� �
cc: Richard Cruz
Thomas Hart, Esq.
�
,
���' �^ ��^ 9S^
Richard F. Cruz
1338 Cherry Hill Raad
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
September 13, 1995
w ,
Mr. Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendata, Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Batchelder:
In compliance with the City of Mendota Heights ordinance for arkin ���
recreational vehicle {RV's}; I have a� rked my RV on one side of my
residential yard and five (5) feet from the property line. This is in accordance
with side yard and setback requirements for arkin recrea#ional vehicie.
Sincerely, �
,��.-
Richard F. Cruz
cc: Richard �abriel, Attorney at Law
I
Mr. & Mrs. Richard F. Cruz
1338 Cherry H'iIt Road .
Mendota Heigh#s, MN 55118
�
�
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Cn2z;
� City o�
�'Uiendota I�ei�l�tS
I arn directed to once again fonn�.ly notify you that the City afMendata Heights 2oning
Ordinance 401 Section 4.18{5) states " aIl driveways, required off street pazking spaces, and other
areas intended to be uti�ized primarity for parking ptuposes shall be surfaced with concrete ar
bituminous surfaces. Driveways shall be minirnum of fiva feet fram side lot lines and shall be no ..
greater than lwenty-five {25) feed wide at the progerty line.,,
i .
The Mendota� I3eights City Cauncil had directed that an effort be made ta azrive at a mediated
neighborhood solutian ta the Zoning 4rdinance violation. Since the mediation has failed City
Council directed staffto once again pursue strict enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance.
Yau are hereby directed to bring your property into comptiance with City 2oning Ordiance 44I �
Sectian 4.18(5) no later than June 3Q, 1996.
�
Please feel free ta contact me if you have any prc�blems meeting this deadline, Thank you for yaur
anticipated cooperation.
i
Sincerety �, - 4
�� �� �
Pau2 R. Ber�
Cade Enforcement Of&cer
PRT3/!s
Enclosure
�
i
I �
i
i
I
�
1101 Victoria Curve • Mendata Heights, 1ViN • 5v118 452 • iSv4
si, t�
�
/
��
YY � ►�1 ►II � : :1 C
►�t�lu �
TO: Mayor, City Council and Cit� A or
� ' �
FROM: 7ames E. Danielson, Public,�VVorks D' t �
SUBJECT: Freeway Road1TH149 Right of Way Study
DATE: 5eptember 13, 1996 , -
'� � � -
DiSC'iTSSrnN: - � ;
At the August 6, 1996 meeting, Council authorized for up to 5 hours of Planners', time.
The Planner was to prepare for a workshop to consider ttie future land use of the vacant '
TH149 Right of Way and City owned property located immediately North of TH110. Planner
Meg McMonigal has submitted the attached information as the framework for workshop, she
also has prepared some maps that she will have available at the workshop for use ia the �
discussion. � -
RF.C'nM1VIF,NnATinN: �
I recommend that a workshop be scheduled to analyze the future use of the Dodd I .
Road/TH110 northeast quadrdnt. � _ � k -
AC'TTnN RFS,�iTiRF,n:
If Council desires to implement the recommendation they should set a date and time for
the workshop and determine who they want to attend it. `-
Sep,ll.1996 4.O7PM MGCO�BS �RANk R44S
No. �898 P. 4/4 �' . - „
:�
_,
�,
SIT'E PLAIVNING and DES1��N I'AIt�JVl��'E.riS ,
OveraZl 17esign � -
- S�Ze _
- A.rchi#ec�ure �- ._ , .
- Corr�a�unii� CTiaraeter
� Bu�ldirtgN�C'at�rials, Cotors, Height � �
.�igh�ing -
Ci�cuZtztioa�Access � � _ -
�idez�al�Csf1'raits - _ ._
Lltilities - � f � - .
.�rainage - _ � ,� .
+Jpen Spaces � � - .
�xistin,g'V'egetation . _ _ ,-
S��bucks -
.�mpervxous Su�ace -
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
September 13, 1996
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administrator
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson�I1,IS
City Clerk
SUBJECT: November 5 Council Meeting
INFORMATION
The November 5 City Council meeting falls on the date of the General Election. As you
are aware, public meetings are restricted before 8:00 p.m. on election da.ys. Council must
therefore either reschedule the meeting to start at a later time or reschedule the meeting to a
different day.
DISCUSSION
For the past several election years, Council has chosen to conduct the Council meeting on
the first Tuesda.y in November, starting the meeting at 8:00 p.m. Tlus has generally worked well
and poses no particulaz problems for election processing. Council should be aware however that
there will be election activity in the conference room and lobby areas of City Hall throughout the
evening.
If Council so desires, it can reschedule the meeting to a different date, perhaps in
conjunction with the election canvassing board meeting. Council must convene as a canvassing
board within two days after the election. Typically, the canvassing board has convened at 5:00
p.m. on the day after the election. If the regulaz meeting is rescheduled to within two days after
the election, Council could meet as the canvassing board before the commencement of the
regular meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that Council reschedule the starting time of the November 5 Council
meeting to 8:00 p.m.
ACTION REOUIRED
If Council concurs in the recommenda.tion, it should pass a motion to reschedule the
November 5, 1996 Council meeting to convene at 8:00 p.m.
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
September 6, 1996
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admi 'str r
.�.
FROM: Larry E. Shaughnessy: ��'
SUBJECT: December 3, Council Meeting & Truth-In-Taxation Hearing
. •:
We had planned to conduct our Truth-In-Taxation Hearing at our regular
December 3rd Council meeting, with the continuation and on subsequent hearing
for December 11, 1996 at 5:00 P.M.
�
We have received the schedule for other government units and have been
preempted by the School District for December 3.
Staff would suggest that we reschedule our December 3 Council meeting to
December 4, with the Truth-In-Taxation Hearing and the second meeting for
December 11 at 5:00 P.M.
�_[��I� ► : • : �
Reschedule the regular December 3 Council meeting to December 4 and the
second hearing for December 11.
inv..040 "A. ..asivaiyak..
ci -r 'tun* -4 CO •••",t...TF) ...F•XDUG:F") pr?co4.4. J4:1, auswaisime...
-410 ifdx-r ttietcopf- —
, . . . . . . . . . . .... .
: ..... . . . . .
• • .......
. • . • • .....
..... • .
......... ..
. : .
...
• • . . ... .
............ •
.....
• • .....
........
.....
.....
. . ' ....... .
... ..
..... • • ......
• • . . • ........
......... • ......
. • • • . ...... ..
.....
...
. • .....
'
• .......
• ..... • . •
. . •
. • . ..... • •
..... . • •
......
...... . . : ...
..... • • ......
: :
: . • .... .
...
... . . ......
....
.... . .. ; . • ......
.......... • • • . .....
. • .
.. : . ......
•
. • .....
... . . . .
...
..... . • .
1 • ..... • •
.... . ,
. • . . . • . : .... .
..... • • • • • ........ • . . • • • • • .................
. . ..... •
.... • . .. ; ......... : • • • . • J ...... .. :
....... ; ......... .
• • ....
..... • •
........ • • • • • • .....
• • • ...... ; . . .
• . . . .... . . . ....... • • . . . •
• • • . • • . • • • • • 0 • • • • • • ..... •
......
...
• • ....... .............. . • . • • • • • • • • • . •
• • • • • • • • . ..... • • . .....
• .....
• • ......
..... • • •
• . . . .
........
•
...
▪ . .... . ... . .
..... 7 . ......
.....
.....
...... . • . •
. . 4
. . • • • ..... •
.. . . . • • : . .
' • • • • - • ......
. . . . ...
..... .
...... ..... •
...... •
. . ....
, . t
• • • • •efce- ......... .
• • • . ........... . . • ..... . . .
. . : ...... :=.
........ /5," ....e. . . • • • . • • • .
...... • . .......... .
.... . . : . : .... : , . • • 7 S". • -• • .
... . . : . • .. • : .. • ... • ...S... .. •
........ . . ..
...
. • ......
... .... : . . ..... . ... . ..
..... • • . .
• •
•
• 1
...... • . .... - .
•
• •
. . ... • • • . : • : : ..... I'. ...
. . . . . : . • 1.
• . .
• . . • . • .....
: . ........
. . .... .
... • • . •
......
..... : :* : • . : . ... : . . . :
.... . . : • . /
... .
: cl?
..... . . .
• ...........
..... .. .... ... 1: • .
...... • .
• ... •
: .
• . • .. .. .
• : : /. : . : :
. : : . . •
...
• • • ..... . •
•
.....
• ... .........
...... • •
.... • • • • ....
....... • .
• • .........
. • . •
• ...... • • : •
. • • .....
....
.... • • • • •
...
........
• • ' • 45-4. '
‘111 • • •
• • - - • • •• .
• • - . • • ..... • . . • • • • ......
......
..... • ..
. • ......
. • .
. • ......
..
.....
........
..... • . •
• • .......
...
• ....
.... • •
.........
.....
.... • •
........ •
.... • . • . • • -
.. • ...... • .
....... •
. • • ........
• ..
...
.. •
• • .....
• ..
. . . .. ... ..... ..... .... . ... .
.......... . • • • • • - •
• ' : •
' ' .... - • .
• • ....
...... • • •
, . ..... .
• • • ...........
...................
..... • ....... . . ......... . , - ......
. • ' • • • • • ...
• . ...... • • • .....
....................... •
............ - . • _ ........
• .......
.....
........
• ..
.......
.. •
• ..... •
.......
...
........ . •
............
.....
• ..........
......... : ...
"
........
• ......
. . . . • .
• • ....... • .............
• • .....................
............. • •
.... • ... : . . . ..... . • • ..... •
• . - • ....... • • . ......... • • . • ..... . .
.......... ......... • ......... • • .
• . . • .. : ............
.. ...... I • • • • . • .........
.... • • ..... • .........
...... • .......... - • . • • • • - • • ....... • . •
• • ....... • . • ....
• • . ..... : ....... ....
..
. ......
...
... • ..... - • •
• • ......
. • • , ....
.................... • • • .
- • • • . • • ....
.........
........ • .
...... . :
- 1 .......... • ...... •
....
......... •
. .... . .*
- • ........
. • • .......... : .. .
..
• • • • ....... • • • ........
• • • . .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • ............. . • • • ..... • •
.. • ...... . • • • .
.... ... : .. . ...... .
• ..... • ..... .
.... • • • • .......
• - . • ..... ........ •
....... . • • . ............
• - • . ... . .... .
• ... • • . •
• ....
. , ..... . ...... . , • • . ............... ...........
........
....... • •
• 1 ....... • . • .
•
........ : ,
........ • •
........
........
- • • ....
...
....... • :
. ..
. ........
.......
........
. • • • ....... • .....
• ..... • • • • • • • ...... •
.......... •
• . • • .......
.. ... ...... , . • • • : • .. • -
: .
..
. • .
- • ' . , , • ... : .
......
.... • • • .
..... • • .......
. .... , ; • • . • . • • • • • • • • .
...
• .......
. • • ......
• ...... •
......... • . - • ....