Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1975-03-18
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Dakota County, Minnesota AGENDA March 18, 1975 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Approval of Minutes, March 4, 1975. 4. Abatements. (J. O'Toole will be present.) 06,0 -Aowt 5. Approval of final payment for Park Development Project 2. (Excluding $1,000 of Item 23, to be retained until spring. See attached.) 6. Communications. a. Excerpt from Metropolitan Housing Bulletin, February, 1975. b. Letter from Somerset Heights PTA regarding recycling. 7. Department Reports a. Police Department monthly report, February, 1975. 8. New Business Public Mayor City Administrator a. Memo on Vote -A -Matic election equipment. b. Memo on Amendment to Personnel Code Resolution. (See attached proposed resolution.) c. Aerial Photography Proposals. (See attached report from Ed Kishel. Additional information available Tuesday evening.) c% �1/oa-Ae. TRx AEv,Es e4WAr-#?tA.1omu7e Trustees e, 'EXct p11 Zso ig-/ 8u/(e4'1-) �¢I�.✓ooui� -(� Mewto on A_ w. (N-ANoouT_) City Engineer g' Fea. EE✓t�u� S, ,e,NG Srfttus 2Eooer �(�,4,veau7� City Attorney Clerk -Treasurer Q. F'if1�'c/�4c STnTEME.v9 �E/s� /97S CHIt.Jb01t7J 9. Approval of the List of Claims. t 10. Approval of Cigarette License: Hannigan's Kwik Shop. 11. Approval of Licenses: H. Runge Construction Kitchens by Krengel 12. Adjourn. General Contractor License General Contractor License. I.,IS`i' OF C'i,%%I' S SL'Bhil'i"iED TO TJIL COU-4CIL FOR APPROVAL PROJIiC'TS 1.80 1.32 $ 7,425.00 -098 72.98 313 3/ oao, Do ..313 Ioo, poo.©o P.I,RIC BO",D ISSUE 3133 $� 140.00 3089 23,432.00 PAYROLL 3033 �$ 9,117.75 ADS-_ILNI S l P.Ai' ION 3090 $ 1.80 3091 865.24 3092 88.76 3093 121.50 3094 51.91 3095 5.68 3096 3.00 3097 50.00 3098 106.99 1099 15.81 100 13.01 3101 320.00 POLICE DEPARTMENT 3102 $ 2.00 3103 17.52 3104 2.04 3105 246.27 3106 4.00 3107 112.00 3108 5.00 3109 158.21 FIRE DEPARTMENT 3099 $ 162.95 3110 80.90 3111 2.1.00' 3112 2.28 3113 182.01 3114 690.00 .s115 332.30 3116 6.00 Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc. Sun Newspapers /yl/N NE501�1 �C/JE�2Hl. $ft✓lN6S / �tl A.J Department of Natural Resources Henry O. Mikkelson mid America State Bank Coast to Coast Stores Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn. Wells Fargo Trustee United Fund Shaw Lumber Company Suburban Stationers Munici-Pals, Sue Sa�•Yyer, Treas. American Public Works Assoc. Sun Newspapers INTorthwestern Bell Kathleen P: iahoney Midwest Planning & Research, Inc. Fischer's "66" City 1,1otor Supply Co., Inc. Glohe Publishing Co. Standard Oil Division Gene Lange Market Tire Company Peter Beberg Fury Motors Northwestern Bell I1obile Radio Engineering, Inc. Crawford Door Sales, Co. Freds Parts Center, Inc. Minnesota Fire Incorporated Leonard J. Perron Mobile Radio Engineering, Inc. Oxygen Service Co. ?larch 18, 1075 Partial payment 73--2 Publishing S.ddcsTME�uTS �-�-� Beach permit Partial.payment Cert.9 Net Payroll 3/15/75 Supplies Hospitalization LTD & Life Insurance Employee contributions Const. material Office supplies Dues for 1975-76 Membership fee Publishing ordinances Billings Mileage & parking exp. Retainer & •fees Bead lamp Repairs Office supplies Gasoline Identification Asso. dues for 1975 Tires Minn. Crime Asso. dues Repairs Billings Repairs Repairs Repairs Clothing Snow plowing firemen's driveways. Repairs Oxygen LIS`1' OF CLAIMS (CON'T) ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT 1117 $ 125.05 northern Propane Gas Co. 102 56.50 Fischer's "66", 3118 122.80 International Harvester Co. 3119 27.83 Kar Products 3090 1.23 Coast to Coast Stores 3103 113.79 City Motor Supply Co., Inc. 3105 445.13 Standard Oil Division 3120 57.15 " Zinnesota (lining & Manufacturing 3099 35.55 Northwestern Bell PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 3121 6.99 Chermak Tire Company 3099 23.40 Northwestern Bell 3119 34.57 Kar Products 3116 9.00 Oxygen Service Co. 3122 37.85 Shields Gas & Electric Co. 3123 18.00 ;Mendota Heights Rubbish Service 3124 7,114.13 'Metropolitan Waste Control Comm. 3125 48.00 City of West St. Paul 3126 5.40 Occupational Training Center, Inc. 3127 222.79 Northern States Power Co. 3128 92.47 Garwood Twin Cities ARKS DEPAR'T'MENT 3129 $ 41.08 3130 39.55 3131 219.65 3090 7.89 3123 12.00 3127 205.82 Service 'fires & repairs Renairs ReDairs Supplies Repairs Gasoline & diesel fuel Repair parts Billings Repairs Billings Repairs Oxygen Renairs Service Sexier Service charge 1975 Alarm rental Supplies Billings Repairs United Electric Corporation Repairs Aquazyme Iidwest, Inc. Rental units Delta Chemical Weed Killer Coast to Coast Stores Supplies (Mendota Heights Rubbish Service Service Northern States Power Co. Billings Page 493 March 4, 1975 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, March 4, 1975 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 8:00 o'clock P.M. at the City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Acting Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Acting Mayor Lockwood, Councilmen Gutzmer, Losleben and Wahl. Mayor Huber had notified the Council he would be out of town. APPROVE MINUTES Acting Mayor Lockwood moved the approval of the minutes of the December 23, 1974 meeting. Councilman Gutzmer seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Councilman Wahl moved approval of the minutes of the February 18 meeting. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 LEXINGTON HIGHLAND After a brief discussion of the proposed Lexington Highland EAST/WEST East and West improvements, Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Resolution No. 75-20, "RESOLUTION ORDERING CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE THE LEXINGTON HIGHLAND ADDITIONS AND ADJACENT AREAS AND ORDERING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS THEREFOR (IMPROVEMENT NO. 74, PROJECT NO. 3)." Councilman Wahl seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 FINAL PLAT, City Administrator Johnson stated that there are two proposed CHERRY HILLS agreements in process regarding the Cherry Hills Second SECOND ADDITION Addition plat. One of the agreements is between NSP, the Alzada Corporation and the City; the other agreement is a Developers Agreement. City Attorney Winthrop explained the NSP agreement. The agreement would authorize NSP to purchase five of the westerly lots adjacent to the NSP property and this option ,will -expire on July 1, 1976. As part of the agreement, by July 1 if the noise level at the easterly boundary of the NSP property is not 50 decibels or less NSP must exercise its purchase option. In general, the agreement provides that NSP will plant some scfeening oh -the -boundary -between the NSP property and the five lots; they will take the necessary steps to reduce the noise level. 14 he - ev i G acct Yo.ai9L-d ,to See deelbels. eE less by July 1, 1976 NSP will grant- the City (at no consideration) an easement across its property J Page 494 March 4, 1975 for sanitary and storm sewer construction. Mr. Winthrop explained the portions of the agreement dealing with assessments. He also stated that if NSP purchases the property, they will have the right to transfer the property to the City. The City would then maintain the property as a wooded buffer area but will have the right to establish a trailway or bikeway, etc. on the property. Prior to July 1, 197E NSP and the developer will jointly retain an expert to determine the noise level. Councilman Wahl moved approval of the final plat for the Cherry Hills Second Addition, contingent upon the execution of the appropriate (satisfactory) agreements prior to signing of the plat. Councilman Gutzmer seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 ANIMAL HOSPITAL Mr. Granger Whitney, of Lander Construction Company and Dr. Thomas Koepke presented final building plans for the Koepke Animal Hospital. Landscape plans were not submitted with the building plans. The Council members pointed out that if the building permit is approved, it will remain valid only if satisfactory landscaping plans are submitted to the Council. After a brief discussion, Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Resolution No. 75-21, "RESOLUTION APPROVING BUILDING PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ANIMAL HOSPITAL FOR THOMAS E. KOEPKE." Councilman Wahl seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 DEPOSITORY OF The Council acknowledged receipt of a letter from Minnesota FUNDS Federal Savings regarding public unit accounts and interest rates. Administrator Johnson recommended that Minnesota Federal be authorized as a depository of City funds. Acting Mayor Lockwood moved that Minnesota Federal be approved as a depository of City funds, for 1975. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 COMMUNICATIONS The Council acknowledged receipt of a notice from School District 197 regarding a public hearing on the proposed Delaware Avenue pedestrian way. The hearing is to be held on March 10. The Council acknowledged receipt of a letter from the Mendota Water Company in response to five items raised by the Council at the December 9, 1974 meeting. Page 495 March 4, 1975 DEPARTMENT The Council acknowledged receipt of the Fire Department REPORTS monthly report for January, 1975. PLANNING The Council acknowledged receipt of the minutes of the COMMISSION February 26 Planning Commission meeting. CASE NO. 75-2, Mr. Terry Kallin was present to discuss his application for KALLIN a variance from the sideyard setback requirement for 703 Second Avenue. After a brief discussion, Councilman Gutzmer moved that a six-foot variance from the thirty-foot sideyard setback requirement at 703 - 2nd Avenue be approved. Councilman Wahl seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 74-20, Mr. Dick Sheehy was present to request approval of a conditional SHEEHY use permit to grade property on the southeast corner of Dodd Road and Highway 110. Mr. Sheehy outlined his proposed plans for the fill, ponding and fencing of the site. The Council discussed the drainage proposal. Councilman Losleben objected to fencing around the ponding area and suggested a 5:1 slope on the sides of the ponding area rather than the proposed 2:1 slope. Councilman Losleben pointed out that if the area is fenced it will become a collection spot for debris. Mr. Sheehy pointed out that it will be his responsibility to maintain the area and he will keep it as clean as possible. After a lengthy discussion of the drainage, ponding area and fence, Acting Mayor Lockwood directed Mr. Sheehy and the staff to contact the Minnesota Highway Department regarding the necessity for fencing and to work with Hickok and Associates to attempt to find an alternate solution to the 2:1 slope. CASE NO. 75-1, Mr. Lance Peterson was present to request the Council to PETERSON reconsider his application for a variance to build on an undersized lot, Lots 8 and 9, Block 2, Mortenson's Addition. The matter had been considered at the January 21 Council meeting. Mr. Peterson stated that he has obtained a survey of the property and that he feels he should not be required to pay any back taxes or assessments on this tax -forfeit property prior to granting of the variance. Councilman Losleben moved that the matter be referred back to the Planning Commission and directed Mr. Peterson to prepare a sketch, for presentation to the Planning Commission, showing the proposed situation of a house on the lot and adhering to the required setbacks. Councilman Wahl seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Page 496 March 4, 1975 ROGERS LAKE The Council acknowledged receipt of a report on the Park BEACH EXPANSION Bond Issue status and Administrator Johnson outlined the report. He stated that both acquisition and development of property for the Ivy Hills Park and the expansion of the Rogers Lake beach could be accomplished within the balance of the Park Bond fund. He stated that it is proposed to expand the beach by 180 feet, on the east side of the presently improved beach area. He stated that informal quotations for dredging have been received from G.L. Contracting, in the amount of $2,500 and from A. Kamish and Sons, in the amount of $5,165.50. As part of the G.L. Contracting proposal, the City will purchase the necessary sand and will transport it to the beach area. Councilman Gutzmer moved the approval of the suggested beach expansion plans. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 MISCELLANEOUS Engineer Kishel advised the Council that bids for the Orchard/Hunter Lane improvements will be received on April 1. The Council directed the City Administrator and Attorney to prepare a press release on Marie Avenue construction. FEASIBILITY The Council acknowledged receipt of the feasibility report for REPORT proposed Clement/Vandall'area improvements. WORK MEETING The Council established a joint Council/Planning Commission special work meeting to be held on March 13 at 7:30 P.M. at City Hall for a discussion of the Surface Water Management Study and proposed Clement/Vandall area improvements. ENGINEERING STATUS The Council acknowledged receipt of the Engineering Status REPORT Report for February, 1975. LIST OF CLAIMS Acting Mayor Lockwood moved the adoption of the following motion: _ RESOLVED, that the claims submitted to the City Council for payment, a summary of which is set forth on the list attached hereto and identified as List of Claims submitted for payment, March 4, 1975, having been audited by the City Council, be and are hereby allowed and the Mayor and Clerk -Treasurer are hereby authorized and directed to issue City checks in payment of said claims. Councilman Wahl seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 LICENSES Councilman Wahl moved approval of the list of licenses, granting license to: Langer Construction Company General Contractor License Councilman Gutzmer seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Page 497 y March 4, 1975 ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilman Gutzmer moved that the meeting be adjourned. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:16 o'clock P.M. G.M. Radabaugh Clerk -Treasurer } ATTEST: Robert G. Lockwood Acting Mayor ABATEMENTS - - March 10, 1975 • �' Real Estate: Approved State of Minnesota Hiway Dept. After investigation of this property it was • #27-71250-160-01 found that this property is owned by the State ' 2,70- of Mn Highway Hiway Dept. and therefore should be exempt property. Reduce from 266 in 1971 to nil, reduce from 946 in 1972 to nil, -and reduce from 1118 in 1973 to nil for taxes payable in 1972 and 1973 and 1974. p Harold D. Keturakat After reviewing this property it.was found that #27-71250-070-01 the value should have been nil since it is 1 b owned by the Mpls. St. Paul Metro Airport. Reduce from 680- to nil for taxes payable in 1975. Allen J. 0'R ke After reviewing this pr-)perty and obtaining �✓f #27535-36 7ox- more information on the property from the City oaq- aa400- of Mendota Heights, we find these three lots (& o- �u- �3 to be over -valued. They should be reduced. a - a Reduce from 602 on #27535 to 430, reduce from 602 on parcel #27536 & 37 to 430 for taxes payable in 1974, DEAN AVE. 7637 27683 LANE 763 x76321 CQ 763 7 6 53 12 1-8 ZAV -15 C 9 10 12 13 14 4 3 2�*) 2 8 63� 63%P706 F76fl :?- 7(-,02-27441 �7" KEN VICTORY DON V E. 7*2ti --6 5 I 10 12 13 14 15 2 Z5:')76zV I - SOU U e- T H a) 6 7 8 9 lo II Z 7,.? 7&Zci 7(,23� .774.�c 7x25 N' cn LE MAY AVE. DEAN AVE. 7637 27683 LANE 763 x76321 CQ 763 7 6 53 12 1-8 ZAV -15 C 9 10 12 13 14 4 3 2�*) 2 8 63� 63%P706 F76fl :?- 7(-,02-27441 �7" DEAN AVE. GOV. LOT I AVE. 65 -F URLONG AVE, N G E, 3� A 19:4 t 1 1 4 12 1-8 ZAV -15 6 5ptl 4 3 2�*) 70 8 KEN DON cr GOV. LOT I AVE. LAKEVIEW AVE. N 5) 5 8 7s 5 4 65 '5' 4 I 3� A 19:4 t 1 1 4 12 1-8 14 -15 16 1"a r3 LAKEVIEW AVE. N 5) 5 8 7s 5 4 VI CTOR T AVE 1771,z/ ;7o6 m63:) ;71 M AN E Z: -?74166 2 74, I.:r 7 6 5, 4 31-3 2 7-7 10 12 2 12 13 14 94 10 r1 12 13 14 .15 16 7176 U oGGZ72 TH A z ir .774 *):7 -ISZ9 51 3 2 1 6 7 8 9 10 LE MAY AVE. 63 17F ;7o6 m63:) 276*3* Ll AN E Z: 76,32 - i 0 -9 6'8 76 7 6 5 I 5. 4 31-3 2 7-7 10 12 2 12 13 14 M-lf _1 0 700 76¢/ � X P2. 07641 -;276 0� N N ^10, -F U R L 0 N V - DEAN AVE. 8 KENDON cr C�2 (o 14Z -4 LAKEYIEW AVE. 170 k -O N� (7 6 I 5. 4 A 3" P-�• 191 I t 12 I 14 it< 15 fo 16 N, tx LAKEYIEW AVE. I N� 5 8 7 6 5__I_ 4 R 11, t. I V i_ U MR b 1975 BECKMAN YODER and S EAY I N C planners and landscape architects pittsburgh fort wayne saint paul March 3, 1975 Mr. Orvil Johnson, Administrator City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Saint Paul, Minnesota 55120 Re: Park Development Project No. 2 Dear Mr. Johnson: I am enclosing approved payment request number 9 for the Park Development Project No. 2. This request included payment of the retained percentage on all contract items except item 23 - Lan dscape Planting. Final approval on the Landscape Planting item will be made this spring after any required plant material replacement has been made. The contract documents for this project provide for issuance of final pay- ment aifter correction.of any contract work deficiencies and after submission of satisfactory evidence that all payrolls, material:b.il,ls and other indebted- ness connected with the work have been satisfied by the contractor. All identified deficiencies for this contract have been connected to the satis- faction of the landscape architect, City Staff and the Park Commission. The following evidence of indebtedness satisfaction is attached and in the opinion of the landscape architect provides satisfactory assurances that all indebtedness connected with the project has been paid. Contract Amount Line Item 5 Excavation & Rough Grading 6,7 Trenching and Dragline, & 20 Site Drainage and Water Hydrant 8,9 Gravel Roads & Parking, & 10 Bituminous Tennis and Parking Paving 11 Tennis Court Seal Coat 12 Fencing 14 Guard Posts 18 Benches 19 Play Apparatus 21 Electrical 22 Pavilions 23 Landscape Planting & 25 Sodding & Seeding 26 Lumber Subcontractor or Su 'lier usse ons ruc ion G.L. Contracting Minnesota Valley Surfacing L.M. Sickels Co. United States Steel St. Regis Paper Co. Landscape Structures Inc. Bartley Sales Co. Electric Service Co. Structural Wood Corp. Gene Ramsay Al's Landscaping G.M. Stewart Lumber Co. C.O. #3 Rogers Lake Beach Northwestern Gravel Co. 366 Jackson street saint paui, minnesota 55109 612-225 3354 Lien Waiver Amount 8,590.50 20,359.33 31,790.00 5,116.58 13,663.00 2,432.21 877.20 1,739.19 1,987.00 2,021.16 10,562.90 7,264.00 3,349.61 871.97 Mr. Orvil Johnson, Administrator City of Mendota Heights March 3, 1975 Page Two In addition, the contractor has submitted an affidavit indicating all wages paid to his employees associated with the contract were subjected to withholding in accordance with M.S.A. 290.91. Sincerely yours, BECKMAN, YODER AND SEAY, INC. Lee Starr, District Director LS/ps cc: Larry Ridenour Enclosure Excerpt from Minutes, November 5, 1974: FINAL PAYMENT Park Planner Starr recommended that the contractor for PARK PROJECT Park Project No. 2 construction be authorized to submit for NO. 2 processing his certificate for final payment for work completed on the park project. He recommended that $1,000 be retained from the final payment until the spring of 1975 so that the - Planner can make sure that the planted materials are well-established, healthy and have survived the winter. HENRY O. MIkKELSO ' :•i: I ' ! :+� ; : , GENERAL CONTRACTOR :f _ 20 West 59th St. - Minneapolis 19, Minn. PERIODICAL ESTUNATE PARTIAL PAYMENT No. #9 Date 14arch 1, 1975 June -1, 1974 Diarch 1, 1975 orthe period.................................................................................. to ...................................................................... inclusive Name of project ............ PARK DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2 ....................................................................................................................................... Owner VILLAGE OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA ............................................................................................................................................................................................ Item Description Amount of Amount of Amount of Total Estimate Perce<<t No. Tocol Contract Previous Estimate This Estimate to Date Compipt- (1) (�) (3) (4) (3) (6) '(7) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 i j6 17 18 19 20 21' 22 23 24 25 26 C.O. #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 Performance Bond Mobilization Insurance, Taxes, etc. Site Preparation and layout Excavation & rough grading Trenching and dragline Site Drainage Gravel Roads & Parking Bituminous tennis paving Bituminous parking paving Tennis court sealcoat Fencing Wood Chip Trails Guard Posts Channel Wall Foot bridges (8) Signs Benches (7) Play Apparatus Mechanical -Water hydrant Electrical Pavilions (2) Landscape Planting Sodding Seeding Misc. Hardware, lumber Rogers Canoe Channel 14arie Slope Grading Rogers Beach & Channel Time of Completion Misc Extrax&s & Credits $ 2,000 2,000 8,000 4,000 50,,000 22,000 5,000 20,000 16,000 1,000 8,000 20,000 2,000 5,000 4,000 5,000 600 1,400 3,000 4,000 3,000 14,000 _10,000 2,000 12,000 5,000 No Change 2, 500 No Change No Change 1.,31+2 2000 2000 8000 4000 50000 22000 5000 20000 16000 1000 8000 20000 2000 5000 4000 5000 600 1+00 3000 4000 3000 14000 10000 2000 12000 5000 2000 2000 8000 4000 50000 22000 5000 20000 16000 1000 8000 20000 2000 5000 5 00 600 1400 3000 4000 3000 1-000 10000 2000 12000 5000 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 10p0 00 1 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 2500 I 2500 100 1342 1342 100 Totals 232,842 ! 231,500 I 3 1342 9 232, 842 N l 1 - V I I CONTRACT RECAPITULATION Date March1, .... 1975 ............................. Contract amount - - - - _ - _ _ $229, 000 Extras approved to date _ :...............3�.g.!.2.................. Creditsapproved to date - - - - - - -................................................ Net contract this date - - - - - - - - ...• .234842 ...... CERTIFICATE OF THE CONTRACTOR OR HIS DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE To the best of my knowledge and belief, I certify that all items, units, quantities, and prices of work and material shown on this Pericdi- Estimate are correct; that all work has been performed and materials supplied in full accordance ,Nith the terms and conditions of the Mendota Heights O. :�i? KELSOti HENRYt .............. i... corresnnndilig construction contract documents between...........,....................................................................... and....................................................... ........, July 3 1973 (Owner) (Contractor) dated ....... ...................t................................ and all authorized changes thereto; that the following is a true and correct statement of the contract account up !a and including the last day cf the period covered by this estimate. (a) Total amount earned (col. 5).................................................................. S........2328/+...00.................. ch) 10% Landscaping & Planting 000.00 Retained pert tage...... .... $ j cTotal earned less retained percentage ............................... ..................... $ ........................................................231 842.00 a (d) Total previously approv^_d.........:........................................................:.... $ ........ 23,492.00 (e) Aniount due this cs!io:ate............................................................................$ ........................................................ , ............HENRY O. WKKELSO� ,..........,.... .. ............................................................ ................... - - - - - -- 11� .i,s�cC....... Dote 3 • ,*,****** CERTiFICATF OF THE Ob''NFR'S ARCHITECT T certife tC]t this PcriCp"ical Esti:nat,:, to the best of my knowledge ai:; belief, is a true and correct :,tatcin-mt of work pT"iorrlwd 1:''•1 by the et•ntr: ctor, and 'hat the contra.:ui's eercified _tale:r:ere of :.:s aecr.:•t•t and the amount d.::_ hint is cor: eet iai.'• i :••t, -flut all •. o,k and mite ial inC u&d.,., in this Ytrl!. i.itC2i Es"inate haze leen perf�-mcd in full accordance with the ,°err:i and crodir,'n, of s t - er.;rrcet.andiug c,ristr:iction cow.-actc,cruraects ar.d authorized changes t;i:rrto. ' B-c:,.roan, YOd ;r ano ':Pay, ► ic. JoCF:SOri Si rel:-` ................................................... Sy............................................:.................... ........................ r:aue ........... ... .`'/ F�itt: I , �' i n wl ....,.t' 1., �..................... .................. . ..y - o Q�09�h�`OQ�� J i a e" GoJ��Q e`\F too e`�o J° 66 _`V11 NOTE TO COUNCIL: You should know what they're saying about us! Most all grants are based (to some degree) on "Housing scores." As you can see, we're rather low on the ranking list. If and when people talk about making application for a grant for some very worth while cause, please remind yourself, and them, that the efforts would probably be more productive if applied to local projects. Unless directed otherwise, I do not intend to spend much time analyzing, or applying for federal grants. O.J.J. 3/5/75 FX I New Refined Procedures Adopted for Policy 31 In December, 1974, the Metropolitan Council adopted new refined procedures for applying Housing Policy 31, which attempts to reward com- munities for providing a full range of housing opportunities. Policy 31, contained in the revised Housing Chap- ter of the Metropolitan Development Guide, states: "In reviewing applications for funding assistance, high priority will be assigned to those governmental units that have codes and ordinances which provide for low -and -moderate income housing, and that are providing or have definite plans for low -and -moderate income housing." The new, procedures for applying Policy 31 will be included in the appendix of the Housing Chapter. The revision to the appendix will outline the crite- ria by which housing performance will be evaluated, the'weight given to each factor, and the ranking of each community in the seven -county Metropolitan Area as of January, 1975. The revised appendix will also detail how the Policy 31 rankings will be applied to establish overall Council priorities for funding and procedures for making amendments as communities ' undertake new initiatives in housing. The revisions were adopted after extensive local participation: four public meetings were held and communities received information on the proposed changes on three occasions. Policy 31 applies to all local applications for state or federal funding for community development proj- ects, criminal justice, ' parks and open space, and aging, among others. The policy does not apply to housing applications, since priorities for these funds are determined according to the Housing Allocation Plan in the Housing Chapter. Also, the policy applies only on applications from public agencies and local governmental units when the funds applied for would be expended in a single municipality. Applications from private groups and organizations are exempt from Policy 31, as are applications from rural areas. It is felt that the revisions make applying Policy 31 more objective. The revised system eliminates label- ing communities "acceptable" or "unacceptable" based on their housing efforts. Now it is also clear that Policy 31 is not an absolute override. It is a major factor in determining priorities for -applica- tions in parks and open space, criminal justice, and other programs; however, it does not, by itself, out- weigh the individual merits of an application. The evaluation criteria listed on page 3 show what factors the Council considers in evaluating a com- munity's housing performance. Page 5 lists the points accumulated from the evaluation criteria. The rankings will be revised January 1 of each year, prior to each funding cycle, as well as when communities undertake new initiatives in providing low -and - moderate income housing. Policy 31 Evaluation Criteria Maximum Points 2) Entered into a cooperation agreement with another EXISTING HOUSING SUPPLY local HRA or county HRA to carry out low income housing programs In the community; or Low Income 1 to 10 3) Entered into a cooperation agreement with Metro Municipalities ranked according to per cant of total HRA to carry out low income housing programs in housing in price range affordable by low income per- the community. sons. (Units renting for $119 or less, or valued at $12,500 or less, 1970 Census.) In addition, the per cent of substandard units is sub- tracted, and the per cent of mobile homes is added to arrive at a total percentage. Moderate Income Municipalities ranked according to per cent of total housing in price range affordable by moderate income persons. (Units renting for $199 or less, or valued at $19,999 or less, 1970 Census.) EXISTING SUBSIDIZED HOUSING Low Income Municipalities ranked according to percent of subsidized units constructed, purchased, or approved by the fund- ing agency for construction or purchase in the com- munity for low income and/or disabled persons, adult offenders, or adjudicated delinquents. Response to Family Needs Communities which have one per cent or more of total housing stock available for low income persons may receive an additional five points if 20 per cent or more of such housing is designated as family units. Moderato Income MunicipLJ:ties rank according to per cent of subsidized units constructed or approved by Area Office of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for construction for moderate income persons. (Includes Section 735, 236 and 2210.) Response to Family Needs Communities which have one per cent or more of total housing stock available as moderate income subsi- dized units may receive an additional five points if 20 per cent or more of such housing are units with two bedrooms or more for non -elderly families. PROPOSED SUBSIDIZED HOUSING PROJECT Project or application for subsidy funds approved by governing body of municipality within past two years, but rejected by HUD or still awaiting HUD decision. HOUSING AND REDEVOPMENT AUTHORITY Community has: 1) Established a local HRA and appointed a Board of Commissioners. If an HRA is established, but subse- quently the terms of appointment expire without reappointment, and Board meets infrequently, if at all, the HRA is considered inactive and points would not be awarded; or CODES AND ORDINANCES Points allowed for provisions in existing codes and ordinances which facilitate low -and -moderate income 1 to 10 housing including: — Planned Unit Development Ordinance (i.e. provisions within zoning ordinance or as separate ordinance which permit flexibility in density and type of dwell- ings within designated areas). — Specific provisions for low -and -moderate cost hous- ing (i.e. percentage requirements for subsidized units in large developments; specific variance of certain 1 to 10 code items for subsidized developments, including reduction in parking or garage requirements, or floor area, or lot requirements). 1to10 — Housing maintenance code adopted. — Active code enforcement, urban renewal, or other program to eliminate substandard houbing. HOUSING PLANS (As contained in a municipal comprehensive plan, adopted municipal resolution, or housing assistance plan as part of a Community Development Application.) — Policies directed toward diverse housing costs and types (i.e. for a broad range of incomes and family sizes, and, in particular, for low -and -moderate in- come families). — Quantifiable housing goals (i.e. projected numbers of housing units needed by size and type of unit for families and elderly, as well as moderate income, taking into account metropolitan as well as local needs. These may be short or long range goals). — Specific implementation program (i.e. identification of detailed programs, plans, strategies, and timing for the use of federal, state, or local level, public or private resources necessary to meet the housing goals. These may be short as well as long range programs, but should relate clearly to the achieve- ment of identified goals). LOCALLY FUNDED EFFORTS TO LOWER HOUSING COSTS Efforts or actions which reduce housing costs for low - and -moderate income persons, but which are not cov- ered in the criteria outlined above (i.e. using local funds from mill levy or revenue sharing to operate a leased housing program, or to write-down land costs or improvement costs which then facilitates the con- struction of housing within the price range of low - and -moderate income persons). Total Maximum Points 100 3 Community Rankings Based on Revised Policy 31 Criteria January 2, 1975 Minneapolis .....................95 *Benton Township ................18 *Sand Creek Township ............14 St. Paul ........................95 *Castle Rock Township ............18 Spring Park .....................14 St. Louis Park ...................62 Chanhassen .....................18 *Waconia Township ...............14 Chaska ........................50 *Hampton .......................18 *Belle Plaine Township ............13 *Forest Lake ....................50 *Hollywood Township .............18 *Carver .........................13 South St. Paul...................48 Little Canada ....................18 *Cedar Lake Township ............13 Mound .........................45 Mendota Heights.18M a *Corcoran .......................13 Bloomington ....................44 *Vermillion Township .............18 Cottage Grove ..................13 Oakdale ........................44 *Watertown Township .............18 *Denmark Township ...............13 Robbinsdale ....................43 *Camden Township ...............17 *Forest Lake Township ............13 *Rosemount .....................43 *Coates .........................17 Hilltop .........................13 Anoka ..........................42 *Dayton .........................17 *Bethel .........................12 Maplewood .....................41 *Grey Cloud Township ............17 *Centerville ......................12 North St. Paul...................41 *Lake Elmo ......................17 Falcon Heights ..................12 Stillwater .......................41 *Lake St. Croix Beach .............17 *Greenfield ......................12 Hastings ........................40 *Marshan Township ...............17 *Jackson Township ...............12 *Farmington .....................39 *Randolph .......................17 *Loretto .........................12 Coon Rapids ....................38 Roseville .......................17 *Marine -on -St. Croix ..............12 Hopkins ........................38 St. Anthony .....................17 *May Township ...................12 Inver Grove Heights ..............38 *St. Bonifacius ...................17 *Meisville .......................12 *Waconia .......................38 *San Francisco Township ..........17 Mendota ........................12 *Lakeville .......................37 Arden Hills .....................16 *St. Lawrence Township ...........12 Eagan ......:...................36 *Cologne ........................16 *Spring Lake Township ............12 Blaine ..........................35 *Dahlgren Township ..............16 *Waterford Township ..............12 Burnsville ......................34 *East Bethel .....................16 *Blakely Township ................11 Columbia Heights ................34 *Hamburg .......................16 *Eureka Township .................11 Brooklyn Center .................33 *Ham Lake ......................16 *Helena Township ................11 Minnetonka .....................33 *Hampton Township ...............16 *Louisville Township ..............11 New Brighton ...................33 *Hanover ........................16 *Rockford .......................11 Shakopee ......................33 M ahtomedi .....................16 *New Market ..................... 11 White Bear Lake .................33 Maple Grove ....................16 *New Market Township ............11 Circle Pines .....................32 *Maple Plain .....................16 *New Trier .......................11 Golden Valley ...................32 *New Germany ...................16 *Rogers .........................11 Richfield .......................31 Savage .........................16 Victoria .......................11 West St. Paul....................31 *Young America ..................16 Woodbury ......................11 Eden Prairie ....................30 Bayport ........................15 *Andover ........................10 Brooklyn Park ...................28 *Empire Township ................15 *Baytown Township ...............10 Willernie .......................27 *Grant Township .................15 *Burns Township .................10 Newport ........................26 Greenwood .....................15 *Independence ...................10 *Watertown ......................26 *Lakeland .......................15 Landfall ........................10 Wayzata ........................26 *Linwood Township ...............15 Shorewood .....................10 *Lino Lakes .....................25 Medicine Lake ..................15 *Greenvale ...................... 9 Moundsview ....................25 New Hope ......................15 *Laketown Township .............. 9 St. Paul Park ...................25 Plymouth .......................15 *Medina....................... :. 9 Spring Lake Park ................25 *Ramsey ................:.......15 *West Lakeland Township .......... 9 *Vermillion ......................25 *Randolph Township ..............15 Birchwood ...................... 8 Edina ..........................24 *St. Francis ......................15 Tonka Bay ...................... 8 Lauderdale .....................24 *St. Mary's PoLnt ..................15 *Minnetrista ..................... 7 Oak Park Heights ................24 Shoreview ......................15 *Afton .......................... 6 Lexington .......................23 *Stillwater Township ..............15 *Columbus Township ............. 6 Apple Valley ....................22 White Bear Township .............15 *Lakeland Shores ................. 6 *New Scandia Township ...........22 *Douglas Township ...............14 Orono .......................... 6 *New Prague .....................21 *Elko ...........................14 *Prior Lake ...................... 6 Vadnais Heights .................21 Gem Lake ......................14 *Ravenna Township ............... 6 *Young America Township .........21 *Hassan Township ................14 *Credit River Township............. 4 Excelsior .......................20 *Hugo ..........................14 Deephaven ..................... 4 Crystal .........................20 Long Lake ......................14 *Sciota Township ................. 4 Fridley .........................20 *Mayer ..........................14 Woodland ...................... 4 *Hancock Township ...............20 Minnetonka Beach ...............14 Dellwood ....................... 3 Champlin .......................19 *Nininger Township ...............14 Pine Springs .................... 3 *Chaska Township ................19 *Norwood .......................14 North Oaks ..................... 2 *Jordan .........................19 '"Oak Grove Township .............14 Sunfish Lake .................... 0 *Belle Plaine .....................18 Osseo ..........................14 *Indicates a 4th Priority community according to the Council's housing allocation plan where development is not encouraged, and where subsidized housing, in particular, would receive low priority due to the insufficient level of services and facilities (unless it were to be part of a large-scale "new town"). Some communities may be designated as 3rd Priority or as fra'-standing in accordance with Development Framework Policy Plan in the near future. 4 SOMERSET HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL �'�� 'CI1J!_0r 1355 Codd Road St. Paul, Minnesota 5511$ March 12, 1975�� 3 �97� It is with regret that we inform you that we will not be holding our Spring Recycling Drive. We are planning a "Newspapers Only" Drive in I"lay. Since this now is our only fund raising source, please make every effort to save your newspapers. Metropolitan Recycling who have provided us with the semi -trailers to transport our materials and paid us for them, has found it financially impossible to continue under the present conditions. Metro -Recycling was subsidized for two years by Coca Cola Company and Hamm's, and at the end of that time they were either supposed to make it on their own financially or obtain Government assist- ance. Neither of which happened. Tim MacDonald from Metro, said there were a couple of alternatives we could consider and work toward. One would be having the City of Mendota Heights buy a used semi -trailer for hauling the recycleable materials from various Mendota heights sites (Somerset, Royal Redeemer Lutheran Church, Oakdale School, etc.). The other suggestion was to have the city provide a paved, landscaped area where all the interested people of Mendota heights could bring their materials at their convenience. Air. MacDonald suggested further that we contact our city officials to stress to them the need for a solution to our recycling problem. This would have been our fifth Spring Recycling Drive and it would be a tremen- dous step backward for us to begin to throw away our reusable materials again. A solution for the immediate problem of your stored bottles and cans is to take them to either Metra -Recycling Center, 666 Pelham Blvd., in Saint Paul or to the rear of the C. J. Nelson residence at 1352 Summit Avenue, Saint Paul or to the Dakota County Developmental Learning Center, 680 Blue Gentian Road, Eagan. The Somerset Heights P.T.A. Conservation Committee Marie Miller, Chairperson We have prepared, for your m nve:nience,a form letter we encourage you to send to the city officials of Mendota Heights, 750 So. Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120. Please do it today! Dear Mayor Huber: The Conservation Committee of Somerset Heights Elementary School (composed of students, parents, teachers, and principal) have been holding three recycling drives a year for over four years. We have put tons and tons of reusable paper, cans and glass into circulation again. We are presently faced with a dilemma. Metro -Recycling Center of St. Paul who have provided for us the service of transporting our bottles and cans to their recycling center, has found this has become a financially unsound practice (they also provide the service for Royal Redeemer Lutheran Church, Oakdale School, St. Peter's Church in Mendota etc.). Jim MacDonald of Metra -Recycling has suggested two alternatives, one would be to have the City of Mendota Heights purchase a used semi -trailer to be used to service the Mendota Heights drives. (He stated ?;,Test St. Paul and St. Louis Park were two cities that had done this). The second suggestion was for the City of Mendota Heights to provide a paved, land- scaped area that the city residents could bring their materials to. Metro -Recycling would then pick up the materials at regular intervals. Metro -Recycling hires many handicapped persons, which is another reason we would like to see them stay in operation. Please consider these proposals, after four years of developing an awareness to the s&gni- ficant worth of recycling, we feel it would be a tremendous step backward to abandon our practices. Thank you for your consideration. (Signature) "itiiV .r1 -' i FEBRUARY »y, 7 75 f 0 _.. r• ;re1Do 9,037 rear, :t :� �.s iv'+c,�c 247 � rat' r�.rre �t.o ? nog - :r£ii �1.0 %urQ arY. ^a�l�jn�e ;T 2 Amann 1,671.00 :ion t, kin, r1�Z.E1'sGUl9a iiiolOtt\ons 7 U Ai1`aun ^i "O JD"'Dti ..wrw i C:n -, n�iiur 0-13 § one 5 �i! i4.ZLt? P.. f1�. G 1.7II t:i ont-as....w Amount RSne P,,g r,t I -n(-1 `'�D? �- 5 Anon. Phone Calls 2 t " 2 -, M.0 Un 4,900.00 .-,.,....�...�,_...r.-•1............_,.^. Dog Bite 2 ......., tee........ .,._...... 2 Argun Rec;avered q A.SSaultr u1ElE]poo D L-�4ng while • Saye = 0 ..... i ni,o x--' cata,-:i 0 11 t?iCD�'ry D Jnr S--..:...100.00 Ajsault cz.i iii l Ci r�{ y, ..•,...,.",._.._.._..........v ..._ ...•...w...._. ..... �Ijit �`t+n 0, ct D = LO 2 ... _ .....,...,.�... q 792.00 Amount r _ •.,..o.. _>._ - - - r �� ...r„4 , �! C1 i t..... 1 Awe..wur•..w..a�-.r...u,.r•swwa�aw.r�.r......ww.w. _ ,. » : CJ ” ' ; C 3........, rnt;i ar!tC31 rimount' 30.00 ....._..............,Y j` ryD3 n5' r:aL'IIDnC; ,�..� ..ti..... 1 ''QS,D+ t a......� .. ....r..e . n... 19 .............. _ ,,-_ _. _.... C_0c; n, CS .v.«•:.. T+wnr..,-.w..s..•^'.... G •G'1C3?.`0d v ..Iv.:.rvma.^.aw,^�:•-:+•..n......:. Fiz:c�.e ?1',3 r^v...+..rW^.w:.L.w.ora.w. ...r.�.,..w rr ' 57q �1,' Unds r,LO s.......<>..w:r.•�. n.., u..�.+a Ai1`aun .n:rv_^.�r+un.ruexr.n...•rn ' •..� nn.w...^..e+cwaw-a. IIareC: ";.._.,_.... RoQDvor0d �'...�.,.,.... �i! i4.ZLt? P.. f1�. G 1.7II t:i ont-as....w TO ...�...,....._ r.... `'�D? �- 0 Anon. Phone Calls 2 t " 2 -, M.0 Un 4,900.00 .-,.,....�...�,_...r.-•1............_,.^. Dog Bite 2 ......., tee........ .,._...... 2 Argun 4,900.00 ?el_o � cre� • Saye = 0 ..... n S C1 en,: ea :r`_.._....r�r ,�Ocovcrcc 'v_.y...._.... "o u..nteMO•..1.�...J.+...i CCurt C!x-o'M t 1.. r..w.w•n..:..1l.KrJ Says t 3 _. N r1U z 0 TO Court tz-al"Fi, Boys 0 Cj.r1c 0 BOYS 4 Saye = 0 ..... 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: City Council FROM: Orvil J. Johnson City Administrator March 12, 1975 SUBJECT: Vote -A -Matic Election Equipment After the general election in November, 1974, we discussed briefly the proposition of a new voting and counting process. I gathered that there was concensus to proceed with investigation and research, and I have the following to report. Representatives of the five communities of Apple Valley, Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Mendota Heights and Rosemount have been meeting to discuss the feasibility of forming a consortium to buy the $26,000 counter. The attached agreement form has been submitted to the other four municipalities for their consideration and anticipated adoption. In order to support the joining of this consortium, I am proposing that we change the election process from paper ballots to punch -cards. This process is authorized by state law and as of this date there is only one approved company manufacturing equipment for punch -card voting. This company is known as Computer Election Systems and is headquartered in Berkeley, California. The cities of Apple Valley and Eagan used this voting process in the 1972 and 1974 elections and the staff officials are pleased with the results. There are 9 other Minnesota communities using CES equipment, including Bloomington, New Hope, Plymouth, Brooklyn Park, Hopkins, Minnetonka, Mound, Mankato and North Mankato plus Anoka and Olmstead counties. I have discussed our situation with Louise Kuderling of the League of Minnesota Municipalities. Mrs. Kuderling is recognized as an expert in the election process and laws. She highly recommends this process as an interim step between paper ballots and mechanical voting machines. Outfitting Mendota Heights for this election process would consist of purchasing a number of pieces of equipment. The following breakdown indicates the equipment and the estimated cost. Additional oral explanation will be given Tuesday evening. Election Equipment -2- March 12, 1975 1. Election Devices: Provide one device per 125 Registered Voters (30 voting devices) 2. Demonstrators 3. Transfer Cases 4. Crimper 3800 $230 x 125 4 @ $50 5 @ $20 5'. Counter $26,000 x 12.5% (% of population of 5 cities) Estimated Total Cost $ 6,900 200 100 185 3,250 $10,635 I am suggesting that this amount of money be appropriated in the 1976 budget (much of it from Federal Revenue Sharing). It is economically feasible and I believe highly desireable that we proceed in this direction. Assuming we approve the attached Joint Powers Agreement, we of course are committing ourselves to this process and therefore initiating a rather important step in the election process. I would recommend initiating such step. JOINT USE ACI:LI I•fErdT -- J:;r,F:C"I'ION I;9UIPMENT This Agreement dated the clay of _, 1975 by and between the City Councils of the Cities of Apple Valley, Eagan, Inver Grove ricights, Mendota Heights and Rosemount; t;IiEREAS, the Cities of Apple Valley, Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Mendota Ileights and Rosemount are mutually desirous of promoting better and faster election processing; and trZiEREAS, it appears that the counting and election processing can be accomplished more economically by joint municipal use; and and 1-.UERMS, a new voting method and counting process have been developed; WHEREAS, equipment known as Vote -A -Matic, has a number of inherent advantages for the election process; and [•,'HEREAS, such improved election processing involves the purchasing, housing and operation of a rather expensive component, namely an electronic/mechanical counter, costing approximately $26,000; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the respective City Councils of each of the above mentioned coTanunities hereby express their desire and commitment to a joint -use venture pursuant to the Joint Posers Act, M.S.A. 471.59; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that for and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. That a Vote -A -Matic counter be acquired jointly and that it be utilized and operated according to the agreed conditions. 2. That the City of Apple Valley will purchase the Vote -A-Matic counter in accordance with municipal purchasing procedures. The participating inunicij.)alitics will forward their payment to Apple Valley within fourtcc.n days of notification by Apple Valley that the counter has been received and in an amount equal to the respective percentage multiplied times the purchase price. (See paragraph #3 for appropriate percentage.) 3. The cost of said counter shall be borne by the five municipalities in relationship to their estimated population compared to the total estimated population, more specifically as per the following formulation: Apple Valley Fagan Inver Grove Heights Mendota heights Rosemount 14,039 24.4% 16,014 27.8% 3.5,619 27.2% 7,243 l 12.50 4,706 8.1% 4. The City of Apple Valley will act as custodian of the counter during periods of non-use, maintaining insurance and proper diligence for its safekeeping. 5. The Apple Valley Administrator will be responsible for locating the counter in a central location and in a manner timely for the necessary checking and processing prior to elections. Y_owever, the actual operation of the rlachine shall be performed by a person trained to operate the machine, said person to be selected annually by the city clerks of the communities participating in this agreement. 6. The election officials of the five communities are entitled to count their respective ballots on the machine after primary and general elections. -2- { 7. For the privilege of iising the machine, enjoying the convenience of its availability and associated housing and of other custodial costs, that the five communities will share in such annual costs with the City of Apple Valley, in a ratio similar to the purchasing formula, but based upon the then most recent population estimates issued by the Metropolitan Council. 8. Any community may terminate its participation in this joint agreement within the first seven years by giving a six-tlonth notice to the remaining members, acknowledging that any previously expended funds by that municipality for the acquisition of the equipment shall be returned to the terminating municipality less depreciation determined on a straight line basis over a term of ten years which sum shall be paid by the remaining municipalities in the same ratio as set forth in Paragraph 3. 9. This joint venture shall proceed in a manner so that the equipment is available and useable for the Primary and General Elections in 1976. 10. In the event that another municipality desires to utilize the Vote -A -Matic counter, it may do so only if all participating municipalities agree in writing and the cost of such use shall be determined at such time. 11. In the event that another municipality desires to purchase an interest in the Vote -A -Matic counter, it may do so only if all participating municipalities agree in writing and -3- such cost shall be rleteritiined upon the same population ratio as provided in Paragraph 3 above utilizing the respective populations of each municipality for such year less depreciation determined on a straight line basis over a term of ten years. The amount paid by such purchasing municipality shall be distributed to the then participating municipalities in the ratio of their original contribution. 12. This agreement shall become effective upon the acceptance by the City Council of each of the municipalities mentioned above and execution by their Mayors and Clerks. Apple Valley By: Its Mayor Attest: Eagan By: Its Mayor Attest: Inver Grove Heights By: - - Its 14ayor Attest: MIC Mendota Heights By: _ Its Mayor Attest: Rosemount By: Its Mayor Attest: r CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: City Council FROM: Orvil J. Johnson City Administrator March 12, 1975 SUBJECT: Tenth Holiday, Good Friday Amendment to Resolution No. 73-93, Personnel Code On December 17, 1974, you authorized the Good Friday holiday for office and non-union employees. In accordance with this authorization I would recommend the adoption of the attached proposed resolution to amend the Personnel Code resolution (Resolution No. 73-93, Section 14, Paragraph 1) to include the additional holiday. As you may recall, the Public Works 1974/75 contract was signed ' in July, 1974. As a part of the contract, we agreed to a tenth holiday (Good Friday) for the Public Works employees, effective in 1975. As a refresher note, negotiations with the Police remain in arbitration, hence existing conditions must prevail during such negotiating period. (I have been advised that it is an unfair labor practice to change any conditions during this negotiating period, hence this memo does not apply to the police group represented by Local 320.) I could find no legal authority for closing the City offices on Good Friday, therefore the offices will remain open with a partial staff. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NUMBER 73-93, SECTION 14, HOLIDAYS WHEREAS, the City Council on December 17, 1974, authorized an additional holiday, Good Friday, for employees not represented by a bargaining unit; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, that Paragraph 1 of Section 14 of Resolution Number 73-93, be amended to read as follows: "Section 14. Holidays. The following are to be paid holidays for those employees not included in labor contracts: New Year's Day, Presidents' Day (third Monday in February), Good Friday, Memorial Day (last Monday in May), Independence Day (July 4), Labor Day (first Monday in September), Columbus Day (second Monday in October), Veterans Day (November 11), Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. When New Year's Day, Independence Day, Veterans Day or Christmas Day falls on a Saturday, the preceeding day shall be observed as a holiday; when any of these days falls on a Sunday, the following day shall be observed as a holiday. The sections of labor contracts relating to holidays for those employees represented by bargaining units shall prevail for those employees." Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this day of , 1975. ATTEST: G.M. Radabaugh Clerk -Treasurer CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Donald L. Huber Mayor '+ ' " 1437 MARSHALL AVENUE 6 November 1974 BETTENBURG TO»VmSEND STOLTE & COMB, INC " s^/wr PAUL. w/wwEsOr^ss/o4 ~ TEL. 6+6'2558 AREA 000c 612 AeoH/TcoTs cwo/wscRs PLANNERS Mr. OrvYl J. Johnson, Administrator City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive St. Paul" Minnesota 55120 Subject: Mendota Heights Aerial Photography BTS&C Job No. 7401 Dear Orvil: As requested, | submit herewith some thoughts based on proposals received for aerial photography and for the preparation of contour maps for Mendota Haights, The October 17, 7974 proposal by Harry S. Johnson Co. includes the following: Two foot contour maps at a scale of l inch = 100 feet, They propose quarter section maps which will be ][Y/ x ]Cy/ in size. Maps will be mylar reproducYbles. They propose to furnish one set of contact prints. To do the above will cost as follows: Basic aerial photography ------------------- $ 9,230,00 Nap compilation /min 160 aonas\ at $3.00 per acre. Assume entire community to be done at one time, 640 acres @ $3'0O -------------------------- $lg,2OO'OO Estimated cost of entire City if done at one time --------------------------------------- $28,43O'OD Barbara Lukermanns/ report of May 16, 1974 recommended that maps be made on a l// = 200 foot scale and be submitted on one-half section size reprod'c/bles (possibly 2/// x 36"). She suggests two sats of oronof|ex reproduciblas, eliminating contact prints to save cost. One set to be marked up by the Owner to show vital information such as street names, drainage flow, subdivision names, water elevations, atc. The other sot to be used for engineering studies, plot development review, etc. 15 page two Mr. Orvil J. Johnson Mendota Heights Aerial Photography In her report, Barbara indicates comparative costs from Mark Hurd, Chicago Aerial and Harry Johnson showing a breakdown based on doing a limited amount of work over a two year period. Based on flight costs, reproducible costs and the preparation of contour maps, the totals for this limited work are quite comparable. However, if you go to a project covering the entire ten square miles of City property, either all at one time or over a period of time (2 to 5 or more years) there is a sizable difference in total cost because of Harry Johnson's lower per acre charge for preparing contour maps. The following table illustrates this point. Estimated cost to cover entire City based on May 16, 1974 prices Item Mark Chicago Harry Hurd Aerial Johnson Flight Costs $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 650.00 1/2 Section Reproducibles Min. 24 needed 720.00 600.00 720.00 Contour Maps Ground Control 0 0 5,700.00 6400 Acres Mapping 57,600.00 57,600.00 213120.00 Grand Total to Complete Entire City $59,440.00 $59,800.00 $28,910.00 Harry Johnson's total shown above compares favorably with his October 17th proposal. It does appear, from the above tabulation that Harry Johnson's figures are most favorable to the City for:a City-wide mapping program. With the amount of money involved, it appears that competitive bids will be required and that it will be necessary to establish a uniform set of specifications based on what is needed or wanted. It has been suggested to us that it may be possible to negotiate a lower "per acre" charge with Mark Hurd, especially if the ground control work is furnished to them. It appears that no matter who does the work, ground control will cost at least $5,000.00 to $6,000.00. Harry Johnson suggests furnishing mylar reproducibles. Mark Hurd furnishes cronoflex reproducibles. In our opinion, cronoflex materials are far superior to mylar. IN page three Mr. Orvil J. Johnson Mendota Heights Aerial Photography With regard to the size and scale of the reproducibles, a 200 foot per inch scale drawing is excellent for engineering studies and planning but, the 100 inch per foot quarter section maps show better detail and can be used by land developers who will pay handsomly for copies of topographic information of specific areas. In this manner, some of the capitol investment may be recovered by the City. think that it is necessary to evaluate just how such a project can be financed, whether it should be accomplished in stages, and if so, on what basis. If you deem it advisable, I will be happy to meet with you to go over the above comments in detail. Very truly yours, Lzk Edward F. Kishel EFK/d M2% p1 q) Vr tj VILLAGE OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NON - AG TAX LEVIES YEAR PAYABLE TOTAL MILL LEVY STATE COUNTY VILLAGE SCHOOLS METRO & MISC. MILLS % MILLS % MILLS % MILLS % MILLS % 1960 226.60 8.10 3.57 40.04 17.62 22.19 9.79 156.27 '69.02 61 233.39 6.84 2.92 41.57 17.83 18.32 7.84 166.66 71.41 62 241.78 6.39 2.64 44.03 18.20 19.77 8.17 171.59 70.99 1963 241.81 8.31 3.44 44.39 18.33 20.77 8.58 168.34 69.65 64 243.59 8.22 3.37 42.35 17.41 20.96 8.62 171.96 70.60 65 233.23 6.84 2-.93 44.58 19.12 20.98 9.01 160.83 68.94 1966 249.10 18.32 7.35 45.54 18.30 24.38 9.78 160.86 64.57 67 238.19 17.14 7.19 50.71 21.32 24.58 10.35 145.76 61.14 68 244.65 ----- ---- 57.25 23.42 26.12 10.66 161.28 65.92 1969 258.10 ----- ---- 55.68 21.61 35.70 13.84 166.72 64.55 70 297.04 ----- ---- 55.31 18.60 39.74 13.38 201.99 68.02 71 318.56 ----- ---- 52.77 16.52 43.79 13.79 I 220.79 69.31 1.21 .38 1972 291.28 ----- ---- 58.67 20.15 40.60 13.94 187.17 64.25 4.84 1.66 97.09 1972 co nverted 19.56 20.15 13.53 13.94 62.39 64.25 1.61 1.66 1973 95.42 New Ba sis 19.67 20.58 12.64 13.27 61.44 64.40 1.67 1.75 1974 93.19 19.25 20.64 12.47 13.37 59.00 63.34 2.47 2.65 1975 96.75 19.42 20.07 12.36 12.78 60.60 62.64 4.37 4.51 Independent School District ALOUT DISTRICT BULLETIN Page 3 B 0--A-RD BRIEFS An unofficial report of Board of Education proceedings Decisions on accepting the City of Mendota Heights plan for the extension of Warrior Drive and the County Engineers plan for construction of a walkway -bikeway along Delaware Avenue were postponed pending more information and review by the School Board at its regular meeting last Tuesday, March 11. WARRIOR DRIVE AND DELAWARE AVENUE PROJECTS After almost a year and a half of meetings and a public hearing on the matter, the School Board tabled until its next meeting on Tuesday, March 25 the question of entering into a joint powers agreement with West St. Paul and Mendota Heights for construction of a walkway -bikeway along Delaware Avenue from Highway 110 to Emerson Avenue. Costs of the estimated $30,000 project would be shared equally by the three governmental units involved, but the design of the actual walkway is still a matter - of controversy. Board chairman Robert Bonine suggested that possible options under consideration be made available to residents who live on Delaware. A resident attend- ing the Board meeting protested the eight -foot walkway crossing her property, and asked for more study of the possibility of putting four -foot walkways on either side of the road. In a related matter, the Board heard from citizens living near Henry Sibley High School who opposed the City of Mendota Height's plan for the extension of Warrior Drive to Marie Avenue. They cited safety hazards among their concerns. Board member Mrs. Phyllis Stueve outlined an optional plan for providing another road to serve the high school, and the Board agreed to review the matter further with both the City engineer and the School District engineer. In planning for the road extension it had been hoped to relieve some of the traffic pressure on Delaware Avenue. 1975-76 SCHOOL CALENDAR ADOPTED The Board approved the calendar for the coming school year developed as a result of the Educational Policies Committee meet and confer process. The calendar provides for 176 student days, four pre-school workshop days (five for new staff), four end -of - quarter days, one end -of -year day, and five paid holidays for a total of 190 days for .returning teachers. The teacher workshop starts Monday, August 25, for returning teachers; Friday, June 4, is the last day of the school term. DISTRICT TESTING PROGRAM REPORT Thomas R. Kleppe, assistant superintendent for instruction and curriculum, outlined the District's testing program and results. His report listed the types of tests given at the elementary, junior high and senior high levels, and also included material on the values and limitations of tests. Kleppe explained that the tests can be used to measure skills and achievement of District 197 students against state or CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: City Council FROM: Orvil J. Johnson City Administrator March 18, 1975 SUBJECT: Employment of Public Works Maintenance Man 0 As you may be aware, for the past several months the Public Works staff has consisted of seven men rather than the eight positions budgeted in the 1975 budget. In an attempt to complete the Public Works staff, we have solicited and received several applications for Maintenance Man. As a result of the interviewing process, John S. Neska, 158 E. Wentworth, has been employed as a probationary employee. John has worked for the Public Works Department as a seasonal employee in the past, and Bruce indicates that his performance during such employment was very satisfactory. I would therefore recommend that John Laska be approved as a probationary employee and that his salary be established at $897.50 per month. r S HA j FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING 1975 Revenues U.S. Fiscal Assistance $ 7,066.00 Anticipated Receipts (3 quarters) 21,198.00 Interest Income 327.42 $28,591.00 Expenditures Bettenburg 2,189.04 Midwest Planning 1,000.00 Soil Exploration 1,707.80 $ 4,897.00 1975 Budgeted Items Pagers 9,300.00 Transfers 10,000.00 Midwest Planning - Balance on Study 1,490.00 $20,790.00 Total Expenditures $25,687.00 Excess of Revenues over Expenditures 2,904.00 Fund Balance 12/31/74 291685.00 Estimated Fund Balance Op e-, .�X %S $32,589.00 O.J.J. 3/18/75 CITY OF MEND" ',1 HEIGHTS General P•und Statement of Cash Receiots Monthly Year to Revenues Date General Property Taxes Dakota County Road & Bridge Levy State Aids RISA Maintenance Licenses, Permits & Other Revenues Malt Beverage & Liquor Dog Contractors Cigarette Bicycle Rubbish Building Slater & Plumbing Well Gas Heating Fireworks & Incinerator Dog Impounding Sewer Permits Seg-,er Rentals Rezoning i ., $ 3,326.38 787.50 11.00 75.00 31.00 671.00 49.50 9,113.47 25.00. $ 5,335.41 787.50 25.00 200.00 48.00 115.00 729.00 394.00 97.50 18,865.18, 375.00 Plt AUT Date February 1975 Estimated Anticipated Revenues Revenues $325,000.00 41,000.00 138,080.00 1,600.00 700.00 1,000.00 3,500.00 130.00 100.00 300.00 9,000.00 2,000.00 50.00 600.00 30.00 600.00 1,000.00 84,000.00 1,000.00 $320,584.59 41,000.00 137,292.50 1,600.00 700.00 975.00 3,300.00 82.00 100.00 185.00 8,271.00 2,000.00 50.00 206.00 30.00 502.50 1,000.00 65,134.82 625.00 Fili ng Street Charges Sale of Accident Reports, Mans, and Ordinances Court Fines Fire Calls & Contracts Interest Income CITY OF MENDr HEIGHTS Cash Reccin-�. Con't. Monthly Revenues 10.00 290.50 1,500.00 Year to Date 55.00 800.50 3,200.00 Date ary 1 Estimated Anticipated Revenues Revenues 15,330.00 15,330.00 $ 10.00 $ 10.00 350.00 350.00 200.00 145.00 6,000.00 5',199.50 61000.00 2,800.00 2,300.00 2,300.00 Sundry 26.22 2,673.46 2,200.00 473.46 Project Reimbursement 15,330.00 15,330.00 Recreation Programs 2,000.00 2,000.00 Interceotor Maintenance 3,800.00 3,800.00 Surcharge - State of Minnesota 14.00 11600.00 1,586.00 SSC - �•ietropolitan Sewer Board 18400.00 18,000.00 Trunk Sewer & Debt Service Transfer 36,000.00 36,000.00 Federal Revenue Sharing Transfer 10,000.00 10,000.00 Soecial Police Fund Transfer 3,000.00 3,000.00 Total General Fund Revenues $ 15,916.57 $ 33,714.55 $717,400.00 684,632.37 Total Revenues over Estimated Revenues 473.46 473.46 33,241.09 684,158.91 Exnenditures Administration Personal Services Salaries CITY OF MENL L HEIGHTS Year 1975 Admini'stration Expenditures Date February 1975 Monthly Year to 1975 Unexpended Expenditures Date Budget Balance M ;avor & Councilmen 525.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 6,300.00 $ 5,250.00 Full Time 8,278.82 16,032.72 87,3350-00 71,317.28 Temnorary 750-00 750.00 9,803.82* 17,082.72 $ 94,400.00 77,317.28 Contractual Services City i-),ttorney Fees 5,000-00 5,000.00 Retainer 1,000.00 11000-00 4,000.00 3,000.00 Prosecutions 1,794.35 1,794.35 7,000.00 5,205.65 City Engineer Retainer 600.00 2,400.00 1,800.00 City 171�ccountant 125.00 125.00 6,500-00 6,375.00 3,uildinainsnector Fees I - 4,500-00 4,500.00 Retainer 150.00 300.00 2,000.00 1,700.00 Gas inspector 275.00 275.00 600.00 325.00 Weed insnector 350-00 350.00 Dog Catcher 137.75 353.75 2,000.00 1,646.25 Telephone 150.92 320.17 1,600.00 1,279.83 Publications, Books 136.00 176.29 11000.00 823.78 Eauinment Leases 133.31 364.21 1,500.00 1,135.79 Office Rental 830.00 1,760.00 10,560.00 8.,800.00 Hospitalization 824.39 1,628.69 10,130.00 8,501.31 in'surance 92.00 92.00 16,300.00 16,208.00 CITY OF MENC HEIGHTS Administration Expenditures Can't. Date— February 1975 Contractual Services, Cont. Custodial Commodities Office Supplies Repairs & Maintenance Postage Other Charges Conferences, Schools & Conventions Does & Subscriptions Mileage Election Expense Surcharges - State SAC - Metropolitan City Share of PERRA City Share of FICA Sundry Dog Pound Fees Capital Outlay Equipment Contingency of Minnesota Sewer Board Monthly Year to 1975 Unexpended Expenditures Date Budget Balance . $ $ 25.00 $ 450-00 $ 425.00 5,703.72 8,814.39 75,890.00 67,075.61 137.97 237.95 3,000.00 2,762.05 500.00 500.00 187.00 225.00 500-00 274.10 324.97 463.85 4,000�00 3,536.15 200.00 297.40 800.00 502.60 126.50 2,400.00 2,273.50 176.92 362.96 2,200.00 1,837.04 6.00 100.00 94.00 176.27 1,600-00 1,423.73 297-00 18,000.00 17,703.00 2,207.00 4,296.77 26,620-00 22,323.23 1.806.28 7,100-00 5,293.72 25.00 129.45 2,000.00 1,870.55 46.00 100.00 500.00 400.00 2,654.92 7,598-63 61,320.00 53,721.37 1,000.00 1,000.00 4,950 .00 4,950.00 5,950.00 5,950.00 Total Administration Expenditures $ 17,482043 $ 33,050.50 $241,560-00 $207r600.41 CITY OF MENE . HEIGHTS Police Department rxnenditures Date February. 1975 Monthly Year to 1975 Unexpended Expenditures Date Budget Balance Expenditures _ Personal Services Salaries Salaries $ 9,170.00 $ 18,340.00 $126,170.00 $107,830.00 Overtime 490.35 614.76 1,000.00 385.24 Office Clerk 329.68 535.36 ( 535.36) 9,990.03 19,490.12 127,170.00 107,679.8 Contractural Services Telephone 118.76 205.26 1,000.00 794.74 Conferences, Schools, & Dues 38.40 134.40 500.00 365.60 .•, 'est St. Paul Dispatching 7,697.30 7,697.30 8,110.00 412.70 Insurance 416.00 416.00 530.00 114.00 8,270.46 8,452.96 10,140.00 1,687.04 Comlmoditi es Supplies 35.45 65.50 1,200.00 1,134.50 Gasoline & Oil 67.7.75 1,290.74 7,000.00 5,709.26 :auto Repairs & Maintenance 423.39 726.90 6,500.00 5,773.10 Radio Repairs & Maintenance Other-Renairs & Maintenance Other Charges Car ' ashi ngs Clothing'Allowance S tm dry Canital Outlay Squad Cars Other Eauipment Total Police Dent. Expenditures 18.00 18.00 250.00 232.00 48.38 211.54 200.00 ( 11.54) 1,153.47 _,3 15,150.00 1.80 1.80 300.00 298.20 44.10 1,670.00 1,625.90 1.75 300.0_0 298.25 1.80 • 5 2,270.00- 2,222.35 6,400.00 6,400.00 86.15 86.15 2,130.00 2,043.85 86.15 86.15 8,530.00 $ 19,501.91 $ 30,389.56 $163,260.00 $132,870.44 11 -nendi tures Personal Services Salaries Chief & Assistant Volunteer Firemen Contractual Services Telenhone IIeat� & lectricity Conferences, Schools, & Dues Nest St. Paul Dispatching Insurance Commodities Sunnlies Gasoline & Oil Fire Eauin. Repairs & Maintenance Other I;aui nment Renairs & Maint. Radio ,^.,quip. Repairs & Mai nt. Other Charges Sno.., Plowing Firemen's Driveways S undry i3ui lding 24ai ntenance CITY OF MENL, .%. IIEIGHTS Fire Department Exnenditures Date February 1975 Monthly Year to 1975 Unexpended Expenditures Date Budget Balance $ 220.00 $ 440.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 2,560.00 6.00 11,000.00 10,994.00 220.00 446.00 14,000.00 13,554.00 162.95 340.25 200.00 ( 140.25) 265.18 265.18 1,400.00 1,134.82 10.00 60.00 2,000.00 1,940.00 948.44 948.44 1,000.00 51.56 128.80 257.60 1,750.00 1,492.40 1,515.37 1,871.47 6,350.00 32.20 1,300.00 1,267.80 350.00 350.00 306.26 1,945.65 53.07 2,000.00 45.46 ( 140.18) 306.26 2,172.38 3,650.00 900.00 900.00 94.00 103.96 400.00 296.04 47.25 47.25 500.00 452.75 141.25 Capital Outlay 151.21 1,800.00 Fire Fighting Equipment 252.18 252.18 4,000.00 3,747.82 252.18 252.18 4,000.00 3,747.8 Total Fire Department Expenditures$ 2,435.06 4,893.24 $ 29,800.00 24,906.76 CITY OF MEND . IIEIGHTS Road & Bridge Department Expenditures Date February 1975 Expenditures Personal Services Salaries Salaries Overtime Seasonal Contractual Services Telephone ?eat & Electricity Commodities Supplies Gasoline & Oil Equipment Repairs & Maintenance Other Charges Street Signs & Posts Street Sand & Salt Street Oiling & Seal Coat Street Cleaning Road Fill Asphalt Equipment Rental 3uilding Maintenance Building Rental Rubbish Removal Sundry Canital Outlay New 2qu nment Total Road & Bridge Dept. Expend. Monthly Year to 1975 Unexpended Expenditures Date Budget Balance $ 2,853.00 $ 6,003.00 $ 41,250.00 $ 35,247.00 96.00 1,278.00 2,000.00 722.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2.,949.00 7,281.00 45,750.00 38,4693-50--- G 012.74 12.74 2.5.18 150.00 124.82 191.88 231.36 600.00 368.64 204.62 256.54 750.00 493.46 279.93 349.80 2,400.00. 2,050.20 552.21 869.70 2,300.00 1,430.30 61.05 108.80 2,400.00 2,291.20 893.19 1,328.30 7,100.00 5,771.70 234.47 234.47 1,000.00 765.53 2,000.00 2,000.00 17,000.00 17,000.00 1,700.00 1,700.00 27.11 4,000.00 3,972.89 1,800.00 1,800.00 500.00 500.00 200.00 400.00 1,500.00 1,100.00 20.00 200.00 180.00 43.80 53.33 800.00 746.67 478.27 734.91 30,500.00 29,765.fTT-- 800.00 800.00 800.00 800.00 $ 4,525.08 $ 9,600.75 $ 8.,900.00 $ 75,299.25 CITY OF MEIND, TIBIGHTS Public Utilities Department Expenditures Date February 1975 Monthly Year to 1975 Unexpended Exoenditures Expenditures Date Budget Balance --ersonal Services Salaries Salaries $ 1,197.00 $ 2,098.00 $ 12,300.00 $ 10,202.00 Overtime & Weekend Duty 53.00 333.00 2,200.00 1,867.00 Seasonal 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,250.00 2,431.00 15,500.00 13,069.00 Contractual Services Teleohone 35.25 73.05 450.00 376.95 "ca-& Electricity 33.32 33.32 600.00 566.68 Lift Station Electricity 181.52 .316.23 1,200.00 883.77 Street Lighting 699.99 825.29 2,600.00 1,774.71 950.08 1,247.89 4,850.00 3,602.11 Commodities SuD-31 i es 266.64 266.64 11500.00 1,233.36 Gasoline & Oil 41.25 41.25 650.00 608.75 Equipment Repairs & Maintenance 159.07 223.06 11000.00 776.94 head House Maintenance 15.00 300.00 285.00 LiFt Station :Maintenance 11000.00 1,000.00 466.96 545.95 4,450.00 3,904.05 Other Charaes lfvdraint Rental 5,600.00 5,600.00 !Tvdran-,-- Reoairs 805.00 805.00 500.00 305.00) Hydrant Water Readings 124.49 180.00 55.51 rlauinment- Rentals 700-00 700.00 F"I"bblish Removal 8.00 8.00 200.00 192.00 Sewer Rental Exnense 14,228.26 85,000.00 70,771.74 Sundry 500-00 Tra-flic Signal Operations & Maint. 55.85 131.98 750.00 618.02 868.35 15,297.73 93,430.00 78,132.27 Capital Outlay :116,a E'rruin.ment- 5,461.00 500.00 ( 4,961.00) 5,461.00 500.00 ( 4,M.UUT- Total Public Utilities Dept. -xnend4tures $ 3,535.39 $ 24,9T3-.57 $1-13,730.00 $ 93,74� .1- - .43 Exoendi tures Personal Services Salaries Salaries Overtime Temnorary :Aaintenance� :recreation Contractual Services Professional Consultant Tcle Mone Heat& Electricity Commodities Supplies, Recreation Supplies, Park Gasoline & Oil CITY OF MEND . , 1113IGHTS Parks & Recreation Department Expenditures Late Pehruary 1975 :Monthly Year 1975 Unexpended Expenditures Date Budget Balance Equipment Repairs & Maintenance Other Charges Equioment Rentals & Leases _?u..)bi si_ Removal Sundry Recreation Programs Hydrant Tlater Readings S. c' o o 1 s $ 1,721.00 $ 3,766.00 $ 29,670.00 $ 25,904.00 17.00 310.00 800.00 490.00 2,500.00 10,330.00 1,738.00 4,076.00 43,800.00 39,724.00 200.00 200.00 52.55 103.01 500.00 396.99 352.49 392.99 2,200.00 1,807.01 405.04 496.00 2,900.00 2,404.00 121.77 355.82 600.00 244.18 3,000.00 3,000.00 21.70 21.70 600.00 578.30 118.95 122.25 2,000.00 11,B77__7_5L_ 262.42 499.77 6,200.00 5,700.23 157.00 248.00 2,000.00 1,752.00 400.00 400.00 1.60 1.60 800.00 798.40 2,000.00 2,000.00 44.39 44.39 650.00 605.61 100.00 100.00 202.99 293.99 5,950.00 5,656.01 CITY OF MENDt--t HEIGHTS Parks & Recreation Dept. Expenditures Con!,.t. Date February 1975 Monthly Year 1975 Unexpended Expenditures Expenditures Date Budget Balance Shade Tree Program Consultant $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 Equipment Rental 41000.00 4,000.00 Tree Reolacement 11000.00 11000.00 6,000.00 6,00U.00 Capital Outlay New Eauiament 500-00 $ 500.00 500-00 500.00 Total Parks & Recreation DeDt. Expenditures $— 2,608.45 $ 5,365.76 $ G5,350.00 $ 59,984.24 Exoenditures Contractual Services Citv Planner Retainer Professional Services Other Costs Other Costs Total Planning Commission Expenditures CITY OF MEND HEIGIITS Planning Commission,Expenditures Date February 1975 Monthly Year to 1975 Unexpended Expenditures Date Budget Balance $ 300.00 $ 1,026.21 $ 3,600.00 $ 2,573.79 1,894.28 2,334.88 10,000.00 7,665.12 2,194.28 3,361.09 13,600.00 10,238.91 20_0.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 $ 2,194.28 $ 3,361.09 $ 13,300.00 $ 10,438.91 Exoenditures General Fund Administration Police Fi re Public Works Streets Utilities Parks Planning Total General Fund Expenditures CITY OF MEND A IIEICHTS General Fund Year 1975 Date February 1975 Total Exnenditures Monthly Year to 1975 Unexpended Exnenditures Date Budget Balance $ 17,487.43 19,501.91 2,435.06 $ 33,959.59 30,389.56 4,893.24 $241,560.00 1G3,260.00 29,800.00 $207,600.41 132,870.44 24,906.76 4,525.08 9,600.75 84,900.00 75,299.25 3,535.89 24,983.57 118,730.00 93,746.43 2,608.45 5,365.76 65,350.00 59,984.24 2,194.28 3,361.09 13,800.00 10,438.91 $ 52,288.10 $112,553.56 $717,400.00 $604,846�- t Revenues Interest Income on Investments $ Expenditures Discount on Bond Issue Consultant Legal Fees Bond Issue Construction Costs Landscaping Purchase of Equipment Park Site Surveys Acquisition of Property Land Appraisal Engineering Costs Bond Issue Revenues C CITY OF MENDU-.-i I3EIGIITS 1972 Park Bond Issue Year 1975 Date February 1975 1972 Monthly Year to 1973 & 1974 Total Revenue Revenue Date Revenues Collected $ 47,440.91 $ 47,440.91 $ 47,440.91 $ 47,440.91 Monthly Year to 1971-2-3-4 Total Expenditures Date Expenditures Expenditures 637.50 637.50 715.00 $ 5,000.00 33,816.42 5,061.15 3,921.25 212,596.29 15,212.45 1,514.13 23,444.82 6.040.00 81,572.53 3,332.00 1,799.74 $ 5,000.00 33,816.42 5,698.65 3,921.25 212,596.29 15,212.45 1,514.13 23,444.82 6,755.00 81,572.53 3,332.00 1,799.74 $ 637.50 $ 1,352.50 393,310.78 $394,663.28 480,000.00 47,440.91 Expenditures 394,663.28 132,777,77 CITY OF IAIENDO7.,, HEIGHTS 1972 Park Bond Issue Debt Service Fund Year 1975 Date February 1975' Monthly Year to 1972-3-4 Total Revenue Revenues Revenue Date Revenues Collected Tax Levies Collected by Dak. Co. $ 1,010.04 $ 1,177.54 $ 71,607.58 $ 72,785.12 Exnenditures Principal Payment on Bond Issue Interest Expense Sundry (Bond Fees) Monthly Year to 1971-2-3-4 Total Expenditures Date Expenditures Expenditures $ $ $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 56,323.75 56,823.75 129.14 129.14 $ $ $66,952.89 $ 661