Loading...
1973-04-10SIF i i VILLAG•'E OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA April 10, 1973 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Special Discussion: Rogers Lake Level Control 4. New Business. 5. Adjourn. (kx, VILLAGE OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS (' MEMO s`. April 6, 1973 ,. TO: Village Council FROM: Orvil J. Johnson Village Administrator ' SUBJECT: Rogers Lake Discussion I am enclosing a letter from Ed Kishel concerning the -several changes suggested as modifications of the original feasibility report. Please note the estimated increase in construction costs in addition to the {' additional outlet ditch work of some $38,000. The following questions are just some of the policy matters that should be determined, or at least well understoodprior to the official hearing on -April 17. These questions ar,e as follow: 1. Determine elevation of outlet: a. Application is for 873.0, but will r. require acquisition of flowage !' rights. 4 b. DNR in effect, says 872.2 is high k� water level, and natural high water elevation. ` Question: Do we stick with application at 873.0 o'r re—apply for elevation of 872.2? _ 2. Re—evaluate assessment determination, in light of: Ra. Increased estimated cost, $143,000 to $155,300.' b. Addition of outlet improvements in Friendly Marsh in amount of $38,000. ' Rogers Lake —2— April 6, 1973 c. Undetermined highway construction. MHD indicates inability to participate due to Federal refusal to release monies on I -35E. Questions: a. Should Village absorb the• previously determined MHD share of cost either temporarily .' or permanently? r b. Should the original estimated assessment rate of about 1.250 .,. per square foot be proposed, or should that'be increased to y; 1.350 as noted in Ed's letter? a• 'L , a. 30 March 1973 BETTENBURG TOWNSEND STOLTE & COMB, INC • SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55104 • TEL. 646-2558 AREA CODE 612 A R C H'I T E C T S E N G 1 N E E R 5 P L A N N E R S Mr. Orvil J. Johnson, Administrator Village of Mendota Heights, Minnesota 750 South Plaza Drive Saint Paul, Minnesota 55120 Subject: Mendota Heights Rogers Lake Overflow Imp. 72, Proj. 4 BTS&C Project No. 7118 Dear Orvil: As the result of Council action, at the meeting of March 20, 1973, in establishing a new public hearing date of April 17, 1973 for the above project, certain changes in the scope and cost of the project are now apparent. I report on these matters herewith. Initial studies for the project were started in the summer and early fall of 1971. Cost figures submitted were based on unit prices as of that time. Because the feasibility report included several suggested routes for overflow, precise quan- tities of work were difficult to establish. We finally arrived at an estimated cost of $143,000.00, for the recommended route. We are now in a position to be more exact in our estimates of quantity and cost and arrive at an estimated price of $155,315.00, as the cost of constructing the overflow facilities. This esti- mated cost indludes fees and contingencies.' In addition to overflow facilities, on March 6, 1973, we submitted a feasibility study for proposed ditch cleaning and stilling pond construction in the Interstate Valley as part of the outlet for the overflow facilities. This is a needed improve- ment but, not necessarily one which should be financed by the overflow project. It is estimated that to clean the ditch and to construct the ponds will cost approx- imately $38,000.00, including fees and contingencies. Even though these costs should come out of Village funds, it is advisable to include the work with the over- flow project in order to complete financing arrangements. Therefore, it has been suggested that in preparing for the public hearing, consider- ation should be given to combining the above discussed work into one project in order to provide a complete function for the Roger's Lake overflow. 1437 MARSHALL AVENUE a• 'L , a. 30 March 1973 BETTENBURG TOWNSEND STOLTE & COMB, INC • SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55104 • TEL. 646-2558 AREA CODE 612 A R C H'I T E C T S E N G 1 N E E R 5 P L A N N E R S Mr. Orvil J. Johnson, Administrator Village of Mendota Heights, Minnesota 750 South Plaza Drive Saint Paul, Minnesota 55120 Subject: Mendota Heights Rogers Lake Overflow Imp. 72, Proj. 4 BTS&C Project No. 7118 Dear Orvil: As the result of Council action, at the meeting of March 20, 1973, in establishing a new public hearing date of April 17, 1973 for the above project, certain changes in the scope and cost of the project are now apparent. I report on these matters herewith. Initial studies for the project were started in the summer and early fall of 1971. Cost figures submitted were based on unit prices as of that time. Because the feasibility report included several suggested routes for overflow, precise quan- tities of work were difficult to establish. We finally arrived at an estimated cost of $143,000.00, for the recommended route. We are now in a position to be more exact in our estimates of quantity and cost and arrive at an estimated price of $155,315.00, as the cost of constructing the overflow facilities. This esti- mated cost indludes fees and contingencies.' In addition to overflow facilities, on March 6, 1973, we submitted a feasibility study for proposed ditch cleaning and stilling pond construction in the Interstate Valley as part of the outlet for the overflow facilities. This is a needed improve- ment but, not necessarily one which should be financed by the overflow project. It is estimated that to clean the ditch and to construct the ponds will cost approx- imately $38,000.00, including fees and contingencies. Even though these costs should come out of Village funds, it is advisable to include the work with the over- flow project in order to complete financing arrangements. Therefore, it has been suggested that in preparing for the public hearing, consider- ation should be given to combining the above discussed work into one project in order to provide a complete function for the Roger's Lake overflow. Mr. Orvjl J. Johnson 2 30 March 1973 For the.purpose of determining' assessment charges, we are assuming that there will be no change in the area to be assessed. With the same assessable area and a new estimated project cost, the estimated unit assessable cost for the overflow portion of the project is $0.0135, per square foot. This is slightly higher than the unit price of $0.01242, per square foot discussed at the first hearing. Because there have been changes, and because there are still some unknowns to be resolved, it is suggested and recommended that there be a Council study session conducted prior to the hearing date so that all Village authorities are aware of as many details as possible with respect to the hearing. We should also deter- mine as soon as possible just what exhibits or data will be needed for the hearing. If you have any questions or suggestions, please call me. VerC()truly yours, Edward F. 0 el E FK: g b