1985-09-03�
0
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 3, 1985 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order. � 7: a �
2. Ro 11 Ca 11. � CtiC� -�a�1�,,�'-
3. Agenda Adoption.
—' �
4. Approval of Minutes, August 6. —f�
5. Consent Calendar .— �
a. Acknowledgement of the August 28 Planning Commission Minutes.
b. Acknowledgement of inemo on Selection of Public Works Superintendent.
�c. Acknowledgement of Code Enforcement Monthly Report for August.
d. Approval of the List of Claims.
�e. A�ppro al of the List of Licenses.
�'. 4 7Y�ly� , �
End of Consent Cale dar
6. Public Comrnents and Requests
a. Citizen's Request Concerning Level of Roger's Lake. '��'�
- 7. Response to Public Requests
=�°� a. Stop Sign Request Clement and First Avenue) - Attached Ordinance
8. Bi d Awards� Publ i c Heari n s'��` %�� �'.,t„�, Amendi ng Ord ` No. 1113
��.`�` �"_''��`-�--
a. Bid w rd for Mendota Heig ts ad Con truction
y� �s-- - ��.,,� � �, . ��,, �,�� — �/ � a, ���. � f-
b. Public Hearing on proposed 1986 Budget and use of General Revenue
S�r,ing�� _
�/�� � �- �v �
9. Unfinished and�New Business �� � /�
a. Plannin Commission Case No. 85-21, Eileen F. 0'Rourke, Request for
Subdivision Repeal, Recommend Approval) - Attached Resolution. —��
�
b. Plannin Commission Case No. 85-17, George T. Spanjers, Re uest for
Pr 1 i mi nary P1 at, R o m d pproval ). — y� ,7'',,,,�,/— � �,/Gy/,
ti�/ ` ,.�,1 ' �/�G/`� 4
Y �
c. Plannin Commission Case No. 85-25, Stephen G. Hunt r, Request for y ,
ari ance, ecorr �en pprova l� ,/� �_�
� �
� 31�� . �'' .�„y �-� 3 ,r�o� �
d. Pla in Commission Case No. 85-26, Ray A. McLevish, Request for .��-
Variance, Recommend Approval . ,�
September 2, 1985 Agenda
Page Two
e. Lake LeMay Flooding. - �,i. � �
f. Curl ey Addi ti on Bi ke Trai 1. ����1 a,� � i��
. /�'�
g. Zaspel Easement — /9 ,y��
h. Barton-Aschman Contrac .- /� � �
�-``,�"
i. NSP Propo�ed le tric te Increase.�:�^ ������ s���
/ `* '`�✓
j. Fair Labor S andards Act ( LSA). —�
10. �Council Comments and Requests
�
11. Closed Session to Consider Purchase Offers for Wachtler Park and
Fischer redevelopment proper„ties. �
,: L ��
12 . Ad j ou rn . ���^ �r, ��
`� T: s�s
��`
� ��
e�:-� ��� � —
7:4c� �. �:3s "'
��P. — .�
.�-,�.�--�.y�,. � .
�. � _ ��-� �� � �� ,P��- � �
� ���
.. �
�
�-.�.�� � .
�
. �
�. � � ' ,
. ..
0
. . �
�� ���
���� �����
C��
� �� � 1��� .
AUG 2 2 �9�5
C�J r!���CL�: ZSJ ,�1 ��
�
�.;�G�2.. ��21�n,
,
. G{� ..���u ��c� ��, � .��� �. �.�.� �,�'-�--
. . . .. .. . �
. . . .. :: ,. � :: .-:r� �i�., �'�+� � ,�`2c;c,�,� 1��Pi
. . . . . . . . Y-s� _
-•s-.:<:• :>�:�> :,� . ... .. .. . . . . . =�ir>�.
. . � . . .. . - . . r� - .-. ,
i �i �' ' � � / / � � ,� � �
. � 11� �/ �l'�� / � r
i ; + � i / / t � �r' f !,, ` � �,� � f ,
1
% 1 � � a "' / 1 "`/ 1
! �' ` j� � • .► J �
! �/
�� .� /j �l r � j �j �� ��
fI " /f r � j / i' � ;
I
j� 11 ,r � � / ts��
.
/ . � / ! r ! �/ / �i�
/ ,, � � r� j �� �, �► t /�� � ` � �
\ , / , l �� - �i - i
1
/ / i ' r r� �r � � � ' r` � �
� � , �; / ,r i / i�
� , ' � r �t � �/ / 1
�
* . f� t .� � ♦ t e . ' . w �
' ' . r r ' � . . _,
� �i� l�� i � �
fL�7 _ _ ���11t.Uti �����.-��
.G"U • . , �//lCQ � G;��f/� , .
,
`d"� u� .,�',r� `
- ��� , , . .
�{7 ,��� , ,��"L�ti� ..ldtv� �li� �l,�r�� .� 7
, -
f�G7�%rc,� .��� ,�Gr�,��a� � ?
9. .��ur� .,a.o, �nd .�n ,��n.� G� . � ,��'�
°�
dv .� ,
�
,c���, � � ..t�. �.�� �� .
�un�.� ��� ��?� c� ���
:�c� ��v c�,
�/��/y1� ���
G� .���i, -C,cTda a. ��, .�?�.-,
Y I ��;��� ���
�-� .��� ,�� .�?��� i� �G`�
��� ���
. � : �� � �`� c��-
, '�� .
��� .� .�a , � � , �
��� ��
L� y ���L���'�
.;-�`" -:�-��-:'_� � .
- . ' . : . . ' . ,. . '�, �-••� �y-
a
' .�... '�i: , `-r' • T:: . . . . Y. .. .
) �' �
��e2d o`�'a�- ,� �%1.e �2�e �in. .�'��C�G(., . : - . . - f . .. �-_ � � _ : : .
- � � / , :�-:"r - .. `•: `4, _• .•.. .--
l`i�1 �/? /,h /./T7 / ��/ ��{ Y n i � .�� �-f'iN ��n nrP / l . .
T0:
FROM:
Planning Commission
SUBJECT
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
James E. Danielson and
Public Works Director
DISCUSSION
August 21, 1985
Paul R. Berg
Code Enforcement Officer
Case No. 85-23, Tandem Corp./TCH Development Corp. Rezoning, CUP for
PUD, and Subdivision Approval for Mendota Farms
Tandem/TCF Development Corp. have applied for a CUP for a PUD. In addition
they are requesting a rezoning and subdivision review and approval They propose a
three-phase development of 137.52 acres of land into 181 lots. They have worked
with staff and affected residents for several months to develop the plans as
presented. The entire piece of property is presently zoned R-lA. Therefore, the
first step that staff will address is the rezoning to R-1.
REZONING
The applicant has addressed all the requirements set forth in the ordinance with
the exception of architectural elevation drawings. Staff feels that because of the
type of development, it would be unreasonable to require the developer to provide those
elevation drawings and recommends waiving this requirement.
CUP FOR PUD AND SUBDIVISION
The developer proposes to have many of the lots contain less than 100 feet of
frontage. However, all lots exceed the minimum 15,000 square foot area requirement.
In lieu of requesting variances for the substandard frontages, the developeriis
requesting a PUD approval. The developer has submitted all the required documents to
satisfy the ordinance. Staff has reviewed the documents and finds them in order.
One item staff has noted is that the project name relates to Mendota, not Mendota
Heights. The �ev�ioper stated that he will change the name in the final documents.
Park dedication needs to be worked out with the Park and Recreation Commission.
ACTION REQUIRED
Conduct the public hearing to consider the rezoning and PUD, and subdivision,
and based on input from the public and commission, make a recommendation to the
City Council. -
The Fire Marshal has not objections provided that there is an adequate water
supply for fire protection.
JED/PRB:madlr
�
�
CITY OF i*fEi�tt}4TA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA GOtTNTY . MINNESOTIt
APPLTCATION FOR CQNSIDERATIQN
0 F'
PLANNTNG R�QUEST
Applicant
Name: Lee C}.
LasC FirsC
Address: 1690 University Avenue, #180 St. Pau1
Number & SCreet City
Te2ephone Number: �$�+-���0
Owner
Name: Cen�re Pointe South
Last First
Address: 1690 University Avenue, #180 St. Paul
t3umber & SCreet City
Street Location of Property in QuesCian:
� Lexi.ngton and 110
Legal Description of Property:
See At�ached Legal. Description.
(:.;t s e [v o . .�J c,y�
DaCe of Application 8/22/85
Fee Pa id X;1�"'3 33 f i3� �a
�� 4.�.c�z . �'/3 � .G 3
Lar�*y
Znitial
MN 55104
S ta te Z ig
Initial
MN 55104
State Zip
Type of Request: X Rezaning
Variance
Conditional tlse Permit
CondiCional Use Perrnit for P.U.D.
:*Iinor Canditianal ilse Fermit
_ • ' Subdivision Approval
Plan Approval
W�t].ands PermiC
� Other
�
Applicable City Ordinance Number
Present Zoning of Property: BlA
Present Use of Property: Vacan�
Proposed Zaning of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
:
Business Center
Section
Number of people intended to live or work an premises: 1,000+
I hereby declare that alZ statements made in this request anfl an the additional
material are true.
� •
Si�nature a App�.icant
fi-22-�}S
Date
Received by (title}
NOTE: The following plans shall be drawn and attached to this application.
A. Applications involving a Variance shall submit the following plans:
Date Received Znitial
1. Site Development Plan
2. Dimension Plan
3. Landscape Plan
4. Grading Plan
B. Applications involving a Rezoning, Corrditional Use Permit or Subdivi.sion
shall submit the following:
l. Sketch Plan X
2. Abstractors Certificate ��
(If the subdivision inval.ves cutCing of existing parcel into Cwo or more lots).
C. Applications involving a Wetlands Permit shall submit the following:
l. A full & adequate description of all phases of the operation &/or propased
physical changes.
2. A topagraphic map of the area. Contour intervals shall be drawn at two {2}
faot intervals at a horizantal. scale of 1" = 1,Q00' or larger.
3. A detailed site plan of the proposal showing proposed drainage, grading & landscaping.
4. A site design map showing the location of existing and fuCure man-made �eaCures
within the site and to a distance of five hundred (50q) feet surrounding the site.
,=w.+ h{,��' '�a .�:M�.1Yr�'
:.� ., . r. �% .( ' �. j 'Y .
�- . _R.i r. c!.
y j, >,� . t�, . � . �,I�.:
. -',- . '�••;:,�.r„_`g;
• '--,�s .�-- �-�!-,-:',. �
; . ' :: i-.'_+r'?� 3'�`-�': � -
" . . � :. � �.�: � p'i^�
. , y ,,,, � ��� �'��,�,� -
�► �` �� :,. �".>• �=Case = :.,,
�� , � � � .:�.,�:� � ,r. '-.�� , .. • �. � ., .
s.= t � ..
r R .,.�,`., � i1r � �t �.7: •.+.r; ��, ��� :;3�
�L Sf�r�.,l�». , �.�
ITY :AF tMENDOTA�,HEIG�iTS� ,-�-,r K' �;�:` '�`.x �
AIGOTA�.�OIlN17fy:1�iZNNESOTI� �;.,: �: �!�'?���':
; � - � � � `z. •�:� ; : �•:��
2•a1'rj+ i �"'�lz�.o �'.� •� ��. �� :*G.%�'. �S• ' .,:.,
'�� ,yi
LICATION�'OR#Ci7NSIDERATION;r.x.�`.,���;��
_M..^..w....�'S:�.Js _ sr!•..' _ s_' _ .a_ a
'4rfY' � 1 i GSe .. • �y . F " r�� � t"� . �� ' �1 X
°� '"Name��.".�-°'��`71ee � �.�aar .�'�'x-�� . r s,.: , ':�ii M.i•:A . , �, .. � ^ � � _ � . _ !i _."` i./,',':�: � „` �S-
�_'�;,�7' �•�.:flI.asz���"�=�-=.. �`!F3rst�>.�'�`-��s,�'`:,.��..�.+.::Iiiitial'�' _,��`�,-.jy�y�� _�� f; :�;�i
:a � •�� .3� ,�"1'. -.�� �, �..'Sa'�� " _dc' �y+� T z� 3'. �:r�. , . ��� y -�_•�.
' . �':.:ta ��}'�}'`•"}' t%'.f�i:�i'-;�„"�.•����r�;��k�' �g�,-?1+��'���> ;j�� � :K ;r��y��^E ''c � f'' :.
:,� ':L •a .. �•4t�
Address. •1F90 �n.ivers3 �AveIIue, •�]:BO:�M� .�::�u�' �„� , ,���� •; -* � .:�104•..� -�' ,�• -
�• . _. �as. �Numbex �&':�treet�,r�,:�:.� �* �r :��3t� ��, .�c�'�...;..�State� -r.,, �;:�:--p`,. r�Zip';!��--,. ' . . . .
� _ n��.::T� M _il^.. iN• ��� 1~•v��``n•'J [ t .r� .�/;•�+l::���,:Cli � .�.e, �3 �;w'� *'" :•:' � _
• : �� �- s' : -•.::'7C - n.� � •- * s.r...:,-:�c.�... �.. .. •��no--•-��• y�'
Telephone1Number�:'-�84�-�ViJO�. � . _Jd' • � ^� 1� ,C� .����=tt_.,_• _�' =:��',.i. .x.���•-;.:.�'��=�,'�,� '.
. :-� ,_.�.`.i"-� �o��.c_ :;�'� � �•t.T�::'-X•.?V :•' _F.': � ,
• 5 ���,r .�a� 'J ':• •__ •. ��:.'•'� f � '
' c _���--�?.:::r'-T:.4.Sr:..�,R, .='� ' _ r�' �r :+j`!: �..._ cy •;�4 .i.;•L} i�Y t,�. -
. . • .: .. •:ir�• • � d• � . • :" . ,' t�!'�� :. ' . :a+M �',i�: r• ��=1C; $'-� • `� : i!:.:;y,. c :, r+' �' � •
�Li[lei �. ._ . � �__-.+:.is�.=� •'" :.,Yy._:�:.�,��:' •' — .`:.• ' -�: ?� � :+�.��' !f'^ *i ti ='.i i.�"' �! �- r.. s ' x • :. Y' : . -'
X 1 �. ' ' ' ;J'`! «,. �L.- `,.c.: -..... �:.i.�`�''�"p:V_
• ~ �'.EiT�3"2'�7.3Y��:'$OlTfil' �`" � �•i�.;. _.. . ' .'rc�;y�,, k,•-.`'-' . = :� : Sa,.' .
� Names � . _ ' *= '�'€ -�" - ,.,,,,` . . j • , • • . - - ,
�-.•
� '•Last • � • :First - � .� � <: �==nitial ��;�.`�.�; :.� � .i * .. .
, . . ., • . ' _ • . . _ .= . • _ .-. , ;�? .'r. •
' • ..• ••.,;'- '"• : .�:"' �.� _'• �' :i=�:.;" . , = • .
.�� _ „''_ '.. , i�. .
Address: � • 169D Univer�si�i � Aventie, �#T80 • �. • =St. �aiil�' ` - • -:: °='.`i''d�i -:•: •� • - . . 55104 •
. Number & Street � . . CiL�r � � ... . • • - State � _ - Zip
�treet Location of' Property 3n_ Question: " _. , . • • � �
egal•Description of Property:
See Attached Legal. Description.
ype of Request: X � Rezoning � •
. Variaace •
Conditional Use Perm t
Conditional Use Perm�t for P.U.D.
Minor Conditianal Use Permit .
. Subdivision Approval
� • Plan Approvai '
" Wetlands Permit
Other
.,t �+ ;;1 .�'r :�•.:
.fi't r w• t t ^l� ' w ' X,,;..i;�'F •IIy. %M y t: r�}' "" ' • 7iw? .11k r'7"'��'r+.:. ` �i: ".;. ;�l� X��"+"''{(.y�,7"� -�%a
��¢.j�.' tf^ tk-lt..T.t'^�f�:.h: y�!jx" ,�'^ v / `C�.:.' t �t''i: -t.�°�•.y'. '!'t � ,,,^ �sra.i `.f� ,� ,•/"', ;�;:"H7�
�. �}'�' � "+" iei'��.+�.'�'}�;F` :,�,,.,•' ��. •� � "�;�� j.ri,�' ,"rcr.�*��a�';t;�' � ,►,:,:'-�r.;�Y":�` (,;:';�. S
- ��Y... �,� ,,�+3;� '�"�y•tr�','����%�,f}:'aG�..;I•'L � �*-�'�`""h=,'ri�;,j.� yy�c.���"r'••.•7t�:�`'it` �' :r�` � /i+f'4; y ..ylii"
i y'MRJy t� r ` : ''�',+ ;' , .r�,��.! '-1'"' +%1'.�`�, ' : �'1R
�,r� -�'� ::'r +�Y.s`-�`��", �. . . �:�'•':�:••; "ir�• '".l•.a:'' � , y`. i �L f '>'i .�• i�'�}' ..,..4�r! � .. �,,y�.�;
-S.�sL ;1,.'G w• -T'1' �..:+ =+ ; rs:;;< �* ^ �r' �.. t �+ . �; ti 3 : - ��a�' a" '+ ' y .Y,.
-?a • .;�,r"��t�,'�_ r " : �► r �;!;: �"`t�: - �^.i_ 'c"' 'u ?+• '?!?�i w • .-%�c• �` ' +� 1,>�.;�=C.i�f _ :- i
�y :i
,: .+�- ��X.%�`.:;' :�.""�+:�'rr.;�`� �v�i'; c-'., .,��v�:.'..'.`�1���y'`w:s�«��'iL:,l�*�.*+iiL'u.�':t-'r::.�J•,i�t� �'i �"� �'r�a;
��'� ;ti: Y + ���PPlicable ,:Citq� Ord3nance''filumber�ac�.'=-_',-.�;.. �:•;ra,�,:r: ";Section r. ''����n-���.-� ��
r +;y+y.Y.� ,�. r r.� y'� r.,.- .y �wr:.� . : ^ . }�� . , �• •i�•• . . � •' . n r
1 ��. "'Rf ���,�z5�'�'� i .I �'��i�i :.G�i'J.:��4v�n. :4}i • �Y�7t_f;�.,�,a;?'.i�1!•_�;•' :•�i.q ;+ ••:'+''t' .4'�i.•s �i7•.�i'�'i�
:�ti'f . _,t. )'.•' � ' w'•{ . ... �. ..-�x : Yt, �e' :'` ` • � �+': . ' • `.. .4. rk,1��u ,�''
�" r i.�'��e�Qli "Zon3n,g:�f: Property: �$!ri%F��:..t;.... f�`.: k� i 3'-r„t r or- �a�•:.� � ...
:. ' y.,; ' ' ' •
.a : � rr.: . p,�4'.r: ry .tt'.'. .. • -tt ;'r: "�'�}M.�
. . . . .. . .. ...
. ,
.
.
c�' :��+��..'-ti`�s..;n€•:t� 3� "f•�::r�,.•i':.�'..r'�`"1.-•�:. ' "'"_ '• �• t _ . ;*-�.,��... _... .. . �
•. . .
.. ., . , r 4�'�:r�! ... r t.ti._-� � B.-::r_. -',�► � � - -t .�__'.. . .. -- - .'s_ Yrsi�_�t•.,t';G.iGi:e
�i'�` X �� rD�OS�a�z"�S}�'.`.-�.iDf �I�P��"�-".r��1I18SS'�2Tl�P.r'�� . `� �' i � ••'��"'d'.�k����.,"�,c,����i�'KYNr �
`#". ;t�^ .c: •,.i. "s'''"'��-i-r' t:�<,t i� . , "' � .
a.�'i � "e'�z� � i. C: .''x'� ' �f"r��y��' ��+�. ' -5tay' ar'..i�¢�� .��+; :.S . ' �? . .. ..�.�,y�+�.. i.'� �--T •�^-�^i'ti�M4�^!jk�"-'j'�. <
��.��'�,�'t;. i''�s""s��'r'�� r;i.��� � :�"'i:-�,-.�Vr���"i+t4'�� +'��a%:r�,,,c�,(ry,.•'.`!►:,�L'ii.i':•..' : Xir".�!,;�`� Sy.<7M•.�r''�}ry.'���.' .f� � .
�:.,tr:;���. ."Nua-ber�of.;,peap].e�3.ntended;tn'-`live= or =work� on:premises: `�.;fl00�-�`•�'t `;�''.�.T"�`�-., s.�,;,?.�it'
tai.. . .s., . ' . C� •.•:'� '� .A ' . � !
:. v.��y' _sX �r; a,Y+-' � �^ '� '�. i �s .;'i'�- �'J�� �' * �.i �v�' �,r'. '�°.: i w':"'.�;. 3`�.` ,s�,,,Jk-r� v_ L-� � v,:: _�i,'x?•i�'C " �i.z�.'�' � �'' . ?�.,�s.� �" '�w'
•,�i':,•k� -,St.,,,�.�,4 ».�N" s.4, : "'e:�- r''=� <i �?.':'L'_:'* „]`+i..-:,'�� '=.'�; �.:i•. ti. �T - ,„� ,... n^"��'"r• '!;'�,Zr"X�`-_ "` �dl
•'' � � = . , 2 y �, s.•: w: ��,. 'a"� ... .:. .- 4•: , t,.� �+�• � ��/� �e l,z. `- , t' .� � � :� - ���w Z�.�,7�,* �'*r d��;.�rt+�`i�_.r,. �'�• a
`;;a�?�_r',ir�,�=• `��"���:.7:`:" �'�� .� =i�i'siY%�-'r'i�yh `,i:-!',tJ��.��,}�Ci'..�+-N�'c!sa►����tL;��.'"�.r'ri-.� "t'�'F V ..t,3.• ��,,. ��11��
' '��;�+.....��`iiereby.declare'`that':au:statements-made���.n-�his request'�and on'�he.add3tional�:��•
. L?;�. . _ ;�'��
., � � ��y,. � -:' - ,:• • �.r.��-'-^y' t •` - - '. �r : ., . a_. � _ . ,1 �._•j:'•..t2`� . ..,
. irx - " .,c.,':_ " ':!7'�:�i:.+ .�: •i�t'+• ' ' '�Fr • �. •.. , . '�✓��Ci, •-"r. . ' .r
' �..'isj_:y'►�`� . :ji.=.y+.�,� .s.'iioi-�, `f;•�7 .:a.i�rs''s.-.:?1::r.. .�,Py� ��' »T ��.:J�.'��+: s.; .t"`!"<_�.$�::;;��s
.. :�;<• _�ti•f.'_ '}�•:�' �':�^'� :;��'�,`+y'•:.: :-5�..- .�:+ .. . - ,l., 1�-T. t.7�1'� •� .+..�•-r: :�: "�,�t.'r�}.�
=" ..l _ �material are . triie.'.. :'-'- _' . �� :.� _ - " ;;,,���� ; _ . - �.� �-s �..--�� ;;-' .� • :��.;r� '' Y�;= icr.� `�'
- ; ,.�: * : � _ � : .:.: :,�, `.,�_ _.,.,_�;:
_ _ . '� � � _.'~ - � ' :.: � � � ; L� e._.,. . •.�.
•,: • , _ � • . �. : �;. � ,..�,;
s„ : ' ' ' • ir�!''1 _ i � .�� � �.i «' 'i ...�.+ v. �, ' -.Y . � •,�.
�•{��+�+ �«L ��.. -- •M�• _ �i, •K•,%iy'iri�F�, _ f.�:v�'• ':J�Wv}�r� ,�� . 'Y��_ �..4`.� � . �I`f��r+.�Y�w�Y:i` =�
T'µ �i_y'�'. � ..'i� r�+� :ti+.+�4.,'.'�_ ' _'•�� •�• � y ,�r`. �, ' i�.���
�s �� �:•rr..�•: ,� s. :.r• � -`:'i�,.�:a: � ' �`' `r .'�i �•' • -'. • �;
� � z��_-- __:;�`: r:' : � .; .K •:�.;; :�- <:-�`.�s:.. : c�':. � � � '� 'n -.' .:- . � Signature �o pplicant� -;�=r ~.:}_ .�:�r.` w
. • _ `'Y �_ _T ,.jt..``� .,� ,,,4��:<:�.�..�...»,t � t� ' �...,—.'+r�,�t'r-i.��....� ._ .�_,';_.�.��;�".��, '�,..tiw-��'�'t� r�'-i�-.Y'S;
•.• '�4.� � ; �•�
. :x.�M ~ _ r::C` _ •.r '. ±'�"'� '. ^'>,„,F;�,y� 'r`: � ,. " ^ . . - .. ..ry � . _ , ..,...�...._.. c C :'r��t . � � i:;; • - .
�� 1. � 'i,• . �� � �� '�%>�... � +
, •w .',L • : _ `i�J i�- �` ••• ` ~ � . J. • ;� •. . ' . I � . � • i ' � r. �. ' .' i� .. , . � ' . '
. �i.� _ � � � . � - ' • . � ' � . � � � •• Y
" - , 4����: . �`•. • :.�� '''.. ' ��,,,j;�,�'�'�` �„�..i Date r,._... +�='�.,,.'�.":'�.o�'~.i.� :;a'-�3�5-�2'�,� :;4
- � '.. ' ' ._ � . __._. . _.. ___. - - -_... . �.._� ...__.._ _ • : . ._ _ .�._._�._ _. - . . ..
_ � . - Received by (title) � � ' • �
. , . • � -- . . ' • --- ' ' �
NOTE:� Tlte following pZans sha12 be drawn and�attached to this applicatian:
A. Applications involving a Variance shall.snbmit the following plans:
Date Received Initial
1. Site Deveiopment P2an __ - .
2. Dimension Plaa • - �� •- • _ •
3. Landscape Plan
4. ' Grading Plan • - _ �
B. Applications 3nvolving a Rezoning, �onditiona2 Use Permit or Subdivision
shalZ submit the following: _
2. Sketch Plan X �
� 2. Abstractars Certificate ��� �
(Zf the subdivision involves cutting of existing parcel into �wa or more lots).
C. Applications involving a Wetlands permit shall submit the follawing.
. 1.. A fu1Z & adequate description of alI phases of the aperatian �jar progosed
. physical changes. �
2.. A topographic map af the ares. Contour intervals shall be drawn at•two (2)
� f oot ir►rervals. at a hoziz+�sttal scale of .1" = 1,000 • or larger.
3. A detail.ed site plan of the proposal showing proposed drainage, grading 6 landscaj
4: A site design map shawing the lacation o£ exiating and future maa-�made features
within the site and to a distance of'five hundred (500) feet surrou�ding the site,
WILLIAM L. WILSON
Councilman
�
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
OP`FICE OF TAP� CITY COUNCIL
August 22, 1985
Mayor Robert Lockwood
Mendota Heights City Hall
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120
Dear Mayor Lockwood and Members of the City Council:
As you are
for an elec
trie consu
writing is
impacts of
out if you
palities to
MARK VOERDING
i.�atai8ct�e n;ae
aware, Northern States Power Company has filed a request
.ric rate increase of 13.4� per cent which will cost elec-
�ers an additional $129 million each year. My purpose in
,o ask if you, as a public official, have considered 'the
his rate increase in your co�anunity, and secondly, to find
are interested in joining a consortium with other munici-
challenge this request.
We in St. Paul are very concerned about how the proposed increase
affects residential users, particularly since it follows on the heels
of a requested gas rate increase. These users will be especially hurt
because they will carry a greater portion of the rate increases
(15.05% compared to 13.44� overall for electricity, 8.89� compared to
7.05� overall for gas). Because of our concern, we have already
intervened in the gas rate case, and support for this action has been
overwhelming.
Beyond this, the proposed electric rate increase will have an adverse
impact on city budgets. We have projected, for example that it will
cost St. Paul an additional $400,000 per year to operate street
lights, traffic signals, water pumps and other electric services. Of
particular concern is NSP's proposal to eliminate the pumping class
for large municipalities. �
To assist you in evaluating the NSP rate increase on Mendota Heights,
I have enclosed rates of comparison which apply to municipal services
and comparisons of present and proposed residential, farm and
cocrgnercial rates.
Finally, I propose that, as concerned cities, we join together as a
consortium to intervene in this electric rate case. NSP's proposal
should have similar effects on all cities, so it is appropriate to
join together, and, if a number of cities become involved, the cost
CITY HALL SEVE:NTH FLOUR SA1NT PAUL, MINNESOTA SS102 612/298-4646
�46
would be low. There are a number of ways in which the consortium
could be set up to allow for participation by individual municipali-
ties as well as members of the Suburban Rate Authority.
Please let me know as soon as possible about your concerns regarding
this electric rate inerease. At this time, I am not looking for a
commitment or the organizational structure, but rather your interest
and ideas. �
Respectfully,r
,-1 ,
� , / •� '�I
, /,� �
/ fti-�l/�'ii" ' ���`-'
r/ William L. Wilson
Councilman
WLW:jca
Enc.
NartBen St�tes torer Cav�att (Mieaesot�)
Electr u UtilJtY - St�te o( qinnesol�
SUHMAYf OF EIECTYIC SAIES IND YEVE►IUE INCtEASFS - PiOPOSEO
lest Yur Eadiep SeDle�Der 19bL '
Ivefl4t
Service Scbedule Custour
Qeside�ti�l
Aesideoti�l Serriu 800,378
Yesideati�l Service-i0D 63
Fu� Serrice l,039
Duil Fuel Se�rice 2J7 �
SuDtol�l Q09,p7
Couerci�l �ad ladustri�l
------------------------
Sull ie�er�l Serrice 55,76/
S�all ieaeril Serrice-TOD 2.386
Geue��l Service J2,559
ieaer�l Service-TOD 112
Pe�k lalerruDtiDle Serrice 10
Eaer9rCoulrolled Service I
D�recl Cur�eet Se�vice IClosed) J6
Subtol�) 90,910
OtAer S�les to 1uDllc 1utlorlties
-----------•---------------------
Sull puoiciD�J Pu�Dia9 Service 1,128
MuaiciD�l luapiny Ser�ice (Gocelled) )25
Nicotlel M�ll Service-Mpis 2
Fire � Civil Def Siren Service /27
St. 1etAony F�IIs lotk iad Du 1
SuDtot�l 2,283
Streel ud Ira li9htiap
Streel liyAtinp-Co�p�nY O�aed 90] .
Streel liq9tiay-Custo�e� U�aed 11)
Aulo Prolective Lightiag 2l,3)0 t
Subtot�) 22,990
iot�l tel�il 925,660
Serricr Caaectia+ ievenue
l�te P�r�eat Yeveaue
Tot�l 1eve�ue
Suuer
C�Icul�ted leveaues (0o0's)
- -------��M--------
S�les IIWNI Suuer Yinler Aaau�l lacre�s�
--------�------------------ --------------------- ------------------'--- ------------------------ ---------------•-
Y�ater /nau�l Ireseat Provosed Ireseot Iroposed Preseat Provosed laouat ►trcenl
1,7f2,310 3,551,010 S,7A,]2l t116,677 i137,890 =209,283 t237,1�2 f325,960 t375,022 ' i19,Ob2 IS.OSI
21) 711 ' 950 15 11 I) 10 52 S7 S 9.S2I
57,710 I/6.IYD Y06,1/) 3,62� 1,2)3 Y,021 0,062 11,i17 ll,ll5 I,IBB 12.761
l0a 3,158 3,266 ] S 100 106 !O7 Ill U 7.77i
1,Y50,70/ 3,703,10& 5.55].691 t120,]11 t111.195 t2U,Nl f2/L,110 t3J7,762 i788,�25 tSO,Sb] ll.f7t
152,/6D 330,029 /82,189 �10,290 t12,205 f2U,393 32],I1/ t30,68) =35,619 =/,l3� IS.09I
O,lll 1/.191 12.J25 175 525 790 Y56 l,265 I,JAI 11� f.l7i
3,797,508 �,970,N6 l0,767,955 177,890 l99,518 292,))I 331,995 170,661 531,SIJ �0,852 l2.9Ii
Y20,181 1,503,983 2,)21,167 26,863 31,099 /9,95] S],566 J6,81� �1,665 5.619 ]./21
101,325 98.203 199,528 J,]19 �,816 , 7,39B Y,766 10,7/) 12,182 1,/3S l�.76I
1,199 2,010 ],209 33 J� 56 �3 09 101 12 13./11
/� 125 l66 20 �1 /2 /1 �2 ' 65 7 5.I2I
/,oB0,9S1 Y,910,88Y 1],199,01] t220,920 t217,22Y f371,/03 i119,10/ t592,7Y3 t665,S26 t1J,403 12.76t
t,671 • 6,075 Y,706
Y),00J 1N.02] 23I.026
230 �,Y7/ 1,101
553 557
Y9,Ob1 151,5Y5 Y11,369
59,220
E1,515
72,/89
15),121
19,901,311
�t157 . t196 =J21 t799 i171 f595 t121 25.12i
/,100 /,685 �,233 7,268 10,333 11,95] 1,620 15.pI
11 1J . 19S 221 2DJ 2]1 2J !].13I
] N l5 17 22 15 3 13.61I
� 12 S 12 � 92.961
i1,271 11,901 t6,771 l7,917 111,012 t12,819 t1,77] l6.09I
' : .,
f8,928 t9,586 f65Y ).3)I
2,911 J,274 356 12.29I
1,506 2,J78 2)2 10.Y5I
t11,716 115,636 t1,288 Y.98t
t955:/75 t1�082�ID6- =lY6�B31 1I.2)1
i1,210 12,97� i1,736
12,755 i1,121 t766
t959,00 f1,068,103 i128,933 13./II
--..._.. ---•--...-- •-------
---•--•- ----• ...... ........
m
►d
W
(D
O (~D �
M �+
N I
ro[�
N
1
r
�
Narthern Sta�es Pawer Cam�ny (M) Exhibit (PJZ-I) ` �`
Electric Utility - State o� Minneso�a Schedul.e � .,
CQMPARISON OF PRESENT AND PROP05ID RATES Page I. of 16
PRESr.'"I�1T PRt1POSID
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE
Custamer Gharge $3.St3 54,50
Ener�y Charge: (cen�s per kWh}
Winter: First 1404 kb�7h 5.22 6.30 • ,
Ex�ss kWt�i 4.36 4.88
S�maYtez: All kWh • 5.71 7.11
Ft�,: Winter/Sisnmer - per kwh .339j.336 .00Q/.00p
Gonservatian Rate Break
i0 or iess kWh per day 53.50 $4.50
10.1 - 13.3 kWh per day $1.75 $2.25
RESIDENTIAL TIME OE DAY SII2VICE .
Custaner Charge $3.50 $4.50
TOD Metering Cha�rge $3.i0 �4.55
�ergy Charge: {cents per kWh)
On-Peak '
Win�er: All kWh� 7.76 IQ.82
St�mer: All kWh ' 9.3I. I3.36
Off-Peak
Win�er: All kwh 3.35 3.10 -
S�nme� : All kV3t�t 3.35 3.14
E'�'+,: Winter/SuRmer - per kWh .339/.336 .000/.OQO
Conservation Rate Break
10 or les� kWh per day � $3.50 $4.50
1.0.1 - i3.3 kWh per day 51.75 $2.25
ENE.RU"Y-�CANTROLLED DUAL �'UEL SERViC:,'
Custaner Charge $1.75 $2.00
Energy Chargez (cents per kWh}
Stanc3ard: AIl kWh 2.83 3.21
Optional: Winter � 2.83 3.21 .�
5�er 5.71 7,11
'EC.��: Winter/S+smzer - per kWh .339/.336 .OQO/.000
. •t •
0
Northern States Power Comgany (M) Exhibit (PJZ-1)
Electric Utility - State of Minnesota Schedule 5
CAMPARISON OF PRESIIVT AND PROPOSID RATFS Page 2 of 16
PRFS"r.NT PROP06r�
RESIDENTIAL DUAL EUEL SPACE i�ATING.SERVICE
-�NCII�LID TO ENERGY-CONTROLLED DUAL FUEL SERVICE-
ESnen?y Charge: (cents per kWh)
All kwh 2.83
FG�,: Winter/S�atmer - per kWh ' .339/.336
LIMITID OFF-PEAK SERVICE
------------------------
Custamer Charge
Single Phase $2.00
Three Phase $3.00 '
Monthly Minimun Charge
Single Phase
Three Phase
Energy Charge: (cents per kWh)
All kWh .
$6.00
$8.00
2. 50
E'C�,: Winter/Sutmer - per kWh . .000/.000
AUTCMATIC PROTDCTIVE LIQiTING SERV��
Area IInits
� 100 W High Pressure Sod iiun $5 . 90 $6. 70
250 W High Pressuze Sodiun 8.85 10.55
175 W Mezcury (Closed) 5.90 6.70
400 W Mercury (Closed) , 8.85 10.55
Directional Units
250 W High Pressure Sa3 iian $11. 25 $13. 00
400 W High P�essure Soditan 13.50 16.00
400 W Mercury (Closed) 11.25 13.00
_ . . 1 MW Mercury (Closeci) 19.95 24.40
FCA: Winter/Suamer (cents per kWh) .339/.336 .000/.000
Northern States Power Canpany (M) Exhibit (PJZ-1)
Electric Utility - State of Minnesota Scheduie 5
COMP_ARISON OF PRESENr APID PROPOSID RATES Page 3 of 16
PRESENT PROPOSr.�D
FAId�! SERVICE
Custaner Charge $4.00 $5.00
Energy Charge: (cents per kWh)
Winter: First 2000 kWh
Excess kWh
S�armer: All kWh
EC.�: Winter/S�atmer - per kWh
5.22 • 6.30
4.36 4.88
5.71 7.11
.339/.336 .000/.000
Conservation.Rate Break
10 or less kWh per day ' $3.50 $4.50
10.1 - 13.3 kWh per day $1.75 $2.25
3�SALL GENERAL SERVI�
----------------------
Custaner G'�arge $4.25 $5.45
Energy Charge: (cents per kWh)
Winter: All kWh . 5.22 6.30
S�mer: All kWh 5.71 7.11
FC�,: Winter/S�mer - per kWh .339/.336 .000/.000
SMALL GENERAL TIME OF LIAY SERVICE �
.._.._....,.--------------------------
Custaner Charge
TOD Metering Charge
Enezgy Charge: (oents per kwh)
On-Peak
Winter: All kWh
Summer: All kWh
Of�-Peak
Winter: All kwh
S�atmez: All kWh
$4.25 $5.45
$3.40 $5.00
6.68 9.21
7.63 10.77
3.55 3.13
3.55 3.13
FC�: Winter/S�mer - pez kWh .339/.336 .000/.000
DIRD�T CURRF�IT SERVZCE (CLOSID)
Custaner Charge $4.25 $5.45
Denand Charge
per Month-per kW of connected load
Energy Charge: (cents per kWh)
Winter: All kWh
Summer: All kWh
e.�-. . �o: .. a... _ /c. ..._... _ ..,,� u?�.
$2.25 $2.25
5,22 6.30
5.71 7•11
��o � »� .nn� i. nnn
�
�
Northern States Power Ccmpany (M) Exhibit (PJZ-1)
� Electric Otility - State of Minnesota Schedule 5
• COMPARISON OF PRESENT AND PROPOSID RATES Page 4 of 16
� PRESENr PROPOSED
GEDIERAL SII�VICE
Custcmer Charge $16.00 $23.80
Demacx3 Charge
� Winter: First 100 kW $4.76 $6.55
Exc�ss kW 4.55 6.55
S�nner: First 100 kW • 6.26 8.05
Excess }dnl • 6v05 8.05
D�nand Voltage Disco�mts: All KW •
Primary $0.40 $0.55
Transnission Transfo �ned 1a20
Transnission 1.75 1.80 ,
Energy Charge: (cents per kWh)
All kWh 2.50 2.84
Energy Voltage Discounts: All kWh ' .
Primary 0.06 0.07
Transnission Transfoaned 0.11
Transmission • 0.13 0.14
E'C?,: Winter/S�utmer - per kWh .339/.336 .000/.000
�
0
Northern States Power Canpany (M) Exhibit (PJZ-1)
Electric IItility - State of Minnesota Schedule 5
• COMPARISON OF PRESIIVT AND PROPOSr:D RATES � Page 5 of 16
� � + h
PRFSEI�TP PROP0.Sc'�
GEDIERAL TIME OF DAY SERVICE
Customer Charge $16.00 $23.80
TOD Metering Charge $5.90 $6.45
DEsnar�d Charge
- On-Peak
Wintez: First 100 kW '. $4.76 $6.55
Excess }d� 4.55 6.55
��mer: First 100 kW 6.26 8.05
Excess kW 6.05 8.05
Off-Peak •.
All kinl in Excess �
, of On-Peak kW $1.75 $1.80
Denand Voltage Discounts: All F�n]
pr��y 50.40 $0.55
Transnission Transfoaned 1.20
• Transnission 1.75 1.80
�iergy Charge: (cents per kWh)�
On-Peak: All kWh 2.85 3.26
Off-Peak: All kWh 2.19 2.47
. Energy Voltage Discoimts: All kWh
Pr��y 0.06 0.07
Transnission Transfoaner3 p.0
Transnission 0.13 0.14
F(�: Winter/S�mmer - per kWh .339/.336 .000/.000
�
Northern States Power Ccm�ny (M) . E�hibit (PJZ-1)
Electric Utility - State of Minnesota Schedule 5
COMP.�,RISON OE PRFSII� AND PROPOSID RATES Page 6 of 16
PRESr."NT PROPOSED
PFAK�ONTROLLED SERVICE
Custaaer Charge $16.00 $23.80
Fiun Denarrl Charge
Wint�r: First 100 kW $4.76 $6.55
Excess kW , 4.55 6.55
S�sner: First 100 kW 6.25 8.05
Excess !dd 6.05 8.05
Controllable Dsnand Discount
Al1 kW � $2.00 $2.00
D�narr7 Voltage Discounts: AlI kW
Primary $0.40 $0.55
Transnission Transfoaned 1.20
Transnission ' 1.75 1.80
Controllable Service Interruption
Credit all Voltages per kW per Month $1.00 $1.00
Energy Charge:
All kWh
Energy Voltage Discounts: AlI kWh
Pr imary
Transmission Transfoaned
Transnission
EC�: Winter/Sunner - per kWh
4
" 2.50 2.84
0.06 0.07
0.11
� O.I3 0.14
.339/.336 .000/.000
�
�
0
Northern States Power Canpany (M) Exhibit (PJZ-1)
Electric Utility - State of Minnesota Schedule 5
COMPARISON OF PRESENT AND PROPOSID RATES Page 7 of 16
PRFSEI� PROPOSID
'M � PFAK-�ONTROLLID TIME OF DAY SERVI�
Custaner Charge $16.00 $23.80
Time of Day Metering Charge . � $5.90 $6.45
Fian Denar�d Charge
On-peak peziod denand �
•� Winter: Eirst 100 kW $4.76 $6.5�
. Excess kW 4.55 6.55
Siatmer: First 100 kW 6.26 8.05
Excess 1d�T 6.05 8.05
Controllable Denani Disoount •
On-peak period: All Denar�d
Fian/Controllable: Off-peak
per iod demar�d in ex�ss
of on-peak period
denand - per kW
Denand Voltage Discounts: All }d�7
Primary
Transnission Transfo anFx3
Transn iss io n
Controllable Service Interruption
Credit all Voltages per kW per Month
Energy Charge: All kWh (cents per kWh)
On-peak
. �_.. Of f-peak
Energy Voltage Discounts: All kwh
Primary
Transnission Transfo �ned
Transmission
$2.00 $2.00
$1.75 $1.80
$0.40
1. 75
$1.00
2. 85
2.19
0.06
0.13
- $0.55
1.20
1.80
$1.00
3. 26
2.47
0. 07
0.11
0.14
Fc�: Winter,'Sunner - per kWh .339/.336 .000/.000
Northern States Powpx Com�xiny (M) Exhibit (PJZ-1)
Electric Utility - State of Minnesota Schedule 5
COMPARISON OF PRESENT AND PROPOS� RATFS Page $ of Z6
PRFSEIJr PROPOSr."D
PEAK INTERRUPTIBLE LAR� GENERAL SERVICE (CLOSID)
Custaner Charge $255.00 $255.00
. Denaryd Charge
On-peak period denand , $3.10 $4.53
' Off-peak period danar�d
in.excess of on-peak period
danar�d - per kW $1.55 $1.80
� Denand Voltage Diswunts: All EQnT
Primary $0.40 $0.55
Transnission Transfoaned i�, 1.20
Energy Charge: All kWh (cents per kWh) �
On-geak� 2.78 3.26
Off-peak 1.82 2.47
,
Energy Voltage Discount: All kWh
Primary . _ 0.06 0.07
Transmission Transfoaned t� 0.11
E'C�: Winter/S�a�ner - per kWh .339/.336 .000/.000
�
�
Northern States Power Cam�ny (M) Exhibit (PJZ-1) ..
Electric Utility - State of Minnesota Schedule 5 "`
COMPARISON OF PRF,SII�IT AI�ID PROPOSID RATES Page 9 of 16
PRFSEI� PROPOSr'�
"' ENERGY�ONrROLLED SERVICE
(Present shown rates are Oil Int�erruptible)
. . Custaner Charge • $255.00 $23a80
Time of Day Metering G'�arge t�, $6.45
Fir•n Demand Charge
On-peak period denand $3.10 $4.53
Fian/Controllable: Off-peak•
pe=iod denand in excess
� of on-peak period '
demand - per kw $I.55 $1.80 �
Dena� Voltage Discounts: All F�nT
Primary $0.40 $0.55
Transnission Transfoaned 1.20 �,
Transn ission I�, 1. 80
Enezgy Charge: All kWh (cents per kWh)
On-peak I.97 3.26
Off-peak . 1.82 2.47
Energy Voltage Discount: All kWh
Primary 0.06 0.07
Transnission Transfo aned 0.11
Transnission I� 0.14
E7nergency Service �
All energy used during the
Controll� Period - per kWh 15.1 9.64
E'CA: Winter/S�mner - per kWh .339/.336 .000/.000
�
No�rhern States Power Cam�ny (M} Exhibit (PJZ-lj
Electric Utility - State of Minnesota Sc:�ec3ule 5
COMPARI5CN OF PRF.SEIVr AND PROPOSID FAT�5 Page 10 of 16
PRESENr PROPOSED
4IL ZKrERRUPTIBLE LAR� �NERAi. SERVICE
_......__...�........___».._......_.._....__....___...._�..
- C�NCELLED TO ENERG'��ONTROLLID SERVICE -
Custaner Charge $255.00 t�,
Time of Day i�ter ing Charge NA t�
Fiacm D�nand G`�arge
pn-geak period denand $3.10 I�,
Firm/Gantrollable: Off-peak
period dananci in �cess
of on-�aeak period
d�nar�d - �r kW S1.5� NA
Demand Voltage Discounts: All KW
Primary $0.�#0 t�,
Enen3Y Cha�ge: AII k'Wh (cents per kWh)
On-peak � 1.97 I�
Off-�eak - 1.82 1�
Energy Voltage Discount: All kWh
Primary 0.06 NA
Ilaergency Service
All energy used during the
Contralleci Feriod - per k'Wh Z5.1 NA
• E'C�: Winter/Su�ttuer - per kWh .339/.336 .000/.Q04
�
Northern States Power Canpany (M) Exhibit (PJZ-1)
Electric Utility - State of Minnesota Schedule 5
COMPARISON OF PRFSIIVT AI�ID PROPOSID RATES Page 11 of 16
PRESENT PROPOSID
STREET LIGHTING SERVICE
-----------------------
COMPANY OW[�D
E�008 OVERF�AD
70 W HPS
100 W F-iPS
150 W i-II�S
. 250 W F�S
400 W I�S
i�009 CUSTOM UNDERGFtOLTrID
� 70 W EIPS
100 W HPS
150 W EIPS
250 W HPS
COMPANY (7W[�tID (Closed)
I�108 OVERHFAD .
175 W MV
' 250 W MV
400 W � MV
700 W MV
I0�0 W MV
200 W HPS
2500 L INCD
E48EH0 -1 FLR
E72H0 -4 FLR
$8.90
9.15
10.15
12. 65
15.45
'12. 30
12.55
13.55
16.05
9.15
10.15
12.65
18.00
21.45
12.15
9.00
11.40
17.80
$9.60
9.90
10.80
14.10
17.80
13.35 '
13. 60
15.45
18. 65
�
10.10
11.00
14.40
21. 80
25.55
13.50
9.20
11. 60
18.70
�•�", i�109 CUSTOM UNDERGROUND (Closed)
175 W MV 12.55 13.80
250 W MV 14.05 15.70
0
:� �
0
Northern Stat�es Power Can�xiny (M) Exhibit (PJZ-1)
Electric Utility - State of Minnesota . Schedule 5
' COMPARISON OF PRFSENT AND PROPOSID RATES Page 12 of 16
PRFSF�iP PROPOSID
STREET LIQiTING SF�tVICE (continued)
CUSTOMER OWNID
K5009 ORI�,I�NTAL
Group I
250 W MV
400 W MV
100 W MV
175 W MV
250 W MV
400 W MV
700 W MV
1000 W MV
175 W MV
250 W MV
400 W MV
250 W HPS
70 W EIPS
100 W HPS
150 W I�S
200 W HPS
250 W EIPS
400 W HPS
1000 W I�S
400 W HPS
Group II
100 W MV
100 W ,1V
175 W MV
250 W MV
400 W MV
70 W F�S
100 W I�S
150 W HPS
200 W F�S .
250 W HPS
400 W HPS
�
hQt
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
24
24
24
hQJ
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
24
MN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
0
$3.35
4. SO
2. 85
3. 60
4.50
6.70
10 . 75
14.30
5.35
6.95
10.65
4.50
3.15
3.55
4.15
5.00
5. 75
7.85
15.85
1. 85
2.35
3.10
4.00
6. 20
2.15
2.55
3.15
4. 00
4. 75
6.60
$4.00
5. 80
3.25
4. 25
5. 50
5.15
13. 40
17.90
6.35
8.55
13.00
5.05
3.55
4.05
4.85
5. 70
6.75
9.10
19.70
14.13
2.30
2. 95
3. 95
5.20
7.55
2. 80
3.30
4.10
4. 95
6.00
8.20
_ Group III
175 W MV AN .3.45 4.15
250 W MV AN 4.35 5.40
400 W MV AN 6.25 7.85
100 W HPS AN 3.15 3.80
150 W I�S AN 3.75 4.60
200 W HPS AN 4.60 5.45
250 W i�S ' AN 5.35 6.50
400 W HPS AN 7.30 8.70
0
Northern States Power Can�ny (M) Exhibit (PJZ-1)
Electric Utility - State of Minnesota �Schedule 5
COMPARISON OF PRESII� APID PI�OPOSID RATES Page 13 of 16
PRES"r.NT PROPOSID
� STREET LIQiTING SIItVIC� (continued)
�UST�MER (7�lt�TID (continued)
Gzoup IV (Closed)
100 W MV AN
175 W MV AN
250 W MV • AN
400 W MV AN
70 W I�S AN
' 100 W i�S AN
150 W HPS AN .
200 W I�S AN
250 W HPS AN
400 W I-iPS AN
1000 W HPS AN
� 55 W LPS . AN
180 W LPS AN
- 6000 L INCD AN
100 0 W i�i , AN
F72H0 -2 ELR
KT008 Traffic Signal
CUSTOMER aWt�D (Closed )
KS109 ORI�MENTP,L
1000 L INC�
2500 L II�D
4000 L INCD
6000 L INCD
10000 L INCD
• 15000 L II�D
' F48IIi0 -1 FLR
F72H0 -1 ELR
F72Fi0 -2 FLR
F72H0 -4 FLR
F72EH0 -1 FLR
F72EH0 -2 FLR
F72EH0 -4 FLR
E7?.gi0 -2 ELR 2/Z
F72EH0 -4 FLR 2/2
• F72EH0 -2 FLR
AN
AN
AN
AN
P�N
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
AN
24
0
$1. 50
2.35
3.20
5.10
1. 00
1. 40
2.00
2. 70
3.45
5.30
12.30
1.00
2.80
4.50
12.25
2.45
1.60
2. 40
3.40
4.65
6.00
8.50
11.70
4.55
3.45
4. 50
7. 70
4.65
6.65
12.05
6.80
10.55
10.10
$1. 90
2. 95
4.05
6.�0
1. 20
1.75
2.50
3.40
4.35
6.75
15. 65
1. 20
3.55
5. 70
15.60
3.10
1.90
2. 80
4.15
5.75
7.45
10.60
14.60
5.15
3.95
5.20
9.10
5.45
S.OS
14. 90
. 7. 80
12.90
12.25
v.
� Nor�hern States Power Canpany (M) Exhibit (FJZ-1)
- Electric IItil.zty - State of Mit3nesata � Sc'�ec2ule 5
COMPARIS4N OE PRESIIVT AND PROYOSID RATES Page 14 og 16
PRFS�,NT PROLaOS�
� STREET LIGHTING SII2ViCE (continued)
CITY OF ST. PA(JL
KS2Q9 ORI�.MENTAL
. ?SO4 L INGD AN $2,24 $2.75
4000 L ItVC� AN 3.40 4.30
100 W MV ' AN 1.50 1.9Q
175 W MV AN . 2.35 2.95
250 W MV AN 3.20 4.05
� 400 W MV AN 5.14 6.50
, 700 W MV AN 8.55 10.90
?4 W HPS A[d 1. QO 1. 25
I.00 W HPS • AN I.40 I.75
15Q W F�S AN• • 2.00 2.50 '
250 W HFS AN 3.45 �.35
400 W F�S AN 5.30 6.75
100 W HFS 24 2.50 3.1.0
• 7.50 W E�S 24 3.55 4.54
55 W LPS AN 1.04 1.25
90 W LPS AN 1.65 2.Q5
135 W LPS AN 2.25 2.85
180 W LPS AN 2,80 " 3.55
.. I�20$ OVERi�D '
I.75 W MV 5.25 6.30
254 W MV 6.10 7.40
4q0 W MV 8.65 10.50
100 W HPS 4,34 5.05
�• � 150 W HP5 4»90 5.85
2S0 W HPS 7.00 8.45
KY000 qRi�II�,I�ENTAL - METERID ENERGY ONLY
Cnstanez Charge $4.25 $5.45
Energy Charqe:(c�nts per kWh) 3.I0 3.7Q •
�
0
�
�
Northern States Power Com�xiny (M) Exhibit (PJZ-1) ,
Electric Utility - State of Minnesota Schedule 5
COMPARISON OF PRFSENT AND PROPOSID RATES Page 15 of 16
' PRESE�IT PROPQSr.'�
,..,, '
SMALL MUNICIPAL PUMPING SERVICE
......___....__----_..,.__..__.._..___..__
Custanes Charge $4.25 $5.45
Energy Charge: (cents per kWh) .
Winter: 4.21 5.63
S�a�ner: 4. 71 6. 43
• E'C�: Winber/S�mIIner - per kWh .339/.336 .000/.000
MUNICIP_a,L FUMPING SERVICE
,._..__.._.._......_......___.._......_
- CANCELLID TO �NERAL SERVICE -
Custaner Charge $16.00 I�,
Demand Charge
Winber: First 100 kW $4.76 I�
Excess kW 4.55 i�
Siu�ner: First 100 kw 6.26 r�
Excess kW 6.05 1�,
Danar�d Voltage Discounts: All FQnT
Pr imary $�.40 I�1
Energy Charge (vents per kWh)
All kWh 2.50 t�
�ergy Voltage Discount: All kWh
p=��y 0.06 t�,
F�,: Winter/Su�¢ner - per- kWh .339/.336 .000/.000
0
�
, f i
Northern States Power Canpany (M� Exhibit (PJZ-l)
Electric Utility - S�ate o:E Minnesata Schedule 5
COMPARISQN OF PRE.a'�ENT AND PROP05� RATES Page 16 oE 16
•• •�•• DI�
EIRE AND CIVZL DEE"EIVSE SIREN SERVIC�
..___...._......r._....__....__......__r......_...._.._
Monthly Minimun Charge: $2.40 $2.75
Rate per month per horsepower
af connected capacity $4.47 $0,54
NICOLLET MALL �NERAL SERVICE (CITY OE MINISEA�,PC)LIS }
Manthly Minimum Charge: " $2.40 55.45
Ene�gy Charge {cents per k't�7ii)
All kWh �
4.7I. 5.69
E'c�: Win�er/Su�nner - per kWh .339J.336 ,000/.000
EXCESS ENIIZGY - ST. ANTHONY FALLS LOC:CS AND DAM
Denarx3 Charge:
' per kW o� d�and which is in excess
of the de�nar�ci to be furnish�
without charge $1.25
Energy Charg�: (c�nts per ]�Wh)
per kWh supplied during t% contrac�
yeaz in excess of the annual
enezgy constanption to be �urnished
. wi�hou� cha�ge �
FC�'�,: wint�rJs�a�ner - p�r kwh
$2.25
1.00 1.9p
.�00/.000
.
STANDBY aERVICE RIDER
Custaner Chazge I�, $Z.00
Dana,r�d Charge: per �Month per kW af
Con�zac�ed Standby Capacity
Secor�d ary Vol tage Serv ice t�1
Przmary Voltage Sezvice � t�i
Transnission Transformed Voltage Service t�,
Transnissi�n Valtage 5ervice I�
$1. 95 .
l. 60 •
1.10
Q. 65
�
TANDEM/TCF, CASE NUMBER 85-23, 23 August 1985 Page 3
It would appear that a possible point of principal access
could be arranged opposite Montgomery Drive at the north
boundary of the plat near the Center. This provides
access to an area of high land that may be considered
usable access by the general public directly off of
� Hubert Drive at a more appropriate location to serve the
Dodge Nature Center facility.
C. Trail System.
The explanatory text submitted with the application by
the Developers makes reference to a proposed trail system
as indicated in "Figure 5". Fi�ure 5 and other figures
referred to in the Report are not attached in the copy
submitted to the staff for review. We have called the
Developers in an attempt to clarify this situation and
will try to get more information from the Developers on
this point prior to the Planning Commission Hearing.
Though we have discussed a need for consideration of a
trail system within the proposed development with the
applicant, no definitive drawings have been reviewed or
discussed. Delineation of such a system is such an
important element of the development proposal,
particularly if there is to be no public park dedicated
for neighborhood playground purposes.
2. You will note from the review of the preliminary plat that
the average lot size is 17,773 square feet, but some of the
lots have frontage less than 100 feet as required in the R-1
zone. In view of the overall density, we suggest this is
not particularly crucial and may not even result in smaller
homes being constructed. You will recall that the smaller
lot sizes (10,000_square feet) replatted in a portion of
Friendly Hills several years ago did not result in
particularly smaller homes. Most of the lots in this
rolling and well-ponded area are very desirable, and
provision for some smaller homesites will provide for some
diversity in ultimate occupancy. Approval of the smaller
sites can be handled as a planned unit development approval
or as variances to the individual lots under the platting
regulations. Depending upon the outcome for a requirement
for additional park dedication, a portion of the southerly
part of the plat may be considered for the inclusion of some
townhouse units. This compensation for density could
aceommodate more land for park dedication and, as the
Developer suggests, could be negotiated. Thus, handling the
total development as a planned unit development has some
merit.
S3• Representatives of�the Tandum Corporation have informed us
that a recent meeting was held with nei�hbors to the
proposed development. They suggest a general level of
acceptance on the part of the nei�hbors. Hopefully, it will
be reviewed and expanded on by neighbors at the Public
DEM CF, 85-23, 23 August 1985 Page 4
Hearing. The applicant's principal coneern, at this time,
is acceptance of Phase I of the plat so that initial
construction for streets and utilities can be started this
fall. Thus, the Planning Commission and Council may wish to
consider general acceptance of the Preliminary Plat, Land
` Use Change, PUD, and Rezoning concept�form with definitive
action on Phase I only. This may allow time for the Park
Board review and settling of the park's dedication question
prior to final acceptance of the southerly portion of the
development.
�. Any approvals may be subject to final solution to the
concerns outlined and final engineering details. City
Engineering Staff will prepare preliminary plans for public
roads and utilities eonstruction. Hence, construction this
fall would include only the Phase I area whieh consists of
approximately the northerly third of the development as
submitted.
5. The Developers have just informed us that copies of the
exhibits indicating the trail system were deleted from the
initial reports submitted to the City. Application material
sent to the Planning Commission and Council will include
these exhibits, though we have not seen them as yet.
�
' k.
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
27 August 1985
85-23
Tandem Corporation and TCF
Development Corporation
Principally East and South
of Hubert Drive, West of
Delaware Avenue
Approval of Rezoning from
R-R to R-1, Conditional
Use Permit for PUD, and
Subdivision Approval
1. The property consists of 137.53 gross acres, which 32.19
acres are ponding areas. The proposal is to develop a
single family area consisting of 181 lots, for which the
average lot area would be 17,773 square feet.
The Comprehensive Land Use Plan indicates the property as
rural residential, and the land is zoned R-1A which requires
�0,000 square feet per lot. Thus, consideration of the
proposed development involves an amendment to the Land Use
Plan and a rezoning of the property to R-1 (15,000 square
foot minimum lot size).
As you know, the property in question is part of the
over-all Southeast Area Study currently under review by the
City Planning Commission and Council. In each of the
Scenarios indicating a series of alternative land use
density projection, the area of land in question has been
shown as suggested maximum density of 1.6 units per acre
gross density. The development proposes that 1.32 units per
acre of net density, exclusive of public streets, is at 1.51
units per acre. Thus the density of the proposed
development is within the guidelines suggested in the
Scenarios of the Study. Attached are drawings submitted by
the applicant and a rather complete, explanatory text
deseribing develop objectives, planning, and deseription of
the proposal. We have reviewed preliminary and alternative
plans for the site with the developer on several occasions
and are in general agreement with the development pattern as
proposed. We have some concerns, however, in several
specific areas:
�
TANDEM/TCF, CASE NUMBER 85-23, 23 August 1985
A. Public Parks.
Page 2
The Comprehensive Plan indicates the area proposed for a
public park on the preliminary plat submitted between the
ponds easterly�of the alignment of Decorah Lane. The
Comprehensive Plan, however, also recommends provision
for a neighborhood playground facility in an area
approximating the center of the site. The plat does not
make provision for such a neighborhood playground, and we
are concerned about providing facilities for the new
neighborhood children and adults for active recreation.
An alternative, as suggested in our Southeast Area
Planning Studies, was to combine the two playgrounds
shown in the southeasterly part of the City into a single
neighborhood park which could be located on or near the
south boundary of the Tandem Development proposal.
We feel this is a very impor
as once the land is pl�
playground in the future wi
is in the process of hir
consultant to work with t
recreational needs in this �
criteria that we have used �
the past is that each
approximate three-eighths i
facility to serve immediat
nearest playground facility
end of Friendly Hills,
overloaded if no additiona]
provided in the southeaster:
in any given community �
adequacy of provisions
facilities. To date, the
providing for such facilit
growth. The provision for
Dlav field facilities on thE
tant consideration in as much
tted the development of a
11 be impractical. The City
ing a parks and recreation
ze Park Board to study the
art of the City. The general
n the planning of the City in
site should be within an
iile radius to a playground
e neighborhood needs. The
is the park in the easterly
which we sug�est will be
neighborhood facilities are
y area. The._quality of life
s greatly effected _ by the
for parks .and recreation
Community has done well in
ies in areas of development
:he two large-scale community
Walker nropertv to the north
and the school board property to the south-will, in our
opinion, provide a much needed community-wide play field
facilities. However, it is questionable whether or not
these large-scale parks will adequately serve in terms of
convenience or accessibility the new neighborhoods
projeeted for the southeast area in the contemplated land
use density patterns.
B. Dodge Nature Center Access.
The preliminary plat indicates a cul-de-sae to be
projected at the northwest corner of the plat. The
location and form of this access should be carefully
considered with the Dodge Nature Center people prior to
plan approval. It would° appear that this aceess may not
be an appropriate principal access to the Nature Center,
though vehicular access for other purposes at this point
may be desirable.
�
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
27 August 1985
85-23
Tandem Corporation and TCF
Development Corporation
Principally East and South
of Hubert Drive, West of
Delaware Avenue
Approval of Rezoning from
R-R to R-1, Conditional
Use Permit for PUD, and
Subdivision Approval
1. The property consists of 137.53 gross acres, which 32.19
acres are ponding areas. The proposal is to develop a
single family area consisting of 181 lots, for which the
average lot area would be 17,773 square feet.
The Comprehensive �Land Use Plan indicates the property as
rural residential, and the land is zoned R-1A which requires
40,000 square feet per lot. Thus, consideration of the
proposed development involves an amendment to the Land Use
Plan and a rezoning of the property to R-1 (15,000 square
foot minimum lot size).
As you know, the property in question is part of the
over-all Southeast Area Study currently under review by the
City Planning Commission and Council. In each of the
Scenarios indicating a series of alternative land use
density projection, the area of land in question has been
shown as suggested maximum density of 1.6 'units per acre
gross density. The development proposes that 1.32 units per
acre of net density, exclusive of publie streets, is at 1.51
units per acre. Thus the density of the proposed
development is within the guidelines suggested in the
Scenarios of the Study. Attached are drawings submitted by
the applicant and a rather complete, explanatory text
deseribing develop objectives, planning, and description of
the proposal. We have reviewed preliminary and alternative
plans for the site with the developer on several occasions
and are in general agreement with the development pattern as
proposed. We have some concerns, however, in several
specific areas:
�
'"�
�
TANDEM/TCF,�CASE�-NUMBER 85-23, 23 August 1985
A. Public Parks.
P�a g e 2
The Comprehensive Plan indicates the area proposed for a
public park on the preliminary plat submitted between the
ponds easterly of the alignment of Decorah Lane. The
Comprehensive Plan, however, also recommends provision
for a neighborhood playground facility in an area
approximating the center of the site. The plat does not
make provision for such a neighborhood playground, and we
are concerned about providing facilities for the new
neighborhood children and adults for active recreation.
An alternative, as suggested in our Southeast Area
Planning Studies, was to combine the two- playgrounds
shown in the southeasterly part of the City into a single
neighborhood park which could be located on or near the
south boundary of the Tandem Development proposal.
We feel this is a very impoz
as once the land is pl�
playground in the future wi
is in the process of hir
consultant to work with t
recreational needs in this F
criteria that we have used �
the past is that each
approximate three-eighth�s i
facility to serve immediat
nearest playground facility
end of Friendly Hills,
overloaded if no additiona]
provided in the southeaster:
in any given community i
adequacy of provisions
facilities. To date, the
providing for such facilit
growth. The provision�for
Dlav field facilities on the
tant consideration in as much
tted the development of a
Ll be impractical. The City
ing a parks and recreation
ze Park Board to study the
art of the City. The general
n the planning of the City in
site should be within an
iile radius to a playground
e neighborhood needs. The
is the park in the easterly
which we suggest will be
neighborhood facilities are
y area. The quality of •-life
s greatly effected by the
for parks .and recreation
Community has done well in
Les in areas of development
;he two large-scale community
Walker propertv to the riorth
and the school board property to the south will, in our
opinion, provide a much needed community-wide play field
facilities. However, it is questionable whether or not
these large-scale parks will adequately serve in terms of
convenience or accessibility the new neighborhoods
projected for the southeast area in the contemplated land
use density patterns.
B. Dodge Nature Center Access.
The preliminary plat indicates a cul-de-sac to be
projected at the northwest corner of the plat. The
location and form of this access should be carefully
considered with the Dodge Nature Center people prior to
plan approval. It would appear that-°��his access may not
be an appropriate principal access to the Nature Center,
though vehicular aceess for other purposes at this point
may be desirable.
TANDEM/TCF, CASE NUMBER 85-23,'23 August 1985 Page 3
It would appear that a�possible point of principal access
could be arranged opposite Montgomery Drive at the north
boundary of the plat-near the Center. •This provides
access to an area of high land that may be considered
usable aecess by .the general public direetly off of
Hubert Drive at a more appropriate location to serve the
Dodge Nature Center faeility.
C. Trail System.
The explanatory text �submitted with the application by
the Developers makes reference to a proposed trail system
as indicated in "Figure 5". Figure 5 and other figures
referred to in the Report are not attached in the copy
submitted to the staff for review. We have called the
Developers in an attempt to clarify this situation and
will try to get more information from the Developers on
this point prior to the Planning Commission Hearing.
Though we have discussed a need for consideration of a
trail system within the proposed development with the
applieant, no definitive drawings have been reviewed or
discussed. Delineation of such a system is such an
important element of the development proposal,
particularly if there is to be no public park dedicated
for neighborhood playground purposes.
2. You will note from the review of the preliminary plat that
the average lot size is 1=7,773 square feet, but some of the
lots have frontage less than 100 feet as required in the R-1
zone. In view of the overall density, we suggest this is
not particularly crucial and may not even result in smaller
homes being constructed. You will recall that the smaller
lot sizes (10,000 square= feet) replatted in a portion of
Friendly Hills several years ago did not result in
particularly smaller homes. Most of the lots in this
rolling and well-ponded area are very desirable, and
provision for some smaller homesites will provide for some
diversity in ultimate occupancy. Approval of the smaller
sites can be handled as a� planned unit development approval
or as variances to the individual lots under the platting
regulations. Depending upon the outcome for a requirement
for additional park dedication, a portion of the southerly
part of the plat may be considered for the inclusion of some
townhouse units. This compensation for density could
accommodate more land f`or park dedication and, as the
Developer•suggests, could be negotiated. Thus, handling the
total development as a planned unit development has some
merit.
3. Representatives of the Tandum Corporation have informed us
that a recent meeting was held with neighbors to the
proposed development. They sug�est a general level of
acc�eptance on the part of the neighbors. Hopefully, it will
be reviewed and expanded on by neighbors at the Public
�
�
;,
TANDEM/TC�', CASE NUMBER 85-23, 23 Augusfi 1985 Page 4
Hearing. The appli�cant's prineipal concern, at this time,
is aceeptanee of Phase T of the plat so that initial
construction for st�eets and utilities can be started this
fall. Thus, the Plannfng Commission and Cauncil may wish to
cons9.der general. aecep�ance oi the Preliminary P1at, Land
Use Change, PUD, and Rezoning eoncept form with definitive
action on Phase I only. This may allow time for the Park
Boarfl review and ss�tling of the park's dedication questian
prior to final aeeeptance of the souther�ly portzon of the
development.
4. Any approvals may �be subject ta final solution to the
eoneerns autlined and final enga.neering details. City
Engineering Staff wa:�ll prepare prel.iminary plans t'or public
raads and utilities construetion. Henee, construetion this
fall would include anly the Phase I area which cansists of
approximately the northerly third of the deve].opment as
submitted.
5. The Deve3opers have just i.nfarmed us that eopies of �he
exhibits indicating the trail system were deleted fram the
initial reports submitted to the City. Applieation material
sent to the Planning Commissi.on and Council will a.nclude
these exhibits, though we have not seen them as yet.
�
<
- N � 'I ' :`s;i' •'-x::�Pi;r' i � I !. .� .' � � �,�.
� ��'i �`y���,�,';,", ���' •� ' l � i 1 �
a„�� ' y". �• � % i � �
S,4• 1.�,� f�
1 i ` y � '��C, - v
• � � y{ ,nt"S ` �'- -�'-_' ="" ` ' . � r� I.
: / , .'�i�'.� � . . �� I � . - . - -- "'� .
� ■ �`_c�' I �,��"��r T`�, - � ,, • y ' • '
�� - � . �T�---- �; �.- •-•----�-- - .._ ._..__ , - .i _.__�� r _. .1___.r' �_ � �'� _.�\ .....
• • '�^��.�h'3�^ � I � 4, v� rf _� '"� ��j � , � '' � �
� ' ' , s A. ��� I 1 " j �, _� / � % � \ s
�_ , ;�� �;
. � �. .y •, l�,�:,, � I �j \ I �., ; j � , � �'n ---r^--�--- H
� • w''i'�` '�� � ' _ � I � , .
I • _ .p,Y.r�,r;� 1 \ � , r_ � � • C
�: � r ••,�',�%`� �. I \ �� ------ - ,�_'3--� --- �-- I - '-��!1 - -- �_ � ,
� .�;' � �' , -i- -t- � ��__ (tn
/ I ' � r� 1
•� ' I '
I �
I 1 I 1 �
} •. �' ' ` ;� �# ' � ' ' ' .
< • -;�Ye� i � ' •o I � ' I '
� �
�• 1 1 N � 1 �� ►OWfR CO .� fASEYFMI � _
- _ _' • • • � . y. �� _'" �I� ��
2• • ' "�''.ti \ � � � •
.ori,;?'• y r � 3,fi}EN Y • MARSH t � ! '
� ' ':y'y^'". • 1 �1 ; � ' ! ,
. ; �i+,;;���s:�, . �`�� , ��� PARK � I
_ ��;y3%:`..'�j •' " • \ . .._i.. .--'-..1�-L ..• 1• .
S' ' �'\ � . •__ •
;,�`'' 6r�'� • 1 �f� � , � \ � i�
J ' is .es' _ )•. *-__ �� �.
s:�, � � • �
t--+. 'iG� R y • r `f • , � ��4�1�� � � � � � •
4 1 ' �� • �•y �/� �� � �� _`� �-
~• •. r.. •..�• �� • . � ���'�- /��'__ -- .
�..'j ?t,X'.�„"'. - • f I � � J`� i�� � _ / �r'� ��=� �. • '�� �
• 1.�89 � � /• � _- � � �
y � . � � �',�. \ __{
; �. � � : • S' ~ � � /� — _ -ri .
s � "� • — •'1 �1 � • � • > � � ' -- —= r7 I . �. /
�^�J � -- -- -i-� � . • qy • • _ .. a � / - -_ � � ` /.,O
/"�/ •__ _ ' • ,/� •/•I �/ � / . / � � � is� % i/
� +;�� . n . K; .`:..', • , .y. _ �� � i UBJECT PROPER�'aY. s,����
� � Eµ /
� • • •�' � � - � � -
�r�'.:�„I : a : �.� - %• - — -- � S CALE-1 " 00. � -�;�
'°' ` � ' i � y �'r � � i — --� , _ , ,t,
F • . „ a � j _ �. - ti--- -._ _
� • . � � . � 3 {� � y \ �= .' �--- _ - � .
• r' � i � <,� \ <_ . .� /� �_'__` ���
�' { } �` `J1� • • m �� � _ �
. I •�� � ��� Q't � - -- �• .
� �t--� . � •��- �-�
' , �.i• r-r--._. 4.�__,� - -i NORTH - �, c�.. ��
� I ' f '�' ' _ J i�. •`� � •�.'s�
� • _. ' � -- �
� �( • A PA�/" � •
� � �_� i �' i � •_� _ G_� % _ - ``�=" .
i • i i -
�'; •
� �B.WWHED ' ' _ � ,� � .
wtc� � � r
WELL y �'
• - o+ � • t
,i• �4� .i /` ` - '.
- 14 ' ' - .
�� .. .— - � ' • ,
r �j .
•��_ -. _._ .._�... __�_ �..����._"_�. � . _ '�_.�.. - .
♦: \ �
_�- \�� 1� .
!i?YYCO w�' a�.
l� 3 ,, � � ' � `a ..
Fy•�'� -
��.. O � r�
� ,.�.. �.�°'" - \ .�o = - - j ': � � _ . _
� __, .
'� �� � , � !� _ . � _ � ,�
�i ( . :
�� � � az • �...� � � : �
�`__�~ y� u - � ,`'n ; h �,:_ _
`� 1 �y �. ��._ j� V _ _ ��
'� ` � ti6t�� 9' --- ' � l'r\ � ��� _� : . -
� �\ '.
�i� � ^ �.�_-- .�� �: ' .
� � — •- �� •:
. �;� i�". •
� -� ---. – –' .
— : . : - :: -i.:::_ a:; . �; � _ _ {�y�. . —
. �- . ': ::+,:,,; • , :�t :: �r: _ �:�'.. � ��. , ,,�` -- __
.. . -��... •i. � . .. .'��•' • . • . • .. :'�;�/:, , . . M' .. # `�—�
� ._ •a . � _ - \
� , , ' , �• . . •i - - • � `\� �'�
(f i ' : . � ., ,. . , , ' ' � \ • ' .�\\� .
= ���-. � � � . . . � � � � ` ►
'� �'•; ,� � ;�:`:�.< s•��` � .� i •� % ; I ��
� t' ,
� i`� , � �.;;�.,��,: `. • , � ;
r � � O
, . �?; �:;,�r ,r;� t� �i + I
:. 1 ��� � - r '
� '� ' ��d �•,y � _ '" �_ ` � ' •' .�-.- -- - - � 'J,
~ ' ''ro?jA,d3i�4,�n,s� ..`, � � `� /-� " "
A � I .■ �C�--__I'�:�!•.'£� `,` _..__.."" ' '�__' I __"" .�__ !' ,\�. ` ,/_ JI � , _• .. •
� � j=� ;v'��`�.�.`% �- — - � __ -•T-- --� r ���'��-� Y � — i �'-
�'c � I i '� \ � ��� �� `�
`__"•. � i,� •���' � I " �` I � ��� % , \ •/ ; • ..i.
.�� : t��''� � _ � •
� f� � l • 1; li;,. � � i \ �`` �. �/ �� ~\ N
�7 '���;. � s 'T'
� _ �.__ _ ,��;'� I � � ` - � '' • I �C
~�� � j : . >,;;�4:s` � , i ``� � � - � ` � �
� '"�`' � ' --------- ¢ --- -- -�—�y —--- — �
. .}: • a.' \ � ; � -t t . � � ' ' '.. �I �
�` � � �l
:•-' ' • ! 1 , t � ,I •
� i � i
Y � � ' � i ' �
� •:���' I 6 ° I � ; I �
I�: � X I . .
�- __ IOM'LR CO _!„ l�5[YtMf � �.�
� Y•—�-�--..� ,+`'•
� o�a'.#'!< N Y • MARSM r _ .� —
�� _ �Rt ..r ( �� g ' � • ; � �
_ � ��°:V �• � ._y�� PARK � .�-- --1�-1- : I• .
t' • `t . • � �
_' �e •\ i � . •=5 �
_ Cz� • "3u4 5i . • • �
� . ': •' v;� \ � � �. �'
��r;�5 _ �., �•' •/ ?'-- `.
a✓��;r;�ia";� .!
�- [:a :.., - . � '• � ; `� "�.� � ^ /i , a , .
1 �'�' r. •''• �i. /•�.�• � � ' � / - _ `�/ - %/ /�=:� � _. _-• ' v .
� r , n" =-i � \ - -=--_) - • `'
.. :<r' � - - ;, ��% � � � ' � i� � - =- � -- �-- � .
�� . •-- ,. \ 1.. =—�-! .
, � t. r- .-1•- / -!
�� �: - � ' � �• . > ; � -- = �y '."
� � +`� �', . • \' . � 4ti . ' _ ' . � � i � .' �. � a
�� — ' — I s
% «:- � _ _ti ; � i ' ��`y � ' � � ' i�= �, � �� � ��' w
!�' • � , • K . • • •,' - •• `- � �. UBJECT PROPER.�'�.V..- I S,�.E� ���
.
�,r A< I • • i • � ' . / � � I - . � � �. . .
�� = . a : . �}� � -_--� __ ; S CALE-1 " 00. � � �� �r
� ` r � i, \� J.'r�' i --- � -=— -_- ,.,
,� 4/�. _t• �� ' ! `----'..- / .
� �l •� � ' . • '' • +`'� � � i� ,�'�`�L_ .. '_ - � / ?� --`� =- •-`1 • � .
'r. • If. `�' . ;, • �.�°'Qr4 ` ._.� � • m �� � _=� •
• �•, �� � � �t'---• - � '•�. r` -
. J ' T�r �.r:J_,� -.. _ ��: �'��
', , i 1f_ 'Y ; � � i. �. : • � �^ ' � NORTH '�-. � � �=�
\( • APA�i \ \ ' J
_ � j ��� `� �. _ ��'�
I_� , �_�. - - �� .- .-
� ' nennoor+eo � -•- ° � .
W2[l T. , WELL y � � � . .
.� p�,y � �'1 r' � � '+ � _
• _ � �1 . .
4
.f �i`�\ .�....-�. _�___ ..._���.�.�� � �.�.� . " � •
� .
__- �;� 11 .
.�..y.. T .LjV.YA'.:•&15iin Y�IJ.,'YI'./.{i '
� _ .r��15 �`'�' � � , � � _ — , • _
' Y \ •0•4o�i - _ _' ' , . tl I. � �
- � o . _ - _ _ . _-) • __ _
' „ � '': /' _ � '
. �� � ( �
, � � ' , ,�
;I � � �y • r�� -�� � �.: ��--
� � � /i� ' � u � �,\� `��I � ' � ' ��'
�� \I��I +�c�¢%� � __- ' f �� ���\`; _ _u'. . .
IF� . /�� ��— _•`_ ��,.
� -J �Vf
. _
.�r' :'a ', .
� - -�L .
-- : _ ,.:: .L:: ;�: . _ .{�y.; - . -
;. ' ;;- ,. � ;:• _ . _,'. .� . ,. � ' --_�
�I � .. -!= � . .. •''��' • . ' . �'���` . . . ��^ ���;
� ,- ..I.. , _� . . • • • � „\
"" ' c�j� � ' - `\�
.i` � • , i _- ' �\_ , I . \\\ , ,
_-� � i �'. . • .. . � � ' i \
aiErto �
DATE; August 27, 1985
T0: ;tavor, City Council and City Adm s�tbr
FROM: Paul R. Berg
Code £nforcement Officer
SUBJEGT: Building Activity Report far AUgUS�, 1985
CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE - 1985
N0. VALUATION FEE COLLECTED N0. VALUATION
BLDG PERMITS �
sF� 8 1,000,127.86 6,537.31 39 4,759,118,30
�r p 0 0 0 0
C11 3 I26,450.00 933.9I 29 6,4�5,778.00
Mzsc. 13 103,246.16 1,2Q9.p7 83 328,457.21
sU$ TOTAL 24 1,229,824.02 8,680.29 151 11,533,353.51
TRADE PERMITS
P1bg 8 193.00 49
wtr 3 I5.00 37
swr 3 52.,50 31
xrg, Ac,
Gas Pipe 14 903.50 59
Su8 TOTAL 28 1,164.00 176
LICENSI�G
Cantractor's
Licenses 3� $75,00 260
FEE COLLECTED
31,331.07
a
30,165.99
8,154,38
69,651.44
1,231.OQ
12,682.50
542,50
4,104.Q0
1$,560.q0
TOTAL 87 $1,229,824.02 $10,719.29 � 587 $11,533,353.51 $94,711.44
,
YEAR TO DATE — 19$!�
N0. VALUATION FEE COLLEC:'c
37 4,0$9,1'89.05 28,465.84
3 6,750,OQQ.QO 28,749.60
40 2,�4�9,838.00 16,276.75
99 2,663,286.19 17,734.78
179 16,152,313.24 91,226,97
64
41
40
80
225
3,625.Q0
2�5.00
700.00
8,977.50
13,507.50
7 , 000 . QO
684 $1.6,152,313.24 $111,734.47
NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac and State Surcharge. Arnounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee a-
valuatian amounts.
.,� '
n „ ,
�.� ' . ,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 27, 1985
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. Fraz ��dministrator
SUBJECT: Citizen's Request Concerning Level of Roger's Lake
Attached is a letter from an anonymous citizen�questioning why the
level of Roger's Lake was dropped and asking that Council consider raising
it once again.
The lake was lowered in 1972 for the following reasons:
a. Four or more basements below lake level.
� b. Sanitary Sewer up to 13' below lake.
c. Mendakota Country Club closed 7/7/71 due to flooding.
� d. Wagon Wheel Trail in danger of flooding. �
� _e. Emergency pumping needed�twice prior to project to lower lake. _
The City originally proposed�an elevation of 873, but the DNR later
set 872.2 at the "ordinary high water level" and the Council adopted that
figure as target elevat.ion.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Convey to the "concerned citizen" the reasons for the�.�:or�ginal decision
. to lower the lake elevation and that�Council sees no basis to reconsider
that action at this time.
2. Refer the issue to.the Engineering Siaff for a more in-depth study
of alternatives to the current elevation. The cost of such a_study
would have to be charged to the General Fund, and the Engineering
.. : Staff could not likely get to it for a few months:
�'. RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1.
- KDF':.kkh
attachment
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
27 August 1985
85-24
Yorkton Ltd.
Southwesterly Corner of
Trunk Highway 110 and
Lexington Avenue (see
sketch)
Approval of Preliminary
Plat and Rezoning from R-1
to B-lA
1. The applicant has submitted a drawing illustrating the
division of the land into six lots and one outlot. No
additional drawings or explanatory text, however, have been
submitted, and thus it will be difficult for the Planning
Commission and Council to evaluate the proposal.
We have meet with the developer on several occasions
regarding the development of this property. He proposes to
develop the convention center near the southwesterly portion
of the site. Preliminary plans for this facility have been
reviewed, though no such plans have been submitted with the
platting proposal. Preliminary grading plans should be
submitted along with preliminary plans for the initial
structure. Type, scale, and ultimate uses of the remainder
of the land should also be indicated as a basis for
consideration of the rezoning and the routing of the public
street facility proposed.
Rezoning is involved because the major portion of the land,
initially zoned B-1A under the original comprehensive plan
was that which was northerly of the• Resurrection Cemetery
property. The current proposal involves the acquisition of
a strip of land along the south side of the proposed roadway
(see attached exhibit), whieh is now zoned R-1, the zone
which applies to the remainder of the Resurrection Cemetery
land.
A public hearing has been published for this platting and
rezoning application. Due to the �lack of information
submitted, however, we suggest that the Planning Commission
and Council consider adjourning the public hearing to a
subsequent meeting so as to allow for appropriate review of
the initial and projected land use proposal.
A��
�
�
�:��
�:$..
1 LiaL�l�ll\�/ •�u� va�a
DATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
27 August 1985
85-26
Ray A.� MeLevish
North Side of Miriam
Street (see sketch)
Approval of Variance to
Minimum Lot Size
1. Mr. MeLevish proposed to build a home on a sixty foot lot on
the north side of Miriam Street. Attaehed is a copy of the
site plan indicating a proposed location of the home and its
setback relevant to the side lot and front lot lines. You
will notice that the home will conform to the required ten
foot setback on the sides and will be forty feet back from
the front property line. _
� �
The City Zoning Ordinanee states that as of the time of the
adoption of the "new ordinanee" in 1962, any lot that meets
70 percent of the new lot size requirements is deemed a
buildable lot. The minimum lot size is, of course, 100 feet
. of frontage with a land area of 15,000 square fee.t. The lot
proposed has 60 feet•of frontage.and a land area of 10,698
square feet, which does not �meet' the minimum of 70 percent
requirement. • _, � -
Thus, applicants �a`re 'seeking' a variance on the minimum lot
size provisions�"so as to construct a new,_single family home
on the lot. ,. Therer are, as you know, a considerable._ number
of 60 foot= 1'ots in the northerly portion �of the City. Some
of these have be'en built.on utilizing a lot;and a half,.two
lots, and,- .in many cases, a single 60 foot ' lot. -, There •� are
such ,existing='`50'�foot lots in ..the immediate��area:��j:';.The .basic,�:_;,
. •purpose of �. requiring` a� varianee for � lo't's���':; less` :$than.��`�.70 � `
• pereent of� the• -requirement is to make sure �:=.;that we . do .,not;
.have an ., isolated;` �.very small lot among larger::, properties.�
::This would ��not ��appear to be the case here;, and,��' as.. in _•.the �
past,�the�City_may wish to consider approval of..the variance �•-
,. �� OYl th'at �bas'is�.� �rr: � `'. .;s:Yr..��_..:,.r�.,««,<.._...r��..�a<.,..r..+�1�d r.+- �a "�,�t�..- T �; � yi..t�.�-. "�:
'.tis'��s" �'�y ' `' b�`'�i' {� e:',�`y.'�"'d j' s },.. ���:
, .. -�-' ...:Y'.� .A ;i.c.�$'�3t..".�._�,�i, ^r_'�`�'-.:' : "e:.; � � 3,.:E43'.4:.:?x= 3•4ic'
. .Pr.n.,. ww:s+.c.t��'9�LtC�l° .:1c �'i.� � "4 ��' h-+�a�' .c.������ � _ .
SUBJECT PROPERTY - � � -""-
� _ _ _ _ �CALE-�"-800' NOR�'H ; � � . �
. :.;;�: • ;,: ... .... .. : :{:..�:;.
- _= P,��I � � �������_ _ ._1- _ � _ :��: �:�� �.
-_. �_ s._
�
'� � ��—_ _�'% '
r . � - -L,� _ _ , :; - !
� - -
i ��' —: ' f. _ = i
� �-_ _
_� T . J•
�..-
L � `
�
�
�
�
�
IA.'
��Hc-. y(voP# �^/c.t��—.
Ml���t'?
t�
'' "Yix My% hmP �
L� N V�cn �
. t'� �f..l"'i� i H �
ST,
, ��
�a
` _..�M1
E__.-�-.,- - --- -- — t�iG�' �"x,ficK fivr'f'� t�
/f I • t�.Iv�wn�7'
-- �?�i�t GLl�e* ��.i"�a
�
Page No. 2330
August 27, 1985
CITY Or MENDUTA HGIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESUTA
Minutes of the Joint Meeting
Neld Tuesday, August 27, 1985
C Pursuant to due call and notice thereof. the special meeting of the Mendota
Heights City Council was held at 7:00 P.M., at the City Hall, 750 South Plaza
Drive. Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:08 P.M. The followin�
members were present: Mayor Lockwood, Councilmembers Cummins, Hartmann, and
Witt. Councilmember Blesener had advised the Council that she would be unable
to attend. Also present were Planning Commission members Kruse, Burke, Frank,
Henning, McMonigal, Morson, and Stefani.
AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of the agenda as
prepared.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT Mayor Lockwood moved the adoption of Resolution No.85-63A,
WITH EAGAN "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION'OF A JOINT POWER��
AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA".
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. �
Ayes: 4 .
Nays: 0
SOUTH EAST AREA STUDY City Planner Howard Dahlgren gave a brief history of the plan-
ning for the South East Area of the City. He indicated that
some of the major landowners were now requesting rezoning of
the land contiguous to I-494.
He then presented an updated analysis of the traffic that
would be generated by the alternate development schemes and
the ability of the area transportation system to handle
that traffic. Planner Dahlgren indicated that the system
should be adequate, with the possible exception of the Dodd
Road/Mendota Heights Road intersection, for some of the more
intense development schemes might necessitate development
of left turn lanes and perhaps even traffic control signals
at some point in the future. He said that the studies by
traffic engineer Jack Anderson indicated that approximately
45% of the trips generated by the new development would be
oriented to the Dodd/I-494 interchange.
Mr. Dahlgren said that his firm had developed two new concepts
since the preliminary report, labeled as concept B-1 and
B-2. Under concept B-1, there would be limited office use
in the property south of the Visitation Convent and St.
Thomas Academy. Low density residential would be the
designation for the school district property immediately
south of the Hazel Court development. For the property
south of Mendota Heights Road, it would be high density
Page No. 2331
August 27, 1985
residential toward the west, and medium density residentiay
(i.e., 4 units per acre) on the easterly portion.
Planner Dahlgren said that the Visitation sisters preferred
the office designation for their land, �nd that such a use
was also more compatible with airport noise guidelines. He
added that the owner of the three single family homes on
Condon Court also agreed with that designation so it appeared
that there was little controversy on this part of the proposal.
Under Concept B-2, the property immediately south of Hazel
Court would be upgraded to medium density residential (i.e,
4 units per acre), and there would be planned a 35,000 square
foot neighborhood commercial facility at the southeast
corner of Mendota Heights Road and Dodd Road. Concept B-1
also extends the medium density residential somewhat north
of Mendota Heights Road on the easterly part of the property.
Planner Dahlgren then briefly explained parts of the
updated study that covered daily auto trip generations from
different kinds of development, concerns with the groundwater,
and the fiscal impacts on the City's tax base of the various
alternate developments. He said that there were no unusual
groundwater concerns in this area, but any development plan
should be sensitive to the need to protect the recharge
areas. With regard to taxes, he indicated that the studiea
done by the consultant and city staff showed that the net tax
benefit to the City went up with increased density, and was
highest for Concept D, which maximizes apartment use.
Planner Dahlgren said that he felt the part of the project
dealing with the Visitation/Tousignant project was not really
controversial, and that the owners and surrounding land
owners seem to agree on the designation. He also indicated that
he thought Tandem Corporation's proposal for average 20,000
square foot lots on the Opus property were generally consistent
with surrounding residential developments in the Friendly
Hills and Delaware Crossing subdivisions.
Mr. Dahlgren said that he thought the real issues were for
the area south of Mendota Heights Road. Because of the
airport noise considerations, as well as the fact that there
would be no noise walls protecting this area from the freeway,
he said that it was his opinion that some form of multi-family
housing appeared most appropriate for this area. He felt that
that should be apartments to the west, and townhouses at 4
units per acre in the more easterly area which would be
protected from the freeway by a sizeable berm.
Developer Jim Riley responded that he felt that townhouses
at 4 units per acre for that area was really not economical"
viable, due to decreased values caused by airport noise and
freeway, as well as anticipated assessments for utilities.
�
Planner Dahlgren said
times the density of
planned for the,a ea,
� r-
1'age No. 2332
August 27, 1985
that 4 units per acre would be three
the McNulty proposal which was once
but did_^�rove to be economically
M�''
Mayor Lockwood asked about the possibility of rezoning all
of the property south of Mendota Heights Road to R-lA,
40,000 square foot lots. He said that he felt people who
rcould afford to build houses on that size of lots could also
afford the soundproof ing necessary to protect their houses
from airport noise. Planner Dahlgren responded that people
who could afford to live in that kind of a house probably
would not choose an area contiguous to a freeway and
heavily impacted by airport noise, as well as the special
expense of noise attenuation. He also said that he felt that
such a development simply would not be economically viable.
Councilmember Cummins questioned the economy of assessments for
the townhouses at 4 units per acre. Planner Dahlgren responded
that that density had proven viable in other parts of the
metropolitan area, and he felt it could work here.
Councilmember Cummins also said that concern had been
expressed to him about the adequacy of the utility system to
handle more dense development than was currently zoned.
Public Works Director Jim Danielson said that he felt the
system really was quite adequate to handle any of the develop-
ment schemes. Mayor Lockwood responded that as he recalled
the City's trunk sewer system had been built to handle an
anticipated population of 20,000.
Councilmember Cummins questio�d whether there might be any
reason to consider extending the office use further to the
east in lieu of the high density residential. Planner
Dahlgren responded that would be possible, but that he felt
the Visitation property to the west was much better suited
for that use, primarily because of the available transportation
system. He said that the transportation system going east
toward Delaware Avenue tends to "peter out" as viable for
office use. He also said that he thought that type of office
use could conflict with the existing residential neighbor-
hoods to the north.
Councilmember Witt asked about the concern that had been
expressed by some ove.r renters versus owners in such large
numbers. Planner Dahlgren responded that in the early 'S0's,
there was a perception that renters would not have a"stake"
in the community, and would not therefore be good residents.
He said that in the ensuing years that had largely been found
to be a myth. He added that renters, if anything, tend to
be disinterested in local affairs, rather than forming any
kind of coordinated voting block that affects local politics.
He said that people who rent in a community frequently also
choose to buy in that same community later, and the recent
t
1'��Ke No. 1'L3� a' ' ' ' -
August 27, 1985
studies of the Itil.ey �partments at Lexington Heights showed
that the rents are quite high, and the type of people livi
there to be similar to other types of people you might find
in Mendota Heights.
Developer Riley said that he had commissioned an appraiser to
do an analysis of alternative land uses on his property
south of Mendot� Heights Road. He said that that preliminary
report would be presented to the Council in the near future,
but it appeared that the combined impact.of the freeway and
airport noise zoning would tend to decrease market values
of properties in the area by 10 to 15%. Therefore, it appeared
that the appraisers opinion would be that owner occupied
housing in the area would only work at 8 to 10 units per acre,
and tfiey would have to be lower cost units. Mr. Riley said
that he felt the City would be much better off with the high-
quality, low density apartment project that he was proposing.
Planner Dahlgren noted that the City of Eagan has designated
about 3,000 acres running south all the way along I-494 for
commercial and industrial development.
Marsha Knittig, Park Commissioner, indicated that the park
commission had requested that any final determination on
setting aside land for parks or park dedication fees from
this development be postponed until the City's master parks
plan is completed later this year.
Planning Commission Chairperson Cam Kruse asked about the
impact of traffic on Dodd Road. Planner Dahlgren responded
that he thought that Dodd Road was going to be more signif-
icantly impacted by the development to the south in Eagan,
than by anything Mendota Heights would do in the southeast
area.
It was agreed that a follow-up special workshop between the
Planning Commission and City Council would be necessary to
start to make some decisions on the various alternatives
presented. That meeting was set for Tuesday, September lOth,
at �.7-�3U P.M. •
7 %� �
ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the City
Council, Councilmember Hartmann moved that the meeting be
adjourned. _
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 8:40 o'clock P.M.
ATTEST:
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
�Kevin D. Frazell, City Administrat�
h ^
�
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
27 Au�ust 1985
85-17
George T. Spangers
Southeast Corner of Marie
Avenue and Walker Avenue
(see sketch)
Approval of Preliminary
Plat
1. This planning proposal was discussed at the last Planning
Commission Meeting and was held over to the August meeting
so as to give time for the developer to consider adjustments
discussed at the July Commission Hearing.
We have suggested that Lots 5 and 6 be combined into a
single lot, and moving the rear lot line so as to be
consistent with the alignment of the creek.which passes
through the overall property. The larger lot thus created
will thus be more in scale with the frontage of the very
large lots that are platted and developed to the south.
The Engineering Staff has also recommended provision for a
drainage easement along the creek bed, which would be a
normal condition for the platting of any property which
includes such a major drainage way.
To our knowledge, no revised plans have been submitted by
the applicant. Thus, we are not aware of whether Mr.
Spangers has or has not seriously considered the points
discussed by the Planning Commission at the previous
meeting.
. ' �'
:=;:
,
�
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
27 August 1985
85-25
Stephen G. Hunter
North of Hunter Lane,
South of Trunk Highway 13
(see sketch)
Approval of Variance to
Height of Single Family
Residence
1. This past year, Mr. Hunter has applied for and received
approval for the development of a single family homesite on
the area of land where he now proposes to construct a new
single family home. The Council has also granted a twenty
foot variance to the forty foot setback requirement above
the river bluff line on the north side of his property.
He has now employed an architect to design a home which the
� Building Inspector informs us is three feet higher than the
�.: � minimum height requirement in the R-1 District. That height
° requirement is two-stories or twenty-five feet, whieh ever
is less.
If the land were zoned R-1A, the height
thirity-five feet or three-stories in height.
the land is zoned R-1, a variance will have
allow for the construction of the home to
feet high as measured at the median height
at the top of the house.
requirement is
In as much as
to be issued to
be twenty-eight
of the hip roof
Mr. Hunter informs us that thou�h his variance was granted
to be twenty feet back from the bluff line, he is in fact
proposing to build a home twenty-six feet back. This may be
a mitigating factor in consideration of the height
requirement.
Mr. Hunter has submitted two elevations.of the proposed
structure which are attached along with the statement
explaining his proposal. We have requested that he submit a
site plan indicating the proposed location of the house,
particularly as it relates to the bluff line in as much as
this is a ma�tter of concern relating to the Critical Area
River Corridor Development Regulations.
HUNTER, CASE NUMBER 85-25, 27 August 1985 Page 2 �
We will encourage Mr. Hunter to bring a site plan to the
meeting so as to aid the Planning Commission and Council in
their evaluation of this proposal.
It appears that the plans which we reviewed with Mr. Hunter
and his wife are well done and will produce a very
attractive home. The site is a very large lot, exceeding
the 40,000 square foot required in an R-1A District. As
noted, the height limitation in this District with these
larger lot sizes is higher, being thirty-five feet rather
than twenty-five feet in the R-1 District. Mr. Hunter can
relate to you his problems with respect to their attempt to
reduce the height of the structure within the twenty-five
foot height limitation. The evaluation on part of the
Planning Commission and Council with respect to these
efforts as compared to the significance of the three foot
additional height can be the basis for a decision.
• • �" %
,"t3. . i
. ,�� __/�' i
�O ,
.'_ _--',..' . ��
. '` /�� G`'`� �e
- . %
_ _ _ ' '_ i' ��� . , .
_ -= - — -'� ::.:_
--�.. _---- - .
' �— .- --_—� j�.R r = ����z� � = , _ ..r� �
-- --- ' -- — — � .� •' I
-- — _ — -- _ -- — — -- — _-= _ _ . �`' % . =:�' � I
_ _ -_' — - ' ' ` '•••• _�,
_- - - ;; •S~ � '�'. -
— _ � . �/� - - r�n'[1D �tj.. -.
� F •
_ '_ '_ __ •: I���
� O — • 1 t^'+ � • • •
� � _ ` �('� :
__ __ N =_ _ �:.: ..`i. �. • , +
- - - =--- --_ � _ _ • ':. � •,;,�:� . ,�
�� �, ...
-��a�=_ = t� _ _ . . , . . . �.
�._.,-__ � �.
�- � - '' •
::<i . . . • 1
' .'�:.' +�`�' -
S � . ,.1� (. � �
_ • + �.,
\ � _- . .;,: •:i:: • .i . .; -
Y ' ' ::� .. '�` .
..•
.: . .
..;: . '
f. ,.' ''� I •� .�'' ; �
-- -- - .
' _ •�- — - � ��:.• � '• o • • • .
, - ARIE V -
_.-T^ • \ '' ml • �
• I' • �
- -�� UBJECT PROPER . :�
�- • . • �
.r�• �% u l� •
- T SCALE-1"-8 ' , _ _ 'N �';, i � . -r
� '�� • N • �waw� . '
( �,�./: �+ � ct C
= NORT ��-.� _ �; , , ;-,
.. — � • • . .
,�.� �~ �~s'1 t�� , /) :`/� :C.;; ••\_� '' � • • E
s : +' '
i^,� , ,,+ �1,�'•. �1�. � — Y[MOOTA El[YEMIIRY _ �
� � ,� � j� � � �•� � �GNOOI I IIMI �CI
��' , ,,�•• ^\ � � \ ( • • `
' `.l- � . ' _. �� _ � _ . . )_,\� 1.•;�!� . . _ '� _ s . )� _ . r
�,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
August 27, 1985 - 7:00 P.M.
1. Call to Order.
2. Roll Call.
3. Agenda Adoption. �
4. Consider adoption of joint powers agreement with City of Eagan for use
of $3,260,000 of IDB entitlement. (Agreement will be handed out Tuesday
evening).
5. Joint meeting with Planning Commission regardina Southeast Area Study.
6. Adjourn.
�
• . M
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
City Hall Citizen's Committee Meeting
Minutes, August 28, 1985
The first meeting of the City Hall Citizen's Committee was held on August
28, 1985. Members present were Chair Stan Gustafson, Evelyn Fischer, Pete Villard,
Jerry Morson, Dave Zemke, Frank Fischer, Barb Eschle, Joyce Ogren, Lou Brenner.
Excused absences were: Sharon Koll, A1 Singer and Bob Doffing. Also present
was City Administrator Kevin Frazell, and architects Bob Pierce and Dick Guilyard.
1. Meeting was called to order by Chair Gustafson at 7:32 P.M.
2. Introductions - everyone introduced themselves, giving their address
and occupations.
3. Purpose of the committee - City Administrator Frazell gave a brief history
of the City Hall issue, indicating that the study had been included in the
1985 budget, and pursuing the possibility of city hall had been a priority
with the City Council. He added that the Council wished to convene a
citizen's committee to study and make recommendations on the issue, because
the City Hall would be a facility that would far outlive any Council or
staff inembers, and there should be broad community input for such a community
facility. They also wanted to insure that there was broad community
support for the project, and it would not be seen as just a Council or staff
project.
Administrator Frazell said that the Council specifically would like for the
committee to look at:
1. Identification of community needs.
2. Review of architects needs assessment.
3. Leasing versus building space for City government.
4. Alternative site analysis.
5. Building design concepts.
6. Financing alternatives.
Administrator Frazell said that should the committee conclude that a bond
referendum would be needed, the committee would be a crucial element in
selling that issue to the public at large.
Chair Gustafson said that he thought the committee's purpose was to consider
two issues, first, what space is needed for the operations of City govern-
ment, and second, are there any other community needs that should be
.' addressed in connection with a city hall facility. He said that he thought
the committee was to act as a conduit for public opinion, and he would
invite any citizen who had comments to channel those through the committee.
� . •
August 28, 1985 City Hall Citizen's Committee Meeting Page Two
4. Review of project objectives - Architect Dick Guilyard said there were
five primary issues that the committee might want to address.
1. Location and access considerations.
2. Community role - i.e., simply an office, community gathering space, etc.
3. Relationship to other development in the City.
4. Relationship to other City facilities.
S. Character/spirit/image for the community, including serving as a
standard for other development.
Mr. Guilyard went on to say that there were basically three parameters for
the project, cost/economics, public understanding and perception of needs, and
public approval.
Bob Pierce then asked the committee to have some discussion about what role
they thought the facility should play in the community. Chair Gustafson responded
that he thought the community lacked public meeting space, other than what may
occasionally be available in the schools. Lou Brenner raised the question of
whether the community also needed a library. It was generally agreed by the
committee that while a library might be desirable, it would really hinge upon a
commitment by Dakota County to operate a library in Mendota Heights. City Admin-
istrator Frazell said he would contact the County prior to the next meeting to
obtain their reaction to such a proposal.
5. Project schedule - It was discussed that the committee should try to
complete most of their work by the end of the year, so that should a
decision be made to build, there would be time for a referendum ,(if
necessary), and to plan and construct a facility in time for occupation
when the City's existing lease expires in August of 1987.
6. Preliminary review of space needs - Bob Pierce handed out the preliminary
space allocations that had been developed in connection with the City
staff for the Administration, Engineering/Code Enforcement, and Police
departments, as well as common areas. While the total space needs
analysis was 22,450 square feet, architect Guilyard pointed out that after
subtracting out all of the wall, common space, vehicle storage area,
mechanical systems, etc., there was only about 9,000 to T0,000 square
feet of actual "people area". �It was also indicated that this would
probably require a parking space f or about 70 vehicles.
Barb Eschle indicated that she thought that it was important that the
City Hall allow room for future growth. Evelyn Fischer added that if
there was any thought of having community center facilities, even.sometime
in the future, that would have implications for the site selected.
Bob Pierce indicated that at today's prices, it would probably cost
approximately $70 to $75 per square foot for construction and site
preparation. Chair Gustafson said that he thought the bottom line of
August 28, 1985 City Hall Citizen's Committee Meeting
Page Three
cost was important. Lou Brenner added that he thought Mendota Heights
residents had an attitude of wanting to keep City government small and
basic, and we wouldn't want to foster the idea that we are expanding
government by buildi.ng an overly large City Hall.
Dave Zemke said that based on personal experience, he could vouch for
the fact that the City offices are very crowded, and he thought the
projected numbers were quite conservative.
Fred Fischer asked about the height of the building, to which Mr. Pierce
responded that it was usually less expensive to spread a building out than
go up, although that might not be the case in Mendota Heights with its
relatively high land values.
7. Future committee work program - It was felt that the group should try to
go on a�tour ofisome othericity hall facilities prior to the next regular
meeting, and agreed that we would try to do so on Monday, September 9th.
The City Administrator and architects will be responsible for setting up
the tour.
It was also agreed that the agenda for the next meeting should include at
least the following:
l. Some concensus on space analysis.
2. A rough estimate of cost from the architects for construction and
operation.
3. General financial considerations, including the lease versus build
options.
4. Discussion of general site preferences.
8. Date and time for future meetings - It was agreed that the next meeting
would be held on Monday, Septemb�er 16th, at 7:30 P.M., and that a day
and time for future meetings would be set at that meeting.
Motion by Jerry Morson, seconded by Evelyn Fischer, to adjourn the meeting at 9:50 P.M.
Motion passed unanimously.
Recorded and transcribed by Kevin D. Frazell, City Administrator.
`� u%,/� ' / /u
KDF:madlr
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
NOTICE OF HEARING TO DETERMINE AND CONSIDER ASSESSMENTS FOR
WATERMAIN TRUNK LINE, MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD EAST OF
TRUNK HIGHWAY 149
(IMPROVEMENT N0. 83, PRQJECT N0. 7B)
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County,
Minnesota, deems it necessary and desirable to consider the proposed assess-
ments for the improvements hereinafter described.
NOW THEREFORE, notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights will hold a public hearing on said proposed assessments at
the following time and place within the said City:
Date and Time:
Location:
Tuesday, Septebmer 17, 1985
8:00 o'clock P.M.
Mendota Heights City Hal1
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120
The general nature of the improvements heretofore known and designated as
Improvement No. 83, Project No. 7B for which said assessment are to be made
is:
The construction of watermain truck line, along Trunk Highway 149 from
Lake Drive South to Mendota Heights Road and Mendota Heights Road east
of Trunk Highway 149 by the Minnesota Department of Transportation,
including appurtenances and incidentals thereto.
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is situated within
the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota, and is more parti-
cularly described as follows:
All land adjacent to Trunk Highway 149 (Dodd Road) from Lake Drive
South to Mendota Heights Road and Mendota Heights Road East of Trunk
Highway 149.
It is proposed to assess every lot, piece or parcel of land benefited by
said improvements whether abutting thereon or not basEd upon benefits re-
ceived without regard to cash valuation in accordance with the proposed
assessment roll thereof which is now on file with the City Clerk of the City
of Mendota Heights at the City Hall of said City and which assessment roll
is open to public inspection.
Persons desiring to be heard with reference to the proposed assessments
should be present at this hearing.
Written or oral objections to said proposed assessments will be considered
at the meeting.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or
Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment roll
and f iling such notice with the District Court within 10 days after service
upon the Mayor or Clerk; however no appeal may be taken as to the amount of
any individual assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected
property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing
or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing.
You are hereby advised of the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections
435.193, 435.194, 435.195 which provides for the possibility of a deferral
of special assessments in the case of hardship for senior citizens.
This Council proposes to proceed under and pursuant to the authority granted
by Chapter 429 of the Minnesota Statutes.
Dated this 28th day of August, 1985.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
City of Mendota Heights
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES, AUGUST 28, 1985
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was called to
order at 8:49 o'clock P.M., following a joint City Council/Planning Commission
workshop. Members present were Kruse, Burke, Henning, McMonigal, Morson, Frank
and Stefani. Also present were Planning Consultant Howard Dahlgren and Public
Works Director Jim Danielson.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES An error was noticed in the minutes of July 23rd. Com-
missioner Stefani's friendly amendment to the approval
of Case #85-15 on page three was incorrect. Members
were unable to recall the correct verbage. Commissioner
Henning moved to table approval of the minutes so that
the secretary's notes could be checked. Commissioner
Frank seconded the motion.
� Ayes: 7
� Nays: 0
HEARING, CASE 85-17 Chairman Kruse called the meeting to order for the
SPANJERS, SUBDIVISION purpose of a continued public hearing at 8:52 on the
application by Mr. George Spanjers for the subdivision
of Lot 7, Somerset Hills. This parcel is located
between Marie avenue and Valley Curve, east of Wachtler
Avenue. Mr. Spanjers was present and pointed out that
he had addressed the Commission's concerns of last
meeting. He distributed new maps to the Commission
members that now illustrated the following changes:
1. The rear lot lines now follow the creek alignment.
2. Storm Water easements were added for the creek.
3. He had not combined lots S and 6 as requested but
had increased lot 6 and decreased lot 5 so that a home
on lot 6 could be located farther from the creek.
4. 12 soil borings had been made at the future home
sites and the report distributed.
Howard Dahlgren stated that he still recommends that
lots 5 and 6 be combined. He was not so much concerned -
about the distance of the future home from the creek as
he was about making the lots conform to the scale of
existing lots in the rest of the neighborhood.
Chairman Kruse after reviewing the soil reports noted
that he felt that lots 4 and S are borderline to needing
piled foundations.
Commissioner Morson noted that if a full 8' basement is
planned for lot 2, with the first floor elevation as
noted, the basement floor will be below the creek eleva-
tion. He is concerned about foundation drains for that
lot being emptied into the sanitary sewer.
Chairman Kruse invited questions from the audience and
their were none.
Commissioner Frank moved to close the up blic hearinQ at
9:15 P.M. Commissioner Henning seconded the motion.
Ayes: 7
Nays: 0
Commissioner Stefani moved to approve the revised
preliminary plat dated Au�ust 26, 1985 sub_ject to
staff's final review of plan and soil borinQs.
Commissioner Morson seconded the motion.
Chairman Kruse expressed a concern that he felt that lot
5 may not be buildable.
Ayes: 7
Nays: 0
HEARING, CASE 85-21, Chairman Kruse called the meeting to order for the
0'ROURKE, SUBDIVISION purpose of conducting a public hearing on an application
REPEAL by Eileen 0'Rourke to repeal a subdivsion. Roger Miller
was present representing Mrs. 0'Rourke who lives in
. California. He presented the facts concerning the
application stating that the original subdivision
combined 3 substandard lots to 2 buildable lots. She
now proposes to make available one of those three
substandard lots for sale to Mr. Robert Tousignant and
combine the remaining two lots to produce a 120' X
132.6' buildable lot. .
Chairman Kruse invited questions from the audience and
there were none.
Commissioner Stefani moved to close the up blic hearing
at 9:20 P.M. Commissioner Morson seconded the motion.
Ayes: 7
Nays: 0
Commissioner Frank moved to recommend approval of the
subdivision repeal. Commissioner Morson seconded the
motion.
Ayes: 7
Nays: 0
HEARING, CASE 85-23 Chairman Kruse called the meeting to order at 9:23 for
TANDEM/TCF, REZONING the purpose of a public hearing on an application by
PRELIMINARY PLAT, Tandem Corporation to rezone and subdivide 137 acres of
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT
land located adjacent to Huber Drive.
Mr. Dick Putnam and Jim Ostenson of Tandem Corporation
and Ken Adolph of Schoell and Madson, Inc. were present
to answer questions. Presentation was kept to a minimum
because the developer has been meeting with affected
residents and Commission members in advance of the
hearing to work out concerns.
Mr. Putnam stated that the present zoning of 40,000
square foot lots would be economically unfeasible
because of the high existing and future assessments
against the property for public utilities.
He stated that an easement was proposed as part of the
plat to retain the natural shoreline along the ponds
adjacent to Huber Drive.
Tandem is phasing this project into three separate
subdivisions and is only seeking approval for Phase I at
this time. Phase I is the northerly 37 acres.
Commissioner Morson expressed concern about the street
names with "Dodge" in them. It duplicates another
existing street name. Mr. Putnam stated he would change
the name.
Barb Gilbertson, 542 Huber Drive is concerned about the
transition from their 1 acre lots in the Montgomery
Addition to these smaller lots. She praised developer
for the accommodations he has already made.
Al Peterson, 2385 Apache Court was concerned that the
range in lot size might adversely affect house quality.
Smaller lots having cheaper homes.
Howard Dahlgren stated that Edina allows lots as small
as 10,000 square feet but the quality stays high
throughout. He doesn't feel it will be a problem here
either.
Mr. Putnam stated average lots price will be $35,000.
John Campbell, 2384 Apache Court, stated that he was
told this land will not develop. He is concerned about
wildlife on the lakes. He feels all wildlife will
disappear. He would like to see wildlife protected.
Chairman Kruse stated that the lakes adjacent to Huber
Drive are to be retained by the City as a passive park.
He went on to say he has three concerns about the
proposal.
1. Density - to be addressed in planning study.
2. Northwest corner of property has a cul-de-sac ex-
tending into the Nature Center. All lots along that
street are undersized and he suggests pulling the cul-
de-sac south and removing 1 lot.
3. The "natural" easement along the lake maybe should
be wider and the lot width should be wider to increase
openess along pond.
Commissioner McMonigal stated that she doesn't feel that
the wildlife will go away but that it would change.
Fertilizer and chemicals put on lawns will go into the
ponds and increase algae.
Alice Weed stated that those ponds have not always been
there. When they moved to the location 35 years ago
there were no ponds. They have grown over the years.
John Campbell stated that no study has been completed on
wildlife impact so all that we are stating tonight is
supposition.
Dick Putnam stated that if lots along the pond were
widened they would also be made shallower and more
uniform. The objective is to achieve variety lot sizes.
He further stated that he is working with the nature
center on access to their property and what is shown ir
what is desired at this time by the Center.
Commissioner Henning stated with lot prices in the range
of $30-50K the subdivision will certainly have high
quality houses. He stated that this project with some
more temporing is a good one for the City.
Chuck Gilbertson, 542 Huber Drive stated that Dick
Putnam has been very obliging to the resident's
concerns. He did want to echo a concern about the
wildlife question and transition from the 1 acre lots to
these new lots. Plantings should be completed along the
transition.
Dick Putnam stated he would accomplish the plantings but
that he felt that they should be put on the Gilbertson's
property so that they would have control of them.
Mrs. Weed stated that Tandem has been very cooperative
but that she was concerned about increase traffic.
Commissioner McMonigal stated that in addition to traf-
fic for this development 50,000 children visit the
nature center every year.
Dick Putnam stated that he felt that the Huber Drive
Mendota Heights Road link should be constructed as soon
as possible and that that would help relieve the traffic
prablem.
It was noted that a letter fram George Weed relative to
the project was received.
Comrnissioner Morsan moved ta continue the up blic hearin�
to the September mee�ing. Stefani seconded the motion.
Ayes; 7
Nays: 0
HEARING, CASE 85-24 Chairman Kruse cailed the meeting to order at 10:35 P.M.
YORKTON LTD. for the purpose of a public hearing ta cansider a
REZONING, SUBDIVISION rezoning appiication and subdivision applicatian by
York�an, Lt�.
Mr. Larry Lee handed out a document explaining his
praposal and gave an oral presentation«
SCaff expressed some concern abaut the late submission
of Mr. Lee's proposal and tha� a tharough camprehensive
review has not been able to be campleted.
Questians from the audience were invited,
Joe Schmidtz who owns �he Canvenience Store east of
Lexing�on Avenue was curious about the proposal but had
no particular cancerns.
Commissioner Stefani moved to close the u� blic hearing.
Commissianer Marson secanded �he mation.
Ayes: 7
Nays: 0
Commissioner Stefani moved to approve the rezoninQ and
subdivision subject to workin� aut staff's concerns
about �he pro_ject before the Council meeting. Commis-
sioner Morson seconded the motian.
Commissioner Henning stated the he was concerned about
approving a project before staff's concerns were
addressed. i
Commissioner Morsan withdrew his second to the motion.
Commissioner Stefani withdrew his motian. �
Cammissianer Morson moved to table discussion on the
request until 6:45 P.M., September lo, 1985.
Commissioner Hennin� seconded the motion,
Ayes: 7
Nays : 0
�:
0
a
�
�
s s
'�� �} • _ �� .- ie
.;'.+'w
• � � �+�
�� �A����_�iQ. 85-25,
� ���.�.
� HUNTER VARIANCE
, yc,�>x .
, ��`,��. �
;;+:
Y, .� �ry � ,s,�r`'. . -
' :o���t+,'
. � {;�".
, i ,�.'�r,�'�,��
�. =:�:,a:�;��;�
.:�..
��' • e�°�
s'#`ta ;��: � ':��`�.,
`���.�`-� : ";�•.
=�.aMyS„GF��.x�. t.
.yP"�� i � :' � �
.. ; '1h'.d..,. .
Stefani, Frank
. 85-26
i VARIANCE
�
Dr. Steven Hunter, 1175 Orchard Place was present to
request ap'proval of a 3 foot variance to the height
requirement for a single family home.
Commissiorier Stefani stated that he did not feel that
there was hardship involved and was opposed to the
variance.
Howard Dahlgren stated that height variances never have
a hardship involved, that height restrictions are to
keep people from doing something outlandish and to keep
some sort of order in height.
Commissioner Frank stated that he was opposed to the
variance because the structure was on the bluff line.
Commissioner Burke moved to recommend approval of a 3
foot variance to the height requirement and 1 story
variance to the 3 story height requirement. _
Commissioner Hennin� seconded the motion. ,
Mr. Ray McLevish, 704 Ray Street, St. Paul, was present
to request a 10 foot variance to the lot width
requirement and a 3 square foot variance to the�440 square
foot garage size requirement..
Commissioner Burke moved to recommend approval of the
requested 10 foot lot width variance and 3 square ," �c�o.tr,
ag rage area requirement. Commissioner McMonigal
seconded the motion. s . �
Commissioner Stefani stated' that he now recalled what
his motion was in the July minutes and�proposed a
correction to the July minutes. ,,, .
Commissioner Hennin� moved �proval of the Ju1y 2� 1985
meeting minutes as corrected. Commissioner Frank
seconded the motion.
There being no further business to come before�the
Commission, Commissioner Burke moved that the meeting be
adjourned. Commissioner Morson seconded the motion.
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:26 o'clock P.M.
.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 28, 1985
T0: Mayor, City Council and City Ad c(i���or
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Mendota Heights Road Construction
Lexington Avenue to Trunk Highway 55
M.S.A. Project No. 140-103-06
Job No. 8426
Improvement No. 84, Project No. 6
DISCUSSION:
Bids are to be opened September 3, 1985 for the upgrading of Mendota Heights
Road from Lexington Avenue to Trunk Highway 55. This project is to be paid for
entirely by M.S.A. funding.
The construction season is rapidly coming to a close for asphalt projec�.-in
Minnesota therefore if we get some good bids from reputable contractors staff
will bring a request for an award to the Council as an add-on item Tuesday
evening.
{
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
T0: Mayor, City Council and City i��ator
FROM: James E. Danielsan
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: McLevish Variance
Case No. 85-26
DISCiJSSION:
August 2$, 1985
The P3anning Commissiarr at their August meetirrg reviewed Mr. McLevish's
� lot width vara.ance request (see attached staff reports).
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commi.ssion voted unanimausly ta recommend to the City
Council �hat Mr. McLevish be granted his requested variance.
ACTION RF UIRED:
If Council wa.shes to implement the Planning Cammission's recommenda-
:� tion, they shauld pass a motion granting Lot 12, Block 2, Guadalupe Heights
a].0 faot yard wicl�h variance.
C
0
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�
0
T0: Mayor, City Council and City Admi s��
F'ROM: James E. Danielsan
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Hunter Variance
Case No. 85-25
DISCUSSION:
August 28, 1985
The Planning Commission at their August meeting reviewed Dr. Hunter's
height variance requests (see at�ached staff repor�s).
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission voted 5-2 to recommend tha�. Dr. Hunter be
granted his requested variances.
- ACTION REQUIRED:
If Cauncil wishes to implement the Planning Cammission's recommenda-
�ion, they shauld pass a mo�ion granting Lat 3, Block l, Fiur�ter Bluff
Addit9.on a three foot height variance and I story variance.
0
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 28, 1985
, T0: Mayor, City Council and City Ad ' �tor
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Spanjers Preliminary Plat
Case No. 85-17
�
DISCUSSION:
A public hearing was conducted at the July Planning Commission meeting to
consider this subdivision. At that meeting several concerns were raised and the
hearing was continued to the August meeting so that the applicant could make the
necessary changes.
Staff has discovered in the interim that there are some deferred assessments
against the property that will need to be paid at the time of approval of the
final plat:
Sewer
Water
Street
Project
68-2
68-6
73-2
� DEFERRED AMOUNT
Total
$5,112.70
$5,515.97
-0-
Def erred
$3,000.00
$3,280.00
$8,100.00
$14,380.00
Assessed
$2,112.70
$2,235.97
��"
To this figure is added seven percent (7%) interest since the projects were
assessed:
DEFERRED AMOUNT $14,380.00
• • INTEREST 13,504.00
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $27,884.00
The five new lots also need to contribute $600 per lot for the Park fund,
which totals $3000.
RECONA4ENDAT ION •
The Planning Commission recommends approval of this preliminary plat. Staff
also recommends approval subject to Mr. Spanjers entering into an agreement with
�
the City that addresses payment to the City of the above described amounts. �nis ,
agreement should also address bringing public sewer and water services to Lots 2,
3 and 4.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the Planning Commission and staff
recommendation they should pass a motion approving the plat subject to the
applicant executing a Developer's Agreement with the City addressing deferred
assessments, park contribution and utility installation.
-r:
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 28, 1985
T0: Mayor, City Council and Ci i��r
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer
SUBJECT: Budget Hearing
Revenue Sharing Hearing
As required by Minnesota Statutes and Federal Revenue Sharing regulations
we are to hold preliminary hearing on the proposed 1986 City Budget.
. The notice of the proposed hearing was published on August 19, and the
Hearing scheduled for 7:30 P.M. on�September 3. A copy of the preliminary
budget is included in the packet for the meeting, and the purpose of the
hearing is to receive citizen's input as necessary to the proposed expenditures.
No formal action need to be taken at this hearing. While September 10 was
originally set for the annual budget review workshop, that date has now been
set aside for continued discussion of the Southeast Area Study. Therefore,
we need to select another date in early-to-mid September for budget review.
ACTION
Call a hearing - receive citizen's input - close hearing. Agree on
a new date for the budget review.
LES:kkh
attachment
,��. ��
�,,�,� . ��-�
� �� � X
( ��
�
c
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 28, 1985
T0: Mayor, City Council and City A'n}s�attor
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: 0'Rourke Subdivision Repeal
Case No. 85-21
DISCUSSION:
The Planning Co�nission at their August meeting conducted a public
hearing to consider the repeal of the 0'Rourke subdivision (see attached
staff reports).
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the
0'Rourke subdivision be rescinded.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council wishes to implement the Planning Commission's recommenda—
tion, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 85— , RESOLUTION
APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 2, 3, AND 4, FURLONG ADDITION.
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION N0. 85-
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 2, 3, AND 4, FURLONG ADDITION
WHEREAS, Eileen F. 0'Rourke owner of Lots 2, 3, and 4, Furlong
Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota, has requested from the City to divide
that lot into two (2) lots; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed� said lot split and finds the
same to be in order.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights, Minnesota, that the lot division submitted at this meeting
be and the same is hereby approved.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 3rd day of
September, 1985. .
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
�
�:
S;
si
B
T0:
1�3�1,'�
SUBJECT:
J
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 28, 1985
Mayor and City Council
Kevin D. r i�l��ty Administrator
Selection of Public Works Superintendent
We received 41 applications in response to the advertisements for a
Public Works Superintendent. Of these, 17 met our minimum qualifications as
� set forth.in the job descri'ption.
Jim and I have narrowed the�list ta nine (including three current employees)
who we feel rank highest and, �therefore,'�should be considered. Our plan is to
interview the nine, then check references and do any other follow up which
seems appropriate. We, hopeful°ly, can have a�recommendation for appointment
by early October. _ .
In the past few years;=Council has nat been directly involved in 'the _
�selection of'employees below the level of'department head. Rather, the
City Administrator and�appropriate Department Head have carried out the selection
, process.. Unless Council wishes to change that precedent, we will proceed as
outli.ned-above. �
ACTION REQUIRED -
This memo is for information only, and no Council action is require� at '
thi.s time.
KDF:kkh
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 28, 19$5
T0: Mayor, City Cauncil and City �,n�' at r
FR�M: James E. Danielsan
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Curley Addition Bike Trail
Job No. 8418
HTSTORY:
In i984 the City agreed to construct a gravel trail through the City owned
Curley Addition lot connecting that neighborhoad with Rogers Lake Park. Tn 1985,
�he City further undertook to construct a portion of the backbone trail system.
That systern fol'lows an alignment through the Curley Addition lot,
DISCUSSION:
The Curley lo� is the anly portion of the newly constructed backbone cor-
ridar that is unpaved and the Park and Recreatian Commissian naw want ta pave it.
The Maples who live next to the lot have called and requested that the lot be
paved. The gravel surface washed aut during the heavy August rain so it is now
evident that the unpaved path will be a maintenance problem for �he �ity.
RECOMMENDATION•
The Park and Recreation Commission and staff recommend that park funds be
used to pave �he Curley bike path this summer. Quotes have been obtained from
two contractors; Ace Blacktap -$1227 and Daily and Son -$I125.
ACTION REQUIRED•
.If Cquncil wishes to implement the Park and Recrea�ion Commission and
staff's recommendation �hey shauld pass a motion directing s�aff ta prepare a
purchase order to Uaily and Son in the amaunt of $1125 to pave the bike trail
thraugh the Curley Additian 1ot.
�
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 28, 1985
T0: Mayor , City Council and City A r�n�tr�'ator
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Zaspel Easement
HISTORY:
Mr. and Mrs. Noel Zaspel live at 1792 Ridgewood Drive, adjacent to the
Krajniak property (see map). The Krajniak's property is entirely within a City
wetlands, however they received a permit from the City 7 or 8 years ago to
deposit enough fill on the lot to allow for the construction of a home. The
Krajniak's were depositing more fill than the permit allowed and the City took
action to stop them. After many meetings with the City Council and staff in an
attempt to negotiate a solution to the problem of overfilling, the City had to
take legal actions to try and force the Krajniaks to comply with the conditions
of the permit. That matter is still unresolved.
DISCUSSION:
The filling done on Krajniak's property created a drainage way between the
Krajniaks and Zaspels. That drainage way now overflows and floods a portion of
the Zaspel`s back yard. A City storm wat'er pipe empties into the drainageway, so
the City promised to go onto the Zaspel's property and do some minor filling and
corrective grading if easements were dedicated from both the Zaspels and
Krajniaks. The Zaspels have now submitted the attached easement.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached easement agree-
ment with the Zaspels and authorize staff to complete grading and filling work on
their property as necessary to confine the drainage from the City's storm pipe to
within the easement.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation, they should pass a
motion authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to execute the easement on behalf of the
City and direct staff to complete the grading and filling as necessary.
� ,�� c�,-i a. � �.-��«s c>, �,�� �
, /a �'� 020-76 �
� .�baa8-A
. ,
,
--�-_ --- --- _._ .__
�
:�
� � Thos GT. �YJ'air.�
� /O Rc.
Oi0-I8
� .�.%rQ,�2g-i� - • ' r
�
�
� , �11�
� G23-;y .�LaZ9-83.�
--� t',ar/ t-� £ EYe�/ir�e G�i-�r,cT,o�r�do� -..___.._ ....
!, $ �7 �G. p2t-79 �
`. z��ob�—�s -
�" � � ,
' zb9.9s . � ea �-�:.8a1 33^?.6�' V
o"Y .
� � �� �+t 6 • � � � �
� . �. $ /7'cf-.sche-/ .6. 13 Edi�`h �1.
1�
� 2d•ri.;,.. .`ss" f 33g.o� �9r-�wvh�"�d 030-79
z �r, zz, .
�. ` Z SaA� ,��r03}-'�l1 � "
� z
�n �a •'
;� Z 4' ' j''� ,�$o.y� RRTftutt F*� NRNCy F�, PARTR
'325-93 s � F Z �� /9G. 04�-79
� - ' ° .2. {.a3� - A3
� .� .
. ,r,. ��, . h
�P3 s� � ' •s
` � �'�' +r-., � '" N!i/f�n 050 -79 �
�ge. q ' `-. �i 1dy r� ' Hf.�de-bi-�r�d"
zve za�. 7.q , tt{ � � ,,q� .
c�','. �s.zs"' " �„ '#� � i 2Ge'�t-
"�'�o
� Q � 4 � 0?2 - 79 ' 07I-79 '
^�i �$ � � ""f' � a N . � � ; ' b'crr�o �, Gcv � ' :
� v �: � � �'o_r�+mdi�r,.
� fVr�► �` 060-79 �;
200 2d4,7A �t Z O.Zj �p ��
- _ � O r ,'� � ., �. • :f 7 n -
--�� !� ., �.• •�, . -. • � , . . .. . � . .1 • ;'✓�a.'r;i ^:'�;s:". • '
1���' °'k.�...�!1iH -i:v?p.'t .i"!:.
0
zA�sp�L
�R'�4�'Nr,q-�
,}
n
c
�
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 29, 1985
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. Fraze C�r .�ldministrator
��`' -
SUBJECT: NSP Proposed Electric Rate Increase
Attached is a letter from St Paul Councilman William L. Wilson concerning
NSP's rate increase request. The letter seems to be slightly vague in what
action he is requesting at this time, but if Council has any suggestions or
interest in becoming involved with the issue, we could pursue it further.
Council may recall that we terminated membership in the Suburban Rate
Authority last year, because no City Official was interested in being active
with the group.
ACTION REQUIRED
1'o decide if we want to have further involvement with the issue, and if
so, direct Staff accordingly.
KDF:kkh
attachment
August 29, 1985
�
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMO
Kevin Frazell, Cit 1�'u"f�.f'i�rator
Dennis J. Delmont, Chief of Polic
REVISED PATROL SCHEDULE
Because of the new FSLA decision, an inefficient patrol schedule and our manpower
shortage, I have revised the patrol schedule. The new schedule complies with
the FSLA, provides us with 99 extra "man-days" on patrol and eli.minates days
where only 4 officers are scheduled to cover a 24 hour period. A.comparison
appears below:
OLD
208 days scheduled per year
10 hours per day
2080 hours per year
112 day random work periods
rrEta
219 days scheduled per year
9.5 hours per day
2080.5 hours per year
25 day constant work periods
(5 on 3 off 5 on 3 off 5 on 4 off)
Although we gain 99 shifts, we still do not approach the point of having two
officers on the street at all times. New officers in 1986 will bring us closer
to that "ideal level".
DJD:cb
it iiii ���) iii�
,�,� league of mir�n�sot� cities
CONGRESSIQNAL ACTION ON FLSA NEEDS SUPPORT FROM CITIES
Legislation introduced in the U.S. Senate to provide exemption fram
Federal Fair Labar Standards overtime pay requirements for cities
(and states) needs bipartisan suppart. All members of the Minnesata
Gongressianal Delegation must�hear im�nedia�e3y from local officials
urgi.ng action ta deal with both the problems of' overtime compensation
and vo3unteers. If cities do nat �e�zerate significan� mamentum zn -
ongress in the next month (September) for changes or exemptians,
city lobbying efforts are not likely ':o suecessfully overeome serious
opposition�by 2abor organizations.
ftesolutions from city councils are rn.�:ded ta ur�e Cangressmen and Senator
Boschwitz to support S. 1570, a bill��roposed by Senator Dan Nickles
{R-�kla.). Senaiar Durenber�er is onf: of the co-sponsors of this bill.
The bill would permit an exemption frc�m FLSA overtime pay requirements
for state and loeal employees, permi:t;ing tne use af compensatary time
aff S.n lieu af overtime compensation; grant exempt status (from FLSA} for
individuals who volunteer services for state and local government; and
eliminate the retroaetive application of Federal Fai.r Labor Standards to
state and local government.
There is no legislation comparable to S. 1570 in the U.S. House of
Representatives. Ta date, response iI•otn House members has not been
encouraging. Most propasals under cor�sideratian would only assist
public"�safety employee work shifts tca permit law enforeement and
firefig'ii.ter personnel ta take compen:�«tory time off in place of
avertime pay if sueh an arrangement �:; made part of a contract or
eolleetive bargaining agreement. Whi.ie several Minnesota Congressmen
admit the impact of FLSA requirements is much broader than that
addressed in eurrent House proposals, to-date none have agreed to
support more comprehensive exemption.� for ca.ty employees. Without
increased pressure from local QiliC3.CLls, it is possa.ble that the
only ehanges cities wiil get will be to provide some adjustment of
pay requirements for public safety ea���loyees (but even that may be
limited, as nated above.}
The National League of Cities, along wi�h ather state and 2ocal
government associations, supports S. 1570, which inaorporates ehanges
requested by NLC in a July 22 letter ta President Reagan.
;trong support by cities on this matter is essential if Congressional
actian is to be forthcoming. Many m�rr�bers af Cangress are simply not
'f 83 university avenue east, st. p�ul, minn�sota 5�'I O'I tF'} 2) �27-56C10
r
:' i
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 29, 1985
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. Fraz 't Ad ' ist tor
SUBJECT: Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
Attached is an action alert from LMC urging Councils to pass resolutions
supporting Senate File 1570, which would provide some relief to State and
local governments from strict compliance with the FLSA.
As some of you may know, in the 1972 case, NationalLeague of Cities vs.
Usery, the Supreme Court (on a 5-4 vote) ruled it unconstitutional for the
federal government to apply the FLSA to State and local government. In
February of this year, in Garcia vs. San Antonio Transit, the court reversed
itself (again 5-4), saying that State and localities were covered.
The most onerous provision of FLSA is that overtime compensation,
except in very restricted circumstances, must be paid at 12 x the normal base
rate, as opposed to allowing compensatory time. Overtime is for any work over
40 hours, even if in a different City job. Therefore, our public works employees
who are also firefighters must be paid overtime for all their after-hours fire
involvement. Although there are special provisions for police officers, we
have had to go from 10 to 92 hour shifts. Attached is a memo from Dennis
describing the change.
Contrary to Congressiona] testimony by national union leaders, the change
does not appear to be popular with public employees, at least in this part of
the country. Many of our employees have expressed to me their dismay at not
having the opti.on of compensatory time, and express hope that th�e law can be
changed. Yet Congress seems reluctant to grant legislative relief because they
are hearing that employees benefit by FLSA coverage.
RECOh1MENDATION
Senate File 1570 apparently would address the most troublesome aspects of '
FLSA coverage. I would recommend your passage of a resolution to be directed +^
our Representatives and Senators.
ACTION REQUIRED
Motion to pass Resolution No. 85- .
KDF:kkh attachments
CITY OF MENI}OTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 29, 1985
T0: Mayor, City Council and City 'n' of�
�
FROM: Klayton Eckles
Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Lake LeMay Flooding
Job No. 8310
INTRODUCTION:
The unusually high precipitation experienced the last three years has raised
Lake LeMay to an alarming level. There is a possibility that the water level of
Lake LeMay could continue to rise and cause substantial property damage and
impede access to homesteads. Therefore the proper course of action in the event
of flooding is being planned until a more permanent solution can be implemented.
DISCUSSION:
There are only two possible alternatives available if the City chooses to
act upon this problem.
1. One viable temporary solution involves the use of high capacity field
pumps to carry the water away from the affected area. This option is li.mited in
that Lake Augusta is the only area with a large storage capacity that is within
range of the pumps available. Pumping water into Lake Augusta, itself a land-
locked lake, could cause damage to foilage along its shores. Every foot Lake
LeMay is lowered would raise Lake Augusta about 8 inches. Therefore if Lake
Augusta is also at a very high level this option may not be available. The cost
to implement this option, including pump rental, labor and operational costs
would be about $3,500.
2. The other alternative involves the extensive use of sandbags or earth
berms to form a protective barrior. This option could only be used to protect
homesteads and access to homesteads. Due to the long term unreliability of this
type of procedure it could only be used to "buy time" until a long term solution
could be implemented. Generally all work would take place on the.homeowner's
property at the homeowner's expense. However, the City could choose to supply
labor and equipment to aid in the construction.
ACTION REQUIRED:
The lake level is not currently threatening therefore no specific action is
required at this time. Staff will continue to work on the feasibility regarding
a permanent lake level control.
1
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 30, 1985
T0: Mayor and City Counc'1 �
FROM: Kevin D. Frazell, �c P�r(inistrator
SUBJECT: Contract for Master Parks Study
Attached is a proposed contract between the City and Barton-Aschman
Associates, Inc., for a project eniitled, Mendota Heights Park and Recreation
Facility Planning.
Based on a quick review, the contract appears consistent with our expecta-
tions for the project. Staff and the City Attorney will review the agreement
in more detail prior to Tuesday's meeting. _
ACTION REQUIRED
To consider any Staff or Attorney suggestions, and pass a motion authorizing
the Ma.yor and City Clerk to execute the agreement with Barton-Aschman Associates,
`r� Inc., for the Mendota Heights Park and Recreation Facility Planning Project.
KDF:kkh
Attachment
r:
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
1610 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454 612-332-0421
August 27, 1985
Mr. James E. Danielson, P.E.
Public Works Director
City of Mendota Heights
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120
Dear Mr. Danielson:
We have enclosed for your review and signature two copies of the Mendota Heights Park
and Recreation Facility Study contract.
The basis of this contract was drawn specifically from our proposal. Oualifications were
added to denote that tasks requiring mapping will be completed to a level of detail
commensurate with available base mapping. Dur fee for the study has been adjusted
downward to $19,100 in anticipation of the city providing topographic or half section
mapping for specific existing or proposed park sites.
Please sign both contracts if their contents meet with your approval. One copy should be
kept for your records and the second returned to Barton-Aschman.
We look forward to working with you in the next four months. Please call me if you have
specific questions.
Sincerely,
ry �� � ����
Barr J� rner ���
Y
Senior Associate �
BJW:kro
�
0
�! � ^
� `t
0
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
August 30, 1985
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. Fraxe C� �(dministrator
SUBJECT: Offers far Wachtier and Kirchner Froperties
; +.'•.i; �,
• Attached are purchase offers for the Wachtl.er and Kirchner properties,
as directed by Counci3 at the August 20 meeting. I naticed thai the contingency
clause is inaccurately in the Kirchner rather than Wachtler offer. I will ask
aur Attorney, Dave Moran to have corrected agreements available 7uesday evening.
�
ACTION REQUiRED
Authorizat�on from the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreements,
and for Staff and the Attorney ta present to the owners. '
KDF:kkh
� attachment
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
Angust 30, 1985
T0: Mayor, City Council and City A i�ri��r
FROM: Klay�.on Eckles
Civi1. Engineer
SUB.IECT: Traffic Control Signs for lst Avenue and Emersan Neighborhood
IN'TRODUCTION :
A� the request of Robert Meyer at 1399 Clement, staff has completed
study of the traffic situation on Emerson, Clement and ls� Avenue. Staf:
concluded a problem does indeed exist in this area. �
DISCUSSION•
a
Mr. Meyer proposed adding a stop sign for westbound traffic on lst �
Avenue while keeping the yield sign for eastbound traffic in p�.ace. This
praposal is not feasible according the manual of Unifarm Traffic Controll
Devices. Yield signs and stop signs glaced in the same intersection wauld
cause confusion and indecision on Che driver's part. Instead staff proposes
a stop sign be added for westbound traffic an lst Avenue and the yield sign
replaced wi�h a stop sign. This wauld end the problem of westbound traffic
on lst Avenue and southbound traffic on Clement both having the right-of�
way.. Traffic sauthbound on Clement would have priority. This praposal�
would also slow �raffic on lst Avenue ta al.low time far motorists unf amiliar
wi�h the area to make a decision and also slaw traffic down to a safe �
cornering speed �o turn onto C].ement.
Mr. Meyer's other proposal was to replace the yield sign on northbound
Medora at Emerson with a stag sign. Staff feels there is no reason to �
change the sign at this time. A yieid sign is actual.ly a stronger
regulatory contral than a stop sign. A stop sign is warranted if traff�.c
volumes are relatively heavy but thzs is not the case. �
During �he study af �he area staff discovered two yield signs in pl
on north and southbound Knollwaod Lane at Emerson that are not covered b
the current ordirtance far stree� signs Therefore these signs should be
remaved or the current ordinance shauld be amended.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recammends that Ordinance No. lil3, "An Ordinance Establishing
Stop and Yie.ld Intersections Within the City of Mendota Heights," be amen
with an additian af lst Avenue east and westbaund as a stop street and
a,
Clement a through street, and the exclusion of the pravision pertaining to
ls� Avenue as a yield street and Clemen� as a thraugh street, and �.he
additian of north and southbound Knallwaod as a yield street and Emerson as
a thraugh s�reet.
ACTION REQUIRED•
If the Council chooses to implement staff's recommendation, Coun-
ci1 should adopt a Ordinance No. , An Ordinance Amending Ordi.-
nance No. 1113.
�
a
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
September 3, 1985
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. Fra 1��
Cit Admin' trator
Y
SUBJECT: Add-on Agenda for September 3rd City Council Meeting
It is recommended that the agenda be adopted with the addition of one
item to the Consent Calendar. Also, there is additional information on two
items that are scheduled on the agenda.
3. Agenda Adoption
It is recommended that the agenda be adopted with the addition of item ��
5f. Grand Opening of I-494/Dodd Road Interchange
if .
The 494/Dodd Road interchange is scheduled to be open two weeks from
today, September 17. Because of the number of past and upcoming grand opening
events scheduled in Dakota County for the interstate system, Mn/DOT has suggested
that we keep this a simple occasion. However, both Mn/DOT, the City of Eagan, and
I agree that we should have some minor ceremony with a photo opportunity for the
press. This would probably be something along the lines of the two Mayors meeting
to jointly cut a ribbon, in accompaniment with local and highway department dignit-
aries. Mn/DOT has suggested 11:30 A.M. as an appropriate time for such a
ceremony.
Unless Council feels that we should do something different than that proposed
by Mn/DOT, we will proceed to develop this plan. The only Council action required
at this time is to mark your calendars for the ceremony at 11:30 A.M., on the 17th.
8a. Bid Award for Mendota Heights Road Construction
Bids were received this morning. Please see the attached memo from
Engineer Klayton Eckles for a tabulation and recommendation for bid award.
9.h Master Park Plan Study
9h. Acting City Attorney Mo�ran has reviewed and approved the agreement as
submitted by Barton-Ashman. The only substantative change is in Section 4.10.1,
where we have added the hourly billing rate for the special consultant, Mary Ellen
Ordal, at $25.00 to $35.00 per hour.
KDF:madlr
-attachment
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
September 3, 1985
T0: Mayor, City Council and City Ad is�tq�
FROM: Klayton Eckles
Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Mendota Heights Road Upgrading
Lexington Avenue to Trunk Highway 55
M.S.A. Project No. 104-103-06
Job No. 8428
Improvement No. 84, Project No. 6
DISCUSSION:
The attached resolution indicates the result of bids for the above
project that was received today, September 3, 1985.
The low bid from M. Danner Trucking, Inc. is seven percent (7%) below
the Engineer's Estimate.
� RECON�IENDATION :
Staff recommends awarding the contract to M. Danner Trucking, Inc. of
Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation, they should
pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 85- , RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STREETS, CURB AND GUTTER AND STORM
SEWER CONSTRUCTION ON I�NDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD BETWEEN LEXINGTON AVENUE AND
TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 (IMPROVEMENT N0. 84, PROJECT N0. 6; M.S.A. PROJECT N0. 104-
103-06)
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION N0. 85-
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STREETS,
CURB AND GUTTER AND STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION ON MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD BETW�EN
LEXINGTON AVENUE AND TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 (IMPROVEMFNT N0. 84, PROJECT N0. 6;
MSA PROJECT N0. 140-103-06)
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the proposed construction of
streets, curb and gutter and storm sewer improvements to on Mendota Heights Road
between Lexington Avenue and Trunk Highway 55 (which improvements have heretofore
been known and designated as Improvement No. 84, Project No. 6), bids were
received, opened and tabulated according to law and the following bids were
received complying with said advertisement:
NAME OF BIDDER
M. Danner Trucking, Inc.
Inver Grove Heights, MN
Preferred Paving, Inc.
Waconia, Minnesota
Valley Paving, Inc.
Shakopee, Minnesota
Bituminous Roadways, Inc.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Alexander Construction Co. Inc.
Apple Valley, Minnesota
and
BASE BID
$142,181.75
$153,883.50
$160,498.75
$161,559.00
$176,522.50
WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommended that the low bid submitted by M. Danner
Trucking of Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota, be accepted. �
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the bid of M. Danner Trucking, Inc. of Inver Grove Heights, Minne-
sota, submitted for the construction of the above described improvements be
and the same is hereby accepted.
2. That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to
execute and deliver any and all contracts and documents necessary to
consummate the awarding of said bids.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Fieights this 3rd day of
September, 1985.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON SEPTEBMER 3, 1985
Gas Piping License:
Heat n Cool, Inc.
Vollhaber Heating
General Contractor's License:
Golden Eagle Buildens, Inc.
0'Connell Construction/Renovation
Midwest Construction Company
K.W. Arms Construction
Exterior Design Studio
Heating and Air Conditioning Licens�:
Heat n Cool, Inc.
Vollhaber Heating
Plastering/Stucco License:
Williams Drywall Company
fi
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE N0.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 1113
The City Council of the City Mendota Heights, Minnesota, ordains
as follows:
SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 1113, known and referred to as "An
Ordinance Establishing Stop and Yield Intersections Within The City of
Mendota Heights" is hereby amended in the following respects:
The following streets are hereby added to Section 1 of said
Ordinance, "THROUGH STREETS AND STOP INTERSECTIONS,"
Throu�h Streets
Clement Street
Stop Streets
lst Avenue
The following streets are hereby removed from Section 2 of said
Ordinance, "THROUGH STREETS AND YIELD INTERSECTIONS,"
Through Streets
Clement Street
Yield Streets
lst Avenue (Eastbound)
The following streets are hereby added to Section 2 of said
Ordinance "THROUGH STR�ETS AND YIELD INTERSECTIONS,"
ThrouQh Streets
Emerson Avenue
Yield Street
Knollwood Lane
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its publication according to law.
Adopted and ordained into an Ordinance this 3rd day of September,
1985.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
ATTEST :
� Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION N0. 85-
RESOLUTION URGING LEGISLATIVE SUPPORT FOR SINATE FILE 1570
WHEREAS, on February 19,1985, in Garcia versus San Antonia, the
, U.S. Supreme Court ruled that State and local governments are
covered by provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act; and
WHEREAS, it is estimated that compliance with the law will add
billions of dollars to the cost of State and local government; and
WHEREAS, the Iaw creates particularly onerous problems for
.: local governments, like Mendota Heights, which have full-time
employees that also serve as volunteer firefighters; and
WHEREAS, the law is not only expensive for State and local
governments, but also is unpopular with substantial numbers of
public employees who prefer to have the option of compensatory time
off for overtime work.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights urges Senators David Durenberger, Senator Rudy
Boschwitz, and Representative Bruce Vento to support Senate File
1570 and any House companion legislation, which will provide relief
from the most onerous provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this
Third day of September, 1985.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Robert G. Lockwood
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
0
��Y
�. Yiearing that the impact of Garcia v. San Antonio (U.S. Supreme Court
:.� decision of Feb. 19, 1985 mandating application of FLSA to state and
local government) is causing problems for cities.
Liability questions for cities as well as the immediate high cost of
volunteer services make FLSA one of the most significant challenges
facing city officials. With a 2-3 year possible liability exposure
to employee lawsuits and a 3 year limit for willful violation, cities
stand to risk harsh and punitive actions resulting from FLSA
enforcement scheduled to begin October 15, with retroactive liability
to last April 151
Some of the most damaging results will hamper volunteer firefighter
services in many small cities where city employees holding regular
city personnel positions also act as volunteer firefighters.
According to FLSA regulations, such employees who earn $2.50 or more
per fire call are considered non-exempt and must be accorded all
overtime compensation under FLSA requirements. Average hourly pay for
both regular employment and volunteer firefighter duty is the
generally applied method of computation to determine the base rate
which is then multiplied oy 1/2 times the number of hours over �40 to
calculate the overtime pay due.
Emphasize the difficulties and corr;�lications that result for your city
in applying the cumbersome FLSA re�;t�lations to city operations and
personnel management. Be specific about increased costs and the harm
resulting to the carrying out of basic city services.
Please send a copy of City Council Resolutions and/or correspondence
to the LMC Office. Much depends on your response in this matter.
We need to make our Congressional Delegation aware that this is not a
partisan issue, but rather an essential issue of directly affecting
the ability of cities to deliver basic service at a reasonable cost.
�
0
F"a�� Na. 2334
September 3, 1985
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of th� Ra��ula�• Maa�.it�Y�
Held Tuesday, September 3, 1'�85
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City
Council, City o£ Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall,
750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The followinc
members were present: Mayor Lockwood, Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins,
Hartmann and Witt.
AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Witt moved adoption of the egenda for
the meeting including additional items contained in
the add-on agenda.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: O
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Ayes: 5
Nays: O
Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of the minutes
of the August 6th meeting with corrections.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the consent
calendar as submitted and recommended for approval as
part of the regular agenda, along with authorization
for execution o£ all necessary documents contained
therein.
a. Acknowledgement o£ the minutes of the August 28th
Planning Commission meeting.
b. Acknowledgement o£ a memo on selection o£ a Public
Works Superintendent.
c.
�
e.
Acknowledgement of the Code En£orcement monthly
report for August. ,
Approval of the List of Claims dated September 3,
1985 and totalling 5136,061.48.
Approval of the list of contractor licenses,
granting licenses to:
. Hest n Cool, Inc. Gas Piping License
Vollhaber Heating Gas Piping License
Golden Eagle Builders, Inc. General Contractor License
0'Connell Conatruction/ General Contractor LicensE
Renovation
�
H
Page No. 2335
September 3, 1985
Midwest Construction Co. General Contractor Licens
K.W. Arms Construction General Contrector Licens
Exterior Design Studio General Contractor Licens
Heat n Cool, Inc. Htg./Air Conditioning Lic
Vollhaber Heating Htg./Air Conditioning Lic
Williams Drywall Company Plastering/Stucco License
f. Acknowledgement of a notice that the I-494/Dodd
Road interchange Grand Opening will be conducted
on September 17th at 11:30 A.M.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: O
ROGERS LAKE LEVEL Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from the
City Administrator regarding a letter from a resident
questioning why the level of Rogers Lake was dropped
and asking Council to consider raising the level. Th�
Council concensus was that there is no basis for
consideration of raising the lake level.
TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN5 Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from Ci
Engineer Eckles regarding a tra£fic study on Emer_ .i,
Clement and First Avenue prepared in response to a
request £rom Robert Meyer, 1399 Clement. In his memo
the Engineer informed Council that a problem does
exist and recommended that stop signs be installed on
First Avenue at Clement, that yield signs be placed a
northbound and southbound Knollwood Lane at Emerson
Avenue, and the yield sign on First Avenue (�astbound
and Clement be removed.�
Mayor Lockwood stated that First Avenue was designate�
as a collector street at the time it wes improved and
asked why it is proposed to stop collector street
traffic and make a residential street a through
street. He felt that it would be more appropriate tc
place stop signs on Clement Street.
Public Works Director Danielson stated that the inter
section is unique and presents a dif£icult problem.
He informed Council that he, the City Engineer and th�
County Traf£ic Engineer met at the site, and after
watching the traffic felt that the solution proposed
was the best recommendation because of the unusual
intersection con£iguration.
It was the concensus of the Council that First Av e
should remain a"through" street and that signs
indicating that cross tra££ic does not stop should be
installed on the stop sign posts. Staff was directed
BID AWARD, MENDOTA
C HEIGHTS ROAD
Ayes: 5
Nays: O
BUDGET/REVENUE
SHARING HEARING
Ayes: 5
Nays: O
Page No. 2336
September 3, 1985
to prepare a proposed ordinance to provide £or stop
signs on Clement at First Avenue and to submit the
proposed ordinance to Mr. Meyer for his comments.
Council acknowledged a memo and tabulation of bids
received for the upgrading of Mendote Heights Road
from Lexington Avenue to T.H. 55.
Councilmember Witt moved adoption o£ Resolution No.
85-65, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STREETS, CURB AND GUTTER
AND STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION ON MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD
BETWEEN LEXINGTON AVENUE AND TRUNK HIGHWAY 55
CIMPROVEMENT N0. 84, PROJECT N0. 6; M.S.A. PROJECT
NO. 104-103-06)," awarding the contract to Danner
Trucking, Inc., for their low bid of 5142,181.75.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Msyor Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpose of a
public hearing on the proposed 1986 budget and General
Revenue Sharing uses.
City Treasurer Shaughnessy stated that a 51,700,840
General Fund budget is proposed for 1986. He informed
Council and the audience that the City's 1986 General
Revenue Sharing entitlement will be 533,000, that it
is proposed that 510,500 of the entitlement be used
for election equipment acquisition and that the
balance be dedicated as capitol reserve. He pointed
out that this will be the £inal revenue sharing
entitlement period and informed the audience that the
City's revenue sharing allocations have always been
used for capitol pro�ects or capitol equipment: the
1985 entitlement was dedicated £or purchase o£ radios,
a park department truck and preparation of an
architect's study £or proposed City Hall: prior
entitlements were used to fund the Public Works Garage
construction fund de£icit.
Mayor Lockwood asked for questions and comments from
the audience.
There being no questions or comments, Councilmember
Witt moved that the hearing be closed at 8:15 P.M.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
It was the concensus of the Council that a budget
review workshop be conducted on September 11th at
7:00 P.M.
C
Page No. 2337
September 3. 1985
CASE N0. 85-21, Council ecknowledged an application from Eileen
O'ROURKE O'Rourke requesting approval of an application to
repeal a resolution adopted December 8, 1976 which
approved the subdivision of Lots 2, 3 and 4 of the
Furlong Addition.
Ayes: 5
Nays: O
Councilmember Cummins moved the adoption of Resolutior
No. 85-66, "RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION OF
LOTS 2, 3, AND 4, FURLONG ADDITION."
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
CASE NO. 85-17, Mr. George Span�ers and Mr. John Span�ers were preseni
SPANJERS to request approval of the division of Lot 7, Somerset
Hills Addition C1824 Valley Curve) into six lots.
George Span�ers asked £or preliminary plat approval
based on development of an agreement addressing
deferred assessments, utility extensions to proposed
lots 3 and 4, and park contribution. In response to e
question from Mayor Lockwood on whether Lot 5 is
buildable, Mr. Span�ers stated that Lots S and 6
consist o£ 17,500 and 15,500 square £eet. He stated
that while the Planning Commission expressed concern
that the lots would look congested, he does not tf k
that will be a problem.
Councilmember Blesener shared Planner Dahlgren's
£eeling that the lots are small in comparison to
others in Somerset Hills. Mr. Span�ers brie£ly
described the area and stated that hearing, notices
were sent to every property owner within 350 feet of
his property and no negative responses were received.
There was discussion over the buildability of Lots S
and 6, size of the lats in comparison to others in thE
area, collection o£ de£erred assessments, and locatior.�
of the rear lot lines of Lots 5 and 6(whether the
creek should be included within the lots or be the lot.
line).
After discussion, the mstter was continued to
September 17th and staff was directed to notify owners
i of property on Hilltop, Valley Curve, Elb Lane,
� Hilltop Court and Ridge Place.
CASE NO. 85-25,
HUI�TER
Dr. Steven Hunter was present to request approval of a
variance from the height restrictions of the Zoning
Ordinance to allow construction of a three story
residence, 28 £eet in height, on Lot 3, Block 1,
Hunter Blu£f. Dr. Hunter reviewed his house and siLe
plans for the Council.
Page No. 2338
September 3, 1985
Councilmember Cummins moved approval of a three
variance to the height requirement and one-story
variance £rom the three story height requirement
the Zoning Ordinance to allow construction of a
story, 28 foot hiqh residence on Lot 3, Block l,
Hunter Bluff Addition.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: O
foot
of
3-
CASE NO. 85-26, On the recommendation of the Planning Commission,
MCLEVISH Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of a 10 foot lot
width variance and three foot garage size variance to
allow construction of a residence and 437 squsre foot
garage on Lot 12, Block 2, Guadalupe Heights Addition.
Councilmember Cummins'seconded the motion.
Ayes: S
�ays: O
LEMAY LAKE FLOODING The Council scknowledged and discussed a memo from
Public Works Director Danielson regarding the level of
LeMay Lake.
BIKE TRAIL The Council acknowledged a memo from the Public Works
Director regarding sur£acing o£ the Curley Addition
bike trail. It was noted that quotes £or paving the
trail were received from Daily and Son for 51,125 and
from Ace Blactop for 51,227.
After discussion, Councilmember Cummins moved to
direct sta£f to pr�pare a purchase arder for bike
trail paving by Daily and Son £or �1,125, the cost to
be financed by the Special Park Fund.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: S
Nays: O
ZASPEL EASEMENT The Council acknowledged and discussed a memo £rom the
Public Works Director informing Council that Mr. &
, Mrs. Noel Zespel, 1792 Ridgewood,Drive, have submitted
an easement document which will allow City staf£ to
enter their property to complete corrective grading
and filling work to con£ine drainage £rom the City's
storm water pipe to within the essement area.
Mrs. Zaspel, present for the discussion, stated that
even if Mr. Kra�niak executes the court-ordered
easement, the City can still accomplish the drainage
correction on her property rather than the Kra�niak,
whichever is best.
After discussion, Councilmember Cummins moved to
Ayes: S
� Nays: O
�
Page No. 2339
September 3, 1985
suthorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the
easement and to direct staff to complete the grading
end filling as necessary.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
PARK STUDY Councilmember Witt moved to authorize the Mayor and
City Clerk to execute an agreement with Barton-Aschman
Asaociates, Inc. £or preparation of the Mendota
Heights Park and Recreation Facility Planning Pro�ect.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: O
NSP ELECTRIC RATE The Council acknowledged and discussed a memo £rom the
INCREASE City Administrator regarding a letter from St. Paul
Councilman William Wilson concerning a request from
NSP £or an electric rate increase and suggesting that
Mendota Heights participate in a consortium o£ cities
�oining to intervene in the electric rate case.
It was th� concensus that the City does not wish t�
participate. Mayor Lockwood stated that he would
reapond to the letter.
FAIR LABOR STANDARDS The Council acknowledged a League o£ Minnesota Cities
ACT Action Alert and a memo £rom the City Administrator
regarding the Fair Labor Standards Act and its impact
on overtime compensation.
Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No.
85- 67, "RESOLUTION URGING LEGISLATIVE SUPPORT FOR
SENATE FILE 1570."
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: O
COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Blesener indicated that she has received
two more citizen contacts expressing cor�ern over bike
trail safety at Lexington and Marie.
Councilmember Cummins asked that the City Attorney's
office prepere an opinion on what implications
Comprehensive Plan revisions would have on £uture
rezoning requests in the Southeast area. ,
ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the
Council, Councilmember Hartmann moved that the meeting
Page No. 2340
September 3, 1985
be ad�ourned to a closed session for discussion on
negotiations for acquisition of the Wachtler and
Kirchner properties.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: O
C TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:59 o'clock P.M.
----------------------------------
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
ATTEST:
----------------------------------
Robert G. Lockwood
Mayor
A M�JU NT
'� 9/3/85 CLAIMS LIST � /�� � 15-Fngr
�, 2�-Police
CH�CK REGi T�R 30-Fire
4�J-C�0
V=NDO� ITEM DESCRIPTION
16.80 AMFRICAN R�D CROSS CPR 80CKS/TEST
16.£3D +✓
28.24
28.24 */
257.Si�
257.50 *,/
14.9�
14.97 *,/
210.�10
21�.�Q �
44 .Z 3
44.23 *�
17R.�0
178,�0 *✓
2b.fi5
51 .5 S
51.55
26.b5
51 .50
26.?0
z34.6d +►�
191.3�J
35.�7
227.1 T #/
6b.42
b6.4 2 +s/
SO.JC!
40.6�
zs�.00
37�._'0 */
31,8'l3.67 /
31 ,813.�i0 */
4.35
4.35
4.35
4.35
4.49
4.35
26.Z4 *�
� T8.]0
7R.J0 * �
693.46
A�ERI CA N T OUL SPLY
CLAREYS S�FETY EB
CnMPUT�°R S�iQPP�R
HEiUNERIN �TY Mw0 ��(
ALEK�yDEF �F6 CO
CHRIS KLEIN�CK
NARDINi FI��E �0
NAROINr FI RE t�
NAROI�JI �iRE EQ
NARDIN� FIRE �Q
NARDI NI FI RE EQ
PJAR�INI FIRE �Q
GiRAI,D N�LS ON
GERALD 'VFLSON
ROAD R�!SC�E I NC
SCHAA�' CONML LAYN
SCHAAF CO,MM� IAWN
SC HA 4 F C04ML L� WN
ALIiFD Bl.4CK70P
ST4TE AGCr RtV FUND
STATE AGCr R�U FUNO
STATF AGCr REV FU!VO
STATE AGCY RF U FUNO
STAT� AGCY REV FU�VD
STATE A GCIf RE U F UND
SCHAAK �L�CTRONIC
SCHERFF I!VC
SHOP TOOLS ftFR
FIRE SUSPENDERS
12 ISSUES
REGR FORE�SIC SEM
BAT TERY
JUL SVC
KIDDc A9C
MTCN/INSP FIRE EXT
MTCNlINS� FSRE EXT
KIDO�' A8C
MTCN/IlVSP� FIRE Ei(T
KIODE ABC
S7 FIRE CCN�
FiI �IRE CCNV
R�'�J MAX BcAM
WEED CUTTING
uEED CUTTIkG
NE=D CUTTIN6
1985SEA� COAT
ADM IN FEE
ADMIN FEE
ADMIN FL�
ADMiN F�E
ADMIN FEE
ADMIN FEE
COMP SPLY�
RPR SVC b71 APACHE
--C- __ ___- _��_O_
60-Utilities
70-Parks
80-Planning
90-Animal Contro]
ACCOUMT N�. iNY.
01�4305-030-30 9
01-4330-490-70 8
12-4630-000-00 2
01-4402-110-10
�1•4400-020-20
01-4305-020-20 1
01-4335-315•30
01-4305-050-50 1
C1-4305-050-5� 1
0'! •4305-070• 70 1
01-4305-070- 70 1
15-4 305- 060- 60 1
15-4305-�60-60 1
Oi-440fl-G30-30
01-4415-030-30
01-4330-460-3�J 9
L�1-4490-040-4D 9
�11••4490-04fl-40 9
01-4490•040-40 9
0'1-4423-050-50
01-4135-040-40
01-4135-050-50
01-4135-�70-7Q
01�4135-110-10
OS-4135-105-15
15-41 35-060- 6tl
01-4300-020-20 5
35-4460-910-00
CHECK REGIST�R
:�MOUNT V�"NDO� ITEM DESCRIPTION
693.46 *�
1,74�3.SU LO�RIf �1IL�ROTH
1•74C.50 *i
111.�3 INR�OVAT�IV=PUBL C�
111.�3 *�
20.�0 M�J O�JT
Z J . '? 1� *,� . .
136.30 1ST TRUST ST PAUL
132.J4 1ST T�UST ST PAUL
204.�3 1ST TRUST S7 PAUL
2�4.;;3 1S7 Tr�UST ST PAUL
b76.40 4 i
53.fi3
53.63 *i
1,194.�0
2,328."0
3,522.]0 */
26 . R3
26.83 */
268. � 8
7.89
36.40
312.47 */
1Z.75
72.75
15.'!0
9.2R-
46.1 5
22.80
12.73
7�.26
1 �3.1 6 R /
AIR ;.OMM INC
ARN�'SON FU�L OIl SVC
ARNES'JN FUEL OIL SVC
B&J AUT�p SPLY
BD WAT�R �3MMISSIUN
BO WAT_IR COMMISSION
BD YAT�R C�MMISSION
CITY MOT02 SUPPL1f
CI TY t�10T0� SUPPLY
CITY +�f3T0� SUPPLY
CITY MOTQR SUPPLY
CIT�f �10T03 SUPPL1f
CTTlf MOTO� SUPPLtf
CITY MOTD? SU�'PLIf
CIT'l MDTQR SU?P�Y
R� SNR 571 AFACHE
RPT 41RITIh&
MANUALS
ISSUE Fc�
ISSU� F£E
ISSUE FE�'
ISSUE FEr
aiG �IA62231
!VO l�aD
R�GULAR
PARTS404
JUL SVC
JUL SVC
JUN �NGR
FLOR DRI
FI�OR DRI
PAR TS
RTN
�AR TS
PAR TS
FLOR DRI
BATTERY/CABLES
12�•22 COPY EOU�a CO MISC SPLYS
ACCOUNT N0. i�l'�
35-4460-910-00
Q1-4402-020-20 '�
05-44Q2�1i75-15
16-4226-000-00 �
72-4226-00�-00 �
75-4226—$1 2-00 .!
75-4226-821-00 e�
01-4330-490-20 '
01-1210-000—Oa �
O1—i 210-000—"'� d
15�4330�490-60 �
�1-4425-315-3C
15-4425-310—bt7
87-4231-812-00 M
�31-4305-OSO-50 i
01-4305-07Q-70 1
01-4330-440-2�J 1
01•4330-490-SO 1
01-4330-490-50 1
01-4330-490-5G 1
15-4305-060-60 9
95-4330-490-6Q 1
QS-43G0-105-15 7
CH�CK REGIST�R
AMOUNT V=N00� ITEM DESCRIPTiON
1 2'? . 2 2 *�
65.1 6 DAtiLGRENSiAROLOb�UBAN R� HOUSI NG EL�M
7 �242.�0 DA4iLGRENSyARDl�yt1RAN JUL RETAINER
'1,3t?8.15 */
3,S.�Q DAVZS �L�CiR��l:C SVC
27.25 OAVIS ELECTRONZC SVC
63.25 */
905.�'� OCR C�RP.
9L�5.;�� */
132.31
66.' 9
�98.53 *i
.
t;p�,i�7
°OC'. �:� *�
4.92
]7.�0
13.?3
5.15
3.90
3.�8
41.TR */
253.b7
253.67 */
222. �6
?69.5�3
4 92 . ?_ 6 *.i
ICMA ?C
ICMA RC
KA IS^R PA:1�
tCNUTN TOM
KNUTH TOM
KNUTH TOM
KNUTH TOM
KNUTH TOM
KNUTH TOM
KOKESH SU�?LIES
IAKELQ�D = ORO
LAKELAND r OR�J
PARTS
R�RR/PARTS
SE�T RENT
8!i bPAYROLL
811 bP�,1fRDlL
AU6 SVC
MI THr�U 8/27
SEPT ALLOii
MI TtiRU 8 /28
MI TMRU $JZT
�1I THRU 8 /27
HI Ttit2U B 12T
RECR SPLYS
RPRSZ293
RPRS2287
ACC�UNT N0. INV.
01-4220-135-80
�1-4221-135-80
01-4330-450-30 �
0'1-433a-450•30 �
01-4200-640-20
01-2072-ODD-�0
01- 41 34-11 0-'10
01-4268-150-30
Q5-4415-105-15
OS-44'15-105-1 S
10-4415-000-00
84-4415-809-00
90-4415-81 S-��
97-44i 5-825-GO
�1-4435-200-7�J 6
01-4330-460-30 3
01-4330-460-3t7 3
4.�5- LAr.GULA' N�NE JULY OISC 01-4305-030-30
- 21.:�4 LANGULA� N�u� P�INT BRUSHES 01-4305-030-30 1
25.h2 LA�GUTA• H�J41E HOS� NO2ZLE 01-4305-030-30 9
42.?� */
AMOUNT
1 53.��0
i53.�� *�
32.32
30J.^'�
64.35
396.6� *./
.65
�.35
1�J.95
2.90
5.63
8�.4�
2.35
32.5[i
2C�.85
z.45
Z.ZS
4.�0
'17 3 . 3 £� *�
Z3.�5
2�.75 *�
�33.33-
3•786.75
22•227.65
2 �� 83. 33-
23,n9T.74 *�
1•295.��
1 , 295.::0 * j
1 8. ?fl
3.40
3.40
1 .70
1.70
5.1 0
34.�0 * /
V=NOJ�
L� lS
CHECK RE�iST�R
l"�CIT HP �LA►V
LMCIT HP 'L�N
LMCIT WP 'Li4V
?�gW INC C4�lONPROD
M&W INC C4NON�it00
MgW ItJC Cr�NO�VPR�D
Mbw INC Co.NON�kOD
MB�M INC CANONPROD
M&W IVC CA�VONPKOD
M&�I INC CA110NP�;00
M&W INC C4NONPiiO�
H&i� I NC CR NOVPR �D
M&ii INC C�NONP�OD
M&W INC CANONPROD
M&W INC CQNCi(UPRa7
MEND HGTS RUSBISN
M=TRO yASTE CO*lTRi�L
M�TRO YAST� CONTROL
M= TRO WASTE C��NTROL
M=TR3 yAST= �ONTROL
MINN MrtVIN�&MFG
�1INN MUTUAL LIF�
MiNM MUTU4� LIFE
NIiUN MUTUAL LIFE
MIrJrV MUTUaL LIFE
NINN '�UTUCL LIFE
MINN MUTUa L LIFE
ITEM DESCRIPTION
SEP T DUE S
S�PT PREM
S�P T PR= �
SEPT �REM
JUL COPT�SIMTCN
JUL COPIES/�TCN
Jl1L COPIE�JMTCN
JUL COPZES/MTCN
JUL C�PIESlMTCN
JUL COP7ESlMTCN
SHPG TONEF
JUL COPIESIMTCN
JUL COPItS/HTCN
JUL COPiES/MTCN
JUL CO�ItSlMTCN
JUL CUPI�S/MTCN
JUL SVC
SEPT IhS'A��
AU6 SAC CIiES
S�.PTINSTALL
S�PT INSTALL
OPTICOM �PITT�R
SEP T PRE M
SEP T �'RE M
SEPT PREM
��PT �R"cM
ScPT PRE!�!
s�Qr PR�r+
ACCOUNT N0. IP�V
01-2075-000-00
Oi-2074-000-Ofl
0'1-4131-020-20
C�1-4131-021-20
01-4268-650-10
01-4300-03U-3�
01-4300-040-44
a��4..1Oa05L�5O
01-4300-080-80
01-43Q0-110-10
�J1-4300�1'! 0•1 J
01-4305-020•20
OS-43U0-105-15
07-4300-000-00
10-430Q-000—�U
Z3-4300-000
D1-4280-315-30
14-3575-000-00
15-4448-060-b0
15-4449—D60-60
17-3575-0�0-00
12-4620-000-00
01-2074—D00-00
41-4131-020-20
0'1-4131-021-20 ,
01-4131—O50—S�
�1-41 31-07t' '1
fl1-4131-11G J
q M�U NT
.
319.69
6.55
27 .41
34T.65 * /"
?7?.50
115.8$
33. �i4
78.99
29Q.� S
59 .39
SR.64
8�J'I .'t 9 */
3�J5 .�0
17^.]0
475.'?0 */
��,859.J6
,859.J6 *✓
584.70
584.:;0 *.�
8.4U
R.4t� +► /
13n.99
4?F,GO
608,Q9 *i
134.53
7?.t'D
2�4.53 +/
29.7l1
7 . '! 2
98.61
135.33 *,
CHFCK PEGISTER
WENDO� ITEM DESCi�I�'TIDN
i
NORT!i�RN ST POa�cR CO AUG SNC
NORTNEPN ST POU�R CO AU6 �VC
NORTHERN St� P�N�R CO AUG SVC
N�pTH1JEST=RN R:LL
NnRT�IWE'ST_�N B�LL
N�RTH�iESTc:r�N B�LL
NORTHaFST�RN S�LL
NC��?THWEST=RN 8= Ll
NOftTHt�EST=RN 8ELL
Nf�i2TH�JEST�RN B�'LL
OAK CREST KE'VNELS
OAK C�EST KEN�;ELS
�JP.�EI 8� SJVS ?�UC
�S�IALD FI?E FiOSE
flxYGE^a SERUiCE C�
�irlE B=NQ PAVI'�G INC
�iNE B=ND pA11IRG INC
PRUDENTIAL
FRUD�NTIAL
S&T OFFIC= PROD
S�T �FF?C= PROD
S&T QFFIC� P� OD
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
01-4217-300-50
01-4211-315-30
D1-4212-315-30
4UG SVC 01-4210-020-20
AU SUC Q1-4210-030-30
AU6 SVC 01-4210-050-50
AUG SVC 01-4210-070-70
AUG SVC 01�4210�110•1�
AU6 SVC �5-4210-105-15
AU6 SUC 15-421�-06D-60
JULY r2ET/CALLS 01-4221-800-9Q
JULY R£T/CALi.S 01-4225-800-9Q
PrMT 1 �5-1
H�iSc REPAiR
D£MU�RAG� THRU 7/15
FZN� �Zx
�iEA ft1FINE NI X
SEPT PREM
SEPT PREM
MISC SFLYS
MISC SPIY�
MISC SP�.1fS
9T-4460-825-00
Q1-4330-460-30 75
01-4305-030-30 2'_
Q1-4422-050-50 3C
01-4422-050-50 31
�1-2074-000-DQ 4E
01-4131-020-20 4f
�1-4340-020- 20 P7
01-4300•110-10 P7
05-4300-105-15 P7
AMOUNT
40.�J
40.'30 * /
1 �166.�0
8C.�0
103.��J
�49.00
210.'?C
254,'�D
16�.�0
2 � �S[3.�.3 */
6.54
6.54 */
1,974.67
1 �4i1.54
537.29
18.16
46.35
168.5fi
91.34
136,9�+
22$.QD
24.R2
4 �63�3.55 �/
21.SD
21 . 5 Q */
6.��
6.3!� */
�i2.�^
R2 .J 0 +�
6.J2
6.� 2
6.�1
18.G5 * /
CWEClc REGIST::R
V=NDO�
SElA11�=�R JUAN� C
SH�UGNNESS1f L E JR
SHAUSWNESSY L � JP.
SHMUvH�1fESSY L F JR
SNAll�HVESSY L E Jit
SHAUGHNESSIf � E JR
SNAU�NNESSY l E JR
SHAUGHNESSY L E JR
SNYDER ORJG STORES
STATE TREA� °ERA
STAT_ TR��S P�R�
STA7E TRE4S PERA
STpTE TREA� PERA
ST�"TE TR�"•S P��A
STAT� TRE9S PE!?A
STAT� TRE�S PERA
STAT� TREqS PERA
STAT� TRE�S PERA
STAT� TR�3S PE�A
STRcICiiER DOfV GUNS
U'VIFOf?MS �NLiMZTED
U,�ZTED :IA1�-ST PAUL
AT 8 T INFD SYSTEt4S
AT g T INFO SY�TEHS
A� & T IMFD SrSTEMS
ZTEM OESCRIPTION
SEP� ALLOu
AUG S VC
A116 SHC
AU� SVC
AUG SVC
AUG SVC
AUG SUC
AU5 SVC
MZSC SPLYS
8/1b PAYRCLL
�it bPar� ct�
E3/16 PAYRilLt
8/16 PA1fR�LL
8/16 ?AYRCLL
8l16 PAYRCLL
8/16 pArR�LL
d/16 PAYr�OIL
8J16 PAYRCLL
8/1 b PAYRCLL
BARREL BARDS
�:C KS
SEPT CONTR
AUG SVC
AU6 SVC
AUG SVC
ACCOUNT N0. I�
01�4475-20.
01-4220-132-'! G
03-4220•132-QO
05-4220-132-15
14-4220-132-0�
15-4220-132-6C
1b-4220-132-00
21-4220-132-0�
15-43�5-D60-60
01-20b2-ODO-O�
01-4134-020-20
01-4134-021-20
fl1-4134-03�-30
01-41 34-0� D
01-4134-OSu-50
01-41 34-070-70
']1-41 34�11 0-1 (J
05-41 34-105-1 S
15-4734-060-bU
01-4305-020-20
01-4410-020-2�7
t�1-2D70-OOfl-00
01-4210-0� 50
:'�1-4210-0� TO
15-4210-060-60
,MOUNT
7.F39
7.gq */
58.:� 3
5 8 .'J 3 */
32 .1 6
6t?.�D
67.�10
29.91
41 .91
ZZ3.98 �„�
1,601.'?0
1 ,664.�0
3,2.h5.J0 *�
� Zv •`�n
127.�� *�
175.�t?
175.�0 :/
7.�39
7.89 +�
52,99�.55
R0.`�0
2�334.38
2.45
15.98
1 ,S 52 . Si3
'15.b7
26 �SO�.b7
39�.3�
- �� 83.33-
6$.�J
4.10
2.433.96
CHECK REGISTFR
V=NDO? ITEM DESCRIPTION
BD uATc:R �;1MMISSION
CITIf MOTO� SUPPLY
DAWIS c�LEC7RONIC SVC
DAUiS ELE�TROr�IC SVC
DAVIS EL��TRONIC SvC
�AVIS =LE;.TRONIC SUC
DAVIS �tLE�TR��JIC SVC
DCR � C1�P.
DCR �ORP.
D�NNIS D�LMONT
FR,�Z�LL K_VIN
BO WA��R ��MMISSIO%f
FUND 01 TpTAL
FUN� ^3 TOTAL
FU"JD CS TOTe.L
�UyO �37 TOTAL
FUND 10 TUTAL
FUND 12 TOTA�
FUND 14 TOTAL
FUVD 15 TOTAL
FUyO 16 TOTAL
FUND 17 TOTeL
FUyD 21 TOTp�
FU�10 23 TOTAL
FUUD 35 TOTAL
JUL SVC
PARTS
RPR/PARTS
BATTcRI�S
BAT TEr�I£ S
RPR /Pqt�TS
RPRIPARTS
S�PT REhT
SFpT RENT
SEPT ALL�N
S�PT ALLO�
JUL SYC
GENcRAL FUND
VATER REYENUE FUN�
ENGR �.NTERPRISE
CIVIL DEFENSE
SPECIAL PARK FUND
�OUIPMENT CERTIFICAT�S
CONSOLiDATED DEBT SERVIC
SEutR UTIIIi'Y
TID I79-7/81-4/82-7/82-6
UTIL RESEFV�
INDUSTRIAL OEVELOPMENT
CAB�� TV FRAtVCHISE
I7T-6/9f10/12/78-2
ACCOUNT NO• INY.
01�4425-310-50
i3'1-4330-440- 20 18
01-4330-450-30 27
fl1-4330-450-30 27
01�4330-450-3� 27
01-4330- 450-30 27
01-4330-450- 30 27
D1-42f30-600-1 Q
OS-4 200- 600-1 5
0'l-4415-021-20
01-4415-110-1Q
�'1-4425-310-70
� ►�OUNT
't 32,OG
40-8.J 6
6.1 5
36. 4 D
3.9Q
12r�62.14
4T�s�53,92
CHECK REGIST=R
V�:NDO�
FU�fD 72 TOiA�
fUN� 75 TOtAL
FU�tO �?4 TOTAL
FUND 87 TOTAL
�UN� 9n TOTAL
FUNli 97 T�OtAL
TOT�i�
MANUAL CEiECKS
10$50
I0851
10$52
10853
10854
10855
10856
10857
G.T.
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOt7NT N0. INV�
i81 •6/$1-7/81-$
I�33•17UM#�UATERLANEADDN
I33-4/$3-48 6RY'C/DAK CTY
I83-7B NN RD MN QC??
I$5-1 ANOER/CURLEY
4,108.03 Commissioner REvenue 8/2&8/b6 W/H
2,667.44 St Treas SS Fund $/I6 FZCA
4,868.56 Director Infernal Rev 8/16 FIT
20Q.40 DC Bank 8j16 Payrall Deciuctions
1,481.26 SCCU "
265.00 De*�tan Nerison �emg help P.W: $/15-23
24,117.27 City M.H. Payroll Acct 8/16 Paqrol].
500.Q0 U. S. P�st Ofc. Ref ill postage meter
38,207.56
3.36, 061.4$
; C['I'Y UF MI:NIX)"I'A Ili:l(;II'I'S
'I'KF:ASURI:R'S NI:I'UR'I' - August, 1985
L. SIIAUCIINI:SSY
, UnKU'I'n c;OUN�I'Y S'I'n"fL I.nN�
I Checking Accc�unC
,
Savings Account
' C.D. Uue
i Savings Cer�i[ic.�ces 9-25-�i5 !+ �i.�iG'7..
� 'fU'fAL
Coll.ateral - I�onds
, Cov't Cuar.
CIIFRUKE(: STATE (3A!�'K
; C.D. due 10-7 -HS @ 6. 787
, C. D. due 11-2-�5 (� 8.147
,' Savings Cert. 9-3-85@ 107
� TOTn L
fi'lUU,UUU
l OU , UOU
300,000.00
125,ODU.UU
13,952.59
438,952.59
' Collateral-I3onds 1,5UU,ODU.UO
; Cov'L Cuar. 1OU,OOU.UU
U.S. 'fREnSURY [3ILL.S
�,�; Uue 3-20-8G S69U,U(?O(ti�t) ( IU.GU)
.< 9-12-85 3�0,000O ( ls�) (9.85)
10-31-85 �25,000 (Dk)
Collateral-f3onds
• Gov't Guar.
� MINNESOTA STATf: BANK
C.D. Due
Collateral, Cov't. Guar.
h1INNESOTA FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN
- EIRST NATIONA[. E3ANK OF ST. PAUL
', C.D. Due
Co11��tcral-l3�nds
Cov'e. Gu�ir.
kcpo.
0
�tin�.nnc:�;
5161,121.85
394.77
25,UUU.U��
5186,516.62
S625,884.43
283,082.85
SU3,76G.G7
TO"CAL FUN[)S AVAILA13Lf;: � 2,038,203.16
c:�n.i.��'�'i�:itn �.
S 3UU , Ur�(1
1,6UU,000
. '
�
-�.,� ,
.. �
CITY OF MGNDOTA HEIGHTS
MEM4
�
' T0: Planning Commission
FROM: James E. Danielson and Paul R. Berg
Pub3ic Works DirecCor Code Enforcement Officer
SUBJECT: Case Na. $g-21, 0'Rourke, Repeal of Subdivision for Lots 2, 3, and 4,
Block 3, Furlang Addition
DISCUSSION
In 197b, Council granted a subdivision ta the abave referenced property.
Applicant now desires to rescind the previous subdivision appraval so that the
•• easterly 60 foot lot can be sald ta Mr. Robert.Tausignant, Mr. Tousignant had
�:�
'`�: inadvertentlp constructed a portion of his driveway on that easterly lot. (See
� attached statement by applicant).
ACTION REQUIRED
iReview proposed subdivision, while conducting a public hearing, and make a
rec�ammendatian ta the City Cauncil,
�'r' �
:.,
i
I
JED%PRB:madlr
r • ' ,
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APFLICAI�T :
LOCATIGN:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
ACA�U1iA PAIiK
�
�� �p,�
27 August 1985
85-21
Eileen F. 0'Rourke
Sauth af Furlong Avenue,
Easterl.y af Trunk Highway
55 {see sketeh}
Reseinding of Previaus Lot
Division
In 1976, the City P].anning Commission and Couneil approved
the division af an area of land known as Lots 2, 3, and 4,
Furlong Addition, south of �'urlong Avenue, for the
0`Rourke's. Sinee that time, it was discavered that a
portion of` the driveway serving the contiguaus property (Lot
1) encroaehes on one of the lots ereated in the previous�y
approved subdivision. The problem has been solved by a
propased transfer af Lot 2 to the awner af Lat 1.
At this time, the applicant propases to leave the remainder
o�' the Iand as a sing2e parcel. Therefore, the appropriate
aetion is to reseind.the action of the Planning Commission
and Council aecomplished in 1976 tPlanning Case Number
76-31). The remaining pareel will thus be available and
huildabla as a single family hame site. It appears that the
remaining buildable lot will have a frontage af 120 feet,
being Lots 3 and �. :
Attaehed are eQpies of the former subdivision indicating the
previous division of Lots 2, 3, and 4 into Pareels A and B.
e
i -- _— ��/"�-.r.f �
- i-�=_ ��C��c�
_ i
t I
' 1 I
�
� r"" _
1 �„ri � �-
• � ��, ;., � �""'
\ '-.r / . �
R� un `�,iaN
� ��
. __�__ :: �� _
� ceM reRr
UBJECT R
CA�E- r�"-
�
��
�
�
0
1
;�:
I CITY OF ME[dDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: James E. Danielson and Paul R. Berg
Public Works Director Code Enforcement Officer
SUBJECT: Case No. 85-25, Hunter, Variance to Principal Structure Height in R-1 Zone
DISCUSSION
Dr. Steven Hunter proposes to build a new home on Lot 3, Block l, Hunter
Bluff, located at 1175 Orchard Place. He ha� had his house plans developed by Neil
Anderson and Associates, of River Falls, WI. Mr. Hunter submitted his plan for staff
f; review and comments in preparation for acquiring a building permit. Staff noted that
" the elevation drawings demonstrated a three story building and advised him that the
R-1 zoning ].imits construction to two stories or 25 �feet in height.
Mr. Hunter has submitted a statement regarding his situat•ion. (See attach�d).
ACTION REQUIRED
` Review the nature of his variance request and make a recommendation to the City
Council._ �
�; ' .
JED/PRB:madlr
.s �
�: .
�2?
�
AGREEMEM
BETWEEN THE CITY OF MENC30TA HEIGHTS
AND BARTQN-ASCNMAN ASSOCIATES, iNC.
FOR PARK AND RECREATION FACILITY PLAN�QNG
TNIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day af , ,
by and between the CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, hereinafter referred ta as the
CITY and BARTCIN-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INCCIRPQRATED, a Minnesota
corporation with a regular place of business at 161Q South Sixth Street,
Minneapolis, MN 55454, hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTRNT.
WITNE5SETH:
; That the CITY and the CONSULTANT, for the consideration hereinafter named,
agree as follows.
ARTICLE l. GENERAL DE5CRIPTION tJF WORK TO BE DONE
That the CITY agrees to and hereby does retain and employ the CONSULTANT a�d
the CONSULTAt�IT agrees to perform Professional Services as hereinafter
described for the project, entitled Mendota Heic,�hts Park and Recreation Facility
� PianninA, hereinafter referred to as ihe PRCIJECT and more particularly described
'�, in attached Exhibit A, a part hereof.
, The CONSULTANT hereby agrees ta retain and employ Mary Ellen Ordal to
. , perform certain portions of the praject pursuant to the terms af the proposal
� , presented ta the CITY. No additional subconsultants ar assignment of
�`•�^ ; : responsibilities will occur pursuant to the terms of Article 10 of this agreement.
. ` ' ARTICLE 2. MEETINGS /�/�`"� -�
.► '�'�tJ� ,
' The CONSULTANT will attend and conduct up to four meetings wiih the CITY's
., ; Park Corr�mission. The CONSULTANT will also participate in periodic infarmal
�: � meetings with the CITY staff. Additional meeting attendance and participation
i ; can be initiated by the CL.IENT and wil! be determined to be additiona! services
� billed on a time and expenses basis incurred by the CONSUl.TANT.
� �
ARTIC�E 3. TIME F�R COMPLETION
The CONSULTANT agrees ihat work under this Agreement will begin wiihin 7
calendar days after receipt of Authorization to Praceed. The term of the
Agreemeni far the perfarmance of services hereunder shall be 120 days for Tasks
1-6 follawing the date of Ruthorizatian to Proce d. It is agreed that the "not to
exceed" payment figure sei #orLh in Article ��'herein has been established in
anticipation af an orderly and continuaus progress af the PR0,3ECT for 7.20
consecutive deys through completion of the work.
� ARTIC�E 4. COMPENSATION TO THE CONSULTANT
�
4.10 The CITY shall pay to the CONSULTANT for services performed in
aecordance with this Agreement as fallows:
4.10.1 Peyment to the CONSULTANT for services described in Exhibit A of this
Agreement shall be on the hourly rate basis for the hours actually spent thereon for
the persons in the following classifications at the following ranges in hourly rates.
These rates include compensation for all salary costs, payroll burden, general and
administrative overhead and professional fee.
Classification
Principal Associate
Senior Associate
Associates
Senior Designers and Senior Technicians
�esigner ,�ec nic� s, and G eric4��
Periodic revisions to the above rates shall be
the CITY.
Hourly Billinq Rates
$65.00 to $90.00
$40.00 to $70.00
$33.00 to $60.00
$20.00 to $45.00
$15.00 to �33.00
� �S. oo t� 3s, o0
submitted by the CONSULTANT to
4.10.2 The CONSULTANT shall also be reimbursed at cost for the following Direct
Expenses when incurred in the performance of the work:
1. Computer services
2. Outside professional and technical services
3. Identifiable reproduction costs
4. CONSULTANT travel expenses
4.10.3 The CITY shall make monthly payments to the CONSULTANT within 30
days of date of invoice based on computations made in accordance with the above
charges for services provided and expenses incurred to date, accompanied by
supporting evidence as required. All accounts unpaid after 30 days from the date
of original invoice shall be subject to a service charge of 1% per month.
4.10.4 Payment to the CONSULTANT for services set forth in Exhibit A of this
� Agreement, shall not exceed $19,100, unless mutually changed by Supplemental
Agreement for extra work or changed conditions. Additionally, in the event that
�services are provided by the CONSULTANT beyond the contract completion date
as a result of circumstances beyond the control of the CONSULTANT, the "not to
exceed" payment figure shall be subject to an upward adjustment established by
Supplemental agreement pursuant to the provisions of Article 5.
ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES AND SERVICES NOT INCLUDED IN THIS
CONTRACT
If the CONSULTANT is of the opinion that any work they have been directed to
perform is beyond the Scope of this Agreement, or that the level of effort required
significantly exceeds that estimated due to changed conditions and thereby
constitutes extra work, they shall promptly notify the CITY of that fact. Extra
work, additional compensation for same, and extension of time for completion shall
be covered by a Supplemental Agreement mutually agreed upon by both parties
prior to proceeding with any extra work or related expenditures. �
ARTICLE 6. DOCUMENTS FORMING THE CONTRACT
The contract documents shall be deemed to include this Agreement with all
accompanying exhibits as part hereof.
ARTICLE 7. ABANDONMENT, CHANGE OF PLAN AND TERMINATICIN
Either Party has the right to terminate this Agreement upon seven days written
notice, In addition, the CITY may at any time redues ihe scape of this Agrsement.
Such reductian in scope shail be set forth in a written notice from the CITY to the
CONSULTANT. In the event of unresolved dispute over change in scope or changed
conditions, this agreement may also be terminated.
In ihe event of terminatior�, ail documenis finished or unfinished, prepared by the
CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall be made available by the CONSULTANT
ta the CITY pursuant to Article 8, and there shail be no further obligatiQn of the
CITY ta the CONSULTANT under this Agreement, except far payment of amounts
due and owing for work performed and expenses i�curred to the date and time of
termination, computed in accordance with Article 4.
In the event of a reduction in scope af the Projeet wark, the Consultant shall be
paid for the work performed and expenses incurred on the project wark thus
� reduced or on any completed and abandoned work, camputed in accordance with
Article 4. Any reduction in the "not to exceed" payment figure shall be established
� , by a Supplemental Agreeme�tt entered into by both parties.
� ARTICLE 8. DISPOSITIC7N OF PLAN, REPORTS AND OTHER DATA
At the time af completion ar termination of the wark, the COI�ISULTANT shall
make available ta the CITY aIl maps, tracings, reparts, resaurce materials and
other dacuments pertaining to the work or io the PROJECT. All such documents
are not intended or represenied to be st�iiable for reuse by the CITY or others on
extensions of the PROJECT or any other project. Any such reuse without written
verification or adaptation by the GONSULTANT for the specific purpose inkended
will be at the CITY's sole risk and without liability ar Iegal exposure to the
CONSULTANT.
ARTIC�E 9. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIE�
' �,. 9.10 Ta permit the CONSULTANT to perform the services required hereunder, the
�'�''` CITY shall supply, in praper time and seguence, the foliowirtg at no expense to the
CONSUL.TANT.
9.10.I Provide all necessary infarmation regarding its requirements as necessary
for orderly progress of the work. All known requirements are set forth in Exhibit
A.
9.10.2 Designate in writing a person to act as CITY's representative with respect
to the services ta be rendered under this Agreement. Such persnn shall tiave
authority to transmit instructions, receive instructions, receive information, and
interpret and define CITY's palicies with respect to the CONSULTANT'S services.
9.10.3 Furnish, as required for performance af the CDi�iSUL.TANT services {except
to the extent provided otherwise in EXHIBIT A), existing data prepared by or
services of others, including existing background infarmation such as base mapping,
topography, soils, plat mapping, parcel characteristics, ownership, traffic patterns,
utility mapping and sizing, cammunity planning and demagraphic data which ihe
CITY has privilege to.
9.10.4 Provide access to and make all provisions for the CONSUL7ANT to enier
upan publicly owned property as requireci to perform the wark.
9,10.5 Rct as liaisan with other agencies to carry out necsssary coordination and
negotiations.
9.10.b Examine all reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, and other
documents prepared and presented by the CONSULTANT, obtain advice of an
attorney, insura�ce counselor or others as the CITY deems necessary for such
examination, and render in writing, decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable
time sa as noi to delay the services of ihe CClNSU�TANT.
9.10.7 Give prampt written notice to the CONSULTANT whenever CITY abserves
or otherwise b�comes aware af any deveiopment that affects the scope of timing
of the CONSULTANT'S services or any defect in the work of the CON5ULTANT.
,�..
9.10.8 Transmit task summary memorandums in a three ring nateboak format for
the appainted Park Commission and invoived sta#f inembers.
9.10.9 Provide a meeting place and notification for meetings described in Exhibit
A.
9.10.10 Provide ather services, materisis, or data as may be sei forth in EXHIBIT
A.
9.12 The CONSULTANT shall be entitled ta rely on the accuracy and completeness
of infarmation furnished by the CITY. If the CC�NSUl.TANT finds thai any
information furnished by the CITY is in errar or is inadequate for its purpase, the
CONSULTANT shall pramptly notify the CITY.
ARTICLE 10. ASSIGNMENT
This Agreement, being intended to secure the personal service of the individuals
employed by and through whom the CONSULTANT performs work hereunder, shall
nat be assigned, sublet or transferred, except to the above designated
subconsuliant, without the written cansent of the CITY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day
and year first above written. ,
CITY UF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN BARTON-ASCHMAN ASStaCIATES, INC.
By. By. � !'/� /��"/,i'_'-_..-
� -
,
By: ey: ..`
r.
ATTEST:
EXHIBIT A
PHASE I FACILITY IVEEDS ASSESSMENT
TASK 1: REVIEW COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS AND BACKGRQUVD
INFORMATION
Objective: To research and document projected Mendota Heights' growth trends
', and demographics
Discussion: Mendota Heights has witnessed significant growth in the past two
decades. In fact, the community has grown over 15 percent since
1970. According to Metropolitan Council projections, the city will
reach 9,000 by 1990 and 10,200 by the year 2000. This growth will
; generate additional park and recreation demand.
' The community's planned diverse land use, physical characteristics
=� � and transportation corridors are integral components to evaluating
� , existing park developments and responding to future demographic
changes and additional development. This task's purpose is to
provide an information base from which the needs analysis can be
, completed. Subtasks inciude:
�
�
�
A. Review the existing Community Park System Plan (1971) and
the Recreation Facilities Survey (1977).
B. Review and analyze background information relating to the
park plan.
- Analyze demographic information (U.S. Census, school
district data, etc.) for information on age groups,
concentrations of special populations, etc. Mendota
Heights' changing demographics may require an
alteration of its park and recreation program.
- Review comprehensive plan (1979), existing land use
conditions, trends, development patterns and anticipated
phasing to show type, timing and intensity of growth
expected. Review of elements such as land use, natural
features and transportation will shape park service area
boundaries.
- � Meet with Planning Department staff to review
development trends, utility phasing, plans, etc. Also
discuss regulations, ordinances and procedures that will
have an affect on park and natural resources including
park dedication and shoreland protection requirements.
- Analyze existing conditions, trends and plans to show
type, timing and intensity of development planned.
Although Mendota Heights' growth rate is moderating,
trends can be interpreted to indicate areas where
demand for recreation resources will be high, unique
natural features may be appropriate for recreational us,e
or special populations, such as athletic associations, may
influence recreational needs.
Result: Technical memorandum summarizing Mendota Heights' existing
demographics, growth trends and other technical information which
influence park development. Barton-Aschman will provide up to ten
three ring binders for the memorandums.
Meeting: One meeting with Park and Recreation Commission
One meeting with city staff
Required
Information: Mendota Heights will make available previously prepared planning
documents such as its comprehensive plan, demographic information
and special studies.
�
TASK 2: INVENTORY OF EXISTWG PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES
Objective: To inventory and analyze park and recreation facilities that
influence Mendota Heights.
Discussion: Mendota Heights has a number of existing park facilities which vary
in size and facility development. In addition, the community has
access to nearby federal, state and regional park and open space
facilities. The inventory process will:
A. Locate and inventory federal, state or regional park and open
space facilities which abutt or are in close proximity to the
community. Representative agencies will be interviewed to
fully comprehend potential development or policy changes.
B. Inventory and assess developed community and neighborhood
parks and other special use areas. The inventory will include
sketch plans and discussion of:
- size, (acres)
- physical features such as topography, water bodies,
vegetation, focal points, etc.
- general character of the park and its role (passive,
active, etc.)
- detail of facilities: type, quantity, state of repair, etc.
- degree and type of use
- special problems such as incompatible adjacent land
uses; noise, safety or traffic problems; vandalism;
maintenance problems; water quality, etc.
C. Inventory and assess presently undeveloped parks and potential
recreation areas within Mendota Heights. Discussion for each
parcel will include:
- size and shape of parcel and its potential use (i.e., major
multiple-use complex)
- dominant physical features
- general site character
- status of pending plans or proposals for its use
- special planning considerations such as adjacent land use,
safety barriers, etc.
- suggestion of possible uses suitable for the site
D. Describe all public trails currently used for bicycles,
pedestrians, cross country skiing or equestrian and unofficial
corridors such as utility assessments.
E. General discussion of public indoor r.ecreation facilities, terms
of ownership and use, facilities included, degree of use,
general character, special concerns.
F. General discussion of historical and conservation areas within
the city, their present facilities, and the role they serve in
overall recreation needs, special concerns, etc.
G. General discussion of indoor and outdoor facilities at schools
and churches and the degree to which they are used or are
available for use by citizens. Opportunities and obstacles to
cooperative use and progremming.
H. Inventory and discussion of private/commercial recreation
facilities and the role of commercial recreation in meeting
local needs. The inventory will include a description of
facilities, programs, limitations on public use (i.e., member
only)fee structure.
Result: A comprehensive inventory of all city park and recreation resources
including a sketch and profile sheet discussing each site. Level of
detail will be commensurate with existing map detail.
A summary of all other recreation resources serving Mendota
Heights, describing facilities, access and availability for public�use,
both current and anticipated.
Required
Information: Mendota Heights will provide hase mapping (topographic and/or
half-section) for existing and proposed park sites.
;,�
TASK 3: COMPREFiENSNE f�EDS ANALYSIS
Objective: To determine Mendota Heights' existing and future park and
recreation facility needs.
Discussion: Mendota Heights' needs analysis will have a three-pronged approach
to provide a comprehensive review of the community's park and
recreation needs. Each methodology has its own specific analysis
strengths and, in turn, will reveal inadequacies which another
method may fail to acknowledge.
Analysis methodologies will include:
A. Comparison with accepted standards. General standards
relating proportions of park land and facilities to the
population, as well as suggesting facility service areas, may be
useful in evaluating the overall adequacy of the park and
recreation system. The "standards approach" is a useful tool
in stimulating further analysis, not substituting for it, and
should be used in accordance with other demand analysis
measures.
B. Interview Key Persons. Private interviews with key
community citizens who have specific interest in park,
recreation and athletics will be conducted. These interviews
promote communication and insights as to the performance of
existing facilities and procedures. Perceived needs and
constructive comments which may not surface in a public
forum are often identified. Interview candidates may include:
- community education or other school district personnel
- athletic association representatives
- city officials including the park's maintenance director,
Park and Recreation Commission, and planning staff
The city may suggest other Mendota Heights citizens for
Barton-Aschman interviews. Up to ten interviews will be
' conducted.
; C. Facility Assessment. A facility assessment will be made based
on Task 1 and 2 information. This analysis will review those
existing park and recreation development deficiencies on an
existing neighborhood and community facility basis which were •
identified through the inventory tasks.
Result: A technical memorandum will be produced which summarizes the
' needs analysis, including:
; A. Existing and projected five and ten year park needs. The
� analysis will show city-wide needs, as well as neighborhood or
planning subarea needs.
B. Adequacy of existing and planned facilities in terms of access,
location and usability.
,: �
�
C. Identify special use facility needs and probable timing of need.
D. Identify needs for future parks.
E, Identify qualitative espects af park needs; i,e., upgrading a
softball facility from sand lat to league play or canverting
temporary hocky rinks to permanent faciiities.
F, Map park nseds/deficiencies by location,
Meetings: O�e meeting with Park and Recreation Commission
Interviews with city sLaif and speciai interest groups
0
�
�
TASK a: REVIEW POLICY AND CRITERIA ISSIJ'ES
Objective: To review and revise or formulate basic community park policies.
Discussion: This task focuses on policy issues which Mendota Heights should
formulate, or review and revise as needed, previous to park facility
expansion. Typical issues which Barton-Aschman could assist in
reviewing may include:
- existing goals and policies relating to the park system
- the roles and interrelationships among various recreation
providers in Mendota Heights
- potential funding mechanisms and opportunities
- formulate a park dedication requirement involving developer
land dedication and/or fee
A. Review and evaluate existing goals and objectives from the
Comprehensive Plan and other documents relating to the
Mendota Heights Park System. Refine or augment as needed.
B. Review the roles and relationships between the various
recreation providers serving Mendota Heights residents, such
as: city, school districts, county or state agencies, quasi-
public agencies, or private organizations.
C. Develop suggested criteria for determining acquisition and
development priorities. Criteria might include such factors
as:
- availability or adequacy of existing facilities
- population to be served
- time frame of need; present vs. projected need
- potential method of implementation (dedication, grant,
bond issues, cooperative agreements, etc.)
Result: Technical Memorandum summarizing policy and criteria issues to
consider for revision or development.
Meetings: One meeting with Park and Recreation Commission
0
TAS�K 5: SCHEMATIG MASTER PARK PLAN5
Objective: To prepare master park plans which schematically organize
elements for devslopment, given identified site constraints,
Discussia�: This task will develop schematic sketches for park develapment
areas to be selected by the city. Writien descriptions will
complement the sketches describing proposed park development and
its relationship to the surrounding neighbarhaod. General cost
estimates will be provided for each schematic sketch.
A. Identify sites for which cancept plans will be prepared.
Prepare base rnaps of sites.
B. Identify function of park in terms af park classification,
service area needs, user groups, ete.
C. Rnalyze siie eharacteristics and suitability #or recreational
development including size, slape and soils limitation,
vegetation, adjacent land uses, access, and aesthetic
considerations such as views, natural features, ete.
D. Deveiap a schematic plan for each park. The master plan will
portray general park layaut and relationships between activity
areas.
E. Deveiop general cost estimates.
F. Review with staff, refine as needed.
Result: Schematic master plans for two parks to be selected by the city.
(Schematic skeiches can be prepared far additianal park sites _witF�
commensurate compensation.) Level of detail will reflect accuracy
of available mapping. ,
Required
Information: Mendota Heights will provide available topographic or half-section
mapping far the twa propased sites.
TASK 6:
Objective:
COMMUNITY TRAILS PLAN
To establish a framework plan which delineates trail development
for pedestrians, bicycles, cross country skiing and equestrian use.
Discussion: Mendota Heights has begun to implement bike trails with monies
from Dakota County. Other trail projects are eligible for state
grants. The comprehensive land use plan designates corridors for
development; however, additional detail is desirable to insure a
strong system based upon user group origins, destinations, physical
features and general design criteria.
A.
Q
C.
Inventory physical and cultural features which will influence
trail development. Factors may include:
- existing community trails
- developed or proposed regional trails
- significant barriers such as topographic, transportation
or cultural constraints
- logical trip generators (origins) and trip destinations
Define specific user groups based upon interviews with city
staff and representative user groups.
Establish goals and objectives for trail development.
D. Define location criteria to guide and evaluate trail corridors.
E. Formulate schematic trail corridors for bicycle, pedestrians,
cross country skiing and equestrian. Multi-modal and single
use trails will be considered.
F. Establish general design standards for each trail mode. Trail
widths, surface materials and gradient constraints will be
recommended.
Result: A memorandum will be produced which summarizes and delineates:
A. A synthesis of factors influencing trail location
B. Summary of trail goals and objectives, and locational criteria
Meetings:
Required
Information:
C. Schematic framework plans delineating trail corridors for:
1., bicycles
2. pedestrians
3. cross country skiing
4. equestrian
D. Summary of design standards
One meeting with Park and Recreation Commission
Interviews with prominent user groups
Mendota Heights will provide base mapping as needed for trails
planning.
. i� HIR�Otfice Copy
`°�'�"� � PURCHASE AGREE1VxENT TELLOR'—Bu�•er's CoP3'
=, GREEN—Selier'e Capy
.+-� P1NK—Buyer'e Recelpt
` 3�.:.ER-DA1°3S Ca.
SIinneapolis
....................................................M1IlII., ............................................... .� X�........
RIECErvED OF . The„Citx„of,..Mendata.,Heights,,,a.,.Minnesota,.municipal.,corporatian...
....... . ......... .
che �m af......One_.Hundred..and.00j100--..---�...-----.----,-----------.----..t�..lOQ.44........ .) DOLI.ARS
.. ...., _ __ _ _ _ _ ............ .
check . as earnest money and in parc payment for the purchase of properry at
... .. .................. ........................................... .. �
{Cise�c, Guh, to be dtposited n7pon aeceptanee, or Note — State W hicb}
..... See,.attached„le�ga!„descriptian ............. ' ................. ........................: .. ........ ....................situated in che
Cvt: :.ry• of .................D3kot�.............,......................,......, State af Minnesota, and lega2Iy described as fallows, to-wit:
See attached Exhibit A.
incic3ing all garden bulbs, plants, shrubs and trees, all srorm sash, scorm doors, detachable vestibules, screens, awnings, window
shac�, bIinds {includin,g venetian blinds}, currain rods, travezse rods, drapery rods, lighting fxtures and bnlbs, plumbing
fixr.�-es, hot water tanks and heating plant (with'any burners, tanks, stokers and other equipment used in conneccion there-
wirij, water sofcener and liquid gas tank and controls {if the praperty of seller), sump pump, television antenna, inciner-
ato:. built-in dishwasher, gazbage disposa2, ovens, coak top sraves and central air canditianing equipment, if any, used and
loc�..:d on said premises and including also the fallowing personal property:
ali ol which prapercy the undersigned has this day sold to the buyer for the sum af:
Three Hundred Eighty Six, Thousand and 00/100---------------------- �� 3$6,000.00 � DpLLARS,
...... ................. .. ............................ ...................
xhi� the buyer agrees to pay in the foltowing manner.
• • 100 00 the balance 85,900.00 • •
Earn�c money herein pa�d �.... .� .............. and �......................., � ...................�f1....C.�1SI1..4!?..., the date of closing.
This Purchase Agreement is expressly made cantingent upon (i} payment by the Seiler of
,'" any and all back taxes on the property, including any and al! taxes deferred under the
� Green Acres Statute, and upan {ii} the successful completian by #he Buyer, no Iatec than
% May 31, 19$5, of a bond referendum to finance the entire purchase price. In the event
_� �ither or both af such conditians is nat sa#is#ied by May 31, l985, this Purchase �greement
shall be null and void and of no effect whatsoever. ��
Subjcz ca perfarmance by the buyer the seiler agrees co execute and deliver a.........Fuii � ......Warranty Decd
...........................................
(to i+e joined in by spouse, if aay} canveying markecable title ta said premises subjett only to the folloRing exceptions:
(a,� Buildin� and zoning laws, ordinances, State and Federal regulations.
(b1 Restrictions selating ta use or imgtovement of Qremises without effettive forfeicure provision.
(�} Rcsetvazion of aay minerals or msneral rights ta the State of Minnesata. �
(d ) Ucility and drainage easements which do not interfere with present improvements.
(t� Rights of tenants as follows: (unless specified, aot subjea to tg ncies)
The buper shall pay the reai estate taxes due in xhe year 19 .?5�..„apd any unpaid insta!lrnents of specia! assessments gagabie therew�ith
and �ereafcer. Seller warrants that real estate taxes due in the year 19 .,iS.7.. will be ................................... ............... hamestsad tIassific:�tian
(full, partial or nomhomestcad—state which)
Neixher che seIler nor the selIei s agent makt any representatian or waxranty whatsoever cancerning the unounc of real tscate taxes
whi� shatl be assessed against the property subsequent ta the date of ptsrchase.
Seller covenants that buildings, if any, art entirely within the boundary lines of the propetty and agtees to remove all personal propercy
aot ia:luded herein aad all debris fram the gremists prior to possession dace. SELLER WARRANTS ALL APPLIANCES, HEAT]NG, AIR
CO\"DITI(3NING, WiRING AND PLUMBING i7SET3 AND LOCATED ON SAID PREIviISES ARE IN PTtQPER WORKIiVG QRDER
AT D �TE OF CLOSING. .
The seiler funher agrees to delivcr possession not luer than . the.,,db'�..C.e...0�,,, C105111� ,.,,,,. provided that all condi�ions of this
agrr:ment have been tompiied wath. Unless otherveist spetified this sale shall be closed on or befare 60 days fram the c3ate hereof.
In the event this properry is destroyed ot substantially damaged by fire ar any other cause beforc the closing date, this agreement shall
becaae null and void, at the purchaser's option, and all monies paid heteunder s6a11 be mfunded to him.
The buyer aad seller also mutuallp agree that pzo rata adjust nts � r nts, igtert, t, insurance and citp Rater, and, in che case of
incaae praperry, cutrent operating expenses, shall be made as of ... ....��e,,,,,:�:;�e,,,C?S„ C10Siilg, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,
The sellet shall, within a reasonable time after approval of this agreement, furnish an abstract of title, or e Regiscered Froperty
Ab�tt 'cg scified to date ta include praper searches toversng banktuptcies, aad State and Federai judgments and liens. The buper shall be
aUa�c:d 1W days r�fter receipt thereof for txamination af said title and the making of xny objeccions thereto, said objections to be made in
wn'••i�e or deemed to be waived. If any objec[ions are sa made the seller shali be allowed 120 days ta make such title markecable. Pending
rnmTion af citle the paymencs heteunder requized shall be postpaned, but upan correttion of title and within 10 daps after written natice
to c� buyer, the parties shall perform this agreernent acrording ta its terms.
If said title is not marketable and is not made so a�ithin ]20 days from xhe date of written objettions thereto as abovc provided, this
a�re�ent shall be null and void, at option af the bnyer, and neither principai shaii be iiable for damaees hereunder ta che other printipal.
Aii ��ney therecqfore paid by the buyer shali be refnnded. if the tide so said properry be fouad marketable or be so made within said time,
anc vid buyer shall defaulc in any of the agreements and continue in default far a petiod of 10 days, then and in that case the seller may
ter�ute this contratt and on such terminatian all the payments made upon thie conrrace shall be retained by said seller and said agent, as
xhei: respective interescs may appear, as ]iqusdaced damages, cime besn� of che essence heseaf. This provisian shall not deprive eirher parcy of
the r�h� of enforcin,� the specific performance of this cantracc provided such contratt shall not be rerminated as aforesaid, and provided aaion
to r'�rce such specific perfotmance shall be commenced wichin six months afcex such right of accion shall arise.
Ic is understood and agreed chac this sale is made subjecc to che approval by the ou�ner af said premises in uriti»g anc� that the under•
sigac_ acent is in no manner liable or responsible on account of this a�reemenc, except to recurn or accnunr for the earnest maney paid under
this :. ncract.
Thr s:livery af all papers and moaies shall be made at che office of :
WII�;Tf-IR,OP, WEINSTINE dc SEXTON
1$Ofi �anwed"Tower,' �44"Ceclar"St: .......... .......
Saint Paui, Minnesota 55101
I. the undersigntd, owner of the above Jand, do hereby approve
the x��vice agreement aad the sale thereb � made.
The Estate af Mary R. V�tachtler
... .................................... {SEAL}
SelIer
............................................ ..........................................
By............................................................................................Agent
I hereby s�rce to•purchase the said ptopercy for che price and
upon the cerms a6ove mentioned, and subjecc to aTt randicians
��°��dMENDOTA HEIGHTS
g�YtS �ByOC ................Buyex...................................(SEAL)
" sEa�. j } And . t >
....... ..................................... ..s�iirr. ................................. ( % I ( ��ItS ��CJ��C�C. ................ .Buver.................................. SEAL
1"Hl� IS A LEGALI_l' 83NDiNU Ct71�7'itACT. IF NC}"I' UNI}I'Itti'3'C�I7. S1:I:K C�MPi:"1'I:tti'7� AI7VICE.
S
Exhibit A
That part of Government Lot Eight (8) described as follows: Commencing at a point
40 rods West of the Southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4) of Section
Twenty three (23), Township Twenty eight (28), Range Twenty three (23), thence North
at rights angles 20 rods, thence West at right angles 40 rods, thence South at rights
angles 20 rods to the South line of said Northeast Quarter (NE1/4) of said Section
Twenty three (23), thence East along said South line of said Northeast Quarter (NE1/4)
of said Section 'fwenty three (23) 40 rods to the place of beginning,
AND '
Government Lot Eight (8) except the North 280.6 feet of the West 375 feet and except
the South 20 rods thereof, all in Section Twenty three (23), Township Twenty eight
(28), Range Twenty three (23), according to the Government Survey thereof, Dakota
County, Minnesota.
�t'A7TF.rdifice CoTY
- =`0.75'�� � PURCT-iASE AGREEIVIENT YELLOR'—Su)er'e CopS
. GREEN—Seller's Co3a�•
J�.LER-DAVIS Co. P1Nh:—Buyer's Recefpt
JtinneapoSis
....................................................Minn., ............................................... ., 19........
REC:ENED OF .... The City of Mendota Heights,..a...Minnesota,.municipal., corporation,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,
rh� s,�m of..One. Hunc3ced„and„OOJ144______________________________________.{ ..I.OQ..O.Q ....,.. DOLLARS
$ ..}
check . , as eatnest money and in parc payment for che purchase of property ac
{Cbr.,3c, Gash, ta be drposited upon acctptanee, or Note—�Ststt Whieh}
...... .2150...and 2156 Dodd„ Road ............................................................................................. ........sicuated ia che
Co�.:ary of .............Dakot�........,..........,.................,........., Scate af Minnesota, and Iegally described as fallaws, to-wit:
The North 166.7 feet of the South 713.4 feet of the !'Jorth 20$.7 feet of the
Southwest 1 J4 of the Sauthwest 1/4 of Section 25, Tawnship 28, Range 23
inci;�ding all garden bulbs, plants, shrubs and trees, all scorm sash, storm doors, decachable vestibules, screens, awnings, windoa•
st�es, b2inc3s (including venetian blinds}, curcain rods, traverse rods, c3rapery rods, lighting fixtures and bulbs, plumbin�
fix:ues, hot wacer tanks and heating planc (with'any burners, tanks, stakers and ocher equipment used in conneccion there-
aiW}, watez saftener and liquid gas tank and controis {if the properry af seller}, samp pump, television an;enna, inciner-
aco., builc-in dishwasher, garbage disposal, avens, cook top scoves and cencral air conditioning equipment, if any, used and
lo�.red on said premises and including also the following personal properry:
aII o£ which psogerty che undersigned has this day said to the buyer £or the sum of:
Seventp-Six..Thousand...Six Hundred„Twenty,-,F',�.,y,e„and„OOJ1Q0----------- ��7�,�,�5..00......) DOLLARS,
...... ..,.. ........
ahi:h the buyer agrees ta pay in the fallawing manner:
^��s mo e exein aid �....�����Q........ and � the .balance� of 76,525.00 in cash Qn � the date of closing.a
.... ....
k� c� s�i�l in �ia event be Iater that� May 3I, 1985.
Su�;ccc ca perfarmance by the buyer the seller agrees to extcute znd deliver a ................... �.=��1. .......................... Warranty Deed
. .....................
(co be joined in by spouse, if any) conveying markecab2e titIe to said pzeraises subjecc only co the faltowing exctpcions:
(a� Building and zaning laws, ordinances, Scate and Fedetal regulations.
{h; Restriccions relating to use os ianptovernenc of premises without effective forfeiture provision.
{cs Reservatian af any minerals or minerai rights ta the State of Minnesota.
(d � Ucility and drainage easements which do not interfere with pccsent improvements.
(c• Rights af tenants as follows: (unless specified, aot subjecc to�g9ancies)
The buyer shall pay the rtal estare taacts due in the year 29 #b.. �nd any unpaid installmtnts of special assessments payable therew�ich
anc thereaftox. Seller warrants that real estate taxes due ia the year 19 g,?... will be ................................................... hdmestead ctassificacion
(fuU, paaiai or non•homestead—state which)
Neither the seller nor the seller's agent makt any rtpresentation or warranty whatsoever coaarning the amaunt of real estate taxts
�•hi� shall be assessed against the property subsequent to the date of purchase.
Seller covenancs that buildings, if any, are entirely within the boundary lines of the property and agrees to remove all persanal propercT
no: inciuded hertin and afl debris from the premises prior ta possession date. SELLER WAIiIiANTS ALL APFLIANCES, HEAT'II�IG, AIR
CO\'DITIONING, WIRING AND PLUMBING USED AND LC3CATED ON SAID FREMISES ARE IN PROPER WORKiNG QRDER
AT DATE OF CLOSING. t}'1@ d �
The seller futther agrees co deliver possession not later chan .. ....... att',,,Of_,C�OS117�.._.._,_._pravided chat alI tonditions of this
ag:rment have been comp3ied witts. Untess otherwise spetified this sate shall be ctosed on ar before 60 days from tht date.hereaf.
In the event this praperry is destroyed or substaatially damaged by 5re ot any oth�r cause before the closing date, this agreement shall
�;a�e nuli and vaid, ac rhe puzchaseis ogtion, and atl manies paid hereunder shzll be tefunded to him.
The bvyer and seller sIso mncually agree thar pro raca adjnstg�encs gf enzs, ` terqsr, insurance aad city a�arer, and, in che case of
in...me propetty, current operating expenses, shall be made as of ........:4.!1.�...4���"•...Q�..C19S1.[lg .. ........................................... .......... ..
The seller shall, ivithin a reuanable time after approval of this agreement, furnish an abstract of tide, ar a Iiegistered Propern•
Ab=,na cp rtifred ta date to intlude proper searthes cavtring bankruptcies, and Scace and Federa] judgments and liens. The buyer shall E�
allc.ced �D► days after receipc thereof for exunination of said title and the making of any objections thareto, said objections to be made in
a•ri�.ine or deemed ta be waived. If any objeaions s�re so made rhe seller shall be allowed 120 days to make such title marketable. Pending
rnrn.-cion of ticle the payments hereunder required shall be postponed, but upon carrectian af ticle and wichin i0 days after �a�ricten notice
eo c1e buyer, the parties shall perfatm this agreement according to its ter;ms.
If said title is not marketable and is not made so a•ithin 120 days from the date of wtitten objections theteto as above provided, chis
acnzment shall be nnll and vaid, at aption af the buyer, and neither printipal shall he Iiable for damages hereunder to the other pzincipal.
Al: c�uney theretofare paid by the buyer shall be refunded. If the title to said praperry be found marketabte or be so made wirhin said timc,
anc said buyet shall default in any of the agreements and continue in defaulc foc a petiod of lp days, then and in that case the seller may
ter.:.-inace this contratt aad an such termination all the payments made upan this concract sha31 kre retained bp said seller and said agent, at
the:: respective interescs may appear, as liquidared ciama�es, time being af the esse»ce hereaf. Thls pravisian shall aot deprive either parry• of
che rich� of enforcia� the specific performance of this contraa pravided such contratt shaU not be terminated as aforesaid, and provided aaion
ta r.tfurce such specific petfotmance shall be commenced within six monchs afcer such right of action shall arise.
ic is understoad and aerecd rhat this sale is made subject to the appzoval by the owner of said premises in wriciag and that the under-
sic.^.:*�i aGent is in no manner liable or respansible an accaunt of this a�;reemenc, except to return or account for the eamest money paid under
tUi� contract.
Th; drlivery of aIl papers and monies shalJ be mado at the affice of:
V�i1NTHROP, WEINSTINE � SEXTON
' S�}'0" on "ed"Toive'r...�4t�...Cei3ar �'St: ................
�aint au�, Minnesot'a 55i01
I. the undersigncd, owner of che above lnnd, do hereby approve
the rSove agreement uad che saIe thereby made.
Fiar'r'y""'R:' 'Kicct�ne'r'. . ..s�iiei ................................... tsEa�.>
...... . . ...... . ............. ....... ................................. (SEAL)
Elaine 1VI:"'K'ircFiner ��i�r
,By .................�,........................................................................ Agenc
i hcreby agree ta pnrchase she said pzopercy far the pricc and
upon the terms above mentianed, and subjcct to aIl conditions
������`p��dh9ENDOTA HEIGHTS
.�Y�Its ��lVla. .ac . .............. .......................................... tS�nL>
y Buyer
F►,�tt�Tts...�'Ie'rk . ............... .......................................... �s;�nr.>
8uver
1'I-il� IS A LI:GALLY BINDING CON7'RAC:'I'. iF NOT llNDI:RS'TOt}I}� ;;i?i;}� CpMPF:"I'I:N'I' ADVICF.
�,,. ,:,�:'==
df1L' I.L•'It-17A\'Iti l`��.
" \Iintte:ti�teli:�
PURCHASE A�REEIt�ENT
................................ .. ..............Minn., .,...........
�1'IiITE--Ufflc�• l'np�'
Yt:S.Lt)tit'-2iu}•ec':: t.:r�iyy.
t:RLf*.b7—Se3ier's Copy
YINK—Buyer's 2teceipt
........ .................... .. 19 ......
� R�CEIVED OF The City..af,..Mendata..Heights,.,a...Minnesata.,municipa! .�orparation...__
che sum of One Hundred .and._00/100------------;-----------------------.,,�g .100.00. ,.,,� DOLLARS
.. ..�h��� . as earnest maney and in garc payment for the purchase af propercy ar
. .. . .. ... ... . .... ............................. ..
(Chrck, Cash, W be depoeited upon acoeptance, or Note— Sute Whieh)
.......See„a#tached.,legal,.description .......... .................... . ....... sicuaced in che
.... .... . . . . .. . ... ............... .
Councy of .................D3kot�,,,,,_,,,,,,,.,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.� State of Minnesara, and legally described as Eollows, co-wit:
See attached Exhibit A.
including at2 garden butbs, ptancs, shrubs and rrees, att scorm sash, srorm doors, deracl�able vescibules, screens, awnings, window
shades, blinds (including vet�etian blinds), curcain rods, craverse rods, drapery rods, lighting fixtures and bulbs, plurnbing
fixtures, hoc water canks and heacing planr (wich'any burners, tanks, stokers and ocher equigment used in conneaian there-
wich}, wacer softener and liquid gas tank and tan�roIs (if the properry of selIer), sump pump, tetevisioh antenna, inciner-
acor, builr-in dishwashet, garbage disposal, avens, cook tap sraves and cencr�l air condicioning equipmenr, if any, used and
lacated on said premises and including also the fotiawing personal propercy:
all af which praperry che undersigned has this day sold to the buyer for the sum af:
Three Hundred Eigi�ty..Six Thousand and OQ/100---------------------- (� 386,OOQ.00.. ) DOLLAR5,
.............. . . .. .. .
which che buyer agrees zo pay in che following manner:
Earnesc money herein paid $..1.Q0.00...., .. a„� �C..the,, baiance��85,944.QQ ��...����..�n..., the dace af ctasing.
Subjrcc cu perfutmance by the buyer the seller a�rees to e�:ecure and detiver a FU�1 . Warraney Deed
(tn be ioined in by spuuse, if any) conveyinc markecablc ticle tu said premises subject cmlp co the follow•inF exceptians:
ta) Buiidin�; an�i zoning taw•s, ordinances. Scace and Fcdera! re�;ntaciuns.
i b) Rrstricci�ns re3aciag xo use or improvement of premises wachouc effective f�rfciauc pn}visian.
(c) Resecvacion n£ any minerals or mineral righcs to ch¢ Scate of Minnrsoca.
{d) licilitp and drainage easemencs which do nc�t incerfece wich present improvemencs.
{ei Rights of ccnancs ax foIlaws: {untess specified, noc xubjecc to t cyncies}
The buyer shalt pay the real escace taxes due in the year 19 .�b apd a�y unpaid inscallments of special assessmen�s payable thereN�ich
and chereafcer. Scller warrana chat real estare taxes due in che year l9 H7 will be .... ....... ... ... homescead classi6cacion
{ full, parcial or n<>n�h�mestead —statt whirh)
Neither the srller nor che seticr's agent make any represencatiun or warrancy whacscxver conceroin�; tht amount of real estatt caxts
a�hich shall be assessed a,�ainst the property substquent to the �iate of purchasc.
Selitr tovtnants that buildinLs, iE any, arc encirely wichin the buundary lines c>f che properr}• and egrees to remove a!! persona! property
aot indudcd hercin and aIi deb�is from the promises grior co possessioo datt. SELLER WAItRANTS ALL APPLIANCES. HEATING, AIR
COND17"IONING, WIRING AND PLUhiB1NG USED AND I.UCATED ON SAID PRF.htISES ARE IN PROPER WORKING ORDER
AT DATE OF CLQSING.
The seller further a,erees ta delivu possessian aot lacer than tit� dclt£ ..0� closing , P�ov;d�d that alt conclicioas of this
a�reemenc have been complied wich. Unless o�herwise specitied rhis sate shall be closed on or before 60 days from che dace hereof.
Tn the evenc [his properry is descroyed or subscantially damaged by fire or any other cause before che clasing date, this agreemenc shaU
become nu21 aad void, at che purchaser's apcion, and ali monies paid hereunder shall be refunded to him.
Th� buyex and seller aiso mutually agrce that pro ratx adjnst ncs a� t nts, i�tere t, insurance and city warer, and, in thc case of
incame propercy, currenc operacing expenses, shall be made as af .��e, u1�e a,, el`osing ,. ,..,, ..,.,
The srller shall, wichin a reasonable time after appzaval of this agreement, furnish an abstract of title, or a Re�;isteseei Pzoperty
Abscraci ni6ed to dace to include proper searches coverin� bankruptcies, and Srate hnd Federal jud�:mencs and tiens. The buyer shali be
aUowed � days after receipt thereof for eaamina�ion aC said title and the making of any objec�ions theretu, said objections tu be madr in
wricing or deemed ca be waived. 2f any objeccions are su made the seller shall bc allotived 120 days te> make such titic nyarkecablc. Fending
curreccion of cide she payments hereunder rtquired shal2 be postponed, but upon correctinn af cicle aa3 u•irhin It} days after wriccen notice
co rhe buyer, che parcies shall perform chis aGreament arrnrdin�, to ics terms.
Ii said titic is noc marketa6le and is not made s� w•ithin 1?Q Jays frum tl�c dace af writtcn objectiuns thereco as above provided, this
agreemenr shail be nutt and void, ac aptioa of che buyer, an3 neicher y>rinri�>al shall be liable far damaees hereunder tc� chc other principai.
All money duretuture paid by the Uuyec shalt bc refunded. lf the tide w said ptuperty bc found markecaUle or be so madc w�ithin said timc,
and said I�uyer shall defaulc in any of the agreemencs and continue in default fcu a period of 10 days, then and in thac case the seller may
terminace this tontraa and on such terminacic�n atl the gagments made upon ch'ss roncraa shalf be recained by said set4er and said a�;ent, as
cheir respective incerescs may appear, as liquidaced damages, time bein�; af the essence herec>f. This provision shat3 not deprive either party of
thc riFhc of enforcinG chr s{xahc pertormunce of this cuntracc provided such cuntract shall nut be terminaced as aforesaid, and ptovided action
co enfcrrce such specitic perfarmance shail be cammenced wiehin six monchs afcrr such richc ol action shall arise.
!t is undrrscocxf and a4*ecJ chet this sale is made subjca co thr appre>va1 tsy tiu: c,wnrr ;�f �aicl psemises in writin�; anil that the �ncier-
sr'gned a;;enc is in no manner liable or responsible on arcoun� ot this a�;reemenc, excrpc cu recurn ur acc�>unt fc>r chr earnest mnney paid under
chix conaaa.
ThedeIivcryofaltpapersandmoniesshatlbemadeatchcoff�ceaf: • • ••.. .•••••••�• •••�.•.• . ••••�. •�.�••••••••• •.••••••••••••�- � •• •
WI�ITHROP,. WEINSTINE & SEXTON .....................................................................
......... . ........... .. . .. . .... ..... .. .... . .. .....
1$g0...�onwed"Tower, �44' Cedar St... .
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 By ..... .. .. ............................................. .......................... .. . Agent
I, tht undersigned, owner of the abovt land, do hereby apprave
the above agreement and the sale thereb made. I hereby agree to purchase the said property for the price and
The Estate of Mary R. �1Cht1eC upon che cerms abave mencioaed, and subrett co att condicions
��p��dMENDOTA HEIGHTS
............................................... ...................,............... {SEAL)
..Seller .............. .......................................... ( )
y�t3 �Ir"1 ��OC �� "'�' SEAL
y Buyat
................................................ .(SEALj And ...................................(sEnL>
..Scller ................................ "It's"'�1'e'rk..................Buver
THIS IS A LEGALLY BiNI7ING CONTRACi. IF NOT C`NDEKSTUt?D, SEF.h COMFETENI' ADVIGE.
.•.w �•;• -
� ,
. .•'; .
.. �
Exhibit A
That part of Government Lot Eight (8) described as follows: Commencing at a point
40 rods West of the Southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter (NEl/4) of Section
Twenty three (23), Township Twenty eight (28), Range Twenty three (23), thence North
at rights angles 20 rods, thence West at right angles 40 rods, thence South at rights
angles 20 rods to the South line of said Northeast Quarter (NEl/4) of said Section
Twenty three (23), thence East along said South line of said Northeast Quarter (NEl/4)
of said Section Twenty three (23) 40 rods to the place of beginning,
AND
Government Lot Eight (8) except the North 280.6 feet of the West 375 feet and except
the South 20 rods thereof, all in Section Twenty three (23), Township Twenty eight
(28), Range Twenty three (23), according to the Government Survey thereof, Dakota
County, Minnesota.
, \n. 1517�
• ' JIILI,EK-DA1'IS l;o.
�iinneapolis
\\'lil'PI:--Officc Cupy
1'P:I 1 U�1'—Liul'er's l;opy
PURCHASE AGREEIVIENT ;;R;:h N�3ujeer's';�e�eipt
....................... ... . .. ............ .Minn., ............................... ................ ., 19........
RECEIVED OF The City of Mendota Heights, a Minnesota,.municipal. corporation,,,,,,,
che sum of One Hundred and 00/100------„--------------------------------.�g„1.OQ..0.0..... .) DOLLARS
....................... ....................
check , as earnesc money and in parc paymenc for the purchase of properry at
. . .... . .. ..... . ........................... ..
(Check, Cash, to be deDosited uDon acceptance, or Note—Stau Whtch)
2150 and 2156 Dodd Road
.. .. . ... . . .... .. . ... ... ............................... ...... .. ..... .... . .. . .... . ... .. . .. ..situaced in che
Counc of Dakota,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,� $�ate of Minnesoca, and legally described as follows, co-wit:
y ..............
The North 166.7 feet of the South 713.4 feet of the North 208.7 feet of the
Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 25, Township 28, Range 23
including all garden bulbs, plancs, shrubs and crees, all storm sash, scorm doors, decachabie vestibules, screens, awnings, window
shades, blinds (including venetian blinds), curcain rods, traverse rods, drapery rods, lighting fixtures and bulbs, plumbing
fixcures, hoc water ranks and heating planc (with'any burners, canks, scokers and other equipmenc used in conneccion chere-
wich), water sofcener and liquid gas cank and controls (if the properry of seller), sump pump, television antenna, inciner-
acor, builc-in dishwasher, garbage disposal, ovens, cook top scoves and cencral air conditioning equipment, if any, used and
locaced on said ptemises and including also the following personal properry:
all of which properry che undersigned has this day sold to the buyer for the sum of:
Seventy-Six..Thousand. .Six...Hundred.,.Twenty,-,F'-,i,ve„and„00/1Q0----------- � 7{,6.25..A0.......) DOLLARS,
. . . . ............ $
which the buyer agrees to pay in the following manner:
Ea nes mo e he;ein aid S..100.00 ..,,, and S.the..balance of 76,525.00 in cash o� � the dace of closing, �
w�ic� s�i�ll in r�o event be later than Niay 31,��1'985. ����
This Purchase Agreement is expressly made contingent upon (i) payment by the Seller of
any and all back taxes on the property, including any and all taxes deferred under the
Green Acres Statute, and upon (ii) the successful completion by the Buyer, no later than
May 31, 1985, of a bond referendum to finance the entire purchase price. In the event
either or both of such conditions is not satisfied by May 31, 1985, this Purchase Agreement
shall be null and void and of no effect whatsoever.
Subject to performance by the buyer [he seller agrees co execute and deliver a FUll ., , Warranty Dced
(to be joined in by spouse, if any) conveying marketable title to said premises subject only to the followinF exceptions:
(a) Buildin� and zoning laws, ordinances, State and Fedecal tegulations.
(b) Restriaions telacing to use or improvement of premises without effective fotfeiture provisic�n.
(c) Reservacion of aay minerals or minerai rights to the State of Minnesota.
(d) Utility and drainage easemencs which do not interfere with present improvements.
(e) RiRhcs of cenancs as foliows: (unless specified, not subjecc co 9ancies)
The buyer shalt pay che real estace caxes due in the year 19 .�b d any unpaid inscallments of s{xcial assessmencs payable cherewich
and thereafter. Seller warrants that real es�ate taxes due in the year 19 $�.. will be . ...... .... ... .. .. homestead classi6cation
(full, partial or non-homescead—scate which)
Neither the seller nor the seller's agen� make any represen[ation or warranry whacscever concerning the amount of real estace caxes
s+hich shall be assessed againsc [he proper[y subsequent to the dace of purchase.
Selier covenancs that buildings, if any, are entirely wichin the boundary lines of che property and agrees to remove all personal property
not i�cluded herein and all debris from [he premises prior to possession date. SELLF.R WARRANTS ALL APPLIANCES, HEATING, AIR
CONDITIONING, WIRING AND PLUMBING USED AND LOCATED ON SAID PREMISES ARE IN PROPER WORKING ORDER
AT DATE OF CLOSING.
The seller furcher a,�rees co deliver possession not later than ,th�'- da.te Of C10Slf1g , provided thac all condirions of this
agreement have been complied wich. Unless otherwise specified this sale shall be closed on or before 60 days from the date hereof.
in the event this property is descroyed or substantially damaged by tire or any other cause before the closing date, this agreement shall
becume null and void, ac the purchaser's opcion, and all monies paid hereunder shall be relunded co him.
The buyer and seller also mucually agree that pro rata adjust Lents f ents, ' ter sc, insutance and city water, and, in the case of
income properry, current operating expenses, shall be made as of ��le c�a�e.. o�' e�os�ng ..
.. ... ...... .. .. .. .
The seller shall, wi�hin a reasonable time afcer approval of this asreemenr, furnish an abstraa of title, or a Re�iscered Propercy
Abstnct c£ rti6ed to date to include proper searches coverinF bankruptcies, and State and rederal judgments and liens. Tlie buyer shall be
allowed �U� days after receipt thereof for examination of said title and the making of any objections thereto, said objections �o be made in
wricing or deemed to be waived. If any objections are se� made the seller shall br alloW�ed 120 days to make such title marketable. Pendin�;
correaion of tide the payments hereunder required shall be poscponed, but upun correction of title and K�i[hin 10 days afrer written notice
«� rhe buyer, che parties shall perform this a�reement accordin� to its terms.
If said tide is no� marketable and is nuc made su w•ithin 12U days from the date of wricten objec[ions thereco as above pruvided, chis
acreemenc shall be null and void, ac opcion of che buyer, an� neither principal shall be liable for damages hereunder co the other principal.
All muney rherecofure paid by the buyer shall be refunded. It the �irlc tc� said pruperty be found marketable or be so made within said time,
anJ said buyer shatl defaulc in any of the agreements and continue in �lefaul� for a period of 10 daps, then and in that case the seller may
rerminace ch'is concratt and on such cerminacion all the payments made upon chis contraa shall be retained by said seller and said a�;ent, as
their respec�ive incerescs may appear, as liquidated dama�;es, time bein�; uf the essence hereof. This Provision shall not Jeprive ei[her parry of
che ric;hc of enforcing rhe speu6c performance of tl�is contract provided such contract shall no[ be rerminated as aforesaid, and provided accion
co enforce such specific performance shall be commenced a�ichin six monchs afcer such right of actio� shall arise.
Ic is understood and aeree.� that this sale is mdde subject to the appro�•al by the owner of said premises in wtiting and chat the unJer-
signeJ a,cen[ is in no manner liable or responsible on aarn�nt of this acreement, e�crpc cu recurn or accounr for che earnesc money paiJ under
this e�>ntcact.
The delivery of ap papers and monies shall be made at theoffice of: •. •• .••• •••••••.•••••••.••••••••••. ...•••• .•• ••• ••••••.•• • .
WINTHROP, WEINS'TINE � SEXTON
. . ..... .. . ... .... . .. .... .................................................................. ... .. . ..
. . ...
00 ori ed"Towe'r; �' '�" e ar t."'
aint au�, Minnesota 5101 gY .......... Agenc
.... .. ........................................................ .... ... ...
I, che undersigned, owner of the above land, do hereby approve
the above agreement and the sale thereby made. I hereby agree to purchue the said pro rty .'or the price and
H'a'r'r"y"..A: "fCi'rcfirie'r'......s�iier ...................................�sEnL)
upon che terms above mencioned, and subject to all condicions
h�r��l°Y P��d1VlENDOTA HEIGHTS
.Rj! ....................................................................................... ( SEAL )
ItS Mayor Buyer
.......... . . ,...... .............................. (SEAL) II ��d ..........................................(SEAL)
EIaine 1VI:"'K'irchrier'�'�s�tier Tts���C'Ie'rk"""""�""""'B�yet
'1'HIS IS A LEGAI.L�' BINDINCT CON7'KAC7'. li� NOT C;NDERS'I'OUD, SIiFiI: CUME'F.'I'I:N'1' ADVICF:.
� ,. ,
... ' �