1985-11-05�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
NOVEMBER 5, 1985 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order. — �; �Q
�Dn ��} %��`
2. Roll Call. - u�.(' �t�e_,,%� � ''���'
�� %
3. Approval of Minutes, October 15th. ,� �
4. Consent Calendar: � �
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
�
i.
J•
k.
1.
m.
/��
Acknowledgement of October 8th Park and Rec Minutes.
Acknowledgement of October 22 Planning Commission Minutes.
Acknowledgement of October Code Enforcement Report.
Acknowledgement of Memo on Sewer Rates.
Acknowledgement of Letter from Betty Armstrong.
Request for Final Payment - Andersen/Curley Improvements esolution o. 85-84).
Dodd Road Watermain Deferment (Resolution No. 85-85) .^ �� ��i=� ��,Q%�
Request for Council Agendas.�
Sale of Park Truck. -
Acknowledgement of Resignation of Planning Chairperson and
of Expiration.
Request for Beaver Trapping.^
Approval of the List of Claims.
Approval of the List of Licenses.
Commission Terms
End of Consent Calendar. ,
5. Public Comments. — 3'�" �"' pyy�.��C� • �� �
%Gtc� �/ " / �
6. Introductions.� �
�, `x
�. �7. Bid Awards and Hearings �"� �"
`�_ ar�
a. B'd Awar fo $ 60,00 Equipment Certificates. (Resolution No. 85s�,C�f.'�
�� ���a� � - G . � �� °l
b. HEARING for Bon Issue for Health Resources, Inc. (7:45 P.M.).
,�.�.� � ��. 3�
c. HEAR NG on Bro ton Courts Easement acatio�1 .(8:00 P.M. - Resolution No. 85-8i
��� a..,,.,;R ,�, � 9 : �o �, ,�) .��'�,,�„� —iG..�/ %� . -c"�,,� �.fi�--�!'
8. Unfinished and New Business 1
Sou heast Area ompre� n ve.Plan(� endments. ' �_ ���- �
���...� � •/ J`�- - ����� �% �? �. 1 J°,z.
-���. d - endo �'�ei t Associates.�
R u t for Multi-fa/�yp�il Housin Revenue\ Bon s M g �
�S r�y / I �_� � ��� �o� � iYl ' �I� � ��0�
o ment en ment �o Preliminar la D elo e's ree en
a e Deve �
��aG,r�;� � �t�� ���-�% y i ��� �
r e uest for V riance. Recontr4►end A roval .
Case No. 85-28, Lii�smaye , R q ( pP )
�� r
Case No. 85- , Linvill Dakota Business Plaza, Request for Sign Variance. �
(Re��n�pproval� .p�
� ��l dti
0
�
November 5, 1985 Agenda
Page Two
��=
f. EDP Request f r rop sals Mr. McCauley will be present.
� F►�� � ����, �'-`.�`.�
g. Yo�kton F as bi it�tu y. (Resolution No. 5-88). `��
�� l 3
h. MPCA No se Re..ulations. --� 7� �� a
� �"''G"' i ,�.?�`r"`e y.�j � /�. �
i. Motor Vehicle Ordinance. (Ordinance No. 218) - Police Chief Delmont will
be prese �'
a� 1 C,,ti,t �C i.,O���f �`�`` "°�`p , -Q-`.�"""�, -"'�*-�
j. Public W r s Radio ystem. � D�� .
-L� � I
k. S�iburban Rate Authorit equest.
���
1. Hig ay 13 Tas rce.
� � .
m. Ri t�f-Way or Eide Lot.
o-
n. Un��2�e Co e. (Ordina�ce No. 219),
a''�� �-ovto
9. _Council Comments
10. �djourn. �' l�; � (�
�
� � — %�a-�-�. �0%� — �.,� '
�
�
��- /l6 � ���
� -�.:.� .�,� . �.�.
-��`-�`rl� 3 — �c.,w�-� � o�.�� � � �;�
.�� ' ` • - �
�,� �.;�
CITY O1� Mf:NDO'1'A HEiGH'I'S
MI:MU
T0:' Planning Commission
October 16, 1985
FROM: James E. Danielson and Paul R. Berg
Public Works Director Code Enforcement Officer
SUBJECT: Case No. g5-29, Linvill (Dakota Business Plaza) Sign Variance
DISCUSSION
Mr. Tom Melander of Linvill and Associates met with staff to discuss the
possibility of installing an identification sign for the Dakota Business Plaza�`
at 2401 Pilot Knob Road. The proposed sign is to be a ground sign which will be
6`8" high and 13'4" wide, (approximately 89 square feet of sign and 100 square
f eet are allowed). The sign is designed to be constructed of the same materials
as the existing building on the site.
The applicant is proposing to locate this sign by the south driveway on the
side property line. The Ordinance requires that signs be set back a minimum of
40 feet from a side lot line abutting a street. The City has been routinely
granting a 20 foot setback variance within the industrial park.
Mr. Linvill's parking lot extends all the way along his side lot line and is
set back 20 feet from Pilot Knob Road. If the City is to allow Mr. Linvill to have
a building identification sign along Pilot Knob Road that is not located in his
parking lot, the Commission will need to consider granting him a setback variance.
Because of the additional right-of-way other businesses located along Pilot
Knob Road have granted the County, signs have been setback from the original
property line and are much less than the required 40 feet (i.e., Fotomark and Snapo).
ACTION REQUIRED
Review the request with the applicant and make a recommendation to the City
Council.
;
JED/PRB:madlr ;
attachment
0
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGIITS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDGRATION
or
PLMINING REQUEST
Case No. �� � `� �1
Date of Ap�lication � a��s/�S
Fee Paid /�j , ��
Applicant � �, Iv�L� � �-1 P��- � ,
Name: DU
Last First Initial
Address: � 3� �v� T"� y� i!/ �' ,c" ��3 G�!"C/� � 1JfK5ul�ft� 3
Number & Street C ty State Zip
Telephone Number: ��� � S��`-�
Owner
Name : __��
2
Last First Initial
Address: Z�c� J�I /� 91tt�, ��-l�C7r Cf��'�-t- ./•.k l,��i S�l� ��-J, �%% 1�37
Number & Street City State Zip
Street Location of Property in Question:
/+
�`I�/ r�J)o� �����i ln��c' �'"i�uE�'`�.
LJ
. Legal Description of Property:
����" 7�
;? L,� �,"• '� ..�. L
��
Type of Request: Rezonin�;
'x ��ariance
�- Condi�ional Use PermiC
Condi�ional Use Permit for P.U.11.
� �(iilc�r Conditic�nal Use Permit
Sul�division ��nproval
Plan Approval.
Wetlands Permit
Other
CT.'I'Y Qf' Ml;NllO'CA HGICH'i'5
t�f 1?MU
Oct�ber 16, 1985
'I'0: Yl,�nning Commission
FKOM: James E. Danielson and P<iu 1 ft. Berg
Publ.ic Works Director Code EnEorcement Ofticer
SUI3.Jt:C'1': Case No. 85-28, Linsmayer, Variance
DISCUSSIUN
Mr. Linsmayer proposes to construct a single family home on Lot 17, Block 1,
Valley View Oak lst Addition. The lot is a corner lot with frontage on:Cu��ligan
Lane and Glenhill Road. The front lot line abuts Culligan Lane. Mr. Linsmayer
desires to use his legal rear lot line as a side lot line for setback purposes.
(See attached site plan).
The City has granted such variances in the past for corner lots if a rear
yard is provided along the remaining side lot line. Staff can see no technical
reason not to grant the 20 foot rear yard variance.
ACTION REQUIRGD
Review the request with the applicant and make a recommendation to Council.
•K
' �_
f
-r.;
� i :.j;`^-;i -., �^�--��:i s� F�-,..
c.%��:;f; �4`F:�'z" 4i
PI. JY ,��M,�,itl.-� .J... 'c, , ..
�
#�a''`�:.: .. ,� :;;,� :.s,:; '
i N;��X: �.7e 5w�c. r-C;:: .
. ��i
�e`,-.c ksY:�i';k`;: ': h'i ~ .
?,:,�i"` �.°;+ �. t�„�y� � �
/*^'/ •�' ^ . ` t.
�' ., , , r
- . . - .' ,. .: .... ' y.. • , , _ -
K J.` - .. �`�.'T �£r.0�?R£ LI$St:t- . . .. ;.�>... ..', .,;-;�, ,; .a'�- :_J`=? � ' ..a;''s . ' � .,.
, yP� � ., , �r ]} 020T1:t.I1p '• .w' : "7 cr�.a �' - _ < „. -. `� r ' �+'. , , .
' ' . . . S` . . b ,. �, � i s t �_ :.���t: =ii :�.r. r"Y�'� ..
, : _ ..,_ ._ � .. .. . . . .. � u._ .; ..Variance` ��� ;.:��� ;.-��,� - '�,,„„� , ,��..�. .
4 �' w -��i ' -+,: . , - r "—�-_�.YY,'= . '��x� �.:.;� �.<;•�: .;:s:.,: . . .. , ,.� _.. _.
; ,t<,:�� �_�`..ij; •. . _ �� CondiCioiial�Use-�Permit "` y `
, : #- ;. .. , � „ -� : : _ ,.. .: -- .....�. -
� " '��' -� ' • • � � � .� Conditional Use �Permit •for P.U.D.` �
-� =� • �`' �- :,; x'.' � ��.-�� .�;:�..�.., , " ;.:.,,,t:.�,�._:�..x�t�_ M3.nor�p�Conditioiial_;.Use,�Permit:.::��;�;_ _;_.�.� � �
4..,r�tt;?'s::i'.�.'n$.=::,i'�:s'",+.k:�§�;ci,�i�:±e.,ii.'`!. ` •, . ," . • "T°:! .,•r,;- c:-.s. :r..�.. __ , . _ �n<�> . '- . . '„�. . . .
, " - _. �._ �_ '= „ _.�� ,�,:;.,,..,�` ... , � . - - . . ,:. . Subdivisian . Approval . -t� ``� . +� , .. �
`,.
_ , �.R,,.' ::t .:,'� :r' '.i t'� x.: t ., , .. . .. . � ; • . . - , .�..: ..t_ :: . �
;a. _�u _ ;h , ._ - - � -� P1an Approval- `_`,' �r' r` , -�' - � .
' " Y.' - ' ' _ � rc ^.�'?4 ii. 9.'Y`i: ." «; .. : j.;. - . .
Y `{..'3'`�+'= 'S�,r�y :'. `k:�,L, �_i
i. f:_ ;Y' '�s' _•r1.'-r`h; - :LLr..i: � •x -,.f:%. "":}.!'x"�.t;,=`.�Wetl.arids� Permi.t"' _.r}�.'-��+;r..-�.c-.:5- .k','.� - '
' _ +yi.'hu.'�i-:i7,�� . . ...".t;: r.i. �'};.s �r�a..w.�., <i:. ,���„�r.F�'_:'r�...
�c : ' �. ' ;�.. ; �'.''.. - , U, t- �. . -i: �.:�...
X r ' .1. " .aX.. `'.K••
:'}' ..+:�. /'y �{.: .-y �
'��4�~ ";r";.: , '.�
T . , ' 3 - �^� • ;r�; � :4tir 'c+.
�^t'^ ., F "y; ^1.. 4 �;.:�i_. 'Y�.^,
w.Gs •� �"�' ��": Y..�;'�
-:y�; :.:1,. �.��', �r:C i".k. t �'ti ::1f
...'Y%` .:4`� , �:�, i'.:i'�V, �, r�:. . ,y,+..... �7
.�+ .,r.'f: ; r, -�t:. .. � . .,4 Pr .4, � : ia'��c. ' . r,:, . .�<_ . :��; r , e . .7�='a,; c�
��:, r�� ,n`i�' i-4�. �''f". �4' � .. :2' � - .i ..fi ��:.�#t,,:4. �,4�l�C..r�.:.�i
:�,f ;(k%. �ti.; s "+e?�I . �';�`. ..... . "C- � ' ;:"�? w ..r�...� .
�� iS.. ..>d, i- �,:A'��C.�. _ . « _ F .. .,.4.1.� ... _�... . _,.. . , _ ..�._�..._ .._ ._X .. .....!;y.'."aY�*.e...rei"�:.'::1�._.._i._:la..
�,�; :�•�,- .� *.. ,�. �,..,- ..
.,,t . _�,�: � ' � ; .,, `- . . _ crs.i>i•_
�'`:k` . :=,'s ' -.,:a-•: ,=s;, ��" `.x;::.� v .,r.
=r�: k:^i:', .y '+' ,. 'f :;� 'f�t:5. l+e 4i' �w�.' -=e `,'y+,,i.. ti;''rY"-: :�
'�,"'f•. _.3��'��`r.F�: ��#� ••c� ..'.��'.r�x.., . _ �:" c,.:ur -
;,�1' ',"i`_ "".* _ , . �s
ti'
w.. _ _ .;��_j:. ��'- - - -
"a�,+��r �i`^Y�n•.'_ - ;�.;..
_ ,y;;�:�i��'. '{� ., � s.r:: �- ' - - � �i
}; ' .. .�.. , . _ . - . `-,+'�:x:
^ ' _�• . .��' ` :^z:,-4 ";�'y�., �}-. . ,.:�, ...'s31�«�.r��".''%7
� � � `' � t:.. '
�;s: , - .. P ,. . .t i.,.
�� - =.'v: ?z;. �^.�+'� :>'r... §_.�i-�p {�'.- :c,<ac'r�� :;s:'s::.. ;ti
: � �.-x � , �; — -'.>. -
r� �� `c`:-�
�"�.. �^.�"� :r�,
t ' i.. ..4 ^ "Y LLti�. `e}�.:
•'Fv ''IlY 't-` .'1;. v.E � `Yf 4'. �:7�. �
:�t+ 'l'_M"'.M�Y. . �* -
� F T'ty.t. � `. :.�✓' . �:`: :."ri}.�- _ '"�i'} `:!Rx ' ""'11'%2.-:!
y. : r � ",'F :' _
�:M�. �.k.` "1�'r,r � );^ � ��"4^* i�l�r."`%:."'+
..i`i'v i�,`cN G' .1-^ ":%:,� �1. �"6 . -a : N;� . � �;dt:
� � � ''�.- f. .�' a nC�; �«" *�,�'w +. r".�.�....�s
.;aaF',�';�;�<.ri..Q,Y'�'y���Xs :r jr'�''.�}�etr F.aa:t�x'*+'�..r. �.,�,..i: � �,.,..� .�`'"A.i
' r,i�_ `:yE`, i}�, _ _ t :�Y : _ ;l:' -
, s �:. n�:; `� = �.t. ��';��Y�, ' . . .. ~��i:;.y
n ' � � ; 4 �''n . ' , _ i��
, - �ti.?� � �.i."']h.�•���3.st:.:��"" 'l::� :Y 1..;�..1 •6` �4i'v,`ti`"�J
• - v'V'�'Y�"•�:'.�rs _ ',w�SMt`.�s. _ yy.� fi...;:r, � s•,y�;:,,. , �"C . ...5 .. � ,7,._ .
..�~ .� �r'�.,^�: 3* . ,��
� P �,�A. �. .laY:.+v:#�.#-. 5... ":;;. .�u�iy rj� .k , .,..,t ��, ri .} . _ '�x � �t ^�,,'Y'.:
_ . 1,;.'�"� `-;:T.:..i:.i,'EA-t;:���i.:� ::#•s r's�,,i:• a-,s,.;..�.. ;�'y#tr- :k_ ' .t-'. . '->"�,F, i �:jY• .qw..
w � ,- ,. �• -�s:; . .. . , � � ,. .
},'% �13'!�'�,.i..'.�:, Y ` ^,'x ' " . s
,y .. ._. . , . _ . ' . .
_ _ _ _ _ __ .F' ,4:.
:P?r• - ' .'10''. .;.h. . - 1. [4,•;.�'z »:'T' .
- - " .r�'�:y'. ..i i: c :a< l`t�`Q�.�s >�:L; -
•�,f rr.:, ,.r • . ' - �
, `';:{_>;e '• - , �:", ,a;f - .
_ _ _ - { r"�_'`' , ' .
'�i�� ��� �''.s�.' �' ':k'�C,s,`.','.Y*,�^ �+�':'r'. - .
� �.w .f: ...: �,� �� s � � t. _
�:j... `;+.': � '; :.,M. 4i�r'. .it'^ : i' ' . -S, 1
, - '`"�,�.r.��'3�%^r:a d- ' 't�':' - ar`=. .
: ti� -.Sy<' K� _ ,3 �
�.xr k.�5, . 3 - F.r,Y'r.s' _ 1S?=i•�"`.. .i%�,+^..`
. .'L5' st':
!.C'""'h . ''C` _ .ri
':.).~ � _ a'J. ':t�� "'..::1
�''Yh, �'h. ,,Pf:..." .�
-`+�=i y .w'
�
'_.^,�'�., iipa:.: ..�� ..�`.r �^.�,.,` �� .�,x
�� >�'i`'�•'-t3ii�.5��'•?�4 ::n. � �:y;,�;# r .� _ �r•z:?r'�tf.�- _.� �.s�� =; `
e. e{i-K�._ ��.. ��' +e�':l,« �,i .�`•.;.f:�i:.a� ' _ '
'�y°. .!,�,: "�T_ �.:�, x'•. - �,f:; . i - _
3�;?1� r:s` -;yry}•Y2;. •?�,.A`rb•:` -:'J 3' »�rV � *�?' .
:.i-�'F.'",,s°::�{., ir':-k:.� - . �' , `,°A.,;y,"
::l,ret ` � ' R:(Y•t4�:9.;4"'.���.�rry: a•lk �i� ••.! ,�� f ' I•,.:. - .
:�C° ,.�k : iJ: �y'`'3.: - .
:�itr i. F' i'CL •.�+. !.� t .. , -
�;;'`;r:.' xa %?;'�sc�','�.y3,:� 3;�i'`+r7'h"' •' b..4�-=:<' :d.. .:.;t" „s
j� S,�.R. ..1'.aw
'i: Zy)'.�a ;.ar?r'� �.�n ��4�1 '.1�-ih: '`?.y�.d.� ..y.' �
lyi ( 'y°t�{� ..kl�`'f' $' 3' ' t` '
��:'R` "-���Rtt..: %,:t'.: Qi � '�' r y��:4' �3 '�R' a�i I K!y_ t":;`v.ai� . .
.��s�!4:�: "1,�."Z- . . , bi. °•S� ...
,^..- � - "i .:�� n. ` f�; "� - 5 ,.
{`' :�'t I+y•'i••�.. �� "' ' . - . , n + 4
};
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES, OCTOBER 22, 1985
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was called
to order by Chairperson Kruse at 8:03 o'clock P.M. The following members were
present: Kruse, Frank, Henning, McMonigal, Morson, and Stefani. Burke had advised
the Commission that he would not be present. Also present were Planner Dahlgren and
Public Works Director Danielson.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of the September 24 meeting had been submitted
previously, _
Commissioner Stefani moved approval of the minutes as submitted
Commissioner Morson seconded the motion.
Ayes: 6
Nays: 0
Minutes of the special September 25 meeting had been
submitted previously.
Commissioner Henning moved approval of the minutes as submitted
Commissioner Morson seconded the motion.
Ayes: 6
Nays: 0
CASE ��85-28, LINSMAYER, Mr. Nicholas�Linsmayer was present to request a variance to
VARIANCE construct a single family home on Lot 17, Block 1, Valley
View Oak within 10 feet of his legal rear yard. He explained
that his lot was a corner lot and that he would provide a 30
foot rearyard area along his side yard, instead of his legal
rear yard.
Ayes: 6
Nays: 0
Chairperson Kruse noticed from the contour map that the rear
yard area had steeper slopes and asked how useable the space
would be. Mr. Linsmayer responded that he had walked the
area with his architect and that it was useable.
Commissioner Henning noted the lot was in the Critical Area
Corridor and asked how close the proposed home would be to
the 407 slope. Planner Dahlgren statedtha•t the 40% slope was
some distance away and would not be a factor in siting the
home.
Commissioner Stefani had visited the site and stated that he
felt that constructing two more homes between the two exist-
ing homes (Swanberg and Culligan) would be crowded. Mr.
Linsmayer stated that he had a right of f irst refusal on
Mr. Culligan's vacant lot, and in the event Mr. Culligan
decided not to build, he would purchase the lot for open
space.
Commissioner Henning moved to recommend granting a 20 foot
rear yard variance Subject to the applicant providing a 30 foot
backyard area along his west side yard.
Commissioner Frank seconded the motion.
�':; Planning Commission Minutes, October 22, 1985 Page Two
CASE N0. 85-29, LINVILL, Tom Melander, Linvill Associates, and Jim Griggs from
SIGN VARIANCE, DAKOTA LeRoy Signs, Inc., were present to request a variance to
BUSINESS PLAZA construct a ground sign for the Dakota Business Plaza at a
zero setback. They presented photographs of the area with
the proposed sign location shown by stakes in the ground.
They stated that to put the sign at the allowable setback
would be to have the sign in the middle of their parking lot.
Commissioner Stefani asked Planner Dahlgren what he thought
the problems might be with approving this request.
Ayes: 6
Nays: 0
VERBAL REVIEW
MISCELLANEOUS
ADJOURN
Ayes: 6
Nays: 0
Planner Dahlgren said that there are two existing pylon
signs along Pilot Knob Road with zero setbacks, but those wer.e
approved at locations where there was exceptionally wide
right-of-way widths. He felt that approving this request
for a ground sign where there was not that condition could set
a precedent.
Commissioner Stefani stated that he would be willing to
consider a variance that pushed the sign as far back as
possible from the property line and still be visible and
effective.
Commissioner Frank moved to recommend granting a 28 foot
variance to the setback requirement allowing the sign to
be installed 12 feet from the Pilot Knob Road right-of-way
subject to the sign being placed on bermed ground no more
than two feet higher than now proposed.
Commissioner Morson seconded the motion.
Public Works Director Danielson reviewed the cases that
had appeared before the City Council.
Planner Dahlgren updated the Commission on the Council's
amendments to the South East Area study.
Commissioner Henning stated that unlike what was being
stated at the City Council meeting, many noisy aircraft will
be around until the turn of the century. He said much of th'e
current problem could be reduced or eliminated by changing
"course rules" to require aircraft to take off toward Mendota
Heights and then follow TH 55 through Eagan's Industrial
Park. Many airports have strict course rules such as this.
There being no further business to come before the Co�nission,
Commissioner Henning moved that the meeting be adjourned.
Commissioner Morson seconded the motion.
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:20 P.M.
yi �
:•;�
:,; �
Y;::
;:�
:,:�
a�
�
C:�:
f'
PLANNING RSPORT
DATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
22 October 1985
85-28
Nicholas J. Linsmayer
Southwest Corner of
Culligan Lane and Glen
Hill Road
Approval of the Rear Yard
Variance
1.• This property, a single family residential lot at the
southwest corner oP Culligan Lane and Glen Hill Road, was a
part of the original plat developed by Doctor Culligan about
five years ago. Larry Culligan, Doctor Culligan's son, owns
the property to the south and resides in the large single
family home on the west side of Glen Hill Road, south of the
subjeet property. Larry Culligan has platted portions of
his land and proposes to construct a new home to the north
of his present house, which will be directly south of the
property in question.
2. In order to provide adequate space for this home (north of
Larry's home), a portion of the property in question was
attached to Larry's new lot on the west side of Glen Hill.
Under separate cover is a site plan of the proposed
structure to be built on the property in question by the
applicant, Mr. Linsmayer. You will notice that on the site
plan a portion of the lot on the south side has been added
to the property to the south.
3. Mr. Linsmayer's initial proposal was to construct his home
at the far southwest corner of his property with the
residence being located 10 feet from the westerly lot line
and 10 feet from the southerly lot line. Mr. Linsmayer
proposed locating his house in that fashion so as to
maximize the view, whieh is basically direetly west.
4. The southerly portion of the lot is the rear yard, in the
case of this corner lot, in as much as the frontage on
Culligan Lane is less than that of Glen Hill Road. The rear
yard setback in the city for a single family residential lot�
is 30 feet.
�
LINSMAYER, 85-28
P,age �
5. We have discussed this proposal with Mr. Linsmayer on two
occasions and have suggested that he move the structu
easterly so as to achieve a 30 foot setback on the west si.
of the lot, thus allowing for some back yard which will
relate directly to the walkout basement level on the
westerly side of the house. Mr. Linsmayer's current plans
propose such a 30 foot setback on the west side, which we
feel will compensate for the lack of adequate rear yard on
the south side of the house.
6. The action requested, then is for a variance to the rear
yard setback from 30 feet to 10 feet. This could be
approved on the condition that the side yard setback to the
house on the west side of the property be a minimum of 30
feet. In effect then, we will be substituting the back yard
area on the west side of the house for that which would
normally be required on the south side.
Under separate cover are letters from the applicant, Larry
Culligan, a sketch of the floor plans of the house, a site
plan, and a survey of the property.
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
COPPERFIELD
TH�S DECLARATION, made this day of . 1985,
by Copperfield Associates, a Minnesota partnership. [hereinafter referred to as
"Declarant"].
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of that certain real estate located in
the County of Dakota. State of Minnesota. and legally described as follows:
:�
Blocks 1. 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, Copperfield, according to the plat thereof now
� on file in the office of the County Recorder for Dakota County. Minnesota,
[hereinafter referred to as the "premises"J:
NOW. THEREFORE. Declarant hereby declares that the premises shall
hereafter be held, sold, and conveyed subject to the following convenants, restrictions,
h)
and conditions, which are for the purpose of protecting the value and desirability
of, and which shall run with the premises and be binding on all parties having any
right, title, or interest in the premises or any part thereof. their heirs, successors.
and assigns, and shall inure for the benefit of each owner thereof.
t. Land Use and Building Type. No lot shal) be used except for residential
purposes. No building shall be erected, altered. placed, or permitted to remain on
any lot other than [i] one detached, single-family dwelling; and [iiJ a private garage,
either attached or detached, provided, however, that any purchaser of a lot from
Declarant who erects a dwelling thereon may use such dwelling as a model for a
period not exceeding 12 months from the date of completion of such dwelling.
.f • +
�.' For purposes of this Declaration the term "lot" shall mean any lot
within Blocks, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 as shown on the recorded plat of
CopperField.
2. Dwelling specifications. No dwelling shall be erected, aitered or
placed on a lot or permitted to rernain there other than one detached single-family
� dwelling not to exceed two stories in height, as measured from grade. In the event
�
the dwelling includes a walk-out basement to the rear, the basement shall not be
counted as a story. Such dwelling may have an attached garage for not more than
3 cars (but not a detached garage), and may have an attached or detached building
for storage purposes. If the dwelling has one story [whether all on one level as in:.
a rambler or on different levels as in a split-IevelJ, excluding any walk-out basement.�
the first floor area shaGl be at least 1,300 square feet. If the dwelling has two stories,
excludirig any walk-out basement, the combined total floor area of the first and
second floors shall be at least 1,700 square feet. The first floor area described in
the pneceding two sentences shall be exclusive of breezeways, open porches or garages.
All structures constructed or placed on the property shall be completely finished
on the exterior thereof within nine months after commencement of construction.
3. No Temporary Structures. No trai ler, basement, tent, shack, garage
or any other structure of a temporary character shall be used on any lot at any ti .me;�.
as a temporary or permanent residence.
4. Building Location. No building shall be located on any lot nearer
to a front lot line, a rear lot line, an interior side lot :line or nearer to a side stree,t�...
right of way line, i� any than the applicable city ordinance, as relates to this subject
plat, shall allow.
For purposes of the covenants and restrictions set forth in this
paragraph 4, eaves, steps, fireplaces, and open porches shall not be considered as ..
part of a building, provided, however, that this shall not be contrued to permit any
eave, step, fireplace, or open porch on a lot to encroach upon another lot.
2
5. Easements for Utilities and Drainage. Utility, drainage and scenic
easements are reserved as shown on the recorded plat of Copperfield. Within such
easements no building, structure, planting, fill, or other material shall be placed
on, or permitted to remain, which may damage or interfere with the installation
and maintenance of utilities, or which may change the direction or impede the flow
of water over the drainage easements. Such easements shall be maintained
continuously by the owner of the lot which is subject to said easements except that
such owner shall not be responsible for those imporovements for which a public
authority or utility company has assumed responsibility.
6. Nuisances. No noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on upon
any lot, nor shall anything be done thereon which is or may become an annoyance
or nuisance to any owner of any lot.
7. Signs. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on
any lot except one sign of not more than five square feet advertising the property
for sale or rent, o� signs used by a builder to advertise the property during the
construction and sales pe�iod. This restriction shall not apply to permanent entrance
monuments which may be approved by the City of Mendota Heights and erected
by the Declarant.
e. Livestock and Poultry. No animals, livestock, or poultry of any kind
shall be raised, bred, or kept on any lot, except that dogs, cats and other household
pets may be kept provided that they are not kept, bred or maintained for any
commercial purpose. Dog kennels are prohibited.
9. Garbage and Refuse Disposal. Trash, garbage or toher waste shall
be kept in sanitary containers. All equipment for storage or disposal of such material
shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition, and screened Prom public view.
3
�
r:
� 10. Radio, Satellite and Television Antennae, etc. No radio or television ' "'
broadcasting or receiving antenna or other similar apparatus shall extend more than
six feet above the roof of the dwelling located on the lot on which said antenna
or similar apparatus is located.
11. Recreational Equipment. Recreational equipment is defined for the
purposes of this Declaration as travel trailers, pickup campers or coaches, vans,
motorized dwellings, tents, trailers, fish houses, boats and trailers, all of which
must be less than seven feet in height above the ground. No recreational equipment
shall be used on a lot for living, sleeping or housekeeping purposes. No such equipment
shall be parked as permitted herein unless it is in condition for safe and effective
performance for the function for which it is intended. Recreational equipment whicli�r`
is parked on a lot for a cumulative period of 30 days or more in any calendar year
will be treated for purposes of this Declaration as being stored. No recreational
equipment may be stored on a lot unless completely enclosed in a garage or accessory
structure.
12. � Architectural Control Committee.
a. There is hereby created an Architectural Control committee
["Committee"J which shall initially be composed of the following:
Name
Richard A. Putnam
James L. Ostenson
Steve T. Ryan
Address �
6440 Flying Cloud Drive, �k 106
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
6440 Flying Cloud Drive, 106
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
P.O. Box 40
Excelsior, MN 55331
.��-r.�.
:�.x
A majority of the Cornmittee may designate a representative to act
for it. In the event of death or resignation of any member of the Committee, the
4+�
4 �
�
-- ' �remaining member or members shall have full authority to designate a successor
or successors. Neither the members of the Committee, nor its designated
representative, shall be entitiled to any compensation for services performed pursuant
to this Declaration. At any time after 90% of the lots affected by this Declaration
have been sold by the Declarant or its successors and assigns, to owners who reside
in dwellings constructed on said lots, then such owners of a majority of all of the
lots affected by this Declaration shall have the power to change the membership
of the Committee, eliminate the Committee or modify its powers and duties. Such
action shall be effective only when evidenced by an instrument which has been
executed by such owners of a majority of the lots and recorded in the office oF the
County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota.
b. No building. fence or wall shall be erected, place or altered on any
lot until the plans and specifications and a plan showing the location of the structure,
elevations, and finished grade levels have been approved as provided in Subparagraph
c below by the Committee as to [i] quality and type of workmanship and materials.
[ii) external design and harmony with any existing structure, and [iii] location with
respect to topography and finish grade elevation. Accompanying such documentation,
.�
shall be the name and address of the party to whom approval or disapproval is to
be mailed. Approval or disapproval will be effective on date of postmark when mailed
`< by first class mail, postage prepaid. and addressed to the named party. Plans and
' specifications and site plans shall be deemed to have been redceived by the Committee
when one or more of the Committee members or its designated representative
acknowledges receipts of such documents in writing.
c. The Committee's approval or disapproval shall be in writing. In the
event the Committee fails to approve or disapprove the plans and specifications
and site plans within 30 days after the same have been submitted to it, or in any
event, if no suit to enjoin the �ubject construction has been commenced prior to �
the completion thereof, approval will not be required and the restrictions, covenants,
and conditions set forth in this document shall be deemed to have been complied
with.
5 '
r 1 '
�-
�
+ Y.,'kT
13. Term. These covenants, restrictions, and conditions are to run with
the land and shall be binding on all parties and al) persons claiming under them for
a period of thirty years from the date these covenants, restrictions, and conditions
are recorded, after which time the same shal) be automatically extended for
successive periods of 10 years unless an instrument signed by the then owners of
a majority of the (ots has been recorded, agreeing to change the same in whole or
in part.
14. Enforcement. Enforcement shall be by proceedings at (aw or in equity
either to restrain violation or to recover damages, against any person or personsz .
.. ,.
violating or attempting to violate any covenant, restriction or condition.
15. Severability. Invalidation of any one of these covenants, �estrictions
or conditions by judgement or court order shall in no wise affect any of the other
provisions which shall remain in full force and effect.
Copperfield Associates has caused this Declaration to be excuted the day
and year first above written.
COPPERFIELD ASSOCIATES, a general partnership
- :51,"L.,.
By Tandem Corporation. Inc., a partner
By
Lyman Lumber Company, a partner
�
a'.e �
• M:4+,
By -
.,..,.
By
0
, . �. . . �,
ACKNOWLE�GEMENTS
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF DAKOTA
The foregoing instruement was acknowledged before me this
day of 1985, by the
of . a Minnesota
corporation, on behalf of the corporation, as partner o� Cooperfield Associates.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of , 1985 by and , a
Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation, as partner of Copperfield
Associates.
Notary Public
7
: :- ,
� DEVELOPER'S A[3REEMENT CONCERNINO SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT
� ON THE 37 ACRES LOCATEO IN THE NORTH PART OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER [NEI/4� OF SECTION 36. TZBN. R23W,
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
This Agreement, made and entered into this day of , 1985,
by and between the City of Mendote Heights. Dakota County. Minnesota.
[hereinafter called the "City"] and c/o Copperfield Associates, 6440 Flying Cloud
Drive, Eden Preirie, Minnesote 55344, [hereinafter calied the "Developer"J.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer proposes a plat for a single family development in Mendota
Heights to be known as Mendota Ferms Addition. consisting oF 56 single family
lots on approximately 37 acres in the northeast quarter [NEI/4] of Section 36.
in Mendota Heights, mare particulerly shown on the plat known as Copperfield,
previously known as Mendota Farms Addition: and
�t�' WHEREAS, public services are needed by the Developer from Mendota
Heights in order to proceed with said development;
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the two parties
as follows:
1. Developer will petition the City for needed public improvements
(Sanitary Sewer. Storm Sewer. Watermains, and 5t�eets). Developer
agrees to pay �8.400.00 escrow to the City as per Ordianence 1503.
2. Developer will provide et no cost to the City all needed temporary
construction easements to install seid improvements and those
permanent, right of way and easements, necessery for said public
i mprovements.
} , 1
0
0
3. Mendota Heights will p�aceed as expeditiously as possible with
hearings or 100% petitions and such additional proceedings es msy
be required to cause public improvements to be instelled.
4. Developer will proceed immedietely to commission a registered
land surveyor to place enough lot corners so that street centerlines
can be located by City Staff.
5. Where site grading occurs, the Developer agrees to protect the
environment by the use of good erosion control methods. Minimum
�_ erosion control requirements will consist of top dressing, seeding
and mulching of disturbed areas within 30 deys oP site work
completion, as well as the use of staked hay bales where concentrated
surface water runoff takes plece [per grading planJ.
6. Developer intends to begin construction of 2 of 3 model hornes
on Lots before final plat appraval. The City is willing to
'�i•
allow that construction to commence with the understanding that
there may be conflicts between the City's contractor and the
Develaper's and that any damage done to the public facilities by
the Developer or his contractor will be corrected by the City and
costs charged to the Developer.
7. Developer acknowledges that there will be a park contribution
due to the City. That contribution is to be determined by the City
Council in conjunction with the City's Park end Recreation
Commission before the City will sign the finel plat.
8. Developer .agrees to be respansible for the construction costs
essociated with inco�porating the storm drainage fram the
Montgomery Addition end Weed property into this development
at no cost to the adjacent property owners.
2
• • " 9.
r
10.
Mendota Heights agrees upon receipt of request by Opus Corporation
to respread equally, on e per acre basis, the assessments presently
levied against this percel end the adjacent 100 acre parcel owned
by Opus Corporetion.
The proposed pedestrian trails within the street right of way as
shown on exhibit B and through the public pe�k and the street trail
will be installed with str t construction by the city contractor
to a 5 foot width of e alt construction.
The perk trail will be installed by the city contractor to an 8 foot
width and esp It construction. The cost of the 8 foot trail will
be credited to the developers park fee alang with the value of the
y+ acres of land dedicated for park.
11. The developer agrees to move tree end/or shrubs f�om the property
to the side yard of Mr. 6 Mrs. Gilbertson to provide a natural
a.ppearance and buffer. The exact trees/srubs and number of each
is not determined, but the intent is to spend a day with a�ree
� mover on the site. The developer will pay the cost and Gilbertson
will select with the developer's egreement, the trees/shrubs and
planting locations.
COPPERFIELD ASSOCIATES
Tandem Corporation
ey
�cs
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
Kevin D. Frazell. City Administrator
Lyman Lumber Company
By
irg
PETITION FOR SANITARY, STORM SEWER, WATER,
AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND WAIVER OF HEARING
The undersigned, being the owner of the following described property
situated in the City of Mendota Heights, in the County of Dakota and State
of Minnesota, to-wit:
Northeast Quarter (NE1/4 of Section 36, Township 28, Range 23
Pursuant to the provisions of M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the undersigned
hereby petitions the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights to con-
struct and extend said City's Sanitary and Storm Sewer, Water, and Street
Systems so as to directly serve the above described property and to assess
the entire cost of said improvements (including the cost of any land or
easement acquisition incurred by reason thereof) against said property. The
undersigned hereby further specifically waives the requirement of any hear-
ing and said improvements and assessments therefore and further waives the
requirement of publication and mailed notice of or with respect to any such
. hearing or hearings.
The undersigned further agrees to donate to the City of Mendota Heights
any easements over the above described property required for said project.
Dated:
TANDEM CORPORATION
By
Its
�
• L I
PLANNING RBPORT
DATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
22 October 1985
85-29
Ralph W. Linvill
West of Pilot Knob Road,
Opposite Transport Drive
(see sketch)
Approval of Variance to
Sign Setback
1. The property in question has been recently developed by
Ralph Linvill. The structure is an office service building
with over 50 percent offices orienting toward Pilot Knob
Road. The structure will be known as "Dakota Business
Plaza".
2. For process for developing the site, Mr. Linvill dedicated
17 feet of additional right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road on
the west side. His parking is setback the required 20 feet
from the new right-of-way and he now proposes to place a
sign (as was originally proposed in his site plan) 17 feet
from the old right-of-way. The sign, proposed to be a
ground sign, measuring 13 feet � inches in width with a
height of 6 feet 8 inches. The sign is to be constructed of
the same masonry material as the structure� with the sign
base to be done in the saare gray textured block, with the
lighter blue masonry for the sign itself.
3• The sign area will be 87.78 feet.
4. Ordinarily, the sign regulation would allow for a 100 square
foot sign on a pylon 25 feet high. In the past, the city
has normally allowed ground signs to be closer to the
right-of-way, a policy that has been consistently applied
within the United Properties Business Center to the east and
south. Having received this application on October 16, we
have not been able to field check the location of existing
signs on the west side of Pilot Knob Road. We will,
however, attempt to do that prior to the Planning Commission
meeting on October 22. �
■ tN�;;!
`�.
.%a> �}.' � �
� � . � i: Y. :.
30 ?.
9
i. a ., ' ,
`, °. � •
-�� ' I �}� ` •.. ` '��`
is ��
F �� ; � �, '. „�, ..:. :, . `, �S, • .
� . ;�,� .�r. • • i �
� ; �1, � ;��s.t�'• 0 �'"� � ��
_ - f �� ".. e .:�`; i ; �' � i
— �" " '" „�" '�t w ,.<iJ :L..tA`� lr.!t+eXfi I ��. ���
� ` � ' r, � sS =� � � . . �..
�� i• � ��
� , ` 4 t4 �..� ; ' ' •
� x ,
. :r'� �tiRt��
� ��Y. 3� i��S ' � t
� ..+� l�aUai. � ,i
�'..•� �`\��` +�-� •-
• ��- ,,��
�3+ �` �s i Y „`
t �,� �, � r`. r .
�,S'" S �', 't, �?�^'� : ,e. ,
�. , it i Tr
�.F,� �:.. , �, �,�;L '.'�Y�
+r . �
'i1`!,$c �� t �`i�,2t Y
_ � a� � � � � ,t y��
� '� f .-.f � j.�i �
+'�r�~rF•.�t• �� k`i��
�•f5'i`4., �t ....; ., ti' ,.'t�
�/�I'�% �
�, i:� , . =� �,.� �i
�"�"_ � '1y
+�t i Y'
,�'� � � ,� y` l�
��.�� :� °�
� Ix K'• �
� 'i �.�:.
,' ,`;`� � i *��� �,r
�+�`yr` t"wit '��n ' e. v�•iit+i`:;�
��� �'-tr� � I; .i•t'� ,`�1Q s::t il ��$.4.
Ata;•„�; r:3„�.a.;�„� Y
zs +� � ��*
�_ +�t�"�' ��'����.����.••'� ! i4S
.� :;�e.�.,r :
� � • � � ���3 `' i. i ,.��.
"� w."4�t..
- �'."y'•
r ,
Y`
Consulting Planners One Groveland Terrace (612 377- 5 �
Minneapolis
Minnesota 55403
Dahlgren, Sha�dlow, and Uban/Incorporated
yl�y� i : ►��� .r�
DATE:
T0:
FROM:
RE:
i
October 22, 1985 '
Howard
Phil
Sign Setbacks on Pilot Knob Road/ Mendota Heights
I checked business si�s on Pilot Knob Road in Mendota Heights from I-49�+
north to the railroad tracks, and found seven major permanent signs. This
does not include temporary leasing signs. I measured the setbacks of these
existing signs both from the centerline of Pilot Knob Road and from at
lea.st one other per�anent feature along the roadway.
On the west side of Pilot Knob Road there are two rows of telephone poles;
one fl,om about T�^ansport Road south which is set further out, varying fran
50' to 70' from the centerline. The inner set, at the north end by the
Dakota Business Center, is about 28' fY�om the centerline, or 5' inside the
old 33' right-of-way.
Distance from
Centerline of Distance
Sig�r Pilot Knob from:
Mdta Hts. Bus. Pk(S) 110 feet 17 feet
Airport Bus. Plaza* 100 feet
Mdta Hts. Bus. Ctr 90 feet
Pilot Knob Bus. Ctr* 80 feet
Mdta Hts. Bus. Pk(N) 92 feet
S�apo Rivet & Tool 70 feet
Foto Mark, Ine.
Dakota Bus. Ctr.
62 feet
50 feet
30 feet
25 feet
9 feet
27 feet
17 feet
12 feet
35 feet
22 Peet
0 feet
Feature
Fence
Outer Tel. Pole
Sidewalk(outer edge)
Outer Tel. Pole
Sidewalk(outer edge)
Outer Tel. Pole
Outer Tel. Pole
Inner Tel. Pole
Inner Tel. Pole
Outer Tel. Pole
* These two signs on the west side of Pilot Knob, either side of Northland
Drive, appear to be at or inside the new right-of-way line (scaled fran
u00' scale m�ap)
�'f
��� : �' _ _ _ -
•i j � i �
./,f �_� _ w
i� �A � ; �.
1:; -'':i;;
,;;
. %'� %' i
;;
, ..;�%i`
-�� �■1■!�!,raif:C.i�7:i�:�1i��:
Snapo � �
� '
usi e�s C nt I�
4�rnbrt Busimess iP
nenva�ia n
3usin��c F
:'s
OPUS CORPORATION �
DESIGNEFiS � BUILDERS • DEVELOPERS
October 23, 1985
James Danielson
City of Mendota Heights
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Dear Mr. Danielson:
In connection with the development approvals sought by Tandem
� Corporation for our property in the vicinity of Delaware Avenue
and Huber Drive, Opus Corporation requests that the outstanding
special assessment balance on the two parcels (Parcel numbers
27-03600-011-04-7 and 27-3600-010-01-6) be respread on an area
basis against the entire 137 acres.
Please let me know if you require anything additional.
Sincerely,
.. � �,�C�
Mi hele Foster
Assistant Director
Real Estate Development
- MF/hl , -
cc: Jim Ostenson
MWNGAPUUS • i;II1CA(in • PHOENIX • fdltVJ�UY.f.0
CXECUTIVI: qhFICG:i l30U OPUS C[NTCH • 9900 HRC�J qOAD LAST • PO BOX i:N) � 1A�fJ�JE'AI'(1LIS. MINNESOTA ,55440 (612) 936�anqa
�
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION N0. 85—
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR COPPERFIELD SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, a final plat for Copperfield Subdivision has been submitted to
the Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said final plat and finds the
same to be in order.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the final plat of Copperfield Subdivision submitted at this
meeting be and the same is hereby approved.
2. That the appropriate City official be and they are hereby author—
ized to execute the final plat on behalf of the City of Mendota
Heights.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 3rd day of
December, 1985.
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
�� j
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 23, 1985
TO: Meyor, City Council, City
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
Ad '�tr�tor
SUBJECT: Motor Vehicle Ordinance
DISCUSSION
On October 1st Council tabled indefinitely discussion on the proposed
motor vehicle ordinance. The tabling occurred both because Council did not
have adequate time to review the draft and because of the lengthy agenda
and acticipated lengthy October 15th agenda.
The November Sth agenda is also substantial, but we believe the
ordinance to be of enough signi£icance, particularly with regard to the
section relating to snowfall removal and snowbird violations, to be
included in this agenda. Publication�of an ordinance must occur before it
can become effective, and we hope to be able to affect enforcement with the
first significant snow£all o£ the season.
INFORMATION
The attached draft is substantiall.y the same as that which was
distributed with the October lst agenda�(typographical errora corrected),
however it incorporates the corrected section 3 which was addressed in the
add-on agenda memo. In the earlier veraion bold type atyle was used to
enhance the type £or all new language: bold type is used in the attached
document only to highlite new aectiona. � •
i.,,
x ��`
RECOMMENDATION/ACTION REQUIRED '�� `�^�
--------------------- -------- ,
,.w.
,�,.
�.� p proposed
If Council concurs in staff's recommendation to ado t the
motor vehicle ordinance it should take the,�.following action: .-
1. Move adoption of Ordinance No. 218, "AN ORDINANCE REPEALING
CERTAIN MOTOR VEHICLE AND PARKINGj`ORDINANCES." •�
a �`
2. Move adoption of Ordinance No. 219i"AN ORDINANCE REGULATING'MOTOR
VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC," and to auth rize summary publication in a
t.
£orm prepared by the City Attorney.� =
�
� 3. Move to re-number all remaining ordinances �in Section
' City's Code of Ordinances. .
7r
m
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 23, 19$5
T0: Mayor, Cit Co wncil and Cit A�ini�rator
Y Y�
� FROM: James E. Danielsan
Public Works Director
StJBJECT: Linsmayer, Variance
Case No. 85-28
DISCUSSION:
At their October meeting the Planning Commissian considered a 20 foot
rear yard varaance request from Nick Linsmayer ior a corner lot Iocated at
the sauthwest quadrant af Culligan Lane and Glenhill Road.
Subject to the applicant providing a 30 foot rear yard area along the
side yard Che Planning Commission voted unanimously �o recommend approval of
his variance reques�.
RE�OMMENDATION:
The Planning Cor�nission unana.mousl.y recammends granting a 20 foot rear
yard variance.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If the City Council wishes ta implement the Planning Commission's
recommendation they should pass a motion granting a 20 faot rear yard set-
back variance, subject to a 30 foot area being pravided alang the west side
yard, for Lat 17, Block l, Valley View Oaks lst Addition.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
N�MO
October 23, 1985
T0: Mayor, City Council and City �r�t�tor
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Dakota Business Plaza - Sign Variance
Case No. 85-29
DISCUSSION:
The Planning Commission considered this variance at their October
' meeting. The Planning Commission members felt uncomfortable with granting a
variance to allow a zero setback so the applicant agreed to move the sign 12
feet back from the right-of-way line. With that condition the Planning
Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval to City Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council grant a 28
foot sign setback variance for Dakota Business Plaza, 2401 Pilot Knob Road.
;, ACTION REQUIRED:
If the City Council wishes to implement the Planning Commission recom-
mendation they should pass a motion approving a 28 foot sign setback vari-
ance for 2401 Pilot Knob Road.
C'!� J� � �, `I. . ,, J
Consuiting Planners One Groveland Terrace 612 377- 5
Minneapolis
Minnesota 55403
Dah{gren, Shard{ow� and Uban/Incorporated
� �•: I11
DATE: October 23, 1985
1�0: Mayor, City Council, and Planning Co�ission,
City of Mendota Heights
FROM: Howard Dahlgren, City Planning Con.sultant
• -' •>
• RE: Southeast Area, Implementation oP Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Ordinance Char�ges
m
Introductian
• The Cameil, in its actions at the October 15 meeting, gave us direction
for the standards to be inoot-porated into the C.ompc�herLsive Plan and new
Zoning Districts relating to the Southeast Area. To accomplish this
_�;; purpose, �re propose the follaring:
1) An Addend�t to ti�e Com�c�er�sime Pl.an for the South�st Ar� will be
prepared �ich �rill address the issues raised by the study, rather
t�han 6�oing into the original Cocopc�erLsive Plan and amending it
Pieceneal. A draPt oP this dddendun follaws.
2) The Goals and Policies in this dddendum will reflect both the
g+eneral aims for the Soutiiea,st Acea and the specific development
standai�ds to be encouraged.
3) Three aes+ Zoning Districts �rill be prepared: IDi-PpD, Kt-P�, and
Ottice-P[�, being Planned Unit Development Zoning,Distriets which
Will apply to the High Density Residential areas, Medi�.m Density
Residential ar�s, and the Limited Business (Office) areas
respeetively.
4) The present zoning for the entire Southeast Area wfll r�emain as the
imderlying zoning for the ar� until ,r.ezoned at the discretion of
the Co�meil Lnder the nesa PUD Zones Whieh are oonsistent with the
nesi ci�anges in the Compreher�s i ve Plan .
5) The existing R-3 Zaning District Will be amended to inelude language
relating to the requested reduetion in density and other development
eriteria.
South�st Area/ Comprehensive Pl,an and Zoning Implementation 2
6) The existing R-2 T�,►o Family Zoning District will be amended to serve
as the Medivar Density Residential (MR) District.
7) A new Comprehensive Plan designation will be added, called LR-II
LoW Den.gity Residential, which will be guided for two units/acre.
This will be the designation for the area north of Mendota Heights
Road and east oP Huber Drive.
8) A new Zoning District corr�sponding to this LR-II designation will
be added, to be called the R-1C District, requiring 20,000 square foot
minimum lots. �
�
The purpose of the Comprehensive Plan is to set forth the "official
• policies Por the physical development of Mendota Heights", and these
policies are "intended to be implemented through the adoption of the Land
Use Plan and the use of effectuating regulations" (quotations from the 1979
Ccmprehensive Plan). The Zoning Ordinance is then the tool for developing
these effeetuating regulations.
Some of the standards recently expressed in the Council's actions on the
Southeast Area are already mentioned in the 1979 Comprehe�sive Plan, and
are cited below, as well as other examples which apply to`the issues �-
raised:
Under Section A, (�IERAI. GOAIS, one of the goals is :
" 1. Maintain the commtu�ity character and identity." ��`�'
�� r
Beneath these gaals are �pporting (�idelines which expand on some of the -
details of this goal, one of which is: .�
" 3. Continue the emphasis on quality design, innovative solutions,
and a high g+eneral aesthetic level in conanunity development through
the development of site design standards and review of the '���
development by the City." .
Under Seetion B, R�STi)FNI'TA1- GOAIS is the goal:
" 1. To perpetuate a quality residential environment."
The Supporting (�idelines inelude:
_ .�..
" 7. Pursue high standar�ds of residential development in the City.
9• Promote non-discriminatory housing practices.
10. Promote innovative planning and design solutions."
There is one F�IVIRON�ITAL At� APPCARANCE GOAL, which reads:
" To preserve and enhance the natural beauty, uniqueness, and
attractive appearance of the Co�nunity."
Southeast Area/ Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Implementation 3
Its Supporting Guidelines include:
" 1. Maintain high standards in public and private building design
and landseape site design.
10. Protect and preserve natural water drainage, water recharge
areas, and water ponding areas."
We suggest that the language of the Addend�n refer to these existing goals
as well as stating new goals and standards to express the specific concerns
raised.
• � � � u � :�• •� i• • �r �:r : • � • .�• �� �• .
Introduction
The purpose of this Addendum to the Comprehensive Plan Por the Southeast
Ar� is to set forth the standards for the physical development of that
portion of the Mendota Neights Imown as the Southeast Area. This doct,unent
is intended as a companion to the original 1979 Comprehensive Plan.
The location of this area within the City is shown on the attached graphic,
Figure 1: South�st Area I�ocation. Its boundary is delineated on Figure 2,
South�.4t Area Boindary, and is described as follows:
"Beginning at the southeast oorner of the Corporate Limits of the City
of Mendota Hei�ts, then westerly along said Corporate Limits to the
centerline of the right-of-way of Interstate Highway 35E, then
northerly along said centerline to the centerline of Mendota Heights
Road, then easterly along said centerline to the centerline of Dodd
Road, then northerly along said centerline to the north line of the
south half of Sectior� 35, then easterly along said line continuing into
Section 36 to the center point of Section 36, then northerly along the
west line of the east half of Section 36 to the north line of Section
36, then easterly along said Section line to the centerline of Delaware
Avenue which is the eastern Corporate Limits of the City, then
southerly along said centerline to the point of origin of this
description, except those portions of the Haselberger Addition and the
Simek Rearrang�nent in Section 35 which fall within this description."
t� •
In addition to the Goals already included in the 1979 Canprehensive Plan
the following goals are adopted for the Southeast Area:
1. To p��ovide a diversity of hou.ging types Within the multifamily
reside�tial area.g of the South�st Area.
�
Southeast Area/ Compreheilsive Plan and Zoning Implementation u
Supporting Guideline:
1. Repetitive design of structures'shall be limited to 150 units in
a given developcnent or on contiguous properties.
2. To encourdge developmeilt which �rill be sensitive to the natural
beauty arid terrain oP the Southeast Area.
3. To �dg+e developmerit at an appropriate scale for the area.
Supporting Guideline:
1. Multiple family structures should be no more than 24 units per
building, except by Conditional Use Permit.
4. To enoour�age development �hich provides the opportunity for property
ownership by its residents, this being r�ecognized as benePicial to
the ��nity as a Whole. .
LAND QSE Pi,AN
The Land Use Plan for the Southeast Area is hereby amended according to the
pattern on the attached graphic, Figur�e 3, Sout,h�st Ar� Land Use Plan.
The land use desi�nations on this plan are as follows:
LB-PUD Limited Business
The Limited B�asiness area is intended primarily for office anc� similar
uses. The developments should emphasize well desi�ed structures;�;.on
adequate sites with quality landscaping and parking areas on-site�to
provide an overall attraetive setting. ,
Where natural site features are to be preserved as part of the
development, or when a mixed use development is proposed, this can best
be accommodated through the use of the PUD approach. �
.�.,
HR-PUD High Density Residential (8 units/acre)
The I�t-POD areas are intended for a variety of housing types, including
apartments, eondominit.�s, townhouses, other clustered multi-family
housing, duplexes, single family homes, and others.
The developments should work with the natural features of the land in
. the siting of the buildings and should emphasize quality desi� and
materials, a variety of densities, and a scale appropriate to the area
and surrounding land uses. These ideals can be achieved bes� by using
the PUD, Planned Unit Developcnent approach.
The overall density is guided for eights units/acre. The specifie
density and development standards will be outlined in the Zoning
Ordinance, under the R-3 District or the I�t-PUD District.
�
South�.st Ar�/ Co�aprehensive Plan and Zoning Impleme�tation 5
!�t-PiJD t�ledi� Den.sity Residential (4 i.mits/acre)
The I�-PUD areas are intended for a variety of housing types, including
apartments, condomini�s, townhouses, other clustered multi-family
housing, duplexes, single family homes, and others.
The developments should work with the natural features of the land in
the siting of the buildings and should emphasize quality design and
materials, a variety of densities, and a scale appropriate to the area
and surrounding land uses. These ideals can be achieved best by using
the PUD, Planned Unit Development approach.
The overall density is guided for four units/acre. The specific
density and development standards will be outlined in the Zoning
Ordinance, i.mder the R-2 District or the I�2-PUD District.
LR-II LoW Den.4ity Residential (2 units/acre)
The LR-II areas are intended for single family homes at a relatively
low density. This designation is between the existing LR Low Density
Residential and RR Rural Residential in intensity.
♦
The developments should work with the natural features of the land in
the placement of the lots and the homes should emphasize quality design
... and materials.
The overall density is guided for two i,mits/acre. The specific
density and development.standards will be o��tlined in the Zoning
Ordinance, under the new R-1C District.
�
�I�,,��►. �; � r, : „�� :.,«,n..,ia,rr.
R-3 I�u7-tiple Family Residential District
The Cot.mcil directed Staff to draft an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
that w�ould decrease the maxim� allowable density in the R-3 Zone to 8.0
units/acre. The language in the present Ordinance does not contain a
single simple number for the maximun density, but rather refers to a table
indicating the total lot area required per unit for each size of unit, and
also whether the building is a single story or more. In addition, there is
a lot area credit per unit given for each parking space provided underneath
the building.
Therefore, a given development would be allowed different densities
depending on the mix of one, two, and three bedroom units; on the height of
the struetures; and on the parking arrangements. The absolute theoretical
maximum density would be reached by a development of all one bedroom units
in three story buildings with a p�arking space underneath for each unit.
This comes to 11.5 units/acre. A project like this would never be proposed
realistically, and a more reasonable project containing two bedroom and one
bedroom units in an even mix, with parking i.glderneath, would yield a
density of 10.5 Lmits/acre. A project of all two bedroom units would
result in 9.6 i.ulits/acre.
Southe+ast Area/ Canprehe�n.give Plan and Zoning Imple+mentation ' 6
The nLcnbers used widely in our discussions have been an existing density of
10 units/acre, and reducing that to 8 i.mits/acre. We propbse adjusting the
rnunbers'in the table to achieve a reduction in the densities of 20� in all
cases. Under this method, the densities quoted above would be as follows:
Development
All 1 Bedroan, parking i�der
Mix, 1& 2 Bedroom, parking t.mder
All 2 Bedroom, Parking under
Old Nos.
11.5 u/a
10. 5 u/a
9.6 u/a
New Nos.
9.1 u/a
8.3 u/a
7.6 u/a�
In addition, the standards expressed in the Ccmprehensive Plan about ��.
variety of buildings and the scale of the development should be included in
. this ordinanee to set a minimun threshold beyond which the Council would
have diseretion in reviewing projects. This would be achieved by requiring
. a Conditional Use Permit Por projeets going beyond these standards.
It is important to note that the purpose for including language that
triggers a Conditional Use Permit is not to completely disallow certain
uses or to restrict them uznecessarily, but to make sure that when uses
exceed the minimuffi requirements they adhere to certain reasonable
conditions, hence the title Conditional Use Permit. This is different from
non-permitted uses, which would be expressly deleted fY�om any list of
acceptable uses in a district.
Sample Ordinance:
�
Section 1. Ordinance No. 401 Imown and referred to as the "Mendota
Neights Zoning Ordinance" is hereby amended as follows: _
Under Section 10.1 Permitted Uses, Section 10.1(1) is amended to read
as follows:
"Dwelling struetures containing two (2) units to twenty-four (24)
imits, provided no more than one h�mdred fifty units in a given�
development project or on contiguous property are in structures
which are identical or substantially si.milar architecturally."
Under Section 10.2 Conditional Uses, add the following paragraph:
"10.2(7) Dwelling structures of twenty-four (24) units or more.
Section 10.4(4) is-amended to read as follows:
•�r
"The following minimum lot area per dwelling unit requirements shall
be observed:
�:: . ._. ��
1 Story 6,310 sq. ft. 7,500 sq. ft.
2 Story 5,500 sq. ft. 6,530 sq. ft.
3 Story or more 5,100 sq. ft. 6,050 sq. ft.
C-• •• i
8,290 sq. ft.
7,210 sq. ft._,
6, 680 sq. ft;: ��
Southeast Area/ Canp�r�he�sive Plan and Zoning Imple�entation 7
R-2 Hedi� Density Residential Zoning District
The existing R-2 Zone allows a two family structure (duplex) on a 15,000
square foot lot. This comes to 7,500 square feet per unit, or 5.8
units/acre. This is higher than the 4 units/acre intended for the new MR
Medium Density Residential areas in the Southeast Area. By reducing the
density in this zone and adding other residential uses to the list of
permitted uses, this district can itimetion well as the Medii,un Density
Residential zone.
Sample Ordinance:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 401 lmown and referred to as the "Mendota
. Heights Zoning Ordinance" is hereby amended as follows:
The title of the Section will be amended to read as follows:
"SECTION 9. "R-2" t�DIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT"
Section 9.1 is amended to read as follows:
"Permitted Uses
,� Within the Medium Density Residential District, no structure or land
. shall be used except for the one (1) or more of the following
US@3.n
Section 9.1(2) is amended to read as follows:
"Dwelling structures containing two (2) t�its to twenty-four (2�)
LII'llt3. n
Section 9.2 is amP.nded to read as follows:
"Conditional Uses
Within any "R-2", Medium Density Residential District, no structure
or shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use
permit."
Section 9.4(1) is amended to read as follows:
"No structure or.building shall exceed two (2) stories or twenty-five
(25) feet whichever is the lesser in height except as provided in
Section 20."
�
Southea.st Area/ Caopr�hensive Plan and Zociing Implementation
Section 9.4(3) is amended to read as follows:
�;
"The following minim�mm requirements shall be observed subject to the
additional requireroents, exceptions and modifications as set forth
in this Section and Section 20.
Lot Area/ Lot
Dwelling Lot Area Unit Width
1 Family 15,000 sf 15,000 sf 100 ft
Front Side Rear
Yard Yard Yard
30 ft �o ft 30 ft�
2 Family 20,000 sf 10,000 sf 100 ft 30 ft 10 ft 30 ft*
3 Family 30,000 sf 10,000 sf 150 ft 30 ft 15 ft 30 ft
or larger
� Or 20� of average lot depth, whichever is greater
R-1C Zoning District
The R-1C District is intended to provide the opportunity for single
family development at a density betWeen the existing R-1 Zone (15,000
square foot lots) and the R-1B Zone (30,000 square foot lots).
The wording of this ordinanee will be almost identical to the existing
�� R-1B Distriet, except that the District will be called "R-1C One Family
Residential District", and the numbers in the last section will read as
follows:
- "The following minimum requir�ents shall be observed subject to the
,'' additional require�ents, exceptions, and modifications as set forth in
this Section and Seetion 20.
Hei t Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard
1 and 2 20,000 100 ft. 30 ft. 10 ft. 30 ft., or 20 � of
story sq. ft. average lot depth,
whichever is �eater"
Planned Units Development Zoning Districts
The new PUD Zoning Districts will follow elosely the provisions of
the existing Planned Un�t Development Ordinance, Section 19 of the Zoning
Ordinance. The major changes will be to the first two sections of thatx
Ordinance, outlining the purpose and general development standards.
Section 00.1 Purpose and DePinition, is changed to read as follows:
; "The purpose of the Planned Unit Development District is to encourage a
flexibility in the desi� and development of land in order to promote
its appropriate use; to facilitate adequate and econanical provisions
of streets and utilities; to preserve the natural and scenic qualities
for open areas; to encourage a diversity of housing types within a
�
soutn�st Ar�/ comprehensiv�e Plan ana zoning Implementation 9
given development and within the community as a whole; and to limit
development to a scale appropriate to the existing terrain and
surroi.mding land uses."
A new paragraph will be added after Section 00.1, to read as follows:
"00.1(1) The Planned Unit Uevelopment District will be comprised of
three types of zoning desi�ations, one of which will be applied for
for a given development project:
00.1(1)a HR-PUD High Density Residential Planned Unit Development
District: This District is intended to provide the opportimity to
develop a Planned Unit Development of a nature and intensity
generally equivalent to the R-3 Zoning District.
00.1(1)b I�-PUD Medium Density Residential Planned Unit
Development Distriet: This District is intended to provide the
opportunity to develop a Planned Unit Development of a nature and
intensity generally equivalent to the R-2 Zoning District.
00.1(1)c Office-PUD Office Planned Unit Development District: This
District is intended to provide the opportunity to develop a Planned
t3nit Development of a nature and intensity generally equivalent to
the B-1 Zoning District.
Section 00.2 Approval and Administration
(First five paragraphs identical to existing PUD Ordinance)
, Sixth paragraph, Section 00.2(2), is changed to read as follows:
' F
"In a Planned Unit Development District the rn.unber of dwelling units
proposed for the entire site shall not ex�ceed the total rn.mmber
permitted under the density control provisions of the equivalent
standard Zoning Distriet. The HR-PUD District will use the standards
of the R-3 Zoning Distriet as a guide; the I�t-PUD District will use the
standards of the R-2 District as a guide. If the Planned Unit
Development is in more than one (1) zoning district, the number of
allowable dwelling units must be calculated separately for each portion
of the Planned Unit Development that is in a separate zone, and must
then be combined to determine the number of dwelling units allowable in
the entire Planned Unit Development."
Under A roval and Administration Section 00.2(4)a will be changed to
read as ollows:
"It is the intent of this Ordinance that the review of a rezoning to a
Planned Unit Development District will be carried out substantially in
the same manner as the review of any other application under the
subdivision control ordinance. When such a rezoning is approved, the
Planned Unit Development shall be designated on the Official Zoning Map
of the City, and shall constitute the only zoning available to that
property, other than the existing underlying zoning, until it is
amended as provided for Lmder the provisions of this Ordinance."
�K
�
Southe+a.�t Area/ Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Implementation 10
There are other minor details of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance
which will have to be resear�ched to be certain that the wording is
consistent with the intent, but ba.sically the remainder of the new PUD
Ordinance will be similar to the existing Section 19 PUD Ordinance. Many
of these details involve changing the wording in the existing ordinance
which refers to a PUD as conditional use permit to wording expressing its
new status as a zoning district.
�
�
1411V
DArE: October 23, 1985
T4t "ta�ar, City Council and City A �r�ator
FRO`1: Paul R. Berg
Code Enforcement Officer
SUBJECT: Building Activity Report for October, 1985
CURRENT MdNTH YEAR TO DATE - 1985
N0. VALUATION FEE CdLLECTED N4. VALUATION
BLDG PER*1ITS �
sF� 4 474,829.77 3,1b1.41 56 6,585,478,59
�r a o o a Q
C/I 4 77,Q00.00 810.71 39 6,694,138.00
rtzsc. 15 204,536.58 2,108.76 117 59$,790.32
su$ TOTAL23 756,366.35 6,080.88 212 23,8$3,4Q6.9i
TRADE PER*tITS
Plbg �
Wtr �
Swr 8
Htg, AC,
Gas Pipe g
SUB TOTAL33
LICENSING
Contractor's
Licenses 3�
168.Q0 67
45.00 62
140.00 48
376.50 82
729.50 259
75o.oa � 318
0
FEE COLLECTED
44,029.68
Q
32,521.12
11,204.61
87,755.41
1,638.00
12,807.50
840.00
5,749.50
21,Q35.Q0
• i li
YEAR TO DATE - 1984
N0. VALUATION FEE COLLECT.=!
45 5,075,164.83 34,918.66
3 6,750,QOQ.00 28,749.60
4b 2,765,213.00 17,236.46
131 2,$69,065.27 20,402.09
225 17,459,443.10 201,306.82
91
72
62
108
333
4,290.00
360.00
1,16Q.OQ
1a,�6o.00
7,475.0�
TOTAL �6 $756,366.35 $7,560.38 789 $13,883,406.91 $116,740.�1 857 $17,459,443.10 $124,85i.81
NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee ar
vaivatian amounts.
0
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 23, 1985
T0: Ma or, City Council and City �n�.n�r'�tor
Y
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Easement Vacation - Brompton Courts Plat
DISCUSSION:
In 1976 when the Brompton Courts plat was approved the applicant plat-
ted a 20 foot wide utility easement diagonally across the middle of Lot 5,
Block 1. In researching City files it appears as if the easement was for
private use only (no City utilities are in it). Lot S does not have a home
on it, it is being used as yard space for the large home on Lot 4. The
owner of Lot 4 now desires to sell Lot 5 for a new home site and would like
to vacate the easement because it substantially limits the placement of a
new home on the lot. (See back for map)
RECOMMENDATION:
The utility easement is not needed by the City and staff recommends that
the easement be vacated.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Conduct a public hearing and based on input from the hearing decide
whether or not to vacate the easement across Lot 5, Block 1, Brompton .
Courts. If Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation to vacate
the easement they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 85- ,
RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT IN LOT 5, BLOCK 1,
BROMPTON COURTS.
�
� r.
1 ��
���. .
I
� '�;1 �
. r ' \ ��� `
� �� .: i � ` ti � �t � r: J
._ L ti i%' ..� 1 i�:� .�l ...
, �� J r 's �
�� �
, �i'} ��� L... 1
' s L�vF a� rvr f�cus E,asr �.
��sr
� _ �:'_ �z1a. �z�+�
�_ �
`1 �r"io`.00 �'. �e� oo ; 8,o � g t� h�,v, u� a� cor ,►, ,� u7 su
� � EXtSTtN6 EASE.-": o !
-�- �— - -�-� - -- - - - _. _ _ � _... f.. - - -� -�° � - - h"�!'�" - - . j�o` ry � _ _ , _ _ , � _. _
' � � v'� y � � �,
l t 5,794�! �� 3p � � t 8 3�
�i. ; ` O �"� '\W
�000 �. � 6 _
Ha 103� $ � � �
� �
? .1 0 �J
� ` tT-�etao-asa-a4 � � ��$ Q' ti
, (O� Qy �
25. i4 �.; b N�"2d',i ` y "`�
�....,,
~ �' , a'l f 54z "�..., � y
� \ `a \ �O Op ., 7c
1 J �JrV�
DO � 't, o ` , '� dx90°27'S2`
I � _��` � � 7 � : � Rr,� �
� 1 1�0 1 ISr426 g .
4� � I .Oa .� � � ` „(,Q.AQ ,"� S ,y w'"' O
'`"� o h r M
�� � � ` '"' � No. I 03 9 �N " o � `°�.
,� � ,� _� ` ` .� o
p h Q1 M kl N �t��� .1,
~ � � � h � N
�c ; y� ` ` +atoa-osa-o� q
Q \ �/�N�'.
. 6O Q� �
� V
i�, N e3�oe',� "w �� R:� � R��Gb
is
�� e. es '"�a=�,��,�e" 2
. � � � R=saaa � y
� � �� -�p'� 4 .
i :. A`� 9� � . e
•; � �� v..�a•,�► b�22��g�'Zt1�
� 4 � �r � `r+�,�a, s�2o3
� o �4 3o,sa3Q _,�p,� �, A
•�J �, � � �+
c7 o hi� � �Lr,��- 1
�:. � �� � �
� i� F! 0 1443' � W' � 1
' f Wo �' I
W 16200-040-01
' � ro ad
� , i
.�
; :k
.,�...
I
I� �
W�. _.� .
P20 �
. ... ft�l:�it ....
EAS� :
N. LIX£ Of S. ldd.00 FJ: .4f LOT f, �tUtt Stld. XO. .�--'"y
� 4T
�
Ho, 1034
�a:oo-a�o-
N 89°25!
/9f. 5
�
H p, I
�6200
22�560 �,
�
Ha.1��44
�.too-o�o-o�
i�
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION N0. 85-
RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT IN
LOT S, BLOCK l, BROMPTON COURTS
WHEREAS, Thomas P. Dolan is the current record owner of Lot 5, Block 1, of
the property included within the plat of Brompton Courts, Dakota County,
Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, a petition has been duly presented to the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights by Doherty, Rumble & Butler on behalf of Thomas P. Dolan
for the vacation of a 20 foot wide utility easement particularly described
as follows:
All of that portion of Lot S, Block 1, Brompton Courts, County of
Dakota, State of Minnesota being within two lines drawn parallel to and
ten feet from either side of a line described as follows: commencing
at the Southwest corner of Lot S, Block l, Brompton Courts; thence
South 83D 08M 14S East a distance of 60.01 feet along the southerly
boundary of said Lot S to the point of beginning of the line to be
described; thence North 16D 26M OOS West a distance of 113.49 feet,
more or less, to a point on the northerly boundary of said Lot 5 that
is 25.74 feet, more or less, from the Northwest corner of said Lot 5 as
measured along said northerly boundary, and there terminating.
WHEREAS, a notice of hearing on said vacation has been duly published and
posted more than two weeks before the date scheduled for the hearing on said
vacation, all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said vacation on November 5, 1985, at
8:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall of the City of Mendota Heights; and
WHEREAS, the City Council then proceeded to hear all persons interested in
said vacation and all persons were afforded an opportunity to present their
views and objections to the granting of said petition.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the vacation of the drainage easement described above, sit-
uated in the City of Mendota Heights, is in the best interest of the
public and the City, and is not detrimental to the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
2. That the above described utility easement be and the same is
hereby vacated. _
�•.
<-.
0
3. That the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized and directed to
prepare and present to the proper Dakota County officials a notice of
completion of these vacation proceedings, all in accordance with the
applicable Minnesota Statutes.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 5th day of
November, 1985
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 25, 1985
T0: Mayor, City Council and City�d�ir�t�'f�ator
FROM: Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer
SUBJECT: Health Resources, Inc.
INTRODUCTION
We have called a hearing for Health Resources for an IR bond issue to be held
at 7:45 P.M. on November Sth.
We have been advised that Health Resources would like for now to put the
hearing and issue on hold for the time being. After consulting with Tom Hart and the
Company, we feel the following procedure should be followed:
1. Call Hearing to Order.
2. Announce that issue approval is to be delayed.
3. Take public comment on issue.
4. Continue hearing to December 3rd, which would be about the last
possible date that action could be taken.
By this action, we could avoid a republication if the problems can be
resolved by that time.
0
LES:madlr
1.'. �.�jk ,
^s*,{-� �'` � � .
Qctober, 24, Z985
Mr. Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer
City of Mendota Heights "
750 South PZaza Drive
Mendota Meights, Minnesota 55120
Dear Mr. Shaughnessy:
On behalf af Health Resources, Inc., I want �a withdraw .its request for
approval of Indus�rial DeveZopment Bond financing. Pres�nt.Iy, NeaZih
Resources does not want to continue the appZicat.ior� process ar�d as
discusssed over the teZepharre, requests the project be announced "on hold►,
at the Navanber 5�h public hearing.
M.ike Putzier and I great.Iy appreciate the efforts yau and Tom Hart have
extended to date and look forward io future inieractions.
Sincerely,
i�
t_�tti..�..t.'-�-��►�.. � ��L
Carolyn Koch
Corporate Development Manager
CK: dr
�c: Tom Nart
.7ohn Reil.ir�g
Mike Putziex
����i) El:i'I_�{1V(}Uti t�t'{;llt!(', �'1.E()�Cit'<}t)C�, {�"Ilili7C:S(}i:! ���{)J
C>!2i 77t}-913;�
R ,.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. F s��� �
City Admi � �
SUBJECT: Public Works Radio System
October 28, 1985
Attached are memos and letters from Chief Dennis Delmont and our radio
consultant, John DuBois, recommending that we proceed to acquire the equipment
for the Public Works Department at a cost of $28,746.16. As you can see, this
is slightly below the amount that was originally anticipated in the project
budget.
Since installing the Public Works equipment will necessitate antennaes
on our water tower, DuBois is recommending that at the same time, we proceed
to install the Police and Fire antennaes for the repeater system. This will
cost an additional $965.68. West St. Paul City Manager Bill Craig has agreed
that it is reasonable to proceed with this part, and that we can obtain a credit
for this expenditure against our portion of the final bill for the joint police
and fire system.
Dennis will be present at the meeting and will answer questions.
ACTION REQUIRED
Motion to authorize radio consultant John DuBois to acquire public works
radio equipment and police/fire antennae from the ISD 191 bid, at a cost of
$29,711.84.
KDF:madlr
attachment �'
�
MEMO
O�tober 18, 1985
TQ: �ICevin Frazell, City Administrator
Tam Olund, Public Works Superintendent
FROM: Dennis J.Delmont, Chief of Polic�j���
StIBJECT: Public Works Radio System
Attached please find copies of the new FCC license for the Public Works
radio system, �he quota�ian for purchase and instalI.atian of the system,
and a].etter of recommendation from our radio consultant. His recommendations
include:
l. Buya.ng and installing the Police/Fire antennaes an the water
tower at the same time as �he Public Works antennaes. This
would save on the insCallatian costs,
2. ilsing a base statian in the Engineering office instead of
remotes. This would be more expensa.ve initially, but would
eliminate ghone line costs and soon pay for itself.
3. Upgrading antennaes far additional cast.
.:•<� The totai Public Works system cost comes to $2$,746.1b, with the additionai
$965.6$ for Police/Fire equipment, the total wauld be $29,711.84. Du$ois'
estimate for Public Works was $29,C?4Q.OQ.
Please note the last paragraph in Communica�ions Genter's letter Chat makes
reference to the need to move quickly.
I would recammend that we accept DuBois' recammendation and autharize him to
mave farward on the project.
DJD:cb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�C�7
Octaber 2$, 1985
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. Fra � �
Cit Admi 'strato�
Y
SU83ECT: Request for Council Agendas
Former Councilman Jim Losleben has requested that the City pravide the
opportunity for citizens to "subscribe" to the city agenda for a reasonabl.e
fee. He is speaking simpiy of the cover agenda page.
Based an my previous experience in Coon Rapids, Z would agree that this
is an excel].ent way far those who are truly interested in city affairs to stay
abreast of what will be before the Council, CYtarging a nominal fee discaurages
those who si.mply put their name down on a mailing 1.ist, then continue to receive
copies for years after they have atty true interest.
I would suggest an annual fee of $17.pQ. This would be approximately 50G
per agenda (wa.th special sessa.ons we easily run tha.rry meeta.ngs per year), plus
a$2.00 administrative charge for �he effort af biliing and receiving payment.
Si.nce I am assuming that Council would have no objection ta providing this
ogportunity for interested citizens, I am taking the liberty af placing this on
the Consent Calendar. Unless Council directs otherwise, we wi11 proceed to
implement it.
ACTION REQUIRED
Motian to authorize subscriptians to city caunca.l meeting agendas at an
annual fee of $17.�OQ.
iCDF: madlr
A
a
ll�•, •^ ri��.• \"..-1�.•• � ..��
�
` .' .. 1 . . � ..� ... ,
E'i�Ph f. .f n:�:�i'v hLr9,/�i�ss
IO qc
2uu �
� � f .
1
� ti/p/► E. e Coli A1. H���/roin .
/O A
�- — � — � — - �uia c. ,
, . � � � ��--------- ---- _.
/ �, /,� � Q
/ �. � i � .
/�•�• �' � '�
'•'/ ' \�
• • / �' / I .
� ' �� ' -• — � .
. . ���`
. I �C4
� �
�I . w �
r �
-. " �r
����n
�
_ �
�6+i.F
Sollr Robrna ef. al. n��,�� '
`
UGMZ'� — Ro/►o � �� � � �� � � �
-� � �� � � � �,�, � „� � �� �
\
Fi�i�rf ` L �cy Ow�-�r�
IO Arc.
,.,,..�
❑
:�■
�. , 3.i v�e. I icar . •--
'� �rSl�XYK�GX��iJC�i,X
�9 .��. � __. + s,t ,� ,.,,.., PLACE �
� I �� ^ ��+X�K}k71GM ,.,,,-c -----
'--- ----�,`_-----•------- � --- ' . � � �L�.i� ICENNEDX
,�� �j— — - — - — — - � _ `- ` � ' h�r3�X?�XYt��}�E, n���� - ..
- I � ` � , ' ' �'�` RAY KANE �,
� �-- .- _.__
, � ` `T.M. m.�.�nwy � ,.�,r� � -- .
_.._ . __ . ..._..__.
• • • �lt�� TORN DOWN
• . , .�.i�. �erri.�,, �e�a .
. �, �
5AN . TOWNSMIP ----- _ � ' -----•—•—.
� � .
T. 2�T Ny Q..�3 W. 4� M � r. •
-,
' 1 � ` �` �
�
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
''JI'�
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. ze 1
City Ad nist� r
October 29, 1985
SUBJECT: Suburban Rate Authority Request Regarding NSP Rate Increase
As Council will recall, earlier this year we received a letter from St.
Paul Councilman Bill Wilson, requesting our consideration to participate in a
multi-city effort to intervene in NSP's requested electric rate increase. At
that time, Council decided to inform Councilman Wilson that we were satisfied
, that our interests would be represented by the Public Utilities Commission and
the Suburban Rate Authority.
Attached is a letter from the Suburban Rate Authority, now asking our
consideration to contribute to their cause. As noted, the Rate Authority and
the City of St. Paul ha�e each contributed $20,000 to the effort. Apparently
the SRA is aski:ng non-member communities to consider a contribution of .05� per
capita toward the effort. Based on our latest population f igure of 8,060, this
';:t would be equivalent to $403.
The SRA has provided the attached prototype resolution.
ACTION REQUIRED
To determine whether Council wishes to f inancially support the SRA effort,
and if so, adopt the attached resolution.
KDF:madlr
attachments
MEMBERS
BIOOMINGTON
BROOKLYN CENTER
BROOKLYN PARK
BURNSVILLE
CHAMPUN
CIRCLE PINES
COlUM81A HEIGHTS
DEEPHAVEN
EDEN PRAIRIE
EDINA
exce�sioe
FRIDIEY
GREEN WOOD
HASTINGS
HOPK�NS
IAKE ST CROIX 6EACH
IAUDERDAIE
IORETTO
MAPLE PIAIN
MAPIEWOOD
MINNETONKA
MINNETRISTA
NEW BRIGHTON
NORTH ST. PAUI
ORONO
OSSEO
PLYMOUTH
RICHFIEID
ROBBINSDALE
ROSEVILLE
5T. ANTHONY
ST. LOUIS PARK
SHAKOPEE
SHOREVIEW
SHOREWOOD
SPRING PARK
VADNAIS HEIGHTS
VICTORIA
WAYZATA
WOODLAND
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
October 28, 19a5
Mayor Robert G. Lockwood
City of Mendota FIeights
750 So. Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Dear Mayor Lockwood:
�� � =, �, ;;_:,;
�� il ,�,;,`.�j
Tn 1975 and in 1976 several cities joined the Suburban
Rate Authority for the purpose of intervening in a
Northern States Power Company electric rate case before
the Public Utilities Commission. The purpose of that
effort was to assist the Commission in establisYiing
proper electric rates.
On August 1 of this year NSP filed a petition with the
Public Utilities Commission asking for an increase of
$129,000,000 per lear. The request of residential users
is an increase of over 15� in the electric rates.
The Suburban Rate Authority Board of Directors has
committed $20,000 to the joint effort, as has the City of
St. Paul. Several other cities served by NSP have
expressed an interest in supporting the case.
The SRA Board has asked me to correspand with the mayors
of those cities which participated in the first rate case
with the purpose of asking them to again participate.
In the first case, a contribution of 10 cents per capita
was requested. Because of the broader support in the
present case, I suggest that 5 cents per capita is
sufficient.
The broader our base of support is, the more effective we
can be. We hope you will consider supporting our effort
to keep electric rates as low as the circumstances
warrant. I enclose a draft resolution for your use. I
will be pleased to answer your questions. You May reach
me at (612) 425-1950. You may also direct your calls to
SRA counsel, Glenn Purdue at LeFevere, Lefler, Kennedy,
0'Brien & Drawz in Minneapolis, at (612} 333-0543.
Very truly yours,
�,�.V-�.Ji.�-�'�-
Graydon R. Boeck
Chairman
GEP/md
Enclosure
2000 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 •(612) 333-0543
RESOLUTION REQUESTING
THE SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
TO ACT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
( ) IN
ELECTRIC UTILITY R.ATE REGULATION
MATTERS AND AUTHORIZING THE
PAYMENT OF SERVICE CHAFGES THEREFOR
WHEREAS, the City of has determined
that it is in the public interest to cooperate with other munic-
ipalities in a joint effort to insure that municipal interests
and the interests of consumers of electricity be adequately and
effectively represented in the present NSP rate case which is
before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, and
WHEREAS, there now exists an organization of municipalities
in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, known as the Suburban Rate
Authority, which has had considerable experience in utility rate
regulation, and
WHEREAS, the Suburban Rate Authority is authorized under its
joint powers contract to conduct rate investigation and par-
ticipation in rate regulation matters on behalf of non-member
municipalities at their request and upon such reasonable con-
ditions, including payment of cost of service, as may be imposed
by its governing body:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council of the City of ,
Minnesota, hereby requests the Suburban Rate Authority to partic-
ipate in electric rate regulation proceedings before the Public
Utilities Commission relating to the public rate filing.
2. If such request is approved by the Suburban Rate
Authority, the City of agrees to contrib-
ute reasonable costs for such service to the Authority in an
amount of not less than $100 nor more than $10,000 based upon a
computation of $.05 per capita, said payment to be`made no later
than 60 days after approval of this request by the Authority.
3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a
certified copy of this resolution to the Chairman of the Suburban
Rate Authority.
�.�
r�.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. Fr z
City Admini rato
SUBJECT: Highway 13 Task Force
October 29, 1985
Attached is a letter from Lilydale Mayor Harvey Bream, requesting a Mendota
Heights representative to a Task Force to deal with Highway 13 concerns. Police
Chief Dennis Delmont will be working with the committee in a staff capacity and
Mayor Bream would like to have a member of our City Council to serve as a regular
member of the committee.
ACTION REQUIRED
Select a member of the City Council and authorize them to serve as the
Mendota Heights representative.
KDF:madlr
attachment
�'ift� �f �'iltJr���� (�n c�"`'�ie +c��ississi��i
855 5IBlEY MEMORIAL HIGFiWAY i liIYDA�E, MINNESOTA 55118 1 PNCtNE 454-4d01
October i'�� 1�8�
TO:
Mayor Lockwood
Mendata Fieights
FROM: Mayor Hreaan
Lilydale
SUBJECT: Desi.gn & Use of Highway 13
,+y t ^ '� /� .i? ! Y�" "
� ;r;��y,
The desi.gn and use of Highwa}r 13 is a matter of
concern to Lilydale residents and the City Council.
The problems rela�e to access and egress at
junctu�c^es with Victori.a and w3.th Highway 35� speed
limi.ts� and roadsa.de parking. The State of Minnesota
I�igh.way Dept. i.s generally norx-responsive to these
concerns.
Mendota Heights shares frantages on Highway 13
with Lilydale. Lilydale woul.d li.ke to see a
commission composed of a represen.tata.ve from
Mendata Heights, La.lydalei Mendata an.d the Palice
Dept. which searves the tharee cities� work with �he
State Highway Dept. to resolve the cancerns which
exa.st.
The purpose of this letter is to 501.2.C1t your support
for such a united effort, and to aslc �hat you appoint
a commi.ssion member far Mendota Heights.
I hope you will look favoarably on this request.
���
H ey B
1
�
am
TANDEM
James L. Ostenson
Richard A. Putnam
�ORPORATION
�KERS � PLANNERS � DEVELOPERS 6440 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 /(612) 941-]070
To:
Project:
By:
Date:
Si.ibject:
Meredota Heights City Coi.mcii
COPPERF7ELD formerly (Me�iota Farms)
Tandem Corporation and Lyman Lumber Company
October 30, 1985
Revised �te PIan for Phase I
Enciosed is a copy of our proposed revised site pian for CopperfieId. We have
made a coupie of changes which reflect the CounciTs recommendations.
1.
2.
One iot was removed from Block 4 as requested making the remaining
7 lots wider. '
The 4 lots in Block 5 have been increased in depth and oriented with
their rear yand south facing.
3. The park area was eniarged slightly along Huber to inciude the drainage
swa le • at the north end o f the pond. This required shi f ting our two
street intersections with Huber Drive northeast about 30-40 feet.
4. The scenic easement line along the lake has been staked on the site.
This iine wili be surveyed, if acceptable and included on the finai plat.
S. The streets north of Huber Drive have been changed by shifting the
cui-,de-sac north, thereby reducing the double frontage lots aiong Huher.
The revised pian retains the same 23 lots just in a siightly different
configuration. �
6. The "eyebrow" with three iots has been enlarged and a center island
added to better de fine the street and provide a pianting area.
7. The Ist Phase plat for CopperfieId is now 55 lots rather than 57 with
an outiot (Bi1G 6) to be plattecl as a future lot in Phase li. �
We are preparing covenants, scenic easement and architectural review standairIs
which will be provided to the city sta f f for review. We will be present at the
November Sth meeting to answer any questions you may have.
0
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTiS
MEMO
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. Fr 1� �
City A istrator ,
SUBJECT: Southeast Area Plan Amendments
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR SOUTHEAST
October 30, 1985
Attached is the memo from City Planner Ho ard Dahlgren, proposing specific
, language for the Comprehensive Land Use Plan a endments that were approved by
Council on October 15th. Council should deter ine whether Howard's recom�nendation
meets its intent, and if so, authorize him to repare the final amendments for
� subsequent adoption.
A memo from City Attorney Tom Har�t is att ched giving his opinion on the
legality of the City involving itself in the r ntal versus owner-occupied housing
question. Council directive on October lSth w s to include a statement of "strong
preference for owner-occupied housing." Becau e it is legally questionable
whether the City could, in fact, allow or disa low a development based on its
rental status, staff suggests the alternative ording of Goal 4 in Howard's memo.
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS
A document complimentary to the Comprehen ive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance will
also need to be amended to incorporate.the new PUD zoning districts, and reduce
the allowable density in R-3 districts. Aowar 's memo also proposes specific
language changes to accomplish that.
Also attached is Section 5.8 of the Zonin Ordinance'which stipulates the
procedures for its own amendment. A 4/5's Cou cil vote is required, and although
the Council can, itself, initiate an amendment it apparently must be referred to
the Planning Co�ission for a public hearing. Council should refer any desired
amendments to the Commission for public hearin at their November 26th meeting.
COMMERCIAL AREA AT DODD/MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD
As Council is aware, Tandem Corporation has
at the SE corner of Dodd/Mendota Heights Road. T
not suitable for any kind of residential developm
a neighborhood commercial district. In the rathe
over the apartments, rezoning, bond issue, etc.,
this issue in any depth, except to express some g
there is really a neighborhood commercial market
development.
�urchased �the f inger pro j ect ion
iey have argued that the land is
ant, and should be considered for
� long and laborious discussions
�ouncil has never really addressed
:neral skepticism as to whether
yet available to support the
0
Ideally, the.developers would�of course, like to see this area designated as
a planned unit development commercial district in the adoptions to the Southeast
area Comprehensive Land Use plan changes. I have indicated to them that I do
not feel that a majority of the Council is prepared to take that step at this
point. However, I have said that it is my feeling that Council has not precluded
the idea of commercial development at that area at some future date. Tandem would
like the opportunity to begin a survey and discussions with residents in this
area of the City, to determine just whether there is a market for neighborhood
commercial, and what kinds of amenities people would like to see. They are rightly
concerned that if the Council simply adopts the Southeast Area plan with this shown
as high density residential, the neighbors will think the issue has been closed
forever, and will not be open to any further discussions. As a compromise, I have
suggested that perhaps Council leave the area designated high density residential
in the Comprehensive Land Use plan, but in so doing, make it very clear in the
public record that it does not consider the issue closed, and that it endorses the
efforts of Tandem to enter into neighborhood discussions.
Alternative ways for Council to deal with this issue include the following:
1. In directing the City Planner for final plan adoption, direct that a
PUD commercial district be included in this area as an alternative.
2. Adopt the Southeast Area Plan as suggested in the City Planner's memo,
but make it explicitly clear that the Council does not consider the
issue of commercial developmenz at this corner a closed topic.
3. Simply adopt the plan as proposed in the Planner's memo, not addressing
the commercial issue.
,,.,. .
ACTION REQUIRED
To consider the proposed language changes in the City Planner's report and
direct staff on final wording for adoption. This action should include a directive
and statement on the commercial designation at Dodd/Mendota Heights Road. A1"`so,
refer the zoning ordinance amendments to the Planning Commission for public hearing.
KDF:madlr
.. ' S.8 Amendments
5.8(1) The City Council may, by an aff irmative vote of four-
k•�� fifths (4/5) of all members thereof, adopt amendments to
the Zoning Ordinance.
5.8(2) Initiation of Amendment - Proceedings for amendment of this
Ordinance shall be initiated by either a petition of the
� owner or owners of property within a zoning district, by a
recommendation of the Planning Commission, or by action of
the City Council. -
5.8(3) Application - All applications for amendment which are
initiated by the owner or owners of property shall be
filed in the office of the City Clerk and shall state the
exceptional conditions claimed as a basis for the amendment.
5.8(4) Referral to Planning Commission - The City Clerk shall
refer all applications for amendment to the Planning
Commission. Upon receipt of the application and application
fee, the City Clerk shall establish a date for a public
, hearing by the Planning Commission and shall be responsible
for the publication of hearing notices.
5.8(5) Planning Commission Notice and Hearing on Application for
C Amendment - The Planning Commission shall hold a public
hearing affording an opportunity for all parties interested
to be heard and shall give not less than ten (10) days nor
more than thirty (30) days notice of the time and place of
such hearing published in the designated legal newspaper for
the City. Within sixty (60) days after the date of refer-
ence by the Council, the Planning Commission shall make a
. written report to the Council stating its findings and
' recommendations.
5.8(6) The Council shall hold a public hearing within thirty (30)
days after the receipt of the report and recommendations
from the Planning Commission. If the Planning Commission
- fails to make a report to the Council within sixty (60)
days af ter the referral of the application, then the
Council shall hold a public hearing within thirty (30)
days after the expiration of said sixty (60) day period.
Failure to receive a report from the Planning Commission
as herein provided shall not invalidate the proceedings or
action of the Council. The Council shall give not less
than ten (10) days nor more than thirty (30) days notice
of time and place of such hearing published in the desig-
nated legal newspaper for the City. At the time of
hearing, the Council may take final action upon the
C application or it may continue the hearing from time to
time for further investigation and hearing. The Council
may also,.request further information and report from the
Planning Commission.
-:::
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 30, 1985
T0: Mayor, City Council and City Ad i�-�t�ator
FROM: Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer
SUBJECT: Equipment Certificates
INTRODUCTION:
At our October lst meeting, the Council authorized receipt of proposals for
the purchase of $260,000 Equipment Certificates at the November 5th meeting.
Offers are to be received until 4:30 P.M., on Tuesday, and a tabulation will
be available for the Council meeting.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Adopt Resolution No. 85-
lowest bidder.
LES:madlr
attachment
�
, awarding sale of Equipment Certificates to the
CITY OF_MENDOTA HEIGHTS
P�EMO
October 30, 1985
T0: Mayor, City Council and City Admj�nis�rator
• ��
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Sanitary Sewers and Water Service Connections
Andersen/Curley Properties
Job No. 8426
Improvement No. 85, Project No. 1
DISCUSSION:
The Andersen/Curley improvement project which was constructed this
summer is now completed.
RECO��IMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Council accept the project and approve
the final payment.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, a motion should be
passed to adopt Resolution No. 85- , RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND
APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR ANDERSEN/CURLEY SANITARY SEWERS AND WATER
SERVICES (IMPROVEMENT N0. 85, PROJECT N0. 1)
City oE MendoCa lieights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RCSOLUTTUN N0. 85-
RCSOLUTION ACCFPTTNG WORK AND AI'PROVING
FT.NAL f'AYMF..NT FOR ANDERSEN/CURLLY SANITARY SEWI;RS ANll WATER SERVICES
(IMPROVFMENT N0. 85, PROJ LCT N0. 1)
WHERL'AS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the CiCy of Mendota
Hei.ghts on July 17, 1985, Orfei & Sons, Inc. of SL-. Paul, Minnesota, has
satisfactorily completed the constr.ucti.on o£ Sanitary Sewers and Water
Ser.vices (Andersen/Curley Properties) in accordance with such contract.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights that the work completed under said contract is hereby ac-
cepted and approved; and -
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor. and City Clerk are hereby directed to
issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract in the amount of
$1,240.00, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this Sth day of
November, 1985.
ATTEST :
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
1
h'Mv
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 30, 1985
T0: Mayor, City Council and City �fl4�i�rif�ator
✓
FROM: Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer
SUBJECT: MPCA Noise Regulations
Attached for your information is the hearing notice (November 19th) and a
set of the proposed rules for the new MPCA noise regulations.
Of particular interest is Section 7010.0030, which would indicate City
liability for allowing new construction in an impacted noise zone.
In effect, the change from L10 to LEQ makes the new regulations considerably
more restrictive than current regulations and sets up a situation that will be
impossible to meet before the year 2000. MPCA passes this off by reference, but
no statement, to the effect that an LdN description will apply to aircraft noise.
John Shardlow is reviewing these regulations, and the Council should indicate
the extent of any City response to the regulations at the proposed hearing.
�
LES:madlr
attachment
,
STATE OF MINNESOTA
POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
Pro�osed Amendments to Minn. Rules
Parts 7010.0100 - 7010.0700, State NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL
Noise Standards OF PROPOSED RULE AMENDMENTS
Notice is hereby given that the rule amendments proposed by
the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ("Agency") and published
in the State Register (9 S.R. 2058, March 18, 1985) ("March 18
draft rule amendments") are hereby withdrawn�.
The Agency received more than 25 requests for hearing on the
March 18 draft rule amendments. On September 24, 1985, the
Agency adopted a resolution withdrawing those proposed rule
amendments and at the same time authorizing the Executive
Director of the Agency to commence a rule hearing on a different
set of proposed amendments to the State Noise Standards. The new
set of amendments is a modified version of the March 18 draft
rule amendments. Zn modifying the March 18 draft rule
amendments, the Agency has taken into account comments received
by the Agency during the comment period on the March 18 draft
rule amendments.
A copy of the Notice of Hearing on the newly proposed rule
amendments is enclosed, along with a copy of the rule amendments
��� as proposed.
.
HOMAS J. KALI OWSKI
� Executive Director
'"�" Date: October 7, 1985
s.�.
x
;:.
INFORMATIONAL ONLY
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 30, 1985
T0: Mayor, City Council and City Ad ' s�t�
FROM: Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer
SUBJECT: Sewer Rates
The first billing of the adjusted sewer rates have now been collected and
the actual average rate works out to within $1.00 of that estimated at the time
rates were set. ($29.50 actual, average $28.50).
We have received a total of less than 10 actual complaints to the new rates
and most callers noted that they had been prepared for the new rates through the
news stories in the local papers and the City Newsletter.
Work continues on reducing inflow. However, any benefit would not be noticed
prior to our 1988 billing.
ACTION REQUIRED:
'' None, this is informational only.
,
;�
LES:madrl
,�
.,� �_, .,�
e .
�: � • . w • . . ,
�
0
CITY OF MENDO TA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
COMPUT$R SOFTWARE AND EQUIPMENT
October 30, 1985
CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION ....................................
A. Purpose of Request for Proposal .............
B. Summary of Requirements .....................
C. Schedule of Events ..........................
II. BACRGROUND INFORMATION .........................
A. Staff and Organization ......................
B. Major Data Processing Systems ...............
III. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ..........................
A. Submission of Proposals .....................
B. Contractual Conditions ......................
C. Proposal Format .............................
D. Proposal Evaluation .........................
PAGE
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
5
5
6
8
9
IV. APPLICATION SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS .............. 11
A. Fund Accounting System ...................... 11
B. Accounts Payable ............................ 12
C. Payroll ..................................... 13
D. Utility Billing ............................. 14
E. Police Management ........................... 15
V. SYSTEM SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS .................... 17
A. Multi-user Operating System ................. 17
B. End-user Software ........................... 18
VI. COMPUTER EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS ................- 23
A. Central Processing Unit ..................... 23
B. Software and Data Storage ................... 23
C. Workstations ................................ 24
D. Printers .................................... 25
VII.
�=
ATTACHMENTS
A. Application Software Description
B. System Software Description
C. Computer Equipment Description
D. Training Description
E. Cost Summary
� �- �_ � ..
�' �
, '
� . ST� P, � t�v .
___ _... ____----- �>=-�-�s�. 4a �, �. �.___s_�.
838.�
— _, .__ ----._.__._... __�._ �• �5���'_�. S?N�
., �
o � ��
N a � 44� Sv �V.
� PP�
__ 4 ! �P%.�-� �.,.: r.,G. .
--° � � `
� �� �
=o ,t:
---------____. . . __.. _ ___ cj i .____ . .:
- : - --- ��- -- --
` :.- � ���
� h�� uJ�r= T P.
�3 � _ • � ln! Ur! • r: � � �i
� � I NC.� rL2 �
.�: Lv�i��; c.�:N-�-��: vN �� i�;i�; -�',E:� �nK• . - .. . : 1 �►�'. :' ..
� � � � � � I 1 I =` ( � � . A�� �EP � �
� . � ! ' ' �� � ,
� � F-�c' �:,R � -r ! � ' • � 1 i � - - .� _
� • ; ~A� �,J�, Cr.. k � � � � . ' � � ( � � r ,��. :
� _— . _. � y - -- -- - — � _
' ...-r' t '-' - ' " '- ' .
....... � _ '! k�. �,�� �.__-~. __. 1:...,^%' `�. : ,' h. � r . - ��! ` ',
� • 2 - 5 ; - { �; } SZ i.
: � 1
� • D • �'p � � �, f f D � -`� ,,� ` � � c �-.�.�„� —
� � � ; � �,
_.___oVER�wt�t SGu��ERS � ' ---. --: ----- --- , __,__ __...____
3 t I
, ,
� � � �
+ j ; , � � ..
. __ _.._ .__ _ _-- -- - - ,__.�.____ _ , _._ ;...____ .-- - - - ,
�� i , ' r
� c.c,N �- 'i I � � REn,- .. )
p • JG,��T a,a , � I �t11, ��D
����� C1j,.J��` 'r • 1 � n�, •5�.
� ��
� ' �`}`- = ( =1 t�;i � �F}} F►..C�P, Et..E'Y � . i ` �'' _ ___.__� ._
t c�. ao d�i AP�.�-1'�, I t�F,�v�, �5. � -� ��
I
1 i '1�- ` 3 .
� �G M•
� t'CJ i.-6.r`-if'�;IC.i�K�
_ �
_ �� ' - , .
r. �� �
7. � -�, r.._._ , �
iJ � ; �\�.
�,`t�(�Vt�.��� - 5EE � ��
Fi.C�P� f't,.1-1t�1 ' -�.
_ �,,,�' _ _ ' P. � i`_"
r, ., � ___._._ _._.
� � � ' __. ,..
, � � _
•J �� I � '
� � l��i �'J`.�.
. __� _ + . .� �__. __ ... ... �VAL.1�`>
,
i� �,�,/ ` ___. ..
' � U �?�,� h�. • : --� ----- �±
i i 1- . - •
!! �
. ��; � �� �
�,
_�__ _-- - -- --- -- ----__�_._ ._ _ . _ .-- • - - --._ _..______._._.. _ ._._,._„_. • -
. ?
j ��
� ��
; ; ' I . . �or Kr�c�a r�ao k_ � •
a
� : ' . . --� P �.1 . _._______ ;�
� �
a �
,
a— ' �--• -- - rx.oT �c�on Ao,�o , _—_.—.,. �ss.0 �'.a�r��, - --- - - ----�.�w��c r +� �-�r,.---�. __ .,_._ _----� - -
--_ __= � - _ ____ . _ . _ : .,,,r ,� . � r �,._. _ � _ �.___ � � �
,___ �__ . .. _ .__ ---
-f�--�--- ' . : �.,. -,• _r..ri.�.�R
� �� � ^ �� �R' o�.=,ssAcde, ' I ^ '`i-.�� k
� �i �_._. n------� _ �. ...._- --- - ' — y f
�i � 9USf�E$S PUZATx � � !,'.'k„^"'„�,. �J. �� " � T Miwrt�+ouS �,� . ,�e' u �o v _ ^ ��,? _ � 1 'iil�2�
¢ � � _ j ; tt � rr .a. .. -, -o - 14��';1
i � � RABST bEAT$ PROPEATY � • j � _ � `�ei%_•,r-- , - e ` � '��zj�
j � ( ( _.!o srm s.ir�+,{'..' . _.�.__._ __ T ' d � ��•'i
i �, 4 �; � ��' '� 1 } > �_. r _ p � ----s,.;.. r:-�-� ' � '`. � a�-
,, � '�� �i�fll���� �Ilfl! il !! ( I 1 l �,.lat
; i ! � a• � . � , � � ' ; a ,�
�, i / ;:at!i; = 1 u . p i � n_�.,_,.s �6����u ' _ -.-- `� � ,; o� `s /
�.c r. ..S n'F.JT� aw� .ra' � a7�7y4"t +i ti r` i�w. �.wlr,n ::nf t4• .
Cr. t . .o��� � _ � "I � � � ��t � E �.� ....,0�8� j �y,:i.'�: s '�
�! � � . � � .:, :�,
Q! �i ♦ - - - - "' '^ - - �. ' a! �,.,� . ' - � �
'- '. ; s.tiT. a�°"' u''°iws,7 • , S
� ,- �.t �. � � nxn.. 'at , : � •! � �_.
; � — E � 4' �1� . ��' ^��'k..l
jj -�� �-- i '_ ,o � , 'f' ,�.
=C I'M.j ti ..a'T � .. r � _ S _ . �1
r � �11 i � � � _ � R�O1 wf� � .Q_. ��� • i . . 1 � �
� _ � • •' . �� _QI � `_ � � _ �l a
� � I •
t - Si �_ �- '`° � ..�._. ..�. r� � _f'�P,K{Nf., GALCe.lLATK7N . �[i1
5� y 'f" }� cnr+w euw^q rw rf r�x �o ri a�
! ,� ^` �4�q� + a,,,� {f9�
'r-� � � f �T a
�� I �_ _ ' cwl�cs a.s C'k1
#`�, �'� -' µ 1 ei � .w,+anc r�e n,we RS �
�� �' _ o wo a � } ai _w d �o �,y,t+�u. ��wo .. uw.� ws • F
� 'r?°e.�' W' . . :. '_ � . ___._ -�-i -- � 'a '- - c+K�cc n+c� _ m rax `' p a
..n. � � • L... �. (', T s�. =» - ..��.�,,. fi,� .,� �.o �[ �
� � �« �«Y '� �s` � I f�"! ` !�� � FS�_S!ra6 r�Da� �+(
� .' e � � � c.,Y a.o � m+. �w�. �o` � .;iid � � ��is ip.� -�a « ��+ z a �
��1^ro.� � �fiM! �+'� ... r., t�»� � »• u.e � � ��I .
1,cp..� wv�w�+r. .•o+vrs �
�' «rµu.� r.0 � �. � �d: <�
' �' ' V+�s d . . � wn.rx�• .�� �n.7o5 ` S
^e,ti`TT u.e� , i-r. v.uti .�..2._.. .
G►-G�j"�. v7Y�1n: �
�. �stT.......ctio�A �.r•..� nnt'rc+. �
c a.-M�D...�i.�i �
f. 1r► (n J .. �/+.X. w9►GM7 +4 ?'+ri �.�4U-
.. ..'Vs;.�YOiW'A� b-�'���0� •G.
`G+'+ ��
��
i + �_ y�
i
� � o. ._._._.�,.�._ _.��_.r_ R �._.._.._..�_._�.�..__��_.._. _ _. �_. ._�. ,_ .�_. ..' -` " " " �
I ��� �
DAKOTA BUStNE�S PLAZA . � �'
MENDtJTA MEiGHTS � MINNES(?TA ' �j
_ �._._..__ ___ _, _. _ __ . __ . . .___._ ._. _.,------. , __... . ' } t11 �
il
�
� ---------•.r__._.��� �b o" _.._�.._.__._.____ _ .
�
� �+' l4-4
! •
� �
1 � -� -- �z' ---- --� � .,
DAKC�TA.:.
, � . ' r"
BUSI�V�S���.��4P.�
� _ _,.,a .. ; - ~'� �:;,,� �t4.01 PtLOT KNOB RQA�
;
�
0
0
�r+�r.-- Co�.9�tZo`( t�.. �oc,c
'T"a w� A-' c. � i � v��- O � � C-
_� � i { 4.'. � ; C o t_ o C<.5 -
�
� sFF' 3�,�c��..� ?�,..,..s �
�R. 3���
° M�-r�►,L -+-e? ^_.�P ���..rR� -
.' � �
' � i�L..�AST�C„ i-,Ac.t - �►a'-e¢.uq� ��.�
' S+GN CA3�w�' SF ,' �'Lv�.S �
�'1 C 0` y,'t S � � Ac
r � �•
,
f
f1 r ��
�oc�.-�f Pt.� 3..,�.n�..� p►.....�
St�N' f*2F�a SC�.-Fz, - 3Z FTI'
�Lt'rc.^Q�t-� 3.Z r�"�:3 � iZov �Qy c'r�
J �
v '�
i �
� ' _ 30
'� ' ' . "• , � Case,No: ,-..�.5 -�f ,
CITY OF iiENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
QF
PLANNZNG REQITEST
' ' DaCe of App].ication 14%3I%8S
Fee Paid $335.00
Applicant
Name : NORTEiLAND Lf�ND Cp�'tPANY
Last , First Initial � �
Address:__�o United Properties 3500 W$Oth St , Minneapo�j,,�, MN 554�1
Number & Street City State Zip
Teleghone Number: {b12) 8�3-8$36
Owner
• Name: Same as Applicant
Last First Initial
Address:
Number & Street City 5tate Zi.p
Street Location of Property in Questian:
SE carner of Pilot Knob Road & Northland Drive
Legal Descrzption of Property:
_ Lats l., 2 and 3, Block 6, Mendota Heights Tndustrial Park
Type of Request: Rezoning
Variance .
Conditional Use Permit
, Conditianal Use Permit far P.i1,D.
:�tinor Conditional Use Permit
X Subdivision Approval
Plan Approval
Wetlands Permit
OCher
�
m
CITY OF MFNDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 31, 1985
� l
T0: Mayor, City Council and City Ad�in�traLor
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJ�CT: Dodd Road Trunk Watermain Assessm�nts
Job No. 8317B
Improvement No. 83, Project No. 7B
DISCUSSION:
At the October 15, 1985 meeting, the City Council approved an assess-
ment roll for the Dodd Road trunk watermain assessments. All but two of
those assessed requested and were granted deferments. One of the two who
did not request a deferment, Ellen Gott, has now sold her property to the
Visitation Monastery. The Monastery has sent the attached letter requesting
a def erment f or that parcel also.
RECOMMENDATION:
• Staff recommends the Visitation Monastery request be granted.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation they should
pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 85- , RESOLUTION DEFERRING PAYMENT
OF ASSESSMENTS (IMPROVEMENT N0. 83, PROJECT N0. 7B)
VISITATION MONASTERY
24?5 Dodd Raad
ST. PAUL, MINNGSOTA SS120
Oct. 29, 1985
James E. Danielson, P.E.
Pub2ic Works Director
Ci�y of Mendota Heights
750 South Plaza
Mendota Heights, Mn. 55120
Dear Mr. D�nielson:
Since our letter of September 9, 1985, regarding assessment
for water haokap ta mains in the area af Aighway I�+9 and
Mendota Heights Road, we have acquired the pa:operty af
E12en C. Gott adjacent to whaC was cavered in our leCter.
This additional property is described as foZlows:
That part of the South 20 rads af the North 32 rods
of the NE ij4 of the SE 2J4 af Section 35, Township
28, Range 23, lying West of the Jefferson Highway
{StaCe Trunk Highway No. I49}, except the North b
feet thereof.
Wi1.l you kindly acN this to our assessment for whi.ch we wish
to have a deferment considered?
vIT
�
Sincerelys
�
m
VISZTATI4N MONASTERY
.�i S ��,� �(a. ,- U-Q � �:r � 1%� �Ia u ,�, .e V h`�t
� President 1
r'
i
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 31, 1985
T0: Mayor, City Council and City A '��
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Eide Lot for City Right-Of-Way
HISTORY•
In 1981 when staff completed a feasibility report for the Perkegwin
Lakeridge Development, it was recommended that a lot on the end of Swan
Court in the Eide Subdivision be acquired. Street and utility connections
wbuld then be made at that point to provide a second street access to the
new subdivision. The Lakeridge development did not go ahead and the lot was
not acquired.
There has been no pressure from either the Perkegwin land or the Eide
land to f orce any further thought on the matter since that time.
DISCUSSION•
Councilmember Blesener recently called to report that lot prices in the
Eide subdivision had been reduced so that lots should now begin to sell and
develop faster. She suggested that we review the situation and make a
decision on whether or not the City need to purchase that lot bef ore it is
too late.
I spoke with Howard Dahlgren about the street connection question. He
feels that a street configuration could be made such that the entire
Perkegwin development would exit on Dodd Road. He feels that the Eide lot
need not be acquired for street purposes. (see map)
Next we reviewed the utility requirements and found that although
sanitary sewer and watermain would best be designed connecting at Swan Court
A in the Eide Subdivsion, they too could all be connected at Dodd Road only.
Storm sewer for the west portion of the Lakeridge site was planned to
extend south and connect at Swan Court to avoid dumping storm water into
Rogers Lake. A outlet into Rogers Lake could be accomplished.
ALTERNATIVES• . -
1. Acquire the lot. THis would be difficult because the owner, Mr.
Eide, is opposed to such a connecting point and initially indi-
cated that he would not sell to the City. We would have to go
through condemnation, a lengthy expensive process.
2. Acquire utility easements through the lot for storm sewer and
watermain connections. This might also be an expensive alternate
if the Eides are unwilling to cooperate.
3. Do nothing. Serve the Perkegwin site entirely from Dodd Road.
RECONINIENDATION:
Staff recommends that Alternative 2 be followed. Contact could be made
with the Eides to determine if they are willing to sign an easement. If
they do not cooperate and dollars need to be spent a funding source need to
be established. (Developer or General Fund)
ACTION REQUIRED:
Review alternatives and give staff direction.
�
0
'l 6b
ON 'H '1'S
------�- ---r--_-- _ -
1N� � I � � �
I J � �S� � ` M ` �
� � � � �7s�o�o�d I M ----
, k }� J /�f� N ,,
. s -�
N ' _' �
� ' . � N I � _ �-----",
3NV1 3�IlV .,
� N � ,n
� � � M
M �-_�_
1 �
� � � N i
� N N h In r---
N i
. �
N �
Q lb � � �
N � � m
S6 N � ---
d —'
I � N ''�b �, �
. W `^�
���' __�� h N 6L+ N � �
f �----- _ �� ' N � OF�'�
� ✓'SN �i � c� Y — aD � _
--� 4 r I -
� �� � -- a _
� —,
�w � N � :
� �� i � M I
� � � °' P ; '
�
V 'wf:y.j iA
�j.--' -d�n '
� •''r�' � ��'��, NVMS
� ` _� J
0 W � v+
� C - 3 ,—.�-
�
� r � �---
� O� � tD � � N
w ; �
�� , ;
: � t�w � �� � ° � - � � �
� v, �`°� 3 � - ' ----'__ ,,
� ,��` u.! o .
� �
i � a
i - � 3
I � i
� ; , :
� � � b i � �_
; �.� � � �
� � � ,
i � O � , �. �-- __ _� `
i � r / \\ • �
i � � � �� , I
i/ � � /�' I
I / � ��
I / • ' ' � 1 I
y � _ � - ----� .
.si -- �_. --s��ob-- 1
,
= ' � ►
� �. � � �\ .
CITY OC' MENDOTA HEIGHTS Pl�s518t� Ac�.GESs POIrfTS Tv
750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights. Minnesota PERKE�WIN SITE to/3o/e5
'Y
l.eague of
Mina�esora Cities
y�,• ��/^ ��1�11"11��,IJqlu; 1, 1i '?'� • i �e "'e�:�
`,:,7►,1�•..:��� � •
.. _. :, . .. ..
�. �
Inc m n �'inancin ro'ect
Tax re e t P
J
October 31, 1985
Mr. Lawrence Shaughnessy
Treasurer
750 S. Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Dear Mr. Shaughnessy:
Earlier this month we informed cities that the League of Minnesota Cities and the
Minnesota Chapter of the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials
(NAHRO) had joined together to support tax increment financing.
A program of analysis and representational activities was developed. This step was
taken in response to resolutions adopted by city officials who studied the possibilities
of legislative action by the legislature in 1986 and beyond. The Boards of Directors of
both the League and NAHRO reviewed the proposal and unanimously endorsed the program.
The League/NAHRO committee retained the law firm of Holmes and Graven as a consultant.
Pursuant to this program cities have already received a questionnaire on tax increment
finance usage which will provide data for a comprehensive study.
City officials will recall that the League/NAIiRO program is to be financed by voluntary
contributions from cities involved in tax increment finance. These contributions will
defray the direct costs of employing Holmes and Graven while the League would provide
staff and other services to the effort on behalf of the cities who will benefit from the
overall activity, but are not currently engaged in the use of tax increment finance.
This letter officially requests your financial contribution in accordance with the
enclosed invoice. Several alternatives were considered before establishing the
assessment formula. All cities which had tax increment districts in 1984 payable 1985
tax year are being asked to proportionally contribute to the cost of the program.
The two factors used are the total assessed value in tax increment districCs and the
total assessed value of your city. Both of these factors have been adjusted by sales
ratio. Statewide totals for all cities_using tax increment were established along with
each city's percent of that total. Half the cost of the project is assessed based on
each city's proportionate share of the total assessed value of the cities involved. The
factors used and the resulting assessments are noted in the attached list.
T�e sincer.ely hope that your city will comply with its voluntary assessment to„help
preserve tax increment as a viable development tool financing in the future.,,
Sincerely,
`�i� ��
Susan Edel
I.MC President
Sincerely,
��`�tif// � � /' l "�f.�'
7
Nancy Re ves
NAHRO President
rti
- 1'
' � i
TIF TIF ARV ARV Total
Code City Ftrtor Assess�ent Factor Asseszaent Assess�ent
t
�� c��ty
12 AN01(A 0. Z0887c 111. 71 0. 5707�c 305. 35 � 417. 06
1� B1AIItE (JTl 0.2843X 152.08 1.1173X 597.76 � 749.84
17 C�.I�IA IfI6HTS 1.5096x 807.61 0.6446� 3M.64 � 1,152.46
18 C�1 RAPIDS 0.2449x 131.00 1.380P7c 738.40 ; 869.40
20 FRIDLEY 0.9211x 192.77 1.48727� 795.64 ; 1,2A8.41
21 HAM LA!(E 0.06177c 33.02 0.261BX 140.OB ; 173.11
E6 SPRIt� LK PK (JT) 0.15397� 82.3Z 0.2105t 112.60 � 194.93
Grver Coimty
52 (�iRSSE�I (JT) 1.70477c 912.04 0.3583x 191.69 S 1,103.73
53 CFiRSf(A 0.0560t 29.96 0.3458x 185.02 � Ei4.98
60 WACONIA 0.3019x 161.5Z O.lO50z 56.15 � 217.67
61 {�RTERTOrt�l 0. 06727c 35. 97 0. Q'S527c 29.5� � 65. Sl
Dakota Co�mty
B3 APPI.E VALLEY O.1B527� 99.07 1.00i6x 535.64 � 634.90
8� BIIRNSVILI.E 0. 04577c 24. 47 P. 3164x 1, ?39. P9 � 1, 263. 76
87 FARHIN6TOP! 0.1791x 95.84 0.166�ix 99.01 � 1B4.B6
89 HRSTII�S (dTl 0.26627c 142.41 0.46497c Z48.73 � 391.14
90 IMVER 6RQVE HTS 1.18597� 634.44 0.7353z 393.39 � 1,427.83
91 L.AKEVILLE 0.3496z 187.03 � 0.66B47c 357.58 : 544. 60
94 MQ�OTA ffI6fiT5 0.4450'f� 238.09 0.53307� 285.1T � 5z3.26
98 ROSE?101JFlT 0.27821� 148.84 0.31927c 1T0.79 1 319.63
99 SOUTH ST PAUL 1.58697� 848.99 0.7579f� 4U5.45 � 1,254.44
102 Y5T ST PALIL 0. OOBOt 4. 27 0. 8672f 463. 95 � �68. P2
Henneoin Coanty
114 B�OOISIN6TON 0.92077� 442.55 5.2813x Z,e25.48 � 3,318.02
115 BRC10!(LYN CEMER 0.11687c 62. 50 1. 339Sx �16. 65 � • 779.14
116 BROOKLYN PARK 1.SOOOx 602.52 1.7436z 932.85 � l,735.3T
120 CRYSTAL� 0.1618f 97.24 0.8413x 450.12 i 547.36
12P DEEPFIAVEN 0.1018x 57.67 0.2702f 144.� � 202.P1
1�3 E�EN PRAIRIE 4.1051x 2,196.24 1.6168x 664.99 � 3,061.?3
iZ4 mINR 2.0911x 1,118.71 4.1108x 2,199.29 � 3,318.01
126 60LDEJ�11 Vi�LI.EY P. 3748x 1, P70. 54 1. 64737c 881. 32 t 2,151. 66
130 �PKINS 1.165�87c 623.71 0.8528t 461.58 � 1, OA5.29
132 LON6 U� 0.118b7c 63. �5 0. 0893X 47. 76 ; 111. Zl
134 MRPLE 6ROVE 0.2�53x 1�0.53 1.10307� 590.10 � 710.63
135 MAPLE PLAIN 0.0425x P2.78 0.0625x 33.45 � 5� Zs'
138 MIM�APOLIS 39.71857� P1,249.39 16.68157c 8,924.62 : 30,174.02
140 KINi�EiUNF(A 0. 6976x 480.21 3.0523x 1, 633. 00 � 2,113 PO
142 IiOIJND 0.00037c 0.15 0. 3840x POS. �5 � 205.60
143 t�il F�PE 1.12617c 602. 45 0. 9895z 529. 40 � 1,131. �
� 46 PLYl1�1lTH 0.19785 105. B4 2 27727� 1, 21 B. 30 � l, 324.14
147 RICFF'IELD 1.6062x 752.32 1.48171 742.68 � 1,545.00
148 RIIBBIttSDR1.E 0.8740t 467.60 0.52057c 278.44 t 74b.04
153 ST Wt+IT?fOh'Y (JTl 0.0231t , 12.34 0.4013X � P1�.71 1 �7.05
155 ST LOUIS PAR1( 2 0502t 1,096.84 2.5915x 1,388.05 � 2,48ti.89
157 WAYZpTA 0.39447c Z11.29 0.3938x 210.68 f 421. %
Rarsey County
177 FALCON tEI6HT5 0.0531Z 28.39 0.�965x 105.11 � 133.50
163 t� BRI6HTON 0.1828X 47.79 0.99337c 531.39 ; 629.17
185 NORTH ST AAUL 0.1409x 75.38 0.3976x 212.73 � 288.11
166 ROSEVILI.E 0.2027X 108.46 2.17007c 1,160.94 : 1,269.40
190 ST P�ilL 11. 331 Bt 6, 062. 52 10. 5712't 5, 655. 58 � 11, 718.10
192 {�IITE BFAR l.A� 0..0891X 47.65 6. 83867c 448.65 t 496. 30
CITY OF MEFdDOT� HEIGHTS
BIDS RECEIVE�
$260, 000 EQUI Pf1E��T CEP,TI FI CATES
ACCQUNT RATES OISCOUPIT � COST % RATE
FIRST QAtlK 6.75y 1986/89 �1,300.00 $57,950.00 6.9819
St. Paul , h�n. 7 1990
A��ERICAP� NATIOP�,qL BAt��K & TRUST C0. 6.90� 1986/1990 1,150.OQ 5i�,420.00 7.038?
St. f�aul , f4n.
PIPER JAFFRAY b HOP4JOOD
t�!i nneapol i s, Mn.
MILLE° SCNRCDEP,PIUNICIPALS
Minneapolis, �"n.
1.30" 1986
7.40 1987
1.10 1988
7 198 9
7.20 199Q
1�288.40 60,568.40 1.2977
7.50°� �966/90 1.300.Q0 63,550.00 7.656:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 31, 1985
T0: Mayor, City Council and City ��in'�r,�tor
✓
FROM: James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Sale of Park Truck (501)
DISCUSSION:
The City purchased a new 3/4 ton, 4 wheel drive pickup truck for the
r=; Parks Department this year. That left the old truck (501) as an excess
` vehicle needing to be disposed of. Staff recently took bids by advertising
in the Sun and the Sunday edition of the St. Paul Dispatch.
:,�
Six bids were received:
James R. Ayotte
Adolph Palm
Newport Auto Sales
Harry Kirsher
Thomas E. Delsing
Doug Swaser
$3,050.00
3,026.99
2,805.00
2,395.61
2,376.01
2,Q01.85
(Loan value is listed at $2,200 and a minimum bid of $2,000 was set)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends selling Unit 501 to James R. Ayotte for his high bid
of $3,050.00.
ACTION REQUIRED•
If Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation they should
pass a motion authorizing the sale.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 31, 1985
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Ad ���tor
FROM: Kethleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Commiaaion Term Expirationa
INFORMATION
Attached is a letter from Planning Commission Chairperson Cameron
Kruse in which Cam informs Mayor Lockwood of his decision to resign his
membership on the Commission at the end of hia current term. The term
will expire on January 31at. The terms of five other commission
membera, Plenning Commisaioners Burke and Stefani and Park
Commissioners Doffing, Knittig and Leffert, will also expire on that
date.
DISCUSSION
The fall issue of the newsletter will be printed and delivered in
the very near future. Since the newaletter is the most widely
circulated and ef£ective public in£ormation tool available to us, we
will, unless otherwiae directed by Council, include an article on
Commisaion term expirationa and potential vacanciea. In the article,
we will alao aolicit "applicationa" for Commisaion appointment.
ACTION RE�UIRED
No formal action is required at this time, unless Council wishes
to direct a letter of acknowledgement and appreciation to Chairman
Kruae. Since the reaignation ia not immediately effective, it might be
more eppropriate to make a formal preaentation of appreciation C£or
inatance, a plaque or certificate> at a meeting closer to the date of
term expiration.
,
�
MINNESOTA: Minneapolis, Hibbing, St. Cloud, Rochester, St. Paul
Affiliated Oflices.
NORTH UAKOTA: Bismarck, Williston; MONTANA: Billings
920 Cheri Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
October 25, 1985
;Y::�: Robert Lockwood, Mayor
''�� City of Mendota Heights
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Dear Bob:
. . .., . . ,. . ,.
B�� ■��,.
ENGINEERING TESTING
Inwrpu�atetl
Services Since 1957
J.S. BRAUN, P.E. G.O. KLUEi. E
P,H. ANDERSON DALE R. ALLEN, P E
C.G. KRUSE, P.E. JAMES J. CRAIG. Jr P
D.R. NAUSLER, P.E.
Reply To:
OC?' 2, 8 ;�$�
After considerable thought, I have decided that I would like to
resign my membership on the Planning Commission at the end of
this year. I believe that will fulfill my current term.
I have certainly enjoyed the opportunity to be of service to the
City. I have made many friends among Commission members, Council
members and staff.
., However, I wish to devote more time to my church activities. To
- do so I have to give up other things, one of them being the
Planning Commission.
I will not lose my interest in City activities; but will be
active from the "audience" rather than from a Commission posi-
tion.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
��
-' ���
C. G. Kruse
CGK:gec
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / SOILS AND MATERIALS
_ Affiliated Company for Chemical 8 Environmental Testing and Consulting — Braun Environmental Laboratories, Inc.
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 31, 1985
TO: Meyor, City Council, City i��tor
F'ROM: Kathleen M. Swanaon
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Uniform Fire Code
Ordinance Amendment
INFORMATION
While recently researching provisions of the Uniform Fire Code and
City Ordinancea, Fire Merahal Faul Kaiaer diacovered that the City
Ordinance which adopts the fire code referencea the 1973 �ditian. The
edition which Paul has been and should be enforcing ia the 1982
edition. We have prepared a very brie£ amendment to updete the City's
Ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION/ACTION REQUIRED
--------------------- --------
••� Staff recommends adoption of the attached proposed ordinance. If
Council concura in the recommend�tion it should move adoption of
Ordinance No. 219, "AN ORDINANCE AMfiNDING ORDINANCE NO. 1007."
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE N0. 219
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 1007
The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, ordains as
follows:
SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 1007, known and referred to as "An Ordinance
Adopting the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code by Reference" is hereby amended in
the following respects:
Section 1 of said Ordinance No. 1007 is hereby amended in its
entirety so that as amended it shall read as follows:
SECTION 1. Uniform Fire Code
The Minnesota Uniform Fire Code (1982 Edition), including all
appendices and supplementary material thereto, one copy of which has
been marked as the "official copy" and which is on file in the Office.
of the City Clerk, is hereby adopted as the Fire Code for the City of
Mendota Heights for the purpose of prescribing regulations governing
conditions hazardous to life and property from fire or explosion,
except such portions thereof as are modified or amended by Section 4
of this Ordinance. Every provision contained in said Code, except as
modified or amended by this ordinance, is hereby adopted and made a
part of this ordinance as if f ully set forth herein.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after its publication according to law.
Enacted and ordained into an ordinance this Sth day of November, 1985.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Robert G. Lockwood
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
�
MEMORANDUM
T0: Mayor and City uncil
City Admi ' �
FR4M; Chief af ol���
SUBJECT: Permission to Trap Beaver
introduction
Thomas Heaney, i 81 S Vailey Curve is again befng victimized by beaver and
wc�uld like to have the cQuncil waive our trapping ordinance so h� can trap
on his prooert�.
�..�4�G
Every year at this iime we have a mfgratfon of beaver from the Dodge
Nature Center. The animal population is sa high that they have to spread
� out in order to survive. One of the areas they seem to like is Mr. Neaney's
back yard They haYe remaved a great number af his trees, caused flooding
and advanced to within a hundred feet of his home to find more building
materia�s. The councii has apprc�ved Heaney's request �n past years.
Di�cussion
Alth�ugh we all love animals and en�Qy being able to view them in our
area, these particuiar rodents are na benefit to the City. (n years past they
"�' have cic�gged the drainage culveri under Marie� Avenue, removed trees from
Valley Park and nearly dropped a� large tree on the park shelter. If they are
not stopped at Heaney's properi.y the City may end up resp�nsible f�r
stopping them somewhere else. We have t�ad numeraus complaints from
�- residents on Valley Curve and Traii Road as weil. The Department af
Natural Resources h�s lndfcated ihat the probiem is �ne of aver population
and the trapping on Heaney's land is not going to impact the beaver world
in any significant manner. �ur office only received twa complaints abaut
the trapping last year. One concerned an egret which was caught in a trap.
The bird was released, c�nharmed, by a paiice ofiicer. The oiher was from a
person who mistakenly thought that the area involved was Valley Park.
R��co�end�ti4n
It is our fee�ling that the beavers have a negative impact and therefore
reccQmend that the ordinar�ce be waived so that Mr. Heaney can trap beaver
on his property as ]ong as he complies with all state laws and Department
of Natural Resource poiicies and pracedures.
Action Rea�aired
That cc�uncil grant a waiver ta the Mendota Heighis trapping �rdinance to
Mr. Thamas Heaney specificaily for trapping beaver on his praperty at 1818
Vaiiey Curve.
, f�:�,�-� � .
��'
,�-�� .��:.� -�
� �...�-t.�:.� ,��_
�
� � �-i�
���
� �'�
���
United HealthCare Corporation
300 Opus Center • 9900 Bren Raad East
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 • {6I2) 936-13QQ
�'�/� ° r.�"
�.�-,ti, .�--�_
�2'��,t�� i�j�rG2.� c�.�+.-t ��t-.� `
�'��r� G'i'1.�.e�. '/h.�- -f'
�i�� . ��,^,�
� / � �o��" C-� �'-��-� .
/i�C .�� �-���`-�,-
�. �.��.�_�
�
. � ; � - ��GE'�,.�, G:t,w...�.
�� Z- -- o s/ a �_'� �
l "� G .� i � . ' �--' : .
..�—
�"�.rc.
�' / / r
�. .
�� � ��
1
�� �,�
�----,�,���----� ,
�
d��
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November l, 1985
�/
T0: Mayor, City Council and City��s�o
FROM: Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer
SUBJECT: IR Bond Revenue Consideration for Mendota Heights Associates
INTRODUCTION:
At the October 15 Council meeting a hearing was held on a proposed Housing
' Program and Housing Revenue Program calling for approval of a 592 unit, $40,000,000
� four stage program.
The hearing was held and closed, however, no action was taken as the developer
iindicated he needed approval of all phases to proceed.
�
r
Councilmember Blesener raised the question as to whether the 20� of the units
reserved for low and moderate income residents could be restricted to senior citizens.
Our attorneys advise that statutes do not permit such reservation.
PROPOSAL
Mendota Heights Associates is preparing a new multi-family development plan of
300 units, which it feels will meet the objectives and policies adopted by Council
in the Southeast Area Comprehensive Plan amendments. Architect Steve Young will be
prepared to present that plan to Council.at Tuesday's meeting. Actual approval of
the project rezoning and planned unit development/conditional use permit will not be
formally before you Tuesday evening. However, Council will want to decide whether it
would approve such a plan at a subsequent meeting, before deciding whether to give
,preliminary approval to any multi-family mortgage revenue bonds for the project.
As before, final authorization to sell bonds before year's end should be made
contingent upon Council adoption of a f inal development plan. �
On preliminary review, the Bond Attorneys have indicated
amend the Housing Program to a lesser project, and approve the
bond issues necessary to finance the proposed program.
ACTION REQUIRED
that the Council may
portion of the
If Council agrees to proceed, by resolution amend the program to the project
to be approved, and adopt enough $10,000,000 resolutions for bonds to finance the
amended program.
P.S. Please be sure to bring your housing packages from the October 15th meeting.
�:*
::
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November 1, 1985
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. Fr���C�1.ty Administrator
,/
SUBJECT: Tandem Preliminary Plat (Case No. 85-23)
INTRODUCTION
At the October 15th meeting, Council gave preliminary plat approval to
the Tandem development. Since that time, Tandem has made a few changes,
which are before you for your approval tonight.
PRELIMINARY PLAT AMENDMENT
Subsequent to the October 15th meeting, Councilmember Blesener raised a
couple of questions about the cul=de-sac and the eyebrow in the northwestern
part of the plat. Tandem has made a few changes in this area, as well as in
other parts of the plat. Attached is a memo from them outlining those changes.
They would like to get Council concurrence with those changes before they start
to draft the final plat.
� The Parks Commission is still scheduled to consider the park dedication issue
at its November 12th meeting. A"working group" of Jim Malkowski and Thomas Mairs
of the Dodge Nature Center, Barry Warner, of Barton-Aschman, Jim Danielson, and
the developers, walked the site last week. Their recou�endation is that the pond
should be protected by scenic easement, rather than public dedication, and that
the strip through the middle would be desireable park property. Apparently the only
•- question not resolved by the group was whether there should be a hard surface bike
trail through the middle or if it should be left as open space. Again, the Parks
Commission will be�considering their recommendation and� making a f inal recommendation
to the Council at their November 12th meeting, which will come back to you on
November 19th.
DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT
Also attached is a developers agreement between Tandem and the City, which was
prepared by Jim Danielson. Council should review and approve this develope�s agree-
ment, so that we can begin work on the feasibility study.
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
The Council has also asked that at some time.during consideration of this
project, it be allowed to see the restrictive covenants. A copy of the covenants
as prepared by Tandem is submitted for information.
Please recall that restrictive covenants are a document outside the perview
of the City, above and beyond normal zoning restrictions. The City does not
get involved in approving or enforcing covenants, and I would strongly recommend
- 2 -
that we continue that precedent, so that we dan't get drawn in as a third
parCy to any future disputes over ttte covenants.
ACTION REQUIRED
- Review the praposed amendments to the preliminary plat, and if they are
satisfactary, pass a motion approving thase amendments to �he plat approved
an October 15th.
- Review and take ac�ion to approve the developers agreement, and accept
the_petitaton far sanitary, starm --ewer, water and street impravements and
waiver of hearing.
>..
-y
�
KDF;madlr
attachmen.ts
0
November 1, 1985
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1985
3:30 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
NOTICE is hereby given that, pursuant to City Ordinance No. 102, Section
18, Mayor Robert Lockwood has called a special meeting for the City Council
for the time and place specified above.
The purpose of the special meeting shall be to be presented with a development
proposal by Mendota Heights Associates for their property in the southeast area
�''''� of the City. The Council will then move to the situs property for a walking tour.
• This is to be an informational meeting only, and any action with respect to the
proposed development will be at subsequent, regularly scheduled Council meetings. �
AGENDA:
1. Roll Call.
2. Adopt Agenda.
�.••. 3. Presentation by City Planner Dahlgren of proposed development.
4. Walking tour of development site.
5. Adjourn.
�� � ����
thleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
c�op�
Consulting Planners One Groveland Terrace (612 377-35 6
Minneapolis �
• Minnesota 55403
Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban/Incorporated
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 4 November 1985
T0: Mendota Heights Council
FROM: John Shardlow, AICP
RE: Proposed Amendments to the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency's Rules Governing Airport Noise
Larry Schaughnessy has brought to my attention the fact that
the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is proposing to adopt
new rules to cover airport noise pollution. As at least many
of you will recall, these amendments have been anticipated for
some time. However, I have heard nothing about their progress
for •the last several months and there are several aspects of
the proposed rules which I do not think the City of Mendota
Heights can comply with.
Over the course of nearly three years, I attended meetings with
MAC, the Metropolitan Council, PCA, MN/DOT, and all of the
communities which surround the Minneapolis St. Paul
International Airport, in an effort to arrive at a process for
addressing airport noise compatibility planning issues.
Although many difficult issues remained to be settled, this
effort basically ended with the adoption by the Metropolitan
Council of a revised Airport Chapter of the Metropolitan
Development Guide.
To make a lon� and frustrat�ing story short, from that point
forward it has been understood that the next step is for each
of the affected communities to amend their comprehensive plans
to comply with the new Met Council Airport Chapter. Since day
one, we have made it clear that we cannot and will not comply
with these guidelines completely, but that we would make those
changes which were reasonable to improve the situation.
The Metropolitan Council s.taff has most recently been saying
that they expect that the Mendota Heights Plan will include
some reasonable attempt to camply with the guidelines and that
they would accept that compromise. Much of the effort from the
0
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS, � NOVEMBER 19$5
Page 2
begi.nning of the joint agencies meetings was directed at
coordinating the amendment of the PCA t�oise Regula�ions with
the Met Council Airport Chapter. That never happened.
The proposed ru2es which Larry sent me ar�e not the same as the
Metropolitan Council Land Use Compatibility Planning
Guidelines. That means that the City af Mendota Heights could
amend its plan and gain the approval of the Met Couneil and be
.in vialatian of State Law. That has frankly always struek me
as somewhere between ridiculous and an outright insult to the
pub].ic whieh these ageneies serve.
The proposed rules attempt to transfer a portion of the legal
responsibiiity for airpor� noise ort ta the munieipal�.ties.
They also seem to con�ain more stringent standards �han I have
ever seen before as well. Obviousiy, if we eould nat eamply
with the former standards, we will be even farther fram meeting
these.
I think that it wauld be appropriate to cantaet a].1 of the
affected cities and, if possible, join with them in opposing
these rules as drafted. At the very least, the City should
suhmit wri�ten eamments ta the Adrrtinistra�ive Law judge making
the record very clear that there are still major problems wi.th
this whole issue. The eity eould plaee itself in a very
vulnerable legal position relative to a future homeowner law
suit if this system were to proceed as praposed.
cc: Kevin Frazell
Larry Sehaughnessy ��
Howard Dahlgren
Page No. 2387
Noveinber 4, 1985
CITY OF MLNDUTA i�IEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNI;SO'CA
Minutes ot the Special Meeting
Held Mond<3y, November 4, 1985
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the special meeting of the City Council,
� City of Mendota Heights, was held at 3:30 o'clock P.M., at City Hall, 750 South
Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 3:38 o'clock P.M. The following
members were present: Mayor Lockwood, Councilmembers Blesener, Hartmann and Witt.
Councilmember Cummins had informed the Council Chat he would be unable to attend.
AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of the agenda for the
meeting.
Councilmember [ditt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
MENDOTA HEIGHTS Planner Dahlgren briefly presented the latest plan developed
ASSOCIATES PROPOSED by Steve Young, the architect retained by Mendota Heights
DEVELOPr1ENT Associates. Mr. Dahlgren noted that the larger buildings of
75 units were on the southerly part of the development site,
nearest the freeway, with smaller buildings in the north near
Mendota Heights Road.
WALKING TOUR OF SITE The Council then moved to the site of the proposed develop-
ment, where the City Planner and architect had placed markers
designating the approximate locations of the buildings in the
proposed development.
ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council,
Councilmember Hartmann moved that the meeting be adjourned.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
TIP1E OF ADJOURNMENT: 4:54 o'clock P.M.
Kevin D. rrazell
City Administrator
ATTEST:
Robert G. Lockwood
Mayor
, c
11/5/85 CLAIMS LIST
aMOUNT
87.24
87.24 * �
318.20
394.00
712 . 20 *�
47$.95
478.96 �
81.50
81 .60 *✓
25.00
25 . 0 0 *,�
3.47
345.00
348.47 �
30.00
30.00 �
50.00
50.00 */
30.00
10.00
10.00
50.00 ��
10.00
10.00 �
11.00
11.00 �
140.19
140.19 *,�
` 2.10
6.51
5.28
8.05
21 . 94 * �
45�.00
�45.00 *�
�95.00
2,941.00
, �436 . 00 * �
74.65
74.65 *�
CHECK REGIS`�
VENDOR
AC.E�ANDER MFG CO
AUTOCON INDUSTRIE$
AUTOCON INDUSTRIES
CLAREY8 SAFETY EQ
CAPITOL SUPPLY CO
DAKOTA COUNTY CC
DAVIES WATER EQ
DAVIES WATER E�
LEAONARD ENDRESEN
INTL AS�N CH POLICE
COUNTY RECORDER
COtJNTY RECORDER
COUNTY RECORDER
TREAS ST /y%Y PETR DIV
M A M A C WILLIAMS
NATL FIRE PROTECTION
PROEX PHOTO
PROEX PHOTO
PROEX PHOTO
PROEX PHOTO
RADIATOR SVC CO
PROFE8SIONAL SVCS
PROFEBSIONAL SVCS
SPEED PRINT INC
Dept 10-Admin Dept 50-Rd&Bridge
� � 15-Engr 60-Utilities
E 20-Police 70-Parks
30-Fire 80-Planning
ITEM DE&CRIP��O�� AC����QCon��l
BATTERY 01-4330-440-20 1i1
RPR8 RECORDER
RPRS RECORDER
BUNKER PANT$/COAT8
6ASKET3
ANNL DUES
FLANGES
MIRAFI
LETTER CITY CAR
DUES86
FILING FEES
FILING FEES
FILIMG FEES
LICENSERENEWAL
LUNCHEON MT6
TRNG SPLYS
FILM DEV
FILM DEV
FILM DEV
FILM DEV
HEATER CORE
MAC DRIVE
IBM VT
FORM$
15-4330-490-60 1'�
15-4330-�90-b0 t:'
12-4530-000-00 1ti
15-4305-Ob0-b0 Q"f.
01-4404-110-10
15-4330-490-60 tc
15-4330-490-b0 1"c
01-4490-110-10
01-�404-Q20-20
10-4475-000-00
�7-4475-812-00
97-4475-�25-00
01-4320-O50-SO
01-4400-110-10
01-4403-030-30 fi9
01-4305-030-30 24
01-4305-030-30 24
Ot-4305-030-30 25
01-4305-030-30 25
15-4330-490-60 98
12-4b00-000-00 80
12-4b00-000-00 47
01-4305-020-20 41
+MOUlVT
4.30
3.01
1.2fi
8.57 *�
519.35
519.35 *i
313.21
313.2i #i
1$.2$
21.80
40 . 0� ��
3 . 77 �.
6.01
4.50
6.02
6.02
26.32 */
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
AT�T COMM LD CALLS
AT3T COMM LD CALLS
AT�T COMM LD CALLS
CRAIJFORD DOOR SALES DOOR RPRS
LE ROY NOACK FIRECH CONV
ALBINSON MISC SPLYS
ALBINSON MYLR
AT � T INFO SYSTEMS OCT SVC
AT � T INFO SYSTEMS OCT SVC
AT d� T INFO SYSTEMS 3RD QTR
AT � T INFO SYSTEMS OCT SVC
AT � T INFO SYSTEMS OCT SVC
3.37 B�J AUTO SPLY BELT
3.37 */
3.75 BD WATER COMNIISSION SEPT SVC
3.75 BD WATER COMMISSION SEPT SVC
117.22 BD WATER COMMISSION SEPT SVC
3.76 � BD 41ATER COMMIS8ION SEPT SVC
128.�$ *
43.05
43.05 * ,
25.11
25 . 1 1 *i
BROWN PHOTO
CARTER BOB FORD INC
FILM
PARTS
724.25 CASE POWER�EQUIP RADIATOR�PARTS
724 . � fi * /
� •
ACCOUNT N0. INV�.
01-4210-420-_
01-4C10-030-30
01-�210-110-10
01-�335-315-30 1�
01-4400-030-30
OS-4300-105-15 2�
95-4282-822-00 2•�
Ot-4210-Oc�0-20
01-4210-OSO-50
01-4210-070-70
01-4210-070-70
15-42i0-060-50
� 15-4305-060-b0 0'.
01-4425-310-50
01-4425-310-TO
01-4425-315-30
15-4425-310-50
01-4305-030-30 2�
01-4330-460-30 2!
15-4330-490-6 �i
�MOUNT
� 15.07
4.99
ib.49
5.94
�2.49 *�
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
CITY MOTOR SUPP�Y PARTS
CITY MOTOR SUPPI.Y ANCO
CITY MOTOR SUPPLY GATES
CITY MOTOR SUPP�Y A C _••
3.03 COAST TO COAST
2.55 COAST TO COAST
7.99 COAST TO COAST
3.11 COAST TO COAST
.85 COA�T TO COA&T
17.53 *�
244.00
244.00 *�
1,242.00
1,242.00 *i
1,601.00
905.00
1,6b4.00
4, 170. 00 �s/
120.00
120.00 */
17.02
175.00
192.02 �-
214.04
214 . 04 *,
CONWAY FIRE � SAFETY
DAHL6RENSHARDLOWUBAN
DCR CORP.
DCR CORP.
DCR CORP.
DENNIS DELMONT
FRAZELL KEVIN
FRAZELL KEVIM
'600DYEAR SERVICE STR
ADAPTER
CLNG SP�YS
THINNER
MARKERS
KEY
SPANNER BELT/LOOP
SEPT SVC
NOV RENT
NOV RENT
NOV R ENT
NOV ALLOW
TEAM BLD6
NOV ALLOtJ
TIRES/BAL
132.31 ICMA RC 10/25 PAAYROLL
b6.19 ICMA RC 10/25 PAYROLL
19$.SO *�
250.00 IDS LIFE IN8 CO NOV PYMT
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
01-4305-050-50 1�
01-4305—O70—TO 1F
01-4330-440-20 1�
15-4305-060-60 1�
Ot-4305-020—PO 4c
01-4305-030-30 41
Ot-4305-030-30 41
01-4305-030-30 41
01-4305-030-30 42
Ot-4305-030-30 T6
01-4221-135-80
01—�F200—b04-1 0
01-4200-600-20
OS-4200—fi00-15
01-4415-021-20
01-4�02-110-10
01-4415-110-10
01-4330-440-20 40
01-2072-000-00
01-4134-110-10
01-2072-000-00 13�
�'OUNT
250.00 * �
i,031.25 ,
i,031.25 *i
12.18
12.1$
12.18
36 . 54 *�
$.41
10.00 .
10.25
7b.fi7
1 05.33 *�
153.00
i53.00 *�
32.32
300.00
54.35
39b . 67 */
9.00
9.00
9.00
27.00 */
974.15
17.59
94.90
17. fi0
562.45
6$.55
17.55
T,757.79 *�
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
KAI8ER PAUL
KAT KEYS
KAT KEYS
KAT KEYS
KNUTH TOM
KNUTH TOM
4CNUTH TOM
KNUTH TOM
LELS
LMCIT HP PLAN
LMCIT HP PLAM
LMCIT HP PLAN
LEEF BROS INC
LEEF BROS INC
LEEF BR03 INC
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
OCTOBER TIME
�3 MASTER
�#k3MASTER
1�3MASTER
MI THRU 10/29
NOVALLOW
MI THRU 10l20
MI THRU 10/20
NOV DUES
NOV PREM
MOV PREM
NOV PREM
OCT SVC
OCT SVC
OCT SVC
SEPT SVC
3EPT SVC
$EPT SVC
SEPT SVC
$EPT SVC
SEPT SVC
SEPT SVC
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
01-4268-150-30
01-4305-050-50 81'
01-4305-070-70 81'
15-4305—Ob0-60 81'
05-4415-105-15
OS—�415-105-15
. • -,-
51-4�15-925-00
98-4�15-82b-00
01-2075-000-0�
01-2074-000-00 041
01-4131-020-20 041
01-4131-021-20 041
01-4335-310-50 569
01-4335-310-70 5$0
]5-4335-310-60 580
01-4214-110-10 098
03-4214-000-00 098
OS-4214-105-15 098
10-4214-000-00 098
15-4214-060—b0 098
1b-4214-000-00 AQ8
21-4214-000-00 �
AMOUNT
48.00
24.00
12.00
12.04 .
96.00 *,
7.80
i2.45
6.80
97.10
31.90
25.69
2.55
5.45
4.85
194.59 */
494.25
836.50
436.00
155.00
467.25
•192.05
58z.50
580.25
155.00
�, 09$ . $0 *..�
833.33-
3,366.00
22,227.65
2,483.33-
22,b75.99 *�
96.11
112.80
112.80
321 . i 1 �/
63.13
61.30
b3.t3
63.13
b3.13
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
M A ASSOCIATEB
M A ASSOCIATES
M A ASSOCIATES
M A ASSOCIATES
M�W
ME�W
M�W
M3W
M�W
M3�W
M�W
M�W
M�W
IMC
INC
INC
INC
INC
INC
IMC
INC
IMC
CANONPROD
CANONPROD
CANONPROD
CANONPROD
CANONPROD
CANOMPROB
CANONPROD
CANONPROD
CANONPROD
MEDCENTERS
MEDCENTER$
MEDCENTERS
MEDCENTERS
MEDCENTERS
MEDCENTERS
MEDCENTERS
MEDCENTERS
MEDCENTERS
HP
HP
HP
HP
HP
HP
HP
HP
HP
METRO 1JASTE CONTROL
METRO WASTE CONTROL
METRO WASTE CQNTROL
METRQ WASTE CONTROL
MIDWEST WIRE-STEEL
MIDWEST WIRE-3TEEL
MIDWEST WIRE-STEEL
MI�LER PRINTIN6
MILLER PRINTIN6
MILLER PRINTING
MILLER PRINTIN6
MILLER PRINTIN6
ITEM DESCRIPTION
WINDSHIELD SOLVENT
SINDSHIELD SOLVENT
WIND8HIELD SOLVENT
WINDSHIE��D SOLVENT
OCT MTCN
OCT MTCN
OCT MTCN
OCT MTCN
OCT MTCN
OCT MTCN
OCT MTCN
OCTMTCN
OCTMTCN
NOVPREM
NOV PREM
NOV PREM
NOV PREM
NOV PREM
NOV PREM
NOV PREM
NOVPREM
NOVPREM
SEPT
SEPT
SEPT
SEPT
SEPT
SEPT
SEPT
SEPT
SEPT
NOVINSTALL
OCT SAC CHGS
NOVINSTALL
NOVINSTALL
P03TS
T POSTS
T P08TS
RECEIPT BOOKS
BLD6 PERMIT&
RECEIPT BOOKS
RECEIPT BOOKS
RECEIPT BOOK&
ACCOUNT N0. INV
01-4305-020-�0
01-4305-050-50
01-4305-070-70
15-�305-Ob0-b0
COPIES 01-4300-030-30
COPIES 01-4300-040-40
COPIES 01-4300-080-80
COPIES 01-4300-110-10
COPIES 01-4305-020-20
�COPIES 05-4300-105-15
COPIES 10-4300-000-00
COPIES 15-4300-060-b0
COPIES 23-4300-000-00
01-2074-000-00
01-�131-020-20
01-4131-021-20
01-4131-040-�0
01-4131-050-50
Qt-4131-070-70
01-�131-110-10
OS-4131-105-i5
15-4131-060-fi0
14-3575-000-00
15-4448-060-60
15-�449-060-60
17-3575-000-00
01-4305-070-70
01-44�0-050-50
01-4420-050-50
01-4300-040-40
01-4300-040-40
01-4300-110-10
01-4305-020-20
05-4300-105-15
At10•1ltuT
63.13
376 . 95 * �
24.95.
24.95
10.00
230.00
8.00
98.00
5.00
8.00
15.00
19�.50
94 . 0 0'
715.40' *�
150.00
150.00 *i
192.04
100.04
292.00 *�
213.45
168.88
72.02
112.36
285.65
76.b7
354.69
�� . 283 . 72 *i
:
130.00
90.00
�LZ� . 0� *r
1,240.04
1,240.00 *�
5.00
b.00 *,/
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
MILLER PRINTIN6
MINN BENEFIT
MINN BENEFIT
MINN HENEFIT
MINN BENEFIT
MINN BENEFIT
MIIVN BENEFIT
MINN �ENEFIT
MINN BENEFIT
MINN BENEFIT
MIfVN BENEFIT
MINN BENEFIT
AS�N
A&SN
ASSN
ASSN
A&SN
ASSN
A&SN
ASSN
ASSN
ASSN
ASSN
MN DEPT PUBLICSAFETY
0
MINN FIRE INC
MINN FIRE INC
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTH4)ESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWEBTERN BELL
NQRTHWE&TERN BELL
OAK CREST KENNELS
OAK CREST KENMELS
ORFEI � SOMS INC
OXY6EN $ERVICE CO
ITEM DESCRIPTION
RECEIPT BOOKS
OCT PREM
NOV PREM�
NOV PREM
NOV PREM
OCT PREM
NOV PREM
NOV PREM
NOV PREM
NOV PREM
NOV PREM
NOV PREM
3RDQTR CONN CHG
RECHAR6E/PARTS
DRY CHEM
OCT SVC
OCTSVC
OCT SVC
OCT SVC
OCT SVC
OCT �VC
OCT SVC
OCT SVC
OCT SVC
FINAL 85-1
OXY
2�2.06' PINE BEND PAVIN6 INC FIME MIX
ACCOUNT N0. IN�.
15-4300-06Q �5
01-2474-000-00
�� 01-2074-000-00
01-2074-000-00
01-4131-020-20
01-4131-021-20
01-4131-021-20
01-4131-021-20
01-4131-070—TO
Oi-4131-070-70
01-4131-110-10
OS-4131-105-15
01-4200-600-20
01-4305-030-30
01-4305-030-30
01-4210-020—�u
01-4210-030-30
01-4210-050-50
01-4210-070—TO
01-42i0-110-10
OS-4210-105-15
15-4210—Ob0-60
01-4221-800-90
01-4225-800-90
97-4460-8Z5-00
01-4305-030-30 9,
01-4422-050—SO 4
AMOUNT
22�.05 *•�
134.53
70.00
20�.53 *�
20.29
20.8�
3.55
3.55—
47.72
5$.93
147.82 *i
fi2.00
62.00
b2.00
52.00
G2.00
62.00
372.00 �
40.00
40 . 00 */
1,054.55
71.00
91.25
755.45
. �
187.60
225.60
149.55
2,535.00 �
42.bb
32.50
29.25—
45.91 * �
CHECK RE6ISTER
VENDOR
PRUDENTIAL
PRUDENTIAL
S�T OFFICE PROD
S�T OFFICE PROD
S�T OFFICE PROD
S�T OFFICE PROD
S�T OFFICE PROD
S�T OFFICE PROD
SATELLITE INDUST INC
SATELLITE INDUST INC
SATELLITE INDUST INC
SATELLITE INDU3T INC
SATELLITE INDUST INC
SATELLITE INDUST INC
SELANDER DUANE C
SHAUGHNESSY L E JR
SHAU6HNESSY L E JR
SHSU6HNESSY L E 3R
SHAUGHNESSY L E JR
SHAi16HNES3Y L E JR
SHAU6HNESSY L E JR
SHAU6HNESSY L E JR
SHA�J LUMBER CO
SHAu LUMBER CO
SHA41 LUMBER CO
ITEM DESCRIPTION
NOV PREM•
NOV PREM
MISC SPLY3
MISC SPLYS
HILITER
HILITER RETD
CAT ENVS
CAT ENVS
RENT THRU 10�10 MAR
RENT THRU 10/10 FH
RENT THRU 10/10 ROG
RENT THRU 10/10 IVY
RENTTHRU 10/10 WENT
RENT THRU 10/10 VP
NOV ALLOW
OCT SVC
OCT SVC
OCT SVC
OCT SVC
OCT SVC
OCT SVC
OCT SVC
LUMBER
LUMHER
LUMBER RETD
6.03 SNYDER DRU6 STORES PAPER TOWELS
5.94 SNYDER DRUG STORE8 PLASTIC PROTECTORS
ACCOUNT N0. INV,
01-20�4-000-00
01—�131-020-20
01-4300-020-20
01-4300-020-20
01-4300-110-10
01-4300-110-10
01-4300-110-10
OS-4300-105-15
01—�200—b10-70
01-4200-610-70
01-4200-610-70
01-4200-610-70
01-4200-610-70
01-4200-610-70
01-4�15-200-70
01-4220-132-10
03-4220-132-04
45-4220-132-15
14-4220-132-00
; _.
15-4220-132-60
16-4220-13E-00
21-4�20-13�-00
01-4330-490-50
01-4330-490-50
01-4330-490-50
01-4305-030-30
01-4305-070-70
AMOUNT
11 .97 */
12.90
27.51
27.51
G7.92 *�
50.40
75.b0
12b.00 */
25.10
25.10
11.39
25.10
25.10
13.38
77.13
15.68
20.92
6.64
245.54 *,i
37.90
37.90 * �
b8 . 26,
34.14
35.1b
23.T2
ib1.30 *•�
86.40
$b . 00 *,�
131.20
131 .20 *�
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
ST PAUL BOOKdSTAT
ST PAUL BOOKSSTAT
ST PAUL BOOKdSTAT
ST PAUL PP�DISPATCH
S7 PAUI PP�DISPATCH
SUN NEWSPAPERS
SUN NEWSPAPERS
SUN NEWSPAPERS
SUN NEWSPAPERS
SUN NEWSPAPER&
SUN NEWSPAPERS
SUN NEWSPAPERS
SUN NEWSPAPERS
SUN NEWSPAPERS
SUN NEWSPAPERS
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UIV I TED CENT TRUSTEE
UNITED CENT TRUSTEE
UNITED CENT TRUSTEE
UNITED CENT TRUSTEE
UNITED WAY-3T PAUL
WE3TERN LIFE INS CO
ITEM DESCRIPTION
SROTHERS� RBN
7APE DISP/FOLDERS
BINDERS
MTCN AD
AD FOR BIDS
HRC NOT MHAPT 3
HR6 NOT MHAPT2
HR6 NOT APPL DELIHUB
HR6 NOT MH APT 4
HR6 NOT MH PROJ 1
ORD 215
8UD6ET STMT
ORD216
ORD 214
AD FOR BIDS TRK/PLOW
GOOSE NEGK LAMPS
NOV PREM
NV PREM
NOV PREM
IVOV PREM
PYMT11 OF 12 NOV
NOV PREM
47�.00� WINTHROP4IEINSTINE�S RE KURTZ
3
ACCOUNT N0. IN1�.
01-4300-020-20 :
01-4300-030-30 :
01-4300-030-30 :
01-4490-07Q-7.0 t
01-4490-O70-TO S
01-4240-080-80
01-4240-080-80
01-4E40-080-80
01-4240-080-80
01-4240-OSO-80
01-4240-110-10
01-4240-110-10
01-4240-114-10
01-4240-110--'
01-4490-070•
Ot-4330-440-20
01-2071-000-00 L
Ot-4132-020-20 L
41-4132-050-50 L
01-4132-070-70 L
01-2070-000-04
01-4132-030-30 3�
01-4220-120-80
MOUNT
500.00
�10.23
97.$0
5,283.03 *i
23,42b.16
$$.59
2,885.51
147.95
3,914.96
77.88—
28,$$5.77
294.15
2,083.33—
1b7.10
4.85
10.25
i0.00
21.80
1,250.00
7b.6?
CHECK REGISTER
VEMDOR
WINTHROPWEINSTINEd�S
WINTHROPWEINSTINE�S
WINTHROPWEINSTINE�S
FUND
FUND
FUND
FUND
FUND
FUND
FUND
FUND
FUND
FUND
FUND
FUND
FUND
FUND
FUND
FUND
59,022.55 TOTAL
MANUAL CHECKS
10887 10.00
10888 44.00
10889 3,994.30
10890 4,700.07
10891 2,610.10
10892 200.00
10893 1,501.26
10894 22,180.31
10895 165.00
10896 39.00
1089Z 5.74
10898 � 793.76
10899 15.00
1Q900 10.00
10901 189.04
10902 40.00
10903 154.00
10904 500.00
10905 4,445.05
10906 Void
1A907 2,605.82
10908 60.00
10909 200.00
10910 1,501.26
10911 22,456.72
10912 10.00
10913 20.00
10914 4,781.52
73,231.95
GT 132,254.50
01
03
45
10
12
14
15
16
17
21
23
51
87
95
97
98
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TO,TAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
MBA
Ramsey Cty Court
Comm Revenue
Dir Int Rev
St Treas SS
DC Bank
SCCU
City MH PR Acct
Empl Edu Svc
Ramsey Cty Court
St MN Document
NSP
No Star ICBO
DNR
City MH PC Acct
St Auditor
Mn St Document
U. S. P�st Ofc
St. Treas PERA
St. Tress SS
DC Bank
��
SCCU
City M.H. Pr
Larrie Mack
MN PoI & Peace Ofc
DC Bank
ITEM DESCRIPTION
3RD OTR
3RD QTR
RE MARIE LOT
GENERAI. FUND
tJATER REVENUE FUND
EN6R ENTERPRISE
SPECIAL PARK FUND
EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES
CONSOLIDATED DEBT 8ERVIC
SE4)ER UTILITY
TID I79-7/81-4/8P-2/82-6
UTIL RE&ERVE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
CASLE TV FRANCHI$E
I79-3 MIRIAM—HIAW DRAINA
I83-4/83-48 CRYC/DAK CTY
I84-460ULD YORKTON
I$S-1 ANDER/CURLEY
I84-6MH RD LEX 55 MSA
Cor�ected Premium
Warrant
SIT 9/27&10/11
FIT 10/11
10/11 FICA
10/11 Payroll
��
��
Regr. K. Frazell
Warrant
Documents Fire Marshall
10/28 Due Date
11/1 Mtg P. Berg
Road Kill Permit
Replen�sh Petty Cash
Regr Fraze�.l, Shau�hnessy
1984 Statutes '85 Laws
Ref ill meter
10/11 Payroll
10/25 FI�A
10/11 & 10/25 Payroll
10/25 Payroll
��
��
Refund ins deduction
Assn '85 &'86 Dues
10/25 FIT
ACCOUNT N0. IMV.
01-4221-120-10
01-4222-120-20
10-4220-120-00
�
m
�
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION N0. 85-
RESOLUTION DEFERRING PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS
(IMPROVEMENT N0. 83, PROJECT N0. 7B)
WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, has calculated
the proper amount to be specially assessed for Improvement No. 83, Project No.
7B, construction of watermain improvements; and
WHEREAS, the hearing on said assessments was duly held at 8:00 o'clock P.M. on
September 17, 1985, at the City Hall of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed assessment roll for said improvements was duly adopted by
the City Council on September 17, 1985; and
'-• WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it would be in the best interest of
��::s
-- the City of Mendota Heights to defer the payment of the assessments with respect
to the above referenced improvements in the following amounts and as to the
following parcels situated in Dakota County, Minnesota, to-wit:
:�:.
Tax Parcel
27-03500-010-77
Owners
Visitation Monastery
2455 Visitation Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Deferred
$ 6,030.00
WHEREAS, that each of the above assessments indicated above as being deferred
would be deferred with the understanding that said amount, plus interest accrued
from September 17, 1985 at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum, would become
immediately payable upon the future development of the parcel to which said
deferred assessment relates.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights, as follows:
1. That the assessment roll for Improvement No. 83, Project No. 7B, be
corrected as set forth above.
2. That upon the future development of any of the above described parcels
necessitating the issuance of a building permit from the City of Mendota
Heights, the deferred amount of said assessment against to the property to
be developed, as more particularly set forth above, will be immediately due
and payable, together with interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per
annum from September 17, 1985.
3. That the City Attorney is hereby directed to file a certified copy
of this resolution in the office of the County Auditor and County Recorder
of Dakota County, Minnesota so that any future purchaser or party interest
relative to any of the above described parcels will be on notice relative to
the deferred assessments described above.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 5th day of
November, 1985.
ATTFST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
»f:
�
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
'
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November 5, 1985
T0: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer
SUBJECT: MPC Regulations
Attached is a letter from John Shardlow relative to the new MPC noise
regulations. He seems to express many of the same frustrations that we have
had for some time between the proposed MPCA and Metropolitan Council noise
regulations.
Based on what I have read, and understand, the City should either require
prior to rule hearings or respond negatively to the following.
1. Require prior to hearing the detailed noise contour maps showing
both LEQ and LDN measurements as specified in the proposed regulations.
2. Oppose any attempt to imply as in 7010:003 any City liability to non-
conforming land uses, especially if inconsistent with Met Council
guidelines.
3. Def ine better proposed City liability and applicable penalties that
apply.
4. Make all references to consistent land uses agree with Met Council
Airport chapter.
S. Base LEQ and LDN equivalents at least consistent with existing L/0
measurements (Apx 67/68 db for Area 1).
MASAC legislative committee will be meeting this week to take a position on these
regulations, and I have previously expressed the City liability and level of
measurement objectives to this group. I personally can't see how we can intelligently
respond to affected land without detail of the contour map. However, with the
material we have from the Met Council work, we can only assume them to be more
restrictive.
ACTION REQUIRED
To consider the above suggested comments, plus any others Council may have,
and direct staff to submit them at the November 19th public hearing.
Council may also want to determine who should submit these comments, or if
they should be in writing.
LES:madlr
attachment
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November S, 1985
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kevin D. e� �
City ministrator
SUBJECT: Add-on Agenda for November 5th, 1985
There are no additions to this evening's agenda. However, additional
information is submitted for item no. 8h., and it�5recommended that Council
"�� adopt an order of agenda different from the one presented with the packet of
information.
Item 2a. Adoption of Agenda
Because of election duties in the City of Eagan, Councilmember Witt can
be present for only approximately one hour of this evening's meeting. Because
of the importance and public interest of items 8a, and 8b, I am recommending
that the Council adopt the agenda with those as the first two items to be
considered, prior even to item 3� Approval of Minutes.
... Item 8h. MPCA Noise Regulations
Attached is a memo from Larry Shaughnessy, and an attachment from John
Shardlow, suggesting possible comments that the City might want to make at
the public hearing on the proposed noise guidelines.
KDF:madlr -
attachment
LIS7 OF 1985 CONTRACTORS TO 8E APPROVED BY GITY COUNCIL ON NOVEMBER 5, 19$5
Gas Piping License:
Parsons Hardware
General Contractor's License:
Developers Construction
Oreskovich Builders, Inc.
B.B.K. Construction, Inc.
Dennis Greger Construcizon
Nilles Builders
Protective Nome Covering
Woods Canstruction
D.S. Trudeau Construction Company
Olsen Fire Pratection, Inc.
Heatinq and Air Canditioning License:
Parsons Hardware
Fred Vogt.and Company
PiasteringJStucco License:
Charies Denn Drywali and Stucco
.,3 .
'' i I I t H N
���1 �
' � �
�j I '
I
___ f�069V�C � I
/�/jj� � �_�� �-_ \)
(/" ' . 1 '-'_
I H�sw � Falco� Hei¢rta .----------i--- �---
�, -L--� --�
, �
, �
. �. .,
I �y� I '
�_" 1"� 1 �'_
' St. Paui
, , . � ,.o
�. „
-- �-�. � � CBD g� Pw
, ,
:
� �inneapolis .
, ,........ ,�
� CBD '�°�
g , ,-a.
l�� M
= W��m 1w�.
_ � �
1 �
' � � �I` � .
I ��
1
'� �� ` i ' t
� � � � � � + `f �.
� --- � ' �n � ' - � �
� � � �!
L _� ' ' •� 1 \
� 62 � � _ �
� p nt ,.�,�., Wes� S�. Pa� ; �
_
, ,,...... �. _
.�
( � � L� n t 1M 110 __ __ _
' �../ rJ � . \ ` -�� �
8 I � _ � � �
FiiChf�61d ��� . � �• - �,;�
� Inter �l���I ` l 3u+Frh � •
I Airp ' rt `�° �-�
_,
� — --- I-494 � � � I - �,
�i �� �� o � � S ut � as Area ;
=� �� .....a.�._ �o...�
`� ' finer cfove HaKr
�y �
j�j .� i » ouua. w I
fJ t
��, �.7 S
�-,5W �� ; - Ee�� s
�� , � h�, ,� �;
�-� � � z ._ .
�� 8
� j.:� .:�- � � `�
��� `
�' i _ p _ ,
��/ `
,1� . . � � ��..
,`
.
, .
, , �_;� .,.
� ---------- �'=� �--
�-------- -- ------- ---__
�,�� �
�� � Figure 1
Southeast Area Location
�_._ -- -----.'-_ .=�.�.f�-.=_� _ � _ _.. __ ---------- 'i�'-----'� —r_����_ -_ -=__ _.���__-_�•i ��-� �i'
� a� -'�=�_= _-_,,- -__-_ = _� = ��-ty�_._-
_ - - -- .�._ -_ _ , , , i.�= _ e� i - �—._:_ — - _� .-- - - -_
� i' j ''�, �� , �� � ' � � t� �, : ... ' -°� .
,s. � — . - ,� _ , ;
�j , MENDAKOT• GMf COlXtSE B CM1NiNY C�VB f
� � . ' ��'=� � \.
. `� � �� ��. .�� � : iT , ==�� ��_ ' (PPiWTE) �1 i �� � ; �, Mendota Heights =i=�� -
.� . . % Y - _ i: �� ,4 , � � i. , � ; ,
;� , : �. : i ►.;' � � > -e.._� o.
� '' _• ;` �''_ _ - 'y ___ _ _E�. � , -' `�_, Southeast Area �j
� ' . � ' � • '' /o-' ` . � 1 � i � . �
� � I e�� � �l ■ OviK� ,\ � �. _
�. . : ;�. �� , � E_ : _=� :._ . .:---- ---i :;. : , �
„� �- ,-�(--�� . II -{• -.: .,, !,;' r�= a � �
\ ., � , ,, - - -_ _..��_' •,•�; � I •� � Figure 2
� ; � \.� `.. �`` � 1 �- -- ; ;-' -� -= �1 II ' �- - � � � I, Southeast Area �
;�Jp �c . 'r__:- �' -= =- .r t .i,� �, \ .Y
� . � -�� �� �I4 - l; �� =�`� ��: �'- � � �� Boundar N�.,� : �,� .
_� �L.�aR���„o� \ ��. �,,_ �- ��_� � 4 �_____ � . � - f y � � --. -
` ` ;" . ' . -, � �' , � _ _ ..,.- ' �'i-: ' � � ' o ��oo
J , iU• �� �-=---
_ _ ' ...'�,+ . '� ... . *..._. �— ` I • � _ � �
=—' � - - . - ---c�— - ... ... ^ _ . � %' � ._: Q.,. ,L �� •� : _
r— . � .:. :: • --- - .f:
= - � . �• . _ _ i ' `=r ^��'T' � � Z� .�a ' � , ...�a.. � � ` ,, I � �ii': , � ` I `. ' � ` • .
- :.1 �_ ' �� a�•; �`i.: _-_= - � V• �•� " , � '�i r..K \ il ' � � 1 �` �'� --� �-i \� � � ` ,
_ CC�E7LpY '•\ ,,\ .I..I1.� � ._l�_I � •�� - � r �• ' � ``�� /�.�'°t� `� �:��+" �L�`y� � ..
�� •ao+"++[[l' k \`� ' � ��.���.)'��`l ��
� � \ ��..� �� "?�-' ' ' ' _"_ _ ' c�_ _ ___ •`• • \ _- �+ `� � �I `�� �lt� i � `
�;- F: � J • ' 1�;' --'-�-;—'— �.`.�• �' .r r =--. , � � ; �; �.
!r � , _ � �! ' ; � ; � �: ��-- . . ;: • �-� v `�%'�'; =�' �'''=:���;"" �;f� u�.
� �, `� ✓.--a �- i _ N_ , L.oaAii � I �-_ I F= - '7.�' • r�. �-.�'•. � `�� ���f .
�' .�' � p � ��. �' 1 ���e i . � _ _ _ - •t�• � � � , .ni' ` C - �: _�va ; � �� `���`��,.a?•i�\ � .
*� "� '� ��I � I�l �/T"�i �- = - � �.1. � � h�^�� ,',• � / � �� n i ��`� �� � �``��� ,
�-� � /�- ; �I; ' _ � _ - _ _ /� � 4, ''�`�v".. _ n i �- �� 1 �� .
� �^ � ol �_ f • - ---' - :- �E,,., � � � 1� •. � ii __. i, - . '� j�' `l i .yS,
`�� • -�f' ,� I - _ -. 1'�- _ _ . i � : - � ' � sv . � ` i ��
� ' ''` �`} � 7 ° I%___- _- s— -- � ;-� �--� - __m ,� �, (-.1H
•• 1,--_•=,!'+ :, :;Ir �_. /s�—�� _ �.��s ___� - _ - � I' ., •� -,".. _-= ��;��_ _ ; __\ •
.� Iwjl 1;== _ - _ yY_--= rr-� i •,� / •'°� 1 Y� ' �� �;
f � '� � Y��� __ _ _ 0 G _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - � , _- ' �� �`' ; _ C � j��•R�c`---� i-�t"r� :� :. �`'0a ,
i� �I - _ �1�- � "_ _ _ - / • � � . � f . �.`a � F�`�'-,� i r �� � r � �
I/ � �hi = - --- --�� _ - - •i� �� �: �� - �T • /`� �` r� �� � ;r_ _w.� � �--�� J -
.� ,,1=- - l�- � � �� _ _ ' i � �) t•i �X � � I. -T. .. .. ��- 1 i..a_� � �--� �O-•` ��� .
l � i � "-`dr� _ _ _ �•' � _ _ � ( � I S - �,v ,� � � � •. • � ' i. ' =i :. \ i' � � . � `- � a_o_� ������ •
--- - T=: �?- t r-"t � I^ - __ �� __ � � . - il . _ _ � � � -`� _ �+--�c;� -'-'-- _
i �- = r a - � - / �� 1 ... 1 �;� � �sv'l� ii� \ � � ^ �7-• �- ii
� 13 � �=�a�i�:,:i �, ` i=�; �..._ • �- (; � ' ii h':..�.� . -��-;� . �� �/l '�� �i`�� i ".j.'C
� i ..` u \''• 1 7� { [j�] /��
I ` � � • ♦ aG. � /�,ps..� i ' �' = j� 1 ��� � ^� / _/` � � C��,� \ \'` (��./'��^ 1�� ��`�Ca� ��i� \ W ' _
.!' �� 1 -- � �� 'i ` � ��.�, t <i p^. ` ' \ ' -. �� --� �v
�:1 ' ' �' ,..��, �.a� � _ �i -' K ` � � ',3' > .f.� q. '^\ � � ` ` - • '' �: -�% �i -� �. � � i--�•� �` �,s� .�` �,(�;
- ��;� � � � � -,ay: �, �,- ,�`��� _,�."'�� �; �`',;' �y. ;i; - Exception: ��� �-�� `� `�' ;s. • �•
: ��---� � ' / ( !,� I.;,� '�' � I �'�'r' ''� `� �^, ' ^'� � ;•'` " 1 _ � ,��` 'r (Not in Southeast Area) � ' -- �� � •
\ � _ `•----� � % I, ,I , _..�:i, ; �:�.- -, - , $ :y `��., " : ;- i ; ;
.•� `•-� �-----:� `' � ;, , :� �' � ;,� ;+ + .: �;�' ' ! - _. ;:�,;; Portions of Haselberger Addftion ', � -:_ - -` % � % • �
� ,\< • . �'. 1_�;"• ��� � �l�t��l� �O @I h ;i� ��� � � ' -• � and Simek Rearrangement `. �� - c;='•-� " � � ,. - •- -
,� \�-' '�1 � ,��; "
� c�?,� - - � ( ,pa
\\� �' �. f � �` �� ni� ' i ���--y� •_ �, � •::
\ � � �„ � � �\ � , i � (•� � � �' i'S'\^7�i� ` ``` � I� ,b , •,� �� fi'���s1J: %'�i- ,.�.J' ��• �'d,' ' `. r� � ��� • �Y�I�I.�i` .a : �
\ • � /����,cl �� � �' t.'"�','"'� ;. ;��' .� ��V - ; ' (� ` !r I � � � r ��',-_-- � ` _ ```.�E'�Oi'�r•_A# �te �(1'1Ft� �' =- _
/��� ;,� �'\ , i � �� `� i ��� �O� �``�- � �� �`_'`--=y�� � ; ��i� `���, `\ � � � '
. ` �, � � ; �,�i - + ��' ��1+ ,%s7`� `r �_ - � � /� � •1 `_ !}_ \ 1 � � � . �M � �
[ "o � � � _� I � '`` � �<'-�-�-r i .
-\� � •/ `\ \ / �� ,L, � � � _ - ��'�'\`\ /'♦ : / � �^` / �, � ` J / � 1
� � � —_ � � �_ �\
\ �,�•��� _ �-1 _ _ ' _ _ - -_ ' �- " ' -7��]f.Tye� !1 a T LTi�� x.l_ �1� _--- , . "
\�l i 1`� � �,- �'_. �_� =JJ " �- CV V ���i VI ��� '__' _� ��.-� � � /� ; �`
.- "__ .\� t- •���'_�� _ � ■� �1�7�■ 1�}�t _ _ _- - "
__ .�j.,�_�r�. � `.:._ ,:\ �/.1 , . . �� �' �i�./' �� . _ .. � �.a " _ .�1� !c^ `l ._ I , .
_ . ..� -" � ♦ �� ' I �I�� � � /i�� �;f "_✓� . ' . . . . .. .. _. •;C�'.�.�: . ;��/. - . . '�.' . .�`_"�'�
f�ll �
-!- � ^'_� ,� _=.-�=z�= •= s - - -_- ��= . - - - _ � `�-� =_° ""___ ' _' -__��� : � •--' � _ � �--�_.— _,��i— -. i i i fi: _:
--, -1�-// � I q-�- _-� _ � _� - --, '_ '. � � __� �—___, �— '
� `g� . ,�— - � •I- ' p`/\/` /� .� . � � I i ,+j'� �; —� ,� _
� ' S ' ' I . \_�1 MEND<KOTA GO�i' COURSE B COI�NiRY ClVO ,�
, �� 1 - -_ � ;� � (PRIV�TE) I� .� � ; �, Mendota Heights -i=�� -
, , � - :;; -- = 1'r� �'_ 'a i � ?%� � � Southeast Area � °�
. '-,: -- . �; � _ _ ,.- � �= a • _ •�, � -
� `�--�---- --- •�� '� ,-- '� - + --- � - ' °'� - ' - - -..
�� h� - __':v ;-- - -- .r•...-: l�
� - ' — --� : , _ : : . ..ti-_ �ti .. -� � � � Figure 3
. \, ---_-��-�� , �.� - .i�:.: _; _ _ � �; _ , , �
`�. �� C\ 1 •!• �,�/ _ - 1 'I . J._�• 1 ' •\ � N
, ��. \� L.-' __ �: _ �� —>=_., I :�:! ;, � �, Southeast Area ��
' . � ; � - / `� = _�,, �' �: :,'�� _ � `� ; Land Use Plan Norih _ I �
,� eR� CI�OM \ I ��� gr i � /� '
4ttu i .� \.. �1 _ �-_ _ � � 1 � '�^__
�: - j . � _ -=_ > ��. � Q ~ C00 8W I •
I� r .V \ ' E-=__ - < I
' �r 1�'�� (r \\� J' � �= _ .,... j. S : .L -, ' `,. :���_�, , `
1 . ... . ,;r ... ... �_ '"" . --�- -. . �-� , • - .�
� ..�.....
~� --'T�- - ;/ ' � Ti ��- �`� - •:; ' � "F; , �..a.� � � � _ i �;�' � ,�� ��`,I .A'—
- - ,\\� ,, `.�'. ��E` �n =-_- • - � u. - •�� 'i;,�• �..e \� �r''��i ��`� ;�__�`i_�- ���y.��
� �: _' . . �
I , k � j `�� � - �_ � . _ ._ �\ \ ,'' y�,l� I � I ` ` ` ��_ _ }
� C C � CT C n♦ , � � �t F-� - al l � �=M• _ .i =, \ \ `♦ / 4'° [ �`. A�% � �� .F��
: . ,�- •�-.�L:1i: �-�_ _-1`L� ��_ -t � �, , ,,, � '��,.._�., y�, --� -�
. ;_- ,� ».o�. .�«- . -- • . ; „�,. �, ,�
� ` .- - -- - - ��E-_ - .� ' � _ "-ti� • � - '� i ��-, r.�i �;.x; , ,��.
1'`, i j�� .. . i I3 I �i - - _.�, -� - -)�- - --- ��'' • �T ='� i�� �` ` � �`�'-� �.+ � �� V
� , i � t � .��•�:j; t 7` 'i ����_ - I � 1
,'•,\ ';� � __ / - - qI . �;, r ; � � _ . . �� - .' • ��' f - -� ,-�. � �'� % �---; i� r'" .
� �i� l c=� - N - ^� J.� ,p �0��ii i i I - —�_ _ - _ � j ' : : i •;:,�,'• • ` y �". �� � I ( �� ���..�'i � � r � '
� I• ,�/ .aa. r _ - - - _ -.
„ � lJ i �- %�tr •�• , �� �1�� . .�� � ���=y --= � 1�,� ,i �� �^�:����
°C <• �YY I { '• - _ -- :,i ���� �
`y 'i'� J � "I � �31 IJ._� ' _ _ /I %�--j -�-�" • _ n i -i '_i �\` �� � ��� ,
� f( -' -='��f_ _ _ _ � �• .i. . . � ii _ �'"��' �i�P` /
/� ` "'_ J��;1 Iv '/'/ • _� ' ' =r "� ' � 1 �' ;'w •' i S�l°�r ' '���'�' t�� ;.1�`�` '�y+•
, -1 �� v ' - - ,- � - V��' �� --Lp � � ��
- _��_�� � i' ry � ��__ = z - - _ - - - — - - - -- �, I - �e . -� �'= ~ �im;tsr ' � '�i�
' � � I :h� � = -- _ � -s = �--- -- _ ,.. � - • ' . ' _ , 2�-. � � _ --
• } - , �� � � _ _ _ —� _�, ._ �' _ � � � �'� �. _ - � � � � � .;'* \ � .
� II I - -. 0 G, / . "°.� ,� .• ��` � �t � _ � �-�,...'�;:,;; „ � ..
` �= — -.� � � - - - : � ' � • � �f � � � , « �� ; ,
' / I I 1 I y _ _ c � _ " ' ^ l • 'r v'• /�� �^�'r' ) � '*'° � % � .__ ` :``�_ � ��
_ .,-L�., �� ; _= _ - � - _ - . , . , � � , - , �-- ; «. , : --_ �_�:�
, .� ,- ,, - � -, .. ���:;:�:�
� � _ = — _ =T•��: __ ;� ; / r � ; � ' � � .. ,- 1�'-
--- -�:�: � _ ' -_� _-_ - '- _ , —� ' * - ._ _ . - ___ -:- . ����� _.._
� � � .e �.1/� � , , �, • .
j� -� = - � �.-�I `�� �, ; �..1 / .��++�T' •� � � /��-� �1 � `I �-��{� � ��� '��'N n �7
`�j �� _�•-_ �� �4; � 1 � //� � � . d • �� �� / .�� u � \'' i�^ �.` ���_� _ !�\� N�•- _j�
� � �� ' _ n ' � � � , iY ..i �l_ 'Y� !D'�� --� � • `, i � �'/ ``'�� �e-� _♦ �r-i Qq,� � ' _
/� ��� -/ �-/p��. `•�' ` �� � `w\r' �1rt�' I �n _ � ♦i ��•,. � _ '__�``\ " t L ..
�� i ' ;' `; '3'� "f'�"� -�� r , � y�. q � I � --'- �g„' ' _��` �--1� ' �'
_� , r\ V'1`` 1` .�,.7 � � � ♦ j �!i �.. � ' �� �iflr_
a"st*� �' / I , • ' �� ' _ � � C- �' 1 i'f'� �O' i� �f � 1 - •
� ,�o` y1 i �''tii- v� �'°i i _ rT� �` i L�` 1°� � S� 's a.: ��. ��.r^� � �� i
� , �, �. � ._.. - , � �� , . � , ,,s,�,���f� . ., � .-i= �^ , ,
\ � r. �� `: .`� ; h� � � � � I r 1 �� i �.. % ! 1 1/ I � '` �� :@ ` �. 1 �' '`=_ '� \ / �
� 1 � 'I y7 /• �� -. � �i�; / _ 1 .9J� � I " ' /
��•. . —� 1 � � � '� ;�_=f,,;� ;,�, .,�i �, � , . :�.�-� �- , , xt � �►�c� ' je� ; " �
-- � � � . - ' � _ - - - ' � -� �r� rr� � „ �? , " . .
\ \ � ` � ' �.-. �' '� �± Ot8 R �� `\' a � ���' ' m. F
� '�I;�! • � ;, ;.r, � ,- I - -�,������,�� ��. � ' g � , � �4�.;' "�' �
/ � �:� `� � �` i� � � � i � „/�. �� `(�i � i����yai I�� �. .e. - � r i i � �'
_,i'(� `. \\ 1`\ '/ .. u p, �, , � � . � v , i d l ,, j J I,� -%, j = ;.;-L%`C"1 . . � � � r �`-Sn 1 �t . _ �' ,�•
\ .sl �;iu \ � i �.y�.,.�( � I l-c �a��o� jL � __ ,`• / , ^ ��/� = ,_. ��`���'�,' �"l � ♦ ����j .� J
� ', / � ,� � _ ��'�:� � � `�'�`��'� �,��,/���C� �:`� 4� :;i I� _� i � � i_ ' ` _ i � � .- - -_ _�r ��� -'�_`.;; `��. � • _
�/ • � ��` `�, � `\ i i �,�i' ��r`�.,' ��,j` {li \, ��"•`. �r =--,�'(� � �; �lfllt§� C:FP.� �} `�� S`��%'�^��,rjy 1:
� _ ��,. , I.��� _ ., �� .� � ; - r,. _ �;;, ;,_ ;. ��,, ���:.�.
� - � ��-��� -!- __ '__'_' '__--- _' � _ � R'T_Ld 9 7_[ 7'.E� IG�ii � ''t'� � ,, / 1`� � �71�
yy /j��'%'- - _` .--- -.—��_ -.- -_�---_' "'-- - , _.'-' - - t - ��- __ ----' � --- -� A➢' � •
_.- -lJ �1 ���� � --�j/—' ' -"� _ _"' "'_ __ ___ _ >� - - _.krm�-roi __-- - ___ ' ...._' `` -'
//
,#.r _v
- �`�- i ;\ � .� � � � �. � / . . _ . . . . . -� ' 1 . .
_ _'"'.- � � - � . ' 'I � �� � � i��� d �! / • ' . • ' ' .�� �?,�✓ . . : . . � zj, : ,_
. . . -. • ' �� • �
,'
a
596-0
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING O�' THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MENDUTA HEI(3HTS, MINNESOTA
HELD: NOVEMBER 5, 1985
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a reyular me�tin�
of the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota
County, Minnesota, was duly called and held at the City Hall in
said City on the 5th day of November, 1985, at 7:30 P.M. for
the purpose of authorizing the issuance of and awarding the
sale of $260,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates of
1985 of the City.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESO'LUTION PROVIDING FOR THE
ISSUANCE AND SALE OF
$ 260 , 000 GENERAL OBLIGATIOLJ EQUIPMEL�TT
CERTIFICATES OF 1985
WHEREAS:
A. The City Council has heretofore determined that
it is necessary and expedient to issue $260,OU0 General
Obligation Equipment Certificates of 1985, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.301, to finance the acquisition
of police, fire and street construction equipment for the City
(hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Equipment");
B. The amount of the certificates to be issued
($260,000) does not exceed one percent (1.00�) of the assessed
valuation of the City;
,
a
C. Na other obligations have been issued to defray
the expense of the purchase of the Equipment; and
D. No other obligata.ons have been sald pursuant to a
private sale within the last three (3) calendar months of the
date hereof which when cambined with this issue waula exceed
the $300,000 limitation on negatiated sales as required by
Mi.nnesota S�.atutes, Section 475 .6Q, Subdi.vi.si.on 2( 2). �
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City
of Mendota Heights, Minnesata, as follaws:
1. The offer af { the
"Purchaser") to purchase $260,000 General Obligatian Equipment
Certificates of 1985 of the City {hereinafter referred ta as
the "Certificates" or individually as "Certificate"), in
accordance with the terms and at the rates of interest .d. ,�,�_
hereina£ter set forth, and to pay therefor the sum of ...
$ plus interest accrued to settlement is hereby
accepted.
2. The Certificates shall be dated December l, 1985,
as the date of original issue and shall be issued �ortlzwith as
fully registered bonds. The Certificates shall be numbered
from R-1 upward in the denamination of $5,q00 each or a.n any
integra2 multiple thereof. The Certificates shall mature,
witlzout opta.on of prepayment, an December 1 in the years and
amounts as .�ollows:
1986 $ 30,000
1987 $ 40,000
19$8 $ 90,000
1989-1.990 $ 50, 000
3. The Certificates shall provide funds for the
acquisition of the Equipment far the City. The totai cost of
the Eguipment, which shall include all costs enumerated in
Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65, is estimated ta be at least
equal to the amount of the Certificates herein authorized.
-�
4. The Certificates sha].l bear interest payable semi-
annually an June 1 and December 1 of each year canunencing
June 1, 1986 at the respective rates per annum set forth
opposite the maturi�.y years as follows; .
Maturity Years Interest Rates
5. , in ,
Minnesota is appointed to act as certificate registrar and
transfer agent (the "Certificate Registrar") and shall do so
unless and until a successor Certificat� Registrar is duly
appointed, all pursuant to any contract the City and
Certa.ficate Registrar sha13 exeeute which is consistent
herewith. The Certificate Registrar shall alsa serve as paying
agent unless and until a suecessor paying agent is duly
appointed. Principal and interest on the Certificates shall be
paid to the registered holders (or recard holder� af the
Certificates in the manner set for�h in the form o� Certificate
and paragraph 1.1 of this resolu�.ion. ,
6. The Certi£icates to be issued hereunder, together
with the Certificate Registrar'� Certi�icate af Authentication,
the form of Assignment and the registration in�ormation thereon
shall. be in substantially the following farm:
K3
��•-
7. The Certificates shall be executed on behalf of
the City by the signatures of its Mayor and City Clerx and be
sealed with the seal of the City; provided, however, that the
seal of the City may be a printed facsimile; provided further
that both of such signatures may be printed facsimiles and the
corporate seal may be omitted on the Certificates as permitted
by law. In the event of disability or resignation or other
absence of either such officer, the Certificates may be signed
by the manual or facsimile signature of that officer who may
act on behalf of such absent or disabled officer. In case
either such officer whose signature or facsimile of whose
signature shall appear on the Certificates shall cease to be
such officer before the delivery of the Certificates, such
signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and
sufficient for all purposes, the�same as if he or she had
remained in office until delivery.
=Y.>. 8. No Certificate shall be valid or obligatory for
:��`� any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under
this resolution unless and until a Certificate of
Authentication on such Certificate, substantially in the�form
hereinabove set forth, shall have been duly executed by an
authorized representative of the Certificate Registrar.
Certificates of Authentication on different Certificates need
not be signed by the same person. The Certificate Registrar
shall authenticate the signatures of officers of the City on
each Certificate by execution of the Certificate of
Authentication on the Certificate and by inserting as the date
;�, of registration in the space provided the date on which the
Certificate is authenticated, except that for purposes of
delivering the original Certificates to the Purchaser, the
Certificate Registrar shall insert as a date of registration
. the date of original issue, which date is December 1, 1985.
The executed Certificate of Authentication on each Certificate
-_ shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and
delivered under this resolution.
9. The City will cause to be kept at the principal
office of the Certificate Registrar a certificate register in
which, subject to such reasonable regulations as the
Certificate Registrar may prescribe, the Certificate Registrar
shall provide for the registration of Certificates and the
registration of transfers of Certificates entitled to be
registered or transferred as herein provided.
10
4'!�
':i
Upon surrender for transfer of any Certificate at the
principal office of the Certificate Registrar, the City shall
execute �(if necessary), and the Certificate Registrar shall
authenticate, insert the date of registration (as provided in
paragraph 8) and deliver, in the name of the designated
transferee or transferees, one or more new Certificates of any
authorized denomination or denominations of a like aggregate
principal amount, having the same stated maturity and interest
rate, as requested by the transferor; provided, however, that
no certificate may be registered in blank or in the name of
"bearer" or similar designation.
At the option of the holder, Certificates may be
exchanged for Certificates of any authorized denomination or
denominations of a like aggregate principal amount and stated
maturity, upon surrender of the Certificates to be exchanged at
the principal office of the Certificate Registrar. Whenever
any Bonds are so surrendered for exchange, the City shall
execute (if necessary), and the Certificate Registrar shall
authenticate, insert the date of registration of, and deliver
the Certificates which the holder making the exchange is,
entitled to receive.
All Certificates surrendered upon any exchange or
transfer provided for in this resolution shall be promptly
cancelled by the Certificate Registrar and thereafter disposed
of as directed by the City.
All Certificates delivered i
�=� transfer of Certificates shall be valid
the City evidencing the same debt, and
benefits under this resolution, as the
for such exchange or transfer.
n exchange for or upon
general obligations of
entitled to the same
Certificates surrendered
.�
Every Certificate presented or surrendered for �w�
tra°nsfer or exchange shall be duly endorsed or be accompanied
by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to
the Certificate Registrar, duly executed by the holder thereof
or his attorney duly authorized in writing.
The Certificate Registrar may require payment of'a�
sum sufficient to cover any tax or other yovernmental charye
payable in connection with the transfer or exchange of any
Certificate.
11
Transfers shall also be subject to reasonable regula-
tions of the City contained in any agreement with the
Certificate Registrar, including regulations which permit the
Certificate Registrar to close its transfer books between
record dates and payment dates.
10. Each Certificate delivered u�on transfer of or in
exchange for or in lieu of any other Certificate shall carry
all the rights to interest accrued and unpaid, and to accrue,
which were carried by such other Certificate.
11. Interest on any Certificate shall be paid on each
interest payment date by check or draft mailed to the person in
whose name the Certificate is registered (the "Holder") on the
. registration books of the City maintained by the Certificate
- Registrar and at the address appearing thereon at the close of
business on the fifteenth day of the calendar month next
;�, preceding such interest payment date (the "Regular Record
. Date"). Any such interest not so timely paid shall cease to be
payable to the person who is the Holder thereof as of the
Regular Record Date, and shall be payable to the person who is
the Holder thereof at the close of business on a date (the .
"Special Record Date") fixed by the Certificate Registrar
whenever money becomes available for payment of the defaulted
interest. Notice of the Special Record Date shall be given by
the Certificate Registrar to the Holders not less than 10 days
prior to the Special Record Date.
,,,s. 12. The City and the Certificate Registrar may treat
the person in whose name any Certificate is registered as the
. owner of such Certificate for the purpose of receiving payment
of principal of and premium, if any, and interest (subject to
the payment provisions in paragraph 11 above) on, such
;�;:; Certificate and for all other purposes whatsoever whether or
. not such Certificate shall be overdue, and neither the City nor
� the Certificate Registrar shall be affected by notice to the
contrary.
13. The Certificates when so prepared and executed
shall be delivered by the City Treasurer to the Purchaser upon
receipt of the purchase price, and the Purchaser shall not be
obliged to see to the proper application thereof.
12
14. There is hereby created a special fund ta be
designated '"General Obligation Equipment Certificates of i985
Fund"' (the "Fund'") �o be held and administered by tihe City
Treasurer separate and apart f�om a11 ather funds a� the Gity.
The Fund shall be maintained in the manner herein specified
until aIl of the Certificates herein autharized and the
interes�. thereon have been ful].y paid. There shall be
maintained in the Fund two separate accounts ta be designatea
the "Capital Accoun�" and t�he "Debt Service Account",
respectively. The proceeds af the sale of the Certificates
herein authorized, less any accrued interest received therean,
and less capitalized interest in the amount of �
(together with interest earnings thereon and subject to such
other adjustments a� are appropriate to pravide su�ficient
funds ta pay interest due on the Certi�icates on ar be£are
Decmeber 1, 1986), �hall be credited to the Capital Account,
from which there shall be paid all casts and expenses of,,,�=,,<<
acquiring the Equipment, including the cost of any purchase
contracts heretafore entered into and all other costs incurred
and to be incurred of the kind authorized in Ma.nnesota
Statutes, Sectian 475.65; and the moneys in said account shall
be used far na other purpase except as otherwise pravided by
law; provided that the Certificate proceeds may also be used to
the extent necessary to pay interest on the Certificates due
prior to the anticipated date of connmencement of t.he collectian
of taxes herein levied. There is hereby pledged and there
shall be credited ta the Debt Service Account (a) all accruec�
interest and received upon delivery of the Certificates; (b)
capitalized interest in the amaunt af $ {tagether with
interest earnings thereon and subject to such ather adjustments
as are appropriate to pravide sufficient funds ta pay interest
due on the Certa.ficates on or before December l, 1986); (c) any
collections of all �axes herein levied far the payment af the
Certificates and�interest thereon; (d) all funds remaining-in
the Cap%tal Account after acquisition of the Equi�ment and�
payment of the costs thereot; and (e} a1.1 investment earnings
an �unds held in the Debt Service Account. The Debt Service
Accaunt herein created sha11 be used soieiy to pay,the
principal and interest and any premiums for redemption of the
Certificates issued hereunder and any other general obligation
cer�ificates of the City herea£ter issued by the City and made
payable from said account as provided by law. Any sums fram•
time to time held in the Debt Service Account in excess of
amounts which under the applicable federal arbitrage
regulata.ons may be invested without reyard as to ya.eid shall
not be invested at a yield in excess of the applicable yield
13
• t .,
restrictions imposed by said arbitrage regulations on such
investments after taking into account any applicable "temporary
periods" made available under the federal arbitrage
regulations. In addition, money in the Account shall not be
invested in obligations or deposits issued by,,guaranteed by or
insured by the United States or any agency or instrumentality
thereof if and to the extent that such investment would cause
the Certificates to be "federally guaranteed" within the
meaning of Section 103(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954,
as amended.
15. To provide moneys for payment of the principal
and interest on the Certificates there is hereby levied upon
all of the taxable property in the City a direct annual ad
valorem tax which shall be spread upon the tax rolls and
. collected with and as part of other general property taxes in
the City for the years and in the amounts as follows:
�`:;
• Year of Tax Year of Tax
Levy Collection Amount ,
1985 1986 $30,000
1986 1987
1987 1988
1988 1989
The tax levies are such that if collected in full
they, together with estimated collections of other revenues
•:y herein pledged for the payment of the Certificates, will
produce at least five percent in excess of the amount needed to
meet when due the principal and interest payments on the
Certificates. The tax levies shall be irrepealable so long as
any of the Certificates are outstanding and unpaid, provided
F;;• that the City reserves the right and power to reduce the levies
in the manner and to the extent permitted by Minnesota
Statutes, Section 475.61(3).
For the prompt and full payment of the principal and
interest on the Certificates, as the same respectively become
due, the full faith, credit and taxing powers of the City shall
be and are hereby irrevocably pledged. If the balance in the
Debt Service Account is ever insufficient to pay all principal
and interest then due on the Certificates payable therefrom,
the deficiency shall be proinptly paid out of any other funds of
the City which are available for such purpose, and such other
funds may be reimbursed with or without interest from the Debt
Service Account when a sufficient balance is available therein.
14
16. The Clerk is hereby di.rected to �ile a certified
capy of this resalution with the County Aud.itor of Dakota
County, Minnesota, toge�her with such other information as he
shall require,� and to obtain .f.ram the Auditor his certa.ficate
that the Certificates have been entered in the Auditor's
Certificate Register, and that the tax levy required by law has
been made.
17. The o�ficers of the City are hereby authorized
and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser o£ the
Bonds, and to the attorneys approving t�he legality of the
issuance thereo�, certified copies af all paroceedings and
recards af the City relating to the Certificates and to the
financiai candi�.ion and affairs of the City, and such other
affidavits, certificates and information as are required ta
shaw the facts relating to the legality and marketability,af-�t
the Certificates as the same appear frorn the boaks and records
under their custody and cantrol ar as otherwise known to them,
and all such certified copies, certificates and af�idavits, in-
cluding any heretafore furnished, shall be deemed represen-
tatians of the Ca.ty as to the facts reci.ted therein. �
The motion for the adoptian of the faregaing
resolution was duly seconded by member and
upon vote being taken therean, the �ollawing voted in favar
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupan said resolution was declared duly passed�,
and adopted. �}
-,.:.
�1
15
v � .
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CO[Jt�TTY OF DAKOTA
CITY OF MENDOTR HEIGHTS
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and
acting Clerk of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing
extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my
office, and that the same is a full, true and complete
transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of
said City, duly called and held on the date therein indicated,
insofar as such minutes relate to authorizing the issuance of
and awarding the sale of $260,000 General Obligation Equipment
Certificates of 1985 of said City.
WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this
�
day of , 1985.
(SEAL)
�i
16
Clerk
�
�
�
.
Page No. 2387
November 5, 1985
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OE MINNESOTA
Minutea of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, November 5, 1985
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City
Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall,
750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minneaota.
Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The followin
membera were present: Mayor Lockwood, Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins,
Hartmann and Witt.
INTRODUCTIONS
SOUTHEAST AREA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENTS
Mayor Lockwood introduced City Planner Howard Dahlgre
to the audience.
Mayor Lockwood read action taken at the October 15th
meeting relating to comprehenaive plan amendments and
development of the southeast area of the City. The
Council acknowledged and discuased a memo from Planne
Dahlgren proposing plan amendment languege and a memo
from the City Adminiatrator regarding southeast area
plan amendmenta.
Councilmember Cummins suggested that the supporting
guidelinea aection o£ the Goals atatement be expanded
so that item number one be renumbered number 2 and
that a new number one be inserted to atate that no
particular development pro�ect ahall exceed 150 unita
He felt that such language would not preclude one
developer who propoaea a 150-unit pro�ect from
bringing in other pro,7ect proposals of the same size.
He atated that if thia approach were taken he could
envision aeveral development pro�ecta of 150 units
being constructed over the next five yeara: the City
would not be facing two pro�ecta which would develop
the entire area in one year.
City Attorney Hart concurred but stated that the
standard which will guide the Council is whether the
� comprehensive plan limitations are rensonably and
rationally related to the public safety, health and
welfare. He stated that he is not sure the concerna
of Councilmember Cummins cannot be addressed through
the design process and felt that specific guidelines
as auggeated should not be aet forth in the plan.
Councilmember Cummins stated he suggests the 150-unit
pro�ect maximum for aeveral reasona: Council would
then have the opportunity to control the orderly
development of the area end auch pro,7ect would be les�
P
C
0
Page No. 2388
November 5, 1985
likely to unduly tax the services the community must
provide than a 500-unit pro�ect developed at one time
Meyor Lockwood pointed out that the City always
requires developers agreements and has never lacked
control under those agreementa and felt thet aince
development can only occur through the PUD process
Cauncil will have all the control it needg.
After discussion, Mayor Lockwood moved to adopt the
wording regarding comprehenaive plan changes containe
in the City Planner's report dated October 23, 1985.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: O
Administrator Frazell asked for Council direction
relative to the portion of his memo regarding
commerciel area designation for the southeast corner
o£ Dodd Road and Mendota Neights Road. Councilmember
Witt atated that ahe concura with a statement by
Councilmember Cummins at a prior meeting, that
consideration of the designation can occur when a nee
occurs.
Councilmember Witt moved to refer the proposed Zc �g
Ordinance amendments contained in Planner Dahlgre,. s
October 23rd report to the Planning Commission.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: O
HOUSING BONDS - Mayor Lockwood reviewed Planner Dahlgren's October
MENDOTA HEIGHTS 11th memo and October 15th Council diacussiong
ASSOCIATES relative to the Mendota Heights Aasocietes CJames
Riley) applicationa for S40 million in houaing revenu
bonda and proposal for development of an apsrtment
pro�ec£ on the south aide o£ Mendota Heights Road.
He atated that Mr. Riley haa indicated that he is
willing to work with the City based on the compromise
auggested by two Councilmembers at the last meeting
and that he has met with Mr. Riley in the hope that e
compromiae can be reached. Mayor Lockwood informed
the Council that Mr. Riley has auggeated that he woul
be willing to build 150 units of apartment housing es
a£irst atage and wait to aee how acceptable the
pro�ect becomes to the City, with the understanding
that he could ultimately build 300 unita which would
be condominiumized in the future and based on S20
million in housing revenue bond financing. He
informed the audience that at a special meeting c
November 4th, Planner Dahlgren reviewed suggestec. _t
plana which he had prepared and which presented a mix
of atructure sizes: 2-75 unit atructurea, and four
structures contnining 32 units, 52 units, 20 units an
C
�
�.: .'r
Page No. 2389
November 5, 1985
46 units respectively. The units would be spread ove;
40.75 acres so that the denaity would be lesa than 8
units per acre, which would fall within the
guidelines. He felt that the proposal is a reasonabl�
compromise and that if the developer can build the
atructures under the City's rigid guidelines it would
be an acceptable pro�ect. '
Councilmember Witt stated that she sgrees with the
Mayor's efforts but pointed out that Councilmember
Cummins has raiaed questions which should be
addressed, citing in particular a letter from the
Metropolitan Council to the City Administrator which
states in part that an environmental assessment
workaheet should be completed by the City before it
mekea a final decision on the bonds.
Councilmember Cummins stated that he was going to
raiae a couple of legal iasues and noted that while
those iasuea could be referred ta the City Attorney
£or review and the financing conaidered a£ter his
review, he suggeated that the proposed bonding be
denied at this time based on the propoaed pro�ect and
on the basis that Council has �ust gone through an
arduous comprehenaive plan amendment with good ,
guidelines in place. He atated that the Riley
proposal still fails to conform to the comprehensive
plan to the extent that all of the buildinga exceed 2�
units in size. Councilmember Cummins pointed out tha�
while the conditional use permit process would be
available to the developer, he would be reluctant to
approve financing for a pro�ect thet is not consisten�
with the comprehensive plan. He suggested that the
developer can come back some day with a pro�ect in
keeping with the scale of the comprehensive plan.
Mayor Lockwood asked Attorney Tom Hart for his
comments regarding the Metropolitan Council letter.
Attorney Hart atated that his preliminary reaponse is
that there has been no comment from the Metropolitan
Council other than a finding of no inconaiatensy at
thia time: an EAW is required and will be required,
but he is unaure that the lack o£ EAW invalidates the
public hearing. Debra Strehlow, bond counsel for Mr.
Riley, stated that with regard to the EAW, the
requirement is that it must be £iniahed and
accomplished before the £inal bond approval and
pointed out that the Council is'considering ,7ust the
preliminary resolutions at thia time.
Mayor Lockwood stated that he believes the Council is
proceeding properly and that his only reason £or bein�
in favor of granting the £inancing ia aimply to enabl�
�
�
�
Page No. 2390
November 5, 1985
� the developer to produce a better quality constructio�
for the City. City Attorney Hart atated that i£ it 'i:
Council's desire to approve the preliminary £inancing
reaolutions, the reaolutions should be augmented to b�
very clear that the discretion of tfie Council ia abso
lute and unlimited.
Councilmember Blesener expressed support for Council-
member Cummina' statements, pointing out that Council
has taken great paina to amend the comprehensive plan
and that the amendments contain certain language whicl
the developer's proposal ia in con£lict with. She
stated that she believes the development can
eventually be worked out to be acceptable to the
Council but that she cannot aupport the requested
financing because of the conflicts with the pinn
�mendments. .
Councilmember Witt commented that while the points
brought out by Councilmember Bleaener are good, the
request before Council is only for preliminary
approval. She f,elt that Council adoption of the
preliminary resolutions, amended to reflect the City
Attorney'es comments on Council discretion, would
appropriate.
Councilmember Cummins stated that the attorneys have
not addreased his concern that the EAW be completed,
and pointed out thet statutes require that a
Metropolitan Council report be conside�ed at the
public hearing -the report was not given to Council
and he believes it was germain. He in£ormed Council
that Bernard Friel has mentioned to him• that he had
done research on bond isaues and has discovered a
legal point which could �eopardize the issuance of en
City bonds in the future. He felt that Council shoul
resolve the iasue now and that the developer can come
back with a proposal later that will comply with City
guidelines. �
Mr. Bernard Friel stated that section 462C.04 of Stat
Statute requires that if there is any material change
� in a pro�ect plac�d before the Metropolitan Council
that the matter must be resubmitted to the
Metropolitan Council and Minneaota Houaing Finance
Agency before it can be reheard by the Council. He
felt that a change from 590 unita to 300 unita is a
,material change which requirea new•public hearinga an
` stated that he has been in£ormed preliminarily by ''�e
Metropolitan Council that this doea constitute a
material change.
Mayor Lockwood pointed out that the changes which hav
0
�
Ayes: 2
Nays: 3 Blesener
Cummins
Hartmann
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Ayes: 4
Nays: O
CONSENT CALENDAR
�
;
Page No. 2391
November 5, 1985
been made are chnnges that the residents wanted.
City Attorney Hart stated that the relevant opinions
would be heard at bond closing, if that ever occura.
He informed the Council that he has asked the bond
counsel whether the reduction in units would be a
material change and they have expresaed the opinion
that it ia not a change which would require additional
hearings.
Mayor Lockwood moved preliminary approval of �20
million in housing revenue financing for Mendota
Heights Associates.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Councilmember Witt was excused from the meeting at
8:45 P.M.
Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of' the minutes
of the October 15th meeting.
Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion.
Mayor Lockwood asked that Item 4g, memo on Dodd Road
watermain assesament de£erment request, be removed
from the consent calendar.
Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the consent
calendar as submitted, exclusive of item 4g, and
recommended for approval as part of the regular
agenda, along with authorization for execution of all
necessary documents contained therein.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Acknowledgement of the minutes of the October 8th
Park and Recreation Commission meeting.
Acknowledgement of the minutes of the October 22nc
Planning Commission meeting.
Acknowledgement of the Code.Enforcement monthly
report for October.
Acknowledgement of a memo from the City Treasurer
regarding aewer rates.
Acknowledgement of a letter from Ms. Betty
Armstrong regarding aoutheaat area development.
,�:
C
�
Ayes: 4
Nays: O
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Page No. 2392
November S, 1985
£. Adoption o£ Resolution No. 85-84, "RESOLUTION
ACCEPTING WORK AND AFPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR
ANDERSEN/CURLEY SANITARY SEWERS AND WATER SERVICE�
CIMPROVEMENT NO. 85, PROJECT NO. 1)," authorizing
£inal payment of �1,240.00 to Orfei & Sons, Inc.
h. Approval of a request from the City Administrator
to�authorize subacriptions to City Council meetinc
agendas at an annual fee of 517.00.
i. Acknowledgement of a report of bids received for
the sale of Park Department Unit No. 501, a 1978
Chevrolet 3/4 ton pick-up truck, and authorizatior
to sell the unit to Mr. Jamea Ayatte for his high
bid of 53,050.00.
�. Acknowledgement of a letter from Cameron Kruse
expressing his intent to resign from the Planning
Commission at the end of his current term, along
with a memo on Commisaion term expirations.
k. Acknowledgement of a memo from the Police Chief
and approval of a waiver of the City's trappinct
ordinance to allow Mr. Thomas Heany to trap
beavers on his property at 1818 Valley Curve.
1.
m.
Approval of the list of claims dated November 5,
1985 and totalling 5132,254.50.
Approval of the list of contractor licenses,
granting licensea to:
Parsons Hsrdware
Developers Construction
Oreskovich Builders, Inc.
B.B.K. Construction, Inc.
Dennis Greger Construction
Nillea Buildera
Protective Home Covering
Wooda Conatruction
D.S. Trudeau Const. Co.
Olsen Fire Protection Inc.
Parsons Hardware
Fred Vogt and Company
Charles Denn Drywall/Stucco
Gas Piping L'icense
General Contractor Licen�E
G�neral Contractor Licens�
General Contractor Licena;
General Contractor Licenat
General Contractor Licene,
General Contractor Licens=.
General Contractor Licena,
General Contractor Licena:
General Contractor Licens�
Htg. & Air Cond. License
Htg. & Air Cond. License
Plastering/Stucco License
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Mr. Bernard Friel presented a new petition, signed by
an additional 250 reaidents, oppoaing the Mendota
Heights Associates proposed pro,7ect.
�
�
�
�
Page No. 2393
November 5, 1985
EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES Financial Advisor Shaughnessy diatributed and reviewe�
a tabulation of bida received for the sale of 5260,OOi
in Equipment Certificatea. He recommended that the
bid be awarded to the First National Bank of St. Paul
for its low bid of �57,950 and net interest rate of
6.981 :.
Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolution
No. 85-85, "RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND
SALE OF 5260,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT
CERTIFICATES OF 1985," awerding the bid to the First
National Bank of St. Paul.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Naya: O
HEALTH RESOURCES Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpose of
public hearing on an application from Health
Reaources, Inc. for preliminary approval of an
application from Health Reaources, Inc. for 5750,000
in induatrial revenue financing. The Council
acknowledged a memo from the City Adminiatrator
indicating that Health Resources has asked that
the matter be held over.
Mayor Lockwood asked for questions and comments from
the audience.
There being no
Cummins moved
December 3rd.
Councilmember
Ayes: 4
Nays: O
questions or comments, Councilmember
that the hearing be continued to
Blesener seconded the motion.
EASEMENT VACATION Administrator Frazell informed the Council that Mr.
Thomas Dolan, applicant for vacation of an easement i;
the Brompton Courts Addition, cannot be present until
later in the meeting and has requested that the
hearing be delayed until his arrival.
Msyor Lockwood asked for questions and comments from
the audience. There being no questiong or comments,
the matter was tabled.
TANDEM DEVELOPMENT, Mr. Dick Putnam, representing Tandem Development, was
COPPERFIELD ADDITION present to review propoaed changes in the preliminary
plat for the Copperfield Addition which were the
reault o£ Council recommendationa and conversationa
with Dodge Nature Center representatives. He
reviewed the chnnges which were deacribed in his
letter to the Council dated October 30th.
�=�
�i
i
Page No. 2394
November 5, 1985
He informed the Council that he has walked the site
with representetivea of the Park Commiasion and Dod,g•
Nature Center and Public Works Director Danielson an•
there wea some question about aurfacing of the trail
between the ponda. He atated that the developer's
egreement specifies blacktop but if the Park
Commisaion prefera wood chipa or limeatane ae had be�
suggested by their representntive, that will be
acceptable to him. Mr. Futnam informed the Council
that Lyman Lumber Company hea become an equity partn<
in the development of the pro�ect.
Councilmember Blesener stated that one of her concer�
at the last meeting was the bubble Ccul-de-sac) off
Huber Drive �nd asked whether there is some possible
way the cul-de-sac from the west cnn be extended. M:
Putnam described the topography of the land and stat�
that one alternative would be to extend the bubble a
the way through. He stnted however that he would
prefer not to plat lota with the rear yards on Huber
Drive end that he doea not know of e way better than
what is propoaed which would make the lota look good
Mr. Putnam informed the Council that the developer's
agreement stipuletea a apecific aize o£ tree mov i
Section 11 and asked that the size be deleted be .s�
he may want to use a larger mover.
The Council acknowledged receipt of the copies of th
restrictive covenanta for the plat and a petition fc
public improvementa and wrsiver of hearing..
Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the develope
agreement for Copperfield with changes in paragraph
one of section 10 to at8te asphalt or concrete
construction, deleting "and asphalt" in paragraph tw
section 10, and deleting 44" £rom paragraph 11.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: O .
Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolution
No. 85-86, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PETITION AND ORDERI
PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR COPPERFIELD
C SUBDIVISION CTANDEM CORPORATION) CIMPROVEMENT N0. 85
PROJECT N0. 4)."
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayea: 4
Nays: O
DEFERMENT REQUEST The Council acknowledged receipt of a memo from the
Public Worka Director and letter from Viaitatior
Monastery requesting the deferment of an assesamt..c
for Mendota Heights Road/T.H. 149 watermain
improvements egainst the Gott property recently
Page No. 2395
November 5, 1985
acquired by the Monastery. Mayor Lockwood stated that
the property was apparently purchaaed after the
asaeasment roll was adopted and doea not therefore
qualify for defermentawould not be in accordance with
City policy on the deferment of assesamenta.
It was the concensus that if Visitation has
information which would aupport deferment approval,
they may come before the Council again with a request.
Councilmember Cummins moved to deny the request for
deferment of assessments without pre�udice.
Councilmember Hartmann aeconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: O
CASE NO. 85-28, Mr. Nick Linsmayer was present to request approval
LINSMAYER a 20 foot variance from the rear yard setback
requirement to allow conatruction of a home on Lot
Block l, Valley View Oak 1st Addition.
.� Ayea : 4
Nays: O
CASE NO. 85-29,
LINVILL
{.
COMPUTER SYSTEM
Ayes: 4
� Nays: O
YORKTON FEASIBILITY
STUDY •
of
17.
Councilmember Blesener moved to grant a 20 foot rear
yard setback varisnce, sub�ect to a 30 foot area beinc
provided along the west sideyard, for Lot 17, Block 1,
Valley View Oak lat Addition.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Administrator F'razell informed the Council that the
applicant ia unable to be present for the discusaion
and asked that the matter be tabled to November 19th.
Mr. Dave McCauley was preaent to briefly review and
answer Council questions on the proposed request for
propoaals for computer software and equipment.
After discussion, Councilmember Blesener moved to
approve the Request for Proposals and authorize
advertisement for bids to be received on December 2nd
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Public Works Director Danielsort reviewed the
£easibility study on proposed improvements to serve
the Yorkton property and ad�acent a'reas. �
Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No
85-87, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND
CALLING FOR HE�NG ON PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER,
STORM SEWER, STREETS AND LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS TO
SERVE THE YORKTON CENTRE POINTE SOUTH SUBDIVISION AND
�
•:,,..
�
11
ADJACENT AREAS <IMPROVEMENT
the hearing to be conducted
Mayor Lockwood seconded the
Ayes: 4
Nays: O
Page No. 2396
November 5, 1985
N0. 84, PROJECT NO. 4),"
on December 3rd.
motion.
EASEMENT VACATION Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpoae of :
public hearing on an application from Thomaa Dolan £o.
the vacation o£ a utility eaaement over Lot 5, Block
1, Brompton Courts Addition. Mr. Dolan informed the
Council that he has recently sold the property and
felt an obligation to puraue the eesement vacation.
He atated that he does not know what the easement was
originally dedicated for.
Public Works Director Danielson informed the Council
that no utilitiea are within the easement area and
there is no City need to retain the easement. It was
noted by the Council membera that the eesement also
runs across part of Lot 6 and that perhaps the owner
of the lot ahould be contacted to see whether he also
desirea an easement vacation.
Mayor Lockwood asked for questions and comments f
the audience.
There being no questions or comments, Councilmember
Blesener moved that the hearing be closed and that
Resolution No. 85-88, "RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION
OF UTILITY EASEMENT IN LOT 5, BLOCK 1, BROMPTON
COURTS" be adopted.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: O
NOISE REGULATIONS City Treasurer Shaughnessy reviewed his memos and a
report from John Shardlow expresaing their concerna
regarding propoaed amendmenta to the Pollution Contro
Agency's rulea governing airport noiae. He informed
the Council that a public hearing on the propoaed
. amendmenta will be conducted by the PCA on November
19th. Mr. Shaughnessy and Bernard Friel, the City's
repreaentative on MASAC reaponded to Council question�
on the matter. Mr. Friel stated that the City ahould
be concerned over the liability it might £ace i£ it
. implements the state regulations and compliea with th�
imposition o£ use requirements on land that is
.affected by noise.
After discussion, Council directed that Mr.
Shaughnessy prepare a draft o£ comments for
presentation to the Hearing Examiner at the PCA
hearing and to submit the comments to Mr. Friel and
. ..{, . . .
Page No. 2397
November 5, 1985
City Planner Dahlgren.
MOTOR VEHICLE Police Chief Delmont reviewed the proposed Motor
ORDINANCE Vehicle Ordinance and responded to Council questions
on the matter. There was some discussion regarding
� the parking/storage o£ recreational vehicles and it
was determined that the m�tter should be considered
when the Zoning Ordinsnce updating process occurs.
It was noted that section 4.13C2) should be corrected
to read "or any truck in excess of 9,000 pounds"
rather than any vehicle.
Ayea: 4
Nays: O
Ayea: 4
Nays: O
rrir.
• Ayes: 4
, Nays: O
Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Ordinance No.
218, "AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CERTAIN MOTOR VEHICLE AN.I
PARKING ORDINANCES."
Councilmember Bleaener seconded the motion.
Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of Ordinance No
219, "AN ORDINANCE REGULATING MOTOR VEHICLES AND
TRAFFIC," and authorization of summary publication in
form prepared by the City Attorney.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Councilmember Hartmann moved to re-number all
remaining ordinancea in Section 11 of the City's Code
of Ordinances.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
PUBLIC WORKS RADIOS On the recommendation of the Police Chie£,
Councilmember Hartmann moved to authorize radio
consultant John DuBois to acquire public worka
radio equipment and police/fire antennae £rom the ISD
191 bid, at a cost of 529,711.84.
Mayor Lockwood aeconded the motion. �
Ayeg: 4
Nays: O
� HIGHWAY 13 TASK FORCE The Council acknowledged s letter from Lilydale Mayor
� Bream and a memo from the City Administrator
recommending that Council appoint a representative to
serve on s �oint Mendota Heighta/Lilydale/Mendota T.H
13 Task Force. Councilmembers Blesener and Hartmann
.both volunteered to serve on the committee.
It was the concensus of the Council to appoint
Councilmembers Blesener and Hartmann to alternate on
the Task Force.
ha •.
Page No. 2398
November 5, 1985
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY The Council acknowledged a memo from the City Admini•s
trator and a letter from the Suburban Rate Authority
asking the City to contribute financially to the
Suburban Rate Authority's efforta in the NSP electric
rate increase caae. It was the concensus that Counci
/ had no interest in participating financielly.
l
EIDE ESTATES Council acknowledged and briefly discussed a memo fro
the Public Works Director requeating Council directic
on the deaireability or need for acquiring either a
lot or an easement in the Eide Estates to provide
utility and street access to the Perkegwin property.
It was the concensus of the Council thet no action
should be taken on the matter since there is no
development proposal for the Perkegwin property and
the property cen be served £rom Dodd Road.
F'IRE CODE Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Ordinance Nc
220, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 1007," to
adopt the 1982 edition of the Uniform Fire Code.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: O
T.H. 149 TRAFFIC Councilmember Blesener expressed concern over
increased traf£ic on T.H. 149 from I-494 and asked
that the passibility of inatelling stop aigna on T.H.
149 between I-494 and T.H. 110 be explored. Staff we
directed to pursue the matter with Mn/DOT.
MISCELLANEOUS Councilmember Cummins informed the Council that he
will be unable to attend the November 19th meeting.-
Councilmember Hartmann stated that weeds in the ditch
at Downing and T.H. 13 are creeting a aite obstructic
and asked that Public Works cut the weeds.
Administrator Frazell stated that Councilmember Witt
has asked him to express her concern over the
constantly incompleted stnte of remodeling o£ a house
located at Marie and Delsware.
ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the
Council, Councilmember Hartmann moved that the meetin
Fege . No . 2399
November S, 1985
be ad�ourned.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: O
TIME dF ADJOURNMENT: 11:20 P.M.
ATTEST:
----------------------------------------�
Kathleen M. Swanaon
City Clerk
... -----------------------------------
' Robert G. Lockwood
Mayor
0
.
�.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE N0.
(Codified as Ordinance No. )
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC
SECTION 1 DEFINTIONS
Subdivision 1. Terms. For the purposes of this ordinance, the terms
defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them.
(1) Authorized emergency vehicle. "Authorized emergency vehicle" means
any of the following vehicles when equipped and identified according to
law: (a) A vehicle of a fire department; (b) a publicly owned police
vehicle or a privately owned vehicle used by a police officer for police
work under agreement, express or implied, with the local authority to
which he is responsible; (c) a ve hicle of a licensed land emergency
ambulance service, whether publicly or privately owned; (d) an emergency
vehicle of a municipal department or a public service corporation,
approved by the commissioner of public safety or the chief of police of a
municipality; (e) any volunteer rescue squad operating pursuant to Laws
1959, Chapter 53; (f) a vehicle designated as an authorized emergency
vehicle upon a finding by the commissioner of public safety that
designation of that vehicle is necessary to the preservation of life or
property or to the execution of emergency governmental functions.
(2) Bicycle. "Bicycle" means every device propelled solely by human power
upon which any person may ride, having two tandem wheels except scooters
and similar devices and including any device generally recognized as a
bicycle though equipped with two front or rear wheels.
(3) Bus. "Bus" means every motor vehicle designed for carrying more than
ten passengers and used for the transportation of persons, and every motor
vehicle other than a taxicab designed and used for the transportation of
persons for compensation.
(4) Business District. "Business district" means those areas of the City
designated on the City's official zoning map as "B" Districts.
(5) Crosswalk. "Crosswalk" means any portion of a roadway distinctly
indicated for pedestrian crossing by lines or other markings on the
surface.
(6) Controlled access highway. "Controlled access highway" means every
highway, street, or roadway in respect to which the right of access of the
owners or occupants of abutting lands and other persons has been acquired
and to which the owners or occupants of abutting lands and other persons
have no legal right of access to or from the same except at such points
only and in such manner as may be determined by the City.
-1-
:•t
(7) Custom service vehicles. "Custom service vehicles" means all vehicles
used as well-drilling machine, wood-sawing machine, cement mixer, rock
crusher, road grader, ditch digger, or elevating grader, refuse hauling
truck, paving roller, portable generators, welders and air compressors
mounted on trailers and capable of being towed, motor graders,
caterpillars, and similar service equipment.
� (8) Driver. "Driver means every person who drives or is in actual
physical control of a vehicle.
(9) Farm tractor. "Farm tractor" means every motor vehicle designed and
used primarily as a farm implement for drawing plows, mowing-machines, and
other implements of husbandry.
(10) Gross weight. "Gross weight" means the unloaded weight of a vehicle
or the unloaded weight of a truck-tractor and semi-trailer combination,
plus the weight of the load.
(11) Industrial District. "Industrial district" means those areas of the
City designated on the City's official zoning map as "I" district.
(12) Laned highway. "Laned highway" means a highway the roadway of which
is divided into two or more clearly marked lanes for vehicular traffic.
(13) Motor vehicle. "Motor vehicle" means every vehicle which is self-
propelled and every vehicle which is propelled by electric power obtained
from overhead trolley wires. Motor vehicle does not include a vehicle
, moved solely by human power.
(14) Motor Vehicle Parts. "Motor vehicle parts" means any part,
accessory, attachment, or piece of equipment commonly used on or in .�
connection with a inotor vehicle. ��-
(15) Motorcycle. "Motorcycle" means every motor vehicle having a seat or
saddle for the use of the rider and designed to travel on not more than
three wheels in contact with the ground, including motor scoot:ers and
bicycles with motor attached, other than those vehicles defined as •
motorized bicycles in subdivision 15, but excluding a tractor. -•-
(16) Motorized bicycle. "Motorized bicycle" means a bicycle with fully
operatable pedals which may be propelled by human power or a motor, or by
both, with a motor of a capacity of less than 50 cubic centimeters piston
displacement, a maximum of two brake horsepower, which is capable of a
� maximum speed of not more than 30 miles per hour on a flat surface with
not more than one percent grade in any direction when the motor is
engaged.
(17) Official traffic control devices. "Official traffic control devices"
means all signs, signals, markings, and devices not inconsistent with this
section placed or erected by authority of a public body or official having
jurisdiction, for the purpose of regulating, warning, or guiding traffic.
-2-
(18} One-way raadway. "One-way roadway" means a street ar roadway
designated and sign-posted for one-way traffic and on which all vehicl�s
are required to move in one indicated direction.
(19) Owner. "Owner" means a person who holds the legal �itle of a
vehicle, or in the event a vehicle is the subjecC af an agreem�nt far the
canditianal sale or lease thereof with the right of purchase upon
� performance of the canditians stated in the agre�ment and with an
� immediete right of possession vested in the conditional vende� or lessee,
or zn the event a mortgagor of a vehicle is entitled to possession, then
such canditional vendee or Iessee or martgagor shall be deemed the owner
for the purpose of this Ordinance,
(20) Pedestrian. "P�destrian" means any person afoot.
(21) Police ofEicer, "Police officer" means every officer authorized to
direct or regulate traffic or ta �ke arresCs for violatiaas of traffic
regulations.
{22} Private road or driveway. "Private road or driveway" means every way
or place in private awnership and used for vehicular travel by the owner
and those having express ar implied permission from the awner, but nat by
other persons.
(23) Residential District. "Residential district" means �hose areas of
the Ci�y designated on the City's offic2al zoning map as "R" districts.
(24) Right of way. "Right of way" means the privilege of the immediate
use of street or highway.
{25) Raad tractor. "Road tractor" means every motor vehicle designed and
used for drawing other ve hicles and not so constructed as to carry any
laad thereon either independently ar any part of the weight of a vehicl�
or load so drawn. .
(26) Roadway. "Roadway" means that portion of a highway impraved,
designed, or ordinarily used �or vehicular �ravel, exclusive aF the
sidewalk or shoulder even though such sidewalk or shaulder is used by
persons riding bicycl�s or other human powered vehicles. In the event a
highway includes two or more separate roadways the term "roadway" as used
herein shall refer to any such roadway separately but not to all such
roadways collectively,
� (27) Safety zone. "Safety zone" means the area or space officially set
� apart within a roadway far the exclusive use of pedestrians and which is
pratected or is so marked or indicated by adequa�e signs as to be plainly
visib�e at a1I times.set apart as a safety zane.
{28) School bus. "Schoal bus" means every motor vehiele owned by a
public ar governmental agency and aperated for Che transpartaCion o£
children to or irom schaol or privately owned and operated for
compensation for the transpor�ation of children �o or from schaol.
-3-
{29} Semi-trailer. "Semi-trailer" means every vehicle without motive
pawer designed for carrying persons ar praperty and for being drawn by a
motor vehicle and so constructed that same part of its weight and that of
its load rests upan or is carried by anather vehicle.
(30) Service vehicle. "Service vehicle" means a motor vehi-cIe owned and
� operated by a person, firm or corporation engaged in a business which
includes the repairing or servicing of vehicles. The term alsa includes
snow removal and road maint�nance equipment not operated by or under
contract ta the state or governmental subdivision.
(31) Sidewalk. "Sidewalk" means that portion of a street between the curb
lines, or the lateral lines of a roadway, and the adjacent property Iines
intended far the use of pedestrians.
(32) Stand or standing. "Stand or standing" means the halting of a.;,
vehicle, whether accupied or not, atherwise than temporarily for the�
purpose of and while actually engaged in receiving ar discharging
gassengers.
{33) Stop. "Stop" means complete cessation from movement.
{34) Stopping. "Stopping" means any halting even mamentarily of a
vehicle, whether occupied or not, excepC when necessary ta avaid conflict
with ather traffic ar in complaince ari.th the directions of a police
afficer or traffic con�rol sign or signal,
(35) Street or highway. "Street or highway" means the entire width
between boundary lines of any way or place when any part �hereof is open
to the use of the public, as a mat�er of right, for the gurpases of
vehicular traf£ic.
�� :
,•f
(36) Thraugh street. "Through street" means every street or portiori
thereaf at the entrances to which vehicular traffic from intersecting
stree�s is required by law to stop before entering ar crossing the same
and when stap sigris are erected as grovided in this ordinance,
(37) Traffic. "Traffic" means pedestrians, ridden or herded animals,
vehicles or ather conveyances, either singly or together, while using any
streeC or highway for purposes af tra'vel.
(38) Traffic cantrol signal.. "Traffic control signal" means any device,
whether manually, electrically ar mechanically operated, by which traffic
� is alternately directed to stop and permitted to proceed.
(39) Trailer. "Trai�.er" means every vehicle without motive power
designed �or carrying persons or property and for being drawn by a�motor
vehicle and so canstructed that no part of its weight rests upon the
towing vehicle.
(4Q) Truck. "Truck" means every motor vehicle designed, used or
maintained primarily far the transportation of praperty.
-�-
(41) Truck-tractor. "Truck-tractor" means every motor vehicle designed
and used primarily for drawing other vehicles and not so constructed as to
carry a load other than a part of the weight of the vehicle and load so
drawn.
(42) Vehicle. "Vehicle" means every device in, upon or by which any
person or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a highway
� (excepting devices used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks).
(43) Wrecker. "Wrecker means a motor vehicle having a gross vehicle
weight of 8,000 pounds or more, equipped with a crane and winch and
f urther equipped to control the movement of the towed vehicle.
SECTION 2 STATE HIGHWAY TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT
The regulatory provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1973, Chapter 169, known
as the Highway Traffic Regulation Act, as amended by Laws of 1982, is
��f hereby adopted as a traffic ordinance regulating the use of highways,
streets and alleys within the City of Mendota Heights and are hereby
incorporated in and made a part of this ordinance as completely as if set
forth herein.
SECTION 3 SCOPE OF ORDINANCE
3.1 Unless otherwise declared by Chapter 169 with respect to particular
offenses, it is a petty misdemeanor for any person to perform any
act forbidden or fail to perform any act required by this
Ordinance, except a violation which is committed in a manner or
under circumstances so as to endanger or be likely to endanger any
person or property.
3.2 No person shall willfully fail or refuse to comply with any lawful
order or direction of any peace officer invested by law with the
authority to direct, control or regulate traffic.
SECTION 4 STOPPING, STAND.ING AND PARKING
4.1 General Provisions
4.1(1)Any vehicle parked at any time on any public street in any part of
the City of Mendota Heights shall be parked with the right-hand side
parallel to the edge of the paved or improved road and not more than
one foot from the edge of the paved or improved road, leaving at
�, least four feet between parked vehicles except where marks or signs
in the street indicate that cars shall be parked at an angle.
4.1(2) It is unlawful- for any person to remove, erase or otherwise
obliterate any mark or sign placed upon a tire or other part of a
vehicle by a police officer for the purpose of ineasuring the length
of time such vehicle has been parked.
4.2 Unattended Vehicles
4.2(1) No person shall leave a motor vehicle unattended on any road,
-S-
0
street or highway in the city with the engine running.
4.2(2) No person shall leave a motor vehicle parked unattended in the City
on a street, road or highway, in any parking area, or in any public
or private driveway, with the key in the ignition or the ignition
unlocked.
� 4.2(3) Whenever any police officer shall find any such motor vehicle
� standing in violation of the foregoing provision, such police
officer is authorized and directed to remove the keys from such
vehicle and retain the same until called for by the owner of said
motor vehicle.
4.3 Passage Interference
No automobile or other vehicle shall occupy any road or stree�,�fin
the city so as to interfere with or interrupt the passage of other
cars or vehicles.
4.4 Places Prohibited Generally
No person shall stop, stand or park a motor vehicle, except when necessary
to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions
of a police officer or traffic-control device, in any of the following
places:
4.4(1) On or blocking a sidewalk, bikeway or pedestrian-way or blocking a
:-;� driveway, bikeway or pedestrian-way entrance.
4.4(2) In front of a public or private driveway;
4.4(3) Within an intersection; :^�
4.4(4) Within ten (10) feet of a fire hydrant, fire department sprinkler
connection or fire department standpipe connection;
4.4(5) On a crosswalk;
4.4(6) Within twenty (20) feet of a crosswalk at an
intersection;
4.4(7) Within thirty (30) feet upon the approach to any flashing beacon,
stop sign, or traffic-control signal located at the side of a
( street, roadway or highway; between a safety zone and the adjacent
� curb or within thirty (30) feet of points on the curb immediately
opposite the ends of a safety zone unless a different length is
indicated by.s�gns or markings; ;r
� 4]'
4.4(8) Within fifty (50) feet of the nearest rail of a
railroad crossing;
4.4(9) Within twenty (20) feet of the driveway entrance to any fire
station and on the side street opposite the entrance to any fire
station within seventy-five (75) feet of said entrance when
-6-
r.
properly sign-posted;
4.4(10)Alongside or opposite any street, roadway or highway excavation or
obstruction when such stopping, standing, or parking would obstruct
f:• traffic;
4.4(11)On the street, roadway or highway side of any vehicle
( stopped or parked at the edge or curb of a street;
4.4(12)Upon any bridge or other elevated structure upon a street, roadway
or highway or within a highway tunnel, except as otherwise provided
by ordinance;
4.4(13)At any place where official signs prohibit parking.
4.5 Handicapped Parking
4.5(1) No person shall park a motor vehicle in a parking space designated
and reserved for the physically handicapped, on either private or
public property, unless:
4.5(1) a. That person is physically handicapped in a manner rendering it
difficult and burdensome for such person to walk or such person
is operating the vehicle under the direction of such a
physically handicapped person; and
4.5(1) b. The vehicle visibly bears or contains the certificate or
-::�-.� insignia issued to physically handicapped persons by the
Minnesota Department of Public Safety pursuant to Minnesota
Statute Chapter 169.345, Subd. 2.
4.5(2) Notice of such designation of handicapped parking spaces shall be
given by the posting of appropriate signs.
4.5(3) In any prosecution charging a violation of the above provisions,
proof of the identity of the registered owner of the particular
vehicle described in the citation or complaint at the time of the
violation shall create a prima facie presumption that the
individual was the person who parked such vehicle at the point
where the violation occurred.
4.5(4) A violation of this section shall constitute a petty misdemeanor.
Vehicles in violation may be removed, impounded and kept in custody
� under the direction of the Chief of Police.
4.6 Consent for Private Parking
No person shall park or leave a motor vehicle standing upon the
private property of another person without first receiving consent
of the owner of such property.
• -7-
V
J
4.7 Special Parking Areas
Special parking areas may be designated by the City Council from
time to time by resolution for truck parking or for taxicab parking
and when so designated, no other vehicles may stand, stop, or park
in such areas.
( 4.8 Parking in Privately and Publicly Owned Parking Lots
And Parking Areas
4.8(1) Maximum Speed and Manner of OperatinR Motor Vehicles
Generally
4.8(1) a. No person shall operate a motor vehicle on any parking lot or
parking area in the City, whether privately or publicly owned,
at a speed greater than is safe and reasonable under the �.
conditions of traffic then existing therein, and in no event
shall any such vehicle be operated in excess of a speed of 15
miles per hour.
4.8(1) b. All operation and driving of motor vehicles on such parking lots
or parking areas shall be done in a careful manner so that no
sudden starting or erratic movement of such vehicle is
deliberatly engaged in by the driver.
4.8(1) c. It shall be unlawful for any person to operate any motor vehicle
upon such parking lot or parking areas in any manner that would
constitute careless driving if done on a public street.
4.8(1) d. No person shall engage in any drag racing or exhibition driving
on any such parking lot or parking area.
�_
'� �
4.8(2) ParkinQ Uniformity
Parking of vehicles on such parking lots or parking areas shall
conform to the markings of.stalls or positions for parkin.g which
� are designated��on the surface of the parking area`anii"no�vehicles
shall be parked or allowed to stand in any area of such parking lot
or parking area which has been designated or is used as a fire lane
or a lane for moving traffic so that such parking will interfere
' with fire prevention or firefighting or with the movement of
traffic therein.
� 4.8(3) Traffic Control Si�ns
4.8(3) a. The Police Department of the City may post signs at any entrance
- to a parking•lot from a public street which shall designate one-
way traffic for entrance and exit and the driver of any vehicle
entering or leaving such lot shall comply with any signs so
posted.
4.8(3) b. Where a privately or publicly owned parking lot or area in the
City has traffic-control signs within said lot or area
�
�
indicating traffic direction, speed, yield or stop, the driver
of any vehicle upon such lot or parking area shall comply with
any such signs.
4.8(4) Notice of Collision
In the event that any person who drives a motor vehicle upon such
C parking lot or parking area becomes involved in a collision between
the vehicle he is driving and any other vehicle or vehicles parking
upon said lot or area, such driver shall leave a notice upon each
unattended vehicle with which he has collided, giving his name,
address and license number. Failure on the part of any person to
comply with this paragraph shall constitute a violation of this
ordinance.
4.9 RF.NIOVAL OF VEHICLE BY POLICE
4.9(1) When any police officer of the City finds a vehicle standing upon a
street, roadway or highway in violation of any of the provisions of
this ordinance, such officer is hereby authorized to move such
vehicle or require the driver or other person in charge of the
vehicle to move said vehicle to a position not in violation of any
section of this ordinance.
4.9(2) Any vehicle, wherever found, whether on public or private property,
in violation of this ordinance or other ordinances of the City or
the laws of the state is hereby declared to be a nuisance. Any
police officer of the City may require the driver or other person
in charge of the vehicle to move said vehicle to a position not in
violation of any section of this ordinance or said vehicle may be
removed, under the direction or at the request of a police officer,
to any public or private garage or parking area until claimed by
the owner thereof as hereafter provided.
4.9(3) Any vehicle found upon the streets of the City in such a damaged
condition or state of disrepair that it cannot be driven and which,
in the opinion of a police officer, constitutes an obstruction of
the street, may be removed and impounded by the police department
to a place of storage; provided, that if the owner or operator has
requested, such vehicle may be towed to the owner's own garage
or any other garage.
C 4.10 RECOVERY OF STORED VEHICLE
\4.10(1) As soon as practicable after the removal of said vehicle parked in
violation of the provisions of this ordinance, the City Police
' Department sliall notify, in writing, the person known to be the
owner of such vehicle by the registration thereof, of the following
facts:
4.10(1) a. A general description of the vehicle together
with the license number; .
�
e
4.1Q(1} b, The approximate time and the reason for removal
and the place to which removed.
4.10(2}Before any vehi.cle sa removed and stored shall be reclaimed, the
owner or ather claimant sha11 satisfactorily identify himself and
establish his right, title or in�erest ta said vehicle and the
�_ right to poss�ssion thereof and �ha11 further pay all costs or
� charges in cannection with Che removal and starage of such vehicle
and notice thereof.
The payment of such charges shall not relieve the owner or other
person responsible for such violation from the payment of any fine
or penalty for violations af the provisions of this ar any other
applicable ordi.nance of the City or laws af the state. It shall be
unlawful �or any person to reclaim the vehicle so remaved and
stored without first paying all of the said costs, charges or
penalties.
4.11 Vehicles on Parkways, in Parks or Upon Public Grounds
4.11(1) The operator, driver, owner or persan in charge af any vehicle
used or driven over ar upon the streets and raads af the City
must observe all of the following regulations upon aJ.l parkway�
and within the limits of all parics and upon any publicly owned
grounds in the ca.ty.
4.11(1) a. No vehicle shall be left sCandi.ng or parked except in
designated parking spaces, and vehicles must be parked so
that an unobstructed view into the interiar af the vehicie
may be had at all times, and na curtains, papers or coverings
af any kind shall cover or conceal �he front, rear, or side
windows of any parked vehicle.
4.11(1) b. No vehicle shall be left standing ar parked upon any foot
path ar in any area in which parking is restricted.
4.11(1) c. No person shall be in any park, and no person sha11 remain in
or leave any vehicle in any park, or upan any parkway or
pub].ic grounds between the hours of eleven o'clock p.m.'and
six o'clock a.m. of the fallowing marning. Nothing in this
section shall apply to persons traveling upon es�ablished
driveways of parks, or upon parlcways.
C 4.12 Junk Cars
4.12(1) Definitian.
"Junk car" means any motor vehicle which; a) for a period af
thirty {30} days or more is nat in operable condi�ian, or (b} far
a period of thir�.y (30) days or more is partially dismantled, or
(c) is used for sale of parts or as a saurce of repair or
replacement parts for other vehicles, or (d} is kept �or
-10-
scrapping, dismantling, or salvage of any kind, ar (e) for a
period af thirty (30) days or more is not praperly licensed for
operation within the State of MinnesaCa.
4.12(2} Parking and Storage
No gersan shall park, keep, place, or s�ore ar permit the parking
or storage of a junk car on a public street or alley, or on any
private lands ar premises which he owns, accupies, or controls
� unless it sha11 be within a building on such private premises.
4,12(3) Repair, Service or Maintaining
No person shall service, repair, replace parts or do maintenance
wark on a junk car on a public street nar on any private lands or
premises unless it shall be within a building an such private
premises.
4.12(4) Provisions of Other Ordinances
Nothing herein cantained sha11 in any way be deemed to permit the
keeping, storing, ar parking of junk cars ar the servicing,
repairing, replacing of parts on, or main�enance of junk cars in
violation of the provisions of the City Zoning Ordinance, as
amended, or of any other ordinance of the City of Mendota Heights.
4.13 Truck and Cus�om Service Vehicle Parking
�.13(I} It is unlawfui to park a semi-trailer upon any street, City-owned
parking iat, or other public property.
4.13{2) Tt is unlawful to park a semi-trailer, truck-tractar, or a
combination thereof, or any custam service vehicle as defined by
this ordinance,��-ve�i-r3.� in excess of 9,000 pounds gross
vehicle weight within an area zoned as a residential district
except £or the purpose of Iaading or unloading the sarne if such
vehicle is in the process of making a delzvery.
4.14 Parking During Snowfall
4.14(1) No person shall allow any vehicle �o park or stand upon any street
or road in �he City for more than �hirty (30) minu�es during the
time intervening between a snowfall of twa inche� or more and the
plawing or removai thereof.
� 4,14(2} Any vehicle stapped, garked, abandoned or atherwise unattended in
` violation of this section is hereby declared to be an obstructian
of City streets and shall be declared ta be a nuisance.
4,14(3) In the event any vehicle is stopped, parked, abandaned or
otherwise left unattended in violation of the provisions af this
section, any police afficer of the City or the City Public Works
Superintendent is hereby authorized to remove or cause to be
remaved any such vehicle and ta have such vehicle tawed or
-11-
otherwise removed to any public or private garage or parking area
and stored in such garage or parking area until claimed by the
owner as provided in Sectian 4.10 of this Ordinance.
4.15 Vehicle Repair on Stree�
It is unlawful for any persan to service, repair, assemble ar
� dismantle any vehicle parked upon a street, or attempt �o do so,
except to service such vehicle with gasaline ar oil ar �o provide
emergency repairs thereon, but in no event for more than six (6)
hours.
SECTION S SNOWMOBILES
5.1 Definitions
S.l(1)�nowmobile. Snowmobile means a self-propelled vehicle designed for
�ravel on snow or ice or on a natural terrain steered by wheels,
skis, or runners.
S.1(2)Owner. Owner means a person, other than a lien holder, having the
praperty in ar title to a s�owmobile or entitled to the use ar
possession thereo£.
5.1(3)Operator. Operator means every persan wha operates or
is in actual physical cantral of a snawmobile.
.,� 5.1(4)Operate. Operate means to ride in or on and control
�he aperation of a snawmobile.
S.l(5}Register. Register means the act af assigning a
registration number to a snowmobile.
S.l(b)Roadway. Roadway means that partion of a street, highway or road
which is impraved, designed, or ardinarily used for vehicular
travel,
5.2 State Regulations Adopted
Minnesota Statutes 19b9, sections $4,$1 through 84.88, as amended by
Laws af 1980 are hereby adopted as snowmobile regulations of the
city and made a part of this sec�ion by reference as if fully set
� forth herein.
5.3 Snowmabile Registration
Except as herein provided, no person shall operate any snowmab�le
within the City of Mendota Heigh�s, except on the private properCy
� af the owner of the snowmobile, unless such snawmobile has been
registered in accordance wi�h the Laws o� the Sta�e of Minnesota.
-12-
5.4 Exceptions
No registration hereunder shall be required for the following
described snowmobiles:
5.4(1)Snowmobiles owned and used by the United States,
any state, county or municipality.
/ 5.4(2) Snowmobiles registered in a country other than the
� United States temporarily used within this state.
5.4(3) Snowmobiles covered by a valid license of another state and which
have been within this state for not more than thirty (30)
consecutive days.
S.S Operation
Except as herein provided, no person shall operate a snowmobile
. within the City of Mendota Heights except upon private property with
the written permission of the owner of such private property.
5.6 Operation, Exceptions
5.6(1)A snowmobile may be operated upon a public street or highway in an
emer�ency during the period of time when, and at locations where,
snow upon the roadway renders travel by automobile impractical.
5.6(2)A snowmobile may be operated at anytime, anywhere, within the City
��- of Mendota Heights under emergency circumstances by any police
officer or duly authorized official, agent, or employee of the City.
5.7 Operation Generally
It shall be unlawful for any person to drive or
operate any snowmobile in the following unsafe or harassing ways:
5.7(1) At a rate of speed greater than reasonable or proper
under all the surrounding circumstances;
5.7(2) In a careless, reckless or negligent manner so as to endanger the
operator or the person or property of another or to cause injury or
damage thereto.
5.7(3) While under the influence of intoxicating liquor or
� narcotics or habit forming drugs.
5.7(4) Without a lighted head and tail light after sunset and
before sunrise or when otherwise required f or safety.
5.7(5) To leave or allow a snowmobile to be or remain
unattended on public property.
-13-
.;
5.7(6) To operate a snowmobile in a manner so as to create a loud,
unnecessary or unusual noise which disturbs, annoys or interferes
with the peace and quiet of other persons.
5.7(7) To operate a snowmobile within one hundred (100) feet of any
skating rink or sliding area, or in any other area where the
' operation would conflict with use or endanger other persons or
property.
� 5.8 Required Equipment
All snowmobiles shall have the following equipment:
5.8(1) Standard mufflers which are properly attached and which reduce the
noise of operation of the machine to the minimum noise necessary
for operating the machine and no person shall use a muffler cut-
out, by-pass, or similar device on said machine.
5.8(2) A head light and tail light if the snowmobile is
operated after dark.
5.8(3) Brakes adequate to control the movement of and to
stop and hold a snowmobile.
5.8(4) A safety or deadman throttle which automatically cuts the fuel
supply to the engine whenever the operator releases pressure on
the throttle.
5.9 Liability
A person registered as owner of a snowmobile may be fined not to
exceed three hundred dollars if a snowmobile bearing his
registration number is operated contrary to the provisions of this
section. The registered owner may not be so fined if�(a) the ,.a
snowmobile was reported as stolen to a law enforcement agency at the
time of the alleged unlawful act, or if (b) the registered owner
demonstrates that the snowmobile either was stolen or was not in use
at the time of the alleged unlawful act, or if (c) the registered
owner furnished to law enforcement officers, upon request, the
identity of the person in actual physical control of the snowmobile
at the time of such violation. The provisions of this section do
not apply to any person who rents or leases a snowmobile if such
person keeps a record of the name and address of the person or
persons renting or leasing such snowmobile, the registration number
�thereof, the departure date and time and expected time of return
, thereof. Such record shall be preserved for at least six months and
shall be prima facie evidence that the person named therein was the
operator thereof at the time it was operated contrary to this
section. The p"rovisions of this section do not prohibit or limit
the prosecution of a snowmobile operator for violating any
. provisions of this section.
-14-
5= e
�
0
SECTION 6 RECREATIONAL MOTOR VEHICLES
6.1 Definition.
Recreational motor vehicle means any motor vehicle designed for,
used or capable of use for sport, amusement or recreation, whether
or not eligible to be licensed for use upon streets, and highways,
including, but not limited to motor bikes, motor scooters, trail
C bikes, mini bikes, motorcycles, go-karts, hovercraft, snowmobiles
converted to use with wheels, all-terrain vehicles or dunebuggies,
but excluding motor vehicles designed for commercial, industrial or
agricultural use and snowmobiles propelled by tracks.
6.2 Operation of Recreational Motor Vehicles
It shall be unlawful to operate a recreational motor vehicle withi
the City:
;;:#= 6.2(1) Upon private property without the written permission of the owner
�. or person entitled to possession thereof; subject, however, to the
following:
This restriction shall not apply to motor vehicles registered under
Minnesota Statutes, Chpater 168, when operated by a driver licensed
under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 171 upon private driveways,
roadways, lanes, ways or parking lots where the operation of
licensed motor vehicles is not expressly prohibited by posted
notice.
- 6.2(2) Upon any school grounds, public park, playground, recreational
area, golf course, or other public property.
A�:
6.2(3) Upon any public sidewalk, bikeway, walkway or boulevard.
6.2(4) Upon the right-of-way of any public street or highway unless:
6.2(4) a. The recreational motor vehicle is licensed under Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 168, and
6.2(4) b. The operator is licensed under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 171,
and
6.2(4) c. The vehicle is operated upon the improved portion of the right-
of-way.
� 6.3 Movement of Unlicensed Recreational Motor Vehicles
No unlicensed recreational motor vehicle may be moved along or
across a street�or highway with a person seated thereon, whether or
not the engine is operating. Such vehicles may be moved along or
across a street or highway by pushing, and only when doing so
creates no hazard to moving vehicular traffic on the street or
highway.
-15-
a
6.4 Recreational Vehicle Noise Limits
Recreational motor veh9.cles shall meet the noise limits established
for motorcycles by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 169.
SECTION 7. RECREATIONAL CAMPING VEHICLE PARKING
7.1 Definition.
� The term "recreational camping vehicl.e" means any af the fo7.I.owa.ng:
7.i(1) Camping Trailer. Camping trailer means a folding structure,
mounted on wheels and designed far travel, recreation and vacation
uses.
7.1{2} Motar Home, Motor home means a matar vehicle designed,
constructed, or used to provide movable living quarters for
•�: recreatianal use.
• 7,1(3) Pick-up Coach. Pick-up coach means a structure designed to be
mounted on a truck cfiassis for use as a temparary dwelling for
travel, recreation and vacation.
f' 7.1(4) Travel Trailer. Trave]. traa.ler means a vehicular, porCable
,
f' structure bui.lt on a chassis, designed ta be used as a temporary
' dwel.ling for travel, recreational, and vacation uses, permanently
identified "Travel Traa.ler" by the manufacturer af the trailer.
7.2 General Pravisa.ons
It sha11 be unlawful for any person to leave or park a recreational
camping vehicle on or within the limits of any street or right-of-
way for a continuous period i.n excess of �wenty-four (24) haurs'`
withaut the written permission oi the Chief af Police.
SECTION 8. COORDINATIQN OF PROVISIONS
8.1 Where a provision of any other ordinance of the City conflicts with
the provisians of this Ordinance, the provisions of this Qrdinance
, shall prevail.
SECTION 9. PENALTY
9.1 Any person violating any provisions of this Ordinance may be guilty
� of a misdemeanar and upon convic�ion may be punished by a fine of
not more �han seven hundred dallars {$700.00} or imprisoned ior nat
more than ninety (90) days or both, plus the cost of prosecution in
any case. . � '
:,�
�
:,
�
«�
�
�
SECTION 10. EFFECT OF ORDINANCE
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
publication according to law.
Enacted and ordained by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights
this day of , 1985.
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By Robert G.
Lockwood
Mayor
-17-
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
TREASURER'S REPORT - OCTOBF.R, 1985
L. SHAUGHNESSY
DAKOTA COUNTY STATE BANK
Checking Account
Savings Account
C.D. Due
Savings Cert. 3-26-86 @ 8.2%
Collateral - bonds $200,000
Gov't. Guar. 100,000
CHEROKEE STATE BANK
C.D. Due 1-7-86 @ 6.787 300,000.00
C.D. due 2-1-86 @ 7.647 125,000.00
Savings. Cert. 9-3-85@ 8.7. 13,952.59
TOTAL 438,952.59
Collateral - bonds 1,500,000
Gov't. Guar. 100,000
U.S. TREASURY BILLS
Due 3-20-86 $690,000 (AM) (10.60)
12-12-85 300,000 (lst) (9.85)
1-31-86 SS0,000
Collateral - bonds
Gov't. Guar.
MINNESOTA STATE BANK
C.D. Due
Collateral, Gov't. Guar.
MINNESOTA FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ST. PAUL
C.D. Due
Collateral - bonds
Gov't. Guar.
Repo.
BALANCE
$ 224,245.58
398.24
25,000.00
$ 249,643.82
$625,884.43
294,555.17
540,268.06
TOTAL FUND AVAILABLE: $2,149,304.07
COLLATERAL
$ 300,000
1,600,000
.;a;. Ml:N[�U'i'A 11l: I Gtt'2'S t� f lif: 1}t:l'A}<'i't•S!•:tJ'1'
-- t�fON`i'iiLY iti:5'C)R'i'
Fire Cal1s Na. $�"l�-� Thcu�5-�$2 Nurnbcr of Czlls�'7 Month �f Oct.'85 �, j
FIRE ALARMS DISPATCIi1,D
TXPE NO. STRUCTURE CONTENTS MISC. TQTALS TQ DATF.
� 2 ' 2$9d
Commercial
3 22,800
Residen�ia�l
' � 7365
Vehic2e Fires
0
Coc�tract Fires{All}
Vehicle Accidents 4 $ 600 S $
Monthl Loss To�als Men Ht s
Rescue �no fire) 2 Al1 Pires All Areas $ 33,055
.� Grass, Brush&No Va�1u� 2 Men Hgts anly StructJContents 2S�6g0
� False Alarm Criminal ''` Men Hgts Onl.y Miscellar�eaus 7r���
False " 1'' Commercial 1 Men Hgts Total Loss to Date S 32,455
False " Residencial 1 13ILLING FOR SERVIGES
Gaod Inten�Cal3.s
Haze�rdous Situatian " 2� �Q���'Y 'This Month To Date
TOTAL CALLS �� Mn:DOT
���.
• LOCATZON C?F FZRE ALARMS To i?ate Last Yr. Milw RR
Mendota Heigh�s 17 15$ 116 C1VW RR �
Mendota � t+ 7 Others
Sunfish Lake 11 3 �
T�TA LS S S
Lilydale �� 1.6
Other � t�, 3 F IRE MARSHAL � S TIM� FOR MONT�i
TOTAL , 17 lg2 145 Inspectians 22
� itORK P::RF4RMED Hours Ta Date Last Yr. Investigations
Fire Calls 349 2919 2970 R�inspec�ion
Meetings 32 333 303 , .�
Dr3.11s 76 572 � 616 Meetings , �_�
�. Neekly Clean-Up •44 451 225 Drilla, Training �
Special Traininq 42 582 324 A�������.$���n 50
Ad�inistrative ,�„� 455,_,. 276
� Total $3
Fire Marshal g3 215* 399
*since 8-1-$5
'I'C)'t'iil,S ____�� _ 5527 5113 __ (t��m�lzk:c : ;�c�c� o�h��r �.i�i�s oE Li7i.
� ,ll�<� l' 1 c�C mqnCh 1 y s J ryop.� 1..� .
M ' .
SYNOPSIS OF M4NTHLY RUNS
The deparGment res�onded to 17 calls during the monCh oL- Uctober. Of the
17 calls, only ane resulCed in a fire 1oss. Tt�is was an �ctaber 3 at 6.35 P.M.
The department responded and Eaund thaC a grease fire had started in tl7e sCave/
grilling area. The fire was extinguished immediately with a iire extinguisher.
�amage was estimated at $600. The department was also called to �our vehicle
accidents and two pre-Halloween fires at the bonfire site.
SXNOPSIS QF MONTHLY TRAINING
The department training was spent drilling with the use of Che fire extinguisher
� This was a very good drill that everyane seemed to enjay and 1e<�rn from. R�scue
drill was used �o familiarize people with the newly purchased equipmenC.
OTHER NEtJS
in October the department hel.d its first annual fire prevention week Open
Hause. tde had quite a few residents come to the statian. We had faur separate
�. areas for activity. These areas were: �
].. The proper use of fire extinguist�►ers with live demonstraCions.
2. How to prevent fires in the kitchen.
3. A fire preventa.on movie for Che children.
4. A picture display.
The apen hause was a success and we hape to make it better next year,
,
'`�'a FIRE DEPARTM�NT • ' MON1'ltLY WUftK � i'EKl'tlItMANC�: Montn (�.'%-o8p/, 1985
� Ca].ls for Pire E'ire Per- Clean Month-� ��us. C�ff�r Spe�. Oth�r Othe
•. Moctth Ca115 Calls cent Mcrt M�c:t Urill Act' Act'
Ye�x Tota� Att'd Att'd Att'd U� � plrill �hg ing �'"�P� P�Me P�n�,,.
�' ta Date _!8"Z. Mo�.th Year Year Hrs Hrs 2 Hrs I llrs � Ilrg y.. Hrs Z Hrs�-
Les�Y Nogck. Chie Iln lay �a8 XXX X� X 1( .--�$ A�mi
� � John Maczka+ ,Asst 1 { , `� �- 5) � X �j
�' � . Asat. �� � .
i.L
• �..
{ " ��gt. Jamie •Lerbs _ ..�?- _ �.L X r k
' Paul DreeiAn •• `fi 8 S X � '
� Mike Caonan ' (n � 5 .36 X
i Gard Sk'erven 4'Z $3 �'!v ` X X
I Ed A�rian i� a X x X
: � Pat Kni ht 8 ___$_� � J( ' i .
; Allen Valencou 5 -- '
, � ; Daniel Berrett � -- � X ' �
' Marc Connoll �j�_ 3 �_
i� _._..�.�_...._....�
, : �,z. r �-_, .-� : 13 � ; - ._ '
.- �'„' � Y ;
I � /`
�� � Steve Carlsan (,3 � � �
I wi l o � S` �
I Gear e Low�#' ' i o3 ' ){X � X
�, -•- • e rnnas g 3 p .— : r ; .
� .. Pete Vi ].ar 12� ' t — -- � li ' '� — ' __
' _..,..' }...� _�..
. �7?tr.�ef�.S. 4 X ' � �
} . • r-�enxg�Ncaack.. Ca . X___...__;._.3% ' ........ _ i
� _['.�rw 1�i Nw 1 aop 8 9 . �'i ,w il. � I�
� ;:. �� 9 s" ' Sa: —�► . � � �,
i
'ts ✓$ � X ' ' /� 1l
� . ack Jr. .1�!.� p. _.+._. 7 ! X �--- - ---• � --- - s . . ._ . .
�. Ted Husnik_.._. � "?? 4 -a �...,.— X X _ � � . ,
; ' Mi.ke Maczko � ' Q �t � „ ,i �( i ' ; ;
. �, . : _ : ` ; ; : �
` � ' � Capi. Ken Noack y ' ' �
1 .
� Tom Weinzettel S 3 '
� . � m Olund , y • , � �-. � `i � �( _ _,._ X� � ' _`. , �
�' Ll.L dkk0 i ti'3� ` � X ' �
�' ' Jim tcilbur � I b2- 5 � X i � �
�'" � • � ith Stein l � tC •
C '' Rand McNama�n � _ �
f ric c : i � D .� �• -
!' , ' . .... .._ _._ . _
; . # - - _ _ ,._„ .
�. �� �
�"' '� � Total Atte�ded a�. .._ a��_. ��S 4 y ,.. - �c�-•--••- —:��--
f •� __, Tot. Man Hours ,�_ ... 58 - :�g_ J.._..__ a$ I �
`' •� � T - M L M s��_Y�. C en s
_:,' $=2� - - _.. .�. :�
, ' Avez.MenPe Ru � " ��',�._._._ �`"!� ._.._ -- � -
;: Aver.x_�o�c.�e _�`�q.37 `I ,� _.._.___5�::oa_.._..___ _...___.._�_...._.._.___.�,__._.
_
, . .
:
, . 3-� �,r�.
�
0
PLANNING REPORT
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
85-30
Northland Land Company
Southeasterly Corner of
Northland Drive and Pilot
Knob Road (see sketch)
Division of Lot
1. The property in question consists of 187,308 square feet,
which equals 4.3 acres. The purpose of the division is
to create a site for the construction of a Marriott Hotel
(see application 85-30A). The site will consist of Lot 2
plus the westerly 72.8 feet of Lot 3. The attached sketch
indicates the location of Lots l, 2, and 3 as originally
platted at the southeast corner of Northland Drive and
Pilot Knob Road. Obviously, the purpose of the lot division
is simply to create and slightly larger lot to accommodate
the proposed motel. Lot 2, as originally platted, was proved
to be slightly smaller than is necessary to accommodate the
proposed motel facility. There is no adverse impact on the
land, streets, or utilities systems.
�
�
�
.��
NORTH
:i
;•:
G!
�
J
J
�
4� Q • ' �
i 1 � �
t t � i0�
�i ��
I � w
I I h— " � �
' ' � - •--,---� �' , �_ _r_ `+yt�_•
� ' � , � � ' ;� � � � ! � ''' ,1�(�` �
`, .
, � .
. .''
t `� � ..__L +� . � � i � ,..�'t
t 5 ' �� i, j � .' .'� ''�1
� L_...�.___..._'� .._ �� ' �r�� 'F"'
� � --_ -..
�� �
� ! 1 .' � +�
---� 'at i ------ `--- -------- ---- —__ --'----- _ _ _ _ � _ � ` �' �
. ' . ��
__ • (_"_ �` _.-..'.�- .__ _...1_. ����a ^ __ "...�= � _ -.._�_ y 'f r� ��%
_'_/ _
. F1ST1N�. fMK1�T/C.E
_�....�.. ut��l
_ t i
' ___ �`==4M1_�M1 —,..____.... .."� • �t % � I
�}p�� . " --.."_'�� �` � 1 I
1
� 'a ` �....,� -- - __ –^".�'----�'-- — --- i i
---^-----------------------------^�*--------^----------^----- ' .
'� � tl r �
� r�( ' i .
---- -------- —i----�-�--------------------------------- ------�''-�-�-'�-_'-"�r� _� EXISTtN6 S.T.HWY._110_--- - ---- ------------ -- "----- -� �
�� ---- - -----__
___ ___---, r-------------------------------------------------�.L'— --_____-------
i� }'i EX 33x39 f�nc CW✓EFiT ----------__----'----------�----'^ --^ ,-
♦-�'� �.1 ��. . .
�
'---�—�--_—. — — — -�H -..� �i pc6T�-� � �C�".
i �
�",,. � �j �� � '
� O ,v � ,
.. _ •'^�.._._ " » . � ~ ,0. �� v i 1
` I 1
.� ' . '�. �L�`V � �
h � �i �
�� �
�`��
r
RE"u1JNRECTK)q CEME"1`ERY
%-
/
\„'//
`�/
t T
v
BLK. / s
di
. � .i r _► . �'1'ilt'.11
C9
,
W
w
�
z BLK. 2
4
MH
26' ROADWAYS - FACE OF CURB T
- FACE QF CURB. 2C}' IS�AND
�s� �ce MH
R. C. P �TOR �
�
�
RESt�iRECTi4ti CfMETERY
. �
�
tJ �
t ,,,` 1 � � 4
AP�ON � �
�,
`�,� _; .�_------}------------;_ � ;
�
,. ---; : - -- ,
; ,.._-------- ---------- �
�. , -------- ---, ,
4 �
\ � J, t �
� � 1 1
� � �
1 i i �
! � �
1 7
�or � � ; GNB ; ;
,,
� , ; ,
� � � r
z �
� �
; � �
� � �
: -----^;: ----------j �_ . i �
r-- f r----;; --^
r-' � � i i
� � � I � � �
� " �------� � i----•— --•� �
X �
; �► cusa:x =as 1
i
Il f� "" ' . 1
!� �'� F � �
' � t j
� � � � ro��
� � � ; � TFN,MAO
� ? 'D � 1
' _1 1
----------------- �--------- ----- �---- -----
1ce MH
SEWER
2
��
.�
� u�uw��►N V '
�■M�IMttA/M0 �
=iMC_
, t'w.1 i M..ryd Lrw�..y � 1�..1 Twrry � Ir�/ �.r � LM/ h�.��y
■
C�rt iticat• of 8ur��y j
1
�
�
4�.nOMs {)1�'�
M7� M�.n� No M M(
Mr�ryyoM�, Mw�weY {Wb
So.n�Ofi�w �0�10
�.+nr.�r. Y+tiwM� �12�7
�
•
�
.
�
�
� � �s6 ,� `\ � �1 � 0 3 Z
, 9'Q6. 1 i�. c�, � LU
ti ' J%�'/� I cri z �
I ' ' `" ' �
� ,�;,r: � �
� .;
� ,
,
C�� J � , ,
.
�
��
:, i
*� �/�
„ �:
L
�
�S. E. te�nCr y�
Lof /7, 8/ock f .
o Q E-� ���� c�ro�. monvmenf B�crrr'n�s show� ort vssum�d
jna; �or/ o�'' [ol �7, Block I, V�c��Y v�Ew oAK� Dakolo Couhly, Minntso�d
occoro'��� /o lh� rtcord p/o/ /h�r<of ; y��g nbr�lh�ns/�tly cj'' fh� (dl�Owin de�cri6�d /in�:
e
$�Q�rn�n o1 /hP S'oulh�os� cb�n�r c�'ro,� Lof �1; �h�r�cP �orlhw�s cr l y � a d�slan�<
c,'' �c � ; �/ fo 0 o�nf on !h� ►vCsl�r/y /i�,� ^ so� Lo1 /7, �is�on� �2.00
'�e' �or�h PoS��r�y o�' th� eo�n�r comrr�on f� Cofs l� 4�d /7 �.'' sa�o'
t8;'�� �� 1, �alle� I/i�.v �b,� o�d �h�re f eririn o%i�q.
� 1.�..►y .•.�Il� rA�t �A1� b � �rw Mi eM��s1 r��MwN11�w •I • �w�w •I IA� ►N.Ir�s �l �►� �Mw
Mwrl►.I I�.I, �w� �I ►1�� IN�I{M �l.�ll ►v1111 MM»w� MJ �11 •IN �►���Aw����� 11 �wp� /��w �r w
»N 1..� •� ►�r�.�� � � /Al��l�f 1�► 11��A.�. 1��
,�.. � , . . _ �a�; susu�s N R� , iNc.
� • ��.... ...r...
�.�%�� 158 /S :s__� h
, Ho� rvN�a►W AI� Ryhi, nw.,,�d
`< \` �."„'i�l�llli!!!!!1 �
-�._ -.
�
a
�. � !'�' �.'� _ j. ��;
•. %r -f -- -
�' �
/
� /' �.i
��'� �� �
�% .�. _�.
. f ,;� -�t
. � � � -d�,�,�,� r' ___--
. �. IL"_...>-�;�'�.. � ,�w}, -
) �� � � 900
t ..� +/ / �
'�� � • �� � .����
� , .. -- . -- "" _� � '�--� _..�..
_ -A' � �- � a �
' - �� � -
'-- \, �A J
\ � /
` f �, i j ` ,.�
l..---� .�
' _ .� t ' `��{ i
.1 �..� ` � .... • ' �/^^w�` YGI ...s � � ���'" � ' .
�` l ' . � `'—_.._� —� �
� • , / ^ _.
' � � �"' "'' f ' � • � ` .. '
/ �.
�� ' ~�—.... �'`'� f ' ,/.
`. ' � �-'"' .
�r-- _ - --fi-�• `--� �- :.���/ , /� �
/� `�'',�. ��- i - ' �"�;',�' . , : r' %� -
,� v . ..� �� •,1 ,'/ / • ,�s ! ! � /.
.I � _ • c�'.�. �• '•: � . - �"►"'� , �, , - i .
' ` � •' �� � ,• '. � ' � ti `� --- „ i / , ' ; � � ;
' �, � � �� � - _. _ � : ; , / , .
�^-- ._ _" ^„� ` - � ' _'. �, .^ _ _.. .� 1 `' - ' � �J //� �/ ', • 1 t' ' , .
� r ' � � � � /�f/' � �
'~ �r �- � \ �' ' � / � !/ /
. . . ` �. �. + _ _ ,,,r `*.. � ..r ./ r , / � .
=--- _ ._ _ _ T��--.` -T—_ - .__,- --- � -- = =�-~- = f /%f ' � '/ � ` ' '
�� - ` ••"'"" , / �i; /
�� � � � , ..._ �. ..... _ _ ' . � '� r � f /1
%� ' ._ ;� . r,.I� �� _.-- �` � . - ' ~��—,`, ! � i r � .
� �f � ss� - � "_. - __._ ,... ._o� __...__. -----.._ � � � - _ � " ' , . 1
� f - � ` . - -- - . _ ... � - .� �� . , , � � . t
' ' :.,-.-: ; _ . -� --� $ ° . �� �� � � . � , - � .
♦' i Ln ' -- � \ • . ' �
� ' -"_- - - - � � 1 • �..�' , . .
_ _'�i � � _ _ _ ~--. - ,,, . � ``'~�_ � . ', �.' � �
,I l " �•"`���� ._.. ._...- � _ .-- Y ,�_ . --�_., ~� `\ / ` `; l�� , .�` �{, : % J!.
``,i1`�� , ` ' ' ; f. �-- . - _ • ` . ; � ` ., � � } ' ' ` � - - , � - .
.�;� 'S`i , - _,. .......- �' � ' _ ` --� � '` ' • \ � � � _ Y ' 'ti �„`✓ ~ � ,� ' _,.. - - - �- I � ' � ` . �
4 • � ,w/
/ ��/ �. �`` �`,� � `h. � � �� . a� �
�j / j�� �� r �' �"�, (j � � • i ,/� � � � f _ , . . . /
;' ,, . � /''� . � _ � \ , _ , -
- %, t ,i r 1 \, �� � ' t . � t ` . \ �• _ _. _ _ _ _ -- 1/
� � 1 �� 'r I �. (\,, � �' _ � � � � - � .,.. '"_ � -.. � -'�` _ - � �
' rj' j i t � \ � �,. � ' \ _
/ \ ' �/
• r,% , � ' � ir �Z a ,� a�i� \ ti � � . .
� ' �� � ; '� 1 \�-� r^' \ � �, \ � } � �,r„ +' r - ~ �
� / __ f , ...�_- �---- --• - �' t '\\\`�- , . � _.. . — �` - .__ _ _ _ _- __ __ _ ...._ \\. ..r.
r�� • i ti � � �\ ` ~ . � _ v \ ..»....._. . - -• - ...___ __ _
' ,,/ . • '
� -� I �. �// /a � � � -- _ _ _ _. � I
i
C
►
�
12"D.I.P.
APPROX. 1500' a
r�su�aEcraH co�a„
� .� ■ r.
� r
�' ��
_ /ti"i' - - . .
0
M
. a,
� � 1
��
1 ;
1�
� 1 '� I
' i i
� � �
_ �--'- � '
Ii� �,�� o�E �, _---- :`af ,
' �,0�`\N� NG � '� ' � � zi'
�
� ��5 ' �� '�
,� , j �
' �� ��
--------- ' .
------------- ' 'x�
-------- ------ % �LL1
� �_—�-----���,�.��L..�--__ _---_----- -'-------- � ' � .
t�,J �� '----------__--'"� � � �
V '� e �
---------- --- ------------------------ ------------- y' '- �_� --- , .'-1-1
--------- -----
-'^-'�------ '-- �r ------------------------------------------' ' "--""'
---'-------'�-------'�--- �---�-- � --'----'---------- --- ----- ------------"---�--- ------
�� GI.►. �
�
_'__-_-___-'_-"-_ -- ' __
_ _ , �
xr _
--
- ---------------------------- DCISTING S.T.FIWY. I10 - ---------- —> ,'�
_ -�------------- ----------- -------------------- -
� ;
-- �+ -
-------
- -------.�,--------- ---------------------------- ---- � ---------------------------- --
`'� �' ----- �+� ---------
�' -------
-- -----
8 V.C.P. SANITARY SEWER � ----------------------------�.,� -,'--------
�
�
m
S�,
P�
p�M
6
BLK. / s
•
.
, _.
— — — — — — - — — — — — — EX6TWG RIGMT-Ci-W� u � �— "�
— _ —�..
_ \ � � � ;
.�. P � ' '' ' /
- _ _ 12 D. I. P. WA RAl�A�Pi-- � �\ � 00�� °� � ; -
_ 1 ._ \� ���,�03... � �
�
� �
� \�\� � � � �6 ��
�� �o
' v. c� �� � � ;�� _ NE � �ZN
I ��0� � �, � - : - ���
s GJ . . =� — � pt
� . ,
3
4
2 �K. 2 �
8�� D.I.P. WATERMAIN
a
i
TION CEMETERY
2
_; "'""""'"""'""""'i
'' "" ' '
; '""�""_�"""""'�"".�
/,
i �
i �
I i
I �
1 �
LOT I � �
� �
�
� �
; GN8
�;
�,
r"-" ' ' ------- -"�
l'-' ��"'-'-'_'i
r-' � � �
� i ;
�
� ' L'_"'J .��' � �
1 �'��_i2
; �w �NG � TOi ------
� TERM
' ------------�-,---- - --_ �j=-'--�,_
I
Pl�n:
�����
�..
ra■
„
�.
' ' � � �� ' i �: I . - - � '�� � ' � ; �� � �` � � � �� � � `, � ��' �' ` ��' ' ` �� - ��� (�i�xn.h,e� 519�
, ,`, • � . _ _ . � i� : , ,• „ -- � -�, Z--�-
� . x . . ' \ ' w 1 . • �r ' - �. =� -_��'— � ..c e,
• . } _ i - � _ . • � , . -,��• _,., "=��_ - - .��s ?�t�
� � � _^_ -� '^�. �— .�._ 1 I � � � 1 1 � a � - � � / - , _ _ :� �1 — �� � � ��
-� ..
, e� . 1 /i ~ . � ' G' . I +y1 `o ', ' . 1 j� 4�'r � � � � _ �.-�. ���� -- --- -- -•
. , S ` t+/ ' . � ,/ ` � � '� �i� �
� . � � �� . � �,, , , � l 1� , �.; � , . �� , ( .�,��
�•( . • . . i .« , .. `• ' � ,Ir,i •i , , j. � / • ,_ / � �'� , �-,q � � �- � r r
e � •a� / I a� � ;y� �- . � (.~wtJ , �'1 �j � � •ti-
. . a � . � � � ! ' � j � . , � ` � ' �•: �%.e • r `�\ r ` � i. ` ' � I `.
J� � _ S I �i I ' t I .' � I s . , � ' J . �� J . - I
1• ,' _ ��� � �� �� "'��"� �'n / � � •�' � ' - �''' � � � - ' � S � • � `¢ ' � �
�<� �.% J 1�� r "�. ` � � �
. �; �. _. -..�_� i-- ' '� w �I •I•1117..; : � � • ' `+`. a / � `• ,• •.d' 1 �\ � � � - . . '
_ `` � � 1r ' ..��' �.�. �� "'p� "�'� •. + , J � � J� �� • •, , . . "` / � ( � . . ^." , ;�''T'.5`Sr ,�Al.`" , �... ..
` I f �'� ` •: • . + ' ` � � z �..�\" - ��'+r-.i-� � 1 i'
�r � • �l a. � � \. /� /i ��f. �9� •eY e� � s / � � 1 � i
} 3 a�. `� , � � I. ��, I W , , �� ,,�y� ',11h.� o ,/ � �.� __ � 4\\ ,� '�_ g. C
, _. �...�� . � _ ( , . , � i � i � � � � , _ � � i, e �
. � � °',,.�-- • . � � � , ' \+ � �/i � . � � '� \,:
�• �� � . '� � ••,� � 1 � I % i . � n '•i �' e�� •'� � � .
,1 • � � • i / J �' . 't . /'� � t�r S � 1 � • �t � � • r-r„'A
,� � , � ; , � 4 & " � � `. i. � ' ^ �� " y '`i � � � • ' k.. < '1 �\ �
� `� • �' • t� .` �. ' / y � �. •'. _ � ` •` �•� � , ,S!) `• . r � •► , 6• `� � � � �r � , \ •� ��+ ' .
� � , � � y � N / ` ,I' r{ ll�•-�
� ' 1 . y7�( 1, M1' � .� �• � ` ' � ♦ '
t J ` �• 1,�t1 � ' , ��/,•;\ ' �`..�a b ` ' \/ L,' �.`• � I
,b , � • ` ; i , '`, h �' ,y �, �' ,� � ' �� `� be7 • —_ -� e � ._ . : �� \ 's',�
, �. , � �� zl� �� .;.. � � : � .� ��� _. ,. � �/ � . -,
.� . � '• i . , �1 •. .,• •' �� r' �
� . • ' . . � `✓• ! \ i ' �� I • �� • �t' ,y . ' •�n. ` '1 / iK •L �, � ' .. ), , ���
' '`• \ • e• � ` a '?' • y. fl • ', S j � \ `.. ' � _ ` � , . . ' q /� • l � -`#� ; � �( . •\. �'�
, � 6: � !• � • i � / �;�, 1I .. - � `J �/ � i , . f' �D1
� ` � � /� � �F ,� � � t } � � • • � �-�` _ • � . • ` • •�v
J( •..✓ �/�e' ` ` .. ' .i ' �/'� �1�% �� � � •�,� f ,, J~. � �•^ �` ` , ` • • / • { •
I ,�" • 'y , ' . �=f / ��/ �..'�� � _ ��!�fj '� . � . f f ~ ` . � ;1 ��' ' � ( � ; �'�R, E E B �
I� � � 1 ` S1 „ _ ���' •�..� ��1 a �` �� . _ .._.�� ' �.� tt� �. �,� ` � . 1
� �. '- ' = � ___�'y i ��� �' `//� I� � �, � '�.�. �_�`_' � • • ✓ '�� . .... � �.. �1 •. � .
, , � _ � r ;/J . � . . . �. � . + s; �, � -� .J ��`�.
I /.'^ "..! r f. � � / R i / �� � �. ' ` � � , ! �7'F '�- � ...� . ..� '� -� 1 J b . �
� ./ �,�1��_� � '��i�''�'-�,�{�- •vry .�� �% i _ .l � ' •. �� �� ' �E ,1 � � �
/� ���.X(•T � � . � , � A�i %� ' : ���1 ' « � a /
I.' � � ' � � �` � s'` '�` � ..r �� �j � ` • t � \ \``� ..�/ ' 1 T ,'
` -�� �.;.f� i'x.. ' �' ,• 1. �"' _ 7. ! � �� ' /- ` 'I. � ' ` ;4t /� i
�B'lii • " 1,• , • . , t +, • . Y•
( �� yr:� ��%N`!^�r� � : r� .i ' „ .�• a• :�,n�. :� • � � � � j' • • _ ; / '��
1: � �� �►�. / /� / �
� " /� 'o ; '+ � _.. ,/' _.-----
� `, '/ «��ii.! �,`''� r��" ����. ' '', • ./ 1� ` ` � _ 1'\ -'r' '/,': ` �'� ' � �: ,:.j`-"� ` '` � •I, tir � / , a"
� .c ��` ` • I" � � � 1.. �i' � � :i/v,. . i'tc,s'�"�'• ` ��� �.��. .. �_ My��,\-• � ` ��� � a. , I 'e . k � .t / �
�, +"' A',�: ;, - - / �'b1�}�� ' `� , ' ��'�' /�''� � � `�,j� - .: .: . . -�.� .. - fi'� : i , " :'� , ,
%j'' , ,ci \, ' �:. ► �• i � ..-- \ /• � . � , '� �.1►' ,� • \.
� s } ��r- y � � �' /�% T• 1• .i
� i , � `;� � � �.'' `" / SGE� I� 11 • , :.� � / '' � , �,/ � / �J ' /
'� ���-�,,�'°""�,.�� a� '� �''��':: ; EsM'r� / `^ .�`1 � - `f'`., � , -m • '' ' /` _ . . °1m
� f �,,,u�� ,,�� , � � ; j ' . r.._ _. . - � ,' ; y `' .` • r
.•� � _T '�� E�il�1D �� �,�' i , �,.t..�t' , .��r�' � ,e \ � � . �
% � .�/ . ` � � � � i �°`f� ;, . : "� . . .
�l' � • . ' �,r,ay,y� � '� . � � � �' _'�� � � : �, 1 . • • . '1 : � � . � • � - � .
I 'µ ��.}�- , �, .�'� i �. y' _�'� °''i� I.Sir +�` , • �. � . ` � \• � - ••- ,'.
' ! 1 � ' . ^�' . isy �, ��� �� , � ,\ ` _- •' ��V
�1� � J i � « ;'^ ` ! 'i� �' , �- I . , - • , - .. -- __, .
�� �''� v� '� . .
� • • o • L .L*�! -^' 1 I °>y
{� � j ' �•.j� S�'" �-� �f ;"C'�.� : . • • ' i • . .
� ` ii ., � ;� �� ---' � ;:y %� � .. . •, � t . , d�
� 1 I_���, - �/ � . . ! �j? 1�L � . �i•.� � Pc• b'ly I , � .
� . • / � I . -i � —� � � . • M1 •
`1 � y`� � � / ' � 7' - ` �' 1 i� 1:� � 'it' � ee • ' ' • /
I ���J �
� , � � �+, , ;. �i-V�'' � , .
( I � �' y'� y � . M � r • ` n \ ��� �i�� � � • •` � � ; • � ..
I,, :-1 . , � ,%. i• j �/l.,'' �
. � '� % �" . : ��•
+ , � , � �. . /: .,, �..
1� 6••� � •� � � ' � • � ► � ` � � i �� � 1_ r i a" r .
d � � 5 I e•. -
B , � • � � , � {wT � , �: .
. Ij ,•' ;' , �
��; ;t� ; ' ,•' � � t ,� POND -•� - ' - - `ti.:� � t "� � e
��:� � � ��. ��� �r��ie�d
, �. :- . �� . . .- ,.� Co
�..�� -.� �-.:�-� . . , . M.,� . . , . pp : .� . ,.
,+`�� ', �n+ , ! • � .. • te, .� � �1 , • �
I
60099-009
nawibur' ,1 ,W
COPPERFIELD
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Copperfield Associates, a Minnesota general partnership, fee owner of the
following described property situated in the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, to wit:
That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 28 North, Range 23 West of the 4th Principal Meridian,
which lies northerly of a line described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the east line of said Northeast Quarter distant 1813.00 feet north from the southeast
corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence westerly, to a point on the west line of said Northeast Quarter
distant 1483.00 feet north from the southwest corner of said Northeast Quarter and said line there
terminating.
EXCEPT the north 330.00 feet of the east 800.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 36.
Also EXCEPT that part of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 36 described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the east line of said Northeast Quarter distant 330.00 feet south from the northeast
corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence westerly, parallel with the north line of said Northeast Quarter, a
distance of 800.00 feet; thence southerly, parallel with said east line a distance of 594.20 feet; thence
northeasterly, to a point on the east line of said Northeast Quarter distant 495.00 feet southerly from the
point of beginning; thence northerly, along said east line, a distance of 495 feet to the point of beginning.
That part of Outlot A, DELAWARE CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof which lies northerly of the
following described line and its westerly extension:
Beginning at a point on the east line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 28 North, Range 23 West
of the 4th Principal Meridian distant 1813.00 feet north from the southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter;
thence westerly, to a point on the west line of said Northeast Quarter distant 1483.00 feet north from the
southwest corner of said Northeast Quarter and said line there terminating.
Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as COPPERFIELD and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public for
public use forever the circle, the court, the drives, the lane, the roads, the park and the easements for drainage and
utility purposes and drainage purposes as shown on the plat.
In witness whereof said Copperfield Associates, a Minnesota general partnership, has caused these presents to be signed
by the proper officer of Tandem Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, a partner, this day of
19____, and by the proper officer of Lyman Lumber Company, a Minnesota corporation, a partner this day of
19
SIGNED:
COPPERFIELD ASSOCIATES
By: Tandem Corporation, a partner
By
Richard A. Putnam
By: Lyman Lumber Company, a partner
, vice president
By , assistant vice president
Stephen T. Ryan
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 19_, by
Richard A. Putnam, vice president of Tandem Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, a partner of Copperfield Associates, a
Minnesota general partnership, on behalf of the partnership.
Notary Public, Hennepin County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 19____, by
Stephen T. Ryan, assistant vice president of Lyman Lumber Company, a Minnesota corporation, a partner of Copperfield
Associates, a Minnesota general partnership, on behalf of the partnership.
Notary Public, Hennepin County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as COPPERFIELD; that this plat is
a correct representation of the survey; that all distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of a
foot; that all monuments have been correctly placed in the ground as shown; and that the outside boundary lines are
correctly designated on the plat.
Theodore D. Kemna
Land Surveyor, Minn. License No. 17006
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
Theodore D. Kemna, Land Surveyor, Minn. License No. 17006.
We do hereby certify that on the
approved this plat.
day of , 19 _ by
David B. Toenies
Notary Public, Hennepin County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires January 23, 1991
day of , 19 _ , the City Council of Mendota Heights, Minnesota,
Mayor , Clerk
Pursuant to Chapter 212, Laws of Minnesota, 1973, this plat has been approved this
day of , 19
Bernard H. Larson
Dakota County Surveyor
I hereby certify that the taxes for the year 19 for the land described on this plat as COPPERFIELD have been paid on
this day of , 19
No delinquent taxes due and transfer entered this
County Treasurer, Dakota County, Minnesota
day of , 19
Dakota County Auditor
Document Number
I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the office of the County Recorder for record on this day of
, 19 , at o'clock M , and was duly recorded in Book of on page
SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
ENGINEERS & SUAVE YORS
County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota
PRELIMINARY COP',;
SHEET I OF 3 SHEETS
60099-009
N
co
MATCH LINE
(See Sheet 3)
0
S6°19'58 "W
112.84_.
MATCH LINE
(See Sheer 3)
0
252.42
�_N D,
N
03
150.99
S0°35'45 "E
(-souTti �\
150.99_ ____J
N0°35'45"W
/50.99
30.00 `_...._.
30 00'
No°35'45"
80.54 I .. c.-177 61
-..1(0 54 �I L.19
4-14
O
O
0
U)
L
100.00
1
1
N
I U)I
1
100.00 _ _1
I
13
`.
N
to
°'
m
IN
/00.00
2
TREE 2111. c:2;7:68_
91.53 L79
LE -2 X8.9 \
I =6112°p6 \
NW corner or the An:. of Sec. 36,
T28, R.23 (Dakofo Co. Mon.)
1
96.00
752.06
N0°24'56"W
- 880.22
n.
COPPERFIELD
E line or the N11/4 and if J
line of fhe NE1/4 of Sec. 36
o Denotes 1/2 -inch x 14 -inch set- iron
pipe marked by license No. 17006
The north line of The Aleki or Sec. 36,
T 28, P.23 has on assumed bearing
of S89°2415"b✓
.-
s
d:q 585•26 C_165.05
0p Q°950.00
SCHOELL & M A D S O N,
ENGINEERS & SUR V
60 30
SCALE
IN
60 120
FEET
Drainage and utility easements are
shown thus:
f
1
r--5
Being 5 feet in width, unless other-
wise indicated, and adjoining lot
lines and being 10 feet in width,
unless otherwise indicated, and
adjoining right-of-way tines, as
shown on the map.
—1083-15
NO°24'56"W -'
SE corner or fhe NA%
and SW corner of fhe
NE corner of Sec. 36
RELIMIHARY COP"
INC.
EYORS
SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS
60099-009
N line or NC%4 0{, Sec. 361
355.77. r 9700:
589'24'/5"W
1857 79 -
645.21
r %45.00 `\ 2/0.77 ITh OUTLbT B
1 \ \ 41.93 Z. \ ry0 2L6
to \ N35°t139'1�i`..- /, .G°kA�
z\ R'
I \- 6 /
1 No\ t I6 p �/ 20' XO 2 0
orz0
01k m \2Oo .6 X000/$ D"
'al j 15 w� � \\ licit AO AS
Sri, \Q
1 \ \ 0=63°/048 // \` \�
I
2 \....5_1626,6,, / Nye
,G ,.#:, i
C=154•84 L'0
148' I D R
1fp.52•_111__
134.57
r__ ----r2. 110.08 54" ' i 1
/
I i I I 01
N\ /'%O° 1 13I �I
�/O/O I'n
' �i i� V'.�1
< 3 ,43.1 to ' y
/ i
40.00 <:.
(12.75
2/2.25
.\ -1 to
�.N. \\,S I I / 7
/ N N3 @S I I q� hq i/`/6
^VI ...,6.1„, \ 26'' 1 1 4=540 j %, \
it,
10(
//\ 2 c, 4,\\\ b•c- 1 R -60.00 -ems \17,.."" ,\
L..I
C/
GJ c:'.
pc
0$2 er_
01)
sr 01(91*
�rL C'A s a
j /���` / /'' Ps -.
I I oDt� O ..moo // / 2 0� //O0 /'
;17c.5 ' � 2�
*co 0 m (\ � 7 // X20 (b4 179'0^ / / 3
I 7 \ ,ry/ \ 13 ;3 / / ,yLryO o° Ni; / p 00
, �, e::;aR? / / mac' `° h ! ° / /96°
Da, • °� ��R 9s90 o o?s, / / 4 0 p°,%t` / /h�a �i
/ / O,o,,, O O, //
I / /' �Dc 4s3-)oSek'c- , Qg3 89 1 01 ` �C: 036,
/ / Co' ae e� ea\2 Q` /90 ......136. �I C'37 C ..----90 T7,
I0 O 01\z/
% / O VS, �\ ggo 00 ��� / 0 op• s 4
�� 00 3000 ; a{ 't;37 2•4
ISO / //O\ / /�C\ 656 rol-----C:5)* C.
1 z / /o�S 6 ///' °t/yes -i ... c�� S':
I ...J / /hot / / Os45" r r -� --__.t.,„ 4j4 3
//S / y l I 0;9823 6 RF�
l// / O°/ /(J�' 00 hC / / ' 045„ - CO
(/ G. t) 0\9 00 ino'� l l 6 pO ' ^ \ 3
`/ /o t� H 1 / o�•e s�
/ /Oh 0 4 / 4 /
I //6OS ^/r .�4 /
/
1 ...3 /// 1 06 Se rye �°/ iot ping' () 1//,Ne,
O 33.03 I CIr1e y / /� ‘h.^ mace \ /2 5
III o sourH 0/9 o .. % / 0. 4� 0);( // /0(11 06
oo
/ 1 / / 0 020 h° \6/
/ huh` o0 00� \/
N i /
/
coI
oW\ \ 0\-
���\ \\ 0119
co 0
R A D
4p
--
JI
-566.31 -
L>j40.- C5145.30
-21°O7'„ .31
5y0\x' q1S1813C p93661A:18°43'54"
=21°07'
26'
_ r-IB5
�.�
O
0
0
0
O
O
_N` 1
Drainage E'asemenht:
470.83 .....
• 1868.15 -
•N_ 582°191°9"W
0
SCHOELL & M A D S O N INC.
ENGINEERS & SUR \I E Y O R S
800.03
- 800.00 -
m
m
6
0
N
0
0
0
Cn
- NE corner or the NEI/4
of Sec. 36, T 28, P-23
(Dakota Co. Mon.)
60 30 0
SCALE
IN
60 120
FEET
Drainage and utility easements are
shown thus:
3
t
i
r-5
r--5
Being 5 feet in width, unless other-
wise indicated, and adjoining lot
lines and being 10 feet in width,
unless otherwise indicated, and
adjoining right-of-way lines, as
shown on the map.
o Deno/es 1/2 -inch x 14 -inch ser
iron pipe marked by license
No. 17006
The noriA line Of fie NC1/4 of
Sec 36, T28, Q.23 has on
assumed bearing of 589°2475"W
RV
se -corner of /he NE1/4
of Sec. 36, T 28, P.23
(Dakota Co. Mon.)
COPPERFIELD
SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS
()//13
58.2..27 3.2 w Gini)
S grayly W
21/ 68
BOUNDARY SURVEY
ROGER F RILEY
M I
a
-6°
/\
30
o'
£594''
.2055'2
5 6.6°57:3.2"W
(-o53S o/.t)
PAUL R. McLAGAN & SON
213 Dakota Avenue
WEST ST. PAUL, NINN. 55110.
Minnetota Repiaered I an.l Son -event
fart .1 O.. 112\859.2 to be vi Orted—.7
9 37/5
o p4_
o
of o° ESP,' / 4 b< �.n/ht
oil .. to Men doll Nevi is
cc ;
I� 1 —
Yr" Jan ;r/Y:10 -
—� . ,.,0.. 250
L1 M&
yo. ov -
1
N
at
O
0
2
30
-- 6 0
San. Se... er
F
C
t
SCO/e
Parcel Surveyed
Lot 8, Block 2, IVY FALLS WEST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof on file in the
office of the County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota.
Portion of Easement Document #28542 to be
Vacated by City of Mendota Heights
That part of the following described parcel:
A thirty (30) foot strip of land lying immediately adjacent to and Northerly of the following
described line:
Beginning at the Southeast corner of Lot seven (7), Vandall's Outlots, Dakota County, Minnesota,
thence West along the South line of said Lot seven (7), a distance of 475 feet, thence termi-
nating,
lying within Lot 8, Block 2, IVY FALLS WEST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof on
file in the office of the County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota.
That
file
(incl' =e2O feet
--- E"y
Proposed Utility Easement to be Granted
to the City of Mendota Heights to Replace
that part of Document #28542 to be Vacated
part of Lot 8, Block 2, IVY FALLS WEST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof on
in the office of the County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of said Lot 8; thence westerly along the south line of said
Lot 8 a distance of 40.00 feet; thence northerly, deflecting to the right 90°00'00" a distance
of 20.00 feet; thence easterly, parallel with said south line 37.15 feet to the east line of
said Lot 8; thence southeasterly, along said east line 20.20 feet to the point of beginning
and there terminating.
I hereby certify to Title Insurance Company of Minnesota that this is a correct survey of the
parcel described hereon and shows the location of those easements referred to in that Commitment
For Title Insurance issued by Title Insurance Company of Minnesota, dated August 29, 1985
(Application No. 24513) (except for Doc. #73434 which was not provided to me by Dakota County
Abstract Co.), all buildings and structures visible on said parcel; that there are no visible
encroachments onto adjoining properties, streets, or alleys by any of said buildings or structures,
that there are no visible right-of-ways or easements on said described parcel other than shown
or noted hereon; that there are no party walls or visible encroachments on said described parcel
by buildings, structures, or other improvements situated on adjoining property except as shown
on said plat of survey.
6.
447
Paul JGinley, Land Surveyor
Minn.' Registration No. 16099
FIRST
y-293, 'of Lor?---
(jsed Via.. intent .f des«iptt..
---399.38---
9/528---
AV E.
So Line Lot 7 Vnda//i Ovf/ots
(per Ivy A//s West Add t..a
97500 -----
SE Cor Lot 7
✓ane%//s Oot/ots
(per Ivy Fa//. West Add)
Date:/YOPPIr,Uer
o Indicates iron found, Reg. No. 9018
•Indicates iron found, Reg. No. 3959
I ht reby certify that this survey, plan, or report
wa! prepared by me or under my direct supers
visi )n and that I am a duly Registered Land
Surieyor under the laws of the State of Minne•
sot,. o
Dat: A/o r. /YIPS Rea. No /6 off
\
\ 'c,d
I
00
Z
D
{ c
L
/
/
/
/
/
A''&oc.
PZ-oroe 1, jai rat rt 4r4
° rrah' =
COMMISSION NO. REVISION
DRAWN
CHECKED
t Y
DATE
I hereby certify that this plan, specification,
or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly Regis-
tered Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
Date Registration No
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
17—
/" 1 /
//
/ /
// //
/ /
/
/ I
YOUNG & WILZ ARCHITECTS, Ltd.
119 NORTH 4th STREET/SUITE 409
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
"J'S 9101. 1"1008a38 Z
-• W V
'tea
0-4c
9Qz
r 1171
2
W
m
r
0
O
33
v
m
D
33
z
G)
00
r
v
z
0)
ONINBVd 30V89 MO138
co
D
w
I
D
W
r
a
CO
CO
co
03
03
03
-I
CD
0
(D
G)
N
CD
0
0
W
03
D
CO
03
03
03
r
a
1
Co
O 0
O 0
0
U
" .„\\e\)
0
r
co
3 wooipeg
03
CDa
O
O
3
1
COMMISSION NO. REVISION
03
Po
C)
0
DRAWN
CHECKED
DATE
D
03
03
co
ml
03
I hereby certify that this plan, specification,
or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly Regis-
tered Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
Date Registration No.
Cl) r
-► a
W
03
l
03
D
O v
O 0
r
0
li
wooapa8
YOUNG & WILZ ARCHITECTS, Ltd.
119 NORTH 4th STREET/SUITE 409
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
03
0
O
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ASSOC.
1324€
It
0
H
r1 LJ
H
II
Fl
H iH
--- r
LI
In
N
H I l H
H H F 1
-II
O
m
7
a
H E
I
P H
H
HID
Pi
i r 1-H
f=-1
H
H H
ll
�I
COMMISSION NO. REVISION
DRAWN
CHECKED
DATE
// C
I hereby certify that this plan, specification,
or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly Regis-
tered Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
Date Registration No.
Er E
a E E
H -11-
L !
r
Ci
R
Li
crn
HF
0i
H
B
J
YOUNG & WILZ ARCHITECTS, Ltd.
119 NORTH 4th STREET/SUITE 409
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ASSOC.
COMMISSION NO. REVISION
DRAWN
CHECKED
DATE
HOII, v\Tr
0
I hereby certify that this plan, specification,
or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly Regis-
tered Architect under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
Date Registration No
4c;i1vn1l ti -Hot --1 0
U
71.1
t`
YOUNG & WILZ ARCHITECTS, Ltd.
119 NORTH 4th STREET/SUITE 409
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ASSOC.