The URL can be used to link to this page

1985-10-15� CITY OI' MEND4T1� HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESO'CA AGENDA pCTUBEft 1S, 1985 - 7:30 P.M. l. Ca22 to Order. - 7:�� 2, Roll CaII. -- �� f ��" T 3. Agenda Adaptian. �-- � .��.� ,,� . 4. Approval of Minutes, October lst. -� 5. Consent Calendar .�� : � a. b. c. d. e. f. g• h. i. c ,.,�if}'��'t� Acknowledgement of September 18th N17C-4 minutes. Acknowledgement af Fnema relative to Homart Office Development in Bloomingtan. Acicnowledgement oE Treasurer's rnonthly report for September. Acknawledgement o� September lOth Park and Recreation Commission minutes. Acknowledgement of Fire Department month2y report for September. Approval of Madifa.ed CAO Site Plan Review. Agpraval of Final Payment for Evergreen Knoll (Resolutian No. 85-$I}, Approval of the List o� Claims. Approvai of the List of Licenses. End of Consent Calendar Public CammenCs -l� � HEt'�EtTNGS ,� Re olut'��ns� �o. S' 2: � tes -- 7:30 P.M. t y *socia __._ a. IR Bon ItevernTe He�rings��-$�r �5o�r4'e<� �Ot$�_�e�� ts As :, �„%i�-�:x�f ��c:��'�,� � / a .// a .�, l�- ��: �'� , �,=�" b. Case No. 85-23, Tandem Development, Application for Rezoning, CUP for PUD, and Pr li inary P1at. 8:00 P. .{Resa u�` No. $S� �d r i ance No. 217). ( . ✓� • .�oi.�/ G;�.�,� �°' _--__-� ,� ,� .,c,� C v� � . Un��.nished and �;ew �3usi��ess � �`��""� a. �fendota Heights Road t��<�term<�in �1ss�s�ments.�/{Resolution No. $5-i37} 9` �S"�g� b. Police Sergeai�t Pramoti.onal Exam. �-- � y� c. Computer Study, Pir. �1cCauley taill be pres�nt. d. youCh East Area Comprehensive Plr�n e iment .-%d'� ,��J�.�;�� e. ��ppointment oi Utility Leadm�n. --, ,� .r f. Approval of Mendot�� Police Contrac . - �'��.�,�;,,_ g. Mall of Americ /Fantasyworld - Met Council Review. �_ d� , �,. h! w� c y l�7h� � ��`"� � ��'�� f" �C %��.�2�=. „�� .,,._ Council Comments -"'�`"°�r / 10. Response to Counci.l Comments � a. Lexington Avenue I3ike Trail ;.� '�-��---*'-�—o� oo .._.�o��.. _��.1 ( 0 4, ck�,�,! ,� : �cu �.�., — ��;. h ?�� 11. Adjourn. � � ' . �� G��j�'� �C.c..' ..,_.. �` ��,�� - ,.��, �� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED PROJECT AND THE ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 474, AS AMENDED CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, will meet on November 5, 1985, at 7:45 o'clock p.m., at the City Hall, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on a proposal that the City issue revenue bonds, in one or more series, under the Municipal Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended, in order to finance the cost of a project. The proposed project will consist of the acquisition of land located at 750 Highway 110, Mendota Heights, Minnesota (being a part of Lot 2, Block l, Mendota Plaza, Dakota County, Minnesota), and the construction and equipping thereon by a general partnership to be formed, one of the general partners of which will be Health Resources, Inc., of an approximately 5,000 square foot family practice physician's clinic. The project will be located in the City of Mendota Heights, State of Minnesota. The estimated total amount of the proposed bond issue is $750,000.00. Such principal amount and interest thereon shall be payable by the City solely from the revenue pledged to the payment thereof, except that such bonds may be secured by a mortgage or other encumbrance on the project. No holder of any such bond shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the bonds or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment against any property of the City except the project. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Department of Energy and Economic Development of the State of Minnesota for approval of the project, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection at the office of the City Clerk between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M. All person interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set forth above. Dated: October 2, 1985. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL By �"i�ce,,.J `�l�� .�i��>_____ C ty C 1 e�—� :•, EQUIPMENT LIST ' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 8Q0 MHz TWO-WAY RADIO SYSTEM � August 1985 Item # Item Miodel l. 8ase Repeater FX-1175 2. Ouplexer DB-409Q 3. Antenna PD-1136 3,a Antenna UP-1167 4. Trans iine LLF�8 4.a Trans Line LDF 12 5. DC control panel for repeater 6. Install Items 1, 2, 3, 4& 5 **7. Three remote control units at PW Garage 8. Install Item � including hook--up af averhead spea kers 9. Supp]y and install a 5 pair cantrol line to the base station **10. Two remote control units at City Hall **Il. Install item 10 to a single telephone controi line 12. Supply 12 mobile radios @$903.2$ 13. Install 12 mobile radios @�70 14. Supply I2 Maxrad antennas @�28.75 15. Install 12 antennas @ $5.00 16. Remove 12 existing radios @$10.Q0 17. Final Inspection: 5 hours Technician time ** Also see alternatives �a, 10a, lla. Price $ 6 ,500 .00 � 328.Q0 1�241.65 319.20 1,583.65 b4b.4$ 42s.aa 1,475.00 I,4$5.00 Price Basis 8id � Bid Quote Quote Quaie Quote Quote � ��j e 30a.a0 Quate 642.50 Quote ��a.�� Quote 150.00 $ 1Q,839.36 $ 840.00 $ 345.00 $ 50.00 $ 120.Q4 $ 200.00 7ota1 Cast � $ 28 590.84 S i g ned �.-�!�--�'� !� , D�te October 4, 1985 Company Communica ir�nG ranrQr Quate Coamaunications Center Alternatives Sheet Alternative 7A. 3 1DA 29-10 Desk Set Remotes �� $ . �� $0�.00 Alternative 1QA 1 Midland 70-949 base statian with DC remote panel and desk set remote, PD-1612 800 Mhz Antenna, LDF �" Helix Cable $ 2 ,120 . 00 ' �� t � Alternative lIA. 1 InstaiZation of l0A To.ta1 Cost of System with alternatives 7A, l0A and II A Included $ 250.00 $ 29,OI7.$4 � .;�.� _ . � City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWERS, WATER, STORM SEWERS, STREET AND LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE YORKTON CENTRE POINTE SOUTH SUBDIVISION AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT N0. 84, PROJECT N0. 4) TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, deems it necessary and desirable to consider construction of the improvements hereinafter described. NOW THEREFORE, notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights will hold a public hearing on said improvements at the following time and place within the said City: Date and Time: Tuesday, December 3, 1985 7:45 o`clock P.M. Location: Mendota Heights City Hall 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 The general nature of the improvement is: The construction of an extension to the City's sanitary sewer system, lift station, and force main including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acquisition of easements, and the reconstruction where ��:==> necessary of street and easements in the area hereinafter more particu- larly described. The construction of a storm sewer system including appurtenances and incidentals thereto and the acquisition of easements, in and for ��> the area hereinafter more particularly described. - The construction of an extension to the City's water distribution system including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acqui- sition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets and easements in the area hereinafter more particularly described. The construction of street improvements consisting of the acquisi- tion of easements and the grading, stabilization, drainage and bitumi- nous surfacing, and the construction of concrete curbs and gutters on the streets to be situated in the area hereinafter more particularly described. The construction of a street light system including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, in the area hereinafter more particularly des- cribed. � The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is situated within the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota, and is owned by : Yorkton, Ltd. and GNB, and more particularly described as follows: Land abutting the west right-of-way line of Lexington Avenue, and �he south right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway 110 and lying north and east of the Resurrection Cemetery plats No. 63400 and 63401, and the south portion of the Trunk Highway 110�right-of-way designated for frontage road commencing 3700 feet west of Lexirigton Avenue. .�, The total estimated cost of each of said improvements is as follows: Sanitary Sewers Water Storm Sewers City Street Improvements Frontage Road Construction Street Lights TOTAL $ 267,150 274,200 188,750 234,400 237,000 33,600 $1,235,100 It is proposed to assess every lot, piece or parcel of land benefited by said improvements whether abutting thereon or not, based upon benefits received without regard to cash valuation. Persons desiring to be heard with reference to the proposed improvements should be present at this hearing. This Council proposes to proceed under and pursuant to the authority granted by Chapter 429 of the Minnesota Statutes. Dated this 6th day of October, 1985. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk City of Mendota Heights 0 G � � • CITY Or MENDOTA HGIGHTS MEMO T0: -Mayar and CiCy Cauncil La /� �_ FROM; Kevin D . Fr � �L.L ,�� ,� City Admi��rator Uctober 7, 1985 SUBJECT: Notice of Metropolit<1n Significance Review on Ma11 of America/Fantasyworld As an adjacent City government, the Metrapolitan Council has served upon us the attached natice that they are carnmencing a Metrapalitan Significance Iteview for the Mall pf America/I'antasyworld proposal for the ald Metropolitan Stadiucn site in Bloomingtan. The notice includes an indication that OcCober 17th is the deadline for submission of preliminary statements by interested parties. Therefoxe, the matter is on your agenda for October 15th. I served as a parC of the AMM Task Farce which studied the proposed Metropolitan Significance Review by the Met Cauncil. The A.i�"I was generally suppartive of that effort, and I personally am satisfied that they are addressing the public poli.cy issues that would be of concern ta us. However, if Council has any other thoughts tha� should be offered as a preliminary statement to the Council., I wou7.d be happy to pass those on. Please note �hat we would have the oppor�unity to have input at the public hearing an the Metrapolitan Significance Review, once it is completed. ACTION REQEJIRED To consider whether Council wishes to offer any further preliminary statemen�s. I�F: rnadlr attachment ,` . � - �l�_� '�. ��l l�� 1 ��` September 30, 1985 Kevin D. Frazell, Administrator City of Mendota Heights 750 S. Plaza Dr. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 ' �'- PviEfr��olitcan Cc��.� �cii 300 Meiro Square Buil�iing Sev�nth and Rok�crt Strec�is Si. Paut, Minnesola 55101 RE: Metropolitan Significance Review Mall of America and Fantasyworld, City of Bloomington Dear Mr. Frazell: Upon resolution of the Metropolitan Council, a metropolitan significance review of the above matter has been commenced. Enclosed and served upon you by mail is the notice and order commencing review. Sincerely yours, ' � / /. ,�"� :i I • .� ,� "'1'� 5 � � ' �t" -- . ' � Sandra S. Gardebring, Chair SSG: jb Enclosure A� EC�u01 U(7��Ortunit; [ rr��t�>>�(�r iet�j��iione (b1?) ?.91 C �� ;.;. , . ;:� ;, � STATE OF MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Proposed Amendments to Minn. Rules Parts 7010.0100 - 7010.0700, State NOTICE OF HEARING Noise Standards Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held in the above-entitled matter at St. John's Lutheran Church, 4900 Nicollet Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55409, commencing at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, November 19, 1985, and continuing in an evening session at the same location starting at 7:00 p.m.; and at the St. Louis County Boardroom, Courthouse Building, Third Floor, Sth Avenue West, Duluth, Minnesota 55802, commencing at � 9:00 a.m, on Thursday, November 21, 1985, and continuinq in an evening session at the same location starting at 7:00 p.m. Additional days of hearing will be scheduled, if necessary. All interested or affected persons will have an opportunity to . participate by submitting either oral or written data, statements, or arguments. Statements or briefs may be submitted without appearing at the hearing. This matter will be heard by Administrative Law Judge Allan Klein, Office of Administrative Hearings, 400 Summit Bank euilding, 310 Fourth Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415, (612) 341-7609. The rule hearing procedure is governed Minn. Stat. S§14.14 to 14.20 (1984) and by the rules of the Office of Administrative Hearings, Minn. Rules Parts 1400.0200 1400.1200 (1983). Questions concerning the rule hearing procedure should contact the Administrative Law Judge at the address and telephone number stated above. The subject of the hearing will be the proposed amendments rules establishing State Noise Standards. The proposed rule amendments are authorized by Minn. Stat. 5116.07, subds. 2 an t1984). A copy of the proposed rule amendments is enclosed. free copy of the rule amendments is available on request by contacting: � David Kelso Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 1935 West County Road B-2 ` Roseville, Minnesota 55113 � '� Telephone: (612) 296-7372 by to to d 4 One Notice is hereby given that a Statement of Need and Reasonableness is now available for review at the Agency offices and at the Office of Administrative Hearings. The Statement of Need and Reasonableness includes a summary of all the evidence and argument which the Agency anticipates presenting at the hearing justifying both the need for and the reasonableness of the proposed rule amendments. Copies of the Statement of Need and Reasonableness may be reviewed at the Agency or the Office of � -2- Administrative Hearings and copies may be obtained from the Office of Administrative Hearings at the cost of reproduction. Any person may present his or her views on the proposed rule amendments in one or more of following ways: by submitting written data to the Administrative Law Judge at any time before the close of the hearing; by submitting oral or written data at the hearing; and by submitting written data to the Administrative � Law Judge during the comment period following the hearing. The comment period will be not less than five working days after the public hearing.ends. The comment period may be extended for a . longer period not to exceed 20 calendar days if ordered by,`the Administrative Law Judge at the hearing. The written material '`•`� received during the comment period shall be available for review at the Office of Administrative Hearings. Within three business days after the expiration of the comment period, the Agency and interested persons may respond in writing to any new information received during the comment period; however, no additional evidence may be submitted during this three=day period. The Agency requests that any person submitting written views or data to the Administrative Law Judge prior to the hearing or • during the comment period also submit a copy of the written data 5 ;-. to David Kelso at the address stated above. The proposed rule amendments may be modified if the data and views received during the hearing process warrant modification and the modification does not result in a substantial change in the proposed amendments. '• � Any person may request notification of the date on which the Administrative Law Judge's report will be available, after which date the Agency may not take any final action on the;rules for a period of five working days. If you desire'to be so notified, you may so indicate at the hearing. After the hearing, you'��may request notification by sending a written request to the Administrative Law Judge. Any person may request notification of ' the date on which the rules were adopted and filed with the Secretary of State. The notice must be mailed on the same day that the rules are filed. If you wamt to be so notified you may so indicate at the hearinq or send a request in writing to the Agency at any time prior to the filing of the rules with the Secretary of State. � J You are hereby advised, pursuant to Minn. Stat. S14.115�` 1984), "Small business considerations in rulemaking," that while the rules as a whole may have an impact on small business, the amendments which are being proposed at this time do not change �' -3- the impacts which-the existing rules may have on small businesses. Please be advised that Minn. Stat. ch, l0A requires each lobbyist to register with the State Ethical Practices Board within five days after he or she commences lobbying. A lobbyist is defined in Minn. Stat. �10A.01, subd. 11 (1984) as any individual: (a) Engaged for pay or other consideration, or authorized by another individual or association to spend money, who spends more than five hours in any month or more than $250, not including his own travel expenses and membership dues, in any year, for the purpose of attempting to influence legislative or administrative action by communicating or urging others to communicate with public officials; or (b) Who spends more than $250 not including his own traveling expenses and membership dues, in any year for the purpose of attempting to influence legislative or administrative action by communicating or urging others to communicate with public officials. The statute contains certain exceptions. Questions should be directed to the Ethical Practices Board, 41 State Office Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155, telephone (612) 296-5615. Dated: October 7, 1985 � �HOMAS J. KALI OWSKI Executive Director • � � 0 CITY Ol� MEN�OT71 EiEIGIfTS MEMO October 8, 1985 �/,/ � T0: Mayor, City Council and City Adm'�h�Cst�.a�to� � FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets/Final Payment Evergreen Knoll Job No. 8313 Improvement No. 83, Project No. 4 DISCUSSION: The Evergreen Knoll improvement project which was started in 1984 is now completed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Council accept the project and approv� the final payment. ACTION REQUIRED: . If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, a motion should be passed to adopt Resolution No. 85- , RESOLUTION ACCEPTING [40RK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYNIENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 33, PROJECT NO. 4. 1.��' �'] ,:iJ;S'_i(''i.<, . :�d�' ,� .., }.C1'"i'� �;f:U'l;.Y �i i;;«. . � i ;�, s`:i . `t : ili`� , i. � — ,c!;;j{sj , „"i ,:� .:�'1''.�iC ��:1i<�: . �' ;�'''tC}4' �:Vj(Y Fri�`AL PAx'��a{"', :'} t',�'R�i�'i:MF'P:�" �:,.. f�.`.�, i�R�t.T�'�T �VO. 4 ivH��:I;tt�, �ursuant �c ,� 1�; �;.t_r w r_ ��tr��ct ��.z.�,1 ...!.:: L'sie C�.ty Qf rier,{'«ryLu Heights on July 1�}, ?�;��.. J,-�s„ h Sons, '� -.:,; ;i. E'�z�;l, Min7lesota, n�s sa�i;:factor:i.ly cc�mpic�t�ef3 t.��e� xt�;p�s;vemei�` ;:i r�:r.�"aty sek�er extensiU:t, storn s�Wer extensic�n, tra�c�zr;n'�> �: � e�t�.ion, sLr��t ,�.,;-'� <�..0 giatter im�:c��c;�u3nts - to serve tY�e area l:nr.•�;�F .., i'ti�:-r;.`��r� Krio;1 +; :<r,r� .,;�,,t..•�4 �io. $3, Pr<�jc:ct No. r �F) in accordanc� w� ' �? -„:.:"t; � ty• �.� . ��:t . . . N��' TfIFFcEFOKE IT IS ��Is�;I�'.;t i�r',�Gr�t'i,D by t.t.� ,:i� .; 7iXn�.i1 flf t�I.e r7 ty o� �ten�Qta Heights Lha+� t.h� ti.�.r:c cor.;.ls�teui trz�;�far ;,��c� c�ni:ract is he�•e�y ac— c�p�eci and approved; and � !�E I`i FURZ`HER RESO?.l;'J ti�K�:. -.�s,•� ;�� c�r• �c:�� ' �. _ � ' ? �rk ar� �ierefiiy ci5 re�.ted to �:i.i:it' � �iI'G�P.Z' OZ'�� i:f1i �.i.•" ��_ Tc:..: �}�VijF:�'.� i.:,? ` :_,t �C?�Iu�SCt: IT1 �..�tf' c12tiO?iitt, c`a� ��}itir�.t)�, �:�ic.lil� ��E; s:.C�F+u1'.',''?"?i`� 7't?CE�i�'; :ti i:__ t. �'.`;``j:�r� u,"�� .�]E'`. C.li.�1 �.+OUIl(.'.S �,�. ��"'.' .�i7.�:v ;aC "i..il�:.��. � .�2�.'l{n.ai1�S t..ri],S �S�.i7 tScaj ..lf , , :;c : p L��jS, �ai.��t {f}l'Y�,i�; C' � :� ';, f:�'" ",��:�}i 1�►'A �lE;'�if`Ca { �`':r` __ _ ` ..� _..___ ..,�_ i�:�s,e��l�'r. I.<,cl�w�t�cl, P'�,�csr �,TTr�'f : hc�l:Etl�c�R Ri, ^�U=:3nSai'�, �,i..� i i ::>i�, , 0 ,. . - , ., r � • �-.�� _ . . �'� . CITY OF MENDOTA'HEIGHTS € � � P n . PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION ' , � MINUTES . • October 8, 1985 0 :� The regular meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission was called�by order by Chairman Ste°in at_7:30 P.M., on October 8, 1985, in the City Hall Couneil Room. The following members were present: Stein, Damberg, Doff ing, Knittig, Leffert, and Schneeman.. Singer was absent. �Also present were Public Works Director,Jim Danielson, Recreation Director'Dewey Selander, Park Leadman Terry Blum and Barry Warner and Mary Ordal of Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. ' , APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of the September 10 meeting were approved as submitted.' . , ! , .. � TANDEM CORPORATION Mr. Richard Putnam of the Tandem Corpora•tion gave a''presentation concerning a proposed plan and preliminary plat of Mendota � Farms development. This is a 137 acre area consisting of 180 single family lots. • ' , � �, Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 Schneeman moved, seconded by Damberg, to table consideration of this proposal until the consul'tants working on the�Comprehen- sive Park Study have had a chance to study the issue. It was also recommended to ask the City Council to take no action concerning dedication of park land or the area around tlie ponds of this property until the Commission has had the opportunity to consult with their consultants and to provide a recommendation to the Citv Council. MEND-EAGAN Mr. George Heatherington, President of Mend-Eagan Athletic Association, along with Norman Gellerman, made a presentation concerning cooperation between Mendota Heights Park and Rec- reation Commission and the Mend-Eagan Athletic Association. They pointed out that there are 340 family memberships from Mendota Heights out of their total membership of 450 families (approximately 757). They outlined some of their needs: l. A lighted 90 foot baseball field. 2. Permanent homeplates and bases for ball fields. 3. Upgrading of present softball fields. 4.�•Use of outdoor hockey rinks. 5. Outdoor basketball courts (half-court size). 6. A storage facility. 7. One football field. 8. One lighted field at Wentworth Park. October 8, 1985 Park and Rec Minutes Page Two COMPREHENSIVE PARK Barry Warner and Mary Ordal were present to update the member: STUDY on the progress of the Camprehensive Park Study being dane by their firm, Barton-Aschman, Inc, They presented an overview and demographics highlighting the community growth which � included hackgzound informatzon. •They then pr�sented a review of our current inventory of parks which included an evaluation of each parks character, physical features, facilities, and adjacent land uses. The comrnission then heard a review of park and recreation programs and condztions in adjoining cities and towns to Mendota Heights, The last itiem presented was an evaluatian af park needs which included an analysis of the area of service for each park. WACHTLER PROPERTY RECREATION REPORT Chairman Stein brought the cammissian up to date on the Wachtler property negotiations which are on-going. Due Co the lateness of the haur, f ive items on the agenda were tabled for discussian at a later date. They were: l. A discussian with Art Seaberg regarding the Minneapolis bike Crail system. 2. The memo regarding the Marie Avenue pond. 3. Distribution of the financial statements. 4. Revised park survey responses. S. Discussion of the Public Works budgeC. Dewey Selander, Recreation Director, said he is in the process af hiring ice rink attendants. He s�ated that an ad was to be placed in the City Newsletter. OTHER BUSINESS Doffing moved, secanded by Schneeman that the park contribution for the Yorktan project be 5� of the fair market value af the developable Iand. Ayes: 6 Nays: d COUNCiL REP. MISCELLANE4US � � • 1� Leffert w311 attend the October 15th City Cauncil meeting. The next meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission will be Tuesday, November 12, 19$5. There being no further business to come before the Camm3.ssion, the meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Robert Leffert, Secretary ' Mithavt limtting the generality a.f the foregoing, dema�da for paliFe services '� � . . , . � �ill be resgonded ta first on the basis of the urgency thereof� and second in zh� order af receipt thereof, vithout regard to vhether the locatian of the de�anded palice serv��ey is vithin the�°territorial limits of Mendota Heights, '�endata or ather areas wiCh respect [o uhich Mendota Heights furnishes police services. Hovever, upon receipt of a demand far police services within the territorial limits af Mendota the Police Department of Mendota Heights shall be oblfgated to dispatch only such personnel and equipment as, in the opinion of the officer in charge, may be available after provisian for actual demands for police services withir� the tetritoria2 limits of Mendota Heights. In addition, the officer ir► charge may recal2 or reassign personnel and equipment then responding to a de�and for police services within the territoriai limits af '"��aata in the event that such recall or reassignment shall} in such officer's opinian, be necessitated by the actua2 need for police services within the territorial limits of '{enda[a Heights. 2. Pa�nent. Mendota shall pay Co Mendota Heights for such police services �he tocal af: Thirty Four Thousand and Nine Hundred ��ve Dollars {$34,912). rpYTrycnt Rhall ba mndr. manthly. t+iChin ten {ZQ) dnyx Afte�r �acctl.�st of a otaCo- "�°�it< cltn{'afayt'a. tf t�aqi�{t,iid ttelghGn atial.l YgC�!iva., 1'93iCt+ ��aE¢ Ai�i 1�y t'��ee�rtt �l 1"'+�"t,atr�� Qt esrrvl�a�c unciar nnd purnuant ta tliim Agceement, poyA+cnee► by `tendota to Mendota Heights ahall be reduced by the amount of such aid actually received by '`t��dota Heights. .' , 3• Ind enni.fication and Release. Mendota shall indemnify and hold Mendota Heights harnlesa from and against all claims, causes of action, damages� liabilities costs :�n� expense, including attorneys' fees, which may be asserCed against or incurred by Mendota Heights as a xesult of the acts or amissions of Mendota its ., a��nzS. servants, representatives. or employees, or as a resul�t of the negligent accs or omissions of the Hendota Heights Police Department� its agents, servants, representatives or employees in furnishing, failing to furnish ar delay Sn furnishing pol,ice services ta the extent that such negligent acts or omissians + are not covered by insurance obtained by Mendata HeighLs; provided that Mendota . � a� POLICE SERUICE ACREEMENT in�� xL �-wMl, made a�d en�er�a intv efLective as of the l�t day of January � ,1986 � by and betveen the City af Mendota Heights (hereinafter "Mendota Heights") and the City of Mendota (hereinafCer "`lendata ") fs made vith reference to the following recital.s: RECITALS FIRST: Mendota desires to cantract with Mendota Heights for the furnishing of police services by �tendata Heights within the territorial li.mits of Mendata . SECO;�'D: Kinnesota Statutes Section 471.59, as ammended, authorizes Mendata and Hendota Heights ta enter into ari agreement providing for provision of such palice services. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the foregoing Recitals, and in cansideration af the teras and conditions hereinafter.contained� IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Provision of Palice Services,, Subject ta aIl the terms and conditions herein conCained, Mendota Heights, ttxraugh its Palice Department, shal3 provide cuency-four (24) hour general police services Eor Mendota , including, buC not linfced to, the enforcem ent of Mendota ordinarrces and the statutes of the State of :iinnesota. The scope, extent, and every ather aspect of such services� including the manner and method of provision thereof, shall be determined by �he Police Department of Mendota Heigtits, in its sole discretion. All personnel providing such.palice services to 'iendota shall be under the exciusive direction and cantrol of the Police Department.of Mendota Heights, and all books, records and reparts, generated in connection wi�th such police services shall.be kept and �saintained only at the offices af, and shall be and r•emain in the property of, the Hendota Heights Poiice Department. Menda'ta •shal3. have access ta such baoks, records••and reports at reasonable business houra, buC sub�ect to any applicable StaCe az Federal laws OY'•L'@�ulat+ans reoardir.g �ccess th�r�ta cr shall not indemnify nor hold Mendota Heights harmless for intentional or grossly negligent acts or ommissions of the Hendota Heights Police Department or its agents, servants, representatives, or employees. Mendota Heights agrees that �endota Heights Police Officers �ill be insured while working in Mendota to the sa�e ex�ent that they are insured while working in Mendota Heights. 4. Term. This Agreement shall commence as of the lst day of January,1986 , a::d sha?1 rer�ain in full forc2 and effect until terminated by either party by the giving of not less than ninety (90) days prior written notice of termination to :tie other party. 5. �ocices. All notices, offers� requests, and o[her communications from either of the parties hereto to the other shall be in writing and shall be considered to have been duly given or served if sent by first class certified or registered mail� return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the party at its r�ailing address, or to such other address as such party may hereafter designate by �ritten notice to the other party. b. Waiver. The vaiver by either party of the breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach of such or any other provision. 7. Governing Lav. This Agreement shall be subject to and governed by the lavs of the State of Minnesota. 8. Headings. The headings of the paragraphs and subparagraphs of this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and do not form a part hereof and in no vay interpret or construe such paragraphs and subparagraphs. 9. Parties in Interest. This Agreement shail be binding upon and inure to the benefit of [he successors and assigns of Mendota and Mendota Heights. 10. Entire Agree�ent. This instruroent contains the er�tire agreement of the parties. It may not be changed orally but only by an agreesnent in writing signed by the part,y aRainst whom enforcemen[ of any waiver, change� modification, or f 11. Counterparts. This Agreelnent may be executed in any number of counterparts� each of vhich shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the sar�e instrument. 12. Enforceability. If any part of this Agreement or any part of any provision hereof shall be adjudicated to be void or invalid, then the re�naining provision hereof not specifically so adjudicated to be invalid shall be executed without reference to the part or portioti so adJudicated, insofar as such remaini;�� provisions are capable of e�cecution. 13. Fines. Mendota shall be entitled to all money collected from fines inposed for offenses and violations of all.laws and ordinances occurring within che Cicy� of Mendota and Mendota Heights shall pay over to Mendota all such fine money vhich is collected by or paid to Mendota Heights. Mendota and the �(endo�a City Attorney shall retain control of the prosecution of all offenses and violations of lavs and ordinances committed within the City of Mendota � including traffic offenses and violations, vhich are customarily prosecuted by the City Attorney. 1G. Authority. Police officers of the Mendota Heights Police Department are hereby given the authority, power and jurisdiction to enforce the statutes and lavs of the State of Ninnesota and the ordinances of the City of '�endota vithin the territorial limits of the City of Mendota . This paragraph is intended as a grant of authority and does not impose any additional obligations �hich are not othervise contained in this Agree�ent. , IN tdITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of the day anci first year above wri�ten. Dated: Dated: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Zts Mayar Attested: By Its City Clerk Da ted : � C'} -`�s -�5 � CITY OF MENDOTA B`� � �'i�� `�'`-�`'-��-�`�' Its Mayar Dated: � v �' G�?-�� Attested: y .� Its City Approved by City of Mendata Heights City Gouncil pursvant ta Resolution dated , Approved by City af MendoCa CiCy Cauncil pursuant to Resolution daC�d lo—s�— �� - Administrative Officcs CITY OF MENDOTA HEIG�ITS September 12, 1985 Mayor Robert Bruestle 400 G Street Mendota, MN 55150 Dear Bob: Per your request, we have studied the issue of police and fire contracts with Mendota, Lilydale, and Sunfish Lake. We met earlier this year to discuss •' alternatives and we have since sent you additional information. On Wednesday September llth, we met with Lilydale and negotiated an arrange- ment whereby charges in our rates would be phased in over a two-year period. I think this sets a reasonable precedent to be followed with Mendota and Sunf ish Lake. Your 1985 payment to us for police service is $36,900. Under the new allocation (population and calls for service), plus the two-year phase in arrange- ment, your 1986 police cost would be $34,912. It would then be reasonable to .. assume that you would see little or no increase in 1987. On the fire contract, we will be allocating on the basis of property value and calls for service. Property value will continue to be based on assessed, rather than market value. As you will recall, the problem with the existing formula is that costs are two years old (i.e., for 1985 you are paying a fair share of what it cost us to run our department in 1983). Based on the agreement with Lilydale, for 1986, we will use 1985 data, and for 1987, catch up to the current year. Your fire contract cost for 1986 will be $3,462, as compared to �2,536 this year. The net effect is that your total cost for police and fire will drop from �39,436 in 1985 to $38,374 for 1986. We are also going to continue work on a master false ��larm ordinance, wtlicti can be considered for �dqption by all of the communities. , I have enclosed a 1986 police contract with the new figures. Please present it for consideration by your City Council, then execute and return both copies to me. We will then approve and sign, and return a file copy to you. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Cevin D. Frazell, City Administrator ��iosdr� 750 South Plaza Drive • Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 • 452-1850 ��``�� ' ' ' . 4 ' .. ,�� S� .._ .. West Publlshinp Company • 50 W. Kellogg Blvd., P.O. Box 64526, St. Paul, MN 55164-0526 Tel: 612/228-2500 L. J. CULLIGAN Assistant Ed�tor-in-Chief 612/228-2611 October 8, 1985 To: The Landowners and Residents of Valley View Oak Subdivision Re: Lot 17, Block 1, Valley View Oak The lot on the southwest intersection of Culligan Lane and Glenhill Road has been recently sold to Mr. Nicholas Linsm.ayer - Vice President of Manufac- turing, Villaume Industries,Inc. This letter is to introduce you to the new purchaser and secondly, to advise you that Mr. Linsmayer will be applying to the City of Mendota Heights for a variance to the south side lot requirements. The need for this variance will becom.e apparent to you as you review this letter and the attached plat plan of that lot. The south lot line in question is that line extending from. Glenhill Road to the west. The lot line is established by the split rail fence which I erected this summ.er. Under the city zoning ordinances, for assessm.ent purposes, the rear lot line of any corner lot is defined as that side which is iIDmediately opposite the shortest property line on a street. As you can see from. the attached survey, the shortest distance on the street is 82 feet, which is on Culligan Lane, making the property line containing the split rail fence, as defined by the zoning ordinance, the rear lot line. I am, told that the zoning ordinance is written this way to protect owners of corner lots for assessm.ent purposes. That is, assessm.ents would norm.ally be determined by the shortest distance on a street plus 10 or 15 feet on the longest distance. When assessments were esta- blished for Valley View Oak, each lot was assessed the same as all other lots in the subdivision. It was m.y position at that time that all lot owners should bear the same assessm.ent cost irregardless of the number of lineal feet on the street. The net result of this zoning requirement makes the south line of this lot a rear lot rather than a side lot thereby requiring a 30 foot setback wh'eieas�^� a side lot requirem.ent is 10 feet. I have drawn on the attached survey how this would affect this corner lot. In addition to the 30 foot setback on the rear lot line, it is also required, on any street, to have a 30 foot setback. This particular lot, therefore, has a 30 foot setback along Culligan Lane - a 30 foot setback along Glenhill Road and because of the code interpretation - a 30 foot setback along the south line by the split rail fence. If the City of Mendota Heights requires this interpretation and will not grant a variance, Mr. Linsm.ayer's house necessarily is forced closer to Dick,, Swanberg's house. I have discussed with Mr. �Linsmayer if the variance is granted, would he be rem.oving the tall evergreen trees now bordering Dick Swanberg's house. He indicated he m.ay transplant 4 or 5 of the most westerly trees, but his in- tention is to retain the other trees which now exist. Mr. Linsm.ayer does wish to face his house on Glenhill Road and is asking the city to consider the lot line where the split rail fence is as a side lot rather than as a rear lot. � .. Y 4 . r � � �I � TO THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, MENOOTA HEIGHTS, MN I would like to petition for a ten-foot setback variance on the south lot line of Lot 17, Block I, Valley View Oaks Ist Addition. The reasons for this request ere as follows: � I) Since this lot is on a corner, there are already thirty-� oot setbacks on two sides of the property. A third thirty-Foot setback makes the lot too small to be buildable in a prac- tical manner. 2) The south side of Lot 17, Block I would not be considered the back yard For my proposed house. but a side yard. Mr. Lawrence Culligan.who owns the property adjacent to the south line, expressed ta me his interest in building a house between his current home and my proposed home. The north side of his lot would be a side yard to his new house. He has, therefore, given me his complete concur- rence for my proposed variance. 3) The Architectural Review Committee for Valley View Oaks has reviewed my proposal and has given their unanimous approval for my request. 4] The site lines of my proposed house would be in harmony with the current houses on Culligan Lane and Glenhill Road, and in line with the proposed house next door. 5) Attached to this letter is a plot plan indicating the Foot print o� my house and its relationship to the neighborhood houses. There is also a letter from the Architectural Review Committee indicating its approval. And finally there is a plot plan of the lot itself. Thank you very mUCh for your consideration in this metter, �i�� -' . Nicholas Linsmayer 2117 Goodrich Avenue St. Paul, MN 55116 October II, 1985 This m.akes particular sense to me� anather house is bu11t south af the £or that house would be considered �+� especia].ly in vi.ew of the fact that if split rail fence, the split rail fence a side lot. Under the restrictive cavenants for the Valley View Oak� any variance re- quested of the city m.ust first be reviewed by the ArchiCectural Cantrol CammitCee priar ta presentatian ta the city. The Architecturai Control Comm.ittee has re- viewed this request and unanimously agrees with the petition of Mr. Linsmayer� asking for the side lot interpretation rather than the rear lat interpretation, feeling that if a 30 foot setback is required £rom the split rail fence� it forces a new house to be built in a locatian which is less desirable than if a side lat i.nterpretation is granted. I have attached a duplicate copy of this Ietter and so that yaur feelings can be presented to the City of Mendota Heights� I would appreciate your signa- ture i.ndicating either yaur appraval ar your disapprovai of Mr. Li.ns�ayer's request. Your opinions will then be submitted to the City of Mendota Heights when Mr. Linsm.ayer presents his petitian. I would lilce to also further state, �so that there is no misinterpretation on your part, that I have granted to Mr. Linsmayer the aption of purchasing this lot with ar without the variance granted. Mr. Linsmayer can void this contract £ar the parchase of Lat 17 if the City of Mendata Heights does not grant the variance or, at his optian he can proceed with the purchase of this lat and positian his house on this Iot withaut the variance. If the variance is not granted and Mr. Linsm.ayer exercises his option not Co purchase�this lat, then the lot will be put back an the market and eventually a purchaser will be ].ocated to build within the restricCions an this lot without a variance. It is my feeling that with a variance, Mr. Linsmayer will build a quality hause in keeping with the ham.es already established in Valley View Oak. Thank yau for taking the time ta read this lengthy explanation, anci I enclose an envelope for your convenience in returning your si.gned copy of this letter. Please �ust deposit this envelope in u�y mailbox as you drive by. Cardially, Lawre J. Culiigan LJC/mst Enc. As a praperty owner af Valley View Oak - Lat �, Black l, I request the City af Mendota Heights to grant the variance requested by Mr. Linsm.ayer, allowing him. to build within 14 feet o€ the south property line of Lot 17, Black 1. Mr. Mrs. I disagree with Mr. Linsmayer`s request for a variance and ask the tity not ta grant this variance. 1 Mr. Mrs. �� St.46n �c+ar» �r �u�-��il i 193 �i 44-52 OD �.��: � _�.93:�85 �� V.,.0 ,..3fi.._ NJ�tntbf R �Aei�.ip �.�— ��J.1�•�> I7 A�VaUl7y.�yl.,�ry far MUmiu.. 7am:lorJr/ a mna'rCaa� 5e.dom '> .--,,.,tt,�� «u�va � Wrya JI Nit��n A a .. ui e�uw> .,r cw.a.n.�ra ,� t.n ,`� � un.� �_ n ��G weaH� a..,.. w�.: ,. t. Cnur. ,.,,�r Ct Se.��..�m. ;,`t kat�f�n..�iu ..��n...... r....i..� t0.'aSwn etlh��rrar� y'�nir�i 4y,ni tlncryO� ��O�On� N�mWi4 ��y ��I�n d�II f4U�u C�n��tJ Sl,.�,�n. ��. �� '� 'ub3it Works 6arage, 2431 South l.exington Ave, i�fendota Nei hts MFi, �� T �f control station �aith antenna under 2Q ft. at t}e�tdpta Neights Gity Hall; )50 So Plaza Drive, � � }� telephone {�12j 454-4059, �iendata Heights; RF Control station wlth antenna under 20 ft at k', St. Paul Gity !lall, � H mb 1 t Av n W , p ��,�� c,•a iw.oM�i co�,m Ho. �� uo-K.v��'lwenseeH.ms�s.vrn:n„cna�a. 'a aamasw.r.n: p —._._,_„` fiV r+a.r W NITe I��TN�s�_��aC� � CQN FCC USE pNtY City of Mendata Heights, ttN �-��uz�___ _._ ,,�„�,�,..�•.�.,,:,..,,, ;�,;:: �,_._..�.__._+.,,.,,�,,,w•, a n��k..�,�,,,> -�------------ 22. �.+,dnq,�uai�ss Inumco� a 5v.ac n O Bu. �i a� i�ul. "o-+..�� C.�..��s«Hv. ` Attn: Fotice Chief Dennis Oelmont 75d South Plaza Drive � a� cn. 4kndota Nei h ' s"'• 2y, z�rcoo„ 9 tS AfN 5522D �M=..,.��,.�»,..,,..��„�..�._ :4� w5�., �::�w„w.H,Q.F.�o�::�oN�w,. ,.��,...i.i.w„�� u.. �u,.a:n.,.,� �U:.�.,.ti�_. � ` ---- ` ISi�..�.�...��.�T`-'."'+.:M1n+�GvinWN��,.if,awwn.«..�twe+M.e4�w..� • ..... .��..�.,�_ LLIE..a41w�M��YB0uV111 F�'�lf`�� VIiIIII _��—� ,�",=n;;',`w;;,��` unicaaons Commission --' ' ?nvatir Nn r-•w` c.... _ � -- U�u burnau :6 � N � � a. ma..n�.a a+..��. . .. ..... " �...� .�... `'�"' .-+�,,,_., � �� aQ�wt.usV.l�Mir.Janrv' InUln�pnlalM�aHuciu��ti�uwGW�W.ynrrn��y�.�.u�..�.�..... 1' �•� �.a...��,.. ,. "�—._.._...�. • ' ' --- .. �0 YY� ' la]I$+J� �:a�l�.J N3 Yea N i_=YM1w�Y. . i /Ir�Unt3iJirw' � �•�� ..� ( ��,� � �I.� �....�.... ! ..�..�. ..�. «. �-..�..��. i�.l�u :�7 �lilemilw�� tri n•s�WtieWCW�s�n+Ci+o�O+aiiar�iwnWieni�inJxttnryieiFAtit�ua.��i.�il��:u..�. �� . �••••• _••• µv•-.-�..-^_ u�^�•Mtnl��•�}�nJ�teC��ultr�r,.nyrtlJOU � • .o r�s G.�+c'nea � .• • �•,• .�:��r.«�o,r iiNu�r.v.u�.� h.l��y U�q�r NnM1;n r.��l � � -- � V, ^•••` ( : .:�l�.hxtnv� (M ryl%_.�..�. . ._ .... . w.. . �.. . . • .X (:Jrt �.:�:�li � Appiitant is a Minnesota �—`�.�__._ .. _ Municipality ±u.Cai�w��ftOritYai:.p4). `_<~ •_'._•_ _•� l:i.I�.1YW�iMnllir •_'��••... ._,...! X Nav' $lalwh l�.�al�r J N Jr d� ��. i. ' J�i.Clh9n=��,�-��_��„�� t,li��nfl�l�•m�nl �Ilu„•:�.�1 x � .u�.lntin �lt��a ✓:I+��tiwlW�'�.IaN�F;� i U f �.....��..n.��.�J.�.i..... � i. - �....�.v.H. �u�� oCAU 1ISJ!? � �]trs p�(�HO •1: �Iw:.ilw.i.��Ii� � � '- �. .. � � 90.17(aj ' ei tl.penN iM eypy�ry0 atsiMnwM p�n RWy �Ki�an te] 11. P i0i.i0W1�4muwl�nytNaeDtl1..�IhMlurrt�al: �� „ John R. 5 -- .siz�� 1lNaW/Ke1wnulCr.e�.nqrd,t.�. . ••I.�..r.u.q�,� .. ,., ,��:.�o�.H.. 348-4081 w �w,.�,:,� ..,.�. .. , , . . .n„ ,�„ ..,� OtY.HiiF�i.triiiL4�.�.n :, n4`�t..��f.. " ' i��IreJ..� .a.a�w��.� )i St�ln. i..iif.i. .t �i i... . �' .•. � � , .. i �� .. �....ii . . �..i, Ilful �alya st:,temcnts made on �,"°. , ,. �.: , __._.. _ . . . .. ... ..... .. . .... s form are punlsha6le by fine �:��_ '—M��a�. �glmpnt �� `�"�" d/or imprisonmEnt. U.S. Cade �1.i`�'`-� '-•_ .---- ::action lOUt. — - • � -��^ �`�-1211�c 10 1 %. q�,S r:,.�.�3 _.5� il�:d,� ' �� 1. • • ' ' ' - i?C� 1�; ��"S.i. YYJIW.V .u.�.�+1:.'v.;tn•JJtc�. .�,'.I�Onul i�i��'i�l�.lit �ii t,.r.' i .�. .. � J�+ �' X <.1 �S,..Li�ii �i.' r.i.,aw . n..� . . ....� N..n.. .itli :e . �.. . . ..f.�.. ..1.� • . .L,..f .A l.'�I�'il' > J � • . � i. , � . { ` ,� . f ^ { ' •! ' iq K i' ` � , � . _ �i F2 � � � . � � • , Y:..,. ;':.4 _;«n'M.",;; _-}_::.�:. . : .. . ` , ' ... ��. ' +�y � . ' • r . , , ` � J ` . . _ . i J .•� � ''r . . ' � - � - � . • � . . . ��•�,{�`'�"• lY�, rf3'?� . . " • , r • _T :`�{:•` _ � i�J.;�?' ..i " • • ' :3' '�� :•%�',,. _ . . ��f.:i�i�l+ -- 'f" •.� �'L . , .. ... . r �. .�1 '/ .. :� _ � � . . � "��", � _ : �� _ , , _ 7,,•��i � , . �.. ♦ •i'%�. •_�t� ,t . . � . . _ r. i t� � . . . i �.? . �'.} i,., . ' _ � : . . . . • . . . a - ,:� u "�~ ,.. ..�S.�e»,/.. • , .._�.. r .. _ .....r_.._. ^;' Y.. :�i1t��i i�.1.i:!''�'�: � S`.`.�l31xJ.t�1f-..i� f�ESF�.Xn"�(i��E�3�Y 1.'�'iii�I!'I'�i}� f}I"'�XCi�"i> iA�;'• - :..�:.3,'r.W� �.'`,!..L ti 8�'?'t��t41� I�'si£t 14/O1J'�3 �iU 9ti+�! �t ` ''' Tji 1'r'�I.-�'.;', i.�'i. • . - T;� y:�� .7t;�� "#�::11t't�'�.kUhtl�"E !�F 9£ FtLf.D iiYTi4 '�`E� FCC �fr'fif,t�! �b 11A�fII .:��ri:. ii..lW�rrt>> � �,�,3{.�.� ' - � , r uanr� :�:^"'C.~', n.i:Ai?G'T�'ti - R`� t,�'it C��'^i �� Ci.GY ['d�l � ili� ^, �, c.�+M1Sa .�,� ..�,,,� 4, i.., „�-,� ,. � r;4 S"it3 2^� �tf7 if ift 3�3�S�JtfE1 P3tE!8!'� �i�.ittt l�t:t6�'€�tik`�ct�i:v?� :.•:' :�;;�- ; � . ;: , � v • . �4Ys�100 9.�IfJz7/`',i� . . . ... , ._..: - . .. :�� r�, ' _ . .. �4i"52!(�{1 �"dl�,}H/';�• . . ;''. :`� ��t � . , ,. , , • � ..�\ ,w - .-•r�.:-•T •ry�e �:.'iC �ry" `•'�, :'n ��, . `:�.�f!''. :'?,: . » , i..1....t�. ., ..,L . .. . .; rn•y. S.• � � � _ .r... r' n i.�•i.l: i:i;�:•'.fT.'.° . �7f `,�.� .. . .��.�vt ��r i .�%'. .r . . .. , .Li � a � � APPLICANi COPY r);�''.�, t?. (,al,r:ii;t.':i;a; : ,: �t ��,.(, ••:,� �•�,i•,y�.. .r� ��: .'tY .J••:�v _ .Y i�'✓'�'i��JC�i .o-:o,`,� '-l'�. +:k•_: .�S�.;ti ;' _ . fr •.'jl�� I:h�7`:': ' I .i::,- �I •.'i;.: �i�."-:{: =�4� �`Sr: �S. r1-:✓'l:_�c.; '>�%i`�'iiy:.% �i � •�n.'t't1:;' ;, � ' �r:t „` . ,+ . , �� .J:�:?t ;., �, .i•f�T.. ♦ j. �k' F •r. 4'it:'�1T''!' 'tk.•• i`�'"• `�'t, � Msi i•..,'`�%i;:if:�.': T,�'°�'" ,,,r. S.LJ;:;.i;r'*„_� �,�,•I:��A. '�Y1',�":'• . , r'. .i'. f . . j . %3�.....>: 'Z';;�i. � Y. f a �T�i:.;:� �:5.��,,'.� w.;..�r � ;f'Cu,'•�.*:' %''�i' �.✓� ;Y=:'; 'i��•' f'•'^ .. -. : t'' . t•ri' '4.17,: �� ,+/: '.4'�+�?y � t , ' . .. �� - ��. . . - ' . . � . -- . ' � . � . . . ' .. . .. . . ' . . -. - --. - - T-- CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS - • �- -- --- MEMO October 9, 1985 _ T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Fraze � � City Admi ' rator SUBJECT: Computer Study BACKGROUND Last spring, Council approved a contract with DSM Information Services, Inc., to complete the first four phases of a study of the City's EDP needs and alternatives. At the meeting of August 20th, you were presented with the needs assessment portion of the consultant's work. That document included a five- year cost comparison of leasing or owning an in-house system versus continuing to be a member of the LOGIS consortium. An in-house system was identified as being both less costly and more flexible in meeting City needs. The consultant has now completed the final phase of his project, the "Requirements Specification." A copy is enclosed with your packet. (You will probably also want to bring the "Needs Assessment" with you to the meeting). DISCUSSION The final phase of the project is to actually implement the results of the study. I am attaching the description of the implementation phase from the original proposal of DSM. As was discussed on August 20th, we would forsee acquiring the equipment in mid-spring 1986, and allowing approximately the next half year for getting up and running on the system. Existing accounting functions would not be taken off LOGIS until late next year. Our goal would be to completely be "on our own" by January 1, 1987. BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS - The adopted 1986 budget allocates funds sufficient to continue our participation with LOGIS for the entire year. Staff proposes that funds for acquisition ot- the new system (either purchase or lease) be taken from fund balances of various City departments, then replaced by the cost savings in subsequent years. Consultant McCauley indicates that his fee for the Phase V-Implementation stage will continue to be $3,600. This amount, plus the approximately $5,000 expended to date for the study can be taken from the Administration contingency line item of $11,700, which remains untouched at this time. ACTION REQUIRED Mr. McCauley will be present to present his report and answer your questions. � If Council is then satisfied that we should proceed to acquire our own EDP system, it should pass a motion authorizing DSM Information Services, Inc., to enter the Implementation phase of the project as outlined, at a fee not to exceed $3,600. As a part of the Implementation phase, Council will be approving the RFP, and awarding the final contract, so this is not your last chance to have input on the costs and details. ' � CITY OF MENI}OTA HEIGHTS MEMO October 9, 1985 T0: Mayor, City Council and City A�i�r�tor FROM: Klayton Eckles Civil Engineer and James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUB,JECT: Sewers, Water, Streets and Lighting Yorkton Property Job No. 8422 Improvement No. 84, Project No. 4 DISCUSSION: The following constitutes a feasibility report for the proposed con- struction of sanitary and storm sewers, water, streets and lighting improve- ments to serve the proposed Yorkton Centre Pointe South Subdivision located south of State Trunk Highway 110 and west of Lexington Avenue. The proposed development measures about 55.5 acres in area and roughly 9 acres of the total will be used for street right-of-ways, outlots, and easements. The GNB property measuring 9 acres lies within the development but it will be exempt from most assessments. Except for the GNB property the project area has been rezoned from B-lA to B-1 or Limited Business District. The development will include 11 new lots, one of which will house the Alpha Conference Center. The development lies in a Tax Increment Dis- trict so a portion of the project costs can be covered by T.I.F. The utility requirements for a business district of this size are more demanding than a residential district of comparable size therefore additional criteria must be considered in the design. SOIL CHARACTERISTICS: To insure that the development has soils suitable for building purposes test holes were bored and soil samples taken at the site of the proposed conference center and at several points in the proposed street. These preliminary tests indicate that a portion of the area has poor soils for construction purposes: Thus additional work will be required for street and building construction. In some areas the ground water is high, therefore extra measures will need to be taken for sewer construction. In general the magnitude of the soil deficiencies is not excessive; it will just mean somewhat higher construction costs for the utilities. These extra costs have been figured into the cost estimates of the appropriate utilities. A discussion of the construction considerations, project costs and payment responsibilities concerning each of the utilities is presented� below. The attached drawings show the proposed design and layout. SANITARY SEWER Approximately 3530 feet of 8 inch sanitary sewer pipe will be placed to serve the development. The general lay of the land slopes westward making it cost prohibitive to connect the system to the existing sewer line along Lexington Avenue. The sewer line must flow to the west but the only ex- isting sewer line near the west end of the project is a line north of Highway 110 on Hunter Lane. To hook into the existing line on Hunter Lane will require a lift station and augering the force main beneath Highway 110. To construct the proposed sanitary sewer with services and force main will cost an estimated $267,000 including overhead, fees and contingencies, all of which is proposed to be assessed or covered by Tax Increment Financing. :,;. ,_ ..h,.. WATERMAINS To construct watermains as shown on the attached drawings will require the installation of 2360 feet of.8 inch pipe and 3700 feet of 12 inch pipe. The 12 inch pipe is an extension of the water trunk line from Lexington Avenue and will be placed under the frontage road all the way up to end of the frontage road construction near the Resurrection Cemetery. Only 2280 feet of pipe is part of the Yorkton project. The 8 inch pipe will connect to the 12 inch trunk extension and back to the existing trunk line on Lexington Avenue to f orm a loop. Each lot will receive a 6 inch fire line and a 2 inch oversize domestic service. The cost to construct the water utilities will be approximately $274,200, including overhead, fees and contingencies. $216,000 is proposed to be assessed against the project, while the extra $57,700 for the 12 inch extension to Resurrection is pro- posed to be covered by Tax Increment Financing. Those lots along the.�1.2 inch trunk line extension will be assessed the equivalent of an 8 inchk:' watermain and the excess is proposed to be covered by Tax Increment Fi= nancing. This amounts to roughly $20,000. The remainder is proposed to be split between assessments and Tax Increment Financing. STORM SEWER �' The storm sewer utilities will consist of 2800 feet of 12 and 18 inch pipe with catch basins and manholes, 770 feet of 42 inch pipe for routing the existing runoff from north of Highway 110, and a retention pond with a dike and an overflow. In general the storm sewer system will carry runoff the same route as the existing overland drainage. Therefore, there will not be any negative affects on existing adjacent properties. However, the development of the Yorkton project will increase the loadi.ng of stormfwater on Lake Augusta. The area discharging into Lake Augusta will not increase but the run off per acre will increase due to the land development. The owners of Resurrection Cemetery have recently expressed an interest in � having an outlet installed in Lake Augusta due to high water levels. Such an outlet would have to discharge into Lake LeMay which is also suffering from high water levels. Lake LeMay may have outlet installed in the near To improve the intersection of Lexington Avenue at Highway 110 wou.ld mean increasing the width of Lexington Avenue from two lanes to 4 lanes f or about 1800 feet and adding curb and gutter. This would provide .turning lanes into the development and access lanes out of the development. It would also increase the capacity of the Lexington/Highway 110 intersection. Thus the Yorkton streets will be designed to match a four lane Lexington Avenue. The approximate cost for reconstruction of Lexington Avenue in- cluding overhead, fees and contingencies would be approximately $220,000. Funding for such a project would come from four possible sources. Dakota County has also expressed an interest in upgrading the intersection and could pay for as much as 55% of the project if they have enough advance notice time to get the project into the County's budget. Mn/DOT would also be involved in the project because the traffic lights are under their con- trol. Therefore, they would share in the costs incurred with traffic light adjustments. The remainder of the project costs could be covered by M.S.A. f unding or assessments or both. This is just advance planning, upgrading of Lexington Avenue is not part of the Yorkton project. ,;. . a. , STREET LIGHTS The developer has requested street lights be installed as part of the project. The City currently does not have any set guidelines for street lighting for business or industrial districts. Therefore to avoid conflicts in the future Mendota Heights should set forth rules to standardize City street lighting in these types of areas. Rules should address the problems of setting a standard light style, deciding when street lights are appro- priate, charging the installation costs, charging the operational costs, and providing the proper maintenance. The street light plan for the Yorkton development will light the boulevard street and the 44 foot wide street. The frontage road will not be lit by City street lighting, but may be lit in some areas by Mn/DOT. The approximate cost of this street lighting plan is about $33,600, including overhead, fees and contingencies. Because this is an extra item over and above what is standard for this type of project,�i�t will not be eligible for T.I.F but it can be assessed. •• �;;,� � COST SUMMARY Below is a table of the projected costs for the construction of the utilities, streets, and lighting for the project. • Sanitary Sewers Watermain Storm Sewer Streets Frontage Road Frontage Road Curb & Gutter Street Lights $267,150 274,200 188,750 234,400 220,000 17,000 33,600 . - =,��• Estimated Total Cost $1,235,100 a�� future, but this outlet would be limited in capacity. Therefore, if Resur- rection Cemetery requested an outlet for Lake Augusta it would have to be sized to slowly meter water so that the LeMay system would not be overtaxed. It should be noted that outlets f or both Lake Augusta and Lake LeMay are not part of this project, but design for the Yorkton project should take these factors into account. The Yorkton project will also be designed to handle water from Lexington Avenue in the event Lexington Avenue is upgraded in the future. The cost for the entire storm sewer system for the Yorkton develop- ment is approximately $188,750 including overhead, fees and contingencies. The GNB property will be included in the assessment because it contributes a substantial amount of storm water. The remainder of the costs is proposed to be covered by assessments to Yorkton, Ltd. and Tax Increment Financing. STREETS The proposed street plan for this development is unusual in several regards. Due to the heavier traffic load expected for a business district the road surface will be a 9 ton design instead of a standard residential design. The street width also will be increased: 44 feet wide f or the east-west street and two 26 foot wide lanes separated by a 20 foot boulevard for the north-south street. The lots along the northern portion of the parcel will be served by a 30 foot wide frontage road with curb and gutter on the south side. The frontage road is part of the Mendota Interchange Project scheduled for 1989 construction. The City of Mendota Heights, the developer and Mn/DOT have worked out a tentative agreement for an early construction of the frontage road. Yorkton, Ltd. has agreed to give Mn/DOT the necessary right-of-way for the frontage road in exchange for its early construction. The City will design and construct the frontage road ac- cording to Mn/DOT's requirements and Mn/DOT will reimburse the City f or the cost of construction. Mn/DOT would like the frontage road to be extended further than required to serve the development so that Resurrection Cemetery may also be served. Curb and gutter will be installed with the frontage road along the Yorkton property, but it is not standard construction for a frontage road, therefore Mn/DOT won't pay for the it; the cost of the curb and gutter is approximately $17,000 and will be assessed to the development. The City street construction, including overhead, fees and contingencies will cost approximately $234,400, all of which will be covered by assess- ments or Tax Increment Financing. The cost of the frontage road,not in- cluding curb and gutter but including overhead, fees and contingencies is about $220,000, which will be reimbursed by Mn/DOT. The added traffic volumes from the development will have an �mpact on traffic flow in the surrounding areas. Lexington Avenue at the intersection of Highway 110 in particular will be affected. The existing intersection of Highway 110 and Lexington is inefficient and in need of redesign. The added traffic from the development turning on and off of Lexington will increase the danger of the intersection and further impede traffic flow. This coup- led with the Highway 110 upgrading for the Mendota Interchange Project suggest that the Lexington Avenue crossing may require upgrading at a future date. Therefore staff is considering a future project to upgrade Lexington Avenue and how the Yorkton development would accommodate such a project. That is, provisions will be made in the design of the Yorkton project in anticipation of future Lexington improvements. ' For a development of this size this figure appears to be quite large. For comparison only, without Tax Increment Financing the assessments would be about $210 per foot, which also seems high. There are several reasons these figures are both misleading and larger than normal. The following points will help put these figures in perspective. 1. Keep in mind that the project is eligible for Tax Increment Fi- nancing because the development is in a area considered expensive to build in. 2. The sanitary sewer requires a lift station and a highway crossing; both are expensive items. 3. The streets are a heavier and wider design than typical residen- tial streets. 4. The assessment per front foot is large because the lots have a high area to front footage ratio and many of the utilities are assess- , able to only one side of the street. Also the GNB property is not subject to any assessment except storm sewer. � � The financing of the project based on estimated construction costs and standard assessment procedures will be broken down as follows: PARTICIPANT ITEM Yorkton, Ltd. Sewer, Water, Storm, Streets Boulevard Extra Charge Frontage Road Curb & Gutter Lights Subtotal Tax Increment Extra-Ordinary Construction Financing 32% of Adjacent Areas Unassessable Resurrection Watermain Mn/DOT GNB Property Subtotal Frontage Road Storm Sewer TOTAL AMOUNT $ 482,800 19,000 17,000 33,600 $ 552,400 $ 151,300 227,200 57,700 $ 436,200 $ 220,000 $ 26,500 $1,235,100 The TIF amount is based on two factors, the extra construction and the unassessable front footage. Extra-ordinary construction costs include costs for a lift station, jacking across Highway 110, the oversize storm sewer, trunk watermain and soil corrections. The figure for unassessable front footage is included because a large portion of the utilities are assessable on only one side of a street. This amounts to about 32� of the total front footage. Thus 32% of the assessable normal utility costs is proposed to be covered by TIF. The unusual utilities such as street lights, the boulevard street and frontage road curb and gutter will be assessed to the property as well as the 68% of normal utilities. Using standard assessment procedures the total front footage assessed will be roughly 4,260 feet. For $552,400 of assessments this works out to $130 per front foot. This is about the average for similar developments around the area and it appears to be a fair assessment charge. RECON�IENDATION : On the basis of the request for public utilities to serve the proposed Yorkton Centre Pointe South Subdivision, it is possible and feasible to do so using the method shown in the attached preliminary design drawings and staff recommends the construction of the project. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, Council should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 85- , RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'<S REPORT AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STORM �" SEWER, STREETS AND LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE THE YORKTON CENTRE POINTE SOUTH SUBDIVISION AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT N0. 84, PROJECT N0. 4) City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. 85- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER, STREETS AND � LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE THE YORKTON CENTRE POINTE SOUTH SUBDIVISION AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT N0. 84, PROJECT N0. 4) � WHEREAS, the City Engineer has submitted his report to the City Council with respect to the proposed construction of the following improvements to serve Yorkton Centre Pointe South Subdivision and ajacent areas, to-wit: The construction of an extension to the City's sanitary sewer system, including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acquisition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets and easements the areas hereinafter more particularly described. The construction of a storm sewer system including appurtenances and incidentals thereto and the acquisition of easements, in and for the area hereinafter more particularly described. � �_ The construction of an extension to the City's water' distribution system including appurtenances and incidentals there'to, and the acqui- sition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets and easements in the area hereinafter more particularly described. r- The construction of street improvements consisting o� the acquisi- tion of easements and the grading, stabilization, drainage and bitumi- nous surfacing, and the construction of concrete cur•bs and gutters on the streets to be situated in the area hereinafter more particularly described. The construction of street light system including ap;purtenances and incidentals thereto, in the area hereinafter more particularly de- scribed. WHEREAS, the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is situated within the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota, and is owned by Yorkton, Ltd. and GNB and is more particularly described as follows: Land abutting the west right-of-way line of Lexington Avenue, and the south right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway 110 and lying north and east of the Resurrection Cemetery Plats 63400 and 63401, and the south portion of the Trunk Highway right-of-way designated:for frontage road commencing 3700 feet west of Lexington Avenue. � WHEREAS, in said report said City Engineer reported that the proposed im- provements and construction thereof were feasible and desirable and further • reported on the proposed costs of said improvements. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the report of said City Engineer be and is hereby re- ceived. 2. That a public hearing on said improvements be held on Tuesday, December 3, 1985 at 7:45 o'clock P.M. at the Mendota Heights City Hall 750 South Plaza Drive in the City of Mendota Heights. 3. That the City Clerk, with the aid and assistance of the City Attorney, be and is hereby authorized and directed to prepare a notice of said hearing and to cause said notice to be published and mailed to the owners of the property situated within said area, all in accordance with applicable Minnesota Statutes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 5th day of November, 1985. r� �. CITY COUNCIL • CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor ATTFST: >•.. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk �:s. m n � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO October 9, 1985 T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. F el� City Ad istra or� SUBJECT: Approval of Mendota Police Contract Attached for your consideration is a 1986 contract with the City of Mendota to provide police service. This contract was approved at their City Council meeting of October 8th. The amount in the contract is $34,912, down from the $36,900 they are paying this year. The reduction is a reflection of our new philosophy of reallocating costs among the communities based half on population and half on calls for service. As Council will recall, Lilydale will be seeing a fairly sizeable increase in their contract under this arrangement. As outlined in the attached letter and memo, this figure goes half-way toward reducing Mendota to what we calculate their fee should be on the new formula. The intent would be then to have all of the cities on the formula in 1987. ACTION REQUIRED Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the 1986 police contract with the City of Mendota. ' KDF:madlr attachment l f' 0 T0: FROM: CITY OF MENBOTA HEIGHTS I�MO Mayor, City Council and City James E. Danielson Public Works Director Ad ��Itor October 9, 1985 SUBJECT: Tandem Request for Rezoning, Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat Case No. 85-23 DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission held a special meeting on September 25th to consider the Southeast Area Study and the proposed Tandem Development. that meeting the Planning Commission voted to recommend Plan B-1 within Southeast Area Study. That study alternative called for rezoning of the Tandem piece of property, so they then went on to recommend approval of rezoning, planned unit development and preliminary plat. Their motion At the that recommending approval however, included a recommendation referring the pro- posal to the Parks Commission for comment. Mr. Putnam and several of the affected residents attended the October 8th Park and Recreation Commi.ssion meeting and presented their proposal. The Park and Recreation Commission informed Mr. Putnam that they are just beginning a Comprehensive Park Study and that they were not far enough along in that study to make any recommendation on park dedication at this time. They did say they were in favor of the rezoning and indicated that they would probably be ready to make a recommendation on park dedication at their November meeting. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and the Park and Recreation Commissions recommend that the City Council grant the requested rezoning. The Planning Commission also recommends approval of the planned unit development and the preliminary plat. The Park and Recreation Commission did not seem to have any problem with the platting configuration however they delayed their recommendation based on their inability to determine a park dedication until their November meeting. Tandem has offered the following as their park dedication: PHASE I Total Size: Park Land Dedication: Pond: Scenic Easement: Trail System: 37 Acres 4.15 Acres 6.37 Acres 0.3 Acres Through Park Land & Development � PHASE II & III Total Size: Park Land lledication: Pond: Scenic �asement: Trail System: 100 Acres 5.5 Acres 14.0 Acres 1.73 Acres Through Development Staff feels that the Council could grant the planned unit development and preliminary plat approval now with the details of the park dedication left to be worked out with the Park and Recreation Commission before final plat approval. AGTION REQUIRED: Conduct a public hearing to consider the rezoning and conditional use permit for a planned unit development for the attached proposal. If Council desires to implement the Planning and the Park and Recreation Commission's recommendation to rezone the property they should pass a motion adopting-. Ordinance No. 217, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 401. Also, if Council wishes to implement the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval of Tandem's planned unit development and preliminary plat they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 85- , RESOLUTION APPROVING TANDEM CORPORA- TION'S PLANNED UNIT DEVEIAPMENT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT. � � .r CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA- COUNT-Y; htINNESOTA --- 4- ORDINANCE N0. 217 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 401 - The City Council of the city of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, ordains as follows: Section 1. Ordinance No. 401 know and referred to as the "Mendota Heights Zoning Ordinance" is hereby amended in the following respects: A. The following described property situated in the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota, is hereby rezoned from an "R-lA" One Family Residential District, as the case may be to an "R-1" One Family District, to-wit: The Northerly 60 acres of the NE1/4 of Section 36, Township 28, Range 23, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the NE1/4 of Section 36, thence Southerly on the East line of said NE1/4, 50 rods, thence in a South- westerly direction across said NE1/4 to a point on the West line of the NEl/4 which is 70 rods South from the Nrothwest corner of said NEl/4 which is 70 rods South from the Northwest corner of said NE1/4, thence 70 rods North to the Northwest corner of said NE1/4, thence East on the North line of said NE1/4 of said Section 36 to the place of beginning, EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following: Commencing at a point on the East line of Section 36, Township 28, Range 23, 330.0 feet South from the Northeast corner of said Section 36, thence North 89 35' West, parallel to the North line of said Section 36, 800.0 f eet, thence South parallel to said East line 594.2 feet, thence North 83 19' East 805.5 feet to the East line of said Section 36, thence North 495.0 feet to the point of beginning, ancl FURTHER EXCEPTING the North 330 feet of the East 800 feet of said N�l/4. AND That part of the NE1/4 of Section 36, Township 28, Range 23, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said NE1/4, running thence North along the �ast line ot- said NE1/4 a distance of 1813 f�eL, running thence Southwesterly a distance of 805.5 feet to a point 926.2 feet South of the North line of said NEl/4, running thence North a distance of 2 f�et, running thence Southwesterly to a point on the West line of said NE1/4, said point being 1485 feet North of the Southwest corner of said NE1/4, running thence South along said West line a distance of 1485 feet to the Southwest corner of said NE1/4, running thence East along the South line of said NE1/4 to the point of beginning; EXCEPTING THEREFROM that part thereof platted as Delaware Crossing. - Section 2. The Zoning hlap of the City of Mendota Heights referred to and described in said Ordinance No. 401 as that certain map entitled "Zoning Map of Mendota Heights" shall not be published to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the City Clerk shall appropriately mark the said Zoning Map on f ile in the Clerk's office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning here- inabove provided for in this Ordinance, and all of the notations, references and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by ref erence and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its publication according to law. Enacted and ordained into an Ordinance this lSth day of October, 1985. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk )Y ! CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO October 10, 1985 T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Frazelt�� City Administ SUBJECT: South East Area Comprehensive Plan Amendments BACKGROUND At the October lst meeting Council voted 4-1 to accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission to amend the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan to Concept B-1, as spelled out in the City Planner`s report of August 23rd. My interpretation of that action was that staff should prepare the documents for effecting such an amendment and present them for Council action at a subsequent meeting. The following agenda item was Planning Case ��85-10, the Riley apartment proposal in the southeast area. It was moved to give concept approval to the project, and to direct staff to prepare a PUD agreement and ordinance rezoning the property. The motion passed 3-2. Since, by City ordinance and State statute, rezonings must be by a 4/5's vote, it appears that Council would not be able to adopt the rezoning ordinance when it is presented. DISCUSSION It is my opinion that the two Council votes of October lst, taken together, leave us in a quandry. We could be faced with a Comprehensive Plan designating a par- ticular land use, but then reject a rezoning for a project basical_ly consistent with the Plan. For both legal and practical reasons, I don't think we want to be in that position. City Planners Dahlgren and Carlson, and I have since met with the Council "minority" to determine what changes in the Comprehensive Plan amendments might be more acceptable to them. Hopefully, we could then reach a concensus position that would allow us to amend the Plan, and approve subsequent development proposals consistent with those amendments. Attached is a memo from the planners, outlining some alternatives for Council consideration. RECOMMENDATION AND ACTIUN REQUIRED Council should first pass a motion to reconsider its action of Octcaber lst, relative to the Southeast Area Study. That motion should be made by a member who voted on the prevailing side. Assuming that motion passes, Council should then receive the presentation of the City Planner, discuss alternative ways of amending the Comprehensive Plan, and direct staff as to a desired course of action. � KDF:madlr attachment � �a-��-a� MEMGRA�VUUM TQ: Mayor and Ci ty Cr� I 1� � City Administ�� r�� FROt�i: Chi ef af Pol i ce �'O SUBJECT: SErgeents Promatian�l Examination Histary Council has approved the promotion of e Patrol Officer ta the r�nk of Sergeant end the hiring of e new officer to replece the one promoted. The anly discussion was based on the renewal of the Mendata Police Contract. an 10-9-85 I delivered the signed contr�ct to the City Administratar and would now like to immediately begin the lengthy testinq prc�cedures for the two positions. Discussior� The tenteti��e tim�line far the prornation wauld be �s follaws: Octaber - relE�se the reeding list for the writter�� test. Naverr�ber - administer writtpn test. Na��ernt,er - pre��re for �nd �dtr�inister urbl inter��ii��W. Uecember - physicel and psycr�olagical eKbms fc,r fir��list�. Decernber - selectior� and cour�cil aGproval. Januery 1- new SergEer��t 5ppuinted. The Patr�l Clfficers examin�ti�n will n�t t�e qiver� until the �bove phyS1C81 �nd psycholagic�l testing hbs heen cr�mpleted. Recorr�rr�end�tiun Cauncil �uthorize the City Administrator and Chief of Police to begin the process of testing far a Sergeant, ond elsa to advertise and ac�ept applications for the new P�trol Officer. r :.' _. _. _ .,r.--_. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS _,., P�EMO October':10; 1985 T0: Mayor, City Council and City m'n's�tor FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Trunk Watermain Assessments ' Trunk Highway 149 Job No. 83176 Improvement No. 83, Project No. 76 � DISCUSSION: The Council held a public hearing on September 17th to consider an assess- ment roll for the trunk watermain project constructed along Dodd Road south of Lake Drive and Mendota Heights Road east of Dodd Road. At that meeting, as a result of a staff recommendation, Council directed that the assessment .against the School District property be reduced by $9,360 and that some further investigation on the validity of the assessment against the Carl ,;�, Case property be done. l. The attached roll has reduced the School District Property assessment by $9,360. 2. Upon a discussion with the City Attorney we still feelthat the Carl Case assessment can remain if it is deferred. . RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached assessment roll and all the requested deferments. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation they should pass motions adopting the following resolutions: Resolution No. 85- , RESOLUTIUN ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR WATERP�AIN TRUNK LINE ALONG TRUNK HIGHWAY 149 AND MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD (IMPROVEP�1ENT N0. 83, PROJECT N0. 7B) Resolution No. 85- , RESOLUTION DEFERRING PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS (IMPROVE��ENT N0. 83, PROJECT N0. 7B) _. . _ . �--- � . ae - •. . .. �' ..� � 2 �= Y.!...<.i:�.+ I�.sw; :: i ASSESSMF.NT PERIOU Watermain - 19 years CITY 0� MENIXYfA .....GHTS ASSF.SSMENT ROLL MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAU/TRUNK HICIIWAY 149 IMPROVEMF.NT N0. 83-78 JOB N0. 83178 ADOPTED � --�- .- PARCF.L REPUTF:U OWNf•.R AND SUBUIVISIUN I.OT [3LR. N0. DFSCRIPTIQN N0. \0. 27-03500- Visitation Pbnas[cry Section 35 Tvn 28 Range 23 -- -- 010-OS 2455 Visitation Drive S 3/4 of S 1/2 of NE 1/4 Lying W of Jefferson Mendota Ileighcs, h1N 55120 figay Ex N G00 Ft. & Ex k� 200 Ft. Ex Pt in Parcel 202 of STH R/W Plat No. 19-53 27-03500- Visitation Monastery Section 35 Twn 28 Range 23 -- -- 010-75 2455 Visitation Drive N 198 Ft of SE 1/4 lying W of JefEerson Ilswy Mendota Heights, DiN 55120 Ex W 200 Ft. & N 6 Ft, of S 330 Ft, of N 528 Ft. of NE 1/4 of SE 1/4 Lying W of Hgwy 27-03500- Ellen Gatt Section 35 Twn 28 Range 23 -- -- 010-77 2425 Dodd Road W of Ngay of S 20 R of N 32 R of NE 1/4 of Mendota Heights, MN 55120 SE 1/4 & Ex N 6 Ft. 27-03500- Visitation Monastery Section 35 Twn 28 Range 23 -- -- 010-78 2455 Visitation Drive S 48 R of N 1/2 of SE 1/4 W of Dodd Rd. Ex P(endota Heights, MN 55120 Com at Pt in Cen of Hgwy 1668.4 Ft. N of Int with S Line of SE 1/4 W 725 Ft. N 174.6 Ft. E 772.4 Ft. to cen of Hgwy SW 180.9 Ft, to Beg Ex W 260 Ft. 27-03500- Joseph & Della R. Gangl Section 35 Tvn 28 Range 23 -- -- 020-78 2487 Dodd Road Pt of SE 1/4 Com Int S Line & Cen Hgwy N88 Ptendota Heights, PiN 55120 N on Ngwy 1668.4 Ft. to Pt of Beg W 725 Ft. N 174.6 Ft. E 772.4 Ft. to Cen Hgwy SW 180.9 Ft. To Beg Ex 0.29 Acs Cont in Parcel 2C of STH R/W Plat No. 19-53 27-03500- Ind. School Dist. N197 Section 35 Twn 28 Range 23 010-79 1897 Delaware Avenue S 48 R of NE 1/4 of SE 1/4 E of Dodd Rd. R/W West St. Paul, P1N 55118 Ex Pt in Parcel SB of STH R/W Plats 19-53 &55&56 9 t+'A'I'Elt MA7NS $4,014.00 53,690.00 $6,030.00 $12,816.00 $3,258.00 512,942.00 h_,F.SSP1iiNT RA'fES $18.00 Per Front FaoC TOTAL $4,014.00 $3,690.00 $6,030.00 $12,816.00 53,258.00 512,942.00 PAHCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION IAT BLK. `�0. DESCRIPTIO� N0. N0. 27-03500- OPUS Corporation Section 35 Twn 28 Range 23 -- -- 010-82 800 OPUS Center All E of Dodd Rd. of SE 1/4 of SE 1/4 Ex W 14R 9960 Bren Road East of N 6R & less 3 1/3 A to Nermann Ex Hgwy Ex �Ipls., PiN 55440 Pt in Parcel 20.J of STFI R/W Plat No. 19-53 27-03500- Carl & Ladonna Case Section 35 Tan 28 Range 23 -- -- 030-82 540 Dakota Co. Rd. 30 W 14 R of N 6 R of all E of Dodd Road of SE1/4 St. Paul, t•L� 55123 of SE 1/4 27-03600- Ind. School Dist. k197 Section 35 Twn 28 Range 23 -- -- 010-51 1897 Delaware Avenue NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 Ex N 100 Ft. of E 100 Ft. Ex West St. Paul, P1N 55118 W 33 Ft. of N 527 Ft. to Vill Ex Pt in Parcel SB of STH R/W Plats 19-53 & 55 & 56 27-03600- Ind. School Dist. ff197 Section 36 Twn 28 Range 23 -- -- 010-52 1897 Delaware Avenue Pt oF NE 1/4 of SW 1/4 Lying N of Proposed West St. Paul, �1N 55118 Mendota Heights Road 27-03600- James R. Riley Section 36 Twn 28 Range 23 -- -- 010-53 2320 Lexington Avenue So. E 1/2 of SW 1/4 Ex Com at NW Cor SE 1/4 E 167 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Ft. S�15D E 219.75 Ft. S 314.55 Ft W to W Line N to Beg Ex W 150 Ft. of S 333 Ft. Ex Pt on NE 1/4 Lying N of Proposed Mendota Heights Road Ex 9.39 Acres Hgvy Ex Part In Parcel 7C of S1N R/W Plat No. 19-54 thru 58 27-03600- Dale H. & Barbara Glevve Section 36 Twn 28 Range 23 -- -- 010-54 720 Pfendota Heights Road Pt of S 1/2 of SW 1/4 Com 1487 Ft. E of NW Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Cor S 15D E 219.75 Ft. S& Parr To W Line 314.55 Ft. W 260 Ft R 102D 5&"f 321.7 Ft. R 19D SM 250 Ft. to Beg Ex 0.01 Acs Cont in Parcel 7B of STFI R/W Plat No. 19-56 27-U3600- Pierce Butler ET AL Section 36 Tvn 28 Range 23 -- -- 030-54 738 ifendota ilcights Road Pt of S 1/2 of SW 1/4 Com 944 Ft. E& 792 Ft N Mendota Ileights, P1N 5�120 of S4i Cor N 525 Pt. to N Line F; 543 Fe. S 15D G 219.75 Ft. S 314.55 F�. W 599.9 Ft. to Qeg F.x P[ E of Line Com SF. Cor W 2G0 Ft R 102D 58?f 321.7 Ft R 19D SM 250 Ft. to NE Cor Also E 150 Ft of W 944 Ft. of SW 1/4 of Sw 1/4 Ex S 792 Ft F.x Pt in Parcel 7A oC 5771 R/W Plats 19-55 & 19-56 WATER D1nINS 512,654.00 $630.00 5z3,940.00 $7,218.00 $4,104.00 $1,SQ0.00 $11,448.00 TOTAL 512,654.00 $630.00 523,940.00 57,218.00 $4,104,00 51,800.00 SI1,448.00 >;.a: • s>t .: J. <._.: . , . . . .. .. :.�... . r ' J � � 1 � . J / r ! ! r , f�: ' � ` .. P�RCEL REPUTED ON�ER AND \0. DFSCRIPTION 27-03600- OPUS Corporation 040-54 800 OPUS Center 9900 Bren Road East Mpls., MN 55440 27-03600- Irving Clark 060-54 297 Laurel Avenue St. Paul, MN 55102 SUBDIVISION Section 36 Tvn 28 Range 23 W 460 Ft of N 1/2 of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 Ex Pt in Parcel 205 of STH R/W Plat No. 19-53 Section 36 Twn 28 Range 23 E 560 Ft of S 1/2: E 860 Ft of S 132 Ft of N 1/2: & W 944 Ft of N 525 Ft Ex W 460 Ft & Ex E 150 Ft all in SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 Ex Hgwy Ex 1.38 Acs Contd in Parcel 207 of STH R/W Plat No. 19-55 LOT BLK. N0. N0. WATER MAINS $8,280.00 56,012.00 TOTAL 58,280.00 56,012.00 3128,196.00 _ . •� .. , , . ,. ..,,. ,. .. ...,-r- .�,_ , J� S CITY Or MIsNDOTA Ii�IGHTS MLMO October 10, 1985 � / T0: Mayor, City Council and City �, �mir��tr tor ��/'� � FROM: Paul Berg, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Modified CAO Site Plan Review for 754 Woodridge Drive INTRODUCTION North Star Services has submitted plans and a building permit application on behalf of the Andrew 0'Brien family who res�ide at 754 Woodridge Drive. This property lies within the boundaries of the Critical Area Ordinance. DISCUSSION The majority of the work proposed will be done on the interior of the home with the exception of constructing an entry foyer addition, which is well in excess of the 40 foot setback from the 40� slope or bluff line. However, this addition requires Council review and approval of the modified CAO site plan prior to issuance of a building permit. Staff has suggested to the builder and homeowner that it would not be necessary to attend the October 15th Council meeting. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council approval of the modified CAO site plan and suggests waiver of the �100 CAO fee. ACTION REQUIRED If Council wishes to implement the statf recommendation, they should pass a motion approving the moditied site plan and waiver of the fee for same. PRB:madlr CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO October 10, 1985 T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Fraz � City Admini r o '/ SUBJECT: Metropolitan Signif icance Review of Homart Office Development in Bloomington Attached is a letter from Metropolitan Council Chair Sandra Gardebring, informing us that the Council is commencing a metropolitan significance review of the proposed Homart Office development near the intersection of 494 and France Avenue in west Bloomington. This review was initiated on request of the City of Edina. The proposed development is for 26.3 acres, with an office development of approximately 1.5 million square feet of space and a hotel with 350 rooms, plus parking for 5100 vehicles. As a local government adjacent to the City of Bloomington, we have been notified per the procedures of the Metropolitan Significance Act. I am assuming that since the development is at the far west side of Bloomington, we would not have much interest in the issue. Consequently, I have not attached the other materials from the Metropolitan Council, and have not scheduled this for discussion as a regular agenda item, but merely brought it to your attention. KDF:madlr October 3, 1985 Kevin D. Frazell, Administrator City of Mendota Heights 750 S. Plaza Dr. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 RE: Commencement of Metropolitan Significance Review of Homart Office Development, Bloomington Metropolitan Council Referral No. 12704-4 Dear Mr. Frazell: Metropolitan Cou��cil 300 Metro Square Building Seventh and Robert Streets St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 Telephone (612) 291•6; Enclosed are the initiating documents, order of commencement, and a preliminary schedule for a metropolitan significance review of the proposed Homart Office Development near the intersection of Interstate-494 and France Av. in Bloomington. This review was initiated by the city of Edina. Please examine these documents carefully. In particular, note that the sponsor, initiator, situs governmental unit and interested parties may submit preliminary statements within 20 days following the issue of the order of commencement. This deadline is Oct. 22, 1985. If you need further information or Schoettler (291-6411) who will be significance review. Sincerely, � Sandra S. Gardebring, Chair SSG:emp Enclosures have any questions, please contact Jim principal reviewer for this metropolitan An Equal Opportunily Empioyer � p Consulting Planners One Graveland Terrace (612 377-353 Minneapoiis Minnesota 55403 Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban/I ncorporated �. ••� u DATE: Octaber i3, i985 TQ: Mayor and City Council, City of Mendota Heights FROM: Haward Dahl.gren, Ci�y Planning Consultant RE: Southeast Area, Suggested Standards for Impl.ementing Comprehensive . Plan Changes Since the hearing on Octaber 1, we have spoken with some Councilmember� and the City Administra�or in an effort to determine the specific policies and regulations whieh migh� be agreed upon to imple�nent the changes in the Comprehensive Plan�for the Southeast Area as directed by the Couneil. As a result of tMese discussions the fbllowing items were identified as items of coneern: 1) The area slated for change to High Density Residential in the B1 Can;cept would al.low for elase to 1,000 units at full development. This represents the only area of any.significant size in the City where such a land fase ehange will oceur. This is t,herefore the one opportunity r�noaining to achieve a variety of housing types to serve the varied needs of' ex.i.siing and future eitizens. 2) The prospect of having 592 units of a single housing type was ques�ioned, both aes�hetically and Pi�etionally. � 3} There ought ta be a method of eonirol to Iimit the seale of pc>tentially massive apartment-typ� structures. �) No single type of uni� should daninate the I�R area as a whale. Were a single family plat proposed that wauld involve several hundred identical single family homes, we would be rightly concerned. 5} High qual,ity design (the g+�neral aesthetic impact) is best aehieved through the use of highly compeient arehiteets, landseape architects, glanners, and engi.neers. 6) A high quality, s�uall scale conmereial development at the intersection of Dodd Road and Mendata Heights Road m3.ght be considered 6 if it is geared to the needs and seale of the surrounding neighbarhood and not to the freeway traffic. This would be particularly desirable {and necessary} if a senior citizen hausin� projeet were deve3.aped adjacent to it. There appears to be a degree of consensus on these objectives, and they could be earried out hy means of the following standards, as reviewed at aur informal meeting: 1} Limit the size of apartment struetures ta 24-unit buildings or smaller, exeep� by conditional use permit. 2) Limit the number of repeti.tive three-story buildings in a given project ta half the uriits in the projeet, or a maximum of 2Q0 to �50 units, 3) Set the maximum gross der�sity for the HR area at 8 unztslaere so as to eneaurage a variety of densities (6 to 10 u/a) within a given develapment in a High I}ensity Resa.dentia2 land use area. �} Amend the Zoning Qrdinanee to pravide a PUD Zoning Distriet whieh provides zoning approval to a specific development plan. 5} The City should eneourage all developers to employ gaod designers ta carefully and properly prepare any specific developinent projeet. We also met on Thur�day, October 10, to review the forgoing concepts with Jim Ri3ey; Mike Thompson; Riley's new arehiieet, Steve Young, of Young & Wilz; and Ann Aeuring, af Westwood Planning & Engineering, Ri.ley's planning fi.rm. Mr. Riley indicated his willingness to work with the City toward this approach. The entire area of HR and MR land use south of Mendota Heights Road and east af Dodd Road would yield approxim�tely 924 units, 604 urrits being in the HR designatian, half of which {302 unitsj eould be �hree-story �'''�`f�builda.ngs. The reroainin� 320 units would be in the MR area, at lawer densities and smaller buildings, Were these standards to be applied ta the Riley property in the Sautheast Area according to the batandar�y line agreed upon by �he Counei.2 at their last meeting, the property would be da.vided between HR and MR designations in roughly a two-to-ane propartian. The western 2t3, abaut �!7 aeres, wauld yield 376 units in the HR area, of wha.ch 1$8 (half) could be three-stary apar�tment buildings, the rem�inder in other building types. The eastern 1/3, abou� 23 acres, would yield g2 units of lower rise, lower ra.se buildings, for a total af 468 units,-compared to 59� units he is presently proposing. CITY Or MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO October 11, 1985 T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D: F 1� � City Admi strafdr SUBJECT: Appointment to Position of Utility Leadman The promotion of Tom Olund to Public Works Superintendent created a vacancy in the position of Utility Leadman. Since the position will include a 50� per hour premium pay, upon certification as a Wasterwater Operator, the job is considered a promotion. Therefore, per the terms of the labor contract, it was posted at the garage for five days. Three employees, John Neska, George Noack, Jr., and Mike Maczko, f iled letters of int�r�s't with the Public Works Director by the time of the deadline. Our labor contract stipulates that where job qualifications are equal, seniority shall be the determining criteria in job promotions. Of the three, John Neska is the senior employee. He has been with the City for slightly over ten years, eight in the street department, and two in the parks department. He served as street leadman for six years. Public Works Director Danielson, Public Works Superintendent Olund, and I are confident that John will be able to perform the job capably. Therefore, we recommend his appointment. At present, John will be appointed as Utility Maintenance Worker. His actual "promotion" to Utility Leadman will take place when he is certif ied, and we will seek Council action ratifying that appointment at that time. ACTION REQUIRED Motion to appoint John Neska to the position of Utility Maintenance jdorker. KDF:madlr ::; 2�� ., CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO T0: City Council FROM: Kevin D. r z�� City Admi istrator October 11, 1985 SUBJECT: Timing in Public Hearings for South East Area Issues A 7:30 public hearing has been called for the multi-family revenue bonds for the Riley apartment project, and an 8:OO.o'clock hearing for the rezoning and conditional use permit for the Tandem development. `� Mayor Lockwood has a conflict, and will not be able to arrive at the .� meeting until approximately 9:00 P.M. It would seem to me that Council would not want to take final action on either of the above issues until Bob is present for the discussion and vote, and also you 'would likely want to post- pone any action until affer you have completed work on item no. 8ci, Review of the South East Area Comprehensive Plan amendments. This will leave two options for the public hearings: l. Conduct the public hearings at the published times, then table ��;. action until later in the meeting. 2. Announce that the public hearings will not be conducted until later in the meeting when Mayor Lockwood has arrived, and the Council has completed work on the South East Area Comprehensive Plan amendments. This should present no legal problem, as long as the presiding officer of the meeting makes these announcements at approximately the published public hearing times. RECOMMENDATION I would recommend that Council go with option 2, po.stponing the public hearing until later in the meeting. It is likely that most people who appear to offer comments for either of the public hearings are going to be interested in waiting to see what subsequent action Council takes on the items. KDF:madlr D� �OTA �C��ll�l T l� PE.ANNIiVG SERVtCES/PHYStCAL DEVEtOPMENT ��,� lJH1�VINl.VVIV1 i �uv�nivivi�rvi S..�rvi�n �a� '�,� ;; '� �4 Y, � -' 1�`;,� • ;,;�° _,� k'' :�}1 f F�:_ `�� •� , MEHORANDUM . , f T0: DAKOTA COUNTX COMMUNITIES FROM: DAK.OTA COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES DATE: QCTOBER Il, 1985 . � JEFFREY J. CONNELL DIRECTOR tsa2t asz�oz�s IDUU 1'1VV T. �q' 11Hb I INI�J, MINNtJV 1 H��U;S;i The Dakota County i.ibzary Board is sgansaring three inforrnatianal meetings to receive comments on its dra�'t Library FaciliCy P].an. The informational meetings wiZl be heZd as follows: Monday, October Z$ Apple Valley City �iall 7:00 P.M. Tuesday, October 29 ��/ Wednesday, Qctober 30 '7� 14200 Cedar Ave. Hasti.ngs Library 830 Vermi].lion Street West St. Pau1 Library 400 East Emerson Ave. 7;Q0 P.M, 7:00 P.M. The County Library Board is interested in hearing any camments yau may have concerning �he La.brary Facili� Plan and County Library Facilities. If you cannot attend any of the three informational meetings, please direcG your comments or questians ta Ken Harringtont Dakota Gounty Planning Services, I560 IIwy. 55, Hastings, MPI 55033 (437-0225). We 7.00k forward Go hearing your concerns about the draEt Library Facility F2an and the County's Library Facili.ties. - KH:vk AN EQUAL OPpORTUNITY EMPI.OYER f�IETROPO�1TAt1 IUAITE CO(1TRt�L comr�v��on Twin Cities Fkeca October 11, 1985 Mr. Kevin Frazell City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mr. Frazell: �;'lf� 7 -. .�., '� `:J ,hw l�,,rf �y • tJ How about breakfast and some scintillating converaation about ssssludge processing or any other related subject (euphemisms preferred) which may concern us all. I would like to hear from YOU. Perhaps you F�ould liY.e to hear from us? Ours is a changing organi"zation. One of the most vital and important part of that change is the interest of the Commissioners and me to involve community leaders more fully in issues that affect all of us. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has nearly finished very significant rnanagement changes. A thorough study of all of our rate systems may be complete by the time we meet. The success of these two efforts has been helped considerabl_y by significant contributions from a num'ber of communities. Thanks to everyone fo.r that support! We want to continue the effort to develop lines of communication between our agency and the communities F�� serve. I trust that you F�ill want to be a part of this effort to mak� our "business" a more responsive and a more progressive public agency. Please join me at the Pannekoeken Huis-Sytje's, 1505 South Robert St., �West St. Paul, MN, at 7:30 a.m. on Tuesday, October 29. Breakfast will be Dutch treat. Sincerely, � — Peter E. Meintsma Chairman PEM:LS:AM P.S. Please pass this invitation on to your Council and appropriate staff . 350 Metro Square t3uilding, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 612-222-II423 r �• . �' � --� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO October 11, 1985 T0: Mayor, City Council and City i��ator FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Lexington Avenue Bike Trail Job No. 8410 DISCUSSION: At the August 20th City Council meeting Councilmember Blesener stated that she had received complaints that the newly constructed bike trail adjacent to the pond at Lexington and Marie Avenues was unsafe. Council directed that the matter be sent to the Park and Recreation Commission for review and recommendations. Staff presented the problem to the Commission at their September meet- ing and the Commission requested further study by staff (see attached memo). The matter was again put before the Commission at their October meeting, but that meeting was ong and the matter was tabled. The Commission, although they did not take any formal action on the request, did not appear to feel there was a serious safety problem. I very much doubt whether at a future meeting the Commission is going to recommend spending any park funds to establish a barrier along the pond. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Accept the non-action of the Parks Commission, with the under- standing that nothing will be done (ie. the pond area Wri.11 stay as it is). 2. Direct staff to order installation of plantings as suggested in the memo from Jim Danielson to the Parks Commission, or to design some other solution. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has no recommendation on this issue. ACTION REQUIRED: This memo is for information only, to allow Council to respond to complaints or to act independent of a Park and Recreation Commission recom- mendation if they so desire. CITY OF MENDOTA HGIGHTS MEMU T0: Mayor and City Council October 11, 1985 FROM: Kevin D. Fraze �'� City Admini ator SUBJECT: Multi-Family Housing Bonds for Mendota Heights Associates INTRODUCTION At the meeting of September 17th, Council passed resolutions calling for October 15th public hearings on a series of four -$10 million multi-family housing bond issues. Proceeds of these bonds would be used by Mendota Heights Associates to construct 592 units of rental housing in the southeast section of the City. Council should hold the required public hearings, then consider action of the resolutions giving preliminary approvals. DISCUSSION Attached is a copy of the first resolution for the Mendota Heights I Apartments Project. As the subsequent four resolutions are identical, except being for MH II, MH III, and MH IV, we have not attached copies. However, they are in the Mayor's signature file. � Also attached is Exhibit A, the Housing Program which identifies how the bond issue will contribute to the City's housing objectives. Incidentally, the 118 of the 592 units that will be reserved for those with incomes at 80� or less of the metropolitan area median, coupled with the 45 such units already in place at Lexing- ton Heights, will more than fulfill our "fair share" goals in the Housing element of . our Comprehensive Plan. � It is contemplated that Council will not be taking action on the resolutions, until it has decided on specific amendments to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the southeast area of the City. Council will not have an opportunity to review thc specifics of the Riley project before being asked to act on the resolutions. This seeming dilemma c<zn be resolved by the fact that Section 2 of the resolution clearly states that preliminary approval of the bond issue does noC obligate the City to give approval of final issuance, should Council decide it is not in the best interest of the City to do so. Council would also have the option to reduce the size of the issue. As noted at previous meetings, final City approval is contingent upon approval by the Metropolitan Council, and the.Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. The process takes a minimum of 30 days, so November 19th is the earliest Council could approve final issuance. The bonds must be issued by the end of the year, or new Treasury regulations on "low-income" rentals take effect that would result in a much less desireable project. To delay final approval past November 19th could make it difficult to execute the bond sale prior to January lst. -z- Hopefully, by the time oF final approval on November 19th, the developer wi11 have a proposal that meets the objectives and guidelines as incorporated by Council into the Comprehensive P1an �imendmenCs Cor the southe��st ar.e��. ALTERNATIVGS After conducting the public hearing, Council would have the Following alternatives: 1. Decline to pass the resolutions giving preliminary approval, in effect, denying bond financing for the project. 2. Table action on the resolutions until an acceptable development plan has been approved by Council. Given the time constraints, this could delay issuance until after January lst, placing the project under much less favorable Federal regulations. 3. Approve all, or a portion, of the four resolutions giving preliminary approval. ' :a{:i: �:�:� RECOMMENDATION If Council feels that some multi-family rental units will be constructed on the subject property, and if Council determines that multi-family housing bonds are an acceptable vehicle for financing those units, then staff recommends Alternative 3. However, in taking such action, Council should be very clear the approval for final bond issue, in whole or in part, will be contingent upon adoption of an acceptable development proposal, and that the City assumes no obligation or liabilit}= for costs the developer, bond counsel, or bond underwriter may incur in proceeding to develop the bond issue. The developer will also be obligated For the City expenses of calling hearings. (Usually $2,500 per issue, however �5,000 should cover the four proposals). ACTION REQUIRED Action per one of the alternatives identified above. ,_, � .�.,. ,�: KDF:madlr BND/mendotl Draft 3 EXHIBIT A PROGRAM FOR A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT UNDER CHAPTER 462C MH I, MH II, MH III AND MH IV APARTMENTS PROJECT Section l. Statutory Authority. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (the "Act"), the City of Mendota Heights (the "City") has been authorized to develop and administer programs of multifamily housing developments under the circumstances and within the limitations set forth in the Act. Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.07 provides that such programs for multifamily housing developments mayxN. be financed by revenue bonds issued by the City. A°�: Section 2. The Program. The City has received a pro- posal from MH I, MH II, MH III, MH IV, all Minnesota part- nerships to be formed in which Mendota Heights Associates, a Minnesota general partnership or another partnership of which Mendota Heights Associates is a general partner, will be a partner (the "Developers") that, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.05, subdivision 2, the City approve a program providing for the acquisition of land and construc- tion of approximately five hundred and ninety-two (592) units of rental housing (the "Housing Units") on a 69.7 acre site, to be constructed in four phases of one hundred and forty-eight (148) units each. The first phase will be owned and operated by MH I partnership, the second by MH II part- nership, the third by MH III partnership, and the fourth bya�r MH IV partnership. The proposed project will be located on�� part of the South 1815.00 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of Sec-� tion 36, Township 28, Range 23, and the part of the East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of South 26, Township 28, Range 23. More particularly this Project will be located on the south side of Mendota Heights Road between Dodd Road and Delaware� in the City. The proposed development is expected to con-�'' sist of more than one building. It is expected that each"� phase of the development will contain 72 one-bedroom units of which six units will be equipped for the handicapped, and 76 two-bedroom units. Approximate initial rentals for the Housing Units are expected to range from $455 to $660 per month for one-bedroom and two-bedroom units. Rentals vary depending on the location of the Unit within the building and the number of bathroom facilities within the Unit. It°-�� is contemplated that all Housing Units will be in compliance�'�� with all applicable zoning ordinances and other applicable"' land use regulations, including any urban renewal plan or development district plan, and including the state building _,.�-_ _ _ . - - ,..�-�...-,..:�. _. . _ -- --- _... a:=�.-- _�.- _ - ��-�. -� -.----_ inc].uding the state building code as set Eorth under Minnesota Statutes, Sectian 16.83, et. seq. Section 3. Income Limits. To the extent nece�sary to further the pol2cy of economic integration the Housing Units will be designed �o be a�fordable by persons and families with adjusted gross income nat in excess of the iimits set for�h in Minnesota Statutes Section 462C.03, subdivi.sion 2. Twenty percent {20�) af the 592 Housing Units will be specifically reserved for tenants whose incomes are not greater than eighty percent (80�) o� the median family in- come estimated by the United States Department af Housing and Urban Deve].opment for the Minneapolis-St. Paul standard metrapolitan statistical area. Sectior► �. Need far �he Program; Fiaw the Pragram Meets the Needs of Low and Moderate Income Families. In estab- lzshinq this multifamily housing program {�,he "Program"), the City has considered the goals and information contained in the City's Ghapter 462(cj Housa.ng Plan adopted on October 19, 1982 (the "Housing Plan"j. The City has hausing needs in �erms of additional af�ordable, safe and sanitary housing as reflected in data availahle to the City and contained in part in the Plan. Consi�ten� with �he local housing needs evidenced i.n this Program, the praposed Praject will enahle the City to meet its hou�ing goals by (i) providing addi- tional affordable housing wi�h rents, amenities, ccanstruc- tion and lacata.on not otherwise available to the same extent and land use; {ii) encouraging low income housing throughout the City; and (iii) praviding an alterna�ive to singZe family home ownership �or those persons who are or w,ill work in the various existing and �uture businesses in the area. The Ciry has further con�idered other Eactors such as (i) the availability and a�fordability a� ather government housing pragrams; (ii) the availability and affordabi.lity o� private market Einancing �ar �he canstruction af multifamily hou�ing units; (iii) the recent housing trends and future housing �eeds af the City; and (iv) papulatian and unemploy- ment trends and projections a£ future population trends and Euture employment needs. B�.sed on a review oE the �ore- going, the City nas concJ.uded that there is a need far the Pragram to help ciiversiEy hou�ing option� in the City and ta provide affordable housing to camplemen�.expandislg employ- ment opportunities within the City. The City addi.tionally cancludes that the Program is needed ta and will Eurther the sta�ewide housing policy af encourag.ing private industry to assi.st in provi.ding decent, safe and sanitary rental housing at affordable rentals to (i} the handicapped, (ii} minori- ties, (iii) household� headecl by women and (iv) hauseholds with law and moderate income. The Program meets the needs low and moderate income families by providing a varie�y oE Housing Unit types and designs at reasanable rentals, The - 7. - Program also is also subject to the requirements of Section 3 hereof . Section 5. Method of Financing. The City expects to issue an aggregate �otal o� $40,000,000 of its multi�amily housing revenue bonds (the "Bonds") and loan the proceeds to the �evelopers for• the purpose of providing construction and ,. long-term financing for the Project and related reserve funding and administrative and band issuance costs. It is expected that the Bonds will be issued in four series af approximately $10,000,000 each to finance each phase af the development as i�erein set forth. The Bonds will be issued upon such terms and conditions as set forth herein and as may be agreed upon in writing between the City, the oriqinal purchaser of the Bonds and �he Developers. It is cantempla.ted that the Bonds shall contain a maturity of approximately twenty-three (23) years. The first series af Bonds are expected to be issued within twelve (12) months after adaption of this Program. A public offering of �he Bands is contemglate�, which said Bands may be additionally �ecured in a manner approved by the City and original purchaser{s}. Insofar as �he City will or r�ay be contracting with underwriters, legal counsel, band counsel, a trustee, and others, all of whom will be reimbursed from Bond proceeds and revenues generated by the Program, no administrative costs will be paid frorn the City's budge� with respect to this Pragram. The Bands will nat be general obli.gation bands of the City, but are expected to be paid from the properties ar credit pledged to the paymen� thereo�. I�. is no� contemplated that any additional. financing or contributions on the part o� the City will be needed for the campletion of the Project ar for the operation o� the Pra- gram. It is expected t�hat the Program can be implemented with- out subjecting some or all of the obligations thereafter to be issued by the .Minnesota Housing Finance Agency ta federal income tax. Secti.on 6. Standards and RecLuirements Rel.ating to Com- pliance with the Act. The following standards and require- ments shall apply wi�h respect �o the operation of the Praj- ect by the Developers pursuant �o this Program; (1) Substantially all of the proceeds o� the sale of the Bonds wili be used �o finance the Project, which will provide approximately five hundred and ninety-two {592) residential Housing Units and rela�ed amenities. - 3 - The funds will be made available to the Developers pur- suant to the terms of the Bond offering, which may include certain covenants to be entered into between the City and the Developers. ' (2) The Developers or subsequent owner of the Project, will not reject an application from a proposed tenant because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age or status with regard to public assistance or disability. (3) No Housing Unit may be in violation of appli- cable zoning ordinances or other applicable land use regulations, including any urban renewal plan or devel- opment district plan, and including the state building code as set forth under Minnesota Statutes, Section 16.83, et seq. �, (4) Pursuant to Section 462C.05, subdivision 2 of the Act, at least twenty percent (20�) of the Housing Units will be held for occupancy by families or individ- uals with Adjusted Gross Income (as defined in the Act) not in excess of eighty percent (80�) of the median family income as estimated by the United States Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Development for the Minne- apolis-St. Paul metropolitan area. (5) The Developers will enter into a Regulatory Agreement with the City to ensure compliance with the Program and that the level of low and moderate income occupancy requirements of the Act, herein specified, will be maintained for the period of time speciEied by the Act and the Internal Revenue Code, in order to re- tain the tax exempt status of the Bonds. �� Section 7. Evidence of Compliance; Method of Monitoring Implementation. The City may require from the Developers or such other person deemed necessary at or before the issuance of the Bonds, evidence satis�actory to the City o� th�� ability and intention of the Developers to complete the� Project, and evidence satisfactory to the City of compliance with the standards and requirements �or the making of the financing established by the City, and in connection there- with, the City or its representatives may inspect the rele- vant books and records of the Developers in order to confirm such ability, intention and compliance. In addition, the City may periodically require certification from either the Developers or such other person deemed necessary concerning compliance with various aspects of this Program. � Section 8. Marketing of Program to Ensure Equal Housinq Opportunities. It is expected that the Program will be - 4 - affirmatively marketed to ensure equal housing opportunities for minority households, households headed by women and handicapped persons. The Developers is additionally expected to use its best efforts to provide an opportunity for minorities and women to participate in the production and construction of the Housing Units contemplated by this Program. Section 9. Severability. The provisions of this Pro- gram are severable and if any of its provisions, sentences, clauses or paragraphs shall be held unconstitutional, con- trary to statute, exceeding the authority of the City or otherwise illegal or inoperative by any court of competent jurisdiction, the decision of such court shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions. Section 10. Amendment. This Program shall be a com- ponent of and amendment to the Plan as recognized by the Act. The City shall not amend this Program while Bonds are outstanding to the detriment of the holders of such Bonds. - 5 - PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROGRAM AND THE ISSUANCE BY THE CITY OF ITS MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS (MH I APARTMENTS PROJECT) ZN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF UP TO $10,000,000 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota (the "City"), will meet on Tuesday, October 15, 1985 at 7:30 p.m., at the City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, in Mendota Heights, Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on a proposal that the City adopt a housing program (the "Program") pro- viding for the issuance of the City's Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (MH I Apartments Project) (the "Bonds") in an amount of up to $10,000,000 to finance the acquisition, construct�ion and installation of an approximately 148 unit multifamily rental project (the "Project") together with related issuance costs, to be located on part of the South 1815.00 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 36, Township 28, Range 23, and the part of the East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of South•,26, Township 28, Range 23. More particularly this Project�will be located on the south side of Mendota Heights Road between Dodd Road and Delaware in the City. The Project will be reserved for rental in part by persons of low and moderate income, with at least 20 percent of the units held open for occupancy by families or individuals with adjusted income not in excess of 80 percent of the median family income estimated by the United States Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Development for the Minne- apolis/St. Paul Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area. The Project will be developed and initially owned and operated by MH I, �a Minnesota partnership to be formed in which Mendota Heights Associates, a Minnesota general partnership will be a general partner or another partnership of which Mendota Heights Associates will be a general partner. The Bonds will be limited obligations of the City of Mendota Heights, payable solely from the revenues of the Project and certain other security pledged therefor; the Bonds and the interest thereon will not constitute or give rise to a charge against the City's general credit or taxing powers or constitute a pecuniary liability of the City. Copies of the Program and the City's Housing Plan are on file and available �or inspection in the office of the City Clerk in City Hall. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROGRAM AND GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROJECT AND ITS FINANCING, UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF THE PROGRAM TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY FOR REVIEW WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota (the "City") is authorized, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chap- ter 462C (the "Housing Act") to develop and administer multifamily housing programs pursuant to a housing plan, which may be financed by the issuance of revenue bonds of the City; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted the City of Mendota Heights Housing Plan (the "Housing Plan") pursuant to and in conformance with the provisions of the Housing Act and has held a public hearing thereon, after at least 30 days' pub- lished notice thereof, and after review and comment by the Metropolitan Council thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council (the "Council") has determined that it is in the best interests of the City and in further- ance of the City's goals established in the Housing Plan that the City amend the Housing Plan, by approving and adopting a multifamily housing revenue bond program entitled "Program for Multifamily Housing Development Under Chapter 462C - MH I Apartments Project" (the "Program"); and WHEREAS, under the Program the City will issue its reve- nue bonds in an amount of up to $10,000,000, to finance the acquisition, construction and installation of an approx- imately one hundred and forty-eight (148) unit multifamily rental housing development (the "Project") together with related issuance costs, to be located on part of the South 1815.00 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 36, Township 28, Range 23, and the part of the East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of South 26, Township 28, Range 23. More particularly this Project will be located on the south side of Mendota Heights Road between Dodd Road and Delaware in the City by MH I, a Minnesota partnership to be formed in which Mendota Heights Associates will be a general partner or another partnership of which Mendota Heights Associates, a Minnesota general partnership will be a general partner (the "Developer"); and WHEREAS, the Project will be reserved for rental in part by persons of low and moderate income, with at least 20 Anyone desiring to be heard during this public hearzng will be afforded such an opportunity. All others interested may �ile written comments with the City Clerk prior to the date of the hearing. The hearing will provide an appor- tuni�y for persons to express their views with respect to adoption of the Program, the issuance of the Bonds hy the City and as �o the location and nature of the Project. - 2 - percent of the units held open for occupancy by families or individuals with adjusted gross income not in excess of 80 percent of the median family income estimated by the United States Department oF Housing and Urban Development for the Minneapolis/St. Paul Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area; and . WHEREAS, the remainder of the Project not so reserved will be affordable to persons and families with adjusted gross income not in excess of those limits set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.03 subdivision 3 only to the extent determined necessary to further the policy of economic integration; and WHEREAS, the Program is in conformance with the provi- sions of the Housing Act; and WHEREAS, the City has held a public hearing on the Pro- gram on October 15, 1985, after at least 15 days' published notice thereof and after submission of the Program to the Metropolitan Council for review on or before the publication date of the Notice of Public Hearing; and WHEREAS, the Council and the staff of the City has re- viewed the Program and believes that the Program will in- crease the supply in the City of decent, safe and sanitary residential rental dwellings and that the Program is in furtherance of the housing policies of the City; and WHEREAS, neither the City nor the State of Minnesota shall be liable on the Bonds, and the Bonds shall not be a debt of the City within the meaning of any state constitu- tional provision or statutory limitation, and will not con- stitute or give rise to a charge against the general credit or taxing power of the City or a pecuniary liability of the City, nor shall the Bonds be payable out of any funds or properties other than those provided as security therefore; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota: Section 1. The Program, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby approved and adopted by the City. Section 2. The City gives preliminary approval to the issuance of its Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (MH I Apartments Project) in an aggregate principal amount of up to $10,000,000 to provide financing for the acquisition, construction and installation of the Project, together with related issuance costs. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the adoption of this resolution shall not be deemed to establish a legal obligation on the part of the City or - 2 - its Council to issue or cause the issuance of such revenue bonds. The City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not to issue the Bonds, or issue the Bonds in an amount less than the amount referred to in this Section, should the City at any time prior to issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interests of the City not to issue the Bonds, or to issue the Bonds in an amount less than the amount referred to in this Section, or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. Section 3. The staff of the City has taken all actions necessary for review and comment on the amendment to the Housing Plan by the Metropolitan Council and is directed to take those actions necessary for review of the Program by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency pursuant to the re- quirements of the Act. ` Section 4. The staff of the City is hereby authorized and directed to take all steps necessary and desirable to proceed to develop the Program and the financing therefor, and to prepare for implementation of the Program at the earliest possible date, provided, however, that no bonds shall be issued pursuant to the Program until the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency shall have had an opportunity to review the Program in accordance with the Housing Act. Section 5. The Developer has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all direct and indirect costs in- curred by the City in connection with the Program and the Project, whether or not the Project is carried to comple- tion, whether or not the Program is accepted by the Agency; and whether or not the City by resolution authorizes tlie� issuance of the Bonds will be paid by the Developer upon request. PASSED AND APPROVED this 15th day of October, 1985. ATTEST: City Clerk - 3 - Mayor .S•i :: •� JOH N R. Du BOIS Communications Consulting Engineer Registered Professional Electrical Engineer October 14, 1935 Chief Dennis Delmont Mendota Heights Police Department 750 Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Chief Delmont: 7005 Heatherton Trail Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Telephone (612) 927-6810 Attached is a cost quotation covering the new Public Works Radio System for Mendota Heights. Except for the items that are unique to Mendota Heights, the prices are from the successful bid by Communications Center to ISD191, to which Mendota Heights was a named participant. Three of the items on the quote are VHF antenna system components for the new West St. Paul/ Mendota Heights police satellite voting receiver that will also be located at the water tower. They are not a part of the Public Works radio system but I recommend that you get West St. Paul's approval to purchase these items now, because I believe that we can save approximately $500 in antenna installation fees by having the VHF antenna system and your 800 MHz base antenna at the water tower installed at the same time. The VHF items are: Number 1. 3a 2. 4a 3. P06 Item PD-1167 Antenna LDF12 Trans line Installation Total Cost $ 319.20 $ 646.48 Est $ 300.00 $1,265.68 I further recommend that you accept alternate #7a for $807 instead of �7 at �1,485, for a savings of $678. In addition, I recommend�that you accept alternate #l0a instead of #10 for $990 and alternate #lla for $250 instead of �11 for $150, for a net cost increase of $1,230. I further recommend that the alternate antenna (#l0a) at City Hall (PD-1612) be replaced with a Model PD-110B at an increase in cost of $569. Therefore, the Public Works radio system will consist of the following: � ,:: � � � Page 2 No. 1. 2, � 10. I1. 12. I3. 14, 15 . 16. 17. 18. Item 1 2 3 4 5 � la 8 � l0a l0a lla 12 13 14 15 16 17 John R. DuBois Ttem Model [iase Repeater FX-1175 Quplexer DB-4090 Antenna PD-I136 Trans line � L�F78 OC Control panel Instailation of I - 5 3 Desk sets IDA29-10 Install 7a and overhead speakers Supply and install carttrol line 5 pair Antenna change PD1108 ta PD1612 Base/antJremote unit 70-909 Instailation af �10a ZZ M0�?'iI� radias Install #12 12 Maxrad antennas Install �14 Remove existing 12 radias Final inspectian $00 MNz Total VNF Portion Items 3a and 4a .. � Recommended Total Qrder Price $ 6,600.Q0 328.Q0 1,241.65 1,583.65 ��.ao 1,475.Q0 •.v 807.00 300.OQ .� � 569.Qp 2,120.00 z�o.ao i0,839.36 84Q.00 345.00 60.Op 120.00 200.QQ $ 28,746.16 $ 9b5.6$ $ 29,73.1.84 i John R. DuBois Page 3 In my 1984 remedial recommendations report to you, I estimated that the cost of the 800 MHz radio system for Mendota Heights would cost: No. Task No. Item Est Cost 1. 13 800 MHz Repeater $ 5,500.00 2. 14 12 - 800 MHz Mobiles 14,400.00 3. 15 Back-up base/control station 6,500.00 4. Contingency on 13, 14 and 15 2,640.00 800 MHz System, Total Budget Estimate: $29,040.00 The estimated budget amount ($29,040) approximately equals the cost quotation ($28,746.16) from Communications Center. I recommend that you accept the cost quotation from Communications Center, as modified above, for the new 800 MHz radio system for Mendota Heights. Call me at 348-4081 if you have any questions about this report. Yours sincerely, ... � l , v� -. John R. Du6ois Ph.D. Registered Professional Communications Engineer , Minnesota Registration #7350 JRD/bl cc: Mr. Charles Maas, Communications Center Sgt. Tom Iago, West St. Paul Police Mr. William Craig, West St. Paul City Manager , a. ��`-'`�� . m ons �,,,,,�� a�EM'ER TlIYItiiG1N OF PI[Ob�:VI\ I)MfiTR1It11T(NG INC. October 4, 19$5 John R. DuBois 7005 Heatherton Tr�i1 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Subject: Mendota Heigttts 8Q4 Mhz Radio System Attached are the figures on the system as rebised, including item 3a Antenna, item 4a transmission line, as adders and alternative on items 7, 1Q,•and 11» We wauld recammend stnangly considering using the alternatives we have proposed. Alternative item 7 is the desk set model, instead of desk consal.es. AlternaCive 1Q is usi.ng an 800 Mhz control station up in the public works office instead of remates. This shauld be cost-effective over the cost of a telephane line installation and �monthly line fees i.n a relatively short time. As previausly advised, we would sub-contract the antenna insta].latians ta Levques Tawer. Due to the imgending cald weather seasan we would recommend moving quickl.y on the isntallation of the antennas and the trenching for the control cable between the tower and the public wortcs buiZding. cc: Mendota Heights File Sincerely, � % ��^, �.C�.ciy( / lLP->_ . Chuck Maas Corrmmunications Center ri� THE COMP.4NY October 15, 1985 i�endota Heights City Council 750 South Plaza Dr. Mendota Heights, MN. 55120 To:The i3onorable Mayor Robert G. Lockwood Mendota Heights City Council For your consideration we have enclosed a Petition signed by three hor.leowners in the south-east corner of Mendota Heights. We thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, THE LENNON COMPANY , , o� � � � �� s, �1 l •L �.ty.,� c �.y � ► � � � Betty Armstrong, Broker RE.4L EST.4TE 47A Signal Hills. St. Paul, Minnesota 55118 (612) 457-8401 - PETITION - WE THE UNDERSIGNED property owners in the Southeast quadrant of Mendota Heights urge you to allow tYye � property generally located between Dodd Rd.,and Delaware Ave; t•�endota Heights Rd. and the new Fre�way # 494, to remain at its present zoning, R-1. We further call to your attention the size of our � lots which all front on Delaware Ave., and vary in depths slightly. (See attached Exhibit A.). In any situation we do not want to be--cut off from any access to the back of our properties. T•�ith any future develop- ment kindly make sure any new construction in this area would never leave our 3 lots land-locked on the westerly end. Thank you for your consideration. W. RaymoiYd �e, � 2579 Delaware Ave Mendota Heights, Nf . � �� .2.�� ichael Kennedy 256'� Delaware �e. Mendota Heights, MN. ,...) ---- . �Y - David Place 2563 Delaware Ave. .Mendota Heights,�MN. � Roxanna Kane . 2579 Delaware Ave. Mendota Heics�ts, MN. 0 � i � _.. 2567 Delaware Av�'�. Mendota Heiqhts� . C�� --��_: Carol Place �� 2563 Delaware Ave. biendota Heights, P�N. C C.. Page No. 2371 October 15, 1985 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held TueBday, October 15, 1985 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendote Heights, Minnesota. Acting Mayor Witt called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Acting Mayor Witt, Councilmembers Blesener, Cummina and Hartmann. Mayor Lockwood had informed the Council that he would be lste. ' AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of the agenda for the meeting including additional items contained in the add-on agenda. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Naya: O APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilme�ber Cummins moved approval of the minutes o� the October 1at meeting. Councilmember Hartmann a�conded the motion. Ayea: 4 Nays: O CONSENT CALENDAR Council�e�ber Hartmann moved approval of the consent calendar as aubmitted and recommended for approval as part of the�regular agenda, along with authorization for execution of all necessary documenta contained therein. a. Acknowledgement of the minutes of the September 19th NDC-4 meeting. b. Acknowledgement of a memo from the City Adminiatrator regarding a metropolitan aignificance review o£ the propoaed Homart Office development in Bloomington. • c. Acknowledgement of the Treasurer's monthly report .. - for September. d. Acknowledgement of the minutes of the September lOth Fark and Recreation Comraisaion meeting. e. Acknowledgement of the Fire Department monthly report £or September. f. Approval of a modified critical area site plan for Page No. 2372 October 15, 1985 an addi�.on at 754 Woodridge Drive, along with waiver of the critical area site plan review application fee. r g. Adoption of Resolution No. 85-81, "RESOLUTION � ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. 83, PROJECT NO. 4," authorizing final payment of �7,365.09 to Orfei & Sons, Inc., for Evergreen Knolla Addition public improvementa � Ayes: 4 Nays; O INTRODUCTIONS h. i. Approval of the List of Claims dated October 15, 1985 and totalling 589,159.96. Approval of the list of contractor licenses, granting licenaea to: J.R. Walker & Sons, Inc. DJ's Hesting & Air Conditioning K.W. Dahm Construction Co. London Construction Co. Pacific Pool and Patio M.B. Enterprises Ouality Design, Inc. Lindstrom Cleaning and Construction, Inc. DJ's Heating & Air Conditioning Excavating License Gas Piping License General Contractor Licen�• General Contractor Licen�- General Contractor Licen�<. General Contractor Lir sl General Contractor Li, s- General Contractor Licena�� Heating & Air Conditioninc Licenae Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Acting Mayor Witt introduced Planning Commission member Bill Burke and Park Commisaion member Robert Le££ert to the audience. AGENDA ORDER Acting Mayor Witt informed the audience that Mayor Lockwood would be unable to be present until approximately 9:00 P.M. and conaequently the hearinga acheduled for 7:30 and 8:00 P.M. would be conducted after the Mayor's arrival. ASSESSMENT ROLL, MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD WATERMAIN Ayea: 4 Nays: O Public Works Director Danielson reviewed his memo regarding the proposed asaeasment roll for Mendota Heights Road wstermain improvements. Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution �o. 85-82, "RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSI �5 FOR WATERMAIN TRUNK LINE ALONG TRUNK HIGHWAY 149 A.,.. MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD." Councilmember Bleaener aeconded the motion. C m �> Page No. 2373 October 15, 1985 Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No. 85-83, "RESOLUTION DEFERRING PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 83, PROJECT NO. 7B)." Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: O PERSONNEL Police Chief Delmont reviewed his memo regarding the Police Sergeant's promotional exam and tentative timeline for the promotion of a Patrol Officer to Sergeant. After brief discussion, Councilmember Hartmann moved to authorize the City Administrator and Police Chief to begin the process of teating for a Sergeant and to advertise and accept applications for a new Patrol O£f icer . Councilmember Cummina aeconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: O COMPUTER STUDY Mr. Dave McCauley, from DSM Information Services, Inc., informed Council that an information ayatem requirement apecification has been prepared and that the next step in the procesa will be to prepare purchase speci£ications. Mr. McCauley reviewed cost estimates and answered questions from the Council and audience. After discussion, Councilmember Hartmann moved to authorize DSM Information Services, Inc. to enter the Implementation Phase of the pro�ect at a fee not to exceed �3,600, study preparation costs to be charged to the budgeted Administration contingency line item. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayea: 4 Nays: O PERSONNEL Council acknowledged a memo from the City Adminiatrator indicating that three public workg employees have epplied for the Utility Leadman pogition. The Adminiatrator recommended that John Neska be appointed Utility Maintenance Worker and that ' hia promotion to Utility Leadman take place after he receives Wastewater Operator Certification. Ayes: 4 Nays: O Councilmember Cummins moved to appoint John Neska to the position of Utility Maintenance Worker. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. rr: , :,E=y �, =:;= Pege 2374 October 15, 1985 MENDOTA POLICE Councilmember Blesener moved to authorize the Mayor CONTRACT and City Clerk to execute the 1986 police contract with the City of Mendota. Acting Mayor Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 � Nays: O C COMMUNICATIONS The Council acknowledged a notice of inetropolitan significance review on the proposed Bloomington Mall o£ America/Fantnsyworld. The Council acknowledged notices of public hearings from the Regional Tranait Board, the Dakota County Library Board and the Metropolitan Waate Control Commission. BIKE TRAIL The Council acknowledged a memo from the Public Works Director regarding the bike trail along the pond at Lexingtan and Marie Avenues. Park Commiasion member Leffert stated that the Commisaion tabled diacusaion an the matter to ita November meeting and asked that Council tak� no action on the matter until the Commission has an opportunity to discuss and make recommendation on the isaue. RECESS HEARING -- TANDEM CORPORATION Acting Mayor Witt called a recess at 8:35 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 8:50 P.M. Acting Mayor Witt opened the meeting for the purpos�� of a public hearing on applications £rom the Tandem Corporation for rezoning and conditional uae permi� for Planned Unit Development. Mr. Dick Putnam, representing Tandem, stated that i�is £irm proposea to develop 137 acres of land owned by the Opua Corporation and Jerry Rauenhorst and loca�.e� west of Delaware Avenue, south o£ the Dodge Nature Preserve, and eaat of Delaware Crosaing into 181 single family reaidential lota. He informed Council that his firm has reviewed aeveral iasuea which we:e brought to their attention by both the City and area residenta: impact of the proposal on the City's Comprehenaive Plan, zoning and park aystem and the impact on neighboring properties. With regard to Cit� issuea, Mr. Putnam stated that the property ia currently zoned R-lA and that hia firm ia requeating rezoning to urban denaity CR-1). He pointed out that lota in Friendly Hilla and Deleware Crosaing range +.n aize from 10,OOa to 15,000 square feet and that t Montgomery Addition conaiata of one-acre lota. He informed the Council that the denaity was also o£ concern to ad�acent property owners who would like the R-lA density retained. Another item of City concern � Page No. 2375 ,* October 15, 1985 was the issue of park needs. Mr. Putnam stated that there is a natural park area between the two ma�or ponda in the £irst phase of the three-phase development, that neighborhood parks exiat in the Friendly Hills erea and the Comprehensive Plan designates e partion of the School Diatrict property as a park site. He indicated that there has been some question about the use of the sho�line area surrounding the ponda and that the final issue of concern expressed waa that of access to neighboring propertiea. In response to thia concern, he stated that the preliminary plat has been revised to provide two pointa of access to the Dodge Nature Preserve, twc accesses to the Weed property and acceas to Delaware Avenue in Phase 3. He stated that the lots nearest tc the Montgomery Addition hsve.been realigned to provide larger lots and a greater feeling of openness. Mr. Putnam informed Council that all of the lots exceed the 15,000 square £oot R-1 lot size requirement. He stated that a couple o£ alternatives were discussed b} the Park Commisaion relative to shoreline area ownership and maintenance, one of which was to not usE any o£ the area around the ponds for park purpoaes. He pointed aut that his firm has deaigned a£lexible area around the ponda that can be made a scenic easement which could be owned by the public or which could be privately owned with an easement restricting property owner use of the area. Mr. Futnam stated that it aeema that the neighbors wauld like to aee the shoreline remain natural rather then manicured by the property ownera. He informed Council that if the aree is to be a public area he would have reservations about having a trail along the ahoreline -- he did not believe this would work well with the more expenaive homes which will likely be conatructed on the affectec lots, the most expensive and desireable lota in the plat Mr. Putnam stated that if approved, the development will be constructed in three phasea which will be developed over a five to six year period. The first � C37 acre) phase is the northerly portion o£ the ' proposed plat and conaists of 57 lots. Mr. Putnam explained that the lota vary in size because he wanted to.provide different £rontages on the same atreet. In response to a question fram Acting Mayor Witt regarding what park and recreation facilitiea, such aa tot lote or open apace, will be available within the plat, Mr. Putnam atated that given the proximity of the Friendly Hillg park and the potential future park southeaat of the propoaed plat area he doea not believe there would be a need for another neighborhood � ;> :�� : � � Page No. 2376 October 15, 1985 park within the plat. Mr. Putnam stated that the Park Commission has recommended thet the first phase of the development F be approved sub�ect to resolution of the shoreline � ownerahip iaeue and that approval of phases two and three be withheld until the Commisaion reviewa the comprehenaive park study and can make a recommendatic on park dedicetion. He informed the Council that he has diacusaed trails with the Commia8ion and that the developera will conatruct a trail between the ponds and through the pro�ect to Delaware Avenue, through the Weed property and back to Huber Drive. Acting Mayor Witt asked for questions and comments from the audience. Mr. Texar, 718 Nava�o Lane, complimented Mr. Putnam o his presentation and asked what good the development will do for the City and how it will af£ect the value of properties in Friendly Hills and Delawsre Crossinr He also felt that the shoreline area should be privately owned and should not be publicly accese '�c� Mr. James Losleben, 815 Hazel Court, asked how many homes could be built under existing zoning. Mr. Bernard Friel asked how much the natural terrain will be altered to accommodate the plat and whether the d�velopera had done any planning under exiating zoning. Mayor Lockwood arrived at 9:05 P.M. Mr. John Campbell, 2348 Apache, noted that 117 of the lota are under 20,000 aquare feet in aize. In response to a question from Council, Mr. Putnam atated that it ia likely that at leaat 3 or 4 builder: will be intereated in constructing homes within the plat and that lots will slso be available for individuals to purchase, however, there will be covenents developed and an architectural control committee so that if an individual buys a lot his house plans would have to be reviewed and npproved by the committee. ,. . Mr. Ulton Duggan, 813 Hazel Court, asked whether l�e developer would agree to a 10 acre park dedicetio o; Phases 2 and 3 if such a dedication were required �y the City, aince Mr. Putnam had indicated that 181 lotr are neceasary becauae of development and improvement coats. - :;;t � Page No. 2377 October 15, 1985 Mr. Charles Mertensotto, 2371 Rogers Avenue, stated th8t the School District property (propoaed park aite; will double in value if the propoaed pro�ect develops, Mr. Losleben suggested that the City will be faced Cwith the situation where the school property is not - available for park or•the neighborhood does not want the aite developed for ballfielda. He asked what the City would do then in terma of parka for thia development. C. CouncilmeMber Cummins commended Mr. Putnam for workinc with the community to reaolve problems but atated that one complaint atill not r�solved ia the concern about the minimum lot size of 15,000 and frontages o£ lesa than 100 feet per lot. He indiceted that while he underatanda the applicant'a desire to create di£ferent aiz�s and ehapes of lota he ia concerned that the minimum lot frontage will be 85 feet at the front yarc setback. He expresaed concern that there are ao many lota of 15,000 and 16,000 aquare feet and felt that the City has an abundance of plats with thoae lot aizes and this is one of the last areas in the City tc have the opportunity to develop larger than average size lots and high quality homea. He stated that he could support the proposal £or the portion of phase one north and west of Huber Drive but would like to see a miniMura of 100 feet of frontage for the remainder of the plat. He also felt that the lot aizea should be increased to a minimum of 17,500 square feet and suggeated that a new zoning district specificying 17,500 square feet be adopted. Councilmember Blesener agreed, stating that she believea it 18 appropriate ta create larger lota, particularly in the northeaat corner and to better accommodete the exiating gredea without having to do e great deal of earth moving. She alao £elt that there ahould be a 30 to 50 foot trail ea8ement eround the ponda to tie in with the City's trail syatem. Mayor Lockwood ngreed that there should be a public easement around the ponds. M�.�Campbell stated that the ponda are protected waters and therefore an environmental assesament workaheet muat be prepared. Administrator Frazell informed Council that the City must prepare an EAW for developmenta in excess of 100 single family homes and thnt the Environmental Qualit} Board has indicated that the workaheet could be done during phase two. C Ayes: 5 Nays: O Ayea: 5 Nays : O _ RECESS There being no further Councilmember Bleaener closed nt 9:57 P.M. Councilmember Hartmann Pege No. 2378 October 15, 1985 questions or comments, moved thnt the hearing be aeconded the motion. Councilmember Blesener moved approval of phase one of the propoaed development contingent upon eliminating one lot per atreet to increase front footagea, increase in the aize o£ the lota nearest the Mantgomery Addition and reviaion of the propoaed cul- de-sac. After discussion, the motion was withdrawn. Councilmember Cummins moved to lay the matter over until the comprehensive pinn has been diacusaed. Acting Mayor Witt seconded the motion. Acting Mayor Witt called a recess at 10:05 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 10:15 P.M. SOUTHEAST AREA/ Mayor Lockwood informed the sudience that on Octob COMPREHENSIVE PLAN lst Council accepted the Planning Commission recommendation on proposed amendmenta to the Comprehenaive Plan relating to the 8outheast area of the City. He atated that he would like to reopen discussion on the propoaed amendments and conaider additionel information. Mayor Lockwood moved to reconsider action taken on October lat on the Southeast Area Comprehenaive Plan changes. Councilmember Witt aeconded the motion. Ayea: 5 Nays: O City Planners Howard Dahlgren and Phil Carlson were present £or the diacusaion. Planner Dahlgren informed the audience that after the last Council meeting, at which the plan amendmenta were approved, he had dia- cusaiona with two of the Councilmembers who were con- cerned about the plan. As the result, additional ideea have been generated regarding plan implementation He_explained that Concept B-1 in the Southeast Area Study was the amendment approved by Council with a �nodified boundary line between medium residential and high reaidential, with densities of 1.6 units per a�r.e for low denaity reaidential, 4 unita per acre medi residentiel denaity and 10 unita per acre high den�._�y reaidentiel. He further atated that Council had determined that the poasibility of developing a local Page No.2379 October 15, 1985 commercial center at Dodd and Mendota Heights Road be held in abeyance. Mr. Dahlgren stated that the two Council members expressed concern over the aize of the multiple ( dwelling development proposed by Mendota Heights Associatea which would conaist of 8- 75 unit atructures,and felt that Council should be able to limit the aize of the structurea in a high density pro�ect. He auggested that one approach would be to permit atructurea of a certain size, for inatance 24 � units per building, and to conaider proposals for larger structurea under a conditional use permit procesa. Another concern expresaed by the Councilmembera waa that the developer propoaea constructing 592 houaing unita of a aingle�type and were greatly concerned that it is important to have a variety of houaing typea and not have up to two-thirds of the entire area uaurped by a aingle type of development. Mr. Dahlgren felt that the City must provide diverse housing optiona for the community, and for that purpoae there should be some variety, rather than 592 unita of one type. He stated that the Councilmembera wanted some type of control over the number of units which could be constructed in the high density classification. C. Another suggestion was to rezone properties in the southeast area to a specific planned unit development so that it would become a contract zone with specific types of uses and size of structures: the developer would then have the right to construct that development according to the PUD plan but could not vary £rom the plan as approved. Under such a circumatance, the City would have apecific control aver auch itema a8 aize, ahape and quality of the atructures and the development proposal would be aub�ect to the public hearing procesa. Mr. Dahlgren stated that it was also the explicit desire af the Councilmembera to change the denaity for HR from 10 units per acre to 8 unita per acre: while aome portiona of a development may have a density of 10 units per acre, othera would then have a denaity of 6 unita per acre to achieve an overall denaity of 8 units per acre. . Mr. Dahlgren then gave a slide presentation illustrating various housing typea. He pointed out that one important item to keep in mind iB that there ia very little opportunity to meke any changes in the Comprehensive Plan from 15,000 square foot single £amily lots: i£ the City is to o£fer a variety o£ housing types at 10 units per acre or less where it �• r,�• would not adversely in the area o£ the of Mendota Heighta Page No. 2380 October 15, 1985 impact any land owner, it would � City contiguoua to I-494 and sou�h Road. He pointed out that the lots in Friendly Hills are � 10,000 square £oot single family lots. The area sout of Mendote Heights Road could be developed as a mix o high quality townhouses at 4 units per acre and high residential, 8 unit per acre density, multiple dwelling units with a atipulated maximum number of units per building. The result would be a variety of structures constructed in accordance with very specific development controla. C. Ayes: S Nays: O .., •a. Mayor Lockwood asked how much of the MR area can really accommodate a large building without radically altering the topography of the land. Mr. Dahlgren respanded that the aite is basically gentle and rolling land and it ia posaible to locate 8 aeventy- five unit buildinga on the aite: the question is whether the Council wanta that many of the aame type of building, all three atories, with the aeme numr~r of units each on one site. Councilmember Witt auggeated thet if the developer were to instead propoae 70 eight-plexea there would be nothing but concrete, blacktop and buildinga and the natural terrain and amenitiea would be deatroyed. Mayor Lockwood read the recommendations contained in the City Planner's report dated October 11th. Councilmember Blesener atated that she did not believ• the recommendations contained enough controls and theh there should be a better understanding of the Council's desires. She £elt Council should define it� goels and ob�ectives for MR and�HR districts and incorporate those goals into the Plan amendments: the amendments should � include Council's goal for the density of the area south of Mendota Heighta Road, S unita per acre averall; e new FUD zoning diatrict ahould be created to allow rezoning on a case by case baaia; the R-3 Diatrict Zoning Ordinance denaity ahould be reduced to a maximum of 8 units per acre; and that all the undeveloped land in the southeast area of the City be developed under the PUD proceas. There was brief discussion over the area on the north aide o£ Mendota Heighta Road deaignated as "Park" in the Comprehenaive Plan. Councilmember Blesener District category. Mayor Lockwood seconded moved to create a PUD Zoning the motion. � Ay�B: 5 Neys: O Ayes: 5 Nays: O Ayes: 5 Nays: O HEARING NEIGHTS HOUSING Page No. 2381 October 15, 1985 Councilmember Slesener moved to amend the R-3 Zoning District ta reduce the density to 8 unite per acre. Cauncilmember Witt $econded the motion, Councilmember B1e�ener moved to dreft a statement far incarporatian in the Comprehenaive Flan amendments which statea t�e goaia and ob�ective� for the s�utheast area of the City, applying specific control to develop�ent which occura, such as providing a diversity a£ hauaing types, retention of the naturel beeuty of the terrein, building sc�le apprapriate ta the t�rrain, multiple family buildinga of 24 unita pe building or lesa except by epecial uae permit, repetitive de�ign atructurea limit�d to a maximum of 250 units and a atrang preference for awner-occupied housing. Councilmember Wftt aeconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins stated that he participated in the discusaions which led to the series o£ changes diacussed tonight and still has misgivings. He atate that he would like to see the land stay aingle family but believes the changea �ust acted upon give the Caunci2 sufficient control to assure maderate �c81e development in the area. Councilmember Blesener mo�ed to amend the Comprehenaive Flan in accardance with Concept B-1, th Gity Planner tn eat�bliah e rea$onable location £or the line between HR and MR to provide an HRlMR diatribution appropriate to establiah en average denaity of 6 units per ecre, and on the basia that each parcel included in Goncept B-1 be designeted as PUD. Mayor Lockwood aeconded the motion. - MENDOTA Mayor Lockwood opened the mesting for the purpose of ASSOCIATES public hearing an applicationa from Mendota Heights BONDS Aasaciatea for preliminsry approval of four applicntions for S10 million each in multiple family houaing bonda. Mr. Jaraes Riley, repreaenting Mendata iieighta AsBo�ie�tesr along with architect Steve Yaung, were present far the discuaesion. Mr. Riley stated that he has prepared two different propoaal� which he believes meet the spirit af what Council hae� been diacusesing; ten acre� has baen added ta the propoeed epnrtment complex aite and the everag denaity o£ the 80 acre aite wau].d be 7 units per acre P�� No. Z�az Octaber 15, 1985 - the overa2l density of the site and the ad�acent property he owns wauld be 6 units per acre. Mr. Young, from Young and Wilk Architects, infarmed the Cauncil that he wa$ retained by Mr. Riley two � weeks ago to try to develop a praposal which meets City requi�ements. He stated that he ha$ looked et densities, building forms, topography, etc., that Mr. R11ey i� anxioua to get the pro�ect in a form acceptable to the City, and thet he has reviewed �our options with Mr. Dahlgren. He explained that he haa prepared two pasaible achemea which atep down the deneity �rom west to east on the site, addresging aoi conditions and terrein. He steted that one cancept ia for canatruction o£ faur lerger-acale structures, ?O unita per atructure, on the westeriy portion of th� site end screened £rom the neighborhood, stepped dawn to 40 unit-buildings and then 20 unit buildinga on th� ea$t portion of the aite. The other cancept wou2d be ?0 unit �tructures stepped down to 24 and 10 unit atructures. Mr. Young stated that the critical point far the developer is that while he does not expect resolutian af the iasue tonight, he i� trying to wark toward an end that is acceptable to the City. He indicated tha he is anly reviewing concepts this evening and cannot get into specifica because detailed plans have nat ye� been pr.epered. - Cauncilmember Blesener stated that part of the language �ust discus�ed by Council was a strong preference for awnerahip veraus rental, yet the deveioper'a financing plen dictates rental for ten years. Nating thet the d�veloper has not reduced the number af hausing units praposed far the aite, Councilm�mber Cummina steted that Cauncil is s�ying that he ahould dawnecale the pro3ect - CounciZ is talking ebaut 200 units of H�. Mr. Young rssponded that he is moving in the directio� { o£ complying with what Cauncil ie requiring but that - the awner must decide whether it ia economically feaeible to develop smaller acale buildinga. Mr. Rilsy steted thet he is canfident Council can �ee thai he ia trying to meet the Council"� deeire$. He pointed out that he is �ust eaking for approva2 of t` preliminery �inancing resolutiona tonight sa that h. can rneet £inancing requirement deadlines. He suggested that he can work dawn in bath size and styl� of buildings nnd further suggested that the only way the land wi21 ever be develaped will be in rental units. .� � :� :; Page No. 2383 October 15, 1985 Councilmember Blesener stated that another item diacusaed by Council wes achieving an average denaity of 6 unita per acre, which would require 100 acres. Mr. Riley responded thet he owna 120 acrea and the rest of the land will be developed on the basis of 4 units per acre ao that he will actually be achieving pro�ect under the 6 unit per acre average basis. Msyor Lockwood asked for questions $nd comments from the audience. Mr. James Losleben stated that the Council has never had to subsidize development within the City and eske who the Council is going to accommodate. He asked what the propoaed denaity will do to traffic on Mendota Heighta Road and stated that the people in Mendota Heighta are not intereated in high density. He urged Council not to subaidize a pro�ect the residents do not want. Mr. Bernard Friel stated that the tsxpayers are providing a subaidy for developmenta auch aa that propoaed. He atated that Mr. Riley indicatea that he needa S40 million in financing in order to build unit of a high quality nature and asked whether the developer ia auggesting that he would build something leas than quality unlesa he gets the subsidy. He urged Council not to approve the bond requeat. Mr. Russell Wahl, 631 Callahan Place, stated that he cannot understand why the Council rezoned the propert and that the City is putting gold in the developer's pocket. Mr. Riley responded that the pro�ect would have an immediate income to the City of one-half million dollars in permit and bonding £ees. Mrs. Mike Kennedy, 2567 Delaware Avenue, submitted a petition in oppoaition to the proposed pro�ect. � Mr. Dale Glewwe, 735 Blue Gentian, stated that the City invited the freeway and the traffic on Dodd: whe� the freeway was built, the City opened itaelf up to problema. He pointed out that the property ia also effected by airport noise. He stated that theae are conaideretions that the people north of T.H. 110 know nothing about. He suggested that before the federal government atepa in and tella the City that nothing can be built on the land, the City muat recognize thai what ia being propoaed mey be much better than what will be forced on the City in the future. Ayes: 5 Nays: 4 Pmge No. 2384 October 25, 1985 Mr. Losleben stated that airport noise and tra��ic ar� onZy excuses, thet Mr. Dahlgren says that the City wenta to accammodate diveraity in hauaing. He suggeated that senior citizens wi31 not locate in th� type af building propoaed, that the iasue of s�nior citlzen housing is not being addreased, and esk�d who would be eccammodated by the housing proposed. Mr. Friel sugges�ed that aircraft and freew�y noise are rationalizationa to reech a result end that if th FAA is going to start restricting development, it wii start in Bloamington and not Mendote Heights. He �el that it m�ke� no sense to insist that the property be u�ed for multiple development and steted that he be3ieves that the graperty wou3d be e desireable singl� faMily area b�cauae airpart naise will be reduced aver the nex� five years. Mr. Ben Thompson, a resident of Delaware Crossing, stated that he recent2y moved to Mendota Heights becau�e there wasn't high d�naity or congeation and traf£ic w�sn't bad. He stated that he is not in j o£ high denaity sauth of his property. Mr. Tim Urkula, from Wes�woad Planning, stated that h would like to remind the group that the land ia uniqu� in many ways, and suggeste� that it is s damaged site becauae af th� airport noiae, gaa pipeline, overhead electrical end fre�way impact. The�e being no further comments, Councilmember Cummin� moved tha� the hearing be closed. Counc3lme�ber Bleaener seconded the motion. Councilme�ber Blesener stated that the earlier discussion on the Comprehensive Plan was that the Council is laok�ng far diversity of housing types in the area with a 150 unit maximum in a given develap�e�t and wfth a preference for ownership versu: rental. �he stated that ahe cannot suppart more than 150 unita of rentel houaing. Councilmember Cummins sta�ed that he has continued reservetions and that he feels thet action an the Comprehen�ive Plan was appropriate. He $tated that nathing th� �eveloger atated tanight had �iven him confidence that the developer will come into compliance with the Camprehenaive Plan changea and that he can not therefore aupport the public finencing. :;, �; ;x.� Fage No. 2385 October 15, 1985 Councilmember Cummins moved denial of the mortgage revenue financing for the pro�ect. The motion died for lack of aecond. C Councilmember Blesener moved to give preliminary approval to S10 million in financing for a maximum of 150 units contingent upon adoption of an acceptable development proposal and on the basis that the City , assumes no obligation or liability for costa the developer or hia bond agenta may incur in proceeding to develop the bond iasue. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. C Mr. Riley stated that he could not accept approval of only S10 million in housing bond financing and left the meeting. Mayor Lockwood withdrew his second to the motion. Councilmember Blesener withdrew the motion. TANDEM CORPORATION Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Ordinance No. 217, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 401," to rezone Tandem Development's Phase I to R-1 and approval of the Tendem Development preliminary plat on the condition that one lot in Lots 7 through 14, Block 4 be eliminated and the area spread among the lots on that side of the street and with the proviso that be£ore approval of the final plat Council will � given the reatrictive covenanta for review. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 IJays : Q It was the Council concenaus that building permits fo model homea in Phase I could be issued prior to final plat approval, aince plat approval cannot accur until after completion and review of the comprehensive park study. MENDOTA HEIGHTS City Attorney Tom Hart stated that Mr. Riley's counse ASSOCIATES has apoken with him and asked that he inform the Council that Mr. Riley has not withdr�wn his applicationa but cannot live with the motion that was on the floor. PROCLAMATION Councilmember Hartmann moved that the Council proclai October 21st through the 25th as National Busineas an Professional Women's Week in Mendota Heights. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: S Nays: O Page No. 2386 October 15, 1985 MENDOTA HEIGHTS Mr. Tim Urkula asked £or clarification of the Counci3 ASSOCIATES action on the Comprehensive Plan amendments along wit . direction and guidance on how to proceed with development of the site. � ADJOURN Councilmembefi Hartmann moved that the meeting be ad�ourned to cloaed sesaion for diacusaion of park land acquiaition negotiationB. Councilmember Witt aeconded the motion. Ayea: 5 Nays: O TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 12:43 o'clock A.M. ----------------------------------- Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk ATTEST: .�?:. -------------------------------------- Robert G. Lockwood • Mayor EIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 15, 1985 Excavaiing License: J. R. Walker and Sons, Inc. Gas Pipinq �icense: DJ's Heating and Air Conditioning Generai Contractar's License: �'.' K. W. Dahm Construction Company, Inc. London Constructian Company Facific Pao3 and Patia M.B, Enterprises Quality Design, Inc. Lindstram Cleaning and Construction, Inc. Heating and Air Canditioninq �icense• DJ's Heating and Air Conditioning 10�15185 CL'AIMS LZST ` jf 20-Police ' CN�CK RE�IS��t� 3J-Fire 4Q-CEO '��J�.T V=�lQf1� IT�.M DESCRIpTZJtv 72.Z4 AUTOC�V I"J� RPRS 7?_.24 +/ ��.�s pi�.�s cur� sr�na SI6HT In;sE� 1Q.�5 *r 5.�� CITIZ:'VS L�A+�U� R�P�RT C{PY S.:'� «� i3.i.: ? �?SV I?�iFJ SVCS 3':;._ : *,� 4f�.1.�� AKOT� C��'�1TY UOTt:r'N 4(�}},_7 •r • �'t��A.?5 �! cara��-u ��►�� zr3c 2.:.�6`�.25 *�' 1�3.�!� !�AKOTA 4TY CFt C�}MM � � . - � ,�� ?`'.'.r �E:ONA�� ='`��RES�Pr 37. � ^ */ � b �.1 9 D C'-t � Y' C� "� 6� .14 */ 356,'^ CHRIS KL�?'N�CK 35h. � � */ 79.Z4 Q�'7RON C0�' 3R.h5 C�YfR�JN CO=P 33?.65 L►Y1R�3N Cfl�� 1S6.54 *i' 10�.3? �C��3.37 +,� 25.�1� 25.!�0 �/ GOQ .:; a 4�;�,?� */ 25.n0 " 25.�Q *,/ 3��r 3�� '' * .'� . 5.5C s.5a = r� 22.98 �v�r��. ��v�� MI �t"V�50TA 30�?KSTORc MpRTih1 MC ALt. ZSTER CI TY u ST �AU� CD NN C�•T_�F P�IICE �SSi'J M�D�#ST aH��ES��E NORTHEPoN 4UTOMOTIV: C�!3� ^�EED� STUOY �I��?GHTLR 1 �YMT "! 34�E `�112"�T6 L'TTc� Cr C C-r� . LA804lPARTS C�Pi�� Nt1�tiS�.P? GAWtV ��r�� DI�TRON �YTR�hj DYTRON EX3' F4 LL MTG MN I AID SUPP Tfl 84 STATt;TES CLIN=C �.�ALUATIGtU A'JNU4L DU�S 14�5 DtlES F� QT �P� PAR TS 70-Parks ~ V 80-Planning 90-Animal Contral ACCOUNT 'Vt�. I�1V, 15-4330-440-�6� i r.,?-441C-(120-�2'7 4 0�-44r2-110-�1^ . ^1-4226-�r��J.� 4�1-44�:��-�J3'J- 3+� 98-44�J-f326-i.�� t;�1-�44�0- 1'1 0- 1+.: �1-43�5��40-4,�, +�1-4330w490-3G 1 �1-4335-�31 5- ?C i'i-43�?5-!�SCi- 5� 6 '?1-43�S�U70-7t� 6 15-43'�5-Q60-�b�`� 6 �� -�4�a-�ozo• zo +�1-44;�2-�20- 20 n� -��ob�za- za r�7-b4�4-liGi�-'•� i ;;1 -4 4� 4w �2a-�?_�3 f'1-4330-440- 7C' b' t71-433044b0-30 3' "I OU *JT � 22.98 * ' 2.�8 �.c►g *i 25J.�0 2, 9$1 .4 5 3,231.45 *i 2,107..�3 Z,1�7�.,3 {� 25.4G 25.�0 */ 11.�5 11.35 11.35 11.35 11.42 5 6 . `� 2 *� 2r797.9� 2 , 797. 90 */ 733.50 733. SO +/ 247.50 2 47. 5 0 *� 1 8.'JO 1R.00 s/ 9. 3 S 9.3 S */ 10. 82- 4�.36 29.54 �/ SZQ.18 52�1.1 8 */ 24.L1 24 ,? 1 k' CHECK P.EG�STER VENDOa ITEM D�SCRIPTION �Po�x ACE BLACKTOP INC ACE 3LACKT�� :NC STAT= TRP,1S TA8 903KS INC CUnTIS IN�IUSTRiES CURTI� II�I�USTRIES CURTI S I�d]USTRi �S CURTIS IN�USTr�IES CURTIS IN�JUSTRI ES KUSTO,M =L�CTR�NICS SCHERFF INC QETE�S�N SEED CO FIRE CHI�F MAGAZIN� NATL FIRE PROT�CTIDN ALSINSON ALBINSON ANDE�SEN =4RL F&ASSO AT 8� T I �� SYST�MS PHOT�S PATCIi ODJ HUhTcR ASPHALT DRIVEIiAY 3RD QTR �/CHC� ' 9 0'J K S MiSC SPLYS N?SC SPLYS MiSr SFLY� !"ISC SPLYS ?�ISC SFLYS MGVI?V� �CACp� TBP APRS SUMMITB.MAR3E GRA SS S� ED ON= 1fR S I;BSC POSTERS RTNS TAP�. MISC SIGNS/P�STS �CI S VC 12.�t2 B&J 4UTil SPLY MISC PARTS 4CCOUNT N0. :N=11.�� 1-G3Q5--030-30 �� 84� 4� VJ�" OO 7� O U 97-446fJ-825-OG j1-4447«110�10 nl �-4 4� 2- 11 0- 1�' �1-43�5-�2Q-2� � �1�43��5.,�30-�3�� `3x r��-.43�J5-OSD-50 :�� ^1-4305-070-7f, :�. 15--43:'S�060�6� :3� 'i2-4620-000-QO `9's i1-4337-OSO-S� 87-446Q-812-CO �1i 01-44�J2-030-3� � �1-4305-030-3G xb� OS-4300-10 5- 1 5 � QS-43�70-905-15 � 01-4'420-�C50-SJ �i ;1-4210��J5'J-SC 2i 01-4305-050- S� 0' . AMOUNT 12.82 33.87 SQ.51 #� 169.95 1 69.95 *� 1 u5 .,'? Z r134.36 Zr239.36 * / 3.3$ 13.5J 25.�5 4? "5 14.66 4 .: 2 29. 7b 3.69 4 . ,� 2 4.J2 �49.�6 */ 74,� 5 11 8. h5 59.3 2 2 52.1 2 */ 27.83 32.5A 35.9 iJ 58.ZD 34.35 40.58 32.65 Z 5 5 . � 1 +r/ 74.5ii 6.1 8 85.78 */ CHECK REGIST�R V�N00? E3&J AUTtJ SPLY HB�J 4UTl� SPLY 8� �i4TER COMMISSION � CAS� �0��F�UT_P CA�E �Ov1E3$,EqUiP CITY MOTG� SUP?Lr CITY MOTJ? SUPPLY CITY t��JTCp SIiPPLY CITr MOTr:c SUF►'LY CITY "�OTQ� SUPPLY CITY M�TO� SUPPLY CITY MOTC? SUPPLY CiTY MOTOR SUFPLY C?TY �!OTO? SUFPLY CITY MOTO� SUPPLY CONT=L CR=JIT CORP C�NTEL C�'=7IT CORP CONT=L CR=DIT CORP DAVIS tL=�TRONIC SYC DAYIS �LECTRONIC SVC DAVIS �LE�TRONiC SVC DAVIS ELECi'RC�NIC SVC DAVIS EL��TRONiC SVC DAVIS �LEC7RONIC SVC DA VIS �LFCTRONI C SVC �LVIN �AF=TY SUi'PlY �IVI�! SAF=TY SUPPLY LTEM DESCRIPTiON MISC PARTS MISC PAR TS AUG SVC aQR�/�,A3 C� �,��6�3�� RF�S/LABCR CASEb�� ac Pi�'V;J�tS NIS � P A� T; �r S B�A N MiSC Yd� TS NISC PAR T� FILT�R NISC PART� MIS C PAR TS OC7 PYMT 47 OCT PYMT 47 OCT PYMT47 PARTS /r�p q PARTS /RP R PARTS/RPR P�,R TS /RP R PARTS/R�R PAR TS /RP R PARTS/RPf? MISC �'AR l� SLZJ� 9•�� I C M A PUBL 3558� c,CCOurvT rdo. Iwv. 01-4305-070-70 15-4305-060-6Q G1-4425-030�3Q i5-433�-49Q�hv 15-4330�490-6C t�1-4330a440� ZL 1 �� —4330— 440- 20 i C1-4330--440�2� 1 ',1a43?0-44C-2C 'I J1 -4? �ir.. 490- S�, 1 G1-4330-490-Su 1 �1-4330-490�5�r 1 D1-4330-490-70 '! Q1-4330-490-7� 1 1 5- 4 3 30- 490- 60 1 01-4210�-020-20 2+ ^1-42'10-110-10 0� �15-4210-105-15 0� C�1-4330-450-30 2; 01-4330�450-3Q 2i 01-4330-450-3(3 2; C�1-4 3 30- 450- 30 2i 01-4330-450-30 2� Q1-4330-450-34 2i �1�4330-450-3fl 2� �1-4330-4b0-3�J 8� �1-4330-460-30 85 �1-44t�2-11C-10 "�J NT 9.�� ./ 132 .31 6h.19 � 9 �i . 5'J */ 109.35 109.35 109.35 109,35 1�9.41 5 46. � 1 +/ b.7b 53.9 2 6'� .6 8 #/ 27.35 12.�1 39.46 +/ 55.�6 55.26 */ 1 . ?0 8.47- 1J,40 7.93 64. 6 6 33.85 .85- 8.5+4 22.31 140.^7 *� 9.��0 9.�D 9.��4 27.�?0 */ CHECK REGIST�R V= NDO? ICM4 RC ICMA �G K4R 'RODU�TS I�C. KAR PRODU�TS I'+lC. KAR ��iODU�TS INC. KpA PRODU�TS ZPIC. K�R ��Oi7�J�TJ iNC. K�!UTH TOM KNUTH TOM KULL4"JDEP. GUY KUL�AN�ER GUr LAKELAi�D =OR� IANGUTA H�41E LA�'GUI.A� kJNE LaNGULa HD41E �ANGULA HD�IE LANGULA HDUE �ANGUL� HDNE IANGULl� wDNE LANGULA HDWE LANGULA iiD�iE L�EF BROS I NC LEEF 3P.OS I NC ��F BR.OS INC IT�M DESCPIPTION 1f/11 pAVRCLI 1�111 PHYRCLL N:SC PARTS h1i�C PAR TS `aISC QAP. TS NISC �AF?TS `�ISC PA:RT� `� i T�iRU 1 u/ci MI THRU 1C/$ ""I THP,U 1�/�3 Mi TH�U 7J1is QaRTaS KEIf S SrPT i+ISC LIGHT BULB BULB MISC SPLYS FU�L TANK SEPT DISC NOZ ZL E PARTS SEPT SVC SEP T SVC SEPT SVC 15..i5 M�ND HGTS R�BE3ISH SEPT SYC 15.35 M�N�J NGTS RUBBISH SEPT SUC Z8.?S M�ND HGTS RU88ISN SEPT SVC ACCOUNT U0. INY.� �1-2G72-00�-JL )1-4134-1i0-1� �'1-43f,•S�G20-2�J 59.! G1-43C�5-J30-3J 5�.� '71-43n5-050-SC 54� �1-43�5-�J70-7:� �9 15-4 3��5 � �6�J- 60 59� ^ 5� 4 415- 105-1 5 98--441 S�-8Z6-�]0 C'Sa4415w1C5-15 95-4415-322-L+� 0�-4330••460-3 �3 �J1-43^5-Q30-30 21 t?1-4305-030-3� 01-43^5-030-3C 2i D1-4305�03�-30 21 01�4305-030-30 21 01-4305-030-30 17 07-43�5-OSO-SO 01-4305-tJ50-St� 2i G1-4330-490-50 17 01 -4 3fl 5- 050- 50 54 �1-43�5-070-70 54 1 5-4 3'J 5�- 060- 60 54 �J1«4280-31��-� 7 01-4280-31 G-7t, .i7 C1-42EQ-315-30 23 'OUNT 15.3�0 74.75 * � 62.40 �2.40 */ 16.96 1 6.96 1h,9b 5 ^ . � � �.- 7:. .5 S 23.90 94,45 */ 1^.Q8 � / �:.9$ * 2 8.1 5 28.15 �.� 71 .24 77 . 2 4 */ 1 SO . f) fl 1 S�.QD */ 23.25 23 .2 5 */ 107.86 107.R5 9,1 6 42..40 112.b5 59.5 8 59.58 47..� 2 17.86 2!J 3. 20 3.68 CH�CK R�'GI�T�P, UENDO� ITEM OE5CRIPTION M�hD HGTS RU88ISN SEPT SVC MIDb��ST SI RcN SERV MI04�=�T atR�-STE�I MID4I�ST W_'R�-�TEEL M1 O�_ ST Wi RE-$T�tL MiIL=° pR+_�VTING M ILL=R �RI ;JTI RG wiNN 9�N�FIT �SSN MINN JEPi OF R= V NINN MINI"�G&MFG l��T M TCN GLOV� S GL� V= 5 t;��V�S �US I"JcSS CAR OS �4VG� CC FORHS BaL �C7 PR�M S�PT FUE L TAX �LARM SUC CULLI64N MINN T"c:AMSTE+�-LOC320 OCT OU�S NELSON RADIO COMH NDRT'�ERN �T PO�iER CO NQRTHER;N ST POUER CO NORTNERN ST POWER Cfl NORTNERN ST P01iER CO N�RTi_RN �T �04itR CO N�RTNERN ST PGUE� CO �;ORTH�RN ST POWER CO ��P.THERN ST PQNE? CO NORT-1_RN ST PO4JER CO N�RTN�R�V ST P041=R CO 110RTHtRN ST POWER CO OCT MTCN OCT S VC OCT S U C QCT S VC OCTSVC oc r s vc �CT S UC OCT S VC CCT SL� �CT SVC OCT SVC OCT SVC ACCOUNT N�. I NV. A 15-4280-310-60 37 07-433�J..000-Ou 129 n1-43�5�-�SG-50 8t35 n1-43"?5-070�7C d85 ?5-43';5--�76t,�6i� E8: !�1-43J5-G2C-Z�J 521 ��-43�5��4Ge40 531 01-4131�-�7�-7�; GRP t'1-432t7-GSO-SC 67� 15-433C�400-60 505 ^1-2!�75-000-��7 01-4330-450-20 136 Q1-4271�3'10-5D 01-4Z11-3i0-7Q 01-4211�315-30 (?1-4211-�32�-7+� Q1-4211-420-5G >>1-4212-31fl-S� ;?�-4212�-310-�7� ��1-�4212--320-7�� 1�-4211-310-6Q 15-4211-400-60 15-4211-400-60 '�'OUNT 59.5 8 925.42 *, 7 , 365 .� 9 " 7, 365.�:9 #� 12.�� 1 7_.6Q * / 839 ..: 7 585.58 77^.�6 1:572�4� . 232.j7 - !. �17'l,�g *i 14.58 23.97 15.66 23.1 3 3.56 2Q.93 21.64 89. S 3 7..62 215.92 *� 25.75 25.75 �/ 4!) . 5 7 366.[�3 406.6D *% 21.96 S�. �0 71 .96 • %` CHECK PE6IST�R VE NO�J� ITE "1 OES CRI P TI aN NORTHERN ST POW�R CO OCT SVC ORFEI & SONS INC CXYG�^1 SEaVIC�: CU PI�It B=VD �AVI'NG INC PINE SEND pAVZNG INC pINE B�NO PAVItvG IntC PIhE BEND �'AUING INC PI�VE R�VO PAVI►`JG I��C S&T OFFIC: PR00 Sg7 OFFiC� PROD S&T DFFIC� PROD S&T �FFIC� PR00 S&T �FFIC= ?R00 SB,T �FFIC� PROD S&T OFFICc PR00 S&T OFFI C� PR OD S&T JFFICE PROD SEVEN CORN� R ACE HQ�i SHIELY J L CO SHIELr J L CO SIGNAL �A� NASH SIGN4L CAA WASH FIN AL 83• 4 D�`1URPAG� TNR�J 9/15 FiN��`�'_i( t�IcAR/FINE MiX FiN= MIX FINE MIX b1EAR MIX MISC S�L1fS MISC SPLYS SCRATCH PCCS MISC SPLYS NIL I7ERS "1ISC SPL�I� CAL REFI LLS MISC SPLYS PFNCILS NUTS/80LTS CL S KEY CL 4 SEP T WAS+�ES 4TH QTR 12,36 � SNYD"cR ORJG STORES PHOTO FINISHING ACCOUNT NO• INW. K 15-421 2»310-6�` 87-4460�i312-�� ,7-43�5-��3�J-3^ 23� �1-44Z2•-GSQ-S� 42 �1�`��LL»JS��'Sr 3/ !;1-4422••�50-5�� 4J !;1-44Z2-�50-50 39 15-44�2-�6C-6(' 42 (3i-43C10-020-20 A8 n1-43�0-020-2C� P8 01-43�0-t�20-� �8 �1-4300-020-'c_ �8 01-43J0-110-1t7 P8 Q'i-43�0-110-1� QS 01-43�0�11D-1D P8 C'1-4 3Q0-i 10-10 P8' L�5-4300�-1Q5-15 �8 C1-4420�050-SO 2� 01-4422-D50-SO 1G 87-4460-812-JQ 10 01-4430-020-2C 2i t)1-4430-020-�Ci 21 �1-43�5-020-�0 72 : MOU NT 12.36 :/ Z4(.�.� 0 24ti.^0 *, 1,978.33 1 .34� . � 5 �37.29 18.15 46.35 167.?7 91.ci6 1 4'! . 9 7 Z2t�.23 23.�3 ��524.73 */ 32.85 3 2 . �i 5 *% �3.67 9.^$ 4b. 5 0 32.28 96.53 +r/ 7R.['8 71.90 62.95 204.93 *� CHECK RE�IST�'R VLNDOR SOUTHUIEW GARO=[N CTR ST AT= TP,Ea S P E� ST� TE TRE',S P�R STAT= TRc; S P�t� STAT_ TREaS P�R STATc TRt� S P�r� ST6Tc TR�.-3S PER STAT= TRt� S P�P. STAT= TR�I� ?EK STAT� TRF�S PE° STGTE TRr=1S PEP, STAT_ TR�� 5 STATL TR��S ST PTE TR�4 S �T PAUI BOOK&ST[4T SUv NEVSF�PERS SUN NENSFAPERS SUN NtwSP4PERS SUN 11EiiSP4PERS UNIFORAI�S UNLIHI��ED UNIFORKS UNLIMI�fED UN IFdRM S UNL I MI l�ED ITEM DE� CRIP TI ON BUSHES 9/27 �AYRCLL 9/27 �AY�CLL 9/27 PAYRttt 9/27 �AYROLL 9/2 7 FAY ft CLL 9/2 7� AY R CLL 9I27 °AYRCLL 9/27 QAYRCLL 9/Z7 ?QY�CLL 9/27 PAYRCLL 0CT PF, EM QCT �REN OCT PREM MISC SFI.YS NRG NOT CQMF LU HRGNOT YGRKTOwN AO FD " �""" � NRG NOT 83-738 SR�DGER KLEIBER BLA CK FEl L �ER 66.28 Ur�IT_D CE+� T TRU�T�E OCT PREM 34.14 UNIT�� CE.VT TRU}' TEt OCT PREM 35.'6 U�IIT=O C�V T TRU�iTEE OCT PR.EM 22.7� UNIT=J CENT 7RU�T�.� �CT FP,E h 16?.78 * % ACt�U�1T N0. IiVU. 1�-4490-000-00 95 ��1-2Jb��Jfl—u� C1-4134—�7p�7.� ti�-41 ?4wu21-20 j�1�4'134--�30-3ri �1�41?4—�40•y4� �1 W41 34�-J50-5� �1-41 ?4M�770-7U l71-41 34�11 0- 1 � '�5-4134�105-15 15-4134—C60�60 °J1-2�74W�00—Q� 62 �1-4131�021-2G 62 ��1-47 31�110•1� 62 C1-43C0-030-?L 33 D1-424d-O8�-87 66 01-4240-�J80-80 66 G1-4490-030-3Q 27 9fl-424Q-816-�JO 66 01-4410-020-2fl 18 01-441D-020-2Q 19 �1-4410-t�20-2� 19 01-2071-000-�G 16 f;1-4132-�2a-20 16 �1�-41 ?2-050-5t3 1 6 �1�4132-�70-7C? 16 •MOU,yT 1 31 .? B 1'31 . 2'3 • , 43b.70 70� . 60 1,137.;p */ 17�q45."1 345.�2 87.4� Z43.�'G ?,797.��t 3•957.39 25�.'?iJ T�97�i.52 3Z.23 12.11 � •981.45 2 : , 322.1 7 56, R5i7.1 S 10877 10878 10879 10880 10881 10882 10883 10884 10885 10886 GT CH�CK REGIS7ER VENDf�R WrST�RV LIF� INS CO ZI EGLE R TI RE SVC CO ZIE6LER TI�E SVC CC ITEM DESCRIPT:ON OCT PRE M TiRES 31�1 /3�`9 TIRcS 4�2/4'�J3 ACCOUNT N0. INII. Q1-4132-J30- 3� �1-433��49��-5fl Ei 15-4 3 30-� 490- 6�J 87 FU`!� '�1 TOT4l G=NER�L Ft,�YO FUf+I� �5 TOT4L f �GR �NT�RPRI�E FUV�J �7 TOTAL CIYiL DEFFNSE t=UNt7 1'� TDT;3,L c?� Ci�+� F4RK FU(�iD �UyD 1? TOTAL �CU:PME%�iT CF�TIFiCAT�S �UN� 15 70T,�1 S�N�R UTILITY FUN� 84 TOTAL I33-1TUiNNI:NT�RLAN_ADO'1 �UVD 87 TOTAL I:�3-4/83-4E GRYC/DAK CTY FUVO 9� TaTAL ?r?3-?f3 MN FC M1� Ot��T FUND 95 TOTAL ;?4w4r0ULC YC� KT7'1 FUN� 97 T�TAL r35�� A^1�J�R/CURL�Y FUVD 98 TOTAL T�4-6MH r�C L�K 55 MSA T�TAL MANUAL CHECK 646.48 MBA October premium 40.00 D. Van Hove Refund pymt made to City in error 263.44 U. S. Post Ofc 3rd Quarter Utility postage 10.00 Fred G. Anderson Paint Paint cans 2,605.64 St. Treas SS Fd 9/27 FICA 4,702.92 Director Tnt Revenue 9/27 FIT 60.00 DC Bank 9/3 & S/20 Payroll Deductions 200.00 " 9/2fi Payroll Deductions 1,501.26 SCCU " 22,280.07 City M.H. Payroll Acct 9/27 Net payroll 32,309.81 8�,159.96 t . NORTH • STAR •SERVICES P.O. BOX 4099 ST. PAUL, M�NN. 55104 North Star Services has contracted with Andrew & Laura 0'Brien to build a one-story addition as indicated on the sight plan. The addition will be used as an extension of the existing foyer and an entry which is more easily accessible from the driveway. The addition itself will have a flat roof with a wood deck and 42" tall iron railing. It will replace a small existing deck area. The new structure will not extend beyond the structure nor will it be visible from any location except the driveway area. We will not excavate any soil. The addition will be built on existing masonry and concrete footings. %�f'^ �� .,�.� .1--�_ Mathew H. Piepkorn 688 HAGUE AVENUE I ST. PAUL 55104 ! 227•7061 NORTH • STAR • SERVIC�S 4911 FRANCE AVE. SO. I EDINA 55410 / 927•4432 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS I'ul�'uC�7 T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Fraze ,a% J City Adminis ator October 15, 1985 SUBJECT: Add-on Agenda for October 15th Meeting Two items are requested for addition to this evening's agenda, and there is an additional suggestion in adopting the agenda. Item No. 3- Agenda Adoption It is recommended that the agenda be adopted as printed with the additions of items 8h, and 10a. In my memo suggesting that we postpone the Riley bond and Tandem rezoning hearings until after the Mayor's arrival, I had also intended to suggest that we postpone consideration of item 8d, the South East Area Comprehensive Plan Amendments. I am sure that Bob would want to be part of these discussions, and would appreciate not beginning those deliberations until after his arrival. Item 8h - Public Hearing Notices Attached are notices I have recently received from the Regional Transit Board, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, and the Dakota County Library Board concerning upcoming public hearings on provision of their respective services to our area. I placed these on the agenda to bring them to your attention. If Council has any comments that they would like passed on to the respective agencies, I would be happy to co�nunicate those either in writing, or by personal appearance at the meetings. ACTION REQUIRED To indicate whether Council wishes to have any comments passed on to the RTB, the MLdCC, or Dakota County Library. Item l0a - Closed Session to Discuss Wachtler Park Property Offer City Attorney Hart has done some further research on the proposed purchase offer to the Wachtler's for their property, and would like the opportunitv to meet in closed session with Council to discuss that offer. KDF:madlr attachments � . , ;, • � �-,�7 �;"i '_" , : i,` ..3'� s. i' .`,;� � c � +: � , .r` . ' � .�� ,.. . � �� y � � �r . " .�.-p';.. .� . � �:irr,•:•�`�";�ICf.VM`V11�1`F711D�.�'71VJ 270 Metro Square Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612/292-8789 (�,:Y l' �y '�y �� I J!'� � i},� �,. The,Regional Transit Board (RTB), as created by the Minnesota Legislature in 1984, is responsible for planning, policymaking and administration of transit in the seven county Twin Cities metropolitan areas. To dicuss the various programs of the RTB and to obtain input on transit issues in your community, the RTB will be holding a number of ineetings in your area over the next few weeks. These meetings will be held in each of the.eight Regional Transit Board districts and will be attended by the Regional Transit Board member for that district. Enclosed is an RTB district map and a list of board members. � Two meetings will be held to discuss the RTB activities and other transit- related issues within your community. The dates, time and focus of these meetings are as follows: Wednesday, October 23, 1985 Public Forum on the Transit Service Needs 7:00 p.m. � Assessment Mendota Heights City Hall Discussion of the RTB's Transit Service Needs 750 S. Plaza Drive Assessment, and input on transit issues from the Mendota Heights general public. Wednesday, November 6, 1985 7:00 p.m. Eagan Public 1340 Wescott Eagan RTB Chairman's Meeting Library Discussion of the RTB, MTC, and current transit Road issues for elected officials, legislative representatives and city administrators. The RTB's Transit Service Needs Assessment, which is the focus of the first two meetings, represents one of the major efforts of the RTB over the next year. The purpose of the Transit Service Needs Assessment is to conduct an overall evaluation of transit services and needs in the metropolitan area. The focus of the Transit Service Needs Assessment is on short- to mid-range planning and transit improvements. As a first step in the study process we would like to gain a better�understanding of issues and concerns relating to transit in your area. The Chairman's meeting will focus on a broader range of transit issues and is intended for local elected officials, legislators and city administrators. Separate correspondence on this particular meeting will be forthcoming from the RTB Chairman, Elliot Perovich. As a community staff person, you are invited to attend the Public Forum on the Transit Service Needs Assessment on Wednesday, October 23, at 7:00 p.m. at the Mendota Heights City Hall. An Equal Opportunity Employer • ,. • ^ ___ _ City of Mendota Heights Dalcota County, Minn�sota RESOLUTION N0. 85- RESOLUTION APPROVING TANDEM CORPORATION'S PLANNED UIVIT DEVELOPf�NT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT WHEREAS, Tandem Corporation has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a Planned Unit Development consisting of single family lots on 100 acres of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4) of Section 36, Township 28, Range 23; and WHEREAS, such Planned Unit Development will consist of approximately 180 single family lots; and WHEREAS, Phase I will be constructed on 37 acres of land and Phase II and III will be constructed on 100 acres of land. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the Conditional Use Permit for Tandem Corporation's Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat be approved. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 15th day of October, 1985. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood, hlayor � ,` . City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. 85 RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMII�G ASSESSMENTS FOR WATERMAIN TRUNK LINE ALONG TRUNK HIGHWAY 149 AND MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD (IMPROVEMENT N0. 83, PROJECT N0. 7B) ' BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights as follows: WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, has calculated the proper amount to be specially assessed for the costs incurred to date with respect to Improvement No. 83, Project No.7B construction of watermain trunk line to serve the following described property situated in the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: All land adjacent to Trunk Highway 149 (Dodd Road) from Lake Drive South to Mendota Heights Road and Mendota Heights Road East of Trunk Highway 149. WHEREAS, the proposed assessment roll has been on file with the Clerk and at all times since its filing has been open for public inspection; and notice thereof has been duly published and mailed as required by law. Said notice stated the date, time and place of such meeting; the general nature of the improvement; the area proposed to be assessed; that the proposed assessment roll has been on file with the Clerk; and that written or oral objections thereto by any property owner would be considered; and jdHEREAS, said hearing was held at 8:00 o'clock P.M. on September 17, 1985, at the Ci�y Hall in the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota; and IdHEREAS, the h1ayor announced that the hearing was open for the consideration of objections, if any, to said proposed assessments; and [,1HEREAS, all persons present were then given an opportunity to present oral objections, and all written objections theretofore filed with the Clerk were presented and considered. NOW THEREFORE, this Council, having heard and considered all objections so presented, and being fully advised in the premises, and having made all necessary adjustments and corrections, finds that each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumberated in the proposed assessment roll was and is specially benefited by the construction of said improvements in not less than the amount of the assessment, as corrected, set opposite the descrip- tion of each such lot, piece and parcel of land, respectively, and that such amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein described; and BE IT FURTHER RESQLVED, that the progosed assessment rall is hereby adop�ed and confirmed as Che proper special assessment for each af said lots, pieces and parcc�ls af land respectively, and th� assesemen� against each parcel, together with interest at the rate af ten percent (10%) per annum accruing on the full amount thereof from time to time unpaid, shall be a lien concur- ren� with general taxes upan such parcel and a11 thereof. The total amount of each such assessment as to watermains sha3:I be payable in equal amounts extending over a period of nineteen {19} years, the first of said-install- ments, together with interest on the entire assessment cammencing thirty (3Q) days from �he date hereof to December 31, 1986, to be gayable with general taxes for the year 1986, collectible in 1987 tnow designa�ed as real estate taxes payable in 19$7), and ane of each af the remaining install- ments, tagether wa.th one year's interest on thaC and a11 other unpaid in- stallments, to be payable with general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter untiZ Che entire assessment is paid; and BE IT FiJRTHER RESQLVED, that prior to Octaber 17, 1985, �he owner af any, lot, giece or garcel of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the who2e of such assessment, without interest to the City Treasurer; and BE IT FURTIiER RESqLVED, that the Clerk shall prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of said assessment ro11 with each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists af the Caunty, and �he County Auditor shall thereafter callec� said assessments in the manner provided by Zaw. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendata Heigh�s this 15th �}�y o� October 1985. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City C1erk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �Y ,.... Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor , � +r . 0 • .r � City of hlendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. 85- RESOLUTION DEF'ERRING PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS (IMPROVEMENT N0. 83, PROJECT N0. 7B) WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, has calculated the proper amount to be specially assessed for Improvement No. 83, Project No. 7B, construction of watermain improvements; and WHEREAS, the hearing on said assessments was duly held at 8:00 o'clock P.M. on September 17, 1985, at the City Hall of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the proposed assessment roll for said improvements was duly adopted by the City Council on September 17, 1985; and . WHEREAS, the City Council has determi.ned that it would be in the best interest of the City of Mendota Heights to defer the payment of the assessments with respect to the above referenced improvements in the following amounts and as to the following parcels situated in Dakota County, Minnesota, to-wit: Tax Parcel 27-03500-010-OS 27-03500-010-75 27-03500-010-78 27-03500-010-79 27-03500-030-82 27-03600-010-Sl 27-03600-010-52 ;� Owners Visitation Monastery 2455 Visitation Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Visitation Monastery 2455 Visitation Drive Mendota Heights , I`'II�I 55120 Visitation Monastery 2455 Visitation Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Ind. School Dist. #197 1897 Delaware Avenue Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Carl & Ladonna Ca.se 540 Dakota Co. Rd. 30 St. Paul, MN 55123 Ind. School Dist. ,�197 1897 Delaware Avenue Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Ind. School Dist. #197 1897 Delaware Avenue Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Def erred $ 4,014.00 3,690.00 12,816.00 12,942.00 630.00 23,940.00 7,218.00 � Tax Parcel 27-03600-010-53 27-03600-010-54 27-03600-030-54 27-03600-060-54 Owners James R. Riley 2320 Lexington Avenue So. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dale H. & Barbara Glewwe 720 Mendota Heights Rd. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Pierce Butler ET AL 738 Mendota Heights Rd. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Irving Clark 297 Laurel Avenue St. Paul, MN 55102. � Deferred • 4,104.00 1,800.00 11,448.00 6,012.00 WHEREAS, that each of the above assessments indicated above as being deferred would be deferred with the understanding that said amount, plus interest accrued from September 17, 1985 at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum, would become immediately payable upon the future development of the parcel to which said deferred assessment relates. NOW 'I'HEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, as f ollows: 1. That the assessment roll for Improvement No. 83, Project No. 7B, be corrected as set forth above. 2. That upon the future development of any of the above described parcels necessitating the issuance of a building permit from the City of Mendota Heights, the deferred amount of said assessment against to the property to be developed, as more particularly set forth above, will be immediat�ly due and payable, together with interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum from September 17, 1985. 3. That the City Attorney is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution in the office of the County Auditorsand County Recorder of Dakota County, Minnesota so that any future purchaser or party interest relative to any of the above described parcels will be on notice relative to the deferred assessments described above. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 15th day oL- October, 1985. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor ATTEST : Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk �': C 0 IV. FEE CALCULATION The schedule used to calculate fees is as follows: Principal Consultant $60.00/hr Consultant $45.00/hr PROJECT �� I NEEDS ANALYSIS II INFORMATION PLANNING III STRATEGY EVALUATION IV REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS VI IMPLEMENTATION TOTAL EFFORT ESTIMATED COST TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT CONSULTANT 30 hrs 8 hrs 16 14 16 8 .4.$ 1S2 124 hrs 32 hrs $7,440.00 $1,440.00 y�O��BQ.�� - We propose to complete the effort described �n thi.s proposal for total fee not to exceed . $8,880.00. Fees for each phase of the project shall be as follows: Phase I - $2,160.00 . Phase II _ $960.00 Phase III - $840.00 Phase IV - $1,320.00 Phase V _ 53.600.00 TOTAL $8,880.00 � , `w`' � .. . City of Mendota Heights Proposal Page 15 :.: � III. PROJECT FLAN The ti.me estimates given for the project are based ort ouz experience with similar projects in �he public sector and re�.ect the need to coordinate project plans with the meeting schedules of staff and the Ci�y Council. The availabili�y of staff andividuals must also be considered in definang schedules; the one we recommend is designed to mina.mize interference wi�h the norma.]. staff work load. We are flexible and willing to accammodate yaur schedule. � PHASE I - NEEUS ANALYSIS. . 1.1 Data Callection - S�.aff interviews and research. 1.2 Departmental analysis - analysis of existing systems operatic�n and user a�titudes. 1.3 Repart preparation and presentatian. �. ESTIMATED C4MPLETION TIM E- 4 WEEKS 1 �.�. PHASE II - INFORMATION PLANNING. �'"' 2.1 Goal development workshop. 2.2 In�ormation Architecture developnnent. 2,3 Develap Organization requirements. 2.4 Report preparation and presentation. � ESTIMATED COMPLETION TIME - 4 WEEKS PHASE III - STRATEGY EVALUATION. 3.1 Project Team Warkshap. 3.2 Evaluate processi.ng aptians. 3,3 Review Technolagy 5.ssues. 3,4 Select Stra�egic A1.tetnatives. 3.5 Cost/Benef%t Analysis. 3.6 Success Factor Analysis. 3.7 Report preparation and presentation. ESTIMATED COMPLETI(3N TIME - 3 WEEKS t l, i -.� - City of Mendota Heights ' Proposal Page 12 r �, � i PfiASE IV - REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS. 4.1 Prepare system objectives. 4.2 Prepare System Specification. � 4.3 Report preparation and presentation. ,-; . � ESTIMATED COMPLETION TIME - 3 WEEKS PHASE V - IMPLEMENTATION. 5.1 prepare Request For Proposal. 5.2 Proposal distribution. 5.3 Proposal evaluation. 5.4 Contract negotiation. 5.5 Training and Installation. 5.6 Policy and Procedure development. � 5.7 Post-audit review. ESTIMATED COMPLETION TIME - 20 WEEKS (Based on bidding requirements and normal vendor delivery schedules of 90 days) . ESTIMATID TOTAL COMPLETION TIME - 34 WEERS. \ . � `� � City of Mendota Heights Proposal Page 13 5, IMPLEMENTATION If the City determines it is feasible �o proceed and the recammended solution includes the purchase o� software, hardware or services, we propase to assist the Ci.ty throughout the pracess of implementing tha� decisian. We will begin by preparang a Request Far Progosal (RFP} . We will assist the Ca.ty i.n the distribution of that RFP by furnishing names of potential vendors and researching po�.enti.al hardware/software solutions. After proposals are received, we will assist the City in �he development o� an evaluation process. Ttt3.s evalua�ian will enable the City to de�ermine which Proposal most closely fulfills their requirements. The evalua�ion will a].so include any 2easeJpurchase calculations neeessary ta provide the City with an accurate means of determining which proposals most cost effective. `9�" •'� Once �he best proposal has been designated, the Con�ultant will assist in any "' necessary contract negotiations and in the preparation of a11 contract documents with respect to performance requirements, vendor support, system maintenance and o�her �.echnical requirements. . We wi.11 help the City during the actua]. ins�alla�ion of equipment and software, and�assist in the preparation of po].icies and procedures for managing and Coperating the System. ( A.�ter the installation pracess is complete we will perfarm a post- °�:..� implementation audit and reptart any recommended modifications which may he "``• req�ired to help maintain an e£fici�nt and effective System. `� l � City of Mendata fieights Proposal Page 2I POLICE REPORT PROJL�rIONS 1986 1987 1988 Opr. Exp. $645,000 709,000 744,000 Add'1 Exp. Clerical 4,000 6,000 New Officer 30,000 40,000 Cars 22,230 22,500 23,000 Radios 5,000 5,000 5,000 702,230 730,000 818,000 Cr. Pol. Aid 33,900 36,700 36,700 668,330 693,300 781,300 Population M Hts. 8,060 8,300 8,700 Mendota 230 235 246 Lilydale 430 490 520 Calls (2 yrs) M Hts. 5,685 5,800 5,950 Mendota 449 450 460 Lilydale 765 800 825 Avg. Pop.& Call Mendota 4.55 4.5 4.45 Lilydale 8 8.35 8.45 Projected Billing M Hts. :lendota 30,409 31,198 34,767 Lilydale 53,466 57,890 66,019 Billing Inc. Admin Fee 57 31,929 32,758 36,505 �?;�`" 56,139 60.784 69,320 ~:� . -:i 1) 57 increase + new officer when added (86 & 88) again 91. 2) Deprec 2.35 cars per year. 3) Radio investment @ 50,000 deprec 10 years. 4) Lilydale: Riverrain 30 units in 1987, apt 30 units 88 & 89. • ,� _ � :'; .; '1 . .. �� 1989 823,000 8,000 23,500 5,000 859,500 39,500 820,000 9,000 245 550 6,100 470 850 4.4 8.55 36,080 70,110 37,884 73,615 1990 864,000 10,000 24,000 5,000 903,000 41,000 862,000 9,400 250 560 6,300 480 875 4.35 8.45 37,497 72,839 39,372 76,481 1. ar�d Use Relail% Recrealfon 0lflce/Other Conmerc I a 1 Ilotel Residentlal Coriver�t ian Center �s�a3oe-�t�ot x3 Tat� le 1 I.ANU USE COhIPAk ( SON Bloominglan Alrport Souih Sladinm Site Corn�7 .#' 1 ari Geracr {c E i S Ger�ci• {c E! S Alrport So, Uist. Mall of Mierlca !L Fatitasyworld 344,000 sq. ft. 900�Wf1 sq, ft. 900,OOU sq. ft. 6,00O�OOU sq. fl. 8,26q,000 sq. ft. 7,546,OOU sq. ft. 2,f�fJ0,OQ0 sq, ft. Z,(7�0,000 sq. ft, 4,3Q0 rnams 4�300 rooms E340 ruoms 2�Q00 rooms 3�750 uiiits 3�510 urilts 700 units 0 units Q sq, ft. 0 sq. ft. 0 sh. ft. 1,OUO,OOp sq. ft. Existing llirpart South and Mall of ltmer icaJFar�t asywor ld 6,000,000 sq. Ft. 5,437,Q00 s�. ft. 4,565 roorns 1,119 unils �,aaa,000 s�. rc. The city"s corrtprehensive plan projec�ed daily trips from the airport south district at 173,000. Data from the regional trip model indicates that the trip generation from the airport south/Mall of America and Fantasyworld will be approximately 50 percent greater than projected in the comprehensive plan. The staging of the proposed development in the generic EIS was based on completion by 2005; the Mall of America and Fantasyworld proposes a 1990 completion date. A substantial change in s�aging of development affects the timing and funding for regional services. ' ' ,. � , ' _ _ � �,� , � �, � � qa / ', / . � • + � - ¢w y 53 `, ,== .,.._ �` • �. / � � `i �gb �, j ) � �o % / � �l � � �� -� i �� 7.�• , f � �99. 3 \ • / -� �,�j�s�' 1 %. � -/ / � . r ,� • . `' . �.�4 3�'.�z•� � -'�— � • � . � � . � , f , -� i � � '� �'' - • � j!�%,' �; l � .•�' � rj� ,` � p ' : � . `� vn�, , o / • ' „ '� _ _ ., �� ' � � .. '/r ''! ' �` t , 'u. x / . , � /. �;. ��"�' , x! �� /��' _�;� � ��';` ' r y � 1 �'.. � o n . . ; ' - ' .%�� . . �r • � ' � `t � r '� �b 'I°� �9�' .' � �-�. . �� ; 'i L ..... - •;" S / . , , ; � , �.'' �' . , ; �, , ,. � ,. �; .�� '�/�, , ; y ,q,. � �� , j ,. '8! w � _ , ,. �.�./ � , r ` � � � • f , / ', �' . / � ¢o o - I t t �/ ,' J � 1 , -_"��1... � ' � / . �� o �. / � U � �a/ � � ' { \� � � /O � ' ' ` J� ��, .'r"'._ • . ,' � /� � , � � � � j 7 ! � � } � w o /%� ` r � ' //'' , ' �'�J �, % f ' ' f, tl �'o` '�' l��J,I o / � / j�l� ' rfJf l . ,. � / f, �.-- � �,,1 +t - ' I 4` 0 �, t/ GE \ / �. � . ,� / . . _ I � .� t1, ' _...�^.."�.....", � ,.r:'..t ' � 9i /� � !_ . / � i � � : � � /� 1 � / ! � � ,+ + `� . � � (�V � y .r-, =."""'" ..i. \ � � � � 1 G/tr � {�`c � � , •• '�� `i Y/ / ' r �� -. \ � �/ /; / ., �� o/� I � V � L_'"'--"""�'�--��-�-^ }. " �' `' • � i ' •� �� /� 1 vv� . ,�\ " ' � ' ��s' � / 1'` �'�'� 1 ; ' I . � �' � - p�� ' � , � %�,/ -' , r • • • \ ' � i� � �9-� �pr �� / / � , 1 i � A q � , . �,¢ ' �� . � f � / , � . "1 � '�/ •> � r � 6 — -- . i� .%'" . , .�,r, / �� . � / •/ ' //r. � � / '/ /; / ; ,� �, � r , � � ' ! , i.�' � /: , � / f �� / ' �t p3� � S �.�{', � / / �� i'! �•,� � l, � I ��. t __ - (/� /I ! ' + � �►� ^� � n � - � �� r' �• ' / O // po� � - _ /Y , / ' � /(rj .� � `, / . X � '"/ J� � ` ` ` / � % ,, ' ', AJ � p, p' �► �. i �-' � � � /� ' � • 3,� ' i �� _ � " � � ` � ' / v ��`j�� ,�_ ' � - , ' . � i � � � � / . j.. •i :< �°' `> > _`fs��►" �+� � i � �,�' . _ � r // � . � `�`•, i / � � /. i''• ,,.�p �{� ^ ` ` f � /C��q„ � i i I / i I � / / ! �' i � � ! �' , � ` � �G/T'4��Q'�� Yr.wcV / I r ! f . - - � -- � �a � ?- r" , ` /, � - .,' % � l � �' / � � �1 I Q' ; � . pII.��y�rsccx-,. �� iy ' � � `� ' ` ii�� - < ,•� � � % � ' � , '' r � R � �wt�OA •!�4'�17R: .,sia � �. , � � � � � � , . �-a � � �, / , , . � �, f � , � / � , , b� � � 'fiovsE cfJ'r'-y� f n , '� , \ \ ` � .�\ � ' � ' �. �// �� /. i f , / r� / 1 t � i � / , x�/ 3,0 ,� � �` �� !3 i . � � � � i � � � �� i � � � � � ` . � \ ` � \\,� ` y �' {t„' f t� / � ' .i�''� ' ,/ �//' ,� `t 1 � � 7 ;� <'09� ` �/%, Q �.j { -..r—t"r��'r- ' � , ;J `i, ;• ' ' , � � ` \ \ � \ \� � , ` � i � �j� ' � ' � �� , � ! . ! � �.32,./OCl ; � �c�� ' � • � 1� � � : � \ \ \� � 1`� { ' . , 'j� /.' • � _ , � i � I " � � ` � i �.,'I j� .. ` \ � ' ' r / ` ` ! '� � , ' . . ? t � _ r �` � � , � �' J \ \ \ ` \ ` ' j � rt • / � / ' 1 J I I' /� r r�% � , � � i' �. �. � ! `\ � , � � t` �,,. / / \ ` \ � � //' \' / � -a t .. ' � ` � - ^ _ � ` / \ \ \ ' , • r ' ,, . � `\' ` � ' ' ��'. � � J � ��; � j l �/' ! e�ti! �` � �'._ � � `�—� �` , h� ( =l,, i ' / . \ 1 • - • � ti _ ` ` '. 'i �, � / ,/ . `v � \ ' � , � � '�� i � \ � . ` \ t � f � '� � �` :. * � � , • 1 � ! � � � / i \ l l ��-�y'''J �� 4 � � � � � _ � ..�'' � � ` � �, � �. ' J ~ � \ � i l(� � � ! � � � � � � � �� ! 1 /� `� � Y I ;' , ; � •ao � � u� \ � � ? ,' i t �- � ` ` , .c , .. , � . / ..•�i�� ` 2� - — - ` �-• - - `. ` ! l, t .'". _ l � � . � '' 1 � _ � ��' , ,^ � ' � �Q��E , _ -- . _ ._ _ _ _ , �, � + ; �] �., ` , ` ` i � O.� ! (j' ' i i � .� �' � !J � � •�( I � ' ` ` 1? �' ' 1 r`� ` ` � � ' � � � � E � . , t � { t � � � / ` �i`/Otl Sp {y _ [/�\ � �„ r �•.. r `� t' �4! � � � 1 � j�roh• . � `{ � ` ' ' � ' � \ � � ` _ .i � / �,�s` . 1 9 I!! .. / . O "„' r rO'�� "j`, \ ` _ 1 � i � i �' n � , ' 1 � ( � � � ` � � t ` , �. � '`�` " // f ► .�iPsy� • .� ' � i`� �� P1r�E � � � � �_ � ti � ' `!� & g+.7. � ,` ovs e � � � ` � r�'' � � . - � t � . tiy .3orb�,�� Po , � � � . � �' � ' � _ � , ` � ` \ �,, � 1° ,,� . � , ' � ; �� ; =�� . � � `� •'y " .\ ,`1� � //'' �"�'"� �� Bgi �°aK -__._.... _ \ .� �i �� , ;. � ' . \ ' / � ` r ; t � � � , � �` � � ` `` ` � � �� ;� ,� � ,�� 7; ��' � BS� � . ` �� `� � \�;, : � ` �`900 ,1 , \ � � ` � \ \ . . \ \ �� K � t}�I° ��\ "�LM' ��155�� / � - 2 � r } Sg ��' � �• `� `� `*� � . � - ` ` , � ` \ � � - . � � - � � _: aP � ! � � �S p a p � o ' ' ` �, 0� , t- � � \�' � +' � — . � � . � � 1 � � � � . ; . _ � \ .� �°ra� , `'t ` , � ,,, , ,s� N� � �, ; t— _ I a. � . � , , � . �_ ..�� --__ ` � . — ��` f� �0 s -.. / � . � � � ' , � , � \ ` \ . \ . \ \ � � � i` .. t, 4�E � ` \ �i Uyp� X, '� �^ - t ` ', " • . , \ \ � � � ` _ \O � � 8 Q`\ . .! � � \ ` _ � ,. � ' /� � � ' � �, ` • . � i ` 9 �� , `"r . -"t� � � t . . ` 1 � � :� o � ` : \ 1 `� � � � � �'1 ' � . - . � � . � \ �'�'S�b �s �` �� ` ' '��,`°�� "� ', " � � . � .� \�,�,�� ` � ` ,- � � , - � � � ^ \ `• :/ � �r ,� � � ;� t � � - . � � , i . — -_._ ,._ ,_ � ` . I ,�� w..Y''A'�`' - !�„ 1 `-` . - ` �` . _ \ , \ , `� • �� , ,�� .�� '. . �� ^'' � ` � ` , . � � \ � � � � �.� _�-..�� ' ` � 3� �� -�� t � � \ `�, ' '•:`� � :� \:�� -. � ; .� ..� ��,,� �� _' ,` . e$° � �-�, � � . �l — ��;�� i 1 t '1. l � - \ � •.t - , o � - \ . � . \ ` ... \ �` ��tl°� �? �� , �.. . ! .- � ` .f ..` \ � � ` ♦ ry ,` J � _ � _ �_ ` --_.. ._.,_ � _,.�, .:` Al .l, -� ' \ � ; � \ ' ..=,-. • t h �� , �, ,-'�• . � � �� . /j� ` 3 . �� 7j- . ��+'��il�.".ae,� � ? , ~ ., . \ ' 1 ". ` '...` „ : \ � � � \ Y� ` � \ � `— �' � Ir�... -.�..�� , �� •�_�� . -,. . ' l ` � \ i � ` i . � . ��` .1��:;:�~`, '�":..' � - � � - - .� �-..',t W- "' . � : . '�t . ; � � �� . . . �1��`��"``�:�"r'M'�. `....�i. l ' „_ -,. ' � `j` - �\ \�� 'x�' , y � ,• >�'� , ..� . � ' � , � � >� ,1,� `.\ - 2�0 /O(� `' � � � � ".. „"� �� rr —• . � , '",y�+,. �� ~ , � ;,\ ; _ , -Q `` ' _ .0 � "� i � _ ",� � - . � ' S�{ � , ,� • - . , � `i�yy� M+��•v•"�`.hl-.•.t;\��•~'" .S '� ; 1 \ . � • ' Ys " `� +� `�:a��•''`� . ?��"�!Sf'_�L `� t dRL��1'�Vti`j�..i, `Y .. � `+ .. ` . � .� � � a . '� � . \ l � —. �� ,,,, ' . �'-�-�, - ��•,._. '�'�,'�• ,;,,�'�:�,� `�+a�e�{4�; ww�s-r-'�..:` , ` \ - � . . . / � �%�� - : - �\ - ' F � � t-,C,' . . . '/ r' ,. . " , ��1"e^�-....Y..,. _,-. �y:��"t�'.?�i.�" �`'.�9rx.a"`�`bt�i.: •;y�i-yx�.,^�^�' �=. \.4"'_'z. \ \ � - ' \ ` ° _ ` \ \ . .. •/ . . _ _ _ t ^, _ \ � � ' � Y' - - . _ .� .. . --