1991-11-05CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
November 5, 1991 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption
4. Approval of the October 15th Council Minutes
5. Consent Calendar
a. Acknowledgment of the October 19th Special Planning
Commission Minutes.
b. Acknowledgment of the October 22nd Planning Commission
Minutes.
c. Acknowledgment of the October Building Report.
d. Acknowledgment of the September Fire Department Report.
e. Acknowlegment of Kennsington Plat Change.
f. Approval of a Purchase Order for Kensington Grading.
g. Approval to Purchase Additional Recycling Containers.
h. Approval to Solicit Bids for Replacement of a Backhoe.
* i. Approval of the List of Contractors. (Available
Tuesday)
* j. Approval of the List of Claims. (Available Tuesday)
End of Consent Calendar
6. Public Comments
7. Bid Award
* a. Removal of Schouveiller House - (Available Tuesday)
8. Unfinished and New Business
a. CASE NO. 91-38: Landkamer - Variance
b. CASE NO. 91-39: Schuster - Variance
c. CASE NO. 91-35: Knaeble - Subdivision
d. Discussion on Ivy Falls Creek Improvement - Phase I
(Brassard) Job No. 8814A
e. Discussion on 1992 CDBG Allocation.
f. Discussion on Zoning Administration and Policies.
g.
Discussion on Legislative Policies for 1992.
** h. "Storm of the Century" Follow Up.
9. Council Comments
12. Adjourn
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ
SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for November 5th Council Meeting
November 5, 1991
Information is being submitted for items 5i., 5j., and 7a.,
already scheduled on the agenda (*). Item 8h. has been added to
the agenda (**).
3. Agenda Adoption
It is recommend that Council adopt the revised agenda printed
on green paper.
5i. List of Contractors.
See attached list.
5j. List of Claims.
See attached claims list.
7a. Removal of Schouveiller House
See attached memo.
8h. "Storm of the Century" Follow Up
See attached memo from Public Works Director Jim Danielson.
MTL:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
November 5, 1991 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption
4. Approval of the October 15th Council Minutes
5. Consent Calendar
a. Acknowledgment of the October 19th Special Planning
Commission Minutes.
b. Acknowledgment of the October 22nd Planning Commission
Minutes.
c. Acknowledgment of the October Building Report.
d. Acknowledgment of the September Fire Department Report.
e. Acknowlegment of Kennsington Plat Change.
f. Approval of a Purchase Order for Kensington Grading.
g. Approval to Purchase Additional Recycling Containers.
h. Approval to Solicit Bids for Replacement of a Backhoe.
i. Approval of the List of Contractors. (Available
Tuesday)
j. Approval of the List of Claims. (Available Tuesday)
End of Consent Calendar
6. Public Comments
7. Bid Award
a. Removal of Schouveiller House - (Available Tuesday)
8. Unfinished and New Business
a. CASE NO. 91-38: Landkamer - Variance
b. CASE NO. 91-39: Schuster - Variance
c. CASE NO. 91-35: Knaeble - Subdivision
d. Discussion on Ivy Falls Creek Improvement - Phase I
(Brassard) Job No. 8814A
e. Discussion on 1992 CDBG Allocation.
f. Discussion on Zoning Administration and Policies.
g -
Discussion on Legislative Policies for 1992.
9. Council Comments
12. Adjourn
Page No. 3138
October 15, 1991
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, October 15, 1991
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the
City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers
Blesener, Cummins, Koch and Smith.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Abstain: 1 Blesener
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of the
revised agenda for the meeting.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the
minutes of the October 1, 1991 regular meeting
with corrections.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Councilmember Smith moved approval of the
consent calendar for the meeting along with
authorization for execution of any necessary
documents contained therein.
a. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the
October 8th Park and Recreation Commission
meeting.
b. Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's monthly
report for September.
c. Acknowledgment of the Code Enforcement
monthly report for September.
d. Acknowledgment of a report on Parks and
Recreation Commission attendance record.
e. Approval of a modified site critical area
site plan for W.F. Bauer Construction, to
allow construction of a single family home
at 1245 Knollwood Lane (Lot ,10, Block 1,
Ivy Hills West 2nd Addition).
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Page No. 3139
October 15, 1991
f. Adoption of Resolution No. 91-74, "A
RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO ALLOW THE PLACEMENT OF THREE
REMOTE NOISE MONITORING TOWERS."
g.
Adoption of Resolution No. 91-75,
"RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING THE
REASSESSMENT OF DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS OF
VICTORIA TOWNHOMES."
h. Acknowledgment of the draft 1992 AMM
Legislative Policies.
i. Approval of the list of contractor
licenses dated October 15, 1991 and
attached hereto.
J•
Approval of the list of claims dated
October 15, 1991 and totalling
$194,666.65.
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Mr. Joe Maegher was present with respect to
air noise. He asked for information on
location of the noise monitors, and if any are
proposed to be located north of T.H. 110.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder responded,
stating that permanent monitors were approved
for Mohican Court, the Furlong area and the
Curley's neighborhood. He explained that MAC
will also have "roving" monitors, capable of
taking readings from anywhere in the City,
available, and that the City has informed MAC
of potential sites for the monitors in Mr.
Maegher's neighborhood and near Sibley, as
well as other sites south of T.H. 110. He
informed Mr. Maegher that he does not know the
timetable for these monitors.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he believes MAC
has indicated it would be at least a year
before the movable monitors will be available.
He also explained that the purpose of the
monitors is to determine noise intensity, not
to determine where aircraft are flying.
Mr. Maegher was particularly concerned over
increased air traffic from runway 4. He asked
what has transpired on the air noise issue in
1
v
BOND SALE
Page No. 3140
October 15, 1991
the past three years and why the City must
share in noise over Highland Park. He also
asked where the northern boundary of the
corridor is.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he has received
more complaints about aircraft noise during
the test period than he did before the test.
He further stated that he does not think much
has changed. He pointed out that he has spent
four years on the aircraft noise problem and
there is not very much the City can do about
it - in his judgment the noise in Mendota
Heights has not been alleviated because the
procedure for non -simultaneous departure has
not been followed. He stated that the reason
for the noise problem is that the south
boundary was established by a memorandum in
the 1970's but no north boundary has been
established. Although the situation is
totally inequitable, there is nothing Mendota
Heights can do about it. He suggested that an
air noise litigation fund be established in
the hope that $25,000 to $30,000 can be raised
through contributions from residents.
Donations would be recorded so that they can
be returned if the fund is not used. The
purpose of the fund would be to take MAC and
the FAA to federal district court to find out
what is so indelible about the southern
boundary which the agencies have refused to
change. Mayor Mertensotto informed Council of
a letter he received from a Northwest Airlines
Captain.
Mr. Maegher stated that if a litigation fund
is established, he will contribute.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he sees no
alternative but to attack the matter head on
and not at the expense of the tax -payers. He
informed Council that he has asked the City
Administrator to explore setting up an escrow
fund.
Council acknowledged and discussed tabulations
of bids received for the sale of $1,015,000
Park Bonds and $1,030,000 Improvement Bonds.
Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of
Resolution No. 91-76, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
BID ON SALE OF $1,030,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1991, PROVIDING FOR THEIR
ISSUANCE AND LEVYING A TAX FOR THE PAYMENT
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
BID AWARD, BRIDGEVIEW
SHORES 3RD ADDITION
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
HEARING - EASEMENT
VACATION (KENSINGTON)
Page No. 3141
October 15, 1991
THEREOF," awarding the sale
Investment Services, et al,
interest rate of 6.053%.
Councilmember Koch seconded
to Norwest
for their low net
the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of
Resolution No. 91-77, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
BID ON SALE OF $1,015,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
PARK BONDS OF 1991, PROVIDING FOR THEIR
ISSUANCE AND LEVYING A TAX FOR THE PAYMENT
THEREOF," awarding the sale to Piper Jaffray &
Hopwood, Inc., et al, for their low net
interest rate of 6.255%.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Public Works Director Danielson reviewed a
tabulation of bids received for improvements
to serve the Bridgeview Shores Third Addition.
Mayor Mertensotto informed Council that
Bernard Friel had notified him that he and
Marvin Anderson Homes are involved in a
boundary dispute and that the Bridgeview
Shores contractor has been working on his
property.
Public Works Director Danielson responded that
he is aware of the dispute but felt that that
is a different issue from installation of the
public improvements. He pointed out that the
lots abutting Mr. Friel's property are large
and that the dispute involves the rear lot
lines, which would not be affected by the
improvement project.
Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of
Resolution No. 91-78, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER AND STREET
CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE BRIDGEVIEW SHORES 3RD
ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 91, PROJECT NO. 5),"
awarding the contract to Excel Utilities for
their low bid of $138,922.50.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the
purpose of_.a public hearing on an application
from Centex Homes for vacation of a drainage
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
MENDOTA INTERCHANGE
STORM SEWER
Page No. 3142
October 15, 1991
and utility easement across the easterly lot
line of Lot 5, Block 2, Kensington PUD.
Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and
comments from the audience.
There being no questions or comments,
Councilmember Cummins moved that the hearing
be closed.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of
Resolution No. 91-79, "RESOLUTION APPROVING
VACATION OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT."
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Council acknowledged a report from Engineer
Eckles regarding storm sewer cost sharing for
the Mendota Interchange highway project. In
his report, Mr. Eckles informed Council that
Mn/DOT proposes an $803,000 cost to the City
and recommended that the City retain Barr
Engineering, for a cost not to exceed $11,000,
to prepare a city storm water plan and assist
staff in negotiating a significant reduction
in the cost proposed by Mn/DOT.
Mayor Mertensotto asked how the storm sewer
cost will be financed. Treasurer Shaughnessy
responded that the Tax Increment Plan provides
the ability to finance cost of storm sewer
improvements and that he would propose that
financing be primarily by Tax Increment
funding and to a lesser degree by assessment.
He informed Council that it appears that the
majority of the land affected is cemetery
property. He further stated that while the
preliminary figure from Mn/DOT is
astronomical, it is hoped that by the time the
project is bid the City staff will have
negotiated a much smaller final figure.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the letter from
Barr Engineering to Public Works Director
Danielson is appropriately stated - Barr would
make a presentation to Council and Council
would select an option. He stated that he
does not want Barr to meet with Mn/DOT until
Council has discussed and selected an option.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
REVIEW BOARD PROCESS
Page No. 3143
October 15, 1991
Councilmember Cummins moved to reject the
Mn/DOT proposal for the assessment against the
City and to retain Barr Engineering for an
amount not to exceed $11,000, with the
understanding that Barr will appear before
Council for review and selection of an option
before meeting with Mn/DOT.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Council acknowledged a memo from Administrator
Lawell and a letter from County Assessor Pulju
with respect to implementation of a revised
Review Board process which would transfer City
Review Board duties to the Dakota County Board
of Equalization.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he does not
agree with the proposal and was not aware that
the County went before the legislature for
adoption of legislation to allow the revised
process. He further stated that while he
realizes that the local Board procedures are
costly to the County, but in most cases there
is a follow up on valuations of properties
questioned at the Review Board meeting. He
stated that what he does not like is that
Council would be giving up rights as a Review
Board and another avenue for people to be
heard by their local elected officials would
be taken away. He noted that he would be
willing to work with the County on
streamlining procedures so that residents can
appear locally and sign written inquiries, and
then let the County respond to them and make
appointments to see the properties. He did
not see the benefit in making the process more
removed from the residents.
Councilmember Cummins agreed, stating that
Council has too few opportunities to meet with
the tax payers. He suggested that Council
might watch for a year and see what happens in
other cities which adopt the new procedures
before Council takes the irrevocable step of
implementing the procedures.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he agrees that
the existing process is burdensome for the
Assessor's Office and would gladly work with
the County to streamline the process.
ADJOURN
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 3144
October 15, 1991
Councilmember Blesener stated that she agrees
with the statements about tax -payers
addressing the Council but that the thrust of
the proposal is to better serve the residents
so that they do not have to sit at the Board
of Review for three or four hours before
meeting with an assessor.
It was the consensus that the Administrator be
directed to communicate to the Assessors
Office that they should make it clear to
residents that they have the option to submit
written notice of objection to valuations in
lieu of attending the Board of Review. Staff
was directed to include an article in the
Heights Highlites to inform residents that
Council has elected not to transfer local
Board of Review powers to the County.
There being no further business
the Council, Councilmember Koch
meeting be adjourned.
Councilmember Blesener seconded
to come before
moved that the
the motion.
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 8:45 o'clock P.M.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
October 15, 1991
Masonry License
Jack's Concrete & Masonry, Inc.
Gas License
Inver Grove Heights Htg. & Cooling, Inc.
General Contractors Licenses
Custom Pools, Inc.
Home Enhancers, -Inc.
Linert Construction
Thordson, J. -Construction Co.
Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses
Inver Grove Heights Htg. & Cooling, Inc.
Rumpca Services, Inc.
Sign Licenses
Schad -Tracy Signs, Inc.
Universal Sign Co.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 19, 1991
A special meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was
held on Saturday, October 19, 1991, beginning at the City Hall
Conference Room, 1101 Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to
order at 9:00 o'clock A.M. The following Commission members were
present: Friel, Dreelan, Krebsbach and Tilsen. Also present were
Public Works Director Jim Danielson and Administrative Assistant
Kevin Batchelder.
CASE NO. 91-35
KNAEBLE SUBDIVISION
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
ADJOURN
The Commission reviewed the revised preliminary plat plan
submitted by the applicant. The Commission discussed the
applicant's response to Outlot A, city sewer and water,
elevations, tree survey and Wetlands Ordinance.
The Planning Commission visited the site at 1760 Dodd
Road. At the site the Planning Commission reviewed
property lines and the stakes for the proposed houses.
The Planning Commission discussed the alignment of the
new lots with the neighbors and the owners who were
present during the tour. The Planning Commission also
toured the Ridder property. The Planning Commission also
toured the wetlands area at the end of Ridgewood Court.
There being no further business, the Planning Commission
adjourned their special meeting at 11:00 o'clock A.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
OCTOBER 22, 1991 -
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was
held on Tuesday, October 22, 1991, in the City Hall Council
Chambers, at 7:45 o'clock P.M. The following members were present:
Friel, Dwyer, Krebsbach and Duggan. Commissioner Koll had informed
the Commission she would be absent. Commissioner Dreelan informed
the Commission she would be late. Commissioner Tilsen was
unexcused. Also present were Public Works Director Jim Danielson,
Planning Consultant John Uban, Administrative Assistant Kevin
Batchelder and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Duggan moved approval of the September 24,
1991, Minutes.
Commissioner Friel seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Friel moved approval of the October 19,
1991, Special Meeting Minutes, with corrections.
Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
CASE NO. 91-38:
LANDKAMER -
VARIANCE
Mr. John Landkamer was present to discuss his request for
a seven foot (7') side yard setback variance and an eight
foot (8') front yard "housekeeping" variance to allow
construction of a single -stall garage. He explained that
he will be demolishing the existing single -stall garage
and replacing it with a slightly larger single -stall
garage.
Chair Dwyer explained that because Mr. Landkamer was
unable to receive signatures of consent from all of his
neighbors within one hundred feet (100') of his property,
that the Planning Commission is conducting a public
hearing for this Case.
Chair Dwyer opened the meeting for public comment.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
October 22, 1991
Page 4
with the proposal. She further commented that they are
willing to work with the City Engineering Department.
She stated that they feel that this plan will be
aesthetically pleasing and that preservation of the
Wetlands is important.
Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public hearing.
Mr.- Jim Fischer,* 1758 Dodd Road, stated that he has no
problem with the proposal. He stated that he wants to
see the stream stay the way it is.
Commissioner Duggan moved to close the hearing.
Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion.
In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Mr.
Knaeble stated that the distance between garage to garage
will be of the typical house pad. He stated that it will
be fifteen feet (15').
Commissioner Friel expressed concerns relating to the
preservation of trees and the Wetlands. Mr. Knaeble
stated that there has been a tree survey completed. He
stated that about four (4) trees will be eliminated.
Commissioner Duggan stated that he would like, to see
those trees replaced with trees of like value.
Commissioner Krebsbach questioned Mr. Knaeble if he
anticipates a possible subdivision at the end of the
proposed driveway. Mr. Knaeble stated that at this time
he does not and that that would entail the City granting
easements and more Wetlands Permits.
In response to a question from Commissioner Dreelan,
Public Works Director Danielson stated that City code
requires a minimum of twenty feet (20') between a in
length for a driveway. Planning Consultant Uban stated
that the existing driveway is fifty-two feet (52') and
that the proposed driveway is scaled at forty-two feet
(42')
Commissioner Krebsbach questioned if future development
(to the south) were developed, would a cul-de-sac be
constructed.
Commissioner Krebsbach stated that criteria should be
addressed now for how the City will address flag lots.
She stated that in the future other requests may come in
to
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
October 22, 1991
Page 5
related to flag lots and the City should start setting
standards regarding access, setbacks, preservations of
trees, etc.
Chair Dwyer stated that he felt the question was one of
the comfort level of the Planning Commission in allowing
this development and its affect on the surrounding
property. Chair Dwyer stated that most concerns have
been addressed and this development won't affect the
development of the surrounding property.
In response to a question from Commissioner Friel, Mr.
Knaeble stated that they anticipate construction starting
in the Spring.
Commissioner Friel moved to recommend that the City
Council grant the Wetlands Permit and to approve the
preliminary plat conditioned upon Outlot A being combined
with the property to the south.
Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion.
Commissioner Krebsbach moved to recommend that the City
Council consider purchasing the vacant lot on the corner
of Marie Avenue and Dodd Road to prevent future
development and to provide access off of Marie Avenue.
Commissioner Friel seconded the motion.
Commissioner Krebsbach moved to recommend that the City
Council request the State of Minnesota to replace the
trees on the southeast corner of Marie Avenue and Dodd
Road with trees of like value.
Commissioner Friel seconded the motion.
Public Works Director Danielson stated that the State did
submit plans for the drainage work they would be
correcting on the corner of Marie Avenue and Dodd Road.
He stated that the State did not indicate the amount of
trees they would be removing.
October 22, 1991
Page 6
MISCELLANEOUS
Chair Dwyer stated that Commissioner Friel had submitted
a letter to both Public Works Director Danielson and
himself requesting that the procedure of final platting
be given to the Planning Commission for their review at
the time of the request. He further stated that
Commissioner Friel is requesting that the section on land
and reclamation within City Ordinance No. 401 be revised.
Commissioner Krebsbach suggested that these items be
postponed for discussion at the November meeting so that
all of the Commission could be given an opportunity to
review Commissioner Friel's suggestions.
Planning Consultant Uban stated that he has prepared
Ordinances on tree preservation. He stated that if the
Commission so desires, he would prepare a sample
Ordinance and submit it to the Commission at their
November meeting.
Chair Dwyer directed City staff to include both a sample
of a tree preservation ordinance and Commissioner Friel's
letter of request on the November Planning Commission
Agenda.
VERBAL REVIEW
ADJOURN
Public Works Director Jim Danielson provided a verbal
review for the planning items at the previous City
Council meeting.
There being no further business, the Planning Commission
adjourned its meeting at 8:40 o'clock P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
MEMO
Date: 10-28-91
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer
SUBJECT: Building Activity Report for October 1991
CURRENT MONTH
BUILDING
PERMITS: No. Valuation Fee Collected
SFD 7 1,241,890.00 10,545.17
APT 0 0 0
TOWNHOUSE 0 0 0
CONDO 0 0 0
MISC. 34 343,420.00 5,163.53
C/I 5 70,400.00 1,168.20
Sub Total 46 1,655,710.00 16,876.90
.ADE
PERMITS:
YEAR TO DATE 91 YEAR TO DATE 90
No. Valuation Fee Collected No. Valuation Fee Collected
60 9,580,883.00 84,157.75 61 9,975,068.00 86,256.61
0 0 0 0 0 0
5 563,645.00 5,624.05 6 716,694.00 6,922.59
28 2,313,761.00 14,868.17 16 1,278,376.00 8,116.36
215 1,610,533.00 27,211.14 201 1,557,319.00 28,178.46
45 9,538,030.00 49,029.95 35 2,240,074.00 16,757.75
353 23,606,852.00 180,891.06 319 15,767,531.00 146,231.77
Plumbing 16 654.00 124 4,966.00 115 5,356.00
Water 18 90.00 137 685.00 101 505.00
Sewer 8 140.00 114 2,187.50 90 1,575.00
Heat, AC,
& Gas 34 1,813.50 166 12,602.00 145 16,316.35
Sub Total 76 2,697.50 541 20,440.50 451 23,752.35
Licensing:
Contractor's
Licenses 16
400.00
457
11,425.00
426 10,650.00
Total 138 1,655,710.00 19,974.40 11351 23,606,852.00 212,756.56 11196 15,767,531.00 180,634.12
NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac, and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee, and
valuation amounts.
MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT
SEPTEMBER 1991 MONTHLY REPORT
FIRE CALLS NO. 91157 - 91169
NUMBER OF CALLS: 1 3
ARE ALARMS DISPATCHED: NUMBER
ACTUAL FIRES
Structure - MH Commercial
Structure - MH Residential
Structure - Contract Areas
Vehicle - MH
Vehicle - Contract Areas
Grass/Brush/No Value MH
Grass/Brush/No Value Contract
MEDICAL
Assist
Extrication
HAZARDOUS SITUATION
Spills/Leaks
Arcing/Shorting
Chemical
Power Line Down
FALSE ALARM
Residential Malfunction
Commercial Malfunction
Unintentional - Commercial
Unintentional - Residential
Criminal
GOOD INTENT
Smoke Scare
Steam Mistaken for Smoke
Other
MUTUAL AID
2
5
2
2
1
TOTAL CALLS 13
STRUCTURE CONTENTS
MISC. TOTALS TO DATE
$2,500
TOTAL MONTHLY FIRE LOSSES
$0 $0 $2,500
$0
$10,850
$5,600
$18,500
$2,000
FIRE LOSS TOTALS MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ALL FIRES, ALL AREAS (MONTH) $2,500
MEND. HTS. ONLY STRUCT/CONTENTS
MEND. HTS. ONLY MISCELLANEOUS
MEND. HTS. TOTAL LOSS TO DATE
$36,950
$10,350
$19,000
$29,350
LOCATION OF FIRE ALARMS:
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MENDOTA •
SUNFISH LAKE
LILYDALE
OTHER
TOTAL
13
0
0
0
0
TO DATE
131
2
12
20
3
13 168
LAST YEAR
136
12
10
14
4
176
BILLING FOR SERVICES
AGENCY THIS MONTH TO DATE
MN/DOT
MILW. RR
CNR RR
OTHERS:
TOTALS:
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
WORK PERFORMED HOURS TO DATE LAST YEAR
FIRE CALLS
MEETINGS
DRILLS
WEEKLY CLEAN-UP
SPECIAL ACTIVITY
ADMINISTATIVE
FIRE MARSHAL
TOTALS
228 2853.5 3352
6 4 531.5 570.5
132 1108 688.5
35 262 819
195.5 1287 324
95 954 1058
92.5 753 634.5
842 7749 7446.5
FIRE MARSHAL'S TIME FOR MONTH
INSPECTIONS
INVESTIGATIONS
RE -INSPECTION
MEETINGS
ADMINISTRATION
SPECIAL PROJECTS
TOTAL
39
5.5
12.5
33
2.5
92.5
REMARKS: SEE OTHER SIDE FOR SYNOPSIS
FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY WORK PERFORMANCE FOR SEPTEMBER 1991
CALLS FOR MONTH
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
PERCENT
CLEAN
MONTHLY
GEN
OFFICER
SQUAD
ROOKIE
SPECIAL
13
CALLS
CALL
CALLS
ATTENDED
UP
DRILL
MTG
MTG
DRILL
DRILL
ACT.
YEAR TO DATE
ATT'D
HOURS
ATT'D
THIS
1
2
2
2
2
ADM
168
MONTH
MONTH
YEAR
YEAR
HOURS
HOURS
HRS.
HOURS
HOURS
HOURS
HOURS
HRS
43
CHIEF John Maczko
9
9
81
48%
2
2
3
4
65
ASST. Bill Lerbs
5
5
88
52%
3
2
3
4
7.5
30
CAPT. Keith Stein
8
8
111
66%
1
2
2
3
2
28
Paul Dreelan
10
10
98
58%
1
2
2
8
Mike Coonan
3
3
51
30%
1
2
2
2
Gordy Sklerven
10
10
102
61%
1
2
2
2
4
Ed Adrian
9
9
103
61%
1
2
2
2
4
Jim Perron
7
7
71
42%
1
2
2
2
8
Mike Marscullio
0
0'/0
Tom Shields
7
7
97
58%
1
2
2
2
4
Jerry Nelson, Jr.
6
6
29
67%
2
2
2
4
4
CAPT.Jamie Lerbs
9
9
96
57%
2
2
3
28
Bill Chisler
4
4
64
38%
1
2
2
Marc Connolly
10
10
74
44%
1
2
2
2
4
Dick Zwirn
8
8
75
45%
1
2
2
2
4
George Lowe
9
9
127
76%
2
4
2
3
4
6
Randy McNamara
1
1
37
22%
1
2
2
2
Mike Johns
3
2%
David Dreelan
10
10
121
72%
1
2
2
2
4
Scott Henning
8
8
17
40%
2
2
4
CAPT. Jeff Stenhauc
4
4
64
38%
1
3
2
Leroy Noack
10
10
116
69%
2
2
4
4
George Noack Jr.
2
2
52
31%
1
2
2
Tom Olund
2
2
34
20%
2
4
4
4
Mike Maczko
6
6
9 2
55%
1
2
2
2
Aaron Coates
7
7
90
54%
2
2
2
2
4
Walt Klarkowski
7
7
59
35%
1
2
2
4
Mark Kaufman
4
4
91
54%
1
2
2
2
5.5
Ken Weisenburger
1
1
1
2%
2
CAPT. Jim Kilburq
9
9
101
60%
1
2
2
3
2
29
Tom Weinzettel
5
5
54
32%
1
2
2
2
4
John Neska
8
8
89
53%
1
2
2
2
6.5
Ted Husnik
9
9
65
39%
1
2
2
2
1
John Lapakko
7
7
112
67%
1
2
2
2
4
Kevin Perron
3
3
47
28%
1
2
2
2
Tim Oster
6
6
67
40%
1
2
2
2
8
Roy Kingsley
5
5
71
42%
1
2
2
2
9.5
TOTAL FOR MONTH
228
TOTAL ATTENDED
35
32
26
5
30
0
28
TOTAL FOR YEAR
2853.5
TOTAL MAN HOURS
35
64
52
15
68
0
195.5
THIS MONTH
LAST MONTH
LAST YEAR
AVE. RUNS/MAN
7.13
)0000000= (
)000000000
AVE. MEN/RUN
17.54
14.61
16.65
AVE % FOR YEAR
49.29
48.83
48.17
SYNOPSIS
The department responded to 13 calls during the month
of September. None of the calls resulted in any serious
property loss to real estate. The department did respond to
a vehicle fire on September 3, 1991 at 8:54 P.M. Upon fire
department arrival at the Scenic Overlook on Highway 13 the
vehicle was found fully involved. Fire investigation
revealed that the vehicle was stolen and the evidence at the
scene showed that the vehicle fire was intentionally set. A
can of what appeared to be lighter fluid was found on the
passenger side of the vehicle. The 1984 Mercury Cougar was
listed as a total loss.
TRAINING
The monthly departmental was spent familiarizing all
firefighters with the techniques involved in relay pumping.
This procedure involves utilizing two or more pumpers and
moving large volumes of water from a main water source to a
remote area. This type of operation would be utilized in
the areas of Mendota, Sunfish Lake and on large structure
fires in the Industrial Park. The drill was conducted on
Enterprise Drive.
The monthly squad drills were reviewing the Standard
Operating Procedures for fighting structure fires within our
protection area. Firefighters were expected to pull the
proper hose lines off the attack truck and supply the attack
truck with water from the responding second truck.
OTHER NEWS
On Friday, September 27, 1991, the department took
delivery of its new Equipment/Command Vehicle.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini
FROM: James E. Danielson 1)
Public Works
SUBJECT: Kensington
DISCUSSION:
Change
October 31, 1991
Dr. Owens, whose land was being developed as part of the Kensing-
ton PUD, approached the City before the lawsuit settlement was
reached with Centex to request that a lot be created including
his homesite. He requested that this subdivision be allowed as a
lot split (without platting). Council agreed to allow his subdi-
vision provided that this lot then be included as a platted lot
when the Centex plat was finalized.
The Centex PUD was approved before Dr. Owens could finalize
his lot split and Dr. Owens' homesite was included as a lot
within their plat. This plat is currently being reviewed by the
County and they are insisting that Dr. Owens dedicate an addi-
tional 17 feet of right-of-way (making a total 50 feet) along
Delaware Avenue. Dr. Owens feels very strongly that he does not
want to dedicate this additional 17 feet to the County, he has a
significant oak tree and some shrubs that would then be on County
right-of-way. He feels hoodwinked by the City, he did not under-
stand that agreeing to plat his homesite as a lot would require
dedicating more right-of-way to the County.
He contacted City Hall and the Mayor to complain. I called
the County to see what the options were, and the only way the
County will not require the additional right-of-way dedication is
if Dr. Owens' lot is platted as an "Exception". We therefore
agreed to allow Centex to plat Dr. Owen's property as an excep-
tion.
ACTION REQUIRED:
None. For Council information only.
JED:dfw
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 28, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini a r
FROM: James E. Danie
Public Works Di =C' or
SUBJECT: Kensington Grading
Job No. 8917
DISCUSSION:
Council at their October 8, 1991 meeting awarded a purchase
order to Centex Homes from them to complete the mass grading of
Kensington Park. During discussion on the matter, the Mayor
asked if the entire site would be stripped of all organic or
swamp material before any filling began. I answered that I
thought that it would be. In the purchase order I prepared with
Centex, I included that all black dirt and organic material would
be stripped from the site before any filling began.
There is a low area on the park site adjacent to the freeway
that Centex had originally not intended to strip before filling.
Upon learning that we wanted all organic material removed, they
dug some test holes in the area and found the depth of organic
material to be 2-3 feet deep throughout. Removing this material
will increase their cut by over 3,000 cubic yards.
Centex requests an additional $2,600 or $0.85 a cubic yard
to complete this work.
RECOMMENDATION:
I recommend that this organic material be removed before
filling and that Centex be paid for doing the work at a cost not
exceed $2,600.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the recommendation they need
to pass a motion authorizing staff to increase the scope of work
on the original Kensington Grading purchase order to Centex to
provide for the removal of an additional 3,000+ cubic yards of
organic material at a cost of $2,600.
JED:dfw
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 31, 1991
To: Mayor, City Council and City Administ
From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist
Subject: Purchase of Additional Recycling Containers
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this memorandum is to request the authorization
to purchase 1,500 additional recycling containers.
DISCUSSION
Since our curbside recycling program began in 1989, the City
of Mendota Heights has purchased 3,200 recycling bins. Our
voluntary recycling program has now reached approximately 3,000
participating households and we are getting low in inventory to
meet demand. Dakota County has informed the local communities to
expect a replacement rate of five percent (5%) annually. The city
has replaced approximately 200 bins due to theft or loss.
The 1990 Census count estimated that there are 3,401
households in Mendota Heights and we are growing slowly with
housing starts in the neighborhood of 75 to 100 per year. The
additional 1,500 recycling bins would allow the City to cover all
new housing starts and to have replacement stock for the
foreseeable future. Our 1991 Joint Powers Agreement with Dakota
County includes $7,500 for purchase of recycling containers.
Rehrig-Pacific, our original container vendor, has lowered the
price on bins once again. The price per container has been lowered
from an original $5.01 in 1989, to $4.30 in 1990 to $3.61 in 1991
due to a decrease in resin material prices. The bin is made from
recycled plastic.
1,500 recycling containers $5,415
(at $3.61 per bin delivered)
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council so desires, they should pass a motion to approve
the purchase of 1,500 Husky -lite recycling containers from Rehrig-
Pacific Company for the total cost of $5,415.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini
FROM: Tom Olund
Public Works Superintendent
SUBJECT: Backhoe Replacement
DISCUSSION:
30, 1991
The City's existing backhoe/loader is now 14 years old. The
backhoe is a street department piece of equipment, that is'vital to
the operation of all departments, it is used equally by all. In the
winter the backhoe is used for mixing and loading the sand and salt
that is used for deicing streets.
This past year the backhoe was down for repairs often and was a
cause for delay in completing several important projects. Now the
tires are in need of replacement and the transmission jumps out of 1st
and 2nd gear while in use.
We need a reliable piece of equipment to mix and load sand and
salt for winter. A new backhoe was approved for purchase within the
preliminary 1992 budget, the final budget document does not get
adopted until the December 3, 1991 Council meeting. We have spoken
with our preferred backhoe supplier and they tell us that unless they
could find what we want on a lot somewhere, it would be several months
before one could be manufactured. We are in urgent need of a new
backhoe and ask that Council grant us approval to bid and order one as
soon as possible. Suppliers, even if we order the backhoe in 1991,
would not bill the City until after January 1992.
RECOMMENDATION:
The existing backhoe is old, very unreliable and now in need of
new tires and transmission work. I recommend that we purchase a new
machine as soon as possible to avoid having to spend any more repair
money on the existing machine. The new machine is estimated to cost
$78,000, with approximately $10,000 to be recovered as trade-in.
Funding for the backhoe is proposed to be by equipment certificates.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the recommendation they need to
pass a motion authorizing staff to solicit bids for 1992 budgeted
equipment in advance of final budget adoption. Bids would be present-
ed to Council for their review at their December 3, 1991 meeting.
TJO:dfw
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
November 5, 1991
Masonry License
Kozitza Construction, Inc.
Excavating Licenses
Danelke Excavating
Johnson Excavating
General Contractors Licenses
A -Men Construction
First Landmark Builders, Inc.
Foley Masonry, Inc.
Halley's Custom Homes, Inc.
Home of Your Own, Inc. -A
John, B.A.-Construction
Kastner, Albert-& Sons, Inc.
Kiewel & Associates
M.J.S. Construction
McBride, J.H.-Const. Co., Inc.
McGown, Thomas -Inc.
Metro Prairie Const. Co.
National Home Framers, Inc.
Rein, C.G.-Builders
Richgels Bros. Const.
Steven & Jackson C.R.
Ultimate Exteriors
Woodland Cabinet & Const. Co.
Heating & Air Conditioning. License
Dakota Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
•,•
;;;;;'•!•;•,..•
1
November 5, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Council
• CLAIMS LIST SUMMARY:
Total. Claims
Significant Claims
$ 194,194
American Natl Bank City Hall Lease 86,867
Med Centers Health insurance 8,902
MWCC Sewer Charge 36,049
Tripp Oil Gas 4,916
Unusual Claims
Motorola Radios Fire Dept
BFI Recycling
Knutson .
Mendota•Hghts Rubbish
Roadway Rubbish
Triangle Rubbish
2,502
2,816
2,263
4,357
1,056
750
6
Dept 10- Adm Dept 50-Rd&Bridge
_L-E'ngr 60 -Utilities `
5 Nov 1991 I1/5/91 Claims List 20 -Police 70-Parks
30-Fire 80-PlanningRape' 1
Tue 9:26 AM City of Mendota He1uhts 40 -CEO 85 -Recycling
90=Animal_Contral
3
emo un:
Ternp.
-
1
3
a
4
6
6
eck
Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount
5
6
7
8
7
6
9
' - dI0=I10-10 id calls- 13.08
1 A T & T 01-4210-020-20 ld calls 15.66.
-
9
10
11
12
10
11
12
"8. /4
Totals Terno Check Number 1
13
14
15
16
13
14
16
I erne Lheck Number
-
2 Earl F Anderson & Assoc 01-4420-050-50 sions 30.94
17
18
19
20
16
7
8
d Earl f Hndersc.n & Hssoc 01-44d0=050-50 sinns 1-7S730
-22
4 44.84
21
23
25
19
20
21
- bel c <.
a. _
Temp Check Number i 3
25
26
27
28
2 z
123
24
3 AT&T 01-4210-050-50 Nov svc 14.36
3 AT&T 01-4210-0700-70 Nov svc 14.36
29
30
3 3 22
25
26
27
., H I & I --15-4210-060-60 Ntyv svc 14.36
3•AT&T 01-4210-020-20 Nov svc 7.15
3 AT&T 01-4210-020-20 Nov svc 5.86
33
34
35
36
28
29
30
.i H I & t----01=-42T0--07k /0 "gtrly Chbs 10.50
--
18 66.59
37
38
39
40
31
32
m
iota's temp Lheck Number ,^
Y:M d .. ^. ... bf
Temp Check Number 4 ; .,
41
42
43
44
34
35
36
4 Ace Hardware 08-4335-000-00 solvs 1.27
4 Ace Hardware 08-4335-000-00 splys 9.88
45
46
47
48
37
39
- .t. >. ,. - _ 49
8 .^ 11.15 50
. Totals, Temp `Check Number" • 4., _ _ ; _- - 52
40
41
42
_ _ _
63
Temp Check Number 5 54
55
56
43
44
46
•. 5 Alexander Battery Worth • ^ - J- L - s'prlyy 135'.42 67
• 5 Alexander Battery North 01-4305-020-20', splys 190.84 58
` .. ,. -- ,. "_ a .. 59
60
47
48
61
Totals Temp Check Number 5 62
63
64
49
51
-TemNumber » 665
6 Al'»lied• Electrical Contr . . 16-4460-000-00. - Re 1305 Kendon La 120.00 . • >° - -. 67
62
53
54
- . _ - - . 1 - - - > - h - r r . - r r Re -'1306'.` -Kt rf darf--La - .. 1`C`8r'}'00 .. 69
70'
12 240.00 71
73
66
66
,k7
Totals. Temp Check Number ; 6 73
... .: .,, ... 13` 'a ," . - v ., M "74
Temp Check Number 7 . P 76
7.9
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
1
( 5Nc.v
Pane
• Tue 9:26 AM City of Mendota Heiohts
•
FT
em • ti' k- m , 1
2
Temp.' - 3
5
Check 6
Number Vendor Narne Account Code Comments Amount 6
7
5
7
- -. 12 , , ark —08=4200=000=00 lease-pym t 6T4G0.7 75 > 9
7 American National Bark • 08-4226-000-00 lease fee 398.25 - 10
1 z
711
(12
14 8 867.00— 13
Totals Temp Check Number 7 14
15
16
Temp
13
14
15
117
Ci Lk-Numbmi•' 9.17
- '.. 15
• ' 8 A T 0 M 01-4400-020-20 seminar 20.00 - 79
20
18
8 20.00 22
Totals Terno Check Number 8 23
24
zo
11
Temp Check Number 9 20-
27
26
22
'23
124
26
9 ErF I -01 -4c67 -X085=85 3arrthru-Sept-recvc•snn ; , 836. 50 129jI
30I
9 2.816.50 31II
32
Tc
26
67
}25
a s Trmp ChEck-NuTnber— 33
34
Temp Check Number 10 35
- - i37
129
30
10 Bangor, Data Systems 05-4330-490-15 Sent svc 97.50
10 Banyar, Data Systems 15-4220-133-60 Sept svc 438.75
FA rept
37
36
39
a0
42
43
44
31
.32
33
,• , • 0t-'4-.01-110-10 svc 106--00
_41
' 10 Baryon Data Systems 01-4220_133-10 . Sept svc. 438.75.
0 .,.., ` <. , < . . < <. , .. � . °
_- v .. - - j ,p -
-
34
36
36
40 - 1.081.00
Totals Temp Check Number 10'
Temp
45
46
47
37
39
Check Number 1 '
- 1 _
-' ;,•,°•' _ - ^, ,< '' ,.-, <", • ..: a, - , •. ,. .<
.,. 11. ,Barefoot Grass •` .01-4335-315-30 -' Oct ,svc ,. 136. 00 ' - ." '•
.. ,. .. .< .. ., .. ., - 7
49
50
51
52
40
41
42
--.
11 136.00
Totals Temp Check Number 11
53
54
55
56
44
45
Temp=Check Number ` 2' " ,
R - . Y ..` e ... " e ;..
°
12R
57
55
59
606
62
63
64
m
47
48
'.. -• ._Fi•—� :— ■ ,
--
12 480.00
49
5,
ber;
Totals: Temp Check 11lam65
, Temp Check Number 13 ,5, x <. <.
,. ,ter- .. .. .�, a. , `+ , - ,. .. "• .. ..
66
67
65
62
63
64
13 Boland Bros 01-4335-315-30 Sept svc 230.00
--
i3, ';0.0
69
70
71
74
fr
66
56
,�7
-. .<:<.�: - ., ,. ,TS
` Totals Temp Check Number "' 13 „ ,..`� > ,"`, .. < ,. `. '. ..
.Are.>
J
0
0
0
0
i
0
n
O
)
C_)
fi
1
5 Nov 1991 Claims List pane 3
Tue 9:27 AM City of Mendota Heiohts
1 emo ec ,un.-- 4 - 1
2 ... 2
• 3
3 Ternp.
4
ME'Ck - - -
5
Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments ' Amount 6
7
6 8
i y of Inver b a eloits 01=42.:0-1,—a=85 h waste UTl'-day ' ,...'i2.71. 9
8 -- 10
9 14 - 292.71 " 7
3
10 o a s I erno t;heck Number 14 13
11 - 14
12 Terno Check Number 15 5
6
13 -17
14 ° 15 Commercial Asphalt 01-4422-050-50 mix 1,319.42 16
9
16--20
- --
16 1b - 1..319.42 21
17 Totals Temp Check Number 15 22
18 23
24
19 n• - • ` r .- 6 25
20 „ Y•. - 26
21 16 Communications Center 01-4330-440-20 rors ' 56.00 27
28
-Center —1
CQOrnurllca ions , t
22 n5 =7i J�i�=4�YF Ln-c.L� rol�� i L9
23 16 Communications Center 01-4330-460-30 rors 2272 64.00 30
24 -- 31
32
25 48 - ' 3 z33
26 Totals Terno Check Number 16 34
27 35
• 36
26 1 erno Lheck Number 1 / -
37
29 36
30 17 Concrete Raisino Inc 35-4460-000-00 Re 2263 Fieldstone 165.00 39
40
__
32 17 - .-165.00 g. 42
33 Totals Ternp Check Number 17 -- 43
44
34 45
35 Ternp Check Number 18 46
36 47
49
37 18 Continental Safety Etj 01-4603-0510-J0 sptys , 33.75 49
.-- ` `M - - - -° 50
38
39 ,18' .. 33.75 51
53
40 lotais lernp Lrtecl Number 1d
63
41 54
42 Terno Check Number 19 55
56
44 19 Copy Duplicat-ing products - 01-4305-070-70" Oct copies 19.88 58
60
46 ly'.. 19.88 61
47 Totals Terno Check Number 19 62
63
48 64
Temp Check Number 65
50�
.� �- - 01-4422-050-50 • - , splys '., - 99.96..
6 20 Contech 67
69
53 G0 99.96 70
64 Totals Ternp Check Number 20 71
72
56 - < _ 73
56 Temp Check. Number 2i 74
7 , 75
2.9
WA J1L1 J -W 1 Y7- / W
10. 20
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
n
O
5 Nov 1991 Claims List • pane 4
Tue 9:27 AM City of Mendota Heiohts
'
2•a
-r . _ ' • _' . 2l
TTemp.'34
1
2
6
reek
Nurnber Vendor Narne Account Code Comments Amount
6
0
7
8
1190
1 • - -le446-Qr-+ oe-0210— -Re-1305-3306--Kendtrrr 1-92. 5:
'21 Creative Colors 01-4305-070-70 solys • 26.49
-^ 21 Creative Colors 01-4330215-70 '• splys 699.49
-Creative '-�1=�4330=21-5
9
9
10
11
13
11
12
2 Colors 7�h s-o•iys 1-75.0
---
105 1.112, 50
- -Ck-N7_uu L>=r-
13
14
16
16
13
'16
•L • ,
' Terno Check Nurnber 22 ,
17
19
20
16
17
118
22 Dahloren Shardlow Uban 01-4221-135-80 Seot retainer 1.408.00
22 Dahloren Shardlow Uban• 01-4220-135-80 balance SE area study 1.172.25
21
22
24
19
;20
21
••
44' , 21580.25
• Totais Ternp Check Number 22
25
26
27
122
23
24
Terno Check Nurnber 23
30
31
32
25•
26,
27
• ' • ech-I n --0-1----4-41D0-020-: iLl part -i n -9-1 -9i con 1, rcti L : , 11 file QF'-
`23 Dakota County Tech Inst 01-4400-020-20 Sept trno 300.00
--
AS
33
34
35
36
Fa 23 L,500.7-00
29 Terno Check Nurnber38
30
-tnnLEr --.
37
39
40
31 4
33 ,,,'t,;,24 James Dani e1 son A, .., .a. , .r ,05-4415-105-15 -' , ._ Nov e ,allow,-;,- -120.00 , r 43
44
45
35 24 120.00 46
36 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 24 47
48
49
38 Terno Check"Number•25 • .. . •a'.. ' .� _ >�50
51
40 25 Discorn of Minri Inc 01-4330-460-3e1 rors 31.30 52
63
41 25 Discorn of Minn Inc 01-4330-460-30 rors 31.50 54
42 25 Discorn of Minn Inc 01-4330-460-30 rprs 36.10 56
Discorn 56
:5 of Nin IrIL, 01-433@ 460-511 bcitteriss 104.1G 57
f4 25 Discorn of Minn'Inc 01-4330-440-20.-„ . rprs =:; 56.50 58
45 -r` 25 ,Discorn of Minn Inc - 01-4330-460-30 -• • `, rprs .' `.. �< - '88.00 . `- ^, 59
60
61
47 25 Discorn of Mina Inc 05-4330-490-15 rors 105.00 62
48--- 63
CLetel 64
49 . r . > - . - . . • ,600.99 . 65
50 -Totals Ternp-•Check Nurnber 25 ::o; ra'' 66
.:4.• ... .., 6761 a .
Ternp Check Number 26
668
62 9
53 70
64 26 Day Timers Inc 01-4301-110-10 software 26.93 71
72
56'{ ^ 26 ;,, a.. * x. , ...E ,- , ''� _ M t .. ,.. .,';. . a ,z ._, ^ �, •26.93 ^ ,. . .a 24
c .-,.a 'Totals Ternp Check .Number. ^ 26 , e 75
79
0
0
0
0
0
0
()
0
0
0
5 Nov 1991 Claims List F'aoe
Tue 9:27 AM City of Mendota Heiohts
1
2
3
ernp eck Number I
Ternn.a
1
2
4
6
eck•
Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
iG
7
8
9
P e 1 1 1 1 e r o it OY = 1 ,,-0201-20 Nr4-81.-Thw 120700
--
27 120.00
-
10
11
12
Iata.Ls lerno Lheck Number c/
Tern Check Number 28
13
14
15
` 28 Dodd Technical Corp 01-4330-490-10 mtcn contract 240.00
--
17
18
19
20
16
17
18
.-40..' i0..
Totals Temp Check Number 28
21
22
23
24
19
20
121
ern - • 1 . - `
-
29 Fieldstone Cabinentry Inc 01-4131-020-20 Nov Re Garlock 78.00
25
26
27
28
22
23
24
29 78.00
Totals Ternn Check Number 29
29
30
31
32
25
26
27
Ternn Check Number 30
33
34
35
36
37
38
39'
4
26
29
30
.:,0 Factory Mutual tenor tits -4400-15 91 nuf 1€c—forrn 40. 00
--
30 40.00
31
32
33
I otais I eep Lheck—Ntum-Uer ._.
-
21,
Temp Check Number 31 > • .> _ -
411
42
431
44
34
35
36
31 Fire Enor 01-4400-150-30 renewal 21.95
--
31
45
46
1
47
48
37
38
._1.95
" Totals Temp Check Number _ 31' -
x
Terno
49
60
11
40
41
42
Check Number 32
32 Firestone Stores 01-4330-215-70 rprs 330.88
53
54
55'
56
43
44
45
-- - --T�- -
Oma 330. 88 '
° Totals Temp Check Number 32'60
57
58 j
S9'
46
47
48
Temp Check Number 33
61
62
63
64
50
51
_ -
33 ' ' Y ^. 664.31
66
66
67'
68
52
53
6a
Totals Ternn Check Number 33
Temp Check Number 34
69
70 (
72
56
i94 Firstt'Interstate" Bank, Trustee 01-2071 . " Nov prem ^ 196 76 . , ,
7a,7.9
0
0
0
0
0
7
Totals Ternp Check Number
38
YO`t. OD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
5 Nov 1991 Claims List
Tue 9:27 AM City c.f Mendota Heights
Pape 6
Prop - • • tSbr• 34
1
z
-
2
TTemp.34
4
I, eck
6
Number Vendor Narne Account Code
Comments
Amount
6
7
6
8
7
.91 arst-'Le--Ra-nk'Trustee'—r2r1=4eY3`- 20-e0
Nov- prem—
G7: 45
9
8
34 First Interstate 'Bank Trustee 01-4132-050-50
Nov prem
19.28
10
34 First Interstate Bank Trustee "01-4132-070-70
Nov prem
25.57
11
tz
10
---
73
11
136
311.07
14
12
Totals Temp Check Number 34
15
16
14
Temp Check Number"35
18
15
"
-tt-Met -
-
..
19
16
3J rest WeSLer>r Irvr a3 -----1-5-430-4-90-S0
sv3Vs'
---3580
z0
17
--
22
18
35
— —S'
35.80
23
24
19
uais Temp Check--, 14 ,ri,er
L "
25
20
26
21
Temp Check Number 36
127
28
22
29
23
36 I 0 S 01-4490-109-09
Oct rntcn
12.85
30
24
36 I 0 S 01-4330-490-10
---i+1-4268-08-5-85
Oct rntcn
81.65
31
Oct-mt-cn
30-45
33
33
25
. •
36 I O 5
26
'
36 I 0 S 01-4330-460-30
Oct rot cn
14.30
34
27
36 I O S 01-4330-445-40
Oct rntcn
12.85
35
36
28
101=400=080-80
Oct-mtrrr
29.4.0
37
29
36 I 0 S 05-4330-490-15
Oct rntcn
55.65
36
30
36 I 0 S 15-4330-490-60
Oct rntcn
20.25
39
40
31
36 I 0 S 0i•-4v31ZF-490-±•
--fax mt'cn
9-
7,x-50
41
32
36 I,0 S 05-4330-490-15 .
fax mtcn
99.50
42
33
36 1 0 S ,. - -01-44907129-09
-
."
Nov mtcn
_
- .12.85
� -
•
43
44
34
.3 : _ . . - : .
..
• v-mtcn
31. C5
as
35
46
36
432
523.50
47
48
37
Totals Ternp Check NulnLer - 36
^
'• ' :.
°
49
38
�',' . .. °
' ,
,
..
60
39
Temp Check Number; „."• 37'° .. ;.. -
-
..
..
' ;
-_. ,
-'
51
40
•53
41
37 I 0 S 01-4268-085-85
Nov rntcn
3.45
54
42
37 I 0 S 01-4330-460-30
-
Nov rntcn
14.30
65
56
44
s r
37 I 0 S . ,01-4300-080-80-
Nov rntcrl
29.00
'
578
45
37 1 0 S 05-4330-490-15
Nov rntcn
" - ..
55 65
- -
69
49
37 I O.5 J= -
Nuv urLLn
C0.2G
61
47
---
62
48
222
135.50
63
65
49
Totals Temp CheLk „Number 37
65
50
66
s1
Temp Check Number,., 38 , • ''
•
67
52
69
63
38 ICMA RT 01-2072
10/4 payroll
141.02
70
54
38 ICMA RT 01-4134-110-10
10/4 payroll
91.32 '
71
55
-
,S8 I •CMA RT. •,., .. 01-2072 -. .
'>
. ±011-8 pay -roil,-
1•dr 1. 0
is
56
38'1 C M A- R T<'''- " `�. - '01-4134-110-10
"`
- R,.
16/18 payroll
> 91.32
74
Totals Ternp Check Number
38
YO`t. OD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
5 Nov 1991 Claims List Pape 7
Tue 9:27 AM City of Mendota Heights
1
2
3
Temp Cneck Number .sy
..
Ternp. °
1
2
3
4
5
6
Lheck
Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount
. •
s
8
9
10
11
12
7
• 8
9
69 Haul Kaiser 01-4268-1Jle-30 Ott svc 1.661.410
-- • ,
- 39- 1, 56I.4Qr
10 totalsIemo Check Number 3'1
11
12 Temo Check Number 40
13
14
15
16
13
'14 . 40 Kat Keys 01-4305-030-30 lock 6.50 '
15 -- t ---- .. ,
._. ,..4� .. .. . - - - - - .. x _
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
---
16 6.Jli)
17 Totals Terno Check Number 40
18
19 I0rno , Lheck Number 41
20 h „ °
21x, •• 41 Kiwanis Club of W St Paul 01-4400-110-10 3rd 4th atr Lowell 203.00
25
26
ze
22 --
23 41 203.00
24 Totals Terno Check Number 41
29
30
31
32
25
26 Temp Check Number 42
27
•Lonvnerciat '1=
33
34
35
35
37
35
39
41
42
43
44
26 4: Knox Lredit .205-070c-/0 Milts (no tax) 81.34
29 42 Knox Commercial Credit 01-4305-070-70 solus 17.42
30 42 Knox Commercial Credit 01-4305-070-70 solys 31.71
-red
31 4Knox Lornrnerci a l C i t 5- 60n -Q1b'Qr='6Y5b1
1 T vs 14.79
32 ',. 42 Knox -Commercial Credit 09-4460-000-00 solys 89-6 F 46.68
33 S'42 Knox Commercial Credit ,. - ' 01-4305-070-70 - solys '49.15 15
._ .. ... - `'
34 ---
2
35 52 241.07
36 Totals Tema Check Number 42
45
46
47
a6
37 , .,
38 Temp Check Number,' 43'
49
50
52
63
5a
56
56
40 46 Knutson Rubbish Service erri=4-7=vrate5, Jan thru-S4)6"recyclinu E, 03.00'
41 43 Knutson Rubbish Service 08-4335-000-00 Oct svc 60.06
42 --
43 bb. . ., E. E83. t,6
44 •Totals"Temp Check ,Number - •'43 -. _
46 .e- •' < > � .,
57
59
591
60
46 I ernp Lheck Number 44
47
48 44 Thomas Knuth 72-4415-835-00 mi reimb 29.97
61
62,
64'
49 44 Inornas"Knutn ., w7 -4' -41w0-00 - rni reimb 36.30.
50 44 Thomas Knuth ' 33-4415-841-00 '''mi reimb , 28.60 •
`
61 44 Thomas Knuth: ,70-4415-871-00 mi reimb -' '48.68
'Knuth
65
66
67�
6a
52 44 thornas 76-4415-833-60 mi reimb L7:
53 44 Thomas Knuth 05-4415-105-15 rni reimb 4.68
54 44 Thomas Knuth 05-4415-105-15 Nov allow 10.00
69
70
71(
73
55 ---" --- - „
ss ... - ' 308::.. ' ..
�7 Totals Temp Check Number 44 185.4576(
�a
7§
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
5 Nov 1991
Tue 9:27 AM
Claims List
City of Mendota Heights
Rape 8
rki
I ernp Lheck Numb' 45 .
S7
'Temp.' 31
a
`Che'
4 tit , b
Number Vendor Name Account Cade Comments Amount 6 i
Ib
6
I7 45 Krec7i 0fftc llachrires 011 4200 110-tQ spivs 55-90 9'
I
6 10j
45 ,. I 55.90 11!
:o
i otaT8-Terns Lhecfi`Nurnber 45 1a ,3,1
11 • 1
2r.Ternp Check Number ' 46 isi
17
14 ' 46 L E L S 01-2075 Nov dues .. • 250.00 s 18
11516
4b 2JQt: 00 211
t7 Totals Temp Check Number 46 22
23.
18 24
19,---T r l.J CI fec .' Nur ttr , --47 25
20 . 26
21 ' , 47 Guy Kullander . 08-4335-000-00 - exp reirnb 25.46 " 27
2 47'Gay-'Kcr11andsr 09=4'4'12 00-00 exp-rei-mb 08:43 9
I23 47 Guy Kullander 16-4460-000-00 exp reirnb 19.53 30
24 47 Guy Kullander 01-4415-085-85 exp reirnb 4.95 31'
.12
IT 479uy-KTr anter• 01-4d68-0550 . exp-reimb LC. 55 33
!;,6 47 Guy Kullander 05-4415-105-15 exp reirnb 7.70 34.
I27 ._47 Guy Kullander = 64-4415-869-00 - exp reirnb 6.05 35'
3637
26
128 329 154.67 38
30 Totals Temp Check Number 47 39
40
3141
3.2. "" Ternp Check Number ` 48 42
44
:48 °hilt
34 Leaglae aP Cities 01-c074 Nuv prem 544
45
35 48 League of MN Cities 01-4131-020-20 Nov prem 813.27 46
36 47
46
.. > . 1, 358.11
37' 9649
36 - "Totals Temp., Check Number `.. , 48 - .: `• . •. - > 50
39 ,. .. .. ° . .. , .. . e 51
M 52
4o Temp" Chec1 Number 49 53
41 54
42 49 M Thomas Lawe11 01-4415-110-10 Nov allow 175.00 55
56
4.3 57
44 "49 •' ` 175.00 56
45 Totals Temp 'Check .Number •� 49 •. . ..' b" 59
- . _ .. . ., 60
46 61
47 Temp Check Number ` 50 62
63
48 64
49 .-w.50 LeeF Bros ._ _ 011-433:,-310-30 _ .,., 01_1.- sv1_ ,,,zg,, 9.96 65
50 50s Leef Bros • a` ,° 01-4335-310-701 Oct svc -4 9.96 • n. 66
50 ,Leef Bros •
b1 - v 15=4335-310-60 : OctDet svc . 9:96 67
62 ---
69
53 150 . 29.88 70
64 Totals Temp Check Number 50 71
72
66 . . 73
,•-,;,Temp ;.Ternp Check Number 5.1 ..' ., r - ` -r �> _ 74
a , 76
` • ., - _ _ • 7g
'e- - - ' .
0
0
0
0
;1
t )
0
0
0
5 Nov 1991 Claims List Pape 9 `
Tue 9:27 AM City of Mendota Heiohts
1
2
3
emp eck Nurnber 51
°
Ternp. •
1
2
3
a
5
6
eC.k
Nurnber Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount
5
6
7
8
8
9
bi -0tii.
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 51
9
10
11
12
10
11
12
Terno heck Nurnber b2
52 Med Centers H P 01-4131-050-50 Nov prem 1,161.45
-
13
13
14
15
16
,3
14
16
, J - • - - r -2074 Nov prem 1,'588.80
52 Med Centers H P 01-4131-110-10 Nov orern 1,244.80
52 Med Centers H P 01-4131-020-20 Nov prem 2,750.35
17
18
so
16
17
18
J....'e• er1 ers - 01-4101-044-40C Nov prem 500.00
52 Med Centers H P 01-4131-070-70 Nov prem 205.75
52 Med Centers H P 05-4131-105-15 Nov orern 872.40
21
22
23
24
19
20
21
J e. --1 ors H P 0811-0=0001=00 Nov -prem 122.40
52 Med Centers H P ' 15-4131-060-60 Nov prem 455.80
--- •
...- -
25
26
27
28
22
23
24
468 8.9w ./5-
Totals Temp Check Nurnber 52
29
30
31
32
2s
.2G
27
Fernp Check NurntSL51, 5,6 - — -
-
53 Mendota Heiohts Rubbish 01-4267-085-85 Aug Sept recycling 4,357.00
33
34
35
36
28
29
30
--
53 4.357.00
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 53
37
35
38
40
31
32
Ternp Check Number 54
< .. •. ' n .. „ .< •-
41
42
43
44
34
35
36
b4 Mendota• Heiohts Landscape 01-4bW141-0/w-lW tree removal 475.00
--
54 475.00
45
46
47
48
37
38
39
totals Temp .Check N,irnber 54 49
49
. .. . «- 50
..>� Tema Check Nurnber . 55 ... - .. - _ • .. . ' " - .` < 62
40
41
42
53
55 Metro Waste Control 15-4449-060-60 Nov Svc 38, 845. 08 54i
55 Metro Waste Control 17-3575 Nov svc . 2,796.08cr 66
66
43
44
45
--- .. . ° 67
110 36, .049.00 . - 58
- ` Totals Ternp`Check Nurnber 55 59
60
46
47
48
8
Ternp Check Nurnber 56 62
63I
64
49
50
51
bb Mlowest business 1-'rodue'cs 0a -4300 -1W -1•>r salt's 44...J8 65
: 56 Midwest Business Products`. 01-4300-030-30 ' • splys 28.42 661
-_ 56 Midwest Business Products ' 01-4300-020-20 w ° - solys- 14.21 fi7
52
63
54
56 Midwest Ecusiness Products 01-46te=-w 0-50 splys 28.42 69
56 Midwest Business Products 05-4300-105-15 solys 42.63 70
56 Midwest Business Products 01-4300-110-10 splys 48.15 71�
66
56
56 Midwest business Products,- 01-4300-110-10 5p1ys - , 4.75 is
° . -- °.- A < - 74
392 211.20 75
�.t c < dr.,.-, Ar.. -.L kh'TPxty.•.an 4G - 29
8
0
0
0
0
3
5 Nov 1991 Claims List Pane 10
Tue 9:27 AM City of Mendota Heights
2
3
ernp -c• • .- . 7 - - 1
_ '• •> ^ - , , ¢ ._. 2
Temp.- 3
4
6
l:heck 5
Nurnber Vendor Narne Account Code Comments Amount 6
7
7
8
9
.J '!` -• - - t=4.00-61`0 2--Sept0 svc Jri -- 9
57 -Minn Cellular Tele .Co 01-4200-610-20 Sept svc 19.93 to
57 Minn Cellular Tele Co 01-4200-610-30 ' Sept svc - 10.98 11
-.2,5
10
11
12
i rlrl e u ar l e Co r1 -i 00=610-._.0 Sept svc--
57 Minn Cellular Tele Co 01-4200-610-30 Sept svc 6.10 14
57 Minn Cellular..Tele Co 01-4200-610-10 Sept svc 6.50 15
1C
13
14
15
--- ". - - 17
. . 342 ' ` , - .. 62.03 18
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber - ,57• 19
70
16
17
18
21
Ternp Check Nurnber 58 22
23
19
�21
..58 Minnes'ot=airrve—Inc01--4-305-@-z--7C 5piys
25
26
58 • 52. 2@ 27
28
22
23
24
cl l •_a 1 ellfp CI 1tir 'J1lTntref 58 29
30
Ternp Check Number 59 31
32
25
76
27
33
59 MirnnPDept of Revenue , 01-4320-050-50 Seat fuel tax 12.00 34
.59 Minn Dept of Revenue 01-4320-050-50 fuel tax license 25.00 36
2a
29
30
---
37
118 37.00 35
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 59
39 40
32
33
.
• Ternp Check Number. 60 • ., 42
..t.. ,. .G". < .. - .< ... ,.<. 43
as
3d
35
36
60 Minn Nutu l Life Iris Q�1-a-07� —=1-0-18--payrcril
45
60 Miran Mutual Life Ins 01-2072 11/1 payroll 535.00 46
60 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-2074 Nov prern 201.42 47
48
-=m
37
38
39
< 60 !41 nr! Mul.ual Li f I rrs. NP __
1-740
49
, 60 Mutual", -Life Inc'. 01-4.131-020-20 .. " -.,Nov " prem _ 3.40:- ;` �: 50
60 ,Minn'i�rin- Mutual ; life Incn -01-4131-070-70 a ` Nov ,_prern ' - ^. �. 4Q! = '" - . <.. '- 51
.. 52
41
42
6Q+ Miran Mutual Life' Ins off-irrret-tit00-@0 Mov=prem 1-70
53
--- 54
420 1.246.62 66
56
43
44
a5
" 1 • ., - -.n . ." ,,. 57
s
' <t .. ..- , .. . .. . , 58
Ternp Check. Nurnber 61 6 ` " ' 59
.. .. - - 60
46
47
48
61
61 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-2074 Nov prern 192.79 62
61 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-4131-110-10 Nov prern 251.88 sa
4961
60
61
Minnesota Benefit Assn „ �3-4131-1nL J -1J NI prfir -+77. 76 66
- 61 Minnesota' Benefit . Assn , 01-4131=020-20 •- Nov prern •.' 691.29', 66
. 61.,Minnesota Benefit 01-4131-050-50 - �' Nov^prem " ' r 235.32 67
68
Nav
62
53
64
61 Mtnnesuta Benefit Assn 01-4131-070-70 pr .340.73
69
61 Minnesota Benefit Assn 15-4131-060-60 Nov prern 112.40 70
--- 71
55
56
7
4E7 - C, L1 -Q1. 44 73
- 'Totals Temp.Check Number 61 , , ". 74
,. 76
6C-
0
QC -
0
C.
0
0
0
C)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
'0
0
O
0
`r
5 Nov 1991
Tue 9:27 AM
Claims List
City of Mendota Heiohts
Pane
11
-
1
2
3
5
1
2
3
•'
Terno Check Nurnber 62
. Terno. •
4
Lheck
5
6
Nurnber Vendor Name
Account Code
Comments
Amount
6
6
7
8
bd Minnesota Toro Inc
01-430-490-70
parts
105746
9
6
--
-
-
10
9
62
—NuTh5
105.46
11
,0
r13
Totals Terno l eh c
(7..-
13
11
14
12
Terno Check Nurnber 63
15
16
13
17
14
63 Motor Parts Service
01-4330-490-50
parts
9.52 •
18
15
— — ",
-...
.,
----
19
20
78
b.6
3. JG
21
77
Totals Temp Check Nurnber
63
22
23
18
24
9
r e4
25
20
26
21
64 Motorola
01-4630-030-30
radios
2.502.00
27
ze
22
--
29
,23
64
2.502.00
30
24
Totals Temp Check Nurnber
64
31
32
25
33
;26
Terno Check Nurnber 65
34
27
y '
35
158.60
36
37
25
E,P Natl [-ire P`rcTtection
Ta-4..r7c7O- .,-i`r r—
91 codes
25
--
38
30
65
158.60
39
4
31
-
totals Temp crmrirN'umbw
—6:, -
471
32
-
Z1
42
33
Ternp Check Number 66..
43
44
34
45
35
66 Newsweek
01-4402-110-10
renewal
43.68
46
36
--
47
48
37
bb ..
- - ..
43.68
-
49
36
Totals Temp "Check Nurnber ,
66 .,
"
�•
y
50
39
"
- w�
a
.•
..
...
51
53
40
I ernp Lheck Nurnber b/
53
41
64
42
67 Nardini Fire Eq
01-4305-030-30
splvs
124.00
55
56
43
--
----
57
44
67
p
124.00
58
45
"
"Totals Temp Check Number
67
59
60
46
61
47
Temp Check Nurnber 68
62
48
63
64
066
r >,
5
68
30.00
66
67
69
52
totals Temp Cneck NuMt f"
68
69
53
70
64
Terno Check Nurnber 69
71
72
bb
z
..
73
56
69 Northern` State Power
- 01-4211-300-50
OCt ,svc
384.-57-
. .'
74
0
0
0
0
0
0
'0
0
O
0
`r
5 Nov 1991 Claims List Pane 12
Tue 9:27 AM City of Mendota Heights
ernp - • - 69 1
2
Temp. 3
4
6
ec 5
Number Vendor Name Account Code Ccrrnrnernts Amount 6
7
a
7
- r - ewer 0]=4`11-33.5=312— —Nov--svc— r.. c o
,69 Northern State'Power 15-4211-400-60 Nov svc 22.47 10
12
10
11
12
c07 65:4G 13
Totals Temp Check Number 69 14
15
6
13
14
15
Teiiu Cheek Nutrdrer , 7221-- 17
... - , 18
70 Nc,vack Enterprises 01-4330-215-70 - solys - 74.85 19
16
17
18
-- zi
70 74.85 22
Totals Temp Check Number 70 23
24
1925
20
21
- Temp Check Number , ;, 71 26
_ .. ' 27
26
22
23
24
71 0d1tcr""KtsYrie1's 1=4221=•800=90--- Oct svc750 29
71 Oakcrest Kennels 01-4225-800-90 Oct svc 156.00 30
--- 31
32
25
26
27
142 ., 331.00 33
Totals Tern Check Number 71 34
- 35
- 5
26
29
30
k Nun 1,--- ---72---
37
38
72 Oxygen Service Co 01-4305-030-30 svc thru 9/15 13.50 39
40
31
32
1 et- 08-43'35•-000-00 -'svc-thru i -01i-5 13.50
'72 OxygenServiceCo 01=4305-030-30 svc thru 10/15 13.50 .
~alb .4e1
141
42
43
ad
34
35
36
-5e
Totals Temp Check Number 72
45
46
47
48
37
39
,Temp Check NumLrer s 73
73 'Leonard Perron 01-4268-500-30 snow „olcwino fir? dent `" r'1 645.00 '
'. . ' ,3GE+.L70
•ciL.y
50
51
52
40
41
42
73 Lecrnarc! Perrurr 08-4335-00000 srrvwp1L,wi�ru hall
146 1,005.00
63
54
56
56
43
5
Totals Temp Cheek Number-; 73
Temp Check • Number ' - 74
59
60
46
47
48
74 Plaza Tire & Svc 01-4330-440-20 tires 2243 129.84
74 Plaza Tire & Svc 01-4330-440-20 tires 2244 129.84
61
62
63
64
60
61
74 Plaza Tire & Svc 01--4330-440-E tires 2:43 1-29.84
:�' 74, Plaza +Tire &" Svc 01•=4330-440-20 .>. -tires 22245 . 271.36
. ,.. ` . < " . ... •- "
66
8687
62
63
64
X36 GG81. ciLS
Totals Terno Check Number 74
69
70
71
72
66
56
�7
, Temp-CtISLI Number 75 < •. - , .. ..
.g 75 Pub1ic Empl Ret Assn - 01-2074 'Nov, orern • .. " 24.00 . • ,7s
'
73
4
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
(7
0
0
5 Nov 1991 Claims List Pape 13
Tue 9:27 AM City of Mendota Heiohts
1
2
3
- erno• ec 'urn.e - v - - • - 1
- , 2
. .Ternp• ,. .- 3
6
6
eck 6
Number Vendor Narne Account Code Comments Amount 6
7
8
7 ,/b Pubic 1=rnp1 Het Assn 0i-4161-11-Q7=Te Nov svc j. Q11 9
150 _ 33.00 11
^ - - 13
10 fotals lemo Check Number /v 13
11 14
12 Terno Check Number 76 15
16
14 76 Quill Coro 01-4300-040-40 solys 24.61'. '18
16= 76 Quill Coro 05-4300-105-15 solys 34.93 20
-
16 /b W.ui11 LorD 1t11-43010-1Gbo-thi1 solys 31.69 21
17 76 Quill Coro 15-4300-060-60 splvs 89.11 22
76 Quill Corp 01-4300-110-10 solys 1.070.28 23
1824
19 --- • - - - 25
20 380 1,250.62 26
Totals Ternp Check Number 76 27
28
22 29
23 Terno Check Number 77 30
'24 31
32
25 7, Road Rescue - „ 5-1130-3111-credi-1. 5070 33
26 77 Road Rescue 01-4305-030-30 splys 280.05 34
27 77 Road Rescue 01-4305-030-30 solys 399.20 35
-1b-4bd10=060-
26 // Noad Rescue i0 tri 5-40712* 371
29 --- 38
30 308 1.169.25 • 39
4
O
31 fotals Temp Check—N 8I Ur 77 411
32 - ,' 1 42
33 = Ternp Check Number . 78 - 43
34 45
35 78 Reliable 01-4300-020-20 solys 156.75 46
--47
36
48
37 78 _ 1:,6.7J 49
38 ti. Totals Ternp,-Check".Number 78. < - so
38 " - 51
.., .. - - 53
40 Ism) Lheck Number r'y 53
41 54
42 79 Rose P'lurnbino 16-4460-000-00 Re 1305 1306 Kendon 1,850.00 65
56
43 -- • - .. _ 57
44 79 1.850.00 58
59
45 ";w� Totals .Temp Check Number 7959
60
46 61
47 Terno Check Number 80 62
46 63
64
49 1:10 Robotrorrics 1r1 -430..1-0.30-3m - 1,,ry E .o@1 65
50 - , ' -- 66
61 ' 80 20.00 67
68
62 Totals Ternp Check Number 80 • 69
53 70
64 Ternp Check Number 81 , 71
72
65". ,., - 73
66 81 Roadway Rubbish 01=4267-085-85 Jan thru Sept recycling, 1,056.00 "" ' - ..." 74
7 76
Totals Ternp Check Number
81
0
0
0
0
0
n
1)
0
0
`.}
5 Nov 1991 Claims List Page 14
Tue 9:27 AM• City of Mendota Heights
beck -Number------ •82
•
Temp.3
1
2
4
4
6
6
Number Vender Narne Account Code Comments Amount
5
6
7
6
7
g10
OL Ru fr idne-Johnson Eq Co 01 4330 490-50- --•------•rors —30 .0
--
82 30.30
9
11
1:
10
11
2
Tu6c1 , Tr'iuj3 •Eheck-Number 8C
Temp Check Number 83
13
14
15
16
13
14
1b
'
- 83 9 & T Office Products 01-4300-020-20 solys • 3.19
835 & T Office products . 01-4300-020-20 splys 13.42
-Off -ire
17
18
19
2c
��
8
1=-�Fiee-Produets
C 3 8r -1
-Products -414 4300 020 20 -s o Lys —35.55
83 S & T Office Products 01-4300-030-30 splys 24.95
83 S & T Office products 01-4300-030-30 solys 23.85
01-4300 030 30
22
23
24
1zs
20
21
-splys -7-9.2-8
--
498 180.74
25
27
28
I22
'23
24
-al Temp -Check -Number 8C
Temp Check Number 84
29
36
31
32
125
26
127
84 Mike Schaefers 011orn Pool 01-4330-440-20 rocs 69.95
- --
33
34
35
35,
26
29
30
4 --69.96
Totals Temp Check Number 84
37
38
38
40
31amber-
32
33
—85
-
85 Schumachers Inc. 08-4335-000-00 - solys , 100.40,
41
42
43
34
3s
36
85 100.40
Totals Ternp Check Number 85
45
46
47
48
37
38
39
• .. -
Ternp.'Check Number ` ,,86
-•, > .. • ,. .. H
r ° `�7° `
4
50
51
52
a0
40
41
42
`- ., Si:,1'ys 11.97
_ _
86 44.97
T 15 Tel Cl OG
53
54
55
56
a3
45
j lip reckt-Nttmber „
<.' Temp, Check Number - • - , 87 ..
. .. .. - ., _
57
59
60
46
47
48
87 Shamrock Cleaners 01-4410-020-20 Sept clno 35.98
--
87
61
62
63
64
49
so
51
- 3v'ra8
Totals Temp Check Number 87 °
- TCusF; CireLk Nunber .-. .> 8S. ..®. .. -- .. , " .. ,. _• .. ...
66
66,
67
68
62
53
54
88 L E Shaughnessy Jr 01-4220-132-10 Oct svc 1,585.05
es-422,e74--32—IsGet
9
70
71
ss
56
.. .vc 161.35 ,
b>. ' 88 L E Shaughnessy Jr , ~' .. ,-,15-4220-132-60 .. ,Oct svc,258. 15. . :" _
i3
74
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
J
0
0
O
0
5 Nov 1991 Claims List Pape 15
Tue 9:27 RM City c.f Mendota Heights
2
3
Ct'sFL-Nurnt.kr 88
Ternp.
- -
—Ci
,
2
3
4
4
6
L5-Ck
Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount
5
6
7
8
8
-8-L E-Shmuut-Cressy-Jr 03-4220-1-32-00 - OCL 5v— 1-45:20
88 L E Shaughnessy•Jr 21-4220-132-00 'Oct sv 193.60 ,
88 L E Shaughnessy Jr 14-4220-132-00 Oct svc 1,330.95
.1-6=4220=-1-32=00
9
10
77
10
11
12
- E bhaughrlessy Jr f�c�sva 308.95
88 L E Shaughnessy Jr 01-4301-110-10 exo reirnb 95.85
---
13
14
15
13
14
i6
704 4: 1-29.,10
Totals Ternp Check Number 88
- - - -
17
18
19
20
16 -r 89
17
78 89 Spectrum Como & Printer Ror 01-4300-110-10 sol -vs 75.00
21
22
23
24
19
X201 89 • 75.00
21 Totals Ternp Check Number 89
1---L
25
26
27
26
23, Temp Check Number 90
24
29
30
31
32
- 9O-Southvtew--Desiun -- ---- — 01-45;35-31-5-30— -----_-- -9/27-svc GS 0e
2C -- •
27 90 65.00
33
34
35
36
Trite—i�•.5 1 ETRD •Che'Ck—'NLTrnber �•`90
26
29
30 Ternp Check Number 91
37
38
39
40
31
f32 91 St Paul Companies 01-3300 refund rot 912518 5.00
33 -- ., .. a .. ---- ,
41
42
43
44
34 ` 5
35 Totals Ternp Check Number 91
36
Tip--Ehir 72
45
46
47
as
37 ec-Ncrmber
X 49
38 „," 92 nSt Paul Dispatch 0
39 " h PPS ' " 01-4240-050-50 ' - public works ad .. 116.:00 - 5
52
--
40
41 92 116.00 54
42 Totals Ternp Check Number 92 55
56
43 57
44 Temp Check Number •93 58
.. .," 59
45 • .. 60
;3
as tamp Works 01-43e�O-110-10 sulvs :.r9 61
47 -- 62
48 93 59.09 63
64
Tul,tls Trmp -Number
a9 Ct+> Lk 93 -
65
50 .• .. 66
61 ‘Ternp Check Number 94 - ` . 67
68
62 69
63 94 State Treasurer 01-3315 • 3rd qtr s/chos 2,485.00 70
54 94 State Treasurer 15-3315 3rdqtrs/chns28.00 71{
72
74 Tr
55 JI.tLC tsar CI 03 .615 ,3rd —yiei -71.11rg' 73
7 282 .. x ^' 2, 412. 50 ^... .t 76
A 29
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
r)
0
!
5 Nov 1991 Claims List Pace 16
Tue 9:27 AM City of Mendota Heights
22
mp-5111.. k-Namber 95
1
Temp.- 3
a
Iheck
8
6
5
Nurnber Vendor Name Account Cade Comments Amount 6
7
6
7
8
9
9..r SLeri'inu Electric -0i 42H-300 50 splys 22:22 y
10
., 95 22.22 71
12
--'Fatal-s-Tenttscherfi
10
11
12
Number- 95
13
14
Temp Check Nurnber 96 15
16
13_
'14
15
- - 17
96 Sun Newspapers 01-4240-050-50 public works ad 221.20 18
96 Sun Newspapers 01-4240-110-10 He bond sale 32.24 19
zo
16
77
8
,9
1 e 0-1 4240r -1'i -0--l-0 Re ord- 280 40.92
21
96 Sun Newspapers 01-4240-110-10 He bond sale 32.24 22
96 Sun Newspapers 01-4240-110-10 Re bond sale 36.58 23
Newspapers 24
20
21
un -Newspapers 01-4240 080 80 --"--Re vac -utility- 1
ity- 4,8
25
" 26
576, 378.06 27
25
22
,23
24
Tu 1 s-1.etno-Check- Number -96
29
30
Terno Check Nurnber 97 31
32
25 33
,,(.i 97 Terminal Sply Co 15-4305-060-60 solys 23.78 34
27 --35
36
26 77 -23v 7-8-
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 97 38
29 38
30 39
T-emp-EYreck-Number 98 4o
31 41
3242
33 _ :98 Triangle -Rubbish ^ 0174267-085-85 Jan thru June recycling 750.00 .. 43
44
34 45
3s 98 750.00 46
36 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 98 47
48
38 Temp, Check Number' 99 . , , _ a 49
39. d .. _ . . .. ,.. ,. .. 51
52
99 Trauy /Tr'iu,i Fuel ' 0c1 --•1'2i-0 '
40 di-esal 1. 78 -88
53
41 99 Tracy /Tripp Fuel 01-1210 rep/no lead 3,337.25 54.
42 --- 55
56
'i
43198 " ,916.13
57
44 'Totals Term; Check Nurnber 99 • 68
45,, .. - ^ •, . ^ 59
T-emy, `Creak Number ' r00 fio
61
47 62
48 100 Tripp Oil 16-4460-000-00 1306 Kendon 82.00 63
64
Tr i
49 100 NN Di 1 16-44G0 000-00. 1305-Kendon, 822.-00
65
50 ' --- . .> 66
61 41.00 8 164.00 , 67
T��Lc11s Temp Check N,. 68
100
1
52 69
53 70. '
64 Temp Check Nurnber 101 71
72
56 >. -
56 101 T S- I°= 01-4330-490-10 .' .;.. :'rprs ' .. ^ 105.65 " 7a,
..
101 ^- > >rh¢ rC74
Totals Temp Check Nurnber -
101
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
5 Nov 1991 Claims List Page 17
Tue 9:27 AM City of Mendota Heiohts
1
2
3
F toe
Ternp. . -
Cht'Ck
1
2
3
a
4
5
Nurnber Vendor Narne Account Code Comments Amount
6
6
7
8
9
r 2 -TU °'f-Prrob uct s 01---4205-050-50 splys 1-04. ..1
• ---
102 104.15
9
10
11
10
11
12
ot"'aIs Terno Ch-erk'"Numb'et t02
Ternp Check Nurnber 103
12
13
14
15
16
13
14
15
' - - - -
103 U S West Cornrnunications 01-4210-020-20 Oct svc 477.91
103 U S West Communications 15-4210-060-60 Oct svc 410.00 -
rJ -
17
18
19
20
• "- Comm cations or 4aro=o5Q—Jo ch.. SVC' 6.3. 915
16
n 103 U S West Communications 01-4210-070-70 Oct sv 63.94
18 103 U S West Cc=rnrnunications 01-4210-110-10 Oct svc 287.66
'03-UWest-Cor
21
22
23
24
19 irtm-i-G`at ionb 01-421-0 040-40 ct svc Ja..7-70
20 103 U S West Communications 05-4210-105-15 Oct svc ^ 157.22 '
21 103 U S West Communications 01-4210-030-30 Nov svc 110.56
'
25
26
27
2
r3 -U Wet-
s -Ccrmnuni cations errs -09=#460=000 00 Nov s
-svc 48.29
22 ___
23!
124 927 1.672.23
Total Temp -Check -Number-- - -- -1-03—
2 99
30
31
32
29
.0
L7
Terno Check Number 104
'
33
34
35
36
26
29 104 Uniforms Unlimited 01-4410-030-30 splys 74.05
30 104 Uniforms Unlimited 01-4410-020-20 splys Currie 75.15
37
38
39
31 1-04 tinif rrns-Un3-imited------01-4#i+Z-020-'20 splys Reyes 1:04
32 --- - •3
33 312 - . 460. 24'
40
42
as
34 Totals T4Nurrtbet� 1-04
35
36 Temp Check Nurnber 105
as
46.
a7'
48
37 49
n..,. `.- 105 United Way St Paul - - 01-2070 •. _ Nov ccmtr 196.00 sod
'— .. _--
39 " 51
•. `�
52
0J .. ..1-96-.:-00
40
63
41 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 105 54
42 55�
1-06 56
43 .. x - 57
58
s9`
45 . - 106 University of Minn; 01-4400-040-40 Bldg official institute 210.0060
46 - - 61
47 106 210.00 62
a6 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 106 63
64
49 65
50 ,Temp Check Number - 107 66.
•.. 67l
. ,. .. •° -
r . - r - ..
- , - r r .68
...
• .. .. - 69
52
63 107 Vision Energy 01-4305-050-50 splys 46.90 70
71{
54 107 Vision Eneroy 01-4305-050-50 splys 22.9572
107 Vision Energy
ss ` 01 4`3 5 050-50 --1715- 2 -45 73
56 .. .. ., u .. .. ... 74•
si7 _ 428 - :.. v 116.25 75 ..
Totals- TNrm= rin-.. Nu,n1=,-r 1017 - 7'
0
0
0
0
J
0
)
•
1
3,-
5 Nov 1991 Claims List Paoe 18
Tue 9:27 AM City of Mendota Heiohts
1
2
3
, Terror Chck-Ntrm r 08 ,
, • ,2
,Ternp. ' .
3
4
4
5
6
eck
Nurnber Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount
6
6
7
9
8-Wal-dor-Plifflp 15-4330-490-60 rprs 1 s 17-44-6:50 ,
' ---
. ,
108 ",. _ , 1.416.50 ,
a
10
11
io
11
12
Tals T-eirre-Check-Number -108
Terno Check Nurnber 109
12
13
14
la
16
13
, ,
, 109 Wall Street Journal 01-4402-110-10 renewal 139.00„
,_ - , _
,
17
185
20
16
17
18
109 -1-39.-00
Totals Temp Check Nurnber 109
-erap-C-h-eck-Nurnber 1-10
21
22
23
24
i,
21
. .
110 West Weld 01-4305-050-50 solys 65.00 27
22 11-0-West-Weid--- -4305-050-50---'-----01solys 24:88 .26
23 ---29
3C
24 220 89.88 31
25' TLl erne -Check -Number- 110 ;32
23
26 34
27 TeraF3 Check Nurnber 111 3.5
361
28
29 111 Western Life Ins 01-4132-031-30 Nov prem 146.20
30 ---
37
38
39.
4C
31
32'„
33
111 -146.-20
-. ' Tot a 1 s Temp Check Nurnber 111 , - Is.
- ' „ f i ' • _MANUAL CHECKS: -, . ' , - , ' , - ' '-''
,-, „ - - -' ” -
41
42
43
”
34
35
36
13327 137930.02--DakoffCbuntgBalc —1014 w/hr----.---
13328 3,178.53 Commissioner of Revenue 10/4 SIT
14862 13329194, 194.33
2.00 State of Minnesota plate sticker 404
Errand -a
45
46
47
.la
37
39
- ,, 13332 ., 1370D-TNo Star Chapter-XCB0 -10/18 rft-g
, , .,, „ ,. ; .,: ,, „ . 13333' -: • •, 159.61', U. S. West Park pay, phone , .,. . ,,... ., - . - '
':-:.?„ = , „ ' 13334 •,. - ' . . ', Sept svc '-' ' . „
^16.00 Connect INc .•
.
49
50
51
52
40
41
42
13335 9.00 No. Dakota ChCommerce Oet-iiitg Sm.ah
'13336 2,500.00 U. S. Post Office meter refill
13337 1,764.03 NSP Oct svc
53
54
55
56
43,
45
, . . ,, 13338 ' 230.0 105 July svc ,', i.
,
„
' 13339 .. 7,995.81 PERA „ 10/4 payroll „ . - , ,,
„ , . „ . - ,
13340, ...-3,809.63 State Cap.ito/ C. U. ' 10/18 payeoll deductions ' ''” ,,, , ' , •
57
58 ,
59
60
46
47
48
13341' ' 400.00 -Dakota County Bank 0 61
13342 . 14,071.76 0 16/18 w/h -
'13343 3,214.07 Commissioner of REV 10/18 sit 641
49
50
51'
„ '.: . . ' k 3344„ -12,599.88 PayrOli-a7c --10/18 net payroll ' •65
.'t• , , ,..„
.,‘ ' - , '' - -• rr ': " 13345 4: , ':' -14.95 Minn Book Store' : ' . ' •code•book ,, , • - ", „ • - „ • ,66
, ,, ' '• -- 67 .
. ", ,,, - , ' '',./3.346.' ' -,,t!'",^ 415:21, Dakota Countg•Baak. " - repleniskpatty‘cash; , ".,' ' '.• 'z ' - ,'" , : •
68
52
63
'13347 - 300.00 Dakota County Court warrant 69
'13348 104.75 St. Paul Heart Clinic Re: Weisenburger 70
'
64
71
94,734.25 , 72
56
, _ , . 73
-, + ,,, „ - ' .
G.T.' ". . 288,928:58 . - . " . ,.. ..„
, , .. , ,
• • 4 , , - , , .: , .
J
0
0
0
0
0 _
0
0
(-)
0
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis
FROM: James E. Dani
Public Works
SUBJECT: Removal of S r uveillor Home
DISCUSSION:
October 31, 1991
The City recently acquired Mr. Jerry Schouveiller's home located
on Rogers Road. There were five homes located in this area that are
being acquired as part of the City',s Tax Increment Financing
(TIF) plan. The T.I.F. plan is to, upon each homeowner's re-
quest, acquire and clear the area of all the homes and redevelop
it as commercial.
We are currently taking bids to move the Shouveiller home from
the site, we would like to have the home gone before winter. Bids
will be opened on Monday and the results will be available for Council
consideration Tuesday evening.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Bids will be available Tuesday night with the add-on agenda.
JED:dfw
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November 5, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Guy Kullander, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Sale of Schouveiller Homestead at 2458 Highway 55
HISTORY
At the February 19, 1991, City Council meeting, the purchase,
with Tax Increment Funds, of Mr. Jerry Schouveiller's homestead was
approved. At a subsequent Council meeting, staff was directed to
seek bids to sell and remove the house from the site.
Invitations to bid were sent to ten house movers listed in the
directory yellow pages. Two bids were received:
1. Kenneth Ernst of Ernst Machinery &
House Movers Corporation - $7,600.00
2. William Otting of Otting House Movers - $5,200.00
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend the Council accept the high bid from Machinery &
House Movers Corporation to purchase the house located at 2458
Highway 55.
ACTION REOUIRED
If Council concurs with the recommendation, Council should
award the high bid from Machinery & House Movers Corporation to
purchase the house located at 2458 Highway 55 and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached agreement on behalf of
the City.
GDK:kkb
0 f
11/04/91 13:34 FAX 612 425 1017 BROMEN'S LUGGAGE 444 MENDOTA HEIGHTS 0004
City of _
Mendota Heights
BIDDING INSTRUCTIONS AND BID FORM
•
City of Mendota Heights will receive sealed bids for the purchase of a
single family home until 4:00 P.M., Monday, November 4, 1991. Awaid will '
be based on the highest. bid (after adjustments for exceptions). The
structure for sale is located at 2458 Highway 55 in Mendota Heights.
Once this house is purchased the new owner must complete all of .the
following within- 90 days of the purchase date as part of the purchase:
•
1. Execute the. attached Agreement. •• •
2. . Remove all structures includingbuilding, fence,..and garage from
the site. • • ..
3. Make exposed basement or cellar safe by .filling.
4. Cleanall construction debris from the site.
Before Commencing with any work on the site, the new owner shall
provide a $1,000 cash escrow to the City. This escrow *shall be forfeited
if the owner fails to perform the requirements as stated above with in • the
90 day completion period. If the work is not completed .within the.
specified period the owner. forfeits all rights to the structures on the •
property as well as the cash escrow, and the City shall resell or demolish
the structures.
Upon satisfactory Completion of all of the requirements the new owner
shall be refunded the cash escrow of $1,000.
The attached materials describe .the house and. its location. If you
wish to inspect the house contact ;Guy Rullander or Rlayton
•
• xt2D FORM (Please Print)
BID AmouNT: SEVEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED AND NO/100 S7,600.00).
EXCEPTIONS:
NONE
The
The above bid is a true and sincere bid, and it is my intent to carry
out all of the conditions as stated above, except the listed exceptions. . •
KENNETH C ERNST •
.: •
. •
, ERNST MACHINERY & HOUSEMOVERS'.
CORP.
Name '-
• •
;400 85TH AVER6EDWNEAFOLIS; MN 55445 612-425-2822
kddress
M2E/TIME: NOVEMBER 4, 1991
ANNEMENEMIIIIIMEN=MI
• . .
Phbne No.
11A1117;1-4+4-e.v.; *d"%vvemmo. ILX A"4- 4c• * X If 1 kt
0..o0 /Nib
EUICity of
A.1 AA Mendota Heights
BIDDING INSTRUCTIONS AND BID FORM
City of Mendota Heights will receive sealed bids for the purchase of a
single family home until 4:00 P.M., Monday, November 4, 1991. Award will
be based on the highest bid (after adjustments for exceptions). The
structure for sale is located at 2458 Highway 55 in Mendota Heights.
Once this house is purchased the new owner must complete all of the
following within 90 days of the purchase date as part of the purchase:
1. Execute the attached Agreement.
2. Remove all structures including building, fence, and garage from
the site.
3. Make exposed basement or cellar safe by filling.
4. Clean all construction debris from the site.
Before commencing with any work on the site, the new owner shall
provide a $1,000 cash escrow to the City. This escrow shall be forfeited
if the owner fails to perform the requirements as stated above within the
90 day completion period. If the work is not completed within the
specified period the owner forfeits all rights to the structures on the
property as well as the cash escrow, and the City shall resell or demolish
e structures.
Upon satisfactory completion of all of the requirements the new owner
shall be refunded the cash escrow of $1,000.
The attached materials describe the house and its location. If you
wish to inspect the house contact Guy Kullander or Klayton Eckles.
BID AMOUNT:
EXCEPTIONS:
BID FORM (Please Print)
The above bid is a true and sincere bid, and it is my intent to carry
out all of the conditions as stated above, except the listed exceptions.
//60) e, s- IAhab. I
.s-so.yy
Arldress
DATE/TIME• Oe. 7. 3 1/ / 9 9 /
6-v-,t1cg 179/
0 71 71 ; Alo &Se- A/er_s-
Name
4/61- 3.1d s'
Phone No.
1101 Victoria Curve • Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 452-1850
AGREEMENT
This Agreement made this day of , 19 by and
between ("Buyer") and the City of
Mendota Heights, a municipality existing under the laws of Minnesota ("Seller").
WHEREAS, Seller is the owner of certain real property located at
, Mendota Heights, Minnesota (the "Property"),
and the Improvement(S) thereon, including all buildings and structures used for
residential, garage, storage, decorative or privacy purposes (the "Improvements");
WHEREAS, Seller has received various bids to purchase the improvements, and after
due consideration has resolved to accept Buyer's bid; and
WHEREAS, Buyer and Seller mutually desire to enter Into an agreement stating the
terms, conditions and obligations of each party to the sale and purchase of the
Improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants contained herein and for other
good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows;
1. Seller acknowledges receipt of the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) cash
from Buyer, escrowed pending satisfactory completion='bf the obligations of Purchaser
under this Agreement (the "Escrow Amount").
2. Seller has this day sold to Buyer the Improvements for the sum of
Dollars ($ ) payable in full at
closing by certifled check.
3. Buyer agrees to purchase the Improvements "as is" and acknowledges that
Seller makes no representations or warranties of any nature whatsoever regarding the
Improvements, including without limitation, their condition and suitability for any
conceivable use. Buyer agrees to comply with Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 501 .(attached)
4. Subject to performance of this Agreement by Buyer, Seller agrees to execute
and deliver to Buyer a Bill of Sale conveying fee title to the Improvements.
5. Buyer shall have ninety (90) days following the date of closing within which to
complete the following at Buyer's sole expense and to Seller's sole satisfaction:
a) To remove the Improvements or cause the same to be removed from the
Property.
b) To make safe all hazardous remains on the Property by filling all exposed
basements and/or cellars and any other excavations with materials of such
substance and grade as will ensure future buildabillty of the Property and
suitability for its intended use; removing all hazardous protrusions from the
ground of whatever nature and wherever /located on the Property; by
securing all wires, cables, pipes and pipelines of any nature; by removing
any items which may attract unwanted rodents or other animals; and by
•
14. The parties hereto hereby agree that the rights and remedies afforded them
respectively by law, equity or this Agreement are distinct and cumulative and may
be exercised concurrently, independently or successively.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto affixed their signatures.
BUYER:
SELLER:
The City of Mendota Heights
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
:ss
COUNTY OF
City Clerk
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
19, by
STATE OF' MINNESOTA )
:ss
COUNTY OF
Notary Public
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,
19_, by Charles E. Mertensotto and Kathleen Swanson, respectively the Mayor and
City Clerk of the City of Mendota Heights, a municipality existing under the laws
of Minnesota, on behalf of the municipality.
Notary Public
ExE
•
•
d
•
•
0
r
•
4
•
•' r
r
e1
.11
nit
1
•
a
'i
1
AGREEMENT
This Agreement made this day of , 19 by and
between ("Bund the City of
Mendota Heights, a municipality existing under the laws of Minnesota ("Seller").
WHEREAS, Seller is the owner of certain real property located at
, Mendota Heights, Minnesota (the "Property"),
and the improvement(S) thereon, including all buildings and structures used for
residential, garage, storage, decorative or privacy purposes (the "Improvements");
WHEREAS, Seller has received various bids to purchase the Improvements, and after
due consideration has resolved to accept Buyer's bid; and
WHEREAS, Buyer and Seller mutually desire to enter into an agreement stating the
terms, conditions and obligations of each party to the sale and purchase of the
Improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants contained herein and for other
good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto hereby -agree as fol lows:
1. Seller acknowledges receipt of the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) cash
from Buyer, escrowed pending satisfactory completion- bf the obligations of Purchaser
under this Agreement (the "Escrow Amount").
2. Seller has this day sold to Buyer the Improvements for the sum of
Dollars ($ ) payable in full at
closing by certified check.
3. Buyer agrees to purchase the Improvements "as is" and acknowledges that
Seller makes no representations or warranties of any nature whatsoever regarding the
Improvements, including without limitation, their condition and suitability for any
conceivable use. Buyer agrees to comply with Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 501 (attached)
4. Subject to performance of this Agreement by Buyer, Seller agrees to execute
and deliver to Buyer a 131H of Sale conveying fee title to the improvements.
5. Buyer shall have ninety (90) days following the date of closing within which to
complete the following at Buyer's sole expense and to Seller's sole satisfaction:
a) To remove the Improvements or cause the same to be removed from the
Property.
b) To make safe all hazardous remains on the Property by filling all exposed
basements and/or cellars and any other excavations with materials of such
substance and grade as will ensure future buildability of the Property and
suitability for its intended use; removing all hazardous protrusions from the
ground of whatever nature and wherever located on the Property; by
securing all wires, cables, pipes and pipelines of any nature; by removing
any Items which may attract unwanted rodents or other animals; and by
performing or causing to be performed on the Property any and all other
acts which the reasonably prudent person would deem necessary or
advisable to make the Property and surrounding area free from foreseeable
hazards.
c) To remove all debris from the Property.
d) To restore to the Property a suitable appearance in light of surrounding
property; provided, however, Buyer need not re -seed or re -sod the
Property.
6. Buyer agrees to use reasonable care to avoid damaging vegetation in the
process of removing the Improvements and restoring the Property to or placing the
Property in the condition described in paragraph 5 hereof.
7. Buyer agrees to indemnify Seller and hold Seiler harmless for any and all
liability, loss, damages, costs, obligations, causes of action and claims of any nature
whatsoever, including without limitation attorney fees, relating to, arising out of or
in connection with the Improvements, and/or their removal from the Property, and/or
failure of Buyer to perform its or his obligations hereunder..
8. Mover shall, at Movers own expense, procure and maintain public liability
insurance in amounts aggregating at least $500,000 Dollars, against
claims for bodily injury, death and property damage occurring on or about the
Property or in connection with the Improvements and their removal and shall cause
the Seller to be named as an additional insured thereunder, and shall provide
evidence of such insurance prior to delivery of the Bill of Sale.
9. Mover shall maintain workers' compensation insurance in such amounts and on
such terms as are required by statute and shall provide evidence of such insurance
prior to delivery of the Bill of Sale.
10. If the work contemplated by this Agreement is not completed within ninety
(90) days of closing Buyer shall forfeit to Seller all rights to the Improvements as
well as the Escrow Amount. In such event, Seller may, at Its discretion, resell or
demolish the Improvements and shall bear no liability or obligation to repay or
reimburse Buyer for any part of the Escrow Amount or expenses incurred by Buyer.
Upon satisfactory completion of the obligations of Buyer hereunder, Seller shall
refund the Escrow Amount to Buyer.
11. This Agreement is the full and complete agreement of the parties hereto.
12. No amendment, modification, termination, or waiver of any provision of this
Agreement shall be effective unless the same is in writing and signed by, the parties
hereto.
13. Any provision of this Agreement which is prohibited or unenforceable shall be
ineffective to the extent of such prohibltion or unenforceability without Invalidating
the remaining provisions hereof.
2
14. The parties hereto hereby agree that the rights and remedies afforded them
respectively by law, equity or this Agreement are distinct and cumulative and may
be exercised concurrently, Independently or successively.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto affixed their signatures.
BUYER:
SELLER:
The City of Mendota Heights
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
:s5
COUNTY OF )
City Clerk
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
19_, by .
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
:ss
COUNTY OF )
,
Notary Public
The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
19 , by Charles E. Mertensotto and Kathleen Swanson, respectively the Mayor and
City Clerk of the City of Mendota Heights, a municipality existing under the laws
of Minnesota, on behalf of the municipality.
Notary Public
7 i
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 30, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistan
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-38: Landkamer - Variance
DISCUSSION
Mr. John Landkamer, of 659 Third Avenue, appeared before the
Planning Commission for a public hearing on his variance request on
October 22, 1991. Mr. Landkamer desires to replace a single car
garage with a slightly larger single car garage. This improvement
requires a side yard setback variance of seven feet (7') to
reconstruct the garage at its existing location. The front yard
setback is non -conforming and requires a "housekeeping" variance of
eight feet (8').
The Planning Commission closed the public hearing and
expressed no concerns about Mr. Landkamers's proposed improvement.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend that City
Council approve a side yard setback variance of seven feet (7') and
a front yard setback variance of eight feet (8') to allow
reconstruction of a single car garage as proposed in Case
File No. 91-38.
ACTION REQUIRED
Meet with the applicant. If the Council desires to implement
the Planning Commission's recommendation they should pass a motion
granting a seven foot (7') side yard setback variance and an eight
foot (8') front yard setback variance to allow reconstruction of a
single car garage, as proposed.
KLB:kkb
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
BACKGROUND
INCC)I Or.aii I,
CONSULTING PLANNERS
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
300 FIRST AVENUE NORTH
SUITE 210
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
612.139.3300
22 October 1991
91-38
John F. Landkamer
659 Third Avenue
Front and Side Yard Setback
Variance
The applicant is proposing to replace the existing, attached, single -stall garage on his property at the
above address. The existing garage is in relatively poor condition and does not have adequate room
for typical residential storage or work space. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing garage
and construct a new single -stall garage of slightly larger dimensions. The applicant's site plan
illustrates the dimension of the new garage as compared to the existing structure. The proposed
garage will maintain the same side yard setback as the previous structure (3 feet), but will extend 8
inches closer to the front lot line. In addition, the rear 13 feet 6 inches of the new garage is to be
extended 4 feet further west, essentially wrapping the garage space around this corner of the house.
The subject property is legally non -conforming with respect to the side yard setback for the existing
garage as well as the front yard setback for the house itself. The existing garage is located within 3
feet of the eastern property line. In addition, the house on this property is setback roughly 22 feet
from the front lot line (the garage portion is set back further than the house and does not encroach
on the required front yard). The corresponding setback requirements in the Mendota Heights Zoning
Ordinance are 10 feet and 30 feet respectively. A 7 -foot side yard setback variance is necessary to
allow the proposed reconstruction.
The subject porperty is located in an area that was platted with substandard lots. Many of the lots
on this block have the same substandard dimensions as the subject property. In some cases lots have
been combined to create larger lots to meet the minimum lot dimensions required in the Ordinance.
The Section map for this area also indicates a 20 -foot platted alley running down the rear property
lines of the lots on this block. This alley was never built and the right of way for it has since been
vacated.
Landkamer Variance
DISCUSSION
22 October 1991 Page 2
Before we get into discussing the specific variance criteria, there are some issues we would like to
clarify related to the property's legal non -conforming status. First, as stated earlier, the house on
this property has two non -conforming setbacks. Only one of these, the side yard setback, is affected
by the proposed garage reconstruction. The house also extends 8 feet into the required front yard.
The City has, in the past, pursued the policy of granting variances for other substandard setbacks,
on legal non -conforming lots, at the same time they are reviewing a variance request for an
unrelated condition. These are sometimes called "housekeeping variances". Generally, they serve
the purpose of sanctioning or justifying a condition that a variance would have been granted for had
the Zoning Ordinance been in place when the lot was developed.
Another way of thinking of this is that by granting this type of variance, the City is saying that they
would like to see this condition continue. This point is especially important in the case where a
non -conforming structure is severely damaged. Section 4.3(4) of the Mendota Heights Zoning
Ordinance basically says that if a non -conforming structure is damaged either by fire, flood,
explosion or other event (not the actions of the owner) and the damage to the structure exceeds 50
percent or more of its value, then the structure may only be reconstructed in accordance with the
provisions of the Ordinance. Therefore, if the City believes the current location is appropriate and
would want to allow the structure to be reconstructed to a similar condition as it was before the fire,
then the necessary housekeeping variances should be granted.
In the case of the subject property, there is no reason why the house could not have been built to the
required setback. However, the adjacent homes on both sides of the subject property are built to the
same setback and, therefore, the City would probably want to allow the structure to be rebuilt in its
current location in order to preserve the uniform aesthetic character of this area. Thus, an 8 -foot
variance to the front yard setback would be appropriate for this property.
Another issue related to the fact that the property is non -conforming has to do with one of the
criterion for granting a variance, which requires that variances not be contrary to the intent of the
Zoning Ordinance. Generally, the intent with respect to non -conforming structures is to gradually
eliminate them or alter them to bring them into conformance with the Ordinance. This idea is
supported by several statements in Section 4.3 of the Zoning Ordinance such as Section 4.3(4)
described above.
This thinking certainly applies when an owner proposes to demolish a non -conforming structure for
redevelopment. However, Section 4.3(10) of the Zoning Ordinance allows for alterations to a legal
non -conforming structure when those alterations improve the livability of the structure, provided
these alterations do not increase the number of dwelling units or the bulk of the building. Clearly,
the additional storage and work space provided by the garage expansion constitutes an improvement
to the overall livability of the home on the subject property as well as its appearance.
The question for the the Planning Commission is whether the proposed reconstruction of the garage
exceeds the intent of the term "alterations" as used in this section of the Ordinance. In addition, the
bulk of the proposed garage is slightly increased over the existing structure and would, therefore, be
• considered an intensification of a non -conforming use. In this case, the increase in bulk is so small
that we believe it is of little consequence.
VARIANCE CRITERIA
i
Landkamer Variance
22 October 1991 Page 3
We believe the applicant's request for a 7 -foot side yard setback variance is consistent with the
criteria set forth in the Ordinance in several important ways. The principal purpose of the variance
is to allow for the reasonable and intended use of property in cases where strict application of the
provisions of the ordinance would prevent such use due to some unique characteristic of the
property. Clearly, a garage is part of what would be considered reasonable use of a single-family lot
in a suburban area. In fact, the City has further defined reasonable use of a single-family lot to
include two -stall garages by requiring them for new homes built in the City (see Section 4.18(4)).
The applicant is proposing only a single -stall garage, the dimensions of which (275 square feet) are
only slightly greater than the minimum 12 -foot by 20 -foot (240 square feet).
The key factor to consider when reviewing variances is the existence of a "hardship" or "practical
difficulty" that is the result of characteristics that are unique to the property. The characteristics
unique to this lot include the fact that at 7,500 square feet it is only half the size of the minimum lot
required by the Zoning Ordinance. More importantly, the width of the lot is only 60 feet as
compared to the 100 -foot minimum required by ordinance. The 10 -foot side yard setback was
established based on the 100 -foot lot width. In addition, the existing home and garage on the
property were built prior to the adoption of the Ordinance. As a result of these factors, it would be
impossible to accommodate an attached garage on the property without violating the setback
regulations in the Zoning Ordinance.
One option that was reviewed was to demolish the existing garage and construct a freestanding
structure elsewhere on the property to eliminate the non -conforming condition. In the case of Mr.
Landkamer's property, the only available location would be in the rear of the lot where there is
more room to provide the required side and rear yard setbacks.
There are several factors that make this option undesirable. First, the alley that was platted for this
area was never built and was subsequently vacated, therefore, locating a garage at the rear of the lot
would require lengthening the driveway to provide access to the structure. This would result in
additional impervious surface and storm water runoff, increase the amount of maintenance (snow
shoveling, etc.), and substantially increase the cost of the project.
Second, and perhaps more importantly, most of the other homes on this block have the garages up
near the front of the lot, as is the case on the subject property. This is one of the elements that
creates a unified character for the neighborhood and results in relatively uncluttered space in the
'rear yards of the lots in this area. Therefore, to locate a garage in the rear yard of the subject
property would be inconsistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. Granting the
variance would preserve the existing character of the neighborhood.
The proposed garage reconstruction will improve the appearance of the existing home from the
surrounding homes and from Third Avenue. The proposed structure, like the existing structure,
would be relatively well screened from the surrounding properties due to both the existing
vegetation and the fact that it is staggered back on the property. All but two of the adjacent land
owners have signed the applicant's consent form indicating they have reviewed the plans for the
project and are not opposed to it.
ACTION
The Planning Commission should conduct the public hearing in accordance with Section 5.5(4) of
the Zoning Ordinance and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the 7 -foot side
yard setback variance and the 8 -foot front yard housekeeping variance.
•
81
NORTH
PARK
1
•
•
4�
0
0
N iJ
11111,0111 1.1
0 �a
NPI!!
;I• o
rem!o , <SL
o
111i �11 1
•C
411111P
���,�SSSOCHIIOsEOALSE:T �PUELBEI•It��I 1
io o• sANNI
A��11 inIs a .
.;,•,,
• • • . • •
EMERBOK LL.0
BROOKSIOE LANE
•
0000
litrAstli
MI -. h O ..I..1. N,• .•LOs. ,�... .' :. W Mgt
• 111111 2-M I
.. , SUBJECT PROPERTY
• • - NORTH t
SCALE 1"=800'
_.1v • MNTM'OHTM (
PARK �;
- I L1 ;-..1
N 1L
IIT
P.W.( CIA
O
L
3 • 1—^
N
•
• •
SOMERSET
COUNTRY
C
a
1
GOL F
COURS•
(Private)
2011
104 8
e7•
I1I � / / ' � 1s • 1 `
A
•
•
•
0
RN
MrY
GA 4.L
•
a
•
MENOOTA HEIGHTS
PAR 3 GOLF COURSE
( PUBLIC)
•
AVENUE
o0vgvdo. mom"
lisnAdviegi
0 DADO ao
• •R.
v1 minims
•
•
•
•
\•1.11. a
C
R]
T9
..
1 /4,
.p•
,y
•
4
•
t 4. 1
;ti
() iV�, L I f
39.03 , ,:5 1 ,i5
t,`, t21.643 1 ,05 l
'
3 4RtnfRAOGi-L,dt cs4
J m
2. .035 7., 105 �. .os ^1 /05
-718 . S.
- _ t
, ^y ,
4;, : REARANGEMENT OF
BLOCK 9 T.T. SMITH: W
to SUBDIVISION NO. ' 9 10 /1 /L
-k
33 ' B i , , , . , ` SUBJECT PROPERTY
1 1 1
6 T
9
/0
1
7
/3
/4-
/5
/G 17
B
e
7 NnG
G
ZN
R S
5
4
3
z
/
9
/0
//
/Z
/3
/4-
/5
/G 17
Z
9
7
G
S
1 i4
4
3
Z
/ y
tg
7.;
I 4... 1
1 r 1
1 1 1 1 1
-.Si 19
111.19 1 IIS
I13"
i K A —7.1.I ! •;
3103 I I:s 1 ,jS
v'224�.0/3� i I.13 I
3 r,Rt/A, RA11' GLIIil:L.!`d
0
.03.5b = 105 X. ;05
11e s..
0
V
\/, ,r r
.. REARANGEMENT OF M
BLOCK 9 T.T. SMITH;
c „ 9,,' r
.' I
to ; SUBDIVISION NO_ ',�^ 9 ,o „ ,L
. . .
'A 6 f s+; ^ _ SUBJECT PROPERTY
NORTH T
..1,;; '''v 0 '50 "•E IS. ,..1
SCALE 1"=200'
16 7
p
7
1
S
wt
3
z
8
7 y\6
/0
S 4
L,
3
2
/
p
7
G
S
wt
3
z
/ y
9
/0
//
/Z
)3
/.F-
/5
/L h
p
7
G
S
4
3
z
/ y
CON
/../-‘
0 t V Y
%L(,)
1S
1 .-J 1..J • 4/ I
rtl
1
4.3
'n 2
3
r
4'
S'
Iz
h 1/
/o
5
6
7
3124.40
CON
MI I
0
2
c
S M
N 89°18.22••E. 180.00
° O I ..
93 F3 0 o.m
N.8"18.25-7 E
B _ _OAS v -
n W r
N.8998'.<32 3"E 7,m
180.90 1,
9 m e 9%, u, a
0 3
m N N.Er? 18'23"E. m
180.00
0
N
L0
INIU
-s
/ /.6B /3z
f
Z ib
7
z
.1
D
.�/SS
IL
2-'
1 o Y /0 yl
7C OMIT ,•.
3
s.
B
S7
7
S7
L
r\,
P'( 5
/34 t Y
f
M C • 7 j•,•
•I T1
M �
S N4• 9
Gc
"/
4-2
j,
z4/ -9j _ v
ti•
3'
p J
1 /')D , /7..,11•
4 T=
/32
Ill NO
32
47
z
4
2^
3dJ
0
.tifs-
3
/ 94.''.5
sz
,�
..•
CON
MI I
0 t V Y
%L(,)
1S
/4
'3
/Z
wI`I0
7
$
7
6,
nM
7"
4 Z
3
\ 1
•941MERSE�
I97;77'
/
O
11
22
BIM
24
LD
40
N
24
43
r
I 2 7
O • 2$
� 29
�Tss
I I..
.Ql?'
z0.
I IL/ I
M. Ili rin5a I Z/ win LS
S� z c/ate E I rkf9/-•/%
e9
/v.I. a. cE. 4ZAOA
,e".Ac s et/
5.-n S".E Olf Aix
25 41‘41. "t
C;afrair- / ? fr? off ,oloViiffrj 07C- Ai+ cf re_ '54 20 _Foy
„c40/_er 0
/ S7i-
J'
•
City of
Mendota .Heights
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
Case No.
Date of Application 10- I /
Fee Paid /b. 5O. 03 - a,.0
Applicant Name: LAf /i") 4M F/p_ PH: 4S 7 -
(Last) (First) (MI)
�'S 9 ��D/4-re447,-rt77
(Number & Street) (City)
Owner Name: �� 1 )9.o-Zt
(Last) (First)
Address:
Address: ✓z-"Gvr,02 711-- to f4
(Number & Street) (City)
Street Location of Property in Question:
(State) (Zip)
(ME)
S7//g—
(State) (Zip) •
Legal Description of Property:
Type of Request:
Rezoning ,
' Conditional Use Permit
Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D.
Plan•Approval ,...
Comprehensive Plan Amendment •
Applicable City Ordinance Number
Present Zoning of Property :' Present Use
>C Variance
Subdivision Approval
Wetlands Permit
- Other (attach explanation)
ection...
Proposed Zoning of Property `a Pro m
'� posed Use
"
I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional
material are true. - _ _ .:ar . x : ,n • i M
•
f
•
gnature of Applicant)""{;;.
Ota
o3e 641064-,E,
G-5-9 3
/at re/a4k /oaf
..c..6,4141-,• • 4LT
V
7/1..,/,✓
V
k I
•
/j,'f/res yr
43/".". M 01x0 -Z
,c[-h(ovyy .iaid Ito
W/"2 p4 e»
53t"%s :'f1 :8 ,, Z//
7yo,,
'/d .X a
d
2,1
,/ /
..... __,....„., Ai, /4/44 tiWe'
City of
Mendota Heights
SIGNATURES OF CONSENT FOR VARIANCE REQUEST '
TO: The Planning Commission, City of Mendota Heights
FROM: Property Owners of t 0 + 1 S* 1 a 1 o Cle-- /6 c4
5 to&t:\i-ts(0. vi -I* 3
RE: 61.sz. v -c5 Se24-6,a.a- V:ct. r-to.m.C.c
kce vets fry c.+- t 0 Cre..rrik,
I Cr° t4,1 S Lao.
' 0 c-+c)b er- 21 ill Pbainntpl
a d
We the undersigned have reviewed the;plansfor (051 /hrtytve.
- • ‘..,00.NDko-vv\e,r)" •-• ° . • and•understand the terms and
conditions of the requested variance for d, 04. • ki cf....41444-
Va-v-t a IA Cat, 0 -7 . -
We have no obiections• to .this request and do herebygive our
written' consent and consent to waiver of public hearing. '
Sincerely,
JAME (Please Print) SIGNATURE ADDRESS (INCL. LOT)
L. E -r. 2.4c,
tsof B(..k- (0
ef/no, e L04-
66/1/IV E- And IA)..S'
71-0-7`
Lot 1
L-tti
5010‘64;w•L* 3
1(
So vv-tLcse+ Oast
Re. f
1101 Victoria:Ctiriehielidota- Heights; ,A#IN
2.:1850
DIA
•
-City of
Mendota Heights
October 30, 1991
Mr. John Landkamer
659 Third Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Landkamer:
Your application for a Variance will be considered by the City
Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be
held on Tuesday, November 5, 1991. The Council meeting starts at
7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You,
or a representative should plan on attending the meeting in order
that your application will receive Council consideration . The
Planning Commission recommended 4-0 that City Council grant a seven
foot (7') side yard setback variance to allow construction of a
single -stall garage and an eight foot (8') front yard setback
variance to bring Mr. Landkamer's existing home into conformance
with City Code.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
OAP -1;1,N &wQ-
Kevin
Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
Enclosures:
City Council Agenda
Staff Memo to City Council
City of
Mendota Heights
October 16, 1991
Mr. John Landkamer
659 3rd Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Landkamer:
Your application for a Variance will be considered by the Planning
Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be
held on Tuesday, October 22, 1991, The Planning Commission meeting
starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hall in the Council
Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the
meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission
consideration.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:mlk
Enclosures: Planning Commission Agenda
Planner's Report
1101 Victoria Curve -Mendot&Heights;, MN.- 55118 tA,452
- CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
NOTICE OF HEARING
October 14, 1991
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of
Mendota Heights will meet at 7:30 o'clock P.M., or as soon as
possible thereafter, on Tuesday, October 22, 1991, in the City
Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights,
Minnesota, to consider an application from Mr. John Landkamer for
a Side Yard Setback Variance to allow a garage reconstruction at
the following described property:
Lot 15, Block 10, Smith's Subdivision No. 3.
More particulary, this property is located at 659 3rd
Avenue.
This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance
No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to
the proposed Side Yard Setback Variance will be heard at this
meeting.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE SENT 10-14-91
John Landkamer 659 3rd Avenue
Gilbert Zaun
1475 Somerset Court
Alfred Bauman
663 3rd Avenue
Greg Hawkins
655 3rd Avenue
Mark & Rita Desmond
656 2nd Avenue S.
Carol Hayes
660 2nd Avenue S.
Mike Solac
664 2nd Avenue S.
John & Joan Zeller
665 3rd Avenue
Jay Bremer
1480 Somerset Ct.
TO:
FROM: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistan
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-39: Schuster - Variance
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 30, 1991
Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
DISCUSSION
Ms. Betty Schuster, of 1900 Wachtler Avenue, appeared before
the October 22, 1991, Planning Commission as a last minute add on
agenda item to request a 3.7 foot side yard abutting a street
setback variance. (See attached staff memo).
Because this item was an add on, there is no Planner's Report.
The Planning Commission had no concerns regarding this request for
a variance.
RECOMMENDATION
• The Planning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend that City
Council grant a 3.7 foot side yard abutting a street setback
variance to bring the garage into conformance and allow the
building permit to be issued for the proposed addition.
ACTION REQUIRED
Meet with the applicant. If the City Council desires to
implement the Planning Commission's recommendation, they should
pass a motion granting a 3.7 foot side yard abutting a street
setback variance to bring the garage into conformance and allow the
building permit to be issued for the proposed addition.
KLB:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 22, 1991
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistan
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-39: Schuster - Variance
DISCUSSION
Mr. Joe Schuster, of 1900 Wachtler Avenue, has been placed on
tonight's agenda after meeting with Tim Malloy on Monday, October
21st. Mr. Schuster is requesting a 3.7 foot side yard abutting a
street setback variance to bring his existing garage into
conformance with City code. He is proposing to build a 10' by 13'
bathroom addition on the rear of the house that is not related to
the setback, non-conformance issue. This is considered a
"housekeeping variance".
Mr. Schuster has obtained the signatures of consent from all
the neighbors within 100' of his property. This enables the public
hearing to be waived. There is not a written Planner's Report for
this application, as it was just filed yesterday, however, the
Planner will be prepared to offer a verbal review.
ACTION REQUIRED
The Planning Commission should decide if they wish to hear
this case on tonight's agenda, and if so, they should make a
recommendation to the City Council on the requested 3.7' side yard
abutting a street setback variance.
KLB:kkb
21 October 1991 LETTER OF INTENT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION - 10-22-91
Re: New bathroom addition at the rear or Northeast corner of
our house (1900 Wachtler Avenue)
The addition will increase the first floor area to nearly 1600
sq. ft., more in line with existing requirements.
Betty and I are requesting a variance for a setback from Wachtler
which is 3'7" shy of 30 feet required for a corner lot. Ours is
a corner lot abutting Hilltop and Wachtler.
We first intend to construct an addition 200 sq. ft. for a bath-
room which will house a whirlpool tub, glass -enclosed shower,
linen closet, vanity and lavatory. Work is approved by the City
Building Inspector. All permits, licensing of contractors will be
granted if a variance is approved.
After we get approval to construct the addition, we will follow
with the following:
1. Reconstruct the garage roof or completely replace it
with an enlarged floor area.
2. Replace existing roofing and construct overhangs on the
existing roof.
3. Replace all existing windows with Anderson windows.
4. Apply new aluminum or steel siding over exterior.
Joseph 0. & Betty L.
Schuster
JAAAAAAA
Applicant Name:
Address:
City of
Mendota Heights
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
Case No. OCLU_-+ + q/- 39
Date of Application / D -al -97
Fee Paid •00 late_ * //n 75V
ys 7 A /3, y L . PH: �.s� 3 a 3 '
(Last) (First) (M1)
/ 9'0 0 W 9& '7 Cc/Z /1%iY/D o7,5,- /77745 /j/// 53/r
(Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip)
Owner Name: -%f4S %E.e., Jo S. p/7't
(Last) (First) (MI)
Address: / 9'' W//}-G,�TZE/Z Z%%/_--'/Y/.�o?/ /7/775 /%/Y ,SS///
(Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) ,
Street Location of Property in Question: S/f/91 r S - 'o X
Legal Description of Property:
Type of Request:
Rezoning k Variance
Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval
Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Wetlands Permit
- Plan ApprovalOther (attach explanation)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Applicable City Ordinance Number "4/D/ Section
Present Zoning of Property A9 Present Use
Proposed Zoning of Property • Proposed Use
I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional
material are true. •
(Signature"of Applicant)
X99
(Date)
(Received by - Title)
1101 Victoria Curve •Mendota Heights; MN = 55118 : = 452.1850 ..A
City of
Mendota Heights
SIGNATURES OF CONSENT FOR VARIANCE REQUEST
TO: The Planning Commission, City of Mendota Heights
FROM: Property Owners of HUs
HOC) L3Jac14 e AU -e. v -e_
62-k_ v‘ U0.. r kck "CO r
(C)
We the undersigned have reviewed the plans for 6kailt-hc'''‘ lae-ch/a-exjo-n
avt(9 &.v4+ y4st9 : and understand the terms and
conditions of the requested variance for 15'0,0 clAt(4..r- A\revi
We have no objections to this request and do hereby give our
written consent and consent to waiver of public hearing.
Sincerely,
BE (Please Print)
.r.s. Hank Hovland
Vince
JSPt 4- Rb5
Duddleston
. &Aries 2.e:
6mno
[Albite
Thompson
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS (INCL. LOT)
1i" 2a
co 1- I S
Lo(
L-0
e K VA4/4-AJd.6
Lvt-
1101 Victoria Curve .Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 452-1850
City of
Mendota Heights
October 30, 1991
Ms. Betty Schuster
1900 Wachtler Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Ms. Schuster:
Your application for a Variance will be considered by the City
Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be
held on Tuesday, November 5, 1991. The Council meeting starts at
7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You,
or a representative should plan on attending the meeting in order
that your application will receive Council consideration . The
Planning Commission recommended 5-0 that City Council grant a 3.7
foot side yard abutting a street setback variance to bring the
Schuster's existing garage into conformance with City Code.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
Enclosures: City Council Agenda
Staff Memo to City Council
. ...., ,.....,,
.'. endota?He ,....,
ctortarxrp.:
„CA1-;47-.....,,,.. 41i, -.k.,,,,,,,14,,,,,,,;+-
,
..'"•••';';.i•";::1-'7ii' ''''' ' '''''' ':- - '''...:^;.::::. ......."--.7E•':.1.,'.;a:';''tl',IL-:"--c';6:':.' . ,... .
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 30, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistar1�./
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-35: Knaeble - Subdivision
DISCUSSION
The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on the
Knaeble Subdivision at their September and October meetings. In
addition, the Planning Commission also conducted a special meeting
site visit on Saturday, October 19th, that was attended by the
applicants and area neighbors.
Issues that the Planning Commission desired to address with
the special meeting included impact on the existing trees, impact
on the surrounding properties, drainage, wet soils and flag lots.
The minutes provide a good discussion of these issues. See
attached September 30th staff letter and October 14th applicant
response. A soil report is also included.
The Planning Commission was also concerned about how the
subdivision, and flag lots in particular, fit into any master plan
for this area. A street circulation plan had recently been
completed in conjunction with the Gesell Subdivision in 1990. That
street circulation plan was reviewed by the Planning Commission and
is attached for Council review. The Planning Commission felt the
Knaeble proposal could occur without affecting development, or
impacting, surrounding properties.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend that the City
Council grant preliminary plat approval with the following
conditions:
1. That a Wetlands Permit be granted allowing construction
within eighty feet (80') of the two creeks and allowing a
driveway culvert to be installed across the creek with its
size to be approved by City Engineering staff.
2. That the originally proposed Outlot A be transferred to
the property on the south.
ACTION REOUIRED
Meet with the applicant. If the City Council desires to
implement the Planning Commission's recommendation, they should
pass a motion granting preliminary plat approval, based on plans
dated , with the following conditions:
1. That a Wetlands Permit be granted allowing construction
within eight feet (80') of the two creeks and allowing a
driveway culVert to be installed across the creek with its
size to be approved by City Engineering staff.
2. That the originally proposed Outlot A be transferred to
the property on the south.
KLB:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 16, 1991
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-35: Knaeble - Subdivision
DISCUSSION:
At the September meeting, the Planning Commission continued
the public hearing in order to meet on the site on Saturday,
October 19th and to give the applicant time to submit additional
information required to address Planning Commission concerns.
See attached staff letter dated September 30, 1991.
We have attached the additional information Mr. Knaeble has
submitted. Last month's material has not been reproduced, if any
members of the Planning Commission desire another copy, please
contact staff at City Hall and it will be provided. Also
enclosed is a street circulation plan that was completed in
conjunction with the Gesell subdivision.
Saturday's meeting will be an informal Planning Commission
meeting and any questions you may have can be addressed at that
time or prior to Tuesday evening.
ACTION REOUIRED:
For Tuesday evening, conduct the continued public hearing.
Make a recommendation to City Council on the proposed preliminary
plat and wetlands permits.
KLB:mlk
1
..�. f I x,
w
.^,.1rs"7"''..c/gam
Hon Krueger
Sr Associates, Inc.
8080 Wallace Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
(612) 934-4242
October 14, 1991
Kevin Batchelder
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Re: Revised Preliminary Plat
Pine Creek Estates
1760 Dodd Road
Dear Kevin:
ngmneering
aad .ut e-y_tngI
acinmg _— .-
Per our meeting with you, Jim Danielson, and Tim Malloy on September 30th,
we have revised our Preliminary Plat for this project (attached 20 copies). We
understand that this project will be in front of the Planning Commission again
on October 22nd. Per our discussion and your letter of September 30th, we
have addressed the four items that you noted. Also attached is a copy of the Soil
Report as requested.
1. As we discussed in our meeting, we understand that the City is concerned
about the ultimate disposition of Outlot A. Based on the City's suggestion, we
have now shown Outlot A as part of our proposed Lot 3.
2. At our meeting on September 30th, we discussed the proposed sanitary
sewer with the City Engineer, Jim Danielson. As we discussed with him, the
revised Preliminary Plat shows the proposed 6" sanitary sewer that will serve
the two proposed houses. Based on the City's as-builts, this sewer will provide
gravity sewer service to the basements of both proposed homes, and will have
approximately 2.2 feet of cover at the creek crossing. We concur with Jim that
this crossing (with insulation) will function • adequately. We also are assuming
that the sewer crossing of Dodd Road will required jacking or augering.
3. The attached Preliminary Plat shows the tree survey that we prepared per
your request. The plan indicates that only _ three surveyed trees will be
removed for the proposed construction (#23-19" maple,' #24-28" ash, & #27- ' =
13",18" ash). Tree #27 appears to be dying, and tree #24 -could be saved with a •
slight shifting of the proposed driveway. The house on Lot 3 would also ... , -
require the removal of some `existing unsurveyed r pines (planted - by ' the' Owner,' •<
of the property) and small scrub trees. It would be our intent to preserve " - : :•
those trees outside the required grading limits for the .proposed houses. '`` The
tree survey shows that no significant trees would be affected by the City
approving the 80 foot creek setback as we are requesting.
4. We believe that our wetland permit request to work 20 feet into the 100
foot creek zone complies with the following applicable ordinance
requirements in Section 7:
1. Our proposed grading is located in areas of minimal vegetation. We
will be preserving the vast majority of the existing trees and
vegetation on the site, and within 100 feet of the creeks.
2-7. Not applicable.
8. Per the restrictive covenants, the two home sites will be restored
with sod as soon as possible after construction.
9-10. Not applicable
11. According to Jim Danielson, no 100 year flood elevation is
established for this area. Jim indicated that this area has an
emergency surface overflow elevation at Dodd Rd. & Marie Ave. of
about 875. This elevation is about 15 feet below our proposed
basement elevations.
12. This proposal will have no adverse impacts on adjacent homes.
13. See #1 above.
14. As shown on our Preliminary Plat, we will only be removing
vegetation within the "W" district due to reasonable driveway and
home construction. We believe that the two home site locations
shown are the only reasonable use of this property.
15-16. Our proposed plat will have an insignificant impact on the existing
natural run-off rate. The existing barns and two sheds will be
removed and will be replaced with two new homes.
17. The quality of the water infiltrated to the water table will remain
undisturbed by this project.
18-20. Not applicable.
21-22. Our restrictive covenants will require that the home builders
restore the home sites with sod as soon as possible after
construction.
23. As shown on our Preliminary Plat, this development will not
reduce the existing crown cover by more than 50%.
In conclusion we believe that this project meets the City standards, and will be
an asset to this neighborhood and community. We understood from our
meeting with you on September 30th, that this revised Preliminary Plat will be
supported by the City staff. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please call.
Sincerely,
l / /
if
Peter Kn eble, P.E.
RON KRUEGER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CC.`. James Taylor
Gretchen Nodstrom-Ahrens
113City of
Mendota Heights
September 30, 1991
Mr. Peter Knaeble
6001 Glenwood Avenue
Golden Valley, MN 55422
Dear Mr. Knaeble,
I am writing to formally notify you that the Planning Commission
continued the public hearing, on Case No. 91-35: Knaeble
Subdivision, until their October 22, 1991 meeting. The public
hearing was continued by the Planning Commission to provide time to
generate, for the public record, information pertaining to some
concerns raised at the hearing.
The Planning Commission suggested
addressed for the October meeting:
1. A proposal for Outlot A that is
the future use of the outlot.
that the following items be
more definitive and identifies
2. A proposal that addresses the provision of City sewer and
water. A specific concern was the elevations of the sanitary
sewer as it relates to crossing the creek and hooking up at
Dodd Road.
3. A tree survey that identifies significant vegetation and trees
and identifies areas that will be cleared, or preserved. See
Subdivision Ordinance 301, Section 4.1(2)h and Section
4.1(3)h.
4. Address Section 7 of the Wetlands Ordinance, "Standards
Pursuant to Issuance of Permit".
Should you desire to have this information forwarded to the
Planning Commission with their October meeting packet, this
information should be submitted to the City of Mendota Heights
prior to 12 p.m. noon, on Monday October 14, 1991. For plans done
on blueprint paper, or sized larger than 11" x 17", it will be
necessary to provide 20 copies.
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
hand delivered
1101 Victoria Curve -Mendota Heights, MN • q5118- - 452.1850
I \CC)U PC)RAI FIl
CONSULTING PLANNERS
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
.30(1 FIRST AVENUE NORTH
SUITE 210
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
612•.33Q•3.300
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ACTION REQUESTED:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
24 September 1991
91-35
Peter J. Knaeble
1760 Dodd Road
Subdivision Preliminary
Plat Approval, Wetlands
Permit, Variance
1. The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject property
into three single-family lots, two of which would be flag
lots. The preliminary plat drawing shows all three lots
utilizing the same 15 -foot access drive, which would run
along the south side of the property and enter onto Dodd
Road in roughly the same location as the current driveway.
Lot 1 would include the existing home owned by Mr. and
Mrs. Walker.
2. The proposed lots meet all of the minimum lot requirements
within the R-1 District except for Lots 2 and 3, which do
not meet the criteria (100 feet). The applicant is
requesting a variance for each of these lots. In
addition, the property is traversed by two small drainage
ways that are identified on the City's Wetland Systems
Map. The applicant is requesting a wetland permit to allow
the installation of a culvert to accommodate the proposed
access drive for Lots 2 and 3 and to allow construction of
the proposed single-family homes to within 80 feet of the
centerline of the drainage ways. The latter is being
requested even though the footprints of the proposed
homes, as shown on the Preliminary Plat, do not encroach
upon the 100 -foot protected area. Apparently the
developers would like to have some flexibility in the
exact location and size of the potential homes.
Peter Knaeble, Case No. 91-35 Page 2
3. The subject property is a long narrow parcel located east
of Dodd Road in an area that has remained predominantly
large lot single-family in character. While the property
is zoned R-1 it is situated within an area for which no
planned pattern of roadways has been defined. This area,
which is over 1/4 mile in size is bounded on the west by
Dodd Road, on the south by Marie Avenue on the east by
Delaware Avenue and on the north by Wentworth Avenue (see
attached map). This region contains one of the City's few
remaining large contiguous tracts of R -1A zoning. One of
the reasons this portion of the City has remained
unplanned is the existence of a large wetland system that
encompasses much of the central part of the area. Several
scenarios for providing roadways through the area have
been examined, but no official plan has been adopted. The
issue of how to best provide roadways through this area
becomes more crucial as properties, like the subject
property, around its perimeter are subdivided. The City
should consider establishing a master plan to guide the
overall development of this area.
4. Due to its long narrow shape, the subject property could
be better developed if it were combined with other
adjacent properties in a fashion that would allow for the
dedication of a public roadway. Such an arrangement could
eliminate the need for flag lots and could also contribute
to the establishment of a roadway system that could serve
a larger area. Obviously, such an arrangement would
require not only the establishment of a master plan for
the area, but also the cooperation and coordinated effort
of surrounding property owners.
5. On this note, the staff has already had inquiries
regarding subdivision from the adjacent property owners to
the south who met with us at our September 16th office
hours meeting. This property has similar characteristics
as the subject property and its subdivision would require
similar variances and wetland permits. The combination
of these two lots would provide enough room to dedicate
the public right-of-way necessary to install a cul-de-sac
and thereby eliminate the need for flag lots on either
property. The fact that the adjacent property owners are
contemplating subdividing their property raises the
question of whether there might not be others in this area
who would be willing to cooperate in a broader effort. At
the very least, we believe it would be prudent to continue
the Applicant's request to allow time for them to discuss
the possibility of collaborating with the adjacent
property owners to the south. Should the City approve the
Peter Knaeble, Case No. 91-35 Page 3
applicant's variance and wetland permit, they would be
hard pressed to refuse the same requests from other
property owners in this area.
6. In the interim, we would recommend that the City reexamine
the issue of how to provide a system of roads for the
surrounding area in a manner that accomplishes the City's
development objectives most efficiently and with the least
environmental impact.
7. Having said this, it is important to note that the
applicant has the right to have his proposal reviewed on
its own merits. As we mentioned in the first paragraph,
the proposed lots meet all but one of the lot size
criteria in the zoning ordinance. Lots 2 and 3 are flag
lots and do not meet the minimum lot width requirement.
The primary concern with flag lots is that they result in
homes that are isolated making emergency and fire service
more difficult. In the case of the proposed Preliminary
Plat, the access drive is particularly long and narrow.
The longest flag neck is 452 feet in length. There are
several other lots of similar configuration as the subject
property within the unplanned area described earlier. By
allowing flag lots in this instance the City could be
opening the door for many such requests.
8. The Preliminary Plat also shows a small outlot. Such
parcels can be a problem in that they are not owned by any
of the residents and tend to be left unmaintained. This
land should either be incorporated into one of the other
lots or could perhaps be offered to the adjacent property
owner under some agreement.
9. Permanent access easements would also be required over the
narrow portions of Lots 2 and 3. Lot 3 would have to
include access easements for both Lots 1 and 2 since it
appears that Lot 1 will continue to utilize the existing
curb cut onto Dodd Road. Similarly, Lot 2 would have to
include access easements for Lots 1 and 3.
10. With respect to the wetland permits, the principal concern
would be for the loss of trees on the property. There are
significant stands of trees in the areas adjacent to both
creeks. According to the Preliminary Plat drawing, there
would be no trees affected by locating a house within 80
feet of the creek on Lot 3. However, the plan shows a
continuous stand of trees in the area of the creek that
runs through Lot 2.
The proposed lots are spacious, over twice the minimum
size required by the ordinance. There is plenty of room
on these lots to accommodate a large home without having
to encroach on the 100 -foot wetland protection area. We
see no reason to grant wetland permits to allow the
construction of the homes on Lots 2 and 3 as requested by
Peter Knaeble, Case No. 91-35 Page 4
granting wetland permits, even when no need is
demonstrated, the value of the ordinance will be severely
undermined.
11. In summary, we have serious concerns about the' precedent
that would be set by granting the variances necessary to
allow the proposed flag lots. This .concern is related
both to the issue of access for emergency and fire
vehicles and to the potential impact this precedent would
have on the development pattern within the surrounding
area. Similar subdivisions could limit the City's ability
to develop a roadway system to serve the area.
SUBJECT PROPERTY
-j ' ' NORTH C
SCALE 1'=800'
CIT
ON
n 49429 3b f •" ..
Icy.! 4V ,
•
Jch/7 c^dh7 //
07` -f3
RICHARD (1.9- PAT suj
T. PooRE. )45,"/02_
T AND J
RICHARD Cid-PQTP
. FooR.E
3 .17 44. 21.201.
•
,,ADDITII QN
3
/07.7
/0 4,
io♦
(l5
/3
34. 97
ti
•3
ti
v
L
3
4
!4.749
0
4
ioc
o L.L
CK
c.o
5soz (.7
LANE
473. 3'7
O
'l5 0308 1'
/o
.zee ,e
GERALD B o4 L?1A B, p(/pEA{(R1( J,2t$_Ai
3
3
5 n
.54-(11 3
Zof
49
N
14sso"
,Pude,-14
SUBJECT PROPERTY _
NORTH t
SCALE f=200'
7 8 TM: 9
Sg
0
V
3
0
S
P'0
M AEI r; MARIE AV A v g
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
September 19, 1991
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistar
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-35: Knaeble - Subdivision
Public Hearing 8:00 P.M.
DISCUSSION:
Mr. Peter Knaeble is purchasing a 3 acre parcel from Lloyd
and Lucille Walker, at 1760 Dodd Road, for the purpose of
developing through subdivision. Mr. Knaeble has met with staff
on several occasions to prepare the plan attached. The lot is
long and narrow with two drainage ways running through the lot
that restrict development options. Mr. Knaeble proposes to
develop his lot by creating three lots, one of which contains the
existing home. Two new flag lots are proposed to be served by a
common driveway. The new lots are proposed to be located at the
eastern end of the property. See attached plans and report.
The existing barn and shed shown on the plans are proposed
to be removed. All the lots exceed the minimum area requirements
for an R-1 zone, however, because of the flag lot configuration
they lack the minimum 100' frontage on a public street
requirement. The proposed lots do have more than ample frontage
if calculated at the building setback.
The proposed houses are shown to be setback at the required
100' for the Wetlands boundary. However, the applicant has
indicated that potential buyers have shown interest in larger
houses and/or decks than shown on the plan. Therefore, the
applicant is requesting Wetlands Permits to build within 80' of
the two drainage ways.
After public notices were sent out, the neighbor to the
south, Mr. Fred Peterson, of 1770 Dodd Road met with staff to
review the proposal and discuss his development options in light
of this proposal. See attached site plan of 1770 Dodd Road.
The applicant has shown an outlot on the preliminary plat.
This outlot is proposed to be available for combining with Mr.
Peterson's parcel to the south to assist potential development
option. 'The City likes to be cautious about creating unbuildable
outlots, as there is potential for tax forfeiture.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Conduct the public hearing. Make a recommendation to City
Council on the proposed preliminary plat and Wetlands Permits.
KLB:mlk
El
Ron Krueger
R Associates, Inc.
8080 Wallace Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
;612) 934-4242
August 21, 1991
42011141111111111M14100% •
'fleecing
•
Kevin Batchelder
Planner
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Re: Letter of Intent
Pine Creek Estates
Dear Kevin:
'412 i t
As we have previously discussed with both yourself and Timothy Malloy, we
intend to subdivide the 3.0 acre property at 1760 Dodd Road into three lots,
inluding one lot with the existing house. Attached are 20 copies of the
Preliminary Plat, the application, and the $335 fee. The abstract certificate
listing the property owners within 350' will be submitted separately.
The proposed subdivision exceeds all of the minimum requirements, except for
the lot frontage for Lots 2 and 3. As we discussed, these two lots are proposed as
flag lots due to the substantial creek setbacks required, and to save the vast
majority of the existing trees on the property. As shown, there will be no
house construction; grading, or tree removal within the 100 foot creek
setbacks.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call.
Peter Knaeble, P.E.
RON KRUEGER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CC James Taylor
Gretchen Nodstrom-Ahrens
Lloyd & Lucille Walker
•
..r
.• 4:'.. M. ts.±:.,
-47 Yet tY•
+�FY7�f
ineenng
Ron Krueger
A Associates, Inc.
8080 Wallace Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
(612) 934-4242
September 6, 1991
Kevin Batchelder
Planner
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Re: Revised Preliminary Plat
Pine Creek Estates
1760 Dodd Road
Dear Kevin:
Per our meeting yesterday, we have revised the Preliminary Plat showing the
proposed 80' creek setbacks. Attached are 20 copies of the revised
Preliminary Plat and the $135 fee for the wetland permit.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call.
Sincerely,
ter Kna6b a P.E.
RON KRUEGER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Oa James Taylor
Gretchen Nodstrom-Ahrens
AA A A AA A
City of
Mendota Heights
Applicant Name:
Address:
Owner Name:
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
Case No.
Date of Application S- aa -9 I
Fee Paid WO 0.-41- ?(03 -"IS
PH: 5YZ 97y
;"-if"
4/ STY e- CC)
(State) (Zip)
j4&& T57
(Last) (First) (MI)
(960 ( La, oda(
(Number & Street)
Wad k r-
Art_ •Cdet- VSPr
(City)
(Last)
Address: I7(0 pic(Of.
1_10104 -c„ -.(it
First)
fil.44i4 Oris
5-57(r
(Number & Street)
Street Location of Property in Question: 176 0
(City)
(State) (Zip)
p./q/ go/
Legal Description of Property: 5,2 e 01.46-t.,491
e .
Type of Request:
Rezoning
Conditional Use Permit
Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D.
- Plan Approval
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Applicable City Ordinance Number
Variance
Subdivision Approval
Wetlands Permit
Other (attach explanation)
Present Zoning of Property i- ( Present Use
Section
d4h (e. c(ix..4117)
Proposed Zoning of Property ProposedUse S 0. e
r 4;41
5 -
I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on
material are true.
dditional
(Signature 0
App cant)
• (Date)
. _
--,:-7-(Received by - Title) -.
•
City of
Mendota Heights
October 30, 1991
Mr. Peter Knaeble
6001 Glenwood Avenue
Golden Valley, MN 55422
Dear Mr. Knaeble:
Your application for a Subdivision will be considered by the City
Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be
held on Tuesday, November 5, 1991. The Council meeting starts at
7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You,
or a representative should plan on attending the meeting in order
that your application will receive Council consideration The
Planning Commission recommended 5-0 that City Council grant
approval of the Wetlands Permit and to approve the preliminary plat
conditioned upon Outlot A being combined with the property to the
south.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
CL LLQ
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
cc: Ms. Gretchen- Nordstrom-Aherns
-Burnet Realty
1994 South -Robert Street
..,.. •,- West St. Paul, NN 55118 ,..'
Enclosures: , - ::CityCounci1PAgexidacv-1-,'"--,:-
- -- ' - '- Staff:Hemo4:*to;':C.ityCoupci1'-
..,., . _
,.., .: •
..,,,,,,„....,,,,,,,p-4
.-' • , ,/,• 1^.. t. . 4'.•.f...,,-.
h •
llfictoriwk
aT.
4,Z--g4S'V..:7341.=Y4d.e&55:je.141:1
- •r, :
". •
AA AA IA
city of
Mendota Heights
September 27, 1991
Mr. Peter Knaeble
6001 Glenwood Avenue
Golden Valley, MN 55422
Dear Mr. Knaeble:
The Planning Commission continued the public
requested subdivision until their October 22,
Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 0'
the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You,
should plan on attending the meeting,
hearing on your
1991 meeting. The
clock P.M., here at
or a representative
in order that your
application will receive Commission consideration.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant'.
KLB:mlk
1101 Victoria -,,Curve:: -.Mendota Heights,
City of
Mendota Heights
October 17, 1991
Mr. Peter Knaeble
6001 Glenwood Avenue
Golden Valley, MN 55422
Dear Mr. Knaeble:
Your application for a Subdivision will be reconsidered by the
Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting,
which will be held on Tuesday, October 22, 1991. The Planning
Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City
Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan
on attending the meeting, in order that your application will
receive Commission consideration.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
cexIA;--
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:mlk
Enclosures: Planning Commission Agenda
Planner's Report
City Staff Report
1101. Victoria,Curve -1Viendota;Beights,VANr, 5511824,4452-1850 452.1850:
1
DIA
City of
Mendota Heights
September 19, 1991
Mr. Peter Knaeble
6001 Glenwood Avenue
Golden Valley, MN 55422
Dear Mr. Knaeble:
Your application for a Subdivision will be considered by the
Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting,
which will be held on Tuesday, September 24, 1991. The Planning
Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City
Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan
on attending the meeting, in order that your application will
receive Commission consideration.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Iltut;.)'coir_A9_10Lok,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant..
KLB:mlk
Enclosures: Planning Commission Agenda
Planner's Report
City Staff Report
1101 Victoriaurve..Mendota Heights; AIN -11;551184i=' :-452.1850
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
NOTICE OF HEARING
September 4, 1991
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of
Mendota Heights will meet at 8:00 o'clock P.M., or as soon as
possible thereafter, on Tuesday, September 24, 1991, in the City
Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights,
Minnesota, to consider an application from Mr. Peter Knaeble for
a Preliminary Plat/Subdivision and Wetlands Permit at the
following described property:
That part of Lot 49, Auditor's Subdivision No. 3, Mendota described
' as follows: Commenting at the intersection of the North line of Lot 49,
'.Auditor's Sub.No.3, Mendota, andthe Easterly line of Jefferson Hwy.,
c thence east on said north line 770.47,feet thence South at 90° angle 180
' feet, thence West`parallel with t$e North line of Lot 49, 500.94.feet,
thence North 402feet, thence West parallel with North line of Lot.49,
310 feet to the Easterly line of Jefferson Hwy., thence Northeasterly along
said line 140.5 feet to place of beginning. -
More particulary, this property is located at 1760 Dodd
Road.
This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance
No. 301 and No. 402. Such persons as desire to be heard with
reference to the proposed Preliminary Plat/Subdivision and
Wetlands Permit will be heard at this meeting.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
• WV
. •
t • • ••••••• • rt. ••••••••• p ••• ••••• • OM...". ••••••• •• .1•••• •••• ••• • •
An that part of Lot Forty-nine (49),...Auditorts,SubdiVision NO.,3jWndotiOidaording:tofihe.
plat thereof on file.:and,Ofreord.#i".the office of the'pet4;sterof:,Deetielift,4*.rfOr '
count, MinnesO*, described 'd CoimienCipeat,alpoint'OhltCeiFistrli,
Hof Jefferson:Highway One.hundredfotir-fiVe and 00 (145..8). feet:SOuthwesterlfrO44he
NOthWest corner of said Lot Forty-hine (49), thence running East:parallel.with theqlorth
%linf.of said Lot forty-nine (49),-a distance of:three*ndred:tenj310) feet,:_thenae'South
at right angles with.said last described linei•a distance of FortY..(40).feet;thencetasi
paialle/ with the North line of said Lot forty-nine.(49),:five hundred and 94400 .(500.94)
4tvast.„.tbence South'at'right angles with said last described line a':gstance
3/10 (903) :fee, theilee west paraliel.to'the North line �f said Dot forty-nine'W),:eight
'hundred sixty-five'and.*/10'(86.5:2):,feet to a paint.on:the Easterly line of Jefferson
Hgh-
way, thence'Northeasterly'alcing.the' Easterly line.of Jefferson Highway to the point of
:::beginning, including any portion of:any street or:alley ad.jacent.thereto,,vaaated or.to.be
••
. • ii&Ir '
•
•
• vacated
4.00.10
4.0,•••••••....
•
4
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis
FROM: James E. Daniel
Public Works Dir
October 28, 1991
SUBJECT: Ivy Falls Creek Improvement - Phase I (Brassard)
Job No. 8814A
DISCUSSION:
During the preparation of the plans for the Ivy Falls Creek
Improvements adjacent to the Brassard residence it was discovered that
the creek generally follows rear lot lines. The lots on the south
side (the side Mr. Brassard is on) have a twenty (20) foot wide plat-•
ted easement for the creek. The lots on the north side were created
in an earlier plat and have no easements. In order to complete all
the creek work in Phases I and II, easements will need to be acquired
from all the homes on the north. Right now in order to do any work on
Phase I, an easement from the lot north of Mr. Brassard will be need-
ed.
The lot north of Mr. Brassard is owned by Dr. Francis Denis. Dr.
Denis is generally not in favor of the project and specifically does
not want the creek to be realigned through a portion of his property.
He also does not want any of his trees removed,
however Dr. Denis has said that he would consider signing an easement
under the following conditions:
1. The creek is improved along its existing alignment.
2. None of his trees are removed.
3. Satisfactory compensation be paid him for the easement.
My response to each of his requests are as follows:
1. The creek can be improved along the existing alignment
however, it will increase the costs an estimated $10,000 and
the City will lose the benefits gained by straightening the
creek (less chance for erosion).
2. All of Dr. Denis' trees can be saved, however, one of Mr.
Brassard's greatest concerns was that the large cottonwood
tree located at the bend in the creek was badly undermined
and could fall on his house.
3. The minimum amount of easement area needed from Dr. Denis is
2,600 square feet. Consistent with our past practice, I
told him that I felt $0.25 per square foot ($650) would be a
fair price for the easement. Dr. Denis said that $650 was
too low. He is currently investigating a counter offer.
Note: The City needs to keep in mind that there will be at least
five (5) other future easements that will need to be
acquired from Dr. Denis' neighbors downstream as part
of the Phase II project (whatever we pay him will set a'
precedent). If we can not come to terms with Dr. Denis
and decide to condemn his easement we should then
acquire all the easements at the same time (economy of
numbers).
ACTION REOUIRED:
As of this time I do not have a counter offer back from Dr. Denis
however, I am forwarding this memo to keep Council informed of the
progress and gain direction on this somewhat difficult negotiation.
JED:dfw
•
•
01
b
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis
SUBJECT: Discuss 1992 CDBG Allocation
October 31, 1991
INTRODUCTION
At the September 17, 1991 meeting, the City Council
preliminarily discussed the subject of Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) Funding for 1992. The Council offered a number of
suggestions for uses of the allocation, and asked staff to further
explore these possibilities.
DISCUSSION
Attached please find a letter from the Dakota County Housing
and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) which addresses several of the
options Council discussed. It appears we have at least two viable
ideas from which to choose.
1.
2.
Senior Housing Development
We were encouraged to learn from the HRA that they intend
to pursue the acquisition of land within Mendota Heights
for such development in 1992. In speaking with
representatives from the HRA, they were likewise pleased
to learn of our interest in senior housing. Other such
projects undertaken in the County have utilized CDBG
Funds for land acquisition, and despite the timing
concerns raised in their letter, the HRA is confident we
can utilize CDBG Funds for this purpose in 1992 if we so
desire.
Housing Rehabilitation
Council had suggested we explore a financial allocation
to assist in the rehabilitation of deteriorated homes
within the community. Assuming the owner/occupant meets
the income restrictions of the CDBG Program, this type of
housing improvement activity would be eligible •for
funding. In very severe cases, the City could also use
CDBG Funds to acquire and demolish blighted properties.
3. Water Utility Looping
Council had suggested we explore the use of CDBG Funds to
finance the cost of water looping in the Beebe area.
This expenditure was discussed with HRA staff and it was
concluded it would be very difficult to justify the use
of CDBG Funds for this project. It is not likely the low
to moderate income restrictions could be met in this
area, and unless the problem represents a community
catastrophe with no other funding source available to
address it, the expenditure would not be allowed.
Similar to years past, the City's 1992 CDBG allocation is
expected to be approximately $50,000. The City must submit its
1992 CDBG application to the HRA by December 15, 1991. Thus it is
our intention to have the completed application before the Council
at our December 3rd meeting for final approval.
ACTION REOUIRED
Council should discuss its desired use of CDBG Funds in 1992
to give staff direction in preparing the required funding
application.
MTL:kkb
Attachment
i")TA COUNTY
October 18, 1991
Mr. Thomas Lawell
Mendota Heights City Hall
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
RE: CDBG Program
Dear Mr. Lawell:
Housing & Redevelopment Authority 612-423-4800
2496 -145th St. W. • Rosemount, MN 55068 • T.D.D. 612-423-8182 • FAX 612-423-8180
A few weeks ago Jim Danielson, your City Engineer, called me with
some questions about various proposals for the 1992 Dakota County
Community Development Block Grant Program. I am writing in
response to those questions.
Apparently there is some interest by the Mendota Heights City
Council in Dakota County's Senior Housing Development Program.
When ;the County established the Program, a ten-year Capital
Improvement Plan was drawn up, covering the proposed senior housing
developments. This plan was largely based on an extensive needs
assessment study commissioned by Dakota County HRA. Mendota
Heights was included in this plan, with land acquisition proposed
for 1992 or 1993, and construction of a 40 -unit building in 1997.
CDBG funds can play an important role in the development of senior
housing as an acquisition funding source. Therefore it would be
appropriate for the City to apply for funding to acquire a site for
senior' housing at some point in time. The only potential problem
in doing so at this time is that if CDBG funds are expended one of
the federal objectives of the program must be met within a
reasonable period of time after the expenditure. The acquisition
of a site for senior housing would meet the objective of
benefitting low and moderate income persons, but only when the
housing was actually constructed. If several years pass between
site acquisition and project construction, it could result in a
finding of non-compliance being issued by the Department of Housing
and Urban Development.
Another project mentioned by Mr. Danielson involved targeting
substandard or problem homes in the City for rehabilitation
funding. This type of project would be feasible, provided that the
"AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER",
property was owned and occupied by persons of low or moderate
income who were willing to apply for and accept assistance. There
would be no restriction preventing the City from referring
individuals to the available assistance or encouraging them to
apply.
We currently have three parties on a waiting list for housing
rehabilitation and have had inquiries from several others,
primarily residents of the Furlong area who had received assessment
abatement assistance.
If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 423-8113.
Sincerely,0
Lee Smith
Community Development Supervisor
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 31, 1991
To: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis
From: James Danielson, Public Works Di
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative As
Subject: Zoning Administration and Policies
INTRODUCTION
On August 21, 1991 the new Zoning Ordinance went into effect
upon summary publication in the Sun -Current. Now that staff is
beginning to operate under the new ordinances, it is becoming
evident that certain procedural policies need to be changed or
reaffirmed. The purpose of this memorandum is to propose a set of
new procedural requirements for Council approval and to seek policy
direction from City Council on the administration of certain zoning
and subdivision issues.
DISCUSSION
1. Procedural Requirements
When the 1979 Zoning Ordinance was adopted, a set of written
procedural requirements for processing planning applications was
approved by City Council. Since that time, staff has handled
planning applications according to those requirements. Those
requirements now need to be amended to coincide with the recently
adopted 1991 Zoning Ordinance.
Attached is a proposed "Procedural Requirements for Planning
Applications" dated October 31, 1991. It has been modified to
coincide with our new public hearing notice requirements, otherwise
it remains the same. (See attached September 4, 1991 memo.) State
statutes regarding public hearing notices have changed since our
old procedural requirements policies were adopted. Our new zoning
ordinance is consistent with state law and the proposed Procedural
Requirements for Planning Applications is consistent with the new
Zoning Ordinance.
4
2. Final Platting
The City Council should note that the proposed "Procedural
Requirements for Planning Applications" also addresses Subdivision
requirements. Of particular concern is the Final Platting
procedures that state: "May be referred to Planning Commission for
review." The Subdivision Ordinance, Section 3.2(1) differs from
this policy and states that Final Plats are to receive review at
the Planning Commission level.
To our knowledge, the City has never processed Final Plats
through the Planning Commission, despite the language in the
Subdivision Ordinance. Final Plats have always proceeded directly
to City Council on their consent agenda. In adopting the new
"Procedural Requirements for Planning Applications", City Council
should consider reaffirming this past practice and readopting this
procedure as policy.
This particular matter on Final Plats is being brought to your
attention because Commissioner Friel, in a letter to the Planning
Commission and staff over his concern about Bridgeview Shores Third
Addition, brought the differences in planning procedures and
ordinance language to our attention. (See attached letter dated
October 17, 1991.)
3. New Side Yard Setbacks in R-1
The new side yard setback requirement for the R-1 Zoning
District essentially makes many existing single family homes in
Mendota Heights legal non -conforming structures. The new Side Yard
requirement states: " 10 feet on each side or 1/2 of the height of
the structure contiguous to the side yard, whichever is greater, to
a maximum of 15 feet."
Any home built at the legal 10 foot side yard setback
requirement under the old ordinance, where the height provision
under the new ordinance would require a greater setback becomes a
legal, non -conforming structure. Current policy dictates that, as
legal, non -conforming structures, they would need side yard
variances to make them conforming structures prior to any issuance
of building permits for additions, enlargements and certain
structural improvements.
Past practice has been to process legal, non -conforming
structures as "housekeeping variances" before a building permit is
issued. (Please see attached Non -Conforming Ordinance Clauses.)
In many cases, the non -conforming feature is not related to the
building permit being requested. For instance, an existing house
may not meet the side yard setback requirement, making the
structure legal, non -conforming. A 3 season porch addition to the
rear of this house may not be related at all to the non -conforming
r
feature.
We are proposing that the City establish a policy to require
"housekeeping" variances only in cases where the non -conforming
feature is proposed to be extended or intensified in R-1 Zoning
Districts, or at the request of the applicant. This would allow
single family home owners to process building permits for additions
without requiring a variance because of an existing 10 foot side
yard setback. It would also eliminate the need for many
"housekeeping" variances that are not related to proposals for
additions, etc.
ACTION
REOUIRED
If the City Council so desires, they should pass motions:
1. Adopting the "Procedural Requirements for Planning
Applications" dated October 31, 1991. This motion would
reaffirm the final platting procedures currently being
followed.
2. Establishing a variance policy, in the R-1 District, that
equi
rres "housekeeping" variances only in cases where the non-
conforming feature is proposed to be extended or intensified.
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT
Ord. 401, Sec. 5.6
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT, PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Ord. 401, Sec. 22
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT OR PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT
AMENDMENT
Ord. 401, Sec. 5.6
REZONING
Ord. 401, Sec. 5.7
PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS
FOR PLANNING APPLICATIONS
OCTOBER 31, 1991
Planning
commission
Public Hearing on 10 day notice
without required signatures.
Motion to recommend approval or
denial.
Public Hearing on 10 day mailed
and published notice.
Motion to recommend approval or
denial.
Public Hearing 10 day mailed and
published notice. On preliminary
development plan, motion to
recommend approval or denial.
Same public hearing provisions
CUP or PUD.
City
Council
Motion to approve
or deny.
Resolution to
approve or deny
Resolution to
approve or deny
Review and
approval of
final development
plan
as original
Public hearing on 10 day mailed
and published notice. Motion
to recommend approval or denial.
ZONING ORDINANCE Public hearing on 10 days
(OR MAP) AMENDMENT published notice. Ten days
Ord. 401, Sec. 5.8 mailed notice if less than
5 acres.
SUBDIVISION - Public hearing on preliminary
PRELIMINARY PLAT plat, 10 days mailed and
Ord. 301, Sec. 3.1 published notice.
FINAL PLAT May be referred to Commission
Ord. 301, Sec. 3.2 for review.
Motion to deny.
Ordinance amending
Zoning Ordinance
required for
approval.
Motion to deny.
Ordinance amending
Zoning Ordinance
required for
approval.
No public hearing
requirement.
Motion to approve
or deny.
Motion to deny.
Resolution to
approve.
'ISION OF
. ISTING PLATTED
LOT
Ord. 301, Sec
Applicant may be exempted from inappropriate Ordinance
requirements by official bodies. This may include
waiver of hearing required for platting.
11.3
VACATION OF STREET
OR ALLEY
Ord. 302
WETLANDS PERMIT
Ord. 402, Sec. 8c
r 'TICAL AREA
Public hearing on 10 day mailed
and published notice.
Motion to recommend approval
or denial.
Single Family - Exemption of
inappropriate requirements and
waiver of public hearing when
signatures of consent are
provided.
APPLICATIONS
SITE PLAN REVIEW
Ord. 403, Sec. 2
Public hearing on 10 day mailed
and published notice.
Motion to recommend approval or
denial.
VARIANCE Motion to recommend approval or
Ord. 403, Sec. 5 denial.
MODIFIED SITE PLAN
(Change in existing
singe family dwelling)
Ord. 403, Sec. 2.3c
Public hearing
on two weeks
published and
posted notice.
Motion to deny.
Resolution to
approve.
Public hearing
10 day mailed
and published
notice.
Resolution to
approve.
Public hearing on
5 day mailed
notice.
Motion to approve
or deny.
Motion to approve
or deny.
Motion to approve
or deny. Council
may exempt Ord.
applicant from any
inappropriate
Critical Area
Ordinance
requirements.
To:
From:
Subject:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
September 4, 1991
Everyone Concerned with Planning Cases
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist4.:1)
Public Hearing Notice Requirements �
DISCUSSION
On August 21, 1991, the new Zoning Ordinance went into effect
with the publication of the summary in the official city news
outlet, the Sun -Current. Some of the public hearing requirements
have changed and state law has some requirements beyond our
ordinance. The following guidelines need to be followed to be
consistent with State law and with our Zoning Ordinance:
Planning
Comp Plan 10 days published
Amendment
Rezoning 10 days published
and mailed
Zoning Code
Amendment
Conditional Use
Permits
CUP for PUD
Subdivision
Critical Area
Wetlands Permit
Variances
10 days published
10 days mailed if less
than 5 acres
Council
None
None
None
10 days published None
and mailed
10 days published
and mailed
10 day published
and mailed
10 day published
and mailed
10 day published
and mailed
None
None
5 day mailed
10 day published
and mailed
10 day mailed None
LAW OFFICES
BRIGGS AND MORGAN
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
(612) 223-6422
Mr. Jim Danielson
Mendota Heights City
City Hall
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendot Heights, MN
Dear Jim:
TELEPHONE (612) 223 -6600
FACSIMILE (612) 223 -6450
October 17, 1991
Engineer
55118
MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE
2400 IDS CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 85402
TELEPHONE (812) 034-8400
FACSIMILE (612) 034-8680
When I was doing some research in our Ordinances, I noted that
the subdivision ordinance seems to clearly require that Final Plats
be approved by both the Planning Commission and the City Council.
I was surprised to find those requirements of the ordinance for I
know that the final plat for the Bridgeview Shores Third Addition
was never presented to the Planning Commission. The language to
which I refer is contained in Section 3.2 of the subdivision
ordinance, and more particularly in 3.2(1).
Perhaps there is something that I am overlooking and if there
is, I shall appreciate your advice.
As you know, I have also raised with you questions about
Bridgeview Shores in connection with two sections of the zoning
ordinance, namely 4.12, relating to land reclamation, and 4.13,
relating to mining. In addition, the definition section 3.2(81) is
relevant in connection with the mining provision.
It is my view that the correct interpretation of Sections 4.12
and 4.13 requires that developers such as Mary Anderson in the
Bridgeview Shores Third Addition are required to get Conditional
Use Permits for both filling (land reclamation) under section 4.12
of the zoning ordinance, and for mining under section 4.13 of the
ordinance. It is clear that in the case of Bridgeview Shores, more
than 400 cubic yards have been mined and more than 400 cubic yards
have been used for filling.
210745
BRIGGS AND MORGAN
Mr. Jim Danielson
October 17, 1991
Page 2
It has been suggested to me that an exception in the
definition section of the Ordinance permits the mining in question
to be done without a Conditional Use Permit. The exception that
apparently is looked to to reach that conclusion is contained in
section 3.2(81). That section reads as follows:
Mining: The extraction of sand, gravel, rock,
soil or other material from the land in the
amount of -400 .cubic -yards or more and the
removal from the site, except grading and/or
excavation in .connection with an approved
development or building plan for which permits
have been issued by the City Council.
It is the exception language in the definition that is relied
upon. However, I do not believe that the exception language
applies to the Bridgeview Shores Addition because the exception
deals only with sites with respect to which there is an "approved
development plan" for which a "permit has been issued by the
Council" or an "approved building plan" for which a "permit has
been issued by the Council". The only provision of the ordinance
in which I find any reference to a "development plan" is with
respect to PUDs. Obviously the Mary Anderson development is not a
PUD. Furthermore, I am unaware of any "building plan" for which a
permit has been issued by the City Council with respect to the Mary
Anderson project.
Again if there is some matter that I am overlooking, I would
certainly appreciate your advice and direction.
One other matter I believe should not be overlooked in
connection frith the Mary Anderson Bridgeview • Shores Third Addition
is theApparent. disagreement over the location of the Mary Anderson
northerly boundary line. At this point I have had no response from
Mary Anderson to the letter which I sent to him, a copy of which
was provided to you. While I understand that boundary line
disputes are private matters between the abutting owners, those
private issues do rise to the dignity of public concern when they
involve plats that may include dimensions which reference an
erroneous boundary line, for eventually that will create problems
for the developer and subsequent owners of the property in relation
to meeting lot area requirements and setbacks. It seems to me that
if the City does not make sure that those issues are resolved
before building permits are issued, that it may find that it will
210745
2
4• L
BRIGGS
.A.Nn MORGAN
Mr. Jim Danielson
October 17, 1991
Page 3
become involved in any future controversy about the location of the
boundary line.
Because the foregoing matters involve questions which may give
rise to proposals to amend city ordinances, I am sending a copy of
this letter to the Chairman of the Planning Commission and to the
Mayor, and by the copy I am sending to the Chairman of the Planning
Commission, I am asking that he put on the agenda for discussion
next Tuesday evening the questions I have raised regarding the
final plat and the mining and land reclamation matters.
BPF/vm
cc: Charles Mertensotto
Michael Dwyer
210745
Very truly yours,
Bernard P. Friel
3
3.2 (141)
4.3 (1)
4.3(9)
NON -CONFORMING ORDINANCE CLAUSES
Structure, Non -Conforming: A structure which is
legally existing upon the effective date of this
Ordinance, which would not conform to the
applicable regulations if the structure were to be
erected under the provisions of this Ordinance.
Any structure or use lawfully existing upon the
effective date of this Ordinance may be continued
at the size and in a manner of operation existing
upon such date except as hereinafter specified.
Normal maintenance of a building or other structure
containing or related to a lawful non -conforming
use is permitted, including necessary non-
structural repairs and incidental alterations which
do not extend or intensify the non -conforming use.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 31, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administi
SUBJECT: Legislative Policies for 1992
INTRODUCTION
As a member City of the Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities (AMM) and the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC),
these two organizations represent our interests at the State
Capitol. The next Legislative Session begins January 6, 1992, and
both organizations are currently asking their membership to endorse
the policy packages they will advocate during the upcoming Session.
BACKGROUND
As part of the October 15, 1991, City Council packet, a copy
of the AMM Policy packet was distributed. Please bring this
document with you to the November 5th Council meeting, if you still
have it. If not, please let me know and an additional copy will be
made available that night.
Attached to this memo, please find a copy of the LMC proposed
policies and priorities. As you will see, the LMC Policies in many
ways mirror those of the AMM, except in those instances where
metropolitan and out state interests significantly diverge.
The AMM Policy Adoption Meeting is set for Thursday evening,
November 7th in Brooklyn Park, and the LMC Policy Adoption Meeting
is set for Thursday morning, November 21st in Bloomington.
Councilmembers are invited to attend these meetings if you are so
interested.
DISCUSSION
The AMM Policy package asks each City to identify their top
five policy priorities for the year. Staff has reviewed the ninety
plus proposed policies and feels the most important issues involve
Municipal Revenue and Transportation. Policies of particular
concern are as follows:
Policy I - A. Levy Limits (see page 1)
Despite the push for greater local accountability for property
taxes, the State continues to impose arbitrary property tax "levy
limits" on units of local government. In years past Legislators
have pledged to remove these limits at a specified future date,
which always seems to come and go with no action. Currently levy
limits are scheduled to sunset for taxes payable in 1993, and the
AMM encourages adherence to this date.
Policy I - B. Mandated State and Federal Procrrams (see page 1)
Many items in our annual City Budget can be traced back to
various State requirements which were enacted in previous
legislative sessions. This policy points out the tremendous cost
that such mandates cause within units of local government, and
recommends that any new mandates be accompanied with new funding to
carry them out.
Policy I - C. Local Government Aid (see page 2)
Although entitled "local government aid", this policy also
addresses Homestead Credit, Disparity Reduction Aid and the new
Local Government Trust Fund (LGTF). The distribution of the new
LGTF Two Cent Sales Tax is sure to be a topic of hot debate in the
near future. The AMM Policy sets forth a list of criteria it would
like to see applied in distributing the tax in the long run, and
suggests that the tax be distributed on the basis of household
count and/or population in the interim.
Policy V - F. Highway Jurisdictional Reassignment, Turnback and
Funding (see page 52)
There is currently an effort underway to reassign to Cities
the jurisdiction over many State and County highways within
Minnesota. With the only condition that the road be in "good
condition", the City has no authority to refuse the gift from the
other unit of government. Within Mendota Heights this turnback
procedure could affect a number of roads in the future, including
Highway 110, Dodd Road, Victoria, Lexington and a portion of Pilot
Knob Road. The AMM Policy supports the turnback program, but only
if accompanied by an adequate funding mechanism to maintain the
bequeathed roadways.
Policy V - G. Transportation Utility (see page 52)
As more and more Cities attempt to deal with the replacement
and repair of aging streets, the issue of infrastructure funding
will become increasingly important. The traditional 429 Special
Assessment Procedure is not adequate to effectively address the
problem, and in this policy, the AMM proposes an' alternative
funding mechanism. The availability of this new approach could be
of great assistance to Mendota Heights as we address our road
reconstruction issues.
Certainly there are dozens of other policies within the
package which have implications to Mendota Heights. Should Council
wish to include others among our top five, please feel free to
suggest them at the meeting.
ACTION REQUIRED
Discuss the proposed 1992 AMM Legislative Policies and select
five which have the greatest priority for Mendota Heights. Also,
please let me now if you would like to registered to attend either
the November 7th AMM meeting and/or the November 21st LMC meeting.
MTL:kkb
Attachment
i-)
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November 5, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Direc
SUBJECT: "Storm of the Century" Follow Up
DISCUSSION
The snow "storm of the century" began with the final amounts
of snow reaching about 30 inches when it was all over. (We even
got another 3 inches today). Combine this with the fact that the
snow was extra wet and heavy and the high winds, this snow fall
posed major problems for our public works crews who had to remove
it all.
Public Works began plowing Thursday night at 12:00 A.M., it
was still snowing heavily. Those areas that were plowed first had
plenty of snow back on the streets by the time we finished going
over all the streets late Friday evening. After working 20 1/2
hours straight, everyone but one Public Works employee went home at
about 8:30 Friday evening for some food and a nap. They began
returning at midnight, 3 1/2 hours later to start again. They then
continued to work in shifts with someone always in the City working
continuously until Sunday evening when they all went home for a
long break.
During the storm there were lots of calls at City Hall with
most of them being fairly reasonable once 'we explained the
situation and approximately when we would get to their street.
Some of the problems we encountered were:
1.`, There are three main line routes with a five ton truck
with a plow and wing mounted for each route. The road
grader can also plow snow and is normally used as a back
up (see attached map for routes) . When the snow hit, one
of the trucks had our "hot box" mounted on it and could
not be used for plowing, we had to use the road grader
for plowing from the beginning.
2. Mid-morning Friday, the heavy snow broke a 2 1/2"
diameter pin on one of the plows. That truck was down
for approximately 1 1/2 hours while we exchanged plows
with the one used on the hot box truck. '
3. We normally use three pickups to plow our 90 plus cul-de-
sacs. The hydraulics went out on one pickup and we were
left with only two to do the cul-de-sacs.
4. We jumped around some to help some doctors and a pregnant
lady get out early.
5. We were two men short on Thursday, one was sick and one
had quit (we are currently advertising to replace him).
6. Due to some missed communications, we missed plowing
Dodge Lane (the bosses street, how could we?) and
Glenhill Road and Culligan Lane.
ANALYSIS
We feel that the public works crew did an outstanding job,
utilizing the resources available to them, working extremely long
hours under adverse conditions to make the streets safe for travel
in as early a time as possible.
There are 21 miles of street per route, which is extremely
long. When we hire the new maintenance worker that is budgeted for
1992, we intend to add a fourth route. We will then utilize all
the snow removal equipment that the City has available immediately,
by using the road grader for that fourth route. This should
decrease the time required to remove snow.
ACTION REQUIRED
For your information/comment only.
JED:kkb
ROUTE 1 - Dump truck. Driver plus
wing operator
ROUTE 2 - Dump truck. Driver plus
wing operator
ROUTE 3 - Dump truck. Driver plus
wing operator
Cul=de-sacs (90) plowed with three
pickup trucks
PEDWAYS - Next day (or as soon as
possible)
PARKS (Rinks & Drives) - Next day
(or as soon as possible)
I. FREMONT AVE.
2. GARDEN LA.
3. HIAWATHA AVE.
4. SIVARO ST.
E. S. VIRIAU ST.
G JUNCTION LA.
T. JOHN ST.
AVE. S. ESTHIER LA.
Pike Island
FORT SNELLING
STATE PARK
MENDOTA .
1980 POP. 219
wiwurCORIA ,1
�/'Yi/ t �n FRONT i[snypya CT.
�G., f. h,.•Sv "i2a o nnn^w"vw' •�.-fk_,n5vti�ti;:,n::�:�.
:�'t^"� `�y .:.•.Vh..r. .'vtiv�n V1N. ,� .... ..- .•r ::�S7c 7S 'C: )47}}7.7}} :4S'}.x s ..: .� 1:
IW �Y „ a. N NARY ,oE4E PYA•
M_ENDOTA HEIGHTS
i ` • ER ro�E -�� = y •
S. A 1980 POP. 7288
OHM a.
�j�t•� I. MM OHM
..
CREEK '' AVE. i 00111 rot OIL
1. HOgllp WO.
1. MP /IINI a.
O. POO Ola a.
1. POO tag
111.1•111114
e
aaa
V. CT.
v.
IC PM a161 O.
VAN 1331
314
AI 3
TRAM AVE.
a
�
0
A
I \ �
' F � � �k
. LJ
i
� Q
' ; N
�
, � .,
� 9'
�, is r �
; ��
�
I . �.: � 2
� ti
�' � i'—' 9bf o �
� � � i , 2 .
y , , u �
q
Yt �` ` 6
mA � . � �
i �. � �
•`� Y
� ' I •j O `2 V "�Y
' I ' ...I , � C \
� � i V ��
� � � 3
I • -- ` ' �� .����-;.:',"��� 9 i
` 'f �<�` 5 d
�- •�4 y � . � a
• � . . . �,1i W V
4,r�� � �.y✓� . ��. 1 Q
1
�� ., �. ,l.! � �
- ' ' sr' :� o -- -' 3
i I ..�';1 '----:y�i h 5
I � : ��3.�.d � �c
.� � L i
�. A f"Qe• � ``r �l
� o
� �•� . ,� � �h�
s I ��
��
�� :� i
oe,. � I��
o� '� I 1
t�' �-- ��oP �:;
�
� ^�l 3{� gpV".�i� $J" �. 9f )r : , . . _ .
d{
'. � �t1,��fA,yS""� �y.Y�'T��i� V r W:.' ��- . � I� 1 ! . . � - /� ' h _ '.
J I t .
�r�� �� �i�.4.e.'�ro � n �7 f. . . 1��'� . � t( t��I . . . � . . � - 8'O„ - . � �.t�.
: �' $Y�, �r.'� i � I � iI . I ' �� � � .f 'P�e � � __
, �� Tr� Yf.i 'a`� � _ . �I+ . : _ ..�". --...'• ; ����t� �1-... . �. ���� - � �2'-9" S 3-�� � .
F. t ' ! \41 �
j ,� , � ,,�: . . . , -.. . il t' ' � � �; �z r/ -- — ,
, . ,"""„i;,: r < � 'r / �
- ' .. - . � . . . ;. ����� �. .J� u —
. . ..� � -•" --�:,. \ � � �" � �w �' � .. . . . ..
. _ � , �� �: - � :p - .
. � . . � � � . \�� . �- ^ C% � I4! , � . � -o �� . , .
_.
. ". .. ' . . . . , . - " � � � .
:
: _ �. ___' .. " __" .__ .__ ._ _ _. - � ' . � �' �; '� . . , + . . .. . _
� -� � . � � ':f ., .. �'�'
., ' . . ; . �. � ' . , _. . . -..' . - .. _- .,, . '.. - � I � --. �-_ - �._ � .
��
I � � L1 G �
� � � � I ,� _ , , .�
� � } I '�v i j� 3( '
, . � • '
. 1 � 9 V�t l � Y �! � .
. .. . -. . . � .I � � . � ' �� � � ' ... - ` .
I , . . � � �� � � ��ni}��1i � � _�
- _ �i�, . .. � � � . � . . - � � (�� i li�v� - -Y )� .- i�,,. ��1 ,�J � . ..�
� I ' � I. .I. i' �' � . � �,i � _- �� a T
� ~ ��i::. ,�y I _ �;i —G �`�' -_—�(i- io .
�i�i;; , - � � ;� �,. , � v " a �
, , , l �'-� i ; ,,i �}j!� + �. ,� � � _ �,
ti;•� i � � � �. � � ;
I����i�,:��i���j�, f ��� � I �! � i;� z.; �, �`
, � �i�, � ,�. i � ; •- �; �
�.�; �i'� �, ?ij ;. ( . ' ;; � `� �;
� � �!' � � � � �, �
� � z � y �
� ; i; �` � I
�' . i � I; _ �r � s �.
. . . . . .�� � irV � ' '- _ �—`— � r:c-- — �. . . ,-.. �� i . .
! ���
�, � � 3''O ' . i . . � L �-.���—� � r^ .
� z � � �k � -
, i �� �
_ � ; � , ���
- - ' - __- � �" , � �N �` ��'��� � i � ! �i � �
�. -
- _ _ r � e � � �I ;. '� �� f` � � '
i °� ' � � � " ,' , ; �1
i
4 _ -, : �
,
� rt
�.� � � ' � �NI - ° �= `' - I�
� '
p y'r `\ r w —�, �; � �--- ��
� r : r,
. . .. 7-p` ...2:-�, .
, %. �, 3 � -- --
�, G _ � �!------!
_ P z' N
y
n z
Z 7o a �
� a P F
, �
� fi
� �
�a a
q
� '� _
. . . y ry -. _ . ..
. . . f1 V ... .. .
. . . . . . . . . � � � . . . .
. . . - . . . . � � . . . g "O . . ' . � .- ,.. . .
. . . . .� "__ _'.__ _'�� . � .
� . . . � �- _ _ _ __ . ' _
� . . . . . . . . . : . - . �I r . . . � � �
'
— i —
• .. . ' . . . , ' . . . . . " - � . . . . _ . I � I i _ _ � I . ' . . . . .
. . . .' - , I . � � • . .
� o- .
, - I � i � �ro . � �.- .
I �. � � , �.�s.. i -
� . � , � - _ � -
� ;� � ; r �� ,��
` I ; c F. E . 0 1
i i ���. r :,b t .�� f i
� � . _ � .. � . . ' � � .. .. � i�i , I + � i � .!C � � . , .� .. �.
� � � �
. . .. � . -, . . . . i ' � �v ; r t . ,
� . . � _ . - - . � . �. - . � .
� . � . . . � . � .- `�_ . . . -. . . . - �L'. . it �� I: �. � z•IJJsr y i � .
� - . ' .. �- . . � � '. . /C'"OC, � . � � . .
. � 4 I I \ � . i �. .� " - .
v
� , � 1 , ' ' �- �
��I } . '— — — b' �
. � � � ` � �
� � I I �— i � ' _� � � �
,�
1; I I 3=0 < � 2`�.
� � . . . �� � L�=-�-�' � `�� � . . ; , r- ---I � 3 . : ` .. � .
n
_ - . .. . . , . . . . - . . i � ` . .I � � . . � � .- � � IH . F . . �.�N n D �� � - .
.. _ ' � - - � � � . . : �- - . � . . ��fu. . ! I �� Io" ��� r � .. � � �
i � � . ! r. �` °O
_ . . - . .. . n . . � .. - . . � , . r �
- � : . . � . � � � — 7;0: I P � .
� �� �� � � I �
�. i111( . . �. : � o �� 2
''pp�� Q
. . ���i�'I�i�[f .� � �� ��� � . . � .
. . ❑.� . '. . . � G � � � . , . �
r �
� \ c �c ' � � r-
�. i
f�}j�i�rit{
i �I I t ' lt`. • 6 N N � � L � . ' � . . .
. + . '�;!��i� �' . f �� r,� ' N ~��� �3�� � -
� 1 I� .. . . �i"� i1il�ii � . ." � .
� � � � 1 p �r �
I I. . •ft � . aj o Y ` a� c .i� � q^� i. C i.' . .
� . . ' '� P N ^ (:` � r. C O� �. i j i �
O �
� � � . . . . . . i ^.. 3 � � t € U c.�31 � �i. o gt'i�.�' � � . � . .. �.
�, "' !^ .. ' -. _ . "�.� i(� ` - _ . . . � �'�.� � '��,'�l` ". 6 � . t �'. . �.P C.� � �.- � � � ... � �.
(p w � �
, Cn \ -. . � - . . . � -C c . c � r L. - !� i s - . . . . . .
� t - - . . � � � r � � p , �' � �
i
_ _ � � � � _
_ . . � rr � 2 a ` , �
h ' p � .
_ N ,
� . � � . . ' 7'� . . � i.D " . -1\ ,.i7. _.Q�a "'r iN" . . - ..
� . . - . � U <' � . j '�� � 1� 4 � � .
I N � n
I'y� � . . _ I �. � ;� I � i ;' I I � F � 5 �
.I;— � £. H : , I :
'i'Z+ � , _ i"r (��r h . - 1 I �
, o ��� . !( � a r� U , �� .
� (� �` �
^� � I 8'-�f `
' �� (� � `�, 't I��; . � , -
, • �� �
LI �
�I� � la'Hit(((Ih I f�� i I � /` � \ - � , �
�� " �� _ � i : ;J � �_.; � �N g.
� i. . . � � � � . � .- � � � .-. . . _ . . . � 0 UJ `� i� k j � I . ..� . . . , : _ ' ,
N �: g;� @� � �
L L o r� �� 5�
I�(� � 6' „ �
3j- ►� '.f f 'C n t1f ��K ( . . 3 . . .
. � . . - . . � . . - ii P �`` �i p � a � � . � � _. �� . � . .
a
� .` c. �.� �°�n � R�;
� �
> _ " � � S }� � N �
f .. � .. _ - . . . tP ^ . .
Y z
.z m
(R < �
4 . J' � .. . . _ . ._ . ' ' . . , � .
, � � - ' ' . � - . ' . ; -. . - ` .: . , , _. , '
' . ' .Y- .. . . . . . .:.:.-. ....:'� ... :', ......�. .. � ..
r * i �
P .� �
�
�
': �`�,r��., ,�t,,�,_ �..,i
�. �.
�..
,_: !�
'r—�
:���
}'�Z �
1S,—
a
�
�-� 9•cf' yl�io9�ds n'aU
� �
� ,, , �,2M 3eo�+.a..l
� i "
Z �j . }' ��
I
� G,n�� 1 �
.-�;.
� r "�
�
\
\
\�\ � � ,
U let Ye� '>s��T� � � ••�
°�st. `\ � \ � ,
'�t-��suim.ta� a.zatla
[??�� �:�u�j i��a pi�� Q.t�je �a.�r,4
_'am `LI ��'I P?es �o aattxa� �sea
�nos aya ;0 6jzatp:zw �a�3 00'SZ
xuf�� a���ad p��s ��Z��H aesxau,oS
pTL�S 30 ['[ a0'j �O �)ll'C'[ ��S�a5L�7
l�a uo �ti-�od e o� 6[:caasea a�uat�a
: au F� a�� r� p�v� '�tL�o�a �aaizseouc
`7. � :l��t (�?tt� �o �c>i?;to� �Bar�y�avv
7 }o �CLz�c��nos �aaj 00"9Z `�'[X?I[
a��siautoS ��?Es 3� ZZ �oZ �o au�j
".15�.-rM :3t{7 l?O :jU'f.C�ti E �E c�UTllll'L.��£j
:auzT p�qiz�s�p
�,Tn�o��o.F at�a zo �t���1�.�c»i �n�,CZ
'e�as�uu�t.� ���uno;} �aos�� t:�apzo�ag
;�acano� aila �o �^?33o ey� ux aji� uo
�oaaay� ae7d at��. o� ��pzo��E `sIZ?H
�asaai�tvS `i7. Pu�' l.i s��'I 3o aasd �eti�st
.,� .
NOIT,dIi[�S�R •_, �•.
�s� °�
_��;�
.��11�.��.J � .,�, : .'•I, n� � yrl ,'.1 1 �. .� . ' � �;��rj,
n�.ir�l p.u.�.;;i.�rr� f.��F�. wF� i, �r�41 uu�. up.,pn
.�a;ns l,�;v�p i.w �alrun u,i aw /�4 P�;vrla�d se�►
�iodal :D'J61�%'�";�"s si:il 1['U3 �Ul:�� �4aj341
, �
:�- � � .
C�
�f� s
'M„st ; /r�6L ,�,
e..._
i
�
0
V
4
N
�•ez
� £'9i
�
.sy 0
1
W�
o,
H ��
�o 0
' o�
� ,i
� 1
.tse7 � � (�
0 0
r—;�--� ,oE
��� I
;�F,.�� I
. br � � � o` _..1 ., . �
_... -. r - �,..� ..,.......� .^...=4 ... .r .. .. � I
�� � � I .
4
I ,oA � p'
./----� .oE
'MN
,EE
: �
i �
�, r
Ft ,FF
8L6/ 'L/ �'iew�noN
�5'h 9 £' - G s'fi
��r� <S )N ��� d b'1 o-YNd �' £ Z
NY9Y7��/� �NilA'M
� }� o.t 9.1 !1 ns
A/OyZ S]1d720NS �
� OS' ' „I '���5
�
�---- -
�
�, y .: ���
�__,
�:
'z�
-.: � .
,_. �.
, �..
'� • c �;
;'. • _
�:`
8�os-zsh
%i�" 1��y����i� oob/
H31t/IN�s 'Q Nd9s'��
sr�iy .�.�'sa��wos
�: /}•��y��7S Z'T'�L/ rtn� �0 1bdd�. �O , No/s/il/06't7S
�?� ' `• � I�J �5�,} � ,. .L b' 7G �.d .�;J! �
,. '`-'t!! j;.; . � . , .- . � � .. ,{:. - . .:�:> � � 4�:5�%.
}�.sNM p
d�sodo�d
�
�
�
3
.1' /-- avy-�f-e- � � _ - - -
�_� v�a\' \ � \
�
i _ 5dd ` s�
� ��r� 3�d �d� � I
� �0 9irr> >o ��a sa
_ � \P\, �� �
� M� ��� �
� e� ��\�
_ ____—� � m ` �
�
\ �� � \ �
_� , , ,,,
\ � � ���_, � ����
� �_ � �•� ,
_�� ;-- � -��
/ ��' a�,, ,so� 41
//,_ . a4{ yf�m � �p \ ui7 C
-�
% ��� \�\�
— ��� ��� \�\
�
// f��� �
--1'� � / � � r
� S`_ � / - —T —�
�
�
�� :�0�` ; -' `^��-�� °
N / �-�
�� � _ � \
� �_
.� �) � � -`�-
� � `� �' � � / -�-
�� ��� ����
° `� ��
C y � �
d �
X� � �
�o �.:
/� f�� �
�; // �
�
� � ��%�
� ��i,� � � - -
�,
�
Nd
_` � � l
a
m�
1� � �� .�_/1
a�
�� �� ��� .
4 II Ij��
� � � �\�
� �� �` �\
� �� �A , �� _ �_,
��
`�� °� --- - ��\�� �� �-�
`�z - _;
_>. � �o i
�,o�x- � ' \ � \ 1 � i
� \ , $ �� ��� �
�,_��,�� �� �-���
��6
�V�������
,\�� � �����i �� ���
\�����;���,�,��i
��,�����!� /t
���_��� ��/� �
� � �\�\ �— �/r�%
\� �--% �
�,� \��� , _� �� � ��%
�������� �����
� � ����� �� ����
�; ` / ����✓�j �\�
���� � �-- � �� �� �
���--- �-_���\�
�_ �� = -�% �
�
�� -f ,, �- -� -���
� �� ���_ �
,�� ��� ,
� -�- � � � � o ,
` � � 1 � � )��
ci\ o / M
� �� � I � � f
i� (
�� � � �� �
.�l �
,� ;, ��
�,,, ���d�
��
, ) ��
, ,���� J��
� , ,���, �� y�
J
I � j����% � `�
-� .,�/� j��� _-��
��I � ����� / %���-- �-
,JII�/�( ��, , � _
,����,���, r _ � : � ,
����`�1 � ); � �i
, / ���,! � �- �
l. /���) �� lr / -�
�
�� \� � �-����� _ . — � i,i�i
� ��o e�� o� ��
� \ � --� ��M � = /�.,,�",dC/ fs�Jpl�a
� ��`^� � /' �— �
�� ��\���� --= �"���i� �j%�
� I � i
- /
i� � l i i�/r,,.ni i
_���j /
���
��- ` �i
=� �
� �t -,t
�� �/ / �.
�
/�
�