The URL can be used to link to this page

1991-11-19CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA November 19, 1991 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Adoption 4. Consent Calendar a. Acknowledgment of the October Treasurer's Report. b. Approval to Prepare of a Feasibility Report for Ivy Falls Creek Phase II - RESOLUTION NO. 91-80. c. Approval to Purchase Voting Booths. d. Approval of Request for Leave of Absence - Sergeant Wicks e. Approval of the List of Contractors. f. Approval of the List of Claims. g. Acknowledgment of the November 12th Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes. h. Acknowledgment of Design Progress of Kensington Park. End of Consent Calendar 5. Public Comments 6. Unfinished and New Business a. Discussion on Mendota Plaza Sign Criteria Amendment. b. Discussion on Contractor Licensing. c. Discussion on Trunk Highway 13 Bridge Replacement Project - RESOLUTION NO. 91-81 . d. Discussion on Air Noise Mitigation Part 150 Program. e. Discussion on Approval of RESOLUTION NO. 91-82, Establishment of Air Noise Litigation Escrow Funds. f. Discussion on Somerset 19 Fire Protection Improvements. g. Authorize New Furnace Installation - 1306 Kendon Lane. h. Consider Purchase Offer for 1305 Kendon Lane Home. i. Demolition of Old Fire Station - RESOLUTION NO. 91-83. 8. Council Comments 9. Adjourn CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 19, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administrator SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for November 19 Council Meeting Two items have been added to the consent calendar (*). One item has been added to the Unfinished and New Business section of the agenda (*). 3. Agenda Adoption It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda printed on green paper. 4g. Acknowledgment of the November 12th Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes. See attached minutes. 4h. Acknowledgment of Design Progress of Kensington Park. See attached memo. 6i. Demolition of Old Fire Station. See attached memo and RESOLUTION No. 91-83. MTL:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA November 19, 1991 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Adoption 4. Consent Calendar a. Acknowledgment of the October Treasurer's Report. b. Approval to Prepare of a Feasibility Report for Ivy Falls Creek Phase II - RESOLUTION NO. 91-80. c. Approval to Purchase Voting Booths. d. Approval of Request for Leave of Absence - Sergeant Wicks e. Approval of the List of Contractors. f. Approval of the List of Claims. End of Consent Calendar 5. Public Comments , 6. Unfinished and New Business b. Discussion on Mendota Plaza Sign Criteria Amendment. c. Discussion on Contractor Licensing. d. Discussion on Trunk Highway 13 Bridge Replacement Project - RESOLUTION NO. 91-81 . e. Discussion on Air Noise Mitigation Part 150 Program. f. Discussion on Approval of RESOLUTION NO. 91-82, Establishment of Air Noise Litigation Escrow Funds. f. Discussion on Someret 19 Fire Protection Improvements. g. Authorize New Furnace Installation - 1306 Kendon Lane. h. Consider Purchase Offer for 1305 Kendon Lane Home. 8. Council Comments 9. Adjourn CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TREASURER'S REPORT, OCTOBER 1991 DAKOTA COUNTY STATE BANK Checking Account 4.85% Savings Account 4.75% C.D. Rep. Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. CHEROKEE STATE BANK C.D. due 1/31/92 @ 5.0% Saving Cert. 2/28/92 @ 5 1/4% Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. U.S. Treasury 8 5/8% 5-15-93 Notes GNMA Mtg. Pool 9% U.S. Treasury Money Mkt Gov't. Securities Fund TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds Available 12/31/90 10/30/90 Rates Oct. 31 Escrow funds (Amercian City Hall Buildings Railroad Crossing TOTAL LES:kkb BALANCE 137,860.53 536.84 0 138,397.37 592,581.00 100,000.00 350,000.00 13,952.59 363,952.59 600,000.00 100,000.00 498,671.88 267,592.44 $1,304,287.55 $1,200,000.00 $3,772,901.83 $6,192,720.44 $3,523,644.00 Money Bank Fid COLLATERAL 692,581.00 700,000.00 Value 10-30-91 (est.) National Bank) 9-30-91 $ 15,252.83 $167,789.72 $183,042.55 521,850.00 276,723.47 ($1,873,000.00) ($1,967,000.00) Market 4.85% 5.20% CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ FROM: Klayton H. Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Ivy Falls Creek Phase II Construction Job No. 8814B Improvement No. 91, Project No. 7 DISCUSSION: November 13, 1991 Over the years there have been many problems, concerns and com- plaints about the Ivy Creek drainage system. Around 1979 the City did a feasibility study which looked at repairing and protecting the creek. In 1987 the "Super Storm" caused damage that required City attention. In 1990, Barr Engineering, working for the Lower Missis- sippi Watershed Management Organization, began a study of the creek system. This year a resident, Jack Brassard, has requested the City to complete an improvement project in the creek near his home. Given the ongoing problems, and the potential damage which could occur if another large storm hit the area, this would be a good time to look at the overall situation. Barr Engineering has completed two reports, Working Papers I and II, which address possible solutions to the erosion problems in the creek. Staff has reviewed the papers and found them to be informa- tive; the next step would be to take the studies a step further and look at the feasibility and desirability of proceeding with a creek improvement project. The major items which would be addressed in a feasibility report are best options, cost comparisons, funding sources (including other cities), financing mechanisms, public comments and project completion. Staff could complete such a feasibility report before the end of the year. In addition to a feasibility report, staff could complete a proposal for a City Wide Storm Water Utility Fund. A storm water utility fund is a new funding method available to cities to cover storm sewer maintenance and improvement costs. This funding mechanism works just like a sanitary sewer or water utility and could even be incorporated into quarterly sewer billings. Storm water utility funds are particularly attractive because storm sewer assessments are often difficult to justify and using general obligation is not attractive. There are other advantages to a utility fund which could be discussed in detail in a staff proposal. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council order the preparation of a feasibility report addressing Ivy Creek drainage system improvements, and order staff to prepare a proposal for implementation of a City Wide Utility Program. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with my recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 91- , RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR IVY FALLS CREEK PHASE II CONSTRUCTION AND PREPARATION OF A PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A STORM WATER UTILITY PROGRAM (IMPROVEMENT NO. 91, PROJECT NO. 7). KHE:dfw City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 91 - RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR IVY FALLS CREEK PHASE II CONSTRUCTION AND PREPARATION OF A PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A STORM WATER UTILITY PROGRAM (IMPROVEMENT NO. 91, PROJECT NO. 7) WHEREAS, numerous erosion problems have occurred in the Ivy Creek Drainage system; and WHEREAS residents in the area have periodically, informally requested the City to address possible solutions; and WHEREAS the City Engineer has completed Phase I of the feasibili- ty report; and WHEREAS the cost for Ivy Creek improvements and other storm water projects are difficult to assess and prove benefit. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the City Engineer be and is hereby authorized and directed to prepare a feasibility study as to whether said proposed improvements are feasible, whether said improve- ments should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and as to the estimated cost of said improvement. 2. The City Engineer be directed to prepare a proposal for the implementation of a City wide storm water utility program to finance new and existing storm water systems throughout the City. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 19th day of November 1991. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administ t<-- FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Purchase of Voting Booths INTRODUCTION November 13, 1991 The 1990 general election made two problems glaringly clear. Unorthodox gubernatorial races rapidly and prematurely age City Clerks and Mendota Heights has far too few voting booths. Unfortunately little can be done about the first circumstance, however, by this memo I request Council authority to eliminate the second problem. INFORMATION The City currently owns 47 voting booths for use in its six precincts. One booth per precinct is dedicated for handicapped use, placed on a table rather than standing on its legs. The remaining 41 booths are allocated to the precincts based on registered voter distribution. There were 6,700 voters in the community in November, 1990. Lengthy delays for voters were caused in four precincts because voters had to wait for booths to become available. Voter registration is rapidly approaching 7,000. Additional booths are needed now, and the need will certainly become greater as Kensington develops. The 1991 election budget does not anticipate or provide for the purchase of additional election booths. Because anticipated costs for legislative re -districting and associated precinct revisions and the cost of processing a presidential primary, are so great the 1992 budget will likely not provide financing for booths. After factoring anticipated 1991 expenses, however, the 1991 year end election budget balance should be approximately $2,700. Booths comparable to those currently owned by the City cost $175 each. The 1991 balance would support the purchase of 15 new booths. Acquisition of 15 booths will not support our needs four years from now, but would alleviate most of the short term problems. RECOMMENDATION I recommend that Council authorize the purchase of 15 voting booths from Business Records Corporation for a total cost not to exceed $2,700. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass a motion to authorize issuing a purchase order to Business Records Corporation for 15 Model VI voting booths for a cost not to exceed $2,700. Mendota Heights Police Department MEMORANDUM 15 November, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Cou;cil City Administr FROM: Police Chief, Den is Delmont SUBJECT: Request for Leave of Absence INTRODUCTION I'm requesting an 11 week paid leave of absence for Sgt. D. W. Wicks so that he may attend the 170th session of the F.B.I National Academy in Quantico, Virginia from June 21 to September 4, 1992. HISTORY In 1986, I attended the 146th session of the F.B.I.N.A. and it proved to be the most valuable learning experience of my career. In 1988, Sgt. Wicks and I forwarded an application on his behalf and that request has finally been approved. DISCUSSION The F.B.I. National Academy represents the ultimate in police training worldwide. Each session includes 100 to 120 management and executive level police officers from all over the world. Graduation from the academy's 11 weeks of study is often used as a prerequisite for executive level law enforcement positions. The education and experience associated with the academy represents a once in a liftime opportunity that is offered to a small percentage of police officers. Sgt. Wicks has been a tireless, motivated and effective member of this department for over 20 years. During my 9 year tenure as police chief, he has consistently been the leading contributor to our success. This experience will serve as a reward for his many years of exemplary service as well as an important contribution to his future success in our community. RECOMMENDTAION That Council approve an 11 week paid leave of absence for Sgt. Wicks to attend the 170th session of the F.B.I. National Academy in accordance with the provisions noted on the attached agreement. AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AND SERGEANT DORANCE WICTCS REGARDING ATTENDANCE AT FBI NATIONAL ACADEMY 1. The City agrees to provide Sgt. Wicks with an 11 -week paid leave of absence from 6/21/92 to 9/4/92 for the purpose of attending the FBI National Academy in Quantico, Virginia. 2. The City further agrees to reimburse the cost of one round-trip airfare during the session for Sgt. Wicks to return home. 3. As a condition of accepting the paid leave and airfare, Sgt. Wicks agrees to continue in the employ of the City as Sergeant for a period of not less than two years following completion of the paid leave. 4. Should Sgt. Wicks choose to leave City employment in less than the agreed two years, he shall be liable to reimburse the City for a pro -rated portion of the 11 weeks paid leave. Pro -rating shall be determined by the number of months employment since completing the paid leave divided by 24 months. Dorance Wicks, Sergeant Date Dennis Delmont, Police Chief Date Tom Lawell, City Administrator Date AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AND SERGEANT DORANCE WICKS REGARDING ATTENDANCE AT FBI NATIONAL ACADEMY 1. The City agrees to provide Sgt. Wicks with an 11 -week paid leave of_absence from 6/21/92 to 9/4/92 for the purpose of attending the FBI National Academy in Quantico, Virginia. 2. The City further agrees to reimburse the cost of one round-trip airfare during the session for Sgt. Wicks to return to home. 3. As a condition of accepting the paid leave and airfare, Sgt. Wicks agrees to continue in the employ of the City as Sergeant for a period of not less than two years following completion of the paid leave. 4. Should Sgt. Wicks choose to leave City Employment in less than the agreed two years, he shall be liable to reimburse the City for a pro -rated portion of the 11 weeks paid leave. Pro -rating shall be determined by subtracting from 24 the number of months employment since completing the paid leave, divided by 24 months. Dorance Wicks, Sergeant Date Dennis Delmont, Police Chief Date Tom Lawell, City Administrator Date As per City Council action taken November 19, 1992 LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL November 19, 1991 Gas Piping Licenses Forrest Heating Hokanson Plumbing, Inc. General Contractors Licenses CNS Construction Timbercraft Enterprises, Inc. Heating & Air Conditioning License Forrest Heating T November 19, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council CLAIMS LIST SUMMARY: Total Claims $ 358,208 Significant Claims American Natl Bank Bond pymt 4,022 Bukx MWCC Sac chagges 15,444 Norwest Bond pymt 147,450 Winthrop Weinstine Legal 4,363 Unusual Claims E F Anderson Park eq 8,726 Excel Utilities Impr Lennox 14,688 Friedges Landscape Park 6,992 Houle Const Impr 46,180 Moodys Bond printing 4,000 Ryan Const Impr 59,315 T Shaughnessy Co • Bond expense 10,891 Southview Design Tree planting 13,460 15 Nov 1991 -7,:55 PM 1 Temp Check Nurnber 1 Ternp. Check Number Vendor Name 1771 Je 10 11 112 13 14. 1151 116 117 118 19 ;70 .22 23 !24 1 A MM 1 AMM Dept .LU -Adm Dept bu-xa a liziage 15-Engr 60 -Utilities 20 -Police 70 -Parks 30 -Fire 80 -Planning ////9/9.1C I a i ms List 40 -CEO 85 -Recycling Pape 1 City of Mendota Heights 90 -Animal Control Account Code Comments Amount 4 C) 8 01-4400-110-10 11/7 leol rntn 25.00 01-4400-109-09 11/7 lepl rntg 25.00 2 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 1 Ternp Check Nurnber 2 2 Earf F Anderson & Assoc 09-4460-000-00 2 Earl F Anderson & Assoc 01-4420-050-50 4 Totals Temp Check Number 2 Ternp Check Nurnber 3 3 AT&T 3 re 89-6 I sins 01-4210-020-20 Nov svc 27. .Totals Temp Check Nurnber 3 10)78 50.00 8.599.50 127.07 118ia 9 241 8.726.57 7.30 7.30 26 26 27 :9 31, 321 33 34 35: 36 25 30 Temp Check Nurnber 4 Re 1306 Kendon . 38 29 40, 31 32 23 - 4 American Burner Svc - - • A 16-4460-000-00 - . 145.00 145.00 • 41 42 44 34 35 36 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber Ternp Check Nurnber 5 4 45 46 47 45 37 38 39' , , ;: 5'Ace Hardware :', '' - 5 Ace Hardware-; , , .. - , 08-4335-000-00_ -, . . 08-4335-000-00 - • . . . splys,4 . splys , ' , • 29.12 • , 2.51 --- ' . 49 51 52 40 41 42 5 Ace Hardware -- 15 08-4335-000-00 splys 7.47 39.10 53 54 sr; 56 42 45 =Totals Temp Check Nurnber Temp Check Number 6 5 . . 57 58 59 GO 47 413 6 Albinson 6 Albinson 05-4300-105-15 09-4490-000-00 solus spivs 89-6E 61.69 36.06 61 62 63 64 91 12 % , s, ' ,: --Totals Temp Check Number ' - , - .-6 . - , ., , - , ' . , .= ..,.. .• - 97.75 , ' ,, , 67 68 52 53 64 Temp Check Nurnber 7 69 70 71 72 6674 17 American National Bank , ' 7 American National Bank, , s - 13-4456-000-00 - 16-4226-000-00 , ' . ' , Re-st-aid=bondse - :.escrow fee_ ,- - . - . .3.522.50 500.00 . , ' • ^ 75 3, Total- Temp Check Number • 7 4.022.50 15 Nov 1991 • Claims List Page 2 , 1 2, Temp Check Number 1 , 8 2 3 ; 4 • Temp. Check Rmalmr Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount 5 5 . 7 ' 8 H i 8 Arneson Fuel 01-1210 n1 oas 2.140.60 - 5 15, 12 4 k 8 • 2,140.60 '111 Totals Temp Check Number 8.; 13 14 , 16 I:7 0 Temp Check Number 9 1,5: 4t_P &11v1O Supply 01-4330-440-20 parts 21.20 17 20 i !"11 9 B & J Auto Supply 01-4330-490-50 parts 12.15 071 9 B & J Auto Supply 01-4330-490-50 parts 27.75 16! 9 8 & J Auto Supply 15-4330-490-60 parts 18.87 2, n n 24 1,79:1 9 B & J Auto Supply 01-4330-490-50 parts 126.83 20, 9 B & J Auto Supply 01-4330-490-50 parts 12.37 -- .------ 121. 25 26 4 27 28 L- %.2 , 1 54 219.17 .23. Totals Temp Check Number 9 24 7'31 20 31 32 Temp Check Number 10 '2G -.i. .. 10 Battery & Tire Warehouse 01-4330-440-20 parts 33.44 .36 34 351 2E. 10 Battery & Tire Warehouse 01-4330-440-20 parts 23.64 29 10 Battery & Tire Warehouse 01-4330-490-50 parts 54.90 ,o6 -- ------ 37 38 39 i 40 31 32 33 30 111.98 , Totals Temp Check Number 10 41 42 1 43 44 3' 354 36 Temp Check Number 11 11 Board c.f WaterCommissioners 09-4425-000-00 Octsvc Mendakota Park 253.884 4 47 11 Board of Water Commissioners 01-4425-315-30 - Octsvc • -- . 74.03 49 ' 11 Board of Water:Commissioners 08-4425-000-00 Octsvc 25.98 . 51 . .Boar. of Water Commissioners 15-4425-310-60 c • 7.13 - 52 40 41 42 -- ------53 54 44 361.025 Totals Ternp Check Number 11 56 43 57 5 Ternp Check Number. 12 , GO - , 46 47 48 2inson 1 ument 05-4330-490-15rors 95.0081 -- 62 ----- 63 12 95.00 64 5066 51 Totais Temp Check Number 12 - , 6 . , 67 ,.. Temp. Check Number , . 13 . - 68 52 64 69 70 13 Brooks Superette 01-4320-020-20 oas 2212 14.01 71 13 Brooks Superette 01-4320-020-20 pas 2222 27.00 72 . , . , .. , -----73 , ,,, . . 26', -! . . . - .- ' , . h . - . 41.01 . Totals Temo Check Number- 13 • . 7 Th Temp Chr Number 14 e") (1 15 Nov 1991 Claims List Pape 3 Fri 2:55 PM City of Mendota Heiohts Teruo Check Number 14 ° I Ternp. Check Nurnber Vendor Name 7 del LE h ,1 0i 14 Royer Truck _ a er Truck Account Code Comments Arncarnt 2 , 4 5 " 1 8 01-4330-490-50 parts 146.35 01-4330-490-50 28 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 14 core return 112' 3� 114 Temp Check Nurnber 15 LS I10 15 City Motor Supply 01-4330-440-20 parts X17' 15 City Motor Supply 15-4330-490-60 parts '16 15 City Motor Supply 01-4330-460-30 119 15 City Motor Supply 15-4330-490-60 201 15 City Motor Supply 01-4330-440-20 121115 City. Motor Supply 01-4330-490-50 22 15 City Motor Supply 01-4330-490-70 23 15 City Motor Supply I24 15 City Motor Supply 25 --- 'P' 135 12h T�.i n1 Torn r, hln mhev 1 01-4330-445-40 01-4330-440-20 parts parts parts parts parts parts parts 9 ;0 r1 46.67cr 12 99.68 28.60 57.36 39.56 105.10 371.62 13 14 t'1 15 10 17 10 19 20 21 22 -7 23 24 25 20: ) - -_- 32.32 --- -- - _ --�zg 16.96 67.85 128.89 848.26 291 30 31 33 74 35 ' 29 30 Temp Check Nurnber 16 rprs 2282 2286 37 38' 33 40 31 32 33 16 City of St Paul -- 16 01-4330-460-30 1,141.40 1. 141.40 47. 42 as 34 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 16 45 35 46 36 Temp Check Nurnber 17 47 48 37 , ., 49 38 17 Commercial Asphalt 01-4422-050-50 wear mix 519.05 50 40 17 519.05 53 41 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 17 54 42 55 56 43 Temp Check Nurnber 18 57 44 - 58 45 18 Communications'Center 01-4330-440-20 rprs 80.00 0 46-- 61 47 18 62 48 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 18 80.00 64 64 49 65 50 • Temp Check` Number , 19. 66 68 62 19 Continental Cablevision 01-4200-610-20 Nov svc 5.95 69 53 19 Continental Cablevision 01-4200-610-30 Nov svc 5.95 70 64 -- 72 65 - 38 . _ ,'11.90 73 56 ` Totals Temp Check Number 19 75 79 emp LI-ecK Number tv ,Recorder 16-4473-000-00 filing fees 30.00 0 0 �) C) 1 1 Nov 1991 Er_i_a 55 PM NT Claims List City of Mendota Heights Pape 4 21 Terno Check Nurnber 20 '4' Temp. 5I Check Nurnber Vendor Narne �7 8i 20 County Recorder 1 2, 3 ' 4 Account Code Comments Amount 01-4490-110-10 recording fee 15.00 7 8 9 r11 f1Or 40 .11j Totals Terno Check Nurnber 20 1121 [13' Terno Check Nurnber 21 14, 1 1 151 21 Cnawfsrd_Roor 01 .335.310-50 i76j 21 Crawford Door 01-4335-310-70 t171 21 Crawford Door 15-4335-310-60 1 , 11-8 -- .18` 63 '20' Totals Terno Check Nurnber 21 c11 122 Terno Check Nurnber 22 23: i.24, 2 Dahlgrer� Sherdlcw Uban 22 __-Tat_a,1s Iamp_Check Nurnber 01-4224.-135-80 — --- rors rors rors 45.00 12 13 14 c) 1s' 16 32.90 17 18 19 20 Oct svc 32.90 32. 95 21 22 ,- 23 7 24 98.75 1.408.00 125 1227 '61- •) 128 :0 1.408. 00 30 , 22 33 34 35 26 .c 2s 130 Terno Check Nurnber 23 37 39 40 31 32 33 23 Dakota County Tech Inst -- 23 - 01-4400-030-30 trno 150.00 150.00 41 42 43 as 34 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 23 45 35 r 46 47 36 Terno Check Number 24 48 37 49 38 " 24 Dakota County Treas " 01-4490-110-10 Deed tax etc' 6.65 50 39 _ _- ---- 52 40 24 6.65 53 41 54 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 24 55 42 56 43 Ternp Check Nurnber 25 7 44 58 59 45 - 25 Dis Corn -of Mirnnesota. Inc 01-4330460-30• rors ' 263.85 60 46 25 Dis Corn of Minnesota. Inc 01-4330-460-30 filters batteries 205.80 61 47 -- 62 63 46 50 469.65 64 49 Totals Ternp Check Number 25 65 50 66 91 Ternp Check Nurnber 26 " 7 68 52 69 63 26 Excel Utilities Inc 76-4460-833-00 1 91-5 14,687.95 70 pynt 71 54 -- 72 55" 26 " 14, 687.95 73 56 .Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 74 `57 , ,26• ., - 79 Ternp Check Nurnber 27 27 h erb , i 4610-020-20 re 2245 680.40 0 15 Nov 1991 Claims List Pape 5 Fri 2:55 PM City of Mendota Heiohts •• 23 4 , 1„,NumPer Vendor Name 7 Account Code a -- Tu--- Totals Temp Check Number • 27 11 12 Temp Check Number 28 13 Temp Check Nurnber 27 Ternp. Check 4 28 Friedges Landscapino Inc 09-4460-000-00 15 16 17 16 28 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 28 119 Ternp Check Number 29 ,20 21 29 W W Grainger 22 -- ,23 29 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 29 01-4305-030-30 .25 .26 Ternp Check Nurnber 30 17 26 30 Goodwill Industries 01-4268-085-85 30 )29 30 31 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 32 33 Temp Check Number 31 30 34 35 36 31 Hapen Office Eq 01-4301-020-20 Comments Amount pyrnt 7 89-6 I parts Oct sv software 680.40 6.992.00 23 4 0 6 7 a 0 1101 n 12 ral 14 n 15 16 17 18 119 20 -• 6.992.00 21 22 23 24 41.50 41.50 ;25 26 27 28 652.50 652.50 21 30 1 31 72 33 34 35 26 '37 n t 39 40 41 Zu 44 99.00 45 46 47 45 37 38 39 40 41 42 31 , ,,Totals Temp Check Nurnber 31 99.00 49 50 51 52 Temp Check Nurnber 32 32 Harmon Glass 01-4330-490-50 rprs 303 91.67 53 54 55 56 43 44 45 46 47 48 ,32 Totals Temp Check:Number 32 91.67 Temp Check Nurnber 33 57 56 59 GO 61 62 63 64 49 50 61 33 C W Houle Inc 33 C W. Houle, Inc 72-4460-835-00 pyrnt 5 86-4. 37,929.98 72-4460-835-00 pyrnt 6 86-4' , 8.249.80 0 0 65 66 • • 68 52 63 54 66 46.179.78 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 33 55 69 70 71 72 Ternp Check Number ' 56 . 34 I C M -A RT -34 • 01-2072 .). 11/1 payroll 1 261.02 , • 73 74r, 7;9 15 Nov 1991 • Claims List Rape 6 P1 2 3 Ternp Check Nurnber 34 1 2 4 4 5 16 Ternp. Check Nurnber Vendor Narne Account Code Comments Amount 5 6 7 8 7 :8 ,s3 34 ICMA RT 01-4134-110-10 . 11/1 payroll 91.32 _ -- 9 ;° 12 10 68 352.34 I" Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 34 11 2. 13 14 15 16 13 Ternp Check Nurnber 35 14 15 .39 Invi=r f Fard 01-4.33.0-490-7 i parts 4. 13 '7 18 19 20 ,ye _ 76 35 Inver Grove Ford 01-4330-490-70 parts 9.85 n —_ 79 70 13.98 21 22 23 24 19 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 35 .20. 21 T rnemp_,.GLeck Nuber 36 zs 26 27 28 22 29 ,23 36 Knox Commercial Credit 05-4300-105-15 splys 35.41 3 24 311 36 Knox Commercial Credit 01-4330-490-50 splys 18.46 32 _ 25 36 Knox Commercial Credit 01-4305-050-50 splys no tax 5.99 33 :GI --- 74 35 27 59.86 a0 _108 28Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 36 37 29' 26 30 39 TempCheck Nurnber 37 ,40 31 32 37 Thornas Knuth 72-4415-835-00 mi reirnb 17.87 33 nrnas unuth Q19-4415-000-00 rni reirnb 14.58 41 42 43 44 34 37 Thomas Knuth 41-4415-846-00 mi reirnb 41.25 35 37 Thomas Knuth 70-4415-871-00 mi reirnb 23,37 36 37 Thomas Knuth 76-4415-833-00 mi reirnbX2.00 45 47 48 37 37 Thomas Knuth 05-4415-105-15 mi reirnb 8.25 39 222 - - .. _. 127.32 49 52 40 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 37 41 42 Ternp Check Nurnber 38 ' 53 54 56' 56 .- 44 38 Krechs Office Machines 01-4300-110-10 splys 25.00 45 -- .t- 589 60 46 38 25.00 47 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 38 48 61 62 63 64 49 - Temp Check Nurnber „ 39 - " 50 -. - 51 .39 Lanpula Hdwe' '- 01-4330-460-30 parts ,' 4.10 ' 65 66. 67 68 62 -- ---- 63 39 4.10 64 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 39 69 70 71 72 65 - 56 Temp Check Number- - ' 40 • • - •' 73 74 76 7.9 40 Lakeland Ford 01-4330-490-50 parts 32.50 '1 0 15 Nov 1991 Fri 2:55 PM Claims List Pace 7 City of Mendota Heiohts 12 Teruo Check Nurnber 40 3 Ternp. 5 Check r Nurnber Vendor Name Account Code 7 8 40 Lakeland Fc.rd 9 01-4330-490-50 113 10 11 12 14 115 16 117 118 119 ze 91 :22 r23 [24 125 1'6 28 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 80 Totais Ternp Check Nurnber 40 Ternp Check Nurnber 41 41 Lotus 01-4402-110-10 41 Totals Teruo Check Nurnber 41 Ternp Check Number 42 42 M A Associates 01-4305-030-30 42 M A Associates 01-4305-050-50 42 M A Associates 01-4305-070-70 42 M A Associates 15-4305-060-60 168 Totals Temo Check Nurnber Ternp Check Nurnber 43 43 Mc Namara Contr Co 42 01-4422-050-50 Comments Amount ('1 3 ' 4 5 6 6 parts 9.72 9 0 42.22 3 4 6 renewal 24.00 solys splys solys splys 7 a 19 20 24.00 22 23 24 154.70 102.65 102.65 102.70 462.70 mix 140.91 25 26, 27) e 29 30 31 32 33, 34' 36 7 913 40 41 as 4. 44 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 43 Totais Ternp Check Nurnber 43 140.91 45 46 48 Ternp Check Number 44 7 , .4, 44'Moodys Investment Svc• . 09-4226-000-00 44 Moodys Investment Svc 36-4226-000-00. 88 91 bond issue 2, 000, 00 49 0 50 0 51 J -62 91 bond issue 2,000.00 4,000.00 Totals Temo Check Nurnber ""• 44- Ternp. Check Nurnber 45 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 49 50 61 45 Mendota Heiohts Rubbish 01-4280-310-50 45 Mendota Heiohts Rubbish 01-4280-310-70 i.45'Mendata Heights Rubbish 15-4280-310-60 45 Mendota Heiohts Rubbish 01-4280-315-30 Oct svc Oct sv Oct svc Oct SVC 50.75 50.75 61 62 63 64 50.80 53.25 65 66 67 68 52 53 64 180 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 45 205.55 69 70 71 72 56 1k6 7 .3 Ternp Check Nurnber 46 Meyer Sewer Svc 46 16-4460-000-00 •Re Furlong houses- .. • 225.00 73 74 76 7Si 46 Tot erno Check Nurnber 46 k. 225.00 0 15 Nov 1991 2055 PM Claims List City of Mendota Heinhts Pane 8 j1 1 2 Ternp Check Number 47 2 43 - - 13° Ternp. 5 5 Check 6 7 6 -Walther Vendor NameAccount Cade Comments Amount a 179 8 47 Metro Waste Control 15-4448-060-60 Oct sac chos 15.600.00 'o - 11 N, _—_47.__Metr_c!__Waste_.Comtrol 15-3615 Oct sac chos 156.00cr 12 +10' -- 13 7 11 94 15.444.00 as5 72 Tc.tals Temp Check Number 47 16 13 17 56 j° Terno Check Number 48 • 19 15, 20 ffi 48 Midwest Business Products 01-4300-110-10 solys 60.84 2' 17 22 23 116 48 60.84 24 119 Tc.tals Terno Check Number 48 - 25 '20 26 27 1'_ Temp_.C.heck_NM nber 49 - 28 22 29 ia31 49 Midwest Fence & Mfo Co 01-4305-070-70 Darts 8.04 30 31 _ ____ _ _-__.._._._-..-____-___-_. i�-�.-4'3�_...-.______._..__ 8.04 33 341 7.6. Totals Terno Check Number 49 35 35 27 36 =6 Terno Check Number 50 37 29 38 36 i39 50 Midwest Photo Svc 0.1-4305-020-2�h Oct syc 43.79 40 ._ _ ._._ -_ _. _ _ ..__. ._ _._ _-_ _ __ (31 . -- 41 '32 50 43.79 42 43' 33 Totals Temp Cberk._N-irrnber_ ;i0 44 34 45 35 Terno Check Number 51 47 47 36 48 37 51 Midwest Siren Service 07-4330-000-00 Nov mtcn 62.40 49 38 -- . • 50 •. - 51 38 - 51 .. . - .. '62.40 52 40 Totals Ternp Check Number 51 53 41 54 55 42 Terno Check Number 52 56 43 S7 44 52 Miller Printing 01-4305-030-30 business cards Kaiser 143.00 59 45 -- 60 46 52 143.00 61 62 47 Tc.tals Ternp Check Number 52 63 48 64 49 Terno Check Number 53 — 65 50 66 67 51 53- Mian Dept of, Revenue - 01-4320-050-50 Oct fuel tax 129.00 , - 68 52 -- 69 53 53 129.00 70 71 54 Totals Terno Check Number 53 72 55 73 56' Temp Check Number 54 „ ' 76 29 01-4330-460-30 rprs opticorn 90.00 i••} fl t) 0 0 0 • v 15 Nov 1991 Claims List Fri 2:55 PM City of Mendota Heiohts Ternp Check Nurnber 54 ° Ternp. Check 16 Number Vendor Name Account Cade J7 18 Totals Terno Check Nurnber 54 11O� Terno Check Nurnber 55 111 172 55 Miran Mutual Life Ins 01-2072 j 55 �Totals Iernp Check Nurnber 55 16 17 Temp Check Nurnber 56 1• 56 Minnesota Teamsters Loc 320 01-2075 20 z1 56 i-- �V2 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 56 23 '24 Terno Check Number 26' C7 M:...... -..-..L 57 -6 : 3c: -ii R- Cornrnents 11/15 payroll Nov dues Page 9 Amount 535.00 535. 00 22.00 222.00 1 2 67 G a 9 10 ( 11 T 12 13 14 !` 15 16 17 18 ") 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 126 27 2e 30 21 .'•2 33 134 27. 57 Minnesota Conway 01-4305-030-30 nozzle return 195.00cr 36� 37 a9' 114 27.00 3e 39 30 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 57 40 40 31 41 32 Ternp Check Nurnber 58 42 33 43 44 34 58 Murr Plbg 16-4460-000-00 Re 1305 1306 Kendcml 270.00 45 35 -- 46 47 36 58 270.00 48 48 37.. Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 58 49 38 4. a .. .. 50 a9 ' Ternp Check`> Number 1" ' 59 57 52 40 63 41 59 Newsweek 01-4402-110-10 renewal 43.68 54 42 -- 55 56 43 59 43.68 - 7 44 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 59 59 45 59 60 45 Terno Check Nurnber 60 61 47 62 63 431 60 Needles Co 01-4305-030-30 spivs 17.45 64 49 •• 60 Needles Co 15-4305-060-60 " splys , 17.44 -' 65 50 ".: 66 51 120 ' 34.89 .. 68 52 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 60 69 53 70 71 54 Ternp Check Nurnber 61 72 66 .. .. - 73 < 61 Northern 01-4330-215-70 " 262.32 ' 74 156 splys 76 s 79 61 Tota' Ternp Check Nurnber 61 262.32 �) �.) 15 Nov 1991 i 2:55 PM Claims List City of Mendota Heights Pape 10 I' 12 i2 I 1 2 Temp Check Number 62 3 5 �°, Ternp. 5 5 Check 6 7 6! Number Vender Name Account Code Comments Amount 6 17190 'e 62 Northern State Power 01-4212-315-30 . Nov svc 84.04 10 il `9' 62_.Northern_Stat_e_Pvweer_ 01-4212-310-50 - Nov svc 212.02 12 110 62 Northern State Power 01-4212-310-70 Nov svc 212.04 13 S1 62 Northern State Power 15-4212-310-60 Nov svc 212.04 15 112 62 Northern State Power 01-4212-320-70 Nov svc 40.26 16 113 62 Northern State Power 15-4212-400-60 Nov svc 14.00 _ 17 14 62 Northern State Power 08-4212-000-00 Nov svc 281.93 16 19 s4 -Northern State Power 01-4211-310-50 Nov svc 198.75 20 tc•• 62 Northern State Power 01-4211-310-70 Nov svc 198.75 2z 17, 62 Northern State Power 15-4211-310-60 Nov svc 198.70 23 18 62 Northern State Power 28-4211-000-00 Nov svc 726.70 24 19. 62 Northern State Power 01-4211-420-50 Nov svc - 133.94 25 20• --- 26 27 21 74,_ _ 2.513.17 28 22 Totals Temp Check Number 62 2' 23 30 31 2` Temp Check Nu.rnber_-_!-T.__ 63 _ .__.__-_ _ 32 C 33 .G, 34 63 Northern State Power 08-4211-000-00 Nov svc 841.01 35 t": 63 Northern State Power 01-4211-320-70 Nov svc 78.88 36 =6 63 Northern State Power 15-4211-400-60 Nov svc 324.20 37 ie,--- 38 30 39 189 1.244.09 40 '31 Totals Terng Check Number 63 47 32 42 43 3, 3 Terap_Ch.ecJc Number - . 84_- - 44 34 45 35 64 Norwest Bark Mpls 12-4455-000-00 primo 87 Eq cert 140,000.00 47 36 64 Norwest Bank Mpls 12-4456-000-00 Int 87 eq cert 7.250.00 46 37 64 -Norwest Bank Mpls .12-4226-000-00 .,fee , -200.00 •. 49 38 ". 64 Norwest -Bank Mpls' 01-2115 - - print` 87 eq cert " - 140, 000.00 •" 610 39 :• 64,Ncrwest Bank Mpls .. 01-1290 print 87 eq cert 140,000.00cr 52 40--- 53 41 320 147. 450.00 54 • 55 42 Totals Temp Check Number 64 56 43 - 57 44 Temp Check Number 65 59 45 .. _ . 60 46 65 Plaza Tire & Svc 01-4330-440-20 tires 139.68 61 62 47 -- 63 d6 65 139.68 64 49 ° Totals Ternp Check Number 65 65 50 66 67 61 Temg Check Number 66 W 68 62 69 53 66 Poucher Prtg & Litho 36-4226-000-00 91 bond issue 514.00 71 64 66 Poucher Prtq & Litho 09-4226-000-00 91 bond issue 512.00 72 S6 '-132 ' ., x , - 1,026.00 75 Total a Temp Check Number 66 79 Ternp Ch Number 67 :1 0 0 3 15 Nc.v 1991 Fri;,55 PM Claims List City of Mendota Heights Temp Check Number 67 Ternp. Check Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments 11 12 67 Public Ernpl Ret Assn . 67 Public Ernpl Ret Assn 134 Totals Thrn Chreck Nurnber 67 01-2074 . Dec orern 01-4131-110-10 Dec prem 14 15 .16 17 18 15 20 Ternp Check Nurnber 68 68 Quill Corp 01-4300-110-10 68 Quill Corp 01-4300-110-10 68 Quill Coro 01-4300-110-10 68 Quill Corp 01-4300-110-10 272 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 68 23 74 Terno Check Nurnber 69 20 69 Ryan Contracting 70-4460-871-00 .271 29 Totals Ternp Check Number 69 -0 31 Ternp Check Nurnber 70 32 33 70 S Office. Products 01-4300-050-50 4 3 70 S & T Office Products 140 solys splys splys return 05-4300-105-15 Pape 11 Amount 48.00 9.00 10 12 57.00 13 14 15 16 17 .18 15 20 65.52 27.92 62.91 21 2 3 24 8792cr 128.43 oymt 1 91-3 59.314,96 59.314.96 spivs 53.45 stays 228.70 282.15 37 38 40 .41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 70 Temp Check 71 1 25 20 27 28 29 2.9 31 33 , 39 '4'1 411 41 4432 ) 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 71 Sanitary Products Co 08-4335-000-00 solys 130.10 5 71 Totals Temp,Check Nurnber Temp Check Number 72 72 Schuster Ea Co 30.10 57 01-4330-490-50 rors 30 489.25 4 507.2 72 Schuster Eq Co Schuster Eq Co , 4 01-4330-490-50 01-4330-490-50 rprs rprs 157.16 50.54 58 59 6 51 62 63 64 6 66 68 6 2 4 16 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 72 96.95 Oct clnq:-, 37.45 37.45 69 70 71 72 73 74 76 ' 0 15 Nov 1991 6Z r Claims List Page 12 F— c_u___ --- _ ____ il i2 Terno Check Nurnber 74 , _ , ! 6 1 2 3 4 • 14 Tern. . 15 Check Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount 5 6 7 8 r 8 74 The Shaughnessy Co 09-4226-000-00 . 91 bond issue 4,365.25 . 7.A_Tbe_Shaughnessy Co .36-48a6=000-00 91 bond issue '6,525.75 9 1, 12 f--- 1103 --- 11 148 10,891.00 112 Totals Terno Check Number 74 4 s 16 13 I .10 Temp Check Number 75 11520 17 18 19 I" 75 Softdisk Publ 01-4402-110-10 renewal 69.95 17 1 -- 75 69.95 ..1 24 19 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 75 25 ..2026, • 27' '.2.1 Temp Check Number 76 28 Z5 .23 76 Southview Desion 01-4268-050-50 91 tree plant program 13,460.00 31 !24 -- 32 76 13.460.00 92 24 :r Totals Temp Check Number 76 25 a 7,6 ' Temp Check Number 77 7; 39 20 77 Southview Chev 01-4330-490-70 part 503 3.88 40 32 77 Southview Chev 01-4330-440-20 ort 2246 8.10 41 --- , ----- 42 43 154 -11.98 44 34 35 n Totals Temo Check Nurnber 77 45 46 47 Temp Check Nurnber 78 48 37 38 49 '' -7' 78 Russ E Smith Co 01-4330-460-30 . splys , , , • ' ' 26.20 , - ' 52 40 41 41 42 78 26.20 54 Totals Ternp Check Number 78 5 56 4 44 Ternp Check Nurnber 79 58 59 79 Streichers 01-4305-020-20solvs 240.88 60 46 47 46 -- 61 62 79 ' 240.80 63 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 7964 49 50 51 . 65 ”. . , , 66 . . , , Temp Check Number- 80 . 67 . . ‘' s., - 68 52 s-- 84 80 Suburban Gas -4330-4 ...p0 part 11.0069 70 ----- 71 80 11.00 72 7 73 - Totals Temp Check Number ,- - , . - _ , ,..f... - 76 Temp Check NUmber -' 81 , .... . ... • , ': ' , - , . 2.9 81 F Newspapers 01-4435-200-70 rink att ad 93.50 15 Nov 1991 Claims List Fri 2:55 PM City of Mendota Heights 1 • 2 3 Ternp Check Number 81 4 5 6 Ternp. Check Number Vendor Narne 7 8 9 81 Suri Newspapers • Account Code 01-4490-030-30 10 11 12 162 Totals Terno Check Number 13 I14 1s 16 n 18 19 20 F1 22 23 24 r5 26 Ternp Check Number 82 82 U S West Communications 82 U S West Communications 82 U S West Cornrnunications 81 01-4210-020-20 15-4210-060-60 01-4210-050-50 82 U S West Communications 01-4210-070-70 328 Totals. Ternp Check Number 82 Terno Check Number 83 83 Uniforms Unlimited 01-4410-020-20 27 83 6 Totals j28 30 Terno Ternp Check Number 83 Check Number 84 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 `'38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 84 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4221-120-10 84 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4222-120-20 84 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4220-120-80 84 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4220-120-80 84 Winthrop & Weinstine 16-4220-120-00 Comments demo bid ad Nov svc Nov svc Nov svc Nov svc solus Garlock Sept retainer Sgt pros Pape 13 Amount 21.70 115.20 4 7 9 113 11 12 13 14 1s 16 111.64 324.25 28.76 28.76 17 16 19 i. 20 21 220 23 24 493.41 145.05 145.05 25 26 27 28 29 30 r'1 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38( 1 39 �.J f) 40 520.50 1.520.99 Sept Re Kensington Sept Re Pentel variance Sept Re Lerlrlcrx 84 Winthrop & Weinstine 504 16-4220-120-00 462.80 1.254.56 286.20 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Sept Re Mulvihill purch 317.90 '4.362.95 Totals Terno Check Number Ternp Check Number 85 84 85 Wurth USA 15-4305-060-60 , solus 43.23 85 Totals Ternp Check Number 85 43.23 57 59 60 61 62 63 64 49 50 61 Ternp Check Number 86-Zacks Inc 86 01-4305-050-50 spivs 180.35 • 52 53 54 86 Zacks Inc 86 Zacks Inc 01-4305-070-70 15-4305-060-60 splys sp1ys 180.35 180.39 55 66 7 258 Totals Ternp-Check Number 86 Ternp Check Number 87 01-4305-050-50 541.09 0 65 66 67 68 69 72 73 74 - 76L ) 7� 15 Nov 1991 Claims List Page 14 1 �Er ,?,A55 PM City of Mendota Heights �2 Ternp Check Nurnber 87 j`?4 1 a 4 jTernp. 6 Check ,6 Nurnber Vender Name Account Cade Comments Amount 6 6 7 8 7 18 19 87 Zee Medical Svc 01-4305-070-70 . splys 26.75 _61,7 7ae_M.edical Svc. 15-4305-Z60-60 solus 26.80 9 I° 12 110 77 112 --- 261 80.30 Totals Ternp Check Number 87 13 14 16 16 113 04 1161 u Ternp Check Number 88 _ 17 18 10 20 176' 77 b 88 Ziegler Inc 01-4330-490-50 parts 270.63 88 Ziegler Inc 01-4330-490-50 parts 86.36 88 Ziegler Inc 01-4330-490-50 parts 775.43 22 23 24 i79j t0 `-21 88 Ziegler Inc 01-4330-490-50 parts 443,55 88 Ziegler Inc 01-4330-490-50 parts 5.00 88_Z.i a g1 er__Inr 01-4330=490-50 parts 65. 68cr 25 26 28 88 Ziegler Inc 01-4330-490-50 parts 402.48cr 13 24 ___616 1.112.81 9 0 32 2c Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 88 :0 27 _Setup—Chec,1 Nj rube __ 89 33 3a 35 36 29 2` 89 John M. Frantes' Sons 01-4335-310-50 rpr kit 52.00 1— 89 John M. Frantes' Sons 01-4335-310-70 rpr kit 52.00 37 ,6 40 37 89 John M. Frantes' Sons 15-4335-310-60 rpr kit 52.00 32 ---42 33 267 156.00 41 43 44 34 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 89 35 36 Temp Check Number 90 45 46 47 48 37 38 '• " 90 Smith -Dodd Auto ~01-4330-440-20part �� > < - > 8.28 49 50 51 40 90 8.28 41 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 90 42 53 54 55 56 43 - .> 44 ---- ' 45 _ 8905 - • 358.208.31 57 58 59 60 L6 Brand Total 47 48 61 62 63 64 49 e - 50 ., . , i 61 ' 65 66 67 68 52 53 54 69 70 71 72 55 56 s,a ., .., .• ,.^ . „ .. ,. .., x .. - ^ '•74 IC _< 73 76 757 0 •7 0 4 • 1, • 11 2 3 MANUAL CHECKS: ` , 2 3 4 4 6 6 13349 3,784:63 SCCU 11/1 payroll deductions 13350 883.58 Norwest Bank direct ddposit D. Olson 5 6 7 8 7 8 9 13351 32.00 State of Mn 1991 seesion laws '13352 7,980.90 PERA payroll 1O 18 / - 13353 ' 400.00 Dakota County Bank 11/1 payroll deductions 9 1 11 12 10 j1 1 112 13354 14,327.33 " 11/1 w/h 13355 3,264.87 Commissioner of REv 11/1 sit 13356 42,059.43 Payroll account 11/1 net payroll 13 15 16 13 14 16 - 13357 105.00 U of M Regr Sorby 13358 266.25 George Noack exp reimb 13359 ,16.00 Connect Inc Oct svc 17 19 79 20 16 17 18 13360. 60.25 Energy Sales filter 13361 130.80 Husnik- Meats Bonfire 13362 86.69 Russ Wahl " 21 22 23 24 19 13363 79;88 Pepsi Cola " 20 13364 50.00 Davies Water Eg Part 211 25 2627 ze 22' • 23 73,527.61 ,24 29 31 3, 32 _. G.T. 431735.92 26 27 33 34 35 36 28 29 30 37 38 39 40 31 132 33 41 42 43 44 34 35 36 45 46 47 48 37 • • 138 . •, m .tr " 39 49 50 51 52 40 - 41 42 53 54 55 56 43 44 .. . _ 45 57 58 59 60 46 47 48 61 62 63 64 49 . 50 >. 65 66 67 68 62• 63 54 69 70 71 72 65_ - 56 a C7 . " ., ° " n µ ., b " " 73 74 75 75 J 0 0 0 0 0 O CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION NOVEMBER 12, 1991 DRAFT The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Commission was held on Tuesday, November 12, 1991, in the City Hall Conference Room, 1101 Victoria Curve. Chair John Huber called the meeting to order at 7:05 o'clock p.m. The following members were present: Huber, Spicer, Lundeen, and Damberg. Kleinglass and Katz were excused. Hunter arrived late at 7:30 o'clock p.m. Staff members present were Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander, Parks Leadperson Terry Blum and Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Damberg requested revisions to the minutes on the Kensington Park discussion. Commissioner Lundeen moved approval of the October 8, 1991 minutes, as revised. Commissioner Spicer seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE REPORT Chair John Huber introduced the attendance issue and stated that this became an issue at the May 1991 meeting when he was the only Commissioner in attendance. Huber stated that City Administrator Tom Lawell, at Council's direction, had written each Park Commissioner individually and that following this action the attendance had been fine. Huber stated the September meeting again lacked a quorum and City Council had requested an attendance report upon seeing this in the minutes. Chair Huber stated he was hopeful that attendance would be better in the long run. Huber stated the Commission has been over this issue and the September meeting is not going to be a regular occurrence. Commissioner Damberg stated that people are in and out of town in this day and age and that some Commissioners have jobs that take them out of town. Commissioner Spicer stated that people don't consciously avoid the meetings. Chair Huber stated that he felt the Parks Commission was an excellent group and had provided the City Council with Page 2 excellent input over the years. PARRS INSPECTION PROGRAM Chair Huber introduced Terry Blum, Parks Leadperson, to give a presentation on the City's inspection and maintenance program for park facilities and playground equipment. Blum stated he desired to present the inspection and maintenance program to the Parks Commission to provide information on the maintenance of the new facilities. Blum stated that inspection and maintenance of our parks is an important aspect of risk management and protecting the health, welfare and safety of park users. Blum stated that because the City had experienced some park accidents recently that he felt it was important that the parks officials understood the efforts the City was making in the proper inspection and maintenance of the park equipment and facilities. Blum explained the Guidelines for Park and Playground Equipment Management that is the goal statement for the inspection program. Blum stated that each park should be formally inspected once a month and documented. Blum displayed the documentation forms. Blum stated every time an employee is in a park, he or she should be conscious of maintenance work to be performed and report findings to the Superintendent of Parks. Blum stated that every change or repair, no matter how minor is documented. Blum stated that a full time employee would be the responsible party for the monthly inspections. Blum stated a back-up check by a non -regular inspector is performed once a year to prevent complacency. Blum stated this would likely be Jim Danielson and Tom Olund. Blum described the procedures to be taken in the case of an accident in the parks. Blum displayed the records and documentation forms for the inspection programs. Commissioner Damberg inquired if any parks seem to be more problematic or have more vandalism. Blum answered that all the parks need relatively equal amounts of maintenance and that it is typically the old play equipment that needs replacing or fixing. Blum stated that Rogers Lake Park has experienced vandalism, but typically not much vandalism has occurred in our parks. Page 3 Blum informed the Commissioners to give him a call, or let City Hall know if they ever discover a need for maintenance, for instance to trim growth along a trail, or to sweep a trail, and the parks crew will respond. Chair Huber inquired about snow plowing for the trails after the Halloween storm. Blum responded that the trails could not be plowed with present equipment, given the heavy nature of the snow. Blum stated they have the option of a pickup with a plow or the grader for plowing trails. Blum stated a pickup is not heavy enough to push the heavy snow and that the grader tears up too many things along the trail and is really too large for the trails. Blum stated the budgeted snow thrower for 1992 would easily clean the trails in their present state. Blum stated that the ice rinks would be flooded the first week in December and that he was currently hiring rink attendants who would have their informational meeting on November 25th. Blum stated that the warming houses would be open on New Years Day this winter, but not on Christmas Day. KENSINGTON PARK PLANS Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander handed out a memorandum summarizing the design of the Kensington Park, its history, the constraints of the site and funding. Kullander described the south half of Kensington Park stating the two soccer fields can only fit in a north/south orientation in the south park site. He stated tall fencing will be required behind the goals along I-494 and a parking lot for 80 to 100 ,cars will be needed. Kullander stated that play equipment and picnic amenities could also be located in this section. Kullander stated a comfort station with permanent facilities was considered necessary by the Park and Recreation Commission who will need to decide the level of service for the play equipment and comfort station. Kullander stated a trail link is designed to link the north park section and area to the east, which will be single family homes. Kullander stated it was the consensus, at the October 8, 1991 meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission, to construct permanent toilets with connection to the sanitary sewer and overhangs on the building which were added to the design: Page 4 Kullander estimated the additional cost at $40,000. Kullander stated the building would have an area for vending machines, a telephone, and water fountain facing the play equipment with signage, bulletin board and the mechanical storage room facing the parking lot. Kullander stated there would be 600 sq. ft. of space under the proposed overhangs. Commissioner Spicer stated that this proposal seems to be exactly what the Commission had been looking to provide in this area. Commissioner Lundeen stated he felt having a picnic under the shelter next to a parking lot would not be desirable, and asked if the shelter would get more use if located to the east of the play equipment. Kullander explained the small picnic area near the play equipment. Kullander stated that the fencing shown is to keep ball players from parking in the multi -family complex and that Centex will provide landscaping to increase the buffer. Kullander stated the fencing is designed to keep the soccer balls out of the parking and play areas. Kullander stated the fencing is an item that can be dropped, however, cost savings are realized with the original bid and fencing would be more expensive at a later date if bid outside the park construction. The 28 foot kick barriers along I-494 was discussed. Kullander stated some type of barrier is needed. Commissioner Lundeen stated an option would be a webbing net mounted on telephone poles and this would be less expensive than a 28' tall cyclone fence. Kullander stated telephone poles are crooked and unsightly and that the netting would require maintenance and replacement on a periodic basis. Commissioner Lundeen stated the wind drag on a 28' cyclone fence is what drives the cost up because the size of the piping that would be needed. The Commission decided to bid the webbing net as a bid alternate. Commissioner Spicer stated the plan presented incorporates what he envisioned in the south park area with a comfort station, shelter, play equipment and full sized soccer fields. Kullander explained the addition of T -ball option that would allow T -ball and -pickup softball when the soccer fields are not in use. Kullander approximated $1,500 per backstop. Commissioner Spicer stated that this would provide additional practice areas Page 5 when soccer is not in use and meets neighborhood park needs. The Commission decided to place two T - ball backstops at the north end of the soccer fields and set back 30 feet. The Parks and Recreation Commission- was of unanimous consensus that the plan presented for South Kensington Park should be recommended with the T -ball option. The Commission directed staff to discuss the design with Sting and Mend -Eagan. NORTH KENSINGTON PARK Chair Huber stated the design of the north section of Kensington Park had been the item of much discussion at the October meeting and as a result the Commission had directed Parks Project Manager Kullander to provide a menu of options for this park section and to include Hagstrom-King Park as a factor in siting park needs for this area. Kullander explained the original proposal that had been presented in October and stated this design has potential for a multi -use field. Kullander stated his original design is basically a neighborhood park in two areas, as it includes a play structure, play field, parking, trails, hard court and picnic facilities. Kullander explained the other drawing, Plan B, which includes all the options discussed last month to pick and choose from. Kullander stated this shows the park to contain an enlarged parking lot that has been moved to the west end of the park, a picnic shelter, heavier landscaping and berming, a two court tennis surface, a full court basketball, three horseshoe pits with an open grass area under the easement. Kullander stated this option shows maximum development and is not a proposal but merely an illustration of the options. Chair Huber inquired about volleyball. Kullander stated this area has unlimited development potential and could include volleyball if the Commission chose. Kullander stated that this area will contain a diverse group of residents and that eventually there will approximately -800 housing units in this afea. , Kullander stated the north park section is not' a pretty area with natural amenities. He stated it is in the noise corridor, is adjacent to traffic, has high power lines running through the property, is void of Page 6 significant vegetation and is lacking topsoil. Kullander stated it could be costly to provide extensive landscaping, trees and many years before this area would become a typical park site. He stated Mendota Heights Road will always look down upon the site. Kullander stated park funds would be best used where natural amenities already exist and shouldn't be forced into this site. Commissioner Damberg queried, what is a park? She explained a park she knew of that she considered the best park she ever visited. She stated it was a mixture of uses that attracted all segments of a community, it had athletic fields that were separated from the other areas, it had picnic areas, play areas, a flower conservatory, a fountain and tennis courts. She stated that on any given night, all generations of the community would turn out. Commissioner Damberg stated that athletic fields have dominated our parks, both the existing parks and the newly constructed parks, mostly because of financial constraints. She stated Mendota Heights should have one area that is more "park like." She also stated this may not necessarily mean Kensington Park, that Hagstrom- King Park may be more appropriate. She stated that if Kensington Park was not conducive to a green, passive park, it should not be forced to be that. Commissioner Damberg inquired about redesigning the future tennis area at Hagstrom-King Park to be something else. Kullander stated that this area had been graded flat for future use, and was not committed to tennis courts. Commissioner Damberg stated a creative approach could be used at Hagstrom-King Park. Chair Huber opened the discussion on the maximum development option for Kensington Park north, known as plan B. Kullander stated he estimated the cost for all the options at $180,000 as compared to $70,000 for the original proposal. Chair Huber polled the Commissioners. Commissioner Lundeen stated he liked the concept of T -ball with the backstops at the south area. Lundeen stated he liked Plan B, however has a hard time envisioning all those improvements on the site and getting a park like setting. Lundeen stated a landscape arboretum is the place to go to see greenery. Lundeen stated he liked the horseshoe pits. Lundeen stated the power lines take away Page 7 from any park like setting in this area. Kullander stated Plan B is similar to Marie Park where there are a lot of uses in a small area and that court fencing does not detract significantly once trees are mature. Commissioner Hunter stated he likes open spaces for parks, and that Plan B is not the passive type of park development in which people will hang out. Hunter stated Plan B would be better without the basketball. Hunter proposed volleyball with landscaping and berms to replace the basketball. Hunter favored the tennis and horseshoes. Hunter stated that Hagstrom-King is more appropriate for a "park like setting." Bocce ball was discussed. Commissioner Spicer stated the north park area is an ugly site to begin with and we shouldn't put lots of money in it. Spicer advocated an open area with picnic shelter, horseshoes and some plantings. Spicer stated the money should go into Hagstrom- King which is already an attractive area and could accommodate tennis courts. Spicer stated money would be better spent beautifying Hagstrom-King. Spicer stated Kensington is best suited as an open play field and he prefers the original plan with a shelter, horseshoes and some beautification. Tennis at Hagstrom-King was discussed. It was acknowledged that the building at the north Kensington site already had bathrooms to support active use. Commissioner Lundeen stated he prefers Plan B without the tennis and basketball, which could be placed at Hagstrom-King Park. Lundeen stated that he felt if a "park like" area was needed that Hagstrom-King is more appropriate, and ,if active type surfaces are needed than Kensington is more appropriate. Commissioner Damberg stated she preferred Plan B as a passive area without the tennis and basketball. Damberg stated she thinks Hagstrom-King is a nicer area suitable for activity with a nice overview of the pond. Commissioner Spicer stated the basketball could be taken out of Hagstrom-King with some -plantings to separate the ballfield and make Hagstrom-King Park the green area. Spicer stated the basketball could be replaced at Kensington Park. Spicer stated he liked the active use of Plan B near the existing plumbing, there will be a lot of people in this Page 8 area. Spicer stated there is an obligation to provide active surfaces for residents in this area. He stated the City needs one developed area and that the City needs one green area. Spicer stated he felt the Commission was disagreeing on which park should be the active area and which should be the green area. Spicer stated the site with the natural beauty should be left open and the ugly site should be developed for active use. Spicer stated Kensington has the facilities for active use and should be developed for active uses as shown in Plan B and that Hagstrom-King should be cleared out for open undeveloped green area with some passive amenities. Commissioner Damberg stated that adding lots of greenery to Plan B would make it more acceptable. Damberg suggested berming, landscaping, picnic, bocce ball and removing basketball at Hagstrom- King. Chair Huber stated he could not imagine tearing out the half court basketball at Hagstrom-King. The Commission discussed redesigning Hagstrom-King Parks as a passive park by providing trees, a loop trail, benches and picnic facilities. Commissioner Spicer stated that if a green area is needed for Kensington, Hampshire, Bridgeview, Copperfield and Delaware Crossing residents, a more central location than Hagstrom-King Park could not be found. Chair Huber focused the discussion on the options in Plan B. He inquired why the need for picnic shelters if this is to be the active park. The Commission discussed a few small scattered single table shelters. Commissioner Spicer stated that if Plan B is recommended it should be done in a green manner to offset the hard facilities. Commissioner Damberg stated it should be beautified because of its heavy use nature. Commissioner Spicer moved to recommend that Hagstrom-King Park be a beautified green area passive park and that the north- section of Kensington Park be developed according to Plan B with kiosk areas for picnic shelters and enhanced with green landscaping. Commissioner Damberg seconded the motion. Page 9 AYES: 4 NAYS: 1 Huber. Huber stated his nay vote was based upon the amount of active uses in Plan B. Huber stated that Plan B as a passive design with horseshoes, picnic, trails is more appropriate and the tennis and basketball can go at Hagstrom-King which is similar to the other neighborhood parks. The Commission directed staff to inform City Council of the concept design and to bring back a more detailed plan with cost estimates for review at their next meeting for the formal recommendation to City Council. The Commission discussed 1st and 2nd Question referendum monies and there purposes as relates to improvements and future land acquisition. WEST PUBLISHING SOFTBALL PROPOSAL Chair John Huber introduced the proposal that the City had received from West Publishing for a mens and womens softball league in Mendota Heights to serve their Eagan employees. Huber queried if there was any support for this among the Commissioners. Commissioner Spicer stated that the Thursday night reservation requested by West Publishing is the primary night for the Mendota Heights Softball League and it wasn't likely the City could support any Thursday night softball. Commissioner Lundeen stated he did not support the request. Chair John Huber stated this was not unlike the request to rent the concession stand. Huber stated the City really had to have a chance to develop its policies before outside interests were allowed into the program. Huber stated the City does not have a policy on use of the softball fields yet. Huber stated the answer to West Publishing ought to be there is no structure to support their request at this time. Commissioner Lundeen stated the City could not give a three year commitment to West Publishing until there are clear policies on field use. Huber inquired if the Mendakota Park fields would be playable in the Spring. Kullander stated the fields would be available for limited use and could accommodate our present softball leagues, the mens Page 10 league on Thursday night and the kittenball league on Sunday nights. The Commission directed staff to inform West Publishing there would be no accommodation until the City needs are determined first. RECREATION SURVEY/SOFTBALL POLICIES VERBAL UPDATES Administrative Assistant Batchelder handed out summary sheets briefly describing the softball policies of twenty metro area cities. Batchelder stated the City would need to develop policies regarding field use, reservation, league play, tournaments, concession rental, and fees. Batchelder stated the survey shows how other cities are handling their programs. Park brochures from metro area cities were distributed to each Commissioner. Batchelder stated proposed softball policies would be prepared for the December meeting and the Commissioners would have time to study the survey and brochures to begin discussion and establishment of softball policies for the coming season. Batchelder stated the Metropolitan Council had contacted the City about the proposed Harriet Island/Lilydale/Cherokee Park Regional Park that is once again being pushed forward by the City of St. Paul. Batchelder stated St. Paul was seeking funding from the Met Council to build this regional park and the Met Council was asking for comments as part of their public hearing procedures. Batchelder stated plans have been requested so the City can make a formal response, as was done in 1988 when this park was under consideration. Batchelder stated the heavy snow storm that we received last week may have ruined any chance that Centex's contractors would have had to rough grade Kensington Park prior to the onset of winter. Batchelder stated we will have to wait and see on the weather over the next month. He stated this should not delay the construction of Kensington Park, our intention would still be to build the park in 1992, for use in 1993. Kullander stated the Mendota Interchange project was nearing the point where the State would be letting contracts. He stated there is 1 and 1/2 mile of trails proposed, however, the cost sharing ADJOURN Page 11 is unknown at this point and some trail segments are listed as County trails. Kullander stated the City cost could be as high as $65,000, but this depends on the State and County shares. Batchelder stated he had no contact from the Mayfield Heights neighborhood after informing them the City had exhausted its options to provide a trail link to Douglas/James Road despite his offer to meet with them. The Victoria realignment and its trail were discussed. There being no further business, the Parks and Recreation adjourned their meeting at 9:30 o'clock p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kevin Batchelder, Admin. Asst. To: From: Subject: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 19, 1991 Mayor, City Council and City Administrator DISCUSSION Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist Kensington Park - Concept Design Progress The Parks and Recreation Commission desires to keep the City Council apprised of the discussions and progress involving the design of Kensington Park. At their November 12, 1991 meeting the Commission decided on a preliminary design concept for recommendation to City Council, but wished to review the options they had chosen, the cost estimates and a final schematic at their December meeting prior to making the formal recommendation to City Council on preliminary plans and specifications. The attached packet includes the original concept design and the evolved drawings. The November 12, 1991 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting minutes detail the discussion of these schematics. ACTION REQUIRED There is no action required, the Parks and Recreation Commission desired to inform the City Council of progress on the design of Kensington Park and intends to make their recommendation at their December meeting. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 12, 1991 TO: Parks & Recreation Commission Members FROM: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager RE: Kensington Park Design At the October Park & Recreation meeting I presented a preliminary design plan for the development of the park land dedicated by Centex. The ideas expressed in that design were derived from many sources accumulated over the past several years. I drew heavily from recommendations of the Citizens Review Committee, comments made by members of the City Council, the Park and Recreation Commissioners and requests made by Mend -Eagan, Sibley Sting and interested residents. Site History The size of the park dedication has varied from eleven acres to twenty seven acres to the final dedication of thirteen and a half acres split into two areas, four plus acres to north and eight to the south with a connecting corridor. Design History Early use concepts envisioned two adult softball fields which became three softball fields plus two soccer fields. Currently the consensus is that the park shall contain at least one full size and one large soccer field. Additional facilities or amenities are yet to be decided upon. Site Constraints The site is bordered on the west by multi -family townhouses, on the east by singe family lots, to the south is Interstate 494 and on the north Mendota Heights Road. Bi-secting the site is a N.S.P. high wire transmission line and a six inch burial petroleum line abuts the power line easement. The center site is located in Noise Corridor Zone four. Basically the site is barren with minimal topsoil present. The northeast and northwest corners of the north park site contain a mature wooded hillside and a designated storm water retention pond. Design Elements - South Site The two soccer fields can only fit in a north/south orientation in the south park site. Tall fencing will be required behind the goals along 1-494. A parking lot for 80 to 100 cars will be necessary. Play equipment and picnic amenities could also be located in this section. A comfort station with permanent facilities was considered necessary by the Park and Recreation Commission. A trail will link the north park and areas to the east which will be developed single family. North Side Currently this area if relatively flat sloping to the future storm retention pond in the northwest corner. Existing toilet and storage facilities have been provided in the US West building on Mendota Heights Road. Design options can range from an open grass field for informal "pick-up" sports to a fully developed high use site. Both extremes are illustrated for discussion. Hagstom-King Park Easterly of the north park site, (approximately 500 feet) is the Hagstrom-King neighborhood park. This seven acre park was also dedicated and partially developed by Centex. The City added additional improvements in 1990 which included a youth size (220' outfield) softball field, landscaping, and rough grading. To compliment the final "package" of amenities the City may construct at the Kensington Park which may include additional facilities here which could include some or all of the following: 1. Tennis courts 2. Volleyball courts 3. Picnic amenities 4. Enlarged basketball 5. Expanded trails Funding Adequate funding is available, to construct all of the improvements so far discussed at the Park and Recreation meetings using the second question funding bf $700.000.00 and possibly some funds from the special park fund. Next Step Determine what facilities are required and where they will be located. Develop final preliminary plans for presentation to City Council. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ James Danielson, Public Works November 15, 1991 irector SUBJECT: Mendota Plaza Sign Criteria Amendment INTRODUCTION Mr. Edward Paster, owner of the Mendota Plaza, has been working diligently to try and find a tenant for the easterly 20,000 square feet of his shopping center. On Thursday of this week Mr. Paster informed City staff that he has landed a tenant for the space, contingent upon City approval of the required store signage. DISCUSSION Over the past several years, Mr. Paster has worked tirelessly to find a tenant for the vacant space. He has attempted to replace the Country Club Market with another grocery store, but has been unsuccessful. Council may recall that he also was very close to having a movie theater occupy the space within the past year. Mr. Paster now has located a home furnishings type store called the "Old America Store". Old America sells many of the same types of items found at Pier I, including glassware, brass, silk flowers, picture frames, wicker, etc. Old America currently has two stores in the Twin Cities area, one in northeast Minneapolis and another in New Hope. Nationwide Old America has a total of 55 stores, and is headquartered out of Dallas, Texas. Old America officials have indicated they will commit to occupying the space only if they are allowed suitable signage on the front of the building. Attached please find a copy of their proposed sign detail. The sign dimensions of 58 feet 3 inches by 5 feet do not fit the shopping center sign criteria as approved by the City Council in 1988. That sign criteria allows for a maximum letter height of 3 feet. Mr. Paster designed the sign criteria himself and admits that it was designed without consideration for the one large tenant space on the east. It was designed for the standard 40 foot store fronts, not the large space that the Old America Store is considering renting. Mr. Paster indicates that when the space was occupied by Country Club Market, their signage was in excess of the specified 3 foot maximum. RECOMMENDATION The proposed signage would be placed in the "sign band" which is part of the shopping center facade. The existing sign band is 5 feet 6 inches in height, thus staff is concerned that a 5 foot high letter will overly crowd the overall appearance of the shopping center. We have discussed this matter with Mr. Paster, and he has agreed that a 4 foot high letter will be adequate. With this change, it is our recommendation that Council approve the installation of the Old America Store sign with the dimensions not to exceed 58 feet 3 inches by 4 feet. ACTION REQUIRED Review the amended sign proposal with Mr. Paster, and if Council desires to implement the recommendation, Council should pass a motion approving the Old America Store sign proposal with the dimensions not to exceed 58 feet 3 inches by 4 feet. MTL/JED:kkb PAGE.003 w ce cew z w w 0 L • • Yr -717J A9/ S '921, iie.t?a71/4/7 • p.. ,..is. .,4. t• • T1 MENDOTA PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER AUGUST/1988 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN. SIGN CRITERIA PASTER ENTERPRISES "EXHIBIT D" /tRy eeu444_ 1 DETAILS B. EXTERIOR SIGNAGE 1. Tenant's signs shall be store identity signs only. The use of coat of arms, shields or other logos 0.11 be permitted, if approved. 2. Tenants will be restricted to copy which will designate the Tenant's proper name, product and/or service. 3. Multiple or repetitive signing may be allowed provided the area -of such signing conforms to the limitations set forth herein. 4. Tenants will be allocated an area on the exterior of the shopping center for their signs. This area will be part of a continuous fascia band 6'-0" in height. 5. Tenant's sign shall'be restricted to an area on the exterior fascia band, which shall not be higher than 1'-6" from the top edge of the fascia band, and not lower than 1!-6" from the bottom edge of the fascia band. If all caps are used, letters shall not exceed 36" in height. If upper and lower case script is used, capitals may be 32" and the body of lower case may not exceed 20". Ascenders and descenders of lower case letters may not exceed a total of 36" in height. 6. The maximum length of Tenant's sign copy shall not be nearer than 24" to the edge of the Tenant's Lease line and shall not exceed 33'-0" in length. 7. Letter styles of Tenant copy will be determined by the Tenant. Tenant's sign copy must be individual illumi- nated neon letters and/or logos, the face of which shall be cut out of transparent or opaque plastic. Color shall be Red #2423 by Allied Plastics Inc. Letters shall be edged with gold silvatrim or edgebrite. Returns are to be white. 8. The sign attachment devices must be non -corrosive fasten- ers per details enclosed within this criteria. EXPLANATION A. GENERAL 1. It is intended that the signing of the stores at the MENDOTA PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER shall be developed in an imaginative and varied manner. The criteria herein below set forth shall govern. 2. Although previous and current signing practices of the Tenant will be considered, they will not govern signs to be installed at MENDOTA PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER. 3. Approval of store design drawings or working drawings and specifications for Tenant's leased premises does not constitute approval of any sign work. Landlord's. written approval of Tenant's sign drawing and specifications is required. 4. The furnishing and installation of a sign and that costs incurred shall be the responsibility of the Tenant. Sign construction is to be completed in compliance with the instruction contained within this brochure. 5. Each Tenant will be required to identify its premises by a sign. 4 DETAILS C. SUSPENDED UNDERCANOPY SIGNS 1. Tenants will be required to install one (1) illumi- nated undercanopy sign. 2. All undercanopy signs are required to have a clearance of 8'-6" from the existing sidewalk. The length of undercanopy signs shall be 5'-0". 3. All sign attachment devised must be non -corrosive materials. Electrical connections, if applicable, are to be concealed within the sign cabinet. D. FRONT DOOR SIGNING 1. Tenants will be required to identify their front entry door with their address number in 3" decals. 2. Number style is restricted to "Alternate Gothic", •black reflective. E. REAR DOOR SIGNING 1. No form of rear door signing shall be allowed except as hereunder provided. 2. Tenant will be allowed to identify their rear delivery door with their address number in 3" decals. . Number style is restricted to "Alternate Gothic black reflective. PROHIBITED SIGNS F. The following types of signs or sign components shall be PROHIBITED: 1. Sign's employing exposed raceways, ballast boxes or transformers. 2. Moving or rotating signs. 3. Sign's employing moving or flashing lights. 4. Individual illuminated sign cabinets with painted plastic faces. 5. Signs employing luminous, vacuum -formed type plastic letters. 6. Signs, letters,.symbols or identification of any nature painted directly on surface's exterior to the premises. 7. Signs employing unedged or uncapped plastic letters or letters with no returns and exposed fastenings. 8. Cloth, wood, paper or cardboard signs, stickers, decals or painted signs around or on exterior surfaces (doors and/or windows) of the premises. 9. Free-standing signs. 10. Rooftop signs. 11. Signs employing noise -making devices and components. 12. Signs exhibiting the names, stamps or decals of the sign manufactureror installer. SIGN APPROVAL G. Procedures for obtaining approvals for sign drawings: 1. Prior to the commencement of construction of any sign, Tenant shall submit drawings and specification for the proposed sign work. Four (4) sets of draw- ings will be required by Landlord. The drawings shall clearly show the location of sign on fascia of building, graphics, color and construction and attachment details. 2. Landlord shall return one (1) set of the sign draw- ings as soon as possible to the Tenant. The draw- ings will either be marked "Approved as Noted" or "Disapproved". Sign drawings.that have been disap- proved are to be redesigned and resubmitted to Landlord for approval within seven (7) days of receipt by Tenant.', NOV 14 '91 14:00 FROM PASTER ENTERPRISES PAGE.003 9-16-88 ADDENDUM TO: MENDOTA PLAZA SIGN CRITERIA Change Item 16 under Section B. Exterior Signage Details to read: "The maximun length of Tenant's sign copy shall not be nearer than 24" to the edge of Tenant's lease line." CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council, City Adminis FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Contractor Licensing INTRODUCTION November 13, 1991 For several years, the Builder's Association of Minnesota and other groups have strenuously lobbied the legislature to adopt legislation requiring statewide licensing of contractors. The lobbying was successful in the last session: Chapter 306 was adopted to amend current laws and require state licensing. The provisions will become effective on January 2nd. The legislation has a significant affect on City licensing policy because local authorities are prohibited from licensing trades which require state licenses. Council direction on continued City licensing of trades is necessary at this time so that City policy can be amended prior to the implementation of Chapter 306. In addition, a number of current licensees have called regarding the need to renew bonds or insurance which are due to expire before the first of the year. Direction on whether to continue or suspend those requirements is also necessary. INFORMATION Oftentimes, new legislation raises more questions than it provides answers. This is certainly the case with the licensing chapter. Under the new regulations, a "licensee" is defined as a residential building contractor (those who construct dwellings under four units), remodelers, or specialty contractors licensed under the statute provisions. A "remodeler" is defined as a contractor who contracts to do two or more special skills for a consumer. Unfortunately, the legislation does not define "specialty contractors," but rather states that the Commissioner of Commerce must recommend which types of "one -skill" competency or single special skill groups must be licensed as specialty contractors. The Commissioner must report recommended types of specialty groups to the legislature by January 31st. State licenses for specialty contractors will be required in 1993. I have attached the City's licensing ordinance for your review and information. As you will note, the City currently licenses many trades. The only trades exempted from the statute are mechanical contractors, on-site sewage treatment system excavators and specialty contractors which the legislature in its next session will determine are not required to be licensed. It is anyone's guess at this time which specialty trades will be required to have state licenses. All we know for certain at this time is that the City can continue to license contractors who construct commercial buildings or residential structures with four or more units and single -trade contractors. We can also continue to license mechanical contractors (heating, air conditioning, gas piping) . State contractor licensing is in a sense a mixed blessing for the City. On the negative side, the City will lose considerable revenue. Should Council elect to discontinue all licensing, the City will lose nearly $13,000. We had only sketchy information about the state regulations prior to preparation of the proposed 1992 budget, therefore it does not include any revenue projection for licenses. We are required to place the contractor's license number on all building permits issued - and must contact the state to confirm the license before issuing a permit. The statute allows cities to require a $5.00 surcharge on all building permits to defray the cost of confirming state licenses. On the positive side, homeowners should be better protected. Every contractor licensed by the state must pass a competency test and participate in continuing education. The Commissioner is empowered to revoke, suspend or deny licenses if a contractor has been found to have engaged in fraudulent or dishonest practices or has been shown to be incompetent or financially irresponsible or makes false statements on the license application. Contractors will be required to be bonded and insured. DISCUSSION I have long been a proponent of City licensing of contractors because licensing provides at least a small measure of protection for homeowners. I continue to be a proponent of licensing. City ordinance requires bonding and insurance, and also provides that, after public hearing, Council may deny, revoke or suspend licenses for cause. Contractors against whom such action is taken may not perform work in the City. Until legislative action is taken, we will not know for certain which trades we can license beyond 1992. In 1993 it is likely that only commercial building contractors, mechanical and gas piping, fencing, sign, sprinkler, pool and tree removal contractors, and possibly asphalt contractors will be eligible for city licensing. Licenses were issued to 272 non -general contractors during the first three quarters of this year. If the City continues to license these trades in 1992, approximately $6,800 in licensing revenue would be realized and homeowners will continue to receive the protection provided by insurance and bonding. Perhaps the most significant incentive for continued licensing is the protection of employees of the licensees, since the City ordinance requires proof of workers' compensation. Additionally, the City would retain the right to refuse to allow a contractor • to work in the community for non-compliance with building and/or zoning codes. At my request, Maria has surveyed neighboring communities to see whether they plan to continue licensing. West St. Paul and Inver Grove Heights plan to continue licensing all trades except general contractors until they are notified of the exempted specialty contractors. Eagan rescinded its licensing ordinance after the state licensing legislation was adopted. Burnsville and Apple Valley do not require contractor licenses. Assuming that I have sufficiently confused the issue, I will now present Council with a request for direction. I will also provide alternatives and/or recommendations for consideration. 1. Should staff require continuation certificates for bonds and insurance for currently licensed general contractors whose bonds and insurance will expire before December 31st? Recommendation: License bonds are not pro -rated. They are written for a full year and are costly. Dick Gill has confirmed that his office has not received any citizen complaints against any of the currently licensed contractors. Absent any citizen complaints, I see little point in requiring continuation certificates for a full year when our license can only be effective through December 31st. I recommend that the bond and insurance provisions be waived for general contractors and remodelers for the remainder of the year. 2. Should the City continue to require licenses in 1993 for contractors who are not general contractors or remodelers, knowing that the state licensing will be expanded in 1993. Recommendation I recommend that the City continue to require licenses for all non-exempt trades through 1993, and amend the licensing ordinance at this time to eliminate licensing only for general contractors. If Council wishes to continue requiring trade licenses in future years, it would be premature at this time to exempt any contractors other than general contractors and remodelers. ACTION REQUIRED Council should review and discuss the foregoing information and take one of the following courses of action: 1. Determine that it does not wish to continue licensing contractors, and direct staff to prepare the appropriate ordinance rescinding the contractor licensing ordinance. or and or Determine that contractor licensing is desirable and direct staff to prepare an amending ordinance to exempt residential general contractors and remodelers from the licensing provisions. and Direct staff to revise the City's fee schedule to require a $5.00 surcharge on building permits, effective on January 2, 1992, to defray the cost of verifying state licenses. Move to suspend the requirement for new licenses and for continuation certificates for bonds and insurance for currently licensed general contractors and remodelers. 2. Direct staff to continue to require new licenses and continuation certificates for licensed general contractors through December 31, 1991. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO No ember 13, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Trunk Highway 13 Bridge Replacement Project Job No. 9123 Improvement No. 91, Project No. 7 DISCUSSION: I was recently informed by Mn/DOT at a design coordination meeting about the latest developments concerning the upgrading of the Trunk Highway 13 Bridge over I -35E. This project also in- cludes the approach areas and the realignment of Victoria Road, which is to be realigned to be located westerly of the old Stand- ard Station site (see attached map). Funding for the realigning of Victoria Road was to be by Mn/DOT for the road construction costs and by Dakota County for the right-of-way acquisition costs. At this recent meeting I learned that there will also be some City costs. The City will be charged utility adjustment costs for watermains and sanitary sewers that need to be lowered, manholes that need adjustments, fire hydrants that need to be relocated etc. We estimate these utility costs to be approximately $30,000. I recommend that the City pursue two sources of funding to cover these costs: 1. Dakota County Victoria Road is County Road 45 and Dakota County normally pays 55% of the costs for any utility adjust- ments required as a result of upgrading county roads. I have already submitted this request to the County. 2. Municipal State Aid (MSA) Although Victoria Road is a county road, the City has designated it an MSA route north of Marie Avenue and those utility adjustment costs could be eligible for MSA funding. MSA rules do not specifically allow for payment of utility adjustments, however Elmer Morris, our State Aid Engineer, told me that if I submitted a written request he would attempt to get it -approved. I have sent him that request. i Trail As part of the Park Bond Referendum a trail was planned for along the east side of Victoria. Because of narrow right-of-way and steep side slopes along Victoria's new alignment a trail can not be constructed there. The new trail would continue to follow the existing Victoria align- ment. Funding for this trail would be by Park Bond Referen- dum. Mn/DOT requires that the City adopt a resolution requesting that the trail construction be included with their project and agreeing to City funding of its costs. Temporary Easement Dakota County is acquiring the right-of-way for this project and as part of that work they have discovered that Caren Road was not constructed on platted right-of-way (the City owns fee title to the land). The County therefore feels that they need a construction easement from the City to complete work in this area (see attached). RECOMMENDATION: With respect to Mn/DOT Project No. 1982-112 and 1902-42 I recommend the following: 1. That the City pursue County and MSA funding for the utility adjustments required. 2. That Mn/DOT, as part of this project, construct an 8' wide bituminous trail on the east side of Victoria Road beginning north of Diane Road and extending northerly until its intersection with Trunk Highway 13. 3. That the City grant a temporary construction easement to Dakota County for the work on Caren Road. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 91- , RESOLUTION REQUESTING THAT THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN- CLUDE A TRAIL ALONG VICTORIA ROAD AS PART OF STATE PROJECT 1902- 42, and a motion to authorize the Mayor to execute the attached, - temporary easement on behalf of the City. JED:dfw City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 91 - RESOLUTION REQUESTING THAT THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INCLUDE A TRAIL ALONG VICTORIA ROAD AS PART OF STATE PROJECT 1902-42 WHEREAS, Minnesota Department of Transportation is currently preparing plans to improve Victoria Road (County Road 45) at its intersection with Trunk Highway 13, construction to begin in Spring of 1992; and WHEREAS, Mendota Heights desires to have an 8 foot wide bituminous trail constructed along the east side of Victoria Road as part of its overall trail plan; and WS, Mendota Heights agrees to fund the costs for the trail. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the. City of Mendota Heights that Mendota Heights formally requests the Minnesota Department of Transportation to include, as part of State Project 1902-42, an 8 foot wide bituminous trail extending from the north side of Diane Road to Trunk Highway 13. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 19th day of November, 1991. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TEMPORARY EASEMENT File No. 9 13 S.A.Project No. C.S.A.H. No. County Project No. 45-02 County Road No. 45 Parcel No. 12(119) Know all men by these presents, that the undersigned, hereinafter called GRANTOR in consideration of the sum of One and No/100 Dollars($ 1.00 ) hereby grants and permits the County of Dakota, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Minnesota, GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, the right to construct a back or embankment slope in accordance with the construction plans on file in the office of the Dakota County Highway Department for the general improvement and protection of Co. Rd. / C.S.A.H. No. 45 , on the following described property in the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota: Parcel 12(119) in Part Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 Tilsen's Highland Heights on Dakota County Road Right of Way Map No. 119 filed for record in the Office of the Dakota County Recorder. Parcel contains approximately 2,745 square feet. And the said GRANTOR does agree and hereby grant the right to the County of Dakota for the term of this of this easement to excavate, remove and retain all structures, trees, shrubs, grass, aggregate, herbage or other materials thereon for use in the construc- tion of said highway or for any other purpose that the County may deem fitting, and said materials shall become the property of the County. And the said GRANTOR does agree with and accept the construction policy of Dakota County Highway Department, with regard to topsoil, fences and trees, which is available for public inspection at the County Highway Department Office and which is incorporated herein by reference. And the GRANTOR releases the County of Dakota, its officers and agents, from any and all liability and claims therefore con- cerning said premises that result or may result therefrom by virtue of the construction of said slope and highway and all wodc in con- nection therewith. The consideration herein includes full payment for any and all costs incurred by Grantor in replacing lost or disturbed property irons. • three This easement shall be effective, to the earliest of, a date ism years from the date of execution or until six months after comple- tion of this project. Dated this day of , 19 T DRAWING 1 P 1 / / o0 BEG. S.P. 1902-4 ` /O'Ao I/ co •' vi \ ,i- --.�_ ti \\ END S.P. 1982-112 (35E•390) �— n/ •00 --- DRAWING 2 l am — \ \ r0 p 0 \\ �/r \// 17) 101 BR. NO. 1907' '1 DRAWING 3 BEG. CONSTRUCTION • 'O ./ GENERAL LAYOUT 02-42 (13 ..194) Sheet No. z of Sheets 1/ / I/ \I DRAWING 1 / / \ C„",) 1 I ` BEG. S.P. 1902-42 (13-194) `-/! ` 'te l vr • CO / -►., "-- / r /r A;q / 1501 Nati / v. Nq� t. / rr / // / r� �� / // �/ / / / i:4pQ00 DRAWING 2 l / / % x90 /1 °0 END S.P. 1982-112 (35E-390) r. 13 WB2REV BR. NO. 1907' T r�1VC- DRAWING 3 /lam/ / /1 f pr7o VicToQ,4 ,i-ctf r,) by, E-# -1 r / • 1 (v c. RAMP 3 BEG. CONSTRUCTION f" \N l' rt VICTORIA RD. RAMP 4 J/ i GENERAL LAYOUT State Pro j . No. 1902 -42 (13-194) Sheet No. z of Sheets CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis SUBJECT: Air Noise Mitigation Part 150 Program November 14, 1991 INTRODUCTION For several years now we have been encouraged by reports that the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) will be receiving funds from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to address off - airport noise mitigation problems around MSP. The federal program being tapped for these funds is known as the Federal Aviation Regulation Part 150 Program, and it now appears that the first funds from the program will be available to spend in 1992. A number of issues need to be addressed in anticipation of receiving these funds, hence the purpose of this memo. BACKGROUND The Part 150 funds are distributed annually by the FAA on a competitive basis to various airports around the nation. For those airports awarded Part 150 funds, various restrictions apply to the expenditures made under the program. The rules of the game, as dictated by the FAA, require that the funds be spent only within the LDN 65 Contour (see attached map) and that the funds be expended in strict accordance with a previously approved implementation plan. Over the past several months, the MAC has been working with the various Cities surrounding MSP to develop the implementation plan for 1992. Two educational workshops were hosted by the MAC at Sibley High School to inform eligible residents on the status of the Part 150 Program (see attached summary of October 9th's meeting). Based on the needs identified, the MAC program has three basic components: 1. Sound Insulation Program 2. Purchase Guarantee Program 3. Land Acquisition Program Additional information on these three programs is attached (see colored pages). The use of any or all of the programs, and the prioritization of funding recipients within any of the programs, is left to the discretion of each individual City. FUNDING The most important issue surrounding the Part 150 Program is obviously the amount of money available to spend. Due to the competitive distribution, the specific dollar amount for MSP is unknown, but it is currently anticipated that the 1992 funds will be approximately $4 million. In 1993, the MAC has indicated they will apply to the FAA for approximately $10 million. The next issue which logically follows involves the distribution of these annual funds to each of the five eligible Cities: Minneapolis, Richfield, Bloomington, Eagan and Mendota Heights. Note that St. Paul is not an eligible City because it has no homes included within the LDN 65 Contour. Over the strenuous objections of Mendota Heights and Eagan, the chosen distribution formula is heavily weighted towards the number of households located within the LDN 65 Contour. We were successful in arguing for a "base allocation" for each City prior to applying the household distribution percentage. To illustrate, in 1992 the approximate fund distribution will be as follows: Est. $4 Million Mendota Allocation Mpls. Bloom. Richfield Hts. Eagan Percent of Contour Total Population 58.2 19.7 18.6 2.3 1.2 Two Percent Alloc. 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 Alloc. of Balance 2,095,200 709,200 669,600 82,800 43,200 Total City Alloc. $2,175,200 $789,200 $749,600 $162,800 $123,200 Using a similar distribution formula, and assuming the MAC is successful in its application for $10 million next year, in 1993 Mendota Heights will have available approximately $407,000. Thus, we as a City are faced with the question, how should we spend our annual funding allotment to best address the noise mitigation problem? ALTERNATIVES In reviewing the attached LDN 65 Contour Map, itis clear that very few Mendota Heights neighborhoods are encompassed by the LDN 65 noise metric. Council has in the past discussed the short comings of the LDN measuring technique, and all Cities around MSP agree that the LDN is a poor yardstick for measuring the air noise problem. Nonetheless, the FAA still endorses the LDN metric, and since they are the agency "writing the check" under the Part 150 Program, LDN 65 is the accepted standard. The most concentrated area encompassed by LDN 65 within Mendota Heights is the Furlong Addition, with some 34 dwelling units. Other scattered homes eligible for funding are located along Pilot Knob Road, Roger's Road, Lexington Avenue and Wagon Wheel Trail. Various options available to assist homeowners in these areas include: 1. Utilize funds received each year to sound insulate as many homes as possible. The MAC estimates each sound mitigation package will cost between $15,000 and $25,000. Thus, in 1992 we would be able to insulate 6 to 10 homes. Some type of prioritization system would have to be developed to chose who goes first. 2. Utilize the properties. acquire 1 or again have prioritizing Furlong area funds to voluntarily acquire eligible Depending on costs, we would only be able to 2 properties in 1992. In addition, we would to address the very difficult issue of the incremental acquisition of homes in the 3. Bank the funds for 1992 in anticipation of combining these funds with those received in future years. As the City's annual allocation increases, eventually a pool of money would be available to voluntarily acquire residential areas in total. ACTION REQUIRED By late December/early January, the City will need to let the MAC know our tentative game plan for using the Part 150 funds. Activity between now and then could include additional staff research, MAC input, public hearings, etc. to better inform Council on this issue. Council should offer staff some direction on how to proceed on this issue. MTL:kkb �1LLGLIIi•�I!llP UU 11iA1P111SIPIIT NIME€LH1II4LI P ll. lri/1 sI �I,IIIsrI�,,;�r► IIIIflhiIGco� i�iLLiLii�I11 IUIIIIIR tLLL��B IU'I!II1"� IIIIII d1111111111PaPPPIAII ,, :PIPE �ffiiiiinammir9 IIIIIIIIl11m__\� unukTiirro l 1mi� a IIIIIIIPIIIIo1A�. 'rim e...:'�■A iLk'" 11\�L�f�®L11Yi /A011=1111111111. 11111 IIIIILI131NIP UlII111' III11I111► 11!1V11111V rrr.II II: °�llll llll 111 ll •�oMIllll►.agglllld 1411111160411116:F 1ILILLL /IrILIIII r\11191,111i II f1•li•il�l• nt.'r 9\.1/t_ IP%la› .c T lily ■eM4 :Bili 6'd0e, iin 111119 M11�� 1101% a �i 041111111� ® 111! bV kii 1111111111111�1i11111�. M .. yi1b G®1 111111.111111 911 s i 7 ii11!PI.._ 11.11111 1§11 bill /1111 ?i? . EILiQiELIMI 1111 11r11■11#�111�' 'I 1 x 11i1111011i•und11!/ .1 � 111111N1 11111il p111111i 111y411 �1(II Ir11IIF•11.1�1 11/' i Int�iet •PitIRGIIME11 11111111111111111/A In 1,, ll ,PtinuB�:f 4 ■�11►imi1!111i is , mfitiar----,1 isaigar- ko_ _ = --_1„... lifilK ��11 111Efil .11.11:a ,..1 SLI 11311112i4,millorill11311112i4,111111 .I iuueuiIGn111111111IIti�'11I1k , .I11 1 gra tomourn.... oniniet Minneapolis—S --4Ltt N Source: August HNTB Analysis August 1991 Paul International Airport • Part 150 Study 2000 4000 1000 3C Scale In 5000 Preliminary 1996 Ldn Noise Contours UIIIGAN W. CIRCL `VERONICA L A. Y u VAIL. 4 v1CTORIA CTORIA KAY AVE. 32 PI 49, • O C d egZ O 0 J Z 2 PQM CURLEY 81. VD. UDEN AVE • ►i.M R73• Q4 333 TRAPP AVf CITY -SPECIFIC PART 150 EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOP II 1.1.1814k. ►A. CITIES OF EAGAN/MENDOTA HEIGHTS OCTOBER 9, 1991 GENERAL QUESTIONS/COMMENTS Eagan / Mendota Heights October 9, 1991 Attendance: approximately 50 Jon Hohenstein - Eagan Tom Lawell - Mendota Heights The residents from both Eagan and Mendota Heights seemed to be well informed about the programs and were concerned about the appraisal process and when implementation would begin. General questions asked at the workshop: 1. My house is on two acres of land, how will you appraise my property? 2. My house is sitting on land that's just been rezoned commercial, how will it be appraised? 3. Is the airport going to decide how much my house is worth? 4. Will you use the tax assessment to determine the fair market value? 5. Why don't you quit fooling around and just buy the houses and let the people move? If I want to sell my house why do I have to go through this period of trying to sell if myself? Why can't you just buy it? 6. Why are you bothering to sound insulate these houses? If the airport expands it just means there's going to be more noise. It's just throwing good money after bad. 7. How are you going to appraise vacant lots? 8. What do you expect to do with only $190,000 per year? Is that the funding level for all future years? This will take forever! 9. If you would make the airplanes fly where they are supposed to then your contours and estimated impacts might be right. The airplanes don't go where you say they do. Does your program include any mechanism for enforcing flight track compliance? 10. My concern is the availability of funding for Eagan, as well as the ability to sell my home. Others have tried in our neighborhood to sell and were unable. 11. Children are unable to sleep days the airplanes are heavy over our area. It is virtually impossible to view T.V. during peak hours. Middle of the night flights even shake the house. Can't the airlines purchase quieter aircraft and follow say Hwy. 55 where residential areas are lessened. Page 5 of 10 Draft 10-17-91-AvPlan SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM DEFINITION * Intended to retain "residential" status of land use. * Voluntary program for homeowners residing within 1996 Ldn 65 contour. * Priority: single and multi -family residences, schools. * "Block by Block" implementation. * City will be responsible for selecting and prioritizing blocks for program participation. * A recommended sound insulation modification package will be drafted for each home. Ldn 75 15 db reduction package Ldn 75,70 10 or 15 db reduction package Ldn 70,65 5 or 10 db reduction package ($25,000 max.per home) ($22,500 avg.per home) ($15,500 avg.per home) * Type of sound insulation modification packages determined by: Exterior noise level Construction type of house Window/wall area ratio * Homeowners can modify recommended packages, construction products (windows, doors). select contractors and * Air conditioning and ventilation will be included in program modifications. * Signing of an Avigation "Release". * MAC will contract with a central agency to administer the program among the 5 participating cities. • O 0 4441 pAsi, LAND ACQUISITION PROGRAM DEFINITION * Intended to change existing residential land use to either airport or non-residential use. * Either voluntary or condemnation program for homeowners residing within 1996 Ldn 65 contour. * 'Block by Block" implementation. * City will be responsible for selecting and prioritizing blocks for program participation. * Program includes payment or reimbursement of moving/relocation expenses in addition to "fair market value" reimbursement. * Avigation Easement to deed. u//4 44 0A-2( . PURCHASE GUARANTEE PROGRAM DEFINITION Intended to retain "residential" status of land use. Voluntary program for homeowners residing within 1996 Ldn 65 contour. Only "owner -occupied" homes with a minimum of 2 years owner residency. "House by House" implementation. City will be responsible for selecting (program participation and eligibility) and prioritizing homes for program participation. Participating homeowner is guaranteed "fair market value" reimbursement. Sound insulation modifications are included. Process for eligible homes: Fair market appraisal process Determine length of time home will be marketed before homeowner is reimbursed. Signing of "Letter of Intent". * SCENARIO 1: House sells before predetermined period. Normal real estate transaction (with Avigation Release to new owner) New owner is given sound insulation modifications. * SCENARIO 2: House doesn't sell before predetermined period. Original homeowner is reimbursed fair market value. Home is taken off market and given sound insulation modifications. Home is re -appraised. . . Home is re -listed on market and sold to new owner (with Avigation Release). CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ SUBJECT: Establishment of Air Noise Litigation Escrow Fund November 15, 1991 INTRODUCTION At our October 15, 1991 meeting, Mayor Mertensotto presented the concept of creating an air noise litigation fund (ANLEF) to address our City's continued concern with aircraft noise. Mayor Mertensotto has drafted the attached resolution formally establishing ANLEF for consideration by the City Council this evening. DISCUSSION City efforts to combat the air noise problem have been ongoing for over ten years. As discussed in the Braslau/Collette report issued in 1989, during that time many changes have occurred at MSP which have very negatively impacted property owners within Mendota Heights. Our work on the Blue Ribbon Task Force in 1990 resulted in a revised corridor test procedure which was flown for 60 days late last summer. The flight data for this test period are currently being compiled for review early next year, but regardless of whether or not the revised corridor procedure is made permanent, our noise exposure will continue to be unacceptable. ACTION REQUIRED Council should review the terms of the attached resolution, and if acceptable, consider adoption of Resolution No. 91 - A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS AIR NOISE LITIGATION ESCROW FUND. MTL:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 91 - A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS AIR NOISE LITIGATION ESCROW FUND WHEREAS, the southern portion of Mendota Heights continues to experience repeated overflights on the same heading for hours at a time; and WHEREAS, the Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport exists for the economic benefit of the entire metropolitan area and the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the creation of an air carrier hub has led to intense periods of departure activity not present when the corridor, which is now known as the Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor, was first implemented by the City of Eagan in 1972; and WHEREAS, the rapid growth in air traffic has outstripped the Federal Aviation Administration's ability to limit air traffic to the original centerline heading upon which the corridor was implemented; and WHEREAS, it is unreasonable and inequitable that Mendota Heights residents should be asked to accept the repeated overflights created by the turn restriction and resultant hinge effect in the air traffic control system for Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport; and WHEREAS, the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990, requiring an all Stage III fleet nationally by 1999, and the federal PART 150 Program, are long range noise mitigation strategies; and WHEREAS, the recent air corridor test failed --to provide meaningful noise relief for Mendota Heights residents from repeated overflights by departing aircraft for prolonged periods of time; and WHEREAS, the number of takeoffs and landings at Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport are at least 70 percent higher today than the number of operations in 1972, and it is unrealistic to confine takeoffs to a 15 degree corridor during peak departure periods; and WHEREAS, a southern corridor boundary has been -defined, depicted, and defended since 1973; and WHEREAS, the immutability of the south corridor boundary, together with magnetic declinations, has pushed simultaneous departures well beyond an imaginary 15 degree corridor; and WHEREAS, all air carrier jets departing to the west from 29L and 29R are given fanned headings which eliminates repeated overflights, and the FAA has no objection to similar fanning of headings for aircraft departing to the southeast on runways 11R and 11L; and WHEREAS, a significant number of Mendota Heights residents are demanding that their governing council become more positive and assertive in eliminating the noise interference with human activity caused by repeated overflights; NOW THEREFORE, the City of Mendota Heights hereby establishes an air noise litigation fund, to be known as ANLEF; and said fund is hereby created for the purpose as follows: 1. Prior to December 31, 1991, the City of Mendota Heights will submit another application to the Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for a fanned corridor test as outlined in the Braslau/Collette Corridor Study dated August 24, 1989; the purpose of the application shall be the elimination of intense noise interference caused by repeated overflights by departing aircraft during peak periods of operations at the Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport. 2. The MAC and the FAA shall be given 90 days to grant or deny the City's reapplication for a fanned corridor test. 3. In the event the MAC and the FAA deny the application, or otherwise fail to affirmatively respond within the 90 day period, then the City of Mendota Heights will consider the bringing of a declaratory judgment action against the MAC and the FAA in the United States District Court for the State of Minnesota. 4. In the event the City becomes involved in litigation against the MAC and the FAA, then ANLEF monies shall be used to defray the City's cost of litigation. 5. The City will accept contributions to ANLEF immediately upon the adoption of this resolution which establishes the fund; and said fund is hereby declared to exist for the purpose of promoting the health, welfare and safety of Mendota Heights residents. 6. All monies contributed to ANLEF shall become the exclusive property of the City of Mendota Heights, subject only to the refund provisions set forth in this resolution; and the City shall maintain an accurate record of all contributors, which record shall be open to public inspection. 7. The City of Mendota Heights may, at the exclusive and sole discretion of it governing council, deposit all ANLEF monies in an interest bearing account or invest said funds in any other manner; and all income shall become the exclusive property of the City of Mendota Heights. 8. The City anticipates generating a fund collection (ANLEF) upwards of $50,000, which funds may or may not be matched by general fund expenditures. 9. In the event the City of Mendota Heights does not receive contributions to ANLEF in the minimum amount of $25,000, then all contributed funds shall be returned to the contributor without interest. Additionally, if the City accumulates more than $25,000 in ANLEF monies, but does not commence litigation within one year from the date hereof, then all contributed funds shall also be returned to the contributors without interest. 10. Anonymous contributions, or in the event a contributor fails to notify the City of any change in mailing address, or the identity of the contributor cannot be readily identified, or the contributor fails to cash any refund check within 90 days of its date, then any such refundable amounts shall be retained by the City of Mendota Heights as its exclusive property to offset administrative expenses associated with ANLEF. 11. This resolution contains the City of Mendota Heights entire representation relative to the creation of ANLEF, its purpose and its use. ao a0 "oo (AAA-. 4. In the event the City becomes involved in litigation against the MAC and the FAA, then ANLEF monies shall be used to defray the City's cost of litigation. 5. The City will accept contributions to ANLEF immediately upon the adoption of this resolution which establishes the fund; and said fund is hereby declared to exist for the purpose of promoting the health, welfare and safety of Mendota Heights residents. 6. All monies contributed to ANLEF shall become the exclusive property of the City of Mendota Heights, subject only to the refund provisions set forth in this resolution; and the City shall maintain an accurate record of all contributors, which record shall be open to public inspection. 7. The City of Mendota Heights may, at the exclusive and sole discretion of it governing council, deposit all ANLEF monies in an interest bearing account or invest said funds in any other manner; and all income shall become the exclusive property of the City of Mendota Heights. 8. The City anticipates generating a fund collection (ANLEF) upwards of $50,000, which funds may or may not be matched by general fund expenditures. 9. In the event the City of Mendota Heights does not receive contributions to ANLEF in the minimum amount of $25,000, then all contributed funds shall be returned to the contributor without interest. Additionally, if the City accumulates more than $25,000 in ANLEF monies, but does not commence litigation within one year from the date hereof, then all contributed funds shall also be returned to the contributors without interest. 10. Anonymous contributions, or in the event a contributor fails to notify the City of any change in mailing address, or the identity of the contributor cannot be readily identified, or the contributor fails to cash any refund check within 90 days of its date, then any such refundable amounts shall be retained by the City of Mendota Heights as its exclusive property to offset administrative expenses associated with ANLEF. 11. The terms of this resolution may be amended at a public hearing during a regularly scheduled City Council meeting, and any additions, deletions, or other changes shall be by a 4/5 majority vote of its governing council. The notice for any such public hearing shall be a one time' published notice, at least two weeks in advance of the date of the public hearing in the West St. Paul Sun Current Newspaper, as a LEGAL NOTICE. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, the provisions of this resolution related to the conditions under which escrow funds shall be returned to the contributors shall not be subject to amendment. 12. This resolution contains the City of Mendota Heights entire representation relative to the creation of ANLEF, its purpose and its use. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 19th day of November, 1991. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk 12. The terms of this resolution shall only be amended at a public hearing during a regularly scheduled City Council meeting, and any additions, deletions, or other changes shall be by a 4/5 majority vote of its governing council. The notice for any such public hearing shall be a one time published notice, at least two weeks in advance of the date of the public hearing in the West St. Paul Sun Current Newspaper, as a LEGAL NOTICE. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 19th day of November, 1991. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 15, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer SUBJECT: Somerset 19 Fire Protection Improvements DISCUSSION During the past two years, several fire protection orders have been issued against the Somerset 19 property and at least two major improvements remain to be made. The residents have asked that the City provide financing for these improvements under the provisions of Chapter 429. The total cost of the projects is $24,700. We have received invoices for the work done to date, and major work yet to be done is construction of a standpipe and trash chute sprinkler system. Considering the amount of money involved, I . would recommend we self finance the project as we have done with similar small projects. The interest rate on the project would be 8 percent with allowance for prepayment up to October 1, 1992. The amount assessed would be $26,712 which would include City costs and interest until October 1. It is proposed that 10 years be allowed for the payment of the assessments. We have received a petition from 100 percent of the owners of the project, and could by resolution, approve the project and the assessment roll. A hearing covering the project could be held on December 17th and both the project and final assessment roll adopted following the hearing. ACTION REOUIRED Accept petition from property owners and call an improvement/assessment hearing to be held on December 17, 1991. LES:kkb SOMERSET 19 CONDOMINIUMS PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS To the City Council of Mendota Heights: We, all owners of real property identified as part of the Somerset 19 Condominium Development hereby petition that certain fire protection improvements which have either been installed or will be installed in our development, at the request and requirement of the City, be financed and assessed against our property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Petitioned improvements include and are limited to the following: 1) Dry standpipe construction $10 540 2) Self-closing hinges ,6-419-e- 3) Fire alarm system -,:" 2 490, 4) Heat detector system .0 6 740 5) Trash chute sprinkler system 2 440, 6) Seal garage penetrations 1 200 7) Unit smoke alarms -i., 600 1, Total 24 700 We further request that 100% of the cost of the identified improvements be equally assessed to each of our properties over a period of ten years at an annual interest rate of eight percent. We expressly waive objection to any irregularity with regard to the said improvement assessments and any claim that the amount thereof levied against owners property is excessive, together with all rights to appeal in the courts. 1) 2 ) 3) 4) Signature of Owner(s) Property Description 247.Jit4..2„, 71144) (141/2"—el-.;ze = rt krYL.' 0 Vct /-1 }4' h-(( ‘K5' 14,/ v'TL /TS NcLA Rd_ /02- qkX--,-etta ;&`3 a Somerset 19 Condominiums Petition for Local Improvement Page Two 5) 6) Signature of Owner(s) Property Description 0 4- 8) /Aiut Li 14) -QAADA ?vo 437 tu w etw u-Otif, apt- 101 £7q tJ.4.4 /'‘4,46,-e 11" !2o3 3e/ 103 Somerset 19 Condominiums Petition for Local Improvement Page Three 15) r Signature of Owner(s) Property Description KettJ. /t'1 43.E zu -4 if- 1..s. 73- ,r-TZ 16) k -u_ ll1') 17) 18) (,(//‘0--o7C-- 19) 20) 21) 22) dizotti- J i)r z zrtr-A-11--tU x(74%(/ 1'.55 S ,P(7 --,e yo , S-71 .& (20- f 5'9 .� -) r Examined, checked and found to be in proper form and to be signed by the required number of owners of property affected by the petitioned improvement. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 14, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer SUBJECT: New Furnace Installation - Kendon Lane HISTORY The City owned home at 1306 Kendon Lane is currently listed with Dave Ross Realty for sale. Before listing, the City made home repairs and clean up on the home including replacement of broken glass, installing water and sewer to the home, filling the septic system and making the furnace operative. After the furnace was started, it became apparent that there was a problem with a cracked burner which could cause backup of fumes in the home. Some minor repairs could be made, however to do a proper job and limit City liability, a new furnace should be installed. Guy has received quotes on a new gas furnace which range from $1,700 to $2,500. It will enhance the sale possibility if the new furnace is installed as well as limit our liability. ACTION REOUIRED Determine if a new furnace should be installed, and authorize staff to accept the best quote for the work. The three bids range from $1,700 to $2,500. LES:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 13, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer SUBJECT: Purchase Offer for Kendon Lane Home At the September 3, 1991 Council meeting, the Council authorized the sale of the homes at 1305 and 1306 Kendon Lane. The homes were listed with Dave Ross Realty with an exemption for the sale to Mr and Mrs. Arehart who had previously been in contact with the City. We have received a purchase offer from the Arehart's, who currently live with parents on Furlong Avenue, to purchase the home for $68,000 subject to MN HFA First Time Buyer financing. We understand that the Dakota County HRA has these funds available at a 7.97 percent rate and 2 1/2 points discount. We listed this property with Dave Ross Realty at $78,900, subject to a seven percent sales commission. By selling the property to the Arehart's, we would avoid the commission and guarantee that the property will be occupied over the winter months. For these reasons, the City Administrator and I recommend that the offer be accepted. ACTION REOUIRED Determine whether the purchase offer should be accepted and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all necessary transfer documents. LES:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 19, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Guy Kullander Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Demolition of Old Fire Station HISTORY: At the August 7, 1991 City Council meeting staff was direct- ed to seek bidders for the demolition of the old fire hall locat- ed at 2144 Dodd Road. All utilities were cut off to the building several years ago. An old well, located inside the building, will be abandoned under a separate contract following the demolition of the struc- ture. Currently the police department stores some items in a lower room which can easily be accommodated in the water tower if necessary. DISCUSSION: Bid documents were prepared and sent to demolition contrac- tors listed in the phone directory and a notice was also printed in the Sun Newspaper. The following bids were received: A. Kamish & Sons Carl Bolander and Sons $16,890.00 20,400.00 Both bidders are well known to City Staff and are considered to be reputable firms. RECOMMENDATION: Accept the bids and award the contract to A. Kamish and Sons, Inc. ACTION REOUIRED: If Council wishes to implement the recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 91- , RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION OF OLD FIRE STATION. GK:dfw City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 91 - RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION OF OLD FIRE STATION WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the proposed demolition of the old Mendota Heights Fire Station, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law and -the bids were received by the City Council at the November 19, 1991 meet- ing; and WFEREAS, the City Engineer has recommended that A. Kamish & Sons, Inc. of Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota, be declared the lowest responsible bidder. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That A. Kamish & Sons, Inc. of Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota, is hereby declared to be the lowest respon- sible bidder. 2. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver any and all contracts and documents necessary to consummate the awarding of the bid for the above described improvements to A. Kamish & Sons, Inc. of Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota. 3. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 19th day of November, 1991. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk Y -a mommiIAAAAAA City of Mendota Heights BUILDING DEMOLITION BIDDING INSTRUCTIONS AND BID FORM The City of Mendota Heights will receive sealed Bids for the demolition of a 90' by 73' concrete block building (former fire station) located at 2144 Dodd Road (Highway 149), approximately a half mile south of Highway 110. Sealed Bids will be received until 3:00 o'clock P.M., Friday, November 15, 1991. The Contract shall be awarded on the basis of the lowest total Bid. In general, the Contractor shall be required to demolish the structure, which also includes a 40 foot plus antenna mast on the roof, remove all debris from the site, remove foundation walls to a depth of three feet (3') (except south wall adjacent to adjoining building which shall be removed to a depth of one foot (1')), break up floor, fill site with good mineral soil and grade area to match slope of blacktop driveway on north side. The Contractor must also protect an existing well located inside the structure to be demolished. Following demolition of the building the City will arrange for abandoning of this well. The Contractor shall acquire all necessary permits to complete the work and maintain insurance coverage not less than the limits of liability as follows: A. Contractor's Public Liability Insurance - $1.000,000 B. Contractor's Contingent Liability Insurance - $300-500 Thousand C. Property Damage Insurance - $1,000,000 D. Automobile Insurance: 1. Bodily Injury - $300-750 Thousand 2. Property Damage - $100 Thousand The Contractor shall merge all incidental costs such as mobilization, permit fees, taxes and insurance costs into one lump sum. The City retains the salvage rights to the telephone pole located on the north side of the building. All work shall be completed on or before December 31, 1991. Work may commence after November 19, 1991, as soon as the Contractor presents proof of adequate insurance and has obtained the required permits. All Bids must be accompanied by a Cash Deposit, Certified Check or Bid Bond, made payable to the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, in an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the total 1101 Victoria Curve •Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 452.1850 Bid, conditioned that if the Bidder is the successful Bidder, he/she will enter into an Agreement with the City in accordance with said Bid. If the Bidder fails to enter into an Agreement, this deposit will be forfeited as liquidated damages to the Owner. Bids may not be withdrawn for a period of thirty (30) days after the opening of Bids. Bidder must acquaint themselves with the condition at the site of the work. Access to the building can be arranged through Mr. Guy Rullander or Mr. Jim Danielson at the City Offices. BUILDING DEMOLITION BID PROPOSAL Demolish building located at 2144 Dodd Road, removal of all debris, fill and grade site. Total Basis for Award Lump Sum $ The above is a true and sincere Bid and the Contractor hereby agrees to perform the above described work including the furnishing of all materials, labor, equipment and skill necessary to demolish the structure, remove debris, fill excavation and all incidental work which will be required or otherwise encountered as a part of the demolition operations, to be completed for the City of Mendota Heights for the price listed above. NOTE that no exceptions, additions, or, modifications to this bid proposal will be allowed. Signed Name (print) Address Phone Date ;, � �\ G C , � 0 Z/� � ��. 3� � m �� N iS P „4 m d L 0� m0 �p wv nw am r� �� sr o � �i ^I ml J. Wf , 1S.� � ��J � �� i � � �� d � �v � � ,� � �3 � o Y 0 � �L �Y 1yu� r L tF � �- � R 7" � � O � H1tlON '��. � ,, � . R � � • e a � e � p � Y � a a z � z wr � �N � O s� N y c� oQ $ y�[ H 11 < '� � '/ �:Y � � S I I 1 � . ��- ��,��, �.�� , , �,,�, � _ � �� _ � � ��// ` �" � �� , m';;, `�;,, � � �-- � ---� �� ; Z ��, „ w �/� �� 'd \�I'/((F r ,� „ �� w /, _�� / � "� , `.g� '++ ^� `1�`� y � / � ��i,---� . ��$N � � \ `U 1 �1 / 1 .��' � ( � '; ( � ¢` � � 7�- � � �, `°•' ; � `\l _�� rva�� I 1 �� II �� „ ,1��`.�\ . I I �___ \ �t� ;� �\ T \ I � . ��'�7" ��I'. : � � ~ � 1 --�- ` y.�-�� `__ ��\ - ---- -- �, / I(�\` =u" : -�'°� ,` \ -- =-=-�-= �z ° ; � '�;` .,: � _ ��-, —�"• .a 7 R c �� '�� i � � . z � � � C�*=,,v � 'S � ' � � �' .•''-'z'E ��\�� _'�� m �SN�R �:S.Si; ytI >� N .• . o! _ � � � �\ �� \\1 \ � 1�� 1 �. _ _., I�il i �-,` �� i �"" ` n � i �, i i i�� ' � '� i i i' I �I � il i l j I ' � II� � � ll� � I� � IlI � ; I � i� \�a / � I ��`v I ` I � �, f s � � � � 1 g�- � � u� I I � r= i/ —� � � � � : �/0�� N "s. \ � i + � I ��1��, i y ;� � i ' i = II � I ° i��.� �; � , � ,L � , ��: ..,�� ,�,��rr ,,. ,�,�� .�p_ .wllnn�Pr"�N� ,�., � .,�/lRili ,; �o•,,o, „o� �o' ++_'_-' 'Ng \� ,��'`�� ,e'Y�; 1p�e�a ��g � � � � �a .; „��A� � (� � ��Pd� .' � @`\`�� 'SY +\��_' ,�,` � � �� . �,. y�t��' ,�� C� tir � � o � � i W �I� `� ° � I � � ` ,� i� z � �; � � h �� I� � � II� � � il � � ___ �J a�ro2� ��n�+ i � � � � ; � � � "-� �r,,,,, .. „ N r � � r ' ` 1 `� �� =�%� =� 1� —_/ ==�f� � � ms,oiw�in � u . i� i� n ; � / �� _ 3NMA?139nH ►� � � � � , , r ��'�,/ �i/ B' �" �"`"" � � � ,—��-'- � ,�� . �/' �� / .�1, I � �> � � / / � y \\ / �,� � fd1 �� Vr�Y� ,�p S�, /J 1{'y�'�%� / � � � `. , ,.a M' J .�6i� /�� T / '/ 1 �'1,��''(g // = h � � � � � �a :�� J � M Q � � � y��- �` ' /�!� st � „ �, � �'` � 2 � V� � F' 1` � \�, ,,�j '" ,, � y� r w � �� n —`=-� N � � o�i. $ z � �+ ' • H `W—. 11 � � g % $� ,'� F 3 �� o � �1 � � ; I i Ij �� IIl.1- Ip111 �� 11Y < —� �f � �I Q- � d � � s � � Z � �� aao�oo r ,,�ir �/ 1 I 1��`� � ��J= � � � _ f\ �-� �- � � 4 M � � v N � � � a LL , � � 0 I o � � $ �� u�'I� � o 0 8- � N I omr p y� � a' N _ r ._ � < ~ � � 0. � f��8� �� a y . � a: F J � J pv�� N � � J y V k 3 v � u Hrj �1 a °� Z e PS �� '„ p y Y Yy 2p.p�ttPP -N�'i<�i a ,........_.. . _ _. . .. . . .. . ._ .. . uuuiii�uuiuuuuihiu�iiuuuiNihuiului�i � � :, � gaa�s��°.aals �� wo.;¢� w m o� � .or Q(V NCY-g^1�p - QO N4�II�lII � � / / 0 ........ ____. _._.------- -----._— . .._.___._ ...._. __... �� o 9Ro1 OFF z � � w J W � �a > t�; (� �` ` I�—.�� N Om � r Q � N � V � � a F � � � � _ I ? � � �(��A\ 1��6 �QJ` J �QG� � 3 W % _ Q J (1- � �_ ____ _ ._ � _ ..___ r�I�uYN�' Nud . . �, 'c r�IVl�lllli'-- .......... . �� I ....... ��, u191�VIINW�Wuluu�d�ummG�uuWIn7Y�N �GIII :� •� i $�8858�°sag` s_ 8� � Jl N'o rimm N d oc�' v a�t� � Q�N�-��,Mn-� NhI��I N N W � �W o °� �_ rii y' � � N N ` � v J ny. i�u 3 i- � Tw �i'� �ec z��3�$ �� u'.0 � m `�` � �� v '��' H Nn a vJ1 �� i� � 4 �� ? �LLI .> � adKp�.,�Ygy 'T�< v\U �o'�-N�` VPiP.�.a� � �.j'4i j�pa�o ,. � ;'3 lio� N[ � � �p� ��;�' .� � � r-------- ----------------------� 1 a �06£ � $ I i �£ � I � � I �I � g � �� i � �i � �� v s a i 1 ;� � y � .�E _£ ; ,oc i�R z� � I?z i --�-- — ,xc I _____' -- ___'_"'______ /� � I 1 I .. ....- � -- --- �: .... ..._ ... _.._....__ .....---------- I Illltll III,CI �l'f�l�'� ; __ _._..___ P a h � �°pz V ;�