1991-12-03CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
December 3, 1991 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption
4. Consent Calendar
a. Acknowledgment of the November Building Report.
b. Acknowledgment of the December Planning Commission
Meeting Cancellation.
c. Acknowledgment of the Clarification of Planning
Commission Meeting Minutes of October 22, 1991.
d. Approval of Jefferson Heights Plat Correction.
e. Approval of MnDOT Land Acquisition for Mendota
Interchange Project.
f. Approval of the Delinquent Sewer Resolution -
RESOLUTION NO. 91-84.
* g. Approval of the Final Plat for Pine Creek Estates -
RESOLUTION NO. 91-85.
h. Approval of the List of Contractors.
i. Approval of the List of Claims.
** j. House Fire Update - 538 Stone Road.
End of Consent Calendar
5. Public Comments
6. Hearing
a. Budget and Truth in Taxation Hearing - 7:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-86
7. Unfinished and New Business
a. Discussion on MnDOT Interchange Storm Sewer Cost Split
RESOLUTION NO. 91-87
b. Discussion on "Housekeeping" Variances.
c. Discussion on Park Dedication Fees.
d. Discussion on Zoning Administration and Policies.
e. Discussion on 1992 CDBG Grant Application.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-88
8. Council Comments
9. Adjourn
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 3, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City dministrator
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ
SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for December 3rd Council Meeting
One item has been added to the consent calendar (**).
Additional information is being submitted for item 4g. under the
consent calendar (*).
3. Agenda Adoption
It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda
printed on green paper.
4g. Approval of the Final Plat for Pine Creek Estates
Please see the Conservancy Easement submitted for Pine Creek
Acres (Knaeble Subdivision).
4j. House Fire Update - 538 Stone Road
Please see attached memos.
MTL:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
December 3, 1991 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption
4. Consent Calendar
a.
b.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
End
Acknowledgment of the
Acknowledgment of the
Meeting Cancellation.
Acknowledgment of the
Commission Meeting Minutes of October 22, 1991.
Approval of Jefferson Heights Plat Correction.
Approval of MnDOT Land Acquisition for Mendota
Interchange Project.
Approval of the Delinquent Sewer Resolution -
RESOLUTION NO. 91-84.
Approval of the Final Plat for Pine Creek Estates
RESOLUTION NO. 91-85.
Approval of the List of Contractors.
Approval of the List of Claims.
November Building Report.
December Planning Commission
Clarification of Planning
of Consent Calendar
5. Public Comments'
6. Hearing
a. Budget and Truth in Taxation Hearing - 7:30 P.M.
7. Unfinished and New Business
a. Discussion on MnDOT Interchange Storm Sewer Cost Split -
RESOLUTION NO. 91-86
b. Discussion on "Housekeeping" Variances.
c. Discussion on Park Dedication Fees.
d. Discussion on Zoning Administration and Policies.
e. Discussion on 1992 CDBG Grant Application.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-87
8. Council Comments .iloSataiA60.4
9. Adjourn
MEMO
Date: 11-25-91
T0: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer
SUBJECT: Building Activity Report for November 1991
CURRENT MONTH
YEAR TO DATE 91 YEAR TO DATE 90
BUILDING
PERMITS: No. Valuation Fee Collected No. Valuation Fee Collected No. Valuation Fee Collected
SFD 12 1,716,618.00 15,680.49 72 11,297,501.00 99,838.24 72 11,785,923.00 101,992.69
APT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0____ 0
TOWNHOUSE 1 10,115.00 193.05 6 573,760.00 5,817.10 6 716,694.00 6,922.59
CONDO 10 723,876.00 4,473.98 38 3,037,637.00 19,342.15 16 1,278,376.00 8,116.36
MISC. 25 99,980.00 1,832.70 240 1,710,513.00 29,043.84 219 1,682,413.00 30,346.56
C/I 4 66,819.00 1,023.83 49 9,604,849.00 50,053.78 44 5,435,358.00 35,567.05
Sub Total 52 2,617.408.00 23,204.05 405 26,224,260.00 204,095.11
TRADE
PERMITS:
357 20,898,764.00 182,945.25
Plumbing 10 345.00 134 5,311.00 120
Water 19 95.00 156 780.00 113
Sewer 17 297.50 131 2,485.00 104
Heat, AC,
& Gas 32 1,855.50 198 14,457.50 157
5,666.00
565.00
1,820.00
16,891.85
Sub Total 78 2,593.00 619 23,033.50 494
Licensing:
Contractor's
Licenses 27
675.00
484
12,100.00
24,942.85
472 11,800.00
Total 157 2,617,408.00 26,472.05 11508 26,224,260.00 239,228.61 11323 20,898,764.00 219,688.10
NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac, and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee, and
valuation amounts.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November 29, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: December Planning Commission
DISCUSSION
The December Planning Commission's regularly scheduled meeting
would have fallen on Tuesday evening, December 24th. Because this
date is Christmas Eve, the Planning Commission considered
rescheduling their December meeting date during their November 26th
meeting. There are no pending applications, and I do not expect
any applications prior to the December deadlines.
For these reasons, the Planning Commission has canceled their
December meeting, as has been done in past years. Should any
urgent Planning cases arise that simply cannot wait until the
January meeting, the City has the ability to call a Special
Meeting.
ACTION REOUIRED
None. This item is for your information only.
KLB:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November 29, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Clarification of Planning Commission Minutes of
October 22, 1991 - Northeast Corner of Dodd Road
and Marie Avenue
INTRODUCTION
At the City Council meeting on November 5, 1991, the City
Council requested a clarification from staff and the Planning
Commission on the motion and recommendation regarding a vacant lot
on Marie Avenue and Dodd Road (see attached minutes).
DISCUSSION
The Planning Commission discussed the corner at their November
meeting and there was a consensus of the members present that they
would like to see the City acquire the corner to maintain it as
open space. Specifically, they would like to have it remain wild
and natural as it now exists.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends that the City acquire title
to the land located in the northeast corner of Dodd Road and Marie
Avenue for purposes of maintaining the land in its current
configuration as wild and open.
ACTION REOUIRED
Discuss the Planning Commission's desire and determine whether
or not to implement their recommendation.
KLB:kkb
October 22, 1991
Page 5
related to flag lots and the City should start setting
standards regarding access, setbacks, preservations of
trees, etc.
Chair Dwyer stated that he felt the question was one of
the comfort level of Oe Planning Commission in allowing
this development and its affect on the surrounding
property. Chair Dwyer stated that most concerns have
been addressed and this development won't affect the
development of the surrounding property.
In response to a question from Commissioner Friel, Mr.
Knaeble stated that they anticipate construction starting
in the Spring.
Commissioner Friel moved to recommend that the City
Council grant the Wetlands Permit and to approve the
preliminary plat conditioned upon Outlot A being combined
with the property to the south.
Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
AYES: 5
\ NAYS: 0
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Krebsbach moved to recommend that the City
Council consider purchasing the vacant lot on the corner
of Marie Avenue and Dodd Road to prevent future
development and to provide access off of Marie Avenue.
Commissioner Friel seconded the motion.
COMAIS'StUrfdr-KfUrigEga moved to recommend that the City
Council request the State of Minnesota to replace the
trees on the southeast corner of Marie Avenue and Dodd
Road with trees of like value.
Commissioner Friel seconded the motion.
Public Works Director Danielson stated that the State did
submit plans for the drainage work they would be
correcting on the corner of Marie Avenue and Dodd Road.
He stated that the State did not indicate the amount of
trees they would be removing.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November 29, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Plat Correction
DISCUSSION
Dr. Tom Koepke is trying to clear up a title,problem with his
animal hospital located at the southeast corner of the intersection
of Dodd Road and Freeway Road. This corner should have been
platted as an "exception" within the "Jefferson Heights" plat back
in 1949.
In order to correct the plat and add the Doctor's property as
an exception, approve the attached correction to the plat.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that the City approve the correction as requested.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council desires to implement the recommendation, they
should pass a motion authorizing the City Clerk to execute the
Certificate of Correction to the plat.
JED:kkb
JOHN J. TODD
ATTORNEY AT LAW
SUITE 101
1549 LIVINGSTON AVENUE
WEST ST. PAUL, MN 55118
(612) 451-6798
FAX (612) 451-1921
November 19, 1991
Mr. James Danielson
City of Mendota Heights
Mendota Heights City Hall
1101 Victoria Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Re: Application of Thomas Koepke
Dear Mr. Danielson:
I am enclosing herewith an original and copy of Land Surveyors
Certificate of Correction to Plat. I presently represent Dr.
Thomas Koepke, the applicant for registration of title presently
pending in Dakota County, Minnesota. The examiner's report
submitted showed that the original plat contained an error in
description. Under the statute I have obtained certification from
Delmar H. Schwanz indicating the correction that should be made.
I have forwarded a copy of this document to Mr. Gary H. Stevenson,
Dakota County Surveyor. Under the procedures that must be
followed, the Mendota Heights City Council must first approve the
correction and then it will be approved by the County Surveyor and
allowed to be refiled.
I request that this matter be placed on the agenda of the Mendota
Heights City Council for approval. Thank you for your cooperation.
Very truly yours,
Joi' J. ' odd
A orney at Law
JJT/jm
CO RIZ eCTI1 'TO ?(J
1' -Tercripe..A tiA itrusLert "
gal •
LAND SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION TO PLAT
lame of Plat: JEFFERSON HEIGHTS
want to the provisions of Chapter 505.175 Laws of_Minnesota, 1957, Delmar H. Schwanz, the
:signed a Registered Land Surveyor in and for the State of Minnesota, declares as follows:
1. That the plat of JEFFERSON HEIGHTS dated April 11, 1949 and filed for record April 13,
949 in the office of the County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota, in Book "K" of Plats,
age 44, was prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor who is not now available for the following
easons: Deceased.
2. That said plat contains errors, ommissions, or defects in the following particulars,
An exception description was onunitted from the dedication portion of the plat.
3. That said plat is hereby corrected in the following particulars to wit: That said
adication description should also except the following described tract of land:.
Commencing at a point which is 9].0 feet East and 330 feet North of the
Southwest corner of the NW* .of Section 25, Township 28, Range 23; thence
North 34 degrees East 362.5 feet; thence North 52 degrees West 226 feet
to the Easterly line of Dodd Road; thence Southwesterly along the Easterly
line of said Dodd Road to a point: which is due West of the point of beginning;
thence East to the point of beginning.
ated: October 28, 1991
Registered Land Surveyor
No. 8625
State of Minnesota
le above Certificate of Correction to the plat of JEFFERSON HEIGHTS has been approved by
ity of Mendota Heights at a regular meeting of the city council of Mendota Heights,
i. .sota, held on the day of , 199
City Clerk
his Certificate of Correction has been checked and approved this day of
99
By:
Gary H. Stevenson
Dakota County Surveyor
LAND SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION TO PLAT
Name of Plat: JEFFERSON HEIGHTS
Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 505.175 Laws of Minnesota, 1957, Delmar H. Schwanz, the
undersigned a Registered Land Surveyor in and for the State of Minnesota, declares as follows:
1. That the plat of JEFFERSON HEIGHTS dated April 11, 1949 and filed for record April 13,
1949 in the office of the County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota, in Book "K" of Plats,
page 44, was prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor who is not now available for the following
reasons: Deceased.
2. That said plat contains errors, ommissions, or defects in the following particulars,
to wit: An exception description was ommit:ted from the dedication portion of the plat.
• 3. That said plat is hereby corrected in the following particulars to wit: That said
dedication description should also except the following described tract of land:
Commencing at a•point which is 910 feet East and 330 feet North of the
Southwest corner of the NW} .of Section 25, Township 28, Range 23; thence
North 34 degrees East 362.5 feet.; thence North 52 degrees West 226 feet
to the Easterly line of Dodd Road; thence Southwesterly along the Easterly
line of said Dodd Road to a point which is due West of the point of beginning;
thence East to the point of beginning.
dated: October 28, 1991
Registered Land Surveyor
No. 8625
State of Minnesota
Phe above Certificate of Correction to the plat of JEFFERSON HEIGHTS has been approved by
the City of Mendota Heights at a regular meeting of the city council of Mendota Heights,
Minnesota, held on the day of , 199
City Clerk
Phis Certificate of Correction has been checked and approved this day of
199
By:
Gary H. Stevenson
Dakota County Surveyor
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November 29, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: MnDOT Land Acquisition for Mendota Interchange Project
DISCUSSION
The MnDOT is currently working on finalizing their land
acquisition for the Mendota Interchange project. Mendota Heights
currently owns or will own two parcels of land that MnDOT needs to
acquire an easement on fee ownership (see attached drawings):
Parcel No. 207
Parcel 207 is located at the intersection of Acacia Boulevard
and Trunk Highway 55. MnDOT needs to acquire fee ownership of a
portion of this parcel in order to construct a frontage road to
serve the dog kennel and one private residence. This frontage road
will then be turned back to the City after the project is
completed.
MnDOT offers to purchase this land for $0.85/square foot or
$20,000. This offer compares very favorably with what the City
paid for the property.
Parcel No. 271A
Parcel 271A is located west of Trunk Highway 55 and south of
Acacia Boulevard. MnDOT needs to acquire a temporary easement on
this property for slope purposes. This easement will expire on
June 30, 1994.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that the City accept the State's offer on both the
above described parcels.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council desires to implement the recommendation, they
should pass a motion accepting the offers and authorizing the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute the required documents consummating the
sale.
JED:kkb
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155
612-296-3241
City of Mendota Heights
Office of the Mayor
750 So. Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120
In reply refer to: 7300
S.P. 1909 (55=116-23) *97-290
County Dakota
Parcel 207 - City of Mendota
Property Address: T.H. #55 and Acacia Blvd.
The State of Minnesota through the Department of Transportation is acquiring part of your
property for the improvement of Trunk Highways 13 and 55. The individual delivering this
letter is a Real Estate Specialist representing the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
This individual will explain the procedures involved in the acquisition process.
The monetary damage to your property due to this acquisition is $20,000.00, this being the
amount of the State's certified offer. This amount is based on appraisals by qualified real
estate appraisers. The monetary damage is for real estate acquired. Based on these
appraisals, it has been determined there is no loss in value to the remaining property.
Please be advised that lawful owners and/or occupants of the property on the date of this
offer may be entitled to relocation assistance and payments in accordance with Federal and
State laws.
It is important you read the information provided in the purchase packet. It will help you to
understand your rights during the acquisition process and assist you in making sound
decisions.
An Equal Opporruniro Employer
Page 2
As the acquisition of your property proceeds, you will undoubtedly have additional questions.
Please direct them to the Mn/DOT representative who submitted this offer.
e
R. J. Dinneen, Director
Office of Right of Way and Surveys
Package Contents:
"Guide for Property Owners" Booklet
Legal Description describing acquisition
Offer to Sell and Memorandum of Conditions (reference copy)
Conveyance Instrument (reference copy if applicable)
"Relocation Assistance" Booklet (if applicable)
Appraisal Reimbursement Claim Form
R3386E.R1
S.P. 1909(55=116-23) COUNTY DAKOTA PARCEL NO. 207
OWNER CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Scale 1' = 100 ft.
Entire Tract 144,914 sf
New TH R/W 24,254 sf
Balance 120,660 sf
1
1.
1
it
4
0
ACACIA BLVD.
......2111111111111611111111111111111111111
BLOCK 2
4
Lovout sketch by
A. RIDELL
Dote( 08/27/91
r
Parcel No. 207
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155
Date: 612-296-3241
Arthur T. and Diana L Mulvihill
1154 Orchard Place
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
In reply refer to: 7300
S.P. 1909 (55 =116-23) *97-290
County Dakota
Parcel 271A - Arthur T. Mulvihill
Property Address: 2183 Hwy. 55
Glen J. and Jean Mulvihill
Marcella and Charles Schweick
William J. and Mary Mulvihill
Rose Mary and Gerald Schmidt
Mary E. and Walter Milewski
The State of Minnesota through the Department of Transportation is acquiring a
temporary easement on part of your property for the improvement of Trunk Highway
No. 55. The individual delivering this letter is a Real Estate Specialist representing the
Minnesota Department of Transportation. This individual will explain the procedures
involved in the acquisition process.
The monetary damage to your property due to this temporary easement is $1,000.00,
this being the State's certified offer. This amount is based on appraisals by qualified
real estate appraisers. The monetary damage to your property is considered to be a
loss in value to your property.
Please be advised that lawful owners and/or occupants of the property on the date of
this offer may be entitled to relocation assistance and payments in accordance with
Federal and State laws.
• It is important you read the information provided in the purchase packet. It will help
you to understand your rights during the acquisition process and assist you in making
sound decisions.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Page 2
As the acquisition of your property proceeds, you will undoubtedly have additional
questions. Please direct them to the Mn/DOT representative who submitted this offer.
Sincerely,
0
R. J. Dinneen, Director
Office of Right of Way and Surveys
Package Contents:
"Guide for Property Owners" Booklet
Legal Description describing acquisition
Conveyance Instrument (reference copy if applicable)
"Relocation Assistance"' Booklet (if applicable)
Appraisal Reimbursement Claim Form
R809F.r1
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November 27, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Delinquent Sewer Bills
INTRODUCTION:
Certification of delinquent sewer accounts must be made
to the County by December 15th to become collectible in
1992. Council must therefore adopt a certification
resolution.
INFORMATION:
There are currently 68 delinquent sewer accounts,
including one commercial account, which should be certified
to the County if they remain unpaid by Monday evening. The
total outstanding balance at this time is $11,596.68.
Notices were sent to all delinquent customers on November 1,
and payments continue to trickle in. We anticipate that
several more will be received prior to certification.
DISCUSSION:
The letter sent to the property owners notified them
that if the delinquency was not paid by December 1, 1991 it
would be certified to the County and that a $25.00 charge
plus 7% interest would be added to the delinquency amount.
RECOMMENDATION:
I recommend that Council adopt the Delinquent Sewer
Resolution and direct staff to certify the fee to the County
Auditor for Collection in 1992.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should
adopt Resolution No. 91- , "RESOLUTION CERTIFYING
DELINQUENT SANITARY SEWER RENTAL CHARGES TO THE DAKOTA
COUNTY AUDITOR FOR COLLECTION WITH REAL ESTATE TAXES; and
direct certification to the County Auditor.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT SANITARY SEWER RENTAL
CHARGES TO THE DAKOTA COUNTY AUDITOR FOR COLLECTION
WITH REAL ESTATE TAXES
WHEREAS, under the provisions of this Ordinance No. 803
adopted by the City Council of Mendota Heights on August 6,
1974, it is provided that if sewer rental charges due the City
for the use of the City's sanitary sewer system are not paid
within thirty (30) days after the mailing of a statement
thereof, the same shall be collected and the collection
thereof enforced in the same manner in all respects as county
and state real estate taxes subject to like penalty, costs and
interest charges, and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has advised the City Council that
the total sewer rental charges due the City as of December 1,
1991, for sanitary sewer service furnished the properties
hereinafter described situated within the City has not been
paid and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has further advised the City
Council that a written statement for said sewer rental charges
due the City as of December 1, 1991, has been sent to the last
known owner of said properties and that more than thirty (30)
days have elapsed since the mailing of said statement, and
WHEREAS, said properties are all situated in the City of
Mendota Heights, in Dakota County, Minnesota and the legal
description of said properties, the name and address of the
last known owner thereof, and the total amount of sanitary
sewer rental charges due for each of said parcels through
December 1, 1991, are more particularly described as follows:
NAME AND ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TOTAL:
AMOUNT:
Judi Hanson
522 West Annapolis
Bernard Abramson
688 Arcadia Drive
Carl Lopez
610 Callahan Place
27-57500-030-01
27-37600-040-05
27-84300-350-00
$118.80
$235.40
$195.38
Brian Paulson
933 Chippewa Ave. 27-57500-020-03
T. Uribe
969 Chippewa Ave. 27-31300-150-02
Margaret Regan
992 Chippewa Ave. 27-47700-110-01
L. Bye
1052 Chippewa Ave. 27-49200-120-02
Roy Koch
1099 Chippewa Ave. 27-42100-170-08
Resident
1930 Coventry Court 27-71275-050-02
Will Gavin
1956 Crown Point Dr. 27-18600-190-01
Jack Derdoski
995 Diego Lane 27-44400-010-00
Robert Alvarez
1167 Dodd Road 27-42100-100-08
Robert Emery
1183 Dodd Road 27-03800-020-13
Carl Seivers
956 Douglas Road 27-76400-071-02
Bevan Marvy
970 Douglas Road 27-76400-050-02
K.R. Pew
1050 Esther Lane 27-42100-040-01
George Mikrut
1823 Faro Lane 27-44950-050-02
Neil Baker
680 South Freeway Road 27-38600-070-04
J. Isaac
662 Fourth Ave. 27-69701-023-04
L. Mrozinski
595 Highway 110 27-02500-024-04
Allen Shade
649 Highway 110 27-49250-010-02
$166.23
$263.80
$217.60
$ 78.00
$232.00
$180.20
$142.80
$ 71.90
$208.80
$147.20
$136.20
$131.80
$121.40
$136.20
$112.00
$136.20
$321.00
$247.80
Jerry Kilgus
1171 Victoria Curve
William Gove
755 Hilltop Road
Gael Forsman
610 Ivy Falls Ave.
Resident
1147 Ivy Hill Drive
James Vitelli
1163 Ivy Hill Drive
H. Slobof
1016 James Court
Bruce J. Davidson
1750 Lansford Lane
Donald Geist
1669 Lilac Lane
A. Ziifle
615 Maple Park Drive
Eugene Engelmann
1779 Overlook Lane
R. Holman
1791 Overlook Lane
Roy Henderson
1095 Overlook Road
Jack Gohl
924 Rae Court
J. Tousignant
978 Sibley Mem. Hwy.
S. Turner
1104 Sibley Mem. Hwy.
T. Sinsmore
1150 Sibley Mem. Hwy.
David Marruffo
537 Simard Street
Frank Miller
604 Spring Street
27-13700-010-01
27-71050-450-00
27-13350-027-00
27-17850-460-00
27-17850-160-00
27-76402-190-03
27-71100-030-02
27-76401-240-00
27-17850-590-00
27-32800-040-02
27-02300-013-53
27-32800-010-01
27-71275-180-02
27-03700-020-06
27-02300-021-50
27-13500-210-00
27-31300-062-01
27-42100-070-08
$174.51
$ 82.20
$123.00
$129.60
$ 66.80
$186.80
$377.30
$134.00
$112.00
$208.80
$ 60.40
$230.80
$186.80
$ 58.00
$ 84.00
$ 66.40
$118.10
$263.80
R. Powers
983 Stratford Road 27-72700-010-02
G. Cosgrove
649 Sunset Lane 27-54200-081-01
Michael Lallas
1750 Sutton Lane 27-70900-080-02
Steve Mesnik
1260 Sylvandale Road 27-37601-030-04
Paul Larson
717 Third Ave. 27-81300-045-00
John McMahon
1832 Twin Cricle Drive 27-44955-160-01
C. Lange
779 Upper Colonial Drive 27-17150-140-06
Mr. Lucioa
1888 Valley Curve 27-71050-430-00
Westson Cutter
1169 Veronica Lane 27-29200-010-01
R. McNamara
1021 Victoria Court 27-48600-010-01
Craig Byer
2219 Apache Street 27-27800-060-07
M. Frowick
766 Creek Ave. 27-27800-020-04
Arnold Hanzal
771 Creek Ave. 27-27800-030-01
Rick Long
2269 Field Stone Drive 27-18302-070-01
Walter Bonfe
2330 Kressin Ave. 27-64500-110-00
Olga Turner
2210 Lexington Ave. 27-16400-050-02
Leo Christianson
731 Mohican Lane 27-27800-300-22
Mrs. D. Anderson
751 Mohican Lane 27-27800-190-19
$202.20
$142.10
$114.00
$191.20
$159.30
$136.20
$217.60
$ 60.56
$ 97.60
$127.40
$ 58.00
$196.80
$200.00
$192.80
$266.00
$114.00
$112.00
$112.00
Charlene Steele
780 Mohican Lane 27-27800-080-20 $142.80
K. Saffole
2454 Park Lane 27-31800-010-03 $202.70
S. Siegfried
575 Pond View Drive 27-18301-150-01 $ 82.20
Michael Regan
2345 Pueblo Drive 27-27800-201-21 $162.60
Jerome Peterson
2066 Theresa Street 27-19100-220-03 $148.10
Resident
2166 Timmy Street 27-19150-090-00 $156.00
Mark Sterling
810 Wagon Wheel Trail 27-45300-020-00 $160.40_.
C. Thomas
832 Wagon Wheel Trail 27-45300-050-00 $279.40
Gerald Nelson
894 Wagon Wheel Trail 27-45300-150-00 $ 84.00
B. Randall
954 Wagon Wheel Trail 27-16400-160-00 $112.00
Tempco Manufacturing
2475 Highway 55 27-44800-102-00 $1,102.70
NOW THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows:
1) That the total of said sanitary sewer rental charges
set forth above is hereby adopted and confirmed as
the proper unpaid sanitary sewer rental charges due
for the above described properties through December
1, 1991, for each of said lots, pieces and parcels
of land respectively, and the current charge against
each such parcel of land shall be a lien concurrent
the general taxes upon such parcels and all thereof.
2) That the total amount of said sanitary sewer rental
charges shall be payable with general taxes for the
year 1992 collectible in 1992 (now designated by
Statute as real estate taxes payable in 1992).
3) That the City Clerk shall prepare and transmit to
the County Auditor a certified copy of this
resolution with the request that each of said
amounts shall be extended upon the proper tax lists
of the County to be thereafter collected in the
manner provided by the law.
4) That a $25.00 service charge will be added to each
delinquent sewer account in accordance with
Ordinance No. 157 amending Ordinance No. 803.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights
this 3rd day of December, 1991.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November 27, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dir
SUBJECT: Pine Creek Estates - Final Plat
DISCUSSION:
At their November 5, 1991 meeting Council approved the Pine
Creek Estates preliminary plat for Mr. Peter Knaeble subject to
two conditions:
1. That Outlot A be transferred to the landowner to the
south and be combined with that lot as one tax parcel.
2. That a scenic easement be prepared and recorded with
the plat preserving the terrain and vegetation sur-
rounding the two creeks.
The applicant has submitted his final plat and a proposed
conservancy (scenic) easement for City approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
I have reviewed the final plat and find it to be in conform-
ance with the approved preliminary plat. I also find the Con-
servancy Easement acceptable as prepared. I recommend that both
be approved as submitted.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the recommendation, they
should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 91- , RESOLUTION
APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR PINE CREEK ESTATES.
JED:dfw
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO.. 91 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR
PINE CREEK ESTATES
WHEREAS, a final plat for Pine Creek Estates, has been
submitted to the Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said final plat.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the final plat of Pine Creek Estates submitted at
this meeting is hereby approved.
2. That the appropriate City officials be and they are
hereby authorized to execute the final plat on behalf
of the City of Mendota Heights.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this
3rd day of December, 1991.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
CONSERVANCY EASEMENT
e,
THIS INDENTURE made this day of , 19, by and between Peter J.
Knaeble and James A. Taylor, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", and The City of Mendota
Heights, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter -referred to as "City".
WHEREAS, Grantor is the fee owner of the real property located in Dakota County, Minnesota,
legally described as:
Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 1, and Outlot A, PINE CREEK ESTATES, according to the recorded plat
thereof on file or of record in and for said Dakota County, Minnesota.
'b WHEREAS, Grantor has platted said property into a subdivision entitled PINE CREEK ESTATES, and
WHEREAS, Grantor and City wish to enter into an agreement which will grant to City a conservancy
easement for conservation and preservation of the terrain and vegetation, and to prohibit certain
acts destructive thereof, over a portion of the plat legally described as:
That part of Lot 1, Block 1, PINE CREEK ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof,
lying easterly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said lot distant 108.00 feet
westerly of the northeast corner of said lot to a point on the south line of said lot distant
108.00 feet westerly of the southeast corner of said lot,
and
that part of Lot 2, Block 1, PINE CREEK ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof,
Tying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said lot distant 91.00 feet
easterly of the northwest corner of said lot to a point on the south line of said lot distant
118.00 feet westerly of the southeast corner of said lot,
and
that part of Lot 3, Block 1, PINE CREEK ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof,
lying easterly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said lot distant 100.00 feet
westerly of the northeast corner of said lot to a point on the south line of said lot distant
273.00 feet westerly of the southeast corner of said lot,
and
that part of Outlot A, PINE CREEK ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying
westerly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said outlot distant 23.00 feet
easterly of the northwest corner of said outlot to a point on the south line of said outlot
distant 4.00 feet easterly of the southwest corner of said outlot.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises contained herein, it is agreed by the parties as
follows:
1. Grantor hereby grants, bargains, sells, and conveys to City and its successors and assigns
an easement in, under, on and over the` easement"(hereinafter referred to as the
"CONSERVANCY EASEMENT"), and City reby accepts the Conservancy Easement.
--4...-k
1.
2. The Conservancy Easement is granted and accepted subject to the following terms and
conditions:
A. The Easement Area shall be preserved predominantly in its natural condition.
No trees, shrubs, or other vegetation shall be removed from the Easement Area without
the prior written consent of City.
B. No building, road, sign, billboard, utility or other man-made structure shall be placed
in the Easement Area without the prior written consent of City. Construction of the
driveway, utilities, and culvert per the approved Preliminary Plat for Pine Creek Estates
(dated 10/31/91) is allowed within the Easement Area.
C. No trash, waste or other offensive material, solid or landfill shall be placed upon or
within the Easement Area without the prior written consent of City.
D. No change in the general topography of the Easement Area landscape, including but
not limited to excavation, dredging, movement or removal of soil shall be made without the
prior written consent of City.
E. The duration of the Conservation Easement is perpetual.
r1/410 -kke.
3. This agreement shal$bind and i+ e' the benefit of the parties, their successors
and assigns.
4. Nothing contained herein shall impair any right of City now held or hereafter acquired to
construct or maintain public utilities within or upon the Conservation Area.
cax
2.
Peter J. Knaeble and James A. Taylor have caused this indenture to be executed on the day and
year first above written.
PETER J. KNAEBLE and JAMES A. TAYLOR, Grantor
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
BY
Mayor
By
Manager.
L.)".420kielic."-c)
u.A-A-Q-0-162
State of Minnesota, County of
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
19 , by Peter J. Knaeble and James A. Taylor.
• Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My commission expires
State of Minnesota, County of
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
19_, by , the mayor and by
the manager of the City of Mendota Heights, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the
corporation.
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
Peter J. Knaeble
6001 Glenwood Ave.
Mpls., MN 55422
3.
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My commission expires
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
December 3, 1991
Excavating License
Lindquist & Leaf
General Contractors Licenses
Belkholm Brothers Builders
Classic Construction, Inc.
E & H Earthmovers, Inc.
Krabbenhoft, C.L.
Mell, Marlin -Construction
Heating & Air Conditioning License
Efficient Air Control, Htg. & A/C
•
December 2, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Council
CLAIMS LIST SUMMARY:
Total.ClAims
$ 161,733
Significant Claims
Board of Water watte connections 6,209
LMCIT Insurance 76,289
Med Center Health insurance 8,862
MWCC sewer charge 36,049
Unusual Claims
Mulvihill (manual) land purchase . 53,545
Anderson, Earl F Assoc park equipment 3,180
Dept 10-Adal Dept 50 -Roads- - ----- --
c9 Nov 1991 12/3/91 Claims List .15-Engr 60 -Utilities
Fri 2:28 PM City of Mendota Heiohts 20 -Police 70 -Parks
1 30 -Fire 80 -Planning
1 Ternp Check Nurnber 1 40- CEO 85 -Recycling
--90=Animal Control
ISI
J Ternp.
t Check
f- ---Number--Vendor- Narne- - ---- ------------- Account -Code -
16'
I8
1c1
,0
t1
112
r.1
,a!
1i
15;
.17
r9'
20
—-3-AT&T
'22'
23! 3 AT&T
:24'
•2r,
1 A T & T
T
1 A T & T
3
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber
Ternp-Check-Nurnber---------- 2
01-4210-110-10
--01-4210-020-20
05-4210-105-15
1
Comments
ld calls
ld -calls-
ld calls
2 Earl F Anderson & Assoc 09-4460-000-00
Re 89-6D
Pape 1
Amount
18. 16
16 -05
1.79
-36.00
6
13
14 {�
15 `!
16
2
Totals Terno Check Nurnber
Ternp Check Nurnber
3 AT&T
---3-AT&T
12
Totals -Temp -Check Nurnber-------------3-------------
'28
2
014210=020-20
01-4210-050-50
01-4210-070-70
15-4210-060-60-
Dec svc
Dec svc
Dec svc
Dec svc
3.180.30
3. 180.30
17
ie
• 20
57-30
10.53
10.52
10.53
36. 88
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1)
26'
23
30
132
34'
35: t
37,
36:•
!3(i imp 1..E1 K IVUIIIDer '; 4u
'-----_
41
—_.
32 4 Accurate Ammunition 01-4490-020-20 solys 165.00 42
33 43
4 1€»5.-00 44
34 45
3s Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 4 46
47
36 op -Ghee -Si -Number -5 ae
37. 49
38 50
s9 5 Albinson 05-4300-105-15 ^. storaoe solus - - 368.04 51
52
ao 5 368.04 54
243 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 5 55
56
44, Ternp Check Nurnber 6 58
59
45 60
6-Amer-icl-n-Nat i-onal--Bank
46 13-4226 000-00 fees - 50.-00 61
471 6 American National Bank 08-4226-000-00 fees 272.30 52
-- 63
1-2 64
--322.30
49 65
Totals Temp Check Nurnber 6 - 66
50
" 67
51Temp-Cheek-Nurnber 7 se
52 69
63 70
54 7 Berkley Risk Svcs 05-4250-105-15 bond renewal 1.346.00 71
n
5573
X57 79
1 )
0
0
29 Nov 1991 Claims List Pane 2
Fri 2:28 PM City of Mendota Heinhts
Temp Check. Number 7
7
/, remp'
137 Check
—Number -Vendor -Name
7 Berkley Risk Svcs 15-4250-060-60
1-=
"
• -oomments-
uona renewal
_ _
14
Totals remo Check Number 7
Temp Check Number 8
2
3
4
,
171
"
-aezkhozm-Div 01~3140 refunu'zicense'ree
8
To*e4s-Temp-Cheek-Number 8
Temp Check Number 9
20
22t
23
27
24,
s-Temn�:»ecx-wumuer
25
Temo Check Number
-10 Baertschi & Assoc.
• 9 Kevin Batchelder 01-4*15-110-10 exp reimu
9 Kevin Batchelder 01-44/5-085-85 evo reimu
9 -Kevin -Batchelder- -- 411-4400-440-10- exo reimb
29
30
o'
'32
33
34
35
36
1m
9
01-4402-020-20
10—
---'--''--__-_--_--_-
Totals Temp Check Number 10
n•
�
, -
22
2. '
s u• '
.40
14
renewal
52'wo
1,oya'wm 19
----'---'------'--------
114
115
25 00 116
117
25.00 C�
1211
19.25
20.10 )271
'--'
7.00
171
46.35
231
34)
361
37,
44210
44
45
�[}
w
ae
49
50
m
"
j34
�
=
57
�
�
6
m
62
63
64
CC rhill
11 Board of Water Commissioners svc conn 86-4
11-mea:rd-o svc_conn as=z
41
w
Temp Check Number 12
2.072'ms
4 136-0
8.65
43
44
45
46
,47
145
49
50
51
52
53
m
55
12 Brings & Morgan
36-4226-000-00 91 bond issue 1,4*8'50
09-4226-000-00 91 bond issue 1,448.50
24
Totals Temp Check Number 12
2,uyr'ww
Temp Check Number
13
s
13
Temp Check wymber' 14
13
Oot-svc 230 00
230.00
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
8
29 Nov 1991
Fri 2:28 PM
Temp Check Nurnber 14
j1!
i Ternp.
Check
7• —Number-Vendor-Name ------------------ -Account-Code------------------_--_.Cc.rnrnents--------'------ ----Amount
Claims List
City of Mendota Heiohts
Pape 3
5i 14 Chern l awn 08-4335-000-00 fall lawn svc
Gf
18 14
6I Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 14
9'
10
!1i1 Ternp Check Nurnber 15
121
'73 35 City -Motor -Supply--- -- -01-4380-490-50 ----- - - - parts
14,
s1 15
76' Totals -Temp -Check -Number 15
17f
i -r,! Terno Check Nurnber 16
'19;
:C
.'7
^<a
- • ---Ternp-Check--Nurnber- --
16 Canveras burns 01-4490-020-20
-1-6
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 16
17 Continental Safety Eq 01-4305-030-30
17
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber
17
773.00
6
773.00
-81.46
81.46
9
110.01
12
13
14
15 ` '
1G
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
solus 145.90
solys
145.90
n
25
26 -1
27
28
29'
30
31 •
84.18
34
25
36
84.18
36
+4C
4;1
az Ternp Check Nurnber 18 42
43
33 44
-8 -Copy 1Dupi-i-cat-cat-products 4.'i1
01 -4E05 -0E0-50 Nov-copi-es
34 1 45
----
35 6
36 18 4.41 4487
Total.. T-ernp-Number-Nurnber - 1-8
37 49
38 50
,„Terno Check Nurnber 19 51
39 52
53
41 19 Carrigan Electric 01-4211-420-50 rprs Hwy 55 & MH 110.36 54
-- 55
42 56
1-9 1-1..36
4, 57
44' Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 19 58
59
45 60
46 np-Check-Nmber 20 61
4_ 62
20 Custom Fire Apparatus 01-4330-460-30 rors 235.90 63
46.G4
49 65
20 235.90 66
So
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 20 - - 67
61 68
52
63 Temp Check Nurnber 21 70
71
54
24 County 04=4211-42-0=50 3rd f sig 457_38 73
-Dakota -Hwy -Dept -qt -r -c
55
74
7� r 21 457.38 - 75
7.9
0
29 Nov 1991 Claims List Rape 4
Fri 2:28 PM City of Mendota Heiohts
Ternr Check Nurnber 22
--1 Ternp.
Check
il, •----Nurnber-Vendor•-Narne - •---- ------------------• Account --Code------• --- -- -- - --- -- Comments--
-i
ornrnents--- - -_---•
'22 Dakota County Tech Inst 01-4400-030-30 FF 1 Trno 330.00
)7.
22
! Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 22
Ternp Check Nurnber 23
330.00
i'=------Jarnes-Dan-i-elson 05-4415-105-15-_-._._•__.- __._—___._Dec -allow 120.00
ai 23
-+- Tat -a s-temp-Check-Nurnber 23
'16i
` Ternp Check Nurnber 24
!tr.
2CI 24 Dennis Delmont 01-4415-020-20 Dec allow
.21 • _ - •
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 24
:3!
--Ternp--Cheek Nurnber------------25 ----
:9
'3G
25 Dis Corn of Minnesota. Inc 01-4330-460-30
25
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber
Ternp Check Nurnber 26
25
rors
120.00
120.00
114.97
114.97
11_
G,
!n.
qc
i2G1 .1
/pi
41
42'•
1 39- 43
f..,-Fi-el-dstcne-6abi-nentry I qa
-ie--- 01=4d -a1--020=20 Dec -Re -Garlock— 78....00
1.;7--- 45
35
136 26 78.00 47
t-heck-Nurnber 26 46
37Tr-a3-s-Temp
49
36 rn
Tep Check Number " 27 - F 51
39 _ - 51
52
40 53
41 27 Fire Inst Assn 01-4402-030-30 solys 50.55 54
nr -- 55
27 50-55 55
»� Totals 'Ternp Check Nurnber 27 se
ids, Ternp-Cheek Nurnber-- 28 co
61
4 • 02
qs 28 First Interstate Bank Trustee 01-2071 Dec prem 196.76 63
64
28-F-i-28--Inter-state-Bank-Tr-Trustee--0.1=41x2= 20020-20 Dec
- -prem- 69-46
55
9 28 First Interstate Bank Trustee 01-4132-050-50 Dec prern 21.08 65
50 prem First Interstate Bank Trustee 01-4132-070-70 Dec pre25.57 '57
61I ., --- - 68
52I 112 312.87 69
sal! Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 28 71
72
55
s6� - Ternp Check Nurnber - 29 ,� 774
I_ - 75
Ong, -i_.-_1 _.t..-. nom_.: _-J-_�;iv QJ �r �.���' �n:�dQl'�Qr�J ct7.7-V.r�
7 4A mT29
0
0
i
1
29 Nov 1991
Fri 2:28 PM
Ternp Check Nurnber 29
Teruo.
; 3 1 Check
r--•-- Nurnber--Vendor- Narne
5
-29e Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 29
'9
;10,- Temp -Check---Nurnber --- -
111
12 30 Goodyear Cc.rnrnl Tire 01-4305-030-30
Claims List
City of Mendota Heights
Account Code-- - -- -
IS 3.
41 30
16i
Totals Temp Check Nurnber 30
Rage 5 � .
-- ----- Cornrnerlts - ---- - ---------Arncunt
•
2
3
4
48 00 --•-
tires 1.153.07
6 --�
7
8
9
10 n
S7 `
12
13
14 -�
151
16
1. 153.07
17
18
19
20
'6
181
t1or---31 Jahnsc+n Weldino--- ----01-4330-490-50-------- ------- tors 85,00
21 31 85.00
----Totals-Temp-Check Number -- -
.2
Teruo Check Nurnber 31
Ternp Check Nurnber
32
•
32 Jaynes Kilburg 01-4400-030-30 reirnb exo Ch conf
27
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber
32
1
22
23
4
25
`•7
26
27
.28
20
31
32.
•3Y
57.83 34
35
—57 83 .16
37
38.
39'+
40
41
4
431'
44
45
46
47 "--
48
3c'
--- -Ternp-Check-•Nurnber -- 33 -••-
32
33 33 Kar Products 01-4305-030-30 solys 43.10
34 33 -Kar -Products 01 4305 050-50 splys 13.1-0
35 33 Kar Products 01-4305-070-70 solys 43.10
36 33 Kar Products 01-4305-020-20 splys 43.10
�
37 3a-Kam-Prcduet-s —15-4305=060=60 sad -vs 43.-08
36 • ' ' 165 - 215.48
39
40 Tota3srn
Teo-C-heck--Nurnber 33
azTeruo Check Nurnber 34
49
50
51
52
53
45.
56
43
44
45'
46
47
46
49
50
34 Kat Keys
34
01-4305-030-30
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 34
Ternp-Cheek-Nurnber 35
solys
59.50
59,-50
57
59
60
61
62
63
64
35 Knox Commercial Credit 01-4305-070-70` solys 183.91
61 "tee-x-Gemrnerc -a-1-Credit —01-4305=050 50• splys-tart-exempt • 1-a-98
52
63
54
55
56
`57
70 197.89
Tot -R s---erno-Check-Narnber a5
Ternp Check Nurnber `
36
55
66
67
68
69
70
72
74
75
7.9
29 Nov 1991
Fri 228 PM
Temp Check Nurnber 36
h7
21 Ternp.
Check
1---Number-Vendor-Name-
36 Knutson Rubbish Service 08-4335-000-00
Claims List Pape 6
City of Mendota HeiDhts
------Account-Code -Comments -
F .
36
al
I.: Totals Temp Check Nurnber 36
1--I•
'10
Temp Check Nurnber 37
4---- --37-T-Hornas-Knuth---___________________72_,-441-5,635=00_______________ ..mi_reimb 25 30
37 Thomas Knuth 70-4415-871-00 mi reimb 20.90
I.,
37 Thomas Knuth 66-4415-870-00 mi reimb 53.07
l
37 -Mamas -Knuth-
6
37 Thomas Knuth -1---44t5=830=00
sii-reimb_
mi reimb 20 90
05-4415-105-15
16.78
,171
37 Thomas Knuth 05-4415-105-15 Dec allow 10.00
!Im
114i
12-01 222
12d Totals Temp Check Nurnber 37
L'
F-21 Temp Check Nurnber 38
IT'
1-' --
Nov svc
L
-
14 ,
60.06 i671
60.06
38
----- -Tot a 1 s -Temp -Check-Number ---
-14 Temp Check Number 39
Dec dues
146.95
250.00
250.00
;31
22.
23
2Z
CC,
3C
:9
39 League of MN Cities 01-2074 Dec °rem 544.84
32 42
39 League of MN Cities 01-4131-020-20 Dec prem 813.27 43
23
------- 44
34 45
78 1,358.11 6
35
Totals Ternp Check Number 39 47
36 46
37
TempNurnber, 'Check 40 , .
36 50
.„ 49
. , .
, ,
..e , . " 51
•
, ,
n - . .
978-00- 52
—1-5=42 ,50=e6a=60 mult-i-per,11-cover.age
40 53
41 40 LMCIT 01-4250-110-10 2 mos 92 iris 9,078.00 54
40 LMCIT 05-4250-105-15 2 mos 92 ins 391.00 55
42
-MCIT 2 mos 146-00 55
-15=4250=-060-Z0 -S1 -ins
43, 57
40 LMCIT01-1215 10 os 92 ins 65,696.00 58
. - m
45
-24 - 00' 7-6 289 00 60
46 61
Totals Temp Check Nurnber 40 62
47
63
46
64
Temp
-Cheek -Number -4149 . 65
50 66
41 La Hass Mfg & Sales 01-4330-490-70 Dart - . 96.60 67
.
51 ',,
- 58--
52 69
41 96.60 70
63
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 41 71
64
72
65 . .
'Ternp CheciONIumber 42 - . 73
,
' 74
66
75 . .
LQ-----11+2-14--T-11-erna,- L .711.14;44 „ M1-441-1.04.4 . -M Dt.tra—..m3ar., 174_00 7.9
'
. ' __ _- ' -- _ '
29 Nov 1991 Claims List
| Fri 2,28 PM
City of Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 42
',| Temp.
',/ Check
r---Number-Vendor-Name- --- - -'- Account -Code comments
,.
,:
__ -- - - '
" Totals Temp Check Number 42
9:
`q
�`.
-17!
remp-Check-Number-------'4o
43 Lawson Products
VI
14.
43
Totals Temp Check Number
01-4305-070-70
Page 7
Amount
175 00
2
3
4
"
9
```fl
solys
19.75
13
1415 e•-•,:
16
43
19.75
17
a
,u
20
i16
Temp Check Number 44
L-i-bertv-Press-Inc 01 4305-030-30 --- ----199m-report
44
Totals -Temp Check Number 44
22;
�
T--- Check Number 45
_ -' '_
45 Marks Auto Upholstery
,, Totals Temp Check Number
-:-1-----Temp-Check Number '- 46
------.^-
01-4330-490-70
45
rprs
_370,-00
21
22
23
24
370.00
175.00
175 00
'Th
25
26
27
n °
- _ 46 m n Associates 01-4305-050-50 �ew 43
4434
46-M � m -sp��s oy.ew
4599 *6 m n Associates 15-4305-060-60solys os'1s 49
= --- 47
1-38 1r'5a ""
49
m �Totals Temp Check Number 46 . . � soi38 � - � m130 , ., ,
�
r�m �r
� -_-_ �_-- 53
54L
47 Mac Connection258.00
= 01-4330-440-20 rprs ""
43 47 258 .00 -
= ' �
Totals Temp Check Number 47 _ n
= • 60
.46 Temp Check Number 48 61
n
4=
48-meu 01-2074
Dec -prem 1,87-7-10999
48 Med Centers H P 01-4131-110-10 Dec prem . 1,244.80 99904u Med Centers H P 01-4131-0e0-20 Dec prem 2,750'35 � m
"` --+o-Med-oen�ers-H p�- � ��a�-w*w-�w Dee �mo�m» ""
-prem
-01m ""
48 Med Centers H P 01-4131-050-50 Dec prem 833.35
"" 48 Med centers H P 01-4131-070-70 Dec orem 205'75 71
"^ ' cd Centers -H-11 05~4131 1-05~15 Deo-nrem ' c. 6
n
n, �/ ' ' ' - �� � � ' `°
. ..- � � � _ . � � � .� ,n
(l
29 Nov 1991
Fri 2:28 PM
Claims List page 8
City of Mendota Heights
1 Ternp Check Number 48
2 Temp.
Check
---Number -Vendor-Narne-------- --- - - - •- Account- Code •----- - - -- - - -• Comments
Q 48 Med Centers H P
'7r----f►B-Med-Centers-H p
08-4110-000-00
-15-4131-060-S0— .-_ - -- .-._---- Dec .prern -
Dec prem 122.40
al 432
;1 61
- TT-otals-erno-Check---Nunber -----• ------48
11'
Temp Check Number 49
141
11.;
49 Mendota Heights Landscape 01-4500-050-50
19
1r' Totals Temp Check Number 49
17!
I1E1
11--, -- TernpCheck-Number-- ---_ 50--
:1
251
21; 50 Metro Waste Control 15-4449-060-60
i-- .----- —•-50 -Metro-Waste-Control--------- -- 17-3575 -- •-- •- ----
.1 100
-1 --Totals-Temp-Check-Number- - -50-- ---- ----
Ternp Check Number 51
51 Midwest Business products
51 Midwest Business products
:----------54-Midwest-Business Products
01-4300-110-10
01-4300-040-40
- 05-4300=105-15..
_455 90
8,862.05
tree svc 150.00
Dec svc
Dec svc -
spivs
splvs
sows
._150.00
38. 845. 08
s1
i2
11 0 41,1
FGi
27
36.049. 00 :31
----- --_..—_--------- �;I
24 ,
-
294.80 - -
81.08
32I 51 Midwest Business products 15-4300-060-60 splvs 102.53 t2
i-_ 1 --- 43
lii'3 —2`0'1 23 43
_.544
135 Totals Ternp Check Number 51 45
46
36 47
mpCheck-Number50 48
37 . _ 49
66 52 Minneapolis Health Dept. 01-4305-020-20=c - - Oct lab tests -, 58.00 .. - . , 51
t 52
!46 53
I 52 58.00
Totals Temp Check Number 52 55
F158
Ternp Check Number 53
44
59
121----•---d�s-Mi-nn-Ce14-ul-ar•-Tele-Co---------01--4200=-6-10-20 Nov---svc 5 07 60
47 53 Minn Cellular Tele Co 01-4200-610-30 Nov svc 11.75 62
46 53 Minn Cellular Tele Co 01-4200-610-10 Nov svc 5.74 63
C4
53--M-inn-Cellular—Tele Co 01-4200-610-20 Nov_svc
—10-30
49 53 Minn Cellular Tele Co 01-4200-610-30 Nov svc 6.82 65
1
50 • 66
� 51 --- .. - 67
65 40-2: 68
52 Totals Temp Check Number 53 �u
153
54 71
rn p -Check -Number '4 72
56
I56 ,-54-Minnesota Locks 08-4335-000-00 splys 21.50 75
75
7.
r)
0
( F
29 Nov 1991 Claims List
Fri 2:28 PM City of Mendota Heights
Teruo Check Number 54
Pape 9
Ternp.
Check
--Number Vendor -Name
54
---Totals-Temp-Check- Nurnber - -•- - --- - •-54 -
;81
Account -Code------------- -- ----Comments--
Temp
-- --.-_--•----- -Amount
Ternp Check Nurnber 55
1.
12'
01
14•
0 5:
55 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-2074
55 Mian Mutual Life Ins 01-4131-110-10
55-M3-nn-Mutual-L4-fe--Ins----.-01-41-31-020-20
55 Mian Mutual Life Ins 01-4131-070-70
55 Minn Mutual Life Ins 08-4110-000-00
o5-M±i-nn-Mutual-E4fe-Igns—
.16
---
7 330
,s
Totals-Temp-CheckNumber
. t
20'
L7. Temp Check Number 56
-'-- --56-Minnesota-Benefit-Assn ------ --- 01-4131-070 70
56 Minnesota Benefit Assr, 15-4131-060-60
56 Minnesota Benefit Assn
56 Minnesota Benefit Assn
56-Minnesota-Benefit-Assr,
56 Minnesota Benefit Assn
01-2074
01-4131-110-10
05-4131-105-15
01-4131-020-20
56 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-4131-050-50
21.50
2.')
3
5
7
8
9
;°c)
Dec prern 188.22
Dec prem 1.70
Dec--prern 3-40
Dec prern 3.40
Dec prern 1.70
11-1-29 -Pavro l3 535,-00
713.42
Dec prern
Dec prern
Dec prern
Dec orern
Dec prem
Dec - orern
Dec prern
192.79
251.88
---37778
691.29
18.68cr
348.98 -'
112.40 a8
39 ""j
-------- 1.-956. 44
13
1
15 4
16
17
18
19
20;
21
22
23
24
25
26r�
n
_78
30 -�
_a
:4
X33 43
44
i3» Temp-Eheck-Number 57
45
46
35
36 57 Minnesota Toro Inc 01-4330-490-70 Darts 248.71 47
48
a 49
57 248.71 50
39 ._Totals-Ternp Check Number 57 - a - 51
- 52
40 53
41 Temp Check Number 58 54
55
4
58-Morten7-hokc.I 01 4421-050 50 t 675. 74
-safe salt 5557
4,4
44 58 Morton Thokol 01-4421-050-50 safe t salt 676.31 58
--- 59
45 .. 1,-352,05
46 11G �o
47 Totals Temp Check Number 58 62
63
t0 64
Temp-Gheek-Number-- 59
a9 65
55
so- 59 Nardini Fire Eq 01-4335-315-30 re charge 28.00 67
51 53-Nardrri=�z:-rt-Y8-4335--000-00 • 34 _ 66
E2 meq annl34.-50-nso 69
53 --- 70
Sa 118 62.50 71
Totals Ternp-Gheek-Nurnber 53 3
56
SG74
I7 Ternp "Check Number 60 - 75
0
C
29 Nov 1991 Claims List pace 10
Fri 2:28 PM City of Mendota Heiohts
Teruo Check Number 60
'2 1 Teruo.
11,3 Check
'-4---Nurnber--Vendor-Name- - -- Account -Code- -Comments -
!4:
6 60 North Star Chapter ICBO 01-4400-040-40 12/6 roto 15.00
IF.
' e ' 60
e
iQ
--Amount -------•-••--• - -
Totals Temp Check Nurnber 60
'10 Teruo Check Nurnber 61
iv
h3j-----61-Ncmthwestern- Ag oreg at e---•------- 01 .4421-050-50
141 61 Northwestern Aooreoate 01-4421-050-50
�151 61 Northwestern Aggregate 01-4421-050-50
1 ,
1171
1781
183
Totals Temp Check Nurnber 61
11uy
20 Temp Check Nurnber 62
I21
2212.31
62
Tot.a-ls Temp -Check Nurnber- •------- 62
-01-4305-070-70 --
;2-
Temp Check Nurnber 63
e. 63 Northern State Gower
19,
37 -
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber
01-4211-300-50
63
ice rock
ice rock
ice rock
solvs
Nov svc
15.00
561 56
370.04
188. 16
�6
1'
9 •
9!
r3
14
0
76j
17
16i,(••�
7�t
1.119.76 211
24j
--1251
27;
_ __.___.__._262.32
262.32
382. 35
. _. _ 382.35
3
231
34'•1
- f
33
T-ernp--Gheek-Number
Nov svc
Nov svc
41
44
34
35
36
-----64
64 Oakcrest Kennels
4 0akorest-Kennel-a
01-4221-800-90
0L -4225__800=9.O—
165.00
114 00
45
46
47
4H
3749
38 -
39
---
' 128 • , . „
T-otalc TempLCheck-Nurnber
64
279.00
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
40
41
42
Temp Check Nurnber 65
43
44
415
a�
48
� 65 Oxygen Service Co
--
sJ
08-4335-000-00
Oct act
thru
11/15
13.50
se
59
c0
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber
T-ernp-Ghec-k-Number 66
65
_.13.50
��
63
G4
49
6066
51
'66 P D R
_--
01-4402-020-20 '
- -
renewal
49.95
-
65
. 67
68
62
53
54
66
Totals Temp Check Nurnber
66
49.95
�o
71
72
55
56
'
Temp Check Nurnber 67
... Q >
,, ... TS.... -...i.
A. .
>
011—42ogL=1_iI11�1A
•
.- nlxia
-
. 7C, 7S -
., •
7734
.. 75
7
0
29 Nov 1991
Fri 2.28 PM
Claims List
City of Mendota Heiohts
Ternp Check Number 67
2 i Ternp.
Check
51
--Number -Vendor--Name - _- ---------- Account - Code-- ----- - - -
s 1 67-
17!
81 Totals Terno Check Number 67
• s'
----Temp-Check-Number---- Number ----68
1 G�
11
12I
3`
141
1151
68 Plaza Tire & Svc
--Comments
01-4330-440-20
68
Totals Ternp Check Number 68
Page 11
Amount
72 75
1 2
,
3
14
5
tires 2245 130.68
119
( 11O1 n
110,
i1:
1131
114
1151.)
116
130.68
117
118
.20
111 Ternp Check Number 69
119
2G
69 -Road -Rescue
69 Road Rescue,
69 Road Rescue
24!
:c
01-4610-020-20 ------_._ -.--•-------- - credit
12-4620-000-00 parts
01-4610-020-20 Darts
207
Totals Terno Check Number 69
Terno Check Number 70
_r. 70
t'3G 70
Totals Temp Check -Number
-70-
solys
-7.2-1 00er
967. 50
856. 07
1.102.57
21
22
23
24
125
;27
401.94
401.94
281
27
[31
1Z2
,33
.34
-6
37.
26.
36
G
41
32 42
Ternp Check Number 71 43
33 44
24
3s 71 S & T Office Products 01-4300-020-20 solys 120.78 46
-- 42
1=1/1-7S 4W
71
498
asTotals Ternp Check Number 71 - So
51
n 52
Ternp--Check-Number 7.2
4o sa
41 54
42 72 Schuster Eq Co 01-4330-490-50 Darts 34.17 55
56
a 72 - 34.17 58
as Totals Ternp Check Number 72 59
GO
46 61
42 Ternp Check Number 73 62
63
IF4u 64
73 G-G-Sharrow Co 1-5 4330 490 60 84-96
--part Gs
49
50 66
61 73 84.96 67
Tot 73 - ..
-a -l -s- emp-Ctneek-Number 69
62
53 n
Ternp Check Number 74 71
64 72
56 73
s6 74 Seven Comers Ace Hdwe- 01-4420-050-50 solys . 23.20 °74
•
GG --n
}
29 Nov 1991
Claims List
Fri 2:28 PM City of Mendota Heights
Ternp Check Nurnber 74
Ternp.
Check
----Number-Vendor-Name - - - - --
{51
1-
�7
Account -Code — -
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 74
Temp Check Nurnber 75
---75-L-E---Shaughnessy Jr-------- --- ----01-4220-132-10-- -- -
In1
75 L E Shaughnessy Jr 05-4220-132-15
I.1 75 L E Shauohnessv Jr 15-4220-132-60
7.5-L--E-Shaughnessy--Jr--.--------. _-03-4220-132=00--__--_-
75 L E Shaughnessy Jr 21-4220-132-00
14! 75 L E Shaughnessy Jr 14-4220-132-00
1151
1-1-;1---- 75 -L -E Shaughnessy-Jr-----------16-4220-432---00-------
-
haughnessy-Jr------------15-4220=132-00-------
17
11P 525
119.
11 Totals-Ternp-Check--Nurnber..------- __ _
'26
Ternp Check Nurnber 76
221
23,76 Southview Chev 01-4330-215-70
;a.
.5
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber
27
tE --Ternp- Check--Nurnber- - - - - 77
it
-26
130
77 Streichers
31
76
01-4410-020-20
- Comments
Rape 12 \-7)
1
2
- Amount
5
7
3
9
,1 ''l . YY
- Nov svc -- - - 1.520.70. -
Nov svc 154.80
Nov svc 247.60 ;:C)
-•-•- Nov svc -- -------_-139.20 115
Nov svc 185.70 18;—.)
Nov svc 1,276.70 19 •
-- - - ___Nov svc---_----- _-- _.__.-___ -- _344.30 20
.21
37869.00 22-)23
,24
solys
solys
69. 00
69. 00
92.75
25
201 ••
27111111
26'
.29
30
31
72
33
34'
25'
137
3e, )
29
/ / 'Ji_. /J I
az Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 77 43
33 44
34 Temp Check Nurnber 78 45
rn
3.6 46
36 47
'--Stem--1-i-ng-E-1-ee-ti=ic 01-4335=31.00=50— bulbs 2 20 48
--
37
-- - 49
3E, ^ 50
78 22.30 ', - • 51
-Nuber 78 52
Totas-T-erne--6hee4rn
o l-
53
as 54
Ternp Check Nurnber 79 55
43 79 Tripp Oil 16-4473-000-00 Re 1305 Kendon 150.00 5s
44
�
-- 59
as 7.9 150.00 - - CO
-
4� Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 79 62
E3
Ternp-Chec-{c-Nurnber- 80 64
aa98
65
{
50 66
80 U 8 West Communications 01-4210-110-10 Nov svc 294.37 67
57 .0 "--.J-S-West-Ccrnrnur+i-cat4ons 0.1=4210=020=20— Nov-svc 374.-81 - - - 68
52 80 U S West Communications 01-4210-040-40 Nov svc 53.92 70
53 80 U S West Communications 05-4210-105-15 Nov svc 160.88 71
64 80-U-S-West-CornrnunIcat-i-ans 15-4210=.060=60 Nov-svc 50_..56 72
65 73
155- 74
(k7 75
7
0
c -.i
•
29 Nov 1991
Fri 2,28 PM
Temo Check Number 80
—
Claims List
City of Mendota Heiohts
;`|
-/
Temp.
"| Check
,
�:'--wm"uer—venuor'wame--------- -------
'4,
"|
80 U a West Communications 01-4e10-030-30 Nov svc
om'y a West Communications -----m1-4a1m-w5w-5w--'--- 'wov svc
�--ew U a West Communications 01-4210-070-70 Nov svc
/"' 80 U a west communications 15-4210-060-60 Nov Svc
"
80-1.1.--S-wesa-oemmuni-caxions-------09-4e10-000-00 ---------- Nov svc
11 ---
11:aww
Tot -Number am
14
Temp Check Number 81
81 uniforms Unlimited 01-4410-020-20 solvs Delmont
4 81 Uniforms Unlimited w1-441w-wem-ew� spzvs
�
�
84_Un�orms-uniumi*eu -------w1-+41w~mum-am solvs-ariuoer
---
; a*o .
`� -wumber--------a ----
remn Check Number 82
;, 82 United Way St Paul 01-e070
'�
~!
Pape 13
Comments---'------ Amount
aa
Totals Temp Check Number 82
pa
--Temo*mecx-wumuer-------- 83
31
Dec contr
1.198.45
15
»�
07
^°.
—"`
53.91
/o1'ow
142-10123
��
297.39 *n
196.00
-496.00
152
'33.
441
41
'32 83 University or Minn01-4400-050-50Fall oonr Olund 105.00 143—=
= 4583 105.00
35
Totals Temp Check Number 83 47
w`
3750
Temn Check Number • 84 . . . =
33 � ' � ��
m ' az�*���on �� ' '°=,�� � � w�-�omm wmw-�m
' 11 �'' 52=
~�x*�
_—~ 53--54
=
84 11'00 • 55
ro6
-8457
43 57
°
Temp Check Number a� 53,
... ow
= °
85 Western Life Ins 01-4132-031-30 Dec prem 159'10
47
--
4063
05 159-4Z"^
=
Totals Temp Check Number 85 ""
"o 67
51 Temp-G,eex-Number 86
685269
53,"
54 86 R B Whitace & Co 01-+305-070-70 sozys e1'80 71
72
= � 73
aa56. ' . s�'aw . 74
� �Totals Temp'ohecx Number , ' 86 , . . ' . ..' . .� . - a
') (
/
29 Nov 1991 Claims List
Fri 2:28 PM City of Mendota Heights
Temp Check Nurnber 87
Terns.
3 Check
i a j---Nurnber-Vendor -Name - --- - -
s,
87 Winthrop & Weinstine 01-4220-120-80
PI 87
,i Totals Temp Check Nurnber 87
,fol Temp Check Number 88
12•
88 Zap -Mfg -Co ----__ _ 01,4305-050-50 -..__.__ .__ .- .-. __. -splys
j13 88 Zep Mfg Co 01-4305-070-70 splys
14 88 Zep Mfo Co 15-4305-060-60 splys
Account Code- -• - - - - Comments
Page 14
Re Pentel 450.00
1.15
J16j 264
77, Totals Terns Check Nurnber 88
20! Temp Check Nurnber
I
2511
----89-Siegler Inc 89 Ziegler Inc
89 Ziegler Inc
1.24
b9 Zieg•l-er-I c---
26.89 Ziegler Inc
89 Ziegler Inc
20,
534
Totals Terno Check Nurnber
89
—01-4330-490-50--
01-4330-490-50
01-4330-490-50
01.-4330-490-50 - --
01-4330-490-50
01-4330-490-50
89
parts
parts
Darts
Darts
solys
parts
450.00
29 97.
39.97
39.97
119.91
310.38
10.25
758 71
28.92
190.00
1.630.42
0
1
22 0
G 0
7 3
8
9
10 0
11 c
12
3
1415 C)
16
17
18 0
2C
21
22 0 23 '✓
zs
26 !l
27
X28
_9
30.
31
22,
33,
34
26
37'
3611
39 @3�
4C
IJ '42
32 ____
43
733 53 44
I333
4 -8601
MANUAL CHECKS: —161
I Grand Total 46
46
35
136 13365 3,284.63 State Capitol C. U 47_ 11/15 payroll deductions 48
137 --1116-6, , 88338 Norwest Bank" , ` 49
5
38 . - - '13368 " 8,212.82 PERA 11/1 payroll . .,, s11
39 `. .- •`13369 400.00 Dakota County Bank 11/15 payroll deductions " .. - 52
40 11370 14,637.93 • 'r _ - •• •" 11/15 w/h 54
41 11371 3,389.26 Commissioner of REvenue 11/15 sit 55
42 11372 43,565.56 Payroll a/c 11/15 net payroll 56
43 11373 . 95.00 Ramsey County warrant 57
441 `11375-381 53,545.00 Mulvihill purchase 59
- - 59
45 GO
_A
46 128,013.78 61
62
47 63
48 G.T. 289,747.31 64
49 65
50 66
67
51 - - - 68
62 69
53 70
71
64 72
I6b 73
C.7 6 74
C.c 75
7 ...7
0
n
ti
•
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ
SUBJECT: House Fire Summary - 538 Stone Road
December 3, 1991
DISCUSSION
Early Saturday morning, November 30, 1991, our Fire Department
was dispatched to a house fire at 538 Stone Road. The involved
structure was a single family house which was under construction
and not yet occupied. By the time the call was received, the
structure was fully involved with flames which were visible through
the roof.
Despite the snow cover which hindered fire fighter response,
our Fire Department responded to the scene within twelve minutes of
receiving the call. City plow crews were on the road at the time
the fire call was received, and were instrumental in assuring that
the fire crews were able to reach the fire scene.
The fire was prevented from spreading to adjacent properties,
but the involved house sustained very heavy damage. Further
details of this fire are included in the attached Fire Marshal's
memo dated December 3, 1991.
ACTION REQUIRED
None. This update is for Council information only. Fire
Chief John Maczko will be present at the beginning of the meeting
to answer any questions Council may have.
MTL:kkb
December 3, 1991
TO: Fire Chief Maczko
FROM: Fire Marshal Kaiser
SUBJECT: House Fire at 538 Stone Road
At approximately 0600 hours on Saturday morning the 30th of
November 1991, a neighbor saw flames coming from an
unoccupied house at 538 Stone Road and, after verifying that
it was a fire, called 911.
The fire department responded with Captain Jamie Lerbs as
Ground Commander. After deploying the fire -fighting team,
Captain Lerbs called for the assistance of the Fire Marshal.
After receiving help from weather problems, I arrived on the
scene at 0815 and started investigating the fire origin and
cause.
During the course of the investigation, conversations were
held with Bob Kiewel, the Contractor; Paul Dorn, the sales
representative; Craig Rudesill, job superintendent; Paul
Davis who was to be the home owner; Brian Tchida, the
painter; Chad Nelson, the electrician and representatives of
American Family Insurance.
In addition to my investigation, the State Fire Marshal's
office was notified of the fire and on Monday December 2,
Denise DeMars, after getting verbal consent to search the
property, conducted an independent investigation of the fire,
interviewed several of the persons identified above, and came
to the same conclusion as to the origin and cause of the
fire.
The fire originated in an area of the house called the
mudroom, located at the northeast corner of the dwelling.
This room was to contain a washer, dryer, vanity and other
items associated with a utility room. The exact location of
the fire was at floor level where a plastic panic tray was
installed. (A panic tray is a device put under a washer in
the event of an overflow. The overflow would go harmlessly
to a basement floor drain). Burn patterns, depth of char to
adjacent wood studs and floor joists point to a slow burning
fire which was later fueled by cardboard cartons containing
noncombustible home items. The heat build-up was enough to
blow out a window and reduce the entry door glass to
splinters which is usually the result of high heat. Once
oxygen reached the smoldering fire it escaped beyond the
point of origin and spread through out the common attic.
When fire origin has been established, the cause of the fire
must be determined. Was it deliberate or accidental.
Indications pointed to an accidental fire. If the fire was
accidental what was the cause. In this case it was necessary
to talk with the job superintendent, Craig Rudesill, who
would know the tradesmen on the jobsite the previous day and
what the workers were doing that might have led to this fire.
Unfortunately Mr. Rudesill was unavailable for an interview
until Monday morning. When the interview did take place it
became known that only one person was on the jobsite the day
before the fire. That person was the painter, Brian Tchida,
whose job was to apply an oil based stain/sealer to the
floors. This application is done with cotton rags because of
the absorbability of the cotton product. It is important in
this process to dispose of the rags in a proper manner such
as in a metal covered can or to the outside atmosphere. Stain
rags have been involved in a previous fire in Mendota Heights
which resulted in a large fire loss. There is also the
previous experience of Bob Kiewel where rags left overnight
in a plastic container, in a panel truck, spontaneously
ignited and destroyed the truck.
It is my opinion and the opinion of the State Fire Marshal
investigator that the rags were not disposed of properly.
Brian Tchida stated that all rags were discarded outside but
there was evidence that a portion of Mr. Tchidas equipment
was at the very location where the fire originated. Mr.
Tchida was the last person to leave this address on Friday
afternoon the 29th of November. He vacated the premises about
1500 hours, locked the garage entry door, closed the garage
doors, took the only key to the building with him, and left.
It is my opinion that he also left the rags on the panic tray
which resulted in this $205,000.00 house fire.
In summary, this was an accidental fire: ignition factor was
spontaneous heating: area of origin was the mudroom: no
equipment was involved: form of ignition was spontaneous
ignition: type of material ignited was oily rags: form of
material ignited was soft goods (cotton rags).
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
November 14, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer
SUBJECT: Budget and Truth in Taxation Hearing
DISCUSSION
The City is required by State Law to hold a public hearing on
the proposed budget and tax levy for the year 1992. Notice has
been published and parcel statements have been mailed by the County
Auditor for the hearing to be held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. on
December'3rd-.
The proposed budget and tax levy has been delivered to each
Council person.. The final product is the result of staff and
Council meetings during July and August.
ACTION REQUIRED
Conduct the public hearing on proposed budget and levy. Adopt
Resolution No. 91- , authorizing final levy for 1992 and adopting
the proposed budget.
LES:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL 1991 TAX LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 1992
AND ADOPTING PROPOSED BUDGET FOR 1992
WHEREAS, the City has previously adopted a Tentative Tax Levy
Resolution No. 91-52 which was subject to revision at the time of
the public hearing, and
WHEREAS, the City has conducted a public hearing on
December 3, 1991, on the tentative budget and tax levy.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council amend
Resolution No. 90-56 to reflect adoption of the following levy for
tax against all taxable property in the City of Mendota Heights for
collection in the year 1992.
General Fund
Emergency Prep.
Fire Relief
Infra Structure Res.
Watershed District
Levy Subject to Limitation
Special Debt Levies
Park Bonds
MWCC Debt
Improvement Bonds
Equipment Cert.
$1,994,978
1,500
14,450
50,000
5,000
$2,065,928
$ 280,000
30,000
17,400
106,000 "
Total Special Levy $ 433,400
Total Levy $2,499,328
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the budget as proposed is deemed
to be practical and reasonable to maintain the City operations and
is hereby approved.
The Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of
this resolution to the Dakota County Auditor.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 3rd
day of December, 1991.
By
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
toe. tomPA‘ ctLo ite .thitemotozL - .
Vile. *Lawnittid i '15pArjAAL.
Lo:EW 9.cota
80o._ pu exv eirruaiiimatim
c3o6 avn.ctriavdazt. G:anatil
City of
Mendota Heights
November 19, 1991
Mr. and Mrs. John Coonan
2540 Concord Way
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Coonan:
Thank you for the copy of your letter to the County
Commissioners. I think I can explain part of your tax change,
however I really do not know the reasoning behind the separate
statements for the garages.
It.would appear that the taxes paid in 1991 are based on land
value only. The value is that at of January 1, 1990. These were
also at the non homestead rate.
The proposed tax for 1992 is based on the value as of
January 1, 1991 and at the homestead rate.
There have been several State mandated changes in the formulas
for computing tax, most of which work against the taxpayer.
Enclosed is a brief letter which explains what has happened to the
City portion of -the levy for 1992.
If you get any answer from the County as to why the garages
are treated as separate parcels, I would be interested in hearing
it.
Thank you for your interest.
LES: kkb
Enclosure
-1;
Sincerely,
E. Shaug.( essy,
Treasurer
- `- �` 1101 Victoria ; Curve :: Mendota Heights MN "55118 462-1850-
.. • •:i.
RESIDENTS OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
We want to thank you for your interest in the proposed City
tax levy for 1992 and the Budget.
The Notice of Tentative Tax Levy, which you have received,
calls for a potential levy of $2,499,328 or an increase of some
six percent.
Under the Truth and Taxation Law, the City must establish a
tentative levy in August, some two months earlier than usual, and
before many of the budget elements can be determined. As a
result, the City has approved a maximum levy set up at our legal
levy limit. Once set, the tentative levy cannot be increased.
The levy is made up of two segments, one is the special
levies for debt service and the other for general City
operations.
The levy for debt service in 1992 shows a major increase of
some $142,188 which represents the second installment on the Park
Bond Issue approved in 1989. Next year will also show an
increase of about $70,000 for the Park Bonds as the balance of
the bonds are issued.
The levy for general City operations is expected to remain
the same at $2,065,000. On a percentage basis, this is zero
percent over the' 1991 levy. The proposed budget is pretty much a
status quo budget, with increases in very few areas. As a
service type organization, our personal service costs are some
$1,710,000 or about 63 percent of our total budget. One new
employee is budgeted for 1992 for the Public Works Department.
Based on the projected budget, the total tax increase of six
percent will be spread over a larger tax base which has grown
between four and five percent. The City levy represents
approximately 18 percent of your total tax bill, and if your home
value has not increased, the proposed tax levy increase will be
in the one to two percent range for City taxes.
The County levy represents about 25 percent of your total
tax bill while the School represents 55 percent. Metro agencies
comprise the balance of the levy.
In addition to the City general operations, we operate two
Enterprise Funds. The Engineering Fund is financed by charges
for City improvements and services which are paid by new
developers and as ;'charges against new construction.
The Sewer Fund is financed through the quarterly sewer
bills. These rates have remained unchanged since 1987. The
primary expense of the Sewer Fund is the charge by the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) for treatment of our
sewer. The MWCC charges to the City have increased over 17
percent during the past two years. In response, we anticipate an
increase in the sewer user charge of approximately ten percent
for 1992. The current rate is $26.00 per quarter minimum. If
MWCC charges continue to increase in the future, we can expect
sewer rate increases in the years 1993 or later.
If you have specific questions on the City Budget or
operations, please give us a call or come to the meeting. A
complete copy of the Budget is available for review at City Hall,
and we will have summaries available at the meeting.
•• n
1/0/%
r,� ? )1.357 a7
/C24-012)2>
GO-(-a-tv-atS)
Act-cf-
/qq(
6 W
� '? —
t 4--4J CL -Q act—OX��e �7
/9'C/( oQ
/1 V lJt,z
City of
.. .' ♦
Mendota Heights
November 13, 1991
Walter Kurtz
580 Maple Park Drive
St. Paul, MN 55118-1838
Dear Wally:
Thanks for your letter regarding the proposed tax on your
property for 1992. Enclosed is a brief statement which helps
explain the City portion of the total levy.
The levy for County and School have increased to a greater
degree, especially the school' which has increased some 16
percent. Considering theamount of your increase, I.would guess
that the valuation of your property has been increased. These
increases were set by the County Assessor and considered by the
Board of Review in April and May. If there was a question about
change in your value that you received it should have been
reviewed with the assessors at that time.
Generally, most of the pass through increasing local level taxes
have been dictated by the State Legislature and the Governor.
Revisions in aid formulas and level of local contribution by the
state make for the increased level of local tax.
I would look first to the valuation of your property, and second,
to the actions of the state for the major portion of your
increase. Our local levy has increased less than 4 percent for
City purposes.
Sincerely,
Larry :aughnessy
Treas r- er
LES:mlk
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights; MN t"55118 452.1850.
RESIDENTS OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
We want to thank you for your interest in the proposed City
tax levy for 1992 and the Budget.
The Notice of Tentative Tax Levy, which you have received,
calls for a potential levy of $2,499,328 or an increase of some
six percent.
Under the Truth and Taxation Law, the City must establish a
tentative levy in August, some two months earlier than usual, and
before many of the budget elements can be determined. As a
result, the City has approved a maximum levy set up at our legal
levy limit. Once set, the tentative levy cannot be increased.
The levy is made up of two segments, one is the special
levies for debt service and the other for general City
operations.
The levy for debt service in 1992 shows a major increase of
some $142,188 which represents the second installment on the Park
Bond Issue approved in 1989. Next year will also show an
increase of about $70,000 for the Park Bonds as the balance of
the bonds are issued.
The levy for general City operations is expected to remain
the same at $2,065,000. On a percentage basis, this is zero
percent over the 1991 levy. The proposed budget is pretty much a
status quo budget, with increases in very few areas. As a
service type organization, our personal service costs are some
$1,710,000 or about 63 percent of our total budget. One new
employee is budgeted for 1992 for the Public Works Department.
Based on the projected budget, the total tax increase of six
percent will be spread over a larger tax base which has grown
between four and five percent. The City levy represents
approximately 18 percent of your total tax bill, and if your home
value has not increased, the proposed tax levy increase will be
in the one to two percent range for City taxes.
The County levy represents about 25 percent of your total
tax bill while the School represents 55 percent. Metro agencies
comprise the balance of the levy.
In addition to the City general operations, we operate two
Enterprise Funds. The Engineering Fund is financed by charges
for City improvements and services which are paid by new
developers and as charges against new construction.
The Sewer Fund is financed through the quarterly sewer
bills. These rates have remained unchanged since 1987. The
primary expense of the Sewer Fund is the charge by the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) for treatment of our
sewer. The MWCC charges to the City have increased over 17
percent during the past two years. In response, we anticipate an
increase in the sewer user charge of approximately ten percent
for 1992. The current rate is $26.00 per quarter minimum. If
MWCC charges continue to increase in the future, we can expect
sewer rate increases in the years 1993 or later.
If you have specific questions on the City Budget or
operations, please give us a call or come to the meeting. A
complete copy of the Budget is available for review at City Hall,
and we will have summaries available at the meeting.
Richard J. Gatti
747 Willow Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
November 14, 1991
Mendota Heights
City Treasurer
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing this letter in response to the information I received regarding
my property taxes for 1992.
I would like to express my concern regarding the proposed increase for 1992
which is estimated to be 23.7%. _.. With ..this proposed increase, my total city
tax increase over the past four years would amount to approximately 64%.
This 1992 proposal would increase my overall taxes paid to the county, city,
and school district by 34.9% in 1992 or a 62% increase in overall taxes
through the past four years.
I understand that cost of operation for services are up and that cuts in state
aid add to the burden, but as a member of this community I would like to ex-
press my concern that a 62% increase in taxes over the last four years puts
a undue burden on the average taxpayer.
Thank you for your concern and cooperation.
RJG/jh
City Estimated Assessor's
Market Value
Tax Levy Rate
Employees
Ten Years in Review
7o-tia.S
vkippkaS OA- A
1981 1991
$219,292,458 $603,384,430
17.67 mills 17.46% Tax Capacity
+5 Police
+2 Public Works
+2 Administration
Population 7,423 9,451
General Fund Budget $1,191,000 $2,629,980
State Aid $326,195 —0—
General Fund Balance $327,135 $1,420,000
Reserve Funds - 660,000
Tax Payer Base Residential 74.9% 59.9%
Commercial/Indust. 25.1 % 40.0%
Public Construction:
Buildings: City Hall $1,750,000
Fire Station 850,000
Public Wks. Garage 500,000
Water/Sewer/Street $11,585,000
Improvements
Parks Improvements 1,700,000
Debt Total $13,465,000 $12,720,000
Sinking Funds Debt 1,906,584 4,046,000
�ocY3 -4`c`s
ANTICIPATED EXPENSE
1991 1992 %
City Council 20,860 19,360 <7.2>
Administration 477,210 484,430 1.5
Elections 18,750 38,010 102.7
Police 1,057,490 1,105,840 4.6
Fire 195,660 203,240 3.9
Code Enforcement 109,730 113,750 3.7
Road & Bridge 365,320 384,440 5.2
Parks 234,030 284,510 21.6
Planning 62,080 59,470 <4.2>
Recycling 60,250 12,370 <205.3>
Animal Control 3,600 4,200 16.7
Legal Expense
Contingency 25,000 0
2,629,980
2,709,620 3.11
ANTICIPATED REVENUES
1991 1992
Tax Levy $1,883,590 $1,994,980
Licenses & Permits 173,050 185,270
Fines 32,700 38,700
Charges for Services 275,230 288,900
Fund Transfers 24,000 17,500
Intergovernmental 80,710 83,710
Miscellaneous 106,800 95,980
Waste Management 53,900 6,820
2,629,980 2,711,860
General Fund
Emergency Preparedness
Fire Relief
Infrastructure Reserve
Watershed District
M.W.C.C. Debt
Equipment Certificates
Park Bonds
Improvement Bonds
HACA & Fiscal Disparities
Adjustments
TAX LEVY
1992 1992 %
1991 Preliminary Proposed Change
$1,883,590 $1,996,780 $1,994,980 5.9%
1,500 1,500 1,500 0%
12,650 12,650 14,450 14.2%
50,000 50,000 50,000 0%
20,000 5,000 5,000 (75.0%)
30,000 30,000 30,000 0%*
162,000 106,000 106,000 (34.6%)*
180,000 280,000 280,000 55.6%*
17,400 17,400 17,400 0%*
(363,580) (428,100) (428,100)
*Denotes Special Levies
Enterprise Funds
Engineering:
Gross Revenues
Expenditures
Z8 3,600
Total Expenditures
Sewer Utility
Gross Revenues
Expenditures
$404,880
369,940
$848,000
Total Expenditures 832,720
MEMO
November 27, 1991
TO: Mayor, Council, City Administrator
FROM: Klayton Eckles x,/
Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Mendota Interchange Storm Sewer Cost Split
INTRODUCTION
The Mendota Interchange Project to be constructed by the
Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDot) starting this
coming spring involves the installation of a complex storm
sewer system that will serve the new highway and portions of
Mendota Heights. MnDot has an elaborate policy which
determines the proper cost sharing between the state and the
city for these improvements.
The city was notified that our participation was calculated
to be more than $800,000. Council ordered staff to work with
BARR Engineering to determine if this was an equitable split
and also to explore methods of reducing the city
participation rate.
BARR has completed its study and has supplied staff with a
draft copy (see attached). BARR did a very professional and
thorough job; BARR's past experience with our city storm
sewer system proved useful, as BARR pointed out how Mendota
Heights might eliminate present and future problems in the
industrial park via the MnDot storm sewer system.
DISCUSSION
This memo will look at two issues which come out of the BARR
report. The first one concerns analyzing and modifying the
MnDot plan to minimize the costs to the city. The second
issue centers around modifying the MnDot storm sewer plan in
order to address some existing drainage problems that the
MnDot design didn't cover.
ISSUE ONE -- Minimizing the City's level of Participation
BARR found that the MnDot cost split is accurate according to
the MnDot policies. However, by modifying the MnDot design
as much as $400,000 can be eliminated from the city's share
of the costs.
After examining all of the options presented by BARR (see
r
tables 2 and 3 of the report), it appears that our best
course of action would be to choose Option 1 in the Stage 1
construction area. This option would eliminate $374,000 of
our participation costs without creating the need for many
future improvements to our own city system.
Option 1 involves re-routing the flow of storm water around
the Big Wheel site to a different holding pond, and adding
one or two holding ponds near the intersection of Acacia and
T.H. 55. The cost of constructing the holding ponds would be
approximately $60,000, and could be accomplished when the
surrounding properties develop in the future.
Many of the other options would require significant city
expenditures in the future, or would create a significant
liability. Therefore none of the other options discussed by
BARR in the attached report seem cost effective or prudent.
Option 3 of Stage 1 is a completely separate issue and will
be discussed later in this memo.
If Option 1 of Stage 1 construction is chosen, the City
contribution would be $431,000 based on BARR's findings.
However, BARR completed its study on the assumption that the
MnDot policy must be adhered to. Staff has several
objections to the MnDot policy on more philosophical than
technical grounds.
First, this interchange project creates its own drainage
problems because it requires changes in the landscape of up
to 17 feet. Such drastic changes make it difficult to design
a storm sewer independent of the interchange. Simply piping
city storm water underneath the interchange is no longer
feasible.
Second, MnDot is not giving any credit for cross culverts.
Normally MnDot pays for cross culverts, but in this project
all the drastic landscape changes mean cross culverts aren't
feasible. It could be argued that we should get some credit
for cross culverts.
Third, MnDot uses a contributing flow method of cost
splitting that does not pay heed to the benefit received by
the surrounding property. This is unfair when considering
the fact that approximately 45 acres of drainage area is
cemetery land. A cemetery is not taxable or assessable, and
it provides a regional rather than local service. Mendota
Heights taxpayers shouldn't be required to pay the tab for
tax exempt land.
These factors are difficult to quantify. It is obvious that
the MnDot storm sewer is providing a benefit to many of the
properties. The level of this benefit is the main point of
disagreement. If MnDot is willing to accept BARR's proposed
changes, and if MnDot is willing to consider the other points
of disagreement, Staff thinks that the MnDot storm plan and
cost split would be workable.
ISSUE TWO -- Drainage at Mendota Hts. Rd and Pilot Knob Rd
BARR Engineering not only prepared the attached report, but
is also completing our Water Resources Management Plan that
is required to meet State law. In the Water Resources
Management plan, BARR identified drainage problem areas in
the City. One such area is the intersection of Mendota
Heights Road and Pilot Knob Road.
This intersection suffered severe flooding problems in the
July 1987 super storm. Recall that the Printware building
had over 2 feet of water in the building, and also the city
sewer lift station was inundated. Although that storm was a
freak event, at the time of the storm the industrial park was
less than half developed. BARR's studies indicate that the
entire industrial park storm sewer system is under designed,
and a major improvement is warranted.
In doing the attached report, BARR saw an opportunity to
eliminate the industrial park flooding problem. By hooking
into the MnDot system with a new storm sewer for the
industrial park our problem could be solved. The solution
that BARR has proposed looks to be the best and most
inexpensive solution to a serious problem. Option 3 of Stage
1 construction incorporates this solution into the MnDot
storm sewer design.
Option 3 would increase the city's total participation by
$284,000. In the future the city would still have to
complete about $270,000 in improvements within the industrial
park to eliminate the industrial park drainage problem, but
staff sees this as the most cost effective option by a
significant margin. (Another option would be to turn a 5
acre parcel in the industrial park into a huge holding pond,
but this option would be expensive and would eliminate a
prime industrial site).
Summary of Issues One and Two
To summarize the costs involved in both issues discussed
above the following table is provided.
City Share According to MnDot -- $803,000
According to BARR --
Option 1, Stage 1 Construction
City Share of Pilot Knob Storm sewer
City Share of Stage 2 Construction
Subtotal of BARR's cost split
$146,000
$101,000
$184,000
$431,000
Future Cost to City or Developer for Pond $60,000
Total Cost to City for Interchange Storm Sewer $491,000
Extra for Industrial Park stub (opt 3) $284,000
Total with Industrial Park Stub $775,000
In addition to the storm sewer costs connected with the
Mendota Interchange Project, the City will incur future costs
to complete the storm sewer system within the industrial park
to eliminate the Mendota Heights Road/Pilot Knob Road
drainage problem.
Extend the Storm Stub into Industrial Park $270,000
Grand Total $1,045,000
What this shows is that using BARR's design for Stage 1
construction lowers the city's participation in the Mendota
Interchange from $803,000 to $431,000, but the city (or more
likely a developer) will incur a future cost to construct two
holding ponds at a cost of $60,000. Therefore the net cost
savings to the city if the BARR proposal is used would be
$312,000.
If we decide to address the Industrial Park storm problem in
conjunction with the Mendota Interchanve project, we will
add approximately $284,000 to our participation level.
However we would be getting something we want and need for
this higher participation level. At a later date we would
have to complete a $270,000 project of our own to finish the
industrial park storm sewer improvement.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the following:
1) Council adopt Option 3 of Stage 1 construction as
presented by BARR Engineering as the City's approved storm
sewer design for the Mendota Interchange Project. This
option includes the additional ponds proposed under Option
1 and a storm sewer stub which could be used to correct a
storm sewer problem in the industrial park.
2) Council reject the cost split proposed by MnDot, and
request MnDot to recalculate the cost split with the
following adjustments:
a) The proposed BARR storm sewer design should be used in
the recalculation.
b) Credit for the cost of the many cross culverts that
could have been included if not for the grade changes,
should be addressed.
c) Tax exempt properties which provide a regional or state
wide benefit should not be included in the Mendota
Heights side of the cost split equation.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs with Staff's recommendations then Council
should pass Resolution 91- , RESOLUTION REJECTING THE
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S COST SPLIT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWERS AS PART OF THE MENDOTA
INTERCHANGE PROJECT, AND REQUEST OR REDESIGN AND
REEVALUATION.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -
RESOLUTION REJECTING THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION'S COST SPLIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
STORM SEWERS AS PART OF THE MENDOTA INTERCHANGE PROJECT,
AND REQUEST FOR.REDESIGN AND REEVALUATION.
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDot)
intends to construct a project known as the Mendota
Interchange complete with storm sewer improvements; and
WHEREAS, MnDot staff has prepared a cost split between the
State of Minnesota and the City of Mendota Heights for the
storm sewer improvements; and
WHEREAS, the proposed cost split was based on MnDot policies
used for typical projects which lack the extraordinary •
conditions of the Mendota Interchange project including but
not limited to: extreme changes in grade, alteration of
established flow patterns, construction that will be below
bedrock in areas, construction in an area with contamination
problems, construction in an area with over 45 acres of
Cemetery property, construction in an area with historical
buildings, and construction along the Minnesota River Bluffs;
and
WHEREAS, these extraordinary conditions have increased the
cost of constructing the storm sewer, and have eliminated
options and alternatives available to the City of Mendota
Heights; and
WHEREAS, The design of the Mendota Interchange is based on
the needs and desires of the State and MnDot, and the Mendota
Interchange will provide a benefit at the regional and State
level; and
WHEREAS, the MnDot design is primarily intended to address
MnDot drainage issues and minimize MnDot costs, Mendota
Heights commissioned BARR Engineering Company to examine the
proposed design and propose enhancements and methods of cost
reduction; and
WHEREAS, BARR Engineering came up with several options which
would significantly reduce the Mendota Heights portion of the
costs, and BARR Engineering proposed additions to the Mendota
Interchange storm sewer system which would eliminate the
possibility of future storm water problems in Mendota
Heights; and
WHEREAS, the cost split performed by MnDot included over 45
acres of tax exempt property in the City of Mendota Heights
contribution. This tax exempt property, being primarily
cemeteries, provides a regional rather than local service,
and there is no mechanism by which Mendota Heights may
recapture these costs; and
WHEREAS, MnDot typically pays for cross culverts, but due to
the complexity of this project no cross culverts are
proposed; andPVl
WHEREAS, ota eights Aja
Mendthe Interchange
project, wants to see the Interchange project
resolved one way or the other; and
WHEREAS, MnDot now intends to try to complete the Interchange
project between 1992 and 1994.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City of Council
of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows:
1. The City of Mendota Heights is in favor of a rapid
completion of the Mendota Interchange project.
2. The City of Mendota Heights rejects the storm sewer cost
split proposed by MnDot.
3. The City of Mendota Heights will participate in funding qmD
of the MnDot storm sewer if the following items are
addressed:
a) Option 3 of Stage 1 construction, as described in the
BARR Engineering Cost Reduction Study is considered
the optimal solution for the City of Mendota Heights.
-}ac. optima)._
b) Option 2 of Stage 1 construction, as described in the
BARR Engineering Cost Reduction Study, discusses
possible cross culvert savings. These cross culverts
and other similar cases should be examined and either
implemented, or a credit be given to Mendota Heights
for the fact that a cross culverts can not be
installed due to extreme grade changes by MnDot.
c) As Mendota Heights receives absolutely no benefit from
the storm sewer serving the tax exempt parcels in this
project, the cost split should reflect this fact.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights
this Third Day of December, 1991.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ATTEST: By
Charles E. Mertensotto,
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk Mayor
Mendota Interchange Storm Sewer
Cost Reduction Study
Draft Report
City of Mendota Heights
November 27, 1991
Prepared by:
Barr Engineering Company
Mendota Interchange Storm Sewer
Cost Reduction Study
Draft Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. Introduction 1
A. Acacia/Highway 55 Study Area 1
B. Highway 110/Mendota Area 2
II. Cost Participation Formulas 3
A. Ratio of Peak Discharges 3
B. Other Costs 4
C. Hydrologic Analysis 4
III. Results 6
A. Acacia/Highway 55 Area 6
B. Highway 110/Mendota Area 8
APPENDIX Mn/DOT Position Statement
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1 Mendota Interchange Drainage Facilities Cost Participation - Preliminary
Estimate
TABLE 2 Estimated Cost Participation for Various Options - Acacia/Highway 55 Area
TABLE 3 Estimated Cost Participation for Various Options - Highway 110/Mendota
Area
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 Location Map
FIGURE 2 Acacia/Highway 55 Study Area
FIGURE 3 Highway 110/Mendota Study Area
23\19\210\COSTRED.RPT\TMK
I. Introduction
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has developed an estimate of the
cost participation for storm sewer work as part of the "Mendota Interchange" project. Mn/DOT
estimated the total cost for the storm sewer work, excluding the cost of "detention ponding
areas" and "culvert installation", to be $1,879,000. The preliminary cost participation between
Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Mendota, and Mn/DOT is given in Table 1. Mendota
Heights' share of the costs is $803,000, which is approximately 43 percent of the total price.
The objective of this study was to identify drainage options which would reduce Mendota
Heights share of the cost.
This study divided the Mendota Interchange project into two areas; the Acacia/
Highway 55 and the Highway 110/Mendota areas. These study areas are referred to as stages 1
and 2, respectively, by Mn/DOT in their cost sharing calculations. The location of these study
areas are shown in Figure 1. The Acacia/Highway 55 Area ("Stage 1") is south of the
highway 110 and 55 interchange and consists of the area adjacent to highways 55 and 13 which
will drain to the south and west along the new alignment of Highway 13 to approximately the
I-494 bridge. The Highway 110/Mendota Area (Stage 2) consists of the area adjacent to
Highway 110 from approximately Lexington Avenue west to the City of Mendota. The majority
of Mendota Heights costs are for the drainage facilities in the Acacia/Highway 55 Area. A
more detailed description of these areas are below.
The methodology used by Mn/DOT to develop the cost sharing estimate is discussed in
Section 11 along with the methods used by Barr Engineering Co. and the City to lower the City's
share of the costs. The results of the analysis are summarized in Section III. The remaining
part of this section gives a more detailed description of the areas being studied.
A. Acacia/Highway 55 Study Area
The Acacia/Highway 55 Area is shown in Figure 2. Included in the figure is the area
which is drained by the proposed Mn/DOT system and the Mn/DOT Right of Way (ROW).
The total area consists of approximately 122 acres, of which approximately 50 acres are within
the Mn/DOT ROW. Mn/DOT proposes to construct a storm sewer system from the Acacia
Blvd. crossing over Highway 55 to a ponding area immediately northwest of the I-494 crossing
over Highway 13. Mn/DOT is providing two detention ponding areas in this system. The first
is at the southwest corner of Pilot Knob and Highway 13 (Pond "B") and the second is at the
outlet of the system, near I-494 (Pond "D").
Detention ponds serve to lower the costs of storm sewer systems by reducing the rate of
flow. The water flowing into a detention pond is stored in the ponds and is released at a much
slower rate than it enters the pond. The water is released at slower rate because the outlet pipe
from the pond is usually much smaller than the inlet pipe(s). In the proposed Mn/DOT
Pond "B" the inlet consists of a 54 -inch pipe while the outlet is an 18 -inch pipe. No designated
detention ponds currently exist in the area tributary to the Mn/DOT system outside of the ROW.
The area which is tributary to the Mn/DOT drainage system, outside of the ROW, will
consist of industrial land uses when fully developed. A small portion of the area consists of
land in Acacia Cemetery. Industrial land uses have a larger amount of impervious area which
generate greater volumes and rates of runoff than areas in natural condition. Therefore, the
high density land uses in the area drained by the Mn/DOT system is one of the reasons why the
City's share of the costs were so high in the preliminary cost participation estimate. Detention
ponds in the City's portion of the watershed would serve to reduce the peak flows in the storm
sewer system.
23\19\210\COSTRED.RPT\TMK 1
One of the factors to consider for this area is that the existing drainage system in the
Industrial Park needs improvements. It is estimated that serious flooding will occur at the
corner of Pilot Knob and Mendota Heights Road during a 100 -year rainfall event (a rainfall with
1 percent chance of occurring in any given year). The Draft Mendota Heights Water Resources
Management Plan recommends the construction of a storm sewer from the Pilot Knob/Mendota
Heights Road intersection along Mendota Heights Road to the Highway 13 system. This system
would contribute substantial flows to the Mn/DOT system, downstream of Mendota Heights
Road.
B. Highway 110/Mendota Area
The Highway 110/Mendota Area is shown in Figure 3. Included in Figure 3 is the
Mn/DOT ROW, the boundary between Mendota and Mendota Heights, and the area drained by
the Mn/DOT system in this area. The total tributary area to the Mn/DOT drainage system is
approximately 183 acres, of which approximately 105 acres is within the City of Mendota and
the Mn/DOT ROW.
Mn/DOT plans to construct two detention ponds in the area. These ponds are designated
Pond "A" and Pond "E" in Figure 3. The existing pond located on the northwest comer of
Highway 110 and Lexington Avenue will also discharge into the Mn/DOT system. The
assumed full development land use in the area outside of the ROW include industrial/
commercial, residential, and cemetery.
23\19\210\COSTRED.RPT\TMK 2
II. Cost Participation Formulas
In August, 1985 Mn/DOT released a position statement in regards to cooperative
construction projects. The portion of this position statement related to drainage projects is
included as an appendix to this report. In the position statement Mn/DOT gives three methods
of cost sharing for drainage projects. These methods are:
• Ratio of Peak Discharges
• Ratio of Contribution Flows
• Oversizing
The ratio of peak discharges was used in the Mn/DOT cost sharing estimate for the
Mendota Interchange Project. This methodology is described below. The other two methods,
the ratio of contribution flows and oversizing, were not applicable in this case and are not
discussed further.
A. Ratio of Peak Discharges
Cost sharing based on the method of ratio of peak discharge is simply based on the
contribution of each party to the peak flow through each section of pipe. The peak flow is
calculated using a hydrologic model which uses data such as land use, watershed area, flow
length and soil type. Mn/DOT used the "rational method" for calculating the peak discharges
for the Mendota Interchange cost participation. The peak discharge from the "10 -year" storm
was used in the cost sharing formula for the Mendota Interchange project. The 10 -year storm
is the storm with a 10 percent chance of occurring in any given year. The 10 -year storm is the
storm the Mn/DOT storm sewer system was designed for.
The cost for a participating party for each section of pipe is calculated by the following
formula:
CP = (QP / Qww) x cote
where:
Cp = Participating party's share of cost
Ctotal
= Total cost of pipe section
QP
Qtota _
Peak discharge through pipe section from participating
contributing watershed area (cubic feet per second)
Peak discharge through pipe section from entire watershed (cubic feet
per second)
The area (or "watershed") which contributes water to each section of pipe is determined
using available maps. The breakdown of area which is in the City, the ROW and in any other
participating party (such as the County or another city) is then determined. The land use in
the watershed (usually assumed to be fully developed) is also determined.
party's
23\19\210\COSTRED.RPT\TMK 3
B. Other Costs
As part of the Mendota Interchange project, Mn/DOT has agreed to pay the costs of the
detention ponds within the highway ROW. Mn/DOT is to also pick up the costs of culverts
crossing the highway from existing drainages. According to the Mn/DOT position paper, the
municipality should not be charged for "...furnishing and installing culverts in establishing
waterways that cross the trunk highway, unless some special design feature of sole benefit to
the municipality increases the cross sectional area. Such as increased runoff due to diverted
drainage."
C. Hydrologic Analysis
Various drainage options were studied to determine their effect in reducing Mendota
Heights' proportion of the cost for the Mendota interchange storm sewer work. The cost sharing
formula based on peak discharges discussed above was used to estimate the cost sharing for
these options. Hydrologic methods used for the Mendota Heights Water Resources Management
Plan were used in developing the hydrology for the study area.
The two study areas (Acacia/Highway 55 and Highway 110/Mendota) were divided into
several smaller watersheds which correspond to inflow points to the proposed Mn/DOT storm
sewer system. The watersheds were determined using maps provided by Mn/DOT and the
City's topographic maps. Full development land use was determined using the City's
comprehensive plan and information obtained from City staff.
The Barr Watershed Model (BWM) which was developed at Barr Engineering Co. was
used to estimate the peak discharges. This model develops a hydrograph (a time vs. flow
relationship for a given rainfall event) for each watershed and correspondingly routes the
hydrographs between the watersheds and through detention ponds. This model is more
sophisticated than the rational method that was used in by Mn/DOT in their analysis. The
rational method is used only to estimate peak discharges for a watershed. It should not be used
in the design or analysis of detention basins. Mn/DOT used a separate model in the analysis
of the detention basins in their system. Since different methods were used to estimate peak
discharges in the storm sewer system, the results varied slightly between Mn/DOT and the
City's calculations. The differences in results due to the use of different models were minor in
most cases.
In the analysis of the Highway 110/Mendota Study Area, it was found that the hydrologic
analysis done for the City and by Mn/DOT varied significantly in some locations. This was
found to be due to differences in watershed areas between the two analyses. Also, it was found
in the Mn/DOT calculations that some of the selected pipe sizes were larger than what was
needed to convey the peak discharge for the 10 -year event. Because of differences in the
Mn/DOT analysis and the one performed for this study, it was assumed that the pipe costs
would remain constant for any option studied. Therefore, the total cost for the project in this
area remained the same. Only the cost proportions were changed, based on the ratio of peak
discharges.
Various drainage options were studied to determine if costs can be reduced (both Mendota
Heights' cost and the total project cost). The drainage options included diverting flow to other
watersheds and the construction of detention basins. The following steps were followed in the
estimation of the cost participation for the different drainage options:
23\19\210\COSTRED.RPT\TMK 4
1) The storm sewer system was analyzed assuming only the Mn/DOT ROW
contributed flow to the system. Peak discharges were tabulated at key points in the
storm sewer system.
2) The storm sewer system was analyzed assuming all areas contributed flow and peak
discharges were estimated for the same key points as in Step 1.
3) The pipe sizes required for the system analyzed in Step 2 were estimated, assuming
no City improvements are constructed. Mn/DOT's and Mendota Heights proportion
of flow were determined using the results from Step 1. If a pipe size was found
to be different than what Mn/DOT determined, the cost was adjusted based on the
ratio of the pipe costs.
As discussed above, the pipe sizes and total cost were not adjusted for the analysis
of the Highway 110/Mendota Area..
4) Various City improvements, such as ponds and diversions, were placed in the
hydrologic model. New peak discharges were calculated for both areas and new
pipe sizes and costs were estimated for the Acacia/Highway 55 area, assuming the
City improvements were put in place. The ratio of peak discharges are recalculated
using the results from Step 1.
5) The difference of the costs calculated in steps 4 and 3 were used to determine an
estimated cost savings for various drainage options. .
23\19\210\COSTRED.RPT\TMK 5
M. Results
The results of the analysis of the drainage options are discussed in this section. Tables 2
and 3 show the costs estimated for various drainage options for the Acacia/Highway 55 and
Highway 110/Mendota areas, respectively. The tables also show the comparison between the
Mn/DOT cost sharing estimate using the rational method and the one developed for the City
using the Barr Watershed Model. Both estimates were developed assuming no City
improvements were made. The comparison shows that there is a slight difference in the results
using two different models. The difference, however, appears to be insignificant. The analysis
and results for these area are discussed below.
A. Acacia/Highway 55 Area
Three drainage options were studied in this area, all of which reduce Mendota Heights
share of the cost. Figure 2 shows the location of these options. The options studied were:
1) This option included the construction of three detention ponds and the routing of
flow from approximately 16 acres of area into an existing detention pond in the
industrial park storm sewer system using a cross culvert under Highway 13. It was
also assumed that Mn/DOT would pick up part of the cost for the pipes receiving
flow from the existing industrial park system.
2) Same as above, except assume that all areas outside of the ROW downstream of
Pond "B" are assumed to be provided with culverts under the roadway.
3) Same as Option 1 except that a storm sewer is constructed from the Pilot Knob/
Mendota Heights Road intersection to the Mn/DOT system.
The estimated costs for the systems are shown in Table 2. It should be noted that these
costs are only estimates and should be considered preliminary. The actual cost will be
dependant on Mn/DOT final plans and bids. The improvements to Pilot Knob Road are not
included in the cost sharing estimates except for the section of pipe from the Commerce Avenue
pond to Highway 13.
1. Option 1
In this option, it is proposed to construct three detention ponds. Two of the ponds
would be located east and west of Acacia Blvd.(shown in Watersheds la and le in
Figure 2), immediately south of the Highway 55 ROW. A third pond will be
constructed on the northwest corner of Pilot Knob Road and the new alignment of
Highway 13 (Watershed 415 in Figure 2). Approximately 16 acres northeast of the
Pilot Knob/Highway 13 intersection (Watershed 10) would flow to the north in a
culvert under the Highway 13 ROW to an existing pond ("GC -20") which drains
to the industrial park system. It is assumed that Mn/DOT will pay for the culvert
under Highway 13 because the area tributary to it naturally tributary to the
industrial park system. Also, as part of this option, it is assumed that Mn/DOT will
pick up the cost of the crossing of the industrial park system outflow under
Highway 13.
The routing of runoff from Watershed 10 to the GC -20 pond was found to have
insignificant impacts on the industrial park drainage system. The GC -20 pond is
currently underused and has adequate storage capacity to receive the additional
runoff.
23\19\210\COSTRED.RP'I\TMK 6
The estimated cost for this option is given in Table 2. Mendota Heights share of
the cost using this option would be approximately $146,000, a reduction of
approximately $370,000 from the original cost share estimate. This estimate,
however, does not include the cost for the construction of the detention ponds. The
option also does not take into account the proposed storm sewer along Mendota
Heights Road.
2. Option 2
This option is similar to Option 2 except that it assumes that Mn/DOT picks up the
entire cost of the drainage outside of the ROW downstream of Pond "B". All of
the area outside of the ROW in this location consists of areas which currently drain
down the bluff and under the existing Highway 13 and to the Minnesota River.
The proposed Mn/DOT system picks up these flows and carries it to the Minnesota
River via Pond "D". According to the Mn/DOT position paper, the municipality
should not be charged for furnishing and installing culverts in established
waterways. Therefore, this option assumes that cross culverts would be installed
and paid for by Mn/DOT.
Mendota Heights' proportion of the cost for this option is approximately $55,000.
This option gives the lowest Mendota Heights cost of the three. This option, like
Option 1, does not take the discharge from the Mendota Heights Road storm sewer
into account. There may also be additional costs involved in controlling the erosion
from the point discharges created from the culverts under the new Highway 13.
The culverts would discharge down steep slopes and there will be a potential for
erosion.
3. Option 3
This option is the same as Option 1 except that improvements are made to the
industrial park storm sewer system. Flow from the Pilot Knob/Mendota Heights
Road intersection would be diverted to the Mn/DOT system along Highway 13.
Because this water is not naturally tributary to the Mn/DOT system at this point,
Mendota Heights will have to pay for a large proportion of the cost of the system
from Mendota Heights Road to Pond "D". Discharges in excess of 300 cubic feet
per second (cfs) are expected in the Mendota Heights Road storm sewer. Because
the storm sewer would be designed for the 100 -year discharge from the intersection,
the 100 -year discharge from the Mendota Heights Road storm sewer was used in
the sizing the pipes in the system downstream of Mendota Heights Road.
Mendota Height's proportion of the cost of this option is estimated to be
approximately $430,000. This option is the most is the most expensive of the three
items because it includes a stub for the Mendota Heights Road storm sewer. The
largest proportion of Mendota Heights cost is between Mendota Heights Road and
Pond "D". Peak discharges are increased in this section of the Mn/DOT storm
sewer by a factor of 12 due to the discharge from the Mendota Heights road storm
sewer.
23\19\210\COSTRED.RPT\TMK 7
B. Highway 110/Mendota Area
Four drainage options were studied in this area, all of which reduce Mendota Heights
share of the cost to some degree. Figure 3 shows the location of these options. All of the
options consist of constructing detention basins outside of the Mn/DOT ROW. It was assumed
that the cost savings calculated for options would only be due to the reduction in Mendota
Heights' share of the peak discharge. No pipe downsizing was assumed. Additional saving may
occur due to some downsizing of pipes because of detention ponds constructed by the City. The
additional savings, however, will be small because of the small proportion of the costs the City
would be paying for the pipe. Estimated costs for these options are given in Table 3.
1. Option 1
This option assumed that a pond would be placed in Watershed Y4a.
Approximately 5.2 acres of area of would drain to this pond. It was assumed this
land would have industrial/commercial land uses when fully developed.
Approximately $5,000 to $20,000 would be saved with this option, not including
the cost of constructing the pond.
2. Option 2
This option assumed that a pond would be constructed at the north end of Pilot
Knob Road in Watershed Y5a. The full development land use in this watershed
was assumed to be industrial/commercial and cemetery. Less money would be
saved with this option than with Option 1 because the outflow from this watershed
is farther downstream on the Mn/DOT storm sewer.
3. Option 3
This option assumes both ponds in Option 1 and Option 2 are constructed. The
combined cost savings was estimated to be $15,000 to 30,000, not including the
cost of constructing the ponds.
4. Option 4
This option assumes that both ponds in Option 1 and Option 2 are constructed. It
is also assumed that a third pond is constructed in Watershed 10b along the toe of
the bluffs, south of Highway 55 and east of the railroad tracks. There is a limited
amount of land available for constructing a pond in this area because of the steep
slopes. The total cost savings for this option range from approximately $28,000 to
$45,000, not including the cost of constructing the ponds.
23\19\210\COSTRED.RPT\TMK 8
Table 1
MENDOTA INTERCHANGE DRAINAGE FACILITIES COST PARTICIPATION - PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE
FIRST STAGE LETTING DATE 2-28-92
C_S_A_H_ 31
C.B. •& Leads
Mainline Trunk Sewer
T.H. 55 To Pond "B"
Mainline Trunk Sewer
C.B. & Leads
P "B" to Pond "D"
Mendota Heiahta Dakota County Mendota Mn/DOT
26,858 32,854
77,932 2,182
104,790 35,036
266,000
Mainline Trunk Sewer 202,000
+ Eng.
572,790
x 1.08
Stage 1 Subtotal 618,600
SECOND STAGE L_RTTING DATE 1 - 93
Wetland #3 to Dry Pond "E"
Me'nline Trunk Sewer
C. . & Leads
Dry Pond "E" to Pond
Mainline Trunk Sewer
C.B. & Leads
Pond "A" to Minnesota River
Mainline Trunk Sewer
C.B. & Leads
+ Eng.
Stage 2 Subtotal
34,000
53,000
84,000
171,000
x 1.08
184,700
Stage 1 and 2 Total $803,300
35,036
x 1.08
152,000
80,000
80,000
312,000
x 1.08
37,800 336,960
30,000
30,000
x 1.08
56,000
40,000
220,000
70,000
173,000
60,000
619,000
x 1.08
32,400 668,520
$37,800 $32,400 $1,005,500*
*Detention pond construction and culvert installation costs not included.
(100% Mn/DOT costs)
TABLE 2
ESTIMATED COST PARTICIPATION FOR VARIOUS OPTIONS*
ACACIA/HIGHWAY 55 AREA
* Cost for the storm sewer improvements on C.S.A.H. 31 (Pilot Knob Road) is not included
in these cost estimates except for the section of pipe between the proposed Commerce
Avenue pond and Highway 13. Mn/DOT estimated cost for the Mendota Heights share
of the C.S.A.H. 31 storm sewer, excluding the section of pipe discussed above, is
approximately $101,000.
23\19\210\COSTRED.RPT\TMK
Total
City
Mn/DOT
Mn/DOT Assessment (using Rational
Method with no City improvements)
$854,000
$517,000
$337,000
City Estimate (using Barr Watershed Model
with no City improvements)
$847,000
$492,000
$355,000
Option 1 (includes north and south Acacia
Blvd. and Commerce Avenue Ponds, and
cross culvert from Watershed 10)
$582,000
$146,000
$436,000
Option 2 (same as Option 1 except that
cross culverts provided for all areas outside
of the ROW downstream of Mn/DOT
Pond B)
$582,000
$55,000
$527,000
Option 3 (same as Option 1 except that the
improved Mendota Heights Road storm
sewer is assumed to flow into the Mn/DOT
system)
$869,000
$430,000
$439,000
* Cost for the storm sewer improvements on C.S.A.H. 31 (Pilot Knob Road) is not included
in these cost estimates except for the section of pipe between the proposed Commerce
Avenue pond and Highway 13. Mn/DOT estimated cost for the Mendota Heights share
of the C.S.A.H. 31 storm sewer, excluding the section of pipe discussed above, is
approximately $101,000.
23\19\210\COSTRED.RPT\TMK
TABLE 3
ESTIMATED COST PARTICIPATION FOR VARIOUS OPTIONS
HIGHWAY 110/MENDOTA AREA
* Combined City of Mendota and Mn/DOT cost share.
23\19\210\COSTRED.RPT\TMK
Total
City
MnDOT/Mendota*
Mn/DOT Assessment (using the
Rational Method with no City
improvements)
$885,000
$184,000
$701,000
City Assessment (using the Barr
Watershed Model with no City
improvements)
$885,000
$201,000
$684,000
Option 1 (Pond in Watershed Y4a)
$885,000
$180,000
$705,000
Option 2 (Pond in Watershed Y5a)
$885,000
$192,000
$693,000
Option 3 (Ponds in Watersheds Y4a
and Y5a)
$885,000
$170,000
$715,000
Option 4 (Ponds in Watersheds Y4a
and Y5a and 10b)
$885,000
$156,000
$729,000
* Combined City of Mendota and Mn/DOT cost share.
23\19\210\COSTRED.RPT\TMK
0 1000
SCALE IN FEET
PROPOSED PIPE LOCATION
TRIBUTARY WATERSHED TO
DRAINAGE SYSTEM
ARK SYSTEM
MnDOT
POND D
MnOG
PONE
MENDO7Af
Figure 1
LOCATION MAP
� ZbZ4-b£6 (Zl9)
— t�ESS elosauuiyy 'auis�d uaP3
P�a �eIIEM 08pB
Bu�uueb BuptaunS P�'1 Bu�aeul�+3
� -�u� �sa�e��ossti
,. � . ■.. � �a6an�� uo�
� - �rv> >�� S � �� � ���
�
Z :
. _,�.._ `r�-..
�V � v...e... ._ . ...
' -�.�
�� WM dlp �9� .�� � � "�,.
bMH��H Nos�,_
3��3r
ab'aH ri�7
nFBAi _........�....� ib-oa-9u�a
— __._.. .---- j�p�
o�o�(- "rU
� � � �oura�auiof1w�n�uran --�F�
mwuioaY ��na � w� i i� a�r �o�a��rq
�;HIIIO.U� IDOIII YO 11� M 011�A1� f�M il10YY
YO NOlIV�p� 5ry?i fMl l�Ml AILL1p AOv11
\ � .
i \ti
� \�
I \
M .00 ,80 ,00 S
00'04
� 8g ,s`q P � I
� �(
,. y .t. -� � i
� � �
�
� �
v: , � �
. �... J ...., ,
a �
�V� JgMe� � .. .� -- �.,.��, ,
V�eS _ _ �' �,. ; `�,.,,, �
�� `��� ,6 . :` -,
'`` `` � f yg .....,_ !O
\� `
`\,\,
� `�BB2�20'& � ..
S� HW .
NW `S1HJI3H b10aN3W �
S31b�1S3 N33a� 3Nld �
�.� °� �', C
� T' N �
lb'ld Jltib�NlWll3tid �� o' � � �
�,�,..-�. a
>
w
� N
m i
Q O ¢
W
W` t Q � p �
J � W � jOJ 1-OZ
�y W�% W LL LL f U
� i 2 w W q O J W
~� Y N N 3 6= g
I M Z V 6 6 O Q p 6
f � � � J �� 0
I W O m 6 6 I 1 O d
�Z f � Z
I O 2 \I i
W
I� � �
J �
6 < Q F
I� J p y m F � Q I J
,c � o m Z i o= � F
s w�'=O Q � U �
W�¢ � W U W� Y Y
O O
Q W F U� � m> S V W W W
N N
? q F f � a i� i ��., �
< W f0 N V¢�1 � Q 6 �
� K K Q r� J �� Q O O
� W W J F 2 p; 1- (� 6 6
a
a
z
0
�
a
U
O
J
a
a a
E �
a
L � �
oso ;; o g_ ` m
�iEiinm'v�o �m� c�e gm3mm'��.'a
ObmNN iwa � Om:- oN �
0 P N � f�i o.- � N N Pni � N�n i0 N^
�- N N O YI IG n b P O � m Cl O �fl tO n Y W O � M
NNNNN[V NNNt�t1 m m W���� �+�
V �
n �
>
¢ N
0 m S b �d
S�l.- g• p •
i n'S n n� a n d� a n n p o 3 3� a p
�<'O W 00}V � f.. `
NN �`j� �OO�YOI`Ipfp�p
O l�lO.-� �r.-��..•-
�` �.j n pj � O N W
O Z� �••.. �^ �^�e�vnonmo�. a n v imm� maN .
U c n J o � o
G> p N M o0 V
Y N C 0 � � �
C > N p � � �
. � «'L- C N a (p �
� �`0 — O N� Q Y
C 7 C L J C --� m � .
� � � r ,� — C f/1 -O C . �,
O O � c O _
D y��a Z� �p � a O �, a`�
c p N C v� o �m � N
� 'O O � L � � 2 E� a Y
G � 0 l0 � O �
'>. a�� p ip O O � a U
O W 3 C T� � G) O�
(p � V N � U� � � 3� N � N
.� V C y N ' 'p E N
"� m� t t6 � V p C O J C �
� '�= a3L c � � m = �n
c � t� rV a`>mo 3 >Z
� C L�� 7) C N ^ S� N� y p 1% ,� C
w -�' a� a c o:..° c�. � m � E m g a_�i
� � � .�c �� Cn n V m c�.� a�i a� c c� n
m �°' a"'i`.ca �Q'° o Y �m
� �
a Z�°n � 3 i. '- m °8 a.0 3> E� m m � C7 � r
a`� - c° m>. c g°'� c�`
w� �C C m 0� N
m:.: � m� c�i t a c �° a�i m� m o a� o o v
� 3,. �'�- a�i �' °� o � m ��� D ' :n a a co C7 u�
p.°��°°'_�oa ���a3i3 �,o mmm m a`u'im
roo � �,°�'-m �,v'Tc� o oine
O o a� � o� N ¢ E �� d� o n n v�- >. �,
v°> aUi � � o� ac- o �°�' � a�i o� ri o o.- o E E n
� c�' - m v' o D a � �> c a L �v m �p voi
� C�?` ° L V C � � N C N
C O N N �« N C O N 41 m
0� O d� m Z r OI L � E� j N�� '!A t� N y � �l � �, Z
d��~� L� N C 3 >� J L � L� t0 7 O 00 �� Y Z ��
O� y9 � d V C C C N OI CO h� � fC � y..N.
¢ C(/J � O N— � U N>. O�� N O M O O N� •- •- � ,C L
(A O� C� �� L>' D N `. p_ m M N°a C � M c7 �O rD 2� ��«y. �1 �
fn O N
W p N c� a> �- N.� � N N j°C _� Z` — O Oi 2]�. 2=
�� fQ C C N N� O C�oL N^ � U �� m� W� d
J.�c o m� y` a�i c�i � o a �'� n m y � '�pQ _� a� d>�O
W F� m N 01 � N n y� W m H W J J W d W N'.' ¢ Z��p Z'O L.1 '00 R W Q�� c"�
V' Q C L� F fV M`p Z'(� a W p , ' 1 �� �
-� `o �mu�i��� � �o`oo o� O"xo 3ocom�* >�ra�a
Q Z � � � � � � � Q F- J J J N W a O J �� V ��� C N
� W — t�
.
. ,. �� �. , . -..__......_,__.._...�.,�,^, .—. --
:
' � . � �' . � .I.I
�
-
�
z
O
Qz
O � _
� � � U
i W w z
C� � � %�
Z } �S �
m � �
� rJ u: Z
Twi u.
> y � �
�� ` L
- U)
Z F- � `,
.-� � � �
LiJ w � �
� S � �I
" � T V
W � C W
� � Z o
•
1
c+�
� �
Z o
m o
�
��
� �
� �
OO z
�O
Q �,
� Z
v
F- �
O mLL
� �
W
Z �
J �
_ �
H �
� Q
z
Z Q
L.. Cn
= Q
H �
M �00 ,80 000 S
00 09l
�,
�n
�:�
� � H �
Z w
� � Q W �
Q � � � Z
v� = W cn O
z Z
Z O J �
w �z3
� _ � � z 0
"' w_'Oc=n
u; ' � �
Q I Z Z C; ���-
'-' � � � z Q ..
� I .. 1 G
_ ~ � Z --
- _.�. . ... �' G, C � _c:.
� � ..�� Q '- _
_ �� = C' L, l-:
- , �; F- Z � �-,
�-� W Q � ,.`
W G `-�
l-l1 � I � � Z J
�� � :" �, _�. �.t.. _ � F- F- �
�• L � n� Q W _'
C Q z v t�i w�-
CC ' !.'.J Cj � � Q
_. J; C�." Z `- J .�
%
� Y
V �
V �
N � 2 0
I� y y �
a N
� \ O�
i
� � M
O \Z �
�'
� \ %
� % �
� � ui
O M �
� �r � Z
Q
� \ �
� 11� _
�
� \ N
J '
� � �� o
�i �
� i,� � 3 Q
m
o \ � �
Z
O
�i \ � J
� V
� � �� �.. m � m
i O CO
� \ ( (l � I � Z L
� � J `d'� I Z
I \ c1s L_
I � \ � 3
� � m
� (4 SO \ r� Z ro
f2 e S\ \ 6 � a
3 est � � �
N � ��� � � � / �
N
� � o
V � � � �� o �
O Q� � / 'v
I� - =
�_ � ,,_ Q
N � `� � �
-� � � o
;
o � -,
0
o � � `- N J o
ui u� F' o.
N \ p� � tD
F
r y
E
Zc
0
J N
m
% �
w
a
SS
�.Ip�p� .
d o
,�2 i J �
� � S
a1`o'�S ON
—_ .__� � I m O Or >' m 01 O� y O N
1\ � Z N �� V C > L
00 �, -. _ ,T \ 1 I N '= m� O C m � lT0
I � J ' �j � V1
P r/� V / I � t O� N ��:� �' 1 C
-� Y o p� L 0 ; �p
� 1 � ') 3 �. y � •- �� O � O � t
_ f
r ;
\ (/
''--
0
0
�\
\
`� ,
� � �E O C C "' I
yr2 0 , � m �� ar`-a�m � �
t�� � o; '�� 3 � eu � t, m Z. � � �
�� o,"'r, o M.00 ,80 000 S � � 1O L Z m o '
M o� N� N 000b 3 m$d�os o L�
`S� '� v z g'" m..� o L'_ N °
, b 3 ^ _-` m w c
SO a� �i� '�.._ � Ul "� co �3 � � v 7
�9 � S ...._.,__...____ -.Y � «- � .r (� � m
bf� _g m m o��ao� � t=
'� y N Z C 0` � l0
, � � ° � � � � � 4� �a� i
f0 � �. � .� p n' y .L.. �p L (p
� '� �� �zmac; y t
'( � m m - �n -
o Y m co c� �� `3Z1� c � m
0
v V z � W �� o c�� $ � 3
O a� v`� o u' cn a� � 3�' c v
-^ : o � c
, 3 � �,, � �o��o m m�
I\� � o N .. .'� �� t j N y� �, fn L � C
I \ � � o � � � c Q � d�� � m �
\ o � ao o wct
� �� 3 Q a� C�� L Q' L N C L L
I N Z �� � C ��f 1� L C (n � . .
\ � � � v O p`p W N
cv p iq O N W u%�- d F- y�j a Y
�� �U ��cr � Fa- m
mm.= �� >.=cmy� w� �3
I� (� Z L 61 C N LL L L L w�. Q m
I U
I Z �� � J Z m�� CL � m J
L C ` �fN � U 'O E �
I I 3 -� N C m y�_� Z� � t0
°' � `-°��o o ao, �
b � O O�� N� C N
I I � dl � � " N g {q C l0 Y I
a a � iA yN � `y � [0 �p �
� a � o w o� � a m� rn
�ss L B � Z � � � � � � �
�C� oZ - ~ f� a` U C N C a� f0 D '
��6� bZ _ � .. :' SZ Z y o m c c o io � o ,.
I � N O.L.. T 3 Y_
�'� �o, r� �n J
i7 \\ � 96 �[ , P pj � c�i 4 �. O� c L '� '
�J B O R LL d,,Q,,, 8 C �
..QS �S 68Z x a \ . '9Z Z ^, Q 3 n N; G`� T C c0
o� � �'�.� --.. �°Q � d Q N h�J T= = C m I
8g'Sb� , C �/'�pM46� � gy p� ;[> W o o�, = o m � o a
` � ) N�°sla \ ) aqm �c Om�� c �rn
� 11ar� � W,� � y c y a '^ �
� � A r� `�� i 1 � � ���d ppo0 � ° � � a��i c � � d � � ��
��� � �
� �, M�b '�l�a�s m m � m� 2°� � � m i �
�� Cr �`1�, �� W� ��=Ld� mm c �o
� \ I � ar 3 C O" a� D D�� ; i�,
\\ J� O N C"�r W� N II U,,
� E m- 3�� � t a, . I
\ t m L V` C
3 .3 '' � i
o ; � ; i
Y m = o c i
�
N
�
N
I
rn
i j.
m
I � j
I �
o ! c �,
m
a � 07 0
'� �
i i= �
I
i � Y
ai n�0
�t...
�
�
�
c
m
�
m
L
a
N
�
�
n
Of
�
�
C
c
i
O
N
�
N
N
m
�
U
O
'C
�
�
N
J
d
M
N
�
�
N
H
v
N
U
w
�
L
c
�
a
c
�
d
>
m
L
�
W
H
<
F-
�
W
Y
w
w
¢
U
w
z
a
N
�
l9
Q
t
�
0
v
�
a
�
c
m
m
r
O
� '
� m.
m. �
m
L
O I
y �,
� i
x
� .
� '
ia
t o
� T
C W
m �
U
a
m
D
C
�
N
�
C
Y
�
m
m
a
�
m
N
t
E
m
O
�
�
��
i U
� �
O '�
m
a 3
C
U E
�
�
o °'
N C
� �, s
C C f�p
� gr
o a
O y
m m
N
� H �
�
O
N
m
C
�
,C
U
;
1 �
�
I m
I � �
i m
I C
i�'.4
,a E
` 8i W
z°�
0
�
C
I
b
�
m
E
�
N
c o
a C
d �
C
C � �
N
= m 3
o ; �
C
c�y �
� �
o � �
@p c �
N =
� � .
C C N
c p �
� � m
m3
O O �
� -
� L �
fn f- J
0
T
V
I
N mp�
L {�p
a
c �
0 0
a
� i
� i
� O
c
�
O
U
� Y
L
O C�
m c
� '-
O m
O
L O
U
C �
� T
� _
�
3 3
��
� C
E eO
�
I y �
C
N '
� '
Y
N O
L U
� O
� � �'
� T A
d
(�' m '
� L �
� U y� O
O � p yi
N
iiN p
C U �D �
C � � �
I � N � 3
Y � � O
_ � E �
� O N � tp
U � 0 y
`m E t
� � �
ui r �
' i N N .. �
°' Qo�4
�
i a w ro �
i U Q Y o�
� N w Uf
L
a E U � o
d �
� w
� 8 Zg ip
�Z� a='Q
y � �
m
m
�y�.
a� �
N �
Y . �Q
f0 "
o a m
�y N
� N
U CO C
N �
m E
� 3 W C
tggo
� >. $ N
O V � w
n m � �
=8��
�, o �-
� � m m
� �
� N O
NU
U C � �
YO a.
� N C y�
V � ; �
i. '° g o
N N
� N �
L
N ` 'O l0
j;, C C
d 01 0 .Q�
N
L 3 O� D
-�o�
� 5 ii
m �
L C O
�'�� �.
�- Q � l0
c� m 3. t
.o y -'� �
N � � �
m
L � � a
I �h
Z M
=o
y �
�� 4
' � �
' Y ¢
I J �
N
I � Q�
c
c
� i
m
�
m
�
Y
J
�
W
C
O
Q
$
ml
m
n
H
�
m
�
0`7
O
�
a1
�
d
O
c
Y
U
t0
m
� v
a�
c � �
C = ^
� � (7
_ `y 7
� � o
N
C O Z
'o v o
U Z �
�
O (n `-'
� ��
c o
� �' o
� p �n
� � C
W C
� H �
N
(n °C
wW
� w
a�
U Z
O W
�o
Q Z
oa
zN
a�
f.� O
w/� }
V W
� >
� �
�
Y �
Z Z
� J
W
m '.
� I�
� ,
U
.� yi
�a
c� x
m
S �
� .Q
ay
a' E
�, E
m $
�i
(n � OD N m N� V �� � X �
o m N� C a a o a Z °� Z
�o��N� Aoo m g�z
wo � Dp om �Q070 a� L�
� � �.� m=a� fA
� _ _� � � m. � n
�� O fn ?am �31
� � � � �
N in � a'
� Z � N N
Z � N ao �
m m
O � � d
V � �
� �c �
m m
N N
O. 2
A p 0 �D 7 �
N a O� W P1
"` � �ii L. �. �
�
V � � T�
A � �
61
�5�.
a
� �
Z�
cn
�
A
N
N
N ' ' ' ' � � '� -` �' �O m J W N A 4� N � y
O O 0�l N tT p 41 N� O 9
m
�
'ooion'='oKomm'�m4'4Nm'ousa=
O 9. � 4. O�. O. 9. J +p V j' N O C V D p 10
�:�8��:�e'�ie°;3aem�:
S `; ": a
<
s o
3 �
� 1 L fJ W 41 41 41 4l (J tJ (J yl N N N N N N N N N
N� O O��I O� V� L(J N � O ro 0 J T tli A 41 N+
AN01U� O A T PNO+F10� 1.(iNNOmS m
. ' :
m N P P� p 8 P%'� > 4 O 0 4 �O O. O M� N �
i ��>3�9�r •z�c.:� •e3zos
e g . a m � n• m n q
3 � � s� <;
> > � N
� O �
] �
o Q
m
r
n
a
�
O
Z
D
�
rrr�D � , � � � , � z �pgo u'm � o r
0 0 0 0 70 O � m o m m m .
w�v �ND vmrrm�aom N� � `° am��➢
m x N y x�o � rn �� w+' ��� o� r
� nm �ivo�n °o`���m�vo�
`� � (?� C N � � ~ � ~ � � _' � (n
N ���G (D Q,� (n O. 7 p_ O
m ww� � ROaoG'o� v, OacO —m °�� ��'7Ao
tD O O WO O N(J O 7 C (n = 7 n � c� � 61 t� �
o v ao - `o `^ � r � < � � `° m � m m a —I
n�iv�ipc°'a nQN<°O� �m�Z°'o,moa,0
�. �. N to (/1 � m � � � � � � O � � � � � Z
^� o �v, '� m�m�o,� ��Q"
� � � a C) � � Q. O � A — � p,
C � (D O_ � -^ C p �. � � � � (D N
-+ O O W N� F G(D p— j N�� ^ O�
� o � o � � � m ' 3 �p � �o o `^ m o ° °' `�
O�G �? �� N p_ 0 7 p) ?= p�
�c�i �c�i o ,c�i m Q �a � � � d c � `o � con m ° � �
N S () ti, �
O� � a � p � � � � F m � � (D O
� N a m � `wG N Z
(D � � � �" � 4e � � ' � � O O N
� � � d O 01 � a (D � N � _ � c�
� acD `� n�o �o» m ?_ `�,'-
� � fn ,� �� d C� N � 7
p (D (D N Q y (D � � N � � � �
w a � F C� � �° m`° � o j
f �� cD ,�' rn �� F v r, o-
m m � o ' �m
� y o�° A = N? w� �
� a � `� � � � � � � d
O N 0 nFi j a�G ��� � � ...
� � a� o 0 0���^ D �
tD O 3] p N 7 3' � 0 a �
� �
x- m a 3 2 c�i `� � c° o� ?
N � m o v, m a
�
Q � � � na� � ay c�o
�, � a� _ _ „� � v' -
�
m
s
MN �s
-• eg??ieB1.7 �
�. ���
�� ._._..__ ,� BBY�� FX�
- \ 9•�S S�\
`\ � _ _
r - � Sewer s "eee. i-�...
.; . � r .. � . .
� _ . .F... � �� � ,.. .. �'�. . _ .... .
�,. � � � . ` ''� �.
11 > >qs 6g } ��DD Rpq� ._
I� � R� 8s�2 0' � �EFFERSON HI��w
� �9 �24 _ + E.Y. 16" pIP M Ay�
. I - �`"�� �� - w
. . .. � I �• � ..._'
I �
10 y�
i i ! r� �
V ;
. O � � _�� l_.'... ' ,
1' I • L � � ��; C• �
� �, . � � t" 7 �- >. ..
al. . . =O ; �� . . .
\ � I .t} N �... • B � . � � .
t m � � �
2 W
O
y tD
� V
N J
N
0
0
i
q m a� � r o c � .. �
�c- � � m o - o' �o '`� I
m �° �? a � � i � i
O A A m—< �..,� Ix3 � m
� � N � O � N- �
� Ci � j"" cD O N
O[D O� V Z O
� O � C
cD O � � V W �G
a a�� f� 9 i o x x s
v v a�� r a 9 i N N m a
Gl C f O� n � y-1 N Z
D D
0 o m x x= m c� m i m m m
c � = p z 9 z N� m y o-
ti I� � y y y O C �
9
r m 9 D 9� 9 -� I
� � c �
� � ti ~I
<
i S O I
_ � , , � =,t5 �i 1
�
n 'u I
m N 0
O ^1 il � . N
y Ll 1 I 9 9 m r m �
9 9 A 9 r p x I
9 C p r 9 9[I � N
p Z 9� Q �.� C ti
(l� C D m N N -1
O r m y O �� m T
f]3 ~m N� y m
�-i rrm a'^ � r
~ y O O y D a y m
O y y y A m
� m n
A O
z m
y r
<
�� I
�' I I � .
� O
I N
I I
� �
40.00 � �
\ S 00° 08' 00" W �
s i
40 1 $ i
� \_ I � z„
4 ��,_� _
�,
�,
� � � �i I
,
r
t�_3-��- ' I �o
i I
� i I
I � rv
�
., �
�,�
��"�ro�
\T�
•r
� uy
���•"..�_. .E
�r �
1f
1 a< ' �
� �my � V
�'
� � i
a �
o y
0
� � m
<�
m
� / I 30
1
r I
•
~ � •
<�
��<
J�
Y
N
N
N
� � )a �
•\
O� �p
y,�i�' � m
N
��a w 1
;
� �
/ Q \
/ m
�, � m
' N N
j � A
, 3
`: �
I
�
. `�,
�
100' SETBACK
'_ 180
180.00
I. S 00° 08' 00" W
L 100' SETBACK
:
� �
rx ... . . . . __v_._.
�
Z
�
f0
0
N
N
0
O
�
.�
� ,�
Ron Krueger � �
Associates, inc.
Enginaerfng Land Surveying Planning
8080 Wallace Road —
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
(612) 934-4242 �
�
_ '
N Q
C'f
S
r
m
�
0
Z
�
m
m
�
0
0
cn
0
N
O
O
z
' o
� �
� a 3s
� � n r�
� O NN
.-. � � � r
M z z z =o
m m w��
Q NN o0
� �� ¢
F-1-
VZ�
� N � 2
� � NN �.<w
� o°' o� ���
s<
�ouo
� Z �' w W m�-
�
/.��. w �, � �
l,� �F— ONmOO ¢n
P
�Q Y� ��Q ��z
.-�.wwF €r
Q� � �rio��� � `s
(L ^���at,Nj `.0
wr o�imm��Z �zi
�Q t—F� �_�
� 000��n �
Q zzzwa� "'
F— Li. i- �- � i i�' `o:o
0o www�5� ¢_�
N 00000� ��
ly��-"' daa�n„�Q �o
ZC=7 rr���o o��
'--� i--i Q ¢ ¢ Y r
�� NNNMHO r�o
a
2 - � S i t . ' '
N �
a� -
�w ¢` ¢g"_«-�-pg�^^�-�-=--,�«
o Q nrc"� -_- w8:8�.",Si r8
�� - � -- � �
o � - e - '"" - -
m�
� �� a� Q� _.
a� n a� e � �_
�� "v4'w°"vv�oa�voW«=�^�4�:4W:o��
-mm�mmummmmmmmummmmemmmmmmn
�s
g€
� y
� F.
�%y'g�
oEbt�
"'ag<
o' _
��e�:
�yEbF
���$a
��=eo
�b�:�
€
"r
mq
� �� �
�E �b �
tT 5 � a� -
o � E b t
§ b j � i
�b ` y g
fi � g
!o $ Qo3
s� b�fg
� _ � t6'g �
b�� b� � c
� � t�Y�`�W ro�
���
< `'4b 4 �� p8 a� aca
g ~ �' � 8 �6 YNa
4� _ �� L� ou<
���g& ��
? s ���
� � _m.
�
f
g 3 � �gb o� �
fi� �
¢ ��-��,gS�ss
€�
�b�
b��
b�fi
g£8
� ���
� � �%8 ��
_s
�� ti �
ar �s
� �a� � b
��s p£ E
s'a �'s
ge :�� g�
y€ fag (J Y:
� ��� . �
YS ��.
o�� £ 5
= y^16 Y
j �.i �
n
O
r
0
�
V
I�]
O
Z
�—�
�
=o 0
n� �
g= �
�= �a "�-
�a^
Ig �3 �:�
� g� mss R
iooa �. J
�T-----
I� :
..0 ss N 3 YNIlSI%3 ,xia
N
�
soce �
o s
I � �
a
tiQ
V
C.��
Q
voos000
� a.
J
= r^
n N g a—
� F- o
: � W -� �
� o
a x m a
�^�
_ S ,cz
�,v�rmiustro�r vu
I �•o�t
'N'1 �NS1S1%3 M/a ___��---
Ss � !OZ �3�HYd
� � mF w
� n <;— m
�� g° � e�`�6- m
ma ti � ,a
odd� �
a 4 m
w� >
¢� � m
aQ ,~^ d �
_/ `
� � 6
ti
ti
OO �
�
3HI11511 I aroe
[C'H'Y'SJ Y ��
____�___� X1� ]
N
n
�
F
N
w
rc
a
g �
1
_ ... .__ I I S
� �l� °�
� � ��h : �
� ` �
�� g �°
Z�V pE � s .
` E-fe`
<�� �1"' \\ �@ g6985�e�b� j
ori 1 N " .
�
ou< I � 3� <������ E .
� I 3
i �+
O `I � �J �
�,
�4 S '��
o � � N � III s
a _ I �C
d�
� EE
~ o i t�tEF��4�U �
m I 6S€JtSF��y� i
^ � � �`$•s E� _
i ��., 5W&at,.
.
� 218
w — �j '
b�
d
Wb SL 'N'1 �NI15IX3
I �Mia ,.os ,
� I �
�
~ (1t12'llldlA'1
�
e ¢
N u
N
Y
O
m
�
h � r
�r 53N11 A1tl3dJUd 1� J
3
BL�L'tlYdl'3'1 Y��Z'Wdl'3'! �
m =\���Tf�� �: �, �l i i
I
�I
a
w
�
n {N I70
dF ' w
I w� a�a
ivl ^u� Z
r �
N • N
z$ . �
� �� xio
1
/ .
".�i`.__. - '�"-�r-�� �r � [119 '�" le ',
a�.z ��ei�z iaoar�i- rtdi i3�era �Mia �
— OtlOtl BONM —101id— � � �'
-bCi�.� -,Stl- .M/b i.o1� o YIYG a21R'a
AY \�i nrS�L _ � n
n � OII-GI � Y46f
IJ1K'YVdI'3'1 Op-[1 1 YFiS S1Y�d 335 S1Yl� SHIOfOV
' 1.2i313W3� N21Vd aux •uraVT1H.'1V uoe �: •aas oi ��w
�o�
�=V
o��u
��u
YVIN
«�
ou<